HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-05-22 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
May 15, 1996
NOTICE OF MEETING
,honer JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
(714)9622411 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14
n'aog Box d8127 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Fountain Vall,CA
927288127
West add...: WEDNESDAY. MAY 22, 1996 — 7:30 P.M.
108"Ellis Manua
Fountain Valley,CA
927087018 DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Member The Regular Meeting of the Joint Boards of Directors of County Sanitation
Agenci8s Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange Count California, will
• 9 Yn
clot.s
be held at the above location, time and date.
Anaheim T—
arao
Buono Park
yprass
Fountain Valley
Fullerton B r e ary
HunGngw Beach
n Beach
ruins
Laebro
to p Palms Leh Alamitos Tentatively - Scheduled UDcomina Meetinas
Newporrtt Beach
Crnnga
Placentia
Santa Are STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday, May 22, 1996, at 5:30 pm
Seal Beach
Stamm
Tustin
vale Park AD HOC COMMITTEE RE - Wednesday,May 29, 1996 AT 5:30 pm
y.rbe Linda SPACE UTILIZATION
County of Orange
Sanitary Districts OPERATIONS,MAINTENANCE AND - Wednesday,June 5, 1996,at 5:30 pm TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE
Caste Mesa
Garden G}ays
Midway City PLANNING, DESIGN AND - Thursday,June 6, 1996, at 5:30 pm
Water nl.tricta CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE
Irvine Ranch
FINANCE,ADMINISTRATIVE AND - Wednesday,June 12, 1996,at 5:30 pm
HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE
A Public Wastewater and Environmental Man,gamenc Agency Committed to Protecting the Enwronment Since 1954
JOINT BOARD MEETING DATES
Month Joint Board Meeting
June Jun 26, 1996
July Jul 24, 1996
August Aug 28, 1996
September Sep 25, 1996
October Oct 23, 1996
November Nov 20, 1996
December Dec 18, 1996
January Jan 22, 1997
February Feb 26, 1997
March Mar 26, 1997
April Apr 23, 1997
May May 28, 1997
June June 25, 1997
AGENDA
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708
REGULAR MEETING
MAY 22, 1996 - 7:30 P.M.
.............
_......._............
...
............
...
...
._.........
...
...
.._.._..-------
------
......_..--"---._..__._.._.._._.__._.._.._._.._.._._.,
j In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this
agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the Districts'Administrative Offices not less
than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to
each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary.
j In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Boards
for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an
j emergency item or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the
attention of the Districts subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a
supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date.
i I
i._.._.__._..._.__.__..........._..._..._.._....._........................_.._.._..._.._..._........_..._.._.._..._.._......_...___.._..._._.__.._.._.I
(1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation
(2) Roll call
(3) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating
to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders)
(4) EACH DISTRICT
Annual election of Chair and Chair pro tern of the Boards:
(a) District 1 (f) District 7
(b) District 2 (g) District 11
(c) District 3 (h) District 13
(d) District 5 (1) District 14
(a) District 6
(5) Appointment of Chair pro tem, if necessary
(6) Public Comments, All persons wishing to address the Boards on specific agenda items
or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair,
speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks
may be limited to five minutes.
Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda
cannot have action taken by the Boards of Directors except as authorized by
Section 54954.2(b).
05/22/96
(7) The Joint Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports
on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are
for information only and require no action by the Directors.
(a) Report of Joint Chair; consideration of Resolutions or commendations,
presentations and awards
(b) Report of General Manager
(c) Report of General Counsel
(8) EACH DISTRICT
If no corrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will be deemed
approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair.
District 1 - April 24, 1996 regular
District 2 - April 24, 1996 regular
District 3 - April 24, 1996 regular
District 5 - April 24, 1996 regular
District 6 - April 24, 1996 regular
District 7 - April 24, 1996 regular
District 11 - April 24, 1996 regular
District 13 - April 24, 1996 regular
District 14 - April 24, 1996 regular
ALL DISTRICTS
(9) Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and
individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that
vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director
expresses a desire to vole differently for any District.)
ALL DISTRICTS 04/17/96 05/01/96 MISC.
Joint Operating Fund - $ 573,666.89 $305,327.31 $251,397.49
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 1,450,407.02 328,632.67 4.333.46
Joint Working Capital Fund - 161,155.48 279,915.93 0.00
Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 5,043.93 71,860.61 93.221.91
DISTRICT NO. 1 - 894.00 2,526.70 0.00
DISTRICT NO. 2 - 2.007.16 25,755.01 423.00
DISTRICT NO. 3 - 9,541.80 963,295.90 90.00
DISTRICT NO. 5 - 177.00 5,550.48 538.13
DISTRICT NO. 6 - 24,115.00 1,189.01 0.00
DISTRICT NO. 7 - 882.80 9,780.91 0.00
DISTRICT NO. 11 - 5,097.40 8,534.00 0.00
DISTRICT NO. 13 - 0.00 35.61 0.00
DISTRICT NO. 14 - 0.00 506.93 0.00
DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 243,282.06 147,226.53 0.00
DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 0.00 213.52 0.00
DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 0.00 16.71 0.00
$2.476.270.54 $2.150.367.83 $350,003.99
-2-
05/22/96
r CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 10
_..._.._..._.._.............................................................................._......_.................._......._........
..._.._.._.._.._..._.._..._.._.._.._
I
All matters placed on the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or i
further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the i
consent calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there i
l will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be
enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions i
i included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be i
considered in the regular order of business. i
i
Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon
i recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by number the item to be
j removed from the consent calendar. !
i
I The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. I
i
Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar
not specifically removed from same, as follows:
DISTRICT 7
(10) Consideration of Resolution No. 96-53-7, approving agreement with County of
Orange providing for the adjustment of manholes on District sewers in conjunction
with the County's 1995-96 street resurfacing program in unincorporated County
areas within District No. 7, and providing for payment of the actual cost of the
manhole adjustment plus 10% for inspection and administrative costs for
approximately 70 manholes, at a per-manhole unit cost not to exceed $220.00 nor
be less than $155.00 per manhole; and authorizing payment of required deposit of
$13,650.00 for said work.
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
ALL DISTRICTS
(11) Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any
-3-
05/22/96
NON-CONSENT CALENDAR
ALL DISTRICTS
(12) (a) Receive and file draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on
April24, 1996.
(b) Verbal Report by Chair of Steering Committee re April 24, 1996 meeting.
(13) (a) Receive and file draft Operations, Maintenance, and Technical Services
Committee Minutes for the meeting held on May 1, 1996.
(b) Verbal Report by Chair of Operations, Maintenance, and Technical Services
Committee re May 1, 1996 meeting.
(c) Consideration of the following actions relative to Amendment No. 1 to
agreement with SAIC for Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for Districts'
120-inch Ocean Outfall, Specification No. P-156R, providing for an
extension of the contract from July 1, 1996 through June 30, 1997
(OMTS95-033b):
(1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Operations,
Maintenance and Technical Services Committee certification of the
negotiated fee for said additional services.
(2) Consideration of Resolution No. 96-51, approving Amendment No. 1
to said agreement with SAIC for Ocean Monitoring Contract Services
for Districts' 120-inch Ocean Outfall, Specification No. P-156R,
extending the contract from July 1, 1996 through June 30, 1997, for
an amount not to exceed $1,474,098 for said time period.
(d) Consideration of motion approving Billing Agreement with Southern
California Gas Company as Districts' agent to facilitate billing for amounts
due to Districts for compressed natural gas dispensed from Districts'
refueling station, at a cost of$.20 per transaction, cancellable on ten days
written notice (OMTS95-041 d).
(14) (a) Receive and file draft Planning, Design, and Construction Committee
Minutes for the meeting held on May 2, 1996.
(b) Verbal Report by Chair of Planning, Design and Construction Committee re
May 2, 1996 Meeting.
(c) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to issue a
purchase order to ADS Environmental Services, Inc. in an amount not to
exceed $131,300.00 for Dry Weather and Wet Weather Flow Monitoring
Services (PDC96-18).
4-
05/22/96
r ALL DISTRICTS
(15) (a) Receive and file draft Finance, Administration, and Human Resources
Committee Minutes for the meeting held on May 8, 1996.
(b) Verbal Report by Chair of Finance, Administrative and Human Resources
Committee re May 8, 1996 Meeting.
(c) Consideration of motion approving the following revisions to MPRP
(Management Performance Review Plan) Performance Incentive Values
[The following are management proposals to be considered as part of the meet-and-confer
process] (FAHR96-26):
(1) Establish a Target Merit Pool Fund of 2.0% of payroll for
implementation in July 1997, as a non-base building bonus for
performance that exceeds expectations or is outstanding.
(2) Provide for market adjustment not to exceed 2.0% of payroll or CPI
for Los Angeles-Anaheim-Riverside, whichever is lower.
(d) Consideration of motion to receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month
of March 1996 (FAHR96-27).
(a) Consideration of Resolution No. 96-52, amending Resolution No. 95-105,
implementing MetraHealth Point-of-Service medical plan effective July 1,
1996, to fund dependent medical premiums at 80% and employee only
coverage at 100%; and, to convert self-funded dental insurance to fully-
insured program through Delta Dental (FAHR96-28).
(f) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to place Comprehensive General
Liability and Excess Liability Insurance for the period July 1, 1996 to July 1,
1997, with the California Municipal Excess Liability (CAMEL) Program in an
amount not to exceed $125,000.00 (FAHR96-31).
(g) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue Change Order No. 2 to
Purchase Order No. 74798 issued to Clements Environmental in connection
with the County Landfill Acquisition, providing for additional technical review
of the County's closed landfill sites and solid waste industry analysis, in the
amount of$69,945.28, increasing the total authorized amount from an
amount not to exceed $100,000.00 to an amount not to exceed $169,945.28
(FAHR96-33).
(h) Consideration of motion to receive and file Third Quarter Financial and
Operations Report dated March 31, 1996 (FAHR96-34).
-5-
05/22/96
ALL DISTRICTS
(16) Consideration of the following actions re Bayside Drive Pump Station Sewage Spill
on February 22, 1996:
(a) Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Report dated May 15, 1996.
(b) Consideration of motion to receive and file Administrative Civil Liability
Complaint No. 96-3 issued by California Regional Water Quality Control
Board, Santa Ana Region, relative to the Bayside Drive Pump Station
Sewage Spill on February 22, 1996.
(17) Consideration of the following items re introduction of proposed ordinances
increasing sewer connection charges (FAHR96-25):
(a) Report of General Counsel re proposed Ordinances
(b) Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Report dated April 10, 1996
re proposed Ordinances.
(c) DISTRICT 1
Consideration of actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 130, An
Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of
Orange County, California, Amending Section 702 of Ordinance No. 119
Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations Relating to Increased
Capital Facilities Connection Charges:
(1) Consideration of motion making finding that adoption of said
Ordinance is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and Public
Resources Code 21080(b)(8) in that the Ordinance is a regulatory
action taken by the District to assure the protection of the
environment; and the increased revenues to be received by the
connection charges will be used to reimburse the District for capital
projects which have been, and will be, constructed and which are
necessary to maintain service within the existing defined service
areas of the District, as set forth in the comprehensive Master Plan.
(2) Consideration of motion to read said Ordinance No. 130 by title only,
and waive reading of entire ordinance (must be approved by
unanimous vote of Directors present).
(3) Consideration of motion to introduce said Ordinance No. 130 and
pass to second reading and hearing on June 26, 1996.
-6-
[ITEM (17) CONTINUED ON PAGE 7]
05/22/96
r (17) (d) DISTRICT 2
Consideration of actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 222, An Ordinance
of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County,
California, Amending Section 702 of Ordinance No. 214 Establishing
Wastewater Discharge Regulations Relating to Increased Capital Facilities
Connection Charges:
(1) Consideration of motion making finding that adoption of said Ordinance
is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and Public Resources Code
21080(b)(8) in that the Ordinance is a regulatory action taken by the
District to assure the protection of the environment; and the increased
revenues to be received by the connection charges will be used to
reimburse the District for capital projects which have been, and will be,
constructed and which are necessary to maintain service within the
existing defined service areas of the District, as set forth in the
comprehensive Master Plan.
(2) Consideration of motion to read said Ordinance No. 222 by title only, and
waive reading of entire ordinance (must be approved by unanimous vote
of Directors present).
(3) Consideration of motion to introduce said Ordinance No. 222 and pass
to second reading and hearing on June 26, 1996.
(e) DISTRICT 3
Consideration of actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 325, An Ordinance
of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County,
California, Amending Section 702 of Ordinance No. 317 Establishing
Wastewater Discharge Regulations Relating to Increased Capital Facilities
Connection Charges:
(1) Consideration of motion making finding that adoption of said Ordinance
is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and Public Resources Code
21080(b)(8) in that the Ordinance is a regulatory action taken by the
District to assure the protection of the environment; and the increased
revenues to be received by the connection charges will be used to
reimburse the District for capital projects which have been, and will be,
constructed and which are necessary to maintain service within the
existing defined service areas of the District, as set forth in the
comprehensive Master Plan.
(2) Consideration of motion to read said Ordinance No. 325 by title only, and
waive reading of entire ordinance (must be approved by unanimous vote
of Directors present).
(3) Consideration of motion to introduce said Ordinance No. 325 and pass
to second reading and hearing on June 26, 1996.
-7-
[ITEM (17) CONTINUED ON PAGE 8]
05122/96
(17) (f) DISTRICT 5
Consideration of actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 534, An Ordinance
of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County,
California, Amending Section 702 of Ordinance No. 526 Establishing
Wastewater Discharge Regulations Relating to Increased Capital Facilities
Connection Charges:
(1) Consideration of motion making finding that adoption of said Ordinance
is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and Public Resources Code
21080(b)(8) in that the Ordinance is a regulatory action taken by the
District to assure the protection of the environment; and the increased
revenues to be received by the connection charges will be used to
reimburse the District for capital projects which have been, and will be,
constructed and which are necessary to maintain service within the
existing defined service areas of the District, as set forth in the
comprehensive Master Plan.
(2) Consideration of motion to read said Ordinance No. 534 by title only, and
waive reading of entire ordinance (must be approved by unanimous vote
of Directors present).
(3) Consideration of motion to introduce said Ordinance No. 534 and pass
to second reading and hearing on June 26, 1996.
(g) DISTRICT 6
Consideration of actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 628, An Ordinance
of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County,
California, Amending Section 702 of Ordinance No. 620 Establishing
Wastewater Discharge Regulations Relating to Increased Capital Facilities
Connection Charges:
(1) Consideration of motion making finding that adoption of said Ordinance
is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and Public Resources Code
21080(b)(8) in that the Ordinance is a regulatory action taken by the
District to assure the protection of the environment; and the increased
revenues to be received by the connection charges will be used to
reimburse the District for capital projects which have been, and will be,
constructed and which are necessary to maintain service within the
existing defined service areas of the District, as set forth in the
comprehensive Master Plan.
(2) Consideration of motion to read said Ordinance No. 628 by title only, and
waive reading of entire ordinance (must be approved by unanimous vote
of Directors present).
(3) Consideration of motion to introduce said Ordinance No. 628 and pass
to second reading and hearing on June 26, 1996.
-8-
[ITEM (17) CONTINUED ON PAGE 9]
05/22/96
ALL DISTRICTS
1
CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on I
this agenda as a regular meeting of the Boards,the Chair may convene the
Boards in closed session to consider matters of pending real estate i
negotiations,pending or potential litigation,or personnel matters,pursuant to i
Government Code Sections 54956.8,54956.9, 54957 or 54957.6.as noted. i
Reports relating to(a) purchase and sale of real property;(b)matters of I
pending or potential litigation; (c)employment actions or negotiations with i
employee representatives;or which are exempt from public disclosure under
the California Public Records Act,may be reviewed by the Boards during a I
permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such i
time as final actions are taken by the Boards on any of these subjects,the
minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information.
I
(a) Convene in closed session, if necessary
(b) (1) Confer with General Counsel re status of litigation, Patterson v.
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Orange County
Superior Court Case Nos. 738179, 738622 and 741371 (Government
Code Section 54956.9[a]).
(2) Confer with General Counsel re status of litigation, Louis
Sangermano v. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,
Orange County Superior Court Case No. 732680 (Government Code
Section 54956.9[a]).
(c) Reconvene in regular session
(d) Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session
(19) Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(20) Matters which a Director would like staff to report on at a subsequent meeting
(21) Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff
report
(22) DISTRICT 1
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(23) DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion to adjourn
_11_
asr22/96
(24) DISTRICT 2
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(25) DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(26) DISTRICT 3
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(27) DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(28) DISTRICT 5
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(29) DISTRICT 5
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(30) DISTRICT 6
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(31) DISTRICT
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(32) DISTRICT 7
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(33) DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(34) DISTRICT 11
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(35) DISTRICT 11
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(36) DISTRICT 13
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(37) DISTRICT 13
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(38) DISTRICT 14
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(39) DISTRICT 14
Consideration of motion to adjourn
_12_
O5122/96
.............................._........................................_..— —.._..._.._.._._..—..-........................................_.................._.............
:
NOTICE TO DIRECTORS: To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Joint
Boards, Directors shall submit items to the Board Secretary not later than the close of business
14 days preceding the Joint Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on the agenda
all items submitted by Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and all formal i
i communications.
Board Secretary: Penny Kyle (714) 962-2411, ext. 2026
Secretary: Patricia L. Jonk (714) 962-2411, ext. 2029
i Secretary: Janet L. Gray (714) 962-2411, ext. 2027
-13-
J:%wvoocesAGWWrsswas.wpo
" -� COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
May 15, 1996
phone:
(714)962-2411 To the Chair and Members
mailing address: of the Joint Boards of Directors
P0. Bm 8127
Fountain valley.cA 9272"127 Subject: Board Letter
street add.:
10844 His Averse
Fountain Valle,CA The following are items that you may find interesting. If you need additional
92708 701 B information on any of the items, please call me.
Change to Agenda Package
Member At the April Steering Committee meeting, staff was authorized to change the agenda
Agencies package for a trial 90-day period. Beginning with this agenda, only the summary
• reports for action items that were unanimously approved by the working committees
Cities will be included with the Joint Boards agenda backup information. If you desire
Anaheim additional information on any item, please contact the person indicated in the
Brea summary report. Staff is continuing to evaluate this process and additional
Buena Park recommendations will be forthcoming.
Lypress
Foumeln Valley
Fullerton Santa Monica Bay Restoration Project
Huntington Beach
tyros
Le Habra Attached is an article from the L.A. Times on the water quality of the Santa Monica
Le Palma Bay. The Districts participated in the Santa Monica Bay Restoration Project by
Los Alamitos collecting and analyzing samples for human enteric viruses. The Long Beach State
Newport Beech
orange Foundation provided funding for eight students who drove to three sites every
Placentia weekend between June and September, took samples and then returned the
San.A.Seat Be samples to the Districts. Districts' employees performed the analyses.
S[encon
r 5°n Harassment Policy
Villa Park
lbrba Linda
The attached memo dated May 8, 1996, reaffirms the Districts' Harassment Policy. It
County of orange was sent to all employees as a reminder that harassment of any kind will not be
tolerated at the Districts, and advising them of their rights. The more we stress
senits^' Diatriots these policies, the more aware our employees will be regarding this issue.
Costa Mesa
Gerson Grave California Regional Water Quality Control Board Administrative Civil Liability -
MldwayCity Complaint No. 96-53
water Districts
Irvine Bench As you may know, the Districts has received a Complaint from the Santa Ana
Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) assessing Administrative Civil
Liability for the sewage spill on February 22, 1996, which resulted from the failure at
the Bay Bridge Pump Station. The Complaint charges the Districts with violating the
California Water Code and provisions of our NPDES (National Pollution Discharge
Elimination System) ocean discharge permit by spilling sewage into homes and into
Newport Bay. A maximum fine of$410,000 was possible under the provisions of the
Water Code, but the RWQCB assessed a fine of$50,000. In determining the
A Public Wastewater and Environmental Management Agency Committed to Prohoc ing the Environment Since 1954
Chair and Members of
the Joint Boards of Directors
Page 2
May 15, 1996
amount of the fine, the RWQCB took into consideration the Districts' long history of
outstanding compliance, the Districts' response to the residents who were affected,
and other factors allowed by the Water Code. Staff discussions between the two
agencies indicated that the RWQCB's most significant concern was that the Districts'
staff did not take immediate action after receiving the alarm from the pump station;
something they felt could be indicative of inadequate training. The Districts has
addressed this issue in its follow-up with the RWQCB.
A hearing on the Complaint is scheduled for the RWQCB's regular meeting on May
21, 1996. The Complaint allows the Districts to waive the hearing by paying the fine
before May 17. Staff believe that the Complaint and the amount of the fine are
reasonable, indeed very low, given the seriousness of the spill. Nevertheless, staff
is uncomfortable recommending payment of the fine in order to avoid the hearing. If
there are members of the public who wish to address the RWQCB on the matter,
preventing the hearing will leave those people without an opportunity to participate in
the process. While the public can submit written comments without a hearing, those
comments would not be considered by the RWQCB in a public forum. Joint Board
Chair Cox and the General Manager decided that the Districts should not waive the
opportunity for a public hearing. Staff will be present at the hearing to discuss the
seriousness of the incident and indicate that the Districts do not oppose either the
substance of the Complaint or the amount of the fine. Staff will also respond to
questions from the RWQCB and the public if appropriate.
CSDOC'S General Information Sheet
Attached is a FY '95-96 general information sheet which provides pertinent facts and
key statistics on operations/treatment and financial information on the Districts.
Results of the Internal Communications Audit
An Internal Communications Audit was conducted earlier this year to gauge
employees' perceptions, concerns, morale and attitude. Some 260 employees
responded to the audit, the largest number of respondents to any employee survey.
We believe this response rate emphasizes the importance employees place on
communications.
Audit highlights include the following:
- nearly 80% agree to some extent with the statement, "We've gone through
some tough years at the Districts, but I think things are improving."
- when asked if they believe "Morale at the Districts is improving,' about 50%
agree to some extent while approximately the same number disagree.
a
Chair and Members of
the Joint Boards of Directors
Page 3
May 15, 1996
- nearly 80% feel communications at the Districts is improving.
- 66% agree to some extent that"the Districts cares about me and what I
think."
- 95% say the Districts is a good place to work.
- employees say the Districts' mission, goals and objectives have been clearly
communicated to them.
- supervisors, managers and department/division meetings are employee's
first choices for accurate, reliable information.
The Internal Communications Audit will be conducted again in January 1997 and the
results compared as a benchmark to the effectiveness of our employee
communications' program. A copy of the survey results is attached.
Ad Hoc Committee To Review Saybrook Capital Inc. and Price Waterhouse
Billinas
Meeting tentatively scheduled at the Districts for June 11, 1996 at 5:30 p.m. To be
confirmed.
If you would like additional information on any of the above items, please call me.
Dona dl F. Mclntyre
General Manager
DFM:cmc
J%W DOO1GM FMIB OLTAIB 522%
Attachments: L.A. Times Article re: Study of Santa Monica Bay
Harassment Policy Memo dated May 8, 1996
RWQCB Letter re: Administrative Civil Liability dated May 1, 1996
Districts' FY '95-96 Pertinent Facts and Key Statistics Sheet
Results of Internal Communications Audit
ORANGE COUNT Y 5AN11 A I IUN UI51 Nil: I ci
NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS
Name of Paper Section Page Dale Saber
fa Times Frohf A3 5-7- 5
& Sc,ngr- r�cn ; cct /3ay
Study of Santa. Monica. Bay..
mks Drams and Illness
4JAMf5 ecdotal evidence that Los An-
es srsrr warrsa r. geles most.popular recrea-
't >��• Uonel -resoinrx'+makes some
RAn unprecedented health 1 people sick me - '
Krvey. shows':.that t Santa: . But the Santa Monica Bay
onica Bay.beach-goers who Bastoration Project and other
n`,�m near storm'drams are sponsors said the exhaustive .
almost 50%. more likely toy' survey of swimmers gives rea
+:lwntract 'colds, sorejthmatsj son for some optimism,'since` -
tdferrhea'-and other illnesses; the risk_of
illness decreases' '
"than those who.swim:farther,_-_dramatically:for -those -who -
away in cleaner water. swim 100 yards or more from
-Scheduled to he released to- the dozen drains that typically i
nay,the research by USC epi' < empty into the bay ye,ar-round !
demiologist Robert-W.-11afe, Swimmers outside the drain-. I
cord ms for the firsttime'an- ` 'Please see BAY,AN
BAY: Study Says Runoff Makes Swimmers III
Continued from A3 Steve Saylurs,a captain with the agency.
age areas were tar less likely to fall ill, nI'a1118ge Researchers believe that their results he,
?erhaps tittle more than if they had swum in a identified a pollution measure that will 1
?col or stayed out of the water altogether. Problems more useful,in the future,in predicting wht
"The good news is that, of the bay's the ocean is unhealthful.
50-plus-mile coastline, less than two miles Santa Monica Bay beach-goers who In the past, public health officials liar
are problematic;'the report said. swim near storm drains face a relied heavily on measuring the cancer
The Sane Monica Bay Restoration Proj- Vatlon of colitorms, ubiquitous bacteria pit
act—a consortium of cities, businesses, envi- significantly higher risk of becoming sent in lawn clippings,
-onmental Bo g III than those who swim farther away ppioth pet droppings,home
groups and government agencies— in cleaner water.Here are the � waste and many other plants and animal
:ommissioned the survey as one of the prior- approximate locations of storm drains Because many of those sources are m
'.ties in its five-year plan to clean up the bay. that typically now year-round into associated with human diseases, howeve
The epidemiology study,the first of its kind the ooeam high coliform readings do not always men
'n the nation, surveyed 15,492 people who 1.Malibu Creek and Lagoon,Malibu high risk to swimmers.
went into the water last summer at three 2,Topanga Creek,at Topanga Canyon Haile a study found,however,that illness
ocations—Surfrider Beach in Malibu, Will far more likely when a high percentage of th
3ogers State Beach in Pacific Palisades and Boulevard bacteria comes from human waste. Virtue
Monica State Beach,one mile south of 8.Santa Monica Canyon, 50% or more of the coliforms were fec:
he Santa Monica Pier. Interviewers reached Chautauqua Boulevard andd West coliforms,the number of swimmers contract
Host of the participants a week or two later to Channel Road g 4.Montana Avenue,Santa Monica in respiratory illnesses more than doubled.
letermine how many had become ill. The survey does have its limitations.
In response to the survey's findings, late S.Santa Monica Pier
S.Windward
Avenue,Santa Monica
Angeles County signs to are printing more 7,Windward Avenue,Venice Because it was intended to link publt
'.daim, and
signs m he placed near storm S.Ballona Creek,Marina del Rey health to water quality on particular day:
Tams, and county lifeguards are pledging m 9,28th Street,Hermosa Beach swimmers who went in the ocean more the
.sue stronger admonitions against swimming 10.18th Street,Hermosa Beach once in 10 days were not questioned. It th
n polluted waters.The findings also could push 11.Herondo Street,Redondo Beach frequent swimmers had become W, inter
head stalled talks among 85 cities on how but 12.Avenue I,Redondo Beach viewers would not have been able to link th
o dean urban runoff that Rows uto drains and yrota:a rem year ouM stem Grain at the dasea sickness to a particular locale and polludo:
hue into lire bay. me aamaamd in show mamas aueady tadirened condition,researchers said:
to a sewage pant,omerthan turingdheany into That meant that the survey necess il;
Cl aile suggested that the study may have the«can. excluded surfers and lifeguards. "The pre
Cl national implications. souse:sane mono say Restoration Piatea sumption would be that those people are at
"There are a lot of beaches subject to urban higher risk from additional exposures,"Hall,
unti Haile said. "Are those beaches hav- - said. "There is a chance, on the other hand
ng some trimmed risk? The answer is as a control group,it found that the levels of that they would build up immunities. But
robably yes,because the beaches we studied Wheat dropped off dramatically even 100 doubt that, because you would have to bush
an not unique." up resistance to so many different pathogen.
Swimmers and surfers long have reported yards from the mouths of the drains. in the water."
*etting sick after plunging into the surf from Too few swimmers were questioned in the Researchers did not examine possible
be
falibu to Torrance. Researchers had con- study compare the relative risks at the health effects on people who wade in of
=ad that pollution,including human waste, three beaches. Malibu Surfrider, which re- otherwise did not put their faces into tht
owed out of some storm drains.But without chives runoff from Malibu Creek, generally water,nor did they study any of the dozens it
health survey, the source of the illnesses had the highest levels of contamination. urban storm drains that only Bow into th<
Pending an announcement today,results of
ad never been confumof ocean during the rainy season. Health otfi.
the study have been closely held.
Haile enlisted dozens of college students last But officials at the Los Angeles County MalBhave long recommended against swim-
umner to comb the three beaches,interview- Department of Health Services already have min in the bay for at least 48 hours after
rg anyone who had put their face underwater significant rainfall.
i either the ocean or at various points new been billeted and have begun printing signs Santa Monica Bay Restoration Project offi.
arm strums.
water stms. A control group of that will be pasted near storm drains. They cials already are suggesting more studies
wbnmem was interviewed about 400 yards us more emphatic than previous messages, perhaps of surfers and lifeguards, targeting
way from the drains, locations at which the said Catherine Tyrrell, executive director of the health effects of repeated exposure «
:vets of bacteria and human viruses usually the Santa Monica Bay Restoration Project. polluted waters.
we found to be negligible. The new signs say:"Warning!Storm Drain The organization also is urging that the
The study found that those who swam near Water May Cause Illness. No Swimming." research be used to bolster efforts to investi-
re drains were well over 50% more likely to Previously, the signs cautioned bathers that gate and eliminate the sources of storm water
after fever or vomiting, for example, than storm water "may be contaminated" and pollution.That might Include the diversion of
rose who kept their distance from the urged no swimming. Health officials have some polluted runoff to sewage treatment
alluted runoff. agreed to post Bags new the signs to attract plants, where disease-causing organisms
In raw numbers,the survey projects that 373 the public's attention. could be eliminated, before discharging the
every 10,000 people (about 4%) swimming The warnings also will be printed in effluent into the ocean.
ear drains will contract at least one symp- Spanish, an important consideration because _i.en A eles City Council members Ruth
�m—cough. ear ailment, ere throat, fever, the survey found that Latinos, particularly Ga enter an Mrchae suer are woe
rills or some gastrointestinal disorder. children,are more likely to swim in and near o ay tl'7T oinuroatice a motion ca
"To put it another way, that means that if the polluted water. Officials speculated that -rver i ater [u the cny s
ru bring a classroom of 25 kids out there to the difference in usage of the contaminated shwa a reatmen a [ an requesting
vim in that polluted water, one of them is water might be linked to the dearth of crease tan [nil or im is education.
ring to gel at least one of these symptoms," publicity in the Latino community about Activists such as Heal the Bay's Gold said
.td Mark Cold, executive director of the storm water pollution. they hope that the findings will help 85 cities
ivirunmental group Heal the Bay and a While county lifeguards will not order in the county come to some agreement on a
•iving force behind the study. bathers out of polluted areas,they plan to"do plan to clean up the drains. That plan is due
While the survey used the swimmers [their] darndest to keep the people from for adoption July 15 but has been staged by
rarly a quarter of a mile from storm drains playing or swimming in that water." said bickering among the cities.
D
b
May 8, 1996
ME MORANDU
TO: All Districts'Employees
FROM: Donald F. McIntyre
General Manager
SUBJECT: HARASSMENT POLICY
It is the policy of the Districts to maintain a place of employment and a work environment that are safe,
productive, and free from general and sexual harassment. The Districts will not tolerate any form of
harassment. If you believe you are a victim of sexual or general harssment(see policy below), please
report such incidents to management immediately. Harassment or retaliation against those who report. or
are victimized by, such harassment will be subject to serious disciplinary action. Over the next few years,
additional training in recognizing and preventing sexual and general harassment will be required. The
following is a restatement of the Districts' policy:
The Districts will not tolerate sexual harassment in the workplace. Sexual Harassment may
include, but is not limited to, any of the following:
1. Sexual favors. Unwanted sexual advances which condition an employment benefit upon
exchange of sexual favors.
2. Hosdle work environment. Sexually-based verbal,physical or visual harassment of
such a nature and intensity that it creates an intimidating, hostile or offensive working
environment. Conduct that may result in a hostile work environment includes, but is not
limited to, the following:
A. Sexual epithets,jokes, derogatory comments orslurs;
B. Assault, impeding or blocking movement, or any physical interference with normal
work or movement when directed at an individual on the basis of sex;
C. Sexual cartoons, drawings,photgraphs or derogatory posters.
Any employee who believes that he or she has been the victim of sexual harassment should
immediately report the matter to his or her supervisor or manager, or to any other supervisor or
manager, including the General Manager. Complaints of sexual harassment will be promptly
investigated, and appropriate connective action will be taken.
MP
CSDOC 0 P.O.Soz 8127•Fountain Valley,CA 9272M127 0(714)952-2411
STATE OF CALIPORNIA ALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PETS WILSON. G..
CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER DUALITY CONTROL BOARD -
SANTA ANA REGION
V37 MAIN STREET. SUITE S00
RIVERSIDE, CA 925Dn3339
PHONE: (909) M413D
FAX: ( 091 781.6200
May 1, 1996
Mr. Donald F. Mcintyre CERTIFIED MAIL
General Manager RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
P.O. Box 8127
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92708-7018
ADMINISTRATIVE CIVIL LIABILITY - COMPLAINT NO. 96-53
Dear Mr. McIntyre:
Enclosed is a certified copy of Complaint No. 96-53 for Administrative Civil Liability
regarding the discharge of sewage to Newport Bay on February 22, 1996. A public
hearing on this matter has been scheduled for the May 31, 1996 Regional Board Meeting
at the California Tower, Highgrove Room (Room No. 200), 3737 Main Street, Riverside,
California. The staff report concerning the complaint and a meeting agenda will be mailed
to you prior to the hearing.
If you choose to waive your right to a hearing, please sign the enclosed waiver form and
submit it to this office prior to May 17, 1996 with a check or money order for the proposed
amount of civil liability ($50,000.00). The check or money order should be made payable
to the State Water Resources Control Board.
If you do not wish to waive your right to a hearing, we would suggest scheduling a pre-
hearing meeting at this office prior to May 17. At that time, you may wish to submit
information that may not have been previously available to staff regarding these incidents.
This information should address the following items:
1. Nature, circumstances, extent, and gravity of the violations;
2. Your ability to pay the proposed assessments;
3. Any prior history of violations;
4. Your degree of culpability;
Mr. McIntyre May 1, 1996
Complaint No. 96-53 Page -2-
5. Economic benefit or saving, if any, resulting from the violations, and
6. Such other matters as justice may require.
If you have any questions, please contact Mark Adelson, at 909-782-3234, Stephen D.
Mayville at 909-782-4992, or the Regional Board's staff counsel, Ted Cobb, at 916-657-
0406.
Sincerely,
Gera J. Thibeault
Executive Officer
Enclosure: Complaint No. 96-53 and "Waiver of Hearing" form
cc: w/enclosures
Regional Board
State Water Resources Control Board, Office of the Chief Counsel - Ted Cobb
State Water Resources Control Board, Division of Water Quality - Bruce Fujimoto
State Water Resources Control Board, Office of State-Wide Consistency- Denise Launey
San Bernardino County Flood Control/Transportation Department - Naresh Varma
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, Permits Issuance Section - Eugene
Bromley (W-5-1)
CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD
SANTA ANA REGION
IN THE MATTER OF; )
COMPLAINT NO. 96-53
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ) FOR
OF ORANGE COUNTY ) ADMINISTRATIVE CIVIL LIABILITY
108" ELLIS AVENUE )
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA )
92708-7018 - )
YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE THAT:
1. The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC) is alleged to have
violated provisions of law for which the California Regional Water Quality Control
Board, Santa Ana Region (hereinafter Board), may impose liability pursuant to
Section 13385 of the California Water Code (Water Code).
2. A hearing concerning this complaint will be held before the Board within 60 days
of the date of issuance of this complaint, unless CSDOC waives its right to a
hearing (waiver procedures are specified on page 4 of the complaint). If the
hearing in this matter is not waived, it will be held during the Board's regular
meeting on May 31, 1996 at the California Tower, Highgrove Room (Room No.
200). 3737 Main Street, Riverside, CA. The meeting begins at 9:00 a.m. CSDOC
or its representative will have an opportunity to appear and be heard and to
contest the allegations in this complaint and the imposition of civil liability by the
Board. An agenda for the meeting will be mailed to you not less than 10 days
before the hearing date.
3. If the May 31, 1996 hearing is held, the Board will consider whether to affirm,
reject, or modify the proposed administrative civil liability or whether to refer the
matter to the Attorney General for recovery of judicial civil liability.
4. You are alleged to have violated California Water Code Section 13376 by
discharging pollutants to navigable waters of the United States that are within the
state's jurisdiction without having filed a report of the discharge and without having
obtained waste discharge requirements adopted by the Board. Further, CSDOC
is alleged to have violated Order No. 84-1, NPDES No. CA0110604, Waste
Discharge Requirements, specifically, General Provisions of the Order which
so \Snv stgt\csdcc\comJant.acl-2
Complaint No. 96-53 -2- May 1, 1996
prohibit discharges from "causing injury to the property of others,' and by failing
to provide adequate operations staff training.
5. This complaint is based on the fallowing facts:
A) The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC) owns and
operates hundreds of miles of interceptor sewers and 26 sewage lift
stations (SLS) that contribute an average of 243 MGD (million gallons per
day) to CSDOC's two regional sewage treatment plants.
B) On February 21, 1996, a pump control mechanism malfunctioned at the Bay
Bridge SLS (located in the vicinity of the intersection of Pacific Coast
Highway and Bayside Drive in Newport Beach) which caused its pumps to
shut down between 10:12 p.m. on February 21, 1996 and approximately
6:30 a.m. on February 22, 1996 (approximately an 8 hour period).
C) According to CSDOC's estimates, the Bay Bridge SLS shut down resulted
in the discharge of approximately 41,000 gallons of raw sewage from the
interceptor sewer system into Newport Bay, a navigable water of the United
States, and into 18 private residences, in violation of Order No. 84-1.
Board staff is in agreement with this estimate.
D) It is likely that most of the raw sewage entering the residences eventually
entered Newport Bay. It was reported that residence owners were forced
to dispose of the sewage entering their homes by bailing it out either to
their yards, where it could runoff to Newport Bay, or directly to the Bay.
E) CSDOC could not cleanup the raw sewage discharged to Newport Bay.
The effects of the raw sewage discharged to the residences were mitigated
by professional cleaning companies retained by the residence owners.
CSDOC is working with the owners of the 18 residences to settle claims for
their cleanup and restoration expenses.
F) The raw sewage discharged to Newport Bay resulted in a condition of
pollution in the Bay. Approximately two miles of Newport Bay between
Linda Isle, Harbor Island, and Balboa Island and the mainland was closed
to the public for three days to restrict water contact recreation.
G) The Bay Bridge SLS is equipped with sophisticated monitoring equipment
which enables CSDOC staff to continuously monitorthe station's operational
status.
sdn%inv stgtl csdoc\complant.ecl-3
Complaint No. 96-53 -3- May 1, 1996
H) Responsible CSDOC staff at the Plant No. 1 control center failed to respond
to the monitoring system's warning of the Bay Bridge SLS shut down. This
failure to respond was due to inadequate training of the CSDOC staff. It is
reasonable to expect that had adequate training been provided, CSDOC
staff would have recognized the severity of the station's operational status
and the need for a response based on consideration of the following:
1) The Bay Bridge SLS was designated by CSDOC as a critical pump
station; and
2) The zero discharge flow condition registered by the monitoring system
for the Bay Bridge SLS during the entire 8-hour period was highly
atypical. Historic flow characteristics for the Bay Bridge SLS show that
the discharge rarely falls below 1.8 MGD between mid-night and 6:00
a.m. during a week day.
6. Pursuant to Water Code Section 13385. those who violate Water Code Section
13376 are liable civilly. As provided by Water Code Section 13385, the Board
can edministratively assess a civil liability of an amount not to exceed the sum of
both of the following:
A) Ten thousand dollars ($10,000) for each day in which the violation occurs;
and,
B) Where there is a discharge, any portion of which is not susceptible to
cleanup or is not cleaned up, and the volume discharged but not cleaned
up exceeds 1,OOD gallons, an additional liability not to exceed ten dollars
($10) times the number of gallons by which the volume discharged but not
cleaned up exceeds 1,000 gallons.
7. The maximum liability for the violations cited above is $410,000 which is
comprised of:
A) $10,000 for one day of violation; and
B) $400,000 for the estimated 40,000 gallons (41,000 gallons minus 1,000
gallons) of spilled sewage, which was not susceptible to cleanup.
8. Section 13385(e)specifies factors that the Board shall consider in establishing the
amount of civil liability. After consideration of those factors, the Executive Officer
proposes civil liability be imposed on County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
by the Board in the amount of $50,000 for the violations cited above.
sdmllnv s[g[\csdoc\corn lan[.acl-4
Complaint No. 96-53 -4- May 1, 1996
WAIVER OF HEARING
You may waive your right to a hearing. If you waive your right to a hearing, please sign
the attached waiver and return it together with a cashier's check made payable to the
State Water Resources Control Board in the amount of the civil liability proposed in
paragraph 8 above. Send the check and waiver to:
Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board
3737 Main Street, Suite 500
Riverside, CA 92501-3339
If you have any questions regarding this complaint, please contact Gerard J. Thibeault
at (909) 782-3284, Stephen D. Mayville at (909) 782-4992, Mark Adelson at (909) 782-
3234, or contact the Regional Board's staff counsel, Ted Cobb, at (916) 657-0406.
s/A XN
Date Gerkd J. Thibeault
Executive Officer
admllnv scgc lcsdx%Complm[.acl-5
CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD
SANTA ANA REGION
IN THE MATTER OF: )
COMPLAINT NO. 96-53
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ) FOR
OF ORANGE COUNTY ) ADMINISTRATIVE CIVIL LIABILITY
108" ELLIS AVENUE )
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA )
92708-7018 )
WAIVER OF HEARING
The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC) agrees to waive its right to
a hearing before the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board with regard to
violations alleged in Complaint No. 96-53. CSDOC has enclosed a cashiers check made
payable to the State Water Resources Control Board in the amount of $50,000 in
settlement of Complaint No. 96-53. CSDOC understands that it is giving up its right to
be heard and to argue against allegations made by the Executive Officer in this
complaint, and against the imposition of, and the amount of, the civil liability.
Date for the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Pertinent Facts and Key Statistics - FY 95-96
July 1 , 1995 through March 31 , 1996
General Information
Year of Formation: 1948
Year Began Operation: 1954
Form of Government: County Sanitation Districts
Authority: Section 4700 et seq, California Health and Safety Code
Operating Authority: NPDES 301(h) Permit No. CA0110604
Governing Agencies: EPA, Region IX & California Regional Water Quality Control Board
Number of Districts: 9
Number of Board Members: 29
Service Area: 471 sq. miles
Number of Cities Served: 23
Approximate Service Area Population: 2.2 million
Wastewater Treatment Plants: Reclamation Plant No. 1 & Treatment Plant No. 2
Total Miles of Trunk Sewers: 650
Number of Operating Off-Site Pumping Stations: 22
Number of Authorized Employees: 673
Number of Waste Discharge Permits: 994
Total Number of Odor Complaints - Both Plants, FY 1994-95: 2
Operations/Treatment Information
9-month Average Daily Flow(Influent) Plant No. 1: 77.8 MGD
Plant No. 2: 158.6 MGD
9-month Average Daily Flow Total Combined Influent: 236.4 MGD
Primary Treatment Capacity (Including Standby) Plant No. 1: 108 MGD
Plant No. 2: 186 MGD
Total: 294 MGD
Secondary Treatment Capacity Plant No. 1: 66 MGD
Plant No. 2: 90 MGD
Total: 156 MGD
Ocean Outfall Booster Station (GOBS) Pumping Capacity: 480 MGD
Additional OOBS Standby Pumping Capacity: 120 MGD
Daily Average Biosolids Production Plant No. 1 @ 19.2 Solids: 87 WTPD
In Wet Tons Per Day (WTPD) 7 Days a Week Plant No. 2 @ 21.7 Solids: 363 WTPD
Total: 550 WTPD
Daily Average Biosolids Recycled (All Direct-Land Application): 550 WTPD
Monthly Average Biosolids Truck Loads- Both Plants: 597
Average Wet Tons of Biosolids Per Truck Load 25.8 Wet Tons
Monthly Average Biosolids Management Costs $391,000
Monthly Average Grit and Screenings Disposal Total - Both Plants: 157 Wet Tons
May 1996 1
Fiscal Year 1995-96 Pertinent Facts and Key Statistics (continued)
Influent and Effluent Flow Constituents—Combined Monthly Averaces: 7-1-95 to 3-31-96
Fmuent
Constituent Influent Effluent Permit Limit
Total Biochemical Oxygen Demand (TBOD) 230.0 mg/L 80.0 mg/L 100.0 mg/L
Grease and Oil 50.0 mg/L 14.3 mg/L 25.0 mg/L
Total Suspended Solids (TSS) 223.0 mg/L 46.0 mg/L 60.0 mg/L
Settleable Solids (SE) N/A 0.6 mUL 1.0 mUL
Ammonia 22.0 mg/L 23.0 mg/L 30.0 mg/L
PH 7.6 7.6 6-9
Financial I n fO1M a tl OQ
Fees and Charges:
One-Time Single-Family Residence Connection: $2,350
Average Annual Single-Family Residence Sewer Service Fee: $71
Average Property Tax Share (2.8% of 1% of Assessed Value @$100,000): $28
Average Single-Family Residence Total Sewer Bill: $99
Average Operations and Maintenance Cost to Treat One Million Gallons of Wastewater:
FY 1994-95: $538
FY 1995-96 Budget(Revised): $599
FY 1995-96 (as of March 31, 1996): $553
CENTRAL POWER GENERATION RECAP (First Nine Months of FY 95-96):
Cost of Electricity if Purchased @ $.080 per kWh — Both Plants: $5,831.652
(Not Including Plant No. 1 Administration Bldg., Control Center and Laboratory)
Standby Interconnection and Maintenance Charges (So. Cal. Edison): ($272,784)
Export Power Sales to Southern California Edison: $321,120
Natural Gas Costs (Both Plants): ($657,640)
L
M Costs to Operate Central Power Generation Plants: ($1,659,044)
QMD Permit Fees and Emission Fee Reduction: $30,000
ding Heating and Cooling Savings: 00Savings by Generating Our Own Power (July 1 ,1995 to March 31, 1996): $3,893,307
Electricity Costs (Plant No. 1 Admin Bldg., Laboratory and Control Center): $276,518
Potable and Recycled Water Costs — Both Plants: $485,037
Joint Treatment Works Operating Budget for Fiscal Year 1995-96: $54,380,000
Capital Improvement Budget for Fiscal Year 1995-96: - $33,530,000
Fixed.Assets as of 03/31/96 (At Cost): $1,069,403,000
Original Outstanding Certificates Of Participation (COP) Issues:
December 1990 New Money: $100,000,000
May 1991 New Money: $117,555,000
September 1992 New Money: $ 98,500,000
December 1992 Refunding: $160,600,000
September 1993 Refunding: $ 46.000,000
Outstanding COP Balance as of 03/31196: $384,618,000
Outstanding General Obligation Bonds Balance as of 03131196: $45,000
May 1996 2
ti
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
RESULTS OF COMMUNICATIONS AUDIT
Question 1: How long have you been with the Districts?
Under 1 year 6%
1-5 years 31%
6 - 10 years 41%
11 - 15 years 12%
16 -20 years 6%
Over 20 years 5%
Question 2: Which of the following describes your job classification?
Administrative/Clerical 21%
Professional 18%
Technical 18%
Supervisor/Manager 16%
Maintenance 16%
Operators 6%
Department Head 2%
Question 3: We've gone through some tough years at the Districts but I
think things are improving.
Strongly agree 6%
Agree 33%
Somewhat agree 38%
Disagree 19%
Strongly disagree 4%
Question 4: Morale at the Districts is improving.
Strongly agree 1%
Agree 17%
Somewhat agree 40%
Disagree 35%
Strongly Disagree 7%
r
Question 5: Communications at the Districts is im rovin .
Strongly agree 7%
Agree 28%
Somewhat A ree 42%
Disagree 21%
Strongly disagree 2%
Question 6: The Districts cares about me and what I think.
Strongly agree 4%
Agree 23%
Somewhat agree 39%
Disagree 28%
Strongly disagree 6%
Question 7: If I have a question about a policy or procedure, I know where
to get an answer.
Strongly agree 6%
Agree 44%
Somewhat agree 34%
Disagree 14%
Strongly Disagree 2%
Question 8: The Districts' mission, goals and objectives have been clearly
communicated to me.
Strongly agree 9%
Agree 42%
Somewhat agree 34%
Disagree 13%
Strongly disagree 2%
Question 9: The Districts is a good place to work.
Strongly agree 24%
Agree 49%
Somewhat agree 23%
Disagree 4%
Strongly Disagree 3%
Question 10: 1 usually receive information about what's going on at the Districts
from: (1 = Highest Ranking)
My su ervisorimana er 1
My fellow employees 2
De artmentldivision meetings 3
Memos 4
The News Pipeline 5
The grapevine 6
Rumors 17
The NEWSLine 18
Newspapers 19
Question 11: I would rather receive information about the Districts from:
(1 = Highest Ranking)
My su ervisortmana er 1
Department/division meetings 2
Memos 3
The News Pipeline 4
The NEWSLine 5
My fellow employees 6
The grapevine 7
Newspapers 8
Rumors 9
Question 12: Please rank the following list of communication sources for
importance and accuracy: (1 = Highest Ranking)
Importance Accuracy
My su ervisor/mana er 1 1
Department/division meetings 2 2
Memos 3 3
The News Pipeline 4 4
The NEWSLine 5 5
My fellow employees 6 6
Newspapers 7 8
The grapevine 8 7
Rumors 9 9
Question 13: The amount of information I receive on the Districts' future plans
is:
Too Much 4%
Too Little 54%
Just Right 38%
No Answer 4%
Question 14: The amount of information I receive on the Districts' policies and
procedures is:
Too Much 6%
Too Little 54%
Just Right 35%
No Answer 5%
Question 15: The amount of information I receive on proposed expansion
change in the Districts' operation is:
Too Much 4%
Too Little 64%
Just Right 26%
No Answer 6%
Question 16: The amount of information I receive on management philosophy
is:
Too Much 11%
Too Little 50%
Just Right 26%
No Answer 13%
Question 17: The amount of information I receive on job related information is:
Too Much 1%
Too Little 50%
Just Right 43%
No Answer 6%
Question 18: The amount of information 1 receive on job advancement
opportunities is:
Too Much 0%
Too Little 53%
Just Ri ht 37%
No Answer 10%
Question 19: The amount of information /receive on the effect of external
issues on my job is:
Too Much 2%
Too Little 62%
Just Right 21%
No Answer 15%
Question 20: The amount of information I receive on news of other
departments/divisions is:
Too Much 2%
Too Little 64%
Just Right 25%
No Answer 9%
Question 21: The amount of information I receive on the Districts' stand on
current issues is:
Too Much 0%
Too Little 64%
Just Right 26%
No Answer 10%
Question 22: The amount of information I receive on the Districts' community
involvement is:
Too Much 1%
Too Little 51%
Just Right 37%
No Answer 11%
Question 23: The amount of information I receive on personnel
changes/promotions is:
Too Much 2%
Too Little 35%
Just Right 59%
No Answer 4%
Question 24: The amount of information I receive on human interest news on
co-workers is:
Too Much 3%
Too Little 33%
Just Ri ht 55%
No Answer 9%
Question 25: The amount of information I receive ongeneral Districts' news is:
Too Much 2%
Too Little 41%
Just Right 53%
No Answer 4%
Question 26: How would you rate the overall content of The News Pipeline?
Excellent 18%
Good 61%
Fair 19%
Poor 2%
Question 27: When you receive The News Pi eline, how much do you read?
Almost all of it 79%
About half of it 9%
Only selected articles 9%
Little, if any, of it 3%
Question 28: Does The News Pipeline keep you up-to-date with the
Districts' news?
Always 9%
Most of the time 57%
Sometimes 31%
Rarely 3%
Question 29: Do you think The News Pipeline maintains a good balance of
information?
Always 9%
Most of the time 61%
Sometimes 26%
Rarely 4%
Question 30: Would you like to see The News Pipeline expanded?
Yes 70%
No 30%
Question 31: How often would you like to see The News Pipeline
distributed?
Bi-weeklyas it is now) 82%
Monthly 16%
Quarter) 2%
Question 32: Would you like to see an employee newsletter that has more
department features and stories about fellow employees?
Yes 62%
No 38%
Question 33: How frequently do you call the NEWSLine?
Once a week 11%
Every other week 6%
Once a month 41%
Never 42%
Question 34: Did you attend last summer's Family Day?
Yes 29%
No 71%
Question 35: Did you attend last summer's CSDOC Picnic?
Yes 16%
No 84%
Question 36: Did you attend the CSDOC Holiday Party?
Yes 18%
No 82%
Question 37: Would you like to see more events like Family Day?
Yes 63%
No 37%
COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS. 1 , 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 , 13 AND 14
OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
MINUTES
JOINT BOARD MEETING
APRIL 24, 1996
RICTS OFo99�✓
hQe � co
c
a y
2 �
J a
��FCl�NC�THE
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018
ROLL CALL
A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7, 11, 13 and 14 of
Orange County,California,Was held on April 24, 1996,at 7:30 p.m., in the Districts'Administrative Offices. Following the
Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll Was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1,2,
3,5,6,7, 11, 13,and 14 as follows:
ACTIVE ALTERNATE
DIRECTORS DIRECTORS
DISTRICT NO.1: x Pat McGuigan,Chair Ted R. Moreno
g James M.Ferryman,Chair pro tem _ Arthur Perry
• Mark Murphy Joanne Coontz
g Thomas R.Sekarelli Jim Potts
_• Roger Stanton William G. Steiner
DISTRICT NO.2: g John Collins,Chair George Scott
x Daniel T.Welch,Chair pro tam John M.Gullorson
g Berry Dense Bob Bell
g Bumie Dunlap Glenn Parker
g Norman Z.Eckenrode Carol Downey
x James H.Flom Steve Anderson
x Pat McGuigan _ Ted R.Moreno
x Mark Murphy Joanne Coontz
x Chris Norby Don Bankhead
x Sheldon Singer George L.Zlaket
x Roger Stanton William G. Steiner
x Bob Zemel Tom Day
DISTRICT NO.3: x Sal A Sapien,Chair Harry M. Dotson
g Bumie Dunlap,Chair pro tam Glenn Parker
g Walter Bowmen Gail Kerry
x George Brown Marilyn Bruce Hastings
x John Collins George Scott
x James H.Flora Steve Anderson
g Don R. Griffin _ Patsy Marshall
x Victor Leipzig _ Ralph Bauer
_ x Wally Linn _ Eva G. Miner
x Pat McGuigan _ Ted R.Moreno
_x Chris Norby _ Don Bankhead
x Margie L.Rice _ James V.Evans
x Sheldon Singer _ George L Zlaket
�x Roger Stanton _ William G.Steiner
x Charles Sylvia _ Robert Wohlstrom
x Bob Zemel _ Tom Day
DISTRICT NO.6: _ Jan Debay,Chair x John C. Cox,Jr.
William G.Steiner g Roger Stanton,Chair pro tam
x John C.Cox,Jr. _ Jan Debay
DISTRICT NO.e: g James M.Ferrymen,Chair _ Arthur Perry
Jan Debay x John C.Cox,Jr.
William G.Steiner x Roger Stanton,Chair pro tam
DISTRICT NO.7: x Barry Hammond,Chair Mike Ward
x Thomas R.Saltarelll,Chair pro tam _ Jim Potts
Jan Debay x John C.Cox,Jr.
g James M. Ferryman _ Arthur Perry
g Pat McGuigan _ Ted R. Moreno
g Mark A Murphy _ Joanne Coontz
William G.Steiner x Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO.11: x Victor Leipzig,Chair _ Ralph Bauer
—xL Shirley Deti Chair pro tam _ Ralph Bauer
_X_ Roger Stanton _ William G. Steiner
DISTRICT NO.13: x John M.Gullhaon,Chair _ Daniel T.Welch
g Bob Zemel,Chair pro tam _ Tom Day
g Bumie Dunlap Glenn Parker
_x Mark Murphy _ Joanne Coontz
William G.Steiner x Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO.14: g Thomas R.Sallarelli,Chair _ Jim Potts
x Mark A Murphy,Chair pro tam _ Joanne Coontz
g Barry Hammond Mike Ward
William G.Steiner __X__ Roger Stanton
Pear A.Swan Darryl Miller
_2_
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Minutes
4/24/96
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Blake P. Anderson, Assistant General Manager-
Operations, Judith A. Wilson, Assistant General
Manager-Administration, Penny Kyle, Board
Secretary, Janet Gray, Irwin Haycock, Ed Hodges,
Patricia Jonk, David Ludwin, Mike Moore, Bob Dolan,
Mike Peterman, Gary Streed, Michelle Tuchman,
Nancy Wheatley, Paula Zeller
OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Bill Knopf,
Mary Lee
DISTRICT 5
Appointment of Chair pro tem
In the absence of Chair Jan Debay and Chair pro tern William Steiner, Director
Roger Stanton was appointed Chair pro tem of District No. 5.
DISTRICT 6
Appointment of Chair pro tern
In the absence of Chair James Ferryman and Chair pro tem Jan Debay, Director
Roger Stanton was appointed Chair pro tern of District No. 6.
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the Joint Chair
The Joint Chair informed Board Members that Director Margie Rice's son had
passed away following a recent heart transplant, and extended sympathy to
Margie and her family.
The Joint Chair reported that due to a fall that severely injured her kneecap,
Director Jan Debay had undergone surgery. He advised that she was now
recuperating at home.
As Don McIntyre was in Cleveland, Ohio, attending a ULI Spring Meeting, Joint
Chair Cox advised that Blake Anderson would be covering for Don until his return
this Monday.
The following tentatively scheduled upcoming meetings were then announced as
follows:
-3-
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Minutes
4124/96
Operations, Maintenance, and Technical Services Committee -
Wednesday, May 1, at 5:30 p.m.
Planning, Design, and Construction Committee -Thursday, May 2, at
5:30 p.m.
Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee -
Wednesday, May 8, at 5:30 p.m.
Executive Committee -Wednesday, May 15, at 5:30 p.m.
Steering Committee - Wednesday, May 22, at 5:30 p.m.
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of General Manaaer
Blake Anderson advised that at the Strategic Planning Workshop scheduled for
May 4 at the Districts' Administrative Offices, Bill Mills, General Manager for the
Orange County Water District, would be the keynote speaker on the topic of
Regional Water Reclamation Project. An open panel discussion would then
commence on the Districts' strategic planning efforts.
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of General Counsel
Tom Woodruff spoke on the status of Assembly Bill 2109. He referenced the
position of the Districts as detailed in his memorandum dated April 18, 1996 to
the Joint Chair and Board Members.
Mr. Woodruff advised that a Closed Session would not be necessary, and
informed the Boards that trial was set for June 3, 1996 re Andy C. Patterson, at
al., v. County Sanitation Districts. The Louis Sangermano case has been
continued by the Court until September 1996. Of all the Bayside Drive Pump
Station spill claims, he stated that only one claim, that of Donna Anderson,
would require more efforts to settle.
DISTRICT 1
Approval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular
meeting held March 27, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed
approved, as mailed. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention
from voting on this matter be made a matter of record.
-4-
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Minutes
4/24/96
DISTRICT 2
Approval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular
meeting held March 27, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed
approved, as mailed. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention
from voting on this matter be made a matter of record.
DISTRICT 3
Approval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular
meeting held March 27, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed
approved, as mailed. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention
from voting on this matter be made a matter of record.
DISTRICT 5
Approval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular
meeting held March 27, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed
approved, as mailed. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention
from voting on this matter be made a matter of record.
DISTRICT 6
Aporoval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular
meeting held March 27, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed
approved, as mailed. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention
from voting on this matter be made a matter of record.
DISTRICT 7
Approval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular
meeting held March 27, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed
approved, as mailed. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention
from voting on this matter be made a matter of record.
-5-
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Minutes
4/24196
DISTRICT 11
Approval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular
meeting held March 27, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed
approved, as mailed. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention
from voting on this matter be made a matter of record.
DISTRICT 13
Approval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular
meeting held March 27, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed
approved, as mailed. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention
from voting on this matter be made a matter of record.
DISTRICT 14
Approval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular
meeting held March 27, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed
approved, as mailed. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention
from voting on this matter be made a matter of record.
ALL DISTRICTS
Ratification of payment of Joint and
Individual District Claims
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That payment of Joint and Individual District claims set forth on exhibits "A" ,
"B", and "C", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and
summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the
amounts so indicated.
-6-
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Minutes
4/24/96
ALL DISTRICTS 03/20/96 04/03/96 MISC.
Joint Operating Fund - $ 761,338.90 $583,982.67 $2,671.47
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 1,143,601.05 355,959.46 1,396.66
Joint Working Capital Fund - 162.481.48 507,201.07 590.66
Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 58,550.50 51,041.23 22,381.81
DISTRICT NO, 1 - 0.00 0.00 0.00
DISTRICT NO, 2 - 230.46 3,385.59 0.00
DISTRICT NO. 3 24,212.17 613,519.59 0.00
DISTRICT NO. 5 - 0.00 115,683.00 0.00
DISTRICT NO. 6 - 0.00 0.00 0.00
DISTRICT NO. 7 - 7,997.97 7,795.19 90.00
DISTRICT NO. 11 - 8,915.86 17,499.94 0.00
DISTRICT NO. 13 - 0.00 0.00 0.00
DISTRICT NO, 14 - 0.00 1,714.76 0.00
DISTRICTS NOS. 5 8 6 JOINT - 0.00 209,852.48 0.00
DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 0.00 6,822.36 0.00
DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 0.00 5.856.10 0.00
$2.167.328.39 $2.480.313.44 27130.60
ALL DISTRICTS
Ratifying staff action in issuino a
Purchase order re Specification No, C-035
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the action of staff in issuing a purchase order to Neutron Products, Inc.,
second low bid for Purchase of Anionic Polyelectrolyte Chemical Polymer,
Specification No. C-035, from January 25, 1996 through April 24, 1996, for
purchase of polymer at the approximate total price of$35,000.00, including sales
tax, and requiring Polypure, Inc. (lowest bid and recipient of contract for
Specification No. C-035), to reimburse to the Districts the cost difference of
approximately $9,000.00, including sales tax, due to Polypure, Inc.'s failure to
supply polymer as required by Specification No. C-035 approved by the Boards of
Directors on July 26, 1995, be, and is hereby, ratified.
-7-
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Minutes
4/24/96
ALL DISTRICTS
Awardina Purchase of Sodium Hypochlorite
Solution, Soecification No. C-040. to Western
States Chemical, Inc.
