Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-02-28 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA y s . February 22, 1996 NOTICE OF MEETING ,ban.: JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS 1714)962241 1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS mailing addr...: NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 P0. Bcx8127 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Founmin Valleg CA 92728&8127 aareat address: WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 1996 - 7:30 P.M. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fauntaln Valle,CA 927087018 DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 M.mbe Agent ess The Regular Meeting of the Joint Boards of Directors of County Sanitation • Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, wi0 citie. be held at the above locationtime and date. Anaheim J / Brea Buena Perk Cypr.. Way Fountain Palley Boar a tary Pullerton Huntington Beach Irvine La Habra La Palma Tentatively - Scheduled Upcoming Meetings Los Alamitos Nesport Beach Orange Placentia STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday,February 28, 1996,at 5:30 pm Santa Ann Beal Beach Blanton Tustin OPERATIONS,MAINTENANCE AND - Wednesday, March 6, 1996,at 5:30 pm vg.Pan: TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE Yorba Linda County of Orange PLANNING, DESIGN AND - Thursday, March 7, 1996,at 5:30 pm sanitary Distriate CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE Cost. Mesa Garden crave FINANCE,ADMINISTRATIVE AND - Wednesday,March 13, 1996,at 5:30 pm Midway City HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE Water Districts trvine Ranch EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - Wednesday,March 20, 1996, at 5:30 pm A Public Wastewater and Environmental Management Agency Committed to Proti the Environment Blnce 1954 JOINT BOARD MEETING DATES Month Joint Board Meetings February Feb 28, 1996 March Mar 27, 1996 April Apr 24, 1996 May May 22, 1996 June Jun 26, 1996 July Jul 24, 1996 August Aug 28, 1996 September Sep 25, 1996 October Oct 23, 1996 November Nov 20, 1996 December Dec 18, 1996 January Jan 22, 1997 February Feb 26, 1997 /COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA r e February 22, 1996 phone: (7143 9e2z411 msiUm,address: To the Chair and Members P.O.Box 8127 of the Joint Boards of Directors Founmin Valley,CA 92726.8127 Subject: Board Letter street adds..: 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92708-7018 The following are items that you may find interesting. If you need additional information on any of the items, please call me. Revised Water Anenda issued by EPA Assistant Administrator Member On January 17, 1996, EPA Assistant Administrator for Water Bob Perciasepe issued AgB""°6 a revised agenda for FY 96-97, outlining EPA's priorities for the Office of Water. The • new agenda builds on the agenda developed at the end of 1994 and adds improved Miss communications to the operating framework elements—applying "common sense"to all activities and "place-based" organization. The agenda also incorporates A"BB'a Administrator Browner's goal of using twenty percent for all program resources for Buena Park place-based environmental protection, and integration of watershed management into Cypress all program activities. In addition to continuing emphasis on improved drinking water F4uatain Valley protection and wet weather controls, comprehensive wetlands management has been Fullerton added as a programmatic priority. Emphasis remains on the urban wet weather Huntington Beach P 9 P Y P Irvina advisory committee established last year and on improving the state nonpoint source La Habra pollution protection programs. EPA is currently working with states to develop La Pelme guidance on strengthening state non point source programs. Los Ale rhos 9 9 9 P P 9 Newport Beach Orange Attached is a copy of the synopsis of the National Water Program Agenda for the Placentia Future: 1996-1997. Santa Ana Seal Beach Stanton Recent Settlement Agreements with Permittees Tustin l.11e Park In the event a ermittee exceeds emit limits, administrative complaints are issued rorba Linde P P P that can include penalties. Hearings are scheduled to address the complaints. In county of grange accordance with Resolution No. 95-112, a committee consisting of the Director of Finance, the Director of Technical Services, and General Counsel have the authority Sanitary Districts to negotiate and enter into agreements up to $50,000 and enforce compliance orders. Cocoa Move Firms that have entered into settlement agreements and the penalties follow: Garden Grove 9 Midway City Chevron U.S.A. Production Company $20,000 water Districts Stevens Metal Finishing, Inc. $12,000 Irvine Ranch Imperial Containers & Display, Inc. $10,000 and 2 days permit suspension South Coast Circuits $23,000 Alphanetics $42,000 PCA Metal Finishing $60,000 Pentadyne Circuits $23,000 Anaheim Plating & Polishing $20,000 A-Able $28,027.21 American Septic $62,001.15 A Public Wastewater and Environmental Management Agency Committed to Protecting toe Environment Since 1954 Chair and Members of the Joint Boards of Directors Page 2 February 22, 1996 Early Retirement Incentive Since the beginning of the year, four employees have taken advantage of the early retirement incentive. One had 31 years of service and two had 24 and 21 years, respectively. There are two others that will be retiring by the end of March. This saves money and gives management increased Flexibility. Grand Jury Visit The newly sealed Grand Jury visited the Sanitation Districts on January 30. Staff made a presentation on our mission and operation, and gave them a tour of the treatment plant. Many of the members were unaware of our agency and there were many questions. Executive Summary of Source Control Annual Report Attached is a copy of the Executive Summary of the Annual Report for the Source Control Division. Section 1.3, Program Summary, provides a very informative overview of the activities of the division, and many of these will be used for benchmarking. If you have questions on this Summary, please contact Mahin Talebi, Source Control Manager, at 714/962-2411. extension 3800. Cellular Telephone Policy As a result of several newspaper articles on cellular phone use at other agencies, staff formalized the attached cellular telephone policy. As in the past, all personal phone calls are the responsibility of the employee. For those employees that have their own cellular phones, the Districts reimburse business calls only upon presentation of an invoice from the cellular company which has been approved by their supervisor. Status of Bacterial Problems at Bolsa Chica State Beach The bacterial problems at Boise Chica State Beach continue to defy our efforts to find an identifiable source of contamination. The sanitary system at the State Park remains the most likely source, but we have so far been unable to identify a precise location that is leaking. We have, however, made some progress. Since sewage from the rest rooms, which is fresh water, would "float" on the more brackish groundwater, we have been sampling groundwater seepage at low tide. We have found an area of the beach where the seepage is both contaminated with bacteria and somewhat lower in salinity than the sea water, suggesting that it may be coming from a leak in the sanitary system. Unfortunately, dye testing has been unsuccessful in pinpointing a leak. Alternatives for locating the leak include pressure testing the system and/or video-taping the lines upstream of the contaminated seepage. We will meet soon with the County's Health Department and the State Park officials to determine the next steps. Chair and Members of the Joint Boards of Directors Page 3 February 22, 1996 Clarifying Municipal Liability under Superfund AMSA believes that the original Superfund statute provided safeguards for municipalities from third-party litigation. For several years, AMSA members have worked under the assumption that publicly-owned treatment works (POTWs) were protected from Superfund liability by the careful wording of the definition of"facility' in the statute to exclude publicly-owned treatment works, and through an exemption provided for"federally-permitted releases." Excluding POTWs from the statute's standard of strict,joint and several liability makes sense. As a service to the community, POTWs collect and treat wastewater from a variety of industrial sources, including those that regularly utilize hazardous and toxic chemicals in the production process. POTWs can provide this service because they regulate the amounts of such chemicals at the points of discharge to the POTW, and because they operate highly-effective and efficient facilities that meet and achieve water quality standards and produce high-quality residual biosolids. In these roles, the POTWs act in concert with federal and state regulations as co- regulators under the Clean Water Act. POTWs do not generate the regulated waste, they receive it in controlled amounts, transport it to their treatment works and treat it. As such, they are wholly passive with respect to any such waste that may be released. Nevertheless, recent litigation assessing liability against a POTW for a release of a hazardous pollutant being transported to the treatment works by pipeline has left POTWs vulnerable to Superfund-related third-party lawsuits. In AMSA's view, this constitutes an unintended shift in responsibility for hazardous waste cleanup from private generating parties to taxpayers. Without a clarifying amendment to Superfund, additional restrictions on industry would be the only effective means of avoiding liability. This remaining option would impose a significant financial burden on not only local industries, but the municipal economies that they help to support. Excluding POTWs from the federal Superfund statue will not compromise the environment. State laws ensure that, when negligent, POTWs will maintain responsibility for the costs of environmental remediation. Specifically, AMSA is urging Congress to: Amend the Superfund statute to clarify the exclusion of POTWs from the statute's standard of strict,joint and several liability. Status of SAWPA Agreement Late last year, the Districts' staff and the staff of the Santa Ana Watershed Management Project (SAWPA) finalized a new draft agreement between the two agencies which would settle the longstanding differences on SAWPA's payments to the Districts for treatment and disposal capacity. The agreement was presented to the SAWPA Board of Directors in January. The Chair and Members of the Joint Boards of Directors Page 4 February 22, 1996 SAWPA directors had only a short time to review the agreement, but believed that its general approach was fair to both parties. They did, however, want to spend more time discussing specific provisions with staff to better understand how the agreement might affect their relationships with their customers and member agencies. The SAWPA members were also concerned that each individual member not be liable for the debts of the other members. During the subsequent discussions with SAWPA directors, further issues were raised that are associated with the internal cost allocation procedures for SAWPA. These issues do not pertain to the terms and conditions of the agreement with the Sanitation Districts; however, some SAWPA member agencies have taken the position that these should be solved prior to SAWPA's signing the agreement because the cost allocation will affect each member's share of the capital charge imposed. While these issues are being discussed, the SAWPA Board does not plan to consider the agreement. Prior to the completion of the draft agreement, Joint Chair Cox met with SAWPA Chair Wayne Holcomb. The Chairs concurred that the draft agreement was equitable and should move forward. Chair Cox plans to write Chair Holcomb to request his assistance in moving the draft agreement forward and bringing this matter to a conclusion. If there is no response from SAWPA within a reasonable period of time, the Joint Boards may have to consider further action to resolve the dispute on purchase of additional treatment and disposal capacity. Possible Termination of Contract with Anionic Polymer Vendor At the August 8, 1995 meeting the Directors authorized a contract for anionic polymer with Polypure, Inc. The contract included a termination clause if the quality and required quantities of polymer fail to conform to the specifications. Staff has determined that the product does not perform in accordance with the specifications and have given the supplier a letter of intent to terminate the contract at the end of a 14-day testing period on an alternate product. If the results of the testing are unsatisfactory, the Directors will be requested to terminate the contract and award a new contract to another supplier. Depending on when the final results are received, the action may be on this month's agenda or on the March agenda. AMSA Recoanition in the Congressional Record Attached is a copy of the bipartisan statement in the Congressional Record on November 7, 1995, by Representatives Bud Shuster(R-PA), Chair of the House Public Works and Transportation Committee and Jim Oberstar(D-MN), the Committee's Ranking Minority Member, commemorating the Association's 25th Anniversary and marking the official date of its incorporation. Chair and Members of the Joint Boards of Directors Page 5 February 22, 1996 CASA Report on Constitution Revision Commission and Privatization Attached is a January 7, 1996 fax from CASA on the latest activities of the CRC, as well as a summary of the Reason Foundation Report on Privatization. Next Directors Workshop on the Water Conservation and Reclamation Element of the Strategic Plan The next workshop for the Directors on the Water Conservation and Reclamation element of the Strategic Plan has been tentatively scheduled for Saturday, May 4. 1 hope that you all calendar this important meeting and plan to attend. Staff is already working on this event, and informational material will be sent well before the meeting for your review. High Settleable Solids Incident On Sunday, February 18, 1996, an operational change in the secondary treatment (activated sludge or"AS") portion of the Districts' Reclamation Plant No. 1 resulted in a permit violation for final effluent"settleable solids." The laboratory measured and reported a value of 4.0 mUL (the instantaneous permit limit is 3.0 mUL). The increase in solids was probably caused by Operations rapidly increasing the flow to the AS Plant which caused a surge of water through the treatment system allowing settleable solids to enter the final effluent stream. Notification to Operations by the laboratory of a high reading of settleable solids in the interplant line allowed Operations to lower the flow through the AS plant to correct the cause of the effluent violation. On Tuesday afternoon, February 20, 1996, the laboratory analyst who did the analyses reported the violation to his supervisor. The supervisor notified the Environmental Management Division (EMD) which immediately notified the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region. Affected parties within the Districts held a meeting to review operational practices, sampling, and report procedures to identify areas that need improvement. Operations has reviewed treatment procedures with the operators to prevent future occurrences, is evaluating continuous monitors, and will implement guidelines to assure immediate reporting of permit violations to EMD. The incident lasted less than two hours, and it did not have the potential to affect the public health or environment. Bay Bridge Spill Report As you probably have already heard, the Bay Bridge Pump Station, located in Newport Beach on Pacific Coast Highway between Dover and Bayside Drive, overflowed at approximately 5:50 a.m. on February 22, causing several thousand gallons of raw sewage to overflow manholes and back up into residential units. The cause of the problem is being investigated, but it appears that a water level sensor malfunctioned, causing the pumps in the station to shut down. Because of the malfunction, the pumps can only be started manually until the problem is corrected. Chair and Members of the Joint Boards of Directors Page 6 February 22, 1996 After receiving a call from the City of Newport Beach at 5:50 a.m., we immediately dispatched maintenance crews to the pump station. While they were an route, at approximately 6 a.m., maintenance workers from the City of Newport Beach made their way into the pump station and restarted the pumps manually, relieving the overflow condition. Initial reports are that sixteen homes were affected by the spill. We immediately dispatched additional personnel to the site to assist local residents in clean-up efforts and to handle media relations. We will be conducting a full investigation of the incident and will be providing a detailed report at the February 28 Joint Board meeting. Update on the Financial Information System The response date on the RFP for the Financial Information System was extended for thirty days to ensure that we had a competitive group of proposals. At the request of several vendors, we have agreed to extend for an additional seven days. First round of proposals are now due from vendors on March 14, 1996. The RFP has been simplified to encourage response; software only will be the focus of the initial proposals. Several firms have expressed interest in the project and have been on site to review our technical library. The proposals will first be reviewed for responsiveness and then for content or qualifications. Selected finalist vendors will go through a more rigorous proposal process including site visits and demonstrations of real installations. Staff is planning to make a recommendation for the new Financial Information System at the May FAHR Committee meeting. Implementation is scheduled for FY '97. We hope to have the payroll module operational by January '97, followed by the General Ledger in the spring. The new system is expected to be fully operational by FY '98. If you would like additional information on any of the above items, please call me. Donald F. McIntyre General Manager DFM:jt a.aw000awnr ()Lrmwnneae Attachments: Synopsis of National Water Program Agenda. Executive Summary of Source Control Annual Report. Cellular Telephone Policy. Recognition of AMSA, Congressional Record, November 7, 1995. Fax from CASA, February 7, 1996, Constitution Revision Commission and Privatization. 0126/96 15:17 ENS RESO-RCES INC 002 National Water Program Agenda for the Future: 1996-1997 IOModYdian Imidug back over 1995,I see a year of uanondo er progress and change for the Agency and the National Water Program. Changing rite way we work and reorganizing the Regional offices nude this a demanding year. The continuing budget uncertainty and government shut-downs haw emoted new hurdles. We mood to remind ourselves that the nation's rivers,lakes,estuaries and ooran and groundwater resource cautious to need our stewardship and protection, "to budget controversies can be distracting and challenging,they pale in comparison to the tavuonmental and health protection needs of the nation's waters. We main and we sae remain focused an our vital mission of providing that protection. 1 want io thank every employeo for the dedication and persevaance you have shown,and for the good work you have done each day toward providing sefq clean water for all Americans. The Updated Agenda Ilia second Agenda maps this year's steps toward our goal,it doe vet set a complctcy new direction.Our priority frameworks—the oonmemr some:and community based approaches should enhance all of our work. Our solid foundation of protection programs will enable us to reinvigorate our efforts to assure safe drinking watr and to link and improve our important wet weather programs. We will also commie to seek ways to mcdemize our management of the National Water program. Over the post several years,we haw been making significant changes m our wetlands program to enhance protection and make regulations man fair,flexible and eRbctive. I added wedamis numagement ar a program prlorrry in this Agenda in order to emphasize the importance 1 place on using the charged procedures and relationships with co-rmgularms and those we regulate. Viewing wcdards holistically—on a watershed basis— not only shengdrens our community-based emphasis,it improve our ability to protest these vital resources. We mane focus on achieving the goal of no net loss of wetlands and the long term goal of increasing the quality and quantity of the Nation's wetlands resource base. lmproving eommemimnon with our parmers m awironmemah protection and with the public at large is my second addition to the Agenda. I believe that water program mployous must rlrarly communicate the importance of our mission and how the work war do helps pwplc in cities,owns and rural areas avioss the nation. In 1996-1997 we will concentrate an shap®ng communication skills,malung our information more acoesible to the public,describing the Importance of clean waive and safe drinking water to Americans,and providing opportunities for the public to let us know their views. In addition,I have a personal oam ahnicat to better camm mucato with Water Progreso employ=all aaoss the country using imegreted electronic mail, voice mail,and other now technologies. 01/26/% 15:ie ENS RESOj?CES INC 003 , During 1995 the Agency,together with States and Tribes,created the National Fnvboame dal Pcrfomwrco Pammbip System(NEPPS)and Perfomane¢PaMxa Wp Omens(PPOs). Creation of this system marks" important change in our reletimitip with Sores and Tribes and undmourc,our com aumncut to empowerment of State and Tribal programs. Our nest step Is to harmonize these new admirmstmtiwe tool,with Headquarters-Regional Management Agreements to allow unproved elrciermy and coordination between headquarters,State,and regional roles. Part ID of the Agenda explains how we will use this system to become more o136etiw in getting curjobs done. We must also tram the public as a partner in environmental protection. We must fad the most cost offodive and ofeient ways to meta meal communities enviroemenal nods wink carrying out our Iefjslativc mandates. We trust easum environmental Justice by providing equal access to the infrastructure our programs support, equal access to participate m our programs,and equal protection under the laws wo implement. Finally.all of our partners must have the opportunity to participate in discussions leading to decisions about what works best to bring about dean.safe water. What this Agenda Means to You Like last year's Agenda,this document saves as the overall guidance for the National Water Program.This Agenda has grown out of many disaasions with the Regius and the program offaoes. It ommmnieates what I want us to aaonplish so that wa can all pull together toward common goela. It will sum as the blueprint and starting point for developing the FY 1997 Mangemet Agreements between Headquarters and the Regions and as major input to R%4w-Sate and Region-Tribe agteaxats. This Agenda needs our partners'support if we are to aoam,ptish it. No task can be conducted by EPA in isolation,without complete consultation and partnership with our Federal,Sate,Tribal and other EPA media program partners. Therefore,I hope that each water employee will sham the Agenda with people inside and outside the Agency. I appreciate your willinlpuas to accept the challenges of changing the way wo do ourjob. Thanks for your patients,continuing vision and dodication to our mission in the face of sonic of the Agency's greatest challenges. 2 01/26/% 15:18 ENS RESaJRCFS IIIC 004 7 National Water Program Agenda for the Future 1. Priarity Operating Fmotmork Throe overriding eonoepts ttarac the National Water Programs Agenda for the Future: common stasc,place- based program ddivory,and guul uummuniraLlm. The ability to focus on this operating framework is built on a solid foundation ofbastc wmer programs,analytical work,data development,management tools,and accountability systems. Our operating framework will common to rely on that foundation and will focus, sharpen and shape implemcnest..a ofthe basic water programs that have successfully improved our wafers for the last twenty-five years. A. Appfy Common Sense is AR We Do The National Water Program is committed to reinmition—finding and using innovative ways to do curjobs better. We am increasing Em l ility,enoouragiag oellabmatimr and innovation,and cutting red tape while retaining programmatic and fiscal aoronmability. We are keeping what works well and changing what does not We are,seeking common soso solutions—smarter,ehraper ways to get owunsurnamal results. Activities wc71 purauc to promote common srasc approaches include - • Suppornog proposals far rcmvrata g environmental regulation: -Project XL(excellence&leadership)pilot efforts of companies,facilities, States and conmmnifies to achieve custctfoctive environmental results that exceed these required by law; "Common Sense Initiative that focuses on sk industry scams; -Promming effluent trading in watersheds; -Simplifying the pemuthng process. • Combnuing our comprehensive reinvcntim of the NPOE3 program We will continue heavy invlvenrent of stakeholders in this ongoing process that includes steps to reduce pamimoc monitoring and reporting requirements by 25%,streamline permit application data rcquirrnraas,and further expand the use of e6'icimt general P=nts; • Identifying dayto-dny impkntmtatum activities that do not make sense,by asking our co-rcgulators, the public,and those we regulate. Making appropriate changes that TcBM Agency-wide initiatives on customer ac w,e0im uncy,oversight reduction,and streamlining; • Examining data collccum and reporting efforts and systems to ddcrmine what can be reported electronically and reduced or eliminated in the interest of reducing reporting burden—without reducing our ability to track programs,eminmetzmal trcneb,and funds; • Using the EPAStam Opwating Committee to identify(through a continuous feedback process)and ehsmgc or eliminate low-value®dded work- 3 01/26/96 15:19 EMS RESO-RCES INC 005 B. Organize, Work and Co»unanfeate to Hotear "Places" People are eomemed about problems in their local streams,watn supplies,landfills,incinerators or wetlands— problems they can identify with because they can sty then to their own comommucs. 'through the Admimstratmfs Community-Based Environmental Ptotoction(CBEP)Initiative,the Agency will focus 20%of all modia programs'resource,including Regional resources,on actions that will promote plaeobased mvuoarrounal protection. EPA caa be dirctly involved is only a Bactimr otall communities, so moat of our resource must be used to promote and cuable placnbascd environmental promotion by others. EPA must help to create a framework within which emmnamity efforts ran be led by others,while EPA provides tools,assistance,and infertlatlon as coded. EPA assisancc mums moncatigg our bast programs and wodC+mg with states to reorient their programs;it means rodesigaing sane regulatory and non-rcguWory programs to oomplcaumt local efforts better;and it means promoting this approach in other orgmimtime. Because EPA one only be in a few place,we will need to carefully select those priority places where we will be directly involved in carrying out to work,platys where we will participate,and places wberc we will net be directly involved but will help others to acb m e teir goals by providing tools or technical assistance. Our experimx with the watershed approach has giwp us a good start in identifying and accomplishing to objectives of CBEP. We will build oi the success of the waterbbod approach by seeking more opportunities to integrate our programs with thine of other media offices so that we era assst communities to perform oomprehwa ve envirurateam protection. I believe that each Regional Water Program and the Office of Water medr to establish em Internal structa r, like a working group, to assure cross program integration ofCBFP Working groups will be able to identify actions being taken by other parts of the Agency that"aid affect surface and ground water quality,and take steps to convey the perspective or and share id'ormation from water programs. Water prograns can share the tools developed by and to lesions leaned Born the National Estuary Program, the Octal Water Body programs,and small"smlc watershed projects to spud the progr ss of plat based efforts across the nation. To edrawn the Agency's ability to hnplranent the CBEP initiative,OW and/or the Regions will: • Work with Stales,Tribes and local gmnmurrunt units to dctermvrc which tools(criteria,atandardv, monitoring and measumnm metledelogics,risk asswsmwu methods,waershd education and outreach,and fate and transport models)EPA can develop or share with them through training,and how EPA can use its authorities to assist them in implaaenting CBEP(including surface and ground water Itregrains); • Work with States to develop Tow Maximum Daily l.oads/Wastcload AllocationV1,,d Allocations for priority water quality limited - - -'-'wararbodkis. With our partners,apply a flexible approach to develop and implement warm quality-band permit limits and best management practices to roduco loadings so that water quality standards and deippatod urn etc met; • Develop new ednput"models integrating GIS inforeamil With foie and transport models to facilitate ef0uerht trading among point and—point sources within watadrds,ad train Regions and Stance in their use; 4 4 • Develop the Water portion of the Agency-wide multi-year CBEP Action Plan and deploy national water program FT&as needed to do place-based work with States,Tribes and local goverrmeuts. Work with our co-regulators to achieve a goal of oncalim Staldfribal programs to support CBEP; • Work with Au Programs to support implc me alion of Section 112 of the Clean Air Act,to assess pmblCtm;dad develop strategies to reduce air dcposWm of ch o icals,hmvy metals(especially mercury),nutrtarts and other pollutants(especially nitrogen dimuclo)to waters of the United Stales through pollution prevention,and cooperate in the Croat Waters related activities; • Establish foams with the Office of Enforcement and Comply(OECA)and its Regional tarmtcrparts to coordinate our priorities and activr cs; • Issue an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulc along reviewing the criteria and standards program in view of the trend toward watershed and cross-media approaches in marry States/f'riboa,and issue a water quality Criteria Development Plan describing the ilm n:direction of the criteria Program; • Continue integrating NPDES Programs into the Watershed Prmocaion Approach by allowing resources dedicated to developing permits to vary depending on euvironrnemW impacts of each sour«, supporting dcvdopakm of Statewide watershed protection frameworks to partnership with Statrsllfribes,and by surnmlimn and consolidating information requirements for NPDES. C Corrrruanhsre Program Actions and Policies Max Effectively The National Water Program is responsible for protecting and restoring the quality of our nation's waters. From providing raft,reliable souroes of cloaking water to prutcrring valuable habitat for fish and wildlife to clearing up toxic pollution in our rivers and streams,our efforts help pro azt public health and the covironmmmt and enure a better quality of life for all Americans. We need strong coordination with our co-rogulators at State and Tribal agencies and continuous input Gan environmental and public incrust groups,private industry, and the public. Much greater-emphasis is needed on communications for Were key stakcholdcrs to understand and fully participate to the decision-making pree ssys dud drive our actions In particular,we must emphasis the results our work products. We most Canvey information in plain,simple and concise language, improve the prim quality of our materials,and build stranger emmnweicaIion networks. To improve our ability to exmvnnnicasc,the National Water Program will: • Desmgrate spccifie staff in each program to idcd4,prepare for,and manage conmmun ewcur opportunities,including: -Prepare non-tcehniml fad sheets for all major policy and regulatory actions(as well as commonly misunderstood issues)so that stakeholders can understand what is being done and what remelts(Le., ecological and economic bcncfts)are to be expected; -Publieia the availability of products and services designed to provide the public with Miter information about water issuq such as the national Sat Drinking Water and Wctlands hollince,the National Fish Consumption database,and wale, Interact addresses; -Initiate a process enabling us to emtununieudc national andcommunhy-bawd asuLLs.of program activities at bast annually to the general public,the Oovemors,stakeholders and Congress,using both indicators of environmental conditions and programmatic activity measures. 5 91/26i% 15:20 ENS RESO;RCES INC eel • Expand Use of the Internet mallow greater access to water-rotated data and information,including timely information on specific program actions and decisions; • Use electronic news bulletins,voice mail messages,cad other tesbaalogics to barer communicate with Headquarters and Regional anployees of the national water Program; • Develop,is Cooperation whh slates,other agencies and the Interagency Task Force on Monitoring,a national water quality data base reflecting basin-level data N. Priority Areas for Program Revisions This Agenda includes three priority areas for program rVishona to achieve the goals of protecting human health and the rnviromorffi. A. PrWed PahUC Hmlu by F•.,•rdrrg that Drinking Water is Safi The Ad mansTMatlna has co rlinucd to work with Conguss od a package of reforms to the Safes Drinking Water Ad to theme on the greatest risks,strcamhu cumbersome regulations,reduce costs, stimulate pollution prevention,and belts protect public health through fording to help communities upgrade their drinking water facilities. OW will continue to support theses principles in legislative debates and will implement then ad,,MustraLve[y to the extent possible poling reauthorization. These principles are,emsistent with the results of a comprehensive reassessment oftho Office of Wands drinking water and ground water pruVmns. In term,that rev',ow has led to a proposed redirection of drinking water activities to Casure that EPA invests its limited msc urns in areas that wit[yield the greatest health benefits(risk reduction)and assists State,Tribal and local agencies to do the same. Spaific actions to implement these principles include: • Imegrate Regional and State program activities into priorities identified in the reassessment pmcrss: • Craninuc discussions with stakeholders(water arpplimt,States,Tribes,public health and envuwmhvdal oegeniratious)while implementing the four primary objectives iereladed is EPMa 'Drinking Water Program Redirection Proposal',issued for commant on November 30, 1995. Tho four primary objectives arc Sound science and adequate data; -Riskbascd priorities for setting highyuality st ndans; Strong flexible partnerships with States,Tribes and local governments in implamcn at on;and -Community baacd,a fcctivo soµrcc wear protection; • Impl—voluntary eHoris to achieve greater public health prototon results,such as the Parmerehip for Safe Drinking Water thin mounnages public water syat®s to optimize removal ofwaterbors, pathogens from their facititics. This year we need to develop new partnerships for source water prma tiun that will prumWc wale udlitici efforts to protect the aourccs of their drinking water supplies,e.g.,rivers,streams,reservoirs and ground watma 6 01/26/96 15:21 Rr5 RE9aRCE9 INC 008 Y • Assist States and Tribes in cowdinating ambicrit and complim oc roonitoring to support source water asscasment and protection; ' Assist States and Tnbw"ring small systems'capacity througb such approaches as technical assistance and financing coordination. B. Pfdws the Emlronmmt by/rrTr byg We Warhr Flow Controls Water quality inventories haw idmtiflcd wet woad w flows(including agricultural ru toff,c®rbinod sewer oywflows, urban storm water,and sanitary sewn overflown)as the largest remaining threat to water quality. The Admmistratioo's Cleats Water Initiative focuses on reducing this threat to water quality,on reducing costs, and on providing States and local governments with greater fiendbiliry to solw wet weather problems. Consistent with those principles,the National Water Program will take timer specific actions: • Work with the urban wrl-weadtw advisory group,to: -address policy and tw.hnital issues related to urban wet we lbw—urban rtmol i storanvatcr and sanitary sewer overflow(SSO),and the Combined Se:wa Overflow(CSO)Policy implarncmation, etteaMice monitoring regduad in the existing smrm water program and cone idaw aerating State reporting roqum3nmts,coordinate with Mated CZM and 319 programs on a watershed bears,and -identify,and take appropriate steps to reduce the slating burden of the Phase I Storm water Program, consider changes to existing monitoring and permitting requirements,and continue cimenining ways to streamline slannwatcr Phase 11 program; • Ensure that all NPDES pemdts required for municipal separate storm sewer sy3tons(saving over 100,000 people)are issued in FY 1996/19,97 and clearly identify wet wathw controls; • improve the cf1belivmess of the Section 319 wnpoim sourer program by ismring new tuitional guidanm, inaugurating a new round of more effectiw StatoTribe programs focused on priority warcrsheds and envirmmnattal results,and eliminating the competitive grams upplieation process; • Confined animal feeding operations are ran important source of water pollution both lolly and downstream in some places. We will completo Suidanoc concerning 1row to address these sources; • Use pollution prevention, inc ntiw-based volunteer efforts writ outreach to address those traditionally not regulated eon-point souroca that arc contributing to water quality problems. C En mge Comprehensive Welands Mamgrmrcnt Usbrg Piac BasedApFro ch s The National Water Program is implemrnti%the Prcsident's 40-poim plan to cahancc wetlaMe protection, make walands regulation more fair and flexible,and move toward achieving the goal of no overall out loss of wetlands. We have wotkcd long and hard in sicarnlinig the permits process,reep®diog to mnam,of smwm lattaownws and fames,improving couperatlon with the regulated community in general,and w pending the role of States,Tribes and local govcmmaas in protecting wedands. In cooperation with odrw rogu4staa,we haw made gnat progress in reducing duplication and increasing consistency uncia the Clam Water omit Food Security Acts(Swsmpbusrcr), in si nplifyn'g wctlannds identification,proridirgllouibilily to parrot apphcn t increasing overall program efficiwoy,and providing information to hmdowners and to the Sweral public. 7 01/26/96 15:22 13t5 RESOURCES INC 009 To further advance implrmeutation of the President's August 1993 Wetlands Plan and the EPA Wctlaru% Strategic Plan,the National Water Program will: • Build the capacity of States,Tribes and local govcnvnents to perfmm wetlands preservation, restoration and management by: -Encouraging and supporting the developmart and hnplcrtumatim of State/rrihal Wetlands Conservation Plans(SWCPs)through workshops,grants and technical essistatke an that by the year 20M at least 25 Stmes will have adopted SWCPs with rtnrchanisms for wetlands assessment,sbutegic geographic prioritiwtion of ac"lics,rrsourwbasod monitoring and reporting,local planing and compliance; -Enonursging assuvitlton of regulatory authority,or alternative mechanienn that rely on StAmTribal decision making such m Statewide gweral permita and streamlined cortiEcatioms, -Developing truing oa how watershed nwragensm Plane can comply with and better utilize Section 404.cnsuri ig integration of programmatic and aeavitlR-based general pennies,mitigation bankng and abbreviated general pemtits; • Work with other Federal and State agencies to expedite timlopmcm,field testing of procedures to improve wetlands assessment techniques,and increase the use of such procedures to wsure that regulatory decisions rented actual wetlands functions and values at the proposed project sites; • Aggressively imptcment wetlands mitigation banking; • Provide information to the public and support landowners intcrcnod in voluntary wetlands stewardship. M. Cban&g How We Get the Job Done- New Administrative and Management Tools We must continue to carry out the basic mandates of our enabling legislation. We also must lewn to rely oa nor partners(the States,Tribes,and those we regulate)to implemwd the National Water Program. However, in implerrerrtirg our mission through partnerships,water programs must strike the right balance between flexibility and accountability. A_ Building on the 1996 Management!Agreements, Use New Administrative and No daml Mechanisms ro limProve Program Delivery The States we our eo- etc rs and am responsible for frmrfing nuny programs today. We must continue to build capacity where it is needed. We also need to mruppim the States that have capacity and work with than to ono Our oombi ted nesoumea most elfecb sly. Most of the States have long temn strategic plans either completed or in devdopurnt. Many of these pleas have developed statewide priorities. Many Stains know what their worst remaining eaviroamrntal pmbl= ere,they have thought through the best ways to solve those problens,and they know how to most effectively use Federal finds. Through the new systems we am piloting in 1996,the National Environmental Pcrfiormmcc Partnership System(NEPPS)and Performance Partnership Grants Performance Pmtourship Gmnts will require authority fran Congress.(PPGs),vw will provide the States with the added ficxibility they need to pnnduce the rnvirounrental results we all seek. 8 01/rb96 15:22 ENS RESO.RCES INC 010 The Agenda will guide development of the FY 1997 Managmrcnt Agrcm=ts so that they can serve as Regional Program Guidance when the RcIponv negotiate FY 1997 pmgranmiatic agreements m NEPPS agroemeats With States,Tnbo-EPA Agreanents(rEAs),and work plans with States and Tribes for categorical and Peifomancc Partnership Grants(PPGs). We will anocuragc the use of PPGs by Stales and Tribes to cmnbine funds from two or nacre of 16 eligible grard progruns. PPGs shmld allow States and Tribes tame flexibility to address their meet pressing eavirmnental probltans,implereent multi-media solutions within a watershed,and improve rmiromoeatal performance. PPGs should also provide admeregbauve savings and strengthen parfiembips bawxa EPA and the States or Trim. When nezotiadng PPGs,the Regions must ensum that the core program requinmtents which grants are recent to support ore being met. To ensure tow all have the same vision for our programs,National Water Prograrn Directors and I will visit esch Region in 1996 to discuss the Agenda,its relationsirip to Mmiagemat Agrmnents and other administrative and managuneot tools,Regional experia cc in implementing the Agenda,and development of the FY 1997 Maoagemcat Agrornrents. We will ose this ummumty to hear from the States end Tribes as wen. As a result of these visits we will develop a mnbral understanding of what cmrstinaes a good basic water program,and the quality of State/rnbo performance in implementing water programs that would qualify for furdw reductions in oversight. This W R assure the States and Tribes of consistency across the nation. We will also develop policy to help define when and how the National Program Managers may need to ba involved in discussions of NEPPS State-Regional agreements,and TEAS, The goal is to develop a xeamless tmplartcntation of national,regional,and State water progrann s with feedback mochenisms in every direction. To be more effective we will: • Use the Management Agreement process and our growing experience with environmental indicators to help us prepare to plan,measure achicvematts(outputs,outcome and service levels)of each program,and link our budget to those achicvanents under the Govemmvrt Petforruadee&Results Act(GPRA)in FY 1999; • Revise Region-Office of Water Maoageamad Agrocameits between the Assistant Administrator and Rtgitmal Administrators in 1996 for FY 1997 to provide greater flexibility but retain accountability for gang pt'o6r✓ra work done; • Use the National Water Program priority enviromnental indicators and milestones to measure progress toward our national erivironmeatal goals along with annual wrrm,itrriwts and programmatio activity measures in all Management Agreements; • Prvnwte delegation of operating programs to Starts whenever possible; • Use simple,strtaml'in d,standard(mostly electrenio)rnetbods for reporting under the Management Agreernads; • Regions will develop strong multi-media Environmental Performance Partnership Agreemannts and Tribal-EPA Agtenmeats to enable States and Tribes to focus attention on nationA State or Tribal, and Regional priorities; • Organize,with States,an EPA-State Operating Cotomince to provide greater overall coordination. 9 V♦ COST. SJGJ GV7 RCOLIJ'4.00 IIY. VJll A lmpfove Work with rheAmerican Indian Environmental 002ce(AIEO) Y The Office of Water and all EPA media pmgrzms will remain directly involved with Tribal govemne is beeausc Ue environmmtai managomem capabilhim of most Tribe are still in the early stages of development. Regional water programs will assist Tubes in developing comprehpaivc water quality programs. Symboli*g our involvement,Regional orgat&atima responsible for Tribal liaison will sign die IM Management Ageeenents(MAs). Further,the goals of AIEO in National Water Program activities as well as AIEO related oommitm u and moaners will appear in tier MAs. Spocimcamy,the Natioml Water Program will: • Assist AIEO in its work with Tribes to develop Tribal-EPA Environmental Agcecoats that doscriU a Tribes cr virmme tai problems,the Tribe's long-term vision for its cnwrommem and the near-term steps that EPA and the Tribe will take to address priority problems; ` Work with Tribes to: -increase water quality monitoring in Tribal watersheds; -atrmgthm Tribal wotwshed rmrugeme nt programs; -increase the oumbor of Tribes that have the pmtcdim of federally-approved water quality standards for their waters; eontime,resolving NPDES permit iuues oa Federal Indian reservations; -with other Federal partners, etnsurc that Tribal public water systems provide safe drinking water, • Involve all Assistant Admimstrators and Pi Tonal Administrators in the development ofthe AIEO agenda and the dcoisiox on Indian onvironmenal issues in FY 1"7; ` Assurc AIEO ability to provide ema-media coordination with liadquancrs and Regions to build Tribal capacity;and ` Support the Tribal Operations Committer. 10 v chapter 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 INTRODUCTION The 1994-95 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County's(Districts) Source Control Annual Report provides the following: • Information about the industrial source control program for the 1994-95 fiscal year(July 1, 1994-June 30, 1995) as required by the Districts' National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES)permit issued by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board,Santa Ana Region (CRWQCB) and the Environmental Protection Agency(EPA);and • Information on howthe Districts'source control program is administered;howwell industrial permittees achieve compliance at the source; what effect their discharge has had on the Districts'influent,effluent,and biosolids;what labor,equipment,and capital resources were used for industrial source control during the 1994-95 fiscal year,and to document how well the program is achieving its goals. During the 1994-95 fiscal year,the Districts'ocean wastewater discharge was in complete compliance with all the NPDES permit limits for all constituents with the lone exception when the Districts exceeded the toxicity limit in March 1995. More detailed information can be obtained in Chapter 4. Long-term trends of potentially toxic pollutants,such as heavy metals,continue to show a steady decline (Figure 1.1). 2500 500 450 2000 —Total Heavy Metals —Flow 400 350 b 1500 300 M I d 250 G a 1000 200 G y 150 500 100 50 0 0 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 Figure 1.1 Average Effluent Total Heavy Metals and Flows for Nineteen Fiscal Years. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California. 1.1 v The Districts'source control program,which is the cornerstone of the Districts'overall environmental approach to wastewater management has the following goals: • To ensure that the quality of water discharged to the ocean is in compliance with the NPDES permit requirements at all fimes. • To prevent the pass-through of toxic chemicals to the ocean from industrial sources. • To prevent interference with the Districts'operations and facilities. • To prevent municipal biosolids contamination and provide for beneficial reuse options. • To prevent exposure of Districts' employees to chemical hazards created by industrial discharges. • To prevent toxic contamination of the treated wastewater. • To enforce Federal pretreatment standards. • To ensure the equitable distribution of collection,treatment, and disposal costs to all users of the system. • To emphasize waste minimization and pollution prevention. The Districts'federally-approved source control program consists of: 1) an industrial wastewater discharge permit system to set industrial discharge limits and requirements; 2) a strong field-oriented sampling and inspection effort; 3) effective enforcement procedures to deter violations and bring dischargers back into compliance with requirements;and 4)a pollution prevention program that utilizes enforcement, permitting and outreach elements to improve industrial pollution prevention. Since fiscal 1976-77,the source control program has been successful in reducing the total mass of metals entering the Dishicts'system by 81% and reducing the metals discharged to the marine environment by 90%. Over this same time period,Influent cadmium has been reduced by 96%,chromium by 92%,copper by 74%, lead by 92%, nickel by 77%, and zinc by 81%. Compared to the 1993-94 fiscal year,there has been a 6% average increase of total daily influent metals entering the facilities and a 9%decrease in the effluent metals discharged to the ocean. During the past five years that the Districts have operated under the administratively extended 301(h)NPDES permit,the influent heavy metals have been reduced by 33% and the effluent by 39%. There were no incidents of pass-through or interference during fiscal year 1994-95. The reduction in lexica by the source control program has been so effective that for the last five years the influent heavy metals to the Districts'treatment plants have met NPDES effluent standards even without benefit of treatment. During the past five years,there has been a general downward trend in the discharge of toxic organics. Forth's year,the monthly mean concentrations of effluent toxic organic pollutants met all of the 36 Marine Water Chronic Criteria established by the EPA. The Districts' source control program not only has been effective In reducing the taxies discharged to the sewerage system,but has also been effective in protecting the collection,treatment,and disposal facilities from incidents of pass-through or interference, and in enabling the Districts to meet their NPDES ocean discharge limits. The quality of the Districts'influent,effluent,and biosolids are testimony to how well the program has progressed. Its future challenges will be to continue improving and meeting the program goals through the promotion of pollution prevention,education,communication,and industrial and regulatory joint understanding of sustainable growth and the consistent enforcement of the Districts' Wastewater Discharge Regulations (Ordinance). 1.2 1.2 BACKGROUND In the 1920's,a group of Orange County communities formed the Joint Outfall Sewer Organization (JOS)which constructed and operated a screening plant, a pumping plant and an 800-foot outfall. These facilities were expanded in the mid-1940's to include primary treatment at what is now the site of the Districts Reclamation Plant No. 1 in Fountain Valley. Due to the statutory constraints and financing limitations,the JOS could no longer meet the demands of the rapidly expanding county,and was subsequently dissolved and replaced by the County Sanitation Districts(Districts)in 1947-48. A successful bond issue election in 1949 helped to finance acquisition of the JOS's treatment and disposal facilities along with its property and a network of trunk sewers in each of eight of the original Districts. Operation of the Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach treatment plants by the Districts began in 1954. The present facilities consist of approximately 800 miles of subtrunk and trunk sewers,26 raw sewage pumping stations,two wastewater treatment plants with a combined capacity of 294 million gallons per day,and two ocean outfalls. Recognizing the need to control the quality and quantity of wastewaters discharged to the sewerage system, the Districts' Boards of Directors adopted the first Ordinance regulating the use of the sewerage system in February 1954. This Ordinance was subsequently revised and amended in February 1958,April 1970,July 1976,July 1983,September 1989,and February 7,1992. The 1970 revision formally established the Districts' Industrial Waste Division(which is now called the Source Control Division)to issue permits,set flow and quality limits, and monitor and inspect industrial discharges to the sewerage system. Substances monitored and regulated included:oil and grease(08G) of mineral and petroleum origin,organic materials,dissolved solids, suspended solids,phenolic compounds,radioactive wastes,combustible materials,and any other contaminants which had the potential to degrade wastewater treatment processes or cause problems in the sewerage facilities. In July 1976,the Ordinance was revised to include heavy metal limits. In July 1983,the Ordinance was further amended to include enforcement of the EPA's Federal categorical limits and to modify the Districts'local discharge limits for cadmium, copper,polychlorinated biphenyls(PCB), pesticides,and total toxic organics(TTOs). The Districts'pretreatment program was approved by the EPA in January 1984. In September 1989,the Ordinance was revised to streamline administrative and enforcement procedures,to incorporate EPA regulations adopted since 1983,and to clarify the intent of the program through added definitions and procedures. In February 1992,the Ordinance was again amended to revise defined terms, inifiate non-compliance sampling fees, and include language giving the Districts authority to levy administrative penalties in accordance with changes to state law enacted in January 1992. 1.3 PROGRAM SUMMARY As of June 30,1995,the Districts were administering 947 permits,of which 420 were Class I permits,245 were Class II permits, 228 were Class III permits, 37 were Wastehauler permits, and 17 were Special Purpose permits. This permit inventory represents a decrease of 3%from the 977 permits administered during the previous fiscal year. Of the 420 Class I users,266 were subject to federal Categorical Pretreatment Standards. Over $6,009,756 in sewer use charge payments and approximately$292,554 in non-compliance fees and penalties were invoiced through the industrial source control program. Based on the 2,328 industrial inspections performed during the fiscal year, 5,104 samples collected, and 29,952laboratory analyses performed, approximately 11% of the sampled Class I industries were determined to be in Significant Non-Compliance (SNC). Of the 266 categorical Class I users, 162 (61%) consistently achieved compliance,63(24%)inconsistently achieved compliance,and 27(10%)were determined to be SNC. There were 14(59%)categorical industries whose compliance status could not be determined. In 6 cases,there was no industrial discharge during the routine sample and inspection visit, and the remaining 8 were recent pernittees that were not sampled. Sampling is scheduled for these 14 companies beginning the first quarter of fiscal year 1995-96. 1.3 1.4 SOURCE CONTROL PROGRAM COMPLIANCE WITH NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT REQUIREMENTS This section is a summary of the pretreatment program requirements contained in the Districts' NPDES permit jointly issued by the CRWQCB and EPA. The NPDES permit requirements are in two sections:the Final Decision Fact Sheet and Order No.84-1 Waste Discharge Requirements. The requirements pertaining to the source control program for 1994-95 are listed below(n bold typeset) using the appropriate numeration found in the permit. Each requirement is followed by an overview of the activitiestactions which have resulted in the Districts'compliance with the permit requirements. A reference is also given where additional information can be found in this annual report. 1.4.1 Final Decision Fact Sheet III. DESCRIPTION OF APPLICATION SECTION F.Monitoring Program, Page 8 Assess the effectiveness of toxic control programs. The mass of heavy metals in the Districts'influent has dramatically decreased. The 1994-95 fiscal year's influent mass of heavy metals was 81%less than fiscal year 1976-77, 33% less than fiscal year 1990-91, and 6% more than last fiscal year. During the past five years, there has been a general downward trend in the discharge of toxic organics. In 1994-95,the monthly mean concentrations of effluent toxic organic pollutants met all of EPA's Marine Water Chronic Criteria.Chapter 5 graphically illustrates the year-by-year influent and effluent reductions of heavy metals and the accompanying text discusses the control of other toxics managed in the Districts'service area. IV. SECTION 301(h)REQUIREMENTS SECTION B. Final Decision,Page 10 2. The applicant shall revise its proposed schedule of activities to control nonindustrial toxics. The first four phases of the Non-Industrial Source Control (NISC) Program are complete. The NISC activities are discussed in the Districts'Annual Reports,Chapter 7 of Volume 2 for 1985-86, 1986-87 and 1987-88,and in the NISC final report of January 1987. The Districts have worked in cooperation with the County of Orange to establish permanent collection facilities for household hazardous waste. 1.4.2 Order No. 84-1 NPDES Waste Discharge Requirements SECTION C.Provisions,Page 9 1. Upon the effective date of this order, the discharger shall implement fully its pretreatment program. The discharger shall assure that industrial users of the treatment works subject to pretreatment standards,promulgated by EPA or established by the discharger,comply with those standards. The Districts'industrial pretreatment program was approved by the EPA in January 1984 and includes ongoing permitting,inspection,monitoring,and enforcement activities. The 1994-95 compliance status 1.4 for the Class I permittees is shown in the Monitoring and Compliance Status Report, presented in Appendix A of this report. 2. Adequacy of any pretreatment program shall be determined by conformance with the State Water Resources Control Board's (SWRCB) "Guidelines for Determining the Effectiveness of Local Source Control Programs" and EPA regulations governing pretreatment contained in 40 CFR 403. As acknowledged by the EPA and SWRCB during the Pretreatment Compliance Inspections(PCis) conducted in May 1987,June 1988,June 1989,September 1990,and June 1994;the Pretreatment Performance Evaluations(PPEs) conducted In July 1989 and April 1991;and the Audit of May 1986, the DWcW pretreatment program was found to be very effective in reducing the toxicants entering the Districts'fadlrties and was found to be in conformance with the guidelines and requirements set forth by SWCRB and EPA's regulations governing pretreatment programs contained in 40 CFR 403. 3. The discharger shall comply with the time schedule to achieve compliance with the PCB limits in Effluent Limit A.1.c. The Plan of Study shall provide a strategy for determining the location,quality,and quantity of PCB discharges to the wastewater collection system. The Districts expended over$400,000 between 1982-1985 in an effort to identify sources of PCB in the service area. The effort to systematically look for sources of PCB began with the collection and analysis of treatment plant influent and effluent samples. During the second quarter of 1903, a four-phase program to identify and control point sources of PCB began and was completed In late 1985 without locating any discernible sources of PCB. Phase I consisted of the initial gathering of PCB reference material. In Phase 11, this material was reviewed and summarized. During Phase III,inspection and sampling of industries were conducted. In Phase IV,trunkline wastewater and greaselsolids samples were collected and analyzed. During Phase V of the project, the June 1986 PCB Source Control Program Final Report was submitted. In Phase V, over 840 samples from the DstdcW sewer system were collected and analyzed for PCB. The results indicated that there were no discernable sources of PCB discharged to the Districts'system. The 1984 and 1985 Annual Reports contain a summary of the efforts made during the reporting periods of July 1983 through June 1984, and July 1984 through June 1985, respectively. In addition, the Districts' reports to the CRWQCB dated December 15, 1983,April 2, 1985, November 12, 1985,and March 26, 1986,give detailed results of the Districts'work. The major conclusion of the Phase V study was that outside laboratory results showed considerably less PCB than those reported by the Districts and that the results, in fact, showed the Districts'final effluent to be in consistent compliance with Effluent Limit A.1.c. Additional data have been reviewed since the Phase V study, and it has been concluded that the Districts' effluent has been in compliance with the limits and the previous Districts' results were incorrect.This explanation is presented in the 1987-88 Annual Report,Volume 2,Chapter 5,Section 5.7. During the last two fiscal years, PCB values in the influent and effluent were less than the analytical detection limit. S. In accordance with 40 CFR part 125.64(d),the discharger shall implement the approved non-industrial source control program. Since 1984,the Districts have spent$300,000 to develop and Implement the Non-Industrial Source Control Program. This has included the dissemination of Information to the Orange County public, participation In one-day events to collect household hazardous waste (roxic Round-Ups), and 1.5 1 sampling of nonindustrial shesto determine the impact on the Districts'system. Additionalinformation can be found In Chapter 7 of the 1985-86,1986-87,1987-88, 1988-89,and 1989-90 Source Control Annual Report and the January 1987 Non-Industrial Source Control Program Final Report. Permitted household hazardous waste collection facilities opened in 1990 in the cities of Anaheim,Huntington Beach,and San Juan Capistrano. 1.4.3 Standard Provisions and Reporting Requirements A. General Provisions, Page 15 16. The discharger shall ensure compliance with any existing or future pretreatment standard promulgated by EPA under Section 307 of the Clean Water Act or amendments thereto for any discharge to the municipal system. The ongoing quarterly Inspection, sampling, and monitoring program for each Class I Industry (Significant Industrial Users) ensures compliance with Federal, state, and local regulations. The compliance status of all industries subject to Federal Categorical Standards Is shown in the Monitoring and Compliance Status Report,presented in Appendix A of this report. 18. The discharger shall require each Industrial user to submit periodic notice (over intervals not to exceed nine months)of progress toward compliance with applicable toxic and pretreatment standards developed underthe Clean Water Act or amendments thereto. The discharger shall forward a copy of such notice to the Board and the Regional Administrator. As acknowledged and approved by the EPA,SWRCB,and the CRWQCB during the audits conducted in May 1986, July 1989 and April 1991; and the PCIs in 1987, 1988, 1989, 1990, and 1994, the Districts'permitting, monitoring,inspection,and enforcement efforts meet or exceed this requirement for assessing a users progress toward compliance. The Quarterly Monitoring and Compliance Status Reports on each Class I permittee are sent to the CRWQCB,SWRCB,and EPA. Those companies that are not making sufficient progress toward compliance are directed by a Probation Order to perform certain actions to bring the discharge into compliance. If the installation of a pretreatment system is required,the company enters into an Enforcement Compliance Schedule Agreement(ECSA)which requires specific schedules for installation of pretreatment equipment. If the company is not in compliance with the ECSA,it is subject to additional enforcement actions such as a permit suspension, permit revocation, administrative penalties, or civil actions such as injunctions, civil penalties, and criminal penalties. 1.4.4 Order No. 84-1 Monitoring and Reporting Program vll. Pretreatment Program Monitoring,Page 44 b. The discharger shall cause industrial users subject to Federal Categorical Standards to achieve compliance no laterthan the date specified in those requirements,or,in the case of a new industrial user, upon commencement of the discharge. The Districts have an ongoing commitment to meeting the provisions of this requirement, and all pretreatment requirements are rigorously enforced as discussed in Chapter 3 of this report. The Ordinance contains specific provisions for new dischargers which are more stringent than those required by 40 CFR 403. C. The discharger shall perform the pretreatment functions as required in 40 CFR Part 403 including, but not limited to: 1.6 �q (1) Implement the necessary legal authorities as provided in 40 CFR 403.8(f)(1); The legal authorities are contained in the Disticts'July 1983"Regulations For Use of District Sewerage Facilities" (Ordinance)which were approved by EPA in January 1984,and affirmed during the May 1986 audit. Revised Ordinances,"Wastewater Discharge Regulations",were adopted and became effective September 8, 1989,and February 7, 1992. The adopted Ordinances were sent to EPA on September 18.1989,and March 4, 1992. (2) Enforce the pretreatment requirements under 40 CFR 403.5 and 403.6. The requirements to enforce and implement National Pretreatment Standards for general prohibitions and specific industrial subcategories are contained in the Districts'Ordinance. Chapter 3 of this report describes the enforcement efforts for fiscal year 1994-95. (3) Implement the programmatic functions as provided in 40 CFR 403.8(f)(2). The required functions include the identification, quantification, permitting, and enforcement of the standards set forth in the Districts'Ordinance. Chapters 2 and 3 of this report describe the permitting and enforcement efforts for fiscal year 1994-95. (4) Provide the requisite funding and personnel to implement the pretreatment program as provided in 40 CFR 403.8(f)(3). The Source Control Program is funded by industrial permit fees,non-compliance sampling fees,and sewer use charges. The Source Control Division's operating expenditures, including laboratory analyses for 1994-95 were over$2.8 million. Chapter 6 of this report provides additional details. d. The discharger shall submit annually a report to EPA Region 9 and the State describing the dischargers pretreatment activities over the previous twelve months.This annual report is due on October 30 of each year and shall contain,but not be limited to,the following information: (1) A summary of analytical results from sampling of the constituents in the influent, effluent,and sludge as specified in Monitoring and Reporting Program No.84-1. The sampling summary is provided in Chapters 4, 5,and 9 and Appendix B of this report. (2) Discussion of upset, interference, or pass-through incidents, it any, at the POTW treatment plant which the discharger knows or suspects were caused by industrial users of the POTIN system. There were no plant upsets,interference, or pass-through incidents attributable to industrial users in 1994-5. (3) The cumulative number of industrial users that the discharger has notified regarding Baseline Monitoring Reports and the cumulative number of industrial user reports. The Districts have on file all data necessary to originate Class I Pennittee Baseline Monitoring Reports. As discussed with the EPA during the May 1986 industrial pretreatment program audit and the annual Pretreatment Compliance Inspection(PCQ,the Districts'database on each company met or exceeded the requirements for the information requested of dischargers for Baseline Monitoring Reports. Information on each Class I discharger is updated through the permit renewal process.The summary information is shown in the Monitoring and Compliance Status Report presented in Appendix A of this report. 1.7 14) An updated list of the Dischargers industrial users including their names and addresses. The list shall identify the industrial user subject to federal Categorical Standards by specifying which set(s) of standards are applicable. The updated list of industrial users is shown in the Monitoring and Compliance Status Report, (presented in Appendix A) of this report. The dischargershall characterize the compliance status of each industrial user by employing the following description: (A) In compliance with Baseline Monitoring Report requirements; (B) Consistently achieving compliance; (C) Inconsistently achieving compliance; (D) Significantly violated applicable pretreatment requirements as defined by 40 CFR 403.81 (E) On a compliance schedule to achieve compliance (include the date that final compliance is required); (F) Achieving compliance and not on a compliance schedule; (G) The discharger does not know the industrial user's compliance status. A report describing the compliance status of any industrial user characterized by the descriptions in items 4(C) through (G) above shall be submitted quarterly from the annual report date to EPA Region IX and the State. The report shall identify the specific compliance status of each such industrial user. The Quarterly Monitoring and Compliance Status Reports were submitted for fiscal year 1994- 95 on November 30, 1994, February 28, 1995, May 30, 1995, and August 30, 1995. The Quarterly Monitoring and Compliance Status Report and the Semiannual Compliance Status presented In Appendix A of this report define whether a company is consistently achieving compliance (CAC), Inconsistently achieving compliance (IAC) or is in significant noncompliance (SNC). During 1994-95, 281 of 402 sampled Class I permittees (or 70%) were CAC; 77 sampled Class I permittees (or 19%) were IAC; and 44 sampled Class I permittees (or 11%) were SNC. A compliance determination could not be made for 18 industries because 9 permittees were not discharging industrial waste at the times of inspection,and 9 were recently permitted facilities. (5) A summary of the inspection and sampling activities conducted by the discharger during the past year to gather information and data regarding industrial users. The summary shall include: (A) The names and addresses of the Industrial users subject to surveillance by the discharger and an explanation of whether they were inspected, sampled, or both and the frequency of these activities at each user; and (B) The conclusions and results fromthe inspection or sampling of each industrial user. 1.8 �y The Monitoring and Compliance Status Report (Appendix A of this report) includes the information requested in items(A) and (B)above. Class I permittees sample data (Appendix G of this report) show individual heavy metal, total toxic organic, cyanide, and other miscellaneous sample analyses. A further discussion of the Districts' 2,328 inspections conducted and 5,104 samples collected for fiscal year 199"5 is presented in Chapter 3 of this report. (6) Summary of the compliance/enforcement activities during the past year. The summary shall include the names and addresses of the industrial users affected by the following actions: (A) Warning letters or notices of violation regarding the industrial users'apparent noncompliance with federal Categorical Standards or local discharge limits.For each industrial user, identify whether the apparent violation concerned the federal Categorical Standards or local discharge limits; Appendix D, Outgoing Correspondence Log, lists the Notices of Violation that were sent in 1994-95. These notices state that the company was in non-compliance and must take corrective actions to immediately achieve compliance. A summary of non-compliance violations is presented in the Monitoring and Compliance Status Report(Appendix A). A listing by company of the non-compliance fees collected in 1994-95 is presented in Appendix E. (B) Administrative Orders regarding the industrial users noncompliance with federal Categorical Standards or local discharge limits. For each industrial user, identify whether the violation concerned the federal Categorical Standards or local discharge limits. Four of the Class I pennitiees were subject to probation Orders during fiscal year 1994-95 which required the companies to achieve compliance within a prescribed time. Enforcement details can be found in Chapter 3 of the report. (C) Civil actions regarding the industrial users' noncompliance with federal Categorical Standards or local discharge limits. For each industrial user, Identify whether the violation concerned the federal Categorical Standards or local discharge limits. There were no civil actions taken during fiscal year 1994-95. (D) Criminal actions regarding the industrial users' noncompliance with federal Categorical Standards or local discharge limits. For each industrial user, identify whether the violation concerned the federal Categorical Standards or local discharge limits. No criminal action suits were filed in 1994-95. (E) Assessment of monetary penalties. For each industrial user, identify the amount of the penalties; One hundred and four companies were invoiced for a total of$292,554 in non-compliance fees and penalties. The company names and specific dollar amounts are shown in Appendix E of the report. 1.9 a (F) Restriction of flow to the POTW;or There were no mandated restrictions of industrial flows from specific dischargers during 1994- 95. (G) Disconnection from discharge to the POTW. There were no physical disconnections from the sewer in 1994-95. (7) A description of any significant changes in operating the pretreatment program which differfrom the information in the discharger's Approved POTW Pretreatment Program including, but not limited to changes concerning: the program's administrative structure; local industrial discharge limits; monitoring program or monitoring frequencies; legal authority or enforcement policy; funding mechanisms; resource requirements; or staffing levels. For fiscal year 1994-95,there were no significant changes in operating the pretreatment program. In past years,the primary changes to the pretreatment program were in the form of revisions to the Wastewater Discharge Regulations. During the 1991-92 fiscal year, there were nonsubstantial changes in the form of revisions to defined terms,non-compliance sampling fees,and incorporation of language giving the Districts authority to levy administrative penalties in accordance with state law. The amended Regulations were authorized by the Boards of Directors in February 1992. (8) A summary of the annual pretreatment budget, including the cost of pretreatment program functions and equipment purchases. For fiscal year 1994-95,the operating expenses for the source control program were approximately $2,836,003. Additional information on the source control budget,costs,and purchases are shown in Chapter 6 of this report. (9) A summary of public participation activities to involve and inform the public. Therewere over 67 public participation events held with various groups in this fiscal year. A complete summary of the public participation activities and communication with other public agencies is shown in Chapter 7 of the report. (10) Other miscellaneous pretreatment developments, including treatment facilities changes, changes in sludge disposal methods, receiving water quality, data management,and concerns not described elsewhere in the report. Additional information on operational modifications and compliance with NPDES permit conditions and ocean monitoring requirements is given in Chapters 4 and 5 of this report. 1.10 U CELLULAR TELEPHONE POLICY AND PROCEDURE County Sanitation Districts of Orange County A. PURPOSE To establish the criteria for deployment of Districts-provided cellular telephone equipment to employees and the procedures regulating the use of same. B. SCOPE All regular employees. C. POLICY 1. Basic Principles. The Districts will provide all employees with the appropriate communication tools to enable them to effectively perform their job. The basic telephone is the most common tool. When portable means of communication are required, the Districts' 2-way radio system is a valuable resource. When necessary, a cellular telephone and appropriate peripheral equipment may be necessary for employees with a documented need. In every instance where the Districts provide the communication tool, it is the employee's responsibility to ensure that the device is used for appropriate Districts business. 2. Justification. The basic criteria which must be met to justify need for a cellular telephone must fall in one or more of the following three categories: (a) Safety / Emergency Response. The employee's duties involve monitoring, response, or other activities which are essential to the safe operation of the Districts' facilities, making mobile communication with a cellular telephone necessary. (b) On-Call. The employee's job assignment involves being on-call, either on a formal assignment basis or as an inherent level of responsibility based on the responsibilities of the position. (c) Field Work. The employee's normal work duties involve the need to communicate in the field with non-Districts' employees. Typically this will involve working in locations where no public telephone is reasonably available or practical. A memo of justification from the requesting employee must be attached to the Purchase Requisition when the request is submitted to the employee's supervisor for approval. The signature of each level of supervision required by the Purchase Requisition process means that the signer concurs with the justification. All request for cellular telephones require a Department Head approval. 3. If the employee cannot adequately justify the expenditure of Districts funds to provide the employee with a cellular telephone, the employee is free to purchase his/her own telephone. If the employee uses his/her own cellular telephone for Districts business, the employee may then submit a photocopy of their bill for reimbursement. Charges will be reimbursed for air time plus the cost of each call made for legitimate Districts business. The employee's supervisor must approve these requests and the calls documented. 4. All cellular telephone bills will be subject to an initial screening for reasonable limits by the Accounting Division. In addition to the employee's review as mentioned in item 5 (a. iii) below, all bills must be reviewed by the employee's supervisor. 5. Each employee with a Districts-provided cellular telephone must agree to the following procedures regarding use and handling: a. The Accounting Division will send a copy of the telephone bill to each individual cellular telephone user each month. (i) Each employee is responsible to review the bill in a timely manner and note any personal calls made. A check must be made payable to the Districts for the total of these calls and returned with the bill to the Accounting Division. (ii) Each employee is responsible to review the bill for calls not made. Any calls which cannot be accounted for as having been made for either Districts business or personal use should be noted. It is the employee's responsibility to contact the cellular telephone service provider listed on the bill to have the charges reversed and make arrangements to take remedial action to prevent further fraudulent calls. (iii) All bills must be submitted to the employee's supervisor for review. (iv) If the employee uses the cellular telephone during out-of- town travel on Districts business, personal calls made with a Districts cellular telephone will be allowed only up to the daily dollar limit as defined in the Travel and Meeting Authorization Form. b. Fraudulent calls are often made on cellular telephones without the ti knowledge of the cellular telephone user. A Fraud Protection Feature must be encoded into each cellular telephone to prevent this. However, to work, the cellular telephone user must utilize the proper keystrokes on the cellular telephone before and after cellular telephone use. Training on the use of these keystrokes is given at the time the cellular telephone is programmed and delivered to the user. The employee is responsible to use proper care to follow the procedures given at the time the telephone is obtained to prevent cellular telephone fraud. C. The Districts-provided cellular telephone may not be loaned or assigned to a non-employee. d. Employees with Districts-provided cellular telephones are responsible for maintaining adequate physical protection of the cellular telephone. This protection includes, but is not limited to, never leaving cellular telephones unattended in public areas and never leaving cellular telephones in plain sight, either in hotel rooms or automobiles. e. Employees with Districts-provided cellular telephones must report any problems with their telephones promptly. Contact the Hardware Support Division of the Information Technology Department. ... (fiang"Osiltual Itriarb United StatesPROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 104'h CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION of Americaiu WASHINGTON, TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1"5 House of Representatives RECOGNITION OF AMSA ON THE OCCASION OF ITS 25TH ANNIVERSARY HON. BUD SHUSTER treatment works, they formed AMSA. OF PENNSYLVANIA In the quarter century that followed, the IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES association grew and its interests diversified. Tuesday, November 7, 1995 Today, AMSA is a dynamic national organi- Mr. SHUSTER. Mr. Speaker, on behalf zation involved in all facets of water quality of myself and JIM OBERSTAR, the ranking protection and representing over 160 muni- Democrat of the Transportation and Infras- cipalities. Viewed as a key stakeholder in tructure Committee, I wish to take this op- both the legislative and regulatory arenas, portunity to congratulate the Association of AMSA has built credible and collaborative Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies (AMSA) relationships with Members of Congress, on the occasion of its 25th anniversary. Presidential administrations and the Environ- AMSA is the only national trade association mental Protection Agency. Recent years exclusively representing the unique interests have reflected heightened involvement for of our country's largest wastewater treat- the association in a broadening array of en- ment agencies. As the first line of defense vironmental laws and regulations, including in our national campaign against water pol- the gamut of ecosystem issues encom- lution, AMSA members are responsible for passed under the umbrella of watershed the high degree of water quality that we now management, among them, nonpoint source enjoy in the United States. pollution control and the protection of air The emergence of AMSA as a national- quality and endangered species. As chair- ly recognized leader in environmental policy man of the Transportation and Infrastructure and a sought-after technical resource on Committee, I am in a good position to ob- water quality and ecosystem protection is- serve that AMSA has met the goal of its sues has paralleled the maturation of the Na- founders and continues to pursue every op- tion's most successful environmental portunity to develop and implement scien- law—the Clean Water Act. AMSA was es- tifically based, technically sound and tablished in 1970 by representatives of 22 cost-effective environmental programs. municipal sewage agencies to secure Fed- AMSA's active membership, prominence eral funding for municipal wastewater treat- as a nationally recognized leader in environ- ment and serve as a forum to discuss mental policy, and it close working relation- emerging national interest in improving the ship with Congress and EPA, will quality of the Nation's waters. Based upon undoubtedly allow it to help shape the the shared goal of effectively representing course of environmental protection into the the interests and priorities of publicly owned next century. M AW% 14:36:22 -> 714962M356 Donald McIntyre Page H01 FEB-07-96 WED 13:36 P. 01 � CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION of SANITATION AGENCIES 925 L Sarm4 Suttc 1400 Baca .W,CA 95614 TEL(01G)44G-03M-FAX(91G)448 4806 corm"° DATE: February 7, 1996 TO: CASA Member Agencies PROM: Mike Dillon, Executive Director Rpberta Larson, Director of Regulatory Affairs Eric Sapirstein, Federal Legislative Advocate SUBJECT: CONSTITUTION REVISION COMMISSION AND PRIVATIZATION 1. CONSTITUTION REVISION COMMISSION HOME RULE CHARTER PROPOSAL GENERATES LENGTHY DEBATE In a surprising move last week, Assembly Speaker Curt Pringle, removed four of former Democratic Speaker Willie Brown's appointments to the Constitution Revision Commission, and named four new replacements. The new appointees are Dr. Larry Arnn, president of the Claremont Institute and co-chair of the California Civil Rights Initiative campaign; Dr. Steven Frat4:s, second Vice President of the Girl Scouts of San Diego and Imperial Counties; Dr. Edward Erler, professor of political science at CSU, San Bernardino and member of the California Advisory Commission on Civil Rights, and Richard Rider, retired stockbroker, financial planner and 1994 Libertarian candidate for Governor. The four new appointees replace former Commissioners Elizabeth Cabtaser, Kamala Harris, Assemblyman Phil Isenberg, and Dr_ Chui Tsang. The new appointees got to flex their muscles during a two-day meeting on Monday and Tuesday, when the California Constitution Revision Commission debated the merits of the Home Rule Community Charter proposal, which would require local governments in each county to draft a countywide charter for submittal to the voters. The Commission had hoped to finalize its recommendations by late Tuesday afternoon, but the preliminary vote to determine if the controversial charter proposal was even "on the right track" was 10 to 7, with three of the four newly-appointed Commissioners joining Senator Bill Leonard, Legislative Analyst Liz Hill, Dr. Akan Heslop and Andy Baron in voting against the charter component. Debate centered on many of the issues raised by the special district associations, in a joint letter to the Commission, regarding its "cookie cutter" approach. Some Commissioners questioned the arbitrary nature of the mandate to reduce the number of governmental units by 10 percent, suggesting that the plan should take into account the relative number of local government units that already exist New appointee Stev4v Frates stressed that the focus should be on improved efficiency, not arbitrary numeric reductions in agencies. Others expressed concern that the latest M7107196 14:37:03 -> 714962O356 Donald McIntyre Page 1102 FEB-07-96 WED 13:36 P. 02 version of the local charter proposal constitutes a significant unfunded state mandate. The Commission also debated the composition of the proposed county charter Commissions (CCCs), which are heavily weighted toward cities and counties at the expense of schools and special districts. Given the controversy surrounding the local charter concept and the sheer magnitude of its unresolved issues, the Commission has decided to convene another mating on February 22 to further refine its recommendations. Other issues still pending are education finance, budget reserve requirements and legislative fundraising while in session. In the meantime, CSA and the other special district organizations will continue to work with Commissioners on revising the charter concept n. REASON FOUNDATION RELEASES REPORT ON PRIVATIZATION The Reason Foundation, a private research group based in Los Angeles, has released a report on privatizing the water industry. The report, titled 'Restructuring Amrrica s Water Industry: Comparing Investor-Owned and Government Water Systems" has been sharply criticized within the water industry, including the Association of California Water Agencies (ACWA). The report concludes that privately-owned companies are far more efficient in supplying water than are publicly-owned agencies. In conducting their research, the authors reportedly gathered information on wastewater treatment operations as well. This information is not mentioned in the report, but could form the basis for a similar report in the future. Given the discussion regarding privatization at last month's CASA meeting and the importance of the issue, we wanted to share the conclusions of the Reason Foundation report with you. The report compares the operations of five publicly-owned water supply ageucies in Contra Costa and Alameda counties with three investor-owned water suppliers to determine the benefits of restructuring the industry to increase efficiency. The authors suggest that inefficiencies in providing water supply and wastewater treatment services arise from the "balkanization" of authority in providing these services. The authors state that this was a key motivating factor in the restructuring of the British water system; in fad, the report begins with the premise that England and France, which have privatized water supply service to a large degree have benelitted dramatically in terms of both operating efficiency and water quality. The report concedes, however, that no comprehensive study comparing compliance with water quality standards between public and private water purveyors in California has been conducted. The authors recommend that public involvement in water supply be reconsidered, "since investor-owned companies can provide this same function at the same cost without subsidies or tax-exemptions." However, in reaching this conclusion, the report fails to note that most of the private companies are cagaged in distribution only, while the public agencies are responsible for treatment and storage as well; in other words, the report compares apples and oranges. I AGENDA BOARDS OF DIRECTORS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 28, 1996 - 7:30 P.M. In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the Districts' Administrative Offices not less I 1 than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Boards for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an emergency item or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the j attention of the Districts subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a I ! supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. I i € (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll call (3) Appointment of Chair pro tem, if necessary (4) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders) (5) Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Boards on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot have action taken by the Boards of Directors except as authorized by Section 54954.2(b). 02/28/96 (6) The Joint Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. (a) Report of Joint Chair, consideration of Resolutions or commendations, presentations and awards (b) Report of General Manager (c) Report of General Counsel (7) EACH DISTRICT If no corrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair: District 1 - January 24, 1996 regular, January 27, 1996 adjourned, and February 14, 1996 adjourned District 2 - January 24, 1996 regular, January 27, 1996 adjourned, and February 14, 1996 adjourned District 3 - January 24, 1996 regular, January 27, 1996 adjourned, and February 14, 1996 adjourned District 5 - January 24, 1996 regular, January 27, 1996 adjourned, and February 14, 1996 adjourned District 6 - January 24, 1996 regular, January 27, 1996 adjourned, and February 14, 1996 adjourned District 7 - January 24, 1996 regular, January 27, 1996 adjourned, and February 14, 1996 adjourned District 11 - January 24, 1996 regular, and February 14, 1996 adjourned District 13 - January 24, 1996 regular, January 27, 1996 adjourned, and February 14, 1996 adjourned District 14 - January 24, 1996 regular, January 27, 1996 adjourned, and February 14, 1996 adjourned -2- 02/28/96 (8) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District.) 