Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-05-22 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA May 15, 1996 NOTICE OF MEETING ,honer JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS (714)9622411 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 n'aog Box d8127 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Fountain Vall,CA 927288127 West add...: WEDNESDAY. MAY 22, 1996 — 7:30 P.M. 108"Ellis Manua Fountain Valley,CA 927087018 DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Member The Regular Meeting of the Joint Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Agenci8s Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange Count California, will • 9 Yn clot.s be held at the above location, time and date. Anaheim T— arao Buono Park yprass Fountain Valley Fullerton B r e ary HunGngw Beach n Beach ruins Laebro to p Palms Leh Alamitos Tentatively - Scheduled UDcomina Meetinas Newporrtt Beach Crnnga Placentia Santa Are STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday, May 22, 1996, at 5:30 pm Seal Beach Stamm Tustin vale Park AD HOC COMMITTEE RE - Wednesday,May 29, 1996 AT 5:30 pm y.rbe Linda SPACE UTILIZATION County of Orange Sanitary Districts OPERATIONS,MAINTENANCE AND - Wednesday,June 5, 1996,at 5:30 pm TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE Caste Mesa Garden G}ays Midway City PLANNING, DESIGN AND - Thursday,June 6, 1996, at 5:30 pm Water nl.tricta CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE Irvine Ranch FINANCE,ADMINISTRATIVE AND - Wednesday,June 12, 1996,at 5:30 pm HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE A Public Wastewater and Environmental Man,gamenc Agency Committed to Protecting the Enwronment Since 1954 JOINT BOARD MEETING DATES Month Joint Board Meeting June Jun 26, 1996 July Jul 24, 1996 August Aug 28, 1996 September Sep 25, 1996 October Oct 23, 1996 November Nov 20, 1996 December Dec 18, 1996 January Jan 22, 1997 February Feb 26, 1997 March Mar 26, 1997 April Apr 23, 1997 May May 28, 1997 June June 25, 1997 AGENDA BOARDS OF DIRECTORS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 REGULAR MEETING MAY 22, 1996 - 7:30 P.M. ............. _......._............ ... ............ ... ... ._......... ... ... .._.._..------- ------ ......_..--"---._..__._.._.._._.__._.._.._._.._.._._., j In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the Districts'Administrative Offices not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. j In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Boards for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an j emergency item or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the attention of the Districts subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. i I i._.._.__._..._.__.__..........._..._..._.._....._........................_.._.._..._.._..._........_..._.._.._..._.._......_...___.._..._._.__.._.._.I (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll call (3) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders) (4) EACH DISTRICT Annual election of Chair and Chair pro tern of the Boards: (a) District 1 (f) District 7 (b) District 2 (g) District 11 (c) District 3 (h) District 13 (d) District 5 (1) District 14 (a) District 6 (5) Appointment of Chair pro tem, if necessary (6) Public Comments, All persons wishing to address the Boards on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot have action taken by the Boards of Directors except as authorized by Section 54954.2(b). 05/22/96 (7) The Joint Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. (a) Report of Joint Chair; consideration of Resolutions or commendations, presentations and awards (b) Report of General Manager (c) Report of General Counsel (8) EACH DISTRICT If no corrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair. District 1 - April 24, 1996 regular District 2 - April 24, 1996 regular District 3 - April 24, 1996 regular District 5 - April 24, 1996 regular District 6 - April 24, 1996 regular District 7 - April 24, 1996 regular District 11 - April 24, 1996 regular District 13 - April 24, 1996 regular District 14 - April 24, 1996 regular ALL DISTRICTS (9) Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vole differently for any District.) ALL DISTRICTS 04/17/96 05/01/96 MISC. Joint Operating Fund - $ 573,666.89 $305,327.31 $251,397.49 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 1,450,407.02 328,632.67 4.333.46 Joint Working Capital Fund - 161,155.48 279,915.93 0.00 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 5,043.93 71,860.61 93.221.91 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 894.00 2,526.70 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 2.007.16 25,755.01 423.00 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 9,541.80 963,295.90 90.00 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 177.00 5,550.48 538.13 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 24,115.00 1,189.01 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 882.80 9,780.91 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 5,097.40 8,534.00 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 13 - 0.00 35.61 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 14 - 0.00 506.93 0.00 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 243,282.06 147,226.53 0.00 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 0.00 213.52 0.00 DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 0.00 16.71 0.00 $2.476.270.54 $2.150.367.83 $350,003.99 -2- 05/22/96 r CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 10 _..._.._..._.._.............................................................................._......_.................._......._........ ..._.._.._.._.._..._.._..._.._.._.._ I All matters placed on the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or i further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the i consent calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there i l will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions i i included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be i considered in the regular order of business. i i Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon i recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by number the item to be j removed from the consent calendar. ! i I The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. I i Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: DISTRICT 7 (10) Consideration of Resolution No. 96-53-7, approving agreement with County of Orange providing for the adjustment of manholes on District sewers in conjunction with the County's 1995-96 street resurfacing program in unincorporated County areas within District No. 7, and providing for payment of the actual cost of the manhole adjustment plus 10% for inspection and administrative costs for approximately 70 manholes, at a per-manhole unit cost not to exceed $220.00 nor be less than $155.00 per manhole; and authorizing payment of required deposit of $13,650.00 for said work. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR ALL DISTRICTS (11) Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any -3- 05/22/96 NON-CONSENT CALENDAR ALL DISTRICTS (12) (a) Receive and file draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on April24, 1996. (b) Verbal Report by Chair of Steering Committee re April 24, 1996 meeting. (13) (a) Receive and file draft Operations, Maintenance, and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on May 1, 1996. (b) Verbal Report by Chair of Operations, Maintenance, and Technical Services Committee re May 1, 1996 meeting. (c) Consideration of the following actions relative to Amendment No. 1 to agreement with SAIC for Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for Districts' 120-inch Ocean Outfall, Specification No. P-156R, providing for an extension of the contract from July 1, 1996 through June 30, 1997 (OMTS95-033b): (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee certification of the negotiated fee for said additional services. (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 96-51, approving Amendment No. 1 to said agreement with SAIC for Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for Districts' 120-inch Ocean Outfall, Specification No. P-156R, extending the contract from July 1, 1996 through June 30, 1997, for an amount not to exceed $1,474,098 for said time period. (d) Consideration of motion approving Billing Agreement with Southern California Gas Company as Districts' agent to facilitate billing for amounts due to Districts for compressed natural gas dispensed from Districts' refueling station, at a cost of$.20 per transaction, cancellable on ten days written notice (OMTS95-041 d). (14) (a) Receive and file draft Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on May 2, 1996. (b) Verbal Report by Chair of Planning, Design and Construction Committee re May 2, 1996 Meeting. (c) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to issue a purchase order to ADS Environmental Services, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $131,300.00 for Dry Weather and Wet Weather Flow Monitoring Services (PDC96-18). 4- 05/22/96 r ALL DISTRICTS (15) (a) Receive and file draft Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on May 8, 1996. (b) Verbal Report by Chair of Finance, Administrative and Human Resources Committee re May 8, 1996 Meeting. (c) Consideration of motion approving the following revisions to MPRP (Management Performance Review Plan) Performance Incentive Values [The following are management proposals to be considered as part of the meet-and-confer process] (FAHR96-26): (1) Establish a Target Merit Pool Fund of 2.0% of payroll for implementation in July 1997, as a non-base building bonus for performance that exceeds expectations or is outstanding. (2) Provide for market adjustment not to exceed 2.0% of payroll or CPI for Los Angeles-Anaheim-Riverside, whichever is lower. (d) Consideration of motion to receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of March 1996 (FAHR96-27). (a) Consideration of Resolution No. 96-52, amending Resolution No. 95-105, implementing MetraHealth Point-of-Service medical plan effective July 1, 1996, to fund dependent medical premiums at 80% and employee only coverage at 100%; and, to convert self-funded dental insurance to fully- insured program through Delta Dental (FAHR96-28). (f) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to place Comprehensive General Liability and Excess Liability Insurance for the period July 1, 1996 to July 1, 1997, with the California Municipal Excess Liability (CAMEL) Program in an amount not to exceed $125,000.00 (FAHR96-31). (g) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue Change Order No. 2 to Purchase Order No. 74798 issued to Clements Environmental in connection with the County Landfill Acquisition, providing for additional technical review of the County's closed landfill sites and solid waste industry analysis, in the amount of$69,945.28, increasing the total authorized amount from an amount not to exceed $100,000.00 to an amount not to exceed $169,945.28 (FAHR96-33). (h) Consideration of motion to receive and file Third Quarter Financial and Operations Report dated March 31, 1996 (FAHR96-34). -5- 05/22/96 ALL DISTRICTS (16) Consideration of the following actions re Bayside Drive Pump Station Sewage Spill on February 22, 1996: (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Report dated May 15, 1996. (b) Consideration of motion to receive and file Administrative Civil Liability Complaint No. 96-3 issued by California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region, relative to the Bayside Drive Pump Station Sewage Spill on February 22, 1996. (17) Consideration of the following items re introduction of proposed ordinances increasing sewer connection charges (FAHR96-25): (a) Report of General Counsel re proposed Ordinances (b) Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Report dated April 10, 1996 re proposed Ordinances. (c) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 130, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Amending Section 702 of Ordinance No. 119 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations Relating to Increased Capital Facilities Connection Charges: (1) Consideration of motion making finding that adoption of said Ordinance is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and Public Resources Code 21080(b)(8) in that the Ordinance is a regulatory action taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment; and the increased revenues to be received by the connection charges will be used to reimburse the District for capital projects which have been, and will be, constructed and which are necessary to maintain service within the existing defined service areas of the District, as set forth in the comprehensive Master Plan. (2) Consideration of motion to read said Ordinance No. 130 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance (must be approved by unanimous vote of Directors present). (3) Consideration of motion to introduce said Ordinance No. 130 and pass to second reading and hearing on June 26, 1996. -6- [ITEM (17) CONTINUED ON PAGE 7] 05/22/96 r (17) (d) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 222, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, Amending Section 702 of Ordinance No. 214 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations Relating to Increased Capital Facilities Connection Charges: (1) Consideration of motion making finding that adoption of said Ordinance is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and Public Resources Code 21080(b)(8) in that the Ordinance is a regulatory action taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment; and the increased revenues to be received by the connection charges will be used to reimburse the District for capital projects which have been, and will be, constructed and which are necessary to maintain service within the existing defined service areas of the District, as set forth in the comprehensive Master Plan. (2) Consideration of motion to read said Ordinance No. 222 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance (must be approved by unanimous vote of Directors present). (3) Consideration of motion to introduce said Ordinance No. 222 and pass to second reading and hearing on June 26, 1996. (e) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 325, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, Amending Section 702 of Ordinance No. 317 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations Relating to Increased Capital Facilities Connection Charges: (1) Consideration of motion making finding that adoption of said Ordinance is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and Public Resources Code 21080(b)(8) in that the Ordinance is a regulatory action taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment; and the increased revenues to be received by the connection charges will be used to reimburse the District for capital projects which have been, and will be, constructed and which are necessary to maintain service within the existing defined service areas of the District, as set forth in the comprehensive Master Plan. (2) Consideration of motion to read said Ordinance No. 325 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance (must be approved by unanimous vote of Directors present). (3) Consideration of motion to introduce said Ordinance No. 325 and pass to second reading and hearing on June 26, 1996. -7- [ITEM (17) CONTINUED ON PAGE 8] 05122/96 (17) (f) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 534, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Amending Section 702 of Ordinance No. 526 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations Relating to Increased Capital Facilities Connection Charges: (1) Consideration of motion making finding that adoption of said Ordinance is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and Public Resources Code 21080(b)(8) in that the Ordinance is a regulatory action taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment; and the increased revenues to be received by the connection charges will be used to reimburse the District for capital projects which have been, and will be, constructed and which are necessary to maintain service within the existing defined service areas of the District, as set forth in the comprehensive Master Plan. (2) Consideration of motion to read said Ordinance No. 534 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance (must be approved by unanimous vote of Directors present). (3) Consideration of motion to introduce said Ordinance No. 534 and pass to second reading and hearing on June 26, 1996. (g) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 628, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Amending Section 702 of Ordinance No. 620 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations Relating to Increased Capital Facilities Connection Charges: (1) Consideration of motion making finding that adoption of said Ordinance is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and Public Resources Code 21080(b)(8) in that the Ordinance is a regulatory action taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment; and the increased revenues to be received by the connection charges will be used to reimburse the District for capital projects which have been, and will be, constructed and which are necessary to maintain service within the existing defined service areas of the District, as set forth in the comprehensive Master Plan. (2) Consideration of motion to read said Ordinance No. 628 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance (must be approved by unanimous vote of Directors present). (3) Consideration of motion to introduce said Ordinance No. 628 and pass to second reading and hearing on June 26, 1996. -8- [ITEM (17) CONTINUED ON PAGE 9] 05/22/96 ALL DISTRICTS 1 CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on I this agenda as a regular meeting of the Boards,the Chair may convene the Boards in closed session to consider matters of pending real estate i negotiations,pending or potential litigation,or personnel matters,pursuant to i Government Code Sections 54956.8,54956.9, 54957 or 54957.6.as noted. i Reports relating to(a) purchase and sale of real property;(b)matters of I pending or potential litigation; (c)employment actions or negotiations with i employee representatives;or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act,may be reviewed by the Boards during a I permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such i time as final actions are taken by the Boards on any of these subjects,the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. I (a) Convene in closed session, if necessary (b) (1) Confer with General Counsel re status of litigation, Patterson v. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court Case Nos. 738179, 738622 and 741371 (Government Code Section 54956.9[a]). (2) Confer with General Counsel re status of litigation, Louis Sangermano v. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 732680 (Government Code Section 54956.9[a]). (c) Reconvene in regular session (d) Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session (19) Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (20) Matters which a Director would like staff to report on at a subsequent meeting (21) Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff report (22) DISTRICT 1 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (23) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn _11_ asr22/96 (24) DISTRICT 2 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (25) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn (26) DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (27) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn (28) DISTRICT 5 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (29) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn (30) DISTRICT 6 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (31) DISTRICT Consideration of motion to adjourn (32) DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (33) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn (34) DISTRICT 11 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (35) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn (36) DISTRICT 13 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (37) DISTRICT 13 Consideration of motion to adjourn (38) DISTRICT 14 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (39) DISTRICT 14 Consideration of motion to adjourn _12_ O5122/96 .............................._........................................_..— —.._..._.._.._._..—..-........................................_.................._............. : NOTICE TO DIRECTORS: To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Joint Boards, Directors shall submit items to the Board Secretary not later than the close of business 14 days preceding the Joint Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on the agenda all items submitted by Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and all formal i i communications. Board Secretary: Penny Kyle (714) 962-2411, ext. 2026 Secretary: Patricia L. Jonk (714) 962-2411, ext. 2029 i Secretary: Janet L. Gray (714) 962-2411, ext. 2027 -13- J:%wvoocesAGWWrsswas.wpo " -� COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA May 15, 1996 phone: (714)962-2411 To the Chair and Members mailing address: of the Joint Boards of Directors P0. Bm 8127 Fountain valley.cA 9272"127 Subject: Board Letter street add.: 10844 His Averse Fountain Valle,CA The following are items that you may find interesting. If you need additional 92708 701 B information on any of the items, please call me. Change to Agenda Package Member At the April Steering Committee meeting, staff was authorized to change the agenda Agencies package for a trial 90-day period. Beginning with this agenda, only the summary • reports for action items that were unanimously approved by the working committees Cities will be included with the Joint Boards agenda backup information. If you desire Anaheim additional information on any item, please contact the person indicated in the Brea summary report. Staff is continuing to evaluate this process and additional Buena Park recommendations will be forthcoming. Lypress Foumeln Valley Fullerton Santa Monica Bay Restoration Project Huntington Beach tyros Le Habra Attached is an article from the L.A. Times on the water quality of the Santa Monica Le Palma Bay. The Districts participated in the Santa Monica Bay Restoration Project by Los Alamitos collecting and analyzing samples for human enteric viruses. The Long Beach State Newport Beech orange Foundation provided funding for eight students who drove to three sites every Placentia weekend between June and September, took samples and then returned the San.A.Seat Be samples to the Districts. Districts' employees performed the analyses. S[encon r 5°n Harassment Policy Villa Park lbrba Linda The attached memo dated May 8, 1996, reaffirms the Districts' Harassment Policy. It County of orange was sent to all employees as a reminder that harassment of any kind will not be tolerated at the Districts, and advising them of their rights. The more we stress senits^' Diatriots these policies, the more aware our employees will be regarding this issue. Costa Mesa Gerson Grave California Regional Water Quality Control Board Administrative Civil Liability - MldwayCity Complaint No. 96-53 water Districts Irvine Bench As you may know, the Districts has received a Complaint from the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) assessing Administrative Civil Liability for the sewage spill on February 22, 1996, which resulted from the failure at the Bay Bridge Pump Station. The Complaint charges the Districts with violating the California Water Code and provisions of our NPDES (National Pollution Discharge Elimination System) ocean discharge permit by spilling sewage into homes and into Newport Bay. A maximum fine of$410,000 was possible under the provisions of the Water Code, but the RWQCB assessed a fine of$50,000. In determining the A Public Wastewater and Environmental Management Agency Committed to Prohoc ing the Environment Since 1954 Chair and Members of the Joint Boards of Directors Page 2 May 15, 1996 amount of the fine, the RWQCB took into consideration the Districts' long history of outstanding compliance, the Districts' response to the residents who were affected, and other factors allowed by the Water Code. Staff discussions between the two agencies indicated that the RWQCB's most significant concern was that the Districts' staff did not take immediate action after receiving the alarm from the pump station; something they felt could be indicative of inadequate training. The Districts has addressed this issue in its follow-up with the RWQCB. A hearing on the Complaint is scheduled for the RWQCB's regular meeting on May 21, 1996. The Complaint allows the Districts to waive the hearing by paying the fine before May 17. Staff believe that the Complaint and the amount of the fine are reasonable, indeed very low, given the seriousness of the spill. Nevertheless, staff is uncomfortable recommending payment of the fine in order to avoid the hearing. If there are members of the public who wish to address the RWQCB on the matter, preventing the hearing will leave those people without an opportunity to participate in the process. While the public can submit written comments without a hearing, those comments would not be considered by the RWQCB in a public forum. Joint Board Chair Cox and the General Manager decided that the Districts should not waive the opportunity for a public hearing. Staff will be present at the hearing to discuss the seriousness of the incident and indicate that the Districts do not oppose either the substance of the Complaint or the amount of the fine. Staff will also respond to questions from the RWQCB and the public if appropriate. CSDOC'S General Information Sheet Attached is a FY '95-96 general information sheet which provides pertinent facts and key statistics on operations/treatment and financial information on the Districts. Results of the Internal Communications Audit An Internal Communications Audit was conducted earlier this year to gauge employees' perceptions, concerns, morale and attitude. Some 260 employees responded to the audit, the largest number of respondents to any employee survey. We believe this response rate emphasizes the importance employees place on communications. Audit highlights include the following: - nearly 80% agree to some extent with the statement, "We've gone through some tough years at the Districts, but I think things are improving." - when asked if they believe "Morale at the Districts is improving,' about 50% agree to some extent while approximately the same number disagree. a Chair and Members of the Joint Boards of Directors Page 3 May 15, 1996 - nearly 80% feel communications at the Districts is improving. - 66% agree to some extent that"the Districts cares about me and what I think." - 95% say the Districts is a good place to work. - employees say the Districts' mission, goals and objectives have been clearly communicated to them. - supervisors, managers and department/division meetings are employee's first choices for accurate, reliable information. The Internal Communications Audit will be conducted again in January 1997 and the results compared as a benchmark to the effectiveness of our employee communications' program. A copy of the survey results is attached. Ad Hoc Committee To Review Saybrook Capital Inc. and Price Waterhouse Billinas Meeting tentatively scheduled at the Districts for June 11, 1996 at 5:30 p.m. To be confirmed. If you would like additional information on any of the above items, please call me. Dona dl F. Mclntyre General Manager DFM:cmc J%W DOO1GM FMIB OLTAIB 522% Attachments: L.A. Times Article re: Study of Santa Monica Bay Harassment Policy Memo dated May 8, 1996 RWQCB Letter re: Administrative Civil Liability dated May 1, 1996 Districts' FY '95-96 Pertinent Facts and Key Statistics Sheet Results of Internal Communications Audit ORANGE COUNT Y 5AN11 A I IUN UI51 Nil: I ci NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS Name of Paper Section Page Dale Saber fa Times Frohf A3 5-7- 5 & Sc,ngr- r�cn ; cct /3ay Study of Santa. Monica. Bay.. mks Drams and Illness 4JAMf5 ecdotal evidence that Los An- es srsrr warrsa r. geles most.popular recrea- 't >��• Uonel -resoinrx'+makes some RAn unprecedented health 1 people sick me - ' Krvey. shows':.that t Santa: . But the Santa Monica Bay onica Bay.beach-goers who Bastoration Project and other n`,�m near storm'drams are sponsors said the exhaustive . almost 50%. more likely toy' survey of swimmers gives rea +:lwntract 'colds, sorejthmatsj son for some optimism,'since` - tdferrhea'-and other illnesses; the risk_of illness decreases' ' "than those who.swim:farther,_-_dramatically:for -those -who - away in cleaner water. swim 100 yards or more from -Scheduled to he released to- the dozen drains that typically i nay,the research by USC epi' < empty into the bay ye,ar-round ! demiologist Robert-W.-11afe, Swimmers outside the drain-. I cord ms for the firsttime'an- ` 'Please see BAY,AN BAY: Study Says Runoff Makes Swimmers III Continued from A3 Steve Saylurs,a captain with the agency. age areas were tar less likely to fall ill, nI'a1118ge Researchers believe that their results he, ?erhaps tittle more than if they had swum in a identified a pollution measure that will 1 ?col or stayed out of the water altogether. Problems more useful,in the future,in predicting wht "The good news is that, of the bay's the ocean is unhealthful. 50-plus-mile coastline, less than two miles Santa Monica Bay beach-goers who In the past, public health officials liar are problematic;'the report said. swim near storm drains face a relied heavily on measuring the cancer The Sane Monica Bay Restoration Proj- Vatlon of colitorms, ubiquitous bacteria pit act—a consortium of cities, businesses, envi- significantly higher risk of becoming sent in lawn clippings, -onmental Bo g III than those who swim farther away ppioth pet droppings,home groups and government agencies— in cleaner water.Here are the � waste and many other plants and animal :ommissioned the survey as one of the prior- approximate locations of storm drains Because many of those sources are m '.ties in its five-year plan to clean up the bay. that typically now year-round into associated with human diseases, howeve The epidemiology study,the first of its kind the ooeam high coliform readings do not always men 'n the nation, surveyed 15,492 people who 1.Malibu Creek and Lagoon,Malibu high risk to swimmers. went into the water last summer at three 2,Topanga Creek,at Topanga Canyon Haile a study found,however,that illness ocations—Surfrider Beach in Malibu, Will far more likely when a high percentage of th 3ogers State Beach in Pacific Palisades and Boulevard bacteria comes from human waste. Virtue Monica State Beach,one mile south of 8.Santa Monica Canyon, 50% or more of the coliforms were fec: he Santa Monica Pier. Interviewers reached Chautauqua Boulevard andd West coliforms,the number of swimmers contract Host of the participants a week or two later to Channel Road g 4.Montana Avenue,Santa Monica in respiratory illnesses more than doubled. letermine how many had become ill. The survey does have its limitations. In response to the survey's findings, late S.Santa Monica Pier S.Windward Avenue,Santa Monica Angeles County signs to are printing more 7,Windward Avenue,Venice Because it was intended to link publt '.daim, and signs m he placed near storm S.Ballona Creek,Marina del Rey health to water quality on particular day: Tams, and county lifeguards are pledging m 9,28th Street,Hermosa Beach swimmers who went in the ocean more the .sue stronger admonitions against swimming 10.18th Street,Hermosa Beach once in 10 days were not questioned. It th n polluted waters.The findings also could push 11.Herondo Street,Redondo Beach frequent swimmers had become W, inter head stalled talks among 85 cities on how but 12.Avenue I,Redondo Beach viewers would not have been able to link th o dean urban runoff that Rows uto drains and yrota:a rem year ouM stem Grain at the dasea sickness to a particular locale and polludo: hue into lire bay. me aamaamd in show mamas aueady tadirened condition,researchers said: to a sewage pant,omerthan turingdheany into That meant that the survey necess il; Cl aile suggested that the study may have the«can. excluded surfers and lifeguards. "The pre Cl national implications. souse:sane mono say Restoration Piatea sumption would be that those people are at "There are a lot of beaches subject to urban higher risk from additional exposures,"Hall, unti Haile said. "Are those beaches hav- - said. "There is a chance, on the other hand ng some trimmed risk? The answer is as a control group,it found that the levels of that they would build up immunities. But robably yes,because the beaches we studied Wheat dropped off dramatically even 100 doubt that, because you would have to bush an not unique." up resistance to so many different pathogen. Swimmers and surfers long have reported yards from the mouths of the drains. in the water." *etting sick after plunging into the surf from Too few swimmers were questioned in the Researchers did not examine possible be falibu to Torrance. Researchers had con- study compare the relative risks at the health effects on people who wade in of =ad that pollution,including human waste, three beaches. Malibu Surfrider, which re- otherwise did not put their faces into tht owed out of some storm drains.But without chives runoff from Malibu Creek, generally water,nor did they study any of the dozens it health survey, the source of the illnesses had the highest levels of contamination. urban storm drains that only Bow into th< Pending an announcement today,results of ad never been confumof ocean during the rainy season. Health otfi. the study have been closely held. Haile enlisted dozens of college students last But officials at the Los Angeles County MalBhave long recommended against swim- umner to comb the three beaches,interview- Department of Health Services already have min in the bay for at least 48 hours after rg anyone who had put their face underwater significant rainfall. i either the ocean or at various points new been billeted and have begun printing signs Santa Monica Bay Restoration Project offi. arm strums. water stms. A control group of that will be pasted near storm drains. They cials already are suggesting more studies wbnmem was interviewed about 400 yards us more emphatic than previous messages, perhaps of surfers and lifeguards, targeting way from the drains, locations at which the said Catherine Tyrrell, executive director of the health effects of repeated exposure « :vets of bacteria and human viruses usually the Santa Monica Bay Restoration Project. polluted waters. we found to be negligible. The new signs say:"Warning!Storm Drain The organization also is urging that the The study found that those who swam near Water May Cause Illness. No Swimming." research be used to bolster efforts to investi- re drains were well over 50% more likely to Previously, the signs cautioned bathers that gate and eliminate the sources of storm water after fever or vomiting, for example, than storm water "may be contaminated" and pollution.That might Include the diversion of rose who kept their distance from the urged no swimming. Health officials have some polluted runoff to sewage treatment alluted runoff. agreed to post Bags new the signs to attract plants, where disease-causing organisms In raw numbers,the survey projects that 373 the public's attention. could be eliminated, before discharging the every 10,000 people (about 4%) swimming The warnings also will be printed in effluent into the ocean. ear drains will contract at least one symp- Spanish, an important consideration because _i.en A eles City Council members Ruth �m—cough. ear ailment, ere throat, fever, the survey found that Latinos, particularly Ga enter an Mrchae suer are woe rills or some gastrointestinal disorder. children,are more likely to swim in and near o ay tl'7T oinuroatice a motion ca "To put it another way, that means that if the polluted water. Officials speculated that -rver i ater [u the cny s ru bring a classroom of 25 kids out there to the difference in usage of the contaminated shwa a reatmen a [ an requesting vim in that polluted water, one of them is water might be linked to the dearth of crease tan [nil or im is education. ring to gel at least one of these symptoms," publicity in the Latino community about Activists such as Heal the Bay's Gold said .td Mark Cold, executive director of the storm water pollution. they hope that the findings will help 85 cities ivirunmental group Heal the Bay and a While county lifeguards will not order in the county come to some agreement on a •iving force behind the study. bathers out of polluted areas,they plan to"do plan to clean up the drains. That plan is due While the survey used the swimmers [their] darndest to keep the people from for adoption July 15 but has been staged by rarly a quarter of a mile from storm drains playing or swimming in that water." said bickering among the cities. D b May 8, 1996 ME MORANDU TO: All Districts'Employees FROM: Donald F. McIntyre General Manager SUBJECT: HARASSMENT POLICY It is the policy of the Districts to maintain a place of employment and a work environment that are safe, productive, and free from general and sexual harassment. The Districts will not tolerate any form of harassment. If you believe you are a victim of sexual or general harssment(see policy below), please report such incidents to management immediately. Harassment or retaliation against those who report. or are victimized by, such harassment will be subject to serious disciplinary action. Over the next few years, additional training in recognizing and preventing sexual and general harassment will be required. The following is a restatement of the Districts' policy: The Districts will not tolerate sexual harassment in the workplace. Sexual Harassment may include, but is not limited to, any of the following: 1. Sexual favors. Unwanted sexual advances which condition an employment benefit upon exchange of sexual favors. 2. Hosdle work environment. Sexually-based verbal,physical or visual harassment of such a nature and intensity that it creates an intimidating, hostile or offensive working environment. Conduct that may result in a hostile work environment includes, but is not limited to, the following: A. Sexual epithets,jokes, derogatory comments orslurs; B. Assault, impeding or blocking movement, or any physical interference with normal work or movement when directed at an individual on the basis of sex; C. Sexual cartoons, drawings,photgraphs or derogatory posters. Any employee who believes that he or she has been the victim of sexual harassment should immediately report the matter to his or her supervisor or manager, or to any other supervisor or manager, including the General Manager. Complaints of sexual harassment will be promptly investigated, and appropriate connective action will be taken. MP CSDOC 0 P.O.Soz 8127•Fountain Valley,CA 9272M127 0(714)952-2411 STATE OF CALIPORNIA ALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PETS WILSON. G.. CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER DUALITY CONTROL BOARD - SANTA ANA REGION V37 MAIN STREET. SUITE S00 RIVERSIDE, CA 925Dn3339 PHONE: (909) M413D FAX: ( 091 781.6200 May 1, 1996 Mr. Donald F. Mcintyre CERTIFIED MAIL General Manager RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P.O. Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708-7018 ADMINISTRATIVE CIVIL LIABILITY - COMPLAINT NO. 96-53 Dear Mr. McIntyre: Enclosed is a certified copy of Complaint No. 96-53 for Administrative Civil Liability regarding the discharge of sewage to Newport Bay on February 22, 1996. A public hearing on this matter has been scheduled for the May 31, 1996 Regional Board Meeting at the California Tower, Highgrove Room (Room No. 200), 3737 Main Street, Riverside, California. The staff report concerning the complaint and a meeting agenda will be mailed to you prior to the hearing. If you choose to waive your right to a hearing, please sign the enclosed waiver form and submit it to this office prior to May 17, 1996 with a check or money order for the proposed amount of civil liability ($50,000.00). The check or money order should be made payable to the State Water Resources Control Board. If you do not wish to waive your right to a hearing, we would suggest scheduling a pre- hearing meeting at this office prior to May 17. At that time, you may wish to submit information that may not have been previously available to staff regarding these incidents. This information should address the following items: 1. Nature, circumstances, extent, and gravity of the violations; 2. Your ability to pay the proposed assessments; 3. Any prior history of violations; 4. Your degree of culpability; Mr. McIntyre May 1, 1996 Complaint No. 96-53 Page -2- 5. Economic benefit or saving, if any, resulting from the violations, and 6. Such other matters as justice may require. If you have any questions, please contact Mark Adelson, at 909-782-3234, Stephen D. Mayville at 909-782-4992, or the Regional Board's staff counsel, Ted Cobb, at 916-657- 0406. Sincerely, Gera J. Thibeault Executive Officer Enclosure: Complaint No. 96-53 and "Waiver of Hearing" form cc: w/enclosures Regional Board State Water Resources Control Board, Office of the Chief Counsel - Ted Cobb State Water Resources Control Board, Division of Water Quality - Bruce Fujimoto State Water Resources Control Board, Office of State-Wide Consistency- Denise Launey San Bernardino County Flood Control/Transportation Department - Naresh Varma U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, Permits Issuance Section - Eugene Bromley (W-5-1) CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD SANTA ANA REGION IN THE MATTER OF; ) COMPLAINT NO. 96-53 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ) FOR OF ORANGE COUNTY ) ADMINISTRATIVE CIVIL LIABILITY 108" ELLIS AVENUE ) FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA ) 92708-7018 - ) YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE THAT: 1. The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC) is alleged to have violated provisions of law for which the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region (hereinafter Board), may impose liability pursuant to Section 13385 of the California Water Code (Water Code). 2. A hearing concerning this complaint will be held before the Board within 60 days of the date of issuance of this complaint, unless CSDOC waives its right to a hearing (waiver procedures are specified on page 4 of the complaint). If the hearing in this matter is not waived, it will be held during the Board's regular meeting on May 31, 1996 at the California Tower, Highgrove Room (Room No. 200). 3737 Main Street, Riverside, CA. The meeting begins at 9:00 a.m. CSDOC or its representative will have an opportunity to appear and be heard and to contest the allegations in this complaint and the imposition of civil liability by the Board. An agenda for the meeting will be mailed to you not less than 10 days before the hearing date. 3. If the May 31, 1996 hearing is held, the Board will consider whether to affirm, reject, or modify the proposed administrative civil liability or whether to refer the matter to the Attorney General for recovery of judicial civil liability. 4. You are alleged to have violated California Water Code Section 13376 by discharging pollutants to navigable waters of the United States that are within the state's jurisdiction without having filed a report of the discharge and without having obtained waste discharge requirements adopted by the Board. Further, CSDOC is alleged to have violated Order No. 84-1, NPDES No. CA0110604, Waste Discharge Requirements, specifically, General Provisions of the Order which so \Snv stgt\csdcc\comJant.acl-2 Complaint No. 96-53 -2- May 1, 1996 prohibit discharges from "causing injury to the property of others,' and by failing to provide adequate operations staff training. 5. This complaint is based on the fallowing facts: A) The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC) owns and operates hundreds of miles of interceptor sewers and 26 sewage lift stations (SLS) that contribute an average of 243 MGD (million gallons per day) to CSDOC's two regional sewage treatment plants. B) On February 21, 1996, a pump control mechanism malfunctioned at the Bay Bridge SLS (located in the vicinity of the intersection of Pacific Coast Highway and Bayside Drive in Newport Beach) which caused its pumps to shut down between 10:12 p.m. on February 21, 1996 and approximately 6:30 a.m. on February 22, 1996 (approximately an 8 hour period). C) According to CSDOC's estimates, the Bay Bridge SLS shut down resulted in the discharge of approximately 41,000 gallons of raw sewage from the interceptor sewer system into Newport Bay, a navigable water of the United States, and into 18 private residences, in violation of Order No. 84-1. Board staff is in agreement with this estimate. D) It is likely that most of the raw sewage entering the residences eventually entered Newport Bay. It was reported that residence owners were forced to dispose of the sewage entering their homes by bailing it out either to their yards, where it could runoff to Newport Bay, or directly to the Bay. E) CSDOC could not cleanup the raw sewage discharged to Newport Bay. The effects of the raw sewage discharged to the residences were mitigated by professional cleaning companies retained by the residence owners. CSDOC is working with the owners of the 18 residences to settle claims for their cleanup and restoration expenses. F) The raw sewage discharged to Newport Bay resulted in a condition of pollution in the Bay. Approximately two miles of Newport Bay between Linda Isle, Harbor Island, and Balboa Island and the mainland was closed to the public for three days to restrict water contact recreation. G) The Bay Bridge SLS is equipped with sophisticated monitoring equipment which enables CSDOC staff to continuously monitorthe station's operational status. sdn%inv stgtl csdoc\complant.ecl-3 Complaint No. 96-53 -3- May 1, 1996 H) Responsible CSDOC staff at the Plant No. 1 control center failed to respond to the monitoring system's warning of the Bay Bridge SLS shut down. This failure to respond was due to inadequate training of the CSDOC staff. It is reasonable to expect that had adequate training been provided, CSDOC staff would have recognized the severity of the station's operational status and the need for a response based on consideration of the following: 1) The Bay Bridge SLS was designated by CSDOC as a critical pump station; and 2) The zero discharge flow condition registered by the monitoring system for the Bay Bridge SLS during the entire 8-hour period was highly atypical. Historic flow characteristics for the Bay Bridge SLS show that the discharge rarely falls below 1.8 MGD between mid-night and 6:00 a.m. during a week day. 6. Pursuant to Water Code Section 13385. those who violate Water Code Section 13376 are liable civilly. As provided by Water Code Section 13385, the Board can edministratively assess a civil liability of an amount not to exceed the sum of both of the following: A) Ten thousand dollars ($10,000) for each day in which the violation occurs; and, B) Where there is a discharge, any portion of which is not susceptible to cleanup or is not cleaned up, and the volume discharged but not cleaned up exceeds 1,OOD gallons, an additional liability not to exceed ten dollars ($10) times the number of gallons by which the volume discharged but not cleaned up exceeds 1,000 gallons. 7. The maximum liability for the violations cited above is $410,000 which is comprised of: A) $10,000 for one day of violation; and B) $400,000 for the estimated 40,000 gallons (41,000 gallons minus 1,000 gallons) of spilled sewage, which was not susceptible to cleanup. 8. Section 13385(e)specifies factors that the Board shall consider in establishing the amount of civil liability. After consideration of those factors, the Executive Officer proposes civil liability be imposed on County Sanitation Districts of Orange County by the Board in the amount of $50,000 for the violations cited above. sdmllnv s[g[\csdoc\corn lan[.acl-4 Complaint No. 96-53 -4- May 1, 1996 WAIVER OF HEARING You may waive your right to a hearing. If you waive your right to a hearing, please sign the attached waiver and return it together with a cashier's check made payable to the State Water Resources Control Board in the amount of the civil liability proposed in paragraph 8 above. Send the check and waiver to: Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board 3737 Main Street, Suite 500 Riverside, CA 92501-3339 If you have any questions regarding this complaint, please contact Gerard J. Thibeault at (909) 782-3284, Stephen D. Mayville at (909) 782-4992, Mark Adelson at (909) 782- 3234, or contact the Regional Board's staff counsel, Ted Cobb, at (916) 657-0406. s/A XN Date Gerkd J. Thibeault Executive Officer admllnv scgc lcsdx%Complm[.acl-5 CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD SANTA ANA REGION IN THE MATTER OF: ) COMPLAINT NO. 96-53 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ) FOR OF ORANGE COUNTY ) ADMINISTRATIVE CIVIL LIABILITY 108" ELLIS AVENUE ) FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA ) 92708-7018 ) WAIVER OF HEARING The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC) agrees to waive its right to a hearing before the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board with regard to violations alleged in Complaint No. 96-53. CSDOC has enclosed a cashiers check made payable to the State Water Resources Control Board in the amount of $50,000 in settlement of Complaint No. 96-53. CSDOC understands that it is giving up its right to be heard and to argue against allegations made by the Executive Officer in this complaint, and against the imposition of, and the amount of, the civil liability. Date for the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Pertinent Facts and Key Statistics - FY 95-96 July 1 , 1995 through March 31 , 1996 General Information Year of Formation: 1948 Year Began Operation: 1954 Form of Government: County Sanitation Districts Authority: Section 4700 et seq, California Health and Safety Code Operating Authority: NPDES 301(h) Permit No. CA0110604 Governing Agencies: EPA, Region IX & California Regional Water Quality Control Board Number of Districts: 9 Number of Board Members: 29 Service Area: 471 sq. miles Number of Cities Served: 23 Approximate Service Area Population: 2.2 million Wastewater Treatment Plants: Reclamation Plant No. 1 & Treatment Plant No. 2 Total Miles of Trunk Sewers: 650 Number of Operating Off-Site Pumping Stations: 22 Number of Authorized Employees: 673 Number of Waste Discharge Permits: 994 Total Number of Odor Complaints - Both Plants, FY 1994-95: 2 Operations/Treatment Information 9-month Average Daily Flow(Influent) Plant No. 1: 77.8 MGD Plant No. 2: 158.6 MGD 9-month Average Daily Flow Total Combined Influent: 236.4 MGD Primary Treatment Capacity (Including Standby) Plant No. 1: 108 MGD Plant No. 2: 186 MGD Total: 294 MGD Secondary Treatment Capacity Plant No. 1: 66 MGD Plant No. 2: 90 MGD Total: 156 MGD Ocean Outfall Booster Station (GOBS) Pumping Capacity: 480 MGD Additional OOBS Standby Pumping Capacity: 120 MGD Daily Average Biosolids Production Plant No. 1 @ 19.2 Solids: 87 WTPD In Wet Tons Per Day (WTPD) 7 Days a Week Plant No. 2 @ 21.7 Solids: 363 WTPD Total: 550 WTPD Daily Average Biosolids Recycled (All Direct-Land Application): 550 WTPD Monthly Average Biosolids Truck Loads- Both Plants: 597 Average Wet Tons of Biosolids Per Truck Load 25.8 Wet Tons Monthly Average Biosolids Management Costs $391,000 Monthly Average Grit and Screenings Disposal Total - Both Plants: 157 Wet Tons May 1996 1 Fiscal Year 1995-96 Pertinent Facts and Key Statistics (continued) Influent and Effluent Flow Constituents—Combined Monthly Averaces: 7-1-95 to 3-31-96 Fmuent Constituent Influent Effluent Permit Limit Total Biochemical Oxygen Demand (TBOD) 230.0 mg/L 80.0 mg/L 100.0 mg/L Grease and Oil 50.0 mg/L 14.3 mg/L 25.0 mg/L Total Suspended Solids (TSS) 223.0 mg/L 46.0 mg/L 60.0 mg/L Settleable Solids (SE) N/A 0.6 mUL 1.0 mUL Ammonia 22.0 mg/L 23.0 mg/L 30.0 mg/L PH 7.6 7.6 6-9 Financial I n fO1M a tl OQ Fees and Charges: One-Time Single-Family Residence Connection: $2,350 Average Annual Single-Family Residence Sewer Service Fee: $71 Average Property Tax Share (2.8% of 1% of Assessed Value @$100,000): $28 Average Single-Family Residence Total Sewer Bill: $99 Average Operations and Maintenance Cost to Treat One Million Gallons of Wastewater: FY 1994-95: $538 FY 1995-96 Budget(Revised): $599 FY 1995-96 (as of March 31, 1996): $553 CENTRAL POWER GENERATION RECAP (First Nine Months of FY 95-96): Cost of Electricity if Purchased @ $.080 per kWh — Both Plants: $5,831.652 (Not Including Plant No. 1 Administration Bldg., Control Center and Laboratory) Standby Interconnection and Maintenance Charges (So. Cal. Edison): ($272,784) Export Power Sales to Southern California Edison: $321,120 Natural Gas Costs (Both Plants): ($657,640) L M Costs to Operate Central Power Generation Plants: ($1,659,044) QMD Permit Fees and Emission Fee Reduction: $30,000 ding Heating and Cooling Savings: 00Savings by Generating Our Own Power (July 1 ,1995 to March 31, 1996): $3,893,307 Electricity Costs (Plant No. 1 Admin Bldg., Laboratory and Control Center): $276,518 Potable and Recycled Water Costs — Both Plants: $485,037 Joint Treatment Works Operating Budget for Fiscal Year 1995-96: $54,380,000 Capital Improvement Budget for Fiscal Year 1995-96: - $33,530,000 Fixed.Assets as of 03/31/96 (At Cost): $1,069,403,000 Original Outstanding Certificates Of Participation (COP) Issues: December 1990 New Money: $100,000,000 May 1991 New Money: $117,555,000 September 1992 New Money: $ 98,500,000 December 1992 Refunding: $160,600,000 September 1993 Refunding: $ 46.000,000 Outstanding COP Balance as of 03/31196: $384,618,000 Outstanding General Obligation Bonds Balance as of 03131196: $45,000 May 1996 2 ti COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY RESULTS OF COMMUNICATIONS AUDIT Question 1: How long have you been with the Districts? Under 1 year 6% 1-5 years 31% 6 - 10 years 41% 11 - 15 years 12% 16 -20 years 6% Over 20 years 5% Question 2: Which of the following describes your job classification? Administrative/Clerical 21% Professional 18% Technical 18% Supervisor/Manager 16% Maintenance 16% Operators 6% Department Head 2% Question 3: We've gone through some tough years at the Districts but I think things are improving. Strongly agree 6% Agree 33% Somewhat agree 38% Disagree 19% Strongly disagree 4% Question 4: Morale at the Districts is improving. Strongly agree 1% Agree 17% Somewhat agree 40% Disagree 35% Strongly Disagree 7% r Question 5: Communications at the Districts is im rovin . Strongly agree 7% Agree 28% Somewhat A ree 42% Disagree 21% Strongly disagree 2% Question 6: The Districts cares about me and what I think. Strongly agree 4% Agree 23% Somewhat agree 39% Disagree 28% Strongly disagree 6% Question 7: If I have a question about a policy or procedure, I know where to get an answer. Strongly agree 6% Agree 44% Somewhat agree 34% Disagree 14% Strongly Disagree 2% Question 8: The Districts' mission, goals and objectives have been clearly communicated to me. Strongly agree 9% Agree 42% Somewhat agree 34% Disagree 13% Strongly disagree 2% Question 9: The Districts is a good place to work. Strongly agree 24% Agree 49% Somewhat agree 23% Disagree 4% Strongly Disagree 3% Question 10: 1 usually receive information about what's going on at the Districts from: (1 = Highest Ranking) My su ervisorimana er 1 My fellow employees 2 De artmentldivision meetings 3 Memos 4 The News Pipeline 5 The grapevine 6 Rumors 17 The NEWSLine 18 Newspapers 19 Question 11: I would rather receive information about the Districts from: (1 = Highest Ranking) My su ervisortmana er 1 Department/division meetings 2 Memos 3 The News Pipeline 4 The NEWSLine 5 My fellow employees 6 The grapevine 7 Newspapers 8 Rumors 9 Question 12: Please rank the following list of communication sources for importance and accuracy: (1 = Highest Ranking) Importance Accuracy My su ervisor/mana er 1 1 Department/division meetings 2 2 Memos 3 3 The News Pipeline 4 4 The NEWSLine 5 5 My fellow employees 6 6 Newspapers 7 8 The grapevine 8 7 Rumors 9 9 Question 13: The amount of information I receive on the Districts' future plans is: Too Much 4% Too Little 54% Just Right 38% No Answer 4% Question 14: The amount of information I receive on the Districts' policies and procedures is: Too Much 6% Too Little 54% Just Right 35% No Answer 5% Question 15: The amount of information I receive on proposed expansion change in the Districts' operation is: Too Much 4% Too Little 64% Just Right 26% No Answer 6% Question 16: The amount of information I receive on management philosophy is: Too Much 11% Too Little 50% Just Right 26% No Answer 13% Question 17: The amount of information I receive on job related information is: Too Much 1% Too Little 50% Just Right 43% No Answer 6% Question 18: The amount of information 1 receive on job advancement opportunities is: Too Much 0% Too Little 53% Just Ri ht 37% No Answer 10% Question 19: The amount of information /receive on the effect of external issues on my job is: Too Much 2% Too Little 62% Just Right 21% No Answer 15% Question 20: The amount of information I receive on news of other departments/divisions is: Too Much 2% Too Little 64% Just Right 25% No Answer 9% Question 21: The amount of information I receive on the Districts' stand on current issues is: Too Much 0% Too Little 64% Just Right 26% No Answer 10% Question 22: The amount of information I receive on the Districts' community involvement is: Too Much 1% Too Little 51% Just Right 37% No Answer 11% Question 23: The amount of information I receive on personnel changes/promotions is: Too Much 2% Too Little 35% Just Right 59% No Answer 4% Question 24: The amount of information I receive on human interest news on co-workers is: Too Much 3% Too Little 33% Just Ri ht 55% No Answer 9% Question 25: The amount of information I receive ongeneral Districts' news is: Too Much 2% Too Little 41% Just Right 53% No Answer 4% Question 26: How would you rate the overall content of The News Pipeline? Excellent 18% Good 61% Fair 19% Poor 2% Question 27: When you receive The News Pi eline, how much do you read? Almost all of it 79% About half of it 9% Only selected articles 9% Little, if any, of it 3% Question 28: Does The News Pipeline keep you up-to-date with the Districts' news? Always 9% Most of the time 57% Sometimes 31% Rarely 3% Question 29: Do you think The News Pipeline maintains a good balance of information? Always 9% Most of the time 61% Sometimes 26% Rarely 4% Question 30: Would you like to see The News Pipeline expanded? Yes 70% No 30% Question 31: How often would you like to see The News Pipeline distributed? Bi-weeklyas it is now) 82% Monthly 16% Quarter) 2% Question 32: Would you like to see an employee newsletter that has more department features and stories about fellow employees? Yes 62% No 38% Question 33: How frequently do you call the NEWSLine? Once a week 11% Every other week 6% Once a month 41% Never 42% Question 34: Did you attend last summer's Family Day? Yes 29% No 71% Question 35: Did you attend last summer's CSDOC Picnic? Yes 16% No 84% Question 36: Did you attend the CSDOC Holiday Party? Yes 18% No 82% Question 37: Would you like to see more events like Family Day? Yes 63% No 37% COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1 , 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 , 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES JOINT BOARD MEETING APRIL 24, 1996 RICTS OFo99�✓ hQe � co c a y 2 � J a ��FCl�NC�THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County,California,Was held on April 24, 1996,at 7:30 p.m., in the Districts'Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll Was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1,2, 3,5,6,7, 11, 13,and 14 as follows: ACTIVE ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO.1: x Pat McGuigan,Chair Ted R. Moreno g James M.Ferryman,Chair pro tem _ Arthur Perry • Mark Murphy Joanne Coontz g Thomas R.Sekarelli Jim Potts _• Roger Stanton William G. Steiner DISTRICT NO.2: g John Collins,Chair George Scott x Daniel T.Welch,Chair pro tam John M.Gullorson g Berry Dense Bob Bell g Bumie Dunlap Glenn Parker g Norman Z.Eckenrode Carol Downey x James H.Flom Steve Anderson x Pat McGuigan _ Ted R.Moreno x Mark Murphy Joanne Coontz x Chris Norby Don Bankhead x Sheldon Singer George L.Zlaket x Roger Stanton William G. Steiner x Bob Zemel Tom Day DISTRICT NO.3: x Sal A Sapien,Chair Harry M. Dotson g Bumie Dunlap,Chair pro tam Glenn Parker g Walter Bowmen Gail Kerry x George Brown Marilyn Bruce Hastings x John Collins George Scott x James H.Flora Steve Anderson g Don R. Griffin _ Patsy Marshall x Victor Leipzig _ Ralph Bauer _ x Wally Linn _ Eva G. Miner x Pat McGuigan _ Ted R.Moreno _x Chris Norby _ Don Bankhead x Margie L.Rice _ James V.Evans x Sheldon Singer _ George L Zlaket �x Roger Stanton _ William G.Steiner x Charles Sylvia _ Robert Wohlstrom x Bob Zemel _ Tom Day DISTRICT NO.6: _ Jan Debay,Chair x John C. Cox,Jr. William G.Steiner g Roger Stanton,Chair pro tam x John C.Cox,Jr. _ Jan Debay DISTRICT NO.e: g James M.Ferrymen,Chair _ Arthur Perry Jan Debay x John C.Cox,Jr. William G.Steiner x Roger Stanton,Chair pro tam DISTRICT NO.7: x Barry Hammond,Chair Mike Ward x Thomas R.Saltarelll,Chair pro tam _ Jim Potts Jan Debay x John C.Cox,Jr. g James M. Ferryman _ Arthur Perry g Pat McGuigan _ Ted R. Moreno g Mark A Murphy _ Joanne Coontz William G.Steiner x Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO.11: x Victor Leipzig,Chair _ Ralph Bauer —xL Shirley Deti Chair pro tam _ Ralph Bauer _X_ Roger Stanton _ William G. Steiner DISTRICT NO.13: x John M.Gullhaon,Chair _ Daniel T.Welch g Bob Zemel,Chair pro tam _ Tom Day g Bumie Dunlap Glenn Parker _x Mark Murphy _ Joanne Coontz William G.Steiner x Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO.14: g Thomas R.Sallarelli,Chair _ Jim Potts x Mark A Murphy,Chair pro tam _ Joanne Coontz g Barry Hammond Mike Ward William G.Steiner __X__ Roger Stanton Pear A.Swan Darryl Miller _2_ County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 4/24/96 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Blake P. Anderson, Assistant General Manager- Operations, Judith A. Wilson, Assistant General Manager-Administration, Penny Kyle, Board Secretary, Janet Gray, Irwin Haycock, Ed Hodges, Patricia Jonk, David Ludwin, Mike Moore, Bob Dolan, Mike Peterman, Gary Streed, Michelle Tuchman, Nancy Wheatley, Paula Zeller OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Bill Knopf, Mary Lee DISTRICT 5 Appointment of Chair pro tem In the absence of Chair Jan Debay and Chair pro tern William Steiner, Director Roger Stanton was appointed Chair pro tem of District No. 5. DISTRICT 6 Appointment of Chair pro tern In the absence of Chair James Ferryman and Chair pro tem Jan Debay, Director Roger Stanton was appointed Chair pro tern of District No. 6. ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Joint Chair The Joint Chair informed Board Members that Director Margie Rice's son had passed away following a recent heart transplant, and extended sympathy to Margie and her family. The Joint Chair reported that due to a fall that severely injured her kneecap, Director Jan Debay had undergone surgery. He advised that she was now recuperating at home. As Don McIntyre was in Cleveland, Ohio, attending a ULI Spring Meeting, Joint Chair Cox advised that Blake Anderson would be covering for Don until his return this Monday. The following tentatively scheduled upcoming meetings were then announced as follows: -3- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 4124/96 Operations, Maintenance, and Technical Services Committee - Wednesday, May 1, at 5:30 p.m. Planning, Design, and Construction Committee -Thursday, May 2, at 5:30 p.m. Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee - Wednesday, May 8, at 5:30 p.m. Executive Committee -Wednesday, May 15, at 5:30 p.m. Steering Committee - Wednesday, May 22, at 5:30 p.m. ALL DISTRICTS Report of General Manaaer Blake Anderson advised that at the Strategic Planning Workshop scheduled for May 4 at the Districts' Administrative Offices, Bill Mills, General Manager for the Orange County Water District, would be the keynote speaker on the topic of Regional Water Reclamation Project. An open panel discussion would then commence on the Districts' strategic planning efforts. ALL DISTRICTS Report of General Counsel Tom Woodruff spoke on the status of Assembly Bill 2109. He referenced the position of the Districts as detailed in his memorandum dated April 18, 1996 to the Joint Chair and Board Members. Mr. Woodruff advised that a Closed Session would not be necessary, and informed the Boards that trial was set for June 3, 1996 re Andy C. Patterson, at al., v. County Sanitation Districts. The Louis Sangermano case has been continued by the Court until September 1996. Of all the Bayside Drive Pump Station spill claims, he stated that only one claim, that of Donna Anderson, would require more efforts to settle. DISTRICT 1 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held March 27, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this matter be made a matter of record. -4- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 4/24/96 DISTRICT 2 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held March 27, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this matter be made a matter of record. DISTRICT 3 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held March 27, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this matter be made a matter of record. DISTRICT 5 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held March 27, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this matter be made a matter of record. DISTRICT 6 Aporoval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held March 27, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this matter be made a matter of record. DISTRICT 7 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held March 27, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this matter be made a matter of record. -5- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 4/24196 DISTRICT 11 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held March 27, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this matter be made a matter of record. DISTRICT 13 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held March 27, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this matter be made a matter of record. DISTRICT 14 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held March 27, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this matter be made a matter of record. ALL DISTRICTS Ratification of payment of Joint and Individual District Claims Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That payment of Joint and Individual District claims set forth on exhibits "A" , "B", and "C", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. -6- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 4/24/96 ALL DISTRICTS 03/20/96 04/03/96 MISC. Joint Operating Fund - $ 761,338.90 $583,982.67 $2,671.47 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 1,143,601.05 355,959.46 1,396.66 Joint Working Capital Fund - 162.481.48 507,201.07 590.66 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 58,550.50 51,041.23 22,381.81 DISTRICT NO, 1 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 DISTRICT NO, 2 - 230.46 3,385.59 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 3 24,212.17 613,519.59 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 0.00 115,683.00 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 7,997.97 7,795.19 90.00 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 8,915.86 17,499.94 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 13 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 DISTRICT NO, 14 - 0.00 1,714.76 0.00 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 8 6 JOINT - 0.00 209,852.48 0.00 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 0.00 6,822.36 0.00 DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 0.00 5.856.10 0.00 $2.167.328.39 $2.480.313.44 27130.60 ALL DISTRICTS Ratifying staff action in issuino a Purchase order re Specification No, C-035 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the action of staff in issuing a purchase order to Neutron Products, Inc., second low bid for Purchase of Anionic Polyelectrolyte Chemical Polymer, Specification No. C-035, from January 25, 1996 through April 24, 1996, for purchase of polymer at the approximate total price of$35,000.00, including sales tax, and requiring Polypure, Inc. (lowest bid and recipient of contract for Specification No. C-035), to reimburse to the Districts the cost difference of approximately $9,000.00, including sales tax, due to Polypure, Inc.'s failure to supply polymer as required by Specification No. C-035 approved by the Boards of Directors on July 26, 1995, be, and is hereby, ratified. -7- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 4/24/96 ALL DISTRICTS Awardina Purchase of Sodium Hypochlorite Solution, Soecification No. C-040. to Western States Chemical, Inc. Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 9642, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Purchase of Sodium Hypochlorite Solution, Specification No. C-040, to Western States Chemical, Inc., for the delivered price of$.455 per gallon, plus sales tax, for a one-year period beginning May 14, 1996, with option for four one-year extensions upon mutually-agreeable terms. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Awardina Purchase and Installation of Information Technoloov Trailer Complex, Specification No. E-265A. to Brandall Modular Corporation Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 9643, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Purchase and Installation of Information Technology Trailer Complex, Specification No. E-265A, to Brandall Modular Corporation for an amount not to exceed $275,700.00, including sales tax; and authorizing an additional amount not to exceed $5,136.00 for the cost of Labor & Material and Faithful Performance Bonds, as deemed necessary by General Counsel. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file draft minutes of the Steering Committee Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the draft minutes of the Steering Committee meeting held on March 27, 1996, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. -8- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 4/24/96 ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file draft minutes of the Operations. Maintenance. and Technical Services Committee Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the draft minutes of the Operations, Maintenance, and Technical Services Committee meeting held on April 3, 1996, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file draft minutes of the Planning. Design. and Construction Committee Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the draft minutes of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee meeting held on April 4, 1996, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file draft minutes of the Finance. Administration. and Human Resources Committee Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the draft minutes of the Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee meeting held on April 10, 1996, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Verbal report from Chair of Operations Maintenance. and Technical Services Committee re April 3. 1996 meeting Verbal report Director Pat McGuigan, Chair of the Operations, Maintenance, and Technical Services Committee, gave a brief verbal report on the items being recommended for approval. -9- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 4/24/96 ALL DISTRICTS (OMT896-008) Authorizing a 1996 Summer Work Proaram Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That a 1996 Summer Work Program for painting, tunnel maintenance, grounds maintenance, and pump station maintenance work at an estimated amount of $140,000.00, be, and is hereby, authorized. ALL DISTRICTS Verbal report from Chair of Plannina. Design. and Construction Committee re Aoril 4. 1996 meeting Verbal reoort Director John Collins, Chair of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee, gave a brief verbal report on the items being recommended for approval. ALL DISTRICTS (PDC96-15) Approving plans and specifications re Job Nos. P1-40-2 and P2-47-2 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 96-44, approving plans and specifications for Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-40-2, and Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-47-2, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -10- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 4/24/96 ALL DISTRICTS (PDC96-16) Actions re Comoressed Natural Gas Refueling Station, Job No. P1-51 Approving plans and specifications re Job No. P1-51 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 9645, approving plans and specifications for Compressed Natural Gas Refueling Station, Job No. P1-51, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. Authorizing the General Manager to award construction contract to lowest resoonsible bidder Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to award a construction contract to the lowest responsible bidder for Compressed Natural Gas Refueling Station, Job No. P1-51, for an amount not to exceed $436,074.00. ALL DISTRICTS Verbal report from Chair of Finance. Administration. and Human Resources Committee re April 10, 1996 meeting Verbal report Director George Brown, Chair of the Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee, gave a brief verbal report on the items being recommended for approval. _11_ County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 4124/96 ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR96-231 Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of February 1996 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Treasurer's Report for the month of February 1996, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR96-24) Authorized staff to make supplier name changes to Board-approved purchases Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That a policy allowing staff to make supplier name changes to Board-approved purchases, be, and is hereby, authorized. ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR96-25) Actions re 1996-97 Sewer Use Fees. Connection Fees. and Annexation Fees Increasing the 1996-97 Sewer Connection Fees and 1996-97 Annexation Fees Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the 1996-97 Sewer Connection Fees and 1996-97 Annexation Fees, in accordance with the Engineering News Record - Los Angeles Construction Cost Index, be, and are hereby, increased. Director John M. Gullixson requested that his opposition to the motion be made a matter of record. Declaring that 1996-97 Sewer Use Fees remain unchanged from the 1995-96 rates Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby declare that the 1996-97 Sewer Use Fees remain unchanged from the 1995-96 rates. -12- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 4/24/96 ALL DISTRICTS Status report re County's Commingled Investment Pool Blake Anderson advised Board Members that the action re Ballot for Accepting or Rejecting the County of Orange Plan of Adjustment regarding the Chapter 9 Bankruptcy was ministerial in nature, in that it simply confirms what the Boards have previously acted upon and approved, namely, the Joint Settlement Agreement. He also reported concerning the distribution which has been made to the Districts of the pre-bankruptcy funds previously held by the County. With the Option B participants having completed their negotiations, staff recommended that the General Manager be authorized to sign the Ballot. ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing the General Manager to execute the Ballot for Accepting or Rejectino Debtor's (County of Orange) Plan of Adiustment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to execute the Ballot for Accepting or Rejecting Debtor's (County of Orange) Plan of Adjustment regarding the Chapter 9 Bankruptcy pending before the United States Bankruptcy Court, Central District of California. Director Don R. Griffin requested that his abstention to the motion be made a matter of record. ALL DISTRICTS (PDC96-04) Actions re Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers 3. 4. and 5 at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-41: Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-43: Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 1. Job No. P144: Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers D through O at Plant No. 2, Job No. P248: Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-50: Seismic Retrofit at Plant No 2 Job No P2-53-2 Tunnel Cover Replacement at Billings Tunnel at Plant No. 2. SP19950021 and Sludge Piping Modification Primary Sedimentation Basins 6-15 SP199500597 Verbal report of Director of Engineering David Ludwin provided the Directors with a brief report on the project. -13- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 4/24/96 Following a brief discussion, Director Sal Sapien requested that in-depth staff reports be provided to more fully inform Directors on major projects. Director John Collins stated that the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee had thoroughly reviewed, discussed, and approved the project. Judy Wilson, Assistant General Manager-Administration, noted that the project was ready to be bid. In the future, she advised that staff would be prepared to give detailed information to Directors at the Joint Boards meeting when major projects are initially placed on an agenda. Approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for said projects, changing the date for receipt of bids from March 12, 1996 to March 26, 1996, be, and is hereby, approved. Approving Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications for said projects, making miscellaneous technical clarifications, be, and is hereby, approved. Deleting Conveyor Belt Access at Solids Storage Plant No. 2. SP1995003. from the Plans and specifications Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Conveyor Belt Access at Solids Storage Plant No. 2, SP1995003, be, and is hereby, deleted from the plans and specifications. -14- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 4/24/96 Awarding contract to Margate Construction Inc Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 96-46, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation, awarding contract for Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers 3, 4, and 5 at Plant No. 1, Job No. 121-41, Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Plant No. 1, Job No. P143; Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-44; Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers D Through Q at Plant No. 2, Job No. P248; Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-50; Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53-2; Tunnel Cover Replacement at Billings Tunnel at Plant No. 2, SP19950021; and Sludge Piping Modification at Primary Sedimentation Basins 6-15, SP19950059, to Margate Construction, Inc. in the total amount of$8,461,138.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. Director Sal Sapien requested that his opposition to the motion be made a matter of record. DISTRICTS 2.3.5.7 & 11 Receive and file draft minutes of the Selection Committee Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the draft minutes of the Selection Committee held on February 29, 1996, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICTS 2.3.5.7 & 11 Approving Professional Services Agreement with Mangan. Inc. for preparation of an Electrical Area Classifications Study Report for Miscellaneous Improvements and Rehabilitation of Outlying Pump Stations, Contract No. 2-37 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee with Mangan, Inc. for preparation of an Electrical Area Classifications Study Report for Miscellaneous Improvements and Rehabilitation of Outlying Pump Stations, Contract No. 2-37, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed, and approved; and, -15- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 4124/96 FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 96-47, approving said agreement with Mangan, Inc. for said services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, direct expenses, subconsultant fees, and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $52,120.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 1 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:15 p.m. DISTRICT 2 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:15 p.m. DISTRICT 3 AdJ'oumment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:15 p.m. DISTRICT 5 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:15 p.m. -16- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 4/24/96 DISTRICT 6 Adiournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:15 p.m. DISTRICT 7 Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Contract Nos. 7-22 and 7-24 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Parallel and Replacement of Portions of Lemon Heights Subtrunk Sewer, La Colina Drive to Newport Boulevard, Contract No. 7-22, and Manhole Access Modifications to RA-14 Sewer at Newport Boulevard and Cowan Heights Drive, Contract No. 7-24, authorizing an addition of$213,547.19 to the contract with Calfon Construction, Inc., for five items of additional work, and granting a time extension of eight calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICT 7 Ordering Annexation No. 142 - Kendler Annexation Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 96-48-7, ordering annexation of 1.28 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity southeast of the intersection of Orange Park Boulevard and Clark Street in unincorporated County territory (Annexation No. 142 - Kendler Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7). Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -17- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 4/24/96 DISTRICT 7 Orderino Annexation No. 147 - Beshoff Annexation Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 96-49-7, ordering annexation of .886 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity south of the intersection of Lower Lake Drive and Lake Court in unincorporated County territory (Annexation No. 147 - Beshoff Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7). Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Receive and file request for annexation authorizing initiation proceedings re proposed Annexation No 151 - Goodman Annexation Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the request from Lawrence and Sharlene Goodman for annexation of 1.01 acres of territory to the District, in the vicinity southeast of the intersection of Santiago Canyon Road and Kennymead Street in unincorporated County territory, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 96-50-7, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to the District (proposed Annexation No. 151 - Goodman Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7). Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Journment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:15 p.m. -18- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 4124196 DISTRICT 11 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:15 p.m. DISTRICT 13 Journment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:15 p.m. DISTRICT 14 Adiournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:15 p.m. Secretary of tU Bo s of Directors of County Sanitati istricts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14 _19_ FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 03/19/96 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0320/96 POSTING DATE 0320MS WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 150635 ABM BUSINESS MACHINES, INC. $30.17 OFFICE EQUIPMENT REPAIR 150636 ARMA INTERNATIONAL $450.00 MEMBERSHIP 150637 AT&T-CELLULAR CR BR $22.95 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 150638 A T&T-MEGACOM SERVICE $9.21 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 150639 ACORN CONSULTING $715.00 CONSULTING SERVICES 15DS40 AIR LIQUIDE AMERICA CORP. $1,604.72 SPECIALTY GASSES 150641 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $18,705.89 O&M AGREEMENT OXYGEN.SYST.M.O.8-9419 150642 ALADDIN HOUSE $229.73 WINDOW BLINDS 150543 AMERIDATA $748.05 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 150644 AMERICAN AIRLINES $387.10 TRAVEL SERVICES 150645 AMERICAN MANAGEMENT ASSOC. $1,500.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING 150616 BLAKE P.ANDERSON $748.93 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 150647 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $1.094.40 NOTICES&ADS 150648 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $319.99 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 150649 AQUATIC BIOASSAY&CONSULTANT $2,305.00 LAB TESTING 150650 ARAMARK SERVICES,INC. $72.73 SAFETY SUPPLIES 150651 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT $1.476.49 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 150652 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. $60.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL m 150653 ATKINIJONES COMPUTER SERVICE $321.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT X 150664 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $3.667.23 PAYROLL SERVICES x � 150655 BKK LANDFILL $2,708.99 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10.9-91 150656 E S BABCOCK&SONS INC $277.50 LAB ANALYSIS -1 150657 BANCROFT-WHITNEY CO.. $104.52 PUBLICATION y 150655 BANK OF AMERICA $309.52 ACCOUNT ANALYSIS 150659 BARNSTEAD I THERMOLYNE CORP. $952.20 LAB SUPPLIES 150660 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $174.56 BATTERIES 150661 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $4,921.90 LAB SUPPLIES 150662 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $259.90 TRUCK WASH TICKETS 150663 BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS 5743.19 LAB EQUIPMENT 150664 BIO-GRO DIVISION $49.989.21 RESIDUALS REMOVAL NO 4-26.95 150665 BONA-RUES $685.86 TRUCK PARTS 150666 BUDGET JANITORIAL $3,330.00 JANITORIAL SERVICES MO 1-12-94 150667 BNI BOOKS $34.27 PUBLICATION 150668 BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFFAIRS $781.89 PUBLICATIONS 150669 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. $608.58 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 160670 CH2M HILL $78,003.38 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-31 150671 C.P.J. $1.616.25 LAB SUPPLIES 150672 CS COMPANY $4,144.60 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 150673 CWEA 1995 SRTC $1,056.00 REGISTRATION FEES 150674 CALTROL,INC. $1.609.35 HARDWARE 150675 CALIFORNIA AUTO COLLISION,INC. $1,251.71 TRUCK BODY REPAIR 160676 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $200.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 150677 CALIFORNIA JOURNAL,INC. $29.95 SUBSCRIPTION 150678 CANUS CORPORATION $17.200.13 FIBER OPTIC CABLE 150679 CAREER TRACK SEMINARS $158.00 REGISTRATION FEES 150680 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $49,637.36 ENGINEERING SERVICE J-33-2 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 031191% PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0320/96 POSTING DATE 0320/e6 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 150681 BRYAN CAVE LLP $97.75 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 150682 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $2,019.91 OFFICE FURNITURE 150683 CENTURY SAFETY INST.B SUPPLY $175.00 SAFETY SUPPLIES 150884 CHEMWEST,INC. $1,223.23 PUMP PARTS 150685 - KELLY CHRISTENSEN $215.46 INCIDENT COMMAND POST TARP 150686 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $4,545.60 SERVICE AGREEMENT 150687 COAST RUBBER STAMP $72.34 OFFICE SUPPLIES 150688 COMMUNICATIONS PERFORMANCE GROUP $17.850.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE M010.25.95 160689 CONFIDENTIAL RECORDS $50.00 DOCUMENT HANDLING 150690 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $4.048.02 ELECTRIC PARTS 150691 CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS $7.951.69 FREIGHT 150692 CONSOLIDATED REPOGRAPHICS $1,980.59 PRINTING SERVICES 150693 CONSUMER PIPE $1,054.01 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 15D694 CONTINENTAL EQUIPMENT B SUPPLY $1.454.32 TOOLS 150695 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $7,151.98 ENGINE PARTS 150696 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $228.10 TRUCK PARTS 150697 COUNTERPART ENTERPRISES $977.07 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES m 150598 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $914.45 ELECTRIC PARTS >C 150699 CRANE PRO SERVICES $10,035.57 CRANE MAINTENANCE ti 150700 CAVE'S BICYCLES,INC. $142.64 BIKE REPAIRS to 150701 JIM DAVIDSON $175.00 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 150702 DELL COMPUTER CORP. $27.424.88 COMPUTERS B MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 150703 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIF. $36,743.26 DENTAL INSURANCE PLAN M.0.1-12-94 3? 150704 THE DIAMOND GROUP $4,00D.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES N 150705 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $4.872.51 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 150706 DISCO PRINT COMPANY $443.11 OFFICE SUPPLIES 150707 ROBERT F.DRIVER ASSOC. $83.877.00 PERSONNEL INSURANCE CONSULTANT 150708 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $563.32 PAINT SUPPLIES 150709 ESP NORTH $210.09 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 150710 EAGLE ENTERPRISES $4,040.63 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 150711 ECOSYSTEMS EN-G 8 ANALYSES $11.739.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 150712 EDWARDS HIGH VACUUM INTER. $19.68 LAB SUPPLIES 150713 EMERGENCY MGMT NETWORK $3,840.00 CPRIFIRST AID TRAINING 150714 ENCHANTER,INC. $2.800.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5-24416 150715 ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND $20.00 PUBLICATIONS 150716 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $1,011.70 LAB SERVICES 150717 ENVIRO PODUCTS $210.75 MISC.HARDWARE 150718 FLUID TECH.SALES $1,056.41 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 150719 FMC CORPORATION $93,365.28 HYDROGEN PEROXIDE M09.14-94 150720 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $6.732.50 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.D.10.9-91 150721 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $254.45 AIR FREIGHT 150722 FILTERLINE CORP $497.49 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 160723 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $14,382.81 FILTERS 150724 FIRSTCHOICE $1.605.35 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT 150725 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $1,329.67 LAB SUPPLIES 150726 CLIFFORD A FORKERT $4,579.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 03/19/96 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 03/20/96 POSTING DATE 03/20/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 150727 FOSS MARITIME,CO. $1,710.05 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 150728 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $86.30 PHOTO SUPPLIES 150729 - FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $206.88 PAINT SUPPLIES 150730 FRANKLIN ELECTRONIC PUBLISHERS $46.53 PUBLICATION 150731 GST,INC. $11,964.62 OFFICE SUPPLIES 150732 GENERAL BINDING CORP. $241.92 OFFICE MACHINE REPAIRS 150733 GE IND&POWER SYSTEMS $2.432.68 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 150734 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $36.40 ELECTRIC PARTS 150735 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $7.031.25 TELEPHONE SERVICES 160736 GIERUCH-MITCHELL,INC. $9,651.13 PUMP PARTS 160737 GOVT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOC. $406.00 PUBLICATIONS 150738 WW GRAINGER,INC. $1,926.D4 COMPRESSOR PARTS 150739 GRASBY S.T.I. $12.077.11 ENGINE PARTS 150740 THOMAS GRAY&ASSOC.,INC. $567.00 LAB TESTING 150741 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC WHOLESALE $288.87 PHONE PARTS 150742 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $89.60 PRINTING 150743 DOA CONSULTANTS $7.672.79 SURVEYING SERVICES MO 8.23-95 X 160744 DAVID R.GRIFFIN $14.116.22 LEGAL SERVICES-TECHITE PIPE M.0.9.14.94 = 150745 DAVID M.GRIFFITH&ASSOC. $11,885.70 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 150746 HR DIRECT $4.95 OFFICE SUPPLIES w 150747 HB TYPE&GRAPHICS $10.78 PRINTING -1 150748 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $4.359.61 TRUCK PARTS 150749 HACH COMPANY $42.92 LAB SUPPLIES I 15D750 KEVIN HADDEN $127.73 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT V4 150751 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $888.79 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 150762 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS $2,190.00 CONTAINER RENTALS 150753 PL HAWN CO,INC.. $99.22 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 150754 HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT $2,083.33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN. 150755 HEWLETT PACKARD $269.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 150756 HOME DEPOT $490.13 SMALL HARDWARE 150757 PIS HUGHES CO,INC. $1.643.16 PAINT SUPPLIES 150758 SHAMSHAD HYDER $1,053.3D EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 150759 IEQ INDUSTRIES $940.00 MACHINE SUPPLIES 150760 IPCO SAFETY $3.742.70 SAFETY SUPPLIES 150761 INFORMATION RESOURCES $875.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 150762 INSTRUMENT LABORATORY $109.29 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 150783 INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH&TECHNICAL ASSITANCE $81600.00 GRANT 160764 INTERMEC S636.11 LAB SUPPLIES 150765 JENDHAM,INC. $660.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 150766 KALLEEN'S COMPUTER PRODUCTS $169.70 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 150767 KEMIRON PACIFIC,INC. $54,140.95 FERRIC CHLORIDE MO 9.27-95 150768 KING BEARING,INC. $103.31 MACHINE SUPPLIES 150769 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $431,48 TOOLS 150770 PENNY KYLE $94.00 PER DIEM 150771 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY CO. $125.90 SAFETY SUPPLIES 150772 LEE&RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC. $24.823.80 ENGINEERING SERVICES FUND NO 9199 • JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 03119IDS PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 03120/96 POSTING DATE 03/20/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 160773 LUSTRE-CAL $11.24 SAFETY 150774 M.S.BELLOWS $53.64 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 150775 MPS $249.97 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 150776 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $738,280.00 CONSTRUCTION P1-3&2 150777 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $24,839.00 CONSTRUCTION P242-2 150178 MIKE MCCARTHY BUICK,INC. $89.322.14 TRUCKS 150779 DONALD F.MCINTYRE $501.23 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 150780 MEASUREMENT VARIABLES,INC. $219.85 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 150781 MECHANICAL DRIVES CO. $373.09 INSTURMENT SUPPLIES 150782 MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. $223.76 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 150783 MICRO CENTER $590.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 150784 MIDWAY MFG.B MACHINING $7.703.23 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 150785 MINNESOTA WESTERN VISUAL PRES. $297.78 LAB SUPPLIES 150786 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3.111.08 UNIFORM RENTALS 150787 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO. $742.00 INSTRUMENT 150788 MONITOR LABS $1,308.48 INSTRUMENT 150789 MICHAEL D.MOORE $389.89 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT m 150790 MORGAN COMPANY $3,358.86 CRANE PARTS X 150791 MOTION INDUSTRIES,INC. $2.355.88 PUMP PARTS = 150792 NATIONAL TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER $5.478.87 TECHNICAL TRAINING b0 150793 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $180.58 PLUMBING SUPPLIES - 150794 NETWORK GENERAL CORP. $6.399.29 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 150795 NORTHERN TELECOM $1,760.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING D 150795 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $5,008.92 OFFICE SUPPLIES 150797 ORANGE COAST PETROLEUM EQUIP. $232.74 TRUCK PARTS 150798 OXYGEN SERVICE $1,733.57 SPECIALTY GASES 150799 COUNTY O ORANGE $180.00 USER FEE ADJUSTMENT CHARGES 150800 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $19.164.27 WORKERS COMPENSATION REIMBURSEMENT 150801 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT $41.304.90 GAP WATER USE M.O.6-9-93 150802 PSSI $1.418.15 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION 150803 PACIFIC PARTS $17.516.50 INSTRUMENT PARTS 150804 PADGETT - THOMPSON $145.00 REGISTRATION 150805 PERMA SEAL $182.83 LURE OIL 150806 PERVO PAINT $783.77 PAINT 150807 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $785.62 REINS.PETTY CASH,TRAINING B TRAVEL 150808 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $138,936.38 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3-2995 150809 PLANNING SOLUTIONS $6,000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 150810 POLYPURE,INC. $12.752.28 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3,11-92 150811 PORT SUPPLY $192.12 BASIN SUPPLIES 150812 POSITIVE FORMULATORS,INC. $197.46 CHEMICALS 150813 POSTAGE BY PHONE $5.000.00 POSTAGE 150814 POSTMASTER $450.00 ANNUAL PO BOX FEE 150815 PROMINENT FLUID CONTROL,INC. $79940 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 160816 PUTZMEISTER,INC. $399.34 PUMP PARTS 150817 QUICKSTART TECHNOLOGIES $5,626.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 150818 RB R INSTRUMENTS $572.65 ELECTRIC PARTS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 03/19/96 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 03/20196 POSTING DATE 03120M WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 150619 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $2.062.75 TRASH REMOVAL 150820 RAIN FOR RENT $1.989.34 SEWER BY-PASS PIPING 150821 - BOLT DELIVERY $48.00 FREIGHT 150822 RM MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL $367.11 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 150823 GEORGE ROBERTSON $693.25 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 150824 RYAN-HERCO $6.16 METAL 150825 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $1.407.08 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 150826 SARTORIUS CORP. $6.50 LAB SUPPLIES 150827 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTL $38,628.15 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.64k94 150828 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $265.98 SPECIALTY GASES 150829 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $1.845.29 TOOLS 150830 SHASTA ELECTRIC $63.806.00 CONSTRUCTION J31-2 150831 SHURELUCK SALES $1,076.31 TOOLSIHARDWARE 150832 SIEVERS INSTRUMENTS,INC. $395.19 LAB SUPPLIES 150833 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO. $81.36 LAB SUPPLIES 15GS34 SKILL PATH SEMINARS $99.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 150835 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $860.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS m 150836 M.LEE SMITH PUBLISHERS ASSN. $417.00 PUBLICATION >( 150837 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP. $178.82 TOOLS = 150838 SOUTH BAY FOUNDRY,INC. $6,465.00 MANHOLE FRAMES&COVERS pD 150839 SO COASTARMY&NAVY SURPLUS $85.99 DUFFLE BAGS 160840 SOUTH COASTWATER $125.00 LAB SUPPLIES 15GS41 SO CALIF EDISON CO $37,133.20 POWER D 150842 SO CALIF MARINE INSTITUTE $600.00 OCEAN MONITORIING 150843 SO.CALIF.WATER CO. $285.42 WATER USE 150844 SPARLINO INSTRUMENT CO.,INC. 5182.90 METER 150845 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $2,063.16 MECHANICAL PARTS 150846 TONER SYSTEM INTERNATIONAL $1,412.52 PRINTER SUPPLIES 150847 TONY'S LOCK&SAFE SERVICE $662A7 LOCKS&KEYS 150848 ED TORRES $88.90 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 150849 TRADE SERVICE CORP $1,081.91 PUBLICATIONS 150850 TREBOR ELECTRONICS $682.77 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 150851 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $207.36 TRUCK PARTS 150852 TRUESUAIL LABS $1,494.20 LAB SERVICES 150853 JO TUCKER&SON,INC. $1,303.79 INSTRUMENT PARTS 160854 U.S.AUTO GLASS CENTERS $100.81 TRUCK PARTS 150855 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $221.00 LAB SUPPLIES 150856 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $431.65 PARCEL SERVICES 160857 DATAVAULT/US SAFE DEPOSIT CO. $146.82 BACK-UP DISK STORAGE 160858 VWR SCIENTIFIC $3.011.34 LAB SUPPLIES 150859 VALIN CORPORATION $31.65 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 150860 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $336.88 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 150861 VALTEKC/O R.M.CONTROL $529.78 INSTRUMENT PARTS 150862 VARION ASSOCIATES,INC. $182.09 LAB SUPPLIES 150863 VERTEX TECHNOLOGIES,INC. $123.62 FIBER OPTICS 150864 WACKENHUT CORP. $15.614.81 CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 03119M PAGE6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 03/20/96 POSTING DATE 0320I98 WARRANTNO. VENDOR AMOUNT 150865 CARLWARREN B CO. $559.64 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR 150866 BANANA BLUEPRINT $460.87 PRINTING M.O.11-07-94 150867 WATERS CORPORATION $3,856.26 SERVICE AGREEMENT 150668 GARY WELMAN $1,298.32 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 150869 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $108.39 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 150870 WESCO $5,690.04 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 150871 NANCY WNEATLEY 61,268.14 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 150872 RICKARD YOUNG PRODUCTS $782.07 INSTRUMENT PARTS TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 03/20/96 $2,167,328.39 SUMMARY AMOUNT 92 OPER FUND $230.46 93 OPER FUND $8,078.71 93 CAP FAC FUND $16,133.48 m 87 OPER FUND $7.997.97 X 911 OPER FUND $8,902.55 2 011 CAP FAC FUND 613.31 to JT OPER FUND $761.338.90 CORF $1,143.601.05 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $58.550.50 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $162.481.48 i m 52,167,328.39 1 FUND NO 9199 - Jf DIRT WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 03/19/98 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/03/96 POSTING DATE 04/03/96 WARRANT NO, VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 150895 ASL CONSULTING ENGINEERS $200.00 ATWOOD SUBTRUNK PLAN PREPERATION 150896 ATBT-MEGACOM SERVICE $967.8D LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 150897 ATBT-MEGACOM SERVICE $5.04 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 150898 ATBT-CELLULAR OR SR $1.05 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 150899 ATMS $1.794.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 150900 ACOUSTIC STANDARDS,INC. $859.98 SAFETY SUPPLIES 150901 AIR PRODUCTS B CHEMICALS $18.322.00 O&M AGREEMENT OXYGEN.SYST.M.0.8-9A9 150902 AMERIDATA $3.72 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 150903 AMERICAN AIR FILTER,INC. $61.67 MECHANICAL PARTS 150904 AMERICAN AIRLINES $5,410.55 TRAVEL SERVICES 150905 AMERICAN SIGMA $3.741.41 SAMPLER 150906 AMERICAN VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS $2,759.40 SERVICE AGREEMENT 160907 SLAKE P.ANDERSON $354.96 REIMBURSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE 150908 ANIXTER-DISTRIBUTION $106.75 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 150909 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT $1,289.81 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 150810 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. $80.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL 160911 AMSA $425.00 WINTER TECHNICAL CONFERENCE 150912 RANDOLPH AUSTIN CO. $677.69 LAB SUPPLIES XfTl 160913 AWARDS B TROPHIES $63.20 PLAQUES = 150914 BC WIRE ROPE B RIGGING $355.08 AUTO PARTS �--' 150915 BFI MEDICAL WASTE SYSTEMS $45.40 WASTE DISPOSAL 150916 BKK LANDFILL $2.982.12 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 -I 150917 E S BABCOCK B SONS INC $540.00 LAB ANALYSIS Lp 150918 BANANA BLUEPRINT $24,653.28 PRINTING M.0.11-07-94 I 150919 BANK OF AMERICA $158.81 BANKING SERVICES 150920 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $465.05 BATTERIES ISG921 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $4.858.45 LAB SUPPLIES 150922 BERENSON COMMUNICATIONS $401.07 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 150923 BIO-GRO DIVISION $40.482.57 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M0426-95 150924 BISHOP COMPANY $5.663.89 TOOLS 160925 BLACK BOX CORP - $108.34 FIBER OPTIC TRANSCEIVER REPAIR 150926 BLOOMBERG L.P. $4,832.59 FINANCIAL MONITORING M.0.4-14-93 150927 BLUE CHIP COMPUTER SYSTEMS $2,600.23 COMPUTER B SOFTWARE 150928 BOOT BARN $247.51 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 150929 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $6.728.17 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 160930 BUSH B ASSOCIATES,INC. $1.552.00 SURVEYING SERVICES MO 641-94 150931 BYRUM,HOLLAND B GRIFFIN $4,800.07 LEGAL SERVICES-TECHITE MO 1-11-95 150932 CCI TECHNOLOGIES $1,043.00 SPICE CABLES 150933 CALTROL,INC. $1.471.57 HARDWARE 150934 CALIFORNIA LABORATORIES&DEV $4.195.00 REMOVE FUME HOODS FROM OLD LAB J-11-1 150935 CALLAN ASSOCIATES,INC. $4.976.78 INVESTMENT ADVISOR SERVICES 150936 CAPITAL WESTWARD $278.28 MECHANICAL PARTS 150937 JOHN CARDLLO ENGINEERS $54,656.93 ENGINEERING SERVICE J-33.2 150938 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $2.470.03 OFFICE FURNITURE 150939 CENTURY MICRO PRODUCTS $5,666.99 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 150940 CERFNET $90.80 COMPUTER SERVICES FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE DM9196 PAGE2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID O4103/96 POSTING DATE 04/03/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 150941 CHASE,ROTCHFORD,DRUKKER $7,200.65 LEGAL SERVICES MO 12-14-94 150942 CHEMWEST,INC. $18.720.75 PUMP PARTS 150943 CHROME CRANKSHAFT,INC. $1,300.00 PUMP PARTS 150944 CLEMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL $8,702.70 CONSULTANT-LANDFILL PROJECT M07-31-95 150945 COLE-PARMER INSTRUMENT CO. $170.56 LAS SUPPLIES 160946 COMMUNICATIONS PERFORMANCE GROUP $17,860.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MO 10-25-95 150947 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $12,664.08 PUMP PARTS 150948 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $5,482.15 ELECTRIC PARTS 150949 CONSOLIDATED REPOGRAPHICS $904.06 PRINTING SERVICES 150950 CONSUMER PIPE $585.57 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 150951 CONTINENTAL EQUIPMENT&SUPPLY $768.50 TOOLS 150952 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS O C $2.000.50 CONSULTING SERVICES M.0.8.11-93 IW953 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $249.50 ENGINE PARTS 150954 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $264.30 TRUCK PARTS 150956 COUNTERPART ENTERPRISES $45.53 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 150956 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $934.08 ELECTRIC PARTS 150957 DATA SYSTEMS SERVICE $2,231.42 SOFTWARE TIT 150958 ALBERT W.DAVIES,INC. $565.819.80 CONSTRUCTION 3-36R X 150959 DELL MARKETING L.P. $39,031.36 COMPUTERS = 150960 DELTA PACKAGING PRODUCTS,INC. $146.00 LAB SUPPLIES ey 150961 DIETERICH-POST CO. $557.37 INSTRUMENTPARTS 150962 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $6.553.59 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 150963 MICHAEL F.DILLON $4,867.72 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CO 150964 ROBERT F.DRIVER ASSOC. $22.075.00 PERSONNEL INSURANCE CONSULTANT 150965 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $192.42 PAINT SUPPLIES N 150966 ESP NORTH $1.103.16 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 150967 EAGLE DISTRIBUTION $285A3 AUTO PARTS 150968 ELECTRO TEST,INC. $3,000.00 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 150969 ELECTRA-BOND,INC. $4.821.81 PUMP PARTS 150970 EMERGENCY MGMT NETWORK $3.690.00 CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING 150971 ENCHANTER,INC. $3.500.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5.24-95 150972 EXCIDE ELECTRONICS $3.985.99 CONTROL CENTER U.P.S.REPAIR 150973 EXPO C/O $16,017.04 FIBER OPTIC TEST KIT 150974 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $4,911.25 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.1D9-91 150975 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $154.75 AIR FREIGHT 150976 FIBERTRON $2,586.00 FIBER OPTIC CABLE 150977 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE $720.00 PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORT 150978 FIRST CHOICE $3,310.92 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT 150979 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $533.38 LAB SUPPLIES 150980 FISONS INSTRUMENTS $360.64 SERVICE AGREEMENT 150981 FLAT S VERTICAL,INC. $215.00 CONCRETE CUTTING 150982 FLICKINGER CO. $144.91 VALVE 150983 FLO-SYSTEMS $15,869.34 PUMP PARTS 150984 FORD SAWAJOT MGMT GROUP $5,718.16 CONSOLIDATION SERVICES 150985 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $155.32 PHOTO SUPPLIES 150986 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $105.00 WATER USE FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 03/29/96 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04103M POSTING DATE 04M3196 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 150987 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $1.059.55 PAINT SUPPLIES 150988 THE FOXBORO CO. $71.20 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 150989 FRANKLIN QUEST CO. $360.24 OFFICE SUPPLIES 150990 FRY'S ELECTRONICS $742.34 ELECTRONIC B COMPUTER SUPPLIES 150991 GST,INC. $5.543.15 OFFICE SUPPLIES 150992 GTE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM $93.070.75 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 150993 GARAHL LUMBER CO. $255.72 LUMBERIHARDWARE 150994 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $2,679.74 CHEMICALS 150995 GAUGE REPAIR SERVICE $203.22 GAUGE REPAIR 150996 GENERAL BINDING CORP. $550A2 OFFICE MACHINE REPAIRS 150997 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY OO. $1.222.34 ELECTRIC PARTS 150998 GENERAL PETROLEUM $9.55003 GASOLINE 150999 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $207.30 TELEPHONE SERVICES 151000 GENERAL TELEPHONE $808,56 RELOCATE 2 TELEPHONE DUCTS 3.36R 151001 LIFE TECHNOLOGIES I GIBCO I SRL $128.50 LAB SUPPLIES 151002 GIERLICH-MITCHELL,INC. $20.39329 PUMP PARTS 151003 GOLDEN STATE MACHINERY,INC. $42.98 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 151004 WW GRAINGER.INC. $43.36 COMPRESSOR PARTS m 151005 GRAPHIC CONTROLS $16594 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES = 151008 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $818.99 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES t- 151007 GRASSY S.T.I. $655,72 ENGINE PARTS 151005 DGA CONSULTANTS $2,100.00 SURVEYING SERVICES 3-36R 151009 GRIFFIN CARRICK $15,200.75 LEGAL SERVICES-TECHITE C, 151010 HR PRESS $187.50 SOFTWARE 1 151011 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $96.32 TRUCK PARTS W 151012 HACH COMPANY $564.52 LAB SUPPLIES 151013 PL HAWN CO,INC. $2,494.58 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 151014 INGRID HELLEBRAND $100.26 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 151016 HILTI,INC. $BOS.B1 TOOLS 151016 HOME DEPOT $152.76 SMALL HARDWARE 151017 HYCLONE LABORATORIES,INC. $511.71 LAB SUPPLIES 151018 IDEKX $1.616.25 LAB SUPPLIES 151019 IPCO SAFETY $6,712.69 SAFETY SUPPLIES 151020 INDUSTRIAL STEAM $1,902.87 PUMP 151021 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $558.42 CONNECTORS 151022 INTEGRATED BUSINESS INTERIORS $60.00 CHAIR REPAIR 151023 THE IRVINE CO. $109.688.55 BAYSIDE SEWER RELOCATION MO 10.10.73 151024 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $69.16 WATER USE 151026 JAMISON ENGINEERING $18.587.50 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 151026 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $1,031.38 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 151027 DEE JASPAR B ASSOC. $1,31C84 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 151028 JAYS CATERING $1,042.02 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE 151029 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $334.64 ELECTRIC PARTS 151030 JONES CHEMICALS,INC. $10,837.87 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE MO 4-26-95 151031 KALLEEN'S COMPUTER PRODUCTS $414.10 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 151032 KEMIRON PACIFIC,INC. $27.560.46 FERRIC CHLORIDE MO 9.27-95 FUND NO 9199 - JF DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 03/29/96 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/03018 POSTING DATE 04/03/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 161033 KENNEDY HYDRAULICS $1.118.74 MOTOR REPAIRS 151034 KERRY CONSULTING GROUP $6.179.06 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MO 11-15-95 151035 - KIMBLE/KONTES GLASSWARE $97.63 LAB SUPPLIES 151036 KING BEARING,INC. $809.02 MACHINE SUPPLIES 151037 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $3,055.03 TOOLS 151038 LEAK ALERT SERVICE CO. $059.99 FUEL TANK MONITOR REPAIR 151039 LATRONICS $430.94 TRAINING EQUIPMENT 151040 LEADERSHIP DIRECTORIES,INC. $358.76 SUBSCRIPTIONS 151041 LEE&RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC. $1,840.95 ENGINEERING SERVICES 151042 MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY CORP. $617.47 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 151043 MANDIC MOTORS $119.00 TOWING SERVICES 161044 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $57.98 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 151045 MCGARRY CENTRAL BUSINESS PROD $524.20 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 151046 DONALD F.MCINTYRE $100.08 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 151047 MCWELCO RACK-N-BOX CO. $1,287.83 TOOLBOXES 151040 MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. $433.25 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 161049 MICRO MOTION $1.125.79 CONTROLLER REPAIR m 151050 MICROFLEX MEDICAL CORP. $1,136.00 SAFETY SUPPLIES X 151051 MIDWAY MFG.&MACHINING $19,067.64 MECHANICAL REPAIRS = 151052 MILLTRONICS $3,050.40 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES I Ly 151053 MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES CO. $1,147.77 SAFETY SUPPLIES 151064 MINNESOTA WESTERN VISUAL PRES. $355.06 LAB SUPPLIES 151055 MISSION INDUSTRIES $2.380.12 UNIFORM RENTALS CO 151056 MONITOR LABS $1.698.80 INSTRUMENT J 151057 MOTION INDUSTRIES,INC. $523.61 PUMP PARTS 151058 NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS $35.25 PUBLICATION 151059 NATIONAL TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER $1.785.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 151060 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $797.56 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 151061 NEUTRON $27,840.89 ANIONIC POLYMER M.O.8.10-94 151062 NEW HORIZONS COMPUTER CENTERS,INC. $2.940.00 SOFTWARE TRAINING CLASSES 151063 NEWARK ELECTRONICS $789.40 INSTRUMENT PARTS 151064 NICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY $1,103.63 LUBRICANTSIDIESEL FUEL 151065 NORTEL PRODUCT TRAINING $130.00 PUBLICATIONS 151066 NORTH BAY WORK CARE $338.60 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 151067 NORTHERN TELECOM $1,500.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 151068 NORTHERN TELECOM $2,245.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 151069 ROSERTJ.00TEN $364.05 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 151070 ORACLE CORPORATION $3,000.00 SOFTWARE 151071 ORANGE COAST PIPE SUPPLY $123.57 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 151072 ORANGE COURIER $181.20 COURIER SERVICES 151073 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. $803.28 FITTINGS 151074 OXYGEN SERVICE $907.76 SPECIALTY GASES 151076 MUNICIPAL COURT OF CALIF. $90.00 USE FEE ADJUSTMENT CHARGES 151076 PSSI $2,107.80 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION 151077 PACIFIC CLIPPINGS $163.40 CONTRACT SERVICE 151078 PACIFIC PARTS $10.045.71 INSTRUMENT PARTS FUND NO 9199 - Jr DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 03129/96 PAGE 5 REPORT NLJMBERAP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/03/96 POSTING DATE 04/03/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 151079 PACIFIC BELL $1.299.76 TELEPHONE SERVICES 151080 PADRE JANITORIAL SUPPLY $2,013.58 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 151081 PAGENET $1,154.44 RENTAL EQU'PMENT 151082 PALERMO&ASSOCIATES $7,600.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 151083 PALMIERI,TYLER,WIENER, $961.00 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.6-12-91 151084 PARAGON CABLE $36.78 CABLE SERVICES 151085 PARKHOUSE TIRE,INC. $963.29 TIRES 151086 PARTS UNLIMITED $206.57 TRUCK PARTS 151087 RONAN ENGINEERING $142.60 INSTRUMENT PARTS 161088 PEABODY $1,774.73 PUMP PARTS 151089 PEDERSON COMMUNICATIONS $19,103.20 VOICE&DATA REWIRE-ADMIN.BLDG. 151090 PENI4ALL COMPANY $650.00 CONCRETE REMOVAL 151091 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $1,173.92 REIMB.PETTY CASH,TRAINING TRAVEL 151092 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $131,963.91 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3-29.95 151093 PLANNING SOLUTIONS $5,250.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 151094 POLYMETRICS,INC. $1,262.75 LAB SUPPLIES 151095 POLYPURE,INC. $19.922.76 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92 m 151096 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $112.00 ICE FOR SAMPLES x 151097 PRIZO&PRIZO $5,764.49 DIST.3 CONNECTION FEE FEFUND = 151098 PUMPING SOLUTIONS,INC. E712.77 PUMP PARTS to 151099 OUESTRON CORP. $1.760.00 LAB SUPPLIES 151100 OUICKSTART TECHNOLOGIES $1,876.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 151101 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $1.228.01 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS OC 151102 RED WING SHOES $241.36 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 151103 BOLT DELIVERY $59.00 FREIGHT 161104 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DIST. $990.59 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 151105 RE-NU OFFICE SYSTEMS $420.00 RECONFIGURE OFFICE SPACE 151108 RM MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL $373.80 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 151107 ROBINSON FERTILIZER CO..INC. $1.422.30 GRASS&WEED KILLER 151108 JOSEPH T.RYERSON&SON,INC. $2,272.95 STAINLESS STEEL PLATES 151109 SKC WEST - $116.94 SAFETY SUPPLIES 151110 SARBS-PDC $60.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 161111 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $603.99 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 151112 R.CRAIG SCOTT&ASSOC. $31.793.20 LEGAL SERVICES-PERSONNEL ISSUES 151113 SEA COAST DESIGNS $1,587.16 LAB SUPPLIES 151114 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $6,846.10 TOOLS 151115 SHORE PERSONNEL SERVICES $11.500.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 151116 SHURELUCK SALES $12.961.62 TOOLSOIARDWARE 161117 SKALAR,INC. $573.30 LAB SUPPLIES 161118 SKYPARK WALKJN MEDICAL CLINIC $97.34 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 151119 SMITH PIPE&SUPPLY $400.13 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 151120 SOUTH COAST WATER $35.00 LAB SUPPLIES 151121 SO CALIF COASTAL WATER $299,740.00 SO.M.COASTAL WATER RESEARCH PROJECT 151122 SO CALIF EDISON CO $66.489.88 POWER 151123 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $24.939.02 NATURAL GAS 151124 SO.CALIFORNIA MARINE INST. $800.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 0329/95 PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/03/96 POSTING DATE 04/03/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 151125 SOUTHERN CALIF TRANE SERVICE $70.95 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 151126 SQUARE D POWER MGMT $1,250.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 161127 SUPERB ONE-HOUR PHOTO $25.64 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 161120 SYSCOM,INC. $6.900.00 MULTI-USER LICENSE 151129 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $63.94 MECHANICAL PARTS 151130 TIME MOTION TOOLS $863.16 INSTRUMENT PARTS 151131 TONY'S LOCK B SAFE SERVICE $12.39 LOCKS&KEYS 151132 ED TORRES $139.20 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 151133 TRANSMATION,INC. $94.81 INSTRUMENT PARTS 151134 TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY,INC. $3,973.84 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.O.5.11-94 151135 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $682.38 TRUCK PARTS 161136 JG TUCKER&SON,INC. $9,406.94 INSTRUMENT PARTS 151137 TWINING LABORATORIES $1.284.18 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-13-94 151138 USA BLUE BOOK $556.64 MISC.HARDWARE 151139 UNISOURCEB/OR BUTLER PAPER $643.43 OFFICE SUPPLIES 151140 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $146.89 PARCEL SERVICES 151141 VWR SCIENTIFIC $4,473.39 LAB SUPPLIES m 151142 VALIN CORPORATION $111.60 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES X 151143 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $456.05 PLUMBING SUPPLIES = 151144 VALVATE ASSOCIATES $225.64 PLUMBING SUPPLIES D 161145 VAN NOSTRAND REINHOLD $1.040.00 BOOK �-+ 151146 VARIAN ASSOCIATES,INC. $1,296.40 LAB SUPPLIES 151147 VERTEX TECHNOLOGIES,INC. $3,193.62 FIBER OPTICS 00 151148 VILLAGE NURSERIES $243.74 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 151149 WACKENHUT CORP. $6,779.38 CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS 151150 WAL-CON CONSTRUCTION CO. $204.075.37 CONSTRUCTION 5-37-3 151151 WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION $449.50 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT COURSES 151152 WAXIE $372.33 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 151153 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $5,709.63 CAUSTIC SODA MO 8-23-95 151154 WESTERN SWITCHES $121.99 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 151155 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $476.14 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 151158 WESCO $2,370.50 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 161157 WHATMAN $825.33 LAB SUPPLIES 151158 WILLARD MARKING DEVICES $48.49 OFFICE SUPPLIES 151159 ROURKE,WOODRUFF&SPRADLIN $75.975.13 LEGAL SERVICES MO7-26.95 151160 XEROX CORP. $16.721.01 COPIER LEASES i511B1 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $866.00 LAB SUPPLIES 151162 JOHNSON YOKOGAWA CORP. $1.640.31 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 04/03/96 $2.480,313.44 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 03a9196 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/03/96 POSTING DATE 04/D3/96 SUMMARY AMOUNT 02 OPER FUND $3.171.80 02 CAP FAC FUND $213.79 #3 OPER FUND $16,045.90 #3 CAP FAC FUND $597.473.69 #5 OPER FUND $5.994.45 #5 CAP FAC FUND $109.688.65 #7 OPER FUND $6,385.10 #7 CAP FAC FUND $1.410.09 #11 OPER FUND $994.94 #11 CAP FAC FUND $16,505.00 #14 OPER FUND $365.21 #14 CAP PAC FUND $1.349.55 #5&6 OPER FUND $3,315.25 #5&6 CAP FAC FUND $206.537.23 #6&7OPER FUND $6,822.36 #7&14 OPER FUND $5,856.10 JT OPER FUND $583.982.67 X CORF $355,959.46 = SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $51,041.23 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $507,201.07 b] —1 $2.480.313.44 D0 V FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE-VARIOUS PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID-MISCELLANEOUS HANDWRITE WARRANTS WARRANT DATE WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 0327196 160892 PAULINE JOHNSTON AND $6.015.00 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 0328/96 150893 THE BALBOA BAY CLUB $4,394.70 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 0328196 150594 JOHN KELSO $68.50 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 04/04/96 151163 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $3,486.79 LAB SUPPLIES 04/04/96 151164 COUNTY CLERK $25.00 PERMIT 04/04/96 151165 COUNTY OF ORANGE $90.60 USE FEE ADJUSTMENT CHARGES 04/04/96 151166 ED TORRES $250.00 PER DIEM 04/05196 151167 THE BALBOA BAY CLUB $3,227,30 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM W105MB 151168 DEE TURNER $7,776.31 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 04109M 151169 ATMS $897.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING TOTAL CLAIMS PAID $21.130.60 SUMMARY AMOUNT X67 OPER FUND $90.00 = JT OPER FUND $2.671.47 CORF $1,396.66 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $22,381.81 .� JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $590.66 j� $27,130.60 r JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING MAY 22, 1996 Each District Agenda Item (4): Annual Election of Chair and Chair Pro Tem of each District's Board. Summary In accordance with the Districts' policies, a Chair and Chair pro tern for each District Board is elected annually at the May meeting. The Boards' rules of procedures are as follows: Chair of the District -A Chair(and Chair pro tem) shall be elected by majority vote as the first order of business by the members of each District's Board of Directors at the first meeting in May of each year, and said Chair(and Chair pro tem) shall serve at the pleasure of the majority of said members. For the information of the new Directors, each Chair automatically becomes a member of the Executive Committee, which meets on an as needed basis at the call of the Joint Chair. This Committee also includes the Joint Chair, Vice Joint Chair, the representatives of the County Board of Supervisors and each past Joint Chair who is currently active. The Executive Committee's function is to study and make recommendations to the Joint Boards concerning major issues and policy matters. For example, the Executive Committee is currently dealing with Consolidation issues. Those members of the Executive Committee are also able to participate in CASA(California Association of Sanitation Agencies) Workshops held throughout the year. The current Chair and Chair pro tem are as follows: District No. Chair Chair Pro tern 1 Pat McGuigan James M. Ferryman 2 John Collins Daniel T. Welch 3 Sal A. Sapien Burnie Dunlap 5 Jan Debay William G. Steiner 6 James M. Ferryman Jan Debay 7 Barry Hammond Thomas R. Saltarelli 11 Victor Leipzig Shirley Dettloff 13 John M. Gullixson Bob Zemel 14 Thomas R. Saltarelli Mark A. Murphy Annual nominations for Joint Chair are made at the regular June meeting and the election takes place at the regular July meeting. Annual nominations and election of the Vice Joint Chair are conducted at the regular July Meeting. J1WPDOCSSV G96MAYM5.4 r, JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING MAY 22, 1996 Agenda Item (9): consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts (each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District). Summary See attached listing of claim payments. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of payment of claims listing. 11WPWL�BNGPAMPYB315.8 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4112/96 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/17/95 POSTING DATE 04117AT5 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 151202 AGU $17.50 PUBLICATION 151203 ASL CONSULTING ENGINEERS $423.00 ATWOOD SUSTRUNK PLAN PREPARATION 161204 AT&T-MEGACOM SERVICE $2.737.02 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 151205 AT&T-CELLULAR CR&R $5.05 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 151206 A-Z LOGIC SYSTEMS $356.96 LAB SUPPLIES V11207 ABANNER IDEA $59.26 OFFICE SUPPLIES 15120E ADVANCED COOLING TECHNOLOGY $420.00 ELECTRICPARTS 151209 AIR&WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOC. $295.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 151210 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $36.664.58 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.0.8.9-09 /51211 AIR&WASTE MGMT.ASSOC. $6544 PUBLICATION 151212 ASCE CONTINUING EDUCATION $165.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING 151213 AMERICAN AIRLINES $448.40 TRAVEL SERVICES 151214 THE BOND BUYER $85B.77 SUBSCRIPTION 151215 AMERICAN PAYROLL ASSOC. $124.95 PUBLICATION 15121E AMERICAN SIGMA $20,528,55 TESTING SUPPLIES 151217 AMERICAN VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS $9,695.86 COMPUTER PARTS 151218 AMOCO ENERGY TRADING $47,266.96 NATURAL GAS M06-28-95 151219 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION $24,067.00 SEWERREPAIRS 151220 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL $1.260.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 151221 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $2,270.20 NOTICES&ADS 151222 APPLE ONE $5,958.92 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 151223 AQUATIC BIOASSAY&CONSULTANTS $5.905.00 LAB SERVICES 151224 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT $2,200.74 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 151226 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE,INC. $310.40 TOXIC WASTE REMOVAL 151226 ASSOCIATED CONCRETE PRODUCTS $290.93 BUILDING MATERIALS 151227 ATKIWJONES COMPUTER SERVICE $321.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT 151220 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $3.632.37 PAYROLL SERVICES 151229 AWARDS&TROPHIES $33.40 PLAQUES 151230 BKK LANDFILL $2,272.16 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10.9-91 151231 E S BABCOCK&SONS INC $1,024.00 LAB ANALYSIS 151232 BANANA BLUEPRINT $1,240.98 PRINTING M.0.11-07-94 151233 BANCROFT-WHITNEY CO.. $340.21 PUBLICATION 151234 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $378.59 BATTERIES 151235 BAUER COMPRESSOR $693.22 COMPRESSOR PARTS 161238 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $3,421.82 LAB SUPPLIES 161237 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $329.15 TRUCK WASH TICKETS 161238 A BIEDERMAN,INC. $918.71 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 151239 WT BILJARD $345.11 BUILDING REPAIRS 151240 BIO-GRO DIVISION $45.871.58 RESIDUALS REMOVAL NO 4-26.95 151241 BISHOP'S SANITARY $420.23 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 151242 BOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE $193.95 TRUCK REPAIRS 151243 BON-A-RUES $498.88 TRUCK PARTS 151244 BOOTBARN $360.63 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 161246 CA P $149.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 151246 C.L.TECHNOLOGY $720,00 GAS ANALYSIS SERVICES 151247 CS COMPANY $7,782.49 PLUMBING SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JF DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4112/96 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID D4/17/95 POSTING DATE 04/17/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 151248 CALIF ASSOC.OF SAN.AGENCIES $130.00 WORK CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 161249 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $977.56 SERVICE AGREEMENT 151250 CALIF.DEBT ADVISORY $125.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 151251 CALIFORNIA LABORATORIES&DEV $704.00 FUME HOODS DISPOSAL 151252 CALLAN ASSOCIATES,INC. $4.978.78 INVESTMENT ADVISOR SERVICES 151253 CAMALI CORP. $2.569.61 SERVICE AGREEMENT 151254 CAPITAL ENQUIRY,INC. $165.36 PUBLICATION 151255 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $4.806.15 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-38,J-33 151256 CASA $260.00 WORK CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 151257 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $798.31 OFFICE FURNITURE 151258 CENTURY SAFETY INST.&SUPPLY $1,635.11 SAFETY SUPPLIES 151259 CHEMWEST,INC. $96.84 PUMP PARTS 151260 KIMBERLY CHRISTENSEN $1,113.34 TRAINING EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 151261 CLEMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL $14,000.00 CONSULTANT-LANDFILL PROJECT MO 7-31-95 151262 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $220.84 SERVICE AGREEMENT 151263 COUCH&SONS $69.283.80 CONSTRUCTION M-044 151264 COMMUNICATIONS PERFORMANCE GRP $4,000.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 151265 COMPUSERVE $305.39 COMPUTER SERVICES 151266 CONNELL GM PARTS I DIV. $165.63 TRUCK PARTS 151267 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $2,152.63 ELECTRIC PARTS 151265 CONSOLIDATED PLASTICS CO. $341.97 PUMP 151269 CONSUMER PIPE $85.67 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 151270 CONTINENTAL EQUIPMENT&SUPPLY $66.93 TOOLS 151271 COOK BROTHERS $437.37 VALVE 151272 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $1.021.90 ENGINE PARTS 161273 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $359.35 TRUCK PARTS 151274 CRANE PRO SERVICES $416.09 CRANE REPAIR 151275 CSUS FOUNDATION $108.26 OPERATOR TRAINING 151276 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION $230.02 FUELTAXES 151277 DME,INC. $555.98 COMPRESSOR PARTS 151278 DAILY PILOT $222.00 NOTICES&ADS 151279 DELL MARKETING LP. $16.189.98 COMPUTER 151280 DEL MAR ANALYTICAL $950.00 LABANALYSIS 161281 DEZURICK AND/OR CS CO. $2,025.66 VALVES 151282 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $392.51 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 151283 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $940.00 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 151284 OVALS SALES $81.00 FITTINGS 151285 ESP NORTH $666.75 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 151286 ENCHANTER,INC. $2.600.