HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-09-25 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
September 18, 1996
NOTICE OF MEETING
pine: JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
(7141962-2411 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14
mailing address:
PO Be. drew: OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
.
Fountain Valley,GA
92728-e127 WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 25, 1996 - 7:30 P.M.
stleet address:
10944 Ellis Avenue
Fot 9270&7ole DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Member The Regular Meeting of the Joint Boards of Directors of County Sanitation
Agana. Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, will
0 be held at the above location, time and date.
calla.
Anaheim
Brea
Buena Park
cypress
Fountain Valley
Fullerton Bo 5ecr dry
Huntington Beach
Irvine
Le Habra
Le Palma
Loa Alamitos
Newport Batch Tentatively - Scheduled Upcoming Meetings
Orange
Placards
Saute Are
$
eas Beach
erna, STRATEGIC PLANNING WORKSHOP - Saturday, September 21, 1996, at 9:00 a.m.
Tustin
Villa Park STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday,September 25, 1996, at 5:30 p.m.
Yorbe Linda
cauncy ar orange OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND - Wednesday, October 2, 1996 at 5:30 p.m.
TECHNICAL SERVICES
Sanitary Districts PLANNING,DESIGN AND - Thursday, October 3, 1996, at 5:30 p.m.
coats Mesa CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE
Garden Grove
Mrdway GiCy FINANCE,ADMINISTRATION AND - Wednesday,October 9, 1996,at 5:30 p.m.
Water Dietricta HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE
Irvine Reach STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday, October 23, 1996,at 5:30 p.m.
A Public Marewater and Enorormental Management Agency committed ne Protecting the Environment Since 1954
&N—`
s
JOINT BOARD MEETING DATES
Month Joint Board Meeting
October Oct 23, 1996
November Nov 20, 1996
December Dec 18, 1996
January Jan 22, 1997
February Feb 26, 1997
March Mar 26, 1997
April Apr 23, 1997
May May 28, 1997
June June 25, 1997
July July 23, 1997
August August 27, 1997
September September 24, 1997
October October 22, 1997
^ r
1, OUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
t
September 19, 1996
g
[714)9682411 To the Chair and Members
411
of the Joint Boards of Directors
mailing eddreau
RO.Box 8127 Subject: Board Letter
Fountain Valle,..CA
B272"127
.treats :
10844 Ellis Aden Avenue The following are items that you may find interesting. If you need additional
Fai m.m v.iiey,CA information on any of the items, please call me.
92708-7018
Correction to Article in The Register
In the middle of August, The Register published an article about the performance of
Member public agency treasuries in Orange County. In the case of the Districts, there were
Agencies two errors in the table which listed the size and performance of the various
• portfolios.
Cities
Anaheim The anticipated future yield of the Districts' portfolios as they existed on June 30,
Brae 1996 was reported as 5.55% but should have been 6.36%, while the actual yield for
Buena Park 1995-96 of$21.4 million, which was reported as 5.20% should have been 5.97%.
0ypress
Fountain Valley
Fullerton While the primary goal of the Districts' investment policy is safety, followed by
Huntington BeaneIry liquidity and then yield, it should be noted that the yield performance of our
Le Habrera
portfolios, principally managed by PIMCO, ranks in the top 5 of the 44 agencies
Le Palm. listed in the article.
Los Alamitos
Newport Beech
orange Orange County Register Article - Pringle's Merger Bill Dies in End
Placentia
Banta Ana
Saal Beach Attached is an article from The Register regarding Pringle's merger bill which meant
Stantan to create an Orange County Special District of 25 water and sewer districts. With
villa Park the close of the Legislature's work for the year, the bill died in the Senate.
yorbe Linea
County of Orange Orange County Register Article -Water Bill Has Funds For Orange County
Barite,y Oletrict. Attached is an article about a bill which has passed The House of Representatives
and which contains a provision for the first phase of a $151 million Orange County
Cost. Mesa project to treat sewage and recycle it for drinking water. This bill would authorize
Gordon y ove
City spending committees to appropriate mone for the project to reclaim 100 million
Mleway City P 9Y P 1
gallons of sewage a day from the Districts. The money has yet to be appropriated!
Water Districts
Won Bench Letter To Barbara Boxer and Dianne Feinstein Re: Reclamation Recycling and
Water Conservation Act of 1996 (Bills H.R. 3660 and S 901)
Attached are copies of the letters sent to Ms. Boxer and Ms. Feinstein requesting
their support for the Orange County Reclamation Project at the Senate level.
Bill H.R. 3660 (Reclamation Recycling and Water Conservation Act of 1996), passed
A Public Wasteweter and Environmental Men.gement Agency Committed to Proaecting the Environment Since 1954
Chair and Members of
the Joint Boards of Directors
Page 2
September 19, 1996
by the House of Representatives, authorizes the Bureau of Reclamation to provide
federal construction assistance for water reclamation treatment and distribution
facilities. Section 1624 of this bill would authorize Phase 1 of the Orange County
Reclamation Project.
Bill S 901 (bill to amend the Reclamation Projects Authorization and Adjustment Act
of 1992), which is similar to Bill H.R. 3660 but at the Senate level, does not include
support for the Orange County Reclamation Project; therefore, the Districts' is asking
that Ms. Boxer and Ms. Feinstein support adoption by the Senate of H.R. 3660, or in
the alternative, amend S 901 to include support for the Orange County Reclamation
Project.
Update On EMA
EMA, the consultant that prepared the "Competitiveness Assessment Report"for the
Districts, has been retained to provide professional services related to: (1)selecting
and training an O&M team called the "Districts'Assessment and Reinvention Team"
(DART); (2) develop a team charter and purpose; (3) prepare a report that identifies
the O&M business practices that should be changed and determine the productivity
improvements gained with the business practice changes; and (4) develop a
schedule and costs related to reinventing the Operations and Maintenance
Department. Phase III of the work estimated to begin after the first of the year and
which may take three years, would implement the recommendations from the work
already underway.
The EMA Competitiveness Assessment Report has identified a 15 to 20 percent
O&M budget savings potential by property automating the treatment plant, cross
training staff, combining O&M (done), improving the preventive maintenance
program, and operating more unattended facilities.
Letter to Curt Pringle Re: Bolsa Chica State Beach
Attached is a letter sent by Joint Chair Collins to Mr. Pringle detailing the chronology
of events regarding the elevated bacterial concentrations along Bolsa Chica State
Park. The problem was detected during the Spring and Summer of 1995 and it was
determined that the cause was a leaking State Parks Sewer. An interim solution is
in place but has not solved all the problems.
State Parks has indicated that they are pursuing two authorization scenarios to solve
this problem, but because of existing budgetary and procurement constraints, State
Parks estimates authorization may not occur until late in the fiscal year and repairs
Chair and Members of
the Joint Boards of Directors
Page 3
September 19, 1996
still would not be complete until 1997 or early 1998.
We will continue to work with the State to expedite this project.
CASA Letter to Member Agencies Re: SCA 39 -(Constitution Revision
Committee)
Attached is a copy of the letter from CASA regarding the Conference Committee's
recommendation on SCA 39 that the requirement for each county to establish a
local Community Charter Commission will not be a part of the package this year.
CASA and other special district associations had opposed the California Constitution
Revision Commission's recommendation that Community Charter be constitutionally
mandated.
There are no direct implications for any of CASA's member agencies regarding this
measure and to date, it is still unclear whether there is necessary support for the
scaled-back constitutional amendment to be placed on the supplemental ballot in
November.
Proposition 218
At the September FAHR Committee, Proposition 218 was discussed. The
Committee was informed that if it passed, the initiative process could be used to
negate or roll back user fees and that the procedural requirements to mail detailed
information to every parcel and hold a public hearing to extend or increase user fees
would probably cost the Districts approximately a quarter of a million dollars
annually. The Committee decided to take no position on the measure but directed
staff to prepare informational material on the impacts of Proposition 218 on this
agency. The Committee also requested information on the ballot arguments. On
September 13, Judy Wilson attended a briefing in Sacramento. Attached is a copy
of the ballot arguments as well as "Guidelines for Public Agencies Regarding Ballot
Measures." These guidelines were developed by a group of attorneys working for
large water agencies in the State in close collaboration with the Fair Political
Practices Commission's General Counsel.
Arguing in favor of Proposition 218 are Joel Fox, President, Howard Jarvis
Taxpayers Association, Jim Conran, President Consumers First, and Richard Gann,
President of Paul Gann's Citizens Committee. Signing the argument opposing
Proposition 218 are Howard Owens, Congress of California Seniors, Lois Tinson,
President, California Teachers Association and Ron Snider, President, California
Association of Highway Patrolman.
a
Chair and Members of
the Joint Boards of Directors
Page 4
September 19, 1996
Sangermano Trial
The Sangermano trial has been postponed to February due to conflict in Attorney
and Court schedules.
Orange County's Bankruotcv Case Status
Attached is a letter from Pillsbury Madison and Sutro to Pool Participants which
provides status of the various post-confirmation issues in the County's bankruptcy
case. The status report provides information on the County's focus regarding
routine type of objections and the County's fling of six other actions against third
parties in addition to its adversary proceedings against Merrill Lynch.
Orange County's Ootion B Pool Participants
Attached is a fax from Pillsbury Madison and Sutro regarding Option B Pool
Participants (SB 2169). This legislation would have enhanced the litigation posture
of Option B claims against the County and third parties; however, it was not signed
by the Governor.
Soecial Edition of The News Pipeline -An Interview With Bob Ooten
Attached is a special edition of The News Pipeline detailing an interview with Bob
Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance. This is the seventh edition issue
providing interview questions to Executive Management staff members. The next
edition will feature an interview with Gary Streed, Director of Finance.
Changing Times Newsletter
Attached is a newsletter regarding the visit to two Colorado Treatment Plants by six
Districts' employees and their recommendations for our own reengineering efforts.
The employees returned with enthusiasm and insight in addition to many new ideas
on how to better implement change that benefits everyone.
Districts to Host City Managers COG
The Districts is making our meeting facilities available to city and county officials as
part of our external-audience outreach efforts. The first two groups we will be
hosting are the City Managers for their November meeting and the Council of
Governments for their October and November regular meetings. In the future we
Chair and Members of
the Joint Boards of Directors
Page 5
September 19, 1996
hope to become a meeting site for other organizations.
Brochure From The Technical Assistance Center
As we have reported to the Joint Boards, the Source Control Division of the
Technical Services Department has been working with industries in Orange County
to provide technical assistance to improve the quality of their discharges to the
sewerage system. Attached is the first tangible product from the Technical
Assistance Center, a brochure on management of grease and oil discharges.
Grease and oil is a particular problem in our collection system, especially
downstream of restaurants. This brochure will be distributed to restaurants and
other food service operations with the help of the Restaurant Association and other
trade organizations. The brochure was designed by the Communications Division.
U.S. EPA Award
Attached is a memorandum from Mike Konyu of EPA who will be presenting an
award to Source Control staff for their help in the investigative efforts of EPA,
California EPA, and the Orange County District Attorney regarding the Venus Labs
Case in 1994.
Review of Governance in Orange County -The Government Practices
Oversiaht Committee IGPOCI Reoort
As you may know this report has been released in final form. The mission of the
25-member all volunteer citizen group was: "to create a comprehensive, objective,
and understandable source book of information on the County and other local
governments which residents and constituencies can use to evaluate and generate
proposals for change in local government. The Government Practices Oversight
Committee will synthesize the source book and the committee's outreach efforts to
produce findings and recommendations leading to a more efficient and effective
delivery of public services to the people of Orange County."
This report was developed into 3 phases:
- Fact Book
- Identify best governing principles
- Findings and recommendations
While the report focuses primarily on the County and to some extent cities, there is a
brief section on special districts. The findings and recommendation for special
districts is on pages 100 and 101. (Copies attached).
Chair and Members of
the Joint Boards of Directors
Page 6
September 19, 1996
Subsequent to the issuance of this report, the County CEO's office has developed a
separate but related document entitled "External Restructuring Policy Report." A
quick review suggests that this substantially overlaps the GPOC report. It identifies
the need to clarify county-city responsibilities and to ensure that service delivery is
appropriately assigned. There is a reference to the county relationship to the COG
as well as special districts, surface transportation issues, and regional planning.
At the County Board of Supervisors meeting on September 17, they unanimously
approved the report with some changes in wording that would give their approval of
these concepts as opposed to approving a firm policy position. The work plan,
although ambitious, calls for a special meeting with Board of Supervisors
representatives to discuss special district consolidation sometime in January.
Page four of the report is attached for your information.
If you would like additional information on any of the above items, please call me.
Donald F. McIntyre
General Manager
DFM:cmc
JIxvooncMmFw» DLimss 2w
Attachments:
Article from The Register- Pringle's Merger Bill Dies in End
Article from The Register-Water Bill Has Funds for Orange County
September 10, 1996 Letters to Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer on Reclamation
September 6, 1996 Letter to Curt Pringle on Boise Chica State Beach
August 29, 1996 Letter from CASA on Conference Committee Recommendation
Proposition 218 Guidelines for Public Agencies- Re: Ballot Measures
September 11, 1996 Fax from Pillsbury Madison & Sutro on the Bankruptcy
September 18, 1996 Fax from Pillsbury Madison & Sutro on the Bankruptcy
Special Edition of The News Pipeline -An Interview With Bob Dolan
Changing Times Newsletter- Six Districts' Employees Visit Two Colorado Plants
Brochure From The Technical Assistance Center
March 26, 1996 Letter from EPA regarding Source Control Award
Pages 4, 100 & 101 of the GPOC Report
a M o
c v o
c
'a oZ
Mat is the Problem %� ow
�m G� DD
with Oil and Grease o Z >
0. M �
in the Sewer?
Fm �� Cp
0 > N L y
0'4 m
y� � D
Clogs HelI as I r
Sewer gTease and
Y oil
Sewer Backs up
into Streets, d
ischaT es
Parking Lots,
Homes and I
Your Kitchen
the seweT
riHow You
Creates Creates
O Health
Odors
Hazards
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County
„ - How You Can Help . . .
Be Rware of the Reduce Oil Be Kind to
Sources of Grease and Grease to the the Grease Trap
Sewer Grease traps keep grease out
What is grease? of the sewers. But a grease trap
■ Scrape off can be a problem instead of
Meat Fats trays, plates a solution unless you help the
Lard and pans into grease trap do its job!
Cooking Oil waste-grease
Butter cans for recycling. • Pump and service
Shortening grease traps often.
■ Scrape grills and cooking
Where does it come from? surfaces into grease cans ■ Reduce solids going
Fryers Spoiled Food for recycling. to the grease trap.
Pots and Pans Floors
Scraps Cooking Surfaces ■ Place meat scraps,
fat or leftovers Reduce grease
in trash bins discharges by reducing
for disposal. and recycling grease.
How does it get into Even if you use additives
the sewer? ■ Put baskets in to help grease trap "digestion,”
drains to catch don't forget to maintain
Sinks solids. Use trash bins the grease traps!
Floor Drains for disposal.
Food Grinders
NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS
Name of Paper Section Page Oats -
�}.C- QP�ISE ( le�io �1-Jme/r�or, b'// dips
DISTRICTS
Pringle s PRDM t
— Midway City Sanitary and
- Santiago County Water.
' But each concession tipped the
merger bill balance elsewhere n he wm-
1plex web of water districts.When
2eim and Santa Ana moved
o cement their rights to pump
and water,- Irvine com-
lamed.
dies i n end W "They were trying to time[
What we can take,"Irvine Ranch
' � Water District director Peer
an said. "When you get into
'r people's water rights leg-
LEGISLATION: The PRINGLE: atively, that's scary."
Senate washes Out the - Consolidation A_IrtneLs efforts made the
bill whisked :, Santa Margarita Co. nervous-i
consolidation of water - = mrongn Y about any advantage Irvine I
agencies. + Assembly but might get in ground-water..
spa F..� fell in Democrat- rights. O'Neill said he let Lack,-
By RICKY YOUNG controlled yer know of his concerns.
The Orange County Register Senate. L "I'm not so crazy about'
SACRAMENTO—Republican change," O'Neill said. "They"
Curt Pringle's first bill asspeak- Ana and Anaheim. - asked me what I thought about it,-
The bell started as an effort to and I said, 'Why change it.
er scaled through the Assembly create one Orange County agen- Pringle said change is needed;
on the strength of his leadership cout of 25 water districts with and that he will try again.
—a good-government reform,he Y
said, to merge a patchwork of 1,800 employees andacombened "I would recommend these wa-
Orange County water districts. annual budget of S696 million. ter districts act as if this bell
But the bill deed with the early- Pringle hoped to streamline were enacted into law," Pringle
Sunday end of the Legislature's water service that now Bows- said. "Because it well be."
work for the year, a casualty in through several layers of govern- -
the Democrat-controlled state ment ;
Senate. The situation was highlighted'
"It met with political brinks- by the collapse of the Orange
manship," Pringle said. "It was County investment pool in De-
the only bill significant to me cember 1994, and Pringle ques-'
that was in the Senate. Things tioned why many districts had
get swallowed up like that." enough taxpayer and ratepayer
Senate Democratic leader Bill money to absorb millions of dol-
Lockyer of Hayward said he lars in losses with little effect.
heard rumblings that the bill Mergers for efficiency had
would raise water rates for poor- been recommended—to no avail
er residents of Anahaim and San- —by grand juries and other re-
ta Ana — and for former state formers for three decades. Prin-
Democratic Party Chairman gle eventually stumbled on the
Dick O'Neill's Santa Margarita same lobbying efforts that sty-
Co mied past efforts.
"Obviously, the speaker is an He scaled back the bill,calling
integral part of the Republican for several smaller-scaleconsoli-
poBtical establishment in dations among water districts—
Orange County," Lockyer said. for instance, Laguna Beach's
"I don't want to be involved in an and south Laguna's water des-'
unfairness to Democratic, poor- tricts would have been merged
at communities or to Democratic and the cities of Yorba Linda and.
businesses." Los Alamitos would have taken'
Pringle said his bill was not over separate water districts;
intended to create any such on- serving their communities.
fairness, and he said it would Some districts were exempted
have helped residents of Santa Please see DISTRICTS Page 2
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS
Name of Paper Sedlon papa Dale Sub
� C �eo,is-�er llle�io e? 9•s-5!o �'{v bill has r.nds ;oi C.C,
Water bill
has funds
for O.C.
POLITICS: The filet
phase of a water-recla-
matioD project is ap-
proved by the House.
6y JAMF3 V.Masashi
The Ornnge County Mgkter
WASHINGTON —The Homes.
of Repre..mnves . Wedne.
day Passed a water bi l that eon.
tame a provision for the first
phase of a d151 million Orange
County Project to heat sewage
and recyclelt fordrinking water.
The provision has been pushed
for more than a year by Rep.Jay
ofthan House
PPublicPbBar.o member
of the H House c Works Com-
minee.
Wednesday. three Orange
County congressmen dispatched
news releases heralding passage
of the legislation; Reps. Ron
Packard, R-0c u mide; Robert
K. Do.., R-Garden Grove;
and Kim.
Packard praised the but.and
both Corona and Kim task cmd-
it.Wm ewmmince hasjurisdic
nos over the legislation.
Credit was note concern of B W
Mats, general ..agar of the
Orange County Water District.
"This is good news,"he said.
The bill authorizes spending
comminche to appropriate mom
-ey for the project,which would
reclaim ]Op mlWan gWove of
sewage a day from a sanimnon.
district plant in Fountain Valley,
Mill.said.
'Me heated water woWd be
pumped Wong the Santa Ana
Pover to Anaheim, where It
would be treated again and to-
turned to the groundwater table.
When completed, the project
wand provide ae much ee ID Dery
coot of the water used In Orange
County, Min said. The treated
water now is dumped into the
ocean.
a COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
September 10, 1996
pl�:
r714)99224„
The Honorable Dianne Feinstein
"R�"� United States Senate
EAureWn`d".GA Washington, D.C. 20510
92]2Be,27
106"SE SUBJECT: Reclamation Recycling and Water Conservation Act of 1996
F "Wa y,M (Bills H.R. 3660 and S 901)
927M7019
Speaking for the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (Sanitation
fft"* n Districts), I request your support for the Orange County Reclamation Project.
Ag— The Sanitation Districts is a large publicly owned treatment works (POTW)
facility that treats 250 million gallons per day of wastewater and serves 2.1
°tla' million Orange County residents. This project will provide up to 100 million
ananean gallons per day of recycled water for the citizens of Orange County, and most
a , P a important, this project will reduce Orange County's dependence on imported
waters from the Sacramento Bay Delta and the Colorado River.
kwo
^°non aBBC The Metropolitan Water District has indicated that Southern California will
to Habm need to create or import another 1.1 million acre-feet of new water supplies
Lw by the year 2000 to survive drought conditions. The Reclamation Project will
Na,eg4,x&,6 provide up to 50,000 acre-feet of reclaimed water by the year 2001 with an
additional 25,000 acre-feet by the years 2010 and 2020. This reclaimed
SSA Ana water will help to reduce or remove the need for Orange County to increase
51 imports of water from Central and Northern California.
71s
vme Perk
„rAa u. The Sanitation Districts' partner in the Reclamation Project is the Orange
C ur" d Orange County Water District. Our agencies have a long history of working together
to reclaim water for the benefit of our local community. The success of our
s.en.ry o.e,w agencies has been recognized and relied upon by regulators and
c� associations throughout the State of California. The technologies developed
men C * for this project will meet all federal and state safety guidelines, remain
M.UW°tj economically feasible, and revolutionize water reclamation for years to come.
Please see the attached facility map of the Reclamation Project.
Mane RancA
On September 4, the House of Representatives passed the Reclamation
Recycling and Water Conservation Act of 1996(H.R. 3660), a bill that would
authorize the Bureau of Reclamation to provide federal construction
A PUNC Wastewater eM Enn Mnul Menage ent Agency Canmlaee t4 Fremwng"Enwe Mnt S rro 1954
The Honorable Dianne Feinstein
Page 2
September 10, 1996
assistance for water reclamation treatment and distribution facilities. Section
1624 would authorize Phase 1 of the Orange County Reclamation Project.
The Senate is considering a similar bill, S 901, a bill to amend the
Reclamation Projects Authorization and Adjustment Act of 1992.
Unfortunately, the Senate version does not include support for the Orange
County Reclamation Project. As you enter the final weeks of the legislative
session, I request that you support adoption by the Senate of H.R. 3660, or in
the alternative, amending S 901 to include support for the Orange County
Reclamation Project.
I cannot stress enough the necessity for this project to help protect
California's environment and economy. The CalFed Process has been
ongoing for many years to find a solution to the environmental and economic
problems caused by demand for water from the Sacramento Bay Delta. This
Reclamation Project would help to alleviate some of the demand for water
from this unique and precious California resource. This project is a shining
example of a community working together to meet its local needs while
considering the long-term and far-reaching consequences of its action.
If you have any questions or would like further information, please contact me
at (714) 962-2411. Thank you for your careful consideration of this project.
Donald F. Mclntyr
General Manager
DFM/JEC:wh
JMP115.50WLSTONV EADY503B .LTR
c: B. Mills, GM - OCWD
E. Sapirstein, CSDOC Consultant
J. McConnell, OCWD Consultant
The Honorable Dianne Feinstein
Page 3
September 10, 1996
bc, B. Anderson
N.W heatley
M. Moore
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
September 10, 1996
m�
prat sszzat11
The Honorable Barbara Boxer
"�Bae B z; United States Senate
�Vsk+•r^ Washington, D.C. 20510
W72BB127
1waaM�aa SUBJECT: Reclamation Recycling and Water Conservation Act of 1996
Fawn Way.cA (Bills H.R. 3660 and S 901)
92MO-MlS
Speaking for the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (Sanitation
Membu Districts), I request your support for the Orange County Reclamation Project.
AB8AO88 The Sanitation Districts is a large publicly owned treatment works (POTW)
0 facility that treats 250 million gallons per day of wastewater and serves 2.1
Co. million Orange County residents. This project will provide up to 100 million
mahaea gallons per day of recycled water for the citizens of Orange County, and most
Swah B''B important, this project will reduce Orange County's dependence on imported
r va P- waters from the Sacramento Bay Delta and the Colorado River.
Fuaermn
Beach The Metropolitan Water District has indicated that Southern California will
u need to create or import another 1.1 million acre-feet of new water supplies
u Pe. b the 2000 to survive drought conditions. The Reclamation Project will
LAs Ab xcs Y year 9 1
Na»va.:Beach provide up to 50,000 acre-feet of reclaimed water by the year 2001 with an
Pry additional 25,000 acre-feet by the years 2010 and 2020. This reclaimed
Same Ana water will help to reduce or remove the need for Orange County to increase
Seal Beach
imports of water from Central and Northern California.
raedn
m Per*
m un]a The Sanitation Districts' partner in the Reclamation Project is the Orange
cm." of Creeps County Water District. Our agencies have a long history of working together
to reclaim water for the benefit of our local community. The success of our
Bang Dist tw agencies has been recognized and relied upon by regulators and
Coate maae associations throughout the State of California. The technologies developed
G Nm Brore for this project will meet all federal and state safety guidelines, remain
AW.W�y economically feasible, and revolutionize water reclamation for years to come.
waw mavicta Please see the attached facility map of the Reclamation Project.
e.;na amen
On September 4, the House of Representatives passed the Reclamation
Recycling and Water Conservation Act of 1996(H.R. 3660), a bill that would
authorize the Bureau of Reclamation to provide federal construction
A Public waere varer and Em rcn nral Managemenr Agency Camm=ad w Prcrecuw me E..mr&me 1854
3
The Honorable Barbara Boxer
Page 2
September 10, 1996
assistance for water reclamation treatment and distribution facilities. Section
1624 would authorize Phase 1 of the Orange County Reclamation Project.
The Senate is considering a similar bill, S 901, a bill to amend the
Reclamation Projects Authorization and Adjustment Act of 1992.
Unfortunately, the Senate version does not include support for the Orange
County Reclamation Project. As you enter the final weeks of the legislative
session, I request that you support adoption by the Senate of H.R. 3660, or in
the alternative, amending S 901 to include support for the Orange County
Reclamation Project.
I cannot stress enough the necessity for this project to help protect
California's environment and economy. The CalFed Process has been
ongoing for many years to find a solution to the environmental and economic
problems caused by demand for water from the Sacramento Bay Delta. This
Reclamation Project would help to alleviate some of the demand for water
from this unique and precious California resource. This project is a shining
example of a community working together to meet its local needs while
considering the long-term and far-reaching consequences of its action.
If you have any questions or would like further information, please contact me
at (714) 962-2244111. Thank you for your careful consideration of this project.
Donald F. clntyre
General Manager
DFWJEC:wh
J:\W P17880=LSTON%R EAD`W0388.LTR
c: B. Mills, GM - OCWD
E. Sapirstein, CSDOC Consultant
J. McConnell, OCWD Consultant
The Honorable Barbara Boxer
Page 3
September 10, 1996
bc: B. Anderson
N.Wheatley
M. Moore
' P COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, -CALIFORNIA
Post-It^brand fax transmittal memo 7671 idpages.
September 6, 1996
Ph—
Honorable Curt Pringle
Speaker of the Assembly
ao va 8127 Stale of California
Yda 1 CAae7a9aia7 12865 Main Street,Suite 100
ad Garden Grove,CA 92640
-�0944 Else Momre
�Eavnmin venom,CA Dear Curt:
,,..,ez7oa•�Bte
Pursuant to my telephone conversation with Brad Wilkinson of your staff, I am providing herein
details of a situation that I believe could benefit greatly from your involvement.
The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County(Sanitation Districts)discharge treated
c1u ngendee wastewater off the coast of Orange County under permit by the Environmental Protection
th`� . , • Agency and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. The permit requires the Sanitation
Districts to measure coliform bacteria concentrations at 17 surtzone locations along the
coastline from Sunset Beach to Corona Del Mar. During the Spring and Summer of 1995,the
Allah/, Sanitation Districts'surfzone monitoring detected elevated bacterial concentrations along Boise
Chica Beach State Parks,caused by a leaking State Parks Sewer. Because of State
euene Park budgetary and procurement constraints,8 appears that re airs can not occur sooner than the
n.Park 9 ry P P
(aumein valley winter of 1997-98.
�Y,�}!$FWlermn
mwngmn Boecn
rnbe
°ie Haare Chronology of Events
Palma
#"im marnaos The Sanitation Districts discovered that bacterial concentration limits were exceeded at one to
Nerpvrt eeacn two sampling locations in the Boise Chica State Beach,in May,June,Jul and August, 1995.
'•r `•Nov 6onga P 9 R Y. 8
; a,a>,wacanoa+` <sanra ana The Sanitation Districts began special sampling to August and September 1995,which
w heal Beach e9 g P ri g 0 P
included collecting and analyzing surface and 20-foot depth samples offshore of the two
Tuai surtzone locations where elevated bacterial concentrations were measured. Analytical results
. Yale Pen: showed that the offshore samples had low concentrations Indicating that the contamination is
'be Lima, coming from the beach itself and not a source further offshore.
- 'at:orange
"tt In October 1995,the Sanitation Districts employed the engineering consulting firm Camp
Dresser and McKee Inc. (CDM) at its own expense to evaluate the system. Engineering
� �Ata drawings describing the state-owned sewer system and lift stations located within the Balsa
Gb®Mean Chica State Beach were checked and dye testing of the system was performed to detect leaks.
,fbWn wore
In March 1996,the Sanitation Districts employed a video inspection service at Its own expense
N)atm Wawcee to examine the state-owned sewer system along Bolsa Chica Beach. The results of the
-`i> Bencn inspection demonstrated that there were 44 breaks or offset joints affecting approximately half
of the length of the State Parks sewer system.
L
On June 6, 1996,Orange County Health Care Agency closed approximately two-thirds of
Bolsa Chica State Beach on the basis of continued elevated bacterial counts in surtzone
samples collected by the Sanitation Districts and the observed breaks in the Slate Parks's
«P'.r sewer system.
A Puollc Wastewarer and Endronmenral Management Agency Commate4 M wo[ecOng Ne Enrollment Since 1954
r.
Honorable Curt Pringle
Page 2
September6, 1996
On June 29, 1996,all but about 1000 feet of Bolse Chico State Beach were opened because
the State Parks Service had implemented an interim mitigation plan that met the requirements
of the County Health Care Agency and the Regional Water Quality Control Board,and
surfzone bacterial concentrations returned to acceptable levels.
On August 8, 1996,the entire beach was reopened by the County Health Care Agency and
remains open because the interim corrective measures employed by and paid for by the State
Parks have successfully reduced surfzone bacterial concentrations to consistently acceptable
levels.
Prognosis for the Future
It is the Sanitation Districts' understanding that the earliest that the sewer system can be
permanently replaced is the winter of 1997-98 because of existing budgetary and procurement
constraints imposed on the State Parks under existing State law and practice.
While the interim solution has successfully reduced bacterial concentrations in the surfzone,it
has not solved all of the problems. The State must resort to using wastehauling vacuum trucks
to empty waste from some of the lift station storage tanks that are serving as temporary
sewage holding tanks. The public is using sinks in the dressing rooms as urinals. We surmise
that beach goers are urinating in the surfzone rather than using chemical toilets. While not
contributing to fecal ccliform concentrations,these practices are certainly"gross.' The
Sanitation Districts is spending approximately$1000 per week in unreimbursed additional
monitoring costs because the County Health Care Agency and the California Regional Water
Quality Control Board want to ensure the State Parkc _ meeting bacterial concentration
standards. If they do not receive this assurance the% -il close the beach. The Sanitation
Districts'monitoring effort and expense is expended la allow the State Beach to remain open.
Repair to the system is estimated to cost between$1.0 and $1.5 million,depending upon the
design of the replacement system. The original system consists of approximately 2 miles of
vitrified clay sewer and 7lift stations necessary to carry restroom and snack bar wastes
northerly to the local sewer system operated by the Sunset Beach Sanitary District and then
subsequently to the Sanitation Districts'regional sewer system. The new system could be
simply a direct replacement of the existing design or it could be a more efficient system
consisting of only one or two pump stations. That's a life cycle and procurement decision for
the State Parks System to make.
The Sanitation Districts, at its own expense, has acted as Good Samaritans for over 14 months
by providing advice and analytical support to the State in diagnosing the problem and
proposing a permanent solution to the leaking State Parks sewer. Sanitation Districts'senior
staff have expressed a willingness to refer to its Board of Directors a proposal to help the State
further by expediting a project that would provide safe public recreational access to Boise
Chico. The Sanitation Districts would help by fast-tracking the design, construction and startup
of a replacement sewer system under a reimbursement agreement between the Sanitation
Districts and the State Parks System. This offer stands moot, however, until the State Parks
system can get authorization to proceed with the sewer system replacement project and
specific legislative authorization for a reimbursement agreement.
h
Honorable Curt Pringle
Page 3
September 6, 1996
A fast-track design of the system followed by competitive public works contract bidding and
construction will take a minimum of seven months to achieve a minimally operational
replacement system and another 3-12 months to complete all construction. State Parks has
indicated that they are pursuing two authorization scenarios. The first one would be for FY
97198. Under this scenario,the State indicates that the earliest it can potentially be authorized
to proceed with a contract with the Sanitation Districts is July 1, 1997. This implies that the
earliest a replacement system could be operating is the first quarter of 1998. Under a second
scenario, State Parks would attempt to get emergency deficit spending in current FY 1996/97.
Even under this scenario,State Parks estimates authorization would not occur until late in the
fiscal year and repairs still would not be complete until late 1997 or early 1998.
The Sanitation Districts'continued Involvement in this project Is initiated by our genuine concern
for the protection of the environment,as well as our belief that the environment should be
enjoyed by our citizens. By keeping the beach open and helping participate in a program that
will create future quality sewer service to the beach,we feel gratified that we are good public
citizens.
I thank you in advance for any assistance you can provide the State Parks and Recreation
Department in solving this dilemma and returning Boise Chica State Beach to full and safe
operation for the citizens of Orange County.
Very truly yours,
John Collins
Joint Chair
Boards of Directors
JC.jt
nwaooricnwnesorrso®e.�r
G1W-2o eo •eRI ,03 :ye UP.iUPIONEER BUSINESS CORPrU 73+OOII03666565 PRGB 01 3i9
uD�c
Honorable Curt Pringle
Page 3
September 6, 1996
A tast4rack design of the system followed by competitive public works Contract bidding and
construction will take a minimum of seven months to achieve a minlmally operational
replacement system and another 3-12 months to complete all construction- State Parkvhas
Indicated that they are pursuing two authorization scenorlos. The fast one would be for FY
97/98. Under this scenario,the Slate Indicates that the earliest it can potentially be authorized
to proceed with a contract with the Sanitation Districts s July 1, 1997. 7'hs implies that the
earliest a replacement system could be operating is the first quarter of 1998. Underasecond - -- -- -
Scenario,State Parks would attempt to get emergency deficit spending in Current FY 199M7.
Even under this scenario,State Parks estimates authorization would not occur until late In the
fiscal year and repairs still would not be complete unlit late 1997 or early 1998.
The Sanitation Districts continued invoNement in this project is initiated by our genulno concern
for the protection of the environment,as well as our belief that the environment should be
enjoyed by our citizens. By keeping the beach open and helping participate in a program that
will create future quality sewer service to the beach,we feel gratified that we are good public
citizens.
I thank you in advance for any essstance you can provide the State Parks and Recreadon
Department in solving this dilemma and returning Boise Chlea State Beach to full and safe
operation for the citizens of Orange County.
Verybulyyours,
r-h'C'O
rectors
JC-.jt
•vxoorran¢.mammei,
Key Participants:
Jack Roggenbuck,District Superintendent
Orange Coast District
State of California
Department of Parks and Recreation
3030 Avenida Del Presidente
San Clemente,CA 92672
Phone: 714-366-08529 - -
Donald H.Ito, Park Superintendent
Orange Coast District-North Sector
State of California
California Park Service
18331 Enterprise Lane
Huntington Beach,CA 92648
Phone:714-847-8661
Larry Honeybome
County Health Care Agency
2009 E.Edinger .
Santa Ana,CA 92705
714-667-3750
Steve Mayville
California Regional Water Quality Control Board
3737 Main Street
Suite 500
Riverside,CA 92501-3339
909-782-4130
Nancy Wheatley
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
PO Box 8127
Fountain Valley,CA 92728
714-962-2411 x 3500
Btu 14:3927 -> 714%203% aDriala Mclutym Page Eel
Mr 36-96 FRl 12:39 P. 01
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION of SANITATION AGENCIES
-+� Ct 926 LSVxSSuire 1490 ti..m nu,UA96814 TXID(916)446418b8-PAX(916)4484908
. w
❑ATE August 29. 1995
aOCIIASL P.arLLON
Rncaar.D'u W&
smm Lrn;=ma.e M.om TO: CASA Member Agencies
A RMrAL LARSON
a.rrnxP.zw,ms.vr°;n FROM: Mike Dillon & Bobbi !arson
SUBJECT. CONFERENCE COMMITTEE ON CONSTITUTION REVISION NOT
P.a<ianAt RECOMMENDING LOCAL CHARTERS
MoN L woeaRUPP
county sv Wu Dt•
d orm6a umty The Senate-Assembly Conference Committee on SCA 39 (Kiilea) has completed its
901 B,mA ru,er AV,rro -
o v.w93M6 review of the recommendations of the California Constitution Revision Commission
(T14)5°01 (CCRC) and has selected several proposals for inclusion in the proposed
uAs(n4) ` constitutional amendment. The requirement that each county establish a local
cHAfiL&&jpy"g Community Charter Commission will not be part of the package this year. CASA
Krone samruy a.,ne and other special district associations had opposed the CCRC's recommendation
Epp paNdm 56e°` that these commissions constitutionally
issi bmandated for several reasons:
N M w949fs
tass)mrar0w
lane vAHae„ • The composition of the local charter commissions was skewed in favor of
caenLorrs 70w SEND cities and counties, to the disadvantage of special districts anti school
Cumc�An+wutrwtra Dist districts.
PBO"1W , •The CCRC
n4m•v.w.,n.A4<xY proposal would have required the number of local governments
to be reduced by 10% without regard to whether the reduction would result in
DrRP�A>'L4Rc6 improved service or reduced costs.
JAl(ES a.Rawer
a,w sn�m •Significant state-mandated costs would be incurred by the local
s'•""`""a""`y governments to pay for the charter process.
dRFPRRj'G aAN8SN
The proposal takes development of procedures for reorganization and
6naw4mNecrPaARvaP boundaries of local governments out of the hand of L.AFCO.
Cmwlcmw Ce,L
s mwr nm a
RONALO R YOONO Under the latest version of SCA 39, the only local governmentprovisions included
am 1)to require the Governor and the Legislature to develop and adopt a
comprehensive realignment plan and 2) to add stronger "home rule" language, which
affects cities and counties. The recommendations included in SCA 39 are
xsre sAPmsrRrN summarized in an attachment to.this memorandum.
PMervr ID�,tmtv0 Aa.a<.�
ENBRco rs
118acann<ttYmt Are.,v.w. With Saturda}�s deadline for adjournment looming, it is still unclear whether the
W.0' 0 scaled-back constitutional amendment has the necessary support w,u,+n9�.�c.zw.w ry PPort to be placed an
fM)�-1» the supplemental ballot in November. In any case, none of the provisions currently
included in the measure have direct implications for CASA agendas.
88/38/96 14:49:53 -> 7149GMS6 Donald McIntyre Page 881
RUG-30-96 FRI 12:49 P. 01
CCRC Recommendations to Include in a 1996 SCA
1) Executive Branch:
a) Authorize the governor and lieutenant governor to run on
the same ticket; allow the governor to appoint the lieutenant
governor to an executive branch position.
b) Abolish the Board of Equalization and merge it with the
F'ranchise Tax Board; keep an elected appeals body. --- -
2) Legislature: Authorize six-month sessions with the remainder of
the year devoted to interim studies and oversight.
3) State Budget:
a) Require the governor to submit, and the Legislature to
adopt, long-term goals and performance measures in the
budget process.
b) Require adoption of a four-year state infrastructure plan.
c) Require the state budget to be balanced with a two percent
General Fund reserve-
d) Restrict external borrowing to finance a deficit
4) Schools:
a) Remove mention of the county superintendent of schools
and state board of education from the constitution.
b) Add languagc giving incrcascd local control to school boards
and local citizens (comparable to "home rule' language)-
5) State-Local Relations:
a) Require the governor to submit a comprehensive
realignment plan to the Legislature by January 1998.
b) Require the Legislature to adopt a comprehensive
realignment plan by July 1, 1998.
c) Add stranger "home rule"-language to the constitution.
August] 19% -
Guidelines for Public Agencies
Regarding Ballot Measures
September 1996
General Rule — Information, Not Advocacy
Public agencies may not spend money to support or oppose ballot measures placed
before the electorate. It is permissible, however,for public agencies to take a
position on a ballot measure and educate the public on the measure,its impacts and
the agency's position.
Information provided by a public agency must be accurate and balanced and
represent supporting as well as opposing views.
Permissible Activities
It is generally accepted that public agencies may take the following steps regarding a
ballot measure:
• Incur expenses to analyze a measure and its impacts.
• Adopt a formal position in support of or in opposition to a measure.
• Notify the public, media and others of the agency's position through news
releases, bulletins or other vehicles that are informational and balanced but
do not advocate a yes or no vote. .
• Prepare and distribute factual, balanced information on a ballot measure to
the public and other organizations. Material distributed should represent
both pro and con viewpoints in a fair manner.
• Respond to inquiries from the media, the public or other organizations on
the impact of a measure.
• Participate in forums or debates on a measure if all views are represented.
• Sponsor forums or debates on a measure if all views are represented. If only
one side is able to attend, agencies should be prepared to document that the
other side was invited.
• Agency staff and elected officials may meet with newspaper editors and other
groups to objectively explain a measure's impact on the agency.
• Elected officials may participate in forums or debates and advocate a position
if it is made clear that they are acting in a personal capacity and not at a
public agency's expense.
Prepared by the Association of California Water Agencies
910 K Street,Ste 250,Sacramento,CA 95814 916/441-4545
Prohibited Activities
Under state law, public agencies may not:
• Spend money to clearly advocate a yes or no vote on a ballot measure.
• Contribute to campaigns supporting or opposing a measure.
• Expend funds for printing, office supplies or staff time in support of or
opposition to a ballot measure.
Additional Guidelines
• Timing. To avoid the appearance of advocacy, public agencies should be
sensitive to the timing of mailings or other activities.Any items mailed in the
last two weeks before an election may raise a red flag.
• Intent. Agencies should be careful to avoid the impression that materials are
being sent to the public to advocate a yes or no vote. Any information piece,
when taken as a whole, must not appear to be an advocacy or "campaign"
piece.
• Full disclosure. Public agencies should ensure that any materials produced
provide a factual and complete representation of the ballot measure and its
impacts.
• Choosing a vehicle. While it is permissible to produce special publications or
materials, public agencies may wish to use existing newsletters or other
communications vehicles to educate the public about a ballot measure.
• Disclaimers. In addition to complying with all of the above guidelines,
public agencies may wish to include a disclaimer on any printed materials.
The disclaimer may state that the material is being provided for information
purposes only and is not meant to advocate a yes or no vote.
Consult Legal Counsel
Public agencies should consult their legal counsel for guidance on any activities
relating to ballot measures,particularly printed materials distributed to the public.
Prepared by the Association ofCahfomia Water Agenda
910 K Street,Stu 250,Sacrunento,CA 95814 916/441.4545
Voter Approval for Local Government Taxes.
218 Limitations on Fees, Assessments, and Charges.
Initiative Constitutional Amendment.
Argument in Favor of Proposition 218
VOTE YES ON PROPOSITION 218. IT WILL GIVE YOU TAXPAYERS HAVE NO RIGHT TO VOTE ON THESE
THE RIGHT TO VOTE ON TAX INCREASES! TAX INCREASES AND OTHERS LIKE THEM
Proposition 218 guarantees your right to vote on local tax UNLESS PROPOSITION 218 PASSES!
ineremes—even when they are called something else, like Proposition 218 will significantly tighten the kind of benefit
'assessments"cr'fees"and imposed on homeowners. assessments that cars be levied.
Proposition 218 guarantees your right to vote on =as Here are examples of why fees and assessments and other
imposed on your water,gas,electric,and telephone hills. nonvoted taxes are so unfair:
Proposition 218 does NOT prevent government from raising ' The poor pay the same assessments as the rich.An elderly
and spending money for vital services like police, fire and widow pays exactly the same on her modest home as a
education. If politicians want in raise taxes they need only tycoon a mammon.
convince local voters that new ta:••are really needed. ' There are now aver 6,000 local districts which eon impose
Proposition 218 simply extends the long standing tees and assessments without the tamest of nasal voters.
Special over
1te have increased cities
cr aver
constitutional protection an approval.
against politicians imposing tea 2408% over 16 years. Likewise, cities have increased
increases without voter approval. utility taxes 416%and raised benefit assessments 976%,e
After voters passed t allowsth m politicians erected a ten-ficid increase.
loophole ro the law that allows them to roue taxes without services
Non-voted taxes on electricity, gas, water, and telephone
voter approval by calling faxes tad, one
law and"teem services hit renters and homeowners hard.
Once this loophole was created," , one lawyer working with he And,retired homeowners get hit doubly herd!
politicians wrote, assessments "are now limited only by the To confirm the impact u fees and assessmentslist
f you,look at
limits of human imagination yoursed ri tax bill.You will see a growing list of assessments
How imaginative can the politicians be with assessments? =posad without voter approval.The list will grow even longer
Here are a few eaam les among thousands: tuiless R°poscnon 21g paves.
P n8 Proposition 218 will allow you and your neighborsalnot
• A view fax m Southern California—the the better the view of those who
pa Betide how high your dazes will be. y will allow
the Deem you have the mare you pay. Chose who pa assessments to decide H what they are being
• In Los Angeles,a proposal for assessments for a$2-million asked in pay for is worth the cast.
scoreboard and a $6-million equestrian center to be paid FOR THE RIGHT TO VOTE ON TAXES, VOTE YES ON
for by property owners. PROPOSITION 218.
• In Northern California, taxpayers 27 miles away from a JOEL FOR
park are assessed because their property supposedly Presiders Howard Jarols Tarpayen Aamelare.
benefits from that park. JIM CONRAN
• In the Central Valley, homeowners are assessed to Preeidmi,Censamera First
refurbish a college football field. RICHARD GANN
President,Ponl G.I.Citizens CammiHee
Rebuttal to Argument in Favor of Proposition 218
PROPOSITION 218 IS NO FALSE ALARM . . . IT HURTS CONSTITUTIONAL POWER SHIFT.
Propositions can deceive,an carefully judge who you believe. Proposition 218 etches this into the stare Constitution:
Beware of wild claims for new "constitutional rights"and Blocks 3 million Californians from voting on tax
people who pretend concern about widows and orphans. assessments.The struggling young couple renting a small
Read Proposition 218 yourself and see how large home,WILL RAVE NO V01'E on the assessments imposed
corporations, big landowners and foreign interests gain more on the house they rent.
voting power than YOU. Create special land interests more voting power than
Promoter say you got-tax reform" . . . you may actually .average homeowners.The "elderly widow"promoters cite
get serious cutbacks in local service and FEWER VOTING will be banned from voting if she is a router,or her voting
RIGHTS for millions of California citizem. power dwarfed by large property owners.
Sometimes we hear hysterical warnings about had things Gives nan-citizens voting rights on your community taxes.
that never occur . . . Proposition 218 is a REAL threat. On Proposition 218 is a great deal for wealthy special interests.
Proposition 218 consider the berm to EXISTING local services, But it's a bad deal for the average taxpayer, homeowner and
not vague future threats: renter.
• May reduce CURRENT funding for police, fire and HOWARD OWENS
emergency medical programs across California. Congress o(Cdi(ornia Seniors
• Worsens SCHOOL CROWDING by making public schools LOIS TINSON
pay NEW TARES,cutting classroom reaching. President, CaUfamia Teachers Associaifon
• Could eliminate Lifeline utility support for SENIORS and RON SNIDER
Pmiderv,California Aaaoeiatian of
disabled citizens. Highway Patrolmen
76 Arguments pneted an this page are the opinions of the authors and have not been checked for etewacy by my official agency. G96
Voter Approval for Local Government Taxes.
Limitations on Fees, Assessments, and Charges. F2 Q
Initiative Constitutional Amendment. O
Argument Against Proposition 218
PROPOSITION 218 DILUTES VOTING RIGHTS, HURTS Don't handcuff police and firefighters.The California Police
LOCAL SERVICES Chiefs Association, Fire Chiefs Association and California
In the disguise of tax reform,Proposition 218's Constitutional Professional Firefighters ask you w vote NO.
Amendment REDUCES YOUR VOTING POWER and gives The impartial Legislative Analyst's report shows how
huge votingg power to corporations, foreign interests sad Proposition 218 could impede Lifeline support for the elderly
waalthY Ind owners. and disabled. It prohibits seniors and disabled from receiving
It cute polite.fire.lib park,senior,and disabled services maded utility services unless they pay all meta themselves.
and diverts toads neededNr classroom-size reductions. Proposition 218 cuts more than $100 million from local
Read Proposition 218 carefully—it's a wolf,not a lamb! seryi.tts yet wasue tam of millions each year by changing the
YOU LOSE RIGHTS; CORPORATIONS, DEVELOPERS, Constitution to require 5,000 local elections even if local
NON-CITIZENS GAIN VOTING POWER citizens don't want an election . . . even if the election cost is
Section 4(e)of Preposition 218 changes the Constitution to more than the potential revenue.
gtvo corporations, wealthy landowners and developers MORE MAKES SCHOOL CROWDING WORSE
VOTING POWER THAN HOMEOWNERS.It lets laree outside
interests control community taxes—against the wiill of local California teachers oppose Proposition 218 became Section
citizens, Val imposes a new tax on public school property, diverting
EXAMPLE:An oil company owns 1000 acres,you own one mesons from classroom programs to pay for non-school
arts; the oil corporation gets 1000 times more voting power expGO8Ps.
then u_ California already has the most crowded classrooms in
While Prop. 218 gives voting power to outside interests, America (dead last of 50 states). Proposition 218 makes school
Section 4(g) denies voting rights W more than 3.000,000 mos'ding worse.
California renters. SHELL GAME
Reducing American citizens'Constitutional rights, it grants This measure takes a few good ideas,but twists and perverts
voting rights to corporations and abcentee landowners—even them. It nipples the best local services and puts more power
foreign citizen. into the hands of special interests and non-citizens.
EXAMPLE:A shopping center owned by a foreign citizen is Proposition 218 goes too far. Assessment laws DO need
worth 100 times as much as your home; that person gets 100 improvement,but Proposition 218 is the wrong way to do it It
times more voting power than you! does more harm than good, restricting our voting rights,
Every citizen should have the right to vote if a community is hurting schools,senior and public safety programs.
voting on local assessments for police, fire,emergency medical Please vote NO on Proposition 218.
and library Programs. It's unfair to ve voting power to
non-citizens, big landowners and developers, yet deny it to FRAN PACKARD
millions of Califb n . Pneid."I<agae of Women Voters ofCuBfbr
MAY CUT LOCAL POLICE,FIRE PROTECTION CHIEF RON LOWENBERG
Section 6(b)(5) eliminates vital funding sources for local Pn,ident,California Police Chiefs'Areociallon
police,ire,emergency medial and library services. CHIEF JEFF BOWMAN
Proposition 218 goes too far—ma forbid emergency Pnatden,California Fire Chiefi'Aasacietion
smanaments for earthquakes,foods and fires.
Rebuttal to Argument Against Proposition 218
Arguments against Proposition 218 are misleading and Under Proposition 218,officials must convince taxpayers that
designed to confuse voters.In truth: tax increases are justified. Politicians and special interest
1. Proposition 218 expands your voting rights. It groups don't like this idea. But they can't win by saying
CONSTITUTIONALLY GUARANTEES your right to vote attaa4meers to ers oulcon�a simd te on =ationso they use misleading
on tames. That question: DO YOU BELIEVE TAXPAYERS SHOULD
2. Under Proposition 218, only California registered voters, HAVE THE RIGHT TO VOTE ON TAXES? If you answered
including renters, can vote in test elections. Corporations yea'.VOTE YES ON PROPOSITION 218.
and foreigners get no new rights. Read the nonpartisan, independent SUMMARY by the
3. Current law already allows property owners, including Attorney General which beggiina "VOTbEy all memis cited R APPROVAL FOR
nonresidents, to all on property sssessments based on the �N'GOVERNMENT now.Then youll knowthe truth,3�us
assessment amount they pay. This is NOT created by property tax bill,due out now.Then you
FOR THE RIGHT TO VOTE ON TAXER, VOTE YES ON
Proposition rates
PROPOSITION 218!
4. Lifeline"rates for elderly sad disabled for telephone,
g ,a
sad electricre services a NOT affected. CAROL RO83,VANS
5. Proposition 218 allows voter approved Cases for police, fire, Vlee•Pretfden;California T Poyen Aaeoeiadon
education. FELICIAELEINSON
Proposition 218 simply gives taxpayers the right to vote on Past President.Council o(Sacra M.
taxes and stops politicians'end-rum around Proposition 13. Senior Organisations
That's why ordinary taxpayers, seniors, parents, LEE?HELPS
homeowners, renters, consumer advocates, support Founder,Alliance of C.Ujfhrata Taspnyen
Pmposition 218. and lnootoed Voters(ACTIV)
G96 Arguments printed an this page are the opinions of the authors and have not been checked for accuracy by any official agency. 77
composed as ifrhe turnover wssa u4dm final[0.yam. Sections. Allaadon ofrtwvur/am.^salted coeemmea.
(e) Then dull h impoW fin ewh meek less upon the weber inane of every esuu. Section 1W3 or the Rewnm od Tuedan Cam 4 graded to read
ML Of aprmon tint furl wars equal to the enhance Cenppnd utsdr abdivisian del fin an 15603. %I.) Ercepe w promises in rWdiwion to). he bJa.m of W rovers,in the
Individual having the swrc.of waded.,wom. Personal In.Tx Fad shall upon order of the Canmlkr,be dawn tlwafaho far tee
(0 Th w capered by Ws pan is m o seas random of acting refund, under ft pan in h transferred ro the Geaml Food.All
(1)(1)Seniors I B)of dos Imaval Rewme Cod.among ter cocain uwmed imvme of michwrd ufud wsa m,:hall be ndepwited Iv f Personal[.cons Tx Fad We
miner children wed as iltlu pant i iacwrs.shall apply ewcpI is ahawisa provided mdpr by tls Co stem..
(2)Section IISN711BM81(III often Internet Revenue Code.achtiog to income included on (b) (I) !AI Sabres no dart oAwddn required b,ubli a y vh IBA ve Overseas,I aI
pmcnt's muse h mdifred fee pwpowe of W,pm.by wbsuaeng"fire dollars mr for such/4ml woe then 4 header deposited in her Lain Agenq Fud fia i..AnVOw
"Win Y.Gw dallws 1S751"we"I pertrat"fin"IS Fret." rrkith 4 Farb,pm,d a he Gressel Finest Min udd4nnef amahu aJpenaul income has
(hl For east rxobk yew beginning an or after lenuuy I.1986.tlx Fawku The BmN owner.sqw is sul4ccrd Jar he knowned,preadoor tusbf,mar a,u areal,of the
shall rrorepwe the raceme tax bractns emrvhd in subdivitiom dal and (c).Thai ummdnnu to Swim/70e1 issue by the shown howni.e eddny Mq sabdrwsnn newe
..in=.shall be rode w folkwa: aanms in nsnenn eh rwo hishun plane!income der mna
111 The Cali'amia Depmmer of IodunnJ Reluior shall vaneWr aonuallY to the (8)Newvhwwinx mywbarpan+inn of law.mrsnmwv nsubngJ,he mtwrr
Frrmhiu Tu Bead dos pvrmege tluvge n dos CaliforJa Cawmv Prix Intlu err all Whatevera&I.,IA4 subdhatim in he actions,4....dominant pmdnt neWand by
iuw faro lam ofrh pdw derlVym to hum WMecmmt akdar yew.relam than Smim 8OfAr4dr XVl oJeh CWsJoraier Cmniwuan wed.gin pfrmmsinR w,we shag be
Aogm l of the ascent dedm ymr. fudedf muradius.in net arose,elder deposit ale.wasaaed b,rvbeagsuph MI
(2) De Faohiu T.Bond sbJ1 da bosh of dos fallowing: In me,vent shall ran sruasom inuradw adding this uadirkim areas in u level of ware
IAICampuu an I MGM Lee adjusmeofacer by adding I W .at as the peaeenwee rduraimulJnaw ,der 41ui ahun My dew!ofsme some.fodie,ahutx.w waurn
tlhoge filluse Over is farmers punuvv,to psnPaph(I)ad NNding the awls by 100. the anow,n/tlte,moon.
(B) Multiply th,preceding rouble yea income w twWom by me iMotim adjustment (2)la ao5 p.whl ran,h NO amowa uJ manwd the 4 kenaled n ch LsaW A,I
form derrWmd in eM1pmYapM1(A)ad round off Ne rruWng Padvers m the hhwt am F4su/generation Accoan,p✓nmry as paaeaph fit it Arab,ippapnred no the
dolor(SD. Canrmller Jar appnnionmm,amon8 all cmnda in he 1.1.Based upon inJnmrmrm
(1) (11 Farppwwppoow.ftJmm rh ten"CaefwJa adlumd gain iumner"iwlwer prorled br th Oepuamrm✓lpinme.ch Cachal4rshu11 malemappmianmenr on in
ads a the fiat nF whunn in waorduw,,e ab can propnnsm thin sh reel ammt of...argasmd m be
IAI Fin anY pan afth Lvdble sxa dorivg wMNw wapaYa wwaaddem of Wss�u .Aped Jvr,h pmr/iuW rmrJmm dl load u8em4r in th.anrvPwa nauh eg5eniau
fss B)For by Savors thenh N cumdi Wjw hi gm,cumin.rtghers nesown. .11
ad he,,bran rn eh sera[amowe mq✓snd ao nt,hpas for M,prior Jual rear ve✓
(BI For uY Pint ss the umber year I= watch on wpayer was rot o mident Its this primps home ante Ma red far chr Par l ogeainee M.state sorp✓rpom idierta Maneuver
sae.alYdteee items of adjacent home wkdswaetldwtl from sauw various this ancom feerft aarsMmamroehpaa he s......Mr.caMln sbllnducr Me road
sou.rkmmiod to orwdevm with Ouwr II lammendo8 wish Smash r reservoirs
.. u Harvard
mvn he,con. .araU 1.W w esew 35 a amu bm1 rural umam of
eD Ran pin any of rompwng"Call mina adjmd code incase"rode paragraph 1 d arwnue ullwoud re abbe,rhn0 purrmro Ice bnien JS uJAnide rwa vase,Cull aid(
she smouwofany 0opmenelm terminal in antusest year dung der pan of"ad .'a".I..haddwll✓4e adorethe,adf so n/sAp mxnwse..p l allloaw!
the A) The,was nos o rehMo of reds are ehvl the
houses o a e sum of W fallowing: .we in Mo nee.wa Me soh[✓hmnt/meat aerated in de aha panums In.,hit
,hit
(AI The smounttraid of the loss wtnbutable to she pm of W inset year in which Me same st hall be de pmted it,EwA nature omuw,meirov by a rmnn panums o M e
wpaye win a rtddeu anise hall an .Fa,loed br o whsrah hhzs n'm Provided in Smion J0.aJ seer
IB LTheI$wwbwdd Me lmwMJLdoing thpanndshuaabkyeushe weaver isms FW onew 1ww I,need I.rpwen nJM4uddie G. "load CauT'Aw,h same maninxu
aide,is dmiWuek h Califomid uwwh iwame ends hWnious ellowaeer in wnvin8 w thus rear mho is whin Se.pw JIXfo rs,,San Go Crld o Cud,.
adjusted!IIm tea ma dal La Orin,corm nJ your people fors,Smr of C.No a in rnmcsnx ed upon only)an
!l1e b re i,it nJMep ry nofrtivShore of CWifomn in names the uhrndmrmro vote ahurcprnmwl inwhmeruaennu.d<nwesfroahweontrun'b natemly,h
I..I.haGhvrhnmmon initiative Ourvo art rowan✓.cold marsnor very Arthuriwume wppayea✓,h,may
flowes,lerstowndinrbelww brnnyaieNbe
incoor a IM or that../ear .nowerwryhighen inmmm cupa3xnr 0 bedJd arArn4r 0iekw teard.1 ohm tervrsmeifurWnB buNm.aM thrrtbrullw,hnrr uR,m4r
sapin4/fap4 noNrr srRmerau cAwe mxme+twcunwnlapravldea Avsc luelafgW hoStudos. Theulpsrbdererv4xs.
alumaraftwSwar of CaAenwriawowa/ulll[iuwher , her saa.I�4Mesnrow.a, Studios. The legifktwe meY Furl 1h16 mash.oely by]lmwl<.pwfM in acM1
prop4 lMe Stine of Culi/emw tAw anyfuart enactmrw,,bar Wsen the are.6w.,der Mssu of the legislasuu byaaolgisds von.Ws4 amismswiN xdfoMr,dos puaosw
buNm rJM,rmeprno,W imamwu4urmoinroin,hu lewlandpmponiorwu.Aare a/ of it Iofr Nowem.d urhe waited of amreeawayofmrds house
Of
a&,t timed Jam car A7da/carom m+aue pmwided Jarb7 rh Humors nir4sive Secvav d al Nis mssm wide she approrJ of only a tm)ItnrY of eoch hoax of the
aM'nR the rnbG'v4nn. legislmve.
Proposition 218:Teat of Proposed Law
This initiative menus is submitted a the people in'ererdada with the orspecial tam.Speaidpurpnre,derma or agencies.amount,school dsnr4u,shall how
Ira dArtiele II,Serie.8 of the Conservation.seiation. mpawrr an lm rearal hose.
nitiative demure expressly amends the Constitution by adding artidn fir? Nn 4calsmemnmumnimpoa m.n4 ar inrarue ms Henralwmlm od mail
thence;thesefare,new proeisiau paphaed u be added are printd in 4o/ia type aAuw asulawasedsorhe Jecer.ad.,watedbru ma/nnn sw.A gm,.1 oushu/low
te indicate that they on new. be Owned as hurt have ncreasedaria 4 imponda,a war we lu'ghn rim rh ohsanuor ear
PROPOSED ADDITION OF ARTICLE XID C Orapprowd The denine"and hY M4 swaivir.chuff be maaWaud in a ngunrlr
AND ARTICLE XIII D uAeduled 6mral rIrcnaa fee members of,A,gvivaing bode nJMe twat trove o.
incept In curs,y'seargmr declared bra umn1..mar nfah,g awwn,,bad,..
RIGHT TO VOTE ON TAXES ACT (dAn,Senator eu iepowd seeded as wavard written,serad rvwd4 by mr 1.1
SECTION I. T Then an"I be news ad be cisa as Me"Right to Va, govrenmry we ns after/man 1.1995.and Pa.,,.,&dencene dour 4hav artrde.+hull
m Term Ace" mry gm whereas in br imparal We i)rapprowd by a majubr rear 4the savers rang in an a/aim
SECTION 2. FINDINGS AND DECLARATIONS. The le of th Sute of maw 4sw fulassepnstlm,wArN e4Nm.hu8 he held with.nvo lean nJMe eye..
CaefasJe find and declare,elm dPwP din,uJtks article and in romplsamr with subdivision III
h,ueY ProgniWv l3 eau inudd a Rorrdee8ectiww (d)Nolad,Rawmmehhurdwtear.mad w4.naarmverecnfruwleuatdumd
celi,f and a r,q.ia wren.pleaded of an I..,.Nowemr,local gowmmevrt be . Maw,4 subJd(rd,o the e4ro weer adappawdb)'.evoeitbtlr.nee A several w chuff
subjected wpaym to excessive the,ssuumaL far and charge increases that nos Italy mebrd,.d,n hex bee rmnwN iJass wanted at a sear me high,haware miumwa
hucrate the putpo,u ns sup of va eroal for anroeessd.but also Water the ecmomic roe so approaE.
secunryofall CaOfmmins and Ne Cabfwnis carom,used.This mama pa.rupayen SEC. J. Inchon, Pon,, Jar Leal Tue,. Arersmeara Fee and Charge,.
by theater the meWds by which Irtd govvwmnu am seams hem tupayee witlwut Nwwith ca dinR aar weer pav4am of sbit Conceited..imadfi. ,bin,w,limited ro.
sties,canes. Sewoa 8od9/Arsine Achr nunent awarsAWl mr br prodinedor whervtrr lihuN
SECTION 3. VOTER APPROVAL FOR LOCAL TAX LEVIES. Article Xlll C is n marten Of reducing as m ling one k a."""ummt fee er course are penew of
added to f California Cowin tion In tad: snu4dex 1.ogee Intl are.damn;,..fen ad durge ehJl be applicaale era all dual
AR77CLE)ON C gowmmechsuse a an"the L.'ara n,,tor ant low/fowmment.damnebllamperes,a
SECTION 1. L4prMsau As wed in seat aedan. tgRsavar threaten,higewasanrAu nperfimbfe sa nuvasd,noway crown..
fad "Gm,altu'mroumTru impwedJar seam[grovrtmtesea/puspnm. SECTIONS. ASSESSMENTAND PROPERTY RELATED FEE REFORM.
IN Article msua aq cowry.care cny wit rouncc iwbdinqu droner sin Article)GO D is added to fh Colifum4Cowtiadan to rod
rcmtyr dart sprnol dimia,armrmhr soul der n8irma/gowmmrnhl,win.
a fit 'Spr.io/dsmue"mtwu ra a,'goath run""Pa,Punaam ro'.ma few or a ARTICLE Sail D
8peddaa forrAevas imudiamee,nowwaromat sirloin!
anau.ihbens., SECTION I. Apral,acart NomMnmat, ..jho,,, inm✓Jnmshrpmv4iu ,,.
grereace baundanu iulding,bvs rvu fisebed ta,rMaW G'nnn+and ndrvdnpmme Mu ankle shall opphi ar elf wmrmnu/ra and adrxes, nhh er kk awApmmm�l m
aBmdn din,aroma.m tile[gnwsrmene Manes awhunn.Naming n sN)un41r wAnidr Xlll C
(it)re tpur ,oi mach anY w s was ad Jw edfunspmefwre,arc/Wing o and amaa ed +ell Phase, a ea;
far EC,Z pLevele.ab4h 4 r I.L nun d(Vowed funs, (o) Paver✓nr.,howhnmv as um,een.r td(mast d(h.aanrea Jre. nine o
SEC 2 Level Gu.tmmmr I.(imirorim NnwithnalinR mT mherpmrisnnu th4 (al re evriefee lawn/w4 rn,hi
Cmnimia. J prepem derr/rymm4. g mpo,irinn n/lee or chugn u u aondinm o/
III All lees npmeby any Intel Rawamreashull lr Memsd an beeuirr,....Isom fc)Vern e4n/ng have rbsinR ro let imp✓r4/m fandr,rob arms
108 G96
SEC. 2, afinieWx. Ar rood m d.moil" mn be ienpaard mrrlie uppmvre M✓m✓-M m,r em nJW Wnrnnte in Me dinnn m
lal "ANM "Mmx one local Ronromeu at define in+ohdivuim fbl f Swim/M addition ra Miru WpnnN by Wpn ,moomnumpninik rWA'Wionfw
Ametr Xlll C SEC. S. Efl trod Ooa. Puvmx m cobdnirton lal MSarinn 10 MAnidr/l.the
Ibl "Anrumrni meow am UvrwrMom urym m/pmmr!rinmaRmn'l ra mmia/ pmrinm MlAn,nrclr+MY beromr r�nirr ell doe eher Mr e4nWn unlru nraerMine
Mnr/b conferred upon he real p.,rit "Asdnmm,"include,,but U rear limited m. prmidrd.Br,wo,IWJ 1.1997..11 enaelpg,term or in[nmed wmrme Mail rwy(
",mend avn omo. "Dmefir mnm mrx+ame. mainremnn 1"a '"pedal rieA ells unity.bhow"'aNin,"jamda t,rM fill wlnq av nrmenn.+icon,m the
mrramm,roc. effe riv dose of Mu oracle cW be wdmpfinew rM pm'Num oM appmwl potion ter
Jet 'Corindmn"mmuWcM•/ocquuirim.iuealWrim mMrvxW.rtrancrmbn forth,an Smim J:
monument Ma pemom "wili[impmvrmem br m agency. fah Mr muarmu wywN r+dwiny r✓flwr[e Me mpiml[wu✓rmwemue am
wldl "pinndr"mmx m om dercmmrd by w aRenn ro rovain d/re wAnb wilt •prmcron eWexul•+Wew/M.nma rmrrt.mew flood room(amount,meem or
mnwa ryenalbmr/ulmmapmpwedpublic impmnmrm urpmpermnMN,ruin. rotor round Saturation''inure to inch wnamenn mall&nbdm ro rM pm[Nurm
(q Fn"nr"cMBi mrwumi Uy.Neem,or am.rulam aroc mender of mate I urn no in Section J.
mmecup..impdN b.un agency char ,faparrupmepenmmea imiGm•Jpmprm. Wpm. P. /e
naip. iuman Rau+rrJeewinamu a pmprmnwndforte. mo Mtmrcamhe cmucmr.at, wopnieian aRn1.Imma+r+oeu,Mmi,gall of 14
(a -Main.foci. aNWrmim mpeuen,mm.a ell rote of me,repair, it no,arde a. ,mInro'he aneameu ai rbe rime ode 'he P—e U imuWHY=mode P "Sabatini.
u upon,
am r pomc r .,Pouruertm,mee,and roprnirinn mrxnx ra pmpen�• axmnd in+wh uurammu cAWI M rubkn en rM pm[N,m xW appotrn/prvicen m
o (NJ 'a mar.inaprnmmralpbe dommpronmmu knhan, as J.
IRl a mpam,Maine.,rob MdnmdmimWderge.. Mm/pmpem MMrrt Iw AnS muumem the pm[rcdd if whichma art eulmirrp need m rcparm law
emwnart die ih liable rn pnrW amcorreu(n,wrMBe in yueaim. CiammumuJMirhrMJuiWu ro pnrwwld nolmrsMC✓nrmn lmpimms[Wu,eMW
fm "Pmymehip. ud nrvin'metro a public nrvin bring a dirt,re/eeinuhip m [mnieAW MMr Um,which
po
p W "ewml bear air An mcenmenr which from i f it. mejenrr mrrr Wpmml/mot sM mum
fit 'Special if un f min a panimeel,r uN.nano brook,note we above paednf voting in an r4nim m ell Udla M rM aaeamrnr. Subnqurnr armor in 4.
bdeeelu,dmlemdmnalantedrt hated inW dst cialrn MrpvblUUWBr.Wmml Melancholia., inoba Sienna
d
mAmamex nonimmrt T.11. AImumroe..Few,
Charles SEC Q PmprrrY ErWM fro aN CMTer. (al Pmndurci/or Ntwminreemrd
SEC. i FF pem Tmw. he.,.,it
fro aS, CMBn firmed., foul mo rot, fit and Choler. ,afnsro rdlt hallow sM pm[Non+punwu ch rain nmMn is
W7 my,hhe,teron.. rAWIMearallormY ue.p: wY paminJpmpom'•u eatfienR terfommURailed or dacBemdefine punuane an MU ani[le,achdag,bx
up on my pemnumimidmro/preprm munhy ruxW: wfit rn.rMfo/bwnK
l/I TM ndnemm pmprutt. 1himsrat Pa roAnile Eil 4.fActvac XX111 fll /Ms,of be pm wbhAahe mall",ii pnrpmNhd inameeanhANMr thulle
(B)Anrrp wouas rrcrided y Mu conic rote punmxmSwMnJMAnide ElllA The amotm a be cir or Prortr pm . ra M imputed open each ft, rl+all be
fdl Fees oruwapmvWNco-mend je am exceed BM chall opmadde were[ii mbr radial eerpmpr.N/e w[hareca
( ica jaa Mm,lorpmpem mxN,rrvimmpmiGd by rM toddle. ell roue owner Memaidex Npamel upm which Me/m nrrM.BdUpxpo,N far
(blforpocprar MehU anlle/eion pmvufwrJWmnml ur 8mnnicuAall rear wichA. the amnwoopmiturarAemrpmpoadm Mimpud.Wmeaomfo M,Uupm
M drcmNcwmunrlwd end Remanlmiew alpmprrrcnnrn(a) MWidhW am✓meMthe pnWa+N/rdthemoormacaiMckwor ell"aeon Jar rer/xor
SEC. J. Pmrrdum aNBnntidma/all Mande nick will
fahe.aarmY which cam.mgnhv wirA the dme.ewe•adW[axm Mapublie hmnnRmWpmpotedJrcw
peopan+loUrr'he wndnoun which
Wmeh�Wlpamewl be willMrrucpoinu MnaPo l (2)
mnjernd open,hem and upon whir.m w+ndmrnr will M impend.7/u prop✓mmme 1]1 IDr ogemy rMll<oNun a public Frannr upon rM Pnpurd(n n.rMBe nw lee
dprcial brnek derived by m[h idemilrN pvml rAdl M darminrd in rt/oMndAip rn roe sMn JS NY+MUr mNWR rM rode n/rM pmpurdl r v cMTe m rM roue owmn M
of.public
me,uJi nmxrAr maiummnc,home nmoca.No heading. ehe iiiMoponwhica Wd/rr nrcMReUph,Ponaamfice or ow.
publrc
...public impmmm�e or rM me, 1 which .,,&miumd the rim MMR pmart 4 No heading.opiu mq rMN warder or pmr+u maour rM potxued/rc✓r,fimm re of e
mamunc mall bo enefilminon .ten eof Pared word.ondrdr the reef,.a err nJ the pmaa eRaiuc ah .,bocNlu w unno wr pm or tea Die u mlonry Mermen of Me
pmpanioem ,MidI benpie mMeNeu an Wmfi.l.Onfp,pmial MnMm un mrraable. WexefirdppmU.eM1e ugm�dMll rem impnn Wrhe or ulrrBr.
aNm aannn ounhou.panrrrAeanerm/bea,aJ therpenal Mn�u[m/rmdma (i R k examated for Eaang, omufIncnm..Fed aN Ct. l fad ourfMBe
MnNPam4wi,mall one her
nwudormmmi mrawu}eM Axe MCWvian, "meM McNed impocN orinmarcdbvmrogmnwlea iemnuWl Meae/ollawinq
eMUMNAxr+nta/IrorMuat Au ardramnrxdraWnjitet nndemusnrr Ieq(1)
bydlmraN nmvin[inq rvidrmdrAx rhmep✓bfi[Iv ewnrdpomUinJan'renirrmryrria/ 1/1porr ete+urd comm. elljrc nrdMmcMUroeenmd rMkNr ngarmdwpmaid
bmrke the2)R,, remadwelfrc.
fbl All araamma,MEMnpfed kvbradrmifrCoMmni+rtpun pnpaM bra (L,whakh+drmnrcomic krmrMmdMllnm MmeeJnr mY pugnn man Man
rteJteredpmJednoml mBWer nnfN by the Aare of CWiJonm, rM(/o.wAica shehrwMam wen irrywdN
Jet la amame Mlle pmW+Nauu+mru/wearh rem it pomr+Mll Mr imputed fdl TMnmwx me
emonow A'co roml /a mroc, mmimWeuM
arWWmood ownero/m,Apone/rhaflMBlnreemn.nxfadbymull wo cpmpxre pmpem nwnerMip dMIIw rAmdrM peWnema ma of rM noted MrWwablero Me
,a,& r.rM rwafomr ptAerem domain. rhW entire doma.W✓ ,oh, Trouble paml.