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 9642, receiving and
filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Purchase of
Sodium Hypochlorite Solution, Specification No. C-040, to Western States
Chemical, Inc., for the delivered price of$.455 per gallon, plus sales tax, for a
one-year period beginning May 14, 1996, with option for four one-year extensions
upon mutually-agreeable terms. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby
made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS
Awardina Purchase and Installation of
Information Technoloov Trailer Complex,
Specification No. E-265A. to Brandall
Modular Corporation
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 9643, receiving and
filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Purchase and
Installation of Information Technology Trailer Complex, Specification No. E-265A,
to Brandall Modular Corporation for an amount not to exceed $275,700.00,
including sales tax; and authorizing an additional amount not to exceed $5,136.00
for the cost of Labor & Material and Faithful Performance Bonds, as deemed
necessary by General Counsel. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby
made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive and file draft minutes of the
Steering Committee
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the draft minutes of the Steering Committee meeting held on March 27,
1996, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed.
-8-
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Minutes
4/24/96
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive and file draft minutes of the Operations.
Maintenance. and Technical Services Committee
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the draft minutes of the Operations, Maintenance, and Technical Services
Committee meeting held on April 3, 1996, be, and are hereby, received and
ordered filed.
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive and file draft minutes of the Planning.
Design. and Construction Committee
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the draft minutes of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee
meeting held on April 4, 1996, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed.
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive and file draft minutes of the Finance. Administration.
and Human Resources Committee
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the draft minutes of the Finance, Administration, and Human Resources
Committee meeting held on April 10, 1996, be, and are hereby, received and
ordered filed.
ALL DISTRICTS
Verbal report from Chair of Operations
Maintenance. and Technical Services
Committee re April 3. 1996 meeting
Verbal report
Director Pat McGuigan, Chair of the Operations, Maintenance, and Technical
Services Committee, gave a brief verbal report on the items being recommended
for approval.
-9-
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Minutes
4/24/96
ALL DISTRICTS (OMT896-008)
Authorizing a 1996 Summer Work Proaram
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That a 1996 Summer Work Program for painting, tunnel maintenance, grounds
maintenance, and pump station maintenance work at an estimated amount of
$140,000.00, be, and is hereby, authorized.
ALL DISTRICTS
Verbal report from Chair of Plannina. Design.
and Construction Committee re Aoril 4. 1996
meeting
Verbal reoort
Director John Collins, Chair of the Planning, Design and Construction
Committee, gave a brief verbal report on the items being recommended for
approval.
ALL DISTRICTS (PDC96-15)
Approving plans and specifications re Job
Nos. P1-40-2 and P2-47-2
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 96-44, approving plans
and specifications for Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 1,
Job No. P1-40-2, and Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 2,
Job No. P2-47-2, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for
receipt of bids. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of
these minutes.
-10-
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Minutes
4/24/96
ALL DISTRICTS (PDC96-16)
Actions re Comoressed Natural Gas
Refueling Station, Job No. P1-51
Approving plans and specifications
re Job No. P1-51
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 9645, approving
plans and specifications for Compressed Natural Gas Refueling Station, Job
No. P1-51, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for
receipt of bids.
Authorizing the General Manager to
award construction contract to
lowest resoonsible bidder
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to award a
construction contract to the lowest responsible bidder for Compressed
Natural Gas Refueling Station, Job No. P1-51, for an amount not to exceed
$436,074.00.
ALL DISTRICTS
Verbal report from Chair of Finance.
Administration. and Human Resources
Committee re April 10, 1996 meeting
Verbal report
Director George Brown, Chair of the Finance, Administration, and Human
Resources Committee, gave a brief verbal report on the items being
recommended for approval.
_11_
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Minutes
4124/96
ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR96-231
Receive and file Treasurer's Report
for the month of February 1996
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Treasurer's Report for the month of February 1996, be, and is hereby,
received and ordered filed.
ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR96-24)
Authorized staff to make supplier name
changes to Board-approved purchases
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That a policy allowing staff to make supplier name changes to Board-approved
purchases, be, and is hereby, authorized.
ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR96-25)
Actions re 1996-97 Sewer Use Fees.
Connection Fees. and Annexation Fees
Increasing the 1996-97 Sewer Connection
Fees and 1996-97 Annexation Fees
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the 1996-97 Sewer Connection Fees and 1996-97 Annexation Fees, in
accordance with the Engineering News Record - Los Angeles Construction
Cost Index, be, and are hereby, increased.
Director John M. Gullixson requested that his opposition to the motion be
made a matter of record.
Declaring that 1996-97 Sewer Use Fees
remain unchanged from the 1995-96 rates
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby declare that the 1996-97 Sewer Use
Fees remain unchanged from the 1995-96 rates.
-12-
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Minutes
4/24/96
ALL DISTRICTS
Status report re County's Commingled Investment Pool
Blake Anderson advised Board Members that the action re Ballot for Accepting or
Rejecting the County of Orange Plan of Adjustment regarding the Chapter 9
Bankruptcy was ministerial in nature, in that it simply confirms what the Boards
have previously acted upon and approved, namely, the Joint Settlement
Agreement. He also reported concerning the distribution which has been made to
the Districts of the pre-bankruptcy funds previously held by the County. With the
Option B participants having completed their negotiations, staff recommended that
the General Manager be authorized to sign the Ballot.
ALL DISTRICTS
Authorizing the General Manager to execute
the Ballot for Accepting or Rejectino Debtor's
(County of Orange) Plan of Adiustment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to execute the Ballot for
Accepting or Rejecting Debtor's (County of Orange) Plan of Adjustment regarding
the Chapter 9 Bankruptcy pending before the United States Bankruptcy Court,
Central District of California.
Director Don R. Griffin requested that his abstention to the motion be made a
matter of record.
ALL DISTRICTS (PDC96-04)
Actions re Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers 3. 4. and 5
at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-41: Seismic Retrofit of
Non-Structural Systems at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-43:
Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 1. Job No. P144:
Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers D through O
at Plant No. 2, Job No. P248: Seismic Retrofit of
Non-Structural Systems at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-50:
Seismic Retrofit at Plant No 2 Job No P2-53-2 Tunnel
Cover Replacement at Billings Tunnel at Plant No. 2.
SP19950021 and Sludge Piping Modification Primary
Sedimentation Basins 6-15 SP199500597
Verbal report of Director of Engineering
David Ludwin provided the Directors with a brief report on the project.
-13-
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Minutes
4/24/96
Following a brief discussion, Director Sal Sapien requested that in-depth
staff reports be provided to more fully inform Directors on major projects.
Director John Collins stated that the Planning, Design, and Construction
Committee had thoroughly reviewed, discussed, and approved the project.
Judy Wilson, Assistant General Manager-Administration, noted that the
project was ready to be bid. In the future, she advised that staff would be
prepared to give detailed information to Directors at the Joint Boards
meeting when major projects are initially placed on an agenda.
Approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for said projects,
changing the date for receipt of bids from March 12, 1996 to March 26,
1996, be, and is hereby, approved.
Approving Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications for said projects,
making miscellaneous technical clarifications, be, and is hereby, approved.
Deleting Conveyor Belt Access at Solids
Storage Plant No. 2. SP1995003. from the
Plans and specifications
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That Conveyor Belt Access at Solids Storage Plant No. 2, SP1995003, be,
and is hereby, deleted from the plans and specifications.
-14-
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Minutes
4/24/96
Awarding contract to Margate Construction Inc
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 96-46, receiving
and filing bid tabulation and recommendation, awarding contract for
Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers 3, 4, and 5 at Plant No. 1, Job
No. 121-41, Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Plant No. 1, Job
No. P143; Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-44; Rehabilitation of
Primary Clarifiers D Through Q at Plant No. 2, Job No. P248; Seismic
Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-50; Seismic
Retrofit at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53-2; Tunnel Cover Replacement at
Billings Tunnel at Plant No. 2, SP19950021; and Sludge Piping Modification
at Primary Sedimentation Basins 6-15, SP19950059, to Margate
Construction, Inc. in the total amount of$8,461,138.00. Said resolution, by
reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
Director Sal Sapien requested that his opposition to the motion be made a
matter of record.
DISTRICTS 2.3.5.7 & 11
Receive and file draft minutes of the
Selection Committee
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the draft minutes of the Selection Committee held on February 29, 1996, be,
and are hereby, received and ordered filed.
DISTRICTS 2.3.5.7 & 11
Approving Professional Services Agreement with
Mangan. Inc. for preparation of an Electrical Area
Classifications Study Report for Miscellaneous
Improvements and Rehabilitation of Outlying
Pump Stations, Contract No. 2-37
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee with Mangan,
Inc. for preparation of an Electrical Area Classifications Study Report for
Miscellaneous Improvements and Rehabilitation of Outlying Pump Stations,
Contract No. 2-37, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed, and approved; and,
-15-
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Minutes
4124/96
FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution
No. 96-47, approving said agreement with Mangan, Inc. for said services, on an
hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, direct expenses, subconsultant fees,
and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $52,120.00. Said resolution, by
reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 1
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be
adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:15 p.m.
DISTRICT 2
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be
adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:15 p.m.
DISTRICT 3
AdJ'oumment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be
adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:15 p.m.
DISTRICT 5
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be
adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:15 p.m.
-16-
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Minutes
4/24/96
DISTRICT 6
Adiournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be
adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:15 p.m.
DISTRICT 7
Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans
and specifications for Contract Nos. 7-22 and
7-24
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Parallel and
Replacement of Portions of Lemon Heights Subtrunk Sewer, La Colina Drive to
Newport Boulevard, Contract No. 7-22, and Manhole Access Modifications to
RA-14 Sewer at Newport Boulevard and Cowan Heights Drive, Contract No. 7-24,
authorizing an addition of$213,547.19 to the contract with Calfon Construction,
Inc., for five items of additional work, and granting a time extension of eight
calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved.
DISTRICT 7
Ordering Annexation No. 142 - Kendler Annexation
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 96-48-7, ordering
annexation of 1.28 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity southeast of the
intersection of Orange Park Boulevard and Clark Street in unincorporated County
territory (Annexation No. 142 - Kendler Annexation to County Sanitation District
No. 7). Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these
minutes.
-17-
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Minutes
4/24/96
DISTRICT 7
Orderino Annexation No. 147 - Beshoff Annexation
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 96-49-7, ordering
annexation of .886 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity south of the
intersection of Lower Lake Drive and Lake Court in unincorporated County
territory (Annexation No. 147 - Beshoff Annexation to County Sanitation District
No. 7). Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these
minutes.
DISTRICT 7
Receive and file request for annexation
authorizing initiation proceedings re proposed
Annexation No 151 - Goodman Annexation
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the request from Lawrence and Sharlene Goodman for annexation of
1.01 acres of territory to the District, in the vicinity southeast of the intersection of
Santiago Canyon Road and Kennymead Street in unincorporated County territory,
be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution
No. 96-50-7, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to the
District (proposed Annexation No. 151 - Goodman Annexation to County
Sanitation District No. 7). Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a
part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 7
Journment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be
adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:15 p.m.
-18-
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Minutes
4124196
DISTRICT 11
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be
adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:15 p.m.
DISTRICT 13
Journment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be
adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:15 p.m.
DISTRICT 14
Adiournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be
adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:15 p.m.
Secretary of tU Bo s of Directors
of County Sanitati istricts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14
_19_
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 03/19/96 PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 0320/96 POSTING DATE 0320MS
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
150635 ABM BUSINESS MACHINES, INC. $30.17 OFFICE EQUIPMENT REPAIR
150636 ARMA INTERNATIONAL $450.00 MEMBERSHIP
150637 AT&T-CELLULAR CR BR $22.95 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
150638 A T&T-MEGACOM SERVICE $9.21 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
150639 ACORN CONSULTING $715.00 CONSULTING SERVICES
15DS40 AIR LIQUIDE AMERICA CORP. $1,604.72 SPECIALTY GASSES
150641 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $18,705.89 O&M AGREEMENT OXYGEN.SYST.M.O.8-9419
150642 ALADDIN HOUSE $229.73 WINDOW BLINDS
150543 AMERIDATA $748.05 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
150644 AMERICAN AIRLINES $387.10 TRAVEL SERVICES
150645 AMERICAN MANAGEMENT ASSOC. $1,500.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING
150616 BLAKE P.ANDERSON $748.93 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
150647 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $1.094.40 NOTICES&ADS
150648 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $319.99 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
150649 AQUATIC BIOASSAY&CONSULTANT $2,305.00 LAB TESTING
150650 ARAMARK SERVICES,INC. $72.73 SAFETY SUPPLIES
150651 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT $1.476.49 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
150652 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. $60.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL
m 150653 ATKINIJONES COMPUTER SERVICE $321.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT
X 150664 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $3.667.23 PAYROLL SERVICES
x
� 150655 BKK LANDFILL $2,708.99 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10.9-91
150656 E S BABCOCK&SONS INC $277.50 LAB ANALYSIS
-1 150657 BANCROFT-WHITNEY CO.. $104.52 PUBLICATION
y 150655 BANK OF AMERICA $309.52 ACCOUNT ANALYSIS
150659 BARNSTEAD I THERMOLYNE CORP. $952.20 LAB SUPPLIES
150660 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $174.56 BATTERIES
150661 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $4,921.90 LAB SUPPLIES
150662 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $259.90 TRUCK WASH TICKETS
150663 BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS 5743.19 LAB EQUIPMENT
150664 BIO-GRO DIVISION $49.989.21 RESIDUALS REMOVAL NO 4-26.95
150665 BONA-RUES $685.86 TRUCK PARTS
150666 BUDGET JANITORIAL $3,330.00 JANITORIAL SERVICES MO 1-12-94
150667 BNI BOOKS $34.27 PUBLICATION
150668 BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFFAIRS $781.89 PUBLICATIONS
150669 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. $608.58 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
160670 CH2M HILL $78,003.38 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-31
150671 C.P.J. $1.616.25 LAB SUPPLIES
150672 CS COMPANY $4,144.60 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
150673 CWEA 1995 SRTC $1,056.00 REGISTRATION FEES
150674 CALTROL,INC. $1.609.35 HARDWARE
150675 CALIFORNIA AUTO COLLISION,INC. $1,251.71 TRUCK BODY REPAIR
160676 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $200.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
150677 CALIFORNIA JOURNAL,INC. $29.95 SUBSCRIPTION
150678 CANUS CORPORATION $17.200.13 FIBER OPTIC CABLE
150679 CAREER TRACK SEMINARS $158.00 REGISTRATION FEES
150680 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $49,637.36 ENGINEERING SERVICE J-33-2
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 031191% PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 0320/96 POSTING DATE 0320/e6
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
150681 BRYAN CAVE LLP $97.75 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
150682 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $2,019.91 OFFICE FURNITURE
150683 CENTURY SAFETY INST.B SUPPLY $175.00 SAFETY SUPPLIES
150884 CHEMWEST,INC. $1,223.23 PUMP PARTS
150685 - KELLY CHRISTENSEN $215.46 INCIDENT COMMAND POST TARP
150686 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $4,545.60 SERVICE AGREEMENT
150687 COAST RUBBER STAMP $72.34 OFFICE SUPPLIES
150688 COMMUNICATIONS PERFORMANCE GROUP $17.850.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE M010.25.95
160689 CONFIDENTIAL RECORDS $50.00 DOCUMENT HANDLING
150690 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $4.048.02 ELECTRIC PARTS
150691 CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS $7.951.69 FREIGHT
150692 CONSOLIDATED REPOGRAPHICS $1,980.59 PRINTING SERVICES
150693 CONSUMER PIPE $1,054.01 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
15D694 CONTINENTAL EQUIPMENT B SUPPLY $1.454.32 TOOLS
150695 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $7,151.98 ENGINE PARTS
150696 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $228.10 TRUCK PARTS
150697 COUNTERPART ENTERPRISES $977.07 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
m 150598 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $914.45 ELECTRIC PARTS
>C 150699 CRANE PRO SERVICES $10,035.57 CRANE MAINTENANCE
ti 150700 CAVE'S BICYCLES,INC. $142.64 BIKE REPAIRS
to 150701 JIM DAVIDSON $175.00 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
150702 DELL COMPUTER CORP. $27.424.88 COMPUTERS B MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
150703 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIF. $36,743.26 DENTAL INSURANCE PLAN M.0.1-12-94
3? 150704 THE DIAMOND GROUP $4,00D.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
N 150705 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $4.872.51 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
150706 DISCO PRINT COMPANY $443.11 OFFICE SUPPLIES
150707 ROBERT F.DRIVER ASSOC. $83.877.00 PERSONNEL INSURANCE CONSULTANT
150708 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $563.32 PAINT SUPPLIES
150709 ESP NORTH $210.09 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
150710 EAGLE ENTERPRISES $4,040.63 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
150711 ECOSYSTEMS EN-G 8 ANALYSES $11.739.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
150712 EDWARDS HIGH VACUUM INTER. $19.68 LAB SUPPLIES
150713 EMERGENCY MGMT NETWORK $3,840.00 CPRIFIRST AID TRAINING
150714 ENCHANTER,INC. $2.800.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5-24416
150715 ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND $20.00 PUBLICATIONS
150716 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $1,011.70 LAB SERVICES
150717 ENVIRO PODUCTS $210.75 MISC.HARDWARE
150718 FLUID TECH.SALES $1,056.41 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
150719 FMC CORPORATION $93,365.28 HYDROGEN PEROXIDE M09.14-94
150720 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $6.732.50 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.D.10.9-91
150721 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $254.45 AIR FREIGHT
150722 FILTERLINE CORP $497.49 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
160723 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $14,382.81 FILTERS
150724 FIRSTCHOICE $1.605.35 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT
150725 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $1,329.67 LAB SUPPLIES
150726 CLIFFORD A FORKERT $4,579.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 03/19/96 PAGE 3
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 03/20/96 POSTING DATE 03/20/96
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
150727 FOSS MARITIME,CO. $1,710.05 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
150728 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $86.30 PHOTO SUPPLIES
150729 - FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $206.88 PAINT SUPPLIES
150730 FRANKLIN ELECTRONIC PUBLISHERS $46.53 PUBLICATION
150731 GST,INC. $11,964.62 OFFICE SUPPLIES
150732 GENERAL BINDING CORP. $241.92 OFFICE MACHINE REPAIRS
150733 GE IND&POWER SYSTEMS $2.432.68 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
150734 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $36.40 ELECTRIC PARTS
150735 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $7.031.25 TELEPHONE SERVICES
160736 GIERUCH-MITCHELL,INC. $9,651.13 PUMP PARTS
160737 GOVT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOC. $406.00 PUBLICATIONS
150738 WW GRAINGER,INC. $1,926.D4 COMPRESSOR PARTS
150739 GRASBY S.T.I. $12.077.11 ENGINE PARTS
150740 THOMAS GRAY&ASSOC.,INC. $567.00 LAB TESTING
150741 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC WHOLESALE $288.87 PHONE PARTS
150742 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $89.60 PRINTING
150743 DOA CONSULTANTS $7.672.79 SURVEYING SERVICES MO 8.23-95
X 160744 DAVID R.GRIFFIN $14.116.22 LEGAL SERVICES-TECHITE PIPE M.0.9.14.94
= 150745 DAVID M.GRIFFITH&ASSOC. $11,885.70 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
150746 HR DIRECT $4.95 OFFICE SUPPLIES
w 150747 HB TYPE&GRAPHICS $10.78 PRINTING
-1 150748 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $4.359.61 TRUCK PARTS
150749 HACH COMPANY $42.92 LAB SUPPLIES
I 15D750 KEVIN HADDEN $127.73 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
V4 150751 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $888.79 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
150762 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS $2,190.00 CONTAINER RENTALS
150753 PL HAWN CO,INC.. $99.22 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
150754 HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT $2,083.33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN.
150755 HEWLETT PACKARD $269.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
150756 HOME DEPOT $490.13 SMALL HARDWARE
150757 PIS HUGHES CO,INC. $1.643.16 PAINT SUPPLIES
150758 SHAMSHAD HYDER $1,053.3D EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
150759 IEQ INDUSTRIES $940.00 MACHINE SUPPLIES
150760 IPCO SAFETY $3.742.70 SAFETY SUPPLIES
150761 INFORMATION RESOURCES $875.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
150762 INSTRUMENT LABORATORY $109.29 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
150783 INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH&TECHNICAL ASSITANCE $81600.00 GRANT
160764 INTERMEC S636.11 LAB SUPPLIES
150765 JENDHAM,INC. $660.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
150766 KALLEEN'S COMPUTER PRODUCTS $169.70 COMPUTER SUPPLIES
150767 KEMIRON PACIFIC,INC. $54,140.95 FERRIC CHLORIDE MO 9.27-95
150768 KING BEARING,INC. $103.31 MACHINE SUPPLIES
150769 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $431,48 TOOLS
150770 PENNY KYLE $94.00 PER DIEM
150771 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY CO. $125.90 SAFETY SUPPLIES
150772 LEE&RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC. $24.823.80 ENGINEERING SERVICES
FUND NO 9199 • JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 03119IDS PAGE 4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 03120/96 POSTING DATE 03/20/96
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
160773 LUSTRE-CAL $11.24 SAFETY
150774 M.S.BELLOWS $53.64 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
150775 MPS $249.97 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
150776 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $738,280.00 CONSTRUCTION P1-3&2
150777 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $24,839.00 CONSTRUCTION P242-2
150178 MIKE MCCARTHY BUICK,INC. $89.322.14 TRUCKS
150779 DONALD F.MCINTYRE $501.23 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
150780 MEASUREMENT VARIABLES,INC. $219.85 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
150781 MECHANICAL DRIVES CO. $373.09 INSTURMENT SUPPLIES
150782 MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. $223.76 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
150783 MICRO CENTER $590.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
150784 MIDWAY MFG.B MACHINING $7.703.23 MECHANICAL REPAIRS
150785 MINNESOTA WESTERN VISUAL PRES. $297.78 LAB SUPPLIES
150786 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3.111.08 UNIFORM RENTALS
150787 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO. $742.00 INSTRUMENT
150788 MONITOR LABS $1,308.48 INSTRUMENT
150789 MICHAEL D.MOORE $389.89 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
m 150790 MORGAN COMPANY $3,358.86 CRANE PARTS
X 150791 MOTION INDUSTRIES,INC. $2.355.88 PUMP PARTS
= 150792 NATIONAL TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER $5.478.87 TECHNICAL TRAINING
b0 150793 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $180.58 PLUMBING SUPPLIES -
150794 NETWORK GENERAL CORP. $6.399.29 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
150795 NORTHERN TELECOM $1,760.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
D 150795 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $5,008.92 OFFICE SUPPLIES
150797 ORANGE COAST PETROLEUM EQUIP. $232.74 TRUCK PARTS
150798 OXYGEN SERVICE $1,733.57 SPECIALTY GASES
150799 COUNTY O ORANGE $180.00 USER FEE ADJUSTMENT CHARGES
150800 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $19.164.27 WORKERS COMPENSATION REIMBURSEMENT
150801 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT $41.304.90 GAP WATER USE M.O.6-9-93
150802 PSSI $1.418.15 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION
150803 PACIFIC PARTS $17.516.50 INSTRUMENT PARTS
150804 PADGETT - THOMPSON $145.00 REGISTRATION
150805 PERMA SEAL $182.83 LURE OIL
150806 PERVO PAINT $783.77 PAINT
150807 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $785.62 REINS.PETTY CASH,TRAINING B TRAVEL
150808 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $138,936.38 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3-2995
150809 PLANNING SOLUTIONS $6,000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
150810 POLYPURE,INC. $12.752.28 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3,11-92
150811 PORT SUPPLY $192.12 BASIN SUPPLIES
150812 POSITIVE FORMULATORS,INC. $197.46 CHEMICALS
150813 POSTAGE BY PHONE $5.000.00 POSTAGE
150814 POSTMASTER $450.00 ANNUAL PO BOX FEE
150815 PROMINENT FLUID CONTROL,INC. $79940 EQUIPMENT RENTAL
160816 PUTZMEISTER,INC. $399.34 PUMP PARTS
150817 QUICKSTART TECHNOLOGIES $5,626.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
150818 RB R INSTRUMENTS $572.65 ELECTRIC PARTS
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 03/19/96 PAGE 5
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 03/20196 POSTING DATE 03120M
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
150619 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $2.062.75 TRASH REMOVAL
150820 RAIN FOR RENT $1.989.34 SEWER BY-PASS PIPING
150821 - BOLT DELIVERY $48.00 FREIGHT
150822 RM MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL $367.11 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
150823 GEORGE ROBERTSON $693.25 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
150824 RYAN-HERCO $6.16 METAL
150825 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $1.407.08 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
150826 SARTORIUS CORP. $6.50 LAB SUPPLIES
150827 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTL $38,628.15 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.64k94
150828 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $265.98 SPECIALTY GASES
150829 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $1.845.29 TOOLS
150830 SHASTA ELECTRIC $63.806.00 CONSTRUCTION J31-2
150831 SHURELUCK SALES $1,076.31 TOOLSIHARDWARE
150832 SIEVERS INSTRUMENTS,INC. $395.19 LAB SUPPLIES
150833 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO. $81.36 LAB SUPPLIES
15GS34 SKILL PATH SEMINARS $99.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
150835 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $860.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS
m 150836 M.LEE SMITH PUBLISHERS ASSN. $417.00 PUBLICATION
>( 150837 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP. $178.82 TOOLS
= 150838 SOUTH BAY FOUNDRY,INC. $6,465.00 MANHOLE FRAMES&COVERS
pD 150839 SO COASTARMY&NAVY SURPLUS $85.99 DUFFLE BAGS
160840 SOUTH COASTWATER $125.00 LAB SUPPLIES
15GS41 SO CALIF EDISON CO $37,133.20 POWER
D 150842 SO CALIF MARINE INSTITUTE $600.00 OCEAN MONITORIING
150843 SO.CALIF.WATER CO. $285.42 WATER USE
150844 SPARLINO INSTRUMENT CO.,INC. 5182.90 METER
150845 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $2,063.16 MECHANICAL PARTS
150846 TONER SYSTEM INTERNATIONAL $1,412.52 PRINTER SUPPLIES
150847 TONY'S LOCK&SAFE SERVICE $662A7 LOCKS&KEYS
150848 ED TORRES $88.90 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
150849 TRADE SERVICE CORP $1,081.91 PUBLICATIONS
150850 TREBOR ELECTRONICS $682.77 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
150851 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $207.36 TRUCK PARTS
150852 TRUESUAIL LABS $1,494.20 LAB SERVICES
150853 JO TUCKER&SON,INC. $1,303.79 INSTRUMENT PARTS
160854 U.S.AUTO GLASS CENTERS $100.81 TRUCK PARTS
150855 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $221.00 LAB SUPPLIES
150856 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $431.65 PARCEL SERVICES
160857 DATAVAULT/US SAFE DEPOSIT CO. $146.82 BACK-UP DISK STORAGE
160858 VWR SCIENTIFIC $3.011.34 LAB SUPPLIES
150859 VALIN CORPORATION $31.65 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
150860 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $336.88 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
150861 VALTEKC/O R.M.CONTROL $529.78 INSTRUMENT PARTS
150862 VARION ASSOCIATES,INC. $182.09 LAB SUPPLIES
150863 VERTEX TECHNOLOGIES,INC. $123.62 FIBER OPTICS
150864 WACKENHUT CORP. $15.614.81 CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 03119M PAGE6
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 03/20/96 POSTING DATE 0320I98
WARRANTNO. VENDOR AMOUNT
150865 CARLWARREN B CO. $559.64 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR
150866 BANANA BLUEPRINT $460.87 PRINTING M.O.11-07-94
150867 WATERS CORPORATION $3,856.26 SERVICE AGREEMENT
150668 GARY WELMAN $1,298.32 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
150869 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $108.39 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
150870 WESCO $5,690.04 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
150871 NANCY WNEATLEY 61,268.14 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
150872 RICKARD YOUNG PRODUCTS $782.07 INSTRUMENT PARTS
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 03/20/96 $2,167,328.39
SUMMARY AMOUNT
92 OPER FUND $230.46
93 OPER FUND $8,078.71
93 CAP FAC FUND $16,133.48
m 87 OPER FUND $7.997.97
X 911 OPER FUND $8,902.55
2 011 CAP FAC FUND 613.31
to JT OPER FUND $761.338.90
CORF $1,143.601.05
SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $58.550.50
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $162.481.48
i
m
52,167,328.39
1
FUND NO 9199 - Jf DIRT WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 03/19/98 PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 04/03/96 POSTING DATE 04/03/96
WARRANT NO, VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
150895 ASL CONSULTING ENGINEERS $200.00 ATWOOD SUBTRUNK PLAN PREPERATION
150896 ATBT-MEGACOM SERVICE $967.8D LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
150897 ATBT-MEGACOM SERVICE $5.04 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
150898 ATBT-CELLULAR OR SR $1.05 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
150899 ATMS $1.794.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
150900 ACOUSTIC STANDARDS,INC. $859.98 SAFETY SUPPLIES
150901 AIR PRODUCTS B CHEMICALS $18.322.00 O&M AGREEMENT OXYGEN.SYST.M.0.8-9A9
150902 AMERIDATA $3.72 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
150903 AMERICAN AIR FILTER,INC. $61.67 MECHANICAL PARTS
150904 AMERICAN AIRLINES $5,410.55 TRAVEL SERVICES
150905 AMERICAN SIGMA $3.741.41 SAMPLER
150906 AMERICAN VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS $2,759.40 SERVICE AGREEMENT
160907 SLAKE P.ANDERSON $354.96 REIMBURSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE
150908 ANIXTER-DISTRIBUTION $106.75 COMPUTER SUPPLIES
150909 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT $1,289.81 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
150810 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. $80.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL
160911 AMSA $425.00 WINTER TECHNICAL CONFERENCE
150912 RANDOLPH AUSTIN CO. $677.69 LAB SUPPLIES
XfTl 160913 AWARDS B TROPHIES $63.20 PLAQUES
= 150914 BC WIRE ROPE B RIGGING $355.08 AUTO PARTS
�--' 150915 BFI MEDICAL WASTE SYSTEMS $45.40 WASTE DISPOSAL
150916 BKK LANDFILL $2.982.12 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91
-I 150917 E S BABCOCK B SONS INC $540.00 LAB ANALYSIS
Lp 150918 BANANA BLUEPRINT $24,653.28 PRINTING M.0.11-07-94
I 150919 BANK OF AMERICA $158.81 BANKING SERVICES
150920 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $465.05 BATTERIES
ISG921 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $4.858.45 LAB SUPPLIES
150922 BERENSON COMMUNICATIONS $401.07 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
150923 BIO-GRO DIVISION $40.482.57 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M0426-95
150924 BISHOP COMPANY $5.663.89 TOOLS
160925 BLACK BOX CORP - $108.34 FIBER OPTIC TRANSCEIVER REPAIR
150926 BLOOMBERG L.P. $4,832.59 FINANCIAL MONITORING M.0.4-14-93
150927 BLUE CHIP COMPUTER SYSTEMS $2,600.23 COMPUTER B SOFTWARE
150928 BOOT BARN $247.51 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES
150929 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $6.728.17 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
160930 BUSH B ASSOCIATES,INC. $1.552.00 SURVEYING SERVICES MO 641-94
150931 BYRUM,HOLLAND B GRIFFIN $4,800.07 LEGAL SERVICES-TECHITE MO 1-11-95
150932 CCI TECHNOLOGIES $1,043.00 SPICE CABLES
150933 CALTROL,INC. $1.471.57 HARDWARE
150934 CALIFORNIA LABORATORIES&DEV $4.195.00 REMOVE FUME HOODS FROM OLD LAB J-11-1
150935 CALLAN ASSOCIATES,INC. $4.976.78 INVESTMENT ADVISOR SERVICES
150936 CAPITAL WESTWARD $278.28 MECHANICAL PARTS
150937 JOHN CARDLLO ENGINEERS $54,656.93 ENGINEERING SERVICE J-33.2
150938 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $2.470.03 OFFICE FURNITURE
150939 CENTURY MICRO PRODUCTS $5,666.99 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT
150940 CERFNET $90.80 COMPUTER SERVICES
FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE DM9196 PAGE2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID O4103/96 POSTING DATE 04/03/96
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
150941 CHASE,ROTCHFORD,DRUKKER $7,200.65 LEGAL SERVICES MO 12-14-94
150942 CHEMWEST,INC. $18.720.75 PUMP PARTS
150943 CHROME CRANKSHAFT,INC. $1,300.00 PUMP PARTS
150944 CLEMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL $8,702.70 CONSULTANT-LANDFILL PROJECT M07-31-95
150945 COLE-PARMER INSTRUMENT CO. $170.56 LAS SUPPLIES
160946 COMMUNICATIONS PERFORMANCE GROUP $17,860.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MO 10-25-95
150947 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $12,664.08 PUMP PARTS
150948 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $5,482.15 ELECTRIC PARTS
150949 CONSOLIDATED REPOGRAPHICS $904.06 PRINTING SERVICES
150950 CONSUMER PIPE $585.57 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
150951 CONTINENTAL EQUIPMENT&SUPPLY $768.50 TOOLS
150952 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS O C $2.000.50 CONSULTING SERVICES M.0.8.11-93
IW953 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $249.50 ENGINE PARTS
150954 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $264.30 TRUCK PARTS
150956 COUNTERPART ENTERPRISES $45.53 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
150956 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $934.08 ELECTRIC PARTS
150957 DATA SYSTEMS SERVICE $2,231.42 SOFTWARE
TIT 150958 ALBERT W.DAVIES,INC. $565.819.80 CONSTRUCTION 3-36R
X 150959 DELL MARKETING L.P. $39,031.36 COMPUTERS
= 150960 DELTA PACKAGING PRODUCTS,INC. $146.00 LAB SUPPLIES
ey 150961 DIETERICH-POST CO. $557.37 INSTRUMENTPARTS
150962 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $6.553.59 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
150963 MICHAEL F.DILLON $4,867.72 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CO 150964 ROBERT F.DRIVER ASSOC. $22.075.00 PERSONNEL INSURANCE CONSULTANT
150965 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $192.42 PAINT SUPPLIES
N 150966 ESP NORTH $1.103.16 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
150967 EAGLE DISTRIBUTION $285A3 AUTO PARTS
150968 ELECTRO TEST,INC. $3,000.00 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
150969 ELECTRA-BOND,INC. $4.821.81 PUMP PARTS
150970 EMERGENCY MGMT NETWORK $3.690.00 CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING
150971 ENCHANTER,INC. $3.500.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5.24-95
150972 EXCIDE ELECTRONICS $3.985.99 CONTROL CENTER U.P.S.REPAIR
150973 EXPO C/O $16,017.04 FIBER OPTIC TEST KIT
150974 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $4,911.25 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.1D9-91
150975 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $154.75 AIR FREIGHT
150976 FIBERTRON $2,586.00 FIBER OPTIC CABLE
150977 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE $720.00 PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORT
150978 FIRST CHOICE $3,310.92 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT
150979 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $533.38 LAB SUPPLIES
150980 FISONS INSTRUMENTS $360.64 SERVICE AGREEMENT
150981 FLAT S VERTICAL,INC. $215.00 CONCRETE CUTTING
150982 FLICKINGER CO. $144.91 VALVE
150983 FLO-SYSTEMS $15,869.34 PUMP PARTS
150984 FORD SAWAJOT MGMT GROUP $5,718.16 CONSOLIDATION SERVICES
150985 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $155.32 PHOTO SUPPLIES
150986 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $105.00 WATER USE
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 03/29/96 PAGE 3
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 04103M POSTING DATE 04M3196
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
150987 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $1.059.55 PAINT SUPPLIES
150988 THE FOXBORO CO. $71.20 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
150989 FRANKLIN QUEST CO. $360.24 OFFICE SUPPLIES
150990 FRY'S ELECTRONICS $742.34 ELECTRONIC B COMPUTER SUPPLIES
150991 GST,INC. $5.543.15 OFFICE SUPPLIES
150992 GTE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM $93.070.75 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
150993 GARAHL LUMBER CO. $255.72 LUMBERIHARDWARE
150994 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $2,679.74 CHEMICALS
150995 GAUGE REPAIR SERVICE $203.22 GAUGE REPAIR
150996 GENERAL BINDING CORP. $550A2 OFFICE MACHINE REPAIRS
150997 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY OO. $1.222.34 ELECTRIC PARTS
150998 GENERAL PETROLEUM $9.55003 GASOLINE
150999 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $207.30 TELEPHONE SERVICES
151000 GENERAL TELEPHONE $808,56 RELOCATE 2 TELEPHONE DUCTS 3.36R
151001 LIFE TECHNOLOGIES I GIBCO I SRL $128.50 LAB SUPPLIES
151002 GIERLICH-MITCHELL,INC. $20.39329 PUMP PARTS
151003 GOLDEN STATE MACHINERY,INC. $42.98 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
151004 WW GRAINGER.INC. $43.36 COMPRESSOR PARTS
m 151005 GRAPHIC CONTROLS $16594 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
= 151008 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $818.99 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
t- 151007 GRASSY S.T.I. $655,72 ENGINE PARTS
151005 DGA CONSULTANTS $2,100.00 SURVEYING SERVICES 3-36R
151009 GRIFFIN CARRICK $15,200.75 LEGAL SERVICES-TECHITE
C, 151010 HR PRESS $187.50 SOFTWARE
1 151011 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $96.32 TRUCK PARTS
W 151012 HACH COMPANY $564.52 LAB SUPPLIES
151013 PL HAWN CO,INC. $2,494.58 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
151014 INGRID HELLEBRAND $100.26 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
151016 HILTI,INC. $BOS.B1 TOOLS
151016 HOME DEPOT $152.76 SMALL HARDWARE
151017 HYCLONE LABORATORIES,INC. $511.71 LAB SUPPLIES
151018 IDEKX $1.616.25 LAB SUPPLIES
151019 IPCO SAFETY $6,712.69 SAFETY SUPPLIES
151020 INDUSTRIAL STEAM $1,902.87 PUMP
151021 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $558.42 CONNECTORS
151022 INTEGRATED BUSINESS INTERIORS $60.00 CHAIR REPAIR
151023 THE IRVINE CO. $109.688.55 BAYSIDE SEWER RELOCATION MO 10.10.73
151024 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $69.16 WATER USE
151026 JAMISON ENGINEERING $18.587.50 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
151026 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $1,031.38 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
151027 DEE JASPAR B ASSOC. $1,31C84 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
151028 JAYS CATERING $1,042.02 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE
151029 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $334.64 ELECTRIC PARTS
151030 JONES CHEMICALS,INC. $10,837.87 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE MO 4-26-95
151031 KALLEEN'S COMPUTER PRODUCTS $414.10 COMPUTER SUPPLIES
151032 KEMIRON PACIFIC,INC. $27.560.46 FERRIC CHLORIDE MO 9.27-95
FUND NO 9199 - JF DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 03/29/96 PAGE 4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 04/03018 POSTING DATE 04/03/96
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
161033 KENNEDY HYDRAULICS $1.118.74 MOTOR REPAIRS
151034 KERRY CONSULTING GROUP $6.179.06 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MO 11-15-95
151035 - KIMBLE/KONTES GLASSWARE $97.63 LAB SUPPLIES
151036 KING BEARING,INC. $809.02 MACHINE SUPPLIES
151037 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $3,055.03 TOOLS
151038 LEAK ALERT SERVICE CO. $059.99 FUEL TANK MONITOR REPAIR
151039 LATRONICS $430.94 TRAINING EQUIPMENT
151040 LEADERSHIP DIRECTORIES,INC. $358.76 SUBSCRIPTIONS
151041 LEE&RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC. $1,840.95 ENGINEERING SERVICES
151042 MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY CORP. $617.47 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
151043 MANDIC MOTORS $119.00 TOWING SERVICES
161044 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $57.98 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
151045 MCGARRY CENTRAL BUSINESS PROD $524.20 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
151046 DONALD F.MCINTYRE $100.08 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
151047 MCWELCO RACK-N-BOX CO. $1,287.83 TOOLBOXES
151040 MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. $433.25 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
161049 MICRO MOTION $1.125.79 CONTROLLER REPAIR
m 151050 MICROFLEX MEDICAL CORP. $1,136.00 SAFETY SUPPLIES
X 151051 MIDWAY MFG.&MACHINING $19,067.64 MECHANICAL REPAIRS
= 151052 MILLTRONICS $3,050.40 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
I
Ly 151053 MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES CO. $1,147.77 SAFETY SUPPLIES
151064 MINNESOTA WESTERN VISUAL PRES. $355.06 LAB SUPPLIES
151055 MISSION INDUSTRIES $2.380.12 UNIFORM RENTALS
CO 151056 MONITOR LABS $1.698.80 INSTRUMENT
J
151057 MOTION INDUSTRIES,INC. $523.61 PUMP PARTS
151058 NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS $35.25 PUBLICATION
151059 NATIONAL TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER $1.785.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
151060 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $797.56 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
151061 NEUTRON $27,840.89 ANIONIC POLYMER M.O.8.10-94
151062 NEW HORIZONS COMPUTER CENTERS,INC. $2.940.00 SOFTWARE TRAINING CLASSES
151063 NEWARK ELECTRONICS $789.40 INSTRUMENT PARTS
151064 NICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY $1,103.63 LUBRICANTSIDIESEL FUEL
151065 NORTEL PRODUCT TRAINING $130.00 PUBLICATIONS
151066 NORTH BAY WORK CARE $338.60 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS
151067 NORTHERN TELECOM $1,500.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
151068 NORTHERN TELECOM $2,245.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
151069 ROSERTJ.00TEN $364.05 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
151070 ORACLE CORPORATION $3,000.00 SOFTWARE
151071 ORANGE COAST PIPE SUPPLY $123.57 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
151072 ORANGE COURIER $181.20 COURIER SERVICES
151073 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. $803.28 FITTINGS
151074 OXYGEN SERVICE $907.76 SPECIALTY GASES
151076 MUNICIPAL COURT OF CALIF. $90.00 USE FEE ADJUSTMENT CHARGES
151076 PSSI $2,107.80 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION
151077 PACIFIC CLIPPINGS $163.40 CONTRACT SERVICE
151078 PACIFIC PARTS $10.045.71 INSTRUMENT PARTS
FUND NO 9199 - Jr DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 03129/96 PAGE 5
REPORT NLJMBERAP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 04/03/96 POSTING DATE 04/03/96
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
151079 PACIFIC BELL $1.299.76 TELEPHONE SERVICES
151080 PADRE JANITORIAL SUPPLY $2,013.58 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
151081 PAGENET $1,154.44 RENTAL EQU'PMENT
151082 PALERMO&ASSOCIATES $7,600.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
151083 PALMIERI,TYLER,WIENER, $961.00 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.6-12-91
151084 PARAGON CABLE $36.78 CABLE SERVICES
151085 PARKHOUSE TIRE,INC. $963.29 TIRES
151086 PARTS UNLIMITED $206.57 TRUCK PARTS
151087 RONAN ENGINEERING $142.60 INSTRUMENT PARTS
161088 PEABODY $1,774.73 PUMP PARTS
151089 PEDERSON COMMUNICATIONS $19,103.20 VOICE&DATA REWIRE-ADMIN.BLDG.
151090 PENI4ALL COMPANY $650.00 CONCRETE REMOVAL
151091 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $1,173.92 REIMB.PETTY CASH,TRAINING TRAVEL
151092 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $131,963.91 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3-29.95
151093 PLANNING SOLUTIONS $5,250.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
151094 POLYMETRICS,INC. $1,262.75 LAB SUPPLIES
151095 POLYPURE,INC. $19.922.76 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92
m 151096 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $112.00 ICE FOR SAMPLES
x 151097 PRIZO&PRIZO $5,764.49 DIST.3 CONNECTION FEE FEFUND
= 151098 PUMPING SOLUTIONS,INC. E712.77 PUMP PARTS
to 151099 OUESTRON CORP. $1.760.00 LAB SUPPLIES
151100 OUICKSTART TECHNOLOGIES $1,876.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
151101 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $1.228.01 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS
OC 151102 RED WING SHOES $241.36 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES
151103 BOLT DELIVERY $59.00 FREIGHT
161104 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DIST. $990.59 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
151105 RE-NU OFFICE SYSTEMS $420.00 RECONFIGURE OFFICE SPACE
151108 RM MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL $373.80 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
151107 ROBINSON FERTILIZER CO..INC. $1.422.30 GRASS&WEED KILLER
151108 JOSEPH T.RYERSON&SON,INC. $2,272.95 STAINLESS STEEL PLATES
151109 SKC WEST - $116.94 SAFETY SUPPLIES
151110 SARBS-PDC $60.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION
161111 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $603.99 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
151112 R.CRAIG SCOTT&ASSOC. $31.793.20 LEGAL SERVICES-PERSONNEL ISSUES
151113 SEA COAST DESIGNS $1,587.16 LAB SUPPLIES
151114 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $6,846.10 TOOLS
151115 SHORE PERSONNEL SERVICES $11.500.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
151116 SHURELUCK SALES $12.961.62 TOOLSOIARDWARE
161117 SKALAR,INC. $573.30 LAB SUPPLIES
161118 SKYPARK WALKJN MEDICAL CLINIC $97.34 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS
151119 SMITH PIPE&SUPPLY $400.13 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
151120 SOUTH COAST WATER $35.00 LAB SUPPLIES
151121 SO CALIF COASTAL WATER $299,740.00 SO.M.COASTAL WATER RESEARCH PROJECT
151122 SO CALIF EDISON CO $66.489.88 POWER
151123 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $24.939.02 NATURAL GAS
151124 SO.CALIFORNIA MARINE INST. $800.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 0329/95 PAGES
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 04/03/96 POSTING DATE 04/03/96
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
151125 SOUTHERN CALIF TRANE SERVICE $70.95 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
151126 SQUARE D POWER MGMT $1,250.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
161127 SUPERB ONE-HOUR PHOTO $25.64 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
161120 SYSCOM,INC. $6.900.00 MULTI-USER LICENSE
151129 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $63.94 MECHANICAL PARTS
151130 TIME MOTION TOOLS $863.16 INSTRUMENT PARTS
151131 TONY'S LOCK B SAFE SERVICE $12.39 LOCKS&KEYS
151132 ED TORRES $139.20 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
151133 TRANSMATION,INC. $94.81 INSTRUMENT PARTS
151134 TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY,INC. $3,973.84 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.O.5.11-94
151135 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $682.38 TRUCK PARTS
161136 JG TUCKER&SON,INC. $9,406.94 INSTRUMENT PARTS
151137 TWINING LABORATORIES $1.284.18 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-13-94
151138 USA BLUE BOOK $556.64 MISC.HARDWARE
151139 UNISOURCEB/OR BUTLER PAPER $643.43 OFFICE SUPPLIES
151140 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $146.89 PARCEL SERVICES
151141 VWR SCIENTIFIC $4,473.39 LAB SUPPLIES
m 151142 VALIN CORPORATION $111.60 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
X 151143 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $456.05 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
= 151144 VALVATE ASSOCIATES $225.64 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
D 161145 VAN NOSTRAND REINHOLD $1.040.00 BOOK
�-+ 151146 VARIAN ASSOCIATES,INC. $1,296.40 LAB SUPPLIES
151147 VERTEX TECHNOLOGIES,INC. $3,193.62 FIBER OPTICS
00 151148 VILLAGE NURSERIES $243.74 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES
151149 WACKENHUT CORP. $6,779.38 CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS
151150 WAL-CON CONSTRUCTION CO. $204.075.37 CONSTRUCTION 5-37-3
151151 WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION $449.50 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT COURSES
151152 WAXIE $372.33 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
151153 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $5,709.63 CAUSTIC SODA MO 8-23-95
151154 WESTERN SWITCHES $121.99 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
151155 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $476.14 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
151158 WESCO $2,370.50 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
161157 WHATMAN $825.33 LAB SUPPLIES
151158 WILLARD MARKING DEVICES $48.49 OFFICE SUPPLIES
151159 ROURKE,WOODRUFF&SPRADLIN $75.975.13 LEGAL SERVICES MO7-26.95
151160 XEROX CORP. $16.721.01 COPIER LEASES
i511B1 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $866.00 LAB SUPPLIES
151162 JOHNSON YOKOGAWA CORP. $1.640.31 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 04/03/96 $2.480,313.44
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 03a9196 PAGE 7
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 04/03/96 POSTING DATE 04/D3/96
SUMMARY AMOUNT
02 OPER FUND $3.171.80
02 CAP FAC FUND $213.79
#3 OPER FUND $16,045.90
#3 CAP FAC FUND $597.473.69
#5 OPER FUND $5.994.45
#5 CAP FAC FUND $109.688.65
#7 OPER FUND $6,385.10
#7 CAP FAC FUND $1.410.09
#11 OPER FUND $994.94
#11 CAP FAC FUND $16,505.00
#14 OPER FUND $365.21
#14 CAP PAC FUND $1.349.55
#5&6 OPER FUND $3,315.25
#5&6 CAP FAC FUND $206.537.23
#6&7OPER FUND $6,822.36
#7&14 OPER FUND $5,856.10
JT OPER FUND $583.982.67
X CORF $355,959.46
= SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $51,041.23
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $507,201.07
b]
—1 $2.480.313.44
D0
V
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE-VARIOUS PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID-MISCELLANEOUS HANDWRITE WARRANTS
WARRANT DATE WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
0327196 160892 PAULINE JOHNSTON AND $6.015.00 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM
0328/96 150893 THE BALBOA BAY CLUB $4,394.70 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM
0328196 150594 JOHN KELSO $68.50 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM
04/04/96 151163 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $3,486.79 LAB SUPPLIES
04/04/96 151164 COUNTY CLERK $25.00 PERMIT
04/04/96 151165 COUNTY OF ORANGE $90.60 USE FEE ADJUSTMENT CHARGES
04/04/96 151166 ED TORRES $250.00 PER DIEM
04/05196 151167 THE BALBOA BAY CLUB $3,227,30 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM
W105MB 151168 DEE TURNER $7,776.31 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM
04109M 151169 ATMS $897.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID $21.130.60
SUMMARY AMOUNT
X67 OPER FUND $90.00
= JT OPER FUND $2.671.47
CORF $1,396.66
SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $22,381.81
.� JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $590.66
j� $27,130.60
r
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
MAY 22, 1996
Each District
Agenda Item (4): Annual Election of Chair and Chair Pro Tem of
each District's Board.
Summary
In accordance with the Districts' policies, a Chair and Chair pro tern for each District Board is
elected annually at the May meeting. The Boards' rules of procedures are as follows:
Chair of the District -A Chair(and Chair pro tem) shall be elected by majority vote as the
first order of business by the members of each District's Board of Directors at the first
meeting in May of each year, and said Chair(and Chair pro tem) shall serve at the
pleasure of the majority of said members.
For the information of the new Directors, each Chair automatically becomes a member of the
Executive Committee, which meets on an as needed basis at the call of the Joint Chair. This
Committee also includes the Joint Chair, Vice Joint Chair, the representatives of the County
Board of Supervisors and each past Joint Chair who is currently active. The Executive
Committee's function is to study and make recommendations to the Joint Boards concerning
major issues and policy matters. For example, the Executive Committee is currently dealing
with Consolidation issues. Those members of the Executive Committee are also able to
participate in CASA(California Association of Sanitation Agencies) Workshops held throughout
the year.
The current Chair and Chair pro tem are as follows:
District No. Chair Chair Pro tern
1 Pat McGuigan James M. Ferryman
2 John Collins Daniel T. Welch
3 Sal A. Sapien Burnie Dunlap
5 Jan Debay William G. Steiner
6 James M. Ferryman Jan Debay
7 Barry Hammond Thomas R. Saltarelli
11 Victor Leipzig Shirley Dettloff
13 John M. Gullixson Bob Zemel
14 Thomas R. Saltarelli Mark A. Murphy
Annual nominations for Joint Chair are made at the regular June meeting and the election takes
place at the regular July meeting. Annual nominations and election of the Vice Joint Chair are
conducted at the regular July Meeting.
J1WPDOCSSV G96MAYM5.4
r,
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
MAY 22, 1996
Agenda Item (9): consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying
payment of claims of the joint and individual
Districts (each Director shall be called only once
and that vote will be regarded as the same for each
District represented unless a Director expresses a
desire to vote differently for any District).
Summary
See attached listing of claim payments.
Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of payment of claims listing.
11WPWL�BNGPAMPYB315.8
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4112/96 PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 04/17/95 POSTING DATE 04117AT5
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
151202 AGU $17.50 PUBLICATION
151203 ASL CONSULTING ENGINEERS $423.00 ATWOOD SUSTRUNK PLAN PREPARATION
161204 AT&T-MEGACOM SERVICE $2.737.02 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
151205 AT&T-CELLULAR CR&R $5.05 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
151206 A-Z LOGIC SYSTEMS $356.96 LAB SUPPLIES
V11207 ABANNER IDEA $59.26 OFFICE SUPPLIES
15120E ADVANCED COOLING TECHNOLOGY $420.00 ELECTRICPARTS
151209 AIR&WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOC. $295.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
151210 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $36.664.58 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.0.8.9-09
/51211 AIR&WASTE MGMT.ASSOC. $6544 PUBLICATION
151212 ASCE CONTINUING EDUCATION $165.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING
151213 AMERICAN AIRLINES $448.40 TRAVEL SERVICES
151214 THE BOND BUYER $85B.77 SUBSCRIPTION
151215 AMERICAN PAYROLL ASSOC. $124.95 PUBLICATION
15121E AMERICAN SIGMA $20,528,55 TESTING SUPPLIES
151217 AMERICAN VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS $9,695.86 COMPUTER PARTS
151218 AMOCO ENERGY TRADING $47,266.96 NATURAL GAS M06-28-95
151219 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION $24,067.00 SEWERREPAIRS
151220 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL $1.260.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
151221 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $2,270.20 NOTICES&ADS
151222 APPLE ONE $5,958.92 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
151223 AQUATIC BIOASSAY&CONSULTANTS $5.905.00 LAB SERVICES
151224 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT $2,200.74 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
151226 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE,INC. $310.40 TOXIC WASTE REMOVAL
151226 ASSOCIATED CONCRETE PRODUCTS $290.93 BUILDING MATERIALS
151227 ATKIWJONES COMPUTER SERVICE $321.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT
151220 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $3.632.37 PAYROLL SERVICES
151229 AWARDS&TROPHIES $33.40 PLAQUES
151230 BKK LANDFILL $2,272.16 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10.9-91
151231 E S BABCOCK&SONS INC $1,024.00 LAB ANALYSIS
151232 BANANA BLUEPRINT $1,240.98 PRINTING M.0.11-07-94
151233 BANCROFT-WHITNEY CO.. $340.21 PUBLICATION
151234 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $378.59 BATTERIES
151235 BAUER COMPRESSOR $693.22 COMPRESSOR PARTS
161238 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $3,421.82 LAB SUPPLIES
161237 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $329.15 TRUCK WASH TICKETS
161238 A BIEDERMAN,INC. $918.71 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
151239 WT BILJARD $345.11 BUILDING REPAIRS
151240 BIO-GRO DIVISION $45.871.58 RESIDUALS REMOVAL NO 4-26.95
151241 BISHOP'S SANITARY $420.23 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
151242 BOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE $193.95 TRUCK REPAIRS
151243 BON-A-RUES $498.88 TRUCK PARTS
151244 BOOTBARN $360.63 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES
161246 CA P $149.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
151246 C.L.TECHNOLOGY $720,00 GAS ANALYSIS SERVICES
151247 CS COMPANY $7,782.49 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
FUND NO 9199 - JF DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4112/96 PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID D4/17/95 POSTING DATE 04/17/95
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
151248 CALIF ASSOC.OF SAN.AGENCIES $130.00 WORK CONFERENCE REGISTRATION
161249 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $977.56 SERVICE AGREEMENT
151250 CALIF.DEBT ADVISORY $125.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
151251 CALIFORNIA LABORATORIES&DEV $704.00 FUME HOODS DISPOSAL
151252 CALLAN ASSOCIATES,INC. $4.978.78 INVESTMENT ADVISOR SERVICES
151253 CAMALI CORP. $2.569.61 SERVICE AGREEMENT
151254 CAPITAL ENQUIRY,INC. $165.36 PUBLICATION
151255 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $4.806.15 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-38,J-33
151256 CASA $260.00 WORK CONFERENCE REGISTRATION
151257 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $798.31 OFFICE FURNITURE
151258 CENTURY SAFETY INST.&SUPPLY $1,635.11 SAFETY SUPPLIES
151259 CHEMWEST,INC. $96.84 PUMP PARTS
151260 KIMBERLY CHRISTENSEN $1,113.34 TRAINING EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
151261 CLEMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL $14,000.00 CONSULTANT-LANDFILL PROJECT MO 7-31-95
151262 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $220.84 SERVICE AGREEMENT
151263 COUCH&SONS $69.283.80 CONSTRUCTION M-044
151264 COMMUNICATIONS PERFORMANCE GRP $4,000.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
151265 COMPUSERVE $305.39 COMPUTER SERVICES
151266 CONNELL GM PARTS I DIV. $165.63 TRUCK PARTS
151267 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $2,152.63 ELECTRIC PARTS
151265 CONSOLIDATED PLASTICS CO. $341.97 PUMP
151269 CONSUMER PIPE $85.67 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
151270 CONTINENTAL EQUIPMENT&SUPPLY $66.93 TOOLS
151271 COOK BROTHERS $437.37 VALVE
151272 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $1.021.90 ENGINE PARTS
161273 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $359.35 TRUCK PARTS
151274 CRANE PRO SERVICES $416.09 CRANE REPAIR
151275 CSUS FOUNDATION $108.26 OPERATOR TRAINING
151276 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION $230.02 FUELTAXES
151277 DME,INC. $555.98 COMPRESSOR PARTS
151278 DAILY PILOT $222.00 NOTICES&ADS
151279 DELL MARKETING LP. $16.189.98 COMPUTER
151280 DEL MAR ANALYTICAL $950.00 LABANALYSIS
161281 DEZURICK AND/OR CS CO. $2,025.66 VALVES
151282 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $392.51 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
151283 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $940.00 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE
151284 OVALS SALES $81.00 FITTINGS
151285 ESP NORTH $666.75 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
151286 ENCHANTER,INC. $2.600.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5-24-95 -
151287 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $867.70 LAB SUPPLIES
151288 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE CENTER $399.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
151289 FLUID TECH.SALES $226.91 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
161290 F&M WELDING,INC. $8,566.12 HAND RAILS
151291 FMC CORPORATION $41,054.34 HYDROGEN PEROXIDE MO9-1494
151292 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $4,181.25 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.1U-9-91
151293 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $33.25 AIR FREIGHT
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4112196 PAGE 3
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 04/17/95 POSTING DATE 04I17195
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
151294 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $181.11 FILTERS
151295 FIRST CHOICE $2,981.34 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT
151296 FORMA SCIENTIFIC,INC. $9.203.25 LAB SUPPLIES
161291 CLIFFORD A FORKERT $1,812.50 SURVEYING SERVICES MO 64.95
161298 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $309.72 PHOTO SUPPLIES
151299 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $11,101.80 WATER USE
151300 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $225.74 PAINT SUPPLIES
151301 FRANKLIN ELECTRONIC PUBLISHERS $123.83 PUBLICATIONS
151302 CITY OF FULLERTON $116.16 WATER USE
151303 EST,INC. $12,258.60 OFFICE SUPPLIES
151304 GTE TELEPHONE OPERATIONS $2.184.29 TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT
151305 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $3.363.63 CHEMICALS
151308 BE IND 8 POWER SYSTEMS $3,699.60 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
161307 GENERAL PETROLEUM $9.042.86 GASOLINE
151308 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1,051.39 TELEPHONE SERVICES
151309 GIERLICH-MITCHELL,INC. $2.055.94 PUMP PARTS
151310 GRASSY S.T.I. $1.169.29 ENGINE PARTS
151311 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $201.09 PRINTING
161312 DGA CONSULTANTS $6,340.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.64-94
161313 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $95.32 TRUCK PARTS
151314 HARBOUR ENGINEERING $5,191.80 MECHANICAL PARTS
151315 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $129.15 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
161316 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS $2.190.00 CONTAINER RENTALS
161317 PL HAWN CO,INC. $6,245.19 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
151318 HELLO $218.95 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
151319 HELPMATES PERSONNEL SERVICES $7,634.01 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
151320 HILTI,INC. $6.185.88 TOOLS
151321 HOME DEPOT $640.64 SMALL HARDWARE
151322 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $256.66 PAINT SUPPLIES
151323 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $22.323.24 WATER USE
151324 HUNTINGTON AMC I JEEP I RENAULT $176.60 AUTO PARTS
151325 IAML $1.675.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING
151328 IDM CONTROLS,INC. $530.13 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
151327 IPCO SAFETY $869.33 SAFETY SUPPLIES
161328 IMAGING PLUS $550.46 OFFICE SUPPLIES
161329 INDUSTRIAL FILTER MFG. $2.400.00 FILTER
161330 INDUSTRIAL STEAM $1.377.20 PUMP
151331 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $1.334.42 CONNECTORS
161332 ISI INFORTEXT $770.42 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
151333 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. $75.68 TRUCK PARTS
151334 INNOVATION GROUP WEST $520.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING
161335 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $1.131.48 BATTERIES
161336 IRVINE PHOTO GRAPHICS $13.67 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
161337 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $10.44 WATER USE
151338 J2 PRINTING SERVICES $386.26 PRINTING
161339 JH RECOGNITION CO. $853.17 SERVICE AWARDS
FUND NO 0199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4112M PAGE 4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 04117/95 POSTING DATE 04/17/95
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
151340 JAMISON ENGINEERING $2,000.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
151341 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $279.46 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
151342 JAYS CATERING $597.34 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE
161343 KALLEEN'S COMPUTER PRODUCTS $143.67 COMPUTER SUPPLIES
151344 KEMIRON PACIFIC.INC. $170,320.60 FERRIC CHLORIDE MO 9.27-96
161345 KING BEARING,INC. $460.27 MACHINE SUPPLIES
151346 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $2.055.05 TOOLS
151347 PENNY KYLE $220.05 TRAINING EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
151348 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $1,232.87 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICE
151349 LAMOTTE COMPANY $81.97 SULFIDE TEST KIT
151350 LAW/CRANDAL,INC. $1,530.00 SOIL TESTING 7-13-94
151351 ORANGE COUNTY DIVISION $30.75 PUBLICATION
151352 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES $95.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING
151353 LIKE NU TILE $280.00 RESTROOM TILE REPAIR
151354 MEC ANALYTICAL $1,108.00 LAB ANALYSIS
151355 R.F.MACDONALD CO. $29.45 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
151356 MANDIC MOTORS $45.00 TOWING SERVICES
161357 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION.INC. $1.259,733.50 CONSTRUCTION P1-36-2
151358 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $195.42 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
151359 MIKE MCCARTHY BUICK,INC. $17,220.76 NEW TRUCK
151380 DONALD F.MCINTYRE $216.93 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
151361 MIDWAY MFG.&MACHINING $375.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS
161362 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3,998.81 UNIFORM RENTALS
151363 MONITOR LABS $120.78 INSTRUMENT
151364 MOODYS INVESTORS SERVICE $7,500.00 COP RATING MAINTENANCE FEES
151365 MORGAN COMPANY $520.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
151366 MORTON SALT $516.36 SALT
161387 SAM MOW13RAY $1.053.42 TRAINING EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
151368 THE NEWS $76.00 SUBSCRIPTION
151369 NICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY $2.935.65 LUBRICANTS/DIESEL FUEL
151370 NORTEL PRODUCT TRAINING $2,660.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
151371 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $1,212.77 SAFETY GLASSES
151372 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $13,217.27 OFFICE SUPPLIES
161373 OLSTEN STAFFING SERVICES $3,584.00 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
151374 ROBERTJ.00TEN $165.00 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
151375 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL $2.707.44 CHEMICALS
151376 ORANGE COUNTY PUMP CO. $4,048.76 PUMPS
161377 ORANGE COURIER $182.95 COURIER SERVICES
151378 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. $339.27 FITTINGS
151379 OXYGEN SERVICE $1,746.70 SPECIALTY GASES
151380 COUNTY OF ORANGE $90.00 AUDIT/CONT.PROCESSING FEE
151381 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $5.743.98 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP
151352 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT $37,753.80 GAP WATER USE M.O.6.9-93
161383 PC SERVICE SOURCE $114.00 PRINTER PARTS
151384 PACIFIC PARTS $6.960.10 INSTRUMENT PARTS
151385 PACIFIC BELL $15.12 TELEPHONE SERVICES
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/12MG PAGE 5
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 04/11/95 POSTING DATE 04JI7195
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
151386 PADGETT - THOMPSON $346.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
151387 PARKHOUSE TIRE,INC. $392.21 TIRES
151388 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $659.25 REIMB.PETTY CASH
151389 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS $7,416,85 CONSULTING SERVICE
151390 POLYPURE,INC. $20,015.93 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92
151391 POWER SYSTEMS $236.99 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
151392 PROCESS CONTROL SYSTEMS $104.19 REPAIR
151393 PRYOR RESOURCES,INC. $99.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING
151394 PUBLIC SECTOR EXCELLENCE $3.150.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING CONSULTANT
151395 RJN GROUP,INC. $995.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
151396 RMCONTROLS $41.41 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
151397 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $2.082.75 TRASH REMOVAL
151398 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO. $241.88 LAB SUPPLIES
151399 REAL TIME SYSTEMS CDR $8.135.20 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
151400 RED WING SHOES $143.09 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES
151401 BOLT DELIVERY $24.00 FREIGHT
151402 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DIST. $2.152.92 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
151403 RENOLD INC. $60.59 MECHANICAL PARTS
151404 RM MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL $373.80 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
151405 RYAN-HERCO $33.46 METAL
151406 JOSEPH T.RYERSON&SON,INC. $1.742.88 METAL PLATES
151407 SAFETY WEST $52.43 INSTRUMENT PARTS
151408 SANTA FIE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $1,747.38 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
151409 SARTORIUS CORP. 5255.00 LAB SUPPLIES
151410 SCHWING AMERICA,INC. $1.022.70 PUMP PARTS
151411 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTL $18.120.91 OCEAN MONITORING MO 6.28-95
161412 SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS,INC. $976.70 LAB REPAIRS
151413 SEA COAST DESIGNS $309.78 LAB SUPPLIES
151414 CITY OF SEAL BEACH $643.96 WATER USE
151415 SELCO PRODUCTS CO. $367.27 METER
151416 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $1.199.96 TOOLS
161417 SHURELUCK SALES $8,39B.48 TOOLSMARDWARE
151418 SIEMON,LARSON&MARSH $1,226.00 LEGAL SERVICES
151419 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $350.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS
151420 THE SMITH GROUP $1,237.30 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
151421 SOUTH COAST WATER $520.00 LAB SUPPLIES
151422 SO CALIF EDISON CO $18.54 POWER
151423 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $1.003.45 NATURAL GAS
151424 SO.CALIFORNIA MARINE INST. $800.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
151425 SPEX CHEMICAL&SAMPLE PREP $1.098.05 LAB SUPPLIES
151426 SRECO FLEXIBLE $6.066.33 SAFETY SUPPLIES
151427 STANDARD&POORS CORP $1,000.00 COP CONTRACT SERVICE
151426 SUPERB ONE-HOUR PHOTO $21.84 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
151429 SUPER CHEM CORP. $1,553.06 CHEMICALS
161430 SUPER ICE CORP. $80.22 LAB SUPPLIES
151431 TESTAR MVS/DIV CERPLEX $431.00 COMPUTER REPAIR
FUNDNO 9199 JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 4112MB PAGES
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 04/17/95 POSTING DATE 04/17195
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
151432 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $3,360.46 MECHANICAL PARTS
151433 TOSHIBA INTERNATIONAL $1,998.40 INSTRUMENT PARTS
151434 DANIEL TREMBLAY $1,939.98 TRAINING EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
151435 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $578.30 TRUCK PARTS
161436 JG TUCKER&SON,INC. $2,000.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS
151437 UNISOURCEB/OR BUTLER PAPER $545.23 OFFICE SUPPLIES
151438 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $35.09 PARCEL SERVICES
151439 UNIV OF TEXAS/AUSTIN $500.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
151440 VWR SCIENTIFIC $4,810.19 LAB SUPPLIES
151441 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $63.21 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
151442 VERTEX TECHNOLOGIES,INC. $939.40 FIBER OPTICS
151443 VORTEX INDUSTRIES $925.00 BUILDING REPAIRS
151444 WACKENHUT CORP. $3,389.68 CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS
151445 WALCON CONSTRUCTION CO. $232,522.71 CONSTRUCTION 5-37-3
151446 CARL WARREN&CO. $5,043.93 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR
161447 WAXIE $792.77 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
161448 WESTINGHOUSE,ENERGY SER. $1.450.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
151449 WESTIN SANTA CLARA $240.90 HOTEL RESERVATIONS
151450 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $1,445.91 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
151451 WHATMAN $792.09 LAB SUPPLIES
151452 NANCY WHEATLEY $507.24 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
151453 WHESSOE VAREC $585.00 VALVES
151464 JUDITH A.WILSON $77.18 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
151455 WITEG $411.61 LAB SUPPLIES
151456 WOLFE AND ASSOCIATES,INC. $280.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
151457 XEROX CORP. $2,860.58 COPIER LEASES
151458 MOYASAR T.YAHYA $588.40 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
TOTAL CALIMS PAID OO117/96 $2.476.270.54
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/12196 PAGE 7
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 04/17195 POSTING DATE 04/17/95
SUMMARY AMOUNT
#1 OPER FUND $894.00
02 OPER FUND $2.G07.16
03 OPER FUND $2,451.60
#3 CAP FAC FUND $7,090.00
fly OPER FUND $177.00
A6 OPER FUND $48.00
06 CAP FAC FUND $24,067.00
W7 OPER FUND $442.15
#7 CAP FAC FUND 5440.65
A11 OPER FUND $76.60
#11 CAP FAC FUND $5,020.80
p566 OPER FUND $28.59
0566 CAP FAC FUND $243.253.47
JT OPER FUND $573.666.89
CORP $1,450,407.02
SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $5,043.93
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $161.155.48
$2,476.270.54
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 04R9FJ8 PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 05/01/96 POSTING DATE 0510V96
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
151496 ASM PUBLISHING SERVICE $1,597.50 PUBLICATIONS
151497 ATM AA,INC. $4,905.00 LAB SERVICES
151498 ACADEMIC PRESS $21.50 PUBLICATIONS
151499 ADVANCED ENGINE TECH CORP. $15,720.85 ENGINE TESTING J-19
151500 AMERIDATA $1.073.89 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
151501 AMERICAN AIR FILTER,INC. $282.78 MECHANICAL PARTS
151502 AMSA $525.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
151503 AMSA $525.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING
151604 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION $1,424.04 SEWER REPAIRS
151505 ANALYSTSINC $2.666.39 MECHANICAL PARTS
151505 ANIXTER-DISTRIBUTION $393.56 COMPUTER SUPPLIES
151507 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $1,191.61 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
151509 AWARDS&TROPHIES $48.49 PLAQUES
151509 BKK LANDFILL $2,935.45 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.1&9-91
151510 BANANA BLUEPRINT $3,129.45 PRINTING M.O.11-07-94
151511 BANK OF AMERICA $20.27 BANKING SERVICES
151512 SHABBIR S.BASMI $275.19 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
151513 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $96.19 BATTERIES
151514 BAUER COMPRESSOR $127.69 COMPRESSOR PARTS
151515 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $20.00 TRUCK WASH TICKETS
151516 BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS $85.27 LAB EQUIPMENT
151517 BERENSON COMMUNICATIONS 5282.09 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
161518 BEV CUSTER $508.58 MAPS
161519 BIO-GRO DIVISION $41,503.91 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO a2&95
1615" BLACK EMP.&EDU.JOURNAL $495.00 PUBLICATION
151521 BRITHINEE ELECTRIC $236.41 ELECTRIC PARTS
151522 BROOKS INSTRUMENT DIV. $23692 INSTRUMENT
151623 BUDGET JANITORIAL $3,330.00 JANITORIAL SERVICES MO 1-12-94
151524 BUSH&ASSOCIATES,INC. $1,070.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6.8.94
151525 C.L.TECHNOLOGY $720.00 GAS ANALYSIS SERVICES
161626 CS COMPANY $1,762AS PLUMBING SUPPLIES
151527 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH INC. $740.29 LAB SUPPLIES
1615M CALIFORNIA AUTO COLLISION,INC. $338.17 TRUCK BODY REPAIR.