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5-24-95 - 151287 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $867.70 LAB SUPPLIES 151288 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE CENTER $399.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 151289 FLUID TECH.SALES $226.91 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 161290 F&M WELDING,INC. $8,566.12 HAND RAILS 151291 FMC CORPORATION $41,054.34 HYDROGEN PEROXIDE MO9-1494 151292 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $4,181.25 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.1U-9-91 151293 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $33.25 AIR FREIGHT FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4112196 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/17/95 POSTING DATE 04I17195 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 151294 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $181.11 FILTERS 151295 FIRST CHOICE $2,981.34 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT 151296 FORMA SCIENTIFIC,INC. $9.203.25 LAB SUPPLIES 161291 CLIFFORD A FORKERT $1,812.50 SURVEYING SERVICES MO 64.95 161298 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $309.72 PHOTO SUPPLIES 151299 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $11,101.80 WATER USE 151300 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $225.74 PAINT SUPPLIES 151301 FRANKLIN ELECTRONIC PUBLISHERS $123.83 PUBLICATIONS 151302 CITY OF FULLERTON $116.16 WATER USE 151303 EST,INC. $12,258.60 OFFICE SUPPLIES 151304 GTE TELEPHONE OPERATIONS $2.184.29 TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT 151305 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $3.363.63 CHEMICALS 151308 BE IND 8 POWER SYSTEMS $3,699.60 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 161307 GENERAL PETROLEUM $9.042.86 GASOLINE 151308 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1,051.39 TELEPHONE SERVICES 151309 GIERLICH-MITCHELL,INC. $2.055.94 PUMP PARTS 151310 GRASSY S.T.I. $1.169.29 ENGINE PARTS 151311 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $201.09 PRINTING 161312 DGA CONSULTANTS $6,340.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.64-94 161313 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $95.32 TRUCK PARTS 151314 HARBOUR ENGINEERING $5,191.80 MECHANICAL PARTS 151315 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $129.15 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 161316 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS $2.190.00 CONTAINER RENTALS 161317 PL HAWN CO,INC. $6,245.19 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 151318 HELLO $218.95 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 151319 HELPMATES PERSONNEL SERVICES $7,634.01 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 151320 HILTI,INC. $6.185.88 TOOLS 151321 HOME DEPOT $640.64 SMALL HARDWARE 151322 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $256.66 PAINT SUPPLIES 151323 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $22.323.24 WATER USE 151324 HUNTINGTON AMC I JEEP I RENAULT $176.60 AUTO PARTS 151325 IAML $1.675.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING 151328 IDM CONTROLS,INC. $530.13 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 151327 IPCO SAFETY $869.33 SAFETY SUPPLIES 161328 IMAGING PLUS $550.46 OFFICE SUPPLIES 161329 INDUSTRIAL FILTER MFG. $2.400.00 FILTER 161330 INDUSTRIAL STEAM $1.377.20 PUMP 151331 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $1.334.42 CONNECTORS 161332 ISI INFORTEXT $770.42 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 151333 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. $75.68 TRUCK PARTS 151334 INNOVATION GROUP WEST $520.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING 161335 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $1.131.48 BATTERIES 161336 IRVINE PHOTO GRAPHICS $13.67 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 161337 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $10.44 WATER USE 151338 J2 PRINTING SERVICES $386.26 PRINTING 161339 JH RECOGNITION CO. $853.17 SERVICE AWARDS FUND NO 0199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4112M PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04117/95 POSTING DATE 04/17/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 151340 JAMISON ENGINEERING $2,000.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 151341 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $279.46 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 151342 JAYS CATERING $597.34 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE 161343 KALLEEN'S COMPUTER PRODUCTS $143.67 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 151344 KEMIRON PACIFIC.INC. $170,320.60 FERRIC CHLORIDE MO 9.27-96 161345 KING BEARING,INC. $460.27 MACHINE SUPPLIES 151346 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $2.055.05 TOOLS 151347 PENNY KYLE $220.05 TRAINING EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 151348 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $1,232.87 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICE 151349 LAMOTTE COMPANY $81.97 SULFIDE TEST KIT 151350 LAW/CRANDAL,INC. $1,530.00 SOIL TESTING 7-13-94 151351 ORANGE COUNTY DIVISION $30.75 PUBLICATION 151352 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES $95.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING 151353 LIKE NU TILE $280.00 RESTROOM TILE REPAIR 151354 MEC ANALYTICAL $1,108.00 LAB ANALYSIS 151355 R.F.MACDONALD CO. $29.45 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 151356 MANDIC MOTORS $45.00 TOWING SERVICES 161357 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION.INC. $1.259,733.50 CONSTRUCTION P1-36-2 151358 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $195.42 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 151359 MIKE MCCARTHY BUICK,INC. $17,220.76 NEW TRUCK 151380 DONALD F.MCINTYRE $216.93 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 151361 MIDWAY MFG.&MACHINING $375.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 161362 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3,998.81 UNIFORM RENTALS 151363 MONITOR LABS $120.78 INSTRUMENT 151364 MOODYS INVESTORS SERVICE $7,500.00 COP RATING MAINTENANCE FEES 151365 MORGAN COMPANY $520.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 151366 MORTON SALT $516.36 SALT 161387 SAM MOW13RAY $1.053.42 TRAINING EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 151368 THE NEWS $76.00 SUBSCRIPTION 151369 NICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY $2.935.65 LUBRICANTS/DIESEL FUEL 151370 NORTEL PRODUCT TRAINING $2,660.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 151371 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $1,212.77 SAFETY GLASSES 151372 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $13,217.27 OFFICE SUPPLIES 161373 OLSTEN STAFFING SERVICES $3,584.00 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 151374 ROBERTJ.00TEN $165.00 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 151375 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL $2.707.44 CHEMICALS 151376 ORANGE COUNTY PUMP CO. $4,048.76 PUMPS 161377 ORANGE COURIER $182.95 COURIER SERVICES 151378 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. $339.27 FITTINGS 151379 OXYGEN SERVICE $1,746.70 SPECIALTY GASES 151380 COUNTY OF ORANGE $90.00 AUDIT/CONT.PROCESSING FEE 151381 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $5.743.98 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP 151352 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT $37,753.80 GAP WATER USE M.O.6.9-93 161383 PC SERVICE SOURCE $114.00 PRINTER PARTS 151384 PACIFIC PARTS $6.960.10 INSTRUMENT PARTS 151385 PACIFIC BELL $15.12 TELEPHONE SERVICES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/12MG PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/11/95 POSTING DATE 04JI7195 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 151386 PADGETT - THOMPSON $346.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 151387 PARKHOUSE TIRE,INC. $392.21 TIRES 151388 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $659.25 REIMB.PETTY CASH 151389 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS $7,416,85 CONSULTING SERVICE 151390 POLYPURE,INC. $20,015.93 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92 151391 POWER SYSTEMS $236.99 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 151392 PROCESS CONTROL SYSTEMS $104.19 REPAIR 151393 PRYOR RESOURCES,INC. $99.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING 151394 PUBLIC SECTOR EXCELLENCE $3.150.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING CONSULTANT 151395 RJN GROUP,INC. $995.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 151396 RMCONTROLS $41.41 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 151397 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $2.082.75 TRASH REMOVAL 151398 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO. $241.88 LAB SUPPLIES 151399 REAL TIME SYSTEMS CDR $8.135.20 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 151400 RED WING SHOES $143.09 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 151401 BOLT DELIVERY $24.00 FREIGHT 151402 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DIST. $2.152.92 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 151403 RENOLD INC. $60.59 MECHANICAL PARTS 151404 RM MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL $373.80 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 151405 RYAN-HERCO $33.46 METAL 151406 JOSEPH T.RYERSON&SON,INC. $1.742.88 METAL PLATES 151407 SAFETY WEST $52.43 INSTRUMENT PARTS 151408 SANTA FIE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $1,747.38 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 151409 SARTORIUS CORP. 5255.00 LAB SUPPLIES 151410 SCHWING AMERICA,INC. $1.022.70 PUMP PARTS 151411 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTL $18.120.91 OCEAN MONITORING MO 6.28-95 161412 SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS,INC. $976.70 LAB REPAIRS 151413 SEA COAST DESIGNS $309.78 LAB SUPPLIES 151414 CITY OF SEAL BEACH $643.96 WATER USE 151415 SELCO PRODUCTS CO. $367.27 METER 151416 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $1.199.96 TOOLS 161417 SHURELUCK SALES $8,39B.48 TOOLSMARDWARE 151418 SIEMON,LARSON&MARSH $1,226.00 LEGAL SERVICES 151419 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $350.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 151420 THE SMITH GROUP $1,237.30 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 151421 SOUTH COAST WATER $520.00 LAB SUPPLIES 151422 SO CALIF EDISON CO $18.54 POWER 151423 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $1.003.45 NATURAL GAS 151424 SO.CALIFORNIA MARINE INST. $800.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 151425 SPEX CHEMICAL&SAMPLE PREP $1.098.05 LAB SUPPLIES 151426 SRECO FLEXIBLE $6.066.33 SAFETY SUPPLIES 151427 STANDARD&POORS CORP $1,000.00 COP CONTRACT SERVICE 151426 SUPERB ONE-HOUR PHOTO $21.84 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 151429 SUPER CHEM CORP. $1,553.06 CHEMICALS 161430 SUPER ICE CORP. $80.22 LAB SUPPLIES 151431 TESTAR MVS/DIV CERPLEX $431.00 COMPUTER REPAIR FUNDNO 9199 JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 4112MB PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/17/95 POSTING DATE 04/17195 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 151432 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $3,360.46 MECHANICAL PARTS 151433 TOSHIBA INTERNATIONAL $1,998.40 INSTRUMENT PARTS 151434 DANIEL TREMBLAY $1,939.98 TRAINING EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 151435 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $578.30 TRUCK PARTS 161436 JG TUCKER&SON,INC. $2,000.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS 151437 UNISOURCEB/OR BUTLER PAPER $545.23 OFFICE SUPPLIES 151438 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $35.09 PARCEL SERVICES 151439 UNIV OF TEXAS/AUSTIN $500.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 151440 VWR SCIENTIFIC $4,810.19 LAB SUPPLIES 151441 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $63.21 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 151442 VERTEX TECHNOLOGIES,INC. $939.40 FIBER OPTICS 151443 VORTEX INDUSTRIES $925.00 BUILDING REPAIRS 151444 WACKENHUT CORP. $3,389.68 CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS 151445 WALCON CONSTRUCTION CO. $232,522.71 CONSTRUCTION 5-37-3 151446 CARL WARREN&CO. $5,043.93 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR 161447 WAXIE $792.77 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 161448 WESTINGHOUSE,ENERGY SER. $1.450.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 151449 WESTIN SANTA CLARA $240.90 HOTEL RESERVATIONS 151450 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $1,445.91 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 151451 WHATMAN $792.09 LAB SUPPLIES 151452 NANCY WHEATLEY $507.24 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 151453 WHESSOE VAREC $585.00 VALVES 151464 JUDITH A.WILSON $77.18 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 151455 WITEG $411.61 LAB SUPPLIES 151456 WOLFE AND ASSOCIATES,INC. $280.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 151457 XEROX CORP. $2,860.58 COPIER LEASES 151458 MOYASAR T.YAHYA $588.40 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT TOTAL CALIMS PAID OO117/96 $2.476.270.54 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/12196 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/17195 POSTING DATE 04/17/95 SUMMARY AMOUNT #1 OPER FUND $894.00 02 OPER FUND $2.G07.16 03 OPER FUND $2,451.60 #3 CAP FAC FUND $7,090.00 fly OPER FUND $177.00 A6 OPER FUND $48.00 06 CAP FAC FUND $24,067.00 W7 OPER FUND $442.15 #7 CAP FAC FUND 5440.65 A11 OPER FUND $76.60 #11 CAP FAC FUND $5,020.80 p566 OPER FUND $28.59 0566 CAP FAC FUND $243.253.47 JT OPER FUND $573.666.89 CORP $1,450,407.02 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $5,043.93 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $161.155.48 $2,476.270.54 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 04R9FJ8 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/01/96 POSTING DATE 0510V96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 151496 ASM PUBLISHING SERVICE $1,597.50 PUBLICATIONS 151497 ATM AA,INC. $4,905.00 LAB SERVICES 151498 ACADEMIC PRESS $21.50 PUBLICATIONS 151499 ADVANCED ENGINE TECH CORP. $15,720.85 ENGINE TESTING J-19 151500 AMERIDATA $1.073.89 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 151501 AMERICAN AIR FILTER,INC. $282.78 MECHANICAL PARTS 151502 AMSA $525.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 151503 AMSA $525.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING 151604 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION $1,424.04 SEWER REPAIRS 151505 ANALYSTSINC $2.666.39 MECHANICAL PARTS 151505 ANIXTER-DISTRIBUTION $393.56 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 151507 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $1,191.61 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 151509 AWARDS&TROPHIES $48.49 PLAQUES 151509 BKK LANDFILL $2,935.45 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.1&9-91 151510 BANANA BLUEPRINT $3,129.45 PRINTING M.O.11-07-94 151511 BANK OF AMERICA $20.27 BANKING SERVICES 151512 SHABBIR S.BASMI $275.19 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 151513 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $96.19 BATTERIES 151514 BAUER COMPRESSOR $127.69 COMPRESSOR PARTS 151515 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $20.00 TRUCK WASH TICKETS 151516 BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS $85.27 LAB EQUIPMENT 151517 BERENSON COMMUNICATIONS 5282.09 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 161518 BEV CUSTER $508.58 MAPS 161519 BIO-GRO DIVISION $41,503.91 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO a2&95 1615" BLACK EMP.&EDU.JOURNAL $495.00 PUBLICATION 151521 BRITHINEE ELECTRIC $236.41 ELECTRIC PARTS 151522 BROOKS INSTRUMENT DIV. $23692 INSTRUMENT 151623 BUDGET JANITORIAL $3,330.00 JANITORIAL SERVICES MO 1-12-94 151524 BUSH&ASSOCIATES,INC. $1,070.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6.8.94 151525 C.L.TECHNOLOGY $720.00 GAS ANALYSIS SERVICES 161626 CS COMPANY $1,762AS PLUMBING SUPPLIES 151527 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH INC. $740.29 LAB SUPPLIES 1615M CALIFORNIA AUTO COLLISION,INC. $338.17 TRUCK BODY REPAIR. 151529 THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CA. $195.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING 151530 CASA $130.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING 151531 CENTURY MICRO PRODUCTS $5,989.83 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 151532 CENTURY SAFETY INST.&SUPPLY $89.77 SAFETY SUPPLIES 151533 COAST&OCEAN $18.00 SUBSCRIPTION 151534 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $300.00 SERVICEAGREEMENT 151535 COLEMANICASKEY ARCHITECTS $42,177.30 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MO 11.1&95 151535 COLOR ARTS INC $2,814.73 PRINTING SERVICES 151537 COLTON EQUIPMENT CO $402.50 CRANE INSPECTION 151538 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $7,542.50 PUMP PARTS 151530 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $3,297.71 ELECTRIC PARTS 151540 CONSOLIDATED PLASTICS CO $180.16 LAB SUPPLIES 151541 CONSOLIDATED REPROGRAPHICS $52.15 PRINTING SERVICES FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 0429196 PAGE2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/01190 POSTING DATE 05/01/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 151542 CONSUMER PIPE $595.33 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 151543 CONTINENTAL EQUIPMENT&SUPPLY $177.61 TOOLS 151544 CONTROL DESIGN SUPPLY $223.17 ELECTRIC PARTS 151546 CONTROL SPECIALISTS INC $205.72 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 151546 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $1.003.23 ENGINE PARTS 151647 COORDINATED EQUIP CO INC $125.00 CRANE CERTIFICATION 151548 COUNTERPART ENTERPRISES $829.59 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 151549 COUNTY CLERK $36.00 ANNEXATION FEE 151550 COUNTY CLERK $35.00 ANNEXATION FEE 151551 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $837.70 ELECTRIC PARTS 151552 JAMESCOWAN 6108.00 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 151553 CALIFORNIA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE $322.40 PUBLICATIONS 151554 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 619,584.00 UNEMPLOYMENT CHARGES 151555 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION E2429 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK FEE 151556 DAPPERTIRE $776.51 TIRES 151557 JAMES DARLINGTON $2,887.50 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 151558 DATASTORM $87.45 SOFTWARE 151659 ALBERT W.DAVIES,INC. $936,404.08 CONSTRUCTION 3-3611 151560 TOM DAWES $347.71 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 151551 DE GUELLE&SONS GLASS CO $64.29 SAFETY GLASS 151562 DELL MARKETING L.P. ST1,008.95 COMPUTERS 151563 DEL MAR ANALYTICAL $1.410.00 SIOSOUDS ANALYSIS 151564 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIF. $57,540.31 DENTAL INSURANCE PLAN M.O.1-12-94 151565 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $1,790.81 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 151566 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $115.00 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 151567 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $562.73 PAINT SUPPLIES 151568 ESP NORTH $823.48 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 151669 ENCHANTER,INC. &3,500.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5-24-95 151570 EXCALIBUR ENTERPRISES $5.279.95 NIGHT VISION VIDEO CAMERA 151571 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $2,696.26 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9.91 151572 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $307,95 AIR FREIGHT 151573 FINE SCIENCE TOOLS INC $90.27 LAB SUPPLIES 151574 FIRST CO&/OR NORTHERN DIST. SISSAI JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 151576 FISONS INSTRUMENTS &24177 SERVICE AGREEMENT 151675 FLEXI-LINER CORP $11.539.44 INSPECTION&REPAIR OF DIGESTER LINING 151577 FLICKINGER CO $998.94 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 151578 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $1.403.56 PHOTO SUPPLIES 151579 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $315.50 PAINT SUPPLIES 151580 FRANCE COMPRESSOR PRODUCT $1.534.33 VALVE GUIDE 151581 FRYS ELECTRONICS $5,801.03 ELECTRONIC COMPUTER SUPPLIES 151582 GASB $76.00 PUBLICATION 151553 CST,INC. $8.871.38 OFFICE SUPPLIES 151564 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $630.76 LUMBER/HARDWARE 151555 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1,211.87 TELEPHONE SERVICES 151586 GIERLICH-MITCHELL,INC. $11,510.93 PUMP PARTS 151587 WAN GRAINGER.INC. 9103.48 COMPRESSOR PARTS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 04129M PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05101/96 POSTING DATE 05/01196 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 151588 GRASBY S.T.I. $1.121.75 ENGINE PARTS 151589 GRASEBY ANDERSEN $1,065.24 LAB SUPPLIES 151590 GRATING PACIFIC,INC $1.940.20 FIBERGLASS GRATING 151591 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $101.47 PRINTING 151592 DOA CONSULTANTS $4,180.00 SURVEYING SERVICES 3.36R 151593 DAVID M GRIFFITH&ASSOC. 53,209.15 LAB MANAGER RECRUITMENT 151594 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $1.024.78 TRUCK PARTS 151595 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $372.12 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 151598 HELPMATES PERSONNEL SERVICES 5603.88 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 161597 HERBS BLACK FOREST BAKERY $389.00 MEETING EXPENSE 151598 HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT $2.083.33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN. 151599 HOLMES&NARVER,INC. $22,384.29 ENGINEERING SERVICES Pi44 151500 HOME DEPOT $152.34 SMALL HARDWARE 151601 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $317.51 PAINT SUPPLIES 151602 IDEXX $132.63 LAB SUPPLIES 151603 IPCO SAFETY S1,904.92 SAFETY SUPPLIES 151604 IMAGING PLUS $04.09 OFFICE SUPPLIES 151605 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. $600.00 TRUCK PARTS 151606 INORGANIC VENTURES $239.87 LAB SUPPLIES 151607 INTEGRATED URBAN FORESTRY $450.00 FIELD INSPECTION&ANALYSIS 151608 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $1,094.85 BATTERIES 151609 IRVINE PHOTO GRAPHICS $143.26 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 151610 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $4.90 WATER USE 151611 JAMISON ENGINEERING $2.477.14 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 151812 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $618.73 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 15UH3 JAYS CATERING $903.66 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE 151614 JETFORM CORP. $305.00 PUBLICATIONS 151615 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $311.43 ELECTRIC PARTS 151816 JONES HALL HILL&WHITE $0.707.76 BOND COUNSEL SERVICES MOOI-24-96 151617 KALLEENS COMPUTER PRODUCTS $1,799.07 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 151618 KEENAN SUPPLY $895.61 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 151619 KING BEARING,INC. $1,782.58 MACHINE SUPPLIES 151620 KIRWAN COMPANY $640.80 MISCELLANEOUS HARDWARE 151621 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $2,965.64 TOOLS 151522 LAMOTTE COMPANY $76.93 SULFIDETESTKIT 151623 LAIDLAW ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES $190.00 WASTE DISPOSAL 151624 LASHER DODGE $13.533.69 PICK-UP TRUCK 151525 LIEBERT CORPORATION $26.883.64 ELECTRIC PARTS 151626 LOCALAGENCY $3.900.00 ANNEXATION FEE 151627 LOCAL AGENCY $950.00 ANNEXATION FEE 151628 CITY OF LOS ANGELES $1.60 CONNECTION FEE 151629 LUCCI'S $124.00 MEETING EXPENSE 151630 MPS $64.35 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 151631 MACOMCO $928.20 SERVICE AGREEMENT 151632 MSA $600.08 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 1511633 MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY CORP. $451.26 MISCELLANEOUS HARDWARE FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 04/29M6 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05101/96 POSTING DATE 05M1/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 151634 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS,INC. $3.260.95 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 151635 DENISE MARTINEZ $125.38 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 151636 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $71.35 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 151637 MELLON TRUST $20,139.17 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 151638 MICRO MOTION $856.71 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 151639 MICROFLEX MEDICAL CORP $365.00 SAFETY SUPPLIES IS1640 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3.182.75 UNIFORM RENTALS 161641 NAGDCA $300.00 ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP 151642 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES $1,062.50 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 161643 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $915.01 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 151644 NEUTRON $1,846.79 ANIONIC POLYMER M.O.8-10,94 151646 NICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY $9.557.07 LUBRICANTSIDIESEL FUEL 151646 NORCAL CONTROLS,INC. $306.43 INSTRUMENT PARTS 161647 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $1.050.08 OFFICE SUPPLIES 151648 OMNI WESTERN INC $256.86 TOOLS 151549 ROBERT J OOTEN $762.61 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 151660 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE S4,539.06 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 151651 ORANGE COURIER $141.15 COURIER SERVICES 151652 ORANGE VALVE 8 FITTING CO. $746.21 FITTINGS 151653 OXYGEN SERVICE $2,040.93 SPECIALTY GASES 151664 COUNTY OF ORANGE $270.00 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE 151655 PSSI $7,097.85 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION 151656 PACIFIC INVESTMENT MOMT CO $149,644.00 INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT SERVICES 151657 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $395.00 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 151658 PACIFIC PARTS $139.17 INSTRUMENT PARTS 151659 PACIFIC BELL $1,172.44 TELEPHONE SERVICES 151660 PADRE JANITORIAL SUPPLY $293.51 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 151661 PARAGON CABLE $36.78 CABLE SERVICES 151662 PARTS UNLIMITED $988.66 TRUCK PARTS 151663 PASCAL B LUDWIG $106.796.00 CONSTRUCTION P2413A 1516" PEERLESS WIPING MATERIALS $721.93 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 161665 PERMA SEAL $182.91 LURE OIL 151666 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $745.38 REIMS.PETTY CASH,TRAINING 8 TRAVEL 151667 WILLIAM PIERCE $572.80 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 151668 POLYMETRICS,INC. $1,262.75 IAO SUPPLIES 151669 POWER SYSTEMS $147.88 MECHANICAL PARTS 151670 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $88.00 ICE FOR SAMPLES 151671 PUMP ENGINEERING $1.000.03 PUMP PARTS 151672 PUMPING SOLUTIONS INC $564.40 PUMP PARTS 161673 PUTZMEISTER,INC. $505.56 PUMP PARTS 151674 OUICKSTART TECHNOLOGIES $3.750.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 151675 RD SYSTEMS,INC $246.00 CAMERA REPAIR 151876 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $308.85 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS 151677 R 8 R INSTRUMENTS $385.82 ELECTRIC PARTS 151678 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO. $903.91 LAB SUPPLIES 161679 RED WING SHOES $277.29 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST,WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0 Q9/96 PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/01/96 POSTING DATE 05101/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 161680 SOLT DELIVERY $72.00 FREIGHT 151651 RENOLD INC. $741.73 MECHANICAL PARTS 151682 RONAN ENGINEERING CO $142.60 ALARM PANEL RELAY 151683 RYAN-HERCO $30.90 METAL 151684 SAWA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $1,535.38 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 151685 SARTORIUS CORP. $85.00 LAB SUPPLIES 151686 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $167.18 SPECIALTY GASES 161687 SEA COAST DESIGNS $297.19 LAB SUPPLIES 151688 SEAL PRO INC $2.718.35 MECHANICAL PARTS 161689 SEARS ROEBUCK&CO $124.27 TOOLS 151690 SENTIENT SYSTEMS,INC. $2.882.56 FACILITATOR SERVICES 151691 SEWER EQUIP CO OF AMERICA $1.201.48 LEADER HOSE 151692 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $302.70 TOOLS 151693 SHURELUCK SALES $4,188.53 TOOLS0IARDWARE 151694 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $962.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 151695 SMITH-EMERY CO. $162.00 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-13.94 151696 SMITH PIPE&SUPPLY $155.12 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 151697 SNAP ON I SUN CORP $964.43 TOOLS 151698 SO CALIF EDISON CO $27.680.91 POWER 151699 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $8.853.99 NATURAL GAS 151700 SPARLING INSTRUMENT CO.,INC. $250.00 METER 151701 SQUARED/CRISP AUTOMATION SYSTEMS $2.834.00 ELECTRICAL REPAIR 151702 STANDARD SUPP&EQUIP CO $37.03 MECHANICAL PARTS 151703 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION $250.00 ANNEXATION FEE 151704 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION $250.00 ANNEXATION FEE 151705 KEITH D STOLZENBACH $1.650.00 CONSULTING SERVICES /51706 SUMMIT STEEL $958.98 METAL 151701 SUNSETFORD $346.01 TRUCK PARTS 151700 SUPELCO,INC. $148.65 LAB SUPPLIES 151709 SUPER CHEM CORP. $2.238.41 CHEMICALS 161710 SUPER POWER PRODUCTS $517.20 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 151711 SUPREX CORP. $2,500.00 RENTALAGREEMENT 161712 SYMCAS $7.647.50 CONSULTING SERVICES 151713 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $989.46 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 151714 TENNANT CO $158.03 AUTO PARTS 151715 TEXAS COMMERCE BANK $10,472.47 COP TRUSTEE SERVICES 151716 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $597.00 MECHANICAL PARTS 151717 TONER SYSTEM INTERNATIONAL $1.290.85 PRINTER SUPPLIES 151710 TRAFFIC CONTROL ENGINEERING $1,400.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS 151719 TRENCH SHORING COMPANY $17,509.38 STEEL PLATES 151720 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $81.64 TRUCK PARTS 151721 JG TUCKER&SON,INC. $1.630.70 INSTRUMENT PARTS 151722 U.S.AUTO GLASS CENTERS $200.82 TRUCK PARTS 151723 UNISOURCES/OR BUTLER PAPER $96.33 OFFICE SUPPLIES 151724 DATAVAULT I US SAFE DEPOSIT CO $94.00 BACK-UP TAPE STORAGE 151725 VWR SCIENTIFIC $5,379.53 LAB SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 04/29/96 PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/01/96 POSTING DATE 05/01/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 151728 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $832.16 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 151727 VALVATE ASSOCIATES $491.77 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 151728 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS $2.050.40 FREIGHT 151729 VERTEX TECHNOLOGIES,INC. $1.743.07 FIBER OPTICS 151730 VERTEX SYSTEMS $2,507.50 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT 151731 VORTEX INDUSTRIES $850.00 BUILDING REPAIRS 151732 WACKENHUT CORP. $6.779.36 CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS 151733 WAL-CON CONSTRUCTION CO. $/46,304.79 CONSTRUCTION P243-1 151734 WAXIE $641.00 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 161736 WEF $325.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING 151736 WEST COAST ANALYTICAL SRV $1.950.00 BIOSOLIDS ANALYSIS 161737 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $27,168.81 CAUSTIC SODA NO 8.23.95 151738 WESTIN SANTA CLARA $240.90 MANAGEMENT TRAINING-LODGING 151739 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $262.53 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 161740 WESCO $350.19 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 161741 CITY OF WESTMINSTER $256.25 SURFACE GRADING 151742 ROURKE.WOODRUFF 8 SPRADLIN $87.164.62 LEGAL SERVICES MO 7.28-95 VH743 GARY YOUNG(STATEWIDE INSTIJ $990.00 INSTALL BIOLOGICAL HOODS IN LAB 151744 ZYMARK CORP. $115.15 LAB EQUIPMENT TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 05101NO $2.150.367.83 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0429AJ8 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/01/96 POSTING DATE 05101196 SUMMARY AMOUNT 81 OPER FUND $2.526.70 42 OPER FUND $12.876.52 02 CAP PAC FUND $12,878.49 A3 OPER FUND $18.488.56 83 CAP FAC FUND $944.807.34 85 OPER FUND $5,550.48 *6 OPER FUND $808.29 86 CAP FAC FUND $380.72 $7 OPER FUND $9,330.91 87 CAP FAC FUND $450.00 $11 OPER FUND $8,360.02 011 CAP FAC FUND $173.98 013 OPER FUND $35.61 914 OPER FUND $354.43 #14 CAP FAC FUND $122.60 85&8 CAP FAC FUND $147.228.63 A6&7 OPER FUND $213.52 87&14 OPER FUND $16.71 JT OPER FUND $305,327.31 CORP $328.632.67 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $71,800.61 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $279,915.93 $2.150.357.83 FUND NO 9109 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE-VARIOUS PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID-MISCELLANEOUS HANDWRITE WARRANTS WARRANT DATE WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 0411 M6 151195 ASCE TUL CONFERENCE $375.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING 04/11/96 151196 ALBARKER $15,640.13 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 04111M 151197 COUNTY CLERK $25.00 NOTICE OF EXEMPTION FEE 04111/96 151198 ALEX FISHMAN $4.002.31 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 0411IJ96 161199 PAULINE JOHNSTON AND $6.160.00 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 04111MB 15120D JOEL MANCHESTER,M.D. $10.068.00 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 04/11/96 151201 HELENE WINOGURA $7.100.93 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 04/1528 151459 APWA $65.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 04/15/96 151460 COUNTY CLERK $38.00 NOTICE OF EXEMPTION FEE 04/15/96 151461 COUNTY CLERK $38.00 NOTICE OF EXEMPTION FEE ON15/98 151462 UPPER NEWPORT BAY $20.00 EARTH DAY FEE 04/19196 151483 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $1,200.00 APPEAL FEE 0419/98 151464 KEYE PRODUCTIVITY CENTER $139.00 TECHNICALTRAINING 04H9/96 151465 WATERUSE MEMBERSHIP $100.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING 0424/96 151486 DONNA ANDERSON $21.95 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 04124196 151487 HARRY CROMWELL $19,125.00 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 0424196 151488 EMERGENCY SERVICE RESTORATION $2,144.30 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 0424/96 151469 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT $495.00 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 0424/96 151490 NEWPORT HARBOR LOCKSMITH $65.0D NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 04/24/96 151491 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS INC $129.612.98 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 3.29-95 0424196 151492 WATERUSE ASSOCIATION $150.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING 0426196 151493. JOHN C.COX,JR. $200.45 CASA WORKSHOP 0426/96 151494 SAL SAPIEN $200.45 CASA WORKSHOP 0426/96 151495 PEER SWAN $200.45 CASA WORKSHOP 05101m 151745 NICHOLAS ARHONTES $543.55 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 05/01/96 151746 THE BALBOA BAY CLUB $3,376.65 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 05/01/96 151747 GASKET ENGINEERING $90.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 05/01/96 151748 INNOVATION GROUP WEST $420.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING O5103/96 151749 THEN BALBOA BAY CLUB $965A0 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM O5/03/95 151750 EMERCON RESTORATION $5.967.66 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 05/03/96 151751 MARTIN&MILDRED LITKE $4.391.42 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 05/03/96 151752 WORLD RESTORATION $2,469.44 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 05/09/98 151778 AMSA $526.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 05/09/98 161779 DONNAANDERSON $67.50 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 05/09/98 151780 DE GUELLE&SONS GLASS CO $560.00 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 05/09/95 151701 EMERSON RESTORATION $437.25 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM O5109/96 151782 PAULINE JOHNSTON AND $3.619.19 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 05/09/96 151783 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS INC $128,563.20 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO3-M95 TOTAL CLAIMS PAID $350.003.99 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE-VARIOUS PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANMATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID-MISCELLANEOUS HANDWRITE WARRANTS SUMMARY AMOUNT 42 CAP FAC FUND $423.00 M3 OPER FUND $90.00 N5 OPER FUND $538.13 JT OPER FUND $251,397.49 CORF $4,333.46 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $93,221.91 $350,003.99 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING MAY 22, 1996 District No. 7 Agenda Item (10): Consideration of Resolution No. 96-53-7 approving agreement with the County of Orange providing for the adjustment of manholes on District sewers in conjunction with the County's 1995-96 street resurfacing program in unincorporated County areas within District No. 7, and providing for payment of the actual cost of the manhole adjustment plus 10% for inspection and administrative costs for approximately 70 manholes, at a per-manhole unit cost not to exceed $220.00 nor be less than $155.00 per manhole; and authorizing payment of required deposit of $13,650.00 for said work. Summary The Orange County Environmental Management Agency (OCEMA) is currently undertaking an asphalt overlay program through 1996. This project will consist primarily of resurfacing existing streets which are in OCEMA's area of responsibility. CSD 7 owns and maintains sewer systems in the area that requires resurfacing, and must pay for the adjustment of the manholes. However, OCEMA has offered to include the coordination and adjustment of the District's manholes in their contract. The project includes 70 manholes at a maximum cost of$220.00 each, and depending on bids, a minimum cost of$155.00. (The maximum and minimum provide protection to both agencies against unbalanced bids). The deposit required is $13,650.00. Similar yearly agreements in the past have been very successful. Staff Recommendation L ests authorization to execute an agreement with the Orange County ental Management Agency for the adjustment of CSD Ts manholes at a cost of$220.00 each for a total amount not to exceed $15,400.00. SW G96WAV96\5.10 r County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California P.O. Box 8127. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 9272MI27 Telephone: (714)962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE Wednesday, April 24, 1996 - 5:30 p.m. A meeting of the Steering Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held Wednesday, April 24, 1996, at 5:30 p.m., at the Districts' Administrative office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: STEERING COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Present: John C. Cox, Jr., Joint Chair Peer A. Swan, Vice Joint Chair STAFF PRESENT: George Brown, Chair, FAHR Blake P. Anderson, Assistant General Manager John J. Collins, Chair, PDC Judith A. Wilson, Assistant General Manager Pat McGuigan, Chair, OMTS Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary Roger Stanton, Vice Chair, FAHR Absent: None (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. (4) APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the March 27, 1996 Steering Committee meeting were approved as drafted. p Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting Page 2 April 24, 1996 (5) REPORTS OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR, GENERAL MANAGER AND GENERAL COUNSEL (a) Report of Committee Chair. There was no report by the Committee Chairman. (b) Report of General Manager. In the absence of the General Manager, Assistant General Manager— Administration Judy Wilson reported on proposed changes to the agenda process. A motion was made, seconded and passed to approve the recommendation of the Board Secretary to only include summary reports on action items unanimously approved by Committees unless directed otherwise by the Committee Chair. The Committee agreed to try the change for 90 days with the understanding that at the bottom of the agenda item a summary sentence will be included that states, "If copies of the staff report or further information is requested, contact ° The lead staff person will contact the Committee Chair after the Committee meeting to see if there are any staff reports they would like sent out in full. (c) Report of General Counsel. General Counsel Tom Woodruff reported that the Pringle Bill was heard and is out of Committee. However, it is anticipated that the bill will not go forward in its present form. There appears to be a commitment from the speaker that there are problems with the current language, and a cooperative effort would be undertaken to refine it. This bill only applies to Orange County and there are three specific targets: Garden Grove Sanitary District, the 18 south county water and sewer agencies, and IRWD because of their"excess monies." (6) DISCUSSION ITEMS (a) Update on Activities re Landfill Acquisition. Blake Anderson reported that there are several clean-up items that need to be finalized. The Board of Supervisors are in receipt of our letter asking for our$100,000 back. Staff is considering "selling" the County the information we discovered on the closed landfill sites for about $100,000. Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting Page 3 April 24, 1996 Some consultant fees are still outstanding. Staff has been negotiating with Price Waterhouse and Saybrook, which resulted in a 14% reduction from each of their original billings. A report will be made to the May FAHR Committee. The total cost for this task is approximately $400,000, including the $100,000 deposit. (b) Status Report on '96-97 Budget Judy Wilson reported on the progress of the '96-97 budget. The anticipated dollars per million gallons ($/mg)for next year is at $587 representing a budget of$51.4 million, a 6% decrease from lhe '95-96 adopted budget of $58.1 million and $620/mg. The authorized position count is down by 33 and could be lower after the Information Technology audit. This information will be presented to the FAHR Committee in May and the other Committees in June. The CORF budget is at $45 million, of which 85% is for continuing projects. Most other projects are on hold, waiting on the completion of the new Strategic Plan. This budget will be presented to all Committees in May. Director Swan expressed concern that the comparison of the '96-97 budget should be to the actual '95-96 expenditures rather than the budgeted amounts. He also indicated that we know that the staffing numbers are too high, yet additional positions are being requested. Directors Cox, Swan and Brown all indicated that we should try to develop a budget that actually"targets" for where we want to be, rather than having a target that is the budget we propose. Director Swan discussed "real world pain," as experienced at his firm. He said that reductions through attrition are not enough. Judy indicated that the General Manager has said that he is not in favor of layoffs; that there needs to time allowed to implement some of the major programs and complete four major management audits to determine efficiencies. Director McGuigan said that we need to get the new structure in place before making any major reductions. Blake Anderson addressed the discussions we have had with EMA and the strategies we hope to put in place. It will take us time to put automation in place prior to our being able to reduce staff. Staff is already working on some aspect of EMA's recommendations, including the combination of Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting Page 4 April24, 1996 several divisions of the Operations and Maintenance Departments so that cross-training and work force flexibility can begin to be utilized. Judy indicated that all trends are downward and that the General Manager is committed to making this happen, but it would take about 3 to 5 years. She will take the Committee's message back to staff. (c) Report on County of Orange Plan of Adjustment. Blake Anderson reported that the final agreement which was previously approved has defined our participation in the Plan of Adjustment. An analysis of the deal with Option B members was faxed to all directors. The OCIP met and unanimously agreed to not oppose the settlement between the County and Option Bs. The County will file the Plan of Adjustment with the Bankruptcy Court in May and it should be approved. This opens the way for the County to secure bonds in June. It is anticipated that the County will be out of bankruptcy by the end of June. The discovery on the Merrill Lynch case continues to go forward. Depositions will probably extend well into 1997. There is no longer recourse against the County for either Option A or B participants. (d) Review of Committee Action Items for May Meetings. There will be a couple more items added to the PDC Committee agenda for May. (7) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. (8) OTHER BUSINESS There was no other business discussed. Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting Page 5 April 24, 1996 (9) MATTERS TO BE REPORTED AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING The changes to the Joint Boards agenda will be reviewed at the July Steering Committee meeting. (10) MATTERS ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT There were no matters for a future agenda. (11) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next meeting has been scheduled for May 22, 1996 at 5:30 p.m. (12) ADJOURNMENT The Steering Committee adjourned at approximately 6:25 p.m. Submitted by: e n Tappan, Ste($incf Committee Secretary J MGP..`(.GMISIRLOMM188NP 20M MIN County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California P.O.Box 8127. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92728.8127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY, MAY 1. 1996 -5:30 p.m. A regular meeting of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13, and 14 of Orange County, California was held on May 1, 1996, at the Districts'Administrative Office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was taken and a quorum declared present, as follows: Committee Directors Present: Staff Present: Pat McGuigan, Chair Don McIntyre, General Manager Victor Leipzig, Vice Chair Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager John C. Cox Jr., Joint Chair Judy Wilson, Assistant General Manager Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair Ed Hodges, Director of General Services Administration Barry Denes David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Norman Z. Eckenrode Bob Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance James M. Ferryman Gary Streed, Director of Finance Mark Murphy Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications Chris Norby Nancy Wheatley, Director of Technical Services Tom Dawes, Engineer Planning Manager Absent Mike Moore, Principal Environmental Specialist Sam Mowbray, Lab Manager Sal Sapien Angela Holden, Committee Secretary Others Present: Mary Clyburn Lee, John Carollo Engineers Minutes of Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Meeting Page 2 May 1, 1996 (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments received. (4) REPORTS OF COMMITTEE CHAIR, GENERAL MANAGER.ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER. DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE, DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES,AND GENERAL COUNEL (a) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Director Pat McGuigan introduced Angie Holden as the new Committee Secretary and expressed appreciation of the work done by Clarice Marcin. (b) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER We had a meeting with House Foods this morning discussing Excess Capacity Charges. We believe we may be able to strike a deal with them that would encourage on-site treatment using part of their ECC to pay for the facility. This would be a pilot project and our experience would contribute to the Strategic Plan Study. Nancy Wheatley will discuss further. (e) REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER No report was given by either AGM. (d) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS Bob Ooten brought to the Committee's attention that the ENVEST Feasibility Study Energy Conservation Report from So Ca Edison should be brought for review next month. This is the energy conservation measures. The Operations and Maintenance Departments are now combined under Bob Ooten. (e) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF MAINTENANCE Ed Hodges announced that this is the last meeting he will be spear-heading the OMTS Committee since he now will be working in the General Services Administration. He is now passing the baton to Nancy Wheatley. Ed expressed his pleasure in working on the OMTS Committee and will be bringing items to this committee in the future. Two other items were addressed: 1. Hopefully, next month he will be bringing an agreement with COP Minutes of Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Meeting Page 3 May 1, 1996 Communications regarding placing antennas on a building at Plant No. 2. We are negotiating a fee they will pay us for using our roof. 2. Within the next month or two will be bringing another proposal for additional funds to get some federal, state and local monies to make CNG vehicles available to trucking firms, cities and wastehaulers. We are working out a net zero in cost with national exposure. (f) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES Nancy Wheatley had three items to report on: 1. House Foods-There was a meeting May 1, 1996 with Rick Hertel. We discussed cost associated with BOD into our system. They will spend $100,000 a year just in sewer use charges to pay for solids and BOD,that doesn't include the flow. We discussed with Mr. Hertel ways they could do pretreatment. We did explain to them that their annual capital fee would be no more than the cost calculated using the present method amortized over ten years, but if they wanted to propose a project whereas we would do a pilot program on pretreatment for BOD then if they paid us a sum upfront we would invest that in the pilot program and as partners we would put together a pretreatment program for them. If we receive a favorable response, we will come back to this committee and then to the Board. 2. Bay Bridge Spill -As recorded that was a violation. The notice of an administrative complaint will be filed soon. The amount of penalty against us is reported unofficially to be $50,000. This is a low fine. This is reasonable. We have not seen the complaint and we will report to you on it. As soon as we know when it will be in the Register, we will let you know. Ed Hodges answered questions regarding the liability issue. Other liabilities would not affect our liability. Director Pat McGuigan requests that the liability issue be put on the agenda calendar in the future. 3. Orange County Fair-Technical Services is taking responsibility for organizing the booth with the assistance of the Communications Division. (9) REPORT FROM GENERAL COUNSEL No report was given. (6) APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF APRIL 3. 1996 MEETING Correction to Item#9, Director Norman Z. Eckenrode drew the Committee's attention to the letter from a citizen in Newport Beach regarding flow of treated effluent from IRWD into the Newport Bay. The rest of the minutes of the April 3, 1996 Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Meeting were moved, seconded and carried as approved as written. Minutes of Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Meeting Page 4 May 1, 1996 - (6) STATE OF THE DEPARTMENTS Nancy J. Wheatley gave a presentation on the Technical Services Department discussing the reorganization of divisions, department goals, staffing (past and proposed), gallonage charge and budget. She also gave a brief overview of each division. Copies of the slides were provided as handouts. (7) NEW BUSINESS PDC96-17: Consideration of motion to Recommend Approval of the Requested Capital Outlay Revolving Fund for Fiscal Year 1996-97. Dave Ludwin and Gary Streed gave a presentation discussing current budget, proposed budget, status of projects that are ongoing, assessed the needs of Operations and Maintenance and the Master Plan with consideration of the current Flows, current needs and plans. The requested CORF budget totals $44,895,000, an increase of 34%from last year's request of$33,530,000. Eighty-five percent of the requested budget is for construction, seven percent for design and eight percent for planning and research. The categories of requested funds include: improved treatment (48%), rehabilitation (26%), support facilities and systems (21%) and added capacity (5%). Each project and budget cost was discussed. Handouts were provided. Last year's prioritized list of projects was considered and is reflected in this budget. (8) OLD BUSINESS OMTS96-021: Quarterly Report on the Districts' Occupational Injury and Near-Miss Accident Rates. Report was accepted without discussion. OMTS95-033b: Consideration of one-year extension of Environmental Monitoring Professional Services Contract for Districts' 120- inch Ocean Outfall, Specification No. P-156R, to Science Applications International Corporation to February 28, 1998 for an additional cost not to exceed $1,474,098. Nancy gave the presentation. Discussion and explanation followed regarding how the contract year is done. Sampling is done from July to July, then a writing-up and statistical analysis period follows. There is an overlap. Moved, seconded and carried to approve staffs recommendation. Minutes of Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Meeting Page 5 May 1, 1996 OMTS95-041d: Consideration of motion to authorize staff to enter into a Three-party Billing Agreement with the Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas) for the billing process of the Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) Station. Ed Hodges gave the presentation. This is the last (fourth installment) piece before we start generating income. We have worked out an agreement that we will receive $.20 per transaction. Moved, seconded and carried to approve staffs recommendation. OMTS95-020: Closing report on the implementation of the 38 recommendations made as part of the Ernst and Young audit of the Operations and Maintenance Departments. Bob Ooten gave the presentation. After discussion, it was decided that staff will bring to the June OMITS Committee meeting a synapsis on all the items. (9) NEW BUSINESS OMTS96-009: EMA Competitiveness Assessment Report Summary of Operations and Maintenance Department. Bob Ooten gave the presentation. Recommendations are being considered and incorporated. We are looking at ourselves competitively with private organization rather than public agencies. These are substantial changes. Workplans will be guided by this. A handout of the slide presentation was provided. OMTS96-010: Overview of the new General Services Administration Department(GSA). Ed Hodges gave a brief presentation of the new department. There was discussion of automation and revenues. (10) CLOSED SESSION The Chair declared there were no items for closed session. (11) OTHER BUSINESS, IF ANY Reminder of Saturday, May 4, Board Strategic Planning Workshop. Minutes of Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Meeting Page 6 May 1, 1996 (12) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING - RE: OMTS95-020 above: Staff will bring to the June OMTS Committee meeting a synopsis on all the items. - Bay Bridge Spill Liability Issue: Status to be discussed at a later date. (13) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT (14) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING DATES AND ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AT THOSE MEETINGS. (15) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:50 p.m. Angel olden Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Secretary J:\WPW WNGEM0WSNIA JN=S589 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING MAY 22, 1996 Agenda Item (13) (C): OMTS95-033b Consideration of one-year extension of Environmental Monitoring Professional Services Contract for Districts' 120-inch Ocean Outfall,Specification No. P-156R, to Science Applications International Corporation to February 28, 1998 for an additional cost not to exceed $1,474,098. Summary The Ocean Monitoring Program (OMP) associated with the 301(h)-modified NPDES permit has been conducted through consultant contracts since its inception in 1985. In June 1994, Amendment 11 to Science Applications International Corporation's (SAIC) 1985 ocean monitoring services contract (Specification No. S-032) was approved, extending the performance period to February 1996. Concurrent with the approval of this extension, the Boards of Directors directed staff to seek competitive proposals for the Year 11 contracted ocean monitoring work. This process was initiated in November 1994, and staff received two responses to the request for proposals. Upon staff recommendation and the Boards' approval, SAIC was awarded a new contract for an amount not to exceed $1,486,463 (Specification No. P-156R). Included in this approval was the option of up to two additional one-year contract extensions based upon acceptable completion of work by SAIC and the status of issuance of a new NPDES permit. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends exercising the option of the first one-year extension to SAIC's Environmental Monitoring Professional Services Contract for the Districts' 120-inch Ocean Outfall (Specification No. P-156R), extending the performance period to February 28, 1998, for an additional amount not to exceed $1,474,098. OMTS Committee Recommendation The OMTS Committee concurs with the recommendation of staff. GR:mm J:\W P\3550\OMTS\95-03313.BRD h May 1, 1996 STAFF REPORT OMTS95-033b: Consideration of one-year extension of Environmental Monitoring Professional Services Contract for Districts' 120-inch Ocean Outfall, Specification No. P456R, to Science Applications International Corporation to February 28, 1998 for an additional cost not to exceed $1,474,098. Background In June 1994, upon the approval of Amendment 11 of Science Applications International Corporation's (SAIC) 1985 contract for Year 10 ocean monitoring services, the Boards of Directors directed staff to seek competitive proposals for Year 11 (July 1995 to February 1997) of the program. This process was initiated in November 1994 and staff received two responses to our request for proposals. Upon evaluation and approval of the Boards, SAIC was awarded a contract for an amount not to exceed $1,486,463 with an option for up to two additional one-year renewals based upon acceptable completion and the status of issuance of a new NPDES permit. Year 11 Ocean Monitoring Program SAIC and its subcontractors have provided excellent service for the Year 11 ocean monitoring program. To date, they have met all completion goals for the samples collected from July 1995 to April 1996. SAIC has been proactive in responding to problems that arose during Year 11. One example is the loss of the commercial chemistry laboratory (due to bankruptcy) half way through sampling period. SAIC was able to identify and obtain a qualified laboratory that could run the specialized 301(h) chemistry methodologies within a matter of weeks. In addition, SAIC has shown a continued ability to respond to and accommodate Districts' needs during this contract period. For example, SAIC and its primary subcontractor, MEC Analytical Systems, have allowed Districts' personnel to obtain additional field samples during the normal sampling events. In short, SAIC continues to provide competent ocean monitoring services to the Districts. CSOOC 0 P.O. Box 8127 0 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 • (714)962-2411 OMTS95-033b Page 2 of 3 May 1, 1996 Year 12 Contract Staff has successfully worked with SAIC to provide a contract price that represents a zero increase from the previous contract period. Reductions in the scope of work has resulted in a minor decrease of$12,356. Table 1 compares Year 12's proposed costs with Year 11's actual costs. Table 1. Comparison between SAIC Year 12 proposed costs and Year 11 actual costs, by program element. Program Element Year11 Year 12 Change Offshore Water Quality $ 15,676 $ 15,747 $ 71 Benthic Monitoring $ 823,508 $ 803,206 $ (20,302) Trawl Monitoring $ 153,258 $ 160,447 $ 7,189 Rig Fish Monitoring $ 62.201 $ 64,039 $ 1,838 Data Summary and Interpretation $ 295,774 $ 318,959 U23,",5185 Liaison and Program Review Meetings $ 70,760 $ 78,277 Additional Services $ 65,286 $ 33,423 Total $ 1,486,463 $ 1,474,098 Contractual Flexibility The Districts is still waiting for EPA's decision on the renewal of our 301(h) waiver. However, we are required to carry out the monitoring program as contained in the existing NPDES Permit. Staff is continuing to evaluate better means of carrying out the monitoring program. One result is the addition of flexibility in SAIC's contract language that: (1) recognizes a new monitoring program may be required during the contract period, and (2) that the Districts may, at its discretion, take on portions of the monitoring program. In the first case, the Districts would negotiate with SAIC to alter the contractual OMTS95-033b Page 3 of 3 May 1, 1996 scope-of-work within the existing contract price, renegotiate a new price and/or re-bid the new program. In the second case, although this is a fixed-price contract, any contractual cost savings realized by the Districts carrying out certain program elements would be deducted from the original contract amount. Staff Recommendation The requirement to continue with our existing NPDES permit monitoring program, and the fact that SAIC has provided excellent service leads staff to decide that it is in the best interests of the Districts to extend SAIC's contract. Staff recommends extending the Environmental Monitoring Professional Services Contract for the Districts' 120-inch Ocean Outfall (Specification No. P-156R) to SAIC for a one-year period to February 28, 1998, for an additional amount not to exceed $1,474,098. GR m= JAW P13550\OMTS%95-033B.BRD COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA May 7, 1996 phone: (714)9522411 Boards of Directors meting addreae: County Sanitation Districts of Orange County ha�ta,rV.11 ylCA 10844 Ellis Avenue 92726.8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708-7081 street address: FoBA4enI�V w c4 SUBJECT: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Amendment No. 1 to 92708-7018 Agreement with Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC)for the Ocean Monitoring Program Contract Services for Districts' 120-inch Ocean Outfall, Specification No. P-156R Member Agencies • In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional cwa, engineering and architectural services, the Operations, Maintenance and Anaheim Technical Services Committee (OMTS) has negotiated the following fee Brad with Science Applications International Corporation to perform services for Buena PerkCydr. the Ocean Monitoring Program Contract Services for Districts' 120-inch Pourneon Valley Ocean Outfall, Specification No. P-156R in conformance with the Fullerton Hunt;ngmn Beach requirements of the United Stales Environmental Protection Agency. This Irwou amendment modifies the original contract period (July 1, 1995 to February La Habra La Palma 28 1997) and extends it to February 28, 1998. As a part of this extension Las Alamitos SAIC will prepare equipment, conduct field surveys, Perform data analysis Newport Beach Orange and interpretations, report results and recommendations as summarized in Phuohnud Table 1 for a net additional amount not to exceed $1,474,098 (Table 2). Santa Ana Beat Beath Total compensation for this package will not exceed $2,960.561. Stanton Co" vlta Par* Table 1. Task Summary for SAIC Ocean Monitoring Contract (Amendment No. 1) Yorbe Linde County of Orange Task Date(s) aanhary Districts Year 11 and 12 Meetings/Liaison (Task F) July 1995 to January 1998 Cadre Mese Carden Bore Report Task E 1996 Year 12 QAPP Re M;ewev oty P ( ) July Water District. Year 12 Field Sampling (Tasks A-D and G) July 1996 to April 1997 Imne Ranch Year 12 Analytical Work (Task A-D and G) July 1996 to June 1997 Year 11 Data Analysis, Interpretation and July 1996 to January 1997 Report Writing Task E A Public Wastewater and Environmental Managemont Agency Committed to Pretecnng the Enwronment Since 1954 r Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Page 2 of 3 May 7, 1996 Table 1 (continued). Task Summary for SAIC Ocean Monitoring Contract (Amendment No. 1) Task Date(s) Year 11 QA Report (Task E) October 1996 Year 11 Annual Report (Task E) January 1997 Year 12 Data Analysis, Interpretation and July 1997 to January 1998 Report Writing (Task E) Year 12 QA Report (Task E) October 1997 Year 12 Annual Report Task E January 1998 Table 2. Cost Summary for SAIC Ocean Monitoring Contract (Amendment No. 1) Basic Program Tasks (Labor& Other Direct Costs for Tasks A-F) $1,343,604 Profit (Basic Program Tasks A-F) $97,071 Quality Assurance/Quality Control Analysis (Task G) $31,234 Profit (Quality Assurance/Quality Control Analysis Task G) $2,189 Amendment No. 1 Amount $1,474,098 Original Contract Amount $1,486,463 Total Contract Cost $2,960,561 Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Page 3 of 3 May 7, 1996 The OMTS Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that the said fee will not result in excessive profits for the contractor. /s/Director McGuigan /s/Director Leipzig Director McGuigan, Chair Director Leipzig, Vice Chair OMTS Committee OMTS Committee /s/Nancy J. Wheatley Nancy J. Wheatley Director of Technical Services OMTS Committee NJW:GR:mcm JAW M550W MTSW501901TR y JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING MAY 22, 1996 Agenda Item (13)(d): OMTS95-041d consideration of motion to approving a Billing Agreement with Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas) as Districts' agent to facilitate billing for amounts due to Districts for compressed natural gas dispensed from Districts' refueling station, at a cost of$.20 per transaction, cancelable upon ten days written notice. Summary Attached for your guidance and information is a copy of the proposed Three-party billing agreement between the Districts and SoCalGas. When fully executed, it will allow SoCalGas to bill anyone who uses our compressed natural gas facility at a cost of$0.20 per transaction. As part of the agreement, SoCalGas will pay all commodity costs, transportation costs and taxes and issue a net check to the Districts on a regular basis. This agreement gives us the ability to charge different rates to different customers as we see fit. (Please see attached Agreement.) Budoetary Impact None. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the Billing Agreement with SoCalGas. OMTS Committee Recommendation The OMTS Committee recommends approval of the Billing Agreement with SoCalGas. For further information contact Ed Hodges (714) 962-2411, ext. 3005. J:=POG WWG9 AV965.130 BILLING AGREEMENT This BILLING AGREEIv=("Agreement") is entered into as of the_day of 1996 by and between Couny Sanitation Districts of Orange County("CSDOC"), a public agency as owner/operator of one or more natural gas vehicle refueling stations accessible to the general public ("NGV Station(s)") and Southern California Gas Company, a California corporation("SoCalGas"), as CSDOC's agent,to facilitate billing for amounts due to CSDOC for compressed natural gas dispensed from the NGV Station. CSDOC and SOCaIGas agree: I. Aeencv. During the term of this Agreement CSDOC designates SoCa1Gas as its non-exclusive agent to bill and receive payment for natural gas dispensed from the NGV Station(s). SoCalGas shall,in good faith, endeavor(i)to bill CSDOC's customers for gas purchased by them from the NGV Station(s) using SoCalGas' sponsored fueling cud,together with certain taxes due thereon as specified in paragraph 4; (u)to credit or remit all funds so received, less authorized deductions,to CSDOC in accordance with paragraph 4; (iu)to make payment to the appropriate federal and state taxing agencies of the taxes so collected on CSDOC's behalf and(iv)to conduct such further billing and collection efforts as SoCalGas and CSDOC shall mutually agree upon. 2. Prices. CSDOC shall be solely responsible for determining the prices charged from time to time for compressed natural gas dispensed from the NGV Station(s),and for determining the amounts to be collected for all taxes, surcharges and other associated fees payable by its customers. CSDOC may change such charges as of the first of any month,but no more frequently than monthly. CSDOC shall notify SOCaIGw of such charges and of modifications therein no later than ten(10) days prior to the beginning of the month in which such price changes are to become effective. 3. Charge. Currently SoCalCas' administrators charge for processing and billing on CSDOC's behalf is $0.20(twenty cents)per transaction. SoCalGas may increase or ti decrease the amount of such processing charge upon ten(10)days written notice to CSDOC, provided that CSDOC may cancel this Agreement with respect to future transactions in accordance with paragraph 5, should the change be unacceptable. As used herein"transaction" means each reading of CSDOC's customer's card for fuel purchases from CSDOC's publicly accessible NGV Station, regardless of the volume purchased. Due to certain limitations in its billing system, SoCalCras' invoice to CSDOC will not provide the details of the administrative fee provided for in paragraph 3,nor the details of the credit from SoCalGas' billings on CSDOC's behalf under this Agreement. At CSDOC's reques4 a transaction summary report from the provider of the billing card system(currently E. I Ward) will be provided by SoCalGas. 4. Payments. 4.1 At the end of each billing period,SoCalGas shall credit CSDOC with charges received and billed on behalf of CSDOC pursuant to this Agreement. Solely as an accommodation to CSDOC, SOCalCras will remit to the appropriate taxing agencies all amounts billed and collected for state use fuel tax and federal vehicle fuel tax on behalf of CSDOC. SOCaIGas is authorized to deduct from its credits to CSDOC, without notice or demand, (n all administrative charges, (u) all amounts due from CSDOC to SOCalGas for gas sold to or transported for CSDOC or other utility services,and(iii)all taxes received by SOCaIGas under this Agreement and paid to taxing authorities on behalf of CSDOC and its customers. Payments received from CSDOC's customers may be applied by SoCalGas (without any requirement to do so)to satisfy obligations in the following order of priority: (a) federal fuel taxes; (b) state fuel use taxes; (c) amounts due from the customer to SoCalGas(including interest and penalties) for natural gas vehicle fuel provided at SoCalCms owned locations; and (d) amounts due from CSDOC to SoCalCm(including interest and penalties)for gas service. 2 d The balance shall be credited to CSDOC. In the event that customer has paid SoCalGas for fuel purchased from other non-utility providers,the amount credited CSDOC shall not exceed its pro-rats share of the amounts so collected. 4.2 For each billing period, SoCalGas is permitted to estimate the credit due CSDOC under this Agreement on the basis of billings to CSDOC's customers. As of the end of each calendar quarter, SoCalGas shall reconcile such estimated credits with the total amounts actually paid by such customers during such quarter and shall famish CSDOC a summary statement showing any additional amounts due to,or from, CSDOC. Over- collections not previously credited to CSDOC shall be deducted from future invoices. Under- collections not previously paid by CSDOC shall be paid by CSDOC upon invoicing. Invoices shall be deemed delivered when properly addressed to the address specified by the party and deposited in the United States Mail,postage prepaid. 4.3 SoCalGas reserves the right to deactivate any end-user's fueling card for non-payment, and to require any end-user to post a deposit to establish or re-establish credit 4.4 All charges and credits are subject to audit and adjustment within three(3) years of the date made. 5. Term. This Agreement may be canceled by either parry, with or without cause, at the end of any month upon written notice delivered by the canceling party to the other no later than ten(10) days prior to the end of the month, to be effective upon the fast day of the following month. Cancellation shall not affect billing and processing for transactions occurring, or other rights or obligations arising under this Agreement prior to the effective date of cancellation. 6. Operations CSDOC shall remain solely responsible for the operations of its NGV Station, including(but not limited to) compliance with all safety, regulatory,tax(other than taxes which SoCalGas actually collects and pays pursuant to paragraph 4.1) and other laws and regulations applicable thereto;meter calibration;service and maintenance of the NGV Station; and maintenance of public liability insurance or self-insurance with coverage adequate 3 to cover the risks associated therewith. Nothing herein shall be construed as creating a partnership,joint venture, co-owner relationship or other form of shared responsibility for the NGV Station or its operation or maintenance. 7. Assignment. CSDOC shall not assign or transfer its interest in,nor any of its rights under this Agreement without SOCaIGas' written consent,not to be unreasonably withheld 8. Notice. Notices provided for under this Agreement may be served electronically,through private courier or by the United States Mail to the address specified by each party beneath its signature,or to such other address as such party shall specify by written notice to the other. Service shall be complete upon actual receipt,or,with respect to delivery by United States Mail, five days after the date the notice is mailed,postage prepaid 9. Remdatory Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Section X.B of General Order 96A issued by the California Public Utilities Commission("CPUC"),this Agreement shall be Sled with the CPUC. To the extent required by General Order 96A,this Agreement shall at all times be subject to such changes or modifications by the CPUC as said Commission may,from time to time, direct in the exercise of its jurisdiction. Except as maybe expressly provided herein, the tariffs and rules of SoCalGas, as approved by the CPUC,shall govern to the extent they are applicable to utility services provided CSDOC by SoCalGas. 10. Miscellaneous. 10.1 Conformity to Law. The interpretation and performance of this Agreement shall be in accordance with the laws of the State of California,and the orders,Hiles and regulations of the CPUC, in effect form time to time. 10.2 Entire Agreement: Amendments. This Agreement contains the complete understanding of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior discussions, agreements and representations(whether oral or written). Except as required to conform with California law and the orders, rules and regulations of the CPUC,no amendment or modification shall be made to this Agreement except by an instrument in writing executed 4 f a by all parties, and no amendment or modification shall be made by course of performance, course of dealing or usage of trade. 10.3 Waiver. No waiver by any party of one or more defaults under this Agreement shall be construed as a waiver of any other default or defaults,whether of a like or different character. 10.4 Limitation of Liability. No party under this Agreement shall be assessed any special punitive, consequential, incidental or indirect damages, whether in contract or tort, for any actions or inactions arising from or related to this Agreement IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first above set forth. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. I OF ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA,for itself and on behalf of County Sanitation District Nos. 2,3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County California By: Chair,Board of Directors By: Secretary,Board of Directors Approved as to Form: Thomas L. Woodruf District Councel By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY, a corporation By: Title: 5 t County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California .' P.O.Box 8127.108"Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE THURSDAY, MAY 2. 1996, at 5:30 p.m. A regular meeting of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13, and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Thursday, May 2, 1996, at the Districts'Administrative Office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was taken and a quorum declared present, as follows: Planning, Design and Construction Committee: Staff Present: Present: Blake P. Anderson, Assistant General Manager John Collins, Chair David Ludwin, Director of Engineering John C. Cox, Jr. Gary Streed, Director of Finance Shirley Dettloff Bob Dolan, Director of Operations Don Griffin Michelle Tuchman, Dir. of Communications Barry Hammond Tom Dawes, Planning Manager Margie Rice Paul Mitchell, Design Manager Sheldon Singer Peer Swan Charles Sylvia Others Present: Absent Mary Lee, Carollo Engineers Walter K. Bowman t Minutes of Planning, Design and , Construction Committee Meeting Page 2 May 2, 1996 (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments received. (4) APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF APRIL 4. 1996 MEETING The minutes of the April 4, 1996 Planning, Design and Construction Committee Meeting were approved as written. (5) REPORTS OF COMMITTEE CHAIR GENERAL MANAGER ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER. DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING AND GENERAL COUNSEL (a) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR No report was given. (b) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER No report was given. (c) REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER There was a brief discussion regarding the landfill issues. (d) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING Please refer to Section (6)(a). (a) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL No report was given. (6) STAFF OVERVIEW OF DISTRICTS' PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES (a) Status Report on Jobs within the Plants and the Districts by the Director of Engineering The Director of Engineering advised that the new Agenda Calendar will now be included in the PDC Agenda packages. He explained that many items are subject to change because they pertain to construction. • Minutes of Planning, Design and Construction Committee Meeting Page 3 May 2, 1996 The Director of Engineering gave an updated report on Change Order No. 1 to Contract 7-22, Lemon Heights Replacement Project, regarding the slurry backfill, as requested by Director Hammond at the April 4, 1996 PDC Committee Meeting. Our specifications called for select material and not slurry backfill. The EMA inspector who was on the job required us to slurry backfill manholes and lateral pipelines that crossed traffic lanes in the streets in an effort to facilitate the construction and get traffic back to normal. In the future, we can provide a bid item in the specification for the contractor. Although we cannot anticipate where the extra work items will be, we can anticipate the need for them, and issue a change order if it does occur. The Director of Engineering gave an update on the Slater Avenue Pump Station construction. As mentioned at last month's meeting, we have given the contractor a plan change to allow him to do the work in the street and to get the traffic lanes open to full traffic as soon as possible. We are still working with the contractor to finalize the schedule and associated costs. The Districts are trying to obtain a Coastal Permit through the City of Huntington Beach regarding Job No. J-34, which is the Replacement of the Surge Tower at Plant No. 2. We obtained a Coastal Permit in January 1996, but it was appealed by one of the City Council members relative to aesthetic issues regarding the view of the surge tower from Pacific Coast Highway. We subsequently appealed some of the issues and received some new conditions from the Planning Commission within the permit. We again appealed the conditions to the Huntington Beach City Council. We will be meeting with Councilman Tom Harmon, who is the appellate for the City of Huntington Beach, and the Planning Department staff tomorrow morning to try to resolve the issues relative to landscaping so we can move forward with the project. In an effort to accommodate the City, we moved forward a landscaping project that we anticipated building two years from now, which will help address some of the aesthetic issues relative to the surge tower. We hope that by moving that project forward and getting the City Involved in our Strategic Plan relative to aesthetic issues, we can come to a resolution. The Director of Engineering reported on the Space Utilization Study. There was a meeting with the consultant this afternoon to discuss the project. In consideration of the changing environment within the organization and the downward trend in staffing, there was discussion regarding changes in the way we are viewing the Space Study. We will be meeting again in one week to discuss the change and the direction of the study and scope, and will then meet with the Ad Hoc Committee Re Space Utilization Study to make sure everyone is in agreement. Aiming towards closure, we are trying to decide what the space needs are of the existing staff, and to establish a philosophy for future space planning. It was discussed and agreed upon that an Ad Hoc Committee be scheduled to discuss options of the Space Utilization Study further. Minutes of Planning, Design and Construction Committee Meeting Page 4 May 2, 1996 (8) ACTIONS RE PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTS (a) Monthly Change Order Report by Director of Engineering on Change Orders approved by the General Manager, Planning, Design and Construction Committee, and Joint Boards. None to report. (9) ADDENDA TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS None to report. (10) NEW PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS None to report. (11) CONSIDERATION OF NEW AND MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS PDC96-17: Consideration of motion to recommend approval of the requested Capital Outlay Revolving Fund for Fiscal Year 1996-97. The Director of Engineering and the Director of Finance presented the draft Capital Outlay Revolving Fund (CORF) budget for Fiscal Year 1996-97. The requested CORF budget totals $44,895,000, an increase of 34%from last years request of$33,530,000. Eighty-five percent(85%)of the requested budget is for construction, seven percent (7%) is for design, and eight percent(8%) for planning and research. The categories of requested funds include: improved treatment(48%), rehabilitation (26%), support facilities and systems (21%), and added capacity (5%). The Directors reviewed the proposed budget and requested additional information regarding previous budget approvals for cost tracking purposes. A new schedule with project cost comparison will be included in the submittal for the Boards of Directors Meeting. It was moved, seconded, and carried to recommend approval of this item. PDC96-18: Consideration of recommendation authorizing issuance of purchase order to ADS Environmental Services, Inc. for an amount not to exceed $131,300 for flow monitoring services to be used in the preparation of our Strategic Plan. The Director of Engineering explained that this project is part of the work needed to do for the Strategic Plan, in particular, the work that CDM is doing relative to the hydraulic analysis of the collection system. What is proposed is a two-phase sewer monitoring program to gather dry weather and wet weather flow data. The data will be used by the consultant in projecting sewage generation rates and flows, and to consider wet v Minutes of Planning, Design and Construction Committee Meeting Page 5 May 2, 1996 weather issues relative to sewer in-flow and infiltration. We are proposing to monitor 30 different stations throughout the Districts for 14 days during this first dry weather phase of the work, and then follow-up next winter during the wet weather for 30 days to establish some wet weather flow patterns. After some discussion, it was moved, seconded, and carried to recommend approval of this item. (12) CLOSED SESSION The Chair determined that there was no need for a closed session. (13) OTHER BUSINESS, IF ANY None. (14) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING It was suggested that with Daylight Savings Time now in effect, it might be a good time to take advantage of the light by taking a tour of some of the projects under construction. It was discussed that August may be a good month to conduct these tours. (15) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT There were no matters discussed. (16) NEXT MEETING (a) Joint Boards of Directors Meeting -- Wednesday, May 22, 1996, at 7:30 p.m. (b) Ad Hoc Committed Re Space Utilization Study, Wednesday, May 29, 1996, at 5:30 p.m. (b) Planning, Design and Construction Committee Meeting -- Thursday, June 6, 1996, at 5:30 p.m. (c) Joint Boards of Directors Meeting --Wednesday, June 26, 1996, at 7:30 p.m. (17) OTHER ANNOUNCEMENTS. IF ANY None. 1 Minutes of Planning, Design and Construction Committee Meeting Page 6 May 2, 1996 (18) ADJOURNMENT The /JChair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:45 p.m. ate ,.emu Gail A. Cain Planning, Design and Construction Committee Secretary J:1WPDOCFDC%NNY M2%.WN JOINT BOARDS OF DJRECTORS REGULAR MEETING MAY 22, 1996 Agenda Item (14)(C): PDC96-18 Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to issue a purchase order to ADS Environmental Services, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $131,300 for Dry Weather and Wet Weather Flow Monitoring Services to be used in the preparation of our Strategic Plan. Summary In March 1996, the Boards of Directors approved professional services agreements which launched Phase I of our new Strategic Plan. One of the three projects included in our Phase I planning is Management of Peak Hydraulic Discharges, Job No. J40-1, awarded to Camp Dresser& McKee, Inc. (CDM). As part of the Management of Peak Hydraulic Discharge work, our consultant will project wastewater flows expected over the planning period and propose ways to reduce peak storm flows. In order to do that, our consultant has requested a two- phased monitoring program, which includes gathering both dry weather and wet weather flow data. The dry weather flow data will be used to check flow generation rate data based on land use categories and develop flow data necessary for a flow model. The wet weather flow will be used to determine the contribution from storm in-flow and infiltration. In order to do this work, our consultant, CDM, prepared a scope of work for the two-phased flow monitoring program and solicited quotations from local, qualified firths for flow monitoring services. Two firms considered by CDM to be qualified to do the work submitted proposals to monitor 30 stations for 14 days for the first phase (dry weather) and 30 days for the second phase (wet weather). The fans submitted the following proposals: ADS Environmental Services $131,300 MGD Technologies, Inc. $149,565 Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Planning, Design and Construction Committee recommend that the Boards authorize the General Manager to issue a purchase order to ADS Environmental Services in an amount not to exceed $131,300 for Dry Weather and Wet Weather Flow Monitoring in accordance with the vendor's proposal dated April 19, 1996 and the scope of work prepared by CDM. PDC Committee Recommendation The PDC Committee concurs with the recommendation of staff. Jawr�wcaswwYe .roc County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,CalHornia P.O.Box 8127•10844 Ellis Avenue _ Fountain Valley,CA 9272"127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE Wednesday. Mav 8. 1996. 5:30 P.M. A meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on May 8, 1996 at 5:30 p.m., at the Districts' Administrative Offices. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: Committee Directors Present: Staff Present: Roger R. Stanton, Vice Chair Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager John C. Cox, Jr., Joint Chair Blake P. Anderson, Assistant General Manager Jan Debay Judith A. Wilson, Assistant General Manager Burnie Dunlap Ed Hodges, Director of General Services Admin. James Flora David Ludwin, Director of Engineering John M. Gullixson Gary Streed, Director of Finance Wally Lynn Mike Peterman, Director of Human Resources Thomas Saltarelli Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications William G. Steiner Steve Kozak, Financial Manager Peer Swan Linda Eisman, Training Manager Dawn McKinley, Sr. Human Resources Analyst Committee Directors Absent: Mike White, Controller Isiah Mitchell, Training Supervisor George Brown, Chair Terri Josway, Safety & Emergency Response Mgr. Other Directors Present: Others Present: John Collins Tom Woodruff, General Counsel (2) APPOINTMENT OF A CHAIRMAN PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS No comments were made. Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee 9 Page 2 May 8, 1996 (4) REPORTS OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR. GENERAL MANAGER. ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER($). DIRECTOR OF FINANCE/TREASURER. DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND GENERAL COUNSEL (a) Report of the Committee Chair The Committee Chair had no report. (b) Report of the General Manager Don McIntyre gave a brief verbal report and slide presentation on the proposed upcoming 1996-97 Operating Budget. He noted that the Steering Committee had an opportunity to review progress on the proposed budget last month. Since then, staff has been able to bring the budget down from the proposed 640 FTE to 624 total staffing for this upcoming budget period. Costs per mgd are expected to remain at $555, which is the same cost for mgd as expected for 1995-96. Don announced that the proposed budget will be presented to the Committee at their June 12th meeting. (c) Report of Assistant General Manager -Administration The Assistant General Manager of Administration had no report. Report of Assistant General Manager - Operations The Assistant General Manager of Operations had no report. (d) Report of the Director of Finance/Treasurer The Director of Finance/Treasurers written report was contained in the agenda package. (e) Report of the Director of Human Resources The Acting Director of Human Resources had no report. (f) Report of the Director of General Services Administration The Director of General Services Administration had no report. (g) Report of General Counsel General Counsel had no report. Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 3 May 8, 1996 (5) APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the draft minutes of the April 10, 1996, meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee. (6) Consideration of PD&C96-17 - Consideration of motion to recommend approval of the requested Capital Outlay Revolving Fund for Fiscal Year 1996-97. David Ludwin handed out two booklets prepared for the Committee's review and reported on the 1996-97 CORF budget. A slide presentation was given by David Ludwin and Gary Streed. Mr. Ludwin reviewed the projects and noted that 85% of the budget would go toward construction, 8% toward planning and research and 7% toward design. Mr. Streed reviewed the costs to the individual Districts, total capital requirements and how these requirements will be met this year without an increase in sewer service fees. Total Capital Improvement Funding is expected to be $44,895,000 this year, an increase of 34% from last year's request. Following discussion, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval of the proposed Capital Outlay and Revolving Fund (CORF) budget . (7) OLD BUSINESS FAHR96-07 Consideration of motion to receive and file status report on Legal Services Committee Activities relative to in-house General Counsel Services. Judy Wilson gave a brief report of the activities to date re the Steering Committee's desire to review in-house General Counsel activities and the formation of the AD Hoc Committee on Legal Services. Judy introduced Greg Mathews who reported in more detail on these activities. Based on various analyses such as cost of proposed in-house legal services, quantitative vs. qualitative issues, staffing utilization, availability, reporting relationships and financial impact, one Attorney, one Paralegal, and one Legal Secretary would be required to operate an in-house office. Duties and responsibilities would focus on the performance of general legal services representing approximately 2,500 hours annually of legal workload. An in-house General Counsel Office is estimated to save the Districts approximately $45,500 annually in offset contract legal fees. Tom Woodruff advised that the possibility of an in-house counsel was looked at one year ago with no changes made. Mr. Woodruff expressed no objection to an in-house counsel as a cost-saving method for the Districts. Tom further advised Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 4 May 8, 1996 he is currently working with Marc Dubois, the new Contracts and Purchasing Manager, who filled the position on March 11, 1996. Tom stated that Marc is already doing an excellent job. Following discussion among the Directors, it was moved, seconded and duly carried to receive and file this status report. Director Gullixson indicated he would like this issue placed on the agenda for a future meeting, and perhaps form an Ad Hoc Committee to review attorney billings. FAHR96-11 Consideration of motion to receive and file PIMCO's Second Quarterly Performance Report. Investment Management Program. for the period January 1. 1996 to March 31, 1996. Steve Kozak summarized PIMCO's Second Quarterly Performance Report, Investment Management Program, for the period January 1, 1996 to March 31, 1996, and Callan Associates' second quarterly performance review for the same period. PIMCO is the Districts' contracted external money manager and Callan Associates is the Districts' independent investment advisor. Mr. Kozak advised that market fluctuations resulted in higher interest rates and a drop in the price of securities during the last quarter. The capital gain and loss from the last two quarters have offset one another. PIMCO is in compliance with the Districts' Investment Program. Mr. Kozak advised that there have been changes in the government code which will be incorporated into the Districts' Investment Policy, and will be brought before the Committee in July for their annual review. The Districts will be fully on- line with Mellon Trust, the Districts' Custodial Bank, enabling us to receive "real lime" information. It was moved, seconded and duly carried to receive and file this report. FAHR96-26 Consideration of motion to accept staffs recommendation regarding future funding of Management Performance Review Plan. Dawn McKinley, Sr. Human Resources Analyst, provided a follow-up report and slide presentation to her initial report to the FAHR Committee on April 10, 1996. She indicated the FY96/97 merit fund will be distributed in July 1996 according to the FY96197 Merit Bonus Guidelines. 5.0 percent of the payroll pool (totaling $569,415)was recommended to fund the FY97/98 MPRP reviews in July 1997. Three (3.0%) percent of the pool was proposed to be distributed as a non-base building merit bonus, and 2.0 percent, or an amount equal to CPI, whichever is lower, was proposed to be distributed to provide a base building market adjustment. The actual dollar amounts to be Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 5 May 8, 1996 distributed are estimated to be $204,547, to be distributed to employees for meritorious performance which is estimated to be 1.85 percent of the management payroll. Some portion of equity issues will also be met with the merit pool funds. Dawn indicated that this proposal is subject to "meet and confer" with the professional and supervisory bargaining units. Their current contract expires on January 31, 1997. Negotiations will be underway in fall of 1996. The approval of this item will ensure that a pool of money is established for performance awards in July 1997 for continued implementation of a merit pay program, and will provide Board support for a performance-based pay program. After considerable discussion, it was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve staff s recommendation with a 2% funding for the Bonus Pool rather than 3%. There was one nay vote. The Committee requested this item be brought and included with other issues in the meet and confer process. (8) NEW BUSINESS (Please Note: Though the following items were acted on in another sequence, the minutes will reflect them in numerical order for tracking purposes.) FAHR96-27 Consideration of motion to receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of March 1996. The month ended March 1996 Performance Monitoring Reports for Liquid and Long-term Operating Monies indicated that total investments amount to $359,143,505. All Investment Policy requirements are being followed and met. There was no discussion on this item. It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve and forward this report to the Joint Boards. FAHR96-28 Consideration of motion to accept staffs recommendation re adoption of new health benefit plan. Mike Peterman, Acting Director of Human Resources, reported that staff reviews the health benefit insurance plans on an annual basis to determine if the benefits and costs are consistent with market survey information from other agencies, cities and districts. It was concluded that the Northwestern National Life health plan was significantly overpriced and claims payment experience was less than satisfactory. The Districts' broker-of-record, Robert F. Driver Company, was asked in January to obtain estimates for health, dental and vision insurance. After employee informational meetings, MetraHealth was the clear front runner. Delta Dental provided a quotation which would allow the Districts to convert its self-insured plan to fully insured at a slightly higher rate of$1,000 per month. Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 6 May 8, 1996 Staff also requested our broker to investigate vision insurance and is proposing to offer vision coverage to all employees regardless of the plan they choose at a cost of$99,324 annually. Net savings to the Districts after all of these changes are estimated to be $688,687. The Committee expressed dissatisfaction with Robert F. Driver's past performance in obtaining competitive health benefit packages and noted that the Districts have not been well served in this area of insurance. Following discussion among the Directors, it was moved, seconded, and after a hand vote, duly carried to approve staffs recommendation to accept the change in the health benefit plan, but to withhold the vision insurance benefit to the collective bargaining process. The changes are as follows: Revision of Resolution 95-105 to reflect agreement with represented employee units to substitute the Matra Health Point-of-Service plan for the Northwestern National Life medical coverage; fund dependent medical premiums at 80% and employee-only coverage at 100%; convert dental insurance from self-funded to fully-insured through Delta Dental; and amend the Memoranda of Understanding with the Districts' bargaining units, and other plan documents accordingly, effective July 1, 1996. FAHR96-29 Consideration of motion to consider alternatives for renewal of All-Risk Property Insurance lincludina Fire. Flood and Earthquake Coverage)for FY 1996-97. Steve Kozak gave an overview of the Districts' current All-Risk Property Insurance, including fire, flood and earthquake which expires at the end of June 1996, and presented two renewal options provided by the Districts' broker of record, Robert F. Driver Company. After discussion on this item, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried to authorize staff to bind over our current coverage, and negotiate with Robert F. Driver to reduce the cost of coverage, and report back next month. The Committee further requested that staff provide information on Robert F. Driver's commission structure and what commission they are requesting on each of the insurances they provide us. FAHR96-30 Consideration of a motion to renew Excess Workers' Compensation Insurance for the period May 1996 to May 1999, with the California Municipal Excess Workers' Compensation (CAMEX) Program. Steve Kozak briefly reported that the Districts' Broker-of-Record, Robert F. Driver Company, and staff reviewed Excess Workers' Compensation insurance alternatives and learned that the current policy underwriter, American International Group (AIG), has changed its underwriting philosophy and was Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 7 May 8, 1996 proposing an approximate 35% increase in renewal rates. Driver considered other insurance carriers and, following negotiations with five firms, secured Continental Casualty Company (CNA)for the CAMEX program effective with the May 1996 renewal. The renewal is for a term of three years with a rate guarantee, but the policy is subject to a payroll audit. No additional premium is due unless payroll is increased by more than 10%. After brief discussion, it was moved, seconded and duly carried to renew Excess Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability Insurance for the period May 1996 to May 1999 with the California Municipal Works' Compensation (CAMEX) Program for a premium of$22,678, which could be adjusted based on a payroll audit. FAHR96-31 Consideration of responses to the Request for Proposals to develop a General Liability Risk Management Program for the Districts. Steve Kozak reviewed the responses received from the Request for Proposals to develop a General Liability Risk Management Program for the Districts effective July 1, 1996. He further provided a summary comparison of the proposals received from the Special District Risk Management Authority, the Califomia Sanitation Risk Management Authority, and Robert F. Driver Company. In response to questions, Gary Streed and Tom Woodruff advised that every year since 1986 the Committee has evaluated purchasing this insurance, however, premiums have consistently been very high. The rates quoted this year seem very reasonable. After discussion among the Committee members, it was moved, seconded and duly carried to: 1) Select the proposal submitted by Robert F. Driver to secure Comprehensive General Liability and Excess Liability insurance coverage for the Districts with a Self Insured Retention of$100,000, and a premium cost of approximately $118,750, and recommend approval to the Joint Boards of Directors with an effective date of July 1, 1996; and 2) Directed staff to further investigate the issue of"Known Events Risk Transfer." FAHR96-32 Consideration of motion to receive and file quarterly staff Summary Report of Training and for the Quarter ended March 31, 1996. Linda Eisman presented a brief Quarterly Staff Summary Report of Training for the Quarter ended March 31, 1996. She also gave a brief slide presentation. Linda indicated the Districts are in the process of centralizing and improving Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 8 May 8, 1996 District-wide training by implementing a Districts' Training Plan which includes required safety, technical and other training needs. She reviewed some of the major projects underway such as safety training, certification programs and the MPRP program. It was moved, seconded and duly carried to receive and file this report. FAHR96-33 Consideration of motion to approve payment of final billing amounts for the Landfill Acquisition due diligence consultant team. Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager-Operations, reviewed the final billing amounts for the consulting team who worked on the proposed acquisition of the Orange County Solid Waste Management System. Payment of these invoices would bring the total amount expended on consulting services for the landfill acquisition project to approximately $401,737.59. Staff and General Counsel efforts are estimated at an additional $100,000. The Board authorized $100,000 of the consulting work performed by Clements Environmental. Clements performed additional work amounting to $69,945.28. No written agreements were made for the work performed by the other two consultants. Blake advised the Committee that the Districts is still waiting for a response from the County regarding refunding our$100,000. The Districts may offer to provide the reports prepared by these consultants to the County. After discussion, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried to: 1. Approve the payment of$69,945.28 to Clements Environmental. 2. Form an Ad Hoc Committee comprised of Directors Swan, Gullixson and Salterelli to review the billings of Price Waterhouse and Saybrook Capital in more detail 3. Bring this item back to the FAHR Committee next month. FAHR96-34 Consideration of motion to review and approve the Third Quarter Report prepared by staff for the Period ended March 31. 1996. Mike White gave a brief review of the Third Quarter Report of financial and operational expenditures for the period ended March 31, 1996. He advised that 65.74% or$35,747,000 of the 1995-96 net joint operating budget of$54,380,000 has been expended. In addition, the Districts are at only 71.70 % of the target budget of$49,860,000. After a brief discussion on this matter, it was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the Financial and Operational Report for the third quarter ended March 31, 1996. Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 9 May 8, 1996 The Committee complimented Mike White for the improved format and information contained in the quarterly report. (9) CLOSED SESSION General Counsel reported to the Committee the need for a closed session, as authorized by Government Code Section 54956.9 to discuss and consider the item that is specified as Item (9)(b) on the published Agenda. The Committee convened in Closed Session at 8:50 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9. At 9:15 p.m. the Committee reconvened in regular session. Confidential minutes of the closed session held by the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. The Chair reported that an Ad Hoc Committee comprised of Directors Dunlap, Gullixson and Salterelli had been formed to review the professional services invoices from R. Craig Scott &Associates, and to report to the FAHR Committee in June. (10) OTHER BUSINESS, IF ANY None. (11) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING No reports were requested. (12) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT None. (13) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING DATES AND ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AT THOSE MEETINGS The next Committee meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, June 12, 1996. Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 10 May 8, 1996 (14) ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at approximately 9:20 p.m. Lenora Crane Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Secretary J:IW PDOCWINICRANEIFPC.MTOIFAHR.9%19N.MIMMFAHR5.96 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING MAY 22,1996 Agenda Item (15)(C): FAHR96-26 Consideration of motion approving the following revisions to MPRP (Management Performance Review Plan) Performance Inventive Values: (1) Establish a Target Merit Pool Fund of 2.0% of payroll for implementation in July 1997, as a non-base building bonus for performance that exceeds expectations or Is outstanding. (2) Provide for market adjustment not to exceed 2.0%of payroll or CPI for Los Angeles-Anaheim- Riverside,whichever Is lower. Summary On April 10, 1996,staff presented a report to the Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee that Identified the improvements made to the Management Performance Review Program,discussed the competitive position of the Districts'pay program,and defined the FY96/97 Target Merit Pool Fund of 5.0 percent as a non- base building merit bonus for employees whose performance exceeds expectations or is considered outstanding. This proposal is subject to'meet and confer"with the professional and supervisory bargaining units. Their current contract expires on January 31, 1997. Negotiations will be underway in the fall of 1996. The purpose of this action is to ensure that a pool of money is reserved for the continued implementation of a merit pay program and that there is Board support for a performance-based pay program. It is important to secure this commitment prior to the FY'96-07 since the performance based program presumes that the reward system will be in place for the following fiscal year. Staffs original recommendation for the FY97/98 MPRP fund was for a 3%non-base building merit bonus pool and a base-building market adjustment not to exceed 2%. After Committee discussion,the motion was revised to recommend a maximum 2%base-building adjustment and lower the non-base building merit pool from 3%to 2%. It was also discussed by the Committee that the total salary increase pool is subject to the"meet and confer"process. Recommendation 1. Staff recommends that a 4.0 percent of payroll pool(totaling$455,532)be established to fund the FY97/98 MPRP. Two(2.0) percent of the pool would be distributed as a non-base building merit bonus and 2.0 percent,or an amount equal to CPI,whichever is lower,would be distributed to provide a base building market adjustment. a) Establish a FY97/98 Target Merit Pool Fund of 2.0 percent of payroll(totaling$227,766)to be distributed as a non-base building bonus in July of 1997 to employees whose performance exceeds expectations or is considered outstanding. The fund would be distributed according to the FY 97198 Merit Bonus Guidelines. b) Provide for a market adjustment not to exceed 2.0 percent of payroll(totaling$227,766)or CPI for Los Angeles-Anaheim-Riverside, all urban consumers,whichever Is lower. The increase would be distributed equally to all employees who at least meet expectations to keep the employees'salaries at market. This increase amount is based on CPI and other market conditions,including comparison of increases at other cities and agencies. 2. Do not move FY97/98 pay ranges per the results of the salary survey discussed earlier. If copies of the staff report or further information is requested,contact Mike Peterman. JAW PDOCtaS1AG96WY9615.15C April 25, 1996 ... STAFF REPORT FAHR 96-26: Future Funding of Management Performance Review Program Bac g or and On April 10, 1996,staff presented a report to the Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee that identified the improvements that have been made to the Management Performance Review Program(MPRP)over the last seven months. The improvements identified will ensure that the FY96/97 Target Merit Pool Fund of 5.0 percent,and all future funds, are distributed for meritorious performance,which is performance that exceeds expectations or is considered outstanding. The improvements made to the program include a revised performance evaluation form,including performance objectives and measurement standards that support the agency's critical goals;extensive performance management training to all managers,supervisors and professionals; and,a merit bonus system in which the fund is distributed as a non-base building bonus. Staff also reported that the Districts' pay position is competitive with the market. The midpoints of the Districts' pay ranges are 6.9 percent above public sector midpoints and 8.2 percent above private sector midpoints;however,the average position of the employees' salaries within the pay ranges is only 44 percent(midpoint is 50 percent). This indicates that employees are actually being paid at market. Also,the distribution of salaries within the pay ranges is very close to the established target. Distributing the FY96/97 merit fund as a non-base building bonus will allow the Districts to maintain the competitive position of its salary structure,continue to pay employees market rates, and recognize above average management employees for meritorious performance in the delivery of critical goals. This method of distribution will best serve the Districts' financial interests by providing incentive while holding the line on payroll costs. The FY96/97 merit fund will be distributed according to the FY96/97 Merit Bonus Guidelines Chart(Exhibit 1). Per the Committee's request at the April 10, 1996 FAHR Committee meeting, the actual dollar amounts to be distributed have been added to the chart. As shown on the Guidelines Chart,an estimated$204,547 will be distributed to employees for meritorious performance which is 1.85 percent of management payroll. (These are estimates based upon the performance evaluations conducted in July of 1995. Specific amounts would not be known until the actual performance evaluations are completed in July of 1996). To the extent that there remain equity issues,some portion of the merit fund may be used to meet this need. Given the recent equity adjustments made in July, 1995, it is unlikely that there would be very many required. CSDOC 9 P.O. Boa 8127 • Fountain Valley,CA 82728.8127 0 (714)882.2411 FAHR 96-26 Page 2 of 2 April 25, 1996 This proposal is subject to"meet and confer"with the professional and supervisory bargaining units. Their current contract expires on January 31, 1997. Negotiations will be underway in the fall of 1996. The purpose of this action is to ensure that a pool of money is reserved for the continued implementation of a merit pay program and that there is Board support for a performance-based pay program. It is important to secure this commitment prior to the FY `96- 97 since the performance based program presumes that the reward system will be in place for the following fiscal year. Staff Recommendation 1. Staff recommends that a 5.0 percent of payroll pool (totaling$569,415)be established to fund the FY97/98 MPRP. Three(3.0)percent of the pool would be distributed as a non- base building merit bonus and 2.0 percent,or an amount equal to CPI, whichever is lower,would be distributed to provide a base building market adjustment. a.) Establish a FY97/98 Target Merit Pool Fund of 3.0 percent of payroll (totaling$341,649)to be distributed as a non-base building bonus in July of 1997 to employees whose performance exceeds expectations or is considered outstanding. According to a report published by William M. Mercer,a leading compensation and human resources consulting firm, the average lump sum bonus in lieu of pay increase for professionals in 1995/1996 will be 3.3 percent. The American Compensation Association reported that the average variable pay fund for 1995/1996 will be 5.3 percent. The average of the two projections is 4.3 percent. The fund would be distributed according to the FY97/98 Merit Bonus Guidelines Chart(Exhibit 2). As shown on the Guidelines Chart, an estimated $210,683 would be distributed to employees for meritorious performance which would be 1.85 percent of management payroll. b.) Provide for a market adjustment not to exceed 2.0 percent of payroll (totaling $227,766)or CPI for Los Angeles-Anaheim-Riverside, all urban consumers, whichever is lower. The increase would be distributed equally to all employees who at least meet expectations to keep the employees' salaries at market. This increase amount is based on CPI and other market conditions, including comparison of increases at other cities and agencies. 2. Do not move FY97/98 pay ranges per the results of the salary survey discussed earlier. DMM f.WomeMckinley\wpdoc�stfrep.pm2 Exhibit 1 6-97 Merit Bonus Guidelines 5% - 7% $23,219 Outstanding Performance 1% - 4% (3%) $181 ,328 Performance Exceeds *No merit Expectations $0 (41%) No contract Performance increase Meets No merit Expectations $0 (56%) Performance Needs Improvement (0%) to I *Note: 3% market adjustment for employees whose performance at least "Meets Expectations" will be $331,698 Exhibit 2 7-98 Merit Bonus Guidelines F' 5% - 7% $23,915 Outstanding Performance 1% - 4% (3%) $186,768 Performance Exceeds *No merit Expectations $0 (41%) No contract Performance increase Meets No merit Expectations $0 (56%) Performance Needs Improvement (0%) *Note: 2% market adjustment for employees whose performance at least "Meets Expectations" estimated to be $227,766 V JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING MAY 22, 1996 Agenda Item (15)(d): FAHR96-27 Consideration of motion to receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of March 1996. Summary Both Pacific Investment Management Co., PIMCO, and Mellon Trust began their professional external management of our funds in September 1995. In order to give the Directors an opportunity to review the month-end reports available from PIMCO, and to avoid distribution at the meeting, reports from the prior month are included with the agenda. Quarterly presentations are made to the Committee by PIMCO and our third-party independent consultant, Callan Associates. The second quarterly report from Callan Associates is on the agenda for this meeting. The Investment Policy adopted by the Joint Boards on May 24, 1995, includes reporting requirements as listed down the PIMCO Monthly Report for the "Liquid Operating Monies" and for the "Long-Term Operating Monies." All of the Investment Policy requirements are being complied with and performance to date exceeds the index rates. Cash at the Bank of America includes a tax apportionment received on Friday, March 29, which had not "cleared" and could not be transferred to another investment prior to March 31. Selances LEGOBond SDOC ''March 31 1996 ll.LAIF $ 8,624,809 erica 7,016,427 ort-term Portfolio 51,582,565 ng-term Portfolio 258,396,947 O Bond Fund 4,218 e Reserves @ Trustees 33,518,539 $359,143,505 Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the Committee receive, approve and forward this report to the Joint Boards. FAHR Committee Recommendation to Joint Boards of Directors That the Joint Boards of Directors receive, approve and file this report. J=PD0C1BS\AG96WAv96l5A5D May 22, 1996 CS DOC TOTAL CASH & INVESTMENTS 1995 - 1996 400 350 300 .2250 0 0 0 200 e 150 f 100 50 0 June 30 Juy 31 Au9.31 Sept 30 Oct 30 Nov.30 Dec.31 Jan 31 Feb.29 Mar.31 y JOINT BOARDS OF-DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING MAY 22,1996 Agenda Item (15)(e): FAHR96-28 Consideration of Resolution No. 96-52, amending Resolution No. 95-105, implementing MetraHealth Point-of-Service medical plan effective July 1, 1996, to fund dependent medical premiums at 80% and employee only coverage at 100%; and, to convert self-funded dental insurance to fully-insured program through Delta Dental. Summary The Districts Human Resources staff review the insurance plans on an annual basis to determine if the benefits and costs are consistent with market survey information from other agencies, cities, and districts. After review, staff came to the conclusion that the Northwestern National Life health plan was significantly overpriced. Furthermore, claims payment experience by staff was less than satisfactory. In January, staff asked the Districts broker, the Robert Driver Company, to obtain estimates for health, dental and vision insurance. Of the responses received MetraHealth (formerly MetLife)was the clear front runner for medical benefits. Delta Dental provided a quotation which would allow the Districts to convert its self-insured plan to fully insured at a slightly higher rate of$1,000 per month. By changing to fully insured, Districts' staff will save time in plan administration while fixing the price to the premiums quoted without having Fluctuations based on claims experience. The Districts' staff also asked our broker to investigate the vision insurance market. Limited vision coverage to Districts employees is currently being provided only under the FHP plan. Districts' staff proposed to offer vision coverage to all employees regardless of the plan they chose at a cost of $99,324 annually. The FAHR Committee was not comfortable adding vision insurance to the Districts' benefit plans at this time and recommended deferring the vision benefit to the collective bargaining process. The total savings to the Districts and its employees by approving staffs recommendations equal $926,204 per year. FAHR Committee Recommendation to Joint Boards of Directors Revision of Resolution 95-105 to reflect agreement with represented employee units to substitute the MetraHealth Paint-of-Service plan for the Northwestern National Life medical coverage, fund dependent medical premiums at 80% and employee only coverage at 100%, convert dental insurance from self-funded to fully-insured through Delta Dental, and amend the Memoranda of Understanding with the Districts' bargaining units, and other plan documents accordingly effective July 1, 1996. If copies of the staff report or further information is requested, contact Mike Peterman. J:1W PDOCViS\AG96NtAY%15.15E a RESOLUTION NO. 96-52 AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 95-105 (Personnel and Salary) A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,11,13, AND 14 OR ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING PERSONNEL AND SALARY RESOLUTION NO. 95-105 TO REFLECT AGREEMENT WITH REPRESENTED EMPLOYEE UNITS TO SUBSTITUTE THE METRAHEALTH POINT-OF-SERVICE PLAN FOR THE NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL LIFE MEDICAL COVERAGE; FUND DEPENDENT MEDICAL PREMIUMS AT 80% AND EMPLOYEE ONLY COVERAGE AT 100%; CONVERT DENTAL INSURANCE FROM SELF-FUNDED TO FULLY- INSURED THROUGH DELTA DENTAL; AND AMEND PLAN DOCUMENTS ACCORDINGLY EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 1996. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13, and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER; Section 39. Article XXIV, of Resolution No. 95-105 is amended as follows: A. Delete Section 39, Article XXIV. B. Add the following provision to Section 39, Article XXIV: The Districts' will contribute 100% of Employee Only premiums for the medical health plans and will contribute 80% of the Employee + 1 dependent and Full Family premiums. Any change in insurance rates will be shared equally in same ratio as premiums are currently paid by the Districts and employees. Section 44, Article XXIV, of Resolution No. 95-105 is amended as follows: A. Delete "Self-funded." B. Add "Fully-insured." PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 22, 1996. JAWPDOG�SRESVES96 &62WPD JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING MAY 22, 1996 Agenda Item (15)(fl: FAHR96-31 Consideration of responses to the Request for Proposals to develop a General Liability Risk Management Program for the Districts Summary On March 13, 1996,the Finance Administration and Human Resources(FAHR) Committee considered a motion to receive and file a staff report regarding review of the Districts'risk management and insurance activities. The purpose of the program evaluation was to initiate a regular review of the Districts'Risk Management Program and to recommend both short-term and medium-term improvements,based on industry benchmarks. At this meeting,the Committee authorized staff to solicit formal proposals for general liability insurance through Robert F. Driver Associates,the Special District Risk Management Authority and the California Sanitation Risk Management Authority. This Rem reports on the Request for Proposal process for development of a General Liability Risk Management Program for the Districts effective July 1, 1996. Staff Recommendation 1) Receive and file this report. 2) Select the proposal submitted by Robert F.Driver to secure Comprehensive General Liability and Excess Liability insurance coverage for the Districts with a Self Insured Retention of$100,000, and a premium cost of approximately$118,750,and recommend approval to the Joint Boards of Directors with an effective date of July 1,1996. 3) Provide direction to staff regarding further investigation on the issue of Known Events Risk Transfer. FAHR Committee Recommendation to Joint Boards of Directors The FAHR Committee recommends that the Joint Boards of Directors: 1. Select the proposal submitted by Robert F. Driver to secure Comprehensive General Liability and Excess Liability insurance coverage for the Districts with a Self Insured Retention of$100,000, and a premium cost of approximately$118,750,and recommend approval to the Joint Boards of Directors with an effective date of July 1, 1996; and, 2. Direct staff to further investigate the issue of"Known Events Risk Transfer." If copies of the staff report or further information is requested, contact Steve Kozak. JAW PDOCXBSV G96VAAY9e\5.l5F JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING MAY 22, 1996 Agenda Item (15)(g): FAHR96-33 Consideration of motion to approve payment of final billing amounts for the landfill acquisition due diligence consultant team. Summary The final billing amounts for the consulting team who worked on the proposed acquisition of the Orange County Solid Waste Management System were presented to the FAHR Committee for their review on May 8, 1996. Payment of the invoices from Clements Environmental, Price Waterhouse and Saybrook Capital would bring the total amount expended on consulting services for the landfill acquisition project to approximately $401,737. Staff and General Counsel efforts, are estimated at an additional $100,000. FAHR Committee Recommendation to Joint Boards of Directors After discussion, the FAHR Committee approved the formation of an AD Hoc Committee comprised of Directors Swan, Gullixson and Salterelli to review the billings of Price Waterhouse and Saybrook Capital in more detail and to return their findings to the FAHR Committee for consideration.. The FAHR Committee, at this time, recommends the Joint Boards of Directors approve the final payment of$69,945.28 to Clements Environmental. J:\W PDOCTIN\CRANE\FPC.MTGWAHR.96\PENNY.KYL\FAMRW.M May 8, 1996 STAFF REPORT FAHR96-33: Consideration of motion to approve payment of final billing amounts for the Landfill Acquisition due diligence consultant team Summary The final billing amounts for the consulting team who worked on the proposed acquisition of the Orange County Solid Waste Management System are presented for the FAHR Committee's review and approval for payment. Background A team of consultants was retained to provide technical and analytical support to Districts'Ad Hoc Committee re Landfill Issues,while working on the solid waste management acquisition project. The team included the following firms: Consultant Firm Discipline The Diamond Group Public relations and governmental liaison. Planning Solutions LAFCO application preparation. Clements Environmental Technical review of the County's dosed landfill sites and solid waste industry analysis. Price Waterhouse Financial modeling and system valuation. Saybrook Capital Financial analysis. On March 27, 1996, the Districts Joint Boards of Directors voted to withdraw the Districts' offer to purchase the County landfill system. At this time, staff is concluding the project, attempting to secure a refund of the $100,000 deposit paid to the County in December 1995, and settling the final billing statements with the consultant team. All of the invoices from The Diamond Group and Planning Solutions have been paid and the contracts are being closed. Those billing amounts are $24,000 and$12,000 respectively for all known charges through April 1996. With regard to Clements Environmental, the total of all invoices for work completed amounts to $168,945.28; a $68,945.28 overrun of the$100,000 initially authorized by their contract. The work constituting the overrun(closed landfill site assessments), however,was essential to the project during the seventy-five day exclusive negotiations period,and came at a point that did not allow for securing pre-approval. Staff was advised of the additional work Clements needed to complete on the closed landfill site investigations,directed the consultant to complete their studies, and now recommends that Clements Environmental be paid in full. Cs00C 0 P.O.Boa 8127 0 Fountain Valley,CA 92729-e127 0 (714)9e2-2411 FAHR96-33 Page 2 May 8, 1996 Price Waterhouse and Saybrook Capital participated on the project team providing system valuation,financial advice and modeling expertise. They initially became involved in the landfill acquisition project through their relationship as the professional team for the OCIP Creditors' Committee. Their assistance on the project was valuable and the deliverables produced served to guide critical decisions by the Districts. In December, as the seventy-five day exclusive negotiations period was proposed to the County Board of Supervisors, and the Districts' due diligence efforts accelerated, the Districts became, in essence, direct clients of Price Waterhouse and Saybrook Capital. These firms, however, did not have contracts in place with the Districts, and their consultant fees were left for negotiations until this time. Both firms have submitted final invoices representing their total work effort during the due diligence process. Although Districts' staff concurs with the value and quality of the assistance provided by both firms, staff has endeavored to negotiate more favorable final invoice amounts. Through our negotiations, both fines have agreed to discount their final billings by 14 percent. The following are the final billing amounts and those amounts discounted by the proposed 14 percent Negotiated Amounts Firm Invoice (Final billing amount Amounts discounted by 14%) Price Waterhouse $146.470.71 $125,104.81 Saybrook Capital 83,357.55 71,687.50 Payment of these invoices would bring the total amount expended on consulting services for the landfill acquisition project to $401,737.59. Staff recommends the payment of Clements Environmental, Price Waterhouse and Saybrook Capital in the fallowing amounts: Recommended Finn Final Payments Clements Environmental $ 69,945.28 Price Waterhouse 125,104.81 Saybrook Capital 71,687.50 Total $266.737.59 Staff Recommendation Consideration of motion to authorize payment of the final negotiated invoice amounts as follows: 1. Clements Environmental: $ 69,945.28 2. Price Waterhouse: $125,104.81 3. Saybrook Capital: $ 71,687.50 BA:Ic JIWPDOC�FIMCRFN@FPCMTOIFNIR.%15TAFFRVr.9F5RFAMRe6.33 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING MAY 22, 1996 Agenda Item (15)(h): FAHR96-34 Consideration of motion to receive and file Third Quarter Financial and Operations Report for the period ending March 31, 1996. u ma Attached, in a separately bound document, is the Districts' Financial and Operational Report for the third quarter ended March 31, 1996. This report is a consolidation of both the financial and operational accomplishments of the Districts through the third quarter of fiscal year 1995-96. Contained within the Financial Report section are budget summary reviews of the Joint Operating & Working Capital Funds, the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund, individual Districts, and the self-insurance funds. Contained within the Operational Report section is the status of the Activity Trends and Projects previously identified in the 1995-96 Approved Budget. As indicated within the Overview section of the report, 65.74 percent or$35,747,000 of the 1995-96 net joint operating budget of$54,380,000 has been expended. In addition, the Districts are still at only 71.70 percent of the 'larger' budget of$49,860,000. The total year-to-date cost per million gallons is $553 which is below the approved budget and target goals of$627 and $599, respectively. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Committee review and approve the Financial and Operational Report for the third quarter ended March 31, 1996. FAHR Committee Recommendation to Joint Boards of Directors The FAHR Committee concurs with staffs recommendation. J1W PDOCSSV GWMAY9615-15H FINANCIAL & OPERATIONAL REPORT For The Third Quarter Ended March 31 , 199 Y Q%STPICTS OF O'94 2p � yCF a .t F � 2 � O A U Y �onh'G THEE Table of Contents Section 1 - Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Financial Report- Section 2 - Joint Operating & Working Capital Budget Review Chart of Joint Operating Costs Per Million Gallons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Charts on the Gallonage Charge by Department . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Divisional Contributions to Gallonage Charge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Summary of Expenses by Major Category . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Summary of Expenses by Line Item . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Summary of Revenues by Line Item . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Comparison of Expenses by Department . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 -d Chart of Total Flows-Year-To-Date . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Chart of Staffing Trends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Section 3 - Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Review Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Graphs by Type and Funding Source . . . . . . . . 1 Summary of Joint Works Construction Requirement- Current Year . . . . . . . . . . 2 Summary of Joint Works Construction Requirement- Project Life . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Section 4- Budget Review by District Summary Budget Reviews-All Districts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 District No. 1 Budget Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 District No. 2 Budget Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 District No. 3 Budget Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 District No. 5 Budget Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 District No. 6 Budget Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 District No. 7 Budget Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 District No. 11 Budget Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 District No. 13 Budget Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 District No. 14 Budget Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Section 5- Self-Insurance Funds Budget Reviews Medical Fund Budget Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Public Liability Fund Budget Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Workers' Compensation Budget Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Operational Report- Section 6 -Activity Trends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Section 7 - Project Tracking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 i � I V This page was intentionally left blank I I L' U L� LI �J SECTION 1 . OVERVIEW J J J Overview Third Quarter Financial & Operational Report March 31, 1996 .m This is the second comprehensive financial and operational report prepared by staff that consolidates the financial and operational accomplishments of the Districts' through n the third quarter ended March 31, 1996. The intent of this report is to provide the Directors, staff, and the general public with a comprehensive overview of the financial condition of the Districts, report on the status of all capital projects in progress, and outline the status of major projects and departmental activity trends. A summary of the sections contained within this report is provided below. Joint Operating & Working Capital Budget Review At March 31, 1996, 65.74 percent or$35,747,000 of the 1995-96 net joint operating budget of$54,380,000 has been expended. Although net costs have increased 3.59 percent in comparison with the same period last year, the Districts' are still only at 71.70 percent of the target goal of$49,860,000. The total cost per million gallons (mg) dropped slightly to $553 from the mid-year total of$556, and is still $74 and $46 below the approved budget and target goals of$627 and $599, respectively, while the percentage change in flows increased less than 1.5 percent. As highlighted on the "Treatment Cost Per MG" shown on Section 1- Page 4, the cost per mg has fluctuated for each of the three quarters when analyzed independently while the accumulated costs-to-date started slowly with only $509 reported in the first quarter and then leveling out at the end of the second and third quarters at $556 and $553, respectively. Some of the factors contributing to the fluctuating per quarter cost of$509, $603, and $547 per mg for the first, second, and third quarters, respectively, include: • Environmental Monitoring costs, totaling $1,630,000, were reported in increments of 18 percent, 63 percent, and 19 percent for the first, second, and third quarters, respectively. The large percentage paid in the second quarter, totaling slightly more than $ 1 million, is attributable to the timing of payments made for ocean monitoring. In total, this line item is currently at 68 percent of the total budget and is expected to fall below budget at year end. ® • Repair Materials were reported at 31 percent in the first quarter, 57 percent in the second quarter, and at 9 percent in the third quarter. The majority of Section 1 - Page 1 L 1996-96 3rd Quarter Report the repair materials needed for this fiscal year were identified in the first and second quarters and purchased in the second quarter. Currently, repair materials are only at 55 percent of budget and are expected to fall significantly below budget at year end. Other significant Joint Operating results as of March 31, 1996: L • Salaries and Wages- Although total salary and wages are only at 69.24 percent of budget at mid-year, a net of 19 staff members have been added since the beginning of the fiscal year that will contribute to the total compensation paid out in the second half of the year. lr • Retirement- At the end of the third quarter, the retirement budget was expended at a higher rate than salaries and wages at 73.23 percent. This V higher percentage is reflective of$208,000 paid out for early retirement as well as the additional amounts paid for the third and final year payment for the rate increase resulting from the change in the Orange County 4 Retirement Systems actuarial assumptions. • Insurance- The Insurance line item was at $1,089,540, or 87 percent of v budget, at March 31, 1996. This overage is primarily due to the fact that the final insurance quotes were received after the budget was adopted. Staff is u currently examining insurance costs for next year and fine insurance proposals will be available prior to the adoption of the 1996-97 budget. Lr For more detailed information, Section 1 - Page 5 and Section 1 - Page 6 are line item expense listings. Page 5 is a listing of expenses incurred through each quarter with year-to-date percentages. Page 6 provides a comparison of expenses incurred by quarter along with the percentage expended for each quarter to the total expense incurred. i.i Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Review. At March 31, 1996, total Capital Outlay Revolving Fund expenditures totaled $13,876,000, or 41 percent of budget. Total projected capital expenditures for 1995-96 has been revised from $33.5 million to $22.5 million due to the delay of several major projects such as the: i -Primary Treatment Expansion of 72 mgd at Plant No. 1 V -Primary Clarifier Rehabilitation at Plant No. 1 -Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2 -Fire Protection and Water Systems Modifications at Plant No. 2 -Chemical and Plant Water Modifications at Plant No. 2 Surge Tower Replacement at Plant No. 2. W In addition, the new Warehouse Building at Plant No. 2 has been cancelled and the old u Section 1 - Page 2 W Overview Warehouse Building at Plant No. 2 will be remodeled instead. Budget Review by Districts: At mid-year, revenues of all Districts totaled $90,206,000, or 70 percent of budget. Only $3.28 million, or 36.1 percent, of the $9.1 million budgeted for IRWD Fees have been received. These fees are low primarily because the related operating and capital requirements for District 14 are also low and, although budgeted, District 14 is not currently funding capital reserves because of anticipated joint equity sales. Connection fees are already at 129 percent of budget, or $6.1 million due to unexpected growth within the Districts. Interest & Miscellaneous Receipts are also high at 112 percent of budget, or$17,723,000 because of both larger available cash balances and higher interest rate yields than was anticipated in the 1995-96 budget. Conversely, expenses and outlays of all Districts totaled $91,895,000, or 63.1 percent of budget at March 31, 1996 with no major deviations. Self-Insurance Funds Budget Reviews: The Districts' are self-insured for General Liability, Workers' Compensation and Employee Dental Insurance and provide separate fund accounting for the revenue and expenses incurred in managing these liability — claims. The revenues to these funds represent individual District contributions based on each District's share of Joint Works Operating Costs (sewage flows). Expenses to these funds include actual claims paid, claims administration, and excess loss policies. The Self-Insurance Fund revenues totaled $672,000 or 64 percent of budget at March 31 while total expenses were$660,000, or 65 percent of budget. Operational Review: The Operational Review section of this report pertains to the status of Activity Trends and Project Tracking as of March 31, 1996. Activity Trends provides a comparison of current activity trends as compared to budget. — Provided within this section are the key workload indicators of each Division that are constantly compared with pre-determined benchmarks and re-evaluated over time. Also included is an explanation of major variances or changes in the data. 7 Project Tracking summarizes all major divisional projects which were included in the 1995-96 budget. This section identifies each major project and indicates the title, division responsible, the status of the project, and the start and end dates. The status of all projects is also provided in chart form and includes the following project descriptions: -Ahead -On Track -Done -Behind -Not Started -On Hold -Cancelled Section 1 - Page 3 - 1995-96 3rd Quarter Report r Treatment Cost Per MG $700 r fern $625 r f5e7 f65e Sm ■tat G4 D2nd Or r $550 SM Sm 183TO Ga r fd75 r r fa00 Quadedy MG Cost Accumulated Cori/MGD r r r No r Section 1 - Page 4 Overview wv County Seniteuo Dlawcle manna•county Joint Operetln9 Eepmee mounted ThmuBh The Ouerbn Ended 80096,VmN858 34146 ... B B 4 Q E E fl 19"1 3Months 6Me ended 9Me ended "nand Ended Ended Ended 1NOm 2MOm sled 00 add,. INSIPID2 1221@9 =I °bm.9999m %.m99Mm %offid09tl Soled.,wo9.e humane 30.987,001) 8,602,801 18,130,746 27,581,016 21.72% 45.36% ".at% Cho,neem&E0o.ibm (11,900.0W) (1.91s,2401 17.21% 428M6 al Net Sebd.,wep.BOene)ns M,5).WO S,M).53 13,25.05 30.51,85 255014 46.35% 71.52% r✓ m u 1m, 0 M,35 8].25 119.04%, 181]% MAR% all. % the . 1,2 5}0 2 1,ohl M.10% 49. % 8718% Me all 29100 28.= 65.305 0.97% .01% 5.M11 OIO.up"I be 2M,f00 . 8 80,457 5,85 13W% M. % .59% OMUENmmellon 187,500 W247 80,167 132,1111 927% 61.0% U.9 % 04.Exeneecteet re 10810 18,OW 40,859 6, 3 17.60% 48.74% 74.00% Odoon0a mb 2,100.000 245,75 55,120 1,118,232 1 . 5% 3 .6 % 5.0]% mnmrelchoeab 1,716,000 246,07 510,0 1, 522 4.3 % 35.81% 81.8514 Cher,lhlma% 1,548,000 2 .75 557,052 M.528 lsM% 34.70% 44.44% ah Cheml.b&Sumlloe 55.000 M,15 15,027 251,9M 18.72% 30.83% 49.S0% Theb 125,400 24.430 M,15 81AM 18.49% 44.78% 64.86% SnNeede,en.neM innocent eupp 148,000 2],842 5,394 84,002 10.07% M.5% 57.5% OeeroperMNOeupplbe N7.600 61,M0 112,105 152,174 24.5% 54.0856 ".83% Ghrun0e8edpil4 a J.Mrlol Sara . 213,000 21,708 5,249 40937 10.19% 23.58% 23.44% OWelde leh Smecee 15.W0 9.M4 24,763 41,285 6.24% 16.51 27.62% Solks Removal 5,425,0110 1,373,15 USE= 4,099,45 25.32% 62.5% ]5.5)16 Oeer.hoWemend 14D,= 13,W9 16,BM 94,55h, 9.29% 11.35% Ill r Orypn plant door B none 610,000 12],]84 235,3311 S5,W4 25.5% 45.14% 70.30% Other Conuaenual Smdi.s 51,SW 66.188 M9255 Sol 10.3M6 42.0994 all .npl Servl.s 600,000 I57,14 340p54 4119,1M 31.24% SEEM M.52% Ales a ACMpnun9 MAW law V,818 27,618 M.68% MAS% 30.4614 vs Emin.dm 2MAW 2],M) 70,322 118.408 S.M% 24.33% 41,00% Oeor PM SeM. 55,BW 00,740 WAS5 3W,111 1&39% 40.07% M.C)% In house pdmin9 219,10 22,367 116,25 162" 10.21% 5.5% B3.46% OWelde pr510n0 W,600 3,61M 14,M3 WA? 8.06116 23.12% 0.03% Pholo pmrette9 32,700 am 13,55 220M 17.84% 41.4896 5.5% Noucee ende 29.500 10,847 W,234 37,115 36.T)% 68A894 125.51% OWeldn Emulpmenl Renbl 15,W0 33,712 46,504 64,722 30.03% 42.91 5M% Dleeden Edulpmmi Rental 126,701) 2=4 45.883 74,115 IB.M% 3).W% INSAM Ropam Moderate 0175.900 1 1,675,374 1.51411 11 49.63% U.M Repair SeM.Comment mM,SW 215.672 407.15 540,927 25.00% 48.82% 64.88% EnelmnmaMal Mondorl 2,375,0110 2B8.9d5 1.318,4M 1,BW.2M 12.14% 65,51% El A"mifity Mona, iM.WO - BW 850 - 0.42% 0.42% Research M.= 50.145 187,45 2118,622 9.86% 31.16% fond% m T41ne0,Threat B meem, 847.530 0 .= 180.3511 3610,434 13.94% 21.5% 66.8T% OnolledehleA ides 18,0311, 131 171 171 OAMI 1.14% 1.14% Dl.el lot termalon 26,00) - - - - - - EletNCPowor 1.075,0131) 2M,M8 404,45 5754021 19.01% 37.2% 5.40% r Natural G. 1.40,11.000 245,645 421,781 713,25 17.54% 30.13% W.M% Telephone 128,W0 M612 60= 113.25 21,13% SIM% 901 Weer 75,000 W,412 2141,50 Still 12.06% 311.51% 47.5% Fri M.m 10.317 Male 42AM 12.5% 3202% 52,80% Genehr10lher Fxp 610.000 72,451 WIN 15,1W 1944% 30.0% 36.76% °d A01ADOpemin9F.s 25,000 all 89.129 1240W 14.43% 35.5% 4964% Pndr Years Eep W,OW - - - - OeerNonOprExp 84,SW 14,937 5,a55 39,149 16.70% 31.56 42.25% CoalAm.lbnWnleledebB sery (<M,OW) (1M,1M) (15,M5) (161,257) 27.26% 33.M% 34.31% Net M485b M,613,000 6.31),0)1 12.70,211 1e,348,576 18.02% 43.15% 62.16% Not RewnSs (3.30D,O00) (91 (1,53,M2) (2,871,969) 24.92% 52.20% 75.5% Net Join OphrM9 Expense 54,300,000 11,107,584 24.01 35.975,459 20.43% M.25% 66.16% r Total Flow In Milli.Gellons M,50 21.808 0,285 85075 25.16% 495% )50]% Coed or Mloon Galbns 627 SM 5% 55 81.18% 841 5.20% Section 1 - Page 5 er 1995-96 3rd Quarter Report W y. County Unumon oMbkle Oronnpo County JOIn1OWtMnt EnWnsn ComWaerm el Cuarlen Student BMM8,1N098,b 3131M W 9 9 G 0 E E ]NM- 1=1 =I M NV 1Otr 2nEW 3 0 8�' S ]IQ1125 iQ1@& %9LIPMI %sLT9IM 9h9L7ffi91 SnbvMb angers&tundas 8682,001 9,447,944 %450.271 31.0% 34.26% MUM y CtraBeoW belbco0one (1,945,249) (2,899,00) (2234,393) 27.40% 40.96% 31.5614 NH SeMfl-,waB-e MnMN 6,333,6153 6,548414 7,215,872 32.65% 31.84% 35.20% oeaolNe 28353 37,886 51.790 24.68% 31.8096 43.51% LI Insursnon 363.707 383,)0] 362.126 WU% MU% M.24% MemnMln 28,400 SW 26.355 51.35% 099y6 47.85% CIRoo EnWnse-S ..San 26.286 32,171 38,398 20.20% W.22% 33.58% ol6co emmnlbn 30,347 68610 36.604 NAm 49.5]% 27.53% y OIIMe Fipenso-MlM3 18AW 31,859 28,759 23A9% 41. 0% X.W% Cea control Mlemlpb 245,769 418,364) 451,10 22.02% 37SM 40A1% SuBMe."tlMminb 240.W7 384,52E 55219% 21.16% 31.33% 47.52% C9emlWl oWBUNMe 241.798 285.264 149,446 X.M 0.01% 21.T3% labobeminls&SUWlM4 85.109 71,818 9S.WB 33.78% 28,51% 33.31% taw Todh 24,439 31,719 24.913 30.15% MAM Ulm scm.M tlemiOs&JanMMeI WW 27,842 28.552 27.6118 MAI% MU% 32.93% g0eroperellllp eupNbe 51.760 W,395 40,64(9 M.88% 38.W% 26.68% firO W.Wp6p IS Jenl1a0n1 SOMIum, 21,705 286n (312) 43.4B% 57AM (0.62)% 6d ONeMO Lab Senkes 8.31PI 15,389 iB,532 22.66% 37.26% 4004% With,Rem 1 1,373,70 1A81,540 1,244,098 M.51% 35.14% M.35% OBleraefMmmorel 18068 2,9&6 W,BBO 15.59% 3.41% 31.2096 aen SgONmll0eo eCnOn&ImMM.e ran ,]% 107.54 12, W . % 289 % X Mar a SaMee 86,1W 20,)7) 110A511 16.25% 4Cn% Xm Legal Station. 107,414 1 118.293 0.82% 33.42% 2 ]we8&A.unlnp 188M II,r4 3 % 4269% 06" Engkoraft 42,525 9,10 23.0% 35.89% 40. % Corer Services W.748 1 1W1W 22. 8% 33.61% 4 .13% In honpftM 2W MAI W. 0 12. % 51.3M ] .5 % Outsideohoung 3,654 18889 14 .11% 35.3 % U.53% ftoboueWB 5.634 , 8.624 26.4 % 35.01% WU% NMW.&BBB 1880 9,387 18191 29.23% .2 % 45.0% CuwnOnl RenMl 2 180 17,915 52. % M.23% oY0la E,WOMn RaMM 23=4 2 ,659 27.295 31.88% .82% Ulm RepetrMMeMle 625. I,O50,025 33.88% W.00% Olm 215.6n 191.514 IWJ34 9.87% 35.400K, . 3% yWy�aaI ErnholmeMl MonWBng 28.335 1, W, 3111822 13.0 % 5819%, 19.1 % AO Mo 650 - OW% 1WW% O.W% Rerernada W,145 137 314 0,163 17.00% 47.91% 34.60% I TrtlnNg,TmM aounta lgu 0120 W,1W 190,- 25.04% 25,W% 40.9 % UIICOIbtlable Rradars 13 40 - 7881% 23 39% 0.006 olveel Pavan 1a Elearal Parser 204.598 ZW.4W 1W,555 SS.BS% X.e1% 20.4M NtlaMGns 226.512 136,238 W.24 23.41% 24.71% 40.83% W ter 9B.512 351510 W.243 23.41% 51.26% 44.W% y Walar 9r412 115,698 92,847 24SM W.i6% 33.04% 9 ns 18317 15,201 18W4 24.52% 38.12% 39.14% General Ogler Eap 33A51 91,3X 389W 3B.07% 42.W% 1i.14% &CMOCWMIInB Fees 38,0B 53,051 X.BBI 2B.Oi% 42.]5% 28.17% YrJ PMrYems Exp Goer Non OWr En 14,833 15.018 10.074 37.18% 37.5196 25M% Coal&Ibullon MmelMeM6xN (128.130) (20,315) (4,912) MA8% 17.54% 2.98% NO 1,191eMN 5.317.071 7,448140 8588M5 20.98% 40.SM M-43% y NO Redenun (947,039) (1,210,403) (880,513) n.98% 36.09% 30.84% Na JaM CWnIMO Enpanns 11,107,594 12.M.151 11,010,724 30.11M 36.02% 33,11% TWO FIoa M M01bn GMNn 21.WS 21.477 21,790 33.51% 33.00% 33.46% 1-I Cdq WrMIIIIM Wllne 5W W3 547 92.04% 109.04% Sam% y Section 1 - Page 6 u r r r r r SECTION 2. JOINT OPERATING & WORKING CAPITAL BUDGET REVIEW r ri r r u r r r J.O. & W.C. Budget Review r Joint Operating Costs Per Million Gallons r 640 r ............................................................... Budget-$627 615 �e .......................................'""................... Target.$599 590 r g a S6S c .............. ....." ..................................... Cuff.Pro].-S553 r o 540 i !' o G 515 r Fz—,,3, W30 Prod 480 3131 CaHMO CoeNMG 465 91-92 92-93 93-94 94.95 95-96 r r r Section 2-Page 7 r L 1995-96 3rd Quarter Report L Gallonage Charges by Department For The Nine Months Ended 3131196 And $300.00 V $250.00 � i u $200.00 W 0 k 8150.00FE ,q $100.00 _ L 8 i $60.00 L i $0.00 Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Budget Target 95.9E YW Li 1990-91 1991-92 1992-93 1993.94 199"5 1995-96 1995-95 —.--Total MalMonexe tTotel Opentlom —Total Tah Servioas L $40.00 __________ __________ ____________________ __________ Y.I $35.00 ------------------_-- ---------- __________ ___ ____ _____ � _ _____ __________ $30.00 ____________________ __________ _______ ___________ L _________ __________ M6.00 _________ ........ .......... .......... ................ 3Z0.00. _ _____ _ _________ __________ __________ ____________________ _____ ____ V m $15.00 __ ______ _____ __________ O _ $10.00 ----- lal $5.00 ________ __________ __________ ____________________ li $0.00 Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Budget Target 95.96 YW 1990-91 1991-92 1992.93 1993-94 1981-95 1996418 1995-08 W Total Management —>FTctel Human Resources —al—Talol Finance tTotal IMortnatlon BervRach —�To1al EnBimenlrg L Section 2-Page 2 I u J. O. & W. C. Budget Review �+ Divisional Contributions to Gallonage Charge For The Nine Months Ended 3131196 1990-91 1991-92 1992-93 1663-ed 1904-95 1995-96 1995-98 1995-96 wd Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Budget Target Yr to Data Annual Flow In Mlllicn ee11on9 98,048.30 S2,Ma17 84,999.62 84,321.90 80,488.60 96.088.61 we"S.61 65,075.42 2150 General Manager 12.02 9.03 8.45 6.76 15.64 8.81 8.33 10.29 c' 21W Sunni Semmery 0.34 2,12 0.]] 0.83 0.66 1.66 in 1.29 2170 Management Support 1.50 3.70 2.69 2.83 2.47 0.0 OA3 0.23 2190 Communimtlare 7.80 7.04 5,32 rd Total Menagement 13.87 14.85 11.90 10.42 19A7 18.90 1726 17.13 2100 Pemonnel&SexrW 5.46 13.25 a." 8,99 11.78 - - - 2510 HRAOMnInjaWn - - - - - 3,45 3AS 4.03 25M HR&Tfalning - - - - - 5.92 5.25 6.56 ur 2530 Safety&Emcg Re6ponae 7.05 6.51 7.0 _ . Taint Humes Res .. S." 1325 0.98 a." 11.79 46A2 Is" 1728 =10 Dlrof Finance ].5] 1s." 1319 16.95 17.01 17.87 la.W 20.68 rd 2220 A ntlng 5.50 7.63 6.57 6.59 0.24 1203 11.35 10.74 MO Pumhasing&Werahoming 5.39 6.m 6.25 6.01 6.18 an am 7A4 Total Finance 1BA8 U23 2SAI 29AS 32.49 38.67 30.37 MA0 r 2240 Infmmatlon SeMms 6.29 IM13 11.79 13.60 14.15 - - - 2410 Info Tech Administs8on - - - - - 3.07 2.67 2.17 2420 Haniwem Support - - - - - 7.42 6.27 8.18 243o S011were Support ]At 6.68 13.00 ¢" Total lnloraraton Servlfech 020 10.13 11.79 13.60 14.15 17.90 15.72 2126 3310 Dimdor of O&M 11.05 926 9.56 9.87 1224 Total 01r cf 0&M 11.08 020 am 9.87 12.24 �. MiO D1nm%rcf MehBena. - - - 3.06 2.00 4.98 U20 MlceB edulhq - - 5.73 5.36 6.47 3330 Plant Mice 34.10 39.27 4221 39.02 38.14 37.62 37.28 37.10 We Co9%gon8 4.08 7.72 3.52 3.65 2.82 3.95 3.04 4.55 33W Me mMwl 50.90 56.40 59.80 58.09 68.68 01.10 63.84 53.65 3360 Eletaical 13.94 17.79 17.66 20.96 20.80 Mae 22.05 19A4 W70 Insirumeniellon 14.W 10.21 T2.51 2].W 29.1] 34.32 32.6E 2T.78 �y TOYI Malmmn8nca 111.8T D9.]9 14&]I 148.48 14T.T8 1T443 187.13 16329 3410 DIrMOpe,40" - - - - - 14.02 13.82 15.70 M*1110 Plad Op udions 148.42 162.78 192.77 105.02 167.90 2 A3 268.96 228.66 m Total Operators 140.43 16216 IN." 1B&02 181.98 219.15 212T8 2 31 3510 Ur MTedl SeWmn 3.59 3.92 4.13 2.88 2.18 9.51 6.55 6.67 35M Compliance 29.58 U." 31.89 30.02 40.30 - - - 3530 Cons,Red,Reuse 51.87 76.98 71.36 W.20 08.03 - - - `e 3540 Alr Ovalay - 5.09 5.65 am ObI - - - 35W Envimnmenal Mgmt - - - - - 56.7/ 56.26 4421 - 35W Ubna" 21.78 33.13 38.07 44.06 WAS 41.32 4028 37M 35W Source Cmbm 9.01 14.82 8.1] 11.]5 9A6 8.83 8.70 428 Total Tech Srrrvkn 116.03 196.38 189.26 106.11 163.16 116,112 110.87 92A - 3110 Dlrel Ergr 1.45 4.54 0.72 0.55 0.88 1.45 1A9 1.12 T20 Plennhg&Design(Design®95-95) 5.01 7.89 2.64 1.18 3.10 2.81 1.10 3.98 ~' 37W Englneedng Planning - - - - - On - 1.28 Use Inat&Conhols - 1.97 - - - - - - 37W Comb Mgml 5.59 8.06 2.89 3.51 3.04 4,17 3,43 3.96 r Tmal EnglnmHng 1204 2126 624 5.82 7.10 9.05 6.62 10.33 Total Expenses N1.10 682A8 572.111 6r8.74 575.73 611.14 84298 596.98 Lean Revenues (21.01) (43.03) (M.51) (42.93) ImU) (43.84) (43.84) (44.13) Net JOExpenees 425.19 619A8 0831 05,81 621.19 62].30 599.13 W280 d Section 2-Page 3 L 1996-96 3rd Quarter Report Summary of Expenses by Major Category For The Nine Months Ended 3131196 u Exle. Fxp. Incr. Iner. Percent Budget Thru Thru (Deer.) (Deer.) Budget Remaining 1995A6 3131196 3/31195 $ % Realized Budget v Net Salaries,Wages&Benefits 28,687,000 20,501,838 19,043,525 1,458,313 7.66% 71.52% 8,166,162 W Odor Control&Chemical Coagulants 5,363.500 2.966,382 2,832,745 133,637 4.72% 55.31% 2,397,118 Contractual Services 7,269,500 5,393,661 6.209,698 183,965 3.53% 74.20% 1,875,839 I M.r Professional Services 1,512,600 995,363 1,107,974 (112,611) -10.16% 65.80% 517,237 Equipment Charges 235.700 138,840 127.557 11,283 8.85% 58.91% 96,860 ~ Repair&Maint.,Materials&Services 4,209.900 2.387,601 2,453,983 (66,382) -2.71% 66.71% 1,822,299 sw Research&Monitoring 3.095,000 1,688,571 2,044,127 (355,556) -17.39% 54.56% 1,406,429 Utilities 3,375,500 1,760,276 2,121,135 (360,859) .17.01% 52.15% 1,816,224 Lr Other Materials,Supplies &Outside Services 4,461,300 3,015.882 2,512,974 502.908 20,01% 67.75% 1,435,418 'L Total Joint Operating Expenses 58,180,000 38,848.414 37.453,716 1,394.698 3.72% 66.77% 19,331,586 Revenues&Offsets (3,800,000) (2,871,955) (2,945,945) 73,990 -2.51% 75.58% (928,045) Net Joint Operating Expense 54,380,000 35,976,459 34,507,771 1,468,688 4.26% 66.16% 18,403,541 W Gallonage Flow(MG) 86.688.61 65,075.42 67,008.31 (1,931) -2.88% 75.07% 21,613 Gallonage Flow(MGD) 236.85 353.67 364.16 (10.49) -2.88% y Gallonage Charge($s/MG) 627.30 552.84 514.99 37.85 7.35% a.' 6d V t✓ Section 2-Page 4 J. 0. 81 W. C. Budget Review Summary of Expenses by Line Item For The Nine Months Ended March 31, 1996 EXP EXP EXP INCR INCR BUDGET THRU THIRD REMAINING THRU (DECR) IDECR) Description 1995-96 3131196 3/31196 BUDGET 3131/96 S % Salaries.Waaea.8 Benefits Salaries B Wages 32,283,000 22,353,326 69.24 9,929,674 21.451,820 901,5D6 4.20 Employee Benefits: Relimment 3,077,000 2,253,163 73.23 823,837 1,645,440 607,723 36.93 Workers Comp 225,000 164,423 73.D8 60,577 173,077 (8,654) (5.00) Unemployment Ins 75,000 25,013 33.35 49,987 28,125 (3,112) (11.06) Group Insurance 4,207,000 2,742,616 65.19 1,464,384 2,714,445 25,171 1.04 -- Uniform Rental 100,000 42,475 42.48 57,525 51,235 (8,760) (17.10) e Total Benefits 7,684,000 5.227,690 68.03 2,456,310 4,612,322 615,368 13.34 Salaries,Wages,6 Benefits 39,967,000 27,581,016 69.01 12,385.984 26,064.142 1,516,874 5.82 m W.O.Salaries 8 Ben.Alice. Direct Charges-Cod (6,875,000) (4,492,692) 65.35 (2,382,308) (4,450,103) (42,589) 0.96 e Cost Alloo-Cor6Dist (4,425,000) (2,586,486) 58.45 (1,838,514) (2,570,514) (15.972) 0.62 W.O.Salaries S Denville (11,300,OOD) (7,079,178) 62.65 (4,220,822) (7,020,617) (58,561) 0.83 Not J.O.Payroll 28,667,000 20,501,838 71.52 8,165,162 19,043,525 1,458,313 7.66 Meg,Supply,S Services Gasoline,Dlesel8Oil 175,000 118,029 68.02 55,971 135,578 (18,549) (12.21) Insurance 1,250,000 1.089.540 87.16 160.460 929,703 159,837 17.19 Memberships 58,000 55,305 95.35 2,695 54,503 802 1.47 rd Office Exp-Supplies 203,100 96,855 47.69 106,245 72,141 24,714 34.26 Office Automation 157,500 132,761 84.29 24.739 68,490 64,271 93.84 Minor Furniture,Fixtures, - - NIA - - WA b1 Other 102,300 76,618 74.90 25.682 64,731 11,887 15.36 Operating Supplies Odor Control 2,103.500 1.116,232 53.07 987,268 860,352 255,850 29.74 Sulfide Control 1,715,OOD 1,163,622 67.85 551.378 1,118,919 44,703 4.D0 Chemical Coagulants 1,545,00D 686.528 44.44 858,472 853,474 (166,946) (19,56) _ Lab Chemicals 8 Supplies 509,000 251,936 49.50 257,064 271,283 (19,347) (7.13) Tools 125,400 81.071 64.65 44,329 52,786 28,285 53.58 ,d Soly,Paints,S Jan.Supplies 146,000 84,082 57.59 61,918 98,534 (14,452) (14.67) Other Operating Supplies 207,500 152,774 73.63 54,728 125,713 27,061 21.53 Contractual Services Groundskeeping B Janitorial 213,000 49,937 23.44 163,063 88.134 (38,197) (43.34) _ Outside Lab Services 150,000 41,285 27.52 108,715 29,999 11,286 37.62 Solids Removal 5,425.000 4,099,459 75.57 1,325,541 4,276,149 (176,690) (4.13) Other Waste Disposal 140.000 84,555 60.40 55,445 49,256 35,299 71.66 Oxygen Plant Oper 510.000 359,004 70.39 150,996 331.445 27,559 8.31 Other 831,500 530,421 63.79 301,079 434,713 95,708 22.02 Section 2-Page 5 L 1995-96 - 3rd Quarter Report Summary of Expenses by Line Item 6' For The Nine Months Ended March 31, 1996 I % % EXP EXP EXP [NCR EXP BUDGET THRU THRU REMAINING THRU (DECR) THRU DESCRIPTION 1996.96 3131196 3131/96 BUDGET 3131tIM 6 % V Professional Services Legal 600,000 459,146 76.52 140,854 522,112 (62,W6) (12.06) Audit&Accounting 70,000 27.618 39.45 42.382 67,953 (40.335) (59.36) Engineering 289,000 118,488 41.00 170.512 31,955 86,533 270.80 V Other 553,600 390,111 70.47 163,489 485,954 (95,843) (19.72) Printing&Publication Repro-In-House 219,100 182,838 83.45 36,262 169,136 13,702 8.10 Printing-Outside 80,500 30,267 50.03 30,233 10,147 20,120 188.29 Photo Processing 32,700 22,092 67.56 10,608 15,425 6,667 43.22 Notices&Ads 29,500 37,115 125.81 (7,615) 19,135 17,980 93.96 i W Rants&Lessee Outside Equip Rental 109,000 64,722 59.38 44,278 60,379 4,343 7.19 District Equip Rental 126,700 74,118 58.50 52,582 67,178 6,940 10.33 Repaint&Maintenance W Materials&Services 3,375,900 1,846,674 54.70 1,529,226 2,090,853 (244,179) (11.68) Contracts 834,000 540,927 64.86 293,073 363,130 177,797 48.96 Research&Monitoring Let Enviro Monitoring 2,375,000 1,630,299 68.64 744,701 1,653.921 (23.622) (1.43) Air Quality Monitoring 155,000 650 0,42 154,350 75,000 (74,350) (99.13) Research 565.000 286,622 5D.73 278,378 315,206 (28,584) (9.07) IW Travel,Meetings&Training Meetings 134,000 127,301 95.06 6,619 132,908 (5,527) (4.16) Training 513,500 233,053 45.39 280,447 - 233,053 N/A Uncelectable Accounts 15,000 171 1.14 14,629 - 171 NIA utilities Diesel For Generators 25,000 - 0.00 25,000 5,964 (5,964) (100.00) Power 1,015,000 575,021 53.49 499,979 585,274 (10,253) (1.75) Natural Gas 1,400,000 713,263 50.95 686,737 688,216 25,047 3.64 Telephone 125,50D 113.265 90.25 12,235 89,024 24,241 27.23 Water 750,000 358,727 47.83 391,273 752,657 (393,930) (52.34) V Other Expenses Freight 79,700 42,062 52.80 37,618 46,396 (4,314) (9.30) General&Safety 539,000 198,150 36.76 340,850 339,507 (141,357) (41.64) Aqmd Operating Fees 250,000 124,090 49.64 125,910 98,550 25,540 25.92 sr Prior Years Expense 20,000 - 0.00 20,000 86,885 (86.865) (100.00) Other Non-0per Expense 94,500 39.929 42.25 54,571 61,726 (21,797) (35.31) Net J.O.-Mass,Supp,&Sam. 29,983,000 18,507,833 61.73 11,475,167E453 (242,641) (1.29) W Cost Alloc-Cori&Other (470.000) (161,257) 34.31 (308,743) 179,026 (52.61) Net J.O..Matis,Supp,&Serv. 29,513,000 16,346,576 62.16 11,166,424 (63,615) (0.35)Total J.O.Requirements 58.180,000 38,848,414 66.77 19,331,586 1,394,698 3.72 W Less:: Revenue (3,810,000) (2,895.251) 75.99 (914,749) (2,958,709) 63,458 (2.14) Cost Allocation -CORF, Dists,&Other 10,000 23,296 232.96 (13,296) 12,764 10,532 82.51 W Net Revenue (3,800,000) (2,871,955) 75.58 (928,045) (2,945,945) 73,990 (2.51) Net J.O.Expenditures 54,380,000 35,976,459 68.16 18,403,541 34,507,771 1,46B,6BB 4.26 W Section 2-Page 8 J. O. & W. C. Budget Review Summary of Joint Operating Revenues by Line Item For The Nine Months Ended March 31, 1996 REV REV REV INCR INCR BUDGET THRU THRU REMAINING THRU (DECK) (DECR) DESCRIPTION 1995.96 3/31196 3131196 BUDGET 3131195 $ % - INTER DIST SEWER USE 1,450,000 1,362,298 93.95 87,702 1,097,931 264,367 24.08 WASTEHAULER 500,000 225,933 45.19 274,067 296,232 (70.299) (23.73) IRWD SLUDGE DISPOSA 650,000 519,993 80.00 130,007 372,919 147,074 39.44 _ WASTE HAULER PENAL - - N/A - - WA SCRAP SALES 10,000 13,877 138.77 (3,877) 47,384 (33,507) (70.71) o OTHER SALES 5,000 1,430 28.60 3,570 974 456 46.82 SIOSOUDS REUSE 10,000 - - 10,000 6,722 (6,722) (100.00) RENTS & LEASES 70,000 73,201 104.57 (3,201) 51,250 21.951 42.83 CONTRIBUTION IN AID - - WA - - WA GENERAL NON-OPERATI 100,000 71,693 71.69 28,307 56,791 14,902 26.24 -- VEHICLE & EQUIP 200,000 141,086 70.64 58.914 141,694 (608) (0.43) MAILING FEE 5,000 170 3.40 4,830 180 (10) (5.56) SAMPLING CHARGES 250,000 189,656 75.86 60,344 202,781 (13,125) (6.47) - . PRIOR YEAR INCOME 50,000 - - 50,000 375,953 (375,953) (100.00) POWER SALES 500,000 272,618 54.52 227.382 295,134 (22,516) (7.63) TOTALJO REVENUES 3,800,000 2.871.955 75.58 928,045 2,945,945 (73,990) (2.51) b m - Section 2-Page 7 d V 1995-96 - 3rd Quartrer Report Comparisons of Expenses by Department it For The Nine Months Ended March 31, 1996 1995.96 1993-94 1994-95 1994.95 Adopted Year to Date Budget% L Department and Division Actual Budget Actual Budget 3131198 Reamed General Managers Department b, Executive Management 669,751 1,009,3D0 1,410,640 763,700 669,302 87.64% Board Secretary 70,207 208.000 58.560 143,600 84,259 58.68% Management Support - - - 54,700 14,760 26.98% Communicetions 238,966 441,600 218,598 676,400 346,262 51.19% Total 878,924 1.658.900 1,687.798 1,638.400 1,114,583 68.03% Human Resources Department Human Resources Administration 758,065 1,126,600 1,042,149 299,000 262379 87.75% Human Resources&Training - - - 512,800 362:133 70.82% Safety&Emergency Response 611,200 499,805 81.77% Total 758,055 1.126.500 1,042.149 1,423,000 1,124,317 79.01% Finance Department W Finance Administration 1,420.950 1,413,800 1,610,739 1,549,000 1,345.651 86.87% Accounting 555.449 815,600 817,505 1.042,800 698,765 67.01% Purchasing&Warehousing 506,788 647,400 546,640 760,500 484.239 63.67% y Total 2,483.187 2,876,800 2,874,885 3,352,300 2,528,655 75.43% Information Technology Department Into Tech Administration 1,146.921 1,699,300 1,251,701 266.100 141418 53.14% 60 Hardware Support - - - 643,250 532:554 82.79% Software&Plant Automation Support 642.250 845,720 131.68% Total 1,146,921 1,699,300 1,261,701 1,551,600 1,519,692 97.94% Maintenance Department Maintenance Administration 832,102 1,107,100 1,083,020 266,000 324,295 122.38% Maintenance Scheduling - - 496.400 356,188 71.75% Plant Maintenance 3,290,595 3,458,100 3,197,821 3,261.300 2,414,570 74.04% Collection Facilities Maintenance 299.426 365,900 249.469 342.300 295,929 86.45% Mechanical Maintenance 4,898.622 5,574,700 5,192,640 5,816,600 3,485,037 59.92% Electrical Maintenance 1,767.675 1,902.300 1,856,601 1,964.000 1.291.272 65.75% I Instrumentation Maintenance 2,346.636 2,713,800 2,581,127 2975100 1807661 60.76% LI Total 13.436,058 15,121,900 14,160.678 15:120:700 9:974:952 65.97% Operations Department Operations Administration - - - 1,241.700 1.025.442 82.58% 6.1 Plant Operations 15,601,211 15,840,800 14,862,879 22,957,600 14,873,175 64.79% Total 15,601,211 15,840,800 14,862,879 24,199,300 15,898,617 65.70% 1 Technical Services Department W Technical Services Administration 243,052 256,200 193,053 833,100 427,817 51.35% Environmental Management 9,057,D47 10,533,300 10,163,160 4,921,400 2,877,213 68.46% Environmental Sciences Lab 3,715.233 3,471,950 3,241,725 3,581,600 2,425,300 67.72% Source Control 991.029 276,750 839,942 773,700 284,757 36.80% 1019 Total 14,006,361 14,638,200 14,437,870 10,109,800 6,015,087 59.50% Engineering Department Engineering Administration 46,212 56,000 78,229 125,400 72,799 58.05% y Design Engineering 148,366 221,000 281,346 243,800 258,833 106.17% Engineering Planning - - - 54,200 83,195 163.50% Construction Management 296.125 102.600 268,956 361,50D 257,684 71.28% Total 490,703 379,60D 628,531 784,900 672,511 85.68% V Less Joint Operating Revenues (3,620,154) (3.700,000) (4,649,515) (3.800,000) (2,871,955) 75.58% Net Joint Operating Expenses 45,180,264 49.542,000 4 2296,976 54,380,000 35,976.459 86d6% Section 2-Page 8 y J.O. & W.C. Budget Review r Total Flows -Year-To-Date For The Nine Months Ended 3131/96 r - 68,000 r 67,000 __________________s_________ ________________-____--____ __________________ e „ C O 65,000 — __________________r__________________r_-________ _______r__________________ A su � O E w 61,000 Msr-92 ma O Mar-94 Mar-95 Merv98 Nine Months Ended w - - Section 2 - Page 9 i 1995-96 3rd Quarter Report LJ Staffing Trends For The Nine Months Ended 3131196 710 L 670 L ♦ � r m m m T 650 E m E 630 ' r IL 570 6/30192 Gram a0w Gram 3131M ff Ym tAuOarized —*—Actual I W L v i..t i, IId L L Section 2-page 10 V r r r r r SECTION 3. r CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND REVIEW r r r r. r r r r r r r r CORF Review Capital Improvement Program For The Nine Months Ended 3131196 Plant 1 v� $5,991,000 43% Plant 2 $2,336,000 9% d Water Reclamation $104.000 1% Consl.in Progress Interplant 8 Joint Facilities _ $153.000 $3,731,000 u % 25% Equipment Special Projects $1,350,000 8 Studies 11% $203.000 ® 1% Total Capital Improvement Expenditures - $13,876,000 District No.2 $2,452,000 District No.3 29.43% $2.524,000 30.46 Distnd No. 1 $810,aD0 9.83.% )No6 ct No.5 98.000 e Distnct Na. 14 D .61% $523,000 Distnd No. 13 Dislrid No.11 Distnd No.7 $394,000 -- 6.31% $80,000 $519,000 $687.000 4,69% m 0.96% 6.32% 8.39% Total Capital Improvement Funding - $13,876,000 Section 3-Page 1 L FY 1995-96 3rd Quarter Report Summary of Joint Works Contruction Requirements -Current Year For the Nine Months Ended 3131196 199556 1996.98 y 1995.96 Actual Remaining Projected Budget ag 3/31196 Budget Outlay A.Reclamation Plant 1 New and Rebudgeted Major Projects: 1.Electrification of Pump Drives, P1-36-1 50,000 469,702 (419,702) 509,702 2.Secondary Treatment Expansion to 90 MGD,P1-36-2 6,335,000 4,372.796 1,962,204 8,572,796 Value Engineering for Secondary Treatment, P1-36-2 165,000 7,330 157,870 7,330 3.Primary Treatment 72 MGD Expansion, Pt-37 164,626 6,305 159,321 5,305 Compressed Natural Gas Refueling Station,Pi-51 835,374 24,930 810444 24,930 4.Security S Landscaping,P1-38-1 10,000 87,322 (77:322) 92,322 5.Misc.Mods.Priority Elements P1-38-2 10,000 263,322 (253.322) 273,322 6.Misc.Modifications to Plant 1,Pi-38-4 50,000 310,461 (260,461) 315,461 7.Fire Protection,Signs and Water Sys Mods.,P1-3M 900,000 30,044 869,056 530,044 8. Electl. Facility Modifns&Safety Upgrades,Pt-40-1 - 2,885 (2,885) 12,885 9.Fac Modi&Safety Upgrades, P140-2 500,000 27,2a2 472,718 42,282 10.Prim Clarifiers 3,4&5 Rehab. P141 1,000,000 63,412 936.588 463,412 11.Seimic Retrofit of Non-Structure Systems,P143 - 2,785 (2,785) 12785 12.Seismic Retrofit Stmclual Items,P144-1,2,3 100,000 48,750 51,250 123:750 13.Chemical and Waslehauler Facility Modifns, P146-2,3 - 11,092 (11,092) 61,092 14. 12KV Distribution System for Support Facilities,Pl47 400,000 13,192 388,808 33,192 15.Misc Architectural&Treatment Pit Imprvmts,P148 360,968 13,138 347,830 13,138 V Information Technologies Trailer Conplex,Pl48-1 39,032 39,032 62,170 23.Miscellaneous Special Projects Pint. 1, Pl49 50,000 - 50,000 - 24.Misc.Job Plan Projects (See Schedule C) 500,000 197.999 302,001 247.999 v Sub Total -Reclamation Plant l 11,470,000 5,990,779 5,479.221 11,403,917 B.Plant 2 New and Rebudgeted Major Projects: 1.Support Facilities and Site Improvements a.Operations Building,P2-23-5-1 350,000 91,868 258,132 101.868 b.Warehouse Building, P2.35.2 959.000 25,865 933135 25,865 '1 Renovation of Existing VJhse, P2-23-5-2R 441,000 730 440:270 736 W c Maintenance Building ,P2-35-3 1.400,000 82,770 1,317,230 582,770 d. Phase II Site&Security Imp.,P2-35-5 - 1,629 (1,629) 26,629 e.Construction Management Office,M-D44(P2.354) 250,000 226,543 23457 231543 2.Rehab 7 Digesters, P2-39-1,2,3 250,000 99,060 150:940 149:060 V 3. Primary Treatment 24 MGD Expansion,P241 - 859 (859) 859 4.Secondary Treatment Expansion, P242-2 1,400,000 1,213.871 186,129 1,318,871 5.Priority Misc.Mod. , P243-1 50,000 72,142 (22142) 122,142 ! 6.Misc.Modifications,P243-3 10.000 85.796 (75:796) 87,796 W 7.Plant 2 Influent Diversion 200,000 - 200,000 - 8.Fire Protection, Signs&Water Sys Modifns,P246 1,900,000 40,304 1,859.696 540,304 9.Elech Fac Modifns&Safety Upgrades,P247-1 - 22,056 (22,056) 32,056 I 10.Fac Modifns&Safety Upgrades,P247-2 500,000 38,058 461,942 48.058 ed 11.Primary Clarifier Rehab. P248 500,000 54,269 445,731 254,269 12.Seimic Retrofit of Non-Structure Systems,P2-50 - 15,269 (15,269) 315,269 13.Seismic Retrofit,Structural Items P2-53-2,3,4,5,6 50,000 93,234 (43,234) 143,234 14.Chemical and Plant Water Modifns, P2-55 1,400,000 55,090 1.344,910 355,090 W 15.Misc Seismic Modifns&Flare Improvements,P2-56 250,000 1,671 248,329 2,671 16.Miscellaneous Projects Special Projects Plant 2 50,000 - 50,000 20.Reclaimed Water System Pint.2 75,000 - 75,000 5,000 L 21.Misc.Job Plan Projects (See Schedule D) 500,000 114,549 385,451 189,549 Sub-Total -Treatment Plant 2 10,535,000 2,335,633 8,199,367 4.533,633 V Section 3-Page 2 4 CORF Review m Summary of Joint Works Contruction Requirements - Current Year For the Nine Months Ended 3131196 m 1995.96 1995-96 1995.96 Actual Remaining Projected -- Budget 03131196 Budget Outlay C.Water Reclamation Regional Expansion: ". Redmation Plant No. 1 Water Quality Management Study 153 153 - 153 OCSD/OCWD Regional Water Reclamation Plant Study 99,847 103,683 (3,836) 108,683 d Sub-Total- Water Reclamation Regional Expansion 100.000 103.838 (3.838) 108.838 D.Interplant and Joint Facilities '® 1. Support Facilities and Site Improvements a. Demolition of Old Lab for Offices,J-11-1 195,39D 18,646 176,744 18,646 - - Interior Asbestos Removal from Old Lab,J-11-1A 4,610 4,610 - 54,610 b.Central Lab Expansion J-17-3 90,233 4,224 86.009 6,224 Yd Purch&Intl of Racks to Secure Gas Cylinders&Dewars 27,467 1,713 25.764 1,713 _ Office Reconfigurated for Emiom Mgmt Area 42,300 - 42,300 - 2.Outfall&Swatter Pump Stations a.Surge Tower Replacement,J-34-1 1,185,000 23,270 1,161,730 33,270 3.Computerized Fee.Records and Owg.Sys.J-25-1 419,399 195,388 224,011 215,388 New Safety Division Offices,J41-1 80,100 7,674 72,426 7,674 Restoration of OLd Laboratory for H. R. Dept,J-11-2 601 501 - 501 ,G 4. Electi. Power Systems Rehab.Studies J-25-2,3&4 200,000 73,938 126,062 128,938 5. Plants 1&2 Monitor/Control Sys, J-31-1,2,3,4,5 1,600.666 1,895,842 (295,176) 2,120,842 SCADA Retrofit Hardware Platform at Pits 1 &2 273,734 273,734 - 323,734 Power Bldg#1 Air Conditioning&Modifn for J-31 25,600 - 25.600 - .d 6. Standby Power Reliability Modifns,J-33-1,2 1,050,000 229,228 820,772 284,228 8, Biosolids Disposal Projects b. Land Acquisition - 431,536 (431.635) 531,535 9.. District Information Management Network �-, a.Maint.&Oper Mgmnt Computer System 100,000 - 100,000 - b.Lab Information Management System Upgrades 116,169 - 116,169 - - c. Financial Information System 600,000 90,208 509,792 110,208 d.Network System Integration 237,300 16,144 221,156 36,000 r Network Integration Consulting 42,700 14,484 28,216 14,484 Replace Fuel System Control 60,000 - 60,000 - e.CD-Optical Data Archiving 50,000 - 50,000 - 10. In-Plant Sampling System Modifn 69,740 - 69,740 - Final Sampler System Upgrades 30,260 18,867 11,393 18,867 11.Improvements to Central Generation 257,800 - 257,800 - " " Boiler Chemical Dosing System 2,800 13,035 (11,135) 13,936 Piping Insulation Addition 4,800 332 4,468 332 Steam System Modifn 34,800 - 34,600 - _ 12. Cable Tray Improvements 100,000 - 100.000 - 13. Misc Job Plan Projects (See Schedule E) 500,00D 417,063 82.937 517.083 d Transfer from D.Items 10 a&b Projects Above 8.831 8,831 - _ Sub-Total -Interplant&Joint 7,410,000 3,731,336 3,678,664 4,437,192 c, Sub Total -Major Projects 29,515,000 12.161.584 17.353.416 20,483,578 Section 3-Page 3 e Li FY 1995-96 3rd Quarter Report Summary of Joint Works Contruction Requirements - Current Year For the Nine Months Ended 3/31196 1995-96 1995.96 1 1995-96 Actual Remaining Projected Budget (rD 3/31196 Budget Outlay E.Special Projects, Studies & Research 1.Master Planning Issues a.Pere/Admin.Support Fac @ Pit 1 J-26,J-30 8,833 2,024 6,809 2,024 Distdcts'Office Space Utilization Study,J-38-1 66,167 66,167 - 118,000 b.Peak Hydraulic Discharge/Oudall Studies 347,439 - 347,439 152561 Determination of Peek Hydraulic Discharge 52,561 52,561 - 52:6111 c.Coll,Trtmnt&Disp Fat.Strategic Study 200,000 - 200,000 - d. NPOES Permit Support 100,000 48,546 51,454 73,546 2.Air Quality Control Program a.Toxics and ROG Control:Blotrickling fitter R 8 D 90,000 33,830 56,170 33,830 a+ b.Air Emissions:Source Control Feasibility Study/Metal 25,000 - 25,000 - c.Air Quality Management Implementation Plan d. Biofilter for Pump Stations 25,000 - 25.000 e.A.Q. Database Development 25,000 25,000 - V I. Central Gen Parameter Monitoring 75,000 75,000 - I Sub-Total-Special Projects 1,015,000 203,128 811,872 432,522 � F.Equipment Items 3.000,000 1,357,505 1,642,495 1,657,505 , Sub-Total-Joint Works Capital Requirements 33,530,000 13,722,217 19,807,783 22,573,605 V Construction In Progress-Completed At 6130195 153,187 (153,187) Total Joint Works Capital Requirements 33,530,000 13,875,404 19,654,596 22,573,605 60 I tr L I V laf AJ Section 3-Page 4 CORF Review Summary of Joint Works Construction Requirement-Project Life For The Nine Months Ended 3131/96 ® Current Total Total W30195 Year Projected Estimated -- Estimated Accumulated Projected Cost at Future Cost Cost Coat W30196 Cost A.Reclamation Plant l New and Rebudgetad Major Projects: 1.Electrification of Pump Drives,Pl-36-1 1,700,000 1,066,911 509,702 1,576,613 123,387 2.Secondary Treatment Expansion to 80 MGD,Pl-36 46,835,000 118,137 8.572,796 8,690,933 38,144,DS7 Value Engineering for Secondary Treatment,P1-3 165,000 - 7,330 7,330 157,670 3.Primary Treatment 72 MGD Expansion,P137 37,289,626 166,613 5,305 171,918 37,117,70E Compressed Natural Gas Refueling Station,P1-51 835,374 24,930 24,930 810,444 4.Security&Landscaping,P138-1 1,510,000 1,573.145 92,322 1,665,467 (155.467) 5.Misc. Mods. Priority Elements Pl-38-2 4,810,01K) 5,007.980 273,322 5,281,302 (471,302) 6. Misc. Modifications to Plant 1,Pl38A 2.550,000 1,927,039 315,461 2,242,500 307,500 - - 7.Fire Protection,Signs and Water Sys Mods.,P138- 3,060,000 463,663 530,044 993,707 2,066,293 8.Elecll. Facility Modifns&Safety Upgredes,P1.4G-1 6,625,000 133.378 12,885 146.263 8,478,737 9.Fac Modifns&Safety Upgrades, P140-2 2,025,000 288,370 42,282 330,652 1,694,348 10. Prim Clarifiers 3,4&5 Rehab. P141 2,350,000 251,454 463,412 714,866 1,635,134 11.Seimic Retrofit of Non-Structure Systems, P143 4.250,000 117,194 12,785 129,979 4,120,021 12.Seismic Retrofit Struclual Items, P1441,2,3 4,260,000 922,135 123,750 1,045,885 3,204,115 13.Chemical and Wastehauler Facility Modifns,P146- 3.020,000 401,018 61,092 462,110 2,557,890 ._ 14. 12KV Distribution System for Support Facilities,P1- 2.650,000 141,956 33,192 175,148 2,474,862 15.Misc Architectural&Treatment Pit Imprimis,Pl48 435,000 107,345 13,138 120,483 314,517 d information Technologies Trailer Conplex,P148-1 400,000 - 62,170 62,170 337,830 16.40 MGD Oxygen Activated Sludge&DAPs 65,463,000 - - - 65,463,000 17.Bell Presses(4 Units) 14.300.000 - - - 14,300,000 18.Solids Storage(4 Bins) 10.177.000 - - - 10,177,000 19.Digesters: 2 @ 111Y Diameter 9,100,000 - - - 9,100,000 20. 12kv Electrical Power Distribution 2,477,000 - - - 2,477,000 21.Emergency Sewage Bypass System 1,922,000 - - - 1,922,000 22.Remove Trickling Filters 1 &3 1,300,000 - 1,300,000 e 23.Miscellaneous Special Projects Pint 1, Pl49 4.385,000 - - - 4,386,000 _ 24.Mist Job Plan Projects (See Schedule C) 22.125,000 66,054 247,999 314,053 21,810,947 25.Other Master Plan Projects .. a.Headworks No. 1 Rebuild,2003 14,950,000 - - 14,950,000 b.Headworks No.2 Impeller/Pump Speed,2016 2,600,000 - - - 2,600,000 a Remove Trickling Filters 2&4,2007 1,300.000 - - - 1,300,000 d.40 Mgd Oxygen Act'd Sludge&DAF,2017 34,000.000 - - - 34,000,000 e. 1 VY It Digesters,2003&2012 18,200,000 - - - 18,200,000 f.4 Belt Presses,2004 10,920,000 - - - 10,920,000 g. 12 KV Power Distribution,2001-2012 1,D99,000 - - - 1,099,000 h.Standby Power Generation,2005&2015 4,914,0D0 - - 4,914.000 m 1.72 Mgd Primary Treatment,2004&2012 32,500,000 - 32,500,000 _ Sub Total -Reclamation Plant l 378,492,000 12,752.392 11,403.917 24,156,309 354,335,691 B.Plant 2 New and Rebudgeted Major Projects: 1.Support Facilities and Site Improvements a.Operations Building, P2-23.5-1 3,550,000 3,398.576 101.868 3,500.444 49,556 - - b.Warehouse Building,P2-35.2 3,379,000 308,582 25,865 334.447 3,044,553 Renovation of Existing Whse,P2-23.8-2R 441,000 - 730 730 440,270 ,., c.Maintenance Building, P235-3 4,000,000 263,D64 582,T70 846,834 3,154,166 d.Phase II Site&Security Imp.,P2-35-5 2,475,000 176,309 26,629 202,938 2,272,062 e.Construction Management Office,M-044(P2-354) 690.000 277.094 231,543 508.637 181,363 2.Rehab 7 Digesters, P2.39-1,2,3 14,225,000 529,657 149,060 678.717 13.546.283 c, 3.Primary Treatment 24 MGD Expansion,P241 14,505,000 4,549 859 5,408 14,499.592 4.Secondary Treatment Expansion,P242-2 18,000,000 16,277,999 1.318,871 17.596,870 403,130 5.Priority Misc. Mod..P243-1 4,850,000 5,011.628 122,142 5.133,770 (283,770) 6.Misc.Modifications,P2433 2.510.000 2,640,696 87,796 2.728.492 (218,492) m, 7.Plant 2Influent Diversion 2,500,000 - - - 2,500,000 Section 3-Page 5 m L 1995-96 3rd Quarter Report Summary of Joint Works Construction Requirement- Project Life I V For The Nine Months Ended 3/31196 Current Total 1 Total 6130195 Year Projected Estimated Jam• Estimated Accumulated Projected Cost at Future Cost Cost cost 6130196 Cost B.Plant 2 New and Robudgeted Major Projects:(cont.) 8.Fire Protection, Signs&Water Sys Modllns,P2-46 4,615,000 440,101 540,304 980,405 3,634,595 W 9.Elect]Fac Modifns&Safety Upgrades,P247.1 3,450,000 113,362 32,056 145,418 3.304,582 10.Fec ModBns&Safety Upgrades, P247-2 4,015.000 290,452 48,058 338.610 3,676,490 11.Primary Clarifier Rehab. P248 6,800,000 474,753 254,269 729,022 6.070,978 12 Seimic Retrofit of Non-Structure Systems,P2-50 4,800,000 185,811 315,269 481,080 4,318,920 41 13.Seismic Retrofit,Structural Items P2-53-2,3,4,5,6 8,410,000 3,282,714 143,234 3,405,948 5,004,052 14.Chemical and Plant Water Moditns,P2-55 4.200,000 336,527 355,0W 690,617 3,509,383 15.Misc Seismic Modif is&Flare Improvements,P2-56 525.000 19,648 2,671 22,319 502,651 I 16.Miscellaneous Projects Special Projects Plant 2 4,550,000 - - 4.550,000 den 17.Solids Storage: 2 Bins 5,200,000 - - 5,200,000 18.Additional 105 Fool Digester 3,900,000 - - 3,900,000 19.Plant Water Pump Station 1.170,000 - - - 1,170,000 i 20.Reclaimed Water System Pint 2 4,820,000 5,D00 5,000 4,815,000 W 21.Misc.Job Plan Projects (See Schedule D) 22,250,000 103,950 189,549 293.499 21,956,501 22.O01er Master Plan Projects a.Replace Primary Basins A.B,C,2006 11,700,000 - 11,700,000 b.Standby Power Generation,2005&2015 10,000,000 - - - 10,000,000 c.Monitoring and Control System,2005 520,000 - 620.000 Sub-Total -Treatment Plant 172,050,000 34,129,352 4,533,633 38,662,985 133,387,015 C.Water Reclamation Regional Expansion 74,820,000 - - 74.820,000 1101 Recmation Plant No. 1 Water Quality Management 280.000 1.540 153 1,e93 278.307 OCSD/OCWD Regional Water Reclamation Plant S 400,000 148,837 108,683 257,620 142,480 Sub-Total- Water Reclamation Regional Expansl 75,500,000 150,377 108.e38 259,213 75,240,787 i 4 D.Interplant and Joint Facilities 1. Support Facilities and Site Improvements a.Demolition of Old Lab for Offices,J-11-1 76,800 27,858 18.646 46,504 30,296 Interior Asbestos Removal from Old Lab,J-11-1A 153,200 - 54,810 54,610 98.590 b. Central Lab Expansion J-17-3 840,233 - 6,224 6,224 834,009 Purch&Insti of Rocks to Secure Gas Cylinders 27,467 15,749 1,713 17,462 10,005 Office Reconfigureted for Enviom Mgmt Area 42,300 - - - 42,300 c.Demolition or Reuse of Old Control Center 245,0110 - - 245,000 d.Demolition of Support Bldg.®Pt2,J-27 190,0D0 109.504 - 1D9,504 80,496 2. Outfall&Booster Pump Stations a.Surge Tower Replacement,J-34-1 6,500,000 768,699 33,270 801,989 5698031 b.Oufrall Reliability&Pumping Annex Does"C"J.3 31,085,000 - - - 31:085:000 c.Exl&Rapt 78"to Deep Water w/120"Outfall 92.050.000 - - 92,050,000 3.Computerized Fec Records and Dwg.Sys.J-25-1 4,254,900 209,406 215,388 424,794 3,Bm 108 New Safety Division Offices,J41-1 80,100 - 7,674 7,674 72,426 Restoration of OLd Laboratory for H. R. Dept,J-1 375,000 - 501 501 374,499 4.Elec0.Power Systems Rehab.Studies J-25-2,3&4 1.225,000 14,981 128,938 143.899 1,081,101 S.Plants 1&2 Monitor/Control Sys, J.31-1,2,3,4,5 8.824.400 2,127,616 2,120,842 4,248,458 4675942 SCADA Retrofit Hardware Platform at Pits 1 &2 2,200,000 423,684 323,734 747,418 1:452:582 Power Bldg#1 Air Conditioning&Modifn for J-31 25.600 - - - 25,600 6.Standby Power Reliability Modfns,J•33.1,2 14,575,000 445.593 254,228 729,821 13,845,179 7.Bushard Interplant Trunk Replacement 31,000,DD0 - - 31,000,000 8.Biosolids Disposal Projects a.Compost Demonstration Plant 9.000.000 - - - 9,000,000 W b. Land Acquisition 22.000.000 - 531,535 531.535 21,468,465 c. Landfill Development Phase I 28,600,000 - - - 28600000 00 , d.Compost Facility 50,D ,000 - - - 60:000:000 L e. Biosolids Disp.Landfill Phase It 2011 15,60D,000 - - - 15,600,000 f. Biosolids Disp. Equip Phase I&112001 11,600,000 - - - 11,500,000 g. Electrical Power Distribution, 12kv 2,707,000 - - - 2,707,000 U Section 3-Page 6 L CORF Review Summary of Joint Works Construction Requirement-Project Life For The Nine Months Ended 3/31196 e Current Total - Total W30195 Year Projected Estimated Estimated Accumulated Projected Cost at Future w Cost Cost Cost 9130196 Coat D.Interplant and Joint Facilities(cont.) 9..District Information Management Network a.Maim.B Oper Mgmnt Computer System 1,050,000 896,593 - 896,593 163,407 u b.Lab Information Management System Upgrades 505,000 47,773 - 47,773 457,227 c. Financial Information System 970.000 209,073 110,208 319,281 650,719 - d.Network System Integration 717,300 1,786 35,000 36,786 680,514 Network Integration Consulting 42,700 - 14,484 14,484 28,216 d Replace Fuel System Control 60,000 - - - 60,000 e.CD-Optical Data Archiving 125,000 - - - 126,000 10.In-Plant Sampling System Modifn 189,740 - - - 189.740 Final Sampler System Upgrades 30,260 447 18,867 19,314 10,946 m 11. Improvements to Central Generation 607,800 - - 607,800 Boller Chemical Dosing System 2,800 - 13,935 13,935 (11,135) Piping Insulation Addition 4,800 - 332 332 4,468 Steam System Modifn 34,600 - - - 34,600 12. Cable Tray Improvements 2,400,000 - - - 2,400,000 13, Mlsc Job Plan Projects (See Schedule E) 16,525,000 313,620 617,063 830,583 15,694,417 Sub-Total -Interplant&Joint 356,442,000 5,647.142 4.437,192 10,084,334 346,357,666 -- Sub Total -Major Projects 982,484,000 62,679,263 20,483,578 73,162,841 909,321,159 .y E.Special Projects,Studies&Research 1.Master Planning Issues - a.Pers(Admin.Support Fac @ Pit 1 J-26,J-30 96,520 274,935 2,024 276.959 (180,439) Districts'Office Space Utilization Study,J-38-1 201,480 - 118,000 116,000 83,480 b.Peek Hydraulic Discharge/Outfall Studies 1,699,000 - 152,561 162,561 1,546,439 Determination of Peak Hydraulic Discharge 1,151,000 - 52,581 52,561 1,098.439 c. Coll,Trtmnt&Disp Fac.Strategic Study 4,225,000 - - 4,225,000 d. NPDES Permit Support 1,175,000 427,445 73,546 500,991 674,009 2.Air Quality Control Program - - a.Taxies and ROG Control:Biotrickling filter R&D 440,000 304,697 33,830 338,627 101,473 - b.Air Emissions:Source Control Feasibility Study/Me 75,000 - - - 75,000 c.Air Quality Management Implementation Plan 150,000 21,640 - 21,640 128,360 m d. Biofilter for Pump Stations 50,000 - - - 50,000 e.AD. Database Development 75,000 - - 75,000 -- I.Central Gen Parameter Monitoring 350,000 3,519 3,519 346,481 Sub-Total•Special Projects 9,688,000 1,032,236 432,522 1,464,758 8,223,242 F.Equipment items 52,725,000 1,666,785 1,657,505 3,324,290 49,400,710 G Sub-Total-JoinlWorks Capital Requirements 1,044,897,000 55,378,284 22,573,605 77,951,889 966,945,111 Construction In Progress-Completed At 6130195 95,017,660 95,017,660 (95,017,660) r Total Joint Works Capital Requirements 1,044,697,000 150,395,941 22,573,605 172,969,549 871,927,451 Section 3-Page 7 m 1 �J This page was intentionally left blank }L LI L i ,Wyy LJ' 1� u Section 3-Page 8 !W U J �r SECTION 4. ii u BUDGET REVIEW BY DISTRICT J ;J s Budget Review by District All Districts Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review For The Nine Months Ended 3131196 Opgtatitlq_Oudget Review 1995-96 Year-To- Remaining Year-To-Date Budget Data Budget % Expended REVENUES: Tax Levy(No. 11 Bond Fund Only) 17,000 10,196 6,804 59.98% Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of 1%) 31,146,000 18.418,061 12,727,939 59.13% Federal and State Construction Grants - - - 0.00% Connection Fees 4,748,000 6,136,403 (1,388,403) 129.24% IRWD Fees 9,100,000 3,281,091 5,818,909 36.06% Other Fees 67,511.000 44,120,632 23,390,368 65.35% Sale of Capacity Rights 644,000 517,299 126,701 80.33% Interest&Misc. Receipts 15.799,000 17.722,706 (1,923,706) 112.18% Other 2,000 2.000 0.00% Total Revenues 128,967,000 90,208,388 38,760,612 69.95% OUTLAYS: Share of Joint Works Tani Plant 33,530,000 13,876,396 19,654,604 41.38% District Trunk Sewer Construction 13,420,000 10,303,746 3,116,252 76.78% COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 34,618,000 25,231,596 9.386,404 72.89% Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 54,380,000 35,976,459 18,403,641 66.16% District Operating&Other Expenditures 9,592,000 6,508,253 3,083,747 67.85% Total Outlays 145,540,000 91,895,452 53,644,548 63.14% ® Capital Facilities Budget Review Balance Adjustments Transferto Balance 711/95 &Additions Fixed Assets 913OMS CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: d, Districts 1-14 Construction in Progress 22,693,603 10.303,748 (13,859,848) 1911371505 Share of Joint Works 65,099,663 13,875,396 (2,772,708) 68,202,351 Sub-Total 77,793,266 24,179,144 (16,632,654) 85,339,856 COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT&EQUIP: Land and Property Rights 2,645,921 - - 2,645,921 Collection Lines and Pump Sins. 277,817,024 (504,803) 13,541,876 290,954,097 Treatment Facilities 19.922 - - 19.922 Disposal Facilities 101,528 - - 101,528 General Plant and Admin. Facil. 855.176 - 24,861 880,037 Equity in Joint Treatment Fact. 692,378,501 (6,006,833) 2,772,708 689,144,376 Other Assets at Cost Less Amon. 91,808 (95,794) 193,109 189,183 Sub-Total 973,909.940 (6,607,430) 16,632,554 983,935,054 Total Property, Plant&Equipment&CIP 1,051,703,206 17,571,714 1,089,274.920 — Section 4-Page 1 V 1995-96 3rd Quarter Report District 1 -Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review For The Nine Months Ended 3131196 1 Operating Budget Review L 1995-96 Year-To- Remaining Year-to-Date Budget Date Budget % Expended b REVENUES: Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Only) - - 0.00% Tax Allocations/Subventions(Sham of l%) 2,105,000 1,083,451 1,021,549 61.47% Federal and State Construction Grants - - - 0.00% Connection Fees 71,000 28,031 42,969 39.48% Other Fees 6,447,000 4.094,827 2,352.173 63.52% 6+ Sale of Capacity Rights 63,000 61,371 11,629 81.54% Interest&Misc. Receipts 925,000 1,280,848 (355,848) 138.47% 1 Other - - 0.00% W Total Revenues 9,611,000 6,538,528 3,072,472 68.03% OUTLAYS: L Share of Joint Works Trmt.Plant 3,279,000 1,365,259 1,913,741 41.64% District Trunk Sewer Construction 75,000 - 75,000 0.00% COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 4,289,000 3,243,740 1.045,260 75.63% ,aW Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 5,411,000 3,536,486 1,874,514 65.36% District Operating&Other Expenditures 587,000 425,689 161,311 72.52% Total Outlays 13,641,000 8,571,174 5,089,826 62.83% Capital Facilities Budget Review v Balance Adjustments Transferto Balance 711196 &Additions Fixed Assets 3131196 L CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: District No. 1 Projects Sub-Total Share of Joint Works 5,414.989 1.365,259 (272,557) 6,507,691 6d Sub-Total 5.414.989 1,366,259 (272.557) 6,507,691 COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT&EQUIP: Land and Property Rights 81,398 - - 81,398 Collection Lines and Pump Sms. 6,902,929 - - 6,902,929 Ii1 Treatment Facilities - - - - Disposal Facilities 11,593 - - 11.593 j General Plant and Admin. Fact. 58,241 - - 58,241 W Equity in Joint Treatment Facil. 69,566,209 (590,472) 272,557 69,248,294 Other Assets at Cost Less Amon. 1,424 (855) - 569 Sub-Total 76,621,794 (591,327) 272,557 76,303.024 Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 82.036,783 773,932 - 82,810,715 Lr Section 4-Page 2 LJ Budget Review by District p District No. 2 -Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review For The Nine Months Ended 3131/96 Operating Budget Review 1995-98 Year-To Remaining Year-To-Date Budget Date Budget %Expended REVENUES: Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Only) - - - 0.00% Tax Allocations/Subvenaons(Share of 1%) 9,515.000 5,639,917 3,875,083 59.27% ,. Federal and State Construction Grants - - - 0.00% Connection Fees 2,350,000 2,848,242 (498.242) 121.20% Other Fees 22,633,000 13.721,638 8,911,362 60.63% Sale of Capacity Rights 191,000 149,510 41,490 78,28% Interest Misc.Recelpts 4,655,000 5,108.329 (453,329) 109.74% Other 2,000 2,000 0.00% .e Total Revenues 39,346,000 27,467,636 11.878.364 69.81% OUTLAYS: -- Share of Joint Works Tant,Plant 9,921,000 4,119.125 5.801,875 41.52% District Trunk Sewer Construction 700,000 414,729 285,271 59.25% COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 11,392,000 8.565,771 2,826,229 75.19% Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 17,819,000 10,587,872 7,031,128 60.09% District Operating&Other Expenditures 2.202,000 1,812.366 389,634 82.31% ` Total Outlays 41,834,000 25,499,863 16,334.137 60.95% Capital Facilities Budget Review ` Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance 711195 &Additions Fixed Assets 3131196 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: 2-14-5R2 SARI Manhole 155,846 166,258 - 322,104 2-7A Atwood Subtrunk @ 91/57 Interchange 5,319 7.321 - 12,640 2-38 Olive Subtrunk&SAR Crossings for S.A.Widening 13,624 - 13,624 2-37 Miscellaneous Improvements to Pump Stations 325 3,115 - 3,440 2-36 Sewer Encasements for AT&SF Commuter Rail 64,648 115,608 (180,256) - 2-9-RI Cypress Ave.Subtrunk Sewer Rehab. 2,894.115 119,406 (3,013,507) 14 Misc Chgs to Closed Work Orders 6,184 2,364 - 8,548 2-35 Euclid Trunk B Interceptor 8,167 667 8,824 Sub-Total 3,148,228 414,729 (3,193,763) 369,194 �e Share of Joint Works 16,180,235 4,119,125 (816,008) 19,483,352 _ Sub-Total 19,328,463 4,533,854 (4,009,771) 19,852,546 COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT&EQUIP: r Land and Property Rights 517,694 - - 517,894 Collection Lines and Pump Sins. 93.701,134 - 3,193,763 96,894,897 Treatment Facilities - - - - ' Disposal Facilities 33,172 - - 33,172 .. General Plant and Admin.Facil. 215.420 - - 216,420 Equity in Joint Treatment Facil. 205,201.314 (1,767,811) 816,008 204,249,511 - Other Assets at Cost Less Amon. 60,100 (15,331) 44,769 _. Sub-Total 299,728.834 (1,783,142) 4,009,771 301,955,463 Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 319,057,297 2,750,712 321,808,009 r Section 4-Page 3 1995-96 3rd Quarter Report District No. 3-Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review For The Nine Months Ended 3131196 O ep rating Budget Review I 1995-96 Year-To- Remaining Year-To-Date L Budget Date Budget %Expended REVENUES: Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Only) - - - 0.00% all Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of 1%) 10,615,000 6,351,674 4,263,326 59.84% Federal and State Construction Grants - 1,599,06- - 0.00% 1 Connection Fees 1.410.000 6 (189.056) 113A1% L Other Fees 22,314,000 14,473,444 7.840.556 64.86% Sale of Capacity Rights 196,000 147.293 48,707 75.15% Interest&Misc.Receipts 5,070,000 5,665,506 (595,505) 111.75% I Other 0.00% L Total Revenues 39,605,000 28,236,973 11,368,027 71.30% OUTLAYS: Share of Joint Works Trmt Plant 10,213,000 4.149,699 6,063,301 40.63% V District Trunk Sewer Construction 5,288,000 3.417,916 1,870,084 64.64% COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 10.694,000 7.775,894 2.918.106 72.71% Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 16,664,000 10,958,429 5,605,571 66.16% District Operating&Other Expenditures 2,516,000 1,652,696 863,304 65.69% Total Outlays 45,275,000 27.954,634 17.320,366 81.74% Capital Facilities Budget Review V' Balance Adjustments Transferto Balance 711195 &Additions Fixed Assets 3131196 L CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: 3-25 Orange-Western Sub-Trunk Relief Sewer 56.609 - - 56,609 11-17 Slater PIS Upgrade-3&11 906,481 251,508 - 1159,969 3-36 Techite Pipe Replacement 1,563,292 357,127 - 1:820,419 rl 3-36R Repl.Westminster Ave. Force Mains 222,510 2.361,219 - 2,583,729 3-371-5 Widening Project 8,177 116 - 8,293 3-38 Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer Improvements 410,491 27,526 - 438,017 ' 3-38-1 Improv.to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer 2,420 1,300 - 3,720 3-38-21mprov.to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer 798,678 399,461 - 1,196,139 3-38-31mprov.to Miller-Holder Tmnk Sewer 4.780 12,358 - 17.138 3.39 Miller-Holder Easement 8.752 - - 8,752 6d Miscellaneous Charges to Closed W.O. 1.629 7.301 8,930 Sub-Total 3,983,819 3,417,916 7,401,735 Share of Joint Works 18,860,104 4,149,899 (844,567) 20,185,238 y Sub-Total 20,S43,923 7,567,615 (844,587) 27,566.971 COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIP: Land and Property Rights 280,231 - - 280,231 td Collection Lines and Pump Sins. 62.069,818 - - 62,089,818 Treatment Facilities 9,922 - - 9,922 j Disposal Facilities 28,419 - - 28,419 W General Plant and Admin.Facil. 317,991 - - 317,991 Equity in Joint Tmabnent Facil. 211,213,109 (1,829,681) 844,667 210,227,995 Other Assets at Cost Less Amort. - - - - L Sub-Total 273,919.490 (1,829.681) 844,567 272,934.376 Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 294,763,413 5,737,934 300,501,347 W Section 4.Page 4 V Budget Review by District w District#5-Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review For The Nine Months Ended 3131196 Operating Budget Revie�ly 1995-96 Year To• Remaining Year-To-Date Budget Date Budget %Expended e REVENUES: Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Only) - - - 0.00% Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of l%) 2,415,000 1,637,889 877.131 63.68% Federal and State Construction Grants - - - 0.00% r. Connection Fees 47,000 157.991 (110,991) 338.15% Other Few 2,719.000 1,929,106 789,894 70.95% Sale of Capacity Rights 23,000 20,104 2,896 87.41% Interest It Misc. Receipts 1,295,000 1,334,868 (39,868) 103.08% Other 0.00% Total Revenues 6,499,000 4,979,938 1,519,062 76.63% OUTLAYS: Share of Joint Works Tamt.Plant 1,204,000 461,537 742,463 38.33% District Trunk Sewer Construction 500,000 507,896 (7,896) 101.58% COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 2,013,000 1,540,169 472,831 76.51% r Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 2,007.000 1,298,750 708,250 64.71% District Operating&Other Expenditures 765,000 593,127 171,873 77.53% Total Outlays 6.489.000 4,401,479 2,087,521 67.83% Capital Facilities BD�get Review Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance 7/1195 It Additions Fixed Assets 3131196 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: 5-33 Bay Bridge PIS Impr. 2,224 14 (2,238) - 5-35 So.Coast Trunk Sewer-Intl Phases 1 &2 - 2.481 - 2.481 5.36 Crystal Cove PIS - 0,477 - 8,477 5.34-2 Bayside Drive Trunk - 109,689 109,689 Miscellaneous Charges to Closed W.O. 1,041 10.796 - 11.837 _ 5-31 Coast Highway Force Mein Replacement 5&6 - - - - 5-32 Bitter Pt&Rocky Pt PIS Improv.5&6 1,921 5 (1,926) - . 5-37-3&4 PCH Gravity Swr Rehab 5&6 22,036 367,119 - 389.155 5.39 Siphon 5&6 695,190 16 (695,190) 16 r., Bay Bridge PIS Lighting 5&6 4,893 3,844 (8,274) 463 Bay Bridge PIS Platform - 1,956 1,956 BBterpolnt PIS Fan Upgrade - 2,881 2,881 Hydrogen Peroxide Trials 5& 14 714 618 1,332 Sub-Total 728,019 5071896 (707.628) 528,287 Shen of Joint Works 2,028.462 461,537 (100,095) 2,389,904 Sub-Total 2,758,481 969,433 (807,723) 2,918.191 COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIP: - Land and Property Rights 69,740 - 69,740 Collection Lines and Pump Sins. 33.827,105 (381.420) 707.628 34,173,313 Treatment Facilities 7.347 - - 7,347 Disposal Facilities 7.115 - - 7,115 General Plant and Admin. Facil. 39.799 (397) - 39.402 Equity In Joint Treatment Facil. 25.554,914 (218,847) 100,095 25.438.162 Other Assets at Cost Less Amon. 18,009 (18,009) Sub-Total 59,524,029 (598,673) 807.723 59,735,079 Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 62,280.510 372,760 62,653,270 .e Section 4•Page 6 L 1995-96 3rd Quarter Report District No. 6-Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review v For The Nine Months Ended 3131196 Operating Budget Review L 1995-96 Year-To- Remaining Year-To-Date Budget Date Budget %Expended REVENUES: b, Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Only) - - - 0.00% Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of 1%) 1,225,000 711,930 513,070 58.12% Federal and State Construction Grants - - - 0.00% Connection Fees 47,000 42,563 4,437 90.56% Other Fees 3.400.000 2,189,547 1,210,453 64.40% Sale of Capacity Rights 31.000 20,749 10,251 66.93% Interest&Misu Receipts 747,000 915,325 (168,325) 122.53% Other 0.00% Total Revenues 5,450.000 3,880,114 1,569,886 71.190/a OUTLAYS: V Share of Joint Works Trmt Plant 1,696,000 611,306 984,694 38.30 District Trunk Sewer Conshucton 1,735.000 1,634,843 100,157 94.23% COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 1,468,000 945,510 522,490 64.41% 1 Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 2,599.000 1,687,296 911,704 64.92% L District Operating&Other Expenditures 251,000 223,991 27.009 89.24% Total Outlays 7,649,000 5,102,946 2,546,054 66.71% Ls' Capital Facilities Budget Review Balance Adjustments Transferto Balance 711195 &Additions Fixed Assets 3131198 L CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Misc.Chg,to Closed Work Order (32,767) 4,036 - (28,731) V 14-1-1 A&B Gisler Int., 14-1-2 Baker Street 1,079,358 67,045 (1,066,461) 79,942 6-12 Fairview Relief 248,599 79,195 - 327,794 6-13 Air Base Sewers Abandonment 29.599 15,130 - 44,729 L Airbase Flowmeter Replacement 19,155 - (19,155) - 532 Bitter Pt&Rocky Pt PIS Improv. 