1aduh,ho lfquen YWrpae deumim ulnopaYmmu.rM namekrmermrarere lei Nohroff rMrRr may MhWmNJwa,roars uagaumm.4 cour cln 'chan mrmNo'.
and Mo dmU upm wN[h ell ammne Mehe pmpo+ed eta+mvncwmUuWrN,regrew, wimmrW'aulramibDl�rc rM mrmrMMe pmprmagteNan frm urcMTrd bxNm
wish rod dx<.rime unelumnm Mapublic MUUH analpmpuNaueamu Each nrvin pormrial or ortimnso Mermdnare rorpdmWl S....nu .and all..be .,,a
+MEapletion.ol nupiduom pam ofamJu anmmur McAeproa in monflauh.W.
mcMrgn or mnmm�u.iM1allMclm+fodmo,ddddmdnu oN rMll nx MimpnrN
rM including
a di prom,and�abu....of am Mlber /.ma prep tr in nbdiafm Ido willow roc t inch will Aaim i.
dnludinga di,wprrern+emrmem rMr Mr wuten.,hoping espmrn.mddinNm U1NoJnar[MnermbimompmN/Reurn.area eaw..se wlulabill but not
,u id) Each
frA will mule in ell neramu roe being impmN 1wnN eo.paltin mica ambrewMe ore mat demo..worn W+enow U,vaWWe ra W
N) Emhmri ifmailed nawnenejidmcibm"'he agniy',t"morfor ponmm to ReblUx km inubaan mlYWmmmawra,a Ut amInammmn.
ed
bulk,
frNMEmama a d.lbr-hkheema Wa,ma the ter iaNwnerm map'icte Me Relnumb. mbraninctu�red ampmlam,a[IWi it Mtn.r ,whehem fee aociparit
balm mnt.manamobv mYewmrr reni Me un rook,wMrtbr the
upprear indicate o mxmay be muieaurl "my mee factor indnacer,fr whether In onerlgMBeir
a Mr mmr.nmmumma Wmdfirxem nl Me panel and eU or MruppM ru Wpwuan ra imp g the radio Ma fee- mrl,,.An borprgww be im dar �en one UBW mrinn
W pmpoud mrurmeu. muming We a.lWr'rr Make yr cMrgd.ell MNrn cAvE M mW ogmq to 4moMmn
fdl after
madiWl roNvna pofM Marut oWa erom i in Nana!mmen of Man dwWMme wW rM anicU.
iJ dour,her martin,the florin,1 Me pmpond mnumrm m rtcoe ownm o/each Iti Win AWmml hoc N.w bo/tion c rd es. and ,,, n E.rpckr Jm w[Mire
Notified panel M eAd public M1mnng.roe agent ml ev remidn off promo aRaiM rhe Jor memo.nun and rMw..olleuian,dream,ro pmpem re1xN n w rAerBe Nod M
potpwrd meumm and rabuwe rM bulbu.The aAmO cMY aw wpme m auamtenr iJ impend m innfolu j wler+ae omil rMr/rc ter charcgge U l-oh fic , aWmrrd i n,
Wenearound an
ptiaa Ann,ahee�p..coca/upon W.noupulo/sM Marine, malonnaweMWpmpmdarteu orapmprm rvbjea rerAein or cMTdecw Ill
Where 1. enppNWh ro Mrmda. ball.. .rAe ballaughted ,.oW,. Me WrrmnJrllhe bw conducted
min i.awe 4S Mhe rlemmM*pubb,inW,.A.d8m.Thr
murmmr. In ,new o1lig he Mlam rAe. !pin rMfl M miBArcd oaoein8 ro Me Mt
mill M mudmlN rear I, ran JJ m,i aker sM public Meson.An agmn oral
pmponiaml legal .conti n e,ouoJ/mNpmpem. adage pmcNuru+WUWI ro rAou Jw rnammu in aurumur N Me reMun Melewim+
fkln mY 4galaaimawwenBnme,m nMmvaar am" WbwM WrrMmlM man eBeivbn WJuly
tre, ro IemMmr rAx W potpdm✓Me tmbliir w 9mem rtwivr e r beenfl,fmi, Idl Beginning July 1.1997.affhu ur rMTxmMll amply ndM hit union.
oweand aMnellbreeku[m/dmdoa and
Imaour on. aNrMrrocamrrml MunY.
Prime mi mamenr U pmponimd roe aN ao Pnxer Mx W Mufiu rnrekrnd m ell SERION J. IA9EEAL IN am piU an of Theloclprovisions of INc uc atoll nd
pmpem rca pw may i a W bwane eml ncin ronawN to Wlanmm iu paryous al limiting local gommmem rtnvue and
181 nemwr may area a Mw(m an mew or be demon curer nh t ell Co.,..,. who ere.ECn N 6. rovuee
do rear men pmpem wieAa W dYdnn WY roe M/nmd uerr rAv Cuan ro have SECTION b. SEVEEAaaamml ai mY in of Mc uu or pm rMmL is lot and
Men deprived^I W nRM m mee/ter of ill"acrnr. Ile corn dMerminec . ail ,roam MN t fa i-mLid 1.a mromt.W to rM anNoPumping mmen shall rot M Wetted.bah
ComuurNn oJehr Unbend Seun armor,/rddnl Ww myWm wMmue W mnr,mx Yuen ,lull mroiv in fall fors aN eEm.aN Iv Mrs rod No pmnriom W ells xt m uvxrble. ,
G96 109
.... ....... _ ___
SEP 11 '96 15:59 FR PIU I cruwv MRDISON 619 236 1995 M le P.02
uN arvlov eT
PILLSBURY MADISON SI SUTRO LLP '
Lae nueaee sulT lSao Mww an05
NCN TOalf 0"Nad mu,
snCan,ICNTo 101 W ST 9NO .y sµ OI..
n ra.Mclmeo SAN OICOO. C IFORNIA 92101"e219 uN low
NneMIMOTON. OC MONO eoNO
roeTO TCLCeMONE ISM ZY S000
v�CmlMit6 CSIB) 206•I0a5
NPITEa'm OrrICC nMo
olocm euL Nuue[a '
(619) 544-3177
September 11, 1996
VIA FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION
TO: ORANGE COUNTY INVESTMENT POOL
PARTICIPANTS' DISTRIBUTION LIST
Re: In Re County of Orange
Case No. 94-22272JR
Dear Pool Participants:
We continue to monitor the status of various post-
confirmation issues in the County's bankruptcy case.
with regard to the clams objection process, the County has
focused its initial efforts on routine types of objections, for
example, claims filed after the bar date, claims with
insufficient documentation and claims filed in a blank amount_
The County has filed ten "omnibus" objections and expects to
file several more omnibus objections in the next several weeks
to deal with these routine types of objections_ Following that
process, the County will focus on other individual, substantive
claims objections.
In addition to the County's adversary proceeding against
Merrill Lynch, the County has filed six other actions against
third parties. Merrill Lynch and several of these defendants
filed motions seeking withdrawal of these actions from the
Bankruptcy Court to the United States District Court. The
District Court took these motions under submission on Monday of
this week and we expect a ruling within the next two weeks. An
October 4, 1996 hearing is scheduled in the Bankruptcy Court on
the motions to dismiss filed by several of the third party
defendants_
Pursuant to a court ordered joint discovery plan, the
County will resume initial written discovery and depositions in
the Merrill Lynch case after September 23, 1996. Defendants in
other third party cases will be allowed limited participation in
the depositions. After several months, the discovery will
become more open to the non-Merrill Lynch defendants.
�msxow
SEP 11 '96 15:59 FR PILLSBURY MADISON 619 236 1995 TO 1S P.e3
Mr. Stan o£telie
September 11, 1996
Page 2
we will continue to monitor the status of these various
matters and will periodically provide you with status reports.
If you have any questions, please call me.
Sincer ours,
C. .
Shea
cc: Official Investment Pool Participants
committee and Counsel
209voaa
rck TOTAL PAGE.93 xa
SEP 18 '96 16:18 FR PILLS&W I=IS01 619 236 1995 10 18 P,82
7-o.+TE . F`[s'.
DOO -
1AW
PILLSBURY MADISON 6 SUTRO LLP
LOF M,OFL[g Wy Moo MdIO nM1F
NLW . OMN06 OWNT
sPCwwwC 101 MEET aR011OWAY awa O�000 A..
SAN 019GO� CALIFORNIA 9E101-aale anN JO36 MOTON. OO MONO FO„O
TOFw tLFCPNONL IGWI ilMlA00
IMg�M1LC (6101 no-logs
WWII" OPnC6.0
aIP LOI O L NVMYCP
(619) � 544-3177
September 18, 1996
VIA FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION
TO: ORANGE COUNTY INVESTMENT POOL .._.___...__
OPTION A PARTICIPANTS' DISTRIBUTION LIST
Re: In Re County of Orance
case No. 94-22272JR
Dear Option A Pool Participants: _
The legislation promoted by the Option B Pool Participants
ISE 2169) , which arguably would have enhanced the litigation
posture of Option B claims against the County and third parties,
was not signed by the Governor. Herewith is a copy of the
Governor's statement regarding SB 2169.
S1ry�gD ely yours,
Patrick C.S ea
cc: Official Investment Pool Participants
Committee and Counsel
1g99ssFF
SP 18 '96 16:11 FR PILLSBURY MADISON 619 236 1995 TO 16 P.03
GOVERNORS OFFICE
Supt.. 1 7 Roo
To the Mmhas of the CaGfotma Senate;
I am ramming Senate Bill No. 2169 without my sipatur .
This bin would nuke it declarative of eassting law that funds deposited into a county
treasury shall be held in trust when lawfully deposited by a public amity located in a jurisdiction —---.-.
outside ofthe county. This bill would also make other technical c.hrages to adtting law.
In 1995,after the detdaration of bankruptcy by Orange Cbunty,the Official Invrsstarent
Pool Participants Committee, and most of the jurisdictions within the county agreed on a recovery
plan. Last year, a series of bills were enacted to assist Orange County with is efforts to reach a
settlement agreemern with its creditors. Uoweva, "Option B"jurisdimons, made up primarily of
local agencies outside the county that deposited funds in the Orattge County investment pool,
decided not to b==e signatories to the settlement agreement. By not signing the agreement,
Option B jurisdetions have retained the right to take independent legal action against third
parties. Tbasejurisdicrions are currently involved in Engation ova appropriate oompeoai,_m' for
their losses
It is inappropriate to consider this legislation urml the litigation is resolved.
Cordially,
PETS VMSON
GOVERNOR PE Me WTL ON - STATE CAe OL . S,.CR ME . Cwuso A 95814
" TOTFL PAGE.03 +�
sfO bT++� UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Criminal Investigation Division
o 75 Hawthorne Street C-1
San Francisco, CA 941 0 5-3901
March 26, 1996
Mahin Talebi, Source Control Manager
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
10844 Ellis Ave.
Fountain Valley, CA 92728
Dear Ms . Talebi,
As you may know, the United States has just concluded the
criminal prosecution of Venus Laboratories of Huntington Beach,
CA for violations of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act. In
this case, Venus pleaded guilty of charges that they knowingly
discharged pollutants into the publicly owned treatment works of
the Orange County Sanitation Districts in violation of federal
pretreatment standards. The investigation was the product of
your staff and other members of the Orange County Environmental
Crimes Task Force.
What is significant about this case is not only is this the
second criminal conviction against this company, but it is an
example of the high degree of cooperation that has evolved in the
area of environmental law enforcement in California. No single
agency, has the staff needed to detect, investigate, and
prosecute all instances of intentional pollution. But through
task. force operations and joint investigations such as the Venus
case, highly complex and resource intensive investigations can
succeed.
The success of the Venus case was due in large part to the
work of your staff of investigators. Their efforts at
inspection, sample collection, equipment calibration and
deployment, supplied the critical physical evidence that
supported the violations. I realize that this was a substantial
committment on your part and I wanted to recognize the
involvement of the following members of your staff:
Deon Carrico
Arnold Chavez
James Davidson
David Engstrom
Darrell Ennis
Tim Foley
Tom Gaworski
Mike Masterson
Mike Reideler
Merrill Seiler
2
I would particularly like to recognize the leadership of
Project Supervisor Kelly Christensen. Mr. Christensen served as
the focal point within your agency for the investigative efforts
of EPA, California EPA, and the Orange County District Attorney.
His direction of your staff brought together all their efforts to
a successful prosecution.
Please accept my appreciation and that of the United States
Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Criminal Enforcement,
Forensics and Training for a job well done. And please extend
our gratitude to your staff. I have prepared Certificate of
Appreciation for each staff member which Resident Agent-in-Charge
Mike Konyu can deliver personally. Mr. Konyu will be in contact
with your staff to arrange the appropriate presentation. Mr.
Konyu can be contacted at 818-583-7528.
Once again, thank you very much for your efforts and for
your spirit of cooperation.
Sincerely,
��J//�
David W. Wilma
Special Agent-in-Charge
cc: RAC Mike Konyu
Case file 0901.0029
September 18, 1996
MEMORANDUM
TO: Nancy I Wheatley
Director of Technical Services
FROM: Kelly Christensen
Source Control Supervisor
THROUGH: MahinTalebi—,W7
Source Control Manager
SUBJECT: U.S. EPA Award
The U.S. EPA sent a letter of recognition on March 26. 1996, to the Districts' Source
Control staff who contributed to the Venus Labs case in 1994. As you recall, the
Districts was asked by the California Department of Health Services to provide
monitoring and inspection in support of the existing case. Districts' inspectors produced
evidence of illegal sewer disposal in the case against Venus Labs. The case continues
to be litigated.
Mr. David W. Wilma, a U.S. EPA Special Agent-in-Charge, has expressed an interest
in presenting a certificate of appreciation to the inspectors involved. He is prepared to
make the presentation at the Districts' Board of Directors meeting on September 25,
1996. Government budget restraints delayed their ability to make the presentation until
now.
This memo serves as a request to add this presentation to the agenda for the
September 25th Board of Directors meeting. This could be part of the General
Manager's Report. A letter with further information is attached.
MT:Ivw
JAWP35BBLLAUME PABRDNW
Attachment (MAmh 2B,1BBB letter)
CSDOC 0 P.O.Box 8127 0 Feenteln Valley,CA 82728-8127 0 (714)882-2411
Executive Summary (coned)
Fact Book(cont'd)
The Fad Books contain information on all 31 cities,dozens of special districts within Orange
County,and more than 28 County agencies and departments. The County volume contains
budget data,salary and position counts,specific state or federal mandates associated with
program operations,and program sources of revenue for the past two fiscal years.
Phase 11 Outreach
The second part of the GPOCs work is highlighted in this Report(pages 27 to 64),showing
the comments of a varied group of individuals associated with local government—what
GPOC calls"stakeholders." The groups interviewed or polled include County employees,
local government managers,"customers" of services,the general public,and vendors who
contract with County government.
Findings and Recommendations
The net result of the workplan,the development of Findings and Recommendations relating
to governance within and around the County of Orange,is cited in Part Nine of the Report
We've highlighted selected Findings and Recommendations on the next page. Readers will
find the detailed descriptions of the Findings and Recommendations on pages 73 to 102.
In short,the GPOC recommendations ask the County to:
•Focus more on long-term strategic planning.
•Accurately and clearly account for program costs to ensure fair bidding.
•Get out of specific"businesses."
•Competitively bid almost all of its"marketplace" services,with
encouragement offered to current employees to respond to the bids.
•Give cities a greater voice in regional service delivery.
•"Stop studying" and"start doing."
Implementation
The Report includes an action plan and timeline for implementing the suggested changes
outlined in the Findings and Recommendations section(page 103). This part of the Report
suggests who should take.the initial actions and when the initial actions aright bring the
GPOCs work to fruition.
How to Find Out More
On page 107,the Report shows the reader how to contact some of the individuals involved in
the GPOC effort—including addresses and phone numbers of the principal participants.
Appendices
The appendices to the GPOC Final Report include a detailed list(with summaries) of 19
separate reports and studies that GPOC members or staff reviewed in preparation for the
Final Report Included in these summaries is a highlighted section that shows where the
summarized document's conclusions"link" with those of the GPOC (page 113).
Page 4
Findings and Recommendations for
Orange County Special Districts
L Move Towards Consolidation,Dissolution of Special Districts. The Fact Book an:vat focus
groups and interviews convinced us that Orange County has more government entities'-tan is
necessary to provide for adequate service delivery. Improved service and savings mare
achieved by thoughtful consolidation and dissolution of some special districts. ♦We ximmsnd
Orange County residents support the Loral Agency Formation Commission(LAFCO)in its mydtnd
initiation of restructuring proposals if deemed in the public interest We suggest that in the fort LAFCO
should evaluate all special districts from a "rmo-baud"perspectim evaluating eaM's need threagh a
service delivery reoiero of districts and their spheres at least once every 10 years.
2 Consolidation Must Reflect local Circumstances. The Fact Book and our focus groin
remind us that consolidation and dissolution requires careful review of serious issues that vary
from district to district,including.
•Water rights and sources •Debt variations
•Service levels and rates •Historical asses
•Assets and liabilities •Governance structures and political
representation,
The Ford-Sauvajot Study of IS special districts in central and south Orange County,a draft report
of which was released in Spring 1996(summarized in Appendix A,page 118),appears to provide
strong precedent for such review. ♦We recommend to LAFCO and to Orange County residents and
legislators that any process for consolidation should provide for maximum local mmero and public input.
We suggest that the State should limit its role in crosolfdation to calling for mstruchning and setting
reasonable timelines for change. Should local officals fail toad,the State could reasonably foroe necessary
consolidations. LAFCO and the public should consider full adoption of the recommendations of the Ford-
Sauvajot Study.
3. Retail Districts Deserve LAFCO Scrutiny. The Fact Book and our interviews show us that
special districts,especially"retail" districts(those that deliver a service directly to a resident or
business)should be large enough to achieve optimum economies of scale while also supporting
public involvement,and accountability. •We recommend that Orange County residents encourage
retail districts that do not meet the abode-uated goal to be absorbed into a general public purpose
organization. We further suggest that LAFCO direct that retail districts that do meet the goal conform
their serous spheres to municipal boundaries to the extent feasible.
4. LAFCO Needs Help to Get it Done The Fact Book shows that LAFCO's resources do not
appear to be sufficient to aggressively pursue consolidation and dissolution of special districts.
♦We recommend that the County,aided by contributions from cities,should provide greater General Fund
allomfim to LAFCO for a three year period(staffed unth limited term positions)to ensure a high quality
and timely review of consolidation proposals. Further,the County should use those positions doumsized in
EMA/Plaming(see Recommendation ill for EMA)for LAFCO's additional needs(again an a limited term
basis).
S. All District Financial Data=Public Records. While compiling the Fact Book,we found that
data collection process showed poor and user-unfriendly budget and financial reports by several
special districts. One district,Carpenter Irrigation,refused to provide GPOC with any data or a
district budget ♦We call upon all governments to comply toith frnannab reporting procedures outlined
by the Gooeratmental Accounting Standards Board(GASH),including uniform accounting standards and
uniform budget reporting. Request State Controller's assistance in more rapid completion of Reports of
Financial Transactions. Remind local governments of their obligation to the taxpaying public rebating to
open records and financial disclosure.
Page 100
v
•
Findings and Recommendations for
Orange County Special Districts (cont'd)
6. Greater Communication Required. Our interviews remind us that the changes in the regional
service delivery environment will impact special districts in a significant way. ♦We recommend
that the sanitation and water districts expand their participation(panccrpatzon which Aces not affect
districts'operational decisions)in forums or structure that improve communication. Associations such as
Me Independent Special Districts of Orange County(ISDOC)and the Water Advisory Committee Orange
County(WACO)should be retained and nurtured as effective inforraationsharing vehicles.
Page 101
AGENDA
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708
REGULAR MEETING
SEPTEMBER 25, 1996 -7:30 P.M.
................ l
iIn accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this I
agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the Districts'Administrative Offices not less I
than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to
each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. i
i In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the
Boards for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b)
i as an emergency item or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came
i to the attention of the Districts subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on
a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date.
(1) Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance
(2) Roll call
(3) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies
relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders)
(4) Appointment of Chair pro tem, if necessary
(5) Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Boards on specific agenda
items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by
the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion
and remarks may be limited to five minutes.
Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this
agenda cannot have action taken by the Boards of Directors except as
authorized by Section 54954.2(b).
09125/96
t
(6) The Joint Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports
on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are
for information only and require no action by the Directors.
(a) Report of Joint Chair; consideration of Resolutions or commendations,
presentations and awards
(b) Report of General Manager
(c) Report of General Counsel
(7) EACH DISTRICT
If no corrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will be deemed
approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair:
District 1 - August 28, 1996 regular
District 2 - August 28, 1996 regular
District 3 - August 28, 1996 regular
District 5 - August 28, 1996 regular
District 6 - August 28, 1996 regular
District 7 - August 28, 1996 regular
District 11 - August 28, 1996 regular
District 13 - July 24, 1996 regular and August 28, 1996 regular
District 14 - August 28, 1996 regular
(8) Ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts, by roll call vote,
as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as
the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote
differently for any District.)
ALL DISTRICTS O8/07/96 O8/21/96 MISC.
Joint Operating Fund - $1,040,405.06 $523,972.97 $ 2,618.50
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 2,301,318.40 704,668.80 0.00
Joint Working Capital Fund - 237,881.45 242,106.62 1,030.10
Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 133,819.56 19,998.59 29,905.95
DISTRICT NO. 1 - (936.30) 0.00 692.78
DISTRICT NO. 2 - 499.31 2,102.92 2,167.40
DISTRICT NO. 3 - 110,034.68 20,153.82 1,993.35
DISTRICT NO. 5 - 3,407.61 273.28 265.83
DISTRICT NO. 6 - (446.33) 0.00 278.74
DISTRICT NO. 7 - 36,504.72 150,804.14 624.11
DISTRICT NO. 11 - (547.43) 160,948.44 516.69
DISTRICT NO. 13 - 2.55 0.00 73.43
DISTRICT NO. 14 - 47.13 0.00 186.28
DISTRICT NOS. 3 & 11 JOINT - 1.875.00 0.00 0.00
DISTRICT NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 4,177.42 8,859.30 0.00
DISTRICT NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 2,202.90 0.00 0.00
DISTRICT NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 7,294.62 14.76 0.00
$3.877.540.35 $1.833.903.64 $40,353.17
-2-
09/25/96
CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEMS (9) - (11)
"_._.._.. ._.._.. ,._.._.._..._..._............_......................._..._.._..._..._.._.._....................._.._..._.._...._.._.._.._.._...._.._.._.�
i All matters placed on the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or i
i further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the
i consent calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there
will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be
enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions I
included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be
considered in the regular order of business. I
I
i Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon
recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by number the item to be I
i removed from the consent calendar.
i
j The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. i
Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar not
specifically removed from same, as follows:
DISTRICT NO. 5
(9) ORDER ANNEXATION NO. 9 -CRYSTAL COVE STATE PARK: The Director of
Engineering requests approval of ordering annexation of a 20-acre portion of Crystal Cove
State Park known as the"Historic District", located on Pacific Coast Highway north of the
intersection of Sand Canyon Avenue.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Resolution ordering Annexation No. 9- Crystal Cove
State Park to County Sanitation District No. 5.
DISTRICT NO. 7
(10) ORDER ANNEXATION NO. 151 - GOODMAN ANNEXATION: The Director of
Engineering requests approval of ordering annexation of 1.01 acres of unincorporated
county territory south of the intersection of Lower Lake Drive and Lake Court.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Resolution ordering Annexation No. 151 -Goodman
Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7.
DISTRICT NO. 13 (Carried over from 0828/96 meeting due to lack of quorum)
(11) Consideration of motion approving a new negotiated Consent Decree re U.S. Government
v. Montrose Chemical Corp., at at., at no cost to the Districts.
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
(12) Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any
-3-
09/25/96
NON-CONSENT CALENDAR
ALL DISTRICTS
(13) (a) Verbal Report by Chair of Steering Committee re September 25, 1996 meeting.
(b) DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and file Steering Committee Minutes for the
meeting held on August 28, 1996.
(14) (a) Verbal Report by Chair of Planning, Design and Construction Committee re
September 5, 1996 Meeting.
(b) DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and file draft Planning, Design, and
Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on September 5, 1996.
(c) JOB NO. P2-58 WITH GIERLICH-MITCHELL, INC. FOR GRIT AUGER
IMPROVEMENT AT PLANT NO. 2 (All Districts): The Engineering Department
requests authority to issue a purchase order for rehabilitation of grit auger at
Plant No. 2, for a total amount not to exceed $63,680.00. (PDC96-47)
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Authorize issuance of a purchase order for Job
No. P2-58, Grit Auger Improvement at Plant No. 2, to Gierlich-Mitchell, Inc. for
design, manufacturing and installation services, for a total amount not to exceed
$63,680.00.
(d) CHANGE ORDER NO, 4 TO JOB NO. P1-36-2 WITH MARGATE
CONSTRUCTION FOR SECONDARY TREATMENT IMPROVEMENTS AT
PLANT NO. 1 (All Districts): The Construction Manager and Director of
Engineering request approval of Change Order No. 4 providing for seven items of
additional work and four credit items. (PDC96-42)
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve Change Order No. 4 to Job No. Pt-36-2 with
Margate Construction for an addition of$24,733.00, increasing the total contract
amount to $34,918,007.00.
(a) PHASE II AND III OF THE STRATEGIC PLAN (All Districts): The Engineering
Department requests approval of professional services agreements for Phase II
and Phase III of the Strategic Plan for engineering services and preparation of a
Programmatic Environmental Impact Report. (PDC96-45)
RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1) Authorize staff to solicit proposals and negotiate a
Professional Services Agreement for engineering services for Phase II, Treatment,
Reuse and Disposal Facilities: and 2)Authorize staff to solicit proposals and
negotiate a Professional Services Agreement re Phase III of the Strategic Plan for
preparation of Programmatic Environmental Impact Report. (PDC96-45)
-4-
[ITEM (14) CONTINUED ON PAGE 5]
09/25/96
ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 4)
(14) (f) ADDENDUM NO. 3 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH LEE&
RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. FOR MODIFICATIONS TO ELECTRICAL
AND CONTROL SYSTEMS, AND PROCESS EVALUATIONS AT PLANT NO. 1,
JOB NO. P1-40.1,AND MODIFICATIONS TO ELECTRICAL AND CONTROL
SYSTEMS, AND PROCESS EVALUATIONS AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-47-1
(AIL Districts): The Engineering Department requests the approval of an addendum
to the agreement providing for additional engineering services and design
changes. (PDC96-37)
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve execution of Addendum No. 3 to
Professional Services Agreement with Lee & Ro Consulting Engineers, Inc., in the
amount of$76,801.00, for a total amount not to exceed $1,247,967.00.
(g) JOB NO. P1-40-2 (REBID), FACILITY MODIFICATIONS AND SAFETY
UPGRADES AT PLANT NO. 1, AND JOB NO. P2-47-2 (REBID), FACILITY
MODIFICATIONS AND SAFETY UPGRADES AT PLANT NO. 2 (AIL Districts): The
Director of Engineering requests that a construction contract be awarded re
miscellaneous tasks for operational and safety related improvements to the
treatment plants. The PDC Committee and Executive Committee reviewed the
proposed actions by the Joint Boards at their meeting of September 25, 1996 in
response to a protest letter from Margate Construction, Inc. protesting the bid of
Pascal & Ludwig Engineers. (POC96-49)
ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION: 1) Approve Addendum No. 1 to the plans and
specifications correcting the date for receipt of bids; 2) Receive and file letter dated
August 21, 1996 from Margate Construction, Inc. protesting the bid of Pascal and
Ludwig Engineers; 3) Receive and file memoranda from General Counsel dated
September 10, 1996 and September 17, 1996;
-AND-
4) Reject protest of Margate Construction, Inc.; 5) Receive and file bid tabulation
and recommendation; and 6)Award contract to Pascal & Ludwig Engineers for Job
Nos. Pl-40-2 (Rebid) and P2-47-2 (Rebid), in a total amount of$1,878,437.00;
-OR-
7)Accept protest of Margate Construction, Inc., declaring Pascal and Ludwig
Engineers are ineligible to bid pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 5105;
8)Award contract to Margate Construction, Inc., second lowest bidder, for Job
Nos. P1-40-2 (Rebid) and P2-47-2 (Rebid), in a total amount of$1,900,000.00.
STAFF'S RECOMMENDATIONS: Items 1 through 6.
-5-
[ITEM (14) CONTINUED ON PAGE 6]
09/25/96
(14) DISTRICT 3 (Continued from page 5)
(h) CHANGE ORDER NOS. 2 AND 3 TO CONTRACT NO. 3.36R, WESTMINSTER
AVENUE FORCE MAIN (FIRST UNIT)AND NEW WESTSIDE PUMP STATION
FORCE MAIN, WITH ALBERT W. DAVIES, INC., AND NOTICE OF COMPLETION
(District 3): The Construction Manager and Director of Engineering request
approval of Change Order No. 2, providing six items of additional work and
granting a time extension of 25 calendar days for completion of said additional
work; approval of Change Order No. 3, providing for an adjustment of Engineer's
estimated quantities; and approve execution of the Final Closeout Agreement and
filing of a Notice of Completion. (PDC96-44)
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: 1)Approve Change Order No. 2 to Contract
No. 3-36R with Albert W. Davies, Inc. for an addition of$31,301.55 and
25 calendar days; 2)Approve Change Order No. 3, authorizing a net deduction of
$42,216.00, decreasing the total contract amount to $3,823,756.55; and
3)Approve execution of Final Closeout Agreement and authorize filing of a Notice
of Completion.
ALL DISTRICTS
(15) (a) Verbal Report by Chair of Finance, Administration and Human Resources
Committee re September 11, 1996 Meeting.
(b) DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION, AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE
MINUTES
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and file draft Finance, Administration, and
Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on September 11,
1996.
(c) TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF JULY 1996 (FAHR96-49)
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of
July 1996.
(d) ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE DISTRICTS' INVESTMENT POLICY (All Districts):
The Director of Finance requests revision of the Districts' Investment Policy
Statement. (FAHR96.51)
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS 1) Receive and file Staff Report dated
September 11, 1996; 2) Receive and file Investment Policy approved by Finance,
Administration and Human Resources Committee on September 11, 1996; and
3) Adopt a Resolution, amending Resolution No. 95-78 and repealing Resolution
Nos. 95-14 and 95-15.
-6-
[ITEM (15) CONTINUED ON PAGE 71
09/25/96
(15) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 6)
(a) ORDINANCE NO. 132, AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
PROVIDING FOR AN EARLY RETIREMENT INCENTIVE PROGRAM BY
GRANTING ADDITIONAL SERVICE CREDIT TO ELIGIBLE DISTRICTS'
EMPLOYEES AS AUTHORIZED BY THE COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT
LAW OF 1937, GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 31641.04 (All Districts): The
Director of Human Resources, in conjunction with the FAHR Committee, requests
that an Ordinance be adopted providing for two additional years of service credit to
eligible Districts' employees who retire between January 1 and March 31, 1997, in
accordance with provisions of Government Code Section 31641.04. (FAHR96-52)
RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1) Read proposed Ordinance No. 132 by title only,
and waive reading of entire ordinance; and 2) Introduce Ordinance No. 132 and
pass to second reading and adoption at the October 23, 1996 Board Meeting.
(f) PROPOSITION 218, RIGHT TO VOTE ON TAXES ACT(All Districts): The Chief
Administrative Officer(CAO) requests the Boards to declare their opposition to
Proposition 218. (FAHR96-54)
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve FAHR Committee's recommendation taking
no official position on Proposition 218, and direct staff to continue gathering and
distributing information regarding potential impacts of the measure.
(16) (a) Verbal Report by Chair of Executive Committee re September 18, 1996 Meeting.
(b) DRAFT EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MINUTES
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and file draft Executive Committee Minutes
for the meeting held on September 18, 1996.
(c) LAFCO APPLICATION FOR THE CONSOLIDATION OF THE COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY (All Districts): Staff requests
approval by each District of the LAFCO application for the consideration of the nine
County Sanitation Districts.
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS (Each District): 1)Adopt a Resolution Initiating
Proposal to Consolidate Districts; 2) Approve application package to be submitted
to LAFCO, including the Terms and Conditions and Justification Proposal; and
3)Authorize submittal of application to LAFCO for the consolidation.
-7-
09/25/96
(17) ALL DISTRICTS
.._............_............._................................_.............................---
_.._..._.._...........................
._..._........
._..._.._.
I CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on i
i this agenda as a regular meeting of the Boards,the Chair may convene the i
Boards in closed session to consider matters of pending real estate
negotiations,pending or potential litigation,or personnel matters, pursuant to
Government Code Sections 54956.8,54956.9,54957 or 54957.6,as noted.
Reports relating to(a) purchase and sale of real property; (b)matters of
i pending or potential litigation;(c)employment actions or negotiations with
i employee representatives;or which are exempt from public disclosure under
the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Boards during a I
i permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such
time as final actions are taken by the Boards on any of these subjects,the
minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information.
.._.._.._.._..._._.._.._...............
_.._..._.._..._.._.._..._.._.._.._.._..._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._..._.._._.._..._.II
(a) Convene in closed session, if necessary
(b) (1) Confer with General Counsel re status of litigation, Patterson v. County
Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court Case
Nos. 738179, 738622 and 741371 (Government Code Section 54956.9[a]).
(2) Confer with General Counsel re status of litigation, Louis Sangennano v.
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Orange County Superior
Court Case No. 732680 (Government Code Section 54956.9[a]).
(3) Confer with General Counsel re status of litigation, County Sanitation
Districts of Orange County v. E.L. Yeager Construction Company, at al.,
Orange County Superior Court Case No. 732578 (Government Code
Section 54956.9[a]).
(4) MOU Labor negotiations
(c) Reconvene in regular session
(d) Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session
(18) Matters which a Director would like staff to report on at a subsequent meeting
(19) Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff report
(20) Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(21) Adjournments
.8-
09/25/96
NOTICE TO DIRECTORS: To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Joint I
i Boards, Directors shall submit items to the Board Secretary not later than the dose of business I
14 days preceding the Joint Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on the agenda
all items submitted by Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and all formal
i communications. I
v
Board Secretary: Penny Kos (714) 962.2411, ext. 2026
j Secretary: Patricia L. Jonk (714) 962.2411. ext. 2029
Secretary: Janet L. Gray (714) 962-2411, ext. 2027
:._._.._.._.._..._.._.._..._.._._.........................._.._._....._...............
—.--'.—.-'------'
-9-
J:\WPDOC\BSWG961SEP96%-0a.W PD
�L
0
9
COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14
OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
MINUTES
JOINT BOARD MEETING
AUGUST 28, 1996
RICTS Of p9g2
ye � no
� G
J a
E
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018
ROLL CALL
A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7, 11, 13,and 14 of
Orange County,California,was held on August 28, 1996,at 7:30 p.m.,in the Districts'Administrative Offices. Following the
Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1,2,
3,5,6,7,11,and 14 as follows:
ACTIVE ALTERNATE
DIRECTORS DIRECTORS
DISTRICT NO.1: _x Pat McGuigan,Chair _ Ted R. Moreno
Y James M.Ferryman,Chair pro tern _ Arthur Perry
a Mark A Murphy Joanne Coontz
Thomas R.Saharelli Jim Potts
, x Roger Stanton Wiliam G.Steiner
DISTRICT NO.2: __A__ Norman Z. Eckenrode,Chair Carol Downey
3_ Daniel T.Welch,Chair pro tern John M.Gullorson
_* John Collins George Scott
* Barry Denea Bob Bell
* _ Burnie Dunlap Glenn Parker
* James H. Flora Steve Anderson
x Pat McGuigan Ted R.Moreno
_jL_ Mark A Murphy Joanne Coontz
X _ Chris Norby Don Bankhead
__X_ Sheldon Singer George L Laket
• Roger Stanton Wiliam G.Steiner
• Bob Zemel Tom Day
DISTRICT NO.3: _x Sal A. Sapien,Chair Harry A Dotson
• Sheldon Singer,Chair pro tern George L.Laket
• Waiter Bowman Gail Kerry
_• George Brown Marilyn Bruce Hastings
, •L_ John Collins George Scott
—A-_ Burnie Dunlap Glenn Parker
• James H.Flora Steve Anderson
• Don R.Griffin Patsy Marshall
• Victor Leipzig Ralph Bauer
• Wally Linn Eve G.Miner
_• Pat McGuigan _ Ted R.Moreno
__IL._ Chris Norby Don Bankhead
• Margie L.Rice James V. Evans
_• Roger Stanton Wiliam G.Steiner
, •L_ Charles Sylvia Robert Wahlatrom
_• Bob Zenner Tom Day
DISTRICT NO. 5: _x Jan Debay,Chair John C.Cox,Jr.
• William G.Steiner,Chair pro tern _ Roger Stanton
John C.Cox,Jr. x Jan Debay
DISTRICT NO.6: x James M.Ferryman,Chair Arthur Perry
_x Jan Debay,Chair pro tern _ John C.Cox,Jr.
_y_ William G. Steiner _ Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO.7: x Barry Hammond.Chair Mike Ward
x Thomas R.Saltarelli,Chair pro tem _ Jim Potts
x Jan Debay John C.Cox,Jr.
_x James M.Ferryman _ Arthur Perry
�L_ Pat McGuigan _ Ted R.Moreno
a Mark A Murphy _ Joanne Coon
x Wiliam G. Steiner _ Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO. 11: x_ Victor Leipzig,Chair Ralph Bauer
X Shirley Dettloff,Chair pro tern _ Ralph Bauer
x Roger Stanton Wiliam G.Steiner
DISTRICT NO. 13: a John M.Guibson,Chair Daniel T.Welch
3 Bob Zemel,Chair pro tem Tom Day
* Burnie Dunlap Glenn Parker
_rL_ Mark A.Murphy Joanne Coon
x William G.Steiner Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO. 14: x Thomas R.Saharelli,Chair Jim Potts
* Mark A-Murphy,Chair pro tem Joanne Coon
* Barry Hammond Mike Ward
_ * Wiliam G.Steiner Roger Stanton
_L Peer A Swan Darryl Miller
-2-
6
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Minutes
8/26/96
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Blake P. Anderson, Assistant General
Manager-Operations, Judith A. Wilson, Assistant
General Manager-Administration, Penny Kyle, Board
Secretary, Chris Dahl, Janet Gray, Irwin Haydock,
Patricia Jonk, John Linder, Mike Moore, Bob Ooten,
Mike Peterman, Michelle Tuchman, Nancy Wheatley,
Mike White
OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Bill Knopf,
Mary Lee, Craig Scott, Phil Stone, Nancy Whitehead
DISTRICT 13
Adjournment of meeting due to
lack of quorum
This 28th day of August, 1996, at 7:30 p.m., being the time and place for the
Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of
Orange County, California, and there not being a quorum present in District
No. 13, the meeting of said District was thereupon adjourned by the Secretary.
DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7,11 & 14
Adoption of resolution of appreciation
for immediate oast Joint Chair John C. Cox, Jr.
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution 96-78 commending
Director John Cox for his contributions to the Districts during his tenure as Joint
Chair. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these
minutes.
Joint Chair John Collins stated that the resolution would be formally presented to
Director Cox during a future board meeting.
DISTRICT 2
Election of Chair
Due to the recent election of John Collins as Joint Chair, nominations were
opened for the Chair of District No. 2. Director Norman Eckenrode was
nominated and no further nominations were made.
-3-
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Minutes
8/28/96
DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7,11, & 14
Reoort of the Joint Chair
At the invitation of Joint Chair John Collins, Jan Debay spoke about a recent
CASA conference held in Monterey.
Joint Chair John Collins advised that the next Quarterly Strategic Planning
Workshop was scheduled for Saturday, September 21, from 9:00 a.m. until noon
in the Board Room at Plant No. 1. Progress reports on the investigation of the
Districts' ocean ouffalls will be presented by staff. A discussion of Project 2,
management of peak flows, and the impact on the existing outfall system will be
conducted.
The Second Annual Family Day for Districts' employees will be held on
October 12 from 10:00 a.m. until 2:30 p.m., at Plant No. 2. Directors were
encouraged to attend the tours and enjoy lunch at Family Day.
The Joint Chair offered congratulations to Director Pat McGuigan on her receipt
of a national award from the YWCA, recognizing her as part of the Salute to
Women in Leadership: A Power for Change campaign. He noted Director
McGuigan's long-term involvement in YWCA activities, as well as her
participation on its Board of Directors.
The following tentatively scheduled upcoming meetings were then announced as
follows:
Planning, Design, and Construction Committee -Thursday,
September 5, at 5:30 p.m.
Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee -
Wednesday, September 11, at 5:30 p.m.
Executive Committee -Wednesday, September 18, at 5:30 p.m.
Steering Committee -Wednesday, September 25, at 5:30 p.m.
The Joint Chair pointed out that the Operations, Maintenance, and Technical
Services Committee meeting, originally scheduled for Wednesday, September 4,
had been canceled.
-4-
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Minutes
8/28196
DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14
Report of General Manager
Blake Anderson, acting General Manager, reported that EPA would be visiting in
early September to review our industrial source control program. The EPA will
use our program as a benchmark of effectiveness and cost efficiency.
Mr. Anderson recognized Judy Wilson, who then introduced Chris Dahl, the new
Information Technology Manager for the Districts.
DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14
Report of General Counsel
Mr. Woodruff emphasized that representation on the Board of Directors of
CASA needed to continue.
He advised that there was one item on the supplemental agenda concerning a
stop notice received since publication of the original agenda.
DISTRICT 1
Approval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting
held July 24, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as
mailed.
DISTRICT 2
Approval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting
held July 24, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as
mailed.
DISTRICT 3
Approval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting
held July 24, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as
mailed.
-5-
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Minutes
8/28196
DISTRICT 5
Approval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting
held July 24, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as
mailed.
DISTRICT 6
Approval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting
held July 24, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as
mailed.
DISTRICT 7
Approval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting
held July 24, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as
mailed.
DISTRICT 11
Approval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting
held July 24, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as
mailed.
DISTRICT 14
Approval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting
held July 24, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as
mailed.
-6-
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Minutes
8/28/96
DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14
Ratification of Payment of Joint and
Individual District Claims
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That payment of Joint and Individual District claims set forth on exhibits "A" , .'B",
and "C", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized
below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so
indicated.
ALL DISTRICTS 07/10/96 07/24/96 misc.
Joint Operating Fund - $606,937.65 $747,562.51 $ 51,378.48
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 1,466,247.71 217.567.50 10,364.12
Joint Working Capital Fund - 105,895.63 173,119.71 2,325.00
Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 80,530.52 53,010.30 1,244,479.20
DISTRICT NO. 1 - 0.00 3,321.53 0.00
DISTRICT NO. 2 - 12,568.64 24,753.37 0.00
DISTRICT NO. 3 - 57,891.97 67,656.02 0.00
DISTRICT NO. 5 - 3,494.13 4,939.46 0.00
DISTRICT NO. 6 - 0.00 2,154.80 0.00
DISTRICT NO. 7 - 12,370.89 48,434.56 0.00
DISTRICT NO. 11 - 720.96 21,649.35 0.00
DISTRICT NO. 13 - 0.00 0.00 0.00
DISTRICT NO. 14 - 210.00 297.50 0.00
DISTRICTS NOS. 5 &6 JOINT - 1,540.35 47,182.67 0.00
DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 3,491.48 0.00 0.00
DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 2,816.48 0.00 0.00
$2.354.716.31 $1.411.649.28 $1.308.546.60
DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14
Approving a new negotiated
Consent Decree re U.S. Government
v. Montrose Chemical Corp.. at al.
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the new negotiated Consent Decree re U.S. Government v. Montrose
Chemical Corp., at al., be, and is hereby, approved at no cost to the Districts.
-7-
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Minutes
8128/96
DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14
Amending Resolution No. 96-76,
Fixing and Establishing Rules of
Procedure for the Conduct of
Business of the Districts
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 96-76, amending
Resolution No. 95-30, Fixing and Establishing Rules of Procedure for the
Conduct of Business of the Districts, providing for the Steering Committee
membership to include the immediate Past Joint Chair. Said resolution, by
reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14
Verbal report from Chair of Steering Committee
re August 28, 1996 meeting
Joint Chair John Collins, Chair of the Steering Committee, gave a brief verbal
report on the August 28, 1996 meeting.
DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14
Receive and file draft minutes of the
Steering Committee
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the draft minutes of the Steering Committee meeting held on July 24,
1996, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed.
DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14
Verbal report from Chair of Planning.
Design. and Construction Committee
re August 1. 1996 meeting
Director Sheldon Singer, Chair of the Planning, Design, and Construction
Committee, gave a brief verbal report on the items being recommended for
approval.
-8-
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Minutes
8/28196
DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7,11 & 14
Receive and file draft minutes of the Planning.
Design, and Construction Committee
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the draft minutes of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee
meeting held on August 1, 1996, be, and are hereby, received and ordered
filed.
DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5,6,7.11 & 14 (PDC96-29)
Actions re Office Trailer Relocations at
Plants Nos. 1 and 2. Soecification
No. M-044 (Rebid)
Approving Change Order No. 1 to the
plans and specifications for Specification
No. M-044 (Rebid)
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for said project,
authorizing an addition of$11,017.00 to the contract with Colich Bros.,
Inc. dba Colich & Sons for four items of additional or deleted work and
time extensions, granting a total time extension of 100 calendar days for
completion of said work, be, and is hereby, approved.
Accepting Specification No. M-044 (Rebid)
as complete
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Office Trailer Relocations at Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Specification
No. M-044 (Rebid), be, and is hereby, accepted as complete, and,
FURTHER MOVED: That execution of a Notice of Completion and
approving Final Closeout Agreement for a final total contract amount of
$309,717.00, be, and is hereby, authorized.
-9-
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Minutes
8/28/96
DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14 (PDC96-30)
Approving Change Order No. 3 to the
plans and specifications for Job
No. P1-36-2
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications for Secondary
Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36-2, authorizing a net
deduction of$100,226.00 from the contract with Margate Construction for 15
items of additional or deleted work, be, and is hereby, approved.
DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14 (PDC96-32)
Accepting Secondary Treatment Expansion at
Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-2, as complete
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-2, be,
and is hereby, accepted as complete; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That execution of a Notice of Completion and approving
Final Closeout Agreement for a final total contract amount of$14,350,183.00,
be, and is hereby, authorized.
DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14 (PDC96-36)
Aoorovino plans and specifications
re Job No. J-34-1 and Job No. P2-35-5
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the plans and specifications for Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades, Job
No. J-34-1, and Phase 2 Site and Security Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job
No. P2-35-5, be, and are hereby, approved; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized
to establish the date for receipt of bids.
-10-
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Minutes
8/28/96
DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14 (PDC96-35)
Actions re Restoration of Old Laboratory
for Human Resources Department, Job
No. J-11-2
Approving Addendum No. 1 to
the plans and specifications
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for said project
making miscellaneous clarifications be, and is hereby, approved.
Awarding contract for Restoration of
Old Laboratory for Human Resources
Department, Job No. J-11-2
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby receive and file bid tabulation and
recommendation, and award contract for Restoration of Old Laboratory
for Human Resources Department, Job No. J-11-2, to Varkel
Construction, Inc., in the total amount of$288,800.00.
DISTRICTS 1.2,3.5.6.7.11 & 14 (PDC96-39)
Ratifying emergency action of the
Planning. Design. and Construction
Committee re Job No. J-25-3
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the emergency action of the Planning, Design, and Construction
Committee approving and authorizing the General Manager to execute a
Professional Services Agreement to provide specialized consulting services re
Power Source Reliability Evaluation, Job No. J-25-3, with General Electric
Electrical Distribution & Control, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus
overhead, indirect costs, direct expenses, and fixed profit in an amount not to
exceed $104,000.00, plus Errors & Omissions insurance costs, be, and is
hereby, ratified.
_11_
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Minutes
8/28/96
DISTRICTS 1.2,3,5.6.7.11 & 14
Verbal report from Chair of Finance.
Administration. and Human Resources
Committee re August 7. 1996 meeting
Director George Brown, Chair of the Finance, Administration, and Human
Resources Committee, gave a brief verbal report on the items being
recommended for approval.
DISTRICTS 123.5.67,11 & 14
Receive and file draft minutes of the Finance
Administration. and Human Resources Committee
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the draft minutes of the Finance, Administration, and Human Resources
Committee meeting held on August 7, 1996, be, and are hereby, received and
ordered filed.
DISTRICTS 1,2.3.5,6.7,11 & 14 (FAHR96-46)
Receive and file Treasurer's Report
for the month of June 1996
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Treasurer's Report for the month of June 1996, be, and is hereby,
received and ordered filed.
DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14 (FAHR96-47)
Action re Basic Integrated Reuse
Project (BIRP)
Authorizing staff to negotiate an
amendment to the Joint Ownership.
Operation and Construction Agreement
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to negotiate an amendment to
the Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement dated
December 11, 1985 and as amended February 13, 1986, to provide that
the 1996-97 flow excludes up to 3.2 mgd if the three-party BIRP is
approved; maintain the June 30, 1997 equity sale from District No. 14 to
-12-
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Minutes
8/28/96
the other Districts calculated on the basis of excluding up to 3.2 mgd for
approximately four months as an inter-District payable/receivable of
approximately $4.8 million; and, transfer the funds in 1999-2000 in order
to eliminate the negative cash flow impacts on the other Districts from the
accelerated flow reduction.
Authorizing staff to negotiate an
amendment to the First Amended and
Restated Agreement for Utilization of
Reclaimed Wastewater Agreement
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to negotiate an amendment to
the First Amended and Restated Agreement for Utilization of Reclaimed
Wastewater Agreement, dated June 9, 1993, with OCWD re Green Acres
Project (GAP) water, to include a long-term commitment to purchase and
to supply reclaimed water at a mutually agreeable price which reflects
potential OCWD savings and does not exceed the costs of operations
and maintenance.
DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14 (FAHR96-48)
Amending Resolution No. 95-105,
Personnel and Salary Resolution
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 96-77, amending
Personnel and Salary Resolution No. 95-105, adopting a Firearms and
Weapons Policy. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of
these minutes.
DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14
Actions re Main Sewage Pump (MSP) No. 3 Drive
at Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-33-2
Approving Addendum No. 1 to the
plans and specifications
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for said project,
making miscellaneous clarifications, be and is hereby, approved.
-13-
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Minutes
8/28/96
Awarding contract to Pascal & Ludwig
Engineers
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby receive and file bid tabulation and
recommendation, and award contract for Main Sewage Pump (MSP)
No. 3 Drive at Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-33-2, to Pascal
& Ludwig Engineers in the total amount of$516,000.00.
DISTRICTS 1.2,3.5.6.7.11 & 14
General Counsel's comments Prior to Closed Session
General Counsel reported to the Directors the need for a closed session as
authorized by Government Code Sections 54956.9 and 54957.6 to discuss and
consider the items that are specified as Items 17(b)(1) through 17(b)(7) on the
published agenda. General Counsel also indicated a need to add one item
needing immediate attention, and stated that the need for said attention came
subsequent to the posting of the agenda. He reported that additional items
could be added pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2(b) upon a
two-thirds vote of the Directors. No other items would be discussed or acted
upon.
DISTRICTS 3 & 11
Actions re Supplemental Agenda Item
relative to Summons and Complaint for Breach
of Contract and Enforcement of Stop Notice,
Paramount Fabricators. Inc. v Colich & Sons, at al..
Orange County Superior Court Case No. 767890,
in connection with Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewaae
System Improvements. Contract No. 11-17-1
Authorizing consideration of Supplemental Agenda
Item relative to Summons and Complaint for Breach
of Contract and Enforcement of Stoo Notice,
Paramount Fabricators. Inc. v. Colich & Sons, at al.
Orange County Superior Court Case No. 767890
Moved, seconded, and duly carried by unanimous vote:
That the Boards of Directors of Districts No. 3 and 11 do hereby
authorize consideration of supplemental agenda item relative to
Summons and Complaint for Breach of Contract and Enforcement of
-14-
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Minutes
8128196
Stop Notice, Paramount Fabricators, Inc. v. Colich & Sons, at al., Orange
County Superior Court Case No. 767890, in connection with Slater
Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements, Contract
No. 11-17-I, which was not posted 72 hours prior to the Board meeting
date because the request to take said action arose subsequent to the
agenda being posted.
Receive and file Summons and Complaint
for Breach of Contract and Enforcement of Stop
Notice, Paramount Fabricators. Inc. v. Colich &
Sons. at al. Orange County Superior Court Case
No. 767890
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Summons and Complaint for Breach of Contract and
Enforcement of Stop Notice, Paramount Fabricators, Inc. v. Colich &
Sons, at al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 767890, in
connection with Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System
Improvements, Contract No. 11-17-I, be, and is hereby, received and
ordered filed; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Districts' General Counsel be, and is
hereby, authorized to appear and defend the interests of the Districts.
DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14
Convene in Closed Session pursuant to
Government Code Sections 54956.9(a) and 54957.6
The Boards convened in closed session at 8:23 p.m. pursuant to Government
Code Sections 54956.9(a) and 54957.6. Confidential Minutes of the Closed
Session held by the Boards of Directors have been prepared in accordance with
California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board
Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee
Closed Meetings. No actions were taken re Agenda Item Nos. 24(b)(1) and
24(b)(2).
DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14
Reconvene in regular session
At 9:29 p.m., the Boards reconvened in regular session.
-15-
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Minutes
8/28/96
DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14
Denying claim of Larry and Donna
Anderson, Claim No. 5-CSD-96-L-4.5.
re Bay Bridge Pump Station sewage spill
Upon return from closed session, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the claim of Larry and Donna Anderson, Claim No. 5-CSD-96-L-4.5, for
property damage re Bay Bridge Pump Station sewage spill, be, and is hereby,
denied.
DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14
Denying claim of Mr. and Mrs. William
T. White, III, Claim No. 5-CSD-96-L-4.13.
re Bay Bridge Pump Station sewage spill
Upon return from closed session, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the claim of Mr. and Mrs. William T. White, III, Claim No. 5-CSD-96-L4.13,
for property damage re Bay Bridge Pump Station sewage spill, be, and is
hereby, denied.
DISTRICT 1
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1
be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at
9:29 p.m.
DISTRICT 2
Adopting Rules of Procedure for Administrative
Proceedings before the Executive Committee or
Board(s) of Directors
Upon return from closed session, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That Rules of Procedure for Administrative Proceedings before the Executive
Committee or Board(s) of Directors, attached hereto and incorporated herein by
reference, be, and are hereby, adopted.
-16-
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Minutes
8/28196
DISTRICT 2
Adiournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2
be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:29 p.m.
DISTRICT 3
Aporovina olans and specifications for
Contract No. 3-35R-1
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the plans and specifications for Magnolia Relief Trunk Sewer, Westminster
Avenue to Trask Avenue, Contract No. 3-35R-1, be, and are hereby, approved;
and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized
to establish the date for receipt of bids.
DISTRICT 3
Approving increase in authorized fees to
special counsel Griffin-Carrick re District
No. 3 vs. United Technologies Corp., at al.
Upon return from closed session, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue Change Order No. 5 in an
amount of$20,000.00 to Purchase Order No. 54292 issued to special counsel
Griffin-Carrick, increasing the authorized amount from an amount not to exceed
$50,000.00 to an amount not to exceed $70,000.00 for special counsel legal
fees, re litigation for recovery of District damages-County Sanitation District
No. 3 vs. United Technologies Corporation, at al.
DISTRICT 3
Adiournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3
be adjourned The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at
9:29 p.m.
-17-
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Minutes
8/28/96
DISTRICT 5
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5
be adjourned The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at
9:29 p.m.
DISTRICT 6
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6
be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:29 p.m.
DISTRICT 7 (PDC96-33)
Actions re Abandonment of Bent Tree
Cowan Heights, Derby Nos. 1 and 2. Lake
Court and Shady Canyon Pump Stations,
Contract No. 7-14-2
Approving Change Order No. 2 to the
plans and specifications
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for said project,
authorizing an addition of$5,172.00 to the contract with Clarke
Contracting Corporation for one item of additional work, be, and is
hereby, approved.
Approving Change Order No. 3 to the
plans and specifications
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications for said project,
authorizing an adjustment of engineers quantities for a total deduction of
$20,475.00 from the contract with Clarke Contracting Corporation, be,
and is hereby, approved.
-18-
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Minutes
8/28/96
Accepting Contract No. 7-14-2
as complete
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That Abandonment of Bent Tree, Cowan Heights, Derby Nos. 1 and 2,
Lake Court and Shady Canyon Pump Stations, Contract No. 7-14-2, be,
and is hereby, accepted as complete; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That execution of a Notice of Completion and
approving Final Closeout Agreement for a final total contract amount of
$629,578.27, be, and is hereby, authorized.
DISTRICT 7 (PDC96-34)
Actions re Parallel and Replacement of
Portions of Lemon Heights Subtrunk Sewer,
La Colina Drive to Newport Boulevard,
Contract No. 7-22, and Manhole Access
Modifications to RA-14 Sewer at Newport
Boulevard and Cowan Heights Drive,
Contract No. 7-24
Approving Change Order No. 2 to the
plans and specifications
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for said project,
authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a total addition of
$32,521.20 to the contract with Calfon Construction, Inc., be, and is
hereby, approved.
Accepting Contract No. 7-22 and
Contract No. 7-24 as complete
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That Parallel and Replacement of Portions of Lemon Heights Subtrunk
Sewer, La Colina Drive to Newport Boulevard, Contract No. 7-22, and
Manhole Access Modifications to RA-14 Sewer at Newport Boulevard
and Cowan Heights Drive, Contract No. 7-24, be, and is hereby,
accepted as complete; and,
-19-
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Minutes
8128/96
FURTHER MOVED: That execution of a Notice of Completion and
approving Final Closeout Agreement for a final total contract amount of
$1,637,263.39, be, and is hereby, authorized.
DISTRICT 7
Adiournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7
be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:29 p.m.
DISTRICT 11
Adiournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11
be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:29 p.m.
DISTRICT 14
Adiournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14
be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so
adjourned at 9:29 p.m.
Secretary of a ofird f Directors
of County S nit ion i ricts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, , , T1 , 13 & 14
-20-
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 07MBM PAGE 1 "
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 07/1096 POSTING DATE 07/1096
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
152945 ABB LOGISTICS CENTER $5,594.67 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
152M AT&T-MEGACOM SERVICE $3,240.89 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
152947 AT&T-PRO WATTS $939.44 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
152948 A T&T-CELLULAR CR&R $11.05 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
152949 ADAMSON INDUSTRIES $1,524.36 LAB SUPPLIES
152950 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $7.01 LAB SUPPLIES
152951 ALCO PRODUCTS INC $91.90 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
152952 ALLEN PRESS $93.25 PUBLICATIONS
152953 AMERICATA $8,237.71 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
152954 AMERICAN AIRLINES $2,797.04 TRAVEL SERVICES
162955 AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY $280.19 LAB SUPPLIES
152956 BLAKE P.ANDERSON $78.69 REIMBURSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE
152957 ANGEL SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS INC. $633.83 LAB SUPPLIES
152958 ANIXTER-DISTRIBUTION $275.87 COMPUTER SUPPLIES
152959 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $2,173.82 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
M 152980 -ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE,INC. $315.92 TOXIC WASTE REMOVAL
X 152981 AUTODESK,INC. $350.71 COMPUTER PARTS
152952 AWARDS&TROPHIES $40.92 PLAQUES
152963 BC WIRE ROPE&RIGGING $232.31 AUTO PARTS
-{ 152964 E S BABCOCK&SONS INC $1,350.00 LAB ANALYSIS
n 152965 BANANA BLUEPRINT $154.73 PRINTING M.O.11-07-94
1529M BANKOFAMERICA $156.83 BANKING SERVICES
1--' 152987 BARCLAYS LAW PUBLISHERS $149.00 PUBLICATION
152968 BATTELLE $1,800.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES NO 3-27-98
152959 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $702.53 BATTERIES
152970 BAYSHORE PSYCHOLOGY CENTER $170.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
162971 BIOMERIEUX VITEK,INC. $574.60 LAB SUPPLIES
152972 BRENNER-FIEDLER&ASSOC.,INC. $123.69 GENERATORS
152973 BRINKMANN INSTRUMENTS INC. $134.21 LAB SUPPLIES
152974 CDI I CHIP&SHORE CONTRACTING $339.41 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
152975 C.P.I. $1,395.36 LAB SUPPLIES
152976 CAD ONE,INC. $99.44 OFFICE SUPPLIES
152977 CALTROL,INC. $1,603.32 HARDWARE
152978 CALIFORNIA AUTO COLLISION,INC. $1,468.39 TRUCK BODY REPAIR
152979 CALIF CENTRIFUGAL PUMP $1.033.73 PUMP PARTS
152980 CAMAU CORP. $2.575.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
152981 CAMP DRESSER&MC KEY INC $159,398.00 CONSULTANT NO 3-27-96
152982 CARLETON ENGINEERS $130.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES-AIR QUALITY
152983 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $3,240.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES
152984 CASADA CONSTRUCTION CO $36,160.00 CONSTRUCTION
152985 CASA $160.D0 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION
152986 CENTURY SAFETY INST.&SUPPLY $5,656.88 SAFETY SUPPLIES
152987 CERTIFIED APPLIANCE CO $341.76 REPAIR OVEN
162988 CHROME CRANKSHAFT,INC. $240.00 PUMP PARTS
152989 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $302.89 SERVICE AGREEMENT
152990 COMPUTERS AMERICA $221.82 PRINTER SUPPLIES
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 07/08/96 PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 07/10/98 POSTING DATE 07/10/96
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
152991 CONNELL GM PARTS/DIV. $58.10 TRUCK PARTS
152992 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $7.305.08 ELECTRIC PARTS
152993 CONSUMER PIPE $489.65 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
152994 CONTAINER CORPORATION 7.23 $257.76 PERMIT OVERPAYMENT REFUND
152995 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $2,402.89 ENGINE PARTS
152996 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $67.28 TRUCK PARTS
152997. COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $2,818.50 ELECTRIC PARTS
152998 CPU-COMPUTER REPAIR $179.95 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
152999 CRITTER CATCHERS $45,00 RELOCATION
153000 DATA SYSTEMS SERVICE $4,123.73 SOFTWARE
153001 DAVE'S BICYCLES,INC. $40,89 BIKE REPAIRS
153002 DELL MARKETING L.P. $8,036.00 COMPUTERS
153003 DICKSONS $999.92 PUMP
153004 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $940.00 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE
153005 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $6,975.18 PAINT SUPPLIES
TT1 153006 'EMA INC $2,750.W PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
X 153007 EAGLE DISTRIBUTION $655.79 AUTO SUPPLIES
._. 153006 ELECTRA-BOND,INC. $2.532.13 REBUILD TURNTABLE
153009 ENCHANTER,INC. $3,500.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5-24-95
--j 153010 ENVIREX INC. $328.64 MECHANICAL PARTS
D 153011 FLUID TECH.SALES $214.69 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
153012 FMC CORPORATION $124,650.55 HYDROGEN PEROXIDE MO 9-14-94
N 153013 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $165.85 AIR FREIGHT
153014 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $1.181.09 FILTERS
153DIS FIRST CHOICE $379.98 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT
153016 FISHER ROSEMOUNT $1,086.49 ELECTRIC INSTRUMENT
153017 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $241.79 LAB SUPPLIES
153018 FLICKINGER CO $360.98 GAUGE
153019 TIM FOLEY $113.38 EXPENSE REIMS.
153020 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $21.99 PHOTO SUPPLIES
153021 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT 5896.71 PAINT SUPPLIES
153022 FRY'S ELECTRONICS $1,318.73 ELECTRONIC&COMPUTER SUPPLIES
153023 GST,INC. $11,825.83 OFFICE SUPPLIES
153024 GE IND&POWER SYSTEMS $2.432.68 ELECTRIC PARTS
153025 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1,108.80 TELEPHONE SERVICES
153026 GRAPHIC CONTROLS $245.19 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
153027 GRASSY S.T.I. $778.25 ENGINE PARTS
153028 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC WHOLESALE $228.23 TELEPHONE PARTS
153029 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $642.68 PRINTING
153030 DGA CONSULTANTS $11.058.50 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-6-94
153031 GRIFFIN CARRICK $19.50 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MO 9.27-95
153032 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $276.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
153033 MACH COMPANY $674.16 LAB SUPPLIES
153034 MATCH&KIRK,INC. $2,117.55 TRUCK PARTS
153035 PL HAWN CO,INC. $2,047.31 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
153036 HILTI,INC. $1,321.02 TOOLS
FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 07/08/96 PAGES
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 07/10/96 POSTING DATE 07110/98
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
153037 HOME DEPOT $153.35 SMALL HARDWARE
153038 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $1.490.41 PAINT SUPPUES
153039 HYDROPURE POOL SERVICE $1.865.00 REPAIR POND
153040 IPCO SAFETY $4,328A2 SAFETY SUPPLIES
163041 ISCO,INC. $8.620.01 INSTRUMENT
163042 IMAGING PLUS $598.95 OFFICE SUPPLIES
153043 INDUSTRIAL SAFETY SHOE CO. $2.598.37 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES _
153044 IRVINE PIPE SUPPLY $48.08 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
153045 J2 PRINTING SERVICES $890.02 PRINTING
153046 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $840.61 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
153047 JAYS CATERING $203.15 DIRECTORS MEETING EXPENSE
153048 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $76.91 ELECTRIC PARTS
1530a9 KEENAN SUPPLY $1.782.38 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
ISM50 KELAR CORPORATION $2,703.75 SOFTWARE
153051 KEMIRON PACIFIC,INC. $30,504A9 FERRIC CHLORIDE M09-27-95
153052 KEWAUNEE SCIENTIFIC CORP. $2,829.06 WORKBENCH
X 153053 KING BEARING,INC, $1.354.96 MACHINE SUPPLIES
= 153054 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $1,178.19 TOOLS
153055 KOOL TRONIC INC OF CALIF $328.81 MOTOR
�153056 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $1.129.67 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICE
~ 153057 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY CO. $1,145.25 SAFETY SUPPLIES
� 153058 WILLIAM J.LLOYD $598.50 EXPENSE REIMB.
W 153059 SOCO-LYNCH CORP. $1,105.43 JANITORIAL SERVICES
153080 MDT $578.51 LAB SUPPLIES
153061 MTA US BC $270.00 MEMBERSHIP
153062 MAG SYSTEMS $185.52 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
153063 MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY CORP. $1,022.65 TOOLS
IS3064 MANDIC MOTORS $45.00 TOWING SERVICES
153055 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $937.231.37 CONSTRUCTION Pl-36-2
153066 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $10,961.00 CONSTRUCTION P2-42-2
153067 MC FADDEN DALE HARDWARE CO $110.56 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
153D68 DONALD F.MCINTYRE $243.80 EXPENSE REIMB.
153069 MESA MUFFLER $101.46 TRUCK PARTS
153070 MISSION ABRASIVE SUPPLIES $996.69 WELDING SUPPLIES
ISW71 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3,840.58 UNIFORM RENTALS
153072 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO. $338.00 INSTRUMENT
153073 MOORE PRODUCTS CO $423.10 ELECTRIC PARTS
153074 MOTOROLA,INC. $409.45 INSTRUMENT PARTS
153075 STADARD REF.MATL PROGRAM $2,400.00 SOFTWARE
153076 NATIONAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION 5212.00 PUBLICATIONS
153077 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $1,809.42 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
153078 HOANG NGUYEN $47.66 REIMB.OVERDEDUCTION
153079 NICHOLAS CHEVROLET $96.98 AUTO REPAIR
153080 NICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY $42.28 LUBRICANTS/DIESEL FUEL
153081 OCEAN IMAGING $15.000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
153082 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $8,062.41 OFFICE SUPPLIES
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 07108M PAGE 4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 07/10/96 POSTING DATE 07/10/96
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
153083 OMNI WESTERN INC 5386.45 TOOLS
153054 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $26.56 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
153085 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. $361.52 FITTINGS
163086 COUNTY OF ORANGE $5,150.13 2-WAY RADIO SERVICES 3RD OTR
153087 PSI $195.43 HARDWARE
163080 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $1,766.20 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
153089 PACIFIC PARTS $371.45 INSTRUMENT PARTS
-153090 PACIFIC BELL $17.14 TELEPHONE SERVICES
153091 PAGENET $1,112.85 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
153092 PARAGON CABLE $36.78 CABLE SERVICES
153093 PARKER HANNIFIN CORP. $220.30 REGULATOR PARTS
153094 PEERLESS WIPING MATERIALS $721.93 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
153095 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $2.172.32 REIMB.PETTY CASH
153098 PHOTRON USA $194.00 LAB SUPPLIES
153097 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $150,124.03 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3-29-95
m 153098 POLYPURE,INC. $15,865.84 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O311-92
= 153099 PRENTICE HALL $107.47 PUBLICATION
.-i 153100 QUALITY BUILDING SUPPLY $167.44 BUILDING MATERIALS
153101 RJN GROUP,INC. $3,400.00 SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT
-� 153102 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $250.54 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS
153103 R&R INSTRUMENTS 56,045.40 ELECTRIC PARTS
nj 153104 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $2.OD2.72 TRASH REMOVAL
r 153105 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO. $156.61 LAB SUPPLIES
153106 DENNIS RASIMAS 8 $5,000.00 CLAIM SETTLEMENT NO.J-CSD-94-L-29
153107 REDWINGSHOES $118.09 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES
153108 DOLT DELIVERY $24.00 FREIGHT
153109 THE REGISTER $3,264.80 NOTICES&ADS
153110 ROSEMOUNT,INC. $684.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS
153111 ROSEMOUNT ANALYTICAL.INC. $412.02 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
153112 SAWPA $35,000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
153113 SAWS CLUB 548.49 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL
153114 SANTA FE BAG CO. $238.05 FREIGHT
153115 RICHARD SANTANGELO $282.03 EXPENSE REIMB.
153116 R.CRAIG SCOTT&ASSOC. $59.801.22 LEGAL SERVICES-PERSONNEL ISSUES
153117 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES.INC. $1,695.16 SPECIALTY GASES
153118 SEA COAST DESIGNS $900.79 LAB SUPPLIES
153119 SENSOREX INC $272.60 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
153120 SERPENTUL CONVEYOR CORP $3.264.70 PLASTIC ROLLERS
153121 STUARTSEVERN $765.37 EXPENSE REIMB,
153122 SEWER EQUIP CO OF AMERICA $452.95 ROOT CUTTER
153123 SHASTA ELECTRIC $84.074.00 CONSTRUCTION J-31-2
153124 SHURELUCK SALES $6,225.53 TOOLSAHARDWARE
153125 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO. $81.46 LAB SUPPLIES
153126 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $70.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS
153127 SMITH-EMERY CO. $648.DD SOIL TESTING M.O.7-13-94
153128 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP. $855.16 TOOLS
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 07/08/96 PAGES
REPORT NUMBERAP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 07/10/96 POSTING DATE 07110/9S
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
153129 SO COAST AIR QUALITY $2,475.20 PERMIT FEES
153130 SO COAST AIR QUALITY $195.00 PERMIT FEES
153131 SO CALIF EDISON CO $41.888.28 POWER
153132 SO CALIF EDISON CO $30,592.39 POWER
153133 SOUTHWEST SCIENTIFIC $1.293.00 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
163134 SUMMIT STEEL $088.04 METAL
153135 SUNSETFORD $149.36 TRUCK PARTS
-153136 SVER DRUP CORPORATION $202.905.00 CONSTRUCTION P2-35-3,P2d6,PI-38-5,P2-55
153137 TCH ASSOCIATES $1,636.91 LAB SUPPLIES
153138 TAKE CHARGE CONSULTANTS $27,377.15 MANAGEMENT TRAINING
153139 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $74.84 ELECTRIC CART PARTS
153140 TELEDYNE ANALYTICAL $144.58 INSTRUMENT PARTS
153141 TERRY'S CAMERA $879.18 NIKON CAMERA
153142 THOMASOWSTANLEY,INC. $346.05 MECHANICAL PARTS
153143 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $1.107.47 MECHANICAL PARTS
153144 TOSHIBA INTERNATIONAL $1,104.51 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
m 153145 TRANE $68.60 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
X
x 153146 TRANSMATION,INC. E3,321.04 INSTRUMENT PARTS
t- 153147 TRUCK 8 AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $562.98 TRUCK PARTS
153148 JG TUCKER&SON,INC. $4,565.94 INSTRUMENT PARTS
"I 153149 UNDERSEA GRAPHICS,INC. $80.81 PHOTO PRINTS FROM VIDEO
n 153150 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $18.65 PARCEL SERVICES
I 153151 VWR SCIENTIFIC $5,985.05 LAB SUPPLIES
153152 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $5.698.53 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
153153 VARIAN CHROMATOGRAPHY SYSTEMS $1,296.56 LAB SUPPLIES
153154 VERNE'S PLUMBING $875.00 PLUMBING SERVICES
153155 WACKENHUT CORP. $5,246.09 CONTRACT SERVICESECURITY GUARDS
153156 WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION $1,365.00 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT COURSES
153157 WAKIE $512.81 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
153158 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $21.283.34 CAUSTIC SODA MO 8-23-95
153159 WEST-CITE SUPPLY CO. $672.31 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
153160 ROURKE,WOODRUFF 8 SPRADLIN $74,860.42 LEGAL SERVICES MO 7-26-95
153161 XEROX CORP. $10.809.63 COPIER LEASES
153162 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $1,714.07 LAB SUPPLIES
153163 YELLOW SPRINGS INSTRUMENT CO. $289.87 LAB SUPPLIES
153164 YORK INTERNATIONAL $85.15 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 07110M $2.354.716.31
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 07/0$/98 PAGE 6
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 07/10/96 POSTING DATE 07/10/96
SUMMARY AMOUNT
92 OPER FUND $12.568.64
93 OPER FUND $41.369.05
#3 CAP FAC FUND $16.522.92
#5 OPER FUND $3.494.13
#7 OPER FUND $12,052.39
#7 CAP FAC FUND $318.50
#11 OPER FUND $720.96
#14 OPER FUND $210.00
#5&6 OPER FUND $1,540.35
#6&7 OPER FUND $3.491.48
#7&14 OPER FUND $2.816.48
JT OPER FUND $606,937.65
CORE $1,466,247.71
SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $80.530.52
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $105.895.63
m $2,354.716.31
x
x
bJ
a
m
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0723/96 PAGE 1 a
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 07/24/96 POSTING DATE 0724/96
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
153192 ABE LOGISTICS CENTER $637.85 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
153193 AT&T-PROWATTS $201.42 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
153194 AT&T-CELLULAR CR&R $8.69 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
153195 AWSI $2,594.10 D.O.T. TRAINING
153196 ABRASIVE ENG.TOOLING&EQUIP. $231.04 HARDWARE
153197 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $719.03 LAB SUPPLIES
153198 ALHAMBRA FOUNDRY CO LM $6,62&63 MANHOLE FRAMES&COVERS
153199 AMERIDATA $1,015.22 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
153200 AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY $9.92 LAB SUPPLIES
153201 AMOCO ENERGY TRADING $46.124.48 NATURAL GAS MO 6.28-95
153202 ANALYSTS INC $1,111.75 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
153203 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL $330.00 SERVICEAGREEMENT
153204 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $824.30 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
153205 AQUATIC BIOASSAY&CONSULTANTS $2,070.00 LAB SERVICES
153206 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $5,060.20 PAYROLL SERVICES
TIT 153207 - BANANA BLUEPRINT $4,393.35 PRINTING M.O.11-07-94
X 153208 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $986.65 BATTERIES
._.�153209 BAUER COMPRESSOR $201.07 COMPRESSOR PARTS
DU 153210 BAVCO $605.15 REPAIR KIT
--4 153211 BAKTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $1,940.85 LAB SUPPLIES
153212 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $850.80 TRUCK WASH TICKETS
�153213 BIOMERIELI%VITEK,INC. 5503.08 LAB SUPPLIES
r 153214 BLACK&VEATCH $11.105.60 ENGINEERING SERVICES MO 4-26-95.Pl46&P2-55
153215 BOOT BARN $118.42 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES
153216 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $327.32 ENGINEERING SERVICES 5.37-3,5-37d
153217 BRINKMANN INSTRUMENTS INC $160.07 LAB SUPPLIES
153210 BRISTOL-MEYERS SQUIBB $107.68 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
153219 BRTTHINEE ELECTRIC $877.66 ELECTRIC PARTS
153220 BROCK&ASSOCIATES $9,886.03 MANAGEMENT TRAINING
153221 BROOKS INSTRUMENT DIV. $223.73 INSTRUMENT
153222 CEM CORPORATION $17.853.08 LAB SUPPLIES
153223 CS COMPANY $3.542.47 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
153224 CAMP DRESSER&MC KEY INC $2,334.36 ENGINEERING SERVICES
153226 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $24.590.53 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-38,P243-3
153226 CARRERA CONSULTING GROUP $30,000.00 BID BOND REFUND
153227 CASA $150,00 REGISTRATION
153228 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $819,25 OFFICE FURNITURE
153229 CENTURY SAFETY MST.&SUPPLY $178.06 SAFETY SUPPLIES
153230 CERFNET $2000 COMPUTER SERVICES
153231 CHASE.ROTCHFORD,DRUKKER $918.22 LEGAL SERVICES NO 12-1 -94
153232 CLARK CONTRACTING CO $11,031,01 EMERG.REPAIR OF BENT TREE PUMP STATION
153233 CLAYTON ENVIRO CONSULT $11,505,00 INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE SERVICES
153234 COMMUNICATION PERFORMANCE GROUP $17,90000 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MO 10-25.95
153235 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $%52&06 PUMP PARTS
153236 COMPUTER LIBRARY $2,580.61 SUBSCRIPTION
153237 CONNELL GM PARTS/DIV. $174.59 TRUCK PARTS
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0723196 PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 0724MS POSTING DATE 0724M
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
153238 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $2,391.55 ELECTRIC PARTS
153239 CONSOLIDATED FREIGHIWAYS $11058.50 FREIGHT
153240 CONSOLIDATED REPROGRAPHICS $703.93 PRINTING SERVICES
153241 CONTINENTAL GRAPHICS $78.87 PRINTING
153242 DOUG COOK $1,048.D3 EXPENSE REIMB.
IS3243 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $3,218.13 ENGINE PARTS
153244 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $500.32 TRUCK PARTS
153245 COUNTERPART ENTERPRISES $64.74 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
153246 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $5,598.78 ELECTRIC PARTS
153247 CUSTOM CELLULAR $1,287.53 PORTABLE FACSIMILE KIT
153248 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $32,734.00 1995-96 SALES TAX
153249 DCC I CAL INC $184.25 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
153250 ALBERT W DAVIES INC 522,039.05 CONSTRUCTION 3-36R
1632SI DE GUELLE&SONS GLASS CO $145.26 SAFETY GLASS
153252 DELL MARKETING L.P. $23,447.48 COMPUTERS
M 153253 -CEL MAR ANALYTICAL $760.00 BIOSOLIDS ANALYSIS
X 153254 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIF. $36,632.29 DENTAL INSURANCE PLAN MO.1-12.94
._+ 153255 DIAMOND LINERS INC $775.34 TRUCK BED LINERS
153250 DIVERSIFIED INSPECTION $522.00 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
.� 153257 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $2.406.28 PAINT SUPPLIES
153258 ELECTRICAL INSULATION $109.71 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
153259 ENCHANTER,INC. S2.1D0.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5.24-95
N 153260 DARRELL ENNIS $136.55 EXPENSE REIMB.