151529 THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CA. $195.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING
151530 CASA $130.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING
151531 CENTURY MICRO PRODUCTS $5,989.83 COMPUTER SUPPLIES
151532 CENTURY SAFETY INST.&SUPPLY $89.77 SAFETY SUPPLIES
151533 COAST&OCEAN $18.00 SUBSCRIPTION
151534 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $300.00 SERVICEAGREEMENT
151535 COLEMANICASKEY ARCHITECTS $42,177.30 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MO 11.1&95
151535 COLOR ARTS INC $2,814.73 PRINTING SERVICES
151537 COLTON EQUIPMENT CO $402.50 CRANE INSPECTION
151538 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $7,542.50 PUMP PARTS
151530 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $3,297.71 ELECTRIC PARTS
151540 CONSOLIDATED PLASTICS CO $180.16 LAB SUPPLIES
151541 CONSOLIDATED REPROGRAPHICS $52.15 PRINTING SERVICES
FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 0429196 PAGE2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 05/01190 POSTING DATE 05/01/96
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
151542 CONSUMER PIPE $595.33 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
151543 CONTINENTAL EQUIPMENT&SUPPLY $177.61 TOOLS
151544 CONTROL DESIGN SUPPLY $223.17 ELECTRIC PARTS
151546 CONTROL SPECIALISTS INC $205.72 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
151546 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $1.003.23 ENGINE PARTS
151647 COORDINATED EQUIP CO INC $125.00 CRANE CERTIFICATION
151548 COUNTERPART ENTERPRISES $829.59 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
151549 COUNTY CLERK $36.00 ANNEXATION FEE
151550 COUNTY CLERK $35.00 ANNEXATION FEE
151551 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $837.70 ELECTRIC PARTS
151552 JAMESCOWAN 6108.00 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
151553 CALIFORNIA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE $322.40 PUBLICATIONS
151554 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 619,584.00 UNEMPLOYMENT CHARGES
151555 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION E2429 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK FEE
151556 DAPPERTIRE $776.51 TIRES
151557 JAMES DARLINGTON $2,887.50 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
151558 DATASTORM $87.45 SOFTWARE
151659 ALBERT W.DAVIES,INC. $936,404.08 CONSTRUCTION 3-3611
151560 TOM DAWES $347.71 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
151551 DE GUELLE&SONS GLASS CO $64.29 SAFETY GLASS
151562 DELL MARKETING L.P. ST1,008.95 COMPUTERS
151563 DEL MAR ANALYTICAL $1.410.00 SIOSOUDS ANALYSIS
151564 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIF. $57,540.31 DENTAL INSURANCE PLAN M.O.1-12-94
151565 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $1,790.81 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
151566 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $115.00 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE
151567 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $562.73 PAINT SUPPLIES
151568 ESP NORTH $823.48 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
151669 ENCHANTER,INC. &3,500.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5-24-95
151570 EXCALIBUR ENTERPRISES $5.279.95 NIGHT VISION VIDEO CAMERA
151571 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $2,696.26 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9.91
151572 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $307,95 AIR FREIGHT
151573 FINE SCIENCE TOOLS INC $90.27 LAB SUPPLIES
151574 FIRST CO&/OR NORTHERN DIST. SISSAI JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
151576 FISONS INSTRUMENTS &24177 SERVICE AGREEMENT
151675 FLEXI-LINER CORP $11.539.44 INSPECTION&REPAIR OF DIGESTER LINING
151577 FLICKINGER CO $998.94 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
151578 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $1.403.56 PHOTO SUPPLIES
151579 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $315.50 PAINT SUPPLIES
151580 FRANCE COMPRESSOR PRODUCT $1.534.33 VALVE GUIDE
151581 FRYS ELECTRONICS $5,801.03 ELECTRONIC COMPUTER SUPPLIES
151582 GASB $76.00 PUBLICATION
151553 CST,INC. $8.871.38 OFFICE SUPPLIES
151564 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $630.76 LUMBER/HARDWARE
151555 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1,211.87 TELEPHONE SERVICES
151586 GIERLICH-MITCHELL,INC. $11,510.93 PUMP PARTS
151587 WAN GRAINGER.INC. 9103.48 COMPRESSOR PARTS
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 04129M PAGES
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 05101/96 POSTING DATE 05/01196
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
151588 GRASBY S.T.I. $1.121.75 ENGINE PARTS
151589 GRASEBY ANDERSEN $1,065.24 LAB SUPPLIES
151590 GRATING PACIFIC,INC $1.940.20 FIBERGLASS GRATING
151591 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $101.47 PRINTING
151592 DOA CONSULTANTS $4,180.00 SURVEYING SERVICES 3.36R
151593 DAVID M GRIFFITH&ASSOC. 53,209.15 LAB MANAGER RECRUITMENT
151594 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $1.024.78 TRUCK PARTS
151595 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $372.12 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
151598 HELPMATES PERSONNEL SERVICES 5603.88 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
161597 HERBS BLACK FOREST BAKERY $389.00 MEETING EXPENSE
151598 HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT $2.083.33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN.
151599 HOLMES&NARVER,INC. $22,384.29 ENGINEERING SERVICES Pi44
151500 HOME DEPOT $152.34 SMALL HARDWARE
151601 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $317.51 PAINT SUPPLIES
151602 IDEXX $132.63 LAB SUPPLIES
151603 IPCO SAFETY S1,904.92 SAFETY SUPPLIES
151604 IMAGING PLUS $04.09 OFFICE SUPPLIES
151605 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. $600.00 TRUCK PARTS
151606 INORGANIC VENTURES $239.87 LAB SUPPLIES
151607 INTEGRATED URBAN FORESTRY $450.00 FIELD INSPECTION&ANALYSIS
151608 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $1,094.85 BATTERIES
151609 IRVINE PHOTO GRAPHICS $143.26 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
151610 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $4.90 WATER USE
151611 JAMISON ENGINEERING $2.477.14 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
151812 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $618.73 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
15UH3 JAYS CATERING $903.66 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE
151614 JETFORM CORP. $305.00 PUBLICATIONS
151615 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $311.43 ELECTRIC PARTS
151816 JONES HALL HILL&WHITE $0.707.76 BOND COUNSEL SERVICES MOOI-24-96
151617 KALLEENS COMPUTER PRODUCTS $1,799.07 COMPUTER SUPPLIES
151618 KEENAN SUPPLY $895.61 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
151619 KING BEARING,INC. $1,782.58 MACHINE SUPPLIES
151620 KIRWAN COMPANY $640.80 MISCELLANEOUS HARDWARE
151621 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $2,965.64 TOOLS
151522 LAMOTTE COMPANY $76.93 SULFIDETESTKIT
151623 LAIDLAW ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES $190.00 WASTE DISPOSAL
151624 LASHER DODGE $13.533.69 PICK-UP TRUCK
151525 LIEBERT CORPORATION $26.883.64 ELECTRIC PARTS
151626 LOCALAGENCY $3.900.00 ANNEXATION FEE
151627 LOCAL AGENCY $950.00 ANNEXATION FEE
151628 CITY OF LOS ANGELES $1.60 CONNECTION FEE
151629 LUCCI'S $124.00 MEETING EXPENSE
151630 MPS $64.35 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
151631 MACOMCO $928.20 SERVICE AGREEMENT
151632 MSA $600.08 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
1511633 MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY CORP. $451.26 MISCELLANEOUS HARDWARE
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 04/29M6 PAGE 4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 05101/96 POSTING DATE 05M1/96
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
151634 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS,INC. $3.260.95 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
151635 DENISE MARTINEZ $125.38 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
151636 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $71.35 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
151637 MELLON TRUST $20,139.17 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
151638 MICRO MOTION $856.71 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
151639 MICROFLEX MEDICAL CORP $365.00 SAFETY SUPPLIES
IS1640 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3.182.75 UNIFORM RENTALS
161641 NAGDCA $300.00 ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP
151642 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES $1,062.50 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES
161643 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $915.01 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
151644 NEUTRON $1,846.79 ANIONIC POLYMER M.O.8-10,94
151646 NICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY $9.557.07 LUBRICANTSIDIESEL FUEL
151646 NORCAL CONTROLS,INC. $306.43 INSTRUMENT PARTS
161647 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $1.050.08 OFFICE SUPPLIES
151648 OMNI WESTERN INC $256.86 TOOLS
151549 ROBERT J OOTEN $762.61 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
151660 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE S4,539.06 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
151651 ORANGE COURIER $141.15 COURIER SERVICES
151652 ORANGE VALVE 8 FITTING CO. $746.21 FITTINGS
151653 OXYGEN SERVICE $2,040.93 SPECIALTY GASES
151664 COUNTY OF ORANGE $270.00 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE
151655 PSSI $7,097.85 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION
151656 PACIFIC INVESTMENT MOMT CO $149,644.00 INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT SERVICES
151657 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $395.00 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
151658 PACIFIC PARTS $139.17 INSTRUMENT PARTS
151659 PACIFIC BELL $1,172.44 TELEPHONE SERVICES
151660 PADRE JANITORIAL SUPPLY $293.51 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
151661 PARAGON CABLE $36.78 CABLE SERVICES
151662 PARTS UNLIMITED $988.66 TRUCK PARTS
151663 PASCAL B LUDWIG $106.796.00 CONSTRUCTION P2413A
1516" PEERLESS WIPING MATERIALS $721.93 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
161665 PERMA SEAL $182.91 LURE OIL
151666 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $745.38 REIMS.PETTY CASH,TRAINING 8 TRAVEL
151667 WILLIAM PIERCE $572.80 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
151668 POLYMETRICS,INC. $1,262.75 IAO SUPPLIES
151669 POWER SYSTEMS $147.88 MECHANICAL PARTS
151670 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $88.00 ICE FOR SAMPLES
151671 PUMP ENGINEERING $1.000.03 PUMP PARTS
151672 PUMPING SOLUTIONS INC $564.40 PUMP PARTS
161673 PUTZMEISTER,INC. $505.56 PUMP PARTS
151674 OUICKSTART TECHNOLOGIES $3.750.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
151675 RD SYSTEMS,INC $246.00 CAMERA REPAIR
151876 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $308.85 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS
151677 R 8 R INSTRUMENTS $385.82 ELECTRIC PARTS
151678 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO. $903.91 LAB SUPPLIES
161679 RED WING SHOES $277.29 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES
FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST,WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0 Q9/96 PAGES
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 05/01/96 POSTING DATE 05101/96
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
161680 SOLT DELIVERY $72.00 FREIGHT
151651 RENOLD INC. $741.73 MECHANICAL PARTS
151682 RONAN ENGINEERING CO $142.60 ALARM PANEL RELAY
151683 RYAN-HERCO $30.90 METAL
151684 SAWA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $1,535.38 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
151685 SARTORIUS CORP. $85.00 LAB SUPPLIES
151686 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $167.18 SPECIALTY GASES
161687 SEA COAST DESIGNS $297.19 LAB SUPPLIES
151688 SEAL PRO INC $2.718.35 MECHANICAL PARTS
161689 SEARS ROEBUCK&CO $124.27 TOOLS
151690 SENTIENT SYSTEMS,INC. $2.882.56 FACILITATOR SERVICES
151691 SEWER EQUIP CO OF AMERICA $1.201.48 LEADER HOSE
151692 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $302.70 TOOLS
151693 SHURELUCK SALES $4,188.53 TOOLS0IARDWARE
151694 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $962.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS
151695 SMITH-EMERY CO. $162.00 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-13.94
151696 SMITH PIPE&SUPPLY $155.12 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
151697 SNAP ON I SUN CORP $964.43 TOOLS
151698 SO CALIF EDISON CO $27.680.91 POWER
151699 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $8.853.99 NATURAL GAS
151700 SPARLING INSTRUMENT CO.,INC. $250.00 METER
151701 SQUARED/CRISP AUTOMATION SYSTEMS $2.834.00 ELECTRICAL REPAIR
151702 STANDARD SUPP&EQUIP CO $37.03 MECHANICAL PARTS
151703 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION $250.00 ANNEXATION FEE
151704 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION $250.00 ANNEXATION FEE
151705 KEITH D STOLZENBACH $1.650.00 CONSULTING SERVICES
/51706 SUMMIT STEEL $958.98 METAL
151701 SUNSETFORD $346.01 TRUCK PARTS
151700 SUPELCO,INC. $148.65 LAB SUPPLIES
151709 SUPER CHEM CORP. $2.238.41 CHEMICALS
161710 SUPER POWER PRODUCTS $517.20 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
151711 SUPREX CORP. $2,500.00 RENTALAGREEMENT
161712 SYMCAS $7.647.50 CONSULTING SERVICES
151713 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $989.46 ELECTRIC CART PARTS
151714 TENNANT CO $158.03 AUTO PARTS
151715 TEXAS COMMERCE BANK $10,472.47 COP TRUSTEE SERVICES
151716 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $597.00 MECHANICAL PARTS
151717 TONER SYSTEM INTERNATIONAL $1.290.85 PRINTER SUPPLIES
151710 TRAFFIC CONTROL ENGINEERING $1,400.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS
151719 TRENCH SHORING COMPANY $17,509.38 STEEL PLATES
151720 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $81.64 TRUCK PARTS
151721 JG TUCKER&SON,INC. $1.630.70 INSTRUMENT PARTS
151722 U.S.AUTO GLASS CENTERS $200.82 TRUCK PARTS
151723 UNISOURCES/OR BUTLER PAPER $96.33 OFFICE SUPPLIES
151724 DATAVAULT I US SAFE DEPOSIT CO $94.00 BACK-UP TAPE STORAGE
151725 VWR SCIENTIFIC $5,379.53 LAB SUPPLIES
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 04/29/96 PAGES
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 05/01/96 POSTING DATE 05/01/96
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
151728 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $832.16 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
151727 VALVATE ASSOCIATES $491.77 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
151728 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS $2.050.40 FREIGHT
151729 VERTEX TECHNOLOGIES,INC. $1.743.07 FIBER OPTICS
151730 VERTEX SYSTEMS $2,507.50 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT
151731 VORTEX INDUSTRIES $850.00 BUILDING REPAIRS
151732 WACKENHUT CORP. $6.779.36 CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS
151733 WAL-CON CONSTRUCTION CO. $/46,304.79 CONSTRUCTION P243-1
151734 WAXIE $641.00 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
161736 WEF $325.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING
151736 WEST COAST ANALYTICAL SRV $1.950.00 BIOSOLIDS ANALYSIS
161737 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $27,168.81 CAUSTIC SODA NO 8.23.95
151738 WESTIN SANTA CLARA $240.90 MANAGEMENT TRAINING-LODGING
151739 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $262.53 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
161740 WESCO $350.19 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
161741 CITY OF WESTMINSTER $256.25 SURFACE GRADING
151742 ROURKE.WOODRUFF 8 SPRADLIN $87.164.62 LEGAL SERVICES MO 7.28-95
VH743 GARY YOUNG(STATEWIDE INSTIJ $990.00 INSTALL BIOLOGICAL HOODS IN LAB
151744 ZYMARK CORP. $115.15 LAB EQUIPMENT
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 05101NO $2.150.367.83
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0429AJ8 PAGE 7
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 05/01/96 POSTING DATE 05101196
SUMMARY AMOUNT
81 OPER FUND $2.526.70
42 OPER FUND $12.876.52
02 CAP PAC FUND $12,878.49
A3 OPER FUND $18.488.56
83 CAP FAC FUND $944.807.34
85 OPER FUND $5,550.48
*6 OPER FUND $808.29
86 CAP FAC FUND $380.72
$7 OPER FUND $9,330.91
87 CAP FAC FUND $450.00
$11 OPER FUND $8,360.02
011 CAP FAC FUND $173.98
013 OPER FUND $35.61
914 OPER FUND $354.43
#14 CAP FAC FUND $122.60
85&8 CAP FAC FUND $147.228.63
A6&7 OPER FUND $213.52
87&14 OPER FUND $16.71
JT OPER FUND $305,327.31
CORP $328.632.67
SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $71,800.61
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $279,915.93
$2.150.357.83
FUND NO 9109 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE-VARIOUS PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID-MISCELLANEOUS HANDWRITE WARRANTS
WARRANT DATE WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
0411 M6 151195 ASCE TUL CONFERENCE $375.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING
04/11/96 151196 ALBARKER $15,640.13 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM
04111M 151197 COUNTY CLERK $25.00 NOTICE OF EXEMPTION FEE
04111/96 151198 ALEX FISHMAN $4.002.31 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM
0411IJ96 161199 PAULINE JOHNSTON AND $6.160.00 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM
04111MB 15120D JOEL MANCHESTER,M.D. $10.068.00 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM
04/11/96 151201 HELENE WINOGURA $7.100.93 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM
04/1528 151459 APWA $65.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
04/15/96 151460 COUNTY CLERK $38.00 NOTICE OF EXEMPTION FEE
04/15/96 151461 COUNTY CLERK $38.00 NOTICE OF EXEMPTION FEE
ON15/98 151462 UPPER NEWPORT BAY $20.00 EARTH DAY FEE
04/19196 151483 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $1,200.00 APPEAL FEE
0419/98 151464 KEYE PRODUCTIVITY CENTER $139.00 TECHNICALTRAINING
04H9/96 151465 WATERUSE MEMBERSHIP $100.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING
0424/96 151486 DONNA ANDERSON $21.95 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM
04124196 151487 HARRY CROMWELL $19,125.00 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM
0424196 151488 EMERGENCY SERVICE RESTORATION $2,144.30 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM
0424/96 151469 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT $495.00 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM
0424/96 151490 NEWPORT HARBOR LOCKSMITH $65.0D NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM
04/24/96 151491 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS INC $129.612.98 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 3.29-95
0424196 151492 WATERUSE ASSOCIATION $150.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING
0426196 151493. JOHN C.COX,JR. $200.45 CASA WORKSHOP
0426/96 151494 SAL SAPIEN $200.45 CASA WORKSHOP
0426/96 151495 PEER SWAN $200.45 CASA WORKSHOP
05101m 151745 NICHOLAS ARHONTES $543.55 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
05/01/96 151746 THE BALBOA BAY CLUB $3,376.65 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM
05/01/96 151747 GASKET ENGINEERING $90.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
05/01/96 151748 INNOVATION GROUP WEST $420.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING
O5103/96 151749 THEN BALBOA BAY CLUB $965A0 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM
O5/03/95 151750 EMERCON RESTORATION $5.967.66 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM
05/03/96 151751 MARTIN&MILDRED LITKE $4.391.42 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM
05/03/96 151752 WORLD RESTORATION $2,469.44 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM
05/09/98 151778 AMSA $526.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
05/09/98 161779 DONNAANDERSON $67.50 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM
05/09/98 151780 DE GUELLE&SONS GLASS CO $560.00 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM
05/09/95 151701 EMERSON RESTORATION $437.25 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM
O5109/96 151782 PAULINE JOHNSTON AND $3.619.19 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM
05/09/96 151783 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS INC $128,563.20 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO3-M95
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID $350.003.99
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE-VARIOUS PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANMATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID-MISCELLANEOUS HANDWRITE WARRANTS
SUMMARY AMOUNT
42 CAP FAC FUND $423.00
M3 OPER FUND $90.00
N5 OPER FUND $538.13
JT OPER FUND $251,397.49
CORF $4,333.46
SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $93,221.91
$350,003.99
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
MAY 22, 1996
District No. 7
Agenda Item (10): Consideration of Resolution No. 96-53-7
approving agreement with the County of Orange
providing for the adjustment of manholes on
District sewers in conjunction with the County's 1995-96 street resurfacing
program in unincorporated County areas within District No. 7, and providing for
payment of the actual cost of the manhole adjustment plus 10% for inspection
and administrative costs for approximately 70 manholes, at a per-manhole unit
cost not to exceed $220.00 nor be less than $155.00 per manhole; and authorizing
payment of required deposit of $13,650.00 for said work.
Summary
The Orange County Environmental Management Agency (OCEMA) is currently
undertaking an asphalt overlay program through 1996. This project will consist primarily
of resurfacing existing streets which are in OCEMA's area of responsibility. CSD 7
owns and maintains sewer systems in the area that requires resurfacing, and must pay
for the adjustment of the manholes. However, OCEMA has offered to include the
coordination and adjustment of the District's manholes in their contract. The project
includes 70 manholes at a maximum cost of$220.00 each, and depending on bids, a
minimum cost of$155.00. (The maximum and minimum provide protection to both
agencies against unbalanced bids). The deposit required is $13,650.00. Similar yearly
agreements in the past have been very successful.
Staff Recommendation
L
ests authorization to execute an agreement with the Orange County
ental Management Agency for the adjustment of CSD Ts manholes at a
cost of$220.00 each for a total amount not to exceed $15,400.00.
SW G96WAV96\5.10
r
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County,California
P.O. Box 8127. 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley,CA 9272MI27
Telephone: (714)962-2411
DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE
Wednesday, April 24, 1996 - 5:30 p.m.
A meeting of the Steering Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held Wednesday, April 24, 1996, at
5:30 p.m., at the Districts' Administrative office.
(1) ROLL CALL
The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
STEERING COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT:
Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel
Present:
John C. Cox, Jr., Joint Chair
Peer A. Swan, Vice Joint Chair STAFF PRESENT:
George Brown, Chair, FAHR Blake P. Anderson, Assistant General Manager
John J. Collins, Chair, PDC Judith A. Wilson, Assistant General Manager
Pat McGuigan, Chair, OMTS Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary
Roger Stanton, Vice Chair, FAHR
Absent:
None
(2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no comments by any member of the public.
(4) APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of the March 27, 1996 Steering Committee meeting were approved
as drafted.
p
Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting
Page 2
April 24, 1996
(5) REPORTS OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR, GENERAL MANAGER AND
GENERAL COUNSEL
(a) Report of Committee Chair.
There was no report by the Committee Chairman.
(b) Report of General Manager.
In the absence of the General Manager, Assistant General Manager—
Administration Judy Wilson reported on proposed changes to the agenda
process. A motion was made, seconded and passed to approve the
recommendation of the Board Secretary to only include summary reports
on action items unanimously approved by Committees unless directed
otherwise by the Committee Chair. The Committee agreed to try the
change for 90 days with the understanding that at the bottom of the
agenda item a summary sentence will be included that states, "If copies of
the staff report or further information is requested, contact ° The
lead staff person will contact the Committee Chair after the Committee
meeting to see if there are any staff reports they would like sent out in full.
(c) Report of General Counsel.
General Counsel Tom Woodruff reported that the Pringle Bill was heard
and is out of Committee. However, it is anticipated that the bill will not go
forward in its present form. There appears to be a commitment from the
speaker that there are problems with the current language, and a
cooperative effort would be undertaken to refine it. This bill only applies to
Orange County and there are three specific targets: Garden Grove
Sanitary District, the 18 south county water and sewer agencies, and
IRWD because of their"excess monies."
(6) DISCUSSION ITEMS
(a) Update on Activities re Landfill Acquisition.
Blake Anderson reported that there are several clean-up items that need
to be finalized. The Board of Supervisors are in receipt of our letter asking
for our$100,000 back. Staff is considering "selling" the County the
information we discovered on the closed landfill sites for about $100,000.
Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting
Page 3
April 24, 1996
Some consultant fees are still outstanding. Staff has been negotiating with
Price Waterhouse and Saybrook, which resulted in a 14% reduction from
each of their original billings. A report will be made to the May FAHR
Committee. The total cost for this task is approximately $400,000,
including the $100,000 deposit.
(b) Status Report on '96-97 Budget
Judy Wilson reported on the progress of the '96-97 budget. The
anticipated dollars per million gallons ($/mg)for next year is at $587
representing a budget of$51.4 million, a 6% decrease from lhe '95-96
adopted budget of $58.1 million and $620/mg. The authorized position
count is down by 33 and could be lower after the Information Technology
audit. This information will be presented to the FAHR Committee in May
and the other Committees in June.
The CORF budget is at $45 million, of which 85% is for continuing
projects. Most other projects are on hold, waiting on the completion of the
new Strategic Plan. This budget will be presented to all Committees in
May.
Director Swan expressed concern that the comparison of the '96-97
budget should be to the actual '95-96 expenditures rather than the
budgeted amounts. He also indicated that we know that the staffing
numbers are too high, yet additional positions are being requested.
Directors Cox, Swan and Brown all indicated that we should try to develop
a budget that actually"targets" for where we want to be, rather than having
a target that is the budget we propose.
Director Swan discussed "real world pain," as experienced at his firm. He
said that reductions through attrition are not enough. Judy indicated that
the General Manager has said that he is not in favor of layoffs; that there
needs to time allowed to implement some of the major programs and
complete four major management audits to determine efficiencies.
Director McGuigan said that we need to get the new structure in place
before making any major reductions.
Blake Anderson addressed the discussions we have had with EMA and the
strategies we hope to put in place. It will take us time to put automation in
place prior to our being able to reduce staff. Staff is already working on
some aspect of EMA's recommendations, including the combination of
Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting
Page 4
April24, 1996
several divisions of the Operations and Maintenance Departments so that
cross-training and work force flexibility can begin to be utilized.
Judy indicated that all trends are downward and that the General Manager
is committed to making this happen, but it would take about 3 to 5 years.
She will take the Committee's message back to staff.
(c) Report on County of Orange Plan of Adjustment.
Blake Anderson reported that the final agreement which was previously
approved has defined our participation in the Plan of Adjustment. An
analysis of the deal with Option B members was faxed to all directors. The
OCIP met and unanimously agreed to not oppose the settlement between
the County and Option Bs. The County will file the Plan of Adjustment with
the Bankruptcy Court in May and it should be approved. This opens the
way for the County to secure bonds in June. It is anticipated that the
County will be out of bankruptcy by the end of June.
The discovery on the Merrill Lynch case continues to go forward.
Depositions will probably extend well into 1997.
There is no longer recourse against the County for either Option A or B
participants.
(d) Review of Committee Action Items for May Meetings.
There will be a couple more items added to the PDC Committee agenda
for May.
(7) CLOSED SESSION
There was no closed session.
(8) OTHER BUSINESS
There was no other business discussed.
Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting
Page 5
April 24, 1996
(9) MATTERS TO BE REPORTED AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING
The changes to the Joint Boards agenda will be reviewed at the July Steering
Committee meeting.
(10) MATTERS ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT
There were no matters for a future agenda.
(11) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS
The next meeting has been scheduled for May 22, 1996 at 5:30 p.m.
(12) ADJOURNMENT
The Steering Committee adjourned at approximately 6:25 p.m.
Submitted by:
e n Tappan, Ste($incf Committee Secretary
J MGP..`(.GMISIRLOMM188NP 20M MIN
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
P.O.Box 8127. 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92728.8127
Telephone: (714)962-2411
DRAFT
MINUTES OF OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND
TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE
WEDNESDAY, MAY 1. 1996 -5:30 p.m.
A regular meeting of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee of the
County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13, and 14 of Orange County, California was
held on May 1, 1996, at the Districts'Administrative Office.
(1) ROLL CALL
The roll was taken and a quorum declared present, as follows:
Committee Directors Present: Staff Present:
Pat McGuigan, Chair Don McIntyre, General Manager
Victor Leipzig, Vice Chair Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager
John C. Cox Jr., Joint Chair Judy Wilson, Assistant General Manager
Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair Ed Hodges, Director of General Services Administration
Barry Denes David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Norman Z. Eckenrode Bob Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance
James M. Ferryman Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Mark Murphy Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications
Chris Norby Nancy Wheatley, Director of Technical Services
Tom Dawes, Engineer Planning Manager
Absent Mike Moore, Principal Environmental Specialist
Sam Mowbray, Lab Manager
Sal Sapien Angela Holden, Committee Secretary
Others Present:
Mary Clyburn Lee, John Carollo Engineers
Minutes of Operations, Maintenance and
Technical Services Committee Meeting
Page 2
May 1, 1996
(2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments received.
(4) REPORTS OF COMMITTEE CHAIR, GENERAL MANAGER.ASSISTANT GENERAL
MANAGER. DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE, DIRECTOR OF
TECHNICAL SERVICES,AND GENERAL COUNEL
(a) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
Director Pat McGuigan introduced Angie Holden as the new Committee Secretary and
expressed appreciation of the work done by Clarice Marcin.
(b) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
We had a meeting with House Foods this morning discussing Excess Capacity Charges.
We believe we may be able to strike a deal with them that would encourage on-site
treatment using part of their ECC to pay for the facility. This would be a pilot project and
our experience would contribute to the Strategic Plan Study. Nancy Wheatley will
discuss further.
(e) REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER
No report was given by either AGM.
(d) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS
Bob Ooten brought to the Committee's attention that the ENVEST Feasibility Study
Energy Conservation Report from So Ca Edison should be brought for review next
month. This is the energy conservation measures.
The Operations and Maintenance Departments are now combined under Bob Ooten.
(e) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF MAINTENANCE
Ed Hodges announced that this is the last meeting he will be spear-heading the OMTS
Committee since he now will be working in the General Services Administration. He is
now passing the baton to Nancy Wheatley. Ed expressed his pleasure in working on the
OMTS Committee and will be bringing items to this committee in the future. Two other
items were addressed:
1. Hopefully, next month he will be bringing an agreement with COP
Minutes of Operations, Maintenance and
Technical Services Committee Meeting
Page 3
May 1, 1996
Communications regarding placing antennas on a building at Plant No. 2. We are
negotiating a fee they will pay us for using our roof.
2. Within the next month or two will be bringing another proposal for additional funds
to get some federal, state and local monies to make CNG vehicles available to
trucking firms, cities and wastehaulers. We are working out a net zero in cost
with national exposure.
(f) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES
Nancy Wheatley had three items to report on:
1. House Foods-There was a meeting May 1, 1996 with Rick Hertel. We discussed
cost associated with BOD into our system. They will spend $100,000 a year just
in sewer use charges to pay for solids and BOD,that doesn't include the flow.
We discussed with Mr. Hertel ways they could do pretreatment. We did explain to
them that their annual capital fee would be no more than the cost calculated using
the present method amortized over ten years, but if they wanted to propose a
project whereas we would do a pilot program on pretreatment for BOD then if
they paid us a sum upfront we would invest that in the pilot program and as
partners we would put together a pretreatment program for them. If we receive a
favorable response, we will come back to this committee and then to the Board.
2. Bay Bridge Spill -As recorded that was a violation. The notice of an
administrative complaint will be filed soon. The amount of penalty against us is
reported unofficially to be $50,000. This is a low fine. This is reasonable. We
have not seen the complaint and we will report to you on it. As soon as we know
when it will be in the Register, we will let you know. Ed Hodges answered
questions regarding the liability issue. Other liabilities would not affect our
liability. Director Pat McGuigan requests that the liability issue be put on the
agenda calendar in the future.
3. Orange County Fair-Technical Services is taking responsibility for organizing the
booth with the assistance of the Communications Division.
(9) REPORT FROM GENERAL COUNSEL
No report was given.
(6) APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF APRIL 3. 1996 MEETING
Correction to Item#9, Director Norman Z. Eckenrode drew the Committee's attention
to the letter from a citizen in Newport Beach regarding flow of treated effluent from IRWD
into the Newport Bay. The rest of the minutes of the April 3, 1996 Operations,
Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Meeting were moved, seconded and
carried as approved as written.
Minutes of Operations, Maintenance and
Technical Services Committee Meeting
Page 4
May 1, 1996 -
(6) STATE OF THE DEPARTMENTS
Nancy J. Wheatley gave a presentation on the Technical Services Department
discussing the reorganization of divisions, department goals, staffing (past and
proposed), gallonage charge and budget. She also gave a brief overview of each
division. Copies of the slides were provided as handouts.
(7) NEW BUSINESS
PDC96-17: Consideration of motion to Recommend Approval of the Requested
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund for Fiscal Year 1996-97.
Dave Ludwin and Gary Streed gave a presentation discussing current budget, proposed
budget, status of projects that are ongoing, assessed the needs of Operations and
Maintenance and the Master Plan with consideration of the current Flows, current needs
and plans. The requested CORF budget totals $44,895,000, an increase of 34%from
last year's request of$33,530,000. Eighty-five percent of the requested budget is for
construction, seven percent for design and eight percent for planning and research. The
categories of requested funds include: improved treatment (48%), rehabilitation (26%),
support facilities and systems (21%) and added capacity (5%). Each project and budget
cost was discussed. Handouts were provided. Last year's prioritized list of projects was
considered and is reflected in this budget.
(8) OLD BUSINESS
OMTS96-021: Quarterly Report on the Districts' Occupational Injury and
Near-Miss Accident Rates.
Report was accepted without discussion.
OMTS95-033b: Consideration of one-year extension of Environmental
Monitoring Professional Services Contract for Districts' 120-
inch Ocean Outfall, Specification No. P-156R, to Science
Applications International Corporation to February 28, 1998
for an additional cost not to exceed $1,474,098.
Nancy gave the presentation. Discussion and explanation followed regarding how the
contract year is done. Sampling is done from July to July, then a writing-up and
statistical analysis period follows. There is an overlap.
Moved, seconded and carried to approve staffs recommendation.
Minutes of Operations, Maintenance and
Technical Services Committee Meeting
Page 5
May 1, 1996
OMTS95-041d: Consideration of motion to authorize staff to enter into a
Three-party Billing Agreement with the Southern California
Gas Company (SoCalGas) for the billing process of the
Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) Station.
Ed Hodges gave the presentation. This is the last (fourth installment) piece before we
start generating income. We have worked out an agreement that we will receive $.20 per
transaction.
Moved, seconded and carried to approve staffs recommendation.
OMTS95-020: Closing report on the implementation of the 38
recommendations made as part of the Ernst and Young audit
of the Operations and Maintenance Departments.
Bob Ooten gave the presentation. After discussion, it was decided that staff will bring to
the June OMITS Committee meeting a synapsis on all the items.
(9) NEW BUSINESS
OMTS96-009: EMA Competitiveness Assessment Report Summary of
Operations and Maintenance Department.
Bob Ooten gave the presentation. Recommendations are being considered and
incorporated. We are looking at ourselves competitively with private organization rather
than public agencies. These are substantial changes. Workplans will be guided by this.
A handout of the slide presentation was provided.
OMTS96-010: Overview of the new General Services Administration
Department(GSA).
Ed Hodges gave a brief presentation of the new department. There was discussion of
automation and revenues.
(10) CLOSED SESSION
The Chair declared there were no items for closed session.
(11) OTHER BUSINESS, IF ANY
Reminder of Saturday, May 4, Board Strategic Planning Workshop.
Minutes of Operations, Maintenance and
Technical Services Committee Meeting
Page 6
May 1, 1996
(12) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A
SUBSEQUENT MEETING
- RE: OMTS95-020 above: Staff will bring to the June OMTS Committee meeting a
synopsis on all the items.
- Bay Bridge Spill Liability Issue: Status to be discussed at a later date.
(13) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA
FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT
(14) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING DATES AND ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED
AT THOSE MEETINGS.
(15) ADJOURNMENT
The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:50 p.m.
Angel olden
Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services
Committee Secretary
J:\WPW WNGEM0WSNIA JN=S589
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
MAY 22, 1996
Agenda Item (13) (C): OMTS95-033b Consideration of one-year
extension of Environmental Monitoring
Professional Services Contract for Districts'
120-inch Ocean Outfall,Specification No. P-156R, to Science Applications International
Corporation to February 28, 1998 for an additional cost not to exceed $1,474,098.
Summary
The Ocean Monitoring Program (OMP) associated with the 301(h)-modified NPDES permit has
been conducted through consultant contracts since its inception in 1985. In June 1994,
Amendment 11 to Science Applications International Corporation's (SAIC) 1985 ocean
monitoring services contract (Specification No. S-032) was approved, extending the
performance period to February 1996. Concurrent with the approval of this extension, the
Boards of Directors directed staff to seek competitive proposals for the Year 11 contracted
ocean monitoring work. This process was initiated in November 1994, and staff received two
responses to the request for proposals. Upon staff recommendation and the Boards' approval,
SAIC was awarded a new contract for an amount not to exceed $1,486,463 (Specification
No. P-156R). Included in this approval was the option of up to two additional one-year contract
extensions based upon acceptable completion of work by SAIC and the status of issuance of a
new NPDES permit.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends exercising the option of the first one-year extension to SAIC's
Environmental Monitoring Professional Services Contract for the Districts' 120-inch Ocean
Outfall (Specification No. P-156R), extending the performance period to February 28, 1998,
for an additional amount not to exceed $1,474,098.
OMTS Committee Recommendation
The OMTS Committee concurs with the recommendation of staff.
GR:mm
J:\W P\3550\OMTS\95-03313.BRD
h
May 1, 1996
STAFF REPORT
OMTS95-033b: Consideration of one-year extension of Environmental Monitoring
Professional Services Contract for Districts' 120-inch Ocean
Outfall, Specification No. P456R, to Science Applications
International Corporation to February 28, 1998 for an additional
cost not to exceed $1,474,098.
Background
In June 1994, upon the approval of Amendment 11 of Science Applications International
Corporation's (SAIC) 1985 contract for Year 10 ocean monitoring services, the Boards of
Directors directed staff to seek competitive proposals for Year 11 (July 1995 to
February 1997) of the program. This process was initiated in November 1994 and staff
received two responses to our request for proposals. Upon evaluation and approval of
the Boards, SAIC was awarded a contract for an amount not to exceed $1,486,463 with
an option for up to two additional one-year renewals based upon acceptable completion
and the status of issuance of a new NPDES permit.
Year 11 Ocean Monitoring Program
SAIC and its subcontractors have provided excellent service for the Year 11 ocean
monitoring program. To date, they have met all completion goals for the samples
collected from July 1995 to April 1996. SAIC has been proactive in responding to
problems that arose during Year 11. One example is the loss of the commercial
chemistry laboratory (due to bankruptcy) half way through sampling period. SAIC was
able to identify and obtain a qualified laboratory that could run the specialized 301(h)
chemistry methodologies within a matter of weeks. In addition, SAIC has shown a
continued ability to respond to and accommodate Districts' needs during this contract
period. For example, SAIC and its primary subcontractor, MEC Analytical Systems, have
allowed Districts' personnel to obtain additional field samples during the normal sampling
events. In short, SAIC continues to provide competent ocean monitoring services to the
Districts.
CSOOC 0 P.O. Box 8127 0 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 • (714)962-2411
OMTS95-033b
Page 2 of 3
May 1, 1996
Year 12 Contract
Staff has successfully worked with SAIC to provide a contract price that represents a zero
increase from the previous contract period. Reductions in the scope of work has resulted
in a minor decrease of$12,356. Table 1 compares Year 12's proposed costs with
Year 11's actual costs.
Table 1. Comparison between SAIC Year 12 proposed costs and Year 11 actual costs,
by program element.
Program Element Year11 Year 12 Change
Offshore Water Quality $ 15,676 $ 15,747 $ 71
Benthic Monitoring $ 823,508 $ 803,206 $ (20,302)
Trawl Monitoring $ 153,258 $ 160,447 $ 7,189
Rig Fish Monitoring $ 62.201 $ 64,039 $ 1,838
Data Summary and Interpretation $ 295,774 $ 318,959 U23,",5185
Liaison and Program Review Meetings $ 70,760 $ 78,277 Additional Services $ 65,286 $ 33,423 Total $ 1,486,463 $ 1,474,098
Contractual Flexibility
The Districts is still waiting for EPA's decision on the renewal of our 301(h) waiver.
However, we are required to carry out the monitoring program as contained in the existing
NPDES Permit. Staff is continuing to evaluate better means of carrying out the
monitoring program. One result is the addition of flexibility in SAIC's contract language
that: (1) recognizes a new monitoring program may be required during the contract
period, and (2) that the Districts may, at its discretion, take on portions of the monitoring
program. In the first case, the Districts would negotiate with SAIC to alter the contractual
OMTS95-033b
Page 3 of 3
May 1, 1996
scope-of-work within the existing contract price, renegotiate a new price and/or re-bid the
new program. In the second case, although this is a fixed-price contract, any contractual
cost savings realized by the Districts carrying out certain program elements would be
deducted from the original contract amount.
Staff Recommendation
The requirement to continue with our existing NPDES permit monitoring program, and the
fact that SAIC has provided excellent service leads staff to decide that it is in the best
interests of the Districts to extend SAIC's contract. Staff recommends extending the
Environmental Monitoring Professional Services Contract for the Districts' 120-inch
Ocean Outfall (Specification No. P-156R) to SAIC for a one-year period to
February 28, 1998, for an additional amount not to exceed $1,474,098.
GR m=
JAW P13550\OMTS%95-033B.BRD
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
May 7, 1996
phone:
(714)9522411
Boards of Directors
meting addreae: County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
ha�ta,rV.11 ylCA 10844 Ellis Avenue
92726.8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708-7081
street address:
FoBA4enI�V w c4 SUBJECT: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Amendment No. 1 to
92708-7018 Agreement with Science Applications International Corporation
(SAIC)for the Ocean Monitoring Program Contract Services
for Districts' 120-inch Ocean Outfall, Specification No. P-156R
Member
Agencies
• In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional
cwa, engineering and architectural services, the Operations, Maintenance and
Anaheim Technical Services Committee (OMTS) has negotiated the following fee
Brad with Science Applications International Corporation to perform services for
Buena PerkCydr. the Ocean Monitoring Program Contract Services for Districts' 120-inch
Pourneon Valley Ocean Outfall, Specification No. P-156R in conformance with the
Fullerton
Hunt;ngmn Beach requirements of the United Stales Environmental Protection Agency. This
Irwou amendment modifies the original contract period (July 1, 1995 to February
La Habra La Palma 28 1997) and extends it to February 28, 1998. As a part of this extension
Las Alamitos SAIC will prepare equipment, conduct field surveys, Perform data analysis
Newport Beach
Orange and interpretations, report results and recommendations as summarized in
Phuohnud Table 1 for a net additional amount not to exceed $1,474,098 (Table 2).
Santa Ana
Beat Beath Total compensation for this package will not exceed $2,960.561.
Stanton
Co"
vlta Par* Table 1. Task Summary for SAIC Ocean Monitoring Contract (Amendment No. 1)
Yorbe Linde
County of Orange
Task Date(s)
aanhary Districts Year 11 and 12 Meetings/Liaison (Task F) July 1995 to January 1998
Cadre Mese
Carden Bore Report Task E 1996
Year 12 QAPP Re
M;ewev oty P ( ) July
Water District. Year 12 Field Sampling (Tasks A-D and G) July 1996 to April 1997
Imne Ranch Year 12 Analytical Work (Task A-D and G) July 1996 to June 1997
Year 11 Data Analysis, Interpretation and July 1996 to January 1997
Report Writing Task E
A Public Wastewater and Environmental Managemont Agency Committed to Pretecnng the Enwronment Since 1954
r
Boards of Directors
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Page 2 of 3
May 7, 1996
Table 1 (continued). Task Summary for SAIC Ocean Monitoring Contract
(Amendment No. 1)
Task Date(s)
Year 11 QA Report (Task E) October 1996
Year 11 Annual Report (Task E) January 1997
Year 12 Data Analysis, Interpretation and July 1997 to January 1998
Report Writing (Task E)
Year 12 QA Report (Task E) October 1997
Year 12 Annual Report Task E January 1998
Table 2. Cost Summary for SAIC Ocean Monitoring Contract (Amendment No. 1)
Basic Program Tasks (Labor& Other
Direct Costs for Tasks A-F) $1,343,604
Profit (Basic Program Tasks A-F) $97,071
Quality Assurance/Quality Control
Analysis (Task G) $31,234
Profit (Quality Assurance/Quality Control
Analysis Task G) $2,189
Amendment No. 1 Amount $1,474,098
Original Contract Amount $1,486,463
Total Contract Cost $2,960,561
Boards of Directors
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Page 3 of 3
May 7, 1996
The OMTS Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as
reasonable for the services to be performed and that the said fee will not
result in excessive profits for the contractor.
/s/Director McGuigan /s/Director Leipzig
Director McGuigan, Chair Director Leipzig, Vice Chair
OMTS Committee OMTS Committee
/s/Nancy J. Wheatley
Nancy J. Wheatley
Director of Technical Services
OMTS Committee
NJW:GR:mcm
JAW M550W MTSW501901TR
y
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
MAY 22, 1996
Agenda Item (13)(d): OMTS95-041d consideration of motion to
approving a Billing Agreement with Southern
California Gas Company (SoCalGas) as Districts' agent to facilitate billing for
amounts due to Districts for compressed natural gas dispensed from Districts'
refueling station, at a cost of$.20 per transaction, cancelable upon ten days
written notice.
Summary
Attached for your guidance and information is a copy of the proposed Three-party billing
agreement between the Districts and SoCalGas. When fully executed, it will allow
SoCalGas to bill anyone who uses our compressed natural gas facility at a cost of$0.20
per transaction.
As part of the agreement, SoCalGas will pay all commodity costs, transportation costs
and taxes and issue a net check to the Districts on a regular basis. This agreement
gives us the ability to charge different rates to different customers as we see fit. (Please
see attached Agreement.)
Budoetary Impact
None.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the Billing Agreement with SoCalGas.
OMTS Committee Recommendation
The OMTS Committee recommends approval of the Billing Agreement with SoCalGas.
For further information contact Ed Hodges (714) 962-2411, ext. 3005.
J:=POG WWG9 AV965.130
BILLING AGREEMENT
This BILLING AGREEIv=("Agreement") is entered into as of the_day of
1996 by and between Couny Sanitation Districts of Orange County("CSDOC"), a public agency as
owner/operator of one or more natural gas vehicle refueling stations accessible to the general public
("NGV Station(s)") and Southern California Gas Company, a California corporation("SoCalGas"), as
CSDOC's agent,to facilitate billing for amounts due to CSDOC for compressed natural gas dispensed
from the NGV Station.
CSDOC and SOCaIGas agree:
I. Aeencv. During the term of this Agreement CSDOC designates SoCa1Gas as
its non-exclusive agent to bill and receive payment for natural gas dispensed from the NGV
Station(s). SoCalGas shall,in good faith, endeavor(i)to bill CSDOC's customers for gas
purchased by them from the NGV Station(s) using SoCalGas' sponsored fueling cud,together
with certain taxes due thereon as specified in paragraph 4; (u)to credit or remit all funds so
received, less authorized deductions,to CSDOC in accordance with paragraph 4; (iu)to make
payment to the appropriate federal and state taxing agencies of the taxes so collected on
CSDOC's behalf and(iv)to conduct such further billing and collection efforts as SoCalGas
and CSDOC shall mutually agree upon.
2. Prices. CSDOC shall be solely responsible for determining the prices charged
from time to time for compressed natural gas dispensed from the NGV Station(s),and for
determining the amounts to be collected for all taxes, surcharges and other associated fees
payable by its customers. CSDOC may change such charges as of the first of any month,but
no more frequently than monthly. CSDOC shall notify SOCaIGw of such charges and of
modifications therein no later than ten(10) days prior to the beginning of the month in which
such price changes are to become effective.
3. Charge. Currently SoCalCas' administrators charge for processing and billing
on CSDOC's behalf is $0.20(twenty cents)per transaction. SoCalGas may increase or
ti
decrease the amount of such processing charge upon ten(10)days written notice to CSDOC,
provided that CSDOC may cancel this Agreement with respect to future transactions in
accordance with paragraph 5, should the change be unacceptable. As used herein"transaction"
means each reading of CSDOC's customer's card for fuel purchases from CSDOC's publicly
accessible NGV Station, regardless of the volume purchased. Due to certain limitations in its
billing system, SoCalCras' invoice to CSDOC will not provide the details of the administrative
fee provided for in paragraph 3,nor the details of the credit from SoCalGas' billings on
CSDOC's behalf under this Agreement. At CSDOC's reques4 a transaction summary report
from the provider of the billing card system(currently E. I Ward) will be provided by
SoCalGas.
4. Payments.
4.1 At the end of each billing period,SoCalGas shall credit CSDOC with
charges received and billed on behalf of CSDOC pursuant to this Agreement. Solely as an
accommodation to CSDOC, SOCalCras will remit to the appropriate taxing agencies all
amounts billed and collected for state use fuel tax and federal vehicle fuel tax on behalf of
CSDOC. SOCaIGas is authorized to deduct from its credits to CSDOC, without notice or
demand, (n all administrative charges, (u) all amounts due from CSDOC to SOCalGas for gas
sold to or transported for CSDOC or other utility services,and(iii)all taxes received by
SOCaIGas under this Agreement and paid to taxing authorities on behalf of CSDOC and its
customers. Payments received from CSDOC's customers may be applied by SoCalGas
(without any requirement to do so)to satisfy obligations in the following order of priority:
(a) federal fuel taxes;
(b) state fuel use taxes;
(c) amounts due from the customer to SoCalGas(including interest and penalties)
for natural gas vehicle fuel provided at SoCalCms owned locations; and
(d) amounts due from CSDOC to SoCalCm(including interest and penalties)for
gas service.
2
d
The balance shall be credited to CSDOC. In the event that customer has paid SoCalGas for
fuel purchased from other non-utility providers,the amount credited CSDOC shall not exceed
its pro-rats share of the amounts so collected.
4.2 For each billing period, SoCalGas is permitted to estimate the credit due
CSDOC under this Agreement on the basis of billings to CSDOC's customers. As of the end
of each calendar quarter, SoCalGas shall reconcile such estimated credits with the total
amounts actually paid by such customers during such quarter and shall famish CSDOC a
summary statement showing any additional amounts due to,or from, CSDOC. Over-
collections not previously credited to CSDOC shall be deducted from future invoices. Under-
collections not previously paid by CSDOC shall be paid by CSDOC upon invoicing. Invoices
shall be deemed delivered when properly addressed to the address specified by the party and
deposited in the United States Mail,postage prepaid.
4.3 SoCalGas reserves the right to deactivate any end-user's fueling card for
non-payment, and to require any end-user to post a deposit to establish or re-establish credit
4.4 All charges and credits are subject to audit and adjustment within three(3)
years of the date made.
5. Term. This Agreement may be canceled by either parry, with or without cause,
at the end of any month upon written notice delivered by the canceling party to the other no
later than ten(10) days prior to the end of the month, to be effective upon the fast day of the
following month. Cancellation shall not affect billing and processing for transactions occurring,
or other rights or obligations arising under this Agreement prior to the effective date of
cancellation.
6. Operations CSDOC shall remain solely responsible for the operations of its
NGV Station, including(but not limited to) compliance with all safety, regulatory,tax(other
than taxes which SoCalGas actually collects and pays pursuant to paragraph 4.1) and other
laws and regulations applicable thereto;meter calibration;service and maintenance of the NGV
Station; and maintenance of public liability insurance or self-insurance with coverage adequate
3
to cover the risks associated therewith. Nothing herein shall be construed as creating a
partnership,joint venture, co-owner relationship or other form of shared responsibility for the
NGV Station or its operation or maintenance.
7. Assignment. CSDOC shall not assign or transfer its interest in,nor any of its
rights under this Agreement without SOCaIGas' written consent,not to be unreasonably
withheld
8. Notice. Notices provided for under this Agreement may be served
electronically,through private courier or by the United States Mail to the address specified by
each party beneath its signature,or to such other address as such party shall specify by written
notice to the other. Service shall be complete upon actual receipt,or,with respect to delivery
by United States Mail, five days after the date the notice is mailed,postage prepaid
9. Remdatory Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Section X.B of General Order 96A issued
by the California Public Utilities Commission("CPUC"),this Agreement shall be Sled with the
CPUC. To the extent required by General Order 96A,this Agreement shall at all times be
subject to such changes or modifications by the CPUC as said Commission may,from time to
time, direct in the exercise of its jurisdiction. Except as maybe expressly provided herein, the
tariffs and rules of SoCalGas, as approved by the CPUC,shall govern to the extent they are
applicable to utility services provided CSDOC by SoCalGas.
10. Miscellaneous.
10.1 Conformity to Law. The interpretation and performance of this
Agreement shall be in accordance with the laws of the State of California,and the orders,Hiles
and regulations of the CPUC, in effect form time to time.
10.2 Entire Agreement: Amendments. This Agreement contains the complete
understanding of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior
discussions, agreements and representations(whether oral or written). Except as required to
conform with California law and the orders, rules and regulations of the CPUC,no amendment
or modification shall be made to this Agreement except by an instrument in writing executed
4
f
a
by all parties, and no amendment or modification shall be made by course of performance,
course of dealing or usage of trade.
10.3 Waiver. No waiver by any party of one or more defaults under this
Agreement shall be construed as a waiver of any other default or defaults,whether of a like or
different character.
10.4 Limitation of Liability. No party under this Agreement shall be assessed
any special punitive, consequential, incidental or indirect damages, whether in contract or tort,
for any actions or inactions arising from or related to this Agreement
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date
first above set forth.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. I OF
ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA,for itself and on
behalf of County Sanitation District Nos. 2,3, 5, 6, 7,
11, 13 and 14 of Orange County California
By:
Chair,Board of Directors
By:
Secretary,Board of Directors
Approved as to Form:
Thomas L. Woodruf
District Councel
By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY,
a corporation
By:
Title:
5
t County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County,California
.' P.O.Box 8127.108"Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127
Telephone: (714)962-2411
DRAFT
MINUTES OF PLANNING, DESIGN AND
CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE
THURSDAY, MAY 2. 1996, at 5:30 p.m.
A regular meeting of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee of the County Sanitation
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13, and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Thursday,
May 2, 1996, at the Districts'Administrative Office.