01/24/96 01/30/96 02/07/96 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $ 330,891.89 $ 1,984.69 $1,097,537.60 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 716,314.33 100.00 377,866.63 Joint Working Capital Fund - 508,946.57 183,218.02 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 3,511.49 8,582.81 63,272.44 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 92.60 443.50 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 1,305.61 5,033.49 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 500,455.26 423,815.28 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 477.07 12,802.61 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 69.20 252.84 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 312,689.59 62,188.89 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 10,463.03 195,154.05 DISTRICT NO. 13 - 3.40 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 14 - 764.81 17.05 DISTRICTS NOS. 3 & 11 JOINT - 875.00 0.00 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 678.04 172,537.30 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 213.30 2,258.68 DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 15.98 6,341.96 $2,387,767.17 11g.EL67.50 12.602.740.34 -3- 02/28/96 (9) CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 9(a) THROUGH 9(d) i All matters placed on the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent j i calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. i I i Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. I The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of Resolution No. 96-17, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Purchase of Muriatic Acid, Specification No. C-037, to Pressure Vessel Service, Inc., for the delivered price of$.46 per gallon, plus sales tax, for a one-year period beginning April 10, 1996, with provision for four one-year extensions (Estimated annual cost $59,800.00 plus sales tax). (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 96-18, approving Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Clifford A. Forkert Civil Engineers for Surveying Services for Various Collection System and Treatment Plant Projects, Specification No. P-150, providing for a name change to Forkert Engineering & Surveying, Inc. DISTRICT 2 (c) Consideration of Resolution No. 96-22-2, approving Agreement with the Orange County Flood Control District, providing for reimbursement of costs to the Flood Control District re installation of flood protection on South River Trunk as part of the Santa Ana River Flood Improvements, in an amount not to exceed $50,000.00 -4- [ITEM (9) CONTINUED ON PAGE 5] 02/28/96 (9) DISTRICT 5 - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (d) Consideration of motion to'receive and file Summons & Complaint for - Inverse Condemnation, Charles G. Reynolds, at al., vs. City of Newport Beach, at al., Superior Court Case No. 758245, for alleged damages to homes due to surface run off because of a ruptured sewer line adjacent to plaintiffs' homes, and authorize District's General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the District. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (10) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any -5- 02/28/96 NON-CONSENT CALENDAR (11) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Committee Minutes: (1) Receive and file draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on January 24, 1996. (2) Receive and file draft Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on February 1, 1996. (3) Receive and file draft Operations, Maintenance, and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on February 7, 1996. (4) Receive and file draft Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on February 14, 1996. (7) Receive and file draft Executive Committee Minutes for the meeting held on February 21, 1996. (b) Consideration of the following actions recommended by said committees: • Verbal Report from Chair of Planning, Design and Construction Committee re: February 1, 1996 Meeting. (1) PDC95-34 Consideration of the following actions relative to Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-35-3; Process Area Fire Protection, Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-5; Process Area Fire Protection, Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-46; and, Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-55: (a) Verbal report of Director of Engineering (b) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for said project, changing the date for receipt of bids from January 9, 1996 to January 16, 1996, clarifying contractor's license requirements, and making miscellaneous technical clarifications. (c) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications for said project, making miscellaneous technical clarifications. [ITEM (11)(b) CONTINUED ON PAGE 7] 02/28/96 (11) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 6) (b) (1) (d) Consideration of Resolution No. 96-19, receiving and filing - bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-35-3; Process Area Fire Protection, Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-5; Process Area Fire Protection, Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. P246; and, Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2, Jab No. P2-55, to Sverdrup Civil, Inc., in the total corrected amount of$13,196,500.00. • Verbal Report from Chair of Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee re: February 7, 1996 Meeting. (2) Consideration of the following motions relative to a Heavy Duty Vehicle Demonstration Project with South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD): (a) OMTS95-041 a Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to enter into an agreement with SCAQMD re said project, at no cost to the Districts, in form approved by General Counsel. (b) OMTS95-041 b Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding with SCAQMD re said project, in form approved by General Counsel. • Verbal Report from Chair of Finance, Administrative and Human Resources Committee re: February 14, 1996 Meeting. (3) FAHR96-04 Consideration of Resolution No. 96-20, amending Resolution No. 95-105, extending benefit coverage for regular employees working a reduced work week. (4) FAHR96-10 Consideration of motion approving renewal of Boiler & Machinery Insurance for a one-year period effective March 1, 1996 to March 1, 1997, with American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance (Kemper Insurance Group), in an amount not to exceed $79,698.00. (5) FAHR96-14 Consideration of motion to receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of December 1995. [ITEM (11)(b) CONTINUED ON PAGE 8] -7- 02/28/96 (11) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 7) (6) FAHR96-15 Consideration of motion to receive and file Mid-Year Financial and Operations Report dated December 31, 1995 (Presentation by Controller). (7) FAHR96-17 Consideration of motion to approve 1996-97 Budget Assumptions for use in preparation of Districts' 1996-97 Budget (Presentation by Controller). • Verbal Report from Chair of Executive Committee re: February 21, 1996 Meeting. (12) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Report dated February 22, 1996, requesting staff be authorized to place a moratorium on the determination and collection of excess capacity charges until such time that a study for capital charges is completed and a method to collect capital charges is adopted by the Boards of Directors, and to guarantee the capital charge for industrial users, which connect to the system or increase their discharge prior to completion of the study, will be no higher than those specified in said Staff Report. Said moratorium will not apply to dischargers which enter into separate discharge agreements with the Districts. (13) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Update concerning developments related to the County's Commingled Investment Pool. (b) FAHR96-09 Consideration of motion to receive and file staff report dated February 5, 1996 re the Joint Agreement of the County of Orange, the Official Investment Pool Participants' Committee, and Each Option A Pool; and consideration of Resolution No. 96-21, approving said agreement. (14) ALL DISTRICTS Update re proposed acquisition of County Landfill System -8- 02/28/96 (15) ALL DISTRICTS ..........................._......................_..................................................................................._...._............._......._........ i CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on I this agenda as a regular meeting of the Boards,the Chair may convene the I I Boards in closed session to consider matters of pending real estate negotiations, pending or potential litigation,or personnel matters, pursuant to i iGovernment Code Sections 54956.8, 54956.9,54957 or 54957.6, as noted. Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of I I pending or potential litigation; (c) employment actions or negotiations with { i employee representatives;or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Boards during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as final actions are taken by the Boards on any of these subjects,the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. (a) Convene in closed session, if necessary (b) (1) Confer with Special Counsel and General Counsel re status of litigation, Patterson v. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court Case Nos. 738179, 738622 and 741371 (Government Code Section 54956.9(a). (2) Confer with General Counsel re status of litigation, S. Serrantino v. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 737044 (Government Code Section 54956.9(a). (c) Reconvene in regular session (d) Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session (16) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (17) ALL DISTRICTS Matters which a Director would like staff to report on at a subsequent meeting (18) ALL DISTRICTS Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff report (19) DISTRICT 1 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any -9- 02/28/96 (20) DISTRICT 1 ' Consideration of motion to adjourn (21) DISTRICT Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (22) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn (23) DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (24) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn (25) DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specification for Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3, Contract No. 5-37-3, authorizing an addition of $232,610.00 to the contract with Wal-Con Construction Company, for six items of additional work, and granting a time extension of 60 calendar days for completion of said additional work. (26) DISTRICT 5 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (27) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn (28) DISTRICT 6 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (29) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn (30) DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (31) DISTRICT Consideration of motion to adjourn (32) DISTRICT 11 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (33) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn -10- 02/28/96 (34) DISTRICT 13 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (35) DISTRICT 13 Consideration of motion to adjourn (36) DISTRICT 14 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (37) DISTRICT 14 Consideration of motion to adjourn ` NOTICE TO DIRECTORS To place.items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the —' Joint Boards, Directors shall submit items to the Board Secretary not later than the close of 3 j business 14 days preceding the Joint Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on I the agenda all items submitted by Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and all formal communications. i Board Secretary: Penny Kyle (714) 962-2411, ext. 2026 I Secretary: Patricia L. Jonk (714) 962-2411, ext. 2029 Secretary: Janet L. Gray (714) 962-2411, ext. 2027 J 3W PDOCISSAG96TED96A 02 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES JOINT BOARD MEETING JANUARY 24, 1996 TRICTS Of p99y yQ2 `� no G Z � C3 u a vwv A CAS C�7 1 90rFcl/NT E ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,2, 3. 5. 6, 7, 71, 13 and 14 of Orange County,California,was held on January,24, 1996, at 7:30 p.m.,in the Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was imbed and the Secretary,reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2,3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13,and 14 as follows: ACTNE ALTERNATE ` DIRECTORS DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO. 1: x Pal McGuigan, Chair Ted R.Moreno James M.Fanyman,Chair pro tam g Arlene Schafer x Mark A.Murphy Joanne County Thomas R.Betrayal Jim from x Roger Stanton Wibiam G.Steiner DISTRICT NO.2: 3 John ColsDI,Chair George Scon _ Daniel T.Watch.Clear po tam Jahn M.Gielixeon • Barry Danes Bob Bell • Burnie Dunlap Glenn Parker • Norman Z.Ecksmode Carol Downey James H.Flom Steve Anderson _ x Pat McGuigan Ted R.Moreno Mark A.Murphy Joanne Cooley Chris Nprb, x Don Bankhead Sheldon Singer _ George L Maker Roger Stanton _ erosion G. Steiner Bob Zoned _ Tom Daly DISTRICT NO.3: x Sal A.Skills,Chair Harry M.Wn. y Burnie Dunlap,Chair pro ten Glenn Parker x Walter Bowman Gail Kerry George Grown Marilyn Bruce Hastings Jahn Collins George Boon * James H.Flan Steve Anderson $ Don R.Griffin Patsy Marshall Victor Leiprig Ralph Bauer x Wally Om Eva G.Miner A Pat McGuigan Ted R.Moreno Chris Norby Don Bankhead Margie L.Rice James V.Evans Sheldon Singer George L.Direst x Roger Stanton evident G.Steiner g Charles SyNn Rpban WaMstrom x Bob Zemel Tom Dal, DISTRICT NO.5: �_ Jan Debby,Chair John C.Cos.Jr. Wiliam G.Steins,Chair pm rem _ Roger Stanton Jots C.Cox,Jr. _ Jan Debby DISTRICT NO.6: James M.Ferrymen,Chair g All"Schafer Jan Debby,Chair Wo tam _ Jem C.Co.,Jr. y Wllien G. Smelter _ Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO.7: Barry Hammond,Chair _ Mike Ward Thomas R. Saltarelli,Chair pro tam _ Jim Potts Jan Debay John C.Cox.Jr. James M.Ferryman Arena Scheme Pat McGuigan TO R.Moreno Mark A.Murphy Jeanne Coon William G.Steiner Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO.11: g Victor Losing.Chair _ Ralph Bauer g Share, Dettloff, Chair pro tern _ Ralph Baba x Roger Stanton Witham G.Steiner DISTRICT NO.13: John M.Gullisson.Chair Daniel T.Welch Bob Zombi,Chair pro tam Tom Daly JL� Bunie Dunlap Glenn Parker Mark A.Murphy Joanne Cistern William G. Steiner Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO.14: Thomas R.Bluntness,Chair _ Jim Pont g Mark A.Murphy, Chair pro tam _ Joanne Cpomr Barry Hammond _ Mike Want _JL William G.Steiner _ Roger Stanton Peer A.Swan _ Darryl Miller .2- 1/24/96 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Don McIntyre, General Manager, Blake P. Anderson,- Assistant General Manager-Operations, Judith A. Wilson, Assistant General Manager-Administration, Penny Kyle, Board Secretary, Mark Esquer, John Finias, Janet Gray, Gary Hasenstab, Irvin Haydock, Ed Hodges, Steve Hovey, Patricia Jonk, Terri Jos*ay, Steve Kozak, John Linder, David Ludwin, Greg Mathews, Pat McNelly, Bob Ooten, Mike Peterman, Gary Streed, Michelle Tuchman, Dan Tunnicliff, Nancy Wheatley, Paula Zeller OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Bill Butler, Bill Knopf, Phil Stone, George Zlaket, Alternate Director DISTRICTS 2.3.13 & 14 Receive and file minute excerpts re Board aopointments Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the minute excerpts from the following re election of mayors, appointments of alternate Directors, and seating new members of the Boards, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed, as follows: ('Mayor) City/Aoencv District Active Director Alternate Director Buena Park 3 Don R. Griffin Patsy Marshall' Brea 2,3 & 13 Bumie Dunlap- Glenn Parker Fountain Valley 2 & 3 John Collins George Scott' Fullerton 2 & 3 Chris Norby' Don Bankhead La Habra 2 & 3 James H. Flora Steve Anderson' Los Alamitos 3 Charles E. Sylvia Robert Wahlstrom' Placentia 2 Norman Z. Eckenrode Carol Downey' Stanton 3 Sal A. Sapien Harry M. Dotson Yorba Linda 2 Daniel T. Welch John M. Gullixson' 13 John M. Gullixson' Daniel T. Welch Midway City 3 Margie L. Rice James V. Evans Sanitary District Irvine Ranch 14 Peer A. Swan Darryl G. Miller Water District -3- 1/24196 DISTRICTS 3 & 11 Receive. file. and accept resignation of Mayor Dave Sullivan of the City of Huntington Beach and seatino first and second alternates to the Mayor Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the letter from Mayor Dave Sullivan of the City of Huntington Beach resigning from the Boards of Directors of District Nos. 3 and 11, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the following first and second alternates to the mayor be seated as members of the Boards: District Active Director Alternate Director 3 & 11 Victor Leipzig Ralph Bauer 11 Shirley Dettloff Ralph Bauer DISTRICT 3 Receive, file, and accept resignation of Mayor Duane Schuster of the City of La Palma and seating first and second alternates to the Mayor Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the letter from Mayor Duane Schuster of the City of La Palma resigning from the Board of Directors of District No. 3, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the following first and second alternates to the Mayor be seated as members of the Board: District Active Director Alternate Director 3 Wally Linn Eva G. Miner A- 1/24/96 ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Joint Chair The Joint Chair announced that an adjourned regular meeting will be called for all Districts on Wednesday, February 14, 1996 to discuss the landfill acquisition. The Orange County Investment Pool agreement with the County of Orange could possibly be added to the same agenda. Joint Chair Cox reminded the Directors of the Joint Board Meeting regarding the Strategic Plan Workshop being held on Saturday, January 27, 1996 at 9:00 AM to 12:00 PM. This meeting would be a review of alternatives to determine Districts' policies for the strategic plan. In addition, the business community and environmental community were invited to attend. It was then reported that at the CASA Conference held in Palm Springs, District staff members made presentations on various issues of privatization, what it means to be "business friendly", and the positive impacts of reclaimed water on the bay. The Joint Chair commended Irwin Haydock, Mike Moore, Adriana Renescu and Mahin Talebi for their excellent presentations. The following tentatively scheduled upcoming meetings were then announced: Ad Hoc Committee re Landfill Issues -Wednesday, January 31, at 5:30 pm Planning, Design, and Construction Committee -Thursday, February 1, at 5:30 pm Operations, Maintenance, and Technical Services Committee -Wednesday, February 7, at 5:30 pm Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee -Wednesday, February 14, at 5:30 pm Adjourned Regular Meeting -Wednesday, February 14, at 7:30 p.m. Executive Committee - Wednesday, February 21, at 5:30 p.m. ALL DISTRICTS Presentation of service oin to District Employee Robert J. Ooten Assistant General Manager, Blake Anderson, recognized Districts' Director of Operations, Robert J. Ooten, for 15 years of service to the Districts and presented Mr. Ooten with a 15-year service pin. -5- 1/24/96 ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Joint Chair The Joint Chair announced that an adjourned regular meeting may need to be called for all Districts on Wednesday, February 14, 1996 to discuss the landfill acquisition. The Orange County Investment Pool agreement with the County of Orange could possibly be added to the same agenda. Joint Chair Cox reminded the Directors of the Joint Board Meeting regarding the Strategic Plan Workshop being held on Saturday, January 27, 1996 at 9:00 AM to 12:00 PM. This meeting would be a review of alternatives to determine Districts' policies for the strategic plan. In addition, the business community and environmental community were invited to attend. It was then reported that at the CASA Conference held in Palm Springs, District staff members made presentations on various issues of privatization, what it means to be "business friendly", and the positive impacts of reclaimed water in the bay. The Joint Chair commended Irwin Haydock, Mike Moore, Adriana Renescu and Mahin Talebi for their excellent presentations. The following tentatively scheduled upcoming meetings were then announced, as follows: Ad Hoc Committee re Landfill Issues -Wednesday, January 31, at 5:30 p.m. Planning, Design, and Construction Committee -Thursday, February 1, at 5:30 p.m. Operations, Maintenance, and Technical Services Committee -Wednesday, February 7, at 5:30 p.m. Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee -Wednesday, February 14, at 5:30 p.m. Adjourned Regular Meeting -Wednesday, February 14, at 7:30 p.m. Executive Committee - Wednesday, February 21, at 5:30 p.m. ALL DISTRICTS Presentation of service pin to District Employee Robert J. Ooten Joint Chair Cox recognized Districts' Director of Operations, Robert J. Ooten, for 15 years of service to the Districts and presented Mr. Ooten with a 15-year service pin. -5- 1/24/96 ALL DISTRICTS Report of the General Counsel The General Counsel referred District No. 3 Directors to a memorandum included in their meeting folders that evening, updating Directors on the status of the matter entitled County Sanitation Districts No. 3 v. United Technologies Corporation, at al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 722816. DISTRICT 1 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held December 13, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. Director Roger Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. DISTRICT 2 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held December 13, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. Director Roger Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. DISTRICT 3 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held December 13, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. Director Roger Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. DISTRICT 5 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held December 13, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -6- 1/24/96 DISTRICT 6 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held December 13, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 7 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held December 13, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 11 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held December 13, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. Director Roger Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. DISTRICT 13 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held December 13, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 14 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meetings held November 15, 1995, and December 13, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -7- 1/24/96 ALL DISTRICTS Ratification of Payment of Joint and Individual District Claims Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That payment of Joint and Individual District claims set forth on exhibits "A" , "B", "C", "D", and "E"attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. 11/15/95 1129/95 DISTRICT NO. 14 - $ 311.129 19 fi 4 563.18 12/13/95 1227/95 01/10196 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $775,555.24 $747,037.33 $590262.64 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 393,437.92 1,311,228.89 260,472.07 Joint Worldng Capital Fund - 471.937.47 212,140.44 225,832.58 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 69,738.87 922520 18,647.75 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 560.60 3,000.00 9,528.64 DISTRICT NO.2 - 30,632.89 1,113.50 46,632.37 DISTRICT NO.3 - 188,228.36 147,793.23 69,96525 DISTRICT NO.5 - 4,801.27 648.54 18,008.38 DISTRICT NO.6 - 161.60 62.31 2,59323 DISTRICT NO.7 - 479,491.04 42,619.70 50,673.44 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 592.00 108.379.84 129,423.70 DISTRICT NO. 13 - 0.00 0.00 154.75 DISTRICT NO. 14 - 15.95 19,941.50 465.52 DISTRICTS NOS.5&6 JOINT - 278.432.18 25,581.80 80,847.33 DISTRICTS NOS.6&7 JOINT - 2.042.89 21128 1.960.71 DISTRICTS NOS.7&14 JOINT - 6,707.57 15.83 5,169.96 $2.702.335.85 $2.628.999.39 $1.510.838.32 -8- 1/24/96 ALL DISTRICTS Authorizina renewal of memberships in the California Association of Sanitation Agencies (CASA) and the Association of Metropolitan Seweraae Aaencies (AMSA) for the 1996 calendar year Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That renewal of memberships in the California Association of Sanitation Agencies (CASA) and the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies (AMSA)for the 1996 calendar year be, and are hereby, authorized. ALL DISTRICTS (PDC95-26) Accepting Purchase of Spark Ignited Enaines for Use in Central Power Generation Systems, Job No. J-19A. as complete Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 96-1, accepting Purchase of Spark Ignited Engines for use in Central Power Generation Systems, Job No. J-19A, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion, and approving final Closeout Agreement for a final total contract amount of $19,436,644.82. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file draft minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re Landfill Issues Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the draft minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re Landfill Issues meetings held on December 13 and December 27, 1995, and January 10 and January 17, 1996, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. -9- 1/24/96 ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file draft minutes of the Steering Committee Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the draft minutes of the Steering Committee meeting held on December 13, 1995, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file draft minutes of the Operations. Maintenance. and Technical Services Committee Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the draft minutes of the Operations, Maintenance, and Technical Services Committee meeting held on January 3, 1996, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file draft minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization Studv Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the draft minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization Study meeting held on January 4, 1996, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file draft minutes of the Plannina. Design, and Construction Committee Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the draft minutes of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee meeting held on January 4, 1996, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed, -10- 1/24/96 ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file draft minutes of the Finance. Administration. and Human Resources Committee Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the draft minutes of the Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee meeting held on January 10, 1996, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file draft minutes of the Executive Committee Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the draft minutes of the Executive Committee meeting held on January 17, 1996, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Retaining current committee system of three policy committees, and convening the Executive Committee on an as-needed basis Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors concur with the recommended actions of the Steering Committee to retain the current committee system of three policy committees, and convene the Executive Committee on an as-needed basis. ALL DISTRICTS (PDC96-02) Accepting Miscellaneous Improvements at Plant No 1. Job No. P1-42, and Miscellaneous Improvements at Plant No. 2. Job No. P249. as complete Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 96-2, accepting Miscellaneous Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-42, and Miscellaneous Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P249, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion, and approving Final Closeout Agreement for a final total contract amount of$239,213.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. _11_ 1/24/96 ALL DISTRICTS (PDC96-04) Aoorovino plans and specifications re Job Nos. P1-41: Pl-43: P1-44: P246: P2-50: P2-53-2: SP199500217SP19950059 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 96-3, approving plans and specifications for Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers 3,4, and 5 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-41; Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-43; Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-44; Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers D through 0 at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-48; Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-50; Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53-2; Tunnel Cover Replacement at Billings Tunnel at Plant No. 2, SP19950021; Sludge Piping Modification Primary Sedimentation Basins 6-15, SP19950059, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS (PDC96-05) Actions re Demolition of Old Laboratory. Job No. J-11-1. and Restoration of Old Laboratory for Human Resources Department, Job No. J-11-2 Providing for the conversion of the Old Laboratory, Job No. J-11-1. to Restoration of Old Laboratory for Human Resources Deoartment. Job No. J-11-2 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the conversion of the Old Laboratory, Job No. J-11-1, to Restoration of Old Laboratory for Human Resources Department, Job No. J-11-2, and providing for funds in the amount of$375,000.00 for said project, be, and is hereby, approved. -12- M4i96 Authorizina the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids for Interior Asbestos Removal from Old Laboratory, Job No. J-11-1A Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to establish the date for receipt of bids for Interior Asbestos Removal from Old Laboratory, Job No. J-11-1A; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the budgeted amount of$150,000.00, which was an approved portion of Job No. J-11-1, be, and is hereby, authorized to be transferred to Job No. J-11-1A. ALL DISTRICTS (PDC96-061 Approving Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers re Job Nos. J-33 and J-34 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee certification of the final negotiated fee relative to Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers to prepare plans and specifications and to provide construction support services for Standby Power Reliability Modifications, Job No. J-33, and Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades, Job No. J-34, providing for additional design and construction services, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed, and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 964, approving Addendum No. 1 to said agreement with John Carollo Engineers for said additional services on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, subconsultant fees, and fixed profit, for an additional amount not to exceed $226,740.00, increasing the total authorized compensation from $950,252.00 to an amount not to exceed $1,176,992.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -13- 1124/96 ALL DISTRICTS (OMTS95-041) Actions re Comoressed Natural Gas Refueling Station, Job No. P1-51 AAoproving Professional Services Agreement with SoCalGas Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 96-5, approving Professional Services Agreement with Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas)for design and construction management services for Compressed Natural Gas Refueling Station, Job No. P1-51, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, for an amount not to exceed $64,500.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. Authorizing the General Manager to solicit bids and award purchase order contract re Job No. PI-51A Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to solicit bids re Purchase of Equipment for Compressed Natural Gas Refueling Station, Job No. P1-51A; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to award a purchase order contract to the lowest bidder for an amount not to exceed $399,300.00, plus applicable taxes and freight. ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file monthly investment report of Pacific Investment Management Company Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the monthly investment report regarding performance monitoring of Pacific Investment Management Company be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. -14- 1/24/96 DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7 & 11 (ONLY) Actions re AIG Financial Products Corp. (AIG) for replacement of Letter of Credit. Refunding Certificates of Particioation. Series 1992 Approving Substitute Standby Certificate Purchase Agreement with Barclays Bank Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt the following resolutions, approving Substitute Standby Certificate Purchase Agreement with Barclays Bank, and authorizing staff to take all necessary actions re replacement of the Standby Letter of Credit: District No. Resolution No. 1 96-6-1 2 96-7-2 3 96-8-3 5 96-9-5 6 96-10-6 7 96-11-7 11 96-12-11 Authorizing staff to retain services of bond counsel and authorizing the General Manager to execute agreement Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to retain the services of a bond counsel firm for the transaction, as recommended by General Counsel, in an amount not to exceed $25,000.00, to be reimbursed to the Districts by AIG; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to execute said agreement, in form approved by General Counsel. -15- 1124/96 Directing staff to submit all necessary documents for this transaction at the January 24 1996 meeting for execution Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, directed to submit all necessary documents for this transaction to the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 & 11, at the January 24, 1996 meeting for execution. ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR96-02) Authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to AmeriData for Purchase of Four Compaq Server-Class Computers (Specification No. E-262R-2) Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue a purchase order to AmeriData for Four Compaq Server-Class Computers (Specification No. E-262R-2), for use as Districts'-wide network servers, for a total amount not to exceed $135,875.00, plus sales tax and 1% WAS fees. Director Mark A. Murphy requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR96-03) Amending Resolution No. 95-105. Authorizing the establishment of Provisions for Programmers covered by the Professional Employees MOU for standby and callback pay Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 96-13, amending Resolution No. 95-105, authorizing the establishment of provisions for Programmers covered by the Professional Employees MOU for standby and callback pay. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -16- 1/24/96 ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR96-05) Amendino Resolution No. 95-105, Rescinding provisions granting a 1% salary increase to all employees re retiree medical health premium offset grogram Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 96-14, amending Resolution No. 95-105, rescinding provisions granting a 1% salary increase to all employees re retiree medical health premium offset program. Director John M. Gullixson requested that his opposition to the motion be made a matter of record. ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR96-08) Authorizing staff to report to Southern California Association of Governments (SCAGj Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to report to Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) the Sanitation Districts' position on the Finance Chapter of SCAG's Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide. ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR96-06) Actions re Benchmarking and Performance Measurement Update Verbal report of Assistant General Manager The Assistant General Manager, Judy Wilson, gave a brief report on Benchmarking and Performance Measurement. She then introduced Greg Mathews, Principle Administrative Analyst, who gave an overview of costs over the last ten years, and Bob Ooten, Director of Operations, who shared his observations on the privatization program in Indianapolis. Receive and file staff report Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the staff report dated January 10, 1996 re Benchmarking and Performance Measurement Update, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. -17- 1124/96 ALL DISTRICTS Directing that the Board of Supervisors be ree uested to file a Resolution of Application with the Local Agency Formation Commission ILAFCO)for County Sanitation District No. 99 re pr000sed acquisition of County of Orange Integrated Waste Management System After a brief update by the Assistant General Managers of Administration and Operations, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 96-15, directing that the Orange County Board of Supervisors be requested to file a Resolution of Application with the Orange County Local Agency Formation Commission initiating proceedings relative to proposed formation of County Sanitation District No. 99 for acquisition, maintenance, and operation of a landfill and refuse disposal system. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. Director Victor Leipzig requested that his opposition to the motion be made a matter of record. ALL DISTRICTS Status report re County's Commingled Investment Pool Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager of Operations, gave a brief report on the status of the Orange County Commingled Investment Pool Committee and the County of Orange bankruptcy. ALL DISTRICTS General Counsel's comments Prior to Closed Session General Counsel reported to the Directors the need for a closed session as authorized by Government Code Section 54956.9 to discuss and consider the item that is specified as Item 15(b)(1) on the published Agenda. -18- 1/24/96 ALL DISTRICTS Convene in Closed Session pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 The Boards convened in closed session at 8:35 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Boards of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. A report of actions taken will be publicly reported at the time the approved action becomes final re Agenda Item 15(b)(1). ALL DISTRICTS Reconvene in regular session At 8:46 p.m., the Boards reconvened in regular session. DISTRICT 1 Addournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:46 p.m. DISTRICT 2 Addiournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:46 p.m. -19- 1/24196 DISTRICT 3 (PDC96-01) Actions re Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 2 (5,800 feet North of Rosecrans Avenue to Imperial Highway), Contract No. 3-38-2 AApprovino Change Order No. 1 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing an addition of$45,255.68 to the contract with Calfon Construction, Inc. for seven items of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. Approving Change Order No. 2 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing a deduction of$32,126.00 from the contract with Calfon Construction, Inc. for adjustment of engineer's quantities, be, and is hereby, approved. Acceptino Contract No. 3-38-2 as complete Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 96-16-3, accepting said project as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion, and approving final Closeout Agreement for a final total contract amount of $1,104,882.68. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 3 Adjoumment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:46 p.m. -20- 1/24/96 DISTRICT 5 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:46 p.m. DISTRICT 6 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:46 p.m. DISTRICT 7 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:46 p.m. DISTRICT 11 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:46 p.m. DISTRICT 13 Adiournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:46 p.m. -21- 1/24/96 DISTRICT 14 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:46 p.m. {/Jl Secretary of&Ao r of Directors of County SarVion ' tricts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5. 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14 -22- FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 11/10195 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITAT.ON DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 11/15/95 POSTING DATE 11/16/95 SUMMARY AMOUNT 61 OPER FUND $231.50 01 CONSTR FUND $1.345.57 02 OPER FUND $1.169.25 02 CAP FAC FUND $46,970.48 02 CONSTR FUND $4,694.95 03 OPER FUND $25,127A0 03 CAP FAC FUND $423,166S2 03 CONSTR FUND $3.873AD O5 OPER FUND $429,80 05 CONSTR FUND $1.076.49 06 OPER FUND $173.00 O6 CONSTR FUND $768,08 07 OPER FUND $8,864.61 07 CAP FAC FUND $550.170.80 X 07 CONSTR FUND $1,307.43 x 011 OPER FUND $249.25 011 CAP FAC FUND S202,877.12 011 CONST FUND $1.197.87 --I 913 0PER FUND $8.50 D 000NS UND $3.40 14 OPER FUND 550.00 S 50.00 014 CAP FAC FUND $311,059.23 311,059.23 914 CONST FUND 518.9E 19.96 05&6 OPER FUND $166.94 05&6 CAP FAC FUND $156,990.37 5311.129.19 07 614 OPER FUND $794.77 JT OPER FUND $658,139.29 CORF S918,505.92 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $19,724.59 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL S3D6,045.29 $3.644.561.74 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 112N85 PAGES - - REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 1129/95 POSTING DATE 1129195 WARRANT NO. VENDOR 148595 WACKENHUT CORP. $14.300.70 CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS 148596 WALL STREET JOURNAL 5306.01 SUBSCRIPTION 148597 WARREN GORHAM 5 LAMONT INC $190.74 PUBLICATION 148598 WA%IE $222.71 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 148599 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $23,912.54 CAUSTIC SODA MO 6-23.95 148600 WEST-UTE SUPPLY CO. SB13.23 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 148601 WESCO $574.93 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 148602 WOLFE AND ASSOCIATES,INC. $3.940.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 148603 ROURKE,WOODRUFF 8 SPRADUN $92,805.51 LEGAL SERVICES MO 7.26.95 146604 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $979.54 LAB SUPPLIES 148605 JOHNSON YOKOGAWA CORP. SBISS INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES Tn TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 1120195 $1.851.112.20 X 2 to SUMMARY AMOUNT 0TJ 1 02 OPER FUND 114.25 02 CAP FAC FUND $2,041.51 03 OPER FUND $52.621.92 - 03 CAP PAC FUND $23.926.29 05 OPER FUND $689.25 07 OPER FUND $430.42 07 CAP FAC FUND $20,292.92 011 OPER FUND $9.593.96 4 UN51,94o.a3 $1,940.43 014 CAP FAC FUND $2.622.75 2,622.75 0596 OPER FUND $17.80 0687 OPER FUND $211.12 $4,563.18 07614 OPER FUND $16.59 JT OPER FUND $913.082.79 CORE $569.680.05 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $28.159.68 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $225.570,47 $1.851,112.20 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 12108195 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 12/13195 POSTING DATE 12/13/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 148631 A-1 VISUAL SYSTEMS $1,533.50 OFFICE SUPPLIES 148632 ABB INDUSTRIAL SYSTEMS INC $2,660.00 TRAINING-MAINTENANCE 148633 AG TECH COMPANY $58.160.83 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10.9.91 148634 ABRASIVE ENG.TOOLING&EQUIP, $142.49 HARDWARE 148635 ACORN CONSULTING $4,485.00 CONSULTING SERVICES 148636 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $18.037.20 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.0.8-9-09 148637 ALTA-ROBBINS $320.70 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 148638 AMERIDATA $1.495.49 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 148639 BLAKE P.ANDERSON 5108.57 REIMBURSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE 148640 ANIXTER-DISTRIBUTION $494.79 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 148641 APPLE ONE $4.083.20 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 148642 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $16.168.95 - OFFICE EQUIPMENT 148643 AQUATIC BIOASSAY&CONSULT $2.835.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT m 148644 ARENS INDUSTRIES,INC. $4.072.51 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES x 145645 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT $551.90 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 148646 ARMOR-VAC $1,500.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES w 148647 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. $120.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL 148648 ASSOCIATED CONCRETE PRODUCTS $533.38 BUILDING MATERIALS 148649 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $4.333.66 PAYROLL SERVICES n 148650 E S BABCOCK&SONS INC $555.00 LAB ANALYSIS 1� 148657 BANANA BLUEPRINT $592.88 PRINTING M.0.11-07-84 148652 BANCROFT-WHITNEY CO.. $333.48 PUBLICATION 148653 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $810.20 BATTERIES 148654 BAUER COMPRESSOR $311.00 COMPRESSOR PARTS 148655 BEAR STATE PUMP&EQUIP $794.76 PUMP PARTS 148656 BEHR PROCESS CORP $62.94 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT - 148657 BEV CUSTER $86.20 PUBLICATIONS 148658 WT BILLARD $588.69 BUILDING REPAIRS 145659 BIO-GRO DIVISION $43,309.28 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 4-26.95 148660 BLAIR-MARTIN CO,INC. $189.43 VALVE MANIFOLDS 148661 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $16.728.10 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1d1,P2.48 148662 BNI BOOKS $167.80 BOOKS 148663 _ THE BURKE COMPANY $86.12 CONTAINERS 148664 BURKE ENGINEERING CO $292.17 ELECTRIC PARTS 148665 BUSH&ASSOCIATES,INC. S4,5D4.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6&94 148666 CH2M HILL $215,760.82 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-31 148667 C.L.TECHNOLOGY $720.00 GAS ANALYSIS SERVICES 148668 CM H SOFTWARE $256.50 SOFTWARE 14BB69 C.P.I. $1.549.91 LAB SUPPLIES 148670 CS COMPANY $8,012.92 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 148671 CALFON CONSTRUCTION $452,384.84 CONSTRUCTION 7-22&7-24 148672 CALTROL,INC. $9,552.85 HARDWARE 148673 CALIFORNIA AUTO COLLISION,INC. $2,581.01 TRUCK BODY REPAIR 148674 CALIF.ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS $16.00 MECHANICAL PARTS 148675 CALIFORNIA WATER ENVIRONMENTAL $855.48 PUBLICATIONS 148676 CAMAU CORP. $400.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 12108MS PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 12JIYOS POSTING DATE 12/13/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 148677 CANUS CORPORATION $593.39 FIBER OPTIC CABLE 148678 CARLETON ENGINEERS $25.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES-AIR QUALITY 148679 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $348.25 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-38,J-33 148680 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $1,458.78 OFFICE FURNITURE 148681 CERFNET $52.35 COMPUTER SERVICES 148682 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $10J17.73 PUMP PARTS 148683 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $16,571.44 ELECTRIC PARTS 148684 CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS $813.60 FREIGHT 146685 CONSUMER PIPE $1,077.64 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 148686 CONTINENTAL EQUIP&SUPPLY $548.73 MISC.HARDWARE 148687 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $3,368.51 ENGINE PARTS m 148688 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $132.18 TRUCK PARTS X 148689 COUNTERPART ENTERPRISES $246.86 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES = 148690 COUNTY CLERK $200.00 EXEMPTION FEE Ly 148691 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $3,772.65 ELECTRIC PARTS 148692 CREATIVE SCREEN ARTS $420.33 SAFETY TAGS 148693 CROMPTON&KNOWLES COLORS $181.80 TRACING DYE ['l 148694 CHARLES P.CROWLEY,CO. $911.99 INSTRUMENT PARTS 148695 OGS-PROCUREMENT $75.00 PUBLICATIONS fJ 148696 ALBERT W DAMES INC $135,285.34 CONSTRUCTION 3-36R 148697 DELL COMPUTER CORP $25,275.39 COMPUTER PARTS 148695 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIF, $34,363.26 DENTAL INSURANCE PUN M.0.1-12-94 148699 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $940.00 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 148700 DRESSER INDUSTRIES $2,133.68 INSTRUMENT PARTS 148101 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $299.44 PAINT SUPPLIES 148702 DUALS SALES $428.58 FITTINGS 148703 ESP NORTH $1,857.22 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 148704 E-TRACE INSTRUMENTS $287.00 COMPUTER PARTS 148705 EDWARDS HIGH VACUUM INTER. $148.92 LAB SUPPLIES 148706 HELEN EGGERS $401.08 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 148707 ELECT AIR TOOL CO $762.17 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 148708 ENCHANTER,INC. $2.800.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5.24.95 148709 ESSCO PUMPS AND CONTROLS $401.17 PUMP PARTS 148710 ENVIRONMENTAL PROD.USA $2.413.60 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 148711 EXFO $0,795.00 FIBEROPTIC TEST KIT 148712 FLUID TECH.SALES $2,146A4 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 148713 FST SAND AND GRAVEL,INC. $511.04 ROAD BASE MATERIALS 148714 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $13,535.00 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9.91 148715 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $549.75 AIR FREIGHT 148716 FIRST CHOICE $810.55 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT 148717 FISCHER B PORTER CO. $355.21 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 148718 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $1.370.50 LAB SUPPLIES 148719 FISONS INSTRUMENTS $840.45 LAB SUPPLIES 148720 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $261.19 PHOTO SUPPLIES ' 148721 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $18,678.06 WATER USE 148722 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $496A0 PAINT SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE IDOW95 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 12J13195 POSTING DATE 12113195 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 148723 THE FOXBORO CO. $133.09 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 148724 FRY'S ELECTRONICS $573.65 ELECTRONIC B COMPUTER SUPPLIES 148725 FULLER FORD $17.729.19 TRUCK 148726 CITY OF FULLERTON $373.51 WATER USE 148727 GET,INC. $1.032.66 OFFICE SUPPLIES 148728 GANAHL LUMBER CO. 2206.87 LUMBERAIARDWARE 146729 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $2,569.54 CHEMICALS 148730 THE GARTNER GROUP $32.583.34 SERVICE AGREEMENT 148731 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $388.69 ELECTRIC PARTS 148732 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1,024.97 TELEPHONE SERVICES 146733 GIERLICH4.UTCHELL,INC. $6.157.48 PUMP PARTS 148734 GA INDUSTRIES INC. $1,485.00 VALVE X 148735 GOODWAY TECHNOLOGIES CORP. $999.49 INDUSTRIAL VACUUM = 148738 GOVT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOC. $480.00 CAER AWARD SUBMITTAL r-i 148737 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $3.886.01 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 148738 GRASSY S.T.I. $2,389.26 ENGINE PARTS _4 148739 GRAYBAR 580.30 COMMUNICATION SUPPLIES n 148740 DGA CONSULTANTS $10,806.11 SURVEYING SERVICES MOB-23-95&MO 641-94 1 148741 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS $3.786.60 CONTAINER RENTALS w 148742 PL HAWN CO,INC. $9,440.42 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 148743 HELLO DIRECT $397.35 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 1487" HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT $2.003.33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN. 148745 HEWLETTPACKARD $202.58 SERVICE AGREEMENT 148746 MILT,INC. $3.045.03 TOOLS 148747 HOERSIGER CVS CALIF., INC. $279.08 COMPRESSOR PARTS 148748 HOLMES&NARVER,INC. $34,547.59 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1.44,P2-53 148749 HOME DEPOT $698.07 SMALL HARDWARE 148750 SOUTHWEST SCIENTIFIC,INC. $928.18 METER PARTS 148751 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $1,407.77 PAINT SUPPLIES 148752 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $19.33 WATER USE 146753 HYCLONE LABORATORIES INC $820.51 LAB SUPPLIES 148764 IDM CONTROLS INC $303.90 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 148755 IEEE SERVICE CENTER - C87 $766.65 PUBLICATIONS 148756 IPCO SAFETY $4.081.19 SAFETY SUPPLIES 148757 IRD MECHANALYSIS $537.54 INSTRUMENT PARTS 148755 ITT BARTON SALES $2,023.51 BACKFLOW TESTERS 148759 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $124,588.93 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11.18-92 148760 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $218.51 CONNECTORS 148761 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT 85A0 WATER USE 148762 J.D.I.TECHNOLOGIES $50D.63 PRINTER PARTS 148763 JIT COMPUTER SOURCE,INC. $1,906.10 SOFTWARE 148764 JAMISON ENGINEERING $5,105.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 148765 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $603.28 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 148766 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO. $2,829.66 GAUGE ' 146767 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $137.69 ELECTRIC PARTS 148768 JONES CHEMICALS,INC. $15.239.78 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE NO 4415-95 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE IVOW95 PAGE4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 12/13/95 POSTING DATE 12/13/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 146759 KALLEENS COMPUTER PRODUCTS $1.190.98 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 148710 FRANCES L.KALUZNY $1.760.00 HUMAN RESOURCES CONSULTANT 145"1 KENNEDY HYDRAULICS $1,357.38 MOTOR REPAIRS 148772 KING BEARING,INC. $1.548.42 MACHINE SUPPLIES 148773 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES E3,096.24 TOOLS 148774 LEE&RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC. $8.353.31 ENGINEERING SERVICES 140775 K.P.LINDSTROM.INC. $9,656AI ENVIR.CONSULTING SERVICES MO 12.9-90 148776 MPS $97.88 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 140777 MACOMCO 5464d0 SERVICE AGREEMENT 148778 NAG SYSTEMS $526.90 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 148779 MAINTENANCE TECH.SERV. $1.141.14 MISC.HARDWARE 148780 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS,INC. $5.088.21 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES m 148781 MARDEN SUSCO INC. $93.75 PLUMBING SUPPLIES Z 148782 DICK E MARSH $40.00 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 148783 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $576.65 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES to 148784 MIDWAY MFG.&MACHINING $8,028.39 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 148785 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3.405.35 UNIFORM RENTALS n 1487BS MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO. 5217.00 INSTRUMENT I 148787 MOORE INDUSTRIES $972.83 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES r 148768 NEC TECHNOLOGIES,INC. $6,215.65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 148789 NATIONAL ENVIRO.INFO.SERV. 5111.50 PUBLICATION 148790 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES $6.001.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 148791 NATIONAL WATER RESEARCH $50,000.00 ANNUAL CONTRIBUTION-NWRI 148792 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $676.13 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 148793 NETWORK GENERAL CORP. $4.999.61 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 148794 NEWARK ELECTRONICS $260.52 INSTRUMENT PARTS 148795 NICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY $3.144.43 LUBRICANTS/DIESEL FUEL 148796 LOYD T.NITZEN II AND $22,000.00 LIABILITY CLAIM SETTLEMENT 148797 NORGREN $169.40 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 148798 NORTEL PRODUCT TRAINING $1.345.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 148799 NU-WEST FABRICATION 5304.28 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 148800 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $4,438.45 OFFICE SUPPLIES 148801 THE OHMART CORP $1.113.91 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 148802 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $2,318.28 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 148803 ORANGE COURIER 5294S0 COURIER SERVICES 148804 ORANGE VALVE&FTTTING CO. $2.626.01 FITTINGS 148505 ORRICK HERRINGTON&SUTCLIFFE $4,000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 148806 OXYGEN SERVICE $2.547.39 SPECIALTY GASES 148807 COUNTY OF ORANGE $60.00 ADMINISTRATIVE FEES 148808 ORANGE CO EMPLOYEES $204.796.00 EARLY RETIREMENT PROGRAM MO 34.95 148809 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $10.80.51 WORKERS COMP REIMBURSEMENT 148810 COUNTY OF ORANGE $199.00 PERMITS 148811 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT $54.594.50 GAP WATER USE M.O.6-9-93 148812 PSI $881.52 HARDWARE ' 148813 PSOC(POOL SUPPLY OF OC) $113.73 OPERATING SUPPLIES 148814 PSSI $5.445.46 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 12/08195 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 12H3/95 POSTING DATE 12/13/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 148816 PACIFIC CLIPPINGS $113.20 CONTRACT SERVICE 148816 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $1,777.66 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 148817 PACIFIC PARTS $55,623.20 INSTRUMENT PARTS 148818 PACO PUMPS $1,466.22 FITTINGS 148819 PACIFIC BELL $16.62 TELEPHONE SERVICES 148820 PACIFIC WALK-IN MEDICAL $60.00 MEDICAL SERVICES 148821 PAGENET $82.10 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 148822 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $5,294.30 REIMS.PETTY CASH,TRAINING 8 TRAVEL 148823 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $110.041.20 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3-29.95 148824 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS $358.06 CONSULTING SERVICE 148825 POLYPURE,INC. $20.931.50 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3.11-92 148826 POWER DESIGN $943.90 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS m 148821 POWER SYSTEMS TESTING CO. $1,100.00 REPAIR RELAY METERS = 145828 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $96.00 ICE FOR SAMPLES 145829 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE IND. $304.00 SOILTESTING 148830 PROMINENT FLUID CONTROL,INC. $799.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL -I 148831 PRIMA $205.00 MEMBERSHIP FEE t'1 148832 PUBLIC SECTOR EXCELLENCE $2,250.00 TRAINING CONSULTANT-RISK MGMT I 148833 PUMPING SOLUTIONS $176.71 PUMP PARTS 148834 QUESTRON CORP. $948.00 LAB SUPPLIES 148835 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $1,891.16 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS 148836 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $2,062.75 TRASH REMOVAL 148837 RAIN FOR RENT $2,747.94 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 148838 RED WING SHOES $264.29 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 148039 THE REGISTER $2,149.60 NOTICES&ADS 148940 REISH MARINE STUDIES,INC. $760.00 OCEAN MONITORING 148841 REMEDYTEMP $14,709.17 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 148842 REPUBLIC ENGINES $84.47 TRUCK PARTS 148843 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $47.42 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 148844 SCHWING AMERICA.INC. $1.506.43 PUMP PARTS 148845 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $275.84 SPECIALTY GASES 148846 SEA COAST DESIGNS $2.909.25 LAB SUPPLIES 148847 CITY OF SEAL BEACH $301.05 WATER USE 148848 SELF INSURANCE PLANS $674.66 LICENSE FEE 148849 SENTIENT SYSTEMS,INC. $8,400.00 FACILITATOR SERVICES 148850 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $3,464.12 TOOLS 148851 SHASTA ELECTRIC $21,710.00 CONTRACTSERVICE 148852 SHURELUCK SALES $1.650.06 TOOLS0IARDWARE 148853 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $1,798.09 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 148854 SMITH-EMERY CO. $216.00 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-13.94 148855 SOUTH BAY FOUNDRY INC $5,262.81 MANHOLE FRAMES 148856 SOUTH COAST WATER $160.00 LAB SUPPLIES 148857 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. $62,778.45 POWER 148858 STARNA CELLS,INC. $173.19 LAB SUPPLIES 148859 SUMMIT STEEL $2,050.57 METAL 148860 SUNSET FORD $136.19 TRUCK PARTS FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 1VO8195 PAGES - REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 12JI3195 POSTING DATE 12/13195 WARRANT NO. VENDOR 148661 SUPELCO,INC. $81.20 LAB SUPPLIES 148862 SUPER CHEM CORP. $670.80 CHEMICALS 148863 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $214.40 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 148864 TEKMAR COMPANY $181.93 LAB SUPPLIES 148865 THEODORE ROBBINS FORD $2,181.93 VEHICLE RENTAL-SUMMER PROGRAM 148866 THE RYAN TYLER GROUP $740.00 BANK STATEMENT RECONCILIATION 148867 THOMAS BROS MAPS $4,310.00 PRINTING 140868 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $117.28 MECHANICAL PARTS 145869 TONER SYSTEM INTERNATIONAL $1,303.78 PRINTER SUPPLIES 148870 TONY'S LOCK B SAFE SERVICE $148.67 LOCKS 8 KEYS 148871 TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY,INC. $3.973.84 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.0.5-11-94 148872 TRUCK B AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $341.94 TRUCK PARTS TTI 148873 TRUCK PARTS SUPPLY $78.63 TRUCK PARTS X 148674 TRUESDAIL LABS $4.906.00 LAB SERVICES 148875 JG TUCKER 8 SON,INC. $6.526.05 INSTRUMENT PARTS w 148876 TWINING LABORATORIES $13,712.88 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-13.94 145877 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $30.OD LABSUPPLIES 148878 UNISOURCEWOR BUTLER PAPER $239.74 OFFICE SUPPLIES r� 148879 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $62.38 PARCEL SERVICES m 148880 VWR SCIENTIFIC $1.538.83 LAB SUPPLIES 148851 VALIN CORPORATION $680.59 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 148882 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS 52,225.01 FREIGHT 148883 VERNE'S PLUMBING $475.W PLUMBING SERVICES 148884 VERTEX SYSTEMS $7.480.00 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT 148885 VORTEX INDUSTRIES $544.28 BUILDING REPAIRS 148086 WACKENHUT CORP. $31,678.23 CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS 148887 WAL-CON CONSTRUCTION CO. $276,W4.94 CONSTRUCTION 5.37-3 1488H CARL WARREN B CO. 5443.77 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR 148589 WARRINGTON $3.492.50 SERVICE AGREEMENT 148890 WATERS CORPORATION $3.674.01 SERVICE AGREEMENT 148891 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $20.719.94 CAUSTIC SODA MO8-23.95 148092 WEST-UTE SUPPLY CO. $968.04 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 148893 WESCO $14.43 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 1488M WIRE MARKERS,INC. $2.245.72 MARKERS 14BB95 XEROX CORP. $15,387.19 COPIER LEASES 148896 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $860.92 LAB SUPPLIES 148897 RICHARD YOUNG PRODUCTS $660.90 INSTRUMENT PARTS 148898 ZYMARK CORP. $851.23 LIB EOUIPMENT TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 12/13195 $2.702,335.85 FUND NO 9199 . JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE IV08195 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 1211395 POSTING DATE 12/13/95 SUMMARY AMOUNT 91 OPER FUND $560.60 92 OPER FUND $5.402.00 92 CAP FAC FUND $25.170.81 43 OPER FUND $41.851.11 #3 CAP FAC FUND $146,377.25 #5 OPER FUND $4,801.27 46 OPER FUND $161.60 07 OPER FUND $8,690.32 97 CAP FAC FUND $470,800.72 941 OPER FUND $288.00 m 911 CAP FAC FUND $304.00 x 914 CAP FAC FUND $15.95 8586 OPER FUND $2,319.55 9586 CAP FAC FUND 5276,112A3 --1 0667 OPER FUND $2.042.89 Y7814 OPER FUND $6.707.57 C'1 JT OPER FUND $775.555.24 V CORF 6393,437.92 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $69,736.67 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $471,937.47 62,7D2,335.85 FUND NO 910 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1221R5 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 1227195 POSTING DATE 1227195 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 148920 AG TECH COMPANY $63.227.33 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.OAD-9-91 148921 ASL CONSULTING ENGINEERS $1.028.74 ATWOOD SUBTRUNCK PLAN PREPERATION 148922 ACORN CONSULTING $5,070.00 CONSULTING SERVICES 148923 AIR LIQUIDE AMERICA CORP. $289.42 SPECIALTY GASSES 148924 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $10,322.00 O&M AGREEMENT OXYGEN.SYST.M.O.8-M9 148925 ALAMO MOTOR LODGE 5534.91 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 148926 ALL METALS PROCESSING $1,243.29 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 148927 ALUMINUM FORGE CO $1,008.11 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 148928 AMERIDATA $1.588.19 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 148929 AMERICAN AIRLINES 54,149.88 TRAVEL SERVICES 148930 AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION $210.00 SEMINAR-VIDEOTAPE 148931 AMERICAN SIGMA $5,682.76 MISCELLANEOUS HARDWARE m 148932 AMER.SOCIETY FOR MICROBIOLOGY $326.00 LAB SUPPLIES X 148933 AMSCO ENERGY TRADING $121AB3.57 NATURAL GAS MO 6.28-95 148934 AMSCO $68.12 SERVICE AGREEMENT 148935 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL $990.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT � 148936 APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS,INC. $7,185.78 LAB SERVICES C 148937 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) 52,633.11 PRINTER PARTS 1 148938 APPLIED ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS $3,000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1- 148939 AQUATIC BIOASSAY&CONSULT $8,795.00 LABORATORY SERVICES 148940 ARMOR-VAC $522.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 148941 ARROWHEAD ELECTRIC CORP. $346.71 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 148942 ARROWHEAD PURITAS WATERS $3,172.78 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 148943 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. $60.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL 148944 AMSA $425.00 REGISTRATION 140945 ATLANTIC ENERGY SERVICE $8,993.00 GENERATOR REPAIR 148946 BFI MEDICAL WASTE SYSTEMS $87.80 WASTE DISPOSAL 148947 BANANA BLUEPRINT $2.687.24 PRINTING M.O.11-07-94 148948 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $470.91 BATTERIES 148949 BAXTER EDWARDS $1.399.09 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 148950 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS.INC. 53,605.00 LAB SUPPLIES 148951 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $274.65 TRUCK WASH TICKETS 148952 BEAR STATE PUMP&EQUIPMENT $79.10 PUMP PARTS 148953 BECKMAN INDUSTRIAL $1,649.34 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 148954 BEST WESTERN PLAZA INT.INN $911.62 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 148955 BEV CUSTER 513.00 PUBLICATIONS 148956 BLACK PROGRESS REVIEW 5395.00 MESSAGE OF SUPPORT 148957 BLACKWELL WISSENSCHAFT 5203.00 PUBLICATION 148958 BLOOMBERG L.P. $4,919.22 FINANCIAL MONITORING M.O.4-14-93 148959 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $27.243.80 ENGINEERING SERVICES MO 2-9-94&MO 9-27-95 148960 BREA COMMUNITY HOSPITAL $1.082.48 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 148961 BUDGET INN $242.11 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 148962 BUDGET JANITORIAL $4,329.50 JANITORIAL SERVICES MO 1-12-94 148963 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. $112.06 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 148964 BUSH&ASSOCIATES,INC. $7.298.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.641-94 148965 CCI TECHNOLOGIES $826.84 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FUND NO D199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1221/95 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 1227/95 POSTING DATE 1227/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 148966 CEM CORPORATION $185.48 LAB SUPPLIES 148967 CS COMPANY $4,175.98 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 148958 CALTROL,INC. $1.348.50 HARDWARE 148969 CALIF ASSOC.OF SAN.AGENCIES $330.00 REGISTRATION 148970 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $977.58 SERVICE AGREEMENT 148971 CALTEX PLASTICS,INC. $1,490.00 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 148972 CAMAU CORP. $1.255.10 SERVICE AGREEMENT 148973 CANNON EQUIPMENT WEST INC $137.60 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 148974 CANUS CORPORATION $377.10 FIBER OPTIC CABLE 148975 CARLETON ENGINEERS $390.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES-AIR QUALITY 148976 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $48.553.70 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-36&P242 148977 CATALINA CYLINDERS $1,634.62 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT X 148978 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $580.61 OFFICE FURNITURE = 148979 CENTURY SAFETY INST.&SUPPLY $8,336.01 SAFETY SUPPLIES 148980 CERADYNEINC $457.87 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 148961 CHEM SERVICE INC. $215.74 LAB SUPPLIES -4 146982 CLEMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL $20,773.86 CONSULTANT-LANDFILL PROJECT MO 7-31-95 148983 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $466.20 SERVICE AGREEMENT I� 148964 COCO'SC127 $125.20 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT N 148985 COUCH&SONS $95,866.00 CONSTRUCTION IIA7-1 148986 COMBYTE USA INC. $3.775.44 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 148987 CONNELL GM PARTS 7 DIV. $122.43 TRUCK PARTS 148988 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $2.187.65 ELECTRIC PARTS 14BD89 CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS $595.53 FREIGHT 148990 CONTEMPO COIN LAUNDRY $150.20 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 148991 CONTINENTAL EQUIPMENT&SUPPLY $332.98 TOOLS - 148992 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $4.175.15 ENGINE PARTS 148993 COSMOTRONIC $398.49 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 148994 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY &221.25 TRUCK PARTS 148995 COUNTERPART ENTERPRISES $123A7 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 148996 COUNTY INVESTMENTS II S125.20 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 148997 COUNTY CLERK $25.00 EXEMPTION FEE 148998 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $810.19 ELECTRIC PARTS 148999 CRAZY SHIRTS INC. $1.059.31 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 149000 CHARLES P.CROWLEY.CO. $588.01 INSTRUMENT PARTS 149001 SWRCB/SW FEES 81Q00O00 ANNUAL FEE-WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS 149002 SWRBC/BPTCP FEES 311,000.00 ANNUAL FEE-BAT PROTECTION&TOXIC CLEANUP 149003 DAMES&MOORE $8.000.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 149004 NA D'ARCY COMPANY $7,953.40 LAB SUPPLIES 149005 DE LE JON ENTERPRISES $191.65 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 149D0S DELL COMPUTER CORP $212.727.60 COMPUTERS 149007 DEPT OF MOTOR VEHICLES $12.00 DMV RENEWAL 149008 DERLANINC. $2.206.68 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 149009 THE DIAMOND GROUP $4,000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 149010 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $21,101.04 SERVICE AGREEMENTS 149011 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $793.30 PAINT SUPPLIES FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE IMV95 PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 1227/95 POSTING DATE 1227195 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 149012 DUALS SALES $382AS FITTINGS 149013 ESP NORTH $1,654.45 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 149014 ECOANALYSIS,INC. $1.950.50 CONSULTING SERVICES 149015 ECOSYSTEMS EN'G B ANALYSIS $11,739.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 149016 ELECT AIR TOOL CO $205.45 MECHANICAL PARTS 149017 ENCHANTER,INC. $3,500.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5.24-95 149018 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $21.97 FILTERS 149019 FIRST CHOICE $1,303.90 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT 149020 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $1,281.88 LAB SUPPLIES 149021 FISIONS INSTRUMENTS $98.93 SERVICE AGREEMENT 149022 FLICKINGER CO $1,615.11 VALVE 149023 FORD SAUVAJOT MANAGEMENT GROUP $1,995.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES T71 149024 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $71.56 PHOTO SUPPLIES X 149025 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $725.30 PAINT SUPPLIES ._.� 149026 FRYS ELECTRONICS $403.48 ELECTRONIC B COMPUTER SUPPLIES Cd 149027 FUJI TRU COLOR INC. $321.12 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 149028 GMF SOUND INC $29.40 ELECTRIC PARTS C7 149029 GST,INC. $11,309.77 OFFICE SUPPLIES 149030 GARDEN GROVE COMMUNITY CHURCH $1,724.04 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT W 149031 GEMINI INDUSTRIES $1,152.42 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 149032 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $3.989.07 ELECTRIC PARTS 149033 GENERAL OCEANICS,INC. $250.00 LAB SERVICES 149034 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $7,649.79 TELEPHONE SERVICES 149036 GERARD TILE CO.USA $4.077.41 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 149036 GIERLICH-MRCHELL,INC. $171.09 PUMP PARTS 149037 GOVT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOC. $50.00 AWARD FEE 149038 GOVERNMENT INSTITUTES INC $955.00 PUBLICATIONS 149039 GRAPHIC CONTROLS $235.46 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 149D40 GRASSY S.T.I. $3.096-51 ENGINE PARTS 149041 DGA CONSULTANTS $8.748.21 SURVEYING SERVICES M08.23-958 MO 6894 149042 DAVID R.GRIFFIN $117.774.55 LEGAL SERVICES-TECHITE PIPE M.0.9-14-94 149043 GULLWER'S INC. $410.78 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 149044 GUNTHER ATHLETIC SERVICE $100.70 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 14SO45 GEORGE T.HALL CO. $1,157.16 ELECTRIC PARTS 149046 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $1.356.14 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 149047 HATCH 8 KIRK,INC. $3.904.24 TRUCK PARTS 149048 HAWKINS ASSOCIATES $1.262.72 LAB EQUIPMENT 149049 PL HAWN CO,INC. $27.91 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 149050 HEALTH SCIENCE ASSOCIATES $1,750.0D PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 149051 HILTI,INC. $2,693.76 TOOLS 149052 HINCKLEY&SCHMITT $608.46 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 149053 HOERSIGER CVS CALIF.,INC. $43.21 COMPRESSOR PARTS 149054 HOLIDAY SPA HEALTH CUWB $2,565.47 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 149D55 HOME DEPOT $975.19 SMALL HARDWARE 149056 PIS HUGHES CO,INC. $607.02 PAINT SUPPLIES 149057 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO $2,009.25 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1221/95 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 1227/95 POSTING DATE 1227/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 149058 IPCO SAFETY $4.125.84 SAFETY SUPPLIES 149059 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $17.646.28 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.1 1-18-92 149060 INDUSTRIAL METAL SUPPLY CO. $956.48 STEEL 149061 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $157.12 CONNECTORS 149062 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. $71.61 TRUCK PARTS 149063 INORGANIC VENTURES $377.72 LAB SUPPLIES 149064 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $1,08T.06 BATTERIES 149065 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $7884 WATER USE 149066 IRVINE SCI-TECH BOOKS $52.47 PUBUCATIONS 149067 ISLANDER MOTEL $199.74 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 149068 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $160,88 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 149069 JAYS CATERING $485.75 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE m 149070 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $40.33 ELECTRIC PARTS = 149071 JONES CHEMICALS,INC. $18.401.96 SODIUM HYPOCHLORI'TE MO4-26-95 149072 AMERICAN METAL BEARING CO $175.01 BEARINGS b0 149073 KARS'ADVANCED MATERIALS,INC. $3,465.00 MACHINE TESTING 149074 KERRY CONSULTING GROUP $13.361.05 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MO II-15-95 149075 KIMMERLE BROS.INC. $/05.65 MECHANICAL PARTS C7 149076 KING BEARING,INC. $719.28 MACHINE SUPPLIES t 149077 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $6,625.39 TOOLS 149078 LA PAIMA INTER HOSPITAL $554.60 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 149079 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY CO. $62.83 SAFETY SUPPLIES 14908D LAUNDERLAND $90.38 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 149081 LAUNDERLAND $223.27 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 149082 LAUNDERLAND $205.77 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 149083 LEACH CORP $937.95 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 149094 LEE B RO CONSULTING ENGR. $30.450.73 ENGINEERING SERVICES MO 5-I2-93812-6-93 1490B5 K.P.LINDSTROM,INC. $2,335.07 ENVUL CONSULTING SERVICES MO 12.9-90 149086 MPS $468.56 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 14SD87 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $6621986.00 CONSTRUCTION P1-36-2 149068 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $84.013.00 CONSTRUCTION P2A2-2 149089 IRVINE MARMOT HOTEL 53.487.36 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 149M MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $335.61 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 149091 MES COMPANY $2.299.39 REPAIR 149092 MICEL INC $249.74 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 149093 MIDWAY MFG.B MACHINING $4,518.56 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 149M MISSION INDUSTRIES $4,063.80 UNIFORM RENTALS 149095 MITCHELL INTERNATIONAL INC $533.36 PUBLICATIONS 149D95 MOBILE HOSE AND HYDRAULIC $427.16 PUMP PARTS 149D97 THE MOBILE STORAGE GROUP $2.614.45 CARGO CONTAINER 14909E MOTEL 6 R0034-01-05-C $521.94 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 149099 MOTION INDUSTRIES,INC. $246.19 PUMP PARTS 149100 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $2,698.34 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 1491D1 NEWPORT HARBOR YACHT CLUB $117.17 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 149102 NEWARK ELECTRONICS $173.85 INSTRUMENT PARTS 149103 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $260.00 UTILITY SERVICE CONNECTION FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1221I95 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 1227I95 POSTING DATE 1227195 WARRANTNO. VENDOR AMOUNT 149104 NEWPORT CTR MEDICAL $243.95 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 149105 NICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY $8,765.94 LUBRICANTSIDIESEL FUEL 149106 NORTEL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS 5442.00 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS 149107 O'BRIEN ENERGY SYSTEMS $39,883.66 AUTOMATE GENERATORS 149108 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $385.13 SAFETY GLASSES 149109 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $1.356.03 OFFICE SUPPLIES 149110 OFFICE PAVILIONSINTERIOR RESOURCES $103,393.89 OFFICE FURNITURE REPAIRS 149111 OLD SPAGHETTI FACTORY $574.17 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 149112 OLYMPIC CONTROLS INC $89.95 REPAIR 149113 OMEGA CORPORATION $187.50 SECURITY SYSTEM REPAIRS 149114 ORANGE COUNTY FAIR&EXPO CTR $281.61 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT rn 149115 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $202.74 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES X 149116 ORANGE COURIER $222.75 COURIER SERVICES = 149117 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. $496.69 FITTINGS to 149118 ORRICK HERRINGTON&SUTCLIFFE $3,000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES W 1491 OXYGEN SERVICE $1, 6. SPECIALTY GASES 1d9120 20 COUNTY OF ORANGE $1 E75.0000 ADMINISTRATIVE FEES C7 149121 PSSI $1,969.65 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION 149122 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $1.232.66 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 149123 PACIFIC PARTS $32.728.92 INSTRUMENT PARTS 149124 PACIFIC BELL $1,389.72 TELEPHONE SERVICES 149125 PAK WEST $62.56 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 149126 PARAGON CABLE $62.56 CABLE SERVICES 149127 PARKER HANNIFIN 02 $2,979.60 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 149128 PARKHOUSE TIRE,INC. $830.55 TRUCK PARTS 149129 PARTS UNLIMITED $440.94 TRUCK PARTS 149130 R.F.PAULUS.INC. $15,175.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 149131 PEABODY $716.38 PUMP PARTS 149132 PEERLESS WIPING MATERIALS $721.93 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 149133 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $8,280.64 ROME.PETTY CASH,TRAINING&TRAVEL 149134 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $114,196.50 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3-29-95 149135 PINATA FOODS $2.736.41 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 149136 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS $1.920.00 CONSULTING SERVICES 149137 PITNEY BOWES $1.778.00 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS 149138 POLY ENTERPRISES INC $996.69 SAFETY 149139 POLYMETRICS,INC. $1,262.75 LAB SUPPLIES 141M40 POLYPURE,INC. $27.950.04 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92 149141 POWER SYSTEMS TESTING CO. $1.249.00 ELECTRIC PARTS 149142 PROJECT MGMT INSTITUTE(PMI) $156.75 PUBLICATIONS 149143 PROMINENT FLUID CONTROL,INC. $799.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 149144 PUBLIC FINANCIAL MGMT.,INC. $10.906.50 FINANCIAL CONSULTING SERVICES MO 7.31.95 149145 PRYOR REPORT $195.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING 149146 PUMPING SOLUTIONS $577.24 PUMP PARTS 149147 QUIP LAMINATES,INC. $1.387.82 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 149148 QUESTRON CORP. $680.00 LAB SUPPLIES 149149 RD SYSTEMS $75.00 MONITOR REPAIR FUND NO 9199 - H DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 12/21/95 PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 12/27/95 POSTING DATE 12/27/95 WARRANT NO. 149150 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $1,570.38 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS 149151 R&R INSTRUMENTS $83.35 ELECTRIC PARTS 149152 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO. $153.03 LAB SUPPLIES 149153 RAYNE WATER SYSTEMS E824.59 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 149154 REBIS $1,811.73 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 149156 RED WING SHOES $113.78 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 149156 REMEDYTEMP $962.37 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 149157 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $1,569.00 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 149158 RENOLD INC. $657.03 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 149159 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $622.53 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 149160 BASCO ELECTRIC $6.255.00 CONTRACT SERVICES 149161 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTL $82.779.65 OCEAN MONITORING NO 6-6-94&MO 6-29-95 m 149162 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $100.35 SPECIALTY GASES X 149163 SCOTT WILLIAM J. $317.07 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 2 149164 SEA COAST DESIGNS $937.43 LAB SUPPLIES tz 149165 CITY OF SEAL BEACH $376.60 WATER USE 149166 SELECTCIRCUITS 5801.46 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 149167 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $792.40 TOOLS p 149168 SHEPARD BROTHERS $540.76 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 149169 SHURELUCK SALES $8.025.D5 TOOLS/HARDWARE 149170 SIEMON,LARSEN,&MARSH $6.497.08 CONTRACT SERVICE 149171 SMITH-EMERY CO. $912.00 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-13�94 149172 THE SMITH GROUP 55,213.00 CONTRACT SERVICE 149173 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. 545,782.30 POWER 149174 SO.CAL GAS.CO. $22.514.64 NATURAL GAS 149175 SOUTHWEST WHOLESALE NURSERY $19,650.00 CONTRACT SERVICE 149176 STAMEN Z SPASSOFF P.E. $12,000.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 149177 SPICERS PAPER $91.29 OFFICE SUPPLIES 149178 STARNA CELLS,INC. $533.66 LAB SUPPLIES 149179 STATEK CORP $2.160.04 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 149180 SUMMIT STEEL $962.64 METAL 149181 SUNSET ENVIRONMENTAL $1.207.14 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 149182 SUPELCO,INC. $223.49 LAB SUPPLIES 149183 SUPER ICE CORP. $80.22 LAB SUPPLIES 149184 SUPER POWER PRODUCTS $517.20 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 149185 SUPER SOLDER SERVICES $110.71 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 149186 SYSTEMS 81O INDUSTRIES INC. $104.68 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 149181 SYMCAS $2.436.25 CONSULTANT 149188 TCH ASSOCIATES $3,292.22 LAB SUPPLIES 149189 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $1.002.62 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 149190 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $701.31 MECHANICAL PARTS 149191 TIME MOTION TOOLS $86.76 TOOLS 149192 TOLO INC 5555.23 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 149193 TONYS LOCK&SAFE SERVICE $167.95 LOCKS&KEYS 149194 TRAFFIC CONTROL ENGINEERING $1,440.00 ENGINEERING SERVICE 149195 TRISTAR $220.21 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE IMI/95 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 12/27/95 POSTING DATE 12/27/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR 149196 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $260.04 TRUCK PARTS 149197 TRUCK PARTS SUPPLY $28.11 TRUCK PARTS 149198 TRUESDAIL LABS $65.00 LAB SERVICES 149199 JG TUCKER S SON,INC. $4,669.35 INSTRUMENT PARTS 149200 TUSTIN DODGE $123.85 TRUCK PARTS 149201 TWINING LABORATORIES $13,595.07 S0IL TESTING M.O.7-13-94 149202 U.S.AUTO GLASS CENTERS $29.95 TRUCK PARTS 149203 US POSTAL SERVICE $132.41 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 149204 US POSTAL SERVICE $143.23 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 149205 US POSTAL SERVICE $130.29 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 149206 USPOSTALSERVICE $448.20 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 149207 UNIS0URCEWOR BUTLER PAPER $336.40 OFFICE SUPPLIES 149208 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $583.33 PARCEL SERVICES Rl 149209 VWR SCIENTIFIC 5443.53 LAB SUPPLIES = 149210 VAUN CORPORATION $644.09 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES '--' 149211 VILLAGE NURSERIES $43.08 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES to 149212 VORTEX INDUSTRIES 5325.24 BUILDING REPAIRS -1 149213 WACKENHUT CORP. $7,193.76 CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS rj 149214 WARNER CENTER ASSOCIATION $204.57 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 1 149215 WARRINGTON $17.50 SERVICE AGREEMENT V 149216 WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION $1.473.68 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT COURSES 149217 WECO INDUSTRIES,INC. $13.954.40 CHEMICALS 149218 WESTERN SKIES MOBILE HOME PARK $250.84 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 149219 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $17.665.35 CAUSTIC SODA MO 8-23-95 149220 WESTERN SWITCHES $65.40 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 149221 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $232.20 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 149222 WESCO $2.386.30 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 149223 JUDITH A.OLSON $72.54 REIMBURSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE 149224 WINONICS(BREA) $237.60 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 149225 WOLFE AND ASSOCIATES,INC. $1.305.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 149226 ROURKE,WOODRUFF&SPRADLIN $76.348.05 LEGAL SERVICES MO 7.26-95 149227 XEROX CORP. $195.05 COPIER LEASES 149228 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $715.83 LAB SUPPLIES 149229 ZYMARK CORP. $179.14 LAB EQUIPMENT TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 12/27/95 $2,628,999.39 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1221/95 PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 1227195 POSTING DATE 1227/95 SUMMARY AMOUNT #1 OPER FUND $3,000.00 #2 OPER FUND $84.76 #2 CAP FAC FUND $1,028.74 #3 OPER FUND $18,259.97 #3 CAP FAC FUND $129.533.26 #5 OPER FUND $648.54 #6 CAP FAC FUND $62.31 #7 OPER FUND $2.598.94 97 CAP FAC FUND $40,020.76 #11 OPER FUND $11,119.84 rn X #11 CAP FAC FUND $97,260.00 _ #14 OPER FUND $291.50 .-� 014 CAP FAC FUND $19.650.00 --- #586 OPER FUND $16.75 --I #588 CAP FAC FUND E25,585.05 I7 #687 OPER FUND $211.28 1 #78140PER FUND $15.83 00 JT OPER FUND $747,037.33 CORF $1,311,228.69 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $9,225.20 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $212.140.44 $2,628,999.39 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 01/05196 PAGE1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 01/10/96 POSTING DATE 01/10/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 149258 AGTECHCOMPANY $59,271.65 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10.9.91 149259 ARK TECHNOLOGIES $6,000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 149260 A-Z LOGIC SYSTEMS $66.80 LAB SUPPLIES 149261 ACORN CONSULTING $2,795.00 CONSULTING SERVICES 149262 AIR COLD SUPPLY,INC. $29.21 AIR CONDITIONER REPAIRS 149263 AIR PRODUCTS B CHEMICALS $18.322.00 08M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.O.8-9-09 149264 ALADDIN HOUSE $623.90 WINDOWBUNDS 149265 AMERIDATA $4.851.11 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 149266 AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION $320.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 149267 ANIXTER-DISTRIBUTION $722.58 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 149268 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $1,714.01 NOTICES 8 ADS 149269 APPLE ONE $704.00 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES m 149270 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $37,523.94 COMPUTER PARTS X 149271 ARROWHEAD ELECTRIC CORP. $236.32 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES s 149272 E S BABCOCK 8 SONS INC $1,110.00 LAB ANALYSIS 149273 BANK OF AMERICA $393.42 BANKING CHARGES .. 149274 BARNES 8 NOBLE BOOKS $800.00 TECHNICAL PUBLICATIONS 149275 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $1.016.00 BATTERIES m 149276 BAUER COMPRESSOR $8.020.30 COMPRESSOR PARTS 1 1492" BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $4,213.99 LAB SUPPLIES F-+ 149278 BEAR STATE PUMP 8 EQUIPMENT $108.21 PUMP PARTS 149279 A BIEDERMAN INC $944.81 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 149280 BIO-GRO DIVISION 542,435.61 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 4-26-95 149281 BONA-RUES $140.18 TRUCK PARTS 149292 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $13,2D8.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES MO 1-12-94 149283 BNI BOOKS $869.51 BOOKS 149284 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH INC. $206.84 LAB SUPPLIES 149285 CALTROL,INC. $574.56 HARDWARE 149286 CALIF ASSOC.OF SAN.AGENCIES $495.00 REGISTRATION 149287 CALTEX PLASTICS,INC. $228.40 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 149288 CAMALI CORP. $400.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 149289 CANUS CORPORATION $54.641.10 FIBER OPTIC CABLE 149290 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $21,574.15 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-33.2,PI-38&P2.43 149291 CASIRUSCOINC. $605.06 SAFETY SUPPLIES 149292 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $1.214.79 OFFICE FURNITURE 149293 CERFNET $37.40 COMPUTER SERVICES 149294 CHEMWEST INC. $5.00 REFUND MAIL FEES 149295 CLARKE CONTRACTING CO $42,682.50 CONSTRUCTION 7-04-2 149296 COUCH AND SONS $68.796.90 CONSTRUCTION M-044 149297 COUCH B SONS $122,640.00 CONSTRUCTION 11A7.1 149298 COMMUNICATION DEV.ASSOC. $2,250.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 149299 COMMUNICATIONS PERFORMANCE GROUP $17,850.