153261 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $1,011.60 LAB SERVICES
153262 EXIDE ELECTRONICS $2,724.22 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
153263 EXPRESS SYSTEMS INC. $2.924.50 SOFTWARE
153264 FLUID TECH.SALES $1,386.98 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
153265 FASTFRAME OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $108.83 AWARDS FRAMING
153266 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $475.70 AIR FREIGHT
153267 FILTER SUPPLY CO. 55,129.83 FILTERS
153268 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $2,386.62 LAB SUPPLIES
153259 FISONS INSTRUMENTS $7,579.25 SERVICE AGREEMENT
153270 FLOSYSTEMS $9.577.30 PUMP PARTS
153271 FORKERT ENGINEERING B SURVEY $4.605.05 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES M06A-94
IS3272 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $40.33 PHOTO SUPPLIES
153273 FRYS ELECTRONICS $830.52 ELECTRONIC 8 COMPUTER SUPPLIES
153274 CITY OF FULLERTON $39.30 WATER USE
153275 FURON CO. $59.24 FREIGHT
153276 GST,INC. $1,307.28 OFFICE SUPPLIES
1532T7 GENERAL PETROLEUM $21.009.17 PREIMIUM UNLEADED GASOLINE
153270 GIERUCH-MTTCHELL,INC. $19,537.44 PUMP PARTS
163279 W W GRAINGER.INC. $80.25 COMPRESSOR PARTS
153280 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $240.24 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
153261 GRASSY S.T.I. $1.102.25 ENGINE PARTS
153202 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $1,169.91 PRINTING
153283 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $1,000.53 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 07/23/96 PAGE 3
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 07124M POSTING DATE 07/24/98
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
153284 HATCH&KIRK,INC. $20.84 TRUCK PARTS
153285 PL HAWN CO,INC. $1,837.49 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
153286 HILTI,INC. $1,437.28 TOOLS
153287 HI STANDARD AUTOMOTIVE $1,352.25 TRUCK PARTS
153288 RC HOFFMAN AND/OR ISCO $368.69 LAB SUPPLIES
1$3289 HOFFMAN SOUTHWEST $840.00 VIDEO SEWER INSPECTION
153290 HOME DEPOT $160.41 SMALL HARDWARE
953291 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $11,185.76 WATER USE
153292 IPCO SAFETY $5,638.89 SAFETY SUPPLIES
153293 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $4,294.89 CONNECTORS
153294 INORGANIC VENTURES $252.28 LAB SUPPLIES
153295 INTELLIGENCE PRESS,INC. $825.00 SUBSCRIPTION
153296 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $684.70 BATTERIES
153297 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $5.54 WATER USE
153298 JP MORGAN SECURITIES $23.371.57 COP REMARKETING AGREEMENT
153299 JAMISON ENGINEERING $16,718.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
Q 153300 DEE JASPAR&ASSOC. $5,260.61 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
153301 JAYS CATERING $586.84 DIRECTORS MEETING EXPENSE
2
153302 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $1,598.01 ELECTRIC PARTS
153303 JONES CHEMICALS,INC. $2,067.63 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE MO 4-26.95
-I 153304 KEENAN SUPPLY $1,092.22 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
Qy 153305 KEMIRON PACIFIC,INC. $113,595.39 FERRIC CHLORIDE MO 9-27-95
I 153306 KING BEARING,INC. $10188.12 MACHINE SUPPLIES
W 153307 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $7.289.37 TOOLS
153308 LASHER DODGE $16.549.32 TRUCK
153309 LEG$-TECH $3,840.00 COMPUTER SERVICES
153310 LEE&RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC. $27.931.68 ENGINEERING SERVICES
153311 LIEBERT CORPORATION $24,126.00 ELECTRIC PARTS
153312 K.P.LINDSTROM,INC. $1,125.00 ENVIR.CONSULTING SERVICES MO 12-9.90
153313 LOS ANGELES TIMES $176.04 SUBSCRIPTION
153314 MDT BIOLOGIC COMPANY $938.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
153315 MPS $901.54 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
153316 MANHOLE ADJUSTING $4,125.00 ADJUST MANHOLE FRAMES B COVERS
153317 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $139.91 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
153318 G R MCKERVEY $9.446.19 EMERGENCY REPAIR ON SUNFLOWER TRUNK
153319 MICROBICS CORPORATION $636.14 LAB SUPPLIES
153320 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3,100.54 UNIFORM RENTALS
153321 MONTEREY HYATT REGENCY $137.50 CASA REGISTRATION
153322 MONTEREY QUALITY CONFERENCE $195.00 CASA REGISTRATION
153323 MORELAND&ASSOCIATES $2,189.00 AUDITING SERVICES MO 3-8-95
153324 MOTOROLA,INC. $33,198.21 INSTRUMENT PARTS
153325 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES $45,094.44 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES
153326 G ROBERT NEASE PHOTOGRAPHY $4,599.00 BROCHURE PHOTOS
153327 NETWORK GENERAL CORP. $2,250.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
153328 NEUTRON $5.939.14 ANIONIC POLYMER M.O.6.10.94
153329 NORCO DELIVERY SERVICE $98.20 MAIL DELIVERY SERVICE
FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 07/23196 PAGE4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 07124/96 POSTING DATE 07/24M
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
153330 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $488.54 SAFETY GLASSES
153331 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $276.54 OFFICE SUPPLIES
153332 OMNI WESTERN INC $1,375.63 TOOLS
153333 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $2,023.44 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
153334 ORANGE COURIER $89.10 COURIER SERVICES
IS3335 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. $1,786.94 FITTINGS
153336. ORTIZ FIRE PROTECTION $2.209.00 SPRINKLER SYSTEM REPAIR
153337 OXYGEN SERVICE $2,606.34 SPECIALTY GASES
153338 COUNTY OF ORANGE $4.747.50 MUNICIPAL RADIO SERVICES
153339 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $9.346.99 WORKERS COMP.REIMB.
153340 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT $37,700.40 GAP WATER USE M.0.6-9-93
153341 P&D CONSULTANTS INC $1.794.44 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
153342 PSOC(POOL SUPPLY OF OC) $99.32 OPERATING SUPPLIES
153343 PSSI $4.550,80 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION
153344 PACIFIC PARTS $304.69 INSTRUMENT PARTS
m 153345 PADRE JANITORIAL SUPPLY $158.93 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
X 153348 PAGENET $675.87 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
X—153347 PARKER HANNIFIN CORP. $65,17 FILTER REGULATOR
Lb 153348 PARKHOUSE TIRE,INC. $372.51 TIRES
153349 PARTS UNLIMITED $318.22 TRUCK PARTS
153350 PEEK MEASUREMENT $5.983.00 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
153351 PEABODY $108.99 PUMP PARTS
F 153352 PERSONNEL POLICY SERVICE INC $397.00 PUBLICATION
153353 PERVO PAINT $77.58 PAINT
153354 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $497.39 REIMB.PETTY GASH
153355 PIMA GIRD SYSTEMS,INC. $102.980.70 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3.211-95
153356 PITNEY BOWES $306.55 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
153357 U.S.FILTER AND/OR $1.262.75 LAB SUPPLIES
153358 POLYPURE,INC. $28,19T47 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92
153359 POSITIVE FORMULATORS,INC. $261.76 CHEMICALS
153360 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $176.00 ICE FOR SAMPLES
153361 PRODUCTION,CONSULTING&CONST $88.90 PUBUCATION
153362 PULSAFEEDER $353.85 PUMP PARTS
153363 QUICKSTART TECHNOLOGIES $6,375.00 SOFTWARE CONSULTANT
153364 R&R INSTRUMENTS $1,165.35 ELECTRIC PARTS
153365 RED WING SHOES 598.27 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES
153368 MCJUNKIN CORPORATION $1.068.68 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
153367 RONAN ENGINEERING CO $363.56 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
153368 ROSEN'S ELECTRIC $1,117.54 ELECTRIC SUPPUES
153369 ROYCE PRODUCTIONS $1.000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
153370 SARBS-CWEA-PDC,INC. $1,30O00 REGISTRATION
153371 R.CRAIG SCOTT&ASSOC. $1.457,60 LEGAL SERVICES-PERSONNEL ISSUES
153372 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $146.34 SPECIALTY GASES
153373 SEA COAST DESIGNS $4.982.37 LAB SUPPLIES
153374 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $1.977.07 TOOLS
153375 SHURELUCK SALES $57.05 TOOLSIHARDWARE
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0723M PAGE 5 '
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 0724196 POSTING DATE 0724IN
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
153376 SIEVERS INSTRUMENTS INC. $395.34 LAB SUPPLIES
153377 SMITH-EMERY CO. $4.427.50 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-13-94
153378 SO COAST AIR QUALITY $665.50 PERMIT FEES
153379 SO COAST AIR QUALITY $686.97 PERMIT FEES
153380 SO CALIF EDISON CO $51.195.64 POWER
153381 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $20,955.11 NATURAL GAS
153382 SO.CALIFORNIA MARINE INST. $800.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
153383 SO.CALIF.WATER CO. $55.28 WATER USE
153384 STANDARD SUPP&EQUIP CO $297.03 MECHANICAL PARTS
153385 STATE STREET BANK $3,500.00 COP TRUSTEE SERVICES
153386 STROMBERG PRODUCTS $568.42 OFFICE SUPPLIES
153387 SUMMIT STEEL $2,816.15 METAL
153358 SUPELCO,INC. $253.51 LAB SUPPLIES
153389 TRW-REDI $666.11 PARCEL DATA
153390 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $874.26 ELECTRIC CART PARTS
M 153391 TECHNOMIC PUBLISHING CO IN $55.00 PUBLICATION
X 153392 TEXAS COMMERCE BANK $6,692.21 COP TRUSTEE SERVICES
�153393 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $5.060.71 MECHANICAL PARTS
W 153394 TIME MOTION TOOLS $75.87 MULTIMETER
-1153395 TIME WARNER COMMUNICATIONS $36.78 CABLE SERVICES
163396 TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY,INC. $6,441.00 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.O.&11.94
t"153397 TRUCK B AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $656.95 TRUCK PARTS
In 153398 JG TUCKER 8 SON,INC. $149.70 INSTRUMENT PARTS
153399 MICHELLE TUCHMAN $674.03 EXPENSE REIMB.
153400 TUSTIN DODGE $22.55 TRUCK PARTS
153401 TWINING LABORATORIES $247.35 SOIL TESTING M.O.7.13.94
153402 U.S.AUTO GLASS CENTERS $79.74 TRUCK PARTS
153403 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $296.00 LAB SUPPLIES
1534M UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $45.82 PARCEL SERVICES
153405 DATAVAULT I US SAFE DEPOSIT CO $94.00 BACK-UP TAPE STORAGE
153406 VWR SCIENTIFIC $8.884.05 LAB SUPPLIES
153407 VALLEY DEiTROIT DIESEL $8,316.95 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
153408 VALVATE ASSOCIATES $284A0 VALVES
153409 VANIER BUSINESS FORMS $1,456.79 OFFICE SUPPLIES
153410 VARIAN CHROMATOGRAPHY SYS $342.36 LAB SUPPLIES
153411 VERTEX TECHNOLOGIES,INC. $539.71 FIBER OPTICS
153412 V 8 E TREE SERVICE INC. $14.975.00 GROUNDSKEEPING
153413 VILLAGE NURSERIES $88.18 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES
153414 WACKENHUT CORP. $8,364.84 CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS
153415 WAL-CON CONSTRUCTION CO. $46,834.67 CONSTRUCTION&37-3
153416 WASTE MARKETS $12,049.54 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 3.27-96
153417 THE WASTEWATER CONNECTION $684.71 MANHOLE COVER REMOVER
153418 WEST COAST INSTRUMENTS $264.T7 GAUGE
15309 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $20.929.76 CAUSTIC SODA MO&23.95
153420 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $24,077.00 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE MO4-24-96
153421 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $1,379.94 MURIATIC ACID MO 3.27-96
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 07123MO PAGES
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 0724/88 POSTING DATE 0724196
WARRANTNO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
153422 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $1,009.12 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
153423 WESCO DISTRIBUTION INC. $517.20 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
153424 NANCY WHEATLEY $481.31 EXPENSE REIMS.
153425 ROURKE,WOODRUFF&SPRADLIN $58.982.89 LEGAL SERVICES NO 7-26-95
153426 XEROX CORP. $7.480.56 COPIER LEASES
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 0724M $1,411.649.28
SUMMARY AMOUNT
#1 OPER FUND $593.60
#1 CONST FUND $2,727.93
#2 OPER FUND $15.456.62
m - #2 CAP FAC FUND $1,794.44
X 02 CONST FUND $7.502.31
2 #3 OPER FUND $22,260.15
#3 CAP FAC FUND $36,256.85
#3 CONST FUND $9.139.02
#5 OPER FUND $4.939.46
to #6 OPER FUND $244.93
#6 CONST FUND $1.909.87
#7 OPER FUND $46.236.07
07 CAP FAC FUND $152.63
07 CONST FUND $2.045.86
611 OPER FUND $3,123.01
#11 CAP FAC FUND $14.979.75
#11 CONST FUND $3.545.58
#14 OPER FUND $297.50 _
0586 OPER FUND $9.69
#588 CAP FAC FUND $47.172.98
JT OPER FUND $747,662.51
CORP $217.567.50
SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $53,010.30
,IT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $173,119.71
$1.411.649.28
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE-VARIOUS PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID-MISCELLANEOUS HANDWRITE WARRANTS
WARRANTDATE WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
07/11/96 153165 JAMES CONG $1.131.34 EXPENSE REIMB.
07/11/96 153166 KERRY CONSULTING GROUP $10,364A2 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MO I1-15.95
07/17/96 153185 CITYOFANAHEIM $282.00 BUSINESS LICENSE
07/17/96 153186 CITY OF ANAHEIM $728.00 ENCROACHMENT PERMIT
07/17/96 153187 CALIF SOCIETY OF MUNICIPAL $40.00 CSMFO LUNCHEON
07117I98 153188 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION $359.99 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK FEE
07/17/96 153189 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $205.00 BUSINESS LICENSE
07117/96 153190 CITY OF WESTMINSTER $160.00 BUSINESS LICENSE
07/22/96 153191 CASA $185.00 CASA REGISTRATION
m 0725MG 153427 ROBERT F.DRIVER ASSOC $1,239.450.50 RISK PROPERTY&EARTHQUAKE INSURANCE NO 6-26-96
x
x 0726/98 153428 MORELAND BASSOCVITE3 $1,735.00 AUDIT SERVICES MO 3-8-95
07I30/96 153437 ROURKE 8 WOODRUFF 8 SPRADLIN $20.000.00 LEGAL SERVICES MO 7-26-95
h+ 08/08/96 153736 THE BALBOA SAY CLUB $3.314.70 NEWPORT SPILL CLAIM
OB/OB/96 153737 JOHN COLLINS $700.00 CASA CASH ADVANCE
08/08/95 153738 JOHN C.COX.JR. $700.00 CASA CASH ADVANCE
I 08/08196 153739 JAN DEBAY $700.00 CASA CASH ADVANCE
08/08196 153740 TAKE CHARGE CONSULTANTS $26,777.15 MANAGEMENT TRAINING
08/09/96 153741 SEBASTIANO SERRANTINO $1,714.00 SETTLEMENT
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID $1,308.546.80
SUMMARY AMOUNT
JT OPER FUND $51,378.48
CORF $10.364.12
SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $1,244,47920
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $2.325.00
$1,305.546.80
v AGENDA
s
v" ITEM
TRANSMITTAL
MEETING DATE NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION (Initials of Originator)
OMrs:
PDC:
FAHR: 2220/Bill Aldridge/2552
EXEC. All
m
STEER: � � oNision No..Name,and EHenslan
JT.BDS:0925M
AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
Agenda Wording:
RATIFYING PAYMENT OF CLAIMS OF THE JOINT AND INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS BY ROLL CALL VOTE
(each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented
unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District).
Recommended Action(s):
Staff recommends approval of payment of claims/warrant listing
CEQA REVIEW: Project is Exempt: NOT APPLICABLE DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM:
Date Notice of Ex mptiam Filed:
Negative Declaration Approved on N/A
Final EIR Approved on_and Notice of Determination filed on
BUDGET INFORMATION CURRENT YEAR CURRENTYEAR- YEAR-TOAATE REVISED BUDGET
TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.: $ BUDGET AMOUNT TO-DATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL
SOURCE: DISTRICTS EXPENDITURES 1.1ftYadelu.T—de.1
Schedule/Une Item:
AMOUNT OF TRANSFER:
Schedus/1-1 a Uem:
ARIPROJECT COST INFORMATION ORIGINAL BID,PO, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED PROJECT
CONTRACT FUNDS PREV. REQUESTED THIS AMOUNT
AMOUNT APPROVED AR
WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? NOTAPPLICABLE
If YES,state number: PemaneM LoniftedlTenon IfYES,explain in ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section
Cq-RWRRENCES: {,, ATTACHMENTS TO AGENDA(List)
N
KX ' /Ld . ' H To Committee: 1.
g at a Date
Divi n ana er r
rature Date To JL Bills.: 1. Warrant Usting
epartment kZd(Or Designee)
Signature Date
Assistant General Manager(Or Designee)
r
Y
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION(Bwkgmnd arM/or Summary)
PK:Ig
c: Department Head
AGM-Administra0on
AGM-Operations
General Manager
J:\W PDOCIAGENDA W ITSSBISEP\WARRANT.LST
Page 2 of 2
ReNabn: 8Q&95
FUND NO 9199 - Jr DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 08/20/95 PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID O6/21M POSTING DATE 08/21/96
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
153767 ACWA $150.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING
153768 API/ROMA INC $7.540.00 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
153769 ARMA INTERNATIONAL $585.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
153770 A T&T-CELLULAR CR&R $14.08 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
153771 A T&T-CELLULAR CR&R $4.71 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
153772 AWUVAANOT CONFERENCE $80.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING
153773 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $36.657.56 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.O.8-9-89
153774 AKCENT $50.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
153775 AMERIDATA $26.721.98 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
153776 AMERICAN PAYROLL ASSOC. $590.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
153777 AMER.SOCIETY FOR MICROBIOLOGY $519.00 PUBLICATION
153778 BLAKE P.ANDERSON $91.83 REIMBURSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE
153779 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $641.52 NOTICES&ADS
163780 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT $1.071.13 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
153781 ATKINIJONES COMPUTER SERVICE 5321.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT
153782 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $3,695.15 PAYROLL SERVICES
153783 AWARDS&TROPHIES $25.17 PLAQUES
153784 BFI MEDICAL WASTE SYSTEMS $47.40 WASTE DISPOSAL
163785 E S BABCOCK&SONS INC $270.00 LAB ANALYSIS
153785 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $373.35 BATTERIES
153787 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $422.00 TRUCK WASH TICKETS
153788 BIO-GRO DIVISION $69.991.63 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 4-26-95
153789 BOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE $45.00 TRUCK REPAIRS
153790 BON-A-RUES $180.55 TRUCK PARTS
163791 BOOT BARN $312.16 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES
153792 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $53,309.97 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-10
153793 BOZNANSKI&CO.,INC. $4,500.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
153794 BUSH&ASSOCIATES,INC. $8,311.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-8-94
153795 MICROBAC LABORATORIES,INC. $360.00 CONTRACT SERVICE
153796 CS COMPANY $64.39 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
153797 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $859.13 SERVICE AGREEMENT
153798 CALIF CENTRIFUGAL PUMP $1,050.00 PUMP PARTS
153799 CALIFORNIA LABORATORIES&DEV $4.372.25 MAINTENANCE
153800 CALIF RELOCATION SERVICES $209.00 RELOCATION
153801 CAMAU CORP. $1,300.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
153802 CANUS CORPORATION $5,200.00 FIBER OPTIC CABLE
153803 CAROLLO ENGINEERS $107.323.19 ENGINEERING SER. M.O.5.12-93,3.27-96,5-24-95,8.23.95
153804 CASA $9.000.00 MEMBERSHIP FEES
153805 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. S2.219.08 OFFICE FURNITURE
1538M CERFNET $20.00 COMPUTER SERVICES
153B07 CETAC TECHNOLOGIES,INC. $284.65 LAB SUPPLIES
153808 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $155.39 SERVICE AGREEMENT
153809 COAST TRANSMISSION $200.35 AUTO SUPPLY
153810 COUCH&SONS $141,182.00 CONSTRUCTION 11-17-1
153811 COMPUSERVE $187.42 COMPUTER SERVICES
153812 CONNELL GM PARTS/DIV. $217.77 TRUCK PARTS
FUND NO 9199 - H DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0820/96 PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 0821/98 POSTING DATE 0821/95
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
153813 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $1.408.78 ELECTRIC PARTS
153814 CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS $490.03 FREIGHT
153815 CONSUMER PIPE $3&47 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
153816 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $1,684.32 ENGINE PARTS
153817 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $134.27 TRUCK PARTS
153818 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $211.45 ELECTRIC PARTS
153819 CRANE PRO SERVICES $3,248.72 CRANE REPAIR
153820 CAL STATE UNIV FULLERTON $250.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
153821 DCC/CAL INC $1,196.03 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
153822 J.W.D'ANGELO CO.,INC. $146.36 BUILDING MATERIALS
153823 DAY TIMERS INC. $32.85 SUBSCRIPTIONS
153824 DE GUELLE&SONS GLASS CO $510.65 SAFETY GLASS
153825 DELL MARKETING L.P. $3.232.50 COMPUTER
153826 DELMARANALYTICAL $380.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
153827 DELTA PACKAGING PRODUGTSJNC. $154.30 LAB SUPPLIES
163828 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $1,011.22 PAINT SUPPLIES
153529 ESP NORTH $1,062.27 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
153830 EDWARDS DIV.OF GS BLDG SYS. $2,721.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
153831 ELECTRA-BOND,INC. $1,59T39 ROLLER BRACKET REPAIR
153832 EMERGENCY MGMT NETWORK $2,405.00 CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING
153833 ENCHANTER,INC. $3,500.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5-24-95
153834 FLUID TECH.SALES 5845.39 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
153835 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $346.25 AIR FREIGHT
153836 THE FEED BARN $627.97 BREAK AREA FURNITURE
153837 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $1,181.31 FILTERS
153838 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $1,135.27 LAB SUPPLIES
153839 FLOSYSTEMS $202.69 PUMP PARTS
153840 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $43.63 PHOTO SUPPLIES
153841 FRAZEE PAINT&WALLCOVERING $97.75 PAINT SUPPLIES
153842 FRV'S ELECTRONICS $2,73B.82 ELECTRONIC&COMPUTER SUPPLIES
163843 GST,INC. $1,199.38 OFFICE SUPPLIES
153844 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $1,770.33 CHEMICALS
153645 GE IND&POWER SYSTEMS $3.790.14 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
153946 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $5,680.65 TELEPHONE SERVICES
153847 THOMAS GRAY&ASSOC INC $624.00 LAB SERVICES
163848 DGA CONSULTANTS $1,366.00 ENGINEERING SER.M.O.6.8-94
153849 GRIFFIN CARRICK $9.128.06 LEGAL SERVICES-TECHITE M.G.9-27-95
153850 HLO&ASSOC. $7,600.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
163861 HS TYPE&GRAPHICS $592.95 PRINTING
153852 PETER HASS $740.25 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
153853 HATCH&KIRK,INC. $39.16 TRUCK PARTS
153854 MIKE HERRERA $250.00 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
153855 HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT $2,083.33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN.
153856 HOLMES&NARVER,INC. $11,253.97 ENGINEERING SERVICES Pid4
153857 HOME DEPOT $154.01 SMALL HARDWARE
153858 JILL HOWARD $638.20 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 08/20/96 PAGE 3 '
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 0821M POSTING DATE 0821196
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
153859 PIS HUGHES CO,INC. $81.77 PAINT SUPPLIES
153860 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $15.77 WATER USE
153861 HUNTINGTON AMC/JEEP/RENAULT $32.33 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS
15386E HUNPS FINAL PHASE $SW.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
153863 HYCLONE LABORATORIES $574.53 LAB SUPPLIES
153864 IPCO SAFETY $14.706.55 SAFETY SUPPLIES
153865 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $571.97 CONNECTORS
153866 INDUSTRIAL WASTE $39.00 SUBSCRIPTION
153867 INGERSOLL-RAND EQUIP CORP $12,068.00 COMPRESSOR
163868 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. $408.23 TRUCK PARTS
153869 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $41.59 WATER USE
153870 JAMISON ENGINEERING $2,083.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
163871 JAYS CATERING $1,369.06 DIRECTORS MEETING EXPENSE
153872 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $70.23 ELECTRIC PARTS
153873 KABSARA ENGINEERING $962.58 ENGINEERING SERVICE
153874 KEMIRON PACIFIC,INC. $47.711.74 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.9.27-95
153875 KERRY CONSULTING GROUP $4,102.95 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES M.O. 11-15.95
153876 KING BEARING,INC. $142.89 MACHINE SUPPLIES
153877 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $1,719.72 TOOLS
ISM78 LA MOTTE CHEMICAL PRODUCTS $90.68 CHEMICALS
153879 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY CO. $108.01 SAFETY SUPPLIES
153880 LAMSON CORPORATION $214.62 FILTER
153881 LEE&RO CONSULTING ENGR. $32,402.67 ENGINEERING SERVICES M.O.5.24-95,512-93,12-8-93
153882 CHARLES G.LEE $295.93 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
153083 LEWELLYN TECHNOLOGY,INC. $1,000.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
153884 LIMITORQUE CORP. $1,594.76 ELECTRIC PARTS
153985 K.P.LINDSTROM,INC. $10,286.32 ENVIR.CONSULTING SERVICES MO 12.9.90
153886 LOVE AT FIRST BITE B CO. $241.76 CATERING
153887 LYLE SCREENPRINTING $38.79 PICNIC EXPENSE
153888 MPS 5288.33 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
153889 MAG SYSTEMS $345.82 INSTRUMENT PARTS
153890 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS,INC. $482.81 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
153891 MAMCO INTERNATIONAL $506.86 JANITORAL SUPPLIES
153892 HARDEN SUSCO INC. $732.16 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
153893 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $46,694.03 CONSTRUCTION P2-42-2
153894 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $142.19 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
153895 MATT-CHLOR,INC. $944.46 FERRIC CHLORIDE SUPPLIES
153896 MCGARRY CENTRAL BUSINESS PROD $1,426.00 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
153897 DONALD F.MCINTYRE $107.20 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
153898 MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. $421.05 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
153899 MES COMPANY $988.07 REBUILD ROLLER BELT
163900 MINNESOTA WESTERN VISUAL PRIES. $55S6 LAB SUPPLIES
163901 MISSION ABRASIVE SUPPLIES $478.41 WELDING SUPPLIES
153902 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3,367.95 UNIFORM RENTALS
153903 PETE MORRISON $855.23 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
153904 MORTON SALT $536.95 BOILER CONDITIONING
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE OMOIN PAGE4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 0821196 POSTING DATE 0821198
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
153905 NEWPORT EXTERMINATION $2,700.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
153906 NICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY $6,522.83 LUBRICANTSIDIESEL FUEL
153907 NORCO DELIVERY SERVICE $98.20 MAIL DELIVERY SERVICE
153908 DAG FLIGHTDISK $1.044.54 SOFTWARE
153909 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $276.54 SAFETY GLASSES
153910 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $2,472.69 OFFICE SUPPLIES
153911 OMNI WESTERN INC. $12.81 HAND TOOLS
153912 ROBERTJ.00TON $776.23 MANAGEMENT TRAINING
153913 OPERATION TECHNOLOGY,INC. $1,806.47 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
153914 THE ORANGE COUNTY FORUM $80.00 MEMBERSHIP
153915 ORANGE COUNTY SEPTIC SERV. $3.172.00 PIPE REPAIR
153918 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $651.51 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
153917 ORTIZ FIRE PROTECTION $4.300.52 FIRE SPRINKLER REPAIR
153918 OXYGEN SERVICE $2,972.42 SPECIALTY GASES
153919 COUNTY OF ORANGE $65,000.00 DEPOSIT,AGREEMENT D9S107
153920 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $17.915.25 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP
163921 OCEMA $13,650.00 ENGINEERING SERVICE M.O.5-22-96
153922 PSI $567.07 STEAM CLEANING SERVICES
153923 PS51 $2,698.20 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION
153924 PACIFIC INVESTMENT MGMT CO. $123.493.00 INVESTMENT MGMT.SERVICE RESOL.95-75
153925 PACIFIC PARTS $607.60 INSTRUMENT PARTS
163925 PACIFIC BELL $77.05 TELEPHONE SERVICES
153927 PACIFIC ENERGY ASSOC.,INC. $300.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
153928 PADRE JANITORIAL SUPPLY $554.64 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
153929 PAPER SHOWCASE $24.95 TRAINING SUPPLIES
153930 PARTS UNLIMITED $112.41 TRUCK PARTS
153931 PEDERSON COMMUNICATIONS $875.00 CABLE REPLACEMENT
163932 PERFORMANCE ANALYTICAL $545.00 LAB SERVICE
153933 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $1,008.01 REIMS.PETTY CASH
153934 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $113,667.30 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3-29-95
153935 POLYPURE,INC. $49,417.35 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92
153938 PONTON INDUSTRIES,INC. $18,140.56 METERS
153937 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $20&00 ICE FOR SAMPLES
163938 PROMINENT FLUID CONTROL,INC. $2,397.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL
153939 PRYOR RESOURCES,INC. $345.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
153940 PYRAMID FENCE COMPANY $723.00 FENCING INSTALLATION
153941 QUICKSTART TECHNOLOGIES $3,675.00 SOFTWARE
153942 R&R INSTRUMENTS $64.19 ELECTRIC PARTS
153943 REAL TIME SYSTEMS CDR $2.216.00 METER REPAIR
163944 REDWINGSHOES $282.73 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES
153945 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DIST $279.53 ELECTRIC MOTOR
153946 THE REGISTER $1,975.20 NOTICES&ADS
153947 ROSEMOUNT ANALYTICAL,INC. $1.337.98 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
153946 S&J CHEVROLET $182.86 TRUCK REPAIRS
153949 SAWPA 535,000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
153950 SARBS-PDC $200.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE O820/96 PAGE 5
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 082126 POSTING DATE 0521/96
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
153951 SANTA ANA RIVER FLOOD $1,100.00 MEMBERSHIP
153952 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $110.40 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
153953 SARATOGA INSTITUTE,INC. $963.20 PUBLICATION
153954 SEA COAST DESIGNS $1,170.63 LAB SUPPLIES
153955 CITY OF SEAL BEACH $202.90 WATER USE
163956 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $732.70 TOOLS
153957 SHURELUCK SALES $2,250.53 TOOLSMARDWARE
153958 MIKE SILBERMANN EQUIP RENTAL $22,900.00 SEWER REPAIR
153959 SMITH-EMERY CO. $2.155.50 SOIL TESTING M.O1A3,94
153960 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP. $970.78 TOOLS
153961 SO CO AIR QUAL MAN DIST $4,940.00 CARS EMISSION FEES
153962 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY $32.580.68 ANNUAL EMMISSIONS FEES M.O.6-26-96
153963 SOUTH COAST WATER $125.00 LAB SUPPLIES
153964 SO CALIF EDISON CO $58.040.37 POWER
153M SO.CAL GAS.CO. $481.45 NATURAL GAS
163966 SPEK CERTIPREP INC. $326.37 LAB SUPPLIES
153967 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION $350.00 UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE FEE
153988 SUMMIT STEEL $402.56 METAL
153969 SUNSET FORD $174.97 TRUCK PARTS
153970 SUPER POWER PRODUCTS $538.75 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
163971 SVERDRUP CIVIL,INC. $360,578.20 CONSTRUCTION P2-3",P1-38-5,P2.46,P2-55
153972 T&C INDUSTRIAL CONTROLS $1,830.70 ELECTRONIC PARTS
153973 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $1,405.34 ELECTRIC CART PARTS
153974 TAYLOR INDUSTRIAL SOFTWARE $4.850.00 SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE
153975 THINK EARTH ENVIR ED.FOUND. $7.000.00 MEMBERSHIP
153976 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $1,385.16 MECHANICAL PARTS
153977 TONER SYSTEM INTERNATIONAL 52,803A9 PRINTER SUPPLIES
153978 TRANSCAT $694.93 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
153979 TRUCK S AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $794.14 TRUCK PARTS
153980 JG TUCKER S SON,INC. $127.02 INSTRUMENT PARTS
153981 UNISPEC ENGINEERING $6.709.63 CONTROL SUPPLIES
153982 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $566.93 PARCEL SERVICES
153983 VWR SCIENTIFIC $7,454.29 LAB SUPPLIES
1539M VALVATE ASSOCIATES $386.21 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
153985 VISION ENVIRO SERVICES,INC. $91989.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICE J-11-1-A
153986 WAL-CON CONSTRUCTION CO. $7.119.30 CONSTRUCTION 5.37-3
153987 WARREN GORHAM 8 LAMONT INC. $196.75 SUBSCRIPTION
153988 THE WASTEWATER CONNECTION $14,093.70 HERBICIDE
153989 WESTERN AIR $6.712.39 ENGINEERING SERVICE
153990 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $29,144.20 CAUSTIC SODA MO 8-23-95
153991 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL INC. $10,693.13 SODIUM HYPOCHLORTTE M.O.4-24-98
153992 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL $1,214.27 MURIATIC ACID RES.A9&32
163993 XEROX CORP. $1,002.08 COPIER LEASES
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 0821/96 $1,833.903.64
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE O8/20/96 PAGES
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID O8/21/96 POSTING DATE 08/21/96
SUMMARY AMOUNT
#2 OPER FUND $1,140.34
#2 CAP FAC FUND $962.58
#3 OPER FUND $10,785.76
#3 CAP FAC FUND $9.368.06
#5 OPER FUND $273.28
97 OPER FUND $42,494.17
07 CAP FAC FUND $108,309.97
#11 OPER FUND $7.966.20
911 CAP FAC FUND $152.982.24
#5&6 CAP FAC FUND $8.859.30
#7&14 OPER FUND $14.76
JT OPER FUND $523,972.97
CORF $704,668.80
SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $19,998.59
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $242.106.62
$1,833,903.64
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 08/05/98 PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID ON07196 POSTING DATE O8/07/96
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
153438 AM BEST COMPANY $112.31 PUBLICATION
153439 AT&T-PROWATTS $2,911.88 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
153440 AT&T-MEGACOM SERVICE $939.44 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
153441 AT&T-CELLULARCR&R $12.60 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
153442 AT&T-CELLULARCR&R $1.26 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
153443 ABRASIVE ENG.TOOLING&EQUIP. $459.58 HARDWARE
153444 ACCU STANDARD $133.09 LAB SUPPLIES
153445 ADAMSON INDUSTRIES $02.41 LAB SUPPLIES
153446 AGSON INC. $109.50 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
153447 AIR LIQUIDE AMERICA CORP. $542.19 SPECIALTY GASSES
153448 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $36,644.00 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.O.8-9-89
153449 ALHAMBRA FOUNDRY CO LTD $0.368.03 MANHOLE FRAMES&COVERS
153450 AMERIDATA $0.128.84 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
153451 AMERICAN AIRLINES $2.050.26 TRAVEL SERVICES
153452 AMERICAN SIGMA $3.247.14 LAB SUPPLIES
153453 BLAKE P.ANDERSON $870.78 EXPENSE REIMS.
153454 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL $365.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
153455 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $2.947.70 NOTICES&ADS
153456 AQUATIC BIOASSAY&CONSULTING $470.00 LAB SERVICES
153457 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE,INC. $2,198.00 TOXIC WASTE REMOVAL
153468 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. $60.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL
153459 ASSOCIATED CONCRETE PRODUCTS $1.512.01 BUILDING MATERIALS
153460 AMSA $500.00 PUBLICATIONS
153481 ATKIWJONES COMPUTER SERVICE $321.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT
153462 RANDOLPH AUSTIN CO. $690.02 LAB SUPPLIES
153463 AWARDS&TROPHIES $111.19 PLAQUES
153464 BFI MEDICAL WASTE SYSTEMS $5.50 WASTE DISPOSAL
153465 E S BABCOCK&SONS INC $1,350.00 LAB ANALYSIS
153466 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $1,199.29 BATTERIES
153467 SAUER COMPRESSOR $128.81 COMPRESSOR PARTS
153468 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $393.30 TRUCK WASH TICKETS
153469 BIO-GRO DIVISION $117,798.87 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 4-2&95
153470 BLACK&VEATCH $702.02 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI.46&P2.55
153471 BONA-RUES $388.88 TRUCK PARTS
153472 BRANDALL MODULAR CORP $56,167.00 INFO.TECH.TRAILER MO4-24-N
153473 BROOKS INSTRUMENT DIV. $236.98 INSTRUMENT
153474 BUDGET JANITORIAL $3,330.00 JANITORIAL SERVICES MO 1-12-94
153475 BUSH&ASSOCIATES,INC. $840.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6.8.94
153476 BUSINESS ENTERPRISE $1,450.00 REGISTRATION
153477 CH2M HILL $75,532.09 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-31
163478 MICROBAC LABORATORIES $720,00 OAS ANALYSIS SERVICES
153479 C P&R CATALOG ORDER DEPT $55.00 PUBLICATION
153480 CS COMPANY $90.25 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
153481 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH $628.72 LAB SUPPLIES
163482 CALTROL,INC. $1,013.29 HARDWARE
153483 CALIF ASSOC.OF SAN.AGENCIES $640.00 WORK CONFERENCE REGISTRATION
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE O8MM6 PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID M07/96 POSTING DATE OBM7/96
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
153484 CALIFORNIA JOURNAL INC $37.95 SUBSCRIPTION
153485 CALIF SOCIETY OF MUNICIPAL $60.00 REGISTRATION
153486 CAMP DRESSER S MC KEY INC $112,297.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES
163487 CANUS CORPORATION $56,354.12 FIBER OPTIC CABLE
153488 CAPITAL WESTWARD $561.99 MECHANICAL PARTS
153489 CAROLLO ENGINEERS $34,686.04 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-38,P243-3
153490 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $7,667.26 OFFICE FURNITURE
153491 CENTURY SAFETY INST.B SUPPLY $222.16 SAFETY SUPPLIES
153492 CHAPMAN COUNSELING $3.600.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING
153493 CLEAN SOURCE $156.41 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
153494 COMMUNICATIONS PERFORMANCE GROUP $10,000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
153495 COMPUTERS AMERICA $2,116.23 PRINTER SUPPLIES
153496 CONNECTOR TECHNOLOGY,INC. $116.33 PERMIT CANCELLATION REFUND
153497 CONNELL GM PARTS/DIV. $42.75 TRUCK PARTS
153498 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $4,520.67 ELECTRIC PARTS
153499 CONSUMER PIPE $449.24 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
153500 CONTINENTAL EQUIPMENT B SUPPLY $3.222.06 TOOLS
153501 CONTRACTORS EQUIPMENT CO $98.62 AUTO PARTS
163502 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS OC $15,745.25 CONSULTING SERVICES M.O.8-11.93
153503 COUNTY CLERK $38.00 CEQA FILING FEE
153504 CA DEPT OF HEALTH SERVICES $3.527.00 ELAP CERTIFICATION FEE
153505 JAMES DARLINGTON $150.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
163506 ALBERT W.DAVIES.INC. $3,219.34 REMOVE TECHITE PIPE
153507 TOM DAWES $428.00 EXPENSE REIMS.
15350E DELL MARKETING L.P. $30.17 COMPUTER PARTS
153509 DEL MAR ANALYTICAL $190.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
153510 DIAMOND LINERS INC $387.67 TRUCK BED LINERS
153511 THE DICKSON COMPANY $161.00 LAB SUPPLIES
153612 DIETERICH-POST CO. $563.14 INSTRUMENT PARTS
153513 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $835.52 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
163514 MICHAEL F DILLON $6,024.50 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
153515 DOUBLETREE INN OF MONTEREY $298.00 ROOM RESERVATION FOR CASA CONF.
153516 ROBERT F.DRIVER ASSOC. $125,000.00 EXCESS LIABILITY INSURANCE NO 5-13.92,6-10.92
163617 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $999.28 PAINT SUPPLIES
153518 THE ECONOMICS PRESS,INC. $45.50 SUBSCRIPTION
153619 EMA/ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES $19.91 PUBLICATION
153520 ENS RESOURCES $2.808.29 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
153521 ESP NORTH $774.77 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
153522 ELCAN TECHNOLOGIES CORP $166.20 TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT
153523 ELECTRA-BOND,INC. $619.56 PUMP REPAIR
153524 EMERGENCY MOMT NETWORK $2.560.00 CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING
153525 ENCHANTER,INC. $5,600.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5-24-95
153526 FST SAND AND GRAVEL,INC. $262.40 ROAD BASE MATERIALS
153527 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $671.20 AIR FREIGHT
163528 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $597.95 FILTERS
153529 FIRST CHOICE $769.72 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT
FUND NO 9199 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE O8105196 PAGE 3
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID O8/07M POSTING DATE O8ffi7M
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
153530 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $7,880.48 LAB SUPPLIES
153531 FISONS INSTRUMENTS 523,054.70 SERVICE AGREEMENT
153532 FLO-SYSTEMS $1.374.05 PUMP PARTS
153533 FORD SAUVAJOT MGMT GROUP S2,3154AS CONSOLIDATION SERVICES
153534 FORKERT ENGINEERING&SURVEY $2,628.35 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MO 6-8-94
153535 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $114.96 PHOTO SUPPLIES
153536 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $17.609.48 WATER USE
153537 THE FOXBORO CO. $1,720.38 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
153538 FRANKLIN QUEST CO. $5,822.15 TIME MANAGEMENT TRAINING
153539 FRY'S ELECTRONICS $3.148.99 ELECTRONIC&COMPUTER SUPPLIES
153540 CITY OF FULLERTON $292.26 WATER USE
153541 GST,INC. $1,541.72 OFFICE SUPPLIES
153542 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $541.23 LUMBERIHARDWARE
153543 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $290.93 CHEMICALS
1535" GATES FIBERGLASS INSTALLERS $1.931.00 EMERGENCY TANK REPAIR
153545 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $4.982.21 TELEPHONE SERVICES
153646 GIERLICH4&ITCHELL,INC. $2,267.67 PUMP PARTS
153547 WIN GRAINGER,INC. $1.409.96 COMPRESSOR PARTS
153648 GRASSY S.T.I. $3,802.62 ENGINE PARTS
153549 GRAYBAR $1,228.05 COMPUTER SUPPLIES
153550 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $239.47 PRINTING SERVICES
153551 DOA CONSULTANTS $16.692.50 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O. 41-94
153552 HE TYPE&GRAPHICS $3.909.17 PRINTING
153553 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $333.91 TRUCK PARTS
153554 HARBOR TRUCK BODY $989.14 TRUCK PARTS
153555 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $352.88 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
153556 HATCH&KIRK,INC. $5,036.73 TRUCK PARTS
153557 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS $4.228.20 CONTAINER RENTALS
1535M RC HOFFMAN AND/OR ISCO $161.12 LAB SUPPLIES
153559 HOME DEPOT $152.05 SMALL HARDWARE
153560 IRS HUGHES CO,INC. $1.016.72 PAINTSUPPLIES
153561 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $11.168.05 WATER USE
153552 I D P $275.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
153663 IPCO SAFETY $4,919.72 SAFETY SUPPLIES
153564 INDUSTRIAL STEAM $375.63 PUMP
153585 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $1.076.00 CONNECTORS
153568 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. $28.90 TRUCK PARTS
153567 IBM CORPORATION#2899767 $348.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
153558 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $877.41 BATTERIES
163689 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $76.62 WATER USE
153570 J2 PRINTING SERVICES $646.50 PRINTING
153571 JAMISON ENGINEERING $12,898.28 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
153572 JANDEL SCIENTIFIC $173.55 SOFTWARE
163573 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $801.53 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
153574 JAYS CATERING $86.40 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE
153575 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO. $309.40 GAUGE
FUNDING 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 0WS/98 PAGE4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 08/07/96 POSTING DATE 08/07/96
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
153576 JONES B ATTWOOD/WASTE TECH $1.000.00 FREIGHT FOR FSM MACHINE FOR TESTING
153577 KMI INDUSTRIES $164.78 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
153578 FRANCES L.KALUZNY $850.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
153579 KEMIRON PACIFIC,INC. $50.078.84 FERRIC CHLORIDE NO 9-27-95
153580 KERRY CONSULTING GROUP $7.375.11 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MO 11-16.95
153581 KEWAUNEE SCIENTIFIC CORP. $113.24 WORKBENCH
153582 KING BEARING,INC. $1,749.77 MACHINE SUPPLIES
153583 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES 55,061.15 TOOLS
153554 KOPYKAT $85.20 MEDICAL RECORDS
153565 LSI NORTH AMERICAN SERVICE $297.00 INSTRUMENT REPAIR
153586 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $1.850.62 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICE
153587 LAIDLAW ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES $13,034.03 HAZARDOUS MATERIAL DISPOSAL
163688 LAW/CRANDAL,INC. $4,955.00 SOIL TESTING 7-13-94
153589 ORANGE COUNTY DIVISION $500.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES
153590 LOCALAGENCY $950.00 ANNEXATION FEE
153591 LYLE SCREENPRINTING $914.31 PICNIC SHIRTS
153592 MPS $101.78 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
153593 MACOMCO $928.20 SERVICE AGREEMENT
153594 MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY CORP. $544.87 WELDING SUPPLIES
153595 MANHOLE ADJUSTING $5,625.00 ADJUST MANHOLE FRAMES 8 COVERS
153596 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION INC $1,392.293.00 CONSTRUCTION P1-36-2
153597 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION INC $245.949.84 CONSTRUCTION P141
153598 MARTIN B SHIRLEY BURNS $75.00 PERMIT REFUND
153599 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $176.18 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
163600 MC AFEE ASSOCIATES $10,265.26 SOFTWARE LICENSE
153601 MCBAIN INSTRUMENTS $660.00 LAB SUPPLIES
153M DONALD F.MCINTYRE $1,000.97 EXPENSE REIMB.
153603 MC JUNKIN CORP $5,853.28 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
1530D4 MELLON TRUST $16.461.87 COP TRUST SERVICES
153605 MESA MUFFLER $257.79 TRUCK PARTS
153605 METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT $696.00 MEMBERSHIP
153007 METTLER TOLEDO,INC. $3.323.23 SCALE REPAIR
153606 MICROFLEX MEDICAL CORP $1011.00 SAFETY SUPPLIES
153609 MIDWAY MFG.8 MACHINING $9,083.23 MECHANICAL REPAIRS
153610 MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES CO $300.06 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
153611 MISSION ABRASIVE SUPPLIES $130.11 SAFETY GLASS
153612 MISSION INDUSTRIES $2.974.87 UNIFORM RENTALS
153813 ISIAH MITCHELL $145.41 EXPENSE REIMB.
153614 MONITOR LABS $77.68 INSTRUMENT
153515 MORELAND B ASSOCIATES $5.125.00 AUDITING SERVICES MO 34e95
153616 MOTOROLA,INC. $13,201.53 INSTRUMENT PARTS
153617 NASCO $501.43 VALVE
153618 NAT WEST MARKETS $750.00 COP INTEREST DRAW FEES
153619 STANDARD REF.MATL PROGRAM $1,912.00 LAB SUPPLIES
153620 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES $8.742.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES
163621 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $102,27 SAFETY FILM RENTALS
E.
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE O8/05196 PAGE 5
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID O8107/86 POSTING DATE O8/07/98
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
153622 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $725.58 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
153623 NEW HERMES INC $10,368.75 ENGRAVER
153624 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $45.64 WATER USE
153625 NICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY $4,877.65 LUBRICANTS/DIESEL FUEL
153M NORTH HILLS COIN-OP LAUNDRY $142.70 PERMIT REFUND
153627 OC-ASTD $365.00 MEMBERSHIP
153628 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $8.273.73 OFFICE SUPPLIES
153629 OMNI WESTERN INC $63.03 TOOLS
153630 ORANGE COUNTY FARM SUPPLY $931.46 CHEMICALS
153531 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $334.63 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
ISM32 ORANGE VALVE 5 FITTING CO. $2,027.78 FITTINGS
163633 ORITEX CORP $1,535.35 MECHANICAL PARTS
153634 OXYGEN SERVICE $2,252.31 SPECIALTY GASES
IW635 COUNTY OF ORANGE $1,050.00 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE
1536M COUNTY OF ORANGE $751.15 OVERAPPORTIONMENT REFUND
153631 ORANGE COUNTY FORUM $25.00 MANAGEMENT LUNCHEON
153638 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT $37,789.40 GAP WATER USE M.O.S.9-93
153639 PBD CONSULTANTS INC $892.04 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
153640 PSI $75.43 HARDWARE
153541 PSOC(POOL SUPPLY OF OC) $452.45 OPERATING SUPPLIES
153642 PSSI $11,522.00 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION
153643 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $851.18 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
153644 PACIFIC BELL $1.304.76 TELEPHONE SERVICES
153645 PADRE JANITORIAL SUPPLY $2,958.52 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
153645 PARKER HANNIFIN CORP. $475.03 MECHANICAL PARTS
153647 PARKHOUSE TIRE,INC. $1,568.84 TIRES
153649 PARTS UNLIMITED $945.92 TRUCK PARTS
153649 PATRIOT VIDEO PRODUCTIONS $519.00 VIDEO TAPING SERVICE
153680 PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION $28,587.16 LAB SUPPLIES
153651 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $531.51 REIMS.PETTY CASH
153652 PIMA ORO SYSTEMS,INC. $102,335.40 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.3-29-95
153653 POLYPURE,INC. $14,624.75 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92
153854 POWER DESIGN $943.89 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS
153655 POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO. $397.38 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
153656 POWER SYSTEMS $570.40 MAINTENANCE
153657 PRENTICE HALL $37.97 PUBLICATION
153658 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $335.00 ICE FOR SAMPLES
ISM59 PULSAFEEDER $499.79 PUMP PARTS
153660 OUICKSTART TECHNOLOGIES $1,050.00 CONSULTING SERVICES
153681 RJN GROUP,INC. $9,000.00 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
163662 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $593.10 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS
153663 R 8 R INSTRUMENTS $671.14 ELECTRIC PARTS
153684 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $2,002.72 TRASH REMOVAL
153665 REBIS $5.000.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
153666 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DIST $70.27 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
153667 THE REGISTER $844.68 NOTICES 8 ADS
FUNDING 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 08/05/96 PAGE 6
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CI-AIMS PAID 08/07I98 POSTING DATE O8/07/98
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
153668 ROSEN'S ELECTRIC $646.50 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
153669 SKC WEST $101.31 SAFETY SUPPLIES
153670 SPSS,INC $862.00 SOFTWARE
153671 SANCON ENGINEERING,INC. $750.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES
ISM72 SARBS-CWEA-PDC, INC. $500.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
153673 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTL $325,422.33 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.64894
ISM74 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $636.80 SPECIALTY GASES
153575 SEA COAST DESIGNS $12.93 LAS SUPPLIES
153676 SEAWATERVISIONS $603.40 COOLER
153677 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $4.115.03 TOOLS
153678 SHASTA ELECTRIC $287,344.00 CONSTRUCTION J-31-2
153679 SHORE PERSONNEL SERVICES $10,000.00 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
153680 SHURELUCK SALES $8.296.65 TOOLS/HARDWARE
153681 SIEVERS INSTRUMENTS INC. $1,800.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
153682 SKILL PATH SEMINARS $99.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
153683 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $290.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS
153684 SMITH-EMERY CO. $1,934.00 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-13-94
153685 SMITH PIPE&SUPPLY $736.65 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
153686 SO CALIF EDISON CO $50,936.74 POWER
153687 SO.CAL GAS.CO. $2,239.41 NATURAL GAS
153688 SOUTHERN CALIF GAS COMPANY $15.450.00 CONSTRUCTION P7-51
153689 SOUTHERN CALIF TRANE SERVICE $10,059.00 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
153690 SPARLING INSTRUMENT CO.,INC. $115.10 METER
153691 SPEX CERTIPREP INC. $88.78 LAB SUPPLIES
153692 STANDARD BUFF&EQUIP CO $305.80 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
153693 STATE CHEMICAL MANUFACTURING $1,290.32 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
153694 STERLING ART $238.78 ART SUPPLIES
153895 SUMMIT STEEL $110.34 METAL
153696 SUNSETFORD $126.37 TRUCK PARTS
153697 SUPELCO,INC. $639.69 LAB SUPPLIES
153698 SUPER CHEM CORP. $2.009.65 CHEMICALS
153699 SYMCAS $1.475.00 CONSULTING SERVICES
163700 SYSCOM INC $2.036.54 HUMAN RESOURCES TRAINING
153701 MAHIN TALESI $565.82 EXPENSE REIMB.
163702 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $377.91 ELECTRIC CART PARTS
153703 TEXAS ANALYTICAL CONTROLS $804.06 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS
153704 THEODORE ROBBINS FORD $248.96 VEHICAL RENTAL
153705 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $2.822.94 MECHANICAL PARTS
153706 TIME WARNER COMMUNICATIONS $41.28 CABLE SERVICES
153707 TONY'S LOCK&SAFE SERVICE $292.96 LOCKS&KEYS
153708 EDWARD M.TORRES $223.92 EXPENSE REIMB.
153709 TOSHIBA INTERNATIONAL $1.203.62 INSTRUMENT PARTS
153710 TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY,INC. $16,742.68 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.0.5-11-94
153711 TRUESDAIL LABS $6.188.00 LAB SERVICES
153712 JG TUCKER&SON,INC. $143.94 INSTRUMENT PARTS
153713 US POSTAL SERVICE $5,000.00 POSTAGE
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 08/05/96 PAGE 7 +
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMSPAID08107195 POSTING DATE O807/96
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
153714 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $396.00 LAB SUPPLIES
153715 UNISOURCEB/OR BUTLER PAPER $403.67 OFFICE SUPPLIES
153716 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $639.10 PARCEL SERVICES
153717 VWR SCIENTIFIC $4.602.87 LAB SUPPLIES
153718 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $351.66 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
153719 VERNE'S PLUMBING $205.00 PLUMBING SERVICES
153720 VERTEX SYSTEMS $2.363.01 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT
153721 WACKENHUT CORP. $11,867.32 CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS
153722 WAL-CON CONSTRUCTION CO. $7,141.12 CONSTRUCTION
153723 CARL WARREN 8 CO. $4,051.53 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR
153724 WASTE MARKETS $12,226.03 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 3.27-96
163725 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $17,774,50 CAUSTIC SODA MO 8-23-95
153726 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $1,959.80 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE MO 4-24-96
153727 WESTERN WHOLSALE CO $85.91 TRUCK SUPPLIES
153728 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $732.42 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
153729 WESCO DISTRIBUTION INC. $1,595.78 INSTRUMENT PARTS
153730 CHARLES F.WINSOR $515.00 EXPENSE REIMS.
153731 WITEG $765.03 LAB SUPPLIES
153732 ROURKE,WOODRUFF B SPRADLIN $47,705.33 LEGAL SERVICES MO 7.26-95
153733 WORDPERFECT $55.94 SUBSCRIPTIONS
153734 XEROX CORP. $23.328.91 COPIER LEASES
153735 ZYMARK CORP. $1.513.50 LAB EQUIPMENT
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID ORM7196 $3.877,540.35
FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 08/05/96 PAGES
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 081071% POSTING DATE O8/07M
SUMMARY AMOUNT
M1 OPER FUND $60.00
A7 CONST FUND ($998.30)
92 OPER FUND $4,970.20
02 CAP FAC FUND $892.04
A2 CONST FUND ($5,362.93)
$3 OPER FUND $32,626.13
$3 CAP FAC FUND $64.582.59
$3 CONST FUND $12,825.96
$5 OPER FUND $4,857.72
$5 CONST FUND ($1,450.11)
$6 CAP FAC FUND $200.00
$6 CONST FUND ($646.33)
$7 OPER FUND $31.363.77
$7 CAP FAC FUND $6,867.00
$7 CONST FUND ($1,726.05)
#11 OPER FUND $353.21
#11 CAP FAC FUND $260.00
pit CONST FUND ($1,160.64)
R13 CONST FUND $2.55
S14 OPER FUND $32.13
$14 CONST FUND $15.00
0&11 OPER FUND $1,875.00
M5&6 OPER FUND $3.186.08
S5&6 CAP FAC FUND $991.34
W6&7 OPER FUND 52,202.90
S7&14 OPER FUND $7,294.62
JT OPER FUND $1,040,405.05
CORF $2,301.318.40
SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $133.819.66
.IT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $237,881.45
$3,877,540.35
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE-VARIOUS PAGE 1 `
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID-MISCELLANEOUS HANDWRITE WARRANTS
WARRANT DATE WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
0822/96 153994 CALL AMERICA INC $90AD CELLULAR PHONE REIMB.
0822196 153995 DOUGLAS STEWART $635.00 EXPENSE REIMB.
0827/96 154014 TRISTATE SEMINAR $270.00 REGISTRATION
0827/96 154015 WEFTEC'95 $940.00 REGISTRATION
0828/96 154016 KNOTTS BERRY FARM $1,503.50 DISCOUNTTICKETS
O8I3028 164236 TRISTATE SEMINAR ON-THE-RMER $210.00 REGISTRATION
09105M 154237 THE BALBOA BAY CLUB $3,314.70 NEWPORT SPILL-ANDERSON
09/05/96 154238 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE $6,798.61 MEDICARE ADJUSTMENT
09/05/96 154239 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $19,591.26 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP
09105M 154240 R.CRAIG SCOTT 8 ASSOC. $7,000.00 EXPERT WITNESS RETAINER FEE
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID $40,353.17
SUMMARY AMOUNT
#1 OPER FUND $892.78
#2 OPER FUND $2,167.40
#3 OPER FUND $1,993.35
#5 OPER FUND $265.83
#6 OPER FUND $278.74
#7 OPER FUND $624.11
#11 OPER FUND $516.69
#13 OPER FUND $73.43
#14 OPER FUND $186.28
JT OPER FUND $2,618.50
SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $29,905.96
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $1,030.10
$40.353.17
F,xIa.Sao.UwOo" AGENDA
O COMA.INFO.nEM D
❑ COMA,.ACTION ITEM ITEM a
J° jr.BmcoNsENT TRANSMITTAL
❑ Jr.BDS.DISCUSSION
(NONC NSENT)
❑ PUBUC NEARING
Jr.8DS.MEETING DATE
Jr.BDS.AGENDA ITEM W.
MEETING DATE COMM.ID.NO. DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION 12JR—(InNals of Originator)
OMITS: OMITS
PDC: PDC
FAHR: FAHR 5 Div.3720,Joe RymaIe,Ext.5057
EXEC: EXEC
STEER: STEER Division No.,Name,and Extern ion
JT.BDS:9/25M
AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
Agenda Wording:
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION ORDERING ANNEXATION NO. 9 -CRYSTAL COVE STATE PARK, a
State of California Department of Parks and Recreation twenty acre site, known as the"Historical District,
located on Pacific Coast Highway north of the intersection with Sand Canyon Avenue.
Recommended Action(s):
Adopt Resolution ordering Annexation No. 9 to County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County.
CEQA REVIEW: Project is Exempt: YES DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM:
Date Notice of Exemption FIIW 7rM
6/28195
BUDGET INFORMATION CURRENTYEAR CURRENT YEAR. YEAR-TO43ATE REVISED BUDGET
TOTAL BUDGETED AMT, NIA BUDGETAMOUNT T04DATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL
EXPENDITURES ITomi amy cM.Tm .ol
N/A N/A N/A NIA
AIT/PROJECT COST INFORMATION ORIGINAL BID, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED PROJECT
PO,CONTRACT FUNDS PREY. REQUESTED THIS AMOUNT
AMOUNT APPROVED An
N/A N/A N/A N/A
WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? NO
If VES,zMre number: _Permanent Limitetl Term H YES,explain in ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section
CONCURRENCES: ATTACHMENTS TO AGENDA (List)
q I To Committee: 1. N/A
ti I
Sig ire Date
Div ion M n ( DesignTo A. Ede-
6� p
Signature. Date
Depart, r esign
Signs ure ate
Assistant General Manager(Or Designee)
OMTS COMM. PDC COMM. FAHR COMM. JOINT BOARDS
Meetlng Date:
Approved:
Amended:
Forwarded to:
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION(Background and/or Summary)
In August 1993, the Directors approved a license and reimbursement agreement with Irvine Ranch Water
District (IRWD) and the State of California Department of Parks and Recreation (State)for construction,
reimbursement and ownership of sewer facilities to serve the Crystal Cove State Park. These facilities are built
with the exception of the future local sewer facilities in and around the"historical district" of Crystal Cove State
Park. County Sanitation District No. 5 (CSD 5) has never annexed the 20 acres which surround the "historical
district'and includes the old cottages right on the beach. This annexation is in accordance with a 1984 property
tax agreement with the County of Orange. IRWD is the local sewering agency. To provide sewer service to this
portion of the State Park, it is necessary for the State to request and pay for the annexation of these 20 acres
to District No. 5.
On June 26, 1995, the Directors approved an annexation agreement with the State which provided for both
annexation fees and connection fees for the District to annex the above referenced 20 acres and allow the
State to connect all future anticipated local sewerage system improvements into the Districts collection system.
A total of$194,468.00 was paid to CSD 5 by the State on January 12, 1996 in accordance with the 1995
annexation agreement. The Orange County Loral Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) has approved the
annexation petition and staff recommends that the Directors approve and order the annexation.
RJR:jmf/dl
c: Department Head
AGM-Administration
AGM-Operations
General Manager
J:%WPDOCWGENDAWRs-9MEPIANNEx 09
AGENDA
ITEM
TRANSMITTAL
mm
MEETING DATE DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION P-,)A (InNele of Odgin d,x)
OMTS:
PDC:
FAHR: Div.3720, Joe Rycraw,Ext.5057
EXEC: -..e,. 5LL 7
STEER:
JT.BDS:9/25/96 ( Division No..Name,and Extension
AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTTON(S):
Agenda Wording:
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION ORDERING ANNEXATION NO. 151 GOODMAN ANNEXATION, consisting
of 1.01 acres of unincorporated county territory, to the Districts, in the vicinity south of the intersection of Lower
Lake Drive and Lake Court. (Annexation No. 151 - Goodman Annexation)
Recommended Action(s):
This annexation is in accordance with the terms of the negotiated agreement with the County of Orange re:A.B.8
tax exchange for annexing properties under which the District no longer receives a percentage of the basic levy
and instead collects a higher annexation fee. Staff recommends approval of this resolution. The City of Orange
is the local sewering agency.
CEOA REVIEW: Project Is Exempt: YES DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM:
Dale Notice of Emmietlon Flied:74M
Negative Declaration Approved on
Final EIR Approved on_and Nolloe of Detemilration glad on_ Apol 24, 1996
FUNDS BUDGETED: Total: N/A CURRENTYEAR CURRENTYEAR-TO- YEAR-TOZATE TOTAL REVISED
SOURCE: CORF JO DISTRICTS BUDGETAMOUNT DATE EXPENDITURES BUDGET BALANCE PROJECT COST
Sehedule/Uns Rom:WA
AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: N/A N/A N/A N/A
ScheduWUns Item:WA
WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO CONSISTENT WITH BOARD POLICY? YES
1(YES,state number _Permanent Umhed Term
CONCURRENCES: ATTACHMENTS TO AGENDA(Uel)
Igrmlu e ` // Date
DMelon
t (0/ ealgne V To Commit". 1. N/A
[=`5 d—
nelum pa e
DeparWrlen a r eaig e)
To A.Bds.:
��•— /o it 96
Sigiiatta. Date
Assistant General Manager(Or Designee)
J:%W PDOCWGENDAWITSMZEP14NNEX.151
T - OMTS COMM POC COMM. FAtar COMM. JOW80AROS
Mc no
Appm
Ammltlgd _
i
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION(Background anWw Summary)
January 5, 1996 the District received a request from Lawrence and Sharlene Goodman, occupants of a single-
family residence located at 20682 Santiago Canyon Road, to annex their 1.01 acre parcel into the District 7. The
Goodman's were experiencing a serious problem with their septic system.
The annexation is in accordance with the term of the negotiated agreement with the County of Orange re AB 8
Tax Exchange for annexing properties under which the District no longer receives a percentage of the basic levy
and, instead collects a higher annexation fee. This includes our annexation acreage fee of$3,943.04, the
recovery of cost for Local Agency Formation Commission Processing Fee ($950), State Board of Equalization
Processing Fee ($250), District Processing Fee ($500), and California Environmental Quality Act Filing Fee
($25). The total annexation fee is $5,668.04. The local sewering agency is the City of Orange.
c: Department Head
AGM-Administration
AGM-Operations
General Manager
J:=PD0CWGENDAV ITS-9SISEPKNNEx.1 Si Page 2 of 2
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
SEPTEMBER 25, 1996
District No. 13
Agenda Item (11 ): Consideration of motion approving a new
negotiated Consent Decree re U. S. Government v.
Montrose Chemical Corp., et al., at no cost to the
Districts.
Summary
Please see General Counsel's attached memorandum dated August 9, 1996.
This item was carried over for District No. 13 only from the August 26, 1996 meeting
due to a lack of quorum.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Boards of Directors approve the new negotiated Consent
Decree.
J:\wPDOC%B51AG96141 EP%W.1 1
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County,California
Y P.O. Box 8127 • 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127
Telephone: (714)962-2411
DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE
Wednesday, August 28, 1996- 5:30 p.m.
A meeting of the Steering Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13
and 14 of Orange County, California was held Wednesday, August 28, 1996, at 5:30 p.m., at the
Districts' Administrative office.
(1) ROLL CALL
The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
STEERING COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT:
Present: STAFF PRESENT:
John J. Collins, Joint Chair Blake P. Anderson, Assistant General Manager
Peer A. Swan, Vice Joint Chair Judith A. Wilson, Assistant General Manager
George Brown, Chair, FAHR Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary
Pat McGuigan, Chair, OMTS
Sheldon Singer, Chair, PDC
Absent:
John C. Cox, Jr., Past Joint Chair
Roger Stanton, Vice Chair, FAHR
(2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no comments by any member of the public.
(4) APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of the July 24, 1996 Steering Committee meeting were approved as drafted.
Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting Y
Page 2
August 28, 1996
(5) REPORTS OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR GENERAL MANAGER AND GENERAL
COUNSEL
(a) The Committee Chairman announced that while the agenda is short for the Joint
Board meeting tonight, it could be a long meeting because of the closed session
items.
It was moved, seconded and passed to add to discussion items under Agenda
Item (6); (d) a discussion of the agreement with the Orange County Water District
for GAP water, and (e) the Silverado Construction Company dewatering issue.
(b) There was no report by the General Manager because he was on vacation.
(c) There was no report by Counsel-
(6) DISCUSSION ITEMS
(a) Orange County Reclamation Protect. Blake Anderson gave the members of the
Steering Committee an update on the status of the project as well as some
background information because the Districts has received an unsolicited proposal
from Wheelabrator-Carollo (W-C) on this project which could prove to be very
advantageous to the Districts, as well as moving the reclamation project towards
completion. It appears that the major stumbling blocks for the project in the eyes
of the Orange County Water District are funding and rate impacts. Blake described
the activities that are underway, including several research studies.
The W-C proposal, a"what-if" proposal, would provide the finance, design,
construction, operation and maintenance of the 100 mgd reclamation project
through a private contract with a prenegotiated rate of return, open books, and a
fast-track construction project. Any reclamation project could significantly reduce
the amount of water going through the outfall, resulting in large savings, and would
change the recommendations in the Strategic Plan. With a start date of 1997, the
project could be on line by 1999-2000.
This project has been discussed with Bill Mills, and W-C will be making a
presentation to OCWD staff on September 9.
The Committee members indicated that if the project pencils out, they will continue
to listen. The largest issue at this time is whether this project could be sole-
sourced. Staff has requested an opinion from General Counsel.
Staff will keep the Steering Committee updated on this very interesting project
proposal.
Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting
Page 3
August 28, 1996
(b) Update on Labor Negotiations. Judy Wilson reported that negotiations are
underway with Local 501. The first meeting is scheduled for September 4. A
proposal has also been received from the Professional and Supervisory Group.
They are requesting that their negotiations also begin at this time.
Judy also discussed the role of the labor negotiators that the Districts have hired.
(c) September Working Committee Agenda Items. The items being presented to the
Committees in September were discussed. There are two items relating to the
Boise Chica sewer replacement, a contract for the design and a reimbursement
agreement. New issues have surfaced which could cause some delay. Among
those are the need for the state to get capital authorization to proceed. Blake also
mentioned that the Surfriders have asked for an update on the status of this
project. If the state is having problems getting authorization, the Surfriders may be
willing to assist in a PR campaign.
Chair Collins expressed his concern that we will still be blamed for this problem.
The public will perceive the Districts as being at fault and that's why we're fixing
the sewer for the state, or that the Districts has so much money we ran afford to
fix the slate's problem. He stated that we need to improve the public relations. He
is also concerned that the state has never publicly stated that they are at fault as
well as acknowledging that we have offered to help.
Directors Brown and Swan suggested that the only way to get people's attention is
to close the beach by going to the Orange County Health Department and
expressing our concern. However, the only way the OC Health Department can
close the beach is if the bacterial numbers are not being met.
(d) Negotiations with OCWD for GAP Water. Staff is seeking authorization to re-
negotiate the purchase of GAP water from the Orange County Water District. The
issues to be discussed include the pricing, tern of the agreement and
interruptibility of service.
(a) Dewatering Problems re East Foothill Transportation Corridor. Silverado
Construction is the contractor on this project which has encountered very high
groundwater at an under crossing and has asked for our help in solving this
problem, which is located in District 14 and in IRWD's service area. There are two
issues. The first is dewatering during construction (about 2.2 mgd) and the second
is dewater after construction (about 500,000 gpd). At the time the project was
designed, it was thought that the water could be discharged to Peters Canyon
Wash, however, the nitrate concentrations are too high.
The present thinking is that IRWD will charge for conveying the water to our Main
Street Pump Station and then we would back out the 2.2 mgd coming from
District 14 and we would then charge the normal O&M costs and annual capital
costs for the two years of construction dewatering.
Director Swan indicated that there is a possibility of discharging to a desalter in the
Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting
Page 4
August 28, 1996
future, and that would eliminate some of the problems.
Al this time the plan is to present the agreement to the October committees and
the Boards. Judy mentioned that there is also a need for an agreement with the
Transportation Corridor Agency and Cal-Trans and that there will be wording that
makes the agreement transferrable in the future.
This is an example of the types of issues the newly formed Rate Advisory
Committee will be addressing in coming months.
(7) CLOSED SESSION
There was no closed session-
(8) OTHER BUSINESS
There was no other business discussed.
(9) MATTERS TO BE REPORTED AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING
Director Swan suggested that a status report be made to the OMTS Committee on how
the plant is operating, indicating any problems and fixes.
(10) MATTERS ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT
No matters were identified.
(11) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS
Director McGuigan announced that because there was only one item scheduled for the
OMTS Committee in September, she would be announcing at the Joint Boards Meeting
that-the September 4, 1996 OMTS Committee meeting will be canceled.
The next meeting of the Steering Committee has been scheduled for September 25, 1996
at 5:30 p.m.
i
Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting
Page 5
August 28, 1996
(12) ADJOURNMENT
The Steering Committee adjourned at approximately 7:05 p.m.
ubmitted by:
n Tappan, SteA04 Committee Secretary
�-COMM1f8N�.MIM
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County,California
P.O.Box 8127 • 108"Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127
Telephone: (714) 962-2411
DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING, DESIGN,
AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MEETING
Thursday, September S. 1996, at 6:00 p.m.
A meeting of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee of the County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on September 5, 1996, at
6:00 p.m., at the Districts' Administrative Office. Prior to the beginning of the meeting, there was a
brief tour of the Headworks and the new GSA(Information Technology) office trailer complex.
ROLL CALL
The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
Present: Staff Present:
Sheldon Singer, Chair David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Walter K Bowman Bob Ooten, Director of Operations & Maintenance
John Collins, Joint Chair Doug Stewart, Engineering Manager
Shirley Dettloff Tom Dawes, Planning Manager
Don Griffin Chris Cervellone, Engineering Supervisor
Barry Hammond, Vice Chair
Margie Rice Others Present:
Peer Swan
Charles Sylvia Lee Badenscher, Lee & Ro
Daniel Welch Kellene Bum-Lucht, Camp, Dresser& McKee
Duane Jensen, Carollo Engineers
Absent Bill Knopf, Cardillo Engineers
Gail Lynch, Carollo Engineers
Bob Zemel Jeff McDonnell, Pascal & Ludwig
APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No comments were made.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of the August 1, 1996 Planning, Design, and Construction Committee meeting were
approved as drafted.
r
Minutes of the Planning, Design
and Construction Committee
Page 2
September 5, 1996
REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
The Chair had no report.
REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
The General Manager had no report.
REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER-ADMINISTRATION
The Assistant General Manager of Administration had no report.
REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER-OPERATIONS
The Assistant General Manager of Operations had no report.
REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING
The Director of Engineering gave an update on Project P1-36-2.
REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
General Counsel had no report.
DISCUSSION ITEMS (Nos. 1-10)
Please Note:Although the following items were acted upon in another sequence, the minutes
herein list them in the original numerical order for tracking purposes.
1. PDC96-48: CAROLLO ENGINEERS WILL PRESENT THE COMMITTEE WITH A REPORT ON
THE STATE OF THE INVESTIGATION AND REPAIR OF THE OCEAN OUTFALL,
JOB NO. J-39, (All Districts): The report will be given by Gail Lynch and Duane
Jensen.
Information Item only. More details will be presented at the September 21, 1996
workshop.
2. PDC96-41: MONTHLY REPORT ON CHANGE ORDERS, (All Districts): The Director of
Engineering will review the Monthly Change Order Report form dated
September 5, 1996.
Information Item only. Action on change orders that require PDC Committee or
Boards' approval will be taken separately. Four change orders this month.