5&6 700 1 (701) - 5-37-3&4 PCH Gravity Swr Rehab 5&6 8,891 1,468.475 - 1,477,366 Bitterpoint PIS Fan Upgrade - 9W 960 5-39 Siphon 5&6 36,689 1 (36,589) 1 Yr Sub-Total 1,390.124 1,634,843 (1,122,906) 1,902,081 Share of Joint Works 2,623,625 611,306 (130,040) 3,104,891 L Sub-Total 4,013,749 2,248,149 (1,252,948) 5,006,952 COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIP: Land and Property Rights 662 - - 562 yj Collection Lines and Pump Stns. 4,179,148 (130,Wg) 1,103,751 5,152,390 Treatment Facilities 2.653 - - 2,653 Disposal Facilities 7.394 - - 7,394 General Plant and Admin. Facil. 94,197 397 19,155 113,749 Equity in Joint Treatment Fadl. 32,001,104 (281,720) 130,040 31,849.424 Other Assets at Cost Less Amort 9,011 (9,011) Sub-Total 36,294,069 (420,843) 1,252,946 37,126.172 L Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 40,307.818 1,825.306 42,133,124 i V Section 4-Page 6 L Budget Review by District District No.7-Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review For The Nine Months Ended 3131196 Operating Budget Review 1995-9& Year-To- Remaining Yoar-to-Data Budget Date Budget %Expanded REVENUES: Tax Levy(Bond Faints)Only) - - - 0.00% Tax Allocaticas)Sueventions(Sham of l%) 3,230,000 1,643,444 1,356,556 57.07% Federal and State Construction Grarm - - - 0.00% Connecdon Fees 235,000 810,505 (575,505) 344.90% Other Fees 5,980,000 5,142,940 517,M 86.29% yd Sale of Capacity Rights 53,000 54,455 (1,458) 102.76% Interest&Mmc.Receipts 1.526.000 1.640.304 (114.304) 107.49% Other oco% Total Revenues 11.004.000 9.491.651 1,512.349 86.26% m OUTLAYS: Share of Joint Works Trml.Plain 2.700.000 1,234,456 1,545.545 44.40% District Trunk Sewer Construction 2.400.000 2,571,012 (171,012) 107.13% COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 2.401.000 1,671,043 729.957 69.60% ed Sham of Joint Works Operating Expenses 4.055.000 3,018,425 1.636,676 64.84% District Operating&Other Expenditures 1.90.000 1,142,852 816,148 58.34% Total Outlays 14,195.000 9,637,787 4,557,213 67.90% s. Capital Fac1lities Budget Review Balance Adjustments Tremferw Balance 711/95 &Additions Fixed Assols 3/31/85 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: 7-22 Parallel&Repl.Lemon Heights 173.397 1,654,796 - 1,828,193 _ 7-23-1 College Ave.Pump Sin Rep[Force Mains 16.991 2,559 - 19.550 7-24 Manhole Access a69 14,457 15.121 J-28 PIS Telemetry - 1,057 1.057 Mac Anhur PIS Ventilation 5,705 - (5,706) - 7-7-1 Main St.PIS Improv. Sg852 96,223 - 151.075 7-18 Orange Park Acres Sewer Study 124,537 - (124,537) - 7-19 Cowan Heights Sewer 55,335 - (55,335) - c 141-1 A&B Gisler Int.,14-1-2 Baker Small Force Main Districts 6.7&14 2.315.534 152,374 (2.423,775) "An Bar Mice Easement Index Beaks 13.236 - (13,235) - 7-14 Abandon 9 Pig,7-14-1&2 239.166 615.759 - 854,927 7-6-1-1 Sunflower Interceptor - 139 139 7-16 Lemon Heights Sewer 57,172 400 - 57,572 7-1-1 Glsler/Redhill bunk Ahandonmant 9,716 676 - 10,392 TechBe Pipe Replacement 2,663 - - 2,663 7-17 Orange Park Acres Sewer Rep. 35,160 10 - 35,359 7-1-2 Gisler-Redhill - 22,057 22,057 7-18-1 Mac Adhur Tmnk - 61 51 Main Street Flume Flowmeter - 24 24 Miscellaneous Charges to Closed W.O. 1,212 10241 (235) 11,218 SubTotal 3,105,345 2,571,012 (2,622,828) 3,053,531 Share of Jain Works 4,562,553 1.234.40 (232,630) 6,664,378 '^ SutrTotal 7,657,598 3.805.467 (2,855.456) 8,607,909 COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIP: Land and Property Rights 1,549.310 - - 1,649,310 Collection Lines and Pump Stns. 35,089.277 4 2.424.011 38.513,292 Treatment Facilities - - - OlspesalFacilities 10,782 - - 10,782 General Plant and Admin.Fecal. 92,099 - 5,706 97,605 Equity In Joint Treatment Facil. 57,219,422 (503,973) 232,630 56,948,079 Other Assets at Cost Lass Amon. 3,324 (52.588) 193.109 143,84s SubTotal 94,964214 (50,557) 21555,456 97,263.113 Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 102,622.112 3,248,910 105,871,022 -' Besides 4-Pap 7 1995-96 3rd Quarter Report District No. 11 - Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review For The Nine Months Ended 3131196 Operating Budget Review 1995-96 Year-To- Remaining Year-to-Date Budget Date Budget % Expended REVENUES: Tax Levy (Bond Fund(s)Only) 17,000 10,196 6,804 59.98% Tax AllocationslSubventions(Share of l%) 2,041,000 1,249,776 791,224 61.23% 1W Federal and State Construction Grants - - - 0.00% Connection Fees 118,000 373,085 (255,085) 316.17% Other Fees 3,220,000 2,082,760 1,137,240 64.68% Sale of Capacity Rights 40,000 37,247 2,753 93.12% Interest& Misc. Receipts 931,000 1,202,570 (271,570) 129.17% Other - - - 0.00% U Total Revenues 6,367,000 4,955,634 1,411,366 77.83% OUTLAYS: I Share of Joint Works Trod. Plant 2,099,000 887,620 1,211,380 42.29% L District Trunk Sewer Construction 1,635,000 1.350,804 284,196 82.62% COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 2,176.000 1,382,935 793,065 63.55% Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 3.486.000 2,273,712 1.212,288 65.2.2% District Operating& Other Expenditures 737,000 455.051 281,949 61.74% Total Outlays 10,133,000 6,350,122 3,782,878 62.67% Capital Facilities Budget Review Balance Adjustments Transferto Balance J 7/1195 &Additions Fixed Assets 3131196 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: 1 Slater P/S Motor& Pump 47 - - 47 Mu 11-17 Slater P/S Sewage Sys Improv. 4,414,216 1,347,222 - 5,761,438 Miscellaneous Charge to Closed W.O. 954 3.582 4,536 Sub-Total 4,415,217 1,360,804 5,766,021 u Share of Joint Works 3,471,604 887,620 (175,235) 4,183,989 Sub-Total 7,886,821 2.238,424 (175,235) 9.950,010 {r COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT& EQUIP: Land and Property Rights 146,986 - - 146,988 V Collection Lines and Pump Sins. 19,048,602 - - 19,048,602 Treatment Facilities - - - - Disposal Facilities 3,053 - - 3,053 ' General Plant and Admin. Facil. 30.682 - - 30,682 V Equity in Joint Treatment Facil. 43,058,620 (379.632) 175,235 42,854,223 Other Assets at Cost Less Amon. Sub-Total 82,287,943 (379,632) 175,235 62,083,546 1 Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 70,174,764 1,858,792 - 72,033,656 V Section 4-Page 8 i V Budget Review by District District No. 13 -Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review For The Nine Months Ended 3/31/96 Operating Budget Review 1996-96 Year-To- Remaining Year-TaDate Budget Date Budget %Expended REVENUES: Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Only) - - - 0.00% Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of 1%) - - - 0.00% Federal and State Construction Grants - - - 0.00% Connection Fees 470,000 276,930 193,070 58.92% Other Fees 818,000 481,656 336,344 58.88% Sale of Capacity Rights 6,000 5,487 513 91.45% Interest&Misc. Receipts 382,000 435,345 (53,345) 113.96% Other - - - 0.00% Total Revenues 1,676,000 1,199,418 476,582 71.56% OUTLAYS: m Share of Joint Works Trutt. Plant 322,000 146,052 175,948 45.36% District Trunk Sewer Construction 472.000 - 472,000 0.00% COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 27,000 15,480 11,520 57.33% Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 576,000 345,374 230,626 59.96% District Operating&Other Expenditures 64,000 26,965 37,015 42.16% Total Outlays 1,461,000 533,891 927,109 36.54% Capital Facilities Budget Review d Balance Adjustments Transferto Balance 711195 &Additions Fixed Assets 3131196 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Share of Joint Works 516,108 146,052 (26,618) 635,542 Sub-Total 516,108 146,052 (26,618) 635,542 COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT&EQUIP: Land and Property Rights - - - - e, Collection Lines and Pump Sins. 2,616,757 - 2,616,757 Treatment Facilities - - - - Disposal Facilities - - - General Plant and Admin. Facil. - - - - Equity in Joint Treatment Facil. 6,402,440 (57,666) 26,618 6,371,392 Other Assets at Cost Less Amon. - - Sub-Total 9,019,197 (57,666) 26,618 8,988,149 Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 9,535,305 88,386 - 9,623,691 _ Section 4-Page 9 L 1995-96 3rd Quarter Report District No. 14 - Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review L For The Nine Months Ended 3131196 Operating Budget Review L 1995-96 Year-To- Remaining Year-to43zEa Budget Date Budget % Expended REVENUES: r Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Only) - - - 0.00% Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of 1%) - - - 0.00% Federal and State Construction Grants - - - 0.00% L IRWD Fees 9,100,000 3,281,091 5.818,909 36.06% Other Fees - 4,714 (4,714) 0.00% Sale of Capacity Rights 41,000 31.080 9,920 75.80% Interest&Misc. Receipts 268,000 139,611 128,389 52.09% v Other - 0.00% Total Revenues 9,409,000 3,456,496 5.952,504 36.74% OUTLAYS: Share of Joint Works Trmt. Plant 2,116,000 900,343 1,215.657 42.55% District Trunk Sewer Construction 615,000 406,548 208.452 66.11% COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 158,000 91.054 66.946 57.63% L Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 1,463,000 2.270,115 (W7,115) 155.17% District Operating&Other Expenditures 511.000 175,496 335,604 34.34% Total Outlays 4,863,000 3,843,556 1,019,444 79.04% L' Capital Facilities—Pudclet Review Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance 711195 &Additions Fixed Assets 3131196 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: it Main Street Flume Flowmeter - 40 - 40 v 14-1-1 A&B Gisler Int., 14-1-2 Baker St. Force Main, Districts 6,7&14 5,827,644 405,807 (6,212,287) 21,164 Main SL Pump Station Improvements 7-7-1 94.911 363 - 95,274 L Bay Bridge PIS Lighting 5&6 258 202 (436) 24 Bay Bridge PIS Platform - 103 103 Hydrogen Peroxide Trials 38 33 71 r Sub-Total 5,922,851 408,548 (6,212,723) 116,676 Share of Joint Works 3.451.983 900,343 (174,958) 4,177,368 Sub-Total 9.374.834 1,306.891 (6,387,681) 4,294,044 V COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIP: Land and Property Rights - L Collection Lines and Pump Sins. 19,382,254 (12,878) 6,212.723 25.582,099 Treatment Facilities - - - - Disposal Facilities - - - - General Plant and Admin. Facil. 6.747 - - 6,747 im Equity in Joint Treatment Facil. 42,161.369 (379,031) 174,958 41,957,296 Other Assets at Cost Less Amon. - - - - Sub-Total 61,550.370 (391,909) 6,387.681 67.546.142 L Total Property,Plant& Equipment&CIP 70,925,204 914,982 71.840.186 V Section 4-Page 10 II W SECTION 5. SELF-INSURANCE FUNDS BUDGET REVIEWS r J r r r r J r J Self-Ins. Review Medical Fund Budget Review For The Nine Months Ended 3131196 Percent Actual of Budget Remaining Actual 1995-96 Through Through 1995-96 Through Increase Budget 3131196 3131/96 Budget 3/31195 (Decrease) .d Beginning Cash Balance 15,000 - 85,952 (85,952) Revenues: In-Lieu Prem. -CSDOC 400,000 261,848 65.46% 138,152 260,861 987 w - Employees 75,000 33.491 44.65% 41,509 28,665 4,826 Reimburse from Stop Loss Ins - - - - - Supplemental CSDOC Funding - - - (11,127) 11,127 Interest 6 Other - 1,744 (1,744) 633 1,111 Total Revenues 475,000 297,083 62.54% 177,917 279,032 18.051 Expenditures: Claims-Medical' - - 0.00% - 6,279 (6,279) - Dental 387,000 230,3B3 59.53% 156,617 214,079 16.304 Transfer Out - - - 113,162 (113,162) r, Contractural Services 50,000 33,719 6744% 16,281 31,395 2,324 Total Expenditures 437,000 264.102 60A4% 172.898 364,915 (100,813) r Excess Revenue (Expense) 38,000 32,981 86.79% 5,019 (85,883) 118,864 Ending Cash Balance 53,000 32,981 62.23% 5,019 69 32,912 >i 'Medical insurance has been purchased rather than self-funded since February 1994. m Section 5-Page 1 Ld 1995-96 3rd Quarter Report L Public Liability Fund Budget Review For The Nine Months Ended 3131196 L Percent Actual of Budget Remaining Actual LW 1995-96 Through Through 1996.96 Through Increase Budget 3/31196 3131196 Budget 3131195 (Decrease), Beginning Cash Balance' 3,356,000 3.315,495 3.392,913 (77.418)I� Revenues: iW In-Lieu Premiums 100,000 - 0.00% 100,000 - Interest&Other 200,000 127,666 63.78% 72.435 92,007 35,558 L Allocation to Other Funds - 54,679 0.00% (64,679) 67,a20 (13,141) Total Revenues 300,000 182.244 60.75% 117,756 159.827 22,417 Expenditures: Salaries 1,000 3,542 354.20% (2,542) - 3,5421 Claims 90,000 82,877 92.09% 7,123 1,764 81,113 Contractual Services 20,000 958 4.78% 19,044 2.837 (1,881), Legal Services 150.000 151.029 100.69% (1,029) 140,044 10,985 L Professional Services 10,000 462 4.62% 9,538 2,863 (2,401) Supplies&Other 1,000 136 13.60% 864 136 Total Expenditures 272,000 239,002 87.87% 32,998 147,508 91,494 '0 Excess Revenue(Expense) 28,000 (66,758) (202.71%) 84,758 12,319 (69,077)1 Ending Cash Balance 3,384,000 3,258,737 96.30% 125,263 3,405,232 (146,495) I W I� Includes$720,208 long-term receivable due from the County of Orange. W L W Section 5-Page 2 LJ Self-ins. Review Worker's Compensation Fund Budget Review .. For The Nine Months Ended 3131/96 Percent .. Actual of Budget Remaining Actual 1995.26 Through Through 1995.96 Through Increase Budget 3131196 3131196 Budget 3131195 (Decrease) Beginning Cash Balance' 795,000 648,241 748,810 (100.569) Revenues: In-Lieu Premiums 225,000 164,423 73.08% 60,577 173,077 (8,654) Interest&Other 43,000 28,508 66.30% 14,492 16,614 11,894 Total Revenues 268,000 192,931 71.99% 75,069 189,691 3,240 Expenditures: Salaries 10,000 - O.OD% 10.000 - - _ Claims 165,000 111,648 67.67% 53,352 96,150 15,498 Contractual Services 35,000 18,750 53.571/6 16250 18,898 (148) Legal Services 5,000 - 0.00% 5,000 - - Professional Services 35,000 9,959 28.45% 25,041 16,664 (6,705) Supplies&Other 12,000 0.00% 12,000 - Sub Total 262,000 140,357 53.57% 121,643 131.712 8,645 Excess Loss Policy 45,000 16,245 36.10% 28,765 25,568 (9,323) Total Expenditures 307,000 156,602 51.01% 150,398 157,280 (678) Excess Revenue(Expense) (39,000) 36,329 (93.15%) (75,329) 32,411 3,918 Ending Cash Balance 756,000 684,570 9D.55% 71,430 781,221 (96,661) 'Includes$151,754 long-term receivable due from the County of Orange w d Section 6-Page 3 III.Iiy W �LW I�LJ LJ This page was intentionally left blank I� i� IWI IlJ1 ICII IW W Section 5-Page 4 U U U U U SECTION 6. & 7. U OPERATIONAL REVIEW U U U U U U U U U U i i Activity Trends _ Joint Operating expenses through the third quarter are at 67 percent and 72 percent of budget and target expenses, respectively. Budget savings have been realized on chemicals, as new contract prices have declined, on the ocean monitoring contract with Science Applications International Corporation, as the monitoring work is carried forward into 1996-97, and in repair materials, because of the decrease in major breakdowns in plant and equipment. Overall, salaries are only at 69 percent as a result of savings from the early retirement program and an average vacancy rate of approximately 9 percent in authorized positions. Salary expenses will continue to increase as a result of 19 new employees that have been hired through the third quarter of 1995-96. 700 $627.30 $599.00 600 $552.8a 500 400 095-96 Budget 895-96 Target ■9 Months ended 03/31/96 300 236.65 236.85 236.64 200 100 0 Treatment Cost, Average Daily Flow, $per MG MGD Section 6 - Page 7 it 1995-96 3rd Qtr Report i LJ Board Secretary: The initial preparation times submitted for Joint Board agenda packages and minutes as reflected in the 96-96 Budget were estimates made without baseline data. Beginning in Jury, 1995, the Board Secretary's office has tracked actual time spent on these tasks. The first six months reflects actual hours spent on the Joint Board agenda package and minutes. The differentiation between estimates and acluals was unanticipated;however a comparison belvreen first quarter data and six month data indicate the listed time is more accurste than original estimates. These data will be used for future baseline projections. V 40.0 38.3 35.0 30.0 r 25.0 20.0 09S96 Budget 20.0 17.4 u ■3rd Qtr.Actual 15.0 10.0 L 4.0 5.0 0.0 Agenda Prep.Time, Completion of Minutes, LJ Hot. Hrs. Communications: V The number of tours during the first nine months is on target with annual estimates.Third quarter contacts averaged approximately _ 500,placing us ahead of the annual projection. The number of informational materials provided is also on target. The division remains on target for the number of newsletters published Over the course of the last three quarters. V )r ... 320 V 300 250 240 L 200 095-96 Budget I ■3rd Qtr.Actual 150 100 100 90 66 75 50 25 20 L0 j , No.of Tours& No.of People Informational No.of Employea L Presentations Contacted Matenals Newsletters X 100 Provided% 100 Published L Section 6 - Page 2 L Activity Trends Finance Administration: The required coverage ratio for senior lien debt,the ratio of certain revenues to the debt service coals,Is 1.25. Because one half of property taxes and user fees are received in December and April,while principal payments are made in August and February,the ratio will increase during the remainder of the year. Investment Interest earnings are running ahead of the budgeted yield as PIMCO manages our portfolio. Variable Interest rates required to remarket me COP Issues have been favorable as the"Orange County"penalty has declined and imesters are more comfortable with our credit and we have changed remarketing agents. Approximately half of our outstanding COPS are"synlhetlo-(aed"rate obligations. The number of COP issues outstanding is not expected to change this year as no new debt was budgeted. r 7.00 8.05% 6.00% 6 6 6.00 flop 5.00 4.00 ri 095-96 Budget 03rd Qtr.Actual 3.00 2.28 2.00 1.51 1.00 'tl 0.00 Sr.Debt Sve. Yield%on Coverage Ratio Invested Interest Rate COP Issues Reserves % Accounting: r Accounts Payable warrants and payroll warrants per FTE are slightly behind annual projections but are within expected estimates as they are running at 73 percent of annual totals. Both Industrial user bills and journal entries processed per FTE are slightly higher than annual projections at 63 percent and 82 percent,respectively. r 5.900 d 6,000 6,0m 4,331 4.100 4,000 3.750 3,390 3,000 2,717 095-96 Budget ■3rtl Qtr.Actual 2,000 952 782 1,000 0 Accounts Payable Payroll Warrants Industrial User Bills Journal Entries Warrants Issued Processed Processed Per FTE Processed Per FTE Per FTE Per FTE Section 6 - Page 3 bl ia) 1995-96 3rd Qtr Report L Purchasing 8 Warehousing: Purchase orders Issued per Full-time Equivalent(FTE)are below an expected 9-month trend yet ware higher than expected in the third quarter. As the fiscal year approaches an end,purchases are made;however,due to feral conservatism over the last nine r-i months due to the Districts-wide commitments to mduce the Joint Operating Expense budget by 10%.we remain well below Initial projections. The number of bids per FTE continues to exceed Initial estimates as contracting for servces becomes more frequent. The trend toward out-sourcing services will Increase formal and informal bids accordingly. Warehouse Issues per FTE are somewhat higher then the initial estimates band upon the consolidation of equipment and supplies to the appropriate Warehouse. This W procedure designates this Inter-movement of equipment and supplies as an Individual warehouse Issuance, therefore increasing reported activity above"actual"Issuance. - W 25.000 23 1. 20.000 18.670 15.040 15 I 15.000 r ❑95-96 Budget 11.429 9.195 83rd Qtr.Actual 10.000 5.000 0.000 4W P.O.'s Issued Per Written Bids Warehouse FfE X 10 Per FTE Issues Per FTE X 100 W Lr Li I LJ V tr L Le Section 6 -Page 4 W Activity Trends Information Technology Administration: Computer Users Supported per Full-Time Equivalent(FTE)Is based on the number of staff members in Information Technology Department([To)Waked with providing direct support. The wnent 43 FTE Usim firtat Improvement is the result of a realignment of the existing seat so that mare pemonnal are assigned to geneml support to computer uses,rather than W assigned exclusively In special projects. Hardware Work Ordem per FTE repmaent the number of Work Ordem completed divided by the number of ITD r stet assigned to such requests. The original benchmark of 17 was based solely on estimates as opposed to actual data and Is obviously inaccumte when compared against the 66/FrE year-to-cate. Progmmenable Logic Controllers are somewhat behind the annual estimate but expected to W achieved by fiscal yearend. Similarly,Data Paints Installed are running behind schedule due to PLC Implementation delays. r 200 176 152 128 120 104 095-96 Budget 80 66 57 r ■3rd Qtr.Actual 56 43 30 32 13 1] 79 r 8 -18 Plane Automation Computer Users Hardware Work Programmable Logic Additional Date Supported per FTE Orden per FTE Controllers lrwtellatl Point Installed (xtOa) Hardware Support: w The phone directory numbers maintained per FTE Indicates the number of PBX or telephone lines serviced. Unexpected expansion in this system has resulted In more number maintained than those n8ected In the Activity Trend estimates for FY 1995-96. Similarly,due to the increasing use of technology,we have mom personal computers than initially estimated. This case ls also reflected in the Card Readers graphic. Hardware work orders per FTE else reflect an unanticipated Increase. Because of the additions of the aforementioned devices,work orders to Install and maintain them have also Increased beyond Initial estimates. 120.0 105 100.0 83 r 80.0 ,e 095-96 Budget 60.0 50 49 ■3rd Qtr.Actual 40.0 20.0 13.0 17.0 8 12 Directory Numbers Personal Hardware Work Card Readers Maintamed/ E Computer Ordem/FTE MaIntamed/FTE X 10 MaintainedlFTE Section 6 - Page 6 1995-96 3rd Qtr Report Software 6 Plant Automation: Software work orders per FTE is well above FY 199496 Activity Trend estimates due to no Initial benchmark data to derive Initial estimates. This process as been naMorked and automated via a Maintenance Management System(MMS)that allows other divisions to direct work orders W tolTelectrenlcally. The ease ofdlreciing work orders WIT,the additional internal controls requiring staff to be more stringent In documenting requests for service(e.g.quick service call).and the expanding other base account for the Increase. The number of network users supported per FTE issues from additional computer purchases and Implementation. The vast majority of desktop computers are networked to one of several servers and thus require ongoing network troubleshooting,maintenance,repair and upgrade. sr+ 100 b g0 so L 70 62 so a"Budget 40 36 W ■Ord Ott.Actual 30 20 7 10 0 80111were work Nalwwk 40 Ordw&FM Users Supported+712 1. Ise li L L taJ t . W 4ri W Section 6 - Page 6 W r Activity Trends Human Resources Administradon: After further research,the Activity Trends In the FY 1995-96 Budget required refinement to more accurately portray the performance of the r Human Resources Department.Human Resources surpassed Is goal of 83 employees supported by each HR employee with the elimination of two positions. Human Resources training as a percentage of operating expense continues to reflect National benchmarks. r 12.0 r 10.3 10.0 8.3 r 8.0 095-96 Budget 6.0 r 03m Qtr.Actual 4.0 2.6% 2.3% 2.0 0.0 — Employees Supported HRrrmining as a% s Per Human Resource of Operating Expense Employee X 10 r Human Resources& Training: The Districts recruitment time or'time to fill'numbers for new positions continues to exceed the National average by two to four times. Although significant progress he been made during the 2nd and 3re quarter periods,a poor first quarter continues to affect year4adate r averages.Current recruitments for exempt and nonexempt employees are averaging 110 days and 81 days respectively. Turnover compares extremely favorably to the benchmark for utility agencies and falls below the expected turnover ratio of 10%nationally for private organizations. Exempt employee costs are significantly lower as In-house staff are primarily used instead of executive search firms. Non- exempt employee coats have Increased slightly above benchmarks,but overall recruitment coals are significantly below national averages. r r 160 143 140 120 ® 9] 100 $85.0 80 09S96 Budget 59 ■3m Otr.Actual 60 3 40 7 $17.92 $18.7 r 20 e 7.8% 0.4% $12.6 0 No.of Recruitment No.of Recrultment Employee Cost Per Exempt Cost per Non-Fxempt Days For Exempt Days For Non- Turnover Employee I Employee Hired X 10 Employees Exempt Employees Hired Em I o x 100 Section 6 - Page 7 W 1995-96 3rd Qtr Report i WOW 8 Emergency Response: During the find nine months,woBers'compensation claims were below the annual trend projection. It Is expected we will be at least 10%below estimated tinges. Additionally,the Total Injury Rate was 6.7 as opposed to last year's 8.9-a 25%dechume. The Districts'accident experience Is W even mom significant when compared to the 16.3 industry average for Total Injury Ras,and Is notably lower than the We previous years. We believe this can be attributed to the successful implementation of new safety programs and Improvement in existing programs during the last several quarters. The lost work day rating Is a reflection of these programs. Job Hazard Analyses and Regulatory Compliance Audits are generally on target. u 95 45 095-96 Budget 40 1113m Qtr.Actual 35 h25 30 25 20 20 I ' 15 12.3 10 8.7 g 8.7 I 5 4 2.5 1.7 0 No.of Job Site Total Injury Job Huard Workers' Safety Regulatory Los[Work RaOs y Comp.Claims Compliance Compliance Day Rate ns 10 Audis Audits _ W V I V I L I 4r Ir i W Section 6 - Page 8 u Activity Trends Maintenance Adminlstrafion: As stipulated in the following maintenance sections,one of the primary focuses of the Maintenance Department In Fiscal Year 1995.96 is to develop a solid database for our Computerized Maintenance Management System(CMMS),thereby devoting more time to a total Planned Maintenance philosophy. The trends we develop this fiscal yearwlll be utilized to project future expectations. The graph portrays the impact of CMMS implementation and resource allocation on the Maintenance DepaNmem,as well as the temporary freezing of authorized positions(both discussed in further detail In the respective maintenance divisions). Although a 2:1 ratio of preventive maintenance(pm)tasks versus corrective maintenance(cm)teaks due to the aforementioned Is unlikely,a 50%.150%ratio is achievable. This ratio is acceptable and considered progressive based on many maintenance Industry benchmarkststandams. r 60.0 095-95 Budget 52.0 ■are Qtr.Actual 49.2 50.0 w 40.0 30.0 17.5 20.5 20.0 15.0 15 i 9.0 9.4 10.0 5.0 5.0 4.7 -0 r 0.0 Preventivo Corrective Meant. Preventive Corrective Corrective Equipment Records Maintenance Tasks Maintenance Maintenance Maintenance Entered Into Completed Backlog Backlog Cora Tasks Completed o9 9 Suspended Outer x l000 x l000 x 100 x wo x 10 x l000 Maintenance Scheduling: The Planning&Scheduling Division is a new unit this fiscal year,and as such,did not have reliable baseline data to develop accurate Activity Trend benchmarks. The goals stipulated In the FY 199546 budget are only reasonable estimates of new job duties to establish future parameters. Disciplines have been reluctant to remove'unneetled'slock because they believed the Item costa would be deducted from their budgets. However,we have recommended a reduction in obsolescent inventory by$225,000 for the first nine months of the year. Asa result of benchmarking preventive maintenance on major facility accouterments,our scheduled PM program for Pdmary/Secondary basins and digesters meant or exceeds our ini0al estimates. The disciplines are Implementing such PM programs vs' beginning lest month. 29 30.0 r 25.0 250 22.5 20.0 15.0 - 095-96 Budget 12 11 s 03rd Qtr.Actual 10a 4 4 5 5.0 r 00 Reduce Perform Pmvenlive Maintenenr on: Obsolete Primary Digester Seconds Inventory,$ Secondary Basins Cleaning Basins r %10,000 Section 6 - Page 9 1995-96 3rd Qtr Report Plant Maintenance: The Division continues its commitment in developing the CMMS database and the firms towards Planned Maintenance. Development support is provided by 2.0 FTEs at the craft level. Continued growth in the equipment records and P.M.Instructions records have �+ created higher backlogs along with the lack of additional wrench support'normally provided by the FTEs. Also,time spent by staff on facility improvements affecte maintenance backlogs. Development of the area assignment system is behind schedule due to indirect activ0ias. The performance measures are expected to be on target and completed by the end of the fourth quarter. kJ Isw 600.0 095-96 Budget 550.0 -- 500 500.0 ■3rd Qtr.Actual L275 400.0 320.0 300 300.0 2122 278 I.a 200.0 82.9 63 100.0 0.0 LW Preventive Corrective Pieces of Computerized _ Preventive Maintenance Corrective Maintenance Maintenance Maintenance Equipment Preventive Tasks Completed Maintenance Backlog Backlog In computer Maintenance Lr X 10 Completed x 10 Database X 10 Instructions krrr Collection Facilities Maintenance: This Division continues with its development of the CMMS database and Planned Maintenance. Development is assisted by 1.5 FTEs from this division with support provided by 1.0 FTE from the Planning Division. Incorporation of new P.M.activities and the few$on 60 root control program in District 7 account for higher backlogs. Total sewer overflows to date are less than expected with credit going to the staffs continued commitment to Improve maintenance methods and attention to known trouble areas. Use of contract services for some of the line cleaning in District 7 is behind schedule. This delay is due to the vacancy In the Maintenance Staff Engineer position W who was developing bid documents. The Maintenance Manager will work with staff to help finalize this task In the fourth quarter. 100.0 90.0 ❑95-95 Budget 80.0 1113rd Qtr.Actual r 70.0 60.0 50 50.0 37 35 14 40.0 25.7 30 30.0 20.01) 20.022.1 21.620.3 -- 20.0 9.0 1D 17.7 12 3 10.0 ,12 0.- M�M Pis NYa qamxv, Piev-awe CmeeNe p1B-°°� Pimem�re spoil I �OaM%fro MMtl MVM MavrtBxM%9 Equip Men! aepvW etltle8 LamMnnWC XWO a %1.a]J laeMuCba W Section 6 - Page 10 L r Activity Trends Mechanical Maintenance A major goal of the Division for FV 1995.96 is the emphasis on the development of the Computerized Maintenance Management System we (CMMS)database and its requisite Inventory items. Approximately 63%of the annual target for"Pieces of Equipment.Computerized"has been maintained through the first nine months. The Division is In the process of completing cross training of all field level staff and is 75%complete. Preventive maintenance tasks completed are within targeted parameters and we have considerably improved.our The corrective maintenance backlog when compared against estimated annual Activity Trend projections have experienced an increase due to CMMS reporting. The Division has maimalned a 12%vacancy rate in order to meet the 10%reduction in the Joint Operating Expense budget. r 60.0 096-96 Budget 75.0 70.0 111113rd Qtr.Actual 62.7 we 60.0 60.0 38.6 40.0 35.0 r �'3 27.0 250 30.0 22.3 17.5 20.7 15 17.1 20.0 10.0 r 0.0 Preventive Corrective Preventive Corrective Pieces of Computerized Maintenance Tasks Maintenance Maintenance Maintenance Equipment Preventive r Completed Tasks Backlog Backlog in Computer Maintenance X 100 Campletetl X 10 X 10 Database Instructions X 100 X 100 X 100 r Electrical Maintenance: A major goal of the Division for FT 1995.96 is the emphasis an the continued development of the Computerized Maintenance Management System(CMMS)Database and Its requisite Inventory items. Approximately 97%of the annual target for'Pieces of Equipment-Computerized" ,r has been achieved thus far. The expansion of this Database has resulted In an increase in the quantity of maintenance items coming due for PM. Although preventive maintenance backlog has remained relatively constant,the PM tasks completed category has risen sharpty during the quarter due to the sh10 in resources from Database development to PM tasks. Furthermore,efforts to complete the inventory database required a shift in resources resulting in lower production in the Preventive Tasks Completed category. Corrective tasks completed are well r within targeted parameters for the year and we are within the estimated annual Activity Trend projections for corrective maintenance backlog. The Division continues to maintain a 100A vacancy rate in staffing levels that will not be filled this fiscal year. 120 09546 Budget 112.7 11113re Qtr.Actual r 100 BD 65 5 80 77.3 r 60 55 J'[3W 40 35.0 32.5 35.2 20.0 18.1 r 20 0 PreVatbtiva Coned. Preventative Pieces of Preventative weMNmananro Tasks Maintenance Maintenance comongve Equip Melntmumce completed Tasks Completed Backlog Maintenance computemat Inabunoons X100 X100 x10 Barking X1ao Cemputer@e0 x 100 Section 6 - Page 11 1995-96 3rd Qtr Report r Inshamentatlon Maintenance., A major goal of the Division for F1'1995-96Is the emphasis on the conUnued development of the Computerized Maintenance Management System(CMMS)database and its requisite inventory dams. Approximately 109%of the annual target for'Piecas of Equipment-Computerized* Y.I has been achieved the thbd quarter. Because of the development of new fadlltles,our Inventory has Increased and thus exceeded initial Activity Trend estimates in this category. During the third quarter,manpower resources have been shifted from database development to preventive and cormctive backlogs. This shift has resulted In a redudlon of backlog In both categodes and a significant incmase in PM tasks completed.The corrective maintenance tasks completed category is on target with Advity Trend projections. The Division has maintained a 10%vacancy rah W whlch will not be filled this fiscal year. jsal 120.0 096-96 Budget 103.6 is 100.0 ■3rd Qtr.Actual 97.0 95.0 80.0 850 77.3 1W.0 80.0 40.0 30.7 37.5 34.3 20.0F 12.0 11.5 ywj 0.0 . I praventM correNva prevemrve Cvrecttve Pkmaor computemed Mehreamn Talks MelnM1reme Melnte". MalnMrance Equipment Preventive j cmrgland Talks eaddog BeddaO In Compuiw MaintenanceIwl x1a0 compiesexlao X10 Database X 100 Insbuctiorwx 100 kad Lai V L W IL W V Section 6 - Page 12 r Activity Trends r Plant Operations: Activity trends for the first nine months of FY 1995-96(ending March 311 are generally tracking as expected when compared against r 105-96 annual estimates. Actual expenditures for chemicals are below annual trends as are plant operations cost(per MGD). Lower per unit wets for caustic soda and hydrogen peroxide were achieved by price negotiations with vendom. Actual plant operation division coat of$240 per million gallons is approximately 10%below the annual estimate of$265 per million gallons. a. Budget savings have been realized through the aforementioned unit costs on chemicals and staff vacancies which resulted in labor savings. r r 90.0 61.0 D 95-96 Budget KC73.8 1113rd Ob.Actual 70.0 60.0 $54.3 50.0 41.6 42.6 41.0 r 40.0 37.3 $29.7 30.0 23.7 29.6 $26.5$24A 20.0 10.0 0.0 Influent Flow In Biosolida Enemv Ilsese in kW z 100 Chemical Plant Operation Tens of Millions Production Costa Division Cost of Gallons in Pounds per Plant One Plant Two X100,000 Per Million Gallons Per Day Million Gallons X 10 x 100 r r r r Section 6 -Page 13 r ,r 1995-96 3rd Qtr Report Environmental Management. The Ocean Monitoring Baseline Program is a fixed-price contract worth$1.49 million that extends Into FY 1996-97 and will not be fully expanded until that time. Charges Invoiced during the first nine months total-$571,000. The target number of Amid samples u collected during the year for the baseline Ocean Monitoring Program(OMP)is 1284 samples of which 1210(93%)were collected during the first nine months of the fiscal year. Typically,the bulk of collection is accomplished in mid-summer,or during the fat quarter of the fiscal year. The inability to coiled 100%of the target number of samples was due to the Iola of three field samples W and the lack of target aquatic species for appropriate testing. Each year the Districts contribute funds to the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project(SCCWRP)under a joint-powers agreement. Approximately 50%has been expended. One of the special studies conducted by Environmental Management B the charededzation of water quality within our study area utilizing a Find grid of 32 stations. Water quality samples taken are on target Vr L i 6J 400.0 384 i 3KID W 095-96 Budget $310.0 ._ 300.0 N3ro Qtr.Actual 263 $245.0 250.0 20D.0 W $148.6 150.1 150.0 128.4 121.0 4 10D.0 $85.1 $57.1 50.0 W .0 Ocean SCCWRP Joint Ocean Monitoring Water Oualdy Ocean Monitoring Monitoring Powers Agreement Special Studies Samples Taken LI Baseline Program Samples Contribution Cost X 10,000 X 10 X1,000 X 1.000 W L L I la4 4 Section 6 - Page 14 L r Activity Trends r Environmental Sciences Laboratory., The Activity Trends noted In the FY 1995-98 Budget do not adequately quantity the duties and responsibilities of the Environmental 'r Sciences Laboratory(ESL). As a result,we are modVng our reporting to better reflect lab operations. The Information below depicts the actual number of analyses(through February) to be completed divided by the estimated number of analyses. Results greater than 100%indicate the lab has performed more analyses than initial estimates while numbers below 100%indicate r performance less than estimates. Overall,sample load is tracking within 5%of projected,but significant reductions am seen In both source control and marine monitoring. These may be due to the baseline data benchmarks taken from the time period July 1995- October 1995. Special project samples ere 10.7%greater than projected due primarily to increases In process Improvement projects in plant operations. ae 120.0% 110.7% s 100.0% 100.5% 103.5% 89.4% 96.4% 96.1% 93,5% 33.9% 80.0% 60.0% r 40.0% 20.0% r 0.0% IM/EF So. P.. ffi f s M. Sxxt u Nr su NPDM coM C. MonlorMB Pro., r Source Control: The new and renewed permit issuance activity is 51%of the budgeted item due to pemlil renewals which are lower during the first half of every fiscal year. The routine sampling and Inspection of factl@ies are 69%of the benchmark and are well within the expected trend. The downstream surveillance and Strike Force activities are at 93%of the annual estimate due to the Increased need for further investigation of illegal dischargers. Enforcement actions are 67%ofthe activity trend benchmark. Remaining activity trends portrayed are within the expected range of variabibly. r 300.0 095-96 Budget 266.8 r 250.0 03rd Otr.Actual 182.0 88.1 200.0 163.6 r 150.0 12.6 118 95.6 100.0 76.0 50•8 79 42.039.1 r 50,0 24.024.0 0.0 Newend Routlne fiemplin9 end Oawnabaam E =MBM FreboabrleM Pen rypg Regulation I� � ts ftnrh�ENon4 6urveianres, A�osloade � Eric 0 Small 0wntry, PomMe permiRtl0 chargers 6Mx Force Oreen nGeneral Dischargers luu� x10 %10 Cbaeapnndenp ryes x to Section 6 - Page 15 1995-96 3rd Qtr Report Engineering Administration: The original Capital Outlay Revolving Fund(CORF)forecast was$33.5 million of which$27.4 million was the direct responsibility _ of the Engineering Department. This$27.4 million budget has now been revised to$19 million through June 30, 1996 due to several factors. The primary factor is that several projects had been delayed including the primary rehabilitation projects and the Plant 2 Maintenance Building. The Plant 2 Warehouse has been canceled,and budgets for some projects have been revised downward to more accurately reflect estimates of construction costs. Through the third quarter,we have expended 65 k of the revised budget. 30 $27.4 25 20 $16$12.4 095-96 Budget ■95-96 Projected 15 ■3rd Qtr.Actual 10 5 0 C.O.R.F.Expenditures (in millions) Design Engineering: The number of connection permits issued as well as number of design submittals reviewed represents fluctuating woddoad and contractor preferences that do not hold to predictable quarterly patterns. The number of connection permits issued exceed nine month estimates while submittals reviewed are less than nine month estimates. The number of Capital Outlay Revolving Fund (CORF)projects bid this fiscal year is in line with the estimate. Because the projects were bid later than anticipated the expected submittal load has shifted to a later period, Major collection projects(by individual district)have been delayed to accommodate city .. projects such that none will be bid this fiscal year. 156.0 160 140 120 095-96 Budget ■3N Qtr.Actual 100 so 60 40 39 35.0 40 6 14 20 2 0 0 � No.of Connedicn No.of Submittals Budgeted CORF Budgeted Permits Issued Reviewed! Projects Bid Collection x 10 Projects Bid Section 6 - Page 16 r Activity Trends r Engineering Planning Punier review of me FY 1995-96 Budget Acclivity trends resulted In additional quantification of activities. The development of the Strategic r Plan was assigned to the Engineering Planning Division In July,1996.Dud the first six months,the components 9 9 g Y Metdate o/the plan were developed and the ground work laid for phase implamentatlon. A scope o/work and schedule were adopted and a taiga[tlale M 1/96 set for completion of the new Strategic Plan, Phose I Is underway and includes three projects:the rehabilitation of our existing ocean ounell,a study on hydraulic requirements,and a study to determine the most equitable capital and user charge system. The Board of Directors approved Professional Services Agreements In the third quarter for the Phase 1 work. The Phase 2 wodc will start In the fourth quarter of 1995-96. r 199 -1-6 998 � Iw i ms9 mW Bite aw Ba& mW r emav saasov spIDa seen asps sours Construction Management The amount budgeted for CORP engineering construction projects in the fire[nine months is slightly low compared to the FY 1995-95 budget. This was due to the uncertainty surrounding the County bankruptcy and the ultimate delay of projects. Our change orders am below annual estimates due to aforementioned project delays as wall as improved project planning. r r $20.0 $19.1 095-96 Budget r $15.0 .4 09 Months Ended $12 $10.0 r 5.0 $5.0 2.7% r CORP Dollar Amount of r Constmclion Change Orders as a Projects %of Construction Contract Section 6 - Page 17 r �I �I �I This page was intentionally left blank W IW iLd fV ILi IW 61 Section 6 -Page 18 r Project Tracking r Districts Wide Measurement Tracking r 102 Measurement Projects r 70 r 60 49 50 r `oE 40 C so 20A 6 19 r 9 10 1 2 JmOL Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled r As part of the fiscal year 1995-96 budget process, performance measurement projects were established for all departments/divisions within the organization. The chart above shows a status summary, as of the end of the first quarter, of all the performance measurement projects approved in .. the 1995-96 budget document. The following pages present a status of each departments/divisions performance measures as of the r end of the first quarter. r r r r Section 7 -Page 1 r W 1995-96 3rd Quarter Report W Executive Management 9 Measurement Projects W a u e I 7 W a 8 5 y a V 3 2 W i o V Ahead On Track Done Behind On Hold W Measurement Me %complete Slatus start !rM _ Complete Consolidation Study. a5% On Hold 711/95 Improve management skills of managers and supemburs. 85% On Track 711/95 Support Boards consideration of committee structure change. 100% Done 7/1195 12131/95 - Represent Districts'interests in Orange County bankruptcy. 90% On Track 7H/95 - .i W Improve agency communication. 75% On Track 7/1/95 - Dirsct work on Districts'Strategic Plan. 10% On Track 7/1/95 - Create climate that promotes change. 75% On Track 7/1195 - W Establish clear goals for the departments and all subordinate units. 100% Done 711/95 12/31/95 Renew NPDES ocean discharge permit. 50% Behind 7/1/95 - W W W W Section 7 - Page 2 u Project Tracking Board Secretary 2 Measurement Projects s 2 _ n E f r 0 — Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled r Measurement Tide %Complete Status Start End Streamline procedures for preparing agenda and minutes. 75% On Track 711/95 - Provide regular updates of Director Info.to mgmt.and Committee secr. 75% On Track 7/1195 - Communications 4 Measurement Projects V✓ 4 — Sk 3 3 2 r 2 1 0 Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled r Measurement Title %Complete Status Start End Establish and organize Communications OMce. 100% Done 711195 imi/95 r Define Communications Office Mission 8 develop work plan. 100% Done 7/1/95 12131/95 Prepare Communications Once Procedures Manuel. 0% Canceled 7/1/95 - ar Develop a biannual publication for public officials and comm.leaders. 0% Canceled 12/31/09 - r Section 7 - Page 3 r 1995-96 3rd Quarter Report W Finance Administration 4 Measurement Projects LW 4 Ir ed3 a ¢ 2 W E � f I 0 Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hald Canceled Measurement Title %Complete Status Start End W Replace variable rate bonowing remarketing agent to mduco casts. 100% Done 7/1/95 12/31/95 Complete Implementation of treasury management functions. 100% Done 711/95 12/31/95 Provide safe,liquid and productive cash and Investment program. 100% Dane 1/1195 9/30195 W Improve comprehensive budget process started In 1994-95. 90% On Track 7/1196 6MO196 -- Accounting 3 Measurement Projects u V 3 E@� it E n 1 a Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled W Measurement Title %Complete Status Start End Oversee the acquisition of a new Integrated Financial Info.System. 75% On Track 711195 6/30196 W Develop DlsUlgs'-wide Finance policy 8 procedure manual. 25% Behind 7/1/95 4I30/96 Develop Dismcts'-wide comprahensNe budget manual. 100% Dane 7/l/95 12/31/95 - W W Section 7 -Page 4 W Project Tracking r Purchasing & Warehousing 4 Measurement Projects r r 4 5 3 r. E E 2 :11 , S r 0 Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled r Measurement Title %Complete Status Start End Compete revision of bidders list applic.to tie to commodity code luting. 85% On Hold 711195 1131196 Establish annual contracts to reduce need for in-house Inventory. 10% Behind 7/lt95 3131/g6 Establish ABC analysis for classifying and analyzing Inventory. 80% Behind 1/1/g5 3/31196 Develop policy on removal of mist low coal hardware from inventory. 10% Behind 7/l/95 12/31/95 r Information Technology Administration 4 Measurement Projects 4 `o E 3 8 e 2 E ll 1 d all 0 Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled r Measurement TlBe %Complete Status Start End Develop Information Systems Master Plan 0% On Hold 7/1/95 r Develop Performance Measurement survey for IT Department users. 100% Done 7/1/95 - Obtain adequate working space for IT Department staff. 5% On Track 7/1/95 - CreateformalPoliciesandProceduresManual for IT Department. 0% Behind VIM - r Section 7 - Page 5 W 1995-96 3rd Quarter Report W Hardware Support 3 Measurement Projects u 3 8 `0 2 E - e y 1 z m s 0 u Ahead On Trade Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled Measurement Title %Complete Statute Start End W Install auxiliary PBX for Plant 2 to provide added telephone capabllaies. 100% Done 7/1195 12f3195 Implement Ethernet throughout Dismcls 80% Behind 71195 1/31198 Implement Districts wide integrated network for timely,accurate and coal- 0% Not Started 1/1/95 6/30196 W effective sharing and analysis of databases. W Software & Plant Automation 4 Measurement Projects W W 4 `o Epm3 W Ea 2 3i 0 Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Haut Canceled W Measurement Tide %Complete Status Start End Extend CMMS application to include data for Warehouse and Auto shop. 0% On Hold 7/195 - Software support for installation and implementation of new integrated FIS. 0% On Hold 7H95 - Replace Plant Automaton System at Plant 2 with new technology 60% On track 71195 armor - InstallDislnctawideintegratednetwodx. 1% Behind 7/1/95 W30MS L W I.0 Section 7 -Page 6 r Project Tracking r Human Resources Administration 3 Measurement Projects we 9 r 2 — — - � 1 0 Ahead On Track Dow Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled Measurement TlNa %Complete Status Start End Develop and Implement a DMttlda-wide training program. 80% On Track 7/1/95 - Develop and publish an Employee Handbook. 100% Done 711195 4115195 Improve the Quality of the Management Performance Review Prog rem. 85% On Track 712/95 5130195 r Human Resources & Training 3 Measurement Projects 3 rl r m 2 E a 1 2 0 r 0 Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled Measurement Title %CMPIMe SMas Start End Develop and implement training opportunities and programs. 50% On Trade 711/95 - r Improve and refine management and professional staff evaluations. 85% On Track 711195 - CondudDistrtds-wide attitude survey. 100% Done 711/95 11/30/95 Safety & Emergency Response 3 Measurement Projects r 8 3 — o c m 2 z � 0 Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled Measurement Tide %Complete Status Start End r Develop safety training programs based on needs assessment. 100% Done 711/95 ID31/95 Develop and implement an Integrated Emergency Response Plan. 10% On Track 711195 Conduct industrial hygiene evaluations to determine hazards. 0% On Hold 711/95 Section 7 - Page 7 r 1995-96 3rd Quarter Report u Maintenance Administration 3 Measurement Projects I 3 — W fl o E 2 E W E � t f 0 — W Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled Measurement Tide %Complete Status start End v Emphasize preventive maintenance we"to reduce Ida cycle costs. 85% On Track 7/1195 - Implement remaining Ernst&Young O&M recommendations. 70% Ahead 711/95 - Continuebulldingthecomputerdatabasetartha CMMS. 85% On Track 1/1/95 - W.0 w Maintenance Scheduling 2 Measurement Projects W W 2 `ko E W E E 1 E � - 2 rt f 0 Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled w Measurement Tide %Complete Statue Start End Identify optimum preventive maintenance rates to reduce costa. 50% On Track 7/1195 - Benchmark equipment dmn time and establish acceptable targets. 50% On Track 7/1195 - i l� Ili W Section 7 - Page 8 -- r Project Tracking r Plant Maintenance r 4 Measurement Projects r 2 8E fige 1 z f r 0 Mead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled r Measurement Tilde %Complete Status Start End Develop a valve exerolaing plant maintenance program. 40% On Track 7/t195 W0/96 Develop a valve change plant maintenance program for critical areas. 15% Behind 711195 6/30/96 r Investigate applicable certification programs for the various crafts. 25% On Track 7/1195 SM96 Develop an area assignment sys.to leverage field crew resources. 20% Behind 7/1195 6I30/95 r Collection Facilities Maintenance r 4 Measurement Projects r 4 r � EEe3 8 C 2 a + r z � 1 0 Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled r Mamuremenl TNle %Complete Status Start End Develop a CMMS data base for pump stations 5 a plant main.fisting. 70% On Track 7/1/95 6/30196 r Continue to investigate alternate chemicals for cheaper odor control. 60% On Track 7/1195 - Contract for line cleaning in some of the Districts'Assmt.Districts. 60% Behind 7/1195 6/30/96 ,r Expand a root control program for District No.7 sewer system. 60% Behind 711195 1/31196 r r Section 7 -Page 9 r L 1995-96 3rd Quarter Report u Mechanical Maintenance 3 Measurement Projects 6d 3 a 8 m 2 8e u E m t z m SEVE 0 Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled Measurement Tide %Complete Status Start End W Initiate tracking program for repaliive breakdowns of digester pumps. 50% On Track 711196 6/30/98 Reduce costs by expanding central generation engines malmenance. 75% Ahead 7/1195 - Stan=ss training of personnel between plants. 50% On Track 711195 - V Li Electrical Maintenance 4 Measurement Projects I6w 1 LI 4 `o m 3 V B 2 2 E z 1 6w 0 _ Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled kW Measurement Tide %Complete Status start End Complete CMMS database with regard to A/C systems. 100% Dane 711/95 2128/96 Develop a predictive maint.program for electric equipment. 80% Ahead 7/1/95 3131/96 W Develop a 12-Kilovolt meter and relay database. 95% Ahead 711/95 6/30196 - Privat¢a Central Generation Generator Maintenance to reduce Coats. 100% Done 711/95 11/30/95 W L LI Section 7 - Page 10 - L r Project Tracking Instrumentation Maintenance 3 Measurement Projects d 3 9 `002 r a E ] Nt 2 0 f d 0 Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled d Measurement TlOe %Complete Status Start End Develop activity codes within CMMS to track staff efforts. 15% On Track 711/95 W30195 Privatize maintenance services for the 13 Influent flow meters. 95% Behind 7/1195 3131/96 r Develop a charting process for recording preventative main.backlog. 90% Behind 711/95 1/31196 r Technical Services Administration 4 Measurement Projects 4 r 'o 3 S22 E � Z w 0 Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled r Measurement Title %Complete Status start End Improve coverage of legislation&Improve assmt of compliance regs. 100% Done 7/1195 12131/95 Develop Imprvmnt.teems&begin Implementing EV recommendations, 75% On Track 7/1/95 6130/96 Develop compliance eHnht.on discharges from treatment plants. 15% On Hold 7/1/95 6130196 ,r Standardize blosollds Inspection protocols&optimize staff usage. 75% Behind 711/95 3131/96 r Section 7 -Page 71 L 1995-96 3rd Quarter Report L Environmental Management 3 Measurement Projects I� 3 W m � E 2 a° @ LW E m 1 z o S 0 Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled Measurement Tdie %Complete Status Stan End y Develop a 10-year synthesis of ocean monitoring program findings. 10% Behind 7H/95 2/28M Conduct a study of biotddding fitters for the removal of pollutants. 90% Behind 711/95 2/28/98 Prepare a 1995 Air Tonics Emission Inventory Plan and Report. 70% Behind 7/V95 2/28/98 W Environmental Sciences Laboratory 3 Measurement Projects W I u 3 5 2 W z ES t A- Ir1 0 Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled I W Measurement Title %Complete statue start End Develop expanded air analysis capabilities 30% On Track 7/1/g5 - Reduce labor costs for metals analyses of wastewater. 10% On Track 7/1195 W Reduce labor costs for organic analyses of wastewater. 10% On Track 7/1195 - I- IW W W Section 7 • Page 12 L; Project Tracking Source Control 3 Measurement Projects r 3 8EE 2 r $ p i1 r n Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled y Measurement Tme %Complete Stehre start End Evaluate the EPA Effluent Guidelines for regulating industrial users. 75% On Track 7/1/95 6130/96 Finalize the resuhs of the non-Industrial source sampling. 60% On Track 7/1195 6/30196 Develop a program to regulate small-quamily dischargers. 70% On Track 7/1195 6130196 ti Operations Administration 3 Measurement Projects r 3 € 2 a @ 0 1 r Z � 0 Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled ra Measurement Title %Complete Status Start End Reduced natural gas cost. NA On Track 7/1195 6/30/96 rr Increase stastraining. 100% Done 711195 6n0/96 Improve employee communications. 100% Done 711/95 6/30196 r r r r✓ Section 7 - Page 13 u 1995-96 3rd Quarter Report W Plant Operations 4 Measurement Projects Ir 4 — W 0 3 a p 2 E 2v1 f 0 Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled Measurement Title %Complete SlaNs Start End Study staffing productivity per Ernst B Young review. 50% On Track 7/1195 Reduce overtime. NIA On Track 7/1195 - RunTreatmentplantcost-effectively. N/A On Track 711/95 - W Reduce biosoads disposal cost. NIA On Track 7/2/95 h.rl Engineering Administration L 2 Measurement Projects 60 2 1 w 0 Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled OW Measurement Title %Complete Status Start End Motllfy Planning S Design organization for E 8 Y recommendations 50% On Track 7/1195 6/301W L Implement all 14 recommendations In CIP Report 30% On Track 711195 - I� W W Section 7 - Page 14 Project Tracking Design Engineering 5 Measurement Projects 5 � a `oi s B E 3 rm2 2 A f 1 d 0 Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled Measurement This %Complete Status Start End Complete 75%of Conn permits in lday,90%in 3 days,100%in 5 100% On Track 7/1/95 6130/96 r Design facilRies which satisfy customer N/A On Track 7/1195 6/30/96 Track and manage$33.5 million CORF project budget N/A Behind 7/1196 61=96 Comply with adopted Master Plan N/A On Track 7/1195 6130/96 .+ Improve submittal process on all new design projects 80% On Track 711195 6/30196 Engineering Planning 3 Measurement Projects 3 9 Sm2 -- a E d E Z n 1 b QEAI I Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled Measurement Tide %Complete Status Start End Complywdh adopted Master Plan 75% On Track 7/1195 6130195 Track and manage budget and schedule 75% On Trade 711195 6130196 Update"as-built"information 75% On Track 711195 6/30/96 Section 7 - Page 15 L 1995-96 3rd Quarter Report I 6w Construction Management 3 Measurement Projects j 4 L � 3 2 - I. i1 0 LJ Mead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled Moasurement TlBe %Complete Status Start End W Revise the record drawing process of new construction projects. 75% On T.& 7/1195 - Improve shop drewings submission process on all construction projects. 75% On Track 711195 - Keep construction staff up to date on building code and standards 75% On Tack 711195 - Abd i W L L I IW W 1 6w L Intl Section 7- Page 16 L I COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California Finance Department Accounting Division (714) 962-2411 mailing address: P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 street address: 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 9 2 708-701 8 CSDOC 03196 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING MAY 22, 1996 Agenda Item (16): Consideration of the following actions re Bayside Drive Pump Station Sewage Spill on February 22, 1996: (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Report dated May 15, 1996. (b) Consideration of motion to receive and file Administrative Civil Liability Complaint No. 96-3 issued by California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region, relative to the Bayside Drive Pump Station Sewage Spill on February 22, 1996. Summary As you may know, the Districts has received a Complaint from the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) assessing Administrative Civil Liability for the sewage spill on February 22, 1996, which resulted from the failure at the Bay Bridge Pump Station. The Complaint charges the Districts with violating the California Water Code and provisions of our NPDES (National Pollution Discharge Elimination System) ocean discharge permit by spilling sewage into homes and into Newport Bay. A maximum fine of$410,000 was possible under the provisions of the Water Code, but the RWQCB assessed a fine of$50,000. In determining the amount of the fine, the RWQCB took into consideration the Districts' long history of outstanding compliance, the Districts' response to the residents who were affected, and other factors allowed by the Water Code. Staff discussions between the two agencies Indicated that the RWQCB's most significant concern was that the Districts' staff did not take immediate action after receiving the alarm from the pump station; something they felt could be indicative of inadequate training. The Districts has addressed this issue in its follow-up with the RWQCB. A hearing on the Complaint is scheduled for the RWQCB's regular meeting on May 21, 1996. The Complaint allows the Districts to waive the hearing by paying the fine before May 17. Staff believe that the Complaint and the amount of the fine are reasonable, indeed very low, given the seriousness of the spill. Nevertheless, staff was uncomfortable recommending payment of the fine in order to avoid the hearing. If there are members of the public who wish to address the RWQCB on the matter, preventing the hearing will leave those people without an opportunity to participate in the process. While the public can submit written comments without a hearing, those comments would not be considered by the RWQCB in a public forum. Joint Board Chair Cox and the General Manager decided that the Districts should not waive the opportunity for a public hearing. Staff will be present at the hearing to discuss the seriousness of the incident and indicate that the Districts do not oppose either the substance of the Complaint or the amount of the fine. Staff will also respond to questions from the RWQCB and the public if appropriate. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends to receive and file Staff Report dated May 15, 1996 and to receive and file Administrative Civil Liability Complaint No. 96-3 issued by California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region, relative to the Bayside Drive Pump Station Sewage Spill on February 22, 1996. 5/15/96 JAWPDOMMAGDOWY 8 Aa H JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING MAY 22, 1996 Agenda Item (17): FAHR96-25: Consideration of actions relative to introduction of proposed Ordinances increasing sewer connection fees and annexation fees. Summary: Al the April Joint Boards meeting, the Directors approved the Finance Administration and Human Resources Committee recommendation to increase capital facilities connection fees and annexation fees for 1996-97. At the meeting, the Committee Chair reported that each property connected to a sewer system in each of the Districts, except District No. 14, pays an annual sewer use fee which partially finances operating, maintenance and replacement (OM&R) costs used to fund sewerage system improvements. (Properties in District No. 14 are billed by the IRWD.) Each of those Districts, except District No. 13, also receives a share of the ad valorem property tax which is applied to debt service. New development must pay a one-time sewer connection fee which finances capital expansion of the sewerage system. Again, District No. 14 is the exception because IRWD pays its share of capital expansion. One-time annexation fees are charged to the owners of properties who desire to become a part of the Districts to receive sewerage service. The District Resolutions and Ordinances governing the fees provide for an annual adjustment based upon changes in an Enaineerina News-Record - Los Angeles Construction Cost Index (ENRLA) from year-to-year. In the case of capital facilities connection fees, the proposed fees for each District will be $2,360 per residential unit, an increase of $10; and $472 per 1,000 square feet of commercialfindustrial development, an increase of $2 per 2,000 square feet. Only District Nos. 2, 3, 4, 7 and 11 have territories within their spheres of influence which could annex in order to receive sewerage service. Each District has a unique annexation fee based upon its individual financial situation. The fees range from $3,159 per acre with a tax exchange agreement, to $6,407 per acre without. The change in the ENRLA governing annexation fees was .2%, causing an increase of between $6 and $13 per acre. Recommended Action The increase in annexation fees is automatic in Districts 2, 3, 5, 7 and 11 and no action is required. As advised last month, the connection fee increase is subject to the Ordinance process. Tonight is the first step in that process with the "first reading." If approved, the Ordinance will be returned next month for final adoption. J iW P o oC193 W a99VNMV9a6.17 a �m April 10, 1996 Revised May 14, 1996 STAFF REPORT FAHR96-25: 1996-97 Sewer Use, Connection Fee, and Annexation Fee Recommendations Surnma Each property connected to a sewer system in each of the Districts, except District No. 14, pays an annual sewer use fee which partially finances operating, maintenance and replacement (OM&R) costs used to fund sewerage system improvements. (Properties in District No. 14 are billed by the IRWD.) Each of those Districts, except District No. 13, also receives a share of the ad valorem property tax which is applied to debt service. New development must pay a one-time sewer connection fee which finances capital expansion of the sewerage system. Again, District No. 14 is the exception because IRWD pays its share of capital expansion. For the last four years, because of the poor economic climate, staff recommended and the Boards agreed not to increase user or connection fees over the 1991-92 rates. In order to do this, certain Districts' programs have been scaled back. Subsequent to the 1992-93fee adoption, the Governor and State Legislature confiscated a portion of the Districts' property taxes and shifted them to help finance schools. After lengthy deliberations, the Boards of Districts 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 and 7 concluded that they had no really viable alternative but to increase the user fees to make up for the confiscation of 1992-93 property taxes by the state. The total amount shifted by the state was $3.5 million. Although the Districts have the ability to increase fees to pay for the rising costs of wastewater services, the staff is sensitive to the continuing economic situation and the very difficult financial problems our member agencies are struggling with. The General Manager has directed staff to prepare a budget for 1996-97 that will allow sewer use fees not to be increased. These are the same rates adopted for 1995-96. BACKGROUND During the 1980's and early 1999s, each of the Districts was required to consider the adoption of a sewer use fee for ongoing operations, maintenance and rehabilitation C800C 0 P.O.Box 6127 0 Founhln Valley.CA 92728-8127 0 (714)962-2411 FAHR96-25 Page 2 April 10, 1996 costs. Although property taxes, connection fees and federal and state construction grants had historically been the major sources of financing of Districts' activities, they became inadequate during the past decade. After the passage of Proposition 13, all ad valorem property tax revenue has been used in the Operating Funds for maintenance, operations and rehabilitation. Beginning in 1991-92, ad valorem property tax receipts were dedicated to be first used to repay the principal and interest due for COP issues. No property tax revenue has been directly available for capital improvements. The costs of providing service have risen beyond the ability of the property tax apportionments to keep pace with the increasingly stringent requirements of the federal, state and regional regulatory agencies for wastewater treatment to protect public health and the environment. In addition to new regulatory requirements, cost increases are also attributable to inflation, and to additional flows generated by the natural population increases from the excess of births over deaths and in-migration and additional residential, commercial and industrial development. Federal and state assistance from the clean water grant program has essentially been eliminated by Congress because of federal funding problems. All Districts except Nos. 13 and 14 currently receive a reduced historical allocation of the 1% basic property tax levy equal to approximately 2.7% of the 1% basic levy. The typical property owner pays $27 per year in property taxes to the Districts. District No. 13 is fully funded by user fees and District No. 14 is fully funded by the IRWD. FUTURE FINANCING PROJECTIONS As a part of the rate setting process, staff has analyzed statements of Projected Cash Flows for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13 prepared in accordance with the adopted "2020 VISION" Financial Plan recommendations, adjusted to reflect changing circumstances. Under the Plan, each District's share of the treatment plant construction, and its respective trunk sewer construction projects are to be financed by a combination of increased connection fees to pay for new capacity and borrowing to pay for rehabilitation and improved treatment. Debt retirement and operating and maintenance costs are to be paid by a combination of property taxes and the annual sewer use fees, under the following assumptions: 1. Renewal of NPDES Permit and Continuation of Current Treatment Levels (301(h) Waiver) This scenario represents the minimum probable level of construction, rehabilitation and operations and maintenance costs, while the new Strategic Plan is being developed. For the first five years of the planning period, the differences between renewal of our existing permit and full secondary treatment are not FAHR96-25 Page 3 April 10, 1996 significant. Increased annual flow projections and new sewer service connections have been revised downward from the 1989 Master Plan to reflect current and expected economic development and levels of flow in accordance with 1994 engineering study. 