Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-09-25 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA September 18, 1996 NOTICE OF MEETING pine: JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS (7141962-2411 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 mailing address: PO Be. drew: OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA . Fountain Valley,GA 92728-e127 WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 25, 1996 - 7:30 P.M. stleet address: 10944 Ellis Avenue Fot 9270&7ole DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Member The Regular Meeting of the Joint Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Agana. Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, will 0 be held at the above location, time and date. calla. Anaheim Brea Buena Park cypress Fountain Valley Fullerton Bo 5ecr dry Huntington Beach Irvine Le Habra Le Palma Loa Alamitos Newport Batch Tentatively - Scheduled Upcoming Meetings Orange Placards Saute Are $ eas Beach erna, STRATEGIC PLANNING WORKSHOP - Saturday, September 21, 1996, at 9:00 a.m. Tustin Villa Park STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday,September 25, 1996, at 5:30 p.m. Yorbe Linda cauncy ar orange OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND - Wednesday, October 2, 1996 at 5:30 p.m. TECHNICAL SERVICES Sanitary Districts PLANNING,DESIGN AND - Thursday, October 3, 1996, at 5:30 p.m. coats Mesa CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE Garden Grove Mrdway GiCy FINANCE,ADMINISTRATION AND - Wednesday,October 9, 1996,at 5:30 p.m. Water Dietricta HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE Irvine Reach STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday, October 23, 1996,at 5:30 p.m. A Public Marewater and Enorormental Management Agency committed ne Protecting the Environment Since 1954 &N—` s JOINT BOARD MEETING DATES Month Joint Board Meeting October Oct 23, 1996 November Nov 20, 1996 December Dec 18, 1996 January Jan 22, 1997 February Feb 26, 1997 March Mar 26, 1997 April Apr 23, 1997 May May 28, 1997 June June 25, 1997 July July 23, 1997 August August 27, 1997 September September 24, 1997 October October 22, 1997 ^ r 1, OUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA t September 19, 1996 g [714)9682411 To the Chair and Members 411 of the Joint Boards of Directors mailing eddreau RO.Box 8127 Subject: Board Letter Fountain Valle,..CA B272"127 .treats : 10844 Ellis Aden Avenue The following are items that you may find interesting. If you need additional Fai m.m v.iiey,CA information on any of the items, please call me. 92708-7018 Correction to Article in The Register In the middle of August, The Register published an article about the performance of Member public agency treasuries in Orange County. In the case of the Districts, there were Agencies two errors in the table which listed the size and performance of the various • portfolios. Cities Anaheim The anticipated future yield of the Districts' portfolios as they existed on June 30, Brae 1996 was reported as 5.55% but should have been 6.36%, while the actual yield for Buena Park 1995-96 of$21.4 million, which was reported as 5.20% should have been 5.97%. 0ypress Fountain Valley Fullerton While the primary goal of the Districts' investment policy is safety, followed by Huntington BeaneIry liquidity and then yield, it should be noted that the yield performance of our Le Habrera portfolios, principally managed by PIMCO, ranks in the top 5 of the 44 agencies Le Palm. listed in the article. Los Alamitos Newport Beech orange Orange County Register Article - Pringle's Merger Bill Dies in End Placentia Banta Ana Saal Beach Attached is an article from The Register regarding Pringle's merger bill which meant Stantan to create an Orange County Special District of 25 water and sewer districts. With villa Park the close of the Legislature's work for the year, the bill died in the Senate. yorbe Linea County of Orange Orange County Register Article -Water Bill Has Funds For Orange County Barite,y Oletrict. Attached is an article about a bill which has passed The House of Representatives and which contains a provision for the first phase of a $151 million Orange County Cost. Mesa project to treat sewage and recycle it for drinking water. This bill would authorize Gordon y ove City spending committees to appropriate mone for the project to reclaim 100 million Mleway City P 9Y P 1 gallons of sewage a day from the Districts. The money has yet to be appropriated! Water Districts Won Bench Letter To Barbara Boxer and Dianne Feinstein Re: Reclamation Recycling and Water Conservation Act of 1996 (Bills H.R. 3660 and S 901) Attached are copies of the letters sent to Ms. Boxer and Ms. Feinstein requesting their support for the Orange County Reclamation Project at the Senate level. Bill H.R. 3660 (Reclamation Recycling and Water Conservation Act of 1996), passed A Public Wasteweter and Environmental Men.gement Agency Committed to Proaecting the Environment Since 1954 Chair and Members of the Joint Boards of Directors Page 2 September 19, 1996 by the House of Representatives, authorizes the Bureau of Reclamation to provide federal construction assistance for water reclamation treatment and distribution facilities. Section 1624 of this bill would authorize Phase 1 of the Orange County Reclamation Project. Bill S 901 (bill to amend the Reclamation Projects Authorization and Adjustment Act of 1992), which is similar to Bill H.R. 3660 but at the Senate level, does not include support for the Orange County Reclamation Project; therefore, the Districts' is asking that Ms. Boxer and Ms. Feinstein support adoption by the Senate of H.R. 3660, or in the alternative, amend S 901 to include support for the Orange County Reclamation Project. Update On EMA EMA, the consultant that prepared the "Competitiveness Assessment Report"for the Districts, has been retained to provide professional services related to: (1)selecting and training an O&M team called the "Districts'Assessment and Reinvention Team" (DART); (2) develop a team charter and purpose; (3) prepare a report that identifies the O&M business practices that should be changed and determine the productivity improvements gained with the business practice changes; and (4) develop a schedule and costs related to reinventing the Operations and Maintenance Department. Phase III of the work estimated to begin after the first of the year and which may take three years, would implement the recommendations from the work already underway. The EMA Competitiveness Assessment Report has identified a 15 to 20 percent O&M budget savings potential by property automating the treatment plant, cross training staff, combining O&M (done), improving the preventive maintenance program, and operating more unattended facilities. Letter to Curt Pringle Re: Bolsa Chica State Beach Attached is a letter sent by Joint Chair Collins to Mr. Pringle detailing the chronology of events regarding the elevated bacterial concentrations along Bolsa Chica State Park. The problem was detected during the Spring and Summer of 1995 and it was determined that the cause was a leaking State Parks Sewer. An interim solution is in place but has not solved all the problems. State Parks has indicated that they are pursuing two authorization scenarios to solve this problem, but because of existing budgetary and procurement constraints, State Parks estimates authorization may not occur until late in the fiscal year and repairs Chair and Members of the Joint Boards of Directors Page 3 September 19, 1996 still would not be complete until 1997 or early 1998. We will continue to work with the State to expedite this project. CASA Letter to Member Agencies Re: SCA 39 -(Constitution Revision Committee) Attached is a copy of the letter from CASA regarding the Conference Committee's recommendation on SCA 39 that the requirement for each county to establish a local Community Charter Commission will not be a part of the package this year. CASA and other special district associations had opposed the California Constitution Revision Commission's recommendation that Community Charter be constitutionally mandated. There are no direct implications for any of CASA's member agencies regarding this measure and to date, it is still unclear whether there is necessary support for the scaled-back constitutional amendment to be placed on the supplemental ballot in November. Proposition 218 At the September FAHR Committee, Proposition 218 was discussed. The Committee was informed that if it passed, the initiative process could be used to negate or roll back user fees and that the procedural requirements to mail detailed information to every parcel and hold a public hearing to extend or increase user fees would probably cost the Districts approximately a quarter of a million dollars annually. The Committee decided to take no position on the measure but directed staff to prepare informational material on the impacts of Proposition 218 on this agency. The Committee also requested information on the ballot arguments. On September 13, Judy Wilson attended a briefing in Sacramento. Attached is a copy of the ballot arguments as well as "Guidelines for Public Agencies Regarding Ballot Measures." These guidelines were developed by a group of attorneys working for large water agencies in the State in close collaboration with the Fair Political Practices Commission's General Counsel. Arguing in favor of Proposition 218 are Joel Fox, President, Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, Jim Conran, President Consumers First, and Richard Gann, President of Paul Gann's Citizens Committee. Signing the argument opposing Proposition 218 are Howard Owens, Congress of California Seniors, Lois Tinson, President, California Teachers Association and Ron Snider, President, California Association of Highway Patrolman. a Chair and Members of the Joint Boards of Directors Page 4 September 19, 1996 Sangermano Trial The Sangermano trial has been postponed to February due to conflict in Attorney and Court schedules. Orange County's Bankruotcv Case Status Attached is a letter from Pillsbury Madison and Sutro to Pool Participants which provides status of the various post-confirmation issues in the County's bankruptcy case. The status report provides information on the County's focus regarding routine type of objections and the County's fling of six other actions against third parties in addition to its adversary proceedings against Merrill Lynch. Orange County's Ootion B Pool Participants Attached is a fax from Pillsbury Madison and Sutro regarding Option B Pool Participants (SB 2169). This legislation would have enhanced the litigation posture of Option B claims against the County and third parties; however, it was not signed by the Governor. Soecial Edition of The News Pipeline -An Interview With Bob Ooten Attached is a special edition of The News Pipeline detailing an interview with Bob Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance. This is the seventh edition issue providing interview questions to Executive Management staff members. The next edition will feature an interview with Gary Streed, Director of Finance. Changing Times Newsletter Attached is a newsletter regarding the visit to two Colorado Treatment Plants by six Districts' employees and their recommendations for our own reengineering efforts. The employees returned with enthusiasm and insight in addition to many new ideas on how to better implement change that benefits everyone. Districts to Host City Managers COG The Districts is making our meeting facilities available to city and county officials as part of our external-audience outreach efforts. The first two groups we will be hosting are the City Managers for their November meeting and the Council of Governments for their October and November regular meetings. In the future we Chair and Members of the Joint Boards of Directors Page 5 September 19, 1996 hope to become a meeting site for other organizations. Brochure From The Technical Assistance Center As we have reported to the Joint Boards, the Source Control Division of the Technical Services Department has been working with industries in Orange County to provide technical assistance to improve the quality of their discharges to the sewerage system. Attached is the first tangible product from the Technical Assistance Center, a brochure on management of grease and oil discharges. Grease and oil is a particular problem in our collection system, especially downstream of restaurants. This brochure will be distributed to restaurants and other food service operations with the help of the Restaurant Association and other trade organizations. The brochure was designed by the Communications Division. U.S. EPA Award Attached is a memorandum from Mike Konyu of EPA who will be presenting an award to Source Control staff for their help in the investigative efforts of EPA, California EPA, and the Orange County District Attorney regarding the Venus Labs Case in 1994. Review of Governance in Orange County -The Government Practices Oversiaht Committee IGPOCI Reoort As you may know this report has been released in final form. The mission of the 25-member all volunteer citizen group was: "to create a comprehensive, objective, and understandable source book of information on the County and other local governments which residents and constituencies can use to evaluate and generate proposals for change in local government. The Government Practices Oversight Committee will synthesize the source book and the committee's outreach efforts to produce findings and recommendations leading to a more efficient and effective delivery of public services to the people of Orange County." This report was developed into 3 phases: - Fact Book - Identify best governing principles - Findings and recommendations While the report focuses primarily on the County and to some extent cities, there is a brief section on special districts. The findings and recommendation for special districts is on pages 100 and 101. (Copies attached). Chair and Members of the Joint Boards of Directors Page 6 September 19, 1996 Subsequent to the issuance of this report, the County CEO's office has developed a separate but related document entitled "External Restructuring Policy Report." A quick review suggests that this substantially overlaps the GPOC report. It identifies the need to clarify county-city responsibilities and to ensure that service delivery is appropriately assigned. There is a reference to the county relationship to the COG as well as special districts, surface transportation issues, and regional planning. At the County Board of Supervisors meeting on September 17, they unanimously approved the report with some changes in wording that would give their approval of these concepts as opposed to approving a firm policy position. The work plan, although ambitious, calls for a special meeting with Board of Supervisors representatives to discuss special district consolidation sometime in January. Page four of the report is attached for your information. If you would like additional information on any of the above items, please call me. Donald F. McIntyre General Manager DFM:cmc JIxvooncMmFw» DLimss 2w Attachments: Article from The Register- Pringle's Merger Bill Dies in End Article from The Register-Water Bill Has Funds for Orange County September 10, 1996 Letters to Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer on Reclamation September 6, 1996 Letter to Curt Pringle on Boise Chica State Beach August 29, 1996 Letter from CASA on Conference Committee Recommendation Proposition 218 Guidelines for Public Agencies- Re: Ballot Measures September 11, 1996 Fax from Pillsbury Madison & Sutro on the Bankruptcy September 18, 1996 Fax from Pillsbury Madison & Sutro on the Bankruptcy Special Edition of The News Pipeline -An Interview With Bob Dolan Changing Times Newsletter- Six Districts' Employees Visit Two Colorado Plants Brochure From The Technical Assistance Center March 26, 1996 Letter from EPA regarding Source Control Award Pages 4, 100 & 101 of the GPOC Report a M o c v o c 'a oZ Mat is the Problem %� ow �m G� DD with Oil and Grease o Z > 0. M � in the Sewer? Fm �� Cp 0 > N L y 0'4 m y� � D Clogs HelI as I r Sewer gTease and Y oil Sewer Backs up into Streets, d ischaT es Parking Lots, Homes and I Your Kitchen the seweT riHow You Creates Creates O Health Odors Hazards County Sanitation Districts of Orange County „ - How You Can Help . . . Be Rware of the Reduce Oil Be Kind to Sources of Grease and Grease to the the Grease Trap Sewer Grease traps keep grease out What is grease? of the sewers. But a grease trap ■ Scrape off can be a problem instead of Meat Fats trays, plates a solution unless you help the Lard and pans into grease trap do its job! Cooking Oil waste-grease Butter cans for recycling. • Pump and service Shortening grease traps often. ■ Scrape grills and cooking Where does it come from? surfaces into grease cans ■ Reduce solids going Fryers Spoiled Food for recycling. to the grease trap. Pots and Pans Floors Scraps Cooking Surfaces ■ Place meat scraps, fat or leftovers Reduce grease in trash bins discharges by reducing for disposal. and recycling grease. How does it get into Even if you use additives the sewer? ■ Put baskets in to help grease trap "digestion,” drains to catch don't forget to maintain Sinks solids. Use trash bins the grease traps! Floor Drains for disposal. Food Grinders NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS Name of Paper Section Page Oats - �}.C- QP�ISE ( le�io �1-Jme/r�or, b'// dips DISTRICTS Pringle s PRDM t — Midway City Sanitary and - Santiago County Water. ' But each concession tipped the merger bill balance elsewhere n he wm- 1plex web of water districts.When 2eim and Santa Ana moved o cement their rights to pump and water,- Irvine com- lamed. dies i n end W "They were trying to time[ What we can take,"Irvine Ranch ' � Water District director Peer an said. "When you get into 'r people's water rights leg- LEGISLATION: The PRINGLE: atively, that's scary." Senate washes Out the - Consolidation A_IrtneLs efforts made the bill whisked :, Santa Margarita Co. nervous-i consolidation of water - = mrongn Y about any advantage Irvine I agencies. + Assembly but might get in ground-water.. spa F..� fell in Democrat- rights. O'Neill said he let Lack,- By RICKY YOUNG controlled yer know of his concerns. The Orange County Register Senate. L "I'm not so crazy about' SACRAMENTO—Republican change," O'Neill said. "They" Curt Pringle's first bill asspeak- Ana and Anaheim. - asked me what I thought about it,- The bell started as an effort to and I said, 'Why change it. er scaled through the Assembly create one Orange County agen- Pringle said change is needed; on the strength of his leadership cout of 25 water districts with and that he will try again. —a good-government reform,he Y said, to merge a patchwork of 1,800 employees andacombened "I would recommend these wa- Orange County water districts. annual budget of S696 million. ter districts act as if this bell But the bill deed with the early- Pringle hoped to streamline were enacted into law," Pringle Sunday end of the Legislature's water service that now Bows- said. "Because it well be." work for the year, a casualty in through several layers of govern- - the Democrat-controlled state ment ; Senate. The situation was highlighted' "It met with political brinks- by the collapse of the Orange manship," Pringle said. "It was County investment pool in De- the only bill significant to me cember 1994, and Pringle ques-' that was in the Senate. Things tioned why many districts had get swallowed up like that." enough taxpayer and ratepayer Senate Democratic leader Bill money to absorb millions of dol- Lockyer of Hayward said he lars in losses with little effect. heard rumblings that the bill Mergers for efficiency had would raise water rates for poor- been recommended—to no avail er residents of Anahaim and San- —by grand juries and other re- ta Ana — and for former state formers for three decades. Prin- Democratic Party Chairman gle eventually stumbled on the Dick O'Neill's Santa Margarita same lobbying efforts that sty- Co mied past efforts. "Obviously, the speaker is an He scaled back the bill,calling integral part of the Republican for several smaller-scaleconsoli- poBtical establishment in dations among water districts— Orange County," Lockyer said. for instance, Laguna Beach's "I don't want to be involved in an and south Laguna's water des-' unfairness to Democratic, poor- tricts would have been merged at communities or to Democratic and the cities of Yorba Linda and. businesses." Los Alamitos would have taken' Pringle said his bill was not over separate water districts; intended to create any such on- serving their communities. fairness, and he said it would Some districts were exempted have helped residents of Santa Please see DISTRICTS Page 2 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS Name of Paper Sedlon papa Dale Sub � C �eo,is-�er llle�io e? 9•s-5!o �'{v bill has r.nds ;oi C.C, Water bill has funds for O.C. POLITICS: The filet phase of a water-recla- matioD project is ap- proved by the House. 6y JAMF3 V.Masashi The Ornnge County Mgkter WASHINGTON —The Homes. of Repre..mnves . Wedne. day Passed a water bi l that eon. tame a provision for the first phase of a d151 million Orange County Project to heat sewage and recyclelt fordrinking water. The provision has been pushed for more than a year by Rep.Jay ofthan House PPublicPbBar.o member of the H House c Works Com- minee. Wednesday. three Orange County congressmen dispatched news releases heralding passage of the legislation; Reps. Ron Packard, R-0c u mide; Robert K. Do.., R-Garden Grove; and Kim. Packard praised the but.and both Corona and Kim task cmd- it.Wm ewmmince hasjurisdic nos over the legislation. Credit was note concern of B W Mats, general ..agar of the Orange County Water District. "This is good news,"he said. The bill authorizes spending comminche to appropriate mom -ey for the project,which would reclaim ]Op mlWan gWove of sewage a day from a sanimnon. district plant in Fountain Valley, Mill.said. 'Me heated water woWd be pumped Wong the Santa Ana Pover to Anaheim, where It would be treated again and to- turned to the groundwater table. When completed, the project wand provide ae much ee ID Dery coot of the water used In Orange County, Min said. The treated water now is dumped into the ocean. a COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA September 10, 1996 pl�: r714)99224„ The Honorable Dianne Feinstein "R�"� United States Senate EAureWn`d".GA Washington, D.C. 20510 92]2Be,27 106"SE SUBJECT: Reclamation Recycling and Water Conservation Act of 1996 F "Wa y,M (Bills H.R. 3660 and S 901) 927M7019 Speaking for the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (Sanitation fft"* n Districts), I request your support for the Orange County Reclamation Project. Ag— The Sanitation Districts is a large publicly owned treatment works (POTW) facility that treats 250 million gallons per day of wastewater and serves 2.1 °tla' million Orange County residents. This project will provide up to 100 million ananean gallons per day of recycled water for the citizens of Orange County, and most a , P a important, this project will reduce Orange County's dependence on imported waters from the Sacramento Bay Delta and the Colorado River. kwo ^°non aBBC The Metropolitan Water District has indicated that Southern California will to Habm need to create or import another 1.1 million acre-feet of new water supplies Lw by the year 2000 to survive drought conditions. The Reclamation Project will Na,eg4,x&,6 provide up to 50,000 acre-feet of reclaimed water by the year 2001 with an additional 25,000 acre-feet by the years 2010 and 2020. This reclaimed SSA Ana water will help to reduce or remove the need for Orange County to increase 51 imports of water from Central and Northern California. 71s vme Perk „rAa u. The Sanitation Districts' partner in the Reclamation Project is the Orange C ur" d Orange County Water District. Our agencies have a long history of working together to reclaim water for the benefit of our local community. The success of our s.en.ry o.e,w agencies has been recognized and relied upon by regulators and c� associations throughout the State of California. The technologies developed men C * for this project will meet all federal and state safety guidelines, remain M.UW°tj economically feasible, and revolutionize water reclamation for years to come. Please see the attached facility map of the Reclamation Project. Mane RancA On September 4, the House of Representatives passed the Reclamation Recycling and Water Conservation Act of 1996(H.R. 3660), a bill that would authorize the Bureau of Reclamation to provide federal construction A PUNC Wastewater eM Enn Mnul Menage ent Agency Canmlaee t4 Fremwng"Enwe Mnt S rro 1954 The Honorable Dianne Feinstein Page 2 September 10, 1996 assistance for water reclamation treatment and distribution facilities. Section 1624 would authorize Phase 1 of the Orange County Reclamation Project. The Senate is considering a similar bill, S 901, a bill to amend the Reclamation Projects Authorization and Adjustment Act of 1992. Unfortunately, the Senate version does not include support for the Orange County Reclamation Project. As you enter the final weeks of the legislative session, I request that you support adoption by the Senate of H.R. 3660, or in the alternative, amending S 901 to include support for the Orange County Reclamation Project. I cannot stress enough the necessity for this project to help protect California's environment and economy. The CalFed Process has been ongoing for many years to find a solution to the environmental and economic problems caused by demand for water from the Sacramento Bay Delta. This Reclamation Project would help to alleviate some of the demand for water from this unique and precious California resource. This project is a shining example of a community working together to meet its local needs while considering the long-term and far-reaching consequences of its action. If you have any questions or would like further information, please contact me at (714) 962-2411. Thank you for your careful consideration of this project. Donald F. Mclntyr General Manager DFM/JEC:wh JMP115.50WLSTONV EADY503B .LTR c: B. Mills, GM - OCWD E. Sapirstein, CSDOC Consultant J. McConnell, OCWD Consultant The Honorable Dianne Feinstein Page 3 September 10, 1996 bc, B. Anderson N.W heatley M. Moore COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA September 10, 1996 m� prat sszzat11 The Honorable Barbara Boxer "�Bae B z; United States Senate �Vsk+•r^ Washington, D.C. 20510 W72BB127 1waaM�aa SUBJECT: Reclamation Recycling and Water Conservation Act of 1996 Fawn Way.cA (Bills H.R. 3660 and S 901) 92MO-MlS Speaking for the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (Sanitation Membu Districts), I request your support for the Orange County Reclamation Project. AB8AO88 The Sanitation Districts is a large publicly owned treatment works (POTW) 0 facility that treats 250 million gallons per day of wastewater and serves 2.1 Co. million Orange County residents. This project will provide up to 100 million mahaea gallons per day of recycled water for the citizens of Orange County, and most Swah B''B important, this project will reduce Orange County's dependence on imported r va P- waters from the Sacramento Bay Delta and the Colorado River. Fuaermn Beach The Metropolitan Water District has indicated that Southern California will u need to create or import another 1.1 million acre-feet of new water supplies u Pe. b the 2000 to survive drought conditions. The Reclamation Project will LAs Ab xcs Y year 9 1 Na»va.:Beach provide up to 50,000 acre-feet of reclaimed water by the year 2001 with an Pry additional 25,000 acre-feet by the years 2010 and 2020. This reclaimed Same Ana water will help to reduce or remove the need for Orange County to increase Seal Beach imports of water from Central and Northern California. raedn m Per* m un]a The Sanitation Districts' partner in the Reclamation Project is the Orange cm." of Creeps County Water District. Our agencies have a long history of working together to reclaim water for the benefit of our local community. The success of our Bang Dist tw agencies has been recognized and relied upon by regulators and Coate maae associations throughout the State of California. The technologies developed G Nm Brore for this project will meet all federal and state safety guidelines, remain AW.W�y economically feasible, and revolutionize water reclamation for years to come. waw mavicta Please see the attached facility map of the Reclamation Project. e.;na amen On September 4, the House of Representatives passed the Reclamation Recycling and Water Conservation Act of 1996(H.R. 3660), a bill that would authorize the Bureau of Reclamation to provide federal construction A Public waere varer and Em rcn nral Managemenr Agency Camm=ad w Prcrecuw me E..mr&me 1854 3 The Honorable Barbara Boxer Page 2 September 10, 1996 assistance for water reclamation treatment and distribution facilities. Section 1624 would authorize Phase 1 of the Orange County Reclamation Project. The Senate is considering a similar bill, S 901, a bill to amend the Reclamation Projects Authorization and Adjustment Act of 1992. Unfortunately, the Senate version does not include support for the Orange County Reclamation Project. As you enter the final weeks of the legislative session, I request that you support adoption by the Senate of H.R. 3660, or in the alternative, amending S 901 to include support for the Orange County Reclamation Project. I cannot stress enough the necessity for this project to help protect California's environment and economy. The CalFed Process has been ongoing for many years to find a solution to the environmental and economic problems caused by demand for water from the Sacramento Bay Delta. This Reclamation Project would help to alleviate some of the demand for water from this unique and precious California resource. This project is a shining example of a community working together to meet its local needs while considering the long-term and far-reaching consequences of its action. If you have any questions or would like further information, please contact me at (714) 962-2244111. Thank you for your careful consideration of this project. Donald F. clntyre General Manager DFWJEC:wh J:\W P17880=LSTON%R EAD`W0388.LTR c: B. Mills, GM - OCWD E. Sapirstein, CSDOC Consultant J. McConnell, OCWD Consultant The Honorable Barbara Boxer Page 3 September 10, 1996 bc: B. Anderson N.Wheatley M. Moore ' P COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, -CALIFORNIA Post-It^brand fax transmittal memo 7671 idpages. September 6, 1996 Ph— Honorable Curt Pringle Speaker of the Assembly ao va 8127 Stale of California Yda 1 CAae7a9aia7 12865 Main Street,Suite 100 ad Garden Grove,CA 92640 -�0944 Else Momre �Eavnmin venom,CA Dear Curt: ,,..,ez7oa•�Bte Pursuant to my telephone conversation with Brad Wilkinson of your staff, I am providing herein details of a situation that I believe could benefit greatly from your involvement. The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County(Sanitation Districts)discharge treated c1u ngendee wastewater off the coast of Orange County under permit by the Environmental Protection th`� . , • Agency and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. The permit requires the Sanitation Districts to measure coliform bacteria concentrations at 17 surtzone locations along the coastline from Sunset Beach to Corona Del Mar. During the Spring and Summer of 1995,the Allah/, Sanitation Districts'surfzone monitoring detected elevated bacterial concentrations along Boise Chica Beach State Parks,caused by a leaking State Parks Sewer. Because of State euene Park budgetary and procurement constraints,8 appears that re airs can not occur sooner than the n.Park 9 ry P P (aumein valley winter of 1997-98. �Y,�}!$FWlermn mwngmn Boecn rnbe °ie Haare Chronology of Events Palma #"im marnaos The Sanitation Districts discovered that bacterial concentration limits were exceeded at one to Nerpvrt eeacn two sampling locations in the Boise Chica State Beach,in May,June,Jul and August, 1995. '•r `•Nov 6onga P 9 R Y. 8 ; a,a>,wacanoa+` <sanra ana The Sanitation Districts began special sampling to August and September 1995,which w heal Beach e9 g P ri g 0 P included collecting and analyzing surface and 20-foot depth samples offshore of the two Tuai surtzone locations where elevated bacterial concentrations were measured. Analytical results . Yale Pen: showed that the offshore samples had low concentrations Indicating that the contamination is 'be Lima, coming from the beach itself and not a source further offshore. - 'at:orange "tt In October 1995,the Sanitation Districts employed the engineering consulting firm Camp Dresser and McKee Inc. (CDM) at its own expense to evaluate the system. Engineering � �Ata drawings describing the state-owned sewer system and lift stations located within the Balsa Gb®Mean Chica State Beach were checked and dye testing of the system was performed to detect leaks. ,fbWn wore In March 1996,the Sanitation Districts employed a video inspection service at Its own expense N)atm Wawcee to examine the state-owned sewer system along Bolsa Chica Beach. The results of the -`i> Bencn inspection demonstrated that there were 44 breaks or offset joints affecting approximately half of the length of the State Parks sewer system. L On June 6, 1996,Orange County Health Care Agency closed approximately two-thirds of Bolsa Chica State Beach on the basis of continued elevated bacterial counts in surtzone samples collected by the Sanitation Districts and the observed breaks in the Slate Parks's «P'.r sewer system. A Puollc Wastewarer and Endronmenral Management Agency Commate4 M wo[ecOng Ne Enrollment Since 1954 r. Honorable Curt Pringle Page 2 September6, 1996 On June 29, 1996,all but about 1000 feet of Bolse Chico State Beach were opened because the State Parks Service had implemented an interim mitigation plan that met the requirements of the County Health Care Agency and the Regional Water Quality Control Board,and surfzone bacterial concentrations returned to acceptable levels. On August 8, 1996,the entire beach was reopened by the County Health Care Agency and remains open because the interim corrective measures employed by and paid for by the State Parks have successfully reduced surfzone bacterial concentrations to consistently acceptable levels. Prognosis for the Future It is the Sanitation Districts' understanding that the earliest that the sewer system can be permanently replaced is the winter of 1997-98 because of existing budgetary and procurement constraints imposed on the State Parks under existing State law and practice. While the interim solution has successfully reduced bacterial concentrations in the surfzone,it has not solved all of the problems. The State must resort to using wastehauling vacuum trucks to empty waste from some of the lift station storage tanks that are serving as temporary sewage holding tanks. The public is using sinks in the dressing rooms as urinals. We surmise that beach goers are urinating in the surfzone rather than using chemical toilets. While not contributing to fecal ccliform concentrations,these practices are certainly"gross.' The Sanitation Districts is spending approximately$1000 per week in unreimbursed additional monitoring costs because the County Health Care Agency and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board want to ensure the State Parkc _ meeting bacterial concentration standards. If they do not receive this assurance the% -il close the beach. The Sanitation Districts'monitoring effort and expense is expended la allow the State Beach to remain open. Repair to the system is estimated to cost between$1.0 and $1.5 million,depending upon the design of the replacement system. The original system consists of approximately 2 miles of vitrified clay sewer and 7lift stations necessary to carry restroom and snack bar wastes northerly to the local sewer system operated by the Sunset Beach Sanitary District and then subsequently to the Sanitation Districts'regional sewer system. The new system could be simply a direct replacement of the existing design or it could be a more efficient system consisting of only one or two pump stations. That's a life cycle and procurement decision for the State Parks System to make. The Sanitation Districts, at its own expense, has acted as Good Samaritans for over 14 months by providing advice and analytical support to the State in diagnosing the problem and proposing a permanent solution to the leaking State Parks sewer. Sanitation Districts'senior staff have expressed a willingness to refer to its Board of Directors a proposal to help the State further by expediting a project that would provide safe public recreational access to Boise Chico. The Sanitation Districts would help by fast-tracking the design, construction and startup of a replacement sewer system under a reimbursement agreement between the Sanitation Districts and the State Parks System. This offer stands moot, however, until the State Parks system can get authorization to proceed with the sewer system replacement project and specific legislative authorization for a reimbursement agreement. h Honorable Curt Pringle Page 3 September 6, 1996 A fast-track design of the system followed by competitive public works contract bidding and construction will take a minimum of seven months to achieve a minimally operational replacement system and another 3-12 months to complete all construction. State Parks has indicated that they are pursuing two authorization scenarios. The first one would be for FY 97198. Under this scenario,the State indicates that the earliest it can potentially be authorized to proceed with a contract with the Sanitation Districts is July 1, 1997. This implies that the earliest a replacement system could be operating is the first quarter of 1998. Under a second scenario, State Parks would attempt to get emergency deficit spending in current FY 1996/97. Even under this scenario,State Parks estimates authorization would not occur until late in the fiscal year and repairs still would not be complete until late 1997 or early 1998. The Sanitation Districts'continued Involvement in this project Is initiated by our genuine concern for the protection of the environment,as well as our belief that the environment should be enjoyed by our citizens. By keeping the beach open and helping participate in a program that will create future quality sewer service to the beach,we feel gratified that we are good public citizens. I thank you in advance for any assistance you can provide the State Parks and Recreation Department in solving this dilemma and returning Boise Chica State Beach to full and safe operation for the citizens of Orange County. Very truly yours, John Collins Joint Chair Boards of Directors JC.jt nwaooricnwnesorrso®e.�r G1W-2o eo •eRI ,03 :ye UP.iUPIONEER BUSINESS CORPrU 73+OOII03666565 PRGB 01 3i9 uD�c Honorable Curt Pringle Page 3 September 6, 1996 A tast4rack design of the system followed by competitive public works Contract bidding and construction will take a minimum of seven months to achieve a minlmally operational replacement system and another 3-12 months to complete all construction- State Parkvhas Indicated that they are pursuing two authorization scenorlos. The fast one would be for FY 97/98. Under this scenario,the Slate Indicates that the earliest it can potentially be authorized to proceed with a contract with the Sanitation Districts s July 1, 1997. 7'hs implies that the earliest a replacement system could be operating is the first quarter of 1998. Underasecond - -- -- - Scenario,State Parks would attempt to get emergency deficit spending in Current FY 199M7. Even under this scenario,State Parks estimates authorization would not occur until late In the fiscal year and repairs still would not be complete unlit late 1997 or early 1998. The Sanitation Districts continued invoNement in this project is initiated by our genulno concern for the protection of the environment,as well as our belief that the environment should be enjoyed by our citizens. By keeping the beach open and helping participate in a program that will create future quality sewer service to the beach,we feel gratified that we are good public citizens. I thank you in advance for any essstance you can provide the State Parks and Recreadon Department in solving this dilemma and returning Boise Chlea State Beach to full and safe operation for the citizens of Orange County. Verybulyyours, r-h'C'O rectors JC-.jt •vxoorran¢.mammei, Key Participants: Jack Roggenbuck,District Superintendent Orange Coast District State of California Department of Parks and Recreation 3030 Avenida Del Presidente San Clemente,CA 92672 Phone: 714-366-08529 - - Donald H.Ito, Park Superintendent Orange Coast District-North Sector State of California California Park Service 18331 Enterprise Lane Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Phone:714-847-8661 Larry Honeybome County Health Care Agency 2009 E.Edinger . Santa Ana,CA 92705 714-667-3750 Steve Mayville California Regional Water Quality Control Board 3737 Main Street Suite 500 Riverside,CA 92501-3339 909-782-4130 Nancy Wheatley County Sanitation Districts of Orange County PO Box 8127 Fountain Valley,CA 92728 714-962-2411 x 3500 Btu 14:3927 -> 714%203% aDriala Mclutym Page Eel Mr 36-96 FRl 12:39 P. 01 CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION of SANITATION AGENCIES -+� Ct 926 LSVxSSuire 1490 ti..m nu,UA96814 TXID(916)446418b8-PAX(916)4484908 . w ❑ATE August 29. 1995 aOCIIASL P.arLLON Rncaar.D'u W& smm Lrn;=ma.e M.om TO: CASA Member Agencies A RMrAL LARSON a.rrnxP.zw,ms.vr°;n FROM: Mike Dillon & Bobbi !arson SUBJECT. CONFERENCE COMMITTEE ON CONSTITUTION REVISION NOT P.a<ianAt RECOMMENDING LOCAL CHARTERS MoN L woeaRUPP county sv Wu Dt• d orm6a umty The Senate-Assembly Conference Committee on SCA 39 (Kiilea) has completed its 901 B,mA ru,er AV,rro - o v.w93M6 review of the recommendations of the California Constitution Revision Commission (T14)5°01 (CCRC) and has selected several proposals for inclusion in the proposed uAs(n4) ` constitutional amendment. The requirement that each county establish a local cHAfiL&&jpy"g Community Charter Commission will not be part of the package this year. CASA Krone samruy a.,ne and other special district associations had opposed the CCRC's recommendation Epp paNdm 56e°` that these commissions constitutionally issi bmandated for several reasons: N M w949fs tass)mrar0w lane vAHae„ • The composition of the local charter commissions was skewed in favor of caenLorrs 70w SEND cities and counties, to the disadvantage of special districts anti school Cumc�An+wutrwtra Dist districts. PBO"1W , •The CCRC n4m•v.w.,n.A4<xY proposal would have required the number of local governments to be reduced by 10% without regard to whether the reduction would result in DrRP�A>'L4Rc6 improved service or reduced costs. JAl(ES a.Rawer a,w sn�m •Significant state-mandated costs would be incurred by the local s'•""`""a""`y governments to pay for the charter process. dRFPRRj'G aAN8SN The proposal takes development of procedures for reorganization and 6naw4mNecrPaARvaP boundaries of local governments out of the hand of L.AFCO. Cmwlcmw Ce,L s mwr nm a RONALO R YOONO Under the latest version of SCA 39, the only local governmentprovisions included am 1)to require the Governor and the Legislature to develop and adopt a comprehensive realignment plan and 2) to add stronger "home rule" language, which affects cities and counties. The recommendations included in SCA 39 are xsre sAPmsrRrN summarized in an attachment to.this memorandum. PMervr ID�,tmtv0 Aa.a<.� ENBRco rs 118acann<ttYmt Are.,v.w. With Saturda}�s deadline for adjournment looming, it is still unclear whether the W.0' 0 scaled-back constitutional amendment has the necessary support w,u,+n9�.�c.zw.w ry PPort to be placed an fM)�-1» the supplemental ballot in November. In any case, none of the provisions currently included in the measure have direct implications for CASA agendas. 88/38/96 14:49:53 -> 7149GMS6 Donald McIntyre Page 881 RUG-30-96 FRI 12:49 P. 01 CCRC Recommendations to Include in a 1996 SCA 1) Executive Branch: a) Authorize the governor and lieutenant governor to run on the same ticket; allow the governor to appoint the lieutenant governor to an executive branch position. b) Abolish the Board of Equalization and merge it with the F'ranchise Tax Board; keep an elected appeals body. --- - 2) Legislature: Authorize six-month sessions with the remainder of the year devoted to interim studies and oversight. 3) State Budget: a) Require the governor to submit, and the Legislature to adopt, long-term goals and performance measures in the budget process. b) Require adoption of a four-year state infrastructure plan. c) Require the state budget to be balanced with a two percent General Fund reserve- d) Restrict external borrowing to finance a deficit 4) Schools: a) Remove mention of the county superintendent of schools and state board of education from the constitution. b) Add languagc giving incrcascd local control to school boards and local citizens (comparable to "home rule' language)- 5) State-Local Relations: a) Require the governor to submit a comprehensive realignment plan to the Legislature by January 1998. b) Require the Legislature to adopt a comprehensive realignment plan by July 1, 1998. c) Add stranger "home rule"-language to the constitution. August] 19% - Guidelines for Public Agencies Regarding Ballot Measures September 1996 General Rule — Information, Not Advocacy Public agencies may not spend money to support or oppose ballot measures placed before the electorate. It is permissible, however,for public agencies to take a position on a ballot measure and educate the public on the measure,its impacts and the agency's position. Information provided by a public agency must be accurate and balanced and represent supporting as well as opposing views. Permissible Activities It is generally accepted that public agencies may take the following steps regarding a ballot measure: • Incur expenses to analyze a measure and its impacts. • Adopt a formal position in support of or in opposition to a measure. • Notify the public, media and others of the agency's position through news releases, bulletins or other vehicles that are informational and balanced but do not advocate a yes or no vote. . • Prepare and distribute factual, balanced information on a ballot measure to the public and other organizations. Material distributed should represent both pro and con viewpoints in a fair manner. • Respond to inquiries from the media, the public or other organizations on the impact of a measure. • Participate in forums or debates on a measure if all views are represented. • Sponsor forums or debates on a measure if all views are represented. If only one side is able to attend, agencies should be prepared to document that the other side was invited. • Agency staff and elected officials may meet with newspaper editors and other groups to objectively explain a measure's impact on the agency. • Elected officials may participate in forums or debates and advocate a position if it is made clear that they are acting in a personal capacity and not at a public agency's expense. Prepared by the Association of California Water Agencies 910 K Street,Ste 250,Sacramento,CA 95814 916/441-4545 Prohibited Activities Under state law, public agencies may not: • Spend money to clearly advocate a yes or no vote on a ballot measure. • Contribute to campaigns supporting or opposing a measure. • Expend funds for printing, office supplies or staff time in support of or opposition to a ballot measure. Additional Guidelines • Timing. To avoid the appearance of advocacy, public agencies should be sensitive to the timing of mailings or other activities.Any items mailed in the last two weeks before an election may raise a red flag. • Intent. Agencies should be careful to avoid the impression that materials are being sent to the public to advocate a yes or no vote. Any information piece, when taken as a whole, must not appear to be an advocacy or "campaign" piece. • Full disclosure. Public agencies should ensure that any materials produced provide a factual and complete representation of the ballot measure and its impacts. • Choosing a vehicle. While it is permissible to produce special publications or materials, public agencies may wish to use existing newsletters or other communications vehicles to educate the public about a ballot measure. • Disclaimers. In addition to complying with all of the above guidelines, public agencies may wish to include a disclaimer on any printed materials. The disclaimer may state that the material is being provided for information purposes only and is not meant to advocate a yes or no vote. Consult Legal Counsel Public agencies should consult their legal counsel for guidance on any activities relating to ballot measures,particularly printed materials distributed to the public. Prepared by the Association ofCahfomia Water Agenda 910 K Street,Stu 250,Sacrunento,CA 95814 916/441.4545 Voter Approval for Local Government Taxes. 218 Limitations on Fees, Assessments, and Charges. Initiative Constitutional Amendment. Argument in Favor of Proposition 218 VOTE YES ON PROPOSITION 218. IT WILL GIVE YOU TAXPAYERS HAVE NO RIGHT TO VOTE ON THESE THE RIGHT TO VOTE ON TAX INCREASES! TAX INCREASES AND OTHERS LIKE THEM Proposition 218 guarantees your right to vote on local tax UNLESS PROPOSITION 218 PASSES! ineremes—even when they are called something else, like Proposition 218 will significantly tighten the kind of benefit 'assessments"cr'fees"and imposed on homeowners. assessments that cars be levied. Proposition 218 guarantees your right to vote on =as Here are examples of why fees and assessments and other imposed on your water,gas,electric,and telephone hills. nonvoted taxes are so unfair: Proposition 218 does NOT prevent government from raising ' The poor pay the same assessments as the rich.An elderly and spending money for vital services like police, fire and widow pays exactly the same on her modest home as a education. If politicians want in raise taxes they need only tycoon a mammon. convince local voters that new ta:••are really needed. ' There are now aver 6,000 local districts which eon impose Proposition 218 simply extends the long standing tees and assessments without the tamest of nasal voters. Special over 1te have increased cities cr aver constitutional protection an approval. against politicians imposing tea 2408% over 16 years. Likewise, cities have increased increases without voter approval. utility taxes 416%and raised benefit assessments 976%,e After voters passed t allowsth m politicians erected a ten-ficid increase. loophole ro the law that allows them to roue taxes without services Non-voted taxes on electricity, gas, water, and telephone voter approval by calling faxes tad, one law and"teem services hit renters and homeowners hard. Once this loophole was created," , one lawyer working with he And,retired homeowners get hit doubly herd! politicians wrote, assessments "are now limited only by the To confirm the impact u fees and assessmentslist f you,look at limits of human imagination yoursed ri tax bill.You will see a growing list of assessments How imaginative can the politicians be with assessments? =posad without voter approval.The list will grow even longer Here are a few eaam les among thousands: tuiless R°poscnon 21g paves. P n8 Proposition 218 will allow you and your neighborsalnot • A view fax m Southern California—the the better the view of those who pa Betide how high your dazes will be. y will allow the Deem you have the mare you pay. Chose who pa assessments to decide H what they are being • In Los Angeles,a proposal for assessments for a$2-million asked in pay for is worth the cast. scoreboard and a $6-million equestrian center to be paid FOR THE RIGHT TO VOTE ON TAXES, VOTE YES ON for by property owners. PROPOSITION 218. • In Northern California, taxpayers 27 miles away from a JOEL FOR park are assessed because their property supposedly Presiders Howard Jarols Tarpayen Aamelare. benefits from that park. JIM CONRAN • In the Central Valley, homeowners are assessed to Preeidmi,Censamera First refurbish a college football field. RICHARD GANN President,Ponl G.I.Citizens CammiHee Rebuttal to Argument in Favor of Proposition 218 PROPOSITION 218 IS NO FALSE ALARM . . . IT HURTS CONSTITUTIONAL POWER SHIFT. Propositions can deceive,an carefully judge who you believe. Proposition 218 etches this into the stare Constitution: Beware of wild claims for new "constitutional rights"and Blocks 3 million Californians from voting on tax people who pretend concern about widows and orphans. assessments.The struggling young couple renting a small Read Proposition 218 yourself and see how large home,WILL RAVE NO V01'E on the assessments imposed corporations, big landowners and foreign interests gain more on the house they rent. voting power than YOU. Create special land interests more voting power than Promoter say you got-tax reform" . . . you may actually .average homeowners.The "elderly widow"promoters cite get serious cutbacks in local service and FEWER VOTING will be banned from voting if she is a router,or her voting RIGHTS for millions of California citizem. power dwarfed by large property owners. Sometimes we hear hysterical warnings about had things Gives nan-citizens voting rights on your community taxes. that never occur . . . Proposition 218 is a REAL threat. On Proposition 218 is a great deal for wealthy special interests. Proposition 218 consider the berm to EXISTING local services, But it's a bad deal for the average taxpayer, homeowner and not vague future threats: renter. • May reduce CURRENT funding for police, fire and HOWARD OWENS emergency medical programs across California. Congress o(Cdi(ornia Seniors • Worsens SCHOOL CROWDING by making public schools LOIS TINSON pay NEW TARES,cutting classroom reaching. President, CaUfamia Teachers Associaifon • Could eliminate Lifeline utility support for SENIORS and RON SNIDER Pmiderv,California Aaaoeiatian of disabled citizens. Highway Patrolmen 76 Arguments pneted an this page are the opinions of the authors and have not been checked for etewacy by my official agency. G96 Voter Approval for Local Government Taxes. Limitations on Fees, Assessments, and Charges. F2 Q Initiative Constitutional Amendment. O Argument Against Proposition 218 PROPOSITION 218 DILUTES VOTING RIGHTS, HURTS Don't handcuff police and firefighters.The California Police LOCAL SERVICES Chiefs Association, Fire Chiefs Association and California In the disguise of tax reform,Proposition 218's Constitutional Professional Firefighters ask you w vote NO. Amendment REDUCES YOUR VOTING POWER and gives The impartial Legislative Analyst's report shows how huge votingg power to corporations, foreign interests sad Proposition 218 could impede Lifeline support for the elderly waalthY Ind owners. and disabled. It prohibits seniors and disabled from receiving It cute polite.fire.lib park,senior,and disabled services maded utility services unless they pay all meta themselves. and diverts toads neededNr classroom-size reductions. Proposition 218 cuts more than $100 million from local Read Proposition 218 carefully—it's a wolf,not a lamb! seryi.tts yet wasue tam of millions each year by changing the YOU LOSE RIGHTS; CORPORATIONS, DEVELOPERS, Constitution to require 5,000 local elections even if local NON-CITIZENS GAIN VOTING POWER citizens don't want an election . . . even if the election cost is Section 4(e)of Preposition 218 changes the Constitution to more than the potential revenue. gtvo corporations, wealthy landowners and developers MORE MAKES SCHOOL CROWDING WORSE VOTING POWER THAN HOMEOWNERS.It lets laree outside interests control community taxes—against the wiill of local California teachers oppose Proposition 218 became Section citizens, Val imposes a new tax on public school property, diverting EXAMPLE:An oil company owns 1000 acres,you own one mesons from classroom programs to pay for non-school arts; the oil corporation gets 1000 times more voting power expGO8Ps. then u_ California already has the most crowded classrooms in While Prop. 218 gives voting power to outside interests, America (dead last of 50 states). Proposition 218 makes school Section 4(g) denies voting rights W more than 3.000,000 mos'ding worse. California renters. SHELL GAME Reducing American citizens'Constitutional rights, it grants This measure takes a few good ideas,but twists and perverts voting rights to corporations and abcentee landowners—even them. It nipples the best local services and puts more power foreign citizen. into the hands of special interests and non-citizens. EXAMPLE:A shopping center owned by a foreign citizen is Proposition 218 goes too far. Assessment laws DO need worth 100 times as much as your home; that person gets 100 improvement,but Proposition 218 is the wrong way to do it It times more voting power than you! does more harm than good, restricting our voting rights, Every citizen should have the right to vote if a community is hurting schools,senior and public safety programs. voting on local assessments for police, fire,emergency medical Please vote NO on Proposition 218. and library Programs. It's unfair to ve voting power to non-citizens, big landowners and developers, yet deny it to FRAN PACKARD millions of Califb n . Pneid."I<agae of Women Voters ofCuBfbr MAY CUT LOCAL POLICE,FIRE PROTECTION CHIEF RON LOWENBERG Section 6(b)(5) eliminates vital funding sources for local Pn,ident,California Police Chiefs'Areociallon police,ire,emergency medial and library services. CHIEF JEFF BOWMAN Proposition 218 goes too far—ma forbid emergency Pnatden,California Fire Chiefi'Aasacietion smanaments for earthquakes,foods and fires. Rebuttal to Argument Against Proposition 218 Arguments against Proposition 218 are misleading and Under Proposition 218,officials must convince taxpayers that designed to confuse voters.In truth: tax increases are justified. Politicians and special interest 1. Proposition 218 expands your voting rights. It groups don't like this idea. But they can't win by saying CONSTITUTIONALLY GUARANTEES your right to vote attaa4meers to ers oulcon�a simd te on =ationso they use misleading on tames. That question: DO YOU BELIEVE TAXPAYERS SHOULD 2. Under Proposition 218, only California registered voters, HAVE THE RIGHT TO VOTE ON TAXES? If you answered including renters, can vote in test elections. Corporations yea'.VOTE YES ON PROPOSITION 218. and foreigners get no new rights. Read the nonpartisan, independent SUMMARY by the 3. Current law already allows property owners, including Attorney General which beggiina "VOTbEy all memis cited R APPROVAL FOR nonresidents, to all on property sssessments based on the �N'GOVERNMENT now.Then youll knowthe truth,3�us assessment amount they pay. This is NOT created by property tax bill,due out now.Then you FOR THE RIGHT TO VOTE ON TAXER, VOTE YES ON Proposition rates PROPOSITION 218! 4. Lifeline"rates for elderly sad disabled for telephone, g ,a sad electricre services a NOT affected. CAROL RO83,VANS 5. Proposition 218 allows voter approved Cases for police, fire, Vlee•Pretfden;California T Poyen Aaeoeiadon education. FELICIAELEINSON Proposition 218 simply gives taxpayers the right to vote on Past President.Council o(Sacra M. taxes and stops politicians'end-rum around Proposition 13. Senior Organisations That's why ordinary taxpayers, seniors, parents, LEE?HELPS homeowners, renters, consumer advocates, support Founder,Alliance of C.Ujfhrata Taspnyen Pmposition 218. and lnootoed Voters(ACTIV) G96 Arguments printed an this page are the opinions of the authors and have not been checked for accuracy by any official agency. 77 composed as ifrhe turnover wssa u4dm final[0.yam. Sections. Allaadon ofrtwvur/am.^salted coeemmea. (e) Then dull h impoW fin ewh meek less upon the weber inane of every esuu. Section 1W3 or the Rewnm od Tuedan Cam 4 graded to read ML Of aprmon tint furl wars equal to the enhance Cenppnd utsdr abdivisian del fin an 15603. %I.) Ercepe w promises in rWdiwion to). he bJa.m of W rovers,in the Individual having the swrc.of waded.,wom. Personal In.Tx Fad shall upon order of the Canmlkr,be dawn tlwafaho far tee (0 Th w capered by Ws pan is m o seas random of acting refund, under ft pan in h transferred ro the Geaml Food.All (1)(1)Seniors I B)of dos Imaval Rewme Cod.among ter cocain uwmed imvme of michwrd ufud wsa m,:hall be ndepwited Iv f Personal[.cons Tx Fad We miner children wed as iltlu pant i iacwrs.shall apply ewcpI is ahawisa provided mdpr by tls Co stem.. (2)Section IISN711BM81(III often Internet Revenue Code.achtiog to income included on (b) (I) !AI Sabres no dart oAwddn required b,ubli a y vh IBA ve Overseas,I aI pmcnt's muse h mdifred fee pwpowe of W,pm.by wbsuaeng"fire dollars mr for such/4ml woe then 4 header deposited in her Lain Agenq Fud fia i..AnVOw "Win Y.Gw dallws 1S751"we"I pertrat"fin"IS Fret." rrkith 4 Farb,pm,d a he Gressel Finest Min udd4nnef amahu aJpenaul income has (hl For east rxobk yew beginning an or after lenuuy I.1986.tlx Fawku The BmN owner.sqw is sul4ccrd Jar he knowned,preadoor tusbf,mar a,u areal,of the shall rrorepwe the raceme tax bractns emrvhd in subdivitiom dal and (c).Thai ummdnnu to Swim/70e1 issue by the shown howni.e eddny Mq sabdrwsnn newe ..in=.shall be rode w folkwa: aanms in nsnenn eh rwo hishun plane!income der mna 111 The Cali'amia Depmmer of IodunnJ Reluior shall vaneWr aonuallY to the (8)Newvhwwinx mywbarpan+inn of law.mrsnmwv nsubngJ,he mtwrr Frrmhiu Tu Bead dos pvrmege tluvge n dos CaliforJa Cawmv Prix Intlu err all Whatevera&I.,IA4 subdhatim in he actions,4....dominant pmdnt neWand by iuw faro lam ofrh pdw derlVym to hum WMecmmt akdar yew.relam than Smim 8OfAr4dr XVl oJeh CWsJoraier Cmniwuan wed.gin pfrmmsinR w,we shag be Aogm l of the ascent dedm ymr. fudedf muradius.in net arose,elder deposit ale.wasaaed b,rvbeagsuph MI (2) De Faohiu T.Bond sbJ1 da bosh of dos fallowing: In me,vent shall ran sruasom inuradw adding this uadirkim areas in u level of ware IAICampuu an I MGM Lee adjusmeofacer by adding I W .at as the peaeenwee rduraimulJnaw ,der 41ui ahun My dew!ofsme some.fodie,ahutx.w waurn tlhoge filluse Over is farmers punuvv,to psnPaph(I)ad NNding the awls by 100. the anow,n/tlte,moon. (B) Multiply th,preceding rouble yea income w twWom by me iMotim adjustment (2)la ao5 p.whl ran,h NO amowa uJ manwd the 4 kenaled n ch LsaW A,I form derrWmd in eM1pmYapM1(A)ad round off Ne rruWng Padvers m the hhwt am F4su/generation Accoan,p✓nmry as paaeaph fit it Arab,ippapnred no the dolor(SD. Canrmller Jar appnnionmm,amon8 all cmnda in he 1.1.Based upon inJnmrmrm (1) (11 Farppwwppoow.ftJmm rh ten"CaefwJa adlumd gain iumner"iwlwer prorled br th Oepuamrm✓lpinme.ch Cachal4rshu11 malemappmianmenr on in ads a the fiat nF whunn in waorduw,,e ab can propnnsm thin sh reel ammt of...argasmd m be IAI Fin anY pan afth Lvdble sxa dorivg wMNw wapaYa wwaaddem of Wss�u .Aped Jvr,h pmr/iuW rmrJmm dl load u8em4r in th.anrvPwa nauh eg5eniau fss B)For by Savors thenh N cumdi Wjw hi gm,cumin.rtghers nesown. .11 ad he,,bran rn eh sera[amowe mq✓snd ao nt,hpas for M,prior Jual rear ve✓ (BI For uY Pint ss the umber year I= watch on wpayer was rot o mident Its this primps home ante Ma red far chr Par l ogeainee M.state sorp✓rpom idierta Maneuver sae.alYdteee items of adjacent home wkdswaetldwtl from sauw various this ancom feerft aarsMmamroehpaa he s......Mr.caMln sbllnducr Me road sou.rkmmiod to orwdevm with Ouwr II lammendo8 wish Smash r reservoirs .. u Harvard mvn he,con. .araU 1.W w esew 35 a amu bm1 rural umam of eD Ran pin any of rompwng"Call mina adjmd code incase"rode paragraph 1 d arwnue ullwoud re abbe,rhn0 purrmro Ice bnien JS uJAnide rwa vase,Cull aid( she smouwofany 0opmenelm terminal in antusest year dung der pan of"ad .'a".I..haddwll✓4e adorethe,adf so n/sAp mxnwse..p l allloaw! the A) The,was nos o rehMo of reds are ehvl the houses o a e sum of W fallowing: .we in Mo nee.wa Me soh[✓hmnt/meat aerated in de aha panums In.,hit ,hit (AI The smounttraid of the loss wtnbutable to she pm of W inset year in which Me same st hall be de pmted it,EwA nature omuw,meirov by a rmnn panums o M e wpaye win a rtddeu anise hall an .Fa,loed br o whsrah hhzs n'm Provided in Smion J0.aJ seer IB LTheI$wwbwdd Me lmwMJLdoing thpanndshuaabkyeushe weaver isms FW onew 1ww I,need I.rpwen nJM4uddie G. "load CauT'Aw,h same maninxu aide,is dmiWuek h Califomid uwwh iwame ends hWnious ellowaeer in wnvin8 w thus rear mho is whin Se.pw JIXfo rs,,San Go Crld o Cud,. adjusted!IIm tea ma dal La Orin,corm nJ your people fors,Smr of C.No a in rnmcsnx ed upon only)an !l1e b re i,it nJMep ry nofrtivShore of CWifomn in names the uhrndmrmro vote ahurcprnmwl inwhmeruaennu.d<nwesfroahweontrun'b natemly,h I..I.haGhvrhnmmon initiative Ourvo art rowan✓.cold marsnor very Arthuriwume wppayea✓,h,may flowes,lerstowndinrbelww brnnyaieNbe incoor a IM or that../ear .nowerwryhighen inmmm cupa3xnr 0 bedJd arArn4r 0iekw teard.1 ohm tervrsmeifurWnB buNm.aM thrrtbrullw,hnrr uR,m4r sapin4/fap4 noNrr srRmerau cAwe mxme+twcunwnlapravldea Avsc luelafgW hoStudos. Theulpsrbdererv4xs. alumaraftwSwar of CaAenwriawowa/ulll[iuwher , her saa.I�4Mesnrow.a, Studios. The legifktwe meY Furl 1h16 mash.oely by]lmwl<.pwfM in acM1 prop4 lMe Stine of Culi/emw tAw anyfuart enactmrw,,bar Wsen the are.6w.,der Mssu of the legislasuu byaaolgisds von.Ws4 amismswiN xdfoMr,dos puaosw buNm rJM,rmeprno,W imamwu4urmoinroin,hu lewlandpmponiorwu.Aare a/ of it Iofr Nowem.d urhe waited of amreeawayofmrds house Of a&,t timed Jam car A7da/carom m+aue pmwided Jarb7 rh Humors nir4sive Secvav d al Nis mssm wide she approrJ of only a tm)ItnrY of eoch hoax of the aM'nR the rnbG'v4nn. legislmve. Proposition 218:Teat of Proposed Law This initiative menus is submitted a the people in'ererdada with the orspecial tam.Speaidpurpnre,derma or agencies.amount,school dsnr4u,shall how Ira dArtiele II,Serie.8 of the Conservation.seiation. mpawrr an lm rearal hose. nitiative demure expressly amends the Constitution by adding artidn fir? Nn 4calsmemnmumnimpoa m.n4 ar inrarue ms Henralwmlm od mail thence;thesefare,new proeisiau paphaed u be added are printd in 4o/ia type aAuw asulawasedsorhe Jecer.ad.,watedbru ma/nnn sw.A gm,.1 oushu/low te indicate that they on new. be Owned as hurt have ncreasedaria 4 imponda,a war we lu'ghn rim rh ohsanuor ear PROPOSED ADDITION OF ARTICLE XID C Orapprowd The denine"and hY M4 swaivir.chuff be maaWaud in a ngunrlr AND ARTICLE XIII D uAeduled 6mral rIrcnaa fee members of,A,gvivaing bode nJMe twat trove o. incept In curs,y'seargmr declared bra umn1..mar nfah,g awwn,,bad,.. RIGHT TO VOTE ON TAXES ACT (dAn,Senator eu iepowd seeded as wavard written,serad rvwd4 by mr 1.1 SECTION I. T Then an"I be news ad be cisa as Me"Right to Va, govrenmry we ns after/man 1.1995.and Pa.,,.,&dencene dour 4hav artrde.+hull m Term Ace" mry gm whereas in br imparal We i)rapprowd by a majubr rear 4the savers rang in an a/aim SECTION 2. FINDINGS AND DECLARATIONS. The le of th Sute of maw 4sw fulassepnstlm,wArN e4Nm.hu8 he held with.nvo lean nJMe eye.. CaefasJe find and declare,elm dPwP din,uJtks article and in romplsamr with subdivision III h,ueY ProgniWv l3 eau inudd a Rorrdee8ectiww (d)Nolad,Rawmmehhurdwtear.mad w4.naarmverecnfruwleuatdumd celi,f and a r,q.ia wren.pleaded of an I..,.Nowemr,local gowmmevrt be . Maw,4 subJd(rd,o the e4ro weer adappawdb)'.evoeitbtlr.nee A several w chuff subjected wpaym to excessive the,ssuumaL far and charge increases that nos Italy mebrd,.d,n hex bee rmnwN iJass wanted at a sear me high,haware miumwa hucrate the putpo,u ns sup of va eroal for anroeessd.but also Water the ecmomic roe so approaE. secunryofall CaOfmmins and Ne Cabfwnis carom,used.This mama pa.rupayen SEC. J. Inchon, Pon,, Jar Leal Tue,. Arersmeara Fee and Charge,. by theater the meWds by which Irtd govvwmnu am seams hem tupayee witlwut Nwwith ca dinR aar weer pav4am of sbit Conceited..imadfi. ,bin,w,limited ro. sties,canes. Sewoa 8od9/Arsine Achr nunent awarsAWl mr br prodinedor whervtrr lihuN SECTION 3. VOTER APPROVAL FOR LOCAL TAX LEVIES. Article Xlll C is n marten Of reducing as m ling one k a."""ummt fee er course are penew of added to f California Cowin tion In tad: snu4dex 1.ogee Intl are.damn;,..fen ad durge ehJl be applicaale era all dual AR77CLE)ON C gowmmechsuse a an"the L.'ara n,,tor ant low/fowmment.damnebllamperes,a SECTION 1. L4prMsau As wed in seat aedan. tgRsavar threaten,higewasanrAu nperfimbfe sa nuvasd,noway crown.. fad "Gm,altu'mroumTru impwedJar seam[grovrtmtesea/puspnm. SECTIONS. ASSESSMENTAND PROPERTY RELATED FEE REFORM. IN Article msua aq cowry.care cny wit rouncc iwbdinqu droner sin Article)GO D is added to fh Colifum4Cowtiadan to rod rcmtyr dart sprnol dimia,armrmhr soul der n8irma/gowmmrnhl,win. a fit 'Spr.io/dsmue"mtwu ra a,'goath run""Pa,Punaam ro'.ma few or a ARTICLE Sail D 8peddaa forrAevas imudiamee,nowwaromat sirloin! anau.ihbens., SECTION I. Apral,acart NomMnmat, ..jho,,, inm✓Jnmshrpmv4iu ,,. grereace baundanu iulding,bvs rvu fisebed ta,rMaW G'nnn+and ndrvdnpmme Mu ankle shall opphi ar elf wmrmnu/ra and adrxes, nhh er kk awApmmm�l m aBmdn din,aroma.m tile[gnwsrmene Manes awhunn.Naming n sN)un41r wAnidr Xlll C (it)re tpur ,oi mach anY w s was ad Jw edfunspmefwre,arc/Wing o and amaa ed +ell Phase, a ea; far EC,Z pLevele.ab4h 4 r I.L nun d(Vowed funs, (o) Paver✓nr.,howhnmv as um,een.r td(mast d(h.aanrea Jre. nine o SEC 2 Level Gu.tmmmr I.(imirorim NnwithnalinR mT mherpmrisnnu th4 (al re evriefee lawn/w4 rn,hi Cmnimia. J prepem derr/rymm4. g mpo,irinn n/lee or chugn u u aondinm o/ III All lees npmeby any Intel Rawamreashull lr Memsd an beeuirr,....Isom fc)Vern e4n/ng have rbsinR ro let imp✓r4/m fandr,rob arms 108 G96 SEC. 2, afinieWx. Ar rood m d.moil" mn be ienpaard mrrlie uppmvre M✓m✓-M m,r em nJW Wnrnnte in Me dinnn m lal "ANM "Mmx one local Ronromeu at define in+ohdivuim fbl f Swim/M addition ra Miru WpnnN by Wpn ,moomnumpninik rWA'Wionfw Ametr Xlll C SEC. S. Efl trod Ooa. Puvmx m cobdnirton lal MSarinn 10 MAnidr/l.the Ibl "Anrumrni meow am UvrwrMom urym m/pmmr!rinmaRmn'l ra mmia/ pmrinm MlAn,nrclr+MY beromr r�nirr ell doe eher Mr e4nWn unlru nraerMine Mnr/b conferred upon he real p.,rit "Asdnmm,"include,,but U rear limited m. prmidrd.Br,wo,IWJ 1.1997..11 enaelpg,term or in[nmed wmrme Mail rwy( ",mend avn omo. "Dmefir mnm mrx+ame. mainremnn 1"a '"pedal rieA ells unity.bhow"'aNin,"jamda t,rM fill wlnq av nrmenn.+icon,m the mrramm,roc. effe riv dose of Mu oracle cW be wdmpfinew rM pm'Num oM appmwl potion ter Jet 'Corindmn"mmuWcM•/ocquuirim.iuealWrim mMrvxW.rtrancrmbn forth,an Smim J: monument Ma pemom "wili[impmvrmem br m agency. fah Mr muarmu wywN r+dwiny r✓flwr[e Me mpiml[wu✓rmwemue am wldl "pinndr"mmx m om dercmmrd by w aRenn ro rovain d/re wAnb wilt •prmcron eWexul•+Wew/M.nma rmrrt.mew flood room(amount,meem or mnwa ryenalbmr/ulmmapmpwedpublic impmnmrm urpmpermnMN,ruin. rotor round Saturation''inure to inch wnamenn mall&nbdm ro rM pm[Nurm (q Fn"nr"cMBi mrwumi Uy.Neem,or am.rulam aroc mender of mate I urn no in Section J. mmecup..impdN b.un agency char ,faparrupmepenmmea imiGm•Jpmprm. Wpm. P. /e naip. iuman Rau+rrJeewinamu a pmprmnwndforte. mo Mtmrcamhe cmucmr.at, wopnieian aRn1.Imma+r+oeu,Mmi,gall of 14 (a -Main.foci. aNWrmim mpeuen,mm.a ell rote of me,repair, it no,arde a. ,mInro'he aneameu ai rbe rime ode 'he P—e U imuWHY=mode P "Sabatini. u upon, am r pomc r .,Pouruertm,mee,and roprnirinn mrxnx ra pmpen�• axmnd in+wh uurammu cAWI M rubkn en rM pm[N,m xW appotrn/prvicen m o (NJ 'a mar.inaprnmmralpbe dommpronmmu knhan, as J. IRl a mpam,Maine.,rob MdnmdmimWderge.. Mm/pmpem MMrrt Iw AnS muumem the pm[rcdd if whichma art eulmirrp need m rcparm law emwnart die ih liable rn pnrW amcorreu(n,wrMBe in yueaim. CiammumuJMirhrMJuiWu ro pnrwwld nolmrsMC✓nrmn lmpimms[Wu,eMW fm "Pmymehip. ud nrvin'metro a public nrvin bring a dirt,re/eeinuhip m [mnieAW MMr Um,which po p W "ewml bear air An mcenmenr which from i f it. mejenrr mrrr Wpmml/mot sM mum fit 'Special if un f min a panimeel,r uN.nano brook,note we above paednf voting in an r4nim m ell Udla M rM aaeamrnr. Subnqurnr armor in 4. bdeeelu,dmlemdmnalantedrt hated inW dst cialrn MrpvblUUWBr.Wmml Melancholia., inoba Sienna d mAmamex nonimmrt T.11. AImumroe..Few, Charles SEC Q PmprrrY ErWM fro aN CMTer. (al Pmndurci/or Ntwminreemrd SEC. i FF pem Tmw. he.,.,it fro aS, CMBn firmed., foul mo rot, fit and Choler. ,afnsro rdlt hallow sM pm[Non+punwu ch rain nmMn is W7 my,hhe,teron.. rAWIMearallormY ue.p: wY paminJpmpom'•u eatfienR terfommURailed or dacBemdefine punuane an MU ani[le,achdag,bx up on my pemnumimidmro/preprm munhy ruxW: wfit rn.rMfo/bwnK l/I TM ndnemm pmprutt. 1himsrat Pa roAnile Eil 4.fActvac XX111 fll /Ms,of be pm wbhAahe mall",ii pnrpmNhd inameeanhANMr thulle (B)Anrrp wouas rrcrided y Mu conic rote punmxmSwMnJMAnide ElllA The amotm a be cir or Prortr pm . ra M imputed open each ft, rl+all be fdl Fees oruwapmvWNco-mend je am exceed BM chall opmadde were[ii mbr radial eerpmpr.N/e w[hareca ( ica jaa Mm,lorpmpem mxN,rrvimmpmiGd by rM toddle. ell roue owner Memaidex Npamel upm which Me/m nrrM.BdUpxpo,N far (blforpocprar MehU anlle/eion pmvufwrJWmnml ur 8mnnicuAall rear wichA. the amnwoopmiturarAemrpmpoadm Mimpud.Wmeaomfo M,Uupm M drcmNcwmunrlwd end Remanlmiew alpmprrrcnnrn(a) MWidhW am✓meMthe pnWa+N/rdthemoormacaiMckwor ell"aeon Jar rer/xor SEC. J. Pmrrdum aNBnntidma/all Mande nick will fahe.aarmY which cam.mgnhv wirA the dme.ewe•adW[axm Mapublie hmnnRmWpmpotedJrcw peopan+loUrr'he wndnoun which Wmeh�Wlpamewl be willMrrucpoinu MnaPo l (2) mnjernd open,hem and upon whir.m w+ndmrnr will M impend.7/u prop✓mmme 1]1 IDr ogemy rMll<oNun a public Frannr upon rM Pnpurd(n n.rMBe nw lee dprcial brnek derived by m[h idemilrN pvml rAdl M darminrd in rt/oMndAip rn roe sMn JS NY+MUr mNWR rM rode n/rM pmpurdl r v cMTe m rM roue owmn M of.public me,uJi nmxrAr maiummnc,home nmoca.No heading. ehe iiiMoponwhica Wd/rr nrcMReUph,Ponaamfice or ow. publrc ...public impmmm�e or rM me, 1 which .,,&miumd the rim MMR pmart 4 No heading.opiu mq rMN warder or pmr+u maour rM potxued/rc✓r,fimm re of e mamunc mall bo enefilminon .ten eof Pared word.ondrdr the reef,.a err nJ the pmaa eRaiuc ah .,bocNlu w unno wr pm or tea Die u mlonry Mermen of Me pmpanioem ,MidI benpie mMeNeu an Wmfi.l.Onfp,pmial MnMm un mrraable. WexefirdppmU.eM1e ugm�dMll rem impnn Wrhe or ulrrBr. aNm aannn ounhou.panrrrAeanerm/bea,aJ therpenal Mn�u[m/rmdma (i R k examated for Eaang, omufIncnm..Fed aN Ct. l fad ourfMBe MnNPam4wi,mall one her nwudormmmi mrawu}eM Axe MCWvian, "meM McNed impocN orinmarcdbvmrogmnwlea iemnuWl Meae/ollawinq eMUMNAxr+nta/IrorMuat Au ardramnrxdraWnjitet nndemusnrr Ieq(1) bydlmraN nmvin[inq rvidrmdrAx rhmep✓bfi[Iv ewnrdpomUinJan'renirrmryrria/ 1/1porr ete+urd comm. elljrc nrdMmcMUroeenmd rMkNr ngarmdwpmaid bmrke the2)R,, remadwelfrc. fbl All araamma,MEMnpfed kvbradrmifrCoMmni+rtpun pnpaM bra (L,whakh+drmnrcomic krmrMmdMllnm MmeeJnr mY pugnn man Man rteJteredpmJednoml mBWer nnfN by the Aare of CWiJonm, rM(/o.wAica shehrwMam wen irrywdN Jet la amame Mlle pmW+Nauu+mru/wearh rem it pomr+Mll Mr imputed fdl TMnmwx me emonow A'co roml /a mroc, mmimWeuM arWWmood ownero/m,Apone/rhaflMBlnreemn.nxfadbymull wo cpmpxre pmpem nwnerMip dMIIw rAmdrM peWnema ma of rM noted MrWwablero Me ,a,& r.rM rwafomr ptAerem domain. rhW entire doma.W✓ ,oh, Trouble paml. 1aduh,ho lfquen YWrpae deumim ulnopaYmmu.rM namekrmermrarere lei Nohroff rMrRr may MhWmNJwa,roars uagaumm.4 cour cln 'chan mrmNo'. and Mo dmU upm wN[h ell ammne Mehe pmpo+ed eta+mvncwmUuWrN,regrew, wimmrW'aulramibDl�rc rM mrmrMMe pmprmagteNan frm urcMTrd bxNm wish rod dx<.rime unelumnm Mapublic MUUH analpmpuNaueamu Each nrvin pormrial or ortimnso Mermdnare rorpdmWl S....nu .and all..be .,,a +MEapletion.ol nupiduom pam ofamJu anmmur McAeproa in monflauh.W. mcMrgn or mnmm�u.iM1allMclm+fodmo,ddddmdnu oN rMll nx MimpnrN rM including a di prom,and�abu....of am Mlber /.ma prep tr in nbdiafm Ido willow roc t inch will Aaim i. dnludinga di,wprrern+emrmem rMr Mr wuten.,hoping espmrn.mddinNm U1NoJnar[MnermbimompmN/Reurn.area eaw..se wlulabill but not ,u id) Each frA will mule in ell neramu roe being impmN 1wnN eo.paltin mica ambrewMe ore mat demo..worn W+enow U,vaWWe ra W N) Emhmri ifmailed nawnenejidmcibm"'he agniy',t"morfor ponmm to ReblUx km inubaan mlYWmmmawra,a Ut amInammmn. ed bulk, frNMEmama a d.lbr-hkheema Wa,ma the ter iaNwnerm map'icte Me Relnumb. mbraninctu�red ampmlam,a[IWi it Mtn.r ,whehem fee aociparit balm mnt.manamobv mYewmrr reni Me un rook,wMrtbr the upprear indicate o mxmay be muieaurl "my mee factor indnacer,fr whether In onerlgMBeir a Mr mmr.nmmumma Wmdfirxem nl Me panel and eU or MruppM ru Wpwuan ra imp g the radio Ma fee- mrl,,.An borprgww be im dar �en one UBW mrinn W pmpoud mrurmeu. muming We a.lWr'rr Make yr cMrgd.ell MNrn cAvE M mW ogmq to 4moMmn fdl after madiWl roNvna pofM Marut oWa erom i in Nana!mmen of Man dwWMme wW rM anicU. iJ dour,her martin,the florin,1 Me pmpond mnumrm m rtcoe ownm o/each Iti Win AWmml hoc N.w bo/tion c rd es. and ,,, n E.rpckr Jm w[Mire Notified panel M eAd public M1mnng.roe agent ml ev remidn off promo aRaiM rhe Jor memo.nun and rMw..olleuian,dream,ro pmpem re1xN n w rAerBe Nod M potpwrd meumm and rabuwe rM bulbu.The aAmO cMY aw wpme m auamtenr iJ impend m innfolu j wler+ae omil rMr/rc ter charcgge U l-oh fic , aWmrrd i n, Wenearound an ptiaa Ann,ahee�p..coca/upon W.noupulo/sM Marine, malonnaweMWpmpmdarteu orapmprm rvbjea rerAein or cMTdecw Ill Where 1. enppNWh ro Mrmda. ball.. .rAe ballaughted ,.oW,. Me WrrmnJrllhe bw conducted min i.awe 4S Mhe rlemmM*pubb,inW,.A.d8m.Thr murmmr. In ,new o1lig he Mlam rAe. !pin rMfl M miBArcd oaoein8 ro Me Mt mill M mudmlN rear I, ran JJ m,i aker sM public Meson.An agmn oral pmponiaml legal .conti n e,ouoJ/mNpmpem. adage pmcNuru+WUWI ro rAou Jw rnammu in aurumur N Me reMun Melewim+ fkln mY 4galaaimawwenBnme,m nMmvaar am" WbwM WrrMmlM man eBeivbn WJuly tre, ro IemMmr rAx W potpdm✓Me tmbliir w 9mem rtwivr e r beenfl,fmi, Idl Beginning July 1.1997.affhu ur rMTxmMll amply ndM hit union. oweand aMnellbreeku[m/dmdoa and Imaour on. aNrMrrocamrrml MunY. Prime mi mamenr U pmponimd roe aN ao Pnxer Mx W Mufiu rnrekrnd m ell SERION J. IA9EEAL IN am piU an of Theloclprovisions of INc uc atoll nd pmpem rca pw may i a W bwane eml ncin ronawN to Wlanmm iu paryous al limiting local gommmem rtnvue and 181 nemwr may area a Mw(m an mew or be demon curer nh t ell Co.,..,. who ere.ECn N 6. rovuee do rear men pmpem wieAa W dYdnn WY roe M/nmd uerr rAv Cuan ro have SECTION b. SEVEEAaaamml ai mY in of Mc uu or pm rMmL is lot and Men deprived^I W nRM m mee/ter of ill"acrnr. Ile corn dMerminec . ail ,roam MN t fa i-mLid 1.a mromt.W to rM anNoPumping mmen shall rot M Wetted.bah ComuurNn oJehr Unbend Seun armor,/rddnl Ww myWm wMmue W mnr,mx Yuen ,lull mroiv in fall fors aN eEm.aN Iv Mrs rod No pmnriom W ells xt m uvxrble. , G96 109 .... ....... _ ___ SEP 11 '96 15:59 FR PIU I cruwv MRDISON 619 236 1995 M le P.02 uN arvlov eT PILLSBURY MADISON SI SUTRO LLP ' Lae nueaee sulT lSao Mww an05 NCN TOalf 0"Nad mu, snCan,ICNTo 101 W ST 9NO .y sµ OI.. n ra.Mclmeo SAN OICOO. C IFORNIA 92101"e219 uN low NneMIMOTON. OC MONO eoNO roeTO TCLCeMONE ISM ZY S000 v�CmlMit6 CSIB) 206•I0a5 NPITEa'm OrrICC nMo olocm euL Nuue[a ' (619) 544-3177 September 11, 1996 VIA FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION TO: ORANGE COUNTY INVESTMENT POOL PARTICIPANTS' DISTRIBUTION LIST Re: In Re County of Orange Case No. 94-22272JR Dear Pool Participants: We continue to monitor the status of various post- confirmation issues in the County's bankruptcy case. with regard to the clams objection process, the County has focused its initial efforts on routine types of objections, for example, claims filed after the bar date, claims with insufficient documentation and claims filed in a blank amount_ The County has filed ten "omnibus" objections and expects to file several more omnibus objections in the next several weeks to deal with these routine types of objections_ Following that process, the County will focus on other individual, substantive claims objections. In addition to the County's adversary proceeding against Merrill Lynch, the County has filed six other actions against third parties. Merrill Lynch and several of these defendants filed motions seeking withdrawal of these actions from the Bankruptcy Court to the United States District Court. The District Court took these motions under submission on Monday of this week and we expect a ruling within the next two weeks. An October 4, 1996 hearing is scheduled in the Bankruptcy Court on the motions to dismiss filed by several of the third party defendants_ Pursuant to a court ordered joint discovery plan, the County will resume initial written discovery and depositions in the Merrill Lynch case after September 23, 1996. Defendants in other third party cases will be allowed limited participation in the depositions. After several months, the discovery will become more open to the non-Merrill Lynch defendants. �msxow SEP 11 '96 15:59 FR PILLSBURY MADISON 619 236 1995 TO 1S P.e3 Mr. Stan o£telie September 11, 1996 Page 2 we will continue to monitor the status of these various matters and will periodically provide you with status reports. If you have any questions, please call me. Sincer ours, C. . Shea cc: Official Investment Pool Participants committee and Counsel 209voaa rck TOTAL PAGE.93 xa SEP 18 '96 16:18 FR PILLS&W I=IS01 619 236 1995 10 18 P,82 7-o.