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 149300 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $2.639.88 PUMP PARTS 149301 COMPUSERVE $166.13 COMPUTER SERVICES 149302 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $2.469.09 ELECTRIC PARTS 149303 CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS $131.33 FREIGHT FUND NO 9199 IT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 01105199 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER M43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 01/10M POSTING DATE 01/10/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 149304 CONTINENTAL LAB PRODUCTS INC. $3.088.81 LAB SUPPLIES 149305 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $951.71 ENGINE PARTS 149306 CHARLES P.CROWLEY,CO. $19.08 INSTRUMENT PARTS 149307 DAVE'S BICYCLES,INC. 53N.22 BIKE REPAIRS 149308 DELL COMPUTER CORP. SM.100.32 COMPUTER PARTS 149309 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $6,941.49 ANALYST 149310 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $1.035.69 PAINT SUPPLIES 149311 DUALS SALES $282.49 FITTINGS 149312 E.C.S. 8344.00 PUBLICATIONS 149313 ESP NORTH $473.17 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 149314 EASTMAN.INC. $3,265.49 OFFICE SUPPLIES 149315 EDWARDS HIGH VACUUM INTER $134.88 LAB SUPPLIES 149316 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $867.70 LAB SERVICES m 149317 FMC CORPORATION $91,487.40 HYDROGEN PEROXIDE MO 9.14-94 = 149318 FASTFRAME OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $139.00 AWARDS FRAMING ^-' 149319 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $220.70 AIR FREIGHT 149320 FILTERLINE CORP. $613.25 FILTERS '-4 149321 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $257.54 FILTERS Rl 149322 FIRST CO B/OR NORTHERN DIST. $525.99 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 1 149323 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $943.10 LAB SUPPLIES N 149324 FISONS INSTRUMENTS $11,772.61 LAB SOFTWARE LICENSES 149325 CUFFORDA FORKERT 78,14&50 SURVEYING SERVICES MO 64495 149326 FRY'S ELECTRONICS $394.14 ELECTRONIC 8 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 149327 GST,INC. $18.680.59 OFFICE SUPPLIES 149328 GARRATT-CALIAHAN COMPANY $71.12 CHEMICALS 149329 GAUGE REPAIR SERVICE $368.58 INSTRUMENT PARTS 149330 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $137.87 ELECTRIC PARTS 149331 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1,124.81 TELEPHONE SERVICES 149332 GIERLICH-MITCHELL,INC. $8.366.81 PUMP PARTS 149333 GOV'T CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENT $250.00 REGISTRATION 149334 WAN GRAINGER.INC. $191.24 COMPRESSOR PARTS 149335 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $422.08 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 149338 GRASSY S.T.I. $4,282.76 ENGINE PARTS 149337 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC WHOLESALE $456.89 PLANT AUTOMATION 149336 DGA CONSULTANTS $18,617.15 SURVEYING SERVICES MO 8.23.958 MO 6-&94 149339 HACH COMPANY $1,077.84 LAB SUPPLIES 149340 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $1.480.00 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 149341 WATCH 8 KIRK,INC. $1.265.99 TRUCK PARTS 149342 PL HAWN CO,INC. $878.40 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 149343 HELPMATES PERSONNEL SERVICES $802.56 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 149344 VICKI HESTON PERSONNEL SERVICE $8,384.42 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 149345 HILTI,INC. $1,664.08 TOOLS 149346 HOERBIGER CVS CALIF.,INC. $271.92 COMPRESSOR PARTS 149347 HOLMES B NARVER,INC. 319,585AI ENGINEERING SERVICES2-14-5112 M09-14-94 149348 HOME DEPOT $365.16 SMALL HARDWARE 149349 SOUTHWEST SCIENTIFIC,INC. $1,480.49 METER PARTS FUND NO 9199 - IT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 01/05/96 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 01l10l96 POSTING DATE 01110M WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 14935D RS HUGHES CO,INC. $1.073.50 PAINT SUPPLIES 149351 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $18,639.75 WATER USE 149352 HYCLONE LABORATORIES INC. $910.66 LAB SUPPLIES 149353 HYDROTEX INC. $1,532.15 TRANSMISSION FLUID 149354 IPCO SAFETY $1.435.91 SAFETY SUPPLIES 149355 INDUSTRIAL STEAM $1,393.38 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 149356 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $5.54 WATER USE 149357 JAMISON ENGINEERING $8,361.90 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 149356 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $836.57 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 149359 JAY'S CATERING $461.54 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE 149360 JOBS AVAILABLE 9170.00 NOTICES B ADS 149361 JOHNSON CONTROLS INC. $956.32 ELECTRIC PARTS m 149362 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $825.13 ELECTRIC PARTS X 149363 JONES CHEMICALS,INC. $4,992.76 SODIUM 14YPOCHLORITE MO4-2&95 149364 KALLEEN'S COMPUTER PRODUCTS $331.50 COMPUTER SUPPLIES W 149366 FRANCES L.KALUZNY $1,320.00 HUMAN RESOURCES CONSULTANT 149365 KEMIRON PACIFIC,INC. $66.867.24 FERRIC CHLORIDE M09-27-95 149367 KING BEARING,INC. $984.51 MACHINE SUPPLIES m 149360 KLEINFELDER $194.85 GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTING SERVICES IN 149369 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $6.970.00 TOOLS 149370 LEADERSHIP DIRECTORIES INC. $620.25 SUBSCRIPTIONS 149371 LEE 8 RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC. $4.582.08 ENGINEERING SERVICES 149372 LEWCO ELECTRIC $162.19 TRUCK PARTS 149373 SOCO-LYNCH CORP. $537.03 JANITORIAL SERVICES 149374 MEC ANALYTICAL SYSTEMS INC. $9,968.00 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 149375 MPS $926.22 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 149376 MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY CORP. $887.22 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 149377 MARATHON ELECTRIC $745.05 ELECTRIC PARTS 149378 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $399.25 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 149379 MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. $732.56 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 149380 MIDWAY MFG.8 MACHINING $875.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 149381 MISSION INDUSTRIES $2.379.41 UNIFORM RENTALS 149382 MORTON SALT $1,042.22 SALT 149383 MOTION INDUSTRIES,INC. $227.25 PUMP PARTS 149384 NATIONAL INFORMATION DATA $503.95 PUBLICATION 149385 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $82.11 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 1493M NEWARK ELECTRONICS $58.69 INSTRUMENT PARTS 149387 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $40.58 WATER USE 149388 91 EXPRESS LANES $970.00 TRANSPONDERS 8 DEPOSIT 149389 OFFICIAL AIRLINE GUIDE $549.80 SUBSCRIPTIONS 149390 OLSTEN STAFFING SERVICES $3.472.00 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 149391 ON-LINE EKECTRONICS $83.80 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 149392 ON TECHNOLOGY 360740 SOFTWARE 149393 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $339.27 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES ' 149394 ORANGE COURIER $89.10 COURIER SERVICES 149395 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. $1,208.19 FITTINGS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 01105196 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 01/10196 POSTING DATE 01/10/96 WARRANT NO, VENDOR AMOUNT 149396 OXYGEN SERVICE $1,281.88 SPECIALTY GASES 149397 COUNTY OF ORANGE $60.00 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICE FEES 149398 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $18.647.75 WORKERS COMP REIMBURSEMENT 149399 COUNTY OF ORANGE $238BD INSPECTION LABOR 149400 PACIFIC PARTS $63,598.08 INSTRUMENT PARTS 149401 PACIFIC BELL $15.66 TELEPHONE SERVICES 149402 PAINEWEBBER $61.394.69 COP REMARKETING FEES 149403 PARAGON CABLE $36.78 CABLE SERVICES 14MN COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $2,240.41 REIMB.PETTY CASH,TRAINING&TRAVEL 149405 PHOTRON USA $917.27 LAB SUPPLIES 149406 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $104,986.80 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3-29-95 149407 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS $19,433.31 CONSULTING SERVICE m 149408 POLYPURE,INC. $23.376.47 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3.11-92 X 149409 POWER DESIGN $943.90 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS z 149410 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $112.00 ICE FOR SAMPLES w 149411 PUMPING SOLUTIONS INC $808.90 PUMPS 149412 PUTZMEISTER,INC. $647.97 PUMP PARTS 149413 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $154 96 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS Rl 149414 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $2.062.75 TRASH REMOVAL r 149415 RED WING SHOES $282.74 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 149418 REMEDY TEMP E2,875.32 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 149417 RM MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL ANDIOR RRTAL $261.14 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 149418 RODNEY-HUNT CO $8,264.43 HEADWORKS REPAIR 149419 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $847.56 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 149420 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $196.05 TOOLS 149421 SHURELUCK SALES $5,363.81 TOOLS/HARDWARE 149422 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO. $197.84 LAB SUPPLIES 149423 SO COAST AIR QUALITY $15,65C92 PERMIT FEES 149424 SOUTH COAST WATER $160.00 LAB SUPPLIES 149425 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. $61.180.65 POWER 149426 SO.CALIFORNIA MARINE INST. $800.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 149427 STANG INDUSTRIAL PRODS. $638.66 HARDWARE 149428 STARRA CELLS,INC. $973.86 LAB SUPPLIES 149429 STATE STREET BANK $4,842.92 COP TRUSTEE SERVICES 149430 SUNSET INDUSTRIAL PARTS $271.87 PUMP PARTS 149431 SUPELCO,INC. $223.41 LAB SUPPLIES 149432 SUPER CHEM CORP. $1,338.85 CHEMICALS 149433 SUPER POWER PRODUCTS $362.04 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 149434 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $98.39 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 149435 TECHNOMIC PUBLISHING CO. $292.00 PUBLICATIONS 149436 TELEDYNE ANALYTICAL $3,566.92 INSTRUMENT PARTS 149437 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $569.89 MECHANICAL PARTS 149438 TONYS LOCK&SAFE SERVICE $198.96 LOCKS&KEYS 149439 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $165AI TRUCK PARTS 149440 TRUCK PARTS SUPPLY $224.43 TRUCK PARTS 149441 JG TUCKER B SON,INC. $11,234.19 INSTRUMENT PARTS FUND NO 9199 - H DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 01/05IN PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 01110/96 POSTING DATE 01I10196 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 149442 UNISOURCEWOR BUTLER PAPER $1,076.26 OFFICE SUPPLIES 149443 VWR SCIENTIFIC $524.97 LAB SUPPLIES 149444 VARIAN ASSOCIATES INC $643.96 LAB SUPPLIES 149446 VOSSLER B COMPANY $266.63 VALVE PARTS 149446 WACKENHUT CORP. $8,996.51 CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS 149447 WAL-CON CONSTRUCTION CO. $78,194AI CONSTRUCTION 6-37-3 149448 WAXIE $2.051.99 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 149449 WECO INDUSTRIES,INC. $14.083.16 CHEMICAL SUPPLIES 149450 WEST COAST INSTRUMENTS -$247.46 GAUGE 149451 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $20.907.15 CAUSTIC SODA MO 8.23-95 149452 WEST-UTE SUPPLY CO. $3.547.66 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 149453 WESCO $441.10 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 149454 JUDITH A.WILSON $89.09 REIMBURSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE m 149455 XEROX CORP. 5994.02 COPIER LEASES X 149456 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $91329 LAB SUPPLIES .s.., 149457 JOHNSON YOKOGAWA CORP. 52,635.99 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES CV TOTAL CLAIMS PAID IIIGM8 $1,510,W8.32 m FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 01/05196 PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 01MOM POSTING DATE 01110MS SUMMARY AMOUNT #1 OPER FUND $1,469.38 #1 CONSTR FUND $8.069.26 #2 OPER FUND $6.426.02 #2 CAP FAC FUND $19.585.61 #2 CONSTR FUND $20.620.74 #3 OPER FUND $48,363.12 #3 CAP FAC FUND $2.820.00 93 CONSTR FUND $18.782.13 05 OPER FUND $13,657.87 #5 CONSTR FUND $4,350.51 #6 OPER FUND $374.37 fTt #6 CONSTR FUND $2,218.96 X 07 OPER FUND $3.893.57 2 #7 CAP FAC FUND $42,700.00 W #7 CONSTR FUND $4.079.87 #11 OPER FUND $1,371.72 --1 #11 CAP FAC FUND $126,302.73 m #11 CONSTR FUND $2.749.26 1 #13 OPEN FUND $78.60 #13 CONSTR FUND $76.15 #14 CAP FAC FUND $17.60 #14 CONSTR FUND $447.92 9586 OPER FUND $2,653.22 #596 CAP FAC FUND $78.194.11 #687 OPER FUND $1.960.71 #7814 OPER FUND $5.169.95 H OPER FUND $590,252.64 CORP $200.472.07 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $18.647.75 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $225.832.68 $1,510,838.32 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES STRATEGIC PLANNING WORKSHOP JANUARY 27, 1996 RICTS OFp9gd rs a c z � � a cI�NO THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 ROLL CALL A Strategic Planning Workshop of Me Boards of Directors of County Samollon Districts Nos.1,2,3, 5,6,7,11.13 and 14 of Orange County,California,was hold on January 27,1996.at 9:00 am.,In the DisMM'Adminis"tve Offices. Following Me Pledge of Alleglence and Mvecallon Me roll was called and Me Secretary reported a Quorum present for DWricts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7,13.and 14 as follows: ACTT E ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO.1: _x Pal McGuigan,Chair _ Tad R.Moreno x James M.Ferryman,Chair pro tam Arthur Perry x Mark A,Murphy _ Joanne Coon2 Thomas R.Seherelll Jim Polls Roper Stanton 3_ Wil6em G.Steiner DISTRICT NO.2: x John Collins,Chair _ George Soon �. Daniel T.Welch,Chair pro tam John M.Gullocion x Barry Derres _ Bob Bell x Bumle Dunlap _ Glenn Parker x Norman Z.Eckenroda Carol Downey x James H.Flora Slew Anderson x Pal McGuigan Ted R.Moreno g Mark A.Murphy Joanne Coonh Chns No" _L Dan Bankhead x Shedon Singer George L.Mount Roger Stanton x William G.Steiner _a Bob Zemel _ Tom Daly DISTRICT NO.3: g Sal A.Sapien,Chair Harry M.Dotson _x Sumle Dunlap,Chair pro tam Glenn Parker _a Waller Bowman Gall Kerry x George Brown Madlyn Bruce HasEng6 x John Collins George Soon x James H.Flora _ Steve Anderson x Don R.Griffin Pelsy Marshall a Vision Leipzig Ralph Bauer x Wally Linn E.G.Miner x Pat McGuigan Ted R.Morena CMfa Norby _x Don Bankhead _x Margie L.Rice _ James V.Ewns x Sheldon Singer George L.Zlaket Roger Wanton _x Wiliam G.Steiner _a Chad"Sylvia Robert Wahabom a Bob Zonal _ Tom Daly DISTRICT NO.5: x Jan Debay,Chair John C.Cox.Jr. x Wiliam G.Stainer,Chair pro tam _ Roger Stanton x John C.Cox,Jr. Jan Dabey DISTRICT NO.6: x James M.Ferrymen,Chair AM.,Perry _x Jan Debay.Chair pro tam _ John C.Cox,Jr. x William G.Steiner Roper Wanton DISTRICT NO.7: a Barry Hammond,Chair Mke Ward a Thomas R.Seharelti Jim Pots _x Jan Debey _ John C.Co.,Jr. x James M.Ferrymen,Chair pro tam _ Arthur Perry x Pet McGuigan _ Ted R.Moreno x Mark A.Murphy Joanne Coon x William G.Steiner Roper Mention DISTRICT NO.11: a Victor Leipzig,Chair Ralph Bauer _.a Shiley Dettloff,Chair pro tam Ralph Bauer Roper Stanton x William G.Steiner DISTRICT NO.13: x Jahn M.GUII®on,Clal Daniel T Welch a Bob Zemel,Chair pro tam _ Tom Daly x Burns Dunlap Glenn Parker x Me*A.Murphy Joanne Coomz _x William G.Steiner Roger Clanton DISTRICT NO.14: a Thomas R.Sagerelll,Chair Jim Poll x Mark A.Murphy,Chair pro tam _ Joanne ComR a Barry Hammond _ Mks Wand x_ William G.Steiner Roger Stanton i Peer A Swan _ Danel Wier 2 01/27/96 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Don McIntyre, General Manager, Blake P. Anderson, Assistant General Manager- Operations, Judith A. Wilson, Assistant General Manager-Administration, Penny Kyle, Board Secretary, Tom Dawes, Gary Hasenstab, Irwin Haydock, Ed Hodges, Steve Kozak, David Ludwin, Patrick McNally, Greg Mathews, Bob Ooten, Mike Moore, George Robertson, Gary Streed, Michelle Tuchman, Nancy Wheatley, Mike White OTHERS PRESENT: Jerry King, George Zlaket, Alternate Director, Harry M. Dotson, Alternate Director, Mary Lee, Gail P. Lynch, John Bushman, Don Schulz, Sam Kelly, Nancy Gardner, Bob Caustin, Lindell Marsh, Larry Porter, John D. Knoll, Jr., Chris Crometon, Bill Whittenberg, Bob Finn DISTRICT 7 Appointment of Chair pro tern In the absence of Chair Barry Hammond and Chair pro tem Thomas R. Saltarelli, Director James M. Ferryman was appointed Chair pro tem of District No. 7. DISTRICT 11 Adiournment of meeting due to lack ofguorurn This 27th day of January, 1996, at 9:00 a.m., being the time and place for the Strategic Planning Workshop of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, and there not being a quorum present in District No. 11, the meeting of said District was thereupon adjourned by the Secretary. DISTRICTS 1, 2, 3. 5. 6. 7. 13 & 14 Strategic Planning Program Joint Chair Cox welcomed all who attended the first quarterly Strategic Planning Workshop and gave a brief summary of what would be covered in the presentation. Jerry King of the Regional Water Quality Control Board was then introduced. He reviewed critical policy issues facing the Districts and his view from a regional perspective. Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager of Operations, gave a historical perspective report; Judy Wilson, Assistant General Manager of Administration, spoke on demographic issues; Nancy Wheatley, Director of Technical Services, reported on the 301(h) waiver; Dave Ludwin, Director of Engineering, spoke on the Strategic Plan overview; and, Don McIntyre, General Manager, spoke on strategic and policy issues. 3 `v COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1 , 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 , 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES ADJOURNED MEETING FEBRUARY 14, 1996 %Us 0F�9q? G > Z 2 K V � ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 ROLL CALL An adjourned meeting of Me Boards of Directions of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1.2,3, 5,6, 7. 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California,was held on Febmary 14, 1996,at 7:30 p.m.,in the Districts'Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll Was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2. 3, 5, 6, 7. 11, 13.and 14 as follows: ACTME ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO.1: a Pat McGuigan, Clair _ Ted R.Moreno James M.Ferryman,Clair pro tern _ Amur Perry y Mark A.Murphy _ Joarme Coon 1 Thomas R.Si Jim Potts y Roper Sermon William G.Steiner DISTRICT NO.2: i John C4IIim, Cair George Scott DBNd T.Welch.Clair pro tam x Jolm M.Gdlixsan Z Bury Danes Bob Bell Z BlvNe Dunlop Glenn Ranter Norman Z. Eckenmdo Carol Downey _L James H. Ron Stove Anderson i Pat McGuigan Ted R.Menem Mark A.Murphy Joanne Co. Chris Neoy Dan BankMad �. Sheldon Singer Geinya L Zlaket i Raper Sermon Wgiam B.Stainer J_ Bob 2em0 _ Tom Daly MUM=NO,3: Sal A.Sapien,Clair Harry M.Dorton 3� Burnie D o,Chair pro tem Glenn Pukor Z Walter Bowman Gail Kern/ Z George Brown Marilyn Bruce Hamirgs Z John Collis George Soon x James H.Fba Steva Anderson Don R.Griffin Peery Marshall Z Victor temple Ralph Bauer Z Wally Linn Ea G.Miner y Per McGuigan _ To K Moreno _I_ Chris honey Don BBNuhoBd y Marcie L Rice _ James V.&am _L Sheldon Singer Gorge L.Zlakm J_ Roger Swum Wiliam G.Steiner • Charls Svh`W Ruben Ward". 1 Bob Zemel Tom Daly DISTRICT NO.6: i Jon Delay,Clair John C.Cm,Jr. a Wiliam G.Stei er,Clair pro rem _ Roper Stamen John C.Co.,Jr. _ Jan Debay DISTRICT NO.6: �.5� Jams M,Ferryman,Clair _ Arthur Perry .L. Jan Delay.Clair pro tem _ John C.Cox,Jr. 1. Wlliem G.Sumner _ Roper Stanton DISTRICT NO.7: i Barry Hammond,Clair _ Mike Wind Thomas R.Saharelli,Clair pro tem _ J'un Ports Jan Delay _ John C.Co..Jr. x James M.Ferrymen _ Amer Perry i Pet McGuigan _ To R.Mmano 1 Mark A.Murphy _ Joanne Caen William G.Steiner _ Roper Stamen DISTRICT NO.11: Victor Leong,Clair _ Ralph Bauer Shifty Depoff,Chair pro tan _ Ralph Bauer Roger Star an _ William G.Steiner DISTRICT NO. 13: John M.Gullixwn, Chair _ Damel T.Welch g Bob Zemel,Clair pre tam _ Tom Daly Bums DuNap _ G den Pinker 1 Mark A.Murphy _ Joenm Coon t_ Wiliam G.Steiner _ Roper Sermon DISTRICT NO. 14: a Thomas R.spheres.Chair _ Jim Potts a Mark A.Murphy _ J..Coon Barry Hammond.Clair pro tern _ Mike Wind g WIonh G.Steiner _ Roper Suntan i Peer A.Swan _ Darryl Miller -2- v1 2/14/96 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Don McIntyre, General Manager, Blake P. Anderson, Assistant General Manager-Operations, Judith A Wilson, Assistant General Manager-Administration, Penny Kyle, Board Secretary, Cymantha Atkinson, Janet Gray, Gary Hasenstab, Irwin Haydock, Ed Hodges, Terri Josway, Steve Kozak, Greg Mathews, Pat McNally, Mike Moore, Bob Ooten, Mike Peterman, Gary Streed, Jean Tappan, Michelle Tuchman, Nancy Wheatley, Mike While OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Chip Clements, Michael Ozawa, Jon Scholz, George Zlaket, Alt. Director DISTRICT 14 Appointment of Chair Pro tem In the absence of Chair Thomas R. Saltarelli and Chair pro tem Mark A. Murphy, Director Barry Hammond was appointed Chair pro tern of District No. 14. ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file draft minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re Landfill Issues Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the draft minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re Landfill Issues meeting held on January 31, 1996, be, and are hereby, received and filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors concur with the actions of the Ad Hoc Committee re Landfill Issues to consider a Term Sheet at an Adjourned Meeting on February 14, 1996. ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file letter from Vicki Wilson of Intearated Waste Manaoement Department. County of Oranae. dated January 31. 1996 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the letter dated January 31, 1996, from Vicki Wilson of the Integrated Waste Management Department, County of Orange, regarding the proposed Resolution of Application to the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO), be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. -3- 01/27/96 DISTRICT 1 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 11:35 a.m. DISTRICT 2 Journment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 11:35 a.m. DISTRICT 3 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 11:35 a.m. DISTRICT 5 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 11:35 a.m. DISTRICT 6 Adiournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 11:35 a.m. DISTRICT 7 Adioumment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 11:35 a.m. 4 olrz7/96 DISTRICT 13 Adournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 11:35 a.m. DISTRICT 14 BQjoumment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 11:35 a.m. A�- a Secretary oft oar of Directors of County Sant tion si ricts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 13, and 14 J:%WPDOC%BSWIN9M12M 5 'v 2/14/96 ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file letter from Director Bob Zemel dated February 13, 1996 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the letter dated February 13, 1996, from Director Bob Zemel, requesting that the acquisition of the County of Orange Integrated Waste Management System be continued until the Joint Boards have had adequate time for analysis, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Actions re Proposed acquisition of County of Orange Integrated Waste Management System Verbal report and Presentation Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager of Operations, with the use of slides reported in depth on the landfill acquisition. The Floor was then opened for discussion. Receive and file Staff Report dated February 7. 1996 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Staff Report dated February 7, 1996, regarding proposed acquisition of County of Orange Solid Waste Management System, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Directors John M. Gullixson, Victor Leipzig, Norman Z. Eckenrode, and Jan Debay requested that their opposition to the motion be made a matter of record. -4- 2r14196 Approve a Memorandum of Understanding Re Proposed Terms and Conditions for Acauisition and Sale of County of Orange Solid Waste Management System and Facilities Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Memorandum of Understanding Re Proposed Terms and Conditions for Acquisition and Sale of County of Orange Solid Waste Management System and Facilities, to include the following, be, and is hereby, approved: (1) Offer to acquire all existing assets and liabilities of the 5 operating and 20 closed landfills owned and operated by the Integrated Waste Management Department of the County of Orange to include cash reserves of approximately$114 million, an environmental fund of approximately$28 million, and debts of approximately $82 million; and, (2) Provide acquisition terms of$300 million payable in 40 semiannual installments of$7.5 million, for 20 years; and, (3) Conditions the offer upon the Sanitation Districts receiving waste flow control agreements from the cities and sanitary districts representing 90% of the solid waste generated within Orange County by the closing date of the offer; and, (4) Establishes a closing date of June 30, 1996, or 60 days following acceptance and approval by the Board of Supervisors, whichever is later; and, (5) Other technical terms and conditions. Directors John M. Gullixson, Victor Leipzig, Norman Z. Eckenrode, and Jan Debay requested that their opposition to the motion be made a matter of record. -5- �V 2/14/96 Authorizing the General Manager to submit to the County Board of Supervisors a Memorandum of Understanding Proposing Terms and Conditions for Acquisition and Sale of County of Oranae Solid Waste Manaaement System and Facilities Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to submit to the County Board of Supervisors a Memorandum of Understanding Proposing Terms and Conditions for Acquisition and Sale of County of Orange Solid Waste Management System and Facilities, in form approved by General Counsel. Directors John M. Gullixson, Victor Leipzig, Norman Z. Eckenrode, and Jan Debay requested that their opposition to the motion be made a matter of record. Authorizing the General Manger to oreoare a comprehensive Request for Proposals to provide contract operational services Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to prepare a comprehensive Request for Proposals from qualified firms for providing contract operational services for all on-site operational, maintenance and field engineering activities at the five operating landfills, and to provide said Request for Proposals to the Joint Boards at a future meeting for approval prior to issuance. Directors John M. Gullixson, Norman Z. Eckenrode, and Jan Debay requested that their opposition to the motion be made a matter of record. ALL DISTRICTS General Counsel's comments Prior to Closed Session General Counsel reported to the Directors the need for a closed session and to add one item needing immediate action that arose subsequent to the publication of the agenda. He reported that additional items could be added pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2(b) upon a two-thirds vote of the Directors. No other items would be discussed or acted upon. -6- 2/14/96 ALL DISTRICTS Add Item to Closed Session Agenda Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Item No. 9(b)(1) be added to the agenda to consider a report from General Counsel in connection with the litigation entitled Sebastian Serrantino v. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 737044 (Government Code Section 54956.9[a)). ALL DISTRICTS Convene in Closed Session pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 The Boards convened in closed session at 9:18 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Boards of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. A report of actions taken will be publicly reported at the time the approved action becomes final re Agenda Item 9(b)(1). ALL DISTRICTS Reconvene in regular session Al 9:45 p.m., the Boards reconvened in regular session. DISTRICT 1 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:45 p.m. DISTRICT 2 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:45 p.m. -7- 2/14/96 DISTRICT 3 dd oumment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:45 p.m. DISTRICT 5 Adioumment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:45 p.m. DISTRICT 6 Journment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:45 p.m. DISTRICT 7 Adioumment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:45 p.m. DISTRICT 11 Journment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:45 p.m. -8- 2/14f96 DISTRICT 13 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:45 p.m. DISTRICT 14 Ad'oumment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:45 p.m. ecretary of o of Directors of County atio stricts Nos. 1, 2, 3, , 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14 -9- JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 28, 1996 Agenda Item (8): Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts (each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District). Summary See attached listing of claim payments. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of payment of claims listing. yiwaoociaswcaesEeoemae FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0122M6 PAGE 1 F REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 01/24MB POSTING DATE 012496 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 149482 A-1 FENCE CO INC. $79T00 GATE REPAIR 149453 AG TECH COMPANY $50.243.52 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0AD-9-91 149454 ASL CONSULTING ENGINEERS $1.028.74 ATWOOD SUBTRUNK PLAN PREPARATION 149485 ASRANALYSIS $1.500.00 LAB SERVICES 149485 ATM AA INC. $1.160.00 LAB SERVICES 149487 AT&T-MEGACOMSERVICE $5.453.96 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 149485 AT&T-MEGACOM SERVICE $2,903.40 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 149489 AT&T-CELLULAR CR&R $6.10 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 149420 ACORN CONSULTING $2.730.00 CONSULTING SERVICES 149491 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS,INC. $2.563.00 CONSTRUCTION PI-3&1 149492 AIR LIQUIDE AMERICA CORP. $1.247.59 SPECIALTY GASSES 149493 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $18,322.00 O&M AGREEMENT OXYGEN.SYST.M.0.8-9419 149494 ALADDIN HOUSE 9350.45 WINDOW BLINDS 149495 AMERIDATA $1.280.82 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 149496 AMERICAN AIR FILTER,INC. $1.828.36 MECHANICAL PARTS 149497 AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION 385.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 149498 AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE &317.81 CHEMICALS 149499 APA EDUCATION TRUST $2,055.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING 149500 APCO VALVE&PRIMER CORP. $1.912.56 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 149501 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $3,420.60 NOTICES&ADS 149502 APPLE ONE S5,962.00 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 149503 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $8.714.05 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 149504 AQUATIC BIOASSAY&CONSULTANTS $5,475.00 LABORATORY SERVICES 149505 ARROWHEAD ELECTRIC CORP. $416.21 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 1495DB ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE,INC. $931.20 TOXIC WASTE REMOVAL 149507 AMSA $425.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 149508 AURORA PUMP $37.00 PUMP PARTS 149509 RANDOLPH AUSTIN CO. $576.10 LAB SUPPLIES 149510 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $3,884.66 PAYROLL SERVICES 149511 BFI MEDICAL WASTE SYSTEMS $46.05 WASTE DISPOSAL 149512 E S BABCOCK&SONS INC $1,140.00 LAB ANALYSIS 149513 BAKER INSTRUMENT CO $25,019.95 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 149514 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $608.57 BATTERIES 149515 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $2,892.37 LAB SUPPLIES 149516 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $154.30 TRUCK WASH TICKETS 149517 SIOSOLIDS RECYCLERS OF SO CAL $1,000.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES 149518 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $18.14347 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-1-2 149519 BRENNER-FIEDLER&ASSOC..INC. $101.84 GENERATORS 149520 BUSH&ASSOCIATES,INC. $4.652.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6.8.94 149521 CCI TECHNOLOGIES $527.00 SPLICE CABLES 149522 C.C.S.C.E. $210.11 PUBLICATION 149523 CEM CORPORATION $7.300.40 LAB SUPPLIES 149524 CH2M HILL $10,806.20 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-31 149525 CALFON CONSTRUCTION $306,091.56 CONSTRUCTION 7-72&7-24 149526 CALTROL,INC. $1,231.05 HARDWARE 149527 CALIF ASSOC,OF SAN.AGENCIES $120.00 WORK CONFERENCE REGISTRATION FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 01/2V96 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0124M POSTING DATE 0124M WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 149528 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $85.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 149529 CALTEX PLASTICS,INC. 51,054.72 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 149530 CAMALI CORP. $3,625.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 149531 CAPITAL WESTWARD $223.71 MECHANICAL PARTS 149532 JOHN CARDLLO ENGINEERS $17.762.25 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-15.2 149533 JOHN CARDLLO ENGINEERS $1,337.14 ENGINEERING SERVICES MO B-23-95 149534 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $699.18 OFFICE FURNITURE 149535 MICHAEL A CRAMP $6,500.00 OCEAN MONITORING 149536 CHROME CRANKSHAFT,INC. $720.00 PUMP PARTS 149537 CLEMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL $12,572.67 CONSULTANT-LANDFILL PROJECT MO 7.31-95 149538 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $11,191.23 ELECTRICPARTS 149539 CONSUMER PIPE $1.267.02 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 149540 CONTINENTAL EQUIP 6 SUPPLY $16.52 TOOLS 149541 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $715.46 ENGINE PARTS 149542 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $348.10 TRUCK PARTS 149543 COVEY LEADERSHIP CENTER $558.00 SUBSCRIPTION 149544 CHARLES P.CROWLEY,CO. $369.24 INSTRUMENT PARTS 149545 CITY OF CYPRESS $25.00 BUDGET COPY 149546 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION $311.50 UNDERGROUND FUELIOIL STORAGE TAX 149547 SWRCB/AFRS $400.00 WASTE DISCHARGE FEE 149548 DATA SYSTEMS SERVICE $278.58 SOFTWARE 149549 ALBERT W DAMES INC 5474,827.36 CONSTRUCTION 3-38R 149550 DEL MAR ANALYTICAL 52,208.00 LAB SUPPLIES 149551 THE DIAMOND GROUP $4.000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 149552 LABCLEAR $100.52 LAB SUPPLIES 149553 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $392.51 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 1495M DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $942.52 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 149555 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. 5265.50 PAINT SUPPLIES 149556 EDWARDS DIV.OF GS BLDG SYS. $2.641.50 SERVICE AGREEMENT 149557 LINDA EISMAN $636.66 TRAINING SUPPLIES 149558 EMERGENCY MGMT NETWORK $1,3110.00 CPRIFIRST AID TRAINING 149559 ENCHANTER,INC. $2,600.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5-24-95 149560 FLUID TECH.SALES 5614.71 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 149561 FST SAND AND GRAVEL,INC. $1.282.26 ROAD BASE MATERIALS 149562 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $16,318.36 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 149563 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $138.50 AIR FREIGHT 1495M FILTER SUPPLY CO. $416.84 FILTERS 149565 FIRST CHOICE $1.164.32 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT 149566 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $429.60 LAB SUPPLIES 149567 FISONS INSTRUMENTS $2.161.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 149568 FLICKINGER CO $233.99 VALVE 149569 FLOSYSTEMS $10.575.05 PUMP PARTS 149570 FLUID METERING INC $2.051.17 LAB SUPPLIES 149571 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $895.80 PAINT SUPPLIES 149572 GMF SOUND INC $975.62 COMMUNICATIONS SUPPLIES 149573 GST,INC. $1,987.54 OFFICE SUPPLIES FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 0122/96 PAGES c REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0124/98 POSTING DATE 0124/86 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 149574 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $2.994.37 ELECTRIC PARTS 149575 GENERAL PETROLEUM $16.953.22 DIESEL/UNLEADED FUEL 149576 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $6,588.97 TELEPHONE SERVICES 149577 TOM GERLINGER $1,723.44 REIMS.TRAINING&TRAVEL 149578 GOVT CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENT $175.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 149579 GOVERNMENT INSTITUTES INC $1,655.00 PUBLICATIONS 149550 GRASSY S.T.I. $604.50 ENGINE PARTS 149581 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC WHOLESALE $402.43 FIBER OPTIC SUPPLIES 149582 DGA CONSULTANTS $6.933.93 SURVEYING SERVICES MO 8-23.95&MO 641.94 149583 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $958.49 TRUCK PARTS 149564 HARBOUR ENGINEERING $15.571.00 MECHANICAL PARTS 14VAS HAULAWAY CONTAINERS $730.00 CONTAINER RENTALS 149586 HAWKINS ASSOCIATES $450.00 LAB EQUIPMENT 149507 HOLMES&NARVER,INC. $9.125.30 ENGINEERING SERVICES PId4&P253 MO 3-8-95 149588 HOME DEPOT $132.26 SMALL HARDWARE 149569 IRS HUGHES CO,INC. $988.89 PAINT SUPPLIES 149590 IAHS PRESS $65.00 PUBLICATION 149591 ICMA DISTRIBUTION CTR $232.40 PUBLICATIONS 149592 IPCO SAFETY $3.09746 SAFETY SUPPLIES 149593 ITT BARTON SALES $960.29 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 149594 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $426.31 BATTERIES 149595 CITY OF IRVINE $29.000.00 ADJUST&REHABILITATE 43 MANHOLES 149598 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $70,44 WATER USE 149597 J2 PRINTING SERVICES $525.92 PRINTING 149598 JAMISON ENGINEERING $25,09832 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 149599 JAY'S CATERING $47.60 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE 149600 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO. $64.80 GAUGE 149601 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $1,166.08 ELECTRIC PARTS 149602 JONES CHEMICALS.INC. $13.918.72 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE MO 4-26-95 149603 JONES INDUSTRIAL HARDWARE CO. $1.091.87 TOOLS 149604 KAL ARCHITECTS $1,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE 149605 FRANCES L.KALUZNY $1,680,00 HUMAN RESOURCES CONSULTANT 149606 KEYE PRODUCTIVITY CENTER $248.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 149607 KING BEARING,INC. $1.045,96 MACHINE SUPPLIES 149608 KIPLINGER $132.00 PUBLICATION 149609 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $6,538.02 TOOLS 149810 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $330.79 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICE 149611 LAIDLAW ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES $32.220.24 WASTE DISPOSAL 149612 LAMSON CORPORATION $213,89 COMPUTER PARTS 149613 LAW/CRANDAL,INC. $1,778.75 SOIL TESTING 7.13.94 149614 LEAGUE OF CLAIF.CITIES $165.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 149515 LEE&RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC. $23.798,69 ENGINEERING SERVICES 149616 SOCO-LYNCH CORP. $493.93 JANITORIAL SERVICES 149817 MPS $59.34 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 149618 MACOMCO 5464A0 SERVICE AGREEMENT 149619 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS,INC. $6.164.68 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 01/22M6 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 01/24/96 POSTING DATE 01124/96 WARRANTNO. VENDOR AMOUNT 149620 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $612,150.00 CONSTRUCTION 1`1-36-2 149621 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. 558,703.97 CONSTRUCTION P242-2 149622 MARTIN INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE $3,475.20 SECURITY CONSULTING 149623 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $438.88 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 149524 THE MCGRAW-HILL COMPANIES $134A7 PUBLICATION 149625 DONALD F. MCINTYRE $103.91 REIMBURSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE 149626 MEASUREMENT VARIABLES,INC. $1,236.96 FILTER SUPPLIES 149827 MIDWAY MFG.&MACHINING $9,298.58 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 149628 MILLTRONICS $1,787.53 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 149629 MONITOR LABS $249.98 INSTRUMENT 149630 MUSTANG UNITS CO.,INC. $3.509.00 ENGINE 149631 NASCO $271.33 LAB SUPPLIES 149632 NAT WEST MARKETS $1,000.0D COP INTEREST DRAW FEES 149633 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES $875.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 149634 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $2,215.02 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 149635 - NEWARK ELECTRONICS $153.05 INSTRUMENT PARTS 149638 NICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY $20,901.82 LUBRICANTS/DIESEL FUEL 149637 OLSTEN STAFFING SERVICES 52,016.00 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 149638 THE ORANGE COUNTY FORUM $375.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING 149539 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. $1,375.39 FITTINGS 149540 OXYGEN SERVICE $1.528.01 SPECIALTY GASES 149641 COUNTY OF ORANGE $2.530.50 PERMITS 149642 PACIFIC PARTS $2.381.52 INSTRUMENT PARTS 149643 PACIFIC BELL $1.702.85 TELEPHONE SERVICES 149644 PADGETT - THOMPSON $885.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 149645 PAGENET $1,015.90 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 149M PALLETS&ACCESSORIES CO. $1.531.13 PALLETS 149647 PARKHOUSE TIRE,INC. $1,108.88 TIRES 149648 PARTS UNLIMITED $338.96 TRUCK PARTS 149649 PEGASUS MAIL-C/O DAVID HARRIS $350.00 SOFTWARE 149650 PENN STATE UNIVERSITY $4,790.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 14SB51 MIKE PETERSON $105.49 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 14052 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $4,551.57 REIMS.PETTY CASH,TRAINING&TRAVEL 149653 POLYMETRICS,INC. $1,262.76 LAB SUPPLIES 149654 POLYPURE,INC. $23,199.40 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92 149655 POSTAGE BY PHONE $5.000.00 POSTAGE 149656 PUMPING SOLUTIONS INC $813.66 PUMP PARTS 149657 PUTZMEISTER,INC. $92.52 PUMP PARTS 149658 OMS INC $183.23 REPAIR 149659 QUICKSTART TECHNOLOGIES $3.750.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 149660 R&R INSTRUMENTS $561.59 ELECTRIC PARTS 149661 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO. $902.88 LAB SUPPLIES 149662 THE REGISTER $1,168.80 ' NOTICES&ADS 149663 REMEDYTEMP $3,190.71 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES ' 149664 RENOLDINC. $85.10 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 149665 DON RICHARDSON WATER TRUCK $8.249.50 WATER TANK d FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 01/22/96 PAGE 5 -� REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 01124M POSTING DATE 0124196 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 14M RM MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL $2,378.95 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 149667 RODNEY-HUNTCO $245.40 HEADWORKS REPAIR 149668 SKC WEST $1.284.94 SAFETY SUPPLIES 149669 SANTA PE BAG CO. $218.94 FREIGHT 149870 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $78.12 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 149671 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTL $46,715.64 OCEAN MONITORING MO 6.28-95 149672 R.CRAIG SCOTT&ASSOC. $2,756.07 LEGAL SERVICES-PERSONNEL ISSUES 149673 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $1.482.16 SPECIALTY GASES 149574 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $2.033.50 TOOLS 149575 SHURELUCK SALES $4,215.09 TOOLSHARDWARE 149676 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $1,588.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 149677 SMITH-EMERY CO. $516.00 SOIL TESTING M.O.743.94 149878 SMITH PIPE&SUPPLY $343.37 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 149679 ROYA SOHANAKI $754.62 DAMAGE CLAIM SETTLEMENT 149590 SO COAST AIR QUALITY $1.642.48 PERMIT FEES 149681 SOUTHERN CALIF ASSOC OF $75.00 PUBLICATION 149682 SO CALIF EDISON CO $1,284.86 POWER 149583 SO CALIF EDISON CO $25,896.30 POWER 149684 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $27.157.73 NATURAL GAS 149685 SO.CALIF.WATER CO. $69.03 WATER USE 149686 SPEX CHEMICAL&SAMPLE PREP $314.98 LAB SUPPLIES 149687 SUMMIT STEEL $2,538A7 METAL 149688 SUPELCO,INC. $1,320.53 LAB SUPPLIES 149689 SUPER CHEM CORP. $608.85 CHEMICALS 149690 SURVEYORS SERVICE CO $134.79 TOOLS 149691 SYNECTIC MEDICAL,INC. $1,561.00 LAB SUPPLIES 149692 T&C INDUSTRIAL CONTROLS $1,613.00 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 149693 TEKTRONIX.INC. $385.96 INSTRUMENT PARTS 149694 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $359.21 MECHANICAL PARTS 14%95 THORPE INSULATION $47.63 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 149696 TONY'S LOCK&SAFE SERVICE $80.01 LOCKS&KEYS 149697 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $202.05 TRUCK PARTS 149698 TRUESDAIL LABS $3,540.00 LAB SERVICES 149699 JG TUCKER&SON,INC. $15.111.20 INSTRUMENT PARTS 149700 VWR SCIENTIFIC $3.281.08 LAB SUPPLIES 149701 VALIN CORPORATION $498.46 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 149702 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $1.392.40 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 149703 VERTEX TECHNOLOGIES,INC. $5.192.68 FIBER OPTICS 149704 WARREN GORHAM&LAMONT INC $349.21 PUBLICATION&SUBSCRIPTION 149705 WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION $1,155.96 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT COURSES 149706 WAXIE $1.955.02 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 149707 WAYNE ELECTRIC $28183 TRUCK PARTS 149708 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $23,679.12 CAUSTIC SODA MO 8.23.95 149709 WEST-CITE SUPPLY CO. $367.28 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 149710 ROURKE,WOODRUFF&SPRADLIN $78.983.59 LEGAL SERVICES MO 7.26.95 149711 XEROX CORP. $16.404.62 COPIER LEASES FUND NO 9199 - Ji DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 0127/96 PAGE6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0124M POSTING DATE 0124M WARRANT NO. VENDOR 149712 JOHNSON YOKOGAWA CORP. $714b3 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 1227195 $2.387.767.17 SUMMARY AMOUNT 01 CONSTR FUND $92.60 02 OPER FUND $14.36 02 CAP FAC FUND $1,028,74 02 CONSTR FUND $262,51 03 OPER FUND $25,344,19 O3 CAP FAC FUND 5474,827.36 83 CONSTR FUND $283.71 A5 OPER FUND $39227 i5 CONSTR FUND $m 80 #6 CONSTR FUND $6920 W7 OPER FUND 575.42 k7 CAP FAC FUND 312.016.06 M7 CONSTR FUND 98.11 811 OPER FUND S740A8 #11 CAP FAC FUND 1,637A4 Wit CONSTR FUND 8531 i13 CONSTR FUND S3 40 014 OPER FUND $30.85 914 CAP FAC FUND S71400 814 CONSTR FUND $19.96 93811 OPER FUND S87500 N588 OPER FUND $34.04 #586 CAP FAC FUND $644.00 4687 OPER FUND $213.30 k7814 OPER FUND $15.98 JT OPER FUND $330.891.89 CORF $716,314.33 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $3,511A9 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $508,946.67 $2,387,767.17 m FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE O V30196 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 01/30/96 POSTING DATE O1130/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 149714 ACWA $300.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING 149715 CALIF.DEBT ADVISORY $100.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING 149716 JAYS CATERING $1.684.69 DIRECTORS MEETING EXPENSE 149717 R.CRAIG SCOTT B ASSOC. E8,582.81 LEGAL SERVICES-PERSONNEL ISSUES E70,887.50 SUMMARY AMOUNT JT OPER FUND $1.984.69 CORP $100.00 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $6.582.81 $10.667.50 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0VOW96 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 02/07/96 POSTING DATE 02J07196 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 149731 AT&T- UNIPLAN SERVICE $2,494.55 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 149732 AT&T-MEGACOM SERVICE $1.404.38 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 149733 AT&T $66.53 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 149734 A T&T-CELLULAR CR&R $8.65 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 149735 A-Z LOGIC SYSTEMS $192.62 LAB SUPPLIES 149736 RP ADAMS COMPANY $1,750.43 MECHANICALPARTS 149737 AIR LIQUIDS AMERICA CORP. $1.947.32 SPECIALTY GASSES 149738 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $18,555A3 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.O.8-889 149739 AIRBORNE EXPRESS $347.57 AIR FREIGHT 149740 AMERIDATA $1.125.61 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 149741 AMERICAN AIRLINES $824.36 TRAVEL SERVICES 149742 AMOCO ENERGY TRADING $61.394.58 NATURAL GAS MO6-28-95 149743 ANIXTER-DISTRIBUTION $3.570.09 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 149744 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $2.332.22 NOTICES&ADS 149745 APPLE ONE $2.208.80 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 149746 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $124.63 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 149747 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT $1.346.82 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 149748 ATKINIJONES COMPUTER SERVICE $642.60 SERVICE AGREEMENT 149749 AUTODESK INC. $5,095.52 SOFTWARE 149750 B.M.I. $325.00 ELECTRIC PARTS 149751 E S BABCOCK&SONS INC $898.50 LAB ANALYSIS 149752 BANANA BLUEPRINT $22,449.24 PRINTING M.O.11-07-94 149753 BANK OF AMERICA $220.64 BANKING CHARGES 149754 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $954.95 BATTERIES 149755 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $1,204.72 LAB SUPPLIES 149766 BERENDSEN FLUID POWER $112.27 VALVE 149767 BLANCHARD TRAINING&DEV $103.30 TRAINING PUBLICATIONS 149768 TOM BLANDA $136.79 TRAINING EXPENSE REIMS . 149759 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $2,842.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-18 149760 BRENNER-FIEDLER&ASSOC.,INC. $5.697.67 GENERATORS 149761 BROOKS INSTRUMENT DIV. $341.25 INSTRUMENT 149762 BUDGET JANITORIAL $3.330.00 JANITORIAL SERVICES MO 1-12-94 149763 BNI BOOKS $89.92 BOOKS 149764 CCI TECHNOLOGIES $420.00 SPLICE CABLES 149765 CEPA $899.60 LAB ANALYIS 149766 CH2M HILL $164,542.45 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-31 149767 CS COMPANY $5,762.96 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 149768 CALFON CONSTRUCTION $97.833.03 CONSTRUCTION 7.22&7-24 149769 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH INC. $969.75 LAB SUPPLIES 149770 CALTROL,INC. $6,303.69 HARDWARE 149771 CAMALI CORP. $1,124.88 SERVICE AGREEMENT 149772 CANUS CORPORATION $8,286.52 FIBER OPTIC CABLE 149773 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $32,317.74 ENGINEERING SERVICES MO 5-24-95 , 149774 RICHARD CASTILLON $135.96 TRAINING EXPENSE REIMS 149775 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $1,758.15 OFFICE FURNITURE 149776 CHEMWEST INC $1.335.02 PUMP PARTS a FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE D2/0 M PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 02107MO POSTING DATE 02107/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 149777 CHROME CRANKSHAFT,INC. $240.00 PUMP PARTS 149778 CLEMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL $20.086.10 CONSULTANT-LANDFILL PROJECT MO 7.31-95 149779 COASTAL VIDEO COMMUNICATION $13.501.43 TRAINING VIDEOS 149760 COUCH S SONS $30.643.20 CONSTRUCTION M-044 149781 COLICH&SONS $190.334.00 CONSTRUCTION 11-17-1 149782 COMMUNICATIONS PERFORMANCE GROUP $17.850.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 149783 COMPUSA,INC. $64.97 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 149784 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $7.659.20 ELECTRIC PARTS 149785 CONSUMER PIPE $2.071.20 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 149786 CONTINENTAL EQUIPMENT B SUPPLY $2,213.04 TOOLS 149787 CONTINENTAL LIB PRODUCTS,INC. $60.54 LAB SUPPLIES 149788 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $17,897.03 ENGINE PARTS 149789 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $2.464.74 ELECTRIC PARTS 149790 CHARLES P.CROWLEY,CO. $648.25 INSTRUMENT PARTS 149791 ALBERT W.DAVIES,INC. $320.454.55 CONSTRUCTION 3-35R 149792 DOUGLAS J DAVIS&ASSOC.,INC. $3.949.90 INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE SERVICES 149793 DELL COMPUTER CORP. $752.10 COMPUTER PARTS 149794 DEL MAR ANALYTICAL $190.00 BIOSOLIDS ANALYSIS 149795 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIF. $60.889.11 DENTAL INSURANCE PLAN M.O.1-12-94 149796 DELTA FOAM PRODUCTS $145.00 LAB SUPPLIES 149797 THE DIAMOND GROUP $4,000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 149798 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $31,912.81 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 149799 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $90.51 PAINT SUPPLIES 149800 OVALS SALES $576.19 FITTINGS 149801 OYCORP $241.79 TRUCK PARTS 1498D2 ESP NORTH $685.46 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 1498D3 EDWARDS HIGH VACUUM INTER. $290.57 LAB SUPPLIES 149804 FMC CORPORATION $75.299.11 HYDROGEN PEROXIDE MO 9-14-94 149805 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $111.65 AIR FREIGHT 149806 FILTERLINE CORP. $37.00 FILTERS 149807 FILTER SUPPLY CO. 54,839.53 FILTERS 149808 FIRST CHOICE $391.64 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT 149809 FISCHER B PORTER CO. $2,774.75 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 149810 FISHER ROSEMOUNT $1.736.98 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 149811 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $13,591.44 WATER USE 149812 FRY'S ELECTRONICS $723.39 ELECTRONIC B COMPUTER SUPPLIES 149813 GST,INC. $11.443.85 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 149814 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $2.543.98 CHEMICALS 149815 GATES FIBERGLASS INSTALLERS $3,2D4.62 FIBERGLASS WHEEL 149818 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $4,066.49 ELECTRIC PARTS 149817 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1.078.10 TELEPHONE SERVICES 149818 GERHARDTS,INC. 54,200.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 149819 GIERLICH-MNCHELL.INC. $25,486.56 PUMP PARTS 149820 WW GRAINGER,INC. $122.64 COMPRESSOR PARTS 149821 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS 52,095.90 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 149822 GRAYRAR ELECTRIC WHOLESALE $3,238.29 FIBER OPTIC SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 021D6196 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 02107196 POSTING DATE 0=7196 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 149823 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $600.52 PRINTING 149824 DGA CONSULTANTS $3,020.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.03-&94 149825 HR DIRECT $1399 OFFICE SUPPLIES 149826 HB TYPE B GRAPHICS $346.96 PRINTING 149827 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $3.199.85 TRUCK PARTS 149828 HACH COMPANY $3.810.35 LAB SUPPLIES 149829 GEORGE T.HALL CO. S456A8 ELECTRIC PARTS 149830 HATCH 8 KIRK.INC. $3.024.91 TRUCK PARTS 149831 PL HAWN CO.INC. $321.23 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 149832 HELLO DIRECT $198.76 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 149833 HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT $2.083.33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN. 149834 HERTZ EQUIPMENT RENTAL $502.95 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 149835 HOERBIGER CVS CALIF.,INC. $2,972.67 COMPRESSOR PARTS 149336 HOME DEPOT $756.92 SMALL HARDWARE 149837 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $653.38 PAINT SUPPLIES 149638 1 CM A DISTRIBUTION CENTER $141.85 PUBLICATION 149839 IPCO SAFETY $4,121,94 SAFETY SUPPLIES 149840 ISI INFORTEXT $3.692.75 SOFTWARE 149841 ITT BARTON SALES $192.12 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 149842 IMAGING PLUS $523.81 OFFICE SUPPLIES 149843 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $35.56 CONNECTORS 149844 INORGANIC VENTURES $227.72 LAB SUPPLIES 149845 INSIDE EPA $1.335.00 SUBSCRIPTIONS 149846 INSTRUMENT LABORATORY $373.59 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 149847 IRVINE PHOTO GRAPHICS $21.29 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 149848 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $5.54 WATER USE 149849 IRVINE SCI-TECH BOOKS $430.00 PUBLICATIONS 149850 J2 PRINTING SERVICES $2.533.79 PRINTING 149851 JAMISON ENGINEERING $12.010.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 149852 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $1.711.37 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 149853 DEE JASPAR 8 ASSOC. $5.005.32 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 149854 JAY'S CATERING $1,418.39 DIRECTORS MEETING EXPENSE 149856 JOHNSON CONTROLS,INC. $203.80 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 149856 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $149.20 ELECTRIC PARTS 149857 JOHNSTON PUMP CO $2.193.02 ELECTRIC PARTS 149858 JONES CHEMICALS,INC. $7,457.31 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE MO 426-95 149859 FRANCES L KALUZNY $1,280.00 HUMAN RESOURCES CONSULTANT 149B60 KELLY PAPER $937.40 PRINTING 149861 KEMIRON PACIFIC,INC. $149.592.10 FERRIC CHLORIDE M09-27-95 149862 KERRY CONSULTING GROUP $3,906.18 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MO 11-15-95 149863 KEYE PRODUCTIVITY CENTER $139.00 REGISTRATION 149864 KING BEARING,INC. $1,408.90 MACHINE SUPPLIES 149865 KLEINFELDER $432.00 GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTING SERVICES 149566 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $5.598.92 TOOLS ' 149867 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $613.57 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICE 149868 LAIDLAW ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES $5,444.04 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DISPOSAL b FUNDNO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE O2 /96 PAGE4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 02I07/96 POSTING DATE 02/07M WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 149869 LAWAIR SUPPLY CO.,INC. $114.53 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 149870 LASERALL CORP. $582.00 PRINTER REPAIR 149871 LAW/CRANDAL,INC. 5660.00 SOIL TESTING 7-M94 149672 LEE 6 RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC. $9.908.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES 149873 UEBERT CORPORATION $2.291.38 ELECTRIC PARTS 149874 K.P.LINDSTROM,INC. $3.481.14 ENVIR.CONSULTING SERVICES MO 12-9-90 149375 LUSTRE-CAL $545.98 SAFETY 149870 MDT BIOLOGIC COMPANY $935.00 LAB SUPPLIES 149877 MPS $414.04 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 149578 MACOMCO $596.75 SERVICE AGREEMENT 149879 MAGNETEK $38.213.59 GENERATOR MAINTENANCE 149880 MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY CORP. $1,652.48 TOOLS 149BBI MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $22.20 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 149882 MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. $551.63 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 149883 MIDWAY MFG.8 MACHINING $3.029.56 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 149884 MISSION INDUSTRIES $6,704.89 UNIFORM RENTALS 149885 MONITOR LABS $874.44 INSTRUMENT 149886 MOODYS INVESTORS SERVICE $5.000.00 RATING SERVICE MAINTENANCE FEES 149887 MOORE PRODUCTS CO $179.39 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 149888 MORTON SALT 5673.70 SALT 149889 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES $5,367.50 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 149890 G ROBERTNEASE PHOTOGRAPHY $1,677.B7 PROFESSIONAL PHOTOGRAPHER 149891 NEW HORIZONS COMPUTER CENTERS.INC. $780.00 SOFTWARE TRAINING CLASSES 149892 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $6.00 WATER USE 149893 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $5.929.94 OFFICE SUPPLIES 149894 OLSTEN STAFFING SERVICES $1.708.00 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 149895 ORANGE COURIER $138.65 COURIER SERVICES 149896 ORANGE VALVE B FITTING CO. $107.91 FITTINGS 149697 OXYGEN SERVICE $3,456.73 SPECIALTY GASES 149598 ORANGE CO EMPLOYEES $4.799.25 EARLY RETIREMENT PROGRAM REIMS 149899 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT $27.760.20 GAP WATER USE M.O.64-93 149900 PACIFIC CUPPIINGS $188.80 CONTRACT SERVICE 142901 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $1.116.06 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 149902 PACIFIC PARTS $9.238.84 INSTRUMENT PARTS 149903 PACIFIC BELL $15.90 TELEPHONE SERVICES 149904 PARAGON CABLE $41.28 CABLE SERVICES 1499D5 PARKHOUSE TIRE,INC. 5555.99 TIRES 149906 PEDERSEN COMMUNICATIONS $4,348.00 INSTALLATION OF CABLES 149907 PERSONAL STRENGHTS PUBLICATION $394.01 PUBLICATION 149908 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $620.07 REIMS.PETTY CASH,TRAINING B TRAVEL 149909 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $193,03.20 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3.29-95 149910 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS $5.914.44 CONSULTING SERVICE 149911 POLYPURE,INC. $24,135.22 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-92 149912 POWER PROTECTION $432.48 MISC.HARDWARE 149913 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $112.00 ICE FOR SAMPLES 149914 PROMINENT FLUID CONTROL,INC. $799.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 02106196 PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 02/07M POSTING DATE 02107/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 149915 PRYOR REPORT 5532.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 149916 PUBLIC SECTOR EXCELLENCE $7,200.00 TRAINING CONSULTANT-RISK MGMIT 149917 PUMPING SOLUTIONS,INC. $298.33 PUMP PARTS 149918 PYRAMID FENCE COMPANY $2.275.00 FENCING INSTALLATION 149919 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $590.59 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS 149920 R&R INSTRUMENTS $1.837.70 ELECTRIC PARTS 149921 REMEDYTEMP $2,245.53 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 149922 DON RICHARDSON WATER TRUCK $8,218.50 WATER TANK 149923 RM MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL AND/OR RTRAL $2.126.67 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 149924 LAWRENCE ROOD $186.85 EXPENSE REPORT 149925 SANCON ENGINEERING,INC. $750.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 149926 SANTA FIE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $154.83 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 149927 BASCO ELECTRIC $2.220.00 CONTRACT SERVICES 149928 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INPL _ $38,887.70 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6E-94 149929 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $3,678.03 SPECIALTY GASES 149930 SENTIENT SYSTEMS,INC. $19,619.87 FACILITATOR SERVICES 149931 SHURELUCK SALES $3.019.75 TOOLSIHARDWARE 149932 THE SMITH GROUP $3.487.10 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 149933 SOLAR TURBINES INCORPORATED $304.98 MECHANICAL PARTS 149934 SO COAST AIR QUALITY $2.594.79 PERMIT FEES 149935 SO CALIF EDISON CO $59,477.32 POWER 149936 SO CALIF EDISON CO $16,241.93 POWER 149937 SO.CALIFORNIA MARINE INST. E500.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 149930 STAMEN Z.SPASSOFF P.E. $4,000.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19-2 149939 SUMMIT STEEL 5602.02 METAL 149940 SUPERB ONE-HOUR PHOTO $36.26 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 149941 SYMCAS $5,657.92 SOFTWARE LICENSE 149942 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $2,72&03 MECHANICAL PARTS 149943 TIRE WAREHOUSE $1,113.62 TIRES 149944 TONER SYSTEM INTERNATIONAL $1,412.16 PRINTER SUPPLIES 149945 TRANE $352.41 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 149946 TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY,INC. $17.503.84 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.0.5-H-94 149947 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $535.71 TRUCK PARTS 149948 TRUESDAIL LABS $1,120.10 LAB SERVICES 149N9 JG TUCKER&SON,INC. $2.326.54 INSTRUMENT PARTS 149950 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $403.00 LAB SUPPLIES 149951 UNISOURCEWOR BUTLER PAPER $837.49 OFFICE SUPPLIES 149952 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $806.70 PARCEL SERVICES 149953 VWR SCIENTIFIC $145,42 LAB SUPPLIES 149954 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $2.089.95 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 149955 VANIER BUSINESS FORMS $975.95 OFFICE SUPPLIES 149956 VARIAN ASSOCIATES,INC. $1,298.61 LAB SUPPLIES 149957 VERTEX SYSTEMS $3.570.26 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT 149958 VILLAGE NURSERIES $326.26 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 149959 WACKENHUT CORP. $27.295.79 CONTRACT SERVICESECURRY GUARDS 149960 WAL-CON CONSTRUCTION CO. $170,041.19 CONSTRUCTION 5.37-3 O .. FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 02/06196 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 02107188 POSTING DATE 02/07196 WARRANT NO, VENDOR 149961 WAL-CON CONSTRUCTION CO. $8,400.89 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 149962 CARL WARREN S CO. $300.00 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR 149963 WAXIE E4,792.61 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 149964 WESTERN CITY MAGAZINE $63.00 SUBSCRIPTION 149965 WESTERN COMPONENT SALES NORTH E41732 LAB SUPPLIES 149966 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $35.993.49 CAUSTIC SODA MO 11-23-95 149967 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $1.015.13 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 149960 WESCO E290.89 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 149969 WOLFE AND ASSOCIATES,INC. $1,688.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 149970 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $291.57 LAB SUPPLIES 149971 YELLOW SPRINGS INSTRUMENT CO. $37.14 LAB SUPPLIES 149972 AG TECH COMPANY $58.580.03 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10.9-91 149973 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. $60.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL 149974 AWARDS B TROPHIES $147.58 PLAQUES 149975 BANANA BLUEPRINT $227.10 PRINTING M.O.11-07-94 149976 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. E4,340.62 LAB SUPPLIES 149977 BIOGRO DIVISION $84,345.91 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 4-26-95 149976 COMPUSERVE $126.02 COMPUTER SERVICES 149979 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $1,463.86 ELECTRIC PARTS 149980 ENCHANTER,INC. $3,500,00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5.24-95 149981 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $867.70 LAB SERVICES 149982 PST SAND AND GRAVEL,INC. $769.35 ROAD BASE MATERIALS 149983 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $7,568.75 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9.91 1499" FILTER SUPPLY CO. E33.97 FILTERS 149985 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $889.16 LAB SUPPLIES 149986 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $360.68 PHOTO SUPPLIES 149987 NEW HORIZONS COMPUTER CENTERS,INC. $5,340.00 SOFTWARE TRAINING CLASSES 149988 BOLT DELIVERY $99.30 FREIGHT E2,802.740.31 FUND NO 91" - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE D2/O6/96 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07/07I98 POSTING DATE 02/07/98 SUMMARY AMOUNT 01 CONSTR FUND $443.50 #2 OPER FUND $3,135.08 #2 CAP PAC FUND $11.91 #2 CONSTR FUND $1.886.50 93 OPER FUND $42.711.83 03 CAP FAC FUND $360,028.95 03 CONSTR FUND $1,074.50 05 OPER FUND $12,132.11 05 CONSTR FUND $670.50 06 CAP FAG FUND $69.84 06 CONSTR FUND $183.00 07 OPER FUND $15.594.71 07 CAP FAC FUND $46,079.10 07 CONSTR FUND $515.00 011 OPER FUND $4,148.29 011 CAP FAC FUND $190,778.76 011 CONSTR FUND $227.00 014 CAP FAC FUND $17.05 05&8 OPER FUND $2.454.64 05&6 CAP FAC FUND 170,082.66 06&7 OPER FUND 2,256.68 07&14 OPER FUND 8,341.96 JT OPER FUND $1,097,537.60 CORF &377,868.63 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $63,272.44 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $183,218.02 $2.602.740.34 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 28, 1996 Agenda Item (9)(a): Consideration of Resolution No. 96-17, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Purchase of Muriatic Acid, Specification No. C-037, to Pressure Vessel Service, Inc., for the delivered price of $0.46 per gallon, plus sales tax, for a one-year period beginning April 10, 1996, with provisions for four one-year extensions (estimated annual cost $69,800.00 plus sales tax). Summary The Districts use muriatic acid to clean the treatment plant foul air scrubbers and related equipment. The Districts expect to use approximately 130,000 gallons of chemical during the next contract period. The Districts have traditionally purchased an acid of 32% concentration. At this concentration, the chemical is on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) hazardous material list and the Districts would have to develop an EPA-required "Risk Management and Prevention Plan" (RMPP). This plan is estimated to cost the Districts $200,000. Therefore, the Districts elected to purchase acid at a 20% concentration. Al an acid concentration of 20%, the chemical is not on the EPA hazardous material list and the Districts will not be required to develop an RMPP. Purchasing the chemical at the lower concentration will increase the Districts' chemical costs. The increase in cost is related to the additional water required for dilution and the associated cost to transport the water to the treatment plants. Sealed bids were received on January 30, 1996, for furnishing and delivering 20% muriatic acid for a one-year period, beginning April 10, 1996, with an option for four one-year extensions. Five bids and two no-bids were received. The bids are based on furnishing and delivering 130,000 gallons of bulk chemical acid. The low bid was $59,800.00 and the high bid was $113,750,000, plus all applicable sales lax. The low bid represents a cost of$0.46 per gallon of bulk chemical, including delivery, but exclusive of sales tax. The Districts budgeted $21,000 for acid for the fiscal year. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends award of a contract to Pressure Vessel Service, Inc., for the Purchase of Muriatic Acid, Specification No. C-037, at the above-mentioned "low bid" unit price, for a one-year period, with provisions for four one-year extensions. JAW PDOC185UG96TE896'&A. n February 7, 1996 MEMORANDUM bm TO: Robert J. Ooten Director of Operations FROM: Katherine Yarosh Senior Buyer SUBJECT: Purchase of Muriatic Acid Specification No. C-037 Sealed bids were opened January 30, 1996, for the Purchase of Muriatic Acid, Specification No. 0037. Tabulation of bids is as follows: SUPPLIER DELIVERED PRICE PER GALLON Pressure Vessel Service, Inc. $.46 Gallade $.475 HoltraChem, Inc. $.59 Los Angeles Chemical $.875 Western States Chemical Supply Corp. $.445/1500 gal. $.352/3000 gal. All Pure Chemical Company No-Bid Commerce Chemical Company No-Bid Staff recommends the award be made to Pressure Vessel Service,Inc.,the lowest responsible bidder,for a one-year contract period starling April 10, 1996. The total estimated annual delivered price of$59,800.00, including freight and taxes, but exclusive of sales tax,is based on furnishing 130,000 gallons. Provisions are in the specifications for up tot four(4)one-year contract extensions. a nt Ma YM Cry r? Katherine Yarosh 1 Senior Buyer We hereby concur vA he above reWmmendation G ry G. Streen Director of FhIWFM n Robert J. Ooten Director of Operations KY:Ih G1W PTURCMIIELLER\BIMCO37AIR CSDOC • P.O.Box 8127 0 Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 • (714)962-2411 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 28, 1996 Agenda Item (9)(b): Consideration of Resolution No. 96-18, approving Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Clifford A. Forkert Civil Engineers for Surveying Services for Various Collection System and Treatment Plant Projects, Specification No. P-150, providing for a name change to Forkert Engineering & Surveying, Inc. Summary Clifford A. Forkert Civil Engineers was awarded a contract in June 1994 to assist in Surveying Services for Various Collection System and Treatment Plant Projects, Specification No. P-150. The firm has recently reorganized under the new name of Forkert Engineering & Surveying, Inc. Staff Recommendation Staff is requesting the Boards of Directors to adopt a resolution approving Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Clifford A. Forkert Civil Engineers for Surveying Services for Various Collection System and Treatment Plant Projects, Specification No. P-150, providing for a name change to Forkert Engineering & Surveying, Inc. JiWPDOCIBSNGWFE8W&B JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 28, 1996 District No. 2 Agenda Item (9)(c): Consideration of Resolution No. 96-22-2 approving reimbursement agreement with Orange County Flood Control District re: Installation of flood protection on South River Trunk as part of the Santa Ana River Flood Improvements in an amount not to exceed $50,000.00. Summary As the Directors are aware, for many years the Corps of Engineers has planned, designed, and is now constructing improvements to the Santa Ana River Mainstem including channel improvements to the Santa Ana River within Orange County. The channel improvements are a joint project of the Orange County Flood Control District and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Reach 7 of the Santa Ana River Mainstem Project, the Santa Ana River Channel from Glassell Street to Imperial Highway, will soon be awarded for construction. Within Reach 7, the District operates the South River Trunk which crosses the channel at Imperial Highway under an encroachment permit issued in 1976. Under the terms of that permit, the Sanitation District is responsible for all costs associated with the protection of the sewer line. The District has worked with the Orange County Flood Control District to include within the Corps project flood protection to this existing sewer trunk. Including this work in the Corps of Engineers' contract will reduce costs and administrative work. The construction cost is estimated at $35,224.00 to which must be added a 10 percent charge for Flood Control District inspection and administration costs. This request is to approve a reimbursement agreement authorizing the District to pay up to $50,000.00 to cover administrative costs, possible change orders or higher than estimated bids. Staff Recommendation Authorize the expenditure for up to $50,000.00 for the protection of the South River Trunk within the Santa Ana River Channel and approve Reimbursement Agreement No. D95-135 providing for flood protection of the South River Trunk and reimbursement of costs to the Orange County Flood Control District. JAWPD0ORSWG%\FEB96l C. JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 28, 1996 District 5 Agenda Item (9)(d): Consideration of motion to receive and file Summons and Complaint for Inverse Condemnation, Charles G. Reynolds, at al., vs. City of Newport Beach, et al., Superior Court Case No. 758245, for alleged damages to homes due to surface run off because of a ruptured sewer line adjacent to plaintiffs' homes, and authorize District's General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the District. Summary Please see General Counsel's memorandum dated February 14, 1996. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Board of Directors receive and file Summons & Complaint for Inverse Condemnation, Charles G. Reynolds, et al., vs. City of Newport Beach, et al., Superior Court Case No. 758245 and authorize District's General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the District. J:\WPD0C1BSNG9 EBM%D. JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING AGENDA FEBRUARY 28, 1996 (11)(a) committees' Minutes mma (1) Receive and file draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on January 24, 1996. (2) Receive and file draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on February 1, 1996. (3) Receive and file draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on February 7, 1996. (4) Receive and file draft Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on February 14, 1996. (5) Receive and file draft Executive Committee Minutes for the meeting held on February21, 1996. Summary See attached draft minutes. Recommendation Receive and file draft minutes listed above. J:WPDOCa5NG98FEB98�11AW PD County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California P.O. Box 8127 • 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE January 24, 1996-5:30 p.m. A meeting of the Steering Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held Wednesday, January 24, 1996, at 5:30 p.m., at the Districts' Administrative office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: STEERING COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Present: John C. Cox, Jr., Joint Chair Peer A. Swan, Vice Joint Chair STAFF PRESENT: George Brown, Chair, FAHR Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager John J. Collins, Chair, PDC Blake P. Anderson, Assistant General Manager Pat McGuigan, Chair, OMTS Judith A. Wilson, Assistant General Manager Nancy Wheatley, Director of Technical Services Absent: Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary Roger Stanton, Vice Chair, FAHR (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. (4) APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the December 13, 1995 Steering Committee meeting were approved as drafted. V Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting Page 2 January 24, 1996 (5) REPORTS OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR. GENERAL MANAGER AND GENERAL COUNSEL (a) There was no report by the Committee Chairman. (b) The General Manager reported on his participation in professional outside interests. He is currently active on two committees, which are helping him understand the politics and players in the County. He is not representing the Districts but rather himself. Director Swan expressed some concern because the Restructuring Committee (a subcommittee of the Orange County Division of the League of California Cities) does not have any elected officials as members. Mr. McIntyre said that the group is more of a "think tank" and will be making recommendations only and sharing ideas. He will keep the Directors informed. The Districts' response to Assemblyman Pringle's proposed Special Districts Consolidation bill. The Committee advised staff to make personal contact with Mr. Pringle here in Orange County, if possible, or his aides. Chair Cox said that this issue was discussed at CASA last week, and the CASA lobbyist said that he is unclear where Mr. Pringle is coming from. Judy Wilson indicated that this bill may be the result of LAFCO's taking so long to act on the Garden Grove Sanitary District dissolution, any may have been suggested by the mayor of Garden Grove. (c) There was no report by Counsel. (6) DISCUSSION ITEMS (a) Update on the status of the Consolidation Effort Judy Wilson reported on the activities since the last meeting. The draft feasibility plan was received just this afternoon and she hasn't had a chance to review it in too much detail. Basically, the consultant is suggesting proceeding to form one district that incorporates all nine districts. One important thing to consider is the real estate investment (about$15 million) by District 14. This sum could be credited against the reserves that IRWD needs to provide the Districts. Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting Page 3 January 24, 1996 Zones would have to be established to address the issue of different connection fees. These fees are going to be addressed in the strategic plan. Eventually they would be equalized over time, depending on the capital requirements specified in the Strategic Plan, and then the zones can be eliminated and user fees established The report does not recommend annexing any areas that could be annexed. This areas will be identified in the LAFCO application and LAFCO may stipulate that this be done. The $60,000 in general obligation debt must be addressed. Director Swan indicated that the more he hears, the more uncomfortable he is becoming about the terms. General Counsel indicated that depending on what section of the state code new district is created under would determine whether IRWD would have a seat on the Board. Director Swan said that he needs to make sure that all the electeds know the consequences. The Pringle bill would certainly have an impact, and Assemblyman Pringle has indicated that the County Sanitation Districts are part of the picture. Chair Cox indicated that consolidation is the smartest thing to do and that it would allow fixing the organization. The issue will not go forward without everyone understanding the issues and ramifications. Director Swan said that he wanted to see the proposal address Districts 13 and 14 specifically. Judy will be working with the consultant to finalize the report, including estimating capital needs. She will also be meeting with IRWD staff to go through the report's findings and to get their feed back. Director Swan indicated that if the terms and conditions are right, then he would have no problem with consolidating. Chair Cox said that this issue must be treated as a business decision: Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting Page 4 January 24, 1996 The final report will be presented to the Executive Committee at the February meeting. Any recommendations will be presented to the full Boards for approval. (b) Discussion of Excess Capacity Charge Nancy Wheatley discussed the Staff Report on the Excess Capacity Charge. There are several issues that need to be clamed. First, the Excess Capacity Charge, which was repealed, would have charged businesses that significantly increase their discharges over their permitted limits, as well as new large dischargers coming into the County. When the new ordinance was rescinded, it removed the new business charge and the provision to charge for major increases by existing companies. This has created an inequity between new and existing businesses since under the old ordinance there is no provision to charge for major increases. Staff is requesting approval of a one-year moratorium until a new fee can be developed as part of the Strategic Plan. Any applicants who submit permit applications for either a new connection, or an increase in discharge limits, will be advised that the moratorium is in effect and when the fees are determined, they will be required to pay them. If the new charge is higher than the Excess Capacity Charge (the repealed version) when the fee is finally established, they would be able to pay that fee rather than the new fee. If the charge is lower, the business would be assessed as implemented. The new Strategic Plan will address the issue of which businesses should pay how much for capital charges. The capital charge will apply to businesses that increase their discharge over 50,000 gallons per day, but until then, applicants will be advised that if a firm increases flow, they will not be charged during the moratorium, but will be required to pay when the charge is developed. Director Collins felt that this was the fairest way to handle this issue at this time. Chair Cox said that this issue needs to be looked at more comprehensively, not unlike the SCAQMD did with their business assistance council. We have to let the business community know what we are doing to change our operating procedures to reduce costs, and we need to begin thinking more competitively. Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting Page 5 January 24, 1996 A Newport Beach developer has asked for a waiver of fees for a planned seniors facility. After discussion, staff was directed to advise the applicant that an appeal may be requested from the District 5 directors. The General Manager indicated that it would be advisable for the cities planning and development staff to attend the Strategic Planning sessions so that they are aware of the things being considered and the reasons behind them. Staff was authorized to present to the working Committees and the Boards the recommendation of a moratorium until the new fees are in place. No firm will pay an excess capacity charge at this time, though they will be informed that there will be one eventually and they will be required to pay at that time. The square footage charge will continue, as will the single- family residence fee. Any firm in the permit application cycle will be asked to sign an agreement of understanding. (c) Update on Landfill Acquisition Issues Don McIntyre and Blake Anderson have met or will be meeting with all five of the County supervisors to go over our proposal. They also met with Jan Mittermeier. Supervisor Saltarelli and Ms. Mittermeier believe that the County should maximize the value of the system. Supervisor Steiner appears to understand the political realities and what the cities think about the proposal. Everyone seems to understand the need to get all the cities involved. The big issue is the value of the system. On Monday, IWMD staff advised the Districts that they would not be providing the E&Y evaluation numbers as previously indicated. Ms. Mittermeier stated that the $15 million for 20 years was the floor and they would be working from that. Staff met with Price Waterhouse today, and depending on the assumptions used the value went from a minus $30 million to plus $200 million. If the 75-day period comes and there is no agreement, the County has indicated that they may remove the exclusive negotiating rights and start discussions with others. The General Manager stated that Supervisor Saltarelli indicated he does not think selling the landfills to a private contractor makes sense but privatizing could helpmake the tipping fees go Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting Page 6 January 24, 1996 down. Some of his numbers do not agree with our findings. He also mentioned that the County may want to contract with the Districts to run the system. Director Collins asked that a printout of the various scenarios be available. Blake indicated that they will be ready at next week's Ad Hoc Committee meeting. The County is working towards a resolution to meet the June deadline. d) General Manager Performance Evaluation The General Manager asked if there were any questions on his performance evaluation package. This will be reviewed at the February meeting in closed session. Director McGuigan stated that the goals package was very well done. That section, according to the General Manager, was prepared to show where we were a month ago. The General Manager also mentioned that one weakness of his is over- committing staff. Director Swan asked whether Blake would be able to handle the new Watershed Committee activities in light of his current assignments. Blake indicated that the landfill issue and the bankruptcy are very close to being settled which should allow him more time. Other things that staff are working on are the Executive Management retreat Feb. 1 and 2 to start the '96-97 budget preparation process; the Strategic Plan workshop on Saturday, Jan. 27; the Grand Jury visit January 30; and a presentation to the Business Council that same day. e) Review of Working Committees Pre-agenda Items There are only five items to be considered by the OMTS and/or the PDC Committee in February. Staff will preview them with the Committee Chairs separately. Next month the listings will be submitted to the Steering Committee. (7) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting Page 7 January 24, 1996 (8) OTHER BUSINESS There was no other business discussed. (9) MATTERS TO BE REPORTED AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING The General Manager's evaluation will be discussed at the next meeting, February 28, at time certain 6:15 p.m. (10) MATTERS ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT There were no matters for a future agenda. (11) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next meeting has been scheduled for February 28, 1996 at 5:30 p.m. (12) ADJOURNMENT The Steering Committee adjourned at approximately 7:23 p.m. Submitted by: Jean Tappan, Steering Committee Secretary �cw�2M,. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California P.O. Box 8127• 10844 Ellis Avenue a Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714) 962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 1, 1996, at 5:30 p.m. A regular meeting of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13, and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Thursday, February 1, 1996, at the Districts' Administrative Office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was taken and a quorum declared present, as follows: Planning, Design and Construction Committee: Staff Present: Present: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering John Linder, Construction Manager John Collins, Chair John Cox Shirley Dettloff Others Present: Don Griffin Barry Hammond Mary Lee, John Carollo Engineers Margie Rice Sheldon Singer, Vice Chair Charles Sylvia Absent: Walter K. Bowman Peer Swan Bob Zemel Minutes of Planning, Design and m Construction Committee Meeting Page 2 February 1, 1996 (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments received. (4) APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF JANUARY 4. 1996 MEETING The minutes of the January 4, 1995 Planning, Design and Construction Committee Meeting were approved as written. (5) REPORTS OF COMMITTEE CHAIR, GENERAL MANAGER, ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER, DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING, AND GENERAL COUNSEL (a) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair stated that he would like only necessary staff to take part in the Committee Meetings, and was pleased that only those needed were in attendance at this meeting. (b) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER No report was given. (c) REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER This report was combined with Item (6) below. (d) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING No report was given. (a) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL No report was given. (6) STAFF OVERVIEW OF DISTRICTS' PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES (a) Status Report on Jobs within the Plants and the Districts by the Director of Enoineerina The Director of Engineering gave a status report on Contract No. 5-37-3, Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3, and Balboa Boulevard Sewer Replacement and Abandonment of 47th Street Pump Station Project, City of Newport Beach, concerning construction methods to handle the methane gas problem near the Hoag Hospital entrance on Pacific Coast Highway. y Minutes of Planning, Design and Construction Committee Meeting Page 3 February 1, 1996 He then gave an update on the latest bid opening concerning the Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-353; Process Area Fire Protection, Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job Nos. Pl-38-5 and 132-46; and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2.55. The apparent low bidder was Sverdrup Civil, Inc. In the total amount of$13,196,500.00. The low bid is under the approved Engineer's estimated amount of$13,200,000.00, and is scheduled for award at the February 28, 1996 Board of Directors' Meeting. (7) OLD BUSINESS None to report. (8) ACTIONS RE PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTS (a) Monthly Change Order Report by Director of Engineering on Change Orders approved by the General Manager, Planning, Design and Construction Committee, and Joint Boards. The Director of Engineering reported on the one new Change Order listed on the report. (b) Action items: PDC96-08: Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3, and Balboa Boulevard Sewer Replacement and Abandonment of 47th Street Pump Station Project, City of Newport Beach, Contract No. 5-37-3, authorizing an addition of$232,610.00 to the contract with Wal-Con Construction Company for six items of additional work, increasing the total authorized compensation to an amount not to exceed $2,278,068.03. The Director of Engineering reported on the Change Order. There were questions from the Chair and Committee members concerning undisclosed utilities and changed conditions. The Change Order was discussed in detail and explained to the Committee members. It was moved, seconded and carried to recommend approval of this item. (9) ADDENDA TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS None to report. Minutes of Planning, Design and 4 Construction Committee Meeting Page 4 February 1, 1996 (10) NEW PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS None to report. (11) CONSIDERATION OF NEW AND MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS None to report. (12) CLOSED SESSION The Chair determined that there was no need for a closed session. (13) OTHER BUSINESS, IF ANY Committee members asked to be briefed on the status of the landfill acquisition. Director Collins and Director Cox gave a briefing to explain the process of acquiring the landfill. It was also advised that there will be a Special Meeting of the Board of Directors on Wednesday, February 14, 1996. Committee members also inquired about the status of the Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization. The Director of Engineering reported that the survey for the Space Utilization Study is underway, and should be complete in approximately two weeks. The results, along with an update on the entire project, will then be presented to the Ad Hoc Committee sometime near the end of February. He also reported that the asbestos abatement will be getting started on the old laboratory in the near future. (14) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were no matters discussed. (15) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT There were no matters discussed. (16) NEXT MEETING (a) Joint Boards of Directors Meeting -- Wednesday, February 28, 1996, at 7:30 p.m. (b) Planning, Design and Construction Committee Meeting —Thursday, March 7, 1996, at 5:30 p.m. (c) Executive Committee Meeting — Wednesday, March 20, 1996, at 5:30 p.m. (d) Joint Boards of Directors Meeting —Wednesday, March 27, 1996, at 7:30 p.m. Minutes of Planning, Design and Construction Committee Meeting Page 5 February 1, 1996 (17) OTHER ANNOUNCEMENTS, IF ANY None. (18) ADJOURNMENT The /Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:40 p.m. Qte.Y. L Gail A. Cain Planning, Design and Construction Committee Secretary FIWONLDpCYB1iEB143p1p9.MIN County Sanitation Districts +, of Orange County,California V P.O. Box 8127 • 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Telephone:(714)962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF THE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 7. 