2. Connection Fees The capital facilities connection fee includes the cost of future and existing facilities on a per unit basis. The reason to include future costs is that any new flow will require new, additional facilities and capacity. The Board-approved connection fee policy provides for an automatic annual adjustment of fees to reflect changes in the Engineering News Record-LA construction cost index. These fees have not been increased since 1991-92. Connection fees are uniform throughout the Districts. Staff is recommending that the fees for 1996-97 increase from the 1995-96 rates of$2,350 per residential unit and $470 per 1,000 square feet of floor area for non-residential properties, in accordance with Board policy. Based upon the actual increase in the ENRLA index, the new fees would be $2,360 per residential unit and $472 per 1,000 square feet of non-residential buildings. 3. Debt/Borrowina Through 1998-99, all of the Districts except Nos. 13 and 14 are expected to issue additional COP-type debt to meet a portion of Joint Works treatment facilities improvements. Borrowing has been a part of the long-range financial plan for capital improvements since 1979 when the policy of using all property tax revenues for operations, maintenance and rehabilitation was implemented. Extensive use of the now discontinued federal and state Clean Water Grant Program enabled the Districts to stretch out their reserves and other income and to generally avoid borrowing until 1990. Three primary reasons to issue debt are: to protect and to preserve capital reserves; to avoid major increases and fluctuations in user fees from year-to-year; and to spread the cost of facilities over their useful lives. The preliminary cash flow projections include additional COP issues that will be required to meet capital project award and cash flow requirements through 1998-99. Any COP issue will need to be approved by the Boards. No COPS are expected to be issued until the completion of the Strategic Plan. FAHR96-25 Page 4 April 10, 1996 4. Reserves As a part of the financial plan developed by the team of Directors, staff and consultants, the Boards have implemented a plan to build reserves for certain future events. The current reserve policy calls for Dry Period Funding Reserves, Contingency Reserves, Capital Project Reserves, Insurance Reserves, Environmental Requirement Reserves, and Debt Service Reserves. The projected reserve levels have been allowed to decrease to coincide with the reduced capital improvement budget projections. 5. Capital Improvement Projects As the Directors are aware, the Districts are continuing to experience total flows below those of previous years. This flow reduction and the economic climate have caused staff to review the timing of the capital improvement program. Projects for additional capacity and improved treatment are proposed to be delayed, pending completion of the new Strategic Plan. 6. Ad Valorem Property Taxes The cash flow projections are based on the continuing receipt of ad valorem property taxes at the same level as allocated by the County for 1995-96. 1996-97 USER FEE AND CONNECTION FEE RECOMMENDATIONS Taking all of the above assumptions into consideration and the current and projected near-term economic climate, staff is again preparing an overall reduced budget. The portion of each individual District's total operations, maintenance and COP service budget, determined largely by the Joint Operating Fund budget to operate and maintain the treatment and disposal facilities, is approximately 80%. Keeping this significant portion of the operating budget constant and rescheduling certain capital projects, thereby minimizing additional borrowing and subsequent repayment will allow the Districts to maintain the 1995-96 user fee rates for 1996-97. The following table shows the single-family residential annual user fee rates and one-time connection fees for 1996-97 that were anticipated when last year's budget was adopted, the predicted rates in the "2020 VISION" Master Plan, and the revised rates now proposed. A change to the one-time connection fee will require a new Ordinance to be adopted. FAHR96-25 Page 5 April 10, 1996 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL FEES 1996-97 Anticipated When Predicted 95-96Budget Was in District Adopted - "2020 VISION" Proposed 96-97 1 $100.00 $125.00 $83.24 2 75.00 100,00 71.52 3 '75.00 126.00 73.89 5 - 100.00 125.00 96.75 6 80.00 100.00 76.47 7 52.00 75.00 50.09 11 72.00 175.00 60.00 13 100.00 165.00 100.00 Weighted Average •E $75.42 $113A5 $71 fie All Districts • a - Capital Fees R Connection Fees `' $2,470.00 $3,020.00 $2,360 1996-97 ANNEXATION FEE RECOMMENDATIONS One-time annexation fees are charged to owners of all properties who desire to annex to the Districts to receive sewerage service. The fee is increased for those properties for which a tax-exchange agreement cannot be negotiated with the County (a result of Proposition 13/AB 8). The fees in effect for 1995-96 for those Districts with annexable territory follow: 1995-96`Per Acre Annexation Fee' W/Tax W/O Tax District Exchange Exchange 2 $2,938 $3,929 3 3,171 4,161 5 3,071 4,106 7 2,918 3,904 IL-1 5 312 6 398 The annexation fee policy resolutions approved in 1991 provide for an automatic annual FAHR96-25 Page 6 April 10, 1996 increase in the per acre fee on each July 1, based upon the change in the Engineering News Record (ENR) Construction Cost index for the preceding March-to-March time period. The intent of this section is to provide for automatic fee adjustments each year to reflect the increasing costs of constructing sewerage facilities. Based upon the actual .2% change in the ENR index March 1995 to March 1996, the fees for 1996-97, would be calculated to be: v . M, ezatibriOee 111,. E �WfTax W/O Tau bis et Exchange Exchange '. 2 $3,214 $4,299 3 3,469 4,553 5 3,359 4,492 7 3,192 4,271 11 5,327 6,413 A literal reading of the 1991 resolutions does not allow the flexibility of not increasing the annexation fee unless the Boards take a specific action deferring the automatic increase. In the interest of full disclosure, staff wanted to bring this fee adjustment to the Committees along with the others. Staff recommends the Annexation Fee, paid for properties currently outside of the Districts, be allowed to automatically increase in an amount determined by the change in the ENRI.A in accordance with adopted Board policy. GGS:Ic J:WVPO WINCRANE�.MTGTAHR. 6 TAF ".8 RFAHR8 Uo-lo-so 11COrm rcum Mill, eUUUSUMr, arch lu co[UJoo ruuaiuit DISTRICTS 1, 2, 3, 6, 11, 13 AND 14 ORDINANCE NO. ^_ AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AMENDING SECTION 702 OF ORDINANCE NO. ESTABLISHING WASTEWATER DISC14ARGE REGULATIONS RELATING TO INCREASED CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION CHARGES The Board of Direction;of County Sanitation District No._of Orange County, California does hereby ORDAIN: Section 1: Finding. The Boar of Directors finds that the cost at providing the service for which the Capital Facilities Connection Charges are imposed, has increased since the establishment of the present fee In 1992, and the amount of the increase set forth herein does not exceed the reasonable cost of providing the service. Spclo : Section 702 of Ordinance No._is hereby amended to read as follows: 702. DISTRICT NO, CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION CHARGES A. District Connection Perms Requimg No application for a permit for n connection to a District so vi facility of to any sewerage facility which discharges into a District sewerage facility shall be considered until a District capital facilities connection charge is paid by the applicant No connection permit shell be issued unless them is an established use of the property to be served or a valid building permit issued which eslablishos the use of said property. B. District Connection Charae Amounts (1) Capital facilities connection charge for new construction, dwelling buildings: For each new dwelling unit constructed, the capital facilities connection charge shall be$2,300 per dwelling unit (2) Capital facilities connection charge for existing dwelling buildings: For the connection of each existing dwelling unit, the=pilot facilities connection charge shall be $2,360 per dwelling unit. i UO"10'30 11CUOra rxua xuuxxx, euOUxorr, orxx IO $01MO CUU4/UIC (3) Capital facilites connection charge for new construction and existing structures, other than dwelling buildings: For all other new wnstru*(ion, including, but not limited to,commercial and industrial buildings, hotels and motels and public buildings, the capital facilities connection charge shall be$480 per 1.000 square feet of floor area contained within such wnetruction,provided that the minimum capital facilities connection charge for such new construction shall be$2,360. (4) Capital facilities connection charge for replacement buildings[ For new construction replacing former buildings, the capital facilities connection charge shall be calculated on the same basis as provided in paragraphs (1)and(3) above. If such replacement construction is commenced within two (2)years after demolition or destruction of the loaner building, a credit against such charge shall be allowed and shall be the equivalent capital facilities connection charge for the building being demolished or destroyed. calculated on the basis of current charges for new construction. In no case shall such credit exceed the capital facilities connection charges. (5) Capital facilities connection charges for additions or alterations of existing buildings: In the case of structures where further new construction or alteration is made to increase the occupancy of family dwelling buildings or the area of buildings to be used for other than family dwelling buildings, the capital facilities connection charge shall be $2,380 for each dwelling unit added or created, and, in the case of new construction other than family dwelling buildings, it shall be$450 per 1,000 square feet of additional floor sees contained within such new construction, provided such new construction shall contain additional plumbing fbiture units." section 3: Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect sixty(60) days after adoption. 2 Utl-10'90 U4:U8rn PAUa AUUAAS, aUUUAUPP, JPAA lU fllujoo ruuu/ulC Section 4_ SeverabiliM. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application to any person or circumstances is held invalid by order of Court,the remainder of the Ordinance or the application of such provision to other persons or other circumstances shall not be effected. Se it 5: Codification. The Secretary of the Board shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall muse a summary to be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the District, as required by law, PASSED AND ADOPTED by the affirmative vote Of not less than twatnirds of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No._of Orange County. California. at a regular meeting hold 1990. Chairman of the Boom of Directors of County Sanitation District No._of Orange County, California ATTEST: Secretary of the Board of Directors Of County Sanitation District No._ of Orange County, California 3 Wlo-ue 114:102 PlUa auuaaa, euuuXUt?. aria lu soLUJoo ruulluuJ DISTRICT NO. 5 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALJFORNIA AMENDING SECTION 702 OF ORDINANCE NO. 526 ESTABLISHING WASTEWATER DISCHARGE REGULATIONS RELATING TO INCREASED CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION CHARGES The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California does hereby ORDAIN: Section : Findinb. The Board of Directors fins that the cost of providing the service for which the Capital Facilities Connection Charges are imposed, has increased since the establishment of the present fee in 1992, and the amount of the increase set forth hereii does not exceed the reasonable cost of providing the service. Se 'on 2: Section 702 of Ordinance No. 526 is hereby amended to read as foilcWs: "702. DISTRIC NO CAPITAL FAOILITIeC CONNECTION CHARGES A. Dmhid Connection Permit Required NO application for a permit for a connection to a District sewerage facility or to any sewerage facility which discharges into a District sewerage facility shall be considered until a District capital facilities connection charge Is paid by the applicant No connection permit shall be issued unless there is an established use of the property to be served or a valid building permit issued which establishes the use of said property. B. District Connection Charge Amounts (1) Capital facilities connection charge for new construction, dwelling buildings: For each new dwelling unit constructed, the capital facilities connection charge shall be$2,360 per dwelling unit. (2) Capital facilities connection charge for existing dwelling buildings: For the connection of each existing dwelling unit, the capital facilities connection charge shall be $2,360 per dwelling unit. 1 0-10-110 WWII rxux xuuxxx, wuuijxuPr, brxx lu uolujou ruusl Utz (3) Capital facilities connection theme for new construction and existing structures,other than dwelling buildings: For a0 other new construction, including, but not limited to,commercial and industrial buildings, hotels and motels and public buildings,the capital facilities connection charge shall be$430 per 1.000 square foot of floor area contained within such construction, provided that the minimum capital facilities connection charge for such new construction shall be$2,3uu. (4) Capital facilities connection charge for replacement buildings: For new construction replacing former buildings, the capital facilities connection charge shall be calculated on the same basis as provided in paragraphs(1) and(3) above. If such replacement construction is commenced within two(2)years after demolition or destruction of the fermor building, a credit against such charge shall be allowed and shall be the equivalent capital facilities connection charge for the building being demolished or destroyed,calculated on the basis of arrant charges for new construction. In no case shell such credit exceed the caphal facilities connection charges. (5) Capital facilities connection charges for additions or alterations of existing buildings: In the case of structures where further new construction or alteration is made to increase the occupancy of family dwelling buildings or the area of buildings to be used for other than family dwelling buildings,the capital facilities connection charge shall be$2,360 for each dwelling unit added or created, and, in the cone of new mnstrucion other than family dwelling buildings, it shell be$430 per 1,000 square foot of additional floor area contained within such new construction, provided such new construction shall contain additional plumbing fbdure units. 2 Ub-lb-ub U4:11bi'll FGUb JuMb, aUUUNUyp MA fu 10tU3ab rUUb/Utt (6) Payment of capital faciltes connection charges shall be required at the time of Issuance of the building permit for all construction within the District, excepting in the case of a building legally exempt from the mquiromerd of obtaining a building permit in the City of Newport Beach. The payment of the capital facilities connection charge for such exempt buildings will be required at the time of, or prior to,the issuance of a plumbing oonnectio.. permit for any construction within the District." Section Effective Cate: This Ordinance shall take effect sixty(60)days after adoption. Section Saverabilitr. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application to arty person or circumstances is hold invalid by order of Court, the remainder of the Ordinance or the application of such provision to other persons or other circumstances shall not be affected. Section 5: Certification. The Secretary of the Board shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause a summary to be published in a newspaper of general circulation In the District, as required by law. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the affirmative vote of not loss than two-thirds of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California,at a regular meeting held , 1996. Chairman of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County. California ATTEST: Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No.5 of Orange County, California 3 Ub"Iti-tlb U4abra rxua xuuxix, euuuxurr, Jrxx III tlbtujou rUUC/uut DISTRICT NO. 7 r ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AMENDING SECTION 702 OF ORDINANCE NO. 727 ESTABLISHING WASTEWATER DISCHARGE REGULATIONS RELATING TO INCREASED CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION CHARGES The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of orange County, califomin does hereby ORDAIN: Section I Findinfl. The Board of Directors finds that the cost of providing the service for which the Capital Facilities Connection Charges are imposed, has Increased since the establishment of the preserd foe in 1992, and the amount of the Increase set forth herein does not exceed the reasonable cost of providing the service. Gection 2: Section 702 of Ordinance No. 727 is hereby amended to mad as follows: 702. DISTRICT NO. CAPITAL FACILMEES CONNECTION CHARGES A. Dlebict Connection Permit Required No application for a permit for a connection to a District sewerage facility or to any sewerage reality which discharges into a District sewerage facility shall be considered until a District capital facilities connection charge is paid by the applicant No connection permit shell be issued unless there is an established use of the property to be served or a valid building permit issued which establishes the use of said property. B. District Connection Chame Amounts (1) Capital facilities connection charge for new construction, dwelling buildings: For each new dwelling unit constructed, the capital facilities connection charge shall be&2,3W per dwelling unit. (2) Capital facilities connection charge for existing dwelling buildings: For the connection of each existing dwelling unit, the capital facilities connection charge shall be b2.WD per dwelling unit. 1 U3-10-e0 04:00ra rsUa KUURn6, WVUVXUrr„1rLa lu SUUJ00 rU10/Ull (3) Capital facilities connection charge for new construction and extsting structures, other than dwelling buildings: For all other new construction, including, but not limited to, commercial and industrial buildings, hotels and motels and public buildings. the capital facilities connection charge shall be$480 per 1,000 square feet of floor area contained within surh construction, provided that the minimum capital facilities connection charge for such new construction shell be 32,860. (4) Capital facilities connection charge for replacement buildings: For new construction replacing forcer buildings, the capital facilities connection charge shall be calculated on the same basis as provided in paragraphs (1)and (3)above. If such replacement construction is commenced withln two(2)years after demolition or destruction of the former building, a credit against such charge shall be allowed and shall be the equivalent capital facilities connection charge for the bulldtng being demolished or destroyed, calculated on the basis of currant charges for new construction. In no case shall such credit exceed tiro cepllal facilities connection charges. (5) Capital facilities connection charges for additions or alterations of crusting buildings: In the case of structures where further new construction or alterative is made to increase the occupancy of family dwelling buildings or the area of buildings to be used for other than family dwelling buildings,the capital facilities connection charge shall be$2,360 for each dwelling unit added or created. and, in the ease of now construction other than family dwelling buildings, it shall be $480 per 1,000 square feet of additional floor area contained within such new construction, provided such new construction shall contain additional plumbing fixture units. 2 Ub-lb-Ub U4:U5?1 ykUa kuUSAB, auueHurr, JPeA IU dbLUJUD rulllufc (6) Truck capital facilities connection charge, residential uses: Family dwelling unit: $6 per front fool for the real property fronting on and connecting to a trunk sewer, provided that no such charge shall be less than$400, plus the applicable regular capital facilities connection charge for dwelling units hereinabove specified. (n Trunk capital facilities connection charge, commercial or industrial establishments: $10 per front foot for the real property fronting on and connecting to a trunk sewer, provided that no such front foot charge shall be less than$500 plus the applicable regular capital facilities connection charge for new construction and existing structures other than dwelling buildings hereinabove specified. (6) Capital facilities connection charge, offsite sewers net a part of Master Plan relative to reimbursement agreement: The charges for connections to oft-sae samara which are not included as part of the District Master Plan and for which a Non-Master Plan Reimbursement Agreement has been entered into between the District and the property owner shell be in the amount provided for in said Agroomunt. The amount set forth in said Agreement shall be the amount due whether the original Agreement is still In force, has been extended, or has expired. The capital facilities connection charges shall be in addition to any other charges hereinabove established for the property connecting to said facilities. (9) Assessment District capital facilities connection charge: The regular capital facilities connection charges provided in the preceding subsections of this section, plus a sum of money equal to the assessment charge,without interest, er Treasurefa charge which would have been made against the real property on which said improvements are located had said real property been assessed 3 Ub-I5-9b 114:1.101'9 Wit XUUM, WUUUkorr, drxh 1U 301UJOD rul4lull within the Assessment District which constructed or acquired the Assessment Disbicl sewer to which connection is made. SoMion 9: Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take eRoa surly(e0)days after adoption. Sadon Severablity: If any provision of this Ordinance or the application to any person or circumstances Is held invalid by order of Court, the remainder of the Ordinance or the application of such provision to other persons or other circumstances shall not be affected. sacfien 5: Certification. The Secretary of the Board shall eaniy to the adoption of this Ordinance and shell cause a summary to be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the District as required by law. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the affirmative vote of not less than two-thirds of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County,California, at a regular meeting held , 1996. Chairman of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, Callfomla ATTEST: Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No.7 of Orange County, California 4 DATE PAID 04/17/95 05/01/96 HANDWRITES AU DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - 573,666.89 305.327.31 251.397.49 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 1.450.407.02 328.632.67 4,333.46 Joint Working Capital Fund - 161,15548 279,915.83 0.00 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 5,043-93 71,860.61 93.221.91 DISTRICT NO.1 - 894.OD 2,526.70 0.00 DISTRICT N0.2 - 2.007.16 25,755.01 423.00 DISTRICT NO - 9.541.80 963,295.90 90.00 DISTRICT NO.5 - 177.00 5,650.48 538.13 DISTRICT NO, - 24.115.00 1,189.01 0.00 DISTRICT NO, - 882,80 9,780.91 0.00 DISTRICT NO.11 - 5.097,40 8,534.00 0.00 DISTRICT NO.13 - 0.00 35.61 0.00 DISTRICT NO.14 - 0.00 508.93 0.00 DISTRICTS NO, 1 8 7 JOINT - 0,00 0.00 0.00 DISTRICTS NO,3 8 11 JOINT - 0.00 0.00 0.00 DISTRICTS NO,5 8 6 JOINT - 243,282.06 147,226.53 0.00 DISTRICTS NO.6&7 JOINT - 0.00 213.52 0.00 DJSTRICTSNO 7814JOINT - 0.00 16.71 0.00 TOTALS 2,476,270.54 2,150,367.83 350.003.99 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4112196 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04117195 POSTING DATE O4/17196 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 161202 AGU $17.50 PUBLICATION 151203 ASL CONSULTING ENGINEERS $423.00 ATWOOD SUBTRUNK PLAN PREPARATION 151204 ATB T-MEGACOM SERVICE $2.737.02 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 151206 ATB T-CELLULAR CRSR $5.05 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 151206 A-Z LOGIC SYSTEMS $356.98 LAB SUPPLIES 161207 ABANNER IDEA $59.26 OFFICE SUPPLIES 151208 ADVANCED COOLING TECHNOLOGY $420.00 ELECTRIC PARTS 151209 AIR B WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOC. $296.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 151210 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $36,664.58 08M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.O.S.9-09 151211 AIR 8 WASTE MGMT.ASSOC. $66.44 PUBLICATION 151212 ASCE CONTINUING EDUCATION $165.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING 151213 AMERICAN AIRLINES $448.40 TRAVEL SERVICES 151214 THE BOND BUYER $858.77 SUBSCRIPTION 151215 AMERICAN PAYROLL ASSOC. $124.95 PUBLICATION 151216 AMERICAN SIGMA $20,628.55 TESTING SUPPLIES 151217 AMERICAN VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS $9,695.86 COMPUTER PARTS 151218 AMOCO ENERGY TRADING $47,266.96 NATURAL GAS MO 628.95 151219 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION $24,057.00 SEWER REPAIRS 151220 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL $1.260.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 151221 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $2,270.20 NOTICES S ADS 151222 APPLE ONE $5,958.92 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 151223 AQUATIC BIOASSAY 8 CONSULTANTS $5.906.00 LAB SERVICES 151224 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT $2,200.74 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 161225 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE,INC. $310.40 TOXIC WASTE REMOVAL 151228 ASSOCIATED CONCRETE PRODUCTS 5290.93 BUILDING MATERIALS 151227 ATKINMONES COMPUTER SERVICE $321.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT 151228 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $3,632.37 PAYROLL SERVICES 151229 AWARDS B TROPHIES $33.40 PLAQUES 151230 BKK LANDFILL $2.272.16 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 151231 E S BABCOCK&SONS INC $1,024.00 LAB ANALYSIS 151232 BANANA BLUEPRINT $1,240.96 PRINTING M.0.11-07-94 151233 BANCROFT-WHITNEY CO.. $340.21 PUBLICATION 151234 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $378.59 BATTERIES 151235 BAUERCOMPRESSOR $593.22 COMPRESSOR PARTS 151236 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $3,421.82 LAB SUPPLIES 151237 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $329.15 TRUCK WASH TICKETS 151238 A BIEDERMAN,INC. $918.71 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 151239 WT BILLARD $345.11 BUILDING REPAIRS 151240 BIO-GRO DIVISION $45,871.58 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 4-28A5 151241 BISHOPS SANITARY $420.23 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 151242 SOUSA RADIATOR SERVICE $193.95 TRUCK REPAIRS 151243 BONA-RUES 5498.88 TRUCK PARTS 151244 BOOTBARN $360.63 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 151245 CA P $149,00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 151246 C.L.TECHNOLOGY $720.00 GAS ANALYSIS SERVICES 151247 CS COMPANY $7,782.49 PLUMBING SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4112/96 PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/17/95 POSTING DATE 04/17/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 151248 CALIF ASSOC,OF SAN.AGENCIES $130.00 WORK CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 151249 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $977.66 SERVICE AGREEMENT 151250 CALIF.DEBT ADVISORY $125.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 151251 CALIFORNIA LABORATORIES 8 DEV $704.00 FUME HOODS DISPOSAL 151252 CALLAN ASSOCIATES,INC. $4.978.78 INVESTMENT ADVISOR SERVICES 151253 CAMALI CORP. $2.569.61 SERVICE AGREEMENT 151254 CAPITAL ENQUIRY,INC. $186.30 PUBLICATION 151255 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $4.806.15 ENGINEERING SERVICES P138,J-33 151255 CASA $260.00 WORK CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 161257 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $796.31 OFFICE FURNITURE 151258 CENTURY SAFETY INST.8 SUPPLY $1,635.11 SAFETY SUPPLIES 161259 CHEMWEST,INC. $96.84 PUMP PARTS 151260 KIMBERLY CHRISTENSEN $1,113.34 TRAINING EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 151261 CLEMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL $14,000.00 CONSULTANT-LANDFILL PROJECT MO 7.31-95 151262 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $220.84 SERVICE AGREEMENT 151263 COUCH 8 SONS $59,283.80 CONSTRUCTION M444 151264 COMMUNICATIONS PERFORMANCE GRP $4,000.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 151265 COMPUSERVE $305.39 COMPUTER SERVICES 151266 CONNELL GM PARTS/DIV. $185.63 TRUCK PARTS 161267 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $2,152.83 ELECTRIC PARTS 151268 CONSOLIDATED PLASTICS CO. $341.97 PUMP 151269 CONSUMER PIPE WEST PLUMBING SUPPLIES 151270 CONTINENTAL EQUIPMENT B SUPPLY $66.93 TOOLS 151271 COOK BROTHERS $437.37 VALVE 151272 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $1.021.90 ENGINE PARTS 151273 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $359.35 TRUCK PARTS 151274 CRANE PRO SERVICES $415.09 CRANE REPAIR 15IZ75 CSUS FOUNDATION $108.26 OPERATOR TRAINING 151270 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION $230.02 FUEL TAXES 151277 DME,INC. $555.9B COMPRESSOR PARTS 151278 DAILY PILOT $222.00 NOTICES BADS 151279 DELL MARKETING L.P. $16,189.98 COMPUTER 151280 DEL MAR ANALYTICAL $950.00 LABANALYSIS 151281 DEZURICK AND/OR CS CO. $2.025.66 VALVES 151282 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. 5392.51 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 151283 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $940.00 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 151284 OVALS SALES $81.00 FITTINGS 151285 ESP NORTH $665.75 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 161286 ENCHANTER,INC. $2.800.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5.2495 151287 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $887.70 LAB SUPPLIES 151288 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE CENTER $399.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 161289 FLUID TECH.SALES $226.91 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 151290 F 8 M WELDING,INC. $8,566.12 HAND RAILS 161291 FMC CORPORATION $41,054.34 HYDROGEN PEROXIDE MO 9-1494 151292 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE 54,181.25 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-991 151293 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $33.25 AIR FREIGHT FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/12/96 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID W17/95 POSTING DATE 04/17/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 161294 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $181.11 FILTERS 151296 FIRST CHOICE $2.981.34 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT 151298 FORMA SCIENTIFIC,INC. $9.203.25 LAB SUPPLIES 161297 CLIFFORD A FORKERT $1,812.50 SURVEYING SERVICES MO 641-95 151298 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $309.72 PHOTO SUPPLIES 151299 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $11,101.80 WATER USE 151300 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $225.74 PAINT SUPPLIES 151301 FRANKLIN ELECTRONIC PUBLISHERS $123.83 PUBLICATIONS 151302 CITY OF FULLERTON $116.16 WATER USE 161303 EST,INC. $12,25&50 OFFICE SUPPLIES 151304 GTE TELEPHONE OPERATIONS $2,184.29 TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT 151305 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $3,363.63 CHEMICALS 151306 GE IND B POWER SYSTEMS $3,699.60 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 151307 GENERAL PETROLEUM $9,042.86 GASOLINE 151308 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1,051.39 TELEPHONE SERVICES 161309 GIERLICH-MITCHELL,INC. $2.055.94 PUMP PARTS 151310 GRASBY S.T.I. $1.169.29 ENGINE PARTS 151311 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $201.09 PRINTING 151312 DGA CONSULTANTS $6.340.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.OAA Al 151313 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $96.32 TRUCK PARTS 151314 HARBOUR ENGINEERING $5,191.80 MECHANICAL PARTS 151315 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $129.15 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 151316 HAULAWAYCONTAMERS $2,190.00 CONTAINER RENTALS 161317 PL HAWN CO,INC. $6,245.19 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 161318 HELLO $218.95 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 151319 HELPMATES PERSONNEL SERVICES $7,634.01 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 151320 HILTI,INC. $6.185.88 TOOLS 151321 HOME DEPOT $640.64 SMALL HARDWARE 151322 IRS HUGHES CO,INC. $256.66 PAINT SUPPLIES 151323 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $22.323.24 WATER USE 151324 HUNTINGTON AMC/JEEP I RENAULT $178.60 AUTO PARTS 151325 IAML $1,675.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING 151326 IDM CONTROLS,INC. $538.13 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 151327 IPCO SAFETY $869.33 SAFETY SUPPLIES 151328 IMAGING PLUS $550.46 OFFICE SUPPLIES 151329 INDUSTRIAL FILTER MFG. $2,400.00 FILTER 151330 INDUSTRIAL STEAM $1,377.20 PUMP 151331 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $1.334.42 CONNECTORS 151332 ISI INFORTEXT $770.42 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 151333 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. $75.68 TRUCK PARTS 151334 INNOVATION GROUP WEST $5W.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING 161335 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $1.131.48 BATTERIES 151336 IRVINE PHOTO GRAPHICS $13.67 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 151337 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $10.44 WATER USE 151338 J2 PRINTING SERVICES $386.28 PRINTING 151339 JH RECOGNITION CO. $853.17 SERVICE AWARDS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 41IV96 PAGE4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/17/95 POSTING DATE 04/17195 WARRANTNO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 151340 JAMISON ENGINEERING $2,000.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 151341 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $279.46 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 151342 JAYS CATERING $597.34 DIRECTORS MEETING EXPENSE 151343 KALLEENS COMPUTER PRODUCTS $143.67 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 151344 KEMIRON PACIFIC,INC. $170.320.60 FERRIC CHLORIDE MO 9-27-96 151345 KING BEARING,INC. $469.27 MACHINE SUPPLIES 151346 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES 52,055.05 TOOLS 151347 PENNY KYLE $220.06 TRAINING EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 151348 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $1,232.87 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICE 151349 LAMOTTE COMPANY $81.97 SULFIDE TEST KIT 151350 LAWICRANDAL,INC. $1.530.00 SOIL TESTING 7.13.94 151351 ORANGE COUNTY DIVISION $30.75 PUBLICATION 151352 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES $95.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING 151353 LIKE NU TILE $280.00 RESTROOM TILE REPAIR 151354 MEC ANALYTICAL $1,108.00 LABANALYSIS 151355 R.F.MACDONALD CO. $29A5 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 151356 MANDIC MOTORS $45.00 TOWING SERVICES 151357 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $1,259,733.50 CONSTRUCTION Pi-38-2 151358 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $195.42 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 151359 MIKE MCCARTHY BUICK,INC. $17.220.75 NEW TRUCK 151300 DONALD F.MCINTYRE $210.93 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 151361 MIDWAY MFG.&MACHINING $375.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 151362 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3,998.81 UNIFORM RENTALS 151363 MONITOR LABS $120.78 INSTRUMENT 151364 MOODYS INVESTORS SERVICE 57,500.00 COP RATING MAINTENANCE FEES 151365 MORGAN COMPANY $520.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 151360 MORTON SALT $515.36 SALT 161307 SAM MOWBRAY $1,053.42 TRAINING EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 151368 THE NEWS $76.00 SUBSCRIPTION 151369 NICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY $2,935.65 LUBRICANTSIDIESEL FUEL 151370 NORTEL PRODUCT TRAINING $2,080.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 151371 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $1.212.77 SAFETY GLASSES 151372 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $13,217.27 OFFICE SUPPLIES 161373 OLSTEN STAFFING SERVICES $3.554.00 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 161374 ROBERTJ.00TEN $105.00 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 161375 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL $2.707.44 CHEMICALS 151378 ORANGE COUNTY PUMP CO. $4,948.76 PUMPS 151377 ORANGE COURIER $182.95 COURIER SERVICES 151378 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. $339.27 FITTINGS 161379 OXYGEN SERVICE $1,746.70 SPECIALTY GASES 151380 COUNTY OF ORANGE $90.00 AUDIT/CONT.PROCESSING FEE 151381 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $5,743.98 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP 151382 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT $37,753.80 GAP WATER USE M.O.6-9-93 151383 PC SERVICE SOURCE $114.00 PRINTER PARTS 151354 PACIFIC PARTS $6,960.10 INSTRUMENT PARTS 151385 PACIFIC BELL $18.12 TELEPHONE SERVICES FUND NO 9199 • JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/12/% PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04117/95 POSTING DATE 04/17/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 151388 PADGETT - THOMPSON $346.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 151387 PARKHOUSE TIRE,INC. $392.21 TIRES 151388 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 5659.25 REIMS.PETTY CASH 151389 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS 57,418.85 CONSULTING SERVICE 151390 POLYPURE,INC. 520,015.93 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92 151391 POWER SYSTEMS $236.99 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 161392 PROCESS CONTROL SYSTEMS $104.19 REPAIR 151393 PRYOR RESOURCES,INC. $90.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING 151394 PUBLIC SECTOR EXCELLENCE $3150.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING CONSULTANT 151395 RJN GROUP,INC. $995.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 151396 RM CONTROLS $41.41 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 151397 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $2.062.75 TRASH REMOVAL 161398 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO. $241.85 LAB SUPPLIES 151399 REAL TIME SYSTEMS CDR $8,135.2D PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 151400 RED WING SHOES $143.09 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 151401 BOLT DELIVERY $24.00 FREIGHT 151402 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DIST. $2.152.92 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 151403 RENOLD INC. $80.59 MECHANICAL PARTS 151404 RM MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL $373.80 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 151405 RYAN-HERCO $33.46 METAL 151408 JOSEPH T.RYERSON&SON,INC. $1,742.88 METAL PLATES 151407 SAFETY WEST $82A3 INSTRUMENT PARTS 151408 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $1,747.36 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 151400 SARTORIUS CORP. $266.00 LAB SUPPLIES 151410 SCHWING AMERICA,INC. $1.022.70 PUMP PARTS 151411 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTL $16,120.91 OCEAN MONITORING MO 6.28-95 151412 SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS,INC. $975.70 LAB REPAIRS 161413 SEA COAST DESIGNS $309.70 LAB SUPPLIES 151414 CITY OF SEAL BEACH $043.95 WATER USE 151415 SELCO PRODUCTS CO. $367.27 METER 151416 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $1,199.98 TOOLS 151417 SHURELUCK SALES $8,398.48 TOOLS44ARDWARE 181418 SIEMON,LARSON&MARSH $1,228.00 LEGAL SERVICES 151419 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $350.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 151420 THE SMITH GROUP $1,237.30 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 151421 SOUTH COAST WATER $520.00 LAB SUPPLIES 151422 SO CALIF EDISON CO $18.94 POWER 151423 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $1.003.45 NATURAL GAS 151424 SO.CALIFORNIA MARINE INST. $800.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 151425 SPEX CHEMICAL&SAMPLE PREP $1.096.05 LAB SUPPLIES 161428 SRECO FLEXIBLE $6,086.33 SAFETY SUPPLIES 151427 STANDARD&POORS CORP $1.000.00 COP CONTRACT SERVICE 151428 SUPERB ONE-HOUR PHOTO $21.84 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 151420 SUPER CHEM CORP. $1.553.06 CHEMICALS 151430 SUPER ICE CORP. $80.22 LAB SUPPLIES 151431 TESTAR MVS I DIV CERPLEX $431.00 COMPUTER REPAIR FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 4112196 PAGE6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/17/95 POSTING DATE O4/17/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 151432 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $3,360.46 MECHANICAL PARTS 151433 TOSHIBA INTERNATIONAL $1,998.40 INSTRUMENT PARTS 151434 DANIELTREMBLAY $1,939.98 TRAINING EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 151435 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $678.30 TRUCK PARTS 151430 JG TUCKER&SON,INC. $2.000.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS 151437 UNISOURCEWOR BUTLER PAPER $545.23 OFFICE SUPPLIES 151438 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $35.00 PARCEL SERVICES 151439 UNIVOFTEXAS/AUSTIN $500.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 151440 VWR SCIENTIFIC $4.810.19 LAB SUPPLIES 151441 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $63.21 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 161442 VERTEX TECHNOLOGIES,INC. $939.40 FIBER OPTICS 151443 VORTEX INDUSTRIES $925.00 BUILDING REPAIRS 151444 WACKENHUT CORP. $3,389.66 CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS 151445 WAL-CON CONSTRUCTION CO. $232,522.71 CONSTRUCTION 5.37-3 151446 CARL WARREN&CO. $6,043.93 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR 161447 WAXIE $792.77 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 151448 WESTINGHOUSE,ENERGY SER. $1,450.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 151449 WESTIN SANTA CLARA $240.90 HOTEL RESERVATIONS 151450 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $1,445.91 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 151451 WHATMAN $792.09 LAB SUPPLIES 151452 NANCY WHEATLEY $507.24 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 151453 WHESSOE VAREC $565.00 VALVES 151464 JUDITH A.WILSON $77.18 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 151455 WITEG $411.81 LAB SUPPLIES 151456 WOLFE AND ASSOCIATES,INC. $260.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 161457 XEROX CORP. $2.860.58 COPIER LEASES 151458 MOYASAR T.YAHYA $586.40 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT TOTAL CALIMS PAID 04117M $2,476,270.54 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/12 96 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/17/95 POSTING DATE 04/17/95 SUMMARY AMOUNT #1 OPER FUND $894.00 #2 OPER FUND $2.007.16 #3 OPER FUND $2,461.80 #3 CAP FAC FUND $7,090.00 #5 OPER FUND $177.00 #6 OPER FUND 548.00 #6 CAP FAC FUND $24.067.00 #7 OPER FUND $442.15 #7 CAP FAC FUND $440.66 #11 OPER FUND $76.50 #11 CAP FAC FUND $5,020.80 0586 OPER FUND $28.59 #586 CAP FAC FUND $243,253.47 JT OPER FUND $573.866.89 CORP $1,460,407.02 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $5,043.93 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $161.155.48 $2,476,270.54 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 04I29M6 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID O6Ml/96 POSTING DATE 05101/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 151496 ASTD PUBLISHING SERVICE $1,597.50 PUBLICATIONS 151497 ATM AA,INC. $4,906.00 LAB SERVICES 151498 ACADEMIC PRESS $21.50 PUBLICATIONS 151499 ADVANCED ENGINE TECH CORP. $15,720.55 ENGINE TESTING J-19 151500 AMERIDATA $1,073.89 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 151501 AMERICAN AIR FILTER,INC. $282.78 MECHANICAL PARTS 151502 AMSA $525.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 151503 AMSA $526.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING 151504 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION $1,424.04 SEWER REPAIRS 151505 ANALYSTS INC $2,666.39 MECHANICAL PARTS 151606 ANIXTER-DISTRIBUTION $393.56 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 151507 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $1.191.61 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 151608 AWARDS&TROPHIES $48.49 PLAQUES 151509 BKK LANDFILL $2.935.45 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.I0 9-91 151510 BANANA BLUEPRINT $3,129.45 PRINTING M.O.11-07-94 161511 BANK OF AMERICA $20.27 BANKING SERVICES 161512 SHABBIR S.BASRAI $275.19 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 161513 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $96.19 BATTERIES 151514 BAUER COMPRESSOR $127.89 COMPRESSOR PARTS 151515 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $20.00 TRUCK WASH TICKETS 151518 BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS $85.27 LAB EQUIPMENT 151517 BERENSON COMMUNICATIONS 5282.09 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 151518 BEVCUSTER $608.58 MAPS 151519 810GRO DIVISION $41,W3.91 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 4-2695 161620 BLACK EMP.&EDU.JOURNAL $495.00 PUBLICATION 151521 BRITHINEE ELECTRIC $236.41 ELECTRIC PARTS 151522 BROOKS INSTRUMENT DIV. $238.62 INSTRUMENT 151523 BUDGET JANITORIAL $3,330.00 JANITORIAL SERVICES MO 1.12-94 151524 BUSH&ASSOCIATES,INC. $1,O70.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.64&94 151525 C.L.TECHNOLOGY $720.00 GAS ANALYSIS SERVICES 151528 CS COMPANY $1.762.48 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 151627 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH INC. $740.29 LAB SUPPLIES 151628 CALIFORNIA AUTO COLLISION,INC. $338.17 TRUCK BODY REPAIR 151529 THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CA. $195.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING 161530 CASA $130.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING 151531 CENTURY MICRO PRODUCTS $5.989.83 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 151532 CENTURY SAFETY INST.&SUPPLY $89.77 SAFETY SUPPLIES 151533 COAST&OCEAN $18.00 SUBSCRIPTION 151534 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $300.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 151535 COLEMANICASKEY ARCHITECTS $42,177.30 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MO I1-15-95 151536 COLOR ARTS INC $2,814.73 PRINTING SERVICES 151537 COLTON EQUIPMENT CO $402.50 CRANE INSPECTION 151538 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $7,542.50 PUMP PARTS 1515M CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $3,297.71 ELECTRIC PARTS 151540 CONSOLIDATED PLASTICS CO $180.18 LAB SUPPLIES 151541 CONSOLIDATED REPROGRAPHICS $52.15 PRINTING SERVICES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE N129196 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/01/96 POSTING DATE 05/01/W WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 151542 CONSUMER PIPE $595.33 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 151643 CONTINENTAL EQUIPMENT&SUPPLY $177.81 TOOLS 151544 CONTROL DESIGN SUPPLY $223.17 ELECTRIC PARTS 151545 CONTROL SPECIALISTS INC $2D5.72 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 15150 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $1.003.23 ENGINE PARTS 151647 COORDINATED EQUIP CO INC $125.00 CRANE CERTIFICATION 161548 COUNTERPART ENTERPRISES 5829.59 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 151649 COUNTY CLERK $38.00 ANNEXATION FEE 151550 COUNTY CLERK $38.00 ANNEXATION FEE 151551 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $837.70 ELECTRIC PARTS 151552 JAMESCOWAN $108.00 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 161553 CALIFORNIA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE $322.40 PUBLICATIONS 151554 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $19,584.OD UNEMPLOYMENT CHARGES 151555 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION $24.29 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK FEE 151566 DAPPERTIRE $776.51 TIRES 151557 JAMES DARLINGTON $2,887.50 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 151658 DATASTORM $87.46 SOFTWARE 151559 ALBERT W.DAVIES,INC. $936.404.08 CONSTRUCTION 3.3611 151560 TOM DAWES $347.71 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 151561 DE GUELLE&SONS GLASS CO $S4.29 SAFETY GLASS 151552 DELL MARKETING L P. 577,006.96 COMPUTERS 151563 DEL MAR ANALYTICAL $1.410.00 SIOSOLIDS ANALYSIS 151664 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIF. $57,540.31 DENTAL INSURANCE PLAN M.O.1-12-94 151565 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $1.790.81 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 151566 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $116.00 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 151567 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $562.73 PAINT SUPPLIES 151568 ESP NORTH $823.48 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 151569 ENCHANTER,INC. $3,50000 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5-24-96 151570 EXCALIBUR ENTERPRISES $5,279.96 NIGHT VISION VIDEO CAMERA 151671 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $2,696.25 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 161672 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $307.95 AIR FREIGHT 151573 FINE SCIENCE TOOLS INC $90.27 LAB SUPPLIES 151574 FIRST CO&I OR NORTHERN DIST. $156.41 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 151575 FISONS INSTRUMENTS $241.77 SERVICE AGREEMENT 151576 FLEXI-LINERCORP $11.539.44 INSPECTION B REPAIR OF DIGESTER LINING 151577 FLICKINGER CO $998.84 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 151578 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $1.403.56 PHOTO SUPPLIES 151679 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $316.50 PAINT SUPPLIES 151580 FRANCE COMPRESSOR PRODUCT $1,534.33 VALVE GUIDE 151581 FRY'S ELECTRONICS $5,801.03 ELECTRONIC B COMPUTER SUPPLIES 151682 GASB $75.00 PUBLICATION 151583 GST,INC. $8,871.30 OFFICE SUPPLIES 151584 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $630.76 LUMBER/HARDWARE 151585 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1,211.87 TELEPHONE SERVICES 1615W GIERLICH-MITCHELL,INC. $11.510.93 PUMP PARTS 151557 WWGRAINGER,INC. $103.48 COMPRESSOR PARTS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 04/29/96 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID DWI/96 POSTING DATE 05/01/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 1515" GRASSY S.T.I. $1.121.75 ENGINE PARTS 151589 GRASEBYANDERSEN $1,065.24 LAB SUPPLIES 151590 GRATING PACIFIC,INC $1,949.20 FIBERGLASS GRATING 151591 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $101.47 PRINTING 151592 DGA CONSULTANTS $4,180.00 SURVEYING SERVICES 3.3611 151593 DAVID M GRIFFITH&ASSOC. $3,209.15 LAB MANAGER RECRUITMENT 151594 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $1,024.78 TRUCK PARTS 161595 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $372.12 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 151595 HELPMATES PERSONNEL SERVICES $693.88 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 151597 HERBS BLACK FOREST BAKERY $389.00 MEETING EXPENSE 151598 HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT $2,083.33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN. 151699 HOLMES&NARVER,INC. $22.384.29 ENGINEERING SERVICES P144 151600 HOME DEPOT $152.34 SMALL HARDWARE 151601 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $317.51 PAINT SUPPLIES 161602 IDEXX $132.63 LAB SUPPLIES 151603 IPCO SAFETY $1,904.92 SAFETY SUPPLIES 151604 IMAGING PLUS $94.09 OFFICE SUPPLIES 151605 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. $600.00 TRUCK PARTS 1516M INORGANIC VENTURES $239.87 LAB SUPPLIES 151607 INTEGRATED URBAN FORESTRY $450.00 FIELD INSPECTION&ANALYSIS 151608 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $1,094.85 BATTERIES 1616M IRVINE PHOTO GRAPHICS $143.26 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 151610 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $4.90 WATER USE 151611 JAMISON ENGINEERING $2.477.14 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 151612 GREATWESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $618.73 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 151613 JAY'S CATERING $903.86 DIRECTORS MEETING EXPENSE 151614 JETFORM CORP. $305.00 PUBLICATIONS 151615 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $311.43 ELECTRIC PARTS 151616 JONES HALL HILL&WHITE $8,707.76 BOND COUNSEL SERVICES M001-24-96 161617 KALLEEN'S COMPUTER PRODUCTS $1,799.97 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 151618 KEENAN SUPPLY $895.61 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 151619 KING BEARING,INC. $1,782.58 MACHINE SUPPLIES 151620 KIRWAN COMPANY $640.80 MISCELLANEOUS HARDWARE 151621 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $2,965.64 TOOLS 151622 LAMOTTE COMPANY $76.93 SULFIDE TEST KIT 151623 LAIDLAW ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES $190.00 WASTE DISPOSAL 161624 LASHER DODGE $13.533.69 PICK-UP TRUCK 151625 LIEBERT CORPORATION $26,883.64 ELECTRIC PARTS 151628 LOCALAGENCY $3,900.00 ANNEXATION FEE 151627 LOCALAGENCY $950.00 ANNEXATION FEE 151628 CITY OF LOS ANGELES $1.60 CONNECTION FEE 151629 LUCCI'S $124.00 MEETING EXPENSE 151630 MPS $84.35 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 151631 MACOMCO $928.20 SERVICE AGREEMENT 151632 MSA $600.08 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 1516M MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY CORP. $457.26 MISCELLANEOUS HARDWARE FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 04R9/96 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05101MO POSTING DATE 05/MI/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 151034 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS,INC. $3.260.95 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 151835 DENISE MARTINEZ $125.36 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 151838 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $71.38 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 151637 MELLON TRUST $20.139.17 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 151638 MICRO MOTION $855.71 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 151639 MICROFLEX MEDICAL CORP $365.00 SAFETY SUPPLIES 161640 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3.182.75 UNIFORM RENTALS 151641 NAGDCA $300.00 ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP 151642 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES $1,062.50 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 151643 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $915.01 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 151644 NEUTRON $1,848.79 ANIONIC POLYMER M.O.8-1094 151545 NICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY $9.557.07 LUBRICANTS/DIESEL FUEL 151646 NORCAL CONTROLS,INC. $306.43 INSTRUMENT PARTS 151647 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $1,060.08 OFFICE SUPPLIES 15160 OMNI WESTERN INC $256.86 TOOLS 151649 ROBERT J OOTEN $762.61 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 151650 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $4,539.06 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 151661 ORANGE COURIER $141.16 COURIER SERVICES 151652 ORANGE VALVE 8 FITTING CO. $748.21 FITTINGS 151653 OXYGEN SERVICE $2,040.93 SPECIALTY GASES 151664 COUNTY OF ORANGE $270.00 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE 151655 PSSI $7,097.85 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION 161066 PACIFIC INVESTMENT MGMT CO $149,644.00 INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT SERVICES 151557 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $395.00 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 151658 PACIFIC PARTS $139.17 INSTRUMENT PARTS 161659 PACIFIC BELL $1.172.44 TELEPHONE SERVICES 151660 PADRE JANITORIAL SUPPLY $293.51 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 151661 PARAGON CABLE $36.78 CABLE SERVICES 151662 PARTS UNLIMITED $988.06 TRUCK PARTS 151863 PASCAL B LUDWIG $108,796.00 CONSTRUCTION P243-1 151664 PEERLESS WIPING MATERIALS $721.93 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 151665 PERMA SEAL $102.91 LUBE OIL 151666 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $746.38 REIMS.PETTY CASH,TRAINING 8 TRAVEL 151667 WILLIAM PIERCE $572.80 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 151668 POLYMETRICS,INC. $1,262.76 LAB SUPPLIES 151669 POWER SYSTEMS $147.88 MECHANICAL PARTS 151670 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $88.00 ICE FOR SAMPLES 151671 PUMP ENGINEERING $1,000.03 PUMP PARTS 151672 PUMPING SOLUTIONS INC $564.40 PUMP PARTS 151673 PUTZMEISTER,INC. $505.66 PUMP PARTS 151674 QUICKSTART TECHNOLOGIES $3,750.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 151675 RD SYSTEMS,INC $245.00 CAMERA REPAIR 151676 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $308.66 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS 151677 R 8 R INSTRUMENTS $365.82 ELECTRIC PARTS 151878 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO. $903,91 LAB SUPPLIES 151679 RED WING SHOES $277.29 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 04/29196 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/01/W POSTING DATE 05/01/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 151680 BOLT DELIVERY $72.00 FREIGHT 151681 RENOLDINC. $741.73 MECHANICAL PARTS 151682 RONAN ENGINEERING CO $142.60 ALARM PANEL RELAY 151663 RYAN-HERCO $30.90 METAL 161684 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $1.535.38 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 151685 SARTORIUS CORP. $85.00 LAB SUPPLIES 151686 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $167.18 SPECIALTY GASES 151687 SEA COAST DESIGNS $297.19 LAB SUPPLIES 151688 SEAL PRO INC $2,718.35 MECHANICAL PARTS 151689 SEARS ROEBUCK S CO $124.27 TOOLS 151690 SENTIENT SYSTEMS,INC. $2,882.56 FACILITATOR SERVICES 151691 SEWER EQUIP CO OF AMERICA $1,201.48 LEADER HOSE 151692 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $302.70 TOOLS 151693 SHURELUCK SALES $4,188.63 TOOLS/HARDWARE 151694 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $962.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 151695 SMITH-EMERY 00. $162.00 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-13.94 151696 SMITH PIPE&SUPPLY $155.12 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 151697 SNAP ON/SUN CORP $964.43 TOOLS 1516M SO CALIF EDISON CO $27,680.91 POWER 151699 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $8,853.99 NATURAL GAS 151700 SPARLING INSTRUMENT CO.,INC. $250.00 METER 151701 SQUARED/CRISP AUTOMATION SYSTEMS $2,834.00 ELECTRICAL REPAIR 151702 STANDARD SUMP a EQUIP CO $37.03 MECHANICAL PARTS 151703 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION $250.00 ANNEXATION FEE 151704 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION $250.00 ANNEXATION FEE 161705 KEITH D STOLZENBACH $1,650.00 CONSULTING SERVICES 151705 SUMMIT STEEL $958.98 METAL 151707 SUNSET FORD $346.01 TRUCK PARTS 151708 SUPELCO,INC. $148.65 LAB SUPPLIES 151709 SUPERCHEMCORP. $2,238.41 CHEMICALS 151710 SUPER POWER PRODUCTS $517.20 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 151711 SUPREX CORP. $2.500.00 RENTAL AGREEMENT 151712 SYMCAS $7,647.60 CONSULTING SERVICES 151713 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG,COMPANY $989.46 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 151714 TENNANT CO $158.03 AUTO PARTS 151715 TEXAS COMMERCE BANK $10,472.47 COP TRUSTEE SERVICES 151718 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $597.00 MECHANICAL PARTS 151717 TONER SYSTEM INTERNATIONAL $1,290.85 PRINTER SUPPLIES 151718 TRAFFIC CONTROL ENGINEERING $1,400.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS 151719 TRENCH SHORING COMPANY $17.509.36 STEEL PLATES 151720 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $81.64 TRUCK PARTS 151721 JG TUCKER S SON,INC. $1,630.70 INSTRUMENT PARTS 161722 U.S.AUTO GLASS CENTERS $200.82 TRUCK PARTS 151723 UNISOURCE&/OR BUTLER PAPER $96.33 OFFICE SUPPLIES 151724 DATAVAULT/US SAFE DEPOSITCO $94.00 BACK-UP TAPE STORAGE 151725 VWR SCIENTIFIC 35,379.53 TAB SUPPLIES FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0429196 PAGE6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 06/01/96 POSTING DATE 051011% WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 151726 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $832.16 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 151727 VALVATE ASSOCIATES $491.77 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 151728 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS $2,050.40 FREIGHT 151729 VERTEX TECHNOLOGIES,INC. $1,743.07 FIBER OPTICS 151730 VERTEX SYSTEMS $2,507.60 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT 151731 VORTEX INDUSTRIES $860.00 BUILDING REPAIRS 151732 WACKENHUT CORP. $5,779.36 CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS 151733 WAL-CON CONSTRUCTION CO. $146,304.79 CONSTRUCTION P243-1 151734 WAXIE $541.00 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 151735 WEF $325.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING 151736 WEST COAST ANALYTICAL SRV $1,950.00 BIOSOLIDS ANALYSIS 151737 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $27,168.61 CAUSTIC SODA NO 6-23-95 151738 WESTIN SANTA CIARA $240.90 MANAGEMENT TRAINING-LODGING 151730 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $262.53 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 151740 WESCO $350.19 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 151741 CITY OF WESTMINSTER $256.25 SURFACE GRADING 151742 ROURKE,WOODRUFF 3 SPRADLIN $87.164.62 LEGAL SERVICES MO 7.26-95 151743 GARY YOUNG(STATEWIDE INSTL) $990.00 INSTALL BIOLOGICAL HOODS IN LAB 151744 ZYMARK CORP. $118.15 LAB EQUIPMENT TOTAL CLAIMS PAID O610V98 $2,150,367.83 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE N129/96 PACE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05MI/96 POSTING DATE 05/01198 SUMMARY AMOUNT #1 OPER FUND $2,526.70 #2 OPER FUND $12,876.52 #2 CAP FAC FUND $12,876.49 #3 OPER FUND $18,488.56 #3 CAP FAC FUND $9H,807.34 05 OPER FUND $5,560.48 #6 OPER FUND $808.29 #6 CAP FAC FUND $380.72 #7 OPER FUND $9.330.91 #7 CAP FAC FUND $450.00 #11 OPER FUND $8.360.02 #11 CAP FAC FUND $173.98 #13 OPER FUND $35.61 #14 OPER FUND $384A3 914 CAP FAC FUND $122.60 #586 CAP FAC FUND $147.226.53 #687 OPER FUND $213.52 #7814 OPER FUND $15.71 .IT OPER FUND $305,327.31 CORP $328.632.67 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $71,860.61 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $279,916.93 $2,150,367.83 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE-VARIOUS PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID-MISCELLANEOUS HANDWRITE WARRANTS WARRANT DATE WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 04/11M 151195 ASCE TUL CONFERENCE $375.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING 04111M 151196 ALBARKER $15,640.13 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 04/11/96 151197 COUNTY CLERK $25.00 NOTICE OF EXEMPTION FEE 04/11/96 151198 ALEX FISHMAN $4,802.31 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 04/11/96 151199 PAULINE JOHNSTON AND $6,160.00 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM "11/96 151200 JOEL MANCHESTER,M.D. $10,068.80 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 04/11/96 151201 HELENE WINOGURA $7,100.93 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 04/15/96 151459 APWA S85.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 04/15/95 151460 COUNTY CLERK $38.00 NOTICE OF EXEMPTION FEE 04/15/86 151461 COUNTY CLERK $38,00 NOTICE OF EXEMPTION FEE 04/15l86 151462 UPPER NEWPORT BAY $20.00 EARTH DAY FEE 04/19/98 151463 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $1.200.00 APPEALFEE "19m 151464 KEYE PRODUCTIVITY CENTER $139.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 04/19M 151465 WATERUSE MEMBERSHIP $100.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING 04/24/96 151486 DONNA ANDERSON $21.95 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 04/24/96 161487 HARRY CROMWELL $19,125.00 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 04/24/96 151488 EMERGENCY SERVICE RESTORATION $2,144.30 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 0424/96 151489 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT S495.00 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 0424/96 151490 NEWPORT HARBOR LOCKSMITH S65.00 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 0424196 151491 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS INC $129,612.96 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 3-29�95 0424196 151492 WATERUSE ASSOCIATION $150.