The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1996-06-26 ' COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY: CALIFORNIA June 19, 1996 NOTICE OF MEETING JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS p141962- 411 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 mP Bw8 z OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA I-ddhtain Vallef,C 9272"127 . adcVasa. WEDNESDAY, JUNE 26, 1996 - 7:30 P.M. 10 Ellis Avenue r°untain 92708-77o a DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Member The Regular Meeting of the Joint Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Agencies Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, will be held at the above location, time and date. CRi¢s d ar Brea a Pa Buena Park Cypress fountain Valley fallertan Bo rd Se etary Huntington Beach lI Irene La Habra to Palma Lae Alamitos Newpart Beath Tentative) Scheduled U coming Meetings Dranga Y P Pnta Ana e .1 An Seal Beech Stanton STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday,June 26, 1996,at 5:30 p.m. Park Villa Perk rorba Linda FINANCE,ADMINISTRATME AND - Wednesday,July 10, 1996,at 5:30 p.m. count, of orange HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE Sanitary Districts PLANNING,DESIGN AND - Thursday,July 11, 1996,at 5:30 p.m. costa Meen CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE Garden Grove Midway City water Districre OPERATIONS,MAINTENANCE AND - Thursday,July 11, 1996, at 7:30 p.m. Irene Pancb TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE A Pabad Wastewater and Environmental Management Agency CommittedW Protecting the Envm¢n.nent Since 1954 a - mm JOINT BOARD MEETING DATES Month Joint Board Meeting July Jul 24, 1996 August Aug 28, 1996 September Sep 25, 1996 October Oct 23, 1996 November Nov 20, 1996 December Dec 18, 1996 January Jan 22, 1997 February Feb 26, 1997 March Mar 26, 1997 April Apr 23, 1997 May May 28, 1997 June June 25, 1997 July July 23, 1997 CSDOC 0 P.O.Box 8127 9 Faualaln Valley,CA 92728.8127 0 p141962-2411 �.� 05�i56 10:06 �0 71—S302- Y ]ter.-25-39j6 10:57 cr41n COAS74 hJ[1 To SOM o.01 /��.arserr.re. �IItSiM�� ne,c,wrg � r+wm✓� euga asovC�� •YinrY brq CURT PRiNG1.E S►EarrEJi OF TkM ASSEaaLY )sate 24, 19% S TO: Lrgislmive Camel rt t0aR.1FF`4� ra. Fr. Speaker Cur;prink s. . Re: Amendments to AS 2 9 _ please prepare langunpe to AB 2109 .w'%h tbo fbilowiog tirteria: 1. The bW-bell be titlsd Orange catmv Specisa E6eiency"" - 2. lxiude the following findingsII ad legislative findings an decLNiOls: A. Wtretris Otarrge Cgmry'z bankruptcy has highlighbd Head to reerga;dam and mform Public service delivery ttddddlluuuuuu000000ughout Orange County;and B. WIrmuras manjb %Wine water dirtricrs w Orange was Created by the state legislature many yend refloat agri=Wural boundarietth�bave no eelev =in a modern suburban cosma c Whar is IeDO orange County Crtend fury and others have cited the coasollde=of WC811is a mates to improve dte efUcleeley Of water service delivery; and D. Whareas partn the South County ltsucs Disevsion Group hove indicated their wilUngtless to movwith consolidation yuesuatlt totheir1996ServiceDeltwy Syvem and Covrrnancr ww SrarO: 3. Add: c.^•:m 1. The following water agencies shall be combined ss follows no later than Decambcr 31, 3993: II "ll em 4••r.+••c+ i 5-J 996 11:11 06/25/96 10:06 SCUD + R W W-052 Oe3 JLH-25-1?% 10:57 FRCM C]RSTRL ran tD SCLO P.02/05 1. Sena htergmiai pTrabuaa Canyoater DistrictThe pordaD artaoriago Cmmty wamr Districtof the watarshcd 2. ]rvine Ranch WDistrict Q rti fa District an of the es tgo County Water District [of the watera6ed 3. la Too Water D' at Mottltoa Niguel at Diatriet Los Alisos Water e. Legs Beach Coty Harriet rm ater,District South Coast Wantsq Disatnt ,S9Slitm2. Orange Cdtmv water District and Couary 'is tioo Disaret Promnge County ahal I not be subject t.,JJ the provistoor:of this Bill except der may be detarmltud by the �✓ Orange County Lod Alto= Fnrmadoa Comenissi=(OCLAFtO)with respoet tD Or st County Water District err Spa 'futd in Section 3 of this Act Statitm3• No later December 3l, I M OCSAFIhall undertake cad wmplem i its proceedings to combiDn erdsthM whnlaelt t-" y�•�a maoagrtn�districts in Orange County into two who c districts,one is northern County and ace in=them i Orange County. 'She bo hstwxn the northern etttl son wlltripaak districts shall be determined on a groundwater basis,with all or a majority 4f the Ormp County water District,the wholesale rimer as of the cities oFAoalteim, F and Sena Arts,the East Orange (:ounty R'aler Disci and the notthem pofitse atthe c Ware;District of Orange County being to d m form the mrtham dutdct.as an or a majority of the Cossw h3tmioipal R'aler D'utrick liter wgoiesale portion of the Tri-Cities Mubiei;W Wrier District,and Lim southern yoRian of the M 'eipal Water District of Omm8e unty being eamb'aed to forat the southern district Sffdi=A. Subject to provisions of Section 37081 of Ihe Onvematent Code only for the agencies Zistcd it,Section ,OCLAFCO shall implement in timely rnannar and eomplaw its Proceedings no later than the specified in Section I and 'on 3 the combining of ngcncies as providad hewin. Each ag cy listed in Sections 1 and 3 shall 1 y the cost of OCLAFCO proceedings in an arnount det fined by OCLAFCO. Ir 0CLAFC0 fails to tarn lice wnsolidntiont eau= :n$eetiona 1,3, S,and 6 by December 31, 1998,the Stare Controller taint withhold I property tax revenues &= any special district named in ctiou 1,3, S.or 6,but not consolidated by December 31, 1998. tf OCLAFCO fells ec a to mple consolidation,anumeEalted in Sections I,3, 5,or 6 by December 3]. 1998, then FCO:ball reimburse all fees to Special district or city,as 25-J 61611:! JU 25-19% 10:50 FR tillSTiL WD t0 5= apfapllttatC _• In the context of this ill, Subsection(I)CB)of Govcmn zm Code Section 57081 sbsll la: defined as a petition signed '25 perccol of the regisicred voters in the total suvio ere of•her pmposcd combined rpicctal 4 structs. No agmcy subject to Ous section&ball witise public fwlds for the Duryox of itathaing sig,Durct: fa:a petition puivam to Government Code Saeticn S70g 1. The foil water agencies shall be conso4dersd with city gov ni s as specified,pursuant to thecorditiommSection 6 of this Act: 1. The Serrano Watet District shall be consolidated wi the City of Villa Park; 2. The retail portion II f the East Orange Couery Water Iotrict ahall be consolidated with The City of Craoge; 3. 11= rz:—u1 `Ch` W=a District aha.be conxo'uuolcd with floe trip. of San Clemente; :. The Capisvaao V _ water DisttiA gall be como •IaLd 1rth the Ci- of St.J•-. Capisnmo; S. The bless Comoli Willa District ahall be mnso Weed with the City of Cosm hlesm; 6. The Yorba Linda I iater District shall be eoJsolidatO with the City of Ymba.Linda; 7. The Garden Grovee 5as District shall be rottw used with the City of Garden Grove; S. The Los Alamitos Water District sbal! be eomolidete8 with the City crLos Alamitoc; v. i 9. The Midway Citie Smitatiom District shall be consolidated with the City of westtninster $eetioa 6. Upon an innative vote of the city council m1d of the goverrdrty board of the corresponding special district OC(.AFCO abtdl complete the consolidadow listed in Section S no later than December 31, 1 98. 1 If either the city co 11 or the otsrrespoadiag special dis ricts govem6lg board, or both, fail to approve their resptetiv consolidation as enmrnamted in 5 teticim 5 of this Act,then the Omnac County Scam of Sur .iso:s aha"dir=t.wc Cl ;t;ol...ial to pl::.c as tfe I s>8 primary ballot a question to tic voter, of that city of the fillowirylg toms: I NO.OM W5 t 125 Js te:w s D y R W JL) 25-19%- 10:58 FROM CD 7 i rum t'a 1. In the case of the Water IT_ti.:"In tha ' of providing sealer aervia in a mote two eff cierd maooer ahe11 the 9arano water District /})be corsolidmed with ttm City of VUla Park; or, B)be cc IkW%td with the Irvine R=b W D err..," 2- In the ease of theil pOltioII of the�er Orange Ce Water District: "In the a ta intcr t of providing .rater ice in a more met eHid tell era .shalt the re portion of tix Emt Grange County Water . .A)be morolidawd with tha City of Orange;or, B)be consalidatnd with the Irvine anch Water D =7 lro 3. to the"a"of the portim of the Tzi—CMa Waw Disoti2'9n the interdet of proviti'v Water servix in a cost dLciaot mamter,ahaU retail portion of the Tri-Cities Water District A) be eonmli with the City of Sae Cl or.or,B)be consolidated with the Santa Margarita Want Disoi t7" C In the arse of We Vafiey Water District t ihe uerest of providing water }` service in a more cost ' t mtra6i.shall the Capteoano Val Water Dian-ic:L A)be ;> coosolidat►d With the Ciq•of In"Capisiraao;or.B)be a"Alidated with M.Swu Margarita Water Dwain?- S. In the caste of the Consolidated water Dioriet the interest of providing water service m a mom cost Mannar, shall the Metro C idwed Watcr Drams A)ba Gonmlidated with the Ciry'of Moo;or.B)be c�soli with the hvine Rench Water DisnictY 6. 1n the ease of the rba Linda Water MsniM `In Ibc interest of prWid'ntg water service in a more mu effic' tt wmer,shall the Yorba Linda W tat District be mnsolidamd with the City of Yortta Linda. ' 7. In the ease of the rden Grow Satdtatioe District the Imes[ojf��??vlditty, sanitation service Li a more xa=m . shall t)k Garden Grove Saejf(Gon�Uistrict be Consolidated with the City of wden Grover S. Fn the rase of the L Alamitos Water Disaiu: Se.-.ice in a mote cosy effici memser'shall the Los Alamltat p,�etcr District be coasolida:.d with the Ciry of Los Alamitos " V Ilk S. In the case of theleffim way Cities Sanitatin o Dimict: " n the iutsmst o viding sanitation service is a more cic inatmez, shall rhoblidu�yCities Se 'cure+ be ttrnsolidated with the City os nutter?' Section7. Thefolloinformation shall be inclutSed on Use ballot corresponding to the Ballot qucsliwss listed in Sccuec 6 of this Ace. a. The existing sp=talidlstrim's atutttal administrative ex es,as a percentage of the disma's anntml budget; 2; 06,25/96 10:06 SOOD + F u �.052 D06 31.0:-2'11996 10:59 FF71 ICOASTi MD TO SC= C.BSrgs b. The amotnd of mdaev, if any,dun the existing spec I district invested in the failed'-` _. Orange County lnvestmem 1: c The total tuntal ropenmuoo and beadts of the existing special district's chmted board members and admini ativc persoanaL d. The mum of y tncetiagc of the tatlatiaQ dicnict's governing board; e. Any capful ymj poodi" or pmDoxd by the special diamiet,and any defere4 maintman Wig. In the of any nlaetiem puesuam to Seeti 6 of chic Ad, OCLAFCO abail talcs appropriate aeuoc. d on the ousome of the vote, later than Decemlr 31, 1998. OCLAFCO shall bill the eo city foraoy actions following at cicotioa�, scraaa 6. $aesay9. The Co of Onsngc abou bm the appt xe co=espoadiag city for the cost of any el^tirr uumdc Seca 6 of this Act. c.. ;nm t o pay wart service provide formed ptanunt m an electSoa coder 5¢doa 6 of thus Aar shall be pmhibited fr inctewing service retsr to• sus =rs within its service axca for a pcood of five years Seetinn 1I. No watt—agency finds or otter pubic funds may be used for e^y Campaign propose Cr public taioasrpublic iafonrneiioa ptttpo related to as election under Section 6 ofthis ArZ • tion t . The goer hag board of may consolidated ial district formed pursuant to this Act shall have no more seer M eisnd board . Hoard members shm11 be dimedy elected by the voters ki the service area oar the new crosdlidated district in a marucr determined by OCLAFCO. 7 me guvering board of arty consolidated special district formed pur:,renr to this Act shall haw no appointed board mcmhm qFectign 13. The rove fting board members of any consul dated apmial district formed pursuant to ibis Act shall bee ected.at the November 1998 g ciccdon. Hoard members shall take office an January I j 1999. To-F- c.es June 26, 1996 ��/aU/9lp MEM0RANDIell-M �m TO: Joint Chair and Members of the Boards of Directors FROM: Donald F. McIntyre General Manager SUBJECT: Pringle Bill's Impact on Consolidation AS 2109 will be amended. The contemplated amendments do have implications for our Board composition. The bill provides for two of our member agencies to be consolidated with their city governments upon an affirmative vote of the city council and the governing body of the corresponding special district no later than December 31, 1998. If either the city council or the special district fail to approve this action, the Board of Supervisors must place the matter on the 1998 primary ballot for the voters of that city to decide. Implication for Current Governing Bodv • Midway City Sanitary District would be replaced by the City of Westminster. • Garden Grove Sanitary District would be replaced by the City of Garden Grove. • Costa Mesa Sanitary District is not in the Bill—as amended June 25, 1996. Total Board members would remain the same at 29. In the Event of Consolidation Under Section 4730, Costa Mesa Sanitary District (which is currently not named in the Pringle amendment)would Continue on the Board. Garden Grove Sanitary and Midway City Sanitary Districts would be replaced by their respective cities. Makeup of the Board would have one sanitary district, 22 cities and the unincorporated County. Total Board members-24. Under Section 4730.11 the Pringle Bill also provides for the consolidation of: Los Alamitos Water District with the City of Los Alamitos; Yorba Linda Water District with the City of Yorba Linda. Therefore, under Section 4730.1, the composition of a consolidated board, post-Pringle, would be: 1 Sanitary District (Costa Mesa) 1 Water District (IRWD) 1 Unincorporated County 23 cities Total Board members -26. JAW:jt CSDOC 0 P.O.Box 8127 • Fountain Valley,CA 92728.8127 0 (7ia)962-241 i JOINT CHAIR'S REPORT REGULAR BOARD MEETING OF JUNE 26, 1996 1 . I'M PLEASED TO REPORT THAT THE BARGAINING UNITS HAVE SIGNED SIDE LETTERS OF AGREEMENT ON CHANGING HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS EFFECTIVE JULY 1ST. THIS RESULTS IN A SIGNIFICANT SAVINGS TO BOTH THE DISTRICTS AND THE EMPLOYEES. 2. JUST A REMINDER THAT THE FOLLOWING MEETINGS HAVE BEEN SCHEDULED: THE FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE WILL MEET ON WEDNESDAY, JULY 10TH, AT 5:30 P.M. THE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE WILL MEET ON THURSDAY, JULY 11TH, AT 5:30 P.M.---FOLLOWED BY THE PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE AT APPROXIMATELY 7:30 P.M. THAT SAME EVENING. THE STEERING COMMITTEE WILL MEET ON WEDNESDAY, JULY 24TH AT 5:30 P.M. BEFORE THE JULY REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS. AT THIS TIME THERE IS NO EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE SCHEDULED FOR JULY. 3. 1 ALSO WANT TO LET YOU KNOW THAT THE DISTRICTS' EMPLOYEES FAMILY PICNIC IS SCHEDULED FOR AUGUST 10TH AT DOHENY STATE BEACH IN DANA POINT. THIS IS ALWAYS A FUN EVENT AND YOU ARE INVITED TO ATTEND. CONTACT MICHELLE TUCHMAN IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS OR WANT TO MAKE RESERVATIONS. 4. AS A HEADS UP, THE WORKING COMMITTEES NORMALLY DO NOT MEET IN AUGUST. HOWEVER, THE PDC COMMITTEE IS TENTATIVELY PLANNING TO MEET ON THURSDAY, AUGUST 1ST. 5. WE HAVE BEEN NOTIFIED BY THE CALIFORNIA FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION THAT FOR THE SECOND YEAR IN A ROW OUR FINANCE DEPARTMENT HAS BEEN AWARDED THE CERTIFICATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT FOR EXCELLENCE IN FINANCIAL REPORTING FOR ITS COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT. THIS IS THE HIGHEST FORM OF RECOGNITION IN GOVERNMENTAL ACCOUNTING AND FINANCING REPORT, AND ITS ATTAINMENT REPRESENTS A SIGNIFICANT ACCOMPLISHMENT FOR GARY STREED, MIKE WHITE AND THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT STAFF. CONGRATULATIONS! 6. AS YOU MAY HAVE READ IN THE NEWSPAPERS, THE PRINGLE BILL IS BEING AMENDED AND THE DISTRICTS IS EXEMPTED. TOM WOODRUFF WILL BE DISCUSSING THIS IN MORE DETAIL WHEN HE MAKES HIS REPORT. 7. ITEM 21 ON TONIGHT'S AGENDA-RECEIVING AND FILING DRAFT AD HOC COMMITTEE RE LANDFILL BILLINGS MINUTES FOR THE MEETING HELD ON JUNE 11 , 1996---WILL BE PULLED FROM THE AGENDA. MINUTES WERE NOT TAKEN AT THIS MEETING. MEETING GATE: JUNE 26, 1996 TIME: 7:30 P.M. DISTRICTS: 1. 2. 3. 5. 6. 7. 11, 13 AND 16 D19TRIU 1 JOINT BOARDS IMORENOI . ..... . . .. . MC UUIGAN . . ...... . I RRYI ........... . . BOWMAN . .. ...... — IFERRYISCHAFERI .. .. . FERRYMAN . . ...... . OIAST1,105).... . . ... GROWN . . .........(COONTZI .... .. . .. .. MURM(Y .... ...... ISCOTT) .......... .. . COLLINS ... ... .... J✓ _ (POTTS) ...... .. .. SALTARELLI ........ WEBAYI .......... .. COX .......... JG — ISTEINERI STANTON ......... JG ICOXI ....... DEBAY ✓ _... . . .. .... ...... .. ........... SIAUE............... DENES ........... IGAKE ............. DUNLAP ......... .. DISTRICT 2 DOWNN .. ... ....... DUNLAP .......... �L DULLIISCOTTI ............ MUCHCOLLIN .......... �� IOOIPERRYISCH FER) ...... ECXENRODE ....... —_ MELLI.............. GEES ........... L iANDE SON1 .... ...... FERRYMAN ........ — ISELLI .............. GENES ............ . (MARSHALL) .......... FLOM ......... IPARKER) ........... DUNENRODE ........ JL IMAMSHALU .......... UMFMW ON ........(ANDERSON) ......... ECIGFLOM ODE ........ 1G (WARD) ............. GULHAMMOND ........ (MORENO) . ......... FLORA ............ }� (BAER ............. HARIG .. ........ g _ IMOMENOI ........... MCOUIGAN ........ (BAUER) ............. LINN . ...........(COONTO ........... NUFFHV ........ IMINERI ............. LWN UDAN........ — OIANKHEI.. ......... SINGENORBY............ �L IMORENOI ............ MC GUIOAN........ JG RLAKETI............ SINGER ........... j/ ICOONRI ............ NU .. ISTEIN ........... STANTON ......... IMNHEADI .......... M ... (DALY) ............. 2EME ( SI ............. RICE ................. IPOTTSI ............. BALTAOELL ................. y/ _— ... ✓ —_ DISTRICTS MOTBONI ............ SAPIEN ... ........ IDOTSONI ........... "MEN ......... OLAKEN............. BWDER ... . .......(ZI.AIVIET)............ SINGER ........... BIEWEN............. STANTON — (FERRY) ............ BOWMAN.......... y/ STANTON)( ........... MINER ........ — IHASTINGSI.......... BROWN ........... y/ IMILLEflI ............. MAN............ ✓ — (SCOTT) ............ COLLINS .......... L IWAMLBTIIONI ........ SYLVM .........:: FAT WARMS) ........... DUNLAP........... V IGULLMONI .......... WELCH ......... iL IANDERSONI ......... ROM ............ _V DALY) .............. MIEL ........... JG — IMAR6HALU ......... GRIFFIN ........... �L — ISSUED ............ LEIRIB ......... — (MINERI ....... JZ STA .. MCG IGAN ........ rL_ F "ODW 01ANMOTHER OI .........'.. MORWORMY... ........ JL ANDERS.. . .. WOODRUFF .. SWANS) .. ......... RICE ............. �L OMV S ... ti� ANURUB .... SWANS) ............ PoOE ............. HONK . ... y/ DEAN ..... — (WAK T .MS ....... MVIA N ......... ✓ JONK .. ... L m.. ..... , DALY) lO...O ....... MISEL ........... V KYLE ..... �G LH........ DALY) ............. IIMEL ............ L UNDER .. .. JG LBIDSTROM.. LUDWIN . .. y/ wilm...... DISTRICTS MCINTYRE.. L SHAW BMW...... MOXI .............. DEBAY............ ✓ MCNELLY .. _ STONE ..... (STANTON) .......... MINER........... COMM .... J% ..........— IDEBAYI ............ COX ............. . MITERMAN JL .......... — STRIBED ... �� .......... DISTRICT• TUCHNAN.. _� .......... — (MERRY/SLIIAFpB ..... FERRYMAN......... WSON �G ........ ICOX) .............. .......... WILBOH ... _M[ .......... — (STANTON) .......... STENER........... ••••••••••.......... .......... DISTRICT T MARC) ............ HAMMOND......... A✓ Atmftlw IPOTTSI ............ SALTARW ........ �V A" (COX) ........ ...... DEBAY............ JL (MOUND) AFEM..... .. ... M CGUMAN......... ✓ (MOUND) ........... MCOUIOAN ........ 17O!/A.11t (STANTO ...... . .... MUnFHySTEW ( .......... V — DISTRIONI .... ...... STEINER........... DISTRICT 11 IAMERI . . ......... . UBFf* ........... Jl /,��'1��'-��n�� """ IMUERI ............ DETTLOFF ......... �� /Tv�- �t ISTEINERI ........... STANTON ...... DSTRICT 13 (WELCH) ....... ..... OULLIXSON ........ (DALY) .. . .. .... .. . . =EMEL ............ (%� ICOOKHB . . .. .... ... DUNLAP........... ICOONTONI .......... MEINER .. .. �I — ISTANTONI ... ....... BIEWEfl........... ��. DISTRICT 10 .......... MURMW L. ........ (COONT ✓ ZI ........... MAMMON ......... WARD) 15TLUER) . .......... STEINEO.........:: ,My�py (MILIERI ............ SWAN .......... OS/ESIBS PUBLIC SIGN-IN SHEET COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY JUNE 26, 1996 BOARD MEETING NAME ORGANIZATION/FIRM Please Print Please Print L .r LL(irJ �`� ST. OcSo 0elS1) O A z e„ S � MEETING DATE: JUNE 26, 1996 TIME: 7:30 P.M. DISTRICTS: 1. 2. 3. 5. 6 7. 11, 13 AND 14 � CkLA.ac., DISTRICT 1 rIY-_ JOINT BOARDS IMORENOI . ....... . . . MC OUIOAN ..C> �. IKERRY) .... . ...... .. BOWMAN ......... _ IKRRY/SCHAFERI ..... FERRYMAN ........URPNV IHASTNOSI........... MOWN .......... (COONTZI ........... M ........ -RD 19COTT) ............. COLLINS .. _ (POTTER ............ SALTARELU ........ . 11 (DEMV) ..... ........ COX ........... .. ISTEINERI ........... STANTON ......... (COX) .............. . DELAY ,TM2N\ FLCT/YGs.o (SELL) ............... GENES _......... M ( UER) ............. OETTLOM ......... _ DISTRICT 2 J /2ffi IPARKMI ............ DUNLAP .......... (SCOTT) .. .......... COLLINS ....... " f �_ (DOWNEY)............ ECKENRODE ...... IOULUXSONI ......... WELCH . .......... = (PERRY/SMAFEM ...... FERRYMAN ....... IBELU . . . . . ......... GENES . . .......... M (ANDERSONI ........ .. FLOM ........... _ (PARKER( . . ......... DUNLAP. . ......... f- A. 0- IMARSHALU . ......... GRIFFIN ... ........ _ (DOWNEY). . . ....... . ECKENRODE ........ IV y IWELCHI .. . ....... ... GULLNSON ........ (ANDERSON) . ........ FLOM ............ -ST .an IWARDI .. . . ......... HAMMOND ........ — (MORENO) . . . ....... . MCGUIOAN ........ IBAUERI .. . . ..... .... LEIRIG .... ....... ICOONTZI . . . ....... . MURPHY .......... L/� O IMINERI .. ........... LINN ... . . . . ...... IBANKHEADI . ...... . . NORBV........... Z IMOREN01 . ........... MC OUMAN. . ...... —_ RLAKM. ......... . . SINGER ......... TO ICOONTZI ............ MURPHY . . . ....... (SNNER) ......... STANTON ......... V 9 11 IBANKHEADI .......... NORBV ........... _ IDALYI ............. ZEMEL . . .......... y ,yy?jZ IEVANS) ............. RICE ............. _ (POTTS) ............. SALTARELU........ _ DISTRICTS (GOTSONI ............ SAREN ........... _ (DOTSONI ........... GAPER .. (ZLAKET............. SINGER ........... _ RLAKETI. I.......... SINGER .. ••••••• .IU STEINERI............. STANTON ......... (KERRY) ............ BOWMAN . ......... (STANTON) ....... . . . . STEINER .......... (HASTINGS).......... MOWN ....... �� (MILLER) .... ....... SWAN ............ ISCOTT ............ COLLINS q1j DVAHL6TROM1 ........ BYLVIA ........... _ DUNLA - (GULLIXSONI ...... WELCH (PARKER( FLOM ............ 4, ••. ........... IANDERSONI ......... FLORA ......... ... IDALYI .............. 2EMEL ... . ....... (MARSHALL) ... ...... GRIFFIN .... . . ... . . = — ISAUER) ....... .. ... LEIP2IG ...... ... OTHERS (MINER) ........ . . .. LINN q(Z STAFFIMORENOI ... .... . . .. MCOUIOAN .. ANDERSON WOODRUFF .. (BANKHEAD) . .. . . . . .. NORBY...... . . .... OR AY . .... ANMUS .... (EVANSI . ..... . . . . . . RICE .To HODOES ... DEMIR ..... I6TEINERI ...... . .. .. BTANTON .� JONK .... KNOW ..... (WAHLSTROMI ....... SYLVIA .... . . . .... �. KYLE ..... LEE ........ IDALYI ............. ZEMEL .... . . .... UNDER .... _ LINDSTROM.. LUDWIN ... NIXON...... DISTRICTS a DCP=" MCWttRE.. SHAW...... (COX) .............. DELAY............ / MCNELLV STONE ... (STANTONI .......... STNNER........... OOTEN .. .......... IDEBAYI ............ COX ............. .1A PETERMAN .......... STREED ... .......... DISTRICTS ��^'� T1dIMAN.. ........ _ ICOXI .SCRAPER .. FEMVMAN........ / WILSON Y .......... ILOX1 ... .......... . DEWY.. .......... WILSON .. . .......... ISTANTONI . ........ . STEWER........... ai2 .. .... .... � .......... DISTRICT 17, // it IWARD) . ........... HAMMOND......... 7 Iq'� IPOTTSI . ........... SALTAR .. T........ V"•' G (COX) . . . ........... DELAY ............. _ IPERRV/SCHAFEPI ..... FERRYMAN......... (MDRENG) .. . ........ MLOUIOAN (COONTZI .. . ........ MURPHY .......... •� 11U '` _ N^'�` I ♦ l I6TANTONI . . ........ BTEINER. .......... � DISTRICT II !' L IBAUERI ............ DETTLOFF ........ .(/( (STEINERI ........... STANTON ......... /j' DISTRICT 13 a[yJ( M' ELLHI ........... . OULLIX60N ....... , - "/3C) IDALYI . ........... . 2EMEL IPARKERI ........... DUNLAP........... ICOONT21 ........... MURPHY ... O ..... (STANTON) .......... STEINER........... �Q DISTRICT 14 P (POTTS) ............ SALTARELU ...... ICOONTZI .......... . MURPHY ....... �D IWARDI . ......... . . HAMMOND......... 77 2 (STANTON) .......... STEINER.... . ...... �T = JAWPOOMBS\DIRECTOMD1.102. (MILLER) ............ SWAN . . . ......... T OS/23/96 r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 , 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES JOINT BOARD MEETING JUNE 26, 1996 TRICiS OF09qL � c x z � c�a a i09g�cT,N�E ERA\P0��0 ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 ROLL CALL y A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,2, 3,5,6,7, 11, 13,and 14 of Orange County, California,was held on June 26, 1996,at 7:30 p.m.,in the Districts'Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1,2, 3,5,6,7, 11, 13,and 14 as follows: ACTIVE ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO.1: x Pat McGuigan,Chair _ Ted R.Moreno x James M.Ferrymen,Chair pro tam _ Arthur Perry x Mark Murphy _ Joanne Coantz _x Thomas R.Saltareli Jim Potts x Roger Stanton William G.Steiner DISTRICT NO.2: x John Collins,Chair George Scott x Daniel T.Welch,Chair pro tam John M.Gularson x Barry Denes Bob Bell x_ Bumie Dunlap Glenn Parker x Norman Z Eckenrode Carol Downey x James H. Flora Steve Anderson , x Pat McGuigan Ted R.Moreno x Mark A Murphy Joanne Coontz x Chris Norby Don Sankhead x Sheldon Singer George L Baker x Roger Stanton Wiliam G.Steiner x Bob Zama[ Tom Day DISTRICT NO.3: x Sal A Sepien,Chair Harry M.Dotson x Sheldon Singer, Chair pro tam George L Laket x Wafter Bowman Gail Kerry x George Brown Marlyn Bruce Hasfinga , x John Collins George Scott Y Burnie Dunlap Glenn Parker x James H.Flora Steve Anderson x Don R.Griffin Patsy Marshall x Victor Leipzig Ralph Bauer _y Way Linn Eva G. Miner x Pat McGuigan Ted R.Moreno x Chris Norby Don Bankhead _x Margie L Rice James V.Evans x Roger Stanton William G.Steiner x Charles Sylvia Robert Wahlstrom _x Bob Zemel Tom Day DISTRICT NO. 5: x Jan Debay,Chair _ John C.Co;Jr. x William G.Steiner,Chair pro tam Roger Stanton x Jahn C.CO)(,Jr. _ Jan Deasy DISTRICT NO.6: x James M.Ferryman,Chair _ Arthur Perry x Jan Debay,Chair pro tam John C.Co),Jr. x William G.Steiner _ Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO.7: a Barry Hammond,Chair Mike Ward x Thomas R.Saharell,Chair pro tam Jim Potts x Jan Debay John C.Co;Jr. x James M.Fenyman Arthur Perry _x Pat McGuigan Ted R. Moreno x Mark A Murphy Joanne Coon x Wiliam G.Steiner Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 11: x Victor Leipzig,Chair Ralph Bauer x Shirley Dettloff,Chair pro tam Ralph Bauer x Roger Stanton William G. Steiner DISTRICT NO. 13: x John M.GuIll Chair Daniel T.Welch x Bob Zemel,Chair pro tam Tom Day x Burnie Dunlap Glenn Parker x Mark A Murphy Joanne Coontz William G.Steiner Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 14: x Thomas R.Sahareul,Chair Jim Potts • Mark A Murphy,Chair pro tam Joanne Coontz • Barry Hammond Mike Ward • Wiliam G.Steiner Roger Stanton • _ Peer A Swan Darryl Miller -2- 4 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County , Minutes 6/26/96 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager, Blake P. Anderson, Assistant General Manager-Operations, Judith A. Wilson, Assistant General Manager- Administration, Penny Kyle, Board Secretary, Catherine Biele, Mike Broyles, Marc Esquer, Janet Gray, Jim Harris, Ed Hodges, Patricia Jonk, Steve Kozak, John Linder, David Ludwin, Greg Mathews, Bob Ooten, Mike Peterman, Ellen Ray, Gary Streed, Jean Tappan, Ed Torres, Michelle Tuchman, Nancy Wheatley, Mike White, Paula Zeller OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Bill Knopf, Mary Lee, John Shaw, Phil Stone ALL DISTRICTS Annual nominations for Chair of the Joint Administrative Organization The General Counsel briefly reviewed the provisions of the Districts' Rules of Procedure relating to nomination and election of the Joint Chair and Vice Joint Chair. This being the annual meeting fixed by the Boards at which nominations are to be made for the office of Chair of the Joint Administrative Organization, the Secretary then declared the nominations open. Director John Collins was then nominated as a candidate for the office of Chair of the Joint Administrative Organization. There were no further nominations. It was pointed out that nominations would remain open until the regular July Board meeting. The Secretary then reported that the election would be held at said July meeting in accordance with the Boards' Rules of Procedure for the Conduct of Business of the Districts. Nominations and election of a Vice Joint Chair will also be held at the regular July meeting. ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Joint Chair The Joint Chair advised that employee bargaining units had signed side letters of agreement concerning health care providers. The Directors were invited to attend the Employees Family Picnic scheduled for August 10 at Doheny State Beach in Dana Point. He advised that while working committees do not usually meet in August, a tentative meeting of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee had been set for Thursday, August 1. -3- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 6/26196 For the second consecutive year, the Finance Department has been awarded the Certificate for Achievement for excellence in financial reporting for the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. Finance Director Gary Streed and Accounting Manager Mike White, and the staff of the Finance Department, were congratulated on the receipt of this certificate, which is the highest form of recognition in governmental accounting and financial reporting. The Joint Chair stated that the agenda item regarding draft minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re Landfill billings was being pulled from the agenda. The following tentatively scheduled upcoming meetings were then announced as follows: Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee - Wednesday, July 10, at 5:30 p.m. Planning, Design, and Construction Committee -Thursday, July 11. at 5:30 p.m. Operations, Maintenance, and Technical Services Committee - Wednesday, July 11, at 7:00 p.m. Steering Committee - Wednesday, July 24, at 5:30 p.m. ALL DISTRICTS Report of General Manager Nancy J. Wheatley, Director of Technical Services, provided the status and timeline concerning the draft permit and decision on renewal of the 301(h) waiver for the ocean discharge permit. She stated that a new permit could be in place in November 1996. She then spoke regarding the closure of Bolsa Chica State Beach due to slightly elevated bacteria counts in the surfzone. Blake Anderson described the Guiding Principles program which had recently been presented to all employees. -4- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 6/26/96 ALL DISTRICTS Report of General Counsel The General Counsel reported on AB2109(Pringle)which had been substantially amended so that the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County are no longer included in the bill. DISTRICT 1 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 22, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 22, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 3 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 22, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 22, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 6 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 22, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -5- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 6/26/96 DISTRICT 7 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 22, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 11 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 22, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 13 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 22, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 14 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 22, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. ALL DISTRICTS Ratification of Payment of Joint and Individual District Claims Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That payment of Joint and Individual District claims set forth on exhibits "A" , "B", and "C", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. -6- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 6/26/96 ALL DISTRICTS 05/15/96 05/29/96 MISC. Joint Operating Fund - $ 873,862.52 $649,841.92 $ 108.00 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 1,129,139.06 468,108.82 45,329.20 Joint Working Capital Fund - 175,513.91 353,691.31 104,981.08 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 12,365.75 65,556.09 24,910.87 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 1,353.52 15,841,05 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 5,966.70 51,909.72 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 113,117.80 764,027.81 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 4,340.63 6,624.88 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 12,468.02 7,662.86 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 15,375.16 227,958.14 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 223,476.09 76,791.90 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 13 - 0.00 78.70 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 14 - 27.25 518.85 0.00 DISTRICTS NOS. 3 & 11 JOINT - 0.00 5,112.50 0.00 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 11,677.18 133,139.68 0.00 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 5,043.13 213.52 0.00 DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 6,886.43 810.91 0.00 $?590.613.15 $2 82LB88 66 6175 329.15 ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing staff to issue a ourchase order to South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) for payment of various fees required by SCAQMD regulations Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue a purchase order to South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) in an amount not to exceed $185,000.00 for payment of various fees required by SCAQMD regulations, payable during fiscal year 1996-97, estimated as follows: Type of Fee Amount Annual Emissions $80,000.00 Annual Operating Permits 40,000.00 CARB Emissions 15,000.00 Compliance Source Testing 20,000.00 Permit & Plan Applications 20,000.00 Miscellaneous 10,000.00 TOTAL $185.000.00 -7- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 6/26/96 ALL DISTRICTS Amending Personnel and Salary Resolution No 95-105 to Reflect Agreement with Represented Employee Units Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 96-54, Amending Personnel and Salary Resolution No. 95-105, to Reflect Agreement with Represented Employee Units to Substitute the MetraHealth Point-of-Service Plan for the Northwestern National Life Medical Coverage; Fund Dependent Medical Premiums at 80% and Employee-Only Coverage at 100%; Convert Dental Insurance from Self-Funded to Fully-Insured Through Delta Dental; and, Amend Plan Documents Accordingly Effective July 1, 1996. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing the General Manager to designate members of the Boards and/or staff to attend and participate in various training programs, meetings, hearings, conferences, facility inspections and other functions Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the General Manager, or his designee, be, and is hereby, authorized to designate members of the Boards and/or staff to attend and participate in various training programs, meetings, hearings, conferences, facility inspections and other functions which, in his opinion, will be of value to the Districts or affect the Districts' interests, including, but not limited to, those conducted by organizations providing specific training, state and federal legislative and regulatory bodies and the California Association of Sanitation Agencies, California Water Environment Association, Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies, and the Water Environment Federation; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging and incidental expenses be, and is hereby, authorized in accordance with existing Districts' policies and the approved annual budget for 1996-97. -8- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 6126/96 ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing the General Manager to approve travel of James Harris, staff engineer, to witness testing in connection with Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-36-2. in Denmark Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to approve travel of James Harris, Districts' staff engineer, to attend the witness testing of blower equipment required in connection with Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. 131-36-2, tentatively scheduled from July 29, 1996 through August 2, 1996 in Denmark (travel, lodging and incidental expenses to be paid by Margate Construction, Inc.). ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file draft minutes of the Steering Committee Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the draft minutes of the Steering Committee meeting held on May 22, 1996, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Verbal report from Chair of Steering Committee re June 26 1996 meeting Joint Chair Cox, Chair of the Steering Committee, gave a brief verbal report on the June 26, 1996 meeting. He reported that due to the lack of turnout at a recent strategic plan stakeholder's workshop, staff would be reevaluating the number of meetings to be held and possibly include focus groups. -9- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 6126/96 ALL DISTRICTS Verbal report from Chair of Operations. Maintenance. and Technical Services Committee re June 5. 1996 meeting Director Pat McGuigan, Chair of the Operations, Maintenance, and Technical Services Committee, gave a brief verbal report on the items being recommended for approval. ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file draft minutes of the Operations. Maintenance. and Technical Services Committee Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the draft minutes of the Operations, Maintenance, and Technical Services Committee meeting held on June 5, 1996, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS (OMTS96-013) Awarding Purchase of Natural Gas, Specification No. P-170. to PanEnergv Trading and Market Services, Inc. Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 96-55, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Purchase of Natural Gas, Specification No. P-170, to PanEnergy Trading and Market Services, Inc., for the discount price of$.0221MMBTU, for a two-year period beginning August 1, 1996, with provision for two one-year or one two-year renewal(s). Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -10- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 6126196 ALL DISTRICTS (OMTS96-012) Approvina Lease/Purchase Agreement with Scientific Utilization. Inc. to acquire Sludge Are Treatment System (Specification No. P-171) Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 96-56, approving Lease/Purchase Agreement with Scientific Utilization, Inc., to acquire Sludge Arc Treatment System (Specification No. P-171)for performance testing of sludge destruction and methane gas production, for a total amount not to exceed $360,000.00 plus sales tax, for a five-year period. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Districts' termination of the agreement at any time without penalty be, and is hereby, authorized. ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file draft minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization Study Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the draft minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization Study meetings held on May 29, 1996 and June 11, 1996, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Verbal report from Chair of Planning. Design and Construction Committee re June 6 1996 meeting Director John Collins, Chair of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee, gave a brief verbal report on the items being recommended for approval. -11- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 6126/96 ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file draft minutes of the Planning. Design and Construction Committee Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the draft minutes of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee meeting held on June 6, 1996, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS (PDC96-20) Approving plans and specifications re Job No. J-33-2 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 96-57, approving plans and specifications for Main Sewage Pump (MSP) No. 3 Drive at Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-33-2, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS (PDC96-21) Actions re Restoration of Old Laboratory for Human Resources Department, Job No. J-11-2 Aovrovinq plans and specifications re Job No. J-11-2 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 96-58, approving plans and specifications for Restoration of Old Laboratory for Human Resources, Job No. J-11-2, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids; and, FURTHER MOVED: That an amount not to exceed $55,000.00 for design, permitting, asbestos removal and termite extermination costs re said project, be, and is hereby, authorized. _12- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 6/26/96 ALL DISTRICTS Verbal report from Chair of Finance. Administration, and Human Resources Committee re June 12, 1996 meeting Director George Brown, Chair of the Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee, gave a brief verbal report on the items being recommended for approval. ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file draft minutes of the Finance. Administration. and Human Resources Committee Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the draft minutes of the Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee meeting held on June 12, 1996, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR96-29) Approving renewal of Districts' All-Risk Property Insurance Program for 1996-97 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the renewal of Districts' All-Risk Property Insurance Program for 1996-97, including earthquake, flood, personal property and business interruption coverage with: a $200 million All-Risk limit, a $30 million earthquake sub-limit, with deductibles of$25,000 for all perils except earthquake, and 5% per unit for earthquake, for a total premium not to exceed $1.4 million, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR96-35) Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of April 1996 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Treasurer's Report for the month of April 1996, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. -13- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 6126/96 ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR96-38) Authorizing staff to enter into negotiations with J.D. Edwards re acquisition of new Financial Information System (Specification No. P-172) Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to enter into negotiations with J. D. Edwards for acquisition of new Financial Information System (Specification No. P-172) in an amount not to exceed $1,525,000.00, to be brought back to the Joint Board meeting of July 24, 1996 for approval. Director Mark A. Murphy requested that his abstention be made a matter of record. ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR96-39) Approving Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Kerry Consulting Group re New Financial Information System, Phase III, Selection Process for Hardware and Software. and Phase IV. Implementation and Acceptance of the Selected Hardware and Software Solutions (Specification No. P-167) Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 96-59, approving Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Kerry Consulting Group for preparation of New Financial Information System, Phase III, Selection Process for Hardware and Software; and Phase IV, Implementation and Acceptance of the Selected Hardware and Software Solutions (Specification No. P-167), providing for financial and human resources process and procedure re-engineering oversight not originally included in scope of work, for an amount not to exceed $23,567.00, increasing the total authorized compensation from an amount not to exceed $58,263.00 to an amount not to exceed $81,830.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. Director Mark A. Murphy requested that his abstention be made a matter of record. -14- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 6/26/96 ALL DISTRICTS Approving 1996-97 Joint Works Budgets Funds Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the proposed Joint Works Budgets Funds of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13, and 14 for the 1996-97 Fiscal Year, be, and are hereby, approved and adopted as follows: Fund Total Amount Joint Works Operating/Working Capital $ 48,700,000 Workers' Compensation Self-Insurance 275.000 Public Liability Self-Insurance 385,000 Joint Works Capital Outlay Revolving 44,895,000 DISTRICT 1 Approving 1996-97 fiscal year budget Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the District's 1996-97 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed, and approved in the following amounts: Operating Fund $13,226.000 Capital Facilities Fund 10,419.000 Construction Fund - 1990-92 9,712,000 TOTAL �33.357.000 DISTRICT 2 Approving 1996-97 fiscal year budget Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the District's 1996-97 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed, and approved in the following amount: Operating Fund $61,124,000 Capital Facilities Fund 61,555,500 Construction Fund - 1990-92 29,680,000 TOTAL 1152.359.500 -15- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 6/26/96 DISTRICT 3 Approving the 1996-97 fiscal year budget Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the District's 1996-97 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed, and approved in the following amounts: Operating Fund $83,435,000 Capital Facilities Fund 51,724,000 Construction Fund - 1990-92 29,295,000 TOTAL 1 4 454 0» DISTRICT 5 Approving 1996-97 fiscal year budget Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the District's 1996-97 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed, and approved in the following amounts: Operating Fund $16,615,000 Capital Facilities Fund 12,888,000 Construction Fund - 1990-92 6,088,000 TOTALS 5�000 DISTRICT 6 Approving 1996-97 fiscal year budget Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the District's 1996-97 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed, and approved in the following amounts: Operating Fund $14,526,000 Capital Facilities Fund 9,753,000 Construction Fund - 1990-92 3,384,000 TOTAL $27.663.000 -16- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 6/26/96 DISTRICT 7 Approvino 1996-97 fiscal Year budget Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the District's 1996-97 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered fled, and approved in the following amounts: Operating Fund $20,675,000 Capital Facilities Fund 15,979,000 Construction Fund - 199D-92 7,821,000 TOTAL $44,475 000 DISTRICT 11 Approving 1996-97 fiscal year budget Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the District's 1996-97 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed, and approved in the following amounts: Operating Fund $13,392,000 Capital Facilities Fund 13,479,000 Construction Fund - 1990-92 5,433,000 Bond & Interest Fund - 1958 33 000 TOTAL $32.337.000 DISTRICT 13 Approving 1996-97 fiscal year budget Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the District's 1996-97 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed, and approved in the following amounts: Operating Fund $2,294,000 Capital Facilities Fund 8,856,000 Construction Fund - 1990-92 35 000 TOTAL $10 685 000 -17- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 6/26/96 DISTRICT 14 Approving 1996-97 fiscal year budget Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the 1996-97 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed, and approved in the following amounts: Operating Fund $4,126,000 Capital Facilities Fund 9,189,000 Construction Fund - 1990-92 166,000 TOTAL �13.481.000 ALL DISTRICTS Verbal report from Chair of Executive Committee re June 19, 1996 meeting Joint Chair Cox, Chair of the Steering Committee, gave a brief verbal report on the June 19, 1996 meeting. ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file draft minutes of the Executive Committee Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the draft minutes of the Executive Committee meetings held on May 15, 1996, and June 19, 1996, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. _18_ County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 6/26196 ALL DISTRICTS Actions re Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) application for consolidation of the nine Districts into one District Receive and file Final Consolidation Report prepared by Ford-Sauvaiot Management Group Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Final Consolidation Report dated June 17, 1996, prepared by the Ford-Sauvajot Management Group be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Authorizing staff to prepare terms and conditions, and draft LAFCO application, for consolidation pursuant to Section 4730 of the California Health and Safety Code After lengthy discussion among the Directors, a vote by district was taken whether to consolidate or not. Districts 1, 3, 5, 7, 11, and 13 approved consolidation. District 6 voted in opposition to consolidation, and District 14's voting resulted in a tie. The motion of District 2 opposing consolidation failed, whereupon the motion was restated to approve consolidation, resulting in approval of consolidation. A straw vole was then polled whether to consolidate under California Health and Safety Code Section 4730 or 4730.1. Following further discussion, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried: That staff be directed to prepare terms and conditions and a draft LAFCO application pursuant to Section 4730 of the California Health and Safety Code for the regularly scheduled Joint Boards meeting in September 1996. _1g_ County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 6/26/96 DISTRICTS 1. 2. 3, 5. 6. 7 & 11 Establishing the annual Gann Appropriations Limit for fiscal year 1996-97 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the following resolutions selecting the annual change in California per capita personal income as the cost-of-living adjustment factor, and establishing the annual Gann Appropriations Limit for fiscal year 1996-97 for each District in accordance with the provisions of Division 9 of Title 1 of the California Government Code, be, and are hereby, adopted by the respective Boards of Directors: DISTRICT RESOLUTION NO. LIMITATION 1 96-60-1 $2,884,000 2 96-61-2 11,079,000 3 96-62-3 15,289,000 5 96-63-5 2,732,000 6 96-64-6 1,770,000 7 96-65-7 5.217,000 11 96-66-11 3,300,000 Said resolutions, by reference hereto, are hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 1 Second reading of Proposed Ordinance No. 130 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That proposed Ordinance No. 130, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Amending Section 702 of Ordinance No. 119 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations Relating to Increased Capital Facilities Connection Charges, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 130 by title only. -20- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 6/26/96 DISTRICT 1 Adopting Ordinance No. 130 Moved, seconded, and duly carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Pat McGuigan, Chair, James M. Ferryman, Mark A. Murphy, Thomas R. Saltarelli, Roger R. Stanton NOES: None ABSENT: None That Ordinance No. 130, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Amending Section 702 of Ordinance No. 119 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations Relating to Increased Capital Facilities Connection Charges, be, and is hereby, adopted. DISTRICT 2 Second reading of proposed Ordinance No. 222 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That proposed Ordinance No. 222, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, Amending Section 702 of Ordinance No. 214 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations Relating to Increased Capital Facilities Connection Charges, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 222 by title only. -21- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 6/26196 DISTRICT 2 Adopting Ordinance No. 222 Moved, seconded, and duly carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: John Collins, Chair, Barry Denes, Burnie Dunlap, Norman Z. Eckenrode, James H. Flora, Pat McGuigan, Mark A. Murphy, Chris Norby, Sheldon S. Singer, Roger R. Stanton, Daniel T. Welch, Bob Zemel NOES: None ABSENT: None That Ordinance No. 222, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, Amending Section 702 of Ordinance No. 214 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations Relating to Increased Capital Facilities Connection Charges, be, and is hereby, adopted. DISTRICT 3 Second reading of proposed Ordinance No. 325 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That proposed Ordinance No. 325 An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, Amending Section 702 of Ordinance No. 317 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations Relating to Increased Capital Facilities Connection Charges, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirely be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 325 by title only. -22- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 6/26/96 DISTRICT 3 Adopting Ordinance No. 325 Moved, seconded, and duly carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Sal A. Sapien, Chair, Walter Bowman, George Brown, John Collins, Burnie Dunlap, James H. Flora, Don R. Griffin, Victor Leipzig, Wally Linn, Pat McGuigan, Chris Norby, Margie L. Rice, Sheldon S. Singer, Roger R. Stanton, Charles E. Sylvia, Bob Zemel NOES: None ABSENT: None That Ordinance No. 325, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, Amending Section 702 of Ordinance No. 317 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations Relating to Increased Capital Facilities Connection Charges, be, and is hereby, adopted. DISTRICT 5 Second reading of proposed Ordinance No. 534 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That proposed Ordinance No. 534, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Amending Section 702 of Ordinance No. 526 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations Relating to Increased Capital Facilities Connection Charges, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 534 by title only. -23- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 6/26/96 DISTRICT 5 Adopting Ordinance No. 534 Moved, seconded, and duly carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Jan Debay, Chair, John C. Cox, Jr., William G. Steiner NOES: None ABSENT: None That Ordinance No. 534, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Amending Section 702 of Ordinance No. 526 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations Relating to Increased Capital Facilities Connection Charges, be, and is hereby, adopted. DISTRICT 6 Second reading of proposed Ordinance No. 628 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That proposed Ordinance No. 628, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Amending Section 702 of Ordinance No. 620 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations Relating to Increased Capital Facilities Connection Charges, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 628 by title only. DISTRICT 6 Adopting Ordinance No. 628 Moved, seconded, and duly carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: James M. Ferryman, Chair, Jan Debay, William G. Steiner NOES: None ABSENT: None -24- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County , Minutes 6/26/96 That Ordinance No. 628, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Amending Section 702 of Ordinance No. 620 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations Relating to Increased Capital Facilities Connection Charges, be, and is hereby, adopted. DISTRICT 7 Second reading of proposed Ordinance No. 735 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That proposed Ordinance No. 735, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, Amending Section 702 of Ordinance No. 727 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations Relating to Increased Capital Facilities Connection Charges, be read by title only. and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 735 by title only. DISTRICT 7 Adopting Ordinance No. 735 Moved, seconded, and duly carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Thomas R. Saltarelli, Chair pro tem, Jan Debay, James M. Ferryman, Pat McGuigan, Mark A. Murphy, William G. Steiner NOES: None ABSENT: Barry Hammond, Chair That Ordinance No. 735, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, Amending Section 702 of Ordinance No. 727 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations Relating to Increased Capital Facilities Connection Charges, be, and is hereby, adopted. -25- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 6/26/96 DISTRICT 11 Second reading of proposed Ordinance No. 1124 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That proposed Ordinance No. 1124, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, Amending Section 702 of Ordinance No. 1116 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations Relating to Increased Capital Facilities Connection Charges, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 1124 by title only. DISTRICT 11 Adopting Ordinance No. 1124 Moved, seconded, and duly carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Victor Leipzig, Chair, Shirley Dettloff, Roger R. Stanton NOES: None ABSENT: None That Ordinance No. 1124, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, Amending Section 702 of Ordinance No. 1116 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations Relating to Increased Capital Facilities Connection Charges, be, and is hereby, adopted. -26- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 6/26/96 DISTRICT 13 Second reading of Proposed Ordinance No. 1318 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That proposed Ordinance No. 1318, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, Amending Section 702 of Ordinance No. 1311 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations Relating to Increased Capital Facilities Connection Charges, be read by title only. and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 1318 by title only. DISTRICT 13 Adopting Ordinance No. 1318 Moved, seconded, and duly carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: John M. Gullixson, Chair, Burnie Dunlap, Mark A. Murphy, William G. Steiner, Bob Zemel NOES: None ABSENT: None That Ordinance No. 1318, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, Amending Section 702 of Ordinance No. 1311 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations Relating to Increased Capital Facilities Connection Charges, be, and is hereby, adopted. ALL DISTRICTS General Counsel's comments Prior to Closed Session General Counsel reported to the Directors the need for a closed session as authorized by Government Code Section 54956.9(a) to discuss and consider the items that are specified as Items 26(b)(1) through 26(b)(9) on the published agenda. -27- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 6/26/96 ALL DISTRICTS Convene in Closed Session pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) The Boards convened in closed session at 9:24 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a). Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Boards of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. No action was taken re Agenda Items 26(b)(1), (3), (4), (6), and (9). A report of actions taken was reported in regular session as set forth immediately below. ALL DISTRICTS Reconvene in regular session At 10:05 p.m., the Boards reconvened in regular session. ALL DISTRICTS Receive, file, and deny claim of Andv C. Patterson: Jackie J. Venezio: Lacey Miller, a minor, by and through her Guardian Ad Litem. Geornianne I. Miller: Dorothy M. R. Holm and as Executrix of the Estate of Richard L. Holm and Louis R. Sangermano (Government Code Section 54956.9fblf11) Upon return from closed session, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the claim of Andy C. Patterson, at al. dated May 17, 1996, for damages for personal injury, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed, and denied. _28_ County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 6/26/96 ALL DISTRICTS Confer with Districts' representatives concerning status of negotiations with employee group representatives on salaries, benefits, and terms of employment (Government Code Section 54957.6) Upon return from closed session, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried: That an increase in life insurance coverage for Confidential Employees from $15,000.00 to $50,000.00, be, and is hereby, approved, and, FURTHER MOVED: That the same Sick Leave Incentive Plan be utilized for Confidential Employees as provided to Professional and Supervisors, based upon the recommendation of the Districts' employee negotiating representatives, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Landfill acquisition billings re claim of Saybrook Capital and Price Waterhouse for professional services fees (Government Code Section 54956.91011) Upon return from closed session, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried: That payment of$60,000.00 to Saybrook Capital and $120,000.00 to Price Waterhouse, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICT 2 Appeal of Administrative Complaint filed against Porter Plating Inc. and Jerry Porter (Government Code Section 54956.91b1111) Upon return from closed session, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried: That a hearing date be set for August 1996 or later, and that the Board Secretary poll District 2 Directors for a mutually convenient date. _29_ County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 6/26196 DISTRICT 1 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjoumed in memory of Timothy McKinley, infant son of Dawn McKinley, Senior Human Resources Analyst. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:05 p.m. DISTRICT 2 Approving Interim Settlement Agreement with Security Capital Investment Trust Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Interim Settlement Agreement with Security Capital Investment Trust, providing for deferral of determination of total fees due, pending outcome of District's study of connection fees, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICT 2 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned in memory of Timothy McKinley, infant son of Dawn McKinley, Senior Human Resources Analyst. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:05 p.m. DISTRICT 3 Adiournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned in memory of Timothy McKinley, infant son of Dawn McKinley, Senior Human Resources Analyst. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:05 P.M. -30- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 6/26/96 DISTRICT 5 Adiournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned in memory of Timothy McKinley, infant son of Dawn McKinley, Senior Human Resources Analyst. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:05 p.m. DISTRICT6 Adiournmenl Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned in memory of Timothy McKinley, infant son of Dawn McKinley, Senior Human Resources Analyst. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:05 p.m. DISTRICT 7 Receive and file Summons and Complaint for Personal Injury. Properly Damage. and General Negligence Premises Liability, Daisy Brood vs. Calfon Construction. Inc.. et al.. Orange County Superior Court Case No 764464 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Summons and Complaint for Personal Injury, Property Damage, and General Negligence Premises Liability, Daisy Brood vs. Calfon Construction, Inc., at al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 764464, relative to personal injuries and property damage sustained in connection with the construction of Parallel and Replacement Portions of Lemon Heights Subtrunk Sewer, La Colina Drive to Newport Boulevard, Contract No. 7-22, and Manhole Access Modifications to RA-14 Sewer at Newport Boulevard and Cowan Heights Drive, Contract No. 7-24, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the District's General Counsel be, and is hereby, authorized to appear and defend the interests of the District. -31- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 6/26/96 DISTRICT 7 Adiournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned in memory of Timothy McKinley, infant son of Dawn McKinley, Senior Human Resources Analyst. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:05 p.m. DISTRICT 11 Adiournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned in memory of Timothy McKinley, infant son of Dawn McKinley, Senior Human Resources Analyst. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:05 p.m. DISTRICT 13 Adiournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned in memory of Timothy McKinley, infant son of Dawn McKinley, Senior Human Resources Analyst. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:05 p.m. -32- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 6/26/96 DISTRICT 14 Adiournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned in memory of Timothy McKinley, infant son of Dawn McKinley, Senior Human Resources Analyst. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:05 p.m. Secretary of th rd f Directors of County San a on ricts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, , 7, 1 , 13 & 14 -33- FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE O5/1M96 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/15M POSTING DATE 05015M WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 161784 A C&S $24,227.00 INSULATION REMOVAL-ENGINE EXHAUST PIPING&BOILE 151785 AMS(ACOUSTICAL MAIL SERV) $1,053.71 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 151786 ASCE CONTINUING EDUCATION $664.28 TRAINING MATERIALS 151787 AT&T-MEGACOM SERVICE $2,965.96 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 161788 A T&T-PRO WATTS $910.56 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 151759 A T&T-CELLULAR CR&R $5.04 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 151790 A T&T-CELLULAR CR&R $11.97 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 151791 A13ATIX ENVIRONMENTAL $616.50 SAFETY SUPPLIES 151792 ABRASIVE ENG.TOOLING&EQUIP. $239.19 HARDWARE 151793 AIR CLEANING SPECIALISTS INC $260.00 ELECTRIC PARTS 151794 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $36.651.01 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.O.8-9-89 151795 AIRBORNE EXPRESS $8.75 AIR FREIGHT 151796 AMERIDATA $147.154.04 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 151797 AMERICAN AIRLINES $5.871.75 TRAVEL SERVICES 151798 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION $27,610.16 SEWER REPAIRS TIT 151799 BLAKE P.ANDERSON $671.88 REIMBURSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE&MEETING EXP. X 151800 ANGEL SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS INC. $323.25 LAB SUPPLIES S 151801 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL $330.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT " 151802 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $4,994.33 NOTICES&ADS 151803 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $2.021.31 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 161804 AQUATIC BIOASSAY&CONSULT $5.905.00 LAB SERVICES D 151805 ARMOR-VAC $738.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES I 151808 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. $135.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL ~ 151807 ATKIWJONES COMPUTER SERVICE $321.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT 151808 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $3,391.84 PAYROLL SERVICES 151509 AWARDS&TROPHIES $11.59 PLAQUES 151610 BFI MEDICAL WASTE SYSTEMS $5.50 WASTE DISPOSAL 151811 BKK LANDFILL 52,654.00 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10.9.91 161812 E S BA13COCK&SONS INC $2,295.00 LAB ANALYSIS 161813 BARNEBYSUTCLIFFE CORP. $1,571.39 ELECTRIC PARTS 151814 BATTERY SPECIALTIES 5411.89 BATTERIES 151815 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $692.52 LAB SUPPLIES 151816 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $456.55 TRUCK WASH TICKETS 151817 BONA-RUES $331.11 TRUCK PARTS 151818 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $18,475.76 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-1B-2 151819 BRENNER-FIEDLER&ASSOC.,INC. $123.69 GENERATORS 151820 SNI BOOKS $321.88 BOOKS 151821 CCI TECHNOLOGIES $5,881.00 PHONE LINE INSTALLATION 151822 CEPA $882.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 151823 C.P.I. $1,269.23 LAB SUPPLIES 151824 CS COMPANY 55,753.91 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 151825 CALTROL.INC. $1,498.11 HARDWARE 151828 CALIF ASSOC.OF SAN.AGENCIES $130.00 WORK CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 161827 CAMAU CORP. $800.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 151828 CANUS CORPORATION $24,782.50 FIBER OPTIC CABLE 151829 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $31,300.34 ENGINEERING SERVICES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05114196 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05115M POSTING DATE 05115196 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 151830 CASHCO $420.84 VALVE 151831 MDTICASTLE $358.95 LAB SUPPLIES 151832 CENTURY MICRO PRODUCTS $4,799.32 COMPUTER SUPPLIES B SOFTWARE 151833 CHEMWEST INC $576.70 PUMPS 151834 CLAYTON ENVIRO CONSULT $9,236.28 INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE SERVICES 151835 COLE-PARMER INSTRUMENT CO. $240.44 LABSUPPUES 151836 COUCH B SONS $191,605.33 CONSTRUCTION 11-17-1 151837 COLOR ARTS INC $4.941.18 PRINTING SERVICES 151839 COMMUNICATIONS PERFORMANCE GROUP $17.850.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MO 10.25-95 151839 COMPUSERVE $322.64 COMPUTER SERVICES 151840 CONNELL GM PARTS I DIV. $142.31 TRUCK PARTS 151841 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $10.240.84 ELECTRIC PARTS 151842 CONSUMER PIPE $701.35 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 161843 CONTINENTAL EQUIPMENT S SUPPLY $88.76 TOOLS 151844 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS O C $17.714.34 CONSULTING SERVICES M.O.8-11-93 m 151845 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $951.29 ENGINE PARTS X 151848 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $183.12 TRUCK PARTS s 151847 COUNTY CLERK $38.00 NOTICE OF EXEMPTION FEE 151848 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $1,361.31 ELECTRIC PARTS �--� 151849 CUMMINSALLISON CORP $961.20 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS 151B50 DAILY PILOT $144.00 NOTICES BADS 151851 J.W.DANGELO CO.INC. $633.57 VALVES 1 151852 JAMES DARLINGTON $3.262.50 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES N 161853 DAVET3 BICYCLES,INC. $149.61 BIKE REPAIRS 151854 ALBERT W.DAVIES,INC. $25,177.77 CONSTRUCTION 3.36R 161855 DELL MARKETING L.P. $10.161.91 COMPUTERS 151856 DEL MAR ANALYTICAL $950.00 BIOSOLIDS ANALYSIS 151857 DEZURICKAND/ORCSCO. $16.464.44 VALVES 151858 DIAMOND LINERS INC $435.27 TRUCK BED LINER 151859 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $5.734.29 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 151880 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $940.00 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 151861 JIM DAVIDSON $403.70 CONFERENCE EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 151862 JAN DEBAY $174.00 CASA CONFERENCE REIMBURSEMENT 151863 ESP NORTH $930.51 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 151864 ELE INTL I SOILTEST PROD $371.35 TOOLS 151865 ELECTRA-BOND,INC. $5.543.74 EQUIPMENT REPAIR 151866 ELECTRO NUMERICS INC $2.593.74 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 151867 ENCHANTER,INC. $2,000.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5.24-95 151860 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $976.20 LAB SERVICES 151869 FLUID TECH.SALES $816.80 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 151870 FMC CORPORATION $52.406.83 HYDROGEN PEROXIDE MO 9-14-94 151871 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE 57,008.75 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10.9-91 151872 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $317.04 AIR FREIGHT 151873 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $685.83 FILTERS 151874 FIRSTCHOICE $778,29 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT 151575 FISCHER 9 PORTER CO. $7,030.69 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE O5/14/95 PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05115M POSTING DATE 05115M WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 151876 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $532.50 LAB SUPPLIES 151877 FLOSYSTEMS $19.154.59 PUMP PARTS 151878 FLORIDA CONVEYOR B EQUIP $1,537.89 MECHANICAL PARTS 151872 FORD SAUVAJOT MGMT GROUP $285.00 CONSOLIDATION SERVICES 151880 FORMA SCIENTIFIC.INC. $309.61 FREIGHT CHARGES 151881 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $168.37 PHOTO SUPPLIES 151082 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $449.26 PAINT SUPPLIES 151883 THE FOXBORO CO. $954.72 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 151854 FRANKLIN ELECTRONIC PUBLISHERS $244.63 PUBLICATIONS 151885 FRY'S ELECTRONICS $3,595.12 ELECTRONIC 8 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 151886 FURON DEKORON $354.68 CABLE 151887 GKK CORPORATION $10.525.11 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES J-11.2 151888 GST,INC. $688.24 OFFICE SUPPLIES 151889 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $623.48 LUMBERHARDWARE 151890 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $3.648.15 CHEMICALS m 151891 GE IND B POWER SYSTEMS $9,746.80 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES = 151892 GENERAL ELECTRIC MULTILIN $23543 RE-PROGRAM EQUIPMENT 151893 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $1,613.99 ELECTRIC PARTS Ip 151694 GENERAL PETROLEUM $10,99352 GASOLINE 151895 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1,699.27 TELEPHONE SERVICES 151898 GIERUCH-MITCHELL, INC. $20,165,15 PUMP PARTS D 151897 WIN GRAINGER,INC. $317.86 COMPRESSOR PARTS W 161898 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $169.71 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 151899 GRASSY ANDERSEN $2,437.28 ENGINE PARTS 151900 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC WHOLESALE $1.783.66 CABLE ASSEMBLY 151901 DGA CONSULTANTS $6,737.58 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6894 151902 KEVIN HADDEN $180.65 CONFERENCE EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 151903 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $1,56D.52 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 151904 HATCH 8 KIRK,INC. $24.35 TRUCK PARTS 151905 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS $2.625.00 CONTAINER RENTALS 151906 PL HAWN CO,INC. $696.97 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 151907 HERB'S BLACK FOREST BAKERY $435.10 TRAINING LUNCHEON 151908 HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT $2,083.33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN. 151909 HEWLETT PACKARD $510.74 SERVICE AGREEMENT 161910 HOME DEPOT $156.71 SMALL HARDWARE 151011 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $202.95 PAINT SUPPLIES 151912 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $10.314.99 WATER USE 151913 IPCO SAFETY $12,808.07 SAFETY SUPPLIES 151914 INDUSTRIAL FILTER MFG. $57.97 FILTER 151915 INDUSTRIAL METAL SUPPLY CO, $1.123.48 METAL 151916 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $99,75 CONNECTORS 151917 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $1,055,00 BATTERIES 151918 J2 PRINTING SERVICES $635,31 PRINTING 151919 JAMISON ENGINEERING $49.870.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 151920 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $958.39 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 151921 JAY'S CATERING $873.78 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05114MG PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05115/96 POSTING DATE 05/151% WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 151922 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO. $126.08 GAUGE 151923 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 8835.95 ELECTRIC PARTS 151924 JONES CHEMICALS,INC. 330,880.61 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE M04-26-95 161925 JORDAN CONTROLS INC $121.62 REPAIR CIRCUIT BOARD 151926 KALLEEN'S COMPUTER PRODUCTS $239.77 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 151927 KEMIRON PACIFIC,INC. $144.615.93 FERRIC CHLORIDE M09-27-95 151928 KEYE PRODUCTIVITY CENTER $159.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 151929 KING BEARING,INC. $623.39 MACHINE SUPPLIES 161930 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $690.19 TOOLS 151931 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $1,280.44 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICE 151932 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY CO. $8.523.00 SAFETY SUPPLIES 151933 LAW/CRANDAL,INC. $12.272.50 SOIL TESTING 7-13.94 151934 LEE&RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC. $54.286.83 ENGINEERING SERVICES 151935 PINKY E.LOPEZ $118.51 COMPUTER SUPPLIES REIMS. 151938 R.F.MACDONALD CO. $1.098.57 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 151937 MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY CORP. 11,046.73 MECHANICAL PARTS m 151938 MANLEYS BOILER REPAIR CO,INC $780.00 BOILER REPAIR = 151939 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $702,757.00 CONSTRUCTION PI-36-2 151940 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $34,866.00 CONSTRUCTION P242-2 151941 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $26.89 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES --4 151942 DONALD F.MCINTYRE $424.50 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT n 151943 MC JUNKIN CORP $3.854.69 PLUMBING SUPPLIES I 151944 MCWELCO RACK-N-BOX CO $1,188.21 TOOLS F 151045 MEDICAL BENEFITS $196.00 SUBSCRIPTION 151946 MES COMPANY $1.976.14 MECHANICAL PARTS 151947 MICROTEST INC 3250.78 SCANNER REAPIR 151948 MIDWAY MFG.&MACHINING $6.045.09 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 151949 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3.125.80 UNIFORM RENTALS 151960 MOBILE HOSE AND HYDRAULIC $134.86 PUMP PARTS 151951 MONITOR LABS $311.50 INSTRUMENT 151952 MOTION INDUSTRIES,INC. $39.50 PUMP PARTS 151953 NATIONAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION $186.50 SOFTWARE 151954 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $1.656.43 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 151955 RORY NELSON $161.00 CWEA CONF.EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 151956 NETWORK GENERAL CORP. $22.937.37 COMPUTER 151957 NEWARK ELECTRONICS $57.76 INSTRUMENT PARTS 151958 NICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY $11,403.87 LUBRICANTS/DIESEL FUEL 151959 OI CORPORATION $240.74 LAB SUPPLIES 151960 OMNI WESTERN INC $493.73 TOOLS 151961 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL $1.013.65 CHEMICALS 151962 ORANGE COURIER $35.10 COURIER SERVICES 151963 ORIL FIRE PROTECTION $4,383.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 151964 OXYGEN SERVICE $2,384.74 SPECIALTY GASES 151905 COUNTY OF ORANGE $60.00 ROLL CHANGE PROCESSING FEE 151966 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $9,982.42 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP 151967 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT $31,692.90 GAP WATER USE M.O.B-M3 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE O5114/96 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/15016 POSTING DATE 05115M WARRANTNO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 151968 PSSI $5.624.10 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION 151969 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $44.79 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 151970 PACIFIC PARTS $20,164,86 INSTRUMENT PARTS 151971 PACIFIC BELL $131.56 TELEPHONE SERVICES 151972 PAGENET $1,053.11 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 151973 PALMIERI,TYLER,WIENER, $11.30 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.6.12.91 161974 PEGO SYSTEMS $834.48 HOSE 151975 PERVO PAINT $684.64 PAINT 151076 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $1.313.74 REIMBURSE PETTY CASH 151977 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $130,139.13 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.329.95 151978 PLANNING SOLUTIONS $750.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 151979 POLY ENTERPRISES INC $608.79 SAFETY SUPPLIES 151980 POLYPURE,INC. $38,789.12 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3.11-92 151981 PRECISION INDUSTRIES $968.80 INSTRUMENT PARTS 151982 PRESENTATION PRODUCTS $480.23 OFFICE SUPPLIES 151983 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $96,00 ICE FOR SAMPLES m 151984 PULSAFEEDER $3.692.00 PUMP PARTS = 151985 PUMPING SOLUTIONS $1,300.50 PUMP .y 151986 QUALITY BUILDING SUPPLY $167.44 CONCRETE DYE 151987 RS MEANS CO.,INC. $1,122.67 PUBLICATION 1519B8 R M CONTROLS $129.85 INSTRUMENT PARTS 151989 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $223.95 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS n 151990 R 8 R INSTRUMENTS $93.44 ELECTRIC PARTS VT 151991 RSA SOIL PODUCTS INC $795.00 SAWDUST 151992 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $2,002.72 TRASH REMOVAL 161993 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO. $195.92 LAB SUPPLIES 151994 RED WING SHOES $113.78 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 151995 BOLT DELIVERY $54.25 FREIGHT 151996 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DIST $850.81 ELECTRIC PARTS 151997 RUSSELECTRIC $1,718.92 ELECTRIC PARTS 151998 RYAN-NERCO $580.99 METAL 151999 SAFETY WEST $591.39 INSTRUMENT PARTS 152000 SANCON ENGINEERING, INC. $5,200.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 152001 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS $981.29 ELECTRIC PARTS 152002 SCHWING AMERICA,INC. $385.15 PUMP PARTS 162003 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INrL $69.046.89 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.68.94 152004 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $2,016.00 SPECIALTY GASES 152005 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $221.38 TOOLS 152006 SHASTA ELECTRIC $46.775.00 INSTALL CONDUIT 152007 SHEPHERD MACHINERY CO. $301.13 TRUCK PARTS 152008 SHURELUCK SALES $6.328.64 TOOLSMARDWARE 152009 SIGMA CHEMICAL OO. $341.82 LAB SUPPLIES 152010 SKALAR,INC. $694.25 LAB SUPPLIES 152011 SKILL PATH SEMINARS $207.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 152012 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $205.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 152013 SMITH-EMERY CO. $431.00 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-1344 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05/14/98 PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05115198 POSTING DATE O5115198 WARRANTNO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 152014 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP. $1,237.44 TOOLS 162015 SOUTH COAST WATER $125.00 LAB SUPPLIES 152016 SO CALIF EDISON CO $67.441.96 POWER 152017 SO CALIF EDISON CO $11.365.55 POWER 152018 SO.CAL GAS.CO. $19,199.23 NATURAL GAS 152019 SO.CALIF.WATER CO. $68.31 WATER USE 152020 STAMEN L SPASSOFF P.E. $2,400.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19-2 152021 STANDARD SUPP&EQUIP CO $402.68 MECHANICAL PARTS 152022 STERLINGART $25.24 ART SUPPLIES 152023 SUMMIT STEEL $2,095.74 METAL 152024 SUNSETFORD $80.66 TRUCK PARTS 152025 SUNSET INDUSTRIAL PARTS $135.94 MECHANICAL PARTS 152026 SUPELCO.INC. $300.64 LAB SUPPLIES 152027 SUPERB ONE-HOUR PHOTO $29.54 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 152028 SUPER POWER PRODUCTS $517.20 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 152029 SYMCAS $47.50 CONSULTING SERVICES m 152030 SYSCOMINC $6,000.00 INSTALLATION&TRAINING FOR NEW DATABASE SYSTEM X 152031 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $2.680.10 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 2 162032 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $893.98 MECHANICAL PARTS bd 152033 TONYS LOCK&SAFE SERVICE $1,139.95 LOCKS&KEYS .- --1 152034 ED TORRES E214.23 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 152035 TOSHIBA INTERNATIONAL $76.31 INSTRUMENT PARTS nl 152036 TOUCHSTONE SOFTWARE CORP. $60.52 DIAGNOSTIC UPGRADE KIT 152037 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE,INC. $372.67 TRUCK PARTS 152038 TREBOR ELECTRONICS $1.108.27 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 152039 MITCH TRIVANOVICH $745.50 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 152040 TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY,INC. 57,298.84 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.0.5-11-94 182041 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $931.93 TRUCK PARTS 152042 TRUCK PARTS SUPPLY $169.81 TRUCK PARTS 152043 JG TUCKER&SON,INC. $2.715.26 INSTRUMENT PARTS 152044 TUSTIN DODGE $56.87 TRUCK PARTS 162045 UNISOURCEWOR BUTLER PAPER $50.97 OFFICE SUPPLIES 152D48 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $426.01 PARCEL SERVICES 162047 WJR SCIENTIFIC $2.848.26 LAB SUPPLIES 152048 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $4,392.99 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 152049 VERNE'S PLUMBING $110.00 PLUMBING SERVICES 152050 VERTEX TECHNOLOGIES,INC. $490.48 FIBER OPTICS 152051 WACKENHUT CORP. $3.389.69 CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS 152052 WARDIDAVIS COMMUNICATIONS $7,205.80 FIBER OPTIC TEST KIT 152053 CARL WARREN&CO. $300.00 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR 152054 WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION $34.50 PUBLICATION 152055 WATERMAN SUPPLY $767.72 CHAIN 152056 WEAVER&THOMAS 5297.47 PERMIT REFUND 152057 MRS.WILLIAM WELTER $193.13 PERMIT REFUND 152058 WESTERN METRO UNIT $1,743.31 FILTERS 152059 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $30,229.69 CAUSTIC SODA MO 8-2$-95 FUNDING 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05/14196 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05115M POSTING DATE 05/15/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 152060 WEST-LRE SUPPLY CO. $114.84 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 152061 WESCO $371.74 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 152062 NANCY WHEATLEY $611.38 MEETING EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 152063 JUDITH A WILSON 6106.87 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 152064 WIRE MARKERS,INC. $504.91 FIBER OPTIC TOOLS 152065 ROURKE,WOODRUFF&SPRADLIN $7.570,00 LEGAL SERVICES MO 7-26-95 152066 WORDPERFECT $39.00 SUBSCRIPTION TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 05/15/96 $2,590.613.15 SUMMARY AMOUNT fn #10PER FUND $1,353.52 X #20PER FUND $5,966.70 .Z-. #30PER FUND $58,576.08 py 03 CAP FAC FUND $54,541.72 --i #50PER FUND $4.340.63 06 OPER FUND $72.68 n #6 CAP FAC FUND $12,395.34 V #7 0PER FUND $14,518.55 #7 CAP FAC FUND $856.61 #11 OPER FUND $12,170.67 #11 CAP PAC FUND $211,305.42 #14 CAP FAC FUND $27.25 #5&8 OPER FUND $2.380.22 #5&6 CAP FAC FUND $9,296.96 96&7 OPER FUND $5,043.13 #7&14 0PER FUND $6.886.43 JT OPER FUND $873,862.52 CORF $1,129,139.08 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $12,365.75 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $175,513.91 $2.590.613.16 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0524/98 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0529/98 POSTING DATE 05/29/98 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 152098 ABB LOGISTICS CENTER $3,240.05 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 152097 ACS PUBLICATIONS $169.85 PUBLICATION 162098 ASL CONSULTING ENGINEERS $480.00 ATWOOD SUSTRUNK PLAN PREPARATION 152099 ATB T-MEGACOM SERVICE E703.58 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 152100 ATB T-CELLULAR CR BR $13.27 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 152101 A T 6 T-CELLULAR CR 8 R $6.77 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 152102 ABRASIVE ENG.TOOLING B EQUIP. $189.60 HARDWARE 152103 ACCOUNTANTS OVERLOAD $2,651.20 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 152104 ACTION DOOR REPAIR CORP. $324.93 DOOR REPAIRS 152105 ADMOR MEMORY $1.805.17 COMPUTER PARTS 152105 TERRYAHN $329.54 CONFERENCE EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 152107 AIR CLEANING SERVICES CO $1.465.22 FILTERS 152108 AIR PRODUCTS 6 CHEMICALS $18,326.78 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.O.8-9b9 152109 AIRBORNE EXPRESS $182.75 AIR FREIGHT 152110 AMERIDATA $8,168.61 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 152111 AMERICAN SIGMA $350.66 MISCELLANEOUS HARDWARE TTI 152112 AMOCO ENERGY TRADING $37,802.61 NATURAL GAS MO 6-28-95 X 152113 ANGELUS PACIFIC CO.,INC. $203.79 CARPOOL TAGS �_. 152114 ANIXTER-DISTRIBUTION 54.637.34 COMPUTER SUPPLIES DO 152115 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $11,633.06 NOTICES 6 ADS -1 152110 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE,INC. $628.32 TOXIC WASTE REMOVAL W 152117 AUTGDESK INC $424.71 SOFTWARE I 152110 AWARDS B TROPHIES $24.24 PLAQUES I-' 152119 BC WIRE ROPE 6 RIGGING $182.22 AUTO PARTS 162120 E S BABCOCK&SONS INC 5810.00 LAB ANALYSIS 152121 BANANA BLUEPRINT $8.201.03 PRINTING M.OA 1.07-94 152122 BARNES&NOBLE BOOKS $366.54 PUBLICATIONS 152123 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $949.90 BATTERIES 162124 BAUER COMPRESSOR $162.49 COMPRESSOR PARTS 152125 BAYSHORE PSYCHOLOGY CENTER $170.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 152126 BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS $85.52 LIB EQUIPMENT 152127 BIO,GRO DIVISION $87,221.86 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 426.95 152128 BUDGETJANITORIAL $3,330.00 JANITORIAL SERVICES MO 1.12-94 152129 THE BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFFAIRS $769.34 SUBSCRIPTION ON CD 152130 BUSH 8 ASSOCIATES,INC. $678.00 SURVEYING SERVICES MO 64494 152131 CEM CORPORATION $543.61 LAB SUPPLIES 152132 CH2M HILL $216,213.02 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-31 162133 C.L.TECHNOLOGY $720.00 GAS ANALYSIS SERVICES 152134 C.P.I. $1.050.60 LAB SUPPLIES 152135 CPU COMPUTER REPAIR $221.15 COMPUTER REPAIR 152136 CS COMPANY $5.335.69 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 152137 CWCI $21.01 PUBLICATIONS 162138 THE CALBOND JOURNAL $59.00 SUBSCRIPTION 152139 CALFON CONSTRUCTION $213,870.95 CONSTRUCTION 7-22&7-24 152140 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH INC. $74.02 LAB SUPPLIES 152141 CAMALI CORP. $2.575.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05/24/96 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05129M POSTING DATE 05/29/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 152142 CANUS CORPORATION $24,750.00 FIBER OPTIC CABLE 152143 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $94.176.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-38,J-33 152144 CASA $130.00 REGISTRATION-KEVIN MADDEN 152145 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $996.69 OFFICE FURNITURE 162146 CENTURY MICRO PRODUCTS $6,895.92 COMPUTER PARTS 152147 CERFNET $20.00 COMPUTER SERVICES 152148 CERTEX ELECTRONICS INC $969.09 COMPUTER REPAIR 152149 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $300.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 152150 COAST INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO. $43.96 MISCELLANEOUS HARDWARE 152151 COLD SAWS OF AMERICA,INC. $26.45 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 152152 COUCH 8 SONS $30,292.20 CONSTRUCTION M-044 152153 COUCH 8 SONS $59,396.00 CONSTRUCTION 11-17-1 152154 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $1.794.36 PUMP PARTS 162155 COMPUTERS AMERICA $208.72 COMPUTER SUPPUES 152155 COMPUTERS AND ACCESSORIES CORP $1,064.64 PRINTER SUPPLIES m 152157 CONNELL GM PARTS/DIV. $48.67 TRUCK PARTS X 152168 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $3,780.22 ELECTRIC PARTS = 152159 CONSOLIDATED REPROGRAPHICS $79.74 PRINTING SERVICES CA 152160 CONSTRUCTION FABRICATORS,INC. $573.98 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES .-a 152181 CONSUMER PIPE E224.08 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 152162 CONTINENTAL EQUIPMENT 8 SUPPLY $155.21 TOOLS DO 152163 CONTROL SPECIALISTS INC $991.17 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 152164 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS O C $2.434.50 CONSULTING SERVICES M.0.8.11-93 N 152165 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $3.331.22 ENGINE PARTS 152166 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $195.35 TRUCK PARTS 152167 C S U F FOUNDATION $25,000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 162168 OCC I CAL INC $1,196.03 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 152169 J.W.OANGELO CO,INC. $491.34 VALVES 152170 DAPPER TIRE $123.70 TIRES 152171 JAMES DARLINGTON $4.312.50 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 162172 ALBERT W.DAVIES,INC. $686,908.66 CONSTRUCTION 3-36R 152173 DEL MAR ANALYTICAL $890.00 BIOSOUDS ANALYSIS 152174 DELTA PACKAGING PRODUCTS,INC. $145.00 LAB SUPPLIES 152175 DEZURICK AND/OR CS CO. $1,281.39 VALVES 152176 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $5,835.73 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 152177 DIVERSIFIED INSPECTIPN $2,68B.00 PUMP STATION INSPECTIONS 152178 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. E642.06 PAINT SUPPLIES 152179 EIM COMPANY,INC. $1.088.82 REPAIR 162180 EIMCO PROCESS EQUIPMENT CO. $9.099.49 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 152181 EMA SERVICES INC $12,500.00 CONSULTING SERVICES 152182 ESP NORTH $972.36 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 152183 ELDRIDGE PRODUCTS INC. $5,997.11 METER 152184 ELECTRA-BOND,INC. $619.58 REPAIR BEARING CARRIER FRAME 152185 ELECTRO NUMERICS INC $485.64 INDICATOR ENCLOSURE 152186 ELSINORE HOMES INC $940.00 DECK INSTALLATION 152187 EMERGENCY MGMT NETWORK $3.340.00 CPRmRST AID TRAINING FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0524/96 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0529/96 POSTING DATE 0529196 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 152188 ENCHANTER,INC. $4,900.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5�24-95 162189 DAVE ENGSTROM $159.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 152190 DARRELL ENNIS $250.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 152191 FLUID TECH.SALES $314.18 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 152192 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $2.787.50 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O. 10.9-91 152193 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $434.45 AIR FREIGHT 152194 FISHER SCIENTIFICCO. $1.151.39 LAB SUPPLIES 152195 FLICKINGER CO $1,792.02 VALVE 152196 FLO-SYSTEMS $380AS PUMP PARTS 152197 FLUKE CORP. $9,568.52 LAN FLUKE ANALYZER 152198 TIM FOLEY $665.00 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 152199 FORD SAUVAJOT MGMT GROUP $2,810AS CONSOLIDATION SERVICES 152200 CLIFFORD A FORKERT $991.00 SURVEYING SERVICES MO 6-8-95 152201 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $178.29 PHOTO SUPPLIES 152202 CRY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $11,239.08 WATER USE 152203 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $60.78 PAINT SUPPLIES f1'1 152204 THE FOXBORO CO. $BD6.56 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES = 162205 FULL SPECTRUM ANALYTICS INC $18,737.74 LAB SUPPLIES W 152205 GST,INC. $365.91 OFFICE SUPPLIES 152207 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $105.45 LUMBER/HARDWARE -4 152208 GENERAL ELECTRIC MULTILIN $62.00 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES W 152209 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $530.37 ELECTRIC PARTS I 152210 GENERAL OCEANICS,INC. $264.61 LAB SERVICES W 152211 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $6.368.16 TELEPHONE SERVICES 152212 GIERLICH-MITCHELL,INC. $2,640.03 PUMP PARTS 152213 GILMORE'S $323.25 AUTO PARTS 152214 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $440.75 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 152218 DGA CONSULTANTS $7,680.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6.8-94 152216 GRIFFIN CARRICK $3,833.93 LEGAL SERVICES-TECHITE MO 9.27-95 152217 KEVIN HADDEN $231.70 EXPENSE REIM.FOR CASA CONF. 152218 HATCH$KIRK,INC. $39.16 TRUCK PARTS 152219 PL HAWN CO, INC. $06.00 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 152220 HERB'S BLACK FOREST BAKERY $87.60 TRAINING LUNCHEON 152221 HIGHWAY PRODUCTS $1.557.00 TOOLBOXES 162222 HILT],INC. $474.11 TOOLS 152223 HOKE CONTROLS DIVJHOKE INC. $488.45 VALVES 152224 HOME DEPOT $235.71 SMALL HARDWARE 152225 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $279.44 PAINT SUPPLIES 162226 HUNTINGTON AMC/JEEP/RENAULT $1.381.69 TRUCK PARTS 152227 HYDROTEX INC $3,922.27 LURE OIL 152228 IDM CONTROLS INC $1,776.61 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 152229 IPCO SAFETY $10,496.19 SAFETY SUPPLIES 152230 ISLUA CONFERENCE $476.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 152231 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $345.73 CONNECTORS 162232 INORGANIC VENTURES $800.00 LAB SUPPLIES 152233 INSTRUMENT LABORATORY $659.13 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 0524/98 PAGE4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0529I98 POSTING DATE 05I29/98 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 152234 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $108.11 WATER USE 152235 JP MORGAN SECURITIES $76,870.22 REMARKETING,1990-92 SERIES C COPS 152238 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $471.41 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 152237 JANUS INC $116.20 LAB SUPPLIES 152238 DEE JASPAR&ASSOC $1.163.32 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 152239 JAYS CATERING $815.16 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE 152240 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO. $125.95 GAUGE 152241 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $269.88 ELECTRIC PARTS 152242 JONES CHEMICALS,INC. $7,360.38 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE NO 4-26.95 152243 KMI INDUSTRIES $171.77 TECHLITE INSULATION 152244 KA13BARA ENGINEERING $3,038.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 152245 KEMIRON PACIFIC,INC. $57.587.58 FERRIC CHLORIDE MO 9.27-95 152240 KING BEARING,INC. $759.72 MACHINE SUPPLIES 162247 KLEINFELDER $4,028.85 GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTING SERVICES 152248 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $515,11 TOOLS 152249 ORANGE COUNTY DIVISION 6500.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES X 152250 LEE&RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC. $22.633.76 ENGINEERING SERVICES 2 152251 LIMITOROUE CORP. $227.95 ELECTRIC PARTS bd 162252 LOGIC MICRO CENTERS,LMS $1.074.75 TRAINING EQUIPMENT RENTAL r-, 152253 MDT BIOLOGIC COMPANY $1,413.00 LAB SUPPLIES --1 152254 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS 6100.13 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 1" 152255 DONALD F.MCINTYRE $112.15 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT I 152256 JE MEINHARD ASSOCIATES,INC. $792.58 LAB SUPPLIES r 152257 MELLON TRUST $14.845.71 CUSTODIAL BANK SERVICES 152258 MICROBE MASTERS $7,500.00 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 152259 MICROFLEX MEDICAL CORP $365.00 SAFETY SUPPLIES 152280 MIDWAY MFG.&MACHINING $3.415.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 152281 MISSION ABRASIVE SUPPLIES $117.09 RUBBER GLOVES 152282 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3.937.57 UNIFORM RENTALS 152263 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO. $220.00 INSTRUMENT 152264 MODERN DATA PRODUCTS $2.501.55 PRINTER SUPPLIES 152265 MICHAEL D.MOORE $430.73 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 152266 NAT WEST MARKETS 8750.D0 COP INTEREST DRAW FEES 152267 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES $10.522.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 152268 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $2,358.60 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 152269 NELSON DIVISION $554.06 MECHANICAL PARTS 15227D CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $47.58 WATER USE 152271 NICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY $12,176.20 LUBRICANTSIDIESEL FUEL 162272 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $439.57 SAFETY GLASSES 152273 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $5.435.70 OFFICE SUPPLIES 152274 OFFICE PAVILIONS/INTERIOR RESOURCES $4.199.58 OFFICE FURNITURE REPAIRS IS2275 THE OHMART CORP 51,47D.00 SAFETY TRAINING 152276 ORANGE COUNTY PUMP CO $822.80 ELECTRICAL PARTS 152277 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $273.18 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 152278 ORANGE COURIER $153.65 COURIER SERVICES 152279 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. $146.40 FIRINGS FUND NO 9199 • JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05R4196 PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05129M POSTING DATE 05129FA WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 162280 ORANGE COUNTY FORUM $160.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES 152281 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT $28.195.20 GAP WATER USE M.O.6-9.93 152282 PACIFIC INVESTMENT MGMT CO $118.164.00 INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT SERVICES 152283 PACIFIC PARTS $24.259.53 INSTRUMENT PARTS 152284 PACIFIC BELL $1,294.59 TELEPHONE SERVICES 152205 PAGENET $1.208.75 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 152286 PAINE WEBBER $61.394.89 REMARKET AGREE.FOR ADVANCE REFUNDING OF COPS 152287 PAK WEST $1,096.79 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 152288 PARKHOUSE TIRE,INC. $289.63 TIRES 152289 PERMA SEAL $559.72 LUBE OIL 152290 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $1,054A2 REIMB.PETTY CASH 152291 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $129,548.16 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3_29-95 152292 POLYPURE,INC. $21.022.20 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92 152293 POSITIVE FORMULATORS,INC. $197.23 CHEMICALS 152294 RSA SOIL PRODUCTS INC $795.00 SAWDUST 152295 RAMCO SPECIALTY PRODUCTS $767.49 PARTS CLEANER X 152296 RAIN FOR RENT $1,099.98 SEWER BY-PASS PIPING s 152297 BOLT DELIVERY AND/OR $24.00 DELIVERY SERVICE w 152298 GEORGE ROBERTSON $67.00 MILEAGE EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT .-� 162299 JOSEPH T RYERSON 6 SON IN $329.45 METAL 152300 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INrL SIB,667.38 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.68-94 DO 152301 R.CRAIG SC0TT 8 ASSOC. $53,373.17 LEGAL SERVICES-PERSONNEL ISSUES \n 152302 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $134.19 SPECIALTY GASES 152303 SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS,INC. $431.26 LAB REPAIRS 152304 STUART SEVERN $1,323.25 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 152305 SEWER EQUIP CO OF AMERICA $566.08 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 152306 SHAMROCK SUPPLY S65b1 TOOLS 162307 SHURELUCK SALES $18.824.68 TOOLSIHARDWARE IU308 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO. $114.32 LAB SUPPLIES 152309 SKYPARK WALK-N MEDICAL CLINIC $7,109.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 152310 SMITH-EMERY CO. $599.00 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-1394 152311 SOUTH COAST WATER $70.00 LAB SUPPLIES 152312 SO CALIF EDISON CO $29.895.14 POWER 152313 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $18,826.57 NATURAL GAS 152314 SPARUNG INSTRUMENT CO.,INC. $269.58 METER 152315 SUMMIT STEEL $280.15 METAL 152316 SUPER CHEM CORP. $606.10 CHEMICALS 152317 TEKTRONIX.INC. $2.911.90 INSTRUMENT PARTS 152318 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 582.42 MECHANICAL PARTS 152319 EDWARD M.TORRES $317.36 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 152320 TOWN CREATIVE SERVICES $474.75 MAIUNG SERVICES 152321 TREBOR ELECTRONICS $259.22 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 152322 TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY,INC. $0,549.84 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.O.5.11.94 152323 TRUCK 8 AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $510.11 TRUCK PARTS 152324 TRUESDAIL LABS $1.269.00 LAB SERVICES 152325 JG TUCKER B SON,INC. $1.825.72 INSTRUMENT PARTS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0524196 PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0529/96 POSTING DATE 0529196 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 152326 USPOSTAL SERVICE $5,000.00 POSTAGE 152327 UNISOURCEWOR BUTLER PAPER $7,618.73 OFFICE SUPPLIES 152328 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $1.524.14 PARCEL SERVICES 152329 VWR SCIENTIFIC $7,002.90 LAB SUPPLIES 162330 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $1.056.63 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 152331 VALVATE ASSOCIATES $635.53 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 152332 VORTEX INDUSTRIES $992.81 BUILDING REPAIRS 152333 W.S.SA. $225.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 152334 WAL-CON CONSTRUCTION CO. $131.839.40 CONSTRUCTION 5-37-3 152335 CARL WARREN 8 CO. $473.17 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR 152336 WEF $15.00 PUBLICATION 152337 WESTERN METRO UNIT $1,301.33 FILTERS 152338 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $20.934.97 CAUSTIC SODA MO 8-23-95 152339 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $578.17 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 152340 WHESSOE VAREC $4,494.73 VALVES m 152341 ROURKE,WOODRUFF 8 SPRADLIN $73,629.14 LEGAL SERVICES MO 7-26-95 X 152342 XEROX CORP. $26,471.97 COPIER LEASES 2 py TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 0529510 $2,827,888.66 1 UU Ol FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0524196 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0529M POSTING DATE 05rAM SUMMARY AMOUNT 01 CONST FUND $15.841.05 02 OPER FUND $6,391.90 02 CAP FAC FUND E3,518.D0 02 CONST FUND $41,999.82 #3 OPER FUND $16,850.89 03 CAP FAC FUND S702,378.56 93 CONST FUND $44,798.36 05 OPER FUND $2,210.77 #5 CONST FUND $4,414.11 #6 CONST FUND $7.662.86 #7 OPER FUND $4.071.34 #7 CAP PAC FUND 8213,956.59 #7 CONST FUND $9.930.21 911 OPER FUND $24.17 #11 CAP PAC FUND $63,940.85 m 611 CONST FUND $12,826.88 _ #13 CONST FUND $78.70 #14 OPER FUND $29.57 r-i M4 CAP FAC FUND $28.36 --I 014 CONST FUND $462.92 DO #3&11 OPER FUND $5.112.50 1 6586 OPER FUND $17.70 V #586 CAP FAC FUND $133.121.98 #687 OPER FUND $213.52 07814 OPER FUND $810.91 JT OPER FUND $649,841.92 CORF $468.108.82 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $65,555.09 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $353.691.31 52,827,888.68 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE-VARIOUS PAGE 1 c REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID-MISCELLANEOUS HANDWRITE WARRANTS WARRANT DATE WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 05/17/96 152067 BETTER FLOORS 8 RESTORATION $4,286.02 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 05/17/98 152068 JOHN CAROL-0 ENGINEERS $40,432.39 ENGINEERING SERVICES P138,J33 05/17/96 152069 DALY B FANNY FRIEDSTADT 99,097.16 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 05117196 152070 DIAL ONE GENE BELL INC. $418.00 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 05/17/96 152071 WATEREUSE ASSOCIATION $150.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 0511719B 152072 WORLD RESTORATION $2.112.27 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 05/20/95 152073 CMS,INC. $5.000.00 RETAINER FEE 05/20/96 152074 JAMESCOWAN $10820 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 0520/96 152075 KERRY CONSULTING GROUP $4.896.81 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MO I1-15-95 OW1196 152094 LOGIC MICRO CENTERS,LMS $913.13 TRAINING EQUIPMENT RENTAL 0522/98 152095 BARCLAYS RANK PLC $98.042.00 COP LIQUIDITY FEES 052em 162343 MTA USBC $150.00 INVESTMENT POUCY/REVIEW 0529M6 152344 TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION $179.95 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 05/30/96 152345 GARDEN GROVE UNIF.SCHOOL DIST $96.00 ROOM RENTAL 05/31/96 152346 THE BALBOA BAY CLUB $3.358.23 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 05131/96 152347 EMERCON CONSTRUCTION $648.76 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM m 05131MS 152348 PAULINE JOHNSTON $4,990.43 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM = 06/06/86 152371 AA.TECH $450.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING tz TOTAL CLAIMS PAID $175.329.15 - n 1 SUMMARY AMOUNT JT OPER FUND $108.00 CORP $45.329.20 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $24,910.87 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL SI04,981.08 $175.329.15 DATE PAID 05115/96 05/29/95 HANDWRITES ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - 873,862.52 649S,11.92 108.00 Capital Outlay Revolmg Fund - 1,129.139,06 468,108,82 45,329,20 Joint Working Capital Fund - 175,513.91 353,691.31 104,981.08 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 12,365.75 65,556.09 24.910,87 DISTRICT NO, 1 - 1,353.52 15.841,05 0.00 DISTRICT NO.2 - 5.966.70 51,209.72 0.00 DISTRICT NO.3 - 113.117.80 764.027,81 0.00 DISTRICT NO.5 - 4.340,63 6,624.88 0.00 DISTRICT NO.6 - 12,468.02 7,662,86 0.00 DISTRICT NO,7 - 15,375.16 227,958.14 0.00 DISTRICT NO.11 - 223,47609 76,79190 0,00 DISTRICT NO.13 - 0.00 78.70 0,00 DISTRICT NO.14 - 27.25 518,65 0,00 DISTRICTS NO.187 JOINT - O.00 0.00 0,00 DISTRICTS NO.3811 JOINT - 0.00 5.112.50 0,00 DISTRICTS NO.586 JOINT - 11,677.18 133,1396E 0.00 DISTRICTS NO B 7 JOINT - 5,043,13 213.52 0.00 DISTRICTS NO. 7 814 JOINT - 6,886.43 810.91 0.00 TOTALS 2,590,613.15 2,827,888.66 175,329.15 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE O5/14/98 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID O5115M POSTING DATE 05115/98 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 151784 A C&S $24,227.00 INSULATION REMOVAL-ENGINE EXHAUST PIPING&BOILS 151785 AVIS(ACOUSTICAL MAIL SERV) $1,063.71 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 151788 ASCE CONTINUING EDUCATION $664.28 TRAINING MATERIALS 151787 AT&T-MEGACOM SERVICE $2,966.96 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 151788 AT&T-PRO WATTS $910.56 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 151789 A T&T-CELLULAR OR&R $5.04 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 151790 A T&T-CELLULAR OR&R $11.97 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 151791 ABATIX ENVIRONMENTAL $816.50 SAFETY SUPPLIES 151792 ABRASIVE ENG.TOOLING&EQUIP. $239.19 HARDWARE 151793 AIR CLEANING SPECIALISTS INC $260.00 ELECTRIC PARTS 161794 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $36,651.01 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.O.S.989 151795 AIRBORNE EXPRESS $8.75 AIR FREIGHT 161796 AMERIDATA $147,154.041 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 151797 AMERICAN AIRLINES $5,871.75 TRAVEL SERVICES 151798 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION $27,610.16 SEWER REPAIRS 151799 BLAKE P.ANDERSON $671.88 REIMBURSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE&MEETING EXP. 161800 ANGEL SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS INC. $323.25 LAB SUPPLIES 151801 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL $330.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 151802 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $4,994.33 NOTICES&ADS 151803 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $2,021.31 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 1518D4 AQUATIC BIOASSAY&CONSULT $5,905.00 LAB SERVICES 151805 ARMOR-VAC $73&W VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 1518M ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. $135.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL 151807 ATKIWJONES COMPUTER SERVICE $321.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT 151808 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING 53,391.84 PAYROLL SERVICES 151809 AWARDS&TROPHIES $11.59 PLAGUES 151810 BFI MEDICAL WASTE SYSTEMS $5.50 WASTE DISPOSAL 151811 BKK LANDFILL $2.654.00 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10.9-91 151812 E S BABCOCK&SONS INC $2.295.00 LAB ANALYSIS 151813 BARNEBY-SUTCLIFFE CORP. $1,571.39 ELECTRIC PARTS 151814 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $413.89 BATTERIES 151815 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $692.52 LAB SUPPLIES 151816 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $456.55 TRUCK WASH TICKETS 161817 BON-ARUES $331.11 TRUCK PARTS 161878 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $18.475.76 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7.18-2 151810 BRENNER-FIEDLER&ASSOC.,INC. $123.69 GENERATORS 1518" BNI BOOKS $321.88 BOOKS 161821 CCI TECHNOLOGIES $5,881.00 PHONE LINE INSTALLATION 151822 CEPA $882.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 151823 C.P.I. $1.289.23 LAB SUPPLIES 151824 CS COMPANY $5,753.91 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 151825 CALTROL,INC. $1,498.11 HARDWARE 161828 CALIF ASSOC.OF SAN.AGENCIES $130.00 WORK CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 151827 CAMALI CORP. $800.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 151828 CANUS CORPORATION $24,782.50 FIBER OPTIC CABLE 151829 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $31.306.34 ENGINEERING SERVICES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05/14/98 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/15/96 POSTING DATE 05/15MS WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 151870 CASHCO $420.84 VALVE 151B31 MDT/CASTLE $368.95 LAB SUPPLIES 151832 CENTURY MICRO PRODUCTS $4,799.32 COMPUTER SUPPLIES&SOFTWARE 157833 CHEMWEST INC S976.70 PUMPS 151834 CLAYTON ENVIRO CONSULT $9,236.28 INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE SERVICES 151835 COLE-PARMER INSTRUMENT CO. $240.44 LAB SUPPLIES 151838 COUCH&SONS $191,606.33 CONSTRUCTION 11-17-1 151837 COLOR ARTS INC $4,941.18 PRINTING SERVICES 151838 COMMUNICATIONS PERFORMANCE GROUP $17,11M.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MO 10.2"5 151839 COMPUSERVE $322.54 COMPUTER SERVICES 151840 CONNELL GM PARTS/DIV. $142.31 TRUCK PARTS 161841 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $10,240.84 ELECTRIC PARTS 151842 CONSUMER PIPE $701.36 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 161843 CONTINENTAL EQUIPMENT B SUPPLY $88.76 TOOLS 1518" CONVERSE CONSULTANTS O C $17,714.34 CONSULTING SERVICES M.O.8-11.93 151845 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $951.29 ENGINE PARTS 151846 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $183.12 TRUCK PARTS 151847 COUNTY CLERK $38.00 NOTICE OF EXEMPTION FEE 151848 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $1,361.31 ELECTRIC PARTS 151849 CUMMINS-ALUSON CORP $961.20 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS 1518S0 DAILY PILOT $144.00 NOTICES BADS 151851 J.W.OANGELO CO,INC. $633.57 VALVES 151852 JAMES DARLINGTON $3,262.50 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 151853 DAVES BICYCLES,INC. $149.61 BIKE REPAIRS 151854 ALBERT W.DAVIES,INC. $25,177.77 CONSTRUCTION 335R 151855 DELL MARKETING L.P. $10,161.91 COMPUTERS 151858 DEL MAR ANALYTICAL $950.00 BIOSOUDS ANALYSIS 151857 DEZURICK AND/OR CS CO. $16,464.M VALVES 151858 DIAMOND LINERS INC $435.27 TRUCK BED LINER 151859 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $5,734.29 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 151800 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $940.00 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 151861 JIM DAVIDSON $403.70 CONFERENCE EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 151862 JAN DEBAY $174.00 CASA CONFERENCE REIMBURSEMENT 161083 ESP NORTH $930.51 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 1511154 ELE INTL/SOILTEST PROD $371.35 TOOLS 151865 ELECTRA-BOND,INC. $5,543.74 EQUIPMENT REPAIR 151856 ELECTRO NUMERICS INC $2.593.74 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 151887 ENCHANTER,INC. $2,800.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5.24-95 151888 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $976.20 LAB SERVICES 151859 FLUID TECH.SALES $816.80 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 151870 FMC CORPORATION $52,406.83 HYDROGEN PEROXIDE MO 9.14.94 151871 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $7,0m.75 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-491 161872 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $317.04 AIR FREIGHT 151873 FILTERSUPPLYCO. $685.83 FILTERS 161874 FIRSTCHOICE $778.29 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT 151875 FISCHER&PORTER CO. $7.030.69 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 IT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE O5IW98 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID O5115196 POSTING DATE 05/15M WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 151876 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $532.50 LAB SUPPLIES 151877 FLOSYSTEMS $19,164.59 PUMP PARTS 151878 FLORIDA CONVEYOR B EQUIP $1,537.89 MECHANICAL PARTS 151879 FORD SAUVAJOT MGMT GROUP $285.00 CONSOLIDATION SERVICES 151880 FORMA SCIENTIFIC,INC. $309.61 FREIGHTCHARGES 151081 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $168.37 PHOTO SUPPLIES 151882 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $449.26 PAINT SUPPLIES 161883 THE FOXBORO CO. $954.72 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 1518" FRANKLIN ELECTRONIC PUBLISHERS $244.63 PUBLICATIONS 161885 FRYS ELECTRONICS $3,596,12 ELECTRONIC 8 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 1518M FURON DEKORON $35468 CABLE 151887 GKK CORPORATION $10.525.11 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES J-11-2 151888 GST,INC. $688.24 OFFICE SUPPLIES 151889 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $623.48 LUMBER6IARDWARE 151890 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $3.648.15 CHEMICALS 151891 GE[NO$POWER SYSTEMS $9,746.80 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 161892 GENERAL ELECTRIC MULTILIN $235.43 RE-PROGRAM EQUIPMENT 151893 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $1,613.99 ELECTRIC PARTS 151894 GENERAL PETROLEUM $10,993.52 GASOLINE 161895 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1,699.27 TELEPHONE SERVICES 151896 GIERUCH-MITCHELL,INC. $20,166.15 PUMP PARTS 151897 W W GRAINGER,INC. $317.86 COMPRESSOR PARTS 151898 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $169.71 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 151699 GRASBYANDERSEN $2,437.28 ENGINE PARTS 151900 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC WHOLESALE $1,783.88 CABLEASSEMBLY 151901 DGA CONSULTANTS $6.737.58 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6$94 161902 KEVIN HADDEN $180.65 CONFERENCE EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 151903 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $I.SW.52 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 151904 HATCH 6 KIRK,INC. $24.35 TRUCK PARTS 161905 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS $2.625.00 CONTAINER RENTALS 151906 PL HAWN CO,INC. $696.67 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 151907 HERB'S BUCK FOREST BAKERY $435.10 TRAINING LUNCHEON 151908 HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT $2,083.33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN. 151909 HEWLETTPACKARD $510.74 SERVICE AGREEMENT 151910 HOME DEPOT $156.71 SMALL HARDWARE 151911 RS HUGHES CO, INC. $202.95 PAINT SUPPLIES 151912 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $10,314.99 WATER USE 151913 IPCO SAFETY $12,808.07 SAFETY SUPPLIES 151914 INDUSTRIAL FILTER MFG. $57.97 FILTER 151915 INDUSTRIAL METAL SUPPLY CO, $1,123.48 METAL 151916 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $99.75 CONNECTORS 151917 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $1,065.00 BATTERIES 151918 J2 PRINTING SERVICES $635.31 PRINTING 151919 JAMISON ENGINEERING $49,870.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 161920 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $968.39 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 151921 JAYS CATERING $873.78 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE FUND NO 91N - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05/14/96 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05115/96 POSTING DATE O5115I98 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 151922 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO. $126.08 GAUGE 151923 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $835.96 ELECTRIC PARTS 151924 JONES CHEMICALS,INC. $30,8W.61 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE NO 4-26-95 151925 JORDAN CONTROLS INC $121.62 REPAIR CIRCUIT BOARD 151926 KALLEEN'S COMPUTER PRODUCTS $239.77 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 151927 KEMIRON PACIFIC,INC. $144,615.93 FERRIC CHLORIDE MO 9.27-95 151920 KEYE PRODUCTIVITY CENTER $159.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 151929 KING BEARING,INC. $623.39 MACHINE SUPPLIES 151930 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $690.19 TOOLS 151931 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $1.280.44 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICE 151932 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY CO. $8,523.00 SAFETY SUPPLIES 151933 LAWICRANDAL,INC. $12,272.50 SOIL TESTING 7-13.94 151934 LEE&RID CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC. $54.286.83 ENGINEERING SERVICES 151935 PINKY E.LOPEZ $118.51 COMPUTER SUPPLIES REIMB. 151936 R.F.MACDONALD CO. $1,098.57 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 151937 MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY CORP. $1,046.73 MECHANICAL PARTS 151938 MANLEY'S BOILER REPAIR CO,INC $780.00 BOILER REPAIR 151939 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $702,757.00 CONSTRUCTION P1-36-2 151940 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $34.866.00 CONSTRUCTION P2-42-2 151941 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $26.89 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 151942 DONALD F.MCINTYRE $424.50 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 151943 MC JUNKIN CORP $3,854.69 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 151944 MCWELCO RACK-N-BOX CO $1,188.21 TOOLS 151945 MEDICAL BENEFITS $196.00 SUBSCRIPTION 151946 MES COMPANY $1,976.14 MECHANICAL PARTS 151947 MICROTEST INC $250.78 SCANNER REAPIR 151948 MIDWAY MFG.&MACHINING $6.045.09 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 151949 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3,125.80 UNIFORM RENTALS 151950 MOBILE HOSE AND HYDRAULIC $134.66 PUMP PARTS 151951 MONITOR LASS $311.50 INSTRUMENT 151952 MOTION INDUSTRIES,INC. $39.50 PUMP PARTS 151953 NATIONAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION $186.50 SOFTWARE 151954 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $1,666.43 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 161955 RORY NELSON $161.00 CWEA CONF.EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 1619M NETWORK GENERAL CORP. $22,937.37 COMPUTER 151957 NEWARK ELECTRONICS $57.76 INSTRUMENT PARTS 151958 HICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY $11.403.87 LUBRICANTSIDIESEL FUEL 151959 OI CORPORATION $240.74 LAB SUPPLIES 151960 OMNI WESTERN INC $493.73 TOOLS 151961 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL $1.013.65 CHEMICALS 151952 ORANGE COURIER $35.10 COURIER SERVICES 151963 ORIZ FIRE PROTECTION 54,383.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 161964 OXYGEN SERVICE $2,384.74 SPECIALTY GASES 151965 COUNTY OF ORANGE $60.00 ROLL CHANGE PROCESSING FEE 1519M COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $9,982.42 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP 151967 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT $31.692.90 GAP WATER USE M.O.6-9-93 FUND NO 9199 - .ITT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05/14/96 PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05115MS POSTING DATE 05/15616 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 151968 PSSI $5,624.10 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION 151969 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $44.79 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 161970 PACIFIC PARTS $20.164.86 INSTRUMENT PARTS 151971 PACIFIC BELL $131.56 TELEPHONE SERVICES 151972 PAGENET $1,053.11 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 151973 PALMIERI,TYLER,WIENER, $11.30 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.6-12-91 161974 PEGO SYSTEMS $834.48 HOSE 151975 PERVO PAINT 5664.64 PAINT 151975 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $1,313.74 REIMBURSE PETTY CASH 151977 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $130,139.13 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3-2"5 151978 PLANNING SOLUTIONS $750.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 151979 POLY ENTERPRISES INC $608.79 SAFETY SUPPLIES 161980 POLYPURE,INC. $38,789.12 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92 151981 PRECISION INDUSTRIES $968.80 INSTRUMENT PARTS 151982 PRESENTATION PRODUCTS $48D.23 OFFICE SUPPLIES 151983 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $96.00 ICE FOR SAMPLES 151984 PULSAFEEDER $3,692.00 PUMP PARTS 151985 PUMPING SOLUTIONS $1,300.50 PUMP 151986 QUALITY BUILDING SUPPLY $197A4 CONCRETE DYE 151087 RS MEANS CO.,INC. $1,122.67 PUBLICATION 161986 R M CONTROLS $129.85 INSTRUMENT PARTS 151989 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $223.96 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS 161990 R 8 R INSTRUMENTS $93.44 ELECTRIC PARTS 151991 RSA SOIL PODUCTS INC $795.00 SAWDUST 151992 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. S2.0D2.72 TRASH REMOVAL 151993 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO. $196.92 LAB SUPPLIES 1519" RED WING SHOES $113.78 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 161995 BOLT DELIVERY 554.25 FREIGHT 151996 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DIST $850.81 ELECTRIC PARTS 151997 RUSSELECTRIC $1,718.92 ELECTRIC PARTS 161998 RYAN-NERCO $580.99 METAL 151999 SAFETY WEST $591.39 INSTRUMENT PARTS 152000 SANCON ENGINEERING,INC. $5,200.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 1520Di SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS $981.29 ELECTRIC PARTS 162002 SCHWING AMERICA,INC. $385.15 PUMP PARTS 1520D3 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTL $59,046.89 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.64-94 152004 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $2,016.00 SPECIALTY GASES 152005 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $221.38 TOOLS 152008 SHASTA ELECTRIC $46,775.00 INSTALL CONDUIT 152007 SHEPHERD MACHINERY CO. $301.13 TRUCK PARTS 1520D8 SHURELUCKSALES $6,328.64 TOOLS/HARDWARE 152009 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO. $341.82 LAB SUPPLIES 162010 SKALAR,INC. $594.25 LAB SUPPLIES 152011 SKILL PATH SEMINARS $207.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 152012 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $205.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 162013 SMITH-EMERY CO. $431.00 S0IL TESTING M.O.7-13-94 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05/14/96 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/15M6 POSTING DATE 05/16/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 152014 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP. $1.237." TOOLS 152016 SOUTH COAST WATER $125.00 LAB SUPPLIES ISM16 SO CALIF EDISON CO $67,441.96 POWER 152017 SO CALIF EDISON CO $11,365.55 POWER 152018 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $19,199.23 NATURAL GAS 152019 SO.CALIF.WATER CO. $68.31 WATER USE 152020 STAMEN 2.SPASSOFF P.E. $2,400.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19.2 IM21 STANDARD SUPP&EQUIP CO $402.68 MECHANICAL PARTS 152022 STERLING ART $25.24 ARTSUPPUES 152023 SUMMIT STEEL $2,095.74 METAL 152024 SUNSET FORD $80.66 TRUCK PARTS 152025 SUNSET INDUSTRIAL PARTS $136.94 MECHANICAL PARTS 152026 SUPELCO,INC. $300.84 LAB SUPPLIES 152027 SUPERB ONE-HOUR PHOTO $29.54 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 152028 SUPER POWER PRODUCTS $517.20 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 152029 SYMCAS $47.50 CONSULTING SERVICES 152030 SYSCOM INC $6.000.00 INSTALLATION&TRAINING FOR NEW DATABASE SYSTEM 152031 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $2,680.10 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 152032 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $893.98 MECHANICAL PARTS 152033 TONY'S LOCK&SAFE SERVICE $1.139.95 LOCKS&KEYS 152034 ED TORRES $21423 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 152035 TOSHIBA INTERNATIONAL $76.31 INSTRUMENT PARTS 152036 TOUCHSTONE SOFTWARE CORP. $60.52 DIAGNOSTIC UPGRADE KIT 1WO37 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE,INC. $372.67 TRUCK PARTS 152038 TREBOR ELECTRONICS $1,108.27 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 152039 MITCH TRIVANOVICH $745.50 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 152040 TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY,INC. $7,298.84 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.O.