Minutes of the Planning, Design
and Construction Committee
Page 3
September 5, 1996
3. PDC96-42: APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 4 TO CONTRACT P1-36-2 WITH MARGATE
CONSTRUCTION, INC. FOR SECONDARY TREATMENT IMPROVEMENTS AT
PLANT NO. 1, (All Districts): The Construction Manager and Director of Engineering
request approval of Change Order No. 4 providing seven items of additional work
and four credit items.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: PDC Committee recommends approval of Change
Order No.4 to Contract No. 1511-36-2 with Margate Construction, Inc. for an addition
of$24,733.00, increasing the total contract amount to$34,918,007.00.
4. PDC96-43: APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 9 TO CONTRACT NOS. P1-36-1, P1-38-1,
P1-38-4, J-17-2, AND P2-43-3 WITH ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS FOR
MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 1 AND
PLANT NO. 2, (All Districts): The Construction Manager and Director of
Engineering request approval of Change Order No. 9 for six items of additional work
and one credit item.
MOTION: PDC Committee approves Change Order No. 9 to Contract Nos.
P1-36.1, P1-38-1, P1-38.4, J-17.2, and P2-43-3 with Advanco Constructors for an
addition of$27,265.00, increasing the total contract amount to $ 6,287,866.00.
5. PDC96-44: APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NOS. 2 AND 3 TO CONTRACT 3-36R WITH
ALBERT W. DAVIES, INC.; AND ACCEPT THE CONTRACT AS COMPLETE AND
AUTHORIZE EXECUTION OF THE NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND APPROVE
THE FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT, (District No. 3): The Construction Manager
and Director of Engineering request approval of Change Order No. 2 providing six
items of additional work and Change Order No. 3, Adjustment of Engineer's
Quantities and Final Closeout Agreement of the Westminster Avenue Force Main
(First Unit) and new Westside Pump Station Force Main.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: PDC Committee recommends approval of Change
Order No. 2 to Contract No. 3-36R with Albert W. Davies, Inc. for an addition of
$31,301,55, approval of Change Order No. 3, Adjustment of Engineers quantities
for a deduction of$42,216.00, increasing the total contract amount to
$3,823,756.55, and approval of final Closeout Agreement,
6. PDC96-45: AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED WITH PHASE II AND III OF THE STRATEGIC
PLAN INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (All Districts): The Engineering
Department requests authority to proceed with the remaining work on the Strategic
Plan including authority to negotiate Addendum No. 1 to PSA with Camp Dresser&
McKee for Phase 11, Treatment, Reuse and Disposal Facilities, and Request for
Proposals and negotiate a Professional Services Agreement for Preparation of
Programmatic Environmental Impact Report, Phase III.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: PDC Committee recommends proceeding with
implementation of the Strategic Plan and soliciting proposals from qualified firms for
both Phase 11 and Phase III.
Minutes of the Planning, Design
and Construction Committee
Page 4
September 5, 1996
7. PDC9646: JOB NO. J-43, REHABILITATION OF BOLSA CHICA STATE BEACH SEWERAGE
SYSTEM, (All Districts): The Director of Engineering in conjunction with the
Director of Technical Services requests the Purchasing Manager to issue a
purchase order to Camp Dresser& McKee, Inc. for a professional services
agreement for a total amount not to exceed $321,260.00 for design and
construction management services to repair and/or rehabilitate the State of
California gravity sewers, lift stations and force mains which appear to be leaking
sewage into and through the sand at Boise Chica State Beach. A separate
reimbursement contract between the Districts and the State of California is under
active discussion, and will be the subject of the FAHR Committee Meeting of
September 11, 1996.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Remove from consideration and action due to lack of
acceptable reimbursement agreement with the State of California.
8. PDC96-37: AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO MODIFICATIONS TO ELECTRICAL AND CONTROL
SYSTEMS AND PROCESS EVALUATIONS AT PLANT NO. 1,JOB NO. P1-40-1,
AND MODIFICATIONS TO ELECTRICAL AND CONTROL SYSTEMS AND
PROCESS EVALUATIONS AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-47-1 (All Districts): The
Engineering Department and the Director of Engineering requests that the
Professional Services Agreement with Lee & Ro Consulting Engineers , Inc. be
amended providing for additional engineering services for design changes at an
increase of$76,801.00.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: PDC Committee recommends approval of Amendment
No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with Lee & Ro Consulting Engineers,
Inc., increasing the contract amount to $1,247,967.00.
9. PDC96-47: JOB NO. P2-58 WITH GIERLICH-MITCHELL, INC. FOR REHABILITATION OF
GRIT AUGER AT PLANT NO. 2, (All Districts): The Engineering Department
requests that Contracts/Purchasing Manager be authorized to issue a purchase
order for rehabilitation of grit auger at Plant No. 2 at a cost of$63,680.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: PDC Committee recommends approval to authorize
issuing a Purchase Order for Job No. P2-58, Rehabilitation of Grit Auger at Plant
No. 2, to Gieriich-Mitchell for design services, manufacturing services and
installation services of equipment for a total cost of$63,680.
10. PDC9649: JOB NO. P1-40-2 (REBID), FACILITY MODIFICATIONS AND SAFETY UPGRADES
AT PLANT NO. 1, AND JOB NO. P247-2 (REBID), FACILITY MODIFICATIONS
AND SAFETY UPGRADES AT PLANT NO. 2, (All Districts): Receive and file letter
dated August 21, 1996, from Margate Construction, Inc., protesting the apparent
low bid of Pascal & Ludwig Engineers.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: PDC Committee recommends that this matter be
referred to the Executive Committee for further discussions prior to action by the
Boards of Directors.
Minutes of the Planning, Design
and Construction Committee
Page 5
September 5, 1996
CLOSED SESSION
There was no closed session.
OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS, OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY
There was no other business discussed.
MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT
MEETING
There were none.
CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS
The next Planning, Design, and Construction Committee meeting is scheduled for October 3, 1996.
ADJOURNMENT
The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 8:30 p.m.
Submitted by:
Gail cai�
Planning, Design, and Construction
Committee Secretary
:go
.uawooxvorasysew.+wu�s wvo
AGENDA
❑ G o.lTe I s ITEM
�' Q"CIXRn.AGTtGN❑EV '
n E°s G°" `"r TRANSMITTAL
awn.ecs.csuvss�+t b m
(�++ooruENB _
❑p PthNJG PFlRING
7����JT.BGS.AG_'L'(iVG GATE
T eos.AGENCAITPA ra.
MEETING DATE COMM.ID.N0. DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION (I ftialsof Originator)
OMTS: �Ts
PDC:9-6-96 PDC
FAHR: FAHR
EXEC EXEC: STEER all 3720,Jack Vincent,ext 5050
STEER: Division No.,Name,and Extension
Jr.eDs:�j�.g
AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
Agenda Wording:
JOB NO. Pi WITH GIERLICH-MITCHELL, INC. FOR REHABILITATION OF GRIT AUGER AT PLANT 2,
All Districts: The Engineering Department requests that Contracts/Purchasing Manager be authorized to
issue a purchase order for rehabilitation of grit auger at Plant 2 at a cost of$63,680.
Recommended Actions):
1. Authorize issuing a Purchase Order for Job No. P2-58, Rehabilitation of Grit Auger at Plant 2, to Giedich-
Mitchell for design services, manufacturing services and installation services of equipment for a total cost of
$63,680.
CEOAREVIEW: Project is Exempt: No MOSTRECENTBOARD ACTIONON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM:
Date Notice of Exemption Filed:
Negative Declaration Approved on
Final EIR Approved on_and Notice of Determination filed on July 19M nom
FUNDS BUDGETED: Total: $99.565 CURRENT YEAR CURRENT YEAR-TO- YEAR-TO43ATE TOTAL REVISED
SOURCE: CORE BUDGET AMOUNT DATE EXPENDITURES BUDGET BALANCE PROJECT COST
Section 8,Page 5, Item: B.7.d,
AMOUNT OF TRANSFER:
SchedulelUne Item: $99,565 $0.00
$99,565 $99,565
WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO CONSISTENT WITH BOARD POLICY? YES
If YES,staenumher. _Permanent Limded Term
CONCURRENCES: // 1 �I/ // ATTACHMENTS TO AGENDA(List)
,�L"l/ C1J P11 �L '4' 1 Zz 'u'
Sign re ads
Divi Mani(Or Deal Tree) To Committee:
S' natu I Dew
pa M e rDe )
To JL BOs.:
gne re Dew
Assistant General Manager(Or DWgrw)
r
Additional Information(Background and/or Summary)
The existing grit auger system was put in service approximately 30 years ago and has become
inefficient and a severe maintenance problem. Repairs are frequent and costly, the grit augers are
out of service at the same time for repairs, grit is carried over into the digesters which increases
digester maintenance.
It appears that the latest technology in grit transfer systems will greatly reduce our high maintenance
cost. The most promising system investigated by Districts' staff is the Polychem Non-Metallic Grit
System. This system will fit into the existing grit auger troughs and uses plastic chain like that
specified for our clarifier mechanisms. Comments from other users have been favorable.
There are three grit augers at Plant No. 2 and two at Plant No. 1 which have similar problems and for
which major maintenance has been delayed due to the expectation that a better system will be
installed. Before purchasing new systems, the Districts Staff want to test the newer technology at the
Plant 2 grit and facility configuration. After testing the equipment, the Districts will prepare a detailed
specifications for bidding a replacement of all the remaining grit augers.
This procurement is a sole source because the product has unique features and apparent qualities
not found on other equipment. The proposed trial provides a means of testing the equipment and
gathering data for future procurement specifications.
The total cost of the proposed system is $63,680.00. Payment will be made in two installments. The
first installment will be 50% of the installation cost and 50% of the equipment cost and will be due and
payable upon start-up of the new equipment.
The second installment, which is the balance of the purchase price, will be due and payable after nine
months of successful operation.
JAV:Imf/dl
c: Deparlmeni Head
AGrhAtlminletraran
AGM-0Pe20ons
Gemml Manager
J:\WPOOC\PDC91MEPl9riO3 Page 2 of 2
Reviabn: 81il
BUDGET INFORMATION
TASK BUDGET FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED%
(ADOPTED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE COMPLETE TO
BY CORF) TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZED TO DATE DATE
FUNDS
VENDOR/ 5,000 0 5,000 5,000 0 0
ENGINEERING
EQUIPMENT 43,100 0 43,100 43,100 0 0
CONSTRUCTION 15,580 0 15.580 15,580 0 0
STAFF TIME 32,885 0 32,885 32,885 0 0
RENTAL 3,000 0 3.000 3,000 0 0
TOTAL -99,565 1 0 1 99.565 1 99,565 1 0 1 0
I'I Budget from miscellaneous small projects budget B.7.d.
J:\W PDOCIPDC981SEP%603.TBL
a µ AGENDA
\
ITEM
eGar� x er TRANSMITTAL
g
MEETING DATE DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION (InBUN oI Originator)
OMITS' :;., ,
PDC erwrx 3790,Tod Herres,Eed.5104
n
FAHR' DMalon No.,Now,and ENenaion
EXEC' XEDSsc y
AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTbrNS):
Agenda Wording:
APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 4 TO CONTRACT P1-36-2 WITH MARGATE CONSTRUCTION, INC. FOR
SECONDARY TREATMENT IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 1: The Construction Manager and Director of
Engineering request approval of Change Order No. 4 providing seven items of additional work and four credit
items.
Recommended Action(s):
Approve Change Order No. 4 to Contract No. Pt-36-2 with Margate Construction Inc. for an addition of
$24,733.00, increasing the total contract amount to $ 34,918,007.00.
CEOA REVIEW:Project is Exempt:Not AppMeehle MOST RECENT 130ARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM:
82"6
FUNDS BUDGETED: TOW: $38,016.000 CURRENT YEAR CURRENT YEAR-T0. YEAR-TO-DATE TOTAL REVISED
SOURCE: CORF: Item A.3.o,SW.e Page4 BUDGETAMOUNT DATE EXPENDITURES BUDGET BALANCE PROJECT COST
$14,500,000 $2,444,396 $12,055,604 $34,918,007.
WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO CONSISTENTWTI BOARD POLICY? YES
CON CES: o ATTACHMENTSTO AGENDA(List)
/1—f-L To CommBes: 1. Change Order No.4
sigfeature Date
Mmeger(Or Designee)
yb
Lo DateTo JI,Bds.: 1. Signed Change Order No.4
e _ (O dgran,
Signature , D
Assistant General Manager(Or Dealgnse)
'-��' Fc a+"' v1bRJ1'"80ARUS
Aneided ��� rz -
pN1AMrkIslO"
y t
Page 1 of 2
J 1WPDOCIENGIPI-38.2NIT.WPD
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (Background and/or Summary) n
Job No. Pi-36-2, Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1,consists of expanding the secondary treatment
capacity at Plant No. 1. The project provides ten new secondary clarifiers, replacement of the existing aeration system,
renovation of existing blowers, renovation of three existing dissolved air flotation thickeners,three new dissolved air flotation
thickeners,and other improvements. These improvements will Increase the secondary capacity from 46 million gallons per
day(mgd)to 80 mgd. The contract also includes a new pump station for the Orange County Water Districts. The plans and
specifications were prepared by Carollo Engineers and the construction contract was awarded to Margate Construction,Inc.
in June 1995. This contract is approximately 30% complete. Change Order No.4 is an addition in the amount of$24,733.00
to the contract for seven items of additional work and four credit items. There is no time extension for this change order. The
following is a summary of the contract:
Original Contract Price $ 35,291,000.00
Previously Authorized Changes $ (397,726.00)
This Change(Add)(13eddct) $ 24,733.00
Change Orders to Date $ (372,993.00)
Percentage Increase/Decrease (1.06)%
Amended Contract Price $ 34,918,007.60
Value Engineering Credits $ 271,323.00
The following table summarizes the Change Order. For additional details on individual Hems,see the attached Change
Order:
ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DAYS TYPE
1 Revise switchgear power bus design. $35,502 0 Design Change
2 Provide transmitters for flowmeters in DAFTs. 10.463 0 Design Change
3 Provide power source to new District furnished control panel. 14,059 0 Omission
4 Relocate a conduit. 5,191 0 Design Change
5 Provide power source to the water heater in the DAFT control 4.525 0 Omission
room.
6 Revise clarifier outlet box and provide grating. 2.630 0 Omission
7 Provide a floor drain at DAFT. 997 0 Omission
8 Delete double gasketed joint in concrete pipe. (24,000) 0 Design Change
9 Delete power source to the blower automatic roll fitters. (13,903) 0 Design Change
10 Reroute the drain piping for the new clarifiers. (8,631) 0 Design Change
11 Delete the programming computer for the project 12,100) 0 Design Change
TOTAL-Change Order No.4 24,733 0
Items 1 and 3 were due to design errors,the errors were discovered before construction. As a result, the additional cost for
these items shown here would have otherwise been addressed In the original contract. Liquidated Damages on this contract
are $1,000.00 per day and there are no bonus provisions.
TDH:Ih
c: Department Head
AGM-Administration
AGM-Operations
General Manager
Page 2 of 2
J:IWPDOCIENGIP1-36-2WT WPO
Page 1 of 6
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Margate Construction C.O. No.: Four (4)
Date: Sept. 25, 1996
Job: Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. Pt-36-2
Amount of this Change Order(Add)(Bedaet) $24,733.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract
work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from
the contract price are hereby approved.
ITEM 1 - LOAD BREAK SWITCH REVISIONS AT TRANSFORMERS TTt AND TT2
This item revises the load break switches to Transformers TT1 and TT2 shown on Contract Drawing
1 E03 and revises current limiting devices on the Load Interrupting Switchgear specified in Detailed
Specification 66-0540. The item also includes additional conduit, wire, and testing necessary for the
new equipment. The original load break switch design would incorrectly tie plant 12 KV electrical buses
A and B together creating an unsafe condition. Revised short circuit rating parameters require current
limiting modifications to provide adequate protection for the transformers. This item was negotiated
with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH
P 1362-10)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $35,502.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 2-ADD TRANSMITTERS TO RECYCLE FLOW METERS AT DAF THICKENERS
This item is for providing transmitters for three existing recycle flowmeters in Dissolved Air Flotation
Thickener(DAFT) Nos. 1, 2, and 3 and adding transmitters to three proposed recycle flowmeters in
DAFT Nos. 4, 5, and 6. The work includes conduit and wire modifications to provide the transmitter
signals to Control Panel CP-SCP4. The transmitters were requested by the Maintenance Department
and will allow remote computer monitoring and recording of recycle flow. The original contract did not
require transmitters for the recycle flowmeters. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant
to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH P1362-6,6a)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER REM: $10,463.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Page 2 of 6
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9272MI27
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Margate Construction C.O. No.: Four(4)
Date: Sept. 25, 1996
Job: Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1. Job No. Pt-36-2
ITEM 3-TURBINE GENERATOR FUEL OIL PUMP CONTROLS
This item is for additional wire, conduit, and modifications to Motor Control Center Q necessary to
install a Districts-fumished Turbine Fuel Oil Pump Control Panel CP-TL The new panel replaces
controls removed during the demolition of the engine control panels for Blower Nos. 1 and 2 as
indicated on Contract Drawing 2E01. This item does not include stainless steel tubing for
pneumatic controls which will be accomplished in the future by force account. This item was
negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section IM(B)2(a) of the General Provisions.
(Reference: FCO P1362-04)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 14.059.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 4- RAISE CONDUIT IN TUNNEL 11
This item is for relocating a temporary five-inch conduit installed as shown on Section F on Contract
Drawing 1E05 in Tunnel No. 11 where it interferes with the installation of Waste Activated Sludge pipe
shown on Section J on Contract Drawing 1M02. The temporary conduit will be left in place until after
project closeout as part of a interum solution to provide adequate short circuit ratings to electrical
equipment in the plant. This item was accomplished by Contractors force account pursuant to Section
10.6(B)2(b)of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1362-09)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 5191.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 5- WATER HEATER CONDUIT AND WIRE
This item is for providing conduit, wire, and the necessary modificatibns to Motor Control Center MA to
provide power to the water heater in Room R603 of the Dissolved Air Flotation Thickener Control Room
shown on Contract Drawing 6A01. The electrical requirements were omitted from the electrical
drawings. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General
Provisions. (Reference: PCH P1362-04)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $4,525.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Page 3 of 6
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9272"127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Margate Construction C.O. No.: Four (4)
Date: Sept. 25. 1996
Job: Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1. Job No, P1-36-2
ITEM 6- MISCELLANEOUS REVISIONS AT SECONDARY CLARIFIERS
This item is for revising the east side secondary clarifier outlet box shown on Section D on Contract
Drawing 4SO7 to allow space for construction shoring between an existing electrical duct bank and the
box. This item also provides a traffic rated grating for the scum sump shown on Plan B on Contract
Drawing 4SO6 and new grating to cover an opening at the west side secondary effluent channel outlet
box shown on Plan A on Drawing 4M01. The original drawings required a standard treadplate cover for
the scum sump which is located in a traffic area. The drawings omitted the grating required for the
opening at the west side outlet box. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section
1D-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH P1362-019)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $2,630.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: OCalendar Days
ITEM 7- DISSOLVED AIR FLOTATION THICKENER DRAIN
This item is for providing a four-inch floor drain at the southeast comer of the Dissolved Air Flotation
Thickener gallery floor routed to a proposed sump shown on Contract Drawing 6M08. Additional work
includes one floor drain, pipe, concrete encasement and drainage groove modifications. This item
was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions.
(Reference: FCO P1362-023)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 997.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 8- REVISE SECONDARY EFFLUENT PIPE JOINTS
This item is for revising the joint detail for the 72-inch reinforced concrete pipe from a Type III double
gasketed joint as detailed in Standard Drawing S-042 to a Type I single gasketed joint detailed in
Standard Drawing 5-042. The pipe is low pressure and double gasketed joints are not necessary.
This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General
Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1362-014)
CREDIT AMOUNT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ (24.000.00)
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Page 4 of 6
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728.8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Maraate Construction C.O. No.: Four(4)
Dale: Sept. 25, 1996
Job: Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-36-2
ITEM 9- BLOWER LOCAL CONTROL PANEL CONDUIT AND WIRE REVISIONS
This item deletes conduit and wire providing power to the blower automatic roll filters replaced with
panel type filters by Change Order No. 3, Item 2. The wiring is not needed with the panel filters. The
item also deletes conduit and wire routed between the Blower Building Main Control Panel CP-BB and
the four blower local control panels shown on Contract Drawings 2E05 and 2E06. This conduit and
wire is replaced with one Modbus Plus cable and conduit. This item was negotiated with the
Contractor pursuant to Section 10.6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions.
(Reference: PCH P1362-014)
CREDIT AMOUNT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ (13,903.00)
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 10 - REVISED SECONDARY CLARIFIER DRAIN
This item deletes both the underground 8-inch clarifier drain connecting the new east side clarifier drain
to the OAF facility drain system and the new west side clarifier drain to the proposed scum sump. This
item includes connection of the new east and west side clarifier drains to their respective existing
clarifier drains located in the clarifier gallery. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to
Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1362-022, PCH P1362-02)
CREDIT AMOUNT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ (8,631.00)
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 11 - DELETE PROGRAMMING COMPUTER
This item deletes the programming computer specified in Detailed Specification 67-0561. Districts will
provide a more powerful computer to be used for project programming. This item was negotiated with
the Contractor pursuant to Section 10.6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1362-
032)
CREDIT AMOUNT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ (2,100.00)
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
TOTAL AMOUNT THIS CHANGE ORDER: $24.733.00
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days
Page 5 of 6
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9272M127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Margate Construction C.O. No.: Four(4)
Date: Sept. 25, 1996
Job: Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-36-2
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work
and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by
this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required
for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or
damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by
this Change Order.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date: September 18, 1995
Original Contract Time: 900 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date: March 5, 1998
Time Extension this C.O.: 0 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension: 0 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time: Not Applicable
Revised Final Completion Due Date: Not Applicable
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable
Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable
Original Contract Price $35,291,000.00
Prev. Authorized Changes $ (397,726.001
This Change (Add)(Deduet) $ 24 733.00
Amended Contract Price $34,918,007.00
Page 6 of 6
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Mamate Construction C.O. No.: Four(4)
Date: Sept. 25, 1996
Job: Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. Pt-36-2
Board Authorization Dale: September 25, 1996
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
itled by: Reviewed by:
onstmetion Manager Date Engineering Manager Date
Apprord by: Approved a o Form:
�• b'-Ta-9` buArgl7r,
,R'Di ctor of Engineering Date Gene I Counsel Date
Accepted by:
MARGATE CONSTRU
Contractor C.THOMAS NIEGEIHDIN Dale
PRESIDENT
AGENDA
a c� mFo.aEM a
Ill COMYACTlOfJ.trEN ITEM
TRANSMITTAL m .. .
{NONCONS�m "
UQPu.�.ICHEARIt�
J�am���✓ �/�.605.M1F_ETpfG DFTE
T.Bf)6.:.GENDA ITEM
tp.
MEETING DATE COME.!.ID.NO. DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION�ZL (InNals of Originator)
OMITS: CtATS
PDC:989E l
FAHR: FAHft _
EXEC
EXEC ALL 3730 Tom Dawes, Ext. 5080
: STEER
STEER:
JT.BDS:9.2596 DMsian No.,Name,and Erierlsion
AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED WITH PHASE II AND III OF THE STRATEGIC PLAN INCLUDING
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (ALL DISTRICTS):
PDC Committee Recommended Actionfsl: 1. Proceed with Phase II (Treatment, Reuse and Disposal Facilities)
and authorize staff to solicit proposals and negotiate a final PSA for said work.
2. Direct staff to proceed with Phase III (Programmatic Environmental Impact Report) and authorize staff to solicit
proposals and negotiate a PSA for said work.
Staff Recommended Action(sl: The Engineering Department requests authority to proceed with the remaining
work on the Strategic Plan including authority to negotiate Addendum No. 1 to PSA With Camp Dresser& McKee
for Phase II, Treatment, Reuse and Disposal Facilities, and Request for Proposals and negotiate a Professional
Services Agreement(PSA) for Preparation of Programmatic Environmental Impact Report, Phase III.
CEOA REVIEW: Project is Exempt: NO DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC REM:
Date Notice of Exemption Filed:
Negative Declandlon Approved on New EIR will be prepared
Final Ell Approved on_and Nolke of Determination filed on_ March P7,false
FUNDS BUDGETED: Total: $905,000 CURRENT YEAR CURRENT YEAR-To- YEAR-TO43ATE TOTAL REVISED
SOURCE: CORF BUDGET AMOUNT DATE EXPENDITURES BUDGET BALANCE PROJECT COST
September B,Page 7,D.I.d and D.l.e Phase ll $100,000 $100,000 $750,000
AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: Phase III 5.000 $0,00 5,000 155,000
Scheduldl Item: Total $105,000 $105.000 $905,000
WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO CONSISTENT WITH BOARD POLICY? YES
If YES,state number: _Permanent Limited Term
CONCURRENCE ATTACHMENTS TO AGENDA(list)
e Dtla
hdvio ( TO Cemmelea: 1. Budget lnlorrnalion Tebl¢
SlgnaNre Dale
Department Head(Or Dedill
elk4 .1t'&* J». 9,lll To JL Bol 1 Budget Information Table
%ighsure K/� Date
Assistant General Manager(Or Designee)
J:\WPDOCIPDC96\SEPUB01 Page 1 of 3
SsOR
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (Background and/or Summary)
The information presented below is the basis for the recommendation made by staff to the PDC Committee. The PDC
Committee, after discussion of the staffs recommendation,is recommending to the Board of Directors that staff proceed with
Phase II of the Strategic Plan by soliciting proposals,selecting a qualified firm and negotiating a Professional Services
Agreement.
As the Directors are aware,the Districts are now preparing a new Strategic Plan. Phase I,which includes three projects,
investigation of our ocean outfall,determination of peak discharges and a financial study,is now underway. Staff proposes
to start the remaining work, Phases II and III,at this time. Phase II Includes the study of capital and operational treatment
plant issues and reuse of wastewater and biosolids. Phase III includes public participation and the preparation of a
programmatic EIR.
Staff believes that it will be most advantageous to negotiate with Camp Dresser&McKee(CDM)to perform the Phase II
work. CDM has considerable experience in doing similar work with other agencies nationwide and is doing an excellent job In
their portion of Phase I work. COM's Phase I work includes determination of peak hydraulic discharges,ways to reduce
those peak Rows and financial studies to determine fair and equitable charges for both capital and operational requirements.
Much of the work that CDM has completed has direct bearing on needed work for Phase II and,therefore,R is believed that
this will be the most efficient way to achieve a quality product. Additionally,a new engineering firm would add tremendously
to staff requirements in management of this project.
Phase III is the preparation of a Program EIR,including the required public participation. The Districts'Program EIR must
emphasize the effects of the Districts'wastewater program on the marine environment and there are only a few firms
considered qualified to do this very specialized work. Staff proposes to send a Request for Proposal(RFP)to a'short list"
and negotiate a professional services agreement with the most qualified firm.
If the Directors approve staffs recommendation to negotiate with CDM for Phase II of this Strategic Plan,and send RFPs to a
short list for Phase III of the Strategic Plan,final Scopes of Work will be prepared and negotiations held for a Professional
Services Agreement. The PSA will be returned to the Committee and Boards of Directors for final approval.
The funds budgeted for this fiscal year($105,000)will not be sufficient to conduct the work anticipated. Therefore,a budget
adjustment will be requested when the PSAs are brought forward to the PDC Committee and Boards of Directors for
approval.
urWr00Cw0C96vseP\96o1. Page 2 of 3
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
TASK BUDGET FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED
(ADOPTED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL COMPLETE TO
BY CORF) TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZED DATE
FUNDS
Phase II of $750,000 $0.00 -0- -0- -0-
Strategic Plan
Phase III of $155.000 W00 -0- -0- -0-
Strategic Plan
TMD:dIlmf
c: Department Head
AGM-Administration
AGM-Operabons
General Manager
J:\WPDOC\PDC96%SEPW01 Page 3 of 3
ReN wWM
For Bd.Sco Vae Qd AGENDA
GOMA.ACTON EM ITEM
TRANSMITTAL
e+Ti
CI �PUkJG HEA4".T3 . ..
PXT,BD .NEE yDATE
JT ED...6G
MEETING DATE Cori",10.NO. DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION - (Inilwkol Onginator)
OMITS:
PDC:9/5/96 PDC ��
FAHR: FAHfi
EXEC: STEER ALL 3720,Wendy Sevenandt,5058
STEER: Division No.,Name,and Extension
JT.BDS:925/96
AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
Agenda Wording:
AMENDMENT NO.3 TO MODIFICATIONS TO ELECTRICAL AND CONTROL SYSTEMS AND PROCESS EVALUATIONS
AT PLANT NO. 1,JOB NO. P1-40-1.AND MODIFICATIONS TO ELECTRICAL AND CONTROL SYSTEMS AND PROCESS
EVALUATIONS AT PLANT NO.2,JOB NO.P247-1 (All Districts):The Engineering Department and the Director of
Engineering requests that the Professional Services Agreement with Lee&Ro Consulting Engineers ,Inc., be amended
providing for additional engineering services for design changes at an increase of$76,801.00.
Recommended Action(s):
Approve Amendment No.3 to the Professional Services Agreement with Lee&Ro Consulting Engineers,Inc.,increasing the
contract amount to$1,247,967.00.
CEOA REVIEW: Project is Exempt: Yes MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM:
Dale Notice of Exemption Filed-12H Sle3
11&93
FUNDS BUDGETED: Total: $23,918,000 CURRENTYEAR CURRENT YEAR-TO- YEAR-TOLATE TOTAL REVISED
SOURCE: CORF BUDGETAMOUNT DATE EXPENDITURES BUDGET BALANCE PROJECT COST
ScheduldLine Item:Section 8,pages 4&5,A.5.b.,
A.S.a,B.S.a.,8.4.a. $650,000 $0 $650,000 $23.918,000
AMOUNT OF TRANSFER:
SchedulerUre It.
WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO CONSISTENT WITH BOARD POLICY? YES
If YES,state number: _Permanent Umeed Terrn
CONCURRENCES: / ATTACHMENTS TO AGENDA(List)
Signature D Is
Division M r Designee) To Committee: 1. Budget In(onretion Table
8-ss-jr"
Signature Date
Department ed
— 1 To Jt.atls.: t.
signature glate
Assistant General Manager(Or Designee)
u
• , � . Y
..��& _, ... .Y= ,e...�., F..,.,�'t=a:. � .. ..,..'= Sd3 -. . }'•U�`,Y l.'..a....x
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION(BaokgramE an4/or Summary)
The 12 kV Distribution Support Facilities at Plant No. 1,Job No.P147,is included in a PSA with Lee&Ro Consulting
Engineers, Inc.,for the design of four jobs containing miscellaneous projects. See the attached Budget Information Table for
a summary of the cost information pertinent to each job of the PSA. This addendum requests additional funds for only one of
the four jobs,Job No.P1-47.
Job No.P1-47 will convert the power feed from Southern California Edison Company to the Central Generation Facility for
the Control Center,Administration Building and Central Laboratory. The other support facilities; Auto Shop,maintenance
buildings,and Warehouse;will be supplied with new power feeds to relieve some of the load on Power Building No.4.
Additionally,the original project includes work at the Central Laboratory to separate critical loads from non-critical loads and
to provide increased power reliability for the critical loads by installing an uninterruptable power supply(UPS).
The general philosophy regarding 12 kV distribution has been discussed by staff at some length. Over the years,the
Districts'philosophy has evolved significantly in terms of the type of switching equipment(manual load break switches,
electric motor operated switches,and full-featured air circuit breakers)and in terms of the environmental requirements for
the 12 kV electrical switching equipment(indoor versus outdoor).
Staff recommends that the current project be revised to incorporate the proposed electrical distribution equipment in a new
power building,to be consistent with the recent 12 kV electrical distribution philosophy employed at the Districts. Some of the
latest projects consistent with this approach include Power Building 5 and 6 at Plant 1 and Distribution Center`C"at Plant 2.
The concept of housing electrical gear in a power building will also enable maintenance staff to employ maintenance
procedures which are consistent with our other electrical distribution facilities. Their training and qualifications better support
working on indoor equipment. The Districts also intends to design and install a load demand management system in the
near future. The proposed design changes will accommodate these future design requirements.
Other proposed changes to the scope of the design are the result of a system evaluation after the November failure of the
Control Center UPS. Since completion of the Control Center and the process monitoring and control computer system,
additional computer equipment has been relocated or added to the computer room in the Control Center. These computers
and related equipment support the Laboratory, Computerized Maintenance Management System,and Operations Process
Computer(CRISP). Due to the critical nature of these computerized applications,the existing power distribution and power
conditioning system at the Control Center is not adequate.
The proposed changes to the Consultant's scope of work include the design of a new power building with indoor electrical
power distribution equipment and a centrally located power distribution network,an evaluation of UPS options for the Control
Center and design of the UPS and an additional source of power to the new equipment in the Control Center. Providing
indoor electrical distribution equipment and a building will add an estimated$385,000 to the original construction estimate of
$2,440,000. Providing the new UPS at the Control Center will add an estimated$175,000 to the project construction cost.
The proposed design changes will increase the original construction estimate from$2,440,000 to$3,000,000. Switching
from Edison to Central Generation power supply will yield an annual cost savings estimated at$150,000 per year.
As a result of their previous work an this project, Lee&Ro understands the building loads,electrical distribution and conduit
and cable routing issues. They have field-investigated the existing conduit and cable routing. They have also performed the
research and written the specification for the rotary UPS which is an alternative for the Control Center UPS improvements.
WS:dI
c: Department Head
AGM-Administration
AGM-Operations
General Manager
J:OP000IPDC961SEPU 02. Page 2 of 2
Revision: 811/96
AGENDA
P eYc ,�rE� ITEM
mm
CTION
TRANSMITTAL
I � T
MEETING DATECOMM.ID-NO. DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION (InPlab of Onginxtor)
OMTS: ,'OMTS
PDC:9/5/96 POOL
FAHR: "' +"FAHR 3720,Wendy Sevenandt,5058
EXEC:9/18/96 Q' ^„�- ,,,,; All
STEER: {Y ,^ ° "� a Diviso,No.,Name.and ElOerolon
JT.BDS:925/96 , c ,
AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
Agenda Wording:
JOB NO. P7-00-2 (REBID),FACILITY MODIFICATIONS AND SAFETY UPGRADES AT PLANT NO. 1, AND JOB NO.
P247-2(REBID), FACILITY MODIFICATIONS AND SAFETY UPGRADES AT PLANT NO.2(All Districts): The Director of
Engineering requests that a construction contract be awarded IS miscellaneous tasks for operational and Safety related
improvements to the treatment plants. The PDC Committee and Executive Committee reviewed the proposed actions by the
Joint Boards at their meeting of September 25, 1996 in response to a protest letter from Margate Construction, Inc. protesting
the bid of Pascal 8 Ludwig Engineers.
Recommended Action(s):
1)Approve Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications correcting the date for receipt of bids;2) Receive and file letter
dated August 21,1996 from Margate Construction,Inc. protesting the bid of Pascal and Ludwig Engineers; 3) Receive and
file memoranda from General Counsel dated September 10, 1996 and September 17, 1996;
-AND-
4) Reject protest of Margate Construction,Inc.;5)Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation;and 6)Award
contract to Pascal 8 Ludwig Engineers for Job Nos. Pt-40-2(Rebid)and P247-2(Rebid),in a total amount of
$1,878.437.00;
-OR-
7)Accept protest of Margate Construction,Inc.,declaring Pascal and Ludwig Engineers are ineligible to bid pursuant to Public
Contract Code Section 5105;and 8)Award contract to Margate Construction, Inc.,second lowest bidder,for Job Nos.
P140-2(Rebid)and P2-47-2 (Rebid),in a total amount of$1,900,000.00.
CEQA REVIEW: Projeel Is Exempt: Yes DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM:
Dale Notke of Exemption Filed:1 VIU93
724/96
BUDGET INFORMATION CURRENTYEAR CURRENT YEAR- YEAR-TO43ATE REYISEDBUDGET
TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.: $3,673,000 BUDGET AMOUNT TO-DATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL
SOURCE: CORF,Sectione,pages485 EXPENDITURESSchodu Rmi6.avm pw ln.��.t
AMOUNT OF llem:A.FER 8.6.a. $1,600,000 $0 $1,600,000 $3,673,000
AMOUNT OFTRANSFER:
SchedulelLine Item:
AIT/PROJECT COST INFORMATION ORIGINAL BID,PO, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED PROJECT
CONTRACT FUNDS PREV. REQUESTED THIS AMOUNT
AMOUNT APPROVED AT
$1,878,437.00
WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? NO
If YES,state numEer. _Permanent Limited Term II VES,e�laln In ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section
CONCURRENCES' ATTACHMENTS TO AGENDA(List)
Q If /a nj To Committee: 1. Letter dated August 21, 1996,from
d 7L' Margate Construction,Inc.
Si ature Da0 2. Memorandum dated September 10,
' on M n er estgn 1996,from General Counsel regarding
Bid Protest
3. Memorandum dated September 10,
Signature Data 1996,from General Counsel regarding
Depart a �(Dr Igoe Bid Protest Appeal by Margate
Construction
Signature ate 10 it, Ms.: 1. Letter dated August 21, 1996,from
Assistant General Manager(Or Designee) Margate Construction,Inc.
2. Memorandum dated September 10,
1996,from General Counsel regarding
Bid Protest
3. Memorandum dated September 10,
1996,from General Counsel regarding
Bid Protest Appeal by Margate
Construction
4. Memorandum dated September 17,
1996,from General Counsel regarding
Bid Protest
5. Bid Tabulation and Recommendation
OMTS COMM. PDC COW. FAHR COMM; JOINT BOARDS
Mccbng Date.
.Approved:
Amended _
FOTYIatded ttll,F '.:
i WPDOOIAGENDAWITS-96V3EPT1J 2R BIF Page 2 of
Revision: ea?M6
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION(Background and/or Summary)
On May 21, 1996,four bids were received with a low bid of$1,644,000.00 submitted by Pascal and Ludwig Engineers. In
Pascal& Ludwig's review of their bid following the bid opening,they found a clerical error in tabulating their costs associated
with the project and formally requested that their bid be removed from consideration for this project. This request was
reviewed with District's counsel,who concluded that the error qualifies for bidder relief under the criteria of Public Contract
Code Section 5103. The second lowest bidder,Advanco Constructors,submitted a bid of$1,882,036.00 which was
$238,036,or 14%higher than the low bid,and over the Engineers estimate of$1,700,000. Staff recommended rejecting all
bids,rebidding the job to clarify technical information within the original scope of work and amendment of the original scope
of work to add and delete items of work.
Staff recommended and the Boards of Directors approved at the July 24, 1996 meeting the request of Pascal &Ludwig
Engineers for withdrawal of their bid and exonerated the bid bond submitted in connection with said bid. The Boards also
authorized the rebid of the contract with a revised Engineers estimate of$1,900,000(an increase of 12%).
Following the bid rejection in May,the staff made the following key changes to the bid plans and specifications:
• There was a significant change in philosophy regarding the use of the Hazardous Waste Materials Lockers at Plant No.
1. The Districts originally proposed to use the lockers for storage only of hazardous waste materials. The Districts
revised the proposed use to include dispensing and storage of the material within the lockers. Dispensing of chemicals
falls under specific code requirements for open containers and human occupancy of the lockers and the design was
revised to include these code requirements. These code requirements state that the locker must have forced
mechanical ventilation which uses Class 1,Division 1, explosion proof motorized fans,ducting to draw vapors away from
human occupancy,strengthened walls and explosion relief panels,and automatic controls for isolation of the locker in
the event of a fire. Further review of the original lockers proposed in the first bid led to an improved layout for the
workers. The revised design combined four separate small lockers into one compartmentalized locker and adjusted the
size, location and access to the large flammable/combustable materials locker. The estimated construction cost
increase for these design changes was$50.000.
• During the original bid period,the design consultant was completing the design of ventilation improvements to the locker
rooms at Building No.6. This ventilation improvement was being fast-tracked for separate bid to support the relocation
of the Safety Division to Building No.6. The installation of ventilation for the locker rooms was included in the rebid for
ease of project management and economy of scale(a separate task at the Truck Loading Facility at Plant No.1 has
ventilation improvements). The estimated construction cost increase for this addition is$34,000,
• A small project design for another ventilation improvement had concurrently been completed by Carollo Engineers at the
time of the original bid. This completed design was incorporated into the plans and specifications for the rebid of this
project for ease of project management and economy of scale (two separate tasks,one at the Truck Loading Facility at
Plant No. 1 and one at the North Scrubber Complex at Plant No.2 have similar ventilation fan and ductwork
improvements). The estimated construction cost increase for this addition is$30,000.
The revised plans and specifications also included clarifications of technical details in the original project and deletion of
work tasks including deletion of a liner under a concrete pad for 90-day hazardous waste storage lockers(cost savings),
clarification of the specification for a patio structure (cost savings),a change to the requirement for reinforcement of
fiberglass reinforced plastic ducting (cost savings), clarification to structural aluminum coating thickness(cost savings),and
deletion of the removal of abandoned gas compressors and centrifuge which were removed by the Purchasing Department
during the original bid period (cost savings).
On August 21, 1996,Margate Construction sent a letter to the Districts protesting the bid of Pascal and Ludwig, asserting that
the scope of work was essentially unchanged in the re-bid. The letter from Margate Construction did not address the impact
of the changes to the original work tasks as described above.
The changes made to the original specifications are material in staffs opinion. These changes resulted in a substantial
Increase in the cost of the project as outlined above.
WS:dYmf
c: Department Head
AGM-Administration
AGM-Operations
General Manager
J:WPDOC1AGENDAv11T5-96ZEPT140.2RAIF Page 3 of 3
Revision: 62N96
MARGATE CONSTRUCTION, ING
25009 SOUTH RGU EROA STREET CARSON, CALIFORNIA TELEPHONE No 131 OI B30.B610
POST OFFICE BOX 950> ZIP CODE 90749 FAX NO.13101 030.9276
August 21, 1996
Orange County Sanitation Districts
Attn: Mr. Donald F. McIntyre
10844 Ellis Avenue
Post Office Box 8127
Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127
Attention: Mr. Donald F. McIntyre
General Manager
Subject: Bid Received August 20, 1996 for:
Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-40-2 (REBID)
Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 2, Job No. P247-2 (REBID)
Dear Mr. McIntyre,
Margate Construction, Inc. bid subject project originally on May 21, 1996 and "REBID' of the
project on August 20, 1996. The apparent low bidder on both occasion was Pascal & Ludwig
Engineers from Ontario, California. Following is a summary of the facts relating to the bidding of
this project loth on May 21, 1996, and on August 20, 1996.
Bid of May 21, 1996
The Engineers Estimate for this project was$1,700,000.00. Pascal & Ludwig Engineers bid was
$1,644,000.00. It is our understanding that Pascal & Ludwig Engineers eHher verbally or in
writting claimed a mistake and asked relief from their bid proposal. Their bid was under the
Engineers Estimate and would have been awarded to them if they had not asked for relief. The
second bidder on this occasion was Advanoo Constructors at $1,882,036.00. It is our
understanding that the project was not awarded to the second bidder because it was over the
Engineers Estimate. The Sanitation Districts decided to re-advertise and take new bids.
Bid of August 20, 1996
The Orange County Sanitation Districts re-advertised subject project as a "REBID"with minor
modifications. The main modification added a ventilation system to the Metering and Diversion
Structure and ventilation improvements at Building No. 1 at Plant No. 1. This modification was
worth less than $40,000,00, and was minor in nature. The miscellaneous modifications made to
the project did not materially change the scope of the project. Pascal & Ludwig Engineers bid the
"REBID" project and was the apparent low bidder at$1,878,437.00.
The Public Contracts Code section 5105 (Prohibition on Participation in Further Bidding) states
"A bidder who claims a mistake or who forfeits his or her bid security shall be prohibited from
participating in future bidding on the project on which the mistake was claimed or security
forfeited."
Mr.Donald F.McIntyre
August 21, 1996 -
Page 2
If the information provided above is correct and we have reason to believe that it is, Margate
Construction, Inc. formally protests the bid of Pascal & Ludwig Engineers for subject project and
asks the Sanitation Districts of Orange County find that the bid of Pascal & Ludwig Engineers was
not legal under the Public Contracts Code.
Very truly yours,
MMARGAT�E CONSTRUCTION, INC.
C. Thomas Riegelhuth
President
CTR:mer
Encl.: Public Contracts, page 482
g 5103 P bLic Cmerat=
C.
Alt,Rehmudm/ar hfntaken Md Pbo dff nim ttd the low lid on a pubi a iob,Fat nwpoend a
dtdmd poan so$11 D,452 boosx 510452.The may.k7VMdg the mar,uevnt ele" the
bld.Haindlf had dwrieinto reselyd,but entefd b®aformal m>Paa.In ordrmteon themno'a4
ti room he an tmdwmsdin be weep the parnes vmnMly rechrd To Yoni g.Hen these vain no
277 P- d638 e7amaoon wn brposs@+ie.Lensage E6.rbic v Carn1'./San 6aaf4n t6 r r Jd 659.
297 Pld t38(1956).
Fvhff u e ofSecrvdy. Forrxf Covemsen Code 4200 perm tied sdfcf beam of a mime in the
bid;phimHwas en ti to sue for the recmesy ofifw ammo fakftmd PlaiatF had Bed a bid bad
inthoamowM of$91,613(TO peeefd;one,these was fnvdfy no^imaaR fafaimr Ceaal desaarn
ssaaurd REVERSED.io teptre an aural(odemae wash(nemamthele�SlaMw arpme demddrg
The psoadimp.Ballwr Aodam CoobW.'mn Coy. v The Rapana o/me Unis emn,o/Card i
80 Cal 4Ao 3d327, 74S QL 17. 498(797B1.
/pocase Bard on A4hvke HaV lovdiid. The®lffW=nude a mipdkn in Its bid. as and on the
r lee, the oxarz ing agexy ioaysed the manna price by f7,000, wkhm rdmnm the cootmta
forcornpeteive bids.NELO.The award of the additenal 57,000 was invalid A p jbhc canna a imald
atless it is (e in acmdxt¢ with the cmpetdiw II'R 9 mvgvir heh¢ Cur v Witcheock, 277
CdApp.2d 334, 76 QLAgy%376(79691.
f 5104 B®gtictg aces Nodme
Other than the mdco to roe pvbtic comy,no d i.rec m to be filed bdore brmgbtg the
accroe.
aF.rwe P 6,Saar f982 t2 af5 2
f 5105 Prohibition on Partidpadon is Further Bid&i g
A bidder wba tta®s a drake w who(oricim his or her bid security stall be ptoht3ud from
partiaeatmg In fumh� bidding uo the project on rhisb she�was chimed m sr ry for-
Cend.
- �vrnm q Sam f9tQ Q 1fJ f 2
Second Bid~,ded Cana sm*m dnkarsnon,.G fthm he was not pedtded from quar&m%
as the Iowest msponnLle bdder by fanner Cavam eiert Cade Section 42DS,.Itdh prdibiaM a biddw
who slimed a mistake from parddpamg in furdw bddeQ,on Qse project for wNch The rrmmke we,
chimed The cynpacmr darned that the job was so cvrgd on de rebid that 4 did not mnaNm
Me sane project AFFIRMED. The mco d bid w no the same project and was thndae binned by
sin.. Cor=bo tbaaVc Ca vPaAama UmnoSchodOcbxc 136 Ca7AppJde6S, 786 CJLRpp.
QJ (7962).
f 5106 t;oea>•C Awaad w Bfddc
If the public mdq den®it is for is bear m evc c,it may,on nsfml w failure of the succendW
bidder to ezmue the e000 ..and u m the sctmd lowea bidder.
Ifthesecwrilorercbidderfats oerdwa meaensre theme the publiceedcytroy likewise
awrd a to,the third I m bidder.
On the faivae or tefival of The scco nd or thud kswea bidder to whom a caoma is so a .tied
to ereeaue it.ids or her bidder's manic,shall be fie wise forfeited.
Min.: ZY b7 Sma 1982 m y3532
f 5107 (,brick Desert>smadan of Amon
In all amass brought under the provisions of tbis dupe r.all coons wherein web acdom arc
or mry hnvftn be persd-&shall give stab actiorn preference over a0 odor civil accons Thereto.
in the mane of setting the same for hearing or trial,and in Fearing the sntse,To the end that a0
such aKmo�—ur shall be g ckly And and dcsemrmed.
M. Essvd bf Sin is'"a fif 32
462 5hepao's/MCGaw+liil (1995)
AUGUST 21, 1996
11:00 a.m.
Bin TARIII ATInN
PROJECT TITLE: JOBS NO. Pi-40-2 REBID AND P2-47-2 REBID
PROJECT
DESCRIPTION: FACILITY MODIFICATIONS AND SAFETY UPGRADES
AT PLANTS NO. 1 AND 2
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE: &1 onn nnn
_ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ TOTAL
CONTRACTOR BID
i. PASCAL & LUDWIG ENGINEERS $1,878,437.00
2. MARGATE CONSTRUCTION, INC. $1,900,000.00
3. ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS $1,956,231.00
4.
5.
6.
7.
B.
9.
10.
I have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible
bid. I, therefore, recommend award to Pascal & Ludwig Engineers in the bid amount of &1 A7R 437 nn
as the lowest and best bid.
C
avid Aavid A. L
Director of Engineering
J:1W PDOC1ENMP1-40-2R1aIDTAB.M
CSDOC 0 P.O.Box 8127 0 FoM.in Valley,CA 92728-8127 0 (714)962-2411
k t
AGENDA
)t;' ITEM
v1
TRANSMITTAL
rr ,
all
S i
MEETING DATE COtAM 10.YSQ q DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION (Inhialsof Ongintar)
ows �MTS - b'Y
PDC' mnms a P t 3790,Bud Palmqulst,Extension 51M
FAHR' L R' ° Derision No.,Name,and Extension
EXEC' E7CEG' \
JTBD S I -
AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
Agenda Wording:
APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NOS. 2 AND 3 TO CONTRACT 3-36R WITH ALBERT W. DAVIES, INC. ;AND
ACCEPT THE CONTRACT AS COMPLETE AND AUTHORIZE EXECUTION OF THE NOTICE OF COMPLETION
AND APPROVE THE FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT. The Construction Manager and Director of Engineering
request approval of Change Order No. 2 providing six items of additional work and Change Order No. 3,
Adjustment of Engineers Quantities and Final Closeout Agreement of the Westminster Avenue Force Main (First
Unit) and new Westside Pump Station Force Main.
Recommended Action(s):
Approve Change Order No. 2 to Contract No. 3-36R with Albert W. Davies, Inc. for an addition of$31,301,55,
approve Change Order No. 3, Adjuslmentnf Engineers Quantities for a deduction of$42,216.00, for a total
contract amount of$3,823,756.55, and approve final Closeout Agreement.
CEQA REVIEW: Project is Exempt: Yea DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM:
Date Notice of Exemption Filed 429.93 7I44196
FUNDS BUDGETED: Total: $4,636,DDD CURRENTYEAR CURRENT YEAR-TO- YEAR-TO4)ATE TOTAL REVISED
SOURCE: DISTRICT 3 C.I.P.;Item 14.Sect.6, BUDGET AMOUNT DATE EXPENDITURES BUDGET BALANCE PROJECT COST
Page 31 $300,000 $60,100 $239'goo $3,823,756.55
WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO CONSISTENT WITH BOARD POLICY? YES
CON RENCES: ATTACHMENTSTO AGENDA(List)
G7 p_2 �` To CommMee: 1. Change Order No.2
�/ G 2. Change Order No.3
sigrature Dale
Division anger(Or Designee)
4 8- --Z--46
re Date ZTo Jt.Bds.: 1. Signed Change Order No.2
Departure Hea (Or esig e)
2. Signed Change Order No.3
Z z i6
Signature Date
Assistant General Manager(Or Designee)
MeaIII�Batec x OMTO COMK"AARYM a� PDGCOMaa :_�`"s:AtBi COzw i Fes: J �\,
A M a3ep 3 n g n ar i ��
J:1W PDO C)EN GQ-36RIA IT.W PO
0
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (Background and/or Summary)
Contract No.3-36R,Replacement of Westminster Avenue Force Main (First Unit) and new Westside Pump Station Force
Main consists of replacing the old 30-inch reinforced plastic mortar pipe(RPMP)force main with a new 424nch ductile iron
pipe force main (approximately 13,700 linear feet)in Westminster Avenue from the Districts Seal Beach Pump Station(C'By of
Seal Beach)to an outlet structure at Hammond Place in the City of Westminster,and the installation of a new 204nch ductile
iron pipe force main within a 304nch diameter steel casing from the Westside Pump Station to a junction structure adjacent to
Old Ranch Parkway. The project was designed by The Keith Companys. The contract was awarded on June 20, 1995 to
Albert W.Davies, Inc. This contract is 100%complete. Change Order No.2 is an addition in the amount of$31,301.55 to the
contract for six items of additional work and 25 calendar days time extension and Change Order No.3 is a deduction of
$42,216 for the Adjustment of Engineer's Quantities. The following is a summary of the contract:
Original Contract Price $3,760,000.00
Previously Authorized Changes $ 74,671.00
Change Order No.2 $ 31,301.55
Change Order No.3 $ (42,216.00)
Change Orders to Date $ 63,756.55
Percentage Increase/Decrease 1.70%
Amended Contract Price $3,823,756.55
The following tables summarize the Change Orders. For additional details on individual items,we attached Change Orders.
CHANGE ORDER NO.2
REM NO. DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DAYS TYPE
1 Removal of undisclosed sheet piling $11.541.77 8 Changed Condition
2 Removal of undadosed excess concrete encasement 12,532.74 10 Changed Condition
3 Removal of undsdosed reinforced concrete storm drain and 1.878.05 3 Changed Condition
flinch water fine
4 Removal of undisclosed concrete storm drain box 464.32 1 Changed Condition
5 Removal of undisclosed concrete piling 2,072.77 1 Changed Condition
6 Removal of electrical duct bank 2,811.90 2 Changed Condition
TOTAL-Change Order No.2 $31,301.55 25
CHANGE ORDER NO.3
REM NO. DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DAYS TYPE
1 Adjustment of Engineers Quantities-ADD $16.785 0 Other
1 Adjustment of Engineers Quantities-DEDUCT (59,001) 0 Other
TOTAL-Change Order No.3 $(42,216) 0
There is a total of 67 calendar days time extension for Change Order No.1 and No.2. Liquidated damages on this contract
are$500 per day and there are no bonus provisions. The time extensions am not subject to Liquidated Damages.
eP:lh
c: Department Head
AGM-Administration
AGM-Operations
General Manager
Page 2 of 2
J:\W PDOC\ENG11.36R%IT.W PD
Page 1 of 5
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
108"ELLIS AVENUE,P.O.BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Albert W.Davies,Inc. C.O. No.: Two(2)
Date: September 25, 1996
Job: Replacement of Westminster Avenue Force Main(First Unit)and Westside PumD Station Force Main
Contract No. 3-36R
Amount of this Change Order(Add)(Deduct) $31,301.55
In accordance with contract provisions,the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are
hereby authorized,and as compensation,the following additions to or deductions from the contract price
are hereby approved.
ITEM 1 -REMOVAL OF UNDISCLOSED AND ABANDONED IN-PLACE SHEET PILING
Between Station Number 89+76 and 89+20 abandoned sheet piling in-place had to be removed form the trench
zone during the construction of new 42-inch D.I.P.line. The conflict with the sheet piling was caused by the design
alignment being in direct conflict with an existing United States Navy metering structure. By altering the design
alignment to avoid the metering structure,R created a subsequent conflict with the above driven steel sheet piling.
It is Staffs opinion that this is not a design error. The as-built information received from the USN did not provide
sufficient structural detail of the substructure geometric configuration to allow the designer to avoid the conflict.
The abandoned steel sheet piling was not shown on the contract drawings but was shown on the as-built drawings
for Contract No. 3-13-1,Westminster Avenue Force Main,Second Unit. This sheet piling was installed under
Contract No, 3-13-1 to protect the existing 30-inch Unit No, 1 Force Main and the construction notes stated that R
was to be abandoned in-place. This Rem of work was accomplished by contractor's force account pursuant to
Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $11,541.77
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 8 Calendar Days
ITEM 2 -REMOVAL OF UNDISCLOSED EXCESS CONCRETE ENCASEMENT
Between Station Numbers 114+37 to 114+84(westside of Bolas Chica Channel crossing)and Station numbers
116+07 to 116+87 (eastside of channel),the contract plans called for the removal of concrete encasement
around an existing 304nch steel pipe. During installation of the new 42-inch steel pipe within the above reaches,
the contractor encountered concrete encasement that was well in excess of the removal limits disclosed in the
profile of the contract documents. In addition,the encasement in the vicinity of the thrust blocks included concrete
piers with I-beams that had to be removed. This was not indicated on the contract documents. This Rem of work
was accomplished by contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b)of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $12,532.74
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 10 Calendar Days
Page 2 of 5
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Albeit W. Davies, Inc. C.O.No.: Two(2)
Date: September 25. 1996
Job: Replacement of Westminster Avenue Force Main(First Unit)and Westside Pump Station Force Main
Contract No.3-36R
ITEM 3-REMOVAL OF UNDISCLOSED REINFORCED CONCRETE STORM DRAIN BOX AND AN 8-INCH
WATERLINE
At Station Number 117+30 the contract plans showed an abandoned 8-Inch water line that did not cross the
trench zone of the new 42-Inch ductile iron pipe. During excavation of the trench in this area,R was determined
that this line encroached into the trench zone and had to be cut and removed. The contractor incurred down time
to locate the line(potholing)and to determine if R was still live. In addition at Station No.117+10 the contractor
had to install bulkheads on an undisclosed and abandoned Tx 6'stonn drain box that crossed the trench. This
was not shown on the contract documents. This Rem of work was accomplished by contractor's force account
pursuant to Section 10.6(B)2(b)of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,878.05
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 3 Calendar Days
ITEM 4-REMOVAL OF UNDISCLOSED CONCRETE STORM DRAIN BOX
At Station Number 137+40,the contractor was directed to remove and place a bulkhead on an abandoned Tx 5'
storm drain box that encroached Into the trench zone. In addition the contractor experienced production delays
and required an adjustment to his planned work. This box structure was not shown on the contract documents.
This item of work was accomplished by contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General
Provision.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 464.32
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 1 Calendar Day
ITEM 5-REMOVAL OF UNDISCLOSED CONCRETE PILING
At Station Number 11+55 located just outside the valve vault of the Seal Beach Pump Station,a concrete pier with
an I-beam was in direct conflict with the grade of the new 424nch ductile iron pipe force main. The contractor
removed the concrete pier and incurred delays in mainline production. This I-beam was abandoned in-place
during construction of the old 30-inch Techile force main, It was used as a support for a kicker during the air
testing of the line. This Rem was not shown on the contract documents. This Rem of work was accomplished by
contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b)of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $2,07277
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 1 Calendar Day
Page 3 of 5
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
108"ELLIS AVENUE, P.O.BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Albert W.Davies. Inc. C.O. No.: Two(2)
Date: September 25, 1996
Job: Replacement of Westminster Avenue Force Main(First Unll)and Westside Pump Station Force Main
Contract No. 3-36R
ITEM 6-REMOVAL OF ELECTRICAL DUCT BANK
The contractor was directed to alter the design grade of the new 424nch ductile iron pipe force main at Station
Number 19+25 to avoid a conflict with a 1'x4'electdcal duct bank. This duct bank was not accurately shown on
the contract documents. It was shown to be approrimately 1.5 feet above the 42-inch line,but in the field it was
determined to have zero clearance over the crown of the pipe. In addition, the contractor incurred production
delays. This hem of work was accomplished by contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b)of the
General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $2,811.90
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 2 Calendar Days
TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $31,301.55
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 25 Calendar Days
Page 4 of 5
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE,P.O.BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Albert W. Davies, Inc. C.O.No.: Two(2)
Date: September 25, 1996
Job: Replacement of Westminster Avenue Force Main(First Unit)and Westside Pump Station Force Main
Contract No. 3-36R
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within
the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously
issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 25 days extension of time is required to perform the
work that s required for this Change Order, but that no direct or indirect,incidental or consequential costs,
expenses,losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor,except as expressly granted and
approve by this Change Order.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date: June 20,1995
Original Contract Time: 360 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date: June 13, 1996
Time Extension this C.O.: 25 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension: 67 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time: 427 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date: August 18, 1996
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable
Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable
Original Contract Price $3,760,000.00
Prev.Authorized Changes $ 74,671.00
This Change(Add)(Bednd) $ 31,301.55
Amended Contract Price $3,865,972.55
Page 5 of 5
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Albert W. Davies, Inc. C.O. No.: Two (2)
Date: September 25. 1996
Job: Replacement of Westminster Avenue Force Main(F st Unil)and Wastside Pump Station Force Main
Contract No. 3-36R
Board Authorization Date: September 25, 1996
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
tried by: Reviewed bye
� ,��• �<-. �-e✓-mod � °: ; C
onstruction Manager Date Engineering Manager Date
Appr 1d�by: Appprrooved as to Form
:ML
�`E , ep— —A (: \ 91 ?#,,6
Dlrotorof Engineering Date GefteptilCounsel Date
Accepted by:
ALBERT W.DAMES,INC.
Contractor ' Date
Page 1 of 3
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
108"ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Albert W. Davies, Inc. C.O. No.: Three (3)
Date: September 25, 1996
Job: Replacement of Westminster Force Main (First Unit) and Westside Pump Station Force
Main Contract No. 3-36R
Amount of this Change Order(Add)(Deduct) $ (42,216.00)
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract
work are hereby authorized, and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from
the contract price are hereby approved.
ITEM 1 -ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S QUANTITIES
ADD: Change in Quantity
Item No. Unit Description From To Difference Unit Price Total
19. L.F. 20-in DIP FM 33 38 5 $720.00 $3,600.00
(NRJT)
23. L.F. 30-in dia.Steel 70 99.30 29.30 $450.00 $13,185.00
casing w/20in
DIP carrier pipe
SUBTOTAL: $16,785.00
DEDUCT: Change in Quantity
Item No. Unit Description From To Difference Unit Price Total
8. LS. Inst.Diversion GL 100% 25% 75% $20,000.00 $15,000.00
to JT.Structure
17. Ton Asphalt concrete 800 565 235 $ 43.00 $10,105.00
shoulder
18. S.F. Slung Seal 54,000 45,666 8,334 $ .30 $ 2,500.00
21. L.F. 20in VCP 19 0 19 $ 340.00 $ 6,460.00
Gravity Sewer
22. V.F. 604n Manhole 12 0 12 $ 500.00 $ 6,000.00
25. L.S Temp.Sewage 100% 60% 40% $10,000.00 $ 4,000.00
by-pass
26. L.S. Refurb.Concrete 100% 0% 100% $ 6,200.00 $ 6,200.00
Junct.Structure
30. C.Y. Crushed Rock 500 136 364 $ 24.00 $ 8,736.00
24-36 inches
SUBTOTAL: $59,001.00
CREDIT COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $(42,216.00)
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
TOTAL CREDIT COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $(42,216.00)
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days
Page 2 of 3
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Albert W. Davies, Inc. C.O. No.: Three (3)
Date: September25, 1996
Job: Replacement of Westminster Force Main (First Unit) and Westside Pump Station Force
Main, Contract No. 3-36R
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within
the time within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and
all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time for this Change Order, and no
direct or indirect,incidental or consequential costs,expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by
Contractor, except, as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date: June 20, 1995
Original Contract Time: 360 Calendar Days
Original Completion Dale: June 13, 1996
Time Extension this C.O.: 0 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension: 67 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time: 427 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date: August 18, 1996
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable
Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable
Original Contract Price $3,760,000.00
Prev.Authorized Changes $ 105,972.55
This Change(Add)(Deduct) $ (42,216.00)
Amended Contract Price $3,823,756.55
Page 3 of 3
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Albert W. Davies, Inc. C.O. No.: Three (3)
Date: September 25, 1995
Job: Replacement of Westminster Force Main (First Unit) and Westside Pump Station Force
Main, Contract No. 3-36R
Board Authorization Date:September 25, 1996
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA
Ti tted by: Reviewed by:
1
N- e9'—L/—Y6 I
Construction Manager Date Engineering Manager Date
Approy dby: Ad Form:
r 9_-4,
Dir ctor of Engineering Date GenerA Counsel Date
Accepted by:
ALBERT W.DAVIES,InNC.
Contractor Date
County Sanitation Districts
" of Orange County,California
P.O. Box 8127•10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127
Telephone: (714)962-2411
MINUTES OF FINANCE,
ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE
Wednesday, September 11, 1996, 5:30 P.M.
A meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee of the County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, Califomia was held on
August 7, 1996 at 5:30 p.m., at the Districts'Administrative Offices.
ROLL CALL
The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
Committee Directors Present: Staff Present:
George Brown, Chair Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager
John J. Collins, Joint Chair Judith A. Wilson, Assistant General Manager
Jan Debay Ed Hodges, Director of General Services Admin.
James Flora Gary Streed, Director of Finance
John M. Gullixson Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications
Wally Linn Mike White, Controller
Thomas Saltarelli Marc Dubois, Purchasing Manager
Roger R. Stanton, Vice Chair Christopher Dahl, Information Technology Manager
William G. Steiner Frankie Woodside, Assistant Committee Secretary
Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair
Others Present:
Committee Directors Absent : Russ Patton, Labor Consultant
John C. Cox, Jr. (PJC) Dan Cassidy, Labor Consultant
Burnie Dunlap Thomas Woodruff, General Counsel
Other Directors Present:
None
APPOINTMENT OF A CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No comments were made.
Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee '
Page 2
September 11, 1996 -
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the draft minutes of the August 7, 1996
meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee.
REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
The Chair had no report.
REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
The General Manager asked that the Directors continue to familiarize themselves with the
Strategic Plan by attending the Strategic Plan Workshop on Saturday, September 21.
REPORT OF ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER -ADMINISTRATION
The Assistant General Manager of Administration had no report. New employees Christopher
Dahl, Information Technology Manager and Marc Dubois, Purchasing/Contract Manager were
introduced.
REPORT OF ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER - OPERATIONS
The Assistant General Manager of Operations was not in attendance.
REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
Gary Streed reported on the Districts' daily COP rates. Since the agenda package was mailed,
the COP rates have gone down. Rates traditionally go up at the end of the month and down
after the beginning of the month.
An internal survey of the Finance department was recently completed. Gary Streed will report
the results at next month's meeting.
REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES
The Director of Human Resources was not in attendance.
REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
The Director of General Services had no report.
Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee
Page 3
September 11, 1996
REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNICATIONS
The Director of Communications deferred, as the report would be included in agenda item
FAHR9653.
REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
General Counsel had no report for open session.
DISCUSSION ITEMS (Nos. 1-6)
1. FAHR9649: RECEIVE AND FILE TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF
JULY 1996 (All Districts).
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the
month of July 1996 and forward to the Joint Boards.
2. FAHR96-50: REPORT OF CONTRACTS/PURCHASING MANAGER RE ABC
INVENTORY PROGRAM (All Districts).
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and file-information only.
3. FAHR96-51: ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE DISTRICTS' INVESTMENT POLICY (All
Districts): Consideration of motion to revise the Districts' Investment
Policy Statement, and recommend that the Joint Boards of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 96-_to adopt the updated Investment Policy.
COMMITTEE DISCUSSION: The Director of Finance reviewed the
changes proposed in the staff report which was included in the agenda.
The committee asked to have Callan Associates, our Investment
Management Advisor, report on the pros and cons of allowing investments
to extend beyond 5 years with their next quarterly report. The staff
proposal was modified to provide that the monthly Treasurer's Report be
distributed at the Committee meeting, in order to meet the 30 day
availability required by the revised Government Code.
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS 1) Receive and file this report; 2)Approve
revisions to the Districts' Investment Policy as recommended in this report,
as proposed by the Committee, and as depicted in the updated Investment
Policy presented in staff report; and 3) Recommend that the Joint Boards
of Directors adopt Resolution No. 96_ at their meeting of September 25,
1996. to approve the Districts' updated Investment Policy; repeal
Resolution Nos. 95-14 and 95-15; and repeal Resolution No. 95-78, and
incorporate its contents into Resolution No. 96- .
Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee '
Page 4
September 11, 1995
4. FAHR96-52: ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 132 PROVIDING ADDITIONAL SERVICE
CREDIT FOR RETIREMENT PURPOSES (All Districts): The Director of
Human Resources, in conjunction with the FAHR Committee,
recommends that the Directors adopt the Ordinance providing for two
additional years of service credit to eligible Districts' employees who retire
between January 1 and March 31, 1997, in accordance with the provisions
of Government Code Section 31641.04.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:Adopt Ordinance No. 132, an Ordinance of
the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange
County, California, providing eligible Districts' employees to receive two
years additional service credit for retirement purposes.
5. FAHR96-53: RESULTS OF COMMUNICATIONS MINI AUDIT(All Districts): Staff
Summary Report on the results of the July Communications Mini Audit and
an update of the new and/or expanded programs to reach both internal
and extemal audiences.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and file- information only.
6. FAHR96-54: PROPOSITION 218, RIGHT TO VOTE ON TAXES ACT (All Districts):
The Chief Administrative Officer requests that the Boards go on record in
opposition to Proposition 218 which would impose significant and
expensive procedural requirements on the noticing of proposed
extensions of, or increases to, user fees. The proposition also provides
for the application of the voter initiative to user fees, which means that a
voter initiative could force a roll-back or reduction in user fees which would
have an adverse affect on the Districts' ability to borrow at low interest
rates.
COMMITTEE DISCUSSION: There was considerable committee
discussion about the value and appropriateness of taking a public position
on a ballot measure. The consensus was that we should participate in
information gathering and disseminating sessions but not take an official
position in opposition.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the Districts not go on record opposing
Proposition 218, but investigate methods to inform the public.
CLOSED SESSION
The Committee convened in closed session at 7,05 o.m., as authorized by Government Code
Sections 54957.6, to discuss and consider the item specked under Closed Session as (a)(1) on
the published Agenda. Confidential Minutes of the closed session held by the Committee have
been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are
maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and
Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee
Page 5
September 11, 1996
Committee Closed Meetings. No reportable action was taken re Agenda Item (a)(1).
At 7:45 P.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session.
OTHER BUSINESS. COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY
There were none.
MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT
MEETING
There were none.
MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR
ACTION AND STAFF REPORT
There were none.
FUTURE MEETING DATES
The next Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting is scheduled for
Wednesday, October 9, 1996.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 7:50 o.m.
Submitted by:
k
rapkie Woodside
Finance, Administration and Human
Resources Assistant Committee Secretary
Ic
A.WFAHR9.96
AGENDA
'^ ITEM
� TRANSMITTAL
sr
MEETING DATE ` DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION (InOials of Odginalm)
OMITS: 5-•.
PDC:
FAHR:9-11-96 ALL 2210,Gary Streed,ext 2500
EXEC:
STEER: DMslen No.,Name,and Extension
JT.egs:9-25-96
AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): j
Agenda Wording:
RECEIVE AND FILE TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF JULY 1996 (All Districts)
Recommended Action(s):
1. Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of July 1996.
CEQA REVIEW: Project is Exempt: NOT APPLICABLE DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC REM:
Data Notice of Exemption Red:
Negadn DeeleratIon Approved eo
Fidel EIR Approved an_and Netke of Determin Pion Mad on
BUDGET INFORMATION N1A CURRENTYEAR CURRENT YEAR- YEAR-TO4)ATE REVISED BUDGET
TOTAL BUDGET: S BUDGET AMOUNT TOZATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL
SOURCE: CORF JO DISTRICTS EXPENDITURES (raneurOe WaTnmmnl
sclied le/une Xem: 4,4 ,�/�A h'1,4 y�A
AMOUNT OF TRANSFER:
Schedule/Line Item:
AITIPROJECT COST INFORMATION ORIGINAL BID,PO, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED PROJECT
CONTRACT FUNDS PREV. REQUESTED THIS AMOUNT
AMOUNT APPROVED AR
WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? No
If YES,stale number: Permanent Limited Term REQUIRES
explain in ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section
CONCURRENCES: ATTACHMENTS TO AGENDA(List)
To Committee: 1.Graph-Cash Investments
2.Monthly Monitoring Reports
Signature Date
Divi ' n Manager(zesignee) q �f
L 1t I� To Jt. Bds.: . 1.Graph-Cash Investments
ture Date 2.Monthly Monitoring Reports
epartment Head (Or Designee)
S ture Date
Assistant General Manager(Or Designee)
yailif:,Y
p:
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION(Background and/or Summary)
Both Pacific Investment Management Co., PIMCO,and Mellon Trust began their professional external management of
our funds in September 1995.
In order to give the Directors an opportunilyto review the month-end reports available from PIMCO,and to avoid
distribution at the meeting, reports from the prior month are included with the agenda. Immediate past-month reports
are available from the Treasurer. Quarterly presentations are made by PIMCO and our third-party independent
consultant, Callan Associates,when requested by the Committee.
The Investment Policy adopted by the Joint Boards on May 24, 1995, includes reporting requirements as listed down the
left most column of the PIMCO Monthly Report for the-Liquid Operating Monies"and for the'Long-Term Operating
Monies.' All of the Investment Policy requirements are being complied with and performance to date exceeds the index
rates.
Historical cost and the current market values, "mark-to-market," are shown as estimated by both PIMCO and Mellon
Trust. The slight differences are caused by differing assumptions regarding marketability at the estimate date.
Attached are schedules showing the detail and summary for both the short-term and long-term portfolio investments.
Balances-
CSDOC July 31,1996.!.