1996 - 5:30 P.M. A meeting of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on February 7, 1996, at 5:30 P.M. at the Districts'Administrative offices. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present as follows: Committee Directors Present: Staff Present: Pat McGuigan, Chair Gary Hasenstab, Director of Human Resources Victor Leipzig, Vice Chair Ed Hodges, Director of Maintenance Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications Barry Denes Mark Esquer, Engineering Supervisor, Operations Norman Z. Eckenrode Terri Josway, Safety & Emergency Response Mgr. James M. Ferryman Mark Murphy Chris Norby Sal Sapien Committee Directors Absent: John C. Cox, Jr., Joint Chair (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIRMAN PRO TEM. IF NECESSARY No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments from the public. (4) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR, GENERAL MANAGER, ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER OF OPERATIONS, DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS, DIRECTOR OF MAINTENANCE AND DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES (a) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR No report was given. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Meeting'" Page 2 of 4 February 7, 1995 (b) REPORT OF GENERAL MANAGER No report was given. (c) REPORT OF ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER OF OPERATIONS No report was given. (d) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS Mark Esquer gave a brief report for Bob Ooten on the status of the Districts' polymer contract. He informed the Committee that the subject will be an item on the agenda for the meeting of the Joint Boards on February 28, 1996. (a) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF MAINTENANCE Ed Hodges gave a brief update on the Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) station. Ed also presented the Agenda Calendar, Item (4c) of your agenda package. With regard to the Agenda Calendar, the Committee requested a variation on the schedule to include a rotation of quarterly reports, one per month, by each of the three departments. The Committee would like the reports to include explanations of the techniques being implemented in the individual departments to benchmark and measure how the department is working toward the Districts' goal of a lowering the price per million gallons treated. Charts are requested. (f) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES No report was given. (5) APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 7. 1996 There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held on February 7, 1996, it was moved, seconded and carried that said minutes be deemed approved as mailed. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Meeting Page 3 of 4 February 7, 1996 _ (6) OLD BUSINESS OMTS95.021: Quarterly Report on the Districts' Occupational Injury and Near Miss Accident Rates. Terri Josway gave a presentation and answered the questions of the Committee members. OMTS95-041a: Consideration of motion authorizing staff to enter into an agreement with the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) for a heavy-duty vehicle demonstration project at no cost to the Districts, in prior approval by General Counsel. Ed Hodges gave a presentation after which it was moved, seconded and carried to approve staffs recommendation. OMTS95-041b: Consideration of motion authorizing staff to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding with the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) for a Heavy Duty Vehicle Demonstration Project. Ed Hodges gave a brief presentation after which it was moved, seconded and carried to approve staffs recommendation. (7) CLOSED SESSION The Chair declared there were no items for closed session. (6) OTHER BUSINESS, IF ANY None. (9) MATTERS ON WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING In addition to the changes to.the Agenda Calendar noted in (4)(e) above, the Committee asked staff to report on the efficiency of Central Generation. The Directors again thanked staff for the clean up of the Plant No. 2 "bone yard." Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Meeting Page 4 of 4 February 7, 1996 (10) MATTERS A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT None. (11) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING DATES AND ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AT THOSE MEETINGS None. (12) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:25 P.M. 'a-Clarice M. Marcin Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Secretary RAMDOCWI MK0WrSWINUIESV. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,CalNornia P.O. Box 8127.108"Ellis Avenue -,y Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (7141962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE Wednesday. February 14, 1996. 5:30 P.M. A meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on February 14, 1996 at 5:30 p.m., at the Districts' Administrative Offices. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: Committee Directors Present: Staff Present: John C. Cox, Jr., Joint Chair Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager George Brown, Chair Blake P. Anderson, Assistant General Manager Jan Debay Judith A. Wilson, Assistant General Manager James Flora Gary Hasenstab, Director of Human Resources John M. Gullixson Steve Hovey, Director of Information Technology Wally Lynn Bob Ooten, Director of Operations Thomas Saltarelli Gary Streed, Director of Finance Roger R. Stanton, Vice Chair Nancy Wheatley, Director of Technical Services William G. Steiner Ed Hodges, Director of Maintenance Peer Swan Michael D. White, Controller Steve Kozak, Financial Manager Committee Directors Absent: Linda Eisman, Training Manager Greg Mathews, Principal Administrative Analyst Burnie Dunlap Terri Josway, Safety & Emergency Response Mgr. Mike Peterman, Human Resources Supervisor Other Directors Present: Isiah Mitchell, Training Supervisor Cymantha Atkinson, Financial Analyst Lenora Crane, Committee Secretary Others Present: Tom Woodruff, General Counsel Ruthann Moomy, Callan Associates, Inc. Rita Seymour, PIMCO Gordon Hally, PIMCO (2) APPOINTMENT OF A CHAIRMAN PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 2 February 14, 1996 ' P (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS No comments were made. (4) REPORTS OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR. GENERAL MANAGER. ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGERISI. DIRECTOR OF FINANCE/TREASURER, DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES, DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND GENERAL COUNSEL (a) Report of the Committee Chair The Committee Chair had no report. (b) Report of the General Manager The General Manager had no report. (c) Report of Assistant General Manager - Operations The Assistant General Manager - Operations had no report. Reoort of Assistant General Manager -Administration Judy Wilson, Assistant General Manager, Administration, announced that a manila envelope was placed before each Director containing the Districts' new Employee Handbook, a red book entitled "Human Resources Policies and Procedures," and a copy of the Resolution adopted by the Boards. Every Districts' employee was sent this information, and all of our managers and supervisors will receive training on the policies and procedures. This will ensure that everyone is in compliance and has a good understanding of what is expected. (d) Report of the Director of Finance/Treasurer Finance Director/Treasurer Gary Streed referred to his report contained in the agenda package which provided a history of the Districts' refunding on its variable rate debt. With the successful substitution of the Liquidity Providers on the 1992 Refunding COPs, Moody's has restored the Districts' Aaa rating. *The average daily rate paid in the first six months of FY 1995-96 has been approximately 3.76%. As of today, that rate has dropped to 3.05%, with 3.25% on the refunding. Mr. Streed advised that the Treasurer's Report will be given later in the evening and will appear as a New Business numbered item, in order to facilitate carrying it forward to the Joint Boards. Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 3 February 14, 1996 v In conclusion, Mr. Streed indicated that expanded reports will be given by- Callan Associates, the Districts' third-party Investment Advisor, and Pacific Investment Management Company, the Districts' External Money Manager, regarding the Districts' performance over the first six months. (a) Report of the Director of Human Resources The Director of Human Resources had no report. (f) Report of the Director of Information Technology The Director of Information Technology had no report. (g) Report of General Counsel General Counsel had no report. (5) APPROVAL OF MINUTES - It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the draft minutes of the January 10, 1996, meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee. (6) OLD BUSINESS FAHR96-04 Consideration of motion to approve Resolution No. 96- . extending benefit coverage for regular employees working a reduced work week. This item was brought back to Committee from the January 10, 1996 meeting with a request for further information. In this supplemental report, Mr. Hasenstab reported on the three areas raised by the Committee at the last meeting, specifically, retirement benefits, prevalence of part-time employment in Orange County and other industries, and job sharing. Mr. Hasenstab reported that part- time employees working a minimum of 20 hours are currently covered under the Social Security Act at 7.65% of their hourly rate. Social Security vs. the Districts' retirement system would mean a cost avoidance of$6,400. Public agencies surveyed by the League of California Cities indicated 38% of them provide part- time benefits to their employees, with approximately 90% of other industries providing these benefits. Time-off benefits are prorated based upon hours worked. Job sharing has its pros and cons. To avoid problems, many of these employees sign agreements regarding their benefits so there will be no issue. The Districts' current Employee Benefit Program is specifically limited to full-time employees by Resolution 95-105. Extending employee benefits on a prorated basis to employees who would like to work a reduced work week would enhance the Districts' organizational flexibility through job sharing, more accurately match Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 4 February 14, 1996 P workload requirements with work schedules, potentially reduce overtime costs, - and offer a greater measure of equity to regular employees who do not work a 40-hour week. Staff recommended providing part-time employees with entitlement to employee benefits prorated on the basis of 75 percent, if the employee works on average 30 to 40 hours per week, and 50 percent, if the employee works 20 to 30 hours per week. After discussion, it was moved, seconded and duly carried, with two abstentions, two nays, and four ayes, to recommend amending the provisions of Resolution 95-105 to allow the proration of benefits to part-time employees, and authorize staff to amend MOD's, health plan Summary Plan Documents, and other administrative policy and procedure manuals as necessary, to the Joint Boards of Directors for further consideration. FAHR96-09 Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Report dated January 4. 1996 re the Joint Agreement of the County of Orange. the Official Investment Pool Participants' Committee and Each Option A Pool Participant: and consideration of Resolution No. 96- approving said Agreement. Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager-Operations, reported this item had been held over from the FAHR Committee's January 10, 1996 meeting pending receipt of the County's Financial Disclosure Statement. That statement has been released and the Joint Agreement, the Disclosure Statement and Plan of Adjustment are coincident with each other. Mr. Anderson advised that the Districts are about 6% of the Pool claims, with about $1.3 billion in total claims. By approving the Agreement, it allows the County to improve its position, it improves our place in line in receiving litigation proceeds from Merrill Lynch and others, and gives the schools super priority in that litigation recovery. On an immediate basis, withheld proceeds of$6.2 million held by the County under the existing Comprehensive Agreement would be released to the Districts, and the undisputed portion of the County Administered accounts amounting to $1.3 million will be released immediately. On January 3, 1996, the Orange County Investment Pool (OCIP) Committee reached final agreement with the County on all of the details of the "Joint Agreement of the County of Orange, the Official Investment Pool Participants' Committee and Each Option A Pool Participant" for the resolution of claims against the County of Orange dated December 18, 1995. The Joint Agreement has been conveyed to all Option A participants (the 190 schools, cities, special districts and other public entities that signed the Option A version of the Comprehensive Settlement Agreement that was approved in May 1995)for their individual consideration and approval. Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 5 _y February 14, 1996 After discussion on this item the Committee moved, seconded and duly carried - with one nay vote, to recommend that the Joint Boards approve the "Joint Agreement Proposed by the County of Orange for the Resolution of Pool-Related Claims of Option A Pool Participants, and Other Related Matters." (7) NEW BUSINESS (Please Note: Though the following items were acted on in another sequence, the minutes will reflect them in numerical order for tracking purposes.) FAHR96-10 Consideration of motion to renew Boiler & Machinery Insurance for the period March 1. 1996 to March 1. 1997, with American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance (Kemper Insurance Group), in an amount not to exceed $79,698. Steve Kozak, Financial Manager, reported that the Districts' Boiler & Machinery insurance coverage is due for renewal on March 1, 1996. Robert F. Driver Associates, the Districts' Broker-of-Record, recommends the Districts renew its Boiler and Machinery Insurance with Kemper Insurance for a renewal period effective March 1, 1996 to March 1, 1996, in an amount not to exceed $79,698. The renewal premium adjustment will allow for increases in Districts' property values and is only $2,307 higher than last year's. Driver's recommendation is based on their recent survey which indicates there is a limited number of available underwriters still providing Boiler and Machinery coverage and, those that still do provide this coverage are imposing high deductibles and premiums for large underwritings such as the Districts. It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend renewal of Boiler & Machinery Insurance for the period March 1, 1996 to March 1, 1997, with American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance (Kemper Insurance Group), in an amount not to exceed $79,698. FAHR96-11 Consideration of motion to receive and file PIMCO's First Quarterly Performance Report. Investment Management Program. Steve Kozak introduced Rita Seymour and Gordon Hally of Pacific Investment Management Company (PIMCO), the Districts' extemal money manager, who gave an overview of their company's background, services, processes, procedures, reporting techniques and strategies. Also in attendance was Ruthann Moomy, of Callan Associates, Inc., the Districts' third-party Investment Advisor. Ms. Moomy described Callan's responsibilities to the Districts' and reviewed the Districts' First Quarterly Performance Report. It was moved, seconded and duly carried to receive and file this report. Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 6 February 14, 1996 d FAHR96-12 Consideration of motion to receive and file staff summary report on training. Judy Wilson introduced Linda Eisman who was hired in November 1995, to fill the position of Training Manager. Linda Eisman summarized the Districts' Training Program for the Committee using a slide presentation. Terri Josway, the Districts' Safety & Emergency Response Manager, demonstrated the use of a multi-media computer program on hazard awareness as a training tool. The program allows for testing with a pre-test and post-test feature. The cost to operate this equipment is expected to be as little as $1 per employee. The Training Program is aimed at addressing past problems identified in the Ernst & Young Study completed in 1995, along with recommendations made in other past studies. A centralized record keeping system has begun, and a Training Advisory Committee with representation across departments was formed in September 1995. Ms. Eisman introduced Isiah Mitchell, who was recently hired to fill the newly established Training Supervisor position. This position supports the Training Manager position. The Training Division will be coordinating and centralizing training functions, identifying cost-effective methods and providing data base administration and management of Districts-wide training. It was moved, seconded and duly carried to receive and file this item. FAHR96-13 Consideration of motion to waive Districts' policy in order to retain former employee on a work-order basis. The Districts' Human Resources Policies and Procedures states that any former employee who retires from the agency and forms a business in which he or she is sole proprietor, may not be retained to provide service directly to the Districts for a period of one year subsequent to their last day of employment. Ms. Tuchman requested a waiver of this policy in order to retain Corinne Berenson on a work- order basis. Ms. Berenson, a long-time employee, has been working part-time since April 1995. Her in-depth knowledge of the agency makes her a valuable asset. Providing support on an as-needed basis represents a significant savings to the Districts over part-time employment. It was moved, seconded and duly carried to waive the Districts' policy in order to retain Corrine Berenson on a work-order basis. Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 7 February 14, 1996 v FAHR96-14 Consideration of motion to receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of December 1995. Gary Streed, Districts' Treasurer, reviewed the quarter ended December 31, 1995 Performance Monitoring Reports. Total investments amount to $367,805,049. All Investment Policy requirements are being complied with and performance to date exceeds the index rates. It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve and forward this report to the Joint Boards. FAHR96-15 Consideration of motion to review, approve and file the Mid- . Year Report prepared by staff for the period ending December 31. 1996. Mike White, Controller, introduced his report enclosed in the agenda packet. The bound book is the Districts' first comprehensive Mid-Year Report for the period ending December 31, 1995. The report consolidates both the financial and operational accomplishments of the Districts at the midpoint of the 1995-96 fiscal year. Due to time constraints, it was moved, seconded and duly carried to table this report until the March 13, 1996 meeting. FAHR96-16 Consideration of motion to approve Proposed update to the Districts' Fiscal Policy Statements. Mike White explained that the Fiscal Policy Statements are used to formally define the goals for the financial operations of the Districts and provide the Directors with tools for financial decision-making. The Fiscal Policy was used as a guide in the 1995-96 budget, which also included the status of the Districts' compliance with each of those statements. After reviewing the adopted Fiscal Policy statements, staff is proposing five additional policy statements to ensure the Policy is current and relevant to today's operations. Mr. White reviewed the additional Fiscal Policy Statements. After discussion on this item, it was moved, seconded and duly carried to adopt the proposed update to the Districts' Fiscal Policy Statements with a change to the statement regarding training opportunities to read, 'To provide training opportunities for available jobs within the organization, to the extent possible, for those employees . . ." Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 8 February 14, 1996 P FAHR96-17 Consideration of motion to review and approve 1996-97 Budget Assumptions for use in preparation of Districts' 1996- 97 Budget. Mike White advised that certain assumptions are necessary as a foundation for developing the Districts' budget. The assumptions guide the Board of Directors and Districts' staff in determining the level of wastewater treatment services that will be provided to the community and how these services will be funded. After review and discussion of the 1996-97 Budget Assumptions, it was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the 1996-97 Budget Assumptions and their use in the preparation of the 1996-97 Budget, with a change to the fourth Budget Assumption to read, ". . . earnings on the investment of the Districts' idle operating cash and reserves will be budgeted at six percent." FAHR96-18 Consideration of motion to waive Districts' policy in order to retain former employee on a work-order basis. The Districts' Human Resources Policies and Procedures states that any former employee who retires from the agency and forms a business in which he or she is sole proprietor, may not be retained to provide service directly to the Districts for a period of one year subsequent to their last day of employment. Mr. Hovey requested a waiver of this policy in order to retain Steve Fanizza on a work-order basis. Mr. Fanizza, a Districts' employee of five years standing, recently resigned his position as Programmer Analyst to further his career as an independent software consultant. Mr. Hovey requested Mr. Fanizza be retained on a work-order basis in order to minimize the impact of Mr. Fanizza's resignation and to provide uninterrupted support to Technical Services only until a permanent replacement is recruited. It was moved, seconded and duly carried to waive the Districts' policy in order to retain Steve Fanizza on a work-order basis. (8) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session required. (9) OTHER BUSINESS. IF ANY None. Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 9 February 14, 1996 (10) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING No reports were requested. (11) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT None. (13) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING DATES AND ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AT THOSE MEETINGS The next Committee meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, March 13, 1996. (14) ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 7:15 p.m. Lehora Crane Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Secretary J:%W PDOC\FINICRANEWPC.MLGIFAHR.%kl 6.MINWIFAHR2.% County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California • P.O.Box 8127 a 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 21, 1996, AT 5:30 P.M. A meeting of the Executive Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Wednesday, February 21, 1996. at the Districts' Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT: Present: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel John Sauvajot, Consultant Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair Pat McGuigan, Chair, District 1 and STAFF PRESENT: OMTS Chair John J. Collins, Chair, District 2 and Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager PDC Chair Blake P. Anderson, Asst. Genl. Mgr. George Brown, FAHR Chair Judith A. Wilson, Asst. Genl.. Mgr. Sal A. Sapien, Chair, District 3 Gary Slreed, Director of Finance Jan Debay, Chair, District 5 Steve Kozak, Financial Manager James Ferryman, Chair, District 6 Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary Barry Hammond, Chair, District 7 Victor Leipzig, Chair, District 11 John Gullixson, Chair, District 13 Thomas Saltarelli, Chair, District 14 William Steiner, County Supervisor Don R. Griffin, Past Joint Chair Absent: John Cox, Jr., Joint Chair Roger Stanton, County Supervisor .J Minutes of the Executive Committee Page 2 February 21, 1996 2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM In the absence of Chair Cox, Vice Joint Chair Peer Swan was appointed Chair pro tem. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. (4) APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the January 17, 1996 Executive Committee meeting were approved as drafted. (5) REPORTS OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR, GENERAL MANAGER, AND GENERAL COUNSEL (a) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR There was no report by the Committee Chair or Chair pro tem. (b) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager reported that the next Directors' Workshop on the Strategic Plan is tentatively scheduled for Saturday, May 4, 1996 from 9 to 12. The issues to be addressed are water conservation and reclamation. (c) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL The General Counsel had no report. (6) The Committee moved to address the agenda items as follows: (b) EXEC9"1: Consideration of motion to receive and file draft Feasibility Study on Consolidation. Judy Wilson presented the findings and recommendations of the draft Feasibility Study prepared by Ford Sauvajot Management Group. This item was last before the Boards of Directors in July 1995, and at that time staff recommended that the nine districts be consolidated into one district. In October 1995, this issue was included as one of the critical goals for 1996. There are many regional concerns that must be addressed, including the growing public concern over the number of special districts serving the needs of the California residents, as evidenced by the introduction of the Pringle Bill in Sacramento. The benefits of consolidation include streamlining governance; public perception; average user fees could be reduced; and receiving better bond ratings. The major issues at this time are govemance of the new district and equalization of rates, as well as the issue of District 14 and IRWD. Minutes of the Executive Committee Page 3 February 21, 1996 The new district would be consolidated pursuant to California Government Code pertaining to consolidation or reorganization of Districts, and the governance of the new district would be organized pursuant to either Section 4730 or 4730.1 of the California Health and Safety Code. If the new district is organized under Section 4730, there would be 24 members—one member from each of the 20 cities, one from each of the three sanitary districts and one representing the unincorporated areas of Orange County. IRWD would not have a seat on the board. If formed under Section 4730.1, there would be 30 members—one member from each of the 23 cities (including Garden Grove, Westminster and Costa Mesa), one from each of the three sanitary districts, one from each of the water districts that provide sewer service, and one county representative. Under either section the terms and conditions of existing agreements remain. The only alternatives to the above would be a special legislative act, or amending Section 4730 or 4730.1. Al this time the consultant is recommending organization under Section 4730.1 and including all nine districts in the organization. In the event that the Boards decided to proceed under Section 4730 instead, there are several options available to deal with District 14: 1) organize without District 14 by consolidating 8 districts and providing services through a services agreement with District 14; 2) dissolve District 14 and establish that area as a special zone within IRWD; 3) consolidate into 2 districts-8 districts into one and District 14. There would be a joint board of directors,joint operating agreements between District 14 and the consolidated districts. The other major issue is equalization of user fees. Currently, these fees differ from district to district. Reserves would be maintained and commingled, except for District 14, whose reserves are handled pursuant to the November 1995 agreement. Operating expenses and capital projects would be combined. Nine revenue zones could be established (maintaining existing District boundaries) until such time as rates are equalized, rates could be equalized over a period of time. The subject of debt was also discussed. There is currently$408 million in COPS and $60,000 in General Obligation Bonds. The consultant recommended that the COP debt be assumed by the consolidated district and the GO bonds be retired. Another option would be to create improvement Districts for each issuance, assign the debt accordingly and retire the GO bonds. The time table is as follows: LAFCO Application submittal April 1996 Completion of Consolidation September 1996 Implementation July 1997 Judy also mentioned that each existing District would be asked to pass a resolution approving the consolidation. If one District chooses to oppose, the application can still go ahead and LAFCO may condition approval on inclusion of that District. Minutes of the Executive Committee Page 4 February 21, 1996 Don McIntyre mentioned that a good reason for including the water districts in the new organization would be to help with the water conservation and reclamation plans to be considered by the Directors in May as part of the strategic planning effort. Mr. Sauvajot said that it was his opinion that LAFCO would probably not accept the idea of two districts (consolidating eight districts into one and District 14—IRWD). Director Gullixson expressed concern about getting the issue of user fees before the Directors and addressing the impacts, District by District. He stated that he does not support equalization of fees. Director Sapien stated that because staff is involved with so many issues, he moved that staff complete the landfill and bankruptcy issues and delay any action on consolidation until after the landfill and bankruptcy issues are resolved. Director Hammond indicated that he was would like to hear one compelling reason to continue the consolidation effort. Don McIntyre indicated that he is concerned about the Pringle Bill as well as the State's Constitution Revision Commission that is concerned about the number of governments in California. The Districts sent a letter to Speaker Pringle stating that we are studying the consolidation issue. Don also stated that we should continue to do so before we are forced to by others in a manner we may not agree with. Director Collins said that there are indeed political influences, and that consolidation is the right thing to do because it is an opportunity to reduce governance, it makes sense, and he favors continuing the effort. Director Saltarelli indicated that he cannot accept the equalization of fees and would not attempt to sell the idea to his constituents. Director Leipzig supported the process of consolidation even though it may not save money, and favors forming zones for as long as is necessary. Director McGuigan stated that she thought most of the work had been done and it wouldn't serve any purpose to delay. Judy Wilson indicated that about 85 percent of the work has been completed. The motion was amended to allow staff to complete the work on the consolidation and report back to the Executive Committee in September. It was moved, seconded and passed. (c) EXEC96-03 Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Report re Status of Application to LAFCO for the Formation of a County-wide Sanitation District for Solid Waste Management. Blake Anderson discussed the activities since last Wednesday's Special Board Meeting wherein the Directors authorized staff to submit the MOU with qualifications. On Thursday he talked with Jan Mitlermeier, County CAD, and advised her of the actions by Minutes of the Executive Committee Page 5 February 21, 1996 the Board. Our formal offer will be given to the County tomorrow, February 22, in the form of an MOU and responses to some 40 questions from the County. Jan will be reviewing the offer for about two weeks and will then schedule a study session with the Board of Supervisors in the second week of March, giving them three alternatives to consider. 1) the County would take some of our ideas, including contracting operations and downsizing administration; 2) approving Sanitation Districts' offer of acquisition of the system; 3) consider the policy matters relating to the purchase of the landfill system by private sector. Two weeks after the study session (about the end of March), the issue will be agendized. Jan said that she will not submit the request to submit the LAFCO application until the time the Supervisors formally consider our offer. A package will be sent to all city managers this week that will include the terms. There was additional discussion about acquiring 90% flow control. Chair pro tem Swan indicated that he felt staff should continue to prepare for the possibility of acceptance of our offer by the supervisors by preparing an RFP for forming a team to assist with the bond sale and take it to the FAHR Committee for approval. Director Gullixson asked that a poll be taken to find out where we stand, and how much support there is for our taking over the landfills. There are three regional meetings being scheduled to explain the offer to the city managers and our consultants will be available to assist in discussions. Director Debay complemented staff on the excellent staff report on the LAFCO application and stated that it should be the only information the County should need to make a decision. Director McGuigan stated that many cities are in the process of preparing their budgets and will need the detailed cost information. It was moved, seconded and passed to receive and file the Staff Report. (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file staff report dated February 5, 1996 re the Joint Agreement of the County of Orange, the Official Investment Pool Participants' Committee and Each Option A Pool Participant; and consideration of Resolution No. 96-_, approving said Agreement. Blake Anderson stated that the three parts of the comprehensive settlement agreement have been completed. The Districts have received 80% of their investment. In September 1995 the Joint Agreement went to Sacramento and was modified. In December the action was renewed and the County issued the Plan of Adjustment and the Disclosure Statement. The Joint Agreement transfers $15 million from OCTA to the County, $15 million from the County Landfill System to the County, and $12 million from Harbors, Beaches and Parks, Flood Control District and Redevelopment Agencies. The County will have to issue new debt. Minutes of the Executive Committee Page 6 February 21, 1996 As a result of approving the agreement, the Districts place in the receiving line for - litigation proceeds is improved, and we remove future litigation against the County. As soon as the Bankruptcy Judge accepts the agreement, we will receive withheld monies in the amount of about $8 million. It was moved and seconded to move the approval of the agreement to the full Boards. Director Gullixson slated that our position is not necessarily advanced and that there have been several rulings by Judge Ryan that affect the County's position. He also questioned how good the County's ctaims are. Director McGuigan questioned General Counsel Tom Woodruff about how the pool attorneys fees are being paid. Tom indicated that there are several different structures, depending on whether a city is in a subgroup or not. Most of the fees will be paid from any recovered monies subject to approval by the Court. The Sanitation Districts will be paying about 6%. After calling the motion, it passed with a 7-2 vole. (7) CLOSED SESSION There was no need for a Closed Session. (8) OTHER BUSINESS There was no other business. (9) MATTERS TO BE REPORTED ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. (10) MATTERS ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT. There were none. (11) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Executive Committee meeting is scheduled for March 20, 1996. (12) ADJOURNMENT The Chair pro tem declared the meeting adjourned at 7:10 p.m. milted by J a Tappan, Secrorg pB MIN V JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 28, 1996 Agenda Item (11 )(b)(1 ): PDC95-34: Consideration of the following actions relative to Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-35.3; Process Area Fire Protection, Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job Nos. P1- 385 and 132-46; and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. P255: (a) Verbal report of Director of Engineering . (b) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for said project, changing the date for receipt of bids from January 9, 1996 to January 16, 1996, clarifying contractor's license requirements, and making miscellaneous technical clarifications. (c) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications for said project, making miscellaneous technical clarifications. (d) Consideration of Resolution No. 96-19, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-35-3; Process Area Fire Protection, Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job Nos. Pt-38-5 and P246; and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-55, to Sverdrup Civil, Inc. in the total corrected amount of$13,195.500.00. Summary Seven bids were received on January 16, 1996 for these projects. Sverdrup Civil, Inc.submitted the corrected low bid of$13,196,500.00. The PDC Committee authorized the award of a construction contract at the Joint Boards meeting to the lowest responsive bidder in an amount not to exceed the approved engineer's estimated amount at the November 2, 1995 PDC Committee meeting.The low bid is under the approved Engineer's estimated amount of$13,200,000.00. The plans and specifications were modified through two addenda that accommodated changes requested by the City of Huntington Beach Water Department,clarified details of construction, and extended the bid date by one week from January 9 to January 16, 1996. Staff Recommendation A. That the Joint Boards of Directors recommend approval of Addenda Nos. 1 and 2 to the plans and specifications for the subject project. B. That the Joint Boards of Directors receive,file bid tabulation,and award a contract for Maintenance Building at Plant No.2,Job No.P2-35-3;Process Area Fire Protection,Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant Nos. 1 and 2,Job Nos. P1-38-5 and P246;and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No.2,Job No. P2-55 to Sverdrup Civil, Inc.in the total corrected amount of$13,196,500.00. J\WPDOCBSWG9TFEB9611161 • COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ai ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA January 24, 1996 IBBAA ELO6 AVENUE va.Box 812➢ FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 627262127 p418622An STAFF REPORT PDCSS-34: Consideration of the following actions re Maintenance Building at Plant No.2,Job No.P2-35-3; Process Area Fire Protection,Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plants Nos.1 and 2,Job Nos.P7-38-5 and P2.46;and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No.2,Job No.P2-55. Summary The construction bid package,Warehouse Building at Plant No.2,Job No. P2-35-2;Maintenance Building at Plant No.2,Job No. P-35-3;Process Area Fire Protection,Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No.2,Job No.P248;and Office Trailer Relocations at Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Specification No.M-044(Rebid)and M-044-1,was first approved by the Planning,Design,and Construction (PDC)Committee at the January 5, 1995 meeting. The final approval was to be solicited from the General Board in February 1995,however,due to the bankruptcy,the hem was withheld from the agenda. Subsequent to the above events,the Committee took actions to further delay the project due to questions regarding the warehouse building and the process area fire protection,signage and waste distribution system modifications. Subsequent Board actions have occurred which led to the reorganization of the original package. In June 1995,the Directors approved an amended agreement with Frontier Pacific Insurance Company to settle the dispute regarding Office Trailer Relocations at Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Specification No.M-044 and awarded this project for construction. The Warehouse Building was removed from the package at the direction of the PDC Committee and the Ad Hoc Committee. The Ad Hoc Committee is further reviewing warehouse. In June 1995,the Boards approved the PDC Committees affirmation of the need for the Process Area Fire Protection,Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant Nos.1 and 2. Additionally,in April 1993,the Boards approved a professional services agreement with Black and Veatch to prepare plans and specifications for Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications for Plant No.2,Job No. P2-55 which are now complete. The projects now included in this package are Maintenance Building at Plant No.2,Job No.P2-35-3; Process Area Fire Protection,Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job Nos.P1-38-5 and P2-46; and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No.2,Job No. P2-55. The Maintenance Building,the City Water Pump Station at Plant No.2 and portions of the Chemical and Plant Water Facilities will be constructed in areas adjacent to each other. Since all the plans and specifications for these projects are now complete,staff recommends bidding these facilities together to eliminate construction coordination issues. Including the City Water Modifications at Plant No. 1 in this bid package will allow for batter value since the equipment and materials required for the Plant 1 and Plant 2 projects are similar. At the November PDC Committee meeting,the PDC Committee authorized the award of a construction contract at the next Joint Boards meeting to the lowest responsive bidder in an amount not to exceed the approved engineer's estimated amount. Seven bids were received on January 16, 1996 for these projects. Sverdrup Civil,Inc.,submitted the corrected low bid of$13,196,500.00. The low bid is under the approved Engineer's estimated amount of $13,200,000.00. The plans and specifications were modified through two addenda that accommodated changes requested by the City of Huntington Beach Water Department,clarified details of construction,and extended the bid date by one week from January 9 to January 16, 1996. PDC95-34 Page 2 January 24, 1996 Staff Recommendation A. That the Joint Boards of Directors recommend approval of Addenda 1 and 2 to the plans and specifications for the subject project. B. That the Joint Boards of Directors receive,file bid tabulation,and award a contract for Maintenance Building at Plant No.2,Job No.P2-35-3;Process Area Fire Protection,Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant Nos.1 and 2,Job Nos.P1-38-5 and P2-46;and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No.2,Job No.P2-55,to Sverdrup Civil, Inc.in the total corrected amount of$13.196,500.00. WS:jac JAWPDOC¢NGT2-35-3W WARD.S.RPT COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS January 16, 1996 01 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA r 11:00 a.m. 2 Addenda 1044 CLUB AVENUE PO BOX 6121 BID T A R 11 I A T I n N FOUMAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 8272e.8121 0141 aa2.2411 Jobs Nos. P2353, P1-38.5 & P2.46, and P2-55 PROJECT TITLE: Maiptananra Reading at Plant No 7 Anh Nn P7AR.9 Pronaas An,, E r, . Protection Cignagn A Water nintrihntian Syntam Mndifiratinns at Plants Nna 1 Fnr�lily Mad'frarinne at PI nt Nn. A .Inh Nn P7_R5 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: New fuln'ritaruenra R,'Id•ng now city warier pump Arai nn and d'ctdh nine evatem and 'mnTnvemantc and raw rhAmiral dne'nn fndl'tiac At Plant Nn 7 City water numn station imnrnyemAnta and dictrih,it na ystpnn n wore at Plsnt Nn 1 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE: SIg 2miIU= BUDGET AMOUNT: SIX 8715Onn TOTAL CONTRACTOR BID 1. Sverdrup Civil, Inc., Costa Mesa, CA 13,196,500.00•• 2. S. J. Amoroso Construction Co., Inc., Irvine, CA 14,700,733.00 3. Pascal & Ludwig Engineers, Ontario, CA 14,821,000.00 4. Kiewit Pacific Co., Santa Fe Springs, CA 14,989,605.00 5. Ziebarth & Alper and C.S. Alper Construction Co., a joint venture, Huntington Beach, CA 15,655,000.00 6. Margate Construction, Carson, CA 15,961,000.00 7. Advance Constructors, division of Zurn Constructors, Inc. Upland CA 16,086,731.00 8. 9. 10. "corrected total I have reviewed the proposals submitted for the abov rolect and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. 1, therefore, recommend award to Sverdrup Ci , In . in the bi amount of $13,196,500 as the lowest and best bid. David A. Ludwin, P.E. Director of Engineering BID SUMMARY JOB NOS. P2-35-3, P1-38-5, 122-06 and P2-55 Bid Date: January 16, 1996 SYerGrup CIWI,IM. 5.1.Amoroso Pascal&Lu4wlg Engineers AcNa=Conprumas Dmioc,, Comhuc0on Co.,Inc. alum Consbuclois.Irtc. Item 017. UN1 Price Total Pure Unit Price Total Price Unit Price Total Pace Unit Pace Total Price No. 1 1 LS 250.= 250.000.00 250.OD0 250.000.00 25D,0W 250,000.00 25D.000 250.000.00 2 1 LS SOW 5,000.W 1,W0 1000.00 2 W0 2 W0.00 B WO UDD.00 3 1 LS 5,000,000 5,000,W0.00 6.707,874 6,707,874.00 4,705,000 4,705,OOg.00 5.700.000 5,700,000.00 4 1 LS 5,000 S,WO.W 4,ODD 4,0D0.00 20D0 1 2.000.00 40,000 40.000.00 5 1 1 LS 1 1,8W.W0 1,800,000.00 2.100,000 2,100,000.00 22DDDDO 2,2W.WO.00 I 2.3W,W0 2,300,000.00 6 1 LS 2,500.000 2,500.000.W 2.000.00D 2,000,000.00 2556000 2.556.000.00 2.500.00O 2.500.OW.00 7 1 LS 300.000 3W,O00.W 126.257 126.257.W 2900W 29D.000.00 301.000 301.0W.00 8 1 LS 120,000 120,000.W 29.702 29.702.00 700DO 70,0M00 90.631 90.631.00 9 1LS 20.000 20.000.W 100,OW 100,OW.00 150000 150,000.00 150,OW 150,WO.01) 10 1 LS 2.3W.O00 2,300,0W.00 2,300,OW 2,300,OW.00 3945000 3,945,000.W 3,GB5,100 3,685,100.00 11 1 LS B50.000 W0,O0D.00 1,000.OW 1.000.OW.00 5750W 575.000.00 900,OW 9W.000.00 12 SW 11 S,SW.W 40.7 20.350.W 36 18.WO.W W .W 62 31, O Cy 13 5W 11 5,500.00 39.6 19,800.00 33 16,50D.00 51 25.500W Cy 14 500 11 5.500.00 38.5 19.250.00 33 16,500.00 46 23.000.00 Cy SUlaoial 13,166,5=0— 14,678,233.00 14,796.WO.00 16,W4.23100 BWIEer's All ll $30,WW W W0 O. S22,SW. f25, .W W f82,5W. Risk Im A TOTAL 613.196.500.00" $14,70D.733.00 $14.821,00O.00 $16.086,73100 "Corre total. BID SUMMARY JOB NOS. P2-35-3, P1-38-5, P246 AND P2-55 BID DATE: JANUARY 16, 1996 I0ew0 Pacific Co. ZlebeM 8 Alper and C.S.Alper wrgate Conatmetion ConsImceon Co.,a pIM venture Item Cot. Unit Price Total Pd. Unit Price Total Pd. Unu Price Total Price No. 1 1 LS 250,000 250.000.W 250000 250.000.00 25ODDO 250,000.00 2 1LS 2000 2.0010.00 3WW 30,000.00 20000 20,000.00 3 1 LS 5W7000 S.8W.000.410D 77640DO 7,754,0011.00 5721000 5.721.000.00 a 1 LS 20DO 2,000.00 4DDDDO 4W.OW.00 125W0 125,WO.00 5 1 LS 2WOD00 2,800,000.00 15DDOW i.5W,W0.00 2400000 2,400.0101).00 6 1 LS 29DDDW 2,900,013D.00 22DDDDD 2.Y00,0100.W 26501M 2.65D.0W.00 7 1 LS 118250 118,25D.00 280000 260.0130.W 265800 205.000.W 8 1LS 28855 29,855.W 8WW 80,00O.00 8WW 80.011 .W 9 1LS 2WD 2.000.00 5WWD SW.WO.W 111W0 100.010O.W 10 1L6 I 230OWD 2,300,000.00 I 18WW0 1,800,000.00 345OWD 3,460.13W.01) 11 1LS 1000WD 1.000,000.01) 8WWD 000.11113000 800W0 8W.W0.01) 12 5WCY 70 35,000.00 30 15.0O.00 20 10,01DO.W 13 SW CY W 30,000.W 30 15,000.00 15 7,5W.W 14 500 CY 55 27,500.00 30 15.000.W 15 7.500.00 Subtotal 14,963,605.00 15,629,WO.W 15,886,003.00 Builder's All Risk 826,DW.00 $26,WO.W $75,WO.00 Insumr e TOTAL S14W9.605W S15,655,(=00 S15W."m Y JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING 7F FEBRUARY 28, 1996 Agenda Item (11)(b)(2)(a): QMTS95-041a: Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to enter into an agreement with South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD)for a Heavy-Duty Vehicle Demonstration project at no cost to the Districts, in form approved by General Counsel. Summary In September 1995, the Districts received confirmation that our proposal to do a heavy-duty demonstration project, using monies supplied by the SCAQMD, was going to be approved. In December 1995, the SCAQMD Board of Directors met and approved the project. The contract between the Districts and the SCAQMD has been reviewed by our General Counsel and includes all of their suggested modifications. (Please see attached contract.) Ed Hodges, Director of Maintenance will give a brief presentation on this item. Also, please see attached staff report. Budget Information There is no budgetary impact. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the OMTS Committee approve this item to be moved forward for authorization by the Joint Boards for staff to enter into an agreement with the Southern California Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD)for a heavy-duty vehicle demonstration project. OMTS Committee Recommendation The OMTS Committee recommends the Joint Boards authorize staff to enter into an agreement with the Southern California Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD)for a heavy-duty vehicle demonstration project. J:1W PDDCW%G WTE B961i 1 B2-A ' n V �b January 23, 1996 STAFF REPORT OMTS95-041a: Consideration of motion authorizing staff to enter into an agreement with the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) for a heavy-duty vehicle demonstration project at no cost to the Districts, in prior approval by General Counsel. In September 1995, the Directors will recall that staff submitted a proposal to the SCAQMD for the Heavy Duty demonstration project. In December 1995, the SCAQMD Board of Directors met and approved our project. As part of this proposal, the SCAQMD will be providing $447,000 in funds. The mechanics of this proposal have been discussed in great detail a number of times and as a result will not be discussed here. The Districts have been requested to enter into a contract with the SCAQMD for this work. Attached for your guidance and information is the Final version of the Contract. Staff as well as our General Counsel have been working with the SCAQMD staff in preparing this contract for your approval. Ed Hodges, Director of Maintenance will give a brief presentation on this item. Budget Information There is no monetary impact to executing this contract. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the OMTS Committee approve this item to be moved forward for authorization by the Joint Boards for staff to enter into an agreement with the Southern California Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) for a heavy-duty vehicle demonstration project. EEH:cm R:WVPDOCt33101EHtOMTS%95-D41A.SR CSDOC 9 P.O.Box 8127 0 Fountain Valley.CA 92 7 28-812r 0 (7t<)962 2411 -� Page -1- Contract No.96066 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT CONTRACT This Contract consists of 13 pages. 1. PARTIE -The parties to this Contract are the South Coast Air Quality Management District (referred to here as 'DISTRICT') whose address Is 21865 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765, and County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (referred to here as 'CONTRACTORI whose address Is 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, CA 92708-7018. 2. RECITALS A. DISTRICT is the local agency with primary responsibility for regulating stationary source air pollutlon in the South Coast Air Basin in the State of California. DISTRICT is authorized to enter Into this Contract under California Health and Safety Code Section 40489. DISTRICT desires to contract with CONTRACTOR for services described in Attachment 1 -Work Statement, attached here and made a part here by this reference. CONTRACTOR warrants that it Is well-qualified and has the experience to provide such services on the terms set forth here. B. CONTRACTOR Is authorized to do business In the State of California and attests that it is in good tax standing with the California Franchise Tax Board. C. Ail parties to this Contract have had the opportunity to have this contract reviewed by their attorney. D. CONTRACTOR agrees to obtain the required licenses, permits, and all other appropriate legal authorizations from all applicable federal,state and local jurisdictions and pay all applicable fees. 3. PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS A. CONTRACTOR warrants that it holds all necessary and required licenses and permits to provide these services. CONTRACTOR further agrees to Immediately notify DISTRICT in writing of any change in its licensing status. B. CONTRACTOR shall submit reports to DISTRICT as outlined In Attachment 1 - Work Statement All _ reports shall be submitted in an environmentally friendly format: recycled paper: stapled, not bound; black and white, double-sided print; and no three-ring, spiral, or plastic binders or cardstock covers. DISTRICT reserves the right to review, comment.and request changes to any report produced as a result of this Contract. C. CONTRACTOR shall perform all tasks set forth in Attachment 1 -Work Statement, and shall not engage, during the term of this Contract in any performance of work that Is in direct or indirect conflict with duties and responsibilities set forth in Attachment 1 -Work Statement. D. CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for exercising the degree of skill and care customarily required by accepted professional practices and procedures subject to DISTRICTS final approval which DISTRICT will not unreasonably withhold. Any costs incurred due to the failure to meet the foregoing standards, or otherwise defective services which require re-performance, as directed by DISTRICT, shall be the responsibility of CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR'S failure to achieve the performance goals and objectives stated in Attachment 1-Work Statement, is not a basis for requesting re-performance unless work conducted by CONTRACTOR Is deemed by DISTRICT to have failed the foregoing standards of performance. E. CONTRACTOR shall ensure, through its contracts with any subcontractor(s), that employees and agents performing under this Contract shall abide by paragraph D above. 4. TERM - The term of this Contract Is from January 2, 1996 to May 1, 1999, unless further extended by amendment of this Contract In writing. No work shall commence until this Contract is fully executed by all parties. Page -2- 5. TERMINATION-In the event any party taus to comply with any tens or condition of this Contract or fails to fl provide the services In the manner agreed upon by the parties. Including, but not limited to,the requirements of Attachment 1 -Work Statement, this failure shall constitute a breach of the Contract The nonbreaching party shall either notify the breaching party that it must cure this breach or provide written notification of Its intention to terminate this Contract Notification shall be provided In the manner set forth In Clause 11. The nonbreaching party reserves all rights under law and equity to enforce this Contract and recover any damages. DISTRICT reserves the right to terminate this Contract for nonbreach and will reimburse CONTRACTOR for actual costs incurred In performance of this Contract through the effective date of termination for nonbreach. 6. INSURANCE- CONTRACTOR Is permissibly self-Insured and will maintain self-Insurance In accordance with applicable provisions of California law as evidenced by certificate of self-Insurance. CONTRACTOR sfa0 maintain such coverage during the term of this Contract and any Wensions thereof. If CONTRACTOR falls to maintain the required Insurance coverage, DISTRICT reserves the right to terminate the Contract or purchase such additional Insurance and bill CONTRACTOR or deduct the cost thereof from any payments owed to CONTRACTOR. 7. INDEMNIFICATION - CONTRACTOR agrees to hold harmless. Indemnify, and defend DISTRICT, Its officers, employees, agents, representatives, and successors4n4nterest against any and all loss, damage, cost, or expenses which DISTRICT, Its officers, employees, agents, representatives, and successors-In-Interest may Incur or be required to pay by reason of any Injury or property damage caused or Incurred by CONTRACTOR, Its employees, subcontractors, or agents in the performance of this Contract 8. TERMS AND CONDITIONS A. CONTRACTOR shall obtain oofurding as follows: Pima Gro Systems, Inc., One Hundred Ninety-Two Thousand Seven Hundred Dollars ($192,700) direct; Southern California Gas Company, Ninety-Three Thousand Five Hundred Dollars($93,500) In-kind; Power Systems Associates, Eight Hundred Thirty-EIgM Thousand Two Hundred Fifty-Nine Dollars (5838,259) in-kind; Department of Energy, Eighty Thousand Dollars ($80,000) in-kind. B. If CONTRACTOR fails to obtain funding In the amounts referenced above from the respective parties, then DISTRICT reserves the right to renegotiate or terminate this Contract C. CONTRACTOR agrees to provide funding to cost share this project in the amount of Eight Hundred Thirty-Five Thousand Three Hundred Seventy-Four Dollars ($835,374). If CONTRACTOR falls to provide funding in this amount,then DISTRICT reserves the right to renegotiate or terminate this Contract 9. - PAYMENT A. DISTRICT shall pay CONTRACTOR a fast price of Four Hundred Forty-Seven Thousand Dollars (W7,000)for work performed under this Contract in accordance with Attachment 2-Payment Schedule, attached here and Included here by reference. Payment shall be made by DISTRICT to CONTRACTOR within thirty (30) days after approval by DISTRICT of an Invoice prepared and furnished by CONTRACTOR showing services performed and referencing tasks and deliverables as shown In Attachment 1 -Work Statement. and the amount of charge claimed. Each Invoice must be prepared In duplicate, on company letterhead, and list DISTRICTS Contract number, period covered by invoice,and CONTRACTORS social security number or Employer Identification Number and submitted to: South Coast Air Quality Management District, Attn:Maria Belknap. B. An amount equal to ten percent (10%) shall be withheld from all charges paid until satisfactory completion and Oral acceptance of work by DISTRICT. Page •3- 10, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIOHTS -Thle and full ownership rights to any software, documents, or reports developed under this Contract shall at all times remain with CONTRACTOR. Such material is agreed-to be CONTRACTOR'S proprietary Information. A. Rights of Technical Data-DISTRICT shall have the unlimited right to use technical data. Including material designated as a trade secret, restating from the performance of services by CONTRACTOR under this Cwaram CONTRACTOR shall have the right to use data for Its own benefit B. Copyright-CONTRACTOR agrees to grant DISTRICT a royalty frea, nonexclusive, Irrevocable license to produce, translate, publish, use, and dispose of all copyrightable material first produced or composed In the performance of this Contract 11. NOTCES -Any notices from either parry to the other shall be given in writing to the attention of the persons listed below, or to other such addresses or addressees as may hereafter be designated In writing for notices by either party to the other. Notice shall be given by certified, express, or registered mad, return receipt requested,and shall be effective as of the date of receipt Indicated on the return receipt card. DISTRICT: South Coast Air Quality Management District 21865 E.Copley Drive Diamond Bar,CA 91765 Attn: Cindy Sullivan CONTRACTOR: County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ella Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92700-7018 Attn: Board Secretary 12 EMPLOYEES OF CONTRACTOR A. DISTRICT reserves the right to review the resumes of any of CONTRACTORS employees selected to perform the work specified here and to disapprove CONTRACTORS choices. CONTRACTOR warrants that It will employ no subcontractor without written approval from DISTRICT. CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for the cost of regular pay to Its employees, as well as cost of vacation, vacation replacements,sick leave, severance pay and pay for legal holidays. _ B. CONTRACTOR, its officers, employees, agents, or representatives stall In no sense be considered employees or agents of DISTRICT, nor shall CONTRACTOR, its officers, employees, agents, or representatives be entitled to or eligible to participate in any benefits, privileges, or plans, given or extended by DISTRICT to its employees. 13. CONFIDENT1ALfTY- It Is expressly understood and agreed that DISTRICT may designate In a conspicuous manner the Information which CONTRACTOR obtains from DISTRICT as confidential and CONTRACTOR agrees to: A. Observe complete confidentiality with respect to such Information, Including without limitation, agreeing not to disclose or otherwise permit access to such Information by any other person or entity In any manner whatsoever, except that such disclosure or access shall be permitted to employees of CONTRACTOR requiring access in fulfillment of the services provided under this Contract B. Ensure that CONTRACTORS officers, employees, agents, representatives, and Independent contractors are Informed of the confidential nature of such Information and to assure by agreement or otherwise that they are prohibited from copying or revealing, for any purpose whatsoever, the contents of such Infor attlon or any part thereof, or from taking any action otherwise prohibited under this paragraph. C. Not use such Information or any part thereof in the performance of services to others or for the benefit of others In any form whatsoever whether gratuitously or for valuable consideration, except as permitted under this ContracL D. Notify DISTRICT promptly and in writing of the circumstances surrounding any possession, use, or knowledge of such information or any part thereof by any person or amity other than those authorized by this paragraph. Page -4- D E. Take at CONTRACTOR'S expense, but at DISTRICTS option and in any event under DISTRICTS control, any legal action necessary to prevent unauthorized use of such information by any third party or-entlly which has gained access to such Information at least in part due to the fault of CONTRACTOR. F. Take any and all other actions necessary or desirable to assure such continued confidentiality and protection of such information. G. Prevent access to such by any person or entity not authorized under this Contract H. Establish specific procedures In order to fulfill the obligations of this paragraph. 14. PUBLICATION A. DISTRICT shall have the right of prior written approval of any document which shall be disseminated to the public by CONTRACTOR in which CONTRACTOR utilized information obtained from DISTRICT In connection with performance under this Contract. B. Information, data, documents, or reports developed by CONTRACTOR for DISTRICT, pursuant to this Contract,shall be part of DISTRICTS public record unless otherwise Indicated. CONTRACTOR may use or publish, at its own expense, such information provided to DISTRICT. The following acknowledgment of support and disclaimer must appear in each publication of materials, whether copyrighted or not, based upon or developed under this Contract. This report was prepared as a result of work sponsored, paid for, in whole or in part, by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (DISTRICT). The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of DISTRICT. DISTRICT, Its officers, employees, contractors, and subcontractors make no warranty, expressed or Implied,and assume no legal liability for the Information in this report. DISTRICT has not approved or disapproved this report nor has DISTRICT passed upon the accuracy or adequacy of the Information contained herein.' C. CONTRACTOR shall Informs officers, employees, and subcontractors Involved In the performance of this Contract of the restrictions contained herein and require compliance with the above. 15. NON-DISCRIMINATION - In the performance of this Contract CONTRACTOR shall not discriminate in recruiting, hiring, promotion, demotion, or termination practices on the basis of race, religious creed, color, national origin,ancestry,sex,age,or physical or mental disability and shall comply with the provisions of the CaTrfomia Fair Employment & Housing Act (Government Code Section 12900 at seq.), the Federal Civil Rights Act of.1964 (P.L 80-352) and all amendments thereto, Executive Omer No. 11246 (30 Federal Register 12319), and all administrative rules and regulations Issued pursuant to said Acts and Order. CONTRACTOR shall likewise require each subcontractor to comply with this paragraph and shall include in each such subcontract language similar to this paragraph. 16. SOLICITATION OF EMPLOYEES-CONTRACTOR expressly agrees that CONTRACTOR shall not,during the term of this Contract, nor for a period of six months after termination, solicit for employment, whether as an employee or Independent contractor,any person who is or has been employed by DISTRICT during the term of this Contract without the consent of DISTRICT. 17. PROPERTY AND SECURITY - Without limiting CONTRACTOR'S obligations with regard to security, CONTRACTOR shall comply with all the rules and regulations established by DISTRICT for access to and activity in and around DISTRICTS premises. 1a. ASSIGNMENT-The rights granted hereby may not be assigned, sold, licensed, or otherwise transferred by either parry without the prior written consent of the other, and any attempt by either parry to do so shall be void upon Inception. 19. NON-EFFECT OF WAIVER-The failure of CONTRACTOR or DISTRICT to insist upon the performance of any or all of the terms, covenants, or conditions of this Contract, or failure to exercise any rights or remedies hereunder, shall not be construed as a waiver or relinquishment of the future performance of any such terms, covenants, or conditions, or of the future exercise of such rights or remedies, unless otherwise provided for herein. Page -5- 20. ATTORNEYS' FEES -In the event any action Is filed In connection with the enforcement or interpretation of this Contract, each party shall bear its own attomeys'fees and costs. 21. FORCE MAJEURE -Neither DISTRICT nor CONTRACTOR shall be liable or deemed to be in default for any delay or failure In performance under this Contract or interruption of services resulting, directly or indirectly, from acts of God, civil or military authority, acts of public enemy, war, strikes, labor disputes, shortages of suitable parts, materials, labor or transportation, or any similar cause beyond the reasonable control of DISTRICT or CONTRACTOR. 22. SEVERABILffY-In the event that any one or more of the provisions contained In this Contract shall for any reason be held to be unenforceable in any respect by a court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect any other provisions of this Contract, and the Contract shall then be construed as If such unenforceable provisions are not a part hereof. 23. HEADINGS - Headings on the paragraphs of this Contract are for convenience and reference only, and the words contained therein shall in no way be held to explain, modify, amplify, or aid In the Interpretation, construction, or meaning of the provisions of this Contract. 24. DUPLICATE EXECUTION -This Contract is executed in duplicate. Each signed copy shall have the force and effect of an original. 25. GOVERNING LAW-This Contract shall be construed and Interpreted and the legal relations created thereby shall be determined In accordance with the laws of the State of California. Venue for resolution of any disputes under this Contract shall be Los Angeles County,California. 26, CITIZENSHIP AND ALIEN STATUS A CONTRACTOR warrants that it fully complies with all laws regarding the employment of aliens and others, and that its employees performing services hereunder meet the citizenship or alien status requirements contained In federal and state statutes and regulations including, but not limited to, the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (P.L 99-603). CONTRACTOR shall obtain from all covered employees performing services hereunder all verification and other documentation of employees' eligibility status _. required by federal statutes and regulations as they currently exist and as they may be hereafter amended. CONTRACTOR shall have a continuing obligation to verify and document the continuing employment authorization and authorized alien status of employees performing services under this Contract to insure continued compliance with all federal statutes and regulations. B. Notwithstanding paragraph A above, CONTRACTOR, in the performance of this Contract, shall not discriminate against any person in violation of 8 USC Section 1324b. C. CONTRACTOR shall retain such documentation for all covered employees for the period described by law. CONTRACTOR shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless DISTRICT, its officers and employees from employer sanctions and other liability which may be assessed against CONTRACTOR or DISTRICT, or both in connection with any alleged violation of federal statutes or regulations pertaining to the eligibility for employment persons performing services under this Contract. 27. ENTIRE CONTRACT -This Contract represents the entire agreement between the parties hereto related to CONTRACTOR providing services to DISTRICT and there are no understandings, representations, or warranties of any kind except as expressly set forth herein. No waiver, alteration, or modification of any of the provisions herein shall be binding on any party unless In writing and signed by the parry against whom enforcement of such waiver, alteration, or modification is sought Page -6- G IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Contract have caused this Contract to be duly executed on their behalf by their authorized representatives, SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGECOUNTY By By: Jon D. Mikels, Chairman of the Board Date: Date: ATTEST: Jackie Dix, Clerk of the Board Approved as to form: THOMAS L. WOODRUFF, DISTRICTS'COUNSEL By By APPROVED AS TO FORM: TERRY C.A 1NDRUS Peter Greenwald, District Counsel (� ATTACHMENT 1 STATEMENT OF WORK FOR COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CONTRACTOR proposes to demonstrate a Caterpillar 3176B dual-fuel engine (31768) in ten heavy-duty trucks used to transport municipal biosolids from Fountain Valley to Kern County. The 3176E uses a small quantity of diesel to start the engine through low RPM operation and then switches to natural gas (NG) operation. NG usage is expected to be 90% or better. Ten trucks shall be repowered with the 3176B and three control trucks shall continue to operate on standard 3176 diesel engines. Each truck shall make the approximately 300-mile round trip to Kern County twice a day. Battelle Memorial Institute shall provide technical support to the demonstration. Demonstration vehicles shall be provided by Pima Gro Systems, Inc. (Pima Gro). Pima Gro is currently under contract with CONTRACTOR to transport biosolids from Fountain Valley to Kern County. The total cost of this demonstration is anticipated to be $2,486,824. Co-sponsors include CONTRACTOR ($835,374-direct), the Gas Company (SCG) ($93,500-in-kind), Pima Gro Systems, Inc. ($192,700-direct), Power Systems Associates ($838,250-in-kind), the Department of Energy ($80,000-in-kind), and DISTRICT ($447,000-direct). Specific tasks necessary to accomplish this demonstration are defined.below. Task 1 Memorandum of Understanding CONTRACTOR shall develop a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between CONTRACTOR, SCG, Pima Gro Systems, Inc. (Pima Gro), and Power Systems Associates (PSA). The MOU shall detail the responsibilities of each party, including the specific trucks to be repowered, the engines and fuel systems to be installed, and the disposition of the 3176 and 3176E engines at the end of the demonstration. CONTRACTOR shall provide DISTRICT with a copy of the fully-executed MOU. Task 2 Engines and Vehicles 2.1 CONTRACTOR shall coordinate delivery of ten GMC trucks to PSA facilities in the Basin for installation of Caterpillar 3176B dual-fuel engines in ten trucks, along with on-board fuel storage and delivery systems. CONTRACTOR anticipates that this installation process shall proceed at the rate of two trucks per month. 2.2 Upon completing engine installation, CONTRACTOR, in cooperation with Pima Gro, shall conduct acceptance testing on each truck to ensure that each truck operates safely and provides acceptable performance. Acceptance testing shall include, but not be limited to, takeoff and acceleration tests, and braking tests. 2.3 CONTRACTOR, in cooperation with Pima Gro, shall identify three control vehicles. These diesel-fueled trucks shall be identically (or nearly identical) configured as the CNG trucks. The control vehicles shall be operated on similar routes with similar loads to permit accurate comparison of operating data. 2.4 CONTRACTOR shall coordinate efforts with PSA to optimize the 3176B engine emissions to 2.5 g/bhp-hr. NOx. CONTRACTOR may accomplish this using dynamometer facilities located at PSA In the event that the PSA dynamometer is unavailable, CONTRACTOR may use other facilities. 1 Task 3 Refueling Facility Establishment 3.1 CONTRACTOR shall install a natural gas refueling facility at its Fountain Valley 9 facility. The fueling facility shall consist of, but not be limited to, the following major components: a) One 500-1,000 standard cubic feet per minute non-tube compressor package. b) Two dual hose CNG dispensers (fast fill) to allow for private and public access to the fueling facility. c) Three CNG storage vessels. Vessels must meet American Society of Mechanical Engineers specifications. d) One dual-tower, suction-side gas dryer. e) One electrical switchboard. f) Two fuel card readers, to accommodate private and public access. 3.2 CONTRACTOR shall consult with appropriate representatives of SCG to determine the applicable technical specifications for each fueling facility component. 3.3 CONTRACTOR shall issue a Request for Proposals (RFP) for design, permitting, and construction of the refueling facility. CONTRACTOR, in conjunction with SCG, shall form a construction management team to manage all aspects of the engineering design phase for the facility, including but not limited to, adherence to applicable codes and safety and environmental regulations, development of equipment specifications, RFP preparation, bid analysis, equipment procurement, contractor selection, construction management, start-up and debug services, and operator training. Task 4 Field Test and Data Collection 4.1 CONTRACTOR shall develop a field test plan for the CNG and diesel control trucks. This test plan shall include, but not be limited to, route(s) to be traveled for each vehicle, refueling requirements, and vehicle scheduling requirements. The plan shall also include information regarding chassis manufacturer and model, engine specifications, and vehicle load characteristics. 4.2 CONTRACTOR shall organize and conduct a one-to two-hour training class for all of its personnel who shall operate, service, or otherwise be involved with the CNG trucks. Training shall include, but not be limited to, issues related to CNG vehicle operation, maintenance, refueling procedures, and data collection requirements. 4.3 CONTRACTOR shall make arrangements with PSA to provide spare parts inventory for the CNG engines. CONTRACTOR may store these parts at its facility or at PSA facilities. 4.4 CONTRACTOR shall collect operational and maintenance data on each of the ten CNG trucks and the three diesel control vehicles. This data shall include, but not be limited to, mileage accumulated, driving cycle characteristics, fuel consumption (including information on percentage or ratio of CNG and diesel use under actual vehicle operating conditions), driver and service personnel reaction to operation and maintenance of the vehicles and engines, and a record of repairs and maintenance performed. 2 b Task 5 Emissions Testing 5.1 CONTRACTOR shall develop an emissions lest plan with which to coordinate and manage chassis emissions tests during the term of the demonstration. This plan shall include, but not be limited to, identification of the proposed testing facility, number of vehicles to be tested, test cycles to be used, and exhaust species to be measured. 5.2 Prior to the start of vehicle operation, CONTRACTOR shall obtain and provide to DISTRICT all engine emissions data available for the CNG and control engines. This data may be obtained from the engine manufacturer or from an independent source. 5.3 CONTRACTOR shall prepare a final emissions report, to be incorporated in the final report. In the final emissions report, CONTRACTOR shall compare chassis dynamometer lest data obtained in Task 5.1 with the engine test data obtained in Task 5.2. The project goal is an engine with exhaust emissions of 2.5 g/bhp-hr. or less for NOx and with fuel economy and power comparable to corresponding diesel engines. CONTRACTOR shall analyze all emissions and performance data, and provide an assessment on the emissions impact of the demonstration vehicles over their useful life. 3 DELIVERABLES In addition to the deliverables set forth in the Statement of Work, CONTRACTOR shall deliver the following to DISTRICT under this Contract: 1. Two stapled copies of each bi-monthly progress report due by the 10th day of each month following the two-month reporting period. CONTRACTOR shall submit one copy of each bi-monthly progress report to DISTRICTS Program Supervisor and one copy to DISTRICTS TA Staff Specialist assigned to contracts in conjunction with the invoice for the same period. Each bi-monthly progress report shall include, but not be limited to, the following: a. Reference to DISTRICT contract number, project number and title. b. Reporting time period (month, year). c. Description of work completed during the reporting period, a discussion of problems encountered and how those problems were solved, and other relevant activities. d. Discussion of work planned for the next reporting period. e. Discussion of project status with respect to time schedule and steps f. Discussion of cost status with respect to budget status and work completed to date, costs to date, explanation of any overruns, and steps being taken to bring costs back into line. 2. One copy of the draft final report shall be submitted to DISTRICTS Program Supervisor, and one copy to DISTRICTS TA Staff Specialist assigned to contracts no later than February 15, 1999. This document shall, in conformance with the California Public Records Act (Government Code Section 6250 at seq.) be considered in the public domain. Any trade secret information may be submitted to DISTRICT in a separate report in which the document is identified as containing trade secrets on every page. DISTRICT agrees to treat trade secret information in accordance with its Public Records Act guidelines relating to trade secret information. In this report, CONTRACTOR shall document all test results and provide a discussion of the data and results along with a statistical analysis that either recommends validation or invalidation of the test protocol. Specifically, this report shall contain, but not be limited to, the following: a. Reference to DISTRICT contract number and project title. b. Project background and objectives. c. A detailed description of the scope of work. d. Emissions data, analysis, and interpretations, including correlation between manufacturer testing and chassis testing results. e. Technical description of the dual-fuel engine technology, and its performance in the demonstration. f. Summary of results of each task. g. Appendices of all test data and calculations. 4 h. Description of the use and performance of each dual-fuel truck in comparison to the three control vehicles. I. A discussion of operational economics, including fuel economy, cost of fuel,- and maintenance and repair costs. j. A description and discussion of the CNG fueling facility built and utilized in this demonstration, including but not limited to, physical description of the facility, cost of construction and operation, maintenance and repair record of the facility, any safety issues and how they were dealt with, and a description of the current and projected utilization of the facility. k. Recommendations for the future use of the demonstrated dual-fuel technology in CONTRACTOR'S operations; manufacturer plans for commercialization; and any known plans for technology improvements. I. A set of 35 mm color slides documenting the demonstration, including installation of the engines into vehicles, vehicles in operation, vehicles fueling, emissions testing, and the fueling facility. 3. Two copies of the final report, incorporating the comments of DISTRICT, shall be submitted to DISTRICT'S Program Supervisor and one copy shall be submitted to DISTRICTS TA Staff Specialist assigned to contracts no later than March 31, 1999. 4. Each year for the life of this Contract, CONTRACTOR shall submit a two-page progress update on the funded project for distribution at DISTRICT'S annual CONTACTOR'S' Review Meeting, held at DISTRICT headquarters. At DISTRICTS discretion, CONTRACTOR shall make a 15-minute oral presentation about the project at said meeting. DISTRICT shall provide CONTRACTOR with sufficient advance notice on the exact dates, procedures, formatting, etc., for the written summary and oral report. 5 MILESTONES TASK Due Date AMOUNT Project Kickoff Meeting January 16, 1996 Execute Participant MOU (Task 1) March 1, 1996 $15,000 Vehicle Test Plan April 1, 1996 $20,000 Emissions Test Plan (Task 3) May 15, 1996 $20,000 Finish Fueling Facility Construction (Task 3) August 1, 1996 $50,000 Complete Engine Repowering (Task 2) November 1, 1996 $210,000 Fueling &Vehicle Training November 15, 1996 $12,662 Complete Year One Field Test November 15, 1997 $25,000 Chassis Emissions Testing January 31, 1996 $25,000 Vehicle Field Test (Task 4) December 1, 1998 $25,000 Draft Final Report February 15, 1999 $10,000 Final Emissions Report (Task 5) February 15, 1999 $10,000 Final Report April 1, 1999 $25,000 Total Project Amount $447,000 6 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 28, 1996 Agenda Item (11 )(b)(2)(b): OMTS95-o41b: Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding with South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) for a Heavy Duty Vehicle Demonstration Project in form approved by General Counsel. Summary As part of our contract with the SCAQMD and our proposal for the Heavy Duty Demonstration Project, we are required to execute a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with all of the parties involved in the project. Ed Hodges, Director of Maintenance will give a brief presentation on this item. Also, please see the attached staff report. Budaet Information Executing the MOU is one of the milestones that will allow the Districts to bill the SCAQMD and receive $15,000.00. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the OMTS Committee authorize staff to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding with the SCAQMD for a Heavy Duty Vehicle Demonstration Project, OMTS Committee Recommendation The OMTS Committee recommends that the Joint Boards authorize staff to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding with the SCAQMD for a Heavy Duty Vehicle Demonstration Project. J:%WPDOCIBSNG TEa 111 B2-B u January 23, 1996 STAFF REPORT OMTS95-041b: Consideration of motion authorizing staff to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding with the South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD) for a Heavy Duty Vehicle Demonstration Project. At the September OMTS Committee meeting, staff presented the proposal that was submitted to the SCAQMD for some of the AB 2766 funds. At the February OMTS Committee meeting, the Committee requested that the Joint Chairman sign the contract between the Districts and SCAQMD. Task 1 of that contract calls for the Districts to execute a participant Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) on or before March 1, 1996. The SCAQMD agreed to pay $15,000.00 for achieving this milestone. Attached for your guidance and information is a copy of the MOU that we have put together with all of the participants. Additionally, our General Counsel has given very valuable input to this process and agrees as to its form. BUDGET INFORMATION The attached MOU is one of the milestones called out in our contract with the SCAQMD. Executing this agreement will enable us to invoice the SCAQMD for $15,000.00. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the OMTS Committee authorize staff to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding with the SCAQMD for a Heavy Duty Vehicle Demonstration Project. EEH:cm R:%W PDOCV13101EH\OMRS19S941 B.SR CSDOC 0 P.O.Box$127 0 Fountain Valley,CA 9272E-4127 0 (714)e62a411 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING This MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ("MOU") is entered into as of this 26th day of Jaunuary, 1996, by and among the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County ("CSDOC"), Southern California Gas Company ("SoCalGas"), Pima Gro Systems, Inc. ("Pima Gro"), Power Systems Associates ("PSA"), Battelle ("Battelle") and South Coast Air Quality Management District("SCAQMD")(collectively, the "Parties"). RECITALS WHEREAS, CSDOC has submitted a proposal to SCAQMD for Alternative Fuels Heavy-Duty Truck Demonstration (RFP#9495-31) dated August 29, 1995 a copy of which is attached as Exhibit A hereto(the "Proposal"); WHEREAS, CSDOC contracts with Pima Gro for the transport of municipal biosolids by Pima Gro trucks from CSDOC's Fountain Valley treatment plant to destinations in Kern County, Imperial County and Yuma, Arizona; WHEREAS, Pima Gro is willing to make up to ten of Pima Gro's trucks (the "Fleet") available to participate in the use of the Caterpillar dual fuel 3I76B engine as described in the Proposal, subject, however, to the execution of an agreement between Pima Gro and CSDOC; WHEREAS, the Parties desire that a CNG refueling station be installed at CSDOC's Fountain Valley facility as described in the Proposal; WHEREAS, SoCalGas has extensive experience in installing and managing natural gas fueling stations; ": usucuss�saoua.m e NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY AGREE AS - FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. This MOU sets forth the responsibilities of each of the Parties with respect to the proposed demonstration of the Caterpillar 3176B dual fuel engine (the "Engine")in the Fleet, as more fully described in the Proposal (the "Project"). SECTION 2. Subject to the execution of a contract by the SCAQMD, CSDOC commits to develop a CNG refueling station (the "Station") at CSDOC's Fountain Valley facility. The Station shall be utilized by the Fleet to fuel vehicles to haul municipal biosolids to locations in Kem County and CSDOC shall also seek to expand the natural gas base load at the Station through its own vehicle use and use by nearby communities and private fleets. The Station shall be designed and constructed in a manner to ensure safe, reliable fuel delivery that meets required quality specifications, allows flexibility for future expansion and minimizes operating expenses. The basic components of the Station shall be as are set forth in Exhibit B hereto. SECTION 3. PSA shall: (a) Not later than December 31, 1996, complete emission optimization of the Engine and test the Engine on an engine dynamometer at BKM Engineering in San Diego, California, using the 13-mode steady-state test procedure for emissions. PSA shall also arrange for Engine certification testing at Southwest Research Institute, with a target Engine certification level of 2.5 glbhp-hr NO, O:\YSFu'\SJS\SJSIOISB.O]C -2 4 � (b) Install the Engine and design and install an onboard fuel storage and a-CPrb as delivery system in each truck of the Fleet commencing within sixty (60) days after the date of this MOU, and in accordance with the schedule set forth in Exhibit D hereto. Prior to the installation of the Engine and the design and installation of the onboard fuel storage and delivery system, PSA shall coordinate the design and the scheduling of installation with Pima Gro. As the repowering of each truck in the Fleet is completed, Pima Gro shall conduct acceptance tests on each truck to ensure that each truck operates safely and provides acceptable performance to the approval of Pima Gro, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. (c) At its cost and expense, arrange for the disposition of the diesel engines replaced by the Engines in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations and this MOU. (d) Use its reasonable best efforts to coordinate efforts to optimize the Engines to 2.5 g/bhp-hr NO.; (e) Arrange with the Engine manufacturer to provide spare parts inventory for the Engines; and (f) Identify, in consultation with Pima Gro and Battelle, a specific diesel truck(s) to be used as a control vehicle(s) during the term of the Project (the "Control Trucks"). The Control Trucks shall be configured as nearly identically as possible to the Fleet and shall be operated on a route(s)that is similar to those of the Fleet. J:\V560.2\SJS\SJa:Ol69.WC - J - a y SECTION 4. CSDOC shall: (a) Determine the site location at CSDOC's facility at Fountain Valley for the Station and, in consultation with Pima Gro, the public and private access to the Station, to achieve optimum benefits, (b) Develop, with the consultation assistance of SoCalGas, the Station. The design shall include, but not be limited to, all site specifications, fueling needs, and building and safety requirements, (c) Procure and install, or cause to be installed, all necessary equipment at the Station. SECTION 5. SoCalGas shall: (a) Develop the design documents for construction of the Station; (b) Develop all technical specifications for the components of the Station; (c) Provide CSDOC with all equipment specifications; (d) Provide construction management services for the related gas services (i.e., gas main and service, metering and billing); (e) Provide customized billing reports to monitor fuel consumption at the Station for individual vehicles and fleets; and (f) Provide formal and ongoing training related to safety, operation, maintenance and fueling of the Fleet. SECTION 6. In addition to the services SoCalGas shall provide as set forth in Section 5 above, SoCalGas shall also provide consulting services to CSDOC in connection with the permitting and construction of the Station. CSDOC shall compensate SoCalGas for its consulting services at the rate set forth in SoCalGas' proposal to CSDOC. CSDOC shall make payments to SoCalGas on a monthly basis as invoiced by SoCalGas for 0:\U$Z"kSJS\SJS101SB.WC 4 consulting services provided. Payments to SOCa1Ges shall be made not later than 30 days after the receipt of the applicable invoice by CSDOC. SECTION 7. Battelle shall: (a) Act as the project manager for and be responsible for the development of a field test plan, data collection, emission testing, and data analysis and dissemination, all in accordance with the Proposal and this MOU. (b) Develop a field test plan (the "FT Plan") in collaboration with Pima Gro, PSA and CSDOC. The FT Plan shall be submitted to SCAQMD for approval. The FT Plan shall provide an experimental design that leads to collection of data from which statistically significant findings can be made. The FT Plan shall include operations such as assigning routes for the Fleet and Control Trucks, fueling procedures and maintenance procedures. The FT Plan shall also include procedures for collecting data on parameters such as mileage accumulated, fuel consumption, driver and service personnel reactions, maintenance and time out of services; (c) Collect operations and maintenance data on each of the trucks of the Fleet and the Control Trucks. The data shall be such data as specified in the FT Plan; (d) Reduce collected data, validate such data and assemble a data base of results of the Project. (e) Develop an emission test plan (the "ET Plan") to provide emission tests for the Fleet and Control Trucks. The ET Plan shall include, but not be limited to, emission data available from the Engine manufacturer, anticipated testing schedules, test cycles and procedures to be used, and identification of testing locations; (1) Coordinate emission testing in accordance with the ET Plan; o:wnuv.rsswoia.vx - 5 - (g) Assemble a data base of the ET Plan test results; (h) Provide information on Project progress and results to interested agencies and organizations, including presentation of Project results at meetings and conferences, on-site press events and other activities; (i) Analyze all operation data to determine fuel economy, power, performance, maintenance costs and reliability, and compare the same for the Fleet and the Control Trucks; 6) Analyze emission data and compare emission levels from the Fleet to the Control Trucks and to applicable emission standards; SECTION 8. Battelle shall manage the Project to achieve the Projecfs objectives (the "Project Manager"). The Project Manager shall prepare a Project plan that sets forth a master schedule for the completion of each Parties, obligations hereunder. The Project Manager shall monitor the progress of each of the Parties against the master schedule and allocate resources, within the terms of this MOU, to accomplish the completion of the Project. The Project Manager shall prepare and submit to each of the Parties: (a) Monthly progress reports on the technical and economic status of the Project; (b) Quarterly progress reports summarizing and analyzing the Project results, achievement of milestones, preliminary findings and recommendations for completion of the Project; (c) A draft final report containing an executive summary and a detailed discussion of the technical and economic results and conclusions of the Project. The draft o:�ussuws�sss�mse.voc -6 - final report shall be submitted at least 60 days prior to submission of the final report referred to in(d)below; (d) A final report that addresses all comments received on the draft final report. The final report shall be submitted not later than April 1, 1999; and (e) A set of 35mm slides documenting the Project. The Project Manager shall make a presentation on the status of the Project at the annual "Technology Advancement(TA) Contractor Review Meeting." SECTION 9. The costs of implementing the Project and this MOU shall be paid by each of the Parties as provided in the Cost Schedule set forth in Section 7 of the Proposal and as modified herein. SECTION 10. (a) This MOU, including the rights and duties contained herein, shall not be assigned, in whole or in part, by any of the parties without the prior written consent of each of the other Parties. (b) This MOU is not intended to create or evidence any partnership, joint venture or similar relationship of any kind. (c) This MOU shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. (d) This MOU is binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the Parties hereto, their representatives, successors and permitted assigns. (e) This MOU may be signed in one or more counterparts, all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement. (f) This MOU may not be modified or amended except by a written agreement executed by each of the Parties. o:mzcu�smsw�"ue."oc - 7 - SECTION 11. The Parties understand and agree that funding for the Project is dependent on a grant of funds to CSDOC from SCAQMD in the amount of Four Hundred Forty-Seven Thousand Dollars ($447,000). Except as provided in Section 6, and unless otherwise agreed to, CSDOC's obligation to make payments to any of the Parties shall be conditioned upon receipt of said funds from SCAQMD and shall be limited to the following amounts: (a) PSA—$192,700 to cover the cost of one-half of the purchase of the new engines, plus$105,000 for installation and certification of the new engines. (b) Battelle—$99,962 to cover the cost of testing, reporting and acting as Project Manager. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY for itself and on behalf of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have duly executed this MOU as of the date first above written. o:wssssws�smoue.oc: - 8 - Approved as to Form: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF Thomas L. Woodruff ORANGE COUNTY for itself and on behalf of District Counsel County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California By By Title SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY By Title PIMA GRO SYSTEMS By Title POWER SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES By Title BATTELLE By Title SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT By Title b.V5Ei5`9J5\SJS:Ot58.ZC - 9 w JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 28, 1996 Agenda Item (11 )(b)(3): FAHR96-04 Consideration of Resolution No. 96-20, Amending Resolution No. 95-105, Extending Benefit Coverage For Regular Employees Working A Reduced Work Week Summary The Districts' current Employee Benefit Program is specifically limited to full-time employees by Resolution 95-105. That Resolution specifies in the Definitions Article that regular full-time employees are entitled to benefits as set forth in the resolution, and in Section 38 that "The Districts shall provide health insurance coverage ... for the benefit of regular full-time employees." A similar provision will be found in each of the Memoranda of Understanding with the various employee groups. Extending employee benefits on a prorated basis to employees who would like to work a reduced work week would enhance the Districts' organizational flexibility through job sharing, more accurately match workload requirements with work schedules, potentially reduce overtime costs and offer a greater measure of equity to employees who do not work a 40-hour week. The current budget has a total of thirteen part-time positions, including one Storeskeeper Assistant in Finance, seven Part-time Assistants in Technical Services, and five Part-time Construction Inspectors in Engineering. The Districts' Employee Benefit Program could be extended to part-time employees on a prorated basis. Budget Considerations The Districts currently pays 7.65% of the part-time employees' Social Security Tax. The annual incremental cost of prorating additional benefits for a part-time position is dependent upon the weekly hours worked. Based on the existing thirteen part-time staff, the following table portrays the estimated additional expense associated with extending the Employee Benefit Program. Depending on the hours worked the incremental costs to the Districts is between $35,000 and $52,000 annually. e 3D30 Hour 20-30 Hour Currently Paid by Work Week Work Week %Total Benefits DieBicts7 Social Securily Tax $21,700 $14.600 7.65% Yea Addidonal Benefit $52,000 $35,000 18.35% No Program Total Benefits $73,700 $49,600 26.00% No Net AddRional $52,000 ; $35,000. — ExpensetoDistricts Table-Benefit Expersas for E Mng Thirteen Parr-Time Personnel Recommendation Provide part-time employees with entitlement to employee benefits prorated on the basis of 75 percent if the employee works on average between 30 and 40 hours per week on average, and 50 percent if the employee works between 20 and 30 hours per week. Amend the provisions of Resolution 95-105 to allow the proration of benefits to part-time employees, and authorize Staff to amend MOU's, health plan Summary Plan Documents and other administrative policy and procedure manuals as necessary. FAHR Committee Recommendation to Joint Boards of Directors The FAHR Committee concurs with staffs recommendation. J9W PDOCrBSAC961FEB96111 B-3 January 29, 1996 SUPPLEMENTAL STAFF REPORT FAHR96-04: Consideration Of Resolution No. , Extending Benefit Coverage For Regular Employees Working A Reduced Work Week At the January 10, 1996, meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resource Committee, certain issues were raised and questions asked with regard to the staff report proposing to extend benefit coverage to regular employees who may work a reduced work week. Those issues include: 1. How the Orange County Retirement System relates to part-time employees. 2. How prevalent the use of part-time employees is in Orange County and elsewhere. 3. Potential problems associated with Job Sharing programs. DISCUSSION Retirement costs. The Districts currently employ thirteen individuals on a part-time basis. After July 1, 1991, all state and local government employees not covered by a retirement plan of their employer are covered by Social Security and Medicare. Since our part-time employees did not participate in OCERS at that time, they were required to pay the Social Security tax of 7.65 percent. The Districts is required to pay the same amount. As stipulated by law, the Districts must pay retirement or pension plan contributions for part-time personnel. Currently we pay 7.65% Social Security tax for part-time employees. This retirement "benefit" is currently less than the 9.89% rate paid by the Districts to OCERS for each full-time position. Thus, there is no additional cost attributed to retirement contributions for part-time employees. Indeed, as a result of the different retirement systems, there is a $6,400 annual cost avoidance (based on the existing staff of thirteen part-time positions). As the OCERS contribution fluctuates annually, this savings will vary in future years. CSDOC 6 P.O. Box 8127 0 Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 0 (714) 962.2411 FAHR96-04 Page 2 January 29, 1996 Part-time employment survey. In a survey of 34 agencies in Orange County, thirteen (38 percent) were found to offer benefits to part-time workers (see Attachment 1). A Hewitt Associates survey of 505 private sector employers found that nearly 75 percent offered medical benefits, sick leave, vacation and holidays on a prorate basis to employees working 30 hours or more per week. The primary reason cited for offering part-time employment was because such work is "necessary to meet business needs". Other reasons given include: a means to adjust for changing workloads; and a tool to retain valuable employees. Job Sharing. Job sharing is a form of regular part-time employment in which two employees voluntarily share the duties and responsibilities of a single full-time position. Job sharing can reduce overtime costs, improve attendance levels, enable employees to fulfill family obligations more easily and encourage the retention of experienced support staff employees. Job sharers can frequently be used to fill in for absent workers, avoiding the additional cost of temporary help. As with any part-time position, job sharing holds the potential for misunderstanding if the individuals involved are not clear on the particular circumstances of their employment relationship. For that reason, we currently require part-time employees to enter into a Part-Time Employment Agreement (see Attachment 2) specifying their contractual relationship with the Districts. This agreement would be modified to include a prorated benefit schedule, and would be entered into by all part-time employees. The Operations Department is currently evaluating the potential for overtime cost reductions that might be achieved through a Plant Operator Apprenticeship Program. Participants in the program as envisioned would work part-time and receive training while pursuing a formal course of study at an accredited school. Once sufficiently trained, these individuals could augment full-time staff levels at approximately half the hourly rate of a Plant Operator. These positions would also allow present staff a greater flexibility to participate in cross training programs without necessarily incurring overtime costs. Individuals graduating from the Apprenticeship Program would be required to compete for full-time positions only when such positions became available. The findings of this evaluation will be reported in detail at a later date. GH:ps g N pNh lftteevesV hrop en 96 Attachment 1 ° Survey of Orange County Cities/Agencies with Benefits for Part-Time Workers January 18, 1996 City/Agency Benefits for PT Workers Anaheim No Brea Yes Buena Park Yes Costa Mesa No (only minimal leave benefits) County Yes Cypress Yes Dana Point Yes (no medical) Fountain Valley No Fullerton Yes Garden Grove No Huntington Beach Yes Irvine No La Habra No La Palma No Laguna Beach No Laguna Hills No Laguna Niguel No Lake Forest No Los Alamitos No Mission Viejo Yes Newport Beach No (only PERS contrb) O.C. Fire Yes Orange Yes Placentia No S.J. Capistrano No (Except 3 special cases) San Clemente Yes (no medical) Santa Ana No Seal Beach No Stanton No (only leave benefits) OCTA Yes Tustin No (only deferred comp) Villa Park No Westminister No Yorba Linda Yes (no medical) Attachment 2 PART-TIME EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 0 This Agreement of Part-time Employment in the classification of is entered into between the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California (hereinafter "Districts") , and - , (hereinafter "employee") to be effective on Employee recognizes and understands that their regular work week may be less than 40 hours. Employee's Duties. The employee will perform the duties and responsibilities as are set forth on the Class Specification for the job classification referenced above. Employee' s performance of these duties shall at all times be accomplished in a manner satisfactory to Districts' management . Compensation. Employee is entitled to compensation for services rendered under this agreement at the hourly rate established by the Districts' Boards for the above referenced job classification. Benefits. Employee is not entitled to receive benefits of employment provided to regular, full-time Districts employees, including, but not limited to, health coverage, life and disability insurance, paid leaves and retirement plan. Employee will be covered under benefits required by law, such as Workers' Compensation, and will contribute required contributions to the Federal Insurance Contributions Act . Termination of Employment. This Agreement may be terminated by either Districts or employee at any time without cause by providing two weeks written notice . This Agreement may be terminated by the Districts for cause at any time in the event the employee fails to perform their duties and responsibilities in a manner satisfactory to Districts' Management . In Witness Whereof, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the day and year written below. "DISTRICTS" "EMPLOYEE" Name Date Name Date GEE 1/95 9 RESOLUTION NO. 96-20 AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 95-105 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION RESOLUTION NO. 95-105 BY EXTENDING BENEFIT COVERAGE TO REGULAR EMPLOYEES WORKING A REDUCED WORKWEEK. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: 1. Section 1. Amend Article I, "Definitions", to provide part-time employees with the benefits set forth in Section 19, 'Vacations", Section 20, "Sick Leave", Section 23, "Personal Leave", Section 37, "Holidays", Section 39, "Insurance", and Section 60, "Severance Pay, on a prorated basis as follows: Hours of work per week Percent Benefit Subsidy 0 - under 20 None 20 - under 30 50 percent 30 - 40 75 percent PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 28, 1996. J:\WPDOCMIRES1 ES96 20 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 28, 1996 Agenda Item (11)(b)(4): FAHR96-10 Consideration of motion approving renewal of Boiler& Machinery Insurance for a one-year period effective March 1, 1996 to March 1, 1997, with American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance (Kemper Insurance Group), in an amount not to exceed $79,698. Summary This agenda item relates to the annual renewal of Boiler& Machinery insurance coverage for the Districts for the period March 1, 1996 through March 1, 1997. During the renewal process last year, the Districts' Broker of Record, Robert F. Driver Company, submitted the Districts' Boiler& Machinery insurance requirements to six (6) insurance carriers. Three (3) proposals were received. Upon the Committee's review of the proposals and recommendation, the Joint Boards of Directors approved placement of Boiler& Machinery insurance coverage with American - Manufacturers Mutual Insurance (Kemper Insurance Group) for the period March 1, 1995 through March 1, 1996. Kemper's overall superior policy terms, their knowledge of the Districts' facilities and programs, and the fact that theirs was the lowest cost proposal, were cited as factors in the recommendation to select Kemper. Robert F. Driver Company has surveyed the current Boiler& Machinery insurance market, and has reported (see attached letter)that only the three (3) carriers that submitted proposals last year still offer coverage for operations as large as the Districts. Given todays restrictive insurance market and the fact that Kemper will renew coverage for the Districts'with only a premium adjustment ($2,307) to allow for the increase in the Districts' property values, the Districts' Broker recommends Boiler& Machinery insurance renewal with Kemper. Staff concurs. Sufficient funds are contained in the current budget to cover the premium costs ($79,698). Staff Recommendation Renew Boiler& Machinery Insurance for the Districts for the period March 1, 1996 to March 1, 1997, with American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance (Kemper Insurance Group), in an amount not to exceed $79,698. FAHR Committee Recommendation to Joint Boards of Directors The FAHR Committee concurs with the recommendation of staff. J:%WPD0C0SAG96WEB% iB4 / (� ROBERT F. DRIVER ASSOCIATES comPLE(EINSURANCEIBONDSERvice - _CIATES a Dirision of&Am F.Dd yr Co..Inc. ASSO January 25, 1996 Mr. Steve Kozak County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 RE: Boiler and Machinery Insurance Renewal Dear Steve: As we discussed, the Boiler and Machinery insurance marketplace has not changed very much since last renewal. The limited number of available underwriters still providing Boiler and Machinery coverage are imposing high deductibles and premiums for large underwritings, such as County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. As you may recall from last year, Reliance National quoted premiums considerably higher than the incumbent Kemper, while Hartford Steam Boiler provided a quotation that was slightly higher than Kempees. We have surveyed the market, and have found that, today, these three canters are the only ones able to insure and service complex co-generation facilities such as those owned by the Districts. Based on the similar marketplace and unchanged underwriting positions of the other markets, we recommend that County Sanitation Districts of Orange County remain with Kemper Insurance Group for the renewal effective March 1, 1996. The current premium is $77,377, including state mandated CIGA fees. The renewal premium, including CIGA fees, is $79,698 allowing for a premium increase based on trended values. Sincerely, ROGER I�VE''R�SSOCI�S DiYnaJ. IGehl /J ((////11,'�e�n� Assistant Vice ent DJKlmsy dAdA BIRCH.STREET..SUITF-230,AIMPORT BCACH.CALIFORNIA 92AM1.26I0 014, 7.SA.0271 • FA.w 171J175AQ711 x�wuwaxvcsoonew.mnoc v JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 28, 1996 Agenda Item (11 )(b)(5): FAHR96-14 Consideration of motion to receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of December 1995. Summary Both Pacific Investment Management Co., PIMCO, and Mellon Trust began their professional external management of our funds in September 1995. In order to give the Directors an opportunity to review the month-end reports available from PIMCO, and to avoid distribution at the meeting, reports from the prior month are included with the agenda. Quarterly presentations are made to the Committee by both PIMCO and our third- party independent consultant, Callan Associates. The Investment Policy adopted by the Joint Boards on May 24, 1995, includes reporting requirements as listed down the PIMCO Monthly Report for the "Liquid Operating Monies" and for the "Long-Tenn Operating Monies." All of the Investment Policy requirements are being complied with and performance to date exceeds the index rates. Balances CSDOC Dec.31, 1995 State of Calf.WF $16,843,353 Bank of America 351,082 PIMCO-Short-term Portfolio 60,559,387 PIMCO-Long-term Portfolio 256,129.758 District 11 GO Bond Fund 16,715 Debt Service Reserves @ Trustees 33.904.754 $367.805.049 Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the Committee receive, approve and forward this report to the Joint Boards. FAHR Committee Recommendation to Joint Boards of Directors The Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee recommends this report be approved and fled. J9WPDOGBSWG96TEBWl 1 B-5 February 26, 1996 CSDOC TOTAL CASH & INVESTMENTS 1994 - 1995 s szm sro sa o..s osr ear raze u..z+ nrm u.r e� +..w �hn wa-ei eepe eo oa.w ua.eo o-.ei MONTHLY REPORT COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM P[MCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ending December 31, 1995) Liquid Operating Monies 14.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value: $61,121,663 Historical Cost: $61.131,613 14.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: :14 Of Index: .25 14.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact (gain/loss) of 1% Change: $85,570 (.14%) U.L4 REVERSE REPOS % of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: (see attached schedule) 0% 14.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY % of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 88% 14.L6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: AA .14.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING % of Portfolio Below 'A': 0% 14.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE 'In Compliance" 14.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Portfolio Total Rate of Return: I Month: .50 3 Months: 1.50 12 Months: ----- Year-lo-Date: ------ Index Total Rate of Return: t Month: .46 r:IsuAorlrgxw,vlumoWom60r.I lY5 MON'TOLY REPORT COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month eroding December 31, 1995) Long Tenn Operating dtorlies 14.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Curtnnt Market Value: $264,147.577 _ Historical Cost: $260,440,714 14.1.2 MODnrIrD DURATION Of Portfolio 2.7 Of Index: 2.4 14.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact (gainlloss) of I% Change $7,131,985 (2.6%) 14.1.4 REVERSE REPOS % of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: (see attached scllcdule) 0% 14.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY % of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: NA 14.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: AA 14.1.7 . SECL71179ES BELOW "A" RATING % of Portfolio Below "A": 0% 14.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" 14.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Portfolio Total Rate of Return: 1 Month: 1.13 3 Mundts: 3.39 12 Months: ------ Year-to-Date: --- Index Total Rate of Return: 1 Month: .90 r, dwbp',rwerWrmoLan,? J.I1J5 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 28, 1996 Agenda Item 1 1 )(b)(6): FAHR 96-15, Consideration of motion to receive and file the Mid-Year Finanical &Operational Report for the period ending December 31, 1995. Attached Mdin a separately bound document is the Districts'first comprehensive Mid-Year Report for the period ending December 31, 1995. This report is a consolidation of the of both the financial and operational accomplishments of the Districts'at the mid-point of the 1995-96 fiscal year. Contained within the Mid-Year Financial Report are budget summary reviews of the Joint Operating& Working Capital Funds, the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund, individual Districts,and the self-insurance funds. Contained within the Mid-Year Operational Report is the status of the Activity Trends and Projects previously identified in the 1995-96 Approved Budget. As indicated within the Overview Section of this report, 44.25 percent or$24,060,000 of the 1995-96 net joint operating budget of$54,380,000 has been expended. In addition, the Districts'are still only at 48.26 percent of the"target'budget of$49,860,000. The cost per million gallons for the second quarter alone was$603.09,which is slightly higher than the annual targeted amount of$599.00, but below the approved budget of$627.30. However, the cost per million gallons for the first half of the year is still low at $565.87 due to the unusually low first quarter total of only$508.98, Some of the factors contributing to the Increase of$94.11 cost per mg from the second quarter's total of $603.09 over the first quarter's total of$509.98 include: • Environmental Monitoring increased 257.27 percent,or$34.74 cast per mg over the first quarter. This majority of this increase is primarily attributable to the timing of payments made for ocean monitoring since out of the$1.3 million costs Incurred to date, only $268,000 was recognized in the first quarter. Although total environmental monitoring costs are$78,000 less than last year at this time,this line item is currently at 55.51 percent of the total budget and will have to be carefully monitored over the remainder of the year. • Although Repair Materials increased 67,91 percent, or$20.22 cost per mg over the first quarter, this line item is still at 49.63 percent of budget at mid-year. Staff will be challenged to keep this line item within the total$3,375,900 budget since an additional$500,000 of material relating to plant automation computer maintenance has now been identified that had not previously been considered during the preparation of the budget. • Research increased 580.65 percent,or$13.59 cost per mg over the first quarter. The majority of this increase is related to the increase in payments made to Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Authority(SCCWRPA). Although, the Research line item is currently at 69.28 percent of total budget, staff believes that the costs booked-to-date reflect a greater portion of the total annual cost and that the year end total cost will approximate the budget of$565,000. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the review,approve and file the 1995-96 Mid-Year Report. C IMDATAVTHDWIDYR AG JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 28, 1996 Agenda Item (11)(b)(7): FAHR 96-17: Consideration of motion to approve the 1996-97 Budget Assumptions for use in preparation of Districts' 1996-97 Budget Summary Certain assumptions are necessary as a foundation for developing the Districts' budget. These assumptions guide the Board of Directors and Districts' staff in determining the level of wastewater treatment services that will be provided to the community and how these services will be funded. Attached are key assumptions staff has developed in order to guide the Districts' through the development of the 1996-97 budget. Staff encourages Directors' to - propose additional assumptions that they believe should be used in the budget development process or to propose any other changes they would like to see incorporated in the 1996-97 budget. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Joint Boards review the attached Budget Assumptions and approve their use in the preparation of the 1996-97 budget. CIMDATAp BMUW SUMAG 1996-97 Proposed Budget Assumptions • Inflation for Orange County in 1996-97 is projected to be 2.5 percent based on the percentage of change in the consumer price index obtained from the December 1995 Economic and Business Review report prepared by Chapman University. • Connection fees, or capital facilities connection charges, and annexation fees will increase by the Engineering News Record index for Los Angeles in accordance with the adopted Board Resolution. However, user fees will remain at the same rates for the fifth consecutive year. • Property tax revenues are projected to remain constant as the increases from new development are expected to be offset by a general decline in overall property valuation. • After discussions with the Districts' Investment Manager, PIMCO, earnings on the investment of the Districts idle operating cash and reserves will be budgeted at six percent. • Staffing levels will remain the same or will be lower than the levels approved in the 1995-96 budget. There will be no new net positions added. In addition, salaries will remain at prudent levels as memorandum of understanding agreements are due to expire in November 1996. Step increases will be budgeted for all non-exempt employees not currently at the top of their range. • The proposed joint operating budget will continue to reflect an improvement in safety, technical, and management training as the Districts moves towards national standards in the percentage of training costs to total salaries. In 1996-97, the Districts will emphasize cross-training for operational and maintenance employees in order to achieve multi-tasking positions within the organization and reduce the total number of employees needed to operate the treatment facilities. • All programs and activities will be re-evaluated to determine their contribution towards the Districts' mission with the intent to eliminate those programs and activities that do not. • The capital improvement program will continue forward with only the completion of the most critical projects until the Strategic Plan update is completed. With the goal of completing at least 80 percent of the total capital improvement program budget within a 12 month period, staff is estimating that the total 1996-97 Capital Improvement Program will fall within a range of$25 million to $50 million. C'%W DATAUTBDSUDASS.MM JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 28, 1996 Agenda Item (12): Consideration of motion to authorize staff to place a moratorium on the determination and collection of excess capacity charges until such time that a study for capital charges is completed and a method to collect capital charges is adopted by the Boards of Directors, and to guarantee the capital charge for industrial users which connect to the system or increase their discharge prior to completion of the study will be no higher than those specified in the staff report dated February 22, 1996. The moratorium will not apply to dischargers which enter into separate discharge agreements with the Districts. Summary The excess capacity charge(ECC)initially adopted in July 1983,was intended to be applied on new developments that connect to the sewer, or existing developments that expand operations and require substantial sewerage facilities capacity. The ECC would be determined by the Boards of Directors on a case-by-case basis. On May 24, 1995,the Boards of Directors adopted an ordinance,effective July 1, 1995,establishing a method to calculate the ECC,including a requirement that existing businesses pay an additional capital charge when their discharge increased by 25%. After the ECC calculation method was adopted by the Boards of Directors it was met with considerable opposition from businesses because of the cost associated with its implementation. Because of a lack of adequate community outreach,the staff recommended and the Boards of Directors concurred that the method of determining the ECC be repealed pending reanalysis and community Input. This was accomplished on November 15, 1995,and the Districts returned to the former practice of assessing charges on a case-by-case basis. There are new businesses considering starting up in Orange County and existing businesses presently planning to substantially expand their process operations and increase their discharge volumes. Staff believes that establishing a standard method for determining an ECC will provide useful guidance to those dischargers who are subject to the charge. A project to study capital charges and make a recommendation for connection fees and ECCs will begin approximately March 1996,and it is anticipated to be completed by early 1997. In order to accommodate industries'budgeting and planning needs,it is necessary to establish criteria which can be used by industry in determining what their future capital charge may be. The staff report explains the criteria for various groups of industrial users. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the Boards of Directors approve the request to allow staff to place a temporary moratorium for ECCs for industrial users now making applications for new wastewater discharge permits until the capital charge study is completed and a method to tolled capital charges is adopted. All dischargers applying for permits during the moratorium would be informed that capital charges vdH be assessed in the future with a guarantee to industry the capital charge to certain industrial users will conform to those specified in the staff report dated February 22, 1996. J:WNSB URIaDMS MAT.BRD Febwry Y3,1808 a 10:]Oa.m. tar: ' a February 22, 1996 STAFF REPORT Agenda Item (12) - Consideration of motion to authorize staff to place a moratorium on the determination and collection of excess capacity charges until such time that a study for capital charges is completed and a method to collect capital charges is adopted by the Boards of Directors and to guarantee the capital charge for industrial users which connect to the system or increase their discharge prior to completion of the study will be no higher than those specified in the staff report dated February 22, 1996. The moratorium will not apply to discharges which enter into separate discharge agreements with the Districts. BACKGROUND The excess capacity charge (ECC) was initially adopted and became effective on July 1, 1983. The charge is applied to new developments connecting to the sewer, or existing developments that expand operations and require substantial sewerage facilities capacity. It was intended to provide the Districts the ability to collect revenue for construction of capital projects to accommodate the increased flow. The amount of the charge would be in an amount to be determined by the Boards of Directors on a case-by-case basis. The ECC wording is contained in Section 309 of the Wastewater Discharge Regulations dated February 7, 1992, and was unchanged until May 24, 1995, when the Boards of Directors adopted an ordinance, effective July 1, 1995, establishing a specific method to calculate the ECC which was applicable to any new connection or new user whose discharge was tributary to the Districts' sewerage system and whose average daily loading exceeded certain parameters. The purpose of the ECC was to implement a standard method for determining the ECC, including a requirement that existing businesses pay an additional capital charge when their discharge increased by 25% or more. The ECC method adopted in May 1995 met with considerable opposition from the business community because of the cost associated with implementation. The staff recommended and the Boards of Directors concurred that the new method of determining the ECC be repealed. This was accomplished on November 15, 1995 and the Districts returned to the former practice of assessing charges for high-volume dischargers on a case-by-case basis by reenacting former ordinance Section 309. The most recent issue to be raised deals with existing businesses which substantially expand their process operations and therefore increase their discharge volumes. Staff raesurv22,1wB.1¢wa.m. ew CSDOC 0 A Bow W7 . AD+nlain Wfle,CA 92728.8127 0 (714)962O411 AGENDA ITEM (13) Page 2 Z February 22, 1996 - believes that establishing a standard method for determining an ECC will provide useful guidance to those dischargers who are subject to this charge. ISSUES RAISED SINCE REPEAL OF METHOD TO DETERMINE ECC There are at least two companies that are presently considering expansion plans that would increase their discharges by more than 100,000 gallons per day. Each of these expansion plans will require substantial sewerage facilities capacity and, therefore, is subject to Section 309. A project to study capital charges and make a recommendation for connection fees and ECC will begin approximately March 1996, and it is anticipated to be completed by early 1997. In order to treat all businesses fairly, staff believes that it is advisable to wait until the study is complete before collecting additional ECCs. GUARANTEE TO INDUSTRY REGARDING FUTURE CAPITAL CHARGES Many industries in Orange County, or those desiring to locate in Orange County have inquired about the Districts' future collection of capital charges. This is important information for companies because they use the data to make budgeting projections and decisions affecting plant operations. Due to the importance that capital charges have on industry, the Districts wish to institute the following guarantees to industry: 1. When the new capital charge program becomes effective, a new capital charge shall be applied to industrial users initiating discharge to the Districts between July 1, 1995 and prior to adoption of the new capital charge program (estimated 1997), which discharge: 1) average daily flow equal to or greater than 50,000 gallons, or 2) average daily Suspended Solids (SS) equal to or greater than 105 Ibs, or 3) average daily Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) equal to or greater than 105 lbs. However, the annual ECC payment under the new capital charge method shall not be greater than the annual payment would have been using the ECC method (including interest) repealed November 15, 1995, for the same quantity of flow, BOD, and SS for which the ECC charge would have been calculated and paid over ten years. 2. When the new capital charge program becomes effective, a new capital charge shall be applied to industrial users permitted by the Districts prior to July 1, 1995, which discharged for fiscal year 1994-95: 1) average daily flow equal to or greater than 50,000 gallons, or 2) average daily SS equal to or greater than 105 Ibs, or 3) average daily BOD equal to or greater than 105 Ibs, and who increased raa qV..1M a 10:30a.m. i.« AGENDA ITEM (13) y Page 3 February 22, 1996 their average daily flow, BOD, or SS after July 1, 1995. The new capital charge shall be for the difference in flow and loadings compared to fiscal year 1994-95. However, the annual ECC payment under the new capital charge method shall not be greater than the annual payment would have been using the ECC method (including interest) repealed November 15, 1995, for the same quantity of flow, BOD, and SS for which the ECC charge would have been calculated and paid over ten years. 3. If the industrial users subject to items 1 and 2 above choose to switch from the method of calculation shown above to the new capital charge method within the first year of adoption, then the new charge method will thereafter be used in calculating all the capital charges for the industrial user. 4. The issue of charges to existing dischargers which have not increased their average daily flow, BOD, or SS after July 1, 1995, or are not subject to items 1 or 2 above, will be addressed as part of the cost allocation review in the new strategic plan. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Boards of Directors approve the request to allow staff to place a temporary lectiou moratorium for ECCs for industrial users industries now making applications for new wastewater discharge permits until the capital charge study is completed and a method to collect capital charges is adopted. All dischargers applying for permits would be informed that capital charges wW be assessed in the future with a guarantee to industry as described in this staff report. J W:Ivw JAWPVW%AURVOWSWORAT.BRD i.u.nu+we.ro�a.m. N„ v b �(13 S OF DIRECTORS R MEETING RY 28, 199E Age "9: Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Report dated February 6, 1996 re the Joint Agreement of the County of Orange, the Official Investment Pool Participants' Committee and Each Option A Pool Participant; and consideration of Resolution No. 96-21 approving said Agreement. Summary On the afternoon of January 3, 1996, the Orange County Investment Pool (OCIP) Committee reached final agreement with the County on all of the details of the"Joint Agreement of the County of Orange, the Official Investment Pool Participants' Committee and Each Option A Pool Participant"for the resolution of claims against the County of Orange dated December 18, 1995. The Joint Agreement has been conveyed to all Option A participants (the 190 schools, cities, special districts and other public entities that signed the Option A version of the Comprehensive Settlement Agreement that was approved in May 1995)for their individual consideration and approval. The attached staff report outlines the major features of the Joint Agreement. Copies of the conveyance letter from Pillsbury Madison 8 Sutro and the executive summary of the Joint Agreement are attached. On January 10, the Joint Agreement was held over for consideration by the FAHR Committee to February 14 to allow time to receive the County disclosure statement filed January 19 in federal Bankruptcy Court. To obtain a copy of the entire Joint Agreement, call Cortina Chaudhry at (714) 962-2411, extension 2003. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee receive and file the staff report, and recommend approval of the Joint Agreement to the Executive Committee. FAHR Committee Recommendation The FAHR Committee recommends that the Executive Committee receive and file the staff report, and recommends approval of the Joint Agreement to the Joint Boards. Executive Committee Recommendation The Executive Committee concurs with the FAHR recommendation. ��wwocietivaeevmee�u e n February 5, 1996 STAFF REPORT FAHR96-09: Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Report dated February 5, 1996 re the Joint Agreement of the County of Orange, the Official Investment Pool Participants' Committee and Each Option A Pool Participant; and consideration of resolution approving said Agreement. The OCIP Committee has approved the "Joint Agreement of the County of Orange, the Official Investment Pool Participants' Committee and Each Option A Pool Participant." This has been a very lengthy process. Meetings were held throughout the summer to develop a platform which would be the basis for paying off all of the County's vendors, bond holders and non-governmental creditors. These meetings resulted in the OCIP Committee first approving the Joint Agreement on September 7. The September version of the Joint Agreement formed the basis of the legislation which was approved by the legislature and signed into law by Governor Wilson in late-September. The Joint Agreement moves revenues of certain County agencies and the OCTA into accounts that will be used for paying off new borrowings which will be used to pay off the various creditors mentioned above, and improves the order in which Option A participants receive litigation proceeds from the lawsuits against Merrill Lynch and others. It also removes all future recourse against the County by the Option A participants who sign the Joint Agreement. The September legislation did not check with all of the details of the Joint Agreement. Naturally, the OCIP Committee insisted that the Joint Agreement be amended to coincide with the state laws that had been passed to support it and was also concerned that the errata of the September Joint Agreement be corrected. Unfortunately, bankruptcy counsel for the County did not agree with the concerns of the OCIP Committee and he delayed any substantive and constructive action necessary to amend the Joint Agreement and resolve the impasse. When Judge Ryan originally directed the County to amend its complaint against Merrill Lynch because the County had not adequately demonstrated that it even had proper standing to sue Merrill Lynch regarding the commingled investment pool, the Joint Agreement became valueless because the ability of the Option A participants to receive any litigation proceeds from the County's efforts was suddenly thrown into serious question. The OCIP Committee had no reason to continue to press for amending a Joint Agreement whose very basis was in such peril. Fortunately, on December 1, 1995 Judge Ryan ruled that the County's amended pleading was sufficient and that the County could proceed with the suit against Merrill Lynch. Interest in amending the Joint Agreement was renewed by both the County and CSDOC 0 P.O.Box 0127 6 Fountain Valle,CA 92726-6127 • (7td)962-2411 Staff Report _ Page 2 February 5, 1996 the OCIP Committee and, as a result of intense efforts by the attorneys and financial professionals working for the OCIP Committee and the County, the December 18 amended Joint Agreement was approved in principle with the assumption that the pending side letters between the County and the Cities Subcommittee and between the County and the TCA would be subsequently approved by all relevant parties. The side letters have been approved, and after a flurry of letters between the attorneys, the Joint Agreement was approved for distribution on January 3 and has been conveyed to the Option A participants for their consideration and approval. Price Waterhouse is handling the distribution and will be receiving the approval/disapproval results from each of the approximately 190 councils and boards that must decide on the Joint Agreement. Im�act on the Sanitation Districts The Joint Agreement is favorable to the interests of the Sanitation Districts. Under the Comprehensive Settlement Agreement of May 1995, the Option A participants (which includes the Sanitation Districts) were entitled to share in the first layer of the litigation proceeds 2:1 with the County. Under the Joint Agreement, the County is now in the third layer of litigation receipts. Schools will receive the first $55 million in litigation proceeds, the non-school Option A participants will receive the second layer of proceeds up to $325 million, and the County will receive the third layer of proceeds up to $176 million. Layers four through seven are a combination of splits between the Option A participants, the OCTA, and the County. OCTA's share will be a payback for the $15 million per year it loses under the Joint Agreement. In exchange for this improvement in the Option A's position in the litigation "receiving line", the OCIP participants give up any further recourse against the County other than the litigation proceeds. However, assuming that the secured and unsecured claims that were fully allowed by the County under the terms of the CSA are, in fact, of limited value because of the County's dire financial position, giving them up in favor of an improved litigation position is prudent. It can be argued that only the litigation proceeds will provide any further payback to the Sanitation Districts and the other Option A participants. Today we have received approximately 80% of our original deposits that were held by the County. Assuming that the litigation (or settlement) with Merrill Lynch and the others goes reasonably well, we may approach 90% of our original deposits. There is more good news. The Joint Agreement and its supporting letter from the County's bankruptcy counsel provides that the withheld proceeds now being held by the County will be released. The amount due to the Sanitation Districts will be listed in the final Price Waterhouse documents which Sanitation Districts' staff does not have at the time of this writing. We will report on this amount at the meeting. Staff Report Page 3 February 5, 1996 Most importantly, the Joint Agreement will provide the necessary funds for the County to repay all of its non-government creditors. This is done by a net $15 million per year reallocation of OCTA revenues to the County, and a total of$12 million per year($4 million each) from Harbors, Beaches and Parks, Flood Control, and the Orange County Development Agency. For the Sanitation Districts, this is a very favorable part of the agreement. The repayment of all outstanding bonds by the County will remove the cloud of default once and for all from the name "Orange County." The Joint Agreement also provides that the County will use Thomas Hayes to oversee the disbursement of revenues under the Joint Agreement. It also provides that the County will not seek or support any diversion of revenue from any signing Option A Pool Participant for the purpose of financing the repayment of claims in the County's Plan of Adjustment. This particular provision is important because, as you may recall, the County had advocated that the property tax revenues of the Sanitation Districts be reallocated to the County for just that purpose. The last document for completing the workout of the bankruptcy is the County's Plan of Adjustment which was filed in December. The associated Disclosure Statement was fled January 19, 1996. It is, in essence, the "business plan" of the Plan of Adjustment and provides the specific details on how the County will meet its obligations under the Plan of Adjustment. The Disclosure Statement is approximately 350 pages long. It classifies all claims against the County and discloses how each will be treated. It also describes and assigns the assets and revenues the County intends to use to pay the claims. The Plan of Adjustment, Disclosure Statement and Joint Agreement are consistent with one another with respect to the treatment of the Sanitation Districts. All three propose that our position for receiving proceeds from the litigation against Merrill Lynch and others is improved in exchange for our agreeing to take no further recourse against the County for the secured and non-secured claims fully-allowed under the Comprehensive Settlement Agreement (CSA). The Joint Boards approved it April of last year and it was approved by federal Bankruptcy Court Judge Ryan in May. These claims amount to 20% or approximately $93 million of our original investments in the OCIP. Litigation against Merrill Lynch and others is, of course, the issue of most interest to all of us. The proceeds from this litigation is the largest and (arguably) the most likely source of additional funds for repaying the losses suffered by the cities, schools and special districts that had invested in the OCIP. Pat Shea provided a January 22 update on the bankruptcy (attached). ti Staff Report Page 4 February 5, 1996 On February 16, Judge Ryan will re-hear the County's motion to simplify the case against Merrill Lynch by bifurcating the causes of action into two portions. He will also hear the County's motion to strike Merrill Lynch's estoppel defense which asserts that since the County knew full well that its investment practices were illegal, then the County can't turn to Merrill Lynch. The County, on the other hand, under the theory of ultra vires, claims that because Merrill Lynch knew or should have known that it was supporting illegal investment practices as the vendor, it must return all of the original investments back to the citizens of Orange County. The citizens are the ones who are ultimately protected from the illegal activities of the vendor, irrespective of the actions of the County Treasurer. February 16 may well be a defining moment for the ease and timeliness of resolving the County's case against Merrill Lynch. If Judge Ryan agrees to the County's motion to strike Merrill Lynch's estoppel defense and if he agrees to the County's motion to simplify the case by bifurcating so that only ultra vires is tried first, then the case moves quickly without extensive discovery. Merrill Lynch may be more likely to settle and to settle early. In any event, the case against Merrill Lynch will move forward and will remain the only discernable source of significant source of funds for paying back our lost investments. Staff will provide additional details at the meeting of the FAHR and Executive Committees. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the FAHR and Executive Committees receive and file the staff report dated February 5, 1996, and recommend approval of the agreement to the Joint Boards of Directors. BPA:cmc J\WPNC\CM NMRS AHRB S C . Lww OIIiC E3 Of PILLSBURY MADISON 6 SUTRO LLP L09 ANGELES SUITE IBOO wEN LO VAR. NEw YOPR ORANGE TY COUN SAC PAMENTO 101 WEST BROADWAY A. O.GO WA. R.TOKro SAN DIEGO. CALIFORNIA 92101-8201 „AN �osE sN INroN. oc orvc EONG TO[TO TELEPNONE I9191 8JA-S O00 GACJIMILE (3191 YJfi-1995 WRITERS Of F10E AND DIRECT DIAL NVN9En (619) 544-3177 December 27, 1995 TO: ORANGE COUNTY INVESTMENT POOL PARTICIPANTS ' DISTRIBUTION LIST Re: In re County of Orange, Case No. SA94-22272-JR "JOINT AGREEMENT" PROPOSED BY THE COUNTY OF ORANGE FOR THE RESOLUTION OF POOL-RELATED CLAIMS OF OPTION A POOL PARTICIPANTS, AND OTHER RELATED MATTERS Dear Pool Participant: Enclosed herewith you will find an execution copy of an agreement entitled JOINT AGREEMENT OF THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, THE OFFICIAL INVESTMENT POOL PARTICIPANTS' COMMITTEE AND EACH OPTION A POOL PARTICIPANT FOR RESOLUTION OF CLAIMS AGAINST THE COUNTY OF ORANGE ( "Joint Agreement") along with an Executive Summary relating to that agreement. This proposed Joint Agreement by the County is intended to address the treatment of the remaining claims of Option A Pool Participants allowed under the Comprehensive Settlement Agreement ( "CSA" ) , and to address certain other specific matters related to the interests of Pool Participants. While the Joint Agreement is not a Plan of Adjustment, if executed by your government entity, it will have material impact on your right to participate in the Plan of Adjustment process, and will, to a large extent, define your entitlements under the Plan of Adjustment. This is obviously a very important document. It is technically drafted and requires your attention, along with the specific advice of your own financial and legal professionals. As with the Comprehensive Settlement Agreement, the financial and legal professionals of the OCIP Committee are unable to act as advisors to you on an individual basis . Rather, the financial and legal advisors to the OCIP Committee have prepared the Executive Summary which accompanies 20946332 December 27, 1995 Page 2 this letter to assist you in understanding the Joint Agreement. The impact of the Joint Agreement will be different for virtually every individual government agency and, as a result, the analysis required must be done by each agency on an individual basis. To put the Joint Agreement in context, it is important to briefly review the history of this case as it pertains to Pool Participants. On December 6, 1994, the County of Orange filed two separate bankruptcy cases: one for the County (In Re Count of Orange, Bankruptcy Case No. SA94-22272-JR) and one or an entity o t e County entitled The Orange County Investment Pools (In Re Orange County Investment Pools, Bankruptcy Case No. SA94-22� JR) . T2- fi ing or these two separate bankruptcy cases was intended by the County to identify the separate assets and interests of the Pools as opposed to the rights of general creditors of the County of Orange. There may have also been a political interest in attempting to distance the County of Orange from the operations of the Treasurer's Office in connection with the investment decisions leading up to the $1 .64 billion loss sustained by the Pool . Shortly after the filing of the bankruptcy cases, the County announced its intent to challenge the entitlement of Pool Participants to recover their deposits in the Pool under the provisions of California law intended to protect Pool Participant deposits from invasion by a County under circumstances mirroring those in this case. (California Government Code S 27100.1, and others. ) Long term denial of access by Pool Participants to their deposits in the Orange County Investment Pools threatened the economic viability of a substantial number of Pool Participants. After the filing of the two bankruptcy cases, the United States Trustee for the Central District of California, Marcy Tiffany, formed a special committee to represent Pool depositors in the Pool case. This committee consists of seven members: Chairman, Stan Oftelie of the Orange County Transportation Authority ( ^OCTA^) ; Andrew Czorny of the Orange County Water District; Blake Anderson of the Orange County Sanitation District; Paul Brady, City Manager of the City of Irvine (representing a special subcommittee of Orange County cities) ; John Nelson, Assistant Superintendent of the Orange County Department of Education (representing a special subcommittee of Orange County schools) ; Walter Kreutzen of the Transportation Corridor Agencies; and Michael Martello, City Attorney of the City of Mountain View (representing a special subcommittee of 26666773 December 27, 1995 Page 3 non-Orange County agencies) . This committee became known as the OCIP Committee. The OCIP Committee began meeting almost daily in early January and crafted, along with the County, an interim funding mechanism to meet the emergency needs of Pool Participants. The intent of that facility was to provide the minimal funding required to keep the constituent agencies of the OCIP financially alive during the time necessary to resolve the dispute between the OCIP Committee and the County regarding Pool Participants ' entitlement to their deposits in the investment Pools. That interim facility operated successfully through May of 1995 and disbursed over $900,000,000. During that same period of time, the Pool Committee conducted extensive financial analysis and legal research on the issue of whether Pool Participants could recover all their deposits from the Orange County Investment Pools, leaving the County to bear the entire $1.64 billion loss against their December 6, 1994 deposit balance of approximately $2 .3 billion. There was support for that position, including the specific intent of Government Code g 27100. 1, the reliance of Pool Participants upon the County for investment policies and capital protection, and the revelation of numerous financial irregularities relating to Pool Participants ' interests in the Pools pre-bankruptcy (the skimming of interest, misallocation of assets, and other similar activities) . In other words, there were good legal and equitable arguments for requiring the County to sustain the loss in the Investment Pools from its own deposit balance. However, there was another side to the argument. Notwithstanding the culpability of the County for the intentional and unintentional losses in the Pools, certain principles that apply generally in bankruptcy cases, though never specifically applied to a case of this type, provided the possibility for a different result. These arguments, in brief, start with the general disfavor trust interests are accorded in bankruptcy cases, because such interests run contrary to.general bankruptcy concepts of equitable distribution to similar claimants. Additionally, the legal foundation for the trust position asserted by Pool Participants in this case was uniquely a matter of California law. There was thus the potential for statutory interpretation, and Tenth Amendment Constitutional issues, to be in controversy. Specifically, it was unclear whether California was entitled to structure a unique distribution priority for municipal entities in bankruptcy inconsistent with general bankruptcy principles. 20846332 December 27, 1995 Page 4 In other words the issue presented a case of first impression with billions of dollars, and the economic lives of the Pool Participants, at stake, and good arguments on both sides. ' Moreover, a number of Pool Participants had municipal financings coming due in June of 1995 for which a substantial portion of their Pool deposits were required. Litigation of the trust issue, even if successful at the trial court level, would if appealed probably not produce an actual disbursement of funds by the County within the timeframe necessary to meet the June 30 1 As most of you know, the issue of the trust status of the Orange County Investment Pools was recently litigated in the context of a Motion to Dismiss brought by Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith in the case filed against it by the County. Among other arguments, Merrill Lynch contended that, under California Government Code S 27100 . 1, the assets in the Orange County Investment Pools belonged to Pool Participants, not the County. Further, any losses sustained by the Pool would be losses of the Pool Participants, not the County. On December 1, 1995, Bankruptcy Judge John Ryan addressed for the first time the critical trust issue in the context of the Merrill Lynch motion. Judge Ryan denied the motion. In his opinion, Judge Ryan specifically found that here where the trust managed by the County is assumed to be insolvent, and where deposits can not be definitively traced, the trust fails and the Pool assets become assets of the County of Orange. Judge Ryan concluded that the protection to Pool Participants under Government Code S 27100. 1 failed because it was inconsistent with the federal bankruptcy principle of equitable, uniform distribution of assets in insolvent estates . While it is unclear whether this decision would have been the same had it been litigated earlier, and it is equally unclear whether it will withstand appeal, at least on the face of it a good argument can be made that had the OCIP Committee elected to litigate the trust theory back in May of this year, the court would have made the same findings, in which case the County would have had access to the entire $5.3 billion proceeds from the sale of the Pool securities. The County would then have been entitled to distribute those proceeds to its unsecured creditors, including all municipal noteholders, vendors and all labor claimants, along with Pool Participants. Under those circumstances, the recovery by Pool Participants would have been much less than the $4. 1 billion in cash recovered so far. The County•s "fresh start" may have occurred months ago at the cost of the financial vitality of numerous Pool Participants. 20046332 December 27, 1995 Page 5 deadline for Pool Participants having municipal obligations maturing at that time. The Pool Committee crafted with the County a "settlement" of its collective claims of entitlement to all Pool Participant deposits under the trust theory in an agreement entitled the "Comprehensive Settlement Agreement" ( "CSA") . Under this agreement, approximately 80% of non-school deposit balances and 90% of school deposit balances have been or should shortly be released. The remaining account balances would be allowed in full; however, there would be different repayment entitlements on those balances. A portion of the remaining balance would be entitled to general unsecured creditor treatment with a credit enhancement from recoveries from third party litigation ( "Settlement Secured Claims") , and another portion would be in a subordinated position ( "Repayment Claims") . This compensation package was available to Pool Participants agreeing to assign and collectivize their claims against third party defendants. Most Pool Participants elected this option. Fourteen Pool Participants, primarily non-Orange County entities, elected a different package of compensation, retaining their third-party litigation rights. Approximately $4. 1 billion dollars has been distributed to Pool Participants to date in accordance with the CSA. The County has since been unsuccessful in obtaining taxpayer funding to refill the $1.64 billion dollar hole left by the losses sustained by the Pool, and the amounts of deficit hidden until the filing of the bankruptcy case. The County was successful in obtaining the agreement of noteholders to the idea of "rolling" their obligations from fiscal 1994-1995 into fiscal 1995-1996, a procedure which on its face appears to contradict several government code statutes and Constitutional provisions. The OCIP Committee raised these issues before the Bankruptcy Court, without success, and those issues are now on appeal. Since August of this year, the County has attempted to craft a Plan of Adjustment which would allow it to emerge from bankruptcy. For a number of reasons, including its diminished credit rating and its inability to obtain any tax revenue from its citizens, the County' s plan for recovery inevitably turned back to the revenues and assets of Pool Participants whose financial condition and operations were more regularly conducted, and whose economic health was more vital. The initial assault by the County was across the board to the interests of virtually all Pool Participants. Legislative realities circumscribed the County•s efforts. Ultimately, a 20846332 December 27, 1995 Page 6 legislative package was approved which, in essence, calls for the State to divert a net amount of $15 million per year for 15 years from the Orange County Transportation Authority and $12 million per year for 20 years from Harbors, Beaches and Parks, the Flood Control District, and the County Development Agency. These diverted funds will be pledged to finance the issuance of new municipal debt, the proceeds of which will be used to pay off the "rolled" municipal debt and other obligations of the County. While the legislative package is still violative of the interests of some Pool Participants, and will have an impact on transportation and on future infrastructure construction in Orange County, it was considered the least destructive of the various alternatives that were considered by the legislature. However, this limited invasion of Pool Participants ' assets was crafted with certain expectations relating to the remaining claims of Pool Participants. Namely, it was anticipated that Pool Participants would be willing to relieve the County of their remaining Pool-Related Claims (approximately $850 million) and have those claims become recourse only against third party litigation recoveries. Were this assumption not correct, the County was prepared to argue that further invasions of Pool Participants ' assets and/or tax revenues would be required to enable the County to pay all of its obligations under the Plan of Adjustment. The next level of asset and/or tax diversion would have been at the expense of cities and special districts, and the representatives of those constituencies on the OCIP Committee were insistent on avoiding that possibility. The concept of making the remaining Pool Participant Pool- Related Claims non-recourse to the County, but recourse against third party litigation recoveries, is incorporated into the Joint Agreement. In addition to the concepts described above, other related issues, and nonrelated issues of importance to specific Pool Participant constituencies, are also addressed in the Joint Agreement. Of particular concern to Orange County cities is the treatment of, and access to, Pool Participant interests in certain County Administered Accounts ( "CAAs" ) . These are accounts kept on the books and records of the County which hold funds on behalf of Pool Participants, and sometimes the County, for specific purposes. Under the CSA, the CAAs were deemed to have suffered percentage losses in the Pools similar to the losses deemed to have occurred to the deposit balances of specific Pool Participant agencies. The remaining balances in these County-administered accounts are, in many cases, owned in part by Pool Participants. However, Pool Participants have not 20S46222 December 27, 1995 Page 7 had access to these funds since the filing of the bankruptcy case on December 6, 1994, and absent agreement with the County, the County has no inclination to release these funds to Pool Participants until the case is concluded, probably not earlier than June of next year. In addition, certain CAAs have funds which reflect unique interests of parties, like the Eminent Domain account, and the treatment of these accounts in a manner inconsistent with the treatment of other CAAs was also a matter of great interest to the Committee. The Joint Agreement requires the County to immediately distribute the cash balances in numerous CAA's to Pool Participants, to the extent of their undisputed claims against those accounts. It further provides a mechanism for recovering the deficiencies in those accounts. The Joint Agreement also announces, as part of the financial limitations of the County of Orange, the discontinuation of the Arterial Highway Funding Program ( "AHFP") by the County of Orange. This program, previously in existence for over 40 years, provided disbursement of approximately $3.5 million a year by the County of Orange to various Orange County cities for the maintenance and improvement of certain roads and highways. The program was administered by the Orange County Transportation Authority. It is the intent of the County to confirm with Pool Participants that the AHFP will be discontinued. Pool Participants acknowledge in the Joint Agreement the County' s discontinuation of the program and agree that the OCTA will not be obligated in the future to fund the AHFP. It was important to the OCIP Committee that third-party litigation be conducted in an environment insulated from political influences in County politics. The Committee has agreed to accept Thomas W. Hayes as the representative entitled to make all critical decisions relating to the litigation. The Joint Agreement describes the scope of Mr. Hayes ' authority and relationship to the County and the Committee. The Option B Pool Participants expressed concerns that the Joint Agreement not be inadvertently construed in a manner adverse to the claims they hold under the CSA. In response, specific language has been added to confirm that there are no third-party beneficiaries to the agreement, nor is the agreement intended to adversely affect the interests of third parties, including Option B Pool Participants. The Joint Agreement establishes a priority schedule for disbursement of third-party litigation proceeds. Of note to Pool Participants is the fact that Orange County schools receive a priority in excess of $50 million from the first distributions 20046332 December 27, 1995 Page 8 of litigation proceeds available for Pool Participants. This priority was granted to schools in response to the Committee's interests in re-establishing the financial stability of the school system, and to respond to the interest of the State legislature to bring the schools into compliance with funding requirements necessary to prevent state intervention. The Joint Agreement provides for the establishment of a five-person monitoring committee to ensure that the Plan of Adjustment conforms to the provisions of the Joint Agreement, so that the parties executing the Joint Agreement without the benefit of the information normally available in the Plan of Adjustment and/or Disclosure Statement, will be protected from inadvertent mistake, manipulation or surprise. The Committee is comprised of two representatives of the County, two representatives of the Pool Committee (one of which must be a cities representative) , and Mr. Hayes. This committee ceases its function upon the confirmation of the County' s Plan of Adjustment. There are a number of other important provisions in the Joint Agreement which apply to the interests of various Pool Participants, and a careful reading of the Agreement is required. On Monday, December 18, the OCIP Committee considered the final draft of the Joint Agreement and approved the agreement with its support for distribution to Pool Participants as soon as possible. It is hoped that each Pool Participant entity will give this matter its earliest and fullest consideration and will act on it as promptly as possible. As with the CSA, the financial and legal representatives of the Committee are available to you to answer your questions in connection with your deliberations. This Joint Agreement constitutes the next major step in the case on behalf of Pool Participants. It has been closely considered by the Committee and its professionals. While it is not a completely attractive approach in that it does not assure payment of the remaining claims of Pool Participants, it does have some benefits which you might want to consider as part of your deliberations, including the following: 1. The County undertakes not to seek any further diversion of Pool Participants ' assets or tax revenues in connection with this case. This is of particular interest to Orange County cities and special districts; 2"46])3 December 27, 1995 = Page 9 2. With respect to entities having interests in CAAs, those parties signing the Joint Agreement will have immediate access to their account balances, while those not signing the Joint Agreement may not have immediate access to those balances; 3. With respect to schools, there is a distribution priority from litigation proceeds in excess of $50 million; 4. With respect to all Pool Participants, those signing the Joint Agreement will avoid the possible appointment of a State Trustee,2 and will receive the priority of distribution of litigation proceeds set forth in the Agreement. These considerations are benefits to which Pool Participants would not be automatically entitled under a Plan of Adjustment, or otherwise. Ultimately, each entity needs to be prepared to weigh the prospect of losing recourse status for its allowed claims against the County in return for a different percentage of litigation proceeds. This is a difficult analysis because it is impossible at this point to know what the actual value of Pool Participants' remaining claims are against the County, because we do not know the County's capacity to make payment on those claims. Likewise, it is impossible at this stage of the litigation to be able to value the Merrill Lynch, or recently filed Peat Marwick, litigation. Those litigations could prove to be very valuable. On the other hand, they could be defeated in their entirety by technical defenses which have yet to be surfaced. What can be said is that, as of this date, the County' s Second Amended Complaint has survived a motion to dismiss by Merrill Lynch, and the comments of the Judge at the hearing on the motion to dismiss were such that it does not appear that the Complaint, or its principal component parts, are subject to immediate dismissal on technical grounds. No responsive pleadings have yet been filed in the Peat Marwick litigation. There is likely to be other litigations filed by the County against brokers and professionals relating to pre-bankruptcy actions . 2 Under the recovery legislation enacted in October of this year, a State Trustee could, under certain conditions, be appointed by the Governor for the County and for any Pool Participant to facilitate the Plan of Adjustment. 20666332 December 27, 1995 Page 10 The Orange County bankruptcy case is moving into its final stage with the submission and confirmation of a Plan of Adjustment. The County filed its Plan of Adjustment on Thursday, December 21. The bankruptcy court extended the time for the County to file its Disclosure Statement, which is the narrative description of the Plan of Adjustment with related projections and financial material, until January 19, 1996 . It is the intent of the County to obtain confirmation of the Plan of Adjustment by May of 1996. I£ the Joint Agreement is approved by overwhelming numbers of Option A Pool Participants, and the Plan of Adjustment is confirmed incorporating the material elements of the Joint Agreement, the County will likely emerge from this bankruptcy case by the summer of 1996. Thereafter, third party litigation will be prosecuted by the Representative on behalf of the County and Pool Participants . This case continues to be a monumental effort on the part of the OCIP Committee. The members of the Committee have placed the collective interests of the community above their own, and have established a disciplined and successful course and direction for Pool Participants as a united constituency. This Joint Agreement is being presented to you as the next step in the bankruptcy process and it has been approved unanimously by the OCIP Committee. If you have any questions, or would like to have a further presentation by the financial or legal professionals of the Committee, please telephone me as soon as possible. If your municipal entity supports the Joint Agreement, an appropriately executed signature page must be returned to Price Waterhouse LLP, attention Bernar Burke, 575 Anton Boulevard, Suite 1100, Costa Mesa, CA 92626. Thank you for your continued courtesies and support in this case. Very sincerely, Patrick-C. Shea PCs/wpc cc: Official Committee of Pool Participants and Counsel 20846332 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY of JOINT AGREEMENT OF THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, THE OFFICIAL INVESTMENT POOL PARTICIPANTS' COMMITTEE, AND EACH OPTION A POOL PARTICIPANT FOR RESOLUTION OF CLAIMS AGAINST THE COUNTY OF ORANGE (THE "JOINT AGREEMENT") THIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY IS BEING PROVIDED TO YOU FOR YOUR CONVENIENCE ONLY, AND IS NOT INTENDED TO BE, AND SHOULD NOT BE, RELIED UPON BY YOU IN . DETERMINING WHETHER TO ENTER INTO THE JOINT AGREEMENT. YOU SHOULD CAREFULLY REVIEW THE JOINT AGREEMENT IN ITS ENTIRETY WITH YOUR COUNSEL AND OTHER PROFESSIONALS. THIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO THE JOINT AGREEMENT. IN THE EVENT OF ANY INCONSISTENCY BETWEEN THE JOINT AGREEMENT AND THIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY, THE TERMS OF THE JOINT AGREEMENT SHALL CONTROL. THE JOINT AGREEMENT WILL AFFECT THE RIGETE OF ALL OPTION A POOL PARTICIPANTS WHO SIGN THE JOINT AGREEMENT AS THOSE RIGHTS CURRENTLY EXIST UNDER THE COMPREHENSIVE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT RE ORANGE COUNTY INVESTMENT POOLS (THE "CSA") . IN MANY CASES, THAT EFFECT MAY BE ADVERSE. INTRODUCTION In response to the voters' defeat of the Measure R Sales Tax proposal, the County of Orange (the "County") has engaged in the process of developing an alternative recovery plan which relies, in part, upon the diversion of future tax revenues from other local governmental entities within the County. Included among those from which the County sought reappropriation by the California State Legislature was the Orange County Transportation Authority (the "OCTA") . In order to limit the County's access to the assets and revenues of special districts and cities, most of which suffered substantial losses as a result of the collapse of the Orange County Investment Pools, the Orange County Investment Pool Participants Committee (the "Pool Committee") has negotiated the terms of the accompanying Joint Agreement. Of particular note to Option A Pool Participants is Paragraph 12 of the Joint Agreement in which the county agrees, G\20066630.NP1 2221.5 -1 except for the recovery legislation that was passed in September of 1995: "not to request of the Legislature, nor otherwise support if requested or approved by any entity other than the County, the diversion of revenue allocated to the undersigned Option A Pool Participant for the purpose of financing the repayment of claims in the County's debt adjustment case or the payment of claims under the County's Plan of Adjustment." This provision is intended to make it politically difficult for the County to seek, and to provide substantial moral suasion against the County seeking, further diversions of revenues from other local governmental entities within the County.However, this provision does not seek to preclude the County from seeking such reappropriations in response to natural disasters or other cir- cumstances beyond the payment of claims against the County in connection with its bankruptcy proceeding. The Joint Agreement may, in some cases, improve the status of the remaining outstanding claims of an Option A Pool Participant which signs the Joint Agreement (a "Participating Option A Pool Participant") ; and, in other cases, it may worsen it. Each Option A Pool Participant should consider carefully the impact of the Joint Agreement upon its rights under the CSA and applicable law and the potential benefits to be derived by such Pool Participant from the provisions of the Joint Agreement. CONSENSUS LEGISLATION In accordance with the Joint Agreement, the California State Legislature passed on September 15, 1995, and Governor Wilson subsequently signed into law, several bills which will, upon becoming effective: 1. Reallocate to the County $38 million of sales tax revenue currently allocated to the OCTA or the Orange County Transit District for a period of 15 years beginning July 1, 1996; 2. Reallocate to the OCTA $23 million of the County's yearly apportionment of Motor Vehicle Fuel Taxes for a 16 year period beginning July 1, 1997; 3. Reallocate to the County $4 million of property taxes per year for a period of 20 years (plus 0\Z006663Z.W 12211S -2- increments in such taxes in (a) and (b) below) beginning July 1, 1996 from each of: (a) the County Harbors, Beaches and Parks Fund; (b) the County Flood Control Fund; and (c) the County Development Agency. The effect of this legislation will be to divert $15 million per year for 15 years (a total of $225 million) from the OCTA to the County, along with $12 million per year for 20 years ($240 million in total) from County-controlled agencies to the County to fund the issuance of new municipal debt. The proceeds of the new debt issue will be used to pay off the County's pre- bankruptcy note holders and certain other creditors. Such legislation is to take effect only if a Plan of Adjustment for the County consistent with the Joint Agreement is confirmed in the County's bankruptcy or upon the appointment of a trustee for the County by the Governor as described in the last paragraph of this Executive Summary. Under the recovery legis- lation, all revenues received by the County pursuant to such legislation must be used for the performance of the County's obligations under its Plan of Adjustment. If any of the diver- sions from Flood Control, Harbors, Beaches and Parks, or the Redevelopment Agency are successfully challenged, the County is required to make up the shortfall from the County general account. TERMS OF THE PLAN OF ADJUSTMENT The Joint Agreement requires the County to prepare and file as soon as possible, and by no later than January 1, 1996, a Plan of Adjustment which contains, in substance, the terms and conditions specified in the Joint Agreement. Under the Joint Agreement, participating Option A Pool Participants waive all rights to object to, and agree to accept, any County Plan of Adjustment which contains provisions incorporating the material terms in the Joint Agreement. Importantly, under the Joint Agreement, the County's Plan may provide for payment in full of the allowed claims of all County vendors, employees and short term note debt. It also permits the County to restore up to $15 million in reserve for County Certificates of Participation which have previously been depleted. Under the CSA, Settlement Secured Claims are "allowed general unsecured claims against the County. " Repayment Claims 6IMNI.31,.Pi 122195 -3- are defined under the CSA as "allowed . . . claims" against the County as well, but the holder of a Repayment Claim "shall not be entitled to receive . any payment . . . from the County [other than from the proceeds of the litigation of Pool-Related Claims (as defined in the CSA) against third parties] until after the payment in full of all Senior Claims against the County and the payment in full of all interest on such Senior Claims which accrues or matures after the County Petition Date . . . . " The "Senior Claims" to which Repayment Claims are subordinated under the CSA include the vendor and employee claims and the short term notes which may be paid in full under the County's Plan pursuant to the Joint Agreement, the $275 million in Recovery Bonds issued by the County, the proceeds of which were paid to Option A Pool Participants in June of this year, and Option A Pool Participants' Settlement Secured Claims. Under the CSA, the County may also restore a portion of the losses suffered by County Administered Accounts in advance of making any payment on Repayment Claims other than from the proceeds of the Pool- Related Claim litigation. Under the Joint Agreement, both Settlement Secured Claims and Repayment Claims would become non-recourse claims. This means that they would no longer be debts for which the County would be responsible. Rather, holders of Settlement Secured Claims and Repayment Claims could look only to the proceeds of third-party litigation of Pool-Related Claims and to the $50 million litigation fund to he set up under the Joint Agreement to prosecute those claims. A five member Orange County Recovery Committee ("OCRA") is to be appointed to evaluate the County's Plan of Adjustment for consistency with the Joint Agreement and the CSA. Its members will be Mr. Hayes, two individuals appointed by the County and two individuals appointed by the Pool Committee, one of whom is to be a city representative. The OCRA would be disbanded once the County's Plan of Adjustment is confirmed. POOL-RELATED CLAIMS LITIGATION The County's Plan must also provide for the appointment of a Representative under Section 1123 (b) (3) (B) of the Bankruptcy Code to "enforce, prosecute and collect upon" all of the County's and Option A Pool Participants' Pool-Related Claims against the brokerage houses, banks and professionals which are, at least in part, responsible for the losses in the Orange County Investment Pools. The Representative is required to keep the Pool Committee and its counsel informed concerning the progress of such litiga- G\Z00666JI.NR, 122295 -4- tion, including in the manner specified in Exhibit 6 to the CSA. However, the Representative would have "the sole and absolute discretion in all matters concerning the prosecution, collection, settlement and compromise of Pool-Related Claims subject only to such jurisdiction as may be retained by the Bankruptcy Court pursuant to the Plan of Adjustment." Under the Joint Agreement, the Representative also has "sole and absolute discretion" in determining what portions of the net proceeds from the litigation of such claims are to be distributed and when, although the legislation recently passed by the California State Legislature requires that all interest earned on the Litigation Fund be distributed annually. The Representative will initially be Mr. Tom Hayes. DISTRIBUTION OF LITIGATION PROCEEDS Under the CSA net proceeds from Pool-Related Claims litigation are to be distributed approximately 62% (rather than 65% had all Pool Participants elected Option A under the CSA) to the holders of Settlement Secured Claims and approximately 38% to the County until all Settlement Secured Claims are paid in full (a total of $525,457,359) . Then, approximately 62% of the net proceeds of such litigation are to be distributed to the holders of Repayment Claims and approximately 38% to the County until the Repayment Claims are paid in full (a total of an addi- tional approximately $798, 367,684) . Thereafter, the County is entitled to retain all of the net proceeds of such litigation until it has received at least $236.7 million. Under the Joint Agreement, the first $54.7 million in the net proceeds of such litigation would be paid to satisfy Repayment Claims held by the Option A Pool Participants listed on Exhibit 1 to the CSA (the "Schools") . The next $325 million of the net proceeds of such Pool-Related Claim litigation would be paid to the holders of Settlement Secured Claims to repay those claims in full. This means that holders of Settlement Secured Claims would fare worse under the Joint Agreement until approximately $144 million in net litigation proceeds have been collected; then they would fare better until the Settlement Secured Claims are paid in full. After all Settlement Secured Claims are paid in full, the next $202.8 million of net litigation proceeds would be distributed solely to the County, $22 million of which may be used by the County solely to settle the claims of the option B Pool Participants. Thereafter, the next $713 million in net litigation proceeds would be distributed 61_59$ to the, holders of Repayment Claims and approximately 38.41% to the County. G\Z0 631.IMI 122196 -5- Accordingly, under the Joint Agreement, holders of Repayment Claims, other than the Schools, would be in a worse position than. they would be under the CSA until such claims are paid in full. After $1.295.5 billion in net litigation proceeds has been collected, in order to restore a portion of the funds diverted from the OCTA under the recovery legislation described above, the OCTA would receive approximately 43% of the next $525 million in net litigation proceeds and the County would retain the balance. Thereafter, net litigation proceeds would be split between Option A Pool Participants and the County 61. 