+TE . F`[s'. DOO - 1AW PILLSBURY MADISON 6 SUTRO LLP LOF M,OFL[g Wy Moo MdIO nM1F NLW . OMN06 OWNT sPCwwwC 101 MEET aR011OWAY awa O�000 A.. SAN 019GO� CALIFORNIA 9E101-aale anN JO36 MOTON. OO MONO FO„O TOFw tLFCPNONL IGWI ilMlA00 IMg�M1LC (6101 no-logs WWII" OPnC6.0 aIP LOI O L NVMYCP (619) � 544-3177 September 18, 1996 VIA FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION TO: ORANGE COUNTY INVESTMENT POOL .._.___...__ OPTION A PARTICIPANTS' DISTRIBUTION LIST Re: In Re County of Orance case No. 94-22272JR Dear Option A Pool Participants: _ The legislation promoted by the Option B Pool Participants ISE 2169) , which arguably would have enhanced the litigation posture of Option B claims against the County and third parties, was not signed by the Governor. Herewith is a copy of the Governor's statement regarding SB 2169. S1ry�gD ely yours, Patrick C.S ea cc: Official Investment Pool Participants Committee and Counsel 1g99ssFF SP 18 '96 16:11 FR PILLSBURY MADISON 619 236 1995 TO 16 P.03 GOVERNORS OFFICE Supt.. 1 7 Roo To the Mmhas of the CaGfotma Senate; I am ramming Senate Bill No. 2169 without my sipatur . This bin would nuke it declarative of eassting law that funds deposited into a county treasury shall be held in trust when lawfully deposited by a public amity located in a jurisdiction —---.-. outside ofthe county. This bill would also make other technical c.hrages to adtting law. In 1995,after the detdaration of bankruptcy by Orange Cbunty,the Official Invrsstarent Pool Participants Committee, and most of the jurisdictions within the county agreed on a recovery plan. Last year, a series of bills were enacted to assist Orange County with is efforts to reach a settlement agreemern with its creditors. Uoweva, "Option B"jurisdimons, made up primarily of local agencies outside the county that deposited funds in the Orattge County investment pool, decided not to b==e signatories to the settlement agreement. By not signing the agreement, Option B jurisdetions have retained the right to take independent legal action against third parties. Tbasejurisdicrions are currently involved in Engation ova appropriate oompeoai,_m' for their losses It is inappropriate to consider this legislation urml the litigation is resolved. Cordially, PETS VMSON GOVERNOR PE Me WTL ON - STATE CAe OL . S,.CR ME . Cwuso A 95814 " TOTFL PAGE.03 +� sfO bT++� UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Criminal Investigation Division o 75 Hawthorne Street C-1 San Francisco, CA 941 0 5-3901 March 26, 1996 Mahin Talebi, Source Control Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Ave. Fountain Valley, CA 92728 Dear Ms . Talebi, As you may know, the United States has just concluded the criminal prosecution of Venus Laboratories of Huntington Beach, CA for violations of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act. In this case, Venus pleaded guilty of charges that they knowingly discharged pollutants into the publicly owned treatment works of the Orange County Sanitation Districts in violation of federal pretreatment standards. The investigation was the product of your staff and other members of the Orange County Environmental Crimes Task Force. What is significant about this case is not only is this the second criminal conviction against this company, but it is an example of the high degree of cooperation that has evolved in the area of environmental law enforcement in California. No single agency, has the staff needed to detect, investigate, and prosecute all instances of intentional pollution. But through task. force operations and joint investigations such as the Venus case, highly complex and resource intensive investigations can succeed. The success of the Venus case was due in large part to the work of your staff of investigators. Their efforts at inspection, sample collection, equipment calibration and deployment, supplied the critical physical evidence that supported the violations. I realize that this was a substantial committment on your part and I wanted to recognize the involvement of the following members of your staff: Deon Carrico Arnold Chavez James Davidson David Engstrom Darrell Ennis Tim Foley Tom Gaworski Mike Masterson Mike Reideler Merrill Seiler 2 I would particularly like to recognize the leadership of Project Supervisor Kelly Christensen. Mr. Christensen served as the focal point within your agency for the investigative efforts of EPA, California EPA, and the Orange County District Attorney. His direction of your staff brought together all their efforts to a successful prosecution. Please accept my appreciation and that of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Criminal Enforcement, Forensics and Training for a job well done. And please extend our gratitude to your staff. I have prepared Certificate of Appreciation for each staff member which Resident Agent-in-Charge Mike Konyu can deliver personally. Mr. Konyu will be in contact with your staff to arrange the appropriate presentation. Mr. Konyu can be contacted at 818-583-7528. Once again, thank you very much for your efforts and for your spirit of cooperation. Sincerely, ��J//� David W. Wilma Special Agent-in-Charge cc: RAC Mike Konyu Case file 0901.0029 September 18, 1996 MEMORANDUM TO: Nancy I Wheatley Director of Technical Services FROM: Kelly Christensen Source Control Supervisor THROUGH: MahinTalebi—,W7 Source Control Manager SUBJECT: U.S. EPA Award The U.S. EPA sent a letter of recognition on March 26. 1996, to the Districts' Source Control staff who contributed to the Venus Labs case in 1994. As you recall, the Districts was asked by the California Department of Health Services to provide monitoring and inspection in support of the existing case. Districts' inspectors produced evidence of illegal sewer disposal in the case against Venus Labs. The case continues to be litigated. Mr. David W. Wilma, a U.S. EPA Special Agent-in-Charge, has expressed an interest in presenting a certificate of appreciation to the inspectors involved. He is prepared to make the presentation at the Districts' Board of Directors meeting on September 25, 1996. Government budget restraints delayed their ability to make the presentation until now. This memo serves as a request to add this presentation to the agenda for the September 25th Board of Directors meeting. This could be part of the General Manager's Report. A letter with further information is attached. MT:Ivw JAWP35BBLLAUME PABRDNW Attachment (MAmh 2B,1BBB letter) CSDOC 0 P.O.Box 8127 0 Feenteln Valley,CA 82728-8127 0 (714)882-2411 Executive Summary (coned) Fact Book(cont'd) The Fad Books contain information on all 31 cities,dozens of special districts within Orange County,and more than 28 County agencies and departments. The County volume contains budget data,salary and position counts,specific state or federal mandates associated with program operations,and program sources of revenue for the past two fiscal years. Phase 11 Outreach The second part of the GPOCs work is highlighted in this Report(pages 27 to 64),showing the comments of a varied group of individuals associated with local government—what GPOC calls"stakeholders." The groups interviewed or polled include County employees, local government managers,"customers" of services,the general public,and vendors who contract with County government. Findings and Recommendations The net result of the workplan,the development of Findings and Recommendations relating to governance within and around the County of Orange,is cited in Part Nine of the Report We've highlighted selected Findings and Recommendations on the next page. Readers will find the detailed descriptions of the Findings and Recommendations on pages 73 to 102. In short,the GPOC recommendations ask the County to: •Focus more on long-term strategic planning. •Accurately and clearly account for program costs to ensure fair bidding. •Get out of specific"businesses." •Competitively bid almost all of its"marketplace" services,with encouragement offered to current employees to respond to the bids. •Give cities a greater voice in regional service delivery. •"Stop studying" and"start doing." Implementation The Report includes an action plan and timeline for implementing the suggested changes outlined in the Findings and Recommendations section(page 103). This part of the Report suggests who should take.the initial actions and when the initial actions aright bring the GPOCs work to fruition. How to Find Out More On page 107,the Report shows the reader how to contact some of the individuals involved in the GPOC effort—including addresses and phone numbers of the principal participants. Appendices The appendices to the GPOC Final Report include a detailed list(with summaries) of 19 separate reports and studies that GPOC members or staff reviewed in preparation for the Final Report Included in these summaries is a highlighted section that shows where the summarized document's conclusions"link" with those of the GPOC (page 113). Page 4 Findings and Recommendations for Orange County Special Districts L Move Towards Consolidation,Dissolution of Special Districts. The Fact Book an:vat focus groups and interviews convinced us that Orange County has more government entities'-tan is necessary to provide for adequate service delivery. Improved service and savings mare achieved by thoughtful consolidation and dissolution of some special districts. ♦We ximmsnd Orange County residents support the Loral Agency Formation Commission(LAFCO)in its mydtnd initiation of restructuring proposals if deemed in the public interest We suggest that in the fort LAFCO should evaluate all special districts from a "rmo-baud"perspectim evaluating eaM's need threagh a service delivery reoiero of districts and their spheres at least once every 10 years. 2 Consolidation Must Reflect local Circumstances. The Fact Book and our focus groin remind us that consolidation and dissolution requires careful review of serious issues that vary from district to district,including. •Water rights and sources •Debt variations •Service levels and rates •Historical asses •Assets and liabilities •Governance structures and political representation, The Ford-Sauvajot Study of IS special districts in central and south Orange County,a draft report of which was released in Spring 1996(summarized in Appendix A,page 118),appears to provide strong precedent for such review. ♦We recommend to LAFCO and to Orange County residents and legislators that any process for consolidation should provide for maximum local mmero and public input. We suggest that the State should limit its role in crosolfdation to calling for mstruchning and setting reasonable timelines for change. Should local officals fail toad,the State could reasonably foroe necessary consolidations. LAFCO and the public should consider full adoption of the recommendations of the Ford- Sauvajot Study. 3. Retail Districts Deserve LAFCO Scrutiny. The Fact Book and our interviews show us that special districts,especially"retail" districts(those that deliver a service directly to a resident or business)should be large enough to achieve optimum economies of scale while also supporting public involvement,and accountability. •We recommend that Orange County residents encourage retail districts that do not meet the abode-uated goal to be absorbed into a general public purpose organization. We further suggest that LAFCO direct that retail districts that do meet the goal conform their serous spheres to municipal boundaries to the extent feasible. 4. LAFCO Needs Help to Get it Done The Fact Book shows that LAFCO's resources do not appear to be sufficient to aggressively pursue consolidation and dissolution of special districts. ♦We recommend that the County,aided by contributions from cities,should provide greater General Fund allomfim to LAFCO for a three year period(staffed unth limited term positions)to ensure a high quality and timely review of consolidation proposals. Further,the County should use those positions doumsized in EMA/Plaming(see Recommendation ill for EMA)for LAFCO's additional needs(again an a limited term basis). S. All District Financial Data=Public Records. While compiling the Fact Book,we found that data collection process showed poor and user-unfriendly budget and financial reports by several special districts. One district,Carpenter Irrigation,refused to provide GPOC with any data or a district budget ♦We call upon all governments to comply toith frnannab reporting procedures outlined by the Gooeratmental Accounting Standards Board(GASH),including uniform accounting standards and uniform budget reporting. Request State Controller's assistance in more rapid completion of Reports of Financial Transactions. Remind local governments of their obligation to the taxpaying public rebating to open records and financial disclosure. Page 100 v • Findings and Recommendations for Orange County Special Districts (cont'd) 6. Greater Communication Required. Our interviews remind us that the changes in the regional service delivery environment will impact special districts in a significant way. ♦We recommend that the sanitation and water districts expand their participation(panccrpatzon which Aces not affect districts'operational decisions)in forums or structure that improve communication. Associations such as Me Independent Special Districts of Orange County(ISDOC)and the Water Advisory Committee Orange County(WACO)should be retained and nurtured as effective inforraationsharing vehicles. Page 101 AGENDA BOARDS OF DIRECTORS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 REGULAR MEETING SEPTEMBER 25, 1996 -7:30 P.M. ................ l iIn accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this I agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the Districts'Administrative Offices not less I than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. i i In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Boards for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) i as an emergency item or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came i to the attention of the Districts subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. (1) Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance (2) Roll call (3) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders) (4) Appointment of Chair pro tem, if necessary (5) Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Boards on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot have action taken by the Boards of Directors except as authorized by Section 54954.2(b). 09125/96 t (6) The Joint Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. (a) Report of Joint Chair; consideration of Resolutions or commendations, presentations and awards (b) Report of General Manager (c) Report of General Counsel (7) EACH DISTRICT If no corrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair: District 1 - August 28, 1996 regular District 2 - August 28, 1996 regular District 3 - August 28, 1996 regular District 5 - August 28, 1996 regular District 6 - August 28, 1996 regular District 7 - August 28, 1996 regular District 11 - August 28, 1996 regular District 13 - July 24, 1996 regular and August 28, 1996 regular District 14 - August 28, 1996 regular (8) Ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts, by roll call vote, as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District.) ALL DISTRICTS O8/07/96 O8/21/96 MISC. Joint Operating Fund - $1,040,405.06 $523,972.97 $ 2,618.50 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 2,301,318.40 704,668.80 0.00 Joint Working Capital Fund - 237,881.45 242,106.62 1,030.10 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 133,819.56 19,998.59 29,905.95 DISTRICT NO. 1 - (936.30) 0.00 692.78 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 499.31 2,102.92 2,167.40 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 110,034.68 20,153.82 1,993.35 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 3,407.61 273.28 265.83 DISTRICT NO. 6 - (446.33) 0.00 278.74 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 36,504.72 150,804.14 624.11 DISTRICT NO. 11 - (547.43) 160,948.44 516.69 DISTRICT NO. 13 - 2.55 0.00 73.43 DISTRICT NO. 14 - 47.13 0.00 186.28 DISTRICT NOS. 3 & 11 JOINT - 1.875.00 0.00 0.00 DISTRICT NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 4,177.42 8,859.30 0.00 DISTRICT NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 2,202.90 0.00 0.00 DISTRICT NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 7,294.62 14.76 0.00 $3.877.540.35 $1.833.903.64 $40,353.17 -2- 09/25/96 CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEMS (9) - (11) "_._.._.. ._.._.. ,._.._.._..._..._............_......................._..._.._..._..._.._.._....................._.._..._.._...._.._.._.._.._...._.._.._.� i All matters placed on the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or i i further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the i consent calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions I included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. I I i Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by number the item to be I i removed from the consent calendar. i j The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. i Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: DISTRICT NO. 5 (9) ORDER ANNEXATION NO. 9 -CRYSTAL COVE STATE PARK: The Director of Engineering requests approval of ordering annexation of a 20-acre portion of Crystal Cove State Park known as the"Historic District", located on Pacific Coast Highway north of the intersection of Sand Canyon Avenue. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Resolution ordering Annexation No. 9- Crystal Cove State Park to County Sanitation District No. 5. DISTRICT NO. 7 (10) ORDER ANNEXATION NO. 151 - GOODMAN ANNEXATION: The Director of Engineering requests approval of ordering annexation of 1.01 acres of unincorporated county territory south of the intersection of Lower Lake Drive and Lake Court. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Resolution ordering Annexation No. 151 -Goodman Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7. DISTRICT NO. 13 (Carried over from 0828/96 meeting due to lack of quorum) (11) Consideration of motion approving a new negotiated Consent Decree re U.S. Government v. Montrose Chemical Corp., at at., at no cost to the Districts. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (12) Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any -3- 09/25/96 NON-CONSENT CALENDAR ALL DISTRICTS (13) (a) Verbal Report by Chair of Steering Committee re September 25, 1996 meeting. (b) DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and file Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on August 28, 1996. (14) (a) Verbal Report by Chair of Planning, Design and Construction Committee re September 5, 1996 Meeting. (b) DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and file draft Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on September 5, 1996. (c) JOB NO. P2-58 WITH GIERLICH-MITCHELL, INC. FOR GRIT AUGER IMPROVEMENT AT PLANT NO. 2 (All Districts): The Engineering Department requests authority to issue a purchase order for rehabilitation of grit auger at Plant No. 2, for a total amount not to exceed $63,680.00. (PDC96-47) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Authorize issuance of a purchase order for Job No. P2-58, Grit Auger Improvement at Plant No. 2, to Gierlich-Mitchell, Inc. for design, manufacturing and installation services, for a total amount not to exceed $63,680.00. (d) CHANGE ORDER NO, 4 TO JOB NO. P1-36-2 WITH MARGATE CONSTRUCTION FOR SECONDARY TREATMENT IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 1 (All Districts): The Construction Manager and Director of Engineering request approval of Change Order No. 4 providing for seven items of additional work and four credit items. (PDC96-42) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve Change Order No. 4 to Job No. Pt-36-2 with Margate Construction for an addition of$24,733.00, increasing the total contract amount to $34,918,007.00. (a) PHASE II AND III OF THE STRATEGIC PLAN (All Districts): The Engineering Department requests approval of professional services agreements for Phase II and Phase III of the Strategic Plan for engineering services and preparation of a Programmatic Environmental Impact Report. (PDC96-45) RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1) Authorize staff to solicit proposals and negotiate a Professional Services Agreement for engineering services for Phase II, Treatment, Reuse and Disposal Facilities: and 2)Authorize staff to solicit proposals and negotiate a Professional Services Agreement re Phase III of the Strategic Plan for preparation of Programmatic Environmental Impact Report. (PDC96-45) -4- [ITEM (14) CONTINUED ON PAGE 5] 09/25/96 ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 4) (14) (f) ADDENDUM NO. 3 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH LEE& RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. FOR MODIFICATIONS TO ELECTRICAL AND CONTROL SYSTEMS, AND PROCESS EVALUATIONS AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-40.1,AND MODIFICATIONS TO ELECTRICAL AND CONTROL SYSTEMS, AND PROCESS EVALUATIONS AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-47-1 (AIL Districts): The Engineering Department requests the approval of an addendum to the agreement providing for additional engineering services and design changes. (PDC96-37) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve execution of Addendum No. 3 to Professional Services Agreement with Lee & Ro Consulting Engineers, Inc., in the amount of$76,801.00, for a total amount not to exceed $1,247,967.00. (g) JOB NO. P1-40-2 (REBID), FACILITY MODIFICATIONS AND SAFETY UPGRADES AT PLANT NO. 1, AND JOB NO. P2-47-2 (REBID), FACILITY MODIFICATIONS AND SAFETY UPGRADES AT PLANT NO. 2 (AIL Districts): The Director of Engineering requests that a construction contract be awarded re miscellaneous tasks for operational and safety related improvements to the treatment plants. The PDC Committee and Executive Committee reviewed the proposed actions by the Joint Boards at their meeting of September 25, 1996 in response to a protest letter from Margate Construction, Inc. protesting the bid of Pascal & Ludwig Engineers. (POC96-49) ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION: 1) Approve Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications correcting the date for receipt of bids; 2) Receive and file letter dated August 21, 1996 from Margate Construction, Inc. protesting the bid of Pascal and Ludwig Engineers; 3) Receive and file memoranda from General Counsel dated September 10, 1996 and September 17, 1996; -AND- 4) Reject protest of Margate Construction, Inc.; 5) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and 6)Award contract to Pascal & Ludwig Engineers for Job Nos. Pl-40-2 (Rebid) and P2-47-2 (Rebid), in a total amount of$1,878,437.00; -OR- 7)Accept protest of Margate Construction, Inc., declaring Pascal and Ludwig Engineers are ineligible to bid pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 5105; 8)Award contract to Margate Construction, Inc., second lowest bidder, for Job Nos. P1-40-2 (Rebid) and P2-47-2 (Rebid), in a total amount of$1,900,000.00. STAFF'S RECOMMENDATIONS: Items 1 through 6. -5- [ITEM (14) CONTINUED ON PAGE 6] 09/25/96 (14) DISTRICT 3 (Continued from page 5) (h) CHANGE ORDER NOS. 2 AND 3 TO CONTRACT NO. 3.36R, WESTMINSTER AVENUE FORCE MAIN (FIRST UNIT)AND NEW WESTSIDE PUMP STATION FORCE MAIN, WITH ALBERT W. DAVIES, INC., AND NOTICE OF COMPLETION (District 3): The Construction Manager and Director of Engineering request approval of Change Order No. 2, providing six items of additional work and granting a time extension of 25 calendar days for completion of said additional work; approval of Change Order No. 3, providing for an adjustment of Engineer's estimated quantities; and approve execution of the Final Closeout Agreement and filing of a Notice of Completion. (PDC96-44) RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: 1)Approve Change Order No. 2 to Contract No. 3-36R with Albert W. Davies, Inc. for an addition of$31,301.55 and 25 calendar days; 2)Approve Change Order No. 3, authorizing a net deduction of $42,216.00, decreasing the total contract amount to $3,823,756.55; and 3)Approve execution of Final Closeout Agreement and authorize filing of a Notice of Completion. ALL DISTRICTS (15) (a) Verbal Report by Chair of Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee re September 11, 1996 Meeting. (b) DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION, AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and file draft Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on September 11, 1996. (c) TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF JULY 1996 (FAHR96-49) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of July 1996. (d) ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE DISTRICTS' INVESTMENT POLICY (All Districts): The Director of Finance requests revision of the Districts' Investment Policy Statement. (FAHR96.51) RECOMMENDED ACTIONS 1) Receive and file Staff Report dated September 11, 1996; 2) Receive and file Investment Policy approved by Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee on September 11, 1996; and 3) Adopt a Resolution, amending Resolution No. 95-78 and repealing Resolution Nos. 95-14 and 95-15. -6- [ITEM (15) CONTINUED ON PAGE 71 09/25/96 (15) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 6) (a) ORDINANCE NO. 132, AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR AN EARLY RETIREMENT INCENTIVE PROGRAM BY GRANTING ADDITIONAL SERVICE CREDIT TO ELIGIBLE DISTRICTS' EMPLOYEES AS AUTHORIZED BY THE COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT LAW OF 1937, GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 31641.04 (All Districts): The Director of Human Resources, in conjunction with the FAHR Committee, requests that an Ordinance be adopted providing for two additional years of service credit to eligible Districts' employees who retire between January 1 and March 31, 1997, in accordance with provisions of Government Code Section 31641.04. (FAHR96-52) RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1) Read proposed Ordinance No. 132 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance; and 2) Introduce Ordinance No. 132 and pass to second reading and adoption at the October 23, 1996 Board Meeting. (f) PROPOSITION 218, RIGHT TO VOTE ON TAXES ACT(All Districts): The Chief Administrative Officer(CAO) requests the Boards to declare their opposition to Proposition 218. (FAHR96-54) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve FAHR Committee's recommendation taking no official position on Proposition 218, and direct staff to continue gathering and distributing information regarding potential impacts of the measure. (16) (a) Verbal Report by Chair of Executive Committee re September 18, 1996 Meeting. (b) DRAFT EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MINUTES RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and file draft Executive Committee Minutes for the meeting held on September 18, 1996. (c) LAFCO APPLICATION FOR THE CONSOLIDATION OF THE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY (All Districts): Staff requests approval by each District of the LAFCO application for the consideration of the nine County Sanitation Districts. RECOMMENDED ACTIONS (Each District): 1)Adopt a Resolution Initiating Proposal to Consolidate Districts; 2) Approve application package to be submitted to LAFCO, including the Terms and Conditions and Justification Proposal; and 3)Authorize submittal of application to LAFCO for the consolidation. -7- 09/25/96 (17) ALL DISTRICTS .._............_............._................................_.............................--- _.._..._.._........................... ._..._........ ._..._.._. I CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on i i this agenda as a regular meeting of the Boards,the Chair may convene the i Boards in closed session to consider matters of pending real estate negotiations,pending or potential litigation,or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.8,54956.9,54957 or 54957.6,as noted. Reports relating to(a) purchase and sale of real property; (b)matters of i pending or potential litigation;(c)employment actions or negotiations with i employee representatives;or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Boards during a I i permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as final actions are taken by the Boards on any of these subjects,the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. .._.._.._.._..._._.._.._............... _.._..._.._..._.._.._..._.._.._.._.._..._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._..._.._._.._..._.II (a) Convene in closed session, if necessary (b) (1) Confer with General Counsel re status of litigation, Patterson v. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court Case Nos. 738179, 738622 and 741371 (Government Code Section 54956.9[a]). (2) Confer with General Counsel re status of litigation, Louis Sangennano v. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 732680 (Government Code Section 54956.9[a]). (3) Confer with General Counsel re status of litigation, County Sanitation Districts of Orange County v. E.L. Yeager Construction Company, at al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 732578 (Government Code Section 54956.9[a]). (4) MOU Labor negotiations (c) Reconvene in regular session (d) Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session (18) Matters which a Director would like staff to report on at a subsequent meeting (19) Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff report (20) Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (21) Adjournments .8- 09/25/96 NOTICE TO DIRECTORS: To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Joint I i Boards, Directors shall submit items to the Board Secretary not later than the dose of business I 14 days preceding the Joint Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on the agenda all items submitted by Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and all formal i communications. I v Board Secretary: Penny Kos (714) 962.2411, ext. 2026 j Secretary: Patricia L. Jonk (714) 962.2411. ext. 2029 Secretary: Janet L. Gray (714) 962-2411, ext. 2027 :._._.._.._.._..._.._.._..._.._._.........................._.._._....._............... —.--'.—.-'------' -9- J:\WPDOC\BSWG961SEP96%-0a.W PD �L 0 9 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES JOINT BOARD MEETING AUGUST 28, 1996 RICTS Of p9g2 ye � no � G J a E ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7, 11, 13,and 14 of Orange County,California,was held on August 28, 1996,at 7:30 p.m.,in the Districts'Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1,2, 3,5,6,7,11,and 14 as follows: ACTIVE ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO.1: _x Pat McGuigan,Chair _ Ted R. Moreno Y James M.Ferryman,Chair pro tern _ Arthur Perry a Mark A Murphy Joanne Coontz Thomas R.Saharelli Jim Potts , x Roger Stanton Wiliam G.Steiner DISTRICT NO.2: __A__ Norman Z. Eckenrode,Chair Carol Downey 3_ Daniel T.Welch,Chair pro tern John M.Gullorson _* John Collins George Scott * Barry Denea Bob Bell * _ Burnie Dunlap Glenn Parker * James H. Flora Steve Anderson x Pat McGuigan Ted R.Moreno _jL_ Mark A Murphy Joanne Coontz X _ Chris Norby Don Bankhead __X_ Sheldon Singer George L Laket • Roger Stanton Wiliam G.Steiner • Bob Zemel Tom Day DISTRICT NO.3: _x Sal A. Sapien,Chair Harry A Dotson • Sheldon Singer,Chair pro tern George L.Laket • Waiter Bowman Gail Kerry _• George Brown Marilyn Bruce Hastings , •L_ John Collins George Scott —A-_ Burnie Dunlap Glenn Parker • James H.Flora Steve Anderson • Don R.Griffin Patsy Marshall • Victor Leipzig Ralph Bauer • Wally Linn Eve G.Miner _• Pat McGuigan _ Ted R.Moreno __IL._ Chris Norby Don Bankhead • Margie L.Rice James V. Evans _• Roger Stanton Wiliam G.Steiner , •L_ Charles Sylvia Robert Wahlatrom _• Bob Zenner Tom Day DISTRICT NO. 5: _x Jan Debay,Chair John C.Cox,Jr. • William G.Steiner,Chair pro tern _ Roger Stanton John C.Cox,Jr. x Jan Debay DISTRICT NO.6: x James M.Ferryman,Chair Arthur Perry _x Jan Debay,Chair pro tern _ John C.Cox,Jr. _y_ William G. Steiner _ Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO.7: x Barry Hammond.Chair Mike Ward x Thomas R.Saltarelli,Chair pro tem _ Jim Potts x Jan Debay John C.Cox,Jr. _x James M.Ferryman _ Arthur Perry �L_ Pat McGuigan _ Ted R.Moreno a Mark A Murphy _ Joanne Coon x Wiliam G. Steiner _ Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 11: x_ Victor Leipzig,Chair Ralph Bauer X Shirley Dettloff,Chair pro tern _ Ralph Bauer x Roger Stanton Wiliam G.Steiner DISTRICT NO. 13: a John M.Guibson,Chair Daniel T.Welch 3 Bob Zemel,Chair pro tem Tom Day * Burnie Dunlap Glenn Parker _rL_ Mark A.Murphy Joanne Coon x William G.Steiner Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 14: x Thomas R.Saharelli,Chair Jim Potts * Mark A-Murphy,Chair pro tem Joanne Coon * Barry Hammond Mike Ward _ * Wiliam G.Steiner Roger Stanton _L Peer A Swan Darryl Miller -2- 6 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 8/26/96 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Blake P. Anderson, Assistant General Manager-Operations, Judith A. Wilson, Assistant General Manager-Administration, Penny Kyle, Board Secretary, Chris Dahl, Janet Gray, Irwin Haydock, Patricia Jonk, John Linder, Mike Moore, Bob Ooten, Mike Peterman, Michelle Tuchman, Nancy Wheatley, Mike White OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Bill Knopf, Mary Lee, Craig Scott, Phil Stone, Nancy Whitehead DISTRICT 13 Adjournment of meeting due to lack of quorum This 28th day of August, 1996, at 7:30 p.m., being the time and place for the Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, and there not being a quorum present in District No. 13, the meeting of said District was thereupon adjourned by the Secretary. DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7,11 & 14 Adoption of resolution of appreciation for immediate oast Joint Chair John C. Cox, Jr. Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution 96-78 commending Director John Cox for his contributions to the Districts during his tenure as Joint Chair. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. Joint Chair John Collins stated that the resolution would be formally presented to Director Cox during a future board meeting. DISTRICT 2 Election of Chair Due to the recent election of John Collins as Joint Chair, nominations were opened for the Chair of District No. 2. Director Norman Eckenrode was nominated and no further nominations were made. -3- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 8/28/96 DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7,11, & 14 Reoort of the Joint Chair At the invitation of Joint Chair John Collins, Jan Debay spoke about a recent CASA conference held in Monterey. Joint Chair John Collins advised that the next Quarterly Strategic Planning Workshop was scheduled for Saturday, September 21, from 9:00 a.m. until noon in the Board Room at Plant No. 1. Progress reports on the investigation of the Districts' ocean ouffalls will be presented by staff. A discussion of Project 2, management of peak flows, and the impact on the existing outfall system will be conducted. The Second Annual Family Day for Districts' employees will be held on October 12 from 10:00 a.m. until 2:30 p.m., at Plant No. 2. Directors were encouraged to attend the tours and enjoy lunch at Family Day. The Joint Chair offered congratulations to Director Pat McGuigan on her receipt of a national award from the YWCA, recognizing her as part of the Salute to Women in Leadership: A Power for Change campaign. He noted Director McGuigan's long-term involvement in YWCA activities, as well as her participation on its Board of Directors. The following tentatively scheduled upcoming meetings were then announced as follows: Planning, Design, and Construction Committee -Thursday, September 5, at 5:30 p.m. Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee - Wednesday, September 11, at 5:30 p.m. Executive Committee -Wednesday, September 18, at 5:30 p.m. Steering Committee -Wednesday, September 25, at 5:30 p.m. The Joint Chair pointed out that the Operations, Maintenance, and Technical Services Committee meeting, originally scheduled for Wednesday, September 4, had been canceled. -4- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 8/28196 DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14 Report of General Manager Blake Anderson, acting General Manager, reported that EPA would be visiting in early September to review our industrial source control program. The EPA will use our program as a benchmark of effectiveness and cost efficiency. Mr. Anderson recognized Judy Wilson, who then introduced Chris Dahl, the new Information Technology Manager for the Districts. DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14 Report of General Counsel Mr. Woodruff emphasized that representation on the Board of Directors of CASA needed to continue. He advised that there was one item on the supplemental agenda concerning a stop notice received since publication of the original agenda. DISTRICT 1 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held July 24, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held July 24, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 3 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held July 24, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -5- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 8/28196 DISTRICT 5 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held July 24, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 6 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held July 24, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 7 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held July 24, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 11 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held July 24, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 14 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held July 24, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -6- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 8/28/96 DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14 Ratification of Payment of Joint and Individual District Claims Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That payment of Joint and Individual District claims set forth on exhibits "A" , .'B", and "C", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. ALL DISTRICTS 07/10/96 07/24/96 misc. Joint Operating Fund - $606,937.65 $747,562.51 $ 51,378.48 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 1,466,247.71 217.567.50 10,364.12 Joint Working Capital Fund - 105,895.63 173,119.71 2,325.00 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 80,530.52 53,010.30 1,244,479.20 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 0.00 3,321.53 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 12,568.64 24,753.37 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 57,891.97 67,656.02 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 3,494.13 4,939.46 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 0.00 2,154.80 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 12,370.89 48,434.56 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 720.96 21,649.35 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 13 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 14 - 210.00 297.50 0.00 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 &6 JOINT - 1,540.35 47,182.67 0.00 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 3,491.48 0.00 0.00 DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 2,816.48 0.00 0.00 $2.354.716.31 $1.411.649.28 $1.308.546.60 DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14 Approving a new negotiated Consent Decree re U.S. Government v. Montrose Chemical Corp.. at al. Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the new negotiated Consent Decree re U.S. Government v. Montrose Chemical Corp., at al., be, and is hereby, approved at no cost to the Districts. -7- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 8128/96 DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14 Amending Resolution No. 96-76, Fixing and Establishing Rules of Procedure for the Conduct of Business of the Districts Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 96-76, amending Resolution No. 95-30, Fixing and Establishing Rules of Procedure for the Conduct of Business of the Districts, providing for the Steering Committee membership to include the immediate Past Joint Chair. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14 Verbal report from Chair of Steering Committee re August 28, 1996 meeting Joint Chair John Collins, Chair of the Steering Committee, gave a brief verbal report on the August 28, 1996 meeting. DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14 Receive and file draft minutes of the Steering Committee Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the draft minutes of the Steering Committee meeting held on July 24, 1996, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14 Verbal report from Chair of Planning. Design. and Construction Committee re August 1. 1996 meeting Director Sheldon Singer, Chair of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee, gave a brief verbal report on the items being recommended for approval. -8- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 8/28196 DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7,11 & 14 Receive and file draft minutes of the Planning. Design, and Construction Committee Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the draft minutes of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee meeting held on August 1, 1996, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5,6,7.11 & 14 (PDC96-29) Actions re Office Trailer Relocations at Plants Nos. 1 and 2. Soecification No. M-044 (Rebid) Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Specification No. M-044 (Rebid) Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing an addition of$11,017.00 to the contract with Colich Bros., Inc. dba Colich & Sons for four items of additional or deleted work and time extensions, granting a total time extension of 100 calendar days for completion of said work, be, and is hereby, approved. Accepting Specification No. M-044 (Rebid) as complete Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Office Trailer Relocations at Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Specification No. M-044 (Rebid), be, and is hereby, accepted as complete, and, FURTHER MOVED: That execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement for a final total contract amount of $309,717.00, be, and is hereby, authorized. -9- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 8/28/96 DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14 (PDC96-30) Approving Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications for Job No. P1-36-2 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications for Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36-2, authorizing a net deduction of$100,226.00 from the contract with Margate Construction for 15 items of additional or deleted work, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14 (PDC96-32) Accepting Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-2, as complete Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-2, be, and is hereby, accepted as complete; and, FURTHER MOVED: That execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement for a final total contract amount of$14,350,183.00, be, and is hereby, authorized. DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14 (PDC96-36) Aoorovino plans and specifications re Job No. J-34-1 and Job No. P2-35-5 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the plans and specifications for Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades, Job No. J-34-1, and Phase 2 Site and Security Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-35-5, be, and are hereby, approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to establish the date for receipt of bids. -10- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 8/28/96 DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14 (PDC96-35) Actions re Restoration of Old Laboratory for Human Resources Department, Job No. J-11-2 Approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for said project making miscellaneous clarifications be, and is hereby, approved. Awarding contract for Restoration of Old Laboratory for Human Resources Department, Job No. J-11-2 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and award contract for Restoration of Old Laboratory for Human Resources Department, Job No. J-11-2, to Varkel Construction, Inc., in the total amount of$288,800.00. DISTRICTS 1.2,3.5.6.7.11 & 14 (PDC96-39) Ratifying emergency action of the Planning. Design. and Construction Committee re Job No. J-25-3 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the emergency action of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee approving and authorizing the General Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement to provide specialized consulting services re Power Source Reliability Evaluation, Job No. J-25-3, with General Electric Electrical Distribution & Control, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, indirect costs, direct expenses, and fixed profit in an amount not to exceed $104,000.00, plus Errors & Omissions insurance costs, be, and is hereby, ratified. _11_ County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 8/28/96 DISTRICTS 1.2,3,5.6.7.11 & 14 Verbal report from Chair of Finance. Administration. and Human Resources Committee re August 7. 1996 meeting Director George Brown, Chair of the Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee, gave a brief verbal report on the items being recommended for approval. DISTRICTS 123.5.67,11 & 14 Receive and file draft minutes of the Finance Administration. and Human Resources Committee Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the draft minutes of the Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee meeting held on August 7, 1996, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICTS 1,2.3.5,6.7,11 & 14 (FAHR96-46) Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of June 1996 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Treasurer's Report for the month of June 1996, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14 (FAHR96-47) Action re Basic Integrated Reuse Project (BIRP) Authorizing staff to negotiate an amendment to the Joint Ownership. Operation and Construction Agreement Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to negotiate an amendment to the Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement dated December 11, 1985 and as amended February 13, 1986, to provide that the 1996-97 flow excludes up to 3.2 mgd if the three-party BIRP is approved; maintain the June 30, 1997 equity sale from District No. 14 to -12- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 8/28/96 the other Districts calculated on the basis of excluding up to 3.2 mgd for approximately four months as an inter-District payable/receivable of approximately $4.8 million; and, transfer the funds in 1999-2000 in order to eliminate the negative cash flow impacts on the other Districts from the accelerated flow reduction. Authorizing staff to negotiate an amendment to the First Amended and Restated Agreement for Utilization of Reclaimed Wastewater Agreement Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to negotiate an amendment to the First Amended and Restated Agreement for Utilization of Reclaimed Wastewater Agreement, dated June 9, 1993, with OCWD re Green Acres Project (GAP) water, to include a long-term commitment to purchase and to supply reclaimed water at a mutually agreeable price which reflects potential OCWD savings and does not exceed the costs of operations and maintenance. DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14 (FAHR96-48) Amending Resolution No. 95-105, Personnel and Salary Resolution Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 96-77, amending Personnel and Salary Resolution No. 95-105, adopting a Firearms and Weapons Policy. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14 Actions re Main Sewage Pump (MSP) No. 3 Drive at Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-33-2 Approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for said project, making miscellaneous clarifications, be and is hereby, approved. -13- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 8/28/96 Awarding contract to Pascal & Ludwig Engineers Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and award contract for Main Sewage Pump (MSP) No. 3 Drive at Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-33-2, to Pascal & Ludwig Engineers in the total amount of$516,000.00. DISTRICTS 1.2,3.5.6.7.11 & 14 General Counsel's comments Prior to Closed Session General Counsel reported to the Directors the need for a closed session as authorized by Government Code Sections 54956.9 and 54957.6 to discuss and consider the items that are specified as Items 17(b)(1) through 17(b)(7) on the published agenda. General Counsel also indicated a need to add one item needing immediate attention, and stated that the need for said attention came subsequent to the posting of the agenda. He reported that additional items could be added pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2(b) upon a two-thirds vote of the Directors. No other items would be discussed or acted upon. DISTRICTS 3 & 11 Actions re Supplemental Agenda Item relative to Summons and Complaint for Breach of Contract and Enforcement of Stop Notice, Paramount Fabricators. Inc. v Colich & Sons, at al.. Orange County Superior Court Case No. 767890, in connection with Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewaae System Improvements. Contract No. 11-17-1 Authorizing consideration of Supplemental Agenda Item relative to Summons and Complaint for Breach of Contract and Enforcement of Stoo Notice, Paramount Fabricators. Inc. v. Colich & Sons, at al. Orange County Superior Court Case No. 767890 Moved, seconded, and duly carried by unanimous vote: That the Boards of Directors of Districts No. 3 and 11 do hereby authorize consideration of supplemental agenda item relative to Summons and Complaint for Breach of Contract and Enforcement of -14- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 8128196 Stop Notice, Paramount Fabricators, Inc. v. Colich & Sons, at al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 767890, in connection with Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements, Contract No. 11-17-I, which was not posted 72 hours prior to the Board meeting date because the request to take said action arose subsequent to the agenda being posted. Receive and file Summons and Complaint for Breach of Contract and Enforcement of Stop Notice, Paramount Fabricators. Inc. v. Colich & Sons. at al. Orange County Superior Court Case No. 767890 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Summons and Complaint for Breach of Contract and Enforcement of Stop Notice, Paramount Fabricators, Inc. v. Colich & Sons, at al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 767890, in connection with Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements, Contract No. 11-17-I, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Districts' General Counsel be, and is hereby, authorized to appear and defend the interests of the Districts. DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14 Convene in Closed Session pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9(a) and 54957.6 The Boards convened in closed session at 8:23 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9(a) and 54957.6. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Boards of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. No actions were taken re Agenda Item Nos. 24(b)(1) and 24(b)(2). DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14 Reconvene in regular session At 9:29 p.m., the Boards reconvened in regular session. -15- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 8/28/96 DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14 Denying claim of Larry and Donna Anderson, Claim No. 5-CSD-96-L-4.5. re Bay Bridge Pump Station sewage spill Upon return from closed session, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the claim of Larry and Donna Anderson, Claim No. 5-CSD-96-L-4.5, for property damage re Bay Bridge Pump Station sewage spill, be, and is hereby, denied. DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14 Denying claim of Mr. and Mrs. William T. White, III, Claim No. 5-CSD-96-L-4.13. re Bay Bridge Pump Station sewage spill Upon return from closed session, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the claim of Mr. and Mrs. William T. White, III, Claim No. 5-CSD-96-L4.13, for property damage re Bay Bridge Pump Station sewage spill, be, and is hereby, denied. DISTRICT 1 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:29 p.m. DISTRICT 2 Adopting Rules of Procedure for Administrative Proceedings before the Executive Committee or Board(s) of Directors Upon return from closed session, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Rules of Procedure for Administrative Proceedings before the Executive Committee or Board(s) of Directors, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, be, and are hereby, adopted. -16- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 8/28196 DISTRICT 2 Adiournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:29 p.m. DISTRICT 3 Aporovina olans and specifications for Contract No. 3-35R-1 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the plans and specifications for Magnolia Relief Trunk Sewer, Westminster Avenue to Trask Avenue, Contract No. 3-35R-1, be, and are hereby, approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to establish the date for receipt of bids. DISTRICT 3 Approving increase in authorized fees to special counsel Griffin-Carrick re District No. 3 vs. United Technologies Corp., at al. Upon return from closed session, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue Change Order No. 5 in an amount of$20,000.00 to Purchase Order No. 54292 issued to special counsel Griffin-Carrick, increasing the authorized amount from an amount not to exceed $50,000.00 to an amount not to exceed $70,000.00 for special counsel legal fees, re litigation for recovery of District damages-County Sanitation District No. 3 vs. United Technologies Corporation, at al. DISTRICT 3 Adiournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:29 p.m. -17- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 8/28/96 DISTRICT 5 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:29 p.m. DISTRICT 6 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:29 p.m. DISTRICT 7 (PDC96-33) Actions re Abandonment of Bent Tree Cowan Heights, Derby Nos. 1 and 2. Lake Court and Shady Canyon Pump Stations, Contract No. 7-14-2 Approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing an addition of$5,172.00 to the contract with Clarke Contracting Corporation for one item of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. Approving Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing an adjustment of engineers quantities for a total deduction of $20,475.00 from the contract with Clarke Contracting Corporation, be, and is hereby, approved. -18- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 8/28/96 Accepting Contract No. 7-14-2 as complete Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Abandonment of Bent Tree, Cowan Heights, Derby Nos. 1 and 2, Lake Court and Shady Canyon Pump Stations, Contract No. 7-14-2, be, and is hereby, accepted as complete; and, FURTHER MOVED: That execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement for a final total contract amount of $629,578.27, be, and is hereby, authorized. DISTRICT 7 (PDC96-34) Actions re Parallel and Replacement of Portions of Lemon Heights Subtrunk Sewer, La Colina Drive to Newport Boulevard, Contract No. 7-22, and Manhole Access Modifications to RA-14 Sewer at Newport Boulevard and Cowan Heights Drive, Contract No. 7-24 Approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a total addition of $32,521.20 to the contract with Calfon Construction, Inc., be, and is hereby, approved. Accepting Contract No. 7-22 and Contract No. 7-24 as complete Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Parallel and Replacement of Portions of Lemon Heights Subtrunk Sewer, La Colina Drive to Newport Boulevard, Contract No. 7-22, and Manhole Access Modifications to RA-14 Sewer at Newport Boulevard and Cowan Heights Drive, Contract No. 7-24, be, and is hereby, accepted as complete; and, -19- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 8128/96 FURTHER MOVED: That execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement for a final total contract amount of $1,637,263.39, be, and is hereby, authorized. DISTRICT 7 Adiournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:29 p.m. DISTRICT 11 Adiournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:29 p.m. DISTRICT 14 Adiournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:29 p.m. Secretary of a ofird f Directors of County S nit ion i ricts Nos. 1, 2, 3, , , T1 , 13 & 14 -20- FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 07MBM PAGE 1 " REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07/1096 POSTING DATE 07/1096 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 152945 ABB LOGISTICS CENTER $5,594.67 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 152M AT&T-MEGACOM SERVICE $3,240.89 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 152947 AT&T-PRO WATTS $939.44 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 152948 A T&T-CELLULAR CR&R $11.05 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 152949 ADAMSON INDUSTRIES $1,524.36 LAB SUPPLIES 152950 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $7.01 LAB SUPPLIES 152951 ALCO PRODUCTS INC $91.90 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 152952 ALLEN PRESS $93.25 PUBLICATIONS 152953 AMERICATA $8,237.71 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 152954 AMERICAN AIRLINES $2,797.04 TRAVEL SERVICES 162955 AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY $280.19 LAB SUPPLIES 152956 BLAKE P.ANDERSON $78.69 REIMBURSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE 152957 ANGEL SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS INC. $633.83 LAB SUPPLIES 152958 ANIXTER-DISTRIBUTION $275.87 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 152959 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $2,173.82 COMPUTER SOFTWARE M 152980 -ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE,INC. $315.92 TOXIC WASTE REMOVAL X 152981 AUTODESK,INC. $350.71 COMPUTER PARTS 152952 AWARDS&TROPHIES $40.92 PLAQUES 152963 BC WIRE ROPE&RIGGING $232.31 AUTO PARTS -{ 152964 E S BABCOCK&SONS INC $1,350.00 LAB ANALYSIS n 152965 BANANA BLUEPRINT $154.73 PRINTING M.O.11-07-94 1529M BANKOFAMERICA $156.83 BANKING SERVICES 1--' 152987 BARCLAYS LAW PUBLISHERS $149.00 PUBLICATION 152968 BATTELLE $1,800.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES NO 3-27-98 152959 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $702.53 BATTERIES 152970 BAYSHORE PSYCHOLOGY CENTER $170.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 162971 BIOMERIEUX VITEK,INC. $574.60 LAB SUPPLIES 152972 BRENNER-FIEDLER&ASSOC.,INC. $123.69 GENERATORS 152973 BRINKMANN INSTRUMENTS INC. $134.21 LAB SUPPLIES 152974 CDI I CHIP&SHORE CONTRACTING $339.41 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 152975 C.P.I. $1,395.36 LAB SUPPLIES 152976 CAD ONE,INC. $99.44 OFFICE SUPPLIES 152977 CALTROL,INC. $1,603.32 HARDWARE 152978 CALIFORNIA AUTO COLLISION,INC. $1,468.39 TRUCK BODY REPAIR 152979 CALIF CENTRIFUGAL PUMP $1.033.73 PUMP PARTS 152980 CAMAU CORP. $2.575.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 152981 CAMP DRESSER&MC KEY INC $159,398.00 CONSULTANT NO 3-27-96 152982 CARLETON ENGINEERS $130.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES-AIR QUALITY 152983 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $3,240.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES 152984 CASADA CONSTRUCTION CO $36,160.00 CONSTRUCTION 152985 CASA $160.D0 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 152986 CENTURY SAFETY INST.&SUPPLY $5,656.88 SAFETY SUPPLIES 152987 CERTIFIED APPLIANCE CO $341.76 REPAIR OVEN 162988 CHROME CRANKSHAFT,INC. $240.00 PUMP PARTS 152989 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $302.89 SERVICE AGREEMENT 152990 COMPUTERS AMERICA $221.82 PRINTER SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 07/08/96 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07/10/98 POSTING DATE 07/10/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 152991 CONNELL GM PARTS/DIV. $58.10 TRUCK PARTS 152992 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $7.305.08 ELECTRIC PARTS 152993 CONSUMER PIPE $489.65 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 152994 CONTAINER CORPORATION 7.23 $257.76 PERMIT OVERPAYMENT REFUND 152995 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $2,402.89 ENGINE PARTS 152996 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $67.28 TRUCK PARTS 152997. COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $2,818.50 ELECTRIC PARTS 152998 CPU-COMPUTER REPAIR $179.95 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 152999 CRITTER CATCHERS $45,00 RELOCATION 153000 DATA SYSTEMS SERVICE $4,123.73 SOFTWARE 153001 DAVE'S BICYCLES,INC. $40,89 BIKE REPAIRS 153002 DELL MARKETING L.P. $8,036.00 COMPUTERS 153003 DICKSONS $999.92 PUMP 153004 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $940.00 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 153005 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $6,975.18 PAINT SUPPLIES TT1 153006 'EMA INC $2,750.W PROFESSIONAL SERVICES X 153007 EAGLE DISTRIBUTION $655.79 AUTO SUPPLIES ._. 153006 ELECTRA-BOND,INC. $2.532.13 REBUILD TURNTABLE 153009 ENCHANTER,INC. $3,500.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5-24-95 --j 153010 ENVIREX INC. $328.64 MECHANICAL PARTS D 153011 FLUID TECH.SALES $214.69 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 153012 FMC CORPORATION $124,650.55 HYDROGEN PEROXIDE MO 9-14-94 N 153013 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $165.85 AIR FREIGHT 153014 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $1.181.09 FILTERS 153DIS FIRST CHOICE $379.98 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT 153016 FISHER ROSEMOUNT $1,086.49 ELECTRIC INSTRUMENT 153017 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $241.79 LAB SUPPLIES 153018 FLICKINGER CO $360.98 GAUGE 153019 TIM FOLEY $113.38 EXPENSE REIMS. 153020 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $21.99 PHOTO SUPPLIES 153021 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT 5896.71 PAINT SUPPLIES 153022 FRY'S ELECTRONICS $1,318.73 ELECTRONIC&COMPUTER SUPPLIES 153023 GST,INC. $11,825.83 OFFICE SUPPLIES 153024 GE IND&POWER SYSTEMS $2.432.68 ELECTRIC PARTS 153025 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1,108.80 TELEPHONE SERVICES 153026 GRAPHIC CONTROLS $245.19 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 153027 GRASSY S.T.I. $778.25 ENGINE PARTS 153028 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC WHOLESALE $228.23 TELEPHONE PARTS 153029 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $642.68 PRINTING 153030 DGA CONSULTANTS $11.058.50 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-6-94 153031 GRIFFIN CARRICK $19.50 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MO 9.27-95 153032 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $276.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 153033 MACH COMPANY $674.16 LAB SUPPLIES 153034 MATCH&KIRK,INC. $2,117.55 TRUCK PARTS 153035 PL HAWN CO,INC. $2,047.31 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 153036 HILTI,INC. $1,321.02 TOOLS FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 07/08/96 PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07/10/96 POSTING DATE 07110/98 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 153037 HOME DEPOT $153.35 SMALL HARDWARE 153038 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $1.490.41 PAINT SUPPUES 153039 HYDROPURE POOL SERVICE $1.865.00 REPAIR POND 153040 IPCO SAFETY $4,328A2 SAFETY SUPPLIES 163041 ISCO,INC. $8.620.01 INSTRUMENT 163042 IMAGING PLUS $598.95 OFFICE SUPPLIES 153043 INDUSTRIAL SAFETY SHOE CO. $2.598.37 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES _ 153044 IRVINE PIPE SUPPLY $48.08 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 153045 J2 PRINTING SERVICES $890.02 PRINTING 153046 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $840.61 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 153047 JAYS CATERING $203.15 DIRECTORS MEETING EXPENSE 153048 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $76.91 ELECTRIC PARTS 1530a9 KEENAN SUPPLY $1.782.38 PLUMBING SUPPLIES ISM50 KELAR CORPORATION $2,703.75 SOFTWARE 153051 KEMIRON PACIFIC,INC. $30,504A9 FERRIC CHLORIDE M09-27-95 153052 KEWAUNEE SCIENTIFIC CORP. $2,829.06 WORKBENCH X 153053 KING BEARING,INC, $1.354.96 MACHINE SUPPLIES = 153054 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $1,178.19 TOOLS 153055 KOOL TRONIC INC OF CALIF $328.81 MOTOR �153056 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $1.129.67 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICE ~ 153057 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY CO. $1,145.25 SAFETY SUPPLIES � 153058 WILLIAM J.LLOYD $598.50 EXPENSE REIMB. W 153059 SOCO-LYNCH CORP. $1,105.43 JANITORIAL SERVICES 153080 MDT $578.51 LAB SUPPLIES 153061 MTA US BC $270.00 MEMBERSHIP 153062 MAG SYSTEMS $185.52 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 153063 MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY CORP. $1,022.65 TOOLS IS3064 MANDIC MOTORS $45.00 TOWING SERVICES 153055 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $937.231.37 CONSTRUCTION Pl-36-2 153066 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $10,961.00 CONSTRUCTION P2-42-2 153067 MC FADDEN DALE HARDWARE CO $110.56 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 153D68 DONALD F.MCINTYRE $243.80 EXPENSE REIMB. 153069 MESA MUFFLER $101.46 TRUCK PARTS 153070 MISSION ABRASIVE SUPPLIES $996.69 WELDING SUPPLIES ISW71 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3,840.58 UNIFORM RENTALS 153072 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO. $338.00 INSTRUMENT 153073 MOORE PRODUCTS CO $423.10 ELECTRIC PARTS 153074 MOTOROLA,INC. $409.45 INSTRUMENT PARTS 153075 STADARD REF.MATL PROGRAM $2,400.00 SOFTWARE 153076 NATIONAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION 5212.00 PUBLICATIONS 153077 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $1,809.42 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 153078 HOANG NGUYEN $47.66 REIMB.OVERDEDUCTION 153079 NICHOLAS CHEVROLET $96.98 AUTO REPAIR 153080 NICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY $42.28 LUBRICANTS/DIESEL FUEL 153081 OCEAN IMAGING $15.000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 153082 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $8,062.41 OFFICE SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 07108M PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07/10/96 POSTING DATE 07/10/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 153083 OMNI WESTERN INC 5386.45 TOOLS 153054 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $26.56 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 153085 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. $361.52 FITTINGS 163086 COUNTY OF ORANGE $5,150.13 2-WAY RADIO SERVICES 3RD OTR 153087 PSI $195.43 HARDWARE 163080 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $1,766.20 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 153089 PACIFIC PARTS $371.45 INSTRUMENT PARTS -153090 PACIFIC BELL $17.14 TELEPHONE SERVICES 153091 PAGENET $1,112.85 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 153092 PARAGON CABLE $36.78 CABLE SERVICES 153093 PARKER HANNIFIN CORP. $220.30 REGULATOR PARTS 153094 PEERLESS WIPING MATERIALS $721.93 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 153095 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $2.172.32 REIMB.PETTY CASH 153098 PHOTRON USA $194.00 LAB SUPPLIES 153097 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $150,124.03 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3-29-95 m 153098 POLYPURE,INC. $15,865.84 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O311-92 = 153099 PRENTICE HALL $107.47 PUBLICATION .-i 153100 QUALITY BUILDING SUPPLY $167.44 BUILDING MATERIALS 153101 RJN GROUP,INC. $3,400.00 SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT -� 153102 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $250.54 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS 153103 R&R INSTRUMENTS 56,045.40 ELECTRIC PARTS nj 153104 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $2.OD2.72 TRASH REMOVAL r 153105 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO. $156.61 LAB SUPPLIES 153106 DENNIS RASIMAS 8 $5,000.00 CLAIM SETTLEMENT NO.J-CSD-94-L-29 153107 REDWINGSHOES $118.09 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 153108 DOLT DELIVERY $24.00 FREIGHT 153109 THE REGISTER $3,264.80 NOTICES&ADS 153110 ROSEMOUNT,INC. $684.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS 153111 ROSEMOUNT ANALYTICAL.INC. $412.02 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 153112 SAWPA $35,000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 153113 SAWS CLUB 548.49 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 153114 SANTA FE BAG CO. $238.05 FREIGHT 153115 RICHARD SANTANGELO $282.03 EXPENSE REIMB. 153116 R.CRAIG SCOTT&ASSOC. $59.801.22 LEGAL SERVICES-PERSONNEL ISSUES 153117 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES.INC. $1,695.16 SPECIALTY GASES 153118 SEA COAST DESIGNS $900.79 LAB SUPPLIES 153119 SENSOREX INC $272.60 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 153120 SERPENTUL CONVEYOR CORP $3.264.70 PLASTIC ROLLERS 153121 STUARTSEVERN $765.37 EXPENSE REIMB, 153122 SEWER EQUIP CO OF AMERICA $452.95 ROOT CUTTER 153123 SHASTA ELECTRIC $84.074.00 CONSTRUCTION J-31-2 153124 SHURELUCK SALES $6,225.53 TOOLSAHARDWARE 153125 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO. $81.46 LAB SUPPLIES 153126 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $70.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 153127 SMITH-EMERY CO. $648.DD SOIL TESTING M.O.7-13-94 153128 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP. $855.16 TOOLS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 07/08/96 PAGES REPORT NUMBERAP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07/10/96 POSTING DATE 07110/9S WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 153129 SO COAST AIR QUALITY $2,475.20 PERMIT FEES 153130 SO COAST AIR QUALITY $195.00 PERMIT FEES 153131 SO CALIF EDISON CO $41.888.28 POWER 153132 SO CALIF EDISON CO $30,592.39 POWER 153133 SOUTHWEST SCIENTIFIC $1.293.00 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 163134 SUMMIT STEEL $088.04 METAL 153135 SUNSETFORD $149.36 TRUCK PARTS -153136 SVER DRUP CORPORATION $202.905.00 CONSTRUCTION P2-35-3,P2d6,PI-38-5,P2-55 153137 TCH ASSOCIATES $1,636.91 LAB SUPPLIES 153138 TAKE CHARGE CONSULTANTS $27,377.15 MANAGEMENT TRAINING 153139 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $74.84 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 153140 TELEDYNE ANALYTICAL $144.58 INSTRUMENT PARTS 153141 TERRY'S CAMERA $879.18 NIKON CAMERA 153142 THOMASOWSTANLEY,INC. $346.05 MECHANICAL PARTS 153143 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $1.107.47 MECHANICAL PARTS 153144 TOSHIBA INTERNATIONAL $1,104.51 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES m 153145 TRANE $68.60 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES X x 153146 TRANSMATION,INC. E3,321.04 INSTRUMENT PARTS t- 153147 TRUCK 8 AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $562.98 TRUCK PARTS 153148 JG TUCKER&SON,INC. $4,565.94 INSTRUMENT PARTS "I 153149 UNDERSEA GRAPHICS,INC. $80.81 PHOTO PRINTS FROM VIDEO n 153150 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $18.65 PARCEL SERVICES I 153151 VWR SCIENTIFIC $5,985.05 LAB SUPPLIES 153152 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $5.698.53 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 153153 VARIAN CHROMATOGRAPHY SYSTEMS $1,296.56 LAB SUPPLIES 153154 VERNE'S PLUMBING $875.00 PLUMBING SERVICES 153155 WACKENHUT CORP. $5,246.09 CONTRACT SERVICESECURITY GUARDS 153156 WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION $1,365.00 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT COURSES 153157 WAKIE $512.81 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 153158 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $21.283.34 CAUSTIC SODA MO 8-23-95 153159 WEST-CITE SUPPLY CO. $672.31 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 153160 ROURKE,WOODRUFF 8 SPRADLIN $74,860.42 LEGAL SERVICES MO 7-26-95 153161 XEROX CORP. $10.809.63 COPIER LEASES 153162 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $1,714.07 LAB SUPPLIES 153163 YELLOW SPRINGS INSTRUMENT CO. $289.87 LAB SUPPLIES 153164 YORK INTERNATIONAL $85.15 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 07110M $2.354.716.31 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 07/0$/98 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07/10/96 POSTING DATE 07/10/96 SUMMARY AMOUNT 92 OPER FUND $12.568.64 93 OPER FUND $41.369.05 #3 CAP FAC FUND $16.522.92 #5 OPER FUND $3.494.13 #7 OPER FUND $12,052.39 #7 CAP FAC FUND $318.50 #11 OPER FUND $720.96 #14 OPER FUND $210.00 #5&6 OPER FUND $1,540.35 #6&7 OPER FUND $3.491.48 #7&14 OPER FUND $2.816.48 JT OPER FUND $606,937.65 CORE $1,466,247.71 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $80.530.52 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $105.895.63 m $2,354.716.31 x x bJ a m FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0723/96 PAGE 1 a REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07/24/96 POSTING DATE 0724/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 153192 ABE LOGISTICS CENTER $637.85 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 153193 AT&T-PROWATTS $201.42 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 153194 AT&T-CELLULAR CR&R $8.69 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 153195 AWSI $2,594.10 D.O.T. TRAINING 153196 ABRASIVE ENG.TOOLING&EQUIP. $231.04 HARDWARE 153197 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $719.03 LAB SUPPLIES 153198 ALHAMBRA FOUNDRY CO LM $6,62&63 MANHOLE FRAMES&COVERS 153199 AMERIDATA $1,015.22 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 153200 AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY $9.92 LAB SUPPLIES 153201 AMOCO ENERGY TRADING $46.124.48 NATURAL GAS MO 6.28-95 153202 ANALYSTS INC $1,111.75 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 153203 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL $330.00 SERVICEAGREEMENT 153204 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $824.30 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 153205 AQUATIC BIOASSAY&CONSULTANTS $2,070.00 LAB SERVICES 153206 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $5,060.20 PAYROLL SERVICES TIT 153207 - BANANA BLUEPRINT $4,393.35 PRINTING M.O.11-07-94 X 153208 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $986.65 BATTERIES ._.�153209 BAUER COMPRESSOR $201.07 COMPRESSOR PARTS DU 153210 BAVCO $605.15 REPAIR KIT --4 153211 BAKTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $1,940.85 LAB SUPPLIES 153212 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $850.80 TRUCK WASH TICKETS �153213 BIOMERIELI%VITEK,INC. 5503.08 LAB SUPPLIES r 153214 BLACK&VEATCH $11.105.60 ENGINEERING SERVICES MO 4-26-95.Pl46&P2-55 153215 BOOT BARN $118.42 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 153216 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $327.32 ENGINEERING SERVICES 5.37-3,5-37d 153217 BRINKMANN INSTRUMENTS INC $160.07 LAB SUPPLIES 153210 BRISTOL-MEYERS SQUIBB $107.68 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 153219 BRTTHINEE ELECTRIC $877.66 ELECTRIC PARTS 153220 BROCK&ASSOCIATES $9,886.03 MANAGEMENT TRAINING 153221 BROOKS INSTRUMENT DIV. $223.73 INSTRUMENT 153222 CEM CORPORATION $17.853.08 LAB SUPPLIES 153223 CS COMPANY $3.542.47 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 153224 CAMP DRESSER&MC KEY INC $2,334.36 ENGINEERING SERVICES 153226 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $24.590.53 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-38,P243-3 153226 CARRERA CONSULTING GROUP $30,000.00 BID BOND REFUND 153227 CASA $150,00 REGISTRATION 153228 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $819,25 OFFICE FURNITURE 153229 CENTURY SAFETY MST.&SUPPLY $178.06 SAFETY SUPPLIES 153230 CERFNET $2000 COMPUTER SERVICES 153231 CHASE.ROTCHFORD,DRUKKER $918.22 LEGAL SERVICES NO 12-1 -94 153232 CLARK CONTRACTING CO $11,031,01 EMERG.REPAIR OF BENT TREE PUMP STATION 153233 CLAYTON ENVIRO CONSULT $11,505,00 INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE SERVICES 153234 COMMUNICATION PERFORMANCE GROUP $17,90000 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MO 10-25.95 153235 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $%52&06 PUMP PARTS 153236 COMPUTER LIBRARY $2,580.61 SUBSCRIPTION 153237 CONNELL GM PARTS/DIV. $174.59 TRUCK PARTS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0723196 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0724MS POSTING DATE 0724M WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 153238 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $2,391.55 ELECTRIC PARTS 153239 CONSOLIDATED FREIGHIWAYS $11058.50 FREIGHT 153240 CONSOLIDATED REPROGRAPHICS $703.93 PRINTING SERVICES 153241 CONTINENTAL GRAPHICS $78.87 PRINTING 153242 DOUG COOK $1,048.D3 EXPENSE REIMB. IS3243 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $3,218.13 ENGINE PARTS 153244 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $500.32 TRUCK PARTS 153245 COUNTERPART ENTERPRISES $64.74 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 153246 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $5,598.78 ELECTRIC PARTS 153247 CUSTOM CELLULAR $1,287.53 PORTABLE FACSIMILE KIT 153248 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $32,734.00 1995-96 SALES TAX 153249 DCC I CAL INC $184.25 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 153250 ALBERT W DAVIES INC 522,039.05 CONSTRUCTION 3-36R 1632SI DE GUELLE&SONS GLASS CO $145.26 SAFETY GLASS 153252 DELL MARKETING L.P. $23,447.48 COMPUTERS M 153253 -CEL MAR ANALYTICAL $760.00 BIOSOLIDS ANALYSIS X 153254 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIF. $36,632.29 DENTAL INSURANCE PLAN MO.1-12.94 ._+ 153255 DIAMOND LINERS INC $775.34 TRUCK BED LINERS 153250 DIVERSIFIED INSPECTION $522.00 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT .� 153257 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $2.406.28 PAINT SUPPLIES 153258 ELECTRICAL INSULATION $109.71 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 153259 ENCHANTER,INC. S2.1D0.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5.24-95 N 153260 DARRELL ENNIS $136.55 EXPENSE REIMB. 153261 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $1,011.60 LAB SERVICES 153262 EXIDE ELECTRONICS $2,724.22 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 153263 EXPRESS SYSTEMS INC. $2.924.50 SOFTWARE 153264 FLUID TECH.SALES $1,386.98 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 153265 FASTFRAME OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $108.83 AWARDS FRAMING 153266 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $475.70 AIR FREIGHT 153267 FILTER SUPPLY CO. 55,129.83 FILTERS 153268 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $2,386.62 LAB SUPPLIES 153259 FISONS INSTRUMENTS $7,579.25 SERVICE AGREEMENT 153270 FLOSYSTEMS $9.577.30 PUMP PARTS 153271 FORKERT ENGINEERING B SURVEY $4.605.05 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES M06A-94 IS3272 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $40.33 PHOTO SUPPLIES 153273 FRYS ELECTRONICS $830.52 ELECTRONIC 8 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 153274 CITY OF FULLERTON $39.30 WATER USE 153275 FURON CO. $59.24 FREIGHT 153276 GST,INC. $1,307.28 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1532T7 GENERAL PETROLEUM $21.009.17 PREIMIUM UNLEADED GASOLINE 153270 GIERUCH-MTTCHELL,INC. $19,537.44 PUMP PARTS 163279 W W GRAINGER.INC. $80.25 COMPRESSOR PARTS 153280 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $240.24 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 153261 GRASSY S.T.I. $1.102.25 ENGINE PARTS 153202 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $1,169.91 PRINTING 153283 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $1,000.53 PLUMBING SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 07/23/96 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07124M POSTING DATE 07/24/98 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 153284 HATCH&KIRK,INC. $20.84 TRUCK PARTS 153285 PL HAWN CO,INC. $1,837.49 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 153286 HILTI,INC. $1,437.28 TOOLS 153287 HI STANDARD AUTOMOTIVE $1,352.25 TRUCK PARTS 153288 RC HOFFMAN AND/OR ISCO $368.69 LAB SUPPLIES 1$3289 HOFFMAN SOUTHWEST $840.00 VIDEO SEWER INSPECTION 153290 HOME DEPOT $160.41 SMALL HARDWARE 953291 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $11,185.76 WATER USE 153292 IPCO SAFETY $5,638.89 SAFETY SUPPLIES 153293 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $4,294.89 CONNECTORS 153294 INORGANIC VENTURES $252.28 LAB SUPPLIES 153295 INTELLIGENCE PRESS,INC. $825.00 SUBSCRIPTION 153296 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $684.70 BATTERIES 153297 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $5.54 WATER USE 153298 JP MORGAN SECURITIES $23.371.57 COP REMARKETING AGREEMENT 153299 JAMISON ENGINEERING $16,718.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES Q 153300 DEE JASPAR&ASSOC. $5,260.61 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 153301 JAYS CATERING $586.84 DIRECTORS MEETING EXPENSE 2 153302 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $1,598.01 ELECTRIC PARTS 153303 JONES CHEMICALS,INC. $2,067.63 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE MO 4-26.95 -I 153304 KEENAN SUPPLY $1,092.22 PLUMBING SUPPLIES Qy 153305 KEMIRON PACIFIC,INC. $113,595.39 FERRIC CHLORIDE MO 9-27-95 I 153306 KING BEARING,INC. $10188.12 MACHINE SUPPLIES W 153307 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $7.289.37 TOOLS 153308 LASHER DODGE $16.549.32 TRUCK 153309 LEG$-TECH $3,840.00 COMPUTER SERVICES 153310 LEE&RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC. $27.931.68 ENGINEERING SERVICES 153311 LIEBERT CORPORATION $24,126.00 ELECTRIC PARTS 153312 K.P.LINDSTROM,INC. $1,125.00 ENVIR.CONSULTING SERVICES MO 12-9.90 153313 LOS ANGELES TIMES $176.04 SUBSCRIPTION 153314 MDT BIOLOGIC COMPANY $938.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 153315 MPS $901.54 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 153316 MANHOLE ADJUSTING $4,125.00 ADJUST MANHOLE FRAMES B COVERS 153317 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $139.91 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 153318 G R MCKERVEY $9.446.19 EMERGENCY REPAIR ON SUNFLOWER TRUNK 153319 MICROBICS CORPORATION $636.14 LAB SUPPLIES 153320 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3,100.54 UNIFORM RENTALS 153321 MONTEREY HYATT REGENCY $137.50 CASA REGISTRATION 153322 MONTEREY QUALITY CONFERENCE $195.00 CASA REGISTRATION 153323 MORELAND&ASSOCIATES $2,189.00 AUDITING SERVICES MO 3-8-95 153324 MOTOROLA,INC. $33,198.21 INSTRUMENT PARTS 153325 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES $45,094.44 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 153326 G ROBERT NEASE PHOTOGRAPHY $4,599.00 BROCHURE PHOTOS 153327 NETWORK GENERAL CORP. $2,250.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 153328 NEUTRON $5.939.14 ANIONIC POLYMER M.O.6.10.94 153329 NORCO DELIVERY SERVICE $98.20 MAIL DELIVERY SERVICE FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 07/23196 PAGE4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07124/96 POSTING DATE 07/24M WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 153330 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $488.54 SAFETY GLASSES 153331 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $276.54 OFFICE SUPPLIES 153332 OMNI WESTERN INC $1,375.63 TOOLS 153333 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $2,023.44 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 153334 ORANGE COURIER $89.10 COURIER SERVICES IS3335 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. $1,786.94 FITTINGS 153336. ORTIZ FIRE PROTECTION $2.209.00 SPRINKLER SYSTEM REPAIR 153337 OXYGEN SERVICE $2,606.34 SPECIALTY GASES 153338 COUNTY OF ORANGE $4.747.50 MUNICIPAL RADIO SERVICES 153339 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $9.346.99 WORKERS COMP.REIMB. 153340 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT $37,700.40 GAP WATER USE M.0.6-9-93 153341 P&D CONSULTANTS INC $1.794.44 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 153342 PSOC(POOL SUPPLY OF OC) $99.32 OPERATING SUPPLIES 153343 PSSI $4.550,80 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION 153344 PACIFIC PARTS $304.69 INSTRUMENT PARTS m 153345 PADRE JANITORIAL SUPPLY $158.93 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES X 153348 PAGENET $675.87 RENTAL EQUIPMENT X—153347 PARKER HANNIFIN CORP. $65,17 FILTER REGULATOR Lb 153348 PARKHOUSE TIRE,INC. $372.51 TIRES 153349 PARTS UNLIMITED $318.22 TRUCK PARTS 153350 PEEK MEASUREMENT $5.983.00 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 153351 PEABODY $108.99 PUMP PARTS F 153352 PERSONNEL POLICY SERVICE INC $397.00 PUBLICATION 153353 PERVO PAINT $77.58 PAINT 153354 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $497.39 REIMB.PETTY GASH 153355 PIMA GIRD SYSTEMS,INC. $102.980.70 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3.211-95 153356 PITNEY BOWES $306.55 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 153357 U.S.FILTER AND/OR $1.262.75 LAB SUPPLIES 153358 POLYPURE,INC. $28,19T47 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92 153359 POSITIVE FORMULATORS,INC. $261.76 CHEMICALS 153360 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $176.00 ICE FOR SAMPLES 153361 PRODUCTION,CONSULTING&CONST $88.90 PUBUCATION 153362 PULSAFEEDER $353.85 PUMP PARTS 153363 QUICKSTART TECHNOLOGIES $6,375.00 SOFTWARE CONSULTANT 153364 R&R INSTRUMENTS $1,165.35 ELECTRIC PARTS 153365 RED WING SHOES 598.27 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 153368 MCJUNKIN CORPORATION $1.068.68 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 153367 RONAN ENGINEERING CO $363.56 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 153368 ROSEN'S ELECTRIC $1,117.54 ELECTRIC SUPPUES 153369 ROYCE PRODUCTIONS $1.000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 153370 SARBS-CWEA-PDC,INC. $1,30O00 REGISTRATION 153371 R.CRAIG SCOTT&ASSOC. $1.457,60 LEGAL SERVICES-PERSONNEL ISSUES 153372 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $146.34 SPECIALTY GASES 153373 SEA COAST DESIGNS $4.982.37 LAB SUPPLIES 153374 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $1.977.07 TOOLS 153375 SHURELUCK SALES $57.05 TOOLSIHARDWARE FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0723M PAGE 5 ' REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0724196 POSTING DATE 0724IN WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 153376 SIEVERS INSTRUMENTS INC. $395.34 LAB SUPPLIES 153377 SMITH-EMERY CO. $4.427.50 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-13-94 153378 SO COAST AIR QUALITY $665.50 PERMIT FEES 153379 SO COAST AIR QUALITY $686.97 PERMIT FEES 153380 SO CALIF EDISON CO $51.195.64 POWER 153381 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $20,955.11 NATURAL GAS 153382 SO.CALIFORNIA MARINE INST. $800.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 153383 SO.CALIF.WATER CO. $55.28 WATER USE 153384 STANDARD SUPP&EQUIP CO $297.03 MECHANICAL PARTS 153385 STATE STREET BANK $3,500.00 COP TRUSTEE SERVICES 153386 STROMBERG PRODUCTS $568.42 OFFICE SUPPLIES 153387 SUMMIT STEEL $2,816.15 METAL 153358 SUPELCO,INC. $253.51 LAB SUPPLIES 153389 TRW-REDI $666.11 PARCEL DATA 153390 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $874.26 ELECTRIC CART PARTS M 153391 TECHNOMIC PUBLISHING CO IN $55.00 PUBLICATION X 153392 TEXAS COMMERCE BANK $6,692.21 COP TRUSTEE SERVICES �153393 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $5.060.71 MECHANICAL PARTS W 153394 TIME MOTION TOOLS $75.87 MULTIMETER -1153395 TIME WARNER COMMUNICATIONS $36.78 CABLE SERVICES 163396 TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY,INC. $6,441.00 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.O.&11.94 t"153397 TRUCK B AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $656.95 TRUCK PARTS In 153398 JG TUCKER 8 SON,INC. $149.70 INSTRUMENT PARTS 153399 MICHELLE TUCHMAN $674.03 EXPENSE REIMB. 153400 TUSTIN DODGE $22.55 TRUCK PARTS 153401 TWINING LABORATORIES $247.35 SOIL TESTING M.O.7.13.94 153402 U.S.AUTO GLASS CENTERS $79.74 TRUCK PARTS 153403 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $296.00 LAB SUPPLIES 1534M UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $45.82 PARCEL SERVICES 153405 DATAVAULT I US SAFE DEPOSIT CO $94.00 BACK-UP TAPE STORAGE 153406 VWR SCIENTIFIC $8.884.05 LAB SUPPLIES 153407 VALLEY DEiTROIT DIESEL $8,316.95 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 153408 VALVATE ASSOCIATES $284A0 VALVES 153409 VANIER BUSINESS FORMS $1,456.79 OFFICE SUPPLIES 153410 VARIAN CHROMATOGRAPHY SYS $342.36 LAB SUPPLIES 153411 VERTEX TECHNOLOGIES,INC. $539.71 FIBER OPTICS 153412 V 8 E TREE SERVICE INC. $14.975.00 GROUNDSKEEPING 153413 VILLAGE NURSERIES $88.18 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 153414 WACKENHUT CORP. $8,364.84 CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS 153415 WAL-CON CONSTRUCTION CO. $46,834.67 CONSTRUCTION&37-3 153416 WASTE MARKETS $12,049.54 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 3.27-96 153417 THE WASTEWATER CONNECTION $684.71 MANHOLE COVER REMOVER 153418 WEST COAST INSTRUMENTS $264.T7 GAUGE 15309 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $20.929.76 CAUSTIC SODA MO&23.95 153420 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $24,077.00 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE MO4-24-96 153421 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $1,379.94 MURIATIC ACID MO 3.27-96 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 07123MO PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0724/88 POSTING DATE 0724196 WARRANTNO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 153422 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $1,009.12 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 153423 WESCO DISTRIBUTION INC. $517.20 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 153424 NANCY WHEATLEY $481.31 EXPENSE REIMS. 153425 ROURKE,WOODRUFF&SPRADLIN $58.982.89 LEGAL SERVICES NO 7-26-95 153426 XEROX CORP. $7.480.56 COPIER LEASES TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 0724M $1,411.649.28 SUMMARY AMOUNT #1 OPER FUND $593.60 #1 CONST FUND $2,727.93 #2 OPER FUND $15.456.62 m - #2 CAP FAC FUND $1,794.44 X 02 CONST FUND $7.502.31 2 #3 OPER FUND $22,260.15 #3 CAP FAC FUND $36,256.85 #3 CONST FUND $9.139.02 #5 OPER FUND $4.939.46 to #6 OPER FUND $244.93 #6 CONST FUND $1.909.87 #7 OPER FUND $46.236.07 07 CAP FAC FUND $152.63 07 CONST FUND $2.045.86 611 OPER FUND $3,123.01 #11 CAP FAC FUND $14.979.75 #11 CONST FUND $3.545.58 #14 OPER FUND $297.50 _ 0586 OPER FUND $9.69 #588 CAP FAC FUND $47.172.98 JT OPER FUND $747,662.51 CORP $217.567.50 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $53,010.30 ,IT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $173,119.71 $1.411.649.28 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE-VARIOUS PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID-MISCELLANEOUS HANDWRITE WARRANTS WARRANTDATE WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 07/11/96 153165 JAMES CONG $1.131.34 EXPENSE REIMB. 07/11/96 153166 KERRY CONSULTING GROUP $10,364A2 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MO I1-15.95 07/17/96 153185 CITYOFANAHEIM $282.00 BUSINESS LICENSE 07/17/96 153186 CITY OF ANAHEIM $728.00 ENCROACHMENT PERMIT 07/17/96 153187 CALIF SOCIETY OF MUNICIPAL $40.00 CSMFO LUNCHEON 07117I98 153188 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION $359.99 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK FEE 07/17/96 153189 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $205.00 BUSINESS LICENSE 07117/96 153190 CITY OF WESTMINSTER $160.00 BUSINESS LICENSE 07/22/96 153191 CASA $185.00 CASA REGISTRATION m 0725MG 153427 ROBERT F.DRIVER ASSOC $1,239.450.50 RISK PROPERTY&EARTHQUAKE INSURANCE NO 6-26-96 x x 0726/98 153428 MORELAND BASSOCVITE3 $1,735.00 AUDIT SERVICES MO 3-8-95 07I30/96 153437 ROURKE 8 WOODRUFF 8 SPRADLIN $20.000.00 LEGAL SERVICES MO 7-26-95 h+ 08/08/96 153736 THE BALBOA SAY CLUB $3.314.70 NEWPORT SPILL CLAIM OB/OB/96 153737 JOHN COLLINS $700.00 CASA CASH ADVANCE 08/08/95 153738 JOHN C.COX.JR. $700.00 CASA CASH ADVANCE I 08/08196 153739 JAN DEBAY $700.00 CASA CASH ADVANCE 08/08196 153740 TAKE CHARGE CONSULTANTS $26,777.15 MANAGEMENT TRAINING 08/09/96 153741 SEBASTIANO SERRANTINO $1,714.00 SETTLEMENT TOTAL CLAIMS PAID $1,308.546.80 SUMMARY AMOUNT JT OPER FUND $51,378.48 CORF $10.364.12 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $1,244,47920 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $2.325.00 $1,305.546.80 v AGENDA s v" ITEM TRANSMITTAL MEETING DATE NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION (Initials of Originator) OMrs: PDC: FAHR: 2220/Bill Aldridge/2552 EXEC. All m STEER: � � oNision No..Name,and EHenslan JT.BDS:0925M AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Agenda Wording: RATIFYING PAYMENT OF CLAIMS OF THE JOINT AND INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS BY ROLL CALL VOTE (each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District). Recommended Action(s): Staff recommends approval of payment of claims/warrant listing CEQA REVIEW: Project is Exempt: NOT APPLICABLE DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM: Date Notice of Ex mptiam Filed: Negative Declaration Approved on N/A Final EIR Approved on_and Notice of Determination filed on BUDGET INFORMATION CURRENT YEAR CURRENTYEAR- YEAR-TOAATE REVISED BUDGET TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.: $ BUDGET AMOUNT TO-DATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL SOURCE: DISTRICTS EXPENDITURES 1.1ftYadelu.T—de.1 Schedule/Une Item: AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: Schedus/1-1 a Uem: ARIPROJECT COST INFORMATION ORIGINAL BID,PO, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED PROJECT CONTRACT FUNDS PREV. REQUESTED THIS AMOUNT AMOUNT APPROVED AR WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? NOTAPPLICABLE If YES,state number: PemaneM LoniftedlTenon IfYES,explain in ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section Cq-RWRRENCES: {,, ATTACHMENTS TO AGENDA(List) N KX ' /Ld . ' H To Committee: 1. g at a Date Divi n ana er r rature Date To JL Bills.: 1. Warrant Usting epartment kZd(Or Designee) Signature Date Assistant General Manager(Or Designee) r Y ADDITIONAL INFORMATION(Bwkgmnd arM/or Summary) PK:Ig c: Department Head AGM-Administra0on AGM-Operations General Manager J:\W PDOCIAGENDA W ITSSBISEP\WARRANT.LST Page 2 of 2 ReNabn: 8Q&95 FUND NO 9199 - Jr DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 08/20/95 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID O6/21M POSTING DATE 08/21/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 153767 ACWA $150.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING 153768 API/ROMA INC $7.540.00 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 153769 ARMA INTERNATIONAL $585.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 153770 A T&T-CELLULAR CR&R $14.08 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 153771 A T&T-CELLULAR CR&R $4.71 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 153772 AWUVAANOT CONFERENCE $80.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING 153773 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $36.657.56 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.O.8-9-89 153774 AKCENT $50.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 153775 AMERIDATA $26.721.98 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 153776 AMERICAN PAYROLL ASSOC. $590.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 153777 AMER.SOCIETY FOR MICROBIOLOGY $519.00 PUBLICATION 153778 BLAKE P.ANDERSON $91.83 REIMBURSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE 153779 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $641.52 NOTICES&ADS 163780 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT $1.071.13 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 153781 ATKINIJONES COMPUTER SERVICE 5321.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT 153782 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $3,695.15 PAYROLL SERVICES 153783 AWARDS&TROPHIES $25.17 PLAQUES 153784 BFI MEDICAL WASTE SYSTEMS $47.40 WASTE DISPOSAL 163785 E S BABCOCK&SONS INC $270.00 LAB ANALYSIS 153785 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $373.35 BATTERIES 153787 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $422.00 TRUCK WASH TICKETS 153788 BIO-GRO DIVISION $69.991.63 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 4-26-95 153789 BOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE $45.00 TRUCK REPAIRS 153790 BON-A-RUES $180.55 TRUCK PARTS 163791 BOOT BARN $312.16 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 153792 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $53,309.97 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-10 153793 BOZNANSKI&CO.,INC. $4,500.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 153794 BUSH&ASSOCIATES,INC. $8,311.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-8-94 153795 MICROBAC LABORATORIES,INC. $360.00 CONTRACT SERVICE 153796 CS COMPANY $64.39 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 153797 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $859.13 SERVICE AGREEMENT 153798 CALIF CENTRIFUGAL PUMP $1,050.00 PUMP PARTS 153799 CALIFORNIA LABORATORIES&DEV $4.372.25 MAINTENANCE 153800 CALIF RELOCATION SERVICES $209.00 RELOCATION 153801 CAMAU CORP. $1,300.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 153802 CANUS CORPORATION $5,200.00 FIBER OPTIC CABLE 153803 CAROLLO ENGINEERS $107.323.19 ENGINEERING SER. M.O.5.12-93,3.27-96,5-24-95,8.23.95 153804 CASA $9.000.00 MEMBERSHIP FEES 153805 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. S2.219.08 OFFICE FURNITURE 1538M CERFNET $20.00 COMPUTER SERVICES 153B07 CETAC TECHNOLOGIES,INC. $284.65 LAB SUPPLIES 153808 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $155.39 SERVICE AGREEMENT 153809 COAST TRANSMISSION $200.35 AUTO SUPPLY 153810 COUCH&SONS $141,182.00 CONSTRUCTION 11-17-1 153811 COMPUSERVE $187.42 COMPUTER SERVICES 153812 CONNELL GM PARTS/DIV. $217.77 TRUCK PARTS FUND NO 9199 - H DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0820/96 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0821/98 POSTING DATE 0821/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 153813 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $1.408.78 ELECTRIC PARTS 153814 CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS $490.03 FREIGHT 153815 CONSUMER PIPE $3&47 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 153816 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $1,684.32 ENGINE PARTS 153817 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $134.27 TRUCK PARTS 153818 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $211.45 ELECTRIC PARTS 153819 CRANE PRO SERVICES $3,248.72 CRANE REPAIR 153820 CAL STATE UNIV FULLERTON $250.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 153821 DCC/CAL INC $1,196.03 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 153822 J.W.D'ANGELO CO.,INC. $146.36 BUILDING MATERIALS 153823 DAY TIMERS INC. $32.85 SUBSCRIPTIONS 153824 DE GUELLE&SONS GLASS CO $510.65 SAFETY GLASS 153825 DELL MARKETING L.P. $3.232.50 COMPUTER 153826 DELMARANALYTICAL $380.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 153827 DELTA PACKAGING PRODUGTSJNC. $154.30 LAB SUPPLIES 163828 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $1,011.22 PAINT SUPPLIES 153529 ESP NORTH $1,062.27 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 153830 EDWARDS DIV.OF GS BLDG SYS. $2,721.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 153831 ELECTRA-BOND,INC. $1,59T39 ROLLER BRACKET REPAIR 153832 EMERGENCY MGMT NETWORK $2,405.00 CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING 153833 ENCHANTER,INC. $3,500.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5-24-95 153834 FLUID TECH.SALES 5845.39 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 153835 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $346.25 AIR FREIGHT 153836 THE FEED BARN $627.97 BREAK AREA FURNITURE 153837 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $1,181.31 FILTERS 153838 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $1,135.27 LAB SUPPLIES 153839 FLOSYSTEMS $202.69 PUMP PARTS 153840 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $43.63 PHOTO SUPPLIES 153841 FRAZEE PAINT&WALLCOVERING $97.75 PAINT SUPPLIES 153842 FRV'S ELECTRONICS $2,73B.82 ELECTRONIC&COMPUTER SUPPLIES 163843 GST,INC. $1,199.38 OFFICE SUPPLIES 153844 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $1,770.33 CHEMICALS 153645 GE IND&POWER SYSTEMS $3.790.14 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 153946 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $5,680.65 TELEPHONE SERVICES 153847 THOMAS GRAY&ASSOC INC $624.00 LAB SERVICES 163848 DGA CONSULTANTS $1,366.00 ENGINEERING SER.M.O.6.8-94 153849 GRIFFIN CARRICK $9.128.06 LEGAL SERVICES-TECHITE M.G.9-27-95 153850 HLO&ASSOC. $7,600.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 163861 HS TYPE&GRAPHICS $592.95 PRINTING 153852 PETER HASS $740.25 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 153853 HATCH&KIRK,INC. $39.16 TRUCK PARTS 153854 MIKE HERRERA $250.00 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 153855 HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT $2,083.33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN. 153856 HOLMES&NARVER,INC. $11,253.97 ENGINEERING SERVICES Pid4 153857 HOME DEPOT $154.01 SMALL HARDWARE 153858 JILL HOWARD $638.20 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 08/20/96 PAGE 3 ' REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0821M POSTING DATE 0821196 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 153859 PIS HUGHES CO,INC. $81.77 PAINT SUPPLIES 153860 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $15.77 WATER USE 153861 HUNTINGTON AMC/JEEP/RENAULT $32.33 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS 15386E HUNPS FINAL PHASE $SW.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 153863 HYCLONE LABORATORIES $574.53 LAB SUPPLIES 153864 IPCO SAFETY $14.706.55 SAFETY SUPPLIES 153865 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $571.97 CONNECTORS 153866 INDUSTRIAL WASTE $39.00 SUBSCRIPTION 153867 INGERSOLL-RAND EQUIP CORP $12,068.00 COMPRESSOR 163868 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. $408.23 TRUCK PARTS 153869 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $41.59 WATER USE 153870 JAMISON ENGINEERING $2,083.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 163871 JAYS CATERING $1,369.06 DIRECTORS MEETING EXPENSE 153872 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $70.23 ELECTRIC PARTS 153873 KABSARA ENGINEERING $962.58 ENGINEERING SERVICE 153874 KEMIRON PACIFIC,INC. $47.711.74 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.9.27-95 153875 KERRY CONSULTING GROUP $4,102.95 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES M.O. 11-15.95 153876 KING BEARING,INC. $142.89 MACHINE SUPPLIES 153877 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $1,719.72 TOOLS ISM78 LA MOTTE CHEMICAL PRODUCTS $90.68 CHEMICALS 153879 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY CO. $108.01 SAFETY SUPPLIES 153880 LAMSON CORPORATION $214.62 FILTER 153881 LEE&RO CONSULTING ENGR. $32,402.67 ENGINEERING SERVICES M.O.5.24-95,512-93,12-8-93 153882 CHARLES G.LEE $295.93 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 153083 LEWELLYN TECHNOLOGY,INC. $1,000.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 153884 LIMITORQUE CORP. $1,594.76 ELECTRIC PARTS 153985 K.P.LINDSTROM,INC. $10,286.32 ENVIR.CONSULTING SERVICES MO 12.9.90 153886 LOVE AT FIRST BITE B CO. $241.76 CATERING 153887 LYLE SCREENPRINTING $38.79 PICNIC EXPENSE 153888 MPS 5288.33 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 153889 MAG SYSTEMS $345.82 INSTRUMENT PARTS 153890 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS,INC. $482.81 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 153891 MAMCO INTERNATIONAL $506.86 JANITORAL SUPPLIES 153892 HARDEN SUSCO INC. $732.16 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 153893 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $46,694.03 CONSTRUCTION P2-42-2 153894 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $142.19 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 153895 MATT-CHLOR,INC. $944.46 FERRIC CHLORIDE SUPPLIES 153896 MCGARRY CENTRAL BUSINESS PROD $1,426.00 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 153897 DONALD F.MCINTYRE $107.20 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 153898 MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. $421.05 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 153899 MES COMPANY $988.07 REBUILD ROLLER BELT 163900 MINNESOTA WESTERN VISUAL PRIES. $55S6 LAB SUPPLIES 163901 MISSION ABRASIVE SUPPLIES $478.41 WELDING SUPPLIES 153902 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3,367.95 UNIFORM RENTALS 153903 PETE MORRISON $855.23 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 153904 MORTON SALT $536.95 BOILER CONDITIONING FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE OMOIN PAGE4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0821196 POSTING DATE 0821198 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 153905 NEWPORT EXTERMINATION $2,700.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 153906 NICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY $6,522.83 LUBRICANTSIDIESEL FUEL 153907 NORCO DELIVERY SERVICE $98.20 MAIL DELIVERY SERVICE 153908 DAG FLIGHTDISK $1.044.54 SOFTWARE 153909 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $276.54 SAFETY GLASSES 153910 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $2,472.69 OFFICE SUPPLIES 153911 OMNI WESTERN INC. $12.81 HAND TOOLS 153912 ROBERTJ.00TON $776.23 MANAGEMENT TRAINING 153913 OPERATION TECHNOLOGY,INC. $1,806.47 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 153914 THE ORANGE COUNTY FORUM $80.00 MEMBERSHIP 153915 ORANGE COUNTY SEPTIC SERV. $3.172.00 PIPE REPAIR 153918 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $651.51 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 153917 ORTIZ FIRE PROTECTION $4.300.52 FIRE SPRINKLER REPAIR 153918 OXYGEN SERVICE $2,972.42 SPECIALTY GASES 153919 COUNTY OF ORANGE $65,000.00 DEPOSIT,AGREEMENT D9S107 153920 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $17.915.25 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP 163921 OCEMA $13,650.00 ENGINEERING SERVICE M.O.5-22-96 153922 PSI $567.07 STEAM CLEANING SERVICES 153923 PS51 $2,698.20 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION 153924 PACIFIC INVESTMENT MGMT CO. $123.493.00 INVESTMENT MGMT.SERVICE RESOL.95-75 153925 PACIFIC PARTS $607.60 INSTRUMENT PARTS 163925 PACIFIC BELL $77.05 TELEPHONE SERVICES 153927 PACIFIC ENERGY ASSOC.,INC. $300.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 153928 PADRE JANITORIAL SUPPLY $554.64 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 153929 PAPER SHOWCASE $24.95 TRAINING SUPPLIES 153930 PARTS UNLIMITED $112.41 TRUCK PARTS 153931 PEDERSON COMMUNICATIONS $875.00 CABLE REPLACEMENT 163932 PERFORMANCE ANALYTICAL $545.00 LAB SERVICE 153933 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $1,008.01 REIMS.PETTY CASH 153934 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $113,667.30 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3-29-95 153935 POLYPURE,INC. $49,417.35 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92 153938 PONTON INDUSTRIES,INC. $18,140.56 METERS 153937 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $20&00 ICE FOR SAMPLES 163938 PROMINENT FLUID CONTROL,INC. $2,397.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 153939 PRYOR RESOURCES,INC. $345.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 153940 PYRAMID FENCE COMPANY $723.00 FENCING INSTALLATION 153941 QUICKSTART TECHNOLOGIES $3,675.00 SOFTWARE 153942 R&R INSTRUMENTS $64.19 ELECTRIC PARTS 153943 REAL TIME SYSTEMS CDR $2.216.00 METER REPAIR 163944 REDWINGSHOES $282.73 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 153945 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DIST $279.53 ELECTRIC MOTOR 153946 THE REGISTER $1,975.20 NOTICES&ADS 153947 ROSEMOUNT ANALYTICAL,INC. $1.337.98 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 153946 S&J CHEVROLET $182.86 TRUCK REPAIRS 153949 SAWPA 535,000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 153950 SARBS-PDC $200.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE O820/96 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 082126 POSTING DATE 0521/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 153951 SANTA ANA RIVER FLOOD $1,100.00 MEMBERSHIP 153952 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $110.40 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 153953 SARATOGA INSTITUTE,INC. $963.20 PUBLICATION 153954 SEA COAST DESIGNS $1,170.63 LAB SUPPLIES 153955 CITY OF SEAL BEACH $202.90 WATER USE 163956 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $732.70 TOOLS 153957 SHURELUCK SALES $2,250.53 TOOLSMARDWARE 153958 MIKE SILBERMANN EQUIP RENTAL $22,900.00 SEWER REPAIR 153959 SMITH-EMERY CO. $2.155.50 SOIL TESTING M.O1A3,94 153960 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP. $970.78 TOOLS 153961 SO CO AIR QUAL MAN DIST $4,940.00 CARS EMISSION FEES 153962 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY $32.580.68 ANNUAL EMMISSIONS FEES M.O.6-26-96 153963 SOUTH COAST WATER $125.00 LAB SUPPLIES 153964 SO CALIF EDISON CO $58.040.37 POWER 153M SO.CAL GAS.CO. $481.45 NATURAL GAS 163966 SPEK CERTIPREP INC. $326.37 LAB SUPPLIES 153967 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION $350.00 UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE FEE 153988 SUMMIT STEEL $402.56 METAL 153969 SUNSET FORD $174.97 TRUCK PARTS 153970 SUPER POWER PRODUCTS $538.75 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 163971 SVERDRUP CIVIL,INC. $360,578.20 CONSTRUCTION P2-3",P1-38-5,P2.46,P2-55 153972 T&C INDUSTRIAL CONTROLS $1,830.70 ELECTRONIC PARTS 153973 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $1,405.34 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 153974 TAYLOR INDUSTRIAL SOFTWARE $4.850.00 SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE 153975 THINK EARTH ENVIR ED.FOUND. $7.000.00 MEMBERSHIP 153976 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $1,385.16 MECHANICAL PARTS 153977 TONER SYSTEM INTERNATIONAL 52,803A9 PRINTER SUPPLIES 153978 TRANSCAT $694.93 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 153979 TRUCK S AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $794.14 TRUCK PARTS 153980 JG TUCKER S SON,INC. $127.02 INSTRUMENT PARTS 153981 UNISPEC ENGINEERING $6.709.63 CONTROL SUPPLIES 153982 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $566.93 PARCEL SERVICES 153983 VWR SCIENTIFIC $7,454.29 LAB SUPPLIES 1539M VALVATE ASSOCIATES $386.21 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 153985 VISION ENVIRO SERVICES,INC. $91989.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICE J-11-1-A 153986 WAL-CON CONSTRUCTION CO. $7.119.30 CONSTRUCTION 5.37-3 153987 WARREN GORHAM 8 LAMONT INC. $196.75 SUBSCRIPTION 153988 THE WASTEWATER CONNECTION $14,093.70 HERBICIDE 153989 WESTERN AIR $6.712.39 ENGINEERING SERVICE 153990 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $29,144.20 CAUSTIC SODA MO 8-23-95 153991 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL INC. $10,693.13 SODIUM HYPOCHLORTTE M.O.4-24-98 153992 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL $1,214.27 MURIATIC ACID RES.A9&32 163993 XEROX CORP. $1,002.08 COPIER LEASES TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 0821/96 $1,833.903.64 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE O8/20/96 PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID O8/21/96 POSTING DATE 08/21/96 SUMMARY AMOUNT #2 OPER FUND $1,140.34 #2 CAP FAC FUND $962.58 #3 OPER FUND $10,785.76 #3 CAP FAC FUND $9.368.06 #5 OPER FUND $273.28 97 OPER FUND $42,494.17 07 CAP FAC FUND $108,309.97 #11 OPER FUND $7.966.20 911 CAP FAC FUND $152.982.24 #5&6 CAP FAC FUND $8.859.30 #7&14 OPER FUND $14.76 JT OPER FUND $523,972.97 CORF $704,668.80 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $19,998.59 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $242.106.62 $1,833,903.64 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 08/05/98 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID ON07196 POSTING DATE O8/07/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 153438 AM BEST COMPANY $112.31 PUBLICATION 153439 AT&T-PROWATTS $2,911.88 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 153440 AT&T-MEGACOM SERVICE $939.44 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 153441 AT&T-CELLULARCR&R $12.60 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 153442 AT&T-CELLULARCR&R $1.26 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 153443 ABRASIVE ENG.TOOLING&EQUIP. $459.58 HARDWARE 153444 ACCU STANDARD $133.09 LAB SUPPLIES 153445 ADAMSON INDUSTRIES $02.41 LAB SUPPLIES 153446 AGSON INC. $109.50 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 153447 AIR LIQUIDE AMERICA CORP. $542.19 SPECIALTY GASSES 153448 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $36,644.00 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.O.8-9-89 153449 ALHAMBRA FOUNDRY CO LTD $0.368.03 MANHOLE FRAMES&COVERS 153450 AMERIDATA $0.128.84 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 153451 AMERICAN AIRLINES $2.050.26 TRAVEL SERVICES 153452 AMERICAN SIGMA $3.247.14 LAB SUPPLIES 153453 BLAKE P.ANDERSON $870.78 EXPENSE REIMS. 153454 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL $365.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 153455 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $2.947.70 NOTICES&ADS 153456 AQUATIC BIOASSAY&CONSULTING $470.00 LAB SERVICES 153457 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE,INC. $2,198.00 TOXIC WASTE REMOVAL 153468 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. $60.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL 153459 ASSOCIATED CONCRETE PRODUCTS $1.512.01 BUILDING MATERIALS 153460 AMSA $500.00 PUBLICATIONS 153481 ATKIWJONES COMPUTER SERVICE $321.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT 153462 RANDOLPH AUSTIN CO. $690.02 LAB SUPPLIES 153463 AWARDS&TROPHIES $111.19 PLAQUES 153464 BFI MEDICAL WASTE SYSTEMS $5.50 WASTE DISPOSAL 153465 E S BABCOCK&SONS INC $1,350.00 LAB ANALYSIS 153466 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $1,199.29 BATTERIES 153467 SAUER COMPRESSOR $128.81 COMPRESSOR PARTS 153468 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $393.30 TRUCK WASH TICKETS 153469 BIO-GRO DIVISION $117,798.87 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 4-2&95 153470 BLACK&VEATCH $702.02 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI.46&P2.55 153471 BONA-RUES $388.88 TRUCK PARTS 153472 BRANDALL MODULAR CORP $56,167.00 INFO.TECH.TRAILER MO4-24-N 153473 BROOKS INSTRUMENT DIV. $236.98 INSTRUMENT 153474 BUDGET JANITORIAL $3,330.00 JANITORIAL SERVICES MO 1-12-94 153475 BUSH&ASSOCIATES,INC. $840.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6.8.94 153476 BUSINESS ENTERPRISE $1,450.00 REGISTRATION 153477 CH2M HILL $75,532.09 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-31 163478 MICROBAC LABORATORIES $720,00 OAS ANALYSIS SERVICES 153479 C P&R CATALOG ORDER DEPT $55.00 PUBLICATION 153480 CS COMPANY $90.25 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 153481 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH $628.72 LAB SUPPLIES 163482 CALTROL,INC. $1,013.29 HARDWARE 153483 CALIF ASSOC.OF SAN.AGENCIES $640.00 WORK CONFERENCE REGISTRATION FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE O8MM6 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID M07/96 POSTING DATE OBM7/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 153484 CALIFORNIA JOURNAL INC $37.95 SUBSCRIPTION 153485 CALIF SOCIETY OF MUNICIPAL $60.00 REGISTRATION 153486 CAMP DRESSER S MC KEY INC $112,297.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 163487 CANUS CORPORATION $56,354.12 FIBER OPTIC CABLE 153488 CAPITAL WESTWARD $561.99 MECHANICAL PARTS 153489 CAROLLO ENGINEERS $34,686.04 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-38,P243-3 153490 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $7,667.26 OFFICE FURNITURE 153491 CENTURY SAFETY INST.B SUPPLY $222.16 SAFETY SUPPLIES 153492 CHAPMAN COUNSELING $3.600.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING 153493 CLEAN SOURCE $156.41 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 153494 COMMUNICATIONS PERFORMANCE GROUP $10,000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 153495 COMPUTERS AMERICA $2,116.23 PRINTER SUPPLIES 153496 CONNECTOR TECHNOLOGY,INC. $116.33 PERMIT CANCELLATION REFUND 153497 CONNELL GM PARTS/DIV. $42.75 TRUCK PARTS 153498 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $4,520.67 ELECTRIC PARTS 153499 CONSUMER PIPE $449.24 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 153500 CONTINENTAL EQUIPMENT B SUPPLY $3.222.06 TOOLS 153501 CONTRACTORS EQUIPMENT CO $98.62 AUTO PARTS 163502 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS OC $15,745.25 CONSULTING SERVICES M.O.8-11.93 153503 COUNTY CLERK $38.00 CEQA FILING FEE 153504 CA DEPT OF HEALTH SERVICES $3.527.00 ELAP CERTIFICATION FEE 153505 JAMES DARLINGTON $150.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 163506 ALBERT W.DAVIES.INC. $3,219.34 REMOVE TECHITE PIPE 153507 TOM DAWES $428.00 EXPENSE REIMS. 15350E DELL MARKETING L.P. $30.17 COMPUTER PARTS 153509 DEL MAR ANALYTICAL $190.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 153510 DIAMOND LINERS INC $387.67 TRUCK BED LINERS 153511 THE DICKSON COMPANY $161.00 LAB SUPPLIES 153612 DIETERICH-POST CO. $563.14 INSTRUMENT PARTS 153513 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $835.52 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 163514 MICHAEL F DILLON $6,024.50 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 153515 DOUBLETREE INN OF MONTEREY $298.00 ROOM RESERVATION FOR CASA CONF. 153516 ROBERT F.DRIVER ASSOC. $125,000.00 EXCESS LIABILITY INSURANCE NO 5-13.92,6-10.92 163617 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $999.28 PAINT SUPPLIES 153518 THE ECONOMICS PRESS,INC. $45.50 SUBSCRIPTION 153619 EMA/ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES $19.91 PUBLICATION 153520 ENS RESOURCES $2.808.29 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 153521 ESP NORTH $774.77 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 153522 ELCAN TECHNOLOGIES CORP $166.20 TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT 153523 ELECTRA-BOND,INC. $619.56 PUMP REPAIR 153524 EMERGENCY MOMT NETWORK $2.560.00 CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING 153525 ENCHANTER,INC. $5,600.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5-24-95 153526 FST SAND AND GRAVEL,INC. $262.40 ROAD BASE MATERIALS 153527 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $671.20 AIR FREIGHT 163528 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $597.95 FILTERS 153529 FIRST CHOICE $769.72 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT FUND NO 9199 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE O8105196 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID O8/07M POSTING DATE O8ffi7M WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 153530 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $7,880.48 LAB SUPPLIES 153531 FISONS INSTRUMENTS 523,054.70 SERVICE AGREEMENT 153532 FLO-SYSTEMS $1.374.05 PUMP PARTS 153533 FORD SAUVAJOT MGMT GROUP S2,3154AS CONSOLIDATION SERVICES 153534 FORKERT ENGINEERING&SURVEY $2,628.35 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MO 6-8-94 153535 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $114.96 PHOTO SUPPLIES 153536 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $17.609.48 WATER USE 153537 THE FOXBORO CO. $1,720.38 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 153538 FRANKLIN QUEST CO. $5,822.15 TIME MANAGEMENT TRAINING 153539 FRY'S ELECTRONICS $3.148.99 ELECTRONIC&COMPUTER SUPPLIES 153540 CITY OF FULLERTON $292.26 WATER USE 153541 GST,INC. $1,541.72 OFFICE SUPPLIES 153542 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $541.23 LUMBERIHARDWARE 153543 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $290.93 CHEMICALS 1535" GATES FIBERGLASS INSTALLERS $1.931.00 EMERGENCY TANK REPAIR 153545 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $4.982.21 TELEPHONE SERVICES 153646 GIERLICH4&ITCHELL,INC. $2,267.67 PUMP PARTS 153547 WIN GRAINGER,INC. $1.409.96 COMPRESSOR PARTS 153648 GRASSY S.T.I. $3,802.62 ENGINE PARTS 153549 GRAYBAR $1,228.05 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 153550 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $239.47 PRINTING SERVICES 153551 DOA CONSULTANTS $16.692.50 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O. 41-94 153552 HE TYPE&GRAPHICS $3.909.17 PRINTING 153553 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $333.91 TRUCK PARTS 153554 HARBOR TRUCK BODY $989.14 TRUCK PARTS 153555 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $352.88 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 153556 HATCH&KIRK,INC. $5,036.73 TRUCK PARTS 153557 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS $4.228.20 CONTAINER RENTALS 1535M RC HOFFMAN AND/OR ISCO $161.12 LAB SUPPLIES 153559 HOME DEPOT $152.05 SMALL HARDWARE 153560 IRS HUGHES CO,INC. $1.016.72 PAINTSUPPLIES 153561 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $11.168.05 WATER USE 153552 I D P $275.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 153663 IPCO SAFETY $4,919.72 SAFETY SUPPLIES 153564 INDUSTRIAL STEAM $375.63 PUMP 153585 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $1.076.00 CONNECTORS 153568 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. $28.90 TRUCK PARTS 153567 IBM CORPORATION#2899767 $348.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 153558 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $877.41 BATTERIES 163689 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $76.62 WATER USE 153570 J2 PRINTING SERVICES $646.50 PRINTING 153571 JAMISON ENGINEERING $12,898.28 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 153572 JANDEL SCIENTIFIC $173.55 SOFTWARE 163573 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $801.53 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 153574 JAYS CATERING $86.40 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE 153575 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO. $309.40 GAUGE FUNDING 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 0WS/98 PAGE4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 08/07/96 POSTING DATE 08/07/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 153576 JONES B ATTWOOD/WASTE TECH $1.000.00 FREIGHT FOR FSM MACHINE FOR TESTING 153577 KMI INDUSTRIES $164.78 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 153578 FRANCES L.KALUZNY $850.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 153579 KEMIRON PACIFIC,INC. $50.078.84 FERRIC CHLORIDE NO 9-27-95 153580 KERRY CONSULTING GROUP $7.375.11 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MO 11-16.95 153581 KEWAUNEE SCIENTIFIC CORP. $113.24 WORKBENCH 153582 KING BEARING,INC. $1,749.77 MACHINE SUPPLIES 153583 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES 55,061.15 TOOLS 153554 KOPYKAT $85.20 MEDICAL RECORDS 153565 LSI NORTH AMERICAN SERVICE $297.00 INSTRUMENT REPAIR 153586 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $1.850.62 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICE 153587 LAIDLAW ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES $13,034.03 HAZARDOUS MATERIAL DISPOSAL 163688 LAW/CRANDAL,INC. $4,955.00 SOIL TESTING 7-13-94 153589 ORANGE COUNTY DIVISION $500.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES 153590 LOCALAGENCY $950.00 ANNEXATION FEE 153591 LYLE SCREENPRINTING $914.31 PICNIC SHIRTS 153592 MPS $101.78 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 153593 MACOMCO $928.20 SERVICE AGREEMENT 153594 MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY CORP. $544.87 WELDING SUPPLIES 153595 MANHOLE ADJUSTING $5,625.00 ADJUST MANHOLE FRAMES 8 COVERS 153596 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION INC $1,392.293.00 CONSTRUCTION P1-36-2 153597 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION INC $245.949.84 CONSTRUCTION P141 153598 MARTIN B SHIRLEY BURNS $75.00 PERMIT REFUND 153599 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $176.18 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 163600 MC AFEE ASSOCIATES $10,265.26 SOFTWARE LICENSE 153601 MCBAIN INSTRUMENTS $660.00 LAB SUPPLIES 153M DONALD F.MCINTYRE $1,000.97 EXPENSE REIMB. 153603 MC JUNKIN CORP $5,853.28 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 1530D4 MELLON TRUST $16.461.87 COP TRUST SERVICES 153605 MESA MUFFLER $257.79 TRUCK PARTS 153605 METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT $696.00 MEMBERSHIP 153007 METTLER TOLEDO,INC. $3.323.23 SCALE REPAIR 153606 MICROFLEX MEDICAL CORP $1011.00 SAFETY SUPPLIES 153609 MIDWAY MFG.8 MACHINING $9,083.23 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 153610 MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES CO $300.06 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 153611 MISSION ABRASIVE SUPPLIES $130.11 SAFETY GLASS 153612 MISSION INDUSTRIES $2.974.87 UNIFORM RENTALS 153813 ISIAH MITCHELL $145.41 EXPENSE REIMB. 153614 MONITOR LABS $77.68 INSTRUMENT 153515 MORELAND B ASSOCIATES $5.125.00 AUDITING SERVICES MO 34e95 153616 MOTOROLA,INC. $13,201.53 INSTRUMENT PARTS 153617 NASCO $501.43 VALVE 153618 NAT WEST MARKETS $750.00 COP INTEREST DRAW FEES 153619 STANDARD REF.MATL PROGRAM $1,912.00 LAB SUPPLIES 153620 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES $8.742.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 163621 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $102,27 SAFETY FILM RENTALS E. FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE O8/05196 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID O8107/86 POSTING DATE O8/07/98 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 153622 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $725.58 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 153623 NEW HERMES INC $10,368.75 ENGRAVER 153624 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $45.64 WATER USE 153625 NICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY $4,877.65 LUBRICANTS/DIESEL FUEL 153M NORTH HILLS COIN-OP LAUNDRY $142.70 PERMIT REFUND 153627 OC-ASTD $365.00 MEMBERSHIP 153628 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $8.273.73 OFFICE SUPPLIES 153629 OMNI WESTERN INC $63.03 TOOLS 153630 ORANGE COUNTY FARM SUPPLY $931.46 CHEMICALS 153531 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $334.63 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES ISM32 ORANGE VALVE 5 FITTING CO. $2,027.78 FITTINGS 163633 ORITEX CORP $1,535.35 MECHANICAL PARTS 153634 OXYGEN SERVICE $2,252.31 SPECIALTY GASES IW635 COUNTY OF ORANGE $1,050.00 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE 1536M COUNTY OF ORANGE $751.15 OVERAPPORTIONMENT REFUND 153631 ORANGE COUNTY FORUM $25.00 MANAGEMENT LUNCHEON 153638 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT $37,789.40 GAP WATER USE M.O.S.9-93 153639 PBD CONSULTANTS INC $892.04 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 153640 PSI $75.43 HARDWARE 153541 PSOC(POOL SUPPLY OF OC) $452.45 OPERATING SUPPLIES 153642 PSSI $11,522.00 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION 153643 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $851.18 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 153644 PACIFIC BELL $1.304.76 TELEPHONE SERVICES 153645 PADRE JANITORIAL SUPPLY $2,958.52 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 153645 PARKER HANNIFIN CORP. $475.03 MECHANICAL PARTS 153647 PARKHOUSE TIRE,INC. $1,568.84 TIRES 153649 PARTS UNLIMITED $945.92 TRUCK PARTS 153649 PATRIOT VIDEO PRODUCTIONS $519.00 VIDEO TAPING SERVICE 153680 PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION $28,587.16 LAB SUPPLIES 153651 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $531.51 REIMS.PETTY CASH 153652 PIMA ORO SYSTEMS,INC. $102,335.40 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.3-29-95 153653 POLYPURE,INC. $14,624.75 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92 153854 POWER DESIGN $943.89 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS 153655 POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO. $397.38 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 153656 POWER SYSTEMS $570.40 MAINTENANCE 153657 PRENTICE HALL $37.97 PUBLICATION 153658 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $335.00 ICE FOR SAMPLES ISM59 PULSAFEEDER $499.79 PUMP PARTS 153660 OUICKSTART TECHNOLOGIES $1,050.00 CONSULTING SERVICES 153681 RJN GROUP,INC. $9,000.00 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 163662 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $593.10 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS 153663 R 8 R INSTRUMENTS $671.14 ELECTRIC PARTS 153684 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $2,002.72 TRASH REMOVAL 153665 REBIS $5.000.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 153666 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DIST $70.27 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 153667 THE REGISTER $844.68 NOTICES 8 ADS FUNDING 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 08/05/96 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CI-AIMS PAID 08/07I98 POSTING DATE O8/07/98 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 153668 ROSEN'S ELECTRIC $646.50 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 153669 SKC WEST $101.31 SAFETY SUPPLIES 153670 SPSS,INC $862.00 SOFTWARE 153671 SANCON ENGINEERING,INC. $750.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES ISM72 SARBS-CWEA-PDC, INC. $500.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 153673 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTL $325,422.33 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.64894 ISM74 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $636.80 SPECIALTY GASES 153575 SEA COAST DESIGNS $12.93 LAS SUPPLIES 153676 SEAWATERVISIONS $603.40 COOLER 153677 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $4.115.03 TOOLS 153678 SHASTA ELECTRIC $287,344.00 CONSTRUCTION J-31-2 153679 SHORE PERSONNEL SERVICES $10,000.00 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 153680 SHURELUCK SALES $8.296.65 TOOLS/HARDWARE 153681 SIEVERS INSTRUMENTS INC. $1,800.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 153682 SKILL PATH SEMINARS $99.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 153683 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $290.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 153684 SMITH-EMERY CO. $1,934.00 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-13-94 153685 SMITH PIPE&SUPPLY $736.65 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 153686 SO CALIF EDISON CO $50,936.74 POWER 153687 SO.CAL GAS.CO. $2,239.41 NATURAL GAS 153688 SOUTHERN CALIF GAS COMPANY $15.450.00 CONSTRUCTION P7-51 153689 SOUTHERN CALIF TRANE SERVICE $10,059.00 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 153690 SPARLING INSTRUMENT CO.,INC. $115.10 METER 153691 SPEX CERTIPREP INC. $88.78 LAB SUPPLIES 153692 STANDARD BUFF&EQUIP CO $305.80 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 153693 STATE CHEMICAL MANUFACTURING $1,290.32 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 153694 STERLING ART $238.78 ART SUPPLIES 153895 SUMMIT STEEL $110.34 METAL 153696 SUNSETFORD $126.37 TRUCK PARTS 153697 SUPELCO,INC. $639.69 LAB SUPPLIES 153698 SUPER CHEM CORP. $2.009.65 CHEMICALS 153699 SYMCAS $1.475.00 CONSULTING SERVICES 163700 SYSCOM INC $2.036.54 HUMAN RESOURCES TRAINING 153701 MAHIN TALESI $565.82 EXPENSE REIMB. 163702 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $377.91 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 153703 TEXAS ANALYTICAL CONTROLS $804.06 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS 153704 THEODORE ROBBINS FORD $248.96 VEHICAL RENTAL 153705 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $2.822.94 MECHANICAL PARTS 153706 TIME WARNER COMMUNICATIONS $41.28 CABLE SERVICES 153707 TONY'S LOCK&SAFE SERVICE $292.96 LOCKS&KEYS 153708 EDWARD M.TORRES $223.92 EXPENSE REIMB. 153709 TOSHIBA INTERNATIONAL $1.203.62 INSTRUMENT PARTS 153710 TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY,INC. $16,742.68 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.0.5-11-94 153711 TRUESDAIL LABS $6.188.00 LAB SERVICES 153712 JG TUCKER&SON,INC. $143.94 INSTRUMENT PARTS 153713 US POSTAL SERVICE $5,000.00 POSTAGE FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 08/05/96 PAGE 7 + REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMSPAID08107195 POSTING DATE O807/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 153714 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $396.00 LAB SUPPLIES 153715 UNISOURCEB/OR BUTLER PAPER $403.67 OFFICE SUPPLIES 153716 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $639.10 PARCEL SERVICES 153717 VWR SCIENTIFIC $4.602.87 LAB SUPPLIES 153718 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $351.66 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 153719 VERNE'S PLUMBING $205.00 PLUMBING SERVICES 153720 VERTEX SYSTEMS $2.363.01 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT 153721 WACKENHUT CORP. $11,867.32 CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS 153722 WAL-CON CONSTRUCTION CO. $7,141.12 CONSTRUCTION 153723 CARL WARREN 8 CO. $4,051.53 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR 153724 WASTE MARKETS $12,226.03 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 3.27-96 163725 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $17,774,50 CAUSTIC SODA MO 8-23-95 153726 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $1,959.80 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE MO 4-24-96 153727 WESTERN WHOLSALE CO $85.91 TRUCK SUPPLIES 153728 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $732.42 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 153729 WESCO DISTRIBUTION INC. $1,595.78 INSTRUMENT PARTS 153730 CHARLES F.WINSOR $515.00 EXPENSE REIMS. 153731 WITEG $765.03 LAB SUPPLIES 153732 ROURKE,WOODRUFF B SPRADLIN $47,705.33 LEGAL SERVICES MO 7.26-95 153733 WORDPERFECT $55.94 SUBSCRIPTIONS 153734 XEROX CORP. $23.328.91 COPIER LEASES 153735 ZYMARK CORP. $1.513.50 LAB EQUIPMENT TOTAL CLAIMS PAID ORM7196 $3.877,540.35 FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 08/05/96 PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 081071% POSTING DATE O8/07M SUMMARY AMOUNT M1 OPER FUND $60.00 A7 CONST FUND ($998.30) 92 OPER FUND $4,970.20 02 CAP FAC FUND $892.04 A2 CONST FUND ($5,362.93) $3 OPER FUND $32,626.13 $3 CAP FAC FUND $64.582.59 $3 CONST FUND $12,825.96 $5 OPER FUND $4,857.72 $5 CONST FUND ($1,450.11) $6 CAP FAC FUND $200.00 $6 CONST FUND ($646.33) $7 OPER FUND $31.363.77 $7 CAP FAC FUND $6,867.00 $7 CONST FUND ($1,726.05) #11 OPER FUND $353.21 #11 CAP FAC FUND $260.00 pit CONST FUND ($1,160.64) R13 CONST FUND $2.55 S14 OPER FUND $32.13 $14 CONST FUND $15.00 0&11 OPER FUND $1,875.00 M5&6 OPER FUND $3.186.08 S5&6 CAP FAC FUND $991.34 W6&7 OPER FUND 52,202.90 S7&14 OPER FUND $7,294.62 JT OPER FUND $1,040,405.05 CORF $2,301.318.40 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $133.819.66 .IT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $237,881.45 $3,877,540.35 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE-VARIOUS PAGE 1 ` REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID-MISCELLANEOUS HANDWRITE WARRANTS WARRANT DATE WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 0822/96 153994 CALL AMERICA INC $90AD CELLULAR PHONE REIMB. 0822196 153995 DOUGLAS STEWART $635.00 EXPENSE REIMB. 0827/96 154014 TRISTATE SEMINAR $270.00 REGISTRATION 0827/96 154015 WEFTEC'95 $940.00 REGISTRATION 0828/96 154016 KNOTTS BERRY FARM $1,503.50 DISCOUNTTICKETS O8I3028 164236 TRISTATE SEMINAR ON-THE-RMER $210.00 REGISTRATION 09105M 154237 THE BALBOA BAY CLUB $3,314.70 NEWPORT SPILL-ANDERSON 09/05/96 154238 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE $6,798.61 MEDICARE ADJUSTMENT 09/05/96 154239 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $19,591.26 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP 09105M 154240 R.CRAIG SCOTT 8 ASSOC. $7,000.00 EXPERT WITNESS RETAINER FEE TOTAL CLAIMS PAID $40,353.17 SUMMARY AMOUNT #1 OPER FUND $892.78 #2 OPER FUND $2,167.40 #3 OPER FUND $1,993.35 #5 OPER FUND $265.83 #6 OPER FUND $278.74 #7 OPER FUND $624.11 #11 OPER FUND $516.69 #13 OPER FUND $73.43 #14 OPER FUND $186.28 JT OPER FUND $2,618.50 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $29,905.96 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $1,030.10 $40.353.17 F,xIa.Sao.UwOo" AGENDA O COMA.INFO.nEM D ❑ COMA,.ACTION ITEM ITEM a J° jr.BmcoNsENT TRANSMITTAL ❑ Jr.BDS.DISCUSSION (NONC NSENT) ❑ PUBUC NEARING Jr.8DS.MEETING DATE Jr.BDS.AGENDA ITEM W. MEETING DATE COMM.ID.NO. DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION 12JR—(InNals of Originator) OMITS: OMITS PDC: PDC FAHR: FAHR 5 Div.3720,Joe RymaIe,Ext.5057 EXEC: EXEC STEER: STEER Division No.,Name,and Extern ion JT.BDS:9/25M AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Agenda Wording: CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION ORDERING ANNEXATION NO. 9 -CRYSTAL COVE STATE PARK, a State of California Department of Parks and Recreation twenty acre site, known as the"Historical District, located on Pacific Coast Highway north of the intersection with Sand Canyon Avenue. Recommended Action(s): Adopt Resolution ordering Annexation No. 9 to County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County. CEQA REVIEW: Project is Exempt: YES DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM: Date Notice of Exemption FIIW 7rM 6/28195 BUDGET INFORMATION CURRENTYEAR CURRENT YEAR. YEAR-TO43ATE REVISED BUDGET TOTAL BUDGETED AMT, NIA BUDGETAMOUNT T04DATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL EXPENDITURES ITomi amy cM.Tm .ol N/A N/A N/A NIA AIT/PROJECT COST INFORMATION ORIGINAL BID, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED PROJECT PO,CONTRACT FUNDS PREY. REQUESTED THIS AMOUNT AMOUNT APPROVED An N/A N/A N/A N/A WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? NO If VES,zMre number: _Permanent Limitetl Term H YES,explain in ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section CONCURRENCES: ATTACHMENTS TO AGENDA (List) q I To Committee: 1. N/A ti I Sig ire Date Div ion M n ( DesignTo A. Ede- 6� p Signature. Date Depart, r esign Signs ure ate Assistant General Manager(Or Designee) OMTS COMM. PDC COMM. FAHR COMM. JOINT BOARDS Meetlng Date: Approved: Amended: Forwarded to: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION(Background and/or Summary) In August 1993, the Directors approved a license and reimbursement agreement with Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) and the State of California Department of Parks and Recreation (State)for construction, reimbursement and ownership of sewer facilities to serve the Crystal Cove State Park. These facilities are built with the exception of the future local sewer facilities in and around the"historical district" of Crystal Cove State Park. County Sanitation District No. 5 (CSD 5) has never annexed the 20 acres which surround the "historical district'and includes the old cottages right on the beach. This annexation is in accordance with a 1984 property tax agreement with the County of Orange. IRWD is the local sewering agency. To provide sewer service to this portion of the State Park, it is necessary for the State to request and pay for the annexation of these 20 acres to District No. 5. On June 26, 1995, the Directors approved an annexation agreement with the State which provided for both annexation fees and connection fees for the District to annex the above referenced 20 acres and allow the State to connect all future anticipated local sewerage system improvements into the Districts collection system. A total of$194,468.00 was paid to CSD 5 by the State on January 12, 1996 in accordance with the 1995 annexation agreement. The Orange County Loral Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) has approved the annexation petition and staff recommends that the Directors approve and order the annexation. RJR:jmf/dl c: Department Head AGM-Administration AGM-Operations General Manager J:%WPDOCWGENDAWRs-9MEPIANNEx 09 AGENDA ITEM TRANSMITTAL mm MEETING DATE DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION P-,)A (InNele of Odgin d,x) OMTS: PDC: FAHR: Div.3720, Joe Rycraw,Ext.5057 EXEC: -..e,. 5LL 7 STEER: JT.BDS:9/25/96 ( Division No..Name,and Extension AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTTON(S): Agenda Wording: CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION ORDERING ANNEXATION NO. 151 GOODMAN ANNEXATION, consisting of 1.01 acres of unincorporated county territory, to the Districts, in the vicinity south of the intersection of Lower Lake Drive and Lake Court. (Annexation No. 151 - Goodman Annexation) Recommended Action(s): This annexation is in accordance with the terms of the negotiated agreement with the County of Orange re:A.B.8 tax exchange for annexing properties under which the District no longer receives a percentage of the basic levy and instead collects a higher annexation fee. Staff recommends approval of this resolution. The City of Orange is the local sewering agency. CEOA REVIEW: Project Is Exempt: YES DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM: Dale Notice of Emmietlon Flied:74M Negative Declaration Approved on Final EIR Approved on_and Nolloe of Detemilration glad on_ Apol 24, 1996 FUNDS BUDGETED: Total: N/A CURRENTYEAR CURRENTYEAR-TO- YEAR-TOZATE TOTAL REVISED SOURCE: CORF JO DISTRICTS BUDGETAMOUNT DATE EXPENDITURES BUDGET BALANCE PROJECT COST Sehedule/Uns Rom:WA AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: N/A N/A N/A N/A ScheduWUns Item:WA WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO CONSISTENT WITH BOARD POLICY? YES 1(YES,state number _Permanent Umhed Term CONCURRENCES: ATTACHMENTS TO AGENDA(Uel) Igrmlu e ` // Date DMelon t (0/ ealgne V To Commit". 1. N/A [=`5 d— nelum pa e DeparWrlen a r eaig e) To A.Bds.: ��•— /o it 96 Sigiiatta. Date Assistant General Manager(Or Designee) J:%W PDOCWGENDAWITSMZEP14NNEX.151 T - OMTS COMM POC COMM. FAtar COMM. JOW80AROS Mc no Appm Ammltlgd _ i ADDITIONAL INFORMATION(Background anWw Summary) January 5, 1996 the District received a request from Lawrence and Sharlene Goodman, occupants of a single- family residence located at 20682 Santiago Canyon Road, to annex their 1.01 acre parcel into the District 7. The Goodman's were experiencing a serious problem with their septic system. The annexation is in accordance with the term of the negotiated agreement with the County of Orange re AB 8 Tax Exchange for annexing properties under which the District no longer receives a percentage of the basic levy and, instead collects a higher annexation fee. This includes our annexation acreage fee of$3,943.04, the recovery of cost for Local Agency Formation Commission Processing Fee ($950), State Board of Equalization Processing Fee ($250), District Processing Fee ($500), and California Environmental Quality Act Filing Fee ($25). The total annexation fee is $5,668.04. The local sewering agency is the City of Orange. c: Department Head AGM-Administration AGM-Operations General Manager J:=PD0CWGENDAV ITS-9SISEPKNNEx.1 Si Page 2 of 2 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING SEPTEMBER 25, 1996 District No. 13 Agenda Item (11 ): Consideration of motion approving a new negotiated Consent Decree re U. S. Government v. Montrose Chemical Corp., et al., at no cost to the Districts. Summary Please see General Counsel's attached memorandum dated August 9, 1996. This item was carried over for District No. 13 only from the August 26, 1996 meeting due to a lack of quorum. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Boards of Directors approve the new negotiated Consent Decree. J:\wPDOC%B51AG96141 EP%W.1 1 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California Y P.O. Box 8127 • 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE Wednesday, August 28, 1996- 5:30 p.m. A meeting of the Steering Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held Wednesday, August 28, 1996, at 5:30 p.m., at the Districts' Administrative office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: STEERING COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT: Present: STAFF PRESENT: John J. Collins, Joint Chair Blake P. Anderson, Assistant General Manager Peer A. Swan, Vice Joint Chair Judith A. Wilson, Assistant General Manager George Brown, Chair, FAHR Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary Pat McGuigan, Chair, OMTS Sheldon Singer, Chair, PDC Absent: John C. Cox, Jr., Past Joint Chair Roger Stanton, Vice Chair, FAHR (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. (4) APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the July 24, 1996 Steering Committee meeting were approved as drafted. Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting Y Page 2 August 28, 1996 (5) REPORTS OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR GENERAL MANAGER AND GENERAL COUNSEL (a) The Committee Chairman announced that while the agenda is short for the Joint Board meeting tonight, it could be a long meeting because of the closed session items. It was moved, seconded and passed to add to discussion items under Agenda Item (6); (d) a discussion of the agreement with the Orange County Water District for GAP water, and (e) the Silverado Construction Company dewatering issue. (b) There was no report by the General Manager because he was on vacation. (c) There was no report by Counsel- (6) DISCUSSION ITEMS (a) Orange County Reclamation Protect. Blake Anderson gave the members of the Steering Committee an update on the status of the project as well as some background information because the Districts has received an unsolicited proposal from Wheelabrator-Carollo (W-C) on this project which could prove to be very advantageous to the Districts, as well as moving the reclamation project towards completion. It appears that the major stumbling blocks for the project in the eyes of the Orange County Water District are funding and rate impacts. Blake described the activities that are underway, including several research studies. The W-C proposal, a"what-if" proposal, would provide the finance, design, construction, operation and maintenance of the 100 mgd reclamation project through a private contract with a prenegotiated rate of return, open books, and a fast-track construction project. Any reclamation project could significantly reduce the amount of water going through the outfall, resulting in large savings, and would change the recommendations in the Strategic Plan. With a start date of 1997, the project could be on line by 1999-2000. This project has been discussed with Bill Mills, and W-C will be making a presentation to OCWD staff on September 9. The Committee members indicated that if the project pencils out, they will continue to listen. The largest issue at this time is whether this project could be sole- sourced. Staff has requested an opinion from General Counsel. Staff will keep the Steering Committee updated on this very interesting project proposal. Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting Page 3 August 28, 1996 (b) Update on Labor Negotiations. Judy Wilson reported that negotiations are underway with Local 501. The first meeting is scheduled for September 4. A proposal has also been received from the Professional and Supervisory Group. They are requesting that their negotiations also begin at this time. Judy also discussed the role of the labor negotiators that the Districts have hired. (c) September Working Committee Agenda Items. The items being presented to the Committees in September were discussed. There are two items relating to the Boise Chica sewer replacement, a contract for the design and a reimbursement agreement. New issues have surfaced which could cause some delay. Among those are the need for the state to get capital authorization to proceed. Blake also mentioned that the Surfriders have asked for an update on the status of this project. If the state is having problems getting authorization, the Surfriders may be willing to assist in a PR campaign. Chair Collins expressed his concern that we will still be blamed for this problem. The public will perceive the Districts as being at fault and that's why we're fixing the sewer for the state, or that the Districts has so much money we ran afford to fix the slate's problem. He stated that we need to improve the public relations. He is also concerned that the state has never publicly stated that they are at fault as well as acknowledging that we have offered to help. Directors Brown and Swan suggested that the only way to get people's attention is to close the beach by going to the Orange County Health Department and expressing our concern. However, the only way the OC Health Department can close the beach is if the bacterial numbers are not being met. (d) Negotiations with OCWD for GAP Water. Staff is seeking authorization to re- negotiate the purchase of GAP water from the Orange County Water District. The issues to be discussed include the pricing, tern of the agreement and interruptibility of service. (a) Dewatering Problems re East Foothill Transportation Corridor. Silverado Construction is the contractor on this project which has encountered very high groundwater at an under crossing and has asked for our help in solving this problem, which is located in District 14 and in IRWD's service area. There are two issues. The first is dewatering during construction (about 2.2 mgd) and the second is dewater after construction (about 500,000 gpd). At the time the project was designed, it was thought that the water could be discharged to Peters Canyon Wash, however, the nitrate concentrations are too high. The present thinking is that IRWD will charge for conveying the water to our Main Street Pump Station and then we would back out the 2.2 mgd coming from District 14 and we would then charge the normal O&M costs and annual capital costs for the two years of construction dewatering. Director Swan indicated that there is a possibility of discharging to a desalter in the Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting Page 4 August 28, 1996 future, and that would eliminate some of the problems. Al this time the plan is to present the agreement to the October committees and the Boards. Judy mentioned that there is also a need for an agreement with the Transportation Corridor Agency and Cal-Trans and that there will be wording that makes the agreement transferrable in the future. This is an example of the types of issues the newly formed Rate Advisory Committee will be addressing in coming months. (7) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session- (8) OTHER BUSINESS There was no other business discussed. (9) MATTERS TO BE REPORTED AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING Director Swan suggested that a status report be made to the OMTS Committee on how the plant is operating, indicating any problems and fixes. (10) MATTERS ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT No matters were identified. (11) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS Director McGuigan announced that because there was only one item scheduled for the OMTS Committee in September, she would be announcing at the Joint Boards Meeting that-the September 4, 1996 OMTS Committee meeting will be canceled. The next meeting of the Steering Committee has been scheduled for September 25, 1996 at 5:30 p.m. i Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting Page 5 August 28, 1996 (12) ADJOURNMENT The Steering Committee adjourned at approximately 7:05 p.m. ubmitted by: n Tappan, SteA04 Committee Secretary �-COMM1f8N�.MIM County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California P.O.Box 8127 • 108"Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714) 962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF THE PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MEETING Thursday, September S. 1996, at 6:00 p.m. A meeting of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on September 5, 1996, at 6:00 p.m., at the Districts' Administrative Office. Prior to the beginning of the meeting, there was a brief tour of the Headworks and the new GSA(Information Technology) office trailer complex. ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: Present: Staff Present: Sheldon Singer, Chair David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Walter K Bowman Bob Ooten, Director of Operations & Maintenance John Collins, Joint Chair Doug Stewart, Engineering Manager Shirley Dettloff Tom Dawes, Planning Manager Don Griffin Chris Cervellone, Engineering Supervisor Barry Hammond, Vice Chair Margie Rice Others Present: Peer Swan Charles Sylvia Lee Badenscher, Lee & Ro Daniel Welch Kellene Bum-Lucht, Camp, Dresser& McKee Duane Jensen, Carollo Engineers Absent Bill Knopf, Cardillo Engineers Gail Lynch, Carollo Engineers Bob Zemel Jeff McDonnell, Pascal & Ludwig APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. PUBLIC COMMENTS No comments were made. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the August 1, 1996 Planning, Design, and Construction Committee meeting were approved as drafted. r Minutes of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee Page 2 September 5, 1996 REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Chair had no report. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager had no report. REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER-ADMINISTRATION The Assistant General Manager of Administration had no report. REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER-OPERATIONS The Assistant General Manager of Operations had no report. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING The Director of Engineering gave an update on Project P1-36-2. REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel had no report. DISCUSSION ITEMS (Nos. 1-10) Please Note:Although the following items were acted upon in another sequence, the minutes herein list them in the original numerical order for tracking purposes. 1. PDC96-48: CAROLLO ENGINEERS WILL PRESENT THE COMMITTEE WITH A REPORT ON THE STATE OF THE INVESTIGATION AND REPAIR OF THE OCEAN OUTFALL, JOB NO. J-39, (All Districts): The report will be given by Gail Lynch and Duane Jensen. Information Item only. More details will be presented at the September 21, 1996 workshop. 2. PDC96-41: MONTHLY REPORT ON CHANGE ORDERS, (All Districts): The Director of Engineering will review the Monthly Change Order Report form dated September 5, 1996. Information Item only. Action on change orders that require PDC Committee or Boards' approval will be taken separately. Four change orders this month. Minutes of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee Page 3 September 5, 1996 3. PDC96-42: APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 4 TO CONTRACT P1-36-2 WITH MARGATE CONSTRUCTION, INC. FOR SECONDARY TREATMENT IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 1, (All Districts): The Construction Manager and Director of Engineering request approval of Change Order No. 4 providing seven items of additional work and four credit items. RECOMMENDED ACTION: PDC Committee recommends approval of Change Order No.4 to Contract No. 1511-36-2 with Margate Construction, Inc. for an addition of$24,733.00, increasing the total contract amount to$34,918,007.00. 4. PDC96-43: APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 9 TO CONTRACT NOS. P1-36-1, P1-38-1, P1-38-4, J-17-2, AND P2-43-3 WITH ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS FOR MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 1 AND PLANT NO. 2, (All Districts): The Construction Manager and Director of Engineering request approval of Change Order No. 9 for six items of additional work and one credit item. MOTION: PDC Committee approves Change Order No. 9 to Contract Nos. P1-36.1, P1-38-1, P1-38.4, J-17.2, and P2-43-3 with Advanco Constructors for an addition of$27,265.00, increasing the total contract amount to $ 6,287,866.00. 