&11-94 152041 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $931.93 TRUCK PARTS 152042 MUCK PARTS SUPPLY $169.81 TRUCK PARTS 152043 JG TUCKER&SON,INC. $2.715.26 INSTRUMENT PARTS 152044 TUSTIN DODGE $56.87 TRUCK PARTS 152045 UNISOURCE&/OR BUTLER PAPER $50.97 OFFICE SUPPLIES 162046 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $425.01 PARCEL SERVICES 152047 VWR SCIENTIFIC $2.84825 LAB SUPPLIES 152048 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $4.392.99 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 152049 VERNES PLUMBING $110.00 PLUMBING SERVICES 152OW VERTEX TECHNOLOGIES,INC. $49D.48 FIBER OPTICS 152051 WACKENHUT CORP. $3,389.69 CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS 152052 WARD/DAVIS COMMUNICATIONS $7.205.80 FIBER OPTIC TEST KIT 152053 CARL WARREN&CO. $300.00 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR 152054 WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION $34.50 PUBLICATION 152055 WATERMAN SUPPLY $767.72 CHAIN 152056 WEAVER&THOMAS $297.47 PERMIT REFUND 152067 MRS.WILLIAM WELTER $193.13 PERMIT REFUND 152058 WESTERN METRO UNIT $1,743.31 FILTERS 152059 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $30.229.69 CAUSTIC SODA MO&23-95 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05114/% PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID O5115/B6 POSTING DATE 05115M WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 152060 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $114.84 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 152061 WESCO $371.74 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 152002 NANCY WNEATLEY $611.38 MEETING EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 152063 JUDRNAWILSON $106B7 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 152064 WIRE MARKERS,INC. $504.91 FIBER OPTIC TOOLS 152065 ROURKE,WOODRUFF&SPRADLIN $7.570.00 LEGAL SERVICES MO 7-26-95 152066 WORDPERFECT $39B0 SUBSCRIPTION TOTAL CLAIMS PAID O5/15196 $2.590.613.15 SUMMARY AMOUNT #1 OPER FUND $1.363.52 #2 OPER FUND $5,966.70 #3 OPER FUND $58,576.08 #3 CAP FAC FUND $54,541.72 95 OPER FUND $4,340.63 06 OPER FUND 372.68 #8 CAP FAC FUND $12.395.34 W OPER FUND $14,518.55 #7 CAP FAC FUND $858.81 #11 OPER FUND $12,170.67 011 CAP FAC FUND $211.305.42 #14 CAP FAC FUND $27.26 05&6 OPER FUND $2,380.22 95&6 CAP FAC FUND $9.296S6 #8&7 OPER FUND $5,043.13 #7&14 OPER FUND $6,886.43 JT OPER FUND $873,862.52 CORE $1,129.139.06 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $12,365.75 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $175.513.91 $2.590.613.15 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0524/98 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0529M POSTING DATE 0529M6 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 152098 ASS LOGISTICS CENTER $3,240.05 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 152087 ACS PUBLICATIONS $169.86 PUBLICATION 152098 ASL CONSULTING ENGINEERS $480.00 ATWOOD SUBTRUNK PLAN PREPARATION 152099 A T&T-MEGACOM SERVICE $703.56 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 152100 AT&T-CELLULARCR&R $13.27 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 152101 A T&T-CELLULAR OR&R $8.77 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 152102 ABRASIVE ENG.TOOLING&EQUIP. $189.60 HARDWARE 152103 ACCOUNTANTS OVERLOAD $2,651.20 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 152104 ACTION DOOR REPAIR CORP. $324.93 DOOR REPAIRS 162105 ADMOR MEMORY $1,805.17 COMPUTER PARTS 152105 TERRYAHN $329.54 CONFERENCE EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 152107 AIR CLEANING SERVICES CO $1.465.22 FILTERS 152108 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $18,328.78 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.O.8-939 162109 AIRBORNE EXPRESS $182.75 AIR FREIGHT 152110 AMERIDATA $8,168.51 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 152111 AMERICAN SIGMA $350.66 MISCELLANEOUS HARDWARE 162112 AMOCO ENERGY TRADING $37.802.61 NATURAL GAS MO 6-28-95 152113 ANGELUS PACIFIC CO.,INC. $203.79 CARPOOL TAGS 152114 ANIXTER-DISTRIBUTION $4.637.34 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 162116 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $11,633.08 NOTICES&ADS 152116 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE,INC. - $626.32 TOXIC WASTE REMOVAL 152117 AUTODESK INC $424.71 SOFTWARE 152118 AWARDS&TROPHIES $24.24 PLAQUES 152119 BC WIRE ROPE&RIGGING $182.22 AUTO PARTS 152120 E S BABCOCK&SONS INC $810.00 LAB ANALYSIS 152121 BANANA BLUEPRINT $8,201.03 PRINTINGM.O.11-07-94 152122 BARNES&NOBLE BOOKS $366.54 PUBLICATIONS 152123 BATTERY SPECLALTIES $949.90 BATTERIES 182124 BAUER COMPRESSOR $162.49 COMPRESSOR PARTS 152125 BAYSHORE PSYCHOLOGY CENTER $170.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 152126 BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS $85.52 LAB EQUIPMENT 162127 BIOGRO DIVISION $87,221.86 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 4-26415 15212E BUDGET JANITORIAL $3,330.00 JANITORIAL SERVICES MO 1-12-94 152129 THE BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFFAIRS $769.34 SUBSCRIPTION ON CD 152130 BUSH&ASSOCIATES,INC. $678.00 SURVEYING SERVICES MO 83-94 152131 CEM CORPORATION $643.61 LAB SUPPLIES 152132 CH2M HILL $216,213.02 ENGINEERING SERVICES J31 152133 C.L.TECHNOLOGY $720.00 GAS ANALYSIS SERVICES 152134 C.P.I. $1.060.80 LAB SUPPLIES 152135 CPU COMPUTER REPAIR $221.15 COMPUTER REPAIR 152136 CS COMPANY $6,335.89 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 152137 CWCI $21.01 PUBLICATIONS 152136 THE CALBOND JOURNAL $59.00 SUBSCRIPTION 152139 CALFON CONSTRUCTION $213,870.95 CONSTRUCTION 7-22&7-24 152140 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH INC. $74.02 LAB SUPPLIES 152141 CAMAU CORP. $2.575.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0524/96 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0529/96 POSTING DATE 05/29/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 152142 CANUS CORPORATION $24,750.00 FIBER OPTIC CABLE 152143 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $94.176.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES P138,J-33 1521U CASA $130.00 REGISTRATION-KEVIN MADDEN 152145 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $996.69 OFFICE FURNITURE 152M CENTURY MICRO PRODUCTS $6.895.92 COMPUTER PARTS 152147 CERFNET $20.00 COMPUTER SERVICES 152148 CERTEK ELECTRONICS INC $969.09 COMPUTER REPAIR 152149 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $300.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 152150 COAST INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO. $43.96 MISCELLANEOUS HARDWARE 152151 COLD SAWS OF AMERICA,INC. $26A5 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 152152 COUCH&SONS $30.292.20 CONSTRUCTION M-044 152153 COLICH&SONS $59,396.00 CONSTRUCTION 11-17-1 152154 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $1,794.36 PUMP PARTS 152155 COMPUTERS AMERICA $208.72 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 152156 COMPUTERS AND ACCESSORIES CORP $1,054.64 PRINTER SUPPLIES 152157 CONNELL GM PARTS/DIV. $48.67 TRUCK PARTS 152158 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $3.780.22 ELECTRIC PARTS 152159 CONSOLIDATED REPROGRAPHICS $79.74 PRINTING SERVICES 152150 CONSTRUCTION FABRICATORS,INC. $573.98 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 152161 CONSUMER PIPE $224.06 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 152162 CONTINENTAL EQUIPMENT B SUPPLY $15521 TOOLS 152163 CONTROL SPECIALISTS INC $991.17 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 152164 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS O C $2.434.50 CONSULTING SERVICES M.O.8-11-93 152165 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $3,33122 ENGINE PARTS 152166 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $196.36 TRUCK PARTS 152167 C S U F FOUNDATION $25.000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 152168 DCC/CAL INC $1,196.03 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 152169 J.W.DIANGELO CO,INC. $491.34 VALVES 152170 DAPPER TIRE $123.70 TIRES 152171 JAMES DARLINGTON $4,312.50 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 152172 ALBERT W.DAVIES,INC. $686.908.68 CONSTRUCTION 336R 152173 DELMAR ANALYTICAL $890.00 BIOSOLIDS ANALYSIS 152174 DELTA PACKAGING PRODUCTS,INC. $145.00 LAB SUPPLIES 152175 DEZURICK AND/OR CS CO. $1,281.39 VALVES 152176 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $5.835.73 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 152177 DIVERSIFIED INSPECTION $2,668.00 PUMP STATION INSPECTIONS 152178 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $642.06 PAINT SUPPLIES 162179 EIM COMPANY,INC. $1,D88.82 REPAIR 162180 EIMCO PROCESS EQUIPMENT CO. $9,D99.49 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 152101 EMA SERVICES INC $12,500.00 CONSULTING SERVICES 152182 ESP NORTH $972.36 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 152183 ELDRIDGE PRODUCTS INC. $5,997.11 METER 152184 ELECTRA-BOND,INC. $619.56 REPAIR BEARING CARRIER FRAME 152185 ELECTRO NUMERICS INC $486.64 INDICATOR ENCLOSURE 152186 ELSINORE HOMES INC $940.00 DECK INSTALLATION 152187 EMERGENCY MGMT NETWORK $3,340.00 CPRIFIRST AID TRAINING FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0524196 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0529/96 POSTING DATE 0529/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 152188 ENCHANTER,INC. $4,900.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5-24-95 152189 DAVE ENGSTROM $169.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 152190 DARRELL ENNIS $250.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 152191 FLUID TECH.SALES $314.18 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 152192 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $2,787.50 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O. 10.9-91 152193 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $434.45 AIR FREIGHT 152194 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $1.151.39 LAB SUPPLIES 152195 FLICKINGERCO $1,78202 VALVE 152198 FLOSYSTEMS $380.16 PUMP PARTS 152197 FLUKE CORP. $9,558.52 LAN FLUKE ANALYZER 152198 TIM FOLEY $685.00 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 152199 FORD SAUVAJOT MGMT GROUP $2,810.48 CONSOLIDATION SERVICES 152200 CLIFFORD A FORKERT $991.00 SURVEYING SERVICES MO 6.8-95 152201 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $17829 PHOTO SUPPLIES 152202 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $11.239.08 WATER USE 152203 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $60.78 PAINT SUPPLIES 152204 THE FOXBORO CO. $805.56 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 152205 FULL SPECTRUM ANALYTICS INC $16.737.74 LAB SUPPLIES 152206 EST,INC. $365.91 OFFICE SUPPLIES 152207 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $106.45 LUMBER(HARDWARE 152208 GENERAL ELECTRIC MULTILIN $62.00 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 162209 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $530.37 ELECTRIC PARTS 152210 GENERA OCEANICS,INC. $254.61 LAB SERVICES 152211 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $5.368.15 TELEPHONE SERVICES 162212 GIERLICH-MITCHELL,INC. $2.640.03 PUMP PARTS 152213 GILMORIF$ $3Z4.25 AUTO PARTS 152214 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $440.75 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 152215 DGA CONSULTANTS $7,680.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6894 IS2216 GRIFFIN CARRICK $3,833.93 LEGAL SERVICES-TECHITE M09-27-95 152217 KEVIN HADDEN $231.70 EXPENSE REIM.FOR CASA CONF. 152218 HATCH&KIRK,INC. $39.16 TRUCK PARTS 152219 PL HAWN CO,INC. $466.00 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 152220 HERB'S BLACK FOREST BAKERY $87.50 TRAINING LUNCHEON 162221 HIGHWAY PRODUCTS $1.557.00 TOOLBOXES 152222 HILTI,INC. $474.11 TOOLS 152223 HOKE CONTROLS DNJHOKE INC. $MAS VALVES 152224 HOME DEPOT $235.71 SMALL HARDWARE 152226 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $279.44 PAINTSUPPLIES 152226 HUNTINGTON AMC/JEEP l RENAULT $1,351.69 TRUCK PARTS 152227 HYDROTEXINC $3.922.27 LUBE OIL 152228 IDM CONTROLS INC $1.776.61 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 152229 IPCO SAFETY $10.496.19 SAFETY SUPPLIES 162230 ISLUA CONFERENCE $475.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 152231 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $345.73 CONNECTORS 152232 INORGANIC VENTURES $800.00 LAB SUPPLIES 152233 INSTRUMENT LABORATORY $W9.13 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0524/96 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 052W96 POSTING DATE 0529M WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 152234 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $108.11 WATER USE 152235 JP MORGAN SECURITIES $75,870.22 REMARKETING,1990�92 SERIES C COPS 152236 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $471.41 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 152237 JANUS INC $116.20 LAB SUPPLIES 162238 DEE JASPAR&ASSOC $1,163.32 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 152239 JAYS CATERING $815.16 DIRECTORSMEETING EXPENSE 162240 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO. $125.95 GAUGE 152241 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $269.88 ELECTRIC PARTS 152242 JONES CHEMICALS,INC. $7,360,36 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE MO 4-26-95 152243 KMI INDUSTRIES $171.77 TECHLITE INSULATION 162244 KABBARA ENGINEERING $3,038.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 152245 KEMIRON PACIFIC,INC. $67,587.58 FERRIC CHLORIDE MO 9-27-95 152246 KING BEARING,INC. $759.72 MACHINE SUPPLIES 152247 KLEINFELDER $4,028.85 GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTING SERVICES 152248 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $515.11 TOOLS 152249 ORANGE COUNTY DIVISION $600.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES 152250 LEE&RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC. $22,633.76 ENGINEERING SERVICES 152251 LIMITOROUE CORP. $227.95 ELECTRIC PARTS 162252 LOGIC MICRO CENTERS,LMS $1,074.76 TRAINING EOUIPMENT RENTAL 152253 MDT BIOLOGIC COMPANY $1.413.00 LAB SUPPLIES 152254 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $100.13 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 152255 DONALD F.MCINTYRE $112.16 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 152255 JE MEINHARD ASSOCIATES,INC. $792.58 LAB SUPPLIES 152257 MELLON TRUST $14.845.71 CUSTODIAL BANK SERVICES 152258 MICROBE MASTERS $7,500.00 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 152259 MICROFLEX MEDICAL CORD $366.00 SAFETY SUPPLIES 152260 MIDWAY MFG.&MACHINING $3,415.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 152261 MISSION ABRASIVE SUPPLIES $117.09 RUBBER GLOVES 152262 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3,937.57 UNIFORM RENTALS 162263 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO. $220.00 INSTRUMENT 152264 MODERN DATA PRODUCTS $2,601.55 PRINTER SUPPLIES 152265 MICHAEL D.MOORE $430.73 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 152266 NAT WEST MARKETS $750.00 COP INTEREST DRAW FEES 152267 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES $10.522.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 152258 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $2.356.60 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 152269 NELSON DIVISION $554.06 MECHANICAL PARTS 152270 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $47.58 WATER USE 152271 NICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY $12,176.20 LUBRICANTSIDIESEL FUEL 162272 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $439.57 SAFETY GLASSES 152273 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $5,435.70 OFFICE SUPPLIES 162274 OFFICE PAVILIONSANTERIOR RESOURCES $4,199.56 OFFICE FURNITURE REPAIRS 15=5 THE OHMART CORP $1.470.00 SAFETYTRAINING 152276 ORANGE COUNTY PUMP CO $822.80 ELECTRICAL PARTS 152277 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $273.18 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 152278 ORANGE COURIER $153.65 COURIER SERVICES 152279 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. $146.40 FITTINGS FUND NO 9199 - Jr DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0624/96 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0SrM95 POSTING DATE 05129M WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 152280 ORANGE COUNTY FORUM $160.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES 152281 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT S28,195.20 GAP WATER USE M.O.6-9.93 152282 PACIFIC INVESTMENT MGMT CO $118,164.00 INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT SERVICES 152283 PACIFIC PARTS $24.259.53 INSTRUMENT PARTS 152264 PACIFIC BELL $1.294.59 TELEPHONE SERVICES 152285 PAGENET $1,208.75 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 152286 PAINE WEBBER $61,394.69 REMARKET AGREE.FOR ADVANCE REFUNDING OF COPS 152287 PAK WEST $1,096.79 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 152288 PARKHOUSE TIRE,INC. $289.63 TIRES 162289 PERNA SEAL $559.72 LUSE OIL 152290 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $1,054.12 REIMB.PETTY CASH 152291 PIMA GIRD SYSTEMS.INC. $129,548.16 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3-29M 152292 POLYPURE,INC. $21,022.20 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3.11-92 152293 POSITIVE FORMULATORS,INC. $197.23 CHEMICALS 152294 RSA SOIL PRODUCTS INC $795.00 SAWDUST 152295 RAMCO SPECIALTY PRODUCTS $767.49 PARTS CLEANER 152296 RAIN FOR RENT $1,099.98 SEWER BY-PASS PIPING 152297 BOLT OELNERYAND/OR $24.00 DELIVERY SERVICE 152298 GEORGE ROBERTSON $87.00 MILEAGE EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 152299 JOSEPH T RYERSON&SON IN $328.45 METAL 152300 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTL $18,667.36 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.641-94 162301 R.CRAIG SCOTT&ASSOC. $53,373.17 LEGAL SERVICES-PERSONNEL ISSUES 152302 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $134.19 SPECIALTY GASES 152303 SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS,INC. $431.25 LAB REPAIRS 152304 STUART SEVERN $1,323.25 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 152305 SEWER EQUIP CO OF AMERICA $566.08 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 152308 SHAMROCKSUPPLY $65.51 TOOLS 152307 SHURELUCK SALES $18,624.66 TOOLS/HARDWARE 15230E SIGMA CHEMICAL CO. $114.32 LAB SUPPLIES 152309 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $7.109.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 152310 SMITH-EMERY CO. $599.00 SOIL TESTING M.0.7-13.94 152311 SOUTH COAST WATER $70.00 LAB SUPPLIES 152312 SO CALIF EDISON CO $29,895.14 POWER 152313 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $18,826.57 NATURAL GAS 152314 SPARLING INSTRUMENT CO.,INC. $269.88 METER 162316 SUMMIT STEEL $280.15 METAL 152316 SUPER CHEM CORP. $606.10 CHEMICALS 152317 TEKTRONIX.INC. $2,911.90 INSTRUMENT PARTS 152318 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $82A2 MECHANICAL PARTS 152319 EDWARD M.TORRES $317.36 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 152320 TOWN CREATIVE SERVICES $474.76 MAILING SERVICES 152321 TREBOR ELECTRONICS $259.22 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 162322 TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY,INC. $6,549.84 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.O.5-71-94 152323 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $510.11 TRUCK PARTS 152324 TRUESDAIL LABS $1,269.00 LAB SERVICES 152325 JG TUCKER&SON,INC. $1,826.72 INSTRUMENT PARTS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05/24/96 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID O6129/96 POSTING DATE 05/29/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 152326 USPOSTAL SERVICE $5,000.00 POSTAGE 152327 UNISOURCEWOR BUTLER PAPER $7,618.73 OFFICE SUPPLIES 152320 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $1,524.14 PARCEL SERVICES 152329 VWR SCIENTIFIC $7.082.90 LAB SUPPLIES 152330 VALLEY CRIES SUPPLY CO. $1.056.63 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 152331 VALVATE ASSOCIATES $635.53 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 152332 VORTEX INDUSTRIES $992.81 BUILDING REPAIRS 152333 W.S.SA $225.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 152334 WAL-CON CONSTRUCTION CO. $131,839.40 CONSTRUCTION 5-37.3 152336 CARLWARREN&CO. $473.17 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR 152336 WEF $16.00 PUBLICATION 152337 WESTERN METRO UNIT $1,301.33 FILTERS 152338 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $20.934.97 CAUSTIC SODA MO 8-23-95 ISMS WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $578.17 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 152340 WHESSOE VAREC $4,494.73 VALVES 152341 ROURKE,WOODRUFF&SPRADUN $73,629A4 LEGAL SERVICES MO 7-26-96 152342 XEROX CORP. $26,471.97 COPIER LEASES TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 0528/88 $2.827,888.66 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05M4/96 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05,29/96 POSTING DATE 0528/9S SUMMARY AMOUNT #1 CONST FUND $15.841.05 02 OPER FUND $6,391.90 #2 CAP FAC FUND $3,618.00 #2 CONST FUND $41,999.82 #3 OPER FUND $16,850.89 #3 CAP FAC FUND $702,378.66 #3 CONST FUND $44.798.36 #5 OPER FUND $2,210.77 05 CONST FUND $4,414.11 06 CONST FUND $7.662.86 07 OPER FUND $4,071.34 #7 CAP FAC FUND $213.956.69 #7 CONST FUND $9.930.21 #11 OPER FUND $24.17 #11 CAP FAC FUND $63.940.85 #11 CONST FUND $12,826.88 #13 CONST FUND $78.70 #14 OPER FUND $29.57 014 CAP FAC FUND $26.36 #14 CONST FUND $462.92 #3&11 OPER FUND $5,112.50 #566 OPER FUND $17.70 #S66 CAP PAC FUND $133,121.98 #687 OPER FUND $213,62 #7814 OPER FUND $810,91 JT OPER FUND $649,841.92 CORF $46B,108.82 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $65.556.09 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $353,691.31 $2.827,888.66 FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE-VARIOUS PAGE1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID-MISCELLANEOUS HANDWRITE WARRANTS WARRANT DATE WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 05/17/96 152067 BETTER FLOORS B RESTORATION $4,286.02 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 05/17/96 152068 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $40,432.39 ENGINEERING SERVICES P7-38,J-33 05/17/96 152069 DALYB FANNY FRIEDSTADT $9.097.16 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 05117M 152070 DIAL ONE GENE BELL INC. 5418.00 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 05117196 152071 WATEREUSE ASSOCIATION $150.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 05/17/96 152072 WORLD RESTORATION $2.112.27 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 0520/96 152073 CMS,INC. 55,000.00 RETAINER FEE 05/20/96 152074 JAMES COWAN $106.00 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT O5120/96 152075 KERRY CONSULTING GROUP $4,896.81 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MO I1-15-95 0521196 152094 LOGIC MICRO CENTERS,LMS $913.13 TRAINING EQUIPMENT RENTAL 05/2m 152095 BARCLAYS BANK PLC 598,042.00 COP LIQUIDITY FEES O829/96 152343 NITA USBC $150.00 INVESTMENT POLICY/REVIEW 0529/96 152344 TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION $179.95 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT O5130MG 152US GARDEN GROVE UNIF.SCHOOL DIST $96.00 ROOM RENTAL O5131/96 152346 THE BALBOA BAY CLUB $3,368.23 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 05/31198 152347 EMERCON CONSTRUCTION $648.76 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 05J31/96 152348 PAULINE JOHNSTON $4.990.43 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 06/OB/96 152371 A.D.TECH $450.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING TOTAL CLAIMS PAID $175,329.15 SUMMARY AMOUNT JTOPERFUND $108.00 CORF $45,329.20 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $24,910.87 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $104,981.08 $175,329.15 STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, 1 hereby certify that the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 held on /)Z +- ( d 192�-, was duly posted for public inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this,2L:Lday of i Penny Kyle, See eta pp each of the Boards of Direct rs oI unty Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, , 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14 of Orange County, California WS o'msI M COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA •June 19, 1996 To the Chair and Members plat 96°2zf 411 of the Joint Boards of Directors aWi,p.agrees: Subject: Board Letter P.D.Box 8127 rclnben veW cA 9272BE127 atr.x The following are items that you may find interesting. If you need additional loan as A n.a information on any of the items, please call me. ft,w.vaeay.CA 9270B-701a Natural Gas Purchase There is an item on the agenda from the OMTS Committee re an agreement to purchase natural gas from PanEnergy. With new natural gas providers available to Member us, staff solicited proposals from the various suppliers and is recommending an Agencies agreement with PanEnergy. At the OMTS Committee meeting, the Directors asked for additional information on this firm and we offer the following: Citles anane;m PanEnergy is a company that has been transporting natural gas for 65 years. They area have assets of$7.5 billion. PanEnergy recently formed a joint venture with Mobil to Buena ParkC,P market natural as. The combined strength of PanEnergyand Mobil will create the Ea"nten V u, third largest gas marketers in the U.S. PanEnergy transports 225,000 million BTUs E"Ilertan per day into the California market and maintains substantial storage in Southern Hantington Beath ne California. Their California ia sales office is located in Irvine. Additional information on a La Habra the firm is included in an attachment. La Palma Les Alamltaa Neepart South FY '96-97 Training Calendar Orange Patent.Sena Ana Attached are the '96-97 Districts-wide training calendar as well as course Seal Beath descriptions. Our Training Division has done an outstanding job identifying needs Anton and planning courses to ensure that those needs are met. If you have any rasbn Vlla Park questions on this information, please contact our Training Manager, Linda Eisman. Yorba Linda County of orange Orange County CAD's Response to Request for Return of Deposit re Landfill Acquisition Sanitary Districts Attached is a copy of the May 29, 1996 letter denying our request that the $100,000 Carta Mesa non-refundable deposit be returned. As we expected, the CAD does not agree that aa, d,,Orove the Count failed to negotiate in good faith. Staff is evaluating what steps, if an Mienay b Y 9 9 9 P Y, should be taken as a result of this response. Water pisb:cta nnna Ranth Personnel Changes - I am pleased to announce that Michael Peterman has been appointed Director of Human Resources. Mike has been acting as interim Director of HR since April and has done an outstanding job. As you may remember, Mike came to the Districts as Human Resources Supervisor from the Orange County Water District. A Pubk Wastewater and E,r"nmental Management Agency Committee to Pr"tet4,y the Ennrenment S,bce 1954 Chair and Members of the Joint Boards of Directors Page 2 June 19, 1996 1 also want to advise you that Steve Hovey resigned as manager of Information Technology. A specialty recruiting firm will be hired to fill this position, as well as the position of manager of Plant Automation. SAWPA Agreement Finally, there is an agreement with SAWPA. Their Commission approved the agreement on June 11 and it is now being sent to all SAWPA members for ratification. The final agreement will be considered at the July Joint Boards' meeting. Bolsa Chica State Beach Closure Attached is a fax received from the California State Parks, Department of Parks and Recreation. We are continuing to work closely with local officials State Park and the County Health Department to correct the problems with the State's sewer lines. Constitution Revision Commission fCRCI Update from CASA CASA has provided its members with an update on the recent activities of the State's CRC. The CRC formally introduced two measures to implement their recommendations on revising the State's constitution, but so far the bills have not been assigned to committee. While the CRC was scheduled to disband by June 30, it appears there is some movement to extend the life of the Commission until January 1997. The attached fax, dated June 3, 1996, details some of the recent CRC's activities. CRWQCB Administrative Civil Liability for Sewage Spill into Newport Bay Attached is a copy of a May 28, 1996 letter to the CRWQCB requesting that the monies we paid as a penalty be used to assist with the problems at Bolsa Chica State Beach. The CRWQCB has considered our request and has agreed to consider it. Also attached is a June 7, 1996 letter from CRWQCB responding to our request and granting a delay in paying the assessment until January 1, 1997, with the possibility of an extension beyond January 1 if there is a delay by the California Department of Parks and Recreation in reimbursing our costs. New Southern California Coastal Waters Research Project fSCCWRPI Executive Director Dr, Steven Weisberg has been appointed executive director of SCCWRP effective July 1, 1996. Dr. Weisberg previously served as the Manager of Monitoring and Field Operations as Versar, Inc., a large environmental consulting firm located in Chair and Members of the Joint Boards of Directors Page 3 June 19, 1996 Columbia, Maryland. During his tenure at Versar, Dr. Weisberg was involved in a variety of regional and national environmental monitoring programs. He was instrumental in the design and implementation of EPA's Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program in the mid-Atlantic region. He has developed indices to measure the ecological condition of benthic and fish communities in Delaware and Maryland and has developed restoration goals for Chesapeake Bay. For the last two years, Dr. Weisberg has been co-editor of the Southern California Bight Pilot Project, a regional monitoring effort involving the four major wastewater dischargers in Southern California, including the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. Dr. Weisberg brings his extensive experience in both scientific research and project management to guide SCCWRP towards the future. He earned his Ph.D. in Biology from the University of Delaware. Results of Directors' Workshop Questionnaire Attached are the results of the questionnaire on the two workshops held on the Strategic Plan to date. Staff will be using this information to help plan future workshops. I want to thank all of the Directors who have attended the first two sessions, and encourage everyone to attend future workshops. The next workshop is tentatively scheduled for Saturday, September 21. Power Outages at Plant 2 On Saturday, June 1 at 3:51 a.m. and again on Thursday, June 6 at 10:13 a.m, Plant 2 lost Edison and Central Power Generation System power. These power outages affected the equipment that controls flow through the treatment plant. In both cases, the fast response by Operations and Maintenance staff prevented the discharge of treated and untreated water into the Santa Ana River. Staff is working with SCE to evaluate the causes and to determine a course of action to avoid this happening again. Attached is a copy of a June 13, 1996 memo from Doug Cook, Chief Operator at Plant No. 2, to Plant 2 Operations and Maintenance staff commending them for their quick thinking during these emergencies. In what might be considered a related story, attached is an article from the May 19, 1996 Register on disruptions of service in Northern California experienced by customers of PG&E. Hopefully, we will not have the same kind of experience with SCE! Core Value Committee's Guiding Principles Roll-out On Wednesday and Thursday, June 19 and 20, all employees attended presentations by the Core Values Committee wherein the Guiding Principles for the Districts were introduced. The meetings were video-taped and will be presented Chair and Members of the Joint Boards of Directors Page 4 June 19, 1996 during future new employee orientations. We are attaching a copy of the two handouts prepared for those meetings. I also discussed five issues that will not be tolerated at the Districts: sexual harassment, theft, violence in the workplace, weapons on site, and drug and alcohol use while on the job. Employees were reminded of the existing Employee Assistance Program if they need help. Uodate on Watershed Management The National Academy of Sciences' new Committee on Watershed Management has been appointed, and its first meeting was held on May 30-31 in Washington, D.C. Blake Anderson was appointed to the committee, as reported in a previously Board letter. The committee will explore the opportunities and constraints associated with watershed-scale management approaches and consider how to better integrate the ecological, social, and economic dimensions of such approaches. The study will explore watershed processes, problems, and decision models, and it will examine the institutional barriers that inhibit successful implementation of watershed management activities. This study is designed to provide practical advice to federal, state and local regulators, planners, and interested citizens who, while perhaps enthusiastic about the potential of watershed management, must make increasingly difficult decisions about setting priorities and allocating resources. This issue is important to the Sanitation Districts and other local government entities because watershed management implies a new paradigm for water quality and other resource management. Locally-based decisions that balance the economic, environmental and community values of a region are used to tailor public policy. This replaces the existing practice of using compliance with federal mandates and programs such as the primary litmus test of a decision. The challenge is to establish watershed management that allows for flexibility while still achieving sufficient environmental protection. There are many examples of watershed management having worked well. But there are also examples of failures. The committee will attempt to Team from these examples and describe how the nation can most effectively use this locally-driven approach into the next century. William Graf of Arizona State University chairs the committee. Members include Clifton Aichinger, Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District, Minnesota; Blake Anderson, Orange County Sanitation Districts; Gaboury Benoit, Yale University; Peter Bisson, USDA Forest Service; Margot Garcia, Virginia Commonwealth University; James Heaney, University of Colorado, Boulder; Carol Johnston, University of Minnesota; Leonard Lane, USDA Agricultural Research; Carolyn Hardy Olsen, Brown and Caldwell; Gary Petersen, Pennsylvania State University; Max Chair and Members of the Joint Boards of Directors Page 5 June 19, 1996 Pfeffer, Cornell University; Cliff Russell, Vanderbilt University; Leonard Shabman, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and Stale University; Jack Stanford, University of Montana; and Stanley Trimble, University of California, Los Angeles. CASA's Federal Legislation Reoort Attached is a June 4 memo from Tom Woodruff, President of CASA, reporting on pending legislative proposals discussed during the AMSA Annual Conference in Washington, DC. If you have any questions on the information contained therein, please contact Tom at 714/564-2605. Strateaic Plan Progress Report Attached is a progress report dated June 19 on activities associated with the Strategic Plan. Tom Dawes, project manager, has indicated that the work is ahead of schedule, and expeditures within budget. Strategic Plan Twelve members of the community, including representatives from the business sector, cities within our service area and environmental groups, attended our first Strategic Plan public participation meeting on Thursday, June 13, at McGarvin Middle School in Westminster. Staff and consultants explained the importance of the Stategic Plan, the projects comprising Phase I and our timetable. We were very disappointed with the attendance. The 5-7 p.m. time frame may have been part of the problem or perhaps our Strategic Plan is not a priority with your constituents. However, we are currently developing new ways to increase public participation in our strategic planning process. Bolas Chica Media coverage of the Bolas Chios State Beach closure is ongoing, and based upon the number of press inquiries, will continue. We have also been receiving requests for surfzone-monitoring data and the Los Angeles Times was on site Wednesday, June 19, to take photographs in our lab. We anticipate that a major article on the condition of Orange County beaches will appear in the Times within the next week. As we perform bacteria testing as far south as Crystal Cove, we will be mentioned in this article. Resister Article to Profile O.C. Hazardous Materials Strike Force The Orange County Register accompanied staff, the District Attorney's office, the O.C. Health Care Agency, and Anaheim Police on a search warrant inspection of an Anaheim circuit board manufacturer suspected of discharging extremely high Chair and Members of the Joint Boards of Directors Page 6 June 19, 1996 amounts of hazardous waste into the sewers. The ride-along, which occured Thursday, June 20, was background for an article on the Orange County Hazardous Materials Strike Force. The Register article should appear sometime within the next month. Donald F. McIntyre General Manager DFM:jt JIMDWCI FM DARD LTRL%1 W Attachments: PanEnergy Information FY 96/97 Training Calendar and Course Descriptions dated June 5, 1996 May 29, 1996 Letter from County of Orange CAO NEWS fax from California State Parks re Closure of a portion of Boise Chios State Beach June 3, 1996 Memo from CASA re Introduction of Bills by Constitution Revision Commission and May 1996 edition of CRC News May 28, 1996 Letter to CRWQCB re Administrative Civil Liability Complaint 96- 53 and CRWQCB's June 7 response Results of Directors Workshop Questionnaire June 13, 1996 Memo re Power Outages and related article from The Register dated May 19, 1996 Guiding Principles and Employee Assistance Program brochures June 4, 1996 Memo from Thomas Woodruff, President of CASA, re Federal Legislative Report June 19, 1996 Strategic Plan Progress Report Our Guiding Principles are a declaration of C�� pDO�]CW the beliefs wee affirm. Theeyy f form orm the framework of our organization and reinforce of ethics. our professional code Honesty, Trust and Respect The values Committee, a group of 15 We aspire to the highest degree of integrity, honesty, trust, and respect employees representing every area of in our interactions with each other, our suppliers, our customers, and our our organization,spearheaded the community. development of this document. They believe that while each of us is Teamwork and Problem Solving responsible for our Individual thoughts, g words and actions,we needed a written statement that truly reflected We strive to reach Districts' goals through cooperative efforts and the spirit of the County Sanitation collaboration with each other and our constituencies. We work to solve Districts of Orange County. problems in a creative, cost-effective and safe manner, and we A seven-member Guiding Principles acknowledge team and individual efforts. Subcommittee was formed. They began by developing a list of Leadership and Commitment attributes that best characterize our organizational culture. Then, Districts We lead by example, acknowledging the value of our resources employees were surveyed to learn and using them wisely and safely to achieve our objectives and goals. what,from that list of 18 traits,they felt We are committed to act in the best interests of our employees, were most important. Members of the committee tabulated the results and our organization, and our community. drafted a working document. Again, employees were asked for their input. Learning/Teaching - Talents, Skills and Abilities Staff in some divisions collaborated We continuously develop ourselves, enhancing our talents, skills, and before submitting their suggestions.Other employees worked abilities, knowing that only through personal growth and development independently. In the end, more will we continue to progress as an agency and as Individuals. than six months of individual input and group effort went into the Recognition/Rewards development of this document. We present to you our We seek to recognize, acknowledge and reward contributions to the Guiding Principles... Districts by our many talented employees. 10, Members of the Values Committee are: Blake Anderson We are the County Sanitation Dlstricts v Nick Arhontes of Orange County, a public service o® agency serving 2.2 million people In Greg Chesebro the metropolitan Orange County area Barbara Collins by safely collecting,treating Jim Colston and disposing wastewater. Matt Eddy HONESTY, TRUST and RESPECT Norbert Gala Chuck Lee < Clarice Marcin Mission Statement Portia Mina Jeff Reed 'To Protect the Public Health and TEAMWORK and Frank Schultz Environment Through Excellence PROBLEM SOLVING Molra Sullivan in Wastewater Systems" MorcoPolo Velasco < Simon Watson I Guiding Principles LEADERSHIP and COMMITMENT Subcommittee: Blake Anderson < Barbara Collins Jon Marie Esch LEARNING/TEACHING Jim Lowhon TALENTS, SKILLS and ABILITIES Chuck Lee Rose Marsella Paul Mitchell < Patrick MCNelly County Sanitation Districts of Orange County ECOGNITION/REWARDS P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 (714) 962-2411 We all have problems. It's a part of What are some typical problems? Where is Community Action located? life. But when those problems The Districts' EAP can help you with... Community Action offices are located begin to affect our performance on the job, it may be time to seek professional • alcohol and drug problems throughout Southern California. Only help.That's what the Sanitation Districts' • stress-related problems those employees who call for assistance Employee Assistance Program (EAP) is all • depression /anxiety are given the exact location of about...providing a helping hand to solve • marital or family problems Community Action offices.This is an problems BEFORE they overtake our lives. • children and adolescent problems added assurance of complete • separation and divorce confidentiality. Through the Districts' EAP,you and your •financial problems Who pays for counseling or other services7 family members can receive professional, • the death of a loved one The short-term counseling and referral CONFIDENTIAL counseling provided by services provided through our EAP are experienced social workers and psychologists. Who provides the counseiing7 free to you and your family. If long. Our EAP also provides 24-hour, seven-day- All crisis intervention, counseling term counseling or therapy is needed, a-week crisis intervention services...because and referral services are provided by your health insurance will more than you near know when an emergency may occur. Community Action, a nonprofit likely cover the cost. group staffed by professional, What is a problem? highly experienced psychotherapists How can I schedule an appointment or A problem is something that... and counselors. learn more about our EAP? •causes you worry,frustration,sadness, Who is eligible to participate? Districts employees can call Community anger or fear Action at 1-800-777-9376 between 9 All Sanitation Districts employees who 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. Monday through •takes a lot of emotional energy to pretend have successfully completed their six- Friday.Appointments are available days, that"it's not that bad"or"it will go away month probation period are eligible for evenings and Saturdays. 91 just ignore it"(even though you know this benefit. Benefits-eligible family it won't) members are also covered. What if 1 have an emergency? •affects you physically-dramatic changes How do you guarantee confidentiality? A 24-hour hotline is available for crisis in your weight or appetite,trouble sleeping counseling 365 days a year and is staffed •interferes with your ability to concentrate Your personal problems are just by professionals. Call 1-800-777-9376. tha•you recognize as a problem but you don't will stay. Neithal.er And theist the way they will stay. Neither the Districts nor your know how to handle it or where to go coworkers will have any knowledge of for help your request for assistance. No names or other identifying information will be given to the Districts without your authorization. And, all records are maintained off-site by Community Action in secured files. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County History of Employee Assistance Programs Employee Assistance Programs (EAPs) were developed in this country in the early 19405 to help employees with alcoholism.These programs were staffed by recovering alcoholics who were former or current employees.The goal of these early programs was to help employees troubled by alcohol abuse get help before poor performance resulted in termination. sow. Companies soon discovered that employees who had other concerns often sought the advice of a counselor. However, these "counselors" were not trained to deal with a wide variety of problems. companies hired clinically j trained professionals to provide counseling and referral services. Today, companies across the country offer EAPs.The Sanitation Districts provide this benefit to you and your family because we care about the well-being of our employees and their loved ones. If you could benefit from participating in our EAP, please call: o Community Action 1-800-777-9376 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, Ca 92 728-81 2 7 (714) 962-2411 94*a Avg Pwaw We all have problems. It's a part of What are some typical problems? Where Is Community Action located? life. But when those problems The Districts' EAP can help you with... Community Action offices are located begin to affect our performance Districts' .alcohol and drug problems throughout Southern California. Only help.That's what the Sanitation Dis on the job,it may be time to seek professional stress-related es s' P. l problems those employe who call for assistance Employee Assistance Program (EAP) is all •depression/anxiety are given the exact location of about...providing a helping hand to solve • marital or family problems Community Action offices.This is an problems BEFORE they overtake our lives. •children and adolescent problems added assurance of complete •separation and divorce confidentiality. Through the Districts' EAP,you and your • financial problems Who pays for counseling or other services? family members can receive professional, • the death of a loved one The short-term counseling and referral CONFIDENTIAL counseling provided by services provided through our EAP are experienced social workers and psychologists. Who provides the counseling? free to you and your family. If long- Our EAP also provides 24-hour, seven-day- All crisis intervention, counseling term counseling or therapy is needed, a-week crisis intervention services...because and referral services are provided by your health insurance will more than you near know when an emergency may occur. Community Action, a nonprofit likely cover the cost. group staffed by professional, What is a problem? highly experienced psychotherapists How can I schedule an appointment or A problem is something that... and counselors. learn more about our EAP? •causes you worry,frustration, employees can call Communityation,sadness, Who is eligible to participate? Action at 1-800-777-9376 between anger or fear All Sanitation Districts employees who 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. Monday through •takes a lot of emotional energy to pretend have successfully completed their six- Friday.Appointments are available days, that"it's not that bad"or"it will go away month probation period are eligible for evenings and Saturdays. if I just ignore it"(even though you know this benefit. Benefits-eligible family it won't) members are also covered. What if I have an emergency? •affects you physically-dramatic changes ? A 24-hour hotline is available for crisis How do you guarantee confidentiality. counseling365 days a year and is staffed in erf res with your ability troubletconcentrate to your personal problems are just b professionals. Call 1-800-777-9376. •interferes with your ability to concenVate that...personal.And that's the way they y p •you recognize as a problem but you don't will stay. Neither the Districts nor your know how to handle it or where to go coworkers will have any knowledge of for help your request for assistance. No names or other identifying information will be given to the Districts without your authorization.And, all records are maintained off-site by Community Action in secured files. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County History of Employee Assistance Programs Employee Assistance Programs(EAPs) were developed in this country in the early 1940s to help employees with alcoholism.These programs were staffed by recovering alcoholic who were former or current employees.The goal of these early programs was to help employees troubled by alcohol abuse get help before poor performance resulted in termination. i Companies soon discovered that 0 employees who had other concerns often sought the advice of a counselor. However, these "counselors"were not trained to deal with a wide variety of problems. companies hired clinically trained professionals to provide counseling and referral services. Today, companies across the country offer EAPs.The Sanitation Districts provide this benefit to you and your family because we care about the well-being of our employees and their loved ones. If you could benefit from ''y^ participating in our EAP, please call: ! -- h S Community Action 1-800-777-9376 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, Ca 92728.8127 (714)962-2411 a r a L i erg,y .. Who is PanEnergy Corp. ? • Providing natural gas transportation and related services for over 65 years • United States operations Assets of $7.5 Billion One of the largest transporters of natural gas supplies with more than 36,500 miles of pipeline 3rd largest natural gas marketer 4th largest natural gas gatherer One of the top 15 natural gas liquids processors @ 16 Million barrels of NGLs a year Marketing and trading @ 28 Million barrels of crude oil a year • International operations • Natural gas marketing services in Canada and the United Kingdom . Natural gas transportation to Mexico e PaAE ergy Who is PanEnergy Gas Services , Inc. ? • North American gas marketing organization with annual throughput exceeding 4.0 Bcf/d of natural gas (will be 7.5 Bcf/d with Mobil) • Ranks in the top three of all North American natural gas marketing organizations • Full service organization including risk management and Assured ServicesTM (peak management, storage services and fuels management) • Provides peaking, balancing, no-notice and structured pricing services d RiM ergy,. Storage Assets - Salt Lake Operating Center o Northwest Pipeline Jackson Prairie 250,000 ® Questar Pipeline Clay Basin 61000,000 ® California SoCal 51000,000 a Canada AECO 2,000,000 ® Total 13,250,000 RiM ergy Gas Volumes - Salt Lake Operating Center NlAIAme MMMd—D ■ Northwest Pipeline 500,000 ■ Questar Pipeline 150,000 ® WIC/Trailblazer 655000 ® Kern River 170,000 • Colorado Interstate Gas 1509000 ® El Paso Natural Gas 1509000 ® Pacific Gas Transmission 1009000 ® California Market Presence 225,000 .V a DONALD MCINTYRE 2150 n ......N June 5, 1996 MEMORANDUM TO: All Employees FROM: Linda Eisman� Training Manager SUBJECT: FY 96/97 Training Calendar I have attached a Calendar and Schedule of training events for FY 96/97 and a description of courses being offered so you may plan for all required and elective training. The required number of hours for each course has been listed by the course title. You may notice multiple sessions of some courses on the calendar. This is to accommodate the numbers of personnel requiring training. Employees are only required to take one session unless otherwise indicated. For example, the Pre-supervisory Training, the Cledcal/Secretarial Certificate Program and the Wellness Program are examples of those training programs where employees would take more than one session. Some of the mandatory safety training requirements, as well as some course content, are still being identified by the Safety Division. As these are identified, they will be included. Separate announcements for each class will be sent out prior to the class start date with training enrollment forms. To attend any of the classes, complete the form (with supervisor's approval and signature) and return it to the Training Division located in the Human Resources Department. The Training Calendar and Schedule will be updated and re-issued periodically to add courses, to modify existing courses, reschedule, change locations, etc. as required. For additional information, please call me at extension 2104 or Isiah Mitchell at extension 2113. LE:dm G:\WPU R\TRAINING\EISMAN\TRCALLTR. Attachments c: Don McIntyre Judy Wilson Blake Anderson COURSE D SCRIPIXONS ADVANCED EXCEL (8 hours) In this course, employees will explore lookup and data tables; array functions and conditional functions to give the spreadsheet added "intelligence." Employees will learn how to create advanced macros and about the Scenario Manager. They will also learn how to create custom toolbars, add menu options, and combine logical functions. (Open to employees designated by their supervisor). ADVANCED WORDPERFECT(8 hours) This course is structured for the"power-user,"stressing styles, graphics,advanced table features, and macros. (Open to employees designated by their supervisor). BEGINNING EXCEL (8 hours) This hands-on course is designed to teach the fundamentals of Excel. This beginning course covers topics such as: exploring the excel menus; selecting multiple cells; creating a spreadsheet; using the toolbars and editing the spreadsheet; creating and modifying charts; preview and print options, etc. (Open to employees designated by their supervisor). BEGINNING WORDPERFECT(8 hours) This course provides basic WordPerfect training for the beginner. It covers editing and formatting; working with Tabs; fmding and replacing text; creating and saving documents; managing files and multiple documents; creating headers and footers, etc. (Open to employees designated by their supervisor). BUDGET DEBRIEFING WORKSHOP (2 hours) In this workshop, the Finance Department will brief budget coordinators on the final FY 96/97 line items and changes. Budget coordinators will also be trained on improvements for next year's budget process and how to monitor the FY 96/97 departmental budgets. (Required for all designated budget coordinators). CALIOSHA ORIENTATION (4 hours) The main purpose of the workshop is to help supervisors and mangers become familiar with and understand CAL/OSHA regulations, how they apply to specific target audiences, and what the training requirements are by job classification. (Required for supervisors and managers) G]wPWRITRAININGGEISMANICRSDES [PAGE 11 June a, 1996 COURSE DESCRIPTIONS Y CLERICALISECRETARIAL CERTIFICATE PROGRAM(2 hour sessions) A series of two hour sessions for clerks,executive assistants and secretaries have been scheduled to deal with building a core base of competencies for those personnel. Various topics include: organizational skills; customer service;how tb handle multiple projects;building self-esteem; how to dress for success;telephone etiquette;grammar usage;effective writing;proofreading; and improving communication skills. (Open to all clerks, executive assistants and secretaries). CONFINED SPACES TRAINING MODULE (8 hours) Recent changes in State and Federal safety regulations now require that all potential confined spaces only be entered by those employees who have been trained and certified as"competent persons". These new, more stringent regulations were enacted due to the extremely dangerous conditions often found in utilities-related confined spaces. This class covers all aspects of working safely in and around confined spaces. Each participant will receive detailed instruction on how to properly assess,enter, work within and if necessary, rescue a co-worker from a confined space. The class utilizes lectures,participant's workbooks, audiovisual aids,demonstrations,and"hands-on"activities to explore and fully understand the nature of confined spaces safety. Those participants who successfully pass the written exercise and demonstrate sufficient skills during the"hands-on'evaluation will receive"competent person"certification. (Target audience being determined by Safety Division) CONFINED SPACES TRAINING MODULE REFRESHER(4 hours) This new course is specifically designed for,and limited to,meeting the annual re-training and re-certification requirements for confined spaces certified workers. In addition to reviewing the primary elements of confined spaces ndes/regulations/policies/procedures,participants will have the opportunity to solve`real world" confined space problems, and to demonstrate their skills in hands-on exercises. During the module, employees will receive all training required for recertification. Employees successfully passing the written exercise and practical skills test will receive re-certification good for one year. (Required for personnel who have completed initial confined space training) DEALING WITH DIFFICULT PEOPLE (4 hours) This course will focus on effective communication skills for dealing with people who present obstacles in getting your job done. It also focuses on nonverbal communication, conflict resolution,praise,and listening techniques which can prevent misunderstanding and encourage positive performance. (Open to all employees) DEFENSIVE DRMNG BASICS(4 hours) Every year District employees are involved in vehicle accidents ranging from minor fender-benders to life threatening collisions. Many of these accidents,including those found to be nonpreventable,could have been avoided by using defensive driving techniques. These techniques, as well as others,will be covered in a classroom lecture format. (Required for all drivers of commercial vehicles) G1wPWR\7RAININGmEISMANICRSDES [PAGE 21 June 4.1996 MERSE DESCRIPTIONS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SUBSTANCE ABUSE TRAUTMG FOR SUPERVISOR (4 hours) Course content being determined. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SUBSTANCE ABUSE TRAINING FOR COMMERCIAL DRMRC (4 hours) Course content being determined. EXECIMVE MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT TRAINING (Z day sessions) This is a series of three sessions designed to train the Executive Management Team and Division Managers in team building and strategic planning skills. An individual training session for department heads and one for division managers is followed by a combined session for both groups. (Required for Executive Management Team and Division Managers) FIRE SAFETY(3.5 hours) Increasing use of gasoline and electrically powered tools and equipment has made the possibility of fire a serious threat in the field as well as the office. This course covers fire prevention,flammable liquids handling, and fire extinguisher selection and use. This class gives"hands-on'training on fire extinguisher use. FIRST AH)/CPRBLOOD BORNE PATHOGENS TRAINING (8 hours) Course content being determined. FORKLIFT TRAINING (8 hours) Cal/OSHA requires all forklift operators to be certified. Class participants will receive their forklift operators' license,as required by Cal/OSHA,by successfully demonstrating proficiency during the"hands-on"phase of this class. FORKLIFT TRAINING REFRESHER(4 hours) Refresher training designed for forklift operators who have had the initial certification training. GRAPHIC USER'S GROUP TRAINING (1 hour) The ability to present your proposals and ideas to others is essential to a positive career experience. The Graphic User's Group will provide training on how to make presentations and how to increase presentation skills. It will focus on methods to organize and lay out your material, and how to prepare to make your presentation to one person,a committee, or a large group with confidence and authority. (Open to all employees). GAMMARRRAININGIEISMAN CRSDES (PAGE al June 4,1995 COURSE DESCRIPTIONS V HARYARD GRAPHICS (8 hours) This course offers comprehensive training in the creation of graphs,charts,and templates. Employees will learn how to create and customize pie, line,area and multiple charts. They will also learn to create images with drawing tools or use Evolve to transform the shape and color of objects. In addition,they will use the presentation-management tools and display features to create impressive slide presentations. (Open to employees designated by their supervisor). HEALTH ASPECTS OF WASTEWATER(I hour) This class provides a discussion of the diseases and effects of sewage exposure. The focus is on health risks associated with working with wastewater and safe procedures to follow to protect the worker from these health hazards. HEARING AND SIGHT CONSERVATION hours) Course content being determined. HERBICH)E AND PESTICIDE SAFETY a hours) Our use of chemical solutions to control the growth and spread of unwanted animals and plants has increased. The use of herbicides and pesticides can save time on the job. This course is designed for employees who regularly apply weed or pest control chemicals. A discussion of the properties, safe handling methods,and storage procedures of chemicals currently used at the Districts is included. (Target audience being determined by Safety Division) HOIST,CRANE AND DAVIT SAFETY(4 hours) Chains,ropes, wire ropes and cables,what's the difference? When is a rope ready to be replaced?How do you properly position the sling? Methods for the selection,maintenance and safe operation of various lifting equipment and accessories will be presented. (Target audience being determined by Safety Division) INJURY AND ILLNESS PREVENTION PROGRAM(4 hours) Under Senate Bill 198 and Cal/OSHA General Industry Safety Order 3203,every employer must establish, implement,and maintain an effective Injury and Illness Prevention Program (IIPP). This course provides the written requirements of the Program and defines"Responsible Person". Accident investigation techniques will be discussed, along with methods of evaluating workplace hazards. (Required for all employees) INTEGRATED EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROGRAM (8 hours) Course content being determined. 0:1WRHmTRAININGHISMANICRSDES (PAGE 41 June 4.1995 COURSE DESCRIPTIONS v 1NTERMEDIA .EXCEL(8 hours) This course presents many of Excel's more powerful features. Custom numeric formatting,multiple-cell selection,and naming ranges will be discussed. Employees will use the database features to sort, search,and extract information from collected data. (Open to employees designated by their supervisor). INTERMEDIATE WORDPERFECT (8 hours) This course emphasizes mail-merging,tables of contents, indexing, footnotes,advanced editing tools,columns and tables,etc. (Open to employees designated by their supervisor). LABORATORY SAFETY TECHMOUES(4 hours) The goal of this course is to get people involved in laboratory safety as an everyday routine. This will be accomplished by providing participants with the information needed to solve real on-the-job health and safety problems and issues. (Requiredfor laboratory personnel) LADDERS AND A)MOLDING (2 hours) Districts' employees perform a great variety of work both overhead and subsurface(e.g., stand pipe and reservoir maintenance,dam inspections, digester cleaning,and trenching operations). Safe techniques for handling these types of jobs will be taught. (Target audience being determined by Safety Division) LEADERSHIP EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT TRAINING(LEAD)(32 hours) This four-day course is specifically designed for first-line supervisors. It focuses on developing a core base of supervisory competencies and organizational interdependence. The course content includes: situational leadership; motivation techniques;communication skills; counseling/coaching skills;conflict management;group development; team building; problem solving and decision making;values and ethics; and dealing with organizational change. (Initial class requiredfor all first-line supervisors). LEADERSHIP EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT REFRESHER(4 hours) This class has been designed as a four-hour follow-up to the initial LEAD class. It will focus on how supervisors have been applying the tools provided in the initial LEAD class in the field, i.e. successes; what didn't work; identification of additional skills needed for training. (Requiredfor all first-line supervisors who have attended the initial LEAD class). GNORMTRAININGOSMAMCRSOES [PAGE Sl June 4,19M COURSE DESCRUMONS LOCKOUTlrAGOUT(3.5 hours) Federal OSHA Standard 29 CFR 1910.147 mandates that all employers establish policies and procedures which prevent injury to employees when machinery and/or equipment is dcenergized,isolated,or otherwise shut down for repair and/or maintenance. This class focuses on training employees working around machinery/equipment on the basic elements of the Lockout/Tagout Procedures and understanding ways to protect themselves around energized machinery/equipment (Target audience being determined by Safety Division) MANLIFP SAFETY(4 hours) Course content and target audience being determined by Safety Division. OFFICE SAFETY(2 hours) Although the office is not generally considered a hazardous job site,injuries do occur. Possible injuries can occur as a result of a slip,trip, fall,or fire. Electrical machinery (including faxes, computers and copiers), sharp objects,and heavy items all pose a threat if handled improperly. This class discusses ways to prevent office accidents and injuries. (Required for all office personnel) PERSONAL HYGIENE U hour) Course content being determined. POLICIES AND PROCEDURES TRAINING(3 hour sessions) This course is being presented by the Human Resources Department and has been designed to discuss consistent application and interpretation of policies and procedures.Training will be conducted each quarter covering different topics. (Required for all managers and supervisors) PRE-SUPERVISOR TRAIMNG (4 hour sessions) One four-hour training session on a different topic will be offered almost monthly as part of a Pre-supervisor Training Program. Some of the topics include: determining leadership styles;communication skills; motivation,coaching and counseling; problem solving and decision making; the empowered leader, etc. The focus of the course will be on building interpersonal skills. (Required for non-supervisor senior and lead personnel who are at one level below the supervisor and has major leadership responsibilities). G:\wPWR1TRAININGIEISMAN%CRSDES [PAGE 61 June 4.1995 COURSE E DESCRIPTIONS v PREVENTION OF SEXUAL HARASSMENT FOR NON-SUPERVISORY EWLOAEES(1.5 hours) Employees have the right to work in an environment free of sexual harassment. They also have a responsibility not to sexually harass other employees. Because most of the sexual harassment in today's workplace is not of an obvious nature, it is sometimes difficult to know what is okay and what is not. This course will help employees understand the difference. It will also cover how to stop unwelcome sexual behavior,what procedures to follow, and how the organization can assist in stopping unwelcome sexual behavior. (Required for all non-supervisory employees) PREVENTION OF SEXUAL HARASSMENT FOR SUPERVISORStMANAGERS (3 hours) Supervisors and managers have a responsibility to protect employees and the organization from the consequences of sexual harassment. They are often the first source of assistance for a sexually harassed employee. This course will better prepare the supervisor/manager for the task of preventing and resolving sexual harassment incidents in the work area Methods for determining the difference between behavior that is friendly and behavior that constitutes sexual harassment will be presented. In addition,the laws and policies that govem sexual harassment in the workplace will be explained. (Required for all supervisors and managers) PROJECT MANAGEMENT(S hours) This class has been designed to train personnel on developing project management skills. It covers how to plan projects;how to establish time lines;how to monitor and control projects;how to manage multiple projects; and resource utilization and costs. (Open to all personnel who have responsibility for project management administration and/or developing and tracking new projects). RESPIRATORY PROTECTION: SCBA AND AIRLINE(2 hours) This workshop provides employees with a basic knowledge of how to properly wear and maintain the SCBA. There is a two-minute drill to test the proficiency of donning and doffing(putting-on/taking-off)the SCBA at the conclusion of the training course. The Air Line breathing system will be introduced and there will be a discussion about how the system operates. (Required training for all personnel who use SCBA) SEMS WORKSHOP (2 hours) (Course content and target audiencer being determined) STRESS MANAGEMENT 0 hour) - This course is one of our Wellness Program modules. As our world becomes increasingly fast paced and pressured, many people experience stress to some degree either at work or at home. This class focuses on practical_application for stress reduction techniques to regain balance. It also teaches employees to recognize the ill-effects of stress on their personal and professional performance G:WMHRRRAININGIEISMAN%CRSnES [PAGE 71 Ju 4.1996 COURSE DESCRUMONS ' and how to incorporate balance,variety,and moderation in their life styles. (Open to all employees) TECHNICAL PROCEDURE WRITING(4 hours) This class has been designed to teach technical procedure writing techniques. It will provide guidelines on how to write standardized procedures and provide a template for developing procedures. (Open to personnel who have responsibility for writing and/or developing technical procedures). TIME MANAGEMENT(4 hours) This course helps employees discover value-based principles for managing their time and how to accomplish daily tasks that are consistent with their values and goals. It helps employees to become driven more by what is important and less by what appears urgent. It teaches them to avoid procrastination and become organized in their daily activities. (Open to all employees) TRAIN-THE-TRAINER(4 hours) This course is designed to assist Department employees who serve as course instructors. It focuses on classroom instructional techniques, course delivery,how to set course objectives and ensure they are met, lesson plan format, etc. Instructors will be videotaped and offered constructive feedback as a requirement of the course. (Required for departmental trainers) TRENCHING AND SHORING COMPETENT PERSON WORKSHOP (S hours) OSHA requires all trench protection to be installed and then inspected daily by a"Competent Person". In order to be competent in trenching and shoring,you must be able to classify soils and recognize existing and potential hazards. This class is intended for supervisors and crew leaders. It will provide training on soils analysis, how to recognize and avoid potentially dangerous situations,trench protection, and the laws concerning trenching and shoring. (Target audience being determined by Safety Division) USER TRAINING FOR SAFETY(monitorine instrumentation)(3.5 hours) (Course content an target audience being determined). VIOLENCE IN THE WORKPLACE(4 hours) This course has been designed to train supervisors and managers how to recognize and deal with potential violence in the workplace. It focuses on recognizing verbal and nonverbal symptoms; how to diffuse potentially violent situations; and how to reduce the risk of violence in the workplace,and identification of available resources. (Mandatory for department heads, managers and supervisors). _ G:IWRINRRRAININGIEISMAN%CRSOES (PAGE81 Ju 4.1996 COURSE DESCRUMONS WELLNESS PROGRAM ( 1 hour sessions) A series of seminars on various health topics covering physical and emotional health issues will be presented on a monthly basis. Examples of topics to be covered include: stress management;controlling blood pressure; a stop smoking and weight loss programs, etc. (Open to all employees) WINDOWS NT(4 hours) This class has been designed to introduce the differences between Windows 3.1 and Windows NT. It teaches basic skills needed to operate in the Windows NT environment. (Open to personnel who use or will be using Windows NT). GiwPui R\TRAININGOSMAN\CRSDES (PAGE 91 June 4, 1996 Y .. - 1996 June 1996 FY 96-97 DISTRICTS TRAINING SCHEDULE Su Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Sal 1 2 3 4u hl XGI SXDPIXG 5110101 aD MEN (i gXG'aM ;LDPMEX 7 8 MI B)12OO-t00PM mm-4opm M.-t00pm fmlrLLlpn MpnirRilm hl (RDW Bmrd Room CS00(Bmrd Room iRFNfNIXG RSIWRIMG qUO IId4m B)12M�tWpn fanumian MAm inihn/-I 9 10 I IFMmFi1ANNING 12111"INT'(S,&,) 13 14 15 ROCsm-tOOAM ASW II..W.m f PAEYENIIONolow Ml,,Lm RI BJ I:00-lOOpn NARASSMIM(S'AMAn) BwdRmm A)RW-IIAm BI I:OO /-00 p pm IJR WITY fM.AmA 1. UA m 1:1gM I:MLa INIUM,II WINE EVFMIOXMWNM MMIAOLffMERAVWfOWUX ROoWONOIN BOARD ROOX A OF Sauk 16 177AAIX,`N4("W'RadJdn,U) 18 NX`NG(kq Mdff mpr'ff) 19NApwCEW(ronEr'H") 20XRRREVEnA44MFII1(Omnrupmp) 21 22 NOOom-t)Opm 81001,414. A)E0l AIM it..Nlom ODO(8wrd Re CSW(B—d Nam g10.00-Il:lOom B)IO.00 II:IOom WINDEMKI DINING C)IU10-21IXpn (�190-kWpn A)ROD.m-1200mon WINIIONIN111LXING Opp-tl0pn D)SAO-O:SUpm B)12XR-00pm 1)WOhm-ILWrmi PNK7T i,6gAram Cmd.RmA Cai RmB B)IU0-t10 pn (W.RmB WIWNGPRINUR6ROLlOM INIUAI ILLNESS PREVENTION 9:OOIOWom PROGRAM FORAUFTIRAIWNGREFREUNR COW.AMA DOOM--11CON M.-M.W. BW,d Roam Nln Lm RmP-I WINAOWSXTTIAINING B)Cm UOpn CONTROL CENTER AUDRORIUMIWRK 0 23 24OE1EIMNEMp E Kin ONA 25DC(FOPXEq'tAAIMNGG 26DENELODERS 7PAINNAMA 27DMlOPMFRNfiMDXUNG OMR 28 29 (<uD.}r (LAJ.D.1- IIUD.} (CLAD.)Wpnwnli &ODom- �/ ROWm�IDOpm /. WOR 400pm / ROD,m-A:OOpm , .. B "C-f W..AmA r^T- - A 19PLA faNAmA WINDOWS XIMINING MNDOWSNTADIONG NO FAIVENION OT SEXUAL NO MEYENIIONOFBENWL u s:mm 1200non A)GI-1201). R KEM NARASIMENT , 0)WO-410pn B)12M tM pm AXnmoupnummplgen IarcnrynoXvnlpbpr NA91TR11XIXGROOM PWII7IBAINIWRDOM A)RAN. ID.m A)NAII 0)HIRE.II: . BI I000.Ila. C)AW-2EOpn (I1.90.2W pm D)BOO•UOpm D)km.Uopn TRAIN I Wirt A. COMROI(EWER AUD90AIVK WOIENCEIX THE WORLIIACF INIUAI ILLXESSPRFYEMIOXPAOGPAM 3U full OOun B:CO111.11CON1 BWDRDM Bwrd Rome PERNI4AF0VIAFD CONFINED SPACE GRAPHIC USERS GAWP TRAINING TAAININGAFRNE 2W-S:W pm IMIRPN (ONF.AMC BMAOAWM AFSMAAIMYPROIECIIOX SCUAANDAIADNE-ST . 8,00 HI MwlmNRm P-I MNWWSMTMIXING A)LOORm-I2Wmm B)IND UOpn PUNT21RMNIXGRMM # =MANDATORY TRAINING..............SAFETY TRAINING IS UNDERLINED June 3, 1996 v 1996 July 1996 FY 96-97 DISTRICTS TRAINING SCHEDULE saw Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Sat WIXmWSMTIMIwNG PERNM-RENTREOMPANEDsp" A INDEPENDENCEDAY 5 6 AI&ohm l2mrmn TANG `T B)12A.UOpm BODum R00pN COME RMA BOARDROOM OUNCEIVIEWDR7 8'1 fl h Xl2DOpm"""m 9BA0 F1010 M SENS F 0.11NING ML0HAP10 B)0`1I13hm"IX`""" 11&30 113%.Mae A'"�"""" 12 13 B)Im.Smpm BOARDBOBN fsm(Bwrd Amm 6m[BwrdRmo BmADA00M AN M.WEAWSOATANXIN& Nn0fTAAINPoATATANIUBffW USERTWNIXGfOASWMjwim,im WIMDOWSNITRAINIXG A,wtinpwvlsduNvp SYilb Epbv 11 'mwmemn AIRAhm-N. III 120opn B 40)pm A)&WII3hm BIND-UO, ( Rmx CENOWL(ENRAAMONUM 6)1:00U0pm [ONI RN WAKE WELLNESS PROGRAR, bannd N,PAMWIONOF EE"UAL Limy PARMSM011 . .". YPRMMNOIMI 9,00,I0,00am AIM M. RMUM MFAT mNf.RMC B)IR00 II:lOwn brmmpriuwmUlopm D)M."pm a)IBM I130Xm nA"f)TUNINGR00M Qlm-2lOpn D)3m UOpm RERMAATOATMmT0101(smR [DXIRUNTERAUDNDAIUM Al Ln_1XE) P-20nU u /�}OnlUlgsAOpN 14 15mm"INDD, 16 O-11:110. I71IM-IM XFR ING 1"�`" "�"" 19 20 Cw we W..RmA (md.RmA [a.RmA Uw0.TRMNINGfORWITT Imrnileime imvumm,unl RMIPS3AIOAINIX mRXE A)&OMII-113oAM PAINm AK*RUwXG B)I:ODWM kwx BAw.n lmM BOARDAOOM mxI.RM[ ".1 DFBRIFFIXG WOARSNOP &OXI.AM B XI. B 21 22"BD`D"m°"`3,00, '"` 23h,e"gw LL N�1N' 24 mpLmnaAvmaDuuS 25 &30 I10%& AORWAEs 26 21 Bond R. (pbu 1) (mDCB mAavn OOm Bw,d Rmm BO&IM-ILmPM God.PhA 03RIOINWAMON mA n1NAGERSA"D RESPIRATOAT PROTE[MOM(S(BRANO SUPERSOM MINE) WELDIESSPROGRK'Noa.W &OWM-I20091 1230-23mM Lilmgle (ANFPAIRNTERAUDROMUN mXF.AMA Phw A4m iv]TRAINING ROOM GAAPNI[USERS GmIIP TRNXING IEMSEXECIIIINETAAIWXG 2mIMI .mc BOOM NITIA 28 29BBh�"'toopm 30BODlm-`"l(kpm "'"G 31AN&W-113WM uWANB W.R A 8)I.04OPII B0.1m ROOM BEGINNING ME &Ohm-k14. mFlOFAIAXSNATAMOMSIIASfAX[F COS.AN ABUSETRAIVING(.1N, &m 1100, PERMIT REOWAmmXFINEDSPACE COXMIEWERWITORWM TUNING &Ohm too, SWEIROM #= MANDATORY TRAINING..............SAFETY TRAINING IS UNDERLINED June 3, 1996 1996 August 1996 FY 96.97 D(s7IRicTs TRAINING SCHEDULE Su Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Sat 2 3 &-0OIM.I200iM HIMP wARORoon 4 5&DO�mGI b D AEWRITIRO 6 9RO 0-00�m K" Cmml 7�m8-WRR�1 RTOWK hipsm O &0flll ppem A A MOGAAM 9 10 BOARDROOM BOARDROOM (PW-2) ua.w 7 BOOARDDRORO R k00pm OM W00-1tow. PROGW&Wright(omier 0DO-Im AMIXG BOARDROOM fDOD-RMA ONf.AMA WHAPKALPOCIDUREWUNG m 1mAEB4ERIMIN NG I( I71I 12& am-RODpm 13AIta � F14flm-Bopm 15 & 1J WARDROOM 8)1:00-S.-0Dpm nANIlTROnNGROOM W.Rmh BOARDROOM DEFENSIVE ORWIN4 B[GI00XGWOADnUEO BEGIMMINGWOROPERFECT &OD-110) (PRBEIRYAIDIBLOOD BORNE &00tm.OR, &Dkm-kODpm CONF.RMC PATXDGENSTWIMING (ONF.RMB CORI.AM &OOM-k00PM WAR.AMC 1015nunly LOCIOUTIM00Uf &DORM-ROOWI A)AANM-11" MASROLCENIERAWRORIUM B)19 uw BOARDROOM 18 19Am-IIW�INONIOAASNOP 20A,...wIwEw pm 21TAI�Gs,�R'�.' I �N, 22"L"�°"�"" w"° 23 24 fm0.RmC B)I:OD SAOgn SWNC(Bmel, 9:W-IOOmm BOARDROOM &NBI-ROOPN PbmlTWNIAGRROM ' 10ERMENTEEACEL W.RmA &OAm k+Apm LABOWTORNSAIMTEMPROMS COAL AM &OO IO.ONEI LOm -ftAWUf CORI,AM( Apam-lmm DEFENSIVE DRIVING B)jmO &OO-Il:OU pm WuLXEBSMOGPAX:wgt( d BOIAORDOM BDAAD ROOM 9:W-IOWw PAm2wlmlXGRO0M 25 26&EG�ImO AIFR 278,01n.�NIN4 2OAN M UINE On OXRYB 29A HOM 10AM 30 31 (OMI.RMB (W.RmA OPERARATIDR11AMSNln) B)IM-AmM &O0-mmII BOARDROOM NAES"m BOAADRODM A)800AM-II:AM GRAMGCUSERSOMPTRU0N4 B)IW.km 100-kWpm CONLAMC CDM&RMC PERKR.REOUIRED COVINEDSPACE TRAWINGLdmMI uhm-IHOpm BOARDROOM *=MANDATORY TRAINING..............SAFETY TRAINING IS UNDERLINED June 3, 1996 > 1996 September 1996 FY 96-97 DISTRICPS TRAINING SCHEDULE Su Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Sat 1 21ARDR DAY 3ADVANUDEII(FL 4WELLMFSPAO(RAR [sLELD.AEIAEREAIRAININ4 6 1 @Ohm-k00Pm B,W rjINXlwv J @».u:mm [ONf.AXB 9%.10.Ohm Bmk Amm W.AmA ILAN DFMFAGEAYIAFSPoXSf Ou"-s B[GINWXGWOADP[RIE(I &OWDROCAMPM &Mhmianfl ROAADAOOM fOX1A0(UNIERAUOITOAIUX WFLLN[Sf IROGAAM:Oddng(mo4ng 4A0.10A0mn ' (ONLAXA 8 9A)&OO-SIXfN4.INIXIN4 10 A)&0°W-1-1Ik00pmXIXG 1119AIPAESUPE�.W11H 12&A IIAIIAhW PAWRAN 13 14 B)Ik10-HOpm B)IDD-kIOpm (Pl ,1) W.MA (UXI.AM CONF.RMC &M,1 04. Bmd R. WIXWWM NIIRAIXIXG (PRAIRSIADAMODKINE A)@OO IkWpm PA790GEM TRAINING WIH)MnTAA1nNG B)RRO UOpm &OWM.kcn A)@00-ROOpm COXF.AMB ONE.RMA BI R70-kBOpm ODWROLUXIERAUDROAIUM INIEGRRED FNERGENU RESMIg PROGRAM @OWRI@WPM --_ -- BauDAoOx 15 I6A°&U0Y0 200pmIXG 11A9ftMP %IA: d q S-linPROGRA 19&�LELD.REFRESXFAAMXIXG UNM 20 21 BI 1270-4:10Pm 9:00-W* 900-I&Ohm Md.RmA CONI.AMB MAID0IRIIXINGROON PLANUIRAINIX600M INIEGRATEDEMERGENVAUMNSE IWEGUIEOEMERGEW RESPONSE PROGRAM MINUM &00AM-SAOPM &°OEM Wpm BOARDROOM BOARDROOM v 'I � F0 ";° � "" 0 m22 23 24 aMIMG6 .1v 251 26 :m.IW; 21 28 &Ohm4100pm (PI.-1) (od RmA COULLSIC &Ohm-12Wpm ' bud Mom & MMCUSERSGROUPTURUNG M.IAOPm IRf EWER WNF.RMC &ODAM.IIJWI kwh (OUTAOL(ENIERANERINUM 29 30 * =MANDATORY TRAINING..............SAFETY TRAINING IS UNDERLINED June 3, 1996 1996 October 1996 FY 96-97 DISTRICTS TRAINING SCHEDULE Su Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday sat 11PAA;ON01GODS D�PIRG ! 2 WIPApAMIDfdEXE 4 5 &00AM 4*PM DONF.mc EOXF.RMA WELLNESS PROGRAM 'AAB'mgm DNmrc BAO 10W BOARDROOM HAINAAD6 1&OMm-QUP�mXM 8U&A� -twp �W IIUG70, P �Skn I OTW41MGES&PAO[FDUPES I I 12 DONE.RMB oEO111.AMA tp a, ) &10 11:Mam BAOIm-12(Opm Baud Amm USERERAIMNIORSAFEM M 1021PAININGACON Imaeimineuwnvmnnenl INIEGUIEDFMERGFNAAESFOUE &00 WAS. IXIE4UIEDEMEUFNn PFBPoXEF I'mum DOXF.RMc PAO4UX &00m ROOM &AGMS-0Om DOXFADOMSA&B LONOWLDENIEAAUMfOAIDN UE �DDR VERN( 11NNLLIfSAPADLEDUKS 113 14PMism 15E IRA LM 8 19 DOXFROONB DOKAAME Bmrd Paem &I0-1190om BakA m InIBi[UXEAMXO UFEII INRGUttOEMFRGFNM AFSPopf &OOAMRIOPoPM PROGUM BOARD DOOM &OGI4S.A01M (0)GWIQXIFAAUMIONUM WILINESS P0.O4PA1� M. mgmv(Nl IAMmT1&0M. MNI IL0.OXINGAOOM INT20 21 22AnEPoXEEDPROG6m 23RlNlKGCE4ammui .SkA 24XR000E"Amm M 25 26 &OGM-S:00PM Eyr 0t &OGM1S:Wm BOARDROOM &OM.-UUODpm BDUDROOM BOUDRWM GED 1,USFUWW110.11XIXG &M-9.PERSDUML111 CORLAMOpm &00-B:IA DONI.mc EOXF.RMA 27 28 291 tun 30 31;�" mM'" I BII:ODS:Wm AI&00 ilmm [Op.mA CORP.AM B) P.RN A0MM A # =MANDATORY TRAINING..............SAFETY TRAINING IS UNDERLINED June 3, 1996 1996 November 1996 y FY 96.97 DISTRICTS TRAINING SCHEDULE - Su Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Sat I 2 sm 3 Rt� 0pn 5"DWIOIDO[w DF MIEn 6`OpMGmlwWcN*Vhe6 7wIDttMENf�"miMi I 8 9 p lA.S:Mpm IMMA09M W. DW Wk. DOAMAWM AODym.MOOpm pm A. MMAESSfADaMIAOoDD DmrAAasn Offla SHM Q w XIUMAPaMODESAnII A06IDOWAI M.lO OIIAAMffl1 M.lO (ONf.AXE (W.AmA DA0-16W [OXIIOIaXIFAAOMOAIDX MEDIA 10 II VETERANS DAY 12AWATIVEMMAI D ""` 13 .I `M""IDG"" 14nDxk".A wlbompp)o 15 16 EW.WA (OII.AAA MAXI] IGIOM (PIUTIMTeOANWOAOME DI MTEDEMAGIVORWIR MWIR)AW I PATNOGeGTWMM to-IOODM MR-km eWM-SAVA DMMIAOA (OXI.M( DOMOAMM 11 18 19f`mN,,mx0 X'mwp 20,wM�ww"s0RIu. 21�G.MDMMIA"A""'M 22 23 (OM.MA VO.Amin NOW I�GMIEDEXGGEA(I AF510ME DMADIlm DMDMWMDNIIMTPIMI mum WIMP MN.S:MPII MDDEAASMMLONG (ONf.MA eOMOAMM &M.MUM (DN(ROE(ENnIADDITOWX GAAPM(URMGAOIIPTMMM WNLRWFA)GMIADn(ugyhh 200.AOOpm Q.w (ONI.M( M Ikepm IMN MINOAOM 24 25 26 :ftwr M 21 281NANRSGIVING 291RAPAURGIVRING-OBSERVED 30 EOM.MA DISTRICT HOLIDAY" RKSAF AhOMM.II:IMI Aw.K"c #=MANDATORY TRAINING..............SAFETY TRAINING IS UNDERLINED June 3. 1996 1996 December 1996 FY 96-97 DISTRICTS TRAINING SCHEDULE- Su Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Sal 1 2 3 �;^DIWA RWARA 4@ "DD M"�A"""W 5 f.001""'�D DI W, AW,RA 6(wm DRI01N[N IAV"IXD 7 MOWN MOWN WN MOWN kOO�m-kOOpn MOM W Mfi,PPL l 9A.Hkoh m Aline v�e.w 9AO IWN PAUDAWN 8 9ADM-IUD, 1" 0pm :;dam WNk 12,;"kDml" Hu 13 14 AIIHO-knpm BI123O klOpm NO4m RfApn Ap nA kMNn C(Of.ANA WM.ANA MD ROOM ADNAANA WDIWWSNISIWNIND SENS MIA 4w.lU4. *w-LSMN 1pm-kIOpm MOWN MMULQMMAMMMNI SENSWOMD O A.M-SWN Pu"nAwWxc"aon 15 16 I7�'d? "" 18 19M YAM 20 21 tftm-Imp@DD.ID.DDIM MOWNWM.RN, SNNWOMAMP DMPWAINMSOWIDSAWMN6 kM N-Wmonl M Mpm win.Mrs AA (ONF.WN( NfAl11 toWN SWNSWMFRNAl10N O ONM.WAND WALRNIMPAWMk to-I&O.n Bbophame kM NANIl11WNI)TUNI MD IADN 22 23 24 CHRIST EVE 25 CHRISTMAS 26 27 28 29 30 31 *=MANDATORY TRAINING..............SAFETY TRAINING IS UNDERLINED June 3, 1996 1997 January 1997 FY96.97 DISTRICTS TRAINING SCHEDULE Su Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Sal INEWYEAASIAIY 2 3 4 5 Ch.-""�' 7W`�ry 0W w#r 8'M.PH-SU ink. "RM "XI"` 9 10 11 (ONLAMC 9.m-la .(Pwl) EONIWLGNERAMRIUM WMLEENEAAUNTONUM 12 13 ICZa.�FNIAANIXG 15 16R 1I "" 17 18 CONAOLRNEAAUORONUM LONRGGNIEAAWWOMIN I7 20 21 U0.Wvam GIMOGNIM 2'A &.NOYAUN�NA1MIg11@ 23 [.,NpmA74A0U11RAIXIX4 24 25 (ONROLGNERAUMONUM EONAOLGNEAA000ONUM (ONAOLEENEAAUNEONUR W6LNQL mm. 903.1 gpvq.Iewd' RAW I AN 1TUmANNX4 ROOX 26 27 28 29 30 31 *=MANDATORY TRAINING..............SAFETY TRAINING IS UNDERLINED June 3, 1996 1997 February 1997 FY 96697 DISTRICTS TRAINING SCHEDULE Su Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Sat I 2 3 4MwXF�nM1ADGnMLm� 5' SY"nSOd�ID"hM 61WNIK SBPRG[FDUAFS 7 e 94hm-IO DDn 1) &a..ROD°m D.IWm-II:IWm U EOMIMRaATERMMMUM EOAYROLODWEAAUMORIUM BOARDROOM 9 10 11 12�w """°`°"` 131RAXIA aA/RO FOUAES 14 15 LVED BY DISTRICTS MXIMLaullAuaIODuM RM.IIJGm OBSERVED BY DISIRIDS BOARDROOM YRLLXEDMA RVEk. im-sun netnumm DRAMMUaA1UW1YADXING I6 IIMRESIDEMIS DAY 18&." 19 mangBta edryDlU 20100-mP 21 22 OBSERVED BY DISTRICTS w-10,00ni ROhin RDGpin <OXIROLaBIERAUMODUM KWIBAAIMIXGROOM M14101 1ERAUDOWUM 23 24 25"A�M",w.,"p.R`"°ALLY° 26 21 28 (OpROLOOREAMMOAWM * =MANDATORY TRAINING..............SAFETY TRAINING IS UNDERLINED June 3,1996 1997. March 1997 FY 96.97 DISTRICm TRAINING SCHEDULE Su Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Sot I 2 3 CLhliFNPROGRA&AWonpIXXR 50*t OOmmmRTNEXIXG: {1 6 7 8 9:00.1&OO�m I'm 1) & HOP'. 0m HOP'. CONTROL CENTER AUDITORIUM (UNROL(IMRRAUNfONUM 9 I KW 1"TIOOpe IXG I I� 11L 13' ' � 14 15 8)RR-t14pm LOGnzhM Mee Loalw M RERe "-ffj- m (ONIROIRNRRAUNTORNM imna59w. WNWWSMTTRNNNG WINOOWSXTTRINING A)&RO-uOOpm AIM-MORE. WINNNNSRTUNING NI PIT.kNm R)IHO-tRpn A)&OO-ROOp (OMIAOIRNRAAUNTONUM (ONTROINNRRAUNIONUM R)I&10-43Opm CONTROL(ENTEAAUDITONUM 16 17 181.bRh. ilTRGA1RRNmW 19' "04.61y XIXG 20 21 22 9:OO-I0,0m &OD. ROTT- 9RROTRAINIXGROON (ONROLQNIERAUNTURIUM 2324 25M. 00P. 26 27RM t�SGROU9TMAINING 28 29 (0)(ROLNNRAAUORU M (ONTROL(ENNRAUNTORIUM 30 31 #=MANDATORY TRAINING..............SAFETY TRAINING IS UNDERLINED June 3, 1996 1997 April 1997 FY96.97 DISTRICPS TRAINING SCHEDULE Su Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Sat I"Hww mf'" irH.Aj 2 3 4 5 sno.iks (;,N a 0 mxnoLUXrtAAuaroeux 6 7 8 9h.M.,*4A"D%W.Xwbn 10 II 12 mm.LHOPM oOIAAOLUNIAAAUNTON" 13 14 15 N`a .�;: 16 17 18 19 PLAN-IONWm PUMP 11RAIXIXO PAON 2021 22 23P*��;6�."'P;Li, 24�> ,m"'N"°"'""XI"` 25 26 B.Nmm-RWpm NONIROLUMIIAAUNnOAIUX O)NIAOLUMU0.AUNOOAIUX 2728 29 30 sk=MANDATORY TRAINING..............SAFETY TRAINING IS UNDERLINED June 3, 1996 1997 May 1997 FY 96-97 DISTRICTS TRAINING SCHEDULE Su Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Sat 1 2 3 4 5'WMMMENITTRAAIXX6u` 6KLM MIMIMIIXM` 7`RAM`FIDOTAA1MNG 8UAt WURAORMENIIIRAI TING 9 10 A)IO.Ohm ll. A)I:IO.O.IOIm A)1:1A.4-Il 8)21A -I1 O)I&OAlmo200pm BII&003;wp. Opm B)I'm-140I200pm 8)I& .3.0p.Apn QIAANI:OOpm ODKROI:UNTE gLOO-1A0pn CI1:001A0pn (OMIMLQXIEA AUdIOPIUM (ONIRAI(FNIFAAUDITORIUM (ONIAOIRXIFRAUOIIONUN (ONIROIQNIFRA110110R1UX WEUNfttfV?WAWAA *NUOU4 PA!!"DURft f/arWgbR�lNemeN' ]DRAINING [UGPUN.IBU LM)90N:NO 11 12RNWRN`ENIOIRUIXIXfi"` 13*mvE`MIIWMIM` 14*,PA IENIIPAINSExw 15fIP0[FUUR6)RAIN/NG 16 17 (m��vamewd Imllw�oXl (-UPMM.) "0- A)LIO-MA.m A)ENI.Mhm A)IJO BJWm Lmnoffmv O)IOOAA. t"Tm 0)IOOhm-lHOPM 8)IO.AOmi-12AApm QIAO IAOpm C)1:00-WARM 01:00-10, (ONIROLQNIFRAUDIIOAIUM (OXIROL(FNIERAUDIIOAIUM (ONIROL((NIERAUDIIOANM I Nw�om")MIN E,� IN '� *A4 MITU18 19ARVMIG 20=MNTNG 21 LM"TIMINIRG 22MUENTINING 23 24 nwm-) (lw�) Owrh-1 &M I&Wm ROD IAm &O0-IeDI &00-IO.O , (OMIAOLRNIFRAUORORIUM CUNIROLCFRI[RAUGIORIUM COIMROLCFNIERAUDIIORIUM (OXIROL(EXIEAAUNTORIUX WELLNESSMRU4RAI, -PhmiplwAMi - 9A0 IOOhm P1.11I IIRAININ4ROOM 25 26 MEMORIAL DAY 27 28 29 30200 I`W m 4WAPINIMIN4 31 (OMIAOL(EXIER WDVOAIUIE *= MANDATORY TRAINING..............SAFETY TRAINING IS UNDERLINED June 3, 1996 1997 June 1997 E FY 96 97 DlS;CYS,7'HAII CHEDUiig. Su Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 wELIXEss eA W RAEU ae,mg I> Ru,n, 9:W IP.Wvnlovrt I) WNTAOL(ENTEAAUq(OAIUM 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 OR [01AXITRUNING WINWwSNURMNING 10100116WHAIXIN "TD(WeNTUAING A):-RWpm A)RW-IMOpm A)RW-RWpm A)BAO-1100pm 0)2E0-4"pm B)IHO-t)opm B)IM-M:AOpm pla.o*. WNTAOL(ENRRAUg10R1UM CONTROLCENTER WODORIUM WNTROLCENIFRAUDMUMUM (0)IEROLEENIERAUOIIOAIUM 15 I6 17WF�XES PRO RAM Om,inglmr 18 19%EbRm"UM.dWWv11PAXING 20 21 9:W-IROWm BOO'IOADum PLANT ATRUNIG ROOM WX(RO((ENIERAUDRORIUM 22 23 24 25 261*bpFER,e 1.d. G 21 ,GADDAEwNIXG 28 RW-loO CONTROL(EWER AUD)TONUM WXIROLCENIEAALDRORIUM - 29 30 * =MANDATORY TRAINING..............SAFETY TRAINING IS UNDERLINED June 3, 1996 �R✓ ' �,�•{ °f O� JANICEcMN.NUTITT�RMIEIER J F OWNTOFADMI CSrahn N Q ('j RORERT E.iOCJVIC ENTER DMINt4lRATION U tr1 IDCIVIC CSAWA AA].CA R 1OOR SANTA ANA.CA 9rR11a062 1P TFIE HONE,(7I<)aYb'm 9C10R� May 29, 1996 FAX:014111WVIa COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICE Mr. Donald McIntyre General Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Vall , CA 92728-8127 Deaz After a review of the facts and analysis of the attachment to your letter, I cannot agree with your belief that the County failed to negotiate in good faith with the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC). Based on this review, I most decline your request for a refund of the $100,000. 1 feel that the County and County staff has extended significant time and resources to provide all the information required and otherwise comply with all the terms and conditions set forth in the letter of November 16, 1995, from CSDOC to me that sets forth the essential terms of CSDOC's exclusive right to negotiate. Attached you will find a summary to address those areas that you have identified as areas in which you felt the County failed to provide complete information. The attachment is self-explanatory and I don't feel it is productive to engage in further ad hoc exercises to determine "who did what when". I will, however, attempt to address your two main areas of concern. You objected to the County's approach of considering CSDOC's offer in light of other options available to the County, including the option to keep the system and the option to sell the system to a private sector buyer. 1 feel that the core right granted CSDOC was the assurance that the County would not negotiate with any other potential purchaser during the time period that CSDOC was preparing an offer to be considered by the Board. No County staff engaged in any negotiations or communications with any representative of any prospective purchaser of the landfill system concerning any potential sale of the system. No where in the November 16, 1995, letter was there any mention of an agreement to consider CSDOC's offer in a vacuum, nor is this normally implied in a grant of exclusive right to negotiate, nor would it be possible. The November 16 letter provides for a detailed list of certain proposed terms that must be dealt with in the CSDOC offer and than provides "If you and your staff determine the term sheet is complete, it will be presented to the Board of Supervisors for approval and authorisation to negotiate the final formal agreement. We recognize that the Board of Supervisors may desire to reserve the right to make counter offers If the Board of Supervisors does not approve the term sheet neither party shall be bound to any further agreement." (Emphasis Added) This language explicitly recognizes the possibility that the County would consider the CSDOC offer in light of, at the very minimum, the possibility of retaining ownership of the system. At all times it was also made clear that the County would evaluate the CSDOC offer in light of potential sale to a private buyer. There is nothing in that letter that would indicate that the County had committed itself unconditionally to a sale of the system to CSDOC. 4 �Yd Mr. Donald McIntyre May 29, 1996 Page 2 At the time the CSDOC offer was presented to the Board it was thomugbly evaluated by staff and even though several of the Board members were disappointed by the terms of the offer and critical of the offer, it was fully considered by the Board and County staff was directed to clarify several points and get additional information before the Board acted on the offer. The Board never acted on the offer. The offer was withdrawn by CSDOC before the Board could take action. You also assert that the failure of the County to provide CSDOC with a copy of the report prepared by Ernst & Young concerning the value of the landfill system was somehow a breach of CSDOC's exclusive right to negotiate. No where in the November 16, 1995, letter does it provide that this report would be provided to CSDOC. Admittedly there was discussion between County staff and CSDO staff about providing this report to CSDOC. The County staff consistently expressed concern about this report becoming public information since the possibility existed that CSDOC and the County would not come to an agreement. If this report were public it could seriously prejudice the County in future negotiations with a private sector buyer. In response to this concem the County Counsel and CSDOC's counsel prepared a draft of a confidentiality agreement but this agreement was never executed by either Board. Also, it is unclear what relevance the Ernst & Young valuation would have had to CSDOC. CSDOC's offer appeared to be based on maintaining the income stream from the importation contract that the County plans to use for bankruptcy recovery purposes and did not consider any value am'butable to other income of the landfill system or on any other assets of the system. In closing, I remind you that the Board will consider hiring a consultant on June 25, 1996, to assist with the potential sale of the landfill system. Should the Board authorize staff to pursue a sale, CSDOC is certainly welcome to submit a purchase offer. cen"y, a ce Mittermeier Chief Executive Officer Attachment cc: Members, Board of Supervisors John C. Cox, Jr., Chair, CSDOC Board of Directors Vicki Wilson, IWMD IAIwUM2,GH.m -y REBUTTAL TO THE CSDOC APRIL 16, 1996 STATUS OF INFORMATION IN THE CSDOC NOVEMBER 16, 1995 LETTER OF INTENT ISSUE STATUS 75 day exclusive negotiation period. Complete. CSDOC had exclusive right to negotiate December 5, 1995 to February 18, 1996. There was no implied right that the offer would be considered in a vawum. Provide all other agreements and Complete. County never withdrew its offer to copy all permits. available documents. Inform 15 days prior to any contract Complete. All Agenda Item Transmittals were sent to action having a value of$250,000 or CSDOC, including all contracts. greater. Provide all financial records for Complete. In the opinion of both the County and current year, three years prior, and CSDOC's consultant, Price Waterhouse, this was done. all records regarding indebtedness. Provide all litigation files. Pending execution of the confidentiality agreement. Inform 15 days in advance of Complete. No settlements occurred during the 75 day litigation settlement of more than period of negotiations. $250,000. Provide within 15 days all easements All existing agreements were sent to CSDOC. "Access and right-of-entries for closed sites. to (closed) sites was not granted to CSDOC." As our January 10, 1996, letter explained, the County cannot give what it does not have. The existing rights-of-entry with landowners did not allow CSDOC to drill in property not owned by the County. County used best efforts to obtain waivers and additional approvals from landowners. Determine completeness of term Complete. County staff report to Board on March 12 sheet. detailed areas of the CSDOC MOU which were not acceptable. Board directed staff to enter into 30 day negotiation on the terms with CSDOC; CSDOC chose to withdraw its offer. Deposit refundable down payment 20 Complete. There was no down payment. There was days after acceptance of the term no refundable down payment made. sheet. .WwD3 w,29,H% 6-07-199G 12:2APM FROM ORANGE COAST NIO SEC 714 adl7a30 P_ I f,m CLL ahM Pate M w.so NAV11Yr21 1l1 4�% Hews PARKS AN STATE PARKSION DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION 1416 Ninth Street,Sacramento, CA 95814 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: DON ITO, C714)843-0961 RUNE 7, 1996—99 024 or KEN COLOMBINI,(916)654-7538 PART OF BOLSA CHICA STATE BEACH CLOSED DUE TO SEWER SYSTEM PROBLEMS HUN'1TNGTON BEACH —Commang elevated levels of cohform bacteria have led the California Department of Parks and Recreation to dose pert of Bolsa(]ilea State Beach today. The closure came a[the order of the Orange Canty Health Core Agency, which made the decision even though the bacteria counts were well below the sate limits for swimming. The Department of Parks and Recreation and the County Saniation Districts of Orange County had been working proactively to ensure, the safety of beachgoera since elevated counts were first discovered in late May. At that time, they immediately began to treat the sewer lice and to lay the groundwork for repairing or replacing it. The Health Cara Agency has requested that the beach remain closed until the restrooms arc closed and chemical toilets msmlled, but the Dcpartonan of Parks and Recreation and the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County are working together on alternatives that serve the public beter while still nu iutsimng health safety. The portion of the beach that is closed rums from Lileg.arc Tower 23 south to Scapoint Blvd. —30— For more Inforinsfim mMa an:invited to all Larry Hmrybourra of the Orange County, Health Gre Agency,(714)667-3750;or MicbAe Turfman of the Canty Sanitation Districts of Orange Count',(714)962-2411,ea 2050. For background hdormation on Boiu C]dca State Beach or California State Pario,an the contacts Gated at the top of this rekasa Post-m`hrandtaxtranwMIMem07671 ra Prins. tmpWrcesas.a.gownuks/pePr.triN dr elmE flo[DEsJ """�rytR ZTo n CSD1oc-- STA76 Pea. i��8¢3—O9ks7 run ar ' OG/e3/96 13:37:12 —> 7149626J56 Dnnald McIntyre Page 991 JUN-03-96 NON 10:35 P. 01 w CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION of SANITATION AGENCIES 9 LSu lSu 1400 9ev v)n,CA95814 T L(910144& 388—FA (919)448 M June 3, 1996 TO: CASA MEMBER AGENCIES FROM: Mike Dillon, Executive Director RE: CONSTITUTION REVISION COMMISSION UPDATE CONSTITUTION REVISION COMMISSION - BILLS INTRODUCED Almost two weeks ago, the Constitution Revision Commission formally introduced two measures to imp!ement their constitutional recommendations, in the forth of SCA 39- Killea and ACA 49-Isenberg. You may recall 6)al Senalut Kilie2 is a uuttenl member ur the CRC and Assemblyman Isenberg was a member of the CRC until January, when, as an existing appoints of former Speaker Willie Brown, he was removed by new Assembly Speaker Curt Pringle_ fhe bills have not been assigned to committee, and it is rumored that Senate Pro Tern, Bill I oc yer, may send both bills to a joint Conference Committee for consideration. Last Tuesday, the Constitution Revision Commission n.at for what was scheduled to be their last hearing before the CRC ceases to exist, by statutory requirement, on June 30, 1996. The Commission had touted Tuesday's meeting as an opportunity to "review the language" in SCA 39 and ACA 49. However, two of the new appointees of Speaker Curt Pringle decided to introduce a host of new suggestions and deletions to the bills. Commissioner Joel Fox, of the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, called the CRC's community charter concept "muddled and unnecessary" and offered a proposal which would require the State to fully fund schools, and return all property taxes to local governments. Fox further stated that perhaps, "special districts could be brought under the same kind of canopy." The Fox proposal was defeated on a vote of 6 to 11. Later, Commissioner Steven Frates offered his proposal which would have stricken everything contained In the local government portion of the bill, replacing M with only the "Budget Clarity" provision he introduced several months ago. Under the "Budget Clarity' system, the legislature would require all local government entities to provide information on all revenues, expenditures, debt and liability, in a uniform manner. This report would be generated on a monthly basis a^.d provided to the public at large for their review. In a a6/®/% 2:37:52 -> 714962®56 Donald Ilelntye Page OBZ JUN-03-96 MON 10:36 P. 02 brief scare, Frates then made reference to Speaker Pringle's Orange County consolidation bill, stating "water departments need to get together, and then make it very clear what their subscribers are paying for. tf we did nothing else but require water districts to divulge their per unit cost to consumers, I think you'd see consolidation all over the place." Said former Director of Finance, Commissioner Russell Gould, "No offense to the talent in this room, but the solutions are not going to come from Sacramento. It is going to be generated locally." In a last-ditch effort to dump the mandated community charter concept, Senator Leonard argued that the way in which the local citizens community charter board is composed "taints the process." He offered that the elected members would simply "appoint a friend" to the available appointive positions, and likened the process to that of hypothetical elected legislators able to appoint a friend to a legistative seat Said Leonard, With turf battles, etc., you don't get the real kind of discussion like you want regarding the consolidation of water districts or the increase in school districts." The motion to strike the community charter and include only "budget clarity" was summarily defeated on a vote of 6 - 12. Similarly, issues such as a move to delete the component in the bill for a majority vote for G.O. Bonds and special taxes was defeated on a vote of 7 - 11. Despite Chairman Bill Hauck's attempt to maintain Tuesday's hearing as the Commission's last, Commissioner Larry Amn was able to get approval of a twelfth-hour proposal to compensate private landowners for any devaluation of their property by government regulation. The amendment will have to be property drafted for review and vote of the Commission. Thus, a "final hearing" was called for June 27, 1996, three days before the Commission will close their doors for good. (A bill to extend the life of the Commission until January 1997 has been held under submission in committee). ocawvoTs a COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA r May 28, 1996 gaone: t714)9522411 California Regional Water Quality Control Board ,fig ; Santa Ana Region --Po.ea,9127 3737 Main Street, Suite 500 Eourmin Vella, G 1111 8272MI27 Riverside, CA 92501-3339 ateest Att: William T. Hardy, Jr., Chairman 10B44 P1 avenue ran We,ra SUBJECT: Complaint No. 96-53, Administrative Civil Liability for Sewage Spill to a270B7019 Newport Bay Dear Chairman William T. Hardy, Jr.: 1A Agendas As the Chairman of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (the Board), I have addressed this letter to your attention to be shared with the other Board members. and. Buena aa,� The Board has filed a compliant and proposes to assess an administrative penalty of cyPm:a $50,000 against the Sanitation Districts of Orange County (the Districts) for a Faaneam Vale/ rwse"te sewage spill which occurred on February 22, 1996. The Districts do accept that the nu,rongan Beach facts contained in the compliant are true, and do not object to the amount of the Habra penalty which the Board proposes to impose. The Districts took responsibility for the Haan P ty P P P P rlY u Palma spill and, on the morning of the spill, worked quickly and cooperatively with the sea AIa.aca affected residents of Newport Beach to mitigate and correct the very serious impacts IVewpa[deem P 9 rY p 0,snga caused by the discharge of sewage into homes. The Districts also accepts Pleca . Sena Ana responsibility for the failure to respond properly to the alarm from the Baybr dge seas Pump Station, a failure which led directly to the sewage spill. stamen uavn Villa Perk Some may, therefore, wonder why the Districts did not opt to simply pay the penalty Marc. unee and avoid the hearing being held today. There are two important reasons. First, <uety of orange the Districts want to be on record as supporting the public's opportunity to participate in the review of action taken by the Board in response to serious permit violations. ;Mary monicse While the Districts have an excellent record in fulfilling its wastewater management coax Mena obligations, in this instance, our performance was unacceptable and had a serious careen Grove impact on residents of Newport Beach and on the environment in Newport Harbor. Midxny Gry Before making a recommendation on action concerning this spill, we believe that the waar olao da Board staff considered both our previous record of good performance and the efforts to mitigate and correct the damage, particularly for the residents. In light of Inane Ranch these factors, we believe that the action proposed today is reasonable. However, we also believe that those who feel otherwise should have an opportunity to make their case to the Board before the matter is closed. Had we simply paid the penalty, that opportunity would have been lost. A Pualb Weseawaa,and Envrmnmenal Management Agency commuted Pmacang she Enwmnment Since 1954 W - Chairman William T. Hardy, Jr. Page 2 of 3 May 28, 1996 Our second reason for coming to the Board today is to request that the Board consider a proposal to use the money from the penalty to help correct a serious problem at one of Orange County's most popular beaches. For several months, the Districts, which monitors the surfzone in Orange County from Seal Beach to Crystal Cove State Park, have found occasional high levels of bacteria in the surfzone at Bolas Chica State Park. After many months of investigation, the Districts found that the restroom sanitary system at the State Park is in poor condition, and the bacterial contamination is likely the result of leakage from that system. Although the Districts had thought this would be an easy problem to pinpoint, we eventually spent almost $30,000 trying to confirm that the restroom sanitary system was the source of the problem. Having determined that the surfzone contamination is not from a Districts' source, the Districts has no further responsibility to ensure the safety of the beach. However, we also believe that our obligations as wastewater treatment providers require us to assist in resolving problems, rather than just turning them over to another agency. Consist with this philosophy, we have continued to work with the State Park's officials to investigate both short- and long-term solutions. We have determined that a temporary solution to the problem for this summer, including additional monitoring to ensure that the beach is safe for swimmers, will cost at least $20,000. The long-term solution, which is replacement of the sanitary system, will cost at least $500,000 and perhaps as much as $750,000. While the State Park's officials have recognized that repairing the sanitary system is their responsibility, quick access to funds for temporary control and the repairs has not yet been assured. Therefore, the Districts propose that the Board allow additional work to control the contamination at the beach and repair the system to be used as a credit against the amount of the penalty paid by the Districts. Our specific proposal is that out-of- pocket expenses (e.g., for chemicals to disinfect the sewage, for design of a new sanitary system) and incremental expenses (e.g., for analysis of surfzone samples beyond those normally collected) would be credited up to $50,000, the amount of the penalty. The Board staff has suggested to the Districts that the proposal outlined above is not acceptable because it does not target the area affected by the sewage spill. They have proposed that the Districts could do additional monitoring in Newport Harbor, monitoring which the County Health Department can no longer do because of budget cuts. While the Districts understands this proposal to tie the use of penalty funds to the specific site affected by the violation, we would respectfully suggest that Chairman William T. Hardy, Jr. Page 3 of 3 May 28, 1996 we all have a unique opportunity to serve the public interest more effectively and demonstratively by using the funds at Boise Chica. The Districts has, through its surfzone monitoring program, identified a real problem that needs a quick and effective solution. Keeping Balsa Chica State Park Beach open this summer and safe for swimming would be a very real contribution to the environment and to the public. We certainly do not question the importance of monitoring. It was, in fact, our monitoring program that identified the problem at Bolsa Chica. However, simply monitoring more in Newport Harbor will not solve any problems. It may identify more problems, but it is unlikely to result in any speck recommendations for action to protect or improve the environment. However, we would much prefer to use these funds to meet an immediate need and solve a real problem. We commend the Board and its staff for their professional fair and complete response to this violation, and we thank you for your consideration of our proposal on the use of the penalty funds. Nancy J. Whea� Director of Technical Services NJW:ahh Ref#3510LL5WOH1=m.5N c: G. Thibeault D. McIntyre B. Anderson STATE OF CAIIFORNIA-OAUFORNIA ENNRONNEMAL PROTECTION ASHY FETE WRSON, lbvmw CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD .- SANTA ANA REGION 3 AWN STREET. SUITE 500 RIVERSIDE, G 81501.3338 PNONE: (808) reY Iw FA%: (M) 7813 June 7, 1996 Mr. Donald F. McIntyre General Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P.O. Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708-7018 ADMINISTRATIVE CIVIL LIABILITY COMPLAINT NO. 96-53 Dear Mr. McIntyre: The referenced Complaint was affirmed at the May 31, 1996 meeting of the Regional Water Quality Control Board(Regional Board). The liability assessed by this complaint is$50,000,and is normally due and payable to the State Water Resources Control Board within 30 days of affirmation of the complaint. However, the Regional Board will allow County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC) to defer payment of the assessment until January 1, 1997, at which time it will become due and payable. This deferral is in consideration of a proposal to assist the California Department of Parks and Recreation (CDPR) with costs associated with providing temporary chlorination to the Bolsa Chica State Beach's failing sanitary sewer system and for a portion of the long-term solution. It has been reported to us by CDPR that the sewer system is tentatively scheduled for replacement in October, 1996. The Regional Board may consider extension of payment of the assessment beyond January 1, 1997 if there is an unavoidable delay in reimbursement to CSDOC by CDPR for the loan. The Regional Board appreciates CSDOC's forthright approach in resolving this enforcement matter and CSDOC's initiative in addressing the potential public health and water quality problems at Bolsa Chica State Beach. Sincerely, Gerar J. Thibeaul[ Executive Officer cc: Regional Board Nancy Wheatley SDM.&ff l udw CSO9506 03L V Results of Director's Workshop Questionnaire January Workshop Jerry King of the Regional Water Quality Control Board was the guest speaker for our January workshop. His speech was followed by presentations by four staff members, Blake Anderson, "The Historical Perspective of Our Planning Efforts'; Nancy Wheatley, "The Ocean Discharge Permit 301 (h)Waiver; Judy Wilson, "Changing Demographics-; and Dave Ludwin, "Strategic Plan Overview." Don McIntyre concluded the morning with an overview of the strategic policy issues. 1. Did you find this workshop valuable? Yes 8 No Comments 1. Good basis for understanding what is needed in the future. 2. This is the first'broad view' I have seen since I became a Board Member three years ago. Staff was innovative and well prepared. 3. It set a very positive tone for the meetings that were to follow. It was very informative and clearly demonstrated that staff were on top of the issues. 4. Helped put things in perspective. 5. A good idea —teaming situation. It will get better. 6. A cross-section of the inner-workings of OCSD. 7. The more in-depth information received improves our knowledge and value as a Director representing a constituency. 2. Please rate the presentations: Jerry King Excellent 4 Good 4 Fair _ Poor "The Regional Perspective" Blake Anderson Excellent 6 Good 2 Fair _ Poor _ 'The Historical Perspective of Our Planning Efforts" Nancy Wheatley Excellent 4 Good 4 Fair_ Poor_ "The Ocean Discharge Permit 301 (h)Waiver Judy Wilson Excellent 5 Good 3 Fair_ Poor_ 'Changing Demographics" Dave Ludwin Excellent 5 Good 3 Fair_ Poor "Strategic Plan Overview" 3. How could we have improved this workshop? Comments 1. More time for discussion. 2. For the first workshop, it was very good. 3. Include a Director in the planning. 4. The workshop did not need improving. 5. It would be very difficult! Nothing to add! 1 y May Workshop Bill Mills of the Orange County Water District was our guest speaker, discussing the Orange County Water Reclamation Project. Following a brief overview of the projects comprising Phase I of the Strategic Plan, Paul Brown of the consulting group Camp, Dresser& McKee led a discussion on the plan's mission statement and critical success factors. The second half of the workshop was a panel discussion with staff members Blake Anderson, Judy Wilson and Dave Ludwin. Gail Lynch from Carollo Engineers and Kelli Bum-Lucht from Camp, Dresser&McKee were also on the panel. 1. Did you find this workshop valuable? Yes 2 No 1 Comments 1. Very informative as to relationship of Sanitation District and Water District. 2. It was very informative, and dealt with a topic that is very important and will become much more important...water reclamation. 3. Staff is working hard to communicate. 4. We did not have a good process on the"Mission Statement"and critical success factors. 5. 1 think this plan has to be done soon, the concept and where and how it is going is greatl 6. The more in-depth information received improves our knowledge and value as a Director representing a constituency. 2. Please rate the following: Bill Mills Excellent 3 Good 4 Fair _ Poor _ "OC Water Reclamation" Discussion on the Strategic Plan's Excellent 4 Good 2 Fair 2 Poor 2 Mission Statement and Critical Success Factors Panel Discussion Excellent 2 Good 4 Fair 1 Poor _ Blake Anderson Judy Wilson Dave Ludwin Gail Lynch Kell! Burn-Lucht 3. How could we have improved this workshop? Comments 1. I was concerned about Directors "resentment"of mission statement. I hope it doesn't glitch the plan to have Directors involved in future planning or feel it is staff doing planning that they simply satisfy. 2. 1 don't really care for the panel discussion format. Would prefer to hear the issues and then to hear the staff present options and substantive analysis behind those options. 3. Too much time wasted on semantics regarding mission statement. 4. The consultant was a disaster. He caused a rift between staff and Directors. Very poorly presented—the order of the agenda was off. Mission statement very poorly presented—it felt adversarial. 5. The facilitator did not do a good job. Very difficult to involve such a large group in a discussion of the mission and critical success factors. He seemed bewildered. He repeated himself often and did not move on when he could have. People lost their focus and the attention span evaporated. 6. Why not media at workshop? People out there should have some idea of what is going to happen. Should know of plans and why it is being done! 7. Keep similar format! 2 v Overall Program Evaluation 1. Are the workshops meeting your information needs? Yes 8 No Comments 1. We all need to better understand the Districts' responsibility to Orange County constituents. 2. Forces Directors to understand the issues and the challenges the Sanitation District faces. It also instills confidence in the Directors with regard to the abilities of the staff. 3. There is a lot to learn. 4. 1 think they are very important because they allow Directors to understand issues in greater depth. 5. Insight to the workings of the Districts on a hands-on level. 6. Enhances role as a Director. 2. Is Saturday morning the best time for you to attend a Board Workshop? Yes 8 No _ PJtemative days/times 1. Late afternoon would be OK. 2. Thursday evenings. 3. Our next Workshop will be in September when we will be presenting the initial results of our investigation of the ocean outfall. Do you have a suggestion for a format or type of presentation you would find most helpful? Suggestions 1. Assume that we don't know how it works and educate us. Then inform us of the issues and costs. Then give us the staffs recommendations and reasons for those suggestions. 2. You don't need a consultant. Questions and answers always work well after presentation. Repeat trip to outfall opportunity. 3. This should be an easier presentation than the last because it does not involve so much subjectiveness as previous workshop. 4. Slides of what is down there and what has to be done to get to where we are going. 5. Visual as well as oral presentation! 4. Do you have any additional comments for improving Board Strategic Planning Workshops? 1. Somehow we need better attendance than the last meeting. 2. More opportunity for open discussion. 3. You might consider breaking the Directors into groups, giving each group a problem and having them present a solution. (Or some variation based on your objectives.) 4. 1 believe we are on the right track by having these workshops. The Sanitation District is too large and complex not to have them. Keep the presentation simple and don't assume too much! 5. Don't be so formal! We are used to study sessions and"rolling up our sleeves" in a workshop setting. 6. Tell us your needs, goals, issues—We are part of the team, and are used to solving problems. 7. Other than the one workshop which was problematic, I think things are going well. 8. The format has been good each time. Very well done. Question time to focus more on what is being covered. MTlcg J MPI)MCOMMSEGMSURVEY. 3 June 13, 1996 MEMORANDUM TO: Plant 2 Operations and Maintenance Staff FROM: Doug Cook Plant#2 Chief Operator SUBJECT: June 1,1996 and June 6, 1996 Power Outages On Saturday June 1, 1996 and Thursday June 6, 1996, Plant #2 experienced a complete loss of both Edison and CenGen power. This loss caused a total loss of our ability to move and process wastewater flow through the facility. In both cases, the responding operations and maintenance staff, through their fast response to these two emergencies, prevented the accidental discharge of both treated and untreated wastewater into the public environment . These are the types of emergencies that staff trains and prepares for, and it is this same training and preparation which successfully enabled us to meet these two crises. I would like to take a moment to recognize the Wednesday through Saturday A.M. shift Operation staff and the responding standby Maintenance personnel who successfully stabilized and restarted the Plant after the June 1, 1996 outage. For the June 6, 1996 outage, I would like to recognize the Operation staffs for day shift and the Wednesday through Saturday P.M. shift and the Maintenance personnel who through teamwork, quickly stabilized and restored the Plant. To the personnel involved, it was your training, teamwork, and commitment to this facility which successfully brought us through these two emergencies, and on behalf of O&M management, I'd like to thank each of you. DC:II R:\WPDOCU48OM-COOKW EMOS.961960P0420.MEM c: Don McIntyre Blake Anderson Bob Ooten File CSD00 • P.O. Elm 8127 * Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 0 (714)962.2411 Lrdj ; The orange County Reuter STATE SI1llday, May 19, 1996 Report: PG&E cost cutting left customers in the darks; UTILITIES: Competition ►PG&E told regulators last 'world-class service; " wrote has forced 1 Q(jllCtIODS In year, for example, that 20 per- PG&E maintenance supervisor cent to 30 percent of its power Paul Mackin in a February 1995 ;y maintenance, re(o'tis poles were rotten and needed to letter to state officials. They i show. When a Storm jilt be replaced or reinforced. In have not been receiving it now, 1998,the company spent$1,519 on and certainly won't get it with in December, 5 million maintenance for each mile of less employees taking care of an r, were without power. poles and power lines.By 1994,it already overwhelmingly deterio- P was spending just $1,141, the rating system." 4 'The Associated Press Mercury News said. After an investigation of 1.4 .� ►A 1995 consultant's report million customer outages in a . SAN JOSE — Pack Gas & stated that trimmers would need January 1995 storm, state regu- :Electric Co. said nasty weather, three years to clear all the trees lators concluded that employee :not cost-cutting, caused more growing over power lines. The reductions,longer inspection ry- than 5 million Northern Califor- Arthur Andersen report said cles and a poorly designed tele- uia customers to lose power — three-quarters of PG&E power phone system hindered PG&E's :some for as many as eight days outages may be caused by trees response in January and March — last December. touching or falling on power lines 1995. But the commission said it . But stateand company records and that half of these outages lacked evidence to say PG&E . show that stiff competition has were preventable. had "unreasonably compro- forced the utility to systematical- ►In the two years preceding mired service and safety." dy dismantle its maintenance the consultant's 1995 report, That's when PG&E began to :system, according to a report in PG&E eliminated 28 percent of rethink its maintenance prac- today's San Jose Mercury News. its work force,including three of tices,calling off a plan to trim an "When the first major storm of every 10 workers who built and additional 8W jobs and ordering :the winter hit the West Coast on repaired such lines.Between De- more thorough inspections of Dec.11,PG&E was prepared,"a cember 1985 and December 1994, power lines. recent company report boasted. PG&E pared its total work force The company also began But company maintenance re- from 29;714 to 20,871. counting trees growing near :ports and financial statements, ►Fires,electrocutions and ex- power lines and found almost in addition to state records and plosions—often caused by faulty twice as many to trim as it had dozens of Mercury News inter- electrical equipment or a lack of previously thought. .views, reveal a relentless cost- tree trimming—have forced the In April, PG&E asked state 'rotting mentality at PG&E that company to pay millions of dol- regulators to let it charge cus- set the scene for the worst black. lars to victims. Meanwhile, tomers an extra $100 million be- out since 1981. many of the costs are passed on ginning next year,to pay for this PG&E managers said, "Cut to customers. Burry of tree trimming and other cost at any cost or we'll find ►Many customers didn't get work it described as "acceler- .someone who will"as the compa. the repairs they paid for. Since ated maintenance." ny spent less and less on mainte- 1990, PG&E has billed consum- But consumer advocates at the ranee, the accounting firm Ar- ers at least$231 million for main- Public Utilities Commission pro- ;bur Andersen& Co. wrote in an tename and other work that tested the proposal this month, August 1995 report. wasn't done, the Mercury News calling it"contrary to the public The reason? PG&E has long reported. interest" felt the pressures of increased While profits have increased PUC investigators are sched- :competition in a deregulated for shareholders, the average uled to release their latest report ;electricity market in which cus. PG&E customer sat in the dark Friday. tomers can choose a power pro- for 10 hours last year — four But the scrutiny is far from .vider much like a long-distance times longer than in 1992 and 70 over for PG&E. telephone service. percent longer than 1989, the New hearings on the utility's PG&E executives maintain year of the Loma Prieta earth- maintenance practices begin that the cuts are necessary if the quake. June 17 in San Francisco. The utility is to survive. They also "I can't be comfortable when it company could be found or forced . :call their response to the Demon- rains," said Robert Kundus of to pay customers reparations for ' 'bar storm "admirable." Las Gatos, who lost power 26 reduced reliability of their elec- . "Over the '80s, we were going times last year. "I'm just wait- meal service. :through what every other com- ing for the thud....This system is r :pany was going through, which so primitive that Thomas Edison was get the fat out," Senior Vice himself would recognize it" President and General Manager Even some of PG&E's own am - Robert Haywood said. "Custom- ployees have told state utility :ers would want us to do that." regulators that they should've Still, records show that PG&E stepped in to prevent the cuts. has long known that its mainte- "PG&E customers ... have nance system was suffering: been paying for safe and reliable CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION of SANITATION AGENCIES a 926 L Street,Suite 1400 Snoamenw CA 95814 TEL 1916)446-0588-FAX(916)4484808 MEMORANDUM TO: All CASA Members WCHABL F.DD:LON E.U.Dimntm& sure UffWa6re A8rmet. FROM: Thomas L. Woodruff, President RORBRTA L CARBON Db.aeNRe9.hmry ADaim DATE: June 4, 1996 F m a,nt Re: Federal Legislative Report TROA LWOODRUFF County&Mutlon Due . orp 'County 701 S..N Perler M...07W O ,,CA9288B (714)ABF2805 FA%(714)W-U05 I recently returned from attending the Annual Conference of the smmm'-'n.a•m.r Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies ("AMSA"), in Washington, c W.m�a Nmau R D.C., where I had the opportunity to visit several Congressional Offices ti00 Davi nn Street concerning pending legislative proposals of interest and concem to Novato.CA 94M (415)W2.1984 wastewater agencies. let Vim Pma mt cimpj T 9r2YlWNSBND The Conference sessions were very informative, and numerous Carmel Arne%.U.W Diet representatives of the Environmental Protection Agency made PAY, °R presentations concerning current programs and policies of the Al,ve WatrrA9mU Environmental Protection Agency. The Legal Affairs Committee reviewed a considerable number of current issues during its half-day workshop, DI CWO ATLAROR including a study of a recent California Appellate Court decision upholding JA sB.BBWLer an enforcement action by the Los Angeles City Attorney relating to a so.% Rar.�Ae criminal conviction under the Fish & Game Code for discharging refuse to System ayMde ty r9 9 MFFRBY O.HANSPN the waters of the State, notwithstanding that such discharge was pursuant Dublin San Jinn..&e . to and in accordance with the terms of its NPDES Permit. SU&41V HCNULTY RADVBY Ca.trai Ca.tm Cmu There are several major environmental bills proposed by Congress, Sanitary Dladd including Reauthorization of the Clean Water Act, as well as major RONALD E.YOUNG amendments to Superfund, and the Safe Drinking Water Act. However, IM..Ra"6 W.W Di`t other than the Safe Drinking Water Act, which has passed the Senate, the general opinion is that no other measures are likely to get enacted during BRresAFrRATsrN this Congress, in light of the pending elections and the major political F.Aeml Ia2ielaEm A&om. ENS Rmo mm differences. 1120Connm mt Are,N.W. Suits SW Wmhin9ton,D.C.ROOM (202)4B63755 FM(202)4B6-2797 Page Two June 4, 1996 In light of a recent decision by a U.S. Court of Appeals, holding a Publicly-Owned Treatment Works legally and financially responsible for damages to an underground water supply, due to toxins discharged by a private party, but which leaked out of the agency's sewers, it seems critical that local sewer agencies obtain legislative relief through amendments to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation & Liability Act (Superfund). Thus, it was important to present our position and request to key members of Congress. I was accompanied by Bob Miele of the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts; Cheryl Creeson of the Sacramento Regional Wastewater District; and CASA's Washington, D.C. Lobbyist, Eric Sapirstein. We spent approximately 30 minutes each with the Legislative Director for Senator Feinstein; the Legislative Director for Senator Boxer, the Legislative Assistant for Congressman Stephen Horn (R. Cal. - 38th District, Los Angeles and Long Beach), and the Senior Counsel to the House Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment. Without exception, we were warmly and sincerely received, with expressions of support for our requested position. We had scheduled these meetings and provided considerable written materials to each, in advance. Specifically, we are proposing an amendment to Superfund that would exclude POTW s from liability under the Act for any damage that results solely from doing our job of accepting industrial wastewater discharges to the POTW s system. The exclusion would require the POTWs to have an approved pre-treatment program adopted (most Districts do), and would not apply if the POTW was negligent or guilty of intentional misconduct. This amendment is very important to our Member Agencies. I will continue to apprise you of developments. THOMAS L WOODRUFF PRESIDENT 7LW VI cc: Mr. Michael F. Dillon June 19, 1996 Progress Report Strategic Plan The following includes the Planning Division's progress report for the Strategic Plan from the beginning of the Subject Plan through the month of June 1996. This report covers all three projects for Phase I, Job Nos. J-39, J40-1 and J40-2. Project Workshops and Meetings Completed: • April 17th, District Staff Review Workshop. A Project Quality Management kick-off meeting was conducted at the Districts. Key principals, activities and tasks were developed. A mission statement was also drafted. A general agenda for the projects were established. • April 24th, Project Staff and Consultant Coordination Meeting. Consultants identified information and assistance required from CSDOC. Data gathering tasks were clarified. • May 3rd, Community Workshop Development. A meeting was held to focus on the community participation in workshops and stakeholder identification. • May 4th, Board Workshop. A meeting was held with CSDOC's Board of Directors to present goals and objectives on Phase I, discussed results from PQM kick-off meeting, review the workshop process and receive Board feedback on the direction of the project. • May 14th, District Staff Brown Bag Presentation. A presentation by consultants was held at CSDOC to introduce employees to the Strategic Plan. Over 70 employees attended the meeting. • May 31st, District Staff Planning Session on Public Workshop No. 1. A meeting was held to cover all details for Workshop No. 1. • June 13th, Workshop No. 1. The first public workshop was held to promote public participation concerning financial and environmental issues surrounding the Strategic Plan. A Rate Advisory Committee is being formed to secure equitable representation by all sectors of the Orange County community. • A final draft of the Rate Advisory Committee was prepared on June 14th. The applicants chosen will be contacted by the Technical Services Department to arrange for a first meeting. Work Completed • All cities and regional agencies have been contacted regarding land use data and demographic data. Visits have been made to all cities, L.ACSD, and Fullerton Center for Demographic data. • Staff provided consultants with a copy of CSDOC's electronic AutoCAD version of Thomas Brothers maps to begin development of a base map for geographically integrating project data. • A contract was awarded to ADS to provide monitoring services. • CSDOC submitted a substantial amount of the technical data requested by consultants for the trunk sewers, plants and other system facilities. Work in Progress: • The Planning Division is currently developing the Scope of Work for Phase II and III of the Strategic Plan. • Two cores of the 120-inch pipe will be taken the week of July 8th (at 30' and 100' depth). • Monitoring at some 30 locations will begin mid-July to verify flow generation rates and establish a base flow against which storm flow will be monitored. Budget: • We are spending at a higher rate than anticipated, primarily due to the monitoring, but it is too early to predict if overruns will occur. • We may propose more work in Phase II and Phase III than planned, but money is available in related amounts. Needed Items: We need to meet with the RWQCB as soon as possible to discuss the ocean outfall issue. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA June 24, 1996 pbon (71419522411 nailing address: OMTS MINUTES OMITTED FROM THE PO.Bn.8127 Fottnedsn Valley CA THE JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS AGENDA PACKAGE 92]2"12] FOR JUNE 26, 1996 west address: 10944 Olis Avenue Fountain Vall,CA 92]OB]016 PLEASE INSERT THE ATTACHED OMTS MINUTES [ATTACHMENT ITEM 1 B(B)] IN YOUR BOARD AGENDA PACKAGE FOR JOINT BOARDS Member MEETING OF JUNE 26, 1996. Agencies 0 THANK YOU. Cities Anaheim Brea Buena Park cypress Feunwin Valley Fullerton Huntington Beach Irvine Le Habra Le Palms Los Atomizes Newport Beech Orange Plaeent. Santa Are Seal Beach Stanton n.h Ville Park Verbs Linda County of Orange Sanitary Districts Costa Mesa Garden Grove Midway City Water Districts Irvine Ranch 4 Pubflc Wastewater and Environmental Management Agency Committed to Protecting the Environment Since 1954 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California P.O. Box 8127• 108"Ellis Avenue ✓ Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY JUNE S. 1996 -5:30 P.M. A regular meeting of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 61 7, 11, 13, and 14 of Orange County, California was held on May 1, 1996, at the Districts' Administrative Office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was taken and a quorum declared present, as follows: Committee Directors Present: Staff Present: Pat McGuigan, Chair Don McIntyre, General Manager John C. Cox Jr., Joint Chair Judy Wilson, Chief Administrative Officer Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair Ed Hodges, Director of General Services Adm. Barry Denes David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Norman Z. Eckenrode Bob Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance James M. Ferryman Gary Streed, Director of Finance Mark Murphy Nancy J. Wheatley, Director of Technical Services Chris Norby Ed Torres, Engineering Supervisor, Operations Sal Sapien Mike Moore, Principal Environmental Specialist Mark Esquer, Engineering Supervisor, Operations Angela Holden, Committee Secretary Absent Victor Leipzig, Vice Chair Others Present None Minutes of Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Meeting Page 2 June 20, 1996 (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM Director Sal Sapien was appointed as Chair Pro Tem. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments received. (4) REPORTS OF COMMITTEE CHAIR, GENERAL MANAGER,ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER, DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE, DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES,AND GENERAL COUNSEL (a) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Chair Pat McGuigan reminded the Committee of the public meeting on our Strategic Plan set for June 13, 5:00-7:00 PM at McGarvin Middle School. The notice was mailed to approximately 1400 people including all industrial permittees. There will be a series of about eight or nine workshops over the next ten months looking at all three projects that we are undertaking. This is for stakeholder(ratepayer) input to the decision process. Chair McGuigan discussed a luncheon meeting with the Mayor of Indianapolis regarding privatization that some other Directors also attended. This mayor mentioned that the worst time to privatize is in a "fire sale" atmosphere. Various ways of reducing costs were discussed. Chair McGuigan concluded that a lot of things discussed at this meeting are things that the Districts are planning on doing (cross-training). The Mayor mentioned they look at the product not the process. One comment mentioned was they (Board) establish policy thereby getting the Board out of the day-to-day activities. Another quote was"Control systems suffocate efficiency." It is expected that the Register will do a piece on this. Staff may want to look at getting a copy of the tape. (b) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER General Manager, Don McIntyre, discussed the status of the Pringle Bill - Tom Woodruf's judgement is that it will focus on water wholesalers only. Therefore, the Districts will not be part of the Bill. Joint Chair John Cox added legislation information heads-up on air quality legislation re Bills SB836, SB1603 (Lewis Bills) and AB3248. These bills are oil industries taking on the Air District. Districts' concern would be that these bills are focusing on taking out the AB2766 funding that comes to cities, Air District and to a discretionary fund that is used for reducing mobile-source air emission in this basin. AB3248 is talking about taking those funds and spending it on scrappage program. Directors may want to track it, send letters, cards etc. Minutes of Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Meeting Page 3 June 20, 1996 (c) REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER No report was given by either AGM. (d) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE Bob Ooten reported that we have received the Edison ENVEST Report. Staff is reviewing it and hopes to report back to the Committee for approval of this project at the July OMTS meeting. (e) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES Nancy Wheatley reported on four items: 1. Discussed the background information regarding the LA Times article on Bolsa Chica (copy of article handed out). 2. Gave background information on another article that was in the Register regarding the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) Hearing on the Districts' penalty for the Newport Beach sewage spill. The RWQCB unanimously supported that we be allowed to loan the State Parks the$50,000 until the Slate Parks gets their funding for the reconstruction system of Bolsa Chica then State Parks will pay the Districts back and we will then send the $50,000 to the Clean- up and Abatement Fund. We are working out an interagency agreement whereby State Parks hires the Districts to manage the reconstruction of the sewer system. When staff receive an agreement we will bring it before OMTS Committee. 3. Responded to questions asked at the Steering Committee about surplus Lab equipment. A list of equipment has been prepared (handed out). This list is in two parts: equipment that is usable in the Lab which we intend to keep, and equipment which we don't believe is useful to staff and we would recommend surplusing. Staff will bring this before the July OMTS Committee. 4. Regarding SAWPA Agreement: Next Tuesday SAWPA will vote to approve the Agreement. This agreement should be ready to present at the Joint Board Meeting on June 26, 1996. (fl GENERAL COUNSEL No report was given. (5) APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF MAY 1 1996 MEETING With two typos noted, minutes were moved, seconded and carried as written. Minutes of Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Meeting W Page 4 June 20, 1996 (6) FAHR96-36: Consideration of Report from Don McIntyre and Staff on the Proposed 1996-97 Budgets to be Considered by the Finance Administration and Human Resources Committee and the Joint Boards of Directors at their June 1996 Meetings. General Manager, Don McIntyre, gave an overview of the Proposed Budget (handed out). Discussion included the organizational changes, how the proposal is tracking the actual costs rather than approved or adopted budget, strategies to reduce staffing needs, actions to reduce cost, transferring 1% of payroll and 1% of service and supplies budget to a General Manager's contingency fund for flexibility, actions needed to be competitive, status of appropriated reserves and the seven critical goals for 1996-97. Finance Director, Gary Streed, continued by going through the Proposed Budget section-by- section to point out highlights, changes from past budgets and new features. The format of the budget manual is set up so that the first section is more general and as you read on it becomes more specific. (7) OLD BUSINESS Consideration of the following for review or action: OMTSSS-020: Closing Report on the Implementation of the 38 Recommendations Made as Part of the Ernst and Young Audit of the Operations and Maintenance Departments. Director of Operations and Maintenance, Bob Ooten, discussed the report. Moved, seconded and carried that this report is now finalized. (8) NEW BUSINESS Consideration of the following for review or action: OMTS96-011: Staff Report Regarding the Results of the Hydrogen Sulfide Scrubber Automation Study. There was a tour of the scrubber prior to this meeting. Ed Torres, Engineering Supervisor of Operations, discussed this study. Staff will be installing an automated chemical monitoring and feed system on one scrubber at Plant No. 2 and conducting a prototype and testing for a couple more months to determine performance during warm weather and installation and maintenance costs. Staff will report back to OMTS for recommendation and test results. Minutes of Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Meeting Page 5 June 20, 1996 OMTS96-012 Consideration of Motion to Authorize the General Manager to Enter into a Lease/Purchase Agreement with Scientific Utilization, Inc. to Acquire a Sludge Arc Treatment System for Performance Testing of Sludge Destruction and Methane Gas Production, for a Period not to Exceed 60 Months at a Monthly Rate Not to Exceed $6,400, For a Total Price Not to Exceed $384,000, Such Agreement can be Terminated at the General Manager's Discretion Without Penalty. Ed Torres, Engineering Supervisor of Operations, gave a presentation on this system. After completion of the five-month performance test, staff will come back with a recommendation to: continue the lease, purchase the unit or discontinue ft. This will be on the December or January OMITS Committee agenda. Moved, seconded and carried to approve staffs recommendation. OMTS96-013 Consideration of Resolution 96-_Authorizing Staff to Procure Natural Gas from a Private Marketer and Award Contract for Purchase of Natural Gas to PanEnergy Trading and Market Services, Inc., for a Discount Price of $0.0221million British Thermal Units (MMBTU) Below the Monthly Natural Gas Intelligence Index Price, for a Two-Year Period Beginning August 1, 1996 (Estimated Annual Cost $660,700). Mark Esquer, Engineering Supervisor of Operations, gave the presentation. The bidders invited to bid were approved by the Southern California Gas Company-they gave us the list of ten companies that are approved to provide service within the Gas Company jurisdiction and that have a track record. Staff will pull the financial information that was submitted to the Board Secretary and put ft in the agenda package'for the Joint Boards meeting. Director McGuigan requested staff to give her more detailed information prior to the presentation at the Joint Board meeting. 'submitted in the Board letter Moved, seconded and carried to approve staffs recommendation. OMTS96-014 Consideration of Motion to Extend Science Applications International Corporation's (SAIC) Year 10 Contract (Specification No. 5.032, Amendment 11, Resolution 94-60) From June 30, 1996 to October 31, 1996 at No Additional Cost No discussion was needed. Moved, seconded and carried to approve staffs recommendation. Minutes of Operations, Maintenance and ' Technical Services Committee Meeting Page 6 June 20, 1996 (9) CLOSED SESSION The Chair declared there were no items for closed session. (10) OTHER BUSINESS, IF ANY (14) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING (15) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT (16) NEXT MEETING (a) July OMTS meeting will be held July 11, 1996. (b) There will NOT be an OMTS Meeting in August. (17) OTHER ANNOUNCEMENTS, IF ANY None. (18) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared themeeting adjourned at 8:15 p.m. Angela tpUden Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Secretary J:Wry\95101angelalnm NunebnlnNe5.596 uWD�D, WOODRUFF, SFRADLIN & SMART A PROPEL 0 CO MMON W1 SO PARBER S77=.SURE M F ORANGE,CA 9166R<M (114)55bN F FAX(714)83SM p rDIALM4)EF0.2 CMVr FAX(?KS 25W June 13, 1996 Mr. Matthew Sarboraria Legislative Aide CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE State Capitol Post Office Box 942649 Sacramento, CA 94249-0001 Re: AB 2109 (Pringle) Dear Matt: Just a note to again extend my thanks and appreciation for the time which you provided last week in sharing with me the current status of AB 2109 and the thoughts of the Speaker relative to its progress. As I noted, I cannot help but be impressed with how rapidly you have succeeded in coming up to speed on all of the important facets, as well as the nuances, of such proposed legislation. I also want to reaffirm our offer to provide any further thoughts or assistance that may be of help to you or the Speaker in the processing of this measure. I have recently learned that the Speaker wants all possible amendments to be delivered to him not later than July 5th. In that regard, I am not sure there is anything further that I can suggest on behalf of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. As was noted in the course of our meeting, the distinction between the Sanitation Districts and the retail water purveyors is so great, as to make it most difficult to include in a single comprehensive bill. However, if you have any particular thoughts or questions, I would ask that you contact me as soon as possible. I will immediately work on addressing those concerns. 9 YC.AN W F"Y E BNMAV•M.WE BOR .R C.9URNERF1 LCAVAI RCRAM O.FARRd K RODNLX RM R KE5 W.MR W•WE E h}FRfl s MAOMIFNh IGM-P RT10MAf F.MEN RL NE XESILIX WNN X SMW•XPNNMD0.SM ,DLFD L SPENCE R DAN®.K SPRADLiN R A X WAM 0 1NOMA5 L WOODRUFF Mr. Matthew Sarboraria June 13, 1996 Page 2 1 expect that you will be hearing from the representatives of the water and sewer agencies in the South County with regards to any speck proposals in the next couple of weeks. I will make it a point to call you around that time to see if there is any additional information that is needed, as far as the Sanitation Districts are concerned. Very truly yours, WOODRUFF, SPR/�A��DLIINN & SMART THOMAS L. WOODRUFF GENERALCOUNSEL - CSDOC TLW:mm cc: ✓Joint Chairman and Members of the Boards of Directors Mr. D.F. Mclnctyre Ms. J.A. Wilson moo-000aa 311411 WOODRUFF, SPRADLRV & SMART n PaOFEa 0 COnm MN NI SOUTH PARM STRM, SUITE NOD•ORANGE, CA (714)SS&TOW FAX(714)V5-nV DRECT p (714)5S&ARO5 D Cr FM(714)S6S]5(YS June 7, 1996 Assemblyman Richard Ackerman Member of the Assembly State Capital Sacramento, Ca. 95814 Dear Assemblyman Ackerman: I want to again extend my thanks for the time which you made available to meet with me yesterday concerning pending AB 2109 (Pringle) as it impacts the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California ("CSDOC'). As was noted, we are certainly aware of your familiarity with local government, and particularly local government in Orange County, even to the extent of knowing the strengths and weaknesses of all various forms of local agencies. On behalf of CSDOC, I can tell you we are greatly appreciative of your understanding of the clear distinction between CSDOC and the retail water and sanitary agencies. As you had suggested, we are continuing to keep an open line of discussion going with Speaker Pringle and his Staff. I had that occasion later in the afternoon and was pleased to learn that it is the current intent of the Speaker to either amend the Bill or use some other vehicle to recognize some progress and commitments that have been made as they pertain to the South County agencies. I am certain that that still remains to be resolved, but we were also advised that he recognizes that CSDOC, as well as perhaps the wholesale water districts, are not the appropriate subject for combining into a single entity with the retail agencies. His Staff has been very careful to analyze the data provided by CSDOC, and that, combined with your input to him, has been of considerable value insofar as CSDOC is concerned. Again, I would tell you that the Directors at CSDOC are pledged unanimously to programs of increasing the efficiency of government, and that includes consolidation, where appropriate. TEARY C ANDRUS•M E&NNM M.W4 HOBO: BEI'IV C.BNOhTi•mm E GVA.WWH•C 0G.FA N=N MD610.F .IOSFpH W.MA TH LOBEIEFFREY MAODNII:A WNMM1ANTA THOMAS F.MON•JA KE MKIM MW 0.SM..RFNNA HMACC,M-DANH31.SF6YCE E SPM -N P.WAM•WO"L WOODRUFF v Assemblyman Richard Ackerman June 7, 1996 Page 2 I had left some material with you when I had occasion to be by your office approximately a month ago, but I am taking the opportunity to give you some up-dated material, particularly the recent correspondence to the Speaker, so that you know exactly where CSDOC stands on this proposal. Very truly yours, WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART THOCMAASS L. WOODRUFF GENERAL COUNSEL - CSDOC nW yl cc: Joint Chairman and Members of Boards of Directors Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager Blake P. Anderson, Assistant General Manager- Operations Judith A Wilson, Assistant General Manager -Administration LAW OFFlCFS OF WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART A PRO ox Cow =N MI SOUTH PARKER SIAEEr, SUITE 9 • ORANGE,CA n6684=F (714)53$- OD•FAX(714)slYr Y DIRECT OD,L(714)560.26D5 DIRECT FM(714)56535X June 7, 1996 Senator Ross Johnson State Capitol Sacramento, Ca. 95814 Dear Senator Johnson: I want to again thank you so much for extending me the time on June 5th to review the issues and concems of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California C'CSDOC") as they would be impacted by AB 2109 (Pringle). In furtherance of your suggestions, I did have occasion to meet with the Speakers Staff later in the day, and was pleased to find that considerable progress is being made by all interested parties towards reaching some resolution. Particularly, we were advised that the Speaker now is giving strong consideration to segregating the issues by not attempting to merge water retailers with water wholesalers, or with the sanitation agencies. On behalf of CSDOC, we pledged our support, and I am certain that our Directors will in fact continue to pursue their own efforts which were initiated nearly one year ago to finalize out the last portions of their own consolidation study. As indicated, I am enclosing a package of materials that would be helpful to you and your Staff to better identify CSDOC, a description of their mission, and how that is accomplished. Again, on behalf of the Directors and Management of CSDOC, we thank you for your consideration in this very serious proposal. Very truly yours, WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART THOMAS L. WOODRUFF GENERAL COUNSEL- CSDOC RWpj cc: Joint Chairman and Members of Boards of Directors Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager Blake P. Anderson, Assistant General Manager- Operations Judith A. Wilson, Assistant General Manager-Administration T C.ANDRUS•M Y E BINtUNO•AL MM WJ •6Er1Y C 6URNCIT•IOFDI E UVANAUDN•C o.FARRDIDT)N RODOLRF •IOSPPN W.FOF M S UNS E aFH1EY•MAODAIBIA IUNA-W •'INOMAS F.NDWN.AiIONE R@MZ WNN L SNAW•KPNNMD L S .IR•IWIM L SPkNOi•DA K-SPRMIai•A 0.WATTS•1NOMA5 L WOOpA1WF AGENDA BOARDS OF DIRECTORS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 REGULAR MEETING JUNE 26, 1996 -7:30 P.M. ..__._.._.._..._.._._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._..._.._..._..._.._.._.._..._.._.._.._............_._.._._.._................. __, i In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this j agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the Districts'Administrative Offices not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Boards i for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an 's emergency item or that there is a need to lake immediate action which need came to the f i attention of the Districts subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. i ...................... (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll call (3) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders) (4) Appointment of Chair pro tem, if necessary (5) Nominations for Joint Chair(Election to be held at regular July Board Meeting) (6) Public Comments, All persons wishing to address the Boards on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot have action taken by the Boards of Directors except as authorized by Section 54954.2(b). 06/26/96 (7) The Joint Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on ` miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. (a) Report of Joint Chair; consideration of Resolutions or commendations, presentations and awards (b) Report of General Manager (c) Report of General Counsel (8) EACH DISTRICT If no corrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair. District 1 - May 22, 1996 regular District 2 - May 22, 1996 regular District 3 - May 22, 1996 regular District 5 - May 22, 1996 regular District 6 - May 22, 1996 regular District 7 - May 22, 1996 regular District 11 - May 22, 1996 regular District 13 - May 22, 1996 regular District 14 - May 22, 1996 regular ALL DISTRICTS (9) Consideration of roll call vole motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vole will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District.) ALL DISTRICTS 05/15/96 05/29/96 MISC. Joint Operating Fund - $ 873,862.52 $649,841.92 $ 108.00 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 1,129,139.06 468,108.82 45,329.20 Joint Working Capital Fund - 175,513.91 353,691.31 104,981.08 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 12,365.75 65,556.09 24,910.87 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 1,353.52 15,841.05 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 5,966.70 51,909.72 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 113,117.80 764,027.81 0.00 DISTRICT NO, 5 - 4,340.63 6,624.88 0.00 DISTRICT NO, 6 - 12,468.02 7,662.86 0.00 DISTRICT NO, 7 - 15,375.16 227,958.14 0.00 DISTRICT NO, 11 - 223,476.09 76,791.90 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 13 - 0.00 78.70 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 14 - 27.25 518.85 0.00 DISTRICTS NOS, 3 8 11 JOINT - 0.00 5,112.50 0.00 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 11,677.18 133,139.68 0.00 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 5,043.13 213.52 0.00 DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 6,886.43 810.91 0.00 $2,590,613.15 $2,827,888.66 $175,329.15 -2- 06/26/96 CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEMS (10) - (15) i All matters placed on the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or i further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the I consent calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions ? included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be 3 considered in the regular order of business. i i € Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon i i recognition by the chair, slate their name, address and designate by number the item to be i removed from the consent calendar. ! j The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. i Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: ALL DISTRICTS (10) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) in an amount not to exceed $185,000.00 for payment of various fees required by SCAQMD regulations, payable during fiscal year 1996-97, estimated as follows: Type of Fee Amount Annual Emissions $80.000.00 Annual Operating Permits 40,000.00 CARB Emissions 15,000.00 Compliance Source Testing 20,000.00 Permit & Plan Applications 20,000.00 Miscellaneous 10,000.00 TOTAL $185,000.00 (11) Consideration of Resolution No. 96-54, Amending Personnel and Salary Resolution No. 95-105, to Reflect Agreement With Represented Employee Units to Substitute the MetraHealth Point-of-Service Plan for the Northwestern National Life Medical Coverage; Fund Dependent Medical Premiums at 80% and Employee- Only Coverage at 100%; Convert Dental Insurance from Self-Funded to Fully- Insured Through Delta Dental, and, Amend Plan Documents Accordingly Effective July 1, 1996. -3- 06/26/96 ALL DISTRICTS (12) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager, or his designee, to designate members of the Boards and/or staff to attend and participate in various training programs, meetings, hearings, conferences, facility inspections and other functions which, in his opinion, will be of value to the Districts or affect the Districts' interests, including, but not limited to, those conducted by organizations providing specific training, state and federal legislative and regulatory bodies and the California Association of Sanitation Agencies, California Water Environment Association, Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies, and the Water Environment Federation; and authorizing reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging and incidental expenses in accordance with existing Districts' policies and the approved annual budget for 1996-97. (13) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to approve travel of James Harris, Districts' staff engineer, to attend the witness testing of blower equipment required in connection with Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36-2, tentatively scheduled from July 29, 1996 through August 2, 1996 in Denmark (travel, lodging and incidental expenses to be paid by Margate Construction, Inc.). DISTRICT 2 (14) Consideration of motion approving Interim Settlement Agreement with Security Capital Investment Trust, providing for deferral of determination of total fees due, pending outcome of District's study of connection fees. DISTRICT 7 (15) Consideration of motion to receive and file Summons & Complaint for Personal Injury, Property Damage, and General Negligence Premises Liability, Daisy Brood vs. Calfon Construction, Inc., at al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 764464, relative to personal injuries and property damage sustained in connection with the construction of Parallel and Replacement Portions of Lemon Heights Subtrunk Sewer, La Colina Drive to Newport Boulevard, Contract No. 7-22, and Manhole Access Modifications to RA-14 Sewer at Newport Boulevard and Cowan Heights Drive, Contract No. 7-24; and authorize the District's General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the District. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (16) Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any -4- O6/26196 NON-CONSENT CALENDAR ALL DISTRICTS (17) (a) Receive and file Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on May 22, 1996. (b) Verbal Report by Chair of Steering Committee re June 26, 1996 meeting. (18) (a) Verbal Report by Chair of Operations, Maintenance, and Technical Services Committee re June 5, 1996 meeting. (b) Receive and file draft Operations, Maintenance, and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on June 5, 1996. (Minutes to be mailed under separate cover.) (c) Consideration of Resolution No. 96-55, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Purchase of Natural Gas, Specification No. P-170, to Pan Energy Trading and Market Services, Inc., for the discount price of$.022/MMBTU, for a two-year period beginning August 1, 1996, with provision for two one-year or one two-year renewal(s) (Estimated annual cost $660,700.00 plus transportation costs of $248,300.00 for total annual cost of$909,000.00) (OMTS96-013). (d) Consideration of Resolution No. 96-56, approving Lease/Purchase Agreement with Scientific Utilization, Inc., to acquire Sludge Arc Treatment System (Specification No. P-171) for performance testing of sludge destruction and methane gas production, for a total amount not to exceed $360,000.00 plus sales tax, for a five-year period (annual cost not to exceed $72,000.00 plus sales tax), and authorizing Districts' termination of the agreement at any time without penalty (OMTS96-012). (19) Receive and file draft Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization Study Minutes for the meetings held on May 29, 1996 and June 11, 1996. (20) (a) Verbal Report by Chair of Planning, Design and Construction Committee re June 6, 1996 Meeting. (b) Receive and file draft Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on June 6, 1996. (c) Consideration of Resolution No. 96-57, approving plans and specifications for Main Sewage Pump (MSP) No. 3 Drive at Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-33-2, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids (Tentative bid date is July 23, 1996) (PDC96-20). -5- [ITEM (20) CONTINUED ON PAGE 6] 06re6/96 ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 5) (20) (d) Consideration of the following actions relative to Restoration of Old Laboratory for Human Resources Department, Job No. J-11-2 (PDC96-21): (1) Consideration of Resolution No. 96-58, approving plans and specifications for Restoration of Old Laboratory for Human Resources, Job No. J-11-2, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids (Tentative bid date is July 23, 1996). (2) Consideration of motion authorizing an amount not to exceed $55,000.00 for design, permitting, asbestos removal and termite extermination costs re said project. (21) Receive and file draft Ad Hoc Committee re Landfill Billings Minutes for the meeting held on June 11, 1996. (22) (a) Verbal Report by Chair of Finance, Administrative and Human Resources Committee re June 12, 1996 Meeting. (b) Receive and file draft Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on June 12, 1996. (c) Consideration of motion approving renewal of Districts' All-Risk Property Insurance Program for 1996-97, including earthquake, flood, personal property and business interruption coverage with: a $200 million All-Risk limit; a $30 million earthquake sub-limit, with deductibles of$25,000 for all perils except earthquake, and 5% per unit ($250,000 min.) for earthquake, for a total premium not to exceed $1.4 million (FAHR96-29). (d) Consideration of motion to receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of April 1996 (FAHR96-35). (a) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to enter into negotiations with J. D. Edwards for acquisition of new Financial Information System (Specification No. P-172) in an amount not to exceed $1,525,000.00, to be brought back to the Joint Board meeting of July 24, 1996 for approval (FAHR96-38). -6- [ITEM (22) CONTINUED ON PAGE 7] 06/26/96 ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 6) (22) (f) Consideration of Resolution No. 96-59, approving Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Kerry Consulting Group for preparation of New Financial Information System, Phase III, Selection Process for Hardware and Software; and Phase IV, Implementation and Acceptance of the Selected Hardware and Software Solutions (Specification No. P-167), providing for financial and human resources process and procedure re-engineering oversight not originally included in scope of work, for an amount not to exceed $23,567.00, increasing the total authorized compensation from an amount not to exceed $58,263.00 to an amount not to exceed $81,830.00 (FAHR96-39). (g) Consideration of roll call vote motion approving proposed 1996-97 Joint Works Budgets Funds, as follows: Fund Total Amount Joint Works Operating/Working Capital $48,700,000 Workers' Compensation Self-Insurance 275,000 Public Liability Self-Insurance 385,000 Joint Works Capital Outlay Revolving 44,895,000 (1) Individual District Budgets: (a) Verbal report of General Manager re proposed fiscal year 1996-97 budgets (b) DISTRICT 1 Roll call vole approving 1996-97 fiscal year budget in the following amounts: Operating Fund $13,226,000 Capital Facilities Fund 10,419,000 Construction Fund - 1990-92 9,712,000 TOTAL 133,357,000 (c) DISTRICT 2 Roll call vote approving 1996-97 fiscal year budget in the following amounts: Operating Fund $61,124,000 Capital Facilities Fund 61,555,500 Construction Fund - 1990-92 29,680,000 TOTAL $152,359,500 -7- [ITEM (22) CONTINUED ON PAGE 8] 06/26/96 ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 7) (22) (g) (1) (d) DISTRICT Roll call vote approving 1996-97 fiscal year budget in the following amounts: Operating Fund $83,435,000 Capital Facilities Fund 51,724,000 Construction Fund - 1990-92 29,295,000 TOTAL $164,454.000 (a) DISTRICT 5 Roll call vole approving 1996-97 fiscal year budget in the following amounts: Operating Fund $16,615,000 Capital Facilities Fund 12,888,000 Construction Fund - 1990-92 6,088,000 TOTAL $35,591,000 (f) DISTRICT 6 Roll call vote approving 1996-97 fiscal year budget in the following amounts: Operating Fund $14,526,000 Capital Facilities Fund 9,753,000 Construction Fund - 1990-92 3,384,000 TOTAL $27,663,000 (g) DISTRICT 7 Roll call vote approving 1996-97 fiscal year budget in the following amounts: Operating Fund $20,675,000 Capital Facilities Fund 15,979,000 Construction Fund - 1990-92 7,821,000 TOTAL $44,475,000 -8- [ITEM (22) CONTINUED ON PAGE 9] 06/26/96 ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 8) (22) (g) (1) (h) DISTRICT II Roll call vote approving 1996-97 fiscal year budget in the following amounts: Operating Fund $13,392,000 Capital Facilities Fund 13,479,000 Construction Fund - 1990-92 5,433,000 Bond & Interest Fund - 1958 33 000 TOTAL $32,337,000 (i) DISTRICT 13 Roll call vote approving 1996-97 fiscal year budget in the following amounts: Operating Fund $2,294,000 Capital Facilities Fund 8,656,000 Construction Fund - 1990-92 35 000 TOTAL $10,685,000 0) DISTRICT 14 Roll call vote approving 1996-97 fiscal year budget in the following amounts: Operating Fund $4,126,000 Capital Facilities Fund 9,189,000 Construction Fund - 1990-92 166,000 TOTAL $13,481,000 (23) (a) Verbal Report by Chair of Executive Committee re June 19, 1996 Meeting. (b) Receive and file draft Executive Committee Minutes for the meetings held on May 15, 1996 and June 19, 1996. (c) Consideration of the following actions relative to the LAFCO application for consolidation of the nine Districts into one District: (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file Final Consolidation Report dated June 17, 1996 prepared by the Ford-Sauvajot Management Group. -9- [ITEM (23) CONTINUED ON PAGE 101 O6/26196 ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 9) (23) (c) (2) Presentation of Staff Report (3) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to file LAFCO application for consolidation of the nine County Sanitation Districts into one County Sanitation District pursuant to California Health & Safety Code Section 4730.1. VOTE BY DISTRICT District No. Ayes Noes Abstained - 1 2 3 5 6 7 11 13 14 (24) DISTRICTS 1, 2. 3. 5. 6. 7 & 11 (ONLY) Consideration of the following resolutions selecting the annual change in California per capita personal income as the cost-of-living adjustment factor, and establishing the annual Gann Appropriations Limit for fiscal year 1996-97 for each District in accordance with the provisions of Division 9 of Title 1 of the California Government Code: DISTRICT RESOLUTION NO. LIMITATION 1 96-60-1 $2,884,000 2 96-61-2 11,079,000 3 96-62-3 15,289,000 5 96-63-5 2,732,000 6 96-64-6 1,770,000 7 96-65-7 5,217,000 11 96-66-11 3,300,000 -10- 06/26/96 ALL DISTRICTS (25) Consideration of the following actions relative to proposed ordinances increasing sewer connection charges (FAHR96-25): (a) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of the following actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 130, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Amending Section 702 of Ordinance No. 119 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations Relating to Increased Capital Facilities Connection Charges: (1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 130 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). (2) Consideration of motion adopting Ordinance No. 130. (b) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of the following actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 222, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, Amending Section 702 of Ordinance No. 214 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations Relating to Increased Capital Facilities Connection Charges: (1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 222 by title only, and waive reading of said entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). (3) Consideration of motion adopting Ordinance No. 222. (c) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of the following actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 325, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, Amending Section 702 of Ordinance No. 317 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations Relating to Increased Capital Facilities Connection Charges: (1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 325 by title only, and waive reading of said entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). (2) Consideration of motion adopting Ordinance No. 325. -11- [ITEM (25) CONTINUED ON PAGE 12] 06/26196 (25) (d) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of the following actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 534, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Amending Section 702 of Ordinance No. 526 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations Relating to Increased Capital Facilities Connection Charges: (1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 534 by title only, and waive reading of said entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). (2) Consideration of motion adopting Ordinance No. 534. (a) DISTRICT6 Consideration of the following actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 628, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Amending Section 702 of Ordinance No. 620 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations Relating to Increased Capital Facilities Connection Charges: (1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 628 by title only, and waive reading of said entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). (2) Consideration of motion adopting Ordinance No. 628. (f) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of the following actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 735, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, Amending Section 702 of Ordinance No. 727 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations Relating to Increased Capital Facilities Connection Charges: (1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 735 by title only, and waive reading of said entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). (2) Consideration of motion adopting Ordinance No. 735. _12_ [ITEM (25) CONTINUED ON PAGE 13] 1t6126196 (25) (g) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of the following actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 1124, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, Amending Section 702 of Ordinance No. 1116 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations Relating to Increased Capital Facilities Connection Charges: (1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 1124 by title only, and waive reading of said entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). (2) Consideration of motion adopting Ordinance No. 1124. (h) DISTRICT 13 Consideration of the following actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 1318, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, Amending Section 702 of Ordinance No. 1311 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations Relating to Increased Capital Facilities Connection Charges: (1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 1318 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). (2) Consideration of motion adopting Ordinance No. 1318. ALL DISTRICTS (26) — -----.--.----- - ----I I CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on [ this agenda as a regular meeting of the Boards,the Chair may convene the i I Boards in closed session to consider matters of pending real estate I negotiations,pending or potential litigation,or personnel matters,pursuant to i Government Code Sections 54956.8,54956.9.54957 or 54957.6,as noted. I Reports relating to(a)purchase and sale of real property;(b)matters of pending or potential litigation;(c) employment actions or negotiations with employee representatives;or which are exempt from public disclosure under I the California Public Records Act,may be reviewed by the Boards during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as final actions are taken by the Boards on any of these subjects,the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. i (a) Convene in closed session, if necessary -13- [ITEM (26) CONTINUED ON PAGE 14] 06/26/96 ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 13) (26) (b) (1) Confer with General Counsel re status of litigation, Patterson v. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court Case Nos. 73B179, 738622 and 741371 (Government Code Section 54956.9[a]). (2) Confer with General Counsel re new claim of Patterson, et al. (Government Code Section 54956.9[b][1]), (3) Confer with General Counsel re status of litigation, Louis Sangermano v. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 732680 (Government Code Section 54956.9[a]). (4) Confer with General Counsel re claim of Larry and Donna Anderson, Claim No. 5-CSD-96-L-4.5, for property damage re Bay Bridge Pump Station sewage spill (Government Code Section 54956.9[b][1]). (5) Confer with Districts' representatives (General Manager,Assistant General Managers of Administration and Operations,and Director of Human Resources) concerning status of negotiations with employee group representatives on salaries, benefits and terms of employment (Government Code Section 54957.6). (a) Confidential Employees (6) Confer with General Counsel re status of litigation appeal, Sebastiano Serrantino v. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 737044 (Government Code Section 54956.9[a]). (7) Confer with General Counsel re Landfill Billings on claim of Saybrook Capital and Price/Waterhouse for professional services fees re landfill acquisition (Government Code Section 54956.9[b][1]). (8) (DISTRICT NO. 2) Confer with General Counsel re Appeal of Administrative Complaint filed against Porter Plating, Inc. and Jerry Porter (Government Code Section 54956.9[b][1]). (9) (DISTRICT NO. 3) Confer with General Counsel re status of litigation, County Sanitation District No. 3 v. United Technologies Corporation, at al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 722816 (Government Code Section 54956.9[a]). (c) Reconvene in regular session (d) Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session -14- O6126/96 ALL DISTRICTS (27) Matters which a Director would like staff to report on at a subsequent meeting (28) Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff report (29) DISTRICT 1 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (30) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn (31) DISTRICT2 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (32) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn (33) DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (34) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn (35) DISTRICT 5 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (36) DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to adjourn (37) DISTRICT6 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (38) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn (39) DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (40) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn -15- O6/26/96 (41) DISTRICT11 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (42) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn (43) DISTRICT 13 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (44) DISTRICT 13 Consideration of motion to adjourn (45) DISTRICT 14 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (46) DISTRICT 14 Consideration of motion to adjourn NOTICE TO DIRECTORS: To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Joint i Boards, Directors shall submit items to the Board Secretary not later than the dose of business i 14 days preceding the Joint Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on the agenda i all items submitted by Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and all formal i communications. i Board Secretary: Penny Kyle (714) 962-2411, ext. 2026 i Secretary: Patricia L. Jonk (714) 962-2411, ext. 2029 Secretary: Janet L. Gray (714) 962-2411, ext. 2027 -16- JAWPDOCwAG%WN%MA6 WPD r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1 , 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 , 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES JOINT BOARD MEETING MAY 22, 1996 tPf CTS OF p99y c � z z � J a wvv •��FpT/NTHE �V\POP�O ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 • ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,2,3,5,6,7, 11,13,and 14 of Orange County,California,was held on May 22,1996,at 7:30 p.m.,In the Districts'Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1,2, 3,5,6,7, 11, 13,and 14 as follows: ACTIVE ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO.1: x Pat McGuigan,Chair Ted R. Moreno x James M.Ferryman,Chair pro tam _ Arthur Perry a Mark Murphy _ Joanne Coontz x Thomas R.Saltardi Jim Potts x Roger Stanton Wltlam G.Steiner DISTRICT NO.2: x_ John Collins,Chair George Scott Daniel T.Welch,Chair pro tam x John M.Gullb®on _ILL Barry Denes Bob Bell 3_ Burnie Dunlap _ Glenn Parker x Norman Z.Eckenrode Carol Downey a James H.Flora Stave Anderson _x Pat McGuigan Ted R.Moreno a Mark A Murphy Joanne Coontz x Chris Norby Don Bankheed __X _ Sheldon Singer George L Zlaket • Roger Stanton Wiliam G.Steiner �•L_ Bob Zemel Tom Day DISTRICT NO.3: x _ Sal A Sapien,Chair Harry M.Dotson • Sheldon Singer,Chair pro tam _ George L 73aket • Wafter Bowman _ Gail Kerry •_ George Brown _ Marilyn Bmce Hastings _• John Collins _ George Scott • Burnie Dunlap _ Glenn Parker • _ James H.Flora Steve Anderson �•L_ Don R.Griffin Patsy Marshall Victor Leipzig Ralph Bauer •_ Wally Linn Eve G.Miner • Pat McGuigan Ted R. Moreno g Chris Norby Don Bankhead • _ Margie L.Rice James V.Evan �•L_ Roger Stanton William G. Steiner • _ Chad"Sylvia Robert Wahatmm 1L_ Bob Zemel Tom Day DISTRICT NO.6: x Jan Debay,Chair John C.Cox Jr. William G.Steiner,Chair pro tam x Roger Stanton • John C.Cox,Jr. _ Jan Debay DISTRICT NO.6: x James M.Ferryman,Chair _ Arthur Perry • Jan Debay,Chair pro tam _ John C.Cox,Jr. William G.Steiner x Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO.7: x Barry Hammond,Chair _ Mike Ward __X_ Thomas R.Satiarelli,Chair pro tam _ Jim Potts _ x Jan Debay John C. Cox,Jr. _x James M.Ferryman _ Arthur Perry _x Pat McGuigan Ted R. Moreno a Mark A Murphy _ Joanne Coontz William G.Steiner _x Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO.11: , x Victor Leipzig,Chair Ralph Bauer _ILL Shiley Dettloff,Chair pro tam _ Ralph Bauer _L_ Roger Stanton _ William G.Steiner DISTRICT NO.13: _3_ John M. Gutlason,Chair Daniel T.Welch x Bob Zemel,Chair pro tam _ Tom Day Burnie Dunlap _ Glenn Parker a _ Mark A Murphy Joanne Coontz William G.Steiner x Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO.14: _y_ Thomas R.Saltarelli,Chair Jim Potts __a _ Mark A Murphy,Chair pro tam Joanne Coontz x Barry Hammond Mike Ward William G.Steiner . x Roger Stanton _v Peer A Swan Darryl Miller _2_ County Sanitation Districts of Orange County " o Minutes 5122/96 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager, Judith A. Wilson, Assistant General Manager-Administration, Penny Kyle, Board Secretary, Mike Broyles, John Dettle, John Finias, Michelle Fitzgerald, Janet Gray, Irvin Haydock, Ed Hodges, Patricia Jonk, John Linder, David Ludwin, Greg Mathews, Mike Moore, Bob Ooten, Mike Peterman, Ellen Ray, Gary Streed, Michelle Tuchman, Nancy Wheatley, Paula Zeller OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Terry Andrus, Assistant General Counsel, Richard A. Brown, David L. Hamilton, Bill Knopf, Mark Reid DISTRICTS 1. 7 & 14 Receive, file, and accept resignation of Mayor Worley of the City of Tustin and seating first and second alternates to the Mayor Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the letter from Mayor Worley of the City of Tustin resigning from the Boards of Directors of District Nos. 1, 7 and 14, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the following first and second alternates to the mayor be seated as members of the Boards: District Active Director Alternate Director 1.7 & 14 Thomas R. Saltarelli Jim Potts DISTRICT 1 Annual election of Chair and Chair pro tem of the Board This being the annual meeting at which elections are to be held for Chair and Chair pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chair and Chair pro tern of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1. -3- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 5/22/96 It was then moved: That Director Pat McGuigan be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chair. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director McGuigan as Chair. It was further moved: That Director James M. Ferryman be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chair pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Ferryman as Chair pro tem. DISTRICT 2 Annual election of Chair and Chair pro tem of the Board This being the annual meeting at which elections are to be held for Chair and Chair pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chair and Chair pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2. It was then moved: That Director John Collins be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chair. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Collins as Chair. It was further moved: That Director Daniel T. Welch be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chair pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Welch as Chair pro tem. DISTRICT 3 Annual election of Chair and Chair pro tem of the Board This being the annual meeting at which elections are to be held for Chair and Chair pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chair and Chair pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3. It was then moved: That Director Sal A Sapien be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chair. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Sapien as Chair. 4- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County v Minutes 5/22/96 It was further moved: That Directors Sheldon S. Singer and Burnie Dunlap be nominated as candidates for the office of Chair pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Singer as Chair pro tem. DISTRICT 5 Annual election of Chair and Chair pro tem of the Board This being the annual meeting at which elections are to be held for Chair and Chair pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chair and Chair pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5. It was then moved: That Director Jan Debay be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chair. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Debay as Chair. It was further moved: That Director William G. Steiner be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chair pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Steiner as Chair pro tem. DISTRICT 6 Annual election of Chair and Chair pro tem of the Board Moved, seconded, and duly carried: This being the annual meeting at which elections are to be held for Chair and Chair pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chair and Chair pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6. It was then moved: That Director James M. Ferryman be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chair. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Ferryman as Chair. It was further moved: That Director Jan Debay be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chair pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Debay as Chair pro tem. -5- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 5/22/96 DISTRICT 7 Annual election of Chair and Chair pro tern of the Board Moved, seconded, and duly carried: This being the annual meeting at which elections are to be held for Chair and Chair pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chair and Chair pro tern of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7. It was then moved: That Director Barry Hammond be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chair. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Hammond as Chair. It was further moved: That Director Thomas R. Sallarelli be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chair pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vole was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Saltarelli as Chair pro tem. DISTRICT 11 Annual election of Chair and Chair pro tem of the Board Moved, seconded, and duly carried: This being the annual meeting at which elections are to be held for Chair and Chair pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chair and Chair pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11. It was then moved: That Director Victor Leipzig be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chair. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Leipzig as Chair. It was further moved: That Director Shirley Dettloff be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chair pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Dettloff as Chair pro tem. -6- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County v Minutes 5/22/96 DISTRICT 13 Annual election of Chair and Chair pro tem of the Board Moved, seconded, and duly carried: This being the annual meeting at which elections are to be held for Chair and Chair pro tern of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chair and Chair pro tern of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13. It was then moved: That Director John M. Gullixson be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chair. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Gullixson as Chair. It was further moved: That Director Bob Zama[ be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chair pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Zama[ as Chair pro tem. DISTRICT 14 Annual election of Chair and Chair pro tem of the Board Moved, seconded, and duly carried: This being the annual meeting at which elections are to be held for Chair and Chair pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chair and Chair pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14. It was then moved: That Director Thomas R. Saltarelli be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chair. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Saltarelli as Chair. It was further moved: That Director Mark A. Murphy be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chair pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Murphy as Chair pro tem. -7- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 5/22/96 ALL DISTRICTS Presentation of AMSA 1996 Research and Technology Award The Joint Chair announced that the Districts were the recipient of an AMSA 1996 Research and Technology Award. The award recognized the technical innovation related to the pilot digester projected headed by Michelle Fitzgerald, Associate Engineer, and Gregg Pamson, retired Scientist. Ms. Fitzgerald and Mr. Pamson were recognized at the meeting for their efforts. ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Joint Chair John C. Cox, Jr., Joint Chair, reported that the Pringle Bill (AB2109 re consolidation of Orange County's water and sanitation districts)would be agendized for the June 1996 meeting. He also called special attention to the changed meeting date and time for the Operations, Maintenance, and Technical Services Committee, from July 3 to July 11 immediately following the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee meeting. The Joint Chair informed Directors that Rory Nelson, Senior Operations Supervisor, had died in a scuba diving accident in Mexico, and stated that the meeting would be adjourned in Rory's memory. The following tentatively scheduled upcoming meetings were then announced as follows: Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization -Wednesday, May 29, at 5:30 p.m. Operations, Maintenance, and Technical Services Committee - Wednesday, June 5, at 5:30 p.m. Planning, Design, and Construction Committee -Thursday, June 6, at 5:30 p.m. A tentative meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee re Landfill Consultants' Billings -Tuesday, June 11, at 5:30 p.m. Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee - Wednesday, June 12, at 5:30 p.m. Executive Committee - Wednesday, June 19, at 5:30 p.m. Steering Committee - Wednesday, June 26, at 5:30 p.m. -8- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 5rM96 ALL DISTRICTS Report of General Manager Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager, recognized Nancy Wheatley, Director of Technical Services, who updated the Directors regarding the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) actions to approve the Districts' NPDES permit. The release of a tentative decision document and draft permit are anticipated in August 1996. Final action could possibly be taken at either the September or October 1996 Regional Water Quality Control Board Meeting. Ms. Wheatley then discussed meetings to be held with stakeholders regarding the strategic plan. Mr. McIntyre advised of actions taken to resolve dust complaints associated with a project where Newport Beach is building a waterline over to Fountain Valley and staging at Plant 2. ALL DISTRICTS Report of General Counsel Tom Woodruff, General Counsel, spoke regarding a Federal legislative report on the pending congressional action on amendments to the Superfund. Mr. Woodruff also provided details of recent developments in the Montrose case. DISTRICT 1 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 24, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 24, 1996, and the adjourned meeting held May 4, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -9- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 5/22/96 DISTRICT 3 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 24, 1996, and the adjourned meeting held May 4, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 24, 1996, and the adjourned meeting held May 4, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 6 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 24, 1996, and the adjourned meeting held May 4, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 7 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 24, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 11 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 24, 1996, and the adjourned meeting held May 4, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 13 Aporoval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 24, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -10- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 5/22/96 DISTRICT 14 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 24, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. ALL DISTRICTS Ratification of pavment of Joint and Individual District Claims Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That payment of Joint and Individual District claims set forth on exhibits "A" , "B", and "C", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. ALL DISTRICTS 04/17/96 05/01/96 MISC. Joint Operating Fund - $ 573,666.89 $305,327.31 $251,397.49 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 1,450,407.02 328,632.67 4,333.46 Joint Working Capital Fund - 161,155.48 279,915.93 0.00 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 53043.93 71,860.61 93,221.91 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 894.00 2,526.70 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 2,007.16 25,755.01 423.00 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 9,541.80 963,295.90 90.00 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 177.00 5,550.48 538.13 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 24,115.00 1,189.01 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 882.80 9,780.91 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 5,097.40 8,534.00 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 13 - 0.00 35.61 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 14 - 0.00 506.93 0.00 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 243,282.06 147,226.53 0.00 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 0.00 213.52 0.00 DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 0.00 16.71 0.00 S2 476,2ZQ-54 $2 15 30 67 83 $350 003.99 -11- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 5/22/96 ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file draft minutes of the Steering Committee Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the draft minutes of the Steering Committee meeting held on April 24, 1996, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Verbal report from Chair of Steering Committee re May 22, 1996 meeting Joint Chair Cox , Chair of the Steering Committee, gave a brief verbal report on the May 22, 1996 meeting. ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file draft minutes of the Operations. Maintenance. and Technical Services Committee Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the draft minutes of the Operations, Maintenance, and Technical Services Committee meeting held on May 1, 1996, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Verbal report from Chair of Operations. Maintenance, and Technical Services Committee re May 1. 1996 meeting Director Pat McGuigan, Chair of the Operations, Maintenance, and Technical Services Committee, gave a brief verbal report on the items being recommended for approval. _12_ County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 5/22/96 ALL DISTRICTS Approving Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement with SAIC re Specification No. P-156R (OMTS95-033b) Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Operations. Maintenance and Technical Services Committee certification of the negotiated fee relative to Amendment No. 1 to agreement with SAIC for Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for Districts' 120-inch Ocean Outfall, Specification No. P-156R, providing for an extension of the contract from July 1, 1996 through June 30, 1997, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed, and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 96-51, approving Amendment No. 1 to said agreement with SAIC for Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for Districts' 120-inch Ocean Outfall, Specification No. P-156R, extending the contract from July 1, 1996 through June 30, 1997, for an amount not to exceed $1,474,098 for said time period. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Approving Billing Agreement with Southern California Gas Company (OMTS95-041 D) Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Billing Agreement with Southern California Gas Company as Districts' agent to facilitate billing for amounts due to Districts for compressed natural gas dispensed from Districts' refueling station, at a cost of$.20 per transaction, cancelable on ten days written notice, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file draft minutes of the Planning. Design and Construction Committee Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the draft minutes of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee meeting held on May 2, 1996, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. -13- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 5/22/96 ALL DISTRICTS Verbal report from Chair of Planning. Design. and Construction Committee re May 2. 1996 meeting Director John Collins, Chair of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee, gave a brief verbal report on the items being recommended for approval. ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing the General Manager to issue a purchase order to ADS Environmental Services. Inc. (PDC96-18) Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to issue a purchase order to ADS Environmental Services, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $131,300.00 for Dry Weather and Wet Weather Flow Monitoring Services. ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file draft minutes of the Finance. Administration. and Human Resources Committee Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the draft minutes of the Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee meeting held on May 8, 1996, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Verbal report from Chair of Finance. Administration. and Human Resources Committee re May 8. 1996 meeting Director George Brown, Chair of the Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee, gave a brief verbal report on the items being recommended for approval. -14- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 5/22/96 ALL DISTRICTS Approving revisions to Management Performance Review Plan (MPRP) Performance Incentive Values (FAHR96-26) The General Manager reported that training for preparing objective performance appraisals was being conducted. In addition, a central clearing process was made a part of the system to ensure objectivity among divisions and departments. Mr. McIntyre welcomed the attendance of Directors at a training session and encouraged them to review training materials if that would further their understanding of the MPRP process. Judy Wilson, Assistant General Manager-Administration, commented that appraisals would evaluate the attainment of goals and objectives through measurable standards which had been mutually agreed upon by both supervisor and employee prior to the fiscal year. It was then moved, seconded, and duly carried: That a Target Merit Pool Fund of 2.0% of payroll for implementation in July 1997, as a non-base building bonus for performance that exceeds expectations or is outstanding, be, and is hereby, established; and, FURTHER MOVED: That provision be, and is hereby, made for market adjustment not to exceed 2.0% of payroll or CPI for Los Angeles-Anaheim- Riverside, whichever is lower. Directors John M. Gullixson and Barry Hammond requested that their opposition to the motion be made a matter of record. ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR96-27) Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of March 1996 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Treasurer's Report for the month of March 1996, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. -15- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 5/22/96 ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing staff to obtain Comprehensive General Liability and Excess Liability Insurance with California Municipal Excess Liability (CAMEL) Program (FAHR96-311 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to obtain Comprehensive General Liability and Excess Liability Insurance for the period July 1, 1996 to July 1, 1997, with the California Municipal Excess Liability (CAMEL) Program in an amount not to exceed $125,000.00. ALL DISTRICTS Approving Change Order No. 2 to Purchase Order No. 74798 issued to Clements Environmental (FAHR96-33) The General Manager advised that a change order to the scope of work was necessary in order to thoroughly assess the County of Orange's 21 closed landfill sites for due diligence purposes. It was then moved, seconded, and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue Change Order No. 2 to Purchase Order No. 74798 issued to Clements Environmental in connection with the County Landfill Acquisition, providing for additional technical review of the County's closed landfill sites and solid waste industry analysis, in the amount of $69,945.28, increasing the total authorized amount from an amount not to exceed $100,000.00 to an amount not to exceed $169,945.28. Directors John M. Gullixson, Barry Hammond, Chris Norby, and Bob Zemel requested that their opposition to the motion be made a matter of record. ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file Third Quarter Financial and Operations Report (FAHR96-34) Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Third Quarter Financial and Operations Report dated March 31, 1996, be, and is hereby, received and filed. -16- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 5/22/96 ALL DISTRICTS Actions re Bay Bridge Pump Station Sewaae Spill of February 22, 1996 Verbal staff report Nancy Wheatley, Director of Technical Services, reported that the Regional Water Quality Control Board had recommended a penalty assessment in the amount of$50,000.00 against the Districts relative to the spill from the Bay Bridge Pump Station on February 22, 1996. A public hearing will be held on May 31, 1996, to provide the public an opportunity to comment on the spill. At this public hearing, staff will be proposing that the penalty amount be applied towards funding of temporary and potentially long-term solutions to the situation at Bolsa Chica State Park. Don McIntyre, General Manager, commented that imposition of the penalty was related to Districts' response time to the spill incident. Receive and file Staff Report Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Staff Report dated May 15, 1996, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Receive and file Administrative Civil Liability Complaint No. 96-3 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Administrative Civil Liability Complaint No. 96-3 issued by California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region, relative to the Bay Bridge Pump Station Sewage Spill on February 22, 1996, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the staff recommendation to accept the penalty and waive any appeals be approved. Directors Walter Bowman and Sal A Sapien requested that their opposition to the motion be made a matter of record. -17- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 5122/96 ALL DISTRICTS Actions re first reading and introduction of proposed ordinances Increasing Sewer Connection Charges (FAHR96-25) Verbal Report General Counsel presented a brief verbal report on the proposed ordinances. He noted that the increase, based on the change in the Engineering News Record, is the first change in four years and is a minimal amount. Adoption of the ordinances would occur at the next regularly scheduled Joint Boards meeting, with ordinances taking effect 60 days thereafter. Receive and file Staff Report dated April 10, 1996 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Staff Report dated April 10, 1996 re proposed Ordinances Increasing Sewer Connection Charges, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 1 Action re first reading and introduction of proposed Ordinance No. 130 Making finding that adoption of Ordinance No. 130 is statutorily exempt per CEQA Guidelines Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 130, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Amending Section 702 of Ordinance No. 119 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations Relating to Increased Capital Facilities Connection Charges, is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and Public Resources Code 21080(b)(8) in that the Ordinance is a regulatory action taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment; and the increased revenues to be received -18- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 5/22/96 by the connection charges will be used to reimburse the District for capital projects which have been, and will be, constructed and which are necessary to maintain service within the existing defined service areas of the District, as set forth in the comprehensive Master Plan. First reading of proposed Ordinance No. 130 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That proposed Ordinance No. 130, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Amending Section 702 of Ordinance No. 119 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations Relating to Increased Capital Facilities Connection Charges, be read by title only and that reading of said ordinance in its entirety be waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 130 by title only, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 130, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California. Amending Section 702 of Ordinance No. 119 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations Relating to Increased Capital Facilities Connection Charges, be introduced and passed to seconding reading and hearing on June 26, 1996, at the Districts' Administrative Office. DISTRICT 2 Action re first reading and introduction of Proposed Ordinance No. 222 Making finding that adoption of Ordinance No. 222 is statutorily exempt per CEQA Guidelines Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 222, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, Amending Section 702 of Ordinance No. 214 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations Relating to Increased Capital Facilities Connection Charges, is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and Public Resources Code 21080(b)(8) in -19- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 5/22/96 that the Ordinance is a regulatory action taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment; and the increased revenues to be received by the connection charges will be used to reimburse the District for capital projects which have been, and will be, constructed and which are necessary to maintain service within the existing defined service areas of the District, as set forth in the comprehensive Master Plan. First reading of proposed Ordinance No. 222 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That proposed Ordinance No. 222, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, Amending Section 702 of Ordinance No. 214 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations Relating to Increased Capital Facilities Connection Charges, be read by title only and that reading of said ordinance in its entirety be waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 222 by title only, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 222, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, Amending Section 702 of Ordinance No. 214 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations Relating to Increased Capital Facilities Connection Charges, be introduced and passed to seconding reading and hearing on June 26, 1996, at the Districts' Administrative Office. DISTRICT 3 Action re first reading and introduction of proposed Ordinance No. 325 Making finding that adoption of Ordinance No. 325 is statutorily exempt per CEQA Guidelines Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 325, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Amending Section 702 of Ordinance No. 317 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations Relating to Increased Capital Facilities Connection Charges, is statutorily -20- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 5/22/96 exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and Public Resources Code 21080(b)(8) in that the Ordinance is a regulatory action taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment; and the increased revenues to be received by the connection charges will be used to reimburse the District for capital projects which have been, and will be, constructed and which are necessary to maintain service within the existing defined service areas of the District, as set forth in the comprehensive Master Plan. First reading of proposed Ordinance No. 325 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That proposed Ordinance No. 325, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, Amending Section 702 of Ordinance No. 317 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations Relating to Increased Capital Facilities Connection Charges, be read by title only and that reading of said ordinance in its entirety be waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 325 by title only, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 325, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, Amending Section 702 of Ordinance No. 317 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations Relating to Increased Capital Facilities Connection Charges, be introduced and passed to seconding reading and hearing on June 26, 1996, at the Districts' Administrative Office. -21- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 5/22/96 DISTRICT 5 Action re first reading and introduction of Proposed Ordinance No. 534 Making finding that adoption of Ordinance No. 534 is statutorily exempt per CEQA Guidelines Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 534, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Amending Section 702 of Ordinance No. 526 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations Relating to Increased Capital Facilities Connection Charges, is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and Public Resources Code 21080(b)(8) in that the Ordinance is a regulatory action taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment; and the increased revenues to be received by the connection charges will be used to reimburse the District for capital projects which have been, and will be, constructed and which are necessary to maintain service within the existing defined service areas of the District, as set forth in the comprehensive Master Plan. First reading of proposed Ordinance No. 534 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That proposed Ordinance No. 534, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Amending Section 702 of Ordinance No. 526 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations Relating to Increased Capital Facilities Connection Charges, be read by title only and that reading of said ordinance in its entirety be waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 534 by title only, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 534, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Amending Section 702 of Ordinance No. 526 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations Relating to Increased Capital Facilities Connection Charges, be introduced and passed to seconding reading and hearing on June 26, 1996, at the -22- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 5/22196 Districts' Administrative Office. DISTRICT 6 Action re first reading and introduction of proposed Ordinance No. 628 Making finding that adoption of Ordinance No. 628 is statutorily exempt per CEQA Guidelines Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 628, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Amending Section 702 of Ordinance No. 620 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations Relating to Increased Capital Facilities Connection Charges, is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and Public Resources Code 21080(b)(8) in that the Ordinance is a regulatory action taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment; and the increased revenues to be received by the connection charges will be used to reimburse the District for capital projects which have been, and will be, constructed and which are necessary to maintain service within the existing defined service areas of the District, as set forth in the comprehensive Master Plan. First reading of proposed Ordinance No. 628 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That proposed Ordinance No. 628, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Amending Section 702 of Ordinance No. 620 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations Relating to Increased Capital Facilities Connection Charges, be read by title only and that reading of said ordinance in its entirety be waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 628 by title only, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried: -23- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 5/22/96 That Ordinance No. 628, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Amending Section 702 of Ordinance No. 620 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations Relating to Increased Capital Facilities Connection Charges, be introduced and passed to seconding reading and hearing on June 26, 1996, at the Districts' Administrative Office. DISTRICT 7 Action re first readina and introduction of Proposed Ordinance No. 735 Making finding that adoption of Ordinance No. 735 is statutorily exempt Per CEQA Guidelines Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 735, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, Amending Section 702 of Ordinance No. 727 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations Relating to Increased Capital Facilities Connection Charges, is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and Public Resources Code 21080(b)(8) in that the Ordinance is a regulatory action taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment; and the increased revenues to be received by the connection charges will be used to reimburse the District for capital projects which have been, and will be, constructed and which are necessary to maintain service within the existing defined service areas of the District, as set forth in the comprehensive Master Plan. First reading of proposed Ordinance No. 735 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That proposed Ordinance No. 735, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, Amending Section 702 of Ordinance No. 727 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations Relating to Increased Capital Facilities Connection Charges, be read by title only and that reading of said ordinance in its entirety be waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 735 by title only, it was moved, -24- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 5122/96 seconded, and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 735, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, Amending Section 702 of Ordinance No. 727 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations Relating to Increased Capital Facilities Connection Charges, be introduced and passed to seconding reading and hearing on June 26, 1996, at the Districts' Administrative Office. DISTRICT 11 Action re first reading and introduction of proposed Ordinance No. 1124 Making finding that adoption of Ordinance No. 1124 is statutorily exempt per CEQA Guidelines Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 1124, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, Amending Section 702 of Ordinance No. 1116 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations Relating to Increased Capital Facilities Connection Charges, is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and Public Resources Code 21080(b)(8) in that the Ordinance is a regulatory action taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment; and the increased revenues to be received by the connection charges will be used to reimburse the District for capital projects which have been, and will be, constructed and which are necessary to maintain service within the existing defined service areas of the District, as set forth in the comprehensive Master Plan. First reading of proposed Ordinance No. 1124 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That proposed Ordinance No. 1124, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, Amending Section 702 of Ordinance No. 1116 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations Relating to Increased Capital Facilities Connection Charges, be read by title only and that reading of said ordinance in its entirety be waived. -25- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 5122/96 Following the reading of Ordinance No. 1124 by title only, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 1124, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, Amending Section 702 of Ordinance No. 1116 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations Relating to Increased Capital Facilities Connection Charges, be introduced and passed to seconding reading and hearing on June 26, 1996, at the Districts' Administrative Office. DISTRICT 13 Action re first reading and introduction of Proposed Ordinance No. 1318 Making finding that adoption of Ordinance No. 1318 is statutorily exempt Per CEQA Guidelines Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 1318, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, Amending Section 702 of Ordinance No. 1311 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations Relating to Increased Capital Facilities Connection Charges, is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and Public Resources Code 21080(b)(8) in that the Ordinance is a regulatory action taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment; and the increased revenues to be received by the connection charges will be used to reimburse the District for capital projects which have been, and will be, constructed and which are necessary to maintain service within the existing defined service areas of the District, as set forth in the comprehensive Master Plan. -26- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 5/22/96 First reading of proposed Ordinance No. 1318 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That proposed Ordinance No. 1318, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, Amending Section 702 of Ordinance No. 1311 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations Relating to Increased Capital Facilities Connection Charges, be read by title only and that reading of said ordinance in its entirety be waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 13 by title only, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 1318, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, Amending Section 702 of Ordinance No. 1311 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations Relating to Increased Capital Facilities Connection Charges, be introduced and passed to seconding reading and hearing on June 26, 1996, at the Districts' Administrative Office. ALL DISTRICTS General Counsel's comments Prior to Closed Session General Counsel reported to the Directors the need for a closed session as authorized by Government Code Section 54956.9(a) to discuss and consider the items that are specified as Items 18(b)(1) and (2) on the published agenda. ALL DISTRICTS Add Item to the Closed Session Agenda Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Item No. 15(e) re amending Memoranda of Understanding with recognized employee organizations re MetraHealth medical plan, be added to the Closed Session Agenda. -27- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 6/22/96 ALL DISTRICTS Convene in Closed Session pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) The Boards convened in closed session at 8:55 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a). Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Boards of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. No action was taken re Agenda Items 1 13(b)(1) and (2). Action taken relative to Agenda Item 15(e) was reported in regular session as reported below. ALL DISTRICTS Reconvene in regular session At 9:47 p.m., the Boards reconvened in regular session. ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing the General Manager to execute an amendment to the Memoranda of Understanding with recognized employee organizations re MetraHealth Point-of-Service medical plan (FAHR96-28) John C. Cox, Jr., Joint Chair, stated that on advice from General Counsel, the recommended action would be amended to reflect that no resolution would be required. Don McIntyre, General Manager, reported that staff had included a vision benefit within the proposed package to provide improved health coverage for employees. The three unions had voiced approval of the proposed health insurance package. The proposal, however, did not receive approval at the Finance, Administration, and Human Resources (FAHR) Committee level. He advised that representatives from the three unions were present to comment on the FAHR Committee decision. Mark Reid, representing the Association of Supervisory/Professional Management Employees, spoke concerning the FAHR Committee decision. He requested that the Boards of Directors not adopt the Committee's recommendation, but rather adopt the original package proposal. -28- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 5122/96 Richard A. Brown, representing Orange County Employees Association (OCEA), requested that the recommended action not be adopted, and asked that District representatives return to the bargaining table for further discussion of the matter. David L. Hamilton, representing Local 501 Operating Engineers, commented that the action before the Boards of Directors differed from the tentative agreement agreed upon by the union. The Joint Chair commented that the vision coverage issue could still be discussed during upcoming contract negotiation sessions. After discussion among the Directors, it was requested that the item be moved to closed session for Directors to further discuss the issues surrounding this matter. General Counsel advised that under the provision of the Brown Act 54957.6, the Board was authorized to convene in Closed Session for the purpose of meeting with the management negotiating team to discuss the terms and conditions of wages, benefits, and other terms of employment. Upon returning into open session, it was then moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to execute amendments to the Memoranda of Understanding with recognized employee organizations to provide for the implementation of MetraHealth Point-of-Service medical plan effective July 1, 1996; to fund dependent medical premiums at 80% and employee only coverage at 100%; and, to convert self-funded dental insurance to fully- insured program through Delta Dental. The matter was passed on a 6-2 vote of the Districts; there was no quorum in District 13. -29- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 5/22/96 DISTRICT 1 Adiournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned in memory of Rory Nelson, Senior Operations Supervisor. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:47 p.m. DISTRICT 2 Adiournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned in memory of Rory Nelson, Senior Operations Supervisor. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:47 p.m. DISTRICT 3 Adiournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned in memory of Rory Nelson, Senior Operations Supervisor. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:47 p.m. DISTRICT 5 Adiournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned in memory of Rory Nelson, Senior Operations Supervisor. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:47 p.m. -30- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 5/2096 DISTRICT 6 Adioumment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned in memory of Rory Nelson, Senior Operations Supervisor. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:47 p.m. DISTRICT 7 Approving Agreement with the County of Orange for the adiustment of manholes on District sewers in coniunction with the County's 1995-96 street resurfacing program Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 96-53-7, approving agreement with County of Orange providing for the adjustment of manholes on District sewers in conjunction with the County's 1995-96 street resurfacing program in unincorporated County areas within District No. 7, and providing for payment of the actual cost of the manhole adjustment plus 10% for inspection and administrative costs for approximately 70 manholes, at a per-manhole unit cost not to exceed $220.00 nor be less than $155.00 per manhole. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. FURTHER MOVED: That payment of required deposit of$13,650.00 for said work, be, and is hereby, authorized. DISTRICT 7 Adioumment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned in memory of Rory Nelson, Senior Operations Supervisor. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:47 p.m. -31- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 5/22/96 DISTRICT 11 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District NO. 11 be adjourned in memory of Rory Nelson, Senior Operations Supervisor. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:47 p.m. DISTRICT 13 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned in memory of Rory Nelson, Senior Operations Supervisor. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:47 p.m. DISTRICT 14 Adiournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned in memory of Rory Nelson, Senior Operations Supervisor. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:47 p.m. Aoje' Secretary01!�61 , B ar of Directors of CountytiO stricts Nos. 1, 2, 7, 11, 13 & 14 -32- FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESS4IUDATE 4/12/96 PAGE1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/17195 POSTING DATE O4/17195 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 151202 AGU $17.50 PUBLICATION 151203 ASL CONSULTING ENGINEERS 5423.00 ATWOOD SUBTRUNK PLAN PREPARATION 151204 AT&T-MEGACOM SERVICE $2,737.02 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 151205 A T&T-CELLULAR CR&R $5.05 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 151206 A-Z LOGIC SYSTEMS $355.98 LAB SUPPLIES 151207 ABANNER IDEA $59.26 OFFICE SUPPLIES 161208 ADVANCED COOLING TECHNOLOGY $420.00 ELECTRIC PARTS 151209 AIR B WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOC. $295.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 151210 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $36,664S8 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.0.8.9-09 151211 AIR&WASTE MGMT.ASSOC. 565.44 PUBLICATION 151212 ASCE CONTINUING EDUCATION $165.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING 151213 AMERICAN AIRLINES $448.40 TRAVEL SERVICES 151214 THE BOND BUYER S558.n SUBSCRIPTION 151216 AMERICAN PAYROLL ASSOC. $124.05 PUBLICATION 151216 AMERICAN SIGMA $20.528.55 TESTING SUPPLIES 151217 AMERICAN VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS $9,695.86 COMPUTER PARTS f•1 151218 AMOCO ENERGY TRADING $47,266.96 NATURAL GAS MO 6.28-95 X 151219 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION $24.067.00 SEWER REPAIRS 2 151220 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL $1.260.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT DO 151221 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $2.270.20 NOTICES&ADS 151222 APPLE ONE $5.958.92 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 151223 AQUATIC BIOASSAY&CONSULTANTS $5,905.00 LAB SERVICES n 151224 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT $2.200.74 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 1 151225 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE,INC. $310.40 TOXIC WASTE REMOVAL N 151228 ASSOCIATED CONCRETE PRODUCTS $290.93 BUILDING MATERIALS 151227 ATKINIJONES COMPUTER SERVICE $321.30 SERVICEAGREEMENT 151228 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $3,632.37 PAYROLL SERVICES 151229 AWARDS B TROPHIES $33.40 PLAQUES 15123D BKK LANDFILL $2,272.16 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.OA0.9-91 151231 E S BABCOCK&SONS INC $1.024.00 LAB ANALYSIS 151232 BANANA BLUEPRINT $1,240.98 PRINTINGM.0.11-07-94 151233 BANCROFT-WHITNEY CO.. $340.21 PUBLICATION 151234 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $378.59 BATTERIES 151235 BAUER COMPRESSOR $593.7.2 COMPRESSOR PARTS 151236 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $3.421.82 LAB SUPPLIES 151237 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $329.15 TRUCK WASH TICKETS 151238 A BIEDERMAN,INC. $918.71 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 151239 WT WLLARD $345.11 BUILDING REPAIRS 151240 BIO-GRO DIVISION $45,871.55 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M04-M95 151241 BISHOPS SANITARY $420.23 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 151242 BOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE $193.95 TRUCK REPAIRS 151243 BONA-RUES $498.88 TRUCK PARTS 151244 BOOT BARN 5380.63 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 151245 CA P $149.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 151246 C.L TECHNOLOGY $720.00 GAS ANALYSIS SERVICES 151247 CS COMPANY $7,782.49 PLUMBING SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4112J96 PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/17M POSTING DATE 04/17/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 151246 CALIF ASSOC,OF SAN.AGENCIES $130.00 WORK CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 161249 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $977.56 SERVICE AGREEMENT 151250 CALIF.DEBT ADVISORY $125.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 151251 CALIFORNIA LABORATORIES&DEV $704.00 FUME HOODS DISPOSAL 151252 CALLAN ASSOCIATES,INC. $4,978.78 INVESTMENT ADVISOR SERVICES 151253 CAMALI CORP. $2,569A1 SERVICE AGREEMENT 151254 CAPITAL ENQUIRY,INC. $165.35 PUBLICATION 151255 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $4,806.15 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-38,J-33 151255 CASA 5260.00 WORK CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 151257 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $796.31 OFFICE FURNITURE 161258 CENTURY SAFETY INST.&SUPPLY $1,635.11 SAFETY SUPPLIES 161259 CHEMWEST,INC. $96.54 PUMP PARTS 151260 KIMBERLY CHRISTENSEN $1,113.34 TRAINING EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 151251 CLEMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL $14.000.00 CONSULTANT-LANDFILL PROJECT MO 7-31-95 151282 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $220.84 SERVICE AGREEMENT IS1263 COUCH&SONS $69,283.80 CONSTRUCTION M4144 151264 COMMUNICATIONS PERFORMANCE GRP S4,000.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING m 151285 COMPUSERVE $305.39 COMPUTER SERVICES X 151266 CONNELL GM PARTS I DIV. $185.63 TRUCK PARTS ti 151267 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $2,152.83 ELECTRIC PARTS LA 161260 CONSOLIDATED PLASTICS CO. $341.97 PUMP 151269 CONSUMER PIPE $85.67 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 1$1270 CONTINENTAL EQUIPMENT&SUPPLY $66.93 TOOLS n 151271 COOK BROTHERS $437.37 VALVE N 161272 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $1,021.90 ENGINE PARTS 161273 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $359.35 TRUCK PARTS 151274 CRANE PRO SERVICES $415.09 CRANE REPAIR 151275 CSUS FOUNDATION $108.26 OPERATOR TRAINING 151278 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION $230.02 FUELTAXES 151277 DME,INC. $555.98 COMPRESSOR PARTS 151278 DAILY PILOT $222.00 NOTICES&ADS 161270 . DELL MARKETING LP. $16,189.98 COMPUTER 1512BO DEL MAR ANALYTICAL $950.00 LAB ANALYSIS 1512BI DEZURICKANDIOR CS CO. $2.025.68 VALVES 151282 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $392.51 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 151253 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $940.00 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 151204 D'VALS SALES $81.00 FITTINGS 151205 ESP NORTH $655.75 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 1512BB ENCHANTER,INC. $2,800.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5-24-95 151287 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $867.70 LAB SUPPLIES 151288 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE CENTER $399.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 151289 FLUID TECH.SALES $226.91 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 151290 F&M WELDING,INC. $6.566.12 HAND RAILS 151291 FMC CORPORATION $41.054.34 HYDROGEN PEROXIDE MO 9.14-94 151292 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $4,181.25 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O. 10-9-91 151293 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $33.25 AIR FREIGHT FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4H2/88 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/17/95 POSTING DATE 04/17/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 151294 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $181-11 FILTERS 151295 FIRST CHOICE $2.981.34 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT 151296 FORMA SCIENTIFIC,INC. $9,203.25 LAB SUPPLIES 151297 CLIFFORD A FORKERT $1.812.60 SURVEYING SERVICES MO 68-95 151298 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $309.72 PHOTO SUPPLIES 151299 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY 511,1D1.80 WATER USE 15130D FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $225.74 PAINT SUPPLIES 161301 FRANKLIN ELECTRONIC PUBLISHERS $123.83 PUBLICATIONS 151302 CITY OF FULLERTON $116.16 WATER USE 1513M EST,INC. $12,255.50 OFFICE SUPPLIES 151304 GTE TELEPHONE OPERATIONS 12,194.29 TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT 151305 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $3.353.83 CHEMICALS 151305 GE IND 8 POWER SYSTEMS $3,699.60 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 151307 GENERAL PETROLEUM 29,042.88 GASOLINE 151308 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1.051.39 TELEPHONE SERVICES 161309 GIERLICH4AITCHELL,INC. $2,055.94 PUMP PARTS 151310 GRASBY S.T.I. $1.169.29 ENGINE PARTS M 151311 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $201.09 PRINTING = 151312 DGA CONSULTANTS $6.340.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.64L90 151313 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $96.32 TRUCK PARTS W 151314 HARBOUR ENGINEERING $5,191.30 MECHANICAL PARTS 151315 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $129.15 PLUMBING SUPPLIES IS016 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS $2,190.00 CONTAINER RENTALS D 151317 PL HAWN CO,INC. $6.245.19 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES W 151318 HELLO $218.95 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 151319 HELPMATES PERSONNEL SERVICES 27,634.01 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 151320 HILTI,INC. 56,18588 TOOLS 151321 HOME DEPOT $640.64 SMALL HARDWARE 151322 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $256.66 PAINT SUPPLIES 151323 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $22,323.24 WATER USE 151324 HUNTINGTON AMC/JEEP/RENAULT $178.60 AUTO PARTS 151325 IAML $1,675.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING 151325 IDM CONTROLS,INC. $538.13 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 151327 IPCO SAFETY $B69.33 SAFETY SUPPLIES 151328 IMAGING PLUS $550.46 OFFICE SUPPLIES 151329 INDUSTRIAL FILTER MFG. $2,400.00 FILTER 151330 INDUSTRIAL STEAM 21,377.2D PUMP 151331 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $1.334.42 CONNECTORS 151332 ISI INFORTE%T $770.42 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 161333 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. $75.56 TRUCK PARTS 161334 INNOVATION GROUP WEST $590.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING 151335 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $1,131.45 BATTERIES 151338 IRVINE PHOTO GRAPHICS $13.67 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 151337 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT 570.44 WATER USE 151338 J2 PRINTING SERVICES 2388.28 PRINTING 151339 JH RECOGNITION CO. $853.17 SERVICE AWARDS FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 4112M PAGE4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/17/95 POSTING DATE 04/17/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 151340 JAMISON ENGINEERING $2,000.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 151341 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $279.48 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 151342 JAYS CATERING $597.34 DIRECTORS MEETING EXPENSE 151343 KALLEEN'S COMPUTER PRODUCTS $143.67 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 151344 KEMIRON PACIFIC,INC. $170,320.60 FERRIC CHLORIDE MO 9.27-96 151345 KING BEARING,INC. E469.27 MACHINE SUPPLIES 151346 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $2.055.05 TOOLS 161347 PENNY KYLE E22D.D6 TRAINING EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 151346 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $1,232.87 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICE 151349 LAMOTTE COMPANY E81.97 SULFIDE TEST KIT 151350 LAW/CRANDAL,INC. $1,530.00 SOIL TESTING 7-13-94 151351 ORANGE COUNTY DIVISION $30.75 PUBLICATION 151352 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES $95.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING 151353 LIKE NU TILE E280.00 RESTROOM TILE REPAIR 151354 MEC ANALYTICAL $1.108.00 LAB ANALYSIS 151355 R.F.MACDONALD CO. $29.45 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 151356 MANDIC MOTORS E45.00 TOWING SERVICES m 151357 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $1.259,733.50 CONSTRUCTION P7-36-2 X 161358 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $195.42 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES S 151359 MIKE MCCARTMY BUICN,INC. E17,220.76 NEW TRUCK IS1360 DONALD F.MCINTYRE $216.93 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT --I 161351 MIDWAY MFG.S MACHINING $375.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS n 151362 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3,998.81 UNIFORM RENTALS 1 151363 MONITOR LABS $120.78 INSTRUMENT r 151364 MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE $7,500.00 COP RATING MAINTENANCE FEES 151365 MORGAN COMPANY $520.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 151366 MORTON SALT E51636 SALT 151367 SAM MOWBRAY $1,053.42 TRAINING EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 151368 THE NEWS $76.00 SUBSCRIPTION 151369 NICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY $2,935.65 LUBRICANTS/DIESEL FUEL 151370 NORTEL PRODUCT TRAINING $2,660.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 151371 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $1,212.77 SAFETY GLASSES 151372 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $13,217.27 OFFICE SUPPLIES 161373 OLSTEN STAFFING SERVICES $3.584.00 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 151374 ROBERTJ.00TEN $165.D0 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 151375 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL 12.707.44 CHEMICALS 151376 ORANGE COUNTY PUMP CO. $4,948.76 PUMPS 161377 ORANGE COURIER $182.95 COURIER SERVICES 151378 ORANGE VALVE S FITTING CO. E339.27 FITTINGS 151379 OXYGEN SERVICE $1,746.70 SPECIALTY GASES 151380 COUNTY OF ORANGE E90.00 AUDIT CONT.PROCESSING FEE 151381 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $5,743.98 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP 151382 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT $37,753.80 GAP WATER USE M.O.6-9.93 151383 PC SERVICE SOURCE $114.00 PRINTER PARTS 1513S4 PACIFIC PARTS $6.960.10 INSTRUMENT PARTS 151365 PACIFIC BELL $16.12 TELEPHONE SERVICES FUND NO 91" - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 4112/96 PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/17/95 POSTING DATE 04/17/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 161386 PADGETT - THOMPSON $346.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 151387 PARKHOUSE TIRE,INC. $392.21 TIRES 151388 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $659.25 REIMS.PETTY CASH 161389 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS $7.416.85 CONSULTING SERVICE 151390 POLYPURE,INC. $20.015.93 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92 151391 POWER SYSTEMS $236.99 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 151392 PROCESS CONTROL SYSTEMS $104.19 REPAIR 151393 PRYOR RESOURCES,INC. $99.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING 151394 PUBLIC SECTOR EXCELLENCE $3.150.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING CONSULTANT 151395 RJN GROUP,INC. $995.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 161396 R M CONTROLS $41.41 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 151397 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $2.062.75 TRASH REMOVAL 151398 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO. $241.88 LAB SUPPLIES 151399 REAL TIME SYSTEMS CDR $8,135.20 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 151400 RED WING SHOES $143.09 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 161401 BOLT DELIVERY $24.00 FREIGHT 151402 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DIST. $2,152.92 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES X 151403 RENOLD INC. $60.59 MECHANICAL PARTS = 151404 RM MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL $373.80 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 151405 RYAN-NERCO $33.46 METAL DD0 151406 JOSEPH T.RYERSON&SON,INC. $1,742.88 METAL PLATES --1 151407 SAFETYWEST $62A3 INSTRUMENT PARTS D 151401 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $1,747.36 PLUMBING SUPPLIES I 151409 SARTORIUS CORP. $255.00 LAB SUPPLIES Ln 151410 SCHWING AMERICA,INC. $1.022.70 PUMP PARTS 151411 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTL $16,120.91 OCEAN MONITORING MO 6-28-95 151412 SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS,INC. $976.70 LAS REPAIRS 151413 SEA COAST DESIGNS $309.78 LAB SUPPLIES 151414 CRY OF SEAL BEACH $643.95 WATER USE 151415 SELCO PRODUCTS CO. $357.27 METER lS14l6 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $1,199.96 TOOLS 151417 SHURELUCK SALES $8.398.48 TOOLSMARDWARE 151418 SIEMON,LARSON 8 MARSH $1,226.00 LEGAL SERVICES 151419 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $350.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 151420 THE SMITH GROUP $1,237.30 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 151421 SOUTH COAST WATER $520.00 LAB SUPPLIES 151422 SO CALIF EDISON CO $18.94 POWER 151423 SO.CAL,GAS.CO. $1,003.45 NATURAL GAS 151424 SO.CALIFORNIA MARINE INST. $800.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 151425 SPEX CHEMICAL B SAMPLE PREP $1,098.05 LABSUPPUES 151426 SRECO FLEXIBLE $6,066.33 SAFETY SUPPLIES 161427 STANDARD 8 POORS CORP $1.000.00 COP CONTRACT SERVICE 151428 SUPERB ONE-HOUR PHOTO $21.84 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES - 151429 SUPER CHEM CORP. $1,553.05 CHEMICALS 151430 SUPER ICE CORP. $80.22 LAB SUPPLIES 151431 TESTAR MVS I DIV CERPLEX $431.00 COMPUTER REPAIR FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4112M PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/17/95 POSTING DATE 04/17/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 151432 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $3.360.46 MECHANICAL PARTS 151433 TOSHIBA INTERNATIONAL $1,998.40 INSTRUMENT PARTS 151434 DANIEL TREMBLAY $1,939.98 TRAINING EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 151435 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $578.30 TRUCK PARTS 151436 JIG TUCKER B SON,INC. $2,000.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS 151437 UNISOURCEB/OR BUTLER PAPER $545.23 OFFICE SUPPLIES 151438 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $35.09 PARCEL SERVICES 151439 UNIV OF TEXAS/AUSTIN $500.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 151440 VWR SCIENTIFIC $4,810.19 LAB SUPPLIES 151441 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $63.21 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 151442 VERTEX TECHNOLOGIES,INC. $939.40 FIBER OPTICS 161443 VORTEX INDUSTRIES $925.00 BUILDING REPAIRS 151444 WACKENHUT CORP. $3,389.68 CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS 151445 WAL-CON CONSTRUCTION CO. $232,522.71 CONSTRUCTION 5-37-3 151446 CARL WARREN&CO. $5.043.93 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR 151447 WAXIE $792.77 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 151448 WESTINGHOUSE.ENERGY SER. $1,450.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING m 151449 WESTIN SANTA CLARA 5240.90 HOTEL RESERVATIONS X 151450 WEST4JTE SUPPLY CO. $1.445.91 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 2 151451 WHATMAN $792.09 LAB SUPPLIES W 151452 NANCY WHEATLEY $507.24 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT -I 151453 WHESSOE VAREC 9565.00 VALVES D 161454 JUDITH A.WILSON 577.18 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT I 151455 WITEG $411.01 LAB SUPPLIES m 151456 WOLFE AND ASSOCIATES,INC. $280.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 151457 XEROX CORP. $2,860.58 COPIER LEASES 151458 MOYASAR T.YAHYA $588.40 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT TOTAL CALIMS PAID 04/17/95 $2,476,270.54 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4112 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/17195 POSTING DATE 04117/95 SUMMARY AMOUNT 91 OPER FUND E894.00 02 OPER FUND $2,007.16 93 OPER FUND $2,451.60 93 CAP FAC FUND $7.090.00 M50PERFUND $177.00 06 OPER FUND $48.00 W6 CAP FAC FUND $24.067.00 #7 OPER FUND $442.15 97 CAP FAC FUND E440.65 611 OPER FUND $76.60 011 CAP FAC FUND $5,020 B0 9586 OPER FUND E28.59 E586 CAP FAC FUND E243,253.47 JT OPER FUND $573.668.69 CORF $1,450.407.02 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND 55,043.93 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $161.155.48 m 62,476,270.54 x x m n v FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0429M PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/01/96 POSTING DATE 05101/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 151495 ASTD PUBLISHING SERVICE $1,697.50 PUBLICATIONS 151497 ATM AA,INC. $4.905.00 LAB SERVICES 151498 ACADEMIC PRESS $21.50 PUBLICATIONS 151499 ADVANCED ENGINE TECH CORP. $15.720.85 ENGINE TESTING J-19 151500 AMERIDATA $1.073.89 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 151501 AMERICAN AIR FILTER INC. $282.78 MECHANICAL PARTS 151502 AMSA $525.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 151503 AMSA $525.D0 MANAGEMENT TRAINING 1515D4 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION $1,424.04 SEWER REPAIRS 151505 ANALYSTSINC $2.666.39 MECHANICAL PARTS 1515DB ANIXTER-DISTRIBUTION $393.56 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 151507 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $1.191.61 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 151508 AWARDS&TROPHIES $48.49 PLAQUES 161509 BKK LANDFILL $2.935.45 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9.91 151510 BANANA BLUEPRINT $3.129.45 PRINTINGM.O.11-07-94 151511 BANK OF AMERICA $20.27 BANKING SERVICES 151512 SHABBIR S. BASRAI $275.19 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT m 151513 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $96.19 BATTERIES X 151514 BAUER COMPRESSOR $127.89 COMPRESSOR PARTS 151515 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $20.00 TRUCK WASH TICKETS m 151516 BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS $85.27 LAB EQUIPMENT 151517 BERENSON COMMUNICATIONS $282.09 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 151518 BEV CUSTER $508.58 MAPS 151519 810-GRO DIVISION $41.503.91 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 4-26-95 151520 BLACK EMP.&EOU.JOURNAL $495.00 PUBLICATION 151521 BRITHINEE ELECTRIC $236.41 ELECTRIC PARTS 15152.2 BROOKS INSTRUMENT DIV. $236.62 INSTRUMENT 151523 BUDGET JANITORIAL $3,330.00 JANITORIAL SERVICES MO 112-94 151524 BUSH&ASSOCIATES,INC. $1,070.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6894 151525 C.L.TECHNOLOGY $720.00 GAS ANALYSIS SERVICES 151526 CS COMPANY $1.762.40 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 151527 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH INC. $740.29 LAB SUPPLIES 151528 CALIFORNIA AUTO COLLISION,INC. $338.17 TRUCK BODY REPAIR 151529 THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CA. $195.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING 151530 CASA $130.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING 151631 CENTURY MICRO PRODUCTS $6.989.83 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 151532 CENTURY SAFETY INST.&SUPPLY $89.77 SAFETY SUPPLIES 151533 COAST&OCEAN $18.00 SUBSCRIPTION 151534 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $300.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 151535 COLEMAN/CASKEY ARCHITECTS $42,177.30 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES M011-15.95 151536 COLOR ARTS INC $2,814.73 PRINTING SERVICES 151537 COLTON EQUIPMENT CO $402.50 CRANE INSPECTION 151538 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $7,642.60 PUMP PARTS 151539 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $3.297.71 ELECTRIC PARTS 151640 CONSOLIDATED PLASTICS CO $180.16 LAB SUPPLIES 151541 CONSOLIDATED REPROGRAPHICS $52.15 PRINTING SERVICES FUND NO 9109 • JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 04,29196 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05701796 POSTING DATE 05101M WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 151542 CONSUMER PIPE $695.33 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 151S43 CONTINENTAL EQUIPMENT&SUPPLY $177.81 TOOLS 1515" CONTROL DESIGN SUPPLY 8223A7 ELECTRIC PARTS 151545 CONTROL SPECIALISTS INC $205.72 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 151546 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $1.003.23 ENGINE PARTS 161547 COORDINATED EQUIP CO INC $125.00 CRANE CERTIFICATION 151548 COUNTERPART ENTERPRISES $829.59 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 151549 COUNTY CLERK $38.00 ANNEXATION FEE 151650 COUNTY CLERK $38.00 ANNEXATION FEE 151551 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $837.70 ELECTRIC PARTS 151552 JAMES COWAN $108.00 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 151553 CALIFORNIA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE $322.40 PUBLICATIONS 151554 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 319,584.00 UNEMPLOYMENT CHARGES 151555 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION 524.29 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK FEE 151556 DAPPER TIRE 8776.51 TIRES 151557 JAMES DARLINGTON $2.887.60 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 151558 DATASTORM $07A5 SOFTWARE m 151559 ALBERT W.DAVIES,INC. &998,404.08 CONSTRUCTION 3.36R X 151660 TOM DAWES $M7.71 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 2 � 151581 DE GUELLE&SONS GLASS CO $64.28 SAFETY GLASS 151562 DELL MARKETING L P. &77,006.96 COMPUTERS -I 151563 DEL MAR ANALYTICAL $1.410.00 BIOSOLIDS ANALYSIS Dy 151564 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIF. $57.540.31 DENTAL INSURANCE PLAN M.0.1-12-94 I 151565 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $1.790.01 OFFICE EQUIPMENT N 1515% DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $115.00 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 151567 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $662.73 PAINT SUPPLIES 151558 ESP NORTH $823.48 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 151569 ENCHANTER,INC. $3,500.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5.2495 151570 EXCALIBUR ENTERPRISES $5,279.95 NIGHT VISION VIDEO CAMERA 151571 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $2,696.25 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.1U-9-91 151572 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $307.95 AIR FREIGHT 151573 FINE SCIENCE TOOLS INC $90.27 LAB SUPPLIES 151674 FIRST CO&I OR NORTHERN DIST. $156.41 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 151575 FISONS INSTRUMENTS $241.77 SERVICE AGREEMENT 161576 FLEXFLINER CORP $11.539.44 INSPECTION&REPAIR OF DIGESTER LINING 151577 FLICKINGER CO $998.84 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 151578 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $1,403.56 PHOTO SUPPLIES 151579 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $315.50 PAINT SUPPLIES 151580 FRANCE COMPRESSOR PRODUCT $1,634.33 VALVE GUIDE 151581 FRYS ELECTRONICS $5.801.03 ELECTRONIC&COMPUTER SUPPLIES 151582 GASS $75.00 PUBLICATION 151S83 GST,INC. $8,871.38 OFFICE SUPPLIES 151684 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $630.76 LUMBERAOIRDWARE 151585 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1,211.67 TELEPHONE SERVICES 151556 GIERLIC"ITCHELL,INC. $11.510.93 PUMP PARTS 151587 WW GRAINGER.INC. $103.48 COMPRESSOR PARTS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 04MSM PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 06/01/96 POSTING DATE 05101/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 151588 GRASSY S.T.I. $1.121.75 ENGINE PARTS 151599 GRASEBY ANDERSEN $1.065.24 LAB SUPPLIES 151590 GRATING PACIFIC,INC $1,949.20 FIBERGLASS GRATING 151591 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $101.47 PRINTING 151592 DGA CONSULTANTS $4,180.00 SURVEYING SERVICES 3.36R 151593 DAVID M GRIFFITH&ASSOC. $3.209.15 LAB MANAGER RECRUITMENT 151594 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $1,024.78 TRUCK PARTS 151595 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $372.12 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 151596 HELPMATES PERSONNEL SERVICES E693.88 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 151597 HERBS BLACK FOREST BAKERY $389.00 MEETING EXPENSE 151598 HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT $2.083.33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN. 151599 HOLMES&NARVER,INC. $22,354.29 ENGINEERING SERVICES P7-04 151600 HOME DEPOT $152.34 SMALL HARDWARE 151601 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $317.61 PAINT SUPPLIES 151602 IDEXX $132.63 LAB SUPPLIES 151603 IPCO SAFETY $1,904.92 SAFETY SUPPLIES 151604 IMAGING PLUS $84.09 OFFICE SUPPLIES x 151605 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. $600.00 TRUCK PARTS = 151606 INORGANIC VENTURES $239.87 LABSUPPLIES p0 151507 INTEGRATED URBAN FORESTRY S450.00 FIELD INSPECTION&ANALYSIS ~ 151605 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $1.094.65 BATTERIES 151609 IRVINE PHOTO GRAPHICS $143.26 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES LA 151610 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $4.90 WATER USE W 151611 JAMISON ENGINEERING $2,477.14 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 151812 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $618.73 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 151613 JAYS CATERING $903.86 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE 151614 JETFORM CORP. $305.00 PUBLICATIONS 151815 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $311.43 ELECTRIC PARTS 151616 JONES HALL HILL&WHITE $8,707.76 BOND COUNSEL SERVICES M001-24.96 151617 KALLEEN'S COMPUTER PRODUCTS $1.799.97 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 151618 KEENAN SUPPLY $895.61 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 151619 KING BEARING,INC. $1,78Z58 MACHINE SUPPLIES 151620 KIRWAN COMPANY $64D80 MISCELLANEOUS HARDWARE 151621 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $2.965.64 TOOLS 151622 LAMOTTE COMPANY $76.93 SULFIDE TEST KIT 151623 LAIDLAW ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES $190.00 WASTE DISPOSAL 151624 LASHER DODGE $13.633.69 PICK-UP TRUCK 151625 LIEBERT CORPORATION $26.583.64 ELECTRIC PARTS 151628 LOCALAGENCY $3.900.00 ANNEXATION FEE 151627 LOCALAGENCY $950.00 ANNEXATION FEE 151628 CITY OF LOS ANGELES $1.60 CONNECTION FEE 151629 LUCCI'S $724.90 MEETING EXPENSE 1516W MPS $84.35 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 151631 MACOMCO $928.20 SERVICE AGREEMENT 161632 MSA $600.08 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 151633 MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY CORP. $457.26 MISCELLANEOUS HARDWARE FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0429196 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/01/96 POSTING DATE 05MIM WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 151634 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS,INC. $3,260.95 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 151635 DENISE MARTINEZ E125.36 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 151636 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $71.30 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 161637 MELLON TRUST $20,139.17 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 151630 MICRO MOTION $856.71 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 151639 MICROFLEX MEDICAL CORP $365.00 SAFETY SUPPLIES 151640 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3.182.75 UNIFORM RENTALS 151541 NAGDCA $300.00 ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP 151612 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES $1,062.50 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 151S43 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $915.01 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 1516" NEUTRON $1.845.79 ANIONIC POLYMER M.0.6-10-94 151645 NICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY $9,557.07 LUBRICANTSIDIESEL FUEL 151546 NORCAL CONTROLS,INC. $306.43 INSTRUMENT PARTS 151647 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $1.060.08 OFFICE SUPPLIES 151648 OMNI WESTERN INC $255.86 TOOLS 151649 ROBERT J OOTEN $762.81 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT Rl 151650 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $4,539.06 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES x 151651 ORANGE COURIER $141.15 COURIER SERVICES = 151652 ORANGE VALVE B FITTING CO. $746.21 FITTINGS o--� 151653 OXYGEN SERVICE $2.040.93 SPECIALTY GASES 151654 COUNTY OF ORANGE $270.00 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE - 151855 PSSI $7,097.85 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION 1A 151656 PACIFIC INVESTMENT MGMT CO $149.544.00 INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT SERVICES 1 151657 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $395.00 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 151658 PACIFIC PARTS $139.17 INSTRUMENT PARTS 151659 PACIFIC BELL $1,172.44 TELEPHONE SERVICES 151660 PADRE JANITORIAL SUPPLY $293.51 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 151661 PARAGON CABLE $35.78 CABLE SERVICES 151662 PARTS UNLIMITED $988.66 TRUCK PARTS 151663 PASCAL a LUDWIG $108,796.00 CONSTRUCTION P2-43-1 151664 PEERLESS WIPING MATERIALS $721.93 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 151655 PERMA SEAL $182.91 LUBE OIL 151566 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $745.38 ROME.PETTY CASH,TRAINING B TRAVEL 151667 WILLIAM PIERCE $572.80 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 151668 POLYMETRICS,INC. $1.262.75 LAB SUPPLIES 151669 POWER SYSTEMS $147.98 MECHANICAL PARTS 151670 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $88.00 ICE FOR SAMPLES 151671 PUMP ENGINEERING $1.000.03 PUMP PARTS 151672 PUMPING SOLUTIONS INC $564.40 PUMP PARTS 151673 PUTZMEISTER,INC. $505.56 PUMP PARTS 151674 DUICKSTART TECHNOLOGIES $3.750.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 151675 RD SYSTEMS,INC $245.00 CAMERA REPAIR 151676 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS S308.65 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS 151677 R 8 R INSTRUMENTS $385.82 ELECTRIC PARTS 161678 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO. $903.91 LAB SUPPLIES 151679 RED WING SHOES $277.29 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0429/96 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/01/96 POSTING DATE 05/01/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 151680 BOLT DELIVERY $72.00 FREIGHT 151681 RENOLD INC. $741.73 MECHANICAL PARTS 151682 RONAN ENGINEERING CO $142.60 ALARM PANEL RELAY 151683 RYAN-NERCO $30.90 METAL 151684 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $1.535.38 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 151685 SARTORIUS CORP. $85.00 LAB SUPPLIES 151686 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $167.18 SPECIALTY GASES 151687 SEA COAST DESIGNS $297.19 LAB SUPPLIES 151688 SEAL PRO INC $2,718.35 MECHANICAL PARTS 1516B9 SEARS ROEBUCK 8 CO $124.27 TOOLS 151690 SENTIENT SYSTEMS,INC. $2.882.66 FACILITATOR SERVICES 151691 SEWER EQUIP CO OF AMERICA $1.201.48 LEADER HOSE 151692 SHAMROCKSUPPLY $302.70 TOOLS 151693 SHURELUCK SALES $4.188.63 TOOLSMAROWARE 151694 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $962.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 151695 SMITH-EMERY CO. $162.00 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-13-94 151698 SMITH PIPE B SUPPLY $155.12 PLUMBING SUPPLIES rn 151697 SNAP ON I SUN CORP $964.43 TOOLS X 151698 SO CALIF EDISON CO $27,680.91 POWER ,=y 151699 SO.CAL GAS.CO. $8.853.99 NATURAL GAS CO 151700 SPARLING INSTRUMENT CO.,INC. $250.DD METER 151701 SQUARE D I CRISP AUTOMATION SYSTEMS $2,834.00 ELECTRICAL REPAIR 151702 STANDARD SUPP B EQUIP CO $37.03 MECHANICAL PARTS DO 151703 STATE BOARD OF EQUALVA710N $250.00 ANNEXATION FEE v1 151704 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION $250.00 ANNEXATION FEE 151705 KEITH D STOLZENBACH $1.650.00 CONSULTING SERVICES 151708 SUMMIT STEEL $955.98 METAL 151707 SUNSETFORD $346.01 TRUCK PARTS 151708 SUPELCO,INC. $146.65 LAB SUPPLIES 151709 SUPER CHEM CORP. $2,238.41 CHEMICALS 151710 SUPER POWER PRODUCTS $517.20 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 151711 SUPREX CORP. 82,500.00 RENTAL AGREEMENT 161712 SYMCAS $7.647.50 CONSULTING SERVICES 151713 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG,COMPANY $989.46 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 161714 TENNANT CO $168.03 AUTO PARTS 151715 TEXAS COMMERCE BANK $10,472.47 COP TRUSTEE SERVICES 151710 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $597.00 MECHANICAL PARTS 151717 TONER SYSTEM INTERNATIONAL $1.290.85 PRINTER SUPPLIES 151718 TRAFFIC CONTROL ENGINEERING 81,400.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS 151719 TRENCH SHORING COMPANY $17,509.38 STEELPLATES 161720 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $81.64 TRUCK PARTS 151721 JG TUCKER B SON,INC. 81,830.70 INSTRUMENTPARTS 151722 U.S.AUTO GLASS CENTERS $200.62 TRUCK PARTS 151723 UNIS0URCEIVOR BUTLER PAPER $96.33 OFFICE SUPPLIES 151724 DATAVAULT/US SAFE DEPOSIT CO $94.00 BACK-UP TAPE STORAGE 151725 VWR SCIENTIFIC $5,379.53 LAB SUPPLIES FUNDHO 9190 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 0429M PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05101/96 POSTING DATE O51DIMS WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 151726 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $B32.16 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 151727 VALVATE ASSOCIATES $491.77 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 161728 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS $2,050.40 FREIGHT 151729 VERTEX TECHNOLOGIES,INC. $1.743.07 FIBER OPTICS 161730 VERTEX SYSTEMS $2,507.50 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT 151731 VORTEX INDUSTRIES $850.00 BUILDING REPAIRS 151732 WACKENHUT CORP. $6.779.36 CONTRACT SERMCESECURITY GUARDS 151733 WAL-CON CONSTRUCTION CO. $146,304.79 CONSTRUCTION P2413-1 151734 WAXIE $641.00 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 151735 WEF 6325.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING 151738 WEST COAST ANALYTICAL SRV $1,950.00 BIOSOLIDS ANALYSIS 151737 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $27,158.61 CAUSTIC SODA MO B-23-95 151738 WESTIN SANTA CLARA $240.90 MANAGEMENT TRAINING-LODGING 161739 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $262.53 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 151740 WESCO $350.19 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 151741 CITY OF WESTMINSTER $256.25 SURFACE GRADING 151742 ROURKE.WOODRUFF S SPRADLIN $87.164.62 LEGAL SERVICES MO 7.26-95 151743 GARY YOUNG(STATEWIDE INSTL) $990.00 INSTALL BIOLOGICAL HOODS IN LAB x 161744 ZYMARK CORP. $118.15 LAB EQUIPMENT 2 pD TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 05/01/96 $2,150,367.63 DU FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 04aR196 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/01/96 POSTING DATE 05/01/96 SUMMARY AMOUNT 81 OPER FUND $2.526.70 82 OPER FUND $12,876.52 82 CAP FAC FUND $12,078.49 83 OPER FUND $18.488.56 93 CAP FAC FUND $944.807.34 85 OPER FUND $5,550A8 96 OPER FUND $808.29 96 CAP FAC FUND $380.72 87 OPER FUND 89,330.91 87 CAP FAC FUND $450.00 811 OPER FUND $8,360.02 811 CAP FAC FUND $173.98 013 OPER FUND $35.61 #14 OPER FUND $384.43 014 CAP FAC FUND $122.50 #5&6 CAP FAC FUND $147,226.63 I rrI X 96&7 OPER FUND $213.52 = 07914 OPER FUND $16.71 JT OPER FUND $305,327.31 CORP $328,632.67 -1 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $71,860.61 w JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $279.916.93 V &2,150,367.83 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE-VARIOUS PAGE II REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID-MISCELLANEOUS HANDWRITE WARRANTS WARRANT DATE WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION C14111196 151195 ASCE TUL CONFERENCE $375.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING 04/11/96 151196 ALBARKER 315,540.13 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 04/11/88 161197 COUNTY CLERK $25.00 NOTICE OF EXEMPTION FEE 04H1/96 151198 ALEXFISHMAN $4.802.31 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 04H7/96 151199 PAULINE JOHNSTON AND $6.160.00 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 04/11M6 151200 JOEL MANCHESTER.M.D. $10.068.80 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 04/11/96 151201 HELENE WINCGURA $7.100.93 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 04115196 151459 APWA 385.OD TECHNICAL TRAINING 04/15/96 151460 COUNTY CLERK $38.00 NOTICE OF EXEMPTION FEE 04/15/95 151461 COUNTY CLERK $38.00 NOTICE OF EXEMPTION FEE 04/1SM6 151482 UPPER NEWPORT BAY $20.00 EARTH DAY FEE 04/19/96 151463 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $1,200.00 APPEAL FEE 04/19M 151464 KEYE PRODUCTIVITY CENTER $139.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 04/19M 151465 WATERUSE MEMBERSHIP $100.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING 0424/96 161486 DONNAANDERSON $21.95 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 0424/96 151487 HARRY CROMWELL $19.126.00 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 0424196 151488 EMERGENCY SERVICE RESTORATION $2.144.30 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM m 0424NB 151489 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT $495.00 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM X 04/24/96 151490 NEWPORT HARBOR LOCKSMITH 385.00 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM S 0424/96 151491 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS INC E129,812.86 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 3.29-95 w 0424M6 161492 WATERUSE ASSOCIATION $150.