(1) ROLL CALL
The roll was taken and a quorum declared present, as follows:
Planning, Design and
Construction Committee: Staff Present:
Present: Blake P. Anderson, Assistant General
Manager
John Collins, Chair David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
John C. Cox, Jr. Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Shirley Dettloff Bob Dolan, Director of Operations
Don Griffin Michelle Tuchman, Dir. of Communications
Barry Hammond Tom Dawes, Planning Manager
Margie Rice Paul Mitchell, Design Manager
Sheldon Singer
Peer Swan
Charles Sylvia Others Present:
Absent Mary Lee, Carollo Engineers
Walter K. Bowman
t
Minutes of Planning, Design and ,
Construction Committee Meeting
Page 2
May 2, 1996
(2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments received.
(4) APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF APRIL 4. 1996 MEETING
The minutes of the April 4, 1996 Planning, Design and Construction Committee Meeting
were approved as written.
(5) REPORTS OF COMMITTEE CHAIR GENERAL MANAGER ASSISTANT GENERAL
MANAGER. DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING AND GENERAL COUNSEL
(a) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
No report was given.
(b) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
No report was given.
(c) REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER
There was a brief discussion regarding the landfill issues.
(d) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING
Please refer to Section (6)(a).
(a) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
No report was given.
(6) STAFF OVERVIEW OF DISTRICTS' PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION
ACTIVITIES
(a) Status Report on Jobs within the Plants and the Districts by the Director of
Engineering
The Director of Engineering advised that the new Agenda Calendar will now be
included in the PDC Agenda packages. He explained that many items are subject
to change because they pertain to construction.
• Minutes of Planning, Design and
Construction Committee Meeting
Page 3
May 2, 1996
The Director of Engineering gave an updated report on Change Order No. 1 to
Contract 7-22, Lemon Heights Replacement Project, regarding the slurry backfill,
as requested by Director Hammond at the April 4, 1996 PDC Committee Meeting.
Our specifications called for select material and not slurry backfill. The EMA
inspector who was on the job required us to slurry backfill manholes and lateral
pipelines that crossed traffic lanes in the streets in an effort to facilitate the
construction and get traffic back to normal. In the future, we can provide a bid
item in the specification for the contractor. Although we cannot anticipate where
the extra work items will be, we can anticipate the need for them, and issue a
change order if it does occur.
The Director of Engineering gave an update on the Slater Avenue Pump Station
construction. As mentioned at last month's meeting, we have given the contractor
a plan change to allow him to do the work in the street and to get the traffic lanes
open to full traffic as soon as possible. We are still working with the contractor to
finalize the schedule and associated costs.
The Districts are trying to obtain a Coastal Permit through the City of Huntington
Beach regarding Job No. J-34, which is the Replacement of the Surge Tower at
Plant No. 2. We obtained a Coastal Permit in January 1996, but it was appealed
by one of the City Council members relative to aesthetic issues regarding the view
of the surge tower from Pacific Coast Highway. We subsequently appealed some
of the issues and received some new conditions from the Planning Commission
within the permit. We again appealed the conditions to the Huntington Beach City
Council. We will be meeting with Councilman Tom Harmon, who is the appellate
for the City of Huntington Beach, and the Planning Department staff tomorrow
morning to try to resolve the issues relative to landscaping so we can move
forward with the project. In an effort to accommodate the City, we moved forward
a landscaping project that we anticipated building two years from now, which will
help address some of the aesthetic issues relative to the surge tower. We hope
that by moving that project forward and getting the City Involved in our Strategic
Plan relative to aesthetic issues, we can come to a resolution.
The Director of Engineering reported on the Space Utilization Study. There was a
meeting with the consultant this afternoon to discuss the project. In consideration
of the changing environment within the organization and the downward trend in
staffing, there was discussion regarding changes in the way we are viewing the
Space Study. We will be meeting again in one week to discuss the change and
the direction of the study and scope, and will then meet with the Ad Hoc
Committee Re Space Utilization Study to make sure everyone is in agreement.
Aiming towards closure, we are trying to decide what the space needs are of the
existing staff, and to establish a philosophy for future space planning.
It was discussed and agreed upon that an Ad Hoc Committee be scheduled to
discuss options of the Space Utilization Study further.
Minutes of Planning, Design and
Construction Committee Meeting
Page 4
May 2, 1996
(8) ACTIONS RE PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTS
(a) Monthly Change Order Report by Director of Engineering on Change Orders
approved by the General Manager, Planning, Design and Construction
Committee, and Joint Boards.
None to report.
(9) ADDENDA TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS
None to report.
(10) NEW PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS
None to report.
(11) CONSIDERATION OF NEW AND MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS
PDC96-17: Consideration of motion to recommend approval of the requested
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund for Fiscal Year 1996-97.
The Director of Engineering and the Director of Finance presented the draft Capital
Outlay Revolving Fund (CORF) budget for Fiscal Year 1996-97. The requested CORF
budget totals $44,895,000, an increase of 34%from last years request of$33,530,000.
Eighty-five percent(85%)of the requested budget is for construction, seven percent (7%)
is for design, and eight percent(8%) for planning and research. The categories of
requested funds include: improved treatment(48%), rehabilitation (26%), support
facilities and systems (21%), and added capacity (5%).
The Directors reviewed the proposed budget and requested additional information
regarding previous budget approvals for cost tracking purposes. A new schedule with
project cost comparison will be included in the submittal for the Boards of Directors
Meeting.
It was moved, seconded, and carried to recommend approval of this item.
PDC96-18: Consideration of recommendation authorizing issuance of purchase
order to ADS Environmental Services, Inc. for an amount not to
exceed $131,300 for flow monitoring services to be used in the
preparation of our Strategic Plan.
The Director of Engineering explained that this project is part of the work
needed to do for the Strategic Plan, in particular, the work that CDM is
doing relative to the hydraulic analysis of the collection system. What is
proposed is a two-phase sewer monitoring program to gather dry weather
and wet weather flow data. The data will be used by the consultant in
projecting sewage generation rates and flows, and to consider wet
v
Minutes of Planning, Design and
Construction Committee Meeting
Page 5
May 2, 1996
weather issues relative to sewer in-flow and infiltration. We are proposing
to monitor 30 different stations throughout the Districts for 14 days during
this first dry weather phase of the work, and then follow-up next winter
during the wet weather for 30 days to establish some wet weather flow
patterns.
After some discussion, it was moved, seconded, and carried to
recommend approval of this item.
(12) CLOSED SESSION
The Chair determined that there was no need for a closed session.
(13) OTHER BUSINESS, IF ANY
None.
(14) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A
SUBSEQUENT MEETING
It was suggested that with Daylight Savings Time now in effect, it might be a good time to
take advantage of the light by taking a tour of some of the projects under construction. It
was discussed that August may be a good month to conduct these tours.
(15) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA
FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT
There were no matters discussed.
(16) NEXT MEETING
(a) Joint Boards of Directors Meeting -- Wednesday, May 22, 1996, at 7:30 p.m.
(b) Ad Hoc Committed Re Space Utilization Study, Wednesday, May 29, 1996, at
5:30 p.m.
(b) Planning, Design and Construction Committee Meeting -- Thursday,
June 6, 1996, at 5:30 p.m.
(c) Joint Boards of Directors Meeting --Wednesday, June 26, 1996, at 7:30 p.m.
(17) OTHER ANNOUNCEMENTS. IF ANY
None.
1
Minutes of Planning, Design and
Construction Committee Meeting
Page 6
May 2, 1996
(18) ADJOURNMENT
The
/JChair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:45 p.m.
ate ,.emu
Gail A. Cain
Planning, Design and Construction
Committee Secretary
J:1WPDOCFDC%NNY M2%.WN
JOINT BOARDS OF DJRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
MAY 22, 1996
Agenda Item (14)(C): PDC96-18 Consideration of motion authorizing the
General Manager to issue a purchase order to
ADS Environmental Services, Inc. in an amount not
to exceed $131,300 for Dry Weather and Wet
Weather Flow Monitoring Services to be used in
the preparation of our Strategic Plan.
Summary
In March 1996, the Boards of Directors approved professional services agreements which
launched Phase I of our new Strategic Plan. One of the three projects included in our Phase I
planning is Management of Peak Hydraulic Discharges, Job No. J40-1, awarded to Camp
Dresser& McKee, Inc. (CDM). As part of the Management of Peak Hydraulic Discharge work,
our consultant will project wastewater flows expected over the planning period and propose
ways to reduce peak storm flows. In order to do that, our consultant has requested a two-
phased monitoring program, which includes gathering both dry weather and wet weather flow
data.
The dry weather flow data will be used to check flow generation rate data based on land use
categories and develop flow data necessary for a flow model. The wet weather flow will be
used to determine the contribution from storm in-flow and infiltration.
In order to do this work, our consultant, CDM, prepared a scope of work for the two-phased flow
monitoring program and solicited quotations from local, qualified firths for flow monitoring
services. Two firms considered by CDM to be qualified to do the work submitted proposals to
monitor 30 stations for 14 days for the first phase (dry weather) and 30 days for the second
phase (wet weather). The fans submitted the following proposals:
ADS Environmental Services $131,300
MGD Technologies, Inc. $149,565
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Planning, Design and Construction Committee recommend that the
Boards authorize the General Manager to issue a purchase order to ADS Environmental
Services in an amount not to exceed $131,300 for Dry Weather and Wet Weather Flow
Monitoring in accordance with the vendor's proposal dated April 19, 1996 and the scope of work
prepared by CDM.
PDC Committee Recommendation
The PDC Committee concurs with the recommendation of staff.
Jawr�wcaswwYe .roc
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County,CalHornia
P.O.Box 8127•10844 Ellis Avenue
_ Fountain Valley,CA 9272"127
Telephone: (714)962-2411
DRAFT
MINUTES OF FINANCE,
ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE
Wednesday. Mav 8. 1996. 5:30 P.M.
A meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee of the
County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County,
California was held on May 8, 1996 at 5:30 p.m., at the Districts' Administrative Offices.
(1) ROLL CALL
The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
Committee Directors Present: Staff Present:
Roger R. Stanton, Vice Chair Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager
John C. Cox, Jr., Joint Chair Blake P. Anderson, Assistant General Manager
Jan Debay Judith A. Wilson, Assistant General Manager
Burnie Dunlap Ed Hodges, Director of General Services Admin.
James Flora David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
John M. Gullixson Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Wally Lynn Mike Peterman, Director of Human Resources
Thomas Saltarelli Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications
William G. Steiner Steve Kozak, Financial Manager
Peer Swan Linda Eisman, Training Manager
Dawn McKinley, Sr. Human Resources Analyst
Committee Directors Absent: Mike White, Controller
Isiah Mitchell, Training Supervisor
George Brown, Chair Terri Josway, Safety & Emergency Response Mgr.
Other Directors Present: Others Present:
John Collins Tom Woodruff, General Counsel
(2) APPOINTMENT OF A CHAIRMAN PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
No comments were made.
Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee 9
Page 2
May 8, 1996
(4) REPORTS OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR. GENERAL MANAGER. ASSISTANT
GENERAL MANAGER($). DIRECTOR OF FINANCE/TREASURER. DIRECTOR
OF HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
AND GENERAL COUNSEL
(a) Report of the Committee Chair
The Committee Chair had no report.
(b) Report of the General Manager
Don McIntyre gave a brief verbal report and slide presentation on the
proposed upcoming 1996-97 Operating Budget. He noted that the
Steering Committee had an opportunity to review progress on the
proposed budget last month. Since then, staff has been able to bring the
budget down from the proposed 640 FTE to 624 total staffing for this
upcoming budget period. Costs per mgd are expected to remain at $555,
which is the same cost for mgd as expected for 1995-96. Don announced
that the proposed budget will be presented to the Committee at their June
12th meeting.
(c) Report of Assistant General Manager -Administration
The Assistant General Manager of Administration had no report.
Report of Assistant General Manager - Operations
The Assistant General Manager of Operations had no report.
(d) Report of the Director of Finance/Treasurer
The Director of Finance/Treasurers written report was contained in the
agenda package.
(e) Report of the Director of Human Resources
The Acting Director of Human Resources had no report.
(f) Report of the Director of General Services Administration
The Director of General Services Administration had no report.
(g) Report of General Counsel
General Counsel had no report.
Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee
Page 3
May 8, 1996
(5) APPROVAL OF MINUTES
It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the draft minutes of the
April 10, 1996, meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources
Committee.
(6) Consideration of PD&C96-17 - Consideration of motion to recommend
approval of the requested Capital Outlay Revolving Fund for Fiscal Year
1996-97.
David Ludwin handed out two booklets prepared for the Committee's review and
reported on the 1996-97 CORF budget. A slide presentation was given by David
Ludwin and Gary Streed. Mr. Ludwin reviewed the projects and noted that 85%
of the budget would go toward construction, 8% toward planning and research
and 7% toward design. Mr. Streed reviewed the costs to the individual Districts,
total capital requirements and how these requirements will be met this year
without an increase in sewer service fees. Total Capital Improvement Funding is
expected to be $44,895,000 this year, an increase of 34% from last year's
request.
Following discussion, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend
approval of the proposed Capital Outlay and Revolving Fund (CORF) budget .
(7) OLD BUSINESS
FAHR96-07 Consideration of motion to receive and file status report on
Legal Services Committee Activities relative to in-house
General Counsel Services.
Judy Wilson gave a brief report of the activities to date re the Steering
Committee's desire to review in-house General Counsel activities and the
formation of the AD Hoc Committee on Legal Services. Judy introduced Greg
Mathews who reported in more detail on these activities.
Based on various analyses such as cost of proposed in-house legal services,
quantitative vs. qualitative issues, staffing utilization, availability, reporting
relationships and financial impact, one Attorney, one Paralegal, and one Legal
Secretary would be required to operate an in-house office. Duties and
responsibilities would focus on the performance of general legal services
representing approximately 2,500 hours annually of legal workload. An in-house
General Counsel Office is estimated to save the Districts approximately $45,500
annually in offset contract legal fees.
Tom Woodruff advised that the possibility of an in-house counsel was looked at
one year ago with no changes made. Mr. Woodruff expressed no objection to an
in-house counsel as a cost-saving method for the Districts. Tom further advised
Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee
Page 4
May 8, 1996
he is currently working with Marc Dubois, the new Contracts and Purchasing
Manager, who filled the position on March 11, 1996. Tom stated that Marc is
already doing an excellent job.
Following discussion among the Directors, it was moved, seconded and duly
carried to receive and file this status report.
Director Gullixson indicated he would like this issue placed on the agenda for a
future meeting, and perhaps form an Ad Hoc Committee to review attorney
billings.
FAHR96-11 Consideration of motion to receive and file PIMCO's Second
Quarterly Performance Report. Investment Management
Program. for the period January 1. 1996 to March 31, 1996.
Steve Kozak summarized PIMCO's Second Quarterly Performance Report,
Investment Management Program, for the period January 1, 1996 to March 31,
1996, and Callan Associates' second quarterly performance review for the same
period. PIMCO is the Districts' contracted external money manager and Callan
Associates is the Districts' independent investment advisor. Mr. Kozak advised
that market fluctuations resulted in higher interest rates and a drop in the price of
securities during the last quarter. The capital gain and loss from the last two
quarters have offset one another. PIMCO is in compliance with the Districts'
Investment Program.
Mr. Kozak advised that there have been changes in the government code which
will be incorporated into the Districts' Investment Policy, and will be brought
before the Committee in July for their annual review. The Districts will be fully on-
line with Mellon Trust, the Districts' Custodial Bank, enabling us to receive "real
lime" information.
It was moved, seconded and duly carried to receive and file this report.
FAHR96-26 Consideration of motion to accept staffs recommendation
regarding future funding of Management Performance Review
Plan.
Dawn McKinley, Sr. Human Resources Analyst, provided a follow-up report and
slide presentation to her initial report to the FAHR Committee on April 10, 1996.
She indicated the FY96/97 merit fund will be distributed in July 1996 according to
the FY96197 Merit Bonus Guidelines.
5.0 percent of the payroll pool (totaling $569,415)was recommended to fund the
FY97/98 MPRP reviews in July 1997. Three (3.0%) percent of the pool was
proposed to be distributed as a non-base building merit bonus, and 2.0 percent,
or an amount equal to CPI, whichever is lower, was proposed to be distributed to
provide a base building market adjustment. The actual dollar amounts to be
Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee
Page 5
May 8, 1996
distributed are estimated to be $204,547, to be distributed to employees for
meritorious performance which is estimated to be 1.85 percent of the
management payroll. Some portion of equity issues will also be met with the
merit pool funds. Dawn indicated that this proposal is subject to "meet and
confer" with the professional and supervisory bargaining units. Their current
contract expires on January 31, 1997. Negotiations will be underway in fall of
1996. The approval of this item will ensure that a pool of money is established for
performance awards in July 1997 for continued implementation of a merit pay
program, and will provide Board support for a performance-based pay program.
After considerable discussion, it was moved, seconded and duly carried to
approve staff s recommendation with a 2% funding for the Bonus Pool rather than
3%. There was one nay vote.
The Committee requested this item be brought and included with other issues in
the meet and confer process.
(8) NEW BUSINESS
(Please Note: Though the following items were acted on in another sequence,
the minutes will reflect them in numerical order for tracking purposes.)
FAHR96-27 Consideration of motion to receive and file Treasurer's
Report for the month of March 1996.
The month ended March 1996 Performance Monitoring Reports for Liquid and
Long-term Operating Monies indicated that total investments amount to
$359,143,505. All Investment Policy requirements are being followed and met.
There was no discussion on this item. It was moved, seconded and duly carried
to approve and forward this report to the Joint Boards.
FAHR96-28 Consideration of motion to accept staffs recommendation re
adoption of new health benefit plan.
Mike Peterman, Acting Director of Human Resources, reported that staff reviews
the health benefit insurance plans on an annual basis to determine if the benefits
and costs are consistent with market survey information from other agencies,
cities and districts. It was concluded that the Northwestern National Life health
plan was significantly overpriced and claims payment experience was less than
satisfactory. The Districts' broker-of-record, Robert F. Driver Company, was
asked in January to obtain estimates for health, dental and vision insurance.
After employee informational meetings, MetraHealth was the clear front runner.
Delta Dental provided a quotation which would allow the Districts to convert its
self-insured plan to fully insured at a slightly higher rate of$1,000 per month.
Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee
Page 6
May 8, 1996
Staff also requested our broker to investigate vision insurance and is proposing to
offer vision coverage to all employees regardless of the plan they choose at a
cost of$99,324 annually. Net savings to the Districts after all of these changes
are estimated to be $688,687.
The Committee expressed dissatisfaction with Robert F. Driver's past
performance in obtaining competitive health benefit packages and noted that the
Districts have not been well served in this area of insurance.
Following discussion among the Directors, it was moved, seconded, and after a
hand vote, duly carried to approve staffs recommendation to accept the change
in the health benefit plan, but to withhold the vision insurance benefit to the
collective bargaining process. The changes are as follows:
Revision of Resolution 95-105 to reflect agreement with represented
employee units to substitute the Matra Health Point-of-Service plan for the
Northwestern National Life medical coverage; fund dependent medical
premiums at 80% and employee-only coverage at 100%; convert dental
insurance from self-funded to fully-insured through Delta Dental; and amend
the Memoranda of Understanding with the Districts' bargaining units, and
other plan documents accordingly, effective July 1, 1996.
FAHR96-29 Consideration of motion to consider alternatives for renewal
of All-Risk Property Insurance lincludina Fire. Flood and
Earthquake Coverage)for FY 1996-97.
Steve Kozak gave an overview of the Districts' current All-Risk Property
Insurance, including fire, flood and earthquake which expires at the end of June
1996, and presented two renewal options provided by the Districts' broker of
record, Robert F. Driver Company.
After discussion on this item, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried to
authorize staff to bind over our current coverage, and negotiate with Robert F.
Driver to reduce the cost of coverage, and report back next month.
The Committee further requested that staff provide information on Robert F.
Driver's commission structure and what commission they are requesting on each
of the insurances they provide us.
FAHR96-30 Consideration of a motion to renew Excess Workers'
Compensation Insurance for the period May 1996 to May
1999, with the California Municipal Excess Workers'
Compensation (CAMEX) Program.
Steve Kozak briefly reported that the Districts' Broker-of-Record, Robert F. Driver
Company, and staff reviewed Excess Workers' Compensation insurance
alternatives and learned that the current policy underwriter, American
International Group (AIG), has changed its underwriting philosophy and was
Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee
Page 7
May 8, 1996
proposing an approximate 35% increase in renewal rates. Driver considered
other insurance carriers and, following negotiations with five firms, secured
Continental Casualty Company (CNA)for the CAMEX program effective with the
May 1996 renewal. The renewal is for a term of three years with a rate
guarantee, but the policy is subject to a payroll audit. No additional premium is
due unless payroll is increased by more than 10%.
After brief discussion, it was moved, seconded and duly carried to renew Excess
Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability Insurance for the period May
1996 to May 1999 with the California Municipal Works' Compensation (CAMEX)
Program for a premium of$22,678, which could be adjusted based on a payroll
audit.
FAHR96-31 Consideration of responses to the Request for Proposals to
develop a General Liability Risk Management Program for the
Districts.
Steve Kozak reviewed the responses received from the Request for Proposals to
develop a General Liability Risk Management Program for the Districts effective
July 1, 1996. He further provided a summary comparison of the proposals
received from the Special District Risk Management Authority, the Califomia
Sanitation Risk Management Authority, and Robert F. Driver Company.
In response to questions, Gary Streed and Tom Woodruff advised that every year
since 1986 the Committee has evaluated purchasing this insurance, however,
premiums have consistently been very high. The rates quoted this year seem
very reasonable.
After discussion among the Committee members, it was moved, seconded and
duly carried to:
1) Select the proposal submitted by Robert F. Driver to secure Comprehensive
General Liability and Excess Liability insurance coverage for the Districts with
a Self Insured Retention of$100,000, and a premium cost of approximately
$118,750, and recommend approval to the Joint Boards of Directors with an
effective date of July 1, 1996; and
2) Directed staff to further investigate the issue of"Known Events Risk Transfer."
FAHR96-32 Consideration of motion to receive and file quarterly staff
Summary Report of Training and for the Quarter ended March
31, 1996.
Linda Eisman presented a brief Quarterly Staff Summary Report of Training for
the Quarter ended March 31, 1996. She also gave a brief slide presentation.
Linda indicated the Districts are in the process of centralizing and improving
Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee
Page 8
May 8, 1996
District-wide training by implementing a Districts' Training Plan which includes
required safety, technical and other training needs. She reviewed some of the
major projects underway such as safety training, certification programs and the
MPRP program.
It was moved, seconded and duly carried to receive and file this report.
FAHR96-33 Consideration of motion to approve payment of final billing
amounts for the Landfill Acquisition due diligence consultant
team.
Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager-Operations, reviewed the final billing
amounts for the consulting team who worked on the proposed acquisition of the
Orange County Solid Waste Management System. Payment of these invoices
would bring the total amount expended on consulting services for the landfill
acquisition project to approximately $401,737.59. Staff and General Counsel
efforts are estimated at an additional $100,000. The Board authorized $100,000
of the consulting work performed by Clements Environmental. Clements
performed additional work amounting to $69,945.28. No written agreements
were made for the work performed by the other two consultants.
Blake advised the Committee that the Districts is still waiting for a response from
the County regarding refunding our$100,000. The Districts may offer to provide
the reports prepared by these consultants to the County.
After discussion, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried to:
1. Approve the payment of$69,945.28 to Clements Environmental.
2. Form an Ad Hoc Committee comprised of Directors Swan, Gullixson and
Salterelli to review the billings of Price Waterhouse and Saybrook Capital
in more detail
3. Bring this item back to the FAHR Committee next month.
FAHR96-34 Consideration of motion to review and approve the Third
Quarter Report prepared by staff for the Period ended
March 31. 1996.
Mike White gave a brief review of the Third Quarter Report of financial and
operational expenditures for the period ended March 31, 1996. He advised that
65.74% or$35,747,000 of the 1995-96 net joint operating budget of$54,380,000
has been expended. In addition, the Districts are at only 71.70 % of the target
budget of$49,860,000.
After a brief discussion on this matter, it was moved, seconded and duly carried
to approve the Financial and Operational Report for the third quarter ended
March 31, 1996.
Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee
Page 9
May 8, 1996
The Committee complimented Mike White for the improved format and
information contained in the quarterly report.
(9) CLOSED SESSION
General Counsel reported to the Committee the need for a closed session, as
authorized by Government Code Section 54956.9 to discuss and consider the
item that is specified as Item (9)(b) on the published Agenda.
The Committee convened in Closed Session at 8:50 p.m. pursuant to
Government Code Section 54956.9.
At 9:15 p.m. the Committee reconvened in regular session. Confidential minutes
of the closed session held by the Finance, Administration and Human Resources
Committee have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code
Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book
of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings.
The Chair reported that an Ad Hoc Committee comprised of Directors Dunlap,
Gullixson and Salterelli had been formed to review the professional services
invoices from R. Craig Scott &Associates, and to report to the FAHR Committee
in June.
(10) OTHER BUSINESS, IF ANY
None.
(11) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A
SUBSEQUENT MEETING
No reports were requested.
(12) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE
AGENDA FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT
None.
(13) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING DATES AND ITEMS TO BE
DISCUSSED AT THOSE MEETINGS
The next Committee meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, June 12, 1996.
Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee
Page 10
May 8, 1996
(14) ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at approximately 9:20 p.m.
Lenora Crane
Finance, Administration and Human
Resources Committee Secretary
J:IW PDOCWINICRANEIFPC.MTOIFAHR.9%19N.MIMMFAHR5.96
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
MAY 22,1996
Agenda Item (15)(C): FAHR96-26 Consideration of motion approving the following
revisions to MPRP (Management Performance Review Plan)
Performance Inventive Values:
(1) Establish a Target Merit Pool Fund of 2.0% of payroll for implementation in July 1997, as a
non-base building bonus for performance that exceeds expectations or Is outstanding.
(2) Provide for market adjustment not to exceed 2.0%of payroll or CPI for Los Angeles-Anaheim-
Riverside,whichever Is lower.
Summary
On April 10, 1996,staff presented a report to the Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee that
Identified the improvements made to the Management Performance Review Program,discussed the competitive
position of the Districts'pay program,and defined the FY96/97 Target Merit Pool Fund of 5.0 percent as a non-
base building merit bonus for employees whose performance exceeds expectations or is considered outstanding.
This proposal is subject to'meet and confer"with the professional and supervisory bargaining units. Their
current contract expires on January 31, 1997. Negotiations will be underway in the fall of 1996. The purpose of
this action is to ensure that a pool of money is reserved for the continued implementation of a merit pay program
and that there is Board support for a performance-based pay program. It is important to secure this commitment
prior to the FY'96-07 since the performance based program presumes that the reward system will be in place for
the following fiscal year.
Staffs original recommendation for the FY97/98 MPRP fund was for a 3%non-base building merit bonus pool
and a base-building market adjustment not to exceed 2%. After Committee discussion,the motion was revised
to recommend a maximum 2%base-building adjustment and lower the non-base building merit pool from 3%to
2%. It was also discussed by the Committee that the total salary increase pool is subject to the"meet and
confer"process.
Recommendation
1. Staff recommends that a 4.0 percent of payroll pool(totaling$455,532)be established to fund the FY97/98
MPRP. Two(2.0) percent of the pool would be distributed as a non-base building merit bonus and 2.0
percent,or an amount equal to CPI,whichever is lower,would be distributed to provide a base building
market adjustment.
a) Establish a FY97/98 Target Merit Pool Fund of 2.0 percent of payroll(totaling$227,766)to be
distributed as a non-base building bonus in July of 1997 to employees whose performance exceeds
expectations or is considered outstanding. The fund would be distributed according to the FY 97198 Merit
Bonus Guidelines.
b) Provide for a market adjustment not to exceed 2.0 percent of payroll(totaling$227,766)or CPI for Los
Angeles-Anaheim-Riverside, all urban consumers,whichever Is lower. The increase would be distributed
equally to all employees who at least meet expectations to keep the employees'salaries at market. This
increase amount is based on CPI and other market conditions,including comparison of increases at other
cities and agencies.
2. Do not move FY97/98 pay ranges per the results of the salary survey discussed earlier.
If copies of the staff report or further information is requested,contact Mike Peterman.
JAW PDOCtaS1AG96WY9615.15C
April 25, 1996 ...
STAFF REPORT
FAHR 96-26: Future Funding of Management Performance Review Program
Bac g or and
On April 10, 1996,staff presented a report to the Finance,Administration and Human Resources
Committee that identified the improvements that have been made to the Management
Performance Review Program(MPRP)over the last seven months. The improvements identified
will ensure that the FY96/97 Target Merit Pool Fund of 5.0 percent,and all future funds, are
distributed for meritorious performance,which is performance that exceeds expectations or is
considered outstanding. The improvements made to the program include a revised performance
evaluation form,including performance objectives and measurement standards that support the
agency's critical goals;extensive performance management training to all managers,supervisors
and professionals; and,a merit bonus system in which the fund is distributed as a non-base
building bonus.
Staff also reported that the Districts' pay position is competitive with the market. The midpoints
of the Districts' pay ranges are 6.9 percent above public sector midpoints and 8.2 percent above
private sector midpoints;however,the average position of the employees' salaries within the pay
ranges is only 44 percent(midpoint is 50 percent). This indicates that employees are actually
being paid at market. Also,the distribution of salaries within the pay ranges is very close to the
established target.
Distributing the FY96/97 merit fund as a non-base building bonus will allow the Districts to
maintain the competitive position of its salary structure,continue to pay employees market rates,
and recognize above average management employees for meritorious performance in the delivery
of critical goals. This method of distribution will best serve the Districts' financial interests by
providing incentive while holding the line on payroll costs.
The FY96/97 merit fund will be distributed according to the FY96/97 Merit Bonus Guidelines
Chart(Exhibit 1). Per the Committee's request at the April 10, 1996 FAHR Committee meeting,
the actual dollar amounts to be distributed have been added to the chart. As shown on the
Guidelines Chart,an estimated$204,547 will be distributed to employees for meritorious
performance which is 1.85 percent of management payroll. (These are estimates based upon the
performance evaluations conducted in July of 1995. Specific amounts would not be known until
the actual performance evaluations are completed in July of 1996).
To the extent that there remain equity issues,some portion of the merit fund may be used to meet
this need. Given the recent equity adjustments made in July, 1995, it is unlikely that there would
be very many required.
CSDOC 9 P.O. Boa 8127 • Fountain Valley,CA 82728.8127 0 (714)882.2411
FAHR 96-26
Page 2 of 2
April 25, 1996
This proposal is subject to"meet and confer"with the professional and supervisory bargaining
units. Their current contract expires on January 31, 1997. Negotiations will be underway in the
fall of 1996. The purpose of this action is to ensure that a pool of money is reserved for the
continued implementation of a merit pay program and that there is Board support for a
performance-based pay program. It is important to secure this commitment prior to the FY `96-
97 since the performance based program presumes that the reward system will be in place for the
following fiscal year.
Staff Recommendation
1. Staff recommends that a 5.0 percent of payroll pool (totaling$569,415)be established to
fund the FY97/98 MPRP. Three(3.0)percent of the pool would be distributed as a non-
base building merit bonus and 2.0 percent,or an amount equal to CPI, whichever is
lower,would be distributed to provide a base building market adjustment.
a.) Establish a FY97/98 Target Merit Pool Fund of 3.0 percent of payroll
(totaling$341,649)to be distributed as a non-base building bonus in July of 1997
to employees whose performance exceeds expectations or is considered
outstanding. According to a report published by William M. Mercer,a leading
compensation and human resources consulting firm, the average lump sum bonus
in lieu of pay increase for professionals in 1995/1996 will be 3.3 percent. The
American Compensation Association reported that the average variable pay fund
for 1995/1996 will be 5.3 percent. The average of the two projections is 4.3
percent.
The fund would be distributed according to the FY97/98 Merit Bonus Guidelines
Chart(Exhibit 2). As shown on the Guidelines Chart, an estimated $210,683
would be distributed to employees for meritorious performance which would be
1.85 percent of management payroll.
b.) Provide for a market adjustment not to exceed 2.0 percent of payroll (totaling
$227,766)or CPI for Los Angeles-Anaheim-Riverside, all urban consumers,
whichever is lower. The increase would be distributed equally to all employees
who at least meet expectations to keep the employees' salaries at market. This
increase amount is based on CPI and other market conditions, including
comparison of increases at other cities and agencies.
2. Do not move FY97/98 pay ranges per the results of the salary survey discussed earlier.
DMM
f.WomeMckinley\wpdoc�stfrep.pm2
Exhibit 1
6-97 Merit Bonus Guidelines
5% - 7%
$23,219
Outstanding
Performance
1% - 4% (3%)
$181 ,328
Performance
Exceeds
*No merit Expectations
$0 (41%)
No contract Performance
increase Meets
No merit Expectations
$0 (56%)
Performance
Needs
Improvement
(0%) to I
*Note: 3% market adjustment for employees whose performance at least "Meets Expectations" will be $331,698
Exhibit 2
7-98 Merit Bonus Guidelines
F'
5% - 7%
$23,915
Outstanding
Performance
1% - 4% (3%)
$186,768
Performance
Exceeds
*No merit Expectations
$0 (41%)
No contract Performance
increase Meets
No merit Expectations
$0 (56%)
Performance
Needs
Improvement
(0%)
*Note: 2% market adjustment for employees whose performance at least "Meets Expectations" estimated to be $227,766
V
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
MAY 22, 1996
Agenda Item (15)(d): FAHR96-27 Consideration of motion to receive and
file Treasurer's Report for the month of March 1996.
Summary
Both Pacific Investment Management Co., PIMCO, and Mellon Trust began their
professional external management of our funds in September 1995.
In order to give the Directors an opportunity to review the month-end reports available from
PIMCO, and to avoid distribution at the meeting, reports from the prior month are included
with the agenda. Quarterly presentations are made to the Committee by PIMCO and our
third-party independent consultant, Callan Associates. The second quarterly report from
Callan Associates is on the agenda for this meeting.
The Investment Policy adopted by the Joint Boards on May 24, 1995, includes reporting
requirements as listed down the PIMCO Monthly Report for the "Liquid Operating Monies"
and for the "Long-Term Operating Monies." All of the Investment Policy requirements are
being complied with and performance to date exceeds the index rates.
Cash at the Bank of America includes a tax apportionment received on Friday, March 29,
which had not "cleared" and could not be transferred to another investment prior to
March 31.
Selances
LEGOBond
SDOC ''March 31 1996
ll.LAIF $ 8,624,809
erica 7,016,427
ort-term Portfolio 51,582,565
ng-term Portfolio 258,396,947
O Bond Fund 4,218
e Reserves @ Trustees 33,518,539
$359,143,505
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends the Committee receive, approve and forward this report to the Joint
Boards.
FAHR Committee Recommendation to Joint Boards of Directors
That the Joint Boards of Directors receive, approve and file this report.
J=PD0C1BS\AG96WAv96l5A5D
May 22, 1996
CS DOC
TOTAL CASH & INVESTMENTS 1995 - 1996
400
350
300
.2250
0
0
0 200
e
150
f
100
50
0
June 30 Juy 31 Au9.31 Sept 30 Oct 30 Nov.30 Dec.31 Jan 31 Feb.29 Mar.31
y
JOINT BOARDS OF-DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
MAY 22,1996
Agenda Item (15)(e): FAHR96-28 Consideration of Resolution No. 96-52,
amending Resolution No. 95-105, implementing
MetraHealth Point-of-Service medical plan effective
July 1, 1996, to fund dependent medical premiums at 80% and employee only coverage
at 100%; and, to convert self-funded dental insurance to fully-insured program through
Delta Dental.
Summary
The Districts Human Resources staff review the insurance plans on an annual basis to determine if
the benefits and costs are consistent with market survey information from other agencies, cities, and
districts. After review, staff came to the conclusion that the Northwestern National Life health plan
was significantly overpriced. Furthermore, claims payment experience by staff was less than
satisfactory.
In January, staff asked the Districts broker, the Robert Driver Company, to obtain estimates for health,
dental and vision insurance. Of the responses received MetraHealth (formerly MetLife)was the clear
front runner for medical benefits.
Delta Dental provided a quotation which would allow the Districts to convert its self-insured plan to
fully insured at a slightly higher rate of$1,000 per month. By changing to fully insured, Districts' staff
will save time in plan administration while fixing the price to the premiums quoted without having
Fluctuations based on claims experience.
The Districts' staff also asked our broker to investigate the vision insurance market. Limited vision
coverage to Districts employees is currently being provided only under the FHP plan. Districts' staff
proposed to offer vision coverage to all employees regardless of the plan they chose at a cost of
$99,324 annually. The FAHR Committee was not comfortable adding vision insurance to the Districts'
benefit plans at this time and recommended deferring the vision benefit to the collective bargaining
process.
The total savings to the Districts and its employees by approving staffs recommendations equal
$926,204 per year.
FAHR Committee Recommendation to Joint Boards of Directors
Revision of Resolution 95-105 to reflect agreement with represented employee units to substitute the
MetraHealth Paint-of-Service plan for the Northwestern National Life medical coverage, fund
dependent medical premiums at 80% and employee only coverage at 100%, convert dental insurance
from self-funded to fully-insured through Delta Dental, and amend the Memoranda of Understanding
with the Districts' bargaining units, and other plan documents accordingly effective July 1, 1996.
If copies of the staff report or further information is requested, contact Mike Peterman.
J:1W PDOCViS\AG96NtAY%15.15E
a
RESOLUTION NO. 96-52
AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 95-105
(Personnel and Salary)
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS.
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,11,13, AND 14 OR ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING PERSONNEL AND SALARY
RESOLUTION NO. 95-105 TO REFLECT AGREEMENT WITH
REPRESENTED EMPLOYEE UNITS TO SUBSTITUTE THE
METRAHEALTH POINT-OF-SERVICE PLAN FOR THE
NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL LIFE MEDICAL COVERAGE;
FUND DEPENDENT MEDICAL PREMIUMS AT 80% AND
EMPLOYEE ONLY COVERAGE AT 100%; CONVERT
DENTAL INSURANCE FROM SELF-FUNDED TO FULLY-
INSURED THROUGH DELTA DENTAL; AND AMEND PLAN
DOCUMENTS ACCORDINGLY EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 1996.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 11,
13, and 14 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER;
Section 39. Article XXIV, of Resolution No. 95-105 is amended as follows:
A. Delete Section 39, Article XXIV.
B. Add the following provision to Section 39, Article XXIV:
The Districts' will contribute 100% of Employee Only premiums for
the medical health plans and will contribute 80% of the Employee +
1 dependent and Full Family premiums. Any change in insurance
rates will be shared equally in same ratio as premiums are currently
paid by the Districts and employees.
Section 44, Article XXIV, of Resolution No. 95-105 is amended as follows:
A. Delete "Self-funded."
B. Add "Fully-insured."
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 22, 1996.
JAWPDOG�SRESVES96 &62WPD
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
MAY 22, 1996
Agenda Item (15)(fl: FAHR96-31 Consideration of responses to the
Request for Proposals to develop a General
Liability Risk Management Program for the
Districts
Summary
On March 13, 1996,the Finance Administration and Human Resources(FAHR) Committee considered a
motion to receive and file a staff report regarding review of the Districts'risk management and insurance
activities.
The purpose of the program evaluation was to initiate a regular review of the Districts'Risk Management
Program and to recommend both short-term and medium-term improvements,based on industry
benchmarks. At this meeting,the Committee authorized staff to solicit formal proposals for general liability
insurance through Robert F. Driver Associates,the Special District Risk Management Authority and the
California Sanitation Risk Management Authority.
This Rem reports on the Request for Proposal process for development of a General Liability Risk
Management Program for the Districts effective July 1, 1996.
Staff Recommendation
1) Receive and file this report.
2) Select the proposal submitted by Robert F.Driver to secure Comprehensive General Liability and
Excess Liability insurance coverage for the Districts with a Self Insured Retention of$100,000,
and a premium cost of approximately$118,750,and recommend approval to the Joint Boards of
Directors with an effective date of July 1,1996.
3) Provide direction to staff regarding further investigation on the issue of Known Events Risk
Transfer.
FAHR Committee Recommendation to Joint Boards of Directors
The FAHR Committee recommends that the Joint Boards of Directors:
1. Select the proposal submitted by Robert F. Driver to secure Comprehensive General Liability and
Excess Liability insurance coverage for the Districts with a Self Insured Retention of$100,000,
and a premium cost of approximately$118,750,and recommend approval to the Joint Boards of
Directors with an effective date of July 1, 1996; and,
2. Direct staff to further investigate the issue of"Known Events Risk Transfer."
If copies of the staff report or further information is requested, contact Steve Kozak.
JAW PDOCXBSV G96VAAY9e\5.l5F
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
MAY 22, 1996
Agenda Item (15)(g): FAHR96-33 Consideration of motion to approve
payment of final billing amounts for the landfill
acquisition due diligence consultant team.
Summary
The final billing amounts for the consulting team who worked on the proposed
acquisition of the Orange County Solid Waste Management System were presented to
the FAHR Committee for their review on May 8, 1996.
Payment of the invoices from Clements Environmental, Price Waterhouse and
Saybrook Capital would bring the total amount expended on consulting services for the
landfill acquisition project to approximately $401,737. Staff and General Counsel
efforts, are estimated at an additional $100,000.
FAHR Committee Recommendation to Joint Boards of Directors
After discussion, the FAHR Committee approved the formation of an AD Hoc
Committee comprised of Directors Swan, Gullixson and Salterelli to review the billings of
Price Waterhouse and Saybrook Capital in more detail and to return their findings to the
FAHR Committee for consideration..
The FAHR Committee, at this time, recommends the Joint Boards of Directors approve
the final payment of$69,945.28 to Clements Environmental.
J:\W PDOCTIN\CRANE\FPC.MTGWAHR.96\PENNY.KYL\FAMRW.M
May 8, 1996
STAFF REPORT
FAHR96-33: Consideration of motion to approve payment of final billing amounts for
the Landfill Acquisition due diligence consultant team
Summary
The final billing amounts for the consulting team who worked on the proposed acquisition of the
Orange County Solid Waste Management System are presented for the FAHR Committee's review
and approval for payment.
Background
A team of consultants was retained to provide technical and analytical support to Districts'Ad Hoc
Committee re Landfill Issues,while working on the solid waste management acquisition project.
The team included the following firms:
Consultant Firm Discipline
The Diamond Group Public relations and governmental liaison.
Planning Solutions LAFCO application preparation.
Clements Environmental Technical review of the County's dosed landfill sites and
solid waste industry analysis.
Price Waterhouse Financial modeling and system valuation.
Saybrook Capital Financial analysis.
On March 27, 1996, the Districts Joint Boards of Directors voted to withdraw the Districts' offer to
purchase the County landfill system. At this time, staff is concluding the project, attempting to
secure a refund of the $100,000 deposit paid to the County in December 1995, and settling the
final billing statements with the consultant team. All of the invoices from The Diamond Group and
Planning Solutions have been paid and the contracts are being closed. Those billing amounts are
$24,000 and$12,000 respectively for all known charges through April 1996.
With regard to Clements Environmental, the total of all invoices for work completed amounts to
$168,945.28; a $68,945.28 overrun of the$100,000 initially authorized by their contract. The work
constituting the overrun(closed landfill site assessments), however,was essential to the project
during the seventy-five day exclusive negotiations period,and came at a point that did not allow for
securing pre-approval. Staff was advised of the additional work Clements needed to complete on
the closed landfill site investigations,directed the consultant to complete their studies, and now
recommends that Clements Environmental be paid in full.
Cs00C 0 P.O.Boa 8127 0 Fountain Valley,CA 92729-e127 0 (714)9e2-2411
FAHR96-33
Page 2
May 8, 1996
Price Waterhouse and Saybrook Capital participated on the project team providing system
valuation,financial advice and modeling expertise. They initially became involved in the landfill
acquisition project through their relationship as the professional team for the OCIP Creditors'
Committee. Their assistance on the project was valuable and the deliverables produced served to
guide critical decisions by the Districts. In December, as the seventy-five day exclusive
negotiations period was proposed to the County Board of Supervisors, and the Districts' due
diligence efforts accelerated, the Districts became, in essence, direct clients of Price Waterhouse
and Saybrook Capital.
These firms, however, did not have contracts in place with the Districts, and their consultant fees
were left for negotiations until this time. Both firms have submitted final invoices representing their
total work effort during the due diligence process. Although Districts' staff concurs with the value
and quality of the assistance provided by both firms, staff has endeavored to negotiate more
favorable final invoice amounts. Through our negotiations, both fines have agreed to discount their
final billings by 14 percent. The following are the final billing amounts and those amounts
discounted by the proposed 14 percent
Negotiated Amounts
Firm Invoice (Final billing amount
Amounts discounted by 14%)
Price Waterhouse $146.470.71 $125,104.81
Saybrook Capital 83,357.55 71,687.50
Payment of these invoices would bring the total amount expended on consulting services for the
landfill acquisition project to $401,737.59.
Staff recommends the payment of Clements Environmental, Price Waterhouse and Saybrook
Capital in the fallowing amounts:
Recommended
Finn Final Payments
Clements Environmental $ 69,945.28
Price Waterhouse 125,104.81
Saybrook Capital 71,687.50
Total $266.737.59
Staff Recommendation
Consideration of motion to authorize payment of the final negotiated invoice amounts as follows:
1. Clements Environmental: $ 69,945.28
2. Price Waterhouse: $125,104.81
3. Saybrook Capital: $ 71,687.50
BA:Ic
JIWPDOC�FIMCRFN@FPCMTOIFNIR.%15TAFFRVr.9F5RFAMRe6.33
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
MAY 22, 1996
Agenda Item (15)(h): FAHR96-34 Consideration of motion to receive
and file Third Quarter Financial and Operations
Report for the period ending March 31, 1996.
u ma
Attached, in a separately bound document, is the Districts' Financial and Operational
Report for the third quarter ended March 31, 1996. This report is a consolidation of both
the financial and operational accomplishments of the Districts through the third quarter
of fiscal year 1995-96.
Contained within the Financial Report section are budget summary reviews of the Joint
Operating & Working Capital Funds, the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund, individual
Districts, and the self-insurance funds. Contained within the Operational Report section
is the status of the Activity Trends and Projects previously identified in the 1995-96
Approved Budget.
As indicated within the Overview section of the report, 65.74 percent or$35,747,000 of
the 1995-96 net joint operating budget of$54,380,000 has been expended. In addition,
the Districts are still at only 71.70 percent of the 'larger' budget of$49,860,000.
The total year-to-date cost per million gallons is $553 which is below the approved
budget and target goals of$627 and $599, respectively.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Committee review and approve the Financial and
Operational Report for the third quarter ended March 31, 1996.
FAHR Committee Recommendation to Joint Boards of Directors
The FAHR Committee concurs with staffs recommendation.
J1W PDOCSSV GWMAY9615-15H
FINANCIAL & OPERATIONAL
REPORT
For The Third Quarter
Ended March 31 , 199 Y
Q%STPICTS OF
O'94
2p � yCF
a .t
F �
2 �
O A
U Y
�onh'G THEE
Table of Contents
Section 1 - Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Financial Report-
Section 2 - Joint Operating & Working Capital Budget Review
Chart of Joint Operating Costs Per Million Gallons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Charts on the Gallonage Charge by Department . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Divisional Contributions to Gallonage Charge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Summary of Expenses by Major Category . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Summary of Expenses by Line Item . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Summary of Revenues by Line Item . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Comparison of Expenses by Department . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
-d Chart of Total Flows-Year-To-Date . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Chart of Staffing Trends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Section 3 - Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Review
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Graphs by Type and Funding Source . . . . . . . . 1
Summary of Joint Works Construction Requirement- Current Year . . . . . . . . . . 2
Summary of Joint Works Construction Requirement- Project Life . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Section 4- Budget Review by District
Summary Budget Reviews-All Districts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
District No. 1 Budget Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
District No. 2 Budget Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
District No. 3 Budget Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
District No. 5 Budget Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
District No. 6 Budget Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
District No. 7 Budget Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
District No. 11 Budget Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
District No. 13 Budget Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
District No. 14 Budget Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Section 5- Self-Insurance Funds Budget Reviews
Medical Fund Budget Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Public Liability Fund Budget Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Workers' Compensation Budget Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Operational Report-
Section 6 -Activity Trends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Section 7 - Project Tracking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
i
� I
V
This page was intentionally left blank I I
L'
U
L�
LI
�J
SECTION 1 .
OVERVIEW
J
J
J
Overview
Third Quarter Financial & Operational Report
March 31, 1996
.m This is the second comprehensive financial and operational report prepared by staff
that consolidates the financial and operational accomplishments of the Districts' through
n the third quarter ended March 31, 1996. The intent of this report is to provide the
Directors, staff, and the general public with a comprehensive overview of the financial
condition of the Districts, report on the status of all capital projects in progress, and
outline the status of major projects and departmental activity trends.
A summary of the sections contained within this report is provided below.
Joint Operating & Working Capital Budget Review At March 31, 1996, 65.74
percent or$35,747,000 of the 1995-96 net joint operating budget of$54,380,000 has
been expended. Although net costs have increased 3.59 percent in comparison with
the same period last year, the Districts' are still only at 71.70 percent of the target goal
of$49,860,000.
The total cost per million gallons (mg) dropped slightly to $553 from the mid-year total
of$556, and is still $74 and $46 below the approved budget and target goals of$627
and $599, respectively, while the percentage change in flows increased less than 1.5
percent.
As highlighted on the "Treatment Cost Per MG" shown on Section 1- Page 4, the cost
per mg has fluctuated for each of the three quarters when analyzed independently while
the accumulated costs-to-date started slowly with only $509 reported in the first quarter
and then leveling out at the end of the second and third quarters at $556 and $553,
respectively.
Some of the factors contributing to the fluctuating per quarter cost of$509, $603, and
$547 per mg for the first, second, and third quarters, respectively, include:
• Environmental Monitoring costs, totaling $1,630,000, were reported in
increments of 18 percent, 63 percent, and 19 percent for the first, second,
and third quarters, respectively. The large percentage paid in the second
quarter, totaling slightly more than $ 1 million, is attributable to the timing of
payments made for ocean monitoring. In total, this line item is currently at
68 percent of the total budget and is expected to fall below budget at year
end.
® • Repair Materials were reported at 31 percent in the first quarter, 57 percent
in the second quarter, and at 9 percent in the third quarter. The majority of
Section 1 - Page 1
L
1996-96 3rd Quarter Report
the repair materials needed for this fiscal year were identified in the first and
second quarters and purchased in the second quarter. Currently, repair
materials are only at 55 percent of budget and are expected to fall
significantly below budget at year end.
Other significant Joint Operating results as of March 31, 1996: L
• Salaries and Wages- Although total salary and wages are only at 69.24
percent of budget at mid-year, a net of 19 staff members have been added
since the beginning of the fiscal year that will contribute to the total
compensation paid out in the second half of the year. lr
• Retirement- At the end of the third quarter, the retirement budget was
expended at a higher rate than salaries and wages at 73.23 percent. This V
higher percentage is reflective of$208,000 paid out for early retirement as
well as the additional amounts paid for the third and final year payment for
the rate increase resulting from the change in the Orange County 4
Retirement Systems actuarial assumptions.
• Insurance- The Insurance line item was at $1,089,540, or 87 percent of v
budget, at March 31, 1996. This overage is primarily due to the fact that the
final insurance quotes were received after the budget was adopted. Staff is u
currently examining insurance costs for next year and fine insurance
proposals will be available prior to the adoption of the 1996-97 budget.
Lr
For more detailed information, Section 1 - Page 5 and Section 1 - Page 6 are line item
expense listings. Page 5 is a listing of expenses incurred through each quarter with
year-to-date percentages. Page 6 provides a comparison of expenses incurred by
quarter along with the percentage expended for each quarter to the total expense
incurred.
i.i
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Review. At March 31, 1996, total Capital Outlay
Revolving Fund expenditures totaled $13,876,000, or 41 percent of budget. Total
projected capital expenditures for 1995-96 has been revised from $33.5 million to $22.5
million due to the delay of several major projects such as the:
i
-Primary Treatment Expansion of 72 mgd at Plant No. 1 V
-Primary Clarifier Rehabilitation at Plant No. 1
-Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2
-Fire Protection and Water Systems Modifications at Plant No. 2
-Chemical and Plant Water Modifications at Plant No. 2
Surge Tower Replacement at Plant No. 2. W
In addition, the new Warehouse Building at Plant No. 2 has been cancelled and the old
u
Section 1 - Page 2
W
Overview
Warehouse Building at Plant No. 2 will be remodeled instead.
Budget Review by Districts: At mid-year, revenues of all Districts totaled
$90,206,000, or 70 percent of budget. Only $3.28 million, or 36.1 percent, of the $9.1
million budgeted for IRWD Fees have been received. These fees are low primarily
because the related operating and capital requirements for District 14 are also low and,
although budgeted, District 14 is not currently funding capital reserves because of
anticipated joint equity sales. Connection fees are already at 129 percent of budget, or
$6.1 million due to unexpected growth within the Districts. Interest & Miscellaneous
Receipts are also high at 112 percent of budget, or$17,723,000 because of both larger
available cash balances and higher interest rate yields than was anticipated in the
1995-96 budget.
Conversely, expenses and outlays of all Districts totaled $91,895,000, or 63.1 percent
of budget at March 31, 1996 with no major deviations.
Self-Insurance Funds Budget Reviews: The Districts' are self-insured for General
Liability, Workers' Compensation and Employee Dental Insurance and provide separate
fund accounting for the revenue and expenses incurred in managing these liability
— claims. The revenues to these funds represent individual District contributions based
on each District's share of Joint Works Operating Costs (sewage flows). Expenses to
these funds include actual claims paid, claims administration, and excess loss policies.
The Self-Insurance Fund revenues totaled $672,000 or 64 percent of budget at March
31 while total expenses were$660,000, or 65 percent of budget.
Operational Review: The Operational Review section of this report pertains to the
status of Activity Trends and Project Tracking as of March 31, 1996.
Activity Trends provides a comparison of current activity trends as compared to budget.
— Provided within this section are the key workload indicators of each Division that are
constantly compared with pre-determined benchmarks and re-evaluated over time.
Also included is an explanation of major variances or changes in the data.
7 Project Tracking summarizes all major divisional projects which were included in the
1995-96 budget. This section identifies each major project and indicates the title,
division responsible, the status of the project, and the start and end dates. The status
of all projects is also provided in chart form and includes the following project
descriptions:
-Ahead -On Track -Done -Behind
-Not Started -On Hold -Cancelled
Section 1 - Page 3
-
1995-96 3rd Quarter Report
r
Treatment Cost Per MG
$700
r
fern
$625 r
f5e7 f65e Sm ■tat G4
D2nd Or r
$550 SM Sm 183TO Ga
r
fd75 r
r
fa00
Quadedy MG Cost Accumulated Cori/MGD
r
r
r
No
r
Section 1 - Page 4
Overview
wv County Seniteuo Dlawcle manna•county
Joint Operetln9 Eepmee
mounted ThmuBh The Ouerbn Ended 80096,VmN858 34146
... B B 4 Q E E fl
19"1 3Months 6Me ended 9Me ended
"nand Ended Ended Ended 1NOm 2MOm sled 00
add,. INSIPID2 1221@9 =I °bm.9999m %.m99Mm %offid09tl
Soled.,wo9.e humane 30.987,001) 8,602,801 18,130,746 27,581,016 21.72% 45.36% ".at%
Cho,neem&E0o.ibm (11,900.0W) (1.91s,2401 17.21% 428M6 al
Net Sebd.,wep.BOene)ns M,5).WO S,M).53 13,25.05 30.51,85 255014 46.35% 71.52%
r✓
m u 1m, 0 M,35 8].25 119.04%, 181]% MAR% all. %
the . 1,2 5}0 2 1,ohl M.10% 49. % 8718%
Me all 29100 28.= 65.305 0.97% .01% 5.M11
OIO.up"I be 2M,f00 . 8 80,457 5,85 13W% M. % .59%
OMUENmmellon 187,500 W247 80,167 132,1111 927% 61.0% U.9 %
04.Exeneecteet
re 10810 18,OW 40,859 6, 3 17.60% 48.74% 74.00%
Odoon0a mb 2,100.000 245,75 55,120 1,118,232 1 . 5% 3 .6 % 5.0]%
mnmrelchoeab 1,716,000 246,07 510,0 1, 522 4.3 % 35.81% 81.8514
Cher,lhlma% 1,548,000 2 .75 557,052 M.528 lsM% 34.70% 44.44%
ah Cheml.b&Sumlloe 55.000 M,15
15,027 251,9M 18.72% 30.83% 49.S0%
Theb 125,400 24.430 M,15 81AM 18.49% 44.78% 64.86%
SnNeede,en.neM innocent eupp 148,000 2],842 5,394 84,002 10.07% M.5% 57.5%
OeeroperMNOeupplbe N7.600 61,M0 112,105 152,174 24.5% 54.0856 ".83%
Ghrun0e8edpil4 a J.Mrlol Sara . 213,000 21,708 5,249 40937 10.19% 23.58% 23.44%
OWelde leh Smecee 15.W0 9.M4 24,763 41,285 6.24% 16.51 27.62%
Solks Removal 5,425,0110 1,373,15 USE= 4,099,45 25.32% 62.5% ]5.5)16
Oeer.hoWemend 14D,= 13,W9 16,BM 94,55h, 9.29% 11.35% Ill
r Orypn plant door B none 610,000 12],]84 235,3311 S5,W4 25.5% 45.14% 70.30%
Other Conuaenual Smdi.s 51,SW 66.188 M9255 Sol 10.3M6 42.0994 all
.npl Servl.s 600,000 I57,14 340p54 4119,1M 31.24% SEEM M.52%
Ales a ACMpnun9 MAW law V,818 27,618 M.68% MAS% 30.4614
vs Emin.dm 2MAW 2],M) 70,322 118.408 S.M% 24.33% 41,00%
Oeor PM SeM. 55,BW 00,740 WAS5 3W,111 1&39% 40.07% M.C)%
In house pdmin9 219,10 22,367 116,25 162" 10.21% 5.5% B3.46%
OWelde pr510n0 W,600 3,61M 14,M3 WA? 8.06116 23.12% 0.03%
Pholo pmrette9 32,700 am 13,55 220M 17.84% 41.4896 5.5%
Noucee ende 29.500 10,847 W,234 37,115 36.T)% 68A894 125.51%
OWeldn Emulpmenl Renbl 15,W0 33,712 46,504 64,722 30.03% 42.91 5M%
Dleeden Edulpmmi Rental 126,701) 2=4 45.883 74,115 IB.M% 3).W% INSAM
Ropam Moderate 0175.900 1 1,675,374 1.51411 11 49.63% U.M
Repair SeM.Comment mM,SW 215.672 407.15 540,927 25.00% 48.82% 64.88%
EnelmnmaMal Mondorl 2,375,0110 2B8.9d5 1.318,4M 1,BW.2M 12.14% 65,51% El
A"mifity Mona, iM.WO - BW 850 - 0.42% 0.42%
Research M.= 50.145 187,45 2118,622 9.86% 31.16% fond%
m T41ne0,Threat B meem, 847.530 0 .= 180.3511 3610,434 13.94% 21.5% 66.8T%
OnolledehleA ides 18,0311, 131 171 171 OAMI 1.14% 1.14%
Dl.el lot termalon 26,00) - - - - - -
EletNCPowor 1.075,0131) 2M,M8 404,45 5754021 19.01% 37.2% 5.40%
r Natural G. 1.40,11.000 245,645 421,781 713,25 17.54% 30.13% W.M%
Telephone 128,W0 M612 60= 113.25 21,13% SIM% 901
Weer 75,000 W,412 2141,50 Still 12.06% 311.51% 47.5%
Fri M.m 10.317 Male 42AM 12.5% 3202% 52,80%
Genehr10lher Fxp 610.000 72,451 WIN 15,1W 1944% 30.0% 36.76%
°d A01ADOpemin9F.s 25,000 all 89.129 1240W 14.43% 35.5% 4964%
Pndr Years Eep W,OW - - - -
OeerNonOprExp 84,SW 14,937 5,a55 39,149 16.70% 31.56 42.25%
CoalAm.lbnWnleledebB sery (<M,OW) (1M,1M) (15,M5) (161,257) 27.26% 33.M% 34.31%
Net M485b M,613,000 6.31),0)1 12.70,211 1e,348,576 18.02% 43.15% 62.16%
Not RewnSs (3.30D,O00) (91 (1,53,M2) (2,871,969) 24.92% 52.20% 75.5%
Net Join OphrM9 Expense 54,300,000 11,107,584 24.01 35.975,459 20.43% M.25% 66.16%
r Total Flow In Milli.Gellons M,50 21.808 0,285 85075 25.16% 495% )50]%
Coed or Mloon Galbns 627 SM 5% 55 81.18% 841 5.20%
Section 1 - Page 5
er
1995-96 3rd Quarter Report W
y.