59%/38.41%. Under the Joint Agreement any portion of the $50 million Litigation Fund which is not used in pursuing Pool- Related Claims would also be available for distribution in accordance with the scheme described above. No such fund is established under the CSA. Lastly, the Joint Agreement requires the County to apply the first net litigation proceeds it receives under the scheme described above to repay the claims of Option A Pool Participants against certain enumerated County Administered Accounts which the Pool Committee and the County have identified as containing the funds of some option A Pool Participants. No such provision exists under the CSA. TREATMENT OF CLAIMS AGAINST COUNTY ADMINISTERED ACCOUNTS Promptly after execution and Bankruptcy Court approval of the Joint Agreement, the County is required to distribute to those Option A Pool Participants that sign the Joint Agreement, to the extent they are lawfully entitled to such amounts under applicable non-bankruptcy law and to the extent of any portion of a claim therefor is not being disputed by the County, all amounts which remain, after allocation of the Orange County Investment Pool losses, and including both pre- and post- petition interest earned on the cash balances therein, in 54 specified County Administered Accounts and such other accounts as the Pool Committee and the County may jointly agree. In return, Participating Option A Pool Participants agree not to object to any other distributions from such accounts to those who are legally entitled to those distributions. Under Paragraph 8 (i) of the Joint Agreement, the County's Plan of Adjustment must provide that "all claims based upon . deficiencies in County Administered Accounts resulting from . . . losses in the Orange County Investment Pools . held by the County will receive the same treatment" as such claims held by Option A Pool Participants. cN2202 W.W I22D5 -6- However, under the Joint Agreement, the Plan may provide for the payment of such claims to Option A Pool Participants over a period of 20 years without interest. The Joint Agreement calls for all Participating Option A Pool Participants to also waive any post-petition, post-confirmation and post-effective date interest on their claims for recovery of the deficits in the County Administered Accounts. The County also waives its rights to interest on the deficits in all County Administered Accounts and agrees that the $13.4 million County Administered Account deficit claims of the Schools with respect to 19 unapportioned tax accounts maintained by the County shall be paid before the County's own claims. Participating Non-School option A Pool Participants would agree to a similar time of payment priority for the schools. MISCELLANEOUS CONTRACTUAL PROVISIONS Participating Option A Pool Participants and the Pool Committee agree to suspend and, upon Bankruptcy Court approval of the County's Plan of Adjustment, to dismiss with prejudice all appeals they have pending relating to the Bankruptcy Court's Order of June 27, 1995 approving the County's compromise with its short term note holders regarding the validity of their note debt and approving the roll-over of that debt to June 30, 1996. It is a condition to the effectiveness of the Joint Agreement, which the County has the sole ability to waive, that the Orange County Cities Subcommittee separately agree to do so as well. The Joint Agreement also confirms the discontinuation of the County Is Arterial Highway Financing Program (the 11AHFP") . Under that program the County provided funding of over $3 million per year, administered by the OCTA, for distribution to Orange County cities for the repair and improvement of roads and high- ways throughout the County. The parties to the Joint Agreement specifically agree that the AHFP will not be funded in the future by either the County or the OCTA. There are also provisions in the Joint Agreement for the accounts of the Schools Subcommittee and the Orange County Cities Subcommittee in the Professional Fee Reserve established under the CSA to be replenished with a portion the Withheld Proceeds ($2 million and $1.2 million, respectively) which would otherwise be distributed under the CSA to Schools and option A Orange County Cities. The Joint Agreement would become effective only if: a. signed by all Option A Pool Participants (a condition which the County can waive) ; and 0\200666)F.NAF 122196 -7 b. the Joint Agreement is approved by the Bankruptcy Court. ' TREATMENT OF POOL PARTICIPANTS WHO DO NOT SIGN JOINT AGREEMENT Paragraph 20 of the Joint Agreement provides that there are to be no third party beneficiaries of the Joint Agreement and that the Joint Agreement is not intended to waive any claims against or adversely affect the rights of any person or entity which is not a party to the agreement. Other than that, the Joint Agreement is silent as to the effect of the agreement upon Option A Pool Participants which choose n= to sign it or upon Option B Pool Participants (which are not being asked to sign the agreement) . This means that Option A Pool Participants holding Settlement Secured Claims would not benefit from the County's agreement to permit net proceeds from Pool-Related Claims litigation to be applied first to such claims, nor would such Pool Participants' Settlement Secured or Repayment Claims be voluntarily made non-recourse or subordinated other than as provided now in the CSA. However, the bills passed by the State Legislature include a mechanism for the appointment of a trustee by the Governor if the County fails to file a Plan of Adjustment con- sistent with the Joint Agreement by January 1, 1996 or if the Governor determines that as of May 1, 1996 or at any time there- after the County, the Committee of Unsecured Creditors and the Pool Committee "have failed to reach substantial agreement on the terms of a plan of adjustment and the timely confirmation of the plan appears unlikely." The trustee would have not only all of the powers of the Board of Supervisors, but also, "solely to the extent necessary to prevent denial of confirmation of the plan of adjustment " the following powers, among others, of Non- County Pool Participants which are governmental entities: a. to vote to accept or reject the Plan of Adjustment; and b. to subordinate or otherwise restructure Pool Participants' claims against the County which are based upon investment losses in the Pools. In other words, if a trustee is appointed for the County, that trustee could, but would not be required to, agree to the treat- ment of a Pool Participant's claims against the County in the manner specified in the Joint Agreement or in a manner which is better or worse than that specified in the Joint Agreement. The only constraint upon the trustee in exercising such powers on behalf of Pool Participants is that he "not act in a manner inconsistent with the fair treatment of any [such Pool Participants) . " c\:ooscor.Ml 122115 —8— jhN-23-96 TUE 16:10 _ P. U7 PILLSBURY MADISON 6 SUTRO San Francisco 101 V. Broadway Los Angeles San Jose Suite 1800 Dashington, D.C. Sacramento San Diego. CA 92102-8083 Orange County Menlo Park Tel (619)234-5000 Fax (619)236-1995 Nov York Hong gong Tokyo January 23, 1996 FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL TOY Blake Anderson (714) 962-0356 Paul Brady (714) 724-6045 Andrew Czorny (714) 378-3372 Walter Kreutzen (714) 436-9848 Michael D. Martello (415) 967-4215 John L. Nelson (714) 662-3570 Stan Oftelie (714) 560-5796 Kennard R. Smart (714) 835-7787 Alan G. Tippie (213) 629-4520 Merrill R. Francis (213) 620-1390 G. Larry Engel (714) 752-7522 Allan H. Ickowitz (213) 612-7801 Clark F. Ide (714) 378-3373 Paul R. Glassman (310) 312-9507 John T. Hansen (415) 398-2438 Alan Martin (714) 851-0739 Thomas L, Woodruff (714) B35-7787 John J. Giovannone (714) 851-0739 B. Freddie Reiss (213) 622-5063+ Michael Ozawa (714) 435-8774 Jon Schotz (310) 920-0313 FROM: Patrick C. Shea, Esq. USSR NO. :11364PCS (J. Samala) FILE NO. : 66345-100-0001 NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER SHEET: 3 IF YOU HAVE NOT PROPERLY RECEIVED THIS FACSIMILE, PLEASE CALL OS AT (619)234-5000 THANK YOU. Letter to Pool Participants regarding status of Merrill Lynch litigation. OPERATOR: TIME ENT: w 7HR INFORMATION GOHTAINEO S TAW SAGE IS ATTORNEY PEIVILIUSU ADD Sam IAL nR58MA]'i ED Y OSE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY SAW AIM. Iy T08 READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE ISTISIXED RRCIPIEHT, OR TIM m@nnEE UR AGENT RESMSIBLE TO DEAMM IT TO TBE INIRNDFD RECIFIENT, YOU ARE RESENT NOTIFIED 1DAT ANY DINEMATLOD. DISINSSUTIDN OR COPYING OF =8 COMMUNICATION IS STRICTLY 1E031511RD. IF Too SAVE RECEIVED THIS QDaUHlCAl'ION IN SRPOR. FLEASE Iq®TATMLY NOTIFY US by TTIMMINR, AND RETOFD THE ORSGIRAL MESSAGE TO US AT THE A= ADDRESS VIA THE U.S. F027AL SESVICR. TUN YOU. 20olo5: JM-23-96 TUE 16:11 V.UZ I/W of il[fb ai PILLSBURY MADISON G SUTRO LLP c.Y[p.Nacco sun[ iaeo •W+NOais 101 WE TBpoAVN'Av eWMaL COV MT LMN�ocL MGNIN OTOM.O.c. LAN a1E60. CALIFORNIA i2101��— NLM MNa 1MIiL p'B Oii1CL M10 TLLLDMON[01B1 316 O00 TOInIDO NOMO WNO OIO LCT O.A.M V YL[O i+®IN ILB MI.UB-IBBS N[W YOpF (619) 544-3177 January 22, 1996 VIA TELECOPIER TO! ORANGE COUNTY INVESTMENT POOL PARTICIPANTS ' DISTRIBUTION LIST Re: In re Count of Oran e, ankruptcy Case No. SA9 - 272-JR County of Orange v. Merrill Lynch 6 Co. , Inc. at al. Dear Pool Participant. This letter will update you regarding the status of the County of Orange litigation against Merrill Lynch. The principal parties have commenced taking depositions. Merrill Lynch appeared in Court today on a motion to stay the County's discovery until the depositions of Merrill Lynch employees can be coordinated with discovery proceedings in other bankruptcy-related litigation. Specifically, Merrill Lynch sought to avoid producing its representatives for deposition, including Mr. Michael Stamenson, until the County filed all of its complaints against other professionals and brokerage houses. Merrill Lynch argued that its representatives would otherwise risk being deposed in each adversary proceeding. (There are currently only two filed adversary proceedings - Merrill Lynch and MPMG Peat Marwick.) In addition, Merrill Lynch sought to lift the current stay on obtaining documents and testimony from Pool Participants. The Merrill Lynch motion was unsuccessful on both issues. In denying the Merrill Lynch request for consolidation, the Court reiterated its intention that the parties proceed with all non-Pool Participant discovery without limitation. In addition, the Court continued the stay on pool participants discovery to pending the hearing on the County's motion to strike portions of the Merrill Lynch Answer. That motion is scheduled to be heard February 16, 1996 at 9s3U a.m. JAN-23-96 TOE 16:06 uo To All Pool Participants January 22, 1996 Page 2 The parties reached an agreement regarding the exchange of SEC transcripts . Pursuant to this arrangement, Merrill Lynch and the County will exchange all SEC transcripts. The employees of Merrill Lynch and the County, including the Board of Supervisors, were given ten days to object to the production of their transcripts . If no objection is asserted, the transcript must be produced. Finally, the Court ruled that the deposition of Mr. Stamenson will go forward on January 29, 1996 . Mr. Stamenson has until January 25, 1996 to file any objection to the production of his SEC transcript. The Court has scheduled a hearing for Friday, January 26, 1996 at 3:30 p.m. to rule on the objections, if any. In general, these rulings indicate an intent by the Court to keeping the case moving. I will continue to keep you updated regarding the status of this matter. if you have any questions, you can reach me at (619) 544-3177 . Very truly yours" Awlt,e, Patrick C. She, yew PCs/sgm cc: Official Committee of Pool Participants and Counsel aues7m9 February 14, 1996 - — MEMORANDUM TO: Executive Committee Members FROM: Blake P. Anderson Chief Operations Officer SUBJECT: Questions and Answers re Joint Agreement The following information was prepared by Paul Glassman, attorney for the Cities. It is addressed to "Cities" but it also applies to "Special Districts." CBDOC • P.O.Boa 8127 0 Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 0 (714)962-2411 PAUL R. GLASSMAN A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 11400 WEST OLYMPIC BOULEVARD, SUITE 250 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90064 PHONE: (310) 312-9505 FAX: (310) 312-9507 February 8, 1996 To: Pool Participants Committee Re: In Re County of Orange Case No. SA-94-22272-JR Dear Committee Members: At the request of Paul Brady, I am providing you with a courtesy copy of the enclosed document entitled "The Joint Agreement: Questions and Answers" ("Q and A'). The Q and A was prepared for use by the Cities in connection with their analyses and review of the Joint Agreement of the County of Orange, the Official Investment Pool Participants' Committee and Each Option A Pool Participant for Resolution of Claims Against the County of Orange ("Joint Agreement). It was not prepared for use by or distribution to any other party. In addition to the above, there have been clarifications and changes requested from the County in regard to several issues relating to the Plan which may affect the answers given under the Q and A. It is also possible that the Plan of Adjustment and the Disclosure Statement may be amended in a way which would alter the answers given under the Q and A. For these and other reasons, the current answers to the Q and A may not be the "final" answers. �4� Paul R. Glassman P.C. & Mitchell, Sliberberg & Knupp The Joint Agreement: Questions and Answers 1. What payments will my City receive under the Joint Agreement and are their other benefits to the Cities under this agreement? If the Joint Agreement becomes "effective", each City which signs the Joint Agreement should receive approximately 75% of the "undisputed portion" of its County Administered a Accounts ("CAA" or "CAAs") within 30 days of the agreement becoming "effective". While the County has not definitively agreed to an "undisputed schedule" for the CAAs, the best information currently available is found in the last �. schedules of the CAAs provided by the County. The "disputed portion" will not be paid until the County and the affected City reach accommodation or the Bankruptcy Court determines the "allowed" amount. In addition to the above, the Joint Agreement provides for certain other benefits to the Cities, including but not limited to: a) the County's agreement not to seek further diversion of funds to finance its Plan of Adjustment ("Plan"); b) the Representative's control of the Merrill Lynch and other "Pool Related" litigation; c) the payment of Litigation Proceeds to the Cities under the Comprehensive Settlement Agreement ("CSA") will be reordered so that, depending upon the level of recovery, the Cities may be paid earlier; and d) through a side letter to the Joint Agreement, the County agrees to release certain "Withheld Proceeds." c Z I 2. What will my City give up under the Joint Agreement? If the Joint Agreement becomes "effective", each City which signs the Joint Agreement will waive most of its rights to object to the Plan and certain of its rights under the CSA will be modified. However, the Cities rights to sue designated third parties, including their own advisors, is not affected by the Joint Agreement. Please note that the Cities right to sue the County's advisors (e.g. Merrill Lynch and KPMG) for CAA losses was given up under the CSA. Under the CSA the Cities also gave up their rights to make a claim against the County for damages. 3. If my City signs the Joint Agreement, will its County Administered Account claims be paid within 30 days of signing? No. No payments will be made under the Joint Agreement �P`� until the Joint Agreement becomes "effective" (i.e. all Option A Pool Participants and the County sign the agreement and the Bankruptcy Court approves the agreement). 4. Can the Joint Agreement become "effective" if all Option A Pool Participants don't sign up7 Yes, but only the County can waive the requirement that all Option A Pool Participants must sign the Joint Agreement. Please note that the requirement that the Bankruptcy Court . approve the Joint Agreement is prohahly not waivable. 2 5. If my City chooses not to-sign the Joint Agreemcnt will its CAA claims still be paid? Currently, the County takes the position that only those Cities which execute the Joint Agreement (assuming that it becomes "effective") will he paid their CAA claims. The County also contends that there is no mechanism under the County's proposed Plan for paying CAAs to the Cities. If the County's position is correct, the CAA claim of a City which chooses not to sign the Joint Agreement will be in "legal limbo" and would probably be addressed through litigation, a new Plan or a separate settlement. 6. How will the undisputed "deficiency" or shortfall portion of the CAA claims be paid under the Joint Agreement? Notwithstanding the language in the Joint Agreement to the contrary, the County takes the position that the deficiencies/shortfalls in the CAAs are not paid under the Joint Agreement but are dealt with under the Plan. The current version of the Plan provides that most of these deficiency ,,DtrA claims will be paid out of certain Litigation Proceeds and related funds (as defined in the Plan) and Available Cash (also as dcfmcd in the Plan). Howcver, the Plan also provides that certain types of undisputed deficiency CAA claims--such as eminent domain claims-- will be restored in full on, or as promptly as possible after, the Effective Date or will be paid as provided by state law. 3 7. What does the Joint Agreement mean when it provides that CSA claims (i.e. the Settlement Secured Claims and Repayment Claims) are "non-recourse" against the County and "recourse" only against third party recoveries? This is a change in the rights of the Cities under the CSA. The "recourse" and "non-recourse" language in the Joint q3 Y Agreement mcans that the Cities are entitled to be paid their 5 Y CAA deficiency claims only out of the Litigation Proceeds and �; Available Cash and will not have any recourse against the LL County or its general funds. Under the CSA, the claims were previously "recourse" against the County and its general funds. 8. Are Option B Pool Participant Cities eligible to sign the Joint Agreement? The County takes the position that Option B Pool Participants Cities cannot participate in the Joint Agreement and that their rights are unaffected by the Joint Agreement 9. What does the five person Orange County Recovery Committee ("Committee") do and what is the Cities role on this Committee? The Committee reviews and evaluates any Plan of Adjustment or Disclosure Statement filed with the Bankruptcy Court to determine if they are inconsistent with the terns of the Joint Agreement and/or the Comprehensive Settlement Agreement. One of the members of the Committee will be a City representative. 4 10. What will Mr. Thomas Hayes role as the Representative entail? Mr. Hayes will have complete control over litigation, including, but not limited to the Merrill Lynch litigation and the KPMG litigation. He can settle, prosecute or dismiss litigation as he deems advisable. 11. Will the Governor appoint a "Trustee" for the County if the Joint Agreement becomes "effective"? Even if the Joint Agreement becomes "effective" the Governor will retain the right to appoint a Trustee if the Plan is not approved by the Bankruptcy Court by May 1, 1996. However, should the Governor choose to exercise this right he must first consult with various individuals delineated in the legislation and make a determination that the prospects of rcurganization are unlikely. 12. If my City approves the Joint Agreement, is it at the same time approving the Plan? No. They are separate, with the Joint Agreement being approved first and the Plan later. The Joint Agreement deals only with the CSA claims and a portion of the CAA claims (approximately 75%), while the Plan deals with the deficiency in the CAAs and all other claims. As a practical matter, a City which signs the Joint Agreement is waiving most of its rights to object to the Plan. (SEE ANSWER 2). 5 BANKRUPTCY UPDATE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING FEBRUARY 21 , 1996 THE JOINT AGREEMENT COMBINED WITH THE COUNTY'S DRAFT PLAN OF ADJUSTMENT WILL ACCOMPLISH THE FOLLOWING OBJECTIVES: • Helps end Orange County bankruptcy by June 1996. • Removes threat of a State-imposed Trustee. • Removes "cloud" over the municipal market. • Avoids further revenue diversions by the County. • Signing Option A Pool Participants will receive better priority in litigation recoveries. • Schools will receive super-priority on $55 million of litigation recoveries. • Available withheld proceeds paid immediately. ($6.2 million) • Undisputed , post-bankruptcy County administered accounts (plus interest), paid immediately. ($ 1 .8 million for CSDOC) • CAA deficiencies of $234 million paid over 20 years without interest with first payment priority to schools ($15.5 million) HELPS END ORANGE COUNTY BANKRUPTCY • County filed a Plan of Adjustment on Dec. 21 , 1995. • County filed a Disclosure Statement on Jan. 19, 1996. • Signing Pool Participants cannot object to the Plan of Adjustment if it complies with the material terms and conditions in the May Comprehensive Settlement Agreement and the December Joint Agreement. • Five-member Orange County Recovery Committee will monitor compliance with the plan. - Tom Hayes will chair the Committee, - Two County-named members; Two OCIP-named members (one of which will be a City representative). • Tom Hayes "to enforce, prosecute and collect upon" County and OCIP claims against Merrill Lynch and others. SIGNING OPTION A POOL PARTICIPANTS WILL RECEIVE ADDITIONAL PRIORITY IN LITIGATION RECOVERIES LAYER MILLIONS BENEFICIARY TOTAL 1 $54.7 Schools $ 54.7 2 325.0* Option A 379.9 3 202.8 County 582.7 4 712.8** Option A/County (62/38) 1295.5 5 400.0 OCTA/County (25/75) 1695.5 6 125.0 OCTA 1820.5 7 Balance Option A/County (62/38) `Settlement Secured Claims. `*Includes Unsecured Repayment Claims. REMOVES THREAT OF A STATE-IMPOSED TRUSTEE • Governor, according to state legislation , may appoint a trustee if: - After January 1 , 1996 a Plan of Adjustment has not been submitted to the Bankruptcy Court (Plan submitted); - After May 1 , 1996 there is not substantial agreement on the Plan of Adjustment. • Trustee can force Pool Participants to "agree" by a) voting on their behalf or, b) subordinating their claims. • The use of the Trustee's powers shall not be inconsistent with "fair treatment" under the Joint Agreement. POOL PARTICIPANTS CONTRIBUTION • OCTA gives the County net $ 15 million annually for 15 years ($202 million total). OCTA receives in return Subordinated Claim (litigation proceeds layers 6 & 7). • Remaining $819 million of Settlement Secured Claims and Repayment claims become non-recourse to the County. - Payable only from litigation recoveries. - $819 million of SSC and Repayment Claims removed from the County's balance sheet. • Deficiencies of County Administered Accounts paid over 20 years without interest. • Arterial Highway Financing Program . REMOVES "CLOUD" OVER THE MUNICIPAL MARKET • Short-term debt of $800 million will be paid by June 30, 1996. • $ 15 million Debt Service Reserves for existing COPs will be replenished . • Vendor and employee claims will be paid by June 30, 2006 (estimated to be $65 million + $35 million). • County to fund the Plan of Adjustment with a long-term bond offering (estimated>$700 million). COUNTY CONTRIBUTIONS • Existing revenues - $10 million annually from Teeter. - $15 million annually for 20 years from Trash Importation. • County proposed revenues are used first to fund the Plan of Adjustment: - $4 million annually for 20 years from Harbor, Beaches & Parks. - $4 million annually for 20 years from Flood Control. - $4 million annually for 20 years from County Development Agency. - $105 million one-time contribution (assets sales, COP and Teeter financing). • Cash balances in County Administered Accounts due to Pool Participants are released. • Schools to receive $13.4 million of withheld property taxes. • Available Withheld Proceeds to be distributed as soon as possible. TREATMENT OF NON-SIGNING OPTION A PARTICIPANTS (AND OPTION B'S WHO ARE NOT BEING ASKED TO SIGN THE JOINT AGREEMENT) • Joint Agreement provides "No third party beneficiaries." • Joint Agreement not intended to waive claims against or adversely affect rights of any entity not party to it. • Non-signing Option A's will not get improved litigation proceeds. • Non-signing Option A's do not give up fully allowed secured and non-secured claims (CSDOC total of $94 million). • However, Trustee can act on an Option A & B participant's behalf as long as it's not inconsistent with "fair treatment. " J MPDOMGMSANDERM022196.RP1 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 28, 1996 Districts 5 and 6 Agenda Item (25): Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3, and Balboa Boulevard Sewer Replacement and Abandonment of 47th Street Pump Station Project, City of Newport Beach, Contract No. 5-37-3, authorizing an addition of$232,610.00 to the contract with Walton Construction Company for six items of additional work, and granting a time extension of 60 calendar days for completion of said additional work. Summary This $2.4 million project consists of replacing the old 30-inch sewer with a new Winch vitrified clay pipe (VCP) gravity sewer and appurtenances in Pacific Coast Highway from Bitter Point Pump Station to the Arches (Newport Boulevard) and modifications of connection City of Newport Beach sewers to Bayside Drive trunk sewer for County Sanitation Districts Nos. 5 and 6 . In addition, gravity sewers and appurtenances and abandonment of a pump station in Balboa Boulevard for the City of Newport Beach. The following is a summary of the contract amount: Original Contract Amount: $1,985,000.00 Previously Authorized Changes: $ 60,458.03 Amount of Change Order No. 2(Add)(Dedusl) $ 232,610.00 Amended Contract Price: $2,278,068.03 Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 2, for six Hems of added work for an addition of$232,610.00 to the contract with Wal-Con Construction Company. J:kW PDMBSwcssrreese125. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS oI ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA February 28, 1996 1p ELLI6 AVENUE 0o aa%et2> EpUNTAM VALLEY.CALWOMIA 1121269121 STAFF REPORT ma19523 11 Districts 5 and 6 PDC96-08: Approval of Change Order No. 2 to the Plans and Specifications to Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3, and Balboa Boulevard Sewer Replacement and Abandonment of 47th Street Pump Station Project, City of Newport Beach, Contract No. 5-37-3 Summary In September 1994, the Directors approved the plans and specifications for Contract No. 5-37-3, Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3 and Balboa Boulevard Sewer Main Replacement from 45th Street to West Coast Highway and Abandonment of 47th Street Pump Station Project, City of Newport Beach. The sewer is used to transport wastewater collected from the collection system of the Cities of Costa Mesa and Newport Beach to Treatment Plant No. 2. The $2.4 million project consists, in general, of replacing the old 30-inch sewer with a new 36-inch vitrified clay pipe (VCP)gravity sewer and appurtenances in Pacific Coast Highway from Bitter Point Pump Station to the Arches (Newport Boulevard), Contract No. 5-37-3 and modification of connecting City of Newport Beach sewers to Bayside Drive trunk sewer for County Sanitation District Nos. 5 and 6 (80% District No. 5; 20% District No. 6). In addition, gravity sewers and appurtenances and abandonment of a pump station in Balboa Boulevard for the City of Newport Beach. Change Order No. 2 is a net addition of$232,610.00 to the contract for six items of added work and a time extension of 60 calendar days. This project was designed by Boyle Engineering Corporation. The construction contract was awarded in October 1994 to Wal-Con Construction Company. Due to the state of affairs surrounding the bankruptcy and its related fiscal impact, the notice to proceed was extended to August 1, 1995. Item 1, in the amount of$32,082.00 and 7 calendar days time extension, is for the removal and reconnection of a 24-inch DIP valve and 24-inch bleed-off line that represented a conflict during construction. As-built drawings did not disclose this facility, and therefore was not depicted on the contract drawings. Item 2, in the amount of$131,577.00 and 32 calendar days time extension, is for the removal and disposal of undisclosed concrete encasement and rock encountered during the construction of the Bitterpoint Pump Station-Pacific Coast Highway crossing. Interfering rock, concrete encasements, and other unsuitable materials were not shown on the contract drawings. Item 3, in the amount of$7,569.00 and 3 calendar days time extension, is for a direct conflict with an undisclosed utility(2-inch gas line tail)that was not shown on the contract drawings, nor included on any as-built drawings. Item 4, in the amount of$20,931.00 and 6 calendar days time extension, is for the use of an alternative backfill material in lieu of specified materials. This decision was based on undisclosed and inferior sub-surface materials that were not indicated on the contract documents. Item 5, in the amount of$35,821.00 and 9 calendar days time extension, is for the removal and isolation of a 27-inch forcemain that was shown on the contract documents to be abandoned, but was determined to be in use during construction. PDC96-08 Page 2 February 1, 1996 Item 6, in the amount of$4,630.00 and 3 calendar days time extension, is for the removal and replacement of damaged asphalt concrete pavement outside the contract trench limits. Undisclosed sub-surface materials (e.g. boulders, etc.) removed during construction contributed to the damaged pavement sections. Items 1 and 5 are design omissions related to contract drawings that failed to correctly incorporate existing as-built information. Staff will proceed with attempt to recover some portion of the costs from the designer. Items 2, 3, 4, and 6 are for changes that would have been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase. The original contract amount for the project was$1,985,000.00. The amount of change orders to date is $293,068.03 representing a net increase of 14.76% over the original contract amount. The time delays on this Change Order are not due to the Contractor's actions, but due to changed conditions and undisclosed utilities. The liquidated damages are specified at $500.00 per day. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 2 for six items of additional work for an additional $232,610.00 and 60 calendar days time extension with Wal-Con Construction Company. BP:Idh:gc ENGWGRRPTSZR02-01.96 Page 1 of 6 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Wal-Con Construction Comoanv C.O. No.: Two (2) Date: February 28 1996 Job: Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3. and Balboa Boulevard Sewer Replacement and Abandonment of 47th Street Pump Station Project. City of Newport Beach, Contract No. 5-37-3 Consultant: Boyle Engineering Corporation Amount of this Change Order(Add)(Bedve!) $232,610.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor,the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 - REMOVE AND RECONNECT 24-INCH DIP VALVE AND 24-INCH BLEED OFF LINE The Contractor was directed to pothole and remove an interfering 24-inch DIP (Ductile Iron Pipe) bleed off line from an existing 36-inch force main to existing manhole at Section 9+34 and reconnect this line to a new 72-inch manhole at Station 9+18. During construction of the new manhole at Station 9+18 and the removal of an existing manhole at Station 9+34 a valve cover and bleed off line that tied into the existing manhole was found to be in direct conflict with the construction of the new City of Newport Beach 60-inch manhole located at the joint point of the existing 15-inch VCP (Vitrified Clay Pipe) and the new 30-inch VCP line, and the base for the new 72-inch manhole located at Station 9+18. This line was not reflected on the contract drawings. Costs for this item include labor, materials and equipment for the added work plus extended overhead for the additional time to accomplish the work. This item of work was accomplished by contractor force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. Reference: (FCO No. 1). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 32,082.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 7 Calendar Days ITEM 2 - REMOVAL OF UNDISCLOSED CONCRETE ENCASEMENT AND ROCK For the Bitterpoint Pump Station- Pacific Coast Highway crossing, the Contractor was directed to perform the following scope of work as part of this change order item: 1.) Remove concrete encasement around existing 30-inch gravity sewer line from joint at new manhole located at Station 9+18 to an existing manhole at Station 44+12 (Plan 401) 2.) Remove concrete encasement around an existing 12-inch PVC vent line from an existing manhole at Station 9+34 to a new 72-inch manhole at Station 9+17 and reconnect this line to the above new manhole 3.) Remove interfering rock around proposed new City of Newport Beach manhole and gravity sewer line located at the intersection of the bypass Page 2 of 6 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Wal-Con Construction Company C.O. No.: Two (2) Date: February 28, 1996 Job: Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3. and Balboa Boulevard Sewer Replacement and Abandonment of 47th Street Pump Station Proiect. City of Newport Beach, Contract No. 5-37-3 Consultant: Boyle Engineering Corporation ITEM 2 - (CONTINUED) 4.) Remove boulders, rip-rap, wood shoring and other unsuitable material during the construction of 36-inch VCP line from Station 9+18 to Station 44+12 (Plan 401 tie-in point) For all of the aforementioned scope, none of the interfering rock, debris, boulders or concrete encasements were shown on the contract drawings. The impact of the aforementioned undisclosed subgrade material severely affected the Contractor's productivity by altering the planned construction sequencing of work and forced the Contractor to change construction methods. All work for the Bitterpoint Pump Station - Pacific Coast Highway crossing was in close proximity, and due to the rock, concrete, etc., made the construction more labor intensive than planned, e.g., some functions had to be performed by hand. It should also be noted that the mobilization and demobilization time expended by the contract during each day of the subject crossing were extensive and at one time required 29- 8' x 10' to 8' x 20' steel plates to secure the trenches for public safety. Costs for this item include labor, materials and equipment for the added work plus extended overhead for the additional time to accomplish the work. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. Reference: (FCO Nos. 2 and 6) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $131,577.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 32 Calendar Days ITEM 3- UTILITY CONFLICT WITH 2-INCH GAS LINE TAIL The Contractor encountered a direct conflict with a 2-inch gas line and valve during the excavation and placement of shields for the installation of 36-inch VCP line. This utility obstruction was not shown on the contract drawings. To avoid the conflict during excavations, the Contractor was forced to alter his construction methods by using 8-foot shields versus 10-toot shields, and doing some work by hand versus using a breaker. Costs for this item include labor, materials and equipment for the added work plus extended overhead for the additional time to accomplish the work. This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. Reference (FCO No. 2A). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $7,569.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 3 Calendar Days Page 3 of 6 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Wal-Con Construction Company C.O. No.: Two (2) Date: February 28, 1996 Job: Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3. and Balboa Boulevard Sewer Replacement and Abandonment of 47th Street Pump Station Proiect. City of Newport Beach, Contract No. 5-37-3 Consultant: Boyle Engineering Corporation ITEM 4 - ALTERNATIVE BACKFILL MATERIAL FOR 364NCH TRENCH During the installation of 36-inch VCP (Vitrified Clay Pipe) line and the 24-inch bypass line between Stations 9+22 and 9+87, the Contractor encountered boulders, rocks, concrete encasement, lumber and other debris that impacted the stability of the trench side walls. This underground condition was not indicated on the contract documents. To prevent the trench side walls from caving into the trench, the Contractor was directed to use a 1 1/2 sack slurry mix in lieu of the specified backfill requirements. This decision expedited the completion of the Bitterpoint Pump Station crossing, stabilizing the trench walls by filling voids as the trench shields were moved, and minimized public impact. Costs for this item include labor, materials and equipment for the added work plus extended overhead for the additional time to accomplish the work. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10.6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. Reference: (FCO No. 3) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $20,931.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 6 Calendar Days ITEMS- REMOVAL OF ABANDONED 27-INCH FORCE MAIN AND ISOLATION OF TIE- IN POINT AT EXISTING 36-INCH LIVE FORCE MAIN During the start of 36-inch VOID mainline construction at a location of approximately 13-feet east of new manhole at Station 9+87, the Contractor encountered a 27-inch force main (cement mortar lined and mortar coated) crossing the trench that was shown on the contract plans to be abandoned and cut and plugged at both the south and north ends. When the Contractor proceeded to remove the line it was found to be live. It was determined that under a previous contract, the subject line was only plugged on the northside of Pacific Coast Highway, making it operational through the souhside at a point where this line tied into a live 36-inch forcemain (Contract Nos. 5-29 and 5-31). The Contractor was forced to locate valves and drain the line in order to property abandon the line. The Contractor incurred additional costs to seal and plug the line(via welded steel plate) and remove unsuitable material from the trench. Costs for this item include labor, materials and equipment for the added work plus extended overhead for the additional time to accomplish the work. This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. Reference: (FCO No. 4) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $35,821.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 9 Calendar Days Page 4 of 6 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 108"ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Wal-Con Construction Company C.O. No.: Two (2) Date: February 28, 1996 Job: Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3, and Balboa Boulevard Sewer Replacement and Abandonment of 47th Street Pump Station Proiect. City of Newport Beach Contract No. 5-37-3 Consultant: Bovle Engineering Corporation ITEM 6- REMOVE AND REPLACE ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT OUTSIDE OF CONTRACT TRENCH LIMITS During construction of facilities at the Bitterpoint Pump Station crossing, Contractor encountered numerous boulders which when removed during excavation caused cracking and settlements to occur outside the contract trench limits and cave-ins at the trench walls. As previously stated, these sub- surface conditions were not indicated in the contract documents. In addition, abandoned shoring timbers extending beyond the trench limits had to be removed. The Contractor was directed to remove and replace in kind the aforementioned damaged paving areas (base pave over width trench) between Stations 9+52 to 9+87. Costs for this item include labor, materials and equipment for the added work plus extended overhead for the additional time to accomplish the work. This item of work was accomplished by Contractors force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. Reference: (FCO No. 7) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $4,630.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 3 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $232.610.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER 60 Calendar Days Page 5 of 6 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728.8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Wal-Con Construction Company C.O. No.: Two (2) Date: February 28, 1996 Job: Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3. and Balboa Boulevard Sewer Replacement and Abandonment of 47th Street Pump Station Proiect. City of Newport Beach, Contract No. 5-37-3 Consultant: Boyle Engineering Corporation The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 60 days extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approve by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Onginal Contract Date:* August 1, 1995 Original Contract Time: 180 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: January 27, 1996 Time Extension this C.O.: 60 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 120 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 300 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: March 27, 1996 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable 'The original contract date was February 7, 1995. The "Notice to Proceed"was dated August 1, 1995 due to the bankruptcy. Original Contract Price $ 1,985,000.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 60,458.03 This Change (Add) (Bedue!) $ 232,610.00 Amended Contract Price $ 2,278,068.03 Page 6 of 6 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Wal-Con Construction Company C.O. No.: Two (2) Date: February 28, 1996 Job: Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3. and Balboa Boulevard Sewer Replacement and Abandonment of 47th Street Pump Station Project. City of Newport Beach, Contract No. 5-37-3 Consultant: Boyle Engineering Corporation Board Authorization Dale: February 28, 1996 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Submitted by: Re mended by: ngineitering Manager Dale C struction Manager Date prov d Ap roved as to Fonn: 1 it ctor of Engineering Date G ra ounsel Date Accepted by: WAGOINSTRUCTION COMPANY Contractor Date MID=YEAR REPORT December 31 , 199 0%Sl FtICT$ OF Oy9y F 2 i O () U D A9o�Cn'Y�HE ENV�PCN��� -County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California Table of Contents Section 1 - Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I Financial Report- Section 2 -Joint Operating &Working Capital Budget Review Chart of Joint Operating Costs Per Million Gallons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 s Charts on the Gallonage Charge by Department . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Divisional Contributions to Gallonage Charge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Summary of Expenses by Major Category . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Summary of Expenses by Line Item . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Summary of Revenues by Line Item . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Comparison of Expenses by Department . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Chart of Total Flows-Year-To-Date . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Chart of Staffing Trends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Section 3 - Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Review Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Graphs by Type and Funding Source . . . . . . . . 1 Summary of Joint Works Construction Requirement- Current Year . . . . . . . . . . 2 Summary of Joint Works Construction Requirement- Project Life . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Section 4 - Budget Review by District Summary Budget Reviews- All Districts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 District No. 1 Budget Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 District No. 2 Budget Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 .• District No. 3 Budget Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 District No. 5 Budget Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 District No. 6 Budget Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 District No. 7 Budget Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 District No. 11 Budget Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 District No. 13 Budget Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 District No. 14 Budget Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 r Section 5 - Self-Insurance Funds Budget Reviews Medical Fund Budget Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Public Liability Fund Budget Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Workers' Compensation Budget Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Operational Report- Section 6 -Activity Trends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 .e Section 7 - Project Tracking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 �II This page was intentionally left blank ICJ 4J I�I IUII (W II4.II1 IW u i u SECTION 1 . OVERVIEW J V 11 u J ; i u U J Overview Mid-Year Report - December 31, 1996 In the following sections are a compilation of reports that have in the past been presented separately to various committees and boards. This comprehensive report represents the Districts' first attempt to consolidate this information into one report that ' provides both the financial and operational accomplishments of the Districts' through the quarter ending December 31, 1995. The intent of this report is to provide the Directors, staff, and the general public with a comprehensive overview of the financial condition of the Districts, report on the status of all capital projects in progress, and outline the status of major projects and departmental activity trends. In the future, It is the goal of staff to prepare and distribute this report at the end of each quarter. A summary of the sections contained within this report is provided below. Joint Operating & Working Capital Budget Review: At the mid-year point, 44.25 percent or $24,060,000 of the 1995-96 net joint operating budget of$54,380,000 has been expended. Although net costs have increased 3.98 percent in comparison with the same period last year, the Districts' are still only at 48.26 percent of the target goal of$49,860,000. The total cost per million gallons (mg) rose to $555.87 from the prior quarter of$508,98, but is still $71.43 and $43.13 below the approved budget and target goals of$627.30 and $599.00, respectively, while the percentage change in flows decreased less than 1 percent. Some of the factors contributing to the $46.89 cost per mg increase over the first quarter include: • Environmental Monitoring increased 40.17 percent, or $17.14 cost per mg over the first quarter. This majority of this increase is primarily attributable to the timing of payments made for ocean monitoring since out of the $1.3 million costs incurred to date, only $268,000 was recognized in the first quarter. Although total environmental monitoring costs are $78,000 less than last year at this time, this line item is currently at 55.51 percent of the total budget and will have to be carefully monitored over the remainder of the year. • Although Repair Materials increased 22.99 percent, or $9.81 cost per mg over the first quarter, this line item is still at 49.63 percent of budget at mid- year. Staff will be challenged to keep this line item within the total $3,375,900 budget since an additional $500,000 of material relating to plant Section 1 - Page 1 Mid-Year Report L _ L automation computer maintenance has now been identified that had not previously been considered during the preparation of the budget. • Research increased 15.77 percent, or$6.73 cost per mg over the first quarter. The majority of this increase is related to the increase in payments made to Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Authority (SCCWRPA). Although, the Research line item is currently at 69.28 percent of total budget, staff believes that the costs booked-to-date reflect a greater portion of the total annual cost and that the year end total cost will approximate the budget of$565,000. u Other significant Joint Operating results as of December 31, 1995: • Salaries and Wages- Although total salary and wages are only at 45.49 V percent of budget at mid-year, an additional 41 staff members were added during the first two quarters that will contribute to the total compensation i paid out in the second half of the year. v • Retirement- At the mid-year point, retirement was slightly higher than salaries and wages at 48.80 percent. This higher percentage is reflective of $208,000 paid out for early retirement as well as the additional amounts paid for the third and final year payment for the rate increase resulting from the change in the Orange County Retirement Systems actuarial W assumptions. • Insurance- The Insurance line item was at $727,414, or 58.19 percent of budget, at mid-year. This overage is primarily due to the fact that the final insurance quotes were received after the budget was adopted. Staff is ,6 examining ways insurance costs can be reduced in 1996-97, including the possibility of obtaining excess insurance for general liability. Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Review: At December 31, 1995, total Capital Outlay Revolving Fund expenditures totaled $8,287,008, or 24.72 percent of budget. Total projected capital expenditures for 1995-96 has been revised from $33.5 million to $21 million due to the delay of several major projects such as the: -Primary Treatment Expansion of 72 mgd at Plant No. 1 -Primary Clarifier Rehabilitafion at Plant No. 1 -Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2 -Fire Protection and Water Systems Modifications at Plant No. 2 -Chemical and Plant Water Modifications at Plant No. 2 -Surge Tower Replacement at Plant No. 2. In addition, the new Warehouse Building at Plant No. 2 has been cancelled and the old Section 1 - Page 2 Overview Warehouse Building at Plant No. 2 will be remodeled instead. .. Budget Review by Districts: At mid-year, revenues of all Districts totaled $61,053,801, or 47.34 percent of budget. None of the $9,100,000 budgeted IRWD Fees have yet to be received due to the recently concluded negotiations on future contribution requirements. Likewise, only $5,883, or 0.91 percent of the Sale of Capacity Rights have been received because the majority of this revenue source is due in April of 1996 from the Santa Ana Watershed Protection Authority. However, Interest & Miscellaneous Receipts are at 73.90 percent of budget, or$11,675,734 because of both larger available cash balances and higher interest rate yields than was anticipated in the 1995-96 budget. Conversely, expenses and outlays of all Districts totaled $60,481,160, or 42% of budget ® at December 31, 1995 with no major deviations. Self-Insurance Funds Budget Reviews: The Districts' are self-insured for General e Liability, Workers' Compensation and Employee Dental Insurance and provide separate fund accounting for the revenue and expenses incurred in managing these liability claims. The revenues to these funds represent individual District contributions based on each District's share of Joint Works Operating Costs (sewage flows). Expenses to these funds include actual claims paid, claims administration, and excess loss policies. The Self-Insurance Fund revenues totaled $449,611, or 43.11 percent of budget at December 31 while total expense were $385,424, or 37.94 percent of budget. Operational Review: The Operational Review section of this report pertains to the status of Activity Trends and Project Tracking as of December 31, 1995. Activity Trends provides a comparison of current activity trends as compared to budget. Provided within this section are the key workload indicators of each Division that are constantly compared with pre-determined benchmarks and re-evaluated over time. Also included is an explanation of major variances or changes in the data. Project Tracking summarizes all major divisional projects which were included in the 1995-96 budget. This section identifies each major project and indicates the title, division responsible, the status of the project, and the start and end dates. The status of all projects is also provided in chart form and includes the following project descriptions: -Ahead -On Track -Done -Behind -Not Started -On Hold -Cancelled Section 1 - Page 3 L L L I u u L L I . 6w V This page was intentionally left blank L L L I t! V L V L Sa Von 1-Pope 4 L r r r r u SECTION 2. r JOINT OPERATING & WORKING CAPITAL BUDGET REVIEW r r u r r r u r r u r J.O. & W.C. Budget Review Joint Operating Costs Per Million Gallons f, For The Six Months Ended 12131/95 r � 4I r �pp ------------------.________________._________________.________________ Te�9et-599 r ktwyw r Adml-M r lEOD _________________r________________ _____________._________________ r m $450 1991-92 1992-93 1993.94 19" 19" t 12131 Cost/mg t6130 Cost/mg Section 2 -Page 1 i � Mid-Year Report _ w Gallonage Charges by Department For The Six Months Ended 12131195 E300.00 uso.00 V I � o= E200.00 L E1MM 8 E1ao.oa c V E50Dm W Eo.00 i i i i— i i a Actual AcdM AdW Actual AWeI Budget Target 95-96 Tid 199o-91 1991-92 IMM43 199390 196495 1995-96 1995.96 tTOW MaWMteace tTOW OMakm --.TOW Taclr 9eMOes V Wm ____________________ __________ __________ ____________________ _ I ' 0 ------------------- ---------- --------- ----- ~------------------- - $ oo ------------------- ---------- --------- --- ---- --------- 4 $30 ------------------- ---------- ------ ------------------- --------- SuaBo -- ---------- --------- ------- -•-------- ------ --- L �+ ----- ---------- ---------- --- - -------- L + -------------------- ---------- I maD 6r AraW Apual Actual ACtaal Actual Budget Target 9MVU 1990-91 1991-92 1992-93 199391 199445 199646 199596 — —Total Management — Total Mwnan Resources — —IrAel Finance tTata11Monnabon SwIrech tTaud Engarae" u Inl Seaton 2-Page 2 L J. O. & W. C. Budget Review Divisional Contributions to Gallonage Charge For The Six Months Ended 12131/95 - 199b91 1991-92 1992-93 1993.94 19B4-95 1995-96 1995.96 1995-96 c Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Budget Target Yr to Data Annual Flow In Million Gallons 08,048.38 82,936.n 64.99962 64]21.SO 88,489.60 seem 61 86.688.61 43.28461 2150 General Mana9ar 1202. 9.W 845 876 15" 8.91 833 11.10 e 2150 BoarO SeaeMry 0.34 212 a 77 0.63 a." 1.66 1.46 1.32 2170 McNgemaM SuppoR 1.0 3.70 2.69 283 247 0.63 0.43 1.05 2190 Communi®Wna Too 104 4a9 Total MBnegement 13M M96 11.90 10A2 19.07 Ism 1736 18.16 2100 Penannel&SIXVRy 5.48 13.25 a.W a.W 11V8 - - - 2510 HRAdmir3bot n - - - - - 3.45 3.45 4,49 25W HR&Too.no - - - - - ow 526 418 m 2530 So"B Emery Reeparue 7 05 6,51 6A5 Total Humen ltmour am 13M B.n 1199 11.78 16A2 1630 14M U10 011of Finance 7.57 to.W 13,79 16.0 17.07 1787 1aW 21.10 m 2220 Aomuncng 5.50 7.83 6.57 6.59 9.24 1203 11.35 11.37 22W Pulotarang&VFdreluxsln8 5.39 see 6,26 6.01 6.19 an all I'M Total Pool. IBM 25.D 2&81 29,45 32A8 28.67 =7 4017 ® 2240 InbnmBpn SeMces 6.20 10.13 11,79 13.W 14,15 - - - N1O Indo Teon Adromfin Ston - - - - - 3,07 107 3.04 242S H on SuppoR - - - - - 7.42 OV 6.98 24M SMMe.S,,1 741 am 1929 e ToalI IMerme9on ServRech 629 10.13 11.79 13.60 14.15 17.00 15.72 2992 3310 Director o10&M 1105 9,25 9.56 9,07 1224 Total DI,W 0&M 1108 BM am 9.n tz24 d 3310 Oirer4r of MalnlerlMxe - - - - 3.06 zoo 4.93 33M Mtoo SdonkrIing - - - - - 5.TJ 5.36 4.95 33W pond Mire 34.10 Sam 4221 3802 36.14 3TV 37.28 36.47 3340 Collect. 4.08 7.n 3,52 3.55 2,52 3.95 304 5,46 s 3350 Mechem®I Woo 55.40 59.80 Sam Sam 6710 63.64 WASS 3380 EI6croa1 1394 17.79 17.68 20,96 20,98 am am 17M W70 Ilu4umenMBon 14.88 loll 22.51 vm 29.17 N.32 am 25.09 e Total Manoterunce 117b7 t]929 146.71 148A9 1Q.18 17" 1117.13 14ti.63 N10 lir of Operations - - - - - 14.32 13.82 Ia8 ]3AIW Plan Opera50ns 10.42 182.7E 1Bzn 185.02 1117.98 N4.83 256.B6 212,01 ex Total Opera80ns lum 18z78 192n 18502 WAS M.15 MIS MW 3610 Dire Teo, v s 3.59 392 4.13 288 2.10 9.01 C55 L75 3520 Compeeoce 29.58 34.46 31.8E W.82 40.30 - Z530 Cons.Reol.Reuse 61.87 14.98 71.35 B8.28 MI03 _ m 3540 Air BualBy - 509 5.0 8.30 651 - - - 35W Soon. Innrel Mg" - W.n 5528 a.W 35W Laboratory 21.78 33.13 So'" 44.00 no 41.32 40.36 36.72 ry 35W Source Con" 9.01 1482 0,17 11.75 949 8.93 am am Total Teeh 9ard. 115.83 Isola 16926 166.11 10.16 11892 11097 IM75 3710 D1rof Ergr 145 4.54 0,72 055 On 1.45 1.0 4.02 3720 Planar,,Des18n(DeopC 9S967 501 789 2.84 118 3,16 2.81 1.10 BA 37M Enalore,Planning - - - - 0.63 - 1.71 Via Ivtr 60oneob 197 - - - - woo Gong Mprn 5,59 6So 2.68 3.51 304 4,17 3,43 3.91 r Total ErglneeRng 1104 2116 824 5.92 7.10 9.05 5.6Z 18.12 Total Espe. MTAO 582.49 572.83 678.74 676.73 871.14 84z96 01.70 Leas R.nues (21,91) (43,03) (N.51) (42,93) (52.54) (43.64) (43.64) (4$.02) Net JO Expe. 425.19 81B." &18.31 Mot 523AS 6n00 599.13 Smarr Section 2-Page 3 1� Mid-Year Report w Summary of Expenses by Major Category - For The Six Months Ended 12/31/95 V Exp. Exp. Incr. Incr. Percent Budget Thru Thru (Deer.) (Deer.) Budget Remaining ) 1995-96 12/31/95 12731/94 $ % Relized Budget W Net Salaries,Wages&Benefits 28,667,000 13,026,940 12,623,391 403,649 3.20% 45.44% 16,640,060 1 ' V Odor Control B Chemical Coagulants 5.363,500 1.812,837 1,951,573 (138,736) -7.11% 33.80% 3,55D.663 Contractual Services 7,269.500 3.531,591 3,404,082 127,509 3.75% 48.58% 3,737,909 Professional Services 1,512,600 660,649 743,233 (82,594) -11.11% 43.68% 851,951 I • Equipment Charges 235,700 93,687 111,089 (17402) -15.66% 39.75% 142.013 6d Repair 8 Maint.,Materials&Services 4,209,900 2,082,567 1,779,561 303,0D6 17.03% 49.47% 2,127,333 1 i.l Research 8 Mondonng 3.095,000 1.760,686 1,641,620 118.966 7.25% 56.88% 1,334.414 Utilities 3,375,500 1,166,349 1,314,321 (147,972) -11.26% 34.55% 2,209,151 Other Materials,Supplies 8 Outside Services 4,451,300 1,908,945 1,882,063 26,882 1.43% 42.899h 2,542,355 V Total Joint Operating Expenses 58,180,000 26,044,161 25,450.933 593,218 2.33% 44.76% 32,135,84E Revenues 8 Offsets (3,800,000) (1,983,142) (2,310,818) 327,374 -14.17% 52.20% (1,818,558) Net Joint Operating Expense 54,380,000 24,060.709 23,140,117 920.592 3.98% 44,25% 30,319,291 i Gallonage Flow(MG) 86.688.61 43,284.61 43.927.97 (643) -1.46% 49.93% 43,404 Ir Gallonage Flow(MGD) 236.85 235.24 238.74 (3.50) -1.46% 4rJ Gallonage Charge($'s/MG) 627.30 555.87 526.77 29.10 5.52% Lr I ' UJ V id V Section 2-Page 4 V F J. O. & W. C. Budget Review Summary of Expenses by Line Item For The Six Months Ended 12/31/95 o i EXP EXP EXP INCR INCR BUDGET THRU THRU REMAINING THRU (DECR) (DECR) Description 1995-96 12131195 12/31/95 BUDGET 12131194 $ % Salaries.Wages 8 Benefits Salaries 8 Wages 32,283,000 14.684.709 45.49 17,598,291 14,228,830 455,879 3.20 Employee Benefits: Retirement 3.077.000 1,501,482 48.80 1,575,518 1,054.920 446,562 42.33 Workers Comp 225,000 103,848 46.15 121.154 112,500 (8,654) (7.69) Unemployment Ins 75,000 12.944 17.26 62.056 17,746 (4,1102) (27.06) Group Insurance 4,207,000 1.798,939 42.76 2.408,061 1,810.973 (12.034) (0.86) Uniform Rental 100.000 28,625 28.83 71,175 35.015 (6.19D) (17.68) Total Benefits 7,684,D00 3,446,036 44.85 4,237,964 3.031,154 414,882 13.69 Salaries,Wages,8 Benefits 39,967,000 18,130,745 45.36 21,836,255 17.259.984 870,761 5.04 'a W.O.Salaries 8 Ben.Alloc. Direct Charges-Cori (6,875,000) (2,792,058) 40.61 (4,082,942) (2,956,878) 164.820 (5.57) Cost AIIoc-Corl/Dist (4,425,000) (2,311,747) 52.24 (2,113,253) (1,679.715) (632,032) 37.63 W.O.Salaries&Benefits (11,300,000) (5,103,805) 45.17 (6,196.195) (4,638,593) (467,212) 10.08 Net J.O. Payroll 28,667,000 13,026,940 45.44 15,640.060 12.623,391 403,549 320 Mad, Supply,8 Services Gasoline, Diesel 8 Oil 175,000 67.239 38.42 107,781 96,273 (29,034) (30.16) Insurance 1,250,000 727,414 58.19 522,586 674,111 53,303 7.91 Memberships 58,000 28,950 49.91 29.050 40.823 (11,873) (29.08) Office Exp-Supplies 203.100 60,457 20.77 142.643 58,278 2.179 3.74 Office Automation 157.500 95,157 61.05 61,343 40,188 55,969 139.27 Other 102.300 49,859 46.74 52,441 41.808 8,051 19.26 Operating Supplies e Odor Control 2,103,5D0 665,129 31.62 1,438.371 620.373 44,756 721 Sulfide Control 1.715,000 610.626 35.61 1,104,374 693,360 (82,734) (11.93) Chemical Coagulants 1.545,000 537,082 34.76 1,007.918 637,840 (100.755) (16.80) Lab Chemicals 8 Supplies 509,000 156,927 30.83 352,073 200.047 (43.120) (21.55) Tools 125,400 56,158 44.78 69242 43,376 12,782 29.47 Solv, Paints,8 Jan. Supplies 146,000 58,394 38.63 89,606 60.923 (4,529) (7.43) Other Operating Supplies 207,500 112,165 54.08 95,335 98.466 13.699 13.91 Contractual Services Groundskeeping 8 Janitorial 213,000 50,249 23.59 162,751 61,760 (11,511) (18.04) Outside Lab Services 150,000 24,753 16.50 125,247 29.625 (4,872) (16.45) Solids Removal 5,425,000 2,855.393 52.63 2,669,607 2,783,412 71.981 2.59 Other Waste Disposal 140,000 15,895 11.35 124,105 27.657 (11,762) (42.63) .. Oxygen Plant Oper 510,D00 235.338 46A4 274.662 224.344 10,994 4.90 Other 831.500 349,963 42.09 481,537 277,264 72,679 26.21 Section 2 -Page 6 L Mid-Year Report Summary of Expenses by Line Item r'l For The Six Months Ended 12/31/95 % Ld EXP EXP EXP INCR INCR BUDGET THRU THRU REMAINING THRU (DECR) (DECR) DESCRIPTION 191l 12131195 12/31195 BUDGET 12131184 S % Professional Services Legal 600.000 340,854 56.81 269,146 285.484 55,370 19.40 Audit&Accounting 70.000 27,618 39.45 42,382 65,853 (39,235) (58.69) Engineering 289.000 70,322 24.33 218,678 71,337 (1,015) (1.42) Lf Other 553,600 221,855 40.07 331,745 319,569 (97.704) (30.57) Printing&Publication Repro-ln-House 219,1D0 116,298 53.08 102,802 112,973 3.325 2.94 Prin8ng.Outsioe 60,500 14,353 23.72 46,147 9,548 4,805 50.32 Photo Processing 32,700 13,588 41.49 19,132 11,707 1,861 15.90 Notices&Ads 29,6W 20234 68.59 9,268 14,892 5,342 35.87 Rents&Lasses V Outside Equip Rental 109,000 46,804 42.94 62,196 44,683 2,121 4.75 District Equip Rental 126,700 46,883 37.00 79,817 66,406 (19,523) (29.40) L Repairs&Maintenance - Materials 3,375,900 1,675,374 49.63 1,700,526 1,498,373 177,001 11.81 Contracts 834,000 407,193 48.82 426,807 281,188 126.005 44.81 Research&Monitoring 4J Enviro Monitoring 2,375,000 1,318,477 55.51 1,056,523 1.396,880 (78.403) (5.61) Air Quality Monitoring 155,000 50,650 32.68 104,350 75,000 (24,350) (32.47) Research 565,000 391,459 6928 173,541 169,740 221.719 130.62 V Travel&Meetings 134,0D0 76,970 57.44 57,030 1OZ444 (25.474) (24.87) Training 513,500 103,389 20.13 410,111 - 103.389 10D.00 Uncollectable Accounts 15,000 171 1.14 14,829 - 171 1DD.00 Utilities W Diesel For Generators 25,000 0.00 25,000 5,964 (5,964) (100.00) Power 1.075,000 405,466 37.72 689,534 395,047 10419 2.64 Natural Gas 1,400,000 421,781 30.13 978,219 494.962 (73:181) (14.79) Lo Telephone 125.500 63.022 50.22 62,478 65,541 (2,619) (3.84) Water 750,000 276.080 36.81 473,920 352.807 (76.727) (21.75) .i Other Expenses w Freight 79,70D 25,518 32.02 54,182 28,536 (3,018) (10.58) General&Safety 539.000 164.185 30.46 374.815 204,100 (39,915) (19.5M Aqmd Operating Fees 250,OO1) 89.129 35.65 160,871 64,901 24,228 37.33 I , Prior Years Expense 20,000 - 0.00 20,000 162,360 (162,36D) 0.OD Iwl Other Non-Opel Expense 94,500 29,855 31.59 64,645 39,888 (10,033) (25.16) Net J.O.-Matis,Supp.&Sam. 29,983,000 13,173,656 43.94 16,809,344 13,051,121 122,535 0.94 L Cost AIIoc-Corf&Other (470.000) (156.445) 33.29 (313,555) (223.579) 67.134 (30.03) Net I.O:Maas,Supp, &Sam. 29,513.000 13,017,211 44.11 16,495,789 12,927,542 189,669 1.46 i Total J.0. Requirements 58,180,000 26,044,151 44.76 32,135,849 25,450,933 593,218 2.33 wd Less:: Revenue (3,810,000) (2,023.339) 53.11 (1,786,661) (2,320,884) 297.545 (12.82) Cost Allocation - CORF, Dists, &Other 10,000 39,897 398.97 (29.897) 10,068 29,829 29528 y j Net Revenue (3,800,000) (1,983,442) 52.20 (1,816.558) (2,310,816) 327.374 (14.17) Net J.O. Expenditures 54,380,000 24,060,709 44.25 30,319,291 23.M,117 92D,592 3.98 Section 2-Page 6 J. O. & W. C. Budget Review Summary of Revenues by Line Item For The Six Months Ended 12/31/95 .,. REV %REV REV INCR INCR BUDGET THRU THRU REMAINING THRU (DECR) (DECK) DESCRIPTION 1995416 12131195 12131195 BUDGET 12/31194 $ % INTER DIST SEWER USE 1.450,000 811,692 55.98 638,308 799,706 11,986 1.50 - WASTEHAULER 500,000 154,748 30.95 345,252 239,400 (84,652) (35.36) IRWD SLUDGE DISPOSAL 650,000 494,615 76.09 155.385 394,123 100,492 25.50 WASTE HAULER PENALTIES - - 0.00 - 0 (0) 0.00 -- SCRAP SALES 10,000 13,730 137.30 (3,730) 42,976 (29.246) (68.06) OTHER SALES 5,000 808 16.16 4.192 653 155 23.75 BIOSOLIDS REUSE 10,000 - 0.00 10,000 6,722 (6,722) (100.00) RENTS&LEASES 70,D00 73,201 104.57 (3,201) 1,250 71,951 100.00 INVESTMENTINTEREST - - 0.00 - - - 0.00 ar CONTRIBUTION IN AID - - 0.00 - - - 0.00 GENERAL NON-OPERATING 100,000 98.403 98.40 1,597 52.414 45,989 87.74 VEHICLE&EQUIP 200,000 92,379 46.19 107,621 $1.608 10,771 13.20 b MAILING FEE S,ODO 20 0.40 4,980 30 (10) (33.33) SAMPLING CHARGES 250,D00 119,063 47.63 130,937 127,932 (81869) (6.93) - - PRIOR YEAR INCOME 50,000 - 0.00 50,000 375,953 (375,953) (100.00) 0 POWER SALES 500,000 164,679 32.94 335,321 198.117 (33,438) (16.88) TOTALJO REVENUES 3,800.000 2,023,339 53.25 1,776,661 2,320.884 (297,545) (12.82) r ti es1 b.' d Section 2-Page 7 L Mid-Year Report Comparisons of Expenses by Department For The Six Months Ended 12/31/95 199 1993-94 1994-95 1994-95 Adopted Year too Date Budget% 4 Deparbnent and Division Actual Budget Actual Budget 12131/95 Realized General Managers Department Executive Management 569,751 1,D09,300 1.410,640 763,700 480,595 62.93% yrj Board Secretary 70,207 208.000 58,660 143,600 57,178 39.82% Management Support - - - 54,700 45,432 83.06% Communications 238,956 441,600 218,598 676.400 202,873 29.99% Total 878,924 1,658,900 1,687,798 1.1338,400 786,678 47.98% Human Resources Department Human Resources Administration 758,055 1,126.500 1,042.149 299,000 194175 64.94% Human Resources 8 Training - - - 512,800 185:432 36.16% Safety 8 Emergency Response 611.200 235,754 38.57% Total 758,055 1,126.500 1,042,149 1,423,000 615,361 43.24% Finance Department 4 Finance Administration 1.420,950 1,413.800 1,510,739 1,549,000 913,116 68.95% Accounting 555,449 815,600 817,506 1.042,800 492,085 47.19% Purchasing 8 Warehousing 506,788 647,400 546,640 760,500 342,215 45.00% Total 2,483,187 2,876,8D0 2,874,885 3.352,300 1,747,416 52.13% Information Technology Department Info Tech Administration 1,146,921 1,699,300 1,251jill 266,100 131,622 49.46% Hardware Support - - - 643,250 302,307 47.00% Software 8 Plant Automation Support 642,250 860,954 134.05% Total 1.146,921 1,699.300 1,251.701 1,551,600 1,294.884 83.45% Maintenance Department Maintenance Administration 932,102 1,107,100 1,083,020 265,000 212,060 80.02% Maintenance Scheduling - - - 496,400 214,247 43.16% Plant Maintenance 3.290,595 3,458,100 3,197,821 3,261,300 1,578,665 48.41% 'I Collection Facilities Maintenance 299,426 365.900 249,469 342,300 236,224 69.01% Ly Mechanical Maintenance 4.898,622 5.574.700 5.192,640 5,816.600 2,202,360 37.86% Electrical Maintenance 1.767,675 1,902,300 1,856,601 1,964,000 774,128 39.42% Instrumentation Maintenance 2,346,636 2,713,800 2,581,127 2,975,100 1,086,045 36.50% Total 13.435.056 15,121.900 14.160.678 15.120,700 6,303.729 41.69% 64 Operations Department l Operations Administration - - - 1,241,700 628621 50.63% 1 Plant Operations 15,601.211 15,840.800 14,862,879 22,957,600 9,176:778 39.97% Total 15,601,211 15,840,800 14.862,879 24,199,300 9,605,399 40.52% Technical Services Department Technical Services Administration 243,052 266,200 193,053 833,100 292,372 35.09% Environmental Management 9,057,047 10,533,300 10,163,150 4.921,400 2,592,949 52.89% Environmental Sciences Lab 3.715,233 3,471,950 3.241.725 3,581,6D0 1,546,131 43.17% 1 Source Control 991,029 276,750 839.942 773,700 276,613 35.62% ✓j Total 14,006.361 14,538,200 14,437,870 10,109,8D0 4,707,065 46.56% Engineering Department Engineering Administration 46,212 56,000 78,229 125.400 173,900 138.68% yj Design Engineering 148,366 221,000 281,346 243,800 367,482 150.73% Engineering Planning - - - 54,20D 73,811 136.18% Construction Management 296,125 102,6D0 266,966 361,50D 169,026 46.76% Total 490,703 379,600 628,531 784,900 794.218 99.91% L Less Joint Operating Revenues (3.620,154) (3,700,000) (4,649,515) (3,800,000) _ (1,983,442) 52.20% Net Joint Operating Expenses 45,180,264 49,542,OOD 46.296.976 54,380.000 24,D60,709 44.25% Section 2-Page 8 u J.O. & W.C. Budget Review Total Flows - Year-To-Date ® For The Six Months Ended 12/31195 45.000 4a.000 -----------------`-------------- --------- ---- --- 49.000 - -- - --- - -- -- — -------------- ------ ---------" ---- 0 A ra � O 42,000 _ _ __ _________ __.__ ___________._________________ ® 41.000 _ _____________ ________________-____ 4"0a Ds0e1 DIDi2 D0043 Dace4 0ee45 Sk Months Ended Section 2-Pape 9 Mid-Year Report u V Staffing Trends For The Six Months Ended 12131/95 I 710 690 i 670 -------------------- m O W y 0 E630 _____________________________________4__________________4_ t_________________ L L Ir 590 r L 570 6130/92 6rM3 N.1m 613M 12131M iw t Authorized --m-AchW L M� u i L id w ftWon Y-Pays 10 j . L.f LI SECTION 3. Lj CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND REVIEW i.l u U iJ J U J u CORF Review F Capital Improvement Program For The Six Months Ended 12131195 '9 Plant 1 $3,513,DOD Plan12 43% $1.632.000 19% Wake,itadamstion $104.00D 1% const.in Progress W'DOD Interplant 6 Joint FacilitiesEquipment 70,000 $933,000 Special Projo= $2,0 11% &studies 25% $91,000 1% Total Capital Improvement Expenditures -$8,287,000 District No.2 Distnd No. 3 414S,,,Ind 00 $2,524,000 ® 30 d6% Mani No, 1 $810.D00 9.83.°6District No.5 - - $298,000 3.61% D No.6 $523,000 Distnd No. 53 District No 11 District No. 7 5394,000 6.31% $80,000 $519,000 $687,000 4.69% `g 0.96 6.32% 8.39% Total Capital Improvement Funding - $8,287,000 Section 3-Page 1 Mid-Year Report L 1 Summary of Joint Works Construction Requirement - Current Year W For The Six Months Ended 12/31/95 1995-96 6t30196 b 1995.96 Actual Remaining Projected Budget 012131195 Budget Cost A.Reclamation Plant 1 New and Rebudgeted Major Projects: r. 1. Electrification of Pump Drives, P1-36-1 50,000 408,825 (358,825) 504,846 2. Secondary Treatment Expansion to 80 MGD, P1-36-2 6,335,000 2,302,653 4,032,347 9,262,695 Value Engineering for Secondary Treatment, Pt-36-2 165,000 4,821 160,179 - 3. Primary Treatment 72 MGD Expansion, P1-37 164,626 1,832 162,794 261,735 Compressed Natural Gas Refueling Station, P1-51 835,374 3,178 832,196 - 4. Security& Landscaping, P1-38-1 10,000 59,909 (49,909) 94,617 5. Misc. Mods. Priority Elements P1-38-2 10.000 208,920 (198,920) 280,780 y 6. Misc. Modifications to Plant 1, Pt-384 50,000 268,967 (218,967) 477,724 7. Fire Protection, Signs and Water Sys Mods., Pt-38-5 900,000 17,345 882,655 594,815 8. Electl. Facility Modifrts&Safety Upgrades,P1-40-1 - 2,450 (2,450) 24,907 W 9. Fac Modifns &Safety Upgrades, P140-2 500,000 17,565 482,435 40,926 10. Prim Clarifiers 3A&5 Rehab. P141 1,000,000 45,744 954,256 431,379 ( 11. Seimic Retrofit of Non-Structure Systems, PI-43 - - - _ 16,000 12. Seismic Retrofit Structual Items, P144-1,2,3 100,000 31,675 68,325 100,179 13. Chemical and Wastehauler Facility Modifns, P146-2,3 - 7,980 (7,980) 107,980 14. 12KV Distribution System for Support Facilities, P147 400,000 11,378 388,622 38,665 1d 15. Misc Architectural&Treatment Pit Imprvmts, P148 396,938 10.363 386,575 20,155 Information Technologies Trailer Conplex, P148-1 3,082 3,062 - - 23. Miscellaneous Special Projects Plnt 1, P149 50,000 - 50,000 - 24. Misc. Job Plan Projects (See Schedule C) 500,000 105,792 394,208 190,541 6d Sub-Total -Reclamation Plant 1 11,470,000 3,512,469 7,957,541 12,447,844 B.Plant 2 New and Rebudgeted Major Projects: ) 1. Support Facilities and Site Improvements Ir'r a. Operations Building, P2-23-5-1 350,000 70,322 279,678 353,357 b.Warehouse Building, P2-35-2 1,400,000 25.865 1,374135 - c. Maintenance Building , P2-35-3 1,400.000 43.130 1,356:870 534.758 e. Construction Management Office, M-044(P2-354) 250.000 35,313 214,687 264,795 2. Rehab 7 Digesters, P2-39-1,2,3 250,000 29,372 220,628 114,545 3. Primary Treatment 24 MGD Expansion, P241 - 787 (787) - v 4. Secondary Treatment Expansion, P242-2 1.400,000 957.468 442.532 1.347,531 5. Priority Misc. Mod. , P243-1 50,000 45,834 4,166 228,069 6. Misc. Modifications , P243-3 10,000 75,3T7 (65377) 108,733 I 7. Plant 2 Influent Diversion 200,000 - 200:000 90,000 V 8. Fire Protection, Signs&Water Sys Modifns, P246 1,900,000 19,402 1.880.598 591.707 9. Electl Fac Modifns&Safety Upgrades, P247-1 - 6,419 (6,419) 28,969 1 10. Fac Modifns&Safety Upgrades, P247-2 600,000 27,896 472104 53.875 jW 11. Primary Clarifier Rehab. P248 500,000 32,845 467:165 256,875 12.Seimic Retrofit of Non-Structure Systems, P2-50 - 3,520 (3,520) 321,000 13. Seismic Retrofit, Structural Items P2-53-2,3,4,5,6 50,000 58,464 (8,464) 133,000 ! 14. Chemical and Plant Water Modifns, P2-55 1,400,000 33,274 1,366,726 378,528 V 15. Misc Seismic Modifns&Flare Improvements, P2-56 250,000 1,403 248.597 3,403 16. Miscellaneous Projects Special Projects Plant 2 50,000 - 50,000 - I 20. Reclaimed Water System Pint. 2 75,000 - 75,000 12,000 y 21. Misc. Job Plan Projects (See Schedule D) 500,000 65,529 434,471 176,412 Sub-Total-Treatment Plant 10,535,000 1,532,220 9,002,780 4,997,657 I U Section 3- Page 2 L CORF Review ® Summary of Joint Works Construction Requirement - Current Year - For The Six Months Ended 12/31/95 1995-96 6130196 1995-96 Actual Remaining Projected Budget Br 1213'1195 Budget Cost C.Water Reclamation Regional Expansion 52,086 - 52,088 - Reclmation Plant No. 1 Water Quality Management Study 153 153 - 163 OCSD/OCWD Regional Water Reclamation Plant Study 47,761 103,683 (65,922) 59,761 Sub-Total -Water Reclamation Regional Expansion 100,000 103,836 (3,836) 59,914 D. Interplant and Joint Facilities 1, Support Facilities and Site Improvements a. Demolition of Old Lab for Offices, J-11-1 200,000 2.813 197,187 202,000 b. Central Lab Expansion J-17-3 90,233 67 90.166 12,000 Purch &Instl of Racks to Secure Gas Cylinders& Dewar 27,467 1,263 26,204 - Office Reconfigurated for Enviom Mgmt Area 42,300 - 42,300 - 2. Outfall & Booster Pump Stations a. Surge Tower Replacement, J-34-1 1.185,000 4,574 1.180,426 262,000 3. Computerized Fac. Records and Dwg. Sys. J-25-1 419,900 76,314 343,586 36,561 New Safety Division Offices,J-41-1 80,100 825 79,275 4. Electi. Power Systems Rehab. Studies J-25-2,3&4 200.000 53,764 146,236 121,171 5. Plants 1&2 Monitor/Control Sys, J-31-1,2,3,4,5 1,736.535 1,050,457 686,078 496,471 SCADA Retrofit Hardware Platform at Phs 1 &2 137,865 137,865 - 49.648 Power Bldg#1 Air Conditioning & Modifn for J-31 25,600 - 25,600 - 6. Standby Power Reliability Modifns, J-33-1,2 1,050,000 166.447 884,563 112.532 8. Biosolids Disposal Projects b. Land Acquisition - 194,619 (194,619) 14,708 9- District Information Management Network - - - 325,000 - - a. Maint. &Oper Mgmnt Computer System 75,000 - 76,000 - b. Lab Information Management System Upgrades 16,893 - 16,893 - c. Financial Information System 600,000 55.706 644,294 - d. Network System Integration 297,300 1,429 295,871 679 - Network Integration Consulting 42,700 2,436 40,264 - e. CD-Opficel Data Archiving 50,000 50,000 10. In-Plant Sampling System Modifn 69,740 - 69,740 21,000 Final Sampler System Upgrades 30,260 13,487 16,773 567 11. Improvements to Central Generation 257,800 - 267,800 - Boiler Chemical Dosing System 2,800 3.489 (689) - __ Piping Insulation Addition 4,800 332 4,468 - Steam System Modifn 34,600 - 34,600 - m 12. Cable Tray Improvements 100,000 - 100.000 - 13. Misc Job Plan Projects (See Schedule E) 500,000 305.336 194,664 177,517 -- Transfer from D. Items 10 a&b Projects Above 133,107 - 133.107 - Sub-Total -Interplant&Joint 7,410,000 2,070,223 5,339,777 1,831,854 Sub-Total -Major Projects 29,515,000 7,218,738 22,296,262 19,337,169 r Section 3-Page 3 L Mid-Year Report Summary of Joint Works Construction Requirement - Current Year - L For The Six Months Ended 12/31195 1995-96 6130196 L 1995-96 Actual Remaining Projected Budget (d 12131/95 Budget Cost E.Special Projects, Studies& Research 1. Master Planning Issues a. Pers/Admin. Support Fac @ Pit 1 J-26,J-30 71,984 56 71,928 210,058 L Districts' Office Space Utilization Study, J-38-1 3,016 3,016 - - b. Peak Hydraulic Discharge/Outfall Studies 377,793 - 377,793 153.000 Determination of Peak Hydraulic Discharge 22.207 22.207 - - 1 c. Coll, Trtmnt&Disp Fac. Strategic Study 200,000 - 200,000 - 61 d. NPDES Permit Support 100,000 35.351 64.649 273 2. Air Quality Control Program - - - 165,000 a.Toxics and ROG Control: Biotrickling filter R& D 90,000 29,874 60,126 24,850 V b.Air Emissions: Source Control Feasibility Study/Metal 25,000 - 25,000 - d. Biofiiter for Pump Stations 25,000 - 25,000 - e. A.Q. Database Development 25,000 - 25,000 f. Central Gen Parameter Monitoring 75,000 75,000 Sub-Total -Special Projects 1,015,000 90,504 924,496 553,179 ' V F. Equipment Items 3.000,000 933,214 2.066,786 1,171,178 Sub-Total -Joint Works Capital Requirements 33,530,000 8,242,456 25,287.544 - N Construction In Progress Completed at 6/30195 44.552 (44.552) Total Joint Works Capital Requirements 33,530,000 8,287,008 25,242,992 21,061,526 6r1 L L I V I U I ; L u Section 3 -Page 4 L' CORF Review Summary of Joint Works Construction Requirement - Project Life For The Six Months Ended 12/31/95 d Curren Total Total 6130195 Year Projected Estimated Esumated Accumulated Projected coat at Future Cost Cost Cost 6MI95 Cost A.Reclamation Plant 1 New and Rebudgeted Major Projects: 1.ElecVlfiation of Pump Drives, P1-3&1 1,700,000 1.066,911 504,846 1,475,736 224.264 2.Secondary Treatment Expansion to 80 MGD,P7-36-2 46.835.000 118.137 9,262.695 2,420,79D 4.414,210 Value Engineering for Secondary Treatment.P1-3&2 165.000 - - 4,821 160,179 3.Primary Treatment 72 MGD Expansion,Pt-37 36,125,000 166,613 261,735 1611,445 37,956,555 Compressed Nalurel Gas Refueling Station,P731 835,374 - - 3,178 832,196 4.security 8 Landscaping,Pt-38-1 1,510,000 1.573,145 94.617 1,633,054 (123,054) `m 5.Misc.Mods.Priority Elements Pi-38.2 4,810,000 5,007,980 280,780 5,216.900 (406.900) _ 6.Misc.Modifications to Plant 1,Pt-38.4 2.560,000 1.927.039 477.724 2,196,006 353.994 7.Fire Protection,Signs and Water Sys Mode.,Pt-3&5 3.060,000 463.663 584,815 481,008 2,578.992 B.Elect.Faulfty Measles 8 Safety Upgredes,P140-1 8.625.000 133,378 24,907 135.828 8,469,172 9.Fee Modilns B Safety Upgrades,P140-2 2.025.000 288,370 40,926 305.935 1,719,065 10.Plim Clan8ers 3,485 Rehab. P141 2,350,000 251,454 431,379 297,198 2,052,802 11.Selmic Retrofit of Non Structure Systems,P143 4,250,00D 117,194 16.000 117,194 4,132,81D6 4° 12.Seismic Retrofit Structual Items,P144-1,2,3 4.250,000 922,135 100,179 953,810 3.296,190 13.Chemical and Wastehauler Facility Moddne,P146-2,3 3.020.000 401,018 107,980 408,998 2,611,002 14. 12KV Distribution System for Support Facilities,PI47 2.650.000 141,956 38,565 153,334 2.496,665 15.Misc Arcndedural 8 Tmatment Pit lmprvmis.P148 835,000 107,345 20,155 117,708 717.292 m information Technologies Trailer Conplex,P146-1 400,W) - - 3,062 396,938 16.40 MGD Oxygen Activated Sludge B DAF'S 65,463,000 - - - 65,463,00D 17.Belt Presses(4 Units) 14.300,000 - - - 14,300,WD 1S.Solids Storage(4 Bins) 10.177,000 - - - 10,177,000 19,Digesters: 2 @ 1 10'Diameter 9,100,000 - - 9.100,000 20. 12kv Electrical Power DtsNbutkn 2.477,000 - - - 2.477,WD 21.Emergency Sewage Bypass System 1,922,000 - - - 1,922,00D 22.Remove Trickling Fitters 1 8 3 1,300.000 - - - 1,300,001) 23.Miscellaneous Specal Projects PInL 1, P149 4,385,000 - - - 4,385.000 24.Miac.Job Plan Project/ (See Schedule C) 22,125,000 66.054 190,541 171,946 21,953,154 25.Other Master Plan Projects a. Headwoncs No. 1 Rebuild,2W3 14,950,0g0 - - 14,950,000 It.Headworks No.2 Impeller/Pump Speed 2016 2.600,000 - - - 2.600,000 c.Remove Trickling Fillers 2 8 4.2007 1.300,000 - - - 1.300,000 &40 Mgd Oxygen Acrd Sludge BDAF,2017 34,000,000 - - - 34,000,000 e. 1 10'8 Digesters,2003 8 2012 1Q2W,000 - - - 18,200,000 rfl f.4 Belt Presses,20D4 10,920,000 - - 10,920,000 g. 12 KV Power Distribution,2001-2012 1,099.000 - - - 1.099,000 h. Standby Power Generation,200562015 4,914.000 - - - 4,91Q000 m t 72 Mga Primary Treatment,200482012 32,500,WD 32,600,000 Sub-Total -Reclamation Plant 1 379,727.374 12.752,392 12,447,841 16,264.851 363,462,523 B.Plant 2 New and Re audgeted Major Projects: 1.Support Facilities and She Improvements a.Operations Buiking,P2-23-5-1 3.650.000 3.398,576 353,357 3.468.898 81.102 _ b.Warehouse Building,P2-35.2 3.820,000 308,582 - 334.447 3.485.553 c.Maintenance Building,P2-35-3 1,01100,e00 263,064 534,758 306.194 3,693,806 ,a d. Phase II Site 8 Security Imp.,P2-35-6 2.475,000 176,309 - 176,309 2298,691 e.Construction Management Office,M-044(P2.3&4) 690.000 277,094 264,795 312.407 377.593 2,Rehab 7 Dgesters,P2-394,2,3 14,225,000 529,657 114,545 559,029 13,665,971 3,Primary Treatment 24 MGD Expansion,P241 14,605,000 4.549 - 5,336 14,499,664 m 4.Secondary Treatment Expansion,P242-2 18,1100,0110 16,277.999 1.347,631 17,235,467 764.533 5.Priority Misc.Moo. ,P243-1 4,850,001) 5.011,628 228,059 5,057,462 (207,462) - - 6.Misc.Modlfiations,P243-3 2,610.000 2,640,666 108,733 2,716,073 (206,073) 7. Plant 2 Influent Diversion 2.500,000 - 90.000 - 2.5W,000 Section 3-Page 6 1i Mid-Year Report Summary of Joint Works Construction Requirement- Project Life u For The Six Months Ended 12/31/95 Current Total Total 6130196 Year Projected Estimated tA� Estimaled Accumulated Projected Costat Future Cost cost Cost V30M Cost B.Plant 2 New and Rebudgeted Major Projects(cons): LI 8.Fire Protection.Signs 8 Water Sys Modi rs,P246 4.615,000 4d0.101 591,707 459.503 4.155,497 9. Elec i Fee MaBrw 8 Safety Upgrades,P247-1 ]45g000 113,362 26,969 119,781 3.330.219 10.Fee Maims B Safety Upgrades,P2.47-2 4.015,000 290,452 53,875 318.348 3.696,652 i 11.Primary Clarifier Rehab. P248 6,800,000 474.753 256,875 507.598 6.292,402 yl' 12.Sound Retrofit of Non-Slructuro Systems,P2-50 4,800,000 165,811 321,000 169,331 4,630,669 13.Seismic Retrofit,Structural Items P2.53.2,3,4,5,6 8,410,000 3,262,714 133,000 3.321,178 5,083,822 14.Chemical and Plant Water Modima,P2-S5 4.200.000 335,527 378.528 3611801 3,831,199 ) 15.Mile Seismic Modifns 8 Flare Improvements,P2-56 525,0D0 19,648 3,403 21,051 503949 V 16.Miscellaneous Projects Spectal Projects Plant 2 4,650,000 - - - 4,550,000 17.Solids Storage: 2 Bins 5.200,000 - - - 5.200,000 18.Additional 105 Foot Digester 3.900,000 - - - 3,900,001) 19.Plant Water Pump Station 1.170,000 - - - 1,170,000 20.RaGebned Water System Pint 2 4,820,000 - 12,01D0 - 4,82Q000 21.Misc.Job Plan Projects (See Schedule D) 22=,000 103.950 176,412 169,479 22,080.521 22.Other Master Plan Projects a.Replace Primary Basins A,B,C,2006 11,700,000 - - - 11.700,000 b.Standby Power Generation,200582015 10,000,000 - - 10,000,000 c.Monitoring and Control System,2005 520,000 520,DD0 Sub-Total-Troatrnent Plant 172,050,000 34,094.472 4.997,557 35,626,692 136423,308 V C.Water Reclamation Regional Expansion 74.820,000 - - - 74,820,000 Reclamxticn Plant No. 1 Water Quality Mngt.Study 280.000 1.540 153 1,693 271,307 OCSD/OCWD Water Reclamation Plant Study 400,000 148,637 59,761 252,520 147,480 Sub-Total-Water Reclm.Regional Expansion 75,5D0,DD0 150.377 59,914 254.213 75,245,787 D.Interplant and Joint Facilities ; t 1.Support Facilities and Site Improvements L; a.Demolition of Old Lab for Offices.J-11-1 230.000 27,858 202,000 30.671 199,329 b.Central Lab Expansion J-17-3 840,233 - 12,000 67 840,166 Porch B lnsti of Racks for Gas Cylinders B Dewars 27,467 15,749 - 17.012 10,455 Office Recordguraled for Enviom Mgmt Area 42,300 - - - 42,300 4 c.Demolition or Reuse of Old Conbol Center 245,000 - - - 245,000 d.Demolition of Support Bldg.@Pt2,J-27 190,000 109,504 - 109,504 80.498 2.Oulfall 8 Booster Pump Stations a.Surge Tower Replacement,J-34-1 6,500,000 768,699 262,000 773.273 5.726,727 L b.Outfall Reliability 8 Pumping Annex OOBS'C'J-34 31,085,000 - - - 31,086,000 c.Ext 8 Rod 78Yo Deep Water w/l27 Outiall 92,050.000 - - - 92,050,000 - 3.Computerized Fee.Records and Dw9.Sys.J.25-1 4,710,000 2D9,406 36.561 285,720 4,424,280 Transfer to Project Below New Safety Division Offices,J41-1 80,100 - - 825 79.275 Power 4.Maud.Per Systems Rehab.Stages J-25-2,364 I=,000 14,961 121.171 68,725 1,155,2.75 5.Plants 182 Monflor/Control Sys, J31-1,2,3,4,5 8.824.400 2,127.616 496,471 3,178,073 6,646,327 SCADA Retrofit Hardware Platform at Plls 1 8 2 2,200,000 423,684 49,648 681,549 1,638,451 Power Bldg a 1 Alr Conditioning B Maifn for J-31 26,600 - - 25.600 6.Standby Power Reliability Mod4ns,J33-1,2 14.575,000 445.593 112,532 611,040 13,963,960 nt Trunk ) 7.Bushard hderpla Replacement 31,000,000 - - 31,000,000 B.Biosolids Disposal Projects 1� a.Compost Demonstration Plant 9,000,000 - - - 9,000,000 In.Land Acquisition 22,000,000 - 14,708 194.619 21,B06381 c.Landfill Development Phase I 28,600,DDD - - - 28,600.000 d.Compost Facility 50,000,000 - - - 50,0110,000 e.Biosolids Died.Landfill Phase 112011 15,800,0%) - - - 15,600,000 Section 3 -Page 6 L CORF Review Summary of Joint Works Construction Requirement- Project Life For The Six Months Ended 12/31/95 Current Total w Total 6130/95 Year Projected Estimated ESOmated Accumulated Projected Cost at Future Cost Cost Cost 6130196 Cost D.Interplant and Joint Facilities(cont) I,Biosolids Do,Equip Phase I&112001 11,500,000 - - - 11,500,000 9. Elearical Power Distribution, 12W 2,707,000 - - - 2,707,000 9..District Information Management Network - 325.000 - 'd a.Maint 80per Mgmnt Computer System 1,050.CD0 89S593 - 896,593 163.407 b.lab Information Management System Upgrades 505.000 47,773 - 47.773 457,227 Transfer to 0. Item 13(Schedule E) c.Financial Information System 970.000 209,073 - 264.779 705,221 m d.Network System Integration 920.000 1.786 679 3.215 816.785 Network Integration Consulting 42.700 - - 2,436 40,284 e.CD-Opllml Data Archiving 125,000 - - 125,000 ..e 10.In Plant Sampling System Modffn 189.740 - 21.000 - 189.740 Final Sampler System Upgrades 30.260 447 567 13.934 16.326 11. Improvements to Central Generation 607,800 - - - 607,800 Beier Chemical Dosing System 2.800 - - 3.489 (659) ,y Piping Insulation Addition 4,800 - - 332 4,468 Steam System Modim 34,600 - - - 34,600 12,Cable Tray Improvements 2,400,000 - - - 2,400,000 13.Mbc Job Plan Projects (See Schedule E) 16,525,D00 313,520 177,517 818,a56 15,906,144 d Sub-Total-Interplant a Joint 356,564,800 5,612,262 1,831,854 7.682.485 348.8B2,315 Sub-Total-Major Projects 983,542,174 52,609.503 19.337.169 59.828,241 924,013.933 E.Special Projects,Studies 8 Research m 1.Master Planning Issues a.Pens/Admin.Support Fac @ Pit 1 J-26,J-30 298,000 274,935 210,056 274,991 23,009 Transfer to Project Below Didnota ORce Space Utilaabon Study,J-38-1 201,480 - - 3,016 198.464 d b.Peak Hydraulic D scharge/Outfall Studies 2,850,000 - 153.000 - 2.850,000 - Transfer to Project Below (1,151,000) - - - (1,151,000) Determination of Peak Hydraulic Discharge 1.151,000 - - 22.207 t 128,793 c Coil.Tdmnl B Dbp Faa Strategic Study 4.225.000 - - - 4,225,000 w d. NPDES Permit Support 1,175,000 427.445 273 462.796 712,204 2.Air Quality Contort Program - - 165,000 - a.Tosip and ROG Control:BiotdrJding filter R a D 440,000 304,697 24.850 334.571 105,429 m b.Air Embsiuns:Source Control Feasibility Study/Medal 75,000 - - - 75,000 c.Air Oualiry,Management Implementation Plan 150,000 21,640 - 21,640 128,360 d.Bial fter for Pump Stations 50,000 - - - 50.000 e.A.G.Database Development 75.000 - - - 75.000 ro I.Central Gen Parameter Monftonng 350,000 3.519 3.519 346.481 Sub-Tolil-Special Projects 9,889,480 1.032,236 553,179 1,122,740 8,766,740 F.Equipment Items 52.725,000 1.666.785 1,171.178 2,599.999 50.125,001 v Sub-Total-Joint Works Capital Requirements 1,046,456.654 55,308,524 63,55D,980 982,905,674 Construction In Progress Completed at 6130195 95,017,660 96.062.212 (95.062,2121 r, Total Joint Works Capital Requirements 1.046,456,654 150.326,164 21,061,526 158,613.192 887,843.462 Section 3 -Page 7 lr u i u +r iJ u V This page was intentionally left blank 1 60 t w w W section 3- Page 8 LI 1..1 il IWI V u SECTION 4, BUDGET REVIEW BY DISTRICT it i.� u J J u U u Budget Review by District All Districts Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review 6 Months Ended 12/31/96 ` Operating Budget Review 1995-96 Year-To- Remaining Year-To-Date Budget Date Budget % Expanded REVENUES: Tax Levy(No. 11 Bond Fund Only) 17.000 1,863 15,137 10.96% Tax Alloca8ons/Subventions(Share of 1%) 31,146,000 14,165,740 16,980,260 4548% Federal and State Construction Grants - - - 0.00% Connection Fees 4,748,000 1.559.085 3,188,915 32.84% IRWD Fees 9,100,000 - 91100,000 0.00% Other Fees 67,511,000 33,645,496 33,865,504 49,84% Sale of Capacity Rights 644,000 5.883 638,117 0.91% r, Interest& Misc. Receipts 15.799,000 11.675,734 4,123,266 73.90% Other 2,000 2,000 0.00% Total Revenues 128,967,000 61,053,801 67,913,199 47.34% OUTLAYS: Share of Joint Works Trmt. Plant 33,530,000 8.287.008 25,242.992 24.72% r, District Trunk Sewer Construction 13,420,000 6.220,725 7.199.275 46.35% COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 34,618,000 19,812,712 14,805,288 57.23% Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 54,380,000 24,080,709 30,319,291 44.25% v District Operating&Other Expenditures 9,592,000 5,397,898 4,194,102 56.28% Total Outlays 145,540.000 63,779,052 81,760,948 43.82% Capital Facilities Budget Rmj@yr Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance s 7/1196 &Additions Fixed Assets 9130196 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: .a Districts 1-14 Construction in Progress 22,693,603 6,220,725 (14,416) 28,899.912 Share of Joint Works 56,099,663 8,287,008 (1,791,862) 61.594.809 Sub-Total 77.793,286 14,507,733 (1,806,278) 90,494.721 COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT&EQUIP: Land and Property Rights 2,646,921 - - 2,645,921 Collection Lines and Pump Suns. 277,817,024 4 8,710 277,825,738 Treatment Facilities 19,922 - - 19,922 Disposal Facilities 101,528 - - 101,528 General Plant and Admin. Facil. 855,176 - 5,706 860,882 Equity in Joint Treatment Facil. 692.378,501 (5,832,286) 1,791,862 688.338,077 _ Other Assets at Cost Less Amon. 91,868 (33,246) 58,622 Sub-Total 973,909,940 (5,865,528) 1,806,278 969.850,690 Total Property, Plant& Equipment&CIP 1,051,703.206 8,642,205 - 1,060,345,411 Section 4-Page 1 Li 1995-96 Mid-Year Report District 1 - Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review 6 Months Ended 12/31195 iI ODerill Budget Review 1995-96 Year-To- Remaining Year-to-Date Budget Dale Budget % Expended REVENUES: Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Only) - - - 0.0o% j� I Tax Alloptions/Subvemions(Share of 1%) 2,105,000 834.011 1,270,969 39.62% V Federal and State Construction Grants - - - 0.0D% Connection Fees 71,000 2.350 68,650 3.31% 1 Other Fees 6,447,000 3,043,726 3,403,274 47.21% V.1 Sale of Capacity Rights 63,000 1,099 61,901 1.74% Interest&Misc. Receipts 925,000 875,829 49,171 94.68% Other - - 0.00% yy Total Revenues 9,611,000 4.757,015 4,853,985 49.50% OUTLAYS: Share of Joint Works Tnnt. Plant 3,279,000 815,921 2,463,079 24,88% District Trunk Sewer Construction 75,000 - 75,000 0.00% COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 4,289,000 2,619,629 1,669,371 61.08% 60 Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 5.411,000 2,478,056 2,932,944 45.80% District Operating&Other Expenditures 587,000 414,311 172,689 70.58% Total Outlays 13,641,000 6,327,917 7,313,083 46.39% Capital Facilities Budget Review j Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance 711/96 &Additions Fixed Assets 12/31/96 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: District No. 1 Projects - Sub-Total - - - Share of Joint Works 5,414,989 815,921 (176,140) 6,054,769 Sub-Total 5,414,989 815,921 (176,140) 6,054,769 i v COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT&EQUIP: Land and Property Rights 81,398 - - 81,398 Collection Lines and Pump Stns. 6.902,929 - - 6,902,929 Treatment Facilities - - - - Disposal Facilities 11,593 - - 11,593 General Plant and Admin. Facil. 58,241 - - 58,241 Wd Equity in Joint Treatment Facil. 69.566,209 (573.290) 176,140 69.169,059 Other Assets at Cost Less Amort. 1,424 (570) - 854 Sub-Total 76,621,794 (573,860) 176,140 76,224,074 L Total Property, Plant& Equipment&CIP 82,036,763 242,061 - 82,278,843 6d Section 4-Page 2 1 ' L Budget Review by District d District No. 2 -Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review 6 Months Ended 12/31/95 Ooetatina Budget Review 1995-96 Year-To Remaining Year-To-Date Budget Date Budget % Expended m REVENUES: Tax Levy(Bond Funds)Only) - - - 0.00% Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of 1%) 9,515,000 4,350,678 5,164.322 45.72% Federal and State Construction Grants - - - 0.00% Connection Fees 2.350,000 972,312 1.377.688 41.37% Other Fees 22,633,000 10,648.666 11,984,334 47.05% Sale of Capacity Rights 191,000 (1,000) 192,000 -0.52% Interest&Misc. Receipts 4,665,000 3.288,494 1.366,506 70.64% Other 2,000 2,000 0.00% Total Revenues 39,346,000 19,259,150 20.086,850 48.95% m OUTLAYS: Share of Joint Works Trent. Plant 9.921.000 2,474.462 7,446,538 24.94% District Trunk Sewer Construction 700,000 382,416 317,584 54.63% COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 11,392,000 6.945.367 4,446,633 60.97% Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 17,619,000 7.629.277 9.989,723 43.30% District Operating&Other Expenditures 2,202,000 1.582.996 619.002 71.89% Total Outlays 41.834,000 19,014.520 22,819,480 45.45% Capital Facilities Budget Review Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance 7H/95 &Additions Fixed Assets 12/31/95 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: 2-14-5112 SARI Manhole 155,846 139,777 - 295,623 2-7A Atwood Subtmnk @ 91/57 Interchange 5.319 6,948 - 12,167 2-38 Olive Subtrunk&BAR Crossings for S.A.Widening 13,624 - - 13,624 w 2-37 Miscellaneous Improvements to Pump Stations 325 - - 325 2-36 Sewer Encasements for AT&SF Commuter Rail 64,648 115,608 - 180,256 - 2-9-RI Cypress Ave.Subtmnk Sewer Rehab. 2,894.115 119,380 - 3.013.495 Misc Chgs to Closed Work Orders 6,184 219 - 6,403 d 2-35 Euclid Trunk B Interceptor 8.167 584 8.751 Sub-Total 3,148.228 382.416 3.530,64.4 m Share of Joint Works 16.180.235 2,474.462 (527,345) 18.127,352 Sub-Total 19.328,463 2,856,878 (527,345) 21.657,996 COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT& EQUIP: v Land and Property Rights 517,694 - - 517,694 Collection Lines and Pump Stns. 93.701.134 - - 93.701.134 Treatment Facilities - - - - Disposal Facilities 33.172 - - 33,172 General Plant and Admin. Facil. 215,420 - - 215.420 Equity in Joint Treatment Facil. 205,201,314 (1,716.370) 527,345 204,012,289 e Other Assets at Cost Less Amon. 60.100 (10.221) 49.879 Sub-Total 299.728.834 (1,726,591) 527,345 298,629,688 Total Property, Plant&Equipment&CIP 319,057,297 1.130,287 320,187,584 Section 4-Page 3 L 1995-96 Mid-Year Report District No. 3 -Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review V( 6 Months Ended 12131/96 Operating Budget Review I 1995-96 Year-To. Remaining Year-To-Data ne Budget Data Budget % Expended REVENUES: Y, Tex Levy(Bond Funds)Only) - - - 0.00% Tax AI!arationsJSutiventions(Sham of l%) 10,615.000 4.883,452 5.731,548 46.01% Federal and State Consuucuon Grants - - - 0.00% Connection Fees 1.410,000 63.920 1,346,000 4.53% .