State of Calif.LAIF $ 3,229,090
Bank of America 471,512
PIMCO-Short-term Portfolio 52,388,846
PIMCO-Long-term Portfolio 281,541,877
District 11 GO Bond Fund 9,792
Debt Service Reserves @ Trustees 33.514.921
$ 137 ,156.03g
GGS:Ic
c: Department Head
AGM-Administration
AGM-Operations
General Manager
J:\WPDOC\FIN\CRANEtFPC.MTGIFAHR.961 EPT.AIT\TREAS.RPT Page 2 of 2
Revision: VIM
September 11, 1996
CSDOC
TOTAL CASH & INVESTMENTS 1995 - 1996
400
350
300
• zso
0
0
`0 200
00
0
150
i
100
50
0
July 31Aug.31 Sept.300ot 30Nov.30 Dec.31Jan.31 Feb'29Mar.31 Apr.30 May 31Juns 30July 31
l\W V W(�FINIC RANPfPC.MiGV.V 1R.6R5FSl./TTRFAS GRF
MONTHLY REPORT
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING
(for the month ending July 31, 1996)
Long Term Operating Monies
14.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate:
PIMCO $282,812,940
Mellon $283,303,766
Historical Cost: $287,463,392
14.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 2.5
Of Index: 2.3
14.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss) of I%Change: $7,070,324
14.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos:
(see attached schedule) 0%
14.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: NA
14.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: AAA
14.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0"/"
14.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance"
14.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Portfolio Total Rate of Return:
1 Month: .37
3 Months: 1.31
12 Months: ----
Year-to-Date: .74
Index Total Rate of Return: .36
1 Month:
C OFFICflWPW IMWIWCSWUICORIN.TIIILWPp
MONTHLY REPORT
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING
((or the month ending July 31, 1996)
Liquid Operating Monies
14.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate:
PIMCO $52,863,199
• Mellon $52,855,090
Historical Cost: $52,959,993
14.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: .07
Of Index: .25
14.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gairuloss)of 1%Change: $37,004 (.07%)
14.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos:
(see attached schedule) 0%
14.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 99%
14.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: AAA
14.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0%
14.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance"
14.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Portfolio Total Rate of Return:
1 Month: .48
3 Months: 1.38
12 Months:
Year-to-Date: 3.17
Index Total Rate of Return:
1 Month: .43
C':'UFFICEIWPWIMWP/NN.'NIA1C'OWIV.(jfLN.WP
MSP075111 MELLON TRUST '
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO PORTFOLIO SOMMARY BY SECTOR BASE: USD
31-UUL-1996 NB1300
t OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CURE
PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOBS ANNUAL INCO4E YIEW
------------------------------ ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- -------
CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS
CASH 0.17 0.17 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00
C@ CIAL PAPER - DISCOUNT 15,302,049.36 15,302,049.36 28.95% 0.00 0.00 0.00
FEDERAL, HOME WAN MOR]OAGB -LE 2,369,582.75 2,369,562.75 4.48% 0.00 0.00 0.00
FNMA ISSUES - LESS THU 1YR 10,548,720.10 10,546,720.10 19.96% 0.00 0.00 0.00
FED W WAN BW - LEM THIS IYR 9,066,105.20 9,066,185.20 17.15% 0.00 0.00 0.00
FEDERAL FARH CREDIT BANK - LES 5,476.560.97 5,476,560.97 10.36% 0.00 0.00 0.00
MDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNTS 151,719.00 151,719.00 0.29t 0.00 5,689.46 3.75
CANADIAN GOVERNMENT SHORT TERN 4,969,578.25 4,869,578.25 9.21t 0.00 0.00 0.00
------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- -------
TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 47,784,395.00 47,764,395.80 90.41% 0.00 5,689.46 0.01
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
BANKING 6 FINANCE 2,050,400.00 2,000,000.00 3.79% -50,400.00 180,000.00 9.00
INDUSTRIAL 2,554,050.00 2.500,000.00 4.73% -54,050.00 213,750.00 6.55
------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- -------
TOTAL FIXED INCME SECURITIES 4,604.450.00 4,500,000.00 9.51% -104,450.00 393,750.00 9.75
OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS
PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 570.694.54 S70,694.54 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- -------
TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 570,694.54 570,694.54 2.08% 0.00 0.00 0.00
..vvv vO9v) s NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 52,959,540.34 52,855,090.34 100.00% Deaea�-104 450.00 aQOeO-399, eOe 439.46 0.76
MSF07SIll MI ON TRUST
LIQUID OPER-PINCO PORTFOLIO DETAIL BY SECTOR BASE: USD
31-.KB.-1996 I031100
MARKET t OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CURS
SNARES/PAR SECURITY DESCRIPTION PRICE MARRST VALUE TOTAL COST GAIN/Loss ANNUAL INCOME YLO
--------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS
CASH
D CASH 1.000 0.17 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.00 D.00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL CASH 0.17 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00
�CIAL PAPER - DISCOUNT
500,000 AMERICAN TEL 6 TL DISC 98.775 493,875.00 0.93 493,875.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
05/16/1996
1,000,000 AMERICAN TEL 6 TL DISC 98.469 1,772,437.50 3.35 1,702,437.50 0.00 0.00 0.00
O8/09/1996
1,100,000 CANADIAN WHEAT BD DISC 90.633 1,084,967.59 2.05 1,084,967.59 0.00 O.DO 0.00
08/09/1996
2,IOO,ODO COMWLTH BK AUST A DISC 98.653 2,071,717.67 3.92 2,071,717.67 0.00 O.DO 0.00
08/20/1996
300,000 ELECTRIC FRANCS DISC 96.660 296,003.58 0.56 296,003.58 0.00 0.00 U.OD
O8/23/1996
1,700,000 FORD M CR CO DISC 98.580 1,675,960.48 3.17 1,675,960.48 0.00 0.00 0.00
08/29/1996
500,000 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 99.567 497,637.06 0.94 497,937.06 0.00 0.00 DAD
08/01/1996
1,100,000 NEWLITT PACKARD DISC 98.673 1,085,402.08 2.05 1,085,402.08 0.00 0.00 0.00
O8/20/1996
600,000 Km INTL FIN INC DISC 98.601 591,609.34 1.12 591.608.34 0.00 0.00 0.00
08/06/1596
1,100,000 KFW INTL FIN INC DISC 99.123 1,090,355.14 2.06 1,090,355.14 0.00 0.00 0.00
09/19/1996
1,700,000 LILLY ELI 6 CO DISC 96.670 1,677,389.06 3.17 1.677,389.06 0.00 0.00 0.00
10/21/1996
500,000 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 99.544 497,718.06 0.94 497,718.06 0.00 0.00 D.00
08/23/1996
2,500,000 ONTARIO HYDRO DISC 96.675 2,466,877.78 4.67 2,466,877.70 0.00 0.00 0.00
09/09/1996
---------------------------------------" -------------------
SUBTOTAL co 9 cIAL PAPER - DISCOUNT 15,302,049.36 26.95 15,302,049.36 0.00 0.00 0.00
FEDERAL NOW LOAN NORTOAOE -LESS THAN 1 YR
2,100,000 FEDERAL HOME LN MIG C1aRP DISC 96.644 2,071,519.75 3.92 2,071,518.75 0.00 0.00 0.00
MAT 09/05/1996
300,000 FEDERAL ROM LN NTG CORP DISC 99.355 298,064.00 0.56 298,064.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MAT 09/12/1996
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL FEDERAL HOME WAN MORTGAGE 2,369,SS2.75 4.48 2,369,SS2.75 0.00 0.00 D.00
FT04A ISSUES - LESS TM In
700,000 FED HOME LN NTG CORP DISC SYS 99.310 695,270.10 1.32 695,17O.10 0.00 0.00 0.00
08/12/1996
OCSFOT5111 MELWN TRUST
LIQUID OPSR-PIMCO PORTFOLIO DETAIL BY SECTOR WE: USD
31-J -1996 TD11300
MARKET k OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CURR
SHARES/PAR SECURITY DESCRIPTION PRICE MARKET VAIDE TOTAL COST GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YLD
_______________ --------__________________________ _____- ________---___---____------___-____----______---
10,000,000 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DISC 96.536 9,853,550.00 18.64 9,853,550.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
08/23/1996
_____________________________________________________________________________
SUBTOTAL FTMA ISSUES - LESS THN 1YR 10,548,720.10 19.96 10,548,720.10 0.00 0.00 0.00
FED HM LOAN BNK - LESS INS IYR
3,100,OOD FEDERAL MCME IN BK CONS DISC 98.435 3,051,473.81 5.77 3,051,473.81 0.00 0.00 0.00
MAT 08/12/1996
3,100,ODO FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 98.698 3,059,622.50 5.79 3,059,622.50 0.00 0.00 0.00
MAT O8/14/1996
500,000 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 97.662 488,311.11 0.92 488,311.11 0.00 0.00 0.00
MATURES 11/12/1996
2,500,000 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 98.671 2,466,077.78 4.67 2,466,I77.78 0.00 0.00 0.00
MAT 08/28/1996
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL FED FM LOAN BNK - LESS THN 9,066,185.20 17.15 9,066,105.20 O.OD O.OD 0.00
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK - LESS THAN 1 YEAR
2,500,000 FED FARM CA BK CONS DISC NIS 99.550 2,488,740.97 4.71 2,488,740.97 0.00 0.00 0.00
MAT 08/15/1996
3,000,000 FED FARM CA BK CONS DISC NTS 99.594 2,987,820.00 5.65 2,987,920.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MAT O8/21/1996
_____________________________________________________________________________
SUBTOTAL FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK - 5,476,560.97 10.36 5,476,560.97 0,00 0.00 0.00
BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNTS
151.119 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOVNI- 100.000 151,719.00 0.29 151,719.00 0.00 5,669.46 3.75
PUBLIC II
____-_ ----------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUN 151,719.00 0.29 151,719.00 0.00 5,689.46 3.75
CANADIAN GOVERNMENT SHORT TERM
1,2DO,000 CANADA GOUT DISC 99.511 1,194,137.00 2.26 1,194,137.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
DB/12/1996
3,700,OOD CANADA GOVT DISC 99.336 3,675,441.25 6.95 3,675,441.25 0.00 0.00 0.00
O8/15/1996
________________________________________________________________
SUBTOTAL CANADIAN GOVERNMENT SHORT I 4,869,579.25 9.21 4,969,ST8.25 D.00 0.00 0.00
_____________________________________________________________________________
TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 40,784,395.90 90.41 47,784,395.80 0.00 5,689.46 0.01
IIXED INCOME SECURITIES
BANKING 6 FINANCE
2,000,000 SEARS DC CORP MIN SEE II 100.000 2,000,000.00 3.78 2,050,400.00 -50,400.00 180,000.00 9.00
9.000% DB/01/1996 DD 08/01/91
_____________________________________________________________________________
OCSF075111 MELLON TRUST
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO PORTFOLIO DETAIL BY SECTOR BASE: USD
31-JUL-1996 RB1100
MARKET t OP UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CURE
SNARES/PAR SECURITY DESCRIPTION PRICE MARKET VALUE TOTAL COST GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YLD
--------------- ----------------------------------------------------•-------------------_------__-----------------------------------
SUBTOTAL RANKING A FINANCE 2,000,000.00 3.78 2,050,400.00 -50.400.00 180,000.00 9.00
INDUSTRIAL
2,500,000 SEARS ROEBUCK A CO NT 200.000 2,500,000.00 4.73 2,554,050.00 -54,050.00 213,750.00 8.55
B.SSOk O8/01/1996
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL INDUSTRIAL 2,500,000.00 4.73 2,554,050.00 -54,050.00 213.750.00 8.55
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
TUTAL FIXED INCCPIE SECURITIES 4,500,000.00 8.51 4.604,450.00 -104,450.00 393.750.00 8.75
OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS
PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES
0 INTEREST RECEIVABLE 1.000 570,694.54 1.09 570,694.54 0.00 0.00 0.00
. -------------•---------------------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 570,694.54 1.08 570,694.54 0.00 0.00 0.00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 570,694.54 1.08 570,694.54 0.00 0.00 0.00
.............................................................................
NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 52,855,090.34 100.00 52,959,540.34 -104,450.00 399,439.46 0.76
P.. I �L
X73 FO752]] M6LION TRUST
'.ONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PORTFOLIO SUMMARY BY SECTOR BABE: DID '
31.OUL-1996 HB1300
t OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CURB
PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALOR TOTAL GAIN/Loss ANNUAL INCOME YIELD
.................. .................. ........ ................. ................ .......
:ASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS
CASH 0.65 0.65 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00
COA4ERCIAL PAPER - DISCOUNT 11,273,902.20 11,273,902.20 3.90 0.00 0.00 0.00
TREASURY BILLS - LESS THN 1YR 4,719,669.45 4,719,669.45 1.67% 0.00 0.00 0.00
MDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNTS 171,302.00 171,302.00 0.06% 0.00 6,423.83 3.75
CANADIAN GOVERNMENT SHORT TERM 497,644.44 497,644.44 0.181 0.00 0.00 0.00
__________________ __________________ ________ _____________ _ ________________ _______
TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 16,562,518.D4 16,562,518.74 5.85% 0.00 6,423.63 0.04
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
U.S. GOVERNMENTS 91,326,196.55 89,590,765.00 31.62% -1,735,431.65 6,126,875.00 6.84
V.S. AGENCIES 334,518,625.00 132,475,374.00 46.70 .2,043.251.00 0,700,040.00 6.57
BANKING 6 FINANCE 27,627,436.61 27,548,327.45 9.72t -79,209.16 1,905,397.00 6.92
INDUSTRIAL 11,507,100.00 11,172,210.00 3.90 -334,090.00 908,500.00 8.85
__________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ _______
TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 264,979,358.46 260,786,676.45 92.05% -4,192,682.01 17,720,612.00 6.30
MTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS
PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 5,954,570.92 5,954,570.92 2.20% 0.00 0.00 0.00
.................. .................. ........ ................. ................ .......
TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 5,954,570.92 5,954,570.92 2.IOt 0.00 0.00 0.00
vvv1 s NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 287,496,446.13 283,303,766.12 100.00% vsOO •••-4,192,6B2.01 17,727,235.83 6.2E
UCSF075222 MELLON TRUST
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PORTFOLIO DETAIL BY SECTOR BASE: USD
31-JUL-1996 HB1300
MARKET t OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CURR
SNARES/PAR SECURITY DESCRIPTION PRICE MARKET VALUE TOTAL COST GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YLD
--------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-ASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS
CASH
0 CASH 1.000 0.65 0.00 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL CASH 0.65 0.00 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.00
COBAtERCIAL PAPER - DISCOUNT
5,800,OOD WERICAN TEL R TL DISC 98.656 5,722,035.11 2.02 5,722,035.11 0.00 0.00 0.00
OB/22/1996
900,000 AMERITECH CORP DISC 99.660 987,940.50 0.31 887,940.50 0.00 0.00 0.00
10/28/1996
3,1OD,000 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 99.567 3,086,589.92 1.09 3,086,589.92 0.00 0.00 0.00
08/01/1996
1,300,000 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 96.336 1,278,373.06 0.45 1,208,373.06 O.OD 0.00 0.00
08/06/1996
200,000 PROCTER 6 GAMBLE DISC 99.482 198,963.61 0.07 198,963.61 0.00 0.00 0.00
08/05/1996
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUEYOTAL CCKM ERCIAL PAPER - DISCOUNT 11,173,902.20 3.94 11,173,902.20 0.00 0.00 0.00
TREASURY BILLS - LESS THN 1YR
5,000,000 U S TREASURY BILLS 94.393 4,719,669.45 1.67 4,719,669.45 0.00 0.00 0.00
06/26/1997 DO 06/27/96
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL TREASURY BILLS - LESS THN 1 4,719,669.45 1.67 4,719,669.45 0.00 0.00 0.00
BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNTS
171,302 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 100.000 171,302.00 0.06 171,302.00 0.00 6,423.83 3.75
PUBLIC II
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL MDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUN 171,302.00 0.06 171,302.00 0.00 6,423.83 3.75
CANADIAN GOVeRM4EM SHORT TERM
500,000 CANADIAN WHEAT BD DISC 99.529 497,644.44 0.18 497,644.44 0.00 0.00 0.00
08/20/1996
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL CANADIMI GOVERNMENT SHORT T 497,644.44 0.18 497,644.44 0.00 0.00 O.DO
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 16,562,51B.74 5.85 16,562,518.74 0.00 6,423.83 0.04
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
U.S. GOVERNMENTS
75,500,000 U 5 TREASURY NOTES 101.937 76,962,435.00 27.17 78,223,610.72 -1,261,183.72 5,379,375.00 6.99
07.125% 09/30/1999 DO 09/30/94
13,000,000 U S TREASURY NOTES 97.141 12,628,330.00 4.46 13,102,570.13 -474,248.13 747,500.00 5.92
Page 1
OCSF075222 MELLON TRUST
WNG TERM OPER-PIMCO PORTFOLIO DETAIL BY SECTOR BASE: USD '
31-JUL-1996 11100
MARKET t OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CORR
SHARES/PAR SECURITY DESCRIPTION PRICE MARKET VALVE TOTAL COST GAIN/WSS ANNUAL INCOME YLD
---""--------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OS.750t 10/31/2000 DO 10/31/95
............__.....____-------------__-------------___............__....
SUBTOTAL U.S. GOVERNMENTS 89,590,765.00 31.62 91,326,196.85 -1,735,431.85 6,126,875.00 6.84
U.S. AGENCIES
10.000,000 FED NAIL MTG ASSN MTN 95.484 9,548,400.00 3.37 9,593,750.00 -45,350.00 564,000.00 5.91
5.640% 02/20/2001 DO 02/20/96
39,600,000 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS SOS 98.594 39,043,224.00 13.79 39,990,500.00 -847,276.00 2,570,040.00 6.58
6.490% 09/13/2000 DO 09/13/95
15,000,000 FEDERAL HCME W MTG CORP DEES 96.734 14,510,100.00 5.22 14,554,667.50 -44,587.50 898,500.00 6.19
5.990t 03/06/2001 DO 03/06/96
25,000,000 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG DEB 99.165 24,796,250.00 9.75 25,000,000.00 -203,750.00 1,680,000.00 6.76
6.720% 10/02/2000 DD 10/02/95
25.000,000 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DEB 99.672 24,919,000.00 8.90 25,351,562.50 -433,562.50 1,712,500.00 6.87
6.8507 05/26/2000 DO 05/26/95
20,000,ODO FEDERAL WAL MIG ASSN 98.297 19,659,400.00 6.94 20,128,125.00 -465,725.00 1,275,000.00 6.49
6.37St 10/13/2000 DO 10/10/95
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL V.S. AGENCIES 132,475,374.00 46.76 134,518,625.00 -2,043,251.00 8.700,040.00 6.57
BANKING 6 PINANCB
1,500,000 CHRYSLER FINL MTV TR K 00201 100.901 1,513,515.00 0.53 1,534,950.00 -21,435.00 122,400.00 8.09
8.160% 01/31/1997 DO 01/11/95
465,000 CHRYSLER FINL MTV TR R 00224 100.953 469,431.45 0.17 475,972.61 -6,541.16 37,572.00 8.00
8.080% 01/31/1997 DO 01/31/95
1,SOO,000 CHRYSLER FINL MTN TR 8 00258 100.772 2,511,580.00 0.53 1,522,240.00 -10,560.00 110,700.00 7.32
7.380% 03/17/1997 DD 03/03/95
2,900,000 CHRYSLER FINL MTN TR R 00306 101.305 2,937.845.00 1.04 2,952,896.00 -15,051.00 210,830.00 7.18
7.270% 04/13/1998 DO 04/13/95
1,000,000 CHRYSLER FINL MTN TR R 00335 99.451 994,510.00 0.35 993,160.00 1,350.00 62.600.00 6.29
6.260t 07/20/1996 DD 07/18/95
7,100,000 FORD MOTOR CR MIN TR 4 00177 100.062 7,104,402.00 2.51 6,999,748.00 104,654.00 402,570.00 5.67
VAR/RT 03/30/1999 00 03/30/94
4,000,000 FORD MW CA WN TRANCHE RTR 96 99.647 3,993,800.00 1.41 3,970,480.00 23,400.00 243,200.00 6.09
MW/RT 11/09/1998 DD 11/08/93
3,000,000 G M A C MED TERM NTS 205.290 3,158,700.00 1.11 3,227,070.00 -68,370.00 258,750,00 8.19
8.625% 1/10/2000 DO 1/10/95
3,700,000 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP MTN TR00324 103.792 3,840,304.00 1.36 3,911,640.00 -71,336.00 309,875.00 8.07
8.375% 02/03/1999 DO 0/03/95
1,000,000 LEHMAN BROS INC SR SUB NIS 100.474 1,004,740.00 0.35 1,007,520.00 -2,780.00 70,000.00 6.97
7.000t 5/15/1997 DD 5/27/94
1,000,000 SEARS ROEBUCK MTN 9 TR 00491 101.942 1,019,420.00 0.36 1,031,860.00 -12,440.00 76,900.00 7.54
7.690% 02/27/1998 DO 02/28/9S
........................... -------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL BANKING B FINANCE 27,548,327.45 9.72 27,627,436.61 -79,109.16 1,905,397.00 6.92
INDUSTRIAL
1,500,000 CHRYSLER CORP DEB 103.828 1,557,420.00 0.55 1,603,320.00 -45,900.00 156,000.00 10.02
Page 2
OCSF075222 MELLON TRUST
LOW TERM OPER-PIHCO PORTFOLIO DETAIL BY SECTOR BASE: ORD
31-UUI.-1996 IDf1100
MARKET i OF UNREALIZED SSTIMATSD CURB
SNARES/PAR SECURITY DESCRIPTION PRICE MARKET VAGUE TOTAL COST GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YLD
_______________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
10.400% 08/01/1999
9,000,000 PHILIP MORRIS COS NT 106.831 9,614,790.00 3.39 9,903,700.00 -288,990.00 832,500.00 6.66
9.250% 02/15/2000
_____________________________________________________________________________
SUBTOTAL INDUSTRIAL 11,172,210.00 3.94 11,507,100.00 -334,890.00 968,500.00 6.65
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 260,786,676.45 92.05 264,979,358.46 -4,192,682.01 17,720,012.00 6.80
TTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS
PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES
D INTEREST RECEIVABLE 1.000 5,954,570.92 2.10 5,954,570.92 0.00 0.00 0.00
___________________________________ __---_-__---_-________-__-____
SUBTOTAL PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 5,954,570.92 2.10 5,954,570.92 0.00 0.00 0.00
_____________________________________________________________________________
TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 5,954,570.92 2.10 5,954,570.92 0.00 0.00 0.00
NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 283, ' �303 766.21 100.00 287,496,448.12 -4,192,682.01..............................
0v 17,727,235.836n26
Page 3
a _
1 S
AGEN
n"oNmE ITEMDA
a ooN �, TRANSMITTAL
- >90.43715CUSS1tlN
's
MEETING DATE DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION (Inelals of Odglnator)
OMITS:
PDC: Bw
FAHR:9M 1/96All 2210,Steve Kozak eXt.25D4
EXEC:
STEER: Dldsion No.,Name,and Edenslon
JT.BDs:925/98
AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
Agenda Wording:
ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE DISTRICTS' INVESTMENT POLICY(All Districts): Consideration of motion to revise the
Districts'Investment Policy Statement,and recommend that the Joint Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No.96-nc to
adopt the updated Investment Policy.
Recommended Action(s):
1. Receive and file this report.
2. Approve revisions to the Districts'Investment Policy as recommended in this report,as proposed by the Committee
and as depicted in the updated Investment Policy presented in staff report.
3. Recommend that the Joint Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No.96-_at their meeting of September 25, 1996,
to approve the Districts'updated Investment Policy; repeal Resolution Nos. 95-14 and 95-15;and repeal Resolution
No.95-78,and incorporate its contents Into Resolution No.96-_.
CEOA REVIEW: Projed Is Exempt: NOTAPPLICABLE DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC REM:
Date Notice of Exemption Filed:
Negative Declaration Approved on
Final EIR Approved on_and Notice of Detemnlnallon filed on_ May 24, 1995
BUDGET INFORMATION CURRENTYEAR CURRENT YEAR- YEAR-TO4DATE REVISED BUDGET
TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.: $ BUDGETAMOUNT TO-0ATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL
SOURCE: CORF JO DISTRICTS EXPENDITURES R�ieuepnq..Tnedmel
Scheddef.m Item: NA NA NA NA
AMOUNT OF TRANSFER:
SchedukiLlne Item:
AITIPROJECT COST INFORMATION ORIGINAL BID,PO, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED PROJECT
CONTRACT FUNDS PREV. REQUESTED THIS AMOUNT
AMOUNT APPROVED AIT
NA NA NA NA
WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? YES
If YES,sWlenumbec Permanent nnim Term If YES,e lam in ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section
CONCURRENCES: ATTACHMENTS TO AGENDA(List)
17 5EPT96 To Committee: Staff Report
2.. Resolution
No. 96-nc
-dignatu Date
DM on Me Design e)
To Jt. Bds.: 1. Staff Report
qg—naturej Date
Department Head(Or Designee) 2. Resolution Na.96-nr
Signatur
t en Date
Assistaneral Manager(Or Designee)
OATS COMM. PDC COMM. FAHR COMM. JOINT BOARDS
Meeting Dater
Approved.
Amended:
Fcnvardedto*
ADDmONAL INFORMATION(Background and/or Summary)
First Annual review of the Districts' Investment Policy, and recommendation to the Joint Boards for adoption of a
Resolution for approval of Districts' updated Investment Policy.
svk
c: Department Head
AGM-Administration
AGM-Operations
General Manager
General Counsel
J:1W PD0CIFINICRANEIFPC.MTGVAHR.961SEPT.AITIFAHR96S1
Page 2 of 2
Revision'. 64M
n
September 11, 1996 p.--.--
Revised 9-12-95
STAFF REPORT
Annual Review of the Districts' Investment Policy
Summary
The Districts' current Investment Policy was reviewed and approved by the Finance,
Administration & Human Resources Committee (FAHR) on May 10, 1995, and adopted by the
Joint Boards on May 24, 1995. On September 7, 1995, final professional services agreements
were signed, the Districts' Treasury Bill investments matured and funds were wired to Mellon
Trust for investment by PIMCO, the Districts' external Money Manager. The Districts'
Investment Policy governs PIMCO's investment activities on behalf of the Districts.
The Investment Policy, attached, includes the requirement that the Districts shall review its
Investment Policy annually(Sections 1.2 and 16.1). This staff report presents the first Annual
Review of the Districts' Investment Policy to the Committee for Consideration in your capacity as
the oversight committee for the Investment Policy(Section 16.2). This review includes:
1. Revisions to the Investment Policy as required by the Government Accounting
Standards Board (GASB), and amendments to the California Government Code;
2. Revisions to the Investment Policy as recommended by the Municipal Treasurers'
Association of the United States & Canada (MTA);
3. Revisions to the Investment Policy as requested by PIMCO, the Districts' External
Investment Advisor; and
4. Recommendations regarding the resolution of several administrative matters.
Revisions Required by GASB and the Government Code
The following discussion highlights the changes in investment practices that are required of
local agencies as a result of the recent revisions in investment laws made by GASB and the
California Government Code. Because the Districts' original 1995 Investment Policy was written
to be both conservative and prudent in nature, 4 anticipated some of the changes that are now
required of all local governments in California. As such, the Districts' Investment Policy is
largely in compliance with the new investment laws and only a few amendments are necessary.
The table in Attachment "1," summarizes the new reporting requirements; provides status
information on the Districts' implementation of the new requirements; and recommends
revisions to the Investment Policy, where appropriate. A copy of the Districts' updated
Investment Policy is also presented in Attachment"2," and denotes the recommended revisions
for adoption (see redlined text).
CS DOC • P.O.Box 8 12 7 • Foontai n Val lay,CA 92728-8127 0 (714)962-2411
9
FAHR 96-51
Page 2
September 11, 1996
GASB/Government Code Changes Requiring No Change to Investment Policy
Earlier this year, the Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB), which sets
governmental accounting standards, followed the lead of the Financial Accounting Standards
Board (FASB), which sets business accounting standards, in announcing its decision that state
and local governments should report their investments at"fair," or market values. Section
15.1.1 of the Districts' Investment Policy currently requires that the value of the Districts'
portfolio be marked-to-market each month. Therefore, no change is required.
The California Government Code was recently amended to include the provisions of Senate
Bills 564 and 866, which pertain to local agency investments (excluding bond proceeds). The
proceeds of the Districts' capital projects financing program are invested in accordance with the
provisions of their specific bond covenants and indentures, as noted in Section 2.0 of the
Districts' Investment Policy.
First, all local government entities must adopt formal investment policies and must annually
review and re-adopt policies at a public meeting. The Districts' original 1995 Investment Policy
included this requirement.
The new laws establish that local agency investment policy objectives must, in priority order, be
safety, liquidity, and then yield; and that local agency investment officials are considered
trustees and fiduciaries subject to defined prudent investment standards. The Districts' original
1995 Investment Policy included these requirements, as well as a section on Ethics and
Conflicts of Interest which applies to the Districts' officers and employees involved in the
investment process.
The governing bodies of local governments must now receive investment reports at least
quarterly, and may require them monthly. The new law specifies what must appear in these
reports, including the type of investment, issue maturity, market value of the portfolio, and the
source of the valuation. The Districts' original 1995 Investment Policy included these
requirements.
The new laws limit investment in reverse repurchase agreements ("reverse repos")to 20% of a
local agency's portfolio, and contain outright prohibitions on inverse floaters, range notes, and
interest-only strips. The Districts' original 1995 Investment Policy included the limitation, in
Section 8.13.1, that no more than 20% of the Districts' portfolio shall be invested in reverse
repurchase agreements. Inverse floaters, range notes, and interest-only strips are not permitted
investments under the Districts' Investment Policy.
It should be noted that, with regard to reverse repos, the Districts' original 1995 Investment
Policy limits their maximum maturity to 90 days, unless otherwise specifically authorized by the
Districts' Board of Directors; and further stipulates that the reverse repos shall mature on the
exact date of a known cash flow which will be unconditionally available to repay the maturing
reverse repo ("matched"); and finally that reverse repo proceeds shall be used solely to
supplement liquidity, and shall not be used to speculate on market movements. Thus, the
Districts' Investment Policy is somewhat more restrictive and conservative than required by
Government Code.
FAHR 96-51
Page 3
September 11, 1996
For protection of local agency funds, the new laws require that all securities must be delivered
via book entry, physical delivery, or via a third party safekeeping custodial agreement. The
Districts' original 1995 Investment Policy included requirements for all securities transactions to
be conducted on a delivery-versus-payment basis (DVP), and that all securities will be held by a
third-party custodian. Mellon Trust provides these services to the Districts.
Government Code Changes Requiring Revisions to the Investment Policv
The new code revisions require that reports must indicate that investments are in compliance
with the adopted policies of the local agency, or identify areas of non-compliance. Although the
Districts' monthly reports currently include this practice under Section 15.1.8 of the 1995
Investment Policy, a clarification is proposed to this section for more precise compliance with
the new laws.
Specifically, the current wording of Section 15.1.8 requires that investment reports include a
listing of any transactions or holdings which do not comply with the Districts' Investment Policy
or with the California Government Code. The clarification would add a phrase to state that all
investments are in compliance with the Districts' Investment Policy and the California
Government Code.
Reports must also state the ability of the local agency to meet the next six (6) months of cash
flow requirements. If the agency is not able to meet its cash flow demands, the report must
state the reasons for the shortfall. New Section 15.1.10 is recommended for addition to the
Districts' Investment Policy to comply with this requirement. The Quarterly Investment Report
for the quarter ended June 30, 1996 contained this statement.
The new Code revisions require that reports be available within 30 days of the end of the period.
The Districts' current reporting cycle involves completion and submittal of monthly and quarterly
investment reports to the Treasurer within 30 days following month or quarter end. Reports
from PIMCO and Mellon are available in the second week of each month. The Treasurer
reviews the reports and forwards them to the FAHR Committee the following month as the mail-
out requirement (first week of each month)for the monthly FAHR Committee meetings arrives
before the reports are available.
If the FAHR Committee is comfortable receiving the reports on the day of their meeting, rather
than in the advanced mailed package, the Joint Boards would be able to review the reports
within the 30-day time frame. An alternate solution, however, that would allow the Committee
full advance review of reports is to note that the reports are on file with the Treasurer and
available upon request for review within the 30-day time frame.
Apa1f'n6ddffirWdffMft addition of theYo0oJring phrase to Section 15.1 of the Investment Polyd�
meet both goals of adequate time for Committee review and full Code compliance "these
orts shall be on file with the Treasurer and available for review within 30 days of the end of
ontbtcptarter .. ..
8M
FAHR 96-51
Page 4
September 11, 1996
Revisions Recommended by the Municipal Treasurers' Association US & Canada
Staff consulted with the Municipal Treasurers' Association of the United States & Canada (MTA)
for comments on the Districts' Investment Policy, in preparation for submittal of the updated
Policy to MTA for consideration under MTA's Certification of Excellence program.
Most of the comments received from the MTA involved increasing the level of elaboration and
detail in various sections of the Districts' Investment Policy.
The MTA also recommended that the Policy contain separate sections covering securities
collateralization and maturity topics. Although the 1995 Investment Policy covered these topics,
staff recommends the addition of Section 9.0, Collaleralization, and Section 12.0, Maximum
Maturities, to the updated Policy.
Finally, the MTA recommended that the Policy should specifically require that all Repurchase
and Reverse Repurchase Agreements be the subject of a Master Repurchase Agreement
between the Districts and the investment provider. Staff recommends the addition of Sections
8.12.2 and 8.13.5, to address this comment.
Amendments to the Investment Policy Requested by PIMCO
Consistent with Section 1.2 of the Investment Policy, which states that the Districts shall review
its Investment Policy annually, and may change its policies as its investment objectives change,
staff reviewed several investment guideline proposals from PIMCO. The following is a brief
discussion of PIMCO's recommendations to revise the Investment Policy.
1. Delete Lona-Term Portfolio 5-Year Maximum Maturity Constraint
PIMCO proposes that they be allowed to operate the Long-Term Operating Fund without a
maximum maturity constraint. This would delete the maturity requirement in Section
12.2.1 of the Investment Policy, which reads:
"The maximum final stated maturity of individual securities in the Long-Term
Operating Monies account portfolio shall be five (5)years from the date of
purchase, unless otherwise authorized by the Districts' Board of Directors."
PIMCO states that the five-year maximum maturity does not allow investments in the
mortgage sector of the bond market, and impairs their ability to utilize yield curve strategy
to maximize earnings.
Staff Response
Staff does not recommend approval of this recommendation. The Investment Policy
currently allows investment in the mortgage sector of the fixed income market through
collateralized mortgage obligations issued by the U.S. Government (Section 8.11). Should
a specific need or opportunity arise, Section 12.2.1 currently provides PIMCO with the
ability to recommend specific securities with maturities greater than five (5)years for Board
approval. The maximum maturity provisions of the Districts' Investment Policy are in
compliance with the requirements of the Government Code.
FAHR 96-51
Page 5
September 11, 1996
2. Allow Direct Investment in Foreign Bonds and Futures
PIMCO states that allowing investments in foreign bonds and futures should add return
without increasing volatility. It should be noted that the Districts' Investment Policy
currently provides thirteen categories of permitted investments. Foreign bonds and futures
are not among the permitted investments. Further, the Government Code does not permit
investment of public funds in foreign bonds.
Staff Response
Staff does not recommend approval of this recommendation, given the absence of specific
investment authority, the continuing uncertainties in the foreign and futures markets, and
the numerous permitted investment opportunities that are currently to PIMCO under the
Districts' Investment Policy.
3. Allow Investments in Securities with Lower Credit Quality
PIMCO states that lower credit quality issues have outperformed those with higher ratings.
While this is a correct statement, it should be noted that this is the case because lower
credit quality issues represent a higher investment risk; and higher risks produce higher
Yields.
Staff Response
Staff does not recommend approval of this recommendation. In that the Districts'
Investment Policy objectives are safety, liquidity, and then yield, as required by the
Government Code, lower credit quality securities would increase the market risk of the
Districts' investment portfolios. The current Investment Policy allows investments to be
rated as low as "A-," except for Collateralized Mortgage Obligations (CMOs), which must
be rated "AAA.".
4. Extend the Duration for the Short-term Liquid Operating Fund Beyond 90 Days
PIMCO states that because the short-term end of the yield curve lends to be steep, an
increase in the average maturity(or duration) of the Short-Tenn portfolio can produce
increased returns without significantly increasing market risk. For example, the current
yield for a 90-day Treasury is 5.25%, while a 180-day Treasury is yielding 5.47%; an
increase in return of 22 basis points, with no change in the type of investment, or reduction
in credit quality.
Staff Response
Staff recommends approval of an extension of the duration from 90 to 180 days. The
Districts' Investment Policy currently allows the maximum final stated maturity of individual
securities in the Short-Term Liquid Operating Fund to be twelve (12) months from the date
of purchase (Section 12.1.1), and the majority of investments selected by PIMCO for the
Short-Tenn portfolio are U.S. Government securities and prime-rated ("A1/P1") commercial
paper with maximum maturities of 180 days.
FAHR 96-51
Page 6
September 11, 1996
As the Committee considers PIMCO's proposed revisions to the Districts' Investment Policy, it is
important to note that in adopting the Districts' 1995 Investment Policy, the Joint Boards of
Directors adopted a statement which is a comprehensive declaration of policy, scope of
investments, and granting of authorizations and requirements for implementation.
Sections 1.0 and 4.0 of the Investment Policy establish a clear understanding for the Joint
Boards, Districts' management, responsible employees, and third parties of the objectives,
policies, and guidelines for the investment of the Districts' idle and surplus funds, consistent
with the safekeeping of public funds, and prudent financial management.
Administrative Matters
A number of housekeeping items related to the Investment Policy require attention. A brief
description of these clean-up items follows.
• Resolution Adootino Updated Investment Policy:
A new Resolution is required for adoption of the Districts' updated Investment Policy by the
Joint Boards on September 25, 1996. Resolution No 96-xx is presented as Appendix"B"
to the attached Investment Policy.
• Attendance of PIMCO at Quarterly Meetinos:
In Section 15.2 of the Districts' original 1995 Investment Policy, PIMCO is reclured to meet
quarterly with the FAHR Committee. Because mandatory meetings may not always be
necessary, to control costs, and to increase the flexibility of the FAHR Committee, staff
recommends that the following sentence be added to Section 15.2: "External investment
advisers may be required to attend said meetings at the discretion of the Chairman of the
Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee."
• Repeal of Resolution Nos. 95-14 and 95-15:
Resolution Nos. 95-14 and 95-15 were adopted by the Joint Boards on February 8, 1995.
These Resolutions approved interim investment policies following the Orange County
bankruptcy, and before the Districts' permanent Investment Policy was developed and
adopted by the Joint Boards on May 24, 1995. While the Boards' adopton of the
permanent Investment Policy effectively superseded the earlier actions, staff recommends
that Resolution Nos. 95-14 and 95.15 be formally repealed so that the potential for
possibly conflicting Resolutions is eliminated. Repeal of these Resolutions can be
incorporated into the Resolution that is required for adoption of the Districts' updated
Investment Policy.
• Consolidation of Benchmark Resolution:
Resolution No. 95-78, adopted by the Joint Boards on July 26, 1995, approved investment
performance benchmarks for the Districts' short-tern and long-term portfolios. To reduce
the number of outstanding Resolutions for the investment program, staff recommends that
Resolution No. 95-78 be repealed, and that its contents be incorporated into the new
Resolution that is required for adoption of the Districts' updated Investment Policy.
FAHR 96-51
Page 7
September 11, 1996
Ongoing Monitoring Program
Staff continues to monitor pending legislative and regulatory proposals in the public finance
area for their potential impact on the Districts' financial programs. For example, Be 1381
proposes additional changes to the California Government Code regarding local agency
investments in money market funds. At the present time, SB 1381 remains in the Senate Local
Government Committee. Staff will continue to keep the Committee informed of the status of this
and other proposals as they may develop.
Staff Recommendations
Staff recommends that the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee adopt a
motion to:
1. Receive and file this report.
2. Approve revisions to the Districts' Investment Policy as recommended in this report, as
proposed by the Committee and as depicted in the updated Investment Policy presented in
Attachment"2"to this report.
3. Recommend that the Joint Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No. 96-_ at their
meeting of September 25, 1996, which would approve the Districts' updated Investment
Policy; repeal Resolution Nos. 95-14 and 95-15; and repeal Resolution No. 95-78, and
incorporate its contents into Resolution No. 96-_
SKllc
J:\W PDOC\FIN\CRANE\FPC.MTGFAHR,96%STAFFRPT.96\SRFAHR96.51
ATTACHMENT "1"
INVESTMENT PROGRAM REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
SEPTEMBER 1996
CODE CHANGES IMPLEMENTATION INVESTMENT POLICY REVISIONS
Annual review of Investment Policy at a public meeting. E dating-Section 1.2 and 16.1 None
Investment policy objectives must be safety,liquidity and Frieling-Section 4.0 None
yield.
Prudent person investment standard. Existing-Section 3.0 None
Quarterly and/or monthly investment reports. Eristing-Monthly reports are required,Section 15.1. None
Eriating-Quarterly reports are currently presented to Add word'quarteW to Section 15.1.
FAHR. Add the following phrase to Section 15.1: 'These
Completed-Reports submitted 30 days following the month reports shall be on file with the Treasurer and available
or quarter. for review within 30 days of the end of the
month/quarter.'
Quarterly and monthly reports shall include market value, Existing-Market values as of the end of each None
and source of valuation. month/quarter are reported by PIMCO and Mellon.
6dsting-Value of funds in LAIF are reported monthly to None
FAHR.
Completed-2nd Quarter 1996 None
Investment Report will include LAIF market value as
reported by LAIR
Reverse repo investments limited to 20%of portfolio. Eristing-Section 8.13 None
Safekeeping of securities. busting-Section 10.0 None
Mellon Trust is Districts'master custodial bank.
Quarterly reports shall state that investments are in Brisling-Section 15.1.18 requires Investment Reports to Add the following phrase to Section 15.1.8: 'State that
compliance with investment policy. include a feting of any transactions or holdings which do not all investments are In compliance with this policy and
comply with this policy or with the California Government the California Government Code,or provide a.. f
Code. 2nd Quarter 1996 Investment Report Included said
statement
Quarterly reports shall state that there are sufficient funds Completetl-2nd Quarter 1996 Investment Report included Add new Section 15.1.10 to read: 'State that sufficient
to meet expenditure requirements for the next as months, said statement funds are available for CSDOC to meet its operating
expenditure requirements for the next six months,or N
not,state the reasons for the shordat'
JiWPOOCTIMCRANEt PCMTG�AHR.96rCOVERS.96VNVESTRE.996
Y�
ATTACHMENT 112"
b
,pan
Q
• bb
b
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY
INVESTMENT
POLICY
Reviewed and Approved
by
Finance, Administration and Human Resources
Committee
on
September 11, 1996
Adopted
by
Boards of Directors
on
September 25, 1996
4�
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section ink Pate
1.0 Policy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
2.0 Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
3.0 Standard of Prudence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
4.0 Investment Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
5.0 Delegation of Authority . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
6.0 Ethics and Conflicts of Interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
7.0 Authorized Financial Dealers and Institutions . . . . . . . . 4
8.0 Authorized and Suitable Investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
10.0 Safekeeping and Custody . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
11.0 Diversification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
?' I ¢N T mans i p
13.0 Internal Controls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
14.0 Performance Objectives and Benchmarks . . . . . . . . . . . 10
15.0 Reporting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
16.0 Investment Policy Adoption and Revision . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Appendix
A. Summary of Investment Authorization
"fib - \"K )it1 � itesttnetSt
�e� . !r
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CA
4
INVESTMENT STATEMENT
1.0 Policy:
N!M
rvj}y�,fien stncfs of O " � [d
tit r safelevt =a eatonabl}�rateQLretuh
ancf�onfamit�t„�td alt afat ,,, ��at �es gouemingthe ht__ rff ptbftr�ittFJ>�1,3;
1.1. This Investment Policy is set forth by CSDOC for the following purposes:
1.1.1. To establish a clear understanding for the Boards of Directors,
CSDOC management, responsible employees and third parties of the
objectives, policies and guidelines for the investment of the CSDOC's idle
and surplus funds.
1.1.2. To offer guidance to investment staff and any external investment
advisors on the investment of CSDOC funds (see Appendix"A°).
1.1.3. To establish a basis for evaluating investment results.
1.2. CSDOC establishes investment policies which meet its current investment
goals. CSDOC shall review this policy annually, and may change its policies
as its investment objectives change.
2.0 Scope:
This Investment Policy applies to all financial assets of CSDOC O4ceptforHthe"lmdi the
', +wflis�tata " exteit �S3�� DflG�.5r,�pitat
Theses „ HOC a tid���5D9 Z e
Rnnuaffinaneia' pooldlnt e x
General Fund
Special Reserve Funds
Debt Service Funds (unles rohibded by boKffl', '
__
Capital Project Funds
Enterprise Funds
Internal Service Fundd
Trust and Agency Fu
Any new Fund Vista Na EeGtOC a t8g1 ,
Board
Page 1 of 12
3.0 Standard of Prudence: ,
r
3.1 The standard of prudence to be used by CSDOC internal staff shall be the
"prudent person"standard defined below in Section 3.1.1, and shall be
applied in the context of managing an overall portfolio. Investment staff
acting in accordance with written procedures and the investment policy and
exercising due diligence shall be relieved of personal responsibility for an
individual security's credit risk or market price changes, provided deviations
from expectations are reported in a timely fashion and appropriate action is
taken to control adverse developments.
3.1.1 The Prudent Person Standard: Investments shall be
made wdh judgment and care—under circumstances then prevailing—
which persons of prudence, discretion and intelligence exercise in the
management of their own affairs, not for speculation, but for
investment, considering the probable safety of their capital as well as
the probable income to be derived.
4.0 Investment Objectives:
The primary objectives, in priority order, of CSDOC's investment activities shall be:
; �'hes � sddprs '�t�trn ,� itf��as#hefa amp;
Sid e ! 11s i
r�e � �ec#to'6� 1 d"rl�fine fY�l� a .
�� � � ���dfn�i��d�t . V z"""an •" •11a
re tr n "
e (1 jig¢ ri The CSDOC invest"rt It G• tT1#fi FIJ� G if t1k
td managed�with1he objective of achieving a rate"of'returrrtt�roughout
Budgetary and economic,cycles, commensurate with legal, safety, and
trctuidity considerations,
Page 2 of 12
5.0 Delegation of Authority:
Y
5.1 Authority to manage CSDOC's investment program is derived from the
California Government Code Sections 53600 et seq. and Sections 53635 et
seq. The Boards of Directors hereby delegates management responsibility
for the CSDOC investment program to it's _ t e Treasurer,
who shall establish written procedures for a operation of investment
program consistent with this Policy « � #
4 t d
„ � xkle
„" , etrt NtJh fhis pJacy -No person may engage in
an investment transaction except as provied under the terms of this Policy
and the procedures established by the Treasurer. The Treasurer shall be
responsible for all transactions undertaken by CSDOC internal staff, and shall
establish a system of controls to regulate the activities of internal staff and
external investment advisors engaged in accordance with Section 5.3.
M If
Ysw7lFprcvtc7efar, m)ked xzgJ
'ty , quarterly reports to the Finan
� gmmittee, and the Boardsf
�w Hy-accepted accouhTig.fiffift
Board.
ab marks for performance me"
abiisfirnenf of a system �" ;al contrite
2.5 Establishment of written "dures for competitive bids a
offn engs of securities that , be P, ased or sold by internal CSD
staff. , w
5 2,6 Establishment of a' Desks„ Menu'
operations and management - --
5.3 The Boards of Directors of CSDOC may, in its discretion, engage the
services of one or more registered investment advisors to assist in the
management of CSDOC's investment portfolio in a manner consistent with
CSDOC's objectives Such external investment advisors ,`e
a T throtlgii a » ire prDCes ,-rshall be granted disc etion to
our se and sell investment securities in accordance with this Investment
Policy. Such advisors must be registered under the Investment Advisers Act
of 1940, or be exempt from such registration.
Page 3 of 12
6.0 Ethics and Conflicts of Interest:
6.1 Officers and employees of CSDOC involved in the investment process shall
refrain from personal business activities that could conflict with proper
execution of CSDOC's investment program, or which could impair their ability
to make impartial investment decisions. Employees and investment officials
shall disclose to the General Manager any material financial interests in
financial institutions that conduct business within CSDOC's boundaries, and
they shall further disclose any large personal financial/investment positions,
the performance of which could be related to the performance of positions in
CSDOC's portfolio.
7.0 Authorized Financial Dealers and Institutions:
7.1 For investment transactions conducted by CSDOC internal staff, the
Treasurer will maintain a list of financial institutions authorized to provide
investment services to CSDOC, including "primary or regional dealers that
kit Cfipda? ul9j<`� ndFedera .to Gf Gl r banks: N
public deposit shall be made except in s qualifi pu is deposltory as
established by State law.
All financial institutions which desire to become qualified bidders for
investment transactions with CSDOC must supply the following:0900'Td rtii
by the Treasurer.
7.1.1. Audited financial statements for the institution's three (3) most
recent fiscal years.
7.1.2. A statement in ttie{pf i Gouarnrtleni Finarf
Officers Association {GFOA} certi mg (fiat tiie mstduhons-reviews
CSDOC's Investment Policy and that all securities offered to the Districts
shall comply fully and in every instance with all provisions of the California
Government Code and with this Investment Policy.
N- 1rt§ It dealer, and the
. .' Via.
Selection of financial institutions, broker/dealers, and banks authorized to
engage in transactions with CSDOC shall I
r
annual review of the financial con dwn of qua1 ie mstdutions
wi11 be conducted by the Treasurer.
Page 4 of 12
7.2 Selection of broker/dealers used by external investment advisors retained by
v CscOC i4;K f b ftrdoiritrli Tsiprls'b�twe csnt
nve timeeraty 7 °bs !n s s rrafty�fhe
.Ort#Iq
� pr, •: e� a � ..: ;��¢Et z x e sir�.e 6r �r� t� '�,. ° �e�Ct�e� ,eke ,rrn ee propri�t� exter,�t
�! t1r�rns�are 1:crnpekitz� P�ri� � ail�e ���"i��gs anct
8.0 Authorized and Suitable Investments:
All investments shall be made in accordance with Sections 53600 at seq. of the
Government Code of California, and as described within this Investment Policy. Permitted
investments under this Policy shall include:
8.1 Securities issued by the US Government or an agency of the US
Government and fully guaranteed as to payment by the US Government or
agency of the US Government. Investment in mortgage-backed bonds and
CMOs is not governed by this Section 8.1, even if such bonds are issued by
agencies of the US Government. See Section 8.2 for conditions of purchase
of mortgage-backed securities. See Section 8.11 for conditions of purchase
of CMOs.
8.2 Mortgage-backed securities issued by an agency of the US Government,
provided that the stated final maturity of such securities does not exceed five
(5) years from the date of purchase.
8.3 Commercial paper rated a minimum of TV by Moody's Investor Services
(Moody's), or"Al" by Standard & Poor's Inc. (S&P) provided that: (a)the
maturity does not exceed 180 days from the date of purchase; (b) the issuer
is a corporation organized and operating in the United States with assets in
excess of$500 million; and (c) no more than 15% of the portfolio is invested
in commercial paper, except that a maximum of 30% of the portfolio may be
invested in commercial paper, so long as the average maturity of all
commercial paper in the portfolio does not exceed 31 days.
Page 5 of 12
8.4 Banker's acceptances issued by institutions, the short-term obligations of
which are rated a minimum of "P1" by Moody's, or "At" by S&P provided v
that: (a) the acceptance is eligible for purchase by the Federal Reserve
System; (b) the maturity does not exceed 270 days; and (c) no more than
40% of the total portfolio may be invested in banker's acceptances.
8.5 Medium term (or corporate) notes issued by corporations organized and
operating within the United States or by depository institutions licensed by the
United States or any state and operating within the United States, the long-
term obligations of which are rated at least "a3" by Moody's, or"A-" by S&P.
No more than 30% of the portfolio may be invested in eligible medium term
or corporate notes.
8.6 Shares of mutual funds investing in securities permitted under this policy
and under California Government Code Section 53601. Such funds must
either: (1) attain the highest ranking, or the highest letter and numerical
rating, provided by not less than two of the three largest nationally
recognized rating services; or(2) have an investment Advisor registered with
the Securities and Exchange Commission with not less than five years of
experience investing in the securities and obligations authorized under this
Policy and under California Government Code Section 53601, and with
assets under management in excess of$500 million. The purchase price of
such shares may not include any commissions. Investment in mutual funds
may not exceed 15% of the total portfolio.
8.7 Certificates of deposit:
8.7.1 Secured(collateralized)time deposits in banks meeting the
following criteria: (a) in good standing with the California State Collateral
Pool; and (b) having a net operating profit in the two (2) most recently
completed fiscal years.
8.7.2 Negotiable certificates of deposit(NCDs) issued by financial
institutions which shall have long-term debt rated "A3" or higher by Moody's,
or "A-" or higher by S&P; or have short-term debt rated at least "P1" by
Moody's, or"At"by S&P; or as otherwise approved by the Districts' Boards
of Directors.
8.8 Taxable or tax-exempt municipal bonds issued by the State of California
or its subdivisions. Such securities must be rated "A3" or higher by Moody's,
or"A-" or higher by S&P; or as otherwise approved by the Districts' Boards
of Directors.
8.9 The State of California Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF).
8.10 The Orange County Investment Pool.
Page 6 of 12
8.11 Collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs) issued by agencies of the US
v Government with a maximum stated final maturity of five years and asset-
backed securities rated "Aaa" by Moody's S&P and "AAA" by S&P, with a
maximum final stated maturity of five (5) years. Securities eligible for
purchase under this Section 8.11 shall be issued by an issuer having a rating
on its unsecured long-term debt of"A" or higher. Combined purchases of
CMOs and asset-backed securities as authorized under this Section 8.11
may not exceed 20% of the total portfolio.
8.12 Repurchase agreements provided that:
8.12.1 All repurchase agreements shall be collateralized with securities
eligible for purchase under this Policy, and are maintained at a level of at
least 102% of the market value of the repurchase agreements. Collateral
securities shall be delivered to a third-party safekeeping agent or to
CSDOC's custodian bank.
I
8.13 Reverse repurchase agreements provided that:
8.13.1 Generally, no more than 20% of CSDOC's portfolio shall be
invested in reverse repurchase agreements, and there shall be no long-term
reverse repurchase agreements unless otherwise authorized by the Districts'
Boards of Directors.
8.13.2 The maximum maturity of reverse repurchase agreements shall
be ninety (90) days.
8.13.3 Reverse repurchase agreements shall mature on the exact date
of a known cash flow which will be unconditionally available to repay the
maturing reverse repurchase.
8.13.4 Proceeds of reverse repurchase agreements shall be used solely
to supplement portfolio income or to provide portfolio liquidity, and shall not
be used to speculate on market movements.
Page 7 of 12
8.14 Sales of CSDOC-owned securities in the secondary market may incur losses
in order to improve the risk or return characteristics of the portfolio, to prevent o
anticipated further erosion of principal, or when trading for securities that
result in an expected net economic gain to CSDOC.
8.15 If securities owned by the CSDOC are downgraded by either Moody's or
S&P to a level below the quality required by this Investment Policy, it shall
be CSDOC's policy to review the credit situation and make a determination
as to whether to sell or retain such securities in the portfolio. If a decision is
made to retain the downgraded securities in the portfolio, their presence in
the portfolio will be monitored and reported monthly to the CSDOC General
Manager, the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee and
Boards of Directors.
9.0 Collateralization:
Sommer:_......,_..+_N..�.,_.... t +
10.0 Safekeeoina and Custody:
10.1 All securities transactions, including collateral for repurchase agreements,
entered into by, or on behalf of CSDOC, shall be conducted on a
delivery-versus-payment(DVP) basis. Securities will be held by CSDOC's
third party custodian ban "
process nr'lhatsgenE ,,
1=edgra)ReseNe 8enk; Mew arced liy sae eepmg receipts.
11.0 Diversification:
Ada z, ot1 rn
11.1 There is no limit on investment in securities issued by or guaranteed by the
full faith and credit of the U.S. government.
11.2 No more than 20% of the portfolio may be invested in securities of a single
agency of the U.S. government, which does not provide the full faith and
credit of the U.S. government.
11.3 No more than 5% of the portfolio may be invested in securities of any one
issuer, other than the U.S. government or its agencies.
Page 8 of 12
11.4 No individual holding shall constitute more than 5% of the total debt
v outstanding of any issuer.
11.5 No more than 40% of the portfolio may be invested in banker's acceptances.
11.6 No more than 15% of the portfolio may be invested in commercial paper,
except that 30% of the portfolio may be so invested so long as the average
maturity of all commercial paper in the portfolio does not exceed 31 days.
11.7 No more than 30% of the portfolio may be invested in medium-term
(corporate) notes.
11.8 No more than 15% of the portfolio may be invested in mutual funds.
11.9 No more than 30% of the portfolio may be invested in negotiable certificates
of deposit.
11.10 No more than 10% of the portfolio may be invested in eligible municipal
bonds.
11.11 No more than 20% of the portfolio may be invested in a combination of
CMOs and asset-backed securities. CMOs and asset-backed securities may
only be purchased by the Districts' external money managers with prior
Board approval, and may not be purchased by the Districts' staff.
11.12 No more than the lesser of 15% of the portfolio or the statutory maximum
may be invested in LAIF.
11.13 No more than 15% of the portfolio may be invested in the Orange County
Investment Pool.
11-.14 No more than 20% of the portfolio may be invested in repurchase
agreements.
12.0 Maximum Maturities:
ra� l,�ttertiPt rS�f) td is tvesTmenlswith aq
.
anticip ff qd .. The Treasurer shall develop a five-year cash flow
fo�eces she I be uprf`ated quarterly. Based on this forecast, the Treasurer shall
designate, from time-to-time, the amounts to be allocated to the investment portfolio.
CSDOC monies invested in accordance with this Policy are divided into two (2) categories:
12.1 Liquid Operating Monies. Funds needed for current operating and capital
expenditures are known as Liquid Operating Monies.
12.1.1 The maximum final stated maturity of individual securities in the
Liquid Operating Monies account portfolio shall be one (1) year from the date
of purchase.
Page 9 of 12
12.1.2 The average duration of the Liquid Operating Monies account
portfolio shall be recommended by the Treasurer based on the Districts' cash v
flow requirements, but may never exceed NQ days, and shall be reviewed
and approved by the Finance, Administration and Human Resources
Committee, and shall be updated as needed.
12.2 Long Term Operating Monies. Funds needed for longer term purposes are
known as the Long Term Operating Monies.
12.2.1 The maximum final stated maturity of individual securities in the
Long Term Operating Monies account portfolio shall be five (5) years from
the date of purchase, unless otherwise authorized by the Districts' Boards of
Directors.
12.2.2 The duration of the Long Term Operating Monies account portfolio
shall be recommended by the Treasurer based on the Districts' five-year
cash flow forecast, shall be reviewed and approved by the Finance,
Administration and Human Services Committee, and shall be updated as
needed.
12.2.3 The duration of the Long Tenn Operating Monies account portfolio
shall never exceed 120% of the duration as established in accordance with
Section 12.2.2.
12.2.4 The duration of the Long Term Operating Monies account portfolio
shall never be less than 80% of the duration as established in accordance
with Section 12.2.2
13.0 Internal Controls:
13.1 The Treasurer shall establish an annual process of independent review by an
external auditor. This review will provide internal control by assuring
compliance with policies and procedures.
14.0 Performance Objectives and Benchmarks:
14.1 Overall objective. The investment portfolio of CSDOC shall be designed
with the overall objective of obtaining a rate of return throughout budgetary
and economic cycles, commensurate with investment risk constraints and
reasonably anticipated cash flow needs.
Page 10 of 12
14.2 The Liquid Operating Monies. The investment performance objective for
v the Liquid Operating Monies shall be to earn a total rate of return over a
market cycle which exceeds the return on a market index approved by the
Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee, and by the
Districts' Boards of Directors, when the duration of the portfolio is
established 1T1___ bit
14.3 The Long Tenn Operating Monies. The investment performance objective
for the Long Term Operating Monies shall be to earn a total rate of return
over a market cycle which exceeds the return on a market index selected by
the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee and approved
by the Districts' Boards of Directors, when the duration of the portfolio is
established. >::, � _ „��(�. .. •.. : �j�
15.0 Reporting:
15.1 Monthly anid q "investment reports shall be submitted by the Treasurer
to the Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee which shall
forward the reports to the Districts' Boards of Directors. {
shall betl6TtEhi t These repo s
shall disclose, at a mmrmum, t e o oHnng information about the risk
characteristics of CSDOC's portfolio:
15.1.1 Cost and accurate and complete market value of the portfolio.
15.1.2 Modified duration of the portfolio compared to Benchmark.
15.1.3 Dollar change in value of the portfolio for a 1% change in interest
rates.
15.1.4 Percent of portfolio invested in reverse repurchase agreements,
and a schedule which matches the maturity of such reverse repurchase
agreements with the cash flows which are available to repay them at
maturity.
15.1.5 For the Liquid Operating Monies account only, the percent of
portfolio maturing within 90 days.
15.1.6 Average portfolio credit quality.
15.1.7 Percent of portfolio with credit ratings below "A" by any rating
agency, and a description of such securities.
Page 11 of 12
ff01 €�rWde,a listing of any transactions or s
"os which do not comply wd liis policy or with the California
Government Code.
15.1.9 Time-weighted total rate of return for the portfolio for the prior
three months, twelve months, year to date, and since inception compared to
the Benchmark returns for the same periods.
151.10 s are available for
1Ae rerafin$ax'p requ 1 thenextsaxrna
tereasons:for x cHalt.
15.2 CSDOC's Treasurer shall meet quarterly with the Finance, Administration
and Human Resources Committee to review investment performance,
proposed strategies and compliance with this investment policy.
16.0 Investment Policy Adoption and Revision:
16.1 The Investment Policy of CSDOC shall be reviewed by the Finance,
Administration and Human Resources Committee and shall be adopted by
resolution of the Boards of Directors of CSDOC. The Policy shall be
reviewed on an annual basis by the Finance, Administration and Human
Resources Committee, which shall recommend revisions, as appropriate, to
the Boards of Directors. Any modifications made thereto shall be approved
by the Boards of Directors.
16.2 The Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee shall serve
as the oversight committee for the Districts' Investment program and shall
adopt guidelines for the ongoing review of duration, quality and liquidity of the
Districts' portfolio.
Page 12 of 12
APPENDIX "A"
SUMMARY OF INVESTMENT AUTHORIZATION
INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL MANAGERS
SHORT TERM OPERATING FUND
INVESTMENT INTERNAL EXTERNAL
U.S. Treasuries OK OK
Federal Agencies Fixed coupon, fixed mat. OK
Mortgage-backed NO NO
Commercial paper OK OK
Banker's Accept. OK OK
Medium Term Notes Fixed coupon, fixed mat.' OK
Mutual Funds Money Market Only" Money Market Only
Negotiable CDs Fixed coupon, fixed mat.' OK
Municipal Bonds OK" NO
LAIF OK NO
OCIP OK NO
CMOs NO NO
Asset-backed NO NO
Repurchase Agree. OK OK
Reverse Re os OK` OK
LONG TERM OPERATING PORTFOLIO
INVESTMENT INTERNAL EXTERNAL
U.S. Treasuries OK OK
Federal Agencies Fixed coupon, fixed mat. OK
Mortgage-backed NO OK
Mutual Funds Money Market Only" OK
Negotiable CDs Fixed coupon, fixed mat.' OK
Municipal Bonds OK' OK
LAIF OK NO
OCIP OK NO
CMOs NO With Board Approval
Asset-backed NO With Board Approval
Repurchase Agree. OK OK
Reverse Re os OK' OK
'With prior approval of the Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee.
"Using financial institutions approved by the Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee.
JWPa^CIFlMCRANEIMVMKV INVEW.Po
e
APPENDIX "B,,
RESOLUTION NO.
ADOPTING THE DISTRICTS' INVESTMENT POLICY
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13
AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE
DISTRICTS' INVESTMENT POLICY; ADOPTING INVESTMENT
PERFORMANCE REPORTS AND SCHEDULE OF FREQUENCY
OF INVESTMENT PERFORMANCE REPORTS; REPEALING
RESOLUTIONS NOS. 95-14, 95-15 AND 95-78; AND RESCINDING
MINUTE ORDER OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF MAY 24,
1995 APPROVING THE DISTRICTS' INVESTMENT POLICY
WHEREAS, on February 8, 1995, the Boards of Directors adopted Resolutions Nos.
9514 and 95-15, approving interim investment policies following the Orange County bankruptcy
and before the Districts' permanent Investment Policy was adopted; and,
WHEREAS, on May 24, 1995, the Boards of Directors adopted, by Minute Order, a
comprehensive Investment Policy; and,
WHEREAS, on July 26, 1995, the Boards of Directors adopted Resolution No. 95-78,
establishing specific performance benchmarks and objectives, together with a schedule of
frequency of investment performance reports; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to California Government Code Section 53646, the Districts are
required to review their Investment Policy annually and re-adopt their Policy at a public meeting,
which Policy will establish specific performance benchmarks and objectives, and specific
performance monitoring and reporting.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California.
0
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt the Investment Policy of the
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California, as set forth on Exhibit "A," attached
hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
Section 2: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt the following specific
performance benchmarks for their two investment funds in accordance with Section 14.0 of the
Districts' Investment Policy.
LIQUID OPERATING MONIES-The Short-Tenn Operating Fund will be
compared to the three-month T-bill rate, and the Callan Active Cash Fixed Income Style Group.
The Callan Active Cash Fixed Income Style Group represents a peer group of managers who
operate with a maximum maturity of one year.
LONG-TERM OPERATING MONIES - The Long-Tenn Operating Fund will be
compared to the Merrill Lynch Government and Corporate One-to-Five Year Maturity Index and
to the Callan Defensive Fixed Income Style Group.
Section 3: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt a performance monitoring and
reporting schedule, as required by Section 15.0 of the Districts' Investment Policy, which
schedule is attached hereto as Exhibit "B"and incorporated herein by reference.
Section 4: That Resolution Nos. 94-14, 95-15 and 95-78 are hereby repealed, and
the Minute Order of the Boards of Directors of May 24, 1995, approving the Districts' Investment
Policy is hereby rescinded.
Section 5: This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 25, 1996.
2
EXHIBIT "B"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING
FOR THE
DISTRICTS' INVESTMENT PROGRAM
POLICY
REFERENCE PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTIC REPORTING PARTY*
PIMCO MELLON CALLAN
15.1.1 Cost and market value of the portfolio (monthly mark-ta-market). M,0 M,Q Q
15.1.2 Modified duration of the portfolio compared to benchmark. M,Q 0
15.1.3 Dollar change in value of the portfolio for a 1%change In interest rate. M,Q Q
15.1.4 Percent of portfollo Invested in reverse repurchase agreements, and a schedule which matches the
maturity of such reverse repurchase agreements with the cash flows which are available to repay
them at maturity. M,q
15.1.5 For the Liquid Operating Monies account only,the percent ofpodfolio maturing within 90 days. M,Q 0
15.1.6 Average portfolio credit quality. M,Q 0
15.1.7 Percent of portfolio with credit ratings below Why any rating agency, and a description of such
securities. M,Q 0
15.1.8 Listing of any transactions or holdings which do not comply with this policy or with the California
Government Code. M,Q
15.1.9 Time-weighted total rate of return for the portfolio for the prior three months,twelve months,year-
to-date,and since inception compared to the benchmark retume for the same periods. M,Q Q
ADDL" Comparison of portfolio performance to market index benchmark. M,Q Q
ADDL" Comparison of Manager's performance to peer group benchmark. 0
ADDL" Monitoring or organizational and structural changes of Investment management firm. Q
ADDL•' Audit portfolios for compliance with investment policy guidelines. Q
15.1.10 CSDOC will report if sufficient funds are available for it to meet operating expenditure requirements for the next six months,or if not,stale the
reasons for the shortfall.
Notes
'M=Monthly
Q=Quanedy
"ADDL=Monitoring of Additional Performance Cheractedstics �awvoonewcmwtvav¢sr.nrwommoa.art
APPENDIX "C"
GLOSSARY OF INVESTMENT TERMS
Agencies. Shorthand market terminology for any obligation issued by a government-
sponsored entity(GSE), or a federally related institution. Obligations of GSEs
are not guaranteed by the full faith and credit of the US government. There are
eight GSEs, five of which are currently active in the new issue market. The five
include:
FFCB. The Federal Farm Credit Bank System provides credit and liquidity in the
agricultural industry. FFCB issues discount notes and bonds.
FHLB. The Federal Home Loan Bank provides credit and liquidity in the housing
market. FHLB issues discount notes and bonds.
FHLMC. Like FHLB, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation provides
credit and liquidity in the housing market. FHLMC, also called "FreddieMac"
issues discount notes, bonds and mortgage pass-through securities.
FNMA. Like FHLB and FreddieMac, the Federal National Mortgage Association
was established to provide credit and liquidity in the housing market. FNMA, also
known as "FannieMee," issues discount notes, bonds and mortgage pass-
through securities.
SLMA. The student loan marketing association, also known as "SallieMae;
provides liquidity to private lenders who make various types of loans for
education. SLMA currently issues floating rate notes.
Federally related institutions are arms of the federal government. Most do not issue
securities directly into the market. Those which do issue directly include the following:
GNMA. The Government National Mortgage Association, known as
"GinnieMae," issues mortgage pass-through securities which are guaranteed by
the full faith and credit of the US Government.
PEFCO. The Private Export Funding corporation assists exporters. Obligations
of PEFCO are not guaranteed by the full faith and credit of the US government.
TVA. The Tennessee Valley Authority provides flood control and power and
promotes development in portions of the Tennessee, Ohio and Mississippi River
valleys. TVA currently issues discount notes and bonds.
Amortized Cost. Measure of the cost of a security whereby the cost value will change
over time as the discount or premium paid for the security is gradually
incorporated into the principal value as interest payments are received.
Page 1 of 7
e
Asked. The price at which a seller offers to sell a security.
Asset-backed securities. Securities collateralized with consumer receivables, such as
automobile loans, credit card receivables, or home equity loans, which are
owned by the issuer, but placed with a trustee for the benefit of the investor.
Average life. In mortgage-related investments, including CMOs, the average time to
expected receipt of principal payments, weighted by the amount of principal
expected.
Banker's acceptance. A money market instrument created to facilitate international
trade transactions. It is highly liquid and safe because the risk of the trade
transaction is transferred to the bank which "accepts" the obligation to pay the
investor.
Benchmark. A comparison security or portfolio. A performance benchmark is a partial
market index which reflects the mix of securities allowed under a specific
investment policy.
Bid. The price at which a buyer offers to buy a security.
Broker. A broker brings buyers and sellers together for a transaction for which the
broker receives a commission. A broker does not sell securities from his own
position.
Bullet structure. A portfolio strategy in which a manager overweights both the short
and long end of the yield curve, and underweights the middle part of the curve.
Certificate of Deposit (CD). A time deposit with a specific maturity evidenced by a
certificate. Large denomination CDs may be marketable.
Collateral. Securities or cash pledged by a borrower to secure repayment of a loan or
repurchase agreement. Also, securities pledged by a financial institution to
secure deposits of public moneys.
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations (CMO). Classes of bonds which redistribute the
cash flows of mortgage securities (and whole loans) to create securities which
have different levels of prepayment risk, as compared to the underlying mortgage
securities.
Commercial paper. The short-term unsecured debt of corporations.
Conditional prepayment rate (CPR). A measure of mortgage prepayment activity. It
assumes that a constant fraction of the principal prepays each month and is
based on the previous month's remaining balance. The rate is expressed as an
annualized percentage. For instance, a CPR of 6% indicates that each month 6%
of the remaining principal balance prepays on an annualized basis.
Page 2 of 7
e
Convexity. The rate of change in a bond's price as duration changes. It is a
particularly important component of price change for longer term bonds, or for
large changes in interest rates.
Cost Yield. The annual income from an investment divided by the purchase cost.
Because it does not give effect to premiums and discounts which may have been
included in the purchase cost, it is an incomplete measure of return.
Coupon. The rate at which a bond pays interest.
Credit risk. The risk that principal and/or interest on an investment will not be paid in a
timely manner due to changes in the condition of the issuer.
Current yield. The annual income from an investment divided by the current market
value. Since the mathematical calculation relies on the current market value
rather than the investor's cost, current yield is unrelated to the actual return the
investor will earn if the security is held to maturity.
Dealer. A dealer acts as a principal in security transactions, selling securities from and
buying securities for his own position.
Debenture. A bond secured only by the general credit of the issuer.
Derivative. Any security that has principal and/or interest payments which are subject
to uncertainty (but not for reasons of default or credit risk) as to timing and/or
amount, or any security which represents a component of another security which
has been separated from other components ("Stripped" coupons and principal). A
derivative is also defined as a financial instrument the value of which is totally or
partially derived from the value of another instrument, interest rate or index.
Discount. The difference between the par value of a bond and the cost of the bond,
when the cost is below par. Some short-term securities, such as Tbills and
banker's acceptances, are known as discount securities. They sell at a
discount from par, and return the par value to the investor at maturity without
additional interest. Other securities, which have fixed coupons trade at a
discount when the coupon rate is lower than the current market rate for securities
of that maturity and/or quality.
Diversification. Dividing investment funds among a variety of investments to avoid
excessive exposure to any one source of risk.
Duration. The weighted average time to maturity of a bond where the weights are the
present values of the future cash flows. Duration measures the price sensitivity
of a bond to changes in interest rates. (See modified duration and effective
duration).
Page 3 of 7
Effective duration. Measures the price volatility of a fixed income security that °
contains embedded options. A more accurate measure of price volatility when
the cash flow characteristics of the bond change when interest rates shift.
Federal funds rate. The rate of interest charged by banks for short term loans to other
banks. It is established by the Federal Reserve Bank through open-market
operations.
Federal Open Market Committee. A committee of the Federal Reserve Board which
establishes monetary policy and executes it through temporary and permanent
changes to the supply of bank reserves.
Ladder structure. A portfolio strategy in which a manager attempts to weight securities
equally across the yield curve.
Leverage. Borrowing funds in order to invest in securities which have the potential to
pay earnings at a rate higher than the cost of borrowing.
Liquidity. The speed and ease with which an asset can be converted to cash.
Market risk. The risk that the value of securities will fluctuate with changes in overall
market conditions or interest rates.
Market value. The price at which a security can be traded.
Marking to market. The process of posting current market values for securities in a
portfolio.
Maturity. The final date upon which the principal of a security becomes due and
payable.
Medium term note. A corporate bond which is brought to market over a period of time
rather than at a single offering. Generally issued as senior unsecured obligations
of the borrower.
Modified duration. Measures the percentage price volatility of a fixed income security
or portfolio. Modified duration approximates the change in price for small
changes in interest rates, assuming that the cash flow characteristics do not
change when the yield curve shifts.
Money market. The market in which short term debt instruments (Tbills, discount
notes, commercial paper and banker's acceptances) are issued and traded.
Mortgage Pass Through Securities. Securities collateralized with residential
mortgage loans, the principal and interest payments of which are distributed, or
"passed-through" to the investor. Many of these securities are issued by
agencies of the federal government, including GNMA and FHLMC.
Page 4 of 7
Mutual fund. An entity which pools the funds of investors and invests those funds in a
set of securities which is specifically defined in the fund's prospectus. Mutual
funds can be invested in various types of domestic and/or international stocks,
bonds and money market instruments, as set forth in the individual fund's
prospectus. For most large, institutional investors, the costs associated with
investing in mutual funds are higher than the investor can obtain through an
individually managed portfolio.
Negative convexity. A phenomenon associated with bonds which have embedded call
options, it measures the rate at which duration of a callable bond gets smaller as
interest rates fall. Negative convexity is an undesirable characteristics in bonds.
PSA Standard Prepayment Model (PSA). A measure of mortgage prepayment
activity. The model is expressed as a monthly series of annual prepayment
rates. The series begins at .2% per year in the first month, and increases by .2%
per year in each successive month until month 30, where it levels out at 6% per
year until maturity. This series is labeled 100 PSA. 200 PSA doubles this series,
and 50 PSA would cut the series in half.
Option adjusted spread. A measure of the value of a bond relative to a benchmark
security, which takes into account the value of the embedded option inherent in
any bond that has uncertain cash flows (i.e., callable bonds).
Premium. The difference between the par value of a bond and the market value of the
bond, when the market value is above par.
Prepayment speed. A measure of how quickly principal is repaid to investors in
mortgage securities.
Prepayment window. The time period over which principal repayments will be
received on mortgage securities at a specified prepayment speed.
Prudent man (person) rule. A standard of responsibility which applies to fiduciaries.
In California, the rule is stated as "Investments shall be managed with the care,
skill, prudence and diligence, under the circumstances then prevailing, that a
prudent person, acting in a like capacity and familiar with such matters, would
use in the conduct of an enterprise of like character and with like aims to
accomplish similar purposes."
Realized return. The change in value of the portfolio due to interest received and
interest earned and realized gains and losses. It does not give effect to changes
in market value on securities which have not been sold from the portfolio.
Repurchase agreement (RP, Repo). Short term purchases of securities with a
simultaneous agreement to sell the securities back at a higher price. From the
seller's point of view, the same transaction is a reverse repurchase agreement.
Page 5 of 7
Safekeeping. A service to bank customers whereby securities are held by the bank In
the customer's name.
Scenario analysis. A portfolio management technique that measures the performance
of the portfolio under varying scenarios including, but not limited to, interest rate
movements, spread changes and nonparallel yield curve shifts.
Structured note. A complex, fixed income instrument which pays interest based on a
formula tied to other interest rates, commodities or indices. Examples include
inverse floating rate notes which have coupons that increase when other interest
rates are falling, and which fall when other interest rates are rising, and "dual
index floaters," which pay interest based on the relationship between two other
interest rates -for example, the yield on the ten-year Treasury note minus the
Libor rate. Issuers of such notes lock in a reduced cost of borrowing by
purchasing interest rate swap agreements.
Total rate of return. A measure of a portfolio' performance over time. It is the internal
rate of return which equates the beginning value of the portfolio with the ending
value, and includes interest earnings and realized and unrealized gains and
losses on the portfolio.
U.S. Treasury obligations. Securities issued by the U.S. Treasury and backed by the
full faith and credit of the United States. Treasuries are considered to have no
credit risk, and are the benchmark for interest rates on all other securities in the
US and overseas. The Treasury issues both discounted securities and fixed
coupon notes and bonds.
Treasury bills. All securities issued with initial maturities of one year or less are
issued as discounted instruments, and are called Treasury bills. The Treasury
currently issues three- and six-month Tbills at regular weekly auctions. It also
issues "cash management" bills as needed to smooth out cash flows.