County Unumon oMbkle Oronnpo County
JOIn1OWtMnt EnWnsn
ComWaerm el Cuarlen Student BMM8,1N098,b 3131M
W
9 9 G 0 E E
]NM- 1=1 =I M NV 1Otr 2nEW 3 0
8�' S ]IQ1125 iQ1@& %9LIPMI %sLT9IM 9h9L7ffi91
SnbvMb angers&tundas 8682,001 9,447,944 %450.271 31.0% 34.26% MUM y
CtraBeoW belbco0one (1,945,249) (2,899,00) (2234,393) 27.40% 40.96% 31.5614
NH SeMfl-,waB-e MnMN 6,333,6153 6,548414 7,215,872 32.65% 31.84% 35.20%
oeaolNe 28353 37,886 51.790 24.68% 31.8096 43.51% LI
Insursnon 363.707 383,)0] 362.126 WU% MU% M.24%
MemnMln 28,400 SW 26.355 51.35% 099y6 47.85%
CIRoo EnWnse-S ..San 26.286 32,171 38,398 20.20% W.22% 33.58%
ol6co emmnlbn 30,347 68610 36.604 NAm 49.5]% 27.53% y
OIIMe Fipenso-MlM3 18AW 31,859 28,759 23A9% 41. 0% X.W%
Cea control Mlemlpb 245,769 418,364) 451,10 22.02% 37SM 40A1%
SuBMe."tlMminb 240.W7 384,52E 55219% 21.16% 31.33% 47.52%
C9emlWl oWBUNMe 241.798 285.264 149,446 X.M 0.01% 21.T3%
labobeminls&SUWlM4 85.109 71,818 9S.WB 33.78% 28,51% 33.31% taw
Todh 24,439 31,719 24.913 30.15% MAM Ulm
scm.M tlemiOs&JanMMeI WW 27,842 28.552 27.6118 MAI% MU% 32.93%
g0eroperellllp eupNbe 51.760 W,395 40,64(9 M.88% 38.W% 26.68%
firO W.Wp6p IS Jenl1a0n1 SOMIum, 21,705 286n (312) 43.4B% 57AM (0.62)% 6d
ONeMO Lab Senkes 8.31PI 15,389 iB,532 22.66% 37.26% 4004%
With,Rem 1 1,373,70 1A81,540 1,244,098 M.51% 35.14% M.35%
OBleraefMmmorel 18068 2,9&6 W,BBO 15.59% 3.41% 31.2096
aen SgONmll0eo eCnOn&ImMM.e ran ,]% 107.54 12, W . % 289 % X Mar a SaMee 86,1W 20,)7) 110A511 16.25% 4Cn% Xm
Legal Station. 107,414 1 118.293 0.82% 33.42% 2
]we8&A.unlnp 188M II,r4 3 % 4269% 06"
Engkoraft 42,525 9,10 23.0% 35.89% 40. %
Corer Services W.748 1 1W1W 22. 8% 33.61% 4 .13%
In honpftM 2W MAI W. 0 12. % 51.3M ] .5 %
Outsideohoung 3,654 18889 14 .11% 35.3 % U.53%
ftoboueWB 5.634 , 8.624 26.4 % 35.01% WU%
NMW.&BBB 1880 9,387 18191 29.23% .2 % 45.0%
CuwnOnl RenMl 2 180 17,915 52. % M.23%
oY0la E,WOMn RaMM 23=4 2 ,659 27.295 31.88% .82% Ulm
RepetrMMeMle 625. I,O50,025 33.88% W.00% Olm
215.6n 191.514 IWJ34 9.87% 35.400K, . 3%
yWy�aaI
ErnholmeMl MonWBng 28.335 1, W, 3111822 13.0 % 5819%, 19.1 %
AO Mo 650 - OW% 1WW% O.W%
Rerernada W,145 137
314 0,163 17.00% 47.91% 34.60% I
TrtlnNg,TmM aounta lgu 0120 W,1W 190,- 25.04% 25,W% 40.9 %
UIICOIbtlable Rradars 13 40 - 7881% 23 39% 0.006
olveel Pavan 1a
Elearal Parser 204.598 ZW.4W 1W,555 SS.BS% X.e1% 20.4M
NtlaMGns 226.512 136,238 W.24 23.41% 24.71% 40.83%
W ter 9B.512 351510 W.243 23.41% 51.26% 44.W% y
Walar 9r412 115,698 92,847 24SM W.i6% 33.04%
9 ns 18317 15,201 18W4 24.52% 38.12% 39.14%
General Ogler Eap 33A51 91,3X 389W 3B.07% 42.W% 1i.14%
&CMOCWMIInB Fees 38,0B 53,051 X.BBI 2B.Oi% 42.]5% 28.17% YrJ
PMrYems Exp
Goer Non OWr En 14,833 15.018 10.074 37.18% 37.5196 25M%
Coal&Ibullon MmelMeM6xN (128.130) (20,315) (4,912) MA8% 17.54% 2.98%
NO 1,191eMN 5.317.071 7,448140 8588M5 20.98% 40.SM M-43% y
NO Redenun (947,039) (1,210,403) (880,513) n.98% 36.09% 30.84%
Na JaM CWnIMO Enpanns 11,107,594 12.M.151 11,010,724 30.11M 36.02% 33,11%
TWO FIoa M M01bn GMNn 21.WS 21.477 21,790 33.51% 33.00% 33.46% 1-I
Cdq WrMIIIIM Wllne 5W W3 547 92.04% 109.04% Sam%
y
Section 1 - Page 6
u
r
r
r
r
r
SECTION 2.
JOINT OPERATING & WORKING CAPITAL BUDGET REVIEW
r
ri
r
r
u
r
r
r
J.O. & W.C. Budget Review
r
Joint Operating Costs Per Million Gallons
r
640
r ...............................................................
Budget-$627
615
�e .......................................'""................... Target.$599
590
r g
a
S6S
c .............. ....." ..................................... Cuff.Pro].-S553
r o
540 i
!' o
G 515
r Fz—,,3,
W30 Prod
480 3131 CaHMO
CoeNMG
465
91-92 92-93 93-94 94.95 95-96
r
r
r
Section 2-Page 7
r
L
1995-96 3rd Quarter Report
L
Gallonage Charges by Department
For The Nine Months Ended 3131196 And
$300.00
V
$250.00 �
i
u $200.00
W
0
k 8150.00FE
,q $100.00 _ L
8 i
$60.00
L
i
$0.00
Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Budget Target 95.9E YW Li
1990-91 1991-92 1992-93 1993.94 199"5 1995-96 1995-95
—.--Total MalMonexe tTotel Opentlom —Total Tah Servioas L
$40.00 __________ __________ ____________________ __________
Y.I
$35.00 ------------------_-- ---------- __________ ___ ____ _____ �
_ _____ __________
$30.00 ____________________ __________ _______ ___________ L
_________ __________
M6.00 _________ ........ ..........
.......... ................
3Z0.00. _ _____ _ _________ __________ __________ ____________________ _____ ____ V
m $15.00 __ ______ _____ __________
O _
$10.00 ----- lal
$5.00 ________ __________ __________ ____________________
li
$0.00
Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Budget Target 95.96 YW
1990-91 1991-92 1992.93 1993-94 1981-95 1996418 1995-08
W
Total Management —>FTctel Human Resources —al—Talol Finance tTotal IMortnatlon BervRach —�To1al EnBimenlrg
L
Section 2-Page 2
I
u
J. O. & W. C. Budget Review
�+ Divisional Contributions to Gallonage Charge
For The Nine Months Ended 3131196
1990-91 1991-92 1992-93 1663-ed 1904-95 1995-96 1995-98 1995-96
wd Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Budget Target Yr to Data
Annual Flow In Mlllicn ee11on9 98,048.30 S2,Ma17 84,999.62 84,321.90 80,488.60 96.088.61 we"S.61 65,075.42
2150 General Manager 12.02 9.03 8.45 6.76 15.64 8.81 8.33 10.29
c' 21W Sunni Semmery 0.34 2,12 0.]] 0.83 0.66 1.66 in 1.29
2170 Management Support 1.50 3.70 2.69 2.83 2.47 0.0 OA3 0.23
2190 Communimtlare 7.80 7.04 5,32
rd Total Menagement 13.87 14.85 11.90 10.42 19A7 18.90 1726 17.13
2100 Pemonnel&SexrW 5.46 13.25 a." 8,99 11.78 - - -
2510 HRAOMnInjaWn - - - - - 3,45 3AS 4.03
25M HR&Tfalning - - - - - 5.92 5.25 6.56
ur 2530 Safety&Emcg Re6ponae 7.05 6.51 7.0
_ . Taint Humes Res .. S." 1325 0.98 a." 11.79 46A2 Is" 1728
=10 Dlrof Finance ].5] 1s." 1319 16.95 17.01 17.87 la.W 20.68
rd 2220 A ntlng 5.50 7.63 6.57 6.59 0.24 1203 11.35 10.74
MO Pumhasing&Werahoming 5.39 6.m 6.25 6.01 6.18 an am 7A4
Total Finance 1BA8 U23 2SAI 29AS 32.49 38.67 30.37 MA0
r 2240 Infmmatlon SeMms 6.29 IM13 11.79 13.60 14.15 - - -
2410 Info Tech Administs8on - - - - - 3.07 2.67 2.17
2420 Haniwem Support - - - - - 7.42 6.27 8.18
243o S011were Support ]At 6.68 13.00
¢" Total lnloraraton Servlfech 020 10.13 11.79 13.60 14.15 17.90 15.72 2126
3310 Dimdor of O&M 11.05 926 9.56 9.87 1224
Total 01r cf 0&M 11.08 020 am 9.87 12.24
�. MiO D1nm%rcf MehBena. - - - 3.06 2.00 4.98
U20 MlceB edulhq - - 5.73 5.36 6.47
3330 Plant Mice 34.10 39.27 4221 39.02 38.14 37.62 37.28 37.10
We Co9%gon8 4.08 7.72 3.52 3.65 2.82 3.95 3.04 4.55
33W Me mMwl 50.90 56.40 59.80 58.09 68.68 01.10 63.84 53.65
3360 Eletaical 13.94 17.79 17.66 20.96 20.80 Mae 22.05 19A4
W70 Insirumeniellon 14.W 10.21 T2.51 2].W 29.1] 34.32 32.6E 2T.78
�y TOYI Malmmn8nca 111.8T D9.]9 14&]I 148.48 14T.T8 1T443 187.13 16329
3410 DIrMOpe,40" - - - - - 14.02 13.82 15.70
M*1110 Plad Op udions 148.42 162.78 192.77 105.02 167.90 2 A3 268.96 228.66
m Total Operators 140.43 16216 IN." 1B&02 181.98 219.15 212T8 2 31
3510 Ur MTedl SeWmn 3.59 3.92 4.13 2.88 2.18 9.51 6.55 6.67
35M Compliance 29.58 U." 31.89 30.02 40.30 - - -
3530 Cons,Red,Reuse 51.87 76.98 71.36 W.20 08.03 - - -
`e 3540 Alr Ovalay - 5.09 5.65 am ObI - - -
35W Envimnmenal Mgmt - - - - - 56.7/ 56.26 4421
- 35W Ubna" 21.78 33.13 38.07 44.06 WAS 41.32 4028 37M
35W Source Cmbm 9.01 14.82 8.1] 11.]5 9A6 8.83 8.70 428
Total Tech Srrrvkn 116.03 196.38 189.26 106.11 163.16 116,112 110.87 92A
- 3110 Dlrel Ergr 1.45 4.54 0.72 0.55 0.88 1.45 1A9 1.12
T20 Plennhg&Design(Design®95-95) 5.01 7.89 2.64 1.18 3.10 2.81 1.10 3.98
~' 37W Englneedng Planning - - - - - On - 1.28
Use Inat&Conhols - 1.97 - - - - - -
37W Comb Mgml 5.59 8.06 2.89 3.51 3.04 4,17 3,43 3.96
r Tmal EnglnmHng 1204 2126 624 5.82 7.10 9.05 6.62 10.33
Total Expenses N1.10 682A8 572.111 6r8.74 575.73 611.14 84298 596.98
Lean Revenues (21.01) (43.03) (M.51) (42.93) ImU) (43.84) (43.84) (44.13)
Net JOExpenees 425.19 619A8 0831 05,81 621.19 62].30 599.13 W280
d Section 2-Page 3
L
1996-96 3rd Quarter Report
Summary of Expenses by Major Category
For The Nine Months Ended 3131196
u
Exle. Fxp. Incr. Iner. Percent
Budget Thru Thru (Deer.) (Deer.) Budget Remaining
1995A6 3131196 3/31195 $ % Realized Budget v
Net Salaries,Wages&Benefits 28,687,000 20,501,838 19,043,525 1,458,313 7.66% 71.52% 8,166,162
W
Odor Control&Chemical Coagulants 5,363.500 2.966,382 2,832,745 133,637 4.72% 55.31% 2,397,118
Contractual Services 7,269,500 5,393,661 6.209,698 183,965 3.53% 74.20% 1,875,839 I
M.r
Professional Services 1,512,600 995,363 1,107,974 (112,611) -10.16% 65.80% 517,237
Equipment Charges 235.700 138,840 127.557 11,283 8.85% 58.91% 96,860 ~
Repair&Maint.,Materials&Services 4,209.900 2.387,601 2,453,983 (66,382) -2.71% 66.71% 1,822,299
sw
Research&Monitoring 3.095,000 1,688,571 2,044,127 (355,556) -17.39% 54.56% 1,406,429
Utilities 3,375,500 1,760,276 2,121,135 (360,859) .17.01% 52.15% 1,816,224 Lr
Other Materials,Supplies
&Outside Services 4,461,300 3,015.882 2,512,974 502.908 20,01% 67.75% 1,435,418 'L
Total Joint Operating Expenses 58,180,000 38,848.414 37.453,716 1,394.698 3.72% 66.77% 19,331,586
Revenues&Offsets (3,800,000) (2,871,955) (2,945,945) 73,990 -2.51% 75.58% (928,045)
Net Joint Operating Expense 54,380,000 35,976,459 34,507,771 1,468,688 4.26% 66.16% 18,403,541
W
Gallonage Flow(MG) 86.688.61 65,075.42 67,008.31 (1,931) -2.88% 75.07% 21,613
Gallonage Flow(MGD) 236.85 353.67 364.16 (10.49) -2.88% y
Gallonage Charge($s/MG) 627.30 552.84 514.99 37.85 7.35%
a.'
6d
V
t✓
Section 2-Page 4
J. 0. 81 W. C. Budget Review
Summary of Expenses by Line Item
For The Nine Months Ended March 31, 1996
EXP EXP EXP INCR INCR
BUDGET THRU THIRD REMAINING THRU (DECR) IDECR)
Description 1995-96 3131196 3/31196 BUDGET 3131/96 S %
Salaries.Waaea.8 Benefits
Salaries B Wages 32,283,000 22,353,326 69.24 9,929,674 21.451,820 901,5D6 4.20
Employee Benefits:
Relimment 3,077,000 2,253,163 73.23 823,837 1,645,440 607,723 36.93
Workers Comp 225,000 164,423 73.D8 60,577 173,077 (8,654) (5.00)
Unemployment Ins 75,000 25,013 33.35 49,987 28,125 (3,112) (11.06)
Group Insurance 4,207,000 2,742,616 65.19 1,464,384 2,714,445 25,171 1.04
-- Uniform Rental 100,000 42,475 42.48 57,525 51,235 (8,760) (17.10)
e Total Benefits 7,684,000 5.227,690 68.03 2,456,310 4,612,322 615,368 13.34
Salaries,Wages,6 Benefits 39,967,000 27,581,016 69.01 12,385.984 26,064.142 1,516,874 5.82
m W.O.Salaries 8 Ben.Alice.
Direct Charges-Cod (6,875,000) (4,492,692) 65.35 (2,382,308) (4,450,103) (42,589) 0.96
e Cost Alloo-Cor6Dist (4,425,000) (2,586,486) 58.45 (1,838,514) (2,570,514) (15.972) 0.62
W.O.Salaries S Denville (11,300,OOD) (7,079,178) 62.65 (4,220,822) (7,020,617) (58,561) 0.83
Not J.O.Payroll 28,667,000 20,501,838 71.52 8,165,162 19,043,525 1,458,313 7.66
Meg,Supply,S Services
Gasoline,Dlesel8Oil 175,000 118,029 68.02 55,971 135,578 (18,549) (12.21)
Insurance 1,250,000 1.089.540 87.16 160.460 929,703 159,837 17.19
Memberships 58,000 55,305 95.35 2,695 54,503 802 1.47
rd Office Exp-Supplies 203,100 96,855 47.69 106,245 72,141 24,714 34.26
Office Automation 157,500 132,761 84.29 24.739 68,490 64,271 93.84
Minor Furniture,Fixtures, - - NIA - - WA
b1 Other 102,300 76,618 74.90 25.682 64,731 11,887 15.36
Operating Supplies
Odor Control 2,103.500 1.116,232 53.07 987,268 860,352 255,850 29.74
Sulfide Control 1,715,OOD 1,163,622 67.85 551.378 1,118,919 44,703 4.D0
Chemical Coagulants 1,545,00D 686.528 44.44 858,472 853,474 (166,946) (19,56)
_ Lab Chemicals 8 Supplies 509,000 251,936 49.50 257,064 271,283 (19,347) (7.13)
Tools 125,400 81.071 64.65 44,329 52,786 28,285 53.58
,d Soly,Paints,S Jan.Supplies 146,000 84,082 57.59 61,918 98,534 (14,452) (14.67)
Other Operating Supplies 207,500 152,774 73.63 54,728 125,713 27,061 21.53
Contractual Services
Groundskeeping B Janitorial 213,000 49,937 23.44 163,063 88.134 (38,197) (43.34)
_ Outside Lab Services 150,000 41,285 27.52 108,715 29,999 11,286 37.62
Solids Removal 5,425.000 4,099,459 75.57 1,325,541 4,276,149 (176,690) (4.13)
Other Waste Disposal 140.000 84,555 60.40 55,445 49,256 35,299 71.66
Oxygen Plant Oper 510.000 359,004 70.39 150,996 331.445 27,559 8.31
Other 831,500 530,421 63.79 301,079 434,713 95,708 22.02
Section 2-Page 5
L
1995-96 - 3rd Quarter Report
Summary of Expenses by Line Item 6'
For The Nine Months Ended March 31, 1996
I
% %
EXP EXP EXP [NCR EXP
BUDGET THRU THRU REMAINING THRU (DECR) THRU
DESCRIPTION 1996.96 3131196 3131/96 BUDGET 3131tIM 6 %
V
Professional Services
Legal 600,000 459,146 76.52 140,854 522,112 (62,W6) (12.06)
Audit&Accounting 70,000 27.618 39.45 42.382 67,953 (40.335) (59.36)
Engineering 289,000 118,488 41.00 170.512 31,955 86,533 270.80 V
Other 553,600 390,111 70.47 163,489 485,954 (95,843) (19.72)
Printing&Publication
Repro-In-House 219,100 182,838 83.45 36,262 169,136 13,702 8.10
Printing-Outside 80,500 30,267 50.03 30,233 10,147 20,120 188.29
Photo Processing 32,700 22,092 67.56 10,608 15,425 6,667 43.22
Notices&Ads 29,500 37,115 125.81 (7,615) 19,135 17,980 93.96 i
W
Rants&Lessee
Outside Equip Rental 109,000 64,722 59.38 44,278 60,379 4,343 7.19
District Equip Rental 126,700 74,118 58.50 52,582 67,178 6,940 10.33
Repaint&Maintenance W
Materials&Services 3,375,900 1,846,674 54.70 1,529,226 2,090,853 (244,179) (11.68)
Contracts 834,000 540,927 64.86 293,073 363,130 177,797 48.96
Research&Monitoring Let
Enviro Monitoring 2,375,000 1,630,299 68.64 744,701 1,653.921 (23.622) (1.43)
Air Quality Monitoring 155,000 650 0,42 154,350 75,000 (74,350) (99.13)
Research 565.000 286,622 5D.73 278,378 315,206 (28,584) (9.07) IW
Travel,Meetings&Training
Meetings 134,000 127,301 95.06 6,619 132,908 (5,527) (4.16)
Training 513,500 233,053 45.39 280,447 - 233,053 N/A
Uncelectable Accounts 15,000 171 1.14 14,629 - 171 NIA
utilities
Diesel For Generators 25,000 - 0.00 25,000 5,964 (5,964) (100.00)
Power 1,015,000 575,021 53.49 499,979 585,274 (10,253) (1.75)
Natural Gas 1,400,000 713,263 50.95 686,737 688,216 25,047 3.64
Telephone 125,50D 113.265 90.25 12,235 89,024 24,241 27.23
Water 750,000 358,727 47.83 391,273 752,657 (393,930) (52.34) V
Other Expenses
Freight 79,700 42,062 52.80 37,618 46,396 (4,314) (9.30)
General&Safety 539,000 198,150 36.76 340,850 339,507 (141,357) (41.64)
Aqmd Operating Fees 250,000 124,090 49.64 125,910 98,550 25,540 25.92 sr
Prior Years Expense 20,000 - 0.00 20,000 86,885 (86.865) (100.00)
Other Non-0per Expense 94,500 39.929 42.25 54,571 61,726 (21,797) (35.31)
Net J.O.-Mass,Supp,&Sam. 29,983,000 18,507,833 61.73 11,475,167E453
(242,641) (1.29) W
Cost Alloc-Cori&Other (470.000) (161,257) 34.31 (308,743) 179,026 (52.61)
Net J.O..Matis,Supp,&Serv. 29,513,000 16,346,576 62.16 11,166,424 (63,615) (0.35)Total J.O.Requirements 58.180,000 38,848,414 66.77 19,331,586 1,394,698 3.72 W
Less:: Revenue (3,810,000) (2,895.251) 75.99 (914,749) (2,958,709) 63,458 (2.14)
Cost Allocation
-CORF, Dists,&Other 10,000 23,296 232.96 (13,296) 12,764 10,532 82.51 W
Net Revenue (3,800,000) (2,871,955) 75.58 (928,045) (2,945,945) 73,990 (2.51)
Net J.O.Expenditures 54,380,000 35,976,459 68.16 18,403,541 34,507,771 1,46B,6BB 4.26
W
Section 2-Page 8
J. O. & W. C. Budget Review
Summary of Joint Operating Revenues by Line Item
For The Nine Months Ended March 31, 1996
REV REV REV INCR INCR
BUDGET THRU THRU REMAINING THRU (DECK) (DECR)
DESCRIPTION 1995.96 3/31196 3131196 BUDGET 3131195 $ %
- INTER DIST SEWER USE 1,450,000 1,362,298 93.95 87,702 1,097,931 264,367 24.08
WASTEHAULER 500,000 225,933 45.19 274,067 296,232 (70.299) (23.73)
IRWD SLUDGE DISPOSA 650,000 519,993 80.00 130,007 372,919 147,074 39.44
_ WASTE HAULER PENAL - - N/A - - WA
SCRAP SALES 10,000 13,877 138.77 (3,877) 47,384 (33,507) (70.71)
o OTHER SALES 5,000 1,430 28.60 3,570 974 456 46.82
SIOSOUDS REUSE 10,000 - - 10,000 6,722 (6,722) (100.00)
RENTS & LEASES 70,000 73,201 104.57 (3,201) 51,250 21.951 42.83
CONTRIBUTION IN AID - - WA - - WA
GENERAL NON-OPERATI 100,000 71,693 71.69 28,307 56,791 14,902 26.24
-- VEHICLE & EQUIP 200,000 141,086 70.64 58.914 141,694 (608) (0.43)
MAILING FEE 5,000 170 3.40 4,830 180 (10) (5.56)
SAMPLING CHARGES 250,000 189,656 75.86 60,344 202,781 (13,125) (6.47)
- . PRIOR YEAR INCOME 50,000 - - 50,000 375,953 (375,953) (100.00)
POWER SALES 500,000 272,618 54.52 227.382 295,134 (22,516) (7.63)
TOTALJO REVENUES 3,800,000 2.871.955 75.58 928,045 2,945,945 (73,990) (2.51)
b
m
- Section 2-Page 7
d
V
1995-96 - 3rd Quartrer Report
Comparisons of Expenses by Department it
For The Nine Months Ended March 31, 1996
1995.96
1993-94 1994-95 1994.95 Adopted Year to Date Budget% L
Department and Division Actual Budget Actual Budget 3131198 Reamed
General Managers Department b,
Executive Management 669,751 1,009,3D0 1,410,640 763,700 669,302 87.64%
Board Secretary 70,207 208.000 58.560 143,600 84,259 58.68%
Management Support - - - 54,700 14,760 26.98%
Communicetions 238,966 441,600 218,598 676,400 346,262 51.19%
Total 878,924 1.658.900 1,687.798 1,638.400 1,114,583 68.03%
Human Resources Department
Human Resources Administration 758,065 1,126,600 1,042,149 299,000 262379 87.75%
Human Resources&Training - - - 512,800 362:133 70.82%
Safety&Emergency Response 611,200 499,805 81.77%
Total 758,055 1.126.500 1,042.149 1,423,000 1,124,317 79.01%
Finance Department W
Finance Administration 1,420.950 1,413,800 1,610,739 1,549,000 1,345.651 86.87%
Accounting 555.449 815,600 817,505 1.042,800 698,765 67.01%
Purchasing&Warehousing 506,788 647,400 546,640 760,500 484.239 63.67% y
Total 2,483.187 2,876,800 2,874,885 3,352,300 2,528,655 75.43%
Information Technology Department
Into Tech Administration 1,146.921 1,699,300 1,251,701 266.100 141418 53.14% 60
Hardware Support - - - 643,250 532:554 82.79%
Software&Plant Automation Support 642.250 845,720 131.68%
Total 1,146,921 1,699,300 1,261,701 1,551,600 1,519,692 97.94%
Maintenance Department
Maintenance Administration 832,102 1,107,100 1,083,020 266,000 324,295 122.38%
Maintenance Scheduling - - 496.400 356,188 71.75%
Plant Maintenance 3,290,595 3,458,100 3,197,821 3,261.300 2,414,570 74.04%
Collection Facilities Maintenance 299.426 365,900 249.469 342.300 295,929 86.45%
Mechanical Maintenance 4,898.622 5,574,700 5,192,640 5,816,600 3,485,037 59.92%
Electrical Maintenance 1,767.675 1,902.300 1,856,601 1,964.000 1.291.272 65.75% I
Instrumentation Maintenance 2,346.636 2,713,800 2,581,127 2975100 1807661 60.76% LI
Total 13.436,058 15,121,900 14,160.678 15:120:700 9:974:952 65.97%
Operations Department
Operations Administration - - - 1,241.700 1.025.442 82.58% 6.1
Plant Operations 15,601,211 15,840,800 14,862,879 22,957,600 14,873,175 64.79%
Total 15,601,211 15,840,800 14,862,879 24,199,300 15,898,617 65.70% 1
Technical Services Department W
Technical Services Administration 243,052 256,200 193,053 833,100 427,817 51.35%
Environmental Management 9,057,D47 10,533,300 10,163,160 4,921,400 2,877,213 68.46%
Environmental Sciences Lab 3,715.233 3,471,950 3,241,725 3,581,600 2,425,300 67.72%
Source Control 991.029 276,750 839,942 773,700 284,757 36.80% 1019
Total 14,006,361 14,638,200 14,437,870 10,109,800 6,015,087 59.50%
Engineering Department
Engineering Administration 46,212 56,000 78,229 125,400 72,799 58.05% y
Design Engineering 148,366 221,000 281,346 243,800 258,833 106.17%
Engineering Planning - - - 54,200 83,195 163.50%
Construction Management 296.125 102.600 268,956 361,50D 257,684 71.28%
Total 490,703 379,60D 628,531 784,900 672,511 85.68% V
Less Joint Operating Revenues (3,620,154) (3.700,000) (4,649,515) (3.800,000) (2,871,955) 75.58%
Net Joint Operating Expenses 45,180,264 49.542,000 4 2296,976 54,380,000 35,976.459 86d6%
Section 2-Page 8
y
J.O. & W.C. Budget Review
r
Total Flows -Year-To-Date
For The Nine Months Ended 3131/96
r
- 68,000
r
67,000 __________________s_________ ________________-____--____ __________________
e „
C
O 65,000
— __________________r__________________r_-________ _______r__________________
A
su �
O
E
w
61,000
Msr-92 ma O Mar-94 Mar-95 Merv98
Nine Months Ended
w
- - Section 2 - Page 9
i
1995-96 3rd Quarter Report
LJ
Staffing Trends
For The Nine Months Ended 3131196
710 L
670 L
♦ � r
m
m
m
T
650
E
m
E 630 '
r
IL
570
6/30192 Gram a0w Gram 3131M ff
Ym
tAuOarized —*—Actual I
W
L
v
i..t
i,
IId
L
L
Section 2-page 10
V
r
r
r
r
r
SECTION 3.
r
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND REVIEW
r
r
r
r.
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
CORF Review
Capital Improvement Program
For The Nine Months Ended 3131196
Plant 1
v� $5,991,000
43%
Plant 2
$2,336,000
9%
d Water Reclamation
$104.000
1%
Consl.in Progress Interplant 8 Joint Facilities
_ $153.000 $3,731,000
u % 25%
Equipment Special Projects
$1,350,000 8 Studies
11% $203.000
® 1%
Total Capital Improvement Expenditures - $13,876,000
District No.2
$2,452,000 District No.3
29.43% $2.524,000
30.46
Distnd No. 1
$810,aD0
9.83.% )No6
ct No.5
98.000
e Distnct Na. 14 D .61%
$523,000 Distnd No. 13 Dislrid No.11 Distnd No.7 $394,000
-- 6.31% $80,000 $519,000 $687.000 4,69%
m 0.96% 6.32% 8.39%
Total Capital Improvement Funding - $13,876,000
Section 3-Page 1
L
FY 1995-96 3rd Quarter Report
Summary of Joint Works Contruction Requirements -Current Year
For the Nine Months Ended 3131196
199556 1996.98 y
1995.96 Actual Remaining Projected
Budget ag 3/31196 Budget Outlay
A.Reclamation Plant 1 New and Rebudgeted Major Projects:
1.Electrification of Pump Drives, P1-36-1 50,000 469,702 (419,702) 509,702
2.Secondary Treatment Expansion to 90 MGD,P1-36-2 6,335,000 4,372.796 1,962,204 8,572,796
Value Engineering for Secondary Treatment, P1-36-2 165,000 7,330 157,870 7,330
3.Primary Treatment 72 MGD Expansion, Pt-37 164,626 6,305 159,321 5,305
Compressed Natural Gas Refueling Station,Pi-51 835,374 24,930 810444 24,930
4.Security S Landscaping,P1-38-1 10,000 87,322 (77:322) 92,322
5.Misc.Mods.Priority Elements P1-38-2 10,000 263,322 (253.322) 273,322
6.Misc.Modifications to Plant 1,Pi-38-4 50,000 310,461 (260,461) 315,461
7.Fire Protection,Signs and Water Sys Mods.,P1-3M 900,000 30,044 869,056 530,044
8. Electl. Facility Modifns&Safety Upgrades,Pt-40-1 - 2,885 (2,885) 12,885
9.Fac Modi&Safety Upgrades, P140-2 500,000 27,2a2 472,718 42,282
10.Prim Clarifiers 3,4&5 Rehab. P141 1,000,000 63,412 936.588 463,412
11.Seimic Retrofit of Non-Structure Systems,P143 - 2,785 (2,785) 12785
12.Seismic Retrofit Stmclual Items,P144-1,2,3 100,000 48,750 51,250 123:750
13.Chemical and Waslehauler Facility Modifns, P146-2,3 - 11,092 (11,092) 61,092
14. 12KV Distribution System for Support Facilities,Pl47 400,000 13,192 388,808 33,192
15.Misc Architectural&Treatment Pit Imprvmts,P148 360,968 13,138 347,830 13,138 V
Information Technologies Trailer Conplex,Pl48-1 39,032 39,032 62,170
23.Miscellaneous Special Projects Pint. 1, Pl49 50,000 - 50,000 -
24.Misc.Job Plan Projects (See Schedule C) 500,000 197.999 302,001 247.999
v
Sub Total -Reclamation Plant l 11,470,000 5,990,779 5,479.221 11,403,917
B.Plant 2 New and Rebudgeted Major Projects:
1.Support Facilities and Site Improvements
a.Operations Building,P2-23-5-1 350,000 91,868 258,132 101.868
b.Warehouse Building, P2.35.2 959.000 25,865 933135 25,865 '1
Renovation of Existing VJhse, P2-23-5-2R 441,000 730 440:270 736 W
c Maintenance Building ,P2-35-3 1.400,000 82,770 1,317,230 582,770
d. Phase II Site&Security Imp.,P2-35-5 - 1,629 (1,629) 26,629
e.Construction Management Office,M-D44(P2.354) 250,000 226,543 23457 231543
2.Rehab 7 Digesters, P2-39-1,2,3 250,000 99,060 150:940 149:060 V
3. Primary Treatment 24 MGD Expansion,P241 - 859 (859) 859
4.Secondary Treatment Expansion, P242-2 1,400,000 1,213.871 186,129 1,318,871
5.Priority Misc.Mod. , P243-1 50,000 72,142 (22142) 122,142 !
6.Misc.Modifications,P243-3 10.000 85.796 (75:796) 87,796 W
7.Plant 2 Influent Diversion 200,000 - 200,000 -
8.Fire Protection, Signs&Water Sys Modifns,P246 1,900,000 40,304 1,859.696 540,304
9.Elech Fac Modifns&Safety Upgrades,P247-1 - 22,056 (22,056) 32,056 I
10.Fac Modifns&Safety Upgrades,P247-2 500,000 38,058 461,942 48.058 ed
11.Primary Clarifier Rehab. P248 500,000 54,269 445,731 254,269
12.Seimic Retrofit of Non-Structure Systems,P2-50 - 15,269 (15,269) 315,269
13.Seismic Retrofit,Structural Items P2-53-2,3,4,5,6 50,000 93,234 (43,234) 143,234
14.Chemical and Plant Water Modifns, P2-55 1,400,000 55,090 1.344,910 355,090 W
15.Misc Seismic Modifns&Flare Improvements,P2-56 250,000 1,671 248,329 2,671
16.Miscellaneous Projects Special Projects Plant 2 50,000 - 50,000
20.Reclaimed Water System Pint.2 75,000 - 75,000 5,000 L
21.Misc.Job Plan Projects (See Schedule D) 500,000 114,549 385,451 189,549
Sub-Total -Treatment Plant 2 10,535,000 2,335,633 8,199,367 4.533,633
V
Section 3-Page 2
4
CORF Review
m Summary of Joint Works Contruction Requirements - Current Year
For the Nine Months Ended 3131196
m 1995.96 1995-96
1995.96 Actual Remaining Projected
-- Budget 03131196 Budget Outlay
C.Water Reclamation Regional Expansion:
". Redmation Plant No. 1 Water Quality Management Study 153 153 - 153
OCSD/OCWD Regional Water Reclamation Plant Study 99,847 103,683 (3,836) 108,683
d
Sub-Total- Water Reclamation Regional Expansion 100.000 103.838 (3.838) 108.838
D.Interplant and Joint Facilities
'® 1. Support Facilities and Site Improvements
a. Demolition of Old Lab for Offices,J-11-1 195,39D 18,646 176,744 18,646
- - Interior Asbestos Removal from Old Lab,J-11-1A 4,610 4,610 - 54,610
b.Central Lab Expansion J-17-3 90,233 4,224 86.009 6,224
Yd Purch&Intl of Racks to Secure Gas Cylinders&Dewars 27,467 1,713 25.764 1,713
_ Office Reconfigurated for Emiom Mgmt Area 42,300 - 42,300 -
2.Outfall&Swatter Pump Stations
a.Surge Tower Replacement,J-34-1 1,185,000 23,270 1,161,730 33,270
3.Computerized Fee.Records and Owg.Sys.J-25-1 419,399 195,388 224,011 215,388
New Safety Division Offices,J41-1 80,100 7,674 72,426 7,674
Restoration of OLd Laboratory for H. R. Dept,J-11-2 601 501 - 501
,G 4. Electi. Power Systems Rehab.Studies J-25-2,3&4 200,000 73,938 126,062 128,938
5. Plants 1&2 Monitor/Control Sys, J-31-1,2,3,4,5 1,600.666 1,895,842 (295,176) 2,120,842
SCADA Retrofit Hardware Platform at Pits 1 &2 273,734 273,734 - 323,734
Power Bldg#1 Air Conditioning&Modifn for J-31 25,600 - 25.600 -
.d 6. Standby Power Reliability Modifns,J-33-1,2 1,050,000 229,228 820,772 284,228
8, Biosolids Disposal Projects
b. Land Acquisition - 431,536 (431.635) 531,535
9.. District Information Management Network
�-, a.Maint.&Oper Mgmnt Computer System 100,000 - 100,000 -
b.Lab Information Management System Upgrades 116,169 - 116,169 -
- c. Financial Information System 600,000 90,208 509,792 110,208
d.Network System Integration 237,300 16,144 221,156 36,000
r Network Integration Consulting 42,700 14,484 28,216 14,484
Replace Fuel System Control 60,000 - 60,000 -
e.CD-Optical Data Archiving 50,000 - 50,000 -
10. In-Plant Sampling System Modifn 69,740 - 69,740 -
Final Sampler System Upgrades 30,260 18,867 11,393 18,867
11.Improvements to Central Generation 257,800 - 257,800 -
" " Boiler Chemical Dosing System 2,800 13,035 (11,135) 13,936
Piping Insulation Addition 4,800 332 4,468 332
Steam System Modifn 34,800 - 34,600 -
_ 12. Cable Tray Improvements 100,000 - 100.000 -
13. Misc Job Plan Projects (See Schedule E) 500,00D 417,063 82.937 517.083
d Transfer from D.Items 10 a&b Projects Above 8.831 8,831 -
_ Sub-Total -Interplant&Joint 7,410,000 3,731,336 3,678,664 4,437,192
c, Sub Total -Major Projects 29,515,000 12.161.584 17.353.416 20,483,578
Section 3-Page 3
e
Li
FY 1995-96 3rd Quarter Report
Summary of Joint Works Contruction Requirements - Current Year
For the Nine Months Ended 3/31196
1995-96 1995.96 1
1995-96 Actual Remaining Projected
Budget (rD 3/31196 Budget Outlay
E.Special Projects, Studies & Research
1.Master Planning Issues
a.Pere/Admin.Support Fac @ Pit 1 J-26,J-30 8,833 2,024 6,809 2,024
Distdcts'Office Space Utilization Study,J-38-1 66,167 66,167 - 118,000
b.Peak Hydraulic Discharge/Oudall Studies 347,439 - 347,439 152561
Determination of Peek Hydraulic Discharge 52,561 52,561 - 52:6111
c.Coll,Trtmnt&Disp Fat.Strategic Study 200,000 - 200,000 -
d. NPOES Permit Support 100,000 48,546 51,454 73,546
2.Air Quality Control Program
a.Toxics and ROG Control:Blotrickling fitter R 8 D 90,000 33,830 56,170 33,830 a+
b.Air Emissions:Source Control Feasibility Study/Metal 25,000 - 25,000 -
c.Air Quality Management Implementation Plan
d. Biofilter for Pump Stations 25,000 - 25.000
e.A.Q. Database Development 25,000 25,000 - V
I. Central Gen Parameter Monitoring 75,000 75,000 -
I
Sub-Total-Special Projects 1,015,000 203,128 811,872 432,522 �
F.Equipment Items 3.000,000 1,357,505 1,642,495 1,657,505 ,
Sub-Total-Joint Works Capital Requirements 33,530,000 13,722,217 19,807,783 22,573,605 V
Construction In Progress-Completed At 6130195 153,187 (153,187)
Total Joint Works Capital Requirements 33,530,000 13,875,404 19,654,596 22,573,605
60
I
tr
L
I
V
laf
AJ
Section 3-Page 4
CORF Review
Summary of Joint Works Construction Requirement-Project Life
For The Nine Months Ended 3131/96
® Current Total
Total W30195 Year Projected Estimated
-- Estimated Accumulated Projected Cost at Future
Cost Cost Coat W30196 Cost
A.Reclamation Plant l New and Rebudgetad Major Projects:
1.Electrification of Pump Drives,Pl-36-1 1,700,000 1,066,911 509,702 1,576,613 123,387
2.Secondary Treatment Expansion to 80 MGD,Pl-36 46,835,000 118,137 8.572,796 8,690,933 38,144,DS7
Value Engineering for Secondary Treatment,P1-3 165,000 - 7,330 7,330 157,670
3.Primary Treatment 72 MGD Expansion,P137 37,289,626 166,613 5,305 171,918 37,117,70E
Compressed Natural Gas Refueling Station,P1-51 835,374 24,930 24,930 810,444
4.Security&Landscaping,P138-1 1,510,000 1,573.145 92,322 1,665,467 (155.467)
5.Misc. Mods. Priority Elements Pl-38-2 4,810,01K) 5,007.980 273,322 5,281,302 (471,302)
6. Misc. Modifications to Plant 1,Pl38A 2.550,000 1,927,039 315,461 2,242,500 307,500
- - 7.Fire Protection,Signs and Water Sys Mods.,P138- 3,060,000 463,663 530,044 993,707 2,066,293
8.Elecll. Facility Modifns&Safety Upgredes,P1.4G-1 6,625,000 133.378 12,885 146.263 8,478,737
9.Fac Modifns&Safety Upgrades, P140-2 2,025,000 288,370 42,282 330,652 1,694,348
10. Prim Clarifiers 3,4&5 Rehab. P141 2,350,000 251,454 463,412 714,866 1,635,134
11.Seimic Retrofit of Non-Structure Systems, P143 4.250,000 117,194 12,785 129,979 4,120,021
12.Seismic Retrofit Struclual Items, P1441,2,3 4,260,000 922,135 123,750 1,045,885 3,204,115
13.Chemical and Wastehauler Facility Modifns,P146- 3.020,000 401,018 61,092 462,110 2,557,890
._ 14. 12KV Distribution System for Support Facilities,P1- 2.650,000 141,956 33,192 175,148 2,474,862
15.Misc Architectural&Treatment Pit Imprimis,Pl48 435,000 107,345 13,138 120,483 314,517
d information Technologies Trailer Conplex,P148-1 400,000 - 62,170 62,170 337,830
16.40 MGD Oxygen Activated Sludge&DAPs 65,463,000 - - - 65,463,000
17.Bell Presses(4 Units) 14.300.000 - - - 14,300,000
18.Solids Storage(4 Bins) 10.177.000 - - - 10,177,000
19.Digesters: 2 @ 111Y Diameter 9,100,000 - - - 9,100,000
20. 12kv Electrical Power Distribution 2,477,000 - - - 2,477,000
21.Emergency Sewage Bypass System 1,922,000 - - - 1,922,000
22.Remove Trickling Filters 1 &3 1,300,000 - 1,300,000
e 23.Miscellaneous Special Projects Pint 1, Pl49 4.385,000 - - - 4,386,000
_ 24.Mist Job Plan Projects (See Schedule C) 22.125,000 66,054 247,999 314,053 21,810,947
25.Other Master Plan Projects
.. a.Headworks No. 1 Rebuild,2003 14,950,000 - - 14,950,000
b.Headworks No.2 Impeller/Pump Speed,2016 2,600,000 - - - 2,600,000
a Remove Trickling Filters 2&4,2007 1,300.000 - - - 1,300,000
d.40 Mgd Oxygen Act'd Sludge&DAF,2017 34,000.000 - - - 34,000,000
e. 1 VY It Digesters,2003&2012 18,200,000 - - - 18,200,000
f.4 Belt Presses,2004 10,920,000 - - - 10,920,000
g. 12 KV Power Distribution,2001-2012 1,D99,000 - - - 1,099,000
h.Standby Power Generation,2005&2015 4,914,0D0 - - 4,914.000
m 1.72 Mgd Primary Treatment,2004&2012 32,500,000 - 32,500,000
_ Sub Total -Reclamation Plant l 378,492,000 12,752.392 11,403.917 24,156,309 354,335,691
B.Plant 2 New and Rebudgeted Major Projects:
1.Support Facilities and Site Improvements
a.Operations Building, P2-23.5-1 3,550,000 3,398.576 101.868 3,500.444 49,556
- - b.Warehouse Building,P2-35.2 3,379,000 308,582 25,865 334.447 3,044,553
Renovation of Existing Whse,P2-23.8-2R 441,000 - 730 730 440,270
,., c.Maintenance Building, P235-3 4,000,000 263,D64 582,T70 846,834 3,154,166
d.Phase II Site&Security Imp.,P2-35-5 2,475,000 176,309 26,629 202,938 2,272,062
e.Construction Management Office,M-044(P2-354) 690.000 277.094 231,543 508.637 181,363
2.Rehab 7 Digesters, P2.39-1,2,3 14,225,000 529,657 149,060 678.717 13.546.283
c, 3.Primary Treatment 24 MGD Expansion,P241 14,505,000 4,549 859 5,408 14,499.592
4.Secondary Treatment Expansion,P242-2 18,000,000 16,277,999 1.318,871 17.596,870 403,130
5.Priority Misc. Mod..P243-1 4,850,000 5,011.628 122,142 5.133,770 (283,770)
6.Misc.Modifications,P2433 2.510.000 2,640,696 87,796 2.728.492 (218,492)
m, 7.Plant 2Influent Diversion 2,500,000 - - - 2,500,000
Section 3-Page 5
m
L
1995-96 3rd Quarter Report
Summary of Joint Works Construction Requirement- Project Life I
V
For The Nine Months Ended 3/31196
Current Total 1
Total 6130195 Year Projected Estimated Jam•
Estimated Accumulated Projected Cost at Future
Cost Cost cost 6130196 Cost
B.Plant 2 New and Robudgeted Major Projects:(cont.)
8.Fire Protection, Signs&Water Sys Modllns,P2-46 4,615,000 440,101 540,304 980,405 3,634,595 W
9.Elect]Fac Modifns&Safety Upgrades,P247.1 3,450,000 113,362 32,056 145,418 3.304,582
10.Fec ModBns&Safety Upgrades, P247-2 4,015.000 290,452 48,058 338.610 3,676,490
11.Primary Clarifier Rehab. P248 6,800,000 474,753 254,269 729,022 6.070,978
12 Seimic Retrofit of Non-Structure Systems,P2-50 4,800,000 185,811 315,269 481,080 4,318,920 41
13.Seismic Retrofit,Structural Items P2-53-2,3,4,5,6 8,410,000 3,282,714 143,234 3,405,948 5,004,052
14.Chemical and Plant Water Moditns,P2-55 4.200,000 336,527 355,0W 690,617 3,509,383
15.Misc Seismic Modif is&Flare Improvements,P2-56 525.000 19,648 2,671 22,319 502,651 I
16.Miscellaneous Projects Special Projects Plant 2 4,550,000 - - 4.550,000 den
17.Solids Storage: 2 Bins 5,200,000 - - 5,200,000
18.Additional 105 Fool Digester 3,900,000 - - 3,900,000
19.Plant Water Pump Station 1.170,000 - - - 1,170,000 i
20.Reclaimed Water System Pint 2 4,820,000 5,D00 5,000 4,815,000 W
21.Misc.Job Plan Projects (See Schedule D) 22,250,000 103,950 189,549 293.499 21,956,501
22.O01er Master Plan Projects
a.Replace Primary Basins A.B,C,2006 11,700,000 - 11,700,000
b.Standby Power Generation,2005&2015 10,000,000 - - - 10,000,000
c.Monitoring and Control System,2005 520,000 - 620.000
Sub-Total -Treatment Plant 172,050,000 34,129,352 4,533,633 38,662,985 133,387,015
C.Water Reclamation Regional Expansion 74,820,000 - - 74.820,000 1101
Recmation Plant No. 1 Water Quality Management 280.000 1.540 153 1,e93 278.307
OCSD/OCWD Regional Water Reclamation Plant S 400,000 148,837 108,683 257,620 142,480
Sub-Total- Water Reclamation Regional Expansl 75,500,000 150,377 108.e38 259,213 75,240,787 i 4
D.Interplant and Joint Facilities
1. Support Facilities and Site Improvements
a.Demolition of Old Lab for Offices,J-11-1 76,800 27,858 18.646 46,504 30,296
Interior Asbestos Removal from Old Lab,J-11-1A 153,200 - 54,810 54,610 98.590
b. Central Lab Expansion J-17-3 840,233 - 6,224 6,224 834,009
Purch&Insti of Rocks to Secure Gas Cylinders 27,467 15,749 1,713 17,462 10,005
Office Reconfigureted for Enviom Mgmt Area 42,300 - - - 42,300
c.Demolition or Reuse of Old Control Center 245,0110 - - 245,000
d.Demolition of Support Bldg.®Pt2,J-27 190,0D0 109.504 - 1D9,504 80,496
2. Outfall&Booster Pump Stations
a.Surge Tower Replacement,J-34-1 6,500,000 768,699 33,270 801,989 5698031
b.Oufrall Reliability&Pumping Annex Does"C"J.3 31,085,000 - - - 31:085:000
c.Exl&Rapt 78"to Deep Water w/120"Outfall 92.050.000 - - 92,050,000
3.Computerized Fec Records and Dwg.Sys.J-25-1 4,254,900 209,406 215,388 424,794 3,Bm 108
New Safety Division Offices,J41-1 80,100 - 7,674 7,674 72,426
Restoration of OLd Laboratory for H. R. Dept,J-1 375,000 - 501 501 374,499
4.Elec0.Power Systems Rehab.Studies J-25-2,3&4 1.225,000 14,981 128,938 143.899 1,081,101
S.Plants 1&2 Monitor/Control Sys, J.31-1,2,3,4,5 8.824.400 2,127,616 2,120,842 4,248,458 4675942
SCADA Retrofit Hardware Platform at Pits 1 &2 2,200,000 423,684 323,734 747,418 1:452:582
Power Bldg#1 Air Conditioning&Modifn for J-31 25.600 - - - 25,600
6.Standby Power Reliability Modfns,J•33.1,2 14,575,000 445.593 254,228 729,821 13,845,179
7.Bushard Interplant Trunk Replacement 31,000,DD0 - - 31,000,000
8.Biosolids Disposal Projects
a.Compost Demonstration Plant 9.000.000 - - - 9,000,000 W
b. Land Acquisition 22.000.000 - 531,535 531.535 21,468,465
c. Landfill Development Phase I 28,600,000 - - - 28600000
00 ,
d.Compost Facility 50,D ,000 - - - 60:000:000 L
e. Biosolids Disp.Landfill Phase It 2011 15,60D,000 - - - 15,600,000
f. Biosolids Disp. Equip Phase I&112001 11,600,000 - - - 11,500,000
g. Electrical Power Distribution, 12kv 2,707,000 - - - 2,707,000
U
Section 3-Page 6
L
CORF Review
Summary of Joint Works Construction Requirement-Project Life
For The Nine Months Ended 3/31196
e Current Total
- Total W30195 Year Projected Estimated
Estimated Accumulated Projected Cost at Future
w Cost Cost Cost 9130196 Coat
D.Interplant and Joint Facilities(cont.)
9..District Information Management Network
a.Maim.B Oper Mgmnt Computer System 1,050,000 896,593 - 896,593 163,407
u b.Lab Information Management System Upgrades 505,000 47,773 - 47,773 457,227
c. Financial Information System 970.000 209,073 110,208 319,281 650,719
- d.Network System Integration 717,300 1,786 35,000 36,786 680,514
Network Integration Consulting 42,700 - 14,484 14,484 28,216
d Replace Fuel System Control 60,000 - - - 60,000
e.CD-Optical Data Archiving 125,000 - - - 126,000
10.In-Plant Sampling System Modifn 189,740 - - - 189.740
Final Sampler System Upgrades 30,260 447 18,867 19,314 10,946
m 11. Improvements to Central Generation 607,800 - - 607,800
Boller Chemical Dosing System 2,800 - 13,935 13,935 (11,135)
Piping Insulation Addition 4,800 - 332 332 4,468
Steam System Modifn 34,600 - - - 34,600
12. Cable Tray Improvements 2,400,000 - - - 2,400,000
13, Mlsc Job Plan Projects (See Schedule E) 16,525,000 313,620 617,063 830,583 15,694,417
Sub-Total -Interplant&Joint 356,442,000 5,647.142 4.437,192 10,084,334 346,357,666
-- Sub Total -Major Projects 982,484,000 62,679,263 20,483,578 73,162,841 909,321,159
.y E.Special Projects,Studies&Research
1.Master Planning Issues
- a.Pers(Admin.Support Fac @ Pit 1 J-26,J-30 96,520 274,935 2,024 276.959 (180,439)
Districts'Office Space Utilization Study,J-38-1 201,480 - 118,000 116,000 83,480
b.Peek Hydraulic Discharge/Outfall Studies 1,699,000 - 152,561 162,561 1,546,439
Determination of Peak Hydraulic Discharge 1,151,000 - 52,581 52,561 1,098.439
c. Coll,Trtmnt&Disp Fac.Strategic Study 4,225,000 - - 4,225,000
d. NPDES Permit Support 1,175,000 427,445 73,546 500,991 674,009
2.Air Quality Control Program - -
a.Taxies and ROG Control:Biotrickling filter R&D 440,000 304,697 33,830 338,627 101,473
- b.Air Emissions:Source Control Feasibility Study/Me 75,000 - - - 75,000
c.Air Quality Management Implementation Plan 150,000 21,640 - 21,640 128,360
m d. Biofilter for Pump Stations 50,000 - - - 50,000
e.AD. Database Development 75,000 - - 75,000
-- I.Central Gen Parameter Monitoring 350,000 3,519 3,519 346,481
Sub-Total•Special Projects 9,688,000 1,032,236 432,522 1,464,758 8,223,242
F.Equipment items 52,725,000 1,666,785 1,657,505 3,324,290 49,400,710
G Sub-Total-JoinlWorks Capital Requirements 1,044,897,000 55,378,284 22,573,605 77,951,889 966,945,111
Construction In Progress-Completed At 6130195 95,017,660 95,017,660 (95,017,660)
r Total Joint Works Capital Requirements 1,044,697,000 150,395,941 22,573,605 172,969,549 871,927,451
Section 3-Page 7
m
1
�J
This page was intentionally left blank }L
LI
L
i
,Wyy
LJ'
1�
u
Section 3-Page 8 !W
U
J
�r
SECTION 4.