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING 0426/96 151493. JOHN C.COX,JR. $200.45 CASA WORKSHOP 0426/95 151494 SAL SAPIEN $200.45 CASA WORKSHOP 0426/95 151495 PEER SWAN $MDA5 CASA WORKSHOP 05/01/96 151745 NICHOLAS ARHONTES $543.55 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 05/01AB 151746 THE BALBOA BAY CLUB $3,376.65 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 05/01/96 161747 GASKET ENGINEERING $90.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 05/01/96 151748 INNOVATION GROUP WEST $420.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING 05/03/96 151749 THEN BALBOA BAY CLUB $955.40 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 05/03196 151750 EMERCON RESTORATION $5.967.66 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 06/03/96 151751 MARTIN 8 MILDRED LITKE $4.391.42 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 05/03/96 151762 WORLD RESTORATION $2.469.44 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 05/09/96 151778 AMSA $526.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 05/09/96 151779 DONNA ANDERSON $67.50 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 05/09/96 151780 DE GUELLE&SONS GLASS CO $560.00 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 05/09/96 151781 EMERSON RESTORATION $437.25 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 06/09/96 151782 PAULINE JOHNSTON AND $3,619.19 NEWPORT BEACH CLAIM 05109M 151783 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS INC $128,563.20 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 329-96 TOTAL CLAIMS PAID S350,003.99 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE-VARIOUS PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID-MISCELLANEOUS HANDWRITE WARRANTS SUMMARY AMOUNT 92 CAP FAC FUND $423.00 03 OPER FUND $90.00 05 OPER FUND $538.13 JT OPER FUND $261,397.49 CORF $4,333.46 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $93,221.91 $350,003.99 SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 REGULAR MEETING MAY 22, 1996 - 7:30 P.M. RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 4 Minute excerpts have been received as set forth below. Pursuant to Regular Agenda Item No. 4, it is appropriate to receive and file said excerpts: (4) (a) DISTRICTS 1. 7 & 14 Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept resignation of Mayor Worley of the City of Tustin from the Boards of Directors of Districts Nos. 1, 7 and 14, and seating first and second alternates to the mayor, as follows: District Active Director Alternate Director 1, 7 & 14 Thomas R. Saltarelli Jim Potts (d) Consideration of motion to receive and file any minute excerpts received subsequent to preparation of supplemental agenda, if any (8) DISTRICTS 2, 3, 5. 6 & 11 If no corrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will be deemed approved as attached and be so ordered by the Chair: Distict 2 - May 4, 1996 adjourned District 3 - May 4, 1996 adjourned District 5 - May 4, 1996 adjourned District 6 - May 4, 1996 adjourned District 11 - May 4, 1996 adjourned a:MPMCWwGNZn.M s ��, . �„ The News Pipeline County Sanitation Districts of Orange County "Protecting the Public Health and Environment Through Excellence in Wastewater Systems" Volume 3, No. 10 May 22, 1996 Tony Gutierrez Sr. Retires! be in his 90s and eventually died after being y thrown from a horse. Tony's many interests include ocean fishing, T _ There are as many playing saxophone in his own band, and dancing. l interesting stories here at He has always had a love of learning and recently the Districts as there are taught himself how to arc-weld. Another little- people. But few match the known fact about Tony Sr. is that he speaks legacy of part-time English, Spanish and Japanese fluently. (. laboratory assistant Tony Nobody is a stranger to Tony. He always says ". Gutierrez Sr. who just hello to everyone he meets. He is helpful, kind retired after 22 years at and considerate, and can always make people p, the age of 871 As you will laugh. He says, "It makes the job go easier."We see, Tony Sr. was no agree. And we all wish Tony Sr. good luck in his ordinary employee. In fact, second retirement! his two sons, Tony Jr. and Art, both retired from the Districts after long careers before Tony Sr. did! Districts' Employees Receive Tony's tenure at the Districts followed his first Certificates from career as the owner and operator of a market and butcher shop in Compton.When he started at the International Society for Districts in 1974, he was our surfzone sample taker on what the laboratory calls "The Beach Measurement and Control Run." Five days a week, starting at sunrise, Tony drove in from Compton, picked up the jeep, and Congratulations are in order for five traveled the beach from Boise Chica to Corona employees who have recently received Del Mar taking surfzone water samples at our 17 certificates from the International Society for shoreline stations. He did the beach run until Measurement and Control (ISA). These select about four years ago when he began doing individuals met the requirements of ISA's rigid general lab support, including getting boat standards for experience, education and training, samples, gassing-up and washing vehicles, and were awarded registered certification for cleaning acid bottles and general maintenance. these qualities and abilities. When he would go out on quarterly trawls, he The recipients of ISA's two highest ratings, was always the first person on the boat and the "Level 2 or 3" for technical certification, were last to leave at the end of the day. He was still Dale Brooks, James Clark, James Hauter and energetic and cheerful when everyone else was Ken Olberg from Division 3370, Instrumentation. exhausted. One of the things people comment on Shamshad Hyder of Division 2430, Plant most about Tony Sr. is that he has endless Automation, was also awarded a "Level 3". energy and strength. He says that he has always ISA is recognized internationally as the believed in hard work, and never felt good unless leading authority on standards assessment and he was working. "It keeps you young," he says. establishment for control engineering, design Tony Sr. would often tell stories about riding and practice. ISA is utilized and well respected in around Lake Tahoe on horseback as a child the wastewater and petrochemical industries, before there were roads there and remembers and all other industries that use process control taking the stagecoach from Compton to Dana and monitoring. Point with his grandfather. His grandfather lived to 1 Tom Dawes Jr. Earns M.D. Jeff is finishing his Masters degree in Marine Biology at California State University, Long from Howard University Beach. Call Jeff, ext. 3567, if you'd like more information about his presentation. Thomas M. Dawes Jr., son of Engineering Planning Manager Tom Dawes, received his Doctor of Medicine degree from Howard Pre-Retirement University in Washington D.C. on May 10. Dr. Seminar Schedule Dawes, who graduated with honors and was eighth in his class, will now begin a residency in Are you thinking of retiring in the next year or family practice in Scottsdale, Ariz. so? To help prepare for retirement and get your Congratulations Dr. Dawes! important questions answered, you're invited to attend an Orange County Employees Retirement Kimberl Christensen System (OCERS) pre-retirement seminar. Day- Kimberly long seminars are held from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Promoted to Supervisor Evening seminars are split over three successive weeks from 6:00 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. Congratulations to Kimberly Christensen Seminars are scheduled for the following who has just been promoted to Supervisor of the dates: Organic Analysis Section of the Environmental • June 12 (daytime) Sciences Laboratory. Kim comes to this position • July 12 (daytime) with more than 15 years of experience in • Aug. 6, 13, 20 (evening) laboratory analysis of wastewater. When she • Sept. 10, 17, 24 (evening) first came to the Districts (and when we were • Oct. 1, 8, 15 (evening) smaller and everyone in the laboratory was • Nov. 15 (daytime) cross-trained to wear multiple professional hats), Topics to be covered include financial Kim worked in the areas of microbiology, marine planning,estate planning, social security benefits, monitoring and wet chemical analysis. For the deferred compensation, the retiree health care past nine years, Kim has distinguished herself as program and your OCERS retirement benefits. Principal Lab & Research Analyst in the Call Mary Abbott in the OCERS Retirement Organics Analysis Section. She has assisted Office at 975-1962 if you have any questions Laboratory Manager Sam Mowbray in the about the seminars. administration of this section for the past several months. Please Don't Feed the Animals In her new position, Kim will supervise the functions involved in the organic analysis of Our two plant sites are home to several wastewater, source control, air, and marine species of wild animals including ground biology samples. squirrels, rats, opossums, skunks, rabbits and feral cats. While the animals that live on our plant grounds Jeff Armstrong Speaks to don't feed themmay be cute and furry, please Southern California There was a recent incident near the Academy of Sciences warehouse at Plant No. 2 where a ground z squirrel had chewed through a wiring harness of Jeff Armstrong, an intern working for the a car disabling it. Feeding the animals only Environmental Compliance and Monitoring encourages them to hang around—and who Division, gave a talk and presented a poster at knows how much more damage they can cause? the Southern California Academy of Sciences annual meeting at Loyola Marymount University Third Quarter Facts And Statistics on May 3 and 4. Using data from the Districts' Ocean Monitoring Program, Jeffs presentation The Districts' FY 95-96 Third Quarter was titled, "Analysis of 20 Years of Fish Trawl Pertinent Facts and Key Statistics summary Data off Orange County, California, 1975-1994." sheets are available from Pat McNally, ext. 2056. 2 Become a Pi aline Reporter! 'I • In reserved parking places for Rideshare participants. Are you a frustrated writer?Would you`"`"`'" • In reserved parking places for employees.The you like to y see your work in print? Do you need an outlet for appropriate "S" or "T" or "R" parking permit your creativity? Well, we have just the answer! must be displayed when parking in an "S" or Join the Reporter's Network and become a "T" or"R" designated lot or space. News Pipeline staff reporter. This group of select • reserved parking spaces for Districts' v individuals will be the eyes and ears of The News vehicles. PARKING PERMITS Pipeline in the field, and help bring more diversity to our coverage of employee and Districts' activities. Parking permits are issued t all employees. c The permit has a letter on it that corresponds to a Just call the editor of The News Pipeline, Pat designated parking lot nearest your work location. McNally, ext. 2056, and sign up today! Please park only in parking lots that correspond to the letter on your permit. Notify Human Traffic and Parking Resources, ext. 2111. if you need to replace a lost or broken permit. Regulations U date SPEED LIMIT As a friend) reminder, ark in the lot The maximum speed limit allowed within y pleas P Districts' property is 15 miles per hour. you were assigned. That would sure help the overcrowding situation in our parking lots. Here are some other facts you might find of Father's Day Raffle interest: CURB MARKINGS The Employee Activity Committee (EAC) is • RED indicates no stopping, standing or sponsoring a Father's Day Raffle on June 13 to parking. help raise money for this year's Employee • YELLOW indicates it is safe to stop for a Picnic. Tickets are $.50 each or three for a dollar maximum of 30 minutes to load or unload and can be purchased from your EAC freight or passengers. representative. • WHITE indicates it is safe to load or unload First prize is $50 worth of steaks, second passengers only for the posted time limit. prize is a $40 gift certificate from Home Depot, • BLUE indicates that parking is restricted to and third prize is a new set of barbecue tools. vehicles of disabled persons displaying the appropriate license plate or placard. Join the American Cancer PROHIBITED PARKING Society's Annual "Bela for Life" Parking is prohibited in the following areas: Y Y • On a crosswalk or sidewalk. 1 — • On a roadway if the vehicle obstructs the flow RELAYS The Employee Activity of traffic. . 0 Committee is sponsoring a team • In front of a fire hydrant or fire department rA for the American Cancer Society s Annual 'Relay For connection. • Double parking is always prohibited. �; C Life," at the Goldenwest College • In a "No Parking" zone or blocking a building Ili track in Westminster on Friday, III June 21, through Saturday, June • Other than within a marked parking space. " •K 22. This is an 18-hour camping RESTRICTED PARKING vigil to help raise money in the Parking is restricted in the following areas: fight against cancer. We will be using the name • In loading or unloading zones in excess of 30 "Royal Flush"just like we did in the MS Walk. minutes of the posted time. Teams will consist of 10 to 15 people, who • In reserved parking spaces for visitors. will each attempt to raise $100 in donations for Authorized parking passes must be displayed this event. Each team member will participate in on the vehicle's dashboard, the relay by walking, running, jogging, dancing • In reserved parking places for disabled (or other creative means) around the track for 30 persons. minutes at a time. 3 The team registration fee is $10 per person. Engineering Hosts Staff Registration begins at 7 p.m. on Friday and the g g event ends at 12 noon on Saturday. Participants Seminar on Strafe IC Plan f' can camp out in tents on the field, and refreshments and all-night entertainment will be Nearly 70 staff members attended a luncheon provided. seminar on Phase I of the Strategic Plan on May An 11-minute promotional video about this 14. The program was hosted by the Engineering event will be shown in the Board Room on May Department and included presentations by 29 at 2 p.m. Contact Patricia Magnante, ext. project consultants Carollo Engineers, and 3701, If you have any questions. Camp, Dresser and McKee. Phase I consists of three projects: an Employees Participate in investigation and repair of the Districts' ocean Environmental Career Da outfalls, a study of our wastewater collection system and ways to better manage peak flows, More than 20 engineers, scientists and and a financial study that will determine an environmental specialists from all over Orange equitable program of sewer connection fees and County shared their professional expertise and annual user charges for both residential and experience for the first Environmental Career Day commercial/industrial customers. at McGarvin Middle School in Westminster on May 3. lmotions* Districts'employees who participated included Bob Ooten, Pat McNelly, Chloe Dam, Mike The following employees were promoted during Mengel, Tom Gerlinger, Jeff Armstrong, Sonja the last pay period. Congratulations! Klick, Mark Tomko, Marco Polo Velasco and Kimberly Christensen - Laboratory Mike McCarthy. From: Principal Laboratory & As a result of the program, the 7th and 8th Research Analyst graders, most of whom are Vietnamese, have a To: Laboratory Supervisor better understanding of the many job Chuck Hodge -Source Control opportunities in the environmental field. Chloe From: Associate Engineer III Dec was particularly helpful because she was To: Engineer able to bridge the language gap by giving part of her talk in Vietnamese. And special thanks to Craig Boyd, a Water p Service Awards 0 Quality Inspector for Allwest Geoscience in Anaheim, who coordinated the event. Boyd The following employees celebrated their contacted school officials last year with his service anniversaries during the last pay period. proposal to recruit professional colleagues for a Congratulations! student conference on environmental Five Years employment opportunities. Maria Becerra Plant Maintenance Alicia Fernandez Plant Maintenance LE:MA Video Presentations cheduled Next Week The Communications Division will be showing a video tape of the EMA presentation on The News Pipeline competitiveness for all employees who were unable to attend. The News Pipeline is published every payday by the Video presentations will be held in the Board Communications Division for the employees, retirees and P Directors of the Orange County Sanitation Districts.The deadline Room on Wed., May 29 - 9 a.m. to 11:30 a.m.; for submitting news Items is the Wednesday before payday, Wed., May 29 - 5 p.m. to 7:30 p.m.; and Thurs., Contnbutions are welcome! May 30 - 1:30 p.m. to 4 p.m. Please contact Editor.................................................Patrick McNally(x206G) Fawn Elizondo, ext. 0, and let her know which showing you will be attending. 4 mEEnNo DATE: May 22, 1996 TM1E: 7:30 p.m. DR:TRIDTs: 1. 2. 3. 5. 6. 7. 11. 13 & 14 DISTRICT 1 JOINT BOARDS IMORENO) ....... MC GUINAN ........ MERRY) ............. BOWMAN ......... he (PERRYMCHAFERI ..... FERRYMAN ........ IHASTWOSI........... MOM ........... ✓ —_ ICOONRI .......... . MURPHY .......... (SCOTT) ............. COLLINS — 0,07761 . ...... ... . . SALTAREW ........ i7 IDEBAY) ............. COX . .......... (STEINERI ...... .. . . . STANTON ......... JG (COX) ............... DEBAV .......... (BELL) .............. GENES ......... 7 IBAUERI ......I...... DETTLOFF ......... DISTRICT 2 MARKER) . .... . ...... DUNLAP .......... MISCOTTI .......... .. COLLINS ........ IDOWNEYI..... ....... ECKENRODE ....... ILUXBONI .. .. ..... T2RT ........... DERRYMCHAFFRI ...... FERRYMAN ........ (BELL) ........ . DENES ............ (ANDERSON) .......... FLOM ......... (PARKERI .. ...... .. . ECKENRDUNLAP........... (WELCIMARSH) .......... GRIFFIN ........... _ (DOWNEY)........ .. . FLOM ... ........ (WARD) ............. IS HAMMONN ........ IANOERSONI .... .... . FLOM ............ f`L IBAER ............. HAMIG .. ........ (MORENDI ........ . . . MCOUIOAN ........ JI IBAUERI . ............ LINN . .... ....... (COONTLI ......... . . MURPHY .......... R.i IMINERIORKW ............. MC IGAN........ IBANKHEADI ......... NORBY............ f (MORENOI ............ MC PHY .......... STEINEI........... . SINNER ...... roOONT21 ............ MURPHY .......... GL/ ISTEINERI .......... . STANTON ......... y7' (EVANGlANGHFAOI .......... RONERICE . ........... IDALVI ............ . 2EMEL ............ L (EVANSI ............. SAL ............. — IPoTTSI ............. eALTARELLI........ DISTRICT 3 (DOTSON) ...... ...... SAPIEN ........... IDOTSON) ........... GAREN .......... . . 12LAKEn. ............ SINGER ........... (PARKERI ........... WNLAP........... STEINERI ............. STANTON .............. 9E IKERRVI ............ BOWMAN.......... ISTANTON) ...... 9NIER .......... IMETING31.......... GROWN ........... IMILLEIO ......... .. .. SWAN............ —, METING ............ COLLINS ......... IWAHLSMOMI ........ SYLVIA ........... (ANDERSON) ......... FLOM ............ IGULUXS0N1 .......... 1WiL6N ........... (MARSHALL) ......... GRIFFIN ........... IDALYI .............. 2EMEL ........... — ISAUERI ............ IEInIO ........... . — IMINERI ............ LWN ............. (MOREN01 ........... MCGUIGAN ...... ND ID I IUI ........ NORBY.......... ANDERSON WOODRUFF (EVANSI ............ RICE ............. .. ✓ BUY S ... L ANDRUS . ... STEINE )ETI ........... SINNER .. ...... HODNES ... . LE .. ISTEINERI ........... SYLVIA N ......... NOVEY .... BC LEE.. ...... IWAHLS111O.. ....... SYLVIA ........... "LIEJONK ..... J/ LWONIXON...... KYLE .... SHAW...... _ IDALYI ............. 2EMEL ............ L/ L LINGER .... SHAW...... DISTRICT 6 LUDWIN ... e ST NE ..... _ ICOXI .............. DEBAY............ �(. MCINTYRE.. � x"wPlif- ISTANTONI .......... BtaMBR'........... L7 MCNELLY .. .......... � (DEBAYI ............ COX ............. 71 OOTEN .... -i�- .........._ PETERMAN .......... DISTRICT 6 STREED ... 61 .......... (COX) .SCRAPER) ..... FEMYIMN......... T L"S 7LE .. �, ........ :STANT N) ... ....... DEEM ............ WIIEATIFY .......... �_ ISTANTONI .......... 8£iNlN........... WILSON .. .......... DISTRICT] IWARD) ............ HAMMOND......... �R.tX� � IPoTT61 ............ SALTARELLI ........ (COXI .............. DEMY............ (R2MYAiC11ARD1I ..... FERRYMAN......... (MORENOI..... .. .... MUMMY N ........ _ ISTANTO ........ I . . MURPHY . ISTANTONI ....... . . . 99LW1ET:.......... IBAUER) .......... .. E T F ......... ✓ M !b'NN✓�1 IVERI D L .......... O ......... 'STANTON (�I ' ISTEINER) ........... STANTONN ....... DISTRICT tf WELCH) ............ GUWXBON .(DALYI 2EMEL........... . I I ........... DUNLAP.......... . $/ ICOON2 ..........: MURPHY .......... IBTANTONI ......... .BiH1aF.'......... . DISTRICT 16 IPoTTSI .......... SALTARELLI ........ _ ICOONTDI ........... MURRIY .......... (WARD) ............ HAMMOND...... ... _ ISTANTON) .......... INFIRM........... � J:1WP000MOIRECTORM102. (MILLER) ............ SWAN . O:V27/96 PUBLIC SIGN-IN SHEET COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY May 22, 1996 BOARD MEETING NAME ORGANIZATION/FIRM Please Print Please Print So �/ CS [ ' , / REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS LL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS ON SVCIF AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND UBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT BOARD MEETING. A DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS E DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION D REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES. DATE: AGENDA ITEM N0. lS NAME: (PLEASE PRINT) HOME ADDRESS: ;7_?l � �/� k'4d'(� y�1/�' J _-�2/7 / NUMBER STREET ' G ITY ZIP u6DE TELEPHONE: �o Q,p�,c/ �7`/a` c3� / //�,, REPRESENTING: ��/ �`�g ' SELF OR NAME OF O ANIZ TION / , F28A • REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THEI]$OA�ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD PLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMME CE ENT OF TH BOARD MEETING. A DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS Y BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION AND REMARKS 4W BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES. > DATE: AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (PLEASE PRINT) HOME ADDRESS: /v, IG S S A/' /(/NUMBER TREET iY VA Cl-A ? 2 ?off G CITY ZIP CODE TELEPHONE: �p ,3 �/35 S REPRESENTING: div6 £ l OJ/-'��' G�/�/��C�}®z SELF OR NAME OF ORGANIZATION F28A REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION AND REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES. DATE: 2- AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (PLEASE PRINT) HOME ADDRESS: 2 1L10S / ,� Q S7 NUMBER STREET Las If_-G-'G� S CITY ZIP CODE TELEPHONE: 21.3 - ,J rJS-/S Co REPRESENTING: LOGh� L SO/ - / t-N-IF SELF OR NAME OF RGANIZATION F28A 05/22/96 -JOINT BOARD MINUTES #3 Receive and File Minutes JC: We have an item in your agenda regarding the City of Tustin. We need a motion to recognize Tom Saltarelli as the Active Director and Jim Potts as the Alternate Director in Districts 1, 7 and 14. Any opposition? Okay, we'll consider that unanimous. #4 -Annual Election of Chair and Chair Pro Tern JC: This is the annual election of the Chair and Chair pro tern for each of the Boards. We'll go through one by one and get your nominations. District 1 - Pat you're back. District 2 - John, you' back. Dan, although you're not with us tonight, you're back. District 3 - Okay, Sal, you're Chair. How about chair pro tern -okay you've got two - all in favor of Sheldon, raise your hands. Those in favor of Burnie Dunlap. 7 - Sheldon Singer/ 5 - Burnie Dunlap. Okay Sheldon, you're it. District 5 -Jan you're it. District 6 - Jim Ferryman -you're it. . District 7 - Barry you're it. District 11 -Victor- Okay - okay Shirley. District 13 -We don't have a quorum in District 13. District 14-Tom -okay - pro tem - Mark Murphy. That takes care of it with the exception of District 13. We'll pick that up later if we get a quorum. #7(a) - Report of Joint Chair JC: I would like to report that the Executive Committee met last Wednesday to revisit the Consolidation issue of the Districts and the Pringle bill. The Committee agreed to present this issue to the Directors at the June Board Meeting, so it will be coming up and the minutes will be included in your next months' agenda packet. The Executive Committee, which I'll mention again later is going to meet again in June and review the final proposal to the Board because some additional questions have come up since our last meeting. The OMTS Committee Chair, Pat McGuigan, has asked that the July 3rd meeting be changed to July 11 th, immediately following the PDC Committee. I'm also saddened to report another death that we had associated with the Districts. One of our Senior Operations Supervisors, Rory Nelson, died yesterday in a scuba diving accident in Mexico. Rory had been with the Districts for 18 years and he'll be missed by all of those who knew him. Tonight, we'll be adjourning the meeting in his memory. On a brighter note, I'm pleased to announce that on May 20th, the Districts received an AMSA 1996 Research and Technology Award for our pilot digester project headed by Associate Engineer, Michelle Fitzgerald and retired Scientist, Gregg Pamson. This project evaluated the anaerobic digestion under controlled conditions and tested alternative operating methodologies to increase methane gas production, control hydrogen sulfide gas production and increase volatile solids reduction. Michelle JAWPD0Ct6S\MIN96W0TES.05 Page 1 accepted the award for the Districts at the Spring Conference in Washington, DC. AMSA presents this award annually to a member agency that produces a technological innovation related to wastewater treatment or biosolids utilization and disposal. Again, congratulations to both Michelle and Gregg. Upcoming meetings: The Ad Hoc Committee regarding Space Utilization will be meeting on May 29th at 5:30 pm; the OMTS Committee will meet on Wednesday, June 5th at 5:30 pm. It will begin with a tour of the two on-going research projects and the dinner and business meeting are scheduled to start about 6:15 pm. The PDC Committee will met Thursday, June 6th at 5:30 pm; and a tentative meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee regarding Landfill Consultants Billings has been scheduled for June 11 th at 5:3Opm. It's anticipated that this will be a telephone conference call held in the General Managers Conference Room and staff will provide additional information. This is something that came out of discussion at the Finance Committee. The FAHR will meet on Wednesday, June 12th at 5:30 pm; and the Executive Committee will meet Wednesday, June 19th at 5:30 pm. The Steering Committee meets again the 26th at 5:30 pm and the next Joint Board Meeting meets following on June 26th at 7:30 pm. #7(b) - Report of General Manager DFM: I have three quick items. The first of them is an update on the EPA permit which has been a bit elusive in the last five years. Blake is taking a few days vacation. He and Nancy and some other staff members went to San Francisco to EPA last week and I've asked Nancy to make a brief report on the outcome of that meeting which I think you'll find to be very positive. Nancy Wheatley: It was in fact a very good meeting. Blake, Mike Moore and I went up to San Francisco to meet with Alexis Strauss (who is the head of Water for Region 9), her staff, as well as some members of the staff of the Regional Water Quality Control Board. Our permit is issued jointly by those two agencies. We had provided EPA and the Regional Board with an update to our permit application, which if you'll recall was submitted in 1989 and the major change that has occurred since that 1989 renewal application was that our estimate of flows has gone down and we have done more work in terms of recognizing the affect of water reclamation and water reuse on the amount of discharge from our ouffall. What the reduction in flow means and the reduction in discharges means is that we are discharging less on an annual basis and so we were able to suggest lower permit limits could be applied to us. Limits within which we could comfortable operate. As a consequence of that update, the EPA appears to believe that they can in fact grant a continuing waiver based upon the regulations that are in place. They have again turned their attention to our permit/renewal application and they are working on what is called a tentative decision document or a TDD and a draft permit. We discussed a possible schedule with them in which they would release this draft TDD and the draft permit sometime early in August. There is a Regional Water Quality Control Board Meeting on August 23rd and it is possible that there will be workshop on the permit and the decision document at that meeting. Then, there would be another Board meeting in September (Regional Water Quality Control Board Meeting) at which it is anticipated that the permit would come up for renewal and the J.'UPDOMBSUN98WOTES.05 Page 2 Regional Board does not approve the waiver only EPA does.Its possible that the final action would be taken at either the September or October Regional Water Quality Control Board Meeting. Between now and then, we are planning to do more work with the public, particularly after the documents are released. However, the first thing we're going to do is present some information at the June 13th meeting with the special stakeholders for the strategic plan and at the back of the package that Michelle handed you you'll find a couple of pages that have this tentative schedule and the guiding principles for the permit which we developed with EPA and the Regional Board. We would then probably meet with the stakeholders sometime between June 13 and the release of the draft documents. We would have the workshop in August and then probably have another workshop in September prior to that final board meeting. Again, we did not identify any significant issues with the EPA. We will be working with them to develop a new monitoring program which we anticipate will have considerably more Flexibility. As I said, we're anticipating that the permit limits will be both reasonable and meetable given the technologies that we now use. DFM: Does any board member have any question of Nancy? This will obviously be a matter that will be on-going and will be discussed at our Strategic Plan workshops and as Nancy said, at the special stakeholder meetings that we're going to be having. If you haven't received yet, you will be receiving from Michelle a packet of material about the workshop. Nancy Wheatley: I also have a copy of the letter that we sent to EPA if there are any Directors that would like a copy. DFM: I found out today, that we have had a complaint about dust that is partly associated with a project where Newport Beach is building a water line over to Fountain Valley and we've allowed them to do some staging in Plant 2. We did have a dust complaint and we've rerouted those trucks and we think we've taken care of it. If you receive any complaints, let us know and we'll take care of it. The last thing I wanted to bring to your attention -you have received a copy of a memo from Mike Peterman to me regarding the health benefits and vision plan that will be discussed later this evening which I would like you to have a chance to glance at before the item comes up to discuss. #7(c) - Report of General Counsel TLW: For information only purposes, there's a memo that was put into your packet tonight on the federal legislative report and the real guts of that pertains to the very last paragraph on the pending congressional action on amendments to super fund. As I've noted in there, there was a real ugly U.S. Court of Appeals decision handed down a couple of months ago which has got most every publicly owned treatment works scared to death because of the potential liability and while it's a little bit different then the Montrose situation the analogy is too close for comfort. In fact, while it's not in this particular district of the federal court system, it could nevertheless be used as a J:\WPDOC\BS\MIN96WOTES.05 Page 3 somewhat guideline or principle. .✓ There is a movement afoot and it seems to be gaining pretty good strength provided that there's even a super fund bill get out of congress this year and that seems pretty slim. But we're working seriously and we've been given a lot of favorable indicators that the idea of protecting municipalities from further liability will be included. Just as a side bar to that, I give you further update. A lot of your cities have been watching very carefully the question of superfund immunity relative to solid waste disposal and landfill sites and much to my surprise, I was able to learn in the last couple of days that there has become a real groundswell of support in Congress to in fact, enact, some fairly comprehensive immunity provisions and hold harmless provisions for municipalities on solid waste disposal. That's assuming there not the active manager of the landfill but for the average city that's just awarding the licenses for the trash. That effort is a culmination of several years of by the National League of Cities, and all sorts of organizations and we have constantly been running into just a solid wall. Neither party has been willing to support any portion of that. But apparently, there has been a major flip and the leadership in both parties and at both houses is endorsing it. You'll be seeing much of that in your League of Cities Bulletins and I'll continue to keep you advised as well. On AB2109 the chairman just announced that they're watching it. We're keeping a very close look at that, that's the bill that's going to create the Orange County Water and Sanitation District. It's next to go to the Assembly Appropriations Committee. Right now the date is unknown but it could happen on very short notice. Lastly, I just learned today, that the trial judge has set a settlement conference on the Montrose case, and that case was settled by a consent decree in which we and all the other 200 municipalities got out a couple of years ago and that consent decree went to the trial judge and he said it sounds like a good ideal to me (he never read it but he signed it) and it went up on appeal and the court of appeals reversed him with a very severe that he wasn't doing his job. So he took at that, dismissed the whole lawsuit, and you'd have to know this trial judge, he's a legend and many books have been and will be written about him and despite his creeping age of 85 years or something like that he continues to try to work, but there is a status conference in a couple of weeks because the municipalities have put together the new settlement agreement which doesn't call for contribution of any money but does gel the case closed out. I'll keep you posted on that. #8 -Approval of Minutes JC: If there is no objection - I'll deem them approved. Also, on the Supplemental Agenda, Districts 2, 3, 5, 6 and 11 we also have minutes there to deem approved. Any objections? Approved. #9 - Payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts JAWPDOMBSUN96WOTES.05 Page 4 Roll Call Vote - motion carries. #10 -Consent Calendar JC: This involves District#7. Motion -and discussion, opposition? Consider that unanimous. #12 -Approval of Steerma Committee Minutes JC: Regarding verbal report on the meeting of April 24. Since this a month old and we've all discussed most of these items, I think I'll dispense with that but you do have the meeting minutes. Just to highlight the points, we did discuss the agenda packages, the Pringle Bill, landfill issues, the 1996/97 budget and the plan of adjustment. What's more important is what we did tonight, just to give you a sense of what's going on we discussed again the Pringle Bill, because it's still in process, several Directors have suggested that we need to marshall more support to change the Pringle Bill because in it's present form it is not appealing to most of us. As you may recall, we have written a letter to Pringle saying that we would like it modified because certainly the spirit of consolidation and reducing the number of special districts is valid but the way it's presently constructed it doesn't really work out to be a practical bill. What I was planning on doing was putting a letter out over my signature as Chair to the City's outlining our position on this and encouraging the City's to also participate in some type of lobbying effort to get this bill modified. I think we're looking for a constructive solution. As you're aware, this District has been working towards a consolidation process for sometime. We also were aware, based on the presentation made to us recently about consolidation activities going on in South County and I think it's valuable for Mr. Pringle to understand that there are efforts taking place here and there is certainly cities and agencies that are trying to address this problem and not just shine it on. We need to have more interest taken in this subject because if it isn't, we're liable to have a Sacramento Bill designed for us without our participation and I don't think we all like that kind of governance. Comment could not be heard. JC: They're looking for a recommendation. There has been a lot of discussion about it, but a meaningful recommendation hasn't been put forth yet. That's why we need to sort of gather the wagons and figure out what our meaningful recommendation is going to be. Comment could not be heard. JC: No, the two recommendations that exist are our own efforts as I mentioned, we're trying to put through and the one that's taking place in the South County. But, I believe we have to put forth a more concerted effort to discuss this item. Comment could not be heard. JAWPDOMBSUNMNOTES.05 Page 5 JC: Let me come back to-That. Let me just finish this report on the Steering Committee. We did talk about the Orange County COG tonight. Just to bring that up as you know, that's in process. To give this board a heads up, it looks like that right now there are 16 cities that approved it so far, and I think they require 19 by population so it looks like it's going to happen within the next week to ten days. If the JPA is formed, then the formal agreement will come to this board to formalize our joining. As you know, we're listed as a participant and ever since has been in place, we have been a participant in some of these county discussions in the past, so presumably, we would want to continue our participation in this process. We did talk about the workshops, we've had some comments about the previous workshops as how they might be done better. We sent out a survey which was very, very helpful and we got valuable feedback and staff is evaluating ways of modifying in response to those comments in the future workshops and we also suggested that the Steering Committee be used as a sounding board so they can bounce some of these ideas off of us before you all get them. We also talked about the Committee Meeting in June, which I've already addressed. If there are no other comments or questions, I need a motion to approve the minutes of the Steering Committee. Opposition? Consider that unanimous. REVISITED -#4 -Annual Election of Chair and Chair Pro Tern JC: Now we'll move back to Item#4 with District 13 for nominations for Chair? District 13 - John, you are reappointed as Chair- Okay, Bob is chair pro tem #13(a)-fd) Report by Pat McGuigan, Chair of OMTS Committee #14(a)-(c) Report by John Collins, Chair of PDC Committee z #15(a)-(h) Report by George Brown. Chair of FAHR Committee JC: George will you give this report. Roger I know you were the one that was Chair of this if you want to supplement it and staff can help supplement it too. What I did want to announce here is that we did have a request to discuss item#15(e), so George, if you don't mind, let's pull item#15(e) and hold that until later and just go through the rest of them. #15(g) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue Chance Order: Question/Comment could not be heard. DFM: Making an acoessment of the 21 closed sites became a bigger job than we had anticipated. The good news is that they didn't find a lot of adverse problems at those sites, but to do a complete job for our due diligence we felt that we had to test them all and that's the consequence. JAWPI)OMBSUN96W OTES.05 Page 6 Question/Comment coed not be heard. JC: Yes, we had some progressive discussion on these. We did increase the budgets on these as we went along starting from last July through now. Some of that, in this case was really uncertain what we were going to uncover. We thought that for the work that was done here, this is a fair price for this and we were aware of the progress. DFM: The Clements Report was given to Jan Miltermeier last week, with the letter asking for our$100,000 back thinking that maybe that might sweeten the deal a little bit. No, not yet. JC: Any other questions, on this item? #15(c) Approving revisions to MPRP Performance Incentive Values: Question/Comment could not be heard. DFM: We have spent (and I don't know the exact amount) about $70,000 of staff time in training to help people understand how to do objective, proper evaluations and so we believe that while this will take a number of years to really get the right process we think we're moving in the right direction and we need to start with serious training and we've done that, in fact, that training will be completed this week. This not going to be subjective and I hope not irrational and there will be a central clearing process to ensure that one department or division isn't more generous and less objective than others. So we think we've got controls built into the system. JAW: The evaluations take a careful look at how the employee met their goals and objectives which were in the workplan. That's agreed to before the beginning of the fiscal year. The employee sits down with their manager or supervisor and goes through those objectives that need to be accomplished and you have mutual understanding of the measurable standard to which the employee will be evaluated. Question/Comment could not be heard. DFM: We'll be happy to have you join us for 8 hours of training if you want to do that. Ultimately, any management system is a matter of trust. At sometime you have to delegate and hold accountable and I don't think there is those kinds of technical built in review systems in a lot of things that we do. I think they are essentially impossible. If anyone would like to review our training materials, or be involved in the training we would be delighted to share that with you, just to know how much time and effort we are putting into this. We are taking this very seriously. It was a system that I inherited when I came here, and we're trying to make it work. I think we're moving in that JAWPDOCMAIN96WOTES.05 Page 7 direction. We can give,761,1 any kind of reporting that you wissas a consequence of those efforts and would be happy to put on a demonstration at one of your meetings about how the training is done. The background of the past evaluations, who gets them and who doesn't and how the bar is placed for performance -that sort of thing. JC: Okay George, I think (h) is self-explanatory, so it looks like your ready to make a motion on (a)(c)(d)(f)(g)(h). Yes, you can call an abstention on any if you'd like. Any opposition on (a)? Any opposition on (c)? John Gullixson and Barry Any opposition on (d)? Any opposition on (f)? Any opposition on (g)? John Gullixson / Bob/ Norby Any opposition on (h)? #15(e) Consideration implementing MetraHealth: JC: This had to do with a change in the medical plan. On the agenda we call for a resolution adoption, General Counsel has changed that because of the circumstances we've gone through and it's really a motion authorizing the General Manager for a MOU which you should have in front of you in your paperwork. To give you more background, I'll have Don go over this. DFM: This is an issue that at the outset looked to be a very favorable or very much of a win/win situation for the Districts and for Districts employees because it was about a $800,000 a year savings in health coverage and providing what I think most of us would agree was a better quality of health coverage than we had experienced the last year. The staff, in it's haste to put this item before the Committees, really did so without touching base with the Board, and included in the package a $100,000 a year vision coverage, which is a new kind of coverage or a much improved coverage for the Districts. The Unions, because the specific name of the carrier or in the three MOU's, with the three unions, we had to get their agreement to bring this forward and they all three agreed. At the meeting of the FAHR Committee, the Board members felt that with Union negotiations coming up in the fall, moving ahead with a new major benefit such as the vision care, was inappropriate and that would be something that would be more properly negotiated at the time of our renewal of union contracts, they disapproved that. The three union representatives, who are here tonight, want to speak to you about that decision, and for that reason, as the Chair said, the item on the agenda has been changed and so the fact is that we can't move this benefit forward without the unions approval because of the way most contracts are written, which put us in an awkward situation. It would be unfortunate for our employees, perhaps half of whom are represented by the union. If we couldn't get the improved benefit at substantial reduced costs to your constituents as well as to our employees. Having said that J:NPDOMBSUN96WOTES.05 Page 8 though, 1 want to sugge*'now that the three persons that wanntto speak come forward and make their comments to you and we can then have discussion following that. Question/Comment could not be heard. Mark Reid: I am here this evening representing the Association of Supervisory/ Professional Management Employees. What I have to say primarily deals with the area of process because that's essentially what all of us are here this evening for and frankly, how we conduct our business in the political arena. The process essentially is that we have a contract, which the General Manager has spoken of this evening, with all of the various groups, outlining the salaries, fringe benefits which they receive during that contract period. You just adopted a motion, and I had asked to speak on Item#15 in general and I apologize. For example, I think that there might have been a typographical error in Item#15(c)(1), I believe the recommendation was 3% rather than 2%, but I'm here primarily to get into this area of process because I think this is a typical example of probably what has happened. The process of negotiation of the union contract is required by law and we have that process that took place relative to the medical insurance program. Each of our contracts specifies that we would review the medical plan at this time of the year and see whether or not we could come up with a better plan as well as maybe something less expensive for everyone. Let me say the employees are not terribly happy with the insurance program that we currently have either. It is to the employees benefit, to look for a different carrier and different benefits and so on. In doing that, management did a great job frankly, of coming up with some ideal carriers at substantially less expensive rates than what the Districts had been paying for, to a tune of nearly $1 million dollars in savings to the Districts. That is rather substantial. I've been here doing this kind of thing almost 28 years, and I don't think I've seen one yet where we've come up with a savings quite as great as this. So nearly a million dollars is substantial. The employees then said, if we're going to save a million dollars for you and obviously something for us, then we ought to look at what is there for the mutual benefit of everybody. The Districts and the management presented that they would put into the package this optical coverage because it was something everybody needed and wanted and so it was there. The employees of course, wanted the Districts to pick up the entire cost of the medical insurance program, saving a million dollars would still render a savings to the Districts of a half a million dollars or more and there would be no cost to the employees. While we discussed that, we argued with it and we negotiated and finally everyone said, we'll buy into this and there is a savings for everybody but lets go ahead with it the way that it was proposed. So, there was an agreement. I believe the agreement exists on the part of 501, OCEA as well and all of the employee organizations members voted to decide whether that was appropriate. That agreement then went on to your FAHR Committee, and that Committee decided that it wasn't appropriate for whatever reason, to make that exchange and change of J:%WPDOCtBS\MlN96WOTES.05 Page 9 benefit programs at this*me. What would happen if the employees said it's not appropriate to make the exchange from the Districts side at this time? The Districts wouldn't save a million dollars a year. It's kind of like holding a gun at somebody's head and saying we want you to agree on the one side, but we're not going to agree with you on the other side. The cost is rather minimal - one million dollar savings versus $100,000 worth of cost on the Districts side. We're asking you tonight to not adopt the recommendation that is here before you. Do not adopt that recommendation. We would ask you instead to adopt the original recommendation which included the agreement between management and the labor organizations. It wasn't one that was shared happily on both sides totally, but it was one that was a negotiated agreement. We would ask for you to do that. In the event that you would decide to do that, the process hasn't yet concluded. That meet and confer negotiation process still has a number of steps to go including the impasse process and of course we haven't even begun since we've only reached the first process which was to try to reach an original agreement, which of course we did. That would be our request, and I believe it is shared by the other groups, but I'll let them speak on their own behalf. Would you like me to indicate what my position was on Item #15(c)(1) or come up at a later time? JC: It's on the agenda here as 2%. It was originally recommended by staff at 3% and it did go through the board review process and the committees felt that was too high and reduced it. That's why it's that number, it's not a typo. Mark Reid: I guess that again brings up my original premise relative to process. The process is that we've got the cart before the horse. The negotiation process is suppose to take place first, then the agreements and then to the Board for ratification and/or approval. What has happened here appears to be kind of the reverse. For example, this entire item of whether there is a merit pool, how much, what the criteria is, all the rules and regulations, how people move, all of those things are subject to the meet and confer process. So if you adopt something in firm concrete and we turn around say we don't agree with that, we've got a problem on our hands all the way around. So, I'm not suggesting to you that you not adopt something in premise, but when I saw the two versions to three, I was shocked, because the last time we saw it in committee it was agreed by everybody that it was three and two, and now we see it's two and two. DFM: Mark is correct that this is out of sequence but I think that what is out of sequence is the timing of the contract. We agree that it is a meet and confer item. On the other hand, we had to have a board decision of how big the pool is going to be so we could sit down with our employees at the beginning of the next fiscal year to say, "how much is in that pool?", so that they would know in advance what a outstanding or exceeds expectation award could be. So it's true, we're out of sequence here, and I think in the next contract one of the things we will want to do is change the end date of that contract so that we'll get back into the right sequence and have this done in advance. JAWPDOMBSUNIMNOTES.05 Page 10 Mark Reid: Don, I certay have no problem with that as you�Mnow. We've discussed it by communication or by letter. The only problem that I have is just that the understanding that the whole item including the amount is subject to the process and therefore, we JAW: I think that is clear on the agenda. This is a management proposal subject to meet and confer. It specifically states that. Mark Reid: I understand that. But management proposals are generally not adopted by the Board in advance of discussions. JC: Wait a minute. I think you're missing the point here. We're both making the same point. You're union has the responsibility to ratify a decision and so does our board have a responsibility to ratify a decision. All we're doing tonight is agreeing to a decision that was recommended by a sub-committee, recognizing you have to ratify it. This is not a done deal if you choose it not to be. Mark Reid: I certainly understand. Richard Brown: I am a Staff Representative for the Orange County Employees Association. I'm here this evening representing three separate bargaining units here at the Districts. the Administrative/Clerical Unit, the Engineering Unit and the Technical Services Unit. I don't have a lot to say, I think Mr. Reid said it pretty well. We went through the same process, we were contacted by the Districts a number of months ago stating that there were a number of meet and confer items that at this time they wanted to discuss with us, though our initial reaction was, as being contacted by the Districts, we had some reservations about opening up our current agreement with the Districts which expires in November of this year. In good faith, and I emphasize the good faith part of it, we did sit down and we did discuss a number of items with the Districts representatives and those items concerned health insurance, the changing of the carrier, dental insurance and the changing of the provider, and providing a vision care for the Districts employees. We thought in good faith, we came to an agreement with the Districts representatives. What you have here before you this evening. Item 15(e), is not that agreement and as Mr. Reid had said, the process has a number of additional steps that we need to go through if indeed we're going to continue on this line. Again, we would also request that you not adopt this item, and that you direct the Districts representatives back to the bargaining table and we're prepared to start immediately on further discussion on these items. Thank you. David Hamilton: Local 501 Operating Engineers on behalf of the Operations and Maintenance group. What the two previous gentlemen said is absolutely correct. It's the same for all of us. We entered into an agreement with the Districts based on the package that included a vision plan. If you don't want to do that, if you don't like the plan, it seems to me that you're stepping over a dollar to get to a dime. You're sitting here ruling tonight and you're talking about throwing away $100,000 here and J:IWPD0CIBSWlN96W0TES.05 Page 11 $1,000,000 there talkinb'dig bucks. What we're talking abouYs one plan that will help our membership your employees, it is something that will do good for them. According to our calculations, which may be a little loose, about 75% of the people you represent as Directors, the people in your District, already have a vision plan. We're asking for the same thing - no more, no less. We are here to meet with the management in good faith. I'd like to make a personal comment - it's been a long time since I've been before this group and I think the management here has changed to 100% good direction. I'm looking forward to an amenable negotiations this year. I hope that this is not indicative of where we're going. We're here to negotiate for the membership. I'm not going to pull any punches, we don't have any tricks. We just want to come in and negotiate a contract and get it done. I don't think you have to be in the apprehensive situation where you we're last year. We hired security people to look over what is going on. I think you waste a lot of money in some areas that you don't need to. As far as consultants and attorneys. You don't need an attorney in negotiations. We're going to meet with you in good faith. Consider this tonight-this is not what we agreed to. JC: We have had a lot of discussion about it too and I think you have to respect that we have to agree and reach something as a Board. You're presentation is considering this that you agreed and we didn't and therefore, we're suppose to buy it is a little unfair from our prospective. We have a responsibility to our constituency. They have a responsibility to evaluate these decisions,just as much as you do. So, we were not trying to be disrespectful, as far as this process is concerned. Our interpretation was the meet and confer was going to happen over the next three months for the next contract. As this chart illustrates, the new item on the board, and I apologize for the fuzziness of it -the new item to us was the vision of$99,000. That was not in the prior contract, that was something that came out of the negotiations with the insurance provider and we felt that was not fair to all of a sudden to say that's okay without going through the meet and confer process as you're describing. So in effect, what we have said is, "lets not do that, we'll do that later when we go through the meet and confer process", we're not taking that off the table as far as future negotiations are concerned. We're just not throwing it in as a freebie right now because we didn't view ourselves going through these contract. Normally, we would have done this in Closed Session. We would have had a lot of background and briefing on it. We didn't do that, primarily because, this new insurance policy offers us the opportunity to save $50,000 a month. Now, you may consider that peanuts, but we don't and that starts today. Now we could delay this 90 or 120 days and lose $400,000 or we can save us all $50,000 a month by making this quick decision. We thought that was very valuable, both for you as employees and for our constituents. Now if you want us not to agree with that, that's your choice. If you want to negotiate over the vision or whatever else you want to negotiate over, we can do that. But tonight, the recommendation to this Board, is to put forth the recommendation that we've described here and not put this vision expenditure into the budget right now. That's why we came to this decision. Any other Board member that would like to comment on this? John Gullixson has requested that we go into Closed Session with this and that is fine. J:\WPD0C\BSUNIN96\N0TES.05 Page 12 Comments could not beheard. Mike Peterman: Are you talking about savings to employees specifically out of pocket? In addition to the $138,000, the out-of-pocket expenses that they would save has not been calculated, but it would be about 10% if your looking at increasing 90% coverage up to 100%, that's in addition to the $138,000. Comments could not be heard. JC: We're putting ourselves, all of us, you and us, in a very untenable situation, trying to negotiate. You're interruptions and your attitude in a public meeting trying to negotiate your salary and your bonuses and everything is not the way to conduct business. I have never done that before in my life in public office. We've got board members that want to go into Closed Session and we'll make the recommendation. Then we can go back and negotiate it, the way it is normally done, we're not going to do it here. If you want to debate it out like this, to try to decide who's right, there's going to be a lot of losers. If you have a statement to make, you're entitled to make it, but I don't want to argue about it. David Hamilton: Those are potential savings based on the fact that if the people opt for the maxicare. They may not all opt for that so it may not come out that much savings. What we entered into a tentative agreement, based upon this Board and based upon the approval of our membership, what we agreed to was one thing. The package that you have before you tonight is not what we agreed to ladies and gentlemen. If you vote on it, you are voting on something that we did not agree on. JC: Well we did not agree to your proposal, so we are making a counter proposal. Comments could not be heard. Richard Brown: Perhaps we could defer to the Districts legal staff. The Districts came to the labor organizations, requested that the contracts be opened up. The labor organizations agreed to open up the contracts. We did meet and discuss a number of items. So here we are today, we have open contracts, we have no agreement pursuant to the Districts rules and regulations there are further processes that need to lake place and that's all we're asking you to do. JC: I think we do have an agreement, we're asking that we change that agreement because of an opportunity that came before us. So, to characterize it that there is no agreement, this is not the case. There is an existing agreement, we think we have an opportunity to do a better one. Anyway, we've discussed this enough, is there a JAWPDOMBSUNMNOTES.05 - Page 13 motion? Yes, to o into g dosed Session? No opposition? Okay, we'll discuss it in Closed Session. TLW: I would advise, that under the provisions of the Brown Act 54957.6, you are in fact authorized to go into Closed Session for purposes for meeting with your management negotiating team to discuss the terms and conditions of wages, benefits and other terms and conditions of employment. In my opinion, that the proposal submitted to you by management exactly fits within the parameter of that provision of the Brown Act then you are authorized to enter. JC: Can we defer this Closed Session until we do go into Closed Session and continue with the open session business. #16 - Bay Side Drive Pump Station Sewage Spill Nancy Wheatley: There is a summary of the action in your package. We have received a complaint and a recommended penalty accessed against us by the Regional Water Quality Control Board for the Bay Bridge Pump Station. We had an opportunity to pay the penalty and not have a public hearing, however, in consultation with General Manager and the Joint Chair, we concluded that it was important for any public who wanted to have an opportunity to comment on the spill to have that opportunity. That hearing will be held on May 31 st. It is stafrs belief that the $50,000 penalty is very reasonable given the gravity of the spill that occurred. We have worked closely with the residents and Michelle Tuchman knows the details of how many residents have settled their claims. We are also going to propose at the hearing on May 31 st that the amount of the penalty go towards funding both the temporary and potentially the long-term solution at the Bolsa Chica State Park so that the money we pay as a penalty stays in Southern California to fix a real problem. The Regional Water Quality Control Board has to accept that recommendation. We don't know if they will, but we are going to make that recommendation. JC: Motion? Discussion? Discussion could not be heard. DFM: I'm not sure if I can give you legislative history of that, but 1 can tell you that they do it routinely and they've made it clear to me. I think it's a way to try to ensure compliance with the laws with respect to clean water, but what they're hitting us on is not the fact that we had a spill. What they're hitting us on is the fact we did not respond quickly enough. They say we have a lot of spills but they don't always get fined. Its the lack of quick response to the issue that they are unhappy about. I have to say, given what they could have done legally, in terms of the amount of the fine, we got off, I'd say relatively lightly, which is not to say that we like it, but if we could use those JAWPDOMBSUIN95WOTES.05 Page 14 funds for under construe!!Ke purpose, like the Bolsa Chica Park problem, then I think we would say we've gotten off very well. I thought you were going to ask the question, "why we agree to have a public hearing', and I think the staff felt and John agreed that if there are people that want to complain about it, then they ought to have to do that and we didn't want to appear to not to be allowing people due process if they're unhappy about the consequences of our actions or in-actions. Comments could not be heard. JC: Okay, we have a motion and a second -any other discussion? Any opposition? Motion passes. #17 Proposed Ordinances - Increasing Sewer Connection Charges JC: This is individual Districts. Tom, did you want to introduce these issues? TLW: My comments would apply to all of the Districts. They are identical and in fact there is a very brief memo in the agenda package from me noting the ordinances and these were in fact reviewed by the FAHR Committee and then were brought to the Joint Boards at your meeting last month and were reviewed at that time. The change is quite nominal, it's noted in the staff report as well as mine. The connection charge for dwelling units goes up $10.00 increase and then from $2,350 to $2,360. it's the first move in four years and it's based upon the change in the ENR, that's the Engineering News Record, which is the basic index that the Districts' have used for man years. The Boards reviewed this and did recommend it and as I noted last month, if the Boards, in fact, acted to make the adjustment last month, they there's a pro forma matter. We bring the Ordinance back to get it implemented at this meeting. The adoption will be at your next meeting in June and effective 60-days thereafter. JC: We'll move them by individual District and if it's your pleasure, you can move the item: 17(c) - District 1 - unanimous 17(d) - District 2 - unanimous 17(e) - District 3 - unanimous 17(f) - District 5 - unanimous 17(g) - District 6 - unanimous 17(h) - District 7- unanimous 17(i) - District 11 - unanimous 170) - District 13 - unanimous 17(k) - District 14- not applicable JC: That completes Item#17 and with that we'll move into Closed Session. J:IWPD0CtBSN41N96W0TES.05 Page 15 J:\WPDOC\BS\MIN96WOTES.05 Page 16 STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, 1 hereby certify that the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 held on k�/J6 ___ Q U 19f�l was duly posted for public inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on 19�. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this a4aday of Penny Kyle,Mcreta of each of the Boards of Directors o County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14 of Orange County, California BSIFoimslF M