Treasury notes. All securities issued with initial maturities of two to ten years
are called Treasury notes, and pay interest semi-annually.
Treasury bonds. All securities issued with initial maturities greater than ten
years are called Treasury bonds. Like Treasury notes, they pay interest semi-
annually.
Volatility. The rate at which security prices change with changes in general economic
conditions or the general level of interest rates.
Yield to Maturity (YTM). The annualized internal rate of return on an investment which
equates the expected cash flows from the investment to its cost.
Page 6 of 7
Yield to maturity (at market). The discount rate that equates the present value
of the promised cash flow (interest payments and redemption value)to the market
price, assuming that all cash flows are invested at the YTM rate.
Yield to maturity (at purchase cost). The YTM that equates to the purchase
price of the security
Page 7 of 7
F.itsd �a AGENDA
ITEM
IN
N� ' TRANSMITTAL
r
� ;R IBIS QArm.;Ng„
MEETING DATE .. COMM.:10.N0. DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION (Inflials of Originator)
OMITS: _„OMITS
PDC: PDC = +1
FAHR:9-11-96 FAHR "� All 2520 Mike Peterman ext.210E
EXEC: n EXEC • d,.,,+.:
STEER' :STEER Division No.,Name,and Extension
AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION($):
Agenda Wording:
ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 132 PROVIDING ADDITIONAL SERVICE CREDIT FOR RETIREMENT PURPOSES.
(All Districts)
The Director of Human Resources, in conjunction with the FAHR COMMITTEE, recommends that the Directors
adopt the ordinance providing for two years additional service credit to eligible employees who retire between
January 1 and March 31, 1997, in accordance with the provisions of Government Code Section 31641.04.
Recommended Action(s):
Adopt Ordinance No. 132, an Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange
County, California providing eligible District employees to receive two years additional service credit for retirement
purposes.
CEQA REVIEW: Project is Exempt: NOT APPLICABLE DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM:
Date Notice of Exemption Filed:
Negative Declension Approved on
Final EIR Approved on and Notice of Determination(led on June 28, 1995, Ordinance No. 126
BUDGET INFORMATION CURRENTYEAR CURRENTYEAR. YEAR-TO-DATE REVISED BUDGET
TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.: N/A BUDGET AMOUNT TO-DATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL
SOURCE: CORF JO DISTRICTS EXPENDITURES porn lwdvne T—m.R)
ScnedulelLins Item: $0 $0 $0 $0
AMOUNT OF TRANSFER:
Schadul.A-ine Item:
AIT/PROJECT COST INFORMATION ORIGINAL BID,PO, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED PROJECT
CONTRACT FUNDS PREY. REQUESTED THIS AMOUNT
AMOUNT APPROVED An
N/A N/A N/A N/A
WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL] NO REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? YES
If YES,state numlaer: _Permanent Limaed Term If YES,explain in ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section
CONCURRENCES: ATTACHMENTS TO AGENDA(List)
To Committee: 1. AttachmentA
Z. OrAf�nct c" ,Vc . 132-
Signature Date
Division nag r :Or Des -
�, ti1c>v� 9 ?-T-7L
Signature Date TO JI.Bits.: 1. Attachment
Department Head (Or Designee) z . O rd rngn u No . 17 2-
L�ft�l—� C.tJ t.(e wa tf 54te
�4 G
Sig t e Da
Awls nt General Manager(Or Designee)
OMTS COMM. PDC COMM. FAHR COMM. JOINT BOARDS
Meeting Date:
Approved:
Amended:
Forwarded to:
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION(Background anWor Summary)
On March 8, 1995, the Boards adopted Resolution 95-19 which implemented the early retirement incentive
provisions of Govemment Cade Section 31641.04. This resolution allowed the addition of two years service
credit to certain employees otherwise eligible to retire who actually applied for retirement during the period March
1, 1995 through April 30, 1995. The retirement incentive was again offered during the period May 1 through
June 30, 1995, and during the period January 1 through March 30, 1996. Eleven employees elected to
participate in the program during those three window periods resulting in a substantial savings to the Districts.
Salary and benefits cost avoidance over the five-year period FY95- FY99 is estimated at $2,424,096 One
additional employee retired in August, 1996 through a special Board action.
Staff continues to believe that District-wide encouragement of accelerated attrition will have a positive effect on
the organizational change sought by the Districts. Early retirement will provide an effective means of achieving
that objective. By deleting the vacant positions caused by early retirement, the Districts will realize significant
cost savings in salaries and benefits. There are currently 53 employees who meet the eligibility criteria for
retirement. At least eight employees have expressed strong interest in early retirement. If these employees
exercise the early retirement option, it is projected that the Districts will save an additional $939,387 through
FY99 (see exhibit A)
MP:jb
c: Department Head
AGM-Administration
AGM-Operations
General Manager
A?AITSEPT.96 Page 2 of 2
Revision: 82W96
F
6,
MSMS
Total Net Mn1
Date Working Monlhly Annual Position f aTime Net Annual Savings Salary Savings
Retired Y.10 65 Salary Salary Chem CIDERS RIM il�M 9697 9798 W99
Scientist 51195 3 5.281 63.372 Deleted 13.872 10.562 49.500 63.372 63,3n 186,806
Fac Mgr 3/31195 1 5,735 68,820 Deleted 51,402 17,205 17,418 68,520 103,443
Weer 60(1195 2 3,4M 40,800 Deleted 35.497 - 5,303 40,BOD 40,800 d0,800 127,703
Meth Field Super 3/31/95 13 5,M2 60,024 Deleted 31,227 15,008 26,797 60,024 M,024 M,024 223.875
Foreman 3131195 7 4.132 49,586 Deleted 31,768 12,396 17,516 49,554 49.554 0.584 MAN
Meth Field Super 42895 7 5.017 60,204 Deleted 41,030 10,034 19,174 80.2W 60,204 60,21M 209.8M
Subtotal 94-95 Program 28,567 342,804 204,796 65.203 138,WS 273,984 342,SD4 342,KM 1,030,011
Senior Storeskeeper 32896 10 3,648 43,776 Deleted 26.152 10,W4 17,624 43.776 43,776 116,120
NR And 32898 7 3,697 44,31st Deleted 26,504 11,091 17,860 44,35`1 44,364 117,679
Opm Super 1/1556 4 5,105 84,260 Deleted 36,598 28.078 24.662 44,384 44,384 141,468
Oper Super 1115/98 10 5,105 8/980 Deleted W.598 28,078 24,662 61.280 61,2w 175,260
Mice Mgr MEV96 13 6,132 73,384 Deleted 43,960 18,396 29,624 73,554 73,51BI 195,188
Sr.ConaLlnspec BI15IS8 12 5,399 64,768 Deleted 38,705 58,690 26,083 64,788 147,560
SUMotal 95-M Program 29,086 349,032 2W.517 95586 171.122 293,431 332,136 893,275
Total Salary Savings 1,923,886
Total Salary Benefit Savings 500,210
TotalNetSalary8Benefd Savingsof W-%Pro pram 2,626,OB6
Foreman 1/197 11 4.654 55,850 Delete 33.366 27,924 22.484 55,850 106,258
Sr.ConsLlrrpec Mlw 3 4.735 56,821 Delete M.946 14,205 22,675 56.821 93,901
Inslruni Tech II MI97 10 4,251 51.018 Wee M.479 12,753 20,539 51.018 84,310
Sr.Mice.Planner 313197 5 5.549 66,594 Delete 39,784 18,W7 26.810 66.594 110,061
Sr.Plant Ooeralor 39197 6 4.08 53,864 Delete 32,179 13,4841 21,685 53.054 89,013
Lead Mechanic MI97 2 4,108 49,297 Delete 29.451 12,324 19,846 49.297 81,487
Mice.Manager M197 15 6,316 75,799 Delete 45.283 18,9as 30.516 75.799 125,263
Sr.Cleric 39197 4 2.787 33,453 Delete 19,985 8,361 13,468 33,453 55,2B2
Sublalal Proposed 98-97 Program 36,868 442,696 264,4M 124,626 178.223 442,696 745,545
Trial Salary Savings 745.545
Total Salary Benefit Savings 193,842 y
Total Net Salary 8 Benefit Savings of Proposed 9"IF Program 839,387
a
x
Program Trial 1,131,532 8]7,786 85.203 236,590 569,732 81 O,d% 1,117,638 2,869,431 3
m
z
16,953 M.984 148,130 211,759 290,5EBI n8,421
A
82,156 295,588 717,M 1,026,217 1,408.221 3397.852
EARLYRETAB 3:31 PM
ORDINANCE NO. 132
PROVIDING ADDITIONAL SERVICE CREDIT TO ELIGIBLE
DISTRICTS' EMPLOYEES WHO RETIRE EARLY
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE
COUNTY CALIFORNIA PROVIDING FOR AN EARLY
RETIREMENT INCENTIVE PROGRAM BY GRANTING
ADDITIONAL SERVICE CREDIT TO ELIGIBLE DISTRICTS'
EMPLOYEES AS AUTHORIZED BY THE COUNTY
EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT LAW OF 1937,
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 31641.04.
WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts No. 1, 2, 3, 5,
6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 adopted Resolution No. 95-19 and Resolution No. 95-53 approving
an Early Retirement Incentive Program for all eligible Districts' employees, as
authorized by California Government Code Section 31641.04, and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Joint Ownership, Operation and
Construction Agreement by and among County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7,
11, 13 and 14, District No. 1 is the appointed authorized agent to act for every other
District, and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, acting as
agent for County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, adopted
Ordinance No. 126 on June 28, 1995, incorporating all of the same provisions as in
Joint Resolutions Nos. 95-19 and 95-53. and
WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5,
6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 have determined that the manner of performing service, and the
total cost savings of having higher compensated employees retire and lower
compensated employees hired to replace the retirees exceeds the total actuarial cost of
the additional service granted to those who retire under this program.
NOW THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of
Orange County, California, does hereby ORDAIN:
Section I: All regular employees of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange
County, California, who are eligible to participate as members and retire under the
Orange County Employees Retirement System are granted two (2) additional years of
service credit for retirement benefit purposes, provided they retire from regular
employment of the Districts during the period of January 1, 1997 through and including
March 31, 1997.
Section It: The General Manager of the Districts is authorized to execute any
and all contracts of other documents and to transfer all required funds in order to
implement the authorized actions provided for herein.
Section III: The total cost savings of positions filled at a lower level or held
vacant for a period of time shall exceed the total actuarial cost of the additional service
credit granted and related paid leave pay-off costs.
Section IV: This Ordinance shall become effective January 1, 1997.
Section V: The Secretary of the Board shall certify to the adoption of this
Ordinance and shall cause a summary to be published in a newspaper of general
circulation as the District is required by law.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
No. 1 at a regular meeting held September 25, 1996.
Chair of the Board of Directors
County Sanitation District No. 1
of Orange County, California
ATTEST:
Secretary of the Board of Directors
County Sanitation District No. 1
of Orange County, California
J:\WPD000S\0RDMffi 0RD1W WPD
IedawaonM AGENDA
Y
' ITEM
�oa'tXaL�issioN
TRANSMITTAL
� P
�u
MEETING DATE �a3' � DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION (Initials of Onginatop
OMTs: '�' 'i.
PDC' sPDC ."
FAHR. 9/11/96 FAHR 2150,Judy Wilson, Ext.2005
EXEC .....EXEC... s.'# All
STEER: -STEER " Division No.,Name,and Exlenslon
JT.Bos: 925/96 "I
AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
Agenda Wordina:
PROPOSITION 218, RIGHT TO VOTE ON TAXES ACT (All Districts): The Chief Administrative Officer
requests that the Boards go on record in opposition to Proposition 218 which would impose significant and
expensive procedural requirements on the noticing of proposed extensions of, or increases to, user fees. The
proposition also provides for the application of the voter initiative to user fees, which means that a voter initiative
could force a roll-back or reduction in user fees which would have an adverse affect on the Districts' ability to
borrow at low interest rates.
Recommended Action(s):
The Committee recommends that the Districts take no official position opposing Proposition 218, but continue to
participate in gathering and distributing information regarding the potential impacts of the measure.
CEOA REVIEW: Project is Exempt: NOT APPLICABLE DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM:
Date Notice of Exemption Filed
Negative Declaraion Approved on
Final EIR Appro¢d on_and Notice of Determinalion fined on No previous action taken
BUDGET INFORMATION CURRENT YEAR CURRENT YEAR- YEAR404)ATE REVISED BUDGET
TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.: $ BUDGET AMOUNT TOZATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL
SOURCE: CORF JO DISTRICTS EXPENDITURES Rua amen ps Tnmr.nl
SctIeduleA-me Item: N/A N/A N/A N/A
AMOUNT OF TRANSFER:
SctIedule/tine Item:
AIT/PROJECT COST INFORMATION ORIGINAL BID,PO, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED PROJECT
CONTRACT FUNDS PREV. REQUESTED THIS AMOUNT
AMOUNT APPROVED AIT
N/A N/A N/A N/A
WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? NO
CONCURRENCES: ATTACHMENTS TO AGENDA (List)
To Committee: 1. Draft copy of Proposition 218
Signature Date
Division Manager(Or Designee)
Signature Date To Jt. Bds.: 1. Draft copy of Proposition 218
Department Head (Or Designee)
—�. C(Oczd.:a
gnature Date
Assistant General Manager(Or Designee)
OMITS COMM. PDC COMM. FAHR COMM. JOINT BOARDS
Meeting Date-
Approved,
Amended:
Forwardedto:
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION(Background andler Summary)
Proposition 218 will be on the November 1996 ballot. Also known as the Fox Initiative,after its author Joel Fox,Proposition
218 is intended to follow the intent of Proposition 13 requiring voter approval of tax increases. Proposition 218 states that the
'measure protects taxpayers by limiting the methods by which governments exact revenue from taxpayers without their
consent.
Proposition 218 affects the Districts in two significant ways:
1) Initiative Power for Local Taxes,Assessments,Fees and Charges.
Section 3 of the Proposition includes special districts as units of local governments, and states that the initiative power
shall not be prohibited or otherwise limited in matters of reducing or repealing any local tax, assessments,fee or
charge. This would allow a voter initiative to roll-back or repeal user fees. Currently, Districts'property taxes are not
sufficient to meet current debt service and must be supplemented by reserves. If future additional debt is issued,a
user fee increase would be necessary to meet debt service. The extent that such user fees are vulnerable to voter
initiative must be disclosed to the investment community. Such a circumstance may increase the cost of issuance and
affect the marketability of future bonds.
2) Notification Procedures for Fees and Charges.
The initiative includes fees for sanitation within the scope of this measure and requires: that all parcels subject to the
fee be identified;that the amount of the fee must be calculated for each parcel;that written notice be provided by mail
to each owner of record for each identified parcel with the amount of the fee,the basis for the calculation,the reason
for the fee change,and the date,time and location of a public hearing.
A public hearing must be held within 45 days of the notice. At the public hearing,the agency must consider all
protests. If there is a protest by a majority of owners of the identified parcels,no charge to the fee can be imposed.
A fee or charge can not be extended,imposed or increased unless these procedures are followed. Sewer fees are not
subject to the approval requirement of the majority of property owners or 2/3 of the electorate residing in the area.
With over 400,000 parcels,the costs for mailing alone would be$140,000 not including the computer programming to
generate the notice and calculation and the staff time to process ft.
If the proposition should pass,the effective date of Proposition 218 is July 1, 1997.
Attached is a draft copy of the actual language as it will appear on the ballot. This copy was provided by the Secretary of
State's Office and includes the Attorney General's office edits for ballot preparation.
J1WPDOCWGENDAIFAHRW96-AITI.JAW Page 2 of 3
ReNaon: arAW
!90/U(/Jo ld:po
Y �' v�-'� - •ry rW�lJ G- � 71 ,/may
Tact of Proposad LAW L�9�
This initiative measure is submitted to the people in
accordance With the provisions of Article II, Section 8 of the
Constitution.
This initiative measure expressly amends the Constitution by
adding articles thereto; therefore, new provisions proposed to be
added are printed in ItaSic type to i.._ -.ate that they are new.
PROPMEP A➢ ZTIOE OF ARTICLE YIXX C
A= ARTICLE VTTT O
DRAFT /
ee/a7i9s 13:59
P>
1 - �
]RIGHT TO VOTE ON TAXES ACT
ri� swnoril
CTION 1. Tfl'LE. This�ct shall be known and may be cited as the Right to Vote
TaxesAct 2 FINDINGS AND DECLARATIONS. The Keople of the State of California
J hereby find and declare that Proposition 13 was intended to provide effective tax relief
and to-require voter approval of tax increases. However, local governments have
subjected taxpayers to excessive tax, assessment, fee and charge increases that not
0* frustrate the purposes of voter approval for tax increases, but also threaten the
economic security of all Californians and the California economy itself. This measure
protects taxpayers by limiting the methods by which local governments-exact revenue
from taxpayers without their consent -
gSECnON 3. VOTER ROVAL FOR LOCAL. TAX LEVIES. Article XII the
lifomia Constitution
3Ar7i c. le_ X Itl C. C
,qSE t. Definitions.
VIO N
s used in this Vticle:
(a) 'General tax' means any tax imposed for general governmental
purposes.
`t\ (b) 'Laval government' means any county, city, city and county, including
a charter city or county, any special district, or any other local or regional
,NL\, governmental entity. la
�.' (e) 'Special �iszrice means an agency of the state, formed pursuant to
general law orvepecial act for the local performance of govemmental.or
proprietary functions with limited geographic boundaries including, but not limited to, school districts and redevelopmerrtagencies.
Is
(d) 'Special tax' means arty tan imposed for specific purposesfincluding a
taxd6 imposed for specific purposas�which are placed into a general fund.
SEC. 2. Local Govemmant Tax Lintitation.
qziatwithstand ng arty other provision of this Consttudon:
(a) All taxes imposed by any local government shall be deemed to be either
general ty or spPew taxes. Special purpose districts or agencies,
•I including school districts. shall have no power to levy general taxes. `
08/07/96 13:59
Right to Vote on Taxes Act „ k
Page 2 k�
�Q(b) _ No local govemme may impose;extend,or increase any general tax
unless and until tax is submitted to the electorate and approved by
a majority vote. A general tax shall not be deemed to have been
increased if it is imposed at a rate not higher than the maximum rate so
approved. The election required by this subdivision snali be consolidated
with a regularly scheduled general election for members of the governing
body of the local Governmerittexcept in mses of emergency declared by
a unanimous vote of the go ming body.
(c) Any general tax imposed, wandedjor Increased, without voter approval, v
by any local government on or after January 1, 1995, and prior to the
effective data of this '"cle, shall continue to be imposed only if - - - -
approved by a majority vote of the voters voting in an election an the
issue of the imposition,which election shall be held within two years of
the effective date f this.? rticle and in compliance with subdivision (b)
(d) No. local govemme_ nymay' impose, extendjor increase any special tax
unless and until lr tax is submitted to the electorate and approved by
a two-thirds vote. A special tax shall not be deemed to have been
increased it it is imposed at a rate not higher than the maximum rate so
approved.
SEC. 3. Initiative Power 'r Local Taxes, Assessments. Fees and Charges.
(Nerryttistan ing any other p/ision of this Constitution, including, but not limited to,
%�e I'Secdons 8 and 9'the initiative power shall not be prohibited or otherwise
Ii in matters of reducing or repealing any local tax, assessment, fee a. charge.
The power of initiative to affect local taxes, assessments, fees and charges shall be
applicable to all local governments and neither theture nor any local government f
charter stall impose a signebure requirement higher than that applicable to statewide
J statutory initiatives. -
SECTION 4. ASSESSMENT AND PROPERTY RELATED FEE REFORM.
'sae4la�.
fArdde XRR� 1F the California Constitution is herebgaddsd:
rQ :1Art ; e.lP_ X111 [
d SEC 11O pacation.
twitttstaNnding any other provision of law, the provisions df thisViele'shall
apply to OU ��Q+m, te= and chwges)whether imposed pursuant to state
DRAFT '3 -
B0/07/96 14:00
Right to Vote on Taxes Act
Page 3
statute or local government charter authority. Nothing in this�rticle or Article
Xll shag be construed to:
(a) -urovide any new authority to any agency to impose a tax.
assessment, fe%or chargeolo
(b) -affect existing laws relating to the imposition of fees or charges
/J as a condition of property development or 0
\l (c) affect existing laws relating to the imposition of timber yield taxes.
nnVULL�TJ
SEC. Z Oafinitions. lo� 2
As used in this article:
(a) "Agee means any local government as defined in rtiele X111C, ✓
canon t(b).
(b) 'Assessment' means any levy or charge upon real property by an
agency for a special benefit conferred upon the real property.
'Assessment' includes, but is not limited to, 'special
assessment,' 'benefit assessment,' 'maintenance assessment'
and 'special assessment tax."
'r (e) 'Capital cost' means the cost of acquisition, installation,
construction, reconsttucdonn or replacement of a permanent public
improvement by an agency.
(d) 'District' means an area determined by an agency to contain all
parcels which win receive a special benefit from a proposed public
improvement or property-related service.
(e) 'Fee' or 'charge' means any levy other than an ad valorem taut,
a special taxtor an assessment, imposed by an agency upon a
parcel or upon a person as an incident of property ownership,
including causer feep or charge*for a property related service.
a
'\l (f) -Maintenance and operation expenses' means the cost of rent
repair, replacement, rehabilitation, fuel, power, electrical curem,
care, and supervision necessary to properly operate and maintain
a permanent public improvement.
DRAFT �!
08/07/96 14:00
V
Right to Vote on Taxes Act
Page 4 c/
(g) 'Property ownership' shall be deemed to include tenancies of real
property where tenants are directly liable to pay the assessment,
fee, or charge in question.
�Y (h) 'Property-related service' means a public service Y,dving a direct
relationship to property ownership.
(i) 'Special beneW means a particular and distinct benefit over and
above general benefits conferred on real property located in the
district or to the public at large. General enhancement of property
value does not constitute 'special benefrc."
\` SEC. 3. Property Taxes. Assessments, Fees and Charges Limited.
(a! N�essment. feeior charge shall be assessed by any agency upon �
any parcel of property or upon arty person as an incident of property
ownership except:
(t) The ad valorem property tax imposed pursuant to Article XIII and
Article XlljA
e (2) Any s ecial eiving a two-thirds vote pursuant to)Article
�, XIIt�� .
�! (3) Assessments as provided by this, rticle.
11(4) Fees or charges for property related services as provided by this
�Vticle.
\\ (bI For purposes of this Xrticle, fees for the provision of electrical or gas
service shall not be deemed charges or fees imposed as an incident of
property ownership.
sEc. 4. Procedures and Requiremana for Ad Assessment,.
(a)AAn agency which proposes to levy an assessment shall identify all
parcels which will have a special bc(txet conferred upon them and
upon which an assessment will be imposed. The proportionate
special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be
determined in relatio iP to the entirety of the capital east of a _
public improveme ^ a maintenance and operation expenses
of a pubre impmva�wm pf® the cost of the property related
DRAFT S
08i07i96 14:00
Right to Vote on Taxes Act
Page 5 bids
service being provided. Noass shall a imposed on any
parcel which exceeds the on le co of the proportional
special benefit conferred on I. ly special benefits are
assessable, and an agenuy Sep the general benefits
from me special benefits ferred o a parcel. Parcels within a
district that are owner r used any agency, the State of
California or the Un' States shall not be exempt from
assessment unless th agen n demonstrate by clear and
convincing evidence at upi publicly owned parcels in fact
receive n0 special be tfit
1��1( J-
"(b) All assessments� be supported by a detailed engineers report
prepared by a registered professional engineer certified by the
State of California.
(c) The amount of the proposed assessment r each identified parcel
shall be calculated and the record o er of each parcel shall be
given written notice by mail of the proposed assessmem the total
amount thereof ehargeabYpar
entire district, the amoun V
chargeable Lo the Owners parcel, the duration of payments, the reason foressment and he basis upon
which the amount of the proposed assessment was calculated,
together with the date, time, and location of a public hearing on
the proposed assessment. Each notice shall also include, in a
conspicuous place thereon, a summary of the' procedures
applicable to the completion, retumrand tabulation of the ballots
required pursuant to subdivision J(d), including a disclosure
statement that the existence of a majority protest, as defined in
subdivision (e), will result in the assessment not being imposed.
nn pentad' {o A44.
�X (d) Ead+ mailed w owners of de within the
distriR I coritajp�altpt es�ey S address
a}a, far receipt of su allpc Once tom d by arty owner
fng u notice whereby 1211 u� weer may indicate his
or her name, reasonable identification of the patcelrand support or
opposition to the proposed assessmerrL I t;l or, har
'dye) The agency shall conduc, q public hearing upon the proposed
assessment not less than 45 days after mailing the notice of the
proposed assessment to record owners of each identified parcel.
At the public hearing, the agency shall consider all -proms _
against the proposed assessment and tabulate the ballots. The
agency shall.not impose an assessment if there is a majority
DRAFT (�
08107i98 14:0:
Y
Right to Vote on Taxes Act
Page 6
protest. A majority protest exists if, upon the conclusion of the
hearing, ballots submitted in opposition m the assessment exceed
the Won; submitted in favor of the assessment. In tabulating the
ballots, the ballots shall be weighted according to the proporiiunal
�j financial obligation of the affected property.
In In arty legal action contesting the validity of arty assessment, the
burden shall be an thb agency to demonstrate that the property or
properties in question receive a special benefit over and above the
benefits conferred on the public at large and that the amount of
arty contested assessment is proportional to, and no greater than,
the benefits conferred on the property or properties in question.
�(gI Because only special benefits are assessable, electors residing
within the district who do not own property within the district
shall not be deemed under this Constitution to have been deprived
�l of the right to vote for any assessment. If a court determines that
the Constibroon of the United States or otter federal law requires
otherwise, the assessment shall not be imposed unless approved
by a two-thirds vote of the electorate in the district in addition to
being approved by the property owners as required by Son-N-o
el' sob &i '45icy)
SEC, S. Effective Da O
ursuam the provisions of this\4rticte shall become
effective the day after the election unless otherwise provided. Beginning July
1, 1997, all existing, newt or increased assessments shall comply with this
\AMcle. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the following assessments existing on
the effective date of thd\4jt cle shall be exempt from the procedures and
approval process set forth in Section 4:
(al rany assessment imposed exclusively to finance the capital Costs
or maintenance and operation expenses for sidewalks, streets,
newels, waver, flood carrtrdl, drainage systems or vecmr Control.
Subsequent increases in sucri asseissmants-shall be subject to the
procedures and approval process set forth in Section 404D
Q (bl terry assessment imposed pursuant to a petition signed by the
persons owning all of the parcels subject to the assessment at the _
time the assessmem is initially imposed. Subsequent increases in -44P,
sugh assessments shall be subject to the procedures and approval
process set forth in Section 4e Q
2 DRAFT 7 -
0fii07i96 14:02
Right to Vote on Taxes Act - y
Page 7
(c) ,Any assessment the procee of which are exclusively used to
repay banded indeotedn of which the failure to_pay would
violate the Contract Imp ' en i Clause.df the Constitution of the
`United States en o d f
\\ (d) ^ny assessment which previously received ray voter approval
--ftom the voters voting in an election the issue of the
assessment Subsequent Increases in assessments shall be
subject to the procedures and approval process set forth in
Section 4.
SEC. 6. Property Related Fees and Charges- v-,
Procedures for New or Increased Fees and Charges. An agency shall
follow the procedures pursuant to this section in imposing or increasing ✓
any fee or charge as defined pursuant to this Cie including, but not
limited to, the following: ;,
(1) The parcels upon which a fee or charge is proposed for imposition
shall be identified. The amount of the fee or charge proposed to
be imposed upon each parcel shall be calculated. The agency
shall provide written notice by mail of the proposed fee or charge
to the necoro'owner of each identified parcel upon which the fee
or charge is proposed for imposition, the amount of-the fee or _
charge proposed to be imposed upon each, the basis upon which
the amount of the proposed fee or charge was calculated, the
reason for the fee or charge, together with the date, time, and
location of a public heating on the proposed fee or charge.
Q(Z) The agency shall conduct a public hearing upon the proposed fee
or charge not less than 45 days after mailing the notice of the
proposed fee or charge to the record owners of each identified
parcel upon which the fee or charge is proposed for imposition.
At the public hearing, the agency shall consider all protests
against the proposed fee or charge. If written protests against the
propasad fee or charge are presented by a majority of owners of
the identified parcels, the agency shall not impose the fee or
charge.
(bl Requirements for Existing. New or Increased Fees and Charges. A fee
or charge shall not he extended, imposed
lor increased by any agency
unless it meets all of the following requirements:
DRAFT g
0Bi07i96 14:02
Right to Vote on Taxes Act
Page 8
(�(11 Revenues derived from the fee or charge shall not exceed the
funds required to provide the property related service.
(2) Revenues derived from the fee or change shall not be used for any
purpose other than that for which the tee or charge was imposed.
(3) The amoum of a fee or charge imposed upon arty parcel or person
as an incident of property ownership shall not exceed the
proportional cost of the service attributable to the parcel.
(� (4) No fee or charge may be imposed for a service unless that service
is actually used by, or immediately available to, the owner of the
property in question. Fees or charges based on potential or future
use of a service are not permitted. Standby charges, whether
characterized as charges or assessments, shall be classified as
assessrnerrtsan4 shall not be without compliance with
Section f rs
\, I� (5) No fee or charge may be imposed for general govemmemel
'Lys services including, but not limited to, police, fire, ambulance or
. ., library servicesgnrhere the service is available to the Public at large
in substantially the same manner as it is to property owners.
Reliance by an agency on any parcel maP including ut not limited to,
an assessor's parcel map, may be considered a significant factor in
determining whether a fee or charge is imposed as incident of property ✓
ownership for purposes of this lrticle. In any legal action contesting the
validity of a fee or charge, the burden shall be on the agency to
cl demonstrate compliance with this likirtcle.
/\Q (c) Voter Approval for New or Increased Fees and Charges. Except for fees
or charges for sewer, water, and refuse collection services, no prope
related fee or charge shall be imposed or increased unless and urrol tic 4
fee or charge is submitted and approved by a maiority vote of the
property owners of the Property subject to the fee or charge or, at the
option of the agency, by a two-thirds vote of the electorate residing in
the affected area The election shall be conducted not less than 45 days
after the public h0wing. An agency may adopt procedures similar to
those for increases in assessments in the conduct of elections under this
�^y subdivision.
(d) Beginning July 1, 1997, all fees or charges shall comply with this
�SFcrion.
DRAFT 9
BBi04i96 14:03
Right to Vote on Taxes Act -
Page 9
' gSECMN5. LIBERAL CONSTRUCTION. The provisions of this," shall be liberally
construed to effectuate its purposes of limiting local government revenue and
enhancing taxpayer consent.
r
SECTION 6. SEVERABIUTY. If any provision of this�14ct, or part thereof, is for any
reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional, the remaining.sections shall nut be
affected, but shall remain in full farce and effect and to this end the provisions of this
)kct are severable.
DRAFT �d
.. County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County,California
P.O. Box 8127 a 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127
Telephone: (714)962-2411
DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Wednesday, September 18, 1996 at 5:30 p.m.
A meeting of the Executive Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13
and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Wednesday, September 18, 1996, at 5:30 p.m.,
at the Districts'Administrative Office.
(1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT:
Present: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel
John Sauvajot, Ford-Sauvajot Management
John J. Collins, Joint Chair Dana Smith, Executive Director, LAFCO
Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair
Pat McGuigan, Chair, District 1 and
OMTS Chair STAFF PRESENT:
George Brown, FAHR Chair
Victor Leipzig, Chair, District 11 Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager
Jan Debay, Chair, District 5 Blake P. Anderson, Asst. Geri. Mgr.
James Ferryman, Chair, District 6 Judith A. Wilson, Asst. Genl. Mgr,
John Gullixson, Chair, District 13 Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Thomas Saltarelli, Chair, District 14 David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Roger Stanton, County Supervisor Corina Chaudhry, Committee Secretary
William Steiner, County Supervisor
Don R. Griffin, Past Joint Chair
Norman Eckenrode, District 2
sent:
John Cox, Jr., Joint Chair
Sal Sapien, District 3
Barry Hammond, Chair, District 7
2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
l�
Minutes of the Executive Committee
Page 2
September 19, 1996
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no comments by any member of the public.
(4) APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of the June 19, 1996 Executive Committee meeting were approved as drafted.
(5) REPORTS OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR. GENERAL MANAGER, AND GENERAL
COUNSEL
(a) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
The Committee Chair did not report.
(b) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
The General Manager did not report.
(c) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
Tom Woodruff reported that the Sangennano trial had been postponed until February
due to request of Plaintiffs Counsel. Tom also reported that the good news was that
four of the named defendants had been dismissed along with causes of action for
breach of action and causes of action for deformation.
(6) Discussion of LAFCO Application Re: Consolidation
Don gave a brief overview of the Government Practices Oversight Committee (GPOC)
report. He said that the report had been released in final form and that the group was
comprised of 25 members which was an all volunteer citizen group.
Subsequent to the issuance of this report, the County CEO office has developed a separate
but related document entitled "External Restructuring Policy Report." Don said that he would
be providing more information in the Board Letter.
Item (1)
Presentation by Judy Wilson
Judy Wilson introduced Dana Smith and John Sauvajot. Judy Wilson reported that this is the
fourth time in the past nine months that the issue of Consolidation has appeared on the
Minutes of the Executive Committee
Page 3
September 19, 1996
Executive Committee agenda for discussion and that she would not be presenting detailed
background information. Rather, the purpose of this meeting was to review work products
required for a LAFCO application and to make a formal recommendation for the September
Joint Boards' meeting.
Judy said the items that were going to be reviewed were the LAFCO Justification Proposal,
which is the information that will be sent to interested members of the general public
explaining our application, the resolution of application which would be before each individual
district for action paying particular attention to Exhibit C, (the proposed Terms and
Conditions) and Exhibit D, (A Plan of Services for the Consolidation of the Districts). Judy
mentioned that these draft work products had been shared with LAFCO staff to be sure that
they met their requirements.
Before proceeding with the review and discussion, Judy first mentioned that LAFCO has the
authority to amend the proposed Terms and Conditions. It was her understanding that
LAFCO's Counsel had looked at the issue whether LAFCO has the authority to change the
Districts' governance option and require 4730.1 rather than 4730. The answer was that they
did. It was also noted the Districts can withdraw its application subsequent to the public
hearing before Certification of Completion if LAFCO places terms and conditions on the
application that are unacceptable to the Districts. In the event that the Districts withdraws its
application, LAFCO also has the authority to initiate a consolidation of the Districts on its
own.
Presentation by Dana Smith
Dana Smith began her presentation by commenting on how LAFCO was perceived state-
wide, and mentioned that the Pringle Bill was not an isolated occurrence but rather was
beginning to be the north. Ms. Smith reported that LAFCO was comprised of representatives
of citizens, special districts, the County and the public member sector. Ms. Smith also
commented on how decisions being made at the local level were being challenged because
of the perception of too many layers of government. Ms. Smith also commented on the trend
of legislature hying to resolve more local issues by legislative solutions.
Dana Smith mentioned that the perception of people looking at the Sanitation Districts, which
have already functionally consolidated at an operation and administrative level, is that it
would not be to difficult to consolidate. A question was asked that if the Districts failed to
consolidate, would LAFCO initiate consolidation. The answer was that certainly they had
that option and they had all the tools to proceed as the Districts had completed its study. On
the issue of terms and conditions, Ms. Smith stated that it was preferable that those options
be determined by the Districts and not LAFCO, but that it could fall to LAFCO in the event of
controversial issues.
Dana Smith mentioned that in order to assist the cities in getting this information, they would
have a 30 day period in which they would be required to provide a summary of the
application and a notice of application and then a request for comment. She mentioned that
Minutes of the Executive Committee
Page 4
September 19, 1996
she could coordinate with Districts staff and this would help to compress the time frame.
Ms. Smith was asked if a particular city did not want to proceed with the Consolidation
process, did that city have any legal recourse. Ms. Smith stated that the cities would have
no legal protest and couldn't force an action either way; however, LAFCO had a
responsibility to review all comments. Ms. Smith also mentioned that as an alternative, the
commission had the authority to amend boundaries and include and exclude agencies.
Ms. Smith mentioned that the Districts should be looking at how to better structure the
Districts in the future, and comparing how we can solve some of the inequities now and 20
years down the road.
General Discussion by Committee Members
John Gullixson mentioned that there would be a letter going out to the Districts inviting them
to do a presentation to their council regarding Consolidation. He commented that he would
like their council to be better informed of the Consolidation process before he votes on this
issue.
Most members were in favor of soliciting comments from their respective cities, however, it
was noted that a vote would be taken at the September Board meeting and this would not
allow much time for consultation with their respective cities.
A concern for some of the Committee members, was that the Consolidation would initiate
rate increases. It was noted that rate increases would not occur because of Consolidation.
Judy Wilson mentioned that each District would have to vote on the Resolution of Application
to LAFCO.
John Collins asked about the rate structure, the reserves built up and the liability of debt
account, Bonds or COPs and how those issues would be handled, and who would be
handling these. The reply was that the improvement zones would take care of these issues
in that it was comprised of two parts, one part to deal with the portion of rates and the
second part to deal with the continuation of structure that is currently in place for debt service
and that there would not be a change. Judy Wilson also mentioned that there would be one
governing body handling these issues.
Some of the Committee members commented that they did not feel that there was any
compelling reason to move towards Consolidation, and that the Districts had bigger issues to
deal with and that time and money should not be spent on this.
The Committee discussed the Justification Proposal and suggested: modifying to the
discussion on revenue, noting bond proceeds; underscoring the point that Consolidation will
not result in an increase in user fees; and deleting the discussion on possible savings on
financings. Judy Wilson indicated that she would amend the Justification proposal
( Minutes of the Executive Committee
Page 5
September 19, 1996
accordingly prior to submission to the September Joint Boards meeting.
After much discussion, Roger Stanton commented that he objected to the way that John
Collins was conducting the meeting and that the board had already voted on this and he
couldn't understand why they were discussing again at this committee. Mr. Stanton said that
we should be asking ourselves whether we would have designed the Districts this way from
the beginning if we had to do this all over again.
John Collins accepted the criticism and replied that this meeting was just a study session
and by a show of hands we would vote on the Consolidation and the Method of
Consolidation and that we would be taking this formally to the September Board.
By show of hands, the Committee members voted 5 to 6 with 1 abstention on the issue of
Consolidation and split 5 to 5 with 2 abstentions on the issue of proceeding under 4730 or
4730.1.
The question was asked whether the resolution could be modified. Tom Woodruff
commented that it could be modified like any other resolution before the Boards with an
amendment to the resolution.
Item (2)
Discussion of the Margate Construction, Inc Protest
The committee asked whether the Directors were going to be allowed to assemble in
Executive Session to talk about the potential liability issues before a decision is made.
Tom Woodruff commented that at this point this might be a possibility, however, there is no
mention of litigation from either party and that at this point it is simply determining whether
the project is different than from the first time, and that the Board would be determining this.
This is a no action item. Will be going to the Board for action.
(7) CLOSED SESSION
There was no closed session.
(8) OTHER BUSINESS
There was no other business discussion.
(9) MATTERS TO BE REPORTED ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING
There were none.
Minutes of the Executive Committee 0
Page 6
September 19, 1996
(10) MATTERS ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT.
There were none.
(11) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS
The next meeting of the Executive Committee will be at the call of the Chair.
(12) ADJOURNMENT
The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:35 p.m.
Submitted by:
Corina Chaudhry, Sec ery
J\1YPppCIfMiF)fELBRSEPT Im MII
' AGENDA
E � ;
t ' f� ITEM
TRANSMITTAL
f Jf
� i ik I q 6F52E�g^1
i1 � Y
MEETING DATE dOMM 18,tirS. "`'', DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION (Initials of Originator)
OMTS:
PDC:
FAHR: + ' All 2150, Judy Wilson, ext.2005
EXEC: 9/18/96 r #
STEER ;
STEER: e�,. Division No.,Name,and Extension
JT.BDS:9125/96
AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
Agenda Wording:
LAFCO APPLICATION FOR THE CONSOLIDATION OF THE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY (All Districts): The Executive Committee forwarded the LAFCO application package and
implementing resolutions to the Joint Boards for action. The Executive Committee voted 5-6-1 on the issue of
Consolidation and split 5 to 5 with 2 abstentions on the issue of proceeding under 4730 or 4730.1
Recommended Action(s):
1) Forward to the Joint Boards the Resolution of application for Consolidation of the County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County for Districts' consideraton.
CEQA REVIEW: Project Is Exempt: Not Applicable at this time DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM:
Date Notice of Exemption Filed:
Negative Declaration Approved on June 28, 1998
Final EIR Approved on_and Notice of Determination glad on_
BUDGET INFORMATION CURRENTYEAR CURRENT YEAR- YEAR-TO-DATE REVISED BUDGET
TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.: $30,000 BUDGET AMOUNT TO-DATE allDGETBALANCE TOTAL
SOURCE: JO EXPENDITURES (Tdsi 11 p 1awr Trnmm)
Schedule/Line Item: $30.000 $0 $30,000 $30.000
AMOUNT OF TRANSFER:
Schedule/Line Item:
AITIPROJECT COST INFORMATION ORIGINAL BID, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED PROJECT
PO,CONTRACT FUNDS PREV. REQUESTED THIS AMOUNT
AMOUNT APPROVED AIT
NA NA $15,000.00 $15,000.00
WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? YES
If YES,stale number. -Permanent Limited Tenn If YES,explain In ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section
CONCURRENCES: ATTACHMENTS TO AGENDA (List)
To Committee: 1. Staff Report
2. Draft LAFCO Application Package
Signature Date
Division Manager(Or Designee)
Signature Date To A. Bds.. 1. Staff Report
Department Head (Or Designee) l; 2. Draft LAFCO Application Package
Ii' Lei Ati _Ill Ql
Sig to Date
Assistant General Manager(Or Designee)
OMTS COMM. PDC COMM. FAHR COMM. JOINT BOARDS
Meeting Date:
Approved:
'Amended:.
Forwarded to*
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION(Background and/or summary)
See Attachment 1.
ca
c. Department Head
AGM-Administration
AGM-Operations
General Manager
A:1918AITWPD Page 2 of
Revision: 8I1196
ATTACHMENT
Staff Report
LAFCO Application for the Consolidation
of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County are proposing to consolidate the existing
nine districts into one sanitation district The goal is to simplify the governmental structure,
reduce the size of the Board, ease administrative processes, stream-line decision making
procedures and consolidate some accounting and auditing functions. The new district is
proposed to be formed under California Health and Safety Code Section 4730, and would
be governed by a 24 member board representing local cities and sanitary districts. The
new district would be called the Consolidated Sanitation District of Orange County.
Background
At the May 15, 1996 Executive Committee meeting, staff was directed to prepare a
complete analysis of governance options for consideration, in order that the Committee and
the Joint Boards could comprehensively discuss the proposed consolidation and the
alternatives for formation.
In response to this, staff presented a final recommendation on governance options for
consolidation of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County(CSDOC)at the June 26,
1996 Joint Boards meeting. Staff recommended formation of the consolidated District
under California Health & Safety Code Section 4730.1, which would include IRWD in the
new Board's membership. In the ensuing discussion, two issues were considered at
length: the merits of consolidation and the most appropriate code section to use to form
a consolidated District.
Consolidation
After lengthy discussion among the Directors, a vote by district was taken whether to
consolidate or not. While the majority of the districts voted to support consolidation, the
opinion was not unanimous. District 6 voted in opposition to consolidation. The District 14
vote resulted in a tie and, although District 2 ended up supporting consolidation, their initial
motion was to oppose the concept.
Governance
Further discussion followed regarding the most appropriate section of the California Health
& Safety Code to use as the basis of consolidation. Under Health and Safety Code
Section 4730, the governing body of the District would be made up of one representative
for every existing member city, sanitary district and unincorporated portion of the county
within the Districts' service area and now represented on one or more of the existing nine
Districts. Board membership would decrease from 29 to 24 with the loss of double
representation for the cities of Huntington Beach, Newport Beach, Yorba Linda and the
County of Orange and removal of Irvine Ranch Water District as an eligible water district
Staff Report: LAFCO Consolidation Application
Executive Committee Meeting
Page 2
member agency. Section 4730 does not provide for water district membership on the
governing board.
Utilizing Section 4730.1, on the other hand, would produce a larger governing body for the
newly consolidated District. While no city nor the County would be entitled to two directors,
water districts that are engaged in wastewater service within the District's service area
would be included, namely: Irvine Ranch, Los Alamitos and Yorba Linda Water Districts.
Additionally, the cities of Costa Mesa, Garden Grove and Westminster would have
membership, together with the Costa Mesa Sanitary District, Garden Grove Sanitary
District and Midway City Sanitary District notwithstanding that these three cities do not
provide any wastewater service. Thus, the total Board membership would be 30.
Following significant debate, the Districts Joint Boards of Directors voted to recommend
formation of the consolidated District under Section 4730, thus reducing the governing
board by five members to 24. This alternative works to reduce the public's perception of
expanded governance and eliminates the double representation of jurisdictions.
Furthermore, water reclamation and conservation projects can still be pursued through
cooperative agreements with other agencies with common missions.
Under 4730, the 24-member board would be made up of representatives from the following
jurisdictions:
• County (1) -County of Orange Unincorporated Area
• Cities (20)
Anaheim Irvine Tustin
Brea La Habra Santa Ana
Buena Park La Palma Seal Beach
Cypress Los Alamitos Stanton
Fountain Valley Newport Beach Villa Park
Fullerton Orange Yorba Linda
Huntington Beach Placentia
• Sanitary Districts (3)
Costa Mesa Garden Grove Midway City
Staff Report: LAFCO Consolidation Application
Executive Committee Meeting
Page 3
Consolidation of CSDOC under either scenario will result in the Chairman of the
consolidated District Board receiving less compensation for participation in monthly
meetings. Although Board Directors would continue to receive the same$100 per meeting
or day of service, for a maximum of six meetings per month, the Chairman's compensation
would be significantly reduced. The Chairman currently receives a maximum of$1400 per
month - $900 for the Joint Boards meeting and then $100 per any other meeting or day of
service for a maximum of five additional meetings per month. Following consolidation of
the Districts,the Chairman would be limited to a total of$600 per month, representing $100
per meeting or day of service for a maximum of six meetings or days per month.
LAFCO Application
The final action of the June 26, 1996 Joint Board meeting was to direct staff to prepare
Terms and Conditions and a draft LAFCO application pursuant to Section 4730 for review
at the regularly scheduled Joint Boards meeting in September 1996.
This agenda item transmits the draft LAFCO application for the consolidation of the
Districts. The application consists of the following documents:
• Resolutions of Application: Resolutions submitted to LAFCO to initiate the
review of the consolidation proposal.
• Justification Proposal: A summary document stating the reasons for
formation of the consolidated District and providing comprehensive
background information.
• Plan of Service: A detailed report describing the functions and finances of
the consolidated District during its first three years of operation.
• Terms and Conditions: A listing of the recommended terms and conditions
that will provide the mechanism by which the ownership and operation of the
current CSDOC will be transferred to the consolidated District. The terms
and conditions are guided by Government Code Section 56844.
• Implementation Guidelines: A document detailing the basic steps
necessary to secure implementation of the District formation.
• Maps and Exhibits: Maps depicting the new District's territory and the
accompanying exhibits.
Budget for IAFCO Review
LAFCO charges a standard filing fee of$3,900.00 for each application that is submitted.
Staff Report, LAFCO Consolidation Application ATTACHMENT 1
Executive Committee Meeting
Page 4
This fee covers the time and material costs of up to 80 hours of staff review and
processing. Staff review in excess of 80 hours, is charged on an hourly basis as are any
legal costs for review of the application by LAFCO counsel. As a basis for setting a
budget, CSDOC staff asked LAFCO staff to propose a budget for additional review (both
staff review in excess of 80 hours and legal review). LAFCO indicated that is difficult to
project the amount of additional review be needed. CSDOC staff has offered any
assistance possible and will be providing all application materials on disk for LAFCO staffs
use. LAFCO estimates that a budget of an $5,000.00 in addition to the filing fee would be
reasonable. This is with the understanding that, if the project proves to be controversial
in nature and time intensive, additional funds may be required. All costs are charged and
tracked on an hourly basis. In addition to these charges there is a CEOA filling fee of
$38.00 and a State Board fee of$750.00.
Bond Counsel Opinion
The Districts' existing Certificates of Participation (COP) permit consolidation of the
districts. The COPs, however, include a covenant that requires a bond counsel opinion
stating that the proposed consolidation will not effect their tax-exempt status. Staff
anticipates that bond counsel review will cost approximately $5,000.00 and, pending the
Joint Boards submittal of the consolidation application to LAFCO, staff will pursue securing
an opinion.
This brings the initial project budget to$14,688.00, Staff is requesting an initial allocation
of $15,000.00 to cover the project review phase of this project. There is $30,000.00
included in the approved FY 1996/97 budget for this project
Conclusion
The application is presented for the Executive Committee's review, approval and
recommendation to the Boards to submit the LAFCO application for the consolidation of
the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County.
r
Revised:9/18/96
LAFCO Justification Proposal
Consolidation of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Introduction
The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County are proposing to consolidate the existing
nine districts into one sanitation district. The goal is to simplify the governmental structure,
reduce the size of the Board, ease administrative processes, streamline decision-making
procedures and consolidate some accounting and auditing functions. The new consolidated
district is proposed to be formed under California Health and Safety Code 4730, and would
be governed by a 24 member board representing local cities and sanitary districts. The new
district would be called the Consolidated Sanitation District of Orange County.
What are the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County and what do they do?
The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (Districts) is a publicly owned wastewater
treatment agency that provides sewage collection, treatment and disposal services for
approximately 2.24 million people in central and northwest Orange County. The Districts
operate and maintain the third largest facilities of their kind west of the Mississippi River.
During 1994/95, an average daily sewage influent flow of 244 million gallons per day (MGD)
was treated and 510 wet tons per day of residual solids (biosolids) were produced. The
Districts' service area encompasses a 470 square-mile area of Orange County that includes
23 of the County's 31 cities. The Districts' revenues are derived from service and connection
fees, property tax revenues, investment interest and borrowing.
The Districts is actually nine individual districts that exist independently of each other but
participate together in a joint operating agreement for the operation and administration of joint
facilities. The individual districts are co-participants in an agreement which was drafted in
1958 and revised in 1985 that provides for the joint construction, ownership and operation of
the treatment plants, trunk sewers, pumping stations and two modem wastewater treatment
plants.
The Districts process wastewater from the collection systems of the various cities, water
districts and local sewer agencies. They do not deal directly with individual customers except
for portions of District No. 7 which are located primarily in unincorporated territory of the
County.
What type of facilities do the Districts own and operate?
The nine member districts, acting as the Joint Facilities, own about 650 miles of major trunk
CSDOC 0 V.O. Box 8127 0 Fountain Valley.CA 92728.8127 0 (714)962-2411
e
Revised:9118196
sewers, 22 pumping stations and two major treatment plants with disposal facilities to safely
discharge the treated effluent though an ocean outfall into deep ocean waters.
Plant 1
Reclamation Plant No. 1 is located in Fountain Valley about four miles from the coast
adjacent to the Santa Ana River at the 405 Freeway. It has a current operational
primary treatment capacity, including standby, of 108 MGD, and secondary treatment
capacity of 66 MGD.
Plant 2
Treatment Plant No. 2 is located 1,500 feet from the mouth of the Santa Ana River on
Brookhurst Street in Huntington Beach. It has a primary treatment capacity, including
standby, of 286 MGD. Plant No. 2 provides advanced primary treatment to all of the
wastewater that enters the plant and secondary treatment to up to 75 MGD of the total
flow.
How are the Districts funded and how are the costs allocated?
The Districts have a variety of revenue sources available for operating and capital expenses.
The major revenue sources are as follows:
• Property Taxes
• Connection Fees
• User Fees
• Industrial Waste User Fees
• Interest Earnings
• Bond Proceeds
These five sources have generally accounted for more than 90 percent of the total revenue
to the Districts. The importance of each revenue source varies from District to District. The
Districts bond for long-tens capital improvements debt service is paid through property taxes
and reserves.
Each district is supported by its own budget. Collectively, the Districts utilize joint operating,
working capital and capital outlay revolving accounts to pay joint operating and construction
costs. These costs are subsequently allocated to the Districts based on gallons of sewage
flow. The cost of new plant construction and other necessary facilities is similarly allocated
to each District. The Districts also rely on a joint staff for administration, operations and
maintenance.
Who governs the current Districts?
The Districts consist of nine independent special districts. Each district has its own board of
directors, made up of mayors and members of city councils, directors of independent special
Page 2
V
Revised:9M9M9
districts and members of the County Board of Supervisors representing jurisdictions within that
District. There are currently 29 directors.
An individual may serve on more than one district board if parts of his/her agency lie within
more than one District. Each board is responsible for matters related to its district, however,
the boards meet as a joint board on matters of shared interest and responsibility, including the
Joint Facilities. An individual district's responsibilities cannot be decided by the Joint Board,
but only by the individual district's board.
Why is a change being considered?
Today there is growing public concern over the number of special districts serving the needs
of California residents. This concern stems from the desire to improve customer service while
decreasing duplicative layers of governmental bureaucracy. A change in the Districts structure
is being proposed in light of the opportunities that consolidation is believed to offer. The goal
of this proposed consolidation is to simplify governance structures, reduce the size of the
board,ease administrative processes, streamline decision-making procedures and consolidate
some accounting and auditing functions.
What alternatives were considered?
Basically, two alternatives were considered - to consolidate or to remain a joint operation of
nine individual districts. Since its inception in 1947, the Joint Boards of Directors has reviewed
the concept of consolidation several times. The 1981-82 Grand Jury issued a report
recommending that the Boards consolidate the then seven Sanitation Districts into one district
with Board membership based on a smaller group of elected representatives. In 1983 the
Joint Boards determined that the Districts' operations were functionally consolidated under the
Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement, and no significant overall benefit
would accrue by reorganizing into a single district. However, a subsequent consolidation effort
began in January 1995 with staff being directed to further research the issue. The results of
this research have led to the current recommendation to form a consolidated district.
Consolidation would complete the process of providing the existing districts joint operations
with a more efficient governance and decision-making structure.
Based on the recommendation to create a consolidated District, two formation alternatives
were considered. The new District could be formed under either Section 4730 or Section
4730.1 of the California Health and Safety Code. These sections, their implications on
formation, as well as the final recommendations, are discussed in greater detail later in this
paper.
What are the benefits of creating a new district?
Forming a consolidated District can be seen as the final step in what the existing Districts have
been working toward in the operation and administration of the Joint Facilities. While the
current Districts have acted largely in a consolidated manner, they have not realized the full
benefits of functioning as one consolidated agency. It is believed that the proposed
Page 3
Revised:9119/99
consolidation will result in more direct and equitable governance of the wastewater system,
more effective and efficient operations and administration of the treatment facilities, better use
of existing resources, more opportunities for regional benefit and some modest administrative
and financial savings.
More Direct and Equitable Governance
Currently, the nine districts are represented by nine separate and individual Boards of
Directors. These nine autonomous Boards of Directors vote independently on district issues
and collectively on joint works matters. While this structure ensures local governance and
representation at the district level, it can become skewed and inequitable at the Joint Boards
level. In several cases a city is represented on more than one of the individual district boards
because city boundaries are not necessarily contiguous with district boundaries. When a Joint
Works vote is taken, that city is entitled to cast a vote on each of the districts boards where
it is a member. The result is that, at the Joint Boards level, jurisdictions which fall into more
than one district have several votes whereas other jurisdictions, regardless of size, may only
have a single voice.
In addition to this inequity in representation, for a matter to be approved at a Joint Works level
a majority of the individual districts boards must approve it. For example, five of the nine
district boards must approve a project for it to go forward. This simple majority of boards,
however, does not always reflect the tally of the individual board members voting. Due to the
existence of double representation, a project may be approved by a majority of the Joint
Boards, but if the vote were to be tallied based on a direct count of board members, that same
project could have failed.
Consolidation of the individual districts would result in a wastewater treatment system
governed in a direct and unified manner. Only one consolidated board would exist and that
board would be comprised of members who had one vote for their local constituencies. Board
membership is discussed later in this paper.
More Effective and Efficient Operations and Administration
With the existence of the nine individual districts voting on joint projects, there is an inherent
potential for disagreement on the operation or administration of those facilities. While the
history of the Districts reflects much consensus building and accord, there is the possibility that
any group of districts could disagree on the most prudent course of current or future operation
of the Joint Facilities. For example, a significant opportunity to reduce the need for expanded
capacity at the plants may be possible by doing some local improvements in the older
collection systems that have in-flow problems. Will one District willingly agree to spend
millions of dollars to correct its local problems, in order to save twice that amount for the other
eight Districts? As the local infrastructure ages, these issues will become problematic.
The mere potential for this type of disagreement decreases, to some extent, the ultimate
efficiency or effectiveness of an organization. Whenever an agency is forced to consider the
Page 4
v
Revised:9119199
independent views of nine voting boards, more time and energy must be spent on the
analysis, development and implementation of a project.
Consolidation of the existing districts into one single District would eliminate the potential for
the districts to be at cross purposes. The board would act as one entity, advancing the goals
and objectives of the collective constituency. Similarly, efficiency and some level of increased
effectiveness would be realized from staff serving that one single purpose, instead of directing
attention to nine individual districts.
Better Use of Existing Resources
Although the Districts have functioned in a consolidated manner for numerous years,there are
still opportunities for a consolidated agency to make better use of existing resources. By
shifting the Districts' focus from the separateness of the individual agencies, the new
consolidated District would be able to expend that energy evaluating new opportunities for the
agency to pursue. The time and effort that would be saved on the administration of the
individual districts could be spent focusing the consolidated District on larger regional issues
that could produce revenue generating, cost savings or environmental benefits to the District.
More Opportunities for Regional Benefit
A consolidated District would be better positioned to consider and act on regional issues. The
new District would represent 23 of the County's 31 cities with 90 percent of the county wide
wastewater flow. A consolidated District could more effectively utilize its resources and
membership to address larger regional issues such as the potential for a large scale
reclamation project or alternative, lower-cost operating strategies. The size and singular
consensus demonstrated by the consolidated District would facilitate regional development
and coordination of wastewater related projects.
Administrative and Financial Savings
Administrative benefits would occur from the consolidation of some accounting and auditing
procedures. While these benefits would not represent significant cost savings to the District,
the benefit would be realized in a more streamlined and effective way of doing business.
What would the new District do?
The new District would fulfill the same mission with which the current Districts (both
independently and acting as a Joint Board) are currently charged. Since the formation in
1948, the Joint Boards have been acting collectively, and functionally serving as a
consolidated Board while maintaining independent District boundaries. The consolidation of
the nine districts into one agency would simply clarify and expedite the new Districts' ability
to meet its primary goal; to protect public heath and environment through excellence in
wastewater systems.
The responsibilities, obligations and future facility plans of the newly consolidated district
would not change as a result of the consolidation itself. It is possible, however, that the
Page 5
1�
Revised:9/16/96
consolidated District would find itself in a position to better accommodate new or changing
roles in wastewater management. By streamlining the Districts' mission and decreasing the
administrative procedures, the new District may be better positioned to pursue new ventures
that advance today's wastewater treatment or make more use of its existing resources.
What would be the statutory authority of the new district and who would govern it?
The new District would be formed under the California Health and Safety Code Section 4730.
There was considerable discussion among staff and among Directors regarding the most
appropriate section of the principal act(County Sanitation District Act)to use for formation and
to determine governance. Section 4730.1 was also identified, studied and considered as a
potential alternative.
Under Health and Safety Code Section 4730, the governing body of the consolidated District
would be made up of one representative for every existing member city, sanitary district and
unincorporated portion of the county within the Districts' service area and now represented on
one or more of the existing nine Districts. Board membership would decrease from 29 to 24
with the loss of double representation for the cities of Huntington Beach, Newport Beach and
Yorba Linda and the County of Orange and removal of the Irvine Ranch Water District as an
eligible water district member agency.
Utilizing Section 4730.1, on the other hand, would produce a larger governing body for the
newly consolidated District. While no city nor the County would be entitled to two directors,
water districts that are engaged in wastewater service within the District's service area would
be included, namely: Irvine Ranch, Los Alamitos and Yorba Linda Water Districts.
Additionally, the cities of Costa Mesa, Garden Grove and Westminster would have
membership,together with the Costa Mesa Sanitary District, Garden Grove Sanitary District
and Midway City Sanitary District notwithstanding that these three cities do not provide any
wastewater service. Thus, the total Board membership would be 30.
LAFCO has recently acted to create a subsidiary district in Garden Grove, which will result in
the Garden Grove Sanitary District being dissolved and replaced on the consolidated
sanitation district board by the City of Garden Grove.
Initially, staffs recommendation was to form the consolidated District under Section 4730.1 in
an effort to be inclusive. By including the water districts, future efforts with regard to water
reclamation and conservation would be facilitated. The larger Board was also preferred
because it did not exclude current system participants. Even though the number of Directors
would increase, it was felt that the consolidation of the nine districts into one would still
produce the streamlined results desired, regardless of a slight increase in board membership.
Following significant consideration, however, the Districts Joint Boards of Directors voted to
recommend formation of the consolidated District under Section 4730, thus reducing the
governing board by five members. This alternative would work to reduce the public's
Page 6
Peimd:W19M6
perception of expanded governance and it would eliminate any double representation of
jurisdictions. Furthermore, water reclamation and conservation projects could still be pursued
through cooperative agreements with other agencies with common missions.
Based on the Board's direction, the proposed governing Board formed under Section 4730
would include the following agencies:
• County (1) -County of Orange Unincorporated Area
• Cities (20)
Anaheim Irvine Tustin
Brea La Habra Santa Ana
Buena Park La Palma Seal Beach
Cypress Los Alamitos Stanton
Fountain Valley Newport Beach Villa Park
Fullerton Orange Yorba Linda
Huntington Beach Placentia
• Sanitary Districts (3)
Costa Mesa Garden Grove Midway City
Formation under4730 is also subject to the creation of the subsidiary district in Garden Grove
as described previously in this section. The result however, would not change the total
number of board membership. The only impact would be the Garden Grove Sanitary District
being removed from the board and replaced by the City of Garden Grove.
Are there benefits to the customers of the system?
Yes, there are several benefits to the Districts' customers. The customers will benefit from a
more direct governance structure, where their local representative will have a direct voting
impact on the matters before the board for consideration. There no longer will be the
possibility that, due to double representation or a split vote amongst the nine districts boards,
decisions could be unduly influenced by a handful of officials casting multiple votes.
The customers will also benefit from an improvement in service delivery. While it is not likely
to be a benefit that the average resident recognizes on a daily basis, there will be an increase
in overall efficiencies as a result of streamlining the nine agencies into one consolidated
organization. While service delivery may not ostensibly change, the ability of the organization
to use its resources more effectively will likely present opportunities of the District to enter into
Page 7
R"Ised;9118196
new ventures that are central to the District's mission while working-smarter with the existing
core workforce.
Finally, the customer will benefit from the recognition that government has responded to the
voice of the electorate and is working diligently to reduce the number of government units.
This consolidation is evidence of local government responding to citizens concerns and
working to make an already efficient and effective operation more responsive to the public's
needs. Although the Districts have historically functioned in a consolidated manner, it is this
current effort that will formally adopt the organizational changes and make them the foundation
for the agency's development in years to come.
Will there be a rate increase because of the consolidation?
No, there will not be a rate increase as a result of the consolidation. The consolidation will
provide the new District the opportunity to evaluate administration and operations of the
wastewater facilities and recognize increased efficiencies wherever possible. There may be
modest cost savings recognized from merging the nine individual agencies into one
streamlined organization.
To ensure that there are no rate impacts to the customers as a direct result of consolidation,
revenue zones are proposed to be established within the consolidated District. These zones
would provide the administrative mechanism for the existing debt of the different geographic
areas to be kept separate and the rate schedule to remain unchanged. In future years, a
consolidated board may look toward equalized rate structure where the wastewater system's
infrastructure is supported by a uniform District-wide user fee. That, however, is not proposed
at this time and is not part of the consolidation application.
What are the environmental impacts?
Because the Districts have been functioning in a consolidated manner for years, no negative
environmental impacts are anticipated. The consolidated District would have an identical
territory as the existing Districts, and the current permits guiding the Districts operations would
remain in place, monitoring the actions of the consolidated District.
One likely benefit, however, is that the consolidation may provide the consolidated District with
the opportunity to strive for even more successes with regard to environmental sensitivity and
stewardship. Since the individual districts would now be governed by one regional body, local
concerns would be combined with regional awareness, potentially increasing the level and
effectiveness of the District's proactive environmental compliance.
The existing Districts have an outstanding record of environmental stewardship in Orange
County and, as part of the agency's mission, strives for excellence in wastewater treatment.
Any resulting benefit from the consolidation of the Districts would complement this record of
environmental awareness and success.
Page 8
r
Revised:BHBIBB
When would the Districts consolidate?
The consolidation of the Districts could happen any time after the IAFCO approval process
has been completed. It is proposed, however, that consolidation be implemented July 1, 1997
to be consistent with the start of the new fiscal year. Because much of the impact of the
consolidation will be on administrative matters, this fiscal year end transition, would facilitate
the necessary changes from the Districts' current accounting and administrative procedures.
The Districts are in the process of selecting and implementing a new Financial Information
System; the July 1, 1997, consolidation date would complement the intent to have the new
General Ledger system in place at that time.
Where can I get more Information about this proposal?
The proposed consolidation of the Districts is discussed in further detail in the County
Sanitation Districts of Orance County Final Consolidation Reoort prepared by Ford Sauvajot
Management Group, Inc. This report is on file with the Districts and is available for review.
It is also included in the Districts' application to LAFCO for consolidation.
Page 9
P
i
RESOLUTION NO.
INITIATING PROPOSAL TO CONSOLIDATE DISTRICTS
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. _ APPLYING
TO THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
FOR CONSOLIDATION OF COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF
ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA, PURSUANT TO THE
PROVISIONS OF CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTIONS 56000, ET SE( .
WHEREAS, the County Sanitation Districts were originally organized in 1954
as separate districts providing sewer services, generally following the drainage
patterns of Orange County; and
WHEREAS, Orange County's sewer system is now well-established and the
current main focus of the nine districts is on joint projects and the attendant
regulatory issues; and
WHEREAS, over the years, the maintenance of the nine districts as separate
entities has contributed to certain administrative and financial burdens; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Part 3 of Division 3 of Title 5 of the Government
Code, known as the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985
("the Act"), certain local agencies may submit a request to the Local Agency
Formation Commission for a change of organization or a reorganization; and
WOODRUFF,SPR LM&SMART
Sc,m ,3, 1996
1
v
WHEREAS, County Sanitation District No. _ is a local agency authorized
to make such a proposal; and
WHEREAS, "consolidation" is one type of change of organization or
reorganization permitted by the Act, defined as the uniting or joining of two or more
districts, formed pursuant to the same principal act, into a single new successor
district; and
WHEREAS, notice of intent to adopt this resolution of application has not been
given to each interested and each subject agency; and
WHEREAS, the territory proposed to be consolidated is inhabited; and
WHEREAS, in the interest of streamlining administration and board
procedures, maintaining financial and other records, and reducing costs, it has been
determined by the districts that the proposed consolidation will effect substantial
administrative benefits and financial savings, both individually and collectively.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No.
1 of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1: This proposal for a change of organization is made pursuant to
Part 3 of the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985.
Section 2: The change of organization proposed herein is the consolidation
of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 into a single County
Sanitation District.
1ll000 n WOODRUFF,SPRADLW&SMART
SCOL 1 -2- Sepwm r S, 1996
Section 3: The boundaries of the affected nine districts are as depicted in
Exhibit "A", attached. The boundaries of the proposed consolidated district are as
depicted in Exhibit "B", attached.
Section 4: Terms and conditions of the proposed consolidation regarding
consolidation of assets and financial obligations are set forth on Exhibit "C",
attached.
Section 5: The number and method of selection of members of the
governing board shall be as provided in California Government Code section 4730.
Section 6: The following person is to be furnished with copies of the report
by the executive officer and to be given mailed notice of the hearing on the proposal:
Donald F. McIntyre
General Manager
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California
10844 Ellis Avenue
Post Office Box 8127
Fountain Valley, CA 92708-7018
Section 7: This proposal is to be considered a formal request that
proceedings for consolidation be taken pursuant to part 3 of the Cortese-Knox Local
Government Reorganization Act of 1985.
Section 8: A plan for providing services within the affected territory is
attached as Exhibit "D".
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held
1996.
2000 32 W DRUFF,SPR LW&SMART
3 1_I -3- Scpmm er 3, 1996
EXHIBIT "A"
MAP OF CURRENT BOUNDARIES OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13, AND 14
2000-WO]2 Wp DAUFP,SPRADL &SMART
]A011 1 -4- ScPIsmM�3, 1996
LOS ANGELES COUNTY
Oq�9
LA HABRA ry GF,
u.wnno Ge `Ti 9��b
B EA
Y ON uw YORBA 7$ 9
I LACENTIA LINDA
?'� I 2a.�kmclI ..e
yy` LApUENA
,LaF' PALM
Gy ANAHEIM VILLA O
•.. CYPRE S I 9 1PARK
"LOS ROS a STANTON y RAN E
§J GARDEN
GRO
S STMIhlSTFnm.mnMn
B O Tu
11 F sAN7 14
8 )UNTA110
, new ALLEY I 8
HU IN N
PACIFICOCEAN MBA IRVINE
O`
5 s
NEWPORT
BEACH IIt^II^
u
N
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
SRVM-CLR.CDR
CSDOC 1/95
EXHIBIT "B"
MAP OF PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF CONSOLIDATED DISTRICT
200MM32 WOODRUFF,SPRADLIN&SMART
3 1 1 -5- SeP��er 3, 1996
LOS ANGELES COUNTY ^
LA HAW BRA [9dWryBe'9Y
15 9
B EA 3 OLH�
L ON � .w
YORBA y
�.. LACENTIA LINDA
4 sz CO
0y LA `LIE A 1
PALM p PA K
ANAHEIM y a
w.ioI CYPRESS I VILLA O
LOS STANTON 1p PARK
LAMITOS PI I RANdE
` s
9 GARDEN
GRID
I�lS .ws+w.w�Aw I
S
B y
SANT'
ANA
P FDUNTA
.✓u.� VALLEY
HU IN N
PACIFIC A' COST
OCEAN MESA IRVINE
9
NEWPORT
BEACH
N
SRVM-CLR.CDR
CSDOC 1195
EXHIBIT "C"
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF PROPOSED CONSOLIDATION
200 32 WOODRUFF,SPRADLW&SMART
SW21 1 -6- S p¢mb.r 1, 1996
LAFCO Application Terms 8r Conditions
Consolidation of County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
1. The nine separate districts known jointly as the County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County (CSDOC) shall be consolidated into one single County
Sanitation district pursuant to the County Sanitation District Act (California
Health and Safety Code section 4730 and shall be named the Consolidated
Sanitation District of Orange County (District). [G.C. 56844(v)] (As used
herein, "CSDOC" refers to the nine Districts both jointly, singly and in any
combination.)
2. As a result of consolidating, the nine existing districts shall be dissolved
and be reorganized as one consolidated District with one consolidated
Board of Directors under California Health and Safety Code Section 4730.
At the time of consolidation the Board of Directors would include
representatives from the following jurisdictions (G.C. 56844(n)]:
County (1) - County of Orange Unincorporated Area
Cities (20)
Anaheim Irvine Tustin
Brea La Habra Santa Ana
Buena Park La Palma Seal Beach
Cypress Los Alamitos Stanton
Fountain Valley Newport Beach Villa Park
Fullerton Orange Yorba Linda
Huntington Beach Placentia
Sanitary Districts (3)
Costa Mesa Garden Grove Midway City
3. Directors of the district shall be compensated in accordance with applicable
state law.
4. All system facilities shall be transferred from CSDOC as of the effective
date of consolidation in an "as-is" condition, without any payment or repair
obligation from CSDOC. [G.C. 56844(k)(v)]
5. All lands, buildings, real and personal property, assets and appurtenances
held by CSDOC as of the effective date of the consolidation shall be
transferred to the District. Such assets are enumerated in the CSDOC
3000 31 WOODRUFF,SPRADUN&SMART
3 11 -7- Scptcm cr 3, 1996
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the year ending June 30,
1995. (G.C. 56844(b)]
6. The District shall be designated as the successor to CSDOC and retain all
of the rights, duties and obligations of the former CSDOC with respect to
enforcement, performance or payment of any outstanding bonds, contracts
or obligations of the former CSDOC. [G.C. 56844(m)]
7. All previously authorized charges, fees, assessments and/or taxes
currently in effect by CSDOC shall be continued by the District. [G.C.
56844(t)]
8. The formation of Special Zones within the District, pursuant to California
Health & Safety § 4850, are to collectively include the entire service area
and individually include the specified areas as shown on the attached map.
The Special Zones shall continue the existing rate structures from the
CSDOC districts until such time as the District Board of Directors may find
it appropriate to make revisions. [G.C. 56844(e)]
9. The District shall assume all joint use flow agreements and maintenance
agreements. The terms and conditions of all contracts existing on the
effective date of consolidation, between and among the Districts, or any of
them, shall remain in full force and effect and shall be ratified by the Board
of Directors at the first meeting of the new District. All contracts between
the Irvine Ranch Water District and one or more County Sanitation
Districts, including those relating to ownership of capacity rights in
treatment, disposal and sewer facilities shall be assigned to the new
District and remain in full force and effect. All contracts between County
Sanitation District No. 14 and one or more County Sanitation Districts shall
also be assigned to the new District and remain in full force and effect.
10. CSDOC shall transfer any and all indebtedness and the levying for
payment purposes of taxes, surcharges, assessments, rental or rates to
the new District. [G.C. 56844(c)]
11. CSDOC shall file a statement with LAFCO that the reorganization shall not
adversely affect or impair the status of any employee of CSDOC or the
District. As of the effective date of this reorganization, all employees of
CSDOC shall become employees of the District. Rates of pay, accrued
vacation and sick leave, vacation and sick leave accrual rates, employee
rights, insurance, retirement benefits, and all other benefits and programs
shall be transferred over to the District at then-current levels. Memoranda
=ppp.ppp32 WOODRUFF,SPRADLW&SMART
9 1 -8- Seppmm cr 3, 1996
of Understanding in place under CSDOC shall be transferred and assigned
to the new District. [G.C. 56844(I)]
12. Permits issued to CSDOC shall be transferred and assigned in full force
and effect to the new District. The new District shall be authorized to
assume all rights, responsibilities and duties as contained within the
permits and to continue operations without interruption. Such permits shall
include but not be limited to the District's National Pollution Discharge
Elimination System Permit, including a waiver for full secondary treatment
pursuant to Section 301(h) of the Federal Clean Water Act, and all other air
and land permits. [G.C. 56844(v)]
13. Permits issued by CSDOC shall be transferred and assigned in full force
and effect to the new District. The new District shall be authorized to
assume all rights, responsibilities and duties contained in said permits and
in the laws authorizing the issuance of said permits. Such permits shall
include but not be limited to Sewer Connection Permits and Industrial
Wastewater Discharge Permits.
[G.C. 56844(c)]
14. The consolidated District shall assume all contracts and obligations current
and pending of CSDOC. [G.C. 56844(m)]
15. The effective date of this consolidation shall be July 1, 1997. [G.C.
56844(p)]
200 M32 WOODRUFF,SPRADLW&.SMART
3C 11 -9- Sepmm cr 3, 1996
9661 'E ngwaida5 _Ol_ 1 IipVC
Ia WST w'l dS'ddaWG M zmoo-o
O lISIHX3 Ol1N3WH3V11V
S3NOZ -lVI03dS d0 dVW
LOS ANGELES COUNT/ N
LA HABRA n
d �
zm ro6 EA
L ON
YORBA
LACENTIA LINDA '��,
fi 9s
E 11 z F�
yy LA BUE14A
�v0 PALM PA. K
yOy ANAHEIM VILLA O
w.ae CV PRESS PARK
OrtO sx STANTONLAM st 4 e RAN E
E O C
3 xae
$ 9 IT
N 3
GRO
STMI S
y wma mx me ':.
e ff 'a� 7
x Tus
11 9ANt " 14
a
F UNTA
ALLEY
HU N N
PAC
n o•
PACIFIC COST
ocEAN MESA IRVINE
b°
1
® B
NEWPORT
BEACH
BEACH IAA^
u
N
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS . s. .