ii
u BUDGET REVIEW BY DISTRICT
J
;J
s
Budget Review by District
All Districts Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review
For The Nine Months Ended 3131196
Opgtatitlq_Oudget Review
1995-96 Year-To- Remaining Year-To-Date
Budget Data Budget % Expended
REVENUES:
Tax Levy(No. 11 Bond Fund Only) 17,000 10,196 6,804 59.98%
Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of 1%) 31,146,000 18.418,061 12,727,939 59.13%
Federal and State Construction Grants - - - 0.00%
Connection Fees 4,748,000 6,136,403 (1,388,403) 129.24%
IRWD Fees 9,100,000 3,281,091 5,818,909 36.06%
Other Fees 67,511.000 44,120,632 23,390,368 65.35%
Sale of Capacity Rights 644,000 517,299 126,701 80.33%
Interest&Misc. Receipts 15.799,000 17.722,706 (1,923,706) 112.18%
Other 2,000 2.000 0.00%
Total Revenues 128,967,000 90,208,388 38,760,612 69.95%
OUTLAYS:
Share of Joint Works Tani Plant 33,530,000 13,876,396 19,654,604 41.38%
District Trunk Sewer Construction 13,420,000 10,303,746 3,116,252 76.78%
COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 34,618,000 25,231,596 9.386,404 72.89%
Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 54,380,000 35,976,459 18,403,641 66.16%
District Operating&Other Expenditures 9,592,000 6,508,253 3,083,747 67.85%
Total Outlays 145,540,000 91,895,452 53,644,548 63.14%
® Capital Facilities Budget Review
Balance Adjustments Transferto Balance
711/95 &Additions Fixed Assets 913OMS
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
d, Districts 1-14 Construction in Progress 22,693,603 10.303,748 (13,859,848) 1911371505
Share of Joint Works 65,099,663 13,875,396 (2,772,708) 68,202,351
Sub-Total 77,793,266 24,179,144 (16,632,654) 85,339,856
COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT&EQUIP:
Land and Property Rights 2,645,921 - - 2,645,921
Collection Lines and Pump Sins. 277,817,024 (504,803) 13,541,876 290,954,097
Treatment Facilities 19.922 - - 19.922
Disposal Facilities 101,528 - - 101,528
General Plant and Admin. Facil. 855.176 - 24,861 880,037
Equity in Joint Treatment Fact. 692,378,501 (6,006,833) 2,772,708 689,144,376
Other Assets at Cost Less Amon. 91,808 (95,794) 193,109 189,183
Sub-Total 973,909.940 (6,607,430) 16,632,554 983,935,054
Total Property, Plant&Equipment&CIP 1,051,703,206 17,571,714 1,089,274.920
— Section 4-Page 1
V
1995-96 3rd Quarter Report
District 1 -Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review
For The Nine Months Ended 3131196 1
Operating Budget Review L
1995-96 Year-To- Remaining Year-to-Date
Budget Date Budget % Expended
b
REVENUES:
Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Only) - - 0.00%
Tax Allocations/Subventions(Sham of l%) 2,105,000 1,083,451 1,021,549 61.47%
Federal and State Construction Grants - - - 0.00%
Connection Fees 71,000 28,031 42,969 39.48%
Other Fees 6,447,000 4.094,827 2,352.173 63.52% 6+
Sale of Capacity Rights 63,000 61,371 11,629 81.54%
Interest&Misc. Receipts 925,000 1,280,848 (355,848) 138.47% 1
Other - - 0.00% W
Total Revenues 9,611,000 6,538,528 3,072,472 68.03%
OUTLAYS: L
Share of Joint Works Trmt.Plant 3,279,000 1,365,259 1,913,741 41.64%
District Trunk Sewer Construction 75,000 - 75,000 0.00%
COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 4,289,000 3,243,740 1.045,260 75.63% ,aW
Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 5,411,000 3,536,486 1,874,514 65.36%
District Operating&Other Expenditures 587,000 425,689 161,311 72.52%
Total Outlays 13,641,000 8,571,174 5,089,826 62.83%
Capital Facilities Budget Review
v
Balance Adjustments Transferto Balance
711196 &Additions Fixed Assets 3131196 L
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
District No. 1 Projects
Sub-Total
Share of Joint Works 5,414.989 1.365,259 (272,557) 6,507,691 6d
Sub-Total 5.414.989 1,366,259 (272.557) 6,507,691
COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT&EQUIP:
Land and Property Rights 81,398 - - 81,398
Collection Lines and Pump Sms. 6,902,929 - - 6,902,929 Ii1
Treatment Facilities - - - -
Disposal Facilities 11,593 - - 11.593 j
General Plant and Admin. Fact. 58,241 - - 58,241 W
Equity in Joint Treatment Facil. 69,566,209 (590,472) 272,557 69,248,294
Other Assets at Cost Less Amon. 1,424 (855) - 569
Sub-Total 76,621,794 (591,327) 272,557 76,303.024
Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 82.036,783 773,932 - 82,810,715
Lr
Section 4-Page 2
LJ
Budget Review by District
p District No. 2 -Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review
For The Nine Months Ended 3131/96
Operating Budget Review
1995-98 Year-To Remaining Year-To-Date
Budget Date Budget %Expended
REVENUES:
Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Only) - - - 0.00%
Tax Allocations/Subvenaons(Share of 1%) 9,515.000 5,639,917 3,875,083 59.27%
,. Federal and State Construction Grants - - - 0.00%
Connection Fees 2,350,000 2,848,242 (498.242) 121.20%
Other Fees 22,633,000 13.721,638 8,911,362 60.63%
Sale of Capacity Rights 191,000 149,510 41,490 78,28%
Interest Misc.Recelpts 4,655,000 5,108.329 (453,329) 109.74%
Other 2,000 2,000 0.00%
.e Total Revenues 39,346,000 27,467,636 11.878.364 69.81%
OUTLAYS:
-- Share of Joint Works Tant,Plant 9,921,000 4,119.125 5.801,875 41.52%
District Trunk Sewer Construction 700,000 414,729 285,271 59.25%
COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 11,392,000 8.565,771 2,826,229 75.19%
Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 17,819,000 10,587,872 7,031,128 60.09%
District Operating&Other Expenditures 2.202,000 1,812.366 389,634 82.31%
` Total Outlays 41,834,000 25,499,863 16,334.137 60.95%
Capital Facilities Budget Review
` Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance
711195 &Additions Fixed Assets 3131196
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
2-14-5R2 SARI Manhole 155,846 166,258 - 322,104
2-7A Atwood Subtrunk @ 91/57 Interchange 5,319 7.321 - 12,640
2-38 Olive Subtrunk&SAR Crossings for S.A.Widening 13,624 - 13,624
2-37 Miscellaneous Improvements to Pump Stations 325 3,115 - 3,440
2-36 Sewer Encasements for AT&SF Commuter Rail 64,648 115,608 (180,256) -
2-9-RI Cypress Ave.Subtrunk Sewer Rehab. 2,894.115 119,406 (3,013,507) 14
Misc Chgs to Closed Work Orders 6,184 2,364 - 8,548
2-35 Euclid Trunk B Interceptor 8,167 667 8,824
Sub-Total 3,148,228 414,729 (3,193,763) 369,194
�e Share of Joint Works 16,180,235 4,119,125 (816,008) 19,483,352
_ Sub-Total 19,328,463 4,533,854 (4,009,771) 19,852,546
COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT&EQUIP:
r
Land and Property Rights 517,694 - - 517,894
Collection Lines and Pump Sins. 93.701,134 - 3,193,763 96,894,897
Treatment Facilities - - - -
' Disposal Facilities 33,172 - - 33,172
.. General Plant and Admin.Facil. 215.420 - - 216,420
Equity in Joint Treatment Facil. 205,201.314 (1,767,811) 816,008 204,249,511
- Other Assets at Cost Less Amon. 60,100 (15,331) 44,769
_. Sub-Total 299,728.834 (1,783,142) 4,009,771 301,955,463
Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 319,057,297 2,750,712 321,808,009
r
Section 4-Page 3
1995-96 3rd Quarter Report
District No. 3-Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review
For The Nine Months Ended 3131196
O ep rating Budget Review I
1995-96 Year-To- Remaining Year-To-Date L
Budget Date Budget %Expended
REVENUES:
Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Only) - - - 0.00% all
Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of 1%) 10,615,000 6,351,674 4,263,326 59.84%
Federal and State Construction Grants - 1,599,06- - 0.00% 1
Connection Fees 1.410.000 6 (189.056) 113A1% L
Other Fees 22,314,000 14,473,444 7.840.556 64.86%
Sale of Capacity Rights 196,000 147.293 48,707 75.15%
Interest&Misc.Receipts 5,070,000 5,665,506 (595,505) 111.75% I
Other 0.00% L
Total Revenues 39,605,000 28,236,973 11,368,027 71.30%
OUTLAYS:
Share of Joint Works Trmt Plant 10,213,000 4.149,699 6,063,301 40.63% V
District Trunk Sewer Construction 5,288,000 3.417,916 1,870,084 64.64%
COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 10.694,000 7.775,894 2.918.106 72.71%
Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 16,664,000 10,958,429 5,605,571 66.16%
District Operating&Other Expenditures 2,516,000 1,652,696 863,304 65.69%
Total Outlays 45,275,000 27.954,634 17.320,366 81.74%
Capital Facilities Budget Review V'
Balance Adjustments Transferto Balance
711195 &Additions Fixed Assets 3131196 L
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
3-25 Orange-Western Sub-Trunk Relief Sewer 56.609 - - 56,609
11-17 Slater PIS Upgrade-3&11 906,481 251,508 - 1159,969
3-36 Techite Pipe Replacement 1,563,292 357,127 - 1:820,419 rl
3-36R Repl.Westminster Ave. Force Mains 222,510 2.361,219 - 2,583,729
3-371-5 Widening Project 8,177 116 - 8,293
3-38 Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer Improvements 410,491 27,526 - 438,017 '
3-38-1 Improv.to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer 2,420 1,300 - 3,720
3-38-21mprov.to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer 798,678 399,461 - 1,196,139
3-38-31mprov.to Miller-Holder Tmnk Sewer 4.780 12,358 - 17.138
3.39 Miller-Holder Easement 8.752 - - 8,752 6d
Miscellaneous Charges to Closed W.O. 1.629 7.301 8,930
Sub-Total 3,983,819 3,417,916 7,401,735
Share of Joint Works 18,860,104 4,149,899 (844,567) 20,185,238 y
Sub-Total 20,S43,923 7,567,615 (844,587) 27,566.971
COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIP:
Land and Property Rights 280,231 - - 280,231 td
Collection Lines and Pump Sins. 62.069,818 - - 62,089,818
Treatment Facilities 9,922 - - 9,922 j
Disposal Facilities 28,419 - - 28,419 W
General Plant and Admin.Facil. 317,991 - - 317,991
Equity in Joint Tmabnent Facil. 211,213,109 (1,829,681) 844,667 210,227,995
Other Assets at Cost Less Amort. - - - - L
Sub-Total 273,919.490 (1,829.681) 844,567 272,934.376
Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 294,763,413 5,737,934 300,501,347
W
Section 4.Page 4
V
Budget Review by District
w District#5-Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review
For The Nine Months Ended 3131196
Operating Budget Revie�ly
1995-96 Year To• Remaining Year-To-Date
Budget Date Budget %Expended
e REVENUES:
Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Only) - - - 0.00%
Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of l%) 2,415,000 1,637,889 877.131 63.68%
Federal and State Construction Grants - - - 0.00%
r. Connection Fees 47,000 157.991 (110,991) 338.15%
Other Few 2,719.000 1,929,106 789,894 70.95%
Sale of Capacity Rights 23,000 20,104 2,896 87.41%
Interest It Misc. Receipts 1,295,000 1,334,868 (39,868) 103.08%
Other 0.00%
Total Revenues 6,499,000 4,979,938 1,519,062 76.63%
OUTLAYS:
Share of Joint Works Tamt.Plant 1,204,000 461,537 742,463 38.33%
District Trunk Sewer Construction 500,000 507,896 (7,896) 101.58%
COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 2,013,000 1,540,169 472,831 76.51%
r Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 2,007.000 1,298,750 708,250 64.71%
District Operating&Other Expenditures 765,000 593,127 171,873 77.53%
Total Outlays 6.489.000 4,401,479 2,087,521 67.83%
Capital Facilities BD�get Review
Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance
7/1195 It Additions Fixed Assets 3131196
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
5-33 Bay Bridge PIS Impr. 2,224 14 (2,238) -
5-35 So.Coast Trunk Sewer-Intl Phases 1 &2 - 2.481 - 2.481
5.36 Crystal Cove PIS - 0,477 - 8,477
5.34-2 Bayside Drive Trunk - 109,689 109,689
Miscellaneous Charges to Closed W.O. 1,041 10.796 - 11.837
_ 5-31 Coast Highway Force Mein Replacement 5&6 - - - -
5-32 Bitter Pt&Rocky Pt PIS Improv.5&6 1,921 5 (1,926) -
. 5-37-3&4 PCH Gravity Swr Rehab 5&6 22,036 367,119 - 389.155
5.39 Siphon 5&6 695,190 16 (695,190) 16
r., Bay Bridge PIS Lighting 5&6 4,893 3,844 (8,274) 463
Bay Bridge PIS Platform - 1,956 1,956
BBterpolnt PIS Fan Upgrade - 2,881 2,881
Hydrogen Peroxide Trials 5& 14 714 618 1,332
Sub-Total 728,019 5071896 (707.628) 528,287
Shen of Joint Works 2,028.462 461,537 (100,095) 2,389,904
Sub-Total 2,758,481 969,433 (807,723) 2,918.191
COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIP:
- Land and Property Rights 69,740 - 69,740
Collection Lines and Pump Sins. 33.827,105 (381.420) 707.628 34,173,313
Treatment Facilities 7.347 - - 7,347
Disposal Facilities 7.115 - - 7,115
General Plant and Admin. Facil. 39.799 (397) - 39.402
Equity In Joint Treatment Facil. 25.554,914 (218,847) 100,095 25.438.162
Other Assets at Cost Less Amon. 18,009 (18,009)
Sub-Total 59,524,029 (598,673) 807.723 59,735,079
Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 62,280.510 372,760 62,653,270
.e
Section 4•Page 6
L
1995-96 3rd Quarter Report
District No. 6-Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review v
For The Nine Months Ended 3131196
Operating Budget Review L
1995-96 Year-To- Remaining Year-To-Date
Budget Date Budget %Expended
REVENUES: b,
Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Only) - - - 0.00%
Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of 1%) 1,225,000 711,930 513,070 58.12%
Federal and State Construction Grants - - - 0.00%
Connection Fees 47,000 42,563 4,437 90.56%
Other Fees 3.400.000 2,189,547 1,210,453 64.40%
Sale of Capacity Rights 31.000 20,749 10,251 66.93%
Interest&Misu Receipts 747,000 915,325 (168,325) 122.53%
Other 0.00%
Total Revenues 5,450.000 3,880,114 1,569,886 71.190/a
OUTLAYS: V
Share of Joint Works Trmt Plant 1,696,000 611,306 984,694 38.30
District Trunk Sewer Conshucton 1,735.000 1,634,843 100,157 94.23%
COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 1,468,000 945,510 522,490 64.41% 1
Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 2,599.000 1,687,296 911,704 64.92% L
District Operating&Other Expenditures 251,000 223,991 27.009 89.24%
Total Outlays 7,649,000 5,102,946 2,546,054 66.71%
Ls'
Capital Facilities Budget Review
Balance Adjustments Transferto Balance
711195 &Additions Fixed Assets 3131198 L
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
Misc.Chg,to Closed Work Order (32,767) 4,036 - (28,731) V
14-1-1 A&B Gisler Int., 14-1-2 Baker Street 1,079,358 67,045 (1,066,461) 79,942
6-12 Fairview Relief 248,599 79,195 - 327,794
6-13 Air Base Sewers Abandonment 29.599 15,130 - 44,729 L
Airbase Flowmeter Replacement 19,155 - (19,155) -
532 Bitter Pt&Rocky Pt PIS Improv. 5&6 700 1 (701) -
5-37-3&4 PCH Gravity Swr Rehab 5&6 8,891 1,468.475 - 1,477,366
Bitterpoint PIS Fan Upgrade - 9W 960
5-39 Siphon 5&6 36,689 1 (36,589) 1 Yr
Sub-Total 1,390.124 1,634,843 (1,122,906) 1,902,081
Share of Joint Works 2,623,625 611,306 (130,040) 3,104,891 L
Sub-Total 4,013,749 2,248,149 (1,252,948) 5,006,952
COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIP:
Land and Property Rights 662 - - 562 yj
Collection Lines and Pump Stns. 4,179,148 (130,Wg) 1,103,751 5,152,390
Treatment Facilities 2.653 - - 2,653
Disposal Facilities 7.394 - - 7,394
General Plant and Admin. Facil. 94,197 397 19,155 113,749
Equity in Joint Treatment Fadl. 32,001,104 (281,720) 130,040 31,849.424
Other Assets at Cost Less Amort 9,011 (9,011)
Sub-Total 36,294,069 (420,843) 1,252,946 37,126.172 L
Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 40,307.818 1,825.306 42,133,124
i
V
Section 4-Page 6
L
Budget Review by District
District No.7-Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review
For The Nine Months Ended 3131196
Operating Budget Review
1995-9& Year-To- Remaining Yoar-to-Data
Budget Date Budget %Expanded
REVENUES:
Tax Levy(Bond Faints)Only) - - - 0.00%
Tax Allocaticas)Sueventions(Sham of l%) 3,230,000 1,643,444 1,356,556 57.07%
Federal and State Construction Grarm - - - 0.00%
Connecdon Fees 235,000 810,505 (575,505) 344.90%
Other Fees 5,980,000 5,142,940 517,M 86.29%
yd Sale of Capacity Rights 53,000 54,455 (1,458) 102.76%
Interest&Mmc.Receipts 1.526.000 1.640.304 (114.304) 107.49%
Other oco%
Total Revenues 11.004.000 9.491.651 1,512.349 86.26%
m OUTLAYS:
Share of Joint Works Trml.Plain 2.700.000 1,234,456 1,545.545 44.40%
District Trunk Sewer Construction 2.400.000 2,571,012 (171,012) 107.13%
COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 2.401.000 1,671,043 729.957 69.60%
ed Sham of Joint Works Operating Expenses 4.055.000 3,018,425 1.636,676 64.84%
District Operating&Other Expenditures 1.90.000 1,142,852 816,148 58.34%
Total Outlays 14,195.000 9,637,787 4,557,213 67.90%
s. Capital Fac1lities Budget Review
Balance Adjustments Tremferw Balance
711/95 &Additions Fixed Assols 3/31/85
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
7-22 Parallel&Repl.Lemon Heights 173.397 1,654,796 - 1,828,193
_ 7-23-1 College Ave.Pump Sin Rep[Force Mains 16.991 2,559 - 19.550
7-24 Manhole Access a69 14,457 15.121
J-28 PIS Telemetry - 1,057 1.057
Mac Anhur PIS Ventilation 5,705 - (5,706) -
7-7-1 Main St.PIS Improv. Sg852 96,223 - 151.075
7-18 Orange Park Acres Sewer Study 124,537 - (124,537) -
7-19 Cowan Heights Sewer 55,335 - (55,335) -
c 141-1 A&B Gisler Int.,14-1-2 Baker Small
Force Main Districts 6.7&14 2.315.534 152,374 (2.423,775) "An
Bar Mice Easement Index Beaks 13.236 - (13,235) -
7-14 Abandon 9 Pig,7-14-1&2 239.166 615.759 - 854,927
7-6-1-1 Sunflower Interceptor - 139 139
7-16 Lemon Heights Sewer 57,172 400 - 57,572
7-1-1 Glsler/Redhill bunk Ahandonmant 9,716 676 - 10,392
TechBe Pipe Replacement 2,663 - - 2,663
7-17 Orange Park Acres Sewer Rep. 35,160 10 - 35,359
7-1-2 Gisler-Redhill - 22,057 22,057
7-18-1 Mac Adhur Tmnk - 61 51
Main Street Flume Flowmeter - 24 24
Miscellaneous Charges to Closed W.O. 1,212 10241 (235) 11,218
SubTotal 3,105,345 2,571,012 (2,622,828) 3,053,531
Share of Jain Works 4,562,553 1.234.40 (232,630) 6,664,378
'^ SutrTotal 7,657,598 3.805.467 (2,855.456) 8,607,909
COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIP:
Land and Property Rights 1,549.310 - - 1,649,310
Collection Lines and Pump Stns. 35,089.277 4 2.424.011 38.513,292
Treatment Facilities - - -
OlspesalFacilities 10,782 - - 10,782
General Plant and Admin.Fecal. 92,099 - 5,706 97,605
Equity In Joint Treatment Facil. 57,219,422 (503,973) 232,630 56,948,079
Other Assets at Cost Lass Amon. 3,324 (52.588) 193.109 143,84s
SubTotal 94,964214 (50,557) 21555,456 97,263.113
Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 102,622.112 3,248,910 105,871,022
-' Besides 4-Pap 7
1995-96 3rd Quarter Report
District No. 11 - Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review
For The Nine Months Ended 3131196
Operating Budget Review
1995-96 Year-To- Remaining Year-to-Date
Budget Date Budget % Expended
REVENUES:
Tax Levy (Bond Fund(s)Only) 17,000 10,196 6,804 59.98%
Tax AllocationslSubventions(Share of l%) 2,041,000 1,249,776 791,224 61.23% 1W
Federal and State Construction Grants - - - 0.00%
Connection Fees 118,000 373,085 (255,085) 316.17%
Other Fees 3,220,000 2,082,760 1,137,240 64.68%
Sale of Capacity Rights 40,000 37,247 2,753 93.12%
Interest& Misc. Receipts 931,000 1,202,570 (271,570) 129.17%
Other - - - 0.00% U
Total Revenues 6,367,000 4,955,634 1,411,366 77.83%
OUTLAYS: I
Share of Joint Works Trod. Plant 2,099,000 887,620 1,211,380 42.29% L
District Trunk Sewer Construction 1,635,000 1.350,804 284,196 82.62%
COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 2,176.000 1,382,935 793,065 63.55%
Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 3.486.000 2,273,712 1.212,288 65.2.2%
District Operating& Other Expenditures 737,000 455.051 281,949 61.74%
Total Outlays 10,133,000 6,350,122 3,782,878 62.67%
Capital Facilities Budget Review
Balance Adjustments Transferto Balance J
7/1195 &Additions Fixed Assets 3131196
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: 1
Slater P/S Motor& Pump 47 - - 47 Mu
11-17 Slater P/S Sewage Sys Improv. 4,414,216 1,347,222 - 5,761,438
Miscellaneous Charge to Closed W.O. 954 3.582 4,536
Sub-Total 4,415,217 1,360,804 5,766,021 u
Share of Joint Works 3,471,604 887,620 (175,235) 4,183,989
Sub-Total 7,886,821 2.238,424 (175,235) 9.950,010 {r
COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT& EQUIP:
Land and Property Rights 146,986 - - 146,988 V
Collection Lines and Pump Sins. 19,048,602 - - 19,048,602
Treatment Facilities - - - -
Disposal Facilities 3,053 - - 3,053 '
General Plant and Admin. Facil. 30.682 - - 30,682 V
Equity in Joint Treatment Facil. 43,058,620 (379.632) 175,235 42,854,223
Other Assets at Cost Less Amon.
Sub-Total 82,287,943 (379,632) 175,235 62,083,546 1
Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 70,174,764 1,858,792 - 72,033,656
V
Section 4-Page 8 i
V
Budget Review by District
District No. 13 -Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review
For The Nine Months Ended 3/31/96
Operating Budget Review
1996-96 Year-To- Remaining Year-TaDate
Budget Date Budget %Expended
REVENUES:
Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Only) - - - 0.00%
Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of 1%) - - - 0.00%
Federal and State Construction Grants - - - 0.00%
Connection Fees 470,000 276,930 193,070 58.92%
Other Fees 818,000 481,656 336,344 58.88%
Sale of Capacity Rights 6,000 5,487 513 91.45%
Interest&Misc. Receipts 382,000 435,345 (53,345) 113.96%
Other - - - 0.00%
Total Revenues 1,676,000 1,199,418 476,582 71.56%
OUTLAYS:
m Share of Joint Works Trutt. Plant 322,000 146,052 175,948 45.36%
District Trunk Sewer Construction 472.000 - 472,000 0.00%
COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 27,000 15,480 11,520 57.33%
Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 576,000 345,374 230,626 59.96%
District Operating&Other Expenditures 64,000 26,965 37,015 42.16%
Total Outlays 1,461,000 533,891 927,109 36.54%
Capital Facilities Budget Review
d Balance Adjustments Transferto Balance
711195 &Additions Fixed Assets 3131196
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
Share of Joint Works 516,108 146,052 (26,618) 635,542
Sub-Total 516,108 146,052 (26,618) 635,542
COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT&EQUIP:
Land and Property Rights - - - -
e, Collection Lines and Pump Sins. 2,616,757 - 2,616,757
Treatment Facilities - - - -
Disposal Facilities - - -
General Plant and Admin. Facil. - - - -
Equity in Joint Treatment Facil. 6,402,440 (57,666) 26,618 6,371,392
Other Assets at Cost Less Amon. - -
Sub-Total 9,019,197 (57,666) 26,618 8,988,149
Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 9,535,305 88,386 - 9,623,691
_ Section 4-Page 9
L
1995-96 3rd Quarter Report
District No. 14 - Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review L
For The Nine Months Ended 3131196
Operating Budget Review L
1995-96 Year-To- Remaining Year-to43zEa
Budget Date Budget % Expended
REVENUES: r
Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Only) - - - 0.00%
Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of 1%) - - - 0.00%
Federal and State Construction Grants - - - 0.00% L
IRWD Fees 9,100,000 3,281,091 5.818,909 36.06%
Other Fees - 4,714 (4,714) 0.00%
Sale of Capacity Rights 41,000 31.080 9,920 75.80%
Interest&Misc. Receipts 268,000 139,611 128,389 52.09% v
Other - 0.00%
Total Revenues 9,409,000 3,456,496 5.952,504 36.74%
OUTLAYS:
Share of Joint Works Trmt. Plant 2,116,000 900,343 1,215.657 42.55%
District Trunk Sewer Construction 615,000 406,548 208.452 66.11%
COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 158,000 91.054 66.946 57.63% L
Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 1,463,000 2.270,115 (W7,115) 155.17%
District Operating&Other Expenditures 511.000 175,496 335,604 34.34%
Total Outlays 4,863,000 3,843,556 1,019,444 79.04% L'
Capital Facilities—Pudclet Review
Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance
711195 &Additions Fixed Assets 3131196
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: it
Main Street Flume Flowmeter - 40 - 40 v
14-1-1 A&B Gisler Int., 14-1-2 Baker St.
Force Main, Districts 6,7&14 5,827,644 405,807 (6,212,287) 21,164
Main SL Pump Station Improvements 7-7-1 94.911 363 - 95,274 L
Bay Bridge PIS Lighting 5&6 258 202 (436) 24
Bay Bridge PIS Platform - 103 103
Hydrogen Peroxide Trials 38 33 71
r
Sub-Total 5,922,851 408,548 (6,212,723) 116,676
Share of Joint Works 3.451.983 900,343 (174,958) 4,177,368
Sub-Total 9.374.834 1,306.891 (6,387,681) 4,294,044 V
COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIP:
Land and Property Rights - L
Collection Lines and Pump Sins. 19,382,254 (12,878) 6,212.723 25.582,099
Treatment Facilities - - - -
Disposal Facilities - - - -
General Plant and Admin. Facil. 6.747 - - 6,747 im
Equity in Joint Treatment Facil. 42,161.369 (379,031) 174,958 41,957,296
Other Assets at Cost Less Amon. - - - -
Sub-Total 61,550.370 (391,909) 6,387.681 67.546.142 L
Total Property,Plant& Equipment&CIP 70,925,204 914,982 71.840.186
V
Section 4-Page 10
II
W
SECTION 5.
SELF-INSURANCE FUNDS BUDGET REVIEWS
r
J
r
r
r
r
J
r
J
Self-Ins. Review
Medical Fund Budget Review
For The Nine Months Ended 3131196
Percent
Actual of Budget Remaining Actual
1995-96 Through Through 1995-96 Through Increase
Budget 3131196 3131/96 Budget 3/31195 (Decrease)
.d Beginning Cash Balance 15,000 - 85,952 (85,952)
Revenues:
In-Lieu Prem. -CSDOC 400,000 261,848 65.46% 138,152 260,861 987
w - Employees 75,000 33.491 44.65% 41,509 28,665 4,826
Reimburse from Stop Loss Ins - - - - -
Supplemental CSDOC Funding - - - (11,127) 11,127
Interest 6 Other - 1,744 (1,744) 633 1,111
Total Revenues 475,000 297,083 62.54% 177,917 279,032 18.051
Expenditures:
Claims-Medical' - - 0.00% - 6,279 (6,279)
- Dental 387,000 230,3B3 59.53% 156,617 214,079 16.304
Transfer Out - - - 113,162 (113,162)
r, Contractural Services 50,000 33,719 6744% 16,281 31,395 2,324
Total Expenditures 437,000 264.102 60A4% 172.898 364,915 (100,813)
r
Excess Revenue (Expense) 38,000 32,981 86.79% 5,019 (85,883) 118,864
Ending Cash Balance 53,000 32,981 62.23% 5,019 69 32,912
>i
'Medical insurance has been purchased rather
than self-funded since February 1994.
m Section 5-Page 1
Ld
1995-96 3rd Quarter Report
L
Public Liability Fund Budget Review
For The Nine Months Ended 3131196 L
Percent
Actual of Budget Remaining Actual LW
1995-96 Through Through 1996.96 Through Increase
Budget 3/31196 3131196 Budget 3131195 (Decrease),
Beginning Cash Balance' 3,356,000 3.315,495 3.392,913 (77.418)I�
Revenues: iW
In-Lieu Premiums 100,000 - 0.00% 100,000 -
Interest&Other 200,000 127,666 63.78% 72.435 92,007 35,558 L
Allocation to Other Funds - 54,679 0.00% (64,679) 67,a20 (13,141)
Total Revenues 300,000 182.244 60.75% 117,756 159.827 22,417
Expenditures:
Salaries 1,000 3,542 354.20% (2,542) - 3,5421
Claims 90,000 82,877 92.09% 7,123 1,764 81,113
Contractual Services 20,000 958 4.78% 19,044 2.837 (1,881),
Legal Services 150.000 151.029 100.69% (1,029) 140,044 10,985 L
Professional Services 10,000 462 4.62% 9,538 2,863 (2,401)
Supplies&Other 1,000 136 13.60% 864 136
Total Expenditures 272,000 239,002 87.87% 32,998 147,508 91,494 '0
Excess Revenue(Expense) 28,000 (66,758) (202.71%) 84,758 12,319 (69,077)1
Ending Cash Balance 3,384,000 3,258,737 96.30% 125,263 3,405,232 (146,495)
I
W
I�
Includes$720,208 long-term receivable due from the County of Orange. W
L
W
Section 5-Page 2 LJ
Self-ins. Review
Worker's Compensation Fund Budget Review
.. For The Nine Months Ended 3131/96
Percent
.. Actual of Budget Remaining Actual
1995.26 Through Through 1995.96 Through Increase
Budget 3131196 3131196 Budget 3131195 (Decrease)
Beginning Cash Balance' 795,000 648,241 748,810 (100.569)
Revenues:
In-Lieu Premiums 225,000 164,423 73.08% 60,577 173,077 (8,654)
Interest&Other 43,000 28,508 66.30% 14,492 16,614 11,894
Total Revenues 268,000 192,931 71.99% 75,069 189,691 3,240
Expenditures:
Salaries 10,000 - O.OD% 10.000 - -
_ Claims 165,000 111,648 67.67% 53,352 96,150 15,498
Contractual Services 35,000 18,750 53.571/6 16250 18,898 (148)
Legal Services 5,000 - 0.00% 5,000 - -
Professional Services 35,000 9,959 28.45% 25,041 16,664 (6,705)
Supplies&Other 12,000 0.00% 12,000 -
Sub Total 262,000 140,357 53.57% 121,643 131.712 8,645
Excess Loss Policy 45,000 16,245 36.10% 28,765 25,568 (9,323)
Total Expenditures 307,000 156,602 51.01% 150,398 157,280 (678)
Excess Revenue(Expense) (39,000) 36,329 (93.15%) (75,329) 32,411 3,918
Ending Cash Balance 756,000 684,570 9D.55% 71,430 781,221 (96,661)
'Includes$151,754 long-term receivable due from the County of Orange
w
d
Section 6-Page 3
III.Iiy
W
�LW
I�LJ
LJ
This page was intentionally left blank
I�
i�
IWI
IlJ1
ICII
IW
W
Section 5-Page 4
U
U
U
U
U
SECTION 6. & 7.
U
OPERATIONAL REVIEW
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U i
i
Activity Trends
_ Joint Operating expenses through the third quarter are at 67 percent and 72 percent of budget and target expenses,
respectively. Budget savings have been realized on chemicals, as new contract prices have declined, on the ocean
monitoring contract with Science Applications International Corporation, as the monitoring work is carried forward into
1996-97, and in repair materials, because of the decrease in major breakdowns in plant and equipment.
Overall, salaries are only at 69 percent as a result of savings from the early retirement program and an average
vacancy rate of approximately 9 percent in authorized positions. Salary expenses will continue to increase as a result
of 19 new employees that have been hired through the third quarter of 1995-96.
700
$627.30
$599.00
600 $552.8a
500
400
095-96 Budget
895-96 Target
■9 Months ended 03/31/96 300
236.65 236.85 236.64
200
100
0
Treatment Cost, Average Daily Flow,
$per MG MGD
Section 6 - Page 7
it
1995-96 3rd Qtr Report
i
LJ
Board Secretary:
The initial preparation times submitted for Joint Board agenda packages and minutes as reflected in the 96-96 Budget were
estimates made without baseline data. Beginning in Jury, 1995, the Board Secretary's office has tracked actual time spent on
these tasks. The first six months reflects actual hours spent on the Joint Board agenda package and minutes. The differentiation
between estimates and acluals was unanticipated;however a comparison belvreen first quarter data and six month data indicate the
listed time is more accurste than original estimates. These data will be used for future baseline projections. V
40.0 38.3
35.0
30.0 r
25.0
20.0
09S96 Budget 20.0 17.4 u
■3rd Qtr.Actual 15.0
10.0 L
4.0
5.0
0.0
Agenda Prep.Time, Completion of Minutes, LJ
Hot. Hrs.
Communications: V
The number of tours during the first nine months is on target with annual estimates.Third quarter contacts averaged approximately _
500,placing us ahead of the annual projection. The number of informational materials provided is also on target. The division
remains on target for the number of newsletters published Over the course of the last three quarters. V
)r
... 320
V
300
250 240
L
200
095-96 Budget I
■3rd Qtr.Actual 150
100
100 90 66
75
50 25 20 L0 j ,
No.of Tours& No.of People Informational No.of Employea L
Presentations Contacted Matenals Newsletters
X 100 Provided% 100 Published
L
Section 6 - Page 2
L
Activity Trends
Finance Administration:
The required coverage ratio for senior lien debt,the ratio of certain revenues to the debt service coals,Is 1.25. Because one half of
property taxes and user fees are received in December and April,while principal payments are made in August and February,the ratio
will increase during the remainder of the year. Investment Interest earnings are running ahead of the budgeted yield as PIMCO manages
our portfolio. Variable Interest rates required to remarket me COP Issues have been favorable as the"Orange County"penalty has
declined and imesters are more comfortable with our credit and we have changed remarketing agents. Approximately half of our
outstanding COPS are"synlhetlo-(aed"rate obligations. The number of COP issues outstanding is not expected to change this year as
no new debt was budgeted.
r 7.00
8.05%
6.00% 6 6
6.00
flop
5.00
4.00
ri 095-96 Budget
03rd Qtr.Actual 3.00
2.28
2.00 1.51
1.00
'tl 0.00
Sr.Debt Sve. Yield%on
Coverage Ratio Invested Interest Rate COP Issues
Reserves %
Accounting:
r Accounts Payable warrants and payroll warrants per FTE are slightly behind annual projections but are within expected estimates as
they are running at 73 percent of annual totals. Both Industrial user bills and journal entries processed per FTE are slightly higher than
annual projections at 63 percent and 82 percent,respectively.
r
5.900
d 6,000
6,0m 4,331
4.100
4,000 3.750
3,390
3,000 2,717
095-96 Budget
■3rtl Qtr.Actual 2,000
952 782
1,000
0
Accounts Payable Payroll Warrants Industrial User Bills Journal Entries
Warrants Issued Processed Processed Per FTE Processed
Per FTE Per FTE Per FTE
Section 6 - Page 3
bl
ia)
1995-96 3rd Qtr Report
L
Purchasing 8 Warehousing:
Purchase orders Issued per Full-time Equivalent(FTE)are below an expected 9-month trend yet ware higher than expected in the
third quarter. As the fiscal year approaches an end,purchases are made;however,due to feral conservatism over the last nine r-i
months due to the Districts-wide commitments to mduce the Joint Operating Expense budget by 10%.we remain well below Initial
projections. The number of bids per FTE continues to exceed Initial estimates as contracting for servces becomes more frequent.
The trend toward out-sourcing services will Increase formal and informal bids accordingly. Warehouse Issues per FTE are somewhat
higher then the initial estimates band upon the consolidation of equipment and supplies to the appropriate Warehouse. This W
procedure designates this Inter-movement of equipment and supplies as an Individual warehouse Issuance, therefore increasing
reported activity above"actual"Issuance. -
W
25.000 23
1.
20.000 18.670
15.040 15 I
15.000 r
❑95-96 Budget 11.429
9.195
83rd Qtr.Actual 10.000
5.000
0.000 4W
P.O.'s Issued Per Written Bids Warehouse
FfE X 10 Per FTE Issues Per FTE
X 100 W
Lr
Li
I
LJ
V
tr
L
Le
Section 6 -Page 4 W
Activity Trends
Information Technology Administration:
Computer Users Supported per Full-Time Equivalent(FTE)Is based on the number of staff members in Information Technology
Department([To)Waked with providing direct support. The wnent 43 FTE Usim firtat Improvement is the result of a realignment
of the existing seat so that mare pemonnal are assigned to geneml support to computer uses,rather than W assigned exclusively
In special projects. Hardware Work Ordem per FTE repmaent the number of Work Ordem completed divided by the number of ITD
r stet assigned to such requests. The original benchmark of 17 was based solely on estimates as opposed to actual data and Is
obviously inaccumte when compared against the 66/FrE year-to-cate. Progmmenable Logic Controllers are somewhat behind the
annual estimate but expected to W achieved by fiscal yearend. Similarly,Data Paints Installed are running behind schedule due to
PLC Implementation delays.
r 200
176
152
128 120
104
095-96 Budget 80 66 57
r ■3rd Qtr.Actual 56 43
30
32 13 1] 79
r
8
-18
Plane Automation
Computer Users Hardware Work Programmable Logic Additional Date
Supported per FTE Orden per FTE Controllers lrwtellatl Point Installed
(xtOa)
Hardware Support:
w The phone directory numbers maintained per FTE Indicates the number of PBX or telephone lines serviced. Unexpected expansion
in this system has resulted In more number maintained than those n8ected In the Activity Trend estimates for FY 1995-96.
Similarly,due to the increasing use of technology,we have mom personal computers than initially estimated. This case ls also
reflected in the Card Readers graphic. Hardware work orders per FTE else reflect an unanticipated Increase. Because of the
additions of the aforementioned devices,work orders to Install and maintain them have also Increased beyond Initial estimates.
120.0
105
100.0
83
r 80.0
,e 095-96 Budget 60.0 50 49
■3rd Qtr.Actual 40.0
20.0 13.0 17.0 8 12
Directory Numbers Personal Hardware Work Card Readers
Maintamed/ E Computer Ordem/FTE MaIntamed/FTE
X 10 MaintainedlFTE
Section 6 - Page 6
1995-96 3rd Qtr Report
Software 6 Plant Automation:
Software work orders per FTE is well above FY 199496 Activity Trend estimates due to no Initial benchmark data to derive Initial estimates.
This process as been naMorked and automated via a Maintenance Management System(MMS)that allows other divisions to direct work orders W
tolTelectrenlcally. The ease ofdlreciing work orders WIT,the additional internal controls requiring staff to be more stringent In documenting
requests for service(e.g.quick service call).and the expanding other base account for the Increase. The number of network users supported per
FTE issues from additional computer purchases and Implementation. The vast majority of desktop computers are networked to one of several
servers and thus require ongoing network troubleshooting,maintenance,repair and upgrade. sr+
100
b
g0
so L
70 62
so
a"Budget 40 36 W
■Ord Ott.Actual
30
20 7
10
0
80111were work Nalwwk 40
Ordw&FM Users Supported+712
1.
Ise
li
L
L
taJ
t .
W
4ri
W
Section 6 - Page 6
W
r
Activity Trends
Human Resources Administradon:
After further research,the Activity Trends In the FY 1995-96 Budget required refinement to more accurately portray the performance of the
r Human Resources Department.Human Resources surpassed Is goal of 83 employees supported by each HR employee with the
elimination of two positions. Human Resources training as a percentage of operating expense continues to reflect National benchmarks.
r
12.0
r 10.3
10.0
8.3
r 8.0
095-96 Budget 6.0
r 03m Qtr.Actual
4.0
2.6% 2.3%
2.0
0.0 —
Employees Supported HRrrmining as a%
s Per Human Resource of Operating Expense
Employee
X 10
r Human Resources& Training:
The Districts recruitment time or'time to fill'numbers for new positions continues to exceed the National average by two to four times.
Although significant progress he been made during the 2nd and 3re quarter periods,a poor first quarter continues to affect year4adate
r averages.Current recruitments for exempt and nonexempt employees are averaging 110 days and 81 days respectively. Turnover
compares extremely favorably to the benchmark for utility agencies and falls below the expected turnover ratio of 10%nationally for private
organizations. Exempt employee costs are significantly lower as In-house staff are primarily used instead of executive search firms. Non-
exempt employee coats have Increased slightly above benchmarks,but overall recruitment coals are significantly below national averages.
r
r 160 143
140
120
® 9]
100 $85.0
80
09S96 Budget 59
■3m Otr.Actual 60
3
40 7
$17.92 $18.7
r 20 e 7.8% 0.4% $12.6
0
No.of Recruitment No.of Recrultment Employee Cost Per Exempt Cost per Non-Fxempt
Days For Exempt Days For Non- Turnover Employee I Employee Hired
X 10
Employees Exempt Employees Hired Em I
o x 100
Section 6 - Page 7
W
1995-96 3rd Qtr Report
i
WOW 8 Emergency Response:
During the find nine months,woBers'compensation claims were below the annual trend projection. It Is expected we will be at least 10%below
estimated tinges. Additionally,the Total Injury Rate was 6.7 as opposed to last year's 8.9-a 25%dechume. The Districts'accident experience Is W
even mom significant when compared to the 16.3 industry average for Total Injury Ras,and Is notably lower than the We previous years. We
believe this can be attributed to the successful implementation of new safety programs and Improvement in existing programs during the last
several quarters. The lost work day rating Is a reflection of these programs. Job Hazard Analyses and Regulatory Compliance Audits are generally
on target. u
95
45
095-96 Budget
40 1113m Qtr.Actual
35
h25
30
25
20
20
I '
15 12.3
10 8.7
g 8.7 I
5 4 2.5 1.7
0
No.of Job Site Total Injury Job Huard
Workers' Safety Regulatory Los[Work RaOs y
Comp.Claims Compliance Compliance Day Rate ns 10
Audis Audits _
W
V
I
V
I
L
I
4r
Ir
i
W
Section 6 - Page 8
u
Activity Trends
Maintenance Adminlstrafion:
As stipulated in the following maintenance sections,one of the primary focuses of the Maintenance Department In Fiscal Year 1995.96 is
to develop a solid database for our Computerized Maintenance Management System(CMMS),thereby devoting more time to a total
Planned Maintenance philosophy. The trends we develop this fiscal yearwlll be utilized to project future expectations. The graph portrays
the impact of CMMS implementation and resource allocation on the Maintenance DepaNmem,as well as the temporary freezing of
authorized positions(both discussed in further detail In the respective maintenance divisions). Although a 2:1 ratio of preventive
maintenance(pm)tasks versus corrective maintenance(cm)teaks due to the aforementioned Is unlikely,a 50%.150%ratio is achievable.
This ratio is acceptable and considered progressive based on many maintenance Industry benchmarkststandams.
r 60.0 095-95 Budget
52.0
■are Qtr.Actual 49.2
50.0
w 40.0
30.0
17.5 20.5
20.0 15.0 15
i
9.0 9.4
10.0 5.0 5.0 4.7
-0
r
0.0
Preventivo Corrective Meant. Preventive Corrective Corrective Equipment Records
Maintenance Tasks Maintenance Maintenance Maintenance Entered Into
Completed Backlog Backlog Cora
Tasks Completed o9 9 Suspended Outer
x l000 x l000 x 100 x wo x 10 x l000
Maintenance Scheduling:
The Planning&Scheduling Division is a new unit this fiscal year,and as such,did not have reliable baseline data to develop accurate
Activity Trend benchmarks. The goals stipulated In the FY 199546 budget are only reasonable estimates of new job duties to establish
future parameters. Disciplines have been reluctant to remove'unneetled'slock because they believed the Item costa would be deducted
from their budgets. However,we have recommended a reduction in obsolescent inventory by$225,000 for the first nine months of the
year. Asa result of benchmarking preventive maintenance on major facility accouterments,our scheduled PM program for
Pdmary/Secondary basins and digesters meant or exceeds our ini0al estimates. The disciplines are Implementing such PM programs
vs' beginning lest month.
29
30.0
r 25.0
250 22.5
20.0
15.0 -
095-96 Budget 12 11
s 03rd Qtr.Actual 10a
4 4 5
5.0
r 00
Reduce Perform Pmvenlive Maintenenr on:
Obsolete Primary Digester Seconds
Inventory,$ Secondary
Basins Cleaning Basins
r %10,000
Section 6 - Page 9
1995-96 3rd Qtr Report
Plant Maintenance:
The Division continues its commitment in developing the CMMS database and the firms towards Planned Maintenance. Development
support is provided by 2.0 FTEs at the craft level. Continued growth in the equipment records and P.M.Instructions records have �+
created higher backlogs along with the lack of additional wrench support'normally provided by the FTEs. Also,time spent by staff on
facility improvements affecte maintenance backlogs. Development of the area assignment system is behind schedule due to indirect
activ0ias. The performance measures are expected to be on target and completed by the end of the fourth quarter.
kJ
Isw
600.0 095-96 Budget 550.0 --
500
500.0 ■3rd Qtr.Actual L275
400.0 320.0 300 300.0 2122
278 I.a
200.0
82.9 63
100.0
0.0 LW
Preventive Corrective Pieces of Computerized _
Preventive Maintenance Corrective
Maintenance Maintenance Maintenance Equipment
Preventive
Tasks Completed Maintenance
Backlog Backlog In computer Maintenance Lr
X 10 Completed x 10 Database X 10 Instructions
krrr
Collection Facilities Maintenance:
This Division continues with its development of the CMMS database and Planned Maintenance. Development is assisted by 1.5 FTEs
from this division with support provided by 1.0 FTE from the Planning Division. Incorporation of new P.M.activities and the few$on 60
root control program in District 7 account for higher backlogs. Total sewer overflows to date are less than expected with credit going to
the staffs continued commitment to Improve maintenance methods and attention to known trouble areas. Use of contract services for
some of the line cleaning in District 7 is behind schedule. This delay is due to the vacancy In the Maintenance Staff Engineer position W
who was developing bid documents. The Maintenance Manager will work with staff to help finalize this task In the fourth quarter.
100.0
90.0 ❑95-95 Budget
80.0 1113rd Qtr.Actual
r
70.0
60.0 50
50.0 37 35 14
40.0 25.7 30
30.0 20.01) 20.022.1 21.620.3 --
20.0 9.0 1D 17.7 12 3
10.0 ,12
0.-
M�M Pis NYa qamxv, Piev-awe CmeeNe p1B-°°� Pimem�re spoil
I �OaM%fro MMtl MVM MavrtBxM%9 Equip Men! aepvW
etltle8 LamMnnWC
XWO a %1.a]J laeMuCba
W
Section 6 - Page 10
L
r
Activity Trends
Mechanical Maintenance
A major goal of the Division for FV 1995.96 is the emphasis on the development of the Computerized Maintenance Management System
we (CMMS)database and its requisite Inventory items. Approximately 63%of the annual target for"Pieces of Equipment.Computerized"has been
maintained through the first nine months. The Division is In the process of completing cross training of all field level staff and is 75%complete.
Preventive maintenance tasks completed are within targeted parameters and we have considerably improved.our The corrective maintenance
backlog when compared against estimated annual Activity Trend projections have experienced an increase due to CMMS reporting. The
Division has maimalned a 12%vacancy rate in order to meet the 10%reduction in the Joint Operating Expense budget.
r
60.0 096-96 Budget 75.0
70.0 111113rd Qtr.Actual 62.7
we 60.0
60.0 38.6
40.0 35.0
r �'3 27.0 250
30.0 22.3
17.5 20.7 15 17.1
20.0
10.0
r
0.0
Preventive Corrective Preventive Corrective Pieces of Computerized
Maintenance Tasks Maintenance Maintenance Maintenance Equipment Preventive
r Completed Tasks Backlog Backlog in Computer Maintenance
X 100 Campletetl X 10 X 10 Database Instructions
X 100 X 100 X 100
r Electrical Maintenance:
A major goal of the Division for FT 1995.96 is the emphasis an the continued development of the Computerized Maintenance Management
System(CMMS)Database and Its requisite Inventory items. Approximately 97%of the annual target for'Pieces of Equipment-Computerized"
,r has been achieved thus far. The expansion of this Database has resulted In an increase in the quantity of maintenance items coming due for
PM. Although preventive maintenance backlog has remained relatively constant,the PM tasks completed category has risen sharpty during
the quarter due to the sh10 in resources from Database development to PM tasks. Furthermore,efforts to complete the inventory database
required a shift in resources resulting in lower production in the Preventive Tasks Completed category. Corrective tasks completed are well
r within targeted parameters for the year and we are within the estimated annual Activity Trend projections for corrective maintenance backlog.
The Division continues to maintain a 100A vacancy rate in staffing levels that will not be filled this fiscal year.
120 09546 Budget 112.7
11113re Qtr.Actual
r 100
BD 65
5 80 77.3
r 60 55
J'[3W
40
35.0 32.5 35.2
20.0 18.1
r 20
0
PreVatbtiva Coned. Preventative Pieces of Preventative
weMNmananro Tasks Maintenance Maintenance comongve Equip Melntmumce
completed Tasks Completed Backlog Maintenance computemat Inabunoons
X100 X100 x10 Barking X1ao Cemputer@e0
x 100
Section 6 - Page 11
1995-96 3rd Qtr Report
r
Inshamentatlon Maintenance.,
A major goal of the Division for F1'1995-96Is the emphasis on the conUnued development of the Computerized Maintenance Management
System(CMMS)database and its requisite inventory dams. Approximately 109%of the annual target for'Piecas of Equipment-Computerized* Y.I
has been achieved the thbd quarter. Because of the development of new fadlltles,our Inventory has Increased and thus exceeded initial Activity
Trend estimates in this category. During the third quarter,manpower resources have been shifted from database development to preventive and
cormctive backlogs. This shift has resulted In a redudlon of backlog In both categodes and a significant incmase in PM tasks completed.The
corrective maintenance tasks completed category is on target with Advity Trend projections. The Division has maintained a 10%vacancy rah W
whlch will not be filled this fiscal year.
jsal
120.0 096-96 Budget 103.6 is
100.0
■3rd Qtr.Actual 97.0 95.0
80.0 850 77.3
1W.0
80.0
40.0 30.7 37.5 34.3
20.0F 12.0 11.5 ywj
0.0 . I
praventM correNva prevemrve Cvrecttve Pkmaor computemed
Mehreamn Talks MelnM1reme Melnte". MalnMrance Equipment Preventive j
cmrgland Talks eaddog BeddaO In Compuiw MaintenanceIwl
x1a0 compiesexlao X10 Database X 100 Insbuctiorwx 100
kad
Lai
V
L
W
IL
W
V
Section 6 - Page 12
r
Activity Trends
r
Plant Operations:
Activity trends for the first nine months of FY 1995-96(ending March 311 are generally tracking as expected when compared against
r 105-96 annual estimates. Actual expenditures for chemicals are below annual trends as are plant operations cost(per MGD).
Lower per unit wets for caustic soda and hydrogen peroxide were achieved by price negotiations with vendom. Actual plant
operation division coat of$240 per million gallons is approximately 10%below the annual estimate of$265 per million gallons.
a. Budget savings have been realized through the aforementioned unit costs on chemicals and staff vacancies which resulted in labor
savings.
r
r
90.0 61.0
D 95-96 Budget
KC73.8 1113rd Ob.Actual
70.0
60.0 $54.3
50.0 41.6 42.6 41.0
r 40.0 37.3
$29.7
30.0 23.7 29.6 $26.5$24A
20.0
10.0
0.0
Influent Flow In Biosolida Enemv Ilsese in kW z 100 Chemical Plant Operation
Tens of Millions Production Costa Division Cost
of Gallons in Pounds per Plant One Plant Two X100,000 Per Million Gallons
Per Day Million Gallons X 10
x 100
r
r
r
r
Section 6 -Page 13
r
,r
1995-96 3rd Qtr Report
Environmental Management.
The Ocean Monitoring Baseline Program is a fixed-price contract worth$1.49 million that extends Into FY 1996-97 and will not be
fully expanded until that time. Charges Invoiced during the first nine months total-$571,000. The target number of Amid samples u
collected during the year for the baseline Ocean Monitoring Program(OMP)is 1284 samples of which 1210(93%)were collected
during the first nine months of the fiscal year. Typically,the bulk of collection is accomplished in mid-summer,or during the fat
quarter of the fiscal year. The inability to coiled 100%of the target number of samples was due to the Iola of three field samples W
and the lack of target aquatic species for appropriate testing. Each year the Districts contribute funds to the Southern California
Coastal Water Research Project(SCCWRP)under a joint-powers agreement. Approximately 50%has been expended. One of the
special studies conducted by Environmental Management B the charededzation of water quality within our study area utilizing a
Find grid of 32 stations. Water quality samples taken are on target Vr
L
i
6J
400.0 384
i
3KID W
095-96 Budget $310.0 ._
300.0 N3ro Qtr.Actual 263
$245.0
250.0
20D.0 W
$148.6 150.1
150.0 128.4 121.0
4
10D.0 $85.1
$57.1
50.0 W
.0
Ocean SCCWRP Joint Ocean Monitoring Water Oualdy
Ocean Monitoring Monitoring Powers Agreement Special Studies Samples Taken LI
Baseline Program Samples Contribution Cost
X 10,000 X 10 X1,000 X 1.000
W
L
L
I
la4
4
Section 6 - Page 14
L
r
Activity Trends
r
Environmental Sciences Laboratory.,
The Activity Trends noted In the FY 1995-98 Budget do not adequately quantity the duties and responsibilities of the Environmental
'r Sciences Laboratory(ESL). As a result,we are modVng our reporting to better reflect lab operations. The Information below
depicts the actual number of analyses(through February) to be completed divided by the estimated number of analyses. Results
greater than 100%indicate the lab has performed more analyses than initial estimates while numbers below 100%indicate
r performance less than estimates. Overall,sample load is tracking within 5%of projected,but significant reductions am seen In both
source control and marine monitoring. These may be due to the baseline data benchmarks taken from the time period July 1995-
October 1995. Special project samples ere 10.7%greater than projected due primarily to increases In process Improvement projects
in plant operations.
ae
120.0% 110.7%
s 100.0% 100.5% 103.5%
89.4%
96.4% 96.1% 93,5%
33.9%
80.0%
60.0%
r 40.0%
20.0%
r
0.0%
IM/EF So. P.. ffi f s M. Sxxt u Nr su
NPDM coM C. MonlorMB Pro.,
r
Source Control:
The new and renewed permit issuance activity is 51%of the budgeted item due to pemlil renewals which are lower during the first
half of every fiscal year. The routine sampling and Inspection of factl@ies are 69%of the benchmark and are well within the
expected trend. The downstream surveillance and Strike Force activities are at 93%of the annual estimate due to the Increased
need for further investigation of illegal dischargers. Enforcement actions are 67%ofthe activity trend benchmark. Remaining
activity trends portrayed are within the expected range of variabibly.
r
300.0 095-96 Budget 266.8
r 250.0 03rd Otr.Actual
182.0 88.1 200.0 163.6
r 150.0 12.6 118
95.6
100.0 76.0 50•8 79
42.039.1
r 50,0 24.024.0
0.0
Newend Routlne fiemplin9 end Oawnabaam E =MBM FreboabrleM Pen rypg Regulation
I� � ts ftnrh�ENon4 6urveianres, A�osloade � Eric 0 Small
0wntry,
PomMe permiRtl0 chargers 6Mx Force Oreen nGeneral Dischargers
luu� x10 %10 Cbaeapnndenp ryes
x to
Section 6 - Page 15
1995-96 3rd Qtr Report
Engineering Administration:
The original Capital Outlay Revolving Fund(CORF)forecast was$33.5 million of which$27.4 million was the direct responsibility _
of the Engineering Department. This$27.4 million budget has now been revised to$19 million through June 30, 1996 due to
several factors. The primary factor is that several projects had been delayed including the primary rehabilitation projects and the
Plant 2 Maintenance Building. The Plant 2 Warehouse has been canceled,and budgets for some projects have been revised
downward to more accurately reflect estimates of construction costs. Through the third quarter,we have expended 65 k of the
revised budget.
30 $27.4
25
20 $16$12.4
095-96 Budget
■95-96 Projected 15
■3rd Qtr.Actual
10
5
0
C.O.R.F.Expenditures
(in millions)
Design Engineering:
The number of connection permits issued as well as number of design submittals reviewed represents fluctuating woddoad and
contractor preferences that do not hold to predictable quarterly patterns. The number of connection permits issued exceed nine
month estimates while submittals reviewed are less than nine month estimates. The number of Capital Outlay Revolving Fund
(CORF)projects bid this fiscal year is in line with the estimate. Because the projects were bid later than anticipated the expected
submittal load has shifted to a later period, Major collection projects(by individual district)have been delayed to accommodate city ..
projects such that none will be bid this fiscal year.
156.0
160
140
120 095-96 Budget
■3N Qtr.Actual
100
so
60 40 39
35.0
40
6 14
20 2 0
0 �
No.of Connedicn No.of Submittals Budgeted CORF Budgeted
Permits Issued Reviewed! Projects Bid Collection
x 10 Projects Bid
Section 6 - Page 16
r
Activity Trends
r
Engineering Planning
Punier review of me FY 1995-96 Budget Acclivity trends resulted In additional quantification of activities. The development of the Strategic
r Plan was assigned to the Engineering Planning Division In July,1996.Dud the first six months,the components 9 9 g Y Metdate
o/the plan were developed
and the ground work laid for phase implamentatlon. A scope o/work and schedule were adopted and a taiga[tlale M 1/96 set for completion
of the new Strategic Plan, Phose I Is underway and includes three projects:the rehabilitation of our existing ocean ounell,a study on
hydraulic requirements,and a study to determine the most equitable capital and user charge system. The Board of Directors approved
Professional Services Agreements In the third quarter for the Phase 1 work. The Phase 2 wodc will start In the fourth quarter of 1995-96.
r 199 -1-6 998
� Iw
i
ms9 mW Bite aw Ba& mW
r emav saasov spIDa seen asps sours
Construction Management
The amount budgeted for CORP engineering construction projects in the fire[nine months is slightly low compared to the FY 1995-95 budget.
This was due to the uncertainty surrounding the County bankruptcy and the ultimate delay of projects. Our change orders am below annual
estimates due to aforementioned project delays as wall as improved project planning.
r
r
$20.0 $19.1
095-96 Budget
r $15.0 .4 09 Months Ended
$12
$10.0
r
5.0
$5.0 2.7%
r
CORP Dollar Amount of
r Constmclion Change Orders as a
Projects %of Construction Contract
Section 6 - Page 17
r
�I
�I
�I
This page was intentionally left blank
W
IW
iLd
fV
ILi
IW
61
Section 6 -Page 18
r
Project Tracking
r
Districts Wide Measurement Tracking
r
102 Measurement Projects
r
70
r 60
49
50
r `oE 40
C
so
20A
6 19
r 9
10
1 2
JmOL
Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled
r As part of the fiscal year 1995-96 budget process, performance measurement projects were
established for all departments/divisions within the organization. The chart above shows a status
summary, as of the end of the first quarter, of all the performance measurement projects approved in
.. the 1995-96 budget document.
The following pages present a status of each departments/divisions performance measures as of the
r end of the first quarter.
r
r
r
r
Section 7 -Page 1
r
W
1995-96 3rd Quarter Report
W
Executive Management
9 Measurement Projects
W
a u
e I
7 W
a
8 5 y
a
V
3
2 W
i
o V
Ahead On Track Done Behind On Hold
W
Measurement Me %complete Slatus start !rM _
Complete Consolidation Study. a5% On Hold 711/95
Improve management skills of managers and supemburs. 85% On Track 711/95
Support Boards consideration of committee structure change. 100% Done 7/1195 12131/95 -
Represent Districts'interests in Orange County bankruptcy. 90% On Track 7H/95 - .i
W
Improve agency communication. 75% On Track 7/1/95 -
Dirsct work on Districts'Strategic Plan. 10% On Track 7/1/95 -
Create climate that promotes change. 75% On Track 7/1195 - W
Establish clear goals for the departments and all subordinate units. 100% Done 711/95 12/31/95
Renew NPDES ocean discharge permit. 50% Behind 7/1/95 -
W
W
W
W
Section 7 - Page 2
u
Project Tracking
Board Secretary
2 Measurement Projects
s 2 _
n
E
f
r 0 —
Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled
r Measurement Tide %Complete Status Start End
Streamline procedures for preparing agenda and minutes. 75% On Track 711/95 -
Provide regular updates of Director Info.to mgmt.and Committee secr. 75% On Track 7/1195 -
Communications
4 Measurement Projects
V✓
4 —
Sk 3
3 2
r 2 1
0
Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled
r
Measurement Title %Complete Status Start End
Establish and organize Communications OMce. 100% Done 711195 imi/95
r
Define Communications Office Mission 8 develop work plan. 100% Done 7/1/95 12131/95
Prepare Communications Once Procedures Manuel. 0% Canceled 7/1/95 -
ar Develop a biannual publication for public officials and comm.leaders. 0% Canceled 12/31/09 -
r
Section 7 - Page 3
r
1995-96 3rd Quarter Report
W
Finance Administration
4 Measurement Projects LW
4 Ir
ed3
a ¢ 2 W
E �
f I
0
Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hald Canceled
Measurement Title %Complete Status Start End W
Replace variable rate bonowing remarketing agent to mduco casts. 100% Done 7/1/95 12/31/95
Complete Implementation of treasury management functions. 100% Done 711/95 12/31/95
Provide safe,liquid and productive cash and Investment program. 100% Dane 1/1195 9/30195 W
Improve comprehensive budget process started In 1994-95. 90% On Track 7/1196 6MO196 --
Accounting
3 Measurement Projects u
V
3 E@� it
E n 1
a
Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled
W
Measurement Title %Complete Status Start End
Oversee the acquisition of a new Integrated Financial Info.System. 75% On Track 711195 6/30196
W
Develop DlsUlgs'-wide Finance policy 8 procedure manual. 25% Behind 7/1/95 4I30/96
Develop Dismcts'-wide comprahensNe budget manual. 100% Dane 7/l/95 12/31/95 -
W
W
Section 7 -Page 4
W
Project Tracking
r
Purchasing & Warehousing
4 Measurement Projects
r
r
4
5 3
r. E E 2
:11 ,
S
r 0
Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled
r Measurement Title %Complete Status Start End
Compete revision of bidders list applic.to tie to commodity code luting. 85% On Hold 711195 1131196
Establish annual contracts to reduce need for in-house Inventory. 10% Behind 7/lt95 3131/g6
Establish ABC analysis for classifying and analyzing Inventory. 80% Behind 1/1/g5 3/31196
Develop policy on removal of mist low coal hardware from inventory. 10% Behind 7/l/95 12/31/95
r
Information Technology Administration
4 Measurement Projects
4
`o E 3
8 e 2
E
ll 1
d all
0
Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled
r
Measurement TlBe %Complete Status Start End
Develop Information Systems Master Plan 0% On Hold 7/1/95
r
Develop Performance Measurement survey for IT Department users. 100% Done 7/1/95 -
Obtain adequate working space for IT Department staff. 5% On Track 7/1/95 -
CreateformalPoliciesandProceduresManual for IT Department. 0% Behind VIM -
r
Section 7 - Page 5
W
1995-96 3rd Quarter Report
W
Hardware Support
3 Measurement Projects
u
3
8
`0 2
E -
e y 1
z m
s
0 u
Ahead On Trade Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled
Measurement Title %Complete Statute Start End W
Install auxiliary PBX for Plant 2 to provide added telephone capabllaies. 100% Done 7/1195 12f3195
Implement Ethernet throughout Dismcls 80% Behind 71195 1/31198
Implement Districts wide integrated network for timely,accurate and coal- 0% Not Started 1/1/95 6/30196 W
effective sharing and analysis of databases.
W
Software & Plant Automation
4 Measurement Projects W
W
4
`o Epm3 W
Ea 2
3i
0
Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Haut Canceled
W
Measurement Tide %Complete Status Start End
Extend CMMS application to include data for Warehouse and Auto shop. 0% On Hold 7/195 -
Software support for installation and implementation of new integrated FIS. 0% On Hold 7H95 -
Replace Plant Automaton System at Plant 2 with new technology 60% On track 71195 armor -
InstallDislnctawideintegratednetwodx. 1% Behind 7/1/95 W30MS L
W
I.0
Section 7 -Page 6
r
Project Tracking
r
Human Resources Administration
3 Measurement Projects
we
9
r 2 — — -
� 1
0
Ahead On Track Dow Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled
Measurement TlNa %Complete Status Start End
Develop and Implement a DMttlda-wide training program. 80% On Track 7/1/95 -
Develop and publish an Employee Handbook. 100% Done 711195 4115195
Improve the Quality of the Management Performance Review Prog rem. 85% On Track 712/95 5130195
r
Human Resources & Training
3 Measurement Projects
3
rl
r m 2
E
a 1
2 0
r 0
Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled
Measurement Title %CMPIMe SMas Start End
Develop and implement training opportunities and programs. 50% On Trade 711/95 -
r Improve and refine management and professional staff evaluations. 85% On Track 711195 -
CondudDistrtds-wide attitude survey. 100% Done 711/95 11/30/95
Safety & Emergency Response
3 Measurement Projects
r
8 3 —
o c
m 2
z
� 0
Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled
Measurement Tide %Complete Status Start End
r Develop safety training programs based on needs assessment. 100% Done 711/95 ID31/95
Develop and implement an Integrated Emergency Response Plan. 10% On Track 711195
Conduct industrial hygiene evaluations to determine hazards. 0% On Hold 711/95
Section 7 - Page 7
r
1995-96 3rd Quarter Report
u
Maintenance Administration
3 Measurement Projects
I
3 — W
fl
o E 2
E W
E � t
f
0 — W
Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled
Measurement Tide %Complete Status start End v
Emphasize preventive maintenance we"to reduce Ida cycle costs. 85% On Track 7/1195 -
Implement remaining Ernst&Young O&M recommendations. 70% Ahead 711/95 -
Continuebulldingthecomputerdatabasetartha CMMS. 85% On Track 1/1/95 - W.0
w
Maintenance Scheduling
2 Measurement Projects W
W
2
`ko E W
E E 1
E � -
2 rt
f
0
Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled
w
Measurement Tide %Complete Statue Start End
Identify optimum preventive maintenance rates to reduce costa. 50% On Track 7/1195 -
Benchmark equipment dmn time and establish acceptable targets. 50% On Track 7/1195 -
i
l�
Ili
W
Section 7 - Page 8 --
r
Project Tracking
r
Plant Maintenance
r
4 Measurement Projects
r
2
8E
fige 1
z
f
r 0
Mead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled
r Measurement Tilde %Complete Status Start End
Develop a valve exerolaing plant maintenance program. 40% On Track 7/t195 W0/96
Develop a valve change plant maintenance program for critical areas. 15% Behind 711195 6/30/96
r Investigate applicable certification programs for the various crafts. 25% On Track 7/1195 SM96
Develop an area assignment sys.to leverage field crew resources. 20% Behind 7/1195 6I30/95
r
Collection Facilities Maintenance
r 4 Measurement Projects
r
4
r � EEe3
8 C 2
a +
r z � 1
0
Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled
r
Mamuremenl TNle %Complete Status Start End
Develop a CMMS data base for pump stations 5 a plant main.fisting. 70% On Track 7/1/95 6/30196
r Continue to investigate alternate chemicals for cheaper odor control. 60% On Track 7/1195 -
Contract for line cleaning in some of the Districts'Assmt.Districts. 60% Behind 7/1195 6/30/96
,r Expand a root control program for District No.7 sewer system. 60% Behind 711195 1/31196
r
r
Section 7 -Page 9
r
L
1995-96 3rd Quarter Report
u
Mechanical Maintenance
3 Measurement Projects
6d
3
a
8 m 2
8e u
E m t
z m
SEVE
0
Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled
Measurement Tide %Complete Status Start End W
Initiate tracking program for repaliive breakdowns of digester pumps. 50% On Track 711196 6/30/98
Reduce costs by expanding central generation engines malmenance. 75% Ahead 7/1195 -
Stan=ss training of personnel between plants. 50% On Track 711195 - V
Li
Electrical Maintenance
4 Measurement Projects I6w
1
LI
4
`o m 3 V
B 2 2
E
z 1 6w
0 _
Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled
kW
Measurement Tide %Complete Status start End
Complete CMMS database with regard to A/C systems. 100% Dane 711/95 2128/96
Develop a predictive maint.program for electric equipment. 80% Ahead 7/1/95 3131/96 W
Develop a 12-Kilovolt meter and relay database. 95% Ahead 711/95 6/30196 -
Privat¢a Central Generation Generator Maintenance to reduce Coats. 100% Done 711/95 11/30/95
W
L
LI
Section 7 - Page 10 -
L
r
Project Tracking
Instrumentation Maintenance
3 Measurement Projects
d 3
9
`002
r a E
] Nt
2 0
f
d 0
Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled
d Measurement TlOe %Complete Status Start End
Develop activity codes within CMMS to track staff efforts. 15% On Track 711/95 W30195
Privatize maintenance services for the 13 Influent flow meters. 95% Behind 7/1195 3131/96
r Develop a charting process for recording preventative main.backlog. 90% Behind 711/95 1/31196
r
Technical Services Administration
4 Measurement Projects
4
r 'o 3
S22
E �
Z w
0
Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled
r
Measurement Title %Complete Status start End
Improve coverage of legislation&Improve assmt of compliance regs. 100% Done 7/1195 12131/95
Develop Imprvmnt.teems&begin Implementing EV recommendations, 75% On Track 7/1/95 6130/96
Develop compliance eHnht.on discharges from treatment plants. 15% On Hold 7/1/95 6130196
,r Standardize blosollds Inspection protocols&optimize staff usage. 75% Behind 711/95 3131/96
r
Section 7 -Page 71
L
1995-96 3rd Quarter Report
L
Environmental Management
3 Measurement Projects
I�
3 W
m
� E 2
a° @ LW
E m 1
z o
S
0
Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled
Measurement Tdie %Complete Status Stan End y
Develop a 10-year synthesis of ocean monitoring program findings. 10% Behind 7H/95 2/28M
Conduct a study of biotddding fitters for the removal of pollutants. 90% Behind 711/95 2/28/98
Prepare a 1995 Air Tonics Emission Inventory Plan and Report. 70% Behind 7/V95 2/28/98
W
Environmental Sciences Laboratory
3 Measurement Projects W
I
u
3
5 2 W
z ES t
A- Ir1
0
Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled I
W
Measurement Title %Complete statue start End
Develop expanded air analysis capabilities 30% On Track 7/1/g5 -
Reduce labor costs for metals analyses of wastewater. 10% On Track 7/1195 W
Reduce labor costs for organic analyses of wastewater. 10% On Track 7/1195 - I-
IW
W
W
Section 7 • Page 12
L;
Project Tracking
Source Control
3 Measurement Projects
r
3
8EE 2
r $ p
i1
r n
Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled
y Measurement Tme %Complete Stehre start End
Evaluate the EPA Effluent Guidelines for regulating industrial users. 75% On Track 7/1/95 6130/96
Finalize the resuhs of the non-Industrial source sampling. 60% On Track 7/1195 6/30196
Develop a program to regulate small-quamily dischargers. 70% On Track 7/1195 6130196
ti Operations Administration
3 Measurement Projects
r
3
€ 2
a @
0
1
r Z �
0
Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled
ra
Measurement Title %Complete Status Start End
Reduced natural gas cost. NA On Track 7/1195 6/30/96
rr Increase stastraining. 100% Done 711195 6n0/96
Improve employee communications. 100% Done 711/95 6/30196
r
r
r
r✓
Section 7 - Page 13
u
1995-96 3rd Quarter Report
W
Plant Operations
4 Measurement Projects
Ir
4 — W
0 3
a p 2
E
2v1
f
0
Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled
Measurement Title %Complete SlaNs Start End
Study staffing productivity per Ernst B Young review. 50% On Track 7/1195 Reduce overtime. NIA On Track 7/1195 -
RunTreatmentplantcost-effectively. N/A On Track 711/95 - W
Reduce biosoads disposal cost. NIA On Track 7/2/95
h.rl
Engineering Administration L
2 Measurement Projects
60
2
1
w
0
Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled
OW
Measurement Title %Complete Status Start End
Motllfy Planning S Design organization for E 8 Y recommendations 50% On Track 7/1195 6/301W L
Implement all 14 recommendations In CIP Report 30% On Track 711195 -
I�
W
W
Section 7 - Page 14
Project Tracking
Design Engineering
5 Measurement Projects
5
� a
`oi
s B E 3
rm2
2 A
f 1
d 0
Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled
Measurement This %Complete Status Start End
Complete 75%of Conn permits in lday,90%in 3 days,100%in 5 100% On Track 7/1/95 6130/96
r Design facilRies which satisfy customer N/A On Track 7/1195 6/30/96
Track and manage$33.5 million CORF project budget N/A Behind 7/1196 61=96
Comply with adopted Master Plan N/A On Track 7/1195 6130/96
.+ Improve submittal process on all new design projects 80% On Track 711195 6/30196
Engineering Planning
3 Measurement Projects
3
9
Sm2 --
a E
d E
Z n 1
b
QEAI I
Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled
Measurement Tide %Complete Status Start End
Complywdh adopted Master Plan 75% On Track 7/1195 6130195
Track and manage budget and schedule 75% On Trade 711195 6130196
Update"as-built"information 75% On Track 711195 6/30/96
Section 7 - Page 15
L
1995-96 3rd Quarter Report
I
6w
Construction Management
3 Measurement Projects j
4 L
� 3
2 - I.
i1
0 LJ
Mead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled
Moasurement TlBe %Complete Status Start End W
Revise the record drawing process of new construction projects. 75% On T.& 7/1195 -
Improve shop drewings submission process on all construction projects. 75% On Track 711195 -
Keep construction staff up to date on building code and standards 75% On Tack 711195 - Abd
i
W
L
L
I
IW
W
1
6w
L
Intl
Section 7- Page 16
L
I
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of Orange County, California
Finance Department
Accounting Division
(714) 962-2411
mailing address:
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California
92728-8127
street address:
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
9 2 708-701 8
CSDOC 03196
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
MAY 22, 1996
Agenda Item (16): Consideration of the following actions re Bayside
Drive Pump Station Sewage Spill on February 22,
1996:
(a) Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Report dated May 15, 1996.