5. PDC96-44: APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NOS. 2 AND 3 TO CONTRACT 3-36R WITH ALBERT W. DAVIES, INC.; AND ACCEPT THE CONTRACT AS COMPLETE AND AUTHORIZE EXECUTION OF THE NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT, (District No. 3): The Construction Manager and Director of Engineering request approval of Change Order No. 2 providing six items of additional work and Change Order No. 3, Adjustment of Engineer's Quantities and Final Closeout Agreement of the Westminster Avenue Force Main (First Unit) and new Westside Pump Station Force Main. RECOMMENDED ACTION: PDC Committee recommends approval of Change Order No. 2 to Contract No. 3-36R with Albert W. Davies, Inc. for an addition of $31,301,55, approval of Change Order No. 3, Adjustment of Engineers quantities for a deduction of$42,216.00, increasing the total contract amount to $3,823,756.55, and approval of final Closeout Agreement, 6. PDC96-45: AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED WITH PHASE II AND III OF THE STRATEGIC PLAN INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (All Districts): The Engineering Department requests authority to proceed with the remaining work on the Strategic Plan including authority to negotiate Addendum No. 1 to PSA with Camp Dresser& McKee for Phase 11, Treatment, Reuse and Disposal Facilities, and Request for Proposals and negotiate a Professional Services Agreement for Preparation of Programmatic Environmental Impact Report, Phase III. RECOMMENDED ACTION: PDC Committee recommends proceeding with implementation of the Strategic Plan and soliciting proposals from qualified firms for both Phase 11 and Phase III. Minutes of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee Page 4 September 5, 1996 7. PDC9646: JOB NO. J-43, REHABILITATION OF BOLSA CHICA STATE BEACH SEWERAGE SYSTEM, (All Districts): The Director of Engineering in conjunction with the Director of Technical Services requests the Purchasing Manager to issue a purchase order to Camp Dresser& McKee, Inc. for a professional services agreement for a total amount not to exceed $321,260.00 for design and construction management services to repair and/or rehabilitate the State of California gravity sewers, lift stations and force mains which appear to be leaking sewage into and through the sand at Boise Chica State Beach. A separate reimbursement contract between the Districts and the State of California is under active discussion, and will be the subject of the FAHR Committee Meeting of September 11, 1996. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Remove from consideration and action due to lack of acceptable reimbursement agreement with the State of California. 8. PDC96-37: AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO MODIFICATIONS TO ELECTRICAL AND CONTROL SYSTEMS AND PROCESS EVALUATIONS AT PLANT NO. 1,JOB NO. P1-40-1, AND MODIFICATIONS TO ELECTRICAL AND CONTROL SYSTEMS AND PROCESS EVALUATIONS AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-47-1 (All Districts): The Engineering Department and the Director of Engineering requests that the Professional Services Agreement with Lee & Ro Consulting Engineers , Inc. be amended providing for additional engineering services for design changes at an increase of$76,801.00. RECOMMENDED ACTION: PDC Committee recommends approval of Amendment No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with Lee & Ro Consulting Engineers, Inc., increasing the contract amount to $1,247,967.00. 9. PDC96-47: JOB NO. P2-58 WITH GIERLICH-MITCHELL, INC. FOR REHABILITATION OF GRIT AUGER AT PLANT NO. 2, (All Districts): The Engineering Department requests that Contracts/Purchasing Manager be authorized to issue a purchase order for rehabilitation of grit auger at Plant No. 2 at a cost of$63,680. RECOMMENDED ACTION: PDC Committee recommends approval to authorize issuing a Purchase Order for Job No. P2-58, Rehabilitation of Grit Auger at Plant No. 2, to Gieriich-Mitchell for design services, manufacturing services and installation services of equipment for a total cost of$63,680. 10. PDC9649: JOB NO. P1-40-2 (REBID), FACILITY MODIFICATIONS AND SAFETY UPGRADES AT PLANT NO. 1, AND JOB NO. P247-2 (REBID), FACILITY MODIFICATIONS AND SAFETY UPGRADES AT PLANT NO. 2, (All Districts): Receive and file letter dated August 21, 1996, from Margate Construction, Inc., protesting the apparent low bid of Pascal & Ludwig Engineers. RECOMMENDED ACTION: PDC Committee recommends that this matter be referred to the Executive Committee for further discussions prior to action by the Boards of Directors. Minutes of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee Page 5 September 5, 1996 CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS, OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There was no other business discussed. MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Planning, Design, and Construction Committee meeting is scheduled for October 3, 1996. ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 8:30 p.m. Submitted by: Gail cai� Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Secretary :go .uawooxvorasysew.+wu�s wvo AGENDA ❑ G o.lTe I s ITEM �' Q"CIXRn.AGTtGN❑EV ' n E°s G°" `"r TRANSMITTAL awn.ecs.csuvss�+t b m (�++ooruENB _ ❑p PthNJG PFlRING 7����JT.BGS.AG_'L'(iVG GATE T eos.AGENCAITPA ra. MEETING DATE COMM.ID.N0. DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION (I ftialsof Originator) OMTS: �Ts PDC:9-6-96 PDC FAHR: FAHR EXEC EXEC: STEER all 3720,Jack Vincent,ext 5050 STEER: Division No.,Name,and Extension Jr.eDs:�j�.g AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Agenda Wording: JOB NO. Pi WITH GIERLICH-MITCHELL, INC. FOR REHABILITATION OF GRIT AUGER AT PLANT 2, All Districts: The Engineering Department requests that Contracts/Purchasing Manager be authorized to issue a purchase order for rehabilitation of grit auger at Plant 2 at a cost of$63,680. Recommended Actions): 1. Authorize issuing a Purchase Order for Job No. P2-58, Rehabilitation of Grit Auger at Plant 2, to Giedich- Mitchell for design services, manufacturing services and installation services of equipment for a total cost of $63,680. CEOAREVIEW: Project is Exempt: No MOSTRECENTBOARD ACTIONON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM: Date Notice of Exemption Filed: Negative Declaration Approved on Final EIR Approved on_and Notice of Determination filed on July 19M nom FUNDS BUDGETED: Total: $99.565 CURRENT YEAR CURRENT YEAR-TO- YEAR-TO43ATE TOTAL REVISED SOURCE: CORE BUDGET AMOUNT DATE EXPENDITURES BUDGET BALANCE PROJECT COST Section 8,Page 5, Item: B.7.d, AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: SchedulelUne Item: $99,565 $0.00 $99,565 $99,565 WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO CONSISTENT WITH BOARD POLICY? YES If YES,staenumher. _Permanent Limded Term CONCURRENCES: // 1 �I/ // ATTACHMENTS TO AGENDA(List) ,�L"l/ C1J P11 �L '4' 1 Zz 'u' Sign re ads Divi Mani(Or Deal Tree) To Committee: S' natu I Dew pa M e rDe ) To JL BOs.: gne re Dew Assistant General Manager(Or DWgrw) r Additional Information(Background and/or Summary) The existing grit auger system was put in service approximately 30 years ago and has become inefficient and a severe maintenance problem. Repairs are frequent and costly, the grit augers are out of service at the same time for repairs, grit is carried over into the digesters which increases digester maintenance. It appears that the latest technology in grit transfer systems will greatly reduce our high maintenance cost. The most promising system investigated by Districts' staff is the Polychem Non-Metallic Grit System. This system will fit into the existing grit auger troughs and uses plastic chain like that specified for our clarifier mechanisms. Comments from other users have been favorable. There are three grit augers at Plant No. 2 and two at Plant No. 1 which have similar problems and for which major maintenance has been delayed due to the expectation that a better system will be installed. Before purchasing new systems, the Districts Staff want to test the newer technology at the Plant 2 grit and facility configuration. After testing the equipment, the Districts will prepare a detailed specifications for bidding a replacement of all the remaining grit augers. This procurement is a sole source because the product has unique features and apparent qualities not found on other equipment. The proposed trial provides a means of testing the equipment and gathering data for future procurement specifications. The total cost of the proposed system is $63,680.00. Payment will be made in two installments. The first installment will be 50% of the installation cost and 50% of the equipment cost and will be due and payable upon start-up of the new equipment. The second installment, which is the balance of the purchase price, will be due and payable after nine months of successful operation. JAV:Imf/dl c: Deparlmeni Head AGrhAtlminletraran AGM-0Pe20ons Gemml Manager J:\WPOOC\PDC91MEPl9riO3 Page 2 of 2 Reviabn: 81il BUDGET INFORMATION TASK BUDGET FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED% (ADOPTED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE COMPLETE TO BY CORF) TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZED TO DATE DATE FUNDS VENDOR/ 5,000 0 5,000 5,000 0 0 ENGINEERING EQUIPMENT 43,100 0 43,100 43,100 0 0 CONSTRUCTION 15,580 0 15.580 15,580 0 0 STAFF TIME 32,885 0 32,885 32,885 0 0 RENTAL 3,000 0 3.000 3,000 0 0 TOTAL -99,565 1 0 1 99.565 1 99,565 1 0 1 0 I'I Budget from miscellaneous small projects budget B.7.d. J:\W PDOCIPDC981SEP%603.TBL a µ AGENDA \ ITEM eGar� x er TRANSMITTAL g MEETING DATE DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION (InBUN oI Originator) OMITS' :;., , PDC erwrx 3790,Tod Herres,Eed.5104 n FAHR' DMalon No.,Now,and ENenaion EXEC' XEDSsc y AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTbrNS): Agenda Wording: APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 4 TO CONTRACT P1-36-2 WITH MARGATE CONSTRUCTION, INC. FOR SECONDARY TREATMENT IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 1: The Construction Manager and Director of Engineering request approval of Change Order No. 4 providing seven items of additional work and four credit items. Recommended Action(s): Approve Change Order No. 4 to Contract No. Pt-36-2 with Margate Construction Inc. for an addition of $24,733.00, increasing the total contract amount to $ 34,918,007.00. CEOA REVIEW:Project is Exempt:Not AppMeehle MOST RECENT 130ARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM: 82"6 FUNDS BUDGETED: TOW: $38,016.000 CURRENT YEAR CURRENT YEAR-T0. YEAR-TO-DATE TOTAL REVISED SOURCE: CORF: Item A.3.o,SW.e Page4 BUDGETAMOUNT DATE EXPENDITURES BUDGET BALANCE PROJECT COST $14,500,000 $2,444,396 $12,055,604 $34,918,007. WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO CONSISTENTWTI BOARD POLICY? YES CON CES: o ATTACHMENTSTO AGENDA(List) /1—f-L To CommBes: 1. Change Order No.4 sigfeature Date Mmeger(Or Designee) yb Lo DateTo JI,Bds.: 1. Signed Change Order No.4 e _ (O dgran, Signature , D Assistant General Manager(Or Dealgnse) '-��' Fc a+"' v1bRJ1'"80ARUS Aneided ��� rz - pN1AMrkIslO" y t Page 1 of 2 J 1WPDOCIENGIPI-38.2NIT.WPD ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (Background and/or Summary) n Job No. Pi-36-2, Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1,consists of expanding the secondary treatment capacity at Plant No. 1. The project provides ten new secondary clarifiers, replacement of the existing aeration system, renovation of existing blowers, renovation of three existing dissolved air flotation thickeners,three new dissolved air flotation thickeners,and other improvements. These improvements will Increase the secondary capacity from 46 million gallons per day(mgd)to 80 mgd. The contract also includes a new pump station for the Orange County Water Districts. The plans and specifications were prepared by Carollo Engineers and the construction contract was awarded to Margate Construction,Inc. in June 1995. This contract is approximately 30% complete. Change Order No.4 is an addition in the amount of$24,733.00 to the contract for seven items of additional work and four credit items. There is no time extension for this change order. The following is a summary of the contract: Original Contract Price $ 35,291,000.00 Previously Authorized Changes $ (397,726.00) This Change(Add)(13eddct) $ 24,733.00 Change Orders to Date $ (372,993.00) Percentage Increase/Decrease (1.06)% Amended Contract Price $ 34,918,007.60 Value Engineering Credits $ 271,323.00 The following table summarizes the Change Order. For additional details on individual Hems,see the attached Change Order: ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DAYS TYPE 1 Revise switchgear power bus design. $35,502 0 Design Change 2 Provide transmitters for flowmeters in DAFTs. 10.463 0 Design Change 3 Provide power source to new District furnished control panel. 14,059 0 Omission 4 Relocate a conduit. 5,191 0 Design Change 5 Provide power source to the water heater in the DAFT control 4.525 0 Omission room. 6 Revise clarifier outlet box and provide grating. 2.630 0 Omission 7 Provide a floor drain at DAFT. 997 0 Omission 8 Delete double gasketed joint in concrete pipe. (24,000) 0 Design Change 9 Delete power source to the blower automatic roll fitters. (13,903) 0 Design Change 10 Reroute the drain piping for the new clarifiers. (8,631) 0 Design Change 11 Delete the programming computer for the project 12,100) 0 Design Change TOTAL-Change Order No.4 24,733 0 Items 1 and 3 were due to design errors,the errors were discovered before construction. As a result, the additional cost for these items shown here would have otherwise been addressed In the original contract. Liquidated Damages on this contract are $1,000.00 per day and there are no bonus provisions. TDH:Ih c: Department Head AGM-Administration AGM-Operations General Manager Page 2 of 2 J:IWPDOCIENGIP1-36-2WT WPO Page 1 of 6 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction C.O. No.: Four (4) Date: Sept. 25, 1996 Job: Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. Pt-36-2 Amount of this Change Order(Add)(Bedaet) $24,733.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 - LOAD BREAK SWITCH REVISIONS AT TRANSFORMERS TTt AND TT2 This item revises the load break switches to Transformers TT1 and TT2 shown on Contract Drawing 1 E03 and revises current limiting devices on the Load Interrupting Switchgear specified in Detailed Specification 66-0540. The item also includes additional conduit, wire, and testing necessary for the new equipment. The original load break switch design would incorrectly tie plant 12 KV electrical buses A and B together creating an unsafe condition. Revised short circuit rating parameters require current limiting modifications to provide adequate protection for the transformers. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH P 1362-10) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $35,502.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 2-ADD TRANSMITTERS TO RECYCLE FLOW METERS AT DAF THICKENERS This item is for providing transmitters for three existing recycle flowmeters in Dissolved Air Flotation Thickener(DAFT) Nos. 1, 2, and 3 and adding transmitters to three proposed recycle flowmeters in DAFT Nos. 4, 5, and 6. The work includes conduit and wire modifications to provide the transmitter signals to Control Panel CP-SCP4. The transmitters were requested by the Maintenance Department and will allow remote computer monitoring and recording of recycle flow. The original contract did not require transmitters for the recycle flowmeters. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH P1362-6,6a) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER REM: $10,463.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 2 of 6 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9272MI27 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Margate Construction C.O. No.: Four(4) Date: Sept. 25, 1996 Job: Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1. Job No. Pt-36-2 ITEM 3-TURBINE GENERATOR FUEL OIL PUMP CONTROLS This item is for additional wire, conduit, and modifications to Motor Control Center Q necessary to install a Districts-fumished Turbine Fuel Oil Pump Control Panel CP-TL The new panel replaces controls removed during the demolition of the engine control panels for Blower Nos. 1 and 2 as indicated on Contract Drawing 2E01. This item does not include stainless steel tubing for pneumatic controls which will be accomplished in the future by force account. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section IM(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1362-04) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 14.059.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 4- RAISE CONDUIT IN TUNNEL 11 This item is for relocating a temporary five-inch conduit installed as shown on Section F on Contract Drawing 1E05 in Tunnel No. 11 where it interferes with the installation of Waste Activated Sludge pipe shown on Section J on Contract Drawing 1M02. The temporary conduit will be left in place until after project closeout as part of a interum solution to provide adequate short circuit ratings to electrical equipment in the plant. This item was accomplished by Contractors force account pursuant to Section 10.6(B)2(b)of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1362-09) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 5191.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 5- WATER HEATER CONDUIT AND WIRE This item is for providing conduit, wire, and the necessary modificatibns to Motor Control Center MA to provide power to the water heater in Room R603 of the Dissolved Air Flotation Thickener Control Room shown on Contract Drawing 6A01. The electrical requirements were omitted from the electrical drawings. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH P1362-04) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $4,525.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 3 of 6 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9272"127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Margate Construction C.O. No.: Four (4) Date: Sept. 25. 1996 Job: Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1. Job No, P1-36-2 ITEM 6- MISCELLANEOUS REVISIONS AT SECONDARY CLARIFIERS This item is for revising the east side secondary clarifier outlet box shown on Section D on Contract Drawing 4SO7 to allow space for construction shoring between an existing electrical duct bank and the box. This item also provides a traffic rated grating for the scum sump shown on Plan B on Contract Drawing 4SO6 and new grating to cover an opening at the west side secondary effluent channel outlet box shown on Plan A on Drawing 4M01. The original drawings required a standard treadplate cover for the scum sump which is located in a traffic area. The drawings omitted the grating required for the opening at the west side outlet box. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 1D-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH P1362-019) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $2,630.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: OCalendar Days ITEM 7- DISSOLVED AIR FLOTATION THICKENER DRAIN This item is for providing a four-inch floor drain at the southeast comer of the Dissolved Air Flotation Thickener gallery floor routed to a proposed sump shown on Contract Drawing 6M08. Additional work includes one floor drain, pipe, concrete encasement and drainage groove modifications. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1362-023) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 997.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 8- REVISE SECONDARY EFFLUENT PIPE JOINTS This item is for revising the joint detail for the 72-inch reinforced concrete pipe from a Type III double gasketed joint as detailed in Standard Drawing S-042 to a Type I single gasketed joint detailed in Standard Drawing 5-042. The pipe is low pressure and double gasketed joints are not necessary. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1362-014) CREDIT AMOUNT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ (24.000.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 4 of 6 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728.8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Maraate Construction C.O. No.: Four(4) Dale: Sept. 25, 1996 Job: Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-36-2 ITEM 9- BLOWER LOCAL CONTROL PANEL CONDUIT AND WIRE REVISIONS This item deletes conduit and wire providing power to the blower automatic roll filters replaced with panel type filters by Change Order No. 3, Item 2. The wiring is not needed with the panel filters. The item also deletes conduit and wire routed between the Blower Building Main Control Panel CP-BB and the four blower local control panels shown on Contract Drawings 2E05 and 2E06. This conduit and wire is replaced with one Modbus Plus cable and conduit. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10.6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH P1362-014) CREDIT AMOUNT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ (13,903.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 10 - REVISED SECONDARY CLARIFIER DRAIN This item deletes both the underground 8-inch clarifier drain connecting the new east side clarifier drain to the OAF facility drain system and the new west side clarifier drain to the proposed scum sump. This item includes connection of the new east and west side clarifier drains to their respective existing clarifier drains located in the clarifier gallery. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1362-022, PCH P1362-02) CREDIT AMOUNT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ (8,631.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 11 - DELETE PROGRAMMING COMPUTER This item deletes the programming computer specified in Detailed Specification 67-0561. Districts will provide a more powerful computer to be used for project programming. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10.6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1362- 032) CREDIT AMOUNT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ (2,100.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL AMOUNT THIS CHANGE ORDER: $24.733.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days Page 5 of 6 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9272M127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Margate Construction C.O. No.: Four(4) Date: Sept. 25, 1996 Job: Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-36-2 The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: September 18, 1995 Original Contract Time: 900 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: March 5, 1998 Time Extension this C.O.: 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 0 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: Not Applicable Revised Final Completion Due Date: Not Applicable Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Original Contract Price $35,291,000.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ (397,726.001 This Change (Add)(Deduet) $ 24 733.00 Amended Contract Price $34,918,007.00 Page 6 of 6 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Mamate Construction C.O. No.: Four(4) Date: Sept. 25, 1996 Job: Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. Pt-36-2 Board Authorization Dale: September 25, 1996 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA itled by: Reviewed by: onstmetion Manager Date Engineering Manager Date Apprord by: Approved a o Form: �• b'-Ta-9` buArgl7r, ,R'Di ctor of Engineering Date Gene I Counsel Date Accepted by: MARGATE CONSTRU Contractor C.THOMAS NIEGEIHDIN Dale PRESIDENT AGENDA a c� mFo.aEM a Ill COMYACTlOfJ.trEN ITEM TRANSMITTAL m .. . {NONCONS�m " UQPu.�.ICHEARIt� J�am���✓ �/�.605.M1F_ETpfG DFTE T.Bf)6.:.GENDA ITEM tp. MEETING DATE COME.!.ID.NO. DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION�ZL (InNals of Originator) OMITS: CtATS PDC:989E l FAHR: FAHft _ EXEC EXEC ALL 3730 Tom Dawes, Ext. 5080 : STEER STEER: JT.BDS:9.2596 DMsian No.,Name,and Erierlsion AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED WITH PHASE II AND III OF THE STRATEGIC PLAN INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (ALL DISTRICTS): PDC Committee Recommended Actionfsl: 1. Proceed with Phase II (Treatment, Reuse and Disposal Facilities) and authorize staff to solicit proposals and negotiate a final PSA for said work. 2. Direct staff to proceed with Phase III (Programmatic Environmental Impact Report) and authorize staff to solicit proposals and negotiate a PSA for said work. Staff Recommended Action(sl: The Engineering Department requests authority to proceed with the remaining work on the Strategic Plan including authority to negotiate Addendum No. 1 to PSA With Camp Dresser& McKee for Phase II, Treatment, Reuse and Disposal Facilities, and Request for Proposals and negotiate a Professional Services Agreement(PSA) for Preparation of Programmatic Environmental Impact Report, Phase III. CEOA REVIEW: Project is Exempt: NO DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC REM: Date Notice of Exemption Filed: Negative Declandlon Approved on New EIR will be prepared Final Ell Approved on_and Nolke of Determination filed on_ March P7,false FUNDS BUDGETED: Total: $905,000 CURRENT YEAR CURRENT YEAR-To- YEAR-TO43ATE TOTAL REVISED SOURCE: CORF BUDGET AMOUNT DATE EXPENDITURES BUDGET BALANCE PROJECT COST September B,Page 7,D.I.d and D.l.e Phase ll $100,000 $100,000 $750,000 AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: Phase III 5.000 $0,00 5,000 155,000 Scheduldl Item: Total $105,000 $105.000 $905,000 WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO CONSISTENT WITH BOARD POLICY? YES If YES,state number: _Permanent Limited Term CONCURRENCE ATTACHMENTS TO AGENDA(list) e Dtla hdvio ( TO Cemmelea: 1. Budget lnlorrnalion Tebl¢ SlgnaNre Dale Department Head(Or Dedill elk4 .1t'&* J». 9,lll To JL Bol 1 Budget Information Table %ighsure K/� Date Assistant General Manager(Or Designee) J:\WPDOCIPDC96\SEPUB01 Page 1 of 3 SsOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (Background and/or Summary) The information presented below is the basis for the recommendation made by staff to the PDC Committee. The PDC Committee, after discussion of the staffs recommendation,is recommending to the Board of Directors that staff proceed with Phase II of the Strategic Plan by soliciting proposals,selecting a qualified firm and negotiating a Professional Services Agreement. As the Directors are aware,the Districts are now preparing a new Strategic Plan. Phase I,which includes three projects, investigation of our ocean outfall,determination of peak discharges and a financial study,is now underway. Staff proposes to start the remaining work, Phases II and III,at this time. Phase II Includes the study of capital and operational treatment plant issues and reuse of wastewater and biosolids. Phase III includes public participation and the preparation of a programmatic EIR. Staff believes that it will be most advantageous to negotiate with Camp Dresser&McKee(CDM)to perform the Phase II work. CDM has considerable experience in doing similar work with other agencies nationwide and is doing an excellent job In their portion of Phase I work. COM's Phase I work includes determination of peak hydraulic discharges,ways to reduce those peak Rows and financial studies to determine fair and equitable charges for both capital and operational requirements. Much of the work that CDM has completed has direct bearing on needed work for Phase II and,therefore,R is believed that this will be the most efficient way to achieve a quality product. Additionally,a new engineering firm would add tremendously to staff requirements in management of this project. Phase III is the preparation of a Program EIR,including the required public participation. The Districts'Program EIR must emphasize the effects of the Districts'wastewater program on the marine environment and there are only a few firms considered qualified to do this very specialized work. Staff proposes to send a Request for Proposal(RFP)to a'short list" and negotiate a professional services agreement with the most qualified firm. If the Directors approve staffs recommendation to negotiate with CDM for Phase II of this Strategic Plan,and send RFPs to a short list for Phase III of the Strategic Plan,final Scopes of Work will be prepared and negotiations held for a Professional Services Agreement. The PSA will be returned to the Committee and Boards of Directors for final approval. The funds budgeted for this fiscal year($105,000)will not be sufficient to conduct the work anticipated. Therefore,a budget adjustment will be requested when the PSAs are brought forward to the PDC Committee and Boards of Directors for approval. urWr00Cw0C96vseP\96o1. Page 2 of 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE TASK BUDGET FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED (ADOPTED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL COMPLETE TO BY CORF) TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZED DATE FUNDS Phase II of $750,000 $0.00 -0- -0- -0- Strategic Plan Phase III of $155.000 W00 -0- -0- -0- Strategic Plan TMD:dIlmf c: Department Head AGM-Administration AGM-Operabons General Manager J:\WPDOC\PDC96%SEPW01 Page 3 of 3 ReN wWM For Bd.Sco Vae Qd AGENDA GOMA.ACTON EM ITEM TRANSMITTAL e+Ti CI �PUkJG HEA4".T3 . .. PXT,BD .NEE yDATE JT ED...6G MEETING DATE Cori",10.NO. DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION - (Inilwkol Onginator) OMITS: PDC:9/5/96 PDC �� FAHR: FAHfi EXEC: STEER ALL 3720,Wendy Sevenandt,5058 STEER: Division No.,Name,and Extension JT.BDS:925/96 AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Agenda Wording: AMENDMENT NO.3 TO MODIFICATIONS TO ELECTRICAL AND CONTROL SYSTEMS AND PROCESS EVALUATIONS AT PLANT NO. 1,JOB NO. P1-40-1.AND MODIFICATIONS TO ELECTRICAL AND CONTROL SYSTEMS AND PROCESS EVALUATIONS AT PLANT NO.2,JOB NO.P247-1 (All Districts):The Engineering Department and the Director of Engineering requests that the Professional Services Agreement with Lee&Ro Consulting Engineers ,Inc., be amended providing for additional engineering services for design changes at an increase of$76,801.00. Recommended Action(s): Approve Amendment No.3 to the Professional Services Agreement with Lee&Ro Consulting Engineers,Inc.,increasing the contract amount to$1,247,967.00. CEOA REVIEW: Project is Exempt: Yes MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM: Dale Notice of Exemption Filed-12H Sle3 11&93 FUNDS BUDGETED: Total: $23,918,000 CURRENTYEAR CURRENT YEAR-TO- YEAR-TOLATE TOTAL REVISED SOURCE: CORF BUDGETAMOUNT DATE EXPENDITURES BUDGET BALANCE PROJECT COST ScheduldLine Item:Section 8,pages 4&5,A.5.b., A.S.a,B.S.a.,8.4.a. $650,000 $0 $650,000 $23.918,000 AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: SchedulerUre It. WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO CONSISTENT WITH BOARD POLICY? YES If YES,state number: _Permanent Umeed Terrn CONCURRENCES: / ATTACHMENTS TO AGENDA(List) Signature D Is Division M r Designee) To Committee: 1. Budget In(onretion Table 8-ss-jr" Signature Date Department ed — 1 To Jt.atls.: t. signature glate Assistant General Manager(Or Designee) u • , � . Y ..��& _, ... .Y= ,e...�., F..,.,�'t=a:. � .. ..,..'= Sd3 -. . }'•U�`,Y l.'..a....x ADDITIONAL INFORMATION(BaokgramE an4/or Summary) The 12 kV Distribution Support Facilities at Plant No. 1,Job No.P147,is included in a PSA with Lee&Ro Consulting Engineers, Inc.,for the design of four jobs containing miscellaneous projects. See the attached Budget Information Table for a summary of the cost information pertinent to each job of the PSA. This addendum requests additional funds for only one of the four jobs,Job No.P1-47. Job No.P1-47 will convert the power feed from Southern California Edison Company to the Central Generation Facility for the Control Center,Administration Building and Central Laboratory. The other support facilities; Auto Shop,maintenance buildings,and Warehouse;will be supplied with new power feeds to relieve some of the load on Power Building No.4. Additionally,the original project includes work at the Central Laboratory to separate critical loads from non-critical loads and to provide increased power reliability for the critical loads by installing an uninterruptable power supply(UPS). The general philosophy regarding 12 kV distribution has been discussed by staff at some length. Over the years,the Districts'philosophy has evolved significantly in terms of the type of switching equipment(manual load break switches, electric motor operated switches,and full-featured air circuit breakers)and in terms of the environmental requirements for the 12 kV electrical switching equipment(indoor versus outdoor). Staff recommends that the current project be revised to incorporate the proposed electrical distribution equipment in a new power building,to be consistent with the recent 12 kV electrical distribution philosophy employed at the Districts. Some of the latest projects consistent with this approach include Power Building 5 and 6 at Plant 1 and Distribution Center`C"at Plant 2. The concept of housing electrical gear in a power building will also enable maintenance staff to employ maintenance procedures which are consistent with our other electrical distribution facilities. Their training and qualifications better support working on indoor equipment. The Districts also intends to design and install a load demand management system in the near future. The proposed design changes will accommodate these future design requirements. Other proposed changes to the scope of the design are the result of a system evaluation after the November failure of the Control Center UPS. Since completion of the Control Center and the process monitoring and control computer system, additional computer equipment has been relocated or added to the computer room in the Control Center. These computers and related equipment support the Laboratory, Computerized Maintenance Management System,and Operations Process Computer(CRISP). Due to the critical nature of these computerized applications,the existing power distribution and power conditioning system at the Control Center is not adequate. The proposed changes to the Consultant's scope of work include the design of a new power building with indoor electrical power distribution equipment and a centrally located power distribution network,an evaluation of UPS options for the Control Center and design of the UPS and an additional source of power to the new equipment in the Control Center. Providing indoor electrical distribution equipment and a building will add an estimated$385,000 to the original construction estimate of $2,440,000. Providing the new UPS at the Control Center will add an estimated$175,000 to the project construction cost. The proposed design changes will increase the original construction estimate from$2,440,000 to$3,000,000. Switching from Edison to Central Generation power supply will yield an annual cost savings estimated at$150,000 per year. As a result of their previous work an this project, Lee&Ro understands the building loads,electrical distribution and conduit and cable routing issues. They have field-investigated the existing conduit and cable routing. They have also performed the research and written the specification for the rotary UPS which is an alternative for the Control Center UPS improvements. WS:dI c: Department Head AGM-Administration AGM-Operations General Manager J:OP000IPDC961SEPU 02. Page 2 of 2 Revision: 811/96 AGENDA P eYc ,�rE� ITEM mm CTION TRANSMITTAL I � T MEETING DATECOMM.ID-NO. DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION (InPlab of Onginxtor) OMTS: ,'OMTS PDC:9/5/96 POOL FAHR: "' +"FAHR 3720,Wendy Sevenandt,5058 EXEC:9/18/96 Q' ^„�- ,,,,; All STEER: {Y ,^ ° "� a Diviso,No.,Name.and ElOerolon JT.BDS:925/96 , c , AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Agenda Wording: JOB NO. P7-00-2 (REBID),FACILITY MODIFICATIONS AND SAFETY UPGRADES AT PLANT NO. 1, AND JOB NO. P247-2(REBID), FACILITY MODIFICATIONS AND SAFETY UPGRADES AT PLANT NO.2(All Districts): The Director of Engineering requests that a construction contract be awarded IS miscellaneous tasks for operational and Safety related improvements to the treatment plants. The PDC Committee and Executive Committee reviewed the proposed actions by the Joint Boards at their meeting of September 25, 1996 in response to a protest letter from Margate Construction, Inc. protesting the bid of Pascal 8 Ludwig Engineers. Recommended Action(s): 1)Approve Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications correcting the date for receipt of bids;2) Receive and file letter dated August 21,1996 from Margate Construction,Inc. protesting the bid of Pascal and Ludwig Engineers; 3) Receive and file memoranda from General Counsel dated September 10, 1996 and September 17, 1996; -AND- 4) Reject protest of Margate Construction,Inc.;5)Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation;and 6)Award contract to Pascal 8 Ludwig Engineers for Job Nos. Pt-40-2(Rebid)and P247-2(Rebid),in a total amount of $1,878.437.00; -OR- 7)Accept protest of Margate Construction,Inc.,declaring Pascal and Ludwig Engineers are ineligible to bid pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 5105;and 8)Award contract to Margate Construction, Inc.,second lowest bidder,for Job Nos. P140-2(Rebid)and P2-47-2 (Rebid),in a total amount of$1,900,000.00. CEQA REVIEW: Projeel Is Exempt: Yes DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM: Dale Notke of Exemption Filed:1 VIU93 724/96 BUDGET INFORMATION CURRENTYEAR CURRENT YEAR- YEAR-TO43ATE REYISEDBUDGET TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.: $3,673,000 BUDGET AMOUNT TO-DATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL SOURCE: CORF,Sectione,pages485 EXPENDITURESSchodu Rmi6.avm pw ln.��.t AMOUNT OF llem:A.FER 8.6.a. $1,600,000 $0 $1,600,000 $3,673,000 AMOUNT OFTRANSFER: SchedulelLine Item: AIT/PROJECT COST INFORMATION ORIGINAL BID,PO, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED PROJECT CONTRACT FUNDS PREV. REQUESTED THIS AMOUNT AMOUNT APPROVED AT $1,878,437.00 WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? NO If YES,state numEer. _Permanent Limited Term II VES,e�laln In ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section CONCURRENCES' ATTACHMENTS TO AGENDA(List) Q If /a nj To Committee: 1. Letter dated August 21, 1996,from d 7L' Margate Construction,Inc. Si ature Da0 2. Memorandum dated September 10, ' on M n er estgn 1996,from General Counsel regarding Bid Protest 3. Memorandum dated September 10, Signature Data 1996,from General Counsel regarding Depart a �(Dr Igoe Bid Protest Appeal by Margate Construction Signature ate 10 it, Ms.: 1. Letter dated August 21, 1996,from Assistant General Manager(Or Designee) Margate Construction,Inc. 2. Memorandum dated September 10, 1996,from General Counsel regarding Bid Protest 3. Memorandum dated September 10, 1996,from General Counsel regarding Bid Protest Appeal by Margate Construction 4. Memorandum dated September 17, 1996,from General Counsel regarding Bid Protest 5. Bid Tabulation and Recommendation OMTS COMM. PDC COW. FAHR COMM; JOINT BOARDS Mccbng Date. .Approved: Amended _ FOTYIatded ttll,F '.: i WPDOOIAGENDAWITS-96V3EPT1J 2R BIF Page 2 of Revision: ea?M6 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION(Background and/or Summary) On May 21, 1996,four bids were received with a low bid of$1,644,000.00 submitted by Pascal and Ludwig Engineers. In Pascal& Ludwig's review of their bid following the bid opening,they found a clerical error in tabulating their costs associated with the project and formally requested that their bid be removed from consideration for this project. This request was reviewed with District's counsel,who concluded that the error qualifies for bidder relief under the criteria of Public Contract Code Section 5103. The second lowest bidder,Advanco Constructors,submitted a bid of$1,882,036.00 which was $238,036,or 14%higher than the low bid,and over the Engineers estimate of$1,700,000. Staff recommended rejecting all bids,rebidding the job to clarify technical information within the original scope of work and amendment of the original scope of work to add and delete items of work. Staff recommended and the Boards of Directors approved at the July 24, 1996 meeting the request of Pascal &Ludwig Engineers for withdrawal of their bid and exonerated the bid bond submitted in connection with said bid. The Boards also authorized the rebid of the contract with a revised Engineers estimate of$1,900,000(an increase of 12%). Following the bid rejection in May,the staff made the following key changes to the bid plans and specifications: • There was a significant change in philosophy regarding the use of the Hazardous Waste Materials Lockers at Plant No. 1. The Districts originally proposed to use the lockers for storage only of hazardous waste materials. The Districts revised the proposed use to include dispensing and storage of the material within the lockers. Dispensing of chemicals falls under specific code requirements for open containers and human occupancy of the lockers and the design was revised to include these code requirements. These code requirements state that the locker must have forced mechanical ventilation which uses Class 1,Division 1, explosion proof motorized fans,ducting to draw vapors away from human occupancy,strengthened walls and explosion relief panels,and automatic controls for isolation of the locker in the event of a fire. Further review of the original lockers proposed in the first bid led to an improved layout for the workers. The revised design combined four separate small lockers into one compartmentalized locker and adjusted the size, location and access to the large flammable/combustable materials locker. The estimated construction cost increase for these design changes was$50.000. • During the original bid period,the design consultant was completing the design of ventilation improvements to the locker rooms at Building No.6. This ventilation improvement was being fast-tracked for separate bid to support the relocation of the Safety Division to Building No.6. The installation of ventilation for the locker rooms was included in the rebid for ease of project management and economy of scale(a separate task at the Truck Loading Facility at Plant No.1 has ventilation improvements). The estimated construction cost increase for this addition is$34,000, • A small project design for another ventilation improvement had concurrently been completed by Carollo Engineers at the time of the original bid. This completed design was incorporated into the plans and specifications for the rebid of this project for ease of project management and economy of scale (two separate tasks,one at the Truck Loading Facility at Plant No. 1 and one at the North Scrubber Complex at Plant No.2 have similar ventilation fan and ductwork improvements). The estimated construction cost increase for this addition is$30,000. The revised plans and specifications also included clarifications of technical details in the original project and deletion of work tasks including deletion of a liner under a concrete pad for 90-day hazardous waste storage lockers(cost savings), clarification of the specification for a patio structure (cost savings),a change to the requirement for reinforcement of fiberglass reinforced plastic ducting (cost savings), clarification to structural aluminum coating thickness(cost savings),and deletion of the removal of abandoned gas compressors and centrifuge which were removed by the Purchasing Department during the original bid period (cost savings). On August 21, 1996,Margate Construction sent a letter to the Districts protesting the bid of Pascal and Ludwig, asserting that the scope of work was essentially unchanged in the re-bid. The letter from Margate Construction did not address the impact of the changes to the original work tasks as described above. The changes made to the original specifications are material in staffs opinion. These changes resulted in a substantial Increase in the cost of the project as outlined above. WS:dYmf c: Department Head AGM-Administration AGM-Operations General Manager J:WPDOC1AGENDAv11T5-96ZEPT140.2RAIF Page 3 of 3 Revision: 62N96 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION, ING 25009 SOUTH RGU EROA STREET CARSON, CALIFORNIA TELEPHONE No 131 OI B30.B610 POST OFFICE BOX 950> ZIP CODE 90749 FAX NO.13101 030.9276 August 21, 1996 Orange County Sanitation Districts Attn: Mr. Donald F. McIntyre 10844 Ellis Avenue Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Attention: Mr. Donald F. McIntyre General Manager Subject: Bid Received August 20, 1996 for: Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-40-2 (REBID) Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 2, Job No. P247-2 (REBID) Dear Mr. McIntyre, Margate Construction, Inc. bid subject project originally on May 21, 1996 and "REBID' of the project on August 20, 1996. The apparent low bidder on both occasion was Pascal & Ludwig Engineers from Ontario, California. Following is a summary of the facts relating to the bidding of this project loth on May 21, 1996, and on August 20, 1996. Bid of May 21, 1996 The Engineers Estimate for this project was$1,700,000.00. Pascal & Ludwig Engineers bid was $1,644,000.00. It is our understanding that Pascal & Ludwig Engineers eHher verbally or in writting claimed a mistake and asked relief from their bid proposal. Their bid was under the Engineers Estimate and would have been awarded to them if they had not asked for relief. The second bidder on this occasion was Advanoo Constructors at $1,882,036.00. It is our understanding that the project was not awarded to the second bidder because it was over the Engineers Estimate. The Sanitation Districts decided to re-advertise and take new bids. Bid of August 20, 1996 The Orange County Sanitation Districts re-advertised subject project as a "REBID"with minor modifications. The main modification added a ventilation system to the Metering and Diversion Structure and ventilation improvements at Building No. 1 at Plant No. 1. This modification was worth less than $40,000,00, and was minor in nature. The miscellaneous modifications made to the project did not materially change the scope of the project. Pascal & Ludwig Engineers bid the "REBID" project and was the apparent low bidder at$1,878,437.00. The Public Contracts Code section 5105 (Prohibition on Participation in Further Bidding) states "A bidder who claims a mistake or who forfeits his or her bid security shall be prohibited from participating in future bidding on the project on which the mistake was claimed or security forfeited." Mr.Donald F.McIntyre August 21, 1996 - Page 2 If the information provided above is correct and we have reason to believe that it is, Margate Construction, Inc. formally protests the bid of Pascal & Ludwig Engineers for subject project and asks the Sanitation Districts of Orange County find that the bid of Pascal & Ludwig Engineers was not legal under the Public Contracts Code. Very truly yours, MMARGAT�E CONSTRUCTION, INC. C. Thomas Riegelhuth President CTR:mer Encl.: Public Contracts, page 482 g 5103 P bLic Cmerat= C. Alt,Rehmudm/ar hfntaken Md Pbo dff nim ttd the low lid on a pubi a iob,Fat nwpoend a dtdmd poan so$11 D,452 boosx 510452.The may.k7VMdg the mar,uevnt ele" the bld.Haindlf had dwrieinto reselyd,but entefd b®aformal m>Paa.In ordrmteon themno'a4 ti room he an tmdwmsdin be weep the parnes vmnMly rechrd To Yoni g.Hen these vain no 277 P- d638 e7amaoon wn brposs@+ie.Lensage E6.rbic v Carn1'./San 6aaf4n t6 r r Jd 659. 297 Pld t38(1956). Fvhff u e ofSecrvdy. Forrxf Covemsen Code 4200 perm tied sdfcf beam of a mime in the bid;phimHwas en ti to sue for the recmesy ofifw ammo fakftmd PlaiatF had Bed a bid bad inthoamowM of$91,613(TO peeefd;one,these was fnvdfy no^imaaR fafaimr Ceaal desaarn ssaaurd REVERSED.io teptre an aural(odemae wash(nemamthele�SlaMw arpme demddrg The psoadimp.Ballwr Aodam CoobW.'mn Coy. v The Rapana o/me Unis emn,o/Card i 80 Cal 4Ao 3d327, 74S QL 17. 498(797B1. /pocase Bard on A4hvke HaV lovdiid. The®lffW=nude a mipdkn in Its bid. as and on the r lee, the oxarz ing agexy ioaysed the manna price by f7,000, wkhm rdmnm the cootmta forcornpeteive bids.NELO.The award of the additenal 57,000 was invalid A p jbhc canna a imald atless it is (e in acmdxt¢ with the cmpetdiw II'R 9 mvgvir heh¢ Cur v Witcheock, 277 CdApp.2d 334, 76 QLAgy%376(79691. f 5104 B®gtictg aces Nodme Other than the mdco to roe pvbtic comy,no d i.rec m to be filed bdore brmgbtg the accroe. aF.rwe P 6,Saar f982 t2 af5 2 f 5105 Prohibition on Partidpadon is Further Bid&i g A bidder wba tta®s a drake w who(oricim his or her bid security stall be ptoht3ud from partiaeatmg In fumh� bidding uo the project on rhisb she�was chimed m sr ry for- Cend. - �vrnm q Sam f9tQ Q 1fJ f 2 Second Bid~,ded Cana sm*m dnkarsnon,.G fthm he was not pedtded from quar&m% as the Iowest msponnLle bdder by fanner Cavam eiert Cade Section 42DS,.Itdh prdibiaM a biddw who slimed a mistake from parddpamg in furdw bddeQ,on Qse project for wNch The rrmmke we, chimed The cynpacmr darned that the job was so cvrgd on de rebid that 4 did not mnaNm Me sane project AFFIRMED. The mco d bid w no the same project and was thndae binned by sin.. Cor=bo tbaaVc Ca vPaAama UmnoSchodOcbxc 136 Ca7AppJde6S, 786 CJLRpp. QJ (7962). f 5106 t;oea>•C Awaad w Bfddc If the public mdq den®it is for is bear m evc c,it may,on nsfml w failure of the succendW bidder to ezmue the e000 ..and u m the sctmd lowea bidder. Ifthesecwrilorercbidderfats oerdwa meaensre theme the publiceedcytroy likewise awrd a to,the third I m bidder. On the faivae or tefival of The scco nd or thud kswea bidder to whom a caoma is so a .tied to ereeaue it.ids or her bidder's manic,shall be fie wise forfeited. Min.: ZY b7 Sma 1982 m y3532 f 5107 (,brick Desert>smadan of Amon In all amass brought under the provisions of tbis dupe r.all coons wherein web acdom arc or mry hnvftn be persd-&shall give stab actiorn preference over a0 odor civil accons Thereto. in the mane of setting the same for hearing or trial,and in Fearing the sntse,To the end that a0 such aKmo�—ur shall be g ckly And and dcsemrmed. M. Essvd bf Sin is'"a fif 32 462 5hepao's/MCGaw+liil (1995) AUGUST 21, 1996 11:00 a.m. Bin TARIII ATInN PROJECT TITLE: JOBS NO. Pi-40-2 REBID AND P2-47-2 REBID PROJECT DESCRIPTION: FACILITY MODIFICATIONS AND SAFETY UPGRADES AT PLANTS NO. 1 AND 2 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE: &1 onn nnn _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ TOTAL CONTRACTOR BID i. PASCAL & LUDWIG ENGINEERS $1,878,437.00 2. MARGATE CONSTRUCTION, INC. $1,900,000.00 3. ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS $1,956,231.00 4. 5. 6. 7. B. 9. 10. I have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend award to Pascal & Ludwig Engineers in the bid amount of &1 A7R 437 nn as the lowest and best bid. C avid Aavid A. L Director of Engineering J:1W PDOC1ENMP1-40-2R1aIDTAB.M CSDOC 0 P.O.Box 8127 0 FoM.in Valley,CA 92728-8127 0 (714)962-2411 k t AGENDA )t;' ITEM v1 TRANSMITTAL rr , all S i MEETING DATE COtAM 10.YSQ q DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION (Inhialsof Ongintar) ows �MTS - b'Y PDC' mnms a P t 3790,Bud Palmqulst,Extension 51M FAHR' L R' ° Derision No.,Name,and Extension EXEC' E7CEG' \ JTBD S I - AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Agenda Wording: APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NOS. 2 AND 3 TO CONTRACT 3-36R WITH ALBERT W. DAVIES, INC. ;AND ACCEPT THE CONTRACT AS COMPLETE AND AUTHORIZE EXECUTION OF THE NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT. The Construction Manager and Director of Engineering request approval of Change Order No. 2 providing six items of additional work and Change Order No. 3, Adjustment of Engineers Quantities and Final Closeout Agreement of the Westminster Avenue Force Main (First Unit) and new Westside Pump Station Force Main. Recommended Action(s): Approve Change Order No. 2 to Contract No. 3-36R with Albert W. Davies, Inc. for an addition of$31,301,55, approve Change Order No. 3, Adjuslmentnf Engineers Quantities for a deduction of$42,216.00, for a total contract amount of$3,823,756.55, and approve final Closeout Agreement. CEQA REVIEW: Project is Exempt: Yea DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM: Date Notice of Exemption Filed 429.93 7I44196 FUNDS BUDGETED: Total: $4,636,DDD CURRENTYEAR CURRENT YEAR-TO- YEAR-TO4)ATE TOTAL REVISED SOURCE: DISTRICT 3 C.I.P.;Item 14.Sect.6, BUDGET AMOUNT DATE EXPENDITURES BUDGET BALANCE PROJECT COST Page 31 $300,000 $60,100 $239'goo $3,823,756.55 WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO CONSISTENT WITH BOARD POLICY? YES CON RENCES: ATTACHMENTSTO AGENDA(List) G7 p_2 �` To CommMee: 1. Change Order No.2 �/ G 2. Change Order No.3 sigrature Dale Division anger(Or Designee) 4 8- --Z--46 re Date ZTo Jt.Bds.: 1. Signed Change Order No.2 Departure Hea (Or esig e) 2. Signed Change Order No.3 Z z i6 Signature Date Assistant General Manager(Or Designee) MeaIII�Batec x OMTO COMK"AARYM a� PDGCOMaa :_�`"s:AtBi COzw i Fes: J �\, A M a3ep 3 n g n ar i �� J:1W PDO C)EN GQ-36RIA IT.W PO 0 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (Background and/or Summary) Contract No.3-36R,Replacement of Westminster Avenue Force Main (First Unit) and new Westside Pump Station Force Main consists of replacing the old 30-inch reinforced plastic mortar pipe(RPMP)force main with a new 424nch ductile iron pipe force main (approximately 13,700 linear feet)in Westminster Avenue from the Districts Seal Beach Pump Station(C'By of Seal Beach)to an outlet structure at Hammond Place in the City of Westminster,and the installation of a new 204nch ductile iron pipe force main within a 304nch diameter steel casing from the Westside Pump Station to a junction structure adjacent to Old Ranch Parkway. The project was designed by The Keith Companys. The contract was awarded on June 20, 1995 to Albert W.Davies, Inc. This contract is 100%complete. Change Order No.2 is an addition in the amount of$31,301.55 to the contract for six items of additional work and 25 calendar days time extension and Change Order No.3 is a deduction of $42,216 for the Adjustment of Engineer's Quantities. The following is a summary of the contract: Original Contract Price $3,760,000.00 Previously Authorized Changes $ 74,671.00 Change Order No.2 $ 31,301.55 Change Order No.3 $ (42,216.00) Change Orders to Date $ 63,756.55 Percentage Increase/Decrease 1.70% Amended Contract Price $3,823,756.55 The following tables summarize the Change Orders. For additional details on individual items,we attached Change Orders. CHANGE ORDER NO.2 REM NO. DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DAYS TYPE 1 Removal of undisclosed sheet piling $11.541.77 8 Changed Condition 2 Removal of undadosed excess concrete encasement 12,532.74 10 Changed Condition 3 Removal of undsdosed reinforced concrete storm drain and 1.878.05 3 Changed Condition flinch water fine 4 Removal of undisclosed concrete storm drain box 464.32 1 Changed Condition 5 Removal of undisclosed concrete piling 2,072.77 1 Changed Condition 6 Removal of electrical duct bank 2,811.90 2 Changed Condition TOTAL-Change Order No.2 $31,301.55 25 CHANGE ORDER NO.3 REM NO. DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DAYS TYPE 1 Adjustment of Engineers Quantities-ADD $16.785 0 Other 1 Adjustment of Engineers Quantities-DEDUCT (59,001) 0 Other TOTAL-Change Order No.3 $(42,216) 0 There is a total of 67 calendar days time extension for Change Order No.1 and No.2. Liquidated damages on this contract are$500 per day and there are no bonus provisions. The time extensions am not subject to Liquidated Damages. eP:lh c: Department Head AGM-Administration AGM-Operations General Manager Page 2 of 2 J:\W PDOC\ENG11.36R%IT.W PD Page 1 of 5 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 108"ELLIS AVENUE,P.O.BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Albert W.Davies,Inc. C.O. No.: Two(2) Date: September 25, 1996 Job: Replacement of Westminster Avenue Force Main(First Unit)and Westside PumD Station Force Main Contract No. 3-36R Amount of this Change Order(Add)(Deduct) $31,301.55 In accordance with contract provisions,the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized,and as compensation,the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 -REMOVAL OF UNDISCLOSED AND ABANDONED IN-PLACE SHEET PILING Between Station Number 89+76 and 89+20 abandoned sheet piling in-place had to be removed form the trench zone during the construction of new 42-inch D.I.P.line. The conflict with the sheet piling was caused by the design alignment being in direct conflict with an existing United States Navy metering structure. By altering the design alignment to avoid the metering structure,R created a subsequent conflict with the above driven steel sheet piling. It is Staffs opinion that this is not a design error. The as-built information received from the USN did not provide sufficient structural detail of the substructure geometric configuration to allow the designer to avoid the conflict. The abandoned steel sheet piling was not shown on the contract drawings but was shown on the as-built drawings for Contract No. 3-13-1,Westminster Avenue Force Main,Second Unit. This sheet piling was installed under Contract No, 3-13-1 to protect the existing 30-inch Unit No, 1 Force Main and the construction notes stated that R was to be abandoned in-place. This Rem of work was accomplished by contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $11,541.77 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 8 Calendar Days ITEM 2 -REMOVAL OF UNDISCLOSED EXCESS CONCRETE ENCASEMENT Between Station Numbers 114+37 to 114+84(westside of Bolas Chica Channel crossing)and Station numbers 116+07 to 116+87 (eastside of channel),the contract plans called for the removal of concrete encasement around an existing 304nch steel pipe. During installation of the new 42-inch steel pipe within the above reaches, the contractor encountered concrete encasement that was well in excess of the removal limits disclosed in the profile of the contract documents. In addition,the encasement in the vicinity of the thrust blocks included concrete piers with I-beams that had to be removed. This was not indicated on the contract documents. This Rem of work was accomplished by contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b)of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $12,532.74 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 10 Calendar Days Page 2 of 5 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Albeit W. Davies, Inc. C.O.No.: Two(2) Date: September 25. 1996 Job: Replacement of Westminster Avenue Force Main(First Unit)and Westside Pump Station Force Main Contract No.3-36R ITEM 3-REMOVAL OF UNDISCLOSED REINFORCED CONCRETE STORM DRAIN BOX AND AN 8-INCH WATERLINE At Station Number 117+30 the contract plans showed an abandoned 8-Inch water line that did not cross the trench zone of the new 42-Inch ductile iron pipe. During excavation of the trench in this area,R was determined that this line encroached into the trench zone and had to be cut and removed. The contractor incurred down time to locate the line(potholing)and to determine if R was still live. In addition at Station No.117+10 the contractor had to install bulkheads on an undisclosed and abandoned Tx 6'stonn drain box that crossed the trench. This was not shown on the contract documents. This Rem of work was accomplished by contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10.6(B)2(b)of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,878.05 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 3 Calendar Days ITEM 4-REMOVAL OF UNDISCLOSED CONCRETE STORM DRAIN BOX At Station Number 137+40,the contractor was directed to remove and place a bulkhead on an abandoned Tx 5' storm drain box that encroached Into the trench zone. In addition the contractor experienced production delays and required an adjustment to his planned work. This box structure was not shown on the contract documents. This item of work was accomplished by contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provision. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 464.32 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 1 Calendar Day ITEM 5-REMOVAL OF UNDISCLOSED CONCRETE PILING At Station Number 11+55 located just outside the valve vault of the Seal Beach Pump Station,a concrete pier with an I-beam was in direct conflict with the grade of the new 424nch ductile iron pipe force main. The contractor removed the concrete pier and incurred delays in mainline production. This I-beam was abandoned in-place during construction of the old 30-inch Techile force main, It was used as a support for a kicker during the air testing of the line. This Rem was not shown on the contract documents. This Rem of work was accomplished by contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b)of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $2,07277 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 1 Calendar Day Page 3 of 5 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 108"ELLIS AVENUE, P.O.BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Albert W.Davies. Inc. C.O. No.: Two(2) Date: September 25, 1996 Job: Replacement of Westminster Avenue Force Main(First Unll)and Westside Pump Station Force Main Contract No. 3-36R ITEM 6-REMOVAL OF ELECTRICAL DUCT BANK The contractor was directed to alter the design grade of the new 424nch ductile iron pipe force main at Station Number 19+25 to avoid a conflict with a 1'x4'electdcal duct bank. This duct bank was not accurately shown on the contract documents. It was shown to be approrimately 1.5 feet above the 42-inch line,but in the field it was determined to have zero clearance over the crown of the pipe. In addition, the contractor incurred production delays. This hem of work was accomplished by contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b)of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $2,811.90 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 2 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $31,301.55 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 25 Calendar Days Page 4 of 5 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE,P.O.BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Albert W. Davies, Inc. C.O.No.: Two(2) Date: September 25, 1996 Job: Replacement of Westminster Avenue Force Main(First Unit)and Westside Pump Station Force Main Contract No. 3-36R The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 25 days extension of time is required to perform the work that s required for this Change Order, but that no direct or indirect,incidental or consequential costs, expenses,losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor,except as expressly granted and approve by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: June 20,1995 Original Contract Time: 360 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: June 13, 1996 Time Extension this C.O.: 25 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 67 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 427 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: August 18, 1996 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Original Contract Price $3,760,000.00 Prev.Authorized Changes $ 74,671.00 This Change(Add)(Bednd) $ 31,301.55 Amended Contract Price $3,865,972.55 Page 5 of 5 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Albert W. Davies, Inc. C.O. No.: Two (2) Date: September 25. 1996 Job: Replacement of Westminster Avenue Force Main(F st Unil)and Wastside Pump Station Force Main Contract No. 3-36R Board Authorization Date: September 25, 1996 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA tried by: Reviewed bye � ,��• �<-. �-e✓-mod � °: ; C onstruction Manager Date Engineering Manager Date Appr 1d�by: Appprrooved as to Form :ML �`E , ep— —A (: \ 91 ?#,,6 Dlrotorof Engineering Date GefteptilCounsel Date Accepted by: ALBERT W.DAMES,INC. Contractor ' Date Page 1 of 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 108"ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Albert W. Davies, Inc. C.O. No.: Three (3) Date: September 25, 1996 Job: Replacement of Westminster Force Main (First Unit) and Westside Pump Station Force Main Contract No. 3-36R Amount of this Change Order(Add)(Deduct) $ (42,216.00) In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized, and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 -ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S QUANTITIES ADD: Change in Quantity Item No. Unit Description From To Difference Unit Price Total 19. L.F. 20-in DIP FM 33 38 5 $720.00 $3,600.00 (NRJT) 23. L.F. 30-in dia.Steel 70 99.30 29.30 $450.00 $13,185.00 casing w/20in DIP carrier pipe SUBTOTAL: $16,785.00 DEDUCT: Change in Quantity Item No. Unit Description From To Difference Unit Price Total 8. LS. Inst.Diversion GL 100% 25% 75% $20,000.00 $15,000.00 to JT.Structure 17. Ton Asphalt concrete 800 565 235 $ 43.00 $10,105.00 shoulder 18. S.F. Slung Seal 54,000 45,666 8,334 $ .30 $ 2,500.00 21. L.F. 20in VCP 19 0 19 $ 340.00 $ 6,460.00 Gravity Sewer 22. V.F. 604n Manhole 12 0 12 $ 500.00 $ 6,000.00 25. L.S Temp.Sewage 100% 60% 40% $10,000.00 $ 4,000.00 by-pass 26. L.S. Refurb.Concrete 100% 0% 100% $ 6,200.00 $ 6,200.00 Junct.Structure 30. C.Y. Crushed Rock 500 136 364 $ 24.00 $ 8,736.00 24-36 inches SUBTOTAL: $59,001.00 CREDIT COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $(42,216.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL CREDIT COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $(42,216.00) TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days Page 2 of 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Albert W. Davies, Inc. C.O. No.: Three (3) Date: September25, 1996 Job: Replacement of Westminster Force Main (First Unit) and Westside Pump Station Force Main, Contract No. 3-36R The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect,incidental or consequential costs,expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except, as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: June 20, 1995 Original Contract Time: 360 Calendar Days Original Completion Dale: June 13, 1996 Time Extension this C.O.: 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 67 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 427 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: August 18, 1996 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Original Contract Price $3,760,000.00 Prev.Authorized Changes $ 105,972.55 This Change(Add)(Deduct) $ (42,216.00) Amended Contract Price $3,823,756.55 Page 3 of 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Albert W. Davies, Inc. C.O. No.: Three (3) Date: September 25, 1995 Job: Replacement of Westminster Force Main (First Unit) and Westside Pump Station Force Main, Contract No. 3-36R Board Authorization Date:September 25, 1996 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA Ti tted by: Reviewed by: 1 N- e9'—L/—Y6 I Construction Manager Date Engineering Manager Date Approy dby: Ad Form: r 9_-4, Dir ctor of Engineering Date GenerA Counsel Date Accepted by: ALBERT W.DAVIES,InNC. Contractor Date County Sanitation Districts " of Orange County,California P.O. Box 8127•10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 MINUTES OF FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE Wednesday, September 11, 1996, 5:30 P.M. A meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, Califomia was held on August 7, 1996 at 5:30 p.m., at the Districts'Administrative Offices. ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: Committee Directors Present: Staff Present: George Brown, Chair Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager John J. Collins, Joint Chair Judith A. Wilson, Assistant General Manager Jan Debay Ed Hodges, Director of General Services Admin. James Flora Gary Streed, Director of Finance John M. Gullixson Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications Wally Linn Mike White, Controller Thomas Saltarelli Marc Dubois, Purchasing Manager Roger R. Stanton, Vice Chair Christopher Dahl, Information Technology Manager William G. Steiner Frankie Woodside, Assistant Committee Secretary Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair Others Present: Committee Directors Absent : Russ Patton, Labor Consultant John C. Cox, Jr. (PJC) Dan Cassidy, Labor Consultant Burnie Dunlap Thomas Woodruff, General Counsel Other Directors Present: None APPOINTMENT OF A CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. PUBLIC COMMENTS No comments were made. Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee ' Page 2 September 11, 1996 - APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the draft minutes of the August 7, 1996 meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee. REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Chair had no report. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager asked that the Directors continue to familiarize themselves with the Strategic Plan by attending the Strategic Plan Workshop on Saturday, September 21. REPORT OF ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER -ADMINISTRATION The Assistant General Manager of Administration had no report. New employees Christopher Dahl, Information Technology Manager and Marc Dubois, Purchasing/Contract Manager were introduced. REPORT OF ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER - OPERATIONS The Assistant General Manager of Operations was not in attendance. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE Gary Streed reported on the Districts' daily COP rates. Since the agenda package was mailed, the COP rates have gone down. Rates traditionally go up at the end of the month and down after the beginning of the month. An internal survey of the Finance department was recently completed. Gary Streed will report the results at next month's meeting. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES The Director of Human Resources was not in attendance. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION The Director of General Services had no report. Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Page 3 September 11, 1996 REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNICATIONS The Director of Communications deferred, as the report would be included in agenda item FAHR9653. REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel had no report for open session. DISCUSSION ITEMS (Nos. 1-6) 1. FAHR9649: RECEIVE AND FILE TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF JULY 1996 (All Districts). RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of July 1996 and forward to the Joint Boards. 2. FAHR96-50: REPORT OF CONTRACTS/PURCHASING MANAGER RE ABC INVENTORY PROGRAM (All Districts). RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and file-information only. 3. FAHR96-51: ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE DISTRICTS' INVESTMENT POLICY (All Districts): Consideration of motion to revise the Districts' Investment Policy Statement, and recommend that the Joint Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No. 96-_to adopt the updated Investment Policy. COMMITTEE DISCUSSION: The Director of Finance reviewed the changes proposed in the staff report which was included in the agenda. The committee asked to have Callan Associates, our Investment Management Advisor, report on the pros and cons of allowing investments to extend beyond 5 years with their next quarterly report. The staff proposal was modified to provide that the monthly Treasurer's Report be distributed at the Committee meeting, in order to meet the 30 day availability required by the revised Government Code. RECOMMENDED ACTIONS 1) Receive and file this report; 2)Approve revisions to the Districts' Investment Policy as recommended in this report, as proposed by the Committee, and as depicted in the updated Investment Policy presented in staff report; and 3) Recommend that the Joint Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No. 96_ at their meeting of September 25, 1996. to approve the Districts' updated Investment Policy; repeal Resolution Nos. 95-14 and 95-15; and repeal Resolution No. 95-78, and incorporate its contents into Resolution No. 96- . Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee ' Page 4 September 11, 1995 4. FAHR96-52: ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 132 PROVIDING ADDITIONAL SERVICE CREDIT FOR RETIREMENT PURPOSES (All Districts): The Director of Human Resources, in conjunction with the FAHR Committee, recommends that the Directors adopt the Ordinance providing for two additional years of service credit to eligible Districts' employees who retire between January 1 and March 31, 1997, in accordance with the provisions of Government Code Section 31641.04. RECOMMENDED ACTION:Adopt Ordinance No. 132, an Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, providing eligible Districts' employees to receive two years additional service credit for retirement purposes. 5. FAHR96-53: RESULTS OF COMMUNICATIONS MINI AUDIT(All Districts): Staff Summary Report on the results of the July Communications Mini Audit and an update of the new and/or expanded programs to reach both internal and extemal audiences. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and file- information only. 6. FAHR96-54: PROPOSITION 218, RIGHT TO VOTE ON TAXES ACT (All Districts): The Chief Administrative Officer requests that the Boards go on record in opposition to Proposition 218 which would impose significant and expensive procedural requirements on the noticing of proposed extensions of, or increases to, user fees. The proposition also provides for the application of the voter initiative to user fees, which means that a voter initiative could force a roll-back or reduction in user fees which would have an adverse affect on the Districts' ability to borrow at low interest rates. COMMITTEE DISCUSSION: There was considerable committee discussion about the value and appropriateness of taking a public position on a ballot measure. The consensus was that we should participate in information gathering and disseminating sessions but not take an official position in opposition. RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the Districts not go on record opposing Proposition 218, but investigate methods to inform the public. CLOSED SESSION The Committee convened in closed session at 7,05 o.m., as authorized by Government Code Sections 54957.6, to discuss and consider the item specked under Closed Session as (a)(1) on the published Agenda. Confidential Minutes of the closed session held by the Committee have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Page 5 September 11, 1996 Committee Closed Meetings. No reportable action was taken re Agenda Item (a)(1). At 7:45 P.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session. OTHER BUSINESS. COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. FUTURE MEETING DATES The next Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, October 9, 1996. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 7:50 o.m. Submitted by: k rapkie Woodside Finance, Administration and Human Resources Assistant Committee Secretary Ic A.WFAHR9.96 AGENDA '^ ITEM � TRANSMITTAL sr MEETING DATE ` DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION (InOials of Odginalm) OMITS: 5-•. PDC: FAHR:9-11-96 ALL 2210,Gary Streed,ext 2500 EXEC: STEER: DMslen No.,Name,and Extension JT.egs:9-25-96 AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): j Agenda Wording: RECEIVE AND FILE TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF JULY 1996 (All Districts) Recommended Action(s): 1. Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of July 1996. CEQA REVIEW: Project is Exempt: NOT APPLICABLE DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC REM: Data Notice of Exemption Red: Negadn DeeleratIon Approved eo Fidel EIR Approved an_and Netke of Determin Pion Mad on BUDGET INFORMATION N1A CURRENTYEAR CURRENT YEAR- YEAR-TO4)ATE REVISED BUDGET TOTAL BUDGET: S BUDGET AMOUNT TOZATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL SOURCE: CORF JO DISTRICTS EXPENDITURES (raneurOe WaTnmmnl sclied le/une Xem: 4,4 ,�/�A h'1,4 y�A AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: Schedule/Line Item: AITIPROJECT COST INFORMATION ORIGINAL BID,PO, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED PROJECT CONTRACT FUNDS PREV. REQUESTED THIS AMOUNT AMOUNT APPROVED AR WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? No If YES,stale number: Permanent Limited Term REQUIRES explain in ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section CONCURRENCES: ATTACHMENTS TO AGENDA(List) To Committee: 1.Graph-Cash Investments 2.Monthly Monitoring Reports Signature Date Divi ' n Manager(zesignee) q �f L 1t I� To Jt. Bds.: . 1.Graph-Cash Investments ture Date 2.Monthly Monitoring Reports epartment Head (Or Designee) S ture Date Assistant General Manager(Or Designee) yailif:,Y p: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION(Background and/or Summary) Both Pacific Investment Management Co., PIMCO,and Mellon Trust began their professional external management of our funds in September 1995. In order to give the Directors an opportunilyto review the month-end reports available from PIMCO,and to avoid distribution at the meeting, reports from the prior month are included with the agenda. Immediate past-month reports are available from the Treasurer. Quarterly presentations are made by PIMCO and our third-party independent consultant, Callan Associates,when requested by the Committee. The Investment Policy adopted by the Joint Boards on May 24, 1995, includes reporting requirements as listed down the left most column of the PIMCO Monthly Report for the-Liquid Operating Monies"and for the'Long-Term Operating Monies.' All of the Investment Policy requirements are being complied with and performance to date exceeds the index rates. Historical cost and the current market values, "mark-to-market," are shown as estimated by both PIMCO and Mellon Trust. The slight differences are caused by differing assumptions regarding marketability at the estimate date. Attached are schedules showing the detail and summary for both the short-term and long-term portfolio investments. Balances- CSDOC July 31,1996.!. State of Calif.LAIF $ 3,229,090 Bank of America 471,512 PIMCO-Short-term Portfolio 52,388,846 PIMCO-Long-term Portfolio 281,541,877 District 11 GO Bond Fund 9,792 Debt Service Reserves @ Trustees 33.514.921 $ 137 ,156.03g GGS:Ic c: Department Head AGM-Administration AGM-Operations General Manager J:\WPDOC\FIN\CRANEtFPC.MTGIFAHR.961 EPT.AIT\TREAS.RPT Page 2 of 2 Revision: VIM September 11, 1996 CSDOC TOTAL CASH & INVESTMENTS 1995 - 1996 400 350 300 • zso 0 0 `0 200 00 0 150 i 100 50 0 July 31Aug.31 Sept.300ot 30Nov.30 Dec.31Jan.31 Feb'29Mar.31 Apr.30 May 31Juns 30July 31 l\W V W(�FINIC RANPfPC.MiGV.V 1R.6R5FSl./TTRFAS GRF MONTHLY REPORT COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ending July 31, 1996) Long Term Operating Monies 14.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: PIMCO $282,812,940 Mellon $283,303,766 Historical Cost: $287,463,392 14.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 2.5 Of Index: 2.3 14.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss) of I%Change: $7,070,324 14.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: (see attached schedule) 0% 14.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: NA 14.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: AAA 14.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0"/" 14.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" 14.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Portfolio Total Rate of Return: 1 Month: .37 3 Months: 1.31 12 Months: ---- Year-to-Date: .74 Index Total Rate of Return: .36 1 Month: C OFFICflWPW IMWIWCSWUICORIN.TIIILWPp MONTHLY REPORT COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING ((or the month ending July 31, 1996) Liquid Operating Monies 14.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: PIMCO $52,863,199 • Mellon $52,855,090 Historical Cost: $52,959,993 14.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: .07 Of Index: .25 14.