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
1989
SRVM•CLR.CDR
CSDOC 1/95
LOS ANGELES COUNTY ,^
wma gF
LA HABRA nd '>
1S CFC90
'yY .1b
EA
n my
ON YOR' 13
""� uwwx LINDA 9LF
LACENTIA
O� r IM
�5 LA BUENA
�v¢ PALM PA K
ANAHEIM <
.. . CY RE S I '� ARK ,Q
LAMS S 5 STANTON
tl E
E
OHO u...,
TMI S
B 7
u
r. OSarnia
F UNTA
.... ALLEY q
HU N N
o...
PACIFIC
OCEAN OS A IRVINE
C 5 r�s
NEWPORT
BEACH
N
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS .
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
1989
SRVM-CLR.CDR
CSDOC 1/95
LOS ANGELES COUNTY F
LA BRA
B EAy�
xw uw
uuwiw. ON YOREA 1.9
LACENTIA LINDA
qo
E5 D r
VILLA C
eSls C R n .`: w PARK
,rj STANTON;
I m E
a s fa $3
' CARD N
"< d 4a ran Y'w
GRO
B 7
.NR 5 F`3`3' R O S
SANA
�Y
1 2 ALLEY `,i i
eH�f N'
UN:TNO
PACIFIC COSTA
OCEAN MESA IRVINE
i
O S
NEWPORT
BEACH �IIAII^
u
N
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS . ..
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
1989
SRVM•CLR.CDR
CSDOC M5
LOS ANGELES COUNTY
.rn°x q�FF
LA HABRA r-�d "W R'ry
GFc�~ry��Ml-
M ON �r�xauw 13
YORBA
LACENTIA LINDA 9iF
2
Fe' ° ULA IA E A °o
PALM .A K
Gy ANAHEIM VILLA O
uuim CY RE S ° w PARK
LOS STANTON
LAMITO s O I S S
a E
eg
`s
§ ys' GA N
GRO
IS
S xewrxnrn ve nm er
B 7
i Tus
O
6SANT 14
ANA
8 F UNTA
ALLEY
HUN IN N ++
.nn
PACIFIC COST
OCEAN MESA IRVINE
NEWPORT=
BEACH
N
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS d
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
1989
SRVM•CLR.CDR
CSDOC 1/95
LOS ANGELES COUNT' �Fy�
...me '✓
LA HABRA
B EA 3 G�
ON aeuum.nw YORBA 13
LACENTIA LINDA 92�,
e .e
2
LA UE
00 PALMA PAF K
ANAHEIM n CV IRE SS VILLA O
PARK
LAMITOS s 1 STANTON Q e RAN E
y GARD
GRO
I S
g 3g nr.na ve
B j 1O 7 TUS
SANT e� 14
11 � ANA woe,.e
s' UNT
e • ALLEY e
HUN N�Aa4
OCIFIC
EAN ... ETA IRVINE
ONEWPORT
BEACH �IIAII^
u
N
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
1989
SRVM-CLR.CDR
CSDOC 1195
LOS ANGELES COUNTY
wwmv HB
LA HABRA
. wm F90
wwu... ,y .1b
B EA O�
ON YORBA 13
LACENTIA LNDA 92t„
w eme we 2LA OF
p513UE A
�04Y PALMA PA K
yO0 w.ro CY R SANAHI VILLA LOS O
PARK
LAMITOSs 9 STANTON C RAN E
GAR
GRO
STMI S
S nmwme n nmrt y# ,? '' 3,
B O :via rya;
fw,
11 SANT v 14
F UNTA
.... ALLEYi
HU N N
O �
s
PACIFIC m.•n
OCEAN COSTA IRVINE
t
O
NBEACH
BEACH
N
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
1989
SRVM-CLR.CDR
CSDOC 1195
LOS ANGELES COUNTY �.
m a. w ~B
LA H`ABRA
B EAum
yry
ree..uw.nw 3
L ON YORBA 13 9
LACENTIA LINDA
M M 9
LA UE AE 2 � Oo
�Gvy PALM WA. K
Oy ANAHEIM I VILLA O
CYPREis I .c PARK
LOS STANTON e
LAMITOS O ° z RAN E
3
GAR D N
GRO
1
S wErtws�a nma
B 3E O U3 7
11 SANT 14
ANA ,..m..s
" F UNTA
ALLEY F,«
-rHU N
PACIFIC
E OCEAN COSTA IRVINE
5
NEWPORT
BEACH
N
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS d __
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
1989
SRVM-CLR.CDH
CSDOC 1/95
LOS AWELES COUNTY S
„wrnen w O9�Bt.
LA HyABRA NO gtiy
B FA �u
L ON
voeea � 13
I LACENTIA LINDA
O CO
0 UE 4A
Vy LA
PALM PAF K
Oy ANAHEIM •• y,
uurm CY RE I VIL LA O ••
1+ i•.
LOS PARK
STANTON ; "
LAM ROS O I I s RAN E
GARD
GRO
O. TUS
SA_NT
F UNTA
ALLEY
HU . NGT&N
.vue.
PACIFIC ua„.ve
OCEAN COSTA IRVINE
�4 g
1 r
Or
NBEAC
BEACH
u
N
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
1989
SRVM-CLR.CDR
CSDOC 1/95
LOS AN ELES COUNTY
Q� H
LA HABRA 4� `syC `�Ary
i..wlu..vwnw Rc� �4b
B EA
Mf
13
YORBA ,P
LACENTIA LINDA
9
2LA
y� U A
4r PALM PA K
c� ANAMEIM
10 uuim CY RE S VILLA 10
PARK
LAMITO t S STANTON e, RAN E
r`•
GAR N
GRO
TMI
S .. a B 7 r
3 i
UNT
ALLEY t
HUN INGITN Asa
. ...
� � 7
PACIFIC
OCEAN MESA IRVINE
a s s
5 ' NEWPORT
BEACH IIIA'
u
N
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
1989
SRVM-CLR.CDR
CSDOC 1/95
9661 'E-Tvrd-s -IT- I lZ
lwmsv M'Ia S'Aanv000M ZCOW-OWZ
10RI1SI0 03lVOIIOSN00 O3SOcIONd 3Hl NIHlIM
S301ANBS d0 NOISIAOad 3Hl MOd NV ld
..a., IISIHX3
Plan of Services
for the Consolidation of the
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
1, INTRODUCTION
This Plan of Services has been prepared pursuant to Government Code Section 56653,
which requires that a plan for providing services within the affected territory be provided
whenever an application for a change of organization is submitted to LAFCO. This
document will facilitate the consolidation of the nine (9) existing County Sanitation
Districts of Orange County(CSDOC)into one single County Sanitation District pursuant
to Health and Safety Code Section 4700 et seq. The resulting consolidated agency shall
be named the Consolidated Sanitation District of Orange County (District). This
consolidation proposes a transfer of all duties, responsibilities and liabilities of CSDOC
to the District The Plan of Services provides a description of CSDOC and its operations
and how they will be consolidated as the District
IL D .CCREMON OF CSDOC
A. General Information
The CSDOC is made up of nine independent special districts. Each district is a political
subdivision of the State of California and is governed by a representative of each city and
sanitary district within the district and,if the District includes unincorporated territory, a
member of the Orange County Board of Supervisors. Each district has its own budget
All districts except District Nos. 13 and 14 have thew own tax rate and trunk sewer
systems. District No. 13 buys capacity in the other districts' transmission facilities.
A Joint Administrative Organization was formed in 1948 to administer the business of the
jointly owned treatment and disposal facilities and the activities common to all districts.
This is provided for in a Joint Ownership Operation and Construction Agreement. The
day-today operation of the organization is under the direction of a General Manager,two
assistant general managers, seven department heads, for an authorized staff of 624
positions(616 FTE's)for the Fiscal Year 1996-97.
B. Types of Services,Level,and Range of Service Currently Provided
The CSDOC is a single-purpose public entity formed solely for the collection, treatment
and disposal of wastewater and its residuals and serves the wastewater collection,
treatment and disposal needs of approximately 2.2 million people. During 1994-1995,an
average daily sewage influent flow of 244 million gallons per day(MGD)was treated and
510 wet tons per day of residual solids(biosolids)was produced CSDOC encompasses a
470 square-mile area of Orange County that includes 23 of the County's 31 cities.
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Page I
Ford Sauvajot Management Group,Inc. C2000FlanServdoe 919196
CSDOC operates the third largest wastewater management agency of its kind west of the
Mississippi, with assets valued at more than one billion dollars. The nine individual
districts own about 650 miles of major trunk sewers, 22 pumping stations and two major
treatment plants with disposal facilities to safely discharge the treated effluent through an
ocean outfall into deep ocean waters. The treatment plants process an average of more
than 244 million gallons of wastewater per day.
Reclamation Plant No. 1 is located in Fountain Valley. It has a current operational
primary treatment capacity, including standby, of 108 MOD and a secondary treatment
capacity of 66 MGD.
Treatment Plant No. 2 is in Huntington Beach. It has a primary treatment capacity,
including standby, of 286 MOD. Plant No. 2 provides advanced primary treatment to all
of the wastewater that enters the plant and secondary treatment to up to 75 MGD of the
total flow.
Table 1 highlights the service area characteristics and wastewater system features.
Table 1
Service Area Joint Works Facilities
As of June 30, 1995
Total Population Served(estimated) 2,275,000
Service Area(estimated) 470 square miles
Total Number of Cities Served 23
Total Miles of Trunk Sewers 650
Number of Pumping Stations 22
Number of Treatment Plants 2
Reclamation Plant No. 1 Rated Capacity 108 MGD
Treatment Plant No. 2 Rated Capacity 286 MGD
Total Rated Capacity 394 MGD
Reported Average Daily Flow
Reclamation Plant No. 1 84 MGD
Treatment Plant No. 2 160 MOD
Total Average Daily 244 MGD
Flow
C. Description of Sanitary Sewer System
CSDOC processes wastewater from the collection systems of the various cities, water
districts and local sewer agencies. They do not deal directly with individual customers
except for portions of District No. 7, which is located primarily in unincorporated
territory of the County.
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Page 2
Ford Souvajot Management Group,Inc. CSDOCtPIsmServ.doc 9191%
CSDOC's assets consist of individual district assets and each district's respective share of
jointly owned assets. Table 2 summarizes the respective District ownership in jointly
owned and separately owned property, plant, equipment and construction in progress, at
cost, as of June 30, 1995:
Table 2
District Ownership
Jointly(honed Separately (honed Total
Total property,
plant,and equipment $742,677,706 $304,190,579 $1,046,868,285
Less accumulated
depreciation $282,776,401
Net property,plant
and equipment $764A91.884
D. Additional Assets
In addition to its real property and facilities, CSDOC owns service vehicles, equipment,
tools, repair parts inventory, and communications and office equipment. CSDOC
maintains cash, liquid securities to meet its cash flow requirements, and other reserves.
The following table summarizes the districts' reserves budgeted for the end of Fiscal
Year 1996-97.
Table 3
Reserves Analysis
"Dry Period"Operating Cash Flow $29,543,000
Operating Contingency Reserve 11,811,000
Debt Service Reserves Fund Balance 55,641,000
Capital Reserves 48,064,000
Environmental Requirements Reserves 5,000,000
Capital Share(Flood/Earthquake Reserves) 75,758,900
Operating share(Flood/Earthquake Reserve) 117,345,500
Total $343,163,400
E. Liabilities
As of June 30, 1996, CSDOC liabilities included debt in the amount of approximately
$408,255,000. These issues include $408,210,000 of Certificates of Participation (COP)
and $45,000 of general obligation(0.0.) bonds. The Districts have maintained their AA.
rating from Standard and Poor's Corporation and As rating from Moody's Investor
Services,although all COP issues are backed by issuance of letters of credit and are rated
AAA. No new COP issues are budgeted for Fiscal Year 1996-97.
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Page 3
Ford Sauvajot Management Group,Inc. CSD0C1PIanServ.dac 9/9/96
The Fiscal Year 1996-97 Budget provides for $35,973,000 to service the debt on the
various COPS issued. In addition, there is a $15,000 annual payment to maturity in
January 1999 for the G.O.bonds in District No. 11.
In addition, the districts have booked, as of June 30, 1995, over $2.5 million in
compensated absences potential liabilities. Further, there are claims and judgments
payable amounting to$541,000. CSDOC's funds are adequate to cover these obligations.
Consolidation of the districts will have no impact on the liabilities of CSDOC. Under
consolidation into a single County Sanitation District,the new County Sanitation District
assumes all predecessor district obligations. Further,the districts are presently joined by
agreement to manage and fund liabilities.
The new consolidated District will establish special zones upon consolidation to continue
differential user fees and to ensure that predecessor districts' outstanding debt is serviced
by only those residents who originally assumed that debt. The boundaries of each zone
will be the same as those of each predecessor district. The new consolidated District will
establish nine (9) zones to differentiate and account for costs, revenues and liabilities of
the existing districts. In addition, an Improvement District (ID) could be formed
coincident with each predecessor district's service area to enable proper segregated
accounting for the retirement of the existing Certificates of Participation (COPS) debt.
As new future borrowing may occur, new ID's would be formed to include the service
area benefiting from the projects. Such new ID's would not necessarily have boundaries
congruent with the zones. For projects at the treatment plants, however,an ID to include
all of the new District's service area could be formed to properly allocate the cost of such
improvements that would benefit all the zones. It is also expected that the consolidated
District would continue the practice of dedicating Ad Valorem Taxes where it would be
collectable within a zone to the retirement of long-term debt of an appropriate ID.
F. Management and Employees
CSDOC presently operates in a consolidated fashion pursuant to the provisions of the
Health and Safety Code Section 4840 et seq. CSDOC currently employs approximately
616 fdl-time employees. Legal Services are provided by the law firm of Woodruff,
Spradlin and Smart auditing services are also provided by contract. In addition, various
other services are contracted-out, as appropriate, throughout the Fiscal Year. These
include such varied services as groundskeeping, environmental review, ocean research
and reporting, etc. CSDOC's organization chart is included in CSDOC's Fiscal Year
1996-97 Budget which is submitted along with this application. The existing net joint
operation budget for Fiscal Year 19%-97 is $48,700,000. The principal functional units
are as follows:
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Page 4
Ford Souvajot Management Group,Inc. CSDOCVtaaSM doc 9N196
Fiscal Year
1996-97
General Manager's Department $1,814,760
Human Resources Department 2,213,610
Finance Department 3,489,030
General Services Department 6,403,160
Operations and Maintenance Department 30,105,950
Technical Services Department 7,935,860
Engineering Department 787,630
Total $52,750,000
Less Joint Operating Revenues (4,050,000)
Net Joint Operating Expenses $48,700.000
Consolidation of the districts into a single District would result in the continuation of
management and operational structures and functional expenditures similar to those
described above. Operations of the new District would remain the same as the current
operations of CSDOC. Consequently, there would be no change in employee
compensation and employee benefits as adjustments would not be required. The
transition from the existing joint operation to a single District operation would have no
impact on employees,their occupational status, or their benefits.
G. Rates and Charges
Each district, except District No. 14, has an adopted Sanitary Sewer Service Fee to
provide funding for operating the sewer systems in accordance with the Clean Water Act
and CSDOC's Revenue Program. District No. 14 is funded through user fee charges to
the Irvine Ranch Water District. Sanitary Sewer Service Fees are set annually by each
district after a review of projected needs. For Fiscal Year 1996-97, as for the past five
years, fees have not been raised.
Current annual single family residential Sanitary Sewer Service Fees are as follows by
district:
District No. I $83.24
District No. 2 71.52
District No. 3 73.89
District No. 5 96.75
District No. 6 76.47
District No. 7 50.09
District No. 11 60.00
District No. 13 100.00
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Page 5
Ford Sauvajot Management Group,Inc. CSDOC%PIanServ.doe 919/96
As was indicated previously, establishment of special zones upon consolidation would
continue differential Sanitary Sewer Service Fees. Consolidation is expected to facilitate
reorganizing and streamlining the new District's operations.
H. Summary of Revenues and Expenses
The CSDOC Fiscal Year 1996-97 Budget, which is included in this application package,
contains detailed information regarding revenues and expenses. Attention is called to
Section 3,pages 1-14,of the Budget document for summary information.
11L DESCRIPTION OF THE CONSOLIDATED DISTRICT
A. General
The nine independent County Sanitation Districts currently collectively known as
CSDOC and which utilize joint operating, working capital and capital outlay accounts to
pay joint operating and construction costs, will be consolidated into a single County
Sanitation District pursuant to the California County Sanitation District Act (Health and
Safety Code Section 4700 et seq.). The boundaries of the consolidated District will be
the same as the outer boundaries of those nine predecessor districts.
B. Types of Services,Level and Range of Services
The new District will assume all duties, responsibilities and liabilities of the former
CSDOC. The District will own and operate the wastewater treatment system which
provides sewage collection,treatment and disposal services currently owned and operated
by the nine(9) Sanitation Districts known jointly as CSDOC.
C. District Structure
The District's organization will be the same as that structure which presently exists under
the CSDOC joint operating agreement for the operation and administration of the joint
facilities.
D. Governing Board Composition
The new District will be formed under California Health and Safety Code Section 4730.
Under Health and Safety Code Section 4730, the governing body of the consolidated
District would be made up of one representative for every existing member city, sanitary
district, and unincorporated portion of the County within the District's service area.
Board membership would decrease from 29 to 24 with the loss of double representation
for the Cities of Huntington Beach, Newport Beach, and Yorba Linda and the County of
Orange and removal of the Irvine Ranch Water District as an eligible water district.
E. Three Year Budget of the Consolidated District
It is anticipated that revenues and expenditures which would have been budgeted by
CSDOC for the operation and administration of joint facilities and the construction of
capital improvements will be the basis for the new District's financial plan. Attachment
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Page 6
Ford Sauvajot Management Group,Inc. CSDOCWIenSe".doc 9NN6
A is a 3-year projection of the District's budget under consolidation. The projection
covers Fiscal Years 1997-98, 1998-99,and 1999-2000.
Attachment B is a summary of anticipated capital improvements for the new District.
This summary of capital needs was derived from CSDOC's Joint Works Capital
Improvements budget prepared under assumptions included in the 30-year Facilities and
Expansion Plan("2020 Vision"approved by the Joint Boards of Directors in 1989).
IY._ IMPACTS ON CUSTOMERS
There will be no negative financial impact on customers. No rate changes are anticipated
as a result of the consolidation. Please refer to previous discussion regarding the
formation of special zones.
Y� IMPACTS ON OTHER AMISDI TION
There will be no service level impacts on any of the cities, sanitary districts, and other
agencies presently relying on services provided by CSDOC as the services
responsibilities, without modification, will transfer to the new District upon the effective
date of consolidation. Effective date is proposed as July 1, 1997.
YL IMPACTS ON REGIONAL PARTICIPATION
All CSDOC's contractual obligations will transfer to the new District upon the effective
date of consolidation. Accordingly,there are no anticipated impacts.
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Page 7
Ford Souvajot Management Group,Inn. CSDOCWIanSemdoe 9t9796
8/19/96
Consolidated Sanitation Distrct of Orange Coun
Projected Budoets
Fiscal Years 1997.98 Thru 1999-2000
1997-98 1998.99 1999-2000
Revenues
Industrial/Commercial Use Fees $ 6,678,000 $ 7.680,000 $ 8,832,000
Sewer Service Fees 64,586,000 65,617,000 67.799,000
Fees From Other Agencies 7,150,000 6,000,000 6,100,000
Connection Fees 5,784.000 7,510,000 9,404,000
Interest 20,752.000 22,565,000 24,583,000
Miscellaneous&Other 2.350,000 2,350,000 2,350,000
Property Taxes 30,986.000 30,971.600 30,971.000
New COP Issues 60,800.000 57,000,000 54,000,000
Total Revenues $ 199.086.000 $ 199,693,000 $ 204,039,000
Reauirentents
Collection System O&M Expenses $ 10,002.000 $ 10,522,000 $ 10,229.000
Treatment System O&M Expenses 53,724,000 54,717,000 55.730,000
Collection System Improvements 11,717,000 16,769,000 16,675,000
Treatment System Improvements 59,791,000 38,024,000 39,982,000
GO Bond Principal& Interest 16,000 16.000 -
Costs of New COP Issuance 3,040,000 2,850,000 2,700,000
COP Service& Retirement 34,491,000 40,067,000 45,227,000
Total Expenses $ 172,781,000 $ 162,955,000 $ 170M3.000
Revenue Exceedina Ex efL nses $ 28,305,000 $ 36,738.000 $ 33,496,000
Beginning Cash Balances 343,163,000 369,468,000 406,206,000
Ending Cash Balances $ 369,468,000 $ 406,206,000 $ 439,702,000
Appropriations. Dedications & Reserves
"Dry Period"Operating Cash Flow $ 29,840.000 $ 30,597.000 $ 31,060,000
Operating Contingency Reserve 11.936,000 12,237,000 12,381,000
Capital Projects Completion 50,000,000 50,000,000 50,000,000
Environmental Requirements Reserve 5,000,000 6.000,000 5,Oo0,000
Required Debt&COP Service Reserves 36,039,000 38,872,000 41,572,000
"Dry Period"COP Service Cash Flow 15.789,000 19.186,000 17,998,000
Property&Liability Catastrophe Reserve 220.864,000 250,314.000 281,691,000
$ 369,468,000 $ 406.206,000 $ 439,702,000
Unappropriated Cash & Investment Balances $ - $ $
CONSBUD.XLS Consolidated 9:58 AM
AhachmenlB
County Sanitation District No. 1
Schedule of District Collection System Projects
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
A B C D E F O N I J N L
TOTAL COST SIMO0 BUDGET ESTRED ESTREO EST RED EST REO FIVE EST 6YEARS TEN COST TO
PROJECT TO 2020 IN PROGRESS 183647 196748 1"" 1M0.2000 "00.2001 YEAR TOTAL 20013006 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE
1.Seme Me Tlw4 Mme"ROO.(B) 6.500.000 0,500,000 6,500.000
2.MBFeMneees Pro" 1350. 125.000 125,000 125.000 125.000 125,000 625,000 625,000 l.mooc
TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ].]0.000 126.0% 125,000 125.000 125.0001 125,000 828000 ]125000 ]]SO
PORTION FUNDED BY DISTRICT 1.MASTERAANNEO FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION
S.MASTER.nANNEDFhDUTMSPRESENTLY UNDER DESIGN
S.MASTERA NEOFA WIESSLNEDULEDFDRFUTUREWSIGNORCONSTR1 lON
County Sanitation District No. 2
Schedule of District Collection System Projects
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
A 0 L D E F G H I J K L
TOTAL COST (BOMB BUDGET EST RED EST REO EST RED EST REG FIVE EST 5 YEARS TEN COST TO
PROJECT TO 202D IN PROGRESS 199&9), 1997-28 1998-99 1999-3000 3000-2m1 YEAR TOTAL 2001-2006 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE
I.Repare Eudle Remt Tone Sower.PB Ito Em"er 6.500. 6.5W,Wo Si GO.OGo
2.Repacemenl of Nwkhope Plarentu Tmnk,2-3R 6.2W.W0 250.000 3.000.000 3.OW.OW 6,2w.= 6,260,
3.Replacement of Cypau Am.Supmnk, Z<R 5.250.IX3 2W.W0 250.000 Eoco,000 5,26G,
a.Aloseuxoent of YwN Linea noon,Station 100,0.V SOWO 50.003 50,000 lco.00cl
5.Ta91mmtgXor Sever,233(3) 1.800. IAOO.000 1.800,NG
6.91 Faewoy MeninB Project.2-TA loSoce, 15,DA So'coo 90.000 WOOD
T.BOIsi Gower RMMf(3) 460,0130 060,000 460.000
8.B01evlkilnooln Trunk RelN1(3) 3M.OW 325,W0 325.W0 325.W]
9,Sana Me Roper lnV Narrows BAcows.2-1L5Rt"• <.3T1.OW 37
I.W0 150.Guo I.000,Wo 2.WW W 0.0 050.0 <,WO.m < Wg,O . p
10.Some Me RIVer Into IS Food,,2.31... 13.561, fN.WJ 2W,OW 25C,W0 3WOAW 5.000.000 8,500,000 Em.000 13.SOD000
11.1.5 Process
YNN9 Pf.0d.,2.15 109.000
coo
25,00 W W0 p 25,000 25, 0 25.000 1W, 100.00
12.Pump Sleoo RMWs.2-37'• LW W W,5DO 5 20,O <O,W W O 300.000 40.G IWW W,O C ,000
13.South Same Na RN m er Trunk Easement.2.39 74,000 L. 70.000 70,000 TD,OW
14.MOmllmeous Proonds, 5AW.DW M.000 20D.000 200.000 200.000 200. 1000.000 LOW OW 2,000, 3.400.000
TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS N,TOB,WO aF1,W0 SSS,OW 1,Sm,WO 1023 WO T,115,OW BW0,000 310]S WO 1B 10,008 M.M8000 3,m0 W0
COST REIMWRSED 1.MA ITpigANNED FAGUTIESPRESENRY UNDER CONSTRUCTION
PORTION FUNDED W OTHER DISTRICTS 2.MASTER�PLANNEO FALIUFIES%iESENRY UNDER DESIGN
••• PORTION FUNDED BYOTXER gSTRICTS 3.MASTEfl�PLANNED FACIUTIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN ON CONSTRUCTION
County Sanitation District No. 3
Schedule of District Collection System Projects
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
A E C D E F 0 H I J K L
TOTAL COST W"6IN MMET EST REG EST REG EST REG EST REG FIVE EST S YEARS TEN COST TO
PROJECT T02DM PRCGME9B 19B9-W 18a]49 I"BM lmN w 2M04001 YEAR TOTAL 2001-2000 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE
1.Me;Ie 9rament SUNdnk Road 13) 4OD.000 50.OM 3M,OM SOAC eM,MO eM,M0
2.Sister Ave FMlGNoftY Ser;r,11-1]-1(1)In..5%) 1M,MD 119,OM IQWD 10,M0 10,OM
3,Sister Ave P.S.Enforcement.11-17.1 or(12.4%) 1,195,M0 1,1M,M0 95.OM 95.000 ".000
A.Miramar Repel lnleraga Parallel(3) STOi 5.700,000 S,Np,CW
S.VVe abe ReOef Tronk(3) 700.0)0 700,000 7041,001)
S.Omn9a-Wealem Sue9unk Rettflewn,12 G) I.M).MO 57.000 100.001) 1=000 50,000 1.150.oM ijilo'llbo
].Nnotl INT Retlel,OrenpeNorye%Meta 131 3.=,coo lOD,000 1,SM,M0 1.501 ],1M.oso 200.000 3,MD,
B.HOOYer-NtlaMm 5u5Wnk flellMen TraeY I3I 1.050. E0.000 SHOO SOO,OOo I,D5D.000 I.M. 00
9.MIIIr-HOIDer.Mean le 1-fillseerouB5,3.3&1(3) 5.305,000 5.000 W.= 1W,000 3,OOgOW 2,O01 1d1,CW 5,300,000 E=.coc
10,MIIIr-HCMr lm,now- Imperial HA,_336-3(3) 2,932, U. 1,500,OOD 1.am. 0 2,NO." 2,900.01
11.Los Names;Su umak RMM(3) 4,900,000 n.wo.MO 4.acx% o
12.McBnolla Rallel Sewer.WeNmNslr%Treak,135E(3) 1550,000 1,OOD,OW w.030 500M 1.550.000 1,550,000
13.Tactile Pipe Made,3-36•' 2.500.05c1 1,9M. S)i IM,aM EOD.MD SM,
10.WNMnYer Are.Faro Mein ReMrmeM,138E 4.6315.000 4XILMIC 'AM,000 300,000 M.001
15, 4SFreewyVtltlebq,3-37 43.000 B. 5.O0 III= 10000 10.000 35.000 n.00,
16.SM &NMols$Oe fPo ,R02b'15)8%) 500.000 5M,OM SM,
17.Min Pump Suisse Reha0.2JT...I M) ]0],OM ), Si ,MD 5M.000 50,000 ]M,0o0 TO,
18.MlMelbneous pmlerls 5,2M.OM 2M.OM 2M,Mo 2MM0 2M.IKD 9M.DM 1.OM,M0 1.BM. 3pM,DOD
TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 41,951.000 i681,OM 3.7t00M 2,980,000 5,610.00D e2800110 1.00000 17,990,000 13.000.000 MM0,00011
2500,M0
PMIMLLY PUNDEO9Y d9T111CT 11 1,I MRP NEDFACILITIESPRESENTLYUHOERWMTRULl10N
•• dAM pEX01N0 2.MASTER-PLMNEO FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER DESIGN
"' PMTIALYFWOEDEYOTHERMIRRICTS 1 MASTER-PANNED FACILITIES SCNEDULEO FOR FUTURE CESIDN OR CONSTRUCTION
County Sanitation District No. 5
Schedule of DIs1Nct Collectlon System Projects
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
A B C 0 E F 0 H I J M L
IE
Y]M8 BUDGET EST RED EST RED EST RED EST RED FARE EST6 YEARS TEN COSTTO
PROJECT IN PROGRESS 199591 NNI.BB 1998.19 19BB3c00 me-2001 YEM TOTAL IDB1d0011 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE
1.hfts,PUMP Season RAN.2-37 ry]5%) 12.000 W.W] 100,00] 900,0W 152.500 1,A2,SW 1.303
2.Pump Salon Re9abilily PLe & 5001000 bW.
].W.CmIHmy GnNty Tmnk RMab,53130)'(20%) 5]9,OW 50,0W 50,OW W,
<.DoC von Twnk RMaMIiMOon(3) 2,W0,000 2,W0.
5.somoe PfnnMwle RWNm SW.WO 5001
B.MIseelle ue PmN. ]S.OW 75000 IS,OW ]5,W0 ]S.DW 375(NO ]]5.W0 ]W 1,3]5A00
TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 651AW "fi.D0 ITF000 B]6 W0 M.M. 18,000 1,831,8W ]]]bAW 6,W3 00 1.2]bAW
PARTMLLV FUNDED BY DISTRICT No.a 1.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER CO115TRUCTION1
•' PAATMLLY FUNDED BY OTHER NSTRICTS 2_NASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER DESIGN
3,MASTERAAMNEO FACILITIES SCHEMED FOR FUTURE DESIGN&CONSTRUCTION
County Sanitation District No. 6
Schedule of Olshict Collection System Projects
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
A B C D E F G H I J N L
TOTALCOST OGol99 BUDGET EST REG EST REG EST REG EST REG FIVE EST S YEARS TEN COSTTO
PROJECT T020" IN PROGRESS 1996-97 199748 1998.99 19114ND 2WD EA 200 2001 YOUR TOTAL 11008 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE
Re hub,Coast Hwy Geo,Tmnk Ra5,5-3]J(1)•(90%) 2,352.d]0 2,157,0O0 M.000 200.O00 200.=
2.Watson Ave l Cel3esnb S.Sewer.6-13(3) 3,M2.000 32,W0 25.000 950.000 25.001) 1,000,000 2.2d1.000 3.200,CO3
3.Fa1Mew Refld. Rakes St b Whon SI..6-12(2) 3,426000 375,W0 6O.00) 2.M.= I,WO,OW 3,13W,O0t 3,050,000
<.OISNq 6Trvnk ParelMl(3) I,EW.W3 16'.p.000 1.503,000
S.Domr Dom Tmnk Pmllel(3) 1.SW.ND 1$OO,WO 1.500.000
6.C015eeAm PS Rehab 5 FM RepI,]-23.1(Old 6=5%) 20,090 50,OW 2,SD] )2.500
].Pump Station ReM0,2-37'(5%) 261.030 1,OW IS,= 30,000 165,dp W.000 260,00) 260.O03
6.MAccV. oue Pmlerss 1300.000 W.000 50.000 50.000 SO= W.W0 200.000 2W.M 4W,000 550,OW
TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 13,ST6,000 2,686.Wo 360 COD ],000,000 1,262600 80.000 50.000 4,202,61M LSWtN.1 10,260,000 650,000
PM1NLlY NrmEDBY d9iRCT5 1.Me5TERR NEOFACILITIESMBEN YONOERCpBINGCLION
•• PARTALLYNImE09Yd5TRICTST514 2.MASTERAIANNEO FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER OESgN
••• PARTIALLY FUNDED UY OTHER DISTRICTS 3.N0.STERFUNNEO FACILITIES SCHEdREO FOR FIINRE 0E51GN OR CONSTRUCTION
County Sanitation District No. 7
Schedule of DIBDIct Collection System Pr0)eCIS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
A B C D E F G H I J K L
TOTAL COST w3 BUDGET EST REO EST REO EST REO EST REO FIVE EST 5 YEARS TEN COSTTO
PROJECT TOW20 IN PROGRESS IM-97 111l 1MSM 1BBBd000 20W3O01 YEAR TOTAL WOt-200S YEM TOTAL COMPLETE
I.PUMP Station ASandonmenl.1-143 ISS W.000 100.030 ISOLOW IN,=
2.pangs Pool Aves Trunk Regaamenl.7-1]O) B20 35, W,OW 1115,OW NO,IMD MAW M.000
3.Tpslln Ab Base Fatllaiea W. IO.WO 10.W0 W,DW 10.OW W,000 CO.OW
<.MLsc.Pump Station RenaCllmlian.237"'—(251N IM2, 12,OW W.= 150.DW 1.W0.000 2W,OW 1.CW,OW I,CW.OW
S.NmM Trunk Rep%..nl(3) 2,850. Ea" 1MO,W0 1,000, 2,050,OW 2W,W] 2.SW,
S.Relocate Glaltt-Red Hill Siphon,7-1-2 ❑. 27, W,OW W,000 W.
). GNIar-Rea Hill IMermpa l3) 5.900. 3W.OW 3W,OW S.OW.OW SWSDW
S.Red Hill IMemeNor Paul(3) IAW. 1.100.000 1.IW=
S.Lempl Heights SeNer RegxameM. ]-22-1R(3) 5,399, l,aa9. W,DOY I,W0.0W Lsoo 00 SW. 3,5W,W0 3,5W,000
10.Impovtion.to Noun St.P.S..]-]-1(2)'(20%) 1,151. 1]l, 3W000 0.10,W0 W,O00 S30,W0 ISDOW 900,W0
11.Bmmm9 Took Repb0n¢nl(3) BW, SWAM O50.W0
12.Ldhge Ave PR PmeVelFpm MEm,]-2}1 1,395, W.OW 3BO.OW BW.oW CS,OW 1.3)fi.OW 1,3]SAOO
13.MIsxOarl Pro" 2.]W, 1W,000 IMIM 1W.OW 1WOW 1W. SWLOU SW,000 1,OW 1.>W.WO
TOTAL LAPITALIMPROVEMENTS tJ,3]0.W0 2,1N,W B]OpW 1.)A0.0W 3,HO,OW 0.1WpW I.—red11 ,OW B,1WAW 19,50,000
• PoWp16 TO SE SHARED BY MST.M 1.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION
•• RWrI TOBFS WWOST.B&MT.P 2.MASTERVLWNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER DESIGN
••• PORTIONS TO IS SHARED IN MST.1 3.NU STER PIANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION
"'• CONSTRUCTION FUNWIGFROMCAL-TRAH56CITIES
••••• PARTIALLYFUNCEDW MERDISTRICTS
County Sanitation District No. 11
Schedule of District Collection System Projecb
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
A S C U E F G H I J K L
TOTAL COST 613518 S110GET EST REG EST REG EST REG EST REG FIVE ESTSYFARS TEN COSTTO
PROJECT T02020 IN PROGRESS 1999-9T 199T-98 19MM ION-20b 2000.2001 YEAR TOTAL 2C01.2b8 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE
1,HMMgKe Beach PuMhmo AingmmeM(3) 350,00 20,00p 30GOW 39000 250.000 250,020
2.SWIer Ave FWGmIcy Sewer,11-1]-1(1)•(]d5%) 339,OW 309. 30.000 W.OW 30,O00
3.Slater Ave P.S.Replacement,11-17-1(1)'(8].9%) 63N." 5749.O0] 650.000 twom 650.O00
e.Slater Ave.RoM(3) 3600,000 2W,OW 200,0W 2.600,000 2.91)).000
S.GPMenwes151.Sewer Replmsmenl.1117-2(2) 3650.000 5GW0 500.000 2.000,000 1W,00O 2,SM W0 3650,000
6.H fl Nleruplor(3) 3.000. 3,WOOW 3.000,OW
T.SMIe1Spr,d.%Replefemenl(3) fiW.OW W0000 ..DD)
8 Wmner Am Sewer Relld(3) 70D.000 ]WAW ]WACO
fi.Mlb.Pump Slelbn lmpmvemenls.3J]^(13%) b5, j
ID,WD 0.000 3W,OW AO.OW AW.OW eW.OW
IO.PS.Repkmat6MMm.13) W0, 900.W3 5W,0W
11.Suce N Nicents St.Trunk ReNIb (3)•(eft%) ]]5,0W 3)5,W0 375.0W
12,Mbnllenepua Promos 3,025.0W ]5.000 ]50W ]S,GW ]5.000 79 3]50W 3]5W0 750,OW 1,2)5W0
TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 30203,UW AASAb 916,W0 2,b6AW 016000 1600 89 W0 6,3b,W0 12 e06000 1,3]S Ob
PARMLLY FUNOEDW OnT oCTNe 3 1.uuSTER-P. INEO FACILRIES PRESEWLY 0NOER CONSIRuCTION
•• PARIMLLY FUNCEp9Y piHER dSTNICTS 2 WSTERA NED FACIumU PRESEWY UNDER DESIGN
County Sanitation District No. 14
Schedule of District collection System Projects
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
A B C O E F C H I J N L
TOTAL COST B 6 BUDGET EST RED EST RED ESTRED EST RED FIVE EST 5YEARS TEN COST TO
PROJECT TO 2020 IN PROGRESS ISWO7 1997-90 1998.99 1999-2000 200 .2001 YEAR TOTAL Ml.2006 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE
1.Impro9emenlslu Mein SI.P.S.. 29A(2) "p254) 2=000 95.01K 1.100.000 125.000 2.125,M 2.125,000
2.Mbe.Pump Station RNuOltilePon,2J7""'(25%) 7.500 100 200 2,00o 200 7,500 2.500
3.Mlwllaneous Pmjecis 1.090.000 25.000 25.000 25,000 25.0011 115,000 125.000 240,000 8511.000
TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 0?12 93A00 MS 100 1121 0 161000 36200 25000 i,347600 125.m 2A72.600 850.M
PARPALLYFUNDEDBYDISTRICT867 1.MASTER-PLANNED FACRITIES PRESENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION
PAATNLLY FUNDED BY DISTRICT] 2.MASTERA NETT FACIDHES PRESENT.Y UNDER DESIGN
3.MASTER NEDFACILmESSOIEDULEOFOLFURIREOESIGNCRCONSTRMPM
Consolidated District Total
Schedule of CIsNc1 CollecOon system PMfeCb
CAMTAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
A B C O E F 0 N I J N L
TOTALCOST SI30196 BUDGET EST REp EST REp EST RED ESTREO FNE E9Tb YPAfl6 TEN COST--
TOIDM IN Pgpp0.E99 1PB6M 1Mde 1999-H 1M&)WB ZEN- 01 YFAR TOTAL 2001= YEARTOTAL COMPLETE
TOTAL CONSOLIDATED DISTRICT 1fi1,6A],500 19,41;W0L ),6W,1W 11,560,W0 16,599.500 16,901,700 120500W 60322,11410 BS<05 W0 129,665,000 12,)W WO
IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES
Transfer of All Service Responsibilities(Government Code Section 7 00)
All CSDOC service responsibilities will transfer to the new District, effective July 1,
1997. To prepare for this consolidation date, CSDOC will develop a single District
budget and plan of operation as appropriate. Since CSDOC presently operates in a
consolidated fashion under the terms of the existing joint operation agreement, no
obstacles are anticipated.
Transfer r of Assets. Liabilities. Contracts and Litigation (Government Code
Section 575021
Assets, CSDOC assets will be transferred to the new District. Consolidation would
result in all fixed assets of predecessor districts to be transferred at book value, less
accumulated depreciation, to the new consolidated District. The current net valuation of
these assets is $764,091,884 (as of June 30, 1995). In addition, all other assets jointly
held in the form of cash, bank deposits, investments, notes and accounts receivable will
be transferred to the new District.
Liabilities: The new District will acquire all legal obligations and responsibility for all
short-term and long-term liabilities of CSDOC. The District will assume payment of debt
service on the outstanding Certificates of Participation (COPS) and outstanding G.O.
bonds. The consolidated District will assume CSDOC's obligations to fund any
previously allowed benefits to retired employees of CSDOC.
Contracts: The District will assume all existing agreements, memoranda or other written
understandings entered between CSDOC and other parties.
Lifigation: The District will assume the position of the existing Districts in all existing
legal suits pending against or initiated by CSDOC. All costs and expenses, including any
judgment against CSDOC will be borne by the new District.
Formation Of Special Zones And Improvement Districts (Government
Code Section 57502)
Prior to the effective date of consolidation (July 1, 1997), CSDOC shall define the
boundaries of each special zone consistent with the intent to form a special zone for the
territory encompassed by the service area of each predecessor district.
In addition, CSDOC may define the boundaries for each former CSDOC COP zone to
facilitate the formation of an Improvement District to service the outstanding COP debt
upon consolidation into a single District.
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Page 1
Ford Sauvajot Management Group,Inc. CSDOCOmpGuide.doe 9191%
a
Resolutions will be prepared by CSDOC, for the approval by the consolidated District
Board of Directors, for the new District to establish special zones and improvement
districts,and setting Sanitary Sewer Service Charges for each special zone.
Transition Period
It is anticipated that all transfers of responsibilities, obligations, and assets will encounter
no obstacles, as the consolidation of the nine (9) districts into one County Sanitation
District essentially formalizes the existing joint operating policies, methods, and
practices. Accordingly, the transition period will consist of handling administrative and
accounting changes, but will not involve organizational restructuring, interagency fund
transfers, sale of assets, boundary changes, or any other matter that would materially
affect LAFCO's ability to order consolidation without an election (Government Code
Section 57801).
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Page 2
Ford Sauvajot Management Group,Inc. CSDOCUmpGutde.doc 9NN6
ITEM #14(g)
SUMMARY OF BIDS
Original Bid (May 21, 1996) Engineer's Estimate: $1,700,000
Pascal & Ludwig $1,644,000
Advanco 1,882,036
Margate 2,015,600
Sverdrup Civil 2,193,000
Pascal & Ludwig requested Bidder's Relief. Board granted and authorized rebid
of project.
Second Bid (August 21, 1996) Engineers Estimate: $1,900,000
Pascal & Ludwig $1,878,437
Margate 1,900,000
Advanco 1,956.231
Margate files protest letter on August 21, 1996.
Are the changes to the original project material in nature?
DMS:gc
J:\W PDOC%STEWART%REPORTS%092596.R1
REBID OF P1-40-2 AND P2-47-2
ORIGINAL ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $1,700,000
ITEMS ADDED/CHANGED:
a. Revisions to Hazardous Storage Lockers 50,000
b. Building 34,000
c. Ventilation to Metering and Diversion Structure 30,000
d. Polymer Dilution Tank Mixers 40,000
e. Hazardous Storage Locker Size Increase 10,000
f. Miscellaneous Hand Rail, Fencing, and Bridge 30,000
g. Cen Gen Instrument Air 8.000
Subtotal (Add) $ 202,000
ITEMS DELETED/CHANGED:
a. Liners from beneath Hazardous <10,000>
Storage
b. Clarification of Redwood Specifications < 1,000>
c. Revision of RFP Duct Reinforcement < 5,000>
d. Clarification of Coating Thickness for < 1,000>
Structural Aluminum
e. Deletion of Abandoned Gas Compressor < 6.000>
Demolition
Subtotal (Delete) $< 23,000>
TOTAL VALUE OF CHANGES $ 225,000'
NET VALUE OF CHANGES $ 179,000
CONTINGENCY (ROUND OFF) $ 21,000
ENGINEER'S REBID ESTIMATE $1,900,000
13.2% of Original Engineer's Estimate
DMS:gc
J:%W P D OCZTE WARTVRE POR TS\D92596.R2
J
ORDINANCE NO. 132
PROVIDING ADDITIONAL SERVICE CREDIT TO ELIGIBLE
DISTRICTS' EMPLOYEES WHO RETIRE EARLY
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA PROVIDING FOR AN EARLY
RETIREMENT INCENTIVE PROGRAM BY GRANTING
ADDITIONAL SERVICE CREDIT TO ELIGIBLE DISTRICTS'
EMPLOYEES AS AUTHORIZED BY THE COUNTY
EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT LAW OF 1937,
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 31641.04.
WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts No. 1, 2,
3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 adopted Resolution No. 95-19 and Resolution No. 95-53
approving an Early Retirement Incentive Program for all eligible Districts'
employees, as authorized by California Government Code Section 31641.04; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Joint Ownership, Operation
and Construction Agreement by and among County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2,
3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, District No. 1 is the appointed authorized agent to act
for every other District; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of County sanitation District No. 1, acting
as agent for County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14,
adopted Ordinance No. 126 on June 28, 1995, incorporating all of the same
provisions as in Joint Resolution Nos. 95-19 and 95-53; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District Nos. 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 have determined that the manner of performing service,
and the total cost savings of having higher compensated employees retire and
lower compensated employees hired to replace the retirees exceeds the total
actuarial cost of the additional service granted to those who retire under this
program.
NOW THEREFORE, the Board o Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1
of Orange County, California, does hereby ORDAIN:
Section I: All regular employees of the County Sanitation-Districts of Orange
County, California, who are eligible to participate as members and retire under the
Orange County Employees Retirement System are granted two (2) additional years
of service credit for retirement benefit purposes, provided they retire from regular
employment of the Districts during the period of January 1, 1997 through and
including March 31, 1997.
Section ll: The General Manager of the Districts is authorized to execute any
and all contracts or other documents and to transfer all required funds in order to
implement the authorized actions provided for herein.
Section III: The total cost savings of positions filled at a lower level or held
vacant for a period of time shall exceed the total actuarial cost of the additional
service credit granted and related paid leave pay-off costs.
Section IV: Districts shall pay the actuarially determined cost of this early
retirement incentive program over a period not to exceed five (5) years and on
such other terms and conditions as shall be set forth in a mutually agreed upon
written contract between the Districts and the Board of Retirement of the Orange
County Employees Retirement System.
Section V: This Ordinance shall become effective January 1, 1997.
Section VI: The Secretary of the Board shall certify to the adoption of this
Ordinance and shall cause a summary to be published in a newspaper of general
circulation as the District is required by law.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of County Sanitation
District No. 1 at a regular meeting held September 25, 1996.
Chair of the Board of Directors
County Sanitation District No. 1
Of Orange County, California
ATTEST:
Secretary of the Board of Directors
County Sanitation District No. 1
of Orange County, California
MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 25, 1996 TIME: 7-30 PA. DISTRICTS: 1, 2. 3. S. 6 7 11, 13 AND 14
DISTRICT T JOINT BOARDS
IMORENOI . . .... . . . . . MC OUIOAN ........ IKERRYI ......... . . . BOWMAN . . ..... . .
— —
IPERRY/SCHAFERI . . . . . �ERRVMAN ....... IFORSYTHEI ......... . BROWN ...�........
ICOONTZI . . ..... . . . . MUAPMY .......... ISCOTTI ............ . COLLINS . ......... — —
IMTTSI . .. .. . . . . . SALTARELU ........ (DEBAYI ............ . COX . —
IBTEINERI . . . . . . . . . . . ICO%I ..... .. ..... . . . GEBAYNES . . .........
(SELL)
AUE . ..... . ... . . . . . GENES F ......... _ _
DISTRICT 2 IBAUERI . ......... . . . DUNLAPF .. .......
IDOWNEVI . . .... ..... ECKENRODE ........ �G IPAMERI ........... . OUNIAP ... . ...... —_ —_ _—
IGULLUISONI ......... WELCH ........... y (DOWNEVI............ ECKENRODE . . . .... _
ISCOTR ............ COLLINS .......... y/_ IMRRY/SCMAFERI ...... FEMLYMAN . . . . ....
—
(BELL) .............. DENIES . . .......... JL IANDERSONI .......... FLOM .. .. . . . .... _
IPARKEAI ........... DUNLAP. .......... IMARSHALLI .......... GRIFFIN .. .. . . . ....
IANDERSONI ......... FLOM ............ IWELCHI . . ..... ...... GULLIXSON . . . . ....
—
IMORENOI ... . ..... MCUUMAN ........ MARDI . ............ HAMMOND ... .....
..
ICOONTZI ........... MURPHY .. ........ y/ IMUERI . ............ fEIPZIO . . .. . . ..... _ —_
JIMAKHEADI ... NOW.. . . . . . ..... �� IMNERI ............. LINN ....... ...... —
RTEINER.. .. . ....... SINGER . . . . . . ..... V IMORENOI . ........... MC OUIOAN.. ......
DALY) . ........... ZEMEL ... ......... 1 ICOONTZI . .. ...... .. . MARSHY . ... ......
NOPS
OALYI . . ........... 2EMEL ............ _&L SWANS) . . . . ... . . ... RICE . . . .... ..... _ .
SWANS) . . . . .. .. . . . .. RICE . . .. .... .... .
DISTRICT] IPOTTSI . . . . . . . . . . . .. SAWN ..L......... _ —
IDOTSONI ... ........ SAWN .. . . . ...... �L (ZLAKEI . . . ... . . . ... SAWN ........... —
aLAKETI............ SINGER ..... . .....'y RLAKETI. . . . . . . . . . . .. SINGER N ......... _ .
IKEMYI BOWNAN . . . . . ..... �L STEINERI . . . . . . . . . . ... STANTON ......... —
IFORSYTHEI . ........ NOWN ISTANTONI . .......... STENER .......... — —
.... ........
.......... � IMILLER) . . . .......... SWAN ............
ISCUTTI .... ........ DUNLAP
— —
IPARKERI . . . .. . . . .. . . . ......... W OAI ........ SYLVIA ...........
—
IAHDERSONI . .. . .. . . . FLOM . . .......... IOULLIXSON) .......... MLCH .... . ......
IMARSHALLI . .. . . . . . . GRIRN IDALYI .............. ZEMEL . ... . . ..... .
IBAUERI . . . ... . . . . . . LEIRIG ........... aG —
IMINERI . . .... . ..... LNN . ............ ✓ —_
IMORENOI . . ... . . . . . . MCUUIGAN ........ L STAFF OTHERS
IMNKHEADI . .. . .. .. . NOW............ ANDERSON . WOODRUFF ..
IEVANSI . . . ... . . .... RICE ............. GRAY ..... � ANDRUS . . .. �
ISTEINERI . .. . .. .. FAN19N ........ L HODOES ... .EMIR
� — . . . ..
IWAHLSTROMI . ...... SYLVIA ........... _� JONK ..... KIN . ..
IDALYI . . .. . .. . . .... ZEMEL ............ y_/ KYLE ..... LEE ... .....
CINDER .... LNOSlAOM ..
DISTRICTS LUDWN ... _ NIXON......
(COX) . . . ........... DEMY.......... MCINTYRE.. �� SHAW. .....
(STANTON) .......... $WINER...........
DOWN .. .. STONE ..... _
IDEMYI COX T PETERMAN . ..........
DISTRICT S TUCHMAN . . ........
HEAT
IPEflRYISCMAfEflI ..... FERRYFMN......... WILSON Y .. ...... _
(COX) . . . . ........ DEMY............ WILSON ✓
ISTANTONI .......... STEINER........... •
DISTRICT 7 �' .�M..""......y�/—� ........
M'ARDI ............ HAMMOND. ........ //FFF "L
(PDX) . ... .. ....... MITARELLI ........ —_
ICO%I ISCHAF. ...... . DEMY. .. .........
(COON . . . .
.... . FERRYMAN. . ....... V /y/H / vy��L
(MORENO) ... . ..... . . M03UIGAN ...... ,', /.`.'F.bw/..
INONTZ) .. . . .... . . . MARSHY . . ......
ISTANTONI . . ... . . . . . STENER. . . . . .. .. ., y
DISTRICT 11 X
IBAUERI . . . .... . . . . . EI ........D ✓
IBAUERI . . . . . . . . . . . . ETTLTTLOFF .........
.STRICT 13
(WELCH) .. . ...... . . ..iYYl1KW✓-........ ✓
IDALYI . . . ....... 2EMEL . . . .......::
IPARKEMI . . . . .... . . . DUNLAP. . ......... _
ICOONTZI .. . . ..... .. MEINER .
ISTANTONI ... ..... .. STENER. . . ........ ..L
DISTRICT 14 /
IMTTSI . ........... SALTARELU ........ L _
ICOONWARDI I ........... MAMMON .......... —
. ........... MAMMON........
ISTANTONI .......... $WINER... . . . .. ...
IMILLERI . ........... SWAN ... . .. . ..... JAWMOCIBSIDIRECTOMIDL02.
09/1N96
y
COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14
OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
MINUTES
JOINT BOARD MEETING
SEPTEMBER 25, 1996
JBICTS pFO9q
G
H
c�a a
C7 p 4
�'pTFCTiN�E
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018
s ROLL CALL
A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,2,3, 5,6,7,11, 13,and 14 of
o Orange County,California,was held on September 25,1996,at 7:30 p.m.,in the Districts'Administrative Offices.
Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for
Districts Nos. 1,2, 3,5,6,7, 11, 13,and 14 as follows:
ACTIVE ALTERNATE
DIRECTORS DIRECTORS
DISTRICT NO.1: x Pat McGuigan,Chair Ted R. Moreno
x James M.Ferryman,Chair pro tam _ Arthur Perry
x Mark A-Murphy _ Joanne Coontz
x Thomas R.Saftarelli _ Jim Potts
Roger Stanton _X_ William G.Steiner
DISTRICT NO.2: x Norman 7 Eckenrode,Chair _ Carol Downey
_JL_ Daniel T.Welch,Chair pro tam _ John M.Gullason
x John Collins George Scott
—]L_ Barry Denes _ Bob Bell
• Burnie Dunlap Glenn Parker
_z_ James H.Flora _ Steve Anderson
_I Pat McGuigan Ted R.Moreno
x Mark A Murphy Joanne Coontz
_IL_ Chris Norby Don Bankhead
x Sheldon Singer George L.Daket
Roger Stanton x William G.Steiner
x Bob Zemel _ Tom Daly
DISTRICT NO.3: _IL Sal A Sapien,Chair _ Harry M.Dotson
, x Sheldon Singer,Chair pro tam George L.Baker
x Walter Bowman _ Gail Kerry
_IL George Brown _ Marilyn Bruce Hastings
John Collins _ George Scott
•_ Bumie Dunlap _ Glenn Parker
• James H.Flora Steve Anderson
• Don R. Griffin Patsy Marshall
• Victor Leipzig Ralph Bauer
• Wally Linn Eva G.Miner
• Pat McGuigan Ted R.Moreno
.IL Chins Norby Don Bankhead
• Margie L. Rice James V.Evans
Roger Stanton x_ William G.Steiner
Charles Sylvia _ Roben Wahlstrom
x Bob Zemel _ Tom Day
DISTRICT NO.S: x Jan Debay,Chair John C.Cox,Jr.
x Wiliam G. Steiner,Chair pro tam _ Roger Stanton
x John C.Cox,Jr. _ Jan Debar,
DISTRICT NO.6: _x James M.Ferryman,Chair Arthur Perry
x Jan Debay,Chair pro tam _ John C.Cm Jr.
.x William G.Steiner _ Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO.7: __X_ Barry Hammond,Chair _ Mike Ward
x Thomas R.Saltarah,Chair pro tam _ Jim Potts
_IL Jan Debay _ John C.Cox,Jr.
x James M.Ferrymen _ Arthur Perry
__" Pat McGuigan _ Ted R.Moreno
x Mark A.Murphy _ Joanne Coontz
x William G.Steiner _ Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO. 11: __" Victor Leipzig,Chair _ Ralph Bauer
x _ Shiley Dettloff,Chair pro tam _ Ralph Bauer
Roger Stanton x William G.Steiner
DISTRICT NO. 13: _ John M.Gullurson,Chair _IL Daniel T.Welch
—_ Bob Zemel,Chair pro tam Tom Day
Jt_ Burnie Dunlap Glenn Parker
• Mark A. Murphy Joanne Coontz
William G.Steiner Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO.14: X Thomas R.Saharelli,Chair _ Jim Potts
x Mark Murphy,Chair pro tam Joanne Coontz
_.A_ Barry Hammond Mike Ward
x Wiliam G.Steiner Roger Stanton
�L Peer A.Swan Darryl Miller
_2_
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Minutes `
9125/96
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Don F. McIntyre, General Manager, Blake P.
Anderson, Assistant General Manager-Operations,
Judith A. Wilson, Assistant General Manager-
Administration, Penny Kyle, Board Secretary, Jim
Benzie, Kelly Christiansen, Janet Gray, Ed Hodges,
Patricia Jonk, Steve Kozak, John Linder, Mike
McCarthy, Mike Moore, Bob Oaten, Mike Peterman,
Wendy Sevenandt, Gary Streed, Michelle Tuchman,
Nancy Wheatley, Mike White
OTHERS PRESENT: Terry Andrus, Assistant General Counsel, Bill Knopf,
Phil Stone
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the Joint Chair
Joint Chair John Collins noted that initial meetings of the Rate Advisory
Committee (RAC) and the Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) had been
conducted. These working committees, comprised of members of the public and
private sectors, had been formed to assist with the Strategic Planning effort. He
invited Director George Brown to speak to the Directors about his observations
of these first meetings.
Director George Brown advised that the next meeting of the RAC was Thursday,
October 24, at 9:00-12 noon; the PAC would next meet on Thursday, November
14, at 9:00 a.m.-11:00 a.m. Both meetings will be conducted in the Board Room.
All Directors were encouraged to attend.
John Collins noted the strong attendance by Directors at the recent Strategic
Planning Workshop. He reminded District No. 2 Directors that a special meeting
to hear the Porter Plating appeal would be conducted Thursday, October 10,
1996, at 5:30 p.m.
The following tentatively scheduled upcoming meetings were then announced as
follows:
Operations, Maintenance, and Technical Services Committee -
Wednesday, October 2, at 5:30 p.m.
Planning, Design, and Construction Committee -Thursday, October 3,
at 5:30 p.m.
Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee -
Wednesday, October 9, at 5:30 p.m.
-3-
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Minutes
9/25/96
Steering Committee - Wednesday, October 23, at 5:30 p.m.
Directors were reminded that the CSDOC Second Annual Family Day would be
held at Plant No. 2 on Saturday, October 12, between 10:00 a.m.-2:30 p.m.
Joint Chair Collins announced that for the second consecutive year, the
Sanitation Districts had been awarded the Certificate of Achievement for
Excellence in Financial Reporting by the Government Finance Officers
Association. He noted that Mike White, Controller, had primary responsibility
for preparing the award-winning financial document.
John Collins introduced David Wilma, Special Agent for the United States
Environmental Protection Agency. Mr. Wilma worked with Source Control
Division in monitoring the sewer downstream from Venus Labs. Mr. Wilma
spoke of the efforts by the Source Control Division, which resulted in a search
warrant inspection. The U.S. District Attorney and the courts are now handling
the case. The following employees who worked on this matter received
Certificates of Appreciation from Mr. Wilma: Kelly Christensen, James
Davidson, Dave Engstrom, Darrell Ennis, Tom Gaworski, Mike Masterson,
Merrill Seiler, Deon Carrico, and Mike Reideler.
Joint Chair Collins presented a resolution to Director John Cox, Jr., expressing
appreciation for his efforts during his recent tenure as Joint Chair.
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of General Manager
Don McIntyre congratulated Nancy Wheatley, Director of Technical Services,
for her efforts regarding policies of combined sewer systems, which has resulted
in her receipt of the Hammer Award at the annual WEFTEC conference in
Dallas.
DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14
Approval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting
held August 28, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved,
as mailed.
-4-
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Minutes
9/25/96
DISTRICT 13
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular
meetings held July 24, and August 28, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes
be deemed approved, as mailed.
ALL DISTRICTS
Ratification of payment of Joint and
Individual District Claims
MOTION: Ratify payment of Joint and Individual District claims set forth on exhibits
"A" , 'B", and "C', attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and
summarized below.
ALL DISTRICTS O8/07/96 08/21/96 MISC.
Joint Operating Fund - $1.040,405.06 $523,972.97 $ 2,618.50
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 2,301,318.40 704,668.80 0.00
Joint Working Capital Fund - 237,881.45 242,106.62 1,030.10
Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 133,819.56 19,998.59 29,905.95
DISTRICT NO. 1 - (936.30) 0.00 692.78
DISTRICT NO. 2 - 499.31 2,102.92 2,167.40
DISTRICT NO. 3 - 110,034.68 20,153.82 1,993.35
DISTRICT NO. 5 - 3,407.61 273.28 265.83
DISTRICT NO. 6 - (446.33) 0.00 278.74
DISTRICT NO. 7 - 36.504.72 150,804.14 624.11
DISTRICT NO. 11 - (547.43) 160,948.44 516.69
DISTRICT NO. 13 - 2.55 0.00 73.43
DISTRICT NO. 14 - 47.13 0.00 186.28
DISTRICT NOS. 3 & 11 JOINT - 1,875.00 0.00 0.00
DISTRICT NOS. 5 &6 JOINT - 4,177.42 8,859.30 0.00
DISTRICT NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 2,202.90 0.00 0.00
DISTRICT NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 7,294.62 14.76 0.00
$3.877.540.35 1.833.903.E $40.353.17
DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES
A verbal report was represented by John Collins re the September 25, 1996 meeting.
MOTION: Receive and file draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on
August 28, 1996.
-5-
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Minutes
9/25/96
DRAFT PLANNING. DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES
Director Sheldon S. Singer, Chair of the Planning, Design, and Construction
Committee, gave a brief verbal report on the items being recommended for approval.
MOTION: Receive and file draft Planning, Design, and Construction Committee
Minutes for the meeting held on September 5, 1996, as corrected (per Item 14(e)).
JOB NO. P2-58 WITH GIERLICH-MITCHELL, INC. FOR GRIT AUGER
IMPROVEMENT AT PLANT NO. 2 (All Districts): The Engineering Department
requests authority to issue a purchase order for rehabilitation of grit auger at
Plant No. 2, for a total amount not to exceed $63,680.00. (PDC96-47)
MOTION: Authorize issuance of a purchase order for Job No. P2-58, Grit Auger
Improvement at Plant No. 2, to Gierlich-Mitchell, Inc. for design, manufacturing and
installation services, for a total amount not to exceed $63,680.00.
CHANGE ORDER NO. 4 TO JOB NO. P1-36-2 WITH MARGATE CONSTRUCTION
FOR SECONDARY TREATMENT IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 1 (All Districts):
The Construction Manager and Director of Engineering request approval of Change
Order No. 4 providing for seven items of additional work and four credit items.
(PDC96-42)
MOTION: Approve Change Order No. 4 to Job No. P1-36-2 with Margate Construction
for an addition of$24,733.00, increasing the total contract amount to $34,918,007.00.
PHASE II AND III OF THE STRATEGIC PLAN (All Districts): The Engineering
Department requests approval of professional services agreements for Phase II and
Phase III of the Strategic Plan for engineering services and preparation of a
Programmatic Environmental Impact Report. (PDC96-45)
MOTION: Authorize staff to solicit proposals and negotiate a Professional Services
Agreement for engineering services for Phase ll, Treatment, Reuse and Disposal
Facilities.
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Minutes
9/25/96
ADDENDUM NO. 3 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH LEE & RO
CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. FOR MODIFICATIONS TO ELECTRICAL AND
CONTROL SYSTEMS AND PROCESS EVALUATIONS AT PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO.
P1-40-1 AND MODIFICATIONS TO ELECTRICAL AND CONTROL SYSTEMS, AND
PROCESS EVALUATIONS AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-47-1 (All Districts): The
Engineering Department requests the approval of an addendum to the agreement
providing for additional engineering services and design changes. (PDC96-37)
MOTION: Approve execution of Addendum No. 3 to Professional Services Agreement
with Lee & Ro Consulting Engineers, Inc., in the amount of$76,801.00, for a total
amount not to exceed $1,247,967.00.
JOB NO. P1-40-2 (REBID). FACILITY MODIFICATIONS AND SAFETY UPGRADES AT
PLANT NO. 1. AND JOB NO. P2-47-2 (REBID). FACILITY MODIFICATIONS AND
SAFETY UPGRADES AT PLANT NO. 2 (All Districts): The Director of Engineering
requests that a construction contract be awarded re miscellaneous tasks for operational
and safety related improvements to the treatment plants. The PDC Committee and
Executive Committee reviewed the proposed actions by the Joint Boards at their
meeting of September 25, 1996 in response to a protest letter from Margate
Construction, Inc. protesting the bid of Pascal & Ludwig Engineers. (PDC96-49)
Doug Stewart, Engineering Manager, presented a brief history of the project, and
discussed the recommended actions.
General Counsel's Office responded to questions by Directors regarding legal issues.
MOTION: 1) Approve Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications correcting the
date for receipt of bids; 2) Receive and file letter dated August 21, 1996 from Margate
Construction, Inc. protesting the bid of Pascal and Ludwig Engineers; 3) Receive and
file memoranda from General Counsel dated September 10, 1996 and September 17,
1996; 4) Accept protest of Margate Construction, Inc., declaring Pascal and Ludwig
Engineers are ineligible to bid pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 5105;
5) Award contract to Margate Construction, Inc., second lowest bidder, for Job
Nos. P1-40-2 (Rebid) and P2-47-2 (Rebid), in a total amount of$1,900,000.00.
-7-
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Minutes
9/25/96
CHANGE ORDER NOS. 2 AND 3 TO CONTRACT NO. 3-36R. REPLACEMENT OF
WESTMINSTER AVENUE FORCE MAIN (FIRST UNIT) AND NEW WESTSIDE PUMP
STATION FORCE MAIN, WITH ALBERT W. DAVIES, INC.. AND NOTICE OF
COMPLETION (District 3): The Construction Manager and Director of Engineering
request approval of Change Order No. 2, providing six items of additional work and
granting a time extension of 25 calendar days for completion of said additional work;
approval of Change Order No. 3, providing for an adjustment of Engineer's estimated
quantities; and approve execution of the Final Closeout Agreement and filing of a
Notice of Completion. (PDC96-44)
MOTION: 1) Approve Change Order No. 2 to Contract No. 3-36R with Albert W.
Davies, Inc. for an addition of$31,301.55 and 25 calendar days; 2) Approve Change
Order No. 3, authorizing a net deduction of$42,216.00, decreasing the total contract
amount to $3,823,756.55; and 3) Approve execution of Final Closeout Agreement and
authorize filing of a Notice of Completion.
DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION, AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE
MINUTES: Director George Brown, Chair of the Finance, Administration, and Human
Resources Committee, gave a brief verbal report on the items being recommended for
approval.
MOTION: Receive and file draft minutes of the Finance, Administration, and Human
Resources Committee meeting held on September 11, 1996.
TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF JULY 1996 (FAHR96-49)
MOTION: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of July 1996.
ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE DISTRICTS' INVESTMENT POLICY (All Districts): The
Director of Finance requests revision of the Districts' Investment Policy Statement.
(FAHR96-51)
MOTION: 1) Receive and file Staff Report dated September 11, 1996; 2) Receive and
file Investment Policy approved by Finance, Administration and Human Resources
Committee on September 11, 1996; and 3) Adopt Resolution No. 96-79, adopting
Districts' investment policy, adopting investment performance reports and schedule of
frequency of investment performance reports, repealing Resolution Nos. 95-14, 95-15,
and 95-78, and rescinding minute order of the Boards of Directors of May 24, 1995.
-8-
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Minutes
9/25/96
ORDINANCE NO. 132, AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
PROVIDING FOR AN EARLY RETIREMENT INCENTIVE PROGRAM BY GRANTING
ADDITIONAL SERVICE CREDIT TO ELIGIBLE DISTRICTS' EMPLOYEES AS
AUTHORIZED BY THE COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT LAW OF 1937,
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 31641.04 (All Districts): The Director of Human
Resources, in conjunction with the FAHR Committee, requests that an Ordinance be
adopted providing for two additional years of service credit to eligible Districts'
employees who retire between January 1 and March 31, 1997, in accordance with
provisions of Government Code Section 31641.04. (FAHR96-52)
MOTION: 1) Read proposed Ordinance No. 132 by title only, and waive reading of
entire ordinance; and 2) Introduce Ordinance No. 132 and pass to second reading and
adoption at the October 23, 1996 Board Meeting.
PROPOSITION 218, RIGHT TO VOTE ON TAXES ACT (All Districts): The Chief
Administrative Officer (CAO) requests the Boards to declare their opposition to
Proposition 218. (FAHR96-54)
MOTION Approve FAHR Committee's recommendation taking no official position on
Proposition 218, and direct staff to continue gathering and distributing information
regarding potential impacts of the measure.
DRAFT EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MINUTES
Verbal report by John Collins, Chair of Executive Committee, re September 18, 1996
meeting.
MOTION: Receive and file draft Executive Committee Minutes for the meeting held on
September 18, 1996.
LAFCO APPLICATION FOR THE CONSOLIDATION OF THE COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY (All Districts): Staff requests approval by each
District of the LAFCO application for the consideration of the nine County Sanitation
Districts.
Judy Wilson, Assistant General Manager-Administration, provided the Directors with a
verbal report and slide presentation on the topic.
MOTION: Table the matter until January 1997.
-9-
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Minutes
9/25/96
GENERAL COUNSEL'S COMMENTS PRIOR TO CLOSED SESSION (All Districts):
General Counsel reported to the Directors the need for a closed session as authorized
by Government Code Sections 54956.9 and 54957.6 to discuss and consider the items
that are specified as Items 17(b)(1) through 17(b)(4) on the published agenda.
CONVENE IN CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS
54956.9(a) AND 54957.6 (All Districts): The Boards convened in closed session at
9:22 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9(a) and 54957.6.
Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Boards of Directors have been
prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are
maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of
Board and Committee Closed Meetings. No actions were taken re Agenda Item
Nos. 17(b)(1) through 17(b)(4).
RECONVENE IN REGULAR SESSION (All Districts): At 9:27 p.m., the Boards
reconvened in regular session.
ORDER ANNEXATION NO. 9 - CRYSTAL COVE STATE PARK(District No. 5): The
Director of Engineering requests approval of ordering annexation of a 20-acre portion
of Crystal Cove State Park known as the "Historic District', located on Pacific Coast
Highway north of the intersection of Sand Canyon Avenue.
MOTION: Adopt Resolution No. 96-80-5 ordering Annexation No. 9 - Crystal Cove
State Park to County Sanitation District No. 5.
ORDER ANNEXATION NO. 151 - GOODMAN ANNEXATION (District No. 71: The
Director of Engineering requests approval of ordering annexation of 1.01 acres of
unincorporated county territory south of the intersection of Lower Lake Drive and Lake
Court.
MOTION: Adopt Resolution No. 96-81-7 ordering Annexation No. 151 - Goodman
Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7.
-10-
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Minutes
9/25/96
APPROVE A NEW NEGOTIATED CONSENT DECREE RE U.S. GOVERNMENT V.
MONTROSE CHEMICAL CORPORATION, ET AL. (District No. 13): Consideration of
motion approving a new negotiated Consent Decree re U.S. Government v. Montrose
Chemical Corp., at al., at no cost to the Districts.
MOTION: Approve a new negotiated Consent Decreee re U.S. Government v.
Montrose Chemical Corp., at al., at no cost to the Districts.
ADJOURNMENTS (All Districts): The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at
9:27 p.m.
Secretary of Boards of irectors
of County Sa it Diqocts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14
_11_
FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 0820196 PAGE1
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID OS21I96 POSTING DATE 0821A18
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
153767 ACWA $150.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING
153768 API I ROMA INC $7,540.00 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
153769 ARMA INTERNATIONAL $585.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
153770 AT&T.CELLULAR CR&R $14.08 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
153771 A T&T-CELLULAR CR&R 54.71 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
153772 AWWANVOT CONFERENCE 580.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING
153773 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS 538,857.66 O&M AGREEMENT OKY GEN.SYST.M.0.8-9-09
153774 AKCENT $50.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
153775 AMERIDATA $28.721.98 OFFICE EOUIPMENT
153776 AMERICAN PAYROLL ASSOC. $590.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
153777 AMER.SOCIETY FOR MICROBIOLOGY $519.00 PUBLICATION
153778 BLAKE P.ANDERSON $91.83 REIMBURSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE
153779 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $041.62 NOTICES&ADS
153780 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT $1,071.13 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
153781 ATKIN/JONES COMPUTER SERVICE $321.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT
X 133782 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $3.695.15 PAYROLL SERVICES
2153783 AWARDS&TROPHIES $25.17 PLAQUES
W 153784 BFI MEDICAL WASTE SYSTEMS $47.40 WASTE DISPOSAL
.153785 E S BABCOCK&SONS INC $270.00 LAB ANALYSIS
-4 153786 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $373.35 BATTERIES
D 153787 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $422.00 TRUCK WASH TICKETS
I 153780 BIO-GRO DIVISION 569,99163 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 4-26-95
153789 BOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE 545.00 TRUCK REPAIRS
153790 BONA-RUES $156.55 TRUCK PARTS
153191 BOOT BARN $312.15 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES
153792 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $53.309.97 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7.18
153793 BOZNANSKI&CO.,INC. 54,500.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
153794 BUSH&ASSOCIATES,INC. 58,311.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.&8-94
153795 MICROBAC LABORATORIES,INC. $360.00 CONTRACT SERVICE
153796 CS COMPANY $64.39 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
153797 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE 5859A3 SERVICE AGREEMENT
153798 CALIF CENTRIFUGAL PUMP $1.650.00 PUMP PARTS
153799 CALIFORNIA LABORATORIES&DEV $4,372.25 MAINTENANCE
153800 CALIF RELOCATION SERVICES $209.00 RELOCATION
153801 CAMALI CORP. $1,300.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
153502 CANUS CORPORATION $5,200.00 FIBER OPTIC CABLE
153803 CAROLLO ENGINEERS $107.323.19 ENGINEERING SER. M.O.5�12-93,3-27-95,&24-95,8-23-95
153804 CASA $9,000.00 MEMBERSHIP FEES
153505 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $2,219.08 OFFICE FURNITURE
153806 CERFNET $20.00 COMPUTER SERVICES
153807 CETAC TECHNOLOGIES,INC. $284.65 LAB SUPPLIES
153808 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $150.39 SERVICE AGREEMENT
153809 COAST TRANSMISSION $200.35 AUTO SUPPLY
153810 COUCH&SONS $141,182.00 CONSTRUCTION 11-17-1
153811 COMPUSERVE $107.42 COMPUTER SERVICES
153812 CONNELL GM PARTS/DIV. $217.77 TRUCK PARTS
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0a/2D/96 PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 08/2IM POSTING DATE 080196
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
153813 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $1,408.78 ELECTRIC PARTS
153814 CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS $480.03 FREIGHT
153815 CONSUMER PIPE $36.47 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
153816 COOPER CAMERON CORP. 51,584.32 ENGINE PARTS
153817 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $134.27 TRUCK PARTS
153818 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $211.45 ELECTRIC PARTS
153819 CRANE PRO SERVICES $3.248.72 CRANE REPAIR
153820 CAL STATE UNIV FULLERTON $250.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
153821 DCC/CAL INC $1.196.03 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
153M J.W.D'ANGELO CO.,INC. $146.36 BUILDING MATERIALS
153823 DAY TIMERS INC. $32.85 SUBSCRIPTIONS
153824 DE GUELLE 9 SONS GLASS CO $510.55 SAFETY GLASS
153825 DELL MARKETING L.P. $3.232.50 COMPUTER
153826 DEL MAR ANALYTICAL $380.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
153827 DELTA PACKAGING PRODUCTS,INC. $154.30 LAB SUPPLIES
TTi 153828 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $1,011.22 PAINT SUPPLIES
X 153829 ESP NORTH $1,062.27 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
�—153830 EDWARDS DIV.OF GS BLDG SYS. $2.721.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
Lb 153531 ELECTRA-BOND,INC. $1,397.39 ROLLER BRACKET REPAIR
`-'153832 EMERGENCY MGMT NETWORK $2,405.00 CPWFIRST AID TRAINING
153833 ENCHANTER,INC. $3.500.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5.24-95
� 153834 FLUID TECH.SALES 5645.39 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
fJ 153835 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. 5346.25 AIR FREIGHT
153836 THE FEED BARN $527.97 BREAK AREA FURNITURE
153837 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $1.181.31 FILTERS
153838 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $1,135.27 LAB SUPPLIES
153839 FLO-SYSTEMS $202.69 PUMP PARTS
153840 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $43.63 PHOTO SUPPLIES
153841 FRAZEE PAINT&WALLCOVERING $97.75 PAINT SUPPLIES
153842 FRYS ELECTRONICS $2.735.82 ELECTRONIC&COMPUTER SUPPLIES
153843 GST,INC. $1,199.38 OFFICE SUPPLIES
1538" GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $1,77D.33 CHEMICALS
153845 GE IND B POWER SYSTEMS $3.790.14 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
153946 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $5,61KIAS TELEPHONE SERVICES
153847 THOMAS GRAY&ASSOC INC $624.00 LAB SERVICES
153848 DGA CONSULTANTS $1,366.00 ENGINEERING SER.M.O.641-94
153849 GRIFFIN CARRICK $9.128.06 LEGAL SERVICES-TECHITE M.O.9.27-95
153850 HLC BASSOC. $7,900.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
163851 HB TYPE B GRAPHICS $592.95 PRINTING
153852 PETER HASS $740.25 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
153853 HATCH&KIRK,INC. $39.18 TRUCK PARTS
153854 MIKE HERRERA $250.00 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
153855 HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT $2,083.33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN.