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING - 0428/98 151493. JOHN C.COX,JR. $200.45 CASA WORKSHOP C"1 04/26M 151494 SAL SAPIEN $200.45 CASA WORKSHOP 04/26/0 151495 PEER SWAN $200.45 CASA WORKSHOP 05/01/96 151745 NICHOLAS ARHONTES $543,55 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 05/01/95 151746 THE BALBOA BAY CLUB $3,376.65 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 05/01/96 151747 GASKET ENGINEERING $90.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 05MI196 151746 INNOVATION GROUP WEST $420.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING 05/03/96 161749 THEN BALBOA BAY CLUB $965.40 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 051OY96 151750 EMERCON RESTORATION $5,967.66 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 05/03/96 151751 MARTIN&MILDRED LITKE $4.391.42 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 05/03/96 151752 WORLD RESTORATION $2,469.44 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 05/09/96 151776 AMSA 3525.DD TECHNICAL TRAINING 05/09/96 151779 DONNAANDERSON $67.50 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 05/09/96 1517B0 DE GUELLE B SONS GLASS CO $560.00 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 05/08/96 151781 EMERSON RESTORATION $437.25 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 051=96 151782 PAULINE JOHNSTON AND $3,619.19 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 05/09/95 151783 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS INC $128,563.20 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 3.29-95 TOTAL CWMS PAID $350,003.99 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE-VARIOUS PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID-MISCELLANEOUS HANDWRITE WARRANTS SUMMARY AMOUNT 02 CAP FAC FUND 5423.00 #3 OPER FUND E90.00 OS OPER FUND $538.13 H OPER FUND $251.397.49 CORF $4.333.46 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $93.221.91 $350,003.99 rn x x tp .. N JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING JUNE 26, 1996 Agenda Item (5): Nominations for Joint Chair(Election to be held at regular July Board Meeting). summary As provided in the Joint Boards' Rules of Procedures, nominations for the Joint Chair are made at the regular June meeting and the election takes place at the July regular meeting. Nominations and election of the Vice Joint Chair will be conducted at the July regular meeting. For new Directors' information, we have included below an excerpt from the current Rules of Procedures for meetings relative to the election of the Chair and Vice Chair of the Joint Administrative Organization. "H. Chair and Vice Chair of the Joint Administrative Organization. "A Joint Chair and Vice Chair of the Joint Administrative Organization shall be elected by a majority vote of the Districts at the regular meeting in July of each year. The nominations for Joint Chair shall be made at the regular Board meeting in June each year, and the nominees may prepare a statement of not more than 100 words stating their qualifications for the office of Joint Chair. The statements shall be mailed to members of the Joint Boards of Directors with the agenda and other meeting material for the July regular meeting. "The nominations and election for Vice Joint Chair shall be made at the regular Board meeting in July of each year and shall be made immediately following the election of the Joint Chair. "The Joint Chair and Vice Chair shall serve at the pleasure of a majority of the Districts. In the event the office of Chair becomes vacant due to resignation or retirement of the incumbent prior to the expiration of the regular term, the Vice Joint Chair shall automatically succeed to the office of the Joint Chair and shall continue to serve through the remainder of the regular term unless sooner removed by action of a majority of the Districts. In the event the office of Vice Joint Chair becomes vacant prior to the expiration of the regular term, nominations and the election of a Director to serve in that capacity shall be conducted at the next regular Board meeting. The person so elected shall serve the balance of the regularly-scheduled term unless sooner removed as a result of action by a majority of the Districts." "Subject to the provisions of serving at the pleasure of a majority of the Districts, the Joint Chair shall not serve more than two consecutive one-year terms for which he/she has been elected to the office of Joint Chair." Recommendation Staff has no recommendation. J:%wPD=BSWG9 UNW&05 9 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING JUNE 26, 1996 Agenda Item (9): Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the Joint and individual Districts (each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District). Summary See attached listing of claim payments. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of payment of claims listing. ��vrvooaarvmaiuvwe.® FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 051IN96 PAGE 1 -' REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CMMSPAID05115M POSTING DATE 05/15/96 WARRANTNO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 151784 AC&S $24,227.00 INSULATION REMOVAL-ENGINE EXHAUST PIPING&BOLE 151785 AMS(ACOUSTICAL MAIL SERV) $1,063.71 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 151789 ASCE CONTINUING EDUCATION $664.28 TRAINING MATERIALS 151787 AT&T-MEGACOMSERVICE $2,966.96 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 151788 A T&T-PRO WATTS $910.56 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 151789 A T&T-CELLULAR CR&R $5.04 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 151790 A T&T-CELLULAR CR&R $11.97 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 151791 ABATIX ENVIRONMENTAL $816.50 SAFETY SUPPLIES 151792 ABRASIVE END.TOOLING&EQUIP. $239.19 HARDWARE 151793 AIR CLEANING SPECIALISTS INC $260.00 ELECTRICPARTS 151794 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $38.651.01 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.O.B-Mg 151795 AIRBORNE EXPRESS $8.75 AIR FREIGHT 151798 AMERIDATA $147,154.04 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 151797 AMERICAN AIRLINES $5.871.75 TRAVEL SERVICES 151798 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION $27,610.16 SEWER REPAIRS 151799 BLAKE P.ANDERSON $671.88 REIMBURSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE&MEETING EXP. 151800 ANGEL SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS INC. $323.25 LAB SUPPLIES 151801 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL $330.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 151802 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $4,994.33 NOTICES&ADS 151803 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $2,021.31 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 1518N AQUATIC BIOASSAY&CONSULT $5,905.00 LAB SERVICES 151805 ARMOR-VAC $738.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 151806 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. $135.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL 151807 ATKIWJONES COMPUTER SERVICE $321.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT 151808 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $3,391.84 PAYROLL SERVICES 151809 AWARDS&TROPHIES $11.59 PLAQUES 151810 BFI MEDICAL WASTE SYSTEMS $5.50 WASTE DISPOSAL 151811 BKK LANDFILL $2.654.00 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9.91 151812 E S BABCOCK&SONS INC $2.295.00 LAB ANALYSIS 151813 BARNEBY-SUTCLIFFE CORP. 91,571.39 ELECTRIC PARTS 151814 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $413.89 BATTERIES 151815 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $692.62 LAB SUPPLIES 151816 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $456.55 TRUCK WASH TICKETS 151817 BOW"LIES $331.11 TRUCK PARTS 151816 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $10,475.76 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-18-2 151819 BRENNER-FIEDLER&ASSOC.,INC. $123.69 GENERATORS 151820 BNI BOOKS $321.88 BOOKS 151821 CCI TECHNOLOGIES $5.881.00 PHONE LINE INSTALLATION 151822 CEPA $882.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES IS1823 C.P.I. $1,289.23 LAB SUPPLIES ISIS24 CS COMPANY $5,75391 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 151825 CALTROL,INC. $1,49B.11 HARDWARE 151826 CALIF ASSOC.OF SAN.AGENCIES $130.00 WORK CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 151827 CAMALI CORP. $800.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 151820 CANUS CORPORATION &24,782.50 FIBER OPTIC CABLE 151829 JOHN CAROL-0 ENGINEERS $31.306.34 ENGINEERING SERVICES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 05/1496 PAGE2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05H6/96 POSTING DATE 05115M WARRANT NO, VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 161830 CASHCO $420.84 VALVE 151831 MDT/CASTLE $358.95 LAB SUPPLIES 151032 CENTURY MICRO PRODUCTS $4.799.32 COMPUTER SUPPLIES&SOFTWARE 151833 CHEMWEST INC $576.70 PUMPS 151834 CLAYTON ENVIRO CONSULT $9,236.28 INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE SERVICES 151835 COLE-PARMER INSTRUMENT CO. $240.44 LAB SUPPLIES 151836 COUCH&SONS $191.605.33 CONSTRUCTION 11-17-1 151837 COLOR ARTS INC $4.941.18 PRINTING SERVICES 151836 COMMUNICATIONS PERFORMANCE GROUP $17.850.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES M010.25-95 151839 COMPUSERVE $322.64 COMPUTER SERVICES 151640 CONNELL GM PARTS/DIV. $142.31 TRUCK PARTS 151841 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $10.240.84 ELECTRIC PARTS 151942 CONSUMER PIPE $701.35 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 151843 CONTINENTAL EQUIPMENT&SUPPLY $88.76 TOOLS 151844 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS O C $17,714.34 CONSULTING SERVICES M.O.8.11-93 151846 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $951.29 ENGINE PARTS 151846 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $183.12 TRUCK PARTS 151847 COUNTY CLERK $38.00 NOTICE OF EXEMPTION FEE 151848 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $1,361.31 ELECTRIC PARTS 151849 CUMMINS-ALLISON CORP $961.20 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS 151850 DAILY PILOT $144.00 NOTICES&ADS 151851 J.W.VANGELD CO,INC. $633.57 VALVES 151852 JAMES DARLINGTON $3,262.50 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 151853 DAWS BICYCLES,INC. $149.61 BIKE REPAIRS 151854 ALBERT W.DAVIES.INC. $25.177.77 CONSTRUCTION 3-36R 151855 DELL MARKETING L.P. $10,161.91 COMPUTERS 151856 DEL MAR ANALYTICAL $950.00 BIOSOLIDS ANALYSIS 151857 DEZURICK AND/OR CS CO. $16,464.44 VALVES 151858 DIAMOND LINERS INC $435.27 TRUCK BED LINER 151859 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $5.734.29 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 151860 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $940.00 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 151861 JIM DAVIDSON $403.70 CONFERENCE EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 151862 JAN DEBAY $174.00 CASA CONFERENCE REIMBURSEMENT 151583 ESPNORTH $930.51 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 151864 ELE INTL/SOILTEST PROD $371.35 TOOLS 151865 ELECTRA-BOND,INC. $5,543.74 EQUIPMENT REPAIR 1518M ELECTRO NUMERICS INC $2.593.74 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 161867 ENCHANTER,INC. $2,800.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.&24-95 151868 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $976.20 LAB SERVICES 151869 FLUID TECH.SALES $816.80 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 151870 FMC CORPORATION $52.406.83 HYDROGEN PEROXIDE M09.14-94 151871 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $7,008.75 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10,9.91 151872 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $317.04 AIR FREIGHT 151673 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $695.83 FILTERS 151874 FIRSTCHOICE $778.29 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT 151875 FISCHER B PORTER CO. $7,030.69 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE O5/14196 PAGE 3 - REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05115M POSTING DATE O5115196 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 151870 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $532.50 LAB SUPPLIES 151577 FLOSYSTEMS $19,154.52 PUMP PARTS 151078 FLORIDA CONVEYOR&EQUIP $1.537.69 MECHANICAL PARTS 151879 FORD SAUVAJOT MOMT GROUP $285.00 CONSOLIDATION SERVICES 151080 FORMA SCIENTIFIC,INC. $309.61 FREIGHT CHARGES 151681 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $108.37 PHOTO SUPPLIES 151882 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT 3449.26 PAINT SUPPLIES 151883 THE FOXBORO CO. $954.72 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 151884 FRANKLIN ELECTRONIC PUBLISHERS $244.63 PUBLICATIONS 151585 FRYS ELECTRONICS $3.596.12 ELECTRONIC&COMPUTER SUPPLIES 161886 FURON DEKORON $354.60 CABLE 151887 GKKCORPORATION 310,525AI PROFESSIONAL SERVICES J-11-2 151888 GST,INC. $688.24 OFFICE SUPPLIES 151889 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $623.48 LUMBERMARDWARE 151890 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $3,648.15 CHEMICALS 151891 GE IND&POWER SYSTEMS $9.740.60 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 151892 GENERAL ELECTRIC MULTILIN $235.43 RE-PROGRAM EQUIPMENT 151893 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $1.613.99 ELECTRIC PARTS 151894 GENERAL PETROLEUM $10,993.52 GASOLINE 151895 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1,699.27 TELEPHONE SERVICES 151896 GIERLICH-MITCHELL,INC. $20,165.16 PUMP PARTS 151897 WW GRAINGER.INC. $317.86 COMPRESSOR PARTS 151898 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $169.71 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 151899 GRASBYANDERSEN $2,437.28 ENGINE PARTS 151900 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC WHOLESALE $1,783.86 CABLE ASSEMBLY 161901 DGA CONSULTANTS $5,737.58 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-0-94 151902 KEVIN HADDEN $150.65 CONFERENCE EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 151903 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $1.560.52 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 151904 HATCH&KIRK,INC. $24.35 TRUCK PARTS 151905 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS $2.625.00 CONTAINER RENTALS 151906 Pl.HAWN CO,INC. $698.67 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 151907 HERB'S BLACK FOREST BAKERY $435.10 TRAINING LUNCHEON 151908 HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT $2.083.33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN. 151909 HEWLETTPACKARD $510.74 SERVICE AGREEMENT 151910 HOME DEPOT $156.71 SMALL HARDWARE 151911 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $202.95 PAINT SUPPLIES 151912 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $10.314.99 WATER USE 151913 IPCO SAFETY &12,808.07 SAFETY SUPPLIES 151914 INDUSTRIAL FILTER MFG. $57.97 FILTER 161915 INDUSTRIAL METAL SUPPLY CO, $1.123.40 METAL 151916 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $99,75 CONNECTORS 151917 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $1,065.00 BATTERIES 151918 J2 PRINTING SERVICES $635.31 PRINTING 151919 JAMISON ENGINEERING $49,870.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 151920 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $960.39 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 161921 JAYS CATERING $873.78 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 05/14/96 PAGE4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/15/96 POSTING DATE 05/15/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 151922 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO. $126.08 GAUGE 151923 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $835.95 ELECTRIC PARTS 151924 JONES CHEMICALS,INC. $30,860.61 SODIUM HYPOCHLORTTE M04-2695 151925 JORDAN CONTROLS INC $121.62 REPAIR CIRCUIT BOARD 151926 KALLEEN'S COMPUTER PRODUCTS $239.77 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 151927 KEMIRON PACIFIC,INC. $144,616.93 FERRIC CHLORIDE M09.27-95 151928 KEYE PRODUCTIVITY CENTER $159.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 151929 KING BEARING,INC. $623.39 MACHINE SUPPLIES 151930 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $690.19 TOOLS 151931 IA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $1,280.44 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICE 151932 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY CO. $8.523.00 SAFETY SUPPLIES 1519M LAW/CRANDAL,INC. $12,272.50 SOIL TESTING 7-13-94 151934 LEE&RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC. $54,286.83 ENGINEERING SERVICES 151935 PINKY E.LOPEZ $118.51 COMPUTER SUPPLIES REIMS. 151936 R.F.MACDONALD CO. $1,098.57 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 151037 MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY CORP. $1,046.73 MECHANICAL PARTS 151938 MANLEY'S BOILER REPAIR CO,INC $780.00 BOILER REPAIR 151939 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $702,757.00 CONSTRUCTION P7-36-2 151940 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $34,866.00 CONSTRUCTION P242.2 151941 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $26.89 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 151942 DONALD F.MCINTYRE $424.50 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 151943 MC JUNKIN CORP $3185449 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 151944 MCWELCO RACK-N-BOX CO $1,188.21 TOOLS 151945 MEDICAL BENEFITS $195.00 SUBSCRIPTION 151946 MES COMPANY $1,976.14 MECHANICAL PARTS 151947 MICROTEST INC $250.78 SCANNER REAPIR 151948 MIDWAY MFG.&MACHINING $6,045.09 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 151949 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3,125.80 UNIFORM RENTALS 151950 MOBILE HOSE AND HYDRAULIC $134.66 PUMP PARTS 151951 MONITOR LABS $311.50 INSTRUMENT 151952 MOTION INDUSTRIES,INC. $39.50 PUMP PARTS 151953 NATIONAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION $186.50 SOFTWARE 151954 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $1,656.43 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 151955 RORY NELSON $161.00 CWEA CONF.EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 151956 NETWORK GENERAL CORP. $22,937.37 COMPUTER 151957 NEWARK ELECTRONICS $67.76 INSTRUMENT PARTS 161958 HICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY $11,403.87 LUBRICANTSIDIESEL FUEL 151959 OI CORPORATION $240.74 LAB SUPPLIES 151960 OMNI WESTERN INC $493.73 TOOLS 151961 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL $1,013.65 CHEMICALS 151962 ORANGE COURIER $35.10 COURIER SERVICES 151963 ORIZ FIRE PROTECTION $4,383.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 151964 OXYGEN SERVICE $2,384.74 SPECIALTY GASES 151965 COUNTY OF ORANGE $60.00 ROLL CHANGE PROCESSING FEE 151966 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $9.982.42 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP 151967 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT $31,892.90 GAP WATER USE M.O.8.9.93 FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE O51141M PAGE5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID O5115198 POSTING DATE 05/15/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 151968 PSSI $5,624.10 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION 151959 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $44.79 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 151970 PACIFIC PARTS $20.164.88 INSTRUMENT PARTS 151971 PACIFIC BELL $131.56 TELEPHONE SERVICES 151972 PAGENET $1.053.11 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 151973 PALMIERI,TYLER,WIENER, $11.30 LEGAL SERVICES M.O. A2-91 151974 PEGO SYSTEMS $834.48 HOSE 151975 PERVO PAINT 5684.54 PAINT 151976 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $1.313.74 REIMBURSE PETTY CASH 151977 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $130.139.13 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3-M95 151970 PLANNING SOLUTIONS $750.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 151979 POLY ENTERPRISES INC $608.79 SAFETY SUPPLIES 15198D POLYPURE,INC. $35,789.12 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3.11-92 151981 PRECISION INDUSTRIES $966.60 INSTRUMENT PARTS 151982 PRESENTATION PRODUCTS 948D.23 OFFICE SUPPLIES 151983 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE E95.00 ICE FOR SAMPLES 151984 PULSAFEEDER $3,692.00 PUMP PARTS 151985 PUMPING SOLUTIONS $1.300.50 PUMP 151988 QUALITY BUILDING SUPPLY 8187.44 CONCRETE DYE 151987 RS MEANS CO.,INC. 81,122.67 PUBLICATION 151988 R M CONTROLS $129.85 INSTRUMENT PARTS 151989 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $223.95 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS 151990 R 8 R INSTRUMENTS 893.44 ELECTRIC PARTS 151991 RSA SOIL PODUCTS INC $795.0D SAWDUST 151902 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $2,002.72 TRASH REMOVAL 151993 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO. $195.92 LAB SUPPLIES 151994 RED WINO SHOES $113.78 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 151995 BOLT DELIVERY $54.25 FREIGHT 151996 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DIST $850.81 ELECTRIC PARTS IM997 RUSSELECTRIC $1.718,92 ELECTRIC PARTS 151998 RYAN-HERCO $580.99 METAL 151999 SAFETY WEST $591.39 INSTRUMENT PARTS 152000 SANCON ENGINEERING,INC. $5.200.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 152001 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS $981.29 ELECTRIC PARTS 152002 SCHWINGAMERICA,INC. $385.15 PUMP PARTS 152003 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTL $59.046.89 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.64e 94 152DD4 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $2.016.00 SPECIALTY GASES 1520D5 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $221.38 TOOLS 152006 SHASTA ELECTRIC $48,775.00 INSTALL CONDUIT 152007 SHEPHERD MACHINERY CO. $301.13 TRUCK PARTS 1520DS SHURELUCK SALES $5.328.54 TOOLS/HARDWARE 152009 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO. $341.82 LAB SUPPLIES 152010 SKALAR,INC. $694.25 LAB SUPPLIES 152011 SKILL PATH SEMINARS $207.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 152012 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC 8205V0 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 152013 SMITH-EMERY CO. $431.00 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-13-94 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05114MO PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05115MB POSTING DATE O5H5198 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 152014 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP. $1,237.44 TOOLS 152D15 SOUTH COAST WATER $125.00 LAB SUPPLIES 152016 SO CALIF EDISON CO $67.441.96 POWER 152017 SO CALIF EDISON CO $11,365.55 POWER 1520I8 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $19.199.23 NATURAL GAS 152019 SO.CALIF.WATER CO. $68.31 WATER USE 152020 STAMEN Z.SPASSOFF P.E. 32,400.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19.2 152021 STANDARD SUPP 8 EQUIP CO 5402.68 MECHANICAL PARTS 152022 STERLING ART $25.24 ART SUPPLIES 152023 SUMMIT STEEL $2,095.74 METAL 152024 SUNSETFORD $80.65 TRUCK PARTS 152025 SUNSET INDUSTRIAL PARTS $135.94 MECHANICAL PARTS 152026 SUPELCO,INC. 5300.84 LAB SUPPLIES 152027 SUPERB ONE-HOUR PHOTO $29.54 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 152028 SUPER POWER PRODUCTS $517.20 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 152029 SYMCAS 547.50 CONSULTING SERVICES 162030 SYSCOMINC $8,000.00 INSTALLATION B TRAINING FOR NEW DATABASE SYSTEM 152031 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $2,680.10 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 152032 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $893.98 MECHANICAL PARTS 152033 TONYS LOCK&SAFE SERVICE $1,139,95 LOCKS 8 KEYS 152034 ED TORRES $214.23 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 152035 TOSHIBA INTERNATIONAL $76,31 INSTRUMENT PARTS 152036 TOUCHSTONE SOFTWARE CORP. $60.52 DIAGNOSTIC UPGRADE KIT 152037 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE,INC. $372.67 TRUCK PARTS 152038 TREBOR ELECTRONICS $1,108.27 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 152039 MITCH TRIVANOVICH $745.50 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 152040 TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY,INC. $7,298.84 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.0.5.11-94 152041 TRUCK 6 AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $931.93 TRUCK PARTS 152042 TRUCK PARTS SUPPLY $169.81 TRUCK PARTS 152D43 JG TUCKER 8 SON,INC. $2.715.26 INSTRUMENT PARTS 152044 TUSTIN DODGE $56.87 TRUCK PARTS 152045 UNISOURCEWOR BUTLER PAPER $50.97 OFFICE SUPPLIES 152046 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $426.01 PARCEL SERVICES 152047 VWR SCIENTIFIC $2.848.26 LAB SUPPLIES 152048 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $4,392.99 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 152049 VERNE'S PLUMBING $110.00 PLUMBING SERVICES 152050 VERTEX TECHNOLOGIES,INC. 5490AS FIBER OPTICS 152D51 WACKENHUT CORP. $3,389.69 CONTRACT SERVICESECURITY GUARDS 152052 WARDIDAVIS COMMUNICATIONS E7,205.80 FIBER OPTIC TEST KIT 152053 CARL WARREN B CO. $300.00 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR 152054 WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION $34.50 PUBLICATION 152055 WATERMAN SUPPLY $767.72 CHAIN 152D58 WEAVER B THOMAS $297.47 PERMIT REFUND 152D57 MRS.WILLIAM WELTER $193.13 PERMIT REFUND 152058 WESTERN METRO UNIT $1.743.31 FILTERS 152059 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $30,229.69 CAUSTIC SODA NO 8-23-95 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05/14196 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CMMSPAID05/15M POSTING DATE O5/15M WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 152060 WEST-LTIE SUPPLY CO. 9114.84 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 152061 WESCO $371.74 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 152062 NANCYWHEATLEY $811.38 MEETING EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 152053 JUDITHAWILSON $106.87 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 152064 WIRE MARKERS,INC. $504.91 FIBER OPTIC TOOLS 152065 ROURKE,WOODRUFF S SPRADLIN $7.570.00 LEGAL SERVICES MO 7-26-95 152066 WORDPERFECT $39.W SUBSCRIPTION TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 05/15M $2.590.613.15 SUMMARY AMOUNT 41 OPER FUND $1,353.52 42 OPER FUND $5,966.70 43 OPER FUND E58,576.OB 43 CAP FAC FUND $54.541.72 45 OPER FUND $4,340.63 46 OPER FUND $72.68 46 CAP FAC FUND $12,395.34 47 OPER FUND $14,518.55 R7 CAP FAC FUND $856.61 411 OPER FUND $12,170.67 411 CAP FAC FUND $211,305.42 014 CAP FAC FUND $27.25 4568 OPER FUND $2,380.22 4568 CAP FAC FUND $9.298.96 4647 OPER FUND $5,043.13 47&14 OPER FUND $6,886.43 Jr OPER FUND $873,862.52 CORF $1,129.139.08 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $12,365.75 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $175.613.91 $2.590.613.16 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05241% PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0529198 POSTING DATE 052 96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 152095 ABB LOGISTICS CENTER $3,240.05 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 152097 ACS PUBLICATIONS $169.85 PUBLICATION 152095 ASL CONSULTING ENGINEERS 5460.00 ATWOOD SUBTRUNK PLAN PREPARATION 152099 AT&T-MEGACOM SERVICE $703.66 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 152100 AT&T-CELLULAR CR BR $13.27 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 152101 A T&T-CELLULAR CR&R $6.77 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 152102 ABRASIVE ENG.TOOLING B EQUIP. $109.60 HARDWARE 152103 ACCOUNTANTS OVERLOAD $2.651.20 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 152104 ACTION DOOR REPAIR CORP. $324.93 DOOR REPAIRS 152105 ADMOR MEMORY $1,805.17 COMPUTER PARTS 152106 TERRY ANN 5329.54 CONFERENCE EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 152107 AIR CLEANING SERVICES CO $1.465.22 FILTERS 152108 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $18.328.78 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.0.8-&88 152109 AIRBORNE EXPRESS $182.75 AIR FREIGHT 152110 AMERIDATA $0,158.51 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 152111 AMERICAN SIGMA $350.60 MISCELLANEOUS HARDWARE 152112 AMOCO ENERGY TRADING $37,802.61 NATURAL GAS MO6-28-05 152113 ANGELUS PACIFIC CO.,INC. 5203.79 CARPOOLTAGS 152114 ANIXTER-DISTRIBUTION 54,637.34 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 152115 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $11,633.06 NOTICES&ADS 152116 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE,INC. $026.32 TOXIC WASTE REMOVAL 152117 AUTODESK INC $424.71 SOFTWARE 152118 AWARDS&TROPHIES 524.24 PLAQUES 152119 BE WIRE ROPE B RIGGING $182.22 AUTO PARTS 152120 E S BABCOCK&SONS INC $810.00 LAB ANALYSIS 152121 BANANA BLUEPRINT $8,201.03 PRINTING M.O.11-07-94 152122 BARNES&NOBLE BOOKS S36614 PUBLICATIONS 152123 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $949.90 BATTERIES 152124 BAUER COMPRESSOR $162.49 COMPRESSOR PARTS 152125 BAYSHORE PSYCHOLOGY CENTER S170.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 152126 BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS $85.52 LAB EQUIPMENT 152127 BIO-GRO DIVISION 587,221.88 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 4-26-95 152120 BUDGET JANITORIAL $3,330.00 JANITORIAL SERVICES MO 1.12-94 152129 THE BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFFAIRS $769.34 SUBSCRIPTION ON CD 152130 BUSH&ASSOCIATES,INC. $678.00 SURVEYING SERVICES MO 6&94 152131 CEM CORPORATION 5543.61 LAB SUPPLIES 152132 CH2M HILL $216.213.02 ENGINEERING SERVICES JJ7 152133 C.L.TECHNOLOGY E720.00 GAS ANALYSIS SERVICES 152134 C.P.I. $1,060.80 LAB SUPPLIES 152136 CPU COMPUTER REPAIR $221.15 COMPUTER REPAIR 152130 CS COMPANY $5,335.89 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 152137 CWCI $21.01 PUBLICATIONS 152138 THE CALBOND JOURNAL $59.00 SUBSCRIPTION 152139 CALFON CONSTRUCTION $213,870.95 CONSTRUCTION 7.22&744 152140 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH INC, $74.02 LAB SUPPLIES 152141 CAMALI CORP, $2.576.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05/24/96 PAGE 2 ' REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0529M POSTING DATE 0529196 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 152142 CANUS CORPORATION $24.750.00 FIBER OPTIC CABLE 152143 JOHN CARDILLO ENGINEERS $94.176.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES P7-38.J-33 152144 CASA $130.00 REGISTRATION-KEVIN RADDEN 152145 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $996.69 OFFICE FURNITURE 152146 CENTURY MICRO PRODUCTS $6,895.92 COMPUTER PARTS 152147 CERFNET $20.00 COMPUTER SERVICES 152148 CERTEX ELECTRONICS INC $969.09 COMPUTER REPAIR 152149 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $300.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 152150 COAST INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO. $43.98 MISCELLANEOUS HARDWARE 152151 COLD SAWS OF AMERICA,INC. $26.45 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 152152 COUCH&SONS $30,292.20 CONSTRUCTION M*" 162153 COUCH&SONS $59,398.00 CONSTRUCTION 11-17-1 152154 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $1,794.38 PUMP PARTS 152155 COMPUTERS AMERICA $208.72 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 152156 COMPUTERS AND ACCESSORIES CORP $1,064A4 PRINTER SUPPLIES 162157 CONNELL GM PARTS I DIV. $48.67 TRUCK PARTS 152158 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $3.780.22 ELECTRIC PARTS 152159 CONSOLIDATED REPROGRAPHICS $79.74 PRINTING SERVICES 152160 CONSTRUCTION FABRICATORS,INC. $573.98 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 152161 CONSUMER PIPE $224.08 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 152162 CONTINENTAL EQUIPMENT&SUPPLY $155.21 TOOLS 152163 CONTROL SPECIALISTS INC $991.17 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 152164 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS O C $2,434.50 CONSULTING SERVICES M.O.8-11-93 152185 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $3.331.22 ENGINE PARTS 152168 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $196.35 TRUCK PARTS 152167 C S U F FOUNDATION $25,000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 15216E DCC I CAL INC $1.196.03 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 152169 J.W.OANGELO CO,INC. $491.34 VALVES 152170 DAPPER TIRE $123.70 TIRES 152171 JAMES DARLINGTON $4,312.50 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 152172 ALBERT W.DAMES,INC. $6861908.65 CONSTRUCTION 3.3611 152173 DELMARANALYTICAL $890.00 SIOSOLIDS ANALYSIS 152174 DELTA PACKAGING PRODUCTS,INC. $145.00 LAB SUPPLIES 152175 DEZURICK AND/OR CS CO. $1.281.39 VALVES 152176 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $5,835.73 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 152177 DIVERSIFIED INSPECTION $2,668.00 PUMP STATION INSPECTIONS 152178 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $642.06 PAINT SUPPLIES 152179 EIM COMPANY,INC. $1.088.82 REPAIR 152180 EIMCO PROCESS EQUIPMENT CO. $9.099.49 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 152181 EMA SERVICES INC $12,500.00 CONSULTING SERVICES 152182 ESP NORTH $972.38 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 152183 ELDRIDGE PRODUCTS INC. $5,997.11 METER 152184 ELECTRA-BOND,INC. $619.66 REPAIR BEARING CARRIER FRAME 152185 ELECTRO NUMERICS INC $485.64 INDICATOR ENCLOSURE 152186 ELSINORE HOMES INC $940.00 DECK INSTALLATION 152197 EMERGENCY MGMT NETWORK $3.340.00 CPRIFIRST AID TRAINING FUND NO 9199 - Jr DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05124/96 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0529/98 POSTING DATE 0529M6 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 15218E ENCHANTER,INC. $4.900.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5-24-95 152189 DAVE ENGSTROM $159.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 162190 DARRELL ENNIS $250,00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 152191 FLUID TECH.SALES $314.18 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 152192 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $2.787.50 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O. 10-9-91 152193 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $434.45 AIR FREIGHT 152194 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. 81,151.39 LAB SUPPLIES 152195 FLICKINGER CO $1,792.02 VALVE 162190 FLOSYSTEMS $380.15 PUMP PARTS 152197 FLUKE CORP. $9,568.52 LAN FLUKE ANALYZER 152198 TIM FOLEY 8885.00 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 152199 FORD SAUVAJOT MGMT GROUP $2,610.48 CONSOLIDATION SERVICES 162200 CLIFFORD A FORKERT $991.00 SURVEYING SERVICES MO 64495 162201 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $176.29 PHOTO SUPPLIES 152202 CT'OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $11,239.08 WATER USE 152203 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $60.78 PAINT SUPPLIES 152204 THE FOXBORO CO. $808.56 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 1522D5 FULL SPECTRUM ANALYTICS INC $16.737.74 LAB SUPPLIES 152208 EST,INC. $365.91 OFFICE SUPPLIES 152207 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $105.46 LUMBERHARDWARE 152208 GENERAL ELECTRIC MULTILIN $62.00 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 152209 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $530.37 ELECTRIC PARTS 152210 GENERAL OCEANICS,INC. $264.61 LAB SERVICES 162211 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $5,366.16 TELEPHONE SERVICES 152212 GIERLICH-MITCHELL,INC. $2,840.03 PUMP PARTS 152213 GILMORE'S $323.25 AUTO PARTS 152214 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $440.75 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 162215 DGA CONSULTANTS $7.680.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.68-94 162216 GRIFFIN CARRICK $3,833.93 LEGAL SERVICES-TECHITE MO 9.27-95 152217 KEVIN MADDEN $231.70 EXPENSE REIM.FOR CASA CONF. 152210 HATCH 8 KIRK,INC. $39.16 TRUCK PARTS 152219 PL HAWN CO,INC. $468.00 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 152220 HERB'S BLACK FOREST BAKERY $87.50 TRAINING LUNCHEON 152221 HIGHWAY PRODUCTS $1.557.00 TOOLBOXES 152222 HILTI,INC. $474.11 TOOLS 152223 HOKE CONTROLS DIV/HOKE INC. $488.45 VALVES 152224 HOME DEPOT $235.71 SMALL HARDWARE 152225 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $279.44 PAINT SUPPLIES 152228 HUNTINGTON AMC I JEEP I RENAULT $1,381.69 TRUCK PARTS 152227 HYDROTEX INC $3.922.27 LUBE OIL 152228 IDM CONTROLS INC $1,776.61 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 152229 IPCO SAFETY $10.49619 SAFETY SUPPLIES 152230 ISLUA CONFERENCE $475.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 152231 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $345.73 CONNECTORS 152232 INORGANIC VENTURES $800.00 LAB SUPPLIES 152233 INSTRUMENT LABORATORY $659.13 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 0524/98 PAGE4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0529MS POSTING DATE 0529/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 152234 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $108.11 WATER USE 152235 JP MORGAN SECURITIES $75,670.22 REMARKETING, 19M92 SERIES C COPS 152236 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $471.41 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 152237 JANUS INC $116.20 LAB SUPPLIES 152238 DEE JASPAR B ASSOC $1.163.32 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 162239 JAYS CATERING $815.16 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE 152240 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO. $125.95 GAUGE 152241 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $269.88 ELECTRIC PARTS 152242 JONES CHEMICALS,INC. $7,360.38 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE M04-26-95 152243 KMI INDUSTRIES $171.77 TECHUTE INSULATION 152244 KABBARA ENGINEERING $3,038.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 152245 KEMIRON PACIFIC,INC. $57,587.58 FERRIC CHLORIDE M09-27-95 152246 KING BEARING,INC. $759.72 MACHINE SUPPLIES 152247 KLEINFELDER $4,028.85 GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTING SERVICES 152248 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $515.11 TOOLS 152249 ORANGE COUNTY DIVISION $500.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES 152250 LEE 6 RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC. $22,633.76 ENGINEERING SERVICES 152251 LIMTTOROUE CORP. $227.95 ELECTRIC PARTS 152252 LOGIC MICRO CENTERS,LMS $1,074.75 TRAINING EQUIPMENT RENTAL 152253 MDT BIOLOGIC COMPANY $1.413.00 LAB SUPPLIES 152254 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $100.13 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 162265 DONALD F.MCINTYRE $112.15 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 152256 JE MEINHARD ASSOCIATES,INC. $792.58 LAB SUPPLIES 152257 MELLON TRUST $14,945.71 CUSTODIAL BANK SERVICES 152258 MICROBE MASTERS $7,500.00 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 152259 MICROFLEX MEDICAL CORP $365.00 SAFETY SUPPLIES 152250 MIDWAY MFG.B MACHINING $3.416.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 162281 MISSION ABRASIVE SUPPLIES $117.09 RUBBER GLOVES 152262 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3,937.57 UNIFORM RENTALS 152263 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO. $220.00 INSTRUMENT 152264 MODERN DATA PRODUCTS $2,501.55 PRINTER SUPPLIES 152265 MICHAEL D.MOORE 5430.73 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 152266 NAT WEST MARKETS $760.00 COP INTEREST DRAW FEES 152267 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES $10,522.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 152268 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $2.356.60 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 152269 NELSON DIVISION $654.06 MECHANICAL PARTS 152270 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $47.58 WATER USE 152271 HICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY $12,176.20 LUBRICANTS/DIESEL FUEL 152272 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $439.57 SAFETY GLASSES 152273 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $5.435.70 OFFICE SUPPLIES 152274 OFFICE PAVILIONSANTERIOR RESOURCES $4.199.56 OFFICE FURNITURE REPAIRS 152275 THE OHMART CORP $1.470.00 SAFETY TRAINING 152276 ORANGE COUNTY PUMP CO $822.80 ELECTRICAL PARTS 152277 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE 5273.18 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 152278 ORANGE COURIER $153.65 COURIER SERVICES 152279 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. $148.40 FITTINGS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0524l% PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/29/96 POSTING DATE 05/29IN WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 152280 ORANGE COUNTY FORUM $160.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES 152281 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT $28.195.20 GAP WATER USE M.O.6-9-93 152282 PACIFIC INVESTMENT MGMT CO $118,164.00 INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT SERVICES 152283 PACIFIC PARTS $24.259.53 INSTRUMENT PARTS 152204 PACIFIC BELL $1,294.59 TELEPHONE SERVICES 152205 PAGENET $1.208.75 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 152286 PAINE WEBBER $61,394.69 REMARKET AGREE.FOR ADVANCE REFUNDING OF COPS 152287 PAK WEST $1,095.79 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 152288 PARKHOUSE TIRE,INC. $289.63 TIRES 162289 PERMA SEAL $559.72 LUBE OIL 152290 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $1.054.12 REIMB.PETTY CASH 152291 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $129,548.16 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3-29.95 152292 POLYPURE,INC. $21,022.20 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0311-92 152293 POSITIVE FORMULATORS,INC. $197.23 CHEMICALS 152294 RSA SOIL PRODUCTS INC $795.00 SAWDUST 152295 RAMCO SPECIALTY PRODUCTS $767.49 PARTS CLEANER 162298 RAIN FOR RENT $1.099.98 SEWER BY-PASS PIPING 152297 BOLT DELIVERY AND/OR $24.00 DELIVERY SERVICE 152298 GEORGE ROBERTSON $87.00 MILEAGE EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 152299 JOSEPH T RYERSON&SON IN $328.45 METAL 152300 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTL $18,667.36 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6$94 152301 R.CRAIG SCOTT&ASSOC. $53.373.17 LEGAL SERVICES-PERSONNEL ISSUES 152302 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $134.19 SPECIALTY GASES 152303 SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS,INC. $431.25 LAB REPAIRS 1523D4 STUARTSEVERN $1,323.25 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 162305 SEWER EQUIP CO OF AMERICA $666.08 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 152306 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $65.51 TOOLS 162307 SHURELUCK SALES $18.624.68 TOOLS/HARDWARE 1523GB SIGMA CHEMICAL CO. $114.32 LAB SUPPLIES 152309 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC S7,1D9.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 152310 SMITH-EMERY CO. $599.00 SOIL TESTING M.0.743-94 162311 SOUTH COAST WATER $70.00 LAB SUPPLIES 152312 SO CALIF EDISON GO $29,895A4 POWER 152313 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $18,626.57 NATURAL GAS 152314 SPARLING INSTRUMENT CO.,INC. $269.88 METER 152315 SUMMIT STEEL $280.15 METAL 152316 SUPER CHEM CORP. S608.10 CHEMICALS 152317 TEKTRONIX,INC. $2,911.90 INSTRUMENT PARTS 152318 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $82.42 MECHANICAL PARTS 152319 EDWARD M.TORRES $317.36 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 152320 TOWN CREATIVE SERVICES $474.76 MAILING SERVICES 152321 TREBOR ELECTRONICS $259.22 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 152322 TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY,INC. $6.549.84 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.0.5-11-94 152323 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $510.11 TRUCK PARTS 152324 TRUESDAIL LABS $1,289.00 LAB SERVICES 152325 JO TUCKER&SON,INC. $1.026.72 INSTRUMENT PARTS FUND NO 9199 - n DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0524196 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0529M POSTING DATE 0529196 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 152326 USPOSTAL SERVICE 85,000.00 POSTAGE 152327 UNISOURCES/OR BUTLER PAPER $7.818.73 OFFICE SUPPLIES 152328 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $1,524.14 PARCEL SERVICES 152329 VWR SCIENTIFIC $7,082.90 LAB SUPPLIES 152330 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $I,D58.63 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 152331 VALVATE ASSOCIATES $635.63 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 152332 VORTEX INDUSTRIES $992.81 BUILDING REPAIRS 152333 W.S.SA. $225.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 152334 WAL-CON CONSTRUCTION CO. $131,839.40 CONSTRUCTION 5374 152335 CARL WARREN B CO. $473.17 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR 152338 WEF $15.00 PUBLICATION 152337 WESTERN METRO UNIT $1.301.33 FILTERS 162338 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $20,934.97 CAUSTIC SODA MO 8-23-95 152339 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $578.17 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 152340 WHESSOE VAREC $4,494.73 VALVES 152341 ROURKE.WOODRUFF 6 SPRADLIN $73,629.14 LEGAL SERVICES MO 7-2695 152342 XEROX CORP. $20,471.97 COPIER LEASES TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 0529196 82.827.886.66 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05/24/96 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0529196 POSTING DATE OS129196 SUMMARY AMOUNT #1 CONST FUND $15,641.05 02 OPER FUND 56,391.90 02 CAP FAC FUND $3,518.00 02 CONST FUND $41.999.82 43 OPER FUND $16,850.89 #3 CAP FAC FUND 5702,378.58 #3 CONST FUND $44.790.36 95 OPER FUND $2,210.77 #5 CONST FUND $4.414.11 #6 CONST FUND $7,662.86 07 OPER FUND $4.071.34 #7 CAP FAC FUND $213,056.69 #7 CONST FUND $9,930.21 #11 OPER FUND $24.17 911 CAP FAC FUND $63,940.85 #11 CONST FUND $12,826.88 013 CONST FUND $78.70 014 OPER FUND $29.57 014 CAP FAC FUND $26.36 - #14 CONST FUND $462.92 . #3&11 OPER FUND 35.112.50 #5&8 OPER FUND $17.70 #5&6 CAP FAC FUND $133.121.28 #6&7 OPER FUND $213.52 07&14 OPER FUND $81011 JT OPER FUND $549.841.92 CORF $460.108.02 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $65.656.09 ,IT DIST WORKING CAPITAL 5353,891.31 $2,827.ON 66 FUND NO 9109 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE-VARIOUS PAGE1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID-MISCELLANEOUS HANDWRITE WARRANTS WARRANT DATE WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 05/17/96 152087 BETTER FLOORS B RESTORATION $4,286.02 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 051171% 152058 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $40,432.39 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-38,J-33 05117M 162059 DALY B FANNY FRIEDSTADT $9.097.16 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 05/17/96 152070 DIAL ONE GENE BELL INC. $418.00 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 05/17/96 152071 WATEREUSE ASSOCIATION $150.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 05/17/96 152072 WORLD RESTORATION $2,112.27 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 0520/88 152073 CMS,INC. $5,000.00 RETAINER FEE O 0196 152074 JAMES COWAN $108.00 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 0520196 152075 KERRY CONSULTING GROUP $4,896.81 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MO 11-15.95 0521/96 152D94 LOGIC MICRO CENTERS,LMS $913.13 TRAINING EQUIPMENT RENTAL 05=196 152095 BARCLAYS BANK PLC $98,042.00 COP LIQUIDITY FEES 0529/96 152343 MTA USBC $150.00 INVESTMENT POLICY/REVIEW 0529/98 152344 TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION $179.95 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 05/30M 152345 GARDEN GROVE UNIF.SCHOOL DIST $96.00 ROOM RENTAL 05131M 152346 THE BALBOA SAY CLUB $3,358.23 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 05TJU96 152347 EMERCON CONSTRUCTION $648.76 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 05TJ1/96 152348 PAUUNEJOHNSTON $4,990.43 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM Domm 152371 A.O.TECH 5460.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING TOTAL CLAIMS PAID $175,329.16 SUMMARY AMOUNT JT OPER FUND $108.00 CORF $45,329.20 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $24,910.87 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $104,981.08 $175,329.15 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING JUNE 26, 1996 Agenda Item (1 0): Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), in an amount not to exceed $185,000 for payment of various fees required by SCAQMD regulations, payable during fiscal year 1996-97. Summary The California Clean Air Act (CAA) authorizes the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD)to assess and collect fees from public agencies for annual fees for emission of criteria pollutants, air toxics and ozone precursors; evaluating and issuing Permits to Construct and annual operating permits; compliance source testing reviewing; and permit/plan applications and other applicable requirements. SCAQMD did propose across the board a 1.2% fee increase in fiscal year 1996-97. However, due to the expected reduced number of permit/plan application fees for our facilities, the proposed budget for the next fiscal year is less than last year. Expenses are also expected to be lower than in the previous fiscal year due to greater emphasis on in-house compliance administration. The 1995-96 authorization was $250,000. The estimated fees payable to SCAOMD in fiscal year 1996-97 are as follows: Type of Fee Amount Annual Emissions $80,000 Annual Operating Permits 40,000 CARB Emissions 15,000 Compliance Source Testing 20,000 Permit 8. Plan Applications 20,000 Miscellaneous 10 000 TOTAL $185,000 Budget The budgeted amount contained in Districts' proposed 1996-97 budget is for$185,000. This budgeted amount is located in the Proposed Budget, section 4, page 7, identified as AQMD Operating fees. Staff Recommendation Staff is requesting authorization to issue a blanket purchase order to SCAQMD, in an amount not to exceed $185,000, and to pay all applicable fees for the 1996-97 fiscal year in compliance with SCAOMD rules and regulations. If further information is requested, please contact Kevin Hadden. JAWPDCCSWAGNVUN9616.to a JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING JUNE 26, 1996 Agenda Item (11 ): Consideration of Resolution No. 96-54, amending Personnel and Salary Resolution No. 95-105 to reflect agreement with represented employee units to substitute the MetraHealth Point-of-Service Plan for the Northwestern National Life Medical Coverage; fund dependent medical premiums at 80% and employee- only coverage at 100%; convert dental insurance from self-funded to fully-insured through Delta Dental; and amend plan documents accordingly effective July 1, 1996. umma Please see General Counsel's memorandum attached. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No. 96-54. J AW PD0MB3 W G96U U NN9M.11 RESOLUTION NO. 96-54 AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 95-105 (Personnel and Salary) A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING PERSONNEL AND SALARY RESOLUTION NO. 95-105 TO REFLECT AGREEMENT WITH REPRESENTED EMPLOYEE UNITS TO SUBSTITUTE THE METRAHEALTH POINT-OF-SERVICE PLAN FOR THE NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL LIFE MEDICAL COVERAGE; FUND DEPENDENT MEDICAL PREMIUMS AT 80% AND EMPLOYEE ONLY COVERAGE AT 100%, CONVERT DENTAL INSURANCE FROM SELF- FUNDED TO FULLY-INSURED THROUGH DELTA DENTAL, AND AMEND PLAN DOCUMENTS ACCORDINGLY EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 1996 The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: Section 38, Article XXIV of Resolution No. 95-105 is amended to read as follows: 'The Districts shall provide medical-health insurance coverage through both Health Maintenance Organizations and an indemnity plan, which at the Districts' discretion may be self-funded or insured, in accordance with the level of benefits provided in the plans in effect as of the date of adoption of this resolution, or any amendments thereto, relating to said coverage, together with life insurance, and 1 disability insurance for the benefit of regular full-time employees. All insurance coverage shall become effective on the first day of the month following one full month of employment. An open enrollment period will be held annually in the month of June." Section 2: Section 39, Article XXIV of Resolution No. 95-105 is repealed. Section 3: Section 39, Article XXIV of Resolution No. 95-105 is added to read as follows: 'The Districts will provide a medical - health insurance plan for the benefit of its employees. The Districts will contribute 100% of the premium for employee only coverage and will contribute 80% of the premium for employee plus one (1) dependent and full family coverage under the medical - health insurance plans selected by the Districts. Any future change in insurance rates will be shared equally in the same ratio as premiums are currently paid by the Districts and employees." Section 4: Section 40, Article XXIV of Resolution No. 95-105 is repealed. Section 5: Section 44, Article XXIV of Resolution No. 95-105 is amended to read as follows: "Section 44. The Districts shall provide a dental insurance plan. Employees shall contribute the following monthly costs for the Districts' insured Dental Plan: $0.00 for employee 2 P only coverage; and, $9.00 for full family coverage." Section 6: Section 46, Article XXIV of Resolution No. 95-105 is amended to read as follows: "Section 46. The Districts reserve the right to unilaterally change plan providers for any of the insurance coverages set forth in this Article XXIV. In the event the Districts add additional optional insurance plans, the Districts' share of the premium will be the same as for existing plans as set forth in Section 39, as amended. In the event the Districts change underwriters for existing insurance plans, or the underwriters change the premium rates during the term of any Memorandum of Understanding between the Districts and the employee representative organizations, the Districts' share of the premium will be the same as for existing insurance plans as set forth in Section 39, as amended." PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 26, 1996. 3 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING JUNE 26, 1996 Agenda Item (12): Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager, or his designee, to designate members of the Boards and/or staff to attend and participate in various training programs, meetings, hearings, conferences, facility inspections and other functions which, in his opinion, will be of value to the Districts or affect the Districts' interests, including, but not limited to, those conducted by organizations providing specific training, state and federal legislative and regulatory bodies and the California Association of Sanitation Agencies, California Water Environment Association, Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies, and the Water Environment Federation; and authorizing reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging and incidental expenses in accordance with existing Districts' policies and the approved annual budget for 1996-97. umma On an annual basis, the General Manager is routinely authorized to designate members of the Board and/or staff to attend training programs, legislative, regulatory and other meetings and functions, conferences, etc., which he believes will be of value to the Districts. Such attendance is in accordance with existing Districts' travel and expense reimbursement policies (the maximum per diem for meals and incidentals is $40/day) and the approved annual budget. It is recommended that this authorization be renewed for 1996-97. Included in the 1996-97 budget is the amount of$714,000 for training, meetings and travel. The budget amount includes funds for staff training for treatment plant and electrical, mechanical, instrumentation and other systems, wastewater treatment and laboratory work; computerized systems; supervisory and management training; attendance and participation in state and federal legislative and regulatory proceedings, participation in various wastewater management-related groups; Board committee meeting expenses, and other related expenses. Recommendation Staff recommends approval. J1WPDOQBSAG UN9 12 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING JUNE 26, 1996 Agenda Item (13): Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to approve travel of James Hams, Districts' staff engineer, to attend the witness testing of blower equipment required in connection with Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36-2, tentatively scheduled from July 29 through August 2, 1997 in Denmark. (Travel, lodging and incidental expenses to be paid by Margate Construction, Inc.) Summary Job No. Pt-36-2, Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, is a $ 34.9 million contract to expand the secondary treatment capacity at Plant No. 1. The project provides ten new secondary darifiers, replacement of the existing aeration system, replacement of existing blowers, renovation of three existing dissolved air flotation thickeners, three new dissolved air flotation thickeners, and other improvements. These improvements will increase the secondary capacity from 46 million gallons per day(mgd) to 80 mgd. The plans and specifications were prepared by Carollo Engineers, and the construction contract was awarded in June 1995 to Margate Construction, Inc. This project incorporates the upgrading of the existing blower system at a cost of approximately $3,000,000. The approved blowers, supplied by Turblex, Inc., will incorporate a more efficient design which will offer the Districts significant energy savings compared to the existing blowers. The Districts have no direct experience with these new Turblex blowers, but our Design Consultant's research has found that there are many successful installations throughout the United States. The Contract Specifications provide for the Districts' representatives to witness the factory performance testing of major pieces of equipment. The Turblex manufacturing and testing site is located in Helsingor, Denmark. It is intended to send a representative from the designer, Carollo Engineers, who is experienced in this type of mechanical equipment and testing. The witness testing also provides an opportunity for a District engineer to become more intimately familiar with the design and operation of an important and major piece of Districts' equipment. The contract includes travel and per diem costs for the Districts' representatives to witness this performance testing, to be paid for by the Contractor. Therefore, the only additional cost to the Districts is Mr. Harris' salary. The witness testing is required to verify that the air flow capacity, horsepower, and overall efficiencies meet the requirements of the Contract Specifications. The testing will take approximately one week, and is tentatively scheduled for the end of July 1996. A final testing schedule has not been received. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that Mr. Harris be authorized to attend the witness testing of the Turblex blower equipment in Helsingon, Denmark. All travel, lodging, and per diem expenses are covered under the existing contract. Therefore, the only additional cost to the Districts is Mr. Hams' time (salary estimated at$1,350 for 40 hours). Jl�UN98K13 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING JUNE 26, 1996 District 2 Agenda Item (14): Consideration of motion approving Interim Settlement Agreement with Security Capital Investment Trust, providing for deferral of determination of total fees due, pending outcome of District's study of connection fees. 5ummary Please see General Counsel's memorandum dated June 17, 1996. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Board of Directors approve Interim Settlement Agreement with Security Capital Investment Trust. J\WPDOCOSWGMUUN9K.14 V a JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING JUNE 26, 1996 District 7 Agenda Item (15): consideration of motion to receive and file Summons & Complaint for Personal Injury, Property Damage, and General Negligence Premises Liability, Daisy Brood vs. Calfon Construction, Inc., at al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 764464, relative to personal injuries and property damage sustained in connection with the construction of Parallel and Replacement Portions of Lemon Heights Subtrunk Sewer, La Colina Drive to Newport Boulevard, Contract No. 7-22, and Manhole Access Modifications to RA-14 Sewer at Newport Boulevard and Cowan Heights Drive, Contract No. 7-24; and authorize the District's General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the District. Summary Please see General Counsel's memorandum dated June 7, 199& Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Board of Directors receive and file Summons & Complaint for Personal Injury, Property Damage, and General Negligence Premises Liability, Daisy Brood vs. Calfon Construction, Inc., et al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 764464, relative to personal injuries and property damage sustained in connection with the construction of Parallel and Replacement Portions of Lemon Heights Subtrunk Sewer, La Colina Drive to Newport Boulevard, Contract No. 7-22, and Manhole Access Modifications to RA-14 Sewer at Newport Boulevard and Cowan Heights Drive, Contract No. 7-24; and authorize the District's General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the District. J:%W PDO GBS W G9SU U N9&5.15 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California P.O.Box 8127 • IDS" Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714) 962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE Wednesday, May 22, 1996 - 5:30 p.m. A meeting of the Steering Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held Wednesday, May 22, 1996, at 5:30 p.m., at the Districts' Administrative office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: STEERING COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Present: John C. Cox, Jr., Joint Chair STAFF PRESENT: Peer A. Swan, Vice Joint Chair Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager George Brown, Chair, FAHR Judith A. Wilson, Assistant General Manager John J. Collins, Chair, PDC Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary Pat McGuigan, Chair, OMTS Absent: Roger Stanton, Vice Chair, FAHR (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. (4) APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the April 24, 1996 Steering Committee meeting were approved as drafted. Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting Page 2 May 22, 1996 (5) REPORTS OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR, GENERAL MANAGER AND GENERAL COUNSEL (a) Committee Chair Report. Chair Cox discussed what he considered conflicting direction on an issue affecting consolidation at the May 15 Executive Committee meeting. The Executive Committee must address the section under which the i consolidation will be filed, either Section 4730 or Section 4730.1. If consolidation goes forward under Section 4730, IRWD will not be entitled to a seat on the Board. If consolidation is implemented under Section 4730.1, three more cities and two water districts would be added to the Boards, resulting in dual representation. This needs to be resolved at the next Executive Committee meeting, scheduled for June 19, and a recommendation made at the June 26 Joint Boards Meeting. (b) There was no report by the General Manager. (c) There was no report by Counsel. (6) DISCUSSION ITEMS (a) Status of the Pringle Bill (AB 2109) As of this meeting, the bill has not gone to the Appropriations Committee. However, Speaker Pringle has indicated that he would like it out of Committee and to the assembly by the end of May. Mr. Pringle has also indicated that the bill will be changed if responsible alternatives are presented to him. The Steering Committee directed staff to maintain contact with Mr. Pringle's office on this issue. Districts' staff should be educating city councils on the issue by asking them to support the general concept of evaluating agencies to see if consolidation is feasible. A letter will be prepared to all cities and Assemblyman Pringle for the Joint Chairs signature addressing our efforts and concerns. Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting Page 3 May 22, 1996 (b) Status of Orange County Council of Governments (COG) Sixteen cities have committed to the Council of Governments and three more are scheduled to take action this month. The County is undecided at this time. This program is the continuation of RAPC. When the Council is authorized, our Boards will be requested to take action on a Joint Powers Agreement. (c) Debriefing on Boards Workshops on the Strategic Plan and Results of Directors Survey Judy Wilson summarized the returns of the surveys. The Directors indicated that they appreciate the opportunity to participate. One suggestion was to consider a site tour of the outfall at the next workshop. A copy of the results is attached to these minutes. (d) Role of the Steering Committee The Steering Committee will be included in the preparation of the agenda for the next workshop, tentatively scheduled for September. (e) Agenda Items to be Presented to Committees in June The budget presentations will be made to all committees in June. The PDC Committee will be touring the Plant 2 facilities before their meeting. Director Swan indicated that an equipment expenditures list should be included as part of the budget review process. He also questioned the disposal of surplus lab equipment. Staff is preparing list recommending disposal options for the equipment. Director Swan also suggested that staff consider contracting out the lab and the equipment, or determine the value of the equipment and either sell it or donate it. This is an asset that should be managed- (7) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting Page 4 May 22, 1996 (8) OTHER BUSINESS There was no other business discussed. (9) MATTERS TO BE REPORTED AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING- There were no matters to be reported on at a subsequent meeting. (10) MATTERS ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT There were no matters for a future agenda. (11) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next meeting has been scheduled for June 26, 1996 at 5:30 p.m. (12) ADJOURNMENT The Steering Committee adjourned at approximately 6:43 p.m. Submitted by: J n Tappan, S Bering Committee Secretary 11MTpC(.YMISIHLpAMNAM�V WjIlCB.MLV 4 Results of Director's Workshop Questionnaire January Workshop Jerry King of the Regional Water Quality Control Board was the guest speaker for our January workshop. His speech was followed by presentations by four staff members, Blake Anderson, "The Historical Perspective of Our Planning Efforts"; Nancy Wheatley, "The Ocean Discharge Permit 301 (h)Waiver"; Judy Wilson, "Changing Demographics"; and Dave Ludwin, "Strategic Plan Overview." Don McIntyre concluded the morning with an overview of the strategic policy issues. 1. Did you find this workshop valuable? Yes 8 No Comments 1. Good basis for understanding what is needed in the future. 2. This is the first"broad view" I have seen since I became a Board Member three years ago. Staff was innovative and well prepared. 3. It set a very positive tone for the meetings that were to follow. It was very informative and clearly demonstrated that staff were on top of the issues. 4. Helped put things in perspective. 5. A good idea—learning situation. It will get better. 6. A cross-section of the inner-workings of OCSD. 7. The more in-depth information received improves our knowledge and value as a Director representing a constituency. 2. Please rate the presentations: Jerry King Excellent 4 Good 4 Fair _ Poor _ "The Regional Perspective" Blake Anderson Excellent 6 Good 2 Fair _ Poor "The Historical Perspective of Our Planning Efforts" Nancy Wheatley Excellent 4 Good 4 Fair_ Poor_ 'The Ocean Discharge Permit 301 (h)Waiver" Judy Wilson Excellent 5 Good 3 Fair_ Poor_ "Changing Demographics" Dave Ludwin Excellent 5 Good 3 Fair_ Poor "Strategic Plan Overview" 3. Now could we have improved this workshop? Comments 1. More time for discussion. 2. For the first workshop, it was very good. 3. Include a Director in the planning. 4. The workshop did not need improving. 5. It would be very difficult! Nothing to add! 1 \p May Workshop Bill Mills of the Orange County Water District was our guest speaker, discussing the Orange County Water Reclamation Project. Following a brief overview of the projects comprising Phase I of the Strategic Plan, Paul Brown of the consulting group Camp, Dresser&McKee led a discussion on the plan's mission statement and critical success factors. The second half of the workshop was a panel discussion with staff members Blake Anderson, Judy Wilson and Dave Ludwin. Gail Lynch from Carollo Engineers and Kelli Bum-Lucht from Camp, Dresser& McKee were also on the panel. 1. Did you find this workshop valuable? Yes 6 No 4 Comments 1. Very informative as to relationship of Sanitation District and Water District. 2. It was very informative, and dealt with a topic that is very important and will become much more important...water reclamation. 3. Staff is working hard to communicate. 4. We did not have a good process on the"Mission Statement" and critical success factors. 5. 1 think this plan has to be done soon, the concept and where and how it is going is greatl 6. The more in-depth information received improves our knowledge and value as a Director representing a constituency. 2. Please rate the following: Bill Mills Excellent 3 Good 4 Fair _ Poor "OC Water Reclamation" Discussion on the Strategic Plan's Excellent 1 Good 2 Fair 3 Poor 6 Mission Statement and Critical Success Factors Panel Discussion Excellent 2 Good 4 Fair 1 Poor _ Blake Anderson Judy Wilson Dave Ludwin Gail Lynch Kelli Bum-Lucht 3. How could we have improved this workshop? Comments 1. 1 was concerned about Directors "resentment'of mission statement. I hope it doesn't glitch the plan to have Directors involved in future planning or feel it is staff doing planning that they simply satisfy. 2. 1 don't really care for the panel discussion format Would prefer to hear the issues and then to hear the staff present options and substantive analysis behind those options. 3. Too much time wasted on semantics regarding mission statement. 4. The consultant was a disaster. He caused a rift between staff and Directors. Very poorly presented —the order of the agenda was off. Mission statement very poorly presented — it felt adversarial. 5. The facilitator did not do a good job. Very difficult to involve such a large group in a discussion of the mission and critical success factors. He seemed bewildered. He repeated himself often and did not move on when he could have. People lost their focus and the attention span evaporated. 6. Why not media at workshop? People out there should have some idea of what is going to happen. Should know of plans and why it is being done! 7. Keep similar format! 2 Overall Program Evaluation 1. Are the workshops meeting your information needs? Yes 8 No _ Comments 1. We all need to better understand the Districts' responsibility to Orange County constituents. 2. Forces Directors to understand the issues and the challenges the Sanitation District faces. It also instills confidence in the Directors with regard to the abilities of the staff. 3. There is a lot to learn. 4. 1 think they are very important because they allow Directors to understand issues in greater depth. 5. Insight to the workings of the Districts on a hands-on level. 6. Enhances role as a Director. 2. Is Saturday morning the best time for you to attend a Board Workshop? Yes 8 No — Alternative days/times 1. Late afternoon would be OK. 2. Thursday evenings. 3. Our next Workshop will be in September when we will be presenting the initial results of our investigation of the ocean outfall. Do you have a suggestion for a format or type of presentation you would find most helpful? Suggestions 1. Assume that we don't know how it works and educate us. Then inform us of the issues and costs. Then give us the staffs recommendations and reasons for those suggestions. 2. You don't need a consultant. Questions and answers always work well after presentation. Repeat trip to outfall opportunity. 3. This should be an easier presentation than the last because it does not involve so much subjectiveness as previous workshop. 4. Slides of what is down there and what has to be done to get to where we are going. 5. Visual as well as oral presentation! 4. Do you have any additional comments for improving Board Strategic Planning Workshops? 1. Somehow we need better attendance than the last meeting. 2. More opportunity for open discussion. 3. You might consider breaking the Directors into groups, giving each group a problem and having them present a solution. (Or some variation based on your objectives.) 4. 1 believe we are on the right track by having these workshops. The Sanitation District is too large and complex not to have them. Keep the presentation simple and don't assume too much! 5. Don't be so formal! We are used to study sessions and 'rolling up our sleeves" in a workshop setting. 6. Tell us your needs, goals, issues—We are part of the team, and are used to solving problems. 7. Other than the one workshop which was problematic, I think things are going well. 8. The format has been good each time. Very well done. Question time to focus more on what is being covered. Mr/cg J:%W POOMCOMMSECIBOSURVEY. 3 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING JUNE 26, 1996 Agenda Item (18)(b): Receive and Tile draft Operations, Maintenance, and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on June 5, 1996. Summary These minutes will follow under separate cover. JAW PDOCSSWOB6UUN9M.18B JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING JUNE 26, 1996 Agenda Item (18)(C): Consideration of Resolution No. 96-55, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Purchase of Natural Gas, Specification No. P-170,to Pan Energy Trading and Market Services, Inc.,for the discount price of$.022/MMBTU,for a two-year period beginning August 1, 1996,with provision for two one-year or one two-year renewal(s) (Estimated annual cost$660,700.00 plus transportation costs of$248,300.00 for total annual cost of$909,000.00) (OMTS96-012). Summary The Districts use natural gas to fuel the Central Power Generation Systems (CGS) facilities. Natural gas is required because digester gas production is insufficient to produce all of the Districts' power needs. The current natural gas marketing contract will expire on July 31, 1996. The Districts have saved $126,356 during the first nine months of Fiscal Year 1995-96 by using a natural gas marketer versus purchasing natural gas from Southern California Gas Company (Gas Company). Staff solicited proposals from marketers for the purchase of natural gas in order to continue receiving natural gas cost savings. The successful marketer will also provide fuel for the new Compressed Natural Gas Fueling Station. The Districts must also pay the Gas Company to provide infra-state transportation and metering services per contract through July 31, 1997. Staff estimates a total Central Generator natural gas consumption of 451,369 MMBTU (Million British Thermal Units) per year. In addition, the Districts anticipate using an additional 14,100 MMBTU per year of natural gas at the compressed natural gas facility. Four proposals were received on May 14, 1996. Proposers submitted prices based on one-year and two-year fixed price contracts, and one-year and two-year indexed cost contracts. The indexed costs are based on the nationally recognized Natural Gas Intelligence Index (NGI) price which vary depending on market conditions and fluctuations. The bids were compared based on projected usage and historical index pricing levels. The apparent low bid was based on the NGI Index price discounted $0.022/MMBTU for both the one and two year terms with an annual estimated cost of $660,700 plus transportation costs adding approximately $248,300 for a total cost for natural gas of $909,000. The high bid was based on the fixed price of$1.48/MMBTU with a projected annual cost of$668,025. Budaet Information The estimated annual cost associated with the low proposed option, including Intra-state transmission by the Gas Company is $909,000 per year. The slightly increased cost this year from last year is due to a projected lower availability of natural gas supplies. Districts' staff have recommended a budget of$890,900 for Fiscal Year 1996-97. Staff Recommendation Staff requests authorization to adopt Resolution No. 96-55, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Purchase of Natural Gas, Specification No. P-170, to Pan Energy Trading and Market Services, Inc., for the discount price of$.022/MMBTU, for a two- year period beginning August 1, 1996, with provision for two one-year or one two-year renewal(s). (Estimated annual cost of$909,000.00). OMTS Recommendation The OMTS Committee approves and supports staffs request to award contract for Purchase of Natural Gas, Specification No. P-170, to Pan Energy Trading and Market Services, Inc. for authorization to procure natural gas from a private marketer and supports the staff recommendation to award a contract as outlined above. JAWPDOCS&AGNUUN9B6.08C 'r May 17, 1996 a a MEMORANDUM TO: Robert J.Oaten, Director of Operations FROM: Marc Dubois,Contracts/Purchasing Manager SUBJECT: PURCHASE OF NATURAL GAS SPECIFICATION NO.P-170 Sealed bids were opened May 14, 1996,for the Purchase of Natural Gas,Specification No. P-170,for a two year period beginning August 1, 1996. Tabulation of bids is as follows: Normalized Company Annual Discount From Fixed Price Estimated NGI(2) Cost(1) TERM 1 Yr. 2 Yr. 1 Yr. 2 Yr. Pan Energy Trading&Market Services $660,700.00 $.022 $.022 No No Irvine, CA Quote Quote Amoco Energy Trading Corporation $663,500.00 $.0159 $.0160 $1.499 $1.549 Newport Beach,CA Can West Gas Supply U.S.A., Inc. $666,100.00 $0.01 $0.01 No No Vancouver, B.C. Quote Quote Coastal Gas Marketing Company $66B4O00.00 $.005 $.005 $1.48 $1.53 San Diego, CA (above NGI) (above NGI (1) Normalized cost does not include cost of transportation and is based on the lowest cost option from each vendor. (2) Natural Gas Intelligence Gas Price Index. (3) Bold indicates basis for lowest cost for each vendor. Staff recommends a contract be awarded to Pan Energy Trading and Market Services,for the purchase of natural gas,for a discount of$0.022 per Million British Thermal Units below the monthly Natural Gas Intelligence Index Price, for a two year period beginning August 1, 1996. The estimated annual market gas use of Central Generation and the Compressed Natural Gas facilities are 451,369 MMBTU per year,respectively. Provisions are in the specifications for one two-year contract extension periods. Approved: We he eby concur with the above recommendations: • �� all o�.�l �/ ! Y !�:�.. Katherine Yaresh Gary .Streedi Senior Buyer Director of Finance l'o rc Dubois Robert J. Oaten ontracts/Purchasing Manager Director of Operations G:=P\PURCH\H E-ER\GAS1 CSOOC 0 P.O.Box 8127 0 Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 0 (714)962-2411 r JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING JUNE 26, 1996 Agenda Item (I8)(d): Consideration of Resolution No. 96-56, approving Lease/Purchase Agreement with Scientific Utilization, Inc., to acquire a Sludge Arc Treatment System (Specification No. P-171) for performance testing of sludge destruction and methane gas production, for a total amount not to exceed $360,000.00 plus sales tax, for a five-year period, and authorizing Districts' termination of the agreement at any time without penalty (Annual cost not to exceed $72,000.00 plus sales tax) (OMTS96-012). Summary A pulse power Sludge Arc Treatment System from Scientific Utilization, Inc. (SUI) is being promoted as a means of reducing the Districts' treatment costs. It is claimed that pulse power treatment will increase the anaerobic digesters' efficiency in converting sludge to useful fuel gas, and it may reduce solids disposal costs through improved dewaterability of the digested material. Preliminary results from other publicly owned treatment works (POTWs) are encouraging, but they have been based on different types of digester feeds than are used at the Districts. An on-site test is the only way to evaluate the performance and cost/benefit of the equipment in actual Districts' operations. The pulse power system uses an electric arc to create a shock wave in the sludge being fed to a digester. The shock wave breaks open many of the cell walls of the microbes in the sludge, making these cell contents more susceptible to conversion to methane gas in the digester. The operating efficiency of the digester is increased, leading to greater fuel gas production and reduced amounts of waste solids to be handled. SUI's performance guarantees stipulate an 8% increase in the destruction of methane gas producing solids and a 25% increase in digester gas production per unit of solids destroyed. SUI provides no guarantees for a reduction in the amount of sludge generated. SUI has proposed a lease/purchase agreement that will allow the Districts to test the equipment adequately without making a long-term financial commitment. A standard 60-month lease/purchase agreement with equipment performance guarantees is being offered. The lease period will begin after 72 hours of successful operation of the unit. The performance guarantees must be met after two months of operation. In addition, SUI will allow the Districts to cancel the agreement for any reason without penalty. This provides the Districts with the flexibility of a monthly rental without requiring the higher monthly payments a rental would entail. Budget Information The equipment's purchase price of$270,000 financed for 60 months requires a monthly payment of approximately $6,400 (lax included), for a total contract value of$384,000. y However, since the agreement can be canceled by the Districts at any time, the actual cost commitment for a performance test period expected to last four months is approximately $26.000. If the test period is shortened or lengthened from four months, the actual cost commitment will vary accordingly. If the equipment meets its performance guarantees and if the units are installed to treat the digester feed at both plants, preliminary estimates of costs savings from reduced purchase of natural gas and biosolids disposal could exceed $900,000/year. This number is preliminary and a more refined estimate of the number of units that would be purchased and installation costs will be determined by the research. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the OMTS Committee recommend that the Boards of Directors approve a Lease/Purchase Agreement with Scientific Utilization, Inc., to acquire a Sludge Arc Treatment System for performance testing of sludge destruction and methane gas production, for a total amount not to exceed $360,000.00, plus sales tax, for a five-year period (annual cost not to exceed $72,000, plus sales tax), and authorizing Districts' termination of the agreement at any time without penalty. OMTS Committee Recommendation The OMTS Committee concurs with the recommendation of staff. J9wPDOC\BSIAGe UN9M.18D County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California P.O.Box 8127.108"Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF AD HOC COMMITTEE RE SPACE UTILIZATION STUDY Thursday. May 29. 1996, at 5:30 p.m. A meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13, and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Thursday, May 29, 1996, at 5:30 p.m. at the Districts' Administrative Office. (1) ROLL CALL Those present were as follows: AD HOC COMMITTEE: STAFF PRESENT: John Collins, PDC Comm. Chair Don McIntyre, General Manager John Cox David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair Don Griffin OTHERS PRESENT: Roger Christman, Coleman Caskey Architects Larry Chu, Coleman Caskey Architects (2) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments received. (3) APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the January 4, 1996 Ad Hoc Committee were approved as written. (4) REPORTS OF COMMITTEE CHAIR, GENERAL MANAGER, AND DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING The Director of Engineering gave a brief status report on various projects of interest to the Ad Hoc Committee. w Minutes of Ad Hoc Committee Re Space Utilization Study Page 2 May 29, 1996 Restoration of Old Laboratory for Human Resources The design has been completed and is on the agenda for the June PDC Committee Meeting for approval of plans and specifications; tentative bid date is July 23, 1996. The construction will be complete, allowing for move in, in December 1996. Information Technology Trailers The trailers are under construction and will be installed by August 1, 1996, Move in should be by mid-August. Safety Offices in Building 5 The design is complete and we are scheduled to receive bids by end of June 1996. Construction should be complete, allowing for move in, in September 1996. Warehouse at Plant No. 2 The improvements to existing warehouse are under design. The construction of the improvements is scheduled to be complete by this winter. Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2 This project is under construction at this time. (5) STATUS OF REPORT ON DISTRICTS' OFFICE SPACE UTILIZATION STUDY. JOB NO. J38-1 The Director of Engineering gave a brief introduction of the project, and then introduced Roger Christman of Coleman Caskey Architects. Mr. Christman gave an overview of the project and the current status, relative to tasks and budget. After discussion, the Ad Hoc Committee decided that the study should continue to follow the original Scope of Work. The study will result in a document that establishes design and operational philosophy for utilization of the existing space, makes recommendations for future space use and standards, develops a potential phasing of improvements, and accommodates future redeployment of staff. The Ad Hoc Committee decided to meet with Coleman Caskey Architects on June 11, 1996 to discuss the data collected to date including organizational relationships and utilization of existing facilities, and to make recommendations for office standards, and future accommodation for staffing changes. Minutes of Ad Hoc Committee Re Space Utilization Study Page 3 May 29, 1996 (6) NEW AND MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS No new business was discussed. (7) OLD BUSINESS No old business was discussed. (8) OTHER BUSINESS, IF ANY No other business was discussed. (9) NEXT MEETING The next Ad Hoc Meeting is scheduled for June 11, 1996 at 5:30 p.m. (10) ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 6:45 p.m. / Gail Cain Committee Secretary DAL:gc J9W PDOC%DHOC96WAY'D529%.MIN County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California P.O.Box 8127.10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF AD HOC COMMITTEE RE SPACE UTILIZATION STUDY TUESDAY, JUNE 11, 1996, AT 5:30 P.M. A meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13, and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Tuesday, June 11, 1996, at 5:30 p.m. at the Districts' Administrative Office. (1) ROLL CALL Those present were as follows: AD HOC COMMITTEE: STAFF PRESENT: John Collins, PDC Comm. Chair Don McIntyre, General Manager John Cox David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair Mike Peterman, Director of Human Resources ABSENT OTHERS PRESENT: Don Griffin Roger Christman, Coleman Caskey Architects (2) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments received. (3) APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the May 29, 1996 Ad Hoc Committee were approved as written. (4) REPORTS OF COMMITTEE CHAIR, GENERAL MANAGER, AND DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING No reports were given. Minutes of Ad Hoc Committee Re Space Utilization Study Page 2 June 11, 1996 (5) STATUS OF REPORT ON DISTRICTS' OFFICE SPACE UTILIZATION STUDY, JOB NO. J-38-1 The Director of Engineering gave a brief introduction of the project, and then introduced Roger Christman of Coleman Caskey Architects. Mr. Christman presented information on existing and proposed office space standards, employee office space needs, existing building space usage and configuration, and existing organizational relationships. After discussion, the Ad Hoc Committee concurred with the information presented and agreed with the preliminary recommendations as presented. The Ad Hoc Committee decided to meet in four weeks for presentation by Coleman Caskey Architects, Inc. regarding alternative space utilization concepts, including use of existing permanent and interim facilities, and requirements for existing and future permanent facilities. (6) NEW AND MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS No new business was discussed. (7) OLD BUSINESS No old business was discussed. (8) OTHER BUSINESS, IF ANY No other business was discussed. (9) NEXT MEETING The next Ad Hoc Meeting will be scheduled to be held in approximately four weeks. (10) ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 7:00 p.m. ail Cain Committee Secretary DAL:gc JAWPOOCW.DHOCWUUNH 11 MWIN County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California P.O.Box 8127.10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE THURSDAY, JUNE 6, 1996 Tour began at 5:30 p.m. PDC Committee Meeting began at 6:45 p.m. Before the regularly scheduled PDC Committee Meeting, a tour was conducted of the Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1 (Jab No. P1-36-2). A regular meeting of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13, and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Thursday, June 6, 1996, at the Districts' Administrative Office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was taken and a quorum declared present, as follows: Planning, Design and Construction Committee: Staff Present: Present: Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager David Ludwin, Director of Engineering John Collins, Chair Gary Streed, Director of Finance John C. Cox, Jr. Ed Hodges, Director of GSA Walter K Bowman Mike Peterman, Director of Human Shirley Dettloff Resources Don Griffin John Linder, Construction Manager Barry Hammond Paul Mitchell, Design Manager Margie Rice Sheldon Singer Peer Swan Others Present: Charles Sylvia Mary Lee, Carollo Engineers Absent Barry Hammond Bob Zemel Minutes of Planning, Design and Construction Committee Meeting Page 2 June 6, 1996 (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments received. (4) APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF MAY 2 1996 MEETING The minutes of the May 2, 1996 Planning, Design and Construction Committee Meeting were approved as written. (5) REPORTS OF COMMITTEE CHAIR, GENERAL MANAGER, ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER, DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING, AND GENERAL COUNSEL (a) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR No report was given. (b) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager gave a brief update on the Pringle Bill, which concerns the consolidation of special Districts. The General Manager's report was followed by a more lengthy report by the Chair of the Boards, John C. Cox, Jr., which included discussion from the Committee members. (c) REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER No report was given. (d) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING The Director of Engineering gave an update on the Slater Avenue Pump Station construction. The contractor is working on the pipe connections in the street in an effort to open the street to full traffic as soon as possible. The Director of Engineering also reported on the status of the Coastal Permit for replacement of the Surge Tower at Plant No. 2. (e) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL No report was given. f Minutes of Planning, Design and Construction Committee Meeting Page 3 June 6, 1996 (6) STAFF OVERVIEW OF DISTRICTS' PLANNING. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES (a) Status Report on Jobs within the Plants and the Districts by the Director of Engineering This was covered in Section 5(d) above. (7) OLD BUSINESS, IF ANY None. (8) ACTIONS RE PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTS (a) Monthly Change Order Report by Director of Engineering on Change Orders approved by the General Manager, Planning, Design and Construction Committee, and Joint Boards. The Construction Manager discussed the Change Orders listed on the report, particularly Change Order No. 10 for Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-2, which was approved by the General Manger. (b) Action Items PDC96-19: Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications to Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36-2, authorizing a no-cost addition to the contract with Margate Construction, for adding a "Value Engineering Clause." The Director of Engineering explained the Change Order. This item can be approved by the PDC Committee per Resolution No. 95-9. It was moved, seconded, and carried to approve this item. PDC96-20: Consideration of Resolution No. 96- , approving plans and specifications for Main Sewage Pump (MSP) No. 3 Drive at Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-33-2, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids (Tentative bid date is July 23, 1996). The Director of Engineering gave a slide presentation which included scope of project, benefits, cost, and schedule. After some discussion, it was moved, seconded, and carried to recommend approval of this item. Minutes of Planning, Design and l Construction Committee Meeting Y Page 4 June 6, 1996 PDC96-21: Consideration of Resolution No. 96- , approving plans and specifications for Restoration of Old Laboratory for Human Resources, Job No. J-11-2, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids (Tentative bid date is July 23, 1996), The Director of Engineering gave a slide presentation and an overview of the project and the request to approve plans and specifications, and to establish a fund of$575,000 for the project. After a lengthy discussion of project elements which were presented for the first time, the Committee requested more detailed information in table form so that project costs could be more easily considered at the next PDC Committee Meeting. It was moved, seconded, and carried to recommend approval of the plans and specifications. It was also moved seconded, and carried to limit expenditures for the project to $55,000 for design, permitting, asbestos removal, and termite extermination. PDC96-22: Consideration of the following actions relative to Compressed Natural Gas Refueling Station, Job No. Pl-51: (1) Approve Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for said project, making miscellaneous modifications and clarifications. (2) Recommend to the Boards Resolution No. 96- to receive and file bid tabulation, and award of contract for Compressed Natural Gas Refueling Station, Job No. P1- 51 to Nova Automation, Inc. in the total amount of $695,000.00. The Director of Engineering gave an overview of this project and the request to approve Addendum No. 1, and award the construction contract. The Director of General Services presented factors which caused the estimated project cost to increase, and presented data reflecting the project payback period under various assumptions. The Committee requested that the cost data be presented in table form, and that the payback data be included in the Board agenda package. It was moved, seconded, and carried to recommend approval of this item. (9) ADDENDA TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS None to report. (10) NEW PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS None to report. Minutes of Planning, Design and Constriction Committee Meeting Page 5 June 6, 1996 (11) CONSIDERATION OF NEW AND MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS FAHR96-36: Consideration of report from Don McIntyre and staff on the proposed 1996-97 budgets to be considered by the Finance Administration and Human Resources Committee, and the Joint Boards of Directors at their June 1996 meeting. (Information Only Item). The General Manager gave a slide presentation on the proposed 1996-97 Budget. (12) CLOSED SESSION The Chair determined that there was no need for a closed session. (13) OTHER BUSINESS, IF ANY None. (14) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING None. (15) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT There were no matters discussed. (16) NEXT MEETING (a) Joint Boards of Directors Meeting—Wednesday, June 26, 1996, at 7:30 p.m. (b) Planning, Design and Construction Committee Meeting — Thursday, July 11, 1996, at 5:30 P.M. (c) Joint Boards of Directors Meeting — Wednesday, July 24, 1996, at 7:30 p.m. (17) OTHER ANNOUNCEMENTS. IF ANY Although scheduled to be dark, it was agreed upon that there should be a PDC Committee Meeting in August. Minutes of Planning, Design and Construction Committee Meeting Page 6 June 6, 1996 (18) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 9:00 p.m. 4 X- Gail A. Cain Planning, Design and Construction Committee Secretary J:�wvuocWDOMuHwco MN JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING JUNE 26, 1996 Agenda Item (20)(c): Consideration of Resolution No. 9657, approving plans and specifications for Main Sewage Pump (MSP) No. 3 Drive at Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1, Job No. J43-2, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids (Tentative bid date is July 23, 1996) (PDC96-20). Summary In June 1995,the Directors awarded a Professional Services Agreement to Carollo Engineers for the design of the Main Sewage Pump(MSP)No.3 Drive at Headworks No.2 at Plant No.1. Pump No. 3 was installed without a drive system in the original headworks construction project in 1989. This project will provide redundancy and reliability improvements at the headworks by making Pump No.3 operational as a standby pump. Major project elements include installation of the new electric motor drive,solid state motor controller, and related modifications to the plant electrical distribution system. The plans and specifications are now complete and ready for bidding. The tentative bid date is July 23, 1996. Intense rainstorms in December of 1992 produced some of the highest flows ever through the plants. All four of the existing Plant 1 roadworks pumps were required to handle the flows. This gave indication that the headworks did not have the standby capacity necessary H one pump were out of service. The key to keeping our treatment plants operating and to avoiding sewage spills during emergency situations is system reliability. Carollo Engineers,in the report entitled Evaluation of Hydraulic Reliability and Standby Power Requirements,Job Nos.J-33 and J-34,recommended several enhancements of system reliability at Plant Nos. 1 and 2. The enhancements are now being implemented in this project and in other construction projects; J-33-1 (standby power system Improvements,power monitoring and load management system installation), and J-34-1 (ocean outfall reliability upgrade). Considering potential future rainstorm conditions,staff believes that the Districts should proceed with implementation of the J-33-2 enhancements since delay in the installation of Drive No.3 may jeopardize Plant No. 1 pumping capability during high flow situations. Budget Information This project was combined with other electrical reliability projects In the 19951996 CORF budget with a total project estimate of$14.575,000. The latest total project estimate for Main Sewage Pump(MSP) No.3 Drive at Headworks No.2 at Plant No. 1,Job No .J-33-2, is$920.000. The expenditures to date are$170,000 for design. The engineer's estimate for the construction of the project is$680,000. Construction administration and Inspection is estimated to be an additional$70,000. This project will be included in the 1996-1997 and 1997-1998 budgets. Staff Recommendation Consideration of Resolution No.98-57 approving plans and specifications for Main Sewage Pump(MSP) No. 3 Drive at Headworks No.2 at Plant No. 1,Job No.J-33-2,and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids(Tentative bid date is July 23, 1996). PDC Committee Recommendation The PDC Committee concurs with the recommendation of staff. JS:jmf:gc J WPo0CSswG9VJUN96\620C JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING JUNE 26, 1996 Agenda Item (20)(d): Consideration of the following actions relative to Restoration of Old Laboratory for Human Resources Department, Job No. J-11-2 (PDC96-211: (1) Consideration of Resolution No. 96-58, approving plans and specifications for Restoration of Old Laboratory for Human Resources Department, Job No. J-11-2, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids (Tentative bid date is July 23, 1996). (2) Consideration of motion authorizing an amount not to exceed $55,000.00 for design, permitting, asbestos removal and termite extermination costs re said project. Summary The summary and budget information presented below have been revised from that originally presented to the PDC Committee to reflect the discussion at the meeting and the direction given by the Directors to clarify the information. The Human Resources Department is housed in trailers that were purchased used in 1988. A project began in 1988 to provide permanent facilities for the Human Resources Department has led to the present Ad Hoc Committee Re Space Utilization Study. The Space Utilization Study is unlikely to provide permanent space for the Human Resources Department prior to 1998. The existing trailer complex has deteriorated and the Human Resources Department has grown. Temporary relocation of the Safety Division, now underway, while helping to relieve the crowding, will not provide adequate space for the remaining staff. Staff evaluated purchasing a new trailer complex verses restoring the Old Laboratory and using it as office space for the Human Resources Department. Staff had cost estimates prepared for both alternatives and presented the alternatives to the Ad Hoc Committee Re Space Utilization for their recommendation on January 4, 1996. The cost of both alternatives was approximately $330,000. The Ad Hoc Committee recommended establishing a fund of$375,000 for restoring the Old Laboratory and authorizing the General Manager to award a Professional Services Agreement for the restoration design in an amount not to exceed $30,000. The same evening, the Planning, Design and Construction Committee approved the Ad Hoc Committee recommendation. A Professional Services Agreement was awarded to GKK Corporation for an amount not to exceed $24,790 for the preparation of plans and specifications for the Restoration of Old Laboratory for Human Resources Department, Job No, 1-11-2, An addendum approved by the General Manager under his delegated authority increased the authorized fees for design cost to $32,555 and added $2,200 for reimbursement of city fees. The plans and specifications are now complete and ready for bidding. The tentative bid date is July 23, 1996. Budget Information Design costs are now determined to be $32,555 and construction is estimated at $362,870. This includes exterior landscaping, a building security system, and parking lot improvements which were identified during design as necessary and not included in cost estimates previously presented to the Directors. The January 1996 reports to the Committees and Boards included only design and construction costs and were intended to provide a basis for choosing between new trailers and remodeling the old laboratory. Costs common to both options were not presented. The following table includes those common costs (furnishing and moving expenses) and other miscellaneous costs related to the project. As directed by the PDC Committee, the estimated costs shown below for termite extermination, furnishings, and moving expenses are updated with more accurate estimates than previously presented to the Committee. Description Original Authorized Additional Total Budget to Date Authorization Authorization Requested Design Consultant 30,000 32,555 -0- 32,555 City Permit -0- 2,200 -0- 2,200 Construction Contractor 345,000 -0- 362,870 362,870 Asbestos/Demolition 150,000 150,000 (133,000) 17,000 Termite Extermination -0- -0- 4,500 4,500 Damage Repair -0- -0- 15,000 15,000 Furnishings -0- -0- 80,000 80,000 Moving and Hook-up -0- -0- 10,000 10,000 Administration and -0- -0- 40,000 40,000 Inspection TOTAL 525,000 184,755 379,370 564,125 Termite infestation was discovered during design and the estimate for extermination is based on three phone quotations. The termite damage repair estimate is a contingency value. A more accurate estimate will be available after the termite inspection and will be presented to the PDC Committee. The estimate for furnishings is based upon estimates for similar mid-priced configurations. The Purchasing Department will coordinate the furnishings purchase and the possible reuse of existing furniture if feasible. The estimated cost for the relocation and hook-up of existing computers, phones, and power is by utilizing staff. Administration and inspection is budgeted at approximately 7.6% of construction costs based on previous experience. This project was not included in the 1995-1996 budget. The Boards of Directors authorized $375,000 which was funded from the Plant 2 Warehouse Building, Jab No. 132-35-2, in the 1995-1996 budget. The design and construction costs intended to be covered by the $375,000 fund are now estimated at $395,425. Staff has issued purchase orders (originally estimated at $150,000) for the demolition and removal of the laboratory casework and fume hoods, asbestos removal, and asbestos consultant totaling $17,000. Not included in the authorized $375,000 budget were termite extermination, city permit, office furnishings, moving expenses and project administration and inspection. In August, staff will present to the PDC Committee for their approval, the bid results and updated project costs. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends consideration of the following actions relative to the Restoration of Old Laboratory for Human Resources, Job No. J-11-2 , as follows: 1. Consideration of Resolution No. 96-58, approving plans and specifications for Restoration of Old Laboratory for Human Resources, Job No. J-11-2, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids (Tentative bid date is July 23, 1996). 2. Consideration of motion authorizing a fund of$575,000 for design, construction, contract administration and miscellaneous expenses. PDC Committee Recommendation The PDC Committee recommends the following actions: 1. Consideration of Resolution No. 96-58, approving plans and specifications for Restoration of Old Laboratory for Human Resources, Job No. J-11-2, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids (Tentative bid date is July 23, 1996). 2. Consideration of motion authorizing an amount not to exceed $55,000 for design, permitting, asbestos removal and termite extermination costs re said project. JD:jmf:gc:pk JAW PDOC1SS1AGWU❑N9 .YJD County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,Callrornia P.O.Box 8127.10844 Ellis Avenue ' Fountain Valley,CA 92728A727 Telephone: (714)962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE Wednesday. June 12, 1996, 5:30 P.M. A meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on June 12, 1996 at 5:30 p.m., at the Districts' Administrative Offices. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: Committee Directors Present: Staff Present: George Brown, Chair Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager John C. Cox, Jr., Joint Chair Judith A. Wilson, Assistant General Manager Jan Debay Ed Hodges, Director of General Services Admin. Burnie Dunlap David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Thomas Saltarelli Bob Dolan, Director of Operations & Maintenance William G. Steiner Mike Peterman, Director of Human Resources Wally Linn Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications Mahin Talebi, Source Control Manager Committee Directors Absent : Steve Kozak, Financial Manager Mike White, Controller James Flora Linda Eisman, Training Manager John M. Gullixson Brad Cagle, Principal Financial Analyst-Budget Roger R. Stanton, Vice Chair Lenora Crane, Committee Secretary Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair Others Present: Others Present Tom Woodruff, General Counsel None Dennis Vlasich, Kerry Consulting Group Don McLean, Robert F. Driver Co. (2) APPOINTMENT OF A CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS No comments were made. v Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 2 June 12, 1996 (4) REPORTS OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR. GENERAL MANAGER. ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER(S). DIRECTOR OF FINANCE/TREASURER, DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES, DIRECTOR OF GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNICATIONS AND GENERAL COUNSEL (a) Report of the Committee Chair The Committee Chair had no report. (b) Report of the General Manager Don McIntyre briefly reported to the Committee on several important items: • This week all of the Districts' bargaining units have agreed to the health plan which had been approved by the Joint Boards at their last meeting. • Director John Collins underwent back surgery today, and has come through the operation successfully. He will be discharged from the hospital tomorrow. • SAWPA'S board has approved our agreement and will now move on to five agencies for their individual ratification. • A paragraph will be added to the letter to the Board scheduled to come out next week regarding the Districts' involvement in the Bolsa Chica beach closure issue. (c) Report of Assistant General Manager- Administration The Assistant General Manager of Administration Judy Wilson announced two personnel changes: • Mike Peterman has been permanently appointed the Districts' Personnel Director, effective last Friday, June 7, 1996. Mike competed in a very strong pool of candidates and did very well. • The resignation of Steve Hovey, Information Technology Manager, has been accepted by the Districts. We will be recruiting to fill that vacant position. Judy further reported that Linda Eisman, Training Manager, has just completed and distributed the Districts' first annual Training Calendar. Linda Eisman advised that she is working with the Safety Program Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 3 June 12, 1996 Manager to define safety requirements. Some of the dates for those training sessions will be added to the calendar later and redistributed. Report of Assistant General Manager . Operations The Assistant General Manager of Operations had no report. (d) Report of the Director of Finance/Treasurer The Director of Finance/Treasurer's written report was contained in the agenda package. Steve Kozak, Financial Manager, reviewed the report for the Committee. He indicated that at the time our report was prepared, the variable rates were traded at 4.7%, which was at end of the month. Today we were down between 3.10% and 3.15%. (e) Report of the Director of Human Resources The Director of Human Resources had no report. (f) Report of the Director of General Services Administration The Director of General Services Administration had no report. (g) Report of the Director of Communications Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications, reported that tomorrow evening the first public participation meeting will be held regarding the Districts' Strategic Plan. Staff has sent out over 1,300 invitations, the press has been notified and Public Notices have been placed in the Register, Times and Orange County Business Journal. The meeting will be held in the Multi-Purpose Room at McGarvin Middle School, on Thursday, June 13, 1996, between 5:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. Approximately 150 people are expected to attend. (g) Report of General Counsel General Counsel Tom Woodruff reported on the Pringle Bill consolidation effort. There is a good chance that sanitation will not be part of the bill. Mr. Woodruff also updated the Committee on recent meetings by water agencies and the outcome of those meetings. Changes and specific amendments are being proposed to AB2109. The next hearing on the bill is set for July 3 before the Local Government Committee. Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 4 June 12, 1996 (5) APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the draft minutes of the May 8, 1996, meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee. (Please Note: Though the following items may have been acted on in another sequence, the minutes will reflect them in numerical order for tracking purposes.) (6) OLD BUSINESS FAHR96.29 Consideration of motion to approve renewal of the Districts' All-Risk Property Insurance Program for 1996-97, including earthquake, flood, personal property and business interruption coverage with: a $200 million All-Risk limit: a $30 million earthquake sub-limit, with deductibles of$25,000 for all perils except earthquake, and 5% per unit ($250.000 min.)for earthquake, for a total premium not to exceed $1.4 million. Steve Kozak, Financial Manager, noted that this item was originally presented to the Committee on May 8, 1996. A status report and additional information requested by the Committee is being presented tonight. Mr. Kozak introduced Don McClean of Robert F. Driver Company, the Districts' current Broker-of- Record. Mr. Kozak reviewed Mr. McClean's aggressive marketing efforts to obtain All-Risk Insurance at the not-to-exceed $1.4 million premium cost authorized at the last meeting. Mr. Kozak reviewed the 1995-96 Schedule of Insurance Companies, Premiums, Commissions and Fees. Premium reductions will be about 9.5%. Mr. Kozak noted that additional confirmations are expected over the next few days, and insurance is expected to be in place for the next fiscal year. It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to approve staffs recommendation. (7) NEW BUSINESS FAHR96.35 Consideration of motion to receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of April 1996. The month ended April 1996 Performance Monitoring Reports for Liquid and Long-term Operating Monies indicated that total investments amount to $386,761,323. Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 5 June 12, 1996 Steve Kozak reported that in addition to the above information presented each month, the Districts has gone on-line with Mellon Trust, our custodial services bank for our investment program. We are now able to present the Committee with actual portfolio consolidation statements without delay. The Committee will also receive the historical cost of the portfolio and the market value from both PIMCO, our investment manager, and Mellon Trust. Variations will occur at the close of the month due to pending trades, slightly different methodologies and evaluation methods. FAHR96.36 Consideration of motion recommending approval of the proposed 1996.97 Joint Works Budgets and forwarding them to the Joint Boards as follows: Joint Works Operating/Working Capital $48,700,000 Worker's Compensation Self-Insurance 276,000 Public Liability Self-Insurance 385,000 Joint Works Capital Outlay Revolving 44,895,000 This item was reported on by both General Manager Don McIntyre and Controller Mike White, with both utilizing a computerized slide system for their visual presentations. Mr. McIntyre advised that the proposed budget has been presented to the PDC and OMITS Committees. If the 1996-97 proposed budget is approved by the FAHR Committee, the entire budget, including the individual Districts, will be forwarded to the Joint Boards for consideration at their June 26, 1996 meeting. Don McIntyre gave an overview of the proposed 1996-97 budget and identified two major changes in the Districts' organizational charting. Mr. McIntyre reviewed the proposed actions to reduce costs, such as cross-training, retraining for reassignments, attrition, early retirement incentives, etc. All vacant positions have been eliminated from the budget. Staffing is maximized at 624 for next year, and costs per MGD are expected to remain at $555. Mr. McIntyre further reported on the Districts' proposed actions to become more competitive, the Districts' critical goals, and reviewed budget charts identifying expected areas where money will be expended and where the revenue is to be derived. Mr. McIntyre advised that fees may have to be increased next year. Controller Mike White then gave an in-depth report of the Districts' 1996-97 Proposed Budget, going through each of the ten major sections of the budget and identifying new areas added to this year's budget. The Committee suggested that the various "reserves' be renamed or identified as earmarked for specific projects when next year's budget is prepared. It was also noted that a budget should be used as a guide. It does not necessarily have to be totally expended and, on the other hand, if it is not enough, staff should not be reluctant to come back with reasons why it should be increased. Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 6 June 12, 1996 The Chair suggested that those Committee members who have questions regarding specific areas in the budget contact staff directly. The Committee complimented staff for the excellent job they did preparing this year's proposed budget. After discussion on this item, it was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend that the Joint Boards of Directors approve the proposed Joint Works Operating, Joint Works Capital and Self-Insurance Fund Budgets for 1996-97. FAHR96-37 Consideration of motion to receive and file staff report regarding current commission-based compensation structure_ for Districts' Broker of Record. Steve Kozak stated that this item was first presented to the Committee at its May 8, 1996 meeting, and has been brought back this month with additional information. Mr. Kozak reviewed the annual compensation received by Driver Associates for each fiscal year since 1992-93. Mr. Kozak introduced Don McClean of Robert F. Driver Associates who described the current insurance market, and answered questions from the Committee regarding his company's commission structure. Mr. McClean advised that his company has two offices, and the staff that handled the Districts' health benefits package is not as efficient as his office which handles property and all-risk insurance. Mr. McClean made it clear that his company is more concerned about their reputation and providing continued services than about generating moderate increases in their premium income. As reported to the Committee in May, Mr. Kozak advised that staff is preparing a Request for Proposals (RFP) for insurance broker services. The RFP is being configured to allow firms to propose to provide services for liability, property, casual & miscellaneous insurance, and/or employee health insurance. The RFP will request firms to provide compensation proposals under both commission and flat fee structures. After discussion among the Committee members, it was moved, seconded and duly carried to receive and file this report. FAHR96-38 Consideration of motion to accept the Proposal submitted by J.D. Edwards; authorize staff to enter into negotiations with J.D. Edwards for a new financial information system:and to present a negotiated agreement, in an amount not to exceed $1,525 000 to the Joint Boards for approval at the July 24, 1996 meeting. Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 7 June 12, 1996 Mr. White introduced Dennis Vlasich of Kerry Consulting Group, the company selected to complete Phase III, Selection Process for the Finance Information System Hardware and Software; and Phase IV, Implementation and Acceptance of the Selected Hardware and Software Solutions. This item will complete Phase III in the FIS process. Mr. Vlasich gave a slide presentation of the process followed in acquiring the financial information system. He reviewed the lengthy RFP process which included two RFP releases, and the evaluation process. J.D. Edwards demonstrated all of the required computer module applications and was unanimously recommended by the evaluation team. Although J. D. Edwards was the second lowest priced vendor, they ranked number one when evaluating the three firms based on a price per functionality point system. J. D. Edwards is the most responsible vendor, has the most credible proposal and gave the best demonstration. After discussion, it was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve staffs recommendation. FAHR96-39 Consideration of motion to modify the Professional Services Agreement with Kerry Consulting Group to an amount not to exceed $47.757 for services rendered in performing Phase IV of the FIS Project. an increase of$23,567. to Provide for financial and human resources process and procedure reenaineering oversight not originally included in the scope of work. Mike White stated that Kerry Consulting Group is the company selected to complete Phases III and IV of the Financial Information System project. Phase III was the vendor selection process, which has just been concluded. Kerry Consulting will be working on Phase IV of the FIS project which is the implementation process. Recent site visits to review software installations revealed an opportunity to save significant staff costs in the future by reengineering the financial and human resource processes currently in place. Mr. White advised a change order in the amount of$23,567 to Phase IV of the Kerry Consulting Group contract is requested to accomplish this work. It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve staffs recommendation. FAHR96-40 Labor Negotiations - Information Only Mike Peterman, Director of Human Resources, reported on the status of the Request for Information and Qualifications (RFIQ) for a labor negotiator. He advised that bids were solicited from five firms with two firms responding by the Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 8 June 12, 1996 deadline (William Hamilton and Associates, and Liebert, Cassidy & Frierson). A third bid was received from William Avery after the close of bids. The selection process will take place on July 1, 1996, with the selection committee comprised of Don McIntyre, Ed Hodges, Bob Dolan, Michelle Tuchman and Mike Peterman. Mr. Peterman advised that labor contract proposals will be presented at the July FAHR Committee meeting in closed session. After discussion on this item, it was moved, seconded and duly carried to authorize staff to rebid this RFIQ with a five-day time frame for firms to resubmit bids. (8) CLOSED SESSION The Chair reported to the Committee the need for a closed session, as authorized by Government Code Sections 54957.6, to discuss and consider the items that are specified as Item (8)(b)(1)(a), (2) and (3) on the published Agenda. The Committee convened in Closed Session at 8:00 p.m. Confidential Minutes of the closed session held by the Committee have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. A report of actions taken will be publicly reported at the time the approved action becomes final re Agenda Item 8(b)(3). No action was taken re Agenda Item 8(b)(2). At 8:20 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session. It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the agreement reached among the General Manager and Director of Human Resources and all employee organizations, in accordance with the prior authority approved by the Boards of Directors. (9) OTHER BUSINESS, IF ANY None. (10) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING No reports were requested. (11) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT None. Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee ' Page 9 June 12, 1996 (12) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING DATES AND ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AT THOSE MEETINGS The next Committee meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, July 10, 1996. (13) ADJOURNMENT T.hwe _meJetinga dj was adjourned at approximately 8:22 p.m. Le ora Crane Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Secretary JAW PDOCTIMCRAN ETPC.MTGTAHR.96V 996.MINNFAHR6.96 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING JUNE 26, 1996 Agenda Item (22)(C): Consideration of motion to approve renewal of Districts' AII-Rtsk Property Insurance Program for 1996-97, including earthquake, flood, personal property and business interruption coverage with: a $200 million All-Risk limit; a $30 million earthquake sub4imit, with deductibles of$25,000 for all perils except earthquake, and 5% per unit($250,000 min.)for earthquake, for a total premium not to exceed $1.4 million (FAHR96-29). Summary At the Committee's May meeting, staff reported that the Districts' current All-Risk property insurance, inGuding fire, flood and earthquake coverage, expires at the end of June. Staff further reported that Robert F. Driver Associates, the Districts' Broker of Record, had made preliminary inquiries of the major All-Risk insurance carriers in anticipation of our renewal, and presented two renewal options for consideration by the Districts. The Committee selected Option "A,° and directed Robert F. Driver to maintain existing levels of property insurance coverage (i.e., $200 million All-Risk limit, with a $30 million earthquake sub- limit) at a premium similar to that of last year($1.37 to $1.4 million). The attached schedule presents summary information about the FY 1995-96 All-Risk insurance renewal cycle, including details on commission payments to Robert F. Driver Associates. The latest information from Driver regarding placement commitments with the carriers will be presented to the Committee at the meeting. Commission amounts can be expected to be similar to those of last year. The estimated premium cost for FY 1996-97 is $1.37 million. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee approve renewal of the Districts'All-Risk Property Insurance Program for 1996-97 including earthquake, flood, personal property and business interruption coverage, with a $200 million All-Risk limit, and a $30 million earthquake sub-limit, with deductibles of$25,000 for all perils except earthquake and 5% per unit ($250,000 min.) for earthquake, for a total premium not to exceed $1.4 million. FAHR Committee Recommendation to Joint Boards of Directors The FAHR Committee concurs with staffs recommendation. JAW PDOCtBS W GMUN956.= y JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING JUNE 26, 1996 Agenda Item (22)(d): Consideration of motion to receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of April 1996. FAHR96-35 Summary Both Pacific Investment Management Co., PIMCO, and Mellon Trust began their professional external management of our funds in September 1995. In order to give the Directors an opportunity to review the month-end reports available from PIMCO, and to avoid distribution at the meeting, reports from the prior month are included with the agenda. Quarterly presentations are made to the Committee by PIMCO and our third-party independent consultant, Callan Associates. The Investment Policy adopted by the Joint Boards on May 24, 1995, includes reporting requirements as listed down the PIMCO Monthly Report for the "Liquid Operating Monies'and for the 'Long-Term Operating Monies." All of the Investment Policy requirements are being complied with and performance to date exceeds the index rates. Historical cost and the current market values, "mark-to-market; are shown as estimated by both PIMCO and Mallon Trust. The slight differences are Caused by differing assumptions regarding marketability at the estimate date. Attached are schedules showing the detail and summary for both the short-term and long-term portfolio investments. Balances CSDOC ApN 30, 1995 State of Calif. LAF $ 19,209,049 Bank of America 1.908,757 PIMCO-Shod-tens Portfolio 51,893,683 PIMCO-Longterm Portfolio 280,224,589 Olsmct 11 GO Bond Fund 8,399 Debt Service Reserves @ Trustees 33,516,846 $386,761.323 Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the Committee receive, approve and forward this report to the Joint Boards. FAHR Committee Recommendation to Joint Boards of Directors The FAHR Committee recommends that the Joint Boards receive and file this report. JAW PDOC+BSWG98UUN968.22D June 26, 1996 CSDOC TOTAL CASH & INVESTMENTS 1995 - 1996 400 350 300 250 a 'S �200 2 150 f 100 50 0 June 30 July 31 Aug.31 Sept 30 Oct 30 Nov.30 Dec. 31 Jan.31 Fe6 29 Mar. 31 Apr.30 MONTHLY REPORT COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING& REPORTING 01or the month ending April 30, 1996) Liquid Operating Monies 14.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: • PIMCO $52,143,374 • Mellon $52,161,744 Historical Cost: $52 218 994 14.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: .10 Of Index: 25 14.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact in/loss of 1%Change: $52,143 .10% 14.1.4 REVERSE REPOS % of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: see attached schedule 00/0 14.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 82% 14.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: AAA 14.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING %of Portfolio Below "A": 0% 14.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" 14.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Portfolio Total Rate of Return: 1 Month: .44 3 Months: 1.31 12 Months: ------ Year-to-Date: 1.77 Index Total Rate of Return: 1 Month: .41 c�rceissnnwrnxavi�x'avAv.¢nun van MONTHLY REPORT COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING At REPORTING (for the month ending April 30, 1996) Long Term Operating Monies 14.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: PIMCO $279,155,927 • Mellon $279,640,896 IEstorical Cost: $282,838,191 14.1.2 MODERED DURATION Of Portfolio: 2.58 Of Index: 2.3 14.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact (gain/loss)of 1%Change: $7,202,222 2.580/6 14.1.4 REVERSE REPOS % of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: see attached schedule 00/U 14.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: NA 14.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: AAA 14.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING % of Portfolio Below "A": 0°/n 14.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" 14.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Portfolio Total Rate of Return: 1 Month: -.30 3 Months: -1.46 12 Months: ----- Year-to-Date: -.56 Index Total Rate of Return: LL 1 Month: _.11 abnn,cewew,xwvnaavurconvrvrwxwro MONTHLY REPORT COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 7NVESTMENTMANAGEMENTPROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING& REPORTING (for the month ending April 30, 1996) Liquid Operating Monies 14.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: • PIMCO $52,143,374 • Mellon $52,161,744 Historical Cost: $52 218 994 14.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: .10 Of Index: .25 14.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)of 1% Change; $52 143 .10% 14.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: see attached schedule 0% 14.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 82% 14.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: AAA 14.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0% 14.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" 14.