� Other Fees 22,314,000 11.670,205 10,643.795 52.30% Sale of Capacity Rights 196,000 (8,484) 204,484 4.33% Interest B Misc.Receipts 5,070,000 3.680.495 1.389,505 72.59% Other 0.00% Gil Total Revenues 39,605,000 20,289,588 19,315,412 5123% OUTLAYS: Sharp of Joint Works Tmd.Plant 10,213.000 2447A76 7,765,524 23.06% y Distinct Trunk Sewer Construction 5.288.000 1.610.020 3,677,980 30.45% COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 10,694,000 6.284.245 4,409,755 55.76% Sham of Joint Works Operating Expenses 16,564,000 7,207.373 9,356.627 43.51% District Operating&Other Expenditures 2,516,000 1,535.402 980.598 61.03% Total Outlays 45,275,000 19,084,516 26,190,484 42.15% i Capital Facilities B} cloet Review yral Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance 711195 &Additions Fixed Assets 12/31/95 1 ! CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: lek 3-250mnge-Western 5uo-Trunk Relief Sewer 56,509 - - 56,609 11-17 Slater PIS Upgrade-3&11 900.481 179,329 - 1,087,810 r 3.36 Teethe Pipe Replacement 1,563292 420.691 1,983,963 r 3-36R Rapt.Westminster Ave.Force Mains 222,510 637.341 - 859.951 3-371-5 widening Protect 8,177 116 - 8,293 3.38 Mi1ler4folder Trunk Sewer Improvements 410.491 27,220 - 437,711 3-38-1 Improv,to Miller-Hadar Trask Sewer 2A20 - - 2.420 3.3&2 Improv.to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer 796.678 344.331 - 1,141.009 3-38-3 Improv.to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer 4,780 640 - 5.420 3-39 Miller-Holder Easement 8,752 - 8,752 1 Miscellaneous Charges to Closed W.O. 1,629 352 1.981 an' SuE-Tobl 3.983.819 1,610,020 5,593,839 Share of Joint Works 16.860.104 2.447.476 (545,801) 181761,779 y Sub-Total 20,843.923 4.057,496 (545.801) 24,355.618 COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIP: Land and Pmperty Rights 250,231 - - 280,231 Collection Lines and Pump Sms. 62.059.818 - - 62,069,818 Treatment Facilities 9,922 - - 9.922 Disposal Facilities 28,419 - - 2&419 y General Plant and Admin.Fact1. 317.991 - - 317,991 Equity in Joint Treatment Feed. 211,213.109 (1,T76,440) 545,801 209,911l Other Assets at Cost Lou Amon - - - - - Su?Total 273.919,490 (1,T76,440) 545,901 272,688.851 Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 294,763,413 2,281.056 297,044469 Id Section 4.Page 4 L u Budget Review by District District#5 -Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review 6 Months Ended 12/31/95 Operating Budget Review 1995-96 Year To. Remaining Year-To-Date Budget Date Budget %Expended REVENUES: Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Only) - - - 0.00% Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of 1%) 2,415,000 1,184,398 1,230,602 49,04% Federal and State Construction Grants - - - 0.00% Connection Fees 47,000 108,100 (61,100) 230.CD% Other Fees 2,719.000 1,511,076 1,207.924 55.57% Sale of Capacity Rights 23,000 1,642 21,358 7.14% m Interest&Misc. Receipts 1,295,000 886,30E 408,692 68.44% Other 0.00% Total Revenues 6.499,000 3,691,524 2,807.476 56.80% ve OUTLAYS: Share of Joint Works Trmt Plant 1,204,000 259.797 944,203 21.58% District Trunk Sewer Construction 500,000 209,068 290,932 41.81% COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 2,013,000 633.638 1,379,362 31 48% Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 2,007,000 964,429 1,042,671 4&05% District Operating&Other Expenditures 765.000 291,978 473,022 38A7% rd Total Outlays 6.489.000 2.358,910 4,130.090 36.35% Capital Facilities Budget Review Balance Adjustments Tmnsferto Balance 711195 &Additions Fixed Assets 12/31/95 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: ,e 5-33 Bay Bridge PIS Impr. 2,224 14 - 2,238 5.35 So.Coast Trunk Sewer-Ind Phases 1 &2 - 3,019 - 3.019 5-36 Crystal Cove P/S - 7,208 - 7,208 Miscellaneous Charges to Closed W.O. 1.041 894 - 1.935 5.31 Coast Highway Force Main Replacement 5&6 - 4 - 4 532 Bitter Pt&Rocky Pt PtS Improv.5&6 1.921 - - 1.921 5-37-3&4 PCH Gravity Swr Rehab 5&6 22,036 169,281 - 191,317 ..0 639 Siphon 5&6 695.190 16 - 695,206 Bey Bridge PIS Lighting 5&6 4,893 28,014 (8,274) 24.633 Hydrogen Peroxide Trials 5&14 714 618 1,332 Sub-Total 728.019 209,068 (8,274) 928.813 Share of Joint Works 2,028,462 259,797 (64,686) 2,223.573 Sub-Total 2,756,481 468,865 (72.960) 3,152.386 4, COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIP: Land and Property Rights 69,740 - - 69.740 Collection Lines and Pump Stns. 33,827,105 - 8.274 33,835.379 Treatment Facilities 7,347 - - 7,347 .e Disposal Facilities 7,115 - - 7,115 General Plant and Admin. Facil. 39,799 (397) - 39.402 Equity In Joint Treatment Facll. 25.554.914 (210,780) 64.686 25,408.820 .. Omer Assets at Cast Less Amort. 18.009 (14.009) 4,000 Sub-Total 59.524.029 (225.186) 72,960 59,371.803 Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 62,280,510 243,679 62.524.169 y Section 4-Page 5 L 1995-96 Mid-Year Report District No. 6-Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review d 6 Months Ended 12/31/95 Operating Budget Review 1995-96 Year-To- Remaining Year-To-Oats Budget Date Budget % Expended REVENUES: Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Only) - - - 0.00% Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of 1%) 1,225,000 646,399 678,601 44.60% Federal and State Construction Grants - - - 0.00% 1 ; Connection Fees 47,000 19,270 27,730 41.00% 6A Omer Fees 3,400,000 1,783,705 1,616,295 52.46% Sale of Capacity Rights 31,000 (3,236) 34,236 -10.44% Interest&Misc.Receipts 747,000 630.638 116,362 84.42% 6� Other 0.00% Total Revenues 5.450,000 2,976,776 2,473,224 64.62% OUTLAYS: {w Share of Joint Works Turd. Plant 1,596,000 349,210 1.246,790 21.88% District Trunk Sewer Constnrction 1,735,000 762.751 972,249 43.96% COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 1.468,000 769,098 698,902 52.39% Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 2,599,000 909,399 1.689,601 34.999/6 'y District Operating&Other Expenditures 251,000 138,8D0 112,200 55.30% Total Outlays 7,649.000 2,929.258 4,719,742 38.30% W Capital Facilities Budget Review Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance 711195 &Additions Fixed Assets 12131195 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Mist. Chg.to Closed Work Order (32,767) 3,569 - (29,198) M 14-1-1 A&B Gisler Int., 14-1-2 Baker Street 1,079,358 65,832 - 1,145,190 6-12 Fabvelw Relief 248.599 16,222 - 264.821 6-13 Air Base Sewers Abandonment 29.699 - - 29,599 Airbase Flowmeter Replacement 19,155 - - 19.155 5-32 Bitter Pt&Rocky PI P/S Imprint.5&6 700 2 - 702 5-37-3&4 PCH Gravity Swr Rehab 5&6 8,891 677,125 - 686,016 5-39 Siphon 5&6 36,589 1 36.590 Sub-Total 1,390,124 762.751 - 2.152.875 Share of Joint Works 2.623.625 349ZO (84,038) 2,888,797 dri Sub-Total 4,013,749 1,111,961 (84,038) 5,041,672 COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIP: 1 Land and Property Rights 562 - - 562 Iml Collection Lines and Pump Stns. 4,179,148 - 4.179,148 Treatment Facilities 2.653 - - 2.653 Disposal Facilities 7.394 - - 7,394 - 9 General Plant and Admin.Facil. 94.197 397 4,594 4' Equity in Joint Treatment Facil. 32,001,104 (273,523) 84,038 31,811.619 Other Assets at Cost Less Amort. 9,011 (7,117) - 1,894 Sub-Total 36,294,069 (280,243) 84,038 36,097.864 Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 40,307,818 831.718 41,139,536 Section 4-Page 6 L Budget Review by District District No.7 -Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review 6 Months Ended 12131195 - Operating Budget Review 1995-96 Year-To- Remaining Year-to Daee Budget Date Budget %Expended REVENUES: d Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Only) - - - 0.00% Tax Allocations/Subventiens(Sham of l%) 3,230.000 1,408.295 1,821,705 43.60% Federal and Slate Construction Grants - - - 0.00% Connection Fees 235.000 196,333 48.667 79.29% G Other Fees 5,960,000 2.878.995 3.081,005 48.31% Sale of Capacity Rights 53,000 11,550 41,450 21.79% Interest&Misc.Receipts 1,526,000 1,112,990 413.010 72.94% Other 0.00% G Total Revenues 11,004,000 5,598,163 5,405.837 50.87% OUTLAYS: Share of Joint Works Tont.Plant 2,780,000 765,588 2,014.412 27.54% District Trunk Sewer Construction 2,400,000 1.890,275 509,725 78.76% COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 2,401,000 1.364.986 1,036,014 66.85% Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 4,655,000 2.258,488 2,396,512 48.52% Ostrict Operating&Other Expenditures 1,959,000 856,484 1,102,516 43.72% " Total Outlays 14,195,000 7,135,821 7,059,179 50.27% Capital Facilities Budget Review ,® Balance Adjustments Transforto Balance 711195 &Additions Fixed Assets 12/31195 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: 7-22 Parallel&Repl.Lemon Heights 173,397 1,197.047 - 1,370,444 `�• 7.23-1 College Ave. Pump Son Repl Force Mains 16,991 1.020 - 18.011 Mac Arthur PIS Ventilation 5.706 - (5,706) - 7.7-1 Main St P/S Impmv. 54,852 41,705 - 96.557 r 7-18 Orange Park Acres Sewer Study 124,537 - - 124.537 7-19 Cowan Heights Sewer 55,335 - - 55,335 14-1-1 A&B Gisler Int,14-1-2 Baker Street Force Main Districts 6,7&14 2,315,534 149,618 - 2,465,152 S, Swr Mice Easement Index Books 13.238 - - 13,238 7-14 Abandon 9 P/S,7-14.1&2 239,168 475,401 - 714,569 7-16 Lemon Heights Sewer 57,172 400 - 57,572 7-1-1 Gisler/Redhill Trunk Abandonment 9,716 676 - 10,392 �+ Techde Pipe Replacement 2,563 - 2,663 7-17 Orange Park Acres Sewer Repl. 35.160 - - 35,160 Miscellaneous Charges to Closed W.O. 1,876 24,408 26,284 m Sub-Total 3,105,345 1,890275 (5,706) 4,989,914 Share of Joint Works 4.552,553 765.588 (150.337) 5.167,805 Sub-Total 7,657,898 2.655.063 (156,043) 10.157,719 w COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIP: Land and Property Rights 1,549.310 - - 1.549.310 . Collection Lines and Pump Sins. 36.089,277 4 - 36.089,281 Treatment Facilities - - - - `� Disposal Facilities 10,782 - - 10,782 General Plant and Admin.Facil. 92,099 - 5,706 97.805 Equity in Joint Treatment Facil. 57,219.422 (489,30B) 160,337 56,880.451 Other Assets at Cost Less AmorL 3,324 (1,329) 1.995 Sub-Total 94,964,214 (490.633) 166.043 94.629,624 Total Property,Plants Equipment&CIP 102,622,112 2,185,230 104,787.343 -. Section 4-Page 7 1995-96 Mid-Year Report District No. 11 -Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review ti 6 Months Ended 12/31/96 Operating Budget Review u 1995-96 Year-To- Remaining Year-to-Date Budget Date Budget % Expended REVENUES: � Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Only) 17.000 1,863 15,137 10.96% Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of 1%) 2,041,000 958,507 1,082,493 46.96% i i Federal and State Construction Grants - - - 0.00% iol Connection Fees 118,000 206,800 (88,800) 175.25% Other Fees 3,220,000 1,718,029 1,501,971 53.35% 'I Sale of Capacity Rights 40,000 4,925 35,075 12.31% ti+ Interest B Misc. Receipts 931,000 820,322 110,678 88.11% Other - - - 0.00% Total Revenues 6,367,000 3,710,446 2,656,554 58.28% OUTLAYS: Share of Joint Works Tnnt Plant 2,099,000 534,434 1,564,566 26.46% 6, District Trunk Sewer Construction 1.635,000 968,281 666,719 59.22% COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 2,176,000 1,107,791 1,068,209 50.91% Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 3,486,000 1,866,046 1,619,954 63.63% 160 District Operating &Other Expenditures 737,000 412,082 324,918 55.91% Total Outlays 10,133,000 4.888,634 5,244,366 48.24% , Capital Facilities Budget Review Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance 711195 &Additions Fixed Assets 12/31195 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Slater P/S Motor&Pump 47 - - 47 11-17 Slater P/S Sewage Sys Improv. 4,414,216 966,281 - 5,382,497 Miscellaneous Charge to Closed W.O. 954 - - 954 Sub-Total 4,415,217 968,281 - 5,383,498 id Share of Joint Works 3,471,604 534,434 (113,246) 3,892,792 Sub-Total 7,886,821 1,502,715 (113,246) 9,276,290 yj COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIP: Land and Property Rights 146,986 - - 146,986 5 Collection Lines and Pump Stns. _ 19,048,602 - - 19,048,602 4J Treatment Facilities - - - - Disposal Facilities 3,053 - - 3,053 ' General Plant and Admin. Facil. 30,682 - - 30,682 Equity in Joint Treatment Facil. 43,058,620 (368,585) 113,246 42,803,281 Other Assets at Cost Less Amort. - - - - I Sub-Total 62,287,943 (368,585) 113,246 62,032,604 1p Total Property, Plant&Equipment&CIP 70,174,764 1,134,130 - 71,308,894 U Section 4-Page 8 I� Budget Review by District ® District No. 13 - Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review 6 Months Ended 12/31/95 O ej ring Budget Review 1995 -96 Year-To- Remaining Year-To-Date m Budget Date Budget %Expended REVENUES: Tax Levy (Bond Fund(s)Only) - - - 0.00% Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of 1%) - - - 0.00% Federal and State Construction Grants - - - 0.00% Connection Fees 470,000 - 470,000 0.00% Other Fees 818,000 388,414 429,586 47.48% Sale of Capacity Rights 6,000 577 5,423 9.62% Interest& Misc. Receipts 382,000 299,158 82,842 78.31% Other - 0.00% Total Revenues 1.676,000 688,149 987,851 41.06% OUTLAYS: Share of Joint Works Tm t. Plant 322,000 92,404 229,596 28.70% District Trunk Sewer Construction 472,000 - 472,000 0.00% COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 27,000 12,780 14.220 47.33% Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 576,000 258,478 317,522 44.87% District Operating& Other Expenditures 64,000 18,710 45,290 29.23% Total Outlays 1.461,000 382,372 1,078,628 26.17% Capital Facilities Budget Review Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance 7/1/95 &Additions Fixed Assets 12/31/95 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Share of Joint Works 516,108 92,404 (17,202) 591,310 Sub-Total 516,108 92,404 (17,202) 591,310 COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT& EQUIP: Land and Property Rights - - - - Collection Lines and Pump Sins. 2,616,757 - - 2,616,757 Treatment Facilities - - - - Disposal Facilities - - - - General Plant and Admin. Facil. - - - - Equity in Joint Treatment Facil. 6.402"0 (55,988) 17,202 6,363,654 - Other Assets at Cost Less Amon. - - - - Sub-Total 9,019.197 (55.988) 17,202 8,980,411 Total Property, Plant& Equipment&CIP 9,535,305 36.416 - 9,571,721 Section 4-Page 9 1995-96 Mid-Year Report District No. 14 -Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review 6 Months Ended 12/31/95 Operating Budget Review i 1995-96 Year-To- Remaining Year-to-Date Budget Date Budget % Expended REVENUES: r Tax Levy(Band Fund(s)Only) - - - 0.00% Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of 1%) - - - 0.00% Federal and State Construction Grants - - - 0.00% IRWD Fees 9,100,000 - 9.100.000 0.00% Other Fees - 2,680 (2,680) 0.00% r Sale of Capacity Rights 41,000 (1,190) 42,190 -2.90% ' Interest& Misc. Receipts 268,000 81,500 186,500 30.41% Other 0.00% Total Revenues 9.409,000 82,990 9,326,010 0.85% L, OUTLAYS: Share of Joint Works Trmt. Plant 2,116,000 547.716 1,568,284 25.88% r District Trunk Sewer Construction 615,000 397,914 217,086 64.70% i COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 158,000 75,178 82,822 47,58% V Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 1,463,000 489,163 973,837 33.44% District Operating&Other Expenditures 511.000 147,133 363,867 28.79% ty Total Outlays 4,863,000 1,657,104 3,205,896 34.08% Capital Facilities Budget Review 1 Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance L 7/1f95 &Additions Fixed Assets 12/31/95 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Main Street Flume Flowmeter - 40 - 40 14-1.1 A&B Gisler Int., 14-1-2 Baker St. Force Main, Districts 6,7& 14 5,827,644 396,367 - 6.224,011 j Main St. Pump Station Improvements 7-7-1 94.911 - - 94,911 !✓ Bay Bridge PIS Lighting 5&6 258 1,474 (436) 1,296 Hydrogen Peroxide Trials 38 33 - 71 ` ei Bub-Total 5,922,851 397,914 (436) 6,320,289 Share of Joint Works 3,451,983 547,716 (113,067) 3,886,632 Sub-Total 9,374,834 945,630 (113.503) 10,206,921 COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIP: Land and Property Rights - - - - Collection Lines and Pump Stns. 19.382,254 - 436 19,382,690 ~ Treatment Facilities - - - - Disposal Facilities - - - - General Plant and Admin. Facil. 6,747 - - 6,747 Equity in Joint Treatment Facil. 42,161.369 (368.002) 113,067 41,906,434 Other Assets at Cost Less Amort. - - - - L Sub-Total 61,550.370 (368,002) 113,503 61,295,871 Total Property, Plant&Equipment&CIP 70,925,204 577,628 - 71,502,792 I Section 4-Page 10 4 U u Li u SECTION 5. SELF-INSURANCE FUNDS BUDGET REVIEWS J J .1 f .I 1 Self-Ins. Review Medical Fund Budget Review 6 Months Ended 12131/95 Percent Actual of Budget Remaining Actual 1995.96 Through Through 1995-96 Through Increase Budget 12131195 12131196 Budget 12/31/94 (Decrease) .r Beginning Cash Balance 15,000 85,952 Revenues: In-Lieu Prom. -CSDOC 400,000 172,473 43.12% 227,527 135,172 37,301 ..r. -Employees 75.000 21,613 28.82% 53,387 15,957 5,656 Reimburse from Stop Loss Ins - - 339 (339) Interest&Other 1,206 (1,206) 1,206 Total Revenues 475,000 195,292 41.11% 279,708 151.468 43,824 -, Expenditures: Claims-Medical' - - 0,00% - 6,203 (6,203) ,y -Dental 387,000 119,543 30.89% 267,457 159,377 (39,834) Contractural Services 50,000 18.053 36.11% 31,947 23,404 (5,351) Total Expenditures 437,000 137,596 31.49% 299,404 188,984 (51,388) Excess Revenue(Expense) 38,000 57,696 151.83% (19,696) (37.516) 95,212 r Ending Cash Balance 53,000 57,696 108.86% (19,696) 48,436 95,212 'Medical insurance has been purchased rather a than self-funded since February 1994. Section 6-Page 1 L Mid-Year Report LL Public Liability Fund Budget Review 6 Months Ended 12/31/95 Percent Actual of Budget Remaining Actual 1995-96 Through Through 1996-96 Through Increase Budget 12/31/95 12/31/95 Budget 12131/94 (Decrease) bG Beginning Cash Balance' 3,356,000 3,315,495 3,392,913 Revenues: u In-Lieu Premiums 100,000 - 0.00% 100,000 - - Interest&Other 200,000 89,743 44.87% 110,257 92,007 (2,264) Allocation to Other Funds - 32,475 0.00% (32,475) 32,475 Total Revenues 300,000 122,218 40.74% 177,782 92,007 30,211 L Expenditures: Salaries 1,000 3,143 314.30% (2,143) - 3,143 " Claims 90,000 22,000 24.44% 68,000 4,579 17,421 N Contractual Services 20,000 656 3.28% 19,344 1,941 (1,185) Legal Services 150,000 99,524 66,35% 50,476 21,222 78,302 1 Professional Services 10,0D0 462 4.62% 9,538 1,510 (1,048) �I Supplies 8 Other 1,000 114 11.40% 886 - 114 Total Expenditures 272,000 125,899 46.29% 146,101 29,152 96,747 V Excess Revenue(Expense) 28,000 (3,681) (13.15%) 31,681 62,855 (66,536) L Ending Cash Balance 3,384,000 3,311,814 97.87% 72,186 3,455,768 (143,954) Ir Includes$720,208 long-term receivable due from the County of Orange. L ti L 61 Section 5-Page 2 L Self-ins. Review w Worker's Compensation Fund Budget Review 6 Months Ended 12/31/95 Percent .. Actual of Budget Remaining Actual 199649 Through Through 1"5.96 Through Increase Budget 1=1195 12/31/95 Budget 12/31194 (geCr ) Y Beginning Cash Balance' 795,000 848,241 748,810 Revenues: In-Lieu Premiums 225,000 112,500 50.00% 112,500 112,500 - Interest&Other 43,000 19,601 45.58% 23,399 16,614 2,987 Tonal Revenues 268,000 132,101 49.29% 135,899 129,114 2,987 Expenditures: Salaries 10,000 - 0.00% 10,000 - - Claim 165,000 88,940 53.90% 76,060 44,951 43,989 Contractual Services 35,000 12,500 35.71% 22,500 12.648 (148) Legal Services 5,000 - 0.00% 5.000 - - Professional Services 35,000 9,659 27.60% 25,341 13,325 (3,666) Supplies&Other 12.000 0.00% 12,000 Sub Total 262,000 111,099 42,40% 150,901 70.924 40,175 w Excess Loss Policy 45,000 10.830 24.07% 34.170 19,170 (8,340) Total Expenditures 307,000 121.929 39.72% 185,071 90,094 31,835 Excess Revenue(Expense) (39,000) 10,172 (26.08%) (49,172) 39,020 (28,848) Ending Cash Balance 756,000 658,413 87.09% 97,587 787,830 (129.417) Includes$151,754 long-term receivable due from the County of Orange Section S-Page 3 L L L L+ L L IL L lr This page was intentionally left blank L Ir L 6' Li L LJ L L SecUm 5-Pogo 4 L L� I�{ SECTIONS 6. & 7. OPERATIONAL REVIEW L1 li 'J Ui i1 Activity Trends Joint Operating expenses are 44%of budget through the first half of the year. Budget savings have been realized on chemicals as new contract prices have declined. Green Acres Project water prices have also declined as a result of the renegotiated agreement for 1995-96. Natural gas use is decreasing as we gain experience with the Central Generation Facilities. Overall, salaries have increased by only 3.20% compared to last year as a result of savings from the early retirement program and an average vacancy rate of approximately 10%in authorized positions. Salary expenses will continue to increase over last year as a result of new hires being included and accounted for over the remaining quarters. 700 $627.30 $599.00 600 $555.87 500 400 095-96 Budget ■95-96 Target ■6 Mwthserded 12/31195 300 236.85 236.85 237.50 200 100 r 0 Treatment Cost, Average Daily Flow, $per MG MGD Section 6 - Page 1 L Mid - Year Report J Board Secretary: The initial preparation hrm s submitted for Joint Board agenda pactaages and minutes as reflected In the 9596 Budget were L✓ estimates made without baseline data. Beginning in July, 1995, the Board Secretary's Office has tracked actual time spent on these tasks. The first six months reflects actual hours spent on the Joint Board agenda paGage and minutes. The differentiation between estimates and acluals was unanticipated;however a comparison between first quarter data and sir month data radicals the listed Ems is more agate than anginal estimates. These data will be used for future baseline pmlections V Iwf 450 43.0 40.0 6w 35.0 30.0 1 25.0 20.0 V 095-96 Budget 20.0 17.0 ■6 Months Ended 15.0 i 10.0 Li 4.0 8A � 0.0 rr Agenda Prep.Thne, Completion of Minutes, Mrs. Nrs, Communications: L The number of tours during the first su months is an target with annual estimates. The number M people contacted was extraordinarily high during the first quarter as it Includes throe individuals who visited the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County booth at the Orange County Fair. Second quarter contacts averaged approximately 1000,plating us ahead of the annual r projection. The number of informational materials provided is also extmon inadly high due to our participation in the Orange County Fair. This has impacted the 6,rmonth cumulative figure. The division remains on target for the number of newsletters published. 320 r 300 I 250 222 r 200 O9S%Budget 06 Months Ended 150 it 100 100 + 90 81 51 50 25 14 0 No.of Tours 8 No.of People Informational No.of Employee Presentations Contacted Materials Newsellers X 100 Provided X 100 Published 6d Section 6 - Page 2 L+ Activity Trends Finance Administration: The required coverage ratio for senior lien debt,the ratio of certain revenues to the debt service costs,is 1.25. Because one-ha8 of �+ property taxes and user fees are received in December,and principal payments are made in August and February,the ratio will decline during the remainder of the year. Investment Interest earnings are running ahead of the budgeted yield as PIMCO manages our portlolic. Variable Interest rates required to remarket the COP issues have been favorable during the that quarter,as the"Orange County"penally has declined and investors are more comfortable wish our credit. Approximately hall of our outstanding COPs era"synthetic-fined"rate obligations. The number of COP issues outstanding is not expected m change this year as no new debt was budgeted. 9.00 8e5% 8.00 ee 7.00 6.00 5.78 6 6 5.00% 4. 5.00 O° 09&96 Budget 75 4.50 ■6 Months Ended 4.00 3.00 2 28 w 2.00 1.0 m 0'00 VIeM%on Avg.COP Outstanding Sr.Debt Svc. Invested Interest Rate COP Issues Coverage Ratio Reserves % Accounting: s, Accounts payable warrants and payroll warrants par FTE are slightly behind annual projections,however they are within expected estimates as they are running rn 47%of annual totals. Both Industrial user bills and journal entries processed per FTE are also within the anticipated range. 5,900 c 6.000 5.000 4.100 4,000 3.750 3.000 2,760 095-96 Budget 2,094 Me Months Ended 2AW 1.781 952 r 1,000 486 0 Accounts Payable Payroll Warrants Industrial User Bills Journal Entries r" Warrants Issued Processed Processed Per FTE Pfamesetl Per FTE Per FTE Per FTE Section 6 - Page 3 Mid - Year Report u Purchasing& Warehousing: Purchase orders issued per Full-time Equivalent(FTE)are slightly below an expected 6-norM bards as precedual changes Impacted purchase order issuance,as well ss the Districts-wide commitments to reduce Me Joint Operating Expense budget by 10-A. The u number of bids per FTE has greatly exceeded inifial estimates as several RFPs were added for maintenance and professional services fomterly handled in-house. As atltlftlonal oppmtunitiea arise to lower operating costs by awarding maintenance contracts W outside firths,bids will increase. Warehouse issues par FTE are lower than this year's estimations,but in line with last year's actual. This is partially attributable to the Districts-wlde mmmdrtreMs to reduce the Joint Operating Expense budget by 10%anti b reduce the r number of hems kept in the warehouses. These hems include Pads such as nuts,bops and auto lifters. r 20,000 18,670 r 15 15.000 2 11.429 r 095-MBUO N 10.000 8.350 86 Mordlw Ended r 6.000 4.500 r 0.000 1---- P.O.'s Issued Per Wrden Bids Warehouse FTE X 10 Per FTE Issues Per FTE X 100 r r r r r r r r Section 6 - Page 4 Activity Trends Information Technology Administration: Computer Users Supported Per FulkTime Equivalerd(FTE)is based on the number of staff members In Information Technology Department(ITD)tasked with provk ing direct support. The wrtent 57 FTE Userststaa m8ects what we believe to be an understating issue that has a direct marmot on our ability to adequately support the Districts'computer users. This figure will be lowered when a contract is approved for outsourcing some of the hardware and software support,thereby allowing in-house staff to t7 conduct tasks not easily connected. Hardware Work Orders per FTE represent the number of Work Orders completed divided by the number of RD staff assigned to such requests. The original benchmark of 17 was based solely on estimates as opposed to actual data and is obviously inaccurate when compared against the 93IFTE year-to-date. Programmable Logic Controllers am on target with Data Points behind the expect mid-year point:remover,many data points will be installed the third quarter. 120 m 120 93 m 72 67 095-96Budget 40 66 Mouths Ended 30 pg Z1 13 8 e 0 17 Plant Automation Computer Users Hardware Work Progarou ale Loglo Addmbiwl Data Supported per FTE Orders par FTE Comhoams Inrsued Points Instil orlon) Hardware Support: The phone directory numbers maintained per FIE Indicates the number of PBX or telephone lines serviced. Unexpected expansion d In this system has assured in more numbers maintained than those reflected In the Activity Trend estimates for FY 199b96. Similarly,due to the increasing use of technology,we have more personal computers than initially estimated. This case is also reflected in the Card Readers graphic. Hardware work orders per FTE also reflect an unanticipated increase. Be u use of the r addi8ons of the aforementioned devices,work orders to install and maintain them have also increased beyond initial estimates. 99 100.0 90.0 I 80.0 70.0 60.0 go ,y 095-96 Budget 60.0 i 11116 Months Ended 40.0 30.0 G 20.0 13.0 16.7 8 12 Fm10.0 --aininis- I r 0.0 Directory Numbers Personal Hardware Work Card Readers out Makdeinsdi Computer Ordem/FTE Maintained/FTE X10 MaimalnedlFfE Section 6 -Page 6 L Mid - Year Report Software& Plant Automation: Software work orders per FrE is above FV 199596 Activity Trend estimates and is an increase war 1st quarter actuals. Prior to this fisal year, Information Technology(m utilized manual work orders. This process as been networked and automated via a Maintenance Management W System(MMS)Mat allows other divisions to direct work orders to IT eleotronially. The ease of directing work orders to fT,the additional internal controls requiring staff to he more stringent in documenting requests for service(e.g.quick service alp,and the expending user base account for the increase. The number of network users supported per FrE results from atldtiional computer purchases and knplemerdation. The vast majority of desktop computers are networked to one of several servers and thus ieqube ongoing netil troubleshooting, low maintenance,repair and upgrade. it 90 86 V 8D I 70 - L 60 �° L O9lF%Budget {p 38 06 Months Ended 30 - 20 7 „ L 0 } 01 , SoBwarework Nell L Orders/FIT Users Supported/FTE L I L I : 61 6d L Irrl L L Section 6 - Page 6 L Activity Trends Human Resources Administration: After further research,the Activ"dy Trends in the FY 1995-96 Budget required refinement to more accurately portray the Performance of the Human Resources Department. Employees supported by sea HR position is slightly below the goal. Increased cross-training and decreased regulation should allow us to achieve the target by next fiscel year. Human Resourcestmining as a percentageof operating expense generally reflects National benchmarks. 9.0 8.3 8.0 4 7.0 to eo O96B6 Budget 4.0 89 M1lnlls Ended 2.6 $.a 2.3% 2.0 1.0 0.0 1 F Employees Supported HRTmming as a% m Per Human Resource of Operating Expense Employee X10 Human Resources & Training: The Districts recruhmenl time Where to fill'numbers for new positions exceeds the National average by We to bur limes. This Is partially due to the proportionally significant number of new hires(some within new classifications)occurring relatively simultaneously over the m course of the last six months. Additional internal process controls should cut these numbers in had prior to July,1996. Posting Periods, physical exams,supervisory delays,and notices to previous employers all play a pan In the notably high numbers. Turnover compares extremely favorably to the benchmark for utility agencies and falls below the expected turnover redo of 10%nationally for private organizations. The Dishicls'cost Par hire Is better than other utility districts and private organizations in exempt recruitment Exempt employee costs ere significantly fewer as in-house staff are primarily used Instead of executive search fink. Non•exempl employee costs have increased. Factors contributing to this are being researched but am likely due to the Increased number of'singl"ostRW recruitments that occurred as opposed to recruitments filling more than one position in a given classification. s 160 150 140 120 100 at $85.0 80 ry 095-96 Budget so 37 INS Months Ended 60 40 $17.92 $12.8 $21.1 s, 20 7.8% 4.4% 0 No.of Recmitmerd No.of Rezmitmem Employee Cost Per Exempt Cost per Nan-Exempt m Days For Exempt Days For Non- Turnover Employee Hired Employee Hired Employees Exempt Employees X 100 X 100 Section 6 - Page 7 I N Mid - Year Report L Safety 8 Emergency Response: - During Me0rst six months.workem'mmpensa6on daims wham below the projection of twenty-two(22), Additionally,the Total Injury Rate was 6.5 as opposed to last years 6J—a 25%decrease. The Djshn s'aoddent experience is even more significant when compared to the 16.3 industry 6e average for Total Injury Rate,and Is notably lower than the Mro previous years. We believe this can be attributed to the successful Implementation of crew safety programs and Improvement in existing programs during the last several quarters. The last work day rating Is a reflation of these programs. Job Huard Analyses and Regulatory Compliance Audits are generally on target r 45 45 095-96 Budget v 40 11116 Months Ended 35 30 30 25 20 20 20 17 16 V 10 6.7 5 6.5 7} I 5 3 2.5 1.5 0 No.of Job Site Total Injury Job Hazard Workers' Safety Regulatory Los[Wodc Rate Comp.Claims Compliance Compliance Day Rate Analysis Audits Audds X 10 eiO Iss V bw Section 6 - Page 8 Activity Trends Maintenance Administration: As stipulated In the following maintenance sections,one of the pnmary focuses of the Maintenance Department in Facial Year 1995-961s m to develop a solid database for our Computerized Mandenance Management System(CMl thereby devoting more 0me to a total Planned Maintenance philosophy. The trends we develop this fiscal year will be utilized to project future expectations. The graph potmys We broad of CMMS Implementation and resource allocation on the Maintenance Depardri as well as the temporary freezing of authorized positions(WM tllscussed in fuller detail In Ore respective mairtenanw divisions). We all antiapate achieving a 2:1 ratio of preventive maintenance(pm)tasks versus coneaive maintenance(en)realm. This onto is widely accepted and considered progressive based on many maintenance industry benchmans/standarts. 60.0 52.0 50.0 40.0 46.4 p 30.0 26.1 G 2" 17A I 15 9.7 9.0 7.6 loo 6.4 5.0 4.7 0.0 Preventve Conedive Maint. Preventive Corrective a Maintenance Entered Inca Maintenance Tasks Maintenance Maintenance Tasks Completed Completed Backlog Bacldog Suspended Computer Cl 9598 Budget X 1000 X 1000 X 100 %100 %10 % 1000 06 Months Ended Maintenance Scheduling: The Planning 6 Scheduling Division is a new unit this fiscal year,and as such,did not have reliable himeline data to develop accurate Activity Trend benchmarks. The goals stipulated in the FY 1995-96 budget are only reasonable estimates of new job duties to selabiish fulum parameters. Disciplines have been reludant to mmova'unneeded'slork because May believed the hem wits would be deduded from their budgets. However,we have recommended a redudion in obsolescent inventory by$160.000 for Me first six months of the year. As a resuh of benchmerking preventive maintenance on major realty acceulemaints,our scheduled PM program for Prmary/Sewndary lumms and digesters meets or exceeds our initial estimates. The disciplines are implementing such PM programs beginning last month. 29 30.0 - 25e 25.0 20.0 095-96 5.0 Budget I 11 96 Months Ended 10.0 } }II 4 4 5 5.0 1.6 ® 0.0 12 Reduce Perform Preventive Malntemmos on: Obsolete Primary Digester Sexuadary Inventory,$ Basins Cleaning swim x 10,000 Section 6 - Page 9 Mid - Year Report Yrl Plant Maintenance: During Me first haM of FY 19W96,emphasis was placed on the continued development o1 Me Computerized Maintenance Management System(CRAMS)database and Its mquishe Inventory items. Approximately 78%and 73%respectively of the annual W target for'Pieces of Equipment-Computerized'and'Preventive Maintenance Instructions'have been achieved the first six months. Corrective tasks completed am well within targeted parameters,although PM tasks am below targets due to CRAMS Implementation. It should be noted that accurate metrics from previous years are not available for comparative purposes and FY 1995-96 Activity Trends y were beat estimates only. Trends developed this fiscal year will be utilized for future pmections. L 600.0 550.0 500 I i 500.0 f 202 lad °00'0 320.0 300.0 250.0 300 275 r ' ]3.6 202 20,D LI 100.0 F59.1 42 V 0.0 Preventive Corrective Preventive Corrective Pieces of Computerized Maintenance Tasks Maintenance Maintenance Maintenance Equipment Preventive Completed Tasks Backlog Backlog in Computer Maintenance OWN Budget X 10 Completed x 10 Database% 10 Inabuctiona 86 Months Ended r Collection Facli lea Maintenance: V Similar to outer maintenance divisions,Collection Fadl'rtlea is implementing this CRAMS system. Preventive and connective maintenance figures are much higher than annual estimates as the CMMS system came on-line for this Division sooner than expected, Computerized pieces of equlpment remain at 83%=.plate,while PM Instructions am 86%finished. Finally,spills reported are below projections and represent a positive hand that reflects our continued commitment to providing quality service and the Implementation of our expanded root control program for District 7. 90.0 86 80.0 09&96 Budget 86 Months Ended 70a 0.0 5 50 o.o °7'4 °0.0 30 35 30.0 19.7 20.0 21.5 20.0 197 6.0 12 10.0 0 y 0.0 Preventive Corrective Pieces of Active SPIIIs Tasks Tasks Preventive Corrective Equip. Preventive Reported Completed Completed Maintenance Maintenance Computerized Maintenance 1.1 %100 % 10 Backlog Baddog X1,000 Instructions Section 6 - Page 10 Activity Trends Mechanical Maintenance A major goal of Me Division for FY 1995-M is the emphases on the development of the Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS)database and is nyulsde inventory items. Approximately,83%of the annual target far'Please of Equipment-Computerized'has been achieved through the first six months. The Division is in the process of completing chose Miming of all field level staff. The rapid expansion of this database has resulted In a higher than anticipated preventive maintenance backlog. FUMennore,efforts to complete the Inventory database required a shift In resources.Preventive maintenance and connective tasks completed are within targeted parameters and we have considerably Improved our ongoing corrective maintenance backlog when compared against estimated annual Activity Trend projections. The Division has maintained a 12%vacancy rate in order to rowel the 10%reduction in the Joint Operating Expense budget 80.0 C SS96 Budget 75.0 700 M6 Months Ended 62.1 r OD.0 50'0 41.4 40.0 36.0 r 30.0 27.0 25.0 17.9 Be 17.5 15 15.3 0.3 20.0 10.0 m 0.0 Preventive Corrective Preventive Corrective Pieces of Computerized Maintenance Tasks Maintenance Maintenance Maintenance Equipment Preventive V° Completed Tasks Backlog Backlog in Computer Maintenance X 100 ComPletetl X 10 X 10 Database Instructions X 1p0 X100 X 100 Electrical Maintenance: A major goal of the Division for FV 1995-96 is the emphasis on the continued development of the Computerized Maintenance Management System(CMMS)database and its requite inventory gems. Approximately 95%of the annual target for'Recent of Equipment-Computerized has been achieved this quarter. The rapid expansion of this database has resulted in a higher than anticipated preventive maintenance backlog. Furthermore,efforts to complete Me inventory database required a shift in resources resuting in lower production in the Preventive Tasks Completed category. Conversely,corrective tasks completed are well within targeted parameters and we have considerably improved our conecbrve maintenance backlog when compared against estimated annual Activity Trend projections. The Division has maintained a 9% r vacancy rate in order to meet the 10%reduction in the Joint Operating Expense budget. Some positions will be filled in the third quarter and allow us to focus on improving the preventive maintenance lacks completed and PM backlog. 720 - O95-96 Budget 117.6 11116 Months Ended 100 + 75 B0 76.3 00 65 m 60 T 40 } 35. 332.5 33A 129 20.0 18 d 2p i 11.9 0 Places ar Prevenunw, Preven0kve CmrerAe penetabvs cormfive Marra ance MalnlenanceTasks Madeline. Mamie.. Ma,,cerance EWP.Campulerbed Intuctions Completed Tasks,Competed mckbg Backed Computeraee XIN X100 xIf) X100 x1W Section 6 - Page 11 m Mid - Year Report Instrumentation Maintenance: A major goal of the Division for FY 1995.96 is the emphasis on the cammued development of the Computerized Maintenance Management I System(CMMS)database and its requiem inventory items. Approximately 105%of the annual target for'Pwous of Equipment.Computerized' has been achieved this quarter. Bemuse of the development of new facilities,our Inventory has Increased and thus exceeded initial Activity Trend estimates in this category. Furthermore,efforts to complete the Inventory database required a shift in resources. The rapid expansion of this database has resulted In a higher than anbapeted preventive maintenance backlog and lower preventive maintenance tasks completed. I Corrective tasks completed are well wfihin targeted parematen. The Division has maintained a 19%vacenry rate in order to meet Me 10% L reduction in the Joint Operating Expense budget. Additional Nations will be filled In the that quarter and allow us to focus on Improving the preventive maintenance backlog as wall as provide supporting,comprehensive documentation to the CMMS database. L 160.0 095-96 Budget 146.0 L 140.0 M6 Months Ended 120.0 96.4 95.0 101.3 100.0 75.0 L 80.0 80.0 65.0 00.0 37.5 33.7 40.0 20.0 17.0 12.0 7.0 law Plavppya OMlacha Prevenlva nethe Pleces of Compumdmd Mal mMOM Task, Mob m Maintenance MaiC r�ienance Equipment Premiums CsrrlPlllld Talk, Backog in Compamr Mundane. x100 compawil Xto Daww"X 100 Instructions X 100 V L r L L I ! Li II V L' Section 6 -Page 12 Activity Trends Plant Operations: _ Act"trends for the firsts&months of f 1995-96 are generally"eking as expected when eompared against 1995-96 annual estimates. Actual expenditures for chemicals are below annual trends as are plant operations cast(per MGD). Lower per unit costs for caustic soda and hydrogen peroxide were achieved by price negotiations with veiMors. Actual plant operation division cart of$22D per million gallons is approximately 17%below the annual estimate of$265 per million gallons. Budget savings have been e realized through the aforementionetl unit casts on chemicals and staff vacancies which resulted in labor savings. 90.0 64.0 m 600 74 O9&96 Budget 06 Months Ended 70.0 re 60.0 $54.3 - 50.0 41.6 43.3 41.0 r 40.0 39 - 30.0 2.9723.E "4 $26.520.0 10.0 0.0 Influent Flow In Ene y Dsaoen kW 100 Chemical Tens of Millions Production Costs Division Cost in Pounds per Plant One Plant Two X 100,000 Per Million Gallons Of Gallons Million Gallons X 10 Per Day x 100 Section 6 - Page 13 r Mid - Year Report u Environmental Management., ` The Oman Monitoring Baseline Program is a lum"i ce contract wont$1.48 million that extends into FY 1996-97 and will not be fully expended until mat bmo. Charges urnalmul during the first se,months total E128,000. The target number of field samples V collected during me year for the baseline Ocean Monitoring Program(OMP)is 1284 samples of"ch 1057(82%)wem consoled during the first su months of me fiscal year. Typically,the bulk of collection Is accomplished In midsummer,wim remaining samplescollemidthroughoutthe year. Each year the Districts conmbute funds to me Southern Califotua Coastal Water Research V Project(SCCWRP)under a joint-powers agreement and expand addlional funds far OMP special studies. One of me epvdal studies conducted by Emlronmmbil Management Is the mammar¢atlon of water quality wdhln Our study area uM¢Ing a fuad grid of 32 stations. Water qualdy samples taken are an target. V 400.0 3" 350.0 L 095-96 Budget $310.0 300.0 86 Months Ended L 250.0 E245.0 200.0 L 173 $148.6 150.0 128A 1 105.7 V 100.0 SeeE487 E531 j$128 .0 Over SCCWRP Joint (keen Monitoring I Monte Powers Agreement Special Studies Water QualityVi Oman Monitoring Samples Taken Baselinro Program ring Conmbution Cosl X 10,000 X 1,000 X 1.000 16j Li L I Yrl J Section 6 - Page 14 II Li Activity Trends Environmental Sciences Laboratory. The Activity Trends noted In the FY 1995-96 Budget do not adequately quantify the duties and responsibilities of the Environmental Sciences Laboratory(ESL). As a result,we are modifying our reporting to better reflect lab operations. The information below depicts the actual number of analyses(through November) to be completed divided by the estimated number of analyses. Results greater than one Indicate the lab has performed more than initial estimates while numbers below one indicate performance less than estimates. Based on the data.75%(6 of 8)of the analyses completed are at or above projections. 1.2 _ 1 •NPDES INFIEFF 0.8 usourca control a opponents Control S ■Bbeollds _ 0.6 ■Marine Monitoring ■Special Projects DAIr _ q 0.4 138u n$' OSurt Zona 0.2 0 Samples Source Control: The new and renewed pemnit Issuance activlry,Is 69%of the six month estimate due to holidays and the scheduling of the permit renewals which are lower during the first half of every fiscal year. The routine sampling and inspection of facilities are 92%of the benchmark and are well within the expected trend. The downstream surveillance and Strike Force activities exceed the estimate by nearly 25%tlue to the increased need for further investigation of illegal dischargers. Enforcement actions are 88%of the activity trend benchmark due to fewer violations during the first six months. Remaining activity trends portrayed are within the expected range of variabilky. 300.0 095.96 Budget 266.8 _ 2500 E6 Months Ended 192.0 200.0 163.6 150.0 12.1 116 100.0 6.6 75.3 76.0 54.5 60.0 42026.1 33.6 24.016.6 ass 0.0 Nawend Routine Sampling and Downstream Enforcement ant ppromarent Pnmihee. Rofsmaan Renewed IneDetlianof Actions Enlorce al ofsmell 6urveillanms, Pmpnm � PermiAeO and Nory MminleVaaw &General Ovanary Issued Stoke Form Reports a6ued mm,aaa OaNaryaR %10 Orders DOireapontlenm DisfJlOrya(6 zm zto r Section 6 - Page 15 Mid - Year Report Engineering Administration: Further review of the FV 199596 Budget Activity trends resulted in additional quantification of activities. The original Capital Outlay Revolving Fund(CORF)forecast was$33.5 million of which$27.4 million was the direct responsibility of the Engineering Department. This$27.4 million budget has now been revised to$19 million through June 30, 1996 due to several factors. The primary factor is that several projects have been delayed including the primary rehabilitation projects and the Plant 2 Maintenance Building. The Plant 2 Warehouse has been delayed indefinitely,and budgets for some projects have been revised downward to more accurately reflect estimates of construction costs. These project delays have impacted the first six-months results whereby we have expended 26%of the revised budget,to date. 30 T $27.4 25 } 20 i 095-96 Budget 5 ■9S96 Projected . 06 Months Ended 10 } 1 $4.9 5 0 C.O.R.F.Expenditures (In millions) Design Engineering: Further review of the Design Engineering functions is resulting In modfication of the FY 1995-96 Activity Trend information as reflected below. The number of connection pannfls issued as well as number of design submittals reviewed represents fluctuating workload that may not hold to predictable quarterly patterns. Number of wnnection permits Issued exceed six month estimates while submittals reviewed am behind six month estimates. Most Capital Outlay Revolving Fund(CORF)projects will be bid late this fiscal year because budget uncertainties delayed establishing pralines and finalization of bid documents. Similarly,Collection Projects(by individual District)were delayed as well. 120 105.0 100 095-96 Budget e0 ■6 Months 60 Ended 40 35.0 40 .. 20 16 2 2 0 0 Ei No.of Connection No.of Submittals Budgeted CORF Budgeted Permits Issued Reviewed Projects Bid Collection X 10 Projects Bid Section 6 - Page 16 ® Activity Trends Engineering Planning Further review of the FY 199546 Budget Activity trends resulted in additional quantification of activitles. The development of the Strategic ® Plan was assigned to the Engineering Planning Division In July, 1995.During the that six months,the components of the plan were developed and the ground work lab for phase Implementation. A scope of work and schedule were adopted and a target data of 1196 act for completion of the new Strategic Plan. Phase I Is underway and Includes three projects:the rehabilitation of our existing ocean outfall,a study on e� hydraulic requirements,and a study to determine the most equitable capital and user charge system. The Board of Directors authorized issuance of Requests for Proposals and it is expected that a Professional Services Agreement will be approved in the third quarter. IS 199b- lee fXe rm rrve I I � i r � e r r 1 m mm elm m elm can mm e® ese mm env oav Construction Management The amount budgeted for CORP engineering construction pmects In the first six months Is low compared to the FY 1995-96 budget, This was m due to the uncertainty surrounding the County bankruptcy and the uhimate delay of projects. Our change orders am well below annual estimates due to aforementioned project delays as well as improved project planning. In particular,once change order resulted in a not $297,500 in our favor. G $20.0 $16.9 095-96 Budget 86 Months Ended m $15.0 $10.0 m 50% $5.0 $3.1 .2% E.0 CORF Dollar Amountal s Construction Change Orders as Projects %of Construction Contract Section 6 - Page 17 L L L Ir 11 L+ L V This page was intentionally left blank I u V u L.i L II U Section 6 -Page 18 i u Project Tracking Districts-Wide Measurement Tracking 98 Measurement Projects 60 — 50 40 m o Em @ 30 E � m z 12 20 —g 2 — 5 4 10 0 Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On HDid Canceled As part of the fiscal year 1995-96 budget process, performance measurement projects were established for all departments/divisions within the organization. The chart above shows a status summary, as of the end of the first quarter, of all the performance measurement projects approved in _✓ the 1995-96 budget document. The following pages present a status of each departments/divisions performance measures as of the r end of the first quarter. Section 7 - Page 1 Mid - Year Report L Executive Management 9 Measurement Projects L 9 L B 7 L. B kd 3 2 L i 0 i L Ahead On Track Done Behind On Hold i t/ Measurement This %Complete Status Start End Complete Consolidation Study. 85% On Track 711/95 - L Improve management skills of managers and supervisors. 50% On Track 711/95 - SuppodBoardsconslderationofcommBeestructurechange. 100% Done 711/95 12/31/95 Represent Distrcts'interests in Orange County bankruptcy. 85% On Track 711/95 - Ir Improve agency communication. 50% On Track 7/1/95 - Direct work on Districts'Strategic Plan. 20% On Track 7/1/95 - Createclimatethatpromoteschange. 50% On Track 711/95 - 6w Establish clear goals for the departments and all subordinate units. 100% Done 711/95 12/31/95 Renew NPDES ocean discharge permit. 50% On Track 7/1/95 - V LI I L Section 7 - Page 2 L1 Project Tracking Board Secretary 2 Measurement Projects <a 2 8E 8 C 1 E �z' sr 0 EI. Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled .e Measurement Tltte %Complete Status Stan End Streamline procedures for pmpanng agenda and minutes. 50% On Track 711/95 Provide regular updates of Director Info.to mgmt.and Committee sea. 50% On Track 7/1/95 - Communications 4 Measurement Projects yA 4 m m 3 Eel E I 0 Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled Measurement Title %Complete Status Stan End Establish and organize Communications Office. 95% On Track 711195 - ss Define Communka0ona Office Mission 8 develop work plan. 100% Done 7/1I95 12131195 Prepare Communications Office,Procedures Manual. 0% On Hold 711/95 - m Develop a biannual publication for public officials and comm.leaders. 0% On Hold 12/31/09 - Section 7 - Page 3 U Mid - Year Report Finance Administration 4 Measurement Projects L� r 4 u c 3 E 2 6d E z ° 1 f 0 Id Ahead On Tmok Done Behind Not Staled On Hold Canceled Measurement Thus %Complete Stetus Start End N Replace variable rate borrowing am arkefing agent to reduce costs. 100% Done 7/1/95 12/31/95 Complete implementation of treasury management lunpions. 100% Done 711/95 12/31/95 Yrl Prevlde sale,lquid and pmduchwo cash and investment program. 100% Done 1/ins SKJO/95 Improve comprehensive budget process staded in 199495. 30% On Track 7/195 5 [W95 L Accounting 3 Measurement Projects r 3 di `o 0 2 - E a i 'm 1 � r 0 Mead On Track Done Behind Net Shaded On Hold Canted r Measummant Title %Complete status Start End Overuse installation of a new Integrated Financial Into.System. 20% On Track 711/95 121J1/95 r Develop Dislnds'-wide Finance policy 8 plocetlure manual. 20% On Track 7/1/95 4rl0/95 Develop DismCs'-wide mmpmhensive budget manual. 50% On Tmck 7/1/95 12/31/95 r r U Section 7 - Page 4 u �. Project Tracking Purchasing & Warehousing 4 Measurement Projects 4 u a 3 E5 z R 1 s o Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled mr Measurement Title %Complete Status Stan End Compete revision of bidders list applic.to fie to commodity code listing. 85% On Track 7/1195 1/31/96 Establish annual contracts to reduce need for in-house inventory. 10% On Track 7/1/95 3/31M Establish ABC analysis for classifying and analyzing inventory. 80% On Track 1/1/95 3131196 Develop policy on removal of misc.low cost hardware from inventory. 10% Behind 711195 12/31/95 Information Technology Administration 4 Measurement Projects 4 d `o 3 E @! 2 ae s @ 1 E 0 Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled wa Measuremerk Title %Complete Status Stan End Develop Information Systems Master Plan 0% Behind 711195 - DevelopPerformanceMeasurementsurveyforlTDepartmentusers. 0% Behind 7/1195 - Obtainadequateworkingspace for IT Department stall. 5% On Track 7A/95 - eb Create formal Policies and Procedures Manual for IT Department. 0% Net Started 711195 - rn Section 7 - Page 5 Ii, Mid - Year Report L Hardware Support 3 Measurement Projects L L 3 JI `o p L E ' 1 z' m B L Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled Measurement Title %Complete Status Start End Install auxiliary PBX for Plant 2 to provide added telephone capabilities. 100% Done 711/95 12/31/95 Establish annual contracts to reduce need for in-house hrverdory. 75% Behind 711/95 1131/96 iy Establish ABC analysis for classifying and analyzing Inventory. 0% Not Started 1/1/95 6130/96 L Software & Plant Automation L 4 Measurement Projects LJ 4 `oc 3 1bI I E � 0 ' Ahead On Tuna Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled J Measurement Title %Complain Status Start End Provide software support for installation of new FIS. 0% Not Started 7/1195 - ReplacePlanlAutomationSyslem at Plant with new tachnology. 33% On Track 7/1/95 3/37/96 Install 0istricts-wide integrated network. 0% Not Stoned 711195 6/30196 6rl J L Section 7 - Page 6 LJ Project Tracking yr Human Resources Administration 3 Measurement Projects m s 3 o t 1 � m f 0 Ahead On Tral Done Behind Not Stoned On Hold Canceled Measurement This %complete Status start End ve Develop and implement a Dstmb-wide training pmgram. 80% On Tri 7H/95 - Develop and publish an Employee Handbook. 95% On Track 7/195 1I1S96 Improve Me quality of the Management Performance Review Program. 60% On Tmck T/M 5/3096 Human Resources & Training 3 Measurement Projects 3 de `o 2 B i Ahead On Tma Done Behind Not Slated On Hold Canceled m Measurement not %Complete Statue start End Develop and implement training opportunities and programs. 25% On Track 7I195 - �, Improve and mfine management and professional staff evaluations. 75% On Track 711195 - Conduct DSMcts♦vide attitude survey. 10D% Done 71195 - a, Safety & Emergency Response 3 Measurement Projects 3 _ 8 o c 2 Zm Ahead On T.& Done Behind Not Stanad On Hold Canceled Measurement Ties %Complete Status Start End o Develop safety training programs based on needs assessment 100% Done 711195 12/31/95 Develop and implement an integrated Emergency Response Plan. 10% On Track 7/195 - Conduct industrial hygiene evaluations to determine nazertls. 0% On HOM 7/195 Section 7 - Page 7 U Mid - Year Report Maintenance Administration 3 Measurement Projects i ] lad Sg y E L I ' 8 � � 1 z m f o J Ahead On Tretic Dore Behind Not Started On Mold Canceled Measumment Title %Complete status Start End L Emphasize preventive maintenance tasks to reduce life Cycle coats. 85% On Thai 7/1195 - Implement remaining Ernst S Young OW recommendations. 70% On Track 711195 - CondnuebuildingMecomputerdatabasefortha CMMS. 85% On Track 1/1/95 - - L U Maintenance Scheduling 2 Measurement Projects J z om L E L 1 � � J 0 Ahead On Trail Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled Mounurimend Title %Complete statue Start End Identify optimum prevenive maintenance rates to reduce costs. 50% On Thai 711/95 - I Benchmark equipment down tlme and establish acceptable lalpela. 50% On Trm* 711195 - V u - 4 Li Project Tracking Plant Maintenance 4 Measurement Projects e 3 `o °m 2 � � 1 z m f 0 Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Holed Canceled m Measurement Title %complete Status Start End Develop a valve exercising plaid maintenance program. 40% On Track 7/1195 6I30196 Develop a valve change plant maintenance program for critical areas. 15% Behind 7/1/95 6130196 m Investigate applicable certification program for the various crags. 25% Behind 7/1/95 6130196 Develop an area assignment sys.to leverage field crow resources. 20% Behind 711195 6130196 Collection Facilities Maintenance -� 4 Measurement Projects 4 3 n° @ 2 E � m d � 0 Ahead On Trade Dona Behind Not Slaked On Hold Canceled Measurement Title %compMae Oil" Start End Develop a CMMS data base for pump stations 8 a plant maint.listing. 70% Aheatl 711195 6130196 .e Continue to investigate ahemate chemicals for cheaper odor control. 60% On Track 711/95 Contract for line cleaning in some of the Disbids'Assmt.Districts. 60% On Trade 711/95 6130196 d Expand a root control program for District No.7 sewer system. 80% On Track 7/1/95 1/31/96 Section 7 -Page 9 Mid - Year Report L Mechanical Maintenance 3 Measurement Projects 1 V .i 3 E c > 2 _ E � 1 i c d b Ahead On Tmch Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled Menauramonl Ti %complete Stall Start End V Inhale linking program for mpelNve breakdowns of digester pumps. 50% On Trade 7/1/95 W30/96 Reduce costs by espani ing central generation engines maintenance. 75% Ahead 7/1195 - Smrt cross training of personnel between palms. 50% On Track 7/1d15 - Electrical Maintenance 4 Measurement Projects V V 4 B _ 2 � - E e 0 2 f 1 V 0 , i Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled I V Measurement Tills, %complete Stable Start End Complete CMMS database with regard to A/C systems. 95% Ahead 7H/95 M8/96 Develop predictive main.program for electdc equipment. 50% On Track 7/1/95 WW96 V Develop aI Kilovolt meter and relay database. 60% Ahead 7/1195 6/90M Privatize Central Generation Generator Maintenance to reduce costs. 100% Done 7/1195 11M/95 L/ V y Section 7 - Page 10 V Project Tracking Instrumentation Maintenance 3 Measurement Projects u 3 9 e E 2 a E ' 1 R f a 0 Ahead On Track Dona Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled Measurement Title %Complete stable start End Develop atlivity code within CMMS to tracit staff efforts. 2D% On Tmtl 711/95 MOW privatize maintenance services for the 13 Influent Row means. 95% Mead 7/t/95 313196 Develop a charting process for recording preventative meirtt.backlog. SO% Mead 7/195 1r3196 Technical Services Administration 4 Measurement Projects 4 r � EE3 2 r � 7 0 Mead On Track Done BehiM Ne Started On Hold Canceled Measurement Title %Complete stable Start End _ Improve coverage of legislation 8 improve assmt.of compliance regs. 100% Done 7/1/95 12J31/95 Develop Impinmnt teams&begin nnplemenhng EY recommendations. 75% On Track 711195 590M Develop compliance assmt.on discharges from treatment plants. 60% On Track 7/195 firso 6 e standardize biosolids inspection protocols S optimize staff usage. 75% On Track 7/195 313196 Section 7 - Page 11 L Mid - Year Report V Environmental Management 3 Measurement Projects L i 7 L E 2 @ V E 1 z f � Ahead On Tel Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled Measurement Title %Complete Status Start End Develop a 10-year synthesis of ocean moral program findings. 0% On Hold 711195 228/96 conduct a study of blotdckihtg fihers for the removal of pollutants. 65% On Track 7H/95 2128M Prepare a 1995 Air Toxlp Emission Inventory Plan and Report. 20% On Track 7/1/95 22B/g8 Ll L Environmental Sciences Laboratory 3 Measurement Projects V u 3 o1 , L E = � 1 � i inl 0 Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled Its, Measurement This %Complete statue Start End Develop expended air analysis capablldies 30% On Track 7/1195 - 1 Reduce labor coats for metals analyses of"Weasel 10% Behind 711195 - L Reduce labor cons for organic analyses ofwastewater. 10% Behind 711/5)5 - V U L Section 7 - Page 12 I ! v ® Project Tracking Source Control 3 Measurement Projects ® 3 _ 9 `o E p f 0 Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled Measurement Title %Complete Status Start End Evaluate the EPA Effluent Guidelines for regulating industrial users. 75% Ahead 7/1195 6130/96 Finalize the results of the non-industrial source sampling. 40% On Track 711/95 6130/96 Develop a program to regulate small-quantity dischargers. 50% On Track 711195 6rd0/96 a Operations Administration 3 Measurement Projects 3 ea Pl `o E 2 n° 1° m i a 1 m lE 0 Ahead On Track Dona Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled Measurement Title %Complete Status Start End m Reduced natural gas cost. NIA Ahead 711195 6/30196 Increase staff training. 70% Ahead 711195 6130/96 Improve employee communication. 100% Done 7/1195 6130196 m Section 76 - Page 13 L Mid - Year Report II V Plant Operations 4 Measurement Projects L a v n c c Z ! ! $ e V E w 1 —_ _— � m s? 0 e Ahead On Tract Done Behind Not Started On Hold Cancoletl Measurement This %Complete States Start End y Study staffing productivity per Ernst B Young review. 10% Not Started 71195 - Reduceovedlme. WA On Track 7/195 - Run Treatment plant cosWfecNey. WA On Tract 7/195 - logy Reduce biosolids disposal cost. WA Behind 7095 - Lai Engineering Administration 6 2 Measurement Projects 1 61 z a V ofE E z' o Id f 0 Ahead On Tra& Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled Measurement Title %Complete Statue Start End Moody Planning S Design organixation for E S Y recommendations 50% Behind 7/195 fir3096 jJ Implement all 14 recommendations In CIP Repon 00% Behind 7/195 - I✓ y� ICY Section 7 - Page 14 li Project Tracking Design Engineering 5 Measurement Projects 5 a a 'o 8 E 3 E 'm 2 i m 1 f s 0 Ahead On Track Done Behind Not StaMtl On Hold Canceled Measurement This %Complete status Sort End Complete75%of mnn permits in 1day,90%in 3 days, 100%in 5 WA On Tack 7/195 saom Design facilities which satisfy customer NIA On Tack 7/195 6/30M Track and manage$33.5 million CORF project budget WA On T.& 711/95 6/301% Comply with adopted Master Plan N/A On Track 7/195 6/7096 °f Improve submittal process on all new design projects N/A On Track 7/195 650/96 Engineering Planning 3 Measurement Projects m 3 e `o u 2 E E � 1 E 0 Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled Measurement Title %Complains Status Start End Comply with adopted Master Plan 50% On Track 711195 6130/96 Ttark and manage budget and schedule 50% On Track 7I195 6130/96 ® Update'as-buift'information 50% On Tack 711M 6130M Section 7 - Page 15 L L U L L+ u U u This page was intentionally left blank r l..i i Ytl Yi1 J u v u Section 7-Page 16 J I' COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California Finance Department Accounting Division (7141 962-2411 mailing address: P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92 7 2 8-8 1 27 sheet address: 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018 CSDOC 12195 SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 28, 1996 - 7:30 P.M. RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 4 Minute excerpts have been received as set forth below. Pursuant to Regular Agenda Item No. 4, it is appropriate to receive and file said excerpts: (4) (a) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive and file Resolution No. 96-8 from the Board of Supervisors re change in appointment of active and alternate representatives, as follows: Districts Active Director Alternate Director 1, 2, 3, & 11 Roger R. Stanton William G. Steiner 5, 6, 7, 13 & 14 William G. Steiner Roger R. Stanton (b) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept resignation of Mayor Joseph S. Barsa of the City of Villa Park from the Board of Directors of District No. 2, and seating first and second alternates to the mayor, as follows: District Active Director Alternate Director 2 Barry L. Denes Bob Bell (c) Consideration of motion to receive and file any minute excerpts received subsequent to preparation of supplemental agenda, if any J:iwvooc=wGs A.W uw OFFICES or ROURBE, WOODRU77 & SPRADLIN �e...BRDe •'"'O'm"�""�m'^�'"`�' >ew+wMc nle,Bae>000 KART E.enneD SUITE 7000 r eaMl:E n im ego->>e> N' Lae 701 SOUTH PARKER STREET BEFIT G.BUR16R AM.E.uvwwWM ORAMOE. CALIFORNIA 020E8 GMW O. .MwNDTO.FICAwRnER'D DIRECT DIAL NUMBER RI86L R. IGI[[..KIF11[T TNOYAe I. .u.ea o. ROVRaG KaBue K. [wn,+R. o.wrt I. eNvc[ Q191559'2616 January 12, 1996 � Ta TMowe L..00enNrr VIA FACSIMILE AND U.S. MAIL Mack J. Travers, Esq. Via Facsimile - (713) 492-8567 TRAVERS & TRAVERS 20501 Katy Freeway Suite 124 Katy, Texas 77450 Mr. John A. Bannon, Jr., J.D. Via Facsimile - (713)961-9819 Underwriters Settlement Services 8 Greenway Plaza, Suite 400 Houston, TX 77046 Joe B. Cordil, Jr., Esq. Via Facsimile - (318) 798-7580 8660 Fern Avenue, Suite 100 Shreveport, LA 71105 Charles I. Eisner, Esq. Via Facsimile - (510) 639-1897 BOORNAZIAN, JENSEN & GARTHE P.O. Box 12925 Oakland, CA 94604-2925 Mark Fall, Esq. Via Facsimile - (213)485-1200 LORD, BISSELL & BROOK 300 South Grand Ave., 8th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071-3200 Re: Costa, at al. v. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California Dear Mssrs. and Madames: This letter shall serve as our final demand for payment of attorneys' fees and costs incurred in the above-entitled matter. As you may be aware, demands for payment have been previously made upon Guardian Royal Exchange and Underwriters Settlement Services, Inc., but they have gone unanswered. At this time, if we do not receive payment of the outstanding fees and costs owed on behalf of our client, County Sanitation Districts r January 12, 1996 Page 2 of Orange County, we will have no choice but to proceed with litigation to enforce your fiduciary duty to pay the costs of litigation and attorneys' fees. An action will be filed pursuant to the contract, as well as, for breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealings. Presently, outstanding attorneys' fees and costs which are due and payable to Rourke, Woodruff& Spradlin in the amount of$28,734.05. All of these fees were incurred post-tender. In addition, the amount of$48.844.21 is owed to County Sanitation Districts of Orange County for fees previously paid by them. These fees are both post and pre- tender fees. In previous correspondence, dated July 10, 1995, Mr. Travers has questioned Rados Company's insurers obligation for payment of pre-tender costs, citing policy language addressing voluntary payments. Please be advised that this issue is specifically addressed in the case of Fiorito v. Sup, Ct. (1990) 226 Cal. App. 3d 433, and the Court determined that the standard policy provisions prohibiting an insured from making voluntary payments or incurring expenses did not, as a matter of law, preclude the insured from recovering pre- tendered defense costs. Certainly, when an insured is at risk of losing legal rights unless it hires counsel to protect its interest, the payments to their attorney do not constitute voluntary payments. In addition, the tender in this case was filed in a timely manner and there was no prejudice to any insurer. Therefore, in the absence of bad faith, there is no reason why an insurer would not recognize their obligations to pay the entire fees and costs due and owing at this time both to Rourke, Woodruff & Spradlin and the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California. Furthermore, in Mr. Travers' most recent correspondence of July 10, 1995, he alludes to the fact that the fees charged by Rourke, Woodruff & Spradlin somehow exceeded the normal rate for defense insurance counsel. We provided him information indicating that assertion was inaccurate. Regardless, the fees charged by Rourke, Woodruff & Spradlin were agreed to when counsel was retained by Guardian Royal Exchange Insurance Company to provide a defense for County Sanitation District of Orange County. In fact, after having been provided months of billings detailing the attorney fees in this case, on January 14, 1994, Mr. Floyd A. Wisner confirmed as follows: "Of course, Guardian Royal will pay all future reasonable fees and expenses of your firm in defending the County Sanitation District in this matter." Fees were paid without any concern expressed for the rates charged until July 10, 1995. Obviously, these are simply bad faith tactics to renege on an obligation owed to your insured, County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. 2M7aoom zaiso 1 January 12, 1996 Page 3 Enclosed with this letter you will find the most recent statements from June 30, 1995 to and including December 31, 1995. If we do not hear from you before 5:00 p.m, on January 19, 1996, we will assume that you will continue to withhold payment in bad faith and proceed to protect the interests of County Sanitation Districts with court intervention. Cordially, ROURKE, WOODRUFF & SPRADLIN CRAIG G. F ROdNGTT Enclosures cc: Mr. D. F. McIntyre Mr. G. G. Streed Ms. P. Kyle Thomas L. Woodruff, Esq. 203]-00000 23180_1 it I lEugNalea 8AWNA Date:30-Jan-96 007282 r UotlerRriters Settlement Services, Inc. S,01m tAeeoam eaee4HAr rmrA� USS Cheek Number: 003197L S Gem+ y pin Sure 400 �' S HouvoRTX 71046 ]i ttSenO Par to the order of: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 548,844.21 THE EXACT SUM OF: •..48,844 DOLLARS and TI CENTS'.. FOR: REIMBURSEMENT OF LEGAL FEES INCURRED BY THE ORANGE COUNTY.CALIFORNIA,SANITATION DISTRICTS a„yaw, t7.saaao i rw rau my. 11*00P2621" 1: L14001L501: 002300049i06�' nn Payee Number : - - 0 FOR: REIMBURSEMENT OF LEGAL FEES INCURRED BY THE ORUE7282 COUNTY,CALIFORNIA,SANITATION DISTRICTS USS Check Number : 003197 L Policy Effective Date : 31-Mar-91 USS File Number : 391 MC180-058 Policy Number Insured : RADOS, INC. Amount Paid : S48,844.21 Incident Date : 01-Apr-91 1990 uo'r282 Underwriters Settlement Senlces, Inc S Ge .Y Plaza Suite 400 Hou Tc= T 046 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY In e ARLWARREN&CO. Next Report Due: 3-96 Claims Management and Administration 250 TM(:iry Miw Saito 400 Orangq CA 92669 Mail:P.O.0na 25190 Santa Ana.CA 92799 5190 (714)740-n99 eae,p714)740J992 February 28, 1996 FIRST REPORT - INVESTIGATION County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Attention: Penny Kyle RE: Principal : County Sanitation Districts of Orange County D/Incident : 2-22-96 Claimants : Donna Anderson, at al. Our File No. : Undetermined Ladies and Gentlemen: PREVIEW: These claims . result from a sewer backup caused by a pump station failure which flooded approximately seventeen homes in the Newport Beach area. PRINCIPAL: County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. DATE. TIME & PLACE: During the early morning hours on February 22, 1996 along Harbor Island Drive, Bayside Drive and Beacon Bay, Newport Beach, California. FACTS IN BRIEF: It has been determined that a District pump station shut down causing excess amounts of sewage water to back up into the system causing approximately 36,000 gallons of sewage from three manholes to flow into the storm drain system and into Newport Bay along with approximately 5,000 gallons of sewage into homes bordering the bay. GOVERNMENT CODE COMPLIANCE: To date, we have not received any official claims from any of the homeowners but the claim forms are currently being distributed to the effected homeowners. ^r Page 2 CLAIMANT VERSIONS: The claimants were all consistent in the fact that they either heard or smelled sewage emulating from their bathroom either from their shower stall, bathtub or commode. DISTRICT VERSION: According to reports received from the District, it was determined that the pump station failed due to a mounting bracket support which had corroded allowing the level sensor to break and cause the pipe to fall and separate the air supply from the pipe assembly. The wet well level bubbler system sensors control the pumps which registered low water levels in the wet well causing the pumps to cease operation. After reports to the City of Newport Beach from a homeowner at approximately 3:00 A.M. , staff from the City of Newport Beach Water Utilities Department determined that the Bay Bridge Pump Station was not functioning and they cut the gate and door padlocks and made entrance into the station manually turning on the PUMPS- The spill stopped shortly after the pumps were started. PREMISES: We have inspected fourteen out of the seventeen homes that were effected. Several of the homeowners indicated that their damages were minor and they cleaned the area up themselves. We will outline each respective homeowner and their damages in the ^Property Damage - Claimants" section. PHOTOGRAPHS: Numerous photographs were taken of each residence which will be mounted and labeled with our next report. PROPERTY DAMAGE - CLAIMANTS: 1. Donna and Larry Anderson: loll Bayside Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660, phone (714)760-1656. The Anderson residence was by far and away the most heavily damaged and most eloquently appointed home that was effected by the sewage backup. The home had interior damage to the master bedroom and bathroom, living room and den area. Page 3 The home had a total remodel approximately three years ago at a cost of $200,000.00, according to the homeowner. The homeowner states that the interior redesign was done by a designer by the name of Mr. Fari which took approximately nine months to complete. The home is currently without carpeting and arrangements are being made to relocate the claimants to another residence while the repairs are being completed. We are in the process of - locating a contractor which will do a partial disassembling of the home so bacterial evaluation can be made by Clayton Environmental Consultants. Some personal property was damaged in the sewer backup, including approximately forty pairs of designer-type shoes owned by the claimant and several articles of clothing owned by her husband. We believe considerable negotiation will be required to resolve this claim since there will be numerous items of contention as we proceed through the rebuilding process. We believe the main item of contention will be the marble floors and marble- lined shower stall which the claimant believes is ruined as a result of the sewage backflow. We will be attempting to obtain an expert's opinion as to the likelihood of the marble being sanitized and re-polished to its original condition. Initial Reserve - $75, 000.00. 2 . Godelio Friedstadt: 1005 Bayside Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660, phone (714) 760-3906. This home sustained moderate damage to the master bedroom and bathroom. We noted no personal property damage as a result of the backflow. The home had a moderate grade of carpeting and the owner is currently performing the repairs. They will be submitting a claim within the very near future. Initial Reserve - $2, 500.00. Page 4 3. Helene Winocura: 1013 Bayside Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660, phone (714)760-1609. This residence sustained damage to the master bedroom and master bath area. The claimant indicated that she may replace the carpeting in the living room and dining room due to the heavy contamination they believe occurred when the cleaning crews walked through the home to do their repairs. The carpeting was approximately five years old according to the homeowner and was of very good grade. Also damaged were approximately twelve pairs of ladies' shoes. Initial Reserve - $7,500.00 4. William white: 1017 Bayside Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660, phone (714)720-1640. This home sustained damage to the master bedroom and bath along with the living room, den and wood entry hall. The owners are residents of Hawaii with this being a second home. We met with the executive secretary for the owner, Terry Magee. The carpeting in the home was four months old having recently been replaced. It was a moderate grade Berber throughout. There were several damaged personal property items, including some shoes and some boots which Ms. Magee indicated cost $1, 100.00. Initial Reserve - $6,500.00. S. Unknown Owner: 1021 Bayside Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660. We presented ourself at the owner's residence on the day of the backup. We received no answer but understand that the damage was confined to the bathroom fixtures only. We have not received a phone call from the owner of the property. Initial Reserve - $500.00. Page 5 6. Don Madison: 973 Bayside Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660. We met with the owner who indicated that he had awoken early that morning and saw the sewage water entering his bathtub. He was able to effectively scoop out the contaminated water with a bucket and drained it to the outside of his residence. He had no damages as a result of this backup. Initial Reserve - Zero. 7 . Ms. Barker: 979 Bayside Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660, phone (714) 720-9571. This claimant sustained minor damage to her bathroom and master bedroom. The master bedroom carpet consisted of a white shaggy carpet over a custom wood floor. The wood floor did not appear to be damaged upon our inspection. There was no personal property damaged as a result of this backup. Initial Reserve - $2,500.00. S. Paulene Johnston: 981 Bayside Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660, phone (714) 640-1819. This home sustained a backup into the master bedroom and bathroom along with minor penetration into the living room, den and entryway. The home had a high grade blue carpeting which may be difficult to match in the other rooms. The flooring in the den and entry hall consisted of wood floors which were effected by the backup. The carpeting in the home was approximately six years old and was in very good condition. Also damaged were two Oriental rugs which the home indicated that she will attempt to salvage since they were bought overseas. There may be some furniture touch-up to two pieces of furniture in the master bedroom. Initial Reserve - $10,000. 00. Page 6 9. Dr. Manchester: 985 Bayside Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660, phone (714)675-8647 and (714)645-3040. The owner of this residence was not available during our inspection. The cleanup crew was there attending to the backup after they were given a key from a neighbor. The master bedroom and bathroom were effected by the backup along with seepage from the master bedroom to the living room. The carpeting consisted of a high grade Berber carpet which appeared to be relatively new. There were also several pieces of furniture which were soaked with sewage water. Initial Reserve - $5,000.00. 10. Unknown Owner: 989 Bayside Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660. We contacted this residence and there was no one home on the day of the backup. We have not heard anything from this particular homeowner. Initial Reserve - $2,500.00. 11. Mr. and Mrs. Turner: 409 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660, phone (714)675-5582. This private residence sustained damage to a living room, hall, master bedroom, a second bedroom and a rear storage room. The home was carpeted with a medium to low grade cut-pile carpeting that was approximately ten years old according to the homeowner. Most of the furniture in the residence looked like it was not effected by the water backup. Most of the furnishings in the home were older and of relatively marginal quality. Initial Reserve - $5,000.00. 12. J.D. Lincoln: 415 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660. t Page 7 We met with the owner who had moderate damage to two bedrooms and two bathrooms. The home had an average quality carpet which looked several years old. The owner was extremely cooperative during our visit. initial Reserve - $2,500.00. 13. Unknown Owner: 421 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660. We spoke to this owner from a distance who indicated that only the bathroom was effected by the backup and she cleaned it up herself. We did not inspect the residence since we were advised that no claim would be filed. Initial Reserve - Zero. 14. Dr. Martin Litke: 427 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660. This home had very minor damage to the bathroom and hall only. A cleanup crew was conducting the work upon our inspection. Initial Reserve - $1, 500.00. 15. Unknown Owner: 433 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660. We attempted to make contact with the owner but they were not there on the day of the backup. We understand from the Fire Department that the damages were reserved to the outside of the residence only. Initial Reserve - $500.00. 16. Alex Fishman: 439 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660, phone (714) 675-2393 and (310) 273-2373. This home is a weekend-only home for the resident. The home sustained moderate damage to the master bedroom and bath along with two other side bedrooms and two other side bathrooms. Page 8 The carpet consisted of a high grade wool Berber carpeting in two of the bedrooms and a moderate grade cut-pile carpeting in the master bedroom. There were several throw rugs which were damaged but no other personal property. The owner was extremely cooperative during our visit. Initial Reserve - $5,000.00. 17. R.C. Fuller: 443 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660. There was no one home upon our visit with a note to contact the owner should the Fire Department require any other inspection of the property. We are attempting to contact the owner to determine the extent of damage. Initial Reserve - $2,500.00. 18. Harry Crowell: 554 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660, phone (714)263-3340. This home was approximately 100 yards away from the other residences which were effected. The backup originated from the laundry room drain and emulated to the living room, kitchen and hallway. The home had a very high quality carpeting that was two years old along with a high quality linoleum flooring in the kitchen. One piece of furniture appeared to be effected by the backup but the three couches in the living room were untouched. There was some penetration on the lower edges of some oak wall units. They appeared to need minor disinfection and cleaning. World Restoration was doing the restoration work to this residence. Initial Reserve - $7,500.00. 19. Unknown owner: 44 Beacon Bay, Newport Beach, CA 92660. l Page 9 We attempted to make contact with the owner who was not there. We understand that the only damages to this residence consisted of streaks to the shower wall and tub area. Initial Reserve - $500.00. LIABILITY EVALUATION: With the facts in our possession, we believe this to be a liability situation toward the Orange County Sanitation Districts at this time. We also acknowledge that there may be contributory negligence on the property manager of the condominium complex located on Bayside Drive since a pumping station which was on the residence was not being maintained properly and may have alleviated the backup had it been working properly. Further investigation is being performed for any potential subrogation at a later time. We also believe that several of the homes may have had backflow valves which were not working properly on the day in question. Further investigation may be required to determine comparative negligence on these homes. WORK TO BE COMPLETED: Await filing of claims from the homeowners and attempt resolution of each claim accordingly. COMMENTS: Our work on this matter continues and our further report will follow in several weeks. Very truly yours, CARL WARREN & CO. Edward Garbo lw'/ EG:mcw �.F7.lL Gn e19 G The News Pipe liine County Sanitation Districts of Orange County "Protecting the Public Health and Environment Through Excellence in Wastewater Systems" Volume 3,No.4 February 28,1996 Values Committee Publishes Other comments stressed that we must keep communication lines open across all departments,and Questionnaire Results that we must show pride and concern for each The Values Committee Working Group, consisting department, not just for isolated divisions or of Chuck Lee, Simon Watson and Jeff Reed, has individuals. It is critical that we all set good examples, published the results of the Values Committee and that discipline is used only after an objective and questionnaire that addressed the issues of increasing honest evaluation has revealed a violation of our trust and confidence, removing hidden agendas and terms, conditions, rules or regulations of employment. eliminating retaliation. Here's their report: We found that, overall, opinions were in the middle of the road, but there still seems to be some core The members of the Values Committee want to problems in many departments. Examples include thank everyone who took the time to respond to the lack of managerial and supervisory support, questionnaire, especially those who made written favoritism, incompetency, lack of promotion comments.Taking an active interest, and participating opportunities, "political correctness" instead of good in the work environment are among the most essential judgment, lack of accountability at all levels, and little and meaningful things employees contribute to the recognition for "a job well done." There was also a success of an organization. concern that management often does not treat and The first thing we did was tally the employee represent employees fairly and honestly. responses to questions that contained the following The survey indicated that there is support for selections: Never, Rarely, Sometimes, Most of the change within the organization. Employees said that Time, and Always. Then, in the interest of they want to work in an environment where they can confidentiality, we categorized the written comments be confident that trust and honesty are not only values into a general set of responses. These responses are but also realities. Above-board and honest summarized in this report and will be posted soon on communication was the key factor stressed in the the bulletin boards for your review. Please feel free to responses. If we are going to be a responsible provide additional feedback or ask questions of the organization that embraces a recognized set of core Values Committee members about this information. values, then teamwork is essential for us to attain our The Values Committee intends to do a follow-up-in common goals and mission. approximately six months. Another predominant response was that trust and In general, the people who responded to the confidence in our work environment can only evolve survey represent all levels and all departments. Some and survive when all employees, irrespective of their people said that they have experienced problems with position or level of authority, accept that we all must trust and confidence, hidden agendas and retaliation. identify, practice and preserve the values and However, there was a general feeling that progress commitments that encompass the"Guiding Principles" has been made to minimize such incidents. that reflect our core values. (Note: Our Guiding At the Feb. 15 meeting of the Values Committee, Principles were just finalized and will be formally our working group recommended that we ask the presented to employees in the next few weeks.) Human Resources and Training Division and the It is of utmost importance that our organizational Communications Division to develop and provide polices reflect these principles and that all of us managerial, supervisory and lead-person training to adhere to them. Successful change can only come improve communication skills to specifically address about through continuous training and consistent these problems. direction in policy. Each individual must be Many people said that progress can and is being accountable for how well we succeed in this made toward increasing trust and confidence in the endeavor. First-line supervisors must clearly identify workplace. However, if it is to continue, managers and issues that come up in the workplace and inform supervisors must communicate honestly and executive management so that it can respond quickly ethically to all their employees. Furthermore, and appropriately. managers and supervisors must keep all employees Most of all, competent leadership is essential to informed about issues facing our organization. identify and implement policies and programs that 1 reflect this dedication.These policies must support our everyone's part to make it happen. We accomplished common purpose and mission to ensure the continued this feat by getting the cooperation of workers on 12- i excellence of the Districts as an organization. hour shifts, through staffs willingness to plan their ; vacation schedules in advance, by reducing minimum ` 12-hour Shift Survey staffing levels, by using the Districts' personal leave The Values Committee would like to thank buy-back policy, and because of everyone's everyone who has completed and fumed in their 12- willingness to minimize unscheduled leave. hour-shift survey. If you haven't turned in your 1994, due to the lack of same of the above survey yet, please do so as soon as possible. If you factors, one hour of overtime was required for every didn't get one to till out, contact Greg Chesebro, ext. three hours one hour overtime for every time off. In 7.5 hours of time off. Here of 5, that ratio changed to 5922, Moira Sullivan, ext. 2058, or Matt Eddy, ext. 3058. Preliminary results from the replies we have are the numbers: received so far have been distributed to everyone who In 1994,the Plant No.2 of leave staff asked for took the survey. and received of overtime hours of leave which required 6,252 hours of overtime to cover. In 1995, staff received 14,870 hours ofleave which required only 2,001 hours of overtime. Our goal for 1996 is to Joint Boards Approve reduce this number even further. Landfill Acquisition Bid At a special meeting on Feb. 14, the Districts' CWEA Industrial and Joint Boards of Directors voted to submit an offer Hazardous Waste Conference to the county that would transfer the ownership and operation of the Orange County solid waste Associate Engineer III Jane Tran from the Source management system to a new sanitation district. If Control Division made a presentation titled, the offer is approved by the Orange County Board "Permitting Issues for Metal Finishing and of Supervisors and all term-sheet conditions are Electroplating Category Dischargers—What to Look for agreed upon, a new sanitation district board would and What's Ahead" at the 23rd California Water Environment Association (CWEA) be created comprising a representative from each Industrial and Hazardous Waste city or sanitary district in the county, and a Conference in Los Angeles on Feb. member of the Board of Supervisors. 13. Jane's talk was part of day-long The funds for the acquisition—$300 million over session on industrial operator training 20 years — would probably come from a capital for wastewater pretreatment systems. financing program that would be secured by Jane focused on how we revenues generated by the waste management determine if a company should be in system. No CSDOC funds will be used. the metal finishing or electroplating category, and the Before the deal can become final, Orange difference between "category" and "permitted" County cities must commit to bringing at least 90 discharge limits. She talked about the different types percent of the solid waste generated in the county of permit limits (mass and concentration), self to the system for the next 20 years. This will monitoring and notification requirements for provide the long-term stability upon which the new permittees, the importance of proper record keeping district can make economic projections and future and reporting, and different types of permit conditions. debt payments. The Board of Supervisors must She concluded by discussing the overall impact of also agree to the proposed terms and conditions the new proposed EPA Metal Products and Machinery of the transfer. (MP&M)category of dischargers on specific industries The term sheet is currently under review by the in our service area, typical MP&M unit operations, and County Chief Administrative Officer Jan Mittemi he the proposed effluent limitations for this category. ty Efficient, well-operated industrial wastewater Once she has completed her review, she will forward pretreatment plants are the key to our successful her recommendations to the Board of Supervisors. source control program. Through efforts like We'll keep you apprised of developments. participating at the CWEA conference, and by keeping up on the most recent changes in the regulatory Overtime Reduced at Plant No. 2 arena, the Districts' Source Control Division is able to By Doug Cook help industries meet their permit limits, which in turn I'm happy to report that the Plant No. 2 Operations helps us maintain the viability of our environmental was able to reduce overtime at Plant No. 2 by 68% in protection programs. 1995 from 1994. It really took a group effort on 2 Get Ready for Performance Tunnicliff and Milled Management Training! Pass PE Exam By Dawn McKinley Congratulations to Dan �i �ORIQ Performance Management Tunnleliff of the Safety and 2 training for Division managers, Emergency Response Division executive staff, supervisors and Kathleen Millea of the and professionals will be held Operations Division who were from Apr. 29 through May 7. just notified that they passed the Professional Engineer Managers and supervisors will (PE) exam and have become professional civil attend one-day training engineers. Added congratulations go to Intern sessions from April 29 through May 2, and members Anthony Howard who just learned that he passed the of the professional group will have half-day sessions Engineer in Training (EIT) exam. on May 5, 6 and 7. All affected employees will be To become a registered engineer you have to be receiving more details by the end March. an EIT, work for three years under a registered Training will cover the fundamentals of engineer, and of course, you have to pass the PE performance management including the performance exam. management process, the new performance review forms, the new automated performance management Orange County Freeway system, techniques on how to evaluate employee Service Patrol performance and communicate desired performance Did you know that a special results, and methods for establishing, evaluating and - team of tow trucks is traveling on rating performance objectives and developing selected Orange County performance measures. freeways during commuter hours Training is mandatory, so mark your calendars to assist drivers when their cars now! Please contact Dawn McKinley, ext. 2108 if you s break down?The program is part have any questions. of an overall plan to improve transportation throughout Orange More Babies in the News!! County and keep the freeways moving. The program Congratulations to Arnold is being funded by the State of California and the 44�1and JIII Chavez on the birth of Orange County Transportation Authority. The"FREE" their first child, a baby girl Freeway Service Patrol operates Monday through named Lauren Elizabeth, who Friday, 5:30 a.m. to 9:30 a.m. and 3 p.m. to 7 p.m. on joined the Chavez household at most freeways. 