153856 HOLMES 8 NARVER,INC. $11,253.97 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-04
163857 HOME DEPOT $164.01 SMALL HARDWARE
153858 JILL HOWARD $636.20 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE OW20M PAGE 3
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 08121196 POSTING DATE 0521196
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
153859 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $81.77 PAINT SUPPLIES
153860 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $15.77 WATER USE
153851 HUNTINGTON AMCIJEEPIRENAULT $32.33 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS
153862 HUNTS FINAL PHASE $500.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
153863 HYCLONE LABORATORIES - 5674.53 LAB SUPPLIES
153864 IPCO SAFETY $14,706.55 SAFETY SUPPLIES
153865 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $571.97 CONNECTORS
153866 INDUSTRIAL WASTE $39.00 SUBSCRIPTION
153W7 INGERSOLL-RAND EQUIP CORP $12,068.00 COMPRESSOR
153868 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. $408.23 TRUCK PARTS
153869 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT 541.59 WATER USE
153870 JAMISON ENGINEERING 52,083.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
153871 JAY'S CATERING $1,359.06 DIRECTORS MEETING EXPENSE
153872 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $70.23 ELECTRIC PARTS
153873 KASBARA ENGINEERING $962.68 ENGINEERING SERVICE
X 153374 KEMIRON PACIFIC,INC. $47,711.74 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.9-27-95
= 153875 KERRY CONSULTING GROUP $4.102.95 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES M.O.IIAS-95
153876 KING BEARING,INC. $142.69 MACHINE SUPPLIES
153871 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $1.719.72 TOOLS
--1 153878 LA MOTTE CHEMICAL PRODUCTS $90.58 CHEMICALS
n 153879 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY CO. $1D5.01 SAFETY SUPPLIES
I 153880 IAMSON CORPORATION $214.62 FILTER
W 153881 LEE 8 RO CONSULTING ENGR. 532,402.67 ENGINEERING SERVICES M.O.5-24-95,5-12-93,12-8-93
153882 CHARLES G.LEE 5295.93 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
153583 LEWELLYN TECHNOLOGY,INC. $1,000.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
1538M LIMITORQUE CORP. $1.594.76 ELECTRIC PARTS
153885 K.P.LINDSTROM,INC. $10.286.32 ENVIR.CONSULTING SERVICES NO 12-9-90
153880 LOVE AT FIRST SITE&CO. $241.76 CATERING
153887 LYLE SCREENPRINTING $38.79 PICNIC EXPENSE
153888 MPS $266.33 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
153889 MAG SYSTEMS $345.82 INSTRUMENT PARTS
153890 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS,INC. 5482.81 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
153891 MAMCO INTERNATIONAL $506.86 JANITORAL SUPPLIES
153892 MARDEN SUSCO INC. $732.16 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
153893 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $46,694.03 CONSTRUCTION P2.42-2
153894 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $142.19 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
153895 MATT-CHLOR,INC. $944.46 FERRIC CHLORIDE SUPPLIES
153896 MCGARRY CENTRAL BUSINESS PROD $1,426.00 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
153891 DONALD F.MCINTYRE $107.90 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
153895 MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. $421.05 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
153599 MES COMPANY $988.07 REBUILD ROLLER BELT
153900 MINNESOTA WESTERN VISUAL PRES. $65.66 LAB SUPPLIES
153901 MISSION ABRASIVE SUPPLIES $478.41 WELDING SUPPLIES
153902 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3,367.95 UNIFORM RENTALS
153903 PETE MORRISON $855.23 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
1539M MORTON SALT $536.95 BOILER CONDITIONING
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE OB120196 PAGE 4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID OB121M POSTING DATE 08I2198
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
153905 NEWPORT EXTERMINATION 52,700.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
1539M HICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY SO.&22.83 LUBRICANTSIDIESEL FUEL
153907 NORCO DELIVERY SERVICE $98.20 MAIL DELIVERY SERVICE
153908 DAG FLIGHTDISK $1.044.54 SOFTWARE
153909 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $276.54 SAFETY GLASSES
153910 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $2.472.69 OFFICE SUPPLIES
153911 OMNI WESTERN INC. $12.61 HANDTOOLS
153912 ROBERTJ.00TON $775.23 MANAGEMENT TRAINING
153913 OPERATION TECHNOLOGY,INC. $1,605.47 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
153914 THE ORANGE COUNTY FORUM 880.00 MEMBERSHIP
153915 ORANGE COUNTY SEPTIC BERM. $3,172.00 PIPE REPAIR
153916 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $651.61 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
153917 ORTIZ FIRE PROTECTION $4.300.52 FIRE SPRINKLER REPAIR
153918 OXYGEN SERVICE $2,972.42 SPECIALTY GASES
153919 COUNTY OF ORANGE $55.000.00 DEPOSIT,AGREEMENT D95.107
M 153920 - COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $17.915.26 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP
X 153921 OCEMA $13,650.00 ENGINEERING SERVICE M.O.5-22-96
163922 PSI $567.07 STEAM CLEANING SERVICES
153923 PSSI $2.698.20 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION
.4 153924 PACIFIC INVESTMENT MGMT CO. $123.493.00 INVESTMENT MGMT.SERVICE RESOL.95-75
D 153925 PACIFIC PARTS $607.60 INSTRUMENT PARTS
1 1539M PACIFIC BELL W.05 TELEPHONE SERVICES
1- 153927 PACIFIC ENERGY ASSOC..INC. $300.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
153928 PADRE JANITORIAL SUPPLY $554.54 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
153929 PAPER SHOWCASE $24.95 TRAINING SUPPLIES
153930 PARTS UNLIMITED $11241 TRUCK PARTS
153931 PEDERSON COMMUNICATIONS $875.00 CABLE REPLACEMENT
153932 PERFORMANCE ANALYTICAL $545,00 LAB SERVICE
153933 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $1,008.01 REIMB.PETTY CASH
153934 PIMA GRID SYSTEMS,INC. $113.667.30 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3-29-95
153935 POLYPURE.INC. $49,417.36 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92
153936 PONTON INDUSTRIES,INC. $18,140.56 METERS
153937 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $208.00 ICE FOR SAMPLES
153938 PROMINENT FLUID CONTROL,INC. 82,39T00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL
153939 PRYOR RESOURCES,INC. $345.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
153940 PYRAMID FENCE COMPANY $723.00 FENCING INSTALLATION
153941 QUICKSTART TECHNOLOGIES $3,675.00 SOFTWARE
153942 R&R INSTRUMENTS $64.19 ELECTRIC PARTS
153943 REAL TIME SYSTEMS CDR $2.216,00 METER REPAIR
153944 RED WING SHOES $282.73 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES
153945 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DIST $279.63 ELECTRIC MOTOR
153946 THE REGISTER $1.975.20 NOTICES&ADS
153947 ROSEMOUNT ANALYTICAL,INC. $1,337.98 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
153948 S&J CHEVROLET $182.86 TRUCK REPAIRS
153949 SAWPA $35,000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
153950 SAREIS-PDC $200.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE OI20196 PAGE 5
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 0M27196 POSTING DATE 0821196
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
153951 SANTA ANA RIVER FLOOD $1,100.00 MEMBERSHIP
153952 SAWA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $110.48 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
153953 SARATOGA INSTITUTE,INC. $963.20 PUBLICATION
153954 SEA COAST DESIGNS $1.176.83 LAB SUPPLIES
153955 CITY OF SEAL BEACH $202.90 WATER USE
153956 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $732.70 TOOLS
153957 SHURELUCK SALES 12,250.53 TOOLSMARDWARE
153958 MIKE SILBERMANN EQUIP RENTAL $22,900.00 SEWER REPAIR
153959 SMITH-EMERY CO. $2,155.50 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-13-94
15396D SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP. $970.78 TOOLS
153961 SO CO AIR DUAL MAN DIST $4,940 00 CARD EMISSION FEES
153962 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY $32,580 68 ANNUAL EMMISSIONS FEES M.O.8.26.96
163963 SOUTH COAST WATER 5125.00 LAB SUPPLIES
153964 SO CALIF EDISON CO $5B4O40.37 POWER
153965 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $481.45 NATURAL GAS
M 153966 SPEX CERTIPREP INC. $326.37 LAB SUPPLIES
=153967 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION $350.00 UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE FEE
153968 SUMMIT STEEL $402.56 METAL
T!! 153969 SUNSET FORD $174.97 TRUCK PARTS
—1153970 SUPER POWER PRODUCTS $538.75 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
183971 SVERDRUP CIVIL INC. $350.578.20 CONSTRUCTION P2-35.3,PI-38-5,P246,P2-55
D1 153972 T&C INDUSTRIAL CONTROLS $1.830.70 ELECTRONIC PARTS
Un 153973 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $1.405.34 ELECTRIC CART PARTS
153974 TAYLOR INDUSTRIAL SOFTWARE $4.850,00 SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE
153975 THINK EARTH ENVIR ED.FOUND. $7,000.00 MEMBERSHIP
153976 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $1,386.16 MECHANICAL PARTS
153977 TONER SYSTEM INTERNATIONAL $2.803,49 PRINTER SUPPLIES
153978 TRANSCAT $694.93 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
153979 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $794A4 TRUCK PARTS
153980 JG TUCKER&SON, INC. $127.02 INSTRUMENT PARTS
153981 UNISPEC ENGINEERING 56,70963 CONTROL SUPPLIES
153982 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $585.93 PARCEL SERVICES
153983 VWR SCIENTIFIC $7,454.29 LAB SUPPLIES
153964 VALVATE ASSOCIATES $385.21 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
153985 VISION ENWRO SERVICES,INC. $9,989.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICE J-11-1-A
153986 WAL-CON CONSTRUCTION CO. $7.119.30 CONSTRUCTION 5.373
153987 WARREN GORHAM&LAMONT INC. $196.75 SUBSCRIPTION
153988 THE WASTEWATER CONNECTION $14.093.70 HERBICIDE
153989 WESTERN AIR $8,712.30 ENGINEERING SERVICE
153990 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $29.144.20 CAUSTIC SODA MO 8.23-95
153991 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL INC. $10.693.13 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE M.O.4.24-95
153992 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL $1,214.27 MURIATIC ACID RES.896.32
153993 XEROX CORP. $1.002.06 COPIER LEASES
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID OB121198 E7,831,903.81
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 0820M PAGES
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 0821196 POSTING DATE 062IMS
SUMMARY AMOUNT
02 OPER FUND $1.140.34
#2 CAP FAC FUND $962.58
#3 OPER FUND E70,785.76
#3 CAP FAC FUND $9,358.08
95 OPER FUND $273.28
#7 OPER FUND $42,494.17
97 CAP FAC FUND $108.309.97
Al I OPER FUND 57,986.20
#11 CAP FAC FUND $152,982.24
0586 CAP FAC FUND $8.859.30
#7914 OPER FUND $14.76
JT OPER FUND $523.972.97
CORF $704.668.80
m SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $19.998.59
X JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $242.106.62
x
ly 91,833,903.64
a
m
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 08M0 96 PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 08/07/96 POSTING DATE 08/07/98
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
163438 AM BEST COMPANY 511131 PUBLICATION
153439 A T&T-PRO WATTS $2.911.68 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
153440 A T&T-MEGACOM SERVICE $939.44 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
163"1 A T&T-CELLULAR CR&R $12.60 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
153442 A T&T-CELLULAR CR&R $1.26 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
153443 ABRASIVE ENO.TOOLING&EQUIP. $459.68 HARDWARE
153444 ACCU STANDARD $133.09 LAB SUPPLIES
153445 ADAMSON INDUSTRIES $62.41 LAB SUPPLIES
153446 AGSON INC. $109.50 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
153447 AIR LIQUIDE AMERICA CORP. $642.19 SPECIALTY GASSES
153448 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS 536,644.00 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.O.8.9419
153449 ALHAMBRA FOUNDRY CO LTD $6,368.03 MANHOLE FRAMES&COVERS
15345D AMERIDATA $6,12BA4 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
153451 AMERICAN AIRLINES $2,850.26 TRAVEL SERVICES
153452 AMERICAN SIGMA $3.247.14 LAB SUPPLIES
M ISM53 SLAKE P.ANDERSON $876.78 EXPENSE REIMB.
X 153454 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL $365.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
.ZC 153455 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $2,947.70 NOTICES&ADS
W 153456 AQUATIC BIOASSAY&CONSULTING $470.00 LAB SERVICES
153457 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE,INC. $2,198.00 TOXIC WASTE REMOVAL
153458 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. $60.OD WASTE OIL REMOVAL
Ce 153459 ASSOCIATED CONCRETE PRODUCTS $1.512.81 BUILDING MATERIALS
�. 153460 AMSA $500.00 PUBLICATIONS
153461 ATKIWJONES COMPUTER SERVICE $321.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT
153462 RANDOLPH AUSTIN CO. $690.62 LAB SUPPLIES
153463 AWARDS&TROPHIES $111.19 PLAQUES
153464 BFI MEDICAL WASTE SYSTEMS $5.50 WASTE DISPOSAL
153465 E S BABCOCK&SONS INC $1.350.00 LAB ANALYSIS
153466 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $1.199.29 BATTERIES
153467 BAUER COMPRESSOR $128.81 COMPRESSOR PARTS
153468 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $393.30 TRUCK WASH TICKETS
153469 B104RO DIVISION - $117,798A7 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 426-95
153470 BLACK&VEATCH $702.02 ENGINEERING SERVICES P146&P2-55
153471 BONA-RUES 5388.88 TRUCK PARTS
1534T2 BRANDALL MODULAR CORP $56,16TOO INFO.TECH.TRAILER MO 4-24-96
153473 BROOKS INSTRUMENT DIV. $236.98 INSTRUMENT
153474 BUDGET JANITORIAL $3,33000 JANITORIAL SERVICES MO 1.12-94
153475 BUSH&ASSOCIATES,INC. $840.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6$94
153476 BUSINESS ENTERPRISE $1,450.00 REGISTRATION
153477 CH2M HILL $75.532.09 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-31
153478 MICROBAC LABORATORIES $720.00 GAS ANALYSIS SERVICES
153479 C P&R CATALOG ORDER DEPT $55.00 PUBLICATION
153480 CS COMPANY $90.25 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
153481 - CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH 5628.72 LAB SUPPLIES
153492 CALTROL,INC. $1,01129 HARDWARE
153483 CALIF ASSOC.OF SAN.AGENCIES $640.00 WORK CONFERENCE REGISTRATION
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 08/05196 PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 08/07196 POSTING DATE 08/07196
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
153484 CALIFORNIA JOURNAL INC $37.95 SUBSCRIPTION
153485 CALIF SOCIETY OF MUNICIPAL $60.00 REGISTRATION
153488 CAMP DRESSER&MC KEY INC $l12,297.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES
153457 CANUS CORPORATION $58,354.12 FIBER OPTIC CABLE
153488 CAPITALWESTWARD $561.99 MECHANICAL PARTS
153409 CAROLLO ENGINEERS $34,686.04 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI38,P243.3
153490 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $7,667.26 OFFICE FURNITURE
153491 CENTURY SAFETY INST.&SUPPLY $222-16 SAFETY SUPPLIES
153492 CHAPMAN COUNSELING $3,600.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING
153493 CLEAN SOURCE $156.41 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
153494 COMMUNICATIONS PERFORMANCE GROUP $10,000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
153495 COMPUTERS AMERICA 52,116.23 PRINTER SUPPLIES
153496 CONNECTOR TECHNOLOGY,INC. $116.33 PERMIT CANCELLATION REFUND
153497 CONNELL GM PARTS/DIV. $42.75 TRUCK PARTS
153498 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $4.620.67 ELECTRIC PARTS
X 153499 ' CONSUMER PIPE $449.24 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
= 153500 CONTINENTAL EQUIPMENT&SUPPLY $3,222.06 TOOLS
'--' 153501 CONTRACTORS EQUIPMENT CO $95.62 AUTO PARTS
b 153502 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS OC $15,745.25 CONSULTING SERVICES M.0.8-11-93
—1153503 COUNTY CLERK 538.00 CEQA FILING FEE
Dy 153504 CA DEPT OF HEALTH SERVICES $3.527.00 ELAP CERTIFICATION FEE
1 153505 JAMES DARLINGTON $150.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
N 153506 ALBERT W.DAVIES,INC. $3.219.34 REMOVE TECHITE PIPE
153507 TOM DAWES $428.00 EXPENSE REIMS.
153W8 DELL MARKETING L.P. $30.17 COMPUTER PARTS
153509 DEL MAR ANALYTICAL $190.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
153510 DIAMOND LINERS INC $387,67 TRUCK BED LINERS
153511 THE DICKSON COMPANY $161.Co LABSUPPUES
153512 DIETERICH-POST CO. $563.14 INSTRUMENT PARTS
153513 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $835.52 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
153514 MICHAEL F DILLON $6,024,50 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
153515 DOUBLETREE INN OF MONTEREY $298.0D ROOM RESERVATION FOR CASA CONK
153516 ROBERT F.DRIVER ASSOC. $125,000.00 EXCESS LIABILITY INSURANCE MO 5.13.92,640A2
153517 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $999.26 PAINT SUPPLIES
153518 THE ECONOMICS PRESS,INC. $45.50 SUBSCRIPTION
153519 EMA/ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES $19.91 PUBLICATION
153520 ENS RESOURCES $2,808.29 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
153521 ESP NORTH $774.77 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
153522 ELCAN TECHNOLOGIES CORP $166.20 TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT
153523 ELECTRA-BOND,INC. $619.56 PUMP REPAIR
153524 EMERGENCY MGMT NETWORK $2,560.00 CPRIFIRSTAIDTRAINING
153525 ENCHANTER,INC. $5,600.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5-24-95
153526 FST SAND AND GRAVEL,INC. $262.40 ROAD BASE MATERIALS
153527 - FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $671.20 AIR FREIGHT
153528 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $597.95 FILTERS
153529 FIRST CHOICE $759.72 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 08105196 PAGE 3
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 08107/96 POSTING DATE 08107198
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
153530 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $7,86048 LAB SUPPLIES
153531 FISONS INSTRUMENTS $23.054.70 SERVICE AGREEMENT
153532 FLO-SYSTEMS $1,374.05 PUMP PARTS
153533 FORD SAWAJOT MGMT GROUP $2,304.48 CONSOLIDATION SERVICES
153534 FORKERT ENGINEERING B SURVEY $2.628.35 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES NO 64MM
153535 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $114.95 PHOTO SUPPLIES
153536 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $17,609.48 WATER USE
153537 THE FOXBORO CO. $1,720.38 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
153538 FRANKLIN QUEST CO. $5,822.15 TIME MANAGEMENT TRAINING
153539 FRY'S ELECTRONICS $3,148.99 ELECTRONIC&COMPUTER SUPPLIES
153540 CRY OF FULLERTON $292.26 WATER USE
153541 GST,INC. $1.541.72 OFFICE SUPPLIES
153542 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $541.23 LUMBERMARDWARE
153543 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $290.93 CHEMICALS
153544 GATES FIBERGLASS INSTALLERS $1,931.00 EMERGENCY TANK REPAIR
M 163545 - GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $4.982.21 TELEPHONE SERVICES
= 153546 GIERUCH-MITCHELL,INC. $2,267.57 PUMP PARTS
153547 WAN GRAINGER,INC. $1.409.96 COMPRESSOR PARTS
� 1535/6 GRABBY S.T.I. $3,802.52 ENGINE PARTS
-I 153549 GRAYBAR $1.228.05 COMPUTER SUPPLIES
tz 163550 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $239.47 PRINTING SERVICES
I 153551 DGA CONSULTANTS $16.692.50 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.64494
W 153552 HB TYPE 8 GRAPHICS $3.909.17 PRINTING
163553 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $333.91 TRUCK PARTS
153554 HARBOR TRUCK BODY $989.14 TRUCK PARTS
153555 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $352.88 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
153556 HATCH 8 KIRK,INC. $5,036.73 TRUCK PARTS
153557 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS $4,228.20 CONTAINER RENTALS
153558 RC HOFFMAN ANDIOR ISCO $161.12 LAB SUPPLIES
153559 HOME DEPOT $152.06 SMALL HARDWARE
153560 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $1,016.72 PAINT SUPPLIES
153561 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $11.168.05 WATER USE
153562 I D P $275.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
153563 IPCO SAFETY S4,919.72 SAFETY SUPPLIES
153564 INDUSTRIAL STEAM $375.63 PUMP
153565 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $1.076.00 CONNECTORS
153566 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. $26.90 TRUCK PARTS
153567 IBM CORPORATION#2899757 $348.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
153568 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $877.41 BATTERIES
153569 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $76.82 WATER USE
153570 J2 PRINTING SERVICES $645.50 PRINTING
153571 JAMISON ENGINEERING $12,898.26 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
153572 JANDEL SCIENTIFIC $173.55 SOFTWARE
153573 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $801.53 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
153574 JAY'S CATERING $86.40 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE
163575 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO. $309.40 GAUGE
FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 08/05/96 PAGE4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID M07/96 POSTING DATE 08/07/96
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
153576 JONES&ATTWOOD/WASTE TECH $1.000.00 FREIGHT FOR FSM MACHINE FOR TESTING
153577 KMI INDUSTRIES $164.70 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
153578 FRANCES L KALUZNY $65D.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
153579 KEMIRON PACIFIC,INC. $60,078.84 FERRIC CHLORIDE M09.27-95
153580 KERRY CONSULTING GROUP $7,375.11 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES NO 11.1&95
1535BI KEWAUNEE SCIENTIFIC CORP. $113.24 WORKBENCH
153582 KING BEARING,INC. $1,749.77 MACHINE SUPPLIES
153583 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $5.061.15 TOOLS
153584 KOPYKAT $6&20 MEDICAL RECORDS
153565 LSI NORTH AMERICAN SERVICE $297.00 INSTRUMENT REPAIR
153586 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $1,860.62 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICE
153557 LAIDLAW ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES $13,034,03 HAZARDOUS MATERIAL DISPOSAL
153588 LAW/CRANDAL,INC. $4,955.00 SOIL TESTING 7-13-94
153589 ORANGE COUNTY DIVISION $500.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES
153590 LOCALAGENCY $950.00 ANNEXATION FEE
ITI 153591 LYLE SCREENPRINTING $914.31 PICNIC SHIRTS
x 153592 MPS $101.78 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
_x
157583 MACOMCO E928.20 SERVICE AGREEMENT
to 153694 MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY CORP. $5N.87 WELDING SUPPLIES
—1 153595 MANHOLE ADJUSTING $5,625.00 ADJUST MANHOLE FRAMES&COVERS
Lb 153596 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION INC $1.392,293.00 CONSTRUCTION PI-30.2
1 153597 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION INC $245,949.84 CONSTRUCTION P141
t 153598 MARTIN&SHIRLEY BURNS $75.00 PERMIT REFUND
153599 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $175.10 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
153600 MC AFEE ASSOCIATES $10,255.25 SOFTWARE LICENSE
153601 MCBAIN INSTRUMENTS $660.00 LAB SUPPLIES
153602 DONALD F.MCINTYRE $1.006.97 EXPENSE REIMB.
153603 MC JUNKIN CORP $5,853.28 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
153604 MELLON TRUST $16,481.87 COP TRUST SERVICES
153605 MESA MUFFLER $257.79 TRUCK PARTS
153606 METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT $696.00 MEMBERSHIP
153607 METTLER TOLEDO,INC. $3,323.23 SCALE REPAIR
153608 MICROFLEX MEDICAL CORP $1.088.00 SAFETY SUPPLIES
153609 MIDWAY MFG.&MACHINING $9,083.23 MECHANICAL REPAIRS
IS3610 MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES CO $300.06 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
153611 MISSION ABRASIVE SUPPLIES $130m SAFETY GLASS
153612 MISSION INDUSTRIES $2.974.87 UNIFORM RENTALS
ISM13 ISIAH MITCHELL $145.41 EXPENSE REIMB.
153814 MONITOR LABS $77.68 INSTRUMENT
153615 MORELAND&ASSOCIATES $5,125.00 AUDITING SERVICES M0341-95
153616 MOTOROLA.INC. $13.201.53 INSTRUMENT PARTS
153617 NASCO $501.43 VALVE
153618 NAT WEST MARKETS $750.00 COP INTEREST DRAW FEES
153619 STANDARD REF.MATL.PROGRAM $1.912.00 LAB SUPPLIES
ISM20 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES $8.742.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES
153621 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $102.27 SAFETY FILM RENTALS
a .,
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 08/05196 PAGE 5
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 08/07196 POSTING DATE 08/07/96
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
153622 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $725.58 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
153623 NEW HERMES INC $10.368.75 ENGRAVER
153624 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH S45.64 WATER USE
153625 HICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY $4,877.65 LUBRICANTS/DIESEL FUEL
153626 NORTH HILLS COIN-OP LAUNDRY $142.70 PERMIT REFUND
153627 OC-ASTD $385.00 MEMBERSHIP
153628 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $8,273.73 OFFICE SUPPLIES
153629 OMNI WESTERN INC $63.03 TOOLS
153630 ORANGE COUNTY FARM SUPPLY $931.45 CHEMICALS
153631 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $334.63 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
153632 ORANGE VALVE 8 FITTING CO. $2,027.78 FITTINGS
153633 ORITEX CORP $1.536.35 MECHANICAL PARTS
153634 OXYGEN SERVICE $2252.31 SPECIALTY GASES
153635 COUNTY OF ORANGE $1.050.00 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE
153636 COUNTY OF ORANGE $751.15 OVERAPPORTIONMENT REFUND
R1153637 -ORANGE COUNTY FORUM 525.00 MANAGEMENTLUNCHEON
=153638 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT $37,789,40 GAP WATER USE M.O.6-9-93
1MS39 PBD CONSULTANTS INC $892.04 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
w 153640 PSI $75.43 HARDWARE
153641 PSOC(POOL SUPPLY OF OC) $452.45 OPERATING SUPPLIES
tp112 PSSI $11,522.00 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION
153643 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $661.10 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
111 153644 PACIFIC BELL $1.304.76 TELEPHONE SERVICES
153645 PADRE JANITORIAL SUPPLY $2,968.52 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
153646 PARKER HANNIFIN CORP. $475.03 MECHANICAL PARTS
153647 PARKHOUSE TIRE,INC. $1,568.84 TIRES
153648 PARTS UNLIMITED $945.92 TRUCK PARTS
153649 PATRIOT VIDEO PRODUCTIONS $519.D0 VIDEO TAPING SERVICE
153650 PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION $28,587.16 LAB SUPPLIES
153651 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $531.51 REIMS.PETTY CASH
153652 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $102,335.40 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.349-95
153653 POLYPURE,INC. $14.624.75 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92
153654 POWER DESIGN $943.89 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS
153655 POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO. $397.38 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
153656 POWER SYSTEMS $570.40 MAINTENANCE
153657 PRENTICE HALL $37.97 PUBLICATION
153658 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $336.00 ICE FOR SAMPLES
153659 PULSAFEEDER $499.79 PUMP PARTS
153660 OUICKSTART TECHNOLOGIES $1,050.00 CONSULTING SERVICES
153661 SIN GROUP,INC. $9.000.00 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
153662 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $693.10 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS
153663 R 8 R INSTRUMENTS $671.14 ELECTRIC PARTS
153664 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $2,002.72 TRASH REMOVAL
153665 REBIS $6,000.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
153666 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DIST $70.27 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
153667 THE REGISTER 5844.68 NOTICES 6 ADS
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 08/05/96 PAGE 6
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID O8107196 POSTING DATE 00/071%
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
153668 ROSEN'S ELECTRIC $546.50 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
153669 SKCWEST $101.31 SAFETY SUPPLIES
153670 SPSS,INC $862.00 SOFTWARE
153671 BANDON ENGINEERING,INC. $750.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES
153672 SARBS-CWEA-PDC,INC. $500.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
153673 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTL $325,422.33 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.64.94
153674 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $636.80 SPECIALTY GASES
153675 SEA COAST DESIGNS $12.93 LAB SUPPLIES
153676 SEA WATER VISIONS $803.40 COOLER
153677 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $4.115.03 TOOLS
153678 SHASTAELECTRIC $267,344.00 CONSTRUCTION J-31-2
153679 SHORE PERSONNEL SERVICES $10,000.00 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
153680 SHURELUCKSALES $8.295.65 TOOLS/HARDWARE
153681 SIEVERS INSTRUMENTS INC. $1,800.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
m 153682 SKILL PATH SEMINARS $99.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
X 153683 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $290.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS
s 153684 SMITH-EMERY CO. $1,934.00 SOIL TESTING M.0.7-13-94
153685 SMITH PIPE&SUPPLY $736.65 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
153686 SO CALIF EDISON CO $50,936.74 POWER
153687 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $2,239.41 NATURAL GAS
LA 153688 SOUTHERN CALIF GAS COMPANY $15,450.00 CONSTRUCTION PI-51
153689 SOUTHERN CALIF TRANE SERVICE $10,059.00 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
153690 SPARLING INSTRUMENT CO.,INC. $115.10 METER
153691 SPEX CERTIPREP INC. $68.78 LAB SUPPLIES
153692 STANDARD SUPP&EQUIP CO $305.80 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
163693 STATE CHEMICAL MANUFACTURING $1,290.32 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
153694 STERLING ART $238.78 ART SUPPLIES
153695 SUMMIT STEEL $110.34 METAL
153696 SUNSET FORD $125.37 TRUCK PARTS
153697 SUPELCO,INC. $539.69 LAB SUPPLIES
153698 SUPER CHEM CORP. $2,009.65 CHEMICALS-
153699 SYMCAS $1.476.00 CONSULTING SERVICES
153700 SYSCOM INC $2,036.54 HUMAN RESOURCES TRAINING
153701 MAHIN TALEBI $565.92 EXPENSE REIMS.
153702 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $377.91 ELECTRIC CART PARTS
153703 TEXAS ANALYTICAL CONTROLS $604.06 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS
153704 THEODORE ROBBINS FORD $248.96 VEHICAL RENTAL
153705 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $2422.94 MECHANICAL PARTS
153706 TIME WARNER COMMUNICATIONS $41.28 CABLE SERVICES
153707 TONYS LOCK&SAFE SERVICE $292.96 LOCKS&KEYS
153708 EDWARD M.TORRES $223.92 EXPENSE REIMS.
153709 TOSHIBA INTERNATIONAL $1,203.62 INSTRUMENT PARTS
153710 TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY,INC. $15.742.68 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.0.5-11-94
153711 TRUESDAIL LABS $6,188.00 LAB SERVICES
153712 JG TUCKER&SON,INC. $443.94 INSTRUMENT PARTS
153713 US POSTAL SERVICE $5,000.00 POSTAGE
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE OW05196 PAGE 7
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 08107M POSTING DATE 08107M
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
153714 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $396.00 LAB SUPPLIES
153715 UNISOURCEWOR BUTLER PAPER f WAT OFFICE SUPPLIES
153716 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $639.10 PARCEL SERVICES
153717 VWR SCIENTIFIC $4.602.87 LAB SUPPLIES
153718 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $351.66 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
153719 VERNE'S PLUMBING $205.00 PLUMBING SERVICES
153720 VERTEX SYSTEMS $2,363.01 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT
153721 WACKENHUT CORP. 511,867.32 CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS
153722 WAL-CON CONSTRUCTION CO. $7,141.12 CONSTRUCTION
153723 CARL WARREN 8 CO. $4,081.53 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR
153724 WASTE MARKETS $12.226.03 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 3.27-96
153725 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $17,774.50 CAUSTIC SODA MO 8.23-95
153726 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $1,959.50 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE MO 4-24-95
153727 WESTERN WHOLSALE CO $85.91 TRUCK SUPPLIES
f1l 153728 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $732.42 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
X 153729 WESCO DISTRIBUTION INC. $1,595.78 INSTRUMENT PARTS
2 153730 CHARLES F.WINSOR $515.00 EXPENSE REIMS.
153731 WITEG $765.03 LAB SUPPLIES
1537M ROURKE.WOODRUFF B SPRADLIN $47,705.33 LEGAL SERVICES MO 7-26-95
-4 153T33 WORDPERFECT $.55.94 SUBSCRIPTIONS
Lp 153734 XEROX CORP. 523,326.91 COPIER LEASES
1 153735 2YMARK CORP. $1.513.50 LAB EQUIPMENT
V
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 08107/96 $3.877,540.35
FUND NO 9199 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 08105/96 PAGE 8
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID O8/07/96 POSTING DATE OW7196
SUMMARY AMOUNT
01 OPER FUND $60.D0
01 CONST FUND ($996.30)
02 OPER FUND $4,970.20
02 CAP FAC FUND $892.04
02 CONST FUND ($5,362.93)
03 OPER FUND $32.626.13
03 CAP FAC FUND $64,582.59
03 CONST FUND $12,825.96
05 OPER FUND $4.857.72
05 CONST FUND ($1,450.11)
06 CAP FAC FUND $200.00
06 CONST FUND ($646.37)
07 OPER FUND $31,363.77
07 CAP FAC FUND $6.667.00
X 07 CONST FUND ($1,726.05)
= 011 OPER FUND $35721
�-I 911 CAP FAC FUND $260.00
t" 011 CONST FUND ($1,160.64)
--1 013 CONST FUND $2.55
CU 014 OPER FUND $32.13
I 014 CONST FUND $15,00
CD 03911 OPER FUND $1,875.00
0596 OPER FUND $3,186,08
0586 CAP FAC FUND $991.34
0687 OPER FUND $2.202.90
07814 OPER FUND $1,294.62
JT OPER FUND $1,040,405.06
CORF $2.301,318.40
SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $133.819.56
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $237.881.45
$3,877,640.35
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE-VARIOUS PAGE1 V
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID-MISCELLANEOUS HANDWRITE WARRANTS
WARRANTDATE WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
0822/96 153994 CALL AMERICA INC $90.10 CELLULAR PHONE REIMB.
08/22/98 153995 DOUGLAS STEWART $635.00 EXPENSE REIMB.
08/27/96 154014 TRI-STATE SEMINAR $270.00 REGISTRATION
O827196 154015 WEFTEC'95 $940.00 REGISTRATION
0828196 154016 KNOTT'S BERRY FARM $1.503.50 DISCOUNTTICKETS
O81=96 154236 TRFSTATE SEMINAR ON-THE-RIVER $210.00 REGISTRATION
09/05196 154237 THE BALBOA BAY CLUB $3.314.70 NEWPORT SPILL-ANDERSON
09/05196 154238 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE $6,798.61 MEDICARE ADJUSTMENT
09K15196 154239 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $19.691.26 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP
09/05/98 154240 R.CRAIG SCOTT&ASSOC. $7,00D.00 EXPERT WITNESS RETAINER FEE
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID $40,353.17
m
X SUMMARY AMOUNT
2
W R1 OPER FUND $892.78
$2 OPER FUND $2.167.40 -
93 OPER FUND $1.993.35
n 95 OPER FUND $265.83
I , 96 OPER FUND $278.74
07 OPER FUND $624.11
811 OPER FUND $616.69
013 OPER FUND $73.43
#14 OPER FUND $186.28
JT OPER FUND $2,618.50
SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $29,905.96
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $1,030A0
$40,353.17
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
) SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, I hereby certify that
the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7,
11, 13 and 14 held on was duly posted for public
inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on 19, 19 9lP
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this /f�day of
Penny Kyle, Se et ry of of the
Boards of Direct of C ty Sanitation
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14
of Orange County, California
BSFamsIF21A
AGENDA & SCHEDULE
TOPIC: PRELIMINARY FINDINGS ON PROJECTS 1 AND 2
OF OUR STRATEGIC PLAN
AN INFORMATIONAL WORKSHOP FOR THE
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
108" ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708
SEPTEMBER 21, 1996 - 9:00 A.M. - 12 NOON
CALL TO ORDER
9,00 a.m. - 9:05 a.m. Coffee
9:05 a.m. - 9:15 a.m. Welcome
— John Collins ,
— Don McIntyre..
9:15 a.m. - 10:15 a.m. Preliminary Results
of Ocean Outfall Investigation
— Dave Ludwin
10:15 a.m. - 10:30 a.m. Break
10:30 a.m. - 11:20 a.m. Proposed Alternatives
for Managing Peak Flows
— Larry Roesner, CDM
11:20 a.m. - 11:50 a.m. The Relationship Between
Projects 1 & 2, and
the Decision-Making Process
— Blake Anderson
11:50 a.m. - 12:00 noon Wrap Up
— Don McIntyre
ADJOURN
JAW PDOCICOMMSE0921AGEND
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
F
September 16, 1996
phone:
(714)962-2411
call eadres°: Dear Fellow Board Member:
P.G.Box B127
Fountain Valle,CA
92728 B12J
I believe we can all agree that a primary responsibility of the Boards of
streetA ne:
t GB44 Ellis Directors is to establish "policy" for our organization. Much of the policy for
Ellie Avenue
Fountain Valley.CA the Sanitation Districts will be found in our new Strategic Plan.
927G8-7G18
Board members must be involved extensively in the planning process if we
are to assume proper"ownership" of the plan and oversee the
Member implementation of its goals and objectives in the future.
Agencies
0 Within the next several months, we will be asked to make many decisions
close that will have a profound impact on the operation of the Sanitation Districts for
ananaim at least the next decade. One decision alone could cost as much as $200
at. Perk million. Before we can make informed decisions we need to understand the
cycraS6 operational process and alternatives to solving the challenges that stand in
Fountain Valley
Fullerton the way of the Sanitation Districts accomplishing its mission.
Huntington Beach
Irvine
Le Habra Our third Strategic Planning Workshop from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. on
La Pnlma Las Ale Saturday, September 21, is designed to provide us with more essential
al
Newport Basch Grange background information for making informed decisions. Specifically, staff will
Placentia present the results of our ocean ouffall investigation and the various
Sense Ana
Beal Beach alternatives to better manage peak flows.
Stanton
Tustin
Vale Park I want to personally urge you to attend this important meeting. For further
Yorba Linda information or to RSVP, please call Michelle Tuchman, Director of
County o1 Grange Communications, 962-2411, ext. 2050.
Sanitary Districts Sincerely,
Ccete Mess
Gorden Grove
Midway City
Water Districts
hn C fins
Irvine Panch
oint Chair
JC:MT
J:IWPDOCITUCHMAN\egsWRKSH
A Public Wastewater and Environmental Management Agency Committed to Protecting ti,a Environment Since 1954
AGENDA & SCHEDULE
TOPIC: PRELIMINARY FINDINGS ON PROJECTS 1 AND 2
OF OUR STRATEGIC PLAN
AN INFORMATIONAL WORKSHOP FOR THE
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708
SEPTEMBER 21, 1996 - 9:00 A.M. - 12 NOON
CALL TO ORDER
9:00 a.m. - 9:05 a.m. Coffee
9:05 a.m. - 9:15 a.m. Welcome
-- John Collins
-- Don McIntyre
9:15 a.m. - 10:15 a.m. Preliminary Results
of Ocean Ouffall Investigation
10:15 a.m. - 10:30 a.m. Break
10:30 a.m. - 11:20 a.m. Proposed Alternatives
for Managing Peak Flows
11:20 a.m. - 11:50 a.m. The Relationship Between
Projects 1 and 2
11:50 a.m. - 12:00 noon Wrap Up
ADJOURN
J'.WVPDOCNCOMMSECIS21AGEND
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
September 16, 1996
phone:
(714)962-2411
marling address: Dear Fellow Board Member:
P.O. 9m 612J
Fountain Valle,CA
927288127
I believe we can all agree that a primary responsibility of the Boards of
e Os Avenue aaee
iC6M ell Directors is to establish "policy"for our organization. Much of the policy for
Fauresin Valley,cA the Sanitation Districts will be found in our new Strategic Plan.
92708-7016
Board members must be involved extensively in the planning process if we
are to assume proper"ownership" of the plan and oversee the
Member implementation of its goals and objectives in the future.
Agencies
0 Within the next several months, we will be asked to make many decisions
Cities that will have a profound impact on the operation of the Sanitation Districts for
Anaheim at least the next decade. One decision alone could cost as much as $200
are.
Buena Park million. Before we can make informed decisions we need to understand the
Cypreas operational process and alternatives to solving the challenges that stand in
Fountein Valley
Fullerton the way of the Sanitation Districts accomplishing its mission.
Huntington Beach
Irvine
La Habre Our third Strategic Planning Workshop from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. on
Lo Palma
Las Alamitos Saturday, September 21, is designed to provide us with more essential
Newport Beech background information for making informed decisions. Specifically, staff will
orange 9 9 P Y.
Returns present the results of our ocean outfall investigation and the various
Santa Ana
Baal Beach alternatives to better manage peak flows.
Stanton
Made
Villa Park I want to personally urge you to attend this important meeting. For further
raroa Lind. information or to RSVP, please call Michelle Tuchman, Director of
County of Orange Communications, 962-2411, ext. 2050.
sanitary Districts Sincerely,
Caste Mesa
Garden Grove
Midway oty
Water Districts
hn C Ilins
Irvine Ranch
oint Chair
JC:MT
J'1VJPD0CMCHMAM9%MKSH
A Public Wastewater and EnWronmencal Management Agency Committed to Protecting the Environment Since 1854
AGENDA & SCHEDULE
TOPIC: PRELIMINARY FINDINGS ON PROJECTS 1 AND 2
OF OUR STRATEGIC PLAN
AN INFORMATIONAL WORKSHOP FOR THE
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708
SEPTEMBER 21, 1996 - 9:00 A.M. - 12 NOON
CALL TO ORDER
9:00 a.m. - 9:05 a.m. Coffee
9:05 a.m. - 9:15 a.m. Welcome
John Collins
Don McIntyre
9:15 a.m. - 10:15 a.m. Preliminary Results
of Ocean Outfall Investigation
10:15 a.m. - 10:30 a.m. Break
10:30 a.m. - 11:20 a.m. Proposed Alternatives
for Managing Peak Flows
11:20 a.m. - 11:50 a.m. The Relationship Between
Projects 1 and 2
11:50 a.m. - 12:00 noon Wrap Up
ADJOURN
J1W PD0000MMSEC1921AGEND
i
t'
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC)
Strategic Plan Workshop No. 3
Saturday, September 21, 1996
The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County is beginning Phase I of our new Strategic
Plan. Three projects comprise Phase 1:An investigation and repair of our ocean outfall;a study
of our wastewater collection system and ways to better manage peak flows;and the
determination of an equitable financial program of sewer connection fees and annual user
charges. We anticipate it will take approximately 18 months to complete these three projects.
The following will give you an overview of Phase I projects as background information for our
Strategic Plan Workshop No.3.
Investigation and Repair of Ocean Outfall
This project includes the investigation and repair of the Districts'primary ocean outfall,a 120-
inch,5-mile outfall pipe and diffuser,and repair of the Districts'1-mile emergency 78•inch
outfall. The work will include recommendations,final plans,specifications and contract
documents to rehabilitate and repair known items,and items needing attention which may be
discovered during the investigation phase. Our outfall,which is 25 years old,is half way
through its 50-year design life and a tune-up is the most cost-effective way to insure continued
reliability. Also included in this work is the investigation of various means to increase the
capacity of the outfall system. The work will explore extending the diffuser,building larger
diffusion ports,a planned opening of the end gate,use of the emergency 78-inch outfall and
cleaning of the primary outfall. Permits and regulatory approvals will be necessary to proceed
with recommended work. Some of the issues on hand are:
- Inspection of the 120-inch outfall,including 5 miles of ballast,and the cleaning of
the 120-inch outfall
- Opening plugged ports
- Analyzing options to increase hydraulic capacity
- Repairing the 78-inch outfall
Management of Peak Hydraulic Discharge
This project includes determining average daily and peak wastewater flows,and ways to better
manage peak flow,in order to delay or negate the need for a second operating ocean outfall.
The cities and agencies we serve will be contacted to gather information on land use,
population,condition of city sewers and other necessary information. Population forecasts will
include gathering data from many agencies and individuals. An inflow and infiltration study
(1&1),as well as sewer monitoring,will be conducted to validate generation rates and to
determine cost�effeclive ways to reduce storm-related peak events. An interim flow
management plan,including an operators manual and training on influent and effluent
q
pumping,are also included. Finally,the many alternatives identified will be narrowed through
a decision model process conducted with our Boards of Directors, staff, the cities we serve,rate
payers and other special interest groups. Some of the highlights of this project include:
Collect data on land use and sewer conditions from member agencies
Conduct I&I study
Determine sewer conveyance system deficiencies and recommend improvements
Identify flow reduction techniques
prepare an interim pumping plan and conduct training
Conduct a decision model process
Determination of Financial Charges and Fee Schedules
This project will build on the project listed above by sharing and using the same land use data.
The object is to create one-time connection and annual user charges that closely approximate the
cost of service. Some of the issues that will be explored in this study include:
- How to improve customer convenience
- Determine fair charges for users based on the type of use proposed for the
facilities
- Working with various business-related organizations to develop equitable and
fair charges
- Conducting a decision model which would include members of the Orange
County business community
- Recommending revisions to our source control ordinance to increase fairness of
the connection fees
N
Rate Advisory Committee List
September 17, 1996
1) Bob Lockhart, President
Revenue Enhancement Group
801 E. Katella Avenue, Suite 200
Anaheim, CA 92805
2) Rick Chapler, Dir. of Property Operations
Hotel/Motel Association of California
c/o Anaheim Hilton &Towers
777 Convention Way
Anaheim, CA 92802
3) Sam Olivito
Western Car Wash Association
10810 Paramount Street, Suite 202
Downey, CA 90241
4) Rosemary Fox, President
American Association of Retired Persons
Fullerton Sr. Multi Service Center
340 W. Commonwealth Avenue
Fullerton, CA 92632
5) Todd Priest, Asst. Dir. of Public Affairs
Apartment Association of Orange County
12822 Garden Grove Blvd., Suite D
Garden Grove, CA 92643
6) Mike Noonan, Vice President
Orange County Business Control
2 Park Place, Suite 100
Irvine, CA 92714
7) David Placek, Senior Project Manager
Building Industry Association
Go Post, Buckley, Schuh, Jernigan
2501 Alton Avenue
Irvine, CA 92714
8) Elden Davidson, Utilities Services Engineer
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard
Newport Beach, CA 92663
s
9) Patti Nunn, Economic Dev. Manager
Development Services
City of Santa Ana
30 Civic Center Plaza
P.O. Box 1988, M-25
Santa Ana, CA 92701
10) Tim Serlet, Director of Public Works
City of Tustin
300 Centennial Way
Tustin, CA 92680
11) Richard Edes
Industrial/Environmental Coalition of Orange County
clo Gultom-Statham Transducers, Inc.
1644 Whittier Avenue
Costa Mesa, CA 92627
12) Tim Greaves, Deputy Fire Marshall
Huntington Beach Fire Department
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
13) Mark Asturias, Economic Dev. Manager
City of Garden Grove
11222 Acacia Parkway
Garden Grove, CA 92640
14) Judy Jarvis, Director
California Trade & Commerce Agency
750 B Street, Suite 1830
San Diego, CA 92101
15) Jack Coffey
Energy Management/UtiRies Coordinator
Disneyland
P.O. Box 3232
Anaheim, CA 92803
16) Steve Brown, Plant Engineer
LNP Engineering
1831 E. Carnegie
Santa Ana, CA 92705
o
17) Sherwin D. Yoelin, Operator-Partner
Columbine Associates
1439 Bonnie Jean Road
La Habra Heights, CA 90631
18) Anal Syresh Shah, President
Excello Circuits
1924 Nancita Circle
Placentia, CA 92870
19) Kenny Hom, Environmental Engineer
Kwikset Corporation
516 E. Santa Ana Street
Anaheim, CA 92803
20) Steven Liebermann, Vice President
Anaheim Mills Corporation
5420 E. La Palma
Anaheim, CA 92807
21) Steve Woodroof, President & CEO
Ideal Uniform Rental Service
P.O. Box 2259
Garden Grove, CA 92642-2259
22) Joe Valinsky,Senior Manager
McDonnell Douglas Aerospace
5301 Boise Avenue,
Mail Station 28-1
Huntington Beach, CA 92647
23) Don Rasmussen, Environmental Specialist
Rockwell International
3370 Miraloma Avenue-D/168-AB1O
Anaheim, CA 92803
24) Greg Davis, Dir. of Quality Control
Seven-up/RC Bottling Company of Southern California
3220 E. 26th Street
Vernon, CA 90023-4298
25) Jake Grubb, Executive Director
Surfrider Foundation
P.O. Box 2704-86
Huntington Beach, CA 92647
26) Bob Sirbert, Conservation Chair
Sierra Club of Orange County
1308 E. Fairway Drive
Orange, CA 92666
27) Jaye Apperson
Balboa Angling Club
A & Bay Streets
Balboa, CA 92661
28) Paul Snow, President
Golden Rain Foundation
P.O. Box 2069
Seal Beach, CA 90740
m
1
List for Plannina Advisory Committee
September 17, 1996
1) Mary Beth Broeren
City of Huntington Beach
P.O. Box 190
Huntington Beach, CA 92648-2702
2) Alicia Iverson
1208 E. Rose Avenue
Orange, CA 92667
3) Dr. William Gayk
Califomia State University, Fullerton
P.O. Box 34080
Fullerton, CA 92634-9480
4) Jack Roggenbuck
Orange Coast District
Department of Parks and Recreation
3030 Avenida de Presidents
San Clemente, CA 92672
5) Donald Schulz
Surfrider Foundation
2722 Mainway Drive
Los Alamitos, CA 90720
6) John Kennedy
Orange County Water District
P.O. Box 8300
Fountain Valley, CA 92728
7) Richard A. Martin
U.S. Department of Interior
Bureau of Reclamation
Southern California Area Office
27710 Jefferson Avenue, #201
Temecula, CA 92590-2628
8) Kamran Dadbeh
City of Cypress
5275 Orange Avenue
Cypress, CA 90630
9) Roger Summers
Chairman
Santa Ana Heights Redev. Project Advisory Committee
20292 Birch Street
Newport Beach, CA 92660
10) Gary Gray
2524 Harbor Boulevard
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
11) Charles Kim
12641 Industry Street
Garden Grove, CA 92641
12) Alexis Strauss
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
75 Hawthorne Street
San Francisco, CA 94105-3901
13) John Hingtgen
do Mary Rossi
2660 Elden, Suite 103
Costa Mesa, CA 92627
14) Steven Wong
do Larry Honeyborne
Orange County Environmental Health
2009 E. Edinger
Santa Ana, CA 92705
15) Edward Gala
20612 Kelvin Lane
Huntington Beach, CA 92646
16) 'Mark Asturias, Economic Dev. Manager
City of Garden Grove
11222 Acacia Parkway
Garden Grove, CA 92642
17) Mark Adelson
CRWQCB
3737 Main Street
Suite 500 Box 1
Riverside, CA92501-3339
t
18) R.J. Schwichtenberg
Newport Bay Watershed Greens
4141 Fireside Circle
Irvine, CA 92714
19) Satoru Tamaribuchi
The Irvine Company
550 Newport Center Drive
Newport Beach, CA 92660
20) 'Greg Davis, Dir. of Quality Control
Seven-up/RC Bottling Company of Southern California
3220 E. 26th Street
Vernon, CA 90023-4298
Also serving on Rate Advisory Committee
Investigation and Repair of CSDOC's I20-inch Outfall
Alternatives - Capacities and Costs
Estimated
Construction Additional Flow cost per
cost 01 capacity(2) mgd ")
Alternative ($ millions) (mgd) ($ million)
Average
High Tide Tide
1. Automatic and gate 9 5 17 1.80
2. Add pans
al. Extend diffuser by extending the 80-inch diffuser 19 4 17 4.75
secuon
a.2 Extend 72-inch diffuser 11 3 15 3.65
b. Add ports pnternal) 1.5 7 1 B 0.21
c. Add ports (eldemap 15 7 18 2.14
3. Flow relief upstream of diffuser
a. 48-inch WIWI gate 9 20 30 0.45
b. 60-inch oullef gate 9 25 35 0.36
a 72-inch oullel gate 9.5 30 38 0.32
Z7 Parallel 1204nch barrel
a-1 5,OW feel of pipe (near shore) 42 25 35 1.68
a.2 5.000 feet of pipe (deep water) 30 25 35 1,20
b.1 10,000 feet of pipe (near shore) 75 77 96 0.97
b.2 10,000 feet of pipe (deep water) 63 77 9s 0.82
W 15,000 feet of pipe (near shwa) 95 132 153 0.72
a2 15,000 feel of pipe (deep water) 1 83 132 153 1 0.63
Investigation and Repair of CSDOC's I20-inch Outfall
Alternatives - Capacities and Costs (cont.)
5. Discharge of secondary treated effluent to the exist
78-inch outlall
al With disinfection -gravity flow 4 to 10 sotMO) 90 ONO 0.07 to 0.17
a2 With dlsinfection - pumped 181024 170M 170 01 0.11 to 0.14
b.1 Without disinfection - gravity flow 3 6o 90 0r 0.05
b.2 Without dislnfectlan - pumped 16 170 a 170 r9r 0.09
6. Dlspharge of secondary treated effluent to the extended
7&inch outlall 19.D00 ft extenslonl
a.1 With disinteotion - gravity flow 441050 45�01 75 RM 0.96 to 1.11
a.2 Winh disinfection -pumped 58 to 64 1700 1170 M ON to 0.38
b.1 Without disinfection - gravity flow 43 450 75 0> 0.96
b.2 Without disinfection - pumped 56 1700 170 0> 0.33
7. Discharge of advanced primary and secondary treated
effluent to the existing 78-inch oulfell
a. Wish ftrtfatAOn 18 to 24 250M(4) 260 AN 0.07 to 0.10
b. Without disinfection 16 250r,�t4j 260 014 006
8. Discharge of advanDDd primary and secondary treated
effluent to ihs extended 784nch oudsll (DWO ft
exxension)
a. With ffismfection 58 to 64 215 M4
220 0'wi 02710 0.30
b. Without disinfection 56 215M41 220 at<i 0.26
9. Discharge of disinfected secondary heated effluent to
the Santa Ana River 410 10 80 80 0.05 to 0.13
Strategic Plate
Workshop No. 3
to
September 21, 1996
'k tat have we reviewed fit
V rkshops 1 attd 2?
Reviewed the proposed
Strategic Plan
Reviewed pending renewal of
ocean discharge permit
Reviewed preliminary
demographics information
/TYkiat have we reviewed itt
rkshops 1 and 2?
Discussed need for water
reclamation
Discussed critical success
factors for Strategic Plan
gas I
I nvestigallon,cleaning and repair of our primary
and emergency ocean ouHalIs
Increase capacity of existing ocean disposal system
to avoid building a new ocean outfell
Peak wet weather flow reduction
Financial study to determine options for:
Collecling connection fees and user charges
Long-term capital financing
P as I
Treatment, Reuse and Disposal
Determine secondary treatment
requirement
Review both existing and future
water reclamation
Review biosolids disposal options
P0II
Public Participation, California Environmental
Quality Act(CEQA)
Review she mauves
Solicit input from special interest groups,cities,
regulators and the public
to determine the best plan
Plan subject to CEQA requirements
prior to approval
ch ule
9% 1997
rvrr mi Yw en PoA$EI ort eu rm mn un mr rvx w �m
mwyay.Ckan aM P pen O[aan Outla4
Mnrepemenld Peet nm:f
Rnnnwl Molpcb
PHq$E II
�IPHq$Enlll is
wwm v,nroaelnn.cenq
sm s>-yen ve
n 11 gPhn
Le""I
".� Phase /
Project I
it
Investigation and Repair of Ocean Oulfall
Pr ject Goals
Increase capacity of existing ocean
outfall/disposal facilities
Investigate condition of oulfall
facilities and recommend repair
and strengthening projects
Oat
is the Outfall System?
Outfall pumping facilities
Operating 120-inch, 5-mile pipeline
Standby 78-inch, 1-mile pipeline
k
Emergency discharge to Santa
Ana River
Pr Yea Status
Taken core samples of 1970
120-inch outfall and 1952,
78-inch outfall
Issued proposal for diving services
to measure sediment in outfall,
install testing equipment,and close
78-inch end gate
Capacity analysis completed
Aizaluatiou of ocean
- Charge alternatives
1)Open end gate on 120-inch outfall
2)Extend 120-inch outfall diffuser
3)Add flow relief structure to 120-
inch outfall
luatioa of ocean
harge alternatives
4)Add parallel 120-inch barrel
5)Discharge secondary effluent to
78-inch outfall
6)Discharge secondary effluent to
extended 78-inch outfall
�c��luatio/t of ocean
ccltargealtertatives
7)Discharge primary and secondary
effluent to 78-inch outfall
8)Discharge primary and secondary
to extended 78-inch ouffall
9)Discharge secondary effluent to
Santa Ana River
<�)eraative 1 - open end gate
P �o
Y
n'fii��nT�eJ 1i1i77 - r n'/7fii7/Jn'
Oi CiJ9ofpiiii - rj n'd ii ii i/J
7TT�fi%/f/ii/;FfX;? ij n`R lf7ii/l
fF
17rr�rrr; y:,rrr-,�/ /i�pris�r� r
�usrt/({ 6ar/surss. g egjuffl, ,
1liijiii0 Oi ii/Siil�
lajlrrglivr q/rrtaIM ,r
artr�rru�j�
�Gw
� a
\ `
; of a
ys 9V
»:. . . .. . .
, z�
�
essineitt of condition
olves the following
future steps
Internal inspection
Outfall cleaning
Hydraulic analysis/model
General repair
�l
Phase I
Project 2
Management of Peak Hydraulic Discharge
walsRs 6ullslxe to Alloedeo
moll to Aouenboil pup saanos ayl
Moll ayl to apniiu6ew llwano
aauiuualap I is
moll jayleam lam Need
@Jpueq of papaau sluawanadwl
wals6s ayl aulwialep of ss000ad
dals-oml a buisn aje sloplsld aql
pepaau se 6luo s'apgpeJ Mau apinmd
seg!Ilpe)6upsixe to esn aLn szlwpdp
eminl ayl ui pue mou Alleolwouona
pue Rloellaj smolt head eonpay
:ol aAe s06uapeyc sPpISICI apt
i,HOzfJavpnam7a d
a3nunul 01 711103 am a l � fl
OF,
t 2 uses:
,detailed system data to analyze
specific wet weather problems in
the collection,treatment, disposal
system
r goal of die first step is to
wer these quesdous:
How much flow do we expect to see?
Where is it coming from?
How often will it occur?
What do we have to work with at present?
What do we need to accommodate the
flow in the future?
�e�(irst step uses available
�fopnation to determine system
pe formauce daring wet weather
INPUTS OUTPUTS
RBbeN
2
® $S roN
In
Seelem Opacity
.Akusi ngflow accounting, the
Dts 'cts can determine the frequency
system flow exceedences
Plant Influent
y"1'y Same Are
xx y River
•a.en ovlfall.
Storage
,/hrkw do we measure
Nq�yfiitration and inflow (III)?
1/1 is generally discussed in terms of an
"R"value
"R"is the amount of rainfall enlenng the
collection system compared to the total
volume of rainfall
"R"_ Veto.of rainlau an,arm,the.1leggn system
Volume of rainfall ever to entire collection solem
'elli, infall events cause the flows at the
frejonentplants to increase due to
•
rltrahon and inflow
Precpftalen
InlilVatgMnllOW
base Wasmxaler
�— FbW
ilkE
sups from the analysis of four
show that"R"values for the
OC system average about 0.7%
Storm Ewnt Volume
Porlod Rainfall m R
Jan 1995 WbiWnpal 0.5orlongal 0.60%
Feb INS 31bdWn,aJ 02biWnWl 0.75%
INamh INS 32billionpal 0,25billongal 079%
Jr.less 19 blllbn pal 0.1 billion gal Ogg%
studies of other collection systems,
' alues have typically ranged
ni 2%to 5%
1. Oakland fill
e
8 2 CM1erblle (2.5)
g 3. owner (Sal
j 4. GaMnsion (5.0)
5. Greenville Ise)
q 6. Walnat GM (5.0)
7. GSDOC (0.7)
fw have the Districts been able to
pre fit discharge to the Santa Aria
ver in the past?
Pump down influent trunk sewers to
provide in-pipe storage
Use interplant lines to store flows
Use standby tankage at both plants for
storage
(0y1)a5erols uoeen!e�e3 v.o!i
3
�a
IW92)P6W OSE=^o!tl xa9—
I966gPBWotZ=uold asv8 ��
Mwm5=NpeavlRYnoyay@i rye ywlE[
.lan/y nuv oluns alp of aR1my�i,p
/Ulplalod saanpa.l os/o a8alols ulal8 .
(9y1�a5ca15 uWez!ienb3 mo!j
15960PSw o>z^mo!i
uwx9•Ni�ea�lieµmyw!�i pre yni.e[ �O
p[w tNt�Naema nepm Pma2:
/lnfjno 1/Jlll_ n
'fallaRlalua alp,fo asnfo Foua if
ayJ soonpa.l 08ufol.s'lualsF'.s-ul Rnlp
/awl n¢aebe�!i�ro
� Po
P6w70"
moo
19661)P6w 0.Z=molf BseO—'
saauapaa
mot/]al/Nam lam fo F'auanba at '
sasoaaaap 67/audna puflno Rursuaaj7
flo can the Districts do in the
W1re to handle peak flows?
Reduce flow
red„ce baee now
redu inlillealipMnllow
Provide He.equalizalbn
in colleeion system
in plants
Increase discharge capacity
ma'mize use of 1W Miss
gae21e)a'ourall w1hicnar level treatment
discheye to Santa Ma River wAigher level
treatment
Pr 'ug U all together
Project 2 will incorporate the findings
of Project t to develop the overall
peak flow management program.
Adil;lue of involving
N�Aeholders
Considers many points of view
Improves"buy-in"
Provides a"fresh look"
Develops best solutions
w are we involving the
4st eliolders is the
evelopment of this program?
Formation of advisory committees
Consultation with regulators
Involvement of public and Board of
Directors
ate Advisory Coounittee is
i osed of the Major User Categories
Industrial I Commercial
Residential
to Planning Advisory Committee
Rs mposed of a cross-section
Interests
PAC
�eWappui
�o lawlp�ayua'anlen ou saq
pa
ic amen iewapam eiue
�p aryen pmip awog
ssw
m s4;lsip Buinalyae U, ®'
ualwapisum ryap�wi uy
doissiw
m s�aulsld 6Lineiyae
col uo9eiapisum�okw y
.ro)JDf'Ti�B
aowas algeilaJ sapinad
sluewannbei
Rau96e pool pue trio saaan
- yuawuonnuo
pue ypeaq oilgnd sloalad
sluawailnbaa NopInbei sloe"
alglsea7 Rlleotugoa 1
sajdlmyd gD,49>
glnb3
6)grgelomisuoo/awil
RIIIIgeladO
6V1lge!led
agueldeoae ollgnd
ubgoaloid elgawgwlAU3
owmdaooe kolaln6eH
uolloajoid ylleaq allgnd
Isop
/4loedeooA.\
DUa)UJ uoyvD1Oi1�;;�
T advisory committees
,kev9op recommendations for
sions by the Board of
Directors
Board of Direotors
—Recmnmed.v.,
PAC Mc
8'qtricts commitment to
nge County's environment
Water reclamation
Water conservation
Source control and pollution
prevention
Air quality
Biosolids reuse
Joint Boards of Directors
WorkehQp No. 3 Questionnaire
Our Quarterly Board Strategic Planning Workshops are intended to provide tlte.information you
require to make policy decisions,to obtain your input during the planning process'and to inform
and update you on staffs progress. To help us better meet these goals,we'd like your feedback
on this third Strategic Planning Workshop. Your comments will assist us in planning future
events.
September Workshop
Following a brief overview of the projects comprising Phase I of the Strategic Plan, staff member
Dave Ludwin gave a presentation on the progress and preliminary findings of Project 1,the
Investigation and Repair of the Ocean Outfall. Dave Ludwin reviewed the alternatives being
considered for increasing capacity of the outfall system. The second half of the workshop
focused on Project 2, Management of Peak Hydraulic Discharge and the relationship between
Projects 1 and 2. Lary Roesner of the consulting firm of Camp,Dresser&McKee Inc.
presented the results of the first step of the process in determining the improvements needed to
handle peak wet weather flow. Staff member Blake Anderson discussed the relationships
between Projects 1 and 2, and presented the process for selecting the most appropriate overall
flow management plan.
1. Did you find this workshop valuable? Yes_ No
Why?
2. Please rate the following:
Dave Ludwin Excellent_ Good_ Fair_ Poor
"Project 1,Investigation and
Repair of Ocean Outfall"
Lary Roesner Excellent_ Good_ Far_ Poor
"Project 2,Management of
Peak Hydraulic Discharge"
Blake Anderson Excellent_ Good_ Fair_ Poor
"Relationship Between Projects
1 and 2 and Decision-Making
Process"
3. How could we have improved this workshop?
Overall Program Evaluation
1. Are the workshops meeting your information needs? Yes_ No
Why?
2. Is Saturday morning still the best time for you to attend a Board Workshop?
Yes_ No
Alternative days/times
3. Our next Workshop will he in January. Do you have a suggestion for theme? content?
presenter(s)?
4. Do you have any additional comments for improving Board Strategic Planning
Workshops?
Thank you for taking the time to complete this questionnaire. Please fax this form to Michelle
Tuchman,Director of Communications, by Tuesday, October 1, 1996. The fax number is 962-
0356.
MEETING DATE: TIME: FOAM DISTRICTS: /..lr S. L. Z A/ l3&4
DISTRICT I JOINT BOARDS
IMORNOI ........... MC OUMM ........ _ IKERRYI ... ...... .. .. BOWMAN . ....... . _
IHMRYRSCHAFERI ..... FERRYMAN ........ (FORSYTHE) ... ... .... BROWN ...........
ICOONRI ........... MURRIY .......... ISCOTR ........ . .... WLLINS .......... .AC —
IPOTTSI ............ SALTAREW ........ (MBAY) ...... ....... COX . ............ —
ISTEDIM) ........... STANTON ......... ICOX1 ............... DEMY ........... �L/ —
(SEW ............... DENES ............JIG
DISTRICT MUER) ............. DETTLOW ......... JG
(DOWNM........... ECKENRODE ........ IPARKFRI ............ DUNIAP .......... . —
(OULLW60N1 ......... WELCH ........... . . — IDOWNEY)............ EENROOE ....... . —
(SCOTI ............ COLUNS .......... . — CX IPERRYRSCHAMRI ...... WARYMAN ........ . I —
ISELLI . . ............ DSNES ............ IANDERSONI .......... ROM ........... J� —
IPARKERI ........... DUNLAP........... (MARSHAW .......... GRIFFIN ........... JL —
IANDMIION) ......... ROM ............ M'ELCH1 ............. GULUMSON ........ .
IMORFNOI ........... MCOUIGAN ........ IWARDI ............. HAMMOND ........ . .
ICOONTZI ........... MURPMY .......... — — IBAUERI ............. LEWIS ........... 6/
IBANKHEADI ......... NORBY............ IMINERI ............. UMN .............al-AICETI............ BINGES ........... (MOUND) ............ MC OUIOAN........ —
ISTEINERI ........... STANTON ......... (COONUI ............ MURK ..........
IDALY) ... .......... 2EMEL ............ (MNKHEAD) .......... HORSY I.......... y
IEVANS) ............. RICE .............
DISTRICT3 (FOTMI ............. MLTAREW........
IOOZSONI ........... MPE'N ........... IDOTSON) ............ SAMM ........... .f —
RLATI............ SINGER ..........r RIAKEII............. SINGER ...........
KE
(KERRY) BOWMAN.......... — — VIEWERS. .. WANTON ......... _
IFORSYMEI ......... SHOWN ...........
IBTANTONI ........... BIEINFA .......... _
ISCDTR ............ COLLINB .......... — IMILLEAI ............. SWAN ............ AG
(PARKER ........... DUNLAP........... _ — — M'AHLBTR0NH ........ WLVIA .... .......
IANDERSONI ......... ROM ............ . . . (OULLOISON) .......... WELCH ...........
IMARSHAW ......... GRIFIN ........... _ — — IDALYI ...... ........ ZEMEL .. ......... _ — —
IMUM ............ LEIPZIG ........... —
INNER) ............ LOIN ............. . .
IMORENOI........... MCOUIGAN ........ MIFF OTHERS
IBANKHEADI ......... NORBY............ ANDERBON . L/ WOODRUM
IEVANB) ............ RICE ............. SAW, ..... — ANDRUS ....
(6TEINERI ........... STANTON ......... . . HOme ... — DEMIR ..... �
NAMLSTROMI ....... SYLVIA ........... . — JONK ..... _ KNOW .....
(DALY) ............. ZEMEL ............ . . — KYLE ..... .e LEE........
UNDER .... _ LWDSTROM..
DISTRICTS LUDWIN ... NINON......
IMX) .............. DMAY............ MCDNYRE.. :9 MAW......
ISTANTONI .......... COXSTENO
...... .......
OOTEN .... _ STONE .....
(DEMYI ............ COX ........... PEIERMAN ........
STR® ........
DISTRICT 8 TULHMAN.. ........ _
IPERRYISMAWRI ..... FERRYMAN......... WMEATLEY ........
(COX) .............. DEMY............ WILSON .. .......... �
ISTANTONI . ......... SIEINEII........... •••••....• ..........—
DISTRICT7 """"' """"
NAM) ............ MMMOND.........
IROTTSI ............ SALTAREW ........ . .
(LOX) .............. DEMY............
(WRRYRSCHAFMJ ..... FERRYMAN.........
IMORENO)........... MCGUTAAN ........ . . .
ICOONRI ........... AIURPHY ........., . .
ISTANTONI .......... STEWER...........
DISTRICT II
IMUER) ............ LEIPZIG ...........
IBAUER ............ DETTLOW ......... _ — —
ISTEWEIRI ........... STANTON ......... — —
DISTRICT IS
IWELMI ............ GULUXSON ........ _
(DALYI ............. ZEWL ............ _
MARKER) ........... DUNIAP...........
ICOONMD ........... MWIMY .......... _ _ _
[STANTON$ .........• Wilmil...........
DISTRICT 13
(POTTSI ............ SALTANW ........
ICOONT21 ........... MUMMY ..........
— —WARD) ............ HAMMOND......... —
ISTANTON) .......... STEINYI...........
IMILLERI ............ SWAN ............ . . . JSWMOD.BS%DIRECTOR\DL=,
09116196
ui tl l
tq
� c
IV112 �
5
i
�l ��
u
1 -
COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14
OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
MINUTES
STRATEGIC PLANNING WORKSHOP
SEPTEMBER 21 , 1996
R III CiS OF p9g9
z �
u a
• E
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018
ROLL CALL
A Strategic Planning Workshop of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,2, 3,5,6,7,11,
13,and 14 of Orange County, California,was held on September 21, 1996,at 9:00 a.m.,in the Districts'Administrative
Offices. Follow/ng the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present
for Districts Nos. 1,2,3,6,7, 11 and 14 as follows:
ACTIVE ALTERNATE
DIRECTORS DIRECTORS
DISTRICT NO.1: x Pat McGuigan,Chair _ Ted R. Moreno
x James M.Ferryman,Chair pro ten _ Arthur Perry
x Mark A. Murphy _ Joanne Coon
. Thomas R. Satarelli Jim Pole
a Roger Stanton Wlliam G.Steiner
DISTRICT NO.2: _x Norman Z.Eckenrode,Chair Carol Downey
g Daniel T.Welch,Chair pro tam John M.Gullixson
_ • John Collins George Scott
• Barry Denes Bob Bell
-x-- Burnie Dunlap Glenn Parker
x James H.Flom Steve Anderson
_II_ Pat McGuigan _ Ted R.Moreno
• Mark A Murphy Joanne Coon
• Chris Norhy Don Bankhead
--x— Sheldon Singer George L Zlaket
• Roger Stanton William G.Steiner
g Bob Zemel Tom Day
DISTRICT NO.3: x Sal A Sapien,Chair Harry M.Dotson
_X__ Sheldon Singer,Chair pro tam George L Zlaket
* Water Bowman Gail Kerry
_* George Brown Madyn Bruce Hearings
* John Collins George Scott
* Burnie Dunlap Glenn Parker
* James H.Flom Steve Anderson
* Don R.Griffin Patsy Marshall
-L_ Victor Leipzig Ralph Bauer
Wally Linn Eva G.Miner
x Pat McGuigan Ted R.Moreno
x Chris Norby Don Bankhead
x Margie L Rice _ James V.Evans
a Roger Stanton _ Wiliam G.Steiner
a Charles Sylvia _ Robert Wahlstrom
a Bob Zemel _ Tom Day
DISTRICT NO.5: X Jan Debay,Chair _ John C.Cox,Jr.
a William G.Steiner,Chair pro tam _ Roger Stanton
a John C.Cox,Jr. _ Jan Debay
DISTRICT NO.S: x James M.Ferryman,Chair _ Arthur Perry
_II_ Jan Debay,Chair pro lam _ John C.Cox,Jr.
a William G.Steiner _ Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO.T: a Barry Hammond,Chair Mike Ward
x Thomas R.SalmmIll,Chair pro tam Jim Potts
x Jan Debay _ John C.Cox,Jr.
x James M.Ferrymen _ Arthur Perry
x Pat McGuigan Ted R.Moreno
_IL_ Mark A. Murphy Joanne Coontz
g William G.Steiner Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO.11: x Victor Leipzig,Chair Ralph Bauer
x Shiley Dettloff,Chair pro tam Ralph Bauer
a Roger Stanton William G.Steiner
DISTRICT NO.13: a John M.GulluBon,Chair game)T.Welch
g Bob Zemel,Chair pro tam Tom Day
Bumie Dunlap Glenn Parker
* Mark A.Murphy Joanne Coontz
g William G.Steiner Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO.14: x Thomas R.Satarelli,Chair Jim Potts
Mark A Murphy,Chair pro tam Joanne Coontz
• Barry Hammond Mike Ward
_• William G.Steiner Roger Stanton
Peer A.Swan Darryl Miller
-2-
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Minutes
09/21/96
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Don McIntyre, General Manager, Blake P. Anderson,
Assistant General Manager - Operations, Judith A.
Wilson, Assistant General Manager - Administration,
Penny Kyle, Board Secretary, David Ludwin, Gary Streed,
Michelle Tuchman, Nancy Wheatley
Strategic Planning Workshoo
Joint Chair Collins and General Manager Don McIntyre welcomed all who attended the
third quarterly Strategic Planning Workshop and gave a brief summary of what would
be covered in the presentation.
Dave Ludwin, Director of Engineering, discussed the Preliminary Results of the Ocean
Outfall Investigation; Larry Roesner, Camp Dresser and McKee spoke on the proposed
alternatives for Managing Peak Flows and Blake Anderson, Assistant General
Manager, Operations, discussed the relationship between Projects 1 and 2, and the
Decision-Making Process.
Adiournment
The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 12:00 noon.
Secretary of thYBoar# of Directors
of County Sanitation Districts
J:\WPD=BSWIN%M2196.
- 3 -