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gairuloss)of 1%Change: $37,004 (.07%) 14.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: (see attached schedule) 0% 14.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 99% 14.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: AAA 14.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0% 14.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" 14.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Portfolio Total Rate of Return: 1 Month: .48 3 Months: 1.38 12 Months: Year-to-Date: 3.17 Index Total Rate of Return: 1 Month: .43 C':'UFFICEIWPWIMWP/NN.'NIA1C'OWIV.(jfLN.WP MSP075111 MELLON TRUST ' LIQUID OPER-PIMCO PORTFOLIO SOMMARY BY SECTOR BASE: USD 31-UUL-1996 NB1300 t OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CURE PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOBS ANNUAL INCO4E YIEW ------------------------------ ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- ------- CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS CASH 0.17 0.17 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 C@ CIAL PAPER - DISCOUNT 15,302,049.36 15,302,049.36 28.95% 0.00 0.00 0.00 FEDERAL, HOME WAN MOR]OAGB -LE 2,369,582.75 2,369,562.75 4.48% 0.00 0.00 0.00 FNMA ISSUES - LESS THU 1YR 10,548,720.10 10,546,720.10 19.96% 0.00 0.00 0.00 FED W WAN BW - LEM THIS IYR 9,066,105.20 9,066,185.20 17.15% 0.00 0.00 0.00 FEDERAL FARH CREDIT BANK - LES 5,476.560.97 5,476,560.97 10.36% 0.00 0.00 0.00 MDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNTS 151,719.00 151,719.00 0.29t 0.00 5,689.46 3.75 CANADIAN GOVERNMENT SHORT TERN 4,969,578.25 4,869,578.25 9.21t 0.00 0.00 0.00 ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- ------- TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 47,784,395.00 47,764,395.80 90.41% 0.00 5,689.46 0.01 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES BANKING 6 FINANCE 2,050,400.00 2,000,000.00 3.79% -50,400.00 180,000.00 9.00 INDUSTRIAL 2,554,050.00 2.500,000.00 4.73% -54,050.00 213,750.00 6.55 ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- ------- TOTAL FIXED INCME SECURITIES 4,604.450.00 4,500,000.00 9.51% -104,450.00 393,750.00 9.75 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 570.694.54 S70,694.54 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- ------- TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 570,694.54 570,694.54 2.08% 0.00 0.00 0.00 ..vvv vO9v) s NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 52,959,540.34 52,855,090.34 100.00% Deaea�-104 450.00 aQOeO-399, eOe 439.46 0.76 MSF07SIll MI ON TRUST LIQUID OPER-PINCO PORTFOLIO DETAIL BY SECTOR BASE: USD 31-.KB.-1996 I031100 MARKET t OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CURS SNARES/PAR SECURITY DESCRIPTION PRICE MARRST VALUE TOTAL COST GAIN/Loss ANNUAL INCOME YLO --------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS CASH D CASH 1.000 0.17 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.00 D.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBTOTAL CASH 0.17 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 �CIAL PAPER - DISCOUNT 500,000 AMERICAN TEL 6 TL DISC 98.775 493,875.00 0.93 493,875.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 05/16/1996 1,000,000 AMERICAN TEL 6 TL DISC 98.469 1,772,437.50 3.35 1,702,437.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 O8/09/1996 1,100,000 CANADIAN WHEAT BD DISC 90.633 1,084,967.59 2.05 1,084,967.59 0.00 O.DO 0.00 08/09/1996 2,IOO,ODO COMWLTH BK AUST A DISC 98.653 2,071,717.67 3.92 2,071,717.67 0.00 O.DO 0.00 08/20/1996 300,000 ELECTRIC FRANCS DISC 96.660 296,003.58 0.56 296,003.58 0.00 0.00 U.OD O8/23/1996 1,700,000 FORD M CR CO DISC 98.580 1,675,960.48 3.17 1,675,960.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 08/29/1996 500,000 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 99.567 497,637.06 0.94 497,937.06 0.00 0.00 DAD 08/01/1996 1,100,000 NEWLITT PACKARD DISC 98.673 1,085,402.08 2.05 1,085,402.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 O8/20/1996 600,000 Km INTL FIN INC DISC 98.601 591,609.34 1.12 591.608.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 08/06/1596 1,100,000 KFW INTL FIN INC DISC 99.123 1,090,355.14 2.06 1,090,355.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 09/19/1996 1,700,000 LILLY ELI 6 CO DISC 96.670 1,677,389.06 3.17 1.677,389.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 10/21/1996 500,000 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 99.544 497,718.06 0.94 497,718.06 0.00 0.00 D.00 08/23/1996 2,500,000 ONTARIO HYDRO DISC 96.675 2,466,877.78 4.67 2,466,877.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 09/09/1996 ---------------------------------------" ------------------- SUBTOTAL co 9 cIAL PAPER - DISCOUNT 15,302,049.36 26.95 15,302,049.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 FEDERAL NOW LOAN NORTOAOE -LESS THAN 1 YR 2,100,000 FEDERAL HOME LN MIG C1aRP DISC 96.644 2,071,519.75 3.92 2,071,518.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 MAT 09/05/1996 300,000 FEDERAL ROM LN NTG CORP DISC 99.355 298,064.00 0.56 298,064.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MAT 09/12/1996 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBTOTAL FEDERAL HOME WAN MORTGAGE 2,369,SS2.75 4.48 2,369,SS2.75 0.00 0.00 D.00 FT04A ISSUES - LESS TM In 700,000 FED HOME LN NTG CORP DISC SYS 99.310 695,270.10 1.32 695,17O.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 08/12/1996 OCSFOT5111 MELWN TRUST LIQUID OPSR-PIMCO PORTFOLIO DETAIL BY SECTOR WE: USD 31-J -1996 TD11300 MARKET k OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CURR SHARES/PAR SECURITY DESCRIPTION PRICE MARKET VAIDE TOTAL COST GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YLD _______________ --------__________________________ _____- ________---___---____------___-____----______--- 10,000,000 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DISC 96.536 9,853,550.00 18.64 9,853,550.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 08/23/1996 _____________________________________________________________________________ SUBTOTAL FTMA ISSUES - LESS THN 1YR 10,548,720.10 19.96 10,548,720.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 FED HM LOAN BNK - LESS INS IYR 3,100,OOD FEDERAL MCME IN BK CONS DISC 98.435 3,051,473.81 5.77 3,051,473.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 MAT 08/12/1996 3,100,ODO FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 98.698 3,059,622.50 5.79 3,059,622.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 MAT O8/14/1996 500,000 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 97.662 488,311.11 0.92 488,311.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 MATURES 11/12/1996 2,500,000 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 98.671 2,466,077.78 4.67 2,466,I77.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 MAT 08/28/1996 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBTOTAL FED FM LOAN BNK - LESS THN 9,066,185.20 17.15 9,066,105.20 O.OD O.OD 0.00 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK - LESS THAN 1 YEAR 2,500,000 FED FARM CA BK CONS DISC NIS 99.550 2,488,740.97 4.71 2,488,740.97 0.00 0.00 0.00 MAT 08/15/1996 3,000,000 FED FARM CA BK CONS DISC NTS 99.594 2,987,820.00 5.65 2,987,920.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MAT O8/21/1996 _____________________________________________________________________________ SUBTOTAL FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK - 5,476,560.97 10.36 5,476,560.97 0,00 0.00 0.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNTS 151.119 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOVNI- 100.000 151,719.00 0.29 151,719.00 0.00 5,669.46 3.75 PUBLIC II ____-_ ---------------------------------------------- SUBTOTAL BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUN 151,719.00 0.29 151,719.00 0.00 5,689.46 3.75 CANADIAN GOVERNMENT SHORT TERM 1,2DO,000 CANADA GOUT DISC 99.511 1,194,137.00 2.26 1,194,137.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 DB/12/1996 3,700,OOD CANADA GOVT DISC 99.336 3,675,441.25 6.95 3,675,441.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 O8/15/1996 ________________________________________________________________ SUBTOTAL CANADIAN GOVERNMENT SHORT I 4,869,579.25 9.21 4,969,ST8.25 D.00 0.00 0.00 _____________________________________________________________________________ TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 40,784,395.90 90.41 47,784,395.80 0.00 5,689.46 0.01 IIXED INCOME SECURITIES BANKING 6 FINANCE 2,000,000 SEARS DC CORP MIN SEE II 100.000 2,000,000.00 3.78 2,050,400.00 -50,400.00 180,000.00 9.00 9.000% DB/01/1996 DD 08/01/91 _____________________________________________________________________________ OCSF075111 MELLON TRUST LIQUID OPER-PIMCO PORTFOLIO DETAIL BY SECTOR BASE: USD 31-JUL-1996 RB1100 MARKET t OP UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CURE SNARES/PAR SECURITY DESCRIPTION PRICE MARKET VALUE TOTAL COST GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YLD --------------- ----------------------------------------------------•-------------------_------__----------------------------------- SUBTOTAL RANKING A FINANCE 2,000,000.00 3.78 2,050,400.00 -50.400.00 180,000.00 9.00 INDUSTRIAL 2,500,000 SEARS ROEBUCK A CO NT 200.000 2,500,000.00 4.73 2,554,050.00 -54,050.00 213,750.00 8.55 B.SSOk O8/01/1996 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBTOTAL INDUSTRIAL 2,500,000.00 4.73 2,554,050.00 -54,050.00 213.750.00 8.55 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- TUTAL FIXED INCCPIE SECURITIES 4,500,000.00 8.51 4.604,450.00 -104,450.00 393.750.00 8.75 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 0 INTEREST RECEIVABLE 1.000 570,694.54 1.09 570,694.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 . -------------•--------------------------------------------------------------- SUBTOTAL PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 570,694.54 1.08 570,694.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 570,694.54 1.08 570,694.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 ............................................................................. NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 52,855,090.34 100.00 52,959,540.34 -104,450.00 399,439.46 0.76 P.. I �L X73 FO752]] M6LION TRUST '.ONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PORTFOLIO SUMMARY BY SECTOR BABE: DID ' 31.OUL-1996 HB1300 t OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CURB PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALOR TOTAL GAIN/Loss ANNUAL INCOME YIELD .................. .................. ........ ................. ................ ....... :ASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS CASH 0.65 0.65 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 COA4ERCIAL PAPER - DISCOUNT 11,273,902.20 11,273,902.20 3.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 TREASURY BILLS - LESS THN 1YR 4,719,669.45 4,719,669.45 1.67% 0.00 0.00 0.00 MDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNTS 171,302.00 171,302.00 0.06% 0.00 6,423.83 3.75 CANADIAN GOVERNMENT SHORT TERM 497,644.44 497,644.44 0.181 0.00 0.00 0.00 __________________ __________________ ________ _____________ _ ________________ _______ TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 16,562,518.D4 16,562,518.74 5.85% 0.00 6,423.63 0.04 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S. GOVERNMENTS 91,326,196.55 89,590,765.00 31.62% -1,735,431.65 6,126,875.00 6.84 V.S. AGENCIES 334,518,625.00 132,475,374.00 46.70 .2,043.251.00 0,700,040.00 6.57 BANKING 6 FINANCE 27,627,436.61 27,548,327.45 9.72t -79,209.16 1,905,397.00 6.92 INDUSTRIAL 11,507,100.00 11,172,210.00 3.90 -334,090.00 908,500.00 8.85 __________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ _______ TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 264,979,358.46 260,786,676.45 92.05% -4,192,682.01 17,720,612.00 6.30 MTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 5,954,570.92 5,954,570.92 2.20% 0.00 0.00 0.00 .................. .................. ........ ................. ................ ....... TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 5,954,570.92 5,954,570.92 2.IOt 0.00 0.00 0.00 vvv1 s NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 287,496,446.13 283,303,766.12 100.00% vsOO •••-4,192,6B2.01 17,727,235.83 6.2E UCSF075222 MELLON TRUST LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PORTFOLIO DETAIL BY SECTOR BASE: USD 31-JUL-1996 HB1300 MARKET t OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CURR SNARES/PAR SECURITY DESCRIPTION PRICE MARKET VALUE TOTAL COST GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YLD --------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -ASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS CASH 0 CASH 1.000 0.65 0.00 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBTOTAL CASH 0.65 0.00 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 COBAtERCIAL PAPER - DISCOUNT 5,800,OOD WERICAN TEL R TL DISC 98.656 5,722,035.11 2.02 5,722,035.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 OB/22/1996 900,000 AMERITECH CORP DISC 99.660 987,940.50 0.31 887,940.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 10/28/1996 3,1OD,000 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 99.567 3,086,589.92 1.09 3,086,589.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 08/01/1996 1,300,000 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 96.336 1,278,373.06 0.45 1,208,373.06 O.OD 0.00 0.00 08/06/1996 200,000 PROCTER 6 GAMBLE DISC 99.482 198,963.61 0.07 198,963.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 08/05/1996 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUEYOTAL CCKM ERCIAL PAPER - DISCOUNT 11,173,902.20 3.94 11,173,902.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 TREASURY BILLS - LESS THN 1YR 5,000,000 U S TREASURY BILLS 94.393 4,719,669.45 1.67 4,719,669.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 06/26/1997 DO 06/27/96 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBTOTAL TREASURY BILLS - LESS THN 1 4,719,669.45 1.67 4,719,669.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNTS 171,302 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 100.000 171,302.00 0.06 171,302.00 0.00 6,423.83 3.75 PUBLIC II ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBTOTAL MDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUN 171,302.00 0.06 171,302.00 0.00 6,423.83 3.75 CANADIAN GOVeRM4EM SHORT TERM 500,000 CANADIAN WHEAT BD DISC 99.529 497,644.44 0.18 497,644.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 08/20/1996 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBTOTAL CANADIMI GOVERNMENT SHORT T 497,644.44 0.18 497,644.44 0.00 0.00 O.DO ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 16,562,51B.74 5.85 16,562,518.74 0.00 6,423.83 0.04 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S. GOVERNMENTS 75,500,000 U 5 TREASURY NOTES 101.937 76,962,435.00 27.17 78,223,610.72 -1,261,183.72 5,379,375.00 6.99 07.125% 09/30/1999 DO 09/30/94 13,000,000 U S TREASURY NOTES 97.141 12,628,330.00 4.46 13,102,570.13 -474,248.13 747,500.00 5.92 Page 1 OCSF075222 MELLON TRUST WNG TERM OPER-PIMCO PORTFOLIO DETAIL BY SECTOR BASE: USD ' 31-JUL-1996 11100 MARKET t OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CORR SHARES/PAR SECURITY DESCRIPTION PRICE MARKET VALVE TOTAL COST GAIN/WSS ANNUAL INCOME YLD ---""--------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OS.750t 10/31/2000 DO 10/31/95 ............__.....____-------------__-------------___............__.... SUBTOTAL U.S. GOVERNMENTS 89,590,765.00 31.62 91,326,196.85 -1,735,431.85 6,126,875.00 6.84 U.S. AGENCIES 10.000,000 FED NAIL MTG ASSN MTN 95.484 9,548,400.00 3.37 9,593,750.00 -45,350.00 564,000.00 5.91 5.640% 02/20/2001 DO 02/20/96 39,600,000 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS SOS 98.594 39,043,224.00 13.79 39,990,500.00 -847,276.00 2,570,040.00 6.58 6.490% 09/13/2000 DO 09/13/95 15,000,000 FEDERAL HCME W MTG CORP DEES 96.734 14,510,100.00 5.22 14,554,667.50 -44,587.50 898,500.00 6.19 5.990t 03/06/2001 DO 03/06/96 25,000,000 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG DEB 99.165 24,796,250.00 9.75 25,000,000.00 -203,750.00 1,680,000.00 6.76 6.720% 10/02/2000 DD 10/02/95 25.000,000 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DEB 99.672 24,919,000.00 8.90 25,351,562.50 -433,562.50 1,712,500.00 6.87 6.8507 05/26/2000 DO 05/26/95 20,000,ODO FEDERAL WAL MIG ASSN 98.297 19,659,400.00 6.94 20,128,125.00 -465,725.00 1,275,000.00 6.49 6.37St 10/13/2000 DO 10/10/95 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBTOTAL V.S. AGENCIES 132,475,374.00 46.76 134,518,625.00 -2,043,251.00 8.700,040.00 6.57 BANKING 6 PINANCB 1,500,000 CHRYSLER FINL MTV TR K 00201 100.901 1,513,515.00 0.53 1,534,950.00 -21,435.00 122,400.00 8.09 8.160% 01/31/1997 DO 01/11/95 465,000 CHRYSLER FINL MTV TR R 00224 100.953 469,431.45 0.17 475,972.61 -6,541.16 37,572.00 8.00 8.080% 01/31/1997 DO 01/31/95 1,SOO,000 CHRYSLER FINL MTN TR 8 00258 100.772 2,511,580.00 0.53 1,522,240.00 -10,560.00 110,700.00 7.32 7.380% 03/17/1997 DD 03/03/95 2,900,000 CHRYSLER FINL MTN TR R 00306 101.305 2,937.845.00 1.04 2,952,896.00 -15,051.00 210,830.00 7.18 7.270% 04/13/1998 DO 04/13/95 1,000,000 CHRYSLER FINL MTN TR R 00335 99.451 994,510.00 0.35 993,160.00 1,350.00 62.600.00 6.29 6.260t 07/20/1996 DD 07/18/95 7,100,000 FORD MOTOR CR MIN TR 4 00177 100.062 7,104,402.00 2.51 6,999,748.00 104,654.00 402,570.00 5.67 VAR/RT 03/30/1999 00 03/30/94 4,000,000 FORD MW CA WN TRANCHE RTR 96 99.647 3,993,800.00 1.41 3,970,480.00 23,400.00 243,200.00 6.09 MW/RT 11/09/1998 DD 11/08/93 3,000,000 G M A C MED TERM NTS 205.290 3,158,700.00 1.11 3,227,070.00 -68,370.00 258,750,00 8.19 8.625% 1/10/2000 DO 1/10/95 3,700,000 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP MTN TR00324 103.792 3,840,304.00 1.36 3,911,640.00 -71,336.00 309,875.00 8.07 8.375% 02/03/1999 DO 0/03/95 1,000,000 LEHMAN BROS INC SR SUB NIS 100.474 1,004,740.00 0.35 1,007,520.00 -2,780.00 70,000.00 6.97 7.000t 5/15/1997 DD 5/27/94 1,000,000 SEARS ROEBUCK MTN 9 TR 00491 101.942 1,019,420.00 0.36 1,031,860.00 -12,440.00 76,900.00 7.54 7.690% 02/27/1998 DO 02/28/9S ........................... ------------------------------------------------- SUBTOTAL BANKING B FINANCE 27,548,327.45 9.72 27,627,436.61 -79,109.16 1,905,397.00 6.92 INDUSTRIAL 1,500,000 CHRYSLER CORP DEB 103.828 1,557,420.00 0.55 1,603,320.00 -45,900.00 156,000.00 10.02 Page 2 OCSF075222 MELLON TRUST LOW TERM OPER-PIHCO PORTFOLIO DETAIL BY SECTOR BASE: ORD 31-UUI.-1996 IDf1100 MARKET i OF UNREALIZED SSTIMATSD CURB SNARES/PAR SECURITY DESCRIPTION PRICE MARKET VAGUE TOTAL COST GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YLD _______________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 10.400% 08/01/1999 9,000,000 PHILIP MORRIS COS NT 106.831 9,614,790.00 3.39 9,903,700.00 -288,990.00 832,500.00 6.66 9.250% 02/15/2000 _____________________________________________________________________________ SUBTOTAL INDUSTRIAL 11,172,210.00 3.94 11,507,100.00 -334,890.00 968,500.00 6.65 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 260,786,676.45 92.05 264,979,358.46 -4,192,682.01 17,720,012.00 6.80 TTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES D INTEREST RECEIVABLE 1.000 5,954,570.92 2.10 5,954,570.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 ___________________________________ __---_-__---_-________-__-____ SUBTOTAL PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 5,954,570.92 2.10 5,954,570.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 _____________________________________________________________________________ TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 5,954,570.92 2.10 5,954,570.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 283, ' �303 766.21 100.00 287,496,448.12 -4,192,682.01.............................. 0v 17,727,235.836n26 Page 3 a _ 1 S AGEN n"oNmE ITEMDA a ooN �, TRANSMITTAL - >90.43715CUSS1tlN 's MEETING DATE DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION (Inelals of Odglnator) OMITS: PDC: Bw FAHR:9M 1/96All 2210,Steve Kozak eXt.25D4 EXEC: STEER: Dldsion No.,Name,and Edenslon JT.BDs:925/98 AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Agenda Wording: ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE DISTRICTS' INVESTMENT POLICY(All Districts): Consideration of motion to revise the Districts'Investment Policy Statement,and recommend that the Joint Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No.96-nc to adopt the updated Investment Policy. Recommended Action(s): 1. Receive and file this report. 2. Approve revisions to the Districts'Investment Policy as recommended in this report,as proposed by the Committee and as depicted in the updated Investment Policy presented in staff report. 3. Recommend that the Joint Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No.96-_at their meeting of September 25, 1996, to approve the Districts'updated Investment Policy; repeal Resolution Nos. 95-14 and 95-15;and repeal Resolution No.95-78,and incorporate its contents Into Resolution No.96-_. CEOA REVIEW: Projed Is Exempt: NOTAPPLICABLE DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC REM: Date Notice of Exemption Filed: Negative Declaration Approved on Final EIR Approved on_and Notice of Detemnlnallon filed on_ May 24, 1995 BUDGET INFORMATION CURRENTYEAR CURRENT YEAR- YEAR-TO4DATE REVISED BUDGET TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.: $ BUDGETAMOUNT TO-0ATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL SOURCE: CORF JO DISTRICTS EXPENDITURES R�ieuepnq..Tnedmel Scheddef.m Item: NA NA NA NA AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: SchedukiLlne Item: AITIPROJECT COST INFORMATION ORIGINAL BID,PO, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED PROJECT CONTRACT FUNDS PREV. REQUESTED THIS AMOUNT AMOUNT APPROVED AIT NA NA NA NA WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? YES If YES,sWlenumbec Permanent nnim Term If YES,e lam in ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section CONCURRENCES: ATTACHMENTS TO AGENDA(List) 17 5EPT96 To Committee: Staff Report 2.. Resolution No. 96-nc -dignatu Date DM on Me Design e) To Jt. Bds.: 1. Staff Report qg—naturej Date Department Head(Or Designee) 2. Resolution Na.96-nr Signatur t en Date Assistaneral Manager(Or Designee) OATS COMM. PDC COMM. FAHR COMM. JOINT BOARDS Meeting Dater Approved. Amended: Fcnvardedto* ADDmONAL INFORMATION(Background and/or Summary) First Annual review of the Districts' Investment Policy, and recommendation to the Joint Boards for adoption of a Resolution for approval of Districts' updated Investment Policy. svk c: Department Head AGM-Administration AGM-Operations General Manager General Counsel J:1W PD0CIFINICRANEIFPC.MTGVAHR.961SEPT.AITIFAHR96S1 Page 2 of 2 Revision'. 64M n September 11, 1996 p.--.-- Revised 9-12-95 STAFF REPORT Annual Review of the Districts' Investment Policy Summary The Districts' current Investment Policy was reviewed and approved by the Finance, Administration & Human Resources Committee (FAHR) on May 10, 1995, and adopted by the Joint Boards on May 24, 1995. On September 7, 1995, final professional services agreements were signed, the Districts' Treasury Bill investments matured and funds were wired to Mellon Trust for investment by PIMCO, the Districts' external Money Manager. The Districts' Investment Policy governs PIMCO's investment activities on behalf of the Districts. The Investment Policy, attached, includes the requirement that the Districts shall review its Investment Policy annually(Sections 1.2 and 16.1). This staff report presents the first Annual Review of the Districts' Investment Policy to the Committee for Consideration in your capacity as the oversight committee for the Investment Policy(Section 16.2). This review includes: 1. Revisions to the Investment Policy as required by the Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB), and amendments to the California Government Code; 2. Revisions to the Investment Policy as recommended by the Municipal Treasurers' Association of the United States & Canada (MTA); 3. Revisions to the Investment Policy as requested by PIMCO, the Districts' External Investment Advisor; and 4. Recommendations regarding the resolution of several administrative matters. Revisions Required by GASB and the Government Code The following discussion highlights the changes in investment practices that are required of local agencies as a result of the recent revisions in investment laws made by GASB and the California Government Code. Because the Districts' original 1995 Investment Policy was written to be both conservative and prudent in nature, 4 anticipated some of the changes that are now required of all local governments in California. As such, the Districts' Investment Policy is largely in compliance with the new investment laws and only a few amendments are necessary. The table in Attachment "1," summarizes the new reporting requirements; provides status information on the Districts' implementation of the new requirements; and recommends revisions to the Investment Policy, where appropriate. A copy of the Districts' updated Investment Policy is also presented in Attachment"2," and denotes the recommended revisions for adoption (see redlined text). CS DOC • P.O.Box 8 12 7 • Foontai n Val lay,CA 92728-8127 0 (714)962-2411 9 FAHR 96-51 Page 2 September 11, 1996 GASB/Government Code Changes Requiring No Change to Investment Policy Earlier this year, the Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB), which sets governmental accounting standards, followed the lead of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), which sets business accounting standards, in announcing its decision that state and local governments should report their investments at"fair," or market values. Section 15.1.1 of the Districts' Investment Policy currently requires that the value of the Districts' portfolio be marked-to-market each month. Therefore, no change is required. The California Government Code was recently amended to include the provisions of Senate Bills 564 and 866, which pertain to local agency investments (excluding bond proceeds). The proceeds of the Districts' capital projects financing program are invested in accordance with the provisions of their specific bond covenants and indentures, as noted in Section 2.0 of the Districts' Investment Policy. First, all local government entities must adopt formal investment policies and must annually review and re-adopt policies at a public meeting. The Districts' original 1995 Investment Policy included this requirement. The new laws establish that local agency investment policy objectives must, in priority order, be safety, liquidity, and then yield; and that local agency investment officials are considered trustees and fiduciaries subject to defined prudent investment standards. The Districts' original 1995 Investment Policy included these requirements, as well as a section on Ethics and Conflicts of Interest which applies to the Districts' officers and employees involved in the investment process. The governing bodies of local governments must now receive investment reports at least quarterly, and may require them monthly. The new law specifies what must appear in these reports, including the type of investment, issue maturity, market value of the portfolio, and the source of the valuation. The Districts' original 1995 Investment Policy included these requirements. The new laws limit investment in reverse repurchase agreements ("reverse repos")to 20% of a local agency's portfolio, and contain outright prohibitions on inverse floaters, range notes, and interest-only strips. The Districts' original 1995 Investment Policy included the limitation, in Section 8.13.1, that no more than 20% of the Districts' portfolio shall be invested in reverse repurchase agreements. Inverse floaters, range notes, and interest-only strips are not permitted investments under the Districts' Investment Policy. It should be noted that, with regard to reverse repos, the Districts' original 1995 Investment Policy limits their maximum maturity to 90 days, unless otherwise specifically authorized by the Districts' Board of Directors; and further stipulates that the reverse repos shall mature on the exact date of a known cash flow which will be unconditionally available to repay the maturing reverse repo ("matched"); and finally that reverse repo proceeds shall be used solely to supplement liquidity, and shall not be used to speculate on market movements. Thus, the Districts' Investment Policy is somewhat more restrictive and conservative than required by Government Code. FAHR 96-51 Page 3 September 11, 1996 For protection of local agency funds, the new laws require that all securities must be delivered via book entry, physical delivery, or via a third party safekeeping custodial agreement. The Districts' original 1995 Investment Policy included requirements for all securities transactions to be conducted on a delivery-versus-payment basis (DVP), and that all securities will be held by a third-party custodian. Mellon Trust provides these services to the Districts. Government Code Changes Requiring Revisions to the Investment Policv The new code revisions require that reports must indicate that investments are in compliance with the adopted policies of the local agency, or identify areas of non-compliance. Although the Districts' monthly reports currently include this practice under Section 15.1.8 of the 1995 Investment Policy, a clarification is proposed to this section for more precise compliance with the new laws. Specifically, the current wording of Section 15.1.8 requires that investment reports include a listing of any transactions or holdings which do not comply with the Districts' Investment Policy or with the California Government Code. The clarification would add a phrase to state that all investments are in compliance with the Districts' Investment Policy and the California Government Code. Reports must also state the ability of the local agency to meet the next six (6) months of cash flow requirements. If the agency is not able to meet its cash flow demands, the report must state the reasons for the shortfall. New Section 15.1.10 is recommended for addition to the Districts' Investment Policy to comply with this requirement. The Quarterly Investment Report for the quarter ended June 30, 1996 contained this statement. The new Code revisions require that reports be available within 30 days of the end of the period. The Districts' current reporting cycle involves completion and submittal of monthly and quarterly investment reports to the Treasurer within 30 days following month or quarter end. Reports from PIMCO and Mellon are available in the second week of each month. The Treasurer reviews the reports and forwards them to the FAHR Committee the following month as the mail- out requirement (first week of each month)for the monthly FAHR Committee meetings arrives before the reports are available. If the FAHR Committee is comfortable receiving the reports on the day of their meeting, rather than in the advanced mailed package, the Joint Boards would be able to review the reports within the 30-day time frame. An alternate solution, however, that would allow the Committee full advance review of reports is to note that the reports are on file with the Treasurer and available upon request for review within the 30-day time frame. Apa1f'n6ddffirWdffMft addition of theYo0oJring phrase to Section 15.1 of the Investment Polyd� meet both goals of adequate time for Committee review and full Code compliance "these orts shall be on file with the Treasurer and available for review within 30 days of the end of ontbtcptarter .. .. 8M FAHR 96-51 Page 4 September 11, 1996 Revisions Recommended by the Municipal Treasurers' Association US & Canada Staff consulted with the Municipal Treasurers' Association of the United States & Canada (MTA) for comments on the Districts' Investment Policy, in preparation for submittal of the updated Policy to MTA for consideration under MTA's Certification of Excellence program. Most of the comments received from the MTA involved increasing the level of elaboration and detail in various sections of the Districts' Investment Policy. The MTA also recommended that the Policy contain separate sections covering securities collateralization and maturity topics. Although the 1995 Investment Policy covered these topics, staff recommends the addition of Section 9.0, Collaleralization, and Section 12.0, Maximum Maturities, to the updated Policy. Finally, the MTA recommended that the Policy should specifically require that all Repurchase and Reverse Repurchase Agreements be the subject of a Master Repurchase Agreement between the Districts and the investment provider. Staff recommends the addition of Sections 8.12.2 and 8.13.5, to address this comment. Amendments to the Investment Policy Requested by PIMCO Consistent with Section 1.2 of the Investment Policy, which states that the Districts shall review its Investment Policy annually, and may change its policies as its investment objectives change, staff reviewed several investment guideline proposals from PIMCO. The following is a brief discussion of PIMCO's recommendations to revise the Investment Policy. 1. Delete Lona-Term Portfolio 5-Year Maximum Maturity Constraint PIMCO proposes that they be allowed to operate the Long-Term Operating Fund without a maximum maturity constraint. This would delete the maturity requirement in Section 12.2.1 of the Investment Policy, which reads: "The maximum final stated maturity of individual securities in the Long-Term Operating Monies account portfolio shall be five (5)years from the date of purchase, unless otherwise authorized by the Districts' Board of Directors." PIMCO states that the five-year maximum maturity does not allow investments in the mortgage sector of the bond market, and impairs their ability to utilize yield curve strategy to maximize earnings. Staff Response Staff does not recommend approval of this recommendation. The Investment Policy currently allows investment in the mortgage sector of the fixed income market through collateralized mortgage obligations issued by the U.S. Government (Section 8.11). Should a specific need or opportunity arise, Section 12.2.1 currently provides PIMCO with the ability to recommend specific securities with maturities greater than five (5)years for Board approval. The maximum maturity provisions of the Districts' Investment Policy are in compliance with the requirements of the Government Code. FAHR 96-51 Page 5 September 11, 1996 2. Allow Direct Investment in Foreign Bonds and Futures PIMCO states that allowing investments in foreign bonds and futures should add return without increasing volatility. It should be noted that the Districts' Investment Policy currently provides thirteen categories of permitted investments. Foreign bonds and futures are not among the permitted investments. Further, the Government Code does not permit investment of public funds in foreign bonds. Staff Response Staff does not recommend approval of this recommendation, given the absence of specific investment authority, the continuing uncertainties in the foreign and futures markets, and the numerous permitted investment opportunities that are currently to PIMCO under the Districts' Investment Policy. 3. Allow Investments in Securities with Lower Credit Quality PIMCO states that lower credit quality issues have outperformed those with higher ratings. While this is a correct statement, it should be noted that this is the case because lower credit quality issues represent a higher investment risk; and higher risks produce higher Yields. Staff Response Staff does not recommend approval of this recommendation. In that the Districts' Investment Policy objectives are safety, liquidity, and then yield, as required by the Government Code, lower credit quality securities would increase the market risk of the Districts' investment portfolios. The current Investment Policy allows investments to be rated as low as "A-," except for Collateralized Mortgage Obligations (CMOs), which must be rated "AAA.". 4. Extend the Duration for the Short-term Liquid Operating Fund Beyond 90 Days PIMCO states that because the short-term end of the yield curve lends to be steep, an increase in the average maturity(or duration) of the Short-Tenn portfolio can produce increased returns without significantly increasing market risk. For example, the current yield for a 90-day Treasury is 5.25%, while a 180-day Treasury is yielding 5.47%; an increase in return of 22 basis points, with no change in the type of investment, or reduction in credit quality. Staff Response Staff recommends approval of an extension of the duration from 90 to 180 days. The Districts' Investment Policy currently allows the maximum final stated maturity of individual securities in the Short-Term Liquid Operating Fund to be twelve (12) months from the date of purchase (Section 12.1.1), and the majority of investments selected by PIMCO for the Short-Tenn portfolio are U.S. Government securities and prime-rated ("A1/P1") commercial paper with maximum maturities of 180 days. FAHR 96-51 Page 6 September 11, 1996 As the Committee considers PIMCO's proposed revisions to the Districts' Investment Policy, it is important to note that in adopting the Districts' 1995 Investment Policy, the Joint Boards of Directors adopted a statement which is a comprehensive declaration of policy, scope of investments, and granting of authorizations and requirements for implementation. Sections 1.0 and 4.0 of the Investment Policy establish a clear understanding for the Joint Boards, Districts' management, responsible employees, and third parties of the objectives, policies, and guidelines for the investment of the Districts' idle and surplus funds, consistent with the safekeeping of public funds, and prudent financial management. Administrative Matters A number of housekeeping items related to the Investment Policy require attention. A brief description of these clean-up items follows. • Resolution Adootino Updated Investment Policy: A new Resolution is required for adoption of the Districts' updated Investment Policy by the Joint Boards on September 25, 1996. Resolution No 96-xx is presented as Appendix"B" to the attached Investment Policy. • Attendance of PIMCO at Quarterly Meetinos: In Section 15.2 of the Districts' original 1995 Investment Policy, PIMCO is reclured to meet quarterly with the FAHR Committee. Because mandatory meetings may not always be necessary, to control costs, and to increase the flexibility of the FAHR Committee, staff recommends that the following sentence be added to Section 15.2: "External investment advisers may be required to attend said meetings at the discretion of the Chairman of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee." • Repeal of Resolution Nos. 95-14 and 95-15: Resolution Nos. 95-14 and 95-15 were adopted by the Joint Boards on February 8, 1995. These Resolutions approved interim investment policies following the Orange County bankruptcy, and before the Districts' permanent Investment Policy was developed and adopted by the Joint Boards on May 24, 1995. While the Boards' adopton of the permanent Investment Policy effectively superseded the earlier actions, staff recommends that Resolution Nos. 95-14 and 95.15 be formally repealed so that the potential for possibly conflicting Resolutions is eliminated. Repeal of these Resolutions can be incorporated into the Resolution that is required for adoption of the Districts' updated Investment Policy. • Consolidation of Benchmark Resolution: Resolution No. 95-78, adopted by the Joint Boards on July 26, 1995, approved investment performance benchmarks for the Districts' short-tern and long-term portfolios. To reduce the number of outstanding Resolutions for the investment program, staff recommends that Resolution No. 95-78 be repealed, and that its contents be incorporated into the new Resolution that is required for adoption of the Districts' updated Investment Policy. FAHR 96-51 Page 7 September 11, 1996 Ongoing Monitoring Program Staff continues to monitor pending legislative and regulatory proposals in the public finance area for their potential impact on the Districts' financial programs. For example, Be 1381 proposes additional changes to the California Government Code regarding local agency investments in money market funds. At the present time, SB 1381 remains in the Senate Local Government Committee. Staff will continue to keep the Committee informed of the status of this and other proposals as they may develop. Staff Recommendations Staff recommends that the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee adopt a motion to: 1. Receive and file this report. 2. Approve revisions to the Districts' Investment Policy as recommended in this report, as proposed by the Committee and as depicted in the updated Investment Policy presented in Attachment"2"to this report. 3. Recommend that the Joint Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No. 96-_ at their meeting of September 25, 1996, which would approve the Districts' updated Investment Policy; repeal Resolution Nos. 95-14 and 95-15; and repeal Resolution No. 95-78, and incorporate its contents into Resolution No. 96-_ SKllc J:\W PDOC\FIN\CRANE\FPC.MTGFAHR,96%STAFFRPT.96\SRFAHR96.51 ATTACHMENT "1" INVESTMENT PROGRAM REPORTING REQUIREMENTS SEPTEMBER 1996 CODE CHANGES IMPLEMENTATION INVESTMENT POLICY REVISIONS Annual review of Investment Policy at a public meeting. E dating-Section 1.2 and 16.1 None Investment policy objectives must be safety,liquidity and Frieling-Section 4.0 None yield. Prudent person investment standard. Existing-Section 3.0 None Quarterly and/or monthly investment reports. Eristing-Monthly reports are required,Section 15.1. None Eriating-Quarterly reports are currently presented to Add word'quarteW to Section 15.1. FAHR. Add the following phrase to Section 15.1: 'These Completed-Reports submitted 30 days following the month reports shall be on file with the Treasurer and available or quarter. for review within 30 days of the end of the month/quarter.' Quarterly and monthly reports shall include market value, Existing-Market values as of the end of each None and source of valuation. month/quarter are reported by PIMCO and Mellon. 6dsting-Value of funds in LAIF are reported monthly to None FAHR. Completed-2nd Quarter 1996 None Investment Report will include LAIF market value as reported by LAIR Reverse repo investments limited to 20%of portfolio. Eristing-Section 8.13 None Safekeeping of securities. busting-Section 10.0 None Mellon Trust is Districts'master custodial bank. Quarterly reports shall state that investments are in Brisling-Section 15.1.18 requires Investment Reports to Add the following phrase to Section 15.1.8: 'State that compliance with investment policy. include a feting of any transactions or holdings which do not all investments are In compliance with this policy and comply with this policy or with the California Government the California Government Code,or provide a.. f Code. 2nd Quarter 1996 Investment Report Included said statement Quarterly reports shall state that there are sufficient funds Completetl-2nd Quarter 1996 Investment Report included Add new Section 15.1.10 to read: 'State that sufficient to meet expenditure requirements for the next as months, said statement funds are available for CSDOC to meet its operating expenditure requirements for the next six months,or N not,state the reasons for the shordat' JiWPOOCTIMCRANEt PCMTG�AHR.96rCOVERS.96VNVESTRE.996 Y� ATTACHMENT 112" b ,pan Q • bb b COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY INVESTMENT POLICY Reviewed and Approved by Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee on September 11, 1996 Adopted by Boards of Directors on September 25, 1996 4� TABLE OF CONTENTS Section ink Pate 1.0 Policy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2.0 Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 3.0 Standard of Prudence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 4.0 Investment Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 5.0 Delegation of Authority . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 6.0 Ethics and Conflicts of Interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 7.0 Authorized Financial Dealers and Institutions . . . . . . . . 4 8.0 Authorized and Suitable Investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 10.0 Safekeeping and Custody . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 11.0 Diversification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 ?' I ¢N T mans i p 13.0 Internal Controls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 14.0 Performance Objectives and Benchmarks . . . . . . . . . . . 10 15.0 Reporting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 16.0 Investment Policy Adoption and Revision . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Appendix A. Summary of Investment Authorization "fib - \"K )it1 � itesttnetSt �e� . !r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CA 4 INVESTMENT STATEMENT 1.0 Policy: N!M rvj}y�,fien stncfs of O " � [d tit r safelevt =a eatonabl}�rateQLretuh ancf�onfamit�t„�td alt afat ,,, ��at �es gouemingthe ht__ rff ptbftr�ittFJ>�1,3; 1.1. This Investment Policy is set forth by CSDOC for the following purposes: 1.1.1. To establish a clear understanding for the Boards of Directors, CSDOC management, responsible employees and third parties of the objectives, policies and guidelines for the investment of the CSDOC's idle and surplus funds. 1.1.2. To offer guidance to investment staff and any external investment advisors on the investment of CSDOC funds (see Appendix"A°). 1.1.3. To establish a basis for evaluating investment results. 1.2. CSDOC establishes investment policies which meet its current investment goals. CSDOC shall review this policy annually, and may change its policies as its investment objectives change. 2.0 Scope: This Investment Policy applies to all financial assets of CSDOC O4ceptforHthe"lmdi the ', +wflis�tata " exteit �S3�� DflG�.5r,�pitat Theses „ HOC a tid���5D9 Z e Rnnuaffinaneia' pooldlnt e x General Fund Special Reserve Funds Debt Service Funds (unles rohibded by boKffl', ' __ Capital Project Funds Enterprise Funds Internal Service Fundd Trust and Agency Fu Any new Fund Vista Na EeGtOC a t8g1 , Board Page 1 of 12 3.0 Standard of Prudence: , r 3.1 The standard of prudence to be used by CSDOC internal staff shall be the "prudent person"standard defined below in Section 3.1.1, and shall be applied in the context of managing an overall portfolio. Investment staff acting in accordance with written procedures and the investment policy and exercising due diligence shall be relieved of personal responsibility for an individual security's credit risk or market price changes, provided deviations from expectations are reported in a timely fashion and appropriate action is taken to control adverse developments. 3.1.1 The Prudent Person Standard: Investments shall be made wdh judgment and care—under circumstances then prevailing— which persons of prudence, discretion and intelligence exercise in the management of their own affairs, not for speculation, but for investment, considering the probable safety of their capital as well as the probable income to be derived. 4.0 Investment Objectives: The primary objectives, in priority order, of CSDOC's investment activities shall be: ; �'hes � sddprs '�t�trn ,� itf��as#hefa amp; Sid e ! 11s i r�e � �ec#to'6� 1 d"rl�fine fY�l� a . �� � � ���dfn�i��d�t . V z"""an •" •11a re tr n " e (1 jig¢ ri The CSDOC invest"rt It G• tT1#fi FIJ� G if t1k td managed�with1he objective of achieving a rate"of'returrrtt�roughout Budgetary and economic,cycles, commensurate with legal, safety, and trctuidity considerations, Page 2 of 12 5.0 Delegation of Authority: Y 5.1 Authority to manage CSDOC's investment program is derived from the California Government Code Sections 53600 et seq. and Sections 53635 et seq. The Boards of Directors hereby delegates management responsibility for the CSDOC investment program to it's _ t e Treasurer, who shall establish written procedures for a operation of investment program consistent with this Policy « � # 4 t d „ � xkle „" , etrt NtJh fhis pJacy -No person may engage in an investment transaction except as provied under the terms of this Policy and the procedures established by the Treasurer. The Treasurer shall be responsible for all transactions undertaken by CSDOC internal staff, and shall establish a system of controls to regulate the activities of internal staff and external investment advisors engaged in accordance with Section 5.3. M If Ysw7lFprcvtc7efar, m)ked xzgJ 'ty , quarterly reports to the Finan � gmmittee, and the Boardsf �w Hy-accepted accouhTig.fiffift Board. ab marks for performance me" abiisfirnenf of a system �" ;al contrite 2.5 Establishment of written "dures for competitive bids a offn engs of securities that , be P, ased or sold by internal CSD staff. , w 5 2,6 Establishment of a' Desks„ Menu' operations and management - -- 5.3 The Boards of Directors of CSDOC may, in its discretion, engage the services of one or more registered investment advisors to assist in the management of CSDOC's investment portfolio in a manner consistent with CSDOC's objectives Such external investment advisors ,`e a T throtlgii a » ire prDCes ,-rshall be granted disc etion to our se and sell investment securities in accordance with this Investment Policy. Such advisors must be registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, or be exempt from such registration. Page 3 of 12 6.0 Ethics and Conflicts of Interest: 6.1 Officers and employees of CSDOC involved in the investment process shall refrain from personal business activities that could conflict with proper execution of CSDOC's investment program, or which could impair their ability to make impartial investment decisions. Employees and investment officials shall disclose to the General Manager any material financial interests in financial institutions that conduct business within CSDOC's boundaries, and they shall further disclose any large personal financial/investment positions, the performance of which could be related to the performance of positions in CSDOC's portfolio. 7.0 Authorized Financial Dealers and Institutions: 7.1 For investment transactions conducted by CSDOC internal staff, the Treasurer will maintain a list of financial institutions authorized to provide investment services to CSDOC, including "primary or regional dealers that kit Cfipda? ul9j<`� ndFedera .to Gf Gl r banks: N public deposit shall be made except in s qualifi pu is deposltory as established by State law. All financial institutions which desire to become qualified bidders for investment transactions with CSDOC must supply the following:0900'Td rtii by the Treasurer. 7.1.1. Audited financial statements for the institution's three (3) most recent fiscal years. 7.1.2. A statement in ttie{pf i Gouarnrtleni Finarf Officers Association {GFOA} certi mg (fiat tiie mstduhons-reviews CSDOC's Investment Policy and that all securities offered to the Districts shall comply fully and in every instance with all provisions of the California Government Code and with this Investment Policy. N- 1rt§ It dealer, and the . .' Via. Selection of financial institutions, broker/dealers, and banks authorized to engage in transactions with CSDOC shall I r annual review of the financial con dwn of qua1 ie mstdutions wi11 be conducted by the Treasurer. Page 4 of 12 7.2 Selection of broker/dealers used by external investment advisors retained by v CscOC i4;K f b ftrdoiritrli Tsiprls'b�twe csnt nve timeeraty 7 °bs !n s s rrafty�fhe .Ort#Iq � pr, •: e� a � ..: ;��¢Et z x e sir�.e 6r �r� t� '�,. ° �e�Ct�e� ,eke ,rrn ee propri�t� exter,�t �! t1r�rns�are 1:crnpekitz� P�ri� � ail�e ���"i��gs anct 8.0 Authorized and Suitable Investments: All investments shall be made in accordance with Sections 53600 at seq. of the Government Code of California, and as described within this Investment Policy. Permitted investments under this Policy shall include: 8.1 Securities issued by the US Government or an agency of the US Government and fully guaranteed as to payment by the US Government or agency of the US Government. Investment in mortgage-backed bonds and CMOs is not governed by this Section 8.1, even if such bonds are issued by agencies of the US Government. See Section 8.2 for conditions of purchase of mortgage-backed securities. See Section 8.11 for conditions of purchase of CMOs. 8.2 Mortgage-backed securities issued by an agency of the US Government, provided that the stated final maturity of such securities does not exceed five (5) years from the date of purchase. 8.3 Commercial paper rated a minimum of TV by Moody's Investor Services (Moody's), or"Al" by Standard & Poor's Inc. (S&P) provided that: (a)the maturity does not exceed 180 days from the date of purchase; (b) the issuer is a corporation organized and operating in the United States with assets in excess of$500 million; and (c) no more than 15% of the portfolio is invested in commercial paper, except that a maximum of 30% of the portfolio may be invested in commercial paper, so long as the average maturity of all commercial paper in the portfolio does not exceed 31 days. Page 5 of 12 8.4 Banker's acceptances issued by institutions, the short-term obligations of which are rated a minimum of "P1" by Moody's, or "At" by S&P provided v that: (a) the acceptance is eligible for purchase by the Federal Reserve System; (b) the maturity does not exceed 270 days; and (c) no more than 40% of the total portfolio may be invested in banker's acceptances. 8.5 Medium term (or corporate) notes issued by corporations organized and operating within the United States or by depository institutions licensed by the United States or any state and operating within the United States, the long- term obligations of which are rated at least "a3" by Moody's, or"A-" by S&P. No more than 30% of the portfolio may be invested in eligible medium term or corporate notes. 8.6 Shares of mutual funds investing in securities permitted under this policy and under California Government Code Section 53601. Such funds must either: (1) attain the highest ranking, or the highest letter and numerical rating, provided by not less than two of the three largest nationally recognized rating services; or(2) have an investment Advisor registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission with not less than five years of experience investing in the securities and obligations authorized under this Policy and under California Government Code Section 53601, and with assets under management in excess of$500 million. The purchase price of such shares may not include any commissions. Investment in mutual funds may not exceed 15% of the total portfolio. 8.7 Certificates of deposit: 8.7.1 Secured(collateralized)time deposits in banks meeting the following criteria: (a) in good standing with the California State Collateral Pool; and (b) having a net operating profit in the two (2) most recently completed fiscal years. 8.7.2 Negotiable certificates of deposit(NCDs) issued by financial institutions which shall have long-term debt rated "A3" or higher by Moody's, or "A-" or higher by S&P; or have short-term debt rated at least "P1" by Moody's, or"At"by S&P; or as otherwise approved by the Districts' Boards of Directors. 8.8 Taxable or tax-exempt municipal bonds issued by the State of California or its subdivisions. Such securities must be rated "A3" or higher by Moody's, or"A-" or higher by S&P; or as otherwise approved by the Districts' Boards of Directors. 8.9 The State of California Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF). 8.10 The Orange County Investment Pool. Page 6 of 12 8.11 Collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs) issued by agencies of the US v Government with a maximum stated final maturity of five years and asset- backed securities rated "Aaa" by Moody's S&P and "AAA" by S&P, with a maximum final stated maturity of five (5) years. Securities eligible for purchase under this Section 8.11 shall be issued by an issuer having a rating on its unsecured long-term debt of"A" or higher. Combined purchases of CMOs and asset-backed securities as authorized under this Section 8.11 may not exceed 20% of the total portfolio. 8.12 Repurchase agreements provided that: 8.12.1 All repurchase agreements shall be collateralized with securities eligible for purchase under this Policy, and are maintained at a level of at least 102% of the market value of the repurchase agreements. Collateral securities shall be delivered to a third-party safekeeping agent or to CSDOC's custodian bank. I 8.13 Reverse repurchase agreements provided that: 8.13.1 Generally, no more than 20% of CSDOC's portfolio shall be invested in reverse repurchase agreements, and there shall be no long-term reverse repurchase agreements unless otherwise authorized by the Districts' Boards of Directors. 8.13.2 The maximum maturity of reverse repurchase agreements shall be ninety (90) days. 8.13.3 Reverse repurchase agreements shall mature on the exact date of a known cash flow which will be unconditionally available to repay the maturing reverse repurchase. 8.13.4 Proceeds of reverse repurchase agreements shall be used solely to supplement portfolio income or to provide portfolio liquidity, and shall not be used to speculate on market movements. Page 7 of 12 8.14 Sales of CSDOC-owned securities in the secondary market may incur losses in order to improve the risk or return characteristics of the portfolio, to prevent o anticipated further erosion of principal, or when trading for securities that result in an expected net economic gain to CSDOC. 8.15 If securities owned by the CSDOC are downgraded by either Moody's or S&P to a level below the quality required by this Investment Policy, it shall be CSDOC's policy to review the credit situation and make a determination as to whether to sell or retain such securities in the portfolio. If a decision is made to retain the downgraded securities in the portfolio, their presence in the portfolio will be monitored and reported monthly to the CSDOC General Manager, the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee and Boards of Directors. 9.0 Collateralization: Sommer:_......,_..+_N..�.,_.... t + 10.0 Safekeeoina and Custody: 10.1 All securities transactions, including collateral for repurchase agreements, entered into by, or on behalf of CSDOC, shall be conducted on a delivery-versus-payment(DVP) basis. Securities will be held by CSDOC's third party custodian ban " process nr'lhatsgenE ,, 1=edgra)ReseNe 8enk; Mew arced liy sae eepmg receipts. 11.0 Diversification: Ada z, ot1 rn 11.1 There is no limit on investment in securities issued by or guaranteed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government. 11.2 No more than 20% of the portfolio may be invested in securities of a single agency of the U.S. government, which does not provide the full faith and credit of the U.S. government. 11.3 No more than 5% of the portfolio may be invested in securities of any one issuer, other than the U.S. government or its agencies. Page 8 of 12 11.4 No individual holding shall constitute more than 5% of the total debt v outstanding of any issuer. 11.5 No more than 40% of the portfolio may be invested in banker's acceptances. 11.6 No more than 15% of the portfolio may be invested in commercial paper, except that 30% of the portfolio may be so invested so long as the average maturity of all commercial paper in the portfolio does not exceed 31 days. 11.7 No more than 30% of the portfolio may be invested in medium-term (corporate) notes. 11.8 No more than 15% of the portfolio may be invested in mutual funds. 11.9 No more than 30% of the portfolio may be invested in negotiable certificates of deposit. 11.10 No more than 10% of the portfolio may be invested in eligible municipal bonds. 11.11 No more than 20% of the portfolio may be invested in a combination of CMOs and asset-backed securities. CMOs and asset-backed securities may only be purchased by the Districts' external money managers with prior Board approval, and may not be purchased by the Districts' staff. 11.12 No more than the lesser of 15% of the portfolio or the statutory maximum may be invested in LAIF. 11.13 No more than 15% of the portfolio may be invested in the Orange County Investment Pool. 11-.14 No more than 20% of the portfolio may be invested in repurchase agreements. 12.0 Maximum Maturities: ra� l,�ttertiPt rS�f) td is tvesTmenlswith aq . anticip ff qd .. The Treasurer shall develop a five-year cash flow fo�eces she I be uprf`ated quarterly. Based on this forecast, the Treasurer shall designate, from time-to-time, the amounts to be allocated to the investment portfolio. CSDOC monies invested in accordance with this Policy are divided into two (2) categories: 12.1 Liquid Operating Monies. Funds needed for current operating and capital expenditures are known as Liquid Operating Monies. 12.1.1 The maximum final stated maturity of individual securities in the Liquid Operating Monies account portfolio shall be one (1) year from the date of purchase. Page 9 of 12 12.1.2 The average duration of the Liquid Operating Monies account portfolio shall be recommended by the Treasurer based on the Districts' cash v flow requirements, but may never exceed NQ days, and shall be reviewed and approved by the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee, and shall be updated as needed. 12.2 Long Term Operating Monies. Funds needed for longer term purposes are known as the Long Term Operating Monies. 12.2.1 The maximum final stated maturity of individual securities in the Long Term Operating Monies account portfolio shall be five (5) years from the date of purchase, unless otherwise authorized by the Districts' Boards of Directors. 12.2.2 The duration of the Long Term Operating Monies account portfolio shall be recommended by the Treasurer based on the Districts' five-year cash flow forecast, shall be reviewed and approved by the Finance, Administration and Human Services Committee, and shall be updated as needed. 12.2.3 The duration of the Long Tenn Operating Monies account portfolio shall never exceed 120% of the duration as established in accordance with Section 12.2.2. 12.2.4 The duration of the Long Term Operating Monies account portfolio shall never be less than 80% of the duration as established in accordance with Section 12.2.2 13.0 Internal Controls: 13.1 The Treasurer shall establish an annual process of independent review by an external auditor. This review will provide internal control by assuring compliance with policies and procedures. 14.0 Performance Objectives and Benchmarks: 14.1 Overall objective. The investment portfolio of CSDOC shall be designed with the overall objective of obtaining a rate of return throughout budgetary and economic cycles, commensurate with investment risk constraints and reasonably anticipated cash flow needs. Page 10 of 12 14.2 The Liquid Operating Monies. The investment performance objective for v the Liquid Operating Monies shall be to earn a total rate of return over a market cycle which exceeds the return on a market index approved by the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee, and by the Districts' Boards of Directors, when the duration of the portfolio is established 1T1___ bit 14.3 The Long Tenn Operating Monies. The investment performance objective for the Long Term Operating Monies shall be to earn a total rate of return over a market cycle which exceeds the return on a market index selected by the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee and approved by the Districts' Boards of Directors, when the duration of the portfolio is established. >::, � _ „��(�. .. •.. : �j� 15.0 Reporting: 15.1 Monthly anid q "investment reports shall be submitted by the Treasurer to the Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee which shall forward the reports to the Districts' Boards of Directors. { shall betl6TtEhi t These repo s shall disclose, at a mmrmum, t e o oHnng information about the risk characteristics of CSDOC's portfolio: 15.1.1 Cost and accurate and complete market value of the portfolio. 15.1.2 Modified duration of the portfolio compared to Benchmark. 15.1.3 Dollar change in value of the portfolio for a 1% change in interest rates. 15.1.4 Percent of portfolio invested in reverse repurchase agreements, and a schedule which matches the maturity of such reverse repurchase agreements with the cash flows which are available to repay them at maturity. 15.1.5 For the Liquid Operating Monies account only, the percent of portfolio maturing within 90 days. 15.1.6 Average portfolio credit quality. 15.1.7 Percent of portfolio with credit ratings below "A" by any rating agency, and a description of such securities. Page 11 of 12 ff01 €�rWde,a listing of any transactions or s "os which do not comply wd liis policy or with the California Government Code. 15.1.9 Time-weighted total rate of return for the portfolio for the prior three months, twelve months, year to date, and since inception compared to the Benchmark returns for the same periods. 151.10 s are available for 1Ae rerafin$ax'p requ 1 thenextsaxrna tereasons:for x cHalt. 15.2 CSDOC's Treasurer shall meet quarterly with the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee to review investment performance, proposed strategies and compliance with this investment policy. 16.0 Investment Policy Adoption and Revision: 16.1 The Investment Policy of CSDOC shall be reviewed by the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee and shall be adopted by resolution of the Boards of Directors of CSDOC. The Policy shall be reviewed on an annual basis by the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee, which shall recommend revisions, as appropriate, to the Boards of Directors. Any modifications made thereto shall be approved by the Boards of Directors. 16.2 The Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee shall serve as the oversight committee for the Districts' Investment program and shall adopt guidelines for the ongoing review of duration, quality and liquidity of the Districts' portfolio. Page 12 of 12 APPENDIX "A" SUMMARY OF INVESTMENT AUTHORIZATION INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL MANAGERS SHORT TERM OPERATING FUND INVESTMENT INTERNAL EXTERNAL U.S. Treasuries OK OK Federal Agencies Fixed coupon, fixed mat. OK Mortgage-backed NO NO Commercial paper OK OK Banker's Accept. OK OK Medium Term Notes Fixed coupon, fixed mat.' OK Mutual Funds Money Market Only" Money Market Only Negotiable CDs Fixed coupon, fixed mat.' OK Municipal Bonds OK" NO LAIF OK NO OCIP OK NO CMOs NO NO Asset-backed NO NO Repurchase Agree. OK OK Reverse Re os OK` OK LONG TERM OPERATING PORTFOLIO INVESTMENT INTERNAL EXTERNAL U.S. Treasuries OK OK Federal Agencies Fixed coupon, fixed mat. OK Mortgage-backed NO OK Mutual Funds Money Market Only" OK Negotiable CDs Fixed coupon, fixed mat.' OK Municipal Bonds OK' OK LAIF OK NO OCIP OK NO CMOs NO With Board Approval Asset-backed NO With Board Approval Repurchase Agree. OK OK Reverse Re os OK' OK 'With prior approval of the Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee. "Using financial institutions approved by the Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee. JWPa^CIFlMCRANEIMVMKV INVEW.Po e APPENDIX "B,, RESOLUTION NO. ADOPTING THE DISTRICTS' INVESTMENT POLICY A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE DISTRICTS' INVESTMENT POLICY; ADOPTING INVESTMENT PERFORMANCE REPORTS AND SCHEDULE OF FREQUENCY OF INVESTMENT PERFORMANCE REPORTS; REPEALING RESOLUTIONS NOS. 95-14, 95-15 AND 95-78; AND RESCINDING MINUTE ORDER OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF MAY 24, 1995 APPROVING THE DISTRICTS' INVESTMENT POLICY WHEREAS, on February 8, 1995, the Boards of Directors adopted Resolutions Nos. 9514 and 95-15, approving interim investment policies following the Orange County bankruptcy and before the Districts' permanent Investment Policy was adopted; and, WHEREAS, on May 24, 1995, the Boards of Directors adopted, by Minute Order, a comprehensive Investment Policy; and, WHEREAS, on July 26, 1995, the Boards of Directors adopted Resolution No. 95-78, establishing specific performance benchmarks and objectives, together with a schedule of frequency of investment performance reports; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to California Government Code Section 53646, the Districts are required to review their Investment Policy annually and re-adopt their Policy at a public meeting, which Policy will establish specific performance benchmarks and objectives, and specific performance monitoring and reporting. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California. 0 DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt the Investment Policy of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California, as set forth on Exhibit "A," attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Section 2: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt the following specific performance benchmarks for their two investment funds in accordance with Section 14.0 of the Districts' Investment Policy. LIQUID OPERATING MONIES-The Short-Tenn Operating Fund will be compared to the three-month T-bill rate, and the Callan Active Cash Fixed Income Style Group. The Callan Active Cash Fixed Income Style Group represents a peer group of managers who operate with a maximum maturity of one year. LONG-TERM OPERATING MONIES - The Long-Tenn Operating Fund will be compared to the Merrill Lynch Government and Corporate One-to-Five Year Maturity Index and to the Callan Defensive Fixed Income Style Group. Section 3: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt a performance monitoring and reporting schedule, as required by Section 15.0 of the Districts' Investment Policy, which schedule is attached hereto as Exhibit "B"and incorporated herein by reference. Section 4: That Resolution Nos. 94-14, 95-15 and 95-78 are hereby repealed, and the Minute Order of the Boards of Directors of May 24, 1995, approving the Districts' Investment Policy is hereby rescinded. Section 5: This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 25, 1996. 2 EXHIBIT "B" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING FOR THE DISTRICTS' INVESTMENT PROGRAM POLICY REFERENCE PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTIC REPORTING PARTY* PIMCO MELLON CALLAN 15.1.1 Cost and market value of the portfolio (monthly mark-ta-market). M,0 M,Q Q 15.1.2 Modified duration of the portfolio compared to benchmark. M,Q 0 15.1.3 Dollar change in value of the portfolio for a 1%change In interest rate. M,Q Q 15.1.4 Percent of portfollo Invested in reverse repurchase agreements, and a schedule which matches the maturity of such reverse repurchase agreements with the cash flows which are available to repay them at maturity. M,q 15.1.5 For the Liquid Operating Monies account only,the percent ofpodfolio maturing within 90 days. M,Q 0 15.1.6 Average portfolio credit quality. M,Q 0 15.1.7 Percent of portfolio with credit ratings below Why any rating agency, and a description of such securities. M,Q 0 15.1.8 Listing of any transactions or holdings which do not comply with this policy or with the California Government Code. M,Q 15.1.9 Time-weighted total rate of return for the portfolio for the prior three months,twelve months,year- to-date,and since inception compared to the benchmark retume for the same periods. M,Q Q ADDL" Comparison of portfolio performance to market index benchmark. M,Q Q ADDL" Comparison of Manager's performance to peer group benchmark. 