(b) Consideration of motion to receive and file Administrative Civil Liability
Complaint No. 96-3 issued by California Regional Water Quality Control
Board, Santa Ana Region, relative to the Bayside Drive Pump Station
Sewage Spill on February 22, 1996.
Summary
As you may know, the Districts has received a Complaint from the Santa Ana Regional Water
Quality Control Board (RWQCB) assessing Administrative Civil Liability for the sewage spill on
February 22, 1996, which resulted from the failure at the Bay Bridge Pump Station. The
Complaint charges the Districts with violating the California Water Code and provisions of our
NPDES (National Pollution Discharge Elimination System) ocean discharge permit by spilling
sewage into homes and into Newport Bay. A maximum fine of$410,000 was possible under the
provisions of the Water Code, but the RWQCB assessed a fine of$50,000. In determining the
amount of the fine, the RWQCB took into consideration the Districts' long history of outstanding
compliance, the Districts' response to the residents who were affected, and other factors
allowed by the Water Code. Staff discussions between the two agencies Indicated that the
RWQCB's most significant concern was that the Districts' staff did not take immediate action
after receiving the alarm from the pump station; something they felt could be indicative of
inadequate training. The Districts has addressed this issue in its follow-up with the RWQCB.
A hearing on the Complaint is scheduled for the RWQCB's regular meeting on May 21, 1996.
The Complaint allows the Districts to waive the hearing by paying the fine before May 17. Staff
believe that the Complaint and the amount of the fine are reasonable, indeed very low, given the
seriousness of the spill. Nevertheless, staff was uncomfortable recommending payment of the
fine in order to avoid the hearing. If there are members of the public who wish to address the
RWQCB on the matter, preventing the hearing will leave those people without an opportunity to
participate in the process. While the public can submit written comments without a hearing,
those comments would not be considered by the RWQCB in a public forum. Joint Board Chair
Cox and the General Manager decided that the Districts should not waive the opportunity for a
public hearing. Staff will be present at the hearing to discuss the seriousness of the incident
and indicate that the Districts do not oppose either the substance of the Complaint or the
amount of the fine. Staff will also respond to questions from the RWQCB and the public if
appropriate.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends to receive and file Staff Report dated May 15, 1996 and to receive and file
Administrative Civil Liability Complaint No. 96-3 issued by California Regional Water Quality
Control Board, Santa Ana Region, relative to the Bayside Drive Pump Station Sewage Spill on
February 22, 1996.
5/15/96
JAWPDOMMAGDOWY 8 Aa
H
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
MAY 22, 1996
Agenda Item (17): FAHR96-25: Consideration of actions relative to
introduction of proposed Ordinances increasing sewer
connection fees and annexation fees.
Summary:
Al the April Joint Boards meeting, the Directors approved the Finance Administration and Human
Resources Committee recommendation to increase capital facilities connection fees and annexation
fees for 1996-97.
At the meeting, the Committee Chair reported that each property connected to a sewer system in
each of the Districts, except District No. 14, pays an annual sewer use fee which partially
finances operating, maintenance and replacement (OM&R) costs used to fund sewerage system
improvements. (Properties in District No. 14 are billed by the IRWD.) Each of those Districts,
except District No. 13, also receives a share of the ad valorem property tax which is applied to
debt service. New development must pay a one-time sewer connection fee which finances
capital expansion of the sewerage system. Again, District No. 14 is the exception because
IRWD pays its share of capital expansion. One-time annexation fees are charged to the owners
of properties who desire to become a part of the Districts to receive sewerage service.
The District Resolutions and Ordinances governing the fees provide for an annual adjustment
based upon changes in an Enaineerina News-Record - Los Angeles Construction Cost Index
(ENRLA) from year-to-year. In the case of capital facilities connection fees, the proposed fees
for each District will be $2,360 per residential unit, an increase of $10; and $472 per 1,000
square feet of commercialfindustrial development, an increase of $2 per 2,000 square feet.
Only District Nos. 2, 3, 4, 7 and 11 have territories within their spheres of influence which could
annex in order to receive sewerage service.
Each District has a unique annexation fee based upon its individual financial situation. The fees
range from $3,159 per acre with a tax exchange agreement, to $6,407 per acre without. The
change in the ENRLA governing annexation fees was .2%, causing an increase of between $6
and $13 per acre.
Recommended Action
The increase in annexation fees is automatic in Districts 2, 3, 5, 7 and 11 and no action is required.
As advised last month, the connection fee increase is subject to the Ordinance process. Tonight is
the first step in that process with the "first reading." If approved, the Ordinance will be returned next
month for final adoption.
J iW P o oC193 W a99VNMV9a6.17
a
�m
April 10, 1996
Revised May 14, 1996
STAFF REPORT
FAHR96-25: 1996-97 Sewer Use, Connection Fee, and Annexation Fee
Recommendations
Surnma
Each property connected to a sewer system in each of the Districts, except District No.
14, pays an annual sewer use fee which partially finances operating, maintenance and
replacement (OM&R) costs used to fund sewerage system improvements. (Properties
in District No. 14 are billed by the IRWD.) Each of those Districts, except District No.
13, also receives a share of the ad valorem property tax which is applied to debt
service. New development must pay a one-time sewer connection fee which finances
capital expansion of the sewerage system. Again, District No. 14 is the exception
because IRWD pays its share of capital expansion.
For the last four years, because of the poor economic climate, staff recommended and
the Boards agreed not to increase user or connection fees over the 1991-92 rates. In
order to do this, certain Districts' programs have been scaled back.
Subsequent to the 1992-93fee adoption, the Governor and State Legislature
confiscated a portion of the Districts' property taxes and shifted them to help finance
schools. After lengthy deliberations, the Boards of Districts 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 and 7
concluded that they had no really viable alternative but to increase the user fees to
make up for the confiscation of 1992-93 property taxes by the state. The total amount
shifted by the state was $3.5 million.
Although the Districts have the ability to increase fees to pay for the rising costs of
wastewater services, the staff is sensitive to the continuing economic situation and the
very difficult financial problems our member agencies are struggling with.
The General Manager has directed staff to prepare a budget for 1996-97 that will allow
sewer use fees not to be increased. These are the same rates adopted for 1995-96.
BACKGROUND
During the 1980's and early 1999s, each of the Districts was required to consider the
adoption of a sewer use fee for ongoing operations, maintenance and rehabilitation
C800C 0 P.O.Box 6127 0 Founhln Valley.CA 92728-8127 0 (714)962-2411
FAHR96-25
Page 2
April 10, 1996
costs. Although property taxes, connection fees and federal and state construction
grants had historically been the major sources of financing of Districts' activities, they
became inadequate during the past decade. After the passage of Proposition 13, all ad
valorem property tax revenue has been used in the Operating Funds for maintenance,
operations and rehabilitation. Beginning in 1991-92, ad valorem property tax receipts
were dedicated to be first used to repay the principal and interest due for COP issues.
No property tax revenue has been directly available for capital improvements. The
costs of providing service have risen beyond the ability of the property tax
apportionments to keep pace with the increasingly stringent requirements of the federal,
state and regional regulatory agencies for wastewater treatment to protect public health
and the environment.
In addition to new regulatory requirements, cost increases are also attributable to
inflation, and to additional flows generated by the natural population increases from the
excess of births over deaths and in-migration and additional residential, commercial and
industrial development. Federal and state assistance from the clean water grant
program has essentially been eliminated by Congress because of federal funding
problems.
All Districts except Nos. 13 and 14 currently receive a reduced historical allocation of
the 1% basic property tax levy equal to approximately 2.7% of the 1% basic levy. The
typical property owner pays $27 per year in property taxes to the Districts. District No.
13 is fully funded by user fees and District No. 14 is fully funded by the IRWD.
FUTURE FINANCING PROJECTIONS
As a part of the rate setting process, staff has analyzed statements of Projected Cash
Flows for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13 prepared in accordance with the
adopted "2020 VISION" Financial Plan recommendations, adjusted to reflect changing
circumstances. Under the Plan, each District's share of the treatment plant
construction, and its respective trunk sewer construction projects are to be financed by
a combination of increased connection fees to pay for new capacity and borrowing to
pay for rehabilitation and improved treatment. Debt retirement and operating and
maintenance costs are to be paid by a combination of property taxes and the annual
sewer use fees, under the following assumptions:
1. Renewal of NPDES Permit and Continuation of Current Treatment Levels
(301(h) Waiver)
This scenario represents the minimum probable level of construction,
rehabilitation and operations and maintenance costs, while the new Strategic Plan
is being developed. For the first five years of the planning period, the differences
between renewal of our existing permit and full secondary treatment are not
FAHR96-25
Page 3
April 10, 1996
significant. Increased annual flow projections and new sewer service connections
have been revised downward from the 1989 Master Plan to reflect current and
expected economic development and levels of flow in accordance with 1994
engineering study.
2. Connection Fees
The capital facilities connection fee includes the cost of future and existing
facilities on a per unit basis. The reason to include future costs is that any new
flow will require new, additional facilities and capacity.
The Board-approved connection fee policy provides for an automatic annual
adjustment of fees to reflect changes in the Engineering News Record-LA
construction cost index. These fees have not been increased since 1991-92.
Connection fees are uniform throughout the Districts. Staff is recommending that
the fees for 1996-97 increase from the 1995-96 rates of$2,350 per residential unit
and $470 per 1,000 square feet of floor area for non-residential properties, in
accordance with Board policy. Based upon the actual increase in the ENRLA
index, the new fees would be $2,360 per residential unit and $472 per 1,000
square feet of non-residential buildings.
3. Debt/Borrowina
Through 1998-99, all of the Districts except Nos. 13 and 14 are expected to issue
additional COP-type debt to meet a portion of Joint Works treatment facilities
improvements. Borrowing has been a part of the long-range financial plan for
capital improvements since 1979 when the policy of using all property tax
revenues for operations, maintenance and rehabilitation was implemented.
Extensive use of the now discontinued federal and state Clean Water Grant
Program enabled the Districts to stretch out their reserves and other income and
to generally avoid borrowing until 1990. Three primary reasons to issue debt are:
to protect and to preserve capital reserves; to avoid major increases and
fluctuations in user fees from year-to-year; and to spread the cost of facilities over
their useful lives.
The preliminary cash flow projections include additional COP issues that will be
required to meet capital project award and cash flow requirements through
1998-99. Any COP issue will need to be approved by the Boards. No COPS are
expected to be issued until the completion of the Strategic Plan.
FAHR96-25
Page 4
April 10, 1996
4. Reserves
As a part of the financial plan developed by the team of Directors, staff and
consultants, the Boards have implemented a plan to build reserves for certain
future events. The current reserve policy calls for Dry Period Funding Reserves,
Contingency Reserves, Capital Project Reserves, Insurance Reserves,
Environmental Requirement Reserves, and Debt Service Reserves. The
projected reserve levels have been allowed to decrease to coincide with the
reduced capital improvement budget projections.
5. Capital Improvement Projects
As the Directors are aware, the Districts are continuing to experience total flows
below those of previous years. This flow reduction and the economic climate
have caused staff to review the timing of the capital improvement program.
Projects for additional capacity and improved treatment are proposed to be
delayed, pending completion of the new Strategic Plan.
6. Ad Valorem Property Taxes
The cash flow projections are based on the continuing receipt of ad valorem
property taxes at the same level as allocated by the County for 1995-96.
1996-97 USER FEE AND CONNECTION FEE RECOMMENDATIONS
Taking all of the above assumptions into consideration and the current and projected
near-term economic climate, staff is again preparing an overall reduced budget. The
portion of each individual District's total operations, maintenance and COP service
budget, determined largely by the Joint Operating Fund budget to operate and maintain
the treatment and disposal facilities, is approximately 80%. Keeping this significant
portion of the operating budget constant and rescheduling certain capital projects,
thereby minimizing additional borrowing and subsequent repayment will allow the
Districts to maintain the 1995-96 user fee rates for 1996-97.
The following table shows the single-family residential annual user fee rates and
one-time connection fees for 1996-97 that were anticipated when last year's budget was
adopted, the predicted rates in the "2020 VISION" Master Plan, and the revised rates
now proposed.
A change to the one-time connection fee will require a new Ordinance to be adopted.
FAHR96-25
Page 5
April 10, 1996
SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL FEES
1996-97
Anticipated When Predicted
95-96Budget Was in
District Adopted - "2020 VISION" Proposed 96-97
1 $100.00 $125.00 $83.24
2 75.00 100,00 71.52
3 '75.00 126.00 73.89
5 - 100.00 125.00 96.75
6 80.00 100.00 76.47
7 52.00 75.00 50.09
11 72.00 175.00 60.00
13 100.00 165.00 100.00
Weighted Average •E $75.42 $113A5 $71 fie
All Districts • a -
Capital Fees R
Connection Fees `' $2,470.00 $3,020.00 $2,360
1996-97 ANNEXATION FEE RECOMMENDATIONS
One-time annexation fees are charged to owners of all properties who desire to annex
to the Districts to receive sewerage service. The fee is increased for those properties
for which a tax-exchange agreement cannot be negotiated with the County (a result of
Proposition 13/AB 8). The fees in effect for 1995-96 for those Districts with annexable
territory follow:
1995-96`Per Acre Annexation Fee'
W/Tax W/O Tax
District Exchange Exchange
2 $2,938 $3,929
3 3,171 4,161
5 3,071 4,106
7 2,918 3,904
IL-1 5 312 6 398
The annexation fee policy resolutions approved in 1991 provide for an automatic annual
FAHR96-25
Page 6
April 10, 1996
increase in the per acre fee on each July 1, based upon the change in the Engineering
News Record (ENR) Construction Cost index for the preceding March-to-March time
period. The intent of this section is to provide for automatic fee adjustments each year
to reflect the increasing costs of constructing sewerage facilities.
Based upon the actual .2% change in the ENR index March 1995 to March 1996, the
fees for 1996-97, would be calculated to be:
v . M, ezatibriOee
111,. E �WfTax W/O Tau
bis et Exchange Exchange '.
2 $3,214 $4,299
3 3,469 4,553
5 3,359 4,492
7 3,192 4,271
11 5,327 6,413
A literal reading of the 1991 resolutions does not allow the flexibility of not increasing the
annexation fee unless the Boards take a specific action deferring the automatic
increase. In the interest of full disclosure, staff wanted to bring this fee adjustment to
the Committees along with the others. Staff recommends the Annexation Fee, paid for
properties currently outside of the Districts, be allowed to automatically increase in an
amount determined by the change in the ENRI.A in accordance with adopted Board
policy.
GGS:Ic
J:WVPO WINCRANE�.MTGTAHR. 6 TAF ".8 RFAHR8
Uo-lo-so 11COrm rcum Mill, eUUUSUMr, arch lu co[UJoo ruuaiuit
DISTRICTS 1, 2, 3, 6, 11, 13 AND 14
ORDINANCE NO. ^_
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA AMENDING SECTION 702 OF ORDINANCE NO.
ESTABLISHING WASTEWATER DISC14ARGE
REGULATIONS RELATING TO INCREASED CAPITAL
FACILITIES CONNECTION CHARGES
The Board of Direction;of County Sanitation District No._of Orange County,
California does hereby ORDAIN:
Section 1: Finding. The Boar of Directors finds that the cost at providing the
service for which the Capital Facilities Connection Charges are imposed, has increased since
the establishment of the present fee In 1992, and the amount of the increase set forth herein
does not exceed the reasonable cost of providing the service.
Spclo : Section 702 of Ordinance No._is hereby amended to read as follows:
702. DISTRICT NO, CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION CHARGES
A. District Connection Perms Requimg
No application for a permit for n connection to a District so vi facility of to
any sewerage facility which discharges into a District sewerage facility shall be
considered until a District capital facilities connection charge is paid by the
applicant No connection permit shell be issued unless them is an established
use of the property to be served or a valid building permit issued which
eslablishos the use of said property.
B. District Connection Charae Amounts
(1) Capital facilities connection charge for new
construction, dwelling buildings:
For each new dwelling unit constructed, the capital
facilities connection charge shall be$2,300 per
dwelling unit
(2) Capital facilities connection charge for existing
dwelling buildings:
For the connection of each existing dwelling unit,
the=pilot facilities connection charge shall be
$2,360 per dwelling unit.
i
UO"10'30 11CUOra rxua xuuxxx, euOUxorr, orxx IO $01MO CUU4/UIC
(3) Capital facilites connection charge for new
construction and existing structures, other than
dwelling buildings:
For all other new wnstru*(ion, including, but not
limited to,commercial and industrial buildings,
hotels and motels and public buildings, the capital
facilities connection charge shall be$480 per 1.000
square feet of floor area contained within such
wnetruction,provided that the minimum capital
facilities connection charge for such new
construction shall be$2,360.
(4) Capital facilities connection charge for replacement
buildings[
For new construction replacing former buildings,
the capital facilities connection charge shall be
calculated on the same basis as provided in
paragraphs (1)and(3) above. If such replacement
construction is commenced within two (2)years
after demolition or destruction of the loaner
building, a credit against such charge shall be
allowed and shall be the equivalent capital facilities
connection charge for the building being
demolished or destroyed. calculated on the basis of
current charges for new construction. In no case
shall such credit exceed the capital facilities
connection charges.
(5) Capital facilities connection charges for additions or
alterations of existing buildings:
In the case of structures where further new
construction or alteration is made to increase the
occupancy of family dwelling buildings or the area
of buildings to be used for other than family
dwelling buildings, the capital facilities connection
charge shall be $2,380 for each dwelling unit added
or created, and, in the case of new construction
other than family dwelling buildings, it shall be$450
per 1,000 square feet of additional floor sees
contained within such new construction, provided
such new construction shall contain additional
plumbing fbiture units."
section 3: Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect sixty(60) days
after adoption.
2
Utl-10'90 U4:U8rn PAUa AUUAAS, aUUUAUPP, JPAA lU fllujoo ruuu/ulC
Section 4_ SeverabiliM. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application to any
person or circumstances is held invalid by order of Court,the remainder of the Ordinance or the
application of such provision to other persons or other circumstances shall not be effected.
Se it 5: Codification. The Secretary of the Board shall certify to the adoption of
this Ordinance and shall muse a summary to be published in a newspaper of general
circulation in the District, as required by law,
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the affirmative vote Of not less than twatnirds of the Board
of Directors of County Sanitation District No._of Orange County. California. at a regular
meeting hold 1990.
Chairman of the Boom of Directors of County
Sanitation District No._of Orange County,
California
ATTEST:
Secretary of the Board of Directors
Of County Sanitation District No._
of Orange County, California
3
Wlo-ue 114:102 PlUa auuaaa, euuuXUt?. aria lu soLUJoo ruulluuJ
DISTRICT NO. 5
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALJFORNIA AMENDING SECTION 702 OF ORDINANCE NO.
526 ESTABLISHING WASTEWATER DISCHARGE
REGULATIONS RELATING TO INCREASED CAPITAL
FACILITIES CONNECTION CHARGES
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California
does hereby ORDAIN:
Section : Findinb. The Board of Directors fins that the cost of providing the
service for which the Capital Facilities Connection Charges are imposed, has increased since
the establishment of the present fee in 1992, and the amount of the increase set forth hereii
does not exceed the reasonable cost of providing the service.
Se 'on 2: Section 702 of Ordinance No. 526 is hereby amended to read as foilcWs:
"702. DISTRIC NO CAPITAL FAOILITIeC CONNECTION CHARGES
A. Dmhid Connection Permit Required
NO application for a permit for a connection to a District sewerage facility or to
any sewerage facility which discharges into a District sewerage facility shall be
considered until a District capital facilities connection charge Is paid by the
applicant No connection permit shall be issued unless there is an established
use of the property to be served or a valid building permit issued which
establishes the use of said property.
B. District Connection Charge Amounts
(1) Capital facilities connection charge for new
construction, dwelling buildings:
For each new dwelling unit constructed, the capital
facilities connection charge shall be$2,360 per
dwelling unit.
(2) Capital facilities connection charge for existing
dwelling buildings:
For the connection of each existing dwelling unit,
the capital facilities connection charge shall be
$2,360 per dwelling unit.
1
0-10-110 WWII rxux xuuxxx, wuuijxuPr, brxx lu uolujou ruusl Utz
(3) Capital facilities connection theme for new
construction and existing structures,other than
dwelling buildings:
For a0 other new construction, including, but not
limited to,commercial and industrial buildings,
hotels and motels and public buildings,the capital
facilities connection charge shall be$430 per 1.000
square foot of floor area contained within such
construction, provided that the minimum capital
facilities connection charge for such new
construction shall be$2,3uu.
(4) Capital facilities connection charge for replacement
buildings:
For new construction replacing former buildings,
the capital facilities connection charge shall be
calculated on the same basis as provided in
paragraphs(1) and(3) above. If such replacement
construction is commenced within two(2)years
after demolition or destruction of the fermor
building, a credit against such charge shall be
allowed and shall be the equivalent capital facilities
connection charge for the building being
demolished or destroyed,calculated on the basis of
arrant charges for new construction. In no case
shell such credit exceed the caphal facilities
connection charges.
(5) Capital facilities connection charges for additions or
alterations of existing buildings:
In the case of structures where further new
construction or alteration is made to increase the
occupancy of family dwelling buildings or the area
of buildings to be used for other than family
dwelling buildings,the capital facilities connection
charge shall be$2,360 for each dwelling unit added
or created, and, in the cone of new mnstrucion
other than family dwelling buildings, it shell be$430
per 1,000 square foot of additional floor area
contained within such new construction, provided
such new construction shall contain additional
plumbing fbdure units.
2
Ub-lb-ub U4:11bi'll FGUb JuMb, aUUUNUyp MA fu 10tU3ab rUUb/Utt
(6) Payment of capital faciltes connection charges
shall be required at the time of Issuance of the
building permit for all construction within the
District, excepting in the case of a building legally
exempt from the mquiromerd of obtaining a building
permit in the City of Newport Beach. The payment
of the capital facilities connection charge for such
exempt buildings will be required at the time of, or
prior to,the issuance of a plumbing oonnectio..
permit for any construction within the District."
Section Effective Cate: This Ordinance shall take effect sixty(60)days
after adoption.
Section Saverabilitr. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application to arty
person or circumstances is hold invalid by order of Court, the remainder of the Ordinance or the
application of such provision to other persons or other circumstances shall not be affected.
Section 5: Certification. The Secretary of the Board shall certify to the adoption of
this Ordinance and shall cause a summary to be published in a newspaper of general
circulation In the District, as required by law.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the affirmative vote of not loss than two-thirds of the Board
of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California,at a regular
meeting held , 1996.
Chairman of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County.
California
ATTEST:
Secretary of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No.5
of Orange County, California
3
Ub"Iti-tlb U4abra rxua xuuxix, euuuxurr, Jrxx III tlbtujou rUUC/uut
DISTRICT NO. 7
r ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA AMENDING SECTION 702 OF ORDINANCE NO.
727 ESTABLISHING WASTEWATER DISCHARGE
REGULATIONS RELATING TO INCREASED CAPITAL
FACILITIES CONNECTION CHARGES
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of orange County, califomin
does hereby ORDAIN:
Section I Findinfl. The Board of Directors finds that the cost of providing the
service for which the Capital Facilities Connection Charges are imposed, has Increased since
the establishment of the preserd foe in 1992, and the amount of the Increase set forth herein
does not exceed the reasonable cost of providing the service.
Gection 2: Section 702 of Ordinance No. 727 is hereby amended to mad as follows:
702. DISTRICT NO. CAPITAL FACILMEES CONNECTION CHARGES
A. Dlebict Connection Permit Required
No application for a permit for a connection to a District sewerage facility or to
any sewerage reality which discharges into a District sewerage facility shall be
considered until a District capital facilities connection charge is paid by the
applicant No connection permit shell be issued unless there is an established
use of the property to be served or a valid building permit issued which
establishes the use of said property.
B. District Connection Chame Amounts
(1) Capital facilities connection charge for new
construction, dwelling buildings:
For each new dwelling unit constructed, the capital
facilities connection charge shall be&2,3W per
dwelling unit.
(2) Capital facilities connection charge for existing
dwelling buildings:
For the connection of each existing dwelling unit,
the capital facilities connection charge shall be
b2.WD per dwelling unit.
1
U3-10-e0 04:00ra rsUa KUURn6, WVUVXUrr„1rLa lu SUUJ00 rU10/Ull
(3) Capital facilities connection charge for new
construction and extsting structures, other than
dwelling buildings:
For all other new construction, including, but not
limited to, commercial and industrial buildings,
hotels and motels and public buildings. the capital
facilities connection charge shall be$480 per 1,000
square feet of floor area contained within surh
construction, provided that the minimum capital
facilities connection charge for such new
construction shell be 32,860.
(4) Capital facilities connection charge for replacement
buildings:
For new construction replacing forcer buildings,
the capital facilities connection charge shall be
calculated on the same basis as provided in
paragraphs (1)and (3)above. If such replacement
construction is commenced withln two(2)years
after demolition or destruction of the former
building, a credit against such charge shall be
allowed and shall be the equivalent capital facilities
connection charge for the bulldtng being
demolished or destroyed, calculated on the basis of
currant charges for new construction. In no case
shall such credit exceed tiro cepllal facilities
connection charges.
(5) Capital facilities connection charges for additions or
alterations of crusting buildings:
In the case of structures where further new
construction or alterative is made to increase the
occupancy of family dwelling buildings or the area
of buildings to be used for other than family
dwelling buildings,the capital facilities connection
charge shall be$2,360 for each dwelling unit added
or created. and, in the ease of now construction
other than family dwelling buildings, it shall be $480
per 1,000 square feet of additional floor area
contained within such new construction, provided
such new construction shall contain additional
plumbing fixture units.
2
Ub-lb-Ub U4:U5?1 ykUa kuUSAB, auueHurr, JPeA IU dbLUJUD rulllufc
(6) Truck capital facilities connection charge,
residential uses:
Family dwelling unit: $6 per front fool for the real
property fronting on and connecting to a trunk
sewer, provided that no such charge shall be less
than$400, plus the applicable regular capital
facilities connection charge for dwelling units
hereinabove specified.
(n Trunk capital facilities connection charge,
commercial or industrial establishments:
$10 per front foot for the real property fronting on
and connecting to a trunk sewer, provided that no
such front foot charge shall be less than$500 plus
the applicable regular capital facilities connection
charge for new construction and existing structures
other than dwelling buildings hereinabove
specified.
(6) Capital facilities connection charge, offsite sewers
net a part of Master Plan relative to reimbursement
agreement:
The charges for connections to oft-sae samara
which are not included as part of the District Master
Plan and for which a Non-Master Plan
Reimbursement Agreement has been entered into
between the District and the property owner shell
be in the amount provided for in said Agroomunt.
The amount set forth in said Agreement shall be
the amount due whether the original Agreement is
still In force, has been extended, or has expired.
The capital facilities connection charges shall be in
addition to any other charges hereinabove
established for the property connecting to said
facilities.
(9) Assessment District capital facilities connection
charge:
The regular capital facilities connection charges
provided in the preceding subsections of this
section, plus a sum of money equal to the
assessment charge,without interest, er Treasurefa
charge which would have been made against the
real property on which said improvements are
located had said real property been assessed
3
Ub-I5-9b 114:1.101'9 Wit XUUM, WUUUkorr, drxh 1U 301UJOD rul4lull
within the Assessment District which constructed or
acquired the Assessment Disbicl sewer to which
connection is made.
SoMion 9: Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take eRoa surly(e0)days
after adoption.
Sadon Severablity: If any provision of this Ordinance or the application to any
person or circumstances Is held invalid by order of Court, the remainder of the Ordinance or the
application of such provision to other persons or other circumstances shall not be affected.
sacfien 5: Certification. The Secretary of the Board shall eaniy to the adoption of
this Ordinance and shell cause a summary to be published in a newspaper of general
circulation in the District as required by law.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the affirmative vote of not less than two-thirds of the Board
of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County,California, at a regular
meeting held , 1996.
Chairman of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County,
Callfomla
ATTEST:
Secretary of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No.7
of Orange County, California
4
DATE
PAID
04/17/95 05/01/96 HANDWRITES
AU DISTRICTS
Joint Operating Fund - 573,666.89 305.327.31 251.397.49
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 1.450.407.02 328.632.67 4,333.46
Joint Working Capital Fund - 161,15548 279,915.83 0.00
Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 5,043-93 71,860.61 93.221.91
DISTRICT NO.1 - 894.OD 2,526.70 0.00
DISTRICT N0.2 - 2.007.16 25,755.01 423.00
DISTRICT NO - 9.541.80 963,295.90 90.00
DISTRICT NO.5 - 177.00 5,650.48 538.13
DISTRICT NO, - 24.115.00 1,189.01 0.00
DISTRICT NO, - 882,80 9,780.91 0.00
DISTRICT NO.11 - 5.097,40 8,534.00 0.00
DISTRICT NO.13 - 0.00 35.61 0.00
DISTRICT NO.14 - 0.00 508.93 0.00
DISTRICTS NO, 1 8 7 JOINT - 0,00 0.00 0.00
DISTRICTS NO,3 8 11 JOINT - 0.00 0.00 0.00
DISTRICTS NO,5 8 6 JOINT - 243,282.06 147,226.53 0.00
DISTRICTS NO.6&7 JOINT - 0.00 213.52 0.00
DJSTRICTSNO 7814JOINT - 0.00 16.71 0.00
TOTALS 2,476,270.54 2,150,367.83 350.003.99
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4112196 PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 04117195 POSTING DATE O4/17196
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
161202 AGU $17.50 PUBLICATION
151203 ASL CONSULTING ENGINEERS $423.00 ATWOOD SUBTRUNK PLAN PREPARATION
151204 ATB T-MEGACOM SERVICE $2.737.02 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
151206 ATB T-CELLULAR CRSR $5.05 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
151206 A-Z LOGIC SYSTEMS $356.98 LAB SUPPLIES
161207 ABANNER IDEA $59.26 OFFICE SUPPLIES
151208 ADVANCED COOLING TECHNOLOGY $420.00 ELECTRIC PARTS
151209 AIR B WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOC. $296.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
151210 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $36,664.58 08M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.O.S.9-09
151211 AIR 8 WASTE MGMT.ASSOC. $66.44 PUBLICATION
151212 ASCE CONTINUING EDUCATION $165.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING
151213 AMERICAN AIRLINES $448.40 TRAVEL SERVICES
151214 THE BOND BUYER $858.77 SUBSCRIPTION
151215 AMERICAN PAYROLL ASSOC. $124.95 PUBLICATION
151216 AMERICAN SIGMA $20,628.55 TESTING SUPPLIES
151217 AMERICAN VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS $9,695.86 COMPUTER PARTS
151218 AMOCO ENERGY TRADING $47,266.96 NATURAL GAS MO 628.95
151219 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION $24,057.00 SEWER REPAIRS
151220 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL $1.260.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
151221 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $2,270.20 NOTICES S ADS
151222 APPLE ONE $5,958.92 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
151223 AQUATIC BIOASSAY 8 CONSULTANTS $5.906.00 LAB SERVICES
151224 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT $2,200.74 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
161225 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE,INC. $310.40 TOXIC WASTE REMOVAL
151228 ASSOCIATED CONCRETE PRODUCTS 5290.93 BUILDING MATERIALS
151227 ATKINMONES COMPUTER SERVICE $321.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT
151228 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $3,632.37 PAYROLL SERVICES
151229 AWARDS B TROPHIES $33.40 PLAQUES
151230 BKK LANDFILL $2.272.16 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91
151231 E S BABCOCK&SONS INC $1,024.00 LAB ANALYSIS
151232 BANANA BLUEPRINT $1,240.96 PRINTING M.0.11-07-94
151233 BANCROFT-WHITNEY CO.. $340.21 PUBLICATION
151234 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $378.59 BATTERIES
151235 BAUERCOMPRESSOR $593.22 COMPRESSOR PARTS
151236 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $3,421.82 LAB SUPPLIES
151237 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $329.15 TRUCK WASH TICKETS
151238 A BIEDERMAN,INC. $918.71 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
151239 WT BILLARD $345.11 BUILDING REPAIRS
151240 BIO-GRO DIVISION $45,871.58 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 4-28A5
151241 BISHOPS SANITARY $420.23 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
151242 SOUSA RADIATOR SERVICE $193.95 TRUCK REPAIRS
151243 BONA-RUES 5498.88 TRUCK PARTS
151244 BOOTBARN $360.63 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES
151245 CA P $149,00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
151246 C.L.TECHNOLOGY $720.00 GAS ANALYSIS SERVICES
151247 CS COMPANY $7,782.49 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4112/96 PAGE
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 04/17/95 POSTING DATE 04/17/95
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
151248 CALIF ASSOC,OF SAN.AGENCIES $130.00 WORK CONFERENCE REGISTRATION
151249 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $977.66 SERVICE AGREEMENT
151250 CALIF.DEBT ADVISORY $125.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
151251 CALIFORNIA LABORATORIES 8 DEV $704.00 FUME HOODS DISPOSAL
151252 CALLAN ASSOCIATES,INC. $4.978.78 INVESTMENT ADVISOR SERVICES
151253 CAMALI CORP. $2.569.61 SERVICE AGREEMENT
151254 CAPITAL ENQUIRY,INC. $186.30 PUBLICATION
151255 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $4.806.15 ENGINEERING SERVICES P138,J-33
151255 CASA $260.00 WORK CONFERENCE REGISTRATION
161257 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $796.31 OFFICE FURNITURE
151258 CENTURY SAFETY INST.8 SUPPLY $1,635.11 SAFETY SUPPLIES
161259 CHEMWEST,INC. $96.84 PUMP PARTS
151260 KIMBERLY CHRISTENSEN $1,113.34 TRAINING EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
151261 CLEMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL $14,000.00 CONSULTANT-LANDFILL PROJECT MO 7.31-95
151262 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $220.84 SERVICE AGREEMENT
151263 COUCH 8 SONS $59,283.80 CONSTRUCTION M444
151264 COMMUNICATIONS PERFORMANCE GRP $4,000.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
151265 COMPUSERVE $305.39 COMPUTER SERVICES
151266 CONNELL GM PARTS/DIV. $185.63 TRUCK PARTS
161267 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $2,152.83 ELECTRIC PARTS
151268 CONSOLIDATED PLASTICS CO. $341.97 PUMP
151269 CONSUMER PIPE WEST PLUMBING SUPPLIES
151270 CONTINENTAL EQUIPMENT B SUPPLY $66.93 TOOLS
151271 COOK BROTHERS $437.37 VALVE
151272 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $1.021.90 ENGINE PARTS
151273 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $359.35 TRUCK PARTS
151274 CRANE PRO SERVICES $415.09 CRANE REPAIR
15IZ75 CSUS FOUNDATION $108.26 OPERATOR TRAINING
151270 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION $230.02 FUEL TAXES
151277 DME,INC. $555.9B COMPRESSOR PARTS
151278 DAILY PILOT $222.00 NOTICES BADS
151279 DELL MARKETING L.P. $16,189.98 COMPUTER
151280 DEL MAR ANALYTICAL $950.00 LABANALYSIS
151281 DEZURICK AND/OR CS CO. $2.025.66 VALVES
151282 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. 5392.51 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
151283 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $940.00 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE
151284 OVALS SALES $81.00 FITTINGS
151285 ESP NORTH $665.75 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
161286 ENCHANTER,INC. $2.800.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5.2495
151287 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $887.70 LAB SUPPLIES
151288 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE CENTER $399.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
161289 FLUID TECH.SALES $226.91 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
151290 F 8 M WELDING,INC. $8,566.12 HAND RAILS
161291 FMC CORPORATION $41,054.34 HYDROGEN PEROXIDE MO 9-1494
151292 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE 54,181.25 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-991
151293 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $33.25 AIR FREIGHT
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/12/96 PAGE 3
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID W17/95 POSTING DATE 04/17/95
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
161294 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $181.11 FILTERS
151296 FIRST CHOICE $2.981.34 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT
151298 FORMA SCIENTIFIC,INC. $9.203.25 LAB SUPPLIES
161297 CLIFFORD A FORKERT $1,812.50 SURVEYING SERVICES MO 641-95
151298 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $309.72 PHOTO SUPPLIES
151299 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $11,101.80 WATER USE
151300 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $225.74 PAINT SUPPLIES
151301 FRANKLIN ELECTRONIC PUBLISHERS $123.83 PUBLICATIONS
151302 CITY OF FULLERTON $116.16 WATER USE
161303 EST,INC. $12,25&50 OFFICE SUPPLIES
151304 GTE TELEPHONE OPERATIONS $2,184.29 TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT
151305 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $3,363.63 CHEMICALS
151306 GE IND B POWER SYSTEMS $3,699.60 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
151307 GENERAL PETROLEUM $9,042.86 GASOLINE
151308 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1,051.39 TELEPHONE SERVICES
161309 GIERLICH-MITCHELL,INC. $2.055.94 PUMP PARTS
151310 GRASBY S.T.I. $1.169.29 ENGINE PARTS
151311 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $201.09 PRINTING
151312 DGA CONSULTANTS $6.340.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.OAA Al
151313 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $96.32 TRUCK PARTS
151314 HARBOUR ENGINEERING $5,191.80 MECHANICAL PARTS
151315 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $129.15 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
151316 HAULAWAYCONTAMERS $2,190.00 CONTAINER RENTALS
161317 PL HAWN CO,INC. $6,245.19 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
161318 HELLO $218.95 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
151319 HELPMATES PERSONNEL SERVICES $7,634.01 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
151320 HILTI,INC. $6.185.88 TOOLS
151321 HOME DEPOT $640.64 SMALL HARDWARE
151322 IRS HUGHES CO,INC. $256.66 PAINT SUPPLIES
151323 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $22.323.24 WATER USE
151324 HUNTINGTON AMC/JEEP I RENAULT $178.60 AUTO PARTS
151325 IAML $1,675.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING
151326 IDM CONTROLS,INC. $538.13 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
151327 IPCO SAFETY $869.33 SAFETY SUPPLIES
151328 IMAGING PLUS $550.46 OFFICE SUPPLIES
151329 INDUSTRIAL FILTER MFG. $2,400.00 FILTER
151330 INDUSTRIAL STEAM $1,377.20 PUMP
151331 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $1.334.42 CONNECTORS
151332 ISI INFORTEXT $770.42 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
151333 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. $75.68 TRUCK PARTS
151334 INNOVATION GROUP WEST $5W.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING
161335 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $1.131.48 BATTERIES
151336 IRVINE PHOTO GRAPHICS $13.67 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
151337 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $10.44 WATER USE
151338 J2 PRINTING SERVICES $386.28 PRINTING
151339 JH RECOGNITION CO. $853.17 SERVICE AWARDS
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 41IV96 PAGE4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 04/17/95 POSTING DATE 04/17195
WARRANTNO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
151340 JAMISON ENGINEERING $2,000.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
151341 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $279.46 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
151342 JAYS CATERING $597.34 DIRECTORS MEETING EXPENSE
151343 KALLEENS COMPUTER PRODUCTS $143.67 COMPUTER SUPPLIES
151344 KEMIRON PACIFIC,INC. $170.320.60 FERRIC CHLORIDE MO 9-27-96
151345 KING BEARING,INC. $469.27 MACHINE SUPPLIES
151346 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES 52,055.05 TOOLS
151347 PENNY KYLE $220.06 TRAINING EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
151348 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $1,232.87 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICE
151349 LAMOTTE COMPANY $81.97 SULFIDE TEST KIT
151350 LAWICRANDAL,INC. $1.530.00 SOIL TESTING 7.13.94
151351 ORANGE COUNTY DIVISION $30.75 PUBLICATION
151352 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES $95.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING
151353 LIKE NU TILE $280.00 RESTROOM TILE REPAIR
151354 MEC ANALYTICAL $1,108.00 LABANALYSIS
151355 R.F.MACDONALD CO. $29A5 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
151356 MANDIC MOTORS $45.00 TOWING SERVICES
151357 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $1,259,733.50 CONSTRUCTION Pi-38-2
151358 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $195.42 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
151359 MIKE MCCARTHY BUICK,INC. $17.220.75 NEW TRUCK
151300 DONALD F.MCINTYRE $210.93 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
151361 MIDWAY MFG.&MACHINING $375.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS
151362 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3,998.81 UNIFORM RENTALS
151363 MONITOR LABS $120.78 INSTRUMENT
151364 MOODYS INVESTORS SERVICE 57,500.00 COP RATING MAINTENANCE FEES
151365 MORGAN COMPANY $520.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
151360 MORTON SALT $515.36 SALT
161307 SAM MOWBRAY $1,053.42 TRAINING EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
151368 THE NEWS $76.00 SUBSCRIPTION
151369 NICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY $2,935.65 LUBRICANTSIDIESEL FUEL
151370 NORTEL PRODUCT TRAINING $2,080.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
151371 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $1.212.77 SAFETY GLASSES
151372 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $13,217.27 OFFICE SUPPLIES
161373 OLSTEN STAFFING SERVICES $3.554.00 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
161374 ROBERTJ.00TEN $105.00 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
161375 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL $2.707.44 CHEMICALS
151378 ORANGE COUNTY PUMP CO. $4,948.76 PUMPS
151377 ORANGE COURIER $182.95 COURIER SERVICES
151378 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. $339.27 FITTINGS
161379 OXYGEN SERVICE $1,746.70 SPECIALTY GASES
151380 COUNTY OF ORANGE $90.00 AUDIT/CONT.PROCESSING FEE
151381 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $5,743.98 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP
151382 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT $37,753.80 GAP WATER USE M.O.6-9-93
151383 PC SERVICE SOURCE $114.00 PRINTER PARTS
151354 PACIFIC PARTS $6,960.10 INSTRUMENT PARTS
151385 PACIFIC BELL $18.12 TELEPHONE SERVICES
FUND NO 9199 • JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/12/% PAGES
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 04117/95 POSTING DATE 04/17/95
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
151388 PADGETT - THOMPSON $346.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
151387 PARKHOUSE TIRE,INC. $392.21 TIRES
151388 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 5659.25 REIMS.PETTY CASH
151389 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS 57,418.85 CONSULTING SERVICE
151390 POLYPURE,INC. 520,015.93 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92
151391 POWER SYSTEMS $236.99 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
161392 PROCESS CONTROL SYSTEMS $104.19 REPAIR
151393 PRYOR RESOURCES,INC. $90.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING
151394 PUBLIC SECTOR EXCELLENCE $3150.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING CONSULTANT
151395 RJN GROUP,INC. $995.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
151396 RM CONTROLS $41.41 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
151397 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $2.062.75 TRASH REMOVAL
161398 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO. $241.85 LAB SUPPLIES
151399 REAL TIME SYSTEMS CDR $8,135.2D PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
151400 RED WING SHOES $143.09 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES
151401 BOLT DELIVERY $24.00 FREIGHT
151402 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DIST. $2.152.92 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
151403 RENOLD INC. $80.59 MECHANICAL PARTS
151404 RM MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL $373.80 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
151405 RYAN-HERCO $33.46 METAL
151408 JOSEPH T.RYERSON&SON,INC. $1,742.88 METAL PLATES
151407 SAFETY WEST $82A3 INSTRUMENT PARTS
151408 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $1,747.36 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
151400 SARTORIUS CORP. $266.00 LAB SUPPLIES
151410 SCHWING AMERICA,INC. $1.022.70 PUMP PARTS
151411 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTL $16,120.91 OCEAN MONITORING MO 6.28-95
151412 SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS,INC. $975.70 LAB REPAIRS
161413 SEA COAST DESIGNS $309.70 LAB SUPPLIES
151414 CITY OF SEAL BEACH $043.95 WATER USE
151415 SELCO PRODUCTS CO. $367.27 METER
151416 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $1,199.98 TOOLS
151417 SHURELUCK SALES $8,398.48 TOOLS44ARDWARE
181418 SIEMON,LARSON&MARSH $1,228.00 LEGAL SERVICES
151419 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $350.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS
151420 THE SMITH GROUP $1,237.30 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
151421 SOUTH COAST WATER $520.00 LAB SUPPLIES
151422 SO CALIF EDISON CO $18.94 POWER
151423 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $1.003.45 NATURAL GAS
151424 SO.CALIFORNIA MARINE INST. $800.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
151425 SPEX CHEMICAL&SAMPLE PREP $1.096.05 LAB SUPPLIES
161428 SRECO FLEXIBLE $6,086.33 SAFETY SUPPLIES
151427 STANDARD&POORS CORP $1.000.00 COP CONTRACT SERVICE
151428 SUPERB ONE-HOUR PHOTO $21.84 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
151420 SUPER CHEM CORP. $1.553.06 CHEMICALS
151430 SUPER ICE CORP. $80.22 LAB SUPPLIES
151431 TESTAR MVS I DIV CERPLEX $431.00 COMPUTER REPAIR
FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 4112196 PAGE6
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 04/17/95 POSTING DATE O4/17/95
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
151432 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $3,360.46 MECHANICAL PARTS
151433 TOSHIBA INTERNATIONAL $1,998.40 INSTRUMENT PARTS
151434 DANIELTREMBLAY $1,939.98 TRAINING EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
151435 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $678.30 TRUCK PARTS
151430 JG TUCKER&SON,INC. $2.000.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS
151437 UNISOURCEWOR BUTLER PAPER $545.23 OFFICE SUPPLIES
151438 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $35.00 PARCEL SERVICES
151439 UNIVOFTEXAS/AUSTIN $500.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
151440 VWR SCIENTIFIC $4.810.19 LAB SUPPLIES
151441 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $63.21 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
161442 VERTEX TECHNOLOGIES,INC. $939.40 FIBER OPTICS
151443 VORTEX INDUSTRIES $925.00 BUILDING REPAIRS
151444 WACKENHUT CORP. $3,389.66 CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS
151445 WAL-CON CONSTRUCTION CO. $232,522.71 CONSTRUCTION 5.37-3
151446 CARL WARREN&CO. $6,043.93 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR
161447 WAXIE $792.77 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
151448 WESTINGHOUSE,ENERGY SER. $1,450.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
151449 WESTIN SANTA CLARA $240.90 HOTEL RESERVATIONS
151450 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $1,445.91 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
151451 WHATMAN $792.09 LAB SUPPLIES
151452 NANCY WHEATLEY $507.24 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
151453 WHESSOE VAREC $565.00 VALVES
151464 JUDITH A.WILSON $77.18 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
151455 WITEG $411.81 LAB SUPPLIES
151456 WOLFE AND ASSOCIATES,INC. $260.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
161457 XEROX CORP. $2.860.58 COPIER LEASES
151458 MOYASAR T.YAHYA $586.40 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
TOTAL CALIMS PAID 04117M $2,476,270.54
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/12 96 PAGE 7
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 04/17/95 POSTING DATE 04/17/95
SUMMARY AMOUNT
#1 OPER FUND $894.00
#2 OPER FUND $2.007.16
#3 OPER FUND $2,461.80
#3 CAP FAC FUND $7,090.00
#5 OPER FUND $177.00
#6 OPER FUND 548.00
#6 CAP FAC FUND $24.067.00
#7 OPER FUND $442.15
#7 CAP FAC FUND $440.66
#11 OPER FUND $76.50
#11 CAP FAC FUND $5,020.80
0586 OPER FUND $28.59
#586 CAP FAC FUND $243,253.47
JT OPER FUND $573.866.89
CORP $1,460,407.02
SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $5,043.93
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $161.155.48
$2,476,270.54
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 04I29M6 PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID O6Ml/96 POSTING DATE 05101/96
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
151496 ASTD PUBLISHING SERVICE $1,597.50 PUBLICATIONS
151497 ATM AA,INC. $4,906.00 LAB SERVICES
151498 ACADEMIC PRESS $21.50 PUBLICATIONS
151499 ADVANCED ENGINE TECH CORP. $15,720.55 ENGINE TESTING J-19
151500 AMERIDATA $1,073.89 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
151501 AMERICAN AIR FILTER,INC. $282.78 MECHANICAL PARTS
151502 AMSA $525.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
151503 AMSA $526.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING
151504 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION $1,424.04 SEWER REPAIRS
151505 ANALYSTS INC $2,666.39 MECHANICAL PARTS
151606 ANIXTER-DISTRIBUTION $393.56 COMPUTER SUPPLIES
151507 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $1.191.61 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
151608 AWARDS&TROPHIES $48.49 PLAQUES
151509 BKK LANDFILL $2.935.45 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.I0 9-91
151510 BANANA BLUEPRINT $3,129.45 PRINTING M.O.11-07-94
161511 BANK OF AMERICA $20.27 BANKING SERVICES
161512 SHABBIR S.BASRAI $275.19 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
161513 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $96.19 BATTERIES
151514 BAUER COMPRESSOR $127.89 COMPRESSOR PARTS
151515 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $20.00 TRUCK WASH TICKETS
151518 BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS $85.27 LAB EQUIPMENT
151517 BERENSON COMMUNICATIONS 5282.09 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
151518 BEVCUSTER $608.58 MAPS
151519 810GRO DIVISION $41,W3.91 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 4-2695
161620 BLACK EMP.&EDU.JOURNAL $495.00 PUBLICATION
151521 BRITHINEE ELECTRIC $236.41 ELECTRIC PARTS
151522 BROOKS INSTRUMENT DIV. $238.62 INSTRUMENT
151523 BUDGET JANITORIAL $3,330.00 JANITORIAL SERVICES MO 1.12-94
151524 BUSH&ASSOCIATES,INC. $1,O70.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.64&94
151525 C.L.TECHNOLOGY $720.00 GAS ANALYSIS SERVICES
151528 CS COMPANY $1.762.48 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
151627 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH INC. $740.29 LAB SUPPLIES
151628 CALIFORNIA AUTO COLLISION,INC. $338.17 TRUCK BODY REPAIR
151529 THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CA. $195.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING
161530 CASA $130.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING
151531 CENTURY MICRO PRODUCTS $5.989.83 COMPUTER SUPPLIES
151532 CENTURY SAFETY INST.&SUPPLY $89.77 SAFETY SUPPLIES
151533 COAST&OCEAN $18.00 SUBSCRIPTION
151534 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $300.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
151535 COLEMANICASKEY ARCHITECTS $42,177.30 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MO I1-15-95
151536 COLOR ARTS INC $2,814.73 PRINTING SERVICES
151537 COLTON EQUIPMENT CO $402.50 CRANE INSPECTION
151538 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $7,542.50 PUMP PARTS
1515M CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $3,297.71 ELECTRIC PARTS
151540 CONSOLIDATED PLASTICS CO $180.18 LAB SUPPLIES
151541 CONSOLIDATED REPROGRAPHICS $52.15 PRINTING SERVICES
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE N129196 PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 05/01/96 POSTING DATE 05/01/W
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
151542 CONSUMER PIPE $595.33 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
151643 CONTINENTAL EQUIPMENT&SUPPLY $177.81 TOOLS
151544 CONTROL DESIGN SUPPLY $223.17 ELECTRIC PARTS
151545 CONTROL SPECIALISTS INC $2D5.72 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
15150 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $1.003.23 ENGINE PARTS
151647 COORDINATED EQUIP CO INC $125.00 CRANE CERTIFICATION
161548 COUNTERPART ENTERPRISES 5829.59 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
151649 COUNTY CLERK $38.00 ANNEXATION FEE
151550 COUNTY CLERK $38.00 ANNEXATION FEE
151551 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $837.70 ELECTRIC PARTS
151552 JAMESCOWAN $108.00 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
161553 CALIFORNIA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE $322.40 PUBLICATIONS
151554 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $19,584.OD UNEMPLOYMENT CHARGES
151555 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION $24.29 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK FEE
151566 DAPPERTIRE $776.51 TIRES
151557 JAMES DARLINGTON $2,887.50 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
151658 DATASTORM $87.46 SOFTWARE
151559 ALBERT W.DAVIES,INC. $936.404.08 CONSTRUCTION 3.3611
151560 TOM DAWES $347.71 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
151561 DE GUELLE&SONS GLASS CO $S4.29 SAFETY GLASS
151552 DELL MARKETING L P. 577,006.96 COMPUTERS
151563 DEL MAR ANALYTICAL $1.410.00 SIOSOLIDS ANALYSIS
151664 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIF. $57,540.31 DENTAL INSURANCE PLAN M.O.1-12-94
151565 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $1.790.81 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
151566 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $116.00 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE
151567 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $562.73 PAINT SUPPLIES
151568 ESP NORTH $823.48 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
151569 ENCHANTER,INC. $3,50000 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5-24-96
151570 EXCALIBUR ENTERPRISES $5,279.96 NIGHT VISION VIDEO CAMERA
151671 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $2,696.25 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91
161672 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $307.95 AIR FREIGHT
151573 FINE SCIENCE TOOLS INC $90.27 LAB SUPPLIES
151574 FIRST CO&I OR NORTHERN DIST. $156.41 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
151575 FISONS INSTRUMENTS $241.77 SERVICE AGREEMENT
151576 FLEXI-LINERCORP $11.539.44 INSPECTION B REPAIR OF DIGESTER LINING
151577 FLICKINGER CO $998.84 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
151578 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $1.403.56 PHOTO SUPPLIES
151679 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $316.50 PAINT SUPPLIES
151580 FRANCE COMPRESSOR PRODUCT $1,534.33 VALVE GUIDE
151581 FRY'S ELECTRONICS $5,801.03 ELECTRONIC B COMPUTER SUPPLIES
151682 GASB $75.00 PUBLICATION
151583 GST,INC. $8,871.30 OFFICE SUPPLIES
151584 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $630.76 LUMBER/HARDWARE
151585 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1,211.87 TELEPHONE SERVICES
1615W GIERLICH-MITCHELL,INC. $11.510.93 PUMP PARTS
151557 WWGRAINGER,INC. $103.48 COMPRESSOR PARTS
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 04/29/96 PAGE 3
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID DWI/96 POSTING DATE 05/01/96
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
1515" GRASSY S.T.I. $1.121.75 ENGINE PARTS
151589 GRASEBYANDERSEN $1,065.24 LAB SUPPLIES
151590 GRATING PACIFIC,INC $1,949.20 FIBERGLASS GRATING
151591 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $101.47 PRINTING
151592 DGA CONSULTANTS $4,180.00 SURVEYING SERVICES 3.3611
151593 DAVID M GRIFFITH&ASSOC. $3,209.15 LAB MANAGER RECRUITMENT
151594 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $1,024.78 TRUCK PARTS
161595 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $372.12 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
151595 HELPMATES PERSONNEL SERVICES $693.88 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
151597 HERBS BLACK FOREST BAKERY $389.00 MEETING EXPENSE
151598 HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT $2,083.33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN.