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Portfolio Total Rate of Return: 1 Month: .44 3 Months: 1.31 12 Months: ------ Year-to-Date: 1.77 Index Total Rate of Return: 1 Month: .41 C:'91gCHL9PMMIIPDDCSVLWCO%YN.QDIPA.0.9D MONTHLY REPORT COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY INVESTMENTMANAGEMENTPROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING& REPORTING (for the month ending April 30, 1996) Long Term Operating Monies 14.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: • PIMCO $279,155,927 • Mellon $279,640,896 Historical Cost: $282,838,191 14.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 2.58 Of Index: 2.3 14.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact ain(loss) of 1% Change: $7,202,222 2.58% 14.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: see attached schedule 0% 14.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY % of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: NA 14.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Avera a Portfolio Credit Quality: AAA 14.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING % of Portfolio Below "A": 00/n 14.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" 14.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Portfolio Total Rate of Return: 1 Month: -.30 3 Months: -1.46 12 Months: ----- Year-to-Date: -.56 Index Total Rate of Return: I Month: -.11 c nsrrcewsmmwvnacswrMcaxvrvrara.wsn C OCS0000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED PORTFOLIO SUMMARY BY SECTOR BASE: USD 30-APR-1996 HB1100 t OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CORR PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAINAOSS ANNUAL INCOME YIELD ------------------------------ ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- ------- CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS CASH -1.43 -1.43 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 COMMERCIAL PAPER - DISCOUNT 21,797,187.75 21,797,157.75 6.57t 0.00 0.00 0.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE -LE 9,419,085.01 9,419,065.01 2.84t 0.00 0.00 0.00 FNMA ISSUES - LESS THN 1YR 11,653,544.99 11,653,544.89 3.51t 0.00 0.00 0.00 FED HM LOAN BNK - LESS THN IYR 3,051,473.82 3,051,473.81 0.92t 0.00 0.00 0.00 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK - LES 9,429,688.89 9,429,688.89 2.84t 0.00 0.00 0.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNTS 807,677.00 807,677.00 0.241r 0.00 30,287.89 3.75 CANADIAN GOVERNMENT SHORT TERM 6,375,807.58 6,375,807.58 1.92t 0.00 0.00 0.00 ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- ------- TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 62,534,463.50 62,534,463.50 18.85t 0.00 30,287.69 0.05 - FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S. GOVERNMENTS 91,326,196.85 90,048,340.00 27.14t -1,277,856.85 9,126,875.00 6.80 U.S. AGENCIES 134,518,625.00 132,049,312.00 40.04t -1,669,313.00 8,700,040.00 6.55 BANKING 6 FINANCE 29,677,836.61 29,657,966.55 8.94t -19,870.06 2,085,397.00 7.03 INDUSTRIAL 24,061,150.00 - 13.780,695.00 4.15t -280,455.00 1,202,250.00 8.72 ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- ------- TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 269,583,B08.46 266,336,313.55 80.27t -3,247,494.91 18,114,562.00 6.80 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLEVRECEIVABLES 2,931,962.51 2,931,662.51 O.BBt 0.00 0.00 0.00 ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- ------- TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 2,931,862.51 2,931,862.51 0.88t 0.00 0.00 0.00 .................. .................. ........ ................. ................ ....e.e NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 335,050,134.4; 331,802,639.56 100.00% 3,247,494.91 18,144,849.89 5.47 P.g. I OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED PORTFOLIO DETAIL BY SECTOR BASE: USD 30-APR-1996 HB1100 MARKET } OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CUR SHARES/PAR SECURITY DESCRIPTION PRICE MARKET VALUE TOTAL COST GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YLD --------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CASH 8 CASH EQUIVALENTS CASH 0 CASH 1.000 -1.43 0.00 -1.43 0.00 0.00 0.0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBTOTAL CASH -1.43 0.00 -1.43 0.00 0.00 0.0 COMMERCIAL PAPER - DISCOUNT 1,600,000 AMERICAN TEL 6 TL DISC 98.469 1,772,437.50 0.53 1,772,437.50 0.00 0.00 0.0 08/09/1996 5,000,000 AMERITECH CORP DISC 97.355 4,867,769.44 1.47 4,867,769.44 0.00 0.00 0.0 06/20/1996 900,000 AMOCO CO DISC 98.983 89D,847.50 0.27 890,847.50 0.00 0.00 0.0 06/13/1996 1,200,000 CANADIAN WHEAT BD DISC 98.640 1,183,665.33 0.36 1,183,685.33 0.00 0.00 0.0 07/10/1996 300,000 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 98.942 296,824.50 0.09 296,824.50 0.00 0.00 0.0 05/31/1996 700,000 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 96.644 690,506.25 0.21 690,506.25 0.00 0.00 0.0 06/26/1996 1,300,000 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 98.336 1,278,373.06 0.39 1,279,373.06 0.00 0.00 0.0 08/06/1996 1,100,000 MINNSTA MNG L MFG DISC 99.367 1,093,036.39 0.33 1,093,036.39 0.00 0.00 0.0 05/21/1996 500,000 PITNEY BONES CC DISC 99.027 495,132.50 0.15 495,132.50 0.00 0.00 0.0 06/14/1996 1,000,000 PITNEY BOWES CC DISC 98.787 987,872.78 0.30 987,872.78 0.00 0.00 0.0 07/22/1996 2,000,000 SOUTHWSTN PUB SVC DISC 99.392 1,987,836.67 0.60 1,987,936.67 0.00 0.00 0.0 05/20/1996 500,000 SOUTHWSTN PUB SVC DISC 99.465 497,325.00 0.15 497,325.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 05/03/1996 2,800,000 WAL MART STORES DISC 99.665 2,790,608.33 0.84 2,790,609.33 0.00 0.00 0.0 05/22/1996 3,000,000 WESTERN AUST TREY DISC 98.831 2,964,932.50 0.89 2,964,932.50 0.00 0.00 0.0 05/15/1996 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBTOTAL COMMERCIAL PAPER - DISCOUNT 21,797,187.75 6.57 21,797,187.75 0.00 0.00 0.0 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE -LESS THAN 1 YR Page 1.1 c OCBG000100 MELLON TRUST t CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED PORTFOLIO DETAIL BY SECTOR BASE: USD 30-APR-1996 HB1100 MARKET } OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CUR SHARES/PAR SECURITY DESCRIPTION PRICE MARKET VALUE TOTAL COST GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YLD ___ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 6,500,000 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC NYS 99.305 6,454,846.67 1.95 6,454,846.67 0.00 0.00 0.0 MAT US/29/1996 3,000,000 FHLMC DISC NTS 98.808 2,964,238.34 0.89 2,964,238.34 0.00 0.00 0.0 MAT 05/16/1996 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBTOTAL FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE 9,419,085.01 2.84 9,419,085.02 0.00 0.00 0.0 FNMA ISSUES - LESS THN IYR 1,80D,000 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 98.871 1,779,681.DD 0.54 1,779,681.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 06/14/1996 10,000,000 FEDERAL NATL MM ASSN DISC NTS 98.739 9,873,863.89 2.98 9,873,863.09 0.00 0.00 0.0 MAT 05/14/1996 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBTOTAL FNMA ISSUES - LESS THN IYR 11,653,544.89 3.51 11,653,544.89 0.00 0.0D 0.D FED HM LOAN BNK - LESS THN 1YR 3,100,000 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 98.435 3,051,473.81 0.92 3,051,473.61 0.00 0.00 0.0 MAT 08/12/1996 ---------------------------------------------------------------" SUBTOTAL FED HM LOAN BNK - LESS THN 3,051,473.81 0.92 3,OSI,473.81 0.00 0.00 0.0 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK - LESS THAN 1 YEAR 2,500,000 FEDERAL FARM CA BK CONS DISC 99.596 2,469,886.89 0.75 2,489,888.89 0.00 0.00 0.0 MAT 05/28/1996 7,000,000 FEDERAL FARM CR BK CONS DISC 99.140 6,939,800.00 2.09 6,939,800.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MAT 06/28/96 _____ --------------------- -------_--_-------____------- SUBTOTAL FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK - 9,429,688.89 2.84 9,429,689.89 0.00 0.00 0.0 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNTS 807,677 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 100.000 807,677.00 0.24 807,677.00 0.00 30,287.89 3.7 PUBLIC II ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBTOTAL BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUN 807,677.00 0.24 807,677.00 0.00 30,287.89 3.7 CANADIAN GOVERNMENT SHORT TERM 4,397,000 ALBERTA PROVINCE DISC 97.669 4,294,488.83 1.29 4,294,488.63 0.00 0.00 0.0 05/08/1996 2,100,000 CANADA GOVT DISC 99,110 2,081,318.75 0.63 2,081,318.75 0.00 0.00 0.0 06/03/1996 Page 2.1 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED PORTFOLIO DETAIL BY SECTOR BASE: USD 30-APR-1996 HB1100 MARKET % OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CUR SHARES/PAR SECURITY DESCRIPTION PRICE MARKET VALUE TOTAL COST GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YLD --------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBTOTAL CANADIAN GOVERNMENT SHORT T 6,375,807.58 1.92 6,375,807.58 0.00 0.00 0.0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL CASH L CASH EQUIVALENTS 62,534,463.50 18.85 62,534,463.50 0.00 30,287.89 0.0 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S. GOVERNMENTS 75,500,000 U S TREASURY NOTES 102.484 77,375,420.00 23.32 78,223,618.72 -848,198.72 5,379,375.00 6.9 07.125k 09/30/1999 DD 09/30/94 13,000,000 U S TREASURY NOTES 97.464 12,672,920.00 3.82 13,102,578.13 -429,658.13 747,500.00 5.9 05.7508 10/31/2000 DD 10/31/95 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBTOTAL U.S. GOVERNMENTS 90,048,340.00 27.14 91,326,196.85 -1,277,856.85 6,126,875.00 6.8 U.S. AGENCIES 10,000,000 FED NATL MTG ASSN MTN 95.687 9,568,700.00 2.88 9,593,750.00 -25,050.00 564,000.00 5.8 5.640% 02/20/2001 DO 02/20/96 39,600,000 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BOB 98.922 39,173,112.00 11.81 39,890,500.00 -717,388.00 2,570,040.00 6.5 6.490%- 09/13/2000 DO 09/13/95 15,000,000 FEDERAL HOME LN MM CORP DEBS 96.984 14,547,600.00 4.38 14,554,687.50 -7,087.50 898,500.00 6.1 5.990% 03/06/2001 DO 03/06/96 25,000,000 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG DEB 99.255 24,813,750.00 7.48 25,000,000.00 -186,250.00 1,680,000.00 6.7 6.720} 10/02/2000 DO 10/02/95 25,000,000 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEB 100.047 25,011,750.00 7.54 25,351,562.50 -339,812.50 1,712,500.00 6.8 6.850%- 05/26/2000 DO 05/26/95 20,000,000 FEDERAL NTAL MTG ASSN 98.672 19,734,400.00 5.95 20,128,125.00 -393,725.00 1,275,000.00 6.4 6.375% 10/13/2000 DD 30/10/95 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBTOTAL U.S. AGENCIES 132,849,312.00 40.04 134,518,625.00 -1,669,313.00 8,700,040.00 6.5 BANKING 6 FINANCE 1,500,000 CHRYSLER FINL MTN TR # 00201 101.564 1,523,460.00 0.46 1,534,950.00 -11,490.00 122,400.00 8.0 8.1604 01/31/1997 DO 01/11/95 465,000 CHRYSLER FINL MTN TR # 00224 101.607 472,472.55 0.14 475,972.61 -3,500.06 37,572.00 7.9 8.0803 01/31/1997 DD 01/31/95 1,500,000 CHRYSLER FINL MTN TR # 00258 101.287 1,519,305.00 0.46 1,522,140.00 -2,835.00 110,700.00 7.2 7.380t 03/17/1997 DD 03/03/95 2,900,000 CHRYSLER FINL MTN TR # 00306 101.641 2,947,589.00 0.89 2,952,896.00 -5,307.00 210,830.00 7.1 Page 3.1 OCBGO00100 MELLON TRUST CSOOC-CONSOLIDATED PORTFOLIO DETAIL BY SECTOR BASE: USG 30-APR-1996 HB1100 MARKET t OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CUR SHARES/PAR SECURITY DESCRIPTION PRICE MARKET VALUE TOTAL COST GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YLD _______________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 7.270! 04/13/1998 DD 04/13/95 1,000,000 CHRYSLER FINL MTN TR M 00335 99.655 996,550.00 0.30 993,160.00 3,390.00 62,600.00 6.2 6.260t 07/20/1998 DO 07/18/95 7,100,000 FORD MOTOR CR MTN TR E 00177 99.156 7,040,076.00 2.12 6,999,746.00 40,328.00 402,570.00 5.7 VAR/RT 03/30/1999 DO 03/30/94 4,000,000 FORD MTR CR MTN TRANCES ETR 96 100.599 4,023,960.00 1.21 3,970,460.00 53,480.00 243,200.00 6.0 FLTG/RT 12/09/1998 DO 11/08/93 3,000,000 G M A C MED TERM NTS 106.205 3,186,150.00 0.96 3,227,070.00 -40,920.00 258,750.00 8.1 8.625} 1/10/2000 DO 1/10/95 3,700,000 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP MTN TR00324 104.542 3,868,054.00 1.17 3,911,640.00 -43,586.00 309,875.00 8.0 6.3754 02/03/1999 DO 0/03/95 1,000,000 LEHMAN ERGS INC SR SUB NTS 100.644 1,006,440.00 0.30 1,007,520.00 -1,080.00 70,000.00 6.9 7.000% 5/15/1997 DO 5/27/94 2,000,000 SEARS DC CORP MTN SER II 102.520 2,050,400.00 0.62 2,050,400.00 0.00 180,000.00 8.7 9.000M: 08/01/1996 DO 08/01/91 1,000,000 SEARS ROEBUCK MTN K TR 00491 102.351 1,023,510.00 0.31 1,031,860.00 -8,350.00 76,900.00 7.5 7.690t 02/27/1999 DO 02/26/95 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBTOTAL BANKING 6 FINANCE 29,657,966.55 8.94 29,677,836.61 -19,870.06 2,085,397.00 7.0 INDUSTRIAL 1,500,000 CHRYSLER CORP DEB 104.735 1,571,025.00 0.47 1,603,320.00 -32,295.00 156,000.00 9.9 10.400% 08/01/2999 9,000,000 PHILIP MORRIS COS NT 107.718 9,694,620.00 2.92 9,903,780.00 -209,160.00 832,500.00 8.5 9.250% 02/15/2000 2,500,000 SEARS ROEBUCK 6 CO HT 100.602 2,515,050.00 0.76 2,554,050.00 -39,000.00 213,750.00 8.5 8.5504 08/01/1996 ____________________________________________________________________________ SUBTOTAL INDUSTRIAL 13,780,695.00 4.15 14,061,150.00 -290,455.00 1,202,2SO.00 8.7 ____________________________________________________________________________ TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 266,339,313.55 80.27 269,583,808.46 -3,247,494.91 18,114,562.00 6.6 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 0 INTEREST RECEIVABLE 1.000 2,931,862.51 0.06 2,931,862.51 0.00 0.00 0.0 ____________________________________________________________________________ SUBTOTAL PAYABLES/RECEIVABLE9 2,931,862.51 0,88 2,931,862.51 0.00 0.00 0.0 Page 4.1 OCS0000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED PORTFOLIO DETAIL BY SECTOR BASE: USD 30-APR-1996 HB1100 MARKET Y OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CUR SHARES/PAR SECURITY DESCRIPTION PRICE MARKET VALUE TOTAL COST GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YLD --------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------""----------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 2,931,062.51 0.88 2,931,B62.51 0.00 0.00 0.0 ....e...............e....................................................... NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 331,002,639.56 100.00 335,0SO,134.47 -3,247,494.91 18,144,049.99 5.4 Page 5.1 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING JUNE 26, 1996 Agenda Item (22)(e): Consideration of motion authorizing staff to enter into negotiations with J. D. Edwards for acquisition of new Financial Information System (Specification No. P-172) in an amount not to exceed $1,525,000.00,to be brought back to the Joint Board meeting of July 24, 1996 for approval (FAHR9638). Summary The process of acquiring a new financial information system began with the completion of the request for proposal (RFP) by Deloifte &Touche in October 1995. Kerry Consulting Group(KCG) was selected to complete Phase III, Selection Process for the Finance Information System Hardware and Software, and Phase IV, Implementation and Acceptance of the Selected Hardware and Software Solutions. After simplifying the RFP prepared by Deloitte &Touche, KCG released it to over 50 vendors on December 8, 1995. Proposals were due back to the Districts by January 18, 1996. Three vendors submitted proposals, of which only one was deemed to be complete. Staff made the decision to further revise the RFP and rerelease it. An initial screening RFP was released on February 12, and was due back to the Districts by March 19. Five vendors submitted initial proposals and committed the necessary resources in responding to the Secondary Disclosure, which was due on May 8. A computer evaluation team, consisting of 13 staff members representing the different software applications used throughout the Districts, was formed to further evaluate the vendor proposals by making on-site visits at other loral government installations. Site visits narrowed the field to three vendors. J.D. Edwards was the only vendor able to demonstrate all required computer module applications, and was the best solution of the three. On May 23, 1996, the Evaluation Team unanimously recommended J.D. Edwards. Although J.D. Edwards was the second lowest priced vendor, they did rank number one when evaluating the three firms based on a price per functionality point system. Budget Impact The proposed 1996-97 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund budget includes a total of$1,700,000 for a new FIS over the next two years. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Finance,Administration, and Human Resources Committee authorize staff authorizing staff to enter into negotafions with J. D. Edwards for acquisition of new Financial Information System (Specification No. P-172) in an amount not to exceed$1,525,000.00, to be brought back to the Joint Board meeting of July 24, 1996 for approval. FAHR Committee Recommendation to Joint Boards of Directors The FAHR Committee concurs with stairs recommendation. J+wvooaaswoesww 12e n June 12, 1996 STAFF REPORT FAHR96-38: Selection of Financial Information System History The existing financial information system was designed in 1977 and its useful life cycle has expired long ago. The current system has limited processing capability, a lack of disk storage space, a lack of corporate support for the operating system, and an inability to accommodate new users and applications. In Ernst & Young's review of the Districts' Finance Function in July 1995, no single issue arose more often than the limitations of the financial information system. In their report, Ernst & Young noted that the current system lacks key functionality including a report generator, on-line processing, and the ability to establish automated standard journal entries. KPMG Peat Marwick's Internal Control Report dated June 10, 1995, concluded that the Districts would benefit from an integrated financial information system that combined the Human Resource and Payroll functions. Such a system would eliminate duplication and ensure consistency of Human Resource and Payroll information. Their report also mentioned the need for an encumbrance system and a dynamic job cost accounting system that would allow for increased visibility of budgetary spending, and reduce the possibility of certain projects exceeding budgets. The formal process of acquiring a new financial information system began in February 1994 with a professional consulting agreement with Deloitte & Touche to perform a financial information needs assessment (Phase 1) and for the development of specifications for a formal request for proposal (Phase II). Upon the completion of the request for proposal (RFP) by Deloitte &Touche in October 1995, Kerry Consulting Group (KCG) was selected to complete Phase III, Selection Process for the Finance Information System Hardware and Software, and Phase IV, Implementation and Acceptance of the Selected Hardware and Software Solutions. KCG's assessment of the RFP prepared by Deloitte &Touche was that it was very thorough in identifying the functionality requirements of the new system. However, the 230 pages of narrative responses being required of the proposing FIS vendors was not vendor-friendly. KCG also pointed out that the FIS market is currently a seller's market CSDOC 0 P.O.Box 8127 0 Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 0 (714)962-2411 v FAHR96-38 Page 2 June 12, 1996 and vendors are responding only to those RFP's that require little time to complete and provide the highest probability of being selected. KCG, therefore, converted the Deloitte &Touche RFP from a narrative response format to an objective checklist response format in order to encourage participation. The RFP was released to over 50 vendors on December 8, 1995. with proposals due back to the Districts by January 18, 1996. About 10 vendors made inquiries on the RFP process but only one vendor actually made an on-site visit. By January 25, 1996, only three vendors submitted proposals of which only one was deemed to be complete. Staff and KCG were disappointed in the low number of proposals received. Two factors contributing to the low response were (1) the process was conducted over the Christmas and New Year Holidays; a time period where a lot of vendor account representatives were scheduled for vacations and; (2) the revised RFP was still too complex to entice responses from vendors. Staff and KCG were uncomfortable focusing in on only one FIS vendor. We believed that a higher number of responses would result in a better representation of what was currently available in state-of-the-art financial information systems. Staff then made the decision to extend the RFP deadline, and further simplify and reissue the RFP. The RFP was broken down into two components. The first component was issued as an initial screening, limited the number of functionality questions to the 20 most critical per financial module, and required that vendors only identify the recommended hardware platform configuration without committing to price. The secondary disclosure process required the answers to the remaining functionality questions and fixed pricing on the proposed hardware solution. The initial screening was released on February 12 and was due back to the Districts by March 19. Again, the initial RFP disclosure was issued to more than 50 vendors. About 12 vendors became actively involved in the process by either calling or making on-site visits. Five vendors submitted initial proposals and, after finding out that their chances of winning the award were now up to 20 percent, all committed the necessary resources in responding to the Secondary Disclosure, which was due on May 8. Of the five vendors submitting proposals, two withdrew during the site visitation phase of the process. The proposals of the three remaining vendors were deemed to be complete and consisted of: • J.D. Edwards and Company . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,385,874 • PeopleSoft . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2,314,538 • SCT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $681,458 FAHR96-36 Page 3 June 12, 1996 These three finalists were put through an extensive background check and were rated by: • Financials-Are they financially stable? Will they still be in business in 5 years? • Experience- Have they done projects of similar scope? • Proximity-Accessibility of resources to respond to problems? • Capacity-Are they over committed on other projects? Do they have time for us? • Commitment- Is local government financial systems their strategic product? • References- What do other installed sites say about them? • Supportability-Are they providing ongoing user support? The Evaluation Team A computer evaluation team consisting of 13 staff members representing the different software applications used throughout the Districts was formed to further evaluate the vendor proposals by making on-site visits to the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California in Los Angeles, the Southern California Water Company in San Dimas, and the City of Poway in San Diego County. These site visits were the focal point of the evaluation team's efforts. Their purpose was to obtain answers to the following questions: • Were the other local governments pleased with the vendors? • Was the software being used in the same manner that we intend to use it? • Did the software do what the vendors said it would do? • What features exist that were not requested, but really enhanced their system. • How difficult was it to install, manage and operate on a daily basis? • What were the maintenance and staffing requirements? After the site visits, each vendor was asked to prepare their own demonstration of their product. These vendor-controlled presentations were made at their offices or in our Board Room. These demonstrations gave each vendor a chance to answer questions from the site visits and to show new or future features which may be beneficial to the Districts. It should be noted that the finalists were considered equal prior to the site visits, and vendor demonstrations and that price was not considered a factor at that time. FAHR96-38 Page 4 June 12, 1996 Selecting a Vendor The Evaluation Team discussed each site visit in detail and, although no vendor was superior in every functionality requirement, J.D. Edwards was the only vendor able to demonstrate all required computer module applications and was the best solution of the three. J.D. Edwards had the best Capital Projects Management, Job Cost System, and Budget packages. On May 23, the Evaluation Team unanimously selected J.D. Edwards based on the following considerations: • Long tens success and employee satisfaction at the So. Calif. Water Co. • Strong financial and budget applications. • Compatibility with Windows NT. • Ease of creating reports, graphs and presentations from data within the system. • The ability to effectively integrate with our Oracle-based Computerized Maintenance Management System using their new client-server product. Although J.D. Edwards was the second lowest priced vendor, they did rank number one when evaluating the three firms based on a price per functionality point. Hardware The J.D. Edwards system currently runs on an IBM AS/400 platform. This hardware platform is not included in the Districts' current computer architecture and will not directly support the Oracle database utilized by the Districts' Computerized Maintenance Management System. However, J.D. Edwards is introducing their new open-system client server product that has compatibility with all major databases, including Oracle. Their new client server product will coexist on the same database as with their old product so that implementation of the new product can be achieved one application at a time. Their new client server product is being released in phases with the financial applications due to be released in August 1996, and their Human Resource/Payroll modules due to be released December 1997. J.D. Edwards has proposed an IBM platform system within their proposal. Staff has made follow up inquires with J.D. Edwards on their willingness to sell us their new client server product for the financial systems along with the Human Resource/Payroll version running on the IBM platform. It would then be staff s intentions to convert to the Human Resource/Payroll version when it becomes available. J.D. Edwards has expressed a willingness to sell us a mixture of software at the quoted prices within their proposal. However, a 10 percent license fee would be required for each application not originally purchased and subsequently upgraded at a later date. These changes to the original proposal will be negotiated if the Committee approves staffs recommendation. FAHR96-38 Page 5 June 12, 1996 Budget Issues The 1993-94 budget originally proposed a new purchasing and accounting financial information system for a total of$1,500,000. In the intervening years, consultants have been hired and the budget has been modified as the process and project have evolved. The proposed budget for 1996-97 includes an appropriation of$1,700,000 over a two-year period to purchase and implement a new FIS. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Finance, Administration, and Human Resource Committee accept the proposal submitted by J.D. Edwards, authorize staff to enter into negotiations with J.D. Edwards for a new financial information system, and to present a negotiated agreement, in an amount not to exceed $1,525,000, to the Joint Boards for approval at the July 24, 1996 meeting. MW:Ic JIWPDOf.4lN�CRAlff1FPCAfrG1FPHR.8Bv5TPFRiPTAfi1SRFRNR9fi39 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING JUNE 26, 1996 Agenda Item (22)(fl: Consideration of Resolution No.9649,approving Amendment No.1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Kerry Consulting Group for preparation of New Financial Information System, Phase Ili,Selection Process for Hardware and Software;and Phase IV,Implementation and Acceptance of the Selected Hardware and Software Solutions(Specification No.P-167),providing for financial and human resources process and procedure re-engineering oversight not originally included in scope of work,for an amount not to exceed $23,567.00,increasing the total authorized compensation from an amount not to exceed$58,263.00 to an amount not to exceed$81,830.00 (FAHR96-391. Summary Kerry Consulting Group(KCG)was selected to complete Phases III and Phases IV of the Financial Information System (FIS) Project. Phase III was the vendor selection process,which has just been concluded. Due to the lack of response on the initial release of the FIS RFP,staff made the decision to extend the RFP deadline and further simplify and reissue the RFP. KCG simplified the RFP originally prepared by Delolne&Touche by breaking it down into two components. The first component was issued as an initial screening,lim0ed the number of functionality questions to the 20 most critical per financial module, and required that vendors only identify the recommended hardware platform configuration without committing to price. The secondary disclosure process then required the answers to the remaining functionality questions and fixed pricing on the proposed hardware solution. The reissuance of the two-part RFP led to the successful collection of five vendor proposals. It is now time to begin work on Phase IV,the Implementation process. As a consequence of recent site visits to review software installations,the staff sees an opportunity to save significant staff costs In the future by reengineering the Finance and Human Resource processes currently in place. A change order in the amount of$23,567 to Phase IV of the Kerry Consulting Group contract is requested to accomplish this work. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Finance,Administration,and Human Resource Committee approving Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreementwith Kerry Consulting Group for preparation of New Financial Information System, Phase III,Selection Process for Hardware and Software;and Phase IV, Implementation and Acceptance of the Selected Hardware and Software Solutions(Specification No. P-167), providing for financial and human resources process and procedure re-engineering oversight not originally included in scope of work,for an amount not to exceed$23,567.00,increasing the total authorized compensation from an amount not to exceed$58,263.00 to an amount not to exceed $81,830.00. FAHR Committee Recommendation to Joint Boards of Directors The FAHR Committee concurs with staffs recommendation. If copies of the staff report or further information is needed, please contact Mike While. JAWPGGf.1BSYGlxivu nl` JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING AGENDA JUNE 26, 1996 Agenda Item (22)(g): Consideration of the following motions (FAHR96J61: a) Consideration of roll call vote approving proposed 1996-97 Joint Works Budget as follows: Joint Works Operating/Working Capital $48,700,000 Worker's Compensation Self-Insurance 275,000 Public Liability Self-Insurance 386,000 Joint Works Capital Outlay Revolving 44,895,000 b) Consideration of motion approving the proposed FY 1996-97 Individual Districts' Budgets as follows: District No. 1 $33,357,000 District No.2 $152,359,500 District No. 3 $164,454,000 District No. 6 $35,591,000 District No. 6 f27,663,000 District No. 7 $44,475,000 District No. 11 $32,337,000 District No. 13 $10,685,000 District No. 14 $13,481,000 Summary The proposed Budget for 1996-97 was mailed to various Committee members and has been presented to the Planning and Design Committee,the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee, and the Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee. This has allowed each Standing Committee an opportunity to review the proposal prior to the June Board meeting. Although each Standing Committee has had an opportunity to review the proposal, it remains the responsibility of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee to recommend approval of the Joint Works Budgets. The proposed Districts'Budgets for 1996-97 are also being presented to the Joint Boards. In previous years,the Fiscal Policy Committee has approved the Joint Works Budgets in parts,then recommended the total Joint Works Operating, Capital and Self-Insurance Fund Budgets to the Executive Committee. When the Joint Works Budgets were approved by the Joint Boards,they were included in the individual District's budgets which were considered in July. In June, 1995 the budget for 1995-96 to include individual Districts,was presented for consideration. We are continuing this practice again for the 1996-97 Budget. FAHR Committee Recommendation to Joint Boards of Directors The Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee recommends that the Joint Boards of Directors: 1. Approve the proposed Joint Works Operating,Joint Works Capital and Self-Insurance Fund Budgets for 1996-97; and 2. Approve the proposed Individual Districts'Budgets for 199697. reeooaaswawvurese.w 11 _ a r June 26, 1996 MEMORANDUM TO: Joint Boards of Directors SUBJECT: 1996-97 Budget Recommendations FAHR96-36 The proposed Budget for 1996-97 is presented for the Boards' consideration. It has been reviewed by the Planning, Design and Construction Committee and the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee and approved by the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee. As was done last year, the entire budget, including the individual Districts, is being presented for consideration at one time. Although each Standing Committee has had an opportunity to review the proposal, it remains the responsibility of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee to recommend approval of the Joint Works budgets. The FAHR Committee took this action at their June 12, 1996 meeting. The general format of the budget document has been retained from 1995-96. Section 1, 'Introduction," includes the General Manager's Budget Message and the Financial Overview and Budget Issues. The four-page General Manager's Budget Message sets the tone for this year's major issues. It includes a discussion of our overall goal to reduce costs, as shown by the first ever Joint Operating Budget with no increase from the current year expense projections, reorganizing efforts including centralizing support services, and combining Operations and Maintenance to improve efficiency and effectiveness, eliminating all vacant positions, plans for future budget reductions, and continuing focus on quantifying our efforts through an improved performance based budget and Management Performance Review Plan. The Financial Overview and Budget Issues augment the General Manager's Budget Message and provide some more of the detail. The overall cash flow requirements for 1996-97 are budgeted at $147.7 million, a $2.2 million increase over the 1995-96 budgets and an $11.0 million increase over the 1995-96 projections. The increase is primarily made up of the change in the Joint Works Capital Improvement Program, which is budgeted to increase to $44.8 million from the current year's budget of $33.5 million. The five components of the cash requirements budget, and the comparisons of 1995-96 to 1996-97, are shown on the following chart. C9DOC 0 P.O.Box 8127 • FPuntein V.11. ,CA 92728-9127 0 (714)962-2411 FAHR96-36 Page 2 June 12, 1996 Budget Comparisons 09546 Budget (in millions) 095-wpma 896-97 Budget $60.0 f5gA $40.7 $48.7 $50.0 fae.f $40.0 f133 sm.6 f36.7 f17.0 $W.0 $20.0 9.1 $10.0 f6.8 g.D .1 f73 f7.8 $0.0 Jo6nt Dictnct Joint District Debt Opemftg OpenBng capital Capital service Staff has proposed a unique approach to reducing the Joint Works Operating Budget to equal the 1995-96 expense projections. A 1% General Manager's Contingency was budgeted for salaries, wages and benefits, as well as for materials, supplies and services. Amounting to $360,000 and $270,000, these funds will only be allocated by the General Manager to the individual Divisions if warranted and fully justified, but without requiring a special Board action. Using this approach allowed staff to reduce our original budget requests by over$600,000. The change in budget-to-budget and budget-to-projection is discussed for Joint Works Operating, Joint Works Capital, Districts' Operating, and Districts' Capital requirements. Also included is a review of the Districts' available funds, appropriations policy and user fees. User fees have once again been maintained at the prior year's level, while the Strategic Plan is being conducted. Current projections indicate a fee increase will be needed in 1997-98. One of the new non-financial features of this budget is the inclusion of the Critical Goals for 1996-97: • Ensure that the Districts are competitive by improving productivity through proactive manpower planning and the application of technology; • Increase the efficiency and effectiveness of compliance with regulatory requirements for ocean discharge and other permits by improving monitoring and analytical activities to better understand and explain impacts of Districts operations; • Develop a strategic plan which meets the future needs of the service area through appropriate capital investment and environmental stewardship; FAHR96-36 Page 3 June 12, 1996 • Protect employees and the environment by developing and implementing comprehensive and cost-effective safety systems, policies and procedures; • Implement communications programs that support the Districts' mission, promote understanding of our future endeavors and build stronger working relations with our varied audiences; • Provide employee support and training to ensure that the Districts have a highly trained and flexible work force; • Improve management performance by establishing accountability at the cost- center level and using performance measurement and bench-marking to enhance productivity. Section 2, "Policies, Systems and Process; includes the adopted fiscal policy statements, an overview of the budget process, the reader's guide to the budget, the underlying budget assumptions and an explanation of the accounting systems and budgetary controls. Section 3, "Summary-All Districts," is a comprehensive overview, at the highest summary level, of the 1996-97 proposed budget with a focus on the consolidated funds of the individual Districts. Also included are tables and graphs for both revenues and expenses. Section 4, "Summary-Joint Operating," is an overview of the costs to operate and maintain the two treatment plants. Again, there are tables and graphs included for both revenues and expenses to assist in interpreting the data. The Joint Operating costs are the largest single expense in each of the individual Districts' operating fund budgets. Section 5, "Division Budgets," includes four pages for each division. These pages show the organizational structure, staffing trends, a service overview, an analysis of the budget changes and a Joint Works Operating expenditure trend. This level of detail is intended to better explain what services are performed by each Division and Department. Section 6, "Districts Budgets" includes the final budget proposals for each of the individual Districts. Operating fund, capital facilities fund and debt service fund budgets are included as well as a five and ten year District specific project list and cash flow projections by fund are included. Section 7, "Self-Insurance Funds" presents an overview of the liability and workers' compensation funds. For 1996-97 we will be purchasing liability insurance in excess of a $25 million self insurance reserve for the first time since 1986. The health insurance fund budgeted in previous years has not been included as all employee medical and dental insurances will be purchased for the first time since 1979. Section 8, "Capital Improvement Program" gives an overview of the capital plan for the two treatment plants. There is a brief description of each project, including a project location photo, current and future capital costs and projected future maintenance costs. FAHR96-36 Page 4 June 12, 1996 Section 9, "Debt Service," is a new section this year. Included are a listing of the outstanding Certificate of Participation (COP) issues, a discussion of the purpose of each issue and a retirement schedule for both principal and interest. The proposed budget again includes no COP issue for 1996-97, instead we are funding the capital improvement program from accumulated appropriated reserves. Delaying borrowing until next year allows us to postpone user fee increases to repay the debt and to avoid higher required revenue ratios. Future projected borrowing can be seen in Section 3, Page 12 on line 69 of the All Districts Summary Cash Flow Statement. Section 10, "Appendices; includes a detailed staffing history and projection schedule by position and Division, the Gann Appropriation limits, a budget glossary, miscellaneous Districts statistics and an alphabetical subject index. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the proposed Joint Works Operating, Joint Works Capital, individual District Operating, individual District Capital and Self-Insurance Fund Budgets for 1996-97. GGS:Ic J:MP�.MIO MR A"RMB fAHMB.]88 County Sanitation Districts ' of Orange County, California P.O. Box 8127 • 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 MINUTES OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY, MAY 15 , 1996, AT 5:30 P.M. A meeting of the Executive Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Wednesday, May 15. 1996, at the Districts'Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present as follows: EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT: Present Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel John Sauvajot, Consultant John Cox, Joint Chair Steve MacDonald Peer Swan,Vice Joint Chair Kellene Bum-Lucht Pat McGuigan, Chair, District 1 and OMTS Chair STAFF PRESENT: John J. Collins, Chair, District 2 and PDC Chair Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager George Brown, FAHR Chair Blake P.Anderson,Asst Genl. Mgr. Sal A. Sapien, Chair, District 3 Judith A. Wilson,Asst. Genl.. Mgr. Jan Debay, Chair, District 5 Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications James Ferryman, Chair, District 6 Gary Streed, Director of Finance John Gullixson,Chair, District 13 Codna Chaudhry, Committee Secretary Thomas Saltarelli, Chair, District 14 William Steiner, County Supervisor Roger Stanton, County Supervisor Absent: Barry Hammond,Chair, District 7 Victor Leipzig, OMITS Chair, District 11 Don Griffin, Past Joint Chair a Minutes of the Executive Committee ' Page 2 May 15, 1996 2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. (4) APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the February 21, 1996 Executive Committee meeting were approved as drafted. (5) REPORTS OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR, GENERAL MANAGER AND GENERAL COUNSEL (a) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR There was no report by the Committee Chair or Chair pro tem. (b) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager reported that Blake Anderson, Nancy Wheatley and Mike Moore had met with EPA regarding our permit status. It seems that EPA has agreed to a permit schedule which would give us a preliminary permit in August and an approved permit at the State Water Quality Control Board Meeting of October 11. A public hearing will follow after the preliminary permit in August There is a possibility that the permit could be issued as a 10-year permit vs. a 5-year permit The General Manager reported that we did not submit names for a Special Districts Advisory Committee for LAFCO unfit the day of the Selection Committee Meeting, but we were able to have George Brown attend the meeting. However, upon attending the meeting, George Brown found that there wasn't a quorum. The next meeting will be held at the end of the month and they have asked us to provide a one-page resume for our nominees. George Brown and Judy Wilson are our nominees as they have asked that we be represented by both electeds and Districts' staff. George Brown reported that there are five candidates for the four available slots, and after speaking with Garden Grove and Costa Mesa, consensus was that Garden Grove, Costa Mesa, and two representatives from the Sanitation Districts would be selected. George Brown felt that if there had been a quorum and the meeting hadn't been postponed,the possibility of us getting the nomination would have been good. George Brown explained that the LAFCO Committee was initiated because sometimes LAFCO didn't understand some of the financial and operating problems of the sanitation and water districts, and this committee would help clarify some of these issues. (c) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL The General Counsel had no report. (6) The Committee moved to address the agenda items as follows: Minutes of the Executive Committee — Page 3 May 15, 1996 (a) Oral Report on South County Water and Sewer Agencies Consolidation Report prepared by John Sauvajot. (John Sauvajot, Consultant) Judy introduced John Sauvajot,who is our consultant on the Districts' Consolidation study and who is also consultant to the South County Water&Sewer agencies. John Sauvajot reported on the status of the South County Water and Sewer Agencies regarding their Consolidation efforts. Mr. Sauvajot mentioned that there were various alternatives used to arrive at the possible scenarios which might be used to resolve a number of principal objectives. This study was done so that South County could take a hard look at the organizations that they have, to possibly best rearrange themselves, to have a strong voice, and to have the opportunity for water capacity as well as water reliability. A comprehensive data base on the various districts was constructed. This data base was then used to formulate some rearrangement where some of these characteristics would have some commonality. Another factor used to determine this rearrangement was that they should have contiguous territory. The total rearrangement combinations that they ended up with was 34. Mr. Sauvajot mentioned that they were also attempting to go through the LAFCO process because this would allow the opportunity for a formal and documented process. Mr. Sauvajot mentioned that this report would be available for public review in about 30 days. Mr. Sauvajofs target date for a final draft report is July 20. (b) Discussion of Pringle Bill-AB 2109 Don McIntyre reported that the Pringle Bill will probably go forward due to very little political apposition from the legislature, and for a variety of reasons, it looks like there is nothing that is going to stop this bill from reaching the Governors desk. It seems that the Pringle Bill will probably get signed unless there is some evidence of the South County reorganization and the Districts'Consolidation. Senator Lockyear also has a similar Bill for his county (Alameda),and is looking to enact it Tom Woodruff is following the Pringle Bill both through CASA and on behalf of the Districts. Tom Woodruff reported that nothing is getting in the way of this Bill, and that this is really a leverage bill; leverage is to get results out of the City of Garden Grove and the Garden Grove Sanitary Districts. Although Assemblyman Pringle is advocating fewer elected officials, one of his main concerns in the Pringle Bill is that there aren't direct electeds governing the Districts. John Sauvajot mentioned that the South County Groups, Co-Chair Ron Kennedy,Jon Schotz, Keith Coolidge, and himself had met with Debra Gonzales, Principal Policy Advisor to Pringle. Mr. Sauvajot said that Ms. Gonzales, although encouraged by the actions taken by the South County Group and by other groups in the County,was still unconvinced that there would be actions taken on these recommendations due to some groups not liking the proposed changes and delaying or derailing the LAFCO process. The impression from Ms. Gonzales was that although it was good to make recommendations, things also needed to be implemented. John Collins asked at what level was the Pringle Bill going to address debt service and rate equalization, as it was extremely difficult to concur on these type of issues in our own homogeneous base and working environment He was wandering how and when these type issues were going to be addressed in the Pringle Bill? John Sauvajot mentioned that once the Bill had been implemented, these issues would be resolved at the local level and not by state legislation. Minutes of the Executive Committee Page 4 May 15, 1996 Don McIntyre also mentioned that there was a possibility for an enormous savings in the combined operating budget in South County. (10%of$247 million and a potential of 20% savings). George Brown said that even if we resolved all these issues we were still faced with not having directly elected representatives on the Board. James Ferryman said that he wasn't in favor of creating a large bureaucracy and that we needed to go back to our respective constituents and ask them to tell their elected officials that they didn't want their rates raised, and that we have to address the Pringle Bill as it now reads. Supervisor William Steiner gave an example of the Rancho Santa Margarita Water District not privatizing due to the public speaking against it and mid that he didn't think the public would support the Pringle Bill. Peer Swan mentioned that he felt that the wholesalers/retailers should get rid of all the in- between people and just have one wholesaler. John Cox said that he thought that the spirit to not do business as usual was here and that we needed to take it upon ourselves to figure out how to operate more efficiently. He said that we needed to raise our level of interest and to figure out a way that we could work cooperatively with other agencies in the County and in Sacramento. John Gullixson said that Directors were not doing their jobs very well because of members having other agendas which have priority,and that meant not devoting enough time to this agency. He mentioned that the Directors and this agency could best be sewed if the Directors had their attention less divided, and that he could see some merit in the Pringle Bill discussion regarding electeds serving on the Board. Mr. Gullixson felt that having an independent elected Board and serving a 4-year term made sense. Sal Sapien said that he didn't think the Pringle Bill would pass the legislature. George Brown asked if it was a consensus that we would move into Consolidation of our own Districts. (c) Presentation on Final Consolidation Report Judy Wilson gave a presentation on Consolidation and addressed the timeliness of this issue due to the Pringle Bill and provided information as to what had changed since February. Judy Wilson reported that the three major issues at this time are governance of the new district and equalization of rates, as well as the issue of District 14 and IRWD. The proposed new district would be consolidated pursuant to California Government Code pertaining to consolidation or reorganization of Districts,and the governance of the new district would be organized pursuant to either Section 4730 or 4730.1 of the California Health and Safety Code. If the new district is organized under Section 4730,there would be 24 members—one member from each of the 20 cities, one from each of the three sanitary districts and one representing the unincorporated areas of Orange County. IRWD would not have a seat on the Minutes of the Executive Committee Page 5 May 15, 1996 board. If formed under Section 4730.1.there would be 30 members—one member from each of the 23 cities (including Garden Grove,Westminster and Costa Mesa), one from each of the three sanitary districts, one from each of the water districts that provide sewer service, and one county representative. Judy Wilson reported that at this time the consultant is recommending organization under Section 4730.1 and to include all nine districts in the organization. Due to the unpopularity of the plan to equalize rates we are recommending status quo on any rate change. Nine revenue zones would be created and maintained so that each Disbictwould continue to have its own user fees and to establish improvement districts for previous indebtedness. For District 14,we recommend that agreement between District 14 and the Districts be assigned to IRWD and that the same terms and conditions of the November'95 agreement remain in force. Improvement Districts would be formed to pay for debt service and property taxes would be assigned to each improvement district, and no new financial obligations would be imposed on IRWD because of Consolidation. IRWD would continue to have its own user fees. Judy Wilson asked the Committee if they wanted to move forward and present this to the Board meeting in June. Judy Wilson mentioned that if the Committee agreed to go forward,we could meet the following deadlines: -IAFCO Application by June 1996 -Completion by March 1997 -Implementation by July 1997 In summary, Judy Wilson suggested that we organize under 4730.1,include all nine districts, consolidate into one district, maintain nine revenue zones for user fees, use improvement districts for debt, for IRWD maintain terms and conditions of the November Agreement, and assign the Contract from District 14 to IRWD. John Collins asked what the Consolidation benefits were and suggested that before we take this to the Board we needed to have a benefit itemization. Judy Wilson said that the major benefit was from a political standpoint, and also public perception. John Cox mentioned that Consolidation would be a more efficient method of doing things as Board members would decrease to 30 members, and as it now stands,the possibility of having 45-55 members on the Board wouldn't exist. motion was moved, seconded and passed to put this issue on the Joint Board agenda for June. Minutes of the Executive Committee Page 6 May 15, 1996 The motion was amended to include a benefits'element in the presentation to the Board, and that staff provide the pros and cons of the governance options. The Committee would also like to have a legal opinion from Geneml Counsel that if there was a particular member agency which disagreed with the governance,what could that city or agency do with regard to their position and what approach would have to be taken with LAFCO. It was further amended to direct the staff to present option two(4730.1)to the Board, so that there is not a complicated presentation on IRWD, District 14 options. Sal Sapien asked General Counsel what would happen if a particular city representative didn't want to move forward with this Consolidation, what alternatives would they have. General Counsel replied that the Districts'vote would be the determining factor to move forward whether an individual member agency approved it or not Peer Swan said that it makes sense to investigate the feasibility of acquiring the collection systems in the different cities to see if there is an interest in cities letting the Sanitation Districts own, operate and maintain these since they have the revenue zones to do this. Peer suggested that it makes more sense for the Districts to own and operate the enfire wastewater system from the ocean all the way back to the individual user and that we should be working on this. Don McIntyre said that we should talk to the cities and bring this back as a voluntary issue. Supervisor Roger Stanton complemented all staff involved in getting the bankruptcy issue resolved in only 18 months. He said that we should have the official stigma of bankruptcy removed by Mid-June. He also pointed out that Merrill Lynch argued to derail this; however it was rejected. Supervisor William Steiner said that he would be in New York and would go to market in three weeks on the$800 million borrowing and that with the MBI insurance that we have, he thought Moody's would give us an investment rating this Friday or next week. Mr. Steiner thinks we will officially be out of bankruptcy before July 1. Blake Anderson commented on the San Francisco meeting with EPA Blake Anderson discussed the meeting and said that the formal process will begin in August a hearing in Mid- September by EPA and the RWOCB, and that in October we will formally be issued a permit. This could be a 10-year permit This permit would allow us to discharge under a 301(h)waiver and to in fact decrease the amount of secondary treatment for ocean discharge and to divert that to reclaimed water. This permit would allow this agency to move toward a major increment of water reclamation. (7) CLOSED SESSION There was no need for a Closed Session. (8) OTHER BUSINESS There was no other business. (9) MATTERS TO RE REPORTED ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. (10) MATTERS ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT. Minutes of the Executive Committee Page 7 May 15, 1995 There were none. (11) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Executive Committee meeting to be determined. (12) ADJOURNMENT The Chair pro tem declared the meeting adjourned at 7:31 p.m. Submitted by: _ t CO Corina Chaudhry, Secretary J.MPOOLIGMQECfBW IY'OSIS�.M�N County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California f P.O. Box 8127 • 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE see Wednesday, June 19, 1996 at 5:30 p.m. A meeting of the Executive Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Wednesday, June 19, 1996, at 5:30 p.m., at the Districts'Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT: Present: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Michael Ford, Ford Sauvajot John Cox, Jr., Joint Chair Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair Pat McGuigan, Chair, District 1 and OMTS Chair STAFF PRESENT: John J. Collins, Chair, District 2 and PDC Chair Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager George Brown, FAHR Chair Blake P. Anderson, Asst. Gent. Mgr. Sal A. Sapien, Chair, District 3 Judith A. Wilson, Asst. Gent. Mgr. Jan Debay, Chair, District 5 Gary Streed, Director of Finance James Ferryman, Chair, District 6 Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications Barry Hammond, Chair, District 7 Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary John Gullixson, Chair, District 13 Thomas Saltarelli, Chair, District 14 Roger Stanton, County Supervisor William Steiner, County Supervisor Don R. Griffin, Past Joint Chair Absent: Victor Leipzig, Chair, District 11 2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. l 4 Minutes of the Executive Committee Page 2 June 19, 1996 (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. (4) APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the May 15, 1996, Executive Committee meeting were approved as drafted. (5) REPORTS OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR, GENERAL MANAGER, AND GENERAL COUNSEL (a) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair did not report. (b) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager did not report. (c) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL ACTIVITIES RE PRINGLE BILL—AS2109 The General Counsel updated the Executive Committee on the recent developments re the Pringle Bill. At this time Pringle's focus, and that of Orange County local agency interests, is on the 18 water purveyors in south county. The consolidation report by Ford Sauvajot on the 18 south county agencies was received and reviewed. A steering committee was formed to evaluate the report and the committee came up with recommendations to present to Pringle on Friday as an amendment to AB2109. The recommendations are outlined in a fax dated June 18, 1996 to Tom Woodruff from John Schatz, attached to these minutes. However, the 7 entities in north county have not been addressed and no resolution has been proposed. In conjunction with the General Counsel's report, Judy Wilson reported on the League of CA Cities meeting of city managers on AB2109 held this afternoon in Lake Forest. It appears that the recommendations included in the Ford Sauvajot report caught many of the managers by surprise and they are uncomfortable with them. As a result, Janet Huston, Executive Director of LCCIOC has been directed to prepare a resolution supporting the proposed amendment as outlined in the June 18, 1996 fax and send it to Sacramento on Friday. Their goal is to present a common, unified approach. The resolution can and will be considered only by the LCCIOC Executive Committee because of the need for timeliness. It was also announced at the meeting that the City of San Clemente has asked contacted Senator Craven to try to Wend the dated of the hearing beyond July 3. It was also noted that Senator Lockyer has said that the Senate Local Government Committee will not consider any amendment unless it comes from Speaker Pringle's office. V Minutes of the Executive Committee Page 3 June 19, 1996 Tom Woodruff indicated that in his opinion there is one thing missing from the bill and that is the right of the people within the special districts to have a say in the proposal. After further discussion, Sal Sapien asked that the issue be placed on the next Joint Boards of Directors agenda to discuss additional actions necessary by the Districts in the event it appears that the Districts may be included in the A82109 consolidation effort. (6) Discussion of Consolidation and Determine Which Section of the California Health and Safety Code to Cite on the LAFCO Application After the May 15, 1996 Executive Committee meeting, staff asked for clarification from the Chair on the directions received from the members, and as a result, staff was asked to prepare a pros and cons comparison of consolidation under both Sections 4730 and 4730.1 of the California Health 8 Safety Code. Judy Wilson gave a brief background summary report on issues discussed previously by the Committee and then made a presentation on the benefits of consolidation including, streamlining procedures, providing a clear decision-making process, more understandable system to the public, reduction in number of special districts, and opportunity to reduce the number of board members. The difference in governance under the two sections was discussed, with the major difference being the size of the board. Under Section 4730, there would be 24 members (20 cities, 3 sanitary districts, and county supervisor). Under Section 4730.1, there would be 30 members (23 cities, 3 sanitary districts, 3 water districts and county supervisor). A principal difference between the two alternatives is that under Section 4730 IRWD would no longer be a member of the Board but would remaind as a contract agency sending sewage to the Sanitation District. The time table for LAFCO approval was reviewed as follows: Application made—July 96; completion of review—October 96; implementation— December 1996. After discussing the pros and cons, including a fourth option offered by Director Gullixson of having members of the new board be elected for a four-year term with one representative from each city and one from the County. The role of IRWD in the existing system of governance was also discussed. General Counsel indicated that the governance system suggested by Director Gullixson would require special legislation. Chair Cox indicated that better governance is the primary goal of consolidation. Under the present system, voting has caused, and will continue to cause, problems because voting by individuals (as in Committees) and then by District (in Joint Boards meetings) has resulted in different outcomes. MOTION WAS MADE AND SECONDED TO PROCEED WITH CONSOLIDATION OF THE NINE SANITATION DISTRICTS INTO ONE SANITATION DISTRICT. AFTER ADDITIONAL DISCUSSION, THE MOTION CARRIED (11-2 WITH DIRECTOR SWAN ABSTAINING). By show of hands, the Committee members voted on the preferred section under which to submit the LAFCO application: Section 4730 received 6 votes, Section 4730.1 received 7 votes, with Director McGuigan abstaining. Minutes of the Executive Committee Page 4 June 19, 1996 Therefore, the recommended action to the Joint Boards is as follows: CONSIDERATION OF MOTION RECOMMENDING THAT STAFF BE AUTHORIZED TO FILE LAFCO APPLICATION FOR CONSOLIDATION OF THE NINE SANITATION DISTRICTS INTO ONE SANITATION DISTRICT UNDER CALIFORNIA HEALTH & SAFETY CODE SECTION 4730.1. General Counsel indicated that if a District fails to approve consolidation at the Joint Boards meeting, that District would not be a part of the consolidation and would stand alone. The result would be two districts—one consolidated district and the old district. LAFCO would then consider the future of the stand-alone district and could make its dissolution a condition of the approval. (7) CLOSED SESSION The Chair reported to the Executive Committee the need for a closed session, as authorized by Government Code Section 54956.9, to discuss and consider two items specified as 7(b)(1) and 7(b)(2) on the published Agenda. The Committee convened in Closed Session at 7 p.m. Confidential minutes of the Closed Session held by the Executive Committee have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54956.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. A report of actions taken in Closed Session will be publicly reported at the time the approved action becomes final re Agenda Item No. 7(b)(2). There was no action taken on Agenda Item No. 7(b)(1). At 7:15 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session. (6) OTHER BUSINESS There was no other business discussion. (9) MATTERS TO BE REPORTED ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. (10) MATTERS ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT. There were none. (11) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next meeting of the Executive Committee will be at the call of the Chair. Minutes of the Executive Committee Page 5 June 19, 1996 (12) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:17 p.m. ubmitted by: Tappan, Secrbtaty MIENECBBLIUNEb Im mlN ' FROM : LOODIRLIFF TL PFOW NO. : 714 731 4193 - P02 Ica Lnna w.rtteea 9a-al-90 Otte ?99 V11 n99-1 Sonfa Manganita Wateu Distrzirt POST OFFICE BOX 2M MISSION ME.14 CAUFORMA 0200•bra 28111 ANTONIO PARKWAY,RANCHO SANTA MMOMrrA,CAUFORNJA cwTDM91 SETMCE(Fta)K98470 ADMINISTRATION '1wom OPERATIONS 4S)-rA 0' MEMORANDUM DATEt JUN11is, im TO: TOM WOODRUFF FFROMJOHN SCRATZUF RR PROPOSED AB 2109 AMIU40IMENTS As you may be aware,wa am pm7arlog proposed amendments to AS 2109 which,amm COW thmge,excludes County Sanitation Districts of Orange County from the 8111.In eoanedloh with prgmting the ammhacnts, we are also dMling a doeument emanwixing the resams auppordoS the amendments. Attadted, Is a draft of the portion of the support document discustdng OCWD sad CSDOG As 1 know you be" spent a eooeidembie amount of time addteasing Igpctaters and Whets regarding the speclfles of why CSDOC should he exempted, we woWd appreciate your axoateam or preparation of more bW for Inoluslco in the document. Slam we am planning on pmaaatluy We xmeudtuauW(also stdched)to PAaglc's strff on 71sunday or Prlday of this week, we arould appreciate your comments on the CSDOC portion Immediately. Thank you for your prompt reapum I apulogiee for the short notice, however, as you know, we art operating under ezlgtol clmamnianue dictated by the legislative procmK - -1. - - -1 rrwe_ror_etl •rtt NY HITXHrIXHW HINHf FR : LrKDRLFF TL FrCNr NO. : 714 731 4193 p03 It# FOOd adW qn 99-01-OD Y[f6 265 Ill. %08-9 MLUMUUnn Of Or aria Cc= V Me ' unty Imitation QSeLiio! of prangs +nLv Moat of northern orange County overlies the Banta Ana Croluldsater Basin, which is the primary source of drinking water tar that area. one of the Gnil]ue aepeote of the Benin is that it is not ad iud icatedI rubber, the overlying agencies operate oaoparot3vely through Orange county water District (CM) in Managing the Basin for p�pasee of maturing an adequate supply of high Quality water at the Sowaat eaible cast. OCMD is also s party to the Banta ana River adfudioation which gaarantoes a Certain quantity and quality of rater troy the 8ivar essential to the Basin. OCwD hoe successfully balanced the interests of the Basin produowrs without the necessity of an adjudication, however, Clearly this delicate balance would he upset it northern Orange County were cominad with mn-Basin agencies and the attendant threat of aooialiring the Basin's reaourees for non-ovarlyinq areas. Groundwater adjudioations require several yearn to renalve and undoubtedly would involve substantial costs. county Sanitation District of orange County (C9DOC) essentially operates as a consolidated agency dedicated to praviding sewage treatment services for a large anon of north Orange county. The consolidation of CBDDO with other agencies is not consistent with local aymoy restructuring objectives, intended by At 110e as it will not result in reduced costs or increased efficiencies from aconomias of scale. -.. ..... .... -. . ..� ... . n. rrwC-roc l.rl •nr NH MITNH9NHW H1N85 3RNIH MHKUHKIIH HLu lY• IL4-JOL-iMJJ .J,. a� I„ ., , ,,,,, 'VPMa SMIM PIdPTWW 1ap10J Pa/lauuea IDIOM Alamo o8u14] T—d`Olmla n1IM PIdpp" ulID-KL 'Alamo ;4u=o lu IaPlga ImoM ld?Pu+W :gmlwl ga14M +ulouoto Mnu 21MI gr BoIplaa aql 7aPlala nlmM AunoO a90vO opnlo0q m gsoq apaq =wApunm8 ■ uo Walam m aq Sam Imyy saPmParoq >niM 'oolaaa8o apmiaga o.a1 algl mom w wa. am q=s as 8661 'w r+gm'+aaa a011.Mia10u fevpuaauul 211 maPtmoa Pao O>[113gwu 11,91 OodY'100 TTSMV •c uolp*s al P*M*3 a as 1aPPIa nigm 41ono, -pammd taumgv P—•7 AWan aftua agl 6q paulm iop ag Am w idaaaa Ills tM 10 w01o1•02d aqi m Im(cM aq pu IP41 4uno-J aBamO N SPIA la 9011"lS AvnwD Pug PPPla moM Aon<p 18a1i0 TTqPV (--w Mono p IA N pyMp<+aP"ris,1 e W) wM aw*Iwa ay.maO PWa apM paIw611aK1=on'8 P14ga IMM 90111TV of pP1ga"M&(IIgL M'L plMM uOf Oul almdg7 ppnou awM RMOU 4020 lM MWO»p.N 0tmu,S 9 lama 1918M feral RHOS pmu Ama[-cc)4-0 ma dla.'f (ow"M alS P 40 oM MAryolul u*-d pS4 pppµi IDIOM P%N-4M M Opwa angM la1PPa'W 4*1401IL'61 PPM Dish SOW Wl Pogo amM DAL ID[ (Wwd Mar F A1D�w Jo pow 4mP(Qgm 1 aompmq) q0x.swam wQe aum oma km*n%MW ow•4 V WM OOFF*M xrr d Ooaua6 (oamigdSj aPiT u�S 3o "PM 7opM f1a1[O U M vwm 6 VMS 510MM-) 40 pFaga tlCOA6 'L mwAl mpM AMPA 0-=O '6 pp u=&O POLM am 14Ma MIM 400a.aPadO wMQ no%u1aq =W I WOO aPM PLIO 4/•8 Imma aPM M"OD oanqNL pPaK1 aPM LPn00818®S'I pplga nPM AWWO U&PO e8'1 INR'lf aaymwa 6661 `ie ngmx°a IL "61 ilf•a*-Md v :ulanq pa(poado sWp Mp uagl 1M11 w O.+all03 ca paalgaw aq 11a4a 01a0 811 3meM BuMwIPB 24L 601Z SV O.L SLN8NiGMNWV 3ALLVN113.LZV 1-96% 711 592 9435 00-18-ma W44PY P005 ail q V0d £6TV S£L VIL '@I 34Did IL A41Z ]p3 : wo( u FROM : UDOD LFF TL PHD! C- t17. : 714 731 4193 pgs - iCe aaea will:" 95-81-90 SE16 ZS9 11L XLe-a Nei 4, Subjat to Mc Wro bimu of SeWoo 5M of the Govommmt Code only fm the agenda listed In Section 1, OCiAPCO shen Implement In a timely man= Mild complete Im p"coodsov, w ister than the data epodGW is Sections, l and 3 the eombining of spndes Y povWW for hadn. Bach agency MW in Scaim I and 3 aWl pay tho co+t of OCAPCO poccdings In an .m t to bo dotamined by OCLAPCO- - x- an•a JTn•OW Jb1JT gR.nT unr Cebfi-7.gC-bW :(IT UZH ulIsumuw S1Nuf FROM : woODRLFF n PHOW NO. : 714 731 4193 FOG ire 1004 a117-90 9B-91-90 906 289 rlL a95-8 PRErBItl= AmENDMENT9 TO AB 2109 Section I D by December 31, Will the recommendations for changes of org:mhmtion or rangenhoulanI4 as defined In Sactlom Sd021 and 36073 of the Owernmcat Coda, m&pectively,of the wholesale and remit water agencies contained is the Service Delivery System And Governance Impirrvemear Study('Poe Study")currently, being prepared are not undarteten and completed by the wholesale and mm0 water agencies .coder review In the Study in accordance with the procedure cl aedbed in Section 3 hcrela, We Bill,subject to the provbwm of Seed.®2 and 3,shad( beeomo opemlive on January 1, 2002. Seeger i N n itlu Mnding the Implamenmtion or otherwise of the Sandy recommendations for changes of organlmtiwt or mengrninthme or the wholesale and retail water ageacres under review In the Study In accordance.with the pro Wo¢s of Sdion 1 berets,Orange County Water District and County Sunlmtlm. Disubas of Orange County&hell not be subject to the pmvWom of, nor Included within, this 8111. Section 35 3ubja hr the pruvislom of Section MI. of the Gwcmrnent Mile only for the mmtl agemiaa, the Orange County local Agency Formation Commbalon shell implement to a timely manner and complex Ian proceedings on law then December 31, IM We mcommandatimta for changes of orpaolrEdon and marganlzations of the wholesale and remil water agencies cnnmined in the Study. r.n' a JTn- aN gnus gF.n1 Nnr 9£o6-Z85-b1L:U OZH 1:11I81:198HN H1NH! JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING JUNE 26, 1996 Agenda Item (23): Recommendation on Governance Options for Consolidation Background At the May 15, 1996 Executive Committee meeting,the staff presented the Final Consolidation Report prepared by John Sawajot of Ford Sawajot Management Group,Inc. After discussion by the Committee, it was agreed that Consolidation should be placed on the June Joint Boards agenda for action. The motion which was approved by the Committee was not entirely clear. While the Committee endorsed moving forward under Section 4730.1 of the California Health and Safety Code,it also approved an amendment to the motion which requested a presentation on the pros and cons of organizing under either Section 4730 or 4730.1. The Committee also requested that a clear recommendation be made to the Board on governance to avoid a long and complicated presentation to the Board sorting through the two governance options and the resulting impacts to District 14 and IRWD. As a consequence,the Joint Chair has requested that the Committee revisit the issue of governance and that the Committee reconsider its previous action so the Committee could clearly understand the differences between consolidating under 4730 and 4730.1 and then vote again on a recommendation. This report will outline the differences between the two governance options and explain the pros and cons of each. Budget Impact: The maximum amount which can be paid to a regular Board member is$600 a month. Under 4730 there would be 24 members. Under 4730.1 there would be 30 members; therefore,the total difference in cost between 4730 and 4730.1 is$43200 a year for Board compensation. Since equalization of fees is not being recommended,there would be no change in user fees as a consequence of consolidation. The provisions of the November 1995 agreement with Disrict 14 would stay in force under either governance option. The agreement would simply be reassigned to IRWD and there would be no financial impact as a consequence of consolidation. Executive Committee Recommendation The Executive Committee recommends that the Joint Boards of Directors authorize staff to file LAFCO application for consolidation of the nine County Sanitation Districts into one County Sanitation District pursuant to California Health & Safety Code Section 4730.1. JAWa J 1WPWLlGM,gcCWV VHEy9pICpV A June 10, 1996 by STAFF REPORT Status Report on Consolidation Study Background The Districts have been discussing Consolidation for several years. In the 1980's, the Grand Jury recommended Consolidation. In January, 1995 the issue was raised again and the staff was asked to prepare a report for the Board. This report was presented in July, 1995 with a recommendation to proceed; however, the Board requested further study. In response to that request a detailed feasibility study was prepared. The preliminary report was presented at the February, 1995 Executive Committee meeting and a final report was presented at the May 15, 1995 meeting. The unanimous passage of Speaker Pringle's AB 2109 through the State Assembly has further underscored the importance of this issue. The Speaker has recently indicated that he will be considering amendments from June 25, 1996 through July 5, 1996 and that It is his intent to make progress on government restructuring this year. If the Districts act to consolidate by June, 1996 it may improve the likelihood that CSDOC will not be included in the bill. The Benefits of Consolidation Before the Pringle Bill was ever submitted, the Boards had identified Consolidation as a Critical Goal for FY'95-96. The benefits of Consolidation include: • More streamlined governance and a less awkward decision-making procedure. District-by- District voting can potentially skew results when Board members are narrowly divided on an issue. • More understandable system to the general public. • Reduction in the number of"special districts", which has also been an issue of public concern. • Opportunity to reduce the number of Board members (depending upon the statute recommended for Consolidation). It should be noted that the Boards could potentially have as many as 55 people. In 1994, membership of the Board of Directors was reduced by most represented agencies voluntarily limiting representation to one individual. Huntington Beach and Newport Beach, cities which still send two members each, have single city districts as well as membership on other districts. The Board of Supervisors, which sits on all nine Boards, have two representatives. A true Consolidation is the next logical step in the process. Over the past several months the policy discussions have focused on three issues: • governance • userfees • the impact on District 14 and IRWD CSDOC • P.O. Box 8127 0 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8122 0 (714)962-2411 Staff Report Page 2 ` June 10, 1996 The Board gave staff clear direction regarding user fees. It was agreed that equalization of fees would not be pursued. Instead, revenue zones would be established in order to maintain the existing user fee schedules. The General Counsel reviewed the District 14/IRWD issue and has opined that the November, 1995 agreement between the Districts and District 14 would stay in force with the agreement simply being reassigned to IRWD. All provisions of the contract would remain in force. Improvement Districts would be formed for existing debt and property taxes assigned accordingly, so IRWD would not be responsible for assuming the debt of other districts. The remaining issue where there appears to be some controversy deals with governance of the system. Under existing State Law, the Districts may reorganize using either Section 4730 or Section 4730.1 of the California Health and Safety Code. The consolidation process is subject to LAFCO approval; however, if each District approves a resolution applying for consolidation, LAFCO is obligated to approve, or conditionally approve, the proposal. At the May 15 Executive Committee meeting, the staff was requested to carefully review the pros and cons of consolidating under 4730 or 4730.1. This report is intended to lay out the governance options available under current law and the implications in terms of streamlining, public perception, cost, and likely LAFCO staff recommendations. Governance Options 1) Organizing under 4730 If the Districts consolidated under 4730, the following agencies would be on the Board: - County (1)-County of Orange unincorporated area. - Cities (20) Anaheim Irvine Tustin Brea La Habra Santa Ana Buena Park La Palma Seal Beach Cypress Los Alamitos Stanton Fountain Valley Newport Beach Villa Park Fullerton Orange Yorba Linda Huntington Beach Placentia - Sanitary Districts (3) Costa Mesa Garden Grove Midway City Under 4730 the Board would have 24 members. Each city would have one representative and there would be no representation from Irvine Ranch Water District, since under 4730 water districts are not eligible for membership. There would be only one member of the Board of Supervisors representing unincorporated Orange County. Staff Report Page 3 June 10, 1996 Pros • Consolidating under 4730 results in a smaller governing body. • All provisions of the current agreement between the Districts and District 14 would remain in place. If District 14 is dissolved, the contract is reassigned to IRWD. • Consolidating under 4730 is $43,000 less than consolidating under 4730.1 in terms of Board compensation. Cons • With the loss of IRWD on the Board, the continued existence of District 14 comes into question. • IRWD may want the Consolidated District to repurchase real property assets in the Joint works. This would be a policy choice for the Consolidated District. There is no legal requirements to do so. IRWD's acquired interest in the Districts' real property is valued at approximately$4.6 million. Follow-up Action Required • Districts 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13 would vote to consolidate under 4730. • The future of District 14 would need to be determined; LAFCO would make this determination. It would not be a decision for the Consolidated Board. Options include: 1) District 14 remains as an independent County Sanitation District and will have a "service contract"with the new Consolidated District. 2) District 14 continues as an independent County Sanitation District. A new Joint Board could be established to include District 14 and the newly Consolidated District. 3) District 14 is dissolved and the territory is established as a special zone within IRWD, With an agreement between IRWD and the new Consolidated District with the identical terms as presently exist. Discussion If the point of Consolidation is to reduce the number of special districts as well as the size of the Board, the most appropriate approach for dealing with District 14 under 4730 is option#3, dissolution of District 14. LAFCO would likely object to continuing on with District 14, as outlined under option#1, because the same outcome can be obtained by simply reassigning the contract to IRWD, while reducing the number of special districts. Option#2 would also be unlikely to receive support by LAFCO staff as it creates a "new"Joint Board which gives the appearance of providing disproportionate representation for District 14. In taking action on Consolidation,those Districts wishing to consolidate under 4730 could pass such a resolution. Assuming that eight Districts take action, the future of District 14 could be left to LAFCO for action, or an agreement could be reached by the members of District 14 and conveyed to LAFCO for its consideration. Staff Report Page 4 June 10, 1996 2) Organizing under 4730.1 If the Districts Consolidated under 4730.1 the following agencies would be on the Board: - County (1) - County of Orange unincorporated area. - Cities (23) Anaheim Irvine Seal Beach Brea La Habra Stanton Buena Park La Palma Villa Park Costa Mesa* Los Alamitos Westminster` Cypress Newport Beach Yorba Linda Fountain Valley Orange Fullerton Placentia Garden Grove* Tustin Huntington Beach Santa Ana - Sanitary Districts (3) Costa Mesa Garden Grove Midway City - Water Districts engaged in wastewater treatment(3) Irvine Ranch Los Alamitos* Yorba Linda* 'Additional agencies added to current Board. (5) Under this statute, the Board would have 30 members. Each city would have one representative. Five additional agencies would be added: the cities of Costa Mesa, Garden Grove, and Westminster, and two additional water districts, Los Alamitos and Yorba Linda. Pros • Consolidating under this option is more inclusionary. It avoids eliminating Irvine Ranch Water District as a member agency. All nine Districts would be consolidated into a single governing body. • As water reclamation becomes more important to the region, a close working relationship with IRWD will be important. Membership on the Consolidated Board could facilitate this. • All provisions of the November, 1995 agreement between District 14 and the Districts would remain in force with the contract being reassigned to IRWD. Cons • Organizing under 4730.1 would result in a larger Board of 30 members, defeating one of the purposes of the consolidation effort. The public would expect to see not only a decrease in Staff Report Page 5 June 10, 1996 the number of special districts, but also a decrease in the number of officials sifting on the Consolidated Board. • This could cost as much as$43,200 a year more than consolidating under 4730 because of additional Board member compensation. Follow-up Action required • All nine Districts would vote to consolidate under 4730.1. • No further action would be needed regarding District 14 as it would be incorporated into the Consolidated District. • The November 1995 agreement between District 14 and the Districts would be reassigned to IRWD. Discussion When the consultant prepared the report, it was his view that consolidation of District 14 would "accelerate the normalization of its relationship with the other Districts"; a process which was recently bolstered by the renegotiation of District 14's contract. There would be no perceived need to repurchase assets. By opting to include District 14, it was presumed that a difficult and potentially "deal-breaking issue"would be avoided, albeit at the price of including three more cities and two more water districts. Next Steps Assuming that the Board can achieve consensus and opts to proceed with consolidation under either 4730 or 4730.1, resolutions can be prepared for the June Joint Boards' meeting. In discussion with LAFCO staff, they have indicated that once the application is filed they can fast- track the consolidation and complete it within 90 days. This would result in a Consolidated District by October 1996. JAW:cmc JAMDOCIGM�ECMUNMONSOUDA" JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING JUNE 26, 1996 DISTRICTS 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 & 11 (ONLY) Agenda Item (24): Consideration of the following resolutions selecting the annual change in California per capita personal income as the cost-of-living adjustment factor, and establishing the annual Gann Appropriations Limit for fiscal year 1996-97 for each District in accordance with the provisions of Division 9 of Title 1 of the California Government Code: DISTRICT RESOLUTION NO. LIMITATION 1 96-60-1 $2,894,000 2 96-61-2 11,079,000 3 96-62-3 15,289,000 5 96-63-5 2,732,000 6 96-64-6 1,770,000 7 96-65-7 5,217,000 11 96-66-11 3,300,000 Summary This routine annual action appearing in the agenda adopts resolutions for each of the Districts authorizing execution and fling of all documents necessary for state and federal construction grants and/or loan applications for 1996-97. Recommendation Staff recommends approval and adoption of above resolutions. JAWPOOCOSIAG9 UN966.24 RESOLUTION NO. 96- - ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996-97 FOR THE DISTRICT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF DIVISION 9 OF TITLE 1 OF THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. _OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996-97 FOR THE DISTRICT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF DIVISION 9 OF TITLE 1 OF THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE . .... .. .. ... . . WHEREAS, Article XIII B of the Constitution of the Slate of California as proposed by the Initiative Measure approved by the people at the special statewide election held on November 6, 1979, provides that the total annual appropriations limit of each local government shall not exceed the appropriations limit of such entity for the prior year adjusted for changes in the cost of living and population except as otherwise specifically provided for in said Article; and, WHEREAS, the State Legislature added Division 9 (commencing with Section 7900) to Title 1 of the Government Code of the State of California to implement Article XIII B of the California Constitution; and, WHEREAS, Section 7910 of the Government Code provides that each year the governing body of each local jurisdiction shall, by resolution, establish its appropriations limit for the following fiscal year pursuant to Article XIII B at a regularly-scheduled meeting or a noticed special meeting and that fifteen (15) days prior to such meeting, documentation used in the determination of the appropriations limit shall be available to the public; and, WHEREAS, Section 7902 (a) of the Government Code sets forth the method for determining the appropriations limit for each local jurisdiction for the 1996-97 fiscal year; and, -1- r WHEREAS, the Board of Directors wish to establish the appropriations limit for fiscal year 1996-97 for the District. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. _of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER: Section 1: That it is hereby found and determined that the documentation used in the determination of the appropriations limit for County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, for fiscal year 1996-97, was available to the public in the Finance Department of said District at least fifteen (15) days prior to this date. Section 2: That the appropriations limit for fiscal year 1996-97 for County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, as established in accordance with Section 7902(a) of the California Government Code is $ which sum is within the maximum authorized spending limitation for fiscal year 1996-97. Section 3: That the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. _ of Orange County, California, has determined that the percent change in California per capita personal income from the preceding year would be the cost of living factor to be used in calculating the County Sanitation District No. _of Orange County, California's appropriations limit for the Fiscal Year 1996-97. Section 4: That the appropriations limit for fiscal year 1996-97 for County Sanitation District No. _of Orange County California, as established in accordance with Section 7902(b) of the California Government Code is $ which sum is within the maximum authorized spending limitation for fiscal year 1996-97. Section 5: The determination of the appropriation limit is based upon the best and most complete information available at this time. The District reserves the right to review and re-establish a new and different limit in the event that it subsequently determines that a modification of the limitation amount is appropriate. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 26, 1996. -2- JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING JUNE 26, 1996 Agenda Item (25): Consideration of actions re second reading and adoption of proposed Ordinances to increase capital facilities connection charges. Summary: At the April Joint Boards meeting, the Directors approved the Finance Administration and Human Resources Committee recommendation to increase capital facilities connection charges for1996-97. Prior to the action, the Committee Chair reported that each property connected to a sewer system in each of the Districts, except District No. 14, pays an annual sewer use fee which partially finances operating, maintenance and replacement (OM&R) costs used to fund sewerage system improvements. (Properties in District No. 14 are billed by the IRWD.) Each of those Districts, except District No. 13, also receives a share of the ad valorem property tax which is applied to debt service. New development must pay a one-time sewer connection fee which finances capital expansion of the sewerage system. Again, District No. 14 is the exception because IRWD pays its share of capital expansion. One-time annexation fees are charged to the owners of properties who desire to become a part of the Districts to receive sewerage service. The Districts' Resolutions and Ordinances governing the fees provide for an annual adjustment based upon changes in an Engineering News-Record - Los Angeles Construction Cost Index (ENRLA) from year-to-year. In the case of capital facilities connection fees, the proposed fees for each District will be $2,360 per residential unit, an increase of $10; and $472 per 1,000 square feet of commercial/industrial development, an increase of $2 per 1,000 square feet. Recommended Action The connection fee increase is subject to the Ordinance process. Motion is for a second reading and adoptionl of proposed ordinances. 4W PDOCIBS W G96V U N 96`625 05-15-96 04:05Pd FROM ROURKE, WOODRUFF, SPRA TO 9620356 P003/012 r DISTRICTS 1, 2, 3, 6, 11, 13 AND 14 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AMENDING SECTION 702 OF ORDINANCE NO. _ESTABLISHING WASTEWATER DISCHARGE REGULATIONS RELATING TO INCREASED CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION CHARGES The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No._of Orange County, California does hereby ORDAIN: Section : Fmdno. The Board of Direelors finds that the east of providing the service for which the Capital Faulitios Connection Charges are imposed, has increased since the establishment of the present fee In 1922, and the amoum of the increase set forth herein does not exceed the reasonable cost of providing the service. Sgd'o : Section 702 of Ordinance No._is hereby amended to read as follows: '702. DISTRICT NO. CAPITAL FAGLITIES CONNECTION CHARGES A. Dis rid Connecti�Required No application for a ponnit for a connection to a Dlstrici suwarago fatality or to arty sewerage fatality which discharges into a District sewerage facility shall be considered until a District capital facilities connection charge is paid by the applicant No connection permit shall be issued unless there is an established use of the property to be served tar a valid building permit issued which establishes the use of said property. B. District Connection Charge Amounts (1) Capital facilities connection charge for new construction. dwelling buldings: For each new dwelling unit constructed, the capital fatalities connection charge shall be$2,300 per dwelling unit (2) Capital facilities connection charge for existing dwelling buildings: For the connection of each wasting dwelling unit, the capital fatalities connection Charge shall be 12,360 per dwelling urnt > 05-15-96 04:05PM FROM ROURRE, WOODRUFF, SPRA TO 9620356 P004/012 1 (3) Capital facilities connection charge for new construction and existing structures, other than dwelling buildings: For all other new consaudton, induding, but not limited to, commercial and industrial buildings, hotels and motels and public buildings,the capital facilities connection charge shall be$460 per 1,000 square feet of floor area contained within such construction,provided that the minimum capital facilities connection charge for such new construction shall be$2,360. (4) Capital facilities connection charge for replacement buildings- For new construction replacing former buildings, the caphal facilities connection charge shall be calculated on the same basis as provided in paragraphs(1) and(3) above. If such replacement construction is commenced within two(2)years after demolition or destruclion of the former building, a credit against such charge shell be allowed and shall be the equivalent capital facilities connection charge for the building being demolished or destroyed, calculated on the basis of current charges for new construction. In no case shall such erodit exceed the capital facilities connecion charges. (5) Capital facilities conneclon charges for additions or alterations of existing buildings: In the case of structures where further new construction or alteration is made to increase the occupancy of family dwelling buildings or the area of buildings to be used for otherthan family dwelling buildings, the capital facilities connection charge shall be $2,360 for each dwelling unit added or created, and, in the case of now construction other than family dwelling buildings,it shall be$4a0 per 1,000 square feel of additional floor area contained within such new construction, provided such new construction shall contain additional plumbing fixture units." Section 3: Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect sitdy(60)days after adoption. 2 0E-15-96 04: C5FY FROM ROURKE, W00HUF'r, SFRA TO 962735E PC05/012 Y Beaton Severabll M If any provision of this Ordinance or the application to any person or circumstances is held invalid by order of Court,the remainder of the Ordinenee or the appOmtion of such provision to other persons or other circumstances shall not be affected. Section 5: Certification. The Secretary of the Board shall certify to the adoption of this Orcrinance and shall muse a summary to be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the District, as required by law. PASSED AND ADOPTED Dy the affirmative rote of not less than two-miras of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No._of Orange County, California, at a regular meeting held 1995. Chairman of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No._of Orange County. California ATTEST: Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No._ of Orange County, California 3 05-15-96 04:14PY FEOY EOUPEE, NOOUFUFF, sPRA TO 9620356 P002/003 DISTRICT NO. 5 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CAUFORNIA AMENDING SECTION 702 OF ORDINANCE NO. 525 FSTA13USHING WASTEWATER DISGFIARGE REGULATIONS RELATING TO INCREASED CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION CHARGES The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California does hereby ORDAIN: Section : Finftel. The Board of Directors finds that Ute cost of providing the service for which the Capital Facilities Connection Charges are imposed, has increased since the establishment of the present fee in 1992, and the amount of the increase set forth herein does not exceed Ute reasonable cost of providing the service. Se 'a 2: Section 702 of Ordinance No. 526 is hereby amended to read as follows: 702. D15TRICT NO CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION CHARGES A. District Conngction Permit Required No application for a permit for a connection to a District sewerage facility or to any sewerage faality which discharges into a District sewerage facility shall be considered until a District capital facilities connection charge is paid by the applicant. No connection permit shall be issued unless there is an established use of the property to be served or a valid bulairg permit issued which establishes the use of said property. B. District Connection Chame Amounts (1) Capital facilities connection charge for new construction, dwelling buildings: For each new dwelling unit constructed, the capital facilities connection charge shall be $2,360 per dwelling unit. (2) Capital facilities connection charge for existing dwelling buildings: For the connection of each existing dwelling unit, the capital facilities connection charge shall be $2,360 per dwelling urN. 1 05-15-96 04:05PM FROM ROURKE, WOODRUFF, 6PRA TO 9620356 POOVO12 (3) Capital facilities connection charge for new construction and existing structures, other than dwelling buildings: For all other new construction, inducting,but not limited to,commercial and industrial buildings, hotels and motels and pudic buildings, the capital facilities connection charge shall be$00 per 1,00D square feet of floor area contained within such construction, provided that the minimum capital facilities connection charge for such new conetraetion shall be 32.WU. (4) Capital facilities connection charge for replacement buildings: For new construction replacing former buildings, the capital f rcifdtes connection charge shall be calculated on the same basis as provided in paragraphs(1)and(3)above. 8 such replacement construction is commenced within two (2)years after demolition or destruction of the former building, a credit against such charge shell be allowed and shall be the equivalent capital facilities connection charge for the building being demolished or destroyed, calculated on the basis of current charges for new construction. In no ease shall such credit exceed the caphal facilities connection charges. (5) Capital facifitles connection charges for addrtions or alterations of existing buildings-- In the case of structures where further new wnstruceon or alteration is made to increase the occupancy of family dwelling buildings or the area of buildings to be used for other than family dwelling buildings,the capital facilities connection charge shall be$2,360 for each dwelling unit added or created, and, in the case of new construction other than family dwelling buildings, it shall be$480 per 1,000 square feat of additional floor area contained within such new construction, provided such new construction shall contain additional plumbing fodure units. 2 05-15-96 04:05PM FROM ROURRE, WOODRUFF, SPRA TO 9620356 P00E/012 Y (6) Payment of capital facilities connection charges shall be required at the time of Issuance of the building permit for all construction within the District, excepting in the case of a building legally exempt from the roqulromerd of obtaining a building permit in the City of Newport Beady. The payment of the capital facilities;connection charge for such exempt buildings win be required at the lime of, or prior to,the issuance of a plumbing connectio- permit for any construction within the District.` Section Effective Dale: This Ordinance shall lake effect sbcty(60) days after adoption. Section 4: Sevembili If any provision of this Ordinance or the application to any porson or circumstonces is hold invalid by ardor of Court, the remainder of the Ordinance or the application of such provision to other persons or other circumstances shall not be affected. Section 5: Certification. The Secretary of the Board shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shell cause a summary to be published in a newspaper of general circulation In the District, as required by law. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the affirmative veto of not less than twv-thirds of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, at a regular meeting held 1996. Chairman of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, Cafiforr a ATTEST: Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California 3 05-15-96 04:28PM FROM ROURKE, W000RUFF, SPRA TO 9620356 P902/002 DISTRICT NO. 7 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AMENDING SECTION 702 OF ORDINANCE NO. 727 ESTABLISHING WASTEWATER DISCHARGE REGULATIONS RELATING TO INCREASED CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION CHARGES The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California does hereby ORDAIN: Section 1: Findin . The Board of Directors finds that the cost of providing the service for which the Capital Facilities Connection Charges are imposed, has increased since the establishment of the prnsont fan in 1992, and the amount of the Increase sat forth herein does not exceed the reasonable cost of providing the service. Section 2: Section 702 of Ordinance No. 727 is hereby emended to read as follows: 702. DISTRICT NO. CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION CHARGES A pis nnection Pem7it RemUlre6 No application for a permit for a connection to a District sewerage facility or to any sewerage facility which discharges into a District sewerage facility shall be considered until a District capital facr7'Ities connection charge is paid by the applimnt No connection pormit shall be issued unless there is an established use of the property to be served or a valid building permit issued which establishes the use of said property. B. District Conne0on Charon Amcurds (1) Capitol facilities connection charge for new construction, dwelling buildings: For each new dwelling unit constructed, the capital facilities connection charge shall be{2,3e0 per dwelling unit. (2) capital tecilnies connection charge for existing dwelling buildings: For the connection of each existing dwelling unit, the capital facilities connection charge shall be $2,360 per dwelling unit. 1 05-15-96 04:05PM FROM ROURKE. WOODRUFF, SPRA TO 9620356 P310/012 (3) Capital facilities connection charge for new construction and existing structures, other than dwelling buildings: For a0 other new construction, including, but not 16nited to, commercial and industrial buildings, hotels and motels and public buildings, the capital facilities connection rhargo shall be$480 par 1,000 square feet of floor area contained within such construction, provided that the minimum Capital facilities connection charge for such new Construction Shall be$2.360. (4) Capital facilities connection charge for replacement buildings: For now construction replacing fomrer buildings, the Capital facilities connection charge shag be calculated on the same basis as provided in paragraphs (1)and (3) above. If such replacement construction is commenced within two (2)years after demolition or destruction of the former building, a credit agalnst such charge shall be allowed and shall be the equivalent capital facilities connection Charge for the building being demolished or destroyed, calculated on the basis of ruurrem charges for new construction In no ease shall such credit exceed the capital facilities connection charges. (5) Capital facilities connection charges for additions or alterations of existing buildings: In the case of structures where further new construction or alteration is made to increase the occupancy of family dwelling buildings or the area of buildings to be used for otherthen family dwelling buildings, the capital fa tlitias connection charge shall be $2,360 for each dwelling unit added or created, and, in the case of new construction other than family,dwelling buildings, it shag be$480 per 1,000 square feet of additional floor area contained within such new construction, provided such new construction shall contain additional plumbing forture units. 2 05-15-96 04:05PM FROM ROURHE, WOODRUFF, SPRA TO 9620356 P011/012 (6) Truck capital facilities connection charge, residential uses: Family dwelling unit: $6 per frond foot for the real property fronting on and connecting to a trunk sewer, provided that no such charge shall be less than $400, plus the applicable regular capital facilities connection charge for dwelling units heramabove specified. (n Trunk capital facilities connection charge, commercial or industrial establishments: $10 per front foot for the real property fronting on and connecting to a trunk sewer. provided that no such front foot charge shall be less than$500 plus the applicable regular capital facilities connection charge for new construction and eristing structures other than dwelling buildings hereinabove specfred. (6) Capital facilities connection charge, off-site sewers not a part of Master Plan relative to roimbumemont agreement The charges for Connections to off-site sewers which are not included as part of the District Master Plan and for which a Non-Master Plan Reimbursement Agreement has been entered into between the District and the property owner shall be in the amount provided for in said Agreement- The amount set forth in said Agreement shall be the amount due whether the original Agreement is still In force, has been extended, or has expired. The capital facdities connection charges shag be in addition to any other charges hereinabove established for the property connecting to said facilities. (9) Assessment District capital facilities connection charge: The regular capital facilities connection charges provided in the preceding subsections of this section, plus a sum of money equal to the assessment charge without bdarast, or Tmasurefs charge which would have been made against the real property on which said improvements are located had said real property been assessed 3 05-15-96 04:05PM FROM ROURKE, W000RUFF, SPRA TO 9620356 P012/012 i within the Assessment District which constructed or acquired the Assessment District sewer to which connection is made. 8egjony: t=ffective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect sixty(60) days after adoption. Section 4: SevemWity If any provision of this Ordinance or the application to any person or circumstances Is held invalid by order of Court, the remainder of the Ordinance or the application of such provision to other persons or other circumstancas shell not be affected. gnrfinnn s QeffffIgatka The Secretary of the Board shall ceNry to the adoption of this Ordinance and shell cause a summary to be published in a newspaper of general Circulation in the District, as required by law. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the affirmative vote of not less than two-thirds of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, at a regular meeting held 199G. Chairman of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, Callfomle ATTEST' Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County. California 4 ,m June, 1996 .. Q, zRAN_SMITTAL MEMO FOR FY'96-9ZWORK PLAN _ TO: Board of Directors FROM: Don McIntyre 2t - General Manager p SUBJECT: Critical Goals Statement and Work Plan for FY '96-97 It is my pleasure to submit the FY '96-97 Goals Statement and Work Plans for the Districts. Detailed below are the seven critical goals for FY '96-97. This goals statement also appears in your FY'96-97 Proposed Budget. Ensure that the Districts are competitive by improving productivity through proactive manpower planning and the application of technology. • Increase the efficiency and effectiveness of compliance with regulatory requirements for NPDES and other permits by improving monitoring and analytical activities to better understand and explain impacts of Districts' operations. • Develop a strategic plan which meets the future needs of the service area through appropriate capital investment and environmental stewardship. • Protect employees and the environment by developing and implementing comprehensive and cost-effective safety systems, policies and procedures. ► • Implement Communications programs that support the Districts' mission, promote understanding of our future endeavors and build stronger working relationships with our varied audiences. • Provide employee support and training to ensure that the Districts have a trained and flexible work force. eo Improve management performance by establishing accountability at the cost-center level and using performance measurement and bench-marking to enhance productivity. Once these goals were defined, a series of sub-tasks were developed with lead responsibility assigned to either Administration or Operations. In some instances there is joint responsibility. This information was organized into a matrix which is included with this introduction. Work plans are prepared at the Division level of the organization and have been specifically ,d designed to carry out the critical goals of the organization. This is a cornerstone in our effort toward creating a more performance-based organization. Department Heads, Division Heads, Managers, Supervisors, and Professionals will be held accountable for delivering these goals r CSDOC 0 P 0 Box 8127 • FOW.ln V011ey CA 9222E-0127 0 17141 962-2e11 Board of Directors Page 2 June, 1996 and sub-tasks in accordance with the milestones set forth in the work plans. At the end of the next fiscal year, they will be evaluated on the basis of their performance on the work plans. FY '96-97 promises to be an extremely challenging year. The continuation of our efforts on the Strategic Plan, the implementation of the Financial Information System, the re-engineering of Operations and Maintenance to promote improved productivity and workforce Flexibility, and the acceleration of plant automation are just some of our important projects for the year. There are many others, as you will see when you read through this Work Plan. The work plans will be monitored on a quarterly basis and we will report our progress to you on a quarterly basis as c well. We look forward to making excellent progress on a very ambitious work plan. DFM:cmc JAWPDOMMU MICORRES96W1196.M1 Attachment r Critical Goals For Fiscal Year 1996-97 Develop eud I eslmnure ocean Complete elutly and Devafap Produce high quality ImPlenl.in employee Evaluate implement onitoring program implamente new an Integrate! Iedlileslmpebilties rmngaillan entl boned-bending ment. mm litheness retlum duplication finendalprogrem Emergent pe p Y brochure wellnros programs antl akllhneaetl pay plan Steil entl Response Plan ullent egorrs Cam tale the ocean Develop n- Communications,gramu Improve PRIDE Elmp...nt mllall aseaesmenl In use an Re milt slrateplae entl Program 08M orBenizallon, Negotiate changes entldofineoplla- Intluelriat HyBbne programs to support procedures and In monitoring for rehebiland!n Monitoring Program entl promote l emenla in our entl enhalgetl and predicea r°a°r campalHhenev plan [.h lemem Y omen tlischerge repactlY prehensive Condud Eeladith outreach ty tralnln8 Ilexbilby.lergel dale Nestle Assessment ram to mealDevelop Complete oudall for HezeMom programs for city a and o meetntl implement clening operation Energy Control ofgdale and slate uletiom Implement Plant Automation Procedures legislature;Orange FlS system Plan County broiness Cmrdtnate with Awed-nmad for Implement SCCWRP to Improve Irealmen,rartudes Continue Implement Internal Initiate Rmnginear regional monitoring reeler planning Dlslrids�wide Safely and external Departments podormance basstl Atlminlelrelbn earls Policy Review canmunimlbro Trelnirg Progrems budgeting function-, Committee programs to support procedures and Inlllae a water practices Nwthlp new mroervallon study entl promote Implemem lMivitlrel Information products Provltleomline strategic planning Trdning Paughm, Ti.management to commummale Melea (Solely Data Process for all employees evaluation to woM Dldrlds'mmpllenm Continue reclaralem Shcel tlata base plan padamanm Integrate cwnyuler Through formal performance lesstbilily efforts Evaluate system to link-sere Implement ealwtbn process with OCWD egecthrenese d entl gain on-line Cavllning entl amass to data base °mplOy°B Proasdralntrg Hold unimlbnc p Carotid eglclenc %wort quarterly �arnsb Program Y floes Workahogma pna9 y studies-thous,re. Inventory employee review,work progress condudlnB midyear Imhouae reeouroea skills and mn,iilble and to gulden Internal Publish Annual Insaurcin Communkalions g pmgrem pollcY gudence Training Calendar Autlil (a uhed-leduled Improve FY'9T trainingpome- Degne starting Deveop bu ineae entl probed delivery prolactments;r all loohnprogram rogr ml o maintain develop fir.- highpmlomalnleln Implement develop llva�year high pedormenee oenlnelixetl lraeNinp manpower plan In Source Control system and defense M All Department Nestle Eslablleh mmmunily Implement Training Promote regulation oulreachlo AdmIniti Initiation In the lead monit and legislation to communicate onCas System improve poxuramen DisddApermb mor ennd dla troth Operations In the lead flextbllily and!wmN and mmpllance mat-by Department P pradims efficiency perbrmanm end training category w con «ceooc t H ! H ! fl fl II fl fl fl fl H H H fl fl fl fl General Manager's Office FY '96 - '97 WORK PLAN x i' M Goal Qn- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responslble Board T� " xavni✓ k z,k�ckfAl la. Develop and Implement competitiveness plan Yes Tasks: ia.1 Establish and manage competitiveness x X Anderson/ executive oversight committee Wilson ia.2 Establish and manage employee x x Department competiveness teams Managers la.3 Maintain ongoing consultation(including x Human meet and confer,when appropriate)with Resources represented employee groups 1 a.4 Secure consultant services to facilitate X x Dolan development of competitiveness plan and complete plan. 1a.5 Monitor and participate in efforts by AMSA x Anderson/ and other organizations dealing with Ooten competitiveness la.6 Monitor, participate in, and incorporate as X Andersonl appropriate, in-county efforts of Wilson reorganization, reinvention and consolidation J:kW DOC\GM\BANDERSO\GOALSTY9697 GLS Page 1 of 17 Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 1a.7 Work with GSA to develop marketing X Wilson strategies for at least two facilities management services. 1a.8 Work with Internal Audit Team and GSA to % Wilson/Mathews complete feasibility study for marketing collections services to other local jurisdictions. 1b. Reengineer O&M organization, procedures and Yes practices Tasks, 1b.1 Evaluate job tasks for required skills and X Anderson/ proficiencies. Organize them in hierarchy Ooten and determine ability to make cross- assignments between work groups and job classes 1b.2 Evaluate repetitive job tasks for needed X Anderson/ frequency and develop plan to decrease or Ooten Increase frequency, as appropriate 1b.3 Evaluate job tasks for competiveness with X Anderson/ alternative methods of delivery Including out- Ooten sourcing 1 b.4 Complete assignments of supervisory X Anderson/ responsibilities of O&M work force at each Ooten Plant 1b.5 Monitor and evaluate effectiveness of X Anderson/ supervisory assignments during this first Ooten fiscal year J:IWPDOC\GM\BANDERSO\GOALSTY9697.GLS Page 2 of 17 -_ r - r . r If r t — r r e r r-_ U : t IF t r U- r- Goal On- 7st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 1b.6 Utilize all-hands meetings and other X Anderson/ methods to provide regular and Dolan comprehensive two-way communication between managers and employees 1 b.7 Provide comprehensive list of X Anderson/ recommendations to enhance Districts' Ooten competitiveness 1b.8 Conduct special-request studies in X Mathews/ Operations'costs, RE: CenGen and Air Anderson Products as requested by the COO. 1 b.9 Conduct special-request studies in X Mathews/Ooten Operations &Maintenance Department as requested by Director. 1b.10 Prepare recommendations for FY'98 budget X Anderson which result in 5%cost reduction in Operating Departments. 1c. Develop and Implement Plant Automation Plan Yes as s 1c.1 O&M Department provide input and staffing X Anderson/ support, as necessary,to Information Dothan Technology's lead in developing and implementing automation plan 1c.2 Engineering Department provide input and X Anderson/ staffing support, as necessary to Information Ludwln Technology's lead in developing and Implementing automation plan J'\WPDOC\GMSANDERSO\GOALS1FY9697.GLS Page 3 Of 17 MltesMiies Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 1c.3 Chair Plant Automation Plan executive X X Anderson review committee 1c.4 Develop customer survey process for end X Anderson/ users of automated systems and Hodges Incorporate, as appropriate, Input tc.5 Work with GSA and Plant Automation Team X Wilson to develop expedited Plant Automation Plan for three year Implementation with cosVbenefit analysis and capital Investment plan. 1c.6 Work with GSA and Plant Automation Team X Wilson/Hodges to complete J-31 project,and Implement automation for Headworks at Plant 2. 1d. Reenglneer Administration funtlons, Yes procedures and practices. Tasks 1d.1 Prepare recommendations for FY'98 budget X Wilson/ which result in 5%cost reduction in Mathews Administrative departments. le. Integrate computer system to link users and No gain on-line access to data bases. Tasks le.1 Review CMMS program utilization and how it X Mathews/ can improve wrench-on-bolt performance. HodgeslOoten If. Define staffing projections for all departments; Yes develop five-year stalling plan Tasks J:WJPDOC\GM\BANDERSOIGOALSIFY9997.GLS Pepe 4 of 17 I IF t t r t C t t C- U_ C" C-' C:_- t- E- F_ r r r t 9 fl Q 4 t H H 9 t O t t Q t a fl t iMA� i Goal on- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 1f.1 Each department manager, in consultation X Anderson/ with staff and others, provide draft five-year Department forecast of projects, programs and practices Heads that drive staffing requirements 1f.2 Combine efforts of all departmental studies X Andersonf to find cross-training and transfer Department opportunities, highly loaded years vs. lightly Heads loaded years and determine overall staffing demands . lf.3 Convene meetings with staff and X Anderson/ supervisors to finalize five-year staffing plan Department Heads 1fA Finalize staffing plan and convey to Board X Anderson/ for approval Department Heads 1g. Promote regulation and legislation to Improve Yes procurement flexibility and work practices efficiency Tas 1g.1 With Safety as lead, evaluate our work X Josway/Esquerl practices related to industrial safety orders ArhonteslHelnz/ of Cal OSHA and NIAOSH, determine Jones needed changes in Cal and fed regulations and convey our recommendations as appropriate J:IWPDOCIGMIBANDERSO\GOALS\FY9e97.GLS Page 5 of 17 U116 Goal on, 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 1g.2 With Engineering as lead, evaluate our X Andersonl public works procurement procedures, Ludwinl determine needed changes in California law, Woodruff and convey our recommendations as appropriate 1g.3 With Purchasing and Contracts as lead, X Dubois evaluate our materials and services procurement procedures, determine needed changes in California law, and convey our recommendations as appropriate 1g.4 Establish executive oversight of the review Andersonl and advocacy process and, in particular, Wilson §§••y,� Involve General Counsel in the process. 2a.0 Restructure ocean monitoring program to No reduce duplication of staff and consultant efforts Tas 2a.1 Provide review and oversight of activities of X Anderson Technical Services Department 2a.2 Attend negotiations meetings X Andersonl Wheatley 2b. Negotiate changes In monitoring requirements No In our ocean discharge permit to add flexibility, target data needs and Improve cost effectiveness Tas s J:\WPDOC\GM\BANDERSO\GOALSTYSBa7.GLS Page 8 of 17 fl ! 4 fl A A fi A A A fl A A N A fl t � A fl Goal I QD- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 2b.1 Provide review and oversight of activities of X Anderson Technical Services Department 2b.2 Provide Communications and public X Wilson/ outreach support for 301(h)permit. Tuchman 2c. Coordinate with SCCWRP to Improve regional No monitoring efforts sk$ 2c.1 Recommend SCCWRP convene meeting to X Anderson/ kick-off regional meetings Wheatley 2c.2 Perform'multi-media"presentations to staff, X Mathews Board, and external memberships on Performance Measurement programs, as assigned. 2d. Develop new Information products to No communicate Districts'compliance performance asks 2d.1 Review and oversee Technical Services, X Anderson working in cooperation with Communications Office, develop information products for electeds, board, general public and business J:\WPDOC\GMIBANDERSO\GOALSTY999'!GLS Page 7 of 17 ;,, `IMestd' Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr I 3rd Qtr I 4th Qtr I going Responsible Board 2d.2 Assist Technical Services in the X Mathews development and monitoring of useful performance measurements. 5;1RATECi1C PLAN ? y w gym :. I 3a. Complete study and Implement a new financial Yes program asks 3a.1 O&M Department provide customer Input to X Andersonl Finance Department as financial program is Outten developed 3a.2 Engineering Department provide CIP X Andersonl projections to Finance Department so that Ludwin financial program can be developed to meet the CIP needs 3a.3 Technical Services Department provide X Anderson/ customer input to Finance Department as Wheatley financial program is developed 3a.4 Work with Finance, Engineering and the X WllsonlStreed consultants to review methodology for user fee recommendations. 3b. Complete the ocean outfall assessment and Yes define options for rehabilitation and enhanced capacity asks 3b.1 Review activities of Engineering Department X Anderson overseeing this goal. J:WWPDOC\GM\BANDERSO\GOALSTY9691.GLS page e W 17 c c= r. - c7 t- t- t t t t t [ a e t t t t e t a [ t Q a l ester a� Goal Q"- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 491 Qtr going Responsible Board 3c. Complete ouffall cleaning operation Tasks 3c.1 Review activities of Engineering Department X Anderson overseeing this goal. 3d. Award contract for treatment facilities master Yes planning asks 3d.1 Review activities of Engineering Department X Anderson taking lead to complete this task. 3d.2 Work with Engineering and their consultants X Wilson/Mathews to review demographic data and methodology to ensure flow projections are sound. 3d.3 Provide for peer review of demographic X Wilson data. 3e. Initiate a water conservation study No L,tsks 3e.1 Review Districts'previous water X Dawes conservation efforts conducted in early 1999s with cities and with domestic users 3e.2 Review Districts' ongoing water conservation X Wheatley/ efforts targeting industrial and commercial Dawes users J1WPDOCIGMIBANDERSOIGOALSIFY9697.GLS Page 9 of 17 Memo Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 3e.3 Develop relationship with MWDOC and other X X Anderson/ water interests with the assumption we take Dolan subordinate role in OC water conservation efforts 3f. Continue reclamation feasiblity efforts with Yes OCWD Tasks 31.1 Incorporate water conservation efforts into X Dawes Strategic Plan 3f.2 Maintain liaison with OCWD X Anderson/ Ludwin 3f.3 Incorporate reclamation into Strategic Plan X Dawes 3g. Hold quarterly Board Workshops to review Yes work progress and to provide policy guidance sks 3g.1 In cooperation with GAO, maintain X Anderson/ substantive three-way(Board, staff and Wilson/Dawes public) process in workshops 3g.2 Each department provide input to workshops X Department as needed Heads 3g.3 Develop calendar of subjects for quarterlies X Dawes that tie-back to activities of consultants and other relevant considerations 3g.4 Develop strategy for public outreach. X Wilson/ Tuchman .edwbocr.~NDERSO%G ALSlPveas7.txs Page 10 of 17 c- r- c I - t _ IL c r-- [_ r U r _ c_- V r- t_- t- is r- Milestones Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 3g.5 Plan quarterly Board workshops. X Wilson/ �s Tuchman 4a. Continue Districts-wide safety Policy Review No Committee Tasks 4a.1 O&M and Engineering Departments to X Anderson/ provide ongoing participation in and advise Josway/Ootenl to Safety Office in evaluating Districts safety Ludwin program and associated work practices 4a.2 Provide recommendations for changes X Anderson/ Josway/Ootenl Ludwin 5. CUSTOMER SERVICESCOMMDNIOATIONS M 5a. Develop communications strategies and No programs to support and promote competitiveness plan Tasks 5a.1 Provide management support to X "Isont Communications Director to ensure all FY Tuchman '97 goals and objectives are met. 5b. Implement Internal and external No communications programs to support and promote strategic planning process Tasks J:X PDOC%GMXBANDERSOMOALSTY9697.GLS Page 11 of 17 y f, Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 5b.1 Meet at least quarterly with Communications X X X X Wilson Action Team. Sc. Evaluate effectiveness of employee Yes communications programs by conducting mid- year Internal Communications Audit ask SO Provide Board with quarterly X X X X Wilson/ communications updates, Including the Tuchman results of the mid-year internal communications audit. Sol. Develop business technical assistance No program to maintain high performance In source control efforts of business community while minimizing cost Impacts on business Tasks 5d.1 Provide general oversight and review of X Anderson activities of Technical Services Department Se. Establish community outreach to communicate No Districts' permit and compliance performance ask 5e.1 Review activities of Technical Services and X Anderson Communications Department ,a ..,�. _ ... $ EMP1iDY6t,'s 3UPPbRT'&TRAINING' •a 6a. Implement employee recognition and wellness Yes programs Tasks J:\WPOOC\GMIBANeERSO\GOALSTY9699.GLS Page 12 of 17 Goal Q"- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr I 4th Qtr f goingj Responsible Board 6a.1 Work with HR to develop employee X Wilson/Elsman/ recognition and wellness programs. Peterman 6a.2 Prepare gain-sharing recommendations for X Wllsonl negotiations with unions. Peterman 6b. Improve PRIDE program Yes Tasks 6b.1 With O&M as lead, form a committee of X Dolan supervisors and staff to evaluate present strengths of PRIDE program 6b.2 Evaluate gain sharing as an adjunct to or % AndersonlOoten replacement for PRIDE program Wilson/ Peterman 6b.3 Complete recommendation for future of the x Anderson/Ooten PRIDE program Wilson/ Peterman Sc. Implement comprehensive safety training Yes program to meet state and federal regulations ask 6c.1 Work with Safety and Emergency Response X Wilson/ to develop alternative work procedures for Josway/special use in confined space. Quantity potential task force labor savings. 6c.2 Ensure that Integrated Emergency X Wllson/Josway Response Plan, Industrial Hygiene Monitoring Program and Needs Assessment for Hazardous Energy Control procedures are completed by the close of FY'97. J:1wPDOC1GMIBANDERSO\GOALSWY96e/.GLS Page 13 of 17 IF- Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going I Responsible Board 6d. Implement Departmental Training Programs Yes Tasks 6d.1 With Training Manager as lead, and with the X Andersonl input of consultants and departmental stag, Wilson review proposed training program for each department 6d.2 Convey training program recommendations X WilsonlElsman to Board of Directors for budgetary authorization, as appropriate. 6d.3 Work with the Executive Management Team X Wilson to ensure that Departmental Training Plans are in place by the close of the 2nd quarter. 6e. Implement Individual training programs for all No employees Leaks 6e.1 Develop and implement career guidance and X Andersonl consultation program for all employees Wilson/ Peterman 6e.2 Using five-year staffing plan as guidance, X Department develop inventory of agency-wide needs for Heads/ employee skills Eisman 6e.3 Develop priorities and budget X 6f. Implement Retraining and Cross-Training No Program Tasks 6f.1 Review ongoing activities X Anderson J:IWPDOC1GM1eANDERSO\GOALSTY9e97.GLS Page 14 of 17 I Mf/estones Goal Qn- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 6f.2 Work with Operations and Maintenance and X Wlisonl Elsman/ Training Division to expedite Implementation Cullen of cross training program. 6g. Publish Annual Training Calendar for Yes scheduled FY '97 training Tasks 6g.1 Provide the Board with quarterly training X X X X Wilson/Elsman updates. 6h. Implement centralized tracking system and No database Tasks 6h.1 Develop Districts-wide Skills Bank working X Wilson/Elsman with Training Division. -7. MANAGEMENTPERFORMANCE 7a. Evaluate broad-banding and skill-based pay Yes ask 7a.1 Prepare presentation on Bmadbanding, X Wilson/McKinley Secure Board approval for RFP for IPetermanl classification study. Tuchman 7a.2 Secure agreement for skill based pay from X Wllsonl Board and unions. Peterman 7b. Implement a performance measurement Yes monitoring and productivity Improvement program Tasks J\W DOC\GM\BANDERSO\GOALST-Y9697.GLS Page 15 of 17 Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 7b.1 Prepare quarterly presentations to the Board X X X X Wllson/Mathews on performance measurement and /Tuchman productivity Improvement program. 7b.2 Write quarterly"Pipeline"article defining X X X X Mathews "State-of-the-art"Performance Measurement Programs. Publicize existing District successes. 7c. Implement FIS system Yes Tasks 7c.1 Implement Financial Information System. X Wilson/Streedl While 7d. Initiate performance-based budgeting No Tasks 7d.1 Ensure Fiscal Year 1997/98 Performance X X Mathews No Objective statements are coordinated and achievable. 7e. Tie management evaluation to work plan No performance thru formal evaluation process T sks 7e.1 Review ongoing activities X Anderson) Wilson 7e.2 Conduct meetings at least quarterly with X X X X Wilson Department Heads to review progress on FY '97 workplans. J:lwaoo=MV%ANl)ERs01G0ALSTY9e97.OLs page 16 of 17 C L U7 C C [_ Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 7e.3 Ensure that MPRP fortes are completed X Anderson/ based upon performance on annual work Wilson/ plans. Dept Heads 7f. Conduct efficiency studies using In-house No resources Tasks 7f.1 Work with GSA to implement X Wilson/Mathews recommendations of Information Technology /Hodges Management Audit. 7f.2 Implement Internal Audit Team. X Wilson/Mathews 7f.3 Conduct a minimum of four major X Wilsonl management studies. Mathews 7g. Improve CIP process and project delivery No Tasks 7gA Conduct Engineering Staffing StudylCIP X Mathews/ review to determine appropriate resource Ludwln requirements in Planning, Design& Construction. 7g.2 Review Engineering Department Proposals X Anderson for improvement. 