0 ADDL" Monitoring or organizational and structural changes of Investment management firm. Q ADDL•' Audit portfolios for compliance with investment policy guidelines. Q 15.1.10 CSDOC will report if sufficient funds are available for it to meet operating expenditure requirements for the next six months,or if not,stale the reasons for the shortfall. Notes 'M=Monthly Q=Quanedy "ADDL=Monitoring of Additional Performance Cheractedstics �awvoonewcmwtvav¢sr.nrwommoa.art APPENDIX "C" GLOSSARY OF INVESTMENT TERMS Agencies. Shorthand market terminology for any obligation issued by a government- sponsored entity(GSE), or a federally related institution. Obligations of GSEs are not guaranteed by the full faith and credit of the US government. There are eight GSEs, five of which are currently active in the new issue market. The five include: FFCB. The Federal Farm Credit Bank System provides credit and liquidity in the agricultural industry. FFCB issues discount notes and bonds. FHLB. The Federal Home Loan Bank provides credit and liquidity in the housing market. FHLB issues discount notes and bonds. FHLMC. Like FHLB, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation provides credit and liquidity in the housing market. FHLMC, also called "FreddieMac" issues discount notes, bonds and mortgage pass-through securities. FNMA. Like FHLB and FreddieMac, the Federal National Mortgage Association was established to provide credit and liquidity in the housing market. FNMA, also known as "FannieMee," issues discount notes, bonds and mortgage pass- through securities. SLMA. The student loan marketing association, also known as "SallieMae; provides liquidity to private lenders who make various types of loans for education. SLMA currently issues floating rate notes. Federally related institutions are arms of the federal government. Most do not issue securities directly into the market. Those which do issue directly include the following: GNMA. The Government National Mortgage Association, known as "GinnieMae," issues mortgage pass-through securities which are guaranteed by the full faith and credit of the US Government. PEFCO. The Private Export Funding corporation assists exporters. Obligations of PEFCO are not guaranteed by the full faith and credit of the US government. TVA. The Tennessee Valley Authority provides flood control and power and promotes development in portions of the Tennessee, Ohio and Mississippi River valleys. TVA currently issues discount notes and bonds. Amortized Cost. Measure of the cost of a security whereby the cost value will change over time as the discount or premium paid for the security is gradually incorporated into the principal value as interest payments are received. Page 1 of 7 e Asked. The price at which a seller offers to sell a security. Asset-backed securities. Securities collateralized with consumer receivables, such as automobile loans, credit card receivables, or home equity loans, which are owned by the issuer, but placed with a trustee for the benefit of the investor. Average life. In mortgage-related investments, including CMOs, the average time to expected receipt of principal payments, weighted by the amount of principal expected. Banker's acceptance. A money market instrument created to facilitate international trade transactions. It is highly liquid and safe because the risk of the trade transaction is transferred to the bank which "accepts" the obligation to pay the investor. Benchmark. A comparison security or portfolio. A performance benchmark is a partial market index which reflects the mix of securities allowed under a specific investment policy. Bid. The price at which a buyer offers to buy a security. Broker. A broker brings buyers and sellers together for a transaction for which the broker receives a commission. A broker does not sell securities from his own position. Bullet structure. A portfolio strategy in which a manager overweights both the short and long end of the yield curve, and underweights the middle part of the curve. Certificate of Deposit (CD). A time deposit with a specific maturity evidenced by a certificate. Large denomination CDs may be marketable. Collateral. Securities or cash pledged by a borrower to secure repayment of a loan or repurchase agreement. Also, securities pledged by a financial institution to secure deposits of public moneys. Collateralized Mortgage Obligations (CMO). Classes of bonds which redistribute the cash flows of mortgage securities (and whole loans) to create securities which have different levels of prepayment risk, as compared to the underlying mortgage securities. Commercial paper. The short-term unsecured debt of corporations. Conditional prepayment rate (CPR). A measure of mortgage prepayment activity. It assumes that a constant fraction of the principal prepays each month and is based on the previous month's remaining balance. The rate is expressed as an annualized percentage. For instance, a CPR of 6% indicates that each month 6% of the remaining principal balance prepays on an annualized basis. Page 2 of 7 e Convexity. The rate of change in a bond's price as duration changes. It is a particularly important component of price change for longer term bonds, or for large changes in interest rates. Cost Yield. The annual income from an investment divided by the purchase cost. Because it does not give effect to premiums and discounts which may have been included in the purchase cost, it is an incomplete measure of return. Coupon. The rate at which a bond pays interest. Credit risk. The risk that principal and/or interest on an investment will not be paid in a timely manner due to changes in the condition of the issuer. Current yield. The annual income from an investment divided by the current market value. Since the mathematical calculation relies on the current market value rather than the investor's cost, current yield is unrelated to the actual return the investor will earn if the security is held to maturity. Dealer. A dealer acts as a principal in security transactions, selling securities from and buying securities for his own position. Debenture. A bond secured only by the general credit of the issuer. Derivative. Any security that has principal and/or interest payments which are subject to uncertainty (but not for reasons of default or credit risk) as to timing and/or amount, or any security which represents a component of another security which has been separated from other components ("Stripped" coupons and principal). A derivative is also defined as a financial instrument the value of which is totally or partially derived from the value of another instrument, interest rate or index. Discount. The difference between the par value of a bond and the cost of the bond, when the cost is below par. Some short-term securities, such as Tbills and banker's acceptances, are known as discount securities. They sell at a discount from par, and return the par value to the investor at maturity without additional interest. Other securities, which have fixed coupons trade at a discount when the coupon rate is lower than the current market rate for securities of that maturity and/or quality. Diversification. Dividing investment funds among a variety of investments to avoid excessive exposure to any one source of risk. Duration. The weighted average time to maturity of a bond where the weights are the present values of the future cash flows. Duration measures the price sensitivity of a bond to changes in interest rates. (See modified duration and effective duration). Page 3 of 7 Effective duration. Measures the price volatility of a fixed income security that ° contains embedded options. A more accurate measure of price volatility when the cash flow characteristics of the bond change when interest rates shift. Federal funds rate. The rate of interest charged by banks for short term loans to other banks. It is established by the Federal Reserve Bank through open-market operations. Federal Open Market Committee. A committee of the Federal Reserve Board which establishes monetary policy and executes it through temporary and permanent changes to the supply of bank reserves. Ladder structure. A portfolio strategy in which a manager attempts to weight securities equally across the yield curve. Leverage. Borrowing funds in order to invest in securities which have the potential to pay earnings at a rate higher than the cost of borrowing. Liquidity. The speed and ease with which an asset can be converted to cash. Market risk. The risk that the value of securities will fluctuate with changes in overall market conditions or interest rates. Market value. The price at which a security can be traded. Marking to market. The process of posting current market values for securities in a portfolio. Maturity. The final date upon which the principal of a security becomes due and payable. Medium term note. A corporate bond which is brought to market over a period of time rather than at a single offering. Generally issued as senior unsecured obligations of the borrower. Modified duration. Measures the percentage price volatility of a fixed income security or portfolio. Modified duration approximates the change in price for small changes in interest rates, assuming that the cash flow characteristics do not change when the yield curve shifts. Money market. The market in which short term debt instruments (Tbills, discount notes, commercial paper and banker's acceptances) are issued and traded. Mortgage Pass Through Securities. Securities collateralized with residential mortgage loans, the principal and interest payments of which are distributed, or "passed-through" to the investor. Many of these securities are issued by agencies of the federal government, including GNMA and FHLMC. Page 4 of 7 Mutual fund. An entity which pools the funds of investors and invests those funds in a set of securities which is specifically defined in the fund's prospectus. Mutual funds can be invested in various types of domestic and/or international stocks, bonds and money market instruments, as set forth in the individual fund's prospectus. For most large, institutional investors, the costs associated with investing in mutual funds are higher than the investor can obtain through an individually managed portfolio. Negative convexity. A phenomenon associated with bonds which have embedded call options, it measures the rate at which duration of a callable bond gets smaller as interest rates fall. Negative convexity is an undesirable characteristics in bonds. PSA Standard Prepayment Model (PSA). A measure of mortgage prepayment activity. The model is expressed as a monthly series of annual prepayment rates. The series begins at .2% per year in the first month, and increases by .2% per year in each successive month until month 30, where it levels out at 6% per year until maturity. This series is labeled 100 PSA. 200 PSA doubles this series, and 50 PSA would cut the series in half. Option adjusted spread. A measure of the value of a bond relative to a benchmark security, which takes into account the value of the embedded option inherent in any bond that has uncertain cash flows (i.e., callable bonds). Premium. The difference between the par value of a bond and the market value of the bond, when the market value is above par. Prepayment speed. A measure of how quickly principal is repaid to investors in mortgage securities. Prepayment window. The time period over which principal repayments will be received on mortgage securities at a specified prepayment speed. Prudent man (person) rule. A standard of responsibility which applies to fiduciaries. In California, the rule is stated as "Investments shall be managed with the care, skill, prudence and diligence, under the circumstances then prevailing, that a prudent person, acting in a like capacity and familiar with such matters, would use in the conduct of an enterprise of like character and with like aims to accomplish similar purposes." Realized return. The change in value of the portfolio due to interest received and interest earned and realized gains and losses. It does not give effect to changes in market value on securities which have not been sold from the portfolio. Repurchase agreement (RP, Repo). Short term purchases of securities with a simultaneous agreement to sell the securities back at a higher price. From the seller's point of view, the same transaction is a reverse repurchase agreement. Page 5 of 7 Safekeeping. A service to bank customers whereby securities are held by the bank In the customer's name. Scenario analysis. A portfolio management technique that measures the performance of the portfolio under varying scenarios including, but not limited to, interest rate movements, spread changes and nonparallel yield curve shifts. Structured note. A complex, fixed income instrument which pays interest based on a formula tied to other interest rates, commodities or indices. Examples include inverse floating rate notes which have coupons that increase when other interest rates are falling, and which fall when other interest rates are rising, and "dual index floaters," which pay interest based on the relationship between two other interest rates -for example, the yield on the ten-year Treasury note minus the Libor rate. Issuers of such notes lock in a reduced cost of borrowing by purchasing interest rate swap agreements. Total rate of return. A measure of a portfolio' performance over time. It is the internal rate of return which equates the beginning value of the portfolio with the ending value, and includes interest earnings and realized and unrealized gains and losses on the portfolio. U.S. Treasury obligations. Securities issued by the U.S. Treasury and backed by the full faith and credit of the United States. Treasuries are considered to have no credit risk, and are the benchmark for interest rates on all other securities in the US and overseas. The Treasury issues both discounted securities and fixed coupon notes and bonds. Treasury bills. All securities issued with initial maturities of one year or less are issued as discounted instruments, and are called Treasury bills. The Treasury currently issues three- and six-month Tbills at regular weekly auctions. It also issues "cash management" bills as needed to smooth out cash flows. Treasury notes. All securities issued with initial maturities of two to ten years are called Treasury notes, and pay interest semi-annually. Treasury bonds. All securities issued with initial maturities greater than ten years are called Treasury bonds. Like Treasury notes, they pay interest semi- annually. Volatility. The rate at which security prices change with changes in general economic conditions or the general level of interest rates. Yield to Maturity (YTM). The annualized internal rate of return on an investment which equates the expected cash flows from the investment to its cost. Page 6 of 7 Yield to maturity (at market). The discount rate that equates the present value of the promised cash flow (interest payments and redemption value)to the market price, assuming that all cash flows are invested at the YTM rate. Yield to maturity (at purchase cost). The YTM that equates to the purchase price of the security Page 7 of 7 F.itsd �a AGENDA ITEM IN N� ' TRANSMITTAL r � ;R IBIS QArm.;Ng„ MEETING DATE .. COMM.:10.N0. DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION (Inflials of Originator) OMITS: _„OMITS PDC: PDC = +1 FAHR:9-11-96 FAHR "� All 2520 Mike Peterman ext.210E EXEC: n EXEC • d,.,,+.: STEER' :STEER Division No.,Name,and Extension AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION($): Agenda Wording: ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 132 PROVIDING ADDITIONAL SERVICE CREDIT FOR RETIREMENT PURPOSES. (All Districts) The Director of Human Resources, in conjunction with the FAHR COMMITTEE, recommends that the Directors adopt the ordinance providing for two years additional service credit to eligible employees who retire between January 1 and March 31, 1997, in accordance with the provisions of Government Code Section 31641.04. Recommended Action(s): Adopt Ordinance No. 132, an Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California providing eligible District employees to receive two years additional service credit for retirement purposes. CEQA REVIEW: Project is Exempt: NOT APPLICABLE DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM: Date Notice of Exemption Filed: Negative Declension Approved on Final EIR Approved on and Notice of Determination(led on June 28, 1995, Ordinance No. 126 BUDGET INFORMATION CURRENTYEAR CURRENTYEAR. YEAR-TO-DATE REVISED BUDGET TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.: N/A BUDGET AMOUNT TO-DATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL SOURCE: CORF JO DISTRICTS EXPENDITURES porn lwdvne T—m.R) ScnedulelLins Item: $0 $0 $0 $0 AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: Schadul.A-ine Item: AIT/PROJECT COST INFORMATION ORIGINAL BID,PO, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED PROJECT CONTRACT FUNDS PREY. REQUESTED THIS AMOUNT AMOUNT APPROVED An N/A N/A N/A N/A WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL] NO REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? YES If YES,state numlaer: _Permanent Limaed Term If YES,explain in ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section CONCURRENCES: ATTACHMENTS TO AGENDA(List) To Committee: 1. AttachmentA Z. OrAf�nct c" ,Vc . 132- Signature Date Division nag r :Or Des - �, ti1c>v� 9 ?-T-7L Signature Date TO JI.Bits.: 1. Attachment Department Head (Or Designee) z . O rd rngn u No . 17 2- L�ft�l—� C.tJ t.(e wa tf 54te �4 G Sig t e Da Awls nt General Manager(Or Designee) OMTS COMM. PDC COMM. FAHR COMM. JOINT BOARDS Meeting Date: Approved: Amended: Forwarded to: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION(Background anWor Summary) On March 8, 1995, the Boards adopted Resolution 95-19 which implemented the early retirement incentive provisions of Govemment Cade Section 31641.04. This resolution allowed the addition of two years service credit to certain employees otherwise eligible to retire who actually applied for retirement during the period March 1, 1995 through April 30, 1995. The retirement incentive was again offered during the period May 1 through June 30, 1995, and during the period January 1 through March 30, 1996. Eleven employees elected to participate in the program during those three window periods resulting in a substantial savings to the Districts. Salary and benefits cost avoidance over the five-year period FY95- FY99 is estimated at $2,424,096 One additional employee retired in August, 1996 through a special Board action. Staff continues to believe that District-wide encouragement of accelerated attrition will have a positive effect on the organizational change sought by the Districts. Early retirement will provide an effective means of achieving that objective. By deleting the vacant positions caused by early retirement, the Districts will realize significant cost savings in salaries and benefits. There are currently 53 employees who meet the eligibility criteria for retirement. At least eight employees have expressed strong interest in early retirement. If these employees exercise the early retirement option, it is projected that the Districts will save an additional $939,387 through FY99 (see exhibit A) MP:jb c: Department Head AGM-Administration AGM-Operations General Manager A?AITSEPT.96 Page 2 of 2 Revision: 82W96 F 6, MSMS Total Net Mn1 Date Working Monlhly Annual Position f aTime Net Annual Savings Salary Savings Retired Y.10 65 Salary Salary Chem CIDERS RIM il�M 9697 9798 W99 Scientist 51195 3 5.281 63.372 Deleted 13.872 10.562 49.500 63.372 63,3n 186,806 Fac Mgr 3/31195 1 5,735 68,820 Deleted 51,402 17,205 17,418 68,520 103,443 Weer 60(1195 2 3,4M 40,800 Deleted 35.497 - 5,303 40,BOD 40,800 d0,800 127,703 Meth Field Super 3/31/95 13 5,M2 60,024 Deleted 31,227 15,008 26,797 60,024 M,024 M,024 223.875 Foreman 3131195 7 4.132 49,586 Deleted 31,768 12,396 17,516 49,554 49.554 0.584 MAN Meth Field Super 42895 7 5.017 60,204 Deleted 41,030 10,034 19,174 80.2W 60,204 60,21M 209.8M Subtotal 94-95 Program 28,567 342,804 204,796 65.203 138,WS 273,984 342,SD4 342,KM 1,030,011 Senior Storeskeeper 32896 10 3,648 43,776 Deleted 26.152 10,W4 17,624 43.776 43,776 116,120 NR And 32898 7 3,697 44,31st Deleted 26,504 11,091 17,860 44,35`1 44,364 117,679 Opm Super 1/1556 4 5,105 84,260 Deleted 36,598 28.078 24.662 44,384 44,384 141,468 Oper Super 1115/98 10 5,105 8/980 Deleted W.598 28,078 24,662 61.280 61,2w 175,260 Mice Mgr MEV96 13 6,132 73,384 Deleted 43,960 18,396 29,624 73,554 73,51BI 195,188 Sr.ConaLlnspec BI15IS8 12 5,399 64,768 Deleted 38,705 58,690 26,083 64,788 147,560 SUMotal 95-M Program 29,086 349,032 2W.517 95586 171.122 293,431 332,136 893,275 Total Salary Savings 1,923,886 Total Salary Benefit Savings 500,210 TotalNetSalary8Benefd Savingsof W-%Pro pram 2,626,OB6 Foreman 1/197 11 4.654 55,850 Delete 33.366 27,924 22.484 55,850 106,258 Sr.ConsLlrrpec Mlw 3 4.735 56,821 Delete M.946 14,205 22,675 56.821 93,901 Inslruni Tech II MI97 10 4,251 51.018 Wee M.479 12,753 20,539 51.018 84,310 Sr.Mice.Planner 313197 5 5.549 66,594 Delete 39,784 18,W7 26.810 66.594 110,061 Sr.Plant Ooeralor 39197 6 4.08 53,864 Delete 32,179 13,4841 21,685 53.054 89,013 Lead Mechanic MI97 2 4,108 49,297 Delete 29.451 12,324 19,846 49.297 81,487 Mice.Manager M197 15 6,316 75,799 Delete 45.283 18,9as 30.516 75.799 125,263 Sr.Cleric 39197 4 2.787 33,453 Delete 19,985 8,361 13,468 33,453 55,2B2 Sublalal Proposed 98-97 Program 36,868 442,696 264,4M 124,626 178.223 442,696 745,545 Trial Salary Savings 745.545 Total Salary Benefit Savings 193,842 y Total Net Salary 8 Benefit Savings of Proposed 9"IF Program 839,387 a x Program Trial 1,131,532 8]7,786 85.203 236,590 569,732 81 O,d% 1,117,638 2,869,431 3 m z 16,953 M.984 148,130 211,759 290,5EBI n8,421 A 82,156 295,588 717,M 1,026,217 1,408.221 3397.852 EARLYRETAB 3:31 PM ORDINANCE NO. 132 PROVIDING ADDITIONAL SERVICE CREDIT TO ELIGIBLE DISTRICTS' EMPLOYEES WHO RETIRE EARLY AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA PROVIDING FOR AN EARLY RETIREMENT INCENTIVE PROGRAM BY GRANTING ADDITIONAL SERVICE CREDIT TO ELIGIBLE DISTRICTS' EMPLOYEES AS AUTHORIZED BY THE COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT LAW OF 1937, GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 31641.04. WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts No. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 adopted Resolution No. 95-19 and Resolution No. 95-53 approving an Early Retirement Incentive Program for all eligible Districts' employees, as authorized by California Government Code Section 31641.04, and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement by and among County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, District No. 1 is the appointed authorized agent to act for every other District, and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, acting as agent for County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, adopted Ordinance No. 126 on June 28, 1995, incorporating all of the same provisions as in Joint Resolutions Nos. 95-19 and 95-53. and WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 have determined that the manner of performing service, and the total cost savings of having higher compensated employees retire and lower compensated employees hired to replace the retirees exceeds the total actuarial cost of the additional service granted to those who retire under this program. NOW THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, does hereby ORDAIN: Section I: All regular employees of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California, who are eligible to participate as members and retire under the Orange County Employees Retirement System are granted two (2) additional years of service credit for retirement benefit purposes, provided they retire from regular employment of the Districts during the period of January 1, 1997 through and including March 31, 1997. Section It: The General Manager of the Districts is authorized to execute any and all contracts of other documents and to transfer all required funds in order to implement the authorized actions provided for herein. Section III: The total cost savings of positions filled at a lower level or held vacant for a period of time shall exceed the total actuarial cost of the additional service credit granted and related paid leave pay-off costs. Section IV: This Ordinance shall become effective January 1, 1997. Section V: The Secretary of the Board shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause a summary to be published in a newspaper of general circulation as the District is required by law. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 at a regular meeting held September 25, 1996. Chair of the Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California ATTEST: Secretary of the Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California J:\WPD000S\0RDMffi 0RD1W WPD IedawaonM AGENDA Y ' ITEM �oa'tXaL�issioN TRANSMITTAL � P �u MEETING DATE �a3' � DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION (Initials of Onginatop OMTs: '�' 'i. PDC' sPDC ." FAHR. 9/11/96 FAHR 2150,Judy Wilson, Ext.2005 EXEC .....EXEC... s.'# All STEER: -STEER " Division No.,Name,and Exlenslon JT.Bos: 925/96 "I AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Agenda Wordina: PROPOSITION 218, RIGHT TO VOTE ON TAXES ACT (All Districts): The Chief Administrative Officer requests that the Boards go on record in opposition to Proposition 218 which would impose significant and expensive procedural requirements on the noticing of proposed extensions of, or increases to, user fees. The proposition also provides for the application of the voter initiative to user fees, which means that a voter initiative could force a roll-back or reduction in user fees which would have an adverse affect on the Districts' ability to borrow at low interest rates. Recommended Action(s): The Committee recommends that the Districts take no official position opposing Proposition 218, but continue to participate in gathering and distributing information regarding the potential impacts of the measure. CEOA REVIEW: Project is Exempt: NOT APPLICABLE DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM: Date Notice of Exemption Filed Negative Declaraion Approved on Final EIR Appro¢d on_and Notice of Determinalion fined on No previous action taken BUDGET INFORMATION CURRENT YEAR CURRENT YEAR- YEAR404)ATE REVISED BUDGET TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.: $ BUDGET AMOUNT TOZATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL SOURCE: CORF JO DISTRICTS EXPENDITURES Rua amen ps Tnmr.nl SctIeduleA-me Item: N/A N/A N/A N/A AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: SctIedule/tine Item: AIT/PROJECT COST INFORMATION ORIGINAL BID,PO, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED PROJECT CONTRACT FUNDS PREV. REQUESTED THIS AMOUNT AMOUNT APPROVED AIT N/A N/A N/A N/A WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? NO CONCURRENCES: ATTACHMENTS TO AGENDA (List) To Committee: 1. Draft copy of Proposition 218 Signature Date Division Manager(Or Designee) Signature Date To Jt. Bds.: 1. Draft copy of Proposition 218 Department Head (Or Designee) —�. C(Oczd.:a gnature Date Assistant General Manager(Or Designee) OMITS COMM. PDC COMM. FAHR COMM. JOINT BOARDS Meeting Date- Approved, Amended: Forwardedto: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION(Background andler Summary) Proposition 218 will be on the November 1996 ballot. Also known as the Fox Initiative,after its author Joel Fox,Proposition 218 is intended to follow the intent of Proposition 13 requiring voter approval of tax increases. Proposition 218 states that the 'measure protects taxpayers by limiting the methods by which governments exact revenue from taxpayers without their consent. Proposition 218 affects the Districts in two significant ways: 1) Initiative Power for Local Taxes,Assessments,Fees and Charges. Section 3 of the Proposition includes special districts as units of local governments, and states that the initiative power shall not be prohibited or otherwise limited in matters of reducing or repealing any local tax, assessments,fee or charge. This would allow a voter initiative to roll-back or repeal user fees. Currently, Districts'property taxes are not sufficient to meet current debt service and must be supplemented by reserves. If future additional debt is issued,a user fee increase would be necessary to meet debt service. The extent that such user fees are vulnerable to voter initiative must be disclosed to the investment community. Such a circumstance may increase the cost of issuance and affect the marketability of future bonds. 2) Notification Procedures for Fees and Charges. The initiative includes fees for sanitation within the scope of this measure and requires: that all parcels subject to the fee be identified;that the amount of the fee must be calculated for each parcel;that written notice be provided by mail to each owner of record for each identified parcel with the amount of the fee,the basis for the calculation,the reason for the fee change,and the date,time and location of a public hearing. A public hearing must be held within 45 days of the notice. At the public hearing,the agency must consider all protests. If there is a protest by a majority of owners of the identified parcels,no charge to the fee can be imposed. A fee or charge can not be extended,imposed or increased unless these procedures are followed. Sewer fees are not subject to the approval requirement of the majority of property owners or 2/3 of the electorate residing in the area. With over 400,000 parcels,the costs for mailing alone would be$140,000 not including the computer programming to generate the notice and calculation and the staff time to process ft. If the proposition should pass,the effective date of Proposition 218 is July 1, 1997. Attached is a draft copy of the actual language as it will appear on the ballot. This copy was provided by the Secretary of State's Office and includes the Attorney General's office edits for ballot preparation. J1WPDOCWGENDAIFAHRW96-AITI.JAW Page 2 of 3 ReNaon: arAW !90/U(/Jo ld:po Y �' v�-'� - •ry rW�lJ G- � 71 ,/may Tact of Proposad LAW L�9� This initiative measure is submitted to the people in accordance With the provisions of Article II, Section 8 of the Constitution. This initiative measure expressly amends the Constitution by adding articles thereto; therefore, new provisions proposed to be added are printed in ItaSic type to i.._ -.ate that they are new. PROPMEP A➢ ZTIOE OF ARTICLE YIXX C A= ARTICLE VTTT O DRAFT / ee/a7i9s 13:59 P> 1 - � ]RIGHT TO VOTE ON TAXES ACT ri� swnoril CTION 1. Tfl'LE. This�ct shall be known and may be cited as the Right to Vote TaxesAct 2 FINDINGS AND DECLARATIONS. The Keople of the State of California J hereby find and declare that Proposition 13 was intended to provide effective tax relief and to-require voter approval of tax increases. However, local governments have subjected taxpayers to excessive tax, assessment, fee and charge increases that not 0* frustrate the purposes of voter approval for tax increases, but also threaten the economic security of all Californians and the California economy itself. This measure protects taxpayers by limiting the methods by which local governments-exact revenue from taxpayers without their consent - gSECnON 3. VOTER ROVAL FOR LOCAL. TAX LEVIES. Article XII the lifomia Constitution 3Ar7i c. le_ X Itl C. C ,qSE t. Definitions. VIO N s used in this Vticle: (a) 'General tax' means any tax imposed for general governmental purposes. `t\ (b) 'Laval government' means any county, city, city and county, including a charter city or county, any special district, or any other local or regional ,NL\, governmental entity. la �.' (e) 'Special �iszrice means an agency of the state, formed pursuant to general law orvepecial act for the local performance of govemmental.or proprietary functions with limited geographic boundaries including, but not limited to, school districts and redevelopmerrtagencies. Is (d) 'Special tax' means arty tan imposed for specific purposesfincluding a taxd6 imposed for specific purposas�which are placed into a general fund. SEC. 2. Local Govemmant Tax Lintitation. qziatwithstand ng arty other provision of this Consttudon: (a) All taxes imposed by any local government shall be deemed to be either general ty or spPew taxes. Special purpose districts or agencies, •I including school districts. shall have no power to levy general taxes. ` 08/07/96 13:59 Right to Vote on Taxes Act „ k Page 2 k� �Q(b) _ No local govemme may impose;extend,or increase any general tax unless and until tax is submitted to the electorate and approved by a majority vote. A general tax shall not be deemed to have been increased if it is imposed at a rate not higher than the maximum rate so approved. The election required by this subdivision snali be consolidated with a regularly scheduled general election for members of the governing body of the local Governmerittexcept in mses of emergency declared by a unanimous vote of the go ming body. (c) Any general tax imposed, wandedjor Increased, without voter approval, v by any local government on or after January 1, 1995, and prior to the effective data of this '"cle, shall continue to be imposed only if - - - - approved by a majority vote of the voters voting in an election an the issue of the imposition,which election shall be held within two years of the effective date f this.? rticle and in compliance with subdivision (b) (d) No. local govemme_ nymay' impose, extendjor increase any special tax unless and until lr tax is submitted to the electorate and approved by a two-thirds vote. A special tax shall not be deemed to have been increased it it is imposed at a rate not higher than the maximum rate so approved. SEC. 3. Initiative Power 'r Local Taxes, Assessments. Fees and Charges. (Nerryttistan ing any other p/ision of this Constitution, including, but not limited to, %�e I'Secdons 8 and 9'the initiative power shall not be prohibited or otherwise Ii in matters of reducing or repealing any local tax, assessment, fee a. charge. The power of initiative to affect local taxes, assessments, fees and charges shall be applicable to all local governments and neither theture nor any local government f charter stall impose a signebure requirement higher than that applicable to statewide J statutory initiatives. - SECTION 4. ASSESSMENT AND PROPERTY RELATED FEE REFORM. 'sae4la�. fArdde XRR� 1F the California Constitution is herebgaddsd: rQ :1Art ; e.lP_ X111 [ d SEC 11O pacation. twitttstaNnding any other provision of law, the provisions df thisViele'shall apply to OU ��Q+m, te= and chwges)whether imposed pursuant to state DRAFT '3 - B0/07/96 14:00 Right to Vote on Taxes Act Page 3 statute or local government charter authority. Nothing in this�rticle or Article Xll shag be construed to: (a) -urovide any new authority to any agency to impose a tax. assessment, fe%or chargeolo (b) -affect existing laws relating to the imposition of fees or charges /J as a condition of property development or 0 \l (c) affect existing laws relating to the imposition of timber yield taxes. nnVULL�TJ SEC. Z Oafinitions. lo� 2 As used in this article: (a) "Agee means any local government as defined in rtiele X111C, ✓ canon t(b). (b) 'Assessment' means any levy or charge upon real property by an agency for a special benefit conferred upon the real property. 'Assessment' includes, but is not limited to, 'special assessment,' 'benefit assessment,' 'maintenance assessment' and 'special assessment tax." 'r (e) 'Capital cost' means the cost of acquisition, installation, construction, reconsttucdonn or replacement of a permanent public improvement by an agency. (d) 'District' means an area determined by an agency to contain all parcels which win receive a special benefit from a proposed public improvement or property-related service. (e) 'Fee' or 'charge' means any levy other than an ad valorem taut, a special taxtor an assessment, imposed by an agency upon a parcel or upon a person as an incident of property ownership, including causer feep or charge*for a property related service. a '\l (f) -Maintenance and operation expenses' means the cost of rent repair, replacement, rehabilitation, fuel, power, electrical curem, care, and supervision necessary to properly operate and maintain a permanent public improvement. DRAFT �! 08/07/96 14:00 V Right to Vote on Taxes Act Page 4 c/ (g) 'Property ownership' shall be deemed to include tenancies of real property where tenants are directly liable to pay the assessment, fee, or charge in question. �Y (h) 'Property-related service' means a public service Y,dving a direct relationship to property ownership. (i) 'Special beneW means a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on real property located in the district or to the public at large. General enhancement of property value does not constitute 'special benefrc." \` SEC. 3. Property Taxes. Assessments, Fees and Charges Limited. (a! N�essment. feeior charge shall be assessed by any agency upon � any parcel of property or upon arty person as an incident of property ownership except: (t) The ad valorem property tax imposed pursuant to Article XIII and Article XlljA e (2) Any s ecial eiving a two-thirds vote pursuant to)Article �, XIIt�� . �! (3) Assessments as provided by this, rticle. 11(4) Fees or charges for property related services as provided by this �Vticle. \\ (bI For purposes of this Xrticle, fees for the provision of electrical or gas service shall not be deemed charges or fees imposed as an incident of property ownership. sEc. 4. Procedures and Requiremana for Ad Assessment,. (a)AAn agency which proposes to levy an assessment shall identify all parcels which will have a special bc(txet conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed. The proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relatio iP to the entirety of the capital east of a _ public improveme ^ a maintenance and operation expenses of a pubre impmva�wm pf® the cost of the property related DRAFT S 08i07i96 14:00 Right to Vote on Taxes Act Page 5 bids service being provided. Noass shall a imposed on any parcel which exceeds the on le co of the proportional special benefit conferred on I. ly special benefits are assessable, and an agenuy Sep the general benefits from me special benefits ferred o a parcel. Parcels within a district that are owner r used any agency, the State of California or the Un' States shall not be exempt from assessment unless th agen n demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence at upi publicly owned parcels in fact receive n0 special be tfit 1��1( J- "(b) All assessments� be supported by a detailed engineers report prepared by a registered professional engineer certified by the State of California. (c) The amount of the proposed assessment r each identified parcel shall be calculated and the record o er of each parcel shall be given written notice by mail of the proposed assessmem the total amount thereof ehargeabYpar entire district, the amoun V chargeable Lo the Owners parcel, the duration of payments, the reason foressment and he basis upon which the amount of the proposed assessment was calculated, together with the date, time, and location of a public hearing on the proposed assessment. Each notice shall also include, in a conspicuous place thereon, a summary of the' procedures applicable to the completion, retumrand tabulation of the ballots required pursuant to subdivision J(d), including a disclosure statement that the existence of a majority protest, as defined in subdivision (e), will result in the assessment not being imposed. nn pentad' {o A44. �X (d) Ead+ mailed w owners of de within the distriR I coritajp�altpt es�ey S address a}a, far receipt of su allpc Once tom d by arty owner fng u notice whereby 1211 u� weer may indicate his or her name, reasonable identification of the patcelrand support or opposition to the proposed assessmerrL I t;l or, har 'dye) The agency shall conduc, q public hearing upon the proposed assessment not less than 45 days after mailing the notice of the proposed assessment to record owners of each identified parcel. At the public hearing, the agency shall consider all -proms _ against the proposed assessment and tabulate the ballots. The agency shall.not impose an assessment if there is a majority DRAFT (� 08107i98 14:0: Y Right to Vote on Taxes Act Page 6 protest. A majority protest exists if, upon the conclusion of the hearing, ballots submitted in opposition m the assessment exceed the Won; submitted in favor of the assessment. In tabulating the ballots, the ballots shall be weighted according to the proporiiunal �j financial obligation of the affected property. In In arty legal action contesting the validity of arty assessment, the burden shall be an thb agency to demonstrate that the property or properties in question receive a special benefit over and above the benefits conferred on the public at large and that the amount of arty contested assessment is proportional to, and no greater than, the benefits conferred on the property or properties in question. �(gI Because only special benefits are assessable, electors residing within the district who do not own property within the district shall not be deemed under this Constitution to have been deprived �l of the right to vote for any assessment. If a court determines that the Constibroon of the United States or otter federal law requires otherwise, the assessment shall not be imposed unless approved by a two-thirds vote of the electorate in the district in addition to being approved by the property owners as required by Son-N-o el' sob &i '45icy) SEC, S. Effective Da O ursuam the provisions of this\4rticte shall become effective the day after the election unless otherwise provided. Beginning July 1, 1997, all existing, newt or increased assessments shall comply with this \AMcle. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the following assessments existing on the effective date of thd\4jt cle shall be exempt from the procedures and approval process set forth in Section 4: (al rany assessment imposed exclusively to finance the capital Costs or maintenance and operation expenses for sidewalks, streets, newels, waver, flood carrtrdl, drainage systems or vecmr Control. Subsequent increases in sucri asseissmants-shall be subject to the procedures and approval process set forth in Section 404D Q (bl terry assessment imposed pursuant to a petition signed by the persons owning all of the parcels subject to the assessment at the _ time the assessmem is initially imposed. Subsequent increases in -44P, sugh assessments shall be subject to the procedures and approval process set forth in Section 4e Q 2 DRAFT 7 - 0fii07i96 14:02 Right to Vote on Taxes Act - y Page 7 (c) ,Any assessment the procee of which are exclusively used to repay banded indeotedn of which the failure to_pay would violate the Contract Imp ' en i Clause.df the Constitution of the `United States en o d f \\ (d) ^ny assessment which previously received ray voter approval --ftom the voters voting in an election the issue of the assessment Subsequent Increases in assessments shall be subject to the procedures and approval process set forth in Section 4. SEC. 6. Property Related Fees and Charges- v-, Procedures for New or Increased Fees and Charges. An agency shall follow the procedures pursuant to this section in imposing or increasing ✓ any fee or charge as defined pursuant to this Cie including, but not limited to, the following: ;, (1) The parcels upon which a fee or charge is proposed for imposition shall be identified. The amount of the fee or charge proposed to be imposed upon each parcel shall be calculated. The agency shall provide written notice by mail of the proposed fee or charge to the necoro'owner of each identified parcel upon which the fee or charge is proposed for imposition, the amount of-the fee or _ charge proposed to be imposed upon each, the basis upon which the amount of the proposed fee or charge was calculated, the reason for the fee or charge, together with the date, time, and location of a public heating on the proposed fee or charge. Q(Z) The agency shall conduct a public hearing upon the proposed fee or charge not less than 45 days after mailing the notice of the proposed fee or charge to the record owners of each identified parcel upon which the fee or charge is proposed for imposition. At the public hearing, the agency shall consider all protests against the proposed fee or charge. If written protests against the propasad fee or charge are presented by a majority of owners of the identified parcels, the agency shall not impose the fee or charge. (bl Requirements for Existing. New or Increased Fees and Charges. A fee or charge shall not he extended, imposed lor increased by any agency unless it meets all of the following requirements: DRAFT g 0Bi07i96 14:02 Right to Vote on Taxes Act Page 8 (�(11 Revenues derived from the fee or charge shall not exceed the funds required to provide the property related service. (2) Revenues derived from the fee or change shall not be used for any purpose other than that for which the tee or charge was imposed. (3) The amoum of a fee or charge imposed upon arty parcel or person as an incident of property ownership shall not exceed the proportional cost of the service attributable to the parcel. (� (4) No fee or charge may be imposed for a service unless that service is actually used by, or immediately available to, the owner of the property in question. Fees or charges based on potential or future use of a service are not permitted. Standby charges, whether characterized as charges or assessments, shall be classified as assessrnerrtsan4 shall not be without compliance with Section f rs \, I� (5) No fee or charge may be imposed for general govemmemel 'Lys services including, but not limited to, police, fire, ambulance or . ., library servicesgnrhere the service is available to the Public at large in substantially the same manner as it is to property owners. Reliance by an agency on any parcel maP including ut not limited to, an assessor's parcel map, may be considered a significant factor in determining whether a fee or charge is imposed as incident of property ✓ ownership for purposes of this lrticle. In any legal action contesting the validity of a fee or charge, the burden shall be on the agency to cl demonstrate compliance with this likirtcle. /\Q (c) Voter Approval for New or Increased Fees and Charges. Except for fees or charges for sewer, water, and refuse collection services, no prope related fee or charge shall be imposed or increased unless and urrol tic 4 fee or charge is submitted and approved by a maiority vote of the property owners of the Property subject to the fee or charge or, at the option of the agency, by a two-thirds vote of the electorate residing in the affected area The election shall be conducted not less than 45 days after the public h0wing. An agency may adopt procedures similar to those for increases in assessments in the conduct of elections under this �^y subdivision. (d) Beginning July 1, 1997, all fees or charges shall comply with this �SFcrion. DRAFT 9 BBi04i96 14:03 Right to Vote on Taxes Act - Page 9 ' gSECMN5. LIBERAL CONSTRUCTION. The provisions of this," shall be liberally construed to effectuate its purposes of limiting local government revenue and enhancing taxpayer consent. r SECTION 6. SEVERABIUTY. If any provision of this�14ct, or part thereof, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional, the remaining.sections shall nut be affected, but shall remain in full farce and effect and to this end the provisions of this )kct are severable. DRAFT �d .. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California P.O. Box 8127 a 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Wednesday, September 18, 1996 at 5:30 p.m. A meeting of the Executive Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Wednesday, September 18, 1996, at 5:30 p.m., at the Districts'Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT: Present: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel John Sauvajot, Ford-Sauvajot Management John J. Collins, Joint Chair Dana Smith, Executive Director, LAFCO Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair Pat McGuigan, Chair, District 1 and OMTS Chair STAFF PRESENT: George Brown, FAHR Chair Victor Leipzig, Chair, District 11 Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager Jan Debay, Chair, District 5 Blake P. Anderson, Asst. Geri. Mgr. James Ferryman, Chair, District 6 Judith A. Wilson, Asst. Genl. Mgr, John Gullixson, Chair, District 13 Gary Streed, Director of Finance Thomas Saltarelli, Chair, District 14 David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Roger Stanton, County Supervisor Corina Chaudhry, Committee Secretary William Steiner, County Supervisor Don R. Griffin, Past Joint Chair Norman Eckenrode, District 2 sent: John Cox, Jr., Joint Chair Sal Sapien, District 3 Barry Hammond, Chair, District 7 2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. l� Minutes of the Executive Committee Page 2 September 19, 1996 (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. (4) APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the June 19, 1996 Executive Committee meeting were approved as drafted. (5) REPORTS OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR. GENERAL MANAGER, AND GENERAL COUNSEL (a) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair did not report. (b) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager did not report. (c) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL Tom Woodruff reported that the Sangennano trial had been postponed until February due to request of Plaintiffs Counsel. Tom also reported that the good news was that four of the named defendants had been dismissed along with causes of action for breach of action and causes of action for deformation. (6) Discussion of LAFCO Application Re: Consolidation Don gave a brief overview of the Government Practices Oversight Committee (GPOC) report. He said that the report had been released in final form and that the group was comprised of 25 members which was an all volunteer citizen group. Subsequent to the issuance of this report, the County CEO office has developed a separate but related document entitled "External Restructuring Policy Report." Don said that he would be providing more information in the Board Letter. Item (1) Presentation by Judy Wilson Judy Wilson introduced Dana Smith and John Sauvajot. Judy Wilson reported that this is the fourth time in the past nine months that the issue of Consolidation has appeared on the Minutes of the Executive Committee Page 3 September 19, 1996 Executive Committee agenda for discussion and that she would not be presenting detailed background information. Rather, the purpose of this meeting was to review work products required for a LAFCO application and to make a formal recommendation for the September Joint Boards' meeting. Judy said the items that were going to be reviewed were the LAFCO Justification Proposal, which is the information that will be sent to interested members of the general public explaining our application, the resolution of application which would be before each individual district for action paying particular attention to Exhibit C, (the proposed Terms and Conditions) and Exhibit D, (A Plan of Services for the Consolidation of the Districts). Judy mentioned that these draft work products had been shared with LAFCO staff to be sure that they met their requirements. Before proceeding with the review and discussion, Judy first mentioned that LAFCO has the authority to amend the proposed Terms and Conditions. It was her understanding that LAFCO's Counsel had looked at the issue whether LAFCO has the authority to change the Districts' governance option and require 4730.1 rather than 4730. The answer was that they did. It was also noted the Districts can withdraw its application subsequent to the public hearing before Certification of Completion if LAFCO places terms and conditions on the application that are unacceptable to the Districts. In the event that the Districts withdraws its application, LAFCO also has the authority to initiate a consolidation of the Districts on its own. Presentation by Dana Smith Dana Smith began her presentation by commenting on how LAFCO was perceived state- wide, and mentioned that the Pringle Bill was not an isolated occurrence but rather was beginning to be the north. Ms. Smith reported that LAFCO was comprised of representatives of citizens, special districts, the County and the public member sector. Ms. Smith also commented on how decisions being made at the local level were being challenged because of the perception of too many layers of government. Ms. Smith also commented on the trend of legislature hying to resolve more local issues by legislative solutions. Dana Smith mentioned that the perception of people looking at the Sanitation Districts, which have already functionally consolidated at an operation and administrative level, is that it would not be to difficult to consolidate. A question was asked that if the Districts failed to consolidate, would LAFCO initiate consolidation. The answer was that certainly they had that option and they had all the tools to proceed as the Districts had completed its study. On the issue of terms and conditions, Ms. Smith stated that it was preferable that those options be determined by the Districts and not LAFCO, but that it could fall to LAFCO in the event of controversial issues. Dana Smith mentioned that in order to assist the cities in getting this information, they would have a 30 day period in which they would be required to provide a summary of the application and a notice of application and then a request for comment. She mentioned that Minutes of the Executive Committee Page 4 September 19, 1996 she could coordinate with Districts staff and this would help to compress the time frame. Ms. Smith was asked if a particular city did not want to proceed with the Consolidation process, did that city have any legal recourse. Ms. Smith stated that the cities would have no legal protest and couldn't force an action either way; however, LAFCO had a responsibility to review all comments. Ms. Smith also mentioned that as an alternative, the commission had the authority to amend boundaries and include and exclude agencies. Ms. Smith mentioned that the Districts should be looking at how to better structure the Districts in the future, and comparing how we can solve some of the inequities now and 20 years down the road. General Discussion by Committee Members John Gullixson mentioned that there would be a letter going out to the Districts inviting them to do a presentation to their council regarding Consolidation. He commented that he would like their council to be better informed of the Consolidation process before he votes on this issue. Most members were in favor of soliciting comments from their respective cities, however, it was noted that a vote would be taken at the September Board meeting and this would not allow much time for consultation with their respective cities. A concern for some of the Committee members, was that the Consolidation would initiate rate increases. It was noted that rate increases would not occur because of Consolidation. Judy Wilson mentioned that each District would have to vote on the Resolution of Application to LAFCO. John Collins asked about the rate structure, the reserves built up and the liability of debt account, Bonds or COPs and how those issues would be handled, and who would be handling these. The reply was that the improvement zones would take care of these issues in that it was comprised of two parts, one part to deal with the portion of rates and the second part to deal with the continuation of structure that is currently in place for debt service and that there would not be a change. Judy Wilson also mentioned that there would be one governing body handling these issues. Some of the Committee members commented that they did not feel that there was any compelling reason to move towards Consolidation, and that the Districts had bigger issues to deal with and that time and money should not be spent on this. The Committee discussed the Justification Proposal and suggested: modifying to the discussion on revenue, noting bond proceeds; underscoring the point that Consolidation will not result in an increase in user fees; and deleting the discussion on possible savings on financings. Judy Wilson indicated that she would amend the Justification proposal ( Minutes of the Executive Committee Page 5 September 19, 1996 accordingly prior to submission to the September Joint Boards meeting. After much discussion, Roger Stanton commented that he objected to the way that John Collins was conducting the meeting and that the board had already voted on this and he couldn't understand why they were discussing again at this committee. Mr. Stanton said that we should be asking ourselves whether we would have designed the Districts this way from the beginning if we had to do this all over again. John Collins accepted the criticism and replied that this meeting was just a study session and by a show of hands we would vote on the Consolidation and the Method of Consolidation and that we would be taking this formally to the September Board. By show of hands, the Committee members voted 5 to 6 with 1 abstention on the issue of Consolidation and split 5 to 5 with 2 abstentions on the issue of proceeding under 4730 or 4730.1. The question was asked whether the resolution could be modified. Tom Woodruff commented that it could be modified like any other resolution before the Boards with an amendment to the resolution. Item (2) Discussion of the Margate Construction, Inc Protest The committee asked whether the Directors were going to be allowed to assemble in Executive Session to talk about the potential liability issues before a decision is made. Tom Woodruff commented that at this point this might be a possibility, however, there is no mention of litigation from either party and that at this point it is simply determining whether the project is different than from the first time, and that the Board would be determining this. This is a no action item. Will be going to the Board for action. (7) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. (8) OTHER BUSINESS There was no other business discussion. (9) MATTERS TO BE REPORTED ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. Minutes of the Executive Committee 0 Page 6 September 19, 1996 (10) MATTERS ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT. There were none. (11) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next meeting of the Executive Committee will be at the call of the Chair. (12) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:35 p.m. Submitted by: Corina Chaudhry, Sec ery J\1YPppCIfMiF)fELBRSEPT Im MII ' AGENDA E � ; t ' f� ITEM TRANSMITTAL f Jf � i ik I q 6F52E�g^1 i1 � Y MEETING DATE dOMM 18,tirS. "`'', DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION (Initials of Originator) OMTS: PDC: FAHR: + ' All 2150, Judy Wilson, ext.2005 EXEC: 9/18/96 r # STEER ; STEER: e�,. Division No.,Name,and Extension JT.BDS:9125/96 AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Agenda Wording: LAFCO APPLICATION FOR THE CONSOLIDATION OF THE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY (All Districts): The Executive Committee forwarded the LAFCO application package and implementing resolutions to the Joint Boards for action. The Executive Committee voted 5-6-1 on the issue of Consolidation and split 5 to 5 with 2 abstentions on the issue of proceeding under 4730 or 4730.1 Recommended Action(s): 1) Forward to the Joint Boards the Resolution of application for Consolidation of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County for Districts' consideraton. CEQA REVIEW: Project Is Exempt: Not Applicable at this time DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM: Date Notice of Exemption Filed: Negative Declaration Approved on June 28, 1998 Final EIR Approved on_and Notice of Determination glad on_ BUDGET INFORMATION CURRENTYEAR CURRENT YEAR- YEAR-TO-DATE REVISED BUDGET TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.: $30,000 BUDGET AMOUNT TO-DATE allDGETBALANCE TOTAL SOURCE: JO EXPENDITURES (Tdsi 11 p 1awr Trnmm) Schedule/Line Item: $30.000 $0 $30,000 $30.000 AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: Schedule/Line Item: AITIPROJECT COST INFORMATION ORIGINAL BID, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED PROJECT PO,CONTRACT FUNDS PREV. REQUESTED THIS AMOUNT AMOUNT APPROVED AIT NA NA $15,000.00 $15,000.00 WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? YES If YES,stale number. -Permanent Limited Tenn If YES,explain In ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section CONCURRENCES: ATTACHMENTS TO AGENDA (List) To Committee: 1. Staff Report 2. Draft LAFCO Application Package Signature Date Division Manager(Or Designee) Signature Date To A. Bds.. 1. Staff Report Department Head (Or Designee) l; 2. Draft LAFCO Application Package Ii' Lei Ati _Ill Ql Sig to Date Assistant General Manager(Or Designee) OMTS COMM. PDC COMM. FAHR COMM. JOINT BOARDS Meeting Date: Approved: 'Amended:. Forwarded to* ADDITIONAL INFORMATION(Background and/or summary) See Attachment 1. ca c. Department Head AGM-Administration AGM-Operations General Manager A:1918AITWPD Page 2 of Revision: 8I1196 ATTACHMENT Staff Report LAFCO Application for the Consolidation of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County are proposing to consolidate the existing nine districts into one sanitation district The goal is to simplify the governmental structure, reduce the size of the Board, ease administrative processes, stream-line decision making procedures and consolidate some accounting and auditing functions. The new district is proposed to be formed under California Health and Safety Code Section 4730, and would be governed by a 24 member board representing local cities and sanitary districts. The new district would be called the Consolidated Sanitation District of Orange County. Background At the May 15, 1996 Executive Committee meeting, staff was directed to prepare a complete analysis of governance options for consideration, in order that the Committee and the Joint Boards could comprehensively discuss the proposed consolidation and the alternatives for formation. In response to this, staff presented a final recommendation on governance options for consolidation of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County(CSDOC)at the June 26, 1996 Joint Boards meeting. Staff recommended formation of the consolidated District under California Health & Safety Code Section 4730.1, which would include IRWD in the new Board's membership. In the ensuing discussion, two issues were considered at length: the merits of consolidation and the most appropriate code section to use to form a consolidated District. Consolidation After lengthy discussion among the Directors, a vote by district was taken whether to consolidate or not. While the majority of the districts voted to support consolidation, the opinion was not unanimous. District 6 voted in opposition to consolidation. The District 14 vote resulted in a tie and, although District 2 ended up supporting consolidation, their initial motion was to oppose the concept. Governance Further discussion followed regarding the most appropriate section of the California Health & Safety Code to use as the basis of consolidation. Under Health and Safety Code Section 4730, the governing body of the District would be made up of one representative for every existing member city, sanitary district and unincorporated portion of the county within the Districts' service area and now represented on one or more of the existing nine Districts. Board membership would decrease from 29 to 24 with the loss of double representation for the cities of Huntington Beach, Newport Beach, Yorba Linda and the County of Orange and removal of Irvine Ranch Water District as an eligible water district Staff Report: LAFCO Consolidation Application Executive Committee Meeting Page 2 member agency. Section 4730 does not provide for water district membership on the governing board. Utilizing Section 4730.1, on the other hand, would produce a larger governing body for the newly consolidated District. While no city nor the County would be entitled to two directors, water districts that are engaged in wastewater service within the District's service area would be included, namely: Irvine Ranch, Los Alamitos and Yorba Linda Water Districts. Additionally, the cities of Costa Mesa, Garden Grove and Westminster would have membership, together with the Costa Mesa Sanitary District, Garden Grove Sanitary District and Midway City Sanitary District notwithstanding that these three cities do not provide any wastewater service. Thus, the total Board membership would be 30. Following significant debate, the Districts Joint Boards of Directors voted to recommend formation of the consolidated District under Section 4730, thus reducing the governing board by five members to 24. This alternative works to reduce the public's perception of expanded governance and eliminates the double representation of jurisdictions. Furthermore, water reclamation and conservation projects can still be pursued through cooperative agreements with other agencies with common missions. Under 4730, the 24-member board would be made up of representatives from the following jurisdictions: • County (1) -County of Orange Unincorporated Area • Cities (20) Anaheim Irvine Tustin Brea La Habra Santa Ana Buena Park La Palma Seal Beach Cypress Los Alamitos Stanton Fountain Valley Newport Beach Villa Park Fullerton Orange Yorba Linda Huntington Beach Placentia • Sanitary Districts (3) Costa Mesa Garden Grove Midway City Staff Report: LAFCO Consolidation Application Executive Committee Meeting Page 3 Consolidation of CSDOC under either scenario will result in the Chairman of the consolidated District Board receiving less compensation for participation in monthly meetings. Although Board Directors would continue to receive the same$100 per meeting or day of service, for a maximum of six meetings per month, the Chairman's compensation would be significantly reduced. The Chairman currently receives a maximum of$1400 per month - $900 for the Joint Boards meeting and then $100 per any other meeting or day of service for a maximum of five additional meetings per month. Following consolidation of the Districts,the Chairman would be limited to a total of$600 per month, representing $100 per meeting or day of service for a maximum of six meetings or days per month. LAFCO Application The final action of the June 26, 1996 Joint Board meeting was to direct staff to prepare Terms and Conditions and a draft LAFCO application pursuant to Section 4730 for review at the regularly scheduled Joint Boards meeting in September 1996. This agenda item transmits the draft LAFCO application for the consolidation of the Districts. The application consists of the following documents: • Resolutions of Application: Resolutions submitted to LAFCO to initiate the review of the consolidation proposal. • Justification Proposal: A summary document stating the reasons for formation of the consolidated District and providing comprehensive background information. • Plan of Service: A detailed report describing the functions and finances of the consolidated District during its first three years of operation. • Terms and Conditions: A listing of the recommended terms and conditions that will provide the mechanism by which the ownership and operation of the current CSDOC will be transferred to the consolidated District. The terms and conditions are guided by Government Code Section 56844. • Implementation Guidelines: A document detailing the basic steps necessary to secure implementation of the District formation. • Maps and Exhibits: Maps depicting the new District's territory and the accompanying exhibits. Budget for IAFCO Review LAFCO charges a standard filing fee of$3,900.00 for each application that is submitted. Staff Report, LAFCO Consolidation Application ATTACHMENT 1 Executive Committee Meeting Page 4 This fee covers the time and material costs of up to 80 hours of staff review and processing. Staff review in excess of 80 hours, is charged on an hourly basis as are any legal costs for review of the application by LAFCO counsel. As a basis for setting a budget, CSDOC staff asked LAFCO staff to propose a budget for additional review (both staff review in excess of 80 hours and legal review). LAFCO indicated that is difficult to project the amount of additional review be needed. CSDOC staff has offered any assistance possible and will be providing all application materials on disk for LAFCO staffs use. LAFCO estimates that a budget of an $5,000.00 in addition to the filing fee would be reasonable. This is with the understanding that, if the project proves to be controversial in nature and time intensive, additional funds may be required. All costs are charged and tracked on an hourly basis. In addition to these charges there is a CEOA filling fee of $38.00 and a State Board fee of$750.00. Bond Counsel Opinion The Districts' existing Certificates of Participation (COP) permit consolidation of the districts. The COPs, however, include a covenant that requires a bond counsel opinion stating that the proposed consolidation will not effect their tax-exempt status. Staff anticipates that bond counsel review will cost approximately $5,000.00 and, pending the Joint Boards submittal of the consolidation application to LAFCO, staff will pursue securing an opinion. This brings the initial project budget to$14,688.00, Staff is requesting an initial allocation of $15,000.00 to cover the project review phase of this project. There is $30,000.00 included in the approved FY 1996/97 budget for this project Conclusion The application is presented for the Executive Committee's review, approval and recommendation to the Boards to submit the LAFCO application for the consolidation of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. r Revised:9/18/96 LAFCO Justification Proposal Consolidation of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Introduction The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County are proposing to consolidate the existing nine districts into one sanitation district. The goal is to simplify the governmental structure, reduce the size of the Board, ease administrative processes, streamline decision-making procedures and consolidate some accounting and auditing functions. The new consolidated district is proposed to be formed under California Health and Safety Code 4730, and would be governed by a 24 member board representing local cities and sanitary districts. The new district would be called the Consolidated Sanitation District of Orange County. What are the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County and what do they do? The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (Districts) is a publicly owned wastewater treatment agency that provides sewage collection, treatment and disposal services for approximately 2.24 million people in central and northwest Orange County. The Districts operate and maintain the third largest facilities of their kind west of the Mississippi River. During 1994/95, an average daily sewage influent flow of 244 million gallons per day (MGD) was treated and 510 wet tons per day of residual solids (biosolids) were produced. The Districts' service area encompasses a 470 square-mile area of Orange County that includes 23 of the County's 31 cities. The Districts' revenues are derived from service and connection fees, property tax revenues, investment interest and borrowing. The Districts is actually nine individual districts that exist independently of each other but participate together in a joint operating agreement for the operation and administration of joint facilities. The individual districts are co-participants in an agreement which was drafted in 1958 and revised in 1985 that provides for the joint construction, ownership and operation of the treatment plants, trunk sewers, pumping stations and two modem wastewater treatment plants. The Districts process wastewater from the collection systems of the various cities, water districts and local sewer agencies. They do not deal directly with individual customers except for portions of District No. 7 which are located primarily in unincorporated territory of the County. What type of facilities do the Districts own and operate? The nine member districts, acting as the Joint Facilities, own about 650 miles of major trunk CSDOC 0 V.O. Box 8127 0 Fountain Valley.CA 92728.8127 0 (714)962-2411 e Revised:9118196 sewers, 22 pumping stations and two major treatment plants with disposal facilities to safely discharge the treated effluent though an ocean outfall into deep ocean waters. Plant 1 Reclamation Plant No. 1 is located in Fountain Valley about four miles from the coast adjacent to the Santa Ana River at the 405 Freeway. It has a current operational primary treatment capacity, including standby, of 108 MGD, and secondary treatment capacity of 66 MGD. Plant 2 Treatment Plant No. 2 is located 1,500 feet from the mouth of the Santa Ana River on Brookhurst Street in Huntington Beach. It has a primary treatment capacity, including standby, of 286 MGD. Plant No. 2 provides advanced primary treatment to all of the wastewater that enters the plant and secondary treatment to up to 75 MGD of the total flow. How are the Districts funded and how are the costs allocated? The Districts have a variety of revenue sources available for operating and capital expenses. The major revenue sources are as follows: • Property Taxes • Connection Fees • User Fees • Industrial Waste User Fees • Interest Earnings • Bond Proceeds These five sources have generally accounted for more than 90 percent of the total revenue to the Districts. The importance of each revenue source varies from District to District. The Districts bond for long-tens capital improvements debt service is paid through property taxes and reserves. Each district is supported by its own budget. Collectively, the Districts utilize joint operating, working capital and capital outlay revolving accounts to pay joint operating and construction costs. These costs are subsequently allocated to the Districts based on gallons of sewage flow. The cost of new plant construction and other necessary facilities is similarly allocated to each District. The Districts also rely on a joint staff for administration, operations and maintenance. Who governs the current Districts? The Districts consist of nine independent special districts. Each district has its own board of directors, made up of mayors and members of city councils, directors of independent special Page 2 V Revised:9M9M9 districts and members of the County Board of Supervisors representing jurisdictions within that District. There are currently 29 directors. An individual may serve on more than one district board if parts of his/her agency lie within more than one District. Each board is responsible for matters related to its district, however, the boards meet as a joint board on matters of shared interest and responsibility, including the Joint Facilities. An individual district's responsibilities cannot be decided by the Joint Board, but only by the individual district's board. Why is a change being considered? Today there is growing public concern over the number of special districts serving the needs of California residents. This concern stems from the desire to improve customer service while decreasing duplicative layers of governmental bureaucracy. A change in the Districts structure is being proposed in light of the opportunities that consolidation is believed to offer. The goal of this proposed consolidation is to simplify governance structures, reduce the size of the board,ease administrative processes, streamline decision-making procedures and consolidate some accounting and auditing functions. What alternatives were considered? Basically, two alternatives were considered - to consolidate or to remain a joint operation of nine individual districts. Since its inception in 1947, the Joint Boards of Directors has reviewed the concept of consolidation several times. The 1981-82 Grand Jury issued a report recommending that the Boards consolidate the then seven Sanitation Districts into one district with Board membership based on a smaller group of elected representatives. In 1983 the Joint Boards determined that the Districts' operations were functionally consolidated under the Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement, and no significant overall benefit would accrue by reorganizing into a single district. However, a subsequent consolidation effort began in January 1995 with staff being directed to further research the issue. The results of this research have led to the current recommendation to form a consolidated district. Consolidation would complete the process of providing the existing districts joint operations with a more efficient governance and decision-making structure. Based on the recommendation to create a consolidated District, two formation alternatives were considered. The new District could be formed under either Section 4730 or Section 4730.1 of the California Health and Safety Code. These sections, their implications on formation, as well as the final recommendations, are discussed in greater detail later in this paper. What are the benefits of creating a new district? Forming a consolidated District can be seen as the final step in what the existing Districts have been working toward in the operation and administration of the Joint Facilities. While the current Districts have acted largely in a consolidated manner, they have not realized the full benefits of functioning as one consolidated agency. It is believed that the proposed Page 3 Revised:9119/99 consolidation will result in more direct and equitable governance of the wastewater system, more effective and efficient operations and administration of the treatment facilities, better use of existing resources, more opportunities for regional benefit and some modest administrative and financial savings. More Direct and Equitable Governance Currently, the nine districts are represented by nine separate and individual Boards of Directors. These nine autonomous Boards of Directors vote independently on district issues and collectively on joint works matters. While this structure ensures local governance and representation at the district level, it can become skewed and inequitable at the Joint Boards level. In several cases a city is represented on more than one of the individual district boards because city boundaries are not necessarily contiguous with district boundaries. When a Joint Works vote is taken, that city is entitled to cast a vote on each of the districts boards where it is a member. The result is that, at the Joint Boards level, jurisdictions which fall into more than one district have several votes whereas other jurisdictions, regardless of size, may only have a single voice. In addition to this inequity in representation, for a matter to be approved at a Joint Works level a majority of the individual districts boards must approve it. For example, five of the nine district boards must approve a project for it to go forward. This simple majority of boards, however, does not always reflect the tally of the individual board members voting. Due to the existence of double representation, a project may be approved by a majority of the Joint Boards, but if the vote were to be tallied based on a direct count of board members, that same project could have failed. Consolidation of the individual districts would result in a wastewater treatment system governed in a direct and unified manner. Only one consolidated board would exist and that board would be comprised of members who had one vote for their local constituencies. Board membership is discussed later in this paper. More Effective and Efficient Operations and Administration With the existence of the nine individual districts voting on joint projects, there is an inherent potential for disagreement on the operation or administration of those facilities. While the history of the Districts reflects much consensus building and accord, there is the possibility that any group of districts could disagree on the most prudent course of current or future operation of the Joint Facilities. For example, a significant opportunity to reduce the need for expanded capacity at the plants may be possible by doing some local improvements in the older collection systems that have in-flow problems. Will one District willingly agree to spend millions of dollars to correct its local problems, in order to save twice that amount for the other eight Districts? As the local infrastructure ages, these issues will become problematic. The mere potential for this type of disagreement decreases, to some extent, the ultimate efficiency or effectiveness of an organization. Whenever an agency is forced to consider the Page 4 v Revised:9119199 independent views of nine voting boards, more time and energy must be spent on the analysis, development and implementation of a project. Consolidation of the existing districts into one single District would eliminate the potential for the districts to be at cross purposes. The board would act as one entity, advancing the goals and objectives of the collective constituency. Similarly, efficiency and some level of increased effectiveness would be realized from staff serving that one single purpose, instead of directing attention to nine individual districts. Better Use of Existing Resources Although the Districts have functioned in a consolidated manner for numerous years,there are still opportunities for a consolidated agency to make better use of existing resources. By shifting the Districts' focus from the separateness of the individual agencies, the new consolidated District would be able to expend that energy evaluating new opportunities for the agency to pursue. The time and effort that would be saved on the administration of the individual districts could be spent focusing the consolidated District on larger regional issues that could produce revenue generating, cost savings or environmental benefits to the District. More Opportunities for Regional Benefit A consolidated District would be better positioned to consider and act on regional issues. The new District would represent 23 of the County's 31 cities with 90 percent of the county wide wastewater flow. A consolidated District could more effectively utilize its resources and membership to address larger regional issues such as the potential for a large scale reclamation project or alternative, lower-cost operating strategies. The size and singular consensus demonstrated by the consolidated District would facilitate regional development and coordination of wastewater related projects. Administrative and Financial Savings Administrative benefits would occur from the consolidation of some accounting and auditing procedures. While these benefits would not represent significant cost savings to the District, the benefit would be realized in a more streamlined and effective way of doing business. What would the new District do? The new District would fulfill the same mission with which the current Districts (both independently and acting as a Joint Board) are currently charged. Since the formation in 1948, the Joint Boards have been acting collectively, and functionally serving as a consolidated Board while maintaining independent District boundaries. The consolidation of the nine districts into one agency would simply clarify and expedite the new Districts' ability to meet its primary goal; to protect public heath and environment through excellence in wastewater systems. The responsibilities, obligations and future facility plans of the newly consolidated district would not change as a result of the consolidation itself. It is possible, however, that the Page 5 1� Revised:9/16/96 consolidated District would find itself in a position to better accommodate new or changing roles in wastewater management. By streamlining the Districts' mission and decreasing the administrative procedures, the new District may be better positioned to pursue new ventures that advance today's wastewater treatment or make more use of its existing resources. What would be the statutory authority of the new district and who would govern it? The new District would be formed under the California Health and Safety Code Section 4730. There was considerable discussion among staff and among Directors regarding the most appropriate section of the principal act(County Sanitation District Act)to use for formation and to determine governance. Section 4730.1 was also identified, studied and considered as a potential alternative. Under Health and Safety Code Section 4730, the governing body of the consolidated District would be made up of one representative for every existing member city, sanitary district and unincorporated portion of the county within the Districts' service area and now represented on one or more of the existing nine Districts. Board membership would decrease from 29 to 24 with the loss of double representation for the cities of Huntington Beach, Newport Beach and Yorba Linda and the County of Orange and removal of the Irvine Ranch Water District as an eligible water district member agency. Utilizing Section 4730.1, on the other hand, would produce a larger governing body for the newly consolidated District. While no city nor the County would be entitled to two directors, water districts that are engaged in wastewater service within the District's service area would be included, namely: Irvine Ranch, Los Alamitos and Yorba Linda Water Districts. Additionally, the cities of Costa Mesa, Garden Grove and Westminster would have membership,together with the Costa Mesa Sanitary District, Garden Grove Sanitary District and Midway City Sanitary District notwithstanding that these three cities do not provide any wastewater service. Thus, the total Board membership would be 30. LAFCO has recently acted to create a subsidiary district in Garden Grove, which will result in the Garden Grove Sanitary District being dissolved and replaced on the consolidated sanitation district board by the City of Garden Grove. Initially, staffs recommendation was to form the consolidated District under Section 4730.1 in an effort to be inclusive. By including the water districts, future efforts with regard to water reclamation and conservation would be facilitated. The larger Board was also preferred because it did not exclude current system participants. Even though the number of Directors would increase, it was felt that the consolidation of the nine districts into one would still produce the streamlined results desired, regardless of a slight increase in board membership. Following significant consideration, however, the Districts Joint Boards of Directors voted to recommend formation of the consolidated District under Section 4730, thus reducing the governing board by five members. This alternative would work to reduce the public's Page 6 Peimd:W19M6 perception of expanded governance and it would eliminate any double representation of jurisdictions. Furthermore, water reclamation and conservation projects could still be pursued through cooperative agreements with other agencies with common missions. Based on the Board's direction, the proposed governing Board formed under Section 4730 would include the following agencies: • County (1) -County of Orange Unincorporated Area • Cities (20) Anaheim Irvine Tustin Brea La Habra Santa Ana Buena Park La Palma Seal Beach Cypress Los Alamitos Stanton Fountain Valley Newport Beach Villa Park Fullerton Orange Yorba Linda Huntington Beach Placentia • Sanitary Districts (3) Costa Mesa Garden Grove Midway City Formation under4730 is also subject to the creation of the subsidiary district in Garden Grove as described previously in this section. The result however, would not change the total number of board membership. The only impact would be the Garden Grove Sanitary District being removed from the board and replaced by the City of Garden Grove. Are there benefits to the customers of the system? Yes, there are several benefits to the Districts' customers. The customers will benefit from a more direct governance structure, where their local representative will have a direct voting impact on the matters before the board for consideration. There no longer will be the possibility that, due to double representation or a split vote amongst the nine districts boards, decisions could be unduly influenced by a handful of officials casting multiple votes. The customers will also benefit from an improvement in service delivery. While it is not likely to be a benefit that the average resident recognizes on a daily basis, there will be an increase in overall efficiencies as a result of streamlining the nine agencies into one consolidated organization. While service delivery may not ostensibly change, the ability of the organization to use its resources more effectively will likely present opportunities of the District to enter into Page 7 R"Ised;9118196 new ventures that are central to the District's mission while working-smarter with the existing core workforce. Finally, the customer will benefit from the recognition that government has responded to the voice of the electorate and is working diligently to reduce the number of government units. This consolidation is evidence of local government responding to citizens concerns and working to make an already efficient and effective operation more responsive to the public's needs. Although the Districts have historically functioned in a consolidated manner, it is this current effort that will formally adopt the organizational changes and make them the foundation for the agency's development in years to come. Will there be a rate increase because of the consolidation? No, there will not be a rate increase as a result of the consolidation. The consolidation will provide the new District the opportunity to evaluate administration and operations of the wastewater facilities and recognize increased efficiencies wherever possible. There may be modest cost savings recognized from merging the nine individual agencies into one streamlined organization. To ensure that there are no rate impacts to the customers as a direct result of consolidation, revenue zones are proposed to be established within the consolidated District. These zones would provide the administrative mechanism for the existing debt of the different geographic areas to be kept separate and the rate schedule to remain unchanged. In future years, a consolidated board may look toward equalized rate structure where the wastewater system's infrastructure is supported by a uniform District-wide user fee. That, however, is not proposed at this time and is not part of the consolidation application. What are the environmental impacts? Because the Districts have been functioning in a consolidated manner for years, no negative environmental impacts are anticipated. The consolidated District would have an identical territory as the existing Districts, and the current permits guiding the Districts operations would remain in place, monitoring the actions of the consolidated District. One likely benefit, however, is that the consolidation may provide the consolidated District with the opportunity to strive for even more successes with regard to environmental sensitivity and stewardship. Since the individual districts would now be governed by one regional body, local concerns would be combined with regional awareness, potentially increasing the level and effectiveness of the District's proactive environmental compliance. The existing Districts have an outstanding record of environmental stewardship in Orange County and, as part of the agency's mission, strives for excellence in wastewater treatment. Any resulting benefit from the consolidation of the Districts would complement this record of environmental awareness and success. Page 8 r Revised:BHBIBB When would the Districts consolidate? The consolidation of the Districts could happen any time after the IAFCO approval process has been completed. It is proposed, however, that consolidation be implemented July 1, 1997 to be consistent with the start of the new fiscal year. Because much of the impact of the consolidation will be on administrative matters, this fiscal year end transition, would facilitate the necessary changes from the Districts' current accounting and administrative procedures. The Districts are in the process of selecting and implementing a new Financial Information System; the July 1, 1997, consolidation date would complement the intent to have the new General Ledger system in place at that time. Where can I get more Information about this proposal? The proposed consolidation of the Districts is discussed in further detail in the County Sanitation Districts of Orance County Final Consolidation Reoort prepared by Ford Sauvajot Management Group, Inc. This report is on file with the Districts and is available for review. It is also included in the Districts' application to LAFCO for consolidation. Page 9 P i RESOLUTION NO. INITIATING PROPOSAL TO CONSOLIDATE DISTRICTS A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. _ APPLYING TO THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION FOR CONSOLIDATION OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA, PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 56000, ET SE( . WHEREAS, the County Sanitation Districts were originally organized in 1954 as separate districts providing sewer services, generally following the drainage patterns of Orange County; and WHEREAS, Orange County's sewer system is now well-established and the current main focus of the nine districts is on joint projects and the attendant regulatory issues; and WHEREAS, over the years, the maintenance of the nine districts as separate entities has contributed to certain administrative and financial burdens; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Part 3 of Division 3 of Title 5 of the Government Code, known as the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985 ("the Act"), certain local agencies may submit a request to the Local Agency Formation Commission for a change of organization or a reorganization; and WOODRUFF,SPR LM&SMART Sc,m ,3, 1996 1 v WHEREAS, County Sanitation District No. _ is a local agency authorized to make such a proposal; and WHEREAS, "consolidation" is one type of change of organization or reorganization permitted by the Act, defined as the uniting or joining of two or more districts, formed pursuant to the same principal act, into a single new successor district; and WHEREAS, notice of intent to adopt this resolution of application has not been given to each interested and each subject agency; and WHEREAS, the territory proposed to be consolidated is inhabited; and WHEREAS, in the interest of streamlining administration and board procedures, maintaining financial and other records, and reducing costs, it has been determined by the districts that the proposed consolidation will effect substantial administrative benefits and financial savings, both individually and collectively. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: This proposal for a change of organization is made pursuant to Part 3 of the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985. Section 2: The change of organization proposed herein is the consolidation of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 into a single County Sanitation District. 1ll000 n WOODRUFF,SPRADLW&SMART SCOL 1 -2- Sepwm r S, 1996 Section 3: The boundaries of the affected nine districts are as depicted in Exhibit "A", attached. The boundaries of the proposed consolidated district are as depicted in Exhibit "B", attached. Section 4: Terms and conditions of the proposed consolidation regarding consolidation of assets and financial obligations are set forth on Exhibit "C", attached. Section 5: The number and method of selection of members of the governing board shall be as provided in California Government Code section 4730. Section 6: The following person is to be furnished with copies of the report by the executive officer and to be given mailed notice of the hearing on the proposal: Donald F. McIntyre General Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92708-7018 Section 7: This proposal is to be considered a formal request that proceedings for consolidation be taken pursuant to part 3 of the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985. Section 8: A plan for providing services within the affected territory is attached as Exhibit "D". PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held 1996. 2000 32 W DRUFF,SPR LW&SMART 3 1_I -3- Scpmm er 3, 1996 EXHIBIT "A" MAP OF CURRENT BOUNDARIES OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13, AND 14 2000-WO]2 Wp DAUFP,SPRADL &SMART ]A011 1 -4- ScPIsmM�3, 1996 LOS ANGELES COUNTY Oq�9 LA HABRA ry GF, u.wnno Ge `Ti 9��b B EA Y ON uw YORBA 7$ 9 I LACENTIA LINDA ?'� I 2a.�kmclI ..e yy` LApUENA ,LaF' PALM Gy ANAHEIM VILLA O •.. CYPRE S I 9 1PARK "LOS ROS a STANTON y RAN E §J GARDEN GRO S STMIhlSTFnm.mnMn B O Tu 11 F sAN7 14 8 )UNTA110 , new ALLEY I 8 HU IN N PACIFICOCEAN MBA IRVINE O` 5 s NEWPORT BEACH IIt^II^ u N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 EXHIBIT "B" MAP OF PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF CONSOLIDATED DISTRICT 200MM32 WOODRUFF,SPRADLIN&SMART 3 1 1 -5- SeP��er 3, 1996 LOS ANGELES COUNTY ^ LA HAW BRA [9dWryBe'9Y 15 9 B EA 3 OLH� L ON � .w YORBA y �.. LACENTIA LINDA 4 sz CO 0y LA `LIE A 1 PALM p PA K ANAHEIM y a w.ioI CYPRESS I VILLA O LOS STANTON 1p PARK LAMITOS PI I RANdE ` s 9 GARDEN GRID I�lS .ws+w.w�Aw I S B y SANT' ANA P FDUNTA .✓u.� VALLEY HU IN N PACIFIC A' COST OCEAN MESA IRVINE 9 NEWPORT BEACH N SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1195 EXHIBIT "C" TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF PROPOSED CONSOLIDATION 200 32 WOODRUFF,SPRADLW&SMART SW21 1 -6- S p¢mb.r 1, 1996 LAFCO Application Terms 8r Conditions Consolidation of County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 1. The nine separate districts known jointly as the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC) shall be consolidated into one single County Sanitation district pursuant to the County Sanitation District Act (California Health and Safety Code section 4730 and shall be named the Consolidated Sanitation District of Orange County (District). [G.C. 56844(v)] (As used herein, "CSDOC" refers to the nine Districts both jointly, singly and in any combination.) 2. As a result of consolidating, the nine existing districts shall be dissolved and be reorganized as one consolidated District with one consolidated Board of Directors under California Health and Safety Code Section 4730. At the time of consolidation the Board of Directors would include representatives from the following jurisdictions (G.C. 56844(n)]: County (1) - County of Orange Unincorporated Area Cities (20) Anaheim Irvine Tustin Brea La Habra Santa Ana Buena Park La Palma Seal Beach Cypress Los Alamitos Stanton Fountain Valley Newport Beach Villa Park Fullerton Orange Yorba Linda Huntington Beach Placentia Sanitary Districts (3) Costa Mesa Garden Grove Midway City 3. Directors of the district shall be compensated in accordance with applicable state law. 4. All system facilities shall be transferred from CSDOC as of the effective date of consolidation in an "as-is" condition, without any payment or repair obligation from CSDOC. [G.C. 56844(k)(v)] 5. All lands, buildings, real and personal property, assets and appurtenances held by CSDOC as of the effective date of the consolidation shall be transferred to the District. Such assets are enumerated in the CSDOC 3000 31 WOODRUFF,SPRADUN&SMART 3 11 -7- Scptcm cr 3, 1996 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the year ending June 30, 1995. (G.C. 56844(b)] 6. The District shall be designated as the successor to CSDOC and retain all of the rights, duties and obligations of the former CSDOC with respect to enforcement, performance or payment of any outstanding bonds, contracts or obligations of the former CSDOC. [G.C. 56844(m)] 7. All previously authorized charges, fees, assessments and/or taxes currently in effect by CSDOC shall be continued by the District. [G.C. 56844(t)] 8. The formation of Special Zones within the District, pursuant to California Health & Safety § 4850, are to collectively include the entire service area and individually include the specified areas as shown on the attached map. The Special Zones shall continue the existing rate structures from the CSDOC districts until such time as the District Board of Directors may find it appropriate to make revisions. [G.C. 56844(e)] 9. The District shall assume all joint use flow agreements and maintenance agreements. The terms and conditions of all contracts existing on the effective date of consolidation, between and among the Districts, or any of them, shall remain in full force and effect and shall be ratified by the Board of Directors at the first meeting of the new District. All contracts between the Irvine Ranch Water District and one or more County Sanitation Districts, including those relating to ownership of capacity rights in treatment, disposal and sewer facilities shall be assigned to the new District and remain in full force and effect. All contracts between County Sanitation District No. 14 and one or more County Sanitation Districts shall also be assigned to the new District and remain in full force and effect. 10. CSDOC shall transfer any and all indebtedness and the levying for payment purposes of taxes, surcharges, assessments, rental or rates to the new District. [G.C. 56844(c)] 11. CSDOC shall file a statement with LAFCO that the reorganization shall not adversely affect or impair the status of any employee of CSDOC or the District. As of the effective date of this reorganization, all employees of CSDOC shall become employees of the District. Rates of pay, accrued vacation and sick leave, vacation and sick leave accrual rates, employee rights, insurance, retirement benefits, and all other benefits and programs shall be transferred over to the District at then-current levels. Memoranda =ppp.ppp32 WOODRUFF,SPRADLW&SMART 9 1 -8- Seppmm cr 3, 1996 of Understanding in place under CSDOC shall be transferred and assigned to the new District. [G.C. 56844(I)] 12. Permits issued to CSDOC shall be transferred and assigned in full force and effect to the new District. The new District shall be authorized to assume all rights, responsibilities and duties as contained within the permits and to continue operations without interruption. Such permits shall include but not be limited to the District's National Pollution Discharge Elimination System Permit, including a waiver for full secondary treatment pursuant to Section 301(h) of the Federal Clean Water Act, and all other air and land permits. [G.C. 56844(v)] 13. Permits issued by CSDOC shall be transferred and assigned in full force and effect to the new District. The new District shall be authorized to assume all rights, responsibilities and duties contained in said permits and in the laws authorizing the issuance of said permits. Such permits shall include but not be limited to Sewer Connection Permits and Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permits. [G.C. 56844(c)] 14. The consolidated District shall assume all contracts and obligations current and pending of CSDOC. [G.C. 56844(m)] 15. The effective date of this consolidation shall be July 1, 1997. [G.C. 56844(p)] 200 M32 WOODRUFF,SPRADLW&.SMART 3C 11 -9- Sepmm cr 3, 1996 9661 'E ngwaida5 _Ol_ 1 IipVC Ia WST w'l dS'ddaWG M zmoo-o O lISIHX3 Ol1N3WH3V11V S3NOZ -lVI03dS d0 dVW LOS ANGELES COUNT/ N LA HABRA n d � zm ro6 EA L ON YORBA LACENTIA LINDA '��, fi 9s E 11 z F� yy LA BUE14A �v0 PALM PA. K yOy ANAHEIM VILLA O w.ae CV PRESS PARK OrtO sx STANTONLAM st 4 e RAN E E O C 3 xae $ 9 IT N 3 GRO STMI S y wma mx me ':. e ff 'a� 7 x Tus 11 9ANt " 14 a F UNTA ALLEY HU N N PAC n o• PACIFIC COST ocEAN MESA IRVINE b° 1 ® B NEWPORT BEACH BEACH IAA^ u N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS . s. . OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM•CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 LOS ANGELES COUNTY ,^ wma gF LA HABRA nd '> 1S CFC90 'yY .1b EA n my ON YOR' 13 ""� uwwx LINDA 9LF LACENTIA O� r IM �5 LA BUENA �v¢ PALM PA K ANAHEIM < .. . CY RE S I '� ARK ,Q LAMS S 5 STANTON tl E E OHO u..., TMI S B 7 u r. OSarnia F UNTA .... ALLEY q HU N N o... PACIFIC OCEAN OS A IRVINE C 5 r�s NEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS . OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 LOS ANGELES COUNTY F LA BRA B EAy� xw uw uuwiw. ON YOREA 1.9 LACENTIA LINDA qo E5 D r VILLA C eSls C R n .`: w PARK ,rj STANTON; I m E a s fa $3 ' CARD N "< d 4a ran Y'w GRO B 7 .NR 5 F`3`3' R O S SANA �Y 1 2 ALLEY `,i i eH�f N' UN:TNO PACIFIC COSTA OCEAN MESA IRVINE i O S NEWPORT BEACH �IIAII^ u N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS . .. OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM•CLR.CDR CSDOC M5 LOS ANGELES COUNTY .rn°x q�FF LA HABRA r-�d "W R'ry GFc�~ry��Ml- M ON �r�xauw 13 YORBA LACENTIA LINDA 9iF 2 Fe' ° ULA IA E A °o PALM .A K Gy ANAHEIM VILLA O uuim CY RE S ° w PARK LOS STANTON LAMITO s O I S S a E eg `s § ys' GA N GRO IS S xewrxnrn ve nm er B 7 i Tus O 6SANT 14 ANA 8 F UNTA ALLEY HUN IN N ++ .nn PACIFIC COST OCEAN MESA IRVINE NEWPORT= BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS d OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM•CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 LOS ANGELES COUNT' �Fy� ...me '✓ LA HABRA B EA 3 G� ON aeuum.nw YORBA 13 LACENTIA LINDA 92�, e .e 2 LA UE 00 PALMA PAF K ANAHEIM n CV IRE SS VILLA O PARK LAMITOS s 1 STANTON Q e RAN E y GARD GRO I S g 3g nr.na ve B j 1O 7 TUS SANT e� 14 11 � ANA woe,.e s' UNT e • ALLEY e HUN N�Aa4 OCIFIC EAN ... ETA IRVINE ONEWPORT BEACH �IIAII^ u N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1195 LOS ANGELES COUNTY wwmv HB LA HABRA . wm F90 wwu... ,y .1b B EA O� ON YORBA 13 LACENTIA LNDA 92t„ w eme we 2LA OF p513UE A �04Y PALMA PA K yO0 w.ro CY R SANAHI VILLA LOS O PARK LAMITOSs 9 STANTON C RAN E GAR GRO STMI S S nmwme n nmrt y# ,? '' 3, B O :via rya; fw, 11 SANT v 14 F UNTA .... ALLEYi HU N N O � s PACIFIC m.•n OCEAN COSTA IRVINE t O NBEACH BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1195 LOS ANGELES COUNTY �. m a. w ~B LA H`ABRA B EAum yry ree..uw.nw 3 L ON YORBA 13 9 LACENTIA LINDA M M 9 LA UE AE 2 � Oo �Gvy PALM WA. K Oy ANAHEIM I VILLA O CYPREis I .c PARK LOS STANTON e LAMITOS O ° z RAN E 3 GAR D N GRO 1 S wErtws�a nma B 3E O U3 7 11 SANT 14 ANA ,..m..s " F UNTA ALLEY F,« -rHU N PACIFIC E OCEAN COSTA IRVINE 5 NEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS d __ OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDH CSDOC 1/95 LOS AWELES COUNTY S „wrnen w O9�Bt. LA HyABRA NO gtiy B FA �u L ON voeea � 13 I LACENTIA LINDA O CO 0 UE 4A Vy LA PALM PAF K Oy ANAHEIM •• y, uurm CY RE I VIL LA O •• 1+ i•. LOS PARK STANTON ; " LAM ROS O I I s RAN E GARD GRO O. TUS SA_NT F UNTA ALLEY HU . NGT&N .vue. PACIFIC ua„.ve OCEAN COSTA IRVINE �4 g 1 r Or NBEAC BEACH u N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 LOS AN ELES COUNTY Q� H LA HABRA 4� `syC `�Ary i..wlu..vwnw Rc� �4b B EA Mf 13 YORBA ,P LACENTIA LINDA 9 2LA y� U A 4r PALM PA K c� ANAMEIM 10 uuim CY RE S VILLA 10 PARK LAMITO t S STANTON e, RAN E r`• GAR N GRO TMI S .. a B 7 r 3 i UNT ALLEY t HUN INGITN Asa . ... � � 7 PACIFIC OCEAN MESA IRVINE a s s 5 ' NEWPORT BEACH IIIA' u N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 9661 'E-Tvrd-s -IT- I lZ lwmsv M'Ia S'Aanv000M ZCOW-OWZ 10RI1SI0 03lVOIIOSN00 O3SOcIONd 3Hl NIHlIM S301ANBS d0 NOISIAOad 3Hl MOd NV ld ..a., IISIHX3 Plan of Services for the Consolidation of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 1, INTRODUCTION This Plan of Services has been prepared pursuant to Government Code Section 56653, which requires that a plan for providing services within the affected territory be provided whenever an application for a change of organization is submitted to LAFCO. This document will facilitate the consolidation of the nine (9) existing County Sanitation Districts of Orange County(CSDOC)into one single County Sanitation District pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 4700 et seq. The resulting consolidated agency shall be named the Consolidated Sanitation District of Orange County (District). This consolidation proposes a transfer of all duties, responsibilities and liabilities of CSDOC to the District The Plan of Services provides a description of CSDOC and its operations and how they will be consolidated as the District IL D .CCREMON OF CSDOC A. General Information The CSDOC is made up of nine independent special districts. Each district is a political subdivision of the State of California and is governed by a representative of each city and sanitary district within the district and,if the District includes unincorporated territory, a member of the Orange County Board of Supervisors. Each district has its own budget All districts except District Nos. 13 and 14 have thew own tax rate and trunk sewer systems. District No. 13 buys capacity in the other districts' transmission facilities. A Joint Administrative Organization was formed in 1948 to administer the business of the jointly owned treatment and disposal facilities and the activities common to all districts. This is provided for in a Joint Ownership Operation and Construction Agreement. The day-today operation of the organization is under the direction of a General Manager,two assistant general managers, seven department heads, for an authorized staff of 624 positions(616 FTE's)for the Fiscal Year 1996-97. B. Types of Services,Level,and Range of Service Currently Provided The CSDOC is a single-purpose public entity formed solely for the collection, treatment and disposal of wastewater and its residuals and serves the wastewater collection, treatment and disposal needs of approximately 2.2 million people. During 1994-1995,an average daily sewage influent flow of 244 million gallons per day(MGD)was treated and 510 wet tons per day of residual solids(biosolids)was produced CSDOC encompasses a 470 square-mile area of Orange County that includes 23 of the County's 31 cities. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Page I Ford Sauvajot Management Group,Inc. C2000FlanServdoe 919196 CSDOC operates the third largest wastewater management agency of its kind west of the Mississippi, with assets valued at more than one billion dollars. The nine individual districts own about 650 miles of major trunk sewers, 22 pumping stations and two major treatment plants with disposal facilities to safely discharge the treated effluent through an ocean outfall into deep ocean waters. The treatment plants process an average of more than 244 million gallons of wastewater per day. Reclamation Plant No. 1 is located in Fountain Valley. It has a current operational primary treatment capacity, including standby, of 108 MOD and a secondary treatment capacity of 66 MGD. Treatment Plant No. 2 is in Huntington Beach. It has a primary treatment capacity, including standby, of 286 MOD. Plant No. 2 provides advanced primary treatment to all of the wastewater that enters the plant and secondary treatment to up to 75 MGD of the total flow. Table 1 highlights the service area characteristics and wastewater system features. Table 1 Service Area Joint Works Facilities As of June 30, 1995 Total Population Served(estimated) 2,275,000 Service Area(estimated) 470 square miles Total Number of Cities Served 23 Total Miles of Trunk Sewers 650 Number of Pumping Stations 22 Number of Treatment Plants 2 Reclamation Plant No. 1 Rated Capacity 108 MGD Treatment Plant No. 2 Rated Capacity 286 MGD Total Rated Capacity 394 MGD Reported Average Daily Flow Reclamation Plant No. 1 84 MGD Treatment Plant No. 2 160 MOD Total Average Daily 244 MGD Flow C. Description of Sanitary Sewer System CSDOC processes wastewater from the collection systems of the various cities, water districts and local sewer agencies. They do not deal directly with individual customers except for portions of District No. 7, which is located primarily in unincorporated territory of the County. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Page 2 Ford Souvajot Management Group,Inc. CSDOCtPIsmServ.doc 9191% CSDOC's assets consist of individual district assets and each district's respective share of jointly owned assets. Table 2 summarizes the respective District ownership in jointly owned and separately owned property, plant, equipment and construction in progress, at cost, as of June 30, 1995: Table 2 District Ownership Jointly(honed Separately (honed Total Total property, plant,and equipment $742,677,706 $304,190,579 $1,046,868,285 Less accumulated depreciation $282,776,401 Net property,plant and equipment $764A91.884 D. Additional Assets In addition to its real property and facilities, CSDOC owns service vehicles, equipment, tools, repair parts inventory, and communications and office equipment. CSDOC maintains cash, liquid securities to meet its cash flow requirements, and other reserves. The following table summarizes the districts' reserves budgeted for the end of Fiscal Year 1996-97. Table 3 Reserves Analysis "Dry Period"Operating Cash Flow $29,543,000 Operating Contingency Reserve 11,811,000 Debt Service Reserves Fund Balance 55,641,000 Capital Reserves 48,064,000 Environmental Requirements Reserves 5,000,000 Capital Share(Flood/Earthquake Reserves) 75,758,900 Operating share(Flood/Earthquake Reserve) 117,345,500 Total $343,163,400 E. Liabilities As of June 30, 1996, CSDOC liabilities included debt in the amount of approximately $408,255,000. These issues include $408,210,000 of Certificates of Participation (COP) and $45,000 of general obligation(0.0.) bonds. The Districts have maintained their AA. rating from Standard and Poor's Corporation and As rating from Moody's Investor Services,although all COP issues are backed by issuance of letters of credit and are rated AAA. No new COP issues are budgeted for Fiscal Year 1996-97. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Page 3 Ford Sauvajot Management Group,Inc. CSD0C1PIanServ.dac 9/9/96 The Fiscal Year 1996-97 Budget provides for $35,973,000 to service the debt on the various COPS issued. In addition, there is a $15,000 annual payment to maturity in January 1999 for the G.O.bonds in District No. 11. In addition, the districts have booked, as of June 30, 1995, over $2.5 million in compensated absences potential liabilities. Further, there are claims and judgments payable amounting to$541,000. CSDOC's funds are adequate to cover these obligations. Consolidation of the districts will have no impact on the liabilities of CSDOC. Under consolidation into a single County Sanitation District,the new County Sanitation District assumes all predecessor district obligations. Further,the districts are presently joined by agreement to manage and fund liabilities. The new consolidated District will establish special zones upon consolidation to continue differential user fees and to ensure that predecessor districts' outstanding debt is serviced by only those residents who originally assumed that debt. The boundaries of each zone will be the same as those of each predecessor district. The new consolidated District will establish nine (9) zones to differentiate and account for costs, revenues and liabilities of the existing districts. In addition, an Improvement District (ID) could be formed coincident with each predecessor district's service area to enable proper segregated accounting for the retirement of the existing Certificates of Participation (COPS) debt. As new future borrowing may occur, new ID's would be formed to include the service area benefiting from the projects. Such new ID's would not necessarily have boundaries congruent with the zones. For projects at the treatment plants, however,an ID to include all of the new District's service area could be formed to properly allocate the cost of such improvements that would benefit all the zones. It is also expected that the consolidated District would continue the practice of dedicating Ad Valorem Taxes where it would be collectable within a zone to the retirement of long-term debt of an appropriate ID. F. Management and Employees CSDOC presently operates in a consolidated fashion pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code Section 4840 et seq. CSDOC currently employs approximately 616 fdl-time employees. Legal Services are provided by the law firm of Woodruff, Spradlin and Smart auditing services are also provided by contract. In addition, various other services are contracted-out, as appropriate, throughout the Fiscal Year. These include such varied services as groundskeeping, environmental review, ocean research and reporting, etc. CSDOC's organization chart is included in CSDOC's Fiscal Year 1996-97 Budget which is submitted along with this application. The existing net joint operation budget for Fiscal Year 19%-97 is $48,700,000. The principal functional units are as follows: County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Page 4 Ford Souvajot Management Group,Inc. CSDOCVtaaSM doc 9N196 Fiscal Year 1996-97 General Manager's Department $1,814,760 Human Resources Department 2,213,610 Finance Department 3,489,030 General Services Department 6,403,160 Operations and Maintenance Department 30,105,950 Technical Services Department 7,935,860 Engineering Department 787,630 Total $52,750,000 Less Joint Operating Revenues (4,050,000) Net Joint Operating Expenses $48,700.000 Consolidation of the districts into a single District would result in the continuation of management and operational structures and functional expenditures similar to those described above. Operations of the new District would remain the same as the current operations of CSDOC. Consequently, there would be no change in employee compensation and employee benefits as adjustments would not be required. The transition from the existing joint operation to a single District operation would have no impact on employees,their occupational status, or their benefits. G. Rates and Charges Each district, except District No. 14, has an adopted Sanitary Sewer Service Fee to provide funding for operating the sewer systems in accordance with the Clean Water Act and CSDOC's Revenue Program. District No. 14 is funded through user fee charges to the Irvine Ranch Water District. Sanitary Sewer Service Fees are set annually by each district after a review of projected needs. For Fiscal Year 1996-97, as for the past five years, fees have not been raised. Current annual single family residential Sanitary Sewer Service Fees are as follows by district: District No. I $83.24 District No. 2 71.52 District No. 3 73.89 District No. 5 96.75 District No. 6 76.47 District No. 7 50.09 District No. 11 60.00 District No. 13 100.00 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Page 5 Ford Sauvajot Management Group,Inc. CSDOC%PIanServ.doe 919/96 As was indicated previously, establishment of special zones upon consolidation would continue differential Sanitary Sewer Service Fees. Consolidation is expected to facilitate reorganizing and streamlining the new District's operations. H. Summary of Revenues and Expenses The CSDOC Fiscal Year 1996-97 Budget, which is included in this application package, contains detailed information regarding revenues and expenses. Attention is called to Section 3,pages 1-14,of the Budget document for summary information. 11L DESCRIPTION OF THE CONSOLIDATED DISTRICT A. General The nine independent County Sanitation Districts currently collectively known as CSDOC and which utilize joint operating, working capital and capital outlay accounts to pay joint operating and construction costs, will be consolidated into a single County Sanitation District pursuant to the California County Sanitation District Act (Health and Safety Code Section 4700 et seq.). The boundaries of the consolidated District will be the same as the outer boundaries of those nine predecessor districts. B. Types of Services,Level and Range of Services The new District will assume all duties, responsibilities and liabilities of the former CSDOC. The District will own and operate the wastewater treatment system which provides sewage collection,treatment and disposal services currently owned and operated by the nine(9) Sanitation Districts known jointly as CSDOC. C. District Structure The District's organization will be the same as that structure which presently exists under the CSDOC joint operating agreement for the operation and administration of the joint facilities. D. Governing Board Composition The new District will be formed under California Health and Safety Code Section 4730. Under Health and Safety Code Section 4730, the governing body of the consolidated District would be made up of one representative for every existing member city, sanitary district, and unincorporated portion of the County within the District's service area. Board membership would decrease from 29 to 24 with the loss of double representation for the Cities of Huntington Beach, Newport Beach, and Yorba Linda and the County of Orange and removal of the Irvine Ranch Water District as an eligible water district. E. Three Year Budget of the Consolidated District It is anticipated that revenues and expenditures which would have been budgeted by CSDOC for the operation and administration of joint facilities and the construction of capital improvements will be the basis for the new District's financial plan. Attachment County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Page 6 Ford Sauvajot Management Group,Inc. CSDOCWIenSe".doc 9NN6 A is a 3-year projection of the District's budget under consolidation. The projection covers Fiscal Years 1997-98, 1998-99,and 1999-2000. Attachment B is a summary of anticipated capital improvements for the new District. This summary of capital needs was derived from CSDOC's Joint Works Capital Improvements budget prepared under assumptions included in the 30-year Facilities and Expansion Plan("2020 Vision"approved by the Joint Boards of Directors in 1989). IY._ IMPACTS ON CUSTOMERS There will be no negative financial impact on customers. No rate changes are anticipated as a result of the consolidation. Please refer to previous discussion regarding the formation of special zones. Y� IMPACTS ON OTHER AMISDI TION There will be no service level impacts on any of the cities, sanitary districts, and other agencies presently relying on services provided by CSDOC as the services responsibilities, without modification, will transfer to the new District upon the effective date of consolidation. Effective date is proposed as July 1, 1997. YL IMPACTS ON REGIONAL PARTICIPATION All CSDOC's contractual obligations will transfer to the new District upon the effective date of consolidation. Accordingly,there are no anticipated impacts. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Page 7 Ford Souvajot Management Group,Inn. CSDOCWIanSemdoe 9t9796 8/19/96 Consolidated Sanitation Distrct of Orange Coun Projected Budoets Fiscal Years 1997.98 Thru 1999-2000 1997-98 1998.99 1999-2000 Revenues Industrial/Commercial Use Fees $ 6,678,000 $ 7.680,000 $ 8,832,000 Sewer Service Fees 64,586,000 65,617,000 67.799,000 Fees From Other Agencies 7,150,000 6,000,000 6,100,000 Connection Fees 5,784.000 7,510,000 9,404,000 Interest 20,752.000 22,565,000 24,583,000 Miscellaneous&Other 2.350,000 2,350,000 2,350,000 Property Taxes 30,986.000 30,971.600 30,971.000 New COP Issues 60,800.000 57,000,000 54,000,000 Total Revenues $ 199.086.000 $ 199,693,000 $ 204,039,000 Reauirentents Collection System O&M Expenses $ 10,002.000 $ 10,522,000 $ 10,229.000 Treatment System O&M Expenses 53,724,000 54,717,000 55.730,000 Collection System Improvements 11,717,000 16,769,000 16,675,000 Treatment System Improvements 59,791,000 38,024,000 39,982,000 GO Bond Principal& Interest 16,000 16.000 - Costs of New COP Issuance 3,040,000 2,850,000 2,700,000 COP Service& Retirement 34,491,000 40,067,000 45,227,000 Total Expenses $ 172,781,000 $ 162,955,000 $ 170M3.000 Revenue Exceedina Ex efL nses $ 28,305,000 $ 36,738.000 $ 33,496,000 Beginning Cash Balances 343,163,000 369,468,000 406,206,000 Ending Cash Balances $ 369,468,000 $ 406,206,000 $ 439,702,000 Appropriations. Dedications & Reserves "Dry Period"Operating Cash Flow $ 29,840.000 $ 30,597.000 $ 31,060,000 Operating Contingency Reserve 11.936,000 12,237,000 12,381,000 Capital Projects Completion 50,000,000 50,000,000 50,000,000 Environmental Requirements Reserve 5,000,000 6.000,000 5,Oo0,000 Required Debt&COP Service Reserves 36,039,000 38,872,000 41,572,000 "Dry Period"COP Service Cash Flow 15.789,000 19.186,000 17,998,000 Property&Liability Catastrophe Reserve 220.864,000 250,314.000 281,691,000 $ 369,468,000 $ 406.206,000 $ 439,702,000 Unappropriated Cash & Investment Balances $ - $ $ CONSBUD.XLS Consolidated 9:58 AM AhachmenlB County Sanitation District No. 1 Schedule of District Collection System Projects CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A B C D E F O N I J N L TOTAL COST SIMO0 BUDGET ESTRED ESTREO EST RED EST REO FIVE EST 6YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 IN PROGRESS 183647 196748 1"" 1M0.2000 "00.2001 YEAR TOTAL 20013006 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE 1.Seme Me Tlw4 Mme"ROO.(B) 6.500.000 0,500,000 6,500.000 2.MBFeMneees Pro" 1350. 125.000 125,000 125.000 125.000 125,000 625,000 625,000 l.mooc TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ].]0.000 126.0% 125,000 125.000 125.0001 125,000 828000 ]125000 ]]SO PORTION FUNDED BY DISTRICT 1.MASTERAANNEO FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION S.MASTER.nANNEDFhDUTMSPRESENTLY UNDER DESIGN S.MASTERA NEOFA WIESSLNEDULEDFDRFUTUREWSIGNORCONSTR1 lON County Sanitation District No. 2 Schedule of District Collection System Projects CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A 0 L D E F G H I J K L TOTAL COST (BOMB BUDGET EST RED EST REO EST RED EST REG FIVE EST 5 YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 202D IN PROGRESS 199&9), 1997-28 1998-99 1999-3000 3000-2m1 YEAR TOTAL 2001-2006 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE I.Repare Eudle Remt Tone Sower.PB Ito Em"er 6.500. 6.5W,Wo Si GO.OGo 2.Repacemenl of Nwkhope Plarentu Tmnk,2-3R 6.2W.W0 250.000 3.000.000 3.OW.OW 6,2w.= 6,260, 3.Replacement of Cypau Am.Supmnk, Z<R 5.250.IX3 2W.W0 250.000 Eoco,000 5,26G, a.Aloseuxoent of YwN Linea noon,Station 100,0.V SOWO 50.003 50,000 lco.00cl 5.Ta91mmtgXor Sever,233(3) 1.800. IAOO.000 1.800,NG 6.91 Faewoy MeninB Project.2-TA loSoce, 15,DA So'coo 90.000 WOOD T.BOIsi Gower RMMf(3) 460,0130 060,000 460.000 8.B01evlkilnooln Trunk RelN1(3) 3M.OW 325,W0 325.W0 325.W] 9,Sana Me Roper lnV Narrows BAcows.2-1L5Rt"• <.3T1.OW 37 I.W0 150.Guo I.000,Wo 2.WW W 0.0 050.0 <,WO.m < Wg,O . p 10.Some Me RIVer Into IS Food,,2.31... 13.561, fN.WJ 2W,OW 25C,W0 3WOAW 5.000.000 8,500,000 Em.000 13.SOD000 11.1.5 Process YNN9 Pf.0d.,2.15 109.000 coo 25,00 W W0 p 25,000 25, 0 25.000 1W, 100.00 12.Pump Sleoo RMWs.2-37'• LW W W,5DO 5 20,O <O,W W O 300.000 40.G IWW W,O C ,000 13.South Same Na RN m er Trunk Easement.2.39 74,000 L. 70.000 70,000 TD,OW 14.MOmllmeous Proonds, 5AW.DW M.000 20D.000 200.000 200.000 200. 1000.000 LOW OW 2,000, 3.400.000 TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS N,TOB,WO aF1,W0 SSS,OW 1,Sm,WO 1023 WO T,115,OW BW0,000 310]S WO 1B 10,008 M.M8000 3,m0 W0 COST REIMWRSED 1.MA ITpigANNED FAGUTIESPRESENRY UNDER CONSTRUCTION PORTION FUNDED W OTHER DISTRICTS 2.MASTER�PLANNEO FALIUFIES%iESENRY UNDER DESIGN ••• PORTION FUNDED BYOTXER gSTRICTS 3.MASTEfl�PLANNED FACIUTIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN ON CONSTRUCTION County Sanitation District No. 3 Schedule of District Collection System Projects CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A E C D E F 0 H I J K L TOTAL COST W"6IN MMET EST REG EST REG EST REG EST REG FIVE EST S YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT T02DM PRCGME9B 19B9-W 18a]49 I"BM lmN w 2M04001 YEAR TOTAL 2001-2000 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE 1.Me;Ie 9rament SUNdnk Road 13) 4OD.000 50.OM 3M,OM SOAC eM,MO eM,M0 2.Sister Ave FMlGNoftY Ser;r,11-1]-1(1)In..5%) 1M,MD 119,OM IQWD 10,M0 10,OM 3,Sister Ave P.S.Enforcement.11-17.1 or(12.4%) 1,195,M0 1,1M,M0 95.OM 95.000 ".000 A.Miramar Repel lnleraga Parallel(3) STOi 5.700,000 S,Np,CW S.VVe abe ReOef Tronk(3) 700.0)0 700,000 7041,001) S.Omn9a-Wealem Sue9unk Rettflewn,12 G) I.M).MO 57.000 100.001) 1=000 50,000 1.150.oM ijilo'llbo ].Nnotl INT Retlel,OrenpeNorye%Meta 131 3.=,coo lOD,000 1,SM,M0 1.501 ],1M.oso 200.000 3,MD, B.HOOYer-NtlaMm 5u5Wnk flellMen TraeY I3I 1.050. E0.000 SHOO SOO,OOo I,D5D.000 I.M. 00 9.MIIIr-HOIDer.Mean le 1-fillseerouB5,3.3&1(3) 5.305,000 5.000 W.= 1W,000 3,OOgOW 2,O01 1d1,CW 5,300,000 E=.coc 10,MIIIr-HCMr lm,now- Imperial HA,_336-3(3) 2,932, U. 1,500,OOD 1.am. 0 2,NO." 2,900.01 11.Los Names;Su umak RMM(3) 4,900,000 n.wo.MO 4.acx% o 12.McBnolla Rallel Sewer.WeNmNslr%Treak,135E(3) 1550,000 1,OOD,OW w.030 500M 1.550.000 1,550,000 13.Tactile Pipe Made,3-36•' 2.500.05c1 1,9M. S)i IM,aM EOD.MD SM, 10.WNMnYer Are.Faro Mein ReMrmeM,138E 4.6315.000 4XILMIC 'AM,000 300,000 M.001 15, 4SFreewyVtltlebq,3-37 43.000 B. 5.O0 III= 10000 10.000 35.000 n.00, 16.SM &NMols$Oe fPo ,R02b'15)8%) 500.000 5M,OM SM, 17.Min Pump Suisse Reha0.2JT...I M) ]0],OM ), Si ,MD 5M.000 50,000 ]M,0o0 TO, 18.MlMelbneous pmlerls 5,2M.OM 2M.OM 2M,Mo 2MM0 2M.IKD 9M.DM 1.OM,M0 1.BM. 3pM,DOD TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 41,951.000 i681,OM 3.7t00M 2,980,000 5,610.00D e2800110 1.00000 17,990,000 13.000.000 MM0,00011 2500,M0 PMIMLLY PUNDEO9Y d9T111CT 11 1,I MRP NEDFACILITIESPRESENTLYUHOERWMTRULl10N •• dAM pEX01N0 2.MASTER-PLMNEO FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER DESIGN "' PMTIALYFWOEDEYOTHERMIRRICTS 1 MASTER-PANNED FACILITIES SCNEDULEO FOR FUTURE CESIDN OR CONSTRUCTION County Sanitation District No. 5 Schedule of DIs1Nct Collectlon System Projects CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A B C 0 E F 0 H I J M L IE Y]M8 BUDGET EST RED EST RED EST RED EST RED FARE EST6 YEARS TEN COSTTO PROJECT IN PROGRESS 199591 NNI.BB 1998.19 19BB3c00 me-2001 YEM TOTAL IDB1d0011 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE 1.hfts,PUMP Season RAN.2-37 ry]5%) 12.000 W.W] 100,00] 900,0W 152.500 1,A2,SW 1.303 2.Pump Salon Re9abilily PLe & 5001000 bW. ].W.CmIHmy GnNty Tmnk RMab,53130)'(20%) 5]9,OW 50,0W 50,OW W, <.DoC von Twnk RMaMIiMOon(3) 2,W0,000 2,W0. 5.somoe PfnnMwle RWNm SW.WO 5001 B.MIseelle ue PmN. ]S.OW 75000 IS,OW ]5,W0 ]S.DW 375(NO ]]5.W0 ]W 1,3]5A00 TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 651AW "fi.D0 ITF000 B]6 W0 M.M. 18,000 1,831,8W ]]]bAW 6,W3 00 1.2]bAW PARTMLLV FUNDED BY DISTRICT No.a 1.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER CO115TRUCTION1 •' PAATMLLY FUNDED BY OTHER NSTRICTS 2_NASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER DESIGN 3,MASTERAAMNEO FACILITIES SCHEMED FOR FUTURE DESIGN&CONSTRUCTION County Sanitation District No. 6 Schedule of Olshict Collection System Projects CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A B C D E F G H I J N L TOTALCOST OGol99 BUDGET EST REG EST REG EST REG EST REG FIVE EST S YEARS TEN COSTTO PROJECT T020" IN PROGRESS 1996-97 199748 1998.99 19114ND 2WD EA 200 2001 YOUR TOTAL 11008 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE Re hub,Coast Hwy Geo,Tmnk Ra5,5-3]J(1)•(90%) 2,352.d]0 2,157,0O0 M.000 200.O00 200.= 2.Watson Ave l Cel3esnb S.Sewer.6-13(3) 3,M2.000 32,W0 25.000 950.000 25.001) 1,000,000 2.2d1.000 3.200,CO3 3.Fa1Mew Refld. Rakes St b Whon SI..6-12(2) 3,426000 375,W0 6O.00) 2.M.= I,WO,OW 3,13W,O0t 3,050,000 <.OISNq 6Trvnk ParelMl(3) I,EW.W3 16'.p.000 1.503,000 S.Domr Dom Tmnk Pmllel(3) 1.SW.ND 1$OO,WO 1.500.000 6.C015eeAm PS Rehab 5 FM RepI,]-23.1(Old 6=5%) 20,090 50,OW 2,SD] )2.500 ].Pump Station ReM0,2-37'(5%) 261.030 1,OW IS,= 30,000 165,dp W.000 260,00) 260.O03 6.MAccV. oue Pmlerss 1300.000 W.000 50.000 50.000 SO= W.W0 200.000 2W.M 4W,000 550,OW TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 13,ST6,000 2,686.Wo 360 COD ],000,000 1,262600 80.000 50.000 4,202,61M LSWtN.1 10,260,000 650,000 PM1NLlY NrmEDBY d9iRCT5 1.Me5TERR NEOFACILITIESMBEN YONOERCpBINGCLION •• PARTALLYNImE09Yd5TRICTST514 2.MASTERAIANNEO FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER OESgN ••• PARTIALLY FUNDED UY OTHER DISTRICTS 3.N0.STERFUNNEO FACILITIES SCHEdREO FOR FIINRE 0E51GN OR CONSTRUCTION County Sanitation District No. 7 Schedule of DIBDIct Collection System Pr0)eCIS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A B C D E F G H I J K L TOTAL COST w3 BUDGET EST REO EST REO EST REO EST REO FIVE EST 5 YEARS TEN COSTTO PROJECT TOW20 IN PROGRESS IM-97 111l 1MSM 1BBBd000 20W3O01 YEAR TOTAL WOt-200S YEM TOTAL COMPLETE I.PUMP Station ASandonmenl.1-143 ISS W.000 100.030 ISOLOW IN,= 2.pangs Pool Aves Trunk Regaamenl.7-1]O) B20 35, W,OW 1115,OW NO,IMD MAW M.000 3.Tpslln Ab Base Fatllaiea W. IO.WO 10.W0 W,DW 10.OW W,000 CO.OW <.MLsc.Pump Station RenaCllmlian.237"'—(251N IM2, 12,OW W.= 150.DW 1.W0.000 2W,OW 1.CW,OW I,CW.OW S.NmM Trunk Rep%..nl(3) 2,850. Ea" 1MO,W0 1,000, 2,050,OW 2W,W] 2.SW, S.Relocate Glaltt-Red Hill Siphon,7-1-2 ❑. 27, W,OW W,000 W. ). GNIar-Rea Hill IMermpa l3) 5.900. 3W.OW 3W,OW S.OW.OW SWSDW S.Red Hill IMemeNor Paul(3) IAW. 1.100.000 1.IW= S.Lempl Heights SeNer RegxameM. ]-22-1R(3) 5,399, l,aa9. W,DOY I,W0.0W Lsoo 00 SW. 3,5W,W0 3,5W,000 10.Impovtion.to Noun St.P.S..]-]-1(2)'(20%) 1,151. 1]l, 3W000 0.10,W0 W,O00 S30,W0 ISDOW 900,W0 11.Bmmm9 Took Repb0n¢nl(3) BW, SWAM O50.W0 12.Ldhge Ave PR PmeVelFpm MEm,]-2}1 1,395, W.OW 3BO.OW BW.oW CS,OW 1.3)fi.OW 1,3]SAOO 13.MIsxOarl Pro" 2.]W, 1W,000 IMIM 1W.OW 1WOW 1W. SWLOU SW,000 1,OW 1.>W.WO TOTAL LAPITALIMPROVEMENTS tJ,3]0.W0 2,1N,W B]OpW 1.)A0.0W 3,HO,OW 0.1WpW I.—red11 ,OW B,1WAW 19,50,000 • PoWp16 TO SE SHARED BY MST.M 1.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION •• RWrI TOBFS WWOST.B&MT.P 2.MASTERVLWNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER DESIGN ••• PORTIONS TO IS SHARED IN MST.1 3.NU STER PIANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION "'• CONSTRUCTION FUNWIGFROMCAL-TRAH56CITIES ••••• PARTIALLYFUNCEDW MERDISTRICTS County Sanitation District No. 11 Schedule of District Collection System Projecb CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A S C U E F G H I J K L TOTAL COST 613518 S110GET EST REG EST REG EST REG EST REG FIVE ESTSYFARS TEN COSTTO PROJECT T02020 IN PROGRESS 1999-9T 199T-98 19MM ION-20b 2000.2001 YEAR TOTAL 2C01.2b8 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE 1,HMMgKe Beach PuMhmo AingmmeM(3) 350,00 20,00p 30GOW 39000 250.000 250,020 2.SWIer Ave FWGmIcy Sewer,11-1]-1(1)•(]d5%) 339,OW 309. 30.000 W.OW 30,O00 3.Slater Ave P.S.Replacement,11-17-1(1)'(8].9%) 63N." 5749.O0] 650.000 twom 650.O00 e.Slater Ave.RoM(3) 3600,000 2W,OW 200,0W 2.600,000 2.91)).000 S.GPMenwes151.Sewer Replmsmenl.1117-2(2) 3650.000 5GW0 500.000 2.000,000 1W,00O 2,SM W0 3650,000 6.H fl Nleruplor(3) 3.000. 3,WOOW 3.000,OW T.SMIe1Spr,d.%Replefemenl(3) fiW.OW W0000 ..DD) 8 Wmner Am Sewer Relld(3) 70D.000 ]WAW ]WACO fi.Mlb.Pump Slelbn lmpmvemenls.3J]^(13%) b5, j ID,WD 0.000 3W,OW AO.OW AW.OW eW.OW IO.PS.Repkmat6MMm.13) W0, 900.W3 5W,0W 11.Suce N Nicents St.Trunk ReNIb (3)•(eft%) ]]5,0W 3)5,W0 375.0W 12,Mbnllenepua Promos 3,025.0W ]5.000 ]50W ]S,GW ]5.000 79 3]50W 3]5W0 750,OW 1,2)5W0 TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 30203,UW AASAb 916,W0 2,b6AW 016000 1600 89 W0 6,3b,W0 12 e06000 1,3]S Ob PARMLLY FUNOEDW OnT oCTNe 3 1.uuSTER-P. INEO FACILRIES PRESEWLY 0NOER CONSIRuCTION •• PARIMLLY FUNCEp9Y piHER dSTNICTS 2 WSTERA NED FACIumU PRESEWY UNDER DESIGN County Sanitation District No. 14 Schedule of District collection System Projects CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A B C O E F C H I J N L TOTAL COST B 6 BUDGET EST RED EST RED ESTRED EST RED FIVE EST 5YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 IN PROGRESS ISWO7 1997-90 1998.99 1999-2000 200 .2001 YEAR TOTAL Ml.2006 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE 1.Impro9emenlslu Mein SI.P.S.. 29A(2) "p254) 2=000 95.01K 1.100.000 125.000 2.125,M 2.125,000 2.Mbe.Pump Station RNuOltilePon,2J7""'(25%) 7.500 100 200 2,00o 200 7,500 2.500 3.Mlwllaneous Pmjecis 1.090.000 25.000 25.000 25,000 25.0011 115,000 125.000 240,000 8511.000 TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 0?12 93A00 MS 100 1121 0 161000 36200 25000 i,347600 125.m 2A72.600 850.M PARPALLYFUNDEDBYDISTRICT867 1.MASTER-PLANNED FACRITIES PRESENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION PAATNLLY FUNDED BY DISTRICT] 2.MASTERA NETT FACIDHES PRESENT.Y UNDER DESIGN 3.MASTER NEDFACILmESSOIEDULEOFOLFURIREOESIGNCRCONSTRMPM Consolidated District Total Schedule of CIsNc1 CollecOon system PMfeCb CAMTAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A B C O E F 0 N I J N L TOTALCOST SI30196 BUDGET EST REp EST REp EST RED ESTREO FNE E9Tb YPAfl6 TEN COST-- TOIDM IN Pgpp0.E99 1PB6M 1Mde 1999-H 1M&)WB ZEN- 01 YFAR TOTAL 2001= YEARTOTAL COMPLETE TOTAL CONSOLIDATED DISTRICT 1fi1,6A],500 19,41;W0L ),6W,1W 11,560,W0 16,599.500 16,901,700 120500W 60322,11410 BS<05 W0 129,665,000 12,)W WO IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES Transfer of All Service Responsibilities(Government Code Section 7 00) All CSDOC service responsibilities will transfer to the new District, effective July 1, 1997. To prepare for this consolidation date, CSDOC will develop a single District budget and plan of operation as appropriate. Since CSDOC presently operates in a consolidated fashion under the terms of the existing joint operation agreement, no obstacles are anticipated. Transfer r of Assets. Liabilities. Contracts and Litigation (Government Code Section 575021 Assets, CSDOC assets will be transferred to the new District. Consolidation would result in all fixed assets of predecessor districts to be transferred at book value, less accumulated depreciation, to the new consolidated District. The current net valuation of these assets is $764,091,884 (as of June 30, 1995). In addition, all other assets jointly held in the form of cash, bank deposits, investments, notes and accounts receivable will be transferred to the new District. Liabilities: The new District will acquire all legal obligations and responsibility for all short-term and long-term liabilities of CSDOC. The District will assume payment of debt service on the outstanding Certificates of Participation (COPS) and outstanding G.O. bonds. The consolidated District will assume CSDOC's obligations to fund any previously allowed benefits to retired employees of CSDOC. Contracts: The District will assume all existing agreements, memoranda or other written understandings entered between CSDOC and other parties. Lifigation: The District will assume the position of the existing Districts in all existing legal suits pending against or initiated by CSDOC. All costs and expenses, including any judgment against CSDOC will be borne by the new District. Formation Of Special Zones And Improvement Districts (Government Code Section 57502) Prior to the effective date of consolidation (July 1, 1997), CSDOC shall define the boundaries of each special zone consistent with the intent to form a special zone for the territory encompassed by the service area of each predecessor district. In addition, CSDOC may define the boundaries for each former CSDOC COP zone to facilitate the formation of an Improvement District to service the outstanding COP debt upon consolidation into a single District. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Page 1 Ford Sauvajot Management Group,Inc. CSDOCOmpGuide.doe 9191% a Resolutions will be prepared by CSDOC, for the approval by the consolidated District Board of Directors, for the new District to establish special zones and improvement districts,and setting Sanitary Sewer Service Charges for each special zone. Transition Period It is anticipated that all transfers of responsibilities, obligations, and assets will encounter no obstacles, as the consolidation of the nine (9) districts into one County Sanitation District essentially formalizes the existing joint operating policies, methods, and practices. Accordingly, the transition period will consist of handling administrative and accounting changes, but will not involve organizational restructuring, interagency fund transfers, sale of assets, boundary changes, or any other matter that would materially affect LAFCO's ability to order consolidation without an election (Government Code Section 57801). County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Page 2 Ford Sauvajot Management Group,Inc. CSDOCUmpGutde.doc 9NN6 ITEM #14(g) SUMMARY OF BIDS Original Bid (May 21, 1996) Engineer's Estimate: $1,700,000 Pascal & Ludwig $1,644,000 Advanco 1,882,036 Margate 2,015,600 Sverdrup Civil 2,193,000 Pascal & Ludwig requested Bidder's Relief. Board granted and authorized rebid of project. Second Bid (August 21, 1996) Engineers Estimate: $1,900,000 Pascal & Ludwig $1,878,437 Margate 1,900,000 Advanco 1,956.231 Margate files protest letter on August 21, 1996. Are the changes to the original project material in nature? DMS:gc J:\W PDOC%STEWART%REPORTS%092596.R1 REBID OF P1-40-2 AND P2-47-2 ORIGINAL ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $1,700,000 ITEMS ADDED/CHANGED: a. Revisions to Hazardous Storage Lockers 50,000 b. Building 34,000 c. Ventilation to Metering and Diversion Structure 30,000 d. Polymer Dilution Tank Mixers 40,000 e. Hazardous Storage Locker Size Increase 10,000 f. Miscellaneous Hand Rail, Fencing, and Bridge 30,000 g. Cen Gen Instrument Air 8.000 Subtotal (Add) $ 202,000 ITEMS DELETED/CHANGED: a. Liners from beneath Hazardous <10,000> Storage b. Clarification of Redwood Specifications < 1,000> c. Revision of RFP Duct Reinforcement < 5,000> d. Clarification of Coating Thickness for < 1,000> Structural Aluminum e. Deletion of Abandoned Gas Compressor < 6.000> Demolition Subtotal (Delete) $< 23,000> TOTAL VALUE OF CHANGES $ 225,000' NET VALUE OF CHANGES $ 179,000 CONTINGENCY (ROUND OFF) $ 21,000 ENGINEER'S REBID ESTIMATE $1,900,000 13.2% of Original Engineer's Estimate DMS:gc J:%W P D OCZTE WARTVRE POR TS\D92596.R2 J ORDINANCE NO. 132 PROVIDING ADDITIONAL SERVICE CREDIT TO ELIGIBLE DISTRICTS' EMPLOYEES WHO RETIRE EARLY AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA PROVIDING FOR AN EARLY RETIREMENT INCENTIVE PROGRAM BY GRANTING ADDITIONAL SERVICE CREDIT TO ELIGIBLE DISTRICTS' EMPLOYEES AS AUTHORIZED BY THE COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT LAW OF 1937, GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 31641.04. WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts No. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 adopted Resolution No. 95-19 and Resolution No. 95-53 approving an Early Retirement Incentive Program for all eligible Districts' employees, as authorized by California Government Code Section 31641.04; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement by and among County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, District No. 1 is the appointed authorized agent to act for every other District; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of County sanitation District No. 1, acting as agent for County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, adopted Ordinance No. 126 on June 28, 1995, incorporating all of the same provisions as in Joint Resolution Nos. 95-19 and 95-53; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 have determined that the manner of performing service, and the total cost savings of having higher compensated employees retire and lower compensated employees hired to replace the retirees exceeds the total actuarial cost of the additional service granted to those who retire under this program. NOW THEREFORE, the Board o Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, does hereby ORDAIN: Section I: All regular employees of the County Sanitation-Districts of Orange County, California, who are eligible to participate as members and retire under the Orange County Employees Retirement System are granted two (2) additional years of service credit for retirement benefit purposes, provided they retire from regular employment of the Districts during the period of January 1, 1997 through and including March 31, 1997. Section ll: The General Manager of the Districts is authorized to execute any and all contracts or other documents and to transfer all required funds in order to implement the authorized actions provided for herein. Section III: The total cost savings of positions filled at a lower level or held vacant for a period of time shall exceed the total actuarial cost of the additional service credit granted and related paid leave pay-off costs. Section IV: Districts shall pay the actuarially determined cost of this early retirement incentive program over a period not to exceed five (5) years and on such other terms and conditions as shall be set forth in a mutually agreed upon written contract between the Districts and the Board of Retirement of the Orange County Employees Retirement System. Section V: This Ordinance shall become effective January 1, 1997. Section VI: The Secretary of the Board shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause a summary to be published in a newspaper of general circulation as the District is required by law. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 at a regular meeting held September 25, 1996. Chair of the Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 1 Of Orange County, California ATTEST: Secretary of the Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 25, 1996 TIME: 7-30 PA. DISTRICTS: 1, 2. 3. S. 6 7 11, 13 AND 14 DISTRICT T JOINT BOARDS IMORENOI . . .... . . . . . MC OUIOAN ........ IKERRYI ......... . . . BOWMAN . . ..... . . — — IPERRY/SCHAFERI . . . . . �ERRVMAN ....... IFORSYTHEI ......... . BROWN ...�........ ICOONTZI . . ..... . . . . MUAPMY .......... ISCOTTI ............ . COLLINS . ......... — — IMTTSI . .. .. . . . . . SALTARELU ........ (DEBAYI ............ . COX . — IBTEINERI . . . . . . . . . . . ICO%I ..... .. ..... . . . GEBAYNES . . ......... (SELL) AUE . ..... . ... . . . . . GENES F ......... _ _ DISTRICT 2 IBAUERI . ......... . . . DUNLAPF .. ....... IDOWNEVI . . .... ..... ECKENRODE ........ �G IPAMERI ........... . OUNIAP ... . ...... —_ —_ _— IGULLUISONI ......... WELCH ........... y (DOWNEVI............ ECKENRODE . . . .... _ ISCOTR ............ COLLINS .......... y/_ IMRRY/SCMAFERI ...... FEMLYMAN . . . . .... — (BELL) .............. DENIES . . .......... JL IANDERSONI .......... FLOM .. .. . . . .... _ IPARKEAI ........... DUNLAP. .......... IMARSHALLI .......... GRIFFIN .. .. . . . .... IANDERSONI ......... FLOM ............ IWELCHI . . ..... ...... GULLIXSON . . . . .... — IMORENOI ... . ..... MCUUMAN ........ MARDI . ............ HAMMOND ... ..... .. ICOONTZI ........... MURPHY .. ........ y/ IMUERI . ............ fEIPZIO . . .. . . ..... _ —_ JIMAKHEADI ... NOW.. . . . . . ..... �� IMNERI ............. LINN ....... ...... — RTEINER.. .. . ....... SINGER . . . . . . ..... V IMORENOI . ........... MC OUIOAN.. ...... DALY) . ........... ZEMEL ... ......... 1 ICOONTZI . .. ...... .. . MARSHY . ... ...... NOPS OALYI . . ........... 2EMEL ............ _&L SWANS) . . . . ... . . ... RICE . . . .... ..... _ . SWANS) . . . . .. .. . . . .. RICE . . .. .... .... . DISTRICT] IPOTTSI . . . . . . . . . . . .. SAWN ..L......... _ — IDOTSONI ... ........ SAWN .. . . . ...... �L (ZLAKEI . . . ... . . . ... SAWN ........... — aLAKETI............ SINGER ..... . .....'y RLAKETI. . . . . . . . . . . .. SINGER N ......... _ . IKEMYI BOWNAN . . . . . ..... �L STEINERI . . . . . . . . . . ... STANTON ......... — IFORSYTHEI . ........ NOWN ISTANTONI . .......... STENER .......... — — .... ........ .......... � IMILLER) . . . .......... SWAN ............ ISCUTTI .... ........ DUNLAP — — IPARKERI . . . .. . . . .. . . . ......... W OAI ........ SYLVIA ........... — IAHDERSONI . .. . .. . . . FLOM . . .......... IOULLIXSON) .......... MLCH .... . ...... IMARSHALLI . .. . . . . . . GRIRN IDALYI .............. ZEMEL . ... . . ..... . IBAUERI . . . ... . . . . . . LEIRIG ........... aG — IMINERI . . .... . ..... LNN . ............ ✓ —_ IMORENOI . . ... . . . . . . MCUUIGAN ........ L STAFF OTHERS IMNKHEADI . .. . .. .. . NOW............ ANDERSON . WOODRUFF .. IEVANSI . . . ... . . .... RICE ............. GRAY ..... � ANDRUS . . .. � ISTEINERI . .. . .. .. FAN19N ........ L HODOES ... .EMIR � — . . . .. IWAHLSTROMI . ...... SYLVIA ........... _� JONK ..... KIN . .. IDALYI . . .. . .. . . .... ZEMEL ............ y_/ KYLE ..... LEE ... ..... CINDER .... LNOSlAOM .. DISTRICTS LUDWN ... _ NIXON...... (COX) . . . ........... DEMY.......... MCINTYRE.. �� SHAW. ..... (STANTON) .......... $WINER........... DOWN .. .. STONE ..... _ IDEMYI COX T PETERMAN . .......... DISTRICT S TUCHMAN . . ........ HEAT IPEflRYISCMAfEflI ..... FERRYFMN......... WILSON Y .. ...... _ (COX) . . . . ........ DEMY............ WILSON ✓ ISTANTONI .......... STEINER........... • DISTRICT 7 �' .�M..""......y�/—� ........ M'ARDI ............ HAMMOND. ........ //FFF "L (PDX) . ... .. ....... MITARELLI ........ —_ ICO%I ISCHAF. ...... . DEMY. .. ......... (COON . . . . .... . FERRYMAN. . ....... V /y/H / vy��L (MORENO) ... . ..... . . M03UIGAN ...... ,', /.`.'F.bw/.. INONTZ) .. . . .... . . . MARSHY . . ...... ISTANTONI . . ... . . . . . STENER. . . . . .. .. ., y DISTRICT 11 X IBAUERI . . . .... . . . . . EI ........D ✓ IBAUERI . . . . . . . . . . . . ETTLTTLOFF ......... .STRICT 13 (WELCH) .. . ...... . . ..iYYl1KW✓-........ ✓ IDALYI . . . ....... 2EMEL . . . .......:: IPARKEMI . . . . .... . . . DUNLAP. . ......... _ ICOONTZI .. . . ..... .. MEINER . ISTANTONI ... ..... .. STENER. . . ........ ..L DISTRICT 14 / IMTTSI . ........... SALTARELU ........ L _ ICOONWARDI I ........... MAMMON .......... — . ........... MAMMON........ ISTANTONI .......... $WINER... . . . .. ... IMILLERI . ........... SWAN ... . .. . ..... JAWMOCIBSIDIRECTOMIDL02. 09/1N96 y COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES JOINT BOARD MEETING SEPTEMBER 25, 1996 JBICTS pFO9q G H c�a a C7 p 4 �'pTFCTiN�E ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 s ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,2,3, 5,6,7,11, 13,and 14 of o Orange County,California,was held on September 25,1996,at 7:30 p.m.,in the Districts'Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1,2, 3,5,6,7, 11, 13,and 14 as follows: ACTIVE ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO.1: x Pat McGuigan,Chair Ted R. Moreno x James M.Ferryman,Chair pro tam _ Arthur Perry x Mark A-Murphy _ Joanne Coontz x Thomas R.Saftarelli _ Jim Potts Roger Stanton _X_ William G.Steiner DISTRICT NO.2: x Norman 7 Eckenrode,Chair _ Carol Downey _JL_ Daniel T.Welch,Chair pro tam _ John M.Gullason x John Collins George Scott —]L_ Barry Denes _ Bob Bell • Burnie Dunlap Glenn Parker _z_ James H.Flora _ Steve Anderson _I Pat McGuigan Ted R.Moreno x Mark A Murphy Joanne Coontz _IL_ Chris Norby Don Bankhead x Sheldon Singer George L.Daket Roger Stanton x William G.Steiner x Bob Zemel _ Tom Daly DISTRICT NO.3: _IL Sal A Sapien,Chair _ Harry M.Dotson , x Sheldon Singer,Chair pro tam George L.Baker x Walter Bowman _ Gail Kerry _IL George Brown _ Marilyn Bruce Hastings John Collins _ George Scott •_ Bumie Dunlap _ Glenn Parker • James H.Flora Steve Anderson • Don R. Griffin Patsy Marshall • Victor Leipzig Ralph Bauer • Wally Linn Eva G.Miner • Pat McGuigan Ted R.Moreno .IL Chins Norby Don Bankhead • Margie L. Rice James V.Evans Roger Stanton x_ William G.Steiner Charles Sylvia _ Roben Wahlstrom x Bob Zemel _ Tom Day DISTRICT NO.S: x Jan Debay,Chair John C.Cox,Jr. x Wiliam G. Steiner,Chair pro tam _ Roger Stanton x John C.Cox,Jr. _ Jan Debar, DISTRICT NO.6: _x James M.Ferryman,Chair Arthur Perry x Jan Debay,Chair pro tam _ John C.Cm Jr. .x William G.Steiner _ Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO.7: __X_ Barry Hammond,Chair _ Mike Ward x Thomas R.Saltarah,Chair pro tam _ Jim Potts _IL Jan Debay _ John C.Cox,Jr. x James M.Ferrymen _ Arthur Perry __" Pat McGuigan _ Ted R.Moreno x Mark A.Murphy _ Joanne Coontz x William G.Steiner _ Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 11: __" Victor Leipzig,Chair _ Ralph Bauer x _ Shiley Dettloff,Chair pro tam _ Ralph Bauer Roger Stanton x William G.Steiner DISTRICT NO. 13: _ John M.Gullurson,Chair _IL Daniel T.Welch —_ Bob Zemel,Chair pro tam Tom Day Jt_ Burnie Dunlap Glenn Parker • Mark A. Murphy Joanne Coontz William G.Steiner Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO.14: X Thomas R.Saharelli,Chair _ Jim Potts x Mark Murphy,Chair pro tam Joanne Coontz _.A_ Barry Hammond Mike Ward x Wiliam G.Steiner Roger Stanton �L Peer A.Swan Darryl Miller _2_ County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes ` 9125/96 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Don F. McIntyre, General Manager, Blake P. Anderson, Assistant General Manager-Operations, Judith A. Wilson, Assistant General Manager- Administration, Penny Kyle, Board Secretary, Jim Benzie, Kelly Christiansen, Janet Gray, Ed Hodges, Patricia Jonk, Steve Kozak, John Linder, Mike McCarthy, Mike Moore, Bob Oaten, Mike Peterman, Wendy Sevenandt, Gary Streed, Michelle Tuchman, Nancy Wheatley, Mike White OTHERS PRESENT: Terry Andrus, Assistant General Counsel, Bill Knopf, Phil Stone ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Joint Chair Joint Chair John Collins noted that initial meetings of the Rate Advisory Committee (RAC) and the Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) had been conducted. These working committees, comprised of members of the public and private sectors, had been formed to assist with the Strategic Planning effort. He invited Director George Brown to speak to the Directors about his observations of these first meetings. Director George Brown advised that the next meeting of the RAC was Thursday, October 24, at 9:00-12 noon; the PAC would next meet on Thursday, November 14, at 9:00 a.m.-11:00 a.m. Both meetings will be conducted in the Board Room. All Directors were encouraged to attend. John Collins noted the strong attendance by Directors at the recent Strategic Planning Workshop. He reminded District No. 2 Directors that a special meeting to hear the Porter Plating appeal would be conducted Thursday, October 10, 1996, at 5:30 p.m. The following tentatively scheduled upcoming meetings were then announced as follows: Operations, Maintenance, and Technical Services Committee - Wednesday, October 2, at 5:30 p.m. Planning, Design, and Construction Committee -Thursday, October 3, at 5:30 p.m. Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee - Wednesday, October 9, at 5:30 p.m. -3- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 9/25/96 Steering Committee - Wednesday, October 23, at 5:30 p.m. Directors were reminded that the CSDOC Second Annual Family Day would be held at Plant No. 2 on Saturday, October 12, between 10:00 a.m.-2:30 p.m. Joint Chair Collins announced that for the second consecutive year, the Sanitation Districts had been awarded the Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting by the Government Finance Officers Association. He noted that Mike White, Controller, had primary responsibility for preparing the award-winning financial document. John Collins introduced David Wilma, Special Agent for the United States Environmental Protection Agency. Mr. Wilma worked with Source Control Division in monitoring the sewer downstream from Venus Labs. Mr. Wilma spoke of the efforts by the Source Control Division, which resulted in a search warrant inspection. The U.S. District Attorney and the courts are now handling the case. The following employees who worked on this matter received Certificates of Appreciation from Mr. Wilma: Kelly Christensen, James Davidson, Dave Engstrom, Darrell Ennis, Tom Gaworski, Mike Masterson, Merrill Seiler, Deon Carrico, and Mike Reideler. Joint Chair Collins presented a resolution to Director John Cox, Jr., expressing appreciation for his efforts during his recent tenure as Joint Chair. ALL DISTRICTS Report of General Manager Don McIntyre congratulated Nancy Wheatley, Director of Technical Services, for her efforts regarding policies of combined sewer systems, which has resulted in her receipt of the Hammer Award at the annual WEFTEC conference in Dallas. DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held August 28, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -4- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 9/25/96 DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meetings held July 24, and August 28, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. ALL DISTRICTS Ratification of payment of Joint and Individual District Claims MOTION: Ratify payment of Joint and Individual District claims set forth on exhibits "A" , 'B", and "C', attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below. ALL DISTRICTS O8/07/96 08/21/96 MISC. Joint Operating Fund - $1.040,405.06 $523,972.97 $ 2,618.50 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 2,301,318.40 704,668.80 0.00 Joint Working Capital Fund - 237,881.45 242,106.62 1,030.10 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 133,819.56 19,998.59 29,905.95 DISTRICT NO. 1 - (936.30) 0.00 692.78 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 499.31 2,102.92 2,167.40 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 110,034.68 20,153.82 1,993.35 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 3,407.61 273.28 265.83 DISTRICT NO. 6 - (446.33) 0.00 278.74 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 36.504.72 150,804.14 624.11 DISTRICT NO. 11 - (547.43) 160,948.44 516.69 DISTRICT NO. 13 - 2.55 0.00 73.43 DISTRICT NO. 14 - 47.13 0.00 186.28 DISTRICT NOS. 3 & 11 JOINT - 1,875.00 0.00 0.00 DISTRICT NOS. 5 &6 JOINT - 4,177.42 8,859.30 0.00 DISTRICT NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 2,202.90 0.00 0.00 DISTRICT NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 7,294.62 14.76 0.00 $3.877.540.35 1.833.903.E $40.353.17 DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES A verbal report was represented by John Collins re the September 25, 1996 meeting. MOTION: Receive and file draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on August 28, 1996. -5- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 9/25/96 DRAFT PLANNING. DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES Director Sheldon S. Singer, Chair of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee, gave a brief verbal report on the items being recommended for approval. MOTION: Receive and file draft Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on September 5, 1996, as corrected (per Item 14(e)). JOB NO. P2-58 WITH GIERLICH-MITCHELL, INC. FOR GRIT AUGER IMPROVEMENT AT PLANT NO. 2 (All Districts): The Engineering Department requests authority to issue a purchase order for rehabilitation of grit auger at Plant No. 2, for a total amount not to exceed $63,680.00. (PDC96-47) MOTION: Authorize issuance of a purchase order for Job No. P2-58, Grit Auger Improvement at Plant No. 2, to Gierlich-Mitchell, Inc. for design, manufacturing and installation services, for a total amount not to exceed $63,680.00. CHANGE ORDER NO. 4 TO JOB NO. P1-36-2 WITH MARGATE CONSTRUCTION FOR SECONDARY TREATMENT IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 1 (All Districts): The Construction Manager and Director of Engineering request approval of Change Order No. 4 providing for seven items of additional work and four credit items. (PDC96-42) MOTION: Approve Change Order No. 4 to Job No. P1-36-2 with Margate Construction for an addition of$24,733.00, increasing the total contract amount to $34,918,007.00. PHASE II AND III OF THE STRATEGIC PLAN (All Districts): The Engineering Department requests approval of professional services agreements for Phase II and Phase III of the Strategic Plan for engineering services and preparation of a Programmatic Environmental Impact Report. (PDC96-45) MOTION: Authorize staff to solicit proposals and negotiate a Professional Services Agreement for engineering services for Phase ll, Treatment, Reuse and Disposal Facilities. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 9/25/96 ADDENDUM NO. 3 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH LEE & RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. FOR MODIFICATIONS TO ELECTRICAL AND CONTROL SYSTEMS AND PROCESS EVALUATIONS AT PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-40-1 AND MODIFICATIONS TO ELECTRICAL AND CONTROL SYSTEMS, AND PROCESS EVALUATIONS AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-47-1 (All Districts): The Engineering Department requests the approval of an addendum to the agreement providing for additional engineering services and design changes. (PDC96-37) MOTION: Approve execution of Addendum No. 3 to Professional Services Agreement with Lee & Ro Consulting Engineers, Inc., in the amount of$76,801.00, for a total amount not to exceed $1,247,967.00. JOB NO. P1-40-2 (REBID). FACILITY MODIFICATIONS AND SAFETY UPGRADES AT PLANT NO. 1. AND JOB NO. P2-47-2 (REBID). FACILITY MODIFICATIONS AND SAFETY UPGRADES AT PLANT NO. 2 (All Districts): The Director of Engineering requests that a construction contract be awarded re miscellaneous tasks for operational and safety related improvements to the treatment plants. The PDC Committee and Executive Committee reviewed the proposed actions by the Joint Boards at their meeting of September 25, 1996 in response to a protest letter from Margate Construction, Inc. protesting the bid of Pascal & Ludwig Engineers. (PDC96-49) Doug Stewart, Engineering Manager, presented a brief history of the project, and discussed the recommended actions. General Counsel's Office responded to questions by Directors regarding legal issues. MOTION: 1) Approve Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications correcting the date for receipt of bids; 2) Receive and file letter dated August 21, 1996 from Margate Construction, Inc. protesting the bid of Pascal and Ludwig Engineers; 3) Receive and file memoranda from General Counsel dated September 10, 1996 and September 17, 1996; 4) Accept protest of Margate Construction, Inc., declaring Pascal and Ludwig Engineers are ineligible to bid pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 5105; 5) Award contract to Margate Construction, Inc., second lowest bidder, for Job Nos. P1-40-2 (Rebid) and P2-47-2 (Rebid), in a total amount of$1,900,000.00. -7- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 9/25/96 CHANGE ORDER NOS. 2 AND 3 TO CONTRACT NO. 3-36R. REPLACEMENT OF WESTMINSTER AVENUE FORCE MAIN (FIRST UNIT) AND NEW WESTSIDE PUMP STATION FORCE MAIN, WITH ALBERT W. DAVIES, INC.. AND NOTICE OF COMPLETION (District 3): The Construction Manager and Director of Engineering request approval of Change Order No. 2, providing six items of additional work and granting a time extension of 25 calendar days for completion of said additional work; approval of Change Order No. 3, providing for an adjustment of Engineer's estimated quantities; and approve execution of the Final Closeout Agreement and filing of a Notice of Completion. (PDC96-44) MOTION: 1) Approve Change Order No. 2 to Contract No. 3-36R with Albert W. Davies, Inc. for an addition of$31,301.55 and 25 calendar days; 2) Approve Change Order No. 3, authorizing a net deduction of$42,216.00, decreasing the total contract amount to $3,823,756.55; and 3) Approve execution of Final Closeout Agreement and authorize filing of a Notice of Completion. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION, AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES: Director George Brown, Chair of the Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee, gave a brief verbal report on the items being recommended for approval. MOTION: Receive and file draft minutes of the Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee meeting held on September 11, 1996. TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF JULY 1996 (FAHR96-49) MOTION: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of July 1996. ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE DISTRICTS' INVESTMENT POLICY (All Districts): The Director of Finance requests revision of the Districts' Investment Policy Statement. (FAHR96-51) MOTION: 1) Receive and file Staff Report dated September 11, 1996; 2) Receive and file Investment Policy approved by Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee on September 11, 1996; and 3) Adopt Resolution No. 96-79, adopting Districts' investment policy, adopting investment performance reports and schedule of frequency of investment performance reports, repealing Resolution Nos. 95-14, 95-15, and 95-78, and rescinding minute order of the Boards of Directors of May 24, 1995. -8- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 9/25/96 ORDINANCE NO. 132, AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. PROVIDING FOR AN EARLY RETIREMENT INCENTIVE PROGRAM BY GRANTING ADDITIONAL SERVICE CREDIT TO ELIGIBLE DISTRICTS' EMPLOYEES AS AUTHORIZED BY THE COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT LAW OF 1937, GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 31641.04 (All Districts): The Director of Human Resources, in conjunction with the FAHR Committee, requests that an Ordinance be adopted providing for two additional years of service credit to eligible Districts' employees who retire between January 1 and March 31, 1997, in accordance with provisions of Government Code Section 31641.04. (FAHR96-52) MOTION: 1) Read proposed Ordinance No. 132 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance; and 2) Introduce Ordinance No. 132 and pass to second reading and adoption at the October 23, 1996 Board Meeting. PROPOSITION 218, RIGHT TO VOTE ON TAXES ACT (All Districts): The Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) requests the Boards to declare their opposition to Proposition 218. (FAHR96-54) MOTION Approve FAHR Committee's recommendation taking no official position on Proposition 218, and direct staff to continue gathering and distributing information regarding potential impacts of the measure. DRAFT EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MINUTES Verbal report by John Collins, Chair of Executive Committee, re September 18, 1996 meeting. MOTION: Receive and file draft Executive Committee Minutes for the meeting held on September 18, 1996. LAFCO APPLICATION FOR THE CONSOLIDATION OF THE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY (All Districts): Staff requests approval by each District of the LAFCO application for the consideration of the nine County Sanitation Districts. Judy Wilson, Assistant General Manager-Administration, provided the Directors with a verbal report and slide presentation on the topic. MOTION: Table the matter until January 1997. -9- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 9/25/96 GENERAL COUNSEL'S COMMENTS PRIOR TO CLOSED SESSION (All Districts): General Counsel reported to the Directors the need for a closed session as authorized by Government Code Sections 54956.9 and 54957.6 to discuss and consider the items that are specified as Items 17(b)(1) through 17(b)(4) on the published agenda. CONVENE IN CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 54956.9(a) AND 54957.6 (All Districts): The Boards convened in closed session at 9:22 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9(a) and 54957.6. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Boards of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. No actions were taken re Agenda Item Nos. 17(b)(1) through 17(b)(4). RECONVENE IN REGULAR SESSION (All Districts): At 9:27 p.m., the Boards reconvened in regular session. ORDER ANNEXATION NO. 9 - CRYSTAL COVE STATE PARK(District No. 5): The Director of Engineering requests approval of ordering annexation of a 20-acre portion of Crystal Cove State Park known as the "Historic District', located on Pacific Coast Highway north of the intersection of Sand Canyon Avenue. MOTION: Adopt Resolution No. 96-80-5 ordering Annexation No. 9 - Crystal Cove State Park to County Sanitation District No. 5. ORDER ANNEXATION NO. 151 - GOODMAN ANNEXATION (District No. 71: The Director of Engineering requests approval of ordering annexation of 1.01 acres of unincorporated county territory south of the intersection of Lower Lake Drive and Lake Court. MOTION: Adopt Resolution No. 96-81-7 ordering Annexation No. 151 - Goodman Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7. -10- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 9/25/96 APPROVE A NEW NEGOTIATED CONSENT DECREE RE U.S. GOVERNMENT V. MONTROSE CHEMICAL CORPORATION, ET AL. (District No. 13): Consideration of motion approving a new negotiated Consent Decree re U.S. Government v. Montrose Chemical Corp., at al., at no cost to the Districts. MOTION: Approve a new negotiated Consent Decreee re U.S. Government v. Montrose Chemical Corp., at al., at no cost to the Districts. ADJOURNMENTS (All Districts): The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 9:27 p.m. Secretary of Boards of irectors of County Sa it Diqocts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14 _11_ FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 0820196 PAGE1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID OS21I96 POSTING DATE 0821A18 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 153767 ACWA $150.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING 153768 API I ROMA INC $7,540.00 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 153769 ARMA INTERNATIONAL $585.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 153770 AT&T.CELLULAR CR&R $14.08 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 153771 A T&T-CELLULAR CR&R 54.71 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 153772 AWWANVOT CONFERENCE 580.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING 153773 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS 538,857.66 O&M AGREEMENT OKY GEN.SYST.M.0.8-9-09 153774 AKCENT $50.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 153775 AMERIDATA $28.721.98 OFFICE EOUIPMENT 153776 AMERICAN PAYROLL ASSOC. $590.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 153777 AMER.SOCIETY FOR MICROBIOLOGY $519.00 PUBLICATION 153778 BLAKE P.ANDERSON $91.83 REIMBURSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE 153779 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $041.62 NOTICES&ADS 153780 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT $1,071.13 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 153781 ATKIN/JONES COMPUTER SERVICE $321.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT X 133782 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $3.695.15 PAYROLL SERVICES 2153783 AWARDS&TROPHIES $25.17 PLAQUES W 153784 BFI MEDICAL WASTE SYSTEMS $47.40 WASTE DISPOSAL .153785 E S BABCOCK&SONS INC $270.00 LAB ANALYSIS -4 153786 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $373.35 BATTERIES D 153787 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $422.00 TRUCK WASH TICKETS I 153780 BIO-GRO DIVISION 569,99163 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 4-26-95 153789 BOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE 545.00 TRUCK REPAIRS 153790 BONA-RUES $156.55 TRUCK PARTS 153191 BOOT BARN $312.15 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 153792 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $53.309.97 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7.18 153793 BOZNANSKI&CO.,INC. 54,500.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 153794 BUSH&ASSOCIATES,INC. 58,311.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.&8-94 153795 MICROBAC LABORATORIES,INC. $360.00 CONTRACT SERVICE 153796 CS COMPANY $64.39 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 153797 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE 5859A3 SERVICE AGREEMENT 153798 CALIF CENTRIFUGAL PUMP $1.650.00 PUMP PARTS 153799 CALIFORNIA LABORATORIES&DEV $4,372.25 MAINTENANCE 153800 CALIF RELOCATION SERVICES $209.00 RELOCATION 153801 CAMALI CORP. $1,300.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 153502 CANUS CORPORATION $5,200.00 FIBER OPTIC CABLE 153803 CAROLLO ENGINEERS $107.323.19 ENGINEERING SER. M.O.5�12-93,3-27-95,&24-95,8-23-95 153804 CASA $9,000.00 MEMBERSHIP FEES 153505 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $2,219.08 OFFICE FURNITURE 153806 CERFNET $20.00 COMPUTER SERVICES 153807 CETAC TECHNOLOGIES,INC. $284.65 LAB SUPPLIES 153808 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $150.39 SERVICE AGREEMENT 153809 COAST TRANSMISSION $200.35 AUTO SUPPLY 153810 COUCH&SONS $141,182.00 CONSTRUCTION 11-17-1 153811 COMPUSERVE $107.42 COMPUTER SERVICES 153812 CONNELL GM PARTS/DIV. $217.77 TRUCK PARTS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0a/2D/96 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 08/2IM POSTING DATE 080196 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 153813 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $1,408.78 ELECTRIC PARTS 153814 CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS $480.03 FREIGHT 153815 CONSUMER PIPE $36.47 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 153816 COOPER CAMERON CORP. 51,584.32 ENGINE PARTS 153817 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $134.27 TRUCK PARTS 153818 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $211.45 ELECTRIC PARTS 153819 CRANE PRO SERVICES $3.248.72 CRANE REPAIR 153820 CAL STATE UNIV FULLERTON $250.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 153821 DCC/CAL INC $1.196.03 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 153M J.W.D'ANGELO CO.,INC. $146.36 BUILDING MATERIALS 153823 DAY TIMERS INC. $32.85 SUBSCRIPTIONS 153824 DE GUELLE 9 SONS GLASS CO $510.55 SAFETY GLASS 153825 DELL MARKETING L.P. $3.232.50 COMPUTER 153826 DEL MAR ANALYTICAL $380.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 153827 DELTA PACKAGING PRODUCTS,INC. $154.30 LAB SUPPLIES TTi 153828 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $1,011.22 PAINT SUPPLIES X 153829 ESP NORTH $1,062.27 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES �—153830 EDWARDS DIV.OF GS BLDG SYS. $2.721.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT Lb 153531 ELECTRA-BOND,INC. $1,397.39 ROLLER BRACKET REPAIR `-'153832 EMERGENCY MGMT NETWORK $2,405.00 CPWFIRST AID TRAINING 153833 ENCHANTER,INC. $3.500.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5.24-95 � 153834 FLUID TECH.SALES 5645.39 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES fJ 153835 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. 5346.25 AIR FREIGHT 153836 THE FEED BARN $527.97 BREAK AREA FURNITURE 153837 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $1.181.31 FILTERS 153838 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $1,135.27 LAB SUPPLIES 153839 FLO-SYSTEMS $202.69 PUMP PARTS 153840 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $43.63 PHOTO SUPPLIES 153841 FRAZEE PAINT&WALLCOVERING $97.75 PAINT SUPPLIES 153842 FRYS ELECTRONICS $2.735.82 ELECTRONIC&COMPUTER SUPPLIES 153843 GST,INC. $1,199.38 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1538" GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $1,77D.33 CHEMICALS 153845 GE IND B POWER SYSTEMS $3.790.14 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 153946 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $5,61KIAS TELEPHONE SERVICES 153847 THOMAS GRAY&ASSOC INC $624.00 LAB SERVICES 153848 DGA CONSULTANTS $1,366.00 ENGINEERING SER.M.O.641-94 153849 GRIFFIN CARRICK $9.128.06 LEGAL SERVICES-TECHITE M.O.9.27-95 153850 HLC BASSOC. $7,900.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 163851 HB TYPE B GRAPHICS $592.95 PRINTING 153852 PETER HASS $740.25 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 153853 HATCH&KIRK,INC. $39.18 TRUCK PARTS 153854 MIKE HERRERA $250.00 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 153855 HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT $2,083.33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN. 153856 HOLMES 8 NARVER,INC. $11,253.97 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-04 163857 HOME DEPOT $164.01 SMALL HARDWARE 153858 JILL HOWARD $636.20 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE OW20M PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 08121196 POSTING DATE 0521196 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 153859 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $81.77 PAINT SUPPLIES 153860 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $15.77 WATER USE 153851 HUNTINGTON AMCIJEEPIRENAULT $32.33 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS 153862 HUNTS FINAL PHASE $500.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 153863 HYCLONE LABORATORIES - 5674.53 LAB SUPPLIES 153864 IPCO SAFETY $14,706.55 SAFETY SUPPLIES 153865 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $571.97 CONNECTORS 153866 INDUSTRIAL WASTE $39.00 SUBSCRIPTION 153W7 INGERSOLL-RAND EQUIP CORP $12,068.00 COMPRESSOR 153868 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. $408.23 TRUCK PARTS 153869 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT 541.59 WATER USE 153870 JAMISON ENGINEERING 52,083.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 153871 JAY'S CATERING $1,359.06 DIRECTORS MEETING EXPENSE 153872 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $70.23 ELECTRIC PARTS 153873 KASBARA ENGINEERING $962.68 ENGINEERING SERVICE X 153374 KEMIRON PACIFIC,INC. $47,711.74 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.9-27-95 = 153875 KERRY CONSULTING GROUP $4.102.95 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES M.O.IIAS-95 153876 KING BEARING,INC. $142.69 MACHINE SUPPLIES 153871 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $1.719.72 TOOLS --1 153878 LA MOTTE CHEMICAL PRODUCTS $90.58 CHEMICALS n 153879 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY CO. $1D5.01 SAFETY SUPPLIES I 153880 IAMSON CORPORATION $214.62 FILTER W 153881 LEE 8 RO CONSULTING ENGR. 532,402.67 ENGINEERING SERVICES M.O.5-24-95,5-12-93,12-8-93 153882 CHARLES G.LEE 5295.93 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 153583 LEWELLYN TECHNOLOGY,INC. $1,000.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 1538M LIMITORQUE CORP. $1.594.76 ELECTRIC PARTS 153885 K.P.LINDSTROM,INC. $10.286.32 ENVIR.CONSULTING SERVICES NO 12-9-90 153880 LOVE AT FIRST SITE&CO. $241.76 CATERING 153887 LYLE SCREENPRINTING $38.79 PICNIC EXPENSE 153888 MPS $266.33 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 153889 MAG SYSTEMS $345.82 INSTRUMENT PARTS 153890 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS,INC. 5482.81 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 153891 MAMCO INTERNATIONAL $506.86 JANITORAL SUPPLIES 153892 MARDEN SUSCO INC. $732.16 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 153893 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $46,694.03 CONSTRUCTION P2.42-2 153894 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $142.19 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 153895 MATT-CHLOR,INC. $944.46 FERRIC CHLORIDE SUPPLIES 153896 MCGARRY CENTRAL BUSINESS PROD $1,426.00 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 153891 DONALD F.MCINTYRE $107.90 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 153895 MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. $421.05 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 153599 MES COMPANY $988.07 REBUILD ROLLER BELT 153900 MINNESOTA WESTERN VISUAL PRES. $65.66 LAB SUPPLIES 153901 MISSION ABRASIVE SUPPLIES $478.41 WELDING SUPPLIES 153902 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3,367.95 UNIFORM RENTALS 153903 PETE MORRISON $855.23 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 1539M MORTON SALT $536.95 BOILER CONDITIONING FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE OB120196 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID OB121M POSTING DATE 08I2198 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 153905 NEWPORT EXTERMINATION 52,700.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1539M HICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY SO.&22.83 LUBRICANTSIDIESEL FUEL 153907 NORCO DELIVERY SERVICE $98.20 MAIL DELIVERY SERVICE 153908 DAG FLIGHTDISK $1.044.54 SOFTWARE 153909 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $276.54 SAFETY GLASSES 153910 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $2.472.69 OFFICE SUPPLIES 153911 OMNI WESTERN INC. $12.61 HANDTOOLS 153912 ROBERTJ.00TON $775.23 MANAGEMENT TRAINING 153913 OPERATION TECHNOLOGY,INC. $1,605.47 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 153914 THE ORANGE COUNTY FORUM 880.00 MEMBERSHIP 153915 ORANGE COUNTY SEPTIC BERM. $3,172.00 PIPE REPAIR 153916 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $651.61 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 153917 ORTIZ FIRE PROTECTION $4.300.52 FIRE SPRINKLER REPAIR 153918 OXYGEN SERVICE $2,972.42 SPECIALTY GASES 153919 COUNTY OF ORANGE $55.000.00 DEPOSIT,AGREEMENT D95.107 M 153920 - COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $17.915.26 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP X 153921 OCEMA $13,650.00 ENGINEERING SERVICE M.O.5-22-96 163922 PSI $567.07 STEAM CLEANING SERVICES 153923 PSSI $2.698.20 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION .4 153924 PACIFIC INVESTMENT MGMT CO. $123.493.00 INVESTMENT MGMT.SERVICE RESOL.95-75 D 153925 PACIFIC PARTS $607.60 INSTRUMENT PARTS 1 1539M PACIFIC BELL W.05 TELEPHONE SERVICES 1- 153927 PACIFIC ENERGY ASSOC..INC. $300.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 153928 PADRE JANITORIAL SUPPLY $554.54 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 153929 PAPER SHOWCASE $24.95 TRAINING SUPPLIES 153930 PARTS UNLIMITED $11241 TRUCK PARTS 153931 PEDERSON COMMUNICATIONS $875.00 CABLE REPLACEMENT 153932 PERFORMANCE ANALYTICAL $545,00 LAB SERVICE 153933 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $1,008.01 REIMB.PETTY CASH 153934 PIMA GRID SYSTEMS,INC. $113.667.30 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3-29-95 153935 POLYPURE.INC. $49,417.36 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92 153936 PONTON INDUSTRIES,INC. $18,140.56 METERS 153937 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $208.00 ICE FOR SAMPLES 153938 PROMINENT FLUID CONTROL,INC. 82,39T00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 153939 PRYOR RESOURCES,INC. $345.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 153940 PYRAMID FENCE COMPANY $723.00 FENCING INSTALLATION 153941 QUICKSTART TECHNOLOGIES $3,675.00 SOFTWARE 153942 R&R INSTRUMENTS $64.19 ELECTRIC PARTS 153943 REAL TIME SYSTEMS CDR $2.216,00 METER REPAIR 153944 RED WING SHOES $282.73 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 153945 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DIST $279.63 ELECTRIC MOTOR 153946 THE REGISTER $1.975.20 NOTICES&ADS 153947 ROSEMOUNT ANALYTICAL,INC. $1,337.98 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 153948 S&J CHEVROLET $182.86 TRUCK REPAIRS 153949 SAWPA $35,000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 153950 SAREIS-PDC $200.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE OI20196 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0M27196 POSTING DATE 0821196 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 153951 SANTA ANA RIVER FLOOD $1,100.00 MEMBERSHIP 153952 SAWA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $110.48 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 153953 SARATOGA INSTITUTE,INC. $963.20 PUBLICATION 153954 SEA COAST DESIGNS $1.176.83 LAB SUPPLIES 153955 CITY OF SEAL BEACH $202.90 WATER USE 153956 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $732.70 TOOLS 153957 SHURELUCK SALES 12,250.53 TOOLSMARDWARE 153958 MIKE SILBERMANN EQUIP RENTAL $22,900.00 SEWER REPAIR 153959 SMITH-EMERY CO. $2,155.50 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-13-94 15396D SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP. $970.78 TOOLS 153961 SO CO AIR DUAL MAN DIST $4,940 00 CARD EMISSION FEES 153962 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY $32,580 68 ANNUAL EMMISSIONS FEES M.O.8.26.96 163963 SOUTH COAST WATER 5125.00 LAB SUPPLIES 153964 SO CALIF EDISON CO $5B4O40.37 POWER 153965 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $481.45 NATURAL GAS M 153966 SPEX CERTIPREP INC. $326.37 LAB SUPPLIES =153967 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION $350.00 UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE FEE 153968 SUMMIT STEEL $402.56 METAL T!! 153969 SUNSET FORD $174.97 TRUCK PARTS —1153970 SUPER POWER PRODUCTS $538.75 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 183971 SVERDRUP CIVIL INC. $350.578.20 CONSTRUCTION P2-35.3,PI-38-5,P246,P2-55 D1 153972 T&C INDUSTRIAL CONTROLS $1.830.70 ELECTRONIC PARTS Un 153973 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $1.405.34 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 153974 TAYLOR INDUSTRIAL SOFTWARE $4.850,00 SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE 153975 THINK EARTH ENVIR ED.FOUND. $7,000.00 MEMBERSHIP 153976 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $1,386.16 MECHANICAL PARTS 153977 TONER SYSTEM INTERNATIONAL $2.803,49 PRINTER SUPPLIES 153978 TRANSCAT $694.93 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 153979 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $794A4 TRUCK PARTS 153980 JG TUCKER&SON, INC. $127.02 INSTRUMENT PARTS 153981 UNISPEC ENGINEERING 56,70963 CONTROL SUPPLIES 153982 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $585.93 PARCEL SERVICES 153983 VWR SCIENTIFIC $7,454.29 LAB SUPPLIES 153964 VALVATE ASSOCIATES $385.21 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 153985 VISION ENWRO SERVICES,INC. $9,989.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICE J-11-1-A 153986 WAL-CON CONSTRUCTION CO. $7.119.30 CONSTRUCTION 5.373 153987 WARREN GORHAM&LAMONT INC. $196.75 SUBSCRIPTION 153988 THE WASTEWATER CONNECTION $14.093.70 HERBICIDE 153989 WESTERN AIR $8,712.30 ENGINEERING SERVICE 153990 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $29.144.20 CAUSTIC SODA MO 8.23-95 153991 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL INC. $10.693.13 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE M.O.4.24-95 153992 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL $1,214.27 MURIATIC ACID RES.896.32 153993 XEROX CORP. $1.002.06 COPIER LEASES TOTAL CLAIMS PAID OB121198 E7,831,903.81 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 0820M PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0821196 POSTING DATE 062IMS SUMMARY AMOUNT 02 OPER FUND $1.140.34 #2 CAP FAC FUND $962.58 #3 OPER FUND E70,785.76 #3 CAP FAC FUND $9,358.08 95 OPER FUND $273.28 #7 OPER FUND $42,494.17 97 CAP FAC FUND $108.309.97 Al I OPER FUND 57,986.20 #11 CAP FAC FUND $152,982.24 0586 CAP FAC FUND $8.859.30 #7914 OPER FUND $14.76 JT OPER FUND $523.972.97 CORF $704.668.80 m SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $19.998.59 X JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $242.106.62 x ly 91,833,903.64 a m FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 08M0 96 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 08/07/96 POSTING DATE 08/07/98 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 163438 AM BEST COMPANY 511131 PUBLICATION 153439 A T&T-PRO WATTS $2.911.68 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 153440 A T&T-MEGACOM SERVICE $939.44 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 163"1 A T&T-CELLULAR CR&R $12.60 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 153442 A T&T-CELLULAR CR&R $1.26 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 153443 ABRASIVE ENO.TOOLING&EQUIP. $459.68 HARDWARE 153444 ACCU STANDARD $133.09 LAB SUPPLIES 153445 ADAMSON INDUSTRIES $62.41 LAB SUPPLIES 153446 AGSON INC. $109.50 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 153447 AIR LIQUIDE AMERICA CORP. $642.19 SPECIALTY GASSES 153448 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS 536,644.00 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.O.8.9419 153449 ALHAMBRA FOUNDRY CO LTD $6,368.03 MANHOLE FRAMES&COVERS 15345D AMERIDATA $6,12BA4 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 153451 AMERICAN AIRLINES $2,850.26 TRAVEL SERVICES 153452 AMERICAN SIGMA $3.247.14 LAB SUPPLIES M ISM53 SLAKE P.ANDERSON $876.78 EXPENSE REIMB. X 153454 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL $365.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT .ZC 153455 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $2,947.70 NOTICES&ADS W 153456 AQUATIC BIOASSAY&CONSULTING $470.00 LAB SERVICES 153457 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE,INC. $2,198.00 TOXIC WASTE REMOVAL 153458 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. $60.OD WASTE OIL REMOVAL Ce 153459 ASSOCIATED CONCRETE PRODUCTS $1.512.81 BUILDING MATERIALS �. 153460 AMSA $500.00 PUBLICATIONS 153461 ATKIWJONES COMPUTER SERVICE $321.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT 153462 RANDOLPH AUSTIN CO. $690.62 LAB SUPPLIES 153463 AWARDS&TROPHIES $111.19 PLAQUES 153464 BFI MEDICAL WASTE SYSTEMS $5.50 WASTE DISPOSAL 153465 E S BABCOCK&SONS INC $1.350.00 LAB ANALYSIS 153466 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $1.199.29 BATTERIES 153467 BAUER COMPRESSOR $128.81 COMPRESSOR PARTS 153468 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $393.30 TRUCK WASH TICKETS 153469 B104RO DIVISION - $117,798A7 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 426-95 153470 BLACK&VEATCH $702.02 ENGINEERING SERVICES P146&P2-55 153471 BONA-RUES 5388.88 TRUCK PARTS 1534T2 BRANDALL MODULAR CORP $56,16TOO INFO.TECH.TRAILER MO 4-24-96 153473 BROOKS INSTRUMENT DIV. $236.98 INSTRUMENT 153474 BUDGET JANITORIAL $3,33000 JANITORIAL SERVICES MO 1.12-94 153475 BUSH&ASSOCIATES,INC. $840.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6$94 153476 BUSINESS ENTERPRISE $1,450.00 REGISTRATION 153477 CH2M HILL $75.532.09 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-31 153478 MICROBAC LABORATORIES $720.00 GAS ANALYSIS SERVICES 153479 C P&R CATALOG ORDER DEPT $55.00 PUBLICATION 153480 CS COMPANY $90.25 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 153481 - CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH 5628.72 LAB SUPPLIES 153492 CALTROL,INC. $1,01129 HARDWARE 153483 CALIF ASSOC.OF SAN.AGENCIES $640.00 WORK CONFERENCE REGISTRATION FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 08/05196 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 08/07196 POSTING DATE 08/07196 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 153484 CALIFORNIA JOURNAL INC $37.95 SUBSCRIPTION 153485 CALIF SOCIETY OF MUNICIPAL $60.00 REGISTRATION 153488 CAMP DRESSER&MC KEY INC $l12,297.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 153457 CANUS CORPORATION $58,354.12 FIBER OPTIC CABLE 153488 CAPITALWESTWARD $561.99 MECHANICAL PARTS 153409 CAROLLO ENGINEERS $34,686.04 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI38,P243.3 153490 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $7,667.26 OFFICE FURNITURE 153491 CENTURY SAFETY INST.&SUPPLY $222-16 SAFETY SUPPLIES 153492 CHAPMAN COUNSELING $3,600.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING 153493 CLEAN SOURCE $156.41 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 153494 COMMUNICATIONS PERFORMANCE GROUP $10,000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 153495 COMPUTERS AMERICA 52,116.23 PRINTER SUPPLIES 153496 CONNECTOR TECHNOLOGY,INC. $116.33 PERMIT CANCELLATION REFUND 153497 CONNELL GM PARTS/DIV. $42.75 TRUCK PARTS 153498 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $4.620.67 ELECTRIC PARTS X 153499 ' CONSUMER PIPE $449.24 PLUMBING SUPPLIES = 153500 CONTINENTAL EQUIPMENT&SUPPLY $3,222.06 TOOLS '--' 153501 CONTRACTORS EQUIPMENT CO $95.62 AUTO PARTS b 153502 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS OC $15,745.25 CONSULTING SERVICES M.0.8-11-93 —1153503 COUNTY CLERK 538.00 CEQA FILING FEE Dy 153504 CA DEPT OF HEALTH SERVICES $3.527.00 ELAP CERTIFICATION FEE 1 153505 JAMES DARLINGTON $150.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES N 153506 ALBERT W.DAVIES,INC. $3.219.34 REMOVE TECHITE PIPE 153507 TOM DAWES $428.00 EXPENSE REIMS. 153W8 DELL MARKETING L.P. $30.17 COMPUTER PARTS 153509 DEL MAR ANALYTICAL $190.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 153510 DIAMOND LINERS INC $387,67 TRUCK BED LINERS 153511 THE DICKSON COMPANY $161.Co LABSUPPUES 153512 DIETERICH-POST CO. $563.14 INSTRUMENT PARTS 153513 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $835.52 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 153514 MICHAEL F DILLON $6,024,50 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 153515 DOUBLETREE INN OF MONTEREY $298.0D ROOM RESERVATION FOR CASA CONK 153516 ROBERT F.DRIVER ASSOC. $125,000.00 EXCESS LIABILITY INSURANCE MO 5.13.92,640A2 153517 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $999.26 PAINT SUPPLIES 153518 THE ECONOMICS PRESS,INC. $45.50 SUBSCRIPTION 153519 EMA/ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES $19.91 PUBLICATION 153520 ENS RESOURCES $2,808.29 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 153521 ESP NORTH $774.77 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 153522 ELCAN TECHNOLOGIES CORP $166.20 TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT 153523 ELECTRA-BOND,INC. $619.56 PUMP REPAIR 153524 EMERGENCY MGMT NETWORK $2,560.00 CPRIFIRSTAIDTRAINING 153525 ENCHANTER,INC. $5,600.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5-24-95 153526 FST SAND AND GRAVEL,INC. $262.40 ROAD BASE MATERIALS 153527 - FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $671.20 AIR FREIGHT 153528 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $597.95 FILTERS 153529 FIRST CHOICE $759.72 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 08105196 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 08107/96 POSTING DATE 08107198 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 153530 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $7,86048 LAB SUPPLIES 153531 FISONS INSTRUMENTS $23.054.70 SERVICE AGREEMENT 153532 FLO-SYSTEMS $1,374.05 PUMP PARTS 153533 FORD SAWAJOT MGMT GROUP $2,304.48 CONSOLIDATION SERVICES 153534 FORKERT ENGINEERING B SURVEY $2.628.35 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES NO 64MM 153535 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $114.95 PHOTO SUPPLIES 153536 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $17,609.48 WATER USE 153537 THE FOXBORO CO. $1,720.38 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 153538 FRANKLIN QUEST CO. $5,822.15 TIME MANAGEMENT TRAINING 153539 FRY'S ELECTRONICS $3,148.99 ELECTRONIC&COMPUTER SUPPLIES 153540 CRY OF FULLERTON $292.26 WATER USE 153541 GST,INC. $1.541.72 OFFICE SUPPLIES 153542 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $541.23 LUMBERMARDWARE 153543 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $290.93 CHEMICALS 153544 GATES FIBERGLASS INSTALLERS $1,931.00 EMERGENCY TANK REPAIR M 163545 - GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $4.982.21 TELEPHONE SERVICES = 153546 GIERUCH-MITCHELL,INC. $2,267.57 PUMP PARTS 153547 WAN GRAINGER,INC. $1.409.96 COMPRESSOR PARTS � 1535/6 GRABBY S.T.I. $3,802.52 ENGINE PARTS -I 153549 GRAYBAR $1.228.05 COMPUTER SUPPLIES tz 163550 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $239.47 PRINTING SERVICES I 153551 DGA CONSULTANTS $16.692.50 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.64494 W 153552 HB TYPE 8 GRAPHICS $3.909.17 PRINTING 163553 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $333.91 TRUCK PARTS 153554 HARBOR TRUCK BODY $989.14 TRUCK PARTS 153555 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $352.88 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 153556 HATCH 8 KIRK,INC. $5,036.73 TRUCK PARTS 153557 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS $4,228.20 CONTAINER RENTALS 153558 RC HOFFMAN ANDIOR ISCO $161.12 LAB SUPPLIES 153559 HOME DEPOT $152.06 SMALL HARDWARE 153560 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $1,016.72 PAINT SUPPLIES 153561 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $11.168.05 WATER USE 153562 I D P $275.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 153563 IPCO SAFETY S4,919.72 SAFETY SUPPLIES 153564 INDUSTRIAL STEAM $375.63 PUMP 153565 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $1.076.00 CONNECTORS 153566 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. $26.90 TRUCK PARTS 153567 IBM CORPORATION#2899757 $348.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 153568 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $877.41 BATTERIES 153569 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $76.82 WATER USE 153570 J2 PRINTING SERVICES $645.50 PRINTING 153571 JAMISON ENGINEERING $12,898.26 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 153572 JANDEL SCIENTIFIC $173.55 SOFTWARE 153573 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $801.53 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 153574 JAY'S CATERING $86.40 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE 163575 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO. $309.40 GAUGE FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 08/05/96 PAGE4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID M07/96 POSTING DATE 08/07/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 153576 JONES&ATTWOOD/WASTE TECH $1.000.00 FREIGHT FOR FSM MACHINE FOR TESTING 153577 KMI INDUSTRIES $164.70 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 153578 FRANCES L KALUZNY $65D.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 153579 KEMIRON PACIFIC,INC. $60,078.84 FERRIC CHLORIDE M09.27-95 153580 KERRY CONSULTING GROUP $7,375.11 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES NO 11.1&95 1535BI KEWAUNEE SCIENTIFIC CORP. $113.24 WORKBENCH 153582 KING BEARING,INC. $1,749.77 MACHINE SUPPLIES 153583 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $5.061.15 TOOLS 153584 KOPYKAT $6&20 MEDICAL RECORDS 153565 LSI NORTH AMERICAN SERVICE $297.00 INSTRUMENT REPAIR 153586 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $1,860.62 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICE 153557 LAIDLAW ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES $13,034,03 HAZARDOUS MATERIAL DISPOSAL 153588 LAW/CRANDAL,INC. $4,955.00 SOIL TESTING 7-13-94 153589 ORANGE COUNTY DIVISION $500.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES 153590 LOCALAGENCY $950.00 ANNEXATION FEE ITI 153591 LYLE SCREENPRINTING $914.31 PICNIC SHIRTS x 153592 MPS $101.78 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES _x 157583 MACOMCO E928.20 SERVICE AGREEMENT to 153694 MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY CORP. $5N.87 WELDING SUPPLIES —1 153595 MANHOLE ADJUSTING $5,625.00 ADJUST MANHOLE FRAMES&COVERS Lb 153596 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION INC $1.392,293.00 CONSTRUCTION PI-30.2 1 153597 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION INC $245,949.84 CONSTRUCTION P141 t 153598 MARTIN&SHIRLEY BURNS $75.00 PERMIT REFUND 153599 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $175.10 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 153600 MC AFEE ASSOCIATES $10,255.25 SOFTWARE LICENSE 153601 MCBAIN INSTRUMENTS $660.00 LAB SUPPLIES 153602 DONALD F.MCINTYRE $1.006.97 EXPENSE REIMB. 153603 MC JUNKIN CORP $5,853.28 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 153604 MELLON TRUST $16,481.87 COP TRUST SERVICES 153605 MESA MUFFLER $257.79 TRUCK PARTS 153606 METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT $696.00 MEMBERSHIP 153607 METTLER TOLEDO,INC. $3,323.23 SCALE REPAIR 153608 MICROFLEX MEDICAL CORP $1.088.00 SAFETY SUPPLIES 153609 MIDWAY MFG.&MACHINING $9,083.23 MECHANICAL REPAIRS IS3610 MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES CO $300.06 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 153611 MISSION ABRASIVE SUPPLIES $130m SAFETY GLASS 153612 MISSION INDUSTRIES $2.974.87 UNIFORM RENTALS ISM13 ISIAH MITCHELL $145.41 EXPENSE REIMB. 153814 MONITOR LABS $77.68 INSTRUMENT 153615 MORELAND&ASSOCIATES $5,125.00 AUDITING SERVICES M0341-95 153616 MOTOROLA.INC. $13.201.53 INSTRUMENT PARTS 153617 NASCO $501.43 VALVE 153618 NAT WEST MARKETS $750.00 COP INTEREST DRAW FEES 153619 STANDARD REF.MATL.PROGRAM $1.912.00 LAB SUPPLIES ISM20 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES $8.742.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 153621 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $102.27 SAFETY FILM RENTALS a ., FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 08/05196 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 08/07196 POSTING DATE 08/07/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 153622 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $725.58 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 153623 NEW HERMES INC $10.368.75 ENGRAVER 153624 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH S45.64 WATER USE 153625 HICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY $4,877.65 LUBRICANTS/DIESEL FUEL 153626 NORTH HILLS COIN-OP LAUNDRY $142.70 PERMIT REFUND 153627 OC-ASTD $385.00 MEMBERSHIP 153628 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $8,273.73 OFFICE SUPPLIES 153629 OMNI WESTERN INC $63.03 TOOLS 153630 ORANGE COUNTY FARM SUPPLY $931.45 CHEMICALS 153631 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $334.63 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 153632 ORANGE VALVE 8 FITTING CO. $2,027.78 FITTINGS 153633 ORITEX CORP $1.536.35 MECHANICAL PARTS 153634 OXYGEN SERVICE $2252.31 SPECIALTY GASES 153635 COUNTY OF ORANGE $1.050.00 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE 153636 COUNTY OF ORANGE $751.15 OVERAPPORTIONMENT REFUND R1153637 -ORANGE COUNTY FORUM 525.00 MANAGEMENTLUNCHEON =153638 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT $37,789,40 GAP WATER USE M.O.6-9-93 1MS39 PBD CONSULTANTS INC $892.04 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES w 153640 PSI $75.43 HARDWARE 153641 PSOC(POOL SUPPLY OF OC) $452.45 OPERATING SUPPLIES tp112 PSSI $11,522.00 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION 153643 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $661.10 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 111 153644 PACIFIC BELL $1.304.76 TELEPHONE SERVICES 153645 PADRE JANITORIAL SUPPLY $2,968.52 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 153646 PARKER HANNIFIN CORP. $475.03 MECHANICAL PARTS 153647 PARKHOUSE TIRE,INC. $1,568.84 TIRES 153648 PARTS UNLIMITED $945.92 TRUCK PARTS 153649 PATRIOT VIDEO PRODUCTIONS $519.D0 VIDEO TAPING SERVICE 153650 PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION $28,587.16 LAB SUPPLIES 153651 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $531.51 REIMS.PETTY CASH 153652 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $102,335.40 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.349-95 153653 POLYPURE,INC. $14.624.75 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92 153654 POWER DESIGN $943.89 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS 153655 POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO. $397.38 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 153656 POWER SYSTEMS $570.40 MAINTENANCE 153657 PRENTICE HALL $37.97 PUBLICATION 153658 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $336.00 ICE FOR SAMPLES 153659 PULSAFEEDER $499.79 PUMP PARTS 153660 OUICKSTART TECHNOLOGIES $1,050.00 CONSULTING SERVICES 153661 SIN GROUP,INC. $9.000.00 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 153662 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $693.10 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS 153663 R 8 R INSTRUMENTS $671.14 ELECTRIC PARTS 153664 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $2,002.72 TRASH REMOVAL 153665 REBIS $6,000.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 153666 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DIST $70.27 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 153667 THE REGISTER 5844.68 NOTICES 6 ADS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 08/05/96 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID O8107196 POSTING DATE 00/071% WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 153668 ROSEN'S ELECTRIC $546.50 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 153669 SKCWEST $101.31 SAFETY SUPPLIES 153670 SPSS,INC $862.00 SOFTWARE 153671 BANDON ENGINEERING,INC. $750.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 153672 SARBS-CWEA-PDC,INC. $500.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 153673 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTL $325,422.33 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.64.94 153674 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $636.80 SPECIALTY GASES 153675 SEA COAST DESIGNS $12.93 LAB SUPPLIES 153676 SEA WATER VISIONS $803.40 COOLER 153677 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $4.115.03 TOOLS 153678 SHASTAELECTRIC $267,344.00 CONSTRUCTION J-31-2 153679 SHORE PERSONNEL SERVICES $10,000.00 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 153680 SHURELUCKSALES $8.295.65 TOOLS/HARDWARE 153681 SIEVERS INSTRUMENTS INC. $1,800.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT m 153682 SKILL PATH SEMINARS $99.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING X 153683 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $290.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS s 153684 SMITH-EMERY CO. $1,934.00 SOIL TESTING M.0.7-13-94 153685 SMITH PIPE&SUPPLY $736.65 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 153686 SO CALIF EDISON CO $50,936.74 POWER 153687 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $2,239.41 NATURAL GAS LA 153688 SOUTHERN CALIF GAS COMPANY $15,450.00 CONSTRUCTION PI-51 153689 SOUTHERN CALIF TRANE SERVICE $10,059.00 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 153690 SPARLING INSTRUMENT CO.,INC. $115.10 METER 153691 SPEX CERTIPREP INC. $68.78 LAB SUPPLIES 153692 STANDARD SUPP&EQUIP CO $305.80 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 163693 STATE CHEMICAL MANUFACTURING $1,290.32 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 153694 STERLING ART $238.78 ART SUPPLIES 153695 SUMMIT STEEL $110.34 METAL 153696 SUNSET FORD $125.37 TRUCK PARTS 153697 SUPELCO,INC. $539.69 LAB SUPPLIES 153698 SUPER CHEM CORP. $2,009.65 CHEMICALS- 153699 SYMCAS $1.476.00 CONSULTING SERVICES 153700 SYSCOM INC $2,036.54 HUMAN RESOURCES TRAINING 153701 MAHIN TALEBI $565.92 EXPENSE REIMS. 153702 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $377.91 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 153703 TEXAS ANALYTICAL CONTROLS $604.06 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS 153704 THEODORE ROBBINS FORD $248.96 VEHICAL RENTAL 153705 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $2422.94 MECHANICAL PARTS 153706 TIME WARNER COMMUNICATIONS $41.28 CABLE SERVICES 153707 TONYS LOCK&SAFE SERVICE $292.96 LOCKS&KEYS 153708 EDWARD M.TORRES $223.92 EXPENSE REIMS. 153709 TOSHIBA INTERNATIONAL $1,203.62 INSTRUMENT PARTS 153710 TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY,INC. $15.742.68 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.0.5-11-94 153711 TRUESDAIL LABS $6,188.00 LAB SERVICES 153712 JG TUCKER&SON,INC. $443.94 INSTRUMENT PARTS 153713 US POSTAL SERVICE $5,000.00 POSTAGE FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE OW05196 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 08107M POSTING DATE 08107M WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 153714 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $396.00 LAB SUPPLIES 153715 UNISOURCEWOR BUTLER PAPER f WAT OFFICE SUPPLIES 153716 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $639.10 PARCEL SERVICES 153717 VWR SCIENTIFIC $4.602.87 LAB SUPPLIES 153718 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $351.66 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 153719 VERNE'S PLUMBING $205.00 PLUMBING SERVICES 153720 VERTEX SYSTEMS $2,363.01 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT 153721 WACKENHUT CORP. 511,867.32 CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS 153722 WAL-CON CONSTRUCTION CO. $7,141.12 CONSTRUCTION 153723 CARL WARREN 8 CO. $4,081.53 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR 153724 WASTE MARKETS $12.226.03 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 3.27-96 153725 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $17,774.50 CAUSTIC SODA MO 8.23-95 153726 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $1,959.50 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE MO 4-24-95 153727 WESTERN WHOLSALE CO $85.91 TRUCK SUPPLIES f1l 153728 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $732.42 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES X 153729 WESCO DISTRIBUTION INC. $1,595.78 INSTRUMENT PARTS 2 153730 CHARLES F.WINSOR $515.00 EXPENSE REIMS. 153731 WITEG $765.03 LAB SUPPLIES 1537M ROURKE.WOODRUFF B SPRADLIN $47,705.33 LEGAL SERVICES MO 7-26-95 -4 153T33 WORDPERFECT $.55.94 SUBSCRIPTIONS Lp 153734 XEROX CORP. 523,326.91 COPIER LEASES 1 153735 2YMARK CORP. $1.513.50 LAB EQUIPMENT V TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 08107/96 $3.877,540.35 FUND NO 9199 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 08105/96 PAGE 8 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID O8/07/96 POSTING DATE OW7196 SUMMARY AMOUNT 01 OPER FUND $60.D0 01 CONST FUND ($996.30) 02 OPER FUND $4,970.20 02 CAP FAC FUND $892.04 02 CONST FUND ($5,362.93) 03 OPER FUND $32.626.13 03 CAP FAC FUND $64,582.59 03 CONST FUND $12,825.96 05 OPER FUND $4.857.72 05 CONST FUND ($1,450.11) 06 CAP FAC FUND $200.00 06 CONST FUND ($646.37) 07 OPER FUND $31,363.77 07 CAP FAC FUND $6.667.00 X 07 CONST FUND ($1,726.05) = 011 OPER FUND $35721 �-I 911 CAP FAC FUND $260.00 t" 011 CONST FUND ($1,160.64) --1 013 CONST FUND $2.55 CU 014 OPER FUND $32.13 I 014 CONST FUND $15,00 CD 03911 OPER FUND $1,875.00 0596 OPER FUND $3,186,08 0586 CAP FAC FUND $991.34 0687 OPER FUND $2.202.90 07814 OPER FUND $1,294.62 JT OPER FUND $1,040,405.06 CORF $2.301,318.40 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $133.819.56 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $237.881.45 $3,877,640.35 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE-VARIOUS PAGE1 V REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID-MISCELLANEOUS HANDWRITE WARRANTS WARRANTDATE WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 0822/96 153994 CALL AMERICA INC $90.10 CELLULAR PHONE REIMB. 08/22/98 153995 DOUGLAS STEWART $635.00 EXPENSE REIMB. 08/27/96 154014 TRI-STATE SEMINAR $270.00 REGISTRATION O827196 154015 WEFTEC'95 $940.00 REGISTRATION 0828196 154016 KNOTT'S BERRY FARM $1.503.50 DISCOUNTTICKETS O81=96 154236 TRFSTATE SEMINAR ON-THE-RIVER $210.00 REGISTRATION 09/05196 154237 THE BALBOA BAY CLUB $3.314.70 NEWPORT SPILL-ANDERSON 09/05196 154238 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE $6,798.61 MEDICARE ADJUSTMENT 09K15196 154239 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $19.691.26 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP 09/05/98 154240 R.CRAIG SCOTT&ASSOC. $7,00D.00 EXPERT WITNESS RETAINER FEE TOTAL CLAIMS PAID $40,353.17 m X SUMMARY AMOUNT 2 W R1 OPER FUND $892.78 $2 OPER FUND $2.167.40 - 93 OPER FUND $1.993.35 n 95 OPER FUND $265.83 I , 96 OPER FUND $278.74 07 OPER FUND $624.11 811 OPER FUND $616.69 013 OPER FUND $73.43 #14 OPER FUND $186.28 JT OPER FUND $2,618.50 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $29,905.96 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $1,030A0 $40,353.17 STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, I hereby certify that the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 held on was duly posted for public inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on 19, 19 9lP IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this /f�day of Penny Kyle, Se et ry of of the Boards of Direct of C ty Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14 of Orange County, California BSFamsIF21A AGENDA & SCHEDULE TOPIC: PRELIMINARY FINDINGS ON PROJECTS 1 AND 2 OF OUR STRATEGIC PLAN AN INFORMATIONAL WORKSHOP FOR THE JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 108" ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 SEPTEMBER 21, 1996 - 9:00 A.M. - 12 NOON CALL TO ORDER 9,00 a.m. - 9:05 a.m. Coffee 9:05 a.m. - 9:15 a.m. Welcome — John Collins , — Don McIntyre.. 9:15 a.m. - 10:15 a.m. Preliminary Results of Ocean Outfall Investigation — Dave Ludwin 10:15 a.m. - 10:30 a.m. Break 10:30 a.m. - 11:20 a.m. Proposed Alternatives for Managing Peak Flows — Larry Roesner, CDM 11:20 a.m. - 11:50 a.m. The Relationship Between Projects 1 & 2, and the Decision-Making Process — Blake Anderson 11:50 a.m. - 12:00 noon Wrap Up — Don McIntyre ADJOURN JAW PDOCICOMMSE0921AGEND COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA F September 16, 1996 phone: (714)962-2411 call eadres°: Dear Fellow Board Member: P.G.Box B127 Fountain Valle,CA 92728 B12J I believe we can all agree that a primary responsibility of the Boards of streetA ne: t GB44 Ellis Directors is to establish "policy" for our organization. Much of the policy for Ellie Avenue Fountain Valley.CA the Sanitation Districts will be found in our new Strategic Plan. 927G8-7G18 Board members must be involved extensively in the planning process if we are to assume proper"ownership" of the plan and oversee the Member implementation of its goals and objectives in the future. Agencies 0 Within the next several months, we will be asked to make many decisions close that will have a profound impact on the operation of the Sanitation Districts for ananaim at least the next decade. One decision alone could cost as much as $200 at. Perk million. Before we can make informed decisions we need to understand the cycraS6 operational process and alternatives to solving the challenges that stand in Fountain Valley Fullerton the way of the Sanitation Districts accomplishing its mission. Huntington Beach Irvine Le Habra Our third Strategic Planning Workshop from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. on La Pnlma Las Ale Saturday, September 21, is designed to provide us with more essential al Newport Basch Grange background information for making informed decisions. Specifically, staff will Placentia present the results of our ocean ouffall investigation and the various Sense Ana Beal Beach alternatives to better manage peak flows. Stanton Tustin Vale Park I want to personally urge you to attend this important meeting. For further Yorba Linda information or to RSVP, please call Michelle Tuchman, Director of County o1 Grange Communications, 962-2411, ext. 2050. Sanitary Districts Sincerely, Ccete Mess Gorden Grove Midway City Water Districts hn C fins Irvine Panch oint Chair JC:MT J:IWPDOCITUCHMAN\egsWRKSH A Public Wastewater and Environmental Management Agency Committed to Protecting ti,a Environment Since 1954 AGENDA & SCHEDULE TOPIC: PRELIMINARY FINDINGS ON PROJECTS 1 AND 2 OF OUR STRATEGIC PLAN AN INFORMATIONAL WORKSHOP FOR THE JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 SEPTEMBER 21, 1996 - 9:00 A.M. - 12 NOON CALL TO ORDER 9:00 a.m. - 9:05 a.m. Coffee 9:05 a.m. - 9:15 a.m. Welcome -- John Collins -- Don McIntyre 9:15 a.m. - 10:15 a.m. Preliminary Results of Ocean Ouffall Investigation 10:15 a.m. - 10:30 a.m. Break 10:30 a.m. - 11:20 a.m. Proposed Alternatives for Managing Peak Flows 11:20 a.m. - 11:50 a.m. The Relationship Between Projects 1 and 2 11:50 a.m. - 12:00 noon Wrap Up ADJOURN J'.WVPDOCNCOMMSECIS21AGEND COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA September 16, 1996 phone: (714)962-2411 marling address: Dear Fellow Board Member: P.O. 9m 612J Fountain Valle,CA 927288127 I believe we can all agree that a primary responsibility of the Boards of e Os Avenue aaee iC6M ell Directors is to establish "policy"for our organization. Much of the policy for Fauresin Valley,cA the Sanitation Districts will be found in our new Strategic Plan. 92708-7016 Board members must be involved extensively in the planning process if we are to assume proper"ownership" of the plan and oversee the Member implementation of its goals and objectives in the future. Agencies 0 Within the next several months, we will be asked to make many decisions Cities that will have a profound impact on the operation of the Sanitation Districts for Anaheim at least the next decade. One decision alone could cost as much as $200 are. Buena Park million. Before we can make informed decisions we need to understand the Cypreas operational process and alternatives to solving the challenges that stand in Fountein Valley Fullerton the way of the Sanitation Districts accomplishing its mission. Huntington Beach Irvine La Habre Our third Strategic Planning Workshop from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. on Lo Palma Las Alamitos Saturday, September 21, is designed to provide us with more essential Newport Beech background information for making informed decisions. Specifically, staff will orange 9 9 P Y. Returns present the results of our ocean outfall investigation and the various Santa Ana Baal Beach alternatives to better manage peak flows. Stanton Made Villa Park I want to personally urge you to attend this important meeting. For further raroa Lind. information or to RSVP, please call Michelle Tuchman, Director of County of Orange Communications, 962-2411, ext. 2050. sanitary Districts Sincerely, Caste Mesa Garden Grove Midway oty Water Districts hn C Ilins Irvine Ranch oint Chair JC:MT J'1VJPD0CMCHMAM9%MKSH A Public Wastewater and EnWronmencal Management Agency Committed to Protecting the Environment Since 1854 AGENDA & SCHEDULE TOPIC: PRELIMINARY FINDINGS ON PROJECTS 1 AND 2 OF OUR STRATEGIC PLAN AN INFORMATIONAL WORKSHOP FOR THE JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 SEPTEMBER 21, 1996 - 9:00 A.M. - 12 NOON CALL TO ORDER 9:00 a.m. - 9:05 a.m. Coffee 9:05 a.m. - 9:15 a.m. Welcome John Collins Don McIntyre 9:15 a.m. - 10:15 a.m. Preliminary Results of Ocean Outfall Investigation 10:15 a.m. - 10:30 a.m. Break 10:30 a.m. - 11:20 a.m. Proposed Alternatives for Managing Peak Flows 11:20 a.m. - 11:50 a.m. The Relationship Between Projects 1 and 2 11:50 a.m. - 12:00 noon Wrap Up ADJOURN J1W PD0000MMSEC1921AGEND i t' County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC) Strategic Plan Workshop No. 3 Saturday, September 21, 1996 The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County is beginning Phase I of our new Strategic Plan. Three projects comprise Phase 1:An investigation and repair of our ocean outfall;a study of our wastewater collection system and ways to better manage peak flows;and the determination of an equitable financial program of sewer connection fees and annual user charges. We anticipate it will take approximately 18 months to complete these three projects. The following will give you an overview of Phase I projects as background information for our Strategic Plan Workshop No.3. Investigation and Repair of Ocean Outfall This project includes the investigation and repair of the Districts'primary ocean outfall,a 120- inch,5-mile outfall pipe and diffuser,and repair of the Districts'1-mile emergency 78•inch outfall. The work will include recommendations,final plans,specifications and contract documents to rehabilitate and repair known items,and items needing attention which may be discovered during the investigation phase. Our outfall,which is 25 years old,is half way through its 50-year design life and a tune-up is the most cost-effective way to insure continued reliability. Also included in this work is the investigation of various means to increase the capacity of the outfall system. The work will explore extending the diffuser,building larger diffusion ports,a planned opening of the end gate,use of the emergency 78-inch outfall and cleaning of the primary outfall. Permits and regulatory approvals will be necessary to proceed with recommended work. Some of the issues on hand are: - Inspection of the 120-inch outfall,including 5 miles of ballast,and the cleaning of the 120-inch outfall - Opening plugged ports - Analyzing options to increase hydraulic capacity - Repairing the 78-inch outfall Management of Peak Hydraulic Discharge This project includes determining average daily and peak wastewater flows,and ways to better manage peak flow,in order to delay or negate the need for a second operating ocean outfall. The cities and agencies we serve will be contacted to gather information on land use, population,condition of city sewers and other necessary information. Population forecasts will include gathering data from many agencies and individuals. An inflow and infiltration study (1&1),as well as sewer monitoring,will be conducted to validate generation rates and to determine cost�effeclive ways to reduce storm-related peak events. An interim flow management plan,including an operators manual and training on influent and effluent q pumping,are also included. Finally,the many alternatives identified will be narrowed through a decision model process conducted with our Boards of Directors, staff, the cities we serve,rate payers and other special interest groups. Some of the highlights of this project include: Collect data on land use and sewer conditions from member agencies Conduct I&I study Determine sewer conveyance system deficiencies and recommend improvements Identify flow reduction techniques prepare an interim pumping plan and conduct training Conduct a decision model process Determination of Financial Charges and Fee Schedules This project will build on the project listed above by sharing and using the same land use data. The object is to create one-time connection and annual user charges that closely approximate the cost of service. Some of the issues that will be explored in this study include: - How to improve customer convenience - Determine fair charges for users based on the type of use proposed for the facilities - Working with various business-related organizations to develop equitable and fair charges - Conducting a decision model which would include members of the Orange County business community - Recommending revisions to our source control ordinance to increase fairness of the connection fees N Rate Advisory Committee List September 17, 1996 1) Bob Lockhart, President Revenue Enhancement Group 801 E. Katella Avenue, Suite 200 Anaheim, CA 92805 2) Rick Chapler, Dir. of Property Operations Hotel/Motel Association of California c/o Anaheim Hilton &Towers 777 Convention Way Anaheim, CA 92802 3) Sam Olivito Western Car Wash Association 10810 Paramount Street, Suite 202 Downey, CA 90241 4) Rosemary Fox, President American Association of Retired Persons Fullerton Sr. Multi Service Center 340 W. Commonwealth Avenue Fullerton, CA 92632 5) Todd Priest, Asst. Dir. of Public Affairs Apartment Association of Orange County 12822 Garden Grove Blvd., Suite D Garden Grove, CA 92643 6) Mike Noonan, Vice President Orange County Business Control 2 Park Place, Suite 100 Irvine, CA 92714 7) David Placek, Senior Project Manager Building Industry Association Go Post, Buckley, Schuh, Jernigan 2501 Alton Avenue Irvine, CA 92714 8) Elden Davidson, Utilities Services Engineer City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, CA 92663 s 9) Patti Nunn, Economic Dev. Manager Development Services City of Santa Ana 30 Civic Center Plaza P.O. Box 1988, M-25 Santa Ana, CA 92701 10) Tim Serlet, Director of Public Works City of Tustin 300 Centennial Way Tustin, CA 92680 11) Richard Edes Industrial/Environmental Coalition of Orange County clo Gultom-Statham Transducers, Inc. 1644 Whittier Avenue Costa Mesa, CA 92627 12) Tim Greaves, Deputy Fire Marshall Huntington Beach Fire Department 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 13) Mark Asturias, Economic Dev. Manager City of Garden Grove 11222 Acacia Parkway Garden Grove, CA 92640 14) Judy Jarvis, Director California Trade & Commerce Agency 750 B Street, Suite 1830 San Diego, CA 92101 15) Jack Coffey Energy Management/UtiRies Coordinator Disneyland P.O. Box 3232 Anaheim, CA 92803 16) Steve Brown, Plant Engineer LNP Engineering 1831 E. Carnegie Santa Ana, CA 92705 o 17) Sherwin D. Yoelin, Operator-Partner Columbine Associates 1439 Bonnie Jean Road La Habra Heights, CA 90631 18) Anal Syresh Shah, President Excello Circuits 1924 Nancita Circle Placentia, CA 92870 19) Kenny Hom, Environmental Engineer Kwikset Corporation 516 E. Santa Ana Street Anaheim, CA 92803 20) Steven Liebermann, Vice President Anaheim Mills Corporation 5420 E. La Palma Anaheim, CA 92807 21) Steve Woodroof, President & CEO Ideal Uniform Rental Service P.O. Box 2259 Garden Grove, CA 92642-2259 22) Joe Valinsky,Senior Manager McDonnell Douglas Aerospace 5301 Boise Avenue, Mail Station 28-1 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 23) Don Rasmussen, Environmental Specialist Rockwell International 3370 Miraloma Avenue-D/168-AB1O Anaheim, CA 92803 24) Greg Davis, Dir. of Quality Control Seven-up/RC Bottling Company of Southern California 3220 E. 26th Street Vernon, CA 90023-4298 25) Jake Grubb, Executive Director Surfrider Foundation P.O. Box 2704-86 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 26) Bob Sirbert, Conservation Chair Sierra Club of Orange County 1308 E. Fairway Drive Orange, CA 92666 27) Jaye Apperson Balboa Angling Club A & Bay Streets Balboa, CA 92661 28) Paul Snow, President Golden Rain Foundation P.O. Box 2069 Seal Beach, CA 90740 m 1 List for Plannina Advisory Committee September 17, 1996 1) Mary Beth Broeren City of Huntington Beach P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648-2702 2) Alicia Iverson 1208 E. Rose Avenue Orange, CA 92667 3) Dr. William Gayk Califomia State University, Fullerton P.O. Box 34080 Fullerton, CA 92634-9480 4) Jack Roggenbuck Orange Coast District Department of Parks and Recreation 3030 Avenida de Presidents San Clemente, CA 92672 5) Donald Schulz Surfrider Foundation 2722 Mainway Drive Los Alamitos, CA 90720 6) John Kennedy Orange County Water District P.O. Box 8300 Fountain Valley, CA 92728 7) Richard A. Martin U.S. Department of Interior Bureau of Reclamation Southern California Area Office 27710 Jefferson Avenue, #201 Temecula, CA 92590-2628 8) Kamran Dadbeh City of Cypress 5275 Orange Avenue Cypress, CA 90630 9) Roger Summers Chairman Santa Ana Heights Redev. Project Advisory Committee 20292 Birch Street Newport Beach, CA 92660 10) Gary Gray 2524 Harbor Boulevard Costa Mesa, CA 92626 11) Charles Kim 12641 Industry Street Garden Grove, CA 92641 12) Alexis Strauss U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105-3901 13) John Hingtgen do Mary Rossi 2660 Elden, Suite 103 Costa Mesa, CA 92627 14) Steven Wong do Larry Honeyborne Orange County Environmental Health 2009 E. Edinger Santa Ana, CA 92705 15) Edward Gala 20612 Kelvin Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92646 16) 'Mark Asturias, Economic Dev. Manager City of Garden Grove 11222 Acacia Parkway Garden Grove, CA 92642 17) Mark Adelson CRWQCB 3737 Main Street Suite 500 Box 1 Riverside, CA92501-3339 t 18) R.J. Schwichtenberg Newport Bay Watershed Greens 4141 Fireside Circle Irvine, CA 92714 19) Satoru Tamaribuchi The Irvine Company 550 Newport Center Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 20) 'Greg Davis, Dir. of Quality Control Seven-up/RC Bottling Company of Southern California 3220 E. 26th Street Vernon, CA 90023-4298 Also serving on Rate Advisory Committee Investigation and Repair of CSDOC's I20-inch Outfall Alternatives - Capacities and Costs Estimated Construction Additional Flow cost per cost 01 capacity(2) mgd ") Alternative ($ millions) (mgd) ($ million) Average High Tide Tide 1. Automatic and gate 9 5 17 1.80 2. Add pans al. Extend diffuser by extending the 80-inch diffuser 19 4 17 4.75 secuon a.2 Extend 72-inch diffuser 11 3 15 3.65 b. Add ports pnternal) 1.5 7 1 B 0.21 c. Add ports (eldemap 15 7 18 2.14 3. Flow relief upstream of diffuser a. 48-inch WIWI gate 9 20 30 0.45 b. 60-inch oullef gate 9 25 35 0.36 a 72-inch oullel gate 9.5 30 38 0.32 Z7 Parallel 1204nch barrel a-1 5,OW feel of pipe (near shore) 42 25 35 1.68 a.2 5.000 feet of pipe (deep water) 30 25 35 1,20 b.1 10,000 feet of pipe (near shore) 75 77 96 0.97 b.2 10,000 feet of pipe (deep water) 63 77 9s 0.82 W 15,000 feet of pipe (near shwa) 95 132 153 0.72 a2 15,000 feel of pipe (deep water) 1 83 132 153 1 0.63 Investigation and Repair of CSDOC's I20-inch Outfall Alternatives - Capacities and Costs (cont.) 5. Discharge of secondary treated effluent to the exist 78-inch outlall al With disinfection -gravity flow 4 to 10 sotMO) 90 ONO 0.07 to 0.17 a2 With dlsinfection - pumped 181024 170M 170 01 0.11 to 0.14 b.1 Without disinfection - gravity flow 3 6o 90 0r 0.05 b.2 Without dislnfectlan - pumped 16 170 a 170 r9r 0.09 6. Dlspharge of secondary treated effluent to the extended 7&inch outlall 19.D00 ft extenslonl a.1 With disinteotion - gravity flow 441050 45�01 75 RM 0.96 to 1.11 a.2 Winh disinfection -pumped 58 to 64 1700 1170 M ON to 0.38 b.1 Without disinfection - gravity flow 43 450 75 0> 0.96 b.2 Without disinfection - pumped 56 1700 170 0> 0.33 7. Discharge of advanced primary and secondary treated effluent to the existing 78-inch oulfell a. Wish ftrtfatAOn 18 to 24 250M(4) 260 AN 0.07 to 0.10 b. Without disinfection 16 250r,�t4j 260 014 006 8. Discharge of advanDDd primary and secondary treated effluent to ihs extended 784nch oudsll (DWO ft exxension) a. With ffismfection 58 to 64 215 M4 220 0'wi 02710 0.30 b. Without disinfection 56 215M41 220 at<i 0.26 9. Discharge of disinfected secondary heated effluent to the Santa Ana River 410 10 80 80 0.05 to 0.13 Strategic Plate Workshop No. 3 to September 21, 1996 'k tat have we reviewed fit V rkshops 1 attd 2? Reviewed the proposed Strategic Plan Reviewed pending renewal of ocean discharge permit Reviewed preliminary demographics information /TYkiat have we reviewed itt rkshops 1 and 2? Discussed need for water reclamation Discussed critical success factors for Strategic Plan gas I I nvestigallon,cleaning and repair of our primary and emergency ocean ouHalIs Increase capacity of existing ocean disposal system to avoid building a new ocean outfell Peak wet weather flow reduction Financial study to determine options for: Collecling connection fees and user charges Long-term capital financing P as I Treatment, Reuse and Disposal Determine secondary treatment requirement Review both existing and future water reclamation Review biosolids disposal options P0II Public Participation, California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) Review she mauves Solicit input from special interest groups,cities, regulators and the public to determine the best plan Plan subject to CEQA requirements prior to approval ch ule 9% 1997 rvrr mi Yw en PoA$EI ort eu rm mn un mr rvx w �m mwyay.Ckan aM P pen O[aan Outla4 Mnrepemenld Peet nm:f Rnnnwl Molpcb PHq$E II �IPHq$Enlll is wwm v,nroaelnn.cenq sm s>-yen ve n 11 gPhn Le""I ".� Phase / Project I it Investigation and Repair of Ocean Oulfall Pr ject Goals Increase capacity of existing ocean outfall/disposal facilities Investigate condition of oulfall facilities and recommend repair and strengthening projects Oat is the Outfall System? Outfall pumping facilities Operating 120-inch, 5-mile pipeline Standby 78-inch, 1-mile pipeline k Emergency discharge to Santa Ana River Pr Yea Status Taken core samples of 1970 120-inch outfall and 1952, 78-inch outfall Issued proposal for diving services to measure sediment in outfall, install testing equipment,and close 78-inch end gate Capacity analysis completed Aizaluatiou of ocean - Charge alternatives 1)Open end gate on 120-inch outfall 2)Extend 120-inch outfall diffuser 3)Add flow relief structure to 120- inch outfall luatioa of ocean harge alternatives 4)Add parallel 120-inch barrel 5)Discharge secondary effluent to 78-inch outfall 6)Discharge secondary effluent to extended 78-inch outfall �c��luatio/t of ocean ccltargealtertatives 7)Discharge primary and secondary effluent to 78-inch outfall 8)Discharge primary and secondary to extended 78-inch ouffall 9)Discharge secondary effluent to Santa Ana River <�)eraative 1 - open end gate P �o Y n'fii��nT�eJ 1i1i77 - r n'/7fii7/Jn' Oi CiJ9ofpiiii - rj n'd ii ii i/J 7TT�fi%/f/ii/;FfX;? ij n`R lf7ii/l fF 17rr�rrr; y:,rrr-,�/ /i�pris�r� r �usrt/({ 6ar/surss. g egjuffl, , 1liijiii0 Oi ii/Siil� lajlrrglivr q/rrtaIM ,r artr�rru�j� �Gw � a \ ` ; of a ys 9V »:. . . .. . . , z� � essineitt of condition olves the following future steps Internal inspection Outfall cleaning Hydraulic analysis/model General repair �l Phase I Project 2 Management of Peak Hydraulic Discharge walsRs 6ullslxe to Alloedeo moll to Aouenboil pup saanos ayl Moll ayl to apniiu6ew llwano aauiuualap I is moll jayleam lam Need @Jpueq of papaau sluawanadwl wals6s ayl aulwialep of ss000ad dals-oml a buisn aje sloplsld aql pepaau se 6luo s'apgpeJ Mau apinmd seg!Ilpe)6upsixe to esn aLn szlwpdp eminl ayl ui pue mou Alleolwouona pue Rloellaj smolt head eonpay :ol aAe s06uapeyc sPpISICI apt i,HOzfJavpnam7a d a3nunul 01 711103 am a l � fl OF, t 2 uses: ,detailed system data to analyze specific wet weather problems in the collection,treatment, disposal system r goal of die first step is to wer these quesdous: How much flow do we expect to see? Where is it coming from? How often will it occur? What do we have to work with at present? What do we need to accommodate the flow in the future? �e�(irst step uses available �fopnation to determine system pe formauce daring wet weather INPUTS OUTPUTS RBbeN 2 ® $S roN In Seelem Opacity .Akusi ngflow accounting, the Dts 'cts can determine the frequency system flow exceedences Plant Influent y"1'y Same Are xx y River •a.en ovlfall. Storage ,/hrkw do we measure Nq�yfiitration and inflow (III)? 1/1 is generally discussed in terms of an "R"value "R"is the amount of rainfall enlenng the collection system compared to the total volume of rainfall "R"_ Veto.of rainlau an,arm,the.1leggn system Volume of rainfall ever to entire collection solem 'elli, infall events cause the flows at the frejonentplants to increase due to • rltrahon and inflow Precpftalen InlilVatgMnllOW base Wasmxaler �— FbW ilkE sups from the analysis of four show that"R"values for the OC system average about 0.7% Storm Ewnt Volume Porlod Rainfall m R Jan 1995 WbiWnpal 0.5orlongal 0.60% Feb INS 31bdWn,aJ 02biWnWl 0.75% INamh INS 32billionpal 0,25billongal 079% Jr.less 19 blllbn pal 0.1 billion gal Ogg% studies of other collection systems, ' alues have typically ranged ni 2%to 5% 1. Oakland fill e 8 2 CM1erblle (2.5) g 3. owner (Sal j 4. GaMnsion (5.0) 5. Greenville Ise) q 6. Walnat GM (5.0) 7. GSDOC (0.7) fw have the Districts been able to pre fit discharge to the Santa Aria ver in the past? Pump down influent trunk sewers to provide in-pipe storage Use interplant lines to store flows Use standby tankage at both plants for storage (0y1)a5erols uoeen!e�e3 v.o!i 3 �a IW92)P6W OSE=^o!tl xa9— I966gPBWotZ=uold asv8 �� Mwm5=NpeavlRYnoyay@i rye ywlE[ .lan/y nuv oluns alp of aR1my�i,p /Ulplalod saanpa.l os/o a8alols ulal8 . (9y1�a5ca15 uWez!ienb3 mo!j 15960PSw o>z^mo!i uwx9•Ni�ea�lieµmyw!�i pre yni.e[ �O p[w tNt�Naema nepm Pma2: /lnfjno 1/Jlll_ n 'fallaRlalua alp,fo asnfo Foua if ayJ soonpa.l 08ufol.s'lualsF'.s-ul Rnlp /awl n¢aebe�!i�ro � Po P6w70" moo 19661)P6w 0.Z=molf BseO—' saauapaa mot/]al/Nam lam fo F'auanba at ' sasoaaaap 67/audna puflno Rursuaaj7 flo can the Districts do in the W1re to handle peak flows? Reduce flow red„ce baee now redu inlillealipMnllow Provide He.equalizalbn in colleeion system in plants Increase discharge capacity ma'mize use of 1W Miss gae21e)a'ourall w1hicnar level treatment discheye to Santa Ma River wAigher level treatment Pr 'ug U all together Project 2 will incorporate the findings of Project t to develop the overall peak flow management program. Adil;lue of involving N�Aeholders Considers many points of view Improves"buy-in" Provides a"fresh look" Develops best solutions w are we involving the 4st eliolders is the evelopment of this program? Formation of advisory committees Consultation with regulators Involvement of public and Board of Directors ate Advisory Coounittee is i osed of the Major User Categories Industrial I Commercial Residential to Planning Advisory Committee Rs mposed of a cross-section Interests PAC �eWappui �o lawlp�ayua'anlen ou saq pa ic amen iewapam eiue �p aryen pmip awog ssw m s4;lsip Buinalyae U, ®' ualwapisum ryap�wi uy doissiw m s�aulsld 6Lineiyae col uo9eiapisum�okw y .ro)JDf'Ti�B aowas algeilaJ sapinad sluewannbei Rau96e pool pue trio saaan - yuawuonnuo pue ypeaq oilgnd sloalad sluawailnbaa NopInbei sloe" alglsea7 Rlleotugoa 1 sajdlmyd gD,49> glnb3 6)grgelomisuoo/awil RIIIIgeladO 6V1lge!led agueldeoae ollgnd ubgoaloid elgawgwlAU3 owmdaooe kolaln6eH uolloajoid ylleaq allgnd Isop /4loedeooA.\ DUa)UJ uoyvD1Oi1�;;� T advisory committees ,kev9op recommendations for sions by the Board of Directors Board of Direotors —Recmnmed.v., PAC Mc 8'qtricts commitment to nge County's environment Water reclamation Water conservation Source control and pollution prevention Air quality Biosolids reuse Joint Boards of Directors WorkehQp No. 3 Questionnaire Our Quarterly Board Strategic Planning Workshops are intended to provide tlte.information you require to make policy decisions,to obtain your input during the planning process'and to inform and update you on staffs progress. To help us better meet these goals,we'd like your feedback on this third Strategic Planning Workshop. Your comments will assist us in planning future events. September Workshop Following a brief overview of the projects comprising Phase I of the Strategic Plan, staff member Dave Ludwin gave a presentation on the progress and preliminary findings of Project 1,the Investigation and Repair of the Ocean Outfall. Dave Ludwin reviewed the alternatives being considered for increasing capacity of the outfall system. The second half of the workshop focused on Project 2, Management of Peak Hydraulic Discharge and the relationship between Projects 1 and 2. Lary Roesner of the consulting firm of Camp,Dresser&McKee Inc. presented the results of the first step of the process in determining the improvements needed to handle peak wet weather flow. Staff member Blake Anderson discussed the relationships between Projects 1 and 2, and presented the process for selecting the most appropriate overall flow management plan. 1. Did you find this workshop valuable? Yes_ No Why? 2. Please rate the following: Dave Ludwin Excellent_ Good_ Fair_ Poor "Project 1,Investigation and Repair of Ocean Outfall" Lary Roesner Excellent_ Good_ Far_ Poor "Project 2,Management of Peak Hydraulic Discharge" Blake Anderson Excellent_ Good_ Fair_ Poor "Relationship Between Projects 1 and 2 and Decision-Making Process" 3. How could we have improved this workshop? Overall Program Evaluation 1. Are the workshops meeting your information needs? Yes_ No Why? 2. Is Saturday morning still the best time for you to attend a Board Workshop? Yes_ No Alternative days/times 3. Our next Workshop will he in January. Do you have a suggestion for theme? content? presenter(s)? 4. Do you have any additional comments for improving Board Strategic Planning Workshops? Thank you for taking the time to complete this questionnaire. Please fax this form to Michelle Tuchman,Director of Communications, by Tuesday, October 1, 1996. The fax number is 962- 0356. MEETING DATE: TIME: FOAM DISTRICTS: /..lr S. L. Z A/ l3&4 DISTRICT I JOINT BOARDS IMORNOI ........... MC OUMM ........ _ IKERRYI ... ...... .. .. BOWMAN . ....... . _ IHMRYRSCHAFERI ..... FERRYMAN ........ (FORSYTHE) ... ... .... BROWN ........... ICOONRI ........... MURRIY .......... ISCOTR ........ . .... WLLINS .......... .AC — IPOTTSI ............ SALTAREW ........ (MBAY) ...... ....... COX . ............ — ISTEDIM) ........... STANTON ......... ICOX1 ............... DEMY ........... �L/ — (SEW ............... DENES ............JIG DISTRICT MUER) ............. DETTLOW ......... JG (DOWNM........... ECKENRODE ........ IPARKFRI ............ DUNIAP .......... . — (OULLW60N1 ......... WELCH ........... . . — IDOWNEY)............ EENROOE ....... . — (SCOTI ............ COLUNS .......... . — CX IPERRYRSCHAMRI ...... WARYMAN ........ . I — ISELLI . . ............ DSNES ............ IANDERSONI .......... ROM ........... J� — IPARKERI ........... DUNLAP........... (MARSHAW .......... GRIFFIN ........... JL — IANDMIION) ......... ROM ............ M'ELCH1 ............. GULUMSON ........ . IMORFNOI ........... MCOUIGAN ........ IWARDI ............. HAMMOND ........ . . ICOONTZI ........... MURPMY .......... — — IBAUERI ............. LEWIS ........... 6/ IBANKHEADI ......... NORBY............ IMINERI ............. UMN .............al-AICETI............ BINGES ........... (MOUND) ............ MC OUIOAN........ — ISTEINERI ........... STANTON ......... (COONUI ............ MURK .......... IDALY) ... .......... 2EMEL ............ (MNKHEAD) .......... HORSY I.......... y IEVANS) ............. RICE ............. DISTRICT3 (FOTMI ............. MLTAREW........ IOOZSONI ........... MPE'N ........... IDOTSON) ............ SAMM ........... .f — RLATI............ SINGER ..........r RIAKEII............. SINGER ........... KE (KERRY) BOWMAN.......... — — VIEWERS. .. WANTON ......... _ IFORSYMEI ......... SHOWN ........... IBTANTONI ........... BIEINFA .......... _ ISCDTR ............ COLLINB .......... — IMILLEAI ............. SWAN ............ AG (PARKER ........... DUNLAP........... _ — — M'AHLBTR0NH ........ WLVIA .... ....... IANDERSONI ......... ROM ............ . . . (OULLOISON) .......... WELCH ........... IMARSHAW ......... GRIFIN ........... _ — — IDALYI ...... ........ ZEMEL .. ......... _ — — IMUM ............ LEIPZIG ........... — INNER) ............ LOIN ............. . . IMORENOI........... MCOUIGAN ........ MIFF OTHERS IBANKHEADI ......... NORBY............ ANDERBON . L/ WOODRUM IEVANB) ............ RICE ............. SAW, ..... — ANDRUS .... (6TEINERI ........... STANTON ......... . . HOme ... — DEMIR ..... � NAMLSTROMI ....... SYLVIA ........... . — JONK ..... _ KNOW ..... (DALY) ............. ZEMEL ............ . . — KYLE ..... .e LEE........ UNDER .... _ LWDSTROM.. DISTRICTS LUDWIN ... NINON...... IMX) .............. DMAY............ MCDNYRE.. :9 MAW...... ISTANTONI .......... COXSTENO ...... ....... OOTEN .... _ STONE ..... (DEMYI ............ COX ........... PEIERMAN ........ STR® ........ DISTRICT 8 TULHMAN.. ........ _ IPERRYISMAWRI ..... FERRYMAN......... WMEATLEY ........ (COX) .............. DEMY............ WILSON .. .......... � ISTANTONI . ......... SIEINEII........... •••••....• ..........— DISTRICT7 """"' """" NAM) ............ MMMOND......... IROTTSI ............ SALTAREW ........ . . (LOX) .............. DEMY............ (WRRYRSCHAFMJ ..... FERRYMAN......... IMORENO)........... MCGUTAAN ........ . . . ICOONRI ........... AIURPHY ........., . . ISTANTONI .......... STEWER........... DISTRICT II IMUER) ............ LEIPZIG ........... IBAUER ............ DETTLOW ......... _ — — ISTEWEIRI ........... STANTON ......... — — DISTRICT IS IWELMI ............ GULUXSON ........ _ (DALYI ............. ZEWL ............ _ MARKER) ........... DUNIAP........... ICOONMD ........... MWIMY .......... _ _ _ [STANTON$ .........• Wilmil........... DISTRICT 13 (POTTSI ............ SALTANW ........ ICOONT21 ........... MUMMY .......... — —WARD) ............ HAMMOND......... — ISTANTON) .......... STEINYI........... IMILLERI ............ SWAN ............ . . . JSWMOD.BS%DIRECTOR\DL=, 09116196 ui tl l tq � c IV112 � 5 i �l �� u 1 - COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES STRATEGIC PLANNING WORKSHOP SEPTEMBER 21 , 1996 R III CiS OF p9g9 z � u a • E ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 ROLL CALL A Strategic Planning Workshop of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,2, 3,5,6,7,11, 13,and 14 of Orange County, California,was held on September 21, 1996,at 9:00 a.m.,in the Districts'Administrative Offices. Follow/ng the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1,2,3,6,7, 11 and 14 as follows: ACTIVE ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO.1: x Pat McGuigan,Chair _ Ted R. Moreno x James M.Ferryman,Chair pro ten _ Arthur Perry x Mark A. Murphy _ Joanne Coon . Thomas R. Satarelli Jim Pole a Roger Stanton Wlliam G.Steiner DISTRICT NO.2: _x Norman Z.Eckenrode,Chair Carol Downey g Daniel T.Welch,Chair pro tam John M.Gullixson _ • John Collins George Scott • Barry Denes Bob Bell -x-- Burnie Dunlap Glenn Parker x James H.Flom Steve Anderson _II_ Pat McGuigan _ Ted R.Moreno • Mark A Murphy Joanne Coon • Chris Norhy Don Bankhead --x— Sheldon Singer George L Zlaket • Roger Stanton William G.Steiner g Bob Zemel Tom Day DISTRICT NO.3: x Sal A Sapien,Chair Harry M.Dotson _X__ Sheldon Singer,Chair pro tam George L Zlaket * Water Bowman Gail Kerry _* George Brown Madyn Bruce Hearings * John Collins George Scott * Burnie Dunlap Glenn Parker * James H.Flom Steve Anderson * Don R.Griffin Patsy Marshall -L_ Victor Leipzig Ralph Bauer Wally Linn Eva G.Miner x Pat McGuigan Ted R.Moreno x Chris Norby Don Bankhead x Margie L Rice _ James V.Evans a Roger Stanton _ Wiliam G.Steiner a Charles Sylvia _ Robert Wahlstrom a Bob Zemel _ Tom Day DISTRICT NO.5: X Jan Debay,Chair _ John C.Cox,Jr. a William G.Steiner,Chair pro tam _ Roger Stanton a John C.Cox,Jr. _ Jan Debay DISTRICT NO.S: x James M.Ferryman,Chair _ Arthur Perry _II_ Jan Debay,Chair pro lam _ John C.Cox,Jr. a William G.Steiner _ Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO.T: a Barry Hammond,Chair Mike Ward x Thomas R.SalmmIll,Chair pro tam Jim Potts x Jan Debay _ John C.Cox,Jr. x James M.Ferrymen _ Arthur Perry x Pat McGuigan Ted R.Moreno _IL_ Mark A. Murphy Joanne Coontz g William G.Steiner Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO.11: x Victor Leipzig,Chair Ralph Bauer x Shiley Dettloff,Chair pro tam Ralph Bauer a Roger Stanton William G.Steiner DISTRICT NO.13: a John M.GulluBon,Chair game)T.Welch g Bob Zemel,Chair pro tam Tom Day Bumie Dunlap Glenn Parker * Mark A.Murphy Joanne Coontz g William G.Steiner Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO.14: x Thomas R.Satarelli,Chair Jim Potts Mark A Murphy,Chair pro tam Joanne Coontz • Barry Hammond Mike Ward _• William G.Steiner Roger Stanton Peer A.Swan Darryl Miller -2- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 09/21/96 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Don McIntyre, General Manager, Blake P. Anderson, Assistant General Manager - Operations, Judith A. Wilson, Assistant General Manager - Administration, Penny Kyle, Board Secretary, David Ludwin, Gary Streed, Michelle Tuchman, Nancy Wheatley Strategic Planning Workshoo Joint Chair Collins and General Manager Don McIntyre welcomed all who attended the third quarterly Strategic Planning Workshop and gave a brief summary of what would be covered in the presentation. Dave Ludwin, Director of Engineering, discussed the Preliminary Results of the Ocean Outfall Investigation; Larry Roesner, Camp Dresser and McKee spoke on the proposed alternatives for Managing Peak Flows and Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager, Operations, discussed the relationship between Projects 1 and 2, and the Decision-Making Process. Adiournment The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 12:00 noon. Secretary of thYBoar# of Directors of County Sanitation Districts J:\WPD=BSWIN%M2196. - 3 -