151699 HOLMES&NARVER,INC. $22.384.29 ENGINEERING SERVICES P144
151600 HOME DEPOT $152.34 SMALL HARDWARE
151601 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $317.51 PAINT SUPPLIES
161602 IDEXX $132.63 LAB SUPPLIES
151603 IPCO SAFETY $1,904.92 SAFETY SUPPLIES
151604 IMAGING PLUS $94.09 OFFICE SUPPLIES
151605 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. $600.00 TRUCK PARTS
1516M INORGANIC VENTURES $239.87 LAB SUPPLIES
151607 INTEGRATED URBAN FORESTRY $450.00 FIELD INSPECTION&ANALYSIS
151608 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $1,094.85 BATTERIES
1616M IRVINE PHOTO GRAPHICS $143.26 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
151610 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $4.90 WATER USE
151611 JAMISON ENGINEERING $2.477.14 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
151612 GREATWESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $618.73 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
151613 JAY'S CATERING $903.86 DIRECTORS MEETING EXPENSE
151614 JETFORM CORP. $305.00 PUBLICATIONS
151615 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $311.43 ELECTRIC PARTS
151616 JONES HALL HILL&WHITE $8,707.76 BOND COUNSEL SERVICES M001-24-96
161617 KALLEEN'S COMPUTER PRODUCTS $1,799.97 COMPUTER SUPPLIES
151618 KEENAN SUPPLY $895.61 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
151619 KING BEARING,INC. $1,782.58 MACHINE SUPPLIES
151620 KIRWAN COMPANY $640.80 MISCELLANEOUS HARDWARE
151621 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $2,965.64 TOOLS
151622 LAMOTTE COMPANY $76.93 SULFIDE TEST KIT
151623 LAIDLAW ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES $190.00 WASTE DISPOSAL
161624 LASHER DODGE $13.533.69 PICK-UP TRUCK
151625 LIEBERT CORPORATION $26,883.64 ELECTRIC PARTS
151628 LOCALAGENCY $3,900.00 ANNEXATION FEE
151627 LOCALAGENCY $950.00 ANNEXATION FEE
151628 CITY OF LOS ANGELES $1.60 CONNECTION FEE
151629 LUCCI'S $124.00 MEETING EXPENSE
151630 MPS $84.35 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
151631 MACOMCO $928.20 SERVICE AGREEMENT
151632 MSA $600.08 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
1516M MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY CORP. $457.26 MISCELLANEOUS HARDWARE
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 04R9/96 PAGE 4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 05101MO POSTING DATE 05/MI/96
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
151034 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS,INC. $3.260.95 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
151835 DENISE MARTINEZ $125.36 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
151838 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $71.38 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
151637 MELLON TRUST $20.139.17 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
151638 MICRO MOTION $855.71 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
151639 MICROFLEX MEDICAL CORP $365.00 SAFETY SUPPLIES
161640 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3.182.75 UNIFORM RENTALS
151641 NAGDCA $300.00 ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP
151642 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES $1,062.50 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES
151643 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $915.01 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
151644 NEUTRON $1,848.79 ANIONIC POLYMER M.O.8-1094
151545 NICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY $9.557.07 LUBRICANTS/DIESEL FUEL
151646 NORCAL CONTROLS,INC. $306.43 INSTRUMENT PARTS
151647 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $1,060.08 OFFICE SUPPLIES
15160 OMNI WESTERN INC $256.86 TOOLS
151649 ROBERT J OOTEN $762.61 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
151650 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $4,539.06 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
151661 ORANGE COURIER $141.16 COURIER SERVICES
151652 ORANGE VALVE 8 FITTING CO. $748.21 FITTINGS
151653 OXYGEN SERVICE $2,040.93 SPECIALTY GASES
151664 COUNTY OF ORANGE $270.00 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE
151655 PSSI $7,097.85 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION
161066 PACIFIC INVESTMENT MGMT CO $149,644.00 INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT SERVICES
151557 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $395.00 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
151658 PACIFIC PARTS $139.17 INSTRUMENT PARTS
161659 PACIFIC BELL $1.172.44 TELEPHONE SERVICES
151660 PADRE JANITORIAL SUPPLY $293.51 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
151661 PARAGON CABLE $36.78 CABLE SERVICES
151662 PARTS UNLIMITED $988.06 TRUCK PARTS
151863 PASCAL B LUDWIG $108,796.00 CONSTRUCTION P243-1
151664 PEERLESS WIPING MATERIALS $721.93 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
151665 PERMA SEAL $102.91 LUBE OIL
151666 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $746.38 REIMS.PETTY CASH,TRAINING 8 TRAVEL
151667 WILLIAM PIERCE $572.80 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
151668 POLYMETRICS,INC. $1,262.76 LAB SUPPLIES
151669 POWER SYSTEMS $147.88 MECHANICAL PARTS
151670 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $88.00 ICE FOR SAMPLES
151671 PUMP ENGINEERING $1,000.03 PUMP PARTS
151672 PUMPING SOLUTIONS INC $564.40 PUMP PARTS
151673 PUTZMEISTER,INC. $505.66 PUMP PARTS
151674 QUICKSTART TECHNOLOGIES $3,750.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
151675 RD SYSTEMS,INC $245.00 CAMERA REPAIR
151676 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $308.66 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS
151677 R 8 R INSTRUMENTS $365.82 ELECTRIC PARTS
151878 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO. $903,91 LAB SUPPLIES
151679 RED WING SHOES $277.29 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 04/29196 PAGE 5
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 05/01/W POSTING DATE 05/01/96
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
151680 BOLT DELIVERY $72.00 FREIGHT
151681 RENOLDINC. $741.73 MECHANICAL PARTS
151682 RONAN ENGINEERING CO $142.60 ALARM PANEL RELAY
151663 RYAN-HERCO $30.90 METAL
161684 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $1.535.38 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
151685 SARTORIUS CORP. $85.00 LAB SUPPLIES
151686 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $167.18 SPECIALTY GASES
151687 SEA COAST DESIGNS $297.19 LAB SUPPLIES
151688 SEAL PRO INC $2,718.35 MECHANICAL PARTS
151689 SEARS ROEBUCK S CO $124.27 TOOLS
151690 SENTIENT SYSTEMS,INC. $2,882.56 FACILITATOR SERVICES
151691 SEWER EQUIP CO OF AMERICA $1,201.48 LEADER HOSE
151692 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $302.70 TOOLS
151693 SHURELUCK SALES $4,188.63 TOOLS/HARDWARE
151694 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $962.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS
151695 SMITH-EMERY 00. $162.00 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-13.94
151696 SMITH PIPE&SUPPLY $155.12 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
151697 SNAP ON/SUN CORP $964.43 TOOLS
1516M SO CALIF EDISON CO $27,680.91 POWER
151699 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $8,853.99 NATURAL GAS
151700 SPARLING INSTRUMENT CO.,INC. $250.00 METER
151701 SQUARED/CRISP AUTOMATION SYSTEMS $2,834.00 ELECTRICAL REPAIR
151702 STANDARD SUMP a EQUIP CO $37.03 MECHANICAL PARTS
151703 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION $250.00 ANNEXATION FEE
151704 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION $250.00 ANNEXATION FEE
161705 KEITH D STOLZENBACH $1,650.00 CONSULTING SERVICES
151705 SUMMIT STEEL $958.98 METAL
151707 SUNSET FORD $346.01 TRUCK PARTS
151708 SUPELCO,INC. $148.65 LAB SUPPLIES
151709 SUPERCHEMCORP. $2,238.41 CHEMICALS
151710 SUPER POWER PRODUCTS $517.20 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
151711 SUPREX CORP. $2.500.00 RENTAL AGREEMENT
151712 SYMCAS $7,647.60 CONSULTING SERVICES
151713 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG,COMPANY $989.46 ELECTRIC CART PARTS
151714 TENNANT CO $158.03 AUTO PARTS
151715 TEXAS COMMERCE BANK $10,472.47 COP TRUSTEE SERVICES
151718 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $597.00 MECHANICAL PARTS
151717 TONER SYSTEM INTERNATIONAL $1,290.85 PRINTER SUPPLIES
151718 TRAFFIC CONTROL ENGINEERING $1,400.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS
151719 TRENCH SHORING COMPANY $17.509.36 STEEL PLATES
151720 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $81.64 TRUCK PARTS
151721 JG TUCKER S SON,INC. $1,630.70 INSTRUMENT PARTS
161722 U.S.AUTO GLASS CENTERS $200.82 TRUCK PARTS
151723 UNISOURCE&/OR BUTLER PAPER $96.33 OFFICE SUPPLIES
151724 DATAVAULT/US SAFE DEPOSITCO $94.00 BACK-UP TAPE STORAGE
151725 VWR SCIENTIFIC 35,379.53 TAB SUPPLIES
FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0429196 PAGE6
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 06/01/96 POSTING DATE 051011%
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
151726 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $832.16 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
151727 VALVATE ASSOCIATES $491.77 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
151728 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS $2,050.40 FREIGHT
151729 VERTEX TECHNOLOGIES,INC. $1,743.07 FIBER OPTICS
151730 VERTEX SYSTEMS $2,507.60 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT
151731 VORTEX INDUSTRIES $860.00 BUILDING REPAIRS
151732 WACKENHUT CORP. $5,779.36 CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS
151733 WAL-CON CONSTRUCTION CO. $146,304.79 CONSTRUCTION P243-1
151734 WAXIE $541.00 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
151735 WEF $325.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING
151736 WEST COAST ANALYTICAL SRV $1,950.00 BIOSOLIDS ANALYSIS
151737 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $27,168.61 CAUSTIC SODA NO 6-23-95
151738 WESTIN SANTA CIARA $240.90 MANAGEMENT TRAINING-LODGING
151730 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $262.53 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
151740 WESCO $350.19 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
151741 CITY OF WESTMINSTER $256.25 SURFACE GRADING
151742 ROURKE,WOODRUFF 3 SPRADLIN $87.164.62 LEGAL SERVICES MO 7.26-95
151743 GARY YOUNG(STATEWIDE INSTL) $990.00 INSTALL BIOLOGICAL HOODS IN LAB
151744 ZYMARK CORP. $118.15 LAB EQUIPMENT
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID O610V98 $2,150,367.83
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE N129/96 PACE 7
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 05MI/96 POSTING DATE 05/01198
SUMMARY AMOUNT
#1 OPER FUND $2,526.70
#2 OPER FUND $12,876.52
#2 CAP FAC FUND $12,876.49
#3 OPER FUND $18,488.56
#3 CAP FAC FUND $9H,807.34
05 OPER FUND $5,560.48
#6 OPER FUND $808.29
#6 CAP FAC FUND $380.72
#7 OPER FUND $9.330.91
#7 CAP FAC FUND $450.00
#11 OPER FUND $8.360.02
#11 CAP FAC FUND $173.98
#13 OPER FUND $35.61
#14 OPER FUND $384A3
914 CAP FAC FUND $122.60
#586 CAP FAC FUND $147.226.53
#687 OPER FUND $213.52
#7814 OPER FUND $15.71
.IT OPER FUND $305,327.31
CORP $328.632.67
SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $71,860.61
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $279,916.93
$2,150,367.83
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE-VARIOUS PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID-MISCELLANEOUS HANDWRITE WARRANTS
WARRANT DATE WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
04/11M 151195 ASCE TUL CONFERENCE $375.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING
04111M 151196 ALBARKER $15,640.13 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM
04/11/96 151197 COUNTY CLERK $25.00 NOTICE OF EXEMPTION FEE
04/11/96 151198 ALEX FISHMAN $4,802.31 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM
04/11/96 151199 PAULINE JOHNSTON AND $6,160.00 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM
"11/96 151200 JOEL MANCHESTER,M.D. $10,068.80 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM
04/11/96 151201 HELENE WINOGURA $7,100.93 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM
04/15/96 151459 APWA S85.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
04/15/95 151460 COUNTY CLERK $38.00 NOTICE OF EXEMPTION FEE
04/15/86 151461 COUNTY CLERK $38,00 NOTICE OF EXEMPTION FEE
04/15l86 151462 UPPER NEWPORT BAY $20.00 EARTH DAY FEE
04/19/98 151463 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $1.200.00 APPEALFEE
"19m 151464 KEYE PRODUCTIVITY CENTER $139.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
04/19M 151465 WATERUSE MEMBERSHIP $100.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING
04/24/96 151486 DONNA ANDERSON $21.95 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM
04/24/96 161487 HARRY CROMWELL $19,125.00 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM
04/24/96 151488 EMERGENCY SERVICE RESTORATION $2,144.30 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM
0424/96 151489 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT S495.00 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM
0424/96 151490 NEWPORT HARBOR LOCKSMITH S65.00 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM
0424196 151491 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS INC $129,612.96 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 3-29�95
0424196 151492 WATERUSE ASSOCIATION $150.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING
0426/96 151493. JOHN C.COX,JR. $200.45 CASA WORKSHOP
0426/95 151494 SAL SAPIEN $200.45 CASA WORKSHOP
0426/95 151495 PEER SWAN $MDA5 CASA WORKSHOP
05/01/96 151745 NICHOLAS ARHONTES $543.55 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
05/01AB 151746 THE BALBOA BAY CLUB $3,376.65 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM
05/01/96 161747 GASKET ENGINEERING $90.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
05/01/96 151748 INNOVATION GROUP WEST $420.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING
05/03/96 151749 THEN BALBOA BAY CLUB $955.40 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM
05/03196 151750 EMERCON RESTORATION $5.967.66 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM
06/03/96 151751 MARTIN 8 MILDRED LITKE $4.391.42 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM
05/03/96 151762 WORLD RESTORATION $2.469.44 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM
05/09/96 151778 AMSA $526.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
05/09/96 151779 DONNA ANDERSON $67.50 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM
05/09/96 151780 DE GUELLE&SONS GLASS CO $560.00 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM
05/09/96 151781 EMERSON RESTORATION $437.25 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM
06/09/96 151782 PAULINE JOHNSTON AND $3,619.19 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM
05109M 151783 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS INC $128,563.20 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 329-96
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID S350,003.99
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE-VARIOUS PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID-MISCELLANEOUS HANDWRITE WARRANTS
SUMMARY AMOUNT
92 CAP FAC FUND $423.00
03 OPER FUND $90.00
05 OPER FUND $538.13
JT OPER FUND $261,397.49
CORF $4,333.46
SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $93,221.91
$350,003.99
SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
REGULAR MEETING
MAY 22, 1996 - 7:30 P.M.
RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 4
Minute excerpts have been received as set forth below. Pursuant to Regular Agenda Item
No. 4, it is appropriate to receive and file said excerpts:
(4) (a) DISTRICTS 1. 7 & 14
Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept resignation of Mayor
Worley of the City of Tustin from the Boards of Directors of Districts Nos. 1, 7
and 14, and seating first and second alternates to the mayor, as follows:
District Active Director Alternate Director
1, 7 & 14 Thomas R. Saltarelli Jim Potts
(d) Consideration of motion to receive and file any minute excerpts received
subsequent to preparation of supplemental agenda, if any
(8) DISTRICTS 2, 3, 5. 6 & 11
If no corrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will be deemed
approved as attached and be so ordered by the Chair:
Distict 2 - May 4, 1996 adjourned
District 3 - May 4, 1996 adjourned
District 5 - May 4, 1996 adjourned
District 6 - May 4, 1996 adjourned
District 11 - May 4, 1996 adjourned
a:MPMCWwGNZn.M
s ��, . �„
The News Pipeline
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
"Protecting the Public Health and Environment Through Excellence in Wastewater Systems"
Volume 3, No. 10 May 22, 1996
Tony Gutierrez Sr. Retires! be in his 90s and eventually died after being
y thrown from a horse.
Tony's many interests include ocean fishing,
T _ There are as many playing saxophone in his own band, and dancing.
l interesting stories here at He has always had a love of learning and recently
the Districts as there are taught himself how to arc-weld. Another little-
people. But few match the known fact about Tony Sr. is that he speaks
legacy of part-time English, Spanish and Japanese fluently.
(. laboratory assistant Tony Nobody is a stranger to Tony. He always says
". Gutierrez Sr. who just hello to everyone he meets. He is helpful, kind
retired after 22 years at and considerate, and can always make people
p, the age of 871 As you will laugh. He says, "It makes the job go easier."We
see, Tony Sr. was no agree. And we all wish Tony Sr. good luck in his
ordinary employee. In fact, second retirement!
his two sons, Tony Jr. and Art, both retired from
the Districts after long careers before Tony Sr.
did! Districts' Employees Receive
Tony's tenure at the Districts followed his first Certificates from
career as the owner and operator of a market and
butcher shop in Compton.When he started at the International Society for
Districts in 1974, he was our surfzone sample
taker on what the laboratory calls "The Beach Measurement and Control
Run." Five days a week, starting at sunrise, Tony
drove in from Compton, picked up the jeep, and Congratulations are in order for five
traveled the beach from Boise Chica to Corona employees who have recently received
Del Mar taking surfzone water samples at our 17 certificates from the International Society for
shoreline stations. He did the beach run until Measurement and Control (ISA). These select
about four years ago when he began doing individuals met the requirements of ISA's rigid
general lab support, including getting boat standards for experience, education and training,
samples, gassing-up and washing vehicles, and were awarded registered certification for
cleaning acid bottles and general maintenance. these qualities and abilities.
When he would go out on quarterly trawls, he The recipients of ISA's two highest ratings,
was always the first person on the boat and the "Level 2 or 3" for technical certification, were
last to leave at the end of the day. He was still Dale Brooks, James Clark, James Hauter and
energetic and cheerful when everyone else was Ken Olberg from Division 3370, Instrumentation.
exhausted. One of the things people comment on Shamshad Hyder of Division 2430, Plant
most about Tony Sr. is that he has endless Automation, was also awarded a "Level 3".
energy and strength. He says that he has always ISA is recognized internationally as the
believed in hard work, and never felt good unless leading authority on standards assessment and
he was working. "It keeps you young," he says. establishment for control engineering, design
Tony Sr. would often tell stories about riding and practice. ISA is utilized and well respected in
around Lake Tahoe on horseback as a child the wastewater and petrochemical industries,
before there were roads there and remembers and all other industries that use process control
taking the stagecoach from Compton to Dana and monitoring.
Point with his grandfather. His grandfather lived to
1
Tom Dawes Jr. Earns M.D. Jeff is finishing his Masters degree in Marine
Biology at California State University, Long
from Howard University Beach. Call Jeff, ext. 3567, if you'd like more
information about his presentation.
Thomas M. Dawes Jr., son of Engineering
Planning Manager Tom Dawes, received his
Doctor of Medicine degree from Howard Pre-Retirement
University in Washington D.C. on May 10. Dr. Seminar Schedule
Dawes, who graduated with honors and was
eighth in his class, will now begin a residency in Are you thinking of retiring in the next year or
family practice in Scottsdale, Ariz. so? To help prepare for retirement and get your
Congratulations Dr. Dawes! important questions answered, you're invited to
attend an Orange County Employees Retirement
Kimberl Christensen System (OCERS) pre-retirement seminar. Day-
Kimberly long seminars are held from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
Promoted to Supervisor Evening seminars are split over three successive
weeks from 6:00 p.m. to 9:30 p.m.
Congratulations to Kimberly Christensen Seminars are scheduled for the following
who has just been promoted to Supervisor of the dates:
Organic Analysis Section of the Environmental • June 12 (daytime)
Sciences Laboratory. Kim comes to this position • July 12 (daytime)
with more than 15 years of experience in • Aug. 6, 13, 20 (evening)
laboratory analysis of wastewater. When she • Sept. 10, 17, 24 (evening)
first came to the Districts (and when we were • Oct. 1, 8, 15 (evening)
smaller and everyone in the laboratory was • Nov. 15 (daytime)
cross-trained to wear multiple professional hats), Topics to be covered include financial
Kim worked in the areas of microbiology, marine planning,estate planning, social security benefits,
monitoring and wet chemical analysis. For the deferred compensation, the retiree health care
past nine years, Kim has distinguished herself as program and your OCERS retirement benefits.
Principal Lab & Research Analyst in the Call Mary Abbott in the OCERS Retirement
Organics Analysis Section. She has assisted Office at 975-1962 if you have any questions
Laboratory Manager Sam Mowbray in the about the seminars.
administration of this section for the past several
months. Please Don't Feed the Animals
In her new position, Kim will supervise the
functions involved in the organic analysis of Our two plant sites are home to several
wastewater, source control, air, and marine species of wild animals including ground
biology samples. squirrels, rats, opossums, skunks, rabbits and
feral cats. While the animals that live on our
plant grounds
Jeff Armstrong Speaks to don't feed themmay be cute and furry, please
Southern California There was a recent incident near the
Academy of Sciences warehouse at Plant No. 2 where a ground
z squirrel had chewed through a wiring harness of
Jeff Armstrong, an intern working for the a car disabling it. Feeding the animals only
Environmental Compliance and Monitoring encourages them to hang around—and who
Division, gave a talk and presented a poster at knows how much more damage they can cause?
the Southern California Academy of Sciences
annual meeting at Loyola Marymount University Third Quarter Facts And Statistics
on May 3 and 4. Using data from the Districts'
Ocean Monitoring Program, Jeffs presentation The Districts' FY 95-96 Third Quarter
was titled, "Analysis of 20 Years of Fish Trawl Pertinent Facts and Key Statistics summary
Data off Orange County, California, 1975-1994." sheets are available from Pat McNally, ext.
2056.
2
Become a Pi aline Reporter! 'I • In reserved parking places for Rideshare
participants.
Are you a frustrated writer?Would you`"`"`'" • In reserved parking places for employees.The
you like to y
see your work in print? Do you need an outlet for appropriate "S" or "T" or "R" parking permit
your creativity? Well, we have just the answer! must be displayed when parking in an "S" or
Join the Reporter's Network and become a "T" or"R" designated lot or space.
News Pipeline staff reporter. This group of select • reserved parking spaces for Districts'
v
individuals will be the eyes and ears of The News vehicles.
PARKING PERMITS
Pipeline in the field, and help bring more diversity to
our coverage of employee and Districts' activities. Parking permits are issued t all employees.
c
The permit has a letter on it that corresponds to a
Just call the editor of The News Pipeline, Pat designated parking lot nearest your work location.
McNally, ext. 2056, and sign up today! Please park only in parking lots that correspond
to the letter on your permit. Notify Human
Traffic and Parking Resources, ext. 2111. if you need to replace a
lost or broken permit.
Regulations U date SPEED LIMIT
As a friend) reminder, ark in the lot The maximum speed limit allowed within
y pleas P Districts' property is 15 miles per hour.
you were assigned. That would sure help the
overcrowding situation in our parking lots.
Here are some other facts you might find of Father's Day Raffle
interest:
CURB MARKINGS The Employee Activity Committee (EAC) is
• RED indicates no stopping, standing or sponsoring a Father's Day Raffle on June 13 to
parking. help raise money for this year's Employee
• YELLOW indicates it is safe to stop for a Picnic. Tickets are $.50 each or three for a dollar
maximum of 30 minutes to load or unload and can be purchased from your EAC
freight or passengers. representative.
• WHITE indicates it is safe to load or unload First prize is $50 worth of steaks, second
passengers only for the posted time limit. prize is a $40 gift certificate from Home Depot,
• BLUE indicates that parking is restricted to and third prize is a new set of barbecue tools.
vehicles of disabled persons displaying the
appropriate license plate or placard. Join the American Cancer
PROHIBITED PARKING Society's Annual "Bela for Life"
Parking is prohibited in the following areas: Y Y
• On a crosswalk or sidewalk. 1 —
• On a roadway if the vehicle obstructs the flow RELAYS The Employee Activity
of traffic. . 0 Committee is sponsoring a team
• In front of a fire hydrant or fire department rA for the American Cancer
Society s Annual 'Relay For
connection.
• Double parking is always prohibited. �; C Life," at the Goldenwest College
• In a "No Parking" zone or blocking a building Ili track in Westminster on Friday,
III June 21, through Saturday, June
• Other than within a marked parking space. " •K 22. This is an 18-hour camping
RESTRICTED PARKING vigil to help raise money in the
Parking is restricted in the following areas: fight against cancer. We will be using the name
• In loading or unloading zones in excess of 30 "Royal Flush"just like we did in the MS Walk.
minutes of the posted time. Teams will consist of 10 to 15 people, who
• In reserved parking spaces for visitors. will each attempt to raise $100 in donations for
Authorized parking passes must be displayed this event. Each team member will participate in
on the vehicle's dashboard, the relay by walking, running, jogging, dancing
• In reserved parking places for disabled (or other creative means) around the track for 30
persons. minutes at a time.
3
The team registration fee is $10 per person. Engineering Hosts Staff
Registration begins at 7 p.m. on Friday and the g g
event ends at 12 noon on Saturday. Participants Seminar on Strafe IC Plan f'
can camp out in tents on the field, and
refreshments and all-night entertainment will be Nearly 70 staff members attended a luncheon
provided. seminar on Phase I of the Strategic Plan on May
An 11-minute promotional video about this 14. The program was hosted by the Engineering
event will be shown in the Board Room on May Department and included presentations by
29 at 2 p.m. Contact Patricia Magnante, ext. project consultants Carollo Engineers, and
3701, If you have any questions. Camp, Dresser and McKee.
Phase I consists of three projects: an
Employees Participate in investigation and repair of the Districts' ocean
Environmental Career Da outfalls, a study of our wastewater collection
system and ways to better manage peak flows,
More than 20 engineers, scientists and and a financial study that will determine an
environmental specialists from all over Orange equitable program of sewer connection fees and
County shared their professional expertise and annual user charges for both residential and
experience for the first Environmental Career Day commercial/industrial customers.
at McGarvin Middle School in Westminster on
May 3. lmotions*
Districts'employees who participated included
Bob Ooten, Pat McNelly, Chloe Dam, Mike The following employees were promoted during
Mengel, Tom Gerlinger, Jeff Armstrong, Sonja the last pay period. Congratulations!
Klick, Mark Tomko, Marco Polo Velasco and Kimberly Christensen - Laboratory
Mike McCarthy. From: Principal Laboratory &
As a result of the program, the 7th and 8th Research Analyst
graders, most of whom are Vietnamese, have a To: Laboratory Supervisor
better understanding of the many job Chuck Hodge -Source Control
opportunities in the environmental field. Chloe From: Associate Engineer III
Dec was particularly helpful because she was To: Engineer
able to bridge the language gap by giving part of
her talk in Vietnamese.
And special thanks to Craig Boyd, a Water p Service Awards 0
Quality Inspector for Allwest Geoscience in
Anaheim, who coordinated the event. Boyd The following employees celebrated their
contacted school officials last year with his service anniversaries during the last pay period.
proposal to recruit professional colleagues for a Congratulations!
student conference on environmental Five Years
employment opportunities. Maria Becerra Plant Maintenance
Alicia Fernandez Plant Maintenance
LE:MA Video Presentations
cheduled Next Week
The Communications Division will be showing
a video tape of the EMA presentation on The News Pipeline
competitiveness for all employees who were
unable to attend. The News Pipeline is published every payday by the
Video presentations will be held in the Board Communications Division for the employees, retirees and
P Directors of the Orange County Sanitation Districts.The deadline
Room on Wed., May 29 - 9 a.m. to 11:30 a.m.; for submitting news Items is the Wednesday before payday,
Wed., May 29 - 5 p.m. to 7:30 p.m.; and Thurs., Contnbutions are welcome!
May 30 - 1:30 p.m. to 4 p.m. Please contact Editor.................................................Patrick McNally(x206G)
Fawn Elizondo, ext. 0, and let her know which
showing you will be attending.
4
mEEnNo DATE: May 22, 1996 TM1E: 7:30 p.m. DR:TRIDTs: 1. 2. 3. 5. 6. 7. 11. 13 & 14
DISTRICT 1 JOINT BOARDS
IMORENO) ....... MC GUINAN ........ MERRY) ............. BOWMAN ......... he
(PERRYMCHAFERI ..... FERRYMAN ........ IHASTWOSI........... MOM ........... ✓ —_
ICOONRI .......... . MURPHY .......... (SCOTT) ............. COLLINS —
0,07761 . ...... ... . . SALTAREW ........ i7 IDEBAY) ............. COX . ..........
(STEINERI ...... .. . . . STANTON ......... JG (COX) ............... DEBAV ..........
(BELL) .............. GENES ......... 7
IBAUERI ......I...... DETTLOFF .........
DISTRICT 2 MARKER) . .... . ...... DUNLAP ..........
MISCOTTI .......... .. COLLINS ........ IDOWNEYI..... ....... ECKENRODE .......
ILUXBONI .. .. ..... T2RT ........... DERRYMCHAFFRI ...... FERRYMAN ........
(BELL) ........ . DENES ............ (ANDERSON) .......... FLOM .........
(PARKERI .. ...... .. . ECKENRDUNLAP........... (WELCIMARSH)
.......... GRIFFIN ........... _
(DOWNEY)........ .. . FLOM ... ........ (WARD) ............. IS HAMMONN ........
IANOERSONI .... .... . FLOM ............ f`L IBAER ............. HAMIG .. ........
(MORENDI ........ . . . MCOUIOAN ........ JI IBAUERI . ............ LINN . .... .......
(COONTLI ......... . . MURPHY .......... R.i IMINERIORKW ............. MC IGAN........
IBANKHEADI ......... NORBY............ f (MORENOI ............ MC PHY ..........
STEINEI........... . SINNER ...... roOONT21 ............ MURPHY .......... GL/
ISTEINERI .......... . STANTON ......... y7' (EVANGlANGHFAOI .......... RONERICE . ...........
IDALVI ............ . 2EMEL ............ L (EVANSI ............. SAL ............. —
IPoTTSI ............. eALTARELLI........
DISTRICT 3 (DOTSON) ...... ...... SAPIEN ...........
IDOTSON) ........... GAREN .......... . . 12LAKEn. ............ SINGER ...........
(PARKERI ........... WNLAP........... STEINERI ............. STANTON .............. 9E
IKERRVI ............ BOWMAN.......... ISTANTON) ...... 9NIER ..........
IMETING31.......... GROWN ........... IMILLEIO ......... .. .. SWAN............ —,
METING
............ COLLINS ......... IWAHLSMOMI ........ SYLVIA ...........
(ANDERSON) ......... FLOM ............ IGULUXS0N1 ..........
1WiL6N ...........
(MARSHALL) ......... GRIFFIN ........... IDALYI .............. 2EMEL ........... —
ISAUERI ............ IEInIO ........... . —
IMINERI ............ LWN .............
(MOREN01 ........... MCGUIGAN ...... ND ID
I IUI ........ NORBY.......... ANDERSON WOODRUFF
(EVANSI ............ RICE ............. .. ✓
BUY S ... L ANDRUS . ...
STEINE )ETI ........... SINNER .. ...... HODNES ... . LE ..
ISTEINERI ........... SYLVIA N ......... NOVEY .... BC LEE.. ......
IWAHLS111O.. ....... SYLVIA ........... "LIEJONK ..... J/ LWONIXON......
KYLE .... SHAW...... _
IDALYI ............. 2EMEL ............ L/ L
LINGER .... SHAW......
DISTRICT 6 LUDWIN ... e ST NE ..... _
ICOXI .............. DEBAY............ �(. MCINTYRE.. � x"wPlif-
ISTANTONI .......... BtaMBR'........... L7 MCNELLY .. .......... �
(DEBAYI ............ COX ............. 71 OOTEN .... -i�- .........._
PETERMAN ..........
DISTRICT 6 STREED ... 61 ..........
(COX) .SCRAPER) ..... FEMYIMN......... T L"S 7LE .. �, ........
:STANT N) ... ....... DEEM ............ WIIEATIFY .......... �_
ISTANTONI .......... 8£iNlN........... WILSON .. ..........
DISTRICT]
IWARD) ............ HAMMOND......... �R.tX� �
IPoTT61 ............ SALTARELLI ........
(COXI .............. DEMY............
(R2MYAiC11ARD1I ..... FERRYMAN.........
(MORENOI..... .. .... MUMMY N ........ _
ISTANTO ........ I . . MURPHY .
ISTANTONI ....... . . . 99LW1ET:..........
IBAUER) .......... .. E T F ......... ✓
M !b'NN✓�1
IVERI D L
.......... O ......... 'STANTON
(�I '
ISTEINER) ........... STANTONN .......
DISTRICT tf
WELCH) ............ GUWXBON .(DALYI 2EMEL........... .
I I ........... DUNLAP.......... . $/
ICOON2 ..........: MURPHY ..........
IBTANTONI ......... .BiH1aF.'......... .
DISTRICT 16
IPoTTSI .......... SALTARELLI ........ _
ICOONTDI ........... MURRIY ..........
(WARD) ............ HAMMOND...... ... _
ISTANTON) .......... INFIRM........... � J:1WP000MOIRECTORM102.
(MILLER) ............ SWAN . O:V27/96
PUBLIC SIGN-IN SHEET
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
May 22, 1996 BOARD MEETING
NAME ORGANIZATION/FIRM
Please Print Please Print
So
�/ CS [ ' ,
/ REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
LL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS ON SVCIF AGENDA ITEMS
OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND UBMIT THIS FORM
TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT BOARD MEETING.
A DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS E DEFERRED UNTIL THE
SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION D REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO
FIVE MINUTES.
DATE: AGENDA ITEM N0. lS
NAME: (PLEASE PRINT)
HOME ADDRESS: ;7_?l � �/� k'4d'(� y�1/�' J _-�2/7
/ NUMBER STREET
' G ITY ZIP u6DE
TELEPHONE: �o Q,p�,c/ �7`/a` c3� / //�,,
REPRESENTING: ��/
�`�g ' SELF OR NAME OF O ANIZ TION / ,
F28A
• REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THEI]$OA�ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS
OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD PLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM
TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMME CE ENT OF TH BOARD MEETING.
A DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS Y BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE
SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION AND REMARKS 4W BE LIMITED TO
FIVE MINUTES. >
DATE: AGENDA ITEM NO.
NAME: (PLEASE PRINT)
HOME ADDRESS: /v, IG S S A/'
/(/NUMBER TREET
iY VA Cl-A ? 2 ?off
G CITY ZIP CODE
TELEPHONE: �p ,3 �/35 S
REPRESENTING: div6 £ l OJ/-'��' G�/�/��C�}®z
SELF OR NAME OF ORGANIZATION
F28A
REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS
OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM
TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING.
AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE
SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION AND REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO
FIVE MINUTES.
DATE: 2- AGENDA ITEM NO.
NAME: (PLEASE PRINT)
HOME ADDRESS: 2 1L10S / ,� Q S7
NUMBER STREET
Las If_-G-'G� S
CITY ZIP CODE
TELEPHONE: 21.3 - ,J rJS-/S Co
REPRESENTING: LOGh� L SO/ - / t-N-IF
SELF OR NAME OF RGANIZATION
F28A
05/22/96 -JOINT BOARD MINUTES
#3 Receive and File Minutes
JC: We have an item in your agenda regarding the City of Tustin. We need a motion
to recognize Tom Saltarelli as the Active Director and Jim Potts as the Alternate
Director in Districts 1, 7 and 14. Any opposition? Okay, we'll consider that unanimous.
#4 -Annual Election of Chair and Chair Pro Tern
JC: This is the annual election of the Chair and Chair pro tern for each of the Boards.
We'll go through one by one and get your nominations.
District 1 - Pat you're back.
District 2 - John, you' back. Dan, although you're not with us tonight, you're back.
District 3 - Okay, Sal, you're Chair. How about chair pro tern -okay you've got two -
all in favor of Sheldon, raise your hands. Those in favor of Burnie Dunlap.
7 - Sheldon Singer/ 5 - Burnie Dunlap. Okay Sheldon, you're it.
District 5 -Jan you're it.
District 6 - Jim Ferryman -you're it. .
District 7 - Barry you're it.
District 11 -Victor- Okay - okay Shirley.
District 13 -We don't have a quorum in District 13.
District 14-Tom -okay - pro tem - Mark Murphy.
That takes care of it with the exception of District 13. We'll pick that up later if we get a
quorum.
#7(a) - Report of Joint Chair
JC: I would like to report that the Executive Committee met last Wednesday to revisit
the Consolidation issue of the Districts and the Pringle bill. The Committee agreed to
present this issue to the Directors at the June Board Meeting, so it will be coming up
and the minutes will be included in your next months' agenda packet. The Executive
Committee, which I'll mention again later is going to meet again in June and review the
final proposal to the Board because some additional questions have come up since our
last meeting. The OMTS Committee Chair, Pat McGuigan, has asked that the July 3rd
meeting be changed to July 11 th, immediately following the PDC Committee. I'm also
saddened to report another death that we had associated with the Districts. One of our
Senior Operations Supervisors, Rory Nelson, died yesterday in a scuba diving accident
in Mexico. Rory had been with the Districts for 18 years and he'll be missed by all of
those who knew him. Tonight, we'll be adjourning the meeting in his memory.
On a brighter note, I'm pleased to announce that on May 20th, the Districts received an
AMSA 1996 Research and Technology Award for our pilot digester project headed by
Associate Engineer, Michelle Fitzgerald and retired Scientist, Gregg Pamson. This
project evaluated the anaerobic digestion under controlled conditions and tested
alternative operating methodologies to increase methane gas production, control
hydrogen sulfide gas production and increase volatile solids reduction. Michelle
JAWPD0Ct6S\MIN96W0TES.05 Page 1
accepted the award for the Districts at the Spring Conference in Washington, DC.
AMSA presents this award annually to a member agency that produces a technological
innovation related to wastewater treatment or biosolids utilization and disposal. Again,
congratulations to both Michelle and Gregg.
Upcoming meetings: The Ad Hoc Committee regarding Space Utilization will be
meeting on May 29th at 5:30 pm; the OMTS Committee will meet on Wednesday, June
5th at 5:30 pm. It will begin with a tour of the two on-going research projects and the
dinner and business meeting are scheduled to start about 6:15 pm. The PDC
Committee will met Thursday, June 6th at 5:30 pm; and a tentative meeting of the Ad
Hoc Committee regarding Landfill Consultants Billings has been scheduled for June
11 th at 5:3Opm. It's anticipated that this will be a telephone conference call held in the
General Managers Conference Room and staff will provide additional information. This
is something that came out of discussion at the Finance Committee. The FAHR will
meet on Wednesday, June 12th at 5:30 pm; and the Executive Committee will meet
Wednesday, June 19th at 5:30 pm. The Steering Committee meets again the 26th at
5:30 pm and the next Joint Board Meeting meets following on June 26th at 7:30 pm.
#7(b) - Report of General Manager
DFM: I have three quick items. The first of them is an update on the EPA permit which
has been a bit elusive in the last five years. Blake is taking a few days vacation. He
and Nancy and some other staff members went to San Francisco to EPA last week and
I've asked Nancy to make a brief report on the outcome of that meeting which I think
you'll find to be very positive.
Nancy Wheatley: It was in fact a very good meeting. Blake, Mike Moore and I went up
to San Francisco to meet with Alexis Strauss (who is the head of Water for Region 9),
her staff, as well as some members of the staff of the Regional Water Quality Control
Board. Our permit is issued jointly by those two agencies. We had provided EPA and
the Regional Board with an update to our permit application, which if you'll recall was
submitted in 1989 and the major change that has occurred since that 1989 renewal
application was that our estimate of flows has gone down and we have done more work
in terms of recognizing the affect of water reclamation and water reuse on the amount
of discharge from our ouffall. What the reduction in flow means and the reduction in
discharges means is that we are discharging less on an annual basis and so we were
able to suggest lower permit limits could be applied to us. Limits within which we could
comfortable operate. As a consequence of that update, the EPA appears to believe
that they can in fact grant a continuing waiver based upon the regulations that are in
place. They have again turned their attention to our permit/renewal application and
they are working on what is called a tentative decision document or a TDD and a draft
permit. We discussed a possible schedule with them in which they would release this
draft TDD and the draft permit sometime early in August. There is a Regional Water
Quality Control Board Meeting on August 23rd and it is possible that there will be
workshop on the permit and the decision document at that meeting. Then, there would
be another Board meeting in September (Regional Water Quality Control Board
Meeting) at which it is anticipated that the permit would come up for renewal and the
J.'UPDOMBSUN98WOTES.05 Page 2
Regional Board does not approve the waiver only EPA does.Its possible that the final
action would be taken at either the September or October Regional Water Quality
Control Board Meeting. Between now and then, we are planning to do more work with
the public, particularly after the documents are released. However, the first thing we're
going to do is present some information at the June 13th meeting with the special
stakeholders for the strategic plan and at the back of the package that Michelle handed
you you'll find a couple of pages that have this tentative schedule and the guiding
principles for the permit which we developed with EPA and the Regional Board. We
would then probably meet with the stakeholders sometime between June 13 and the
release of the draft documents. We would have the workshop in August and then
probably have another workshop in September prior to that final board meeting. Again,
we did not identify any significant issues with the EPA. We will be working with them to
develop a new monitoring program which we anticipate will have considerably more
Flexibility. As I said, we're anticipating that the permit limits will be both reasonable and
meetable given the technologies that we now use.
DFM: Does any board member have any question of Nancy? This will obviously be a
matter that will be on-going and will be discussed at our Strategic Plan workshops and
as Nancy said, at the special stakeholder meetings that we're going to be having.
If you haven't received yet, you will be receiving from Michelle a packet of material
about the workshop.
Nancy Wheatley: I also have a copy of the letter that we sent to EPA if there are any
Directors that would like a copy.
DFM: I found out today, that we have had a complaint about dust that is partly
associated with a project where Newport Beach is building a water line over to Fountain
Valley and we've allowed them to do some staging in Plant 2. We did have a dust
complaint and we've rerouted those trucks and we think we've taken care of it. If you
receive any complaints, let us know and we'll take care of it.
The last thing I wanted to bring to your attention -you have received a copy of a memo
from Mike Peterman to me regarding the health benefits and vision plan that will be
discussed later this evening which I would like you to have a chance to glance at
before the item comes up to discuss.
#7(c) - Report of General Counsel
TLW: For information only purposes, there's a memo that was put into your packet
tonight on the federal legislative report and the real guts of that pertains to the very last
paragraph on the pending congressional action on amendments to super fund. As I've
noted in there, there was a real ugly U.S. Court of Appeals decision handed down a
couple of months ago which has got most every publicly owned treatment works scared
to death because of the potential liability and while it's a little bit different then the
Montrose situation the analogy is too close for comfort. In fact, while it's not in this
particular district of the federal court system, it could nevertheless be used as a
J:\WPDOC\BS\MIN96WOTES.05 Page 3
somewhat guideline or principle. .✓
There is a movement afoot and it seems to be gaining pretty good strength provided
that there's even a super fund bill get out of congress this year and that seems pretty
slim. But we're working seriously and we've been given a lot of favorable indicators
that the idea of protecting municipalities from further liability will be included. Just as a
side bar to that, I give you further update. A lot of your cities have been watching very
carefully the question of superfund immunity relative to solid waste disposal and landfill
sites and much to my surprise, I was able to learn in the last couple of days that there
has become a real groundswell of support in Congress to in fact, enact, some fairly
comprehensive immunity provisions and hold harmless provisions for municipalities on
solid waste disposal. That's assuming there not the active manager of the landfill but
for the average city that's just awarding the licenses for the trash. That effort is a
culmination of several years of by the National League of Cities, and all
sorts of organizations and we have constantly been running into just a solid wall.
Neither party has been willing to support any portion of that. But apparently, there has
been a major flip and the leadership in both parties and at both houses is endorsing it.
You'll be seeing much of that in your League of Cities Bulletins and I'll continue to keep
you advised as well.
On AB2109 the chairman just announced that they're watching it. We're keeping a very
close look at that, that's the bill that's going to create the Orange County Water and
Sanitation District. It's next to go to the Assembly Appropriations Committee. Right
now the date is unknown but it could happen on very short notice.
Lastly, I just learned today, that the trial judge has set a settlement conference on the
Montrose case, and that case was settled by a consent decree in which we and all the
other 200 municipalities got out a couple of years ago and that consent decree went to
the trial judge and he said it sounds like a good ideal to me (he never read it but he
signed it) and it went up on appeal and the court of appeals reversed him with a very
severe that he wasn't doing his job. So he took at that,
dismissed the whole lawsuit, and you'd have to know this trial judge, he's a legend and
many books have been and will be written about him and despite his creeping age of
85 years or something like that he continues to try to work, but there is a status
conference in a couple of weeks because the municipalities have put together the new
settlement agreement which doesn't call for contribution of any money but does gel the
case closed out. I'll keep you posted on that.
#8 -Approval of Minutes
JC: If there is no objection - I'll deem them approved.
Also, on the Supplemental Agenda, Districts 2, 3, 5, 6 and 11 we also have minutes
there to deem approved. Any objections? Approved.
#9 - Payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts
JAWPDOMBSUN96WOTES.05 Page 4
Roll Call Vote - motion carries.
#10 -Consent Calendar
JC: This involves District#7. Motion -and discussion, opposition? Consider that
unanimous.
#12 -Approval of Steerma Committee Minutes
JC: Regarding verbal report on the meeting of April 24. Since this a month old and
we've all discussed most of these items, I think I'll dispense with that but you do have
the meeting minutes. Just to highlight the points, we did discuss the agenda packages,
the Pringle Bill, landfill issues, the 1996/97 budget and the plan of adjustment. What's
more important is what we did tonight, just to give you a sense of what's going on we
discussed again the Pringle Bill, because it's still in process, several Directors have
suggested that we need to marshall more support to change the Pringle Bill because in
it's present form it is not appealing to most of us. As you may recall, we have written a
letter to Pringle saying that we would like it modified because certainly the spirit of
consolidation and reducing the number of special districts is valid but the way it's
presently constructed it doesn't really work out to be a practical bill. What I was
planning on doing was putting a letter out over my signature as Chair to the City's
outlining our position on this and encouraging the City's to also participate in some type
of lobbying effort to get this bill modified. I think we're looking for a constructive
solution. As you're aware, this District has been working towards a consolidation
process for sometime. We also were aware, based on the presentation made to us
recently about consolidation activities going on in South County and I think it's valuable
for Mr. Pringle to understand that there are efforts taking place here and there is
certainly cities and agencies that are trying to address this problem and not just shine it
on. We need to have more interest taken in this subject because if it isn't, we're liable
to have a Sacramento Bill designed for us without our participation and I don't think we
all like that kind of governance.
Comment could not be heard.
JC: They're looking for a recommendation. There has been a lot of discussion about it,
but a meaningful recommendation hasn't been put forth yet. That's why we need to sort
of gather the wagons and figure out what our meaningful recommendation is going to
be.
Comment could not be heard.
JC: No, the two recommendations that exist are our own efforts as I mentioned, we're
trying to put through and the one that's taking place in the South County. But, I believe
we have to put forth a more concerted effort to discuss this item.
Comment could not be heard.
JAWPDOMBSUNMNOTES.05 Page 5
JC: Let me come back to-That. Let me just finish this report on the Steering Committee.
We did talk about the Orange County COG tonight. Just to bring that up as you know,
that's in process. To give this board a heads up, it looks like that right now there are 16
cities that approved it so far, and I think they require 19 by population so it looks like
it's going to happen within the next week to ten days. If the JPA is formed, then the
formal agreement will come to this board to formalize our joining. As you know, we're
listed as a participant and ever since has been in place, we have been a
participant in some of these county discussions in the past, so presumably, we would
want to continue our participation in this process.
We did talk about the workshops, we've had some comments about the previous
workshops as how they might be done better. We sent out a survey which was very,
very helpful and we got valuable feedback and staff is evaluating ways of modifying in
response to those comments in the future workshops and we also suggested that the
Steering Committee be used as a sounding board so they can bounce some of these
ideas off of us before you all get them.
We also talked about the Committee Meeting in June, which I've already addressed. If
there are no other comments or questions, I need a motion to approve the minutes of
the Steering Committee. Opposition? Consider that unanimous.
REVISITED -#4 -Annual Election of Chair and Chair Pro Tern
JC: Now we'll move back to Item#4 with District 13 for nominations for Chair?
District 13 - John, you are reappointed as Chair- Okay, Bob is chair pro tem
#13(a)-fd) Report by Pat McGuigan, Chair of OMTS Committee
#14(a)-(c) Report by John Collins, Chair of PDC Committee
z
#15(a)-(h) Report by George Brown. Chair of FAHR Committee
JC: George will you give this report. Roger I know you were the one that was Chair of
this if you want to supplement it and staff can help supplement it too. What I did want
to announce here is that we did have a request to discuss item#15(e), so George, if
you don't mind, let's pull item#15(e) and hold that until later and just go through the
rest of them.
#15(g) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue Chance Order:
Question/Comment could not be heard.
DFM: Making an acoessment of the 21 closed sites became a bigger job than we had
anticipated. The good news is that they didn't find a lot of adverse problems at those
sites, but to do a complete job for our due diligence we felt that we had to test them all
and that's the consequence.
JAWPI)OMBSUN96W OTES.05 Page 6
Question/Comment coed not be heard.
JC: Yes, we had some progressive discussion on these. We did increase the budgets
on these as we went along starting from last July through now. Some of that, in this
case was really uncertain what we were going to uncover. We thought that for the work
that was done here, this is a fair price for this and we were aware of the progress.
DFM: The Clements Report was given to Jan Miltermeier last week, with the letter
asking for our$100,000 back thinking that maybe that might sweeten the deal a little
bit. No, not yet.
JC: Any other questions, on this item?
#15(c) Approving revisions to MPRP Performance Incentive Values:
Question/Comment could not be heard.
DFM: We have spent (and I don't know the exact amount) about $70,000 of staff time in
training to help people understand how to do objective, proper evaluations and so we
believe that while this will take a number of years to really get the right process we
think we're moving in the right direction and we need to start with serious training and
we've done that, in fact, that training will be completed this week. This not going to be
subjective and I hope not irrational and there will be a central clearing process to
ensure that one department or division isn't more generous and less objective than
others. So we think we've got controls built into the system.
JAW: The evaluations take a careful look at how the employee met their goals and
objectives which were in the workplan. That's agreed to before the beginning of the
fiscal year. The employee sits down with their manager or supervisor and goes through
those objectives that need to be accomplished and you have mutual understanding of
the measurable standard to which the employee will be evaluated.
Question/Comment could not be heard.
DFM: We'll be happy to have you join us for 8 hours of training if you want to do that.
Ultimately, any management system is a matter of trust. At sometime you have to
delegate and hold accountable and I don't think there is those kinds of technical built in
review systems in a lot of things that we do. I think they are essentially impossible. If
anyone would like to review our training materials, or be involved in the training we
would be delighted to share that with you, just to know how much time and effort we are
putting into this. We are taking this very seriously. It was a system that I inherited
when I came here, and we're trying to make it work. I think we're moving in that
JAWPDOCMAIN96WOTES.05 Page 7
direction. We can give,761,1 any kind of reporting that you wissas a consequence of
those efforts and would be happy to put on a demonstration at one of your meetings
about how the training is done. The background of the past evaluations, who gets them
and who doesn't and how the bar is placed for performance -that sort of thing.
JC: Okay George, I think (h) is self-explanatory, so it looks like your ready to make a
motion on (a)(c)(d)(f)(g)(h). Yes, you can call an abstention on any if you'd like.
Any opposition on (a)?
Any opposition on (c)? John Gullixson and Barry
Any opposition on (d)?
Any opposition on (f)?
Any opposition on (g)? John Gullixson / Bob/ Norby
Any opposition on (h)?
#15(e) Consideration implementing MetraHealth:
JC: This had to do with a change in the medical plan. On the agenda we call for a
resolution adoption, General Counsel has changed that because of the circumstances
we've gone through and it's really a motion authorizing the General Manager for a
MOU which you should have in front of you in your paperwork. To give you more
background, I'll have Don go over this.
DFM: This is an issue that at the outset looked to be a very favorable or very much of a
win/win situation for the Districts and for Districts employees because it was about a
$800,000 a year savings in health coverage and providing what I think most of us
would agree was a better quality of health coverage than we had experienced the last
year. The staff, in it's haste to put this item before the Committees, really did so without
touching base with the Board, and included in the package a $100,000 a year vision
coverage, which is a new kind of coverage or a much improved coverage for the
Districts. The Unions, because the specific name of the carrier or in the three MOU's,
with the three unions, we had to get their agreement to bring this forward and they all
three agreed.
At the meeting of the FAHR Committee, the Board members felt that with Union
negotiations coming up in the fall, moving ahead with a new major benefit such as the
vision care, was inappropriate and that would be something that would be more
properly negotiated at the time of our renewal of union contracts, they disapproved that.
The three union representatives, who are here tonight, want to speak to you about that
decision, and for that reason, as the Chair said, the item on the agenda has been
changed and so the fact is that we can't move this benefit forward without the unions
approval because of the way most contracts are written, which put us in an awkward
situation. It would be unfortunate for our employees, perhaps half of whom are
represented by the union. If we couldn't get the improved benefit at substantial
reduced costs to your constituents as well as to our employees. Having said that
J:NPDOMBSUN96WOTES.05 Page 8
though, 1 want to sugge*'now that the three persons that wanntto speak come forward
and make their comments to you and we can then have discussion following that.
Question/Comment could not be heard.
Mark Reid: I am here this evening representing the Association of Supervisory/
Professional Management Employees. What I have to say primarily deals with the area
of process because that's essentially what all of us are here this evening for and
frankly, how we conduct our business in the political arena. The process essentially is
that we have a contract, which the General Manager has spoken of this evening, with
all of the various groups, outlining the salaries, fringe benefits which they receive
during that contract period. You just adopted a motion, and I had asked to speak on
Item#15 in general and I apologize. For example, I think that there might have been a
typographical error in Item#15(c)(1), I believe the recommendation was 3% rather than
2%, but I'm here primarily to get into this area of process because I think this is a
typical example of probably what has happened.
The process of negotiation of the union contract is required by law and we have that
process that took place relative to the medical insurance program. Each of our
contracts specifies that we would review the medical plan at this time of the year and
see whether or not we could come up with a better plan as well as maybe something
less expensive for everyone. Let me say the employees are not terribly happy with the
insurance program that we currently have either. It is to the employees benefit, to look
for a different carrier and different benefits and so on. In doing that, management did a
great job frankly, of coming up with some ideal carriers at substantially less expensive
rates than what the Districts had been paying for, to a tune of nearly $1 million dollars
in savings to the Districts. That is rather substantial. I've been here doing this kind of
thing almost 28 years, and I don't think I've seen one yet where we've come up with a
savings quite as great as this. So nearly a million dollars is substantial. The
employees then said, if we're going to save a million dollars for you and obviously
something for us, then we ought to look at what is there for the mutual benefit of
everybody. The Districts and the management presented that they would put into the
package this optical coverage because it was something everybody needed and
wanted and so it was there. The employees of course, wanted the Districts to pick up
the entire cost of the medical insurance program, saving a million dollars would still
render a savings to the Districts of a half a million dollars or more and there would be
no cost to the employees. While we discussed that, we argued with it and we
negotiated and finally everyone said, we'll buy into this and there is a savings for
everybody but lets go ahead with it the way that it was proposed. So, there was an
agreement. I believe the agreement exists on the part of 501, OCEA as well and all of
the employee organizations members voted to decide whether that was appropriate.
That agreement then went on to your FAHR Committee, and that Committee decided
that it wasn't appropriate for whatever reason, to make that exchange and change of
J:%WPDOCtBS\MlN96WOTES.05 Page 9
benefit programs at this*me. What would happen if the employees said it's not
appropriate to make the exchange from the Districts side at this time? The Districts
wouldn't save a million dollars a year. It's kind of like holding a gun at somebody's
head and saying we want you to agree on the one side, but we're not going to agree
with you on the other side. The cost is rather minimal - one million dollar savings
versus $100,000 worth of cost on the Districts side. We're asking you tonight to not
adopt the recommendation that is here before you. Do not adopt that recommendation.
We would ask you instead to adopt the original recommendation which included the
agreement between management and the labor organizations. It wasn't one that was
shared happily on both sides totally, but it was one that was a negotiated agreement.
We would ask for you to do that. In the event that you would decide to do that, the
process hasn't yet concluded. That meet and confer negotiation process still has a
number of steps to go including the impasse process and of course we haven't even
begun since we've only reached the first process which was to try to reach an original
agreement, which of course we did. That would be our request, and I believe it is
shared by the other groups, but I'll let them speak on their own behalf.
Would you like me to indicate what my position was on Item #15(c)(1) or come up at a
later time?
JC: It's on the agenda here as 2%. It was originally recommended by staff at 3% and
it did go through the board review process and the committees felt that was too high
and reduced it. That's why it's that number, it's not a typo.
Mark Reid: I guess that again brings up my original premise relative to process. The
process is that we've got the cart before the horse. The negotiation process is suppose
to take place first, then the agreements and then to the Board for ratification and/or
approval. What has happened here appears to be kind of the reverse. For example,
this entire item of whether there is a merit pool, how much, what the criteria is, all the
rules and regulations, how people move, all of those things are subject to the meet and
confer process. So if you adopt something in firm concrete and we turn around say we
don't agree with that, we've got a problem on our hands all the way around. So, I'm not
suggesting to you that you not adopt something in premise, but when I saw the two
versions to three, I was shocked, because the last time we saw it in committee it was
agreed by everybody that it was three and two, and now we see it's two and two.
DFM: Mark is correct that this is out of sequence but I think that what is out of
sequence is the timing of the contract. We agree that it is a meet and confer item. On
the other hand, we had to have a board decision of how big the pool is going to be so
we could sit down with our employees at the beginning of the next fiscal year to say,
"how much is in that pool?", so that they would know in advance what a outstanding or
exceeds expectation award could be. So it's true, we're out of sequence here, and I
think in the next contract one of the things we will want to do is change the end date of
that contract so that we'll get back into the right sequence and have this done in
advance.
JAWPDOMBSUNIMNOTES.05 Page 10
Mark Reid: Don, I certay have no problem with that as you�Mnow. We've discussed it
by communication or by letter. The only problem that I have is just that the
understanding that the whole item including the amount is subject to the process and
therefore, we
JAW: I think that is clear on the agenda. This is a management proposal subject to
meet and confer. It specifically states that.
Mark Reid: I understand that. But management proposals are generally not adopted
by the Board in advance of discussions.
JC: Wait a minute. I think you're missing the point here. We're both making the same
point. You're union has the responsibility to ratify a decision and so does our board
have a responsibility to ratify a decision. All we're doing tonight is agreeing to a
decision that was recommended by a sub-committee, recognizing you have to ratify it.
This is not a done deal if you choose it not to be.
Mark Reid: I certainly understand.
Richard Brown: I am a Staff Representative for the Orange County Employees
Association. I'm here this evening representing three separate bargaining units here at
the Districts. the Administrative/Clerical Unit, the Engineering Unit and the Technical
Services Unit. I don't have a lot to say, I think Mr. Reid said it pretty well. We went
through the same process, we were contacted by the Districts a number of months ago
stating that there were a number of meet and confer items that at this time they wanted
to discuss with us, though our initial reaction was, as being contacted by the Districts,
we had some reservations about opening up our current agreement with the Districts
which expires in November of this year. In good faith, and I emphasize the good faith
part of it, we did sit down and we did discuss a number of items with the Districts
representatives and those items concerned health insurance, the changing of the
carrier, dental insurance and the changing of the provider, and providing a vision care
for the Districts employees. We thought in good faith, we came to an agreement with
the Districts representatives. What you have here before you this evening. Item 15(e),
is not that agreement and as Mr. Reid had said, the process has a number of additional
steps that we need to go through if indeed we're going to continue on this line. Again,
we would also request that you not adopt this item, and that you direct the Districts
representatives back to the bargaining table and we're prepared to start immediately on
further discussion on these items. Thank you.
David Hamilton: Local 501 Operating Engineers on behalf of the Operations and
Maintenance group. What the two previous gentlemen said is absolutely correct. It's
the same for all of us. We entered into an agreement with the Districts based on the
package that included a vision plan. If you don't want to do that, if you don't like the
plan, it seems to me that you're stepping over a dollar to get to a dime. You're sitting
here ruling tonight and you're talking about throwing away $100,000 here and
J:IWPD0CIBSWlN96W0TES.05 Page 11
$1,000,000 there talkinb'dig bucks. What we're talking abouYs one plan that will help
our membership your employees, it is something that will do good for them. According
to our calculations, which may be a little loose, about 75% of the people you represent
as Directors, the people in your District, already have a vision plan. We're asking for
the same thing - no more, no less. We are here to meet with the management in good
faith. I'd like to make a personal comment - it's been a long time since I've been before
this group and I think the management here has changed to 100% good direction. I'm
looking forward to an amenable negotiations this year. I hope that this is not indicative
of where we're going. We're here to negotiate for the membership. I'm not going to
pull any punches, we don't have any tricks. We just want to come in and negotiate a
contract and get it done. I don't think you have to be in the apprehensive situation
where you we're last year. We hired security people to look over what is going on. I
think you waste a lot of money in some areas that you don't need to. As far as
consultants and attorneys. You don't need an attorney in negotiations. We're going to
meet with you in good faith. Consider this tonight-this is not what we agreed to.
JC: We have had a lot of discussion about it too and I think you have to respect that we
have to agree and reach something as a Board. You're presentation is considering this
that you agreed and we didn't and therefore, we're suppose to buy it is a little unfair
from our prospective. We have a responsibility to our constituency. They have a
responsibility to evaluate these decisions,just as much as you do. So, we were not
trying to be disrespectful, as far as this process is concerned. Our interpretation was
the meet and confer was going to happen over the next three months for the next
contract. As this chart illustrates, the new item on the board, and I apologize for the
fuzziness of it -the new item to us was the vision of$99,000. That was not in the prior
contract, that was something that came out of the negotiations with the insurance
provider and we felt that was not fair to all of a sudden to say that's okay without going
through the meet and confer process as you're describing. So in effect, what we have
said is, "lets not do that, we'll do that later when we go through the meet and confer
process", we're not taking that off the table as far as future negotiations are concerned.
We're just not throwing it in as a freebie right now because we didn't view ourselves
going through these contract. Normally, we would have done this in Closed Session.
We would have had a lot of background and briefing on it. We didn't do that, primarily
because, this new insurance policy offers us the opportunity to save $50,000 a month.
Now, you may consider that peanuts, but we don't and that starts today. Now we could
delay this 90 or 120 days and lose $400,000 or we can save us all $50,000 a month by
making this quick decision. We thought that was very valuable, both for you as
employees and for our constituents. Now if you want us not to agree with that, that's
your choice. If you want to negotiate over the vision or whatever else you want to
negotiate over, we can do that. But tonight, the recommendation to this Board, is to put
forth the recommendation that we've described here and not put this vision expenditure
into the budget right now. That's why we came to this decision. Any other Board
member that would like to comment on this?
John Gullixson has requested that we go into Closed Session with this and that is fine.
J:\WPD0C\BSUNIN96\N0TES.05 Page 12
Comments could not beheard.
Mike Peterman: Are you talking about savings to employees specifically out of pocket?
In addition to the $138,000, the out-of-pocket expenses that they would save has not
been calculated, but it would be about 10% if your looking at increasing 90% coverage
up to 100%, that's in addition to the $138,000.
Comments could not be heard.
JC: We're putting ourselves, all of us, you and us, in a very untenable situation, trying
to negotiate. You're interruptions and your attitude in a public meeting trying to
negotiate your salary and your bonuses and everything is not the way to conduct
business. I have never done that before in my life in public office. We've got board
members that want to go into Closed Session and we'll make the recommendation.
Then we can go back and negotiate it, the way it is normally done, we're not going to
do it here. If you want to debate it out like this, to try to decide who's right, there's
going to be a lot of losers. If you have a statement to make, you're entitled to make it,
but I don't want to argue about it.
David Hamilton: Those are potential savings based on the fact that if the people opt
for the maxicare. They may not all opt for that so it may not come out that much
savings. What we entered into a tentative agreement, based upon this Board and
based upon the approval of our membership, what we agreed to was one thing. The
package that you have before you tonight is not what we agreed to ladies and
gentlemen. If you vote on it, you are voting on something that we did not agree on.
JC: Well we did not agree to your proposal, so we are making a counter proposal.
Comments could not be heard.
Richard Brown: Perhaps we could defer to the Districts legal staff. The Districts came
to the labor organizations, requested that the contracts be opened up. The labor
organizations agreed to open up the contracts. We did meet and discuss a number of
items. So here we are today, we have open contracts, we have no agreement pursuant
to the Districts rules and regulations there are further processes that need to lake place
and that's all we're asking you to do.
JC: I think we do have an agreement, we're asking that we change that agreement
because of an opportunity that came before us. So, to characterize it that there is no
agreement, this is not the case. There is an existing agreement, we think we have an
opportunity to do a better one. Anyway, we've discussed this enough, is there a
JAWPDOMBSUNMNOTES.05 - Page 13
motion? Yes, to o into g dosed Session? No opposition? Okay, we'll discuss it in
Closed Session.
TLW: I would advise, that under the provisions of the Brown Act 54957.6, you are in
fact authorized to go into Closed Session for purposes for meeting with your
management negotiating team to discuss the terms and conditions of wages, benefits
and other terms and conditions of employment. In my opinion, that the proposal
submitted to you by management exactly fits within the parameter of that provision of
the Brown Act then you are authorized to enter.
JC: Can we defer this Closed Session until we do go into Closed Session and continue
with the open session business.
#16 - Bay Side Drive Pump Station Sewage Spill
Nancy Wheatley: There is a summary of the action in your package. We have
received a complaint and a recommended penalty accessed against us by the Regional
Water Quality Control Board for the Bay Bridge Pump Station. We had an opportunity
to pay the penalty and not have a public hearing, however, in consultation with General
Manager and the Joint Chair, we concluded that it was important for any public who
wanted to have an opportunity to comment on the spill to have that opportunity. That
hearing will be held on May 31 st. It is stafrs belief that the $50,000 penalty is very
reasonable given the gravity of the spill that occurred. We have worked closely with
the residents and Michelle Tuchman knows the details of how many residents have
settled their claims.
We are also going to propose at the hearing on May 31 st that the amount of the
penalty go towards funding both the temporary and potentially the long-term solution at
the Bolsa Chica State Park so that the money we pay as a penalty stays in Southern
California to fix a real problem. The Regional Water Quality Control Board has to
accept that recommendation. We don't know if they will, but we are going to make that
recommendation.
JC: Motion? Discussion?
Discussion could not be heard.
DFM: I'm not sure if I can give you legislative history of that, but 1 can tell you that they
do it routinely and they've made it clear to me. I think it's a way to try to ensure
compliance with the laws with respect to clean water, but what they're hitting us on is
not the fact that we had a spill. What they're hitting us on is the fact we did not respond
quickly enough. They say we have a lot of spills but they don't always get fined. Its
the lack of quick response to the issue that they are unhappy about. I have to say,
given what they could have done legally, in terms of the amount of the fine, we got off,
I'd say relatively lightly, which is not to say that we like it, but if we could use those
JAWPDOMBSUIN95WOTES.05 Page 14
funds for under construe!!Ke purpose, like the Bolsa Chica Park problem, then I think
we would say we've gotten off very well.
I thought you were going to ask the question, "why we agree to have a public hearing',
and I think the staff felt and John agreed that if there are people that want to complain
about it, then they ought to have to do that and we didn't want to appear to not to be
allowing people due process if they're unhappy about the consequences of our actions
or in-actions.
Comments could not be heard.
JC: Okay, we have a motion and a second -any other discussion? Any opposition?
Motion passes.
#17 Proposed Ordinances - Increasing Sewer Connection Charges
JC: This is individual Districts. Tom, did you want to introduce these issues?
TLW: My comments would apply to all of the Districts. They are identical and in fact
there is a very brief memo in the agenda package from me noting the ordinances and
these were in fact reviewed by the FAHR Committee and then were brought to the Joint
Boards at your meeting last month and were reviewed at that time. The change is quite
nominal, it's noted in the staff report as well as mine. The connection charge for
dwelling units goes up $10.00 increase and then from $2,350 to $2,360. it's the first
move in four years and it's based upon the change in the ENR, that's the Engineering
News Record, which is the basic index that the Districts' have used for man years. The
Boards reviewed this and did recommend it and as I noted last month, if the Boards, in
fact, acted to make the adjustment last month, they there's a pro forma matter. We
bring the Ordinance back to get it implemented at this meeting. The adoption will be at
your next meeting in June and effective 60-days thereafter.
JC: We'll move them by individual District and if it's your pleasure, you can move the
item:
17(c) - District 1 - unanimous
17(d) - District 2 - unanimous
17(e) - District 3 - unanimous
17(f) - District 5 - unanimous
17(g) - District 6 - unanimous
17(h) - District 7- unanimous
17(i) - District 11 - unanimous
170) - District 13 - unanimous
17(k) - District 14- not applicable
JC: That completes Item#17 and with that we'll move into Closed Session.
J:IWPD0CtBSN41N96W0TES.05 Page 15
J:\WPDOC\BS\MIN96WOTES.05 Page 16
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
) SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, 1 hereby certify that
the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7,
11, 13 and 14 held on k�/J6 ___
Q
U 19f�l was duly posted for public
inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on 19�.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this a4aday of
Penny Kyle,Mcreta of each of the
Boards of Directors o County Sanitation
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14
of Orange County, California
BSIFoimslF M