7g.3 Develop improved C.I.P. process. X Wilson/Streed J:IWPDOC\GMIBANDERSOIGOALSTY969]GLS Page 17 of 17 L ! _ ll�-- IL. IL C: III ' C _' 9[ _I pg VIL lir— y,W- BOARD SECRETARY'S OFFICE FY '96 - '97 WORK PLAN Milestones Goal On- Responsible 1st Qtr 2nd Qh 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Staff Board 1. Develop agenda package preparation time line and complete 80%of projected milestones on a monthly basis. Prepare an analysis of milestones not met. es s: 1.1 Develop monthly time line. % Kyle 1.2 Implement monthly time line. X X 1t 1t X Kyle/amylJonk 1.3 Prepare analysis of milestones not met. x X X X X Kyle/Gray/Jonk 2. Monitor through daily time logs filing of monthly agenda-generated kerns,completing q R t �"� ^I 90%within 30 days following Board meeting. "z� , ASI as—kV 1 yM 2.1 Include In dally 0me log 01ing of agenda- X X % K 1t Gmy/Jonk generated hems. 2.3 Submit daily 0me lags to Board Secretary X X K X X OraytJonk weekly.. 91WPLNX L Page 1 of 7 BOARD SECRETARY'S OFFICE FY '96 - '97 WORK PLAN Milestones Goal I On- Responsible 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going staff Board 1. Develop agenda package preparation time line and complete 80%of projected milestones on a monthly basis. Prepare an analysis of milestones not met. as s: 1.1 Develop monthly time line. X Kyle 1.2 Implement monthly time line. X X X X X KylelGmylJonk 1.3 Prepare analysis of milestones not met. % % X % X KylelGrayl.lonk 2. Monitor through daily time logs filing of monthly agend"enerated Items,completing 90%within 30 days following Board meeting. asks' 2.1 Include In daily tlme log filing of agenda- X X X E X GraylJonk generated items. 2.3 Submit daily tlme logs to Board Secretary X X x X X GmylJonk weekly.. B\WPDXVL Page 1 of 7 Milestones C7O8� On- Responsible 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Staff Board 3. Develop Agenda Procedures Manual through the Agenda Task Force Committee so that manual Is completed 07131196. . Tasks 3.1 Table of Contents finalized X Kyle/A.T.F. 3.2 Determine format for Information X 3.3 Assign major sections to Board Secretary X and Executive Assistants In A.T.F. 3.4 Board Secretary and Executive Assistants to X Kyle/A.T.F. spin remaining Secretades/Clerks to work in groups. Delegate portions of assigned section to Secratades/Clerks with deadline dates. 3.5 Board Secretary and Executive Assistants to X KyWEAs complete remaining portions of assigned section with deadline dates. 3.6 Board Secretary and Executive Assistants to X KytelEAs meet oft-site for 1-2 days to review,edt and finalize all major sections 3.7 Submit to Xerox for duplication(50 sets). X Kyle 3.8 Present to Executive Management for Anal X KyleiEAs review and approval. 3.9 Incorporate changes/deletionsladdnions as X KylelEAs directed by Executive Management. Resubmit to Xerox for duplication. Distribute to designated employees. �.'ylYPD1.KYL Paps 2 of T 1E z.- C - t__ (7 C" [ t. _ c_ t-- C t" B O H t 8 p t 9 t B Q B 9 t t 0 t 1 Milestones Goal On- Responsible 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Staff Board 3.10 Begin preparation of presentation and slides, x X Kylelruchman and set up presentation schedules with I Eisman/A.T.F. designated employees. 3.11 Monitor and Incorporate changes as needed X x x x Kyle/A.T.F. on an on-going quarterly basis to Include survey of effectiveness of written procedures. 4. Finalize fees to be charged to general public toIn receive agenda packages. Present to Boardsof Directors for approval and implementation.asks s..:r` 11 4.1 Determine average number of pages of x Gray/Jonk monthly agenda packages and postage. 4.2 Prepare staff report analyzing x Kyle Implementation of fees and cost of stairs time to Implement fee schedule(notice, Invoicing, mongodng). 4.3 Submit Staff Report and Resolution to_ X Kyle/General committee for review and approval. Counsel 4.4 Submit to Joint Boards Meeting for approval x KyleMtllson Yes and adoption of Resolution. 4.4 Notice and invoice General Public currently x x Kyle/Gray/Jonk on malting list on an annual basis beginning January 1, 1997. B:\WPLN.KYL Page 3 of 7 Milestones Goal On- Responsible 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going staff Board 5. Become knowledgeable of records management principles to determine and evaluate our critical records management needs and Investigate potential solutions to records management problems. Became Informed with the various methods that could be utilized prior to a consultant analyzing our current records management system. ask 5.1 Participate as members of ARMA. Attend % X X X K KyWGmylJonk monthly meetings and seminars. 5.2 Participate as members of IAC for Local X X X X X KylelGmylJonk Government. Attend bi-monthly meetings and seminars. 5.3 Participate in Special Districts Committee re X % X X X KyWGmylJonk Records Management(coordinated by OCWD). 5.4 Work with Information Technology in the X X X X K KylelGraylJonkl exploration of various automated systems Mike Herrera that would be compatible wHh current software. 5.5 Re-examine current Records Management R X X KylelOmylJonkl policy and evaluate critical records needs. General Counsel Determine methods of archiving Information and methods of destruction for various types of documents. Determine if consultant should be hired to assist In revising current policy. OMPLK.KYL Pape 4 of 7 r (- r r r (_ (- r- E7 r- U- c- c -- r- c_-. t F7 r- Milestones Goal On- Responsible 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Staff Board 5.6 Obtain Records Management Policies from X x X KylelGmyfJonk organizations for analysis and comparison. Determine what other agencies keep In 'official files'. 5.7 List series of files maintained by Board X X KylelGmylJonkl Secretary and Identify those series to be General Counsel considered vital records. 5.8 Meet and observe agencieslcldes with X X X X KylelGreylJonk automated Records Management Programs. 6. Assist Human Resources staff Involved in monitoring Conflict of Interest filings for �,�,I €� z ,, designated employees by participating in the . -� & �> kd Fe 2 , @ .� development of standardized procedures. as �''U 6.1 Provide Human Resources staff with sample R KylefJonk form lagers and written procedures to be followed 6.2 Review and discuss written procedures X KyletJonk prepared by Human Resources stag for compliance. 6.3 Provide annually updated documents for all X JonklGrey filings due after January t. 6.4 Coordinate with Human Resources staff to X x X X x JonklGray guarantee receipt of designated employees' filings In the Board Secretary's Office. B?WPLN.KY'L Page 5 of 7 Milestones Goal on. Responsible 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Staff Board FE- 7. Provide employees with Official Joint Board Minutes and Agendas through readlprint only capabilities on the network global directory. - - Tasks 7.1 Coordinate with Information Technologies to X X JonklGmyl set up global directory file and security Information measures to enable access to reedlpdnt Technology only. 7.2 Place 1995 and 1996 Joint Board Agendas X and Minutes on global directory. 7.3 Implement on-going Joint Board Agendas X X % % Jonk/Gray and Minutes onto global directory. tetrrptttxn Ppe a d7 Milestones Goal On- Responsible 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Staff Board S. Continue preparation and cross-reference of files with copies of easements and grant deeds as directed by General Counsel. ass 8.1 Review files(agreement,construction) and X X X X X Kyle/Jonk/Gmy pull those containing easements/grant deeds. Implement Into section designated for easemenWgrant deeds. 8.2 Crosscheck recording document listing for X X X X X Kyte/Jonk/Oray recording information and add documents not listed. 8.3 Create official side-tab files and organize all x x x x x KyWJonk/Gmy easements/grant deeds by District. Cross- reference by date/contract. 8.4 Incorporate new easements/grant deeds Into x x x x x Kyle/Jonk/Omy sold process. B:IWPLN.KVL Page 7 of 7 COMMUNICATIONS DEPARTMENT FY '96 - '97 WORK PLAN Goal On- 1 at Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board gy Or MEN ow MEN 1.1 Plan and coordinate quarterly Board Workshops. X X X X X Tuchman Action 1.2 Create and maintain external stakeholders list. X X Tuchman None 1.3 Establish external stakeholders consultation Tuchman/ process. X X Consultants None 1.4 Produce quarterly newsletter for external Tuchman/ audiences. X X X X Staff None 1.5 Organize external audiences briefing Tuchman/ mechanisms. X Consultants None 1.6 Develop external communications protocol and stakeholder interaction. X Tuchman None 1.7 Support consultants in public outreach efforts. X Tuchman None 1.8 Develop and distribute internal Tuchmanl communications vehicles. X Staff None 1'lwpdocicommocc\goals�workplan.sam Page 1 of 9 Goal on, �z XX 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Otter going Responsible Board F,< �i( )W 90� a kfi a� 63 'gZ d� t ' .I- � k, 2.1 Work with Training Division to develop Tuchmanl communications tools that support and Elsmanl enhance cross-training efforts. X O&M None 2.2 Work with GSA to develop communications tools that Inform and instruct staff on Tuchmanl automation efforts. X Hodges None 2.3 Provide marketing support to profit- Tuchmanl generating operations. X Hodges None 3.. Assist in 361 (h)fen (efforts by providing or coordinating comprehensiveTIM communlcatlona that support Oistdcts public participation and due diligence efforts whiloalso koeping staff Informed of progress � k5s ' � . +f� •- ; , 3.1 Coordinate intemage temal efforts with Tuchmanl None Technical Services. x X Wheatley 3.2 Coordinate roundtable meetings with stakeholders. X Tuchman None 3.3 Work with outside consultants(if required). X X Tuchman None gMpdarsain mseftonIswad`phnmin Pegs 2 019 C" C . [ - [: : L i L_.. t— t_,. t_ C . t t a t a a Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 4.1 Improve format and content of The News Tuchmanl Pipeline. X McNellyl Graphic Svcs None 4.2 Establish new production method for The Tuchmanl News Pipeline. McNally/ X Graphic Svcs None 4.3 Organize General Manager's Quarterly Tuchmanl Management Updates. X X X X Staff None 4.4 Organize General Manager's Townhall Tuchmani Meetings(all staff). X X X X Staff Nonb 4.5 Maximize Bulletin Board usage. X Sands None 4.6 Expand function and responsibilities of Communications Action Team. X Tuchman None 4.7 Conduct mid-year(July)internal Tuchmanl communications mini audit. X CATIStaff None 4.8 Conduct comprehensive Internal Tuchmanl Communications Audit in January'97. X Staff None 4.9 Continue special-edition newsletters. Tuchmanl X Graphic Svcs None 1:\wpdockeommseclgoals\wo*plan.sam Page 3 of 9 `�itest+�n�s Goal On- lst Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 4.10 Evaluate and improve NEWSLine effectiveness. X McNally None 4.11 Determine feasibility and possible Implementation of a confidential two-way Tuchman/ communications program. % McNally None 4.12 Coordinate special events(Secretaries Day, Tuchman/ Daughters Day, Son's Day, Family Day). X X X X Staff None 4.13 Work with IERP Committee to develop and Tuchmanl rollout program(Safety). StaffIIERP None 4.14 Develop"display of the month'. Graphic Svcs/ X Staff None 4.15 Work with Human Resources to produce Tuchmanl None employee handbook. X Graphic Svcs C` �i � A"- 5.1 '. � ,,tr4 °� 3 '�" J3, ? ,a I )ro �11' .e3nto ,.w� w Determine theme,design, budget, Tuchmanl production schedule. X Graphic Svcs None 5.2 Determine feasibility of outsourcing writing. X Tuchman None 5.3 Design and layout. Tuchmanl X Graphic Svcs None 5.4 Distribution. X Tuchman None asm Page 4 of 9 If c:� cF t _ r t - r_ t F c_. t ._ �._ r._ t-' r_.. r- f i - Goal On- tst Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr Min Qtr going Responsible Board .� lr� " 4 £k _. ... t 6.1 Coordinate in-house writing. Tuchmanl X Wheatley None 6.2 Design, layout and production. X Graphic Svcs None 6.6 Distribution. Tuchman/ X Wheatley None t 1IY1rklHiHil4lTtt}td` ttdle "�'A a � � ytix� 1" 7.1 Continue to assist in production of Tuchmanf presentation to committees, Board. X Graphic Svcs None 7.2 Continue to provide presentation- consultation services to staff. X Tuchman None 7.3 Coordinate production of quarterly Board X % X X Tuchman None workshop presentations and related materials. I:qrpdocxeommseclgoala\wwkplen.sam Page 5 of 9 M'flesto►IeS , Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going I Responsible Board 8. Support Comprehensive Community Outreach ' Efforts by Implementing a Speaker's Bureau. , ' 8.1 Determine potential audiences and define multi-lingual component. X McNelly None 8.2 Create computerized data base. X McNally None 8.3 Conduct Speakers Bureau training. X McNally None 8A Develop, Implement marketing program. X McNally None 8.6 Develop feedback mechanism(survey)to assess effectiveness, quality of presentations. X 1t McNally Nona JP _>nxg Pali, � yr r �( !Fk gg y p� . jr, V ? - Pn 3. itEu NI' �`•0 1 n $. e r 9.1 Conduct quarterly special-Interest seminars, % X X X Tuchman None workshops and other programs for city managers. 9.2 Develop regularly published newsletters and X X X X Tuchman) None brochures for city officials, state legislators. Graphic Svcs. vim Pdocleemmre ftO& boikplen.eem Page 8 of 9 C' C `. C U-7 It [ [ C [_ r [ —. [ I [ t of r" C '. [- Goal Qn- .py£ gk y 7st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 41th Qtr ygoing Responsible Board pi EiPadsW �n t rN n8ilip r m ? 'nP 10.1 Work with Source Control to develop wide X Tuchmanl None range of"business-friendly"publications. Graphic Svcs. 10.2 Help coordinate on-site seminars, X Tuchman None workshops and other programs for business community. or "11 WIN Ir f r• 11.1 Conduct ongoing treatment plant tours. X McNally None 11.2 Implement comprehensive education X McNally None programs for colleges and universities. s lop$Ilde Literary ' yE - E �3�1£r... t�i``�' r.T •�r:<, i 12.1 Determine type of filing system. X Graphic SvcsJ None Dept. Floater 12.2 Purchase necessary equipment software. X Graphic Svcs. None 12.3 Perform cataloging. X X Dept, Floater None 12.4 Develop check-in/check-out system. X Dept. Floater None I:\wpdockummmc\goals\wadeplan.sam Page 7 of 9 Goal On- list Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr Ah Qtr going Responsible Board 13.1 Establish training program. % Tuchman/ None Graphic SvcsJ Office Aides 13.2 Establish policies and procedures for use. X Graphic Svcs.l None Otflce Aides 13.3 Develop division-use tracking codes. X Office Aides None W JJ �y t . :1 aw 14A Conduct survey to determine customer X Graphic Svcs. None needs. 14.2 Implement recommended programs. X Graphic Svcs. None a � BhP .P deli Roo F mii0 s Ming Efdr 1t 15.1 Implement Norco Delivery Service. X Tuchman/ Smith None 15.2 Purchase folding machine. % Tuchman 15.3 Implement policies and procedures for folding machine. X Office Aides None l:\wpr m%wmmsec%gosls\warkplan.sem Page 8 of 9 Goal On- 1st Qh 2nd Qh 3rd Qtr MIN Qtr going Responsible Board 15.4 Conduct Photocopying Customer- X Office Aides None Satisfaction Survey. 15.5 Implement survey recommendations. X Office Aides None 15.6 Conduct Photocopying customer workshop. X Office Aides None ).\wpdoekommsecgoolslwo*plan.mm Page 9 of 9 l i t t fl 9 G 9 i E Q [ t fi t i 6 i 9 Human Resources Division FY '96 - '97 WORK PLAN y e _ � Goal Qn- 7st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board y J 5�° y y 3t d I £�� mC.£r ^�� E �E i �y d �f" . �I�9n . 1.1 Form an Employee Recognition Committee X Bucher No to develop recommendations to revise and rename the Pride Program. 1.2 Implement new Employee Recognition X Peterman, No Program. Bucher 1.3 Meet with employee service award X Bucher No companies to develop a catalogue program. 1.4 Implement new employee service award X Peterman, No program. Bucher 1.5 Work with Safety and Training to evaluate % Bucher No plans for wellness day/program. 1.6 Plan and schedule wellness day/program. X Josway, Bucher No F:eHOMEWETERMAN\CSOOCUIRMGMTNRKPLN97 Page 1 of 9 Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board Wei a 'gs = d MW n. s 2.1 Reevaluate space and configuration of X Pete man No employees. 2.2 Obtain monthly updates on building X Peterman No progress. 2.3 Ensure building is free of hazards including X Peterman, No asbestos and PCBs prior to move in. Josway 2.4 Ensure adequate furniture and cubicle X Peterman No acquisition. F:MOLWPETERMANICSDOC9IRMG"WRKPLN97 Page 2 of 9 t t I t t t . IVlfia�tvi►a-� Goal °n 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th QU going Responsible Board 3.1 Provide supervisorial training on X Peterman, No performance evaluation to all Districts' Elsman,Sr.HR management. Analyst 3.2 Increase the HR survey ratings of the X Peterman, No performance appraisal and reward category McKinley,Sr. by 55%from 1.61 to 2.5. HR Analyst 3.3 Ensure the integrity of the performance X Peterman,Sr. Yes management system with 50%to 70% of HR Analyst employees receiving"meets expectations." 3 4 Hold supervisors and management X X X X Peterman,Sr. No accountable for getting their employees' HR Analyst reviews in on time. Recommend a"Needs Improvement"in supervisor's review if they fail to accomplish the task. 3.5 Assist supervisors in setting up tangible X Peterman,Sr. No expectations for employees with measurable HR Analyst objectives. F WOMEWE7ERMAN\CSDOCIHRMOMTWRKPLN97 Page 3 of 9 Milestones On- Goal 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 13rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 4. Update and distribute HR survey and - communicate results. Tasks i 4.1 Revise last year's HR survey with the help of X Peterman,Sr. No Mathews and 7uchman. HR Analyst 4.2 Distribute a random survey to one-third of % Peterman,Sr. No the Districts employees. HR Analyst 4.3 Compile, post, and distribute the results to X Peterman,Sr. No all employees with analysis within three HR Analyst weeks of the deadline. R. Pape 4 of g fl 1 fl 1 1 1 t fl 1 l l 1 1 1 fl fl t 1 1 5plu Goal °n tst Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board is 3 d. . .- ".> i�'9.3 c lard lmpleRfbKt t(re iseommendattons j� broadbanding consultatrt ..� a ._._ -, . 5.1 Write a RFQ including background and X Peterman, No scope of work for the broadbanding McKinley,Sr. consultant. FIR Analyst 5.2 Work with the broadbanding consultant to K Peterman, No gather information, run reports,and answer McKinley,Sr. questions to facilitate the process. HR Analyst 5.3 Present the findings and/or X Peterman, Yes recommendations of the Broadbanding McKinley consultant to the FAHR Committee. 5.4 Meet and confer with the unions on % Peterman, No Broadbanding recommendations including McKinley skill based pay agreement 5.5 Return to the Board with the negotiated X Peterman, Yes classification, pay and performance system. McKinley ',6, Develop new employee relations program. � - TAM s.s „' 6.1 Develop an onsite confidential counseling X Peterman, No area for employees and communicate its Bucher availability. 6.2 Develop protocol for employees and X Peterman, No supervisors to address policy and Bucher disciplinary action on an Informal basis. F:WOMEIPETERM N%CSDOCWRMGMnWRKPLN97 Page 5of9 F; Goal Qn- lst Qtr 2nd Qtr I 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board I F t aE 7.1 Develop and communicate procedures for X Peterman,Laird No employees to resolve disputes/questions with their claims. 7.2 Develop and distribute the annual employee X Petennan, Laird No benefit statements using new FIS system. 7.3 Work with Tuchman to develop quarterly X Pelerman, Laird No brown bag lunches to explain effective utilization of Districts' benefits. 7.4 Automate and consolidate benefits X Peterman, Laird No administration within HR including all insurances with the exception of Workers Comp. 7.5 Review and conduct cost analysis on X Peterrnan, Laird No Districts' benefits to determine market value and renegotiate with carriers if needed. F:�OMEtPETERMAMCSDOCWRMGMnWRKPLN97 P"e8of9 E [ t __- C [__ t t " C [ t C t__ L C- C C C C__ �_ t t a t t t a a a a a a t a a t a t a Goal On- list Otr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr Ah Qtr going Responsible Board k 8.1 Consolidate all Distdcls' MOUs Into one X Peterman No binder including Employee Relations Practices memos. 8.2 Develop"Frequently Asked Questions" x Peterman No (FAQs)list to include in consolidated Policy and Procedures manual. 8.3 After negotiations, Include all policies, X Peterman No practice memos, and FAA's in one three ring binder to facilitate the update process. 8.4 Continue to update and revise policies and X Peterman Yes procedures to confomr with regulation and evolving workplace issues. 8.5 Continue to hold quarterly training sessions X Peterman No for all supervisory and management personnel to update policies and practices. 8.6 Update employee handbook to reflect new X Peterman, No MOUs and policies Bucher F:VIOMEWETERMAN\CSDOCWRMGMTWRKPLN97 Page 7 of 9 Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 9.1 Work with FIS vendor on data transfer and X PeWnnan,Laird, No screen programming. Steeves 9.2 Revise HR system reports. X Pelerman, No Sleeves, HR Ana"t 9.3 Inventory employee skills and initiate in- X Peterrnan, No sourcing program. Steeves, HR Analyst 9.4 Develop input, reporting and conversion x Peterrnan, No procedures as necessary. Steeves,HR Analyst F:VIOMETETERMAN\CSDOCVIRMGMTWRKPLN97 PpaS019 [ C [ [ L _ C r C C C C C r- C_ r _ IF C t [ , Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board WIWE �.E_.,,.�a.2.2 . ££ 10.1 Maintain cost per hire numbers under 1,500 X Peterman, No for NE and 3,500 for EX. Steeves 10.2 Fill external recruitments in under 51 days X Peterman, No for EX and 36 days for NE. Steeves 10.3 Conduct a cost/benefit analysis of Summer X Peterman, No Intern Program and administer the program Steeves within the NE time to fill standards. 10.4 Maintain the minimum qualifications X Peterman, No requirements for all positions and question Sleeves changes. ,301 11. Complete latlor aepoilaHona to lmplemerltr grgiwnlxattcrnal goals.! ' a �a 3 r' 11.1 Hire labor negotiator through RFQ process. X Peterman No 11.2 Develop proposal list for negotiator. X Peterman No 11.3 Complete reports and background X X X Peterman No information to provide support to negotiator. 11.4 Sit in on meet and confer process. X X Peterman No 11.5 Obtain Board approval of MOUs. X X Peterman Yes F:e10ME1PETERMANICSDOCV RMGMT MKPLN91 Page 9 of 9 Safety and Emergency Response Division FY '96 - '97 WORK PLAN Goal Qn- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr I going Responsible Board o e F _•° s M�4' , 1.1 IERP Volume I:Emergency Preparedness X Joswayl No Tunnlcllff 1.2 IERP Volume If:Emergency Plans and X Joswayl No Procedures Tunnicliff 1.3 Complete Training Plan X Tunnicliff No 1.4 Initiate Employee Training X X Tunnicliff No 1.5 Initiate Exercises and Drills X X Tunnlcfiff No 1.6 Conduct Full Scale Exercises with Local X X Tunnicliff No Emergency Response Agencies g,wmp hrl afetyjnmyl dmin\9omWn Page 1 of 7 1Vlfl@SiAties: Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr I going Responsible Board OIIIZOri��. �, 2.1 Prepare staff report with recommendations to X Josway No award a contract to Clayton Environmental 2.2 Make presentation and obtain approval of X Josway Yes project at the July OMTS Committee meeting 2.2 Obtain Board approval to proceed with X Josway Yes project 2.3 Award contract X Josway No 2.4 Develop project schedule X Josway No 2.5 Monitor progress X X X X % Josway No 2.6 Inform employees of monitoring results X X % X X Josway No 2.7 Place monitoring results in employee X X X X X Tumbaugh No medical file 2.8 Identify future projects for FY 1997-98 % Josway No Budget a:Wplh vefety9nsmyvid.ln kPIe Pape 2 of 7 IF IF IF IF r t I IF t t [ - r IF t- IF. r :. r- 7 V- Goal On- 7st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board :, qi.. 4� (u.�< ,fl .. .vu .4�3•. E�'. 1�5 +2b4fi`Se 3� ..o�n __e Si$`Y ..� � v . 3.1 Develop Scope of Work for Needs x Joswayl No Assessment Tunnicliff 3.2 Identify 4 qualified consulting firms X Josway No 3.3 Send out RFP x Josway No 3.4 Review and evaluate proposals x Joswayl No Tunnicliff 3.5 Prepare staff report for General Manager's x Josway No review 3.6 Obtain General Manager approval to x Josway No proceed with project 3.7 Award project x Josway No 3.8 Monitor project milestones x x x Josway No 3.9 Consultant completes recommendation x Josway No report 3.10 Develop strategic plan for development of x Joswayl No procedures G.Jones g:wr,vvvwreMoswa&dminwwftln Page 3 of 7 Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 4.1 Purchase Software and Install on Networks X Tunnicliff No 42 Develop User Manual X Tunnicl'df/ No Heald 4.3 Data entry of MSDS's X X Tunnicliff/ No Heald 4.4 Initiate employee training X X Tunnicltff/ No Heald g:Mq\h6safelyy.y\admh%96Yrtlp1n Pqp 4 of C t C C . C C t C C C C C- U— t_— C-_ U.__. t__ L- C_ u t t a t a a t a a a e t t a t Goal On- 1st Qtr I 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board Yt x i x s. ; -, {tfS .z5ama - t �5 " f'� fit' a 5.1 Schedule meetings with the General X Josway No Manager,Assistant GM"S,Department Heads, and Division Managers 5.2 Identify desired Information and report X Josway No frequency 5.3 Generate reports X X X X Joswayl No Tumbaugh 5.4 Schedule meetings to ensure reports meet X Josway No needs g:W,I,W aWlYjaswaymdmin�l In Page 5 of 7 11PIP Azz, Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board { � L e . . K_ z. aA «c rdaadxf€°� :?r », ' F?f. Rf;d . r £ �N rrpd 6.1 Establish a Safety Policy Review Committee X Josway No 6.2 Conduct monthly committee meetings X X X X X Josway No 6.3 Develop a committee work plan X Josway No 6.4 Monitor work plan milestones X X X X X Josway No 6.5 Present recommendations to GM and X X X X % Josway No AGM's aMvpIht a felylo yadminl95wft n Pao!6 of I IF t E - [ e - IF t r le-- e-- t-- r_ r-- E7 u-- r-- u-- 17 U-- t 1 1 I t l 1 t 1 l l l 1 1 l t ( 1 l nsaa utix. ..... 8..... Goal Qn- 7st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 411h Qtr going Responsible Board A rIr I'L' rn:` 1 �. Ra .� MINOR� 7.1 Define OSHA training requirements X EismanlJosway No /Mitchell 7.2 Identify training requirements for each X EismanlJosway No position classification /Mitchell 7.3 Develop training matrix for all departments X EismanlJosway No /Mitchell 7.4 Implement Phase 1 immediate needs training X EismanlJosway No program /Mitchell 7.5 Evaluate training programs X X X X X EismanlJosway No [Mitchell 7.6 Update and revise training programs as X EismanlJosway No necessary /Mitchell g:WprhdsatetAoswayradm1n\96wrkp1n Page 7 of 7 t 8 C t d Q C 0 @ S t B 9 C fl C 0 t 0 EDUCATION AND TRAINING DIVISION FY '96 - '97 WORK PLAN Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board S' �X 1.1 Define OSHA Training Requirements % EISMAWJOSWAYI None MITCHELL 1.2 Identify training requirements for each X EISMANIJOSWAYI None position classification MITCHELL 1.3 Develop Training Matra for All Departments X EISMANIJOSWAYI None MITCHELL 1.4 Implement Phase I Immediate Needs Program X EISMANMOSWAY None MITCHELL 1.5 Evaluate Training Programs X % X X X EISMANIJOSWAYI None MITCHELL 1.6 Update and revise training programs as necessary X EISMAWJOSWAYI None MITCHELL A1WORKPI AN.530 Page 1 of 8 Goal On- 7st Qtr 2nd Qtr 5rd Qtr I 4th Qtr going Responsible I Board i 2.1 Provide Training to All Personnel on IDP Process X EISMAN/MITCHELL None 2.2 Publish Individual Development Plan Handbook for X MITCHELL None All Employees 2.3 Implement Individual Development Plans % MITCHELLOSMAN None 2.4 Monitor Progress of Individual Development Plans % MITCHELUEISMAN None 2.5 Provide Quarterly Reports to Managers on IDP % MITCHELUEISMAN None Progress A1NORKIP AN.s7o Papa 2 ore r - r-_ r- U-_ U U- c c E c r- t a a a a a a a a t a a a a a a t a a Goal On- tat Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board e �� "k '`x=a � ' a yet•}zeY•" ��2�iml✓-, � 3tl533.3�� 5a:. 3.1 Implement FY 97 Training Plan X EISMAN None 3.2 Meet with Departments Quarterly to Analyze X EISMAN None Training Requirements 3.3 Develop FY 98 DishicFwide Training Plan % EISMAN None 3.4 Review District-wide Training Plans % EISMAN None 3.5 Finalize FY 98 District-wide Training Plan x EISMAN None A:\WORKPtAN.SM Page 3 of 8 On-Goal 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board Impl'�i;: _a reeks I I _. i. ��'pw�5, mloya. rt�e. � sE 4.1 Complete Identricaton of tasks(phase 1) x FLANAGAN None 4.2 Identify personnel to be trained(phase 1) X FLANAGAN None 4.3 Develop Training Materials(phase l) % FLANAOAMMITCHELL None 4A Implement Training X FLANAGAMMITCHELV None EISMAN 4.5 Evaluate&Revise Training(phase I) % FLANAGAMMITCHELLI None EISMAN 4.6 Identify Training Tasks(phase 11) % FUNAGAMMITCHELLI None EISMAN 4.7 Submit Written Plan for Phase II X EISMAN None AIWORKPLAN.53a Page 4 of 8 t t C -- C t t i [ t If i C C."` U_ i_.. U_. L_ C- t t Q t Q Q G t fl 1 t 9 t B fl t t t ' m, Goal ° 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible TBoarld 5.1 Publish Training Calendar FT 97 X MITCHEW Nona MARTINEZ 52 Revise&Update Calendar X MRCHELLI None MARTINEZ A\WORKPLAN.SW Page 5 o1 8 Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board S s %qr •' 3.�:"". - i..:: ..a.: �', 1. 6.1 Purchase&install system X MrrCHELUEISMAN None 6.2 Train Selected Staff X MITCHELUEISMAN None 6.3 Standardize Districts Training Request System % EISMAN None 6.4 Download Training&Personnel Data % MITCHELL None 6.5 Implement System % EISMAN None 6.6 Generate Departmental Reports % MITCHELUEISMAN None 6.7 Evaluate System&Revise as Needed x MITCHELUEISMAN None A:WORIwuN.mo Page 6 of 6 r - r- . 1--. r_ r- r- c- r- c- t - r Milestones Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 7, mlprtoem Ttnbbrg CCsl Syslrm/o TMA 6 laonitar Costs by Depar &TralnfnR"cotory Lam 7.1 Implement System % EISMANIMITCHELL None 72 Generate Quarterly Departmental Reports & EISMANIMITCHELL None 7.3 Evaluate System&Revise as Needed X EISMANIMITCHELL None AIWORKPLAN.S3a Page 7 of 8 Mfles[csnes Goal Q" 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board b OsvCblmpNaie tt 1ebi14 GPa9ram for e e r 8.1 Identify Retraining Requirements X EISMANIMITCHELU None FLANAGAN 0.2 Identity Personnel to be Trained % EISMANIMITCHELU None FLANAGAN 8.3 Develop Training Program % EISMANIMrrCHELU None FLANAGAN 84 Implement Training X EISMANIMITCHELU None FLANAGAN 8.5 Evaluate 8 Revise Training % EISMANIMITCHELU None FLANAGAN AMORIPLANSM e r c r r r [ _ r _ r _ t— r- V_ t Q a a u k t a e a u n l Q f 1 e FINANCE ADMIN FY '96 - '97 WORK PLAN Goal On- 1 at Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 41th Qtr going Responsible Board 1.1 Select overall best software and hardware X Selection Team Yes FIS solution and complete negotiations with KCGNWhhe/GGS vendor 1.2 Develop comprehensive Implementation X GGS/ None schedule and milestones Whit"CO 1.3 Complete module Installations In accordance X X K X StmedNWhfte None with the schedule,Payroll by 1/197 a • 2.1 Transfer knowledge of current calculation K Streed None methods to staff and consultants 2.2 Develop financial information as needed X Streed/Esber None 2.3 Participate in planning and workshops X X Stmed/Esber None I:W4xIw`cwnmwWm1sWmr pkn,wm Page 1 of 5 Milestones Goal On- 1st QIT 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 3. Complete the revitalization of the Risk Management Task Force as a cross- departmental team ,! 1 As" 3.1 Revise draft Risk Management Manual x Kozak None 3.2 Advise staff of Manual and uses x Kozak None 3.3 Evaluate Insurance practices and changes x Kozak None 3.4 Recommend work practices 6 policies to x Kozak None reduce Oak 3.5 Make regular reports to FAHR Committee x Kozak Info only 4. Improve staf's abilities to monitor budgetary performance by holding training sessions and > divisional ono-on-one sessions as needed 4.1 Develop training program on budget and x White/Cagle None actual expense report review methods 4.2 Schedule and hold training sessions x White/Cagle None 4.3 Schedule and hold divisional one-on-ones x CagglelStaH None I:Mpdoc`cammeacgrh\ral�lan.wm Page 2 of 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ( 1 I I I 1 1 I I M: .r Goal °n 1 at Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board s 5.1 Finalize which seMcos ere needed X KoraklWhite Nona 52 Develop an RFP X Kozak None 5.3 Review RFP with FAHR Committee X Kozak Approve 5.4 Review responses and recommend bank X Kozak Approve S tk q W 6.1 Review Strategic Plan and needs X StmedlKozak None 6.2 Prepare staff strategy and selection X Kozak recommendation&RFPs 6.3 Conduct RFP selection process X Kozak 6.4 Recommend financing team to FAHR X Kozak twpa�'�mmeecVoe�s'evaatlnn.rem Page 3 of 5 MAO Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board S Lek� e e :fnonkarin 7.1 Conduct needs analysis and develop a X StreedlDubolsl None training program Mathews 7.2 Schedule and conduct classes X StreedlDubolsl None Mathews 7.3 Review contract performance,scope X Dubols None changes and contract changes with managers n`�ka 8.1 Develop an RFP x Kozak None 8.2 Conduct RFP and evaluation process x Kozak None 8.3 Recommend broker-of-record to FAHR x Kozak Approve �,yrpexlcommeec�amMMal�lenrem pqp 4 ots 1 MilestoneLLJ Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 9. EamGFOA awards for 1996.97 budget and 1996-96CAFR and MTA award for investment policy 9.1 Submit 1996-97 Budget X White None 9.2 Submit 1995-96 CAFR X White None 9.3 Submit Investment Policy % Kozak None 9.4 Acceptawards X X White/Kozak Accept I Page 5 of 5 fl 1 ACCOUNTING - FY '96=97 WORK PLAN I!, On- Goal 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board i .P 1� a ! , sd •aNO, CompletionorConrae�Negotitatlohd for a he f t(� ; ,, None onsysiam '�` „+ a : k +' �f �j�"l tt''N ..1, . 1.1 select a financial Information system vendor X White Yes and complete a negotitated contract. 2 •MtpMinshtatlon o1 q�f�xi t nanc "HatM mw- 2.1 �rrlA tfR`�J h� '�. Complete a Comprehensive implementation X White No Plan with the assistance of the selected computer vendor and the Districts'F.I.S. computer consultant, Kerry Consulting Group. 2.2 Complete the installation of the new payroll X White/Gaggle/ No module so that payroll can be processed on - JlmenerlAguilar the new system by the beginning of calendar year 1997. 2.3 Complete the implementation of the X X X X White/All No remaining financial information system Accounting modules. Staff C:lwpda1mm*pran.dw Page 1 of 4 Goal on- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr go7ng Responsible 8aard � 1• I 3 ai Develop s Distriet-wide budget mongodng'.�r!;.� �^ +' + b{3?t;yTtP � , .�icl'q,`yK} tk�y ,5", 7ct , :.: A IQ Program THskg. r: ' r► T,9 3.1 Develop budget monitoring procedures. X WhitelCagle No 3.2 Conduct a budget monitoring training X White/Cagle No session with all budget coordinators. 3.3 Oversee budget monitoring through quarterly X X X X X White/Cagle No financial reports and provide feedback to buget coordinators 4. Complete the Develop of a Districts Wide �.: Comprehensive policy and procedure manual,! i covering aft finance and accounting issues In .coordination with the Implementation of the ', " r� now financial information system.' ' i 12`'�� $I ,r '" y l` hs'T'12 ; 1 4A Complete the Identification and compitiation X White/All No of ail current finance and accounting policies Accounting and procedures. Staff 4.2 Develop a new chart of accounts in X WhiteMillonl No coordination with the implementation of the Cagle new financial information system. 4.3 Identify processing changes resulting from X White/All No the implementation of the new financial Accounting Information system. Stall 4.4 Develop the formal and contents of the X White/Dillon/ No accounting policies and procedures manual. Cagle c1wpdatalworkp1an.mdw Paige 2 of4 Goal °n 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 4.5 Prepare and edit a final drag document. X WhItelDlllonl No Cagle 4.6 Submit the final draft document to X White/Dillon/ No Adminstration for approval. Cagle W01.monthly sceoungi g,to support budget andpbfoimalibi+:I m�siwuremen)l(BPorl�n8i` , `; t lj ° "`.y�. 53, ful �j!I •"^Ifj�.l. ,Il i(I t rulx 1�� +3�15:`''e� lh��tir, + thS . ,r�`'�' Il � f5.1 Develop a formal,written accounting closing X White/Dillon No schedule that will allow for the distribution of the prior month budget-lo-actual financial reports within 10 working days of the current month(five working days following the Installation of the new financial Information sytem). 5.2 Monitor the closing process on an active X X White/Dillon No basis and identify those aclivites that delay the accounting close,and improve the timeliness of those critical path activities to faclltale earlier closure. 8, Increase the level of Division-wide.training,,! � � F' 6.1 Provide for eddillonal cross4mining of X X % X WhkeiDlllonl No accounting clerks,and supervisors,where Esber applicable. cMxpdataWmrkplrn.mdw Page 3 of 4 At MIl dYess Goal on. ist Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 6.2 Identify external training programs that will X X X X White/Dillon/ No broaden the skills of the Accounting staff and Cagle assist in the ability to cross-train employees. 6.3 Implement a mentoring program whereby X White/Cagle No Accounting Division supervisors cross over functional lines in assisting other staff members in the areas of fund accounting, workpaper techniques, and in the development of analytical skills. � ^ft POOp4 Ot4 PURCHASING &WAREHOUSE DIVISION) FY'96-97 WORK PLAN Goal on- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board a H .T.r��lu,6d.F � Eye 4k I E fEi M.s'� 1�..:� 5 1.1 Accumulate historical data for ABC X 6 M.Dubois None categorization 1.2 Establish cycle count calendar X M.Dubois None B.Taylor 1.3 Train Staff on ABC Cycle Program X B.Taylor None 1.4 Implement actual cycle counts X B.Taylor None i Wrydmc omrn a lgwislworkplan.sam Page 1 0(5 f Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 2, Increase Supplier Performance by Reducingr Discrepancy Reconciliation and Expediting Activity by 50l0 � !> r is� a, U ay asks � 'kcxP 2.1 Standardize a supplier`Hot Sheet"identifying X M.Dubois None chronic delivery/discrepancy problem W.Thorali suppliers 2.2 Conduct quarterly audit of suppliers to hack X K.Yarosh None trends of performance and develop file on J.Corfman problem vendors A.M.Feery W.Thorall 2.3 Review with appropriate departments X X X K.Yarosh None problem (non-performing)sole source J.Codman suppliers and document findings/proposed A.M.Feery solutions 2.4 Continually cultivate new,high performing X K.Yarosh None suppliers and drop non-performing ones. J.Corfman Document on-going successes of efficiency A.M.Feery kyapdW) o Mec9aalsrvmkPlan.MM Pays2of5 Ic z- r i I: T r 1 A ! t A E t Q f 1 t fl C t t 6 6 d A t Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board M", p 3ag sax ( is c� IEtOtii Eiv I >> " t.° tql � 03 � _ sg •t;¢ � � < < �r�� jai ��3�y 4 3.1 Identify obsoletelsurplus Inventory for X M.Dubois None disposition B.Taylor 3.2 Deslgnate method of disposition as most X M.Dubois None profitable 3.3 Establish staging area for surplus to X B.Taylor None segregate from active Inventory 3.4 Dispose surplus accordingly X M.Dubois None B.Taylor I:W.pd.c mmse V.1sWurl¢lan.sam Page 3 of 5 Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 4. Ensure purchasing Menitors Contract E ��, %�' � � � 1A;1� � � a h �€% Compliance and Negotiations on 7b°/ oP a,��➢w rA>e'P�� t '� �� DlStricts'Pormalfln}ermal Agreements "��a } I' �' � �'' r�`�i� 4.1 Develop standardized formats for bids and X M.Dubois None contract agreements for construction, L.Heller professional services, major purchases,etc. (terms and condifions,specifications, Insurance requirements,etc.) 4.2 Formalize contract administration procedures X M.Dubois None to minimize duplication of review and stream line process 4.3 Provide District-wide training on contract X M.Dubois None administration 4.4 Develop Improved filing system to X K.Blanda None accommodate wdsting procurement documents and forthcoming bids and contracts originating from contract administration responsibilities kMydxvxmms¢clapislwodytan.sem Ppe 4 of s Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Mr 3rd Qtr Ah Mr going Responsible Board f� 5.1 Work with Accounts Payable to establish X M.Dubois None mechanism to procure off master agreements 5.2 Identify inventoried hems eligible for blanket X K.Yarosh None order agreements J.Corfman A.M.Feery 5.3 Determine annual usages X K.Yarosh None J.Corfman A.M.Feery 5.4 Develop appropriate specifications for bid X K.Yarosh None J. Corfman A.M.Feery 5.5 Develop price analysis on vehicles,capital X K.Yarosh None equipment, etc.,to compare cooperative contracts v.s.competitive formal bid process v.s. hand to mouth buying; used v.s.new; availability;quality G:\W PIPURCHUIELLER\DUBOIa\W PLN9697 I:Vpdw\�ms VoalsWotWm.mm Page 5 of 5 i General Services Administration FY '96 - '97 WORK PLAN Milestones Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going I Responsible Board 1. Ensure that the Districts are competitive by improving productivity through proactive manpower planning and the application of technology. Tasks: 1.1 Develop Marketing Strategies for two X Hodges/Arhontes/ No facilities management services. Collins 1.2 Complete feasibility study for X Hodges/Arhontes/ Yes marketing collections services to Collins other local jurisdictions. 1.3 Complete feasibility study for X Hodges/Arhontes/ Yes purchasing land, applying OCSD Collins biosolids, growing a cash crop and marketing the crop. 1.4 Working with the Plant Automation X Hodges/Severn Yes Team, complete J-31 project, implement automation for"C" Headworks. 1.5 Implement recommendations of X Hodges/Hovey No Information Technology Management Audit. R:IWPO000310�EH\BUDGET96\WORKPLAM9&97.WP Page 1 of 5 Milestones Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 1.6 Develop a staffing plan for FY 97/98 X Hodges/Arhontes/ No focusing on no staff increases and Huey utilizing more outsourcing. 2. Maintain collection system regulatory compliance within our areas of responsibility, commensurate with the funding and resources provided. sks: 2.1 Participate on Sanitary Sewer X Hodges/Arhontes No Overflow minimization strategies and resource needs. 2.2 Assist Communications Division on X HodgesrTuchman/ No issues related to Collections System Arhontes O&M. 3. Assist in the development of a strategic plan which meets the future needs of our service area. Tasks 3.1 Work with Engineering and their X Hodges No consultants to develop overall QA/QC procedures 3.2 Develop a cross departmental "user X HodgeslArhontes/ No group" made up of representives ooten from Operations, Maintenance and Collections personnel for input and review of strategic plan. R:\WPDOCZ310\EH\BUDGET96\WORKPLAN\96-97.WP Page 2 of 5 I I i i 1 f I 1 I I Milestones Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 4. Assist in the development of compliant and cost-effective safety systems, policies and procedures to protect our employees and the environment. Tasks 4.1 Participate in the development of the X X Hodges/Hovey Yes Integrated Emergency Response /Arhontes Plan. 4.2 Working with the Safety Division, X X X X Hodges/Hovey No develop a Safety Strategic plan lArhontes/Josway 4.2.1 Meet and develop plan X Hodges No 4.2.2 Begin implementation X 4.2.3 Prepare Safety Budget for X FY 97/98 5. Assist the agency and its . communications programs by providing information and support in order to build stronger working relationships within our watershed. Task 5.1 Provide input on GSA responsibilities X HodgeslHovey/ No and capabilities. Arhontes 5.2 Work with Communications Division X Hodges/Arhontes/ No to develop a customer comment Hoveyrruehman form for the Information Technology and Collection System O&M Divisions. R:\WPDOCQ310%EH1BUDGET96\WORKPLANl96.97.WP Page 3 of 5 Milestones Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 5.3 Meet and discuss common issues X Hodges/Arhontes/ No and develop stronger dialogue with Hovey all internal and external customers. 6. Provide employee support and training opportunities to ensure that we have a trained and flexible work force. Task 6.1 Identify crosstraining opportunities X Hodges/Hovey/ No and needs within GSA. Arhontes 6.2 Identify insourcing capabilities of X Hodges/Hovey/ No GSA staff for short term use by other Arhontes divisions. 6.3 Mentor GSA staff on the agency's x Hodges No cultural and organizational changes. 6.4 Monitor staff performance on utilizing x Hodges/Hovey/ No training and educational programs. Arhontes 7. Support improvements in management performance thru the adoption of improved cost accountability and utilizing performance measurement and benchmarking as tools to enhance productivity. Tasks 7.1 Participate in monitoring and X X X X Hodges No reporting of workplan performance. R:\WPO0C�3310\EHSUDGET96\W0RKPLANl6-97.WP Page 4 of 5 I 1 1 t 1 1 I 1 1 l 1 1 i 1 1 1 t Milestones Goal Qn- tst Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 7.2 Monitor and report on X X X X Hodges/Hovey/ No implementation of HR performance Arhontes review and individual development programs for GSA staff. 7.3 Monitor monthly budget compliance X X X X Hodges/Hovey/ No with staff. Arhontes 7.4 Assist with phase in of new FIS, X Hodges/Hovey/ No LIMS and identi training needs for castmon staff as well as C MS development issues. 7.5 Monitor compliance with FY 96/97 X X X X Hodges/Hovey/ No performance objectives. Arhontes 7.6 Support GSA staff with X X X X Hedges No benchmarking development. 7.7 Determine detailed modifications X Hodges/Castigon No needed for CMMS as a result of GSA formation. 7.8 Implement a capital funds X Hodges No reimbursement program for non- maintenance related tasks. 7.9 Participate in FY 97/98 budget X X Hodges/Hoveyl Yes preparation and workplan Arhontes development process. R:\WPDOC\3310XEHSUDGET96\WORKPLANM.97.WP Page 5 of 5 Hardware Support FY '96 - '97 WORK PLAN Milestones Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 1. Replace Security Card Access System Tasks: 1.1 Determine Scope of Work. X Lembke/Gala No 1.2 Work with Engineering to prepare RFD X LembkelGaia Yes & Send to Consultants. 1.3 Review Consultants Quotations, Select X Lembke/Gala Yes Consultant, get Board authority. 1.4 Consultant Prepares Plans& Specs. X LembkelGaia No 1.5 Job Bid, Approved by Committees& Board. X LembkelGaia Yes 1.6 Card Access System Replaced. X Lembke/Gala No 1.7 Train Employees on New System. X Lembke/Gala No 2. Select, Install, & Startup Communications Server. Tasks: 2.1 Determine Scope of Work, Prepare Job X LembkelLloydl No Plan. Gaia/2430 2.2 Research & Evaluate Available Equipment. X LembkelLloydl No Gaia12430 2.3 Select equipment, get Board approval(if X LembkelLloydl Yes necessary), purchase and install equipment. Gala12430 X:\WPD0CSUTSEC.0LD2420196-97WP Page 1 of 4 Milestones Goal on- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 41th Qtr going Responsible Board 2.4 Train Employees on New System. X Lembke/Lloyd/ No Gaia/2430 3. Upgrade Plant 1 PBX System. Tasks 3.1 Determine Scope of Work, Prepare Job X LembkelLloyd Yes Plan. 3.2 Select Equipment. Obtain CMAS Quote. X LembkelLloyd No 3.3 Present Quote to Committees&Board for X LembkelLloyd Yes Approval. 3.4 Order& Install Equipment. X Lembke/Lloyd No 3.5 Train Employees on New Equipment. X LembkelLloyd No 4. Network Hardware Upgrades. Tasks 4.1 Determine Scope of Work, Prepare Job X Lembke/Gaial No Plan. 2430 4.2 Work with Engineering to Prepare RFQ& X LembkelGaial Yes Send to Consultant. 2430 4.3 Work with Consultant on Equipment X LembkelGaial No Needs/Evaluation. 2430 4.4 Consultant Prepares Specs. X LembkelGaial No 2430 4.5 Job Bid, Approved by Committees&Board. X LembkelGaial Yes 2430 X:\WPDOCS\ITSEC.OLD\242006-9TWP Page 2 of 4 Milestones Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 41th Qtr going Responsible Board 4.6 Order&Install Equipment. X Lembke/Gaial No 2430 4.7 Train Employees on New Equipment. X Lembke/Gala/ No 2430 5. IT Voice/Data Cabling Additions (Ongoing). Talk 5.1 Throughout FY: Determine Needs, Prepare X Lembke/Lloyd/ No Job Plans, Order Materials&Contract Labor Gala as Required. 6. Ongoing Division Work Task 6.1 Develop PM plan for computer hardware& X Lembke No peripherals to be used when equipment is opened for other servicing. 6.2 Set-up training with Finance Dept. to X Lembke No educate IT managers and supervisors re: the processes&procedures related to proper fiscal management, accountability and justification. 6.3 Complete work orders within the following X All No time frames: emergency<24 hours, high priority<3 workdays, medium priority<5 work days, routine within 14 days. The ongoing task is to meet the work order targets. X:\WPD0CSUTSECDLD12420196-97WP Page 3 of 4 Milestones Goal Qn- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 6.4 Complete the computer& peripheral X All No inventory to a 95%accuracy rate. Maintain the accuracy of the inventory. 6.5 Increase division staff productive time to X Lembke No 75%. X.XWPDOCSVTSEC.OLDt2420196-97WP Page 4 of 4 Software Support FY '96 - '97 WORK PLAN Milestones Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 1. Complete work orders as per target; emergency<24 hours, high priority<3 work days, medium priority<5 work days and routine priority< 14 work days. as 1.1 Meet work order targets. X E.Tran/Gong No H.Tran/Others 1.2 Increase division staff productive time to X Herrera No 75% 2. Phase in NT throughout EngineeringlAdmin by 9130196. Tasks: 2.1 Client, application and data survey. X HerreralDumity No Nguyenl0thers 2.1 NT client install. X HerreralDumity No Nguyen/Others 2.1 Create NT accounts and data directories. X HerreralDumity No NguyenlOthers 2.1 Rehost applications. X HerreralDumity No Nguyen/Others 2.1 Test migration. X HerreralDumity No Nguyen/Others H:\WP.DTAQSAVT12410\WOODSIDE'2430t96-97.WP Page 1 of 5 Milestones Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 41th Qtr going Responsible Board 2.1 Training. X Eisman No 2.1 Final migration. X HerreralDumity No Nguyen/Others 3. Phase In NT throughout Finance, HR, and Purchasing by 12131196. Tasks: 3.1 Client, application and data survey. X Hertera/Dumity No Nguyen/Others 3.1 NT client install. X Herrera/Dumity No Nguyen/Others 3A Create NT accounts and data directories. X HerreralDumity No Nguyen/Others 3.1 Rehost applications. % HerreralDumity No Nguyen/Others 3.1 Test migration. X HerreralDumity No Nguyen/Others 3.1 Training. X Barren No 3.1 Final migration. X HerreralDumity No Nguyen/Others 4. Phase In NT throughout Technical Services by 3131197. Tasks: 4.1 Client, application and data survey. X HerreralDumity No Nguyen/Others H\WP.DTA\GSAVT\2410\WOODSIDE@430196-97.WP Page 2 of 5 I 1 4 1 4 4 J J I J I 11 4 1 1 Milestones Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 4.1 NIT client install. X Herrera/Dumity No Nguyen/Others 4.1 Create NIT accounts and data directories. X HerreralDumity No Nguyen/Others 4.1 Rehost applications. % HerreralDumity No Nguyen/Others 4.1 Test migration. X HerreralDumity, No Nguyen/Othem 4.1 Training. X Elsman No 4.1 Final migration. X Herrera/Dumity No Nguyen/Others S. Phase in NIT throughout the Lab by 6/30/97. Tasks: 5.1 Client, application and data survey. X Herrera/Dumity No Nguyen/Other: 5.1 NIT client install. X Herrera/Dumity No Nguyen/Others 5.1 Create NT accounts and data directories. % HerreralDumity No NguyenlOthem 5.1 Rehost applications. X Herrera/Dumity No Nguyen/Others 5.1 Test migration. X Herrera/Dumity No NguyenlOthers 5.1 Training. X Eisman No H:\WP.DTA%GSAMM410\WOODSIDE%2430196.97.WP Page 3 of 5 Milestones Goal °n 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 5.1 Final migration X HerreralDumity No Nguyen/Others 6. Meet programming milestones for Source Control Monitoring/Compliance. asks 6.1 Complete multiday SMR forms. X Throop No 6.2 Complete TTO waiver. X Throop No 6.3 Complete notice of violations. X Throop No 6.4 Complete resampling notice of violations. % Throop No 6.5 Complete monthly averaging. X Throop No 6.6 Complete wastehauler calculations. X Throop No 6.7 Complete full constituent conversion. X Throop No 6.8 Convert Smenu utility. X Throop No 6.9 Convert flow graphing. X Throop No 7. Meet programming milestones for Source Control Oracle programming. Task 7A Complete wastehauler permits. X Swindler No 7.2 Complete OAOC reports. X Swindler No 7.3 Upgrade to Oracle 7.2.2.4.3. X Swindler No 7.4 Complete combined wastestream. X Swindler No H:\WP.DTAIGSAUTl241MWOODSIDEV430\W-97.WP Page 4 of 5 1 1 11 1 4 1 t 1 1 4 1l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Milestones Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr I 3rd Qtr I 4th Qtr I going Responsible Board 7.5 Complete wastestream history. X Swindler No 7.6 Install SQL•Net 2.0. x Swindler No 7.7 Implement online redo logs. X Swindler No 7.8 Complete full constituent. X Swindler No H:\WP.DTA\GSA\IT\2410\WOODSIDE\2430\96-97.WP Page 5 of 5 Plant Automation FY '96 - '97 WORK PLAN Milestones Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going I Responsible Board 1. RJN Work Order Tasks 1.1 All high-priority work orders serviced in 5 X Severn/Staff No days or less. 1.2 All medium-priority work orders serviced in X Severn/Staff No 15 days or less. 1.3 All routine work orders serviced in 30 days X Severn/Staff No or less. 1A All self initiated work orders serviced in 21 X Severn/Staff No days or less. 1.5 Backlog of work orders at end of 41h quarter X Severn/Staff No to be less than 5 2. Plant Automation Performance Review Tasks 2.1 Planning and Design achieve 75%customer X X X Severn/Staff No satisfaction by 4th quarter. 2.2 Construction Management achieve 75% X x X Severn/Staff No customer satisfaction by 4th quarter. 2.3 Operations achieve 75%customer X X X SevernlStaff No satisfaction by 4th quarter. M:WPDOCSVTCLIoPADMKPLN Page 1 of 4 Milestones Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 3. CRISP to RJN Interface Tasks 3.1 Provide an interface to automate transfer of X SevernlStaff No motor run times data to the RJN Database. 4. Ocean Outfall Booster Station J31-2 Tasks 4.1 Assist Consultant to develop ladder code. X SevernlStaff No 4.2 Assist Consultant and Contractor in system X Severn/Staff No testing. 4.3 Connect Ocean Ouffall Booster Station into X Severn/Staff No main SCADA system. 4.4 Assist Consultant to develop ladder code for X SevernlStaff No IMFS, 5. Headworks-Plant 1,J31.3 Tasks 5.1 Assist Consultant to develop ladder code. X SevernlStaff No 5.2 Assist Consultant and Contractor in system X Severn/Staff No testing 6. Secondary Control System Upgrade -Plant 2, J31-4 Tasks 6.1 Assist Consultant to develop ladder code. X SevernlStaff No M WPDOCSVTCLKTAMWKPLN Page 2 of 4 1 / 1 1 1 i t I Milestones Goal Qn- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 7. Metra Human Machine Interface-Plant 1 Tasks 7.1 Upgrade the MMI at Digester Control Center. X SevernlStaff No 7.2 Upgrade the MMI at Cake Transfer Control X SevernlStaff No Center. 8. Report Generation -CRISP Tasks 8.1 Operation to review reports formats. X Severn/Staff No 9. Headworks - Plant 2 ask 9.1 Hardware upgrade. X Severn/Staff No 9.2 Develop ladder logic and MMI graphics. X SevernlStaff No 10. Power Monitoring Tasks 10.1 Develop Scope of Work for pilot project. X Severn/Staff No 10.2 Installation of power monitor system X Severn/Staff No hardware. 10.3 Develop CRISP and Streamine graphics. X Severn/Staff No 10.4 Develop power monitor reports. X Severn/Staff No 11. Streamline Clients-NT Tasks 11.1 Install Streamline server software. X Severn/Staff No M:WPDDCSVTCLKIPAMWKPLN Page 3 of 4 Milestones Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 41h Qtr going Responsible Board 11.2 Develop graphics and test interface. X Severn/Staff No 11.3 Operations to review graphics X Severn/Staff No implementation. 12. PLC Upgrades Tasks 12.1 Upgrade PI-Cs and update ladder software. X SevernlStaff No 12.2 Upgrade Hot Standby PI-Cs and update X Severn/Staff No ladder software. 12.3 Upgrade Cogeneration FT100 software. X Severn/Staff No 12.4 Replace MCC FT100 hardware with PLC. X SevernlStaff No 13. Finance Development Tasks 13.1 Set up training with the Finance Department X Severn/Staff No to educate IT managers and supervisors: re The processes and procedures related to proper fiscal management, accountability and justification. M VJPDOCSUTCLKWADWJKPLN Page 4 of 4 Facilities Management FY '96 - '97 WORK PLAN Milestones Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 1. Ensure work units are competitive by analyzing Staff None and eliminating Impediments within our control and recommending changes in other areas. Plan staffing levels and apply technology in a proactive manner. Participate in capital improvement process focusing on lowering life cycle costs. Tasks: 1.1 Participate in GSA Marketing Strategies X Arhontes No development process. 1.2 Participate in Collection System O&M X Arhontes No market definition study. McCusker 1.3 Provide recommendations to assist X Arhontes No Management in reducing Administrative McCusker Dept. costs by 5%for FY 97/98. Forman 1.4 Participate on Task Force to develop X Arhontes No alternate Confined Space work procedures McCusker and possible savings. 1.5 Develop a mechanism to analyze and report X Arhontes No on issues creating impediments to Supervisors competitiveness. Foremen RdWPDOC\\arhonlesVmdgels\workpin.96 Page 1 of 5 Milestones Goal Qn- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 41th Qtr going Responsible Board 1.6 Develop a staffing plan for FY 97198 X Arhontes No focusing on no staff increases and utilizing Supervisors more outsourcing. Foremen 1.7 Participate in CIP process. Focusing on X X X X X Arhontes No reducing the life cycle costs of the facilities McCusker managed by these Divisions. Forman 2. Maintain regulatory compliance within our areas of responsibility, commensurate with the funding and resources provided. Tasks: 2.1 Participate on Sanitary Sewer Overflow X X X X X Arhontes No minimization strategies and resource needs. McCusker 2.2 Participate on Air Quality Compliance X X X X X Arhontes No issues. Forman 2.3 Assist Communications Division on issues X X X X X Arhontes No related to Collections System O&M. McCusker 3. Assist the Agency with knowledge and experienced-based input In order to develop an agency wide strategic plan for our service area. Tasks 3.1 Participate in CIP J40-1 regarding collection X X X X X Arhontes No system issues. McCusker Blanda 3.2 Develop a rolling five-year outline for GSA X Arhontes No resource needs. Supervisors Foremen R.AWPDOCVarhontesUdgels%mrkpin 96 Page 2 of 5 Milestones Goal On- 1 at Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 3.3 Assist with outreach strategy development. X Arhontes No 4. Assist In the development of compliant and cost-effective safety systems, policies and procedures to protect our employees and the environment. laska 4.1 Participate in the development of the X X Arhontes No Integrated Emergency Response Plan. McCusker Forman 4.2 Participate in the development of the X % X X Arhontes No Hazardous Energy Control Procedures. McCusker 4.3 Participate in the Safety Policy Review X X X X Arhontes No Committee. 5. Assist the agency and its communications programs by providing information and support In order to build stronger working relationships within our watershed. Task 5.1 Provide input on GSA responsibilities and X X x X X Arhontes No capabilities. McCusker Forman 5.2 Work with Communications Division to X Arhontes No develop a customer comment form for the Collection System O&M Division. R:\WPDOCParhontes%udgels\workpin.96 Page 3 of 6 Milestones Goal ° let Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 5.3 Meet and discuss common issues and X X Arhontes No develop stronger dialogue with all City and McCusker Agency Collection System Managers. 6. Provide employee support and training opportunities to ensure that we have a trained and flexible work force. Task 6.1 Identify crosstraining opportunities and X Arhontes No needs within GSA. Supervisors Foremen 6.2 Identify insourcing capabilities of GSA staff X Arhontes No for short term use by other divisions. McCusker Forman 6.3 Mentor GSA staff on the agency's cultural X X X X Arhontes No and organizational changes. 6.4 Monitor staff performance on utilizing X X X X X Arhontes No training and educational programs. McCusker Forman 7. Support Improvements in management performance thru the adoption of improved cost accountability and utilizing performance measurement and benchmarking as tools to enhance productivity. ask 7.1 Participate in monitoring and reporting of X X X X Arhontes No workplan performance. McCusker Forman RIWPDOCUrhontesftdgeWmrkp1n.96 Page 4 of 5 1 / 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 3 1 1 4 1 1 4 1 7 1 1 I I 1 I I 1 1 I I I I Milestones Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 7.2 Monitor and report on implementation of HR X X X X X Arhontes No performance review and individual Supervisors development programs for GSA staff. Foremen 7.3 Monitor monthly budget compliance with X X X X X Arhontes No staff. Supervisors Foremen 7.4 Assist with phase in of new FIS and identify X X Arhontes No training needs for staff as well as CMMS Supervisors development issues. Foremen 7.5 Monitor compliance with FY 96/97 X X X X Arhontes No performance objectives. Supervisors Foremen 7.6 Support GSA staff with benchmarking X X X X X Arhontes No development. Supervisors Foremen 7.7 Determine detailed modifications needed for X Arhontes No CMMS as a result of GSA formation. Supervisors Foremen 7.8 Implement a capital funds reimbursement X Arhontes No program for non-maintenance related tasks. Forman 7.9 Participate in FY 97/98 budget preparation X X Arhontes No and workplan development process. Supervisors Foremen RIWPDOMNarhonlesl udgeWworkpin.96 Page 5 of 5 t a a t a t a a a t t a it a a a a t Operations & Maintenance Administration FY '96-97 WORKPLAN . r r � Goal Qn- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr I 4th Qtr I going I Responsible Board Od Implement Competitiveness Plan 1.1 Establish 5-year O&M manpower plan. X Oaten,Cook, Finlas,Jones, Esquer 1.2 Develop Competitiveness Plan action plan. X oaten, O&M X supervisors 1.3 Hire consultant as required. X X Oaten X 1.4 Monitor and participate in national X X X X Oaten competitiveness planning. 1.5 Establish O&M teams to develop the X Cook,Finlas, competitiveness plan. Jones, Esquer 2; Re-engineer O&M Organization Pro77 cedures � � a\ a Mons and Practices. IV 2.1 Define job tasks and level of difficulty, and X X Flanagan assign performance levels. 2.2 Define performance levels. X X Flanagan, Finlas, Cook 2.3 Develop plan to decrease nonessential work. X X O&M Supervisors R.\WPD0CW10VnIMG0ALS19597W0RK.PM Page 1 of 9 Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 2.4 Develop outsourcing criteria and list potential X X X O&M tasks to be outsourced. Supervisors 2.5 Develop supervisory work responsibilities X X O&M list. Supervisors 2.6 Develop supervisory work responsibilities X X O&M evaluation criteria and provide evaluation. Supervisors 2.7 Develop comprehensive list of X O&M recommendations to enhance Supervisors competitiveness. ry ,gyp • Vy _ .,tu•'.'fr=' 3 � F Q .xF C�E s Ir 41k >+. FC ME 3.1 Develop automation recommendations. X X X O&M X Supervisors 3.2 Develop staffing savings plan estimates. X X Ooten M�w . '' 3:• •i 4.1 Establish cost centers to better define costs. X Ooten, O&M Supervisors 4.2 Develop historical cost trends. X X Ooten,Arnold, O&M Supervisors 4.3 Establish performance measures for all X X Ooten,O&M areas of the plant and compare with plant Supervisors data. R:\WPDOC\3410RJO\GOALS\9697WORK.PLN Page 2 of g t r r t r _ r t r , U r-_ t _ U.- r _ U r_ U_ It _ U U- . t a t a a a a a a a a a a a a a t a a ,.r Goal °n tst Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 4.4 Establish benchmarks of performance. X X Ooten,O&M Supervisors � PIRfO$w�S�' 4 r a ,^ « NOne 5.1 Develop an Integrated Emergency X X Jones,Cook, Response Team. Finlas,Pigmon 5.2 Support development of an Industrial X % Jones, Cook, Hygiene Plan. Finlas, Pigmon 5.3 Assist with development of Hazardous X X Jones,Cook, Energy Control Plan. Finlas,Pigmon MMMIM M. 6.1 Develop 5-year staffing plan based on X Ooten projects, automation and cross-training. 6.2 Develop plan to productively utilize staff X X Ooten during transition caused by automation and cross-training. Ma Ad „- lf 4Ns f3Nt°�6✓as8 .N+ < a a� �a �, ' 11 < �A 7.1 Develop list of plant O&M requirements for X Ooten plant evaluation task of Strategic Plan. 7.2 Support all elements of Strategic Plan. X X X X O&M X Supervisors R:% PDOC\3410RJO\GOALS'269T ORK.PLN Page 3 Of 9 Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr Ah Qtr going Responsible Board 8. _Develop Employees T�I� p r 'Trdined Work 6C "� s N ° 5 8.1 Develop cross-training plan. X X X 08M Supervisors 8.2 Develop certification levels. X X 08M Supervisors 8.3 Definejobtasks. X X 08M Supervisors 8.4 Classify job tasks to certification level. X X 08M Supervisors •.4. Evaluate plant process and systems In order to �` ,, , ""•^- �,gi, �. P9> i,�., r Shy a tone ' z : g' 9.1 Identify list of process cost reduction and X Esquer, optimization opportunities Herberg, Hetherington, R.Thompson 9.2 Prioritize list by order of cost effectiveness X Herberg, and benefit to the Districts Hetherington, R.Thompson, Arnold 9.3 Develop implementation plan for projects. X Herberg, Hetherington, R.Thompson R:\WPDOC\3410URJO\GOALS\9fi9TNORK.PLN Pape 4 of 9 Mlestgne.�, Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 41th Qtr going Responsible Board 9.4 Implement teams and begin optimization X Esquer work 9.5 Monitor progress and report achievements X X 9.6 Follow-up X X 10. Complete benchmarking efforts started In 1995196 fiscal year and begin new study. Expand 1995196 study to include additional agencies ,Tasks: £`sy- 10.1 Review 1995/96 study and debrief X Esquer,Arnold X 10.2 Work with Td-Agency to develop Scope of X Esquer,Arnold Work and goals and objectives for 1996/97 study 10.3 Assist Tri-Agency procure benchmarking X Esquer,Arnold consultant 10.4 Assist Tri-Agency in developing X Esquer,Arnold benchmarking database 10.5 Publish draft Benchmarking Report X Esquer,Arnold 10.6 Publish final Benchmarking Report X Esquer,Arnold 11.1 Review capital program and develop plan to X Esquer, accomplish at least 80%of project work Kraemer R UPDOCcW1 ORJ0\GOALSG697wORK.PLN Page 5 of 9 Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 11.2 Begin work on projects X x X 11.3 Review progress and provide summary X report of progress to Department 11.4 Begin planning next 1997/98 fiscal projects X X 11.5 Publish list of 1997/98 projects and required X budget paperwork in•!,� < ,� , , „ &i tiG a 'k, €k Eaquor,Arnold. None glMM AMIN II1' �, ,..;; �14 . 0 �a i ` i e s e E 77, NO M 14.1 Develop mission statement for group X 14.2 Develop goals and objectives for group X 14.3 Develop goals and objectives for staff X 1loj�antl P " ' MAIN ri razt Tare§ "ri a a� .. .. , , 15.1 Develop criteria for evaluating and ranking X special projects and research 15.2 Rank currently budgeted projects and X research consistent with this criteria R:\WPDOC\3410\RJOXGOALSl 697WORK.PLN Pepe 8 of 9 r i- c-_ c- t- ��+13Cestane�, Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 15.3 Allocate resources to the highest priority X X projects 15.4 Develop project plan and staff accountability X methods \ PC. >.a?`i. \ ° � , ,Fx a sty f➢$,/ .3 �: r Psj8is°s ' ;use i 16.1 Team with O&M staff and other departments X for opportunities to reduce costs or improve compliance 16.2 Review literature,vendor information and X X X X consult with other POTWs on new technologies 16.3 Develop criteria for evaluating and ranking % special projects and research 16.4 Rank potential special projects and research X that should be pursued over the next 3 years 16.5 Finalize plan X s \ \ \ P' n3 i ''i �. l .:> E3y SSE 7j/' f1 (t`��j' t� #NW�.Mtid: )�T`x. .�.y.s�� s \ IL f d" M;K';A 7`r " at�za (a" „ Busy ; \, r•' 17.1 Develop and maintain an effective process X X for communicating compliance requirements to O&M field staff, GSA staff and Engineering R:\WPDOC\3410\RJO\GOALS\9697WORK.PLN Page 7 of 9 Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 17.2 Work with Technical Services to stay x abreast of new legislativelregulatory developments that may impact our operations related to air quality 17.3 In conjunction with the training division, x x Identify training needs of field staff to effectively monitor and record compliance Information and operate air pollution control equipment 17.4 In conjunction with Technical Services,track x all compliance dates and prepare and submit all compliance reports on time 17.5 In conjunction with Technical Services x develop and Implement an auditing program to evaluate and respond to our status of compliance with air quality requirements "fiats F11 18.1 In conjunction with GSA, study and X determine the optimum control option(s)for reducing odorous emissions from our collection systems and treatment plants 18.2 In conjunction with GSA, optimize the X chemical usage for trunkline and in-plant chemical usage R:\WPDOC'34re\RJOIGOALS\969]WORK PLN Paps a of e r r U [ - I- " a'•3' 961 ez3�tY I!'f Goal On- tst Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 41th Qtr going Responsible Board 18.3 Optimize chemical usage in odor control X scrubbers 18.4 Evaluate efficiencies in the resources utilized X in monitoring for odor emissions and make improvements where appropriate 18.5 Ensure timely and accurate Investigations x into odor complaints and follow-up actions T�t1F�P � Pop Parnllt F y y � „ Torres,Ahn Nona 19.1 Consult with O&M,GSA, Engineering and X Technical Services to optimize our permit conditions to provide increased flexibility and reduced manpower usage 19.2 Submit application for revising permit X conditions to SCAQMD 19.3 Identify alternative operating scenarios X 19.4 Submit Plant No. 2 Title V application X 19.5 Submit Plant No. 1 Titie V application X R:\WPDOC�1410V JO%GOALSWe97WORK.PLN Page 9 of 9 1 1 1 8 1 1 / C 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Operations and Maintenance Scheduling FY '96-97 WORKPLAN Goal on- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 1.1 Draft goal statement FY 97198, X Burrill R4 1.2 Draft work plans FY 97/98. x Burrill 1.3 Finalize goal statement work plans for X Burrill Distribution FY 97I98. 1.4 Monitor work plan monthly FY 96/97. X X X X Burrill and staff 1.5 Evaluate divisional progress of work plan goals x x x x Burrill to stay on target. N E f t, 'Al LollFEt .E x5ef � �9�1 e�y 4 ar d I 2.1 Cross train the Division between disciplines. X x X X Burrill 2.2 Monthly safety meetings. X X X X Burrill and staff 2.3 Promote non-mandated voluntary certifications. X x x X Burrill 2.4 Promote outside education. x x x x Burrill R9WPD0CSURRILLl9697P/0RK.PLN Page 1 of 4 Milestones Goal on- 1st Qtr I 2nd Qtr I 3rd Qtr I 4th Qtr going Responsible Board f `O nr � ' tW�_ ( kprafects 8R I, � rrj ,,... . None%'.: ,a NO . VIR " .>Ixx'�..��u 3.1 Test and pilot project coordination to support X Burrill and staff research. 3.2 Assist In development of job plans. X Burrill and staff 3.3 Assist in technical data submittal reviews. X X X X Burrill and staff 3.4 Assist in outside work force coordination. X X X X Burrill and staff 3.5 Monitor customer satisfaction surveys for each X Staff major service. 3.6 Coordinate large multdisciplined tasks to X X X X Burrill and staff make the most efficient and effective use of labor and material resources. 3.7 Develop sluice gate exercising program for X Staff critical gates at Plant No.2 influent metering station and headworks. r '3... t errsY, { ` ='F sf3 1�1g 1 3 d) ¢ SIP @° n'a, W ' ��#�r�i ' Eau•>. ^x�q :r &�� .R'h, §�.�� J,. r. 4.1 Investigate current P.M.frequency's to maximize X Burrill and staff time without jeopardizing the reliability of the equipment(analysis of present data). 4.2 Forecast and recommend new time frames for X X X X Burrill and staff P.M.'s that qualify. 4.3 Track trend and report to division on a monthly X X X X Burrill and staff basis-P.M.to C.M.ratio's by area. R'AWPIDOMBURRIL0981MWORK.PLN Pap 2 of 4 r III_ r- f — e [— r r-- U-- U7: U- Ir U— r e e e e e e e e e It a e e I) e e e e a L ,`. i[ebas`e Goal On, 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 4.4 Develop means to track wrench time in C.M.M.S. X Burrill and staff and implement this process in areas 10. 11 and 12. 5 rt9YNnrWbeH�io`a so mvel( 5.1 Review and recommend deletions, X staff consolidations, amount on hand and buy as needed items,to free up needed space and eliminate no longer needed parts on over 13,000 items. To fine tune overall warehouse inventory. Iz. ys 6.1 Define criticality of equipment to the process. X Burrill and staff 6.2 Establish (define) priorities of equipment X Burrill and staff 6.3 Establish means to forecast available X Burrill and staff manpower. 6.4 Evaluate total planned maintenance data and X Burrill work loads for possible implementation and education of all Operations and Maintenance staff on new policy and procedures of the total planned maintenance program. RiwPDO=URRILL1969TW0RK.PLN Page 3 of 4 Pf` yLLy''fjP�'' k Goal On- 1st Qtr I 2nd Qtr I 3rd Qtr Ah Qtr I going Responsible Board IN `r,;4 `^Ra f �'`�`lt3 � d3 1fx I MR 7.1 Monitor and discuss budget concerns X X X X Burrill and staff during weekly meetings with divisional staff. r iEk x N ' one BR, a btiV$n o- 3' r i° '' a `.. /r 1 8.1 Review P.M. frequencies to reflect run hours X X X X Burrill and staff versus fixed time maintenance as plant process equipment becomes automated. tie" �ye>�IW n11 s None I SLOW 9.1 Study and evaluate future work loads to X X Burrill properly evaluate divisional manpower needs through 2001. R9wP00C\BURRILU9697wORK.PLN Pape 4 of 4 C--- C C` C [- t a a a a a a a t a 8 a a a it a It a a Plant No. 1 and 2 Operations FY '96-97 WORKPLAN Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsiblelg Board .o MENEM 1.1 Assess Impacts to the operation of the plant X Flnias/Cook facilities Including a 5-year staffing plan. 1.2 Provide input to plant automation task force. X X X FlniaslCook 1.3 Adjust operational task and job X X X X X FlniaslCook responsibilities to incorporate automation and computerized system. 1.4 Provide training to staff who wilt be involved X X X X X FlniaslCook with the new automation systems. s a ? n T Norte t ,t' EI d . 2.1 Assess training needs. X X Flnias/Cook 2.2 Coordinate training activities with new job X X X X Flnias/Cook tasks. 2.3 Assist in development certification levels for X X Finlas/Cook crosstraining. 2.4 Provide Input to Training Division in X Flnlas/Cook developing and implantation of districts wide training philosophy. RAWPDOMNIASIWORK.PLN Page 1 of 3 f Goal On, 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board ;3 cs e i e2 3.1 Identify major cost items and initiate. X FlnlaslCook 3.2 Train staff to identify budget needs. X Flnlas/Cook 3.3 Establish and develop plant proficiency X X X X X Flnias/Cook teams with Operations&Maintenance,and Engineering staff to identify cost saving technics and measures in daily plant activities. 3.4 Assist Accounting Division in establishing X X Flnias/Cook plant needs for the FIS computerized accounting system,currently in development. 3.5 Reduce overtime by 5%. X Flnlas/Cook 4.1 Provide resources that will support program X Flnlas/Cook and bring the Districts into full compliance - with applicable laws. 4.2 Provide adequate training and information to X FlnlastCook employees to enhance their assimilation of the program. RMPDOC\FINIAS\WORKPLN Page 2 of 3 1 t H fl fl H H H d l fl H U U H 8 fl H fl a., Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible � Board af`dIrettion and fait °II%sk t` 1'> NK 41A MINOR fl, Mf 'M O am 5.1 Provide job description,duties and X FlniaslCook responsibilities for each employee. 5.2 Develop criteria to measure productivity, X FlniaslCook completion of projects or step in projects, and technical skills. . 2 k , � NO A k k I {sE 7.1 Assist with Competitiveness Plan elements X X X FlniaslCook and development. 7.2 Establish with Training Section competitive X X X FlniaslCook employee team leaders. 7.3 Develop operator cross-training tasks at X X Finias/Cook 10% level. R:IWPDOCTINIAMWORK.PLN Page 3 of 3 t a t t e u a a e t t t a a e a a e a Mechanical Maintenance FY '96-97 WORKPLAN Goal On- 1st Qtr I 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board WE ION 46' - ..^j�l •'�if,�Cx. . 4Er2Ci '4?;'.,.iKl u.. E 1.1 Work with CMMS Administrator to develop X Pigmon/Chapman target areas. 1.2 Begin test run of data collection and X Chapman/Staff documentation by close of 2nd Qtr. 1.3 Evaluate progress and make final comments X Pigmon/Chapman by close of 3rd Qtr. 1.4 Put system into service to meet the X Chapman/Staff objective. .` a 2.1 Work with Human Resource and Training to X Pigmon/Chapman develop training plan. 2.2 Implementation of training. X Chapman/Staff 2.3 Evaluate and clarify requirement for Division X Pigmon/Chapman to be Operations certified. RI WPDOCWIGMONAWK96_97. Page 1 of •39f': .I".. Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd EQtr 4th Qtr goring Responsible Board r .i � tt, wN 1 I iI x, l' • a� eEaI� xn,�., ., ,.ins �. ti} s•;5e; i 3.1 Training for Senior Mechanic in work order X Chapman/Maffhews processing. 3.2 Training for Senior Maintenance Workers in X Chapman work order processing. Matthews/Reeves 3.3 Develop plan and check feasibility of cross X Pigmon/Chapman training of Maintenance Staff formerly Division 3330. 3.4 Supervisor to submit training plan. X Chapman 3.5 If plan is feasible, set program to close by X ChapmardForeman 3rd Qtr. yy� 'NMI pm yra a� 2lr yak., �" 4.1 Evaluate work loads from combining X Pigmon/Chapman Division. 4.2 Evaluate work being done by cross training. X Pigmon/Chapman 4.3 Submit report on results. X Chapman RAWPDOC\PIONION W OO 97. Page 2 of 4 0 mug Goal Qn- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr I 3rd Qtr 41h Qtr going Responsible Board 35gy m e w 0 2 } x r. � INS kd E £. 11, x.a 7 pip, ExE".x d$ z'�� xl'x. i 3 w F. 5.1 Provide input and support. X Pigmon/Chapman/Staff 5.2 Provide information on isolation levels and X Pigmon/Chapman/Staff quantities of each type of isolation required. �. ys � �E t 3 ` A,u' irFw� r� �s .Fn n Fy. 5 •--`"`.E,3 AiF "_ '.,..7 NO E e 6.1 Evaluate the potential for improved X Pigmon/Chapman productivity by cross training with other Maintenance Divisions. 6.2 Evaluate levels of technical competence X Pigmon/Chapman required and determine cost effective cross training opportunities. € aP� ' 7.1 Develop plan with CMMS Administrator. X Pigmon/Chapman 7.2 Implement plan. X Chapman/Staff 7.3 Evaluate plan and results. X Chapman/Foreman R:MP000TIGMOMWK96_97. Page 3 of 4 i 3R art,., E di Goal On- (( 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr I 3rd Qtr Ah Qtr going Responsible Board 8.1 Conduct monthly meetings to discuss budget X Pigmon/Chapman/ expenditures and account status information. Foreman e 9.1 Discuss proposed project programs and X Pigmon/Chapman division goals. Foreman 9.2 Discuss departmental goals with X Chapman department head. 9.3 Develop work plan for fiscal year 1997-1998. X Chapman 9.4 Implement 1997-1998 July 1,1997. X Chapman f;WVPD00WkiMONVAM i7. Pegs 4 of 4 r. r: r-- r- r- t7 I c: r- r 17 r-. t_ r- [ - Electrical Maintenance FY `96-97 WORKPLAN Milestones Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board Mll y � i Ate 51 NOW t� _gantzaMAtomeetthe � ,� §API • � rY4 operations.: a � � ,'• �1 p � +s3ft:i 1.1 Evaluate the potential for improved % JoneslCatacutan productivity by cross training with other RameylTucker maintenance divisions, 1.2 Work with operations and maintenance staff X JoneslRamey to develop work team opportunities. 1.3 Evaluate levels of technical competence X RameylTucker required and determine cost effective cross Catacutan training opportunities. 0,10 "ap ;. � � _:.,...., >sL4� k�:'i�a . B 8 to b•�ei :F 'e 11 2.1 Provide information on isolation levels and X RameylTucker quantities of each type of isolation required. Catacutan 2.2 Assist with hazardous energy program X JoneslTucker templet document development which will become standard format for lockout-tagout in the Computerized Maintenance Management System. r.WocyonestelWXwakpina6.060 Page 1 of 6 Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 41th Qtr going Responsible Board 2.3 Develop program for Electrical Division to X AegerterlRipley implement hazardous energy control Basga111Lorrimer documentation program based on needs assessment conducted by Safety and Emergency Response. 2.4 Implement hazardous energy control X Ramey program. 3: � ?'d� � 'j � 3 3 lf• i rv'k Z J YMO OR, 3.1 Evaluate technical training needs for division X Jones personnel. 3.2 Develop division technical training program X Jones\Ramey details based on needs assessment developed in the first quarter. 3.3 Implement technical training program subject X JoneslRamey to available training funds. xs;. •sty v a � s @ ;'ea�a ' s � � it 4.1 Develop procedure for generation and X Jones%Tucker signing off preventive maintenance work orders completed by operations. r\wpdoo\jones\enect\w;kpin96.060 Page 2 of 6 [ C_ C [_ _ T t — aC_ r_. I-- Z. _ IF _ V_ I [ r [ L C a a a e a a a a a a (I a a t a d a c Mtlastanas " Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 4.2 Assist training staff with training X Jones\Tucker requirements to implement cross training Catacutan items from O&M list developed during fiscal year 1995.96. 4.3 Implement cross training program for X JoneslRamey operations and maintenance staff. 4.4 Assist Director of Operations& Maintenance X Jones with the evaluation and clarification of requirements for maintenance division personnel to be operations certified. t 5.1 Map details for 12-Kilovolt five(5)year X Jones/Ramey baseline program. 5.2 Develop scopes of work for A& B X Ramey Distribution at plant NO. 2. 5.3 Bid scopes of work for A&B Distribution. % Ramey 5.4 Perform baseline studies testing for X Ramey Electrical Distribution system. r9wpdocyaneslelectiwrkp1n96.060 Page 3 of 6 Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board l �ion a +� ( b •u� ix( x� a l�� 1 S3 q.`x � ��`�,r.".r�'.fY 6.1 Identify records which need additional X TuckenRipley Information to complete technical data. Catacutan 6.2 Assign data accumulation to staff by plant X Tucken and area. Catacutan 6.3 Enter data collected by staff. X Aegerte6Basgall LorrimerlRipley 6.4 Audit equipment records for completeness. X Tucked Catacutan IR It o, 7.1 Implement daily breakdown of hours worked X JoneslRamey in the CMMS for all categories using activity type as a sort field. 7.2 Evaluate maintenance intervals for X AegerterlRipley preventive maintenance database. Lorrimen8asgall 7.3 Generate monthly reports to monitor wrench X Tucken time components for CM, PM, and Capitol Catacutan Improvements. r9wpdocyonesWeatwrkpine6.o60 Page 4 of 6 i- I t t r-- t - r r - r r- r- IF r- r- c Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr Ah Qtr going Responsible Board 7.4 Conduct monthly staff meetings to evaluate X Jones reports to increase wrench time. ;R. IMZ.. 8.1 Generate monthly reports identifying PM to X Tuckerl CM man hours worked ratio. Catacutan 8.2 Allocate resources to ensure required X Jones\Ramey preventive maintenance work is performed and backlogs are at an acceptable level. 8.3 Conduct monthly staff meetings to evaluate X Jones reports and implement staffing changes as required to maintain PM to CM ratios. RIPad.. 4 Nona i 9.1 Conduct Monthly Meeting to discuss budget X Jones expenditures and account status information. r*jxl=9onesielectlwrkpin96.060 Page 5 of 6 Goal On- let Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 10.1 Meet with Director of Operations& X OotenlJones Maintenance and discuss fiscal year 1997- 98 goals. 10.2 Meet with Division supervisors and discuss X JoneslCatacutan fiscal year 1997-98 goals. Rameyrrucker 10.3 Develop Work Plan for Fiscal Year 1997-98. X Jones r:k pdccjonealeledWkpin96o60 Page n of 8 t r 11_ r - L- r-- t7 r_ : U- i__ [— r- r- [- Instrumentation Maintenance FY '96-97 WORKPLAN M%sfonesAN Goal On- list Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr I 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 66ment wA the aR it v wt q r a3 I` �' K 1.1 Evaluate the potential for improved X Jones\Lebrun productivity by cross training with other BrookslCardona maintenance divisions. 1.2 Work with operations and maintenance staff X JoneslLebrun to develop work team opportunities. 1.3 Evaluate levels of technical competence X Lebrun%Brooks required and determine cost effective cross Cardona training opportunities. npl Ncnw 2.1 Provide Information on isolation levels and X LebrunlBrooks quantities of each type of isolation required. Cardona 2.2 Assist with hazardous energy program X JoneslBrooks templet document development which will become the standard format for lockout- tagout in the Computerized Maintenance Management System. RiwpdocyonesVnstlwrkp1n96.e70 Page 1 of 6 WE Goal QR' 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 2.3 Develop program for the Instrumentation X IbarralStuht Division to implement hazardous energy ClarklThompson control documentation program based on lock and tag needs assessment conducted by Safety and Emergency Response. 2.4 Implement hazardous energy control X Lebrun program. ra 8 nya '°� G as y ,yygga ; rry None a a ? 3.1 Evaluate technical training needs for division X Jones personnel. 3.2 Develop division technical training program X Jones\Lebrun details based on needs assessment developed in the first quarter. 3.3 Implement technical training program subject X Jonesllebrun to available training funds. ra "None h"7?'SfiSW, 4.1 Develop procedure for generation and X Jones%Brooks signing off preventive maintenance work orders completed by operations. R:twpdocyonesvnsawrkpinse.ma Page 2 of 6 Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 4.2 Assist training staff with training X Jones%Brooks requirements to implement cross training Cardona items from O&M list developed during fiscal year 1995-96. 4.3 Implement cross training program for X JoneslLebrun operations and maintenance staff. 4.4 Assist Director of Operation&Maintenance X Jones With the evaluation and clarification of requirement for maintenance division personnel to be operations certified. "M 5.1 Map details for VFD replacement program. X JoneslLebrun 5.2 Collect data and develop database X Lebrun information to evaluate drives. 5.3 Work with engineering to budget proper X Lebrun funds for replacement program. 5.4 Work with engineering develop scope of X Lebrun work for replacement program. R:\wpdocyonesVnsAwrkp1n96.070 Page 3 of 6 Ay Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board �. � ��N �g5�y e E I' ..,,h91a• '' to •.," t ��fa �E:S as ��(4 ��{laa 3 ' a _ ,.r„ 4•c•w'^ .3 s„s,., ,<.!.` I• tc� ,fit. , i� t� 6.1 Identify records which need additional X BrookslCardona information to complete technical data. 6.2 Assign data accumulation to staff by plant X BrookslCardona and area. 6.3 Enter data collected by staff. X IbarralStuht ClarklThompson 6.4 Audit equipment records for completeness. X BrookslCardona e' �� a,asslonty {,,; .a a f r �}{r��i3j4iti M yy .. a 56, Ron 1 $ 1 jati 3t88r"I .. r. �i '.,a. P e F MI 7.1 Implement daily breakdown of hours worked X JoneslLebrun in the CMMS for all categories using activity type as a sort field. 7.2 Evaluate maintenance intervals for X IbarralStuht preventive maintenance database. ClarklThompson 7.3 Generate monthly reports to monitor wrench X Brooks%Cardona time components for CM, PM, and Capitol Improvements. 7.4 Conduct monthly staff meetings to evaluate X Jones reports to increase wrench fime. R:\wpdocyoneSVnst*rkp1n96.070 Prigs 4 of 6 r r Milestones Goal ° 1st otr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 8. Allocate adequate human resources to ensure None a 2:1 preventive maintenance to corrective maintenance.man hours worked ratio. Tasks: � 8.1 Generate monthly reports identifying PM to X BrookMCardona CM man hours worked ratio. 8.2 Allocate resources to ensure required X Jones\Lebrun preventive maintenance work is performed and backlogs are at an acceptable level. 8.3 Conduct monthly staff meetings to evaluate X Jones reports and implement staffing changes as required to maintain PM to CM ratios. 9.1 Conduct monthly meetings to discuss budget X Jones expenditures and account status information. R:WrysocyunesVnstWnkpin9So70 Page 5 of 6 .5A+fps Qp(pa Goal Qn- 7st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board L F ; i a s 10.1 Meet with the Director of Operations 8 X OotenUones Maintenance and discuss fiscal year 1997- 98 goals. 10.2 Meet with Division supervisors and discuss X JoneslLebrun fiscal year 1997-98 goals. BrookslCardona 10.3 Develop Work Plan for Fiscal Year 1997-98. X Jones R:lwpdocyonmMnsnwrkpin96.070 Page 8 of B U Y_ +r- z —, c- c- Ic- C- z _ U a _ t- ar- r Ic_- T7 U r- t Central Generation FY '96-97 WORKPLAN milestones Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 1. Re engineer 0&M at CenGeni and CenGen2 � s,;"� N Inky Imo: E yy�. 1.1 Evaluate current practices and procedures. X Zomynaki 1.2 Integrate O&M within PPO crew. X Zorzynskl 1.3 Evaluate productivity and cost efficiency. X Zorrynski Plant Automation Plan °.� ' � ui' „g 2.1 Provide support to PAG for CRISP X Zorzynski changeover. 2.2 Provide input for future projects for X Zorrynski automating facilities. 2.3 Evaluate network needs for CenGen data. X Zorrynski Develop action plan and implement. 3. Maintain safe workplace, Tasks :.None 3.1 Maintain OSHA compliance. X Zorzynski 3.2 Continue SOP development. X Zorzynski 3.3 Provide support for Hazardous Energy X Zorzynski Control needs assessment. RAVVPDOVZORZYNIGOALs96.WPD Page 1 of 2 Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr Ah Qtr I going Responsible Board 4 MaatdGomptCe 5 1� rp r •� 4.1 Maintain SCAQMD compliance. X Zorzynski 4.2 Maintain FERC compliance. x Zorzynski 4.3 Maintain 95/5 rule strategy. X Zorzynski 5 implement Departmental Training Program !7 is. ,bask {3 5.1 Evaluate and report training needs. X Zorzynski 5.2 Evaluate and implement cross-training of X Zorzynski CenGen staff. 6. Define Division staging needs for 5-year plan. 'a1 dew t;, arh Task re. ,! z�s.an `i��'.w %. V .c'.w�' . �� 1�fw`` 6.1 Evaluate work loads. X Zorzynski 6.2 Develop 5 year staffing estimate X Zorzynski 6.3 Develop plan to be @ privatized level of X Zorzynski staffing. 6.4 Develop time accounting system. % Zorzynskl R\WPDOCIZORZYNIGOALS96.WPD Peps 2 012 f: L-: L= tr. t_. i Technical Services Dept. FY '96 - '97 WORK PLAN NJ Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board a n �1 3 2.1 Identify responsible staff and contract x Robertson personnel by program element 2.2 Determine appropriate approach to X Robertson conduct new monitoring program 2.3 Develop scope-of-work for new x Robertson, monitoring program Haydock 2.4 Develop Request for Proposal(RFP) X Robertson for contracted portions of monitoring program. 2.5 Determine appropriate mix of In-house X Moore, and contractual monitoring work. Robertson 2.6 Determine and assign personnel to X Robertson eliminate duplicate efforts 2.7 Track and evaluate progress. X Moore, Robertson J:My�57 alssg'colston7xarkpWn.lstl N. Goal On- 1st Qtr I 2nd Qtr I 3rd Qtr I 4th Qtr I going I Responsible Board 3.1 Finalize proposed new ocean X Moore, monitoring program (Compliance— Robertson, Special Studies—Regional Colston components) and present to state and federal agencies 3.2 Provide support to the program design X Robertson, process by preparing data and ECM Staff Information. 3.3 Participating in meetings and X ECM Staff communicating our understanding of environmental Impacts to Interested parties. 4.1 Participate In SCCWRP's strategic X Moore,Haydock, planning Robertson 4.2 Provide SCCWRP staff and CSDOC X Moore,Haydock, SCCWRP Commissioners Information Robertson and support to evaluate,focus and carry-out SCCWRP's mission 4.3 Continue participation In CTAG;provide X Haydock, input and direction to SCCWRP Robertson Research Plan 4.4 Continue participation in various X Haydock, SCCWRP regional monitoring Robertson committees I.l p13510tssg)wWon\xor1*n.t9d C C 9r r I I iC T _ t i f i C i_ [_. Goal On- tst Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board Ell 5.1 Reevaluate audiences)and X Moore Informational products 5.2 Identify the format of a program(s)to X Moore share environmental Impacts from our activities with Interested parties 5.3 Identify time frames and frequency to % Moore provide documentation/presentations of activities concerning the environment 5.4 Report/present Impacts of our activities X Moore on environment to Interested party(s) 5.5 Evaluate all compliance reporting % Moore, products. Robertson, Haddon 5.6 Develop Information reporting on x Hadden,Baroldi, legislation and regulatory Issues. Colston 5.7 Develop now brochures X I:Wp'3510tssg`cols onlworlplan tad TECHNICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT FY '96 - '97 WORK PLAN Goal °n 1st gtr 2 d gtr 9rd Qtr 4t t poinq� es onslble Board MMill S • � A 1.1 Determine the laboratory producli ty by type It Section None of analysis&develop goals and opportunities Supervisors for improvement by benchmarking against competitive laboratories 1.2 Develop productivity Improvement goals by X Lab Manager 6 None type of analysis for Inclusion In FY i Section budget Supervisom 1.3 Maintain a current laboratory accreditation It Dan Tremblay None from the California Department of Health Lab Mgr 6 Services(DHS)and provide the monthly Section discharge report to the Regional Water Supervlsom Duality Control Board and the Environmental Protection Agency O:bWbYiw 506_971bgErw4h W Pop tot1 ti►iieEoiie Goad ]Sd_Qtr 2rld QiL IfA Qt[ nth Q_t_[ I Ee5R911slkl@ eoar� < ; Integrate Computer system to link users and gain on-line access to data .� bases: : 2.1 Implement the Laboratory Irtotmallon X Den Tremblay None Management System to 75%lunctlonal Supervisors a status by year and FY 19W97. Project Specialist 2.2 Complete Initial application development % x Lab Mgr, Project none Including sample managemenl, sample Specialist 3 scbeduling, data capture,database Section development, and Initial report customlzallon. Supervisors OleVe VN aylee_97bgdtwrkpin9e.tsd Page 2 of 4 ' 0 ,� a W s Goal tz 1st Utr 2nd t]tr 3rd Otr 4t tr In I I 13 erd 3 fiesfrlicKnrd bc6ti mdilfortu pcagtam tb lettuCO tlV bh Ot Watt 8fll� n rrec g ntefto 'Co On 3.1 Evaluate leasbllity of performing chemical X Organic 6 None analysis on ocean sediments& general PCBs Inorganic In-house Chemistry Section Staff o:triabv ayse_WGgitwrIWh*abd Page 3at4 [- c t- c- t- c- c-� t- c t---- C . t_ i . nr 17 t- Goal Qn- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board fill, A ��rionitbrn€ ptn�ra a H 4.1 Review and revise the laboratory X Lab Mgr, Plan None Chemical Hygiene Plan to Include all Review Team especls of lab safety and to Increase ease of use by lab personnel 0:taV W*Wbrey98_97bgdlwrlgr1n99.IW Page 4 of 4 Technical Services Dept. FY '96 - '97 WORK PLAN Mllestgnt3s ' Goal °n 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board C:M, s 1.1 Establish business community needs by X TalebflRenescu No outreach and by assessment of the business community's governmental/regulatory requirements. 1.2 Establish the scope of the program by X TalebilRenescu No evaluation of the assessment and outreach reports,and resources needed. 1.3 Develop Issue"brochures. % TalebilRenescu No 1.4 Conduct informational workshops with the X TalebilRenescu No business community and other involved entities. 1.5 Form an advisory team consisting of the X TalebgRenescu No business community and other involved entities. 1.6 Develop program mechanism. X TalebgRenescu No 1.7 Establish implementation strategy by pilot X TalebilRenescu Yes/No program and development of resources needed. J.UpV5901burleq voan.496 Environmental Compliance and Monitoring Division FY '96 - '97 WORK PLAN On- Goal 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 1. Finalize Structure of ECM Reorganization ibne t 1.1 Hire ECM Manager X Wheatley 1.2 Identify and confirm air program X Moore,Hadden responsibilities between ECM and the Operations Department 1.3 Replace old EMD name plates,Infout X Moore,Ubaldini boards,etc.with ECM 1.4 Modification to ECM facilities X Mitchell(Engrg) 2 Restructure ocea rl m4tldoiing Prb9remto redueedutsltaa oiiafstaffandtonsu0ny, efforts Tasks 2.1 Identify responsible staff and contract X Robertson personnel by program element 2.2 Determine appropriate approach to conduct X Robertson new monitoring program 2.3 Develop scope-of-work for new monitoring X Robertson, program Haydock 2.4 Develop Request for Proposal(RFP)for X Robertson contracted portions of monitoring program. I:W,pZ5101ss&dVwo rkpFan two Page 1 of 8 Mjiestones Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 2.5 Determine appropriate mix of in-house and X Moore, contractual monitoring work. Robertson 2.6 Determine and assign personnel to eliminate X Robertson duplicate efforts 2.7 Track and evaluate progress. X Moore, Robertson t s W h„ as T (taa4ivaness141 3.1 Finalize proposed new ocean monitoring X Moore, program (Compliance-Special Studies- Robertson, Regional components)and present to state Colston and federal agencies 3.2 Provide support to the program design X Robertson, process by preparing data and information. ECM Staff 3.3 Participating in meetings and communicating X ECM Staff our understanding of environmental Impacts to Interested parties. %oordirfate 8CCV11RP 10 Improve repbnaf . t Yes 4.1 Participate In SCCWRP's strategic planning X Moore,Haydock, Robertson I:WpM etsag%o"MWmrkpian.tvm Pape 2 of ill 141Af sty es 77 Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 491 Qtr going Responsible Board 4.2 Provide SCCWRP staff and CSDOC X Moore,Haydock, SCCWRP Commissioners information and Robertson support to evaluate,focus and carry-out SCCWRP's mission 4.3 Continue participation in CTAG;provide Input 1( Haydock, and direction to SCCWRP Research Plan Robertson 4.4 Continue participation in various SCCWRP % Haydock, regional monitoring committees Robertson �. �n a k: Lnkbowq 5.1 Reevaluate audience(s) and informational X Moore products 5.2 Identify the format of a program(s)to share % Moore environmental impacts from our activities with interested parties 5.3 Identify time frames and frequency to X Moore provide documentation/presentations of activities concerning the environment 5.4 Report/present impacts of our activities on X Moore environment to Interested party(s) 5.5 Evaluate all compliance reporting products. X Moore, Robertson, Hadden k wpl lassebolslonl rkplan.two Page 3 of 8 Milestones Goal on- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 5.6 Develop Information reporting on legislation X Hadden,Baroldl, and regulatory Issues. Colston 5.7 Develop new brochures X f m � 3� t 6.1 Communicate to all ECM staff the X Moore Importance and value of teamwork and communication 6.2 Identify and prioritize training needs for X Moore,Redden, supervisors and staff In team building and Robertson communication 6.3 Evaluate and support team building and % Moore,Haddon, communication skills Robertson 6.4 Identify opportunities for forming X MooreIECM staff intralinterdWlslonal teams,and Implement as appropriate �r s ti i d a. r�I •�x•i'i!R}, �, 1:, i a 7.1 Update mission statement for division X Moore, ECM Staff 7.2 Update goals and objectives for division X Moore, ECM Staff I:wpzSlmss&o1sron*Oo j lan.hW Pegg 4 of 8 Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr I 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr I going Responsible Board 7.3 Develop goals and objectives for ECM staff X Moore,Hadden �c Robertson ♦i Cbd }. .. k � tFi +5htn(pfn WON Orange Gonfntj 'fH9r , '=-xe �` : 4 3g{ " 8.1 Co-ordinate staffing levels of fair booth. X Team Leader 8.2 Co-ordinate fair participation with OC Fair X Team Leader officials. 8.3 Evaluate survey demographics. X Team Leader 8.4 Evaluate effectiveness of Fair participation X Team Leader 8.5 Develop staff report for Exec.Management X Moore,Team and OMTS. Leader T84 ia�aa ,. 9.1 Identify regulatory compliance requirements X Moore,Hadden for water,air,and land. Robertson 9.2 ID resources needs to support regulatory X Moore,Hadden, compfiance programs Robertson 9.3 Coordinate permit and compliance Issues X Hadden,Cowan (Underground tank permits, DMR review,etc) 9.4 Exchange Information with agencies and X Moore,Hadden organizations to promote the Robertson Districts'mission. t:1w0351e1ssMw1slonlwnrkp1an.Mro page 5 of 8 Milestones„ Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 9.5 Respond to notices of new regulations. X Moore,Hadden 10. Regulatory and legislative tracking �"k ,p'itEu }K x fir« _ Nene Tasks_ `y G?,+ •„a s. e. 3�" a ?„ „ 10.1 Identify and Track federal, slate, and local % Hadden,Baroldl, legislation and regulations having a potential Colston to affect the Districts'. 10.2 Provide analysis to affected Districts X Hadden,Baroldi, depadments/divlslons. Establish a Colston benchmark for Identification and dissemination. 10.3 Provide comments and proposed X Hadden,Baroldl, modifications consistent with the Districts' Colston Interest to leglslators/regulatom. 10.4 Provide advocacyttestimony at hearings and X Hadden,Baroldi, workshops. Develop&maintain relationshlps Colston with regulators. 10.5 Develop analysis strategy using on-line and X Hadden,Baroldi, written services to provide the most Colston economical use of resources. 10.6 Acquire and assemble a centralized resource X Hadden,Baroldi, of legislative/regulatory Information and Colston references for the Districts. 10.7 Assess need for all Information sources. 1t Hadden, Baroldi, Colston I1wpQ5101ss&o1stonXmr*plan two Pape B of a Ofiefty Goal On- tst Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board N 9"N"7,N I N, & 11.1 Review documents to be sent to regulatory X Moore, Hadden, agencies to ensure standardization of Input Robertson and compliance with agency requirements. 11.2 Perform compliance assessments on various X Hadden,Cowan Districts'facilities and operations. 11.3 Maintain a central permit file for all Districts X Hadden,Baroldi, permits and applicable regulations. Colston 11.4 Complete development of a database X Hadden, Baroldi, software for permit tracking. Compare Colston LACSD database if available. 11.5 Maintain database of permit requirements. X Hadden, Baroldi, Colston 11.6 Inform appropriate Districts staff of upcoming x Moore,Hadden reporting requirements. 11.7 Provide follow-ups to ensure permit X Moore,Hadden, requirements have been complied with. Robertson "1P1 Yphl _l, psi' ±• ? 12.1 Provide support with blasolids In order to X Moore,Baroldi maintain the NPDES permit and waiver. t:*p%351 0tss&ds1=Ww kp:an No Page 7 of 8 Ni'�►¢�to�tes . Goal On' 7st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 12.2 Assist with the reapplication process with the X Moore,Baroldi blosoilds portion of the permit. 12.3 Provide legislative and regulatory support to X Moore,Baroldl Operations to ensure compliance with biosolids handling requirements. 12.4 Provide assistance to ensure contractors are X Moore,Baroldl In compliance with applicable laws and regulations. �ii "Ii Maintain 6l s c a6tili Tb nie :, ._ . • ;:. ,a.. ., .. ..t. , k ,y..i . ?.:+ . Expertise 13.1 Maintain active participation and X Moore,Hadden, membership In various professional Robertson organization that represent the Districts' Interests. 13.2 Attend and report on workshops and other X Moore, Hadden, external professional organization meetings Robertson I\.pll5Ms8'WMoM.,kplan.h Page a of a [ F f E 6 AT F C _ if- - rf T f - T C . C (I--. r- ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES LABORATORY FY '96 - '97 WORK PLAN Milestones Goal °n 1st atr 2nd atr mot: � t t 9oing t3�st�onsible � Board j Determine the laboratory productivity y " by type of anal sis & develop goals YP l P and apportuN es for Improvement by benchmarking against competitive �za �� fiP s a 3 ya laboratories, , Inks. 1.1 Determine the number of analyses(by type) % Section None per analyst per unit lime Supervisors 1.2 Develop benchmark standards of analyst X Section None productivity&develop cost of analysis data Supervisors 1.3 Determine optimized productivity per analysis % Section None by performing process capability studies on Supervisors selected analyses 1.4 Develop productivity Improvement goals by X Section None type of analysis for urcluslon In FY 97198 Supervisors budget 0I t9VOb�.PN y�_aWbg�.,kplr%.,I Page 1 of 7 Mll�s�oriiss Goal On- 1st Qg 2nd Qtr �r.tl qtr Out qtr oin ges IN Board 2. Determine and measure customer defined quality standards for the E54 79.= 2.1 Podonn survey of customers for lab service X Lab Mgr 6 None and reports Section Supervisors 2.2 Implement corrective action on suggestions 50% 10096 Lab Mgr & Section None Supervisors 0 bVabVno eyM 97bgd!rkpIn96.es1 Page 2 of 7 i I � a�jjr y I I i Goal t Qtr 2 t 3rd Qtr t t oin onsible —Board 3. Monitor activities In support of general =E programs Including: NPDES permit requirements, source control, surfzone monitoring, and operations process i monitoring and improvement. 3.1 Pmduce the Discharge Monitoring Report E Den Trembley None (DMR)on schedule and include a summary Lab Mgr& report In the monthly report to management Section Supervisors 3.2 Work with RWOCB to optimize the report X Dan Tremblay None structure. Complete discussions and report recommendations 3.3 Implement an automated report X Dan Tremblay consistent with implementation of LIMS 0:ravmmowdey�96_e]gptwnrins6.atl Page 3 of 7 Milestones Goal °nn-- 15t QSC 2nSL9tL I $Ld 9?r itli-Otr g0ing neSp4i1- IS ble Boprd ""t3evett3p a stlsietri monitoring improvements In overall lab quality. 4.1 Establish quality tracking measures (e.g. out- X X Dan Tremblay None of-spec data,deficiencies on quality audits, Lab Mgr 6 etc)for all sections of lab Section Supervisors 4.2 Delennine the number of out-of-compliance X Dan Tremblay A None Hems by section and report to Individual lab DA Staff section within 1 month of audit comolefion. 4.3 Perform laboratory quality evaluations X X Dan Tremblay & None (audits), at least 2 per section oar veer. DA Staff 4.4 Issue section report, including time for X Lab Section None completion, on corrective action plan on out- Supervisors of-compliance Issues within 1 month of audN report . 4.5 Maintain a current laboratory accreditation X Dan Trembley None from the Calgomia Department of Health Lab Mgr 6 Services (Di and the Environmental Section Protection Agency by suaessfully analyzing Supervisors blind check samples and by successfully passing DHS audit. 0 MVabVn .yam 97hgd rkpin%.,I Page 4 of 7 Milestones Goal _ _ 1st Otr 2nd Qi 3rd On- Qft 41 h atrwing gespQnspit Board 5, Implement the Laboratory information Management System to 75%functional status by year end FY 1996197. IdS.Ct�: 5.1 Develop system requirements and complete % Dan Trembley None assessment of the appropriateness of the Supervisors R current Fisons system Project Specialist 5.2. Develop implementation RFP for the Flsons x Dan Tremblay 6 Yes system or H required by the assessment Project findings,prepare an RFP for migration to Specialist another LIMS vendor. 5.3 Select contractor for the Flsons X Dan Tremblay Yes implementation,or recommend a new Lab Mgr & vendor for LIMS Section Supervisors 5.4 Submit to the Boards of Directors in % Dan Tremblay & Yes November 1996, and assuming approval, Project Issue a LIMS Implementallon1migrallon Specialist contract 5.5 Complete Initial application development X X Lab Mgr, Project none Including sample management, sample Specialist& scheduling,data capture,database Section development, and initial report customization. Supervisors 0:muabMowbray59_97bgdl.wrWh%.e Page 5 of 7 �: , Ml%stones Goal 1sc Ot[ znd 41tr_ rs�Otr 141h G1t[ g4ing F1€sp9osL4le @Qas! 6. In conjunction with the Environmental Compliance and Monitoring Division develop a plan and Implementation strategy for optimizing productivity In the Ocean Monitoring program. 6A Participate in loam meetings and provide % % ESL Staff, Ocean None data to asssist in decision making process Monitoring Sect. 6.2 As appropriate and defined by the project x ESL Staff, Ocean None learn, support the consolidated Ocean Monitoring Sect. Monitoring Plan 6.3 Evaluate feasibility of performing chemical X X Organic 6 None analysis on ocean sediments 6 general Inorganic PCBs In-house Chemistry Section Staff 0 Mirt, no ,196_97becl rkp?nss.eM Page 6 of 7 Milestones , Goal 1st otr 2nd Otr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 7. Support the District Wide Safety policy. 7.1 Review and revise the Laboratory X Lab Mgr, Plan None Chemical Hygiene Plan to Include all Review Team aspects of lab safety and to Increase ease of use by lab personnel 72 Participate In Districts wide safety 6 X Laurie Bluestein, None Integrated emergency response team to Lab Staff assure a sale working environment 7.3 Complete project to Install flow control X Fred O'Brien None monitors In all fume hoods. 7.4 Complete project to Install fume vent In X Charles McGee None bacteriology and Improved air-flow in Kim Christensen organic laboratory Fred O'Brien O.IeVab"owbrayM 97b9 t wlhpin98.ee1 Page 7 of 7 1 .1 fl fl fl A i k 1 1 fl 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 fi 1 Source Control Division FY '96 - '97 WORK PLAN , Goal I On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board « y 1 Devalop a layhnicai g515lapca prg9fptrl ford - k •°�' business to maintain high pedamtahce in ' �+�r ,,�'� s . ' t $ogfcpfiioll('0 a 1.1 Establish business community needs by X TalebilRenescu No outreach to existing organizations and by assessment of the business community's governmentaltregulatory requirements. 1.2 Establish the scope of the program by X TalebilRenescu No evaluation of the assessment and outreach reports,and resources needed. 1.3 Develop'issue'brochures. X TalebilRenescu No 1.4 Conduct informational workshops with the X TalebilRenescu No business community and other involved entities. 1.5 Form an advisory team consisting of the X TalebilRenescu No business community and other involved entities. 1.6 Develop program mechanism. X TalebilRenescu No 1.7 Establish implementation strategy by pilot X TalebilRenescu No program and development of resources needed. I:'wpZ5Maur1eWm*p1an.496 ` �il�iiesto es Goal On- 1st Qtr I 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr I going I Responsible Board 2. Develop a marketable,automated permit and •{o-� 01"7".44 monitoring program to provide Source Controlservices to other sanitary districts.Tasks: , . ., .. .,., 2.1 Develop computer regeneration of self- X Taleb VWybenga No monitoring forms. 2.2 Develop and complete tables for enforcing X X Talebi=ybenga No the monthly limits,adding constituents,and changing production-based limits to other categories. 2.3 Develop computer generation of self- X X TalebiNybenga No monitoring notices of violation and resampling. 2.4 Develop computer generation of historical X TalebilWybenga No flow and monitoring data summaries('S Menu")from the Oracle Database. 2.5 Develop the capability to regulate Total Toxic X X TalebilWybenga No Organics on constituent-byconstguent basis. 2.6 Complete the technical aspect of generating X TalebilWybenga No a marketable, automated permit and monitoring program. 2.7 Develop a partnership with the General X TalebVWybengal No Services Department to determine Hodges marketability of product and a marketing plan. I:Wip%3590VaurleWmrxplan.495 E f E E [ E .r C C.. [ C [ [ E ` Nli�esion Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 3. Ensure that Source Control staff will lakem �ry timely, preventative enforcement andfollow-up action to ensure that 90/ or better of Significant Industrial Users are in compliance s onaquarterly bd315,_r 3.1 Require Source Control engineers to X Renescul No Investigate any permittee violations within 30 Evangelista days from the date of violation. 3.2 Require Source Control engineers to take X Renescul No timely corrective and follow-up actions to Evangelista ensure long-term compliance of permitlees. 3.3 On a quarterly basis,permiVenforcement X X X % Renescul No supervisors will review their staffs Evangelista productivity. 3.4 On a quarterly basis,permiVenforcement % X x X Renescul No supervisors will provide a report on each of Evangerrsta their staff indicating actions taken by each staff and the percent compliance rate of each staffs permidees. 3.5 Ensure that Source Control staff involved will X Renescul No have adequate training,support,and Evangelista/ guidelines to conduct their duties. Talebi f'gvpt3590Vaurle§rvrkf�an.496 Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 4p,linsurithat Source Corirolmspeptfohstaff Will bonduct within 90%or better of a quarlerlY .. _;• fi -. ,�.-. - . , x , ._ .zr`zEb4.. �£,3-P - .f.kai ,3. S. 4.1 Require Source Control Inspectors to X Christensen/ No conduct all required Inspections and McCarthylBenzie sampling in a timely manner. 4.2 Require Source Control inspectors to X Christensen/ No resample and reinspect noncompliant McCarthylBenzie permillees within 30 days from the date of violation,in addition to required sampling and inspection. 4.3 On a quarterly basis, Source Control field X X X X Christensen/ No supervisors will review their stairs McCarthy/Kenzie productivity. 4.4 On a quarterly basis,Source Control field X X X X Christensen/ No supervisors will provide a report indicating the McCarthylBenzie number of monitoring events and field projects completed by each of their staff. 4.5 Ensure Source Control field staff involved % Christensen/ No have adequate training,support,and McCarthy/Benzie guidelines to conduct their duties. /Talebi I:rwp195WVaurlelworkplan.496 E [ _ Ir E E C C C [ [ C [ _ C [ - [.- I[ E— C-- C_ a a a a t a e a a a a a a a a a a a a IAa a Goal Qn- Ist Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr I 4th Qtr going Responsible Board $ � � �1 1$� :YV�Iil tr Ile �V Id N's „y.� �� <C • $ ? a I ;� C�(,i• a �a 5.1 Require Source Control engineers to process X Renescul No and complete all permit renewals prior to the - Evangelista expiration date,with no exceptions. 5.2 Require Source Control engineers to process X Renescul No and complete new permit applications within Evangelista 30 days from the submittal dale of the application. 5.3 On a quarterly basis,permit/enforcement X X X X Renescul No supervisors will review their slaf's productivity Evangelista and permit renewal deadlines. 5.4 On a quarterly basis, Source Control X X X x Renescul No supervisors will provide a report indicating the Evangelista percentage of permit renewal and Issuance within the set criteria. 5.5 Ensure that the Source Control staff involved X Renescul No will have adequate training,support,and Evangelistal guidelines to conduct their duties. Talebl I:Mp�3MVauaeWxftlan.496 f ��x: xXt � "wA1�:� { �h,'�, �_Mf�e�1~Q�L9 Goal On- �* 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 6. Develop technically baserlocallPmll a'1µf �'ua1T � `� ,t, r ' 'a yE ' Task HOW )' � eia6 4 ,n "a$ •r.3a .d `.° �¢t&ii . 6.1 Evaluate the results of the Non-industrial X Wybengarralebi No Source Control Program sampling. 6.2 Review and evaluate other Districts' X Wybengafralebi No approved local limits reports. 6.3 Propose technically based local Ilmits X Wybengafralebi No (existing or new)for technical and legal review. 6.4 Incorporate all comments and prepare a X Wybengafralebi No draft proposal for public(industrial and regulatory)review. 6.5 Incorporate the public's comments and X X Wybengafralebi No prepare a draft for final technical review and comment. 6.6 Conduct a workshop to discuss issues X WybengafTalebi No related to the Implementation of local limits. 6.7 Prepare a final report for Board approval and X Wybengafralebi Yes adoption. I:r ;,1359ovaunet rkplaa.496 1 e t e - U . [_._ r-- r- V. r- U_— e r._ 'Pell � Goal on' 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board wy 7. Achieve competitive practices. Tasks rsv S �, ,`,+,.�.. .x.,.e_r x�« Ysu. .+sSa!*�.&§ <"x ' .u� tlen.ardt': 7.1 Evaluate the Source Control Division's X TalebU No current functions and practices. Supervisors 7.2 Assess the effectiveness of current practices X TalebU No vs'market conditions". Supervisors 7.3 Determine changes and Improvements % X TalebU No needed to become competitive. Supervisors 7.4 Evaluate available resources vs. X Talebil No recommended changes. Supervisors 7.5 Develop a plan of action and schedule for X Talebil No implementation of the recommended Supervisors measures. 7.6 Provide a report with a recommendation for X Talehi/ No management's review. Supervisors 7.7 Develop a final plan of action for X TalebU No implementation. Supervisors IAwptn59oveudawmrtlan.4ee 0 i 9 9 9 0 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 a 9 9 Engineering Administration FY '96-97 Work Plan Milestones C Goal °n 7st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going I Responsible Board •a. 1. Develop and implement ' �� • .:s competitiveness plan. i`'` ' •" r Tasks' 1.1 Conduct internal audit of engineering project X Ludwin None management procedures and develop Mathews revised procedures and training plan. 1.2 Review and assess current Engineering X Ludwinl None Department policies and procedures and Division staff responsibilities,and Implement Managers revisions to increase efficiency. 1.3 Assess engineering administration and X Ludwinl None project management costs for all phases of Division project development and Implementation. Managers 1.4 Develop budget preparation and monitoring % Ludwinl None process for all engineering projects to Division improve cost effectiveness. Managers J\WPO UOWIM EPORT ORRPLAN Page 1 of 2 Qn- Goal 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 2, Develop and implement Plant Automation Plan Pgr 2.1 Form project team to oversee planning and X Ludwin/Hodges None implementation of Plant Automation project. 2.2 Develop Scope of Work and select X Plant Yes consultant to prepare Plant Automation Automation Master Plan. Team 2.3 Develop comprehensive Plant Automation X Plant Yes Master Plan and begin implementation of Automation recommendations. Team 2.4 Assess status of J-31 consultant contract/ X Ludwin/Mitchell Yes work and develop revised approach to finalize contract. A. Improve CIP process and project delwe P P 1 rY ��m E sai E, r, ° j xre «i Tasks � x � ,�:. ri °� \:�:..r. , 3.1 Redesign CORP and Districts'CIP X Ludwin/Dawes None budgeting procedures to allow more accurate and proactive budgeting of projects,that can be more easily presented and understood. 3.2 Prepare quarterly CORP and Districts'CIP X X X X Dawes None Budget expenditures reports. 3.3 Develop detailed project schedules to allow X Ludwin/Mitchell None more effective project management and manpower projections and allocations. J\WPO UOWMViEPORTSWORNPLAN Page 2 of r - r - r r r r r r r r IF r r- r-: r- r- r - r" r-; a a 1 a a a a a a r a R a o a a a a 1 Engineering Design Division FY '95 - '96 Work Plan 7777771111 Nlilesranes Goal On- 1st Qtr I 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr I 4th Qtr going Responsible Board °'1 improve competdlvobess by streamlining11� ', �l{ 6 "�`� engineering daSlgn funcdons ¢r° ; � - i �' i � �. r ' km 1.1 Track time spent on work function to develop X Engineering No a baseline of time costs. Manager/Project Managers 1.2 Develop plan for collecting data for work X Engineering No function analysis. Manager/Project Managers 1.3 Evaluate work functions to establish levels of X Engineering No Importance. Manager/Project Managers 1.4 Analyze work functions for opportunities for X X Engineering No streamlining Manager/Project Managers 1.5 Implement streamlined procedures X X Engineering No ManagerlProject Managers 19wpdw"ftche1lXmrkp1an.sam Page 1 of 4 t (i : �N Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 2.1 Develop database of task time requirements X by monitoring staff activities and review of Mitchell/Winsor industry standards. 2.2 Utilize strategic plan results for collections X Engineering No projects staffing projections. Manager/Winsor 2.3 Support Planning Division with development X X X Engineering Manager No of facilities master plan and work forecasts. 2.4 Develop FTE demand for engineering X Engineering Manager No project phases `IM�. � II.. E_ W :t ;�.- . v 3.1 Assess Clearing House Group practices and X Engineering No opfmlze procedures Manager/Mitchell 3.2 Implement design consultant procurement X Mitchell Yes procedures 3.3 Implement streamlined reporting procedures X Mitchell No I:WMdxMHchell Wmkplan.mm Page 2 of 4 t [. 1. . [ t [. .. C.. [. t [. . t C: U f [ F C_. r_. C_. fl I 1 1 fl H 1 [ H fl [ H [ 1 [ 1 H H fl Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board m irla 3 Mrs v'v>. 4.1 Relate division demands to staff skills and X Winsor identify deficiencies 4.2 Work with with Training Division to identify X Winsor training resources and coordinate training. 4.3 Work with staff to clarity career path goals, X Winsor interests and abilities 4.4 Develop and implement plan for training staff X Winsor to acquire desired skills In 1 £ E f 4 y u�.:v01QM 5.1 Establish engineering technician pool so that X Engineering Manager all technicians are exposed to all types of engineering support work 5.2 Train the technician group leader to provide X Engineering Manager the necessary leadership 5.3 Identify potential additional skills for design X Engineering staff which are valuable to the agency and Manager)May reasonably attainable. 5.4 Develop and implement training plan X May i:PvpdocVritchenmrkplan mm Page 3 of 4 Goal Qn- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 6.1 Develop project management procedures % Engineering and tools Manager/Mitchell 6.2 Develop training program for project X Engineering managers Manager/Mitchell 6.3 Improve project tracking and reporting to x Engineering some project management Manager/Mitchell Jlwpdm"ftcMIl rl#w.sam Page 4 of 4 r E r - r - U r - r I I I r _ r c I r_ r r- c c._ a I 1 a a a a i a it a e a a a a 11 a a Engineering Planning Division FY '96-97 Work Plan Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 1.1 Provide monthly reports and newsletter to X Dawes No executive management,telling them tasks completed and tasks planned to insure that management can effectively monitor the strategic plan development. 1.2 Meet with regulatory agendas,the agencies X Dawes No we serve, and other stakeholders to Insure the development of the strategic plan meets users needs. 1.3 Assist in the Implementation of quarterly X X X X TuchmanlDawes Yes board meetings. 1.4 Develop Scope of Work for Treatment Plant X Dawes Yes Planning Effort,Phase 11 of Strategic Plan. 1.5 Develop Scope of Work in PSA for Phase II X Dawes Yes Strategic Plan, CEQA Compliance J:=PDOC�NOMMOAL5425 Page 1 of 2 � � -1N' lesfnnes Goal On- 1st Qtr I 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board rr , 2.1 Prepare a Draft Design Manual and circulate X Dawes No In-house departments and selected outside consultants. 2.2 Incorporate comments and publish X Dams No �f Engineering Department Design Manual y ¢ 1 d9 6 JMVIROOMNIMTMDWOAIBAS Page 2 of 2 r- r- r_-. r- r r r- r_- r- r- it v. r.- c-. r- a a I I a a a a a t a a a o a a a a a ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION DIVISION FY '95 - '96 WORK PLAN r S Goal On- 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr going Responsible Board 11itHd 1111iF�i�b � 64711186k HHI p 7 a Y '� s £ E y' tftv ,,,v va ti" s 9 �ra Onistogagri �k�p 5� a .� L- �€ 1.1 Conduct regular weekly construction x John Linder No supervisory staff meetings. 1.2 Hold monthly Engineering Department John Linder No meetings at construction division with all X supervisory&professional staff of Engineering Department. 1.3 Develop monthly construction status report % John Linder No OR PA ea 2.1 Invite contractors currently working for X X X X John Linder No Construction Division to attend. 2.2 Discuss current safety data and selected X X X X All who attend No topics at the meetings. 2.3 .Provide current safety concerns to Safety X X X X Construction No Division for discussions. Staff p:%WPD=ENGZ790\W0RKPLAN.SAM 1 of 3 Goal Qn- 7st Qtr I 2nd Qtr I 3rd Qtr I 4th Qtr I going I Responsible Board n still=rffM a9 EMEW a 3.1 Establish training for recurring subjects,such Supervisory No as: Confined Space,First Aid,CPR,Lock X Const.Inspector and Tag out,and Building Codes. &Eng.Supervis. 3.2 Develop and implement technical training X Chris Cervellone No program. ES -'ME 4.1 Identify items which can be charged to X X John Linder No construction contracts which are now Linda Himenes charged to the J.O.budget. 5.1 Identify areas of Construction Manual which X Chris Cervellone No require changes 5.2 Make the changes and print new manuals X Chris Cervellone No Linda Himenes 5.3 Identify areas of construction OA/OC manual X Terry Kris No which require changes 5.4 Make the changes and print new manuals % Terry Kris No Linda Himenes jJ1WPD=ENW79MWORKPLAN.SAM 2 of 3 C C C- IF [— r- r Lr r C C U7 C r-7 F F — C C-- a a a t a H H a H H a H H a a a a a a 'M'ileStofi�s ;F Goal On- 1st Qtr I 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr Min Qtr I going I Responsible Board 5.5 Establish a QC Inspection check list X John Linder No 5.6 Establish a safety inspection check list X Chris Cervellone No e. 99 a � 6.1 Refine erisbng manpower tracking X Chris Cervellone No documents 6.2 Obtain data for cost of supervision and X John Linder No administration (and Inspection)for construction projects 6.3 Obtain cost data for construction change X Chris Cervellone No orders 7 Enhanee Oesign FeeddS °folfoond INR n �d,}9q : ah,.r t ' 7.1 Use existing constructability review forms by X Charles Pasinli No providing guidance to users 7.2 Use existing feedback forms by providing % Chris Cervellone No more Information and guidance to staff IJAWPD0CrENGW9e\W0RKPL N.SAM 3 of 3 County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Final Consolidation Report June 17, 1996 Prepared by: Ford Sauvajot Management Group, Inc. 6902 Wallsey Drive San Diego, CA 92119-2040 Tel. (619) 589-0460 Fax (619) 589-0266 Ford Sauvajot Management Group, Inc. Public Financial& Management Consulting TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary i 1. Introduction 1 2.Description Of Current Districts 4 3.Description Of Joint Works Operations,Budget And Capital Program 10 4. Consolidation Of Districts 34 5. Time Table To Implement Consolidation 45 6. Conclusions And Recommendations 47 Exhibits EXHIBITS Exhibit 1 General Information - Individual Districts Exhibit 2 Districts Budgets for Fiscal Year 1995-96 Exhibit 3 Capital Improvement Projects- Fiscal Year 1995-%- 2000-05 Exhibit 4 Joint Works Facilities Capital Improvement Expenditures-Fiscal Year 1995-% Exhibit 5 Budgeted Capital Improvement Projects- All Districts-Fiscal Year 1995-96 Exhibit 6 Certificates of Participation Issued by the Districts as of June 30, 1995 Exhibit 7 Allocation of Outstanding COP Debt to Issuing Districts Exhibit 8 Consolidated District Board of Directors Pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 4730 Exhibit 9 Consolidated District Board of Directors Pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 4730.1 Exhibit 10 Service Area Map Exhibit 11 A0 Districts Summary- Operating and Other Funds Exhibit 12 Districts' Board of Directors Exhibit 13 IRWD Credits and Reserves EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION The purpose of this section is to highlight briefly the major findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the study. It contains sufficient information to be used as a "stand alone" document for use by the general public or for an introduction to the more substantive body of the report. A. Purpose of the Study and Scope of Services The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC) engaged the services of the Ford Sauvajot Management Group, Inc. (FSMG) to provide technical assistance and analysis to CSDOC for the preparation of a comprehensive report to support the consolidation into a single District the nine County Sanitation Districts which have joined together in the ownership, operation and construction of wastewater facilities (mown as CSDOC. The study evaluates the benefits and probable terms and conditions which would achieve the consolidation of the nine Districts into a single, integrated County Sanitation District. The study and the report are for the exclusive use of CSDOC in its determination of a proposal for district consolidation to be made to the Local Agency Formation Commission of Orange County (LAFCO). The study, accordingly, was conducted with considerations for the preparation of an application to consolidate the Districts. This report forms the basis for documenting the advantages and disadvantages of consolidating the Districts. FSMG consultants worked closely with the staff of CSDOC to produce a far and impartial analysis and conclusions to assist the CSDOC Joint Boards of Directors. B. Conditions Leadine To Consolidation And Historical Backeround The Joint Boards of Directors have, over the past years, reviewed the issue of consolidation. The 1981-82 Grand Jury issued a report recommending that the Boards consolidate the then seven Sanitation Districts into one district with Board membership based on a smaller group of elected representatives. In 1983 the Joint Boards determined that the Districts' operations were functionally consolidated and no significant overall benefit would accrue by reorganizing into a single District. Today, there is a growing public concern over the number of special districts serving the needs of California residents. This concern is directed primarily toward improving customer services which are believed achievable through the opportunities that consolidation may offer. Opportunities are believed to exist in this proposed consolidation by simplifying governance strucnrrm, easing administrative processes, streamlining decision-making procedures,and simplifying some accounting and auditing functions. The County Sanitation District of Orange County,Executive Summary Page i Prepared by Ford Sauvajot Management Group,Inc. 6117/96 In many respects, the decision to analyze consolidation alternatives for CSDOC is the beginning of the final chapter in an evolutionary consolidation process that began several years ago. The original Sanitation Districts, which were formed in 194748, banded together to finance the acquisition of the Joint Outfall Sewer's (JOS) treatment and disposal facilities along with its property and a network of trunk sewers in each of the original districts. The JOS had been previously established in the 1920's by a joint operative agreement among several Orange County cities and sanitary districts. Subsequently a Joint Administrative Organization was formed to administer the business activities of the jointly owned treatment and disposal facilities(Joint Treatment Works). C. History of the Current Proposed Consolidation At the Joint Boards meeting of January 11, 1995, the issue of consolidation was raised and staff was directed to evaluate it and report to the Executive Committee of the Joint Boards of Directors. Staff reports were presented in January, February and June 1995 outlining the major issues. Subsequently, on July 26, 1995 the Joint Boards of Directors received and filed a staff report dated July 14, 1995. The July 14, 1995 staff report recommended, in part, "The consolidation of the nine separate districts into one single Sanitation District; with a single board of directors made up of one representative each for each city, sanitary district, water district and unincorporated portion of the county within the Sanitation Districts' service area now represented on one or more of the existing nine Sanitation Districts; and direct staff to initiate all steps necessary, including the LAFCO process, to complete a reorganization of the Sanitation District." The action of the Joint Boards of Directors on July 26, 1995 considered that consolidation of the Districts was a complex matter which needed further study. This study report is, therefore, intended to assist the Joint Boards of Directors in evaluating all appropriate courses of action. D. Process for Proposed Consolidation The Districts would be consolidated (reorganized) into a single County Sanitation District pursuant to the California principal act pertaining to County Sanitation Districts, California Health and Safety Code Section 4700, et seq. The consolidation process is subject to LAFCO approval. However, if each District approves a resolution applying for consolidation, LAFCO is obligated to approve, or conditionally approve, the proposal. The consolidated District would establish special zones pursuant to Government Code Section 4850 et. seq., with boundaries similar to those of each of the predecessor Districts to continue charging differential sanitary sewer service charges, the collection of property taxes, and for the retirement of outstanding debt incurred by each former District. The new County Sanitation District would have a single Board of Directors. The composition of the single Board of Directors for the newly consolidated District would The County Sanitation District of Orange County,Executive Summary Page u Prepared by Ford Sam pt Managcment Gmup,Inc. 6/17/96 vary depending on the section of the principal act utilized by the District. Under Health and Safety Code Section 4730, the governing body of the District would be made up of one representative for every existing member city, sanitary district, and unincorporated portion of the County within the Districts' service area and now represented on one or more of the existing nine Districts. Board membership would decrease from 29 to 24 with the loss of double representation for the Cities of Huntington Beach, Newport Beach, and Yorba Linda and the County of Orange and removal of the Irvine Ranch Water District as an eligible water district. Exhibit No. 8 of the Final Report fists the membership. Utilizing Section 4730.1 of the Health and Safety Code would produce a larger governing body for the newly consolidated District. Water districts that are engaged in wastewater service within the District's service area would be included, namely: Irvine Ranch, Los Alamitos, and Yorba Linda. Additionally, the Cities of Costa Mesa, Garden Grove and Westminster would have membership, together with the Costa Mesa Sanitary District, Garden Grove Sanitary District and Midway City Sanitary District, notwithstanding that these three cities do not provide any wastewater service. Thus the total Board membership would be 30. Please refer to Exhibit No. 9 of the Final Report. E. Recommendations The principal recommendations are: 1. The Districts should consolidate pursuant to the California Health and Safety Code Section 4730.1. This would result in representation of three water districts that are engaged in wastewater services, in addition to 23 cities,three(3) sanitary districts, and the County of Orange, making a total of 30 members to the consolidated District's Board of Directors. 2. The Districts should consolidate with the inclusion of District No. 14, and reaffirm the continuation of agreements between the predecessor eight Districts and District No, 14, 3. The consolidated District should establish special zones as authorized by Section 4850 et. seq. of the Health and Safety Code to maintain current customer rate structures and for the continuation of differential user rates; and for retirement of outstanding debt previously assumed by each predecessor District. 4. The Districts should adopt the Fiscal Year 1996-97 Operating and Capital Budgets as the plan of services for the consolidated District. The following sections of the Executive Summary provide the basis for the above recommendations. Preliminary discussions with the LAFCO staff have received their support for the formation of special zones within the proposed consolidated District to continue the differentiation of sanitary sewer service charges and the repayment of existing outstanding debt. Consequently, there is no anticipated opposition to a consolidation proposal that would keep in place current Districts' practices regarding revenue collection and allocation of those revenues to benefiting areas as appropriate. The County Sanitation District of Omage County,Executive Summary Page iu Prepared by Ford Sauvajot Management Group,Inc. 6/17/96 F. Existina Conditions Organization and Function The Districts are made up of nine separate public agencies. Each District is a political subdivision of the State of California and is governed by a representative of each city and sanitary district within the district and a member of the Orange County Board of Supervisors. Each district has its own budget. All districts except District Nos. 13 and 14 have their own tax rate and trunk sewer systems. District No. 13 buys capacity in the other districts' transmission facilities. The Boards of Directors meet in Joint Session on the fourth Wednesday of every month to conduct business of their districts and the joint districts. During the formation of the Districts in 1947 and 1948, it was decided that individual districts would not act independently with respect to treatment and disposal. Consequently, a Joint Administrative Organization was formed to administer the business of the jointly owned treatment and disposal facilities and the activities common to all districts in an effective and economical manner. This is provided for in the Joint Ownership Operation and Construction Agreement. The day-to-day operation of the organization is under the direction of a General Manager, two assistant general managers, seven department heads, and an authorized staff of 673 for the current fiscal year. The Districts are a single-purpose public entity formed solely for the processing and disposal of wastewater and its residuals and serve the wastewater collection, treatment and disposal needs of approximately 2.2 million people. During 1994-1995, an average daily sewage influent flow of 244 million gallons per day(MGD)was treated and 510 wet tons per day of residual solids (biosohds) was produced. The districts encompass a 470 square-mile area of Orange County that includes 23 of the County's 31 cities. Description of Joint Works Facilities The Districts are co-participants in an agreement dated March 10, 1971, as amended July 1, 1985, which provides for the joint construction, ownership and operation of the treatment plants, sewer trunks, equipment and other assets. They maintain and operate a large system of trunk sewers, pumping stations, and two modem treatment plants that process an average of more than 235 million gallons of wastewater per day. The Districts operate the third largest wastewater management agency on the West Coast. The Districts serve a population of approximately 2.2 million people with collection, treatment and disposal facilities worth more than one billion dollars. The Joint Facilities consist of nine individual districts, which own about 650 miles of major trunk sewers, 26 pumping stations and two major treatment plants with disposal facilities to safely discharge the treated effluent through an ocean outf d! into deep ocean waters. Reclamation Plant No. 1 is located in Fountain Valley about four miles from the coast adjacent to the Santa Ana River at the 405 Freeway. It has a current operational primary The County Sanitation Disuict of Orange County,Executive Summary Page iv Prepared by Ford Sauvajot Management Group,Inc. 6tl7/96 treatment capacity, including standby, of 108 MGD. Reclamation Plant No. 1 has a secondary treatment capacity of 66 MGD. Treatment Plant No. 2 is located 1,500 feet from the ocean at the mouth of the Santa Ana River on Brookhurst Street in Huntington Beach. It has a primary treatment capacity, including standby, of 286 MGD. Plant No. 2 provides advanced primary treatment to all of the wastewater that enters the plant and secondary treatment to up to 75 MGD of the total flow. The two treatment plants have a primary treatment capacity of 394 MGD. Daily flow presently averages approximately 237 MGD compared to the 242 MGD as of 6/30/95 as shown in Table 1 below. The 1989 Master Plan identified projects designed to meet projected wastewater treatment needs until the year 2020. The 1989 Master Plan estimated that by 1994,the total projected average daily flow rate at both plants would be 290 MGD, and by 2001, 322 MGD. However, the continuing effects of the drought of the 1980's and 1990's, the economic recession in California, and the implementation of water conservation programs throughout the Districts' service area have had a significant impact on earlier estimates. Current estimates for the year 2001 are 280 MGD. (See Section 3.1 of the Final Report.) Table 1 Joint Works Facilities As of June 30, 1995 Total Population Served (estimated) 2,275,000 Service Area(estimated) 440 square miles Total Number of Cities Served 23 Total Miles of Trunk Sewers 650 Number of Pumping Stations 26 Number of Treatment Plants Reclamation Plant No. I Rated Capacity 108 MGD Treatment Plant No. 2 Rated Capacity 286 MGD Total Rated Capacity 394 MGD Reported Average Daily Flow Reclamation Plant No. 1 84 MGD Treatment Plant No. 2 158 MGD Total Average Daily Flow 242 MGD Description of Sanitary Sewer System The Districts act as`Wholesalers,"receiving wastewater from the collection systems of the various cities, water districts and local sewer agencies. They do not deal directly with individuals except for portions of District No. 7 which are located primarily in unincorporated territory of the County. District No. 7 provides`retail service"as well as "Wholesale service." The County Sanitation District of Orange Comity,Executive Summary Page v Prepared by Ford Sauvajot Management Group,Inc. 6/17/96 Assets of the Districts may be for individual District assets or their respective share of joint assets. The following table summarizes the respective District ownership in jointly owned and separately owned property, plant, equipment and construction in progress, at cost, as of June 30, 1995: Jointly Owned Separately Owned Total Total property, plant, and equipment 5742,677,706 $304,190,579 $1,046,868,285 Less accumulated depreciation $282.776.401 Net property, plant and equipment $764.091.RR4 Consolidation of the Districts into a single County Sanitation District would eliminate the `jointly owned" and "separately owned" status of these fixed assets. The new County Sanitation District would be the successor owner of these assets. There is no anticipated impact of this change in ownership status on the number and type of facilities required to operate and maintain the existing sewer system. Consolidation would not require any exchange or payment to the existing nine Districts for the transfer of property and other assets to the newly formed County Sanitation District. Relationship of the Joint Works Operations to Districts The Districts utilize joint operating, working capital and capital outlay accounts to pay joint operating and construction costs. These costs are subsequently allocated to the Districts based on gallons of sewage flow. Each District is charged its proportion of the necessary expenses equal to the proportion of the annual gallonage flows from each District to the total annual gallonage flows from all Districts. The cost of new construction of plant and other necessary facilities is also similarly allocated to each District. The percentage of each District's ownership in jointly owned plant and facilities is annually calculated according to the mathematical average of sewage flows for the three years immediately preceding the first day of July of each year for each District to the total three year average for all the Districts. This percentage is applied against the total capital investment in the Joint Facilities and establishes the ownership equity required by each respective District. District No. 14 has a special calculated annual flow equal to three times the four highest months' flow beginning in Fiscal Year 1995-96. The Districts rely on a joint staff for administration and operation and maintenance. Each year, Districts' staff prepare annual operating plans for each District. These annual operating plans or budgets, are adopted by the respective Boards of Directors, and are used to serve as the basis for monitoring financial matters, estimating the levy and collection of taxes and determining future service charge rates. The Comfy Sanitation District of Orange Comm.Exmutivc Summary page vt prepared by Ford Sauvajot Management Group.Inc. 6117/96 Budget The Fiscal Year 1995-96 Joint Operating budget is $54.38 million as shown in Tables 2 and 3. This finances the operating and maintenance cost of the joint treatment works and the joint administrative activities. These consist of the cost to operate, maintain and manage the two treatment plants. All of the personnel costs for all of the Districts are initially recorded in the Joint Operating Fund and either allocated or charged to the proper funds for the work being done through a job cost system. Consolidation of the Districts would simplify some of the accounting requirements by having only one budget for the proposed new Sanitation District compared to nine District budgets and the Joint Operating Budget. Table 2 Joint Operating Budeet 1994-95 1995-% Description Budget Budget 1. Net SalariesWages&Benefits $26 818 000 28,667,000 2. Odor Control&Chemical Coagulants 3,725,000 5,363,500 3. Contractual Services 6,825,000 7 500 4. Professional Services 1,154 000 1,512,600 5. Repair&Maintenance 3,675,000 4,209,900 Materials& Services 6. Research& Monitoring 3,050,000 3,095,000 7. Utilities 3,915 000 3,375,500 8. Other Materials, Supplies, Outside Servic Equipment,&Offsets 4 080 000 4 68 0000 Total Joint Operating Expenses $53,242,000 $58 180,000 Revenues and Offsets 3 700 000 3.800A00 Net Joint Operating $49.542.000 $54.380.000 Budget to Treat 1 Million Gallons $578 $628 The County Sanitation District of Orange County,Executive Summary Page vu Prepared by Ford Sa rvajot Management Group,Inc. 6/17/96 Table 3 All Districts' Operating Fund Budgets 1994-95 1995-96 Budget Budget Ooeratine Directors'Fees $128,500 $155,500 Share of Joint Operating 49,542,000 54,380,000 Contractual Services 8,308,000 8,410,500 Utilities 666,000 676,000 Sanitary Sewer Service Charge Expense 192,000 119,000 Professional Services 148,000 178,000 Printing and Publication 16,500 11,500 Travel &Meeting- Directors Mileage 12,000 11,500 Uncwllectible Accounts 9,000 30,000 Total Operating $59,022,000 $63,972,000 Non-Operating Certificate of Participation 5,264,000 3,685,000 Service/Transfer Interest 0 0 Expenses Applicable to Prior Years 12,000 0 Total Non-Operating $5,276,000 $3,685,000 Total Operating & Non-Operating $64,298,000 $67,657,000 Reserves Portion of Self-insurance 157,692,000 88,130,000 Reserve Appropriation for 11,806,000 12,795,000 Contingencies Dry Period Reserve 31,234,000 31,000,000 Total Reserves 5200,732,000 $131,925,000 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS $265A30.000 $199582.000 Sanitary Sewer Service Charges and Other Sources of Operating Revenues The Districts' operating revenues are principally derived from sanitary sewer service charges and interest earnings on invested funds. Each of the Districts operates as an The County Sanitation District of Orange County,Executive Summary Page viu Prepared by Ford Sarmijot Management Gmup,Inc. 6/17/96 enterprise activity. Enterprise funds account for operations that are financed and operated in a manner similar to private business enterprises, where the intent of the Board of Directors is that costs (expenses, including depreciation and amortization) of providing services to the general public on a continuing basis be financed primarily through sanitary sewer service charges. Table 4 below summarizes the operating revenues budgeted for Fiscal Year 1995-96 and 1994-95. Table 4 All Districts' Operating Fund Revenues Revenues 1994-1995 1"5-1996 Industrial/Commercial User Fees S8,430,000 $7,960,000 Sanitary Sewer Service Charges 61,239,000 6Z151,000 Interest&Misc. Receipts 15,772,000 6,197,000 Transfers From Other Funds 0 1,500,000 Total Revenues $85,441,000 $77,808,000 Other Available Funding Cash& Investments - 179,589,000 121,774,000 Total Available Funding S265,030,000 S199,582,000 The sanitary sewer service charges were effective July 1, 1992, and have not been increased since that time and remain at the same level for Fiscal Year 1995-96. District No. 14 is funded by the Irvine Ranch Water District. The average annual fee for a single family residential dwelling unit (D.U.) is $71.69. This compares very favorably with a survey conducted by the Management Consulting division of the firm Black & Veatch which reported an average California 1994 rate per D.U. of$184.80. Source Control User Fees Large industrial, commercial and other institutional users are subject to source control user fees which are calculated separately to recover the difference between actual cost of service and other funds collected on the tax bill. These fees are collected quarterly by direct billing and average about $933 per million gallons. In those cases, credit is given for the emus] sanitary sewer use fee and property taxes paid. Establishment of Special Zones Consolidation of the Districts would provide for the establishment of special zones pursuant to Section 4850 at. seq. of the California Health and Safety Code. Under the referenced Section, the consolidated District would establish zones by resolution of the Board of Directors to differentiate and account for costs, revenues and liabilities of the existing Districts. Such zones would have boundaries the same as those of each The County Sanitation District of Orange County.Executive Summary Page in Prepared by Ford Sauvajot Management Group. Inc. 6/17/% predecessor District. In addition, an Improvement District (ID) would be formed compatible with each existing District's service area to enable proper segregated accounting for the retirement of the existing Certificates of Participation(COPs) debt. In this manner, therefore, each zone would continue to be responsible for only their project. As new future borrowing is implemented, new ID's would be formed to include the service area benefiting from the projects. Such new ID's would not necessarily have boundaries congruent with the zones. For projects at the treatment plants, however, an ID to include all of the existing service areas would be formed to properly allocate the cost of such improvements that would be used by all the zones. Capital Program-Joint Works Facilities and All Districts The Districts make all capital improvement expenditures in accordance with an adopted and funded Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The Districts develop an annual five-year plan for capital improvements, including design, development, and implementation costs. Table 5 depicts Fiscal Year 1995-96 CIP funding for Joint Works Facilities. Table 5 1995-96 CEP Fundin¢-Joint Works Facilities Additional Improved Replacement/ Item Capacity Treatment Rehabilitation Total Prunary Treatment $1,000,000 $150,000 $1,350,000 $2,500,000 Secondary Treatment $5,325,000 $2,600,000 $25,000 $7,950,000 Solids Digestion — — $250,000 $250,000 Electrical Power Systems $200,000 S925,000 S825,000 SI,950,000 Safety lmprovemems — $1,350,000 $3,575,000 $4,925,000 Miscellaneous Projects $325,000 S870,000 $2,085,000 $3,280.000 Ocean Outfall Systems $300,000 — $1,285,000 S1,585,000 Studies and Research S130,000 $450,000 $60,000 $640,000 Support Facilities S350,000 $160,000 $3,325,000 $3,835,000 Intorrretion Management Services $150,000 $1,495,000 $1,970,000 $3,615.000 Equipneta $900,000 $1,500,000 S600,000 $3,000,000 Total Ssfiso,tao $9,500,000 SI5,350,000 $33,530,000 Please refer to Exhibit 3 of the Final Report for a detailed listing of all capital improvement projects covering the period of Fiscal Year 1995-96 to Fiscal Year 2000-05; and also to Exhibit 4 of the Final Report which graphically depicts the total Joint Works Facilities capital improvement expenditures for Fiscal Year 1995-96. In addition to the Joint Works Facilities capital improvements,the Districts fund a number of projects to maintain the sewer collection system. These projects are depicted in Exhibit 5 of the Final Report. Fiscal Year 1995-96 projects are summarized in Table 7. The County Sanitation District of Change County,Executive Summary Page x Prepared by Ford Sauvajot Management Group,Inc. 6/17/96 Table 6 Annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charges All Districts Effective 7-1-92 ROD 109 210 309 516 609 725 1108 1303 Nos. 121 216 319 528 622 729 Ills 1310 Class of User Basis of District District District District District District District District Charge No. 1 No.2 No. 3 No.5 No.6 No. 7 No. it No. 13 Single Fam/ Charge per $83.24 $71.52 $73.89 $96.75 $76.47 $50.09 $60.00 $100.00 Condominiums D.U. Multi-Faro/Mobile Charge per 49.94 42.91 44.33 58.05 45.88 30.05 36.00 60.00 D.U. Commercial/Industrial/ Charge per 59.52 51.14 52.83 69.18 54.68 35.81 42.90 71.50 Other (gov't, Utilities, 1,000 sq. R. Non-profit of building Organizations,etc.) District No. 14 is funded by the Irvine Ranch Water District. The County Sanitation District of Orange County,Executive Summary Page A Prepared by Ford Sauvajol Management Group,Inc. 6117/96 Table 7 Summary of Budeeted Capital Expenditures-All Districts 1996-96 1994-95 Project Expenditures Bud a Budge District Pump Station Projects $1,315,000 $5,018,000 District Sewer/Interceptor Projects 11,625,000 12,881,000 District Misc. Projects 480,000 851.000 Joint Works Equity Purchase 8,203,000 8,947,000 Transfer to Other Funds 1,500,000 0 Reimbursement Agreements 109,000 109.000 Total Projects $23,232,000 $27,806,000 Capital Reserves Share of Capital Reserve $50,000,000 $100,000.000 Share of Environmental Reserve 5,001,000 10,000,000 Earthquake/Flood/insumnce Reserve 87,270.000 139,115,000 Total Capital Reserves $142,271,000 $249.115,000 Table 8 summarizes the source of funding for the Capital Improvements Program. Table 8 Potential Sources of Funding for Capital Improvements Program Ad Valorem Taxes User Fees Connection Fees Industrial Waster User Fees Sale of Capacity Rights/Property Redevelopment Agency Pass-through Agreements Subventions Interest and Miscellaneous Receipts All Districts, with the exception of Districts No. 13 and 14, receive property tax. The total property tax revenue projected for Fiscal Year 1995-96 is $31,162,000 and is about 6.7% of the total funding sources for the Districts. Consolidation would not jeopardize the continued levy of property taxes. It should be noted, however, that the Districts, beginning with Fiscal Year 1993-94, have allocated the entire property tax revenue to the retirement of long-term debt. Recent reductions in property tax, therefore, increase the potential for increases in sanitary sewer service charges. The County Smitadon Durtnct of Orange County,Exeamvc Summary Page rdi Prepared by Ford Sauvajot Maoagcrnent Group,Inc. 6117196 Long Term Debt As of June 30, 1995, the Districts had a number of debt issues outstanding. These issues include $408,210,000 of certificates of participation (COP) and $75,000 of general obligation (G.O.) bonds. The Districts have maintained their AA- rating from Standard and Poor's Corporation and Aa rating from Moody's Investor Services, although all COP issues are backed by issuance of letters of credit and are rated AAA. In January of 1995,the Districts retired$50 million of taxable commercial paper debt. No new debt was issued in Fiscal Year 1994-95 and no debt issuances are contemplated for Fiscal Year 1995-96. The Fiscal Year 1995-96 Budget provides for $34,602,000 to service the debt on various COPS issued since 1990. In addition, there is a $15,000 annual payment to maturity in January 1999 for the G.O. bonds in District No. 11. Reserves The Districts have reserves distributed in various accounts. Table 9 identifies the type of reserve and the amount budgeted for Fiscal Year 1995-96. Table 9 District Reserves Fiscal Year 1995-96 Budget Operating Reserves Catastrophe Reserve $88,130,000 Contingencies 12,795,000 Dry Period 31,000,000 Total $131,925,000 Capital Reserves(Non-Operating) Capital $50,000,000 Environmental 5,001,000 Catastrophe Reserve 87,270,000 Total $142,271,000 Debt Service Reserves Debt Service $32,982,000 Master Plan Projects 8,971,000 Total $41,953,000 On January 10, 1996, the Districts' Treasurer reported that all Investment Policy requirements adopted by the Joint Boards on May 24, 1995 were complied with and The County Sanitation Distna or Orange Comty,Exmmive Summary Page)dii Prepared by Ford Sauvajot Management Gmup,Inc. 6/17/96 investment performance to date exceeded the index rates. Table 10 was reconstructed from the Treasurer's report and depicts the District's current investments. Table 10 Investment Summary Balances Investments Nov.30, 1995 State of California LAIF $11,443,353 Bank of America 241,095 Short-term Portfolio 60,356,395 Long-term Portfolio 234,421,057 District 1 I G.O. Bond Fund 11,886 Debt Service Reserve(Trustees) 33,883,435 Total $340,357,221 Financial Obligations The Districts have booked, as of June 30, 1995, over $2.5 million in compensated absences potential liabilities. In addition, there are claims and judgments payable amounting to$541,000. Districts' funds are adequate to cover these obligations. Consolidation of the Districts will have no impact on the liabilities of the Districts. Under consolidation into a single County Sanitation District, Government Code 57502 (see Section M of the Final Report) the new County Sanitation District assumes all predecessor District obligations. This is not an issue as the Districts are presently joined by agreement to manage and fund liabilities. Regional Participation The individual Districts and the Districts functioning as a Joint Operation have gained the admiration of other wastewater agencies for then regional initiatives and cooperatively constructed public works. The Districts participate in a wide variety of regional efforts, which include cooperative agreements with the cities that are within the Districts' service area. None of these agreements would be adversely affected by consolidation of the Districts. Water Reclamation The Districts have been concerned with the need for water conservation and reclamation. In response to projections of future droughts and water shortages, CSDOC, and Orange County Water District (OCWD) have been evaluating alternatives for increasing local water supplies. Mstorically, these two agencies have had a successful relationship in developing reclaimed water. This is evidenced with the operation of Water Factory 21 and the Green Acres Project. The County Sanitation District of Orange County,Exe utivc Summary Page xiv Prepared by Ford Sauvajot Management Group, Inc. 6/17/96 Water Conservation The Districts have participated with local water agencies and cities in water conservation programs. These cooperative efforts include a multiphased water conservation program designed to be implemented in various stages. The Districts actively foster and promote water conservation to reduce sewage flows by implementing water conservation programs that emphasize permanent behavioral changes and permanent hardware changes. The Districts have also developed cooperative agreements with other public agencies to provide education, encourage community use of water-saving devices, amend plumbing codes, and other beneficial measures to reduce water usage. CONSOLIDATION OF DISTRICTS A. Benefits Expected from Consolidation As was noted earlier in this report, the Districts have joined together ever since the original Districts assumed the responsibilities of the Joint Outfall Sewer Organization (JOS)and later combined their efforts in the Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement (Agreement). As a result, many of the benefits to be obtained from maintaining a centralized and joint administrative and operational structure were achieved over the past decades. Consolidation of the Districts, therefore, is the final phase of a process that began from the outset. Service Area Considerable attention is given at this time to the reduction in the number of governmental agencies with specific interest in limiting the number of specific purpose agencies, such as the Districts. This attention sometimes becomes overly concerned with cutting down agency numbers and fails to recognize the logical arrangements that consolidation should bring. One such concern is the combination that results in an appropriate service area with logical characteristics that bring benefits to the customers. The formation of the Districts was not accidental and considered a wide range of factors. The areas served by the nine Districts are contiguous and in many cases share common facilities. All of the nine Districts are members of an agreement which owns and operates two sewage wastewater treatment plants and a common ocean disposal system, all operated by one staff. The Districts include about ninety-percent of the population of Orange County and about two-thirds of the land mass,generally the area north of the City of Lake Forest. The area south of this boundary, i.e., the City of Lake Forest and other cities south of the City of Irvine, are generally referred to as the south county. The south county, which includes about one-third of Orange County's land mass and about ten percent of the population, is served by several wastewater collection and treatment agencies and two regional agencies, the Southeast Regional Reclamation Authority (SERRA) and the Aliso Water Management Agency (AWMA). To the greatest extent, The County Sanitation District of Orange County,Er tivc Summary Page" Prepared by Ford Sat majot Management Group,Inc. 6/17/96 the wastewater collection treatment and disposal agencies within Orange County follow drainage boundaries;to a lesser extents, the agencies follow existing political boundaries. The service area for the nine Districts, including the twenty-three northerly cities in the County of Orange are generally tributary to one or both of the Districts' two wastewater treatment plants. That means that the great majority of the wastewater collected for treatment and disposal, about ninety percent of the water, does not have to be pumped to the sewage treatment plants. While the Districts operate twenty-six pumping stations collectively,they pump less than ten percent of the water within the service boundary area. (One reason for this high gravity flow percentage is that most wastewater collected in District No. 14 is reclaimed by IRWD, otherwise it too would be pumped to the Districts' treatment facilities.) Financial Benefits It is widely known that the cost of borrowing for the financing of essential infrastructure is affected by the credit worthiness of the issue. When several districts combine to issue long-terra debt, credit rating agencies are greatly influenced by the so-called `weakest link" In other words, the district which rates lowest in credit worthiness sets the credit rating level for the entire issue. While this may result in only a few basis points of additional interest costs, the long-term effect can be several hundreds of thousands of dollars over the life of the issue. For example, the difference between an interest cost of 4.50% reduced to 4.25% for an issue of$25,000,000 over 20 years can save rate payers between$420,000 to $780,000, depending on the debt structure. In the past, the Districts have backed their COP issues with letters of credit resulting in AAA ratings. Consolidation may provide an opportunity to evaluate the need for letters of credit for future debt issuances or to obtain such letters at a low cost. Service Standards The Districts have placed a high premium on training personnel and the management of human resources. The Fiscal Year 1995-96 budget includes a reorganization establishing a Training, Safety and Emergency Response Division within Human Resources. A high level of personnel skills is maintained through consolidation as the overall workforce size allows for adequate cross-tra nhig, sufficient organizational depth for back-up, and appropriate job ladders to ensure that jobs are properly matched to the requisite skill levels resulting in a cost-effective workforce distribution. The consolidated District will enhance the already existing integration of wastewater collection systems and the treatment of the wastewater in the Districts' facilities. Consolidation will secure that integration and eliminate the risk that an individual District might withdraw from participation in the Joint Agreement. Such a withdrawal, while unlikely, could reduce the overall efficiency of the remaining Districts. Such an eventuality, however remote, will be eliminated. The County Sanitation District of Orange County,Executive Summary Page xvi Prepared by Ford Sauvajot Management Group,Inc. 6/17/96 The consolidation of the Districts into a single entity will provide greater confidence and security, to the rate payers regarding the completion of major undertakings of the region's wastewater collection and treatment system. The public's perception in the effectiveness of the system will be augmented by the formation of a single governing Board. While the Districts have gained the respect and admiration of other units of local government for their efficient operation, the governance structure is awkward. Consolidation will streamline the decision-making process and remove cumbersome legislative procedures. B. Proposed Consolidation Description Governance and Organization The Districts would be consolidated pursuant to California Government Code Section 56839 (a) pertaining to the consolidation or reorganization of districts. The new single unit of government would be a County Sanitation District organized pursuant to California Health and Safety Code Sections 4700 through 4857. The organization and govemance of the new District would remain essentially the same as that of the existing Joint Boards of Directors of CSDOC. This would result in a new Board of Directors consisting of 24 or 30 members, depending on the choice made for the Board of Directors' composition. Exhibits No. 8 and No. 9 of the Final Report depict the Director memberships and agencies represented. The CSDOC administrative and operating staff budgeted for Fiscal Year 1995-96 under the direction of the General Manager would become the administrative and operating staff of the newly formed District. The consolidation would result in the cessation of ownership and operation of individual District sanitary sewer collection systems. Similarly, there would no longer be separate District ownership and operation of the joint treatment and disposal works. All facilities, sanitary sewer collection systems and Joint Works Facilities would be united into a single wastewater collection and treatment system. Since the existing individual District wastewater collection systems are presently operated and maintained by CSDOC staff as part of the overall wastewater collection and treatment system servicing the territory covered by the nine Districts, there will be no change from the existing operating plan. Service Area The service area of the consolidated District will be the same as that served by the existing nine Districts, or approximately 440 square miles. The service area map is provided as Exhibit 10 in the Final Report. Wastewater flows are estimated at approximately 242 MGD (as of 6130/95). The total population served would be approximately 2.2 million which would encompass 23 cities in Orange County. The County Sanitation District of Orange County,Executive Summary Page xvu Prepared by Ford Sauvajot Management Group, Inc. 6/17/96 Customer Base Orange County population has been steadily growing in past decades and is projected to continue expanding into the future. The population of the consolidated District's service area is projected to grow to 2.7 million by the year 2020. Table 10 shows this projection: Table 10 Service Area Population Forecast 1990 2000 2010 2020 2,075,000 2,330,000 2,490,000 2,672,000 (Source:CSDOC 19951 Financial Condition Proper), Taz The financial base of the consolidated District will remain strong. Assessed valuations of ' taxable property have continued to increase. In Fiscal Year 1985-86 it was $66,983,000,000 compared to $127,396,000,000 for Fiscal Year 1994-95, an increase of - over 90'/a, or about 100/u per year. Recent increases have been lower. Property taxes will be collected by the consolidated District in areas previously served by Districts in which such tax was previously levied. The amount collected will be applied to debt service, as is presently the policy of the Districts. Property tax revenues are expected to be no less than the present level of$31 million, or about 6.7%of total revenues. Reserves The reserves set aside by the District would become the consolidated District's reserves with the exception of those of District No. 14. Under consolidation, District No. 14 would become a special zone within the consolidated District. Its reserves would be subject to an agreement negotiated in 1995 between the 8 predecessor Districts and District No. 14, providing for IRWD to retain their control. The comprehensive policy regarding reserves would be adopted by the consolidated District. Adequate reserves have been budgeted in Fiscal Year 1995-96 and would continue to be in future years in keeping with the reserve policy. Please refer to Section 3.L of the Final Report. Insurance The consolidated District would continue to be self-insured (as the Districts now are) for workers' compensation, property damage and general liability. The self-insurance portion of workers' compensation would be $250,000 per person per occurrence with outside excess Insurance coverage to the statutory limit. The self-insured portion for property damage covering fire, flood, and other perils would be $25,000 per occurrence with outside excess insurance coverage to $200 million for flood, fire and other perils. The self-insured portion for property damage covering earthquakes would be $250,000 or 5% The County Sanitation District of Orange County,Executive Summary page xvtii Prepared by Ford Sauvajot Management Group,Inc. 6/17/96 per unit of insurance,whichever is greater, with outside insurance coverage to$30 million. The District would maintain outside comprehensive boiler and machinery insurance with a $100 million per occurrence combined limit with deductibles ranging from $25,000 to $100,000. The District would also be completely self-insured for general liability coverage. Insurance coverages would be reviewed and determined by the Board of Directors annually and would be subject to change. Liabilities There are no unrecorded claims as of June 30, 1995 against the Districts that would materially affect the financial position of the new consolidated District. Facilities,Fixed and Other Assets Consolidation would result in all assets of existing Districts to be transferred at book value, less accumulated depreciation, to the new consolidated District. The current net valuation of these assets is $764,091,884 (as of June 30, 1995). Under the proposed consolidation, all predecessor District obligations and rights would remain in force. Budget The Districts' Fiscal Year 1996-97 approved operating and capital budgets would become the consolidated District's operating financial plan and plan of services for Fiscal Year 1996-97. It contains, among other financial objectives,the fiscal policies and programmed activities that would be adopted by the new District. In addition to the details of the operating budget, it contains the Capital Improvement Program with projected expenditures for capital construction, reserve requirements, bond interest and principal redemption requirements,and other items of fiscal iimportance. Exhibit 11 of the Final Report is the existing "All Districts Summary" for the Operating Fund, Capital Facilities Fund, Construction/COP Fund and G.O. Bond and Interest Fund, as of June 30, 1995. Capital Program The Districts' Joint Works Capital Improvements budget has been prepared under assumptions included in the 30-year Facilities and Expansion Master Plan ("2020 Vision" approved by the Joint Boards of Directors in 1989). It will continue to provide the basis for capital improvements planning and construction for the consolidated District until such time as strategic planning products modify the 1989 Master Plan. A strategy plan is under preparation. Long Term Indebtedness The outstanding long-term debt of the Districts will not be assumed by the consolidated District. Exhibit 6 details the Districts' long-term indebtedness. The County Sanitation District of Orange County,Executive Summary Page six Pmpared by Ford Sauvalot Management Group,Inc. 6/17/96 It is the intention of the Districts to establish special zones upon consolidation to continue differential user fees and to ensure that Districts' outstanding debt is serviced by only those residents who originally assumed that debt. The boundaries of each zone will be the same as those of each predecessor District, The new consolidated District will establish nine(9)zones to differentiate and account for costs, revenues and liabilities of the existing Districts. Such zones would have boundaries the same as those of each predecessor District. In addition, an Improvement District (ID)would be formed coincident with each existing District's service area to enable proper segregated accounting for the retirement of the existing Certificates of Participation (COPS) debt. In this manner, therefore, each zone would continue to be responsible for only thew project. As new future borrowing is implemented, new ID's would be formed to include the service area benefiting from the projects. Such new ID's would not necessarily have boundaries congruent with the zones. For projects at the treatment plants, however, an ID to include all of the existing service areas would be formed to properly allocate the cost of such improvements that would be used by all the zones. It is also expected that the consolidated District would continue the practice of dedicating Ad Valorem Taxes where it would be collectable within a zone to the retirement of long-term debt of an appropriate ID. ' C. Proposed Plan of Services Under consolidation the operation of the new District would remain the same as the current operations of CSDOC. The principal reason is that the Districts presently operate in a consolidated fashion pursuant to the provisions in the Health and Safety Code Section 4840 at seq. The consolidated District would carry out its function through the existing Joint Operation departments. The principal functional units and Fiscal Year 1995-96 expenditures budgeted as follows: Fiscal Year 1995-% General Manager's Department $1,638,400 Human Resources Department 1,423,000 Finance Department 3,352,300 Information Technology Department 1,551,600 Maintenance Department 15,120,700 Operations Department 24,199,300 . Technical Services Department 10,109,800 Engineering Department 784,900 Total $58,180,000 Revenue (3,800,000) Net Operating Expenses $54,380,000 The County Sanitation District of Orange County,Executive Summary Page zx Prepared by Ford Sauvajot Management Group,Inc. 6/17/96 TIME TABLE TO IMPLEMENT CONSOLIDATION A. Implementation Approach Consolidation of the Districts is proposed to be accomplished under Government Code Section 56839(a)which states: If a majority of the members of each of the legislative bodies of two or more local agencies adopt substantially similar resolutions of application making proposals either for the consolidation of districts or for the reorganization of all or part of the districts into a single local agency, the commission [LAFC01 shall approve, or conditionally approve, the proposal The commission shall authorize the Board of Supervisors to order the consolidation or reorganization without an election, except as otherwise provided in subdivision(b) of Section 57081. Section 57801(b) states,in part: An election shall be held if the conducting authority finds either of the following: (1) In the care of inhabited territory, that a petition requesting that the proposal be submitted to confirmation by the voters has been signed by either of the following: (A)At least 15 percent of the number of landowners within the territory subject to the consolidation or reorganization who own at least 15 percent of the assessed value of land within the territory. (B)At least 15 percent of the voters entitled to vote as a result of residing within, or awning land within, the territory. The initial step for consolidation, therefore, is the preparation of a resolution by each of the Districts petitioning LAFCO for the consolidation of the nine Districts into one. In the event that there is not a unanimous agreement among the nine Districts, the organizational entity would be two or more of the Districts. B. Time Table The estimated time table to complete consolidation of the Districts is approximately the end of March, 1997. This is based on the following schedule of events and dates: February 1996 Completion of Draft Consultant Report Staff analysis regarding consolidation May 1996 Completion of Final Consultant Report Review and Discussion of Staff Consolidation by Joint Boards of Directors The County Sanitation District of Orange County,Executive Summary Page sin Ntpared by Ford Sauvajot Management Group,Inc. 6117/96 June- September 1996 Joint Boards Review of Final Consultant Report and Staff Report;Authorization to Proceed with Application to LAFCO October 1996 Each District Adopts Resolution of Intention to Consolidate ' November 1996 Filing of Application with LAFCO December-January 1997 Review of Application by LAFCO February 1997 LAFCO schedules Public Hearing March 1997 Approved Application by LAFCO ' If the Joint Bomds of Directors choose to act more mpidly,the application and review process with LAFCO could he accomplished earlier. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. Recommendation It is recommended that the nine Sanitation Districts be consolidated into a single successor County Sanitation District. This section discusses the bases for the recommendation and describes various other matters for information. B. Key Elements Concernine the Proposed Consolidation Recommendation of the formation of a County Sanitation District as the successor entity consolidating the nine Sanitation Districts retains the flexibility enjoyed by the Districts. It also provides for adequate representation on the new Board of Directors for the rate payers. The Districts have worked well under a County Sanitation District organization forth for many years and are accustomed to operating within the broad authority available under the statutes. Consolidation of the nine Sanitation Districts into one successor County Sanitation District would continue current practice of revenue collection and maintain, without any changes, the relationships and legal obligations regarding the predecessor eight Sanitation Districts and Sanitation District No. 14. This would be accomplished by the establishment of special zones within the successor Sanitation District to reflect the continuation of differential user rates and the collection and use of property taxes. The statutes under which the new Sanitation District would be formed allow for the establishment of special zones to provide for differential user rates and the charging of capital improvement costs only to those who benefit from those improvements. The County Sanitation District of Orange County,Executive Summary Page xxu Prepared by Ford Sauvajot Management Group, Inc. 6/17/96 As a consequence of consolidation, therefore, rate payers in each of the predecessor Sanitation Districts would not assume any existing indebtedness of other Districts and would retain their present sanitary sewer service charges. Charges would be reviewed and adopted annually by the Board of Directors and would be subject to revisions. All obligations negotiated by the Districts and District No. 14 would remain in force. Specifically, a) the same terms and conditions of the November 1995 agreement would continue after consolidation; b) zones would be formed in the new District to pay debt service for existing debt issues and property taxes would be committed to each zone as needed. Therefore, there would be no financial obligation of other predecessor Districts imposed on Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD), as District No. 14 is consolidated with the other eight; and c) IRWD reserves, which are also subject to the November 1995 Agreement, would be used only for IRWD needs. Because of the complex relationships that exist between the eight Sanitation Districts and Sanitation District No. 14, the following section is presented to clarify how those relationships would remain after consolidation. C. District No. 14 District No. 14 presents unique conditions which would be addressed at the time of consolidation. As was reported in previous sections of this report, unlike the other 8 Sanitation Districts, District No. 14's share of costs is paid by IRWD rather than directly by customers. IRWD charges its residents and other customers for the costs of District No. 14. Prior to the time that District No. 14 was formed, IRWD had executed on March 13, 1985, an agreement with the eight Sanitation Districts (not including No. 14 at the time) for providing the funding necessary for District No. 14 (under formation at the time) to acquire ownership interests in the facilities and real property of the Districts; and to fund, in the future, the proportionate share of the Districts' plus District No. 14's budget for capital expenditures and operations and maintenance costs. IRWD also agreed to convey to District No. 14 its previously acquired and owned rights to 15 MGD capacity in the Districts' ocean outfall facility. Concurrently, District No. 14 conveyed the 15 MGD capacity to the eight Sanitation Districts. The January 1, 1996 "Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Capacity Rights in Treatment, Disposal and Sewer Facilities" (Agreement) between the Districts (not including District No. 14) and the new District No. 14 provided for the Districts (not including No. 14) to convey and sell to District No. 14 a 15 MGD capacity in the Joint Works Treatment Facilities for $31,293,000. In addition, District No. 14 acquired interest in the Districts' real property in an amount valued at$4,653,000. On February 13, 1986, District No. 14 entered into an"Agreement Between Irvine Ranch Water District and County Sanitation District No. 14 Acquiring Ownership Interests, Assigning Rights and Establishing Obligations." This agreement, which pertained to IRWD's funding of District No. 14's obligations with the Districts, stipulated that in the The County Sanitation Dinner of Orange County,Executive Summary Page xxiii Prepared by Ford Sauvajot Management Group,Inc. 6/17/96 event of termination within five years of the January 1, 1986 agreement between District No. 14 and CSDOC, IRWD would be paid back for its funding of District No. 14's purchase of treatment capacity, real estate interest, and reserve fiords, i.e., $31,293,000. However, IRWD would not acquire any right or title to the Joint Works Treatment Facilities. Moreover, District No. 14 would reconvey to IRWD the 15 MGD capacity rights in CSDOC's ocean outfall facilities. This agreement no longer applies, as the time has passed for the provisions to be enacted. The January 1, 1986 Agreement has recently been amended by District No. 14 and CSDOC (November 1995)and would remain in force under consolidation. . (Please refer to Section 4.B.5 of this report.) Based on the foregoing Agreement's provisions, it is concluded that the Districts have no financial obligations to IRWD regarding any interests in treatment plant capacity and real estate purchased from the Districts by District No. 14. This conclusion is reached on the basis that District No. 14,upon consolidation with the other 8 Districts, would continue to serve the wastewater collection and treatment needs of IRWD unchanged from the existing condition. Further,the new consolidated District would combine all the Districts' assets, including those of District No. 14. Based on the Agreement, the time has expired during which the repurchase of real property and assets may have been of consideration. It is, therefore, feasible to consolidate District No. 14 along with the other 8 Districts. It is also noted that District No. 14 executed on February 11, 1987, a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD). The MOU provides, in part, as follows: Section 3: Fees. Charges and Invoicing Procedures. A. All sewer user rates and charges established by IRWD to be imposed within the boundaries of IRWD's service area for use of its facilities, shall be established by IRWD from time to time on its sole discretion. B. IRWD and 14 require that each discharger issued a permit (hereinafter "Permitiee')pursuant to IRWD's and 14's Ordinances, procedures and this Memorandum of Understanding, to discharge wastewater into 14's facilities, shall pay its reasonably proportionate share of all costs of provt&ng service by CSDOC. To implement this requirement, IRWD ad 14 shall each,from time to time, in the sale discretion of each ad in accordance with procedures required by Sate and Federal regulations and permits issued to CSDOC and IRWD pursuant thereto, adapt permit fees, sewer use rates ad charges, including fees and penalties jar non�comphance with permit conditions or its respective Ordinance, and ake the required actions to levy said fees, rates and charges on all such Permittees for the use of its facilities. C 14 shall regularly invoice IRWD jar those permit fees, sewer use charges, or non-compliance fees, all as described in Section 3B above, incurred by The County Sanitation Distna of Orange County,Executive Summary Page xxiv Prepared by Ford Sauvajot Management Gmup,Inc. 6/17/96 Perminees within 14. User charges will be assessed to IRWD on the basis of wastewater delivered by IRWD to 14 at every point of connection between IRWD and l4 facilities. IRWD shall pay said invoices in full within forty-five (45)days of the invoice dates. D. IRWD shall be responsible for promptly invoicing Permittees within 14 for the fees and charges adopted by 14 and for collecting same. E. 14 and IRWD will work together to complete the billing and collection process. Should a Permit¢Jail to pay any permit fee or non-complrance fees, IRWD will pursue collection through its routine procedures, including termination of water and/or sewer service, if appropriate, and shall notify 14 to initiate Permit revocation when necessary. It is anticipated that this MOU would form the basis for a similar protocol to be executed by IRWD and the newly consolidated District. Two factors which make District No. 14 different from other Districts are: 1. The Irvine Ranch Water District funds all of District No. 14's financial requirements with the Districts. 2. The Irvine Ranch Water District also operates a wastewater treatment plant and flows to the Districts' Joint Works Facilities are controlled by IRWD. It is not expected that consolidation would change either of those. In November 1995 the eight Sanitation Districts and District No. 14 renegotiated the "Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Capacity Rights in Treatment, Disposal and Sewer Facilities." Under the terms of the amendment to said agreement, District No. 14 would pay for its joint works capital costs based upon the actual average flow per day for the highest four months, providing capacity for higher winter flows. This amendment, in essence, brings District No. 14 more in line with the method of payment for expenses incurred by the Districts' Capital Outlay Revolving Fund (CORF) budget and Annual Integration Adjustment. For the past 10 years, (i.e., since the formation of District No. 14)District No. 14 has been paying for its share of CORF on 15 MGD flow(the amount estimated at the time of formation). Flow from District No. 14 has been substantially less overall but has ranged widely from summer to winter due to IRWD's summer diversion of reclaimed water from its plant for agricultural use. Current plans of IRWD include diverting about 5 MGD to duck ponds during the winter. This change in the method of payment makes for a more equitable calculation for IRWD's operations and maintenance costs in the Districts' facilities. The County Sanitation Disma of Orange County,Exec,,Summary Page xxv Prepared by Ford Sauvaiot Management Group, Inc. 6/17196 D. Estimated Savings Consolidation of the Districts is projected to produce annual operating savings on the order of$120,000, based on the Fiscal Year 1995-96 budget. These savings break down as follows: Administration $55,000 Legal Services 5,000 Board Costs 10,000 Accounting Costs 50 000 Estimated Total $120,000 (annualized) E. Consolidation of Districts without District No. 14 The Districts, as a matter of policy, may want to consolidate without District No. 14. Exploring this option suggests three scenarios for consolidation without District No. 14. Each of the scenarios is discussed below and assumes that the mutual benefits enumerated in 1985 accruing to the Districts and to IRWD from the formation of District No. 14 still exist today. In other words, even though the consolidation could exclude District No. 14, there would be a continued dependence by IRWD to obtain wastewater treatment and disposal from the consolidated District. Scenario Under this scenario, District No. 14 would remain as an independent County Sanitation District. To continue the present use of the Districts' facilities after their consolidation would not require renegotiating the terms of the agreements that are presently in force. Changes to those agreements would merely require the renaming of the Districts as the new consolidated District. Under consolidation, the new District is expected to honor prior agreements. The terns of the recently amended "Agreement for purchase and Sale of Capacity Rights in Treatment, Disposal and Sewer Facilities" (November 1995) would remain in force. This would secure for IRWD treatment capacity. District No. 14 would secure its facility and treatment/disposal requirements through a "service contract" with the new consolidated District. This would not be a Joint Operating Agreement (JOA). The new consolidated District, however, may not be comfortable with District No. 14 having an equity ownership share of its facilities and real property based on mutually agreed payments for those services based on wastewater flows. Therefore, revisions of the terms of current agreements between the new consolidated District and District No. 14 may be deemed advisable. Such a "service contact"would not give District No. 14 an equity ownership in the new District's facilities and real property. The present "Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Capacity Rights in Treatment, Disposal and Sewer Facilities," as amended, is somewhat unclear as to the extent of entitlement to which District No. 14 may be reimbursed for capacity ownership in the Districts' capital facilities and real property. Operating practices of the Districts and the terns negotiated to the most recent amendment to this agreement by the Districts and District No. 14 indicate that each District has an equity share in the Districts' capital The County Sammuon District of Orange County,Executive Summary Page xxvi Prepared by Ford Sunujot Management Group, Inc. 6117/96 facilities and real estate. The amendment, among other terms, provides that the proceeds from the sale of District No. 14's share of joint works capital facilities to other Districts (due to lowering District No. 14's costs based on reduced flows) will be used to satisfy reserve policy requirements of the Districts. The Districts would repurchase District No. 14's ownership interests pursuant to provisions in the current"Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement." The impact on the proposed new consolidated District, if District No. 14 were excluded, would be a reduction in the number of members to the Board of Directors (reduced by 1 director). None of the Directors of District No. 14 would serve on the newly consolidated District Board of Directors. The service area for the new District would decrease by about 92 square miles. However, services would be provided to this territory through a "service contract." Therefore, the new District's work program and budget would not be affected. There would be no impact on the proposed plan of service. Under this scenario, IRWD's service area customers are unaffected by the consolidation of the other eight Sanitation Districts. Treatment capacity and associated costs continue to be furnished and based on the existing agreements negotiated between the former eight predecessor Sanitation Districts (which under this scenario are now a single consolidated ' District) and District No. 14. Renegotiation of some of the terms of existing contracts could result in District No. 14 no longer having an equity interest in real estate and facilities owned by the consolidated District. District No. 14 would be compensated over time for currently owned assets pursuant to terms and conditions enumerated in existing agreements. LAFCO is likely to find a lack of compelling reasons to consider this scenario. Rather than streamlining decision-making and improving governance, this scenario retains governmental structures that do not bring benefits which would be unavailable under complete consolidation of the nine Districts. Scenario 1 Under the second scenario, a variation of Scenario No. 1, District No. 14 would continue to function as an independent county sanitation district. The other eight Districts would consolidate into a single District, similarly as in scenario 1 above. The newly formed District and District No. 14 would enter into a "Joint Operation Agreement" (JOA) pursuant to Section 4840 of the California Health and Safety Code. This "John Operation" would be similar to the "Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement" currently joining the existing nine Districts into a combined administrative, operation and maintenance organization. District No. 14 would remain a separate and distinct sanitation district as would also the newly consolidated District. The composition of the resulting Joint Boards of Directors would include the directors of the new District and the directors of District No. 14. Provisions contained in the present agreements between the existing eight Districts and District No. 14 would remain in force as the obligations of the eight Districts would be transferred to the new District upon consolidation. The County Sarmation District of Orange County,Exwutm Summary Page xxva Prepared by Ford Sauvajot Management Group,Inc. 6/17/96 Because District No. 14 would, concurrent with the consolidation of the eight Districts into a new single District, enter into a `Joint Operation Agreement" with the new consolidated District, there would not be any necessity for the new District to repurchase treatment capacity and real property interests from District No. 14. The impact on the proposed new consolidated District would be a reduction in the number of members to its Board of Directors (reduced by 1). None of the Directors of District No. 14 would serve on the new consolidated District's Board of Directors. However, they would serve on the`Joint Boards of Directors" as noted above. The service area of the new District would be decreased by about 92 square miles, but the area served by the JOA would be similar to the present area served by the nine Districts. There would be no change to District No. 14's territory. Services to District No. 14's territory would be provided through the"Joint Operation" agreement. There would be no change, therefore, in the proposed plan of services. Under this scenario, IRWD's service area customers are unaffected by the consolidation. In fact, it is an exact continuation of the manner in which services are currently provided through the JOA with the eight Sanitation Districts. Agreements would remain in force as they presently exist. LAFCO is likely to find this scenario also lacking in compelling reasons to support it. This scenario appears to offer no additional benefits to customers while not fidly implementing some of the principal objectives of consolidation - i.e., simplifying decision-maldng processes and administrative procedures, improving governance, etc. LAFCO may also find objectionable formation of a Joint Boards of Directors for the JOA giving disproportionate representation to District No. 14. Scenario 3 Under a third scenario, District No. 14 would be dissolved and the territory established as a special zone within IRWD. There would be no change in the boundaries of the zone from those of District No. 14. This scenario would require IRWD to enter into a "service contract" with the new consolidated District. The terms and conditions of the contract would be consistent with the existing treatment of wastewater flow Agreements from IRWD. Dissolution of District No. 14 would require the newly consolidated District to repurchase District No. 14's capacity ownership in the Joint Works Facilities and the real property interest. Dissolution could also result in the reconveying to IRWD District No. 14's previously acquired rights to 15 MGD capacity in the Districts' ocean outfall facilities. All these asset considerations, however, would be addressed in the negotiation of new "service agreements" to the mutual benefits of the newly consolidated District's and the IRWD's customers. The intent would be to continue the terms and conditions of existing agreements to all possible extents. The County Sanitation District of Orange County,Executive Summary Page xzviii Prepared by Ford Sauvajm Management Group,Inc. 6/17/96 The 'impact on the newly consolidated District would be similar to that occurring under Scenario No. I above. The District's territory would be reduced by about 92 square miles and the Board of Directors by 1 member. None of the Directors of District No. 14 would serve on the newly consolidated District Board of Directors. The budget and service level would remain the same as the effective service area would be unchanged, with a portion to be served through a contract. There would be no impact on the proposed plan of service. Under this scenario, IRWD's service area customers are unaffected by the consolidation. All existing service agreements to treat the wastewater flow from IRWD would be renegotiated to provide similar terms and conditions that presently exist. There would be a cost to the new consolidated District for the repurchase of real property and other property interests presently owned by District No. 14. Additionally, certainty of providing wastewater treatment to IRWD's in future years may be lessened. Similarly, access to the consolidated District's wastewater facilities by IRWD may be reduced. LAFCO is likely to find this scenario to be an incomplete solution to improving governance and ensuring long-term service reliability for IRWD. While it does not increase the number of policy-making bodies in the region, it has the appearance of having the potential to break down regional planning efforts and managerial controls of an important public utility. Its decision-making structure will likely complicate regional coordination. Recommendation It is recommended that the Districts consolidate with the inclusion of District No. 14. More than 10 years ago it was determined that a number of benefits would be derived from the formation of District No. 14 and its joining the then existing 8 Districts in a joint operation. Those benefits included the determination that it was in the best interest of the residents and property owners of CSDOC and District No. 14 to allow for District No. 14's participation and ownership in the joint treatment and disposal facilities of CSDOC. By such agreement, District No. 14 did not need to build a sewage treatment plant and ocean outfall. There is ample evidence that those benefits exist today. Consolidation with District No. 14 would accelerate the normalization of its relationship to the other Districts, a process which has been reinforced by the recent negotiation of District No. 14's costs on a basis more consistent with the method utilized by CSDOC for all of its other Districts. There are no advantages to be expected from the exclusion of District No. 14 from a consolidation of the Districts. In fact, there could be a need to repurchase and/or reconvey assets that may result in unnecessary expenses to rate payers. Finally, excluding District No. 14 would accomplish only a partial consolidation when existing circumstances are conducive and cost effective to accomplish a total consolidation. None of the scenarios above offer improvements over the recommended approach. Scenario 2 offers the least favorable conditions to accomplish the consolidation of the Districts. This scenario negates most of the consolidation goals relating to simplifying decision-making processes and administrative procedures, and bringing greater unity to Tbe County Sanitation Distria of Orange Counry,E=aive Summary Page xxix Prepamd by Ford Sauvajot Management Group,Inc. 6117/96 managerial control and regional planning efforts. It should be expected that LAFCO will not consider any of these options as improvements over current conditions.. F. Governance Alternatives The Joint Boards of Directors may select either Section 4730 or 4730.1 of the California Health and Safety Code to structure the Board of Directors of the newly consolidated District. The choice affects the participation of water districts which is authorized under Section 4730.1 but excluded under Section 4730. The principal act which formed the Districts is the County Sanitation District Act, California Health and Safety Code, Section 4700 et. seq. The Districts, with the exception of District No. 14, were formed pursuant to Section 4730. District No. 14 was formed pursuant to Section 4730.1 of the County Sanitation District Act. Formation pursuant to Section 4730 would result in a board of directors smaller than the existing Joint Boards of Directors (24 members). Section 4730.1 would increase the membership of the board of directors. It is estimated that 30 members would be eligible to serve because 3 water districts would have memberships on the board of directors and three additional cities(without wastewater services)would be added. There is merit in the use of Section 4730.1 to structure its new Board of Directors because of the increasing regional participation of the Districts in water reclamation and conservation. This was observed in section 3.N of this report. The long-term need for added water sources and conservation is well documented. The need for reclamation as a water source is based on a predicted increase in water demand, and the absence of future large scale, new water development projects. It is difficult to see how future southern California water needs will be met without water reclamation and conservation. The inclusion of water districts on the consolidated Board of Directors would provide perspective to wastewater treatment and use of reclaimed water for groundwater recharge, agricultural irrigation, and other beneficial purposes to reduce increasing demands on imported water. It could facilitate the sharing of capital, operations and maintenance costs between the newly consolidated District and water districts seeking to augment their water supplies through reclamation efforts. As members on the Board of Directors, representation of water districts would confirm the new consolidated District's commitment to water reclamation and regional water conservation efforts. The County Sanitation Distnia of Orange County,Executive Summary Page xxx Prepared by Ford Sauvajot Management Group, Inc. 6/17/96 G. Sanitary Sewer Service Charges and Special Zones The Districts currently charge different sewer service rates. This is largely due to several factors: • Share in construction costs based on wastewater flows; • Availability of property tax revenues; • Different property tax rates; • Different operations and maintenance expenses; and • Geography. It is the intention of the Districts to form special zones pursuant to Section 4850 et. seq. of the Health and Safety Code following consolidation of the Districts. In this manner the Districts would maintain current user rates throughout the new consolidated District to reflect differential costs of service due to local circumstances or geography. The Districts, therefore, would be consolidated and retain current customer rate structures. There would be no change from the current practices of determining sanitary sewer service charges and no potential hardship on rate payers would result from consolidation. All fees, therefore, would be reviewed annually by the Board of Directors and would be subject to revision. The Districts currently charge Class III industrial/commercial user fees ranging from $703 to $1,037 per million gallons. These industriaVcommercial user fees would remain unchanged due to consolidation, as they would be included in the separate zones. It is recommended that the consolidated District establish special zones, as authorized by Section 4850 et seq. of the Health and Safety Code. The consolidated District would describe the boundaries of each zone (a total of nine) to be that area now encompassed by each Sanitation District. Establishment of zones would allow for the continuation of differential sanitary sewer service charges and allow for the setting of rates in each zone to reflect local conditions and geography. The County Sanitation District of Orange County,Executive Summary Page xxxi Prcpmed by Ford Sauvajot Management Group, Inc. 6/17/96 1. INTRODUCTION A. Purpose of the Study and Scope of Services The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC) engaged the services of the Ford Sauvajot Management Group, Inc. (FSMG) to provide technical assistance and analysis to CSDOC for the preparation of a comprehensive report to support the consolidation into a single District the nine County Sanitation Districts which have joined together in the ownership, operation and construction of wastewater facilities known as CSDOC. The study evaluates the benefits and probable terms and conditions which would achieve the consolidation of the nine Districts into a single, integrated County Sanitation District. The study and the report are for the exclusive use of CSDOC in its determination of a proposal for district consolidation to be made to the Local Agency Formation Commission of Orange County(LAFCO). The study, accordingly, was conducted with considerations for the preparation of an application to consolidate the Districts. This report forms the basis for documenting the advantages and disadvantages of consolidating the Districts. FSMG consultants worked closely with the staff of CSDOC to produce a fair and impartial analysis and conclusions to assist the CSDOC Joint Boards of Directors. B. Study Limitations Historical information and financial information were obtained from sources deemed reliable. A portion of the data was obtained from interviews and discussions involving representatives of CSDOC and other public agencies. In addition, FSMG has reviewed regional economic and demographic data obtained from recognized sources capable of furnishing reliable data. C. Structure of the Report This report is organized into six chapters exclusive of an Executive Summary and Appendices. The Executive Summary highlights the major findings and conclusions of the consolidation study. It contains sufficient information to be used as a "stand alone" document for use by the general public or for an introduction to the more substantive body of the report. Each chapter is organized as a major section of the study addressing a specific set of interrelated matters or issues. Detailed information is provided in each chapter to fully support the conclusions and recommendations contained in Chapter 6. The Cowry Sanitation District of Orange County Page I Prepared By Ford Sauvajot Management Coup,Inc. 6/17/96 D. Conditions Leading To Consolidation And Historical Background The Joint Boards of Directors have, over the past years, reviewed the issue of consolidation. The 1981-82 Grand Jury issued a report recommending that the Boards consolidate the then seven Sanitation Districts into one district with Board membership based on a smaller group of elected representatives. In 1983 the Joint Boards determined that the Districts' operations were functionally consolidated and no significant overall benefit would accrue by reorganizing into a single District. Today, there is a growing public concern over the number of special districts serving the needs of California residents. This concern is directed primarily toward improving customer services which are believed achievable through the opportunities that consolidation may offer. Opportunities are believed to exist in this proposed consolidation by simplifying governance structures, easing administrative processes, streamlining decision-making procedures, and simplifying some accounting and auditing functions. The Sanitation Districts acknowledge that when they were first formed, their primary concerns were to provide modem and efficient wastewater collection and treatment to growing areas. A localized approach made sense because sewer improvement bonds and the existing agreements between neighboring cities narrowed the focus of concem. The population was much smaller and the communities were dispersed in an agricultural region. Conditions today are much different. Urban areas are contiguous, the population is large, and the Sanitation Districts' sewer system is well established. The focus of attention is on the joint works facilities and the regulatory issues surrounding them. The issues facing the Sanitation Districts now and into the future are much less local in character and more regional in nature. The Sanitation Districts Joint Boards of Directors are to be commended for their foresight in evaluating alternatives to build a more effective structure to serve their service area residents. In many respects, this decision is the beginning of the final chapter in an evolutionary consolidation process that began several years ago. The original Sanitation Districts, which were formed in 194748, banded together to finance the acquisition of the Joint Outfall Sewer's (JOS)treatment and disposal facilities along with its property and a network of trunk sewers in each of the original districts. The JOS had been previously established in the 1920's by a joint operative agreement among several Orange County cities and sanitary districts. Subsequently a Joint Administrative Organization was formed to administer the business activities of the jointly owned treatment and disposal facilities (Joint Treatment Works). E. History of the Current Proposed Consolidation At the Joint Boards meeting of January 11, 1995,the issue of consolidation was raised and staff was directed to evaluate it and report to the Executive Committee of the Joint Boards of Directors. Staff reports were presented in January, February and June 1995 outlining the major issues. Subsequently, on July 26, 1995 the Joint Boards of Directors received and filed a staff report dated July 14, 1995. The County Sanitation District of Orange County Page 2 Prepared By Ford Saunjot Maoegemeot Croup,Inc. 6/17/96 The July 14, 1995 staff report recommended, in part, "The consolidation of the nine separate districts into one single Sanitation District; with a single board of directors made up of one representative each for each city, sanitary district, water district and unincorporated portion of the county within the Sanitation Districts' service area now represented on one or more of the existing nine Sanitation Districts; and direct staff to initiate all steps necessary, including the LAFCO process, to complete a reorganization of the Sanitation District." The action of the Joint Boards of Directors on July 26, 1995 considered that consolidation of the Districts was a complex matter which needed further study. This study report is, therefore, intended to assist the Joint Boards of Directors in evaluating all appropriate courses of action. F. Process for Proposed Consolidation The Districts would be consolidated (reorganized) into a single County Sanitation District pursuant to the California principal act pertaining to County Sanitation Districts, California Health and Safety Code Section 4700, et seq. The consolidation process is subject to LAFCO approval. However, if each District approves a resolution applying for consolidation,LAFCO is obligated to approve, or conditionally approve, the proposal. The new County Sanitation District would have a single Board of Directors. The composition of the single Board of Directors for the newly consolidated District would vary depending on the section of the principal act utilized by the District. Under Health and Safety Code Section 4730, the governing body of the District would be made up of one representative for every existing member city, sanitary district, and unincorporated portion of the County within the Districts' service area and now represented on one or more of the existing nine Districts. Board membership would decrease from 29 to 24 with the loss of double representation for the Cities of Huntington Beach, Newport Beach, and Yorba Linda and the County of Orange and removal of the Irvine Ranch Water District as an eligible water district. Exhibit No. 8 lists the membership. Utilizing Section 4730.1 of the Health and Safety Code would produce a larger governing body for the newly consolidated District. Water districts that are engaged in wastewater service within the District's service area would be included, namely: Irvine Ranch, Los Alamitos, and Yorba Linda. Additionally, the Cities of Costa Mesa, Garden Grove and Westminster would have membership, together with the Costa Mesa Sanitary District, Garden Grove Sanitary District and Midway City Sanitary District, notwithstanding that these three cities do not provide any wastewater service. Thus the total Board membership would be 30. Please refer to Exhibit No. 9. The Cowry Sanitation District orQmge Comty Page 3 Prepared By Ford Saunjot h1magemwt Gmup.Inc. 6/17/96 2. DESCRIPTION OF CURRENT DISTRICTS This section describes each of the nine Districts which constitute the CSDOC. Attention is given to the Districts' territory and principal wastewater collection system facilities. The member agencies of each of the nine Districts are set forth on Exhibit No. 14. DISTRICT NO. 1 County Sanitation District No. I encompasses 18.8 square miles. It is governed by 5 Directors representing the agencies shown in Exhibit No. 12. District No. 1 is the center most District of the 7 Districts which comprised the Joint Outfall Sewer Organization (JOS). County Sanitation District No. 1 includes the City of Santa Ana, portions of Costa Mesa, Orange, Tustin, and some of the unincorporated areas of the County. The small majority of the district is drained by the 48-inch Santa Ana/Dyer Road Trunk Sewer which is served by Reclamation Plant No. 1. The southerly portion of the district is served by the 84-inch Sunflower Interceptor which is jointly owned and maintained by District Nos. 1 and 7. Flow conveyed by the Sunflower Trunk is now being treated at both plants Nos. 1 & 2. There is no annexable territory remaining within District No. 1, however, the 1989 Master Plan sets forth the need to rehabilitate the existing Santa Ana Trunk between 2001 and 2005, as well as undertake a number of manhole rehabilitation projects between 1993 and 1998. The cost of the 1989 Master Plan projects for District No. 1 is Estimated to be $7 million through the year 2020. In May 1987 the Board of Directors approved a supplementary sanitary sewer service charge, which is reevaluated annually, for the District No. 1 service area. These funds are used to maintain and/or rehabilitate and upgrade the trunk sewer system within District No. 1 and to operate and maintain Joint Works Facilities. Recently, District No. 1 built a new sewer trunk, the Memory Lane Interceptor as a cooperative project between District Nos. 1 and 2 and the Cities of Santa Ana and Orange. DISTRICT NO. 2 County Sanitation District No. 2 encompasses 106 square miles. It is governed by 12 Directors representing the agencies shown in Exhibit No. 12. District No. 2 is North of District No.l and is the Northern Center of the 7 Districts which comprised the Joint Outfall Sewer Organization(JOS). County Sanitation District No. 2 serves the Cities of Villa Park, Placentia, Yorba Linda, and portions of the Cities of Orange, Garden Grove, Anaheim, Fullerton, Brea, Santa Ana, and Fountain Valley. Potential annexations into the District No. 2 area, with the exception of the Peralta Hills community, were generally incorporated into District No. 13 when it was formed. There are two general drainage areas within the district. The westerly portion is served by the Euclid Interceptor and the Newhope-Placentia Interceptor. The sewage is treated at The Cmmty Sanitation District of Orange Cowty Page 4 Prepared By Ford Saavnja Mamganmt GraW,Inc. 6/17196 REC)amation Plant No. I. The Santa Ana Canyon drainage area, as well as the drainage tares lying east of the Santa Ana River, is served by the Santa Ana River Interceptor, the flows from which are designed and construct presently being treated at Plant No, 2. This interceptor was ed to provide 30 MOD of capacity to the Upper Basin area, (including Riverside and San Bernardino Counties) as a part of the Basin Plan to manage and Protect the groundwater in the Santa Ana Watershed area. The portion of the 1989 Master Plan for District No. 2 is essentially the same as the 1986, "Amendment No. 1 to the Consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewers for County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3 and 11, Euclid/Newhope-Placentia Drainage Area." The costs for new and refurbished facilities were updated in the 1989 Master Plan to reflect cost criteria used in the preparation of that report. The estimated cost of all 1989 Master Plan projects for District No. 2 is approximately $42 million through the year 2020. District No. 2 adopted a sanitary sewer service fee in fiscal year 1989-1990 to help provide funding for major capital improvements. DISTRICT NO.3 County Sanitation District No. 3 encompasses 102.1 square miles. It is governed by 16 Directors representing the agencies shown in Exhibit No. 12. District No. 3 is the north westerly most district of the 7 Districts which comprised the Joint Outfall Sewer Organization(JOS). County Sanitation District No. 3 serves approximately 65,000 acres in the westerly portion of Orange County. Included within its boundaries are the Cities of Seal Beach, Los Alamitos, Westminster, La Palma, Stanton, Buena Park, Cypress, La Habra, and portions of Fullerton, Anaheim, Garden Grove, Fountain Valley, Brea, Santa Ana, and Huntington Beach, as well as many unincorporated portions of the County. Due to the topography of the district, the area generally drains to Plant No. 2 for treatment and disposal. The only annexable territory remaining within the projected boundaries of this district is the U. S. Naval Weapons Station in Seal Beach. This area is presently served by the district under contract; therefore, no new facilities are envisioned should the area be annexed. District No. 3 is served by three major trunk systems: the Bushard-Magnolia system, the Miller-Holder system and the Knott Interceptor system. The major project envisioned for construction in District No. 3 is a joint project of District No. 3 and the Joint Works for construction of the 120-inch Bushard Replacement/interplant Expansion Project planned for construction between 1994- and 1996. The existing Bushard Trunk is severely deteriorating. This sewer, which runs between Ellis Avenue and Plant No. 2 is needed to accommodate tributary and interplant flow requirements. Manhole rehabilitation throughout the District No. 3 system, particularly on the Miller-Holder system, is another significant part of the District No. 3 capital improvement budget, the total of which is estimated to $61 million through the year 2020. In February 1989,the Directors approved a sanitary sewer service fee which was implemented in fiscal year 1989-90 to help provide funding for these major capital improvements. The County Sanitaaon District of Orange County Pap 5 Preparad By Ford Sauvajd Ma Wmmt Group,Inc. 6117196 DISTRICT NO. 5 County Sanitation District No. 5 encompasses 18.4 square miles. It is governed by 3 Directors representing the agencies shown in Exhibit No. 12. District No. 5 is the South Central most District of the 7 Districts which comprised the Joint Outfall Sewer Organization (JOS). County Sanitation District No. 5 serves the City of Newport Beach, areas surrounding Newport Bay and includes the 4,500 acre Crystal Cove area downcoast from the community of Corona del Mar. Much of this area is at, or near, sea level which necessitates the pumping of raw wastewater to Treatment Plant No. 2. Although there are ongoing efforts to correct the problem, the Balboa Peninsula Trunk Sewer and certain local sewer systems in this district are old and seawater infiltration continues. In July 1981, after a series of public meetings, the Board of Directors approved a sanitary sewer service charge for the District No. 5 service area These Ponds are used to repair and/or replace the deteriorating trunk sewers within District No. 5. The City of Newport Beach has also undertaken a program to repair and replace many of thew local sewers in an effort to solve the seawater infiltration problem. District No. 5 continues to provide reliability through rehabilitation of existing pumping stations and force mains. The 1989 Master Plan recommends paralleling or replacing identified deficient reaches of trunk sewers. The total estimated cost of 1989 Master Plan facilities through the year 2020 for this district is S23 million. No additional annexations, except minor boundary adjustments, are anticipated for District No. 5. DISTRICT NO. 6 County Sanitation District No. 6 encompasses 15.3 square miles. It is governed by 3 Directors representing the agencies shown in Exhibit No. 12. District No. 6 is the southwesterly-center most District of the 7 Districts which comprised the Joint Outfall Sewer Organization(JOS). County Sanitation District No. 6 serves most of the City of Costa Mesa, portions of Newport Beach, and the unincorporated territory northeast of the City of Costa Mesa Sewage from the southerly one-thud of the district flows toward Pacific Coast Ifighway where it commingles with the raw wastewater from District No. 5 and is transported to Plant No. 2 for treatment. The northerly two-thirds of the district are served by two trunk sewers which are tributary to Plant No. 1. A major relief facility, the Baker-Gisler Interceptor, was designed in 1989 and was completed last year. In addition to the gravity portion, under design and construction are the Baker Force Mains and the Baker-Gisler Siphon under the Santa Ana River to serve the expanding population in the northerly portion of the district in cooperation with District Nos. 7 and 14. Also under design to serve the district is the Fairview Relief Sewer. Other trunks serving District No. 6 will be paralleled or rehabilitated. The total estimated cost of improvements to the District No. 6 system is $10 million through the year 2020. No annexations to the service area are anticipated. In July 1983 the Board of Directors approved a sanitary sewer service charge for the District No. 6 service area. The County Sanitation Dimia of Orange Cowry Page 6 Prepared By Ford Sauvaja Mamgemmt Group,Inc. 6/17196 DISTRICT NO. 7 County Sanitation District No. 7 encompasses 34.6 square miles. It is governed by 7 Directors representing the agencies shown in Exhibit No. 12. District No. 7 is east of District No. 1 and is centrally located in relationship to the 7 Districts which comprised the Joint Outfall Sewer Organization(JOS). County Sanitation District No. 7 serves the City of Tustin and portions of the Cities of Orange, Santa Ana, Costa Mesa, Irvine and Newport Beach, as well as many unincorporated county areas. Included in the District No. 7 service area are the Irvine. Newport Beach Business Center, the U. S. Marine Corps Helicopter (Tustin) facilities, and the growing residential areas of Tustin and Orange. All of the flows are tributary to Plant No. 1, with the exception of those flows in the Sunflower Trunk Sewer system which can be treated at either plant. Requests for annexation into this district are frequent. For example, 1.28 acres of unincorporated territory was recently annexed to the District(February 7, 1996). District No. 7 has joined with District Nos. 6 and 14 in implementing joint facilities to handle flow from the rapidly changing land use in the Irvine-Newport Beach Business Center. The district will also share in the cost of the Baker-Gisler Interceptor and the Baker Force Main. Overall major facilities improvements in the district include the Lemon Heights Parallel/Replacement Subtmnk, the North Trunk Replacement, Gisler-Red Hill Interceptor . Parallel, various pump station modifications and abandonments and projects for the rehabilitation of manholes. The total estimated cost to implement the 1989 Master Plan recommendations is $34 million through the year 2020. In February 1991 the Board of Directors of District No. 7 adopted a sanitary sewer service charge for fiscal year 1991-92. DISTRICT NO. 11 County Sanitation District No. 11 encompasses 15.8 square miles. It is governed by 3 Directors representing the agencies shown in Exhibit No. 12. District No. I I's western boundary is the Pacific Ocean and it is the Western most District of the 7 Districts which comprised the Joint Outfall Organization(JOS). County Sanitation District No. 11 serves the majority of the City of Huntington Beach and provides service, by contractual agreement, to the Sunset Beach Sanitary District and portions of the seaside coastal community. The southeast portion of the district is served by the Coast Trunk System, generally parallel to Pacific Coast Highway. The northwest half of the district is served by the Knott Interceptor system via the Slater Avenue Pumping Station. A8 District No. 11 flow is tributary to Plant No. 2. The 1989 Master Plan indicates that gravity system deficiencies are limited to the northerly portion of the district. Three alternatives were evaluated for correcting the deficiencies in District No. 11. It was determined that the best method of operation was to continue in the present mode, utilizing the Knott Interceptor system, expanding the capacity of the Slater Avenue Pump Station, replacing the badly deteriorated Golden West Interceptor with a larger trunk, constructing a relief sewer in Springdale Street between Edinger and McFadden, constructing a new trunk sewer in Heil Avenue from Springdale Street to Golden West Ilm County Saoitatiw District ofOreoge County Page 7 Prepared By Ford Sauvajot Memgement Group,Inc. 6/17196 Street and building a short parallel sewer in Warner Avenue east of Bolas. Chica Road. A new force main is also required downstream of the Slater Avenue Pump Station. The first projects, which began design in 1990, are the Golden West Replacement/Heil Interceptor and the Slater Avenue Pump Station Improvement. The total estimated cost for District No. 11 improvements is S 16 million through 2020. There are two remaining annexable areas within District No. 11— the Bolas Chica and the Sunset Beach Sanitary Districts. In order to serve Bolm Chica, the district would need to complete trunk sewer facilities in that area. The extension of these master plan sewers will be implemented depending upon development trends and available funding. Since the district presently serves the Sunset Beach Sanitary District under contract, no facilities are necessary. In December 1987 the Board of Directors approved a sanitary sewer service charge for the District 11 service area. DISTRICT NO. 13 District No. 13 is governed by 5 Directors representing the agencies shown in Exhibit No. 12. The formation of County Sanitation District No. 13 became effective January 1, 1985. The district is located to the northeast of District Nos. 2 and 7 and encompasses 36.8 square miles, of which over 60o/o are designated as recreational and open space. It includes areas which were included within the proposed master plan service area for District Nos. 2 and 7, but which had not yet been annexed to either district. It also includes properties annexed to District Nos. 2 and 7 subsequent to June 7, 1978, that more logically fit into District No. 13. The District serves the Cities of Anaheim, Brea, Orange and Yorba Linda. The formation of District 13 was the result of lengthy negotiations between the Districts and the County of Orange. These negotiations centered around the Districts' attempt to obtain a share of the ad valorem tax allocation to fund the new district's share of wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal costs. Pursuant to the negotiated agreement with the County, District No. 13 does not receive a share of the County ad valorem taxes, but relies on connection and user fees for necessary wastewater revenues. Collection of the wastewater occurs through the purchase of capacity in the existing facilities owned by District Nos. 2 and 7. Construction of new facilities to serve this district is not envisioned even though the 1989 Master Plan states that the total flow estimated is more than double the 11 MGD originally projected. The flow difference is confined to the areas tributary to Carbon Canyon and the Santa Ana River Interceptor. The 1989 Master Plan projected flows of 20.70 MGD to District No. 2 and 1.76 MGD to District No. 7 by the year 2020. DISTRICT NO. 14 The formation of County Sanitation District No. 14 became effective January 1, 1986. The District serves 59,000 acres of Irvine Ranch Water District's (IRWD's) 72,200-acre service area within south-central Orange County. District No. 14 is governed by 5 Directors representing the agencies shown in Exhibit No. 12. The County Sanitation District of Orange County Page 8 Prepared By Ford Sauvajot Management Group,Inc. 6/17/96 The formation of District No. 14 was the result of ongoing negotiations with IRWD. The primary objective in expanding the Districts' boundaries was to provide trunk sewer, wastewater treatment, and disposal services to the 59,000-acre area in the most economically favorable and environmentally sound manner. Because of the projected growth expected to occur within the IRWD service area, which would result in flows above the 15 MGD capacity at ULWD's Michelson Water Reclamation Plant, alternative wastewater treatment and disposal methods were studied. The investigations by both IRWD and the Districts showed that the formation of the new district would provide certain financial advantages to each agency as well as potential long-term environmental benefits,thereby enhancing the entire community served by both the Districts and IRWD. Flow originating from District No. 14 began in December 1986. District 14 has participated in cost-sharing to build some of the major transmission and pumping facilities necessary to transport the wastewater generated in District No. 14 through District No. 7 to Reclamation Plant No. 1. Projected flows from District No. 14 are those diverted from IRWD which cannot be used for reclamation/reuse. For the first 10 years following the formation of District No. 14,these flows were estimated to range from 1 MGD during the summer months to 15 MGD during the winter months. Currently, the flow varies between 4 MGD and 12 MGD depending upon the time of year. Ultimately,by the year 2020, it is estimated that up to 32 MGD may be expected from the portion of IRWD included within District No. 14. District No. 14 is currently served by the Sunflower Interceptor system through an interim connection at the Main Street Pump Station. The district participated in the design and construction of the Baker-Gisler Interceptor which will be operational in 1997. District No. 14 projects expenditures in the range of$16 million for its share of the Baker-Gisler Interceptor, Baker-Gisler Force Mains and improvements to the Main Street Pump Station. The County Satutation District of Omp County Page 9 Prepued By Ford Sauvajot Management Gmup,Inc. 6117/96 3. DESCRIPTION OF JOINT WORKS OPERATIONS, BUDGET AND CAPITAL PROGRAM A. History In the early 1900's Orange County was primarily agricultural, but already recognized the need for an inter-city or metropolitan sewerage system. To meet this need, the Joint Outfall Sewer Organization (JOS) was formed in 1921. The organization was a joint powers arrangement among the Cities of Anaheim, Santa Ana, Fullerton, and Orange, and sanitary districts of Placentia, Buena Park, La Habra and Garden Grove. During the 1920's, the JOS constructed a system to serve the eight-member organization with a treatment plant located at what is now the District's Reclamation Plant No. 1. The JOS also constructed a 24-inch cast iron pipe that disposed of screened wastewater a short _ distance into the surface near the mouth of the Santa Ana River. Due to the inflexibility of the state's Joint Powers Act and the financing limitations of the JOS, the Districts were formed by the Board of Supervisors during the years 1947-48 under the provisions of Division 5, Part 3, Chapter 3, Section 4700, et. seq., of the Health and Safety Code. The formation followed recommendations outlined in a comprehensive countywide engineering study and report commissioned by the Board of Supervisors. The Districts' formation was patterned after the experience of neighboring Los Angeles County where Sanitation Districts have been in operation for more than 20 years. The Districts' boundaries were established based on geography,topography and existing public entities. Bond issues, which helped to finance the acquisition of treatment and disposal facilities and property of the JOS, were successful in the seven existing districts at the election in 1949. In addition, the bond issues helped to finance a supplementary network of trunk sewers in each of the seven original districts. Operation by the Districts began in 1954, following the acquisition of the JOS treatment facilities in Fountain Valley, the construction of the Huntington Beach plant, and completion of a new ocean outfall. During the interim, from the Districts' formation to actual operation, the JOS facilities continued to provide wastewater treatment. In 1954, the Districts began full operation with a network of trunk sewers, two treatment plants, and a new 7,200-foot long, 78-inch diameter ocean outfall terminating a depth of 60 ft, originally known as Ocean Outfafl No. I and now called Discharge Serial No. 002 in the Districts' NPDES Permit. The initial flow of wastewater collected by the joint system was approximately 18 million gallons per day (MOD), generated by a population of approximately 200,000 people. This outfall is now available for use only during emergencies. The 78-inch outfall had a design capacity of 256 MOD. The present capacity has been increased 20 MOD by the replacement of 2,000 feet (ft) of 120-inch pipe on the land section of Discharge Serial No. 002. The Cowry Sanitanw District oromg.Cowry Page 10 Prepared By Ford Saunjot Management Getup.Inc. 6/17/96 Oceanographic studies for a new ocean outfall began in 1962 and resulted in the design of Ocean Outfall No. 2, now designated as Discharge Serial No. 001 in the Districts' NPDES permit. The extensive research of offshore currents, ecology of the ocean floor and scientific technology had been used as a design basis for such a project. Construction was initiated in 1970. The outfall pipe is 120 -inches in diameter and approximately five miles long. The last mile is a 6,000-ft diffuser section. In April 1971, the Districts began operating the new $10 million outfall, which has greatly enhanced the protection and quality of the Orange County Shoreline from Corona del Mar to Seal Beach. Minimum initial dilution achieved by the diffuser is about 148:1 (148 parts seawater to I part of treated wastewater) when the wastewater effluent exits the diffuser ports at an average depth of 185 ft. According to the 1989 Master Plan, the 480 MOD outfall does not have sufficient capacity to handle the Districts' projected peak flows past the year 2000. The outfall flow has exceeded 480 MGD three times in the past two winters, reaching 485 MGD, 520 MGD and 560 MOD. This highest flow occurred on January 4, 1995. The 1989 Master Plan projected that the existing Discharge Serial No.002 (that is presently designated as an emergency outfall only)will have to be used occasionally before the year 2000 during peak wet weather flows. These assumptions and flows projected in 1989 are being reassessed. Several flow management projects are under design to provide emergency relief(in system storage) until a new outfall pipe can be constructed. By years 2000-2005, it is estimated that a new outfall pipe could be needed to accommodate the projected peak storm flow increased and dilution ratios needed to remain within NPDES permit requirements, as needed. This new outfall will probably be constructed parallel to Discharge Serial No. 001, The depth and configuration have yet to be determined. This requirement is currently being reanalyzed as part of the revision of the Strategic Plan that is now underway. B. Organization and Function The Districts are made up of nine separate public agencies. Each District is a political subdivision of the State of California and is governed by a representative of each city and sanitary district within the district and a member of the Orange County Board of Supervisors. Each district has its own budget. All districts except District Nos. 13 and 14 have thew own tax rate and trunk sewer systems. District No. 13 buys capacity in the other districts' facilities. The Boards of Directors meet in Joint Session on the fourth Wednesday of every month to conduct business of their districts and the joint districts. During the formation of the Districts in 1947 and 1948, it was decided that individual districts would not act independently with respect to treatment and disposal. Consequently, a Joint Administrative Organization was formed to administer the business of the jointly owned treatment and disposal facilities and the activities common to all districts in an effective and economical manner. This is provided for in the Joint Ownership Operation and Construction Agreement. The day-to-day operation of the organization is under the direction of a General Manager, two assistant general managers, seven department heads, and an authorized staff of 673 for the current fiscal year. The Como,Sanitation District of Omnge County Page 11 Prepved By Ford Sauvajot Managemmt Group,Inc. 6/17/96 The`Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement" (Agreement) under which the Districts currently operate the sewage system was negotiated and made effective July 1, 1985. Amendment No. I to the Agreement dated February 13, 1986, provides for the inclusion of District No. 14. The Districts are a single-purpose public entity formed solely for the processing and disposal of wastewater and its residuals and serve the wastewater collection, treatment and disposal needs of approximately 2.2 million people. During 1994-1995, an average daily sewage influent flow of 244 MOD was treated and 510 wet tons per day of residual solids (biosolids) was produced. The districts encompass a 470 square-mile area of Orange County that includes 23 of the Cowry's 31 cities. C. Description of Joint Works Facilities The Districts are co-participants in an agreement dated March 10, 1971, as amended July 1, 1985, which provides for the joint construction, ownership and operation of the treatment plants, sewer trunks, equipment and other assets. They maintain and operate a large system of trunk sewers, pumping stations, and two modem treatment plants that process an average of more than 235 million gallons of wastewater per day. The purpose of the Districts' wastewater management program is to protect the public's health, preserve the beneficial uses of coastal waters, and maintain air quality. The objectives of operating the treatment plants are to process and dispose of the treated wastewater and the separated solids in accordance with Federal, state and local laws. Among the agencies which regulate the Districts' operations are: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency(USEPA); California Regional Water Quality Control Board(CRWQCB); California Integrated Waste Management Board; California Environmental Protection Agency;and South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD). The Districts are issued operating permits by USEPA and CRWQCB for the operation of the joint facilities and discharge of the treated wastewater to the Pacific Ocean. The Districts operate the third largest wastewater management agency on the West Coast, The Districts serve a population of approximately 2.2 million people with collection, treatment and disposal facilities worth more than one billion dollars. The Joint Facilities consist of nine individual districts, which own about 650 miles of major trunk sewers, 26 pumping stations and two major treatment plants with disposal facilities to safely discharge the treated effluent through an ocean outfall into deep ocean waters. Reclamation Plant No. 1 is located in Fountain Valley about four miles from the coast adjacent to the Santa Ana River at the 405 Freeway. It has a current operational primary treatment capacity, including standby, of 108 MOD. Reclamation Plant No. 1 has a secondary treatment capacity of 66 MGD. Treatment Plant No. 2 is located 1,500 feet from the ocean at the mouth of the Santa Ana River on Brookhurst Street in Huntington Beach. It has a primary treatment capacity, including standby, of 286 MGD. Plant No. 2 provides advanced primary treatment to all The County Simtmon District ofOrenge County Page 12 PreWM By Ford Saunjol Mmmgemml Group.loc. 6/17/96 of the wastewater that enters the plant and secondary treatment to up to 75 MGD of the total flow. The quality of the treated wastewater exceeds the standards of the California Ocean Plan established by the State Water Resources Control Board to protect the marine environment and coastline. The Districts have an extensive ocean monitoring program to ensure protection of public health, the protection and propagation of shellfish, fish and wildlife, and to allow safe recreational use of coastal waters. Ocean Outfall Booster Station No. 2 serves the treatment plants with a hydraulic capacity of 600 MGD(120 million of which is standby). It is an ocean outfall booster station which pumps the treated flow through a 120-inch, five mile long ocean outfall pipe which discharges at an average depth of 185 feet. The last 6,000 feet is the diffuser section that ensures that processed wastewater will have greater than 150:1 dilution at the diffuser ports. The Districts also operate activated sludge facilities at both Reclamation Plant No. 1 and Treatment Plant No. 2 to improve the quality of treated wastewater discharged to the ocean. During fiscal year 1994-1995, an average of 2.8 MGD of the Districts' secondary treated water was made available to Water Factory 21, a tertiary treatment plant operated by the Orange County Water District for their seawater intrusion barrier and Green Acres projects. The two treatment plants have a primary treatment capacity of 394 MOD. Daily flow presently averages approximately 237 MGD compared to the 242 MGD as of 6/30/95 as shown in Table 3.1 below. The 1989 Master Plan identified projects designed to meet projected wastewater treatment needs until the year 2020. The 1989 Master Plan estimated that by 1994, the total projected average daily flow rate at both plants would be 290 MGD, and by 2001, 322 MGD. However, the continuing effects of the drought of the 1980's and 1990's, the economic recession in California, and the implementation of water conservation programs throughout the Districts' service area have had a significant impact on earlier estimates. Current estimates for the year 2001 are 280 MGD. (See Section 3.I.) The County Sanitation Disma of 0=ge Cowry Page 13 ftcMW By Ford Sauvajot Mmmgematt Getup,Inc. 6/17196 Selected statistical information is provided in the following table: Table 3.1 Joint Works Facilities As of June 30, 1995 Total Population Served (estimated) 2,275,000 Service Area(estimated) 440 square miles Total Number of Cities Served 23 Total Miles of Trunk Sewers 650 Number of Pumping Stations 26 Number of Treatment Plants Reclamation Plant No. I Rated Capacity 108 MGD Treatment Plant No. 2 Rated Capacity 286 MGD Total Rated Capacity 394 MGD Reported Average Daily Flow Reclamation Plant No. 1 84 MGD Treatment Plant No. 2 158 MGD Total Average Daily Flow 242 MGD Water Reclamation (FY 1994-95) 2.8 MGD (Average Gallons Per Day) Primary/Secondary Treatment Plant No. 1 84 MGD/64 MGD (FY 1994.95 Average) Plant No. 2 158 MGD/60 MGD Valuation of Fixed Assets (As of June 30, 1995) (Jointly owned Property, Plant, $742,677,706 Equipment and Construction in Progress) D. Description of Sanitary Sewer Svstem The Districts act as`wholesalers," receiving wastewater from the collection systems of the various cities, water districts and local sewer agencies. They do not deal directly with individuals except for portions of District No. 7 which are located primarily in - unincorporated territory of the County. District No. 7 provides `retail service" and "wholesale service." The Districts' 650 miles of trunk sewers gather sewage flow and directs it to the treatment plants. Along the system are 26 pumping stations to lift the flow in order to maintain a The County Sanimtion fhs1nct of orange County Page 14 Prepared By Ford Sauv jot Management Group,Inc. 6/17/96 Flow at least two feet per second. The Districts maintain a high level of service which requires that collection system workers inspect pumping stations daily. State-of-the-art computer monitoring equipment in the Districts' Operations Control Center keeps a constant surveillance on the entire system. Principal characteristics of the system are noted below: • Sewer Tnmk pipe sizes 36"-96"diameter • Force mains 15 miles • Maintenance holes 13,000(est.) • Average daily flow(1994-95) 242 MGD • Storm peak 550 MGD Districts' property, plant, equipment and concoction in progress are recorded at cost, except for assets acquired by contribution, which are recorded at fair market value at the time received. Assets of the Districts may be for individual District assets or their respective share of joint assets. Table 3.2 summarizes the respective District ownership in jointly owned and separately owned property, plant, equipment and construction in progress, at cost, as of June 30, 1995. Table 3.2 Property,Plant and Equipment 1995 District No. Jointly Owned Separately Owned Total 1 $65,484,523 $7,054,160 $72,538,683 2 196,054,032 97,426,183 293,480,215 3 202,915,618 62,706,381 265,621,999 5 24,048,645 34,646,296 58,694,941 6 31,243,180 4,320,543 35,563,723 7 55,891,945 37,741,469 93,633,414 11 42,102,182 19,229,323 61,331,505 13 6,395,459 2,616,757 9,012,216 14 42.168.194 19.389A02 61557196 Total $666,303,779 $'285.130.114 $951.433.892 7Te Co®ty Sarat•um Distrip of Orange Caaty Page 15 Prepared By Ford Saurajot M®agenaeat GruW,Inc. 6117196 Table 3.2 (continued) Construction in Progress 1995 District No. Jointly Owned Separately Owoed g'y� 1 $8,814,734 - $9,814,734 2 23,753,523 $189,466 23,942,999 3 23,593,463 4,041,223 27.634.686 5 3,346,919 32,828 3,379,747 6 3,223,724 1,353,534 4,577,258 7 5,606,371 3,105,346 9,711,717 11 4,223,663 4,415,217 8,639,990 13 501,977 - 501,977 14 3.309.554 5,922,851 9,232,405 Total $76,373,928 $19,060,465 S95,434,393 Total Property, Plant & Equipment $742,677,706 $304,190,579 $1,046,868,285 Less accumulated depreciation $282,776,401 Net Property, Plant & Equipment c764,091_994 Consolidation of the Districts into a single County Sanitation District would eliminate the jointly owned" and "separately owned" status of these fixed assets. The new County Sanitation District would be the successor owner of these assets. There is no anticipated impact of this change in ownership status on the number and type of facilities required to operate and maintain the existing sewer system. As has been observed earlier in this report, the 'Jointly owned" and "separately owned" property, plant and equipment are presently integrated into a single sewer system that is operated and maintained through a "Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement" which has been operative since July 1, 1970. For many years the Districts have planned, constructed, and acquired plant and equipment jointly. Consolidation would not require any exchange or payment to the existing nine Districts. for the transfer of property and other assets to the newly formed County Sanitation District. Section 57501 of the California Crovenunent Code provides as follows: 57501. No payment for the use, or right of use, of any property, real or personal, acquired or constructed by any predecessor district shall be required by reason of the consolidation of the district with other predecessor districts. The County Sanitation District of Orange County Page 16 Pmvmed By Ford Sauvajot Maaa is amt Getup,Inc 6117196 E. Relationship of the Joint Works Operations to Districts The Districts utilize joint operating, working capital and capital outlay accounts to pay joint operating and construction costs. These costs are subsequently allocated to the Districts based on gallons of sewage flow. Each District is charged its proportion of the necessary expenses equal to the proportion of the annual gallonage flows from each District to the total annual gallonage flows from all Districts. The cost of new construction of plant and other necessary facilities is also similarly allocated to each District. The percentage of each District's ownership in jointly owned plant and facilities is annually calculated according to the mathematical average of sewage flows for the three years immediately preceding the first day of July of each year for each District to the total three year average for all the Districts. This percentage is applied against the total capital investment in the Joint Facilities and establishes the ownership equity required by each respective District. District No. 14 has a special calculated annual flow equal to three times the four highest months' flow beginning in Fiscal Year 1995-96. The Districts rely on a single staff for administration and operation and maintenance. Each year, Districts' staff prepare annual operating plans for each District. These annual operating plans or budgets, are adopted by the respective Boards of Directors, and are used to serve as the basis for monitoring financial matters, estimating the levy and collection of taxes and determining future service charge rates. For all practical purposes, therefore, the Districts' staff performs all administrative, operational,and new construction functions for the Joint Works Operations and individual District needs. Consolidation of the Districts would not affect the manner in which the sewer system is operated and maintained as this has already been accomplished through the"Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement." F. Description of Operations and Maintenance The Districts maintain a staff of highly skilled employees trained in all aspects of administration, finance, engineering, environmental management and sanitary maintenance. District forces perform a wide variety of tasks, including but not limited to, wastewater treatment plant operation, pump tear-down and repair, pipeline repair and replacement, environmental management, laboratory functions, complex financial activities, regional planning for air quality improvement, and other quality of fife concerns, etc. Districts personnel are also trained in the day to day operational functions of the Districts' modem wastewater collection system which includes a state-of-the-art telemetry and control system. This system monitors and control the Districts' 650 miles of trunk sewer system. The Districts electrical and instrumentation staff maintains the Districts' extensive electrical, instrumentation and communications network. This maintenance includes the Central Power Generation System, emergency power units, motors, breakers, wiring, source sensors, radios,etc.,their calibration,troubleshooting,repair and/or replacement. Facilities are continuously monitored and upgraded as needed to provide the utmost in electrical efficiency. For example, the Districts use of digester gas to generate electricity in their cogeneration facilities has proved to be an economic alternative to the purchase of power. Training is an important component to ensure that all technical personnel maintain The County Sanitation District of Orange Comty Page 17 Prepared By Ford Samiot Management Group,Inc. 6/17/96 proficiency in their requisite skills. For the past 20 years the Districts have monitored the marine environment off the California coast to document any effects from the discharge of treated wastewater. The Districts' marine monitoring program includes offshore water quality sampling and analysis, surfzone and beach monitoring, trawling and rig fishing, and sea bottom monitoring. A modem laboratory tests data to assess the effectiveness of the various plant treatment processes and develops new procedures to protect the environment. Districts staff make nearly 2,500 inspections annually and collect over 4,500 industrial wastewater samples for laboratory analysis. Monitoring and corrective actions by the Districts have reduced incoming toxic pollutants 82% since 1976. The Districts also provide modem administrative and management support functions and are constantly on the alert for evaluating and implementing improvements to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of operations. The Joint Boards approved a reorganization of the Districts top management team and established two Assistant General Manager positions to oversee Operations and Administration. Additional major changes for Fiscal Year 1996-97 include: • Establishing an Operations and Maintenance Department to promote cross- training and work force flexibility. • Establishing a Training Division within Human Resources to centralize and improve training programs. • Creating the General Services Administration to include Information Technology with the intent of accelerating the Plant Automation Program. • Reducing the number of authorized positions from 678 to 624 in an effort to reduce costs and become more competitive. • Creation of a Districts-wide performance measurement program to 'improve productivity and accountability. G. Budeet The Fiscal Year 1995-96 Joint Operating budget is $54.38 million. This finances the operating and maintenance cost of the joint treatment works and the joint administrative activities. These consist of the cost to operate, maintain and manage the two treatment plants. All of the personnel costs for all of the Districts are initially recorded in the Joint Operating Fund and either allocated or charged to the proper funds for the work being done through a job cost system. Consolidation of the Districts would simplify some of the accounting requirements by having only one budget for the proposed new Sanitation District compared to nine District budgets and the Joint Operating Budget. Over the past years the Districts have been able to realize budgetary savings from a variety of operational and programmatic changes in the Joint Operating expenditures. Some of these items are listed below: The County sanitation District of Orange County Page la Prryued By Ford Sauniot Mamgement Group.Inc. 6/17196 Central Power Generation Generating power to reduce estimated savings of$6 power purchases million per year. Water Conservation Reduced flows to the estimated overall treatment plants by savings of about $1.1 approximately 50 MOD million per year. Advanced Primary Treatment Avoided construction of estimated $700,000 per another 40 MOD activated year savings in power sludge plant needs. Source Control Program Reduction of incoming BOD estimated$600,000 per year savings. Consolidation of the Districts would ensure that Joint Works Facilities operating and administrative activities are continued. Overall benefits directly accrue to customers as savings through improved operating methods. Table 3.3 summarizes the Fiscal Year 1995-96 Joint Operating budget and compares it to the Fiscal Year 1994-95. In addition to the Joint Operating Budget, the Districts budget for the operating and maintenance costs of the sewage collection system. These costs, as noted earlier in this report, for personnel, contracts, and all other operatingimaintenance expenditures are centrally managed by the Districts. Each District's share of these costs are allocated on annual flows. Table 3.4 summarizes the Operating Fund Budget for Fiscal Year 1995-96 for the Districts with a comparison to the Fiscal Year 1994-95 budget. This summary includes the Districts' share of Joint Operating Expenses. ' Consolidation of the Districts will result in eliminating the need to prepare, review, adopt, and administer nine separate District Budgets. Exhibit 2 displays the individual District budgets for Fiscal Year 1995-96. H. Sanitary Sewer Service Charges and Other Sources of Operating Revenues The Districts' operating revenues are principally derived from sanitary sewer service charges, and interest earnings on invested funds. Each of the Districts operates as an enterprise activity. Enterprise funds account for operations that are financed and operated in a manner similar to private business enterprises, where the intent of the Board of Directors is that costs (expenses, including depreciation and amortization) of providing services to the general public on a continuing basis be financed primarily through user charges. Table 3.5 summarizes the operating revenues budgeted for Fiscal Year 1995-96 and 1994-95. The Cowry Sanitation District of Orwge Cowry page 19 Prepared By Ford Sa.vojot Management Group,Inc. 6/17/96 Table 3.3 Joint Operating Budget 1994-95 1995-96 Description Budget Budget 1. Net Salaries, Wages& Benefits $26,818,000 28,667,000 2. Odor Control&Chemical Coagulants 3,725,000 5,363,500 3. Contractual Services 6,825,000 7,269,500 4. Professional Services 1,154,000 1,512,600 S. Repair&Maintenance 3,675,000 4,209,900 Materials& Services 6. Research& Monitoring 3,050,000 3,095,000 7. Utilities 3,915,000 3,375,500 8. Other Materials, Supplies, Outside Services Equipment,& Offsets 4,080,000 4,687.000 Total Joint Operating Expenses $53,242,000 $58,180,000 Revenues and Offsets 3.700.000 3.800A00 Net Joint Operating S49.542.000 S54.380.000 Budget to Treat 1 Million Gallons $578 $628 The Camty Smitatioe Distract of Omge Comty Page 20 Prepared By Ford Sauvajot Mmagemaat Gmup,I=. 6117196 Table 3.4 All Districts' Ooeratine Fund Budgets 1994.95 1995-% Budget Budget Overatin Directors' Fees $128,500 $155,500 Share ofloint Operating 49,542,000 54,380,000 Contractual Services 8,308,000 8,410,500 Utilities 666,000 676,000 Sanitary Sewer Service Charge Expense 192,000 119,000 Professional Services I48,000 178,000 Printing and Publication 16,500 11,500 Travel&Meeting- Directors Mileage 12,000 11,500 Uncollectible Accounts 9,000 30,000 Total Operating $59,022,000 $63,972,000 Non-Ooeratine Certificate of Participation 5,264,000 3,685,000 Servicellransfer Interest 0 0 Expenses Applicable to Prior Years 12,000 0 Total Non-Operating $5,276,000 $3,685,000 Total Operating& Non-Operating $64,298,000 $67,657,000 Reserves Portion of Self-insurance 157,692,000 89,130,000 Reserve Appropriation for 11,806,000 12,795,000 Contingencies Dry Period Reserve 31,234,000 31,000,000 Total Reserves $200,732,000 5131,925,000 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 5265.030.000 5199.582.000 The Camry Smtatim Dist iu of Orsoge Co mty Pegc 2t Frc and By Ford Sauwjat Maoagemmt Gmup,Iac. 6117196 Table 3.5 All Districts' ODerat'tn2 Fund Revenues Revenues 1994-1995 1995-1996 Industrial/Commercial User Fees $8,430,000 $7,960,000 Sanitary Sewer Service Charges 61,239,000 62,151,000 Interest&Misc. Receipts 15,772,000 6,197,000 Transfers From Other Funds 0 1,500,000 Total Revenues $85,441,000 $77,808,000 Other Available Fundine Cash& Investments 179,589,000 121,774,000 Total Available Funding $265,030,000 $199,582,000 Existing Annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charge The Annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charges are currently collected as a separate line item in the property tax bill received by service area residents. The Districts' existing charges are as follows: a. Single family homes, condominiums/townhouses: Value-X per dwelling unit b. Apartments and mobile homes: Value-60%of X per dwelling unit C. Commercial/industrial including hotels, motels: Value- 71.5% of X per thousand square feet. The current charge structure is based on using the County Assessor's property tax database. The annual sanitary sewer service charge is not a tax, but it is a charge for use. As such, it is collected on all developed properties including tax exempt facilities such as federal, state and local government buildings, churches, hospitals and schools, etc. All properties connected to a District sewer are assessed the charge. Table 3.6 depicts the sanitary sewer service charges levied by all Districts, but excluding District No. 14. The charges(fees)were effective July 1, 1992, and have not been increased since that time and remain at the same level for Fiscal Year 1995-96. District No. 14 is funded by the Irvine Ranch Water District. The average annual fee for a single family residential dwelling unit (D.U.)is$71.68. This compares very favorably with a survey conducted by the Management Consulting division of the firm Black&Veatch which reported an average California 1994 rate per D.U. of$184.80. The Cowty Sanitation District of Ormgc Cowry Page 22 Prepared By Ford Smvajot Mm°gemwt GFoW,Inc. 6117196 Table 3.6 Annual Sanitary Sewer Service Chartres All Districts Effective 7-1-92 ORD 109 210 309 516 609 725 1108 1303 Nos. 121 216 319 528 622 729 I115 1310 Class of User Basis of District District District District District District District District Charge No. I No. 2 No. 3 No.5 No.6 No. 7 No. 11 No. 13 Single Fam/ Charge per $83.24 $71.52 $73.89 $96.75 $76.47 $50.09 $60.00 $100.00 Condominiums D.U. Multi-Fart✓Mobile Charge per 49.94 42.91 44.33 58.05 45.88 30.05 36.00 60.00 D.U. Commercial/Industrial/ Charge per 59.52 51.14 52.83 69.18 54.68 35.81 42.90 71.50 Other(gov't, Utilities, 1,000 sq. ft. Non-profit of building Organizations, etc.) District No. 14 is funded by the Irvine Ranch Water District. The County Sanitation District oromnge county Page 23 Prepared ay Ford Suuvajot Management Group,Inc. 6117196 It is noted that, while the Districts have been able to maintain level sanitary sewer service charges for several years by avoiding costs, holding vacant positions open, reducing operational costs, and deferring new facilities, the trend cannot continue. Cash flow projections for the next five and ten years indicate that fee increases will be necessary, unless the revised Strategic Plan makes dramatic changes. The Districts have varying expenditure requirements for capital improvements and to operate and maintain facilities due to their unique financial history and geography. With the exception of Districts No. 13 and No. 14, all Districts receive a portion of the Ad Valorem tax which is allocated to debt service that funds capital improvements. All these Districts also levy sanitary sewer service charges of varying amounts to fund remaining expenditures. District No. 13's and No. 14's only revenue are sewer service charges. (As noted earlier,No. 14 is funded by IRWD.) Source Control User Fees Large industrial, commercial and other institutional users are subject to source control user fees which are calculated separately to recover the difference between actual cost of service and other funds collected on the tax bill. These fees are collected quarterly by direct billing and average about $933 per million gallons. In those cases, credit is given for the annual sanitary sewer service charge and property taxes paid. L Coital Program - Joint Works Facilities and All Districts The Districts make all capital improvement expenditures in accordance with an adopted and fimded Capital Improvement Plan (CEP). The Districts develop an annual five-year plan for capital improvements, including design, development, and implementation. Table 3.7 depicts Fiscal Year 1995-96 CIP funding for Joint Works Facilities. Please refer to Exhibit 3 for detailed listing of all capital improvement projects covering the period of Fiscal Year 1995-96 to Fiscal Year 2000-05; and also to Exhibit 4 which graphically depicts the total Joint Works Facilities capital improvement expenditures for Fiscal Year 1995-96. As a result of potential losses from investments within the Orange County Investment Pool and because of projected decreases in wastewater flows, the 1995-96 joint works capital improvement budget is considerably lower than the Fiscal Year 1994-95 budget of $67.8 million. Revised projected wastewater flows in the year 2000 have decreased from the 318 MGD estimated in the 1989 Master Plan to the current estimate of 275 MGD (a decrease of 13.5%). Please refer to Section 3.C. The Districts Fiscal Year 1995-96 work Program includes a critical review of the Master Plan to determine whether the Districts still need to construct capital improvements at the aggressively high levels previously anticipated. The Cowry Seoiteaw District of Orange County Page 24 Prepared By Ford Sauvajot Management Groap,Inc. 6/17/96 Table 3.7 1995-96 CIP Funding - Joint Works Facilities Additional Improved Replacement/ Item Capacity Treatment Rehabilitation Total Primary Treatment $1.000,000 $150,000 51.350.000 $2,500.000 Secondary Treatment $5.325.000 $2.600.000 $25.000 $7.950.00D Solids Digestion — — 5250,000 $250.0110 Electrical Power Svnems $200.000 $925.1x10 $825.000 $1.950.000 Safety Improvements — 51.350,000 $3.575,000 54.925.000 Miscellaneous Projects 5325,000 5870.000 $2.095,000 $3.280.000 Ocean Oudall Svstems 5300,000 — 51.285.000 s1.585.000 Studies and Research 5130.000 5450.000 $60.0011 %40.000 Support Facilities $350.000 5160,000 $3.325,000 53.835.000 Information Managerrem Services $130,000 $1.495.000 51.970,000 $3.615.000 Eqw mcm 5900_000 $1.500.000 5600_000 $3,000.000 Total $8 M 0`00 S9 S�00L $15.350,000 S33�4304100 The consolidation of the Districts into one Sanitation District would significantly reduce the cost of managing the Capital Improvement Plan. There would be efficiencies obtained from the development and implementation of a single CEP with all the attendant savings that would be derived from streamlining fund accounting and allocating costs to the various Districts for joint works improvements. In addition to the Joint Works Facilities capital improvements, the Districts fund a number of projects to maintain the sewer collection system. These projects are depicted in Exhibit 5. Fiscal Year 1995-96 projects are summarized as below in Table 3.9. Table 3.8 Summary of Budgeted Capital Expenditures- All Districts 1995-96 1994-95 Project Expenditures Sudan t Budget District Pump Station Projects $1,315.000 $5.018,000 District Sewer/Interceptor Projects 11,625,000 12,881,000 District Misc, Projects 480.000 851,000 Joint Worsts Equity Purchase 8,203.000 8.947,000 Transfer to Other Funds 1.500.000 0 Reimbursement Agreements 109,000 109,000 Total Projects $23,232,000 $27,806,000 Capital Reserves Share of Capital Reserve $50,000,000 $100,000,000 Share of Environmental Reserve 51001,000 10,000,000 Eanhquake/Flood/Insumnce Reserve 87,270,000 139,115,000 Total Capital Reserves $142,271,000 $249,115,000 31ae County Sanitation District of orange Comm Pagc 25 Prepared By Ford Seuvejol Mmagemenl Group,Inc. 6/1 T96 Available funding to finance the above Fiscal Year 1995-96 projects and reserves, plus the Joint Works Facilities of$33,530,000 for a total of$199,033,000 is summarized in Table 3.9 below. Table 3.9 Available Funding Fiscal Year 1995-% Cash& Investments $171,337,000 User Fees 6,500,000 Connection Fees 4,748,000 Sale of Capacity Rights 644,000 Joint Works Equity Sale 8,203,000 Interest&Mae. Receipt 7 601 000 Total Available Funding $199,033,000 Debt service requirements and associated revenues are discussed in Section 3.K. of this report. The Districts currently levy a uniform agency-wide connection fee at $2350 per equivalent dwelling unit. Connection fees meet the"fair share"test of the Federal Clean Water Act. Consolidation would retain such connection fees at the present level. J. Capital Financine Methods and Capital Revenues During 1988, the Districts embarked upon a 30-year planning program referred to as the "2020 VISION'Master Plan because it considers the Districts' planning needs to the year 2020. The Master Plan was produced following the most comprehensive wastewater management study ever undertaken by the Districts. The "2020 VISION' Master Plan established a Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), in accordance with three wastewater treatment scenarios. Specifically, the Master Plan identified significant annual expenses for the construction of both Joint Works and trunk sewer projects, as well as ongoing operation and maintenance costs(O&M). Table 3.10 is a summary of the Master Plan's total program costs(capital, O&M and debt service costs) for the 30-year period for each scenario, presented in current and inflated dollars. Prior to the Master Plan, the Districts were able to meet capital and O&M expenses from a combination of property tax revenues, user fees, connection fees, interest earnings on reserves, and federal and state grants. Due to the magnitude of identified future annual capital and operations and maintenance expenditures, and the discontinuation of federal and state grant programs, the Master Plan concluded that it was advisable to utilize debt financing to meet Districts' obligations. Debt financing, recommended by the Master Plan, would enhance each District's ability to meet projected construction schedules while achieving the lowest possible user fees, as well as long-term stability for the fees. The County Sanitation District of Orange Couuty Page 26 Pmpered By Ford Saurarot Management Group,Inc. 6117196 Table 3.10 Master Plan 30-Year Total Proaram Costs Scenario No. 1 Scenario No. 2 Scenato No.3 Capital Costs' $1,335,000,000 $1,480,000,000 $1,720,000,000 30-Year O&M Costs 1,510,000,000 1,620,000,000 1,850,000,000 Costs of Debt' 165,000,000 195,000,000 269,000,000 Total 1989 Dollars` $3,010,000,000 $3,295,000,000 $3,839,000,000 Total Inflated Dollars° $7,038,000,000 $7,853,000,000 $9,252,000,000 'Includes both Join,Work,and trunk sewers. `Cumulanve costa-current dollan. n Includes interest and cost of issuance. a Inflated at Rw percentperyrar. Source. Certificates ofParticiparion Financing Program-Policy andPro mulumsManual(111195) The Master Plan demonstrated the pay-as-you-go financing for necessary capital projects would require sharp increases in user fees form 1990 through 1992; with subsequent reductions as construction slows down over time. As expected with all-cash financing, user fees would fluctuate substantially in response to changes in project expenditures from year to year. Therefore, the Master Plan recommended a 50-50 mix of pay-as-you-go and debt financing. A Five-Year Financial Plan was developed to establish a financing parameter regarding the issuance of debt, the levying of user charges and the funds for reserves. The Financial Plan is revised periodically to reflect the most current cost and revenue figures and individual district capital and operating changes. The Debt Financing and Management Program was established to accomplish the following: • To finance assets with long useful lives with long-term debt; • To achieve the lowest possible interest cost and highest investment returns, commensurate with the appropriate risk;and • To recoup reserve moneys that had been previously spent. Table 3.11 summarizes the source of funding for the Capital Improvements Program, The County Sanitation District of Orange County Page 27 Prepared By Ford Sauvajot Management Group,Inc. 6/17196 Table 3.11 Potential Sources of Funding for Capital Improvements Program Ad Valorem Taxes User Fees Connection Fees Industrial Waster User Fees Sale of Capacity Rights/Prop" Redevelopment Agency Pass-through Agreements Subventions Interest and Miscellaneous Receipts All Districts, with the exception of Districts No. 13 and 14, receive property tax. The total property tax revenue projected for Fiscal Year 1995-96 is $31,162,000 and is about 6.7% of the total funding sources for the Districts. Consolidation would not jeopardize the continued levy of property taxes. It should be noted, however, that the Districts, beginning with Fiscal Year 1993-94, have allocated the entire property tax revenue to the retirement of long-term debt. Recent reductions in property tax, therefore, increase the potential for increases in user fees. The Districts experienced a decline in property taxes over the past several years due to two principal factors. There has been a Districts-wide $583 million decline in assessed valuations of taxable property from 1993-1994 to 1994-95 due to the poor economy. In addition, the Districts' participation in the "reeter Plan" with the County of Orange resulted in a one-time reduction of$2.0 million. Under the "Teeter Plan," the County fronts all assessed property tax revenues belonging to the Districts and is therefore entitled to all future penalties and interest received on the ultimate collection of delinquent property taxes. In total, property taxes declined about $8.6 million over the two year period of 1993-95. As the economy improves, however, property tax revenues will perform better. There has been continuing pressure to erode property tax through State government "take-aways" to help fund the State Budget. For Fiscal Year 1995-96, there is no anticipated state`Rake-away." IL Lone Term Debt As of June 30, 1995, the Districts had a number of debt issues outstanding. These issues include $408,210,000 of certificates of participation (COP) and $75,000 of general obligation (G.O.) bonds. The Districts have maintained their AA- rating from Standard and Poor's Corporation and As rating from Moody's Investor Services, although all COP issues are backed by issuance of letters of credit and are rated AAA. In January of 1995,the Districts retired S50 million of taxable commercial paper debt. No new debt was issued in Fiscal Year 1994-95 and no debt issuances are contemplated for Fiscal Year 1995-96. The Comfy Sammum District of o`mge Comfy Page 28 Prepared By Ford Seuvajot MwW mmt Gmup,Inc. 6/17/96 The Fiscal Year 1995-96 Budget provides for S34,602,000 to service the debt on various COPS issued since 1990. In addition, there is a S15,000 annual payment to maturity in January 1999 for the G.O. bonds in District No. 11. The Districts issue COPs in order to finance their respective share of the construction scheduled at the jointly owned treatment facilities. Each District is responsible for its own installment payment and is not obligated for arty other District's payments. Exhibit 6 describes the Certificates of Participation that were issued by the Districts. Exhibit 7 depicts the allocation of outstanding COP debt to the issuing Districts. Government Code Section 57502 provides for the following: 57501. The territory of a consolidated district shall be Itable for payment of principal, interest, and any other amounts which became due on account of any outstanding or then authorized but thereafter issued bonds, including revenue bonds, or other contracts or obligations of all predecessor districts, and are subject to the levying or fixing and collection of any of the following which may be necessary to provide for payment: (a) fazes or assessments. (b) Service charges, rentals, or rates. (c) Both taxes or assessments and service charges, rentals, or rates. However, only the territory within an improvement district shall be liable for any payment required on account of any bonds, tncludtng revenue bonds, or other contracts previously authorized or issued by, or on behalf of the improvement district. Based on the preceding section of the code and in the absence of improvement districts throughout the Distticts, it would be appropriate to establish benefit areas to allocate the costs of improvements and their payments. Consideration, therefore, should be given to establishing improvement districts to allocate the debt obligation to those properties within the original issuing Districts. Consolidation would result in all wastewater collection system facilities and wastewater treatment facilities to be jointly owned and operated. The existing practice of the Districts to allocate property tax to the capital improvement fund should be continued. Allocation of proportionate District share of the assets and their costs based on wastewater flows would be discontinued. L. Reserves The Districts have substantial reserves distributed in various accounts. Table 3.12 identifies the type of reserve and the amount budgeted for Fiscal Year 1995-96. The County Saturation Duaict or Orange County Page 29 Prepared By Ford Sauvajot Management Group,Inc. 6/17t96 Table 3.12 District Reserves Fiscal Year 1995-96 Budget Operating Reserves Catastrophe Reserve $88,130,000 Contingencies 12,795,000 Dry Period 31,000,000 Total $131,925,000 Capital Reserves(Non-Operating Capital $50,000,000 Environmental 5,001,000 Catastrophe Reserve 87,270,000 Total $142,271,000 Debt Service Reserves Debt Service $32,982,000 Master Plan Projects 8,971,000 Total 541,953,000 Prior to December 6, 1994, the Districts' entire investment portfolio was managed by the County Treasurer within the Orange County Investment Pool (OCIP). As a result of the County of Orange and OCIP bankruptcy, the Districts established their own cash management program by the completion of the following: • Appointing the Districts' Director of Finance as the Districts' Treasurer. • Created its own investment policy • Established its own banking relationships for the disbursement of funds to vendors and employees. • Expanded and enhanced internal controls over cash management. • Selected an outside money manager and independent custodian to manage the Districts' investment portfolio. On January 10, 1996, the Districts' Treasurer reported that all Investment Policy requirements adopted by the Joint Boards on May 24, 1995 were complied with and investment performance to date exceeded the index rates. Table 3.13 was reconstructed from the Treasurer's report and depicts the District's current investments. The County Sanumbon District of orange County Page 30 Prepared By Ford Seuvaiot Management Group,Inc. 6/17/96 Table 3.13 Investment Summary Balances Investments Nov,30, 1995 State of California LAW $11,443,353 Bank of America 241,095 Short-term Portfolio 60,356,395 Long-term Portfolio 234,421,057 District 1 I G.O. Bond Fund 11,886 Debt Service Reserve(Trustees) 33,883,435 Total $340,357,221 The Treasurer also reported that both the long-term portfolio and liquid operating moneys had an average portfolio credit quality of"AA." Consolidation of the Districts will have no impact on the investment policies and/or cash management. This is because Districts have already pooled their reserves and cash. The Districts' policy is to hold investments until maturity, or until market values equal or exceed costs. As a consolidated single County Sanitation District, California statutes authorize a County Sanitation District to invest in instruments which are presently allowable to the Districts pursuant the California Government Code. A Financial Oblieations The Districts have booked, as of June 30, 1995, over $2.5 million in potential compensated absences liabilities. In addition, there are claims and judgments payable amounting to $541,000. Districts funds are adequate to cover these obligations. The Districts are self-insured for workers' compensation, property damage and general liability. The self-insured portion for workers' compensation is $250,000 per person per occurrence with outside excess insurance coverage to the statutory limit. The self-insured portion for property damage covering fire, flood, and other perils is $25,000 per occurrence with outside excess insurance coverage to $200 million for fire, flood, and other perils. The self-insured portion for property damage covering earthquake is $250,000 or 5% per unit of insurance, whichever is greater, with outside insurance coverage to $30 million. The Districts also maintain outside comprehensive boiler and . machinery insurance with a $100 million per occurrence combined limit with deductibles ranging from $25,000 to $100,000. The Districts are completely self-insured for general liability coverage. Insurance coverages and policies are reviewed annually by the Boards of Directors and are subject to change. Consolidation of the Districts will have no impact on the liabilities of the Districts. Under consolidation into a single County Sanitation District, Government Code 57502 (see Section 3.K of this report) the new County Sanitation District assumes all predecessor District obligations. This is not an issue as the Districts are presently joined by agreement to manage and fund liabilities. The County Sanitation District of Orange County Page 31 Prepared By Ford Sauvajot Management Group,Inc. 6/17t% N. Regional Participation The individual Districts and the Districts functioning as a Joint Operation have gained the admiration of other wastewater agencies for their regional initiatives and cooperatively constructed public works. The Districts participate in a wide variety of regional efforts, which include cooperative agreements with the cities that are within the Districts' service area. There are numerous examples of such cooperative efforts and the following sampling will illustrate the participative programs. a Districts Nos. 1 and 2 - Construction of Memory Lane Interceptor in cooperation with the Cities of Santa Ana and Orange. a District No. 7 and Districts Nos. 6 and 14 - These three Districts have implemented joint facilities to handle wastewater flow from Irvine-Newport Beach Business Center. • District No. I I- Service Agreement with the Sunset Beach Sanitary District. • District No. 14 - Design/construction of the Baker-Gisler Interceptor and share of the use of that interceptor. In addition, the Districts have been concerned with the need for water conservation and reclamation. In response to projections of future droughts and water shortages, CSDOC, and Orange County Water District (ORWD) have been evaluating alternatives for increasing local water supplies. lEstorically, these two agencies have had a successful relationship in developing reclaimed water. This is evidenced with the operation of Water Factory 21 and the Green Acres Project. Recently CSDOC and OCWD have begun evaluating a large-scale reclamation project that will produce recycled water primarily for groundwater recharge. The particulars of this project are briefly described below: Orange County Regional Water Reclamation Project (OCR Proiect) Phase I planned as a demonstration project will produce 50,000 acre feet per year of reclaimed water by the year 2000; Phase IL an additional 25,000 acre feet per year by the year 2010;Phase III, an additional 25,000 acre feet per year. The estimated cost of Phase 1 is $167.3 to about $176.2 million. Because this project does not require any purchase of land it is expected to produce water at a competitive cost compared to imported water supplies, ocean desalinization and nonpotable recycled water. The capital costs in 1995 dollars of CSDOC's wastewater treatment and support facilities that are associated with the OCR Project is estimated at $136.0 million for Preferred Alternative 1 which require nitrified/denitrified secondary effluent and reduces CSDOC's wastewater treatment capacity for Phase I of the OCR Project. To obtain support and inform the community, CSDOC and OCWD are developing a community relations program. This will include bill stuffers, community meetings, and various other community outreach and media relations programs. Tie County Savitauon Distna or Orange County Page 32 Prepared By Fad Sauv jot Manage t Group,Inc. 6117/96 Water Conservation The Districts have participated with local water agencies and cities in water conservation programs. These cooperative efforts include a multighased water conservation program designed to be implemented in various stages. The Districts actively foster and promote water conservation to reduce sewage flows by implementing.water conservation programs that emphasize permanent behavioral changes and permanent hardware changes. The Districts have also developed cooperative agreements with other public agencies to provide education, encourage community use of water-saving devices,amend plumbing codes, and other beneficial measures to reduce water usage. The c=w&wuuao Di a of Onmc Comty Page 33 Prepared By Fad Sauvajot Marmsg t GIOUP.Inc 6/17196 4. CONSOLIDATION OF DISTRICTS A. Benefits Expected from Consolidation As was noted earlier in this report, the Districts have joined together ever since the original Districts assumed the responsibilities of the Joint Outfall Sewer Organization (JOS)and later combined their efforts in the Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement (Agreement). As a result, many of the benefits to be obtained from maintaining a centralized and joint administrative and operational structure were achieved over the past decades. Consolidation of the Districts, therefore, is the final phase of a process that began from the outset. 1. Service Area Considerable attention is given at this time to the reduction in the number of governmental agencies with specific interest in limiting the number of specific purpose agencies, such as the Districts. This attention sometimes becomes overly concerned with cutting down agency numbers and fails to recognize the logical arrangements that consolidation should bring. One such concern is the combination that results in an appropriate service area with logical characteristics that bring benefits to the customers. The formation of the Districts was not accidental and considered a wide range of factors. Orange County is served by three(3)regional wastewater agencies: the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, the Ahso Water Management Agency and the Southeast Regional Reclamation Authority. The areas served by the nine Sanitation Districts are contiguous and in many cases share common facilities. All of the nine Districts are members of an agreement which owns and operates two sewage wastewater treatment plants and a common ocean disposal system, all operated by one staff. The Districts include about ninety-percent of the population of Orange County and about two-thirds of the land mass, generally the area north of the City of Lake Forest. The area south of this boundary, i.e., the City of Lake Forest and other cities south of the City of Irvine, are generally referred to as the south county. The south county, which includes about one-third of Orange County's land mass and about ten percent of the population, is served by several wastewater collection and treatment agencies and two regional agencies, the Southeast Regional Reclamation Authority (SERRA) and the Afiso Water Management Agency (AWMA). To the greatest extent, the wastewater collection treatment and disposal agencies within Orange County follow drainage boundaries;to a lesser extents, the agencies follow existing political boundaries. The service area for the nine Sanitation Districts, including the twenty-three northerly cities in the County of Orange are generally tributary to one or both of the Districts' two wastewater treatment plants. That means that the great majority of the wastewater collected for treatment and disposal, about ninety percent of the water, does not have to be pumped to the sewage treatment plants. While the Districts operate twenty-six pumping stations collectively, they pump less than ten percent of the water within the The County Sanitation District of Orange County Page 34 Prepared By Ford Seuajot Managarant Group,Inc 6117/96 service boundary area (The reason for this high gravity flow percentage is that wastewater collected in District No. 14, the City of Irvine, is reclaimed within that city, otherwise it too would be pumped to the Districts' treatment facilities.) The south county is served by AWMA and SERRA which cover the two major drainage courses, Aliso Creek and San Juan Creek. AWMA includes agencies generally tributary to the Aliso Creek drainage area and SERRA covers those agencies generally tributary to San Juan Creek. Each agency operates separate wastewater treatment and disposal facilities. There is a distinct difference between the consolidation of the nine County Sanitation Districts into one Sanitation District and the consolidation of the Districts with the two south county regional agencies. The consolidation of the nine Sanitation Districts is largely an administrative change. The Districts are tributary to and share common treatment and disposal facilities. This is not the case with sewage facilities in the Aliso or San Juan Creek basins. These watersheds are distinctly different and under any organization they would have separate treatment and disposal facilities, thus, they are not as amenable to a joint works organization as the Districts. 2. Financial Beneras As growth occurs, communities will face pressure to provide more resources in terms of staff, wastewater treatment capacity, and infrastructure. In a time where public pressures expect that local governments will restructure to accommodate reduced financial resources, cost avoidance approaches are dominant concerns. Cost avoidance can include reduced financing costs. It is widely known that the cost of borrowing for the financing of essential infrastructure is affected by the credit worthiness of the issue. When several districts combine to issue long-term debt, credit rating agencies are greatly influenced by the so-called `weakest fink." In other words, the district which rates lowest in credit worthiness sets the credit rating level for the entire issue. While this may result in only a few basis points of additional interest costs, the long-term effect can be several hundreds of thousands of dollars over the life of the issue. For example, the difference between an interest cost of 4.50o/a reduced to 4.25% for an issue of$25,000,000 over 20 years can save Tate payers between s420,000 to$790,000,depending on the debt structure. In the past, the Districts have backed their COP issues with letters of credit resulting in AAA ratings. Consolidation may provide an opportunity to evaluate the need for letters of credit for future debt issuances or to obtain such letters at a low cost. 3. Service Standards Standards frequently used to judge service levels include staffing, response capabilities to emergencies, workload, and training. The service delivered generally has a close relationship with what the public perceives to be its needs, what risks are acceptable, and what can be afforded. The service level is particularly affected by population density and geography, but also by community need, personnel,facilities, and fiscal resources. The Districts have placed a high premium on training personnel and the management of human resources. The Fiscal Year 1995-96 budget includes a reorganization establishing The County Sanimum Dlsma of orange County Page 35 Pmpued By Ford Sauvajot Management Group,Inc. 6/I7/96 a Training, Safety and Emergency Response Division within Human Resources. A high level of personnel skills is maintained through consolidation as the overall workforce size allows for adequate cross-training, sufficient organizational depth for back-up, and appropriate job ladders to ensure that jobs are properly matched to the requisite skill levels resulting in a cost-effective workforce distribution. The consolidated District will enhance the already existing integration of wastewater collection systems and the treatment of the wastewater in the Districts' facilities. Consolidation will secure that integration and eliminate the risk that an individual District might withdraw from participation in the Joint Agreement. Such a withdrawal, while unlikely, could reduce the overall efficiency of the remaining Districts. Such an eventuality, however remote, will be eliminated. The consolidation of the Districts into a single entity will provide greater confidence and security to the rate payers. It will remove all doubts regarding the completion of major undertakings of the region's wastewater collection and treatment system. Potential delays and abandonment of major projects due to one or more Districts rescinding a prior approval will be eliminated. The public's perception in the effectiveness of the system will be augmented by the formation of a single governing Board. While the Districts have gained the respect and admiration of other units of local government for thew efficient operation, the governance structure is awkward. Consolidation will streamline the decision-making process and remove cumbersome legislative procedures. 4. Service Reliability A significant advantage to be obtained from consolidation is the formation of a single entity to manage and coordinate regional relationships. The current situation provides for the Districts to represent themselves in regional organizations and combined planning and other efforts as a group cemented together by an agreement. While this has not posed problems of coordination and management in the past, it is nonetheless a structure which can be altered should one or more of the Districts elect to opt out of the agreement. Consolidation would result in having a single agency with adequate local representation on its Board of Directors, to initiate, participate and safeguard regional programs that we in the interest of its customers. It would remove the awkward administrative Board processes currently necessary to carry out joint actions. As a single District, all customers of the nine existing Districts would continue to be assured permanent access to the . treatment capacity of the Districts' facilities. S. Overall Consideration of Benefits From Consolidation The Districts, as presently constituted and organized, possess the most positive characteristics that consolidation would strengthen. Consolidations are most likely to succeed when the following aspects, which are also present in the Districts,exist: (a) similar levels and types of service (b)compatible community identities The Cowty Saaitatim District of O=ge Cowry Page 36 Aepated By Fmd Sauvaja Mwwgeramt Group,lac. 6/17196 (c)geographic proximity (d)political compatibility (e)similar financial sources (f) similar wage and benefit structures (9)joint use of facilities and equipment (h)functional consolidation Consolidation of the Districts, therefore, would solidify the political and administrative structure and functional capacity of the Districts. Benefits already enjoyed by customers that are derived from the joint agreement operations would be ensured for the future. B. Proposed Consolidation Description J. Governance and Oreanizarion The Districts would be consolidated pursuant to California Government Code Section 56839 (a) pertaining to the consolidation or reorganization of districts. The new single unit of government would be a County Sanitation District organized pursuant to California Health and Safety Code Sections 4700 through 4857. The organization and governance of the new District would remain essentially the same as that of the existing Joint Boards of Directors of CSDOC. This would result in a new Board of Directors consisting of 24 or 30 members, depending on the choice made for the Board of Directors' composition. Exhibit No. 8 and No. 9 depict the Director memberships and agencies represented. The CSDOC administrative and operating staff budgeted for Fiscal Year 1995-96 under the direction of the General Manager would become the administrative and operating staff of the newly formed District. The Table of organization is depicted on the following page and is the same as provided for in the CSDOC's Fiscal Year 1995-96 Budget. The consolidation would result in the cessation of ownership and operation of individual District sanitary sewer collection systems. Similarly, there would no longer be separate District ownership and operation of the joint treatment and disposal works. All facilities, sanitary sewer collection systems and Joint Works Facilities would be united into a single wastewater collection and treatment system. Since the existing individual District wastewater collection systems are presently operated and maintained by CSDOC staff as part of the overall wastewater collection and treatment system servicing the territory covered by the nine Districts, there will be no change from the existing operating plan. The Joint Agreement of the Districts (1985 Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement) would be terminated upon the consolidation. Provisions of the Joint Agreement (as amended), however, may be retained as appropriate, by the consolidated District as operating policies and procedures. The Board of Directors of the consolidated District may desire to establish a variety of Board Committees, as presently exists under the Joint Agreement, to consider topics for action by the consolidated District Board of Directors. 2. Service Area The service area of the consolidated District will be the same as that served by the existing nine Districts, or approximately 440 square miles. The service area map is provided as The County Sanitation District of Orange County page 37 Prepamd By Ford Sauvajot Management Group,Inc. 6/17/96 Exhibit 10. Wastewater flows are estimated at approximately 242 MGD (as of 6/30/95). The total population served would be approximately 2.2 million, which would encompass 23 cities in Orange County. 3. Customer Base Orange County population has been steadily growing in past decades and is projected to continue expanding into the future. Table 4.1 illustrates this growth: Table 4.1 Orange County Population Growth Projections 1990 2000 2010 2020 2,424,100 2,866,800 3,104,100 3,306,400 [Source: CSDOC 19951 The population of the consolidated District's service area is projected to grow to 2.7 million by the year 2020. Table 4.2 shows this projection: Table 4.2 Service Area Population Forecast 1990 2000 2010 2020 2,075,000 2,330,000 2,490,000 2,672,000 [Source:CSDOC 19951 Another indicator of service demand may be found in water use. Table 4.3 illustrates this point: Table 4.3 Water Demand (•000's Laaova Per Dry Water-atttaaar Outdoor&Ndnatrdal Procenb o Base Year Forecast Years 1990 2000 2010 2020 Residential 208,451 219,239 228,194 249,426 Non-Residential 76,447 89,044 106,005 125,478 Other 1111 I 12 812 14 142 14 941 Total 296,499 321,095 348,331 389,845 Wastewater(low) 268,500 255,579 285,927 323,837 Wastewater(high) 283,982 317,702 359,823 (Gallons per day estimate) (Source: CSDOC 19951 The County Sanitation District ofOnnge Caoaw Page 38 hepared By Ford Saunpt Maoagem®t Group,Inc. 6117/96 As can be seen from the previous tables, there is a growing need for wastewater collection and treatment. An efficient, effective, and cost effective system is therefore essential. Consolidation of the Districts, which provides for a single Board of Directors will ensure continuation of the maintenance of the current CSDOC high standards while keeping pace with the consolidated District's rising demands for wastewater treatment. 4. Financial Condition Property Tax The financial base of the consolidated District will remain strong. Assessed valuations of taxable property have continued to increase. In Fiscal Year 1985-96 it was $66,883,000,000 compared to $127,396,000,000 for Fiscal Year 1994-95, an increase of over 90o/a, or about 10%per year. Recent increases have been smaller. Property taxes will be collected by the consolidated District in areas previously served by Districts in which such tax was previously levied. The amount collected may be applied to debt service, as is presently the practice of the Districts. Property tax revenues are projected to remain constant as the increases in new development are expected to be offset by a general decline in overall property valuation. Property tax revenues, therefore, are expected to be no less than the present level of $31 million, or about 6.7% of total revenues. The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) has prepared a draft Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide. Of particular concern to the consolidated District would be Principle No. 6, which states: "Special Districts with independent means to raise revenues should not drain property taxes from cities and counties unless the transfer serves appropriate Govemment policy objectives." The report goes on to state that "Special District property taxes have often been used to support voter approved debt. To the extent that values depend on the viability of the district owned and operated infrastructure, their use of property taxes is a reasonable revenue source and provision must be made to ensure security for the repayment of this debt." The California Special District Association has argued that special districts that enhance property wealth should not be excluded from sharing property taxes. As noted earlier in this report, the consolidated District would use property tax to meet debt service on its Certificates of Participation(COPS). If the consolidated District were to lose this revenue source and still maintain the current service levels established by the predecessor Districts, sanitary sewer service charges would need to be increased an average of 48%. Reserves The reserves set aside by the District would become the consolidated District's reserves with the exception of those of District No. 14. Under consolidation, District No. 14 would become a special zone within the consolidated District. Its reserves would be subject to an agreement negotiated in 1995 between the 8 predecessor Districts and District No. 14, providing for IRWD to retain their control. The comprehensive policy regarding reserves would be adopted by the consolidated District. Adequate reserves 3Te Cawty Sanitation District of Orange Cowry Page 39 Prepared By Ford Seuvajot Mariegemrnt Group,Inc. 6117/96 have been budgeted in Fiscal Year 1995-96 and would continue to be in future years in keeping with the reserve policy. Please refer to Section 3.1,of this report. Insurance The consolidated District would continue to be self-insured (as the Districts now are) for workers' compensation, property damage and general liability. The self-insurance portion of workers' compensation would be $250,000 per person per occurrence with outside excess insurance coverage to the statutory limit. The self-insured portion for property damage coveting fire, flood, and other perils would be $25,000 per occurrence with outside excess insurance coverage to $200 million for flood, fire and other perils. The self-insured portion for property damage covering earthquakes would be $250,000 or 5% per unit of insurance, whichever is greater, with outside insurance coverage to$30 million. The District would maintain outside comprehensive boiler and machinery insurance with a $100 million per occurrence combined limit with deductibles ranging from $25,000 to $100,000. The District would also be completely self-insured for general liability coverage. Insurance coverages would be reviewed and determined by the Board of Directors annually and would be subject to change. Liabilities There are no unrecorded claims as of June 30, 1995 against the Districts that would materially affect the financial position of the new consolidated District. Receivables It should be noted that the Districts had deposited Districts' funds in the Orange County Investment Pool (OCIP). On December 6, 1994, the County of Orange and the Orange County Investment Pool (OCIP) filed Chapter 9 bankruptcy as a result of a $2.02 billion investment loss suffered by OCIP. On the bankruptcy date, the Districts' was the second largest external depositor within the pool with S454 million invested. Because the Treasurer of the County of Orange served as the Districts' Treasurer, all of the Districts' operating funds and idle reserves were invested within OCIP. The Districts' and other depositors reached a Comprehensive Settlement Agreement with the County that was approved by the United States Bankruptcy Court on May 2, 1995. Under the terms of the agreement, the Districts received cash in the approximate amount of 77% of its investment balance as of December 6, 1994, together with certain notes and claims against the County for the balance of its investment, less approximately 1% to 2% withheld be certain brokers pending resolution of litigation. In return, the Districts released all litigation claims against the County and assigned all OCIP participant related claims against third parties to the County. On May 19, 1995, the Districts received a cash distribution that, together with previously released emergency withdrawals, approximated 77% of their December 6, 1994 investment balance. On June 19, 1995, the Districts received another 3% through proceeds of recovery notes sold in the public market by the County. Of the remaining The Carty Saonaaua Disaia orOnmp Carty Page 40 PMzmd By Fotd Saunjot Maaagemmt G W.1oc. 6/17/96 20% of the Districts' December 6, 1994 investment balance still owed by the County, 90/6 is to be repaid through the "Settlement Secured Claims" and 11% through `Repayment Claims," both issued by the County. The "Settlement Secured Claims" are secured by a first-priority security interest on 65% of net litigation proceeds recovered by the County through third-party defendants. The`Repayment Claims"are secured by a second-priority security interest on 65% of litigation recoveries by the County from third-party defendants. Due to uncertainty of when the remaining investment balances owed will be repaid by the County, the Districts' have recorded a $96 million long term receivable on their June 30, 1995 Balance Sheet. On May 15, 1996, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court approved a "Joint Agreement of the County of Orange, the Official Investment Pool Participants Committee, and each Option A Pool Participant(including the Districts). Under the terms of the Agreement, the May 2, 1995 Comprehensive Settlement Agreement was modified in several respects affecting the Districts. The Districts, by signing, agreed to approve the County's Plan of Adjustment, and the Settlement Claims and Repayment Claims became non-recourse against the County. The Districts' recovery of the balances owing them will have to rely solely upon the proceeds of litigation against third parties, such as brokers. However, the Districts' position improves by being provided priority over any recovery that can be realized by the County. 5. Facilities. Fixed and Other Assets Consolidation would result in all assets of existing Districts to be transferred at book value, less accumulated depreciation, to the new consobdated District. The current valuation of these assets is $1,282,828,326. (as of June 30, 1995). District No. 14 The Districts formed Sanitation District No. 14 as a result of a negotiated Agreement between the Districts and Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) as of July 1, 1985. Pursuant to the Agreement, IRWD paid the Districts $34,532,000 for an initial 15,000,000 gallons per day capacity in the Districts' joint treatment facilities (with an ultimate collection capacity of 32,000,000 gallons per day) together with a pro-rata interest in real property based on flow of 32,000,000 gallons per day. The book value of the assets purchased by IRWD was determined to be $14,553,000 as of June 30, 1986. The excess of the purchase price over the assets' book value of$19,979,000 at June 30, 1986 is being amortized over the remaining 30-year useful fives of the joint assets of District No. 14. As of June 30, 1995, $5,919,381 of the excess of purchase price over the assets' book value was amortized. IRWD entered into a separate agreement with District No. 14 whereby IRWD agreed to annually fund payment of District No. 14's proportionate share of the District's joint capital outlay revolving fund budget requirements and certain capital improvements during the tern of the agreement,which contribution amounted to$6,942,916 in 1994-1995. The Come,Sanitation District of Or age Comty Page 41 Prepared By Ford Sauvajot Management Group,Inc. 6117/96 In November 1995 the Districts amended the Agreement with District No. 14 regarding the method of calculating District No. 14's share of capacity in the Joint Treatment Facilities. District No. 14 paid forjoint works capital costs based upon a flow of 15 MGD. This rate was negotiated in 1986. At that time, IRWD projected that its flow would reach 32 MGD within the decade. This has not been the case. Their monthly flows have never exceeded 15 MGD and have exceeded 10 MGD only eight tittles in the last three years. Their average flows have been 6.3 MGD. The Amendment provides that District No. 14 pay based upon the actual average flow per day for the highest four months, providing capacity for higher winter flows. District No. 14 would come into compliance with Districts' reserve policies. Proceeds from the resultant incremental sale of District No. 14's share of joint works capital facilities to other Districts will be used to satisfy reserve policy requirements, with any excess used to fund future District No. 14's funding requirements. The impact of this revision is that it shifts slightly more operating costs to the other Districts. Under consolidation, District No. 14 would cease to exist and this amendment would remain in force for MIND to pay District No. 14's costs to the new consolidated District. Under the proposed consolidation, all predecessor District obligations and rights would remain in force. Consolidation of the Districts into a single successor County Sanitation District would have no adverse effect on pre-existing agreements between the eight Districts and District No. 14. Accordingly,the current agreement pertaining to the application of IRWD credits and use of reserves would retrain in force. Exhibit 13 depicts the IRWD Credits and Reserves as they would be applicable under all consolidation scenarios to the Operating Funds and COP service, Capital Improvement Funds, and the Liability and Catastrophe Reserves. The Credits and Reserves are presented in two versions - with and without duck pond wet weather Flow Diversion. Cash and Investments The Districts fo8ow the practice of pooling cash and investments of all funds except for cash held by trustees and amounts in the Districts' deferred compensation plan. Therefore, all cash and investments are currently centrally managed. Upon consolidation, the pooled cash and investments would become the cash and investments of the consolidated District. It is not contemplated that current investment policies and practices would be changed. Please refer to Section IL of this report for details on reserve accounts. 6. Brdeer The Districts' Fiscal Year 1996-97 approved operating and capital budgets would become the consolidated District's operating financial plan for Fiscal Year 1996-97. It contains, among other financial objectives, the fiscal policies that would be adopted by the new District. The County Sanitation District of Orange County Page 42 Prepared By Ford Sauvajot Management Oruup.Inc 6117196 In addition to the details of the operating budget, it contains the Capital Improvement Program with projected expenditures for capital construction, reserve requirements, bond interest and principal redemption requirements,and other items of fiscal importance. Exhibit l I is the existing "All Districts Summary" for the Operating Fund, Capital Facilities Fund, Construction/COP Fund and G.O. Bond and Interest Fund. 7. Caoitnb Program The Districts' Joint Works Capital Improvements budget has been prepared under assumptions included in the 30-year Facilities and Expansion Master Plan ("2020 Vision" approved by the Joint Boards of Directors in 1989). It will continue to provide the basis for capital improvements planning and construction for the consolidated District until such time as strategic planning products modify the 1989 Master Plan. It should be noted that decreased flows, the poor economic climate and a revised vision of infrastructure needs will likely cause original projections contained on the 1989 Master Plan to be scaled back. It is also noted that the Districts are currently engaged in updating the 1989 Master Plan and in comprehensive strategic planning. Preliminary estimates indicate that up to $200 million may be reduced in the 10-year Capital Improvement Program. 8. Lone Term Indebtedness The outstanding long-term debt of the Districts will not be assumed by the consolidated District. Exhibit 6 details the Districts' long-term indebtedness. It is the intention of the Districts to establish special zones upon consolidation to continue differential user fees and to ensure that Districts' outstanding debt is serviced by only those residents who originally assumed that debt. The boundaries of each zone will be the same as those of each predecessor District. The new consolidated District will establish nine(9)zones to differentiate and account for costs, revenues and liabilities of the existing Districts. Such zones would have boundaries the same as those of each predecessor District. In addition, an Improvement District (ID) would be formed coincident with each existing District's service area to enable proper segregated accounting for the retirement of the existing Certificates of Participation (COPS) debt. As new firture borrowing is implemented, new ID's would be formed to include the service area benefiting from the projects. In this manner, therefore, each zone would continue to be responsible for only their project. For projects at the treatment plants, however, an ID to include all of the existing service areas would be formed to properly allocate the cost of such improvements that would be used by all the zones. It is also expected that the consolidated District would continue the practice of dedicating Ad Valorem Taxes where it would be collectable within a zone to the retirement of long-term debt of an appropriate ID. C. Proposed Plan of Services Under consolidation the operation of the new District would remain the same as the current operations of CSDOC. The principal reason is that the Districts presently operate in a consolidated fashion pursuant to the provisions in the Health and Safety Code Section 4840 et seq. The County Smimum District of Orange Cowry Page 43 Prepared By Ford Sauvajot Management Group,Inc. 6117196 Designation of Services The existing Districts"Mission Statement"best exemplifies their operating philosophy which would become the consolidated District's own: "To protect public health, and air, land and water resources by planning, designing, constructing, operating and maintaining a reliable, safe and cost-effective wastewater collection, treatment and disposal system that meets the needs of the users we serve and complies with federal, state and local regulations. " The consolidated District would carry out its function through the existing Joint Operation departments. The principal functional units and Fiscal Year 1995-96 expenditures were budgeted as follows: Fiscal Year 1995-96 General Manager's Department $1,638,400 Human Resources Department 1,423,000 Finance Department 3,352,300 Information Technology Department 1,551,600 Maintenance Department 15,120,700 Operations Department 24,199,300 Technical Services Department 10,109,800 Engineering Department 784,900 Total $58,180,000 Revenue (3,800,000) Net Operating Expenses $54,380,000 The county Sanitation District of Orsnge county Page.µ Prepared By Ford Sauvejot Mattoganent Group,Inc. 6/17/96 5. TIME TABLE TO IMPLEMENT CONSOLIDATION A. Implementation Approach Consolidation of the Districts is proposed to be accomplished under Government Code Section 56839(a)which states: If a majority of the members of each of the legislative bodies of two or more local agencies adopt substantially similar resolutions of application making proposals either for the consolidation of districts or for the reorganization of all or any part of the districts into a single local agency, the commission [LAFC01 shall approve, or conditionally approve, the proposal The commission shall authorize the Board of Supervisors to order the consolidation or reorganization without an election, except as otherwise provided in subdivision (b)of Section 57081. Section 57801(b)states, in part: An election shall be held if the conducting authority finds either of the following: (1) In the case of inhabited territory, that a petition requesting that the proposal be submitted to confirmation by the voters has been signed by either of the following: (A) At least 25 percent of the number of landowners within the territory subject to the consolidation or reorganization who own at least 25 percent of the assessed value of land within the territory. (B) At least 25 percent of the voters entitled to vote as a result of residing within, or owning land within, the territory. The initial step for consolidation, therefore, is the preparation of a resolution by each of the Districts petitioning LAFCO for the consolidation of the nine Districts into one. In the event that there is not a unanimous agreement among the nine Districts, the organizational entity would be two or more of the Districts. B. Time Table The estimated time table to complete consolidation of the Districts is approximately the end of March, 1997, This is based on the following schedule of events and dates: February 1996 Completion of Draft Consultant Report Staff analysis regarding consolidation May 1996 Completion of Final Consultant Report Review and Discussion of Staff Consolidation by Joint Boards of Directors 7Le Comry Sanitation District oforaage Cowry Page 45 Prepared By Ford Saunjot Management Group,Inc. 6/17196 June- September 1996 Joint Boards Review of Final Consultant Report and Staff Report; Authorization to Proceed with Application to LAFCO October 1996 Each District Adopts Resolution of Intention to Consolidate * November 1996 Filing of Application with LAFCO December-January 1997 Review of Application by LAFCO February 1997 LAFCO schedules Public Hearing March 1997 Approved Application by LAFCO • Jf the Joint Boards of Directors choose to act more rapld(v, the LIFCO application and review process could be accomplished earlier. The County Saoaetion District of orange County Page 46 Prepared By Ford Seuvajot Management Gmup,Inc. 6/17/96 6. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. Recommendation It is recommended that the nine Sanitation Districts be consolidated into a single successor County Sanitation District. This section discusses the bases for the recommendation and describes various other matters for information. B. Key Elements Concerning the Proposed Consolidation Recommendation of the formation of a County Sanitation District as the successor entity consolidating the nine Sanitation Districts retains the flexibility enjoyed by the Districts. It also provides for adequate representation on the new Board of Directors for the rate payers. The Districts have worked well under a County Sanitation District organization form for many years and are accustomed to operating within the broad authority available under the statutes. Consolidation of the nine Sanitation Districts into one successor County Sanitation District would continue current practice of revenue collection and maintain, without any changes, the relationships and legal obligations regarding the predecessor eight Sanitation Districts and Sanitation District No. 14. This would be accomplished by the establishment of special zones within the successor Sanitation District to reflect the continuation of differential user rates and the collection and use of property taxes. The statutes under which the new Sanitation District would be formed allow for the establishment of special zones to provide for differential user rates and the charging of capital improvement costs only to those who benefit from those improvements. As a consequence of consolidation, therefore, rate payers in each of the predecessor Sanitation Districts would not assume any existing indebtedness of other Districts and would retain their present sanitary sewer service charges. Fees would be reviewed and adopted annually by the Board of Directors and would be subject to revision. All obligations negotiated by the Districts and District No. 14 would remain in force. Specifically, a) the same terms and conditions of the November 1995 agreement would continue after consolidation; b) zones would be formed in the new District to pay debt service for existing debt issues and property taxes would be assigned to each zone as appropriate; Therefore, there would be no financial obligation of other predecessor Districts imposed on Irvine Ranch Water District (IltWD), as District No. 14 is consolidated with the other eight; and c) IRWD reserves, which are also subject to the November 1995 Agreement, would be used only for IRWD needs. Because of the complex relationships that exist between the eight Sanitation Districts and Sanitation District No. 14, the following section is presented to clarify how those relationships would remain after consolidation. The County Sanitation Disui t of Orange County Page 47 Prepared By Ford Sauvajot Management Getup,Inc. 6/17/96 C. District No. 14 District No. 14 presents unique conditions which would be addressed at the time of consolidation. As was reported in previous sections of this report, unlike the other 8 Sanitation Districts, District No. 14's share of costs is paid by the IRWD rather than directly by customers. IRWD charges its residents and other customers for the costs of District No. 14. Prior to the time that District No. 14 was formed, IRWD had executed on March 13, 1985, an agreement with the eight Sanitation Districts (not including No. 14 at the time) for providing the funding necessary for District No. 14 (under formation at the time) to acquire ownership interests in the facilities and real property of the Districts; and to fund, in the future, the proportionate share of the Districts' plus District No. 14's budget for capital expenditures and operations and maintenance costs. IRWD also agreed to convey to District No. 14 its previously acquired and owned rights to 15 MOD capacity in the Districts' ocean outfall facility. Concurrently, District No. 14 conveyed the 15 MOD capacity to the eight Sanitation Districts. The January 1, 1986 "Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Capacity Rights in Treatment, Disposal and Sewer Facilities" (Agreement) between the Districts (not including District No. 14) and the new District No. 14 provided for the Districts (not including No. 14) to convey and sell to District No. 14 a 15 MOD capacity in the Joint Works Treatment Facilities for $31,293,000. In addition, District No. 14 acquired interest in the Districts' real property in an amount valued at $4,653,000. On February 13, 1986, District No. 14 entered into an"Agreement Between Irvine Ranch Water District and County Sanitation District No. 14 Acquiring Ownership Interests, Assigning Rights and Establishing Obligations." This agreement, which pertains to IRWD's funding of District No. 14's obligations with the Districts, stipulated that in the event of termination within five years of the January 1, 1986 agreement between District No. 14 and CSDOC, IRWD would be paid back for its funding of District No. 14's purchase of treatment capacity, real estate interest, and reserve funds, i.e., $31,293,000. However, IRWD would not acquire any right or title to the Joint Works Treatment Facilities. Moreover, District No. 14 will reconvey to IRWD the 15 MGD capacity rights in CSDOC's ocean outfall facilities. This agreement no longer applies as the time has elapsed for the provisions to be enacted. The January 1, 1986 Agreement has recently been amended by District No. 14 and CSDOC (November 1995) and would remain in force under consolidation. (Please refer to Section 4.B.5 of this report.) Based on the foregoing Agreement's provisions, it is concluded that the Districts have no financial obligations to IRWD regarding any interests in treatment plant capacity and real estate purchased from the Districts by District No. 14. This conclusion is reached on the basis that District No. 14,upon consolidation with the other 8 Districts,would continue to serve the wastewater collection and treatment needs of IRWD unchanged from the existing condition. Further, the new consolidated District would combine all the Districts' assets, including those of District No. 14. Based on the Agreement, the time has expired during which the repurchase of real property and assets may have been of consideration. The County Sanitation District of Croup County Page 48 Prepared By Ford Sauniot Management Group.Inc. &I r196 It is, therefore, feasible to consolidate District No. 14 along with the other 8 Districts. It is also noted that District No. 14 executed on February 11, 1987, a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD). The MOU provides,in part, as follows: Section 3: Fees Charges and Invoicing Procedures. A. All sewer user rates and charges established by IRWD to be imposed within the boundaries of IRWD's service area for use of its facilities, shall be established by IRWD from time to time on its sole discretion. B. IRWD and la require that each discharger issued a permit (hereinafter "Permittee')pursuant to IRWD's and 14's Ordinances, procedures and this Memorandum of Understanding, to discharge wastewater into la's facilities, shall pay its reasonably proportionate share of all costs of providing service by CSDOC. To implement this requirement. IRWD and 14 shall each,from time to time, in the sole discretion of each and in accordance with procedures required by Slate and Federal regulations and permits issued to CSDOC and IRWD pursuant thereto, adopt permit fees, sewer use rates and charges, including fees and penallies for non-compliance with permit conditions or its respective Ordinance, and take the required actions to levy said fees, rates and charges on all such Permittees for the use of its facilities. C 14 shall regularly hrvoice IRWD for those permit fees, sewer use charges, or non-compliance fees, all as described in Section 3B above, incurred by Permiltees within 14. User charges will be assessed to IRWD on the basis of . wastewater delivered by IRWD to 14 at every point of connection between IRWD and IJ fdciltltes. IRWD shall pay said invoices in full within forty-five (45)days of the invoice dates. D. IRWD shall be responstble for promptly invoicing Permitrees within 14 for the fees and charges adopted by 14 and for collecting same. E 14 and IRWD will work together to complete the billing mud collection process. Should a Permittee fail to pay any permit fee or non-compliance fees, IRWD will pursue collection through its routine procedures, including termination of water and or sewer service, if appropriate, and shall notify 14 to initiate Permit revocation when necessevy. It is anticipated that this MOU would form the basis for a similar protocol to be executed by IRWD and the newly consolidated District. Two factors which make District No. 14 different from other Districts are: 1. The Irvine Ranch Water District funds all of District No. 14's financial requirements with the Districts. Z. The Irvine Ranch Water District also operates a wastewater treatment plant and flows to the Districts'Joint Works Facilities are controlled by IRWD. It is not expected that consolidation would change either of those. The C0=W Sanitauw Disuict ofOnnge Cowtv Page;g PreWted By Ford Sauvajon Management Group,Inc. Page In November 1995 by the eight Sanitation Districts and District No. 14 renegotiating the "Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Capacity Rights in Treatment, Disposal and Sewer Facilities." Under the terms of the amendment to the agreement, District No. 14 would pay for its joint works capital costs based upon the actual average flow per day for the highest four months, providing capacity for higher winter flows. This amendment, in essence, brings District No. 14 more in line with the method of payment for expenses incurred by the Districts Capital Outlay Revolving Fund (CORF) budget and Annual Integration Adjustment. For the past 10 years (i.e., since the formation of District No. 14), District No. 14 has been paying for its share of CORF on 15 MOD flow(the amount estimated at the time of formation). Flow from District No. 14 has been substantially less overall but has ranged widely from summer to winter due to IRWD's summer diversion of reclaimed water from its plant for agricultural use. Current plans of IRWD include diverting about 5 MOD to duck ponds during the winter. This change in the method of payment makes for a more equitable calculation for IRWD's operations and maintenance costs in the Districts' facilities. Preliminary discussions with the LAFCO staff have received thew support for the formation of special zones within the proposed consolidated District to continue the differentiation of user fees and the repayment of existing outstanding debt. Consequently, there is no anticipated opposition to a consolidation proposal that would keep in place current Districts' practices regarding revenue collection and allocation of those revenues to benefiting areas as appropriate. D. Estimated Savinas Consolidation of the Districts is projected to produce annual operating savings on the order of$120,000 based on the Fiscal Year 1995-96 budget. These savings break down as follows: Administration $55,000 Legal Services 5,000 Board Costs 10,000 Accounting Costs 50 000 Estimated Total $120,000 (annualized) E. Consolidation of Districts without District No. 14 The Districts, as a matter of policy, may want to consolidate without District No. 14. Exploring this option suggests three scenarios for consolidation without District No. 14. Each of the scenarios is discussed below and assumes that the mutual benefits enumerated in 1985 accruing to the Districts and to IRWD from the formation of District No. 14 still exist today. In other words, even though the consolidation could exclude District No. 14, there would be a continued dependence by IRWD to obtain wastewater treatment and disposal from the consolidated District. The Cmaty Sanitation D and of Orange Comm Page So Pmparad By Ford Sauvaiot Mmaganmt Coup,Inc. 6117/96 Scenario 1 Under this scenario, District No. 14 would remain as an independent County Sanitation District. To continue the present use of the Districts' facilities after their consolidation would not require renegotiating the terms of the agreements that are presently in force. Changes to those agreements would merely require the renaming of the Districts as the new consolidated District. Under consolidation, the new District is expected to honor prior agreements. The terms of the recently amended "Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Capacity Rights in Treatment, Disposal and Sewer Facilities" (November 1995) would remain in force. This would secure for IRWD treatment capacity. District No. 14 would secure its facility and treatment/disposal requirements through a "service contract" with the new consolidated District. This would not be a Joint Operating Agreement (JOA). The new consolidated District, however, may not be comfortable with District No. 14 having an equity ownership share of its facilities and real property based on mutually agreed payments for those services based on wastewater flows. Therefore, revisions of the terms of current agreements between the new consolidated District and District No. 14 may be deemed advisable. Such a "service contact"would not give District No. 14 an equity ownership in the new District's facilities and real property. The present "Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Capacity Rights in Treatment, Disposal and Sewer Facilities," as amended, is somewhat unclear as to the extent of entitlement to which District No. 14 may be reimbursed for capacity ownership in the Districts' capital facilities and real property. Operating practices of the Districts and the terms negotiated to the most recent amendment to this agreement by the Districts and District No. 14 indicate that each District has an equity share in the Districts' capital facilities and real estate. The amendment, among other terms, provides that the proceeds from the sale of District No. 14's share of joint works capital facilities to other Districts (due to lowering District No. 14's costs based on reduced flows) will be used to satisfy reserve policy requirements of the Districts. The Districts would repurchase District No. 14's ownership interests pursuant to provisions in the current"Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement." The impact on the proposed new consolidated District, if District No. 14 were excluded, would be a reduction in the number of members to the Board of Directors (reduced by 1 director). None of the Directors of District No. 14 would serve on the newly consolidated District Board of Directors. The service area for the new District would decrease by about 92 square miles. However, services would be provided to this territory through a "service contract." Therefore, the new District's work program and budget would not be affected. There would be no impact on the proposed plan of service. Under this scenario, IRWD's service area customers are unaffected by the consolidation of the other eight Sanitation Districts. Treatment capacity and associated costs continue to be furnished and based on the existing agreements negotiated between the former eight predecessor Sanitation Districts (which under this scenario are now a single consolidated District) and District No. 14. Renegotiation of some of the terms of existing contracts could result in District No. 14 no longer having an equity interest in real estate and facilities owned by the consolidated District. District No. 14 would be compensated over 7Te County Sanitation Dinner of Orange County Page 51 Prepared By Ford Sauva)m Management Group,Inc. 6/17M time for currently owned assets pursuant to terms and conditions enumerated in existing agreements. LAFCO is likely to find a lack of compelling reasons to consider this scenario. Rather than streamlining decision-making and improving governance, this scenario retains governmental structures that do not bring benefits which would be unavailable under complete consolidation of the nine Districts. Scenario 2 Under the second scenario, a variation of Scenario No. 1, District No. 14 would continue to function as an independent county sanitation district. The other eight Districts would consolidate into a single District, similarly as in scenario I above. The newly formed District and District No. 14 would enter into a "Joint Operation Agreement" (JOA) pursuant to Section 4840 of the California Health and Safety Code. This "Joint Operation" would be similar to the `Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement" currently joining the existing nine Districts into a combined administrative, operation and maintenance organization. District No. 14 would remain a separate and distinct sanitation district as would also the newly consolidated District. The composition of the resulting Joint Boards of Directors would include the directors of the new District and the directors of District No. 14. Provisions contained in the present agreements between the existing eight Districts and District No. 14 would remain in force as the obligations of the eight Districts would be transferred to the new District upon consolidation. Because District No. 14 would, concurrent with the consolidation of the eight Districts into a new single District, enter into a "Joint Operation Agreement" with the new consolidated District, there would not be any necessity for the new District to repurchase treatment capacity and real property interests from District No. 14. The impact on the proposed new consolidated District would be a reduction in the number of members to its Board of Directors (reduced by 1). None of the Directors of District No. 14 would serve on the new consolidated District's Board of Directors. However, they would serve on the"Joint Boards of Directors" as noted above. The service area of the new District would be decreased by about 92 square miles, but the area served by the JOA would be similar to the present area served by the nine Districts. There would be no change to District No. 14's territory. Services to District No. 14's territory would be provided through the"Joint Operation" agreement. There would be no change, therefore, in the proposed plan of services. Under this scenario, IRV D's service area customers are unaffected by the consolidation. In fact, it is an exact continuation of the manner in which services are currently provided through the JOA with the eight Sanitation Districts. Agreements would remain in force as they presently exist. LAFCO is likely to find this scenario also lacking in compelling reasons to support it. This scenario appears to offer no additional benefits to customers while not fully implementing some of the principal objectives of consolidation - i.e., simplifying decision-making The Cowtv sanitation District of Omnge County Page 52 Prepared By Ford Sauvajot Management Group,Inc. 6/17/96 processes and administrative procedures, improving governance, etc. LAFCO may also find objectionable formation of a Joint Boards of Directors for the JOA giving disproportionate representation to District No. 14. Scenario Under a third scenario, District No. 14 would be dissolved and the territory established as a special zone within IRWD. There would be no change in the boundaries of the zone from those of District No. 14. This scenario would require IRWD to enter into a "service contract" with the new consolidated District. The terms and conditions of the contract would be consistent with the existing treatment of wastewater flow Agreements from IRWD. Dissolution of District No. 14 would require the newly consolidated District to repurchase District No. 14's capacity ownership in the Joint Works Facilities and the real property interest. Dissolution could also result in the reconveying to IRWD District No 14's previously acquired rights to 15 MGD capacity in the Districts' ocean outfall facilities. All these asset considerations, however, would be addressed in the negotiation of new "service agreements" to the mutual benefits of the newly consolidated District's and the IRWD's customers. The intent would be to continue the terms and conditions of existing agreements to all possible extents. The impact on the newly consolidated District would be similar to that occurring under Scenario No. 1 above. The District's territory would be reduced by about 92 square miles and the Board of Directors by 1 member. None of the Directors of District No. 14 would serve on the newly consolidated District Board of Directors. The budget and service level would remain the same as the effective service area would be unchanged, with a portion to be served through a contract. There would be no impact on the proposed plan of service. Under this scenario, IRWD's service area customers are unaffected by the consolidation. All existing service agreements to treat the wastewater flow from IRWD would be renegotiated to provide similar terms and conditions that presently exist. There would be a cost to the new consolidated District for the repurchase of real property and other property interests presently owned by District No. 14. Additionally, certainty of providing wastewater treatment to IRWD's in future years may be lessened. Similarly, access to the consolidated District's wastewater facilities by IRWD may be reduced. LAFCO is likely to find this scenario to be an incomplete solution to improving governance and ensuring long-term service reliability for IRWD. While it does not increase the number of policy-making bodies in the region,it has the appearance of having the potential to break down regional planning efforts and managerial controls of an important public utility. Its decision-making structure will likely complicate regional coordination. Recommendation It is recommended that the Districts consolidate with the inclusion of District No. 14. More than 10 years ago it was determined that a number of benefits would be derived The County Sanctum Uisaict of Orwe Comb page 53 6/17/96 prepared By Ford Saumot Mwagc t Oroup.Inc. from the formation of District No. 14 and its joining the then existing g Districts in ajoint operation. Those benefits included the determination that it was in the best interest of the residents and property owners of CSDOC and District No. 14 to allow for District No. 14's participation and ownership in the joint treatment and disposal facilities of CSDOC. By such agreement, District No. 14 did not need to build a sewage treatment plant and ocean outfall. There is ample evidence that those benefits exist today. Consolidation with District No. 14 would accelerate the normalization of its relationship to the other Districts, a process which has been reinforced by the recent negotiation of District No. 14's costs on a basis more consistent with the method utilized by CSDOC for all of its other Districts. There are no advantages to be expected from the exclusion of District No. 14 from a consolidation of the Districts. In fact, there could be a need to repurchase and/or reconvey assets that may result in unnecessary expenses to rate payers. Finally, excluding District No. 14 would accomplish only a partial consolidation when existing circumstances are conducive and cost effective to accomplish a total consolidation. None of the scenarios above offer improvements over the recommended approach. Scenario 2 offers the least favorable conditions to accomplish the consolidation of the Districts. This scenario negates most of the consolidation goals relating to simplifying decision-making processes and administrative procedures, and bringing greater unity to managerial control and regional planning efforts. It should be expected that LAFCO will not consider any of these options as improvements over current conditions. F. Governance Alternatives The Joint Boards of Directors may select either Section 4730 or 4730.1 of the California Health and Safety Code to structure the Board of Directors of the newly consolidated District. The choice affects the participation of water districts which is authorized under 4730.1 but excluded under 4730, California Government Code Section 56030 states: " "Consolidation"means that the uniting or joining of two or more cities located in the same county into a single new successor city or two or more districts into a single new successor district. In the case of consolidation of special districts, all of those districts shall have been formed pursuant to the same principal act. " The principal act which formed the Districts is the County Sanitation District Act, California Health and Safety Code, Section 4700 et. seq. The Districts, with the exception of District No. 14, were formed pursuant to Section 4730 which provides, in par, regarding the governing body's composition as follows: 4730. Board ei Directors•members sanitary district defined "The governing body of a sanitation district is a board of directors of not less that three members. The presiding officer of the goveming body of each city, the whole or part of which is included in the sanitation district, is a member of the board A member of the governing body of each sanitary district, the whole or part of which is included in the sanitation district, is a member of the board no County Sanitation District of Orange County Page 54 Prepared By Ford Sauvajot Management Group,Inc. 6/17/96 "7f the sanitation district includes territory which is unincorporated and nor included in a sanitary district, then the presiding officer of the county board of supervisors is a member of the board... "The term "saidurry district"as used in this section shall mean a sanitary district formed prior to the formation of the sanitation district itn which it is included in whole or in pare " District No. 14 was formed pursuant to Section 4730.1 of the County Sanitation District Act. This section of the Health and Safety Code provides, in part, regarding the composition of the Sanitation District's governing body as follows: 4730.1 Composition ol'Governing Bodv Contents of resolution and order. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 4730, the resolution of intention to form, the district and the order of formation of the district may provide that the governing body of the sanitation district shall be constituted in accordance with this section. Number of members. The governing body of a sanitation district is a board of directors composed of an odd number of not less than three(3) members... District with territory in city or other district. /f the district includes territory which is within a city or other sanitation district or public agency, the board of directors shall be composed of the presiding officers of the governing body of each city, other sanitation district and public agency and the chairman of the county board of supervisors. If the chairman of the county board of supervisors and the presiding officer of the governing body of each such city, sanitation district and public agency constitute an even number, a member of the county board of supervisors appointed by said board of supervisors shall be a member of the baud of directors of the district. Dest m�tion of members in absence of regular member. The governing body of each county, city, sanitation district and public agency having a representadve an said board of directors may designate one of its members to act in the place of its regular member in his absence, inability or refusal to act. Public Agency defined "Public agency" as used in this section means any sanitary district, public utility district, resort district, county water district, municipal water district, sewer maintenance district or county maintenance district, engaged in the collection, transportation, treatment and disposal of sewage or any other public agency empowered to and engaged in the collection, transportation, treatment or disposal of sewage. " Based on the foregoing sections, the new successor saritation district may be formed pursuant to either Section 4730 or 4730.1. Formation pursuant to Section 4730 would result in a board of directors smaller than the existing Joint Boards of Directors (24 members). Section 4730.1 would increase the membership of the board of directors. It is estimated that 30 members would be eligible to serve because 3 water districts would have The County Saniumen District of Orange County Page 55 Prepmad By Ford Sauvajot Management Group,Inc. 6/17196 memberships on the board of directors and three additional cities (without wastewater service) would be added. There is merit in the use of Section 4730.1 to structure its new Board of Directors because of the increasing regional participation of the Districts in water reclamation and conservation. This was observed in section 3.N of this report. The long-term need for added water sources and conservation is well documented. The need for reclamation as a water source is based on a predicted increase in water demand, and the absence of future large scale, new water development projects. It is difficult to see how future southern California water needs will be met without water reclamation and conservation. Water reclamation is not inexpensive due to the treatment costs required to meet the State of California, Department of Health Services' requirements and distribution system costs. However, past history has repeatedly demonstrated that what initially appears to be high development costs ultimately prove to be very economical projects compared to other alternatives. For many years, the Districts and Orange County Water District (OCWD) have cooperated to develop water reclamation projects. Water Factory 21 produces high quality water used to maintain a groundwater barrier against seawater intrusion. The Green Acres Project provides a reclaimed water source for landscape irrigation in coastal areas. Over the last five years, the Districts and OCWD have jointly studied the development of water reclamation plants at several sites. In addition, the Districts have cooperated in water conservation programs with water agencies. The inclusion of water districts on the consolidated Board of Directors would provide perspective to wastewater treatment and use of reclaimed water for groundwater recharge, agricultural irrigation, and other beneficial purposes to reduce increasing demands on imported water. It could facilitate the sharing of capital, operations and maintenance cost between the newly consolidated District and water districts seeking to augment their water supplies through reclamation efforts. As members on the Board of Directors, representation of water districts would confirm the new consolidated District's commitment to water reclamation and regional water conservation efforts. G. Sanitary Sewer Service Charees and Special Zones The Districts currently charge different sewer service rates. This is largely due to several factors: • Share in construction costs based on wastewater flows; • Availability of property tax revenues; • Different property tax rates; • Different operations and maintenance expenses;and • Geography. It is the intention of the Districts to form special zones pursuant to Section 4850 et. seq. of the Health and Safety Code following consolidation of the Districts. In this manner the The Cowry Sanitation District of orange Cowry Page 56 Prepared By Ford Sauvajot Managenreat Group,Inc. 6/17196 Districts would maintain current user rates throughout the new consolidated District to reflect differential costs of service due to local circumstances or geography. The Districts, therefore, would be consolidated and retain current customer rate structures. There would be no change from the current practices of determining sanitary sewer service charges and no potential hardship on rate payers would result from consolidation. All fees, therefore, would be reviewed annually by the Board of Directors and would be subject to revision. The Districts currently charge Class III industrial/commercial user fees ranging from $703 to $1,037 per million gallons. These industrial/commercial user fees would remain unchanged due to consolidation, as they would be included in the separate zones. Sanitary sewer service charges would be reviewed and adopted annually by the Board of Directors based upon need, and may be revised. It is recommended that the consolidated District establish special zones, as authorized by Section 4850 et seq. of the Health and Safety Code. The consolidated District would describe the boundaries of each zone(a total of nine)to be that area now encompassed by each Sanitation District. Establishment of zones would allow for the continuation of differential sanitary sewer service charges and allow for the setting of rates in each zone to reflect local conditions and geography. The County Sanitation District of Orange Comm Page 57 Prepared By Ford Sauvajot Management Group,Inc. 6/17196 EXHIBITS Exhibit No.l County Sanitation Districts of Orange County General Information District District District District District District District District District No, 1 No.2 No,3 No.S No.6 No.7 No. 11 No. 13 No. 14 Year of Formation 1948 1948 1948 1948 1948 1948 1949 1985 1986 Number of Board Memben 5 12 16 3 3 7 3 5 5 Semler,Area(square man) 18.9 106 1011 18.4 15.3 34.6 15.8 36.8 92.2 Number of City Members 3 IU 13 1 1 5 1 4 3 Special Districts Within Territory 1 I 2 1 1 I "Ilu Count'8aninatimt i3islrict uforanpc Counly 1'n:l..d BY IroN 8aurapa Mmmg mmil Uroup,Inc. 6/I7/96 Districts Budgets for Fiscal Year 1995-% ExI jbit 2 EXPENORUREB q 1 JOPERATM IIDIST.3 IDIST.5 METE IDIST.] IDIST.17 IDMT 13 16CST, 14 TALS Djre sFes 12DDO 29000 38000 150DO 8DDO 78000 sow 12000 15500 155500 mramw SerNcs e of Joint Operating M11000 17619DDO 1658M 2007000 2599DDO 4655000 3485000 57MM la M 5438M `Tmnk Malntsens 35000 2500W 300D00 125000 30000 600000 12MM 10000 20000 1495a00 'Upstate,Odor Control 0 0 500000 D 0 0 0 0 0 500000 Whole UmWet Well Rep. 0 60DO 400DO 0 0 0 0 0 0 45000 'Pump Station Mantuan. 0 100000 375000 316000 30000 WOODO 175000 0 100000 169MM 'Puma&Ind.Wets Admen. 45M 130000D 575000 110000 950W 47WW 2000DO 10DD 50000 325NM 'Connection Fes Admin. 4000 130DOO 70000 50DO 3000 120DO 10000 24000 0 25M 'Inter-Dist.Speer Use Cho 3000 1000 0 0 20DO 10000 0 26000D 26M 'End Collection B COP Admi, 3000 700D 750D 2OW 2000 2000 25M 10DO 1000 28000 'User Fee Cdtecacn Ex. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5OW 0 500D TadFS Collection EV. 50DOD 22WW 2500M 50000 33000 70000 400DO 0 0 71SWO TresuWa Im sbsnt Adm. '&Banking Pass 6000 30000 45OW is= 120DO 21000 13000 2D00 500 1445DO uwmm 0 50000 190000 100000 15000 125ODD 135000 1000 60DW 676000 User Fs Expense 10000 25000 35000 10D00 10000 15000 10000 4000 0 1190DO Professional Sarvkee 10000 35000 75000 is= 10000 15000 5000 1000 12DDO 178M Printing And Publislion 1000 1001) 1500 1ODD 1000 2000 20DO 10DO 1000 11500 Tram&Mbg-Mmews MOesge 1000 2000 3000 1000 10DO 1000 Soo 1000 1000 11500 Uncdbctmle Acrwms 50DO tODDD 10DOO 10DD 10DO 1000 10DD 10DO 0 30000 BUUMAL 5888000 19821000 19080000 2T7200D 285ODDO 6814000 42230M 64ODDO 1974000 63972DDO NON-OPERATMO CWVrAdD of Part.Srvcrrmsfer 21000M 1400000 0 0 0 0 0 27000 158= 3585000 Interest 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 roes App.to Prior years 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .OTAL SON= 1400000 0 0 0 0 0 27000 158000 9583DDO RESERVES Portion d Insurance Reserve 1512000 18149000 33510000 87030DO 7228000 10/82000 6621ODD 931000 994000 85130000 Appropriation for Contigendes 12MM 3954000 3816000 554003 57ODDO 1323000 8450DO 128000 395000 1279M Aulhw®d General Rasrve 299MM 9911000 9540000 13W= 1425000 3307000 21120DO 320DOO 0 31000000 TOTAL 138D0000 53245000 65946000 134IMM 120730W 2172WW 13WIODO 2048000 3521000 198582(= PROJECTS Is EXPEND. Treatment Plant EManebn 0 99210DO 0 1204000 1588000 2790000 209M 0 2116DDO 19716000 Treebnent Plus Facilities 3279DDO 0 102130DO 0 D 0 0 3220DO 0 13814000 Radio Linked Telanefry Sys. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1381400D Pump Stetian Telusty Upgrade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D Omg Park Acres Samar IstaBnnt Purd ss,7.18 0 0 0 0 0 0 a a 0 0 Orange Park Acres Tmk,7-17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 D Atndn Porbt of Gisler-RedhA74-1 0 0 - 0 0 0 10000 0 0 0 10000 Gialr-Redh0)Siphon®Dalphi,7-162 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cp Hoarse;Saner SPAM.7-19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lemon Heights Saver System,7-16 0 0 0 D 0 0 a 0 0 D Lemon Houbb Pasted Rep.7-22 0 0 0 0 0 1450DOO 0 0 0 1450000 Ow Badge Pmp Stn.tmprv,b.633 0 0 0 D a 0 0 a 0 0 nt,Rcky Pre&Carona Del Mar _.sr-Gisler Inter.,W-1(AI(B) 0 0 0 0 5000D 12D000 0 0 350000 52000D Fa&,a,Rill,Bak,SYWIIeon SLS-12 0 0 0 0 15000 0 0 0 0 15ODD Watson AvaC at Seger,6-13 0 0 0 0 30000 0 0 0 0 30000 Districts Budgets for Fiscal Year I995-% Mbit 2 REVENUEBPo 1 ERATING(FunitW) IDIST.1 DIST.2 IDIST.3 JOIST.5 JOISTS JDJST.] FIST. 11 FosT. 13 IST.19 OTALS Csh&Imstmrda(App.Res&Canyon) BOSM 29121000 414770DO 10158000 824MDD 15031000 96130DO 1188000 8tI60D0 12177400D 'mWW Use,Fees 300000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300000 0 3000000 1200000 50000 60(00 650000 100000 0 D 5060000 User Fees 61470DD 198330DO 2111400D 260M 3340DDD 5310000 3120WO 818000 0 62151000 O&M Ammsmont(IRWD) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2800000 2600DOO Interest&Misc, Ruts 297000 1401000 2155OW 50WW 42SWO 73WW 468000 620D0 550DO 6197000 T.Allocation,Share of 1% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 De6rqu4m Teas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Redw.Agency Pass-Through 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 $ehyentlons 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tramfas From Other Fume 1000000 0 0 0 0 0 500000 0 0 15000DO TOTAL 13808000 53245000 659460DO 13115000 12073000 21728000 13MIODO M460DD 351000 196412000 CAM FU I Pro ISTA IST.2 IST 3 DIST.S IST.B DIST.7 Iar. 11 IST.13 DIST.14 OTALS Csh&Imetrnnb(App.Res&Gamy- ) 1036400D 55361000 51362DOO 1366DODD 57040DO 16740000 944WM 67150D0 1982DOD 171337000 Capital Facll.Asamemm(IRWD) 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 6500000 6500000 Trenefa flan Corot. Fund 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Combu Grams 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Transfer from COP Issum 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Connection Fees 710M 2350000 14100DO 4TOOD 470DO 235000 118000 470000 0 4748000 Industnal Waste Uaa Fem 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 An�Fees 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 User Fees 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sala of Capecry Rights 6300D 1910D0 Issom 23000 310DD 53000 40DOO 6000 41000 6440DO Jew Wass Equity Selo 0 20DO SB83000 0 14530DO 0 0 0 885000 82C3000 UoW Chime Ann mem Fee 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 from Dill fa Cont 6-374 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r .9nce of Aid of Cant.IRWD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Interest and Misc.Recegb 406000 255,000 2353000 622000 238DOO SMW 3=W 3200DD 213000 7601000 SUBTOTAL 1090M OD4555M 61204WO 143610D0 74730DD 1700M 9ZWW 75110D0 96010D0 199033000 7'Ndi Nen DEBT FINANCING ReAW lk!- Csh&Imstmms(App.Ras&Cmry- ) 444� W 1249BOW 112820DO 3084000 1655000 387BOW 2872000 0 0 397230 0 Reunb Series B Pymn%frin Dist 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 New COP beam 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10375000 2375000 12DW00 317500D 200500D 0 0 30180000 Tax h s,sent Ta Shoe N 1% 1850000 9200000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 peidw.A t Twe 0 0 0 0 0 425000 225000 150000 50000 0 0 0 0 Redm.Agency Pam-Thragm 380W 0 0 541000 $ublrentions 300DD 165000 1900p0 40000 25000 SSODO 0 p o 0 o Y1aoo 158000 388`aM Trmfo COP Sm frm Opel.Fund 210)000 140W00 0 200100D Interest&Mist.Reeeite p 222000 613000 562000 16`5N 83000 215000 141000 27000 ISM 76555OOD SUBTOTAL 8872WO 24D240DO 22459000 56740DO 2964000 732WM 5054000 TOTALFUNDING 19T7WOO 84479DD0 63663000 2003S0W 10437000 2482'70W 14974000 7538000 97590W 275588000 'Premnamlion fem tNellmi,5750.000 she bW9eted m nave bash received behreen No a 1991 end June 30, 1994. Remanirg anon feas based Won urbm ease.a urb sass,are due Prior W ints8bon of onnwr pmomdings w Oh the ecwrete somas rM to knwm. 1984-95 mn"issn fees x81 W$6398 per aae Mthod a lax exchange 99rmmmt. 2020 VISION CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS 4MUBWt 3 2020 VISION CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS ftes 1 199598 I19W97 1997-98 119W99 11999M ODD-05 TAL Alf clam PIM 1 Nex 8 KWudaMed Mofix:M. 1.8accimica9an of Pump Omes,P1-361 SWW 0 0 0 0 0 50D00 `eeendery Tmd Expansion to 80 MGD,P1-3 65D0000 140DOOM 135D0000 54DOODO 4000000 0 � 43400000 rhrwy Treatment 72 MGD Eaponsion,P1-3 100000O 500000D 10000000 120000OO 10000000 0 3800D000 4.Saeur0y S landscaping.Pl-38.1 10000 0 0 0 0 0 10000 S.MYc.Mods.Priady Elmmade PI-W2 10000 0 0 0 0 0 WOOD B.MYa Imprwanenb to Plant 1 P1-384 50000 0 0 a 0 0 SOOW 7.Fee Protection,SlgmaB Wtr Sys Mods P1-385 900000 4OW12D000D 4000D0 0 0 0 4ODD2500000 S.EYOO.Fac.Mods.8 Safery Upgracas P1d0-1 0 SOOOW 4000000 3000000 900000 0 8400000 9.Faci ty Made.and$duty Upgrades P1-40.1 500000 900000 200000 0 0 0 1600000 10.Pmnary Clarifier Raheb.P7<1 1000000 1000000 50000 0 0 0 2050000 11.SYsmic Ronald of NW-Struct Systems PI-43 0 3000000 11250DO a 0 0 4125000 12.3eiemic RelydO,Structural Sara P1d 1.3 100000 100000 2000000 1000000 0 D 32000D0 13.Chenlde8 WastMuubr Fac Mods,P1462,3 0 1300DD0 1300000 0 0 0 2800000 14.12KV DYtrilulicn Sys for Support Fac.,P7-47 400000 1600000 590DOO 0 0 0 2490000 1S.MYc.Amh.and TrbnM.PIL Imp,P140 4D0000 350000 0 0 0 0 7500DO 16.40 MOD 0Mw Activated Sludge 8 DAFe 0 0 0 0 0 463DOO 4630DO 17.BeS Presass(4 Units) 0 a 0 0 0 14300000 1430000D 18.8olds Slarege(4 Bins) 0 a 0 0 a 80000110 60000DD 19.O9estes:2®1100 Diameter 0 0 0 0 0 9100000 0100000 20.12kv Electrical Poaar Distribution 0 0 SOOW 1DOOOOO 1427000 0 2477000 21.Emerge cy Sewage Sypees System 0 0 0 0 0 1922DOO 192200D 22.Remwe Trickling Films 183 0 0 0 0 0 130000D 13000M 23.MYc.Spirals!Protects Pint.1,P139 50000 250000 275000 2W W W SW WO 130D000 4375000 24.1iYo.Jab Plan Protects 500000 500000 500000 500000 500000 250000D 5000000 25.01her Metter Planlcmfece 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a.Headeab No.1 Rebuild,2003 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 b.Ncadwams Nat Impe0erlPump Spead.201 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cRemwe Trickling Rhers 294.2007 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d.40 Mild Oxygen Acrd Sludge SDAF,2017 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 e.110 B Digesters,20D9 S 2012 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f.4 Bell Priestess.2004 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 KV Ppwer DYtrIDWon,2W7-2012 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Randby Pw.er Generation,2005 S 2015 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t.72 Mild Primary Treatment 2DD4 B 2012 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SUS-TOTAL 4tECLAMATKIN PLANT I 11470DOO 2960D000 33990000 249DOODD 17327WO 35885000 154172000 B.Pimd 2 New,aM RebodWW M®a Prd. 1.5uppat Facilities and Site Imprexararb aOpa sons Building.P2-23-5-1 35W W 0 0 0 0 0 350000 b.Warercusa Building,P2-35-7 140DW0 140DO00 7000W 0 0 0 35000DO c.MalMenance Wide g.P2-35.3 14000W 18000W 7000W 0 0 0 3700000 d.Phese 0 She 8 security Imp..P2-35-5 0 200000 10000W 1000000 95W0 0 5985 e.Cowtruction Office.M014(P2-354) 2500DD 1500OO a 0 0 a 4000DD 2.Rehabi01ete 7 Digesters,P2-39 25DDOO 40D= SWWW 3500W0 500000 27WM 135250DO 3.1crhnary TrealmeM 24 MGD Expansion.P2.4 0 0 0 2DI100 20000D 1410000D 14SODDW 4.SecaWary Traellcerd Etporolon,P2-42-2 1400000 500000 0 0 0 0 19WW0 S.Priady Misc.Mod..P2-43-1 50DOO 0 0 0 0 0 SODW B.MYc.Modifications,P2-43-3 1a0W 0 0 0 0 0 10000 7.Plard 2 Influent Diversion 20D000 14OWW 9000W 0 0 0 2500000 B.Fire Protection,Sian 8 Water Sys Mods P2- 1900000 21110000 100000 0 D 0 4100000 9.Eleed.Foe.Mods.BSeey Upgrades P2-47-1 0 SOODW 2500000 2W= 0 0 3250000 10.Foolity Mods.and Set*Upgretles P247-2 500000 2500000 825000 0 0 0 3625000 11.Pmnny Clarifier Rehab.P248 500000 4500000 1500000 0 0 a 650DOOD 12.Seismic Relro(d of NertSsruct Systems P2-50 0 35000DO 1100000 0 0 0 46D000D 13.Sewmic P"id Structural Sarin P2-53-2,3 50D90 1000000 3D00000 1000W0 0 0 5050000 141.Chernical and Plats Witter Made.,P2-55 1400WO 28W00 100000 0 0 0 17600DD 15.MYc.Seismic Mods end Flare Imp.P2-W 250DD0 22500D 0 0 0 0 475000 18.MYc.SpeWOl Prcjects Pan.2 SW W 2500DO 2000000 1750000 50D000 0 4550000 17.Sdlds Stooge 28ins 0 0 400000 24O W0 2400DOO O 52DOODO 18.A0Atlenol 105 Fool Digester 0 0 0 0 0 2000000 20DODOO 19.PYnl Weer Pump Station 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.ReeYaned Wabr System Hon.2 75000 3250M 1500000 1750000 0 0 36MM 1Yc.Jab Plan Projects SDWDO 500000 5000W SWWO 500W0 25000DO 500DOOD _.Juror Mrtn Plan"acts 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 aReplaro Primary Baehr A.8,C.2006 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 b.SMrMby Prover Generation,2005 8 2015 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c.M.Mrffg and Control System,2006 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2020 VISION CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS ExWit q 2020 VOION OOMMUCTION RD-0UI 2 Lilll�l .7 111i 19B6W 1997-B8 11OWN 109-W TAL SU6TOTAL-PLANT 2 10535DDO 2725DDOO 21625000 12350000 411Y1g0 10B750DO 84830000 'Vets PWOMIAlm Rw sl Emreion 10DOOD 200000 200000 2D0000 20000D 60000000 _ 50800000 D.IclemMm and Jod Fartm 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.Suppmt Faadi a Sib Impr mmnla 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 aDano65m of OW lab fm OlFss,J-11-1 200000 0 0 0 0 0 2000DD b.C4nNaI Lab Mod4ra5wm,J-17-3 180000 215000 30000 500000 0 0 905000 c.DmmDEm a Reuse of OM Cmbel Cemw 0 1150M 30000 l000D0 0 0 246000- dOemoSbon of Support BN9®P2.J-27 0 0 WOOD 0 0 0 80000 2Ou8a08 Boa6br Pumpswj" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 &Sing*Taw ReplocenwrtJ-34-1 1185000 340000O t000D00 1650D0 0 0 5750D00 b.ONbO RelrbMy 8 Pumpfm8 Mrs OOW 0 0 0 85000 100DDD0 30000000 310MA W C.Ek8Rep17W to Deep WOW W/12O'Oulla 0 0 0 /000000 1000000 750000DD 77ODDOOD 3.CnWulamd Fee.11.N &Dwg Sys J-25-1 500000 1OOOmD loom 1000000 10000DD 0 45WW0 4.Ehcd Pons Sys Rehab.SbdW J-25.2,364 20000D 500000 50DOOD 0 0 0 1200000 5.PIm4182 Mmimr/Camq Sys J-31-1,2,3,4,5 1900000 3850000 1S000W 12ODDOO 10000110 0 8250000 6.8111ndby Pomm 8 RdWb*Mods,JJ312 1050000 2000000 400000D Boom 1100000 0 141600OO 7.LkshadI Wpim Trwd ReplKarst 0 0 0 10000D0 SODW 0 250ODDDO 310000D0 B.Bbsokk Obpmel Prga 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 aCmtpoN Davmhabm Phed 0 0 27000D0 630000O 0 0 9000000 b1old AcpuiEim 0 3DOOOD 170DDDD 0 0 1000000 300DW0 c.LandM Dwsbpn Phse1 0 0 0 0 0 130D0000 130D0000 d.Canpest Fad0ry 0 0 0 0 0 SOOOOOO 500000D eAkeeWs D'ep.Lan M Phew 121111 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 /.Bbeahb Dbp.Equip Phase I B 02001 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 g.Ebcbbel PO DwTbuem,12Kv 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.Disbict Wmllabm Mwgie dNehwk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 aMod.8 Opw MgmM Complw Syst n 1000D0 15000D 0 0 0 0 250000 b.Lab Info.Mauganad Sysbm Upgrades 125000 25000D am 0 0 0 455OW c.Financ:W hfmwab Systwn 800000 150000 0 0 0 0 750000 dNehwk SyeWe tuysgrebm 3400M 380000 tODD00 0 0 0 820DOO CD4pboW Dom AmhwV 50000 75000 a 0 0 0 12500D .PmmSwkobVSymemMad 1000D0 25000 25000 250D0 25000 0 2DDDDO ,,.Imprman WCm Gwwabm 30000D 35000D 0 0 0 0 630W0 12.Cabb TrW lmpwsnmts 10DOW 500000 BDODDO 600000 600000 0 24000 O 13.Misc Jab Plan Pmjecm 5000D0 500000 500000 500000 BOOD00 5000WD 75DOODD 8U&TOTAL 4NTERPUWT&JO04T 7410000 13SODDOO 13045OX 18475000 11225000 15400D000 2185150M E.Spedd Prcme .Studs 8 Reaemtk Imaw Pb nv Mum 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 aPas/Admim Support I=@ PR I J28.J30 750DO 1500DD 0 0 0 0 2250OO b.Po*lfydm5c OndwgWOWafl Sbdes 400000 400000 500000 500000 1000ODO 0 2B00D00 c.CoU,Trbrnd S Dip Fa.Sbate&Study 2000W 1000000 2000D00 t0000DD 0 0 42DDDDO d.NPDES Pa 1 Support 100000 50000 0 0 100000 500D00 750DD0 2Ah OuNBy Cadrd Pmgm. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 aTadw and ROG Cmbck BioUkk&q FBIw 90DOO 5000D 1000D0 0 0 0 24000D b.AUEIllwuG m:Srce CnbI FsaMySlW 11119 W 25000 50000 0 0 0 0 75000 cAk Ou.my Ruml la�PWi 0 50DOD 5000D 0 0 0 100000 d.WW fa,Pump Slums 250DD 25000 0 0 0 0 50000 e.AO.Dmebme Daralcpmwot 250DO 250D0 0 0 0 0 50000 I.Central Gen Pam dw M".'w" g 75000 275M 0 0 0 0 35000D SUB-TOTAL - MLAL PROJEM 1015000 20750D0 2850000 1500000 110D000 500000 884000D F.Eaebmem Kama 3000000 250D000 26000DD 250D000 2600DOO 1250000D 25500000 G.Mwbr Pbe*Abe Fm Rehab 8 Ropme AOorWadb•s'Prdec4Abwa 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL JOINT WORKS CAPITAL REO 3353000D 751BMW 74810000 59925000 38547000 Z727600 O 552757000 1: bit 4 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - Graphs Capital Improvement Program - 1995-96 Solids pri�D, Secondary Treatment Digestion Treatment $7,Z50,000 $250,000 $2,500.000 1% 7% Safety Electrical Power Improvements provements $49 $1,950,000 ,15%% 6% Equipment S3,000,000 Miscellaneous 9% M.I.S. Projects Ocean Outfall $3,615,000 Studies& Sup port Facilities S3,280,000 11% Systems Research 53,635,000 10% $640,000 11% $1,585,000 2% 5% Total Capital Improvement Expenditures - $33,530,000 _ District No. 13 District No. 3 S322,000 $10,213,000 0.96% District No. 2 30,46% E9.921,000 29.59% District No. 1 $3279,000 District No. 5 - 9.780h District No. 11 District No. 6 $1.204,000 S2,099,000 District No. 14 District No. 7 $1,596,000 3.590.5 6,26% $2.116,000 S2.780,000 4.76% 6.31% 8'29% Total Capital Improvement Funding -$33,530,000 Budgeted Capital Improvements Yrolects All Districts - Fiscal Year 199&% Molt 5 EXPEND REa 2 PacuEOfa a MOIND. STA IST.2 .3 .5 .8 IDIST.7 IMST. 11 101ST. 73 DIST.14 TALS Pump So knpn'mb,&32,5-40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w.,14th SL a LMo Pop So kfipr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 AV P.S.RapbmM, 11-17-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 145mm 0 D 1450000 Sh er AV Force M=VGMVO Sewer, 11-17-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 100000 0 0 100000 Nid St Trrr k/SWar Faroe Main 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 AErron Nunbglan Bur Purm Turk 0 0 0 0 0 0 5OW 0 0 500D Gobeimast RepbesmM,11-17-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 10000 0 0 1mm IrrgrW Relief Inbrcepor 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ned IMrespkm 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mgnba RSA Sewr,Wmkulr to Tmk 0 0 50000 0 0 0 0 0 0 50000 Mi0r-NMr Turk Semr kWmb.3-38 0 0 l0om 0 0 0 0 0 0 1080000 Orwq&Wsum Sebum RAiA3-25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A ROW Trk.Malesm W IrM. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Beach ROW nk.W M toMeM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WM=W Foes Main RPL 3-3SR 0 0 3500I7110 0 0 0 0 0 0 3500DOO SARI Pfotmob.17th oweir Cr yn 0 30000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3t1000 SARI MAubAm Modh.2-145R2 0 250Dm 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 250000 &Coest Irk Ssm.Caoru Del Mar PS W CrysO Ov PS.535 IRWDReim. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cryag Ov PrrtP WO38 IRWD Rear, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pura MOM Rehab Hgeea,2-37 0 2mm 3mm 5mm 10000 300M 2tXD0 0 0 160000 PM So MmtlnonMs,7.14,-1,-2 0 0 0 0 0 BOOOOO 0 0 0 SOOOm Nvy Wy Pmp So Abudm..7-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cdbge Av PIS Par W FM.7-23.1 0 0 0 0 0 40000 0 0 0 40000 Main St Hurry StaBm,7-7-1 0 0 0 0 0 Bmm 0 0 250000 33DOOD -w Amours Mod.7-24 0 0 0 0 0 5000 0 0 0 5000 . , ..Deadly Trunk RMub,5.37-4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCN tNsvay Trunk Rol ,6-37-3 0 0 0 40D000 1800000 0 0 0 0 20DDD00 Fakgraads Samar Rehab 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Memory Lane Marospor.2-30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sunflower lrrtroepW 7$1.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tusor Air Boa FacaSec 0 0 0 0 0 5000 0 0 0 50M Rehab Cypress A"&bunk.2-94t1 0 27500D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 275m0 45 Fmr a y WK%nbg Prgeeta 2.35 0 100DD 300D 0 0 0 0 0 0 130DO 91 Freeway Wfdendg PrgaCe 2.7A 0 15m0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 150m Pawn Ave Pu,cl AWrdmAorbs Lints Pro Impmwm .233 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 AT/SF Rand Cmrrq Upgrdes 235 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cpaeily RIgM Rod"horn Dist 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3930DO 0 393000 Cpoay RQM Purctm from Dist 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 79000 0 79M MIS, Improanad Prgsob 750m 1mm0 loom 50DDD 30000 G= Smm 0 15m0 48000g Raknbures D6L5 for Cad 5.37-4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 JoH Works ERufty Purchase 72000 0 0 6570m 0 5372000 18150DD 291000 0 82030M Tfmser to Odw Fulls 100DDD0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 1mOmg Traisfr o Operdbg Fund 0 0 0 0 0 0 500000 0 0 SOmm Share A Capkid Reserve 4990000 14795m0 15230OW 17950m 23MW 4145000 313mm 480000 31550O SmmmD Slum A Envkonmmntd Reserve 48M 148m00 1523m0 1Boo 238DO0 014WO 313m0 A8000 310m 5DO100D ENOX09*100d4muraras Res. 1099000 33559000 2805m00 9920m 152100D 2493D00 428M 58MM 3399m0 8727000D Rehab.AgranmM Pay abM 0 0 0 loom 0 0 0 0 0 loom SURMAL 1090400D OMMM 812O100 14381WO 747300D 17m40m 992000D 7511000 9WI000 19OM300D usef IERVICB TMWW to CapkW F¢9des Fund 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TrrufroOpoub Fund 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Budgeted Capital Improvements Projects All Districts - Fiscal Year 1995-96 Mbit 5 EXPENDITURES Pa PROJECTS a EXPEND. IDISTA IDIST.2 DIST.3 DIST 5 101ST.6 DOT.7 DIST. 11 IDIST. 13 DIST.14 OTALS Deeueeaalee coat 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'Service 4289000 11392000 1D694000 20130DO 14680DO 2401000 2160000 27000 1580W 346020DO %rvice Reserves 4390000 116OWW 10486000 155WW 11710DO 1948W0 1827WO 0 D 32882000 Reserve fm Master Plan Projects 193000 1026000 1279000 2105000 3250M 2976000 10670D0 0 0 89710DO SUBTOTAL 8872DDD 24024000 2245MM 5674000 2DS4000 7323000 5054000 27000 158000 76555000 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 1977MM 84479DDO 83883000 20035000 10/37000 24927000 149740DO 753800D 9759000 275588000 Exidmt 6 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1995 and 1994 1990-1992 Series A Certificates of Participation E 94,300,000 1990-1992 Series B Certificates or Participation 32.670.000 _ 1990-1992 Sens C Certificates of Participation 95,600,000 1992 Refunding Certificates of Participation 150.105,000 1993 Refunding Certificates of Participation 45.700 000 Total certificates of participation 418.375,000 Less current portion 10,165.000 unarllortized discount 1.724 197 - Total bng4erm ;AQ6 485 803 1905 Certificates of Particoa= On August 13, 1986, Districts Numbers 1, 2 and 3 completed the sale of $117,000.000 of - certificates of participation. Interest payments were due February 1 and August 1, beginning February 1, 1987. Annual principal payments were due August 1, beginning August 1, 1988. In December 1992, the entire remaining principal balance of the certificates was refunded with a portion of the proceeds of the December 1992 Refunding Certificates of Participation (see below) in a transaction accounted for as an in-substance defeasairm 1990-1992 Canes A Certificates of participation On December 5, 1M, all Districts completed the sale of $100,000.000 of certificates of participation. Interest payments arc due monthly beginning January 1991. The interest rate on the certificates is adjusted by the remarketing agent daily based on market interest rates. The weighted average interest rate for the fiscal year ended June 30. 1995 was 3.8% Annual principal payments were due August 1, beginning August 1, 1991. Ali principal and interest payments am to be secured by nine separate irrevocable letters of credit issued by National Westminster Bank. The letters of credit will expire on December 15, 2000. unless earlier terminated. The Districts have Ike option of prepaying certificates in whole or in part at an amount equal to the principal plus accrued interest, if any,without premium. 1ee0-199 Series 8 Certificates of Part gnat on On May 1, 1991, Districts Numbers 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 completed the sale of $117,555,000 of certificates of participation. Interest payments are due February 1 and August 1 of each year. The weighted average interest rate for the fiscal year ended June 30. 1995 was 6.86%. Annual principal payments were due August 1, beginning August 1, 1992. The certificates were issued with an anginal issue discount of$3,731.496. The trust agreement for the certificates established a reserve fund equal to $7.369,539. which was funded from certificate proceeds and is being held by Texas Commerce Bank, the trustee (note 2), (Continued) 20 FxldEt 6 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1995 and 1994 In addition. Federal Guaranty Insurance Company provides munictpal bond insurance for the certificates. In December 1992, $38,350,000 of the outstanding principal balance of the certificates was refunded with a portion of the proceeds of the December 1992 Refunding Certificates of Participation(ace below) in a transaction accounted for as an in-substance defeasance. In September 1, 1993, $39,740,000 of the outstanding principal balance of the certificates was refunded from the proceeds of the September 1993 Refunding Certificates of Participation (see below)in a transaction accounted for as an tn-substance defeasance. In May 1991. the Districts and a brokerage company entered into an interest rate exchange swap agreement pursuant to which the Districts paid a floating interest rate equal to the J.J. Kenny (High Grade) Index plus 1.19% and received a fixed interest rate of 5.56% on a notional amount of $111,837,000. The swap agreement was temitnated in November 1992. The resulting gain of $5,174.102 was deferred and was amortized to interest expense over the original tens of the agreement and there Is no deferred swap gain remaining. 1990-1992 Seres C Certtfirates of Perlicinalion _ On September 1, 1992, Districts Numbers 1,2, 3. 6, 7 and 11 completed the sale of$98,500,000 of certificates of participation. Interest payments are due monthly, beginning October 7, 1992. The interest rate on the certificates is adjusted by the remarketing agent daily based on market interest rates. The weighted average interest rate for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1995 was 3.7%. Annual principal payments were due August 1, beginning August 1, 1993. The trust agreement for the certificates established a reserve fund equal to$9,850,000, which was funded from certificate proceeds and is being held by State Street Bank,the tr utee(note 2). December 1992 Refunding C_rtificales of Perticication On December 3, 1992, Districts Numbers 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 completed the sale of $160,600,000 of refunding certificates of participation. The Interest rate on the refunding certificates is adjusted by the remarketing agent daily based on market interest rates. Annual principal payments were due August 1, beginning August 1, 1993, On October 1, 1992, the Districts and a brokerage company entered into an I terest rate exchange swap agreement pursuant to which the Districts will pay a fixed interest rate of 5.55% and receive a vanable interest rate based on a tax exempt daily interest rate as determined by the remarketing agent on a notional amount of $160,600,000. This interest rate swap agreement is accounted for as a hedge, and the associated interest rate dieerential to be paid or received is accrued as interest rates change and is amortized to interest expense over the term of the swap agreement. The 20- year swap agreement matures on August 1,2013, The certificates were issued to refund the remaining outstandmg principal balance of the 1986 certificates of participation and $38,350,000 of the outstanding pnncpal balance of the 1990-92 Series B certificates of participation. The refunding qualifies as an in-substance defeasance with the proceeds being held in an inevocable trust by an outside trustee to provide for all future debt _ service payments on both debt issues. Accordingly, the trust account assets and the liability for the (Continued) 21 B ilh 6 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30. 1995 and 1994 defeased certificates of participation are not included in the Districts' combined financial statements. The aggregate principal amount of refunded debt outstanding at June 30. 1995 was $139.950.000. September 1993 Refunding Certificates of Particioafion On September 2, 1993, Districts Numbers 1,2,3, 5,6. 7 and 11 completed the sale of$46.000.000 of refunding certificates of participation. The interest rate on the refunding certificates is adjusted by the remarketing agent daily based on market interest rates. Annual principal payments are due August 1, beginning August 1, 1994. - On September 1, 1993, the Districts and a brokerage company entered into an interest rate exchange swap agreement pursuant to which the Districts will pay a fixed interest rate of 4.56% and receive a variable interest rate based on a lax exempt daily interest rate as detemmned by the remarketing agent on a notional amount of 546,000,000. This interest rate swap agreement is accounted for as a hedge, and the assoclated interest rate ddlerential to be paid or received is accrued as interest rates change and is amortized to interest expense over the term of the swap - agreement The 22-year swap agreement matures on August 1.2015, The certificates were issued to refund $39,740,000 of the outstanding principal balance of the 1990-92 Series 8 certificates of participation. The refunding qualifies as an in-substance defeasance with the proceeds being held in an irrevocable trust by an outside trustee to provide for all future debt service payments on both debt issues. Accordingly, the trust account assets and the liability for the defeased certificates of participation are not included in the Districts' combined financial statements. The Districts recognmed an accounting loss of$6.028,594 on the refunding which was classified as _ an extraordinary dem in the accompanying combined statement of revenues, expenses and changes in retained earnings. However. the Districts reduced their aggregate debt service payments by approximately $2,625,000 over the next 22 years and obtained an economic gam difference between the present values of the old and new debt service payments of approximately $3,647,000. The aggregate principal amount of refunded debt outstanding at June 30, 1995 was approximately$33.585,000. Annual Amortization Reguirements The annuat requirements to amortme all Districts' debt other than compensated absences and claim and judgments payable as of June 30. 1995, including interest payments of$315.410,026, are as follows. General Certificates Oblioaton Bonds of Par icirvttion Year ending June 30: 1996 5 15,600 $34.605.100 1997 15,450 34.500.054 1998 15.300 34,492,420 1999 15,150 34.597.510 2000 - 34,627,74a Thereafter 560.857.696 — $ -L� 733.783 526 (Continued) 22 Certificates of Participation District Allocation Percentages Series A Series B Series C 1992 Adv Ref. 1993 Series District No.1 9.260% 8.87% 10.15% 1Z88% 8.87% District No.2 26.25% 37.73% 27.92% 37.83% 37.73% District No.3 28.37% 21.49% 34.01% 35.87% 21.49% District No.5 8.48% 1341% 3.54% 13.41% District No.6 6.92% 366% 7.11% 0.97% 3.06% District No.7 9.81% 10.30% 7.61% 2.72% 10.30% District No.11 8.57% 4 54% 13.20% 1.20% 4.54% District No 2 13 .0 % District No.14 .00% 100,00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% R*Idt 8 EXHIBIT No. 8 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT OF ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF DIRECTORS COMPOSITION PURSUANT TO HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 4730 County (1) County of Orange Cities(20) Anaheim Brea Buena Park Cypress Fountain Valley Fullerton Huntington Beach Irvine La Habra La Palma Los Alamitos Newport Beach Orange Placentia Tustin Santa Ana Seal Beach Stanton Villa Park Yorba Linda Sanitary Districts(3) Costa Mesa Garden Grove Midway City Total number of Directors: 24 Exlli6it 9 EXHIBIT No. 9 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT OF ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF DIRECTORS COMPOSITION PURSUANT TO HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 4730.1 County(1) County of Orange Cities(23) Anaheim Brea Buena Park Costa Mesa Cypress Fountain Valley Fullerton Garden Grove Huntington Beach Irvine La Habra La Palma Los Alamitos Newport Beach Orange Placentia Tustin Santa Ana Seal Beach Stanton Villa Park Westminster Yorba Linda Sanitary Districts (3) Water Districts (3) Costa Mesa Irvine Ranch Garden Grove Los Alamitos Midway City Yorba Linda Total number of Directors: 30 LDS A ELES owU LA NABRA GO i FULL E N VORBA { : ti{ y UICENTIA LINDA - `'.^�! 'p P. 5. "y PAR LA K PALMA__- I _ ANAN IN ► g CYERES S VILLA o { �O1 I PARK 4 3 ;ALAMIMS . I ORANGE h GARDEN GROVE ESTMINSTER ss y A O 7 I �-� WUIITAIN VALLEY - NUNTG/G70N BEACX ' �v PACIFIC \� COSTA MESA E °> O�N ` K IRVINE N I Go COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA i 1989 Exhibit 11 All Districts Summary Operating Fund 1995-96 Budget Recommendations P." I APPROVED APPROVED ESTIMATED RECOMMENDED DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET - 1993.94 1994.95 199F95 1995 96 OPERATING. O4eaors' Fe.s 128,500 128.500 117,600 156,500 Cenv.Ciwl Servien SIIwe of JOInt Opw.11try 49,579,000 69.667.000 61,650.397 66,380,000 Umni iDo.,co 1,450.000 1.400.000 1.187,700 f,500,000 Uwtra.m Otlm Comrol 450.000 300.000 195.900 545,000 POP St Lem N`N Wet W.5 Rep.in 3,106,000 516,000 650.200 95.000 Pump Stwien Mtinten.npe 3.131,000 1,516.000 2,993.500 t.695.000 PwtMtnto lrM.Wnte Atlmin. 3.131.000 3.069.000 2,302.760 3.256.000 Coruwisit. Fw,UiiiIC 228.000 284.000 124,300 256.000 _ Inter-Dun.Sewer C P MItil 235.000 227.000 120.500 266.000 Gaul Ct,H n 6 COP tt. 58.000 27.000 80.200 23.000 Tn/Fee Colhcnon E.peme 858.00D 520.000 660.200 723.000 Treeetow a Inwetmem Min. 6 Bertuirq F.. 251.000 317.000 109.800 1441500 Utwi 646,000 665.000 574,600 676.000 U.Fee E.wnn 285.000 19ZOOO 60,600 119,000 Prolnetotul Swvic.s 264,000 1411.000 142.800 178,000 PFntin9 Antl PUEllwt.,, 23.500 te.500 Boo I I.500 Tr.w6 6 Mwtit19-Do aor's M9ee9e 12,000 12.000 6.800 11.600 UnwlbctNe Acwtmts 9000 9000 93.500 1 30000 TOTAL OPERATING 62,205,000 S9,022,000 56,398 447 63,972,000 NON OPERATING [with a of Participation SaaiwRnrxt 36.402.000 5.264.000 2,737,400 3.695,000 Inttom 0 0 0 0 E.wlues Aw4c.Eb to Rwt Yews 13 000 12,000 0 0 TOTAL NON-OPERATING 38,415,000 5,276,000 2,737,400 3,685,000 _ TOTAL OPERATING 6 NON OPERATING 100,620,DOO 64,298.000 59 135 847 67.657.D00 RESERVES Portion o1 Inwt,.A. 103.989.000 157,692,000 88.130,060 _ APaoW.I..for ConUn9enrhs 12,443.000 11,806,000 12.795.000 AutINrN.tl G.nw.l R.nrve 49.232.000 31 234 000 31 000 000 TOTAL RESERVES 165,664,000 200,732 000 131.925.000 - TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 266,284,000 265,030,00 198 562 000 Section 3- Page 2 Exhibit 11 All Districts Summary Operating Fund _ 1995-96 Budget Recommendations Pape 2 APPROVED APPROVED ESTIMATED RECOMMENDED DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET 1993-94 19 -95 1994-95 19 5-98 AVAILABLE FUNDING Can 6 Imeatmanta _ IAPnopriited Reaervae and Cant'-0vm1 152)41 ODO 179,589,0130 183,207,758 121,774,000 Industrial Uanr F. Br152,000 8,430.000 7,695,400 7.960.000 Unr Feas 60,757,000 61.239.000 60.418.600 62,151.000 Imaaet a Muc. ll. eIPa 10]6)000 1 15.772.000 6.21S.0001 6.197.000 SUB-TOTAL 79,676,000 8 441 000 74,328,900 76,308 000 Tax Allocation.SMrw o1 1% 28.651,000 0 0 0 De!quant Taxee 2.408,000 0 0 0 Badeveb0atent Agency Paoa Ttvnugh 2BO,000 0 0 0 Subventions 530000 0 0 0 SUB-TOTAL 31 B69000 0 O 0 Traroters From 0vIx r FtrMa t 9 8 G00 0 0 1 50G 000 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 266 284 000 265 030 000 25) 536 658 199 SB2 000 Bnpmnvlg m 1994-95 all popax,tax reveraree and COP amnro mate noxn linen Wdgeted in 11ho COP Fund to tlnarty ndat,ate that COP samice'¢from proper,tam and met O A M wets an Paul by user ten. Section 3-Page 3 Mbit 11 All Districts Summary Capital Facilities Fund 1996-96 Budget Recommendations AFfliOVED APPROVED ESTIMATED RECOMMENDED DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET 1993.94 199A-95 t 94-96 1995 96 PROJECTSAM1 FYFF� NOITIIRFS Trotmam Plam Eapwwon 70.032.000 67,805.000 24.001.000 33.530.000 Dormo,Pane Sution Prgems 8.785.000 5.018.000 1.911,000 1.316,000 Diemot Sewar/ImWeeptor Prgema 17,787,000 12.881.000 11,6A6,D00 11.625.000 Macellaflnus Improvemema Prolaola 875,000 851,000 0 480.000 Joint WpM EAvne Furman 5.941.000 6.947.000 8.9481000 8,203.000 Trarofar to Other Fume 0 0 2 1 ]ODO 1.600.000 A8 663 000 Ibimbwaemem A9reamarls 109,000 109.000 109,000 Share of Captil Reserve ID0,000,000 100.000.000 50,000.000 Share of Envmommenlal Reserve 10/000/000 10.000,000 5.0011000 EM[Ygwke/Flpednnswann R4a Tree 111,462,000 139.115.000 8).2]0.000 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 324,991,000 3A4 )26 199,033,000 AVAILABLE FUNDING cam 6 Invntmenta 1Appropie rol Aesm,,es aml Ca Vry ? 191 036 000 213.245.000 210.032.000 171 337.000 User Fees 14.000.000 18.000.000 E.868.OD0 6,500.000 Tranfar From Other Punta 63,202,000 ]6.050.000 10.103.000 0 Trarafar from COP Isawe 7.196.000 6.912,000 1,076,000 0 Comamion Fees 4.280,000 4,997.000 5,781.000 4.748.000 IrMwtri4 Waste U.Fears 1,983.000 0 0 0 Safe 41 Cepaol Rr" 1.384.000 392,000 7,]]1.000 6A4,000 Jomt Worke E4uily Safe 5,941.000 8.946.000 8,949,000 6.203.000 Inte eat am Mac. Reoaipla 15.971.000 16 1B1 000 5,499.000 )601 0 0 SUBTOTAL 133 95] 1131,481.M 1 46,029,000 )696 000 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 324 991 000 344 ]26 000 I OB1 D00 199 033 000 SecBOn 3-Page 4 Mbit 11 All Districts Summary Construction/ COP Fund 1995-96 Budget Recommendations APPROVED APPROVED ESTIMATED APPROVED DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET 1993-94 1994-95 1994-95 1995-95 PROJc -TS AND EXPENDITURES Transfer to Capital Feciifiee Fund 90,398,000 82,962,0W 4,456,528 0 Transfer to Operating Fund 1,998.000 0 0 0 Debt Issuance Cost 3,000,000 4,225,000 0 0 COP service 0 35.558,000 26,611,080 34,802,000 Debt Service Reserves 36.281.000 37,507.0W 33,372,000 32.982.000 Reserve for Master Plan Prgects 11,475,000 5,774,000 14,959,986 8.971,000 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 143.152,000 166026,000 79.399.594 76,555000 AVAIL ARLE FUNDING Cash and Investments (Appropriated Reaervea and Carry-aver) 76.491,000 42.552.000 45913487 39.723.000 New COP Issues 60.000.000 84.500.000 0 0 Reimburse Series B Advance 3.000,000 0 0 0 Tax Allocation.Share of 1% 0 30.180.000 27,842.074 30.180,000 Delinquent Taxes 0 0 429.381 0 Redevelopment Agency Paas-Throughs 0 425.000 489.165 425.000 Subventions 0 541.000 473,976 541,000 Transfer COP Service from Oper.Fund 0 5.264.000 2,738.078 3.685.000 Interest B Misc.Receipts 3.571000 2.564.000 1.513,433 2,001,000 SUB-TOTAL 66861,DW 123.474000 33.486.107 36,832.OW TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 143,152.0W 166026,OW 79.399.584 76.555.W0 Section 3-Pace 5 Exhibit 12 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Board of Directors As of June 30, 1995 ALTERNATE AGENCYICITIES ACTIVE DIRECTOR DISTRICT NOS). DIRECTOR Anaheim Bob Zemel 2,3& 13 Tom Daly- Brea Burnie Dunlap 2&3 Glenn Parker Glenn Parker 13 Burnie Dunlap Buena Park Don R. Ghft* 3 Patsy Marshall Cypress Cecilia Age' 3 Walter Bowman Fountain Valley John Collins 2&3 George Scott Fullerton Julie Sa' 2&3 Chris Norby Huntington Beach Victor Leipzig' 3& 11 Ralph Bauer Shirley Det0off 11 Ralph Bauer Irvine Barry Hammond 7& 14 Mike Ward' La Habra James H. Flora 2&3 Sieve Anderson _ La Palma Wally Linn' 3 Eva G. Miner Los Alamitos Charles E.Sylvia' 3 Robert Wahtstrom Newport Beach John C. Cox,Jr. 5 Jan Debay Jan Debay 5,6&7 John C. Cox, Jr. Orange Mark A. Murphy 1,2, 7, 13& 14 Joanne Coontz' Placentia Norman Z. Eckenrode 2 Carol Downey Santa Ana Pat McGuigan 1,2, 3&7 Ted R. Moreno Seal Beach George Brown' 3 Frank Laszlo Stanton Sal A. Sapien 3 Harry M. Dotson' Tustin Thomas R. Saltarelli 1,7& 14 Jim Pons' Villa Park Barry Denes 2 Bob Bell Yorba Lmda Daniel T.Welch' 2 John M. Gullixson John M. Gullixson 13 Daniel T.Welch' — SanitarylWater Districts Costa Mesa Sanitary Dist James M. Ferryman 1.6&7 Arthur Perry Garden Grove Sanitary Dist. Sheldon S. Singer 2 &3 George L.Zlaket Midway City Sanitary Dist Margie L. Rice 3 Grace Epperson Irvine Ranch Water District Peer A Swan 14 Darryl G. Miller County Areas County of Orange Roger R. Stanton— 1, 2, 3& 11 William G. Steiner" County of Orange William G.Steiner 5,6, 7. 13& 14 Roger R. Stanton" 'Mayor "County Supervisor 511Y96 Example of MIND Credits and Reserves Under All Consolidadon Options With Duck Ponds Wet Weather Flow Diversion,With Full Reserve Panicipadon No Later Than Vim Operating Funds 8 COP Service Capital Improvement Funds Liability 8 Catastrophe Reserves GSD 11 110ND TM From Endln9 Mbtlmum CSU 11 ERuB3 IRND Trei To Catastrophe EMhq Minhnum Galaswhe Eoin9 Minimum F'aly f N9009 co mood'. uNal Ba00s. HtlBOMr Cali6 Sale Worst Cfl Ixt0n 0ocrabn9 89iHmAlb sea, BBB H054p'M, Bamse H959CIDf 1995.1996 (2.132.000) 2.132.000 - 1 201,000 1.436.001) (2,731O00) 1,3 NQ 2,550,000 - (1,W.000) 2,772,000 2,824.000 1.364,000 1,3 ,000 ],)01,000 1996-1993 (2052.000) 1,53%OOD 518.000 1.2 .00D 1,529,000 (3,001,000) 9.721.000 }898.000 (518,000) (1.581.000) 9,I11.001) 2.175,000 1,567,000 5.931,000 5.931.000 1992-199B (2,IM.000) - 2.208.000 1,258.000 1,596,000 (2,952.000) 6A89,000 - (2,200,000) 1.418,000 10,159,000 1.856,000 I1,He,o6o1 1.515,000 4,515,00D 1996-1999 (2.2110.0001 - 3,058,000 2.038,000 1.T81.000 (1,11O0,000) (399,01sh - (3,050.00D) (82,000) 8,800,000 1,618,000 62,000 I,673,000 1,677.000 1999d000 (2.520000) - 2.713,000 2,M.M 1,921,000 MMOOD) 11.1m,aDD1 - (2,213,000) (180.00l 3.80%00D 1.IN,= 180,W0 4.250,000 0,757,001) 200 MI (2,020,000) 2,175,000 820.000 2,501.000 2.t42.M (1129.000) (343.000) 1,10!D00 (MOM (18.000) 3.D51.000 1.762.001) Ia.000 4.805.000 1,69S,00D 20012002 P.06e000) 3.272.000 - 2.121.000 2.335.000 (1,T52.00D) (2A81,000) 1,6&eMD - (3M.. 2,1961000 1,884.00D 331.000 5.139.000 6.139.00D 2002-2003 (3.3M,M) 3.675.000 - 2.980000 2.528.= (1,822,000) (2,201.090) 1492.000 - (285'M 2.317,000 1.B89,000 285.NO S, N.= 5,/2100D IOD VXM 13.612.000) 3,857,OOD - 3,205,000 2.7M (1,9Bg000) 12.3Da,o0o) 1.17e 0 - (285.000) 2,139.000 2,093,00o 285.000 5.709.000 5.209,00) 20 -Ms (3,912.000) 11T0.000 - 3,171.000 2,911s:: (2,0i6.000) (2,392,000) 4.707,000 - (281,090) 2,389,000 2.192,00) 281000 5,993,000 5.993000 2005-2006 (1.230,000) 1.511,000 - 3.719.000 3.181,000 (1.152.000) (2,177,000) I,D30.OD0 - (286.000) 2.501.000 2.302.000 286,00) 8.279,000 6,279,000 2000-2007 (4.5M1,000) 1.819.000 - 0,020,00D 3A02,000 (1,212,000) (2,185,000) 4.091,000 - 1292.000) 2.618.000 2.106.000 282,000 6,581,000 6,501,000 l� Q M (ad IRWDCONT XLS 5/13/eS Example of IRWD Credits and Reserves Under All Consolidation Options Without Duck Pond Wet Weather Flow Diversion,With Full Reserve Participation at 711798 Operating Funds&COP Service Capital Improvement Funds r Catastrophe CSD 14 IRVID Trd F. En0hg Minimum CSD 14 Equity IRM Tnl To Calaetmpha End, MiMmumEnding Re' DNAY .. t�8 cummOut cause Balm,- R,, � Sale lPu Al onanuuma Reams Mi Belam»• gM 861B9S1B90 (2,1J20W) 2,2>Z,WO - 1,318,000 1,482,000 (2,T31,OW) 4,uM.OW 2,550,oW - (3,286,000) 3,985.000 J,253,W _1986-1997 (2,520,000) 2,5%.NO - 1,364,0W 1,7W,000 (4,4s2,0W) 3,341,000 4,38R000 - (3.536,000) 3.716,000 3.030,00a.,1997-INS (2,664,WO) 1,998,000 1.7".000 2,382.000 1,865.W0 (4,116,OW) 3283.000 3,087.W0 p701OW) (881,0W) 3,385,000 2,82a005,762.000 e'2,1998.1M (2,760,000) 2760,000 - 2,392,000 2,082,000 (3,084,000) 80,000 2,735,000 - 14,000 3.136.000 2,824,007,715,000 7'711989-20W (2,9a8,000) 3249,000 - 2,653.OW 2,208000 (1,072,000) 238,000 1.737.00 - 35.000 3,2]S,OW 2,B11,W7,701,W0 7�70200MO01 (3,240,9W) 3A10,000 - 2,058,000 2,411,000 (2,784,0W) 1IND 2.771.000 - 1,000 3,274,000 2,810,0007,855,p00 7'ee; 2001.2002 (8,444,W0) 3.627NO - �042.000 2,570,OW (2,784,000) 484.000 Z,2W,OW - 08.000 3,246,WD 2,7BB,OW IW,OWI rset,OW 7.ee4 2W2-2003 (3,672,000) 3,872,000 - 3.M.000 2,738,OW (2,760,000) 624,000 2.070,000 - B1,W0 3.261,000 2,758,OW (81.000) 7,598,0U0 7.598 2003.2004 (3.812,01s, 4,126,0140 - 3,4eaOW 2,923,O00 (2,739,000) 5BS.0U0 2,021,000 - 71,00 3,182,000 2,730,000 (71.0001 7,517,0W 7.517. 2001-2005 (4.176,W0) 4.402,O110 - 3,682,000 3,100,0100 (2,712,000) SW,000 2,031,W0 80,000 3,WW 9,0 2.700.000 (W,6W) 7,4d8AW 7'348•r 200530W (4,428,000) 4,659,OW - 3,913,00 3.310,OW (1,428.0001 22.O00 1,2820W - 1,000 2,948,OW 2,7011,0W (1,000) 7,351 S6'a 3 0(200&2007 (4,720,0110 00) 4,982, 0 - 4.167.000 3.163.O00 (1p28,O00) 1419.O001 2,932,O00 - (48.O00) J.OBS,OW 2,725,OW 40,O00 7,385,OW ),431.1,p0 l_1 S a w IRWDCONT.XLS