8:37 a.m. on Feb. 19. Lauren If you get stuck on the freeway because your car weighed 6 Ibs, 10 oz, and was stops running, the Freeway Patrol can: 19%inches long. Arnold is a Regulatory Specialist in a Offer you a gallon of gas the Technical Services Support Group and Jill is a e Jump start your dead battery Senior Clerk with the Design Engineering Division. a Refill your radiator and tape broken hoses A special congratulations goes out to Norma and a Even change a flat tirel Ricardo Leopando on the birth of their daughter If they can't get your car going, it will be towed free Uses, who arrived on Feb. 15 at 11:15 a.m. Lissa of charge to a location approved by the California weighed 7 Ibs, 5 oz and was 18 inches long. Norma Highway Patrol. Call (714) 724-2747 for more is a Sr. Lab Analyst with the Technical Services information. Department. The reason that Lissa's birth is so special is that even though the Leopando's really wanted a girl, h rcas Ted E. Hoffman Purchasing they were told by Norma's doctor during her g pregnancy that ultrasound test showed that she was Building Dedication going to have another son. The Leopando's already All employees are invited to attend a ceremony have two boys, ages 9 and 11. In fact she was so dedicating the Purchasing Building to the memory of sure she was going to have another boy (and quite Ted. E. Hoffman, long-time Districts' Purchasing happy as well), all the gifts at her shower were for a Manager who died suddenly last Nov. 11 of a heart boy baby. attack. The Purchasing Building dedication ceremony Imagine the Leopondo's surprise (not to mention will take place on Thursday, March 7, at 10 a.m. the doctor's), when Lissa arrived! Mother and baby are doing fine. 3 Daffodil Days Fundraiser District next door to Plant No. 1 to survey their Lynn Elliott, the Districts' employees to see if together we can make it , contact person for the American worthwhile.On a side note, it seems that there was a ` AMERICAN Cancer Society's Daffodil Days misunderstanding by a few employees who took the �2CCACNCER fundraiser says that we have survey. If a child-care service is ever offered, it would already received over$200 worth not be a benefit but would be an employee-sponsored of orders during the first week of program. the campaign. All orders must be in to Lynn no later than this Friday, March 1. Make all checks payable to How to Plan An the American Cancer Society. Call Lynn, ext. 5079, if you have any questions. Effective Presentation Here's an invitation to jump at the Hockey Game Post Script opportunity to attend the Graphic Users By Flo Gerdes Group (GUG) meeting on Leap Year A total of 44 employees, Day, Feb. 29, from 2 to 3 p.m. in the friends and family had a great Board Room. Learn how to plan an �— time at the Arrowhead Pond effective presentation. Learn how on Jan. 31 watching the Graphic Services can help you become rr~• Mighty Ducks of Anaheim the great communicator you arel Q beat the first place Colorado Avalanche. Miriam Loyo, Division p Service Awards Q 3580, won a T-shirt, cap and The following employees celebrated their service hockey puck in the group drawing. But Bill Aldridge, Division 2220, came away anniversaries during the last pay period. the big winner, being the only person in the sell-out Congratulations! crowd selected to win a watch and a hockey stick Ten Years autographed by the entire Mighty Ducks team. He also Cesar Sandulescu Collections Inspection won tickets to the final home game of the season Five Years where he will be one of 39lucky people who will have Bob Ortega Warehouse a chance at winning a 1996 Toyotal Dean Yokoyama Operations Bill hadn't originally planned on attending the *New Employees* game, but got his tickets earlier that day from Director The following new employee joined the agency of Operations Bob Ooten who had a conflict that evening. Bob had gotten his tickets from Assistant since the last pay period. Welcome to the Districts! • SonjaKlick—Intern General Manager for Operations Blake Anderson a Environmental Management week or so before the game after Blake discovered that he too couldn't go to the game. *Promotions* How about if we plan on going to another Mighty Congratulations to the following employees who Ducks game next year? were promoted during the last pay period. Michelle Fitzgerald From: Assoc. Engineer II 3410 Maintenance News To: Assoc. Engineer III 3410 The recently completed Customer Questionnaires Chuck Windsor sent out from the Maintenance Department have been From: Senior Engineer 3720 received and the results are being tallied. Ed Hodges TO: Engineering Supervisor 3720 would like to thank everyone who participated for their valuable input. As soon as we have the results, we'll publish them in The News Pipeline. The News Pipeline Marcin reports that the Districts' Preliminary Child Care Survey resulted in a very The News Pipeline is published every payday by the positive response. Though most respondents were in Communications civismn for the employees and Directors ofMe favor of the idea of having a child care facility On-Site Orange County Sanitation Districts.The deadline for submitung 9 ty news items is ft Wednesdav before payday.Contributions are or nearby, there are not enough children of Districts' weioomal employees who would be enrolled full time to sponsor h such a facility.We've asked the Orange County Water Editor.........................'"'..'""'....""..""..""."".""""'rate`s`MCNeIry 4 DATE PAID 1/24/96 1130196 2/7/96 ➢i.i. DIFIRI= Joint Operating Fund - 330,891.89 1,984.69 1,097,537.60 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 716,314.33 100.00 377,866.63 Joint Working Capital Fund - 508,946.57 0.00 183,218.02 Self-Funded Insurance Fonda - 3,511.49 8,582.81 63,272.44 OIAMiM NO. 1 - 92.60 0.00 443.50 DISTRICT Nn_ 1 - 1,3D5.61 0.00 5,033.49 OiSIRICI NO. 3 - 500,455.26 0.00 423,915.28 DISIRICT NO. 5 - 477.07 0.00 12,802.61 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 69.20 0.00 252.84 ❑3RIRicr NO_ I - 312,659.59 0.00 62,180.89 DIRTRFCT NO. 11 - 10,463.03 0.00 195,154.05 DISTRICT NO. 13 - 3.40 0.00 0.00 Di9IRF[ NO. 14 - 764.81 0.00 17.05 DISTRICTS NO, 1 6 0 JOINT 0.00 0.00 0.00 DISTRICTS NO. 3 6 11 JOINT 875.00 0.00 DAD DISTRICTS NO. 5 6 6 JOINT - 678.04 0.00 172,537.30 DISTRTCTB NO. 6 s ] JOINT - 213.30 0.00 2,258.68 DISTRICTS NO. T A 14 JOINT - 15.98 0.00 6,341.96 TOTALS 2,387,767.10 10,667.50 2,602,740.34 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0122/96 PAGE i REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0124/96 POSTING DATE 01/24/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 149482 A-1 FENCE CO INC. $797.00 GATE REPAIR 149483 AG TECH COMPANY $50,243.52 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.ID-9-91 149464 ASL CONSULTING ENGINEERS $1,028.74 ATWOOD SUBTRUNK PLAN PREPARATION 149485 ASRANALYSIS $1,500.00 LAB SERVICES 149456 ATM AA,INC. $1,160.00 LAB SERVICES 149487 AT&T-MEGACOM SERVICE $5,453.96 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 149488 AT&T-MEGACOM SERVICE $2,903.40 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 149489 AT&T-CELLULAR CR&R $6.10 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 149490 ACORN CONSULTING S2,730.00 CONSULTING SERVICES 149491 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS,INC. S2,563.00 CONSTRUCTION P1-36-1 149492 AIR LIQUIDE AMERICA CORP. $1,247.69 SPECIALTY GASSES 149493 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $18,322.00 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.0.8-9A9 149494 ALADDIN HOUSE $350.45 WINDOW BLINDS 149495 AMERIDATA $1,280.82 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 149496 AMERICAN AIR FILTER,INC. $1.826.36 MECHANICAL PARTS 149497 AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION $86.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 149498 AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE $317.81 CHEMICALS 149499 APA EDUCATION TRUST $2.055.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING 149500 APCO VALVE&PRIMER CORP. $1.912.56 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 149501 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $3,420.60 NOTICES&ADS 149502 APPLE ONE $5.962.00 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 149503 ADS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $8,714.05 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 149504 AQUATIC BIOASSAY&CONSULTANTS $5.475.00 LABORATORY SERVICES 149505 ARROWHEAD ELECTRIC CORP. $416.21 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 1495DS ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE,INC. $931.20 TOXIC WASTE REMOVAL 149507 AMSA $425.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 149508 AURORA PUMP $37.00 PUMP PARTS 1495D9 RANDOLPH AUSTIN CO. $576.10 LAB SUPPLIES 149510 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $3.11M.66 PAYROLL SERVICES 149511 BFI MEDICAL WASTE SYSTEMS $46.05 WASTE DISPOSAL 149512 E S BABCOCK&SONS INC $1,140.00 LAB ANALYSIS 149513 BAKER INSTRUMENT CO $25,019.95 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 149514 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $608.57 BATTERIES 149515 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $2,892.37 LABSUPPUES 149516 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $154.30 TRUCK WASH TICKETS 149517 BIOSOLIOS RECYCLERS OF SO CAL $1.000.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES 149518 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $18,143.47 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-1-2 149519 BRENNER-FIEDLER&ASSOC.,INC. $101.84 GENERATORS 149520 BUSH&ASSOCIATES,INC. $4,652.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.641-94 149521 CCI TECHNOLOGIES $527.00 SPLICE CABLES 149522 C.C.S.C.E. $210.11 PUBLICATION 149523 CEM CORPORATION $7,300.40 LAB SUPPLIES 149524 CHI HILL $10.806.20 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-31 149525 CALFON CONSTRUCTION $306,091.66 CONSTRUCTION 7-22&7-24 149526 CALTROL,INC. $1,231.05 HARDWARE 149527 CALIF ASSOC.OF SAN.AGENCIES $120.00 WORK CONFERENCE REGISTRATION FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 01/2V96 PAGE2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 01/24/96 POSTING DATE 01124M WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 149528 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $85.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 149529 CALTEX PLASTICS,INC. $1.064.72 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 149530 CAMALI CORP. $3.625.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 149531 CAPITALWESTWARD $223.71 MECHANICAL PARTS 149532 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $17,762.25 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-15-2 149533 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $1,337.14 ENGINEERING SERVICES MO 8-23-95 149534 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $699.18 OFFICE FURNITURE 149535 MICHAEL A CHAMP $6,500.00 OCEAN MONITORING 149536 CHROME CRANKSHAFT,INC. $720.00 PUMP PARTS 149537 CLEMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL $12,572.67 CONSULTANT-LANDFILL PROJECT MO 7-31-95 149538 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $11.191.23 ELECTRIC PARTS 149539 CONSUMER PIPE $1,287.02 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 149540 CONTINENTAL EQUIP B SUPPLY $16.52 TOOLS 149541 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $715.46 ENGINE PARTS 149542 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $346.10 TRUCK PARTS 149643 COVEY LEADERSHIP CENTER $558.00 SUBSCRIPTION 149544 CHARLES P.CROWLEY,CO. $369.24 INSTRUMENT PARTS 149645 CITY OF CYPRESS $25.00 BUDGETCOPY 1495M STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION 5311.50 UNDERGROUND FUEIJOIL STORAGE TAX 149547 SWRCB/AFRS $400.00 WASTE DISCHARGE FEE 149548 DATA SYSTEMS SERVICE $278.58 SOFTWARE 149549 ALBERT W DAVIES INC $474.827.36 CONSTRUCTION 3-36R 149550 DEL MAR ANALYTICAL 52,208.00 LAB SUPPLIES 149551 THE DIAMOND GROUP 54,000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 149552 LABCLEAR $100.52 LAB SUPPLIES 149553 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $392.51 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 149554 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $942.52 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 149555 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $265.50 PAINT SUPPLIES 149556 EDWARDS DIV.OF GS BLDG SYS. $2,641.50 SERVICE AGREEMENT 149557 LINDA EISMAN $636.66 TRAINING SUPPLIES 149558 EMERGENCY MGMT NETWORK $1,380.00 CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING 149559 ENCHANTER,INC. $2.800.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5-24-95 149560 FLUID TECH.SALES $614.71 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 149561 FST SAND AND GRAVEL,INC. $1,282.26 ROAD BASE MATERIALS 149662 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $16,318.36 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-11-91 149563 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $138.50 AIR FREIGHT 149564 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $416.84 FILTERS 149665 FIRST CHOICE $1,164.32 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT 149566 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $429.60 LAB SUPPLIES 149567 FISONS INSTRUMENTS $2,161.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 149565 FLICKINGERCO $233.99 VALVE 149569 FLOSYSTEMS $10,575.06 PUMP PARTS 149570 FLUID METERING INC $2,051.17 LAB SUPPLIES 149571 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $895.80 PAINT SUPPLIES 149572 GMF SOUND INC $975.62 COMMUNICATIONS SUPPLIES 149573 DST,INC. $1,98TM OFFICE SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0122196 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0124196 POSTING DATE 0124M WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 149574 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $2.994,37 ELECTRIC PARTS 149575 GENERAL PETROLEUM $16,953.22 DIESEL/UNLEADED FUEL 149576 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $6.588.97 TELEPHONE SERVICES 14957 TOM GERUNGER $1,723.44 REIMS.TRAINING B TRAVEL 149578 GOVT CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENT $175.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 149579 GOVERNMENT INSTITUTES INC $1.655.00 PUBLICATIONS 149580 GRASSY S.T.I. $604.50 ENGINE PARTS 149581 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC WHOLESALE $402.43 FIBER OPTIC SUPPLIES 14082 DGA CONSULTANTS 56,933.93 SURVEYING SERVICES MO 8-23-958 MO 64-94 149583 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $958.49 TRUCK PARTS 14VA4 HARBOUR ENGINEERING $15,571.00 MECHANICAL PARTS 149585 HAUTAWAY CONTAINERS $730.00 CONTAINER RENTALS 149586 HAWKINS ASSOCIATES $450.00 LAB EQUIPMENT 149587 HOLMES S NARVER,INC. $9.125.30 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI44&P2-53 MO 3-&95 149588 HOME DEPOT 5132.26 SMALL HARDWARE 149689 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $988.89 PAINT SUPPLIES 149590 IAHS PRESS $65.00 PUBLICATION 149591 1 C M A DISTRIBUTION CTR $232.40 PUBLICATIONS 149592 IPCO SAFETY $3.097.46 SAFETY SUPPLIES 149593 ITT BARTON SALES $960.29 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 149594 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $426.31 BATTERIES 149595 CITY OF IRVINE $29,000.00 ADJUST B REHABILITATE 43 MANHOLES 149596 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $70.44 WATER USE 14097 J2 PRINTING SERVICES $525.62 PRINTING 149598 JAMISON ENGINEERING $25,098.32 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 149599 JAYS CATERING $4T60 DIRECTORS MEETING EXPENSE 149M JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO. $64.80 GAUGE 149601 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $1,166.08 ELECTRIC PARTS 149602 JONES CHEMICALS.INC. $13,916.72 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE MO 4-26-95 149603 JONES INDUSTRIAL HARDWARE CO. $1,091.87 TOOLS 149604 KAL ARCHITECTS $1,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE 149505 FRANCES L.KALUZNY $1,680.D0 HUMAN RESOURCES CONSULTANT 149606 KEYE PRODUCTIVITY CENTER $248.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 1496137 KING BEARING,INC. $1,045.96 MACHINE SUPPLIES 149608 KIPLINGER $132.00 PUBLICATION 149509 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $6,538.02 TOOLS 149610 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE OO. $330.79 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICE 149611 LAIDLAW ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES $32,220.24 WASTE DISPOSAL 149612 LAMSON CORPORATION $213.89 COMPUTER PARTS 149613 LAW/CRANDAL,INC. $1,778.76 SOIL TESTING 7-13.94 149614 LEAGUE OF CLAIF.CRIES $165.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 149615 LEE B RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC. $23,798.69 ENGINEERING SERVICES 149616 SOLD-LYNCH CORP. $493.93 JANITORIAL SERVICES 149517 MPS $59.34 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 149618 MACOMOO $464.10 SERVICE AGREEMENT 149619 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS,INC. S6,1S4.68 MECHANICAL SUPPUES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 01/22/96 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0124196 POSTING DATE 01/24/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 149620 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $612,150.00 CONSTRUCTION P1-3&2 149621 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $58,703.97 CONSTRUCTION P2.42-2 149622 MARTIN INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE $3,475.20 SECURITY CONSULTING 149623 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $438.88 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 149624 THE MCGRAW-HILL COMPANIES $134.47 PUBLICATION 149625 DONALD F. MCINTYRE $103.91 REIMBURSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE 149626 MEASUREMENT VARIABLES,INC. $1,236.98 FILTER SUPPLIES 149527 MIDWAY MFG.&MACHINING $9.298.68 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 14%28 MILLTRONICS $1,787.53 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 149629 MONITOR LABS $249.98 INSTRUMENT 149630 MUSTANG UNITS CO.,INC. $3,509.00 ENGINE 149631 NASCO $271.33 LAB SUPPLIES 149M NAT WEST MARKETS $1.000.00 COP INTEREST DRAW FEES 149633 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES $875.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 149634 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $2,215.02 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 149635 NEWARK ELECTRONICS $153.05 INSTRUMENT PARTS 149636 NICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY $20.901.82 LUBRICANTS/DIESEL FUEL 149637 OLSTEN STAFFING SERVICES $2.016.00 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 149638 THE ORANGE COUNTY FORUM $375.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING 149639 ORANGE VALVE B FITTING CO. $1,375.39 F MNGS 149640 OXYGEN SERVICE $1,628.01 SPECIALTY GASES 149641 COUNTY OF ORANGE $2,630.50 PERMITS 149542 PACIFIC PARTS $2,381.62 INSTRUMENT PARTS 149 13 PACIFIC BELL $1,702.86 TELEPHONE SERVICES 149644 PADGETT - THOMPSON $585.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 149645 PAGENET $1,015.90 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 149646 PALLETS B ACCESSORIES CO. $1,531.13 PALLETS 149647 PARKHOUSE TIRE,INC. $1,108.88 TIRES 149648 PARTS UNLIMITED $338.96 TRUCK PARTS 149649 PEGASUS MAIL-C/O DAVID HARRIS $350.00 SOFTWARE 149660 PENN STATE UNIVERSITY $4,790.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 149651 MIKE PETERSON $105.49 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 149652 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $4,551.57 REIMS.PETTY CASH,TRAINING&TRAVEL 149653 POLYMETRICS,INC. $1.262.75 LAB SUPPLIES 149664 POLYPURE,INC. $23,199.40 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-92 149655 POSTAGE BY PHONE $5,000.00 POSTAGE 149656 PUMPING SOLUTIONS INC $813.66 PUMP PARTS 149657 PUT2MEISTER,INC. $92.52 PUMP PARTS 149558 DIMS INC $183.23 REPAIR 149659 QUICKSTART TECHNOLOGIES $3.760.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 149660 R&R INSTRUMENTS $561.59 ELECTRIC PARTS 149661 RAININ INSTRUMENT GO. $902.88 LAB SUPPLIES 149582 THE REGISTER $1,168.80 NOTICES&ADS 149663 REMEDYTEMP $3,190.71 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 149664 RENOLD INC. $85.10 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 149M DON RICHARDSON WATER TRUCK $8,249.50 WATERTANK FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 01/22/96 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 01/24M POSTING DATE 01/24/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 1496M RM MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL $2,378.95 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 149667 RODNEY-HUNT CO $245.40 HEADWORKS REPAIR 149M SKC WEST $1,284.94 SAFETY SUPPLIES 149669 SANTA FE BAG CO. $218.94 FREIGHT 149670 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $78.12 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 149671 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTL $0,715.64 OCEAN MONITORING MO 6-2SAS 149672 R.CRAIG SCOTT&ASSOC. $2,756.87 LEGAL SERVICES-PERSONNEL ISSUES 149673 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $1,482.16 SPECIALTY GASES 149674 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $2,033.60 TOOLS 149675 SHURELUCK SALES $4,215.09 TOOLS/NARDWARE 149676 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $1,588.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 149677 SMITH-EMERY CO. $516.OD SOIL TESTING M.0.7-13-99 149678 SMITH PIPE&SUPPLY $343.37 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 149679 ROYA SOHAWIKI $754.62 DAMAGE CLAIM SETTLEMENT 149680 SO COASTAIR QUALITY $1,642.48 PERMIT FEES 149681 SOUTHERN CALIF ASSOC OF $75.00 PUBLICATION 149662 SO CALIF EDISON 00 $1.284.86 POWER 149583 SO CALIF EDISON CO $25,896.30 POWER 149664 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $27,157.73 NATURAL GAS 149685 SO.CALIF.WATER CO. $69.03 WATER USE 149686 SPEX CHEMICAL&SAMPLE PREP $314.98 LAB SUPPLIES 149687 SUMMIT STEEL $2,538.17 METAL 149US SUPELCO,INC. $1,320.63 LAB SUPPLIES 149669 SUPER CHEM CORP. $608.86 CHEMICALS 149690 SURVEYORS SERVICE CO $134.79 TOOLS 149691 SYNECTIC MEDICAL,INC. $1,561.00 LAB SUPPLIES 149692 T&C INDUSTRIAL CONTROLS $1,613.00 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 149693 TEKTRONIX,INC. $385.96 INSTRUMENT PARTS 149694 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $369.21 MECHANICAL PARTS 149695 THORPE INSULATION $47.63 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 149595 TONYS LOCK&SAFE SERVICE $80.81 LOCKS&KEYS 149897 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $202.05 TRUCK PARTS 149598 TRUESDAIL LABS $3.540.00 LAB SERVICES 149699 JG TUCKER&SON,INC. $15.111.20 INSTRUMENT PARTS 149700 VWR SCIENTIFIC $3.281.08 LAB SUPPLIES 149701 VALIN CORPORATION $498.46 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 149702 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $1,392,410 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 149703 VERTEX TECHNOLOGIES,INC. $5.192.66 FIBEROPTICS 149704 WARREN GORHAM&LAMONT INC $349.21 PUBLICATION&SUBSCRIPTION 149705 WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION $1A55.96 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT COURSES 149706 WAXIE $1.955.02 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 149707 WAYNE ELECTRIC $283.83 TRUCK PARTS 149708 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $23,679.12 CAUSTIC SODA MO 8-23-95 149709 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $367.28 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 149710 ROURKE,WOODRUFF&SPRADLIN $78.983.59 LEGAL SERVICES MO 7-2"5 149711 XEROX CORP. $16,404.62 COPIER LEASES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 0122M PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0124/96 POSTING DATE 0124/98 WARRANTNO. VENDOR 149712 JOHNSON YOKOGAWA CORP. $714.63 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 12/27/95 $2,387.767.17 SUMMARY AMOUNT #1 CONSTR FUND $92.60 02 OPER FUND $14.36 02 CAP FAC FUND $1,028.74 #2 CONSTR FUND $262.51 #3 OPER FUND $25,344.19 #3 CAP FAC FUND $474,827.36 #3 CONSTR FUND $283.71 #5 OPER FUND $392.27 #5 CONSTR FUND $84.80 #6 CONSTR FUND $89.20 #7 OPER FUND 575.42 #7 CAP FAC FUND 312,016.06 #7 CONSTR FUND 98.11 011 OPER FUND 8,740.18 011 CAP FAC FUND 1,637.14 #11 CONSTR FUND 85.71 #13 CONSTR FUND $3.40 014 OPER FUND $30.85 914 CAP FAC FUND $714.00 914 CONSTR FUND $19.96 #3&11 OPER FUND $875.00 #5&S OPER FUND $34.04 #58S CAP FAC FUND $644.00 46&7 OPER FUND $213.30 #7&14 OPER FUND $15.98 JT OPER FUND $330,891.89 CORF $716,314.33 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $3,511.49 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $506,946.67 $2.387,767.17 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 01/30/96 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 01/30/96 POSTING DATE O1I30/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 149714 ACWA $300.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING 149715 CALIF.DEBT ADVISORY $100.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING 149716 JAYS CATERING $1,684A9 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE 149717 R.CRAIG SCOTT B ASSOC. $8.682.81 LEGAL SERVICES-PERSONNEL ISSUES $10,667.50 SUMMARY AMOUNT JT OPER FUND $1,984.69 CORF $100.00 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $8,582.81 $10,667.50 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE OVD6195 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 02107M POSTING DATE 02107M WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 149731 AT&T- UNIPLANSERVICE $2,494.65 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 149732 AT&T-MEGACOM SERVICE $1,40C38 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 149733 AT&T $56.53 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 149734 AT&T-CELLULAR CR&R $8.65 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 149735 A-Z LOGIC SYSTEMS $192.62 LABSUPPLIES 149736 RP ADAMS COMPANY $1,750.43 MECHANICAL PARTS 149737 AIR LIQUIDE AMERICA CORP. $1,947.32 SPECIALTY GASSES 14973E AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $18,565.43 O&M AGREEMENT OKY GEN.SYST.M.O.B.9.89 149739 AIRBORNE EXPRESS $347.57 AIR FREIGHT 149740 AMERIDATA $1,128.61 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 149741 AMERICAN AIRLINES $824.35 TRAVEL SERVICES 149742 AMOCO ENERGY TRADING $61,394.58 NATURAL GAS MO 6.28-95 149743 ANIXTER-DISTRIBUTION $3.670.09 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 149744 APLUS SYSTEMS $2,332.22 NOTICES&ADS 149746 APPLE ONE $2,208.80 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 149746 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $124.63 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 149747 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT $1,346.82 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 149748 ATKINIJONES COMPUTER SERVICE $642.60 SERVICE AGREEMENT 149749 AUTODESKINC. $5,096.52 SOFTWARE 149750 B.M.I. $325.00 ELECTRIC PARTS 149751 E S BABCOCK&SONS INC $898.50 LAB ANALYSIS 149752 BANANA BLUEPRINT $22,449.24 PRINTING M.O.11-07-94 149753 BANK OF AMERICA $220.64 BANKING CHARGES 149754 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $984.95 BATTERIES 149755 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $1,204.72 LAB SUPPLIES 149756 BERENDSEN FLUID POWER $112.27 VALVE 149757 BLANCHARD TRAINING&DEV $1,083.30 TRAINING PUBLICATIONS 149758 TOM BLANDA $136.79 TRAINING EXPENSE REIMS . 149759 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $2.842.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-18 149760 BRENNER-FIEDLER&ASSOC.,INC. $5,597.67 GENERATORS 149761 BROOKS INSTRUMENT DIV. $341.25 INSTRUMENT 149762 BUDGET JANITORIAL $3,330.00 JANITORIAL SERVICES MO 1-12-94 149763 BNI BOOKS $89.92 BOOKS 149764 CCI TECHNOLOGIES $420.00 SPLICE CABLES 149765 CEPA $899.50 LAB ANALYIS 149766 CH2M HILL $164,542.45 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-31 149767 CS COMPANY $5,762.96 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 149768 CALFON CONSTRUCTION $97,833.03 CONSTRUCTION 7-22&7-24 149769 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH INC. $969.75 LAB SUPPLIES 149770 CALTROL,INC. $6,303.69 HARDWARE 149T71 CAMAU CORP. $1,124.88 SERVICE AGREEMENT 149772 CANUS CORPORATION $8,286.52 FIBER OPTIC CABLE 149773 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $32,317.74 ENGINEERING SERVICES MO 5-24-95 149774 RICHARD CASTILLON $135.96 TRAINING EXPENSE REIMB 149775 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $1,758.15 OFFICE FURNITURE 149776 CHEMWEST INC $1,335.02 PUMP PARTS FUND NO 9199 - R DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0V06IN PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 02/07/96 POSTING DATE 02107M WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 149777 CHROME CRANKSHAFT,INC. S2AOA0 PUMP PARTS 140778 CLEMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL $20,086.10 CONSULTANT-LANDFILL PROJECT MO 7-31.95 149779 COASTAL VIDEO COMMUNICATION $13,501.43 TRAINING VIDEOS 149780 COUCH&SONS $30,643.20 CONSTRUCTION M-044 149781 COUCH 8 SONS $190,334.00 CONSTRUCTION 11-17.1 W82 COMMUNICATIONS PERFORMANCE GROUP $17,850.0D PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 149783 COMPUSA,INC. $64.97 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 149784 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $7.659.20 ELECTRIC PARTS 149785 CONSUMER PIPE $2,071.20 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 149786 CONTINENTAL EQUIPMENT 8 SUPPLY $2,213.04 TOOLS 149787 CONTINENTAL LAB PRODUCTS,INC. $60.54 LAB SUPPLIES 149788 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $17,897.03 ENGINE PARTS 149789 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $2,464.74 ELECTRIC PARTS 149790 CHARLES P.CROV A",CO. $648.26 INSTRUMENT PARTS 149791 ALBERT W.DAVIES,INC. $320,454.55 CONSTRUCTION 3-36R 149792 DOUGLAS J DAVIS&ASSOC.,INC. $3.949.90 INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE SERVICES 149793 DELL COMPUTER CORP. $752.10 COMPUTER PARTS 149794 DELMAR ANALYTICAL $190.00 BIOSOUDS ANALYSIS 149795 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIF. $60,889.11 DENTAL INSURANCE PLAN M.O.1.12.94 149796 DELTA FOAM PRODUCTS $145.00 LAB SUPPLIES 149797 THE DIAMOND GROUP $4.000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 149798 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $31,912.81 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 149799 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $90.51 PAINT SUPPLIES 149M OVALS SALES $576.19 FRTINGS 149801 DYCORP $241.79 TRUCK PARTS 149502 ESP NORTH $685.46 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 149803 EDWARDS HIGH VACUUM INTER. $290.57 LAB SUPPLIES 149504 FMC CORPORATION $75,299.11 HYDROGEN PEROXIDE MO 9.14-94 149B05 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $111.65 AIR FREIGHT 149M FILTERLINE CORP. $37.00 FILTERS 149807 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $4.839.53 FILTERS 149M FIRST CHOICE $391.64 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT 149809 FISCHER B PORTER CO. $2,774.75 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 149810 FISHER ROSEMOUNT $1,736.98 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 149811 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $13,591.44 WATER USE 149812 FRY'S ELECTRONICS $723.39 ELECTRONIC&COMPUTER SUPPLIES 149813 EST,INC. $11,443.85 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 149814 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $2,643.98 CHEMICALS 149815 GATES FIBERGLASS INSTALLERS $3,204.62 FIBERGLASS WHEEL 149816 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. 54,056.49 ELECTRIC PARTS 149817 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1,078.10 TELEPHONE SERVICES 149818 GERHARDTS,INC. $4,200.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 149819 GIERUCH-MITCHELL,INC. $25,486.56 PUMP PARTS 149820 4WV GRAINGER.INC. $122.64 COMPRESSOR PARTS 149521 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $2,095.90 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 14982.2 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC WHOLESALE $3,238.29 FIBER OPTIC SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGOATE 02106W PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 02/07/96 POSTING DATE 02/07/9B WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 149823 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $600.52 PRINTING 149824 DGA CONSULTANTS $3,020.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.641-94 149825 HR DIRECT $13.99 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1498M HB TYPE&GRAPHICS $346.96 PRINTING 149827 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $3.199.88 TRUCK PARTS 149828 HACH COMPANY $3,810.36 LAB SUPPLIES 149829 GEORGE T.HALL CO. $456.18 ELECTRIC PARTS 149830 HATCH&KIRK,INC. $3,024.91 TRUCK PARTS 149831 PL HAWN CO,INC. $321.23 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 149832 HELLO DIRECT $198.76 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 149833 HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT $2,083.33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN. 149834 HERTZ EQUIPMENT RENTAL $602.95 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 149835 HOERBIGER CVS CALIF.,INC. $2,972.57 COMPRESSOR PARTS 14%36 HOME DEPOT $756.92 SMALL HARDWARE 149837 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $653.38 PAINT SUPPLIES 149838 I CM A DISTRIBUTION CENTER $141.85 PUBLICATION 149839 IPCO SAFETY $4,121.94 SAFETY SUPPLIES 149840 ISI INFORTEXT $3.692.75 SOFTWARE 149841 ITT BARTON SALES $192.12 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 149842 IMAGING PLUS $523,81 OFFICE SUPPLIES 149843 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS- $35.56 CONNECTORS 149W INORGANIC VENTURES $22Z72 LAB SUPPLIES 149US INSIDE EPA $1,335.00 SUBSCRIPTIONS 14SUS INSTRUMENT LABORATORY $373.59 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 149547 IRVINE PHOTO GRAPHICS $21.29 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 149848 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $5.54 WATER USE 149849 IRVINE SCI-TECH BOOKS $43000 PUBLICATIONS 149850 J2 PRINTING SERVICES $2,533.79 PRINTING 14%51 JAMISON ENGINEERING $12,010.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 149852 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $1.711.37 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 149853 DEE JASPAR 8 ASSOC. $5.086.32 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 149854 JAYS CATERING $1,418.39 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE 149855 JOHNSON CONTROLS,INC. $203.60 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 149856 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $149.20 ELECTRIC PARTS 149857 JOHNSTON PUMP CO $2.183.02 ELECTRIC PARTS 149858 JONES CHEMICALS, INC. $7,457.31 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE MO 420.95 149859 FRANCES L KALUZNY $1.280.00 HUMAN RESOURCES CONSULTANT 149860 KELLY PAPER $937.40 PRINTING 149861 KEMIRON PACIFIC,INC. $149.592.10 FERRIC CHLORIDE MO9-27-95 149862 KERRY CONSULTING GROUP $3,906.18 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MO I1-15-95 149863 KEYE PRODUCTIVITY CENTER $139.00 REGISTRATION 149864 KING BEARING,INC. $1,408.90 MACHINE SUPPLIES 149W5 KLEINFELDER $432.00 GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTING SERVICES 149M KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $5,59B.92 TOOLS 149867 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $613.57 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICE 145869 LAIDLAW ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES $5.444.04 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DISPOSAL FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 02/06/96 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 02/07/96 POSTING DATE 02M7/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 149869 LAN-AIR SUPPLY CO.,INC. $114.53 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 149870 LASERALL CORP. $582.00 PRINTER REPAIR 149871 LAW/CRANDAL,INC. $660.00 SOIL TESTING 7.13-94 149872 LEE B RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC. $9,9D6.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES 149873 LIEBERT CORPORATION $2,291.38 ELECTRIC PARTS 149874 KP.LINDSTROM,INC. $3,481.14 ENVIR.CONSULTING SERVICES MO 12-9-90 149875 LUSTRE-CAL $545.96 SAFETY 149876 MDT BIOLOGIC COMPANY $936.00 LAB SUPPLIES 149877 MPS $414.84 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 149878 MACOMOO $696.75 SERVICE AGREEMENT 149879 MAGNETEK $38.213.59 GENERATOR MAINTENANCE 149880 MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY CORP. $1,652.48 TOOLS 149881 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $22.20 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 149082 MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. $551.63 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 149883 MIDWAY MFG.B MACHINING $3,029.56 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 149884 MISSION INDUSTRIES $6,704.89 UNIFORM RENTALS 149885 MONITOR LABS $874.44 INSTRUMENT 149886 MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE $5,D00.00 RATING SERVICE MAINTENANCE FEES 149887 MOORE PRODUCTS DO $179.39 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 149888 MORTON SALT $673.70 SALT 149889 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES $5,387.50 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 149890 G ROBERT NEASE PHOTOGRAPHY $1,677.67 PROFESSIONAL PHOTOGRAPHER 149691 NEW HORIZONS COMPUTER CENTERS,INC. $780.00 SOFTWARE TRAINING CLASSES 149892 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $6.00 WATER USE 149893 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $6,929.94 OFFICE SUPPLIES 149894 OLSTEN STAFFING SERVICES $1,708.00 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 149895 ORANGE COURIER $138.65 COURIER SERVICES 149696 ORANGE VALVE 8 FITTING CO. $107.91 FITTINGS 149897 OXYGEN SERVICE $3.488.73 SPECIALTY GASES 149898 ORANGE CO EMPLOYEES $4.799.25 EARLY RETIREMENT PROGRAM REIMB 149899 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT $27,750.20 GAP WATER USE M.0.6-9-93 149900 PACIFIC CLIPPIINGS $188.80 CONTRACT SERVICE 149901 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $1,116.06 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 149902 PACIFIC PARTS $9.238.84 INSTRUMENT PARTS 149903 PACIFIC BELL $16.90 TELEPHONE SERVICES 149904 PARAGON CABLE $41.28 CABLE SERVICES 149905 PARKHOUSE TIRE,INC. $555.99 TIRES 149906 PEDERSEN COMMUNICATIONS $4.348.00 INSTALLATION OF CABLES 149907 PERSONAL STRENGHTS PUBLICATION $394.01 PUBLICATION 149908 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $620.07 REIMB.PETTY CASH,TRAINING 8 TRAVEL 149909 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $193,093.20 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3.2M!i 149910 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS $5.914.44 CONSULTING SERVICE 149911 POLYPURE,INC. $24,135.22 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92 149912 POWER PROTECTION $432.48 MISC.HARDWARE 149913 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $112.00 ICE FOR SAMPLES 149914 PROMINENT FLUID CONTROL,INC. $799.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE O2/05196 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 02/07/96 POSTING DATE 02/07/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 149915 PRYOR REPORT $532.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 149916 PUBLIC SECTOR EXCELLENCE $7,200.00 TRAINING CONSULTANT-RISK MGMT 149917 PUMPING SOLUTIONS,INC. $298.33 PUMP PARTS 149918 PYRAMID FENCE COMPANY $2.275.00 FENCING INSTALLATION 149919 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $690.59 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS 149920 R&RINSTRUMENTS $1,537.7D ELECTRIC PARTS 149921 REMEDYTEMP $2.245.53 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 149922 DON RICHARDSON WATER TRUCK $8,218.50 WATERTANK 149923 RM MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL AND/OR RITTAL $2,126.67 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 149924 LAWRENCE ROOD $186.85 EXPENSE REPORT 149925 BANDON ENGINEERING,INC. $750.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 149926 SANTA FIE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $154.83 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 149927 BASCO ELECTRIC $2.220.00 CONTRACT SERVICES 149928 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTL $38.887.70 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.63-94 149929 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $3.678.03 SPECIALTY GASES 149930 SENTIENT SYSTEMS,INC. $19,619.87 FACILITATOR SERVICES 14MI SHURELUCK SALES $3,810.75 TOOLS/HARDWARE 149932 THE SMITH GROUP $3.487.10 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 149933 SOLAR TURBINES INCORPORATED $304.98 MECHANICAL PARTS 149934 SO COAST AIR QUALITY $2,59,119 PERMIT FEES 149935 SO CALIF EDISON CO $59,477.32 POWER 149935 $0 CALIF EDISON CO $16,241.93 POWER 149937 SO.CALIFORNIA MARINE INST. $800.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 149938 STAMEN Z.SPASSOFF P.E. $4,000.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19-2 149939 SUMMIT STEEL $602.02 METAL 149940 SUPERB ONE-HOUR PHOTO $36.26 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 149941 SYMCAS $5.657.92 SOFTWARE LICENSE 149042 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $2,728.03 MECHANICAL PARTS 149943 TIRE WAREHOUSE $1.113.62 TIRES 149944 TONER SYSTEM INTERNATIONAL $1,412.18 PRINTER SUPPLIES 149945 TRANE $352.41 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 149946 TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY,INC. $17,503.84 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.O.5-11-94 149947 TRUCK B AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $535.71 TRUCK PARTS 149948 TRUESDAIL LABS $1,128.10 LAB SERVICES 149949 JG TUCKER&SON,INC. $2,326.54 INSTRUMENT PARTS 149950 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $403.00 LAB SUPPLIES 149951 UNISOURCEWOR BUTLER PAPER $837.49 OFFICE SUPPLIES 149952 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $606.70 PARCEL SERVICES 149953 VWR SCIENTIFIC $145.42 LAB SUPPLIES 149954 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $2,089.95 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 149955 VANIER BUSINESS FORMS $975.95 OFFICE SUPPLIES 149956 VARIAN ASSOCIATES,INC. $1,298.61 LAB SUPPLIES 149957 VERTEX SYSTEMS $3,570.26 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT 149958 VILLAGE NURSERIES $326.26 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 149959 WACKENHUT CORP. $27,296.79 CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS 149M WALCON CONSTRUCTION CO. $170,041.19 CONSTRUCTION 537-3 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 02MISM PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 02007/96 POSTING DATE 02007/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR 149961 WALGON CONSTRUCTION CO. $8,400.89 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 149962 CARL WARREN B CO. $300.00 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR 149963 WAXIE 54,792.61 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 149964 WESTERN CITY MAGAZINE $63.00 SUBSCRIPTION 149965 WESTERN COMPONENT SALES NORTH $417.32 LAB SUPPLIES 149966 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $35,993.49 CAUSTIC SODA MO 8-23-95 149967 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $1,015.13 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 149968 WESCO $290.89 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 149969 WOLFE AND ASSOCIATESJNC. $1,688.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 149970 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. 1291.57 LAB SUPPLIES 149971 YELLOW SPRINGS INSTRUMENT CO. $37.14 LAB SUPPLIES 149972 AG TECH COMPANY $58,580.03 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O./0-9-91 149973 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. $60.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL 140974 AWARDS B TROPHIES $147.58 PLAQUES 149975 BANANA BLUEPRINT $227.10 PRINTING M.O.11-07-94 149976 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $4,340.62 LAB SUPPLIES 149977 BIOGRO DIVISION $54,345.91 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 4-26-95 149978 COMPUSERVE $126.02 COMPUTER SERVICES 149979 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $1,463.86 ELECTRIC PARTS 149980 ENCHANTER,INC. $3,500.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5-24-95 149981 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $867.70 LAB SERVICES 149982 FST SAND AND GRAVEL,INC. $769.35 ROAD BASE MATERIALS 149963 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $7.568.75 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 140M FILTER SUPPLY CO. $33.97 FILTERS 149985 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $889.16 LAB SUPPLIES 149986 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $360.68 PHOTO SUPPLIES 149987 NEW HORIZONS COMPUTER CENTERS,INC. $5,340.00 SOFTWARE TRAINING CLASSES 149988 BOLT DELIVERY $99.30 FREIGHT $2.602,740.34 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE OV06196 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 02/07186 POSTING DATE 02I07196 SUMMARY AMOUNT #1 CONSTR FUND $443.50 02 OPER FUND $3,135.08 02 CAP FAC FUND $11.91 #2 CONSTR FUND $106.50 #3 OPER FUND $42.711.83 #3 CAP FAC FUND $380,028.95 #3 CONSTR FUND $1,074.50 #5 OPER FUND $12,132.11 #5 CONSTR FUND $570.50 #6 CAP FAC FUND W9.84 #6 CONSTR FUND $183.00 #7 OPER FUND $15,594.71 #7 CAP FAC FUND $46.079.18 #7 CONSTR FUND $515.00 #11 OPER FUND $4.148.29 #11 CAP FAC FUND $190,778.76 #11 CONSTR FUND $227.00 #14 CAP FAG FUND $17.05 #5&6 OPER FUND $2,454.64 #566 CAP FAC FUND 170,082.66 #687 OPER FUND 2.258.68 #7814 OPER FUND 6,341.96 JT OPER FUND $1,097,537.60 CORP $377.866.63 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $63,272.44 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $183.218.02 $2.602,740.34 JOINT CHAIRMAN'S REPORT JOINT BOARD MEETING OF FEBRUARY 28, 1996 1 . I'M SURE YOU HAVE READ THE ARTICLES IN THE NEWSPAPER ON THE SPILL IN NEWPORT BEACH. DON MC INTYRE WILL BE DISCUSSING IT IN MORE DETAIL DURING HIS REPORT. 2. THE NEXT DIRECTORS' WORKSHOP ON STRATEGIC PLANNING HAS BEEN SCHEDULED FOR SATURDAY, MAY 4, 1996 BETWEEN 9 AND NOON HERE IN THE BOARD ROOM. THE ELEMENTS THAT WILL BE ADDRESSED ARE WATER CONSERVATION AND RECLAMATION, THE STAFF WANTS TO MAKE THIS SESSION MORE "GIVE-AND-TAKE" AND LESS OF A LECTURE, AND TO THAT END IS CONSIDERING HIRING A FACILITATOR TO HELP GENERATE MORE AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION. i 3. UPCOMING MEETINGS: A. THE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE WILL MEET ON WEDNESDAY, MARCH 6TH AT 5:30 P.M. B. THE PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE WILL MEET ON THURSDAY, MARCH 7TH AT 5:30 P.M. C. THE FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE WILL MEET ON WEDNESDAY, MARCH 13TH AT 5:30 P.M. D. THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE WILL MEET ON WEDNESDAY, MARCH 2OTH AT 5:30 P.M. TO CONSIDER THE PORTER PLATING APPEAL. E. THE NEXT BOARD MEETING IS SCHEDULED FOR MARCH 27TH. 2 • MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 28. 1996 TIME:7.30 P.M. DISTRICTS: 1.2.3.5.6.7,11.13 AND 14 DISTRICT 1 JOINT BOARDS IMORENOI .... ... . . . . MC GUIGAN . . .. .. . . ✓ IKERRYI ............. BOWMAN ......... ✓ IPERRYISCHAFERN .. . . . FERRYMAN . .... . .. IHASTMGSI........... BROWN ........... �/ ICOONTZI . .. . . . .. . . . MURMY .. . . ..... . T ISCOTR . ............ COLLINS .......... _le (POTTSI ........ . . . . SALTARELLI . . .... .. . (DEBAYN .. ........... ............ — (STEINER) ........ . . . STANTON . . ....... W ICO%1 ... . ........... DEBAY ........... / — (ULU ....... ........ DENES ........... f — IBAUEA) .. . . .. ....... DUNLAP F .......::DISTRI — (SCOTTCT 2 (PARKER( . . ... ....... ECKMR G ..... (SCOTR ............ COLLINS .......... IDOWNEYI RRY/SC. .. ... . ..... ECKENPODE ....(GUILLDU . _ JULU .SONS........... WELCH (ANDERSOM ... ...... FLORA .. ...... IPARK .............. DENES ............ (MARS ALL) ....... ... FLORA ........... ✓ (DOWNS ......... DUNIAP........... (WELCH) .. .......... GRINTIQULUN .......... _ (ANDERO .......... ECKENPOOE ........ (WELCH) ........... .. HAMM SON ........ (MOUN ) . ......... FLOM ............ Imu ............. HAMMONO ........ y (MORENOI ........... MCOUIOAN ........ IBAUEN ............. LEIPZIO ........... (COONTZI ........... MUPPHV .......... OWNER) ............. UNN .... ......... — IBANKHEADI ......... NOflBY............ IMORENOI ........... . MC OUIOAN........ — R KETI............ SINGER ......... (COONTZI ........... . MURFHY . . ........ ISTEINEN ........... STANTON ......... IBANKNEADI ........ .. NORBY ........... — IDALYI ............. ZEMEL ............ (EVANSI ........... RICE .... ......... (POTTS) . ........... . SALTARELLI........ DISTRICTS IDOTSON) ............ SAM .. ......... _ IDOTSONI ........... SAPIEN .. a RLAKER............. SINGER .. ......... IPARKERI ........... DUNLAP........... STEMERI........... .. STANTON . ........ IKERFM ........... . BOWMAN ........ ISTANTONI ........... STEINEA .. ........ (HASTMGS)......... . BROWN . (MILLER) .. SWAN.. . ......... (SCOTT) ............ COLLMS ........: IWAHLSTROM ........ SYLVIA IANDERSON] ....... .. FRORM (GUL ONI .......... WELCN . . ....... ( ......... GROVIN .... IDALYI . ............. . = ZEMEL .......... _ (MUM ............ IEIFZPS ......... (MINER) ............ LMN ........... IMORENOI ........... MCOUIOAN ........ STAFF OTHERS (BANKHEAD) ......... NOR BY.... ........ ANDERSON . Jt� WOODRUFF .. � (EVANS I............ RILE ........... GRAY ..... JL ANDRUS ....� RLAKER............ SINGER ....... HASENSTAB WO DEMIR ..... ISTEINENI STANTON ......... HODGES ... JL NEE .. .. .... (WAHLSTROM) ...... BYLVM .........:. HOVEY .... JL LMDSTROM (DALY) ............. gMIL .......... JONK .... NIXON. ..... KYLE ..... SHAW . . . ... � DISTRICTS LINDEN .... (LOAN .............. CFBAY............ LUDWINMCWTY ... . ISTANFO. .......... 111 IN ............ MMEMY .. ........ IDEBAYI ............FBBN�............. ► MdELLY .. .......... OOTEN .... ..........� DISTRICTS STPEED ... .......... (PERRY/SCHAFFN ..... 16WVMAN......... TUCKMAIN . . .. .... _ NCO%I . ............. DRAY........... WHEATLEY . . . .. ISTANTONI .......... BIEY61........... WILSON .. . . . . . . .... WINSOR . . . .. . . .. .. DISTRICT 7 /•/ /'Y/'P`�-V�'� � , MARDI . ... ... .... . HAMMOND......... � 'a IPOTTSI . .. . ... ..... SALTARELLI ........ .............. : ao f�CO%1 . . . .......... DE ....NR FERN . .... FERRYMAN.... . 4-� � , IMORENOP ........... MMRIIAN MURICOONTZN ........... RHV ISTANTONI .......... STERNER.........: "'t" ^ ' DISTRICT.. IE IBAUERI .... ........ FZIQ ✓ — �.,/�L� /^'i"'v -� (MUM) . ......... ....... TTT (.w•^' ISTEM "ANION IAI ........... BTANTON ......... DISTRICT 13 (WELCH( ............ GULLMSDN ...... IDALYN .. .......... ZEMEI .... ........ MARKER) ........... OUNLAP.... ....... (COONTZI ........... MURPHY .. ........ ISTANTONI STEINER..... ...... — DISTRICT 14 IPOTTSI .......... SALTAREI ........ .V _ ICCONTZI ............ MURPRY . ....... (WARD) ......... HAMMOND......... _ (STANTON) .......... STEINER.. ......... _ J:IWPOOMBSIDIHECTOFID1.IO2. (MILLER) ............ SWAN ... ..... .... J;op� 02128/96 PUBLIC SIGN-IN SHEET oo COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY February 28, 1996 BOARD MEETING NAME R ANIZATI N FIRM Please Print Please Print a v4p,gv bizwSSL SV0 2D P /LA / vN TQT6 Sk7n [ tiA/[6RCL27 P/C iNaL�r REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION AND REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES. DATE: a - a8 -y' �, AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (PLEASE PRINT) Mar-L Aslu �a5 ff HOME ADDRESS: 3 c9a Z AfA e i Q ST, NUMBER STREET � c-�/ iAe CA- '? a7i -( i ITY ZIP CODE TELEPHONE: 77/ ( -S(d1I3 REPRESENTING: C, h SELF UR NAME OF R ANIZATIO F28A REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BB ARD�r- DETERMINED BY THE HAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION AND REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES. I1 DATE: �2 4f � AGENDA ITEM NO. -�4 kL / NAME: (PLEASE PRINT) p'lQ4 I'IcQT��- HOME ADDRESS: U 14 NUMBT ( + t5'7ebA- 4 0 OD-6V LrFL;UU TELEPHONE: REPRESENTING: (SELF OR MARE F ORGANIZATION F28A 02/28/96 -JOINT BOARD MINUTES #4 - Receive and File Minute Excerpts VJC: Moving on to item#4 the Supplemental Agenda Item. We have a number of items on there. VJC: Appointment of the Supervisors to the various Districts and we have a District No. 2 appointment from Villa Park and receipt of the excerpts. Any opposition? They're approved. #5 - Public Comments VJC: We have two items tonight for public comment DFM: It might be more appropriate if those came up at the time we talk about the excess capacity charge. VJC: Any objection from the public? Any other public comment at this time? Okay, we'll move into the comments from the Chairman. #Ja) - Report of Acting Joint Chair/Vice Joint Chair(Joint Chair Cox absent) VJC: I have a number of items here tonight. The first item I want to talk about is I think you've all seen in the newspaper reports about an unfortunate spill into Newport Beach. Don McIntyre will discuss this in more detail during his report. This is not from IRWD by the way. The second thing on a more serious note, the next Strategic Planning Meeting is scheduled for Saturday, May 4 between 9:00 am and noon. The first meeting was very successful. We have a very good turnout in the members of the Board and the public. In this upcoming meeting the staff is going to be talking about water conservation and reclamation. It is set up to be more of a give and take organization and this consideration of hiring a facilitator to help the meeting. Reclamation is a very large budget item and activity that this District has in cooperation with the Orange County Water District. The third item that I have here today deals with the Orange County Engineering Society Council, which is a non-profit organization of professional engineering society chapters. The purpose of the council is to recognize accomplishments of individuals, projects and companies and to enhance the image of engineering and the engineering profession. It encourages the participation in public affairs and it is set up to encourage young people to enter the profession. Each year the council holds an awards banquet in conjunction with the engineering week to recognize engineering achievements both by individuals and organizations and for projects. This past Saturday, our Director of Engineering, David Ludwin, attended the awards banquet to accept an engineering project achievement award for the secondary treatment expansion at Plant No. 2. The project was in recognition of the innovative engineering approach that provided a cost effective design requiring close coordination with Operations because we were continuing to operate the plant and it was designed and constructed to be environmental sensitive to the adjacent wetlands. Award presentation by VJC and comments by David Ludwin could not be heard. JAWPDOMEISWIN96WOTES.02 Page 1 #6 (a) - Report of Actina Joint ChairNice Joint Chair(continued) VJC: Upcoming meetings -the OMITS Committee will meet on Wednesday, March 6 at 5:30 pm; the PDC Committee will meet on Thursday, March 7 at 5:30 pm; the FAHR will meet on Wednesday, March 13 at 5:30 pm; the Executive Committee will meet on Wednesday, March 20 at 5:30 pm and that will be for consideration of an appeal; and the next Board Meeting is scheduled for March 27th. That concludes the report by Acting Joint Chair. #6(b) - Report of General Manager DFM: Mr. Chairman, just 3 quick items. First of all, we want to pull Item No. 9a from the Agenda. Secondly, now is the time that I'd like, with your permission Mr. Chairman, to have a discussion of the Bay Bridge Spill Report. In the form of an update, I'm going to call on Nancy Wheatley to lead that off. It's obviously, bad news, but we want you tD fully understand what happened and why it happened and what we're going to be doing about it. Finally, as John Cox told you last month, Mahin Talebi gave a presentation at CASA on how to be business friendly and we thought it would be of interest to all of you to have her make that presentation. So if time doesn't run too late with the discussion of the spill, we'll ask her to do that. Nancy Wheatley: Thank you. I'm going to MC the presentation. Bob Dolan, Director of Operations and Ed Hodges, Director of Maintenance and myself, Director of Technical Services are on this side of the room, I think our colleagues wanted us over here so that they would be protected from anything that might happen. Our departments had principle responsibilities for managing the events that occurred. The spill did begin at about 10:00 pm on Wednesday, February 21 st. Ed is going to discuss the chronology of the event as they unfolded overnight. I am going to discuss the response during the morning on the site which I was responsible for, Bob is going to review the operations issues raised by the events. Ed is then going to get up and comment further on some collection systems issues and I will finish with a discussion of the regulatory requirements which are reasonably serious and we'll talk more about that. For your information, in your folders this evening, there was a copy of the letter which we sent to the Regional Water Quality Control Board on Monday as a 5-day follow-up to the events and I'll be talking more about the regulatory requirements later on. With that, I'm going to turn it over to Ed. TLW: To the members of the Board, we are going to receive this presentation from the staff on all the facts because the staff wants to make it as public put forth as possible. We are also going to ask you to review a few portions of this issue in Closed Session on the basis of potential claims. I just want to be able to take you through it starting from the premise that just because there's a spill, doesn't automatically mean we are at fault and that we are liable and there are several issues that have been uncovered in the last couple of days. I do want to review those with you. Right now your managements objective is, make sure to get it cleared up, cleaned up and back to a normal status and a normal life as quickly as possible. But we are going to have some ongoing issues that we'll be addressing during Closed Session. I therefore, suggest and recommend that if J:%WPD00\BS\MIN96W0TES.02 Page 2 you have questions concerning what appears to be a liability or whatever related to it, that we hold those off until the Closed Session. Ed Hodges: Does the Directors know that the Districts operate 22 outlying pumping stations that pump wastewater to us for treatment. At approximately, 10:15 pm on Wednesday, February 21, the Control Center received an alarm that the Bay Bridge Pump Station, which is located on PCH,just west of Bayside Drive, had a low wetwell level. This signal caused the pumps to shut down. Shortly thereafter, the alarm was acknowledged by our Control Center clerk. At approximately 3:00 am on Thursday morning a resident in the area noticed that sewage was backing up in their home. They called 911 and no one responded. At about 4:28 am the City of Newport Beach Fire Department arrived. They called the City of Newport Beach Utilities Department. City crews arrived shortly thereafter and began interviews with the effected residents. Approximately 6:00 am on Thursday morning the city crews had identified the problem to be the Sanitation Districts. They then go to the Bay Bridge Pump Station and notify our Control Center that they are going to break into our Pump Station. At 6:00 am the City's Utility staff cut the padlocks and enter the station. They notice that the pumps were off. They immediately recognize how to start the equipment. They turn the pumps on and within a few minutes the spill was relieved. At about 6:38 am the Districts Maintenance crews arrived at the Pump Station and began to troubleshoot the problem. It's during this time that the Pump Station is run on a manual mode. We also arrived on the scene to help with the spill assessment and assist with the clean up. We noticed that fortunately the debris was very minimal. What I'd like to do is briefly go through some slides. SLIDE PRESENTATION (narration by Ed Hodges could not be heard) Nancy Wheatley: I want to talk about what happened at the scene on Thursday morning. I arrived at the office about 7:00 am on Thursday morning and James Cowan, who is with the Environmental Management Division and is responsible for our compliance activities for our NPDS permit came in about 7:15 am and reported to me that there was a spill on-going in Newport Beach and that it was a result of the Bay Bridge Pump Station and that Maintenance had already responded to it. I immediately informed Blake Anderson of the situation and Blake assigned Michelle Tuchman, the Director of Communications and I to go out to the scene and coordinate the Districts participation in this event. We went out to the scene immediately. When we arrived there, the Newport Beach Fire Department had an Incident Command Center in place and they were in fact responsible for the scene. This is one of the emergency vehicles they had there and this is the back of the second one where they are fully equipped with all kinds of papers, forms and telephones. All of us had our portable phones in our pockets and they were ringing periodically and we'd all take them out to see who was ringing. They were responsible for coordination of all the activities at the scene. The Fire Department with the assistance of the Newport Beach Utilities had been around to all the homes in the area to determine the extent of the back-up into the homes. They had also provided an initial estimate of how much sewage had spilled into the bay which they concluded was approximately 6,000 gallons. They had identified a stretch of homes (you'll find maps at the back of the letter to the Regional Board) which indicates J1WPDOCt8SW1N96W0TES.02 Page 3 where the effected homes actually were. The Fire Department was going door to door attempting to either see if the owner was home or to find out how to get a contact and get into each of the homes. When Michelle and I arrived at the scene there were representatives from both print and TV media at the scene. All of the major TV stations were there at some point during the morning. They were interviewing residents, they were interviewing clean-up crew, during the morning while I was there, I spoke with representative from each of the major media. I understand, although I have not seen it, that I was on Channel 2, 4, 7, 9 and OCN. I have to say that we were helped out by the fact that there was both an execution and a shooting so that our billing was probably somewhat lower than it might have been otherwise. The reports that we had on the event were also helped considerably by our approach at the scene. I want to also say that the Newport Beach folks were very helpful. The Fire Department had the scene very well under control when we were there. They had information, we had information. Michelle Tuchman put on green rubber boots and started going door to door with Monica Messier (sp7) of the Orange County Health Department to talk to each of the residents about what the situation actually was. Monica was there to talk about health risks, Michelle was there to be a representative of the Districts and provide names and phone contacts and do hand holding and whatever else the people needed at that point. The Fire Department had also prepared a list of clean-up organizations that were available and there were some crews already on site. So, as the residents were getting up and as they were saying, "oh my gad, I've got sewage in my home", there were in fact resources there for them. During the morning and later one we heard from a number of people that the fact that people were there and were responsive to their concerns was very helpful. The Fire Department took the major responsibility for clearing each of the homes for determining which homes had been effected and which homes had not. They also took information which we had provided to them and they were also giving information to each of the homeowners. We had asked that each of Th homeowners contact someone to begin cleaning up the spill as soon as possible, because of course, one of the most important things is to get the water out of there as soon as possible to minimize the damage. We also suggest that they contact their own insurance agencies and the Fire Department also gave them a contact for the Districts. I had also talk by phone with Blake and with Tom Woodruff early that morning and had requested that we have a representative from our claims agent, Carl Warren on site as soon as possible and Ed Garbo from Carl Warren did arrive on site and did begin talking with residents when he arrived. Let me show you some additional pictures of what was going on. There was some sewage that was spilled into the bay and the estimate, as you'll see in the letter, is about 36,000 gallons. The spill into the bay was the least significant part of what happened. The sewage into the homes is clearly the most difficult part of this incident. There was sewage on the streets but as Ed Hodges mentioned there weren't a lot of rags and other kinds of debris in it. There was fecal matter, there were sewage solids. SLIDE PRESENTATION As I mentioned to you earlier, there are companies that are trained in doing this kind of on-site clean up and this was one of the ones that was there and available and working with the homeowners. Ultimately, the Fire Department had a list of 16 homes which JAVVPD0C\BS\M1N9MN0TES.02 Page 4 were affected by the spill to varying degrees. Most of it was confined to the bathroom areas, so a shower or a tub might have been dirty and contaminated, it might have overflowed and gotten the throw rugs or whatever else people had in the bathroom. If there was carpeting in the bathroom that might have been soaked. That was the extent of the damage in most of the homes. There were some homes where there was additional flooding outside the bathroom and therefore additional carpeting that was wet. The quick action that was taken, I think probably minimized damage. There are 2 homes of the 16 homes that the Fire Department identified which were seriously flooded and sustained more significant damage. If you look at the list from our claims agent, you'll find that there are 19 homes on there. The discrepancy is that there were some people that simply had dirty bathtubs and got out the Clorox and the Lysol and did the cleaning themselves that we probably will not hear from. By noon, all of the activity at the site had been completed. The Fire Department had closed the Incident Command Center. Michelle and Monica had been to talk with most of the homeowners at least once. Mr. Garbo was making his rounds and it was taking him a bit longer because he needed to talk about claims. There had been someone in each of the homes that had been affected by that time. One of the things that I was most concerned about as the morning went on was that there would be homes where we won't able to identify someone to let us in. We clearly did not want to let that situation go on for any period of time. Tom Woodruff had worked with Newport Beach on a contingency plan if we have to get into a home, so we were able to do that as well. Before I turn over to Bob, I just want to say that we owe a great debt of thanks to Newport Beach because they were good partners in the response to this, both the Fire Department and the Utility Department. I think the agencies worked will together. The Health Department was there and coordinated well with us. The Health Department wasn't able to get out and post the beaches or post the docks actually where the spill was affected so the lifeguards came over. It was an example of public agencies working together and that part of it was very good. With that I'm going to turn it over to Bob Dolan to talk about the Operations Center issues and the issues that he sees for the spill. Bob Ooten: The Operations Department is responsible for 24 hour a day monitoring of the 22 pump stations. We received the alarm, the clerk called the acting shift supervisor in, they pulled up the screen and reviewed the graphics and acknowledged the alarm, basically silencing it. So the low wetwell alarm and their first consideration was to protect the pumping equipment. Low water alarm means that normally we pump wastewater over a range and this alarm says that the water level is below that normal operating range, so their concern was for the equipment. The checked equipment, the graphic, the equipment was all off and they thought their job was done and they took now further action on this alarm that night, from 10:00 pm until 6:00 in the morning. A couple of important issues: a few years ago we computerized the pump station monitoring system and this so-called low water alarm status was changed in that status. We used to have a manual system. The low water alarm in the old system was viewed as a critical alarm and in this system it's viewed as a noncritical alarm. We took no further action with something this important. Try to understand why the Control Center Clerk or the Operations Supervisor took no further action from 10:00 pm until 6:00 in the morning. The acting shift Supervisor questioned the clerk and her training led her JIWPD0CtBSW➢N96W0TES.02 Page 5 believe that this was not an important alarm. When they receive them in the Control Center off times, the Pump Station corrects itself and goes back on-line, business as usual. Their concern is about the equipment, so they did not query the computer further and dependent upon the computer system to give them system to give them further information and it did not concerning that pump station. As issue that we're talking about is existing state law requires operation supervisors and operators of waste or treatment plants to hold prescribed certification levels. That night the acting shift supervisor was a Senior Plant Operator and he holds one grade certification level lower than an Operation Supervisor. I had previously orally cleared this with the State Board in what I thought was an situation and that's going to be discussed by the Regional Water Quality Control Board, they are concerned about that issue. The central issue is whether persons of lower level certification grade can act for their bosses and it's my opinion that they can. We're discussing any appropriate disciplinary action, if any is deemed necessary. Our short term recovery plan is two phases, we've begun retraining of the staff in the Control Center and anyone that is responsible for monitoring the systems in the Control Center. That began last Friday evening and continued through the weekend. We've developed a plan to retrain all staff that would be available for duty in that service in the pump station monitoring system in other parts of the Control Center and there's other short term training portions. We've also begun to evaluate as a staff, how we can make the computer system and the operation protocol more bullet proof in the future. And those same two things, we have an immediate plan of four weeks (one to four weeks)for those items and them we'll be evaluated long term measures for operations protocol, computer system modifications, and future training that we deed necessary. Ed Hodges: I just wanted to conclude my presentation with telling you that the maintenance crews responded at 6:38 am and that at 7:00 am we had identified the problem and had started work on the remediation of that problem. We had installed a temporary bubbler line and returned the pump station back to automatic operation. By 11:00 am the bubbler tube had been repaired and the station was put back into normal operation. Bob talked a little bit about some of the recovery plan from the Operations standpoint, and I wanted to tell you a little bit about what were doing from a Maintenance standpoint on recovery plan. We immediately initiated a policy to go out and check all of our bubblers in all of our pump stations. We are a few days away from completing that task. We have completed the critical pump stations and we have found no signs of additional problems. We'll be putting that on a more routine check as part of our normal maintenance. We are also working through some recommendations for some additional alarm points and as we finalize those we'll be getting with Operations. In particular right now we're looking at the possibility of a new alarm point that would identify not only the wetwell level but the pump operation and even the affluent flow, so that after a certain period of time if it notices no affluent flow going out the pipe, it would send another alarm to Operations saying, are you sure that this is the action you want to take. Bob talked to you a little bit about the training that his staff is getting. In working with Engineering, Dave Ludwin and I are looking at different additional sensing hardware needs. One of the concepts that we're coming up with is the possibility of a high level censor that if the water level were to rise and hit that, it would send another signal or start a pump and get the flow down. We're looking at some of the hardware JAWPDOMBSWIN96WOTES.02 Page 6 that is available right now and we'll be making a decision shortly on how to best implement that. One of the other things that probably goes a little unnoticed is, we had a big debriefing session after this was over and put all this stuff down. All of this sluff is going into our Integrated Emergency Waste Response Plan. With that I'll turn it to Nancy. Nancy Wheatley: As you can imagine the response to this is far from over and let me just conclude with two comments. Michelle is continuing to hear daily, perhaps hourly from homeowners with concems. One of the big issues for people is that they have had sewage in their home and they are worried to what that means to them. We have hired a Hygienist to help answer those questions so that people feel that they have someone independent that they can go to and that there's a resource available to them. The other issue is the issue of our regulatory compliance with our NPDES permit. Unfortunately, this event happened right after a permit violation for an instantaneous level of settleable solids which occurred on Sunday, February 18. Again, our response from a technical prospective in terns of meeting reporting deadlines and various other things was somewhat less than stellar and so we need to look at those issues. That event of the exceedence of a permit limit and this event of a sewage spill are both reportable to the regulatory agencies; the Regional Water Quality Control Board and the U.S.E.P.A. They have permit implications and we take those very seriously. The Regional Board has been on site from Thursday through today, not necessarily ever hour of every day, but staff from the Regional Water Quality Control Board has been interviewing Districts staff, they have been interviewing individuals without their supervisors there and have been gathering a great deal of information about what went on. They've reviewed our letter, they've reviewed our calculation and we will be hearing further from them. We expect that they will come and talk with us when they have completed their investigation and we can discuss further what the possibilities are but we do expect to hear further from the Regional Board and potentially from EPA and as I said, the event is not yet over and we will keep you informed. If there's time, we would also take questions, or we can hold them for later. TLW: We have not received any claims from any of the 17 homeowners. We had Carl Warren out there the first day within hours making contact and they all have their information. Lets talk in terms of generics here, in terms of the responsibility of the Districts from a legal prospective. The first starting block is, just because there is a sewage spill does not mean that the Districts is liable for the damage - now that's a very tough proposition to swallow from members of the public because it's very ugly situation. But you've heard me present that previously where there's instances where the Districts had no occasion to know that there was some responsibility, that there was something wrong, that we were doing something wrong and therefore, the back up has caused the damage. The laws pretty clear on it, that we are responsible. That's the starting block, however, you loose that position if in fact, it is shown that the Districts facilities were known to have a defect or something of that nature and we didn't do anything about it. That doesn't apply to this case. There was absolutely no knowledge, no warning whatsoever. The slide that Ed's shown here has been described to me how you have to go and find it by taking off the cover and hanging a guy upside down into the wetwell, look behind a comer block and then he'd see that this JAWPDOMBSUN96WOTES.02 Page 7 hose was broken. There's probably no negligence there. The other thing is if in fact, we were aware that it was there, and there was something wrong, and didn't respond. There in lies the question whether the alarm system on the computer is sufficient. The General Manager has put the word out, conferred with me and all, that the first and foremost is to basically address this with the people who are out there and try to get it resolved. There are three basic positions: one is to tell all 17 people to send all there bills no matter what they are and we'll pay for them; the second position is don't pay any of the bills and we would figure out who's at fault and make everybody carry the load; and the third as you can imagine is somewhere in between. As Nancy and the staff have pointed out to you, most of these 14 or 15 of these, the damages are really quite minimal in comparison, somewhere between maybe $500 and $5,000 depending on carpet cleaning or carpet damage and it needs replacement. The first thing that's been done is to get someone out there and get all the places cleaned up, that controls, limits and mitigates the damages. We're recommending, your claims resolution has authority for a committee of the General Manager, Finance Director and myself to settle any claims up to $50,000., so there's authority to make these things happen and the General Managers recommendation which I join in is, for the small claims we'd spend more arguing about them, we want to get them paid and make those people happy and help them get back to there normal life. By the same token, I've advised the staff manager repeatedly about this in the last 48 hours, that we have to protect the Districts position against the remote, and we have no indication of this at the present time, but I can just tell you from past experience from public agencies that my office represents, that there's a lot of people who could take advantage, called the proverbial rip-off or scam, and say well I want my house rebuilt or say, all of a sudden my grand piano is missing - preposterous claims. We're going to protect the Districts position on that and it could conceivably be that, if there are huge claims out there, that we'll be in some position of having to contest it and figure out who's at fault. There are at least two other potential points of responsibility other than the Districts. Part of this project is in a condominium that is built low, and they have an on-site pump station that has to lift the waste out of these places, high enough to get into the City of Newport Beach sewer line that comes over to our pump station. Their station was required and each home was required by the City of Newport Beach to have an anti-backflow device so that if sewage backs up, it hits the valve and doesn't go further, it doesn't go into the houses. You just saw that R got into 17 houses, what happened to those back-Flow valves? And what happened at the pump station? Those are things we don't know yet. We're exploring them, and I'm just point them out. We're going to work to get these resolved, but we're going to protect the Districts position and not unduly pay outrageous sums. It the Districts Directors have any question about the policy of paying any nominal claims, then I'd like review it with you in Closed Session. Otherwise, the Managers intent is to try to get rid of the very nominal claims and address the major claims on a case by case basis. Don and I think we can bring this to closure. VJC: This is a District 5 item only but it was brought to the whole board because Districts were involved. J:=PD0C\BS\IVI1N96\N0TES.02 Page 8 DFM: That is the extent of the report. Public relations is an important aspect of this. We think that, as Tom said, most of the claims will be relatively small, you're reminded that we're self insured. There may be one or two claims that are substantial, but beyond that we think they're not. We wonder why we haven't heard yet or seen a claim, but we haven't and we'll see. So again, if you have any concerns about us settling as many of these as we can as quickly as we can, let us know. I would like Mahin now to make that presentation that was done as CASA, we think it would be of interest to you. Presentation by Mahin Talebi and Adriana Renescu on "How to be Business Friendly". Nancy Wheatley: Can I add one thing? The program has won awards, as I think the Directors as well aware but there's additional recognition which is actually happening this Friday. USEPA on a national level has a program called the Common Sense Initiative, which is attempting to take good ideas from around the county and promote them as a way of maintaining environmental quality while reducing regulation and they have called our Source Control folks to ask if they could come out here and talk with them about our program, recognizing that it's one of the best programs in the country. ff6c - Report by General Counsel: TLW: Just briefly a couple of items. Just for information, we've put in agenda packages that were mailed to you the Annual Litigation Status Report both where we had to prosecute some of the administrative proceedings for Source Control that you just heard about as well as the defense of the others. If anybody has any questions about that, please feel free to let me know and I'll be happy to do it. Also, we put a separate flyer in the folder tonight for distribution on this big lawsuit that we have here on the river, we have 29 lawsuits and we managed to get out of those without having to contribute anything -the total settlement was over $2 million but we got the Districts out without paying anything. However, we have occurred a great amount of legal expense and at one point the insurance company said, 'yeah no problem we'll pay it , after we fought with them for a long time, but then they never did. And so, it got to the braking point a couple of weeks ago but we're pleased to announce that finally, with our threats, finally submitted a check to the Districts, which you've seen here in your package, for just under $50,000 which reimburses the Districts 100% of the cost that were incurred in the defense. On Friday of last week, I had occasion to be in Sacramento and meet with Assemblyman Kerpringles(sp?) staff relative to EB2109 which is a comprehensive bill in which he's proposing to take every water and sewer agency in this county and form a new agency called the Orange County Water and Sanitation District with ten directly elected Directors, two from each of the five geographical boundaries of the supervisorial districts. The meeting was intended to basically provide information relative to our Districts, how they're organized and how they're structured and the plans that are under study for the consolidation from where we are now to even one single district, as well as to try to gather where the assemblyman was proceeding on this. It was a very rewarding investment, we had a hour with the staff and we could have taken longer if we needed it. We got to present and talk about every issue. The focus is principally J.'UPDOMMMIN96WOTES.02 Page 9 one major area and that is the pending application before LAFCO. The City of Garden Grove and the Garden Grove Sanitary District has been pending for 25 months. LAFCO just continued it again until May, which has really got the speaker of the assembly outraged and I will tell you in no uncertain terms, the bill he has proposed is essentially just to get around LAFCO. By the way, parenthetically, I'll tell you there's another bill pending in the legislation which is designed to just abolish all LAFCO statewide - that's not going to make it anywhere, but there's a bill there. The second area of focus is the public agencies who have significant excess reserve funds, especially if they're invested in such things as real estate or whatever nature. He raised the subject, not me. Thirdly, it's the consolidation of the small water districts of the south county which is an area focused. It was a bit comforting to have them indicate that really these sanitation districts are not the subject of or a focus although as I said, this bill/some bill is going to go through and if there's no effort on the part real interested party, we could get caught in front of the steam roller. The speakers bill is limited to Orange County and you can't realistically expect any member of the assembly to cut against their speaker for a bill that has no plus or minus to them in Alameda County or Los Angeles County or any other county. They did acknowledge that the bill in its present form will not be the final bill, that's a given. We'll keep you posted on that, it's a bill of extraordinary importance to this District and they've promised to keep an open mind. #7 - Minutes deemed approved #8 - Payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts Roll Call Vote - motion carries. #9(b)(c) - Consent Calendar VJC: Please note that item #9a has been removed from the Consent Calendar. Motion carries. #11fa VJC: Committee minutes. We've lumped all the Committee Minutes into one item. Is there a motion on Item#11 a? Moved, seconded, deemed approved. What we're going to do here is start with the Committee Chairman who is going to give a report of the committee activity. We'll start off with Chairman of the PD&C Committee, John. #11(b)(1 John Collins, Committee Chair: The item before us this evening deals with the maintenance building at Plant No. 2 which is approximately $5 million. An areas for fire protection signage and water distribution modification systems at Plants No. 1 and 2, this is to insure that we will not have backflow Fountain Valley. modification facility, this is a replacement facility to use from a cost effective and less hazardous chemical and emergency J:\WPD0CtBSW11N90W0TES.02 Page 10 disinfectant. The November PDC Committee authorized 7 bids were received, the bids ranged from $13 million to a little over$16 million. The successful low bidder was Sverdrup Civil, Inc. There was correction, as it was noted in your Directors package, it was an addition correction so it was not anything of any importance, so that correction was made and again there bid is $13,196,500.00. The Engineering estimate on this was $15,200,000. There are also two addendums to this item that were caused by the request of the City of Huntington Beach. One was to extend the bid so that we could make those request changes and we did so by one week. And the other one was to So the recommendation this evening is Item A, which is the approval of 1 and 2, and B which is the award of contract. If there are no questions, I'd like to make the motion to approve 11 81, B, C & D. Seconded - Deemed Approved. VJC: Report of the OMTS Committee. #11(b) (2) Pat McGuigan, Committee Chair: As you all probably remember back in September. We submitted a proposal to SCAQMD for a rather interesting project having to do with Compressed Natural Gas. Part of that project is being done now in advance to provide the activity that is necessary for some long range planning so that when everything does come together it will be on line at the appropriate time. The two items that are on your agenda are kind of linked together. The first part is an actual contract that will be submitted that will link together all of the appropriate parties for the heavy-duty truck demonstration project. Part of that will be reimbursed in the amount of$447,000. by SCAQMD (that's part (a) on your agenda). The second part is a MOU between the appropriate parties and because we are doing it before the 1st of March, AQMD is giving us a bonus of$15,000. So, I would like to move that we recommend that adoption of these two items: the signing of the contract (which I've already done as District No. 1 Chair), and also the MOU that will provide us with $15,000. That was a motion Mr. Chairman. VJC: The motion is item 11(2)(a)(b) -motion and seconded, deemed approved. #11(b)(31471 VJC: George Brown is ill tonight and asked me to make the report from the FAHR Committee. There are a number of items, Items 11 (3) - (7). I'll go through them briefly. The first item is a motion to recommend extending benefit coverage to employees who work less thana 40 hour week. This was passed by the committee on a 4 -2 vote, it was not a unanimous consent. We have staff here if there is additional discussion, but I'd like to go through all the items. J:\WPDOC\BS\N11N96WOTES.02 Page 11 The second item was a recommendation to approve the joint agreement with the County of Orange, the official Investment pool participants committee. That passed with one nay vote by John Gullixson. The third item considered was renewal of boiler and machinery insurance and the committee recommended the selection of Kemper Insurance Group or American Manufacturers Mutual. The next item is the report from the Treasurer which talked about, number one, a review of the Districts portfolio, we had an outside consultant come in and review to make sure our investments were per the investment policy adopted by the Board. We also had a report on the success, I believe the annualized rate of return for the quarter covered was approximately 12%, so we had a 3% during the quarter, that's because a portion of the Districts funds were invested long term and as you know there's been a considerable recovery in the longer term - part of the yield curve. The next item was a mid-year report that was prepared by staff looking at the performance of the half year. We had considerable discussion about this and there's some additional work on it. The final item being considered was that we reviewed the budget assumptions presented by staff in preparation of next years budget. The committee made one recommendation and that was the interest rate assumption and that was adjusted and recommended here. Is there any discussion on any of the items? If not, I would make the motion of approval on Items 11(3) -(7). Discussion requested re, Items 11(3). 1 would then like to modify the motion to approve Items 11(4) - (7). Deemed approved. #11 fbl(31 Mike Peterman: The recommendation before you tonight is to approve a pro-rated part- time benefit using the following formula of 20-29 hours employees would receive a benefit equivalent of 50% of the benefit from 30 - 39 hours employees would receive a benefit equivalent of 75%. What are the benefits to the Districts for approving this? They are two-fold I believe. One is to reduce overtime by increasing temporarily part- time hours on a temporary basis and we can avoid the cost of paying time and a half and overtime. But the second point, and that is what I believe is the most important, and that is job-sharing. I think most of you are familiar with job-sharing. But we have an example in our Department. We have one of our top compensation analysts who wants to return to work on a part-time basis (20 hours) and she is in charge right now of compensation and performance management. I can break-off the performance management piece, by splitting the position, hiring someone in at the bottom of the range saving about $7,500 per year and still keep one of my valuable employees happy and accommodate her needs returning from matemity. That's what I believe is the biggest benefit. This is not precedence setting. 38% of the cities in Orange County have some form of part-time benefits and 75% of the private sector also does this according to a survey that we have. Part-time benefits provide management with just JAWPD0VBSWIIN96W0TES.02 Page 12 one more tool to affectively and efficiently manage the workforce by attracting and retaining the most valuable employees. VJC: The other side of the issue - I believe in the committee the discussion on the con side was that instead of doing this blanket with all employees, there was consideration that this should be done on a case by case basis for the convenience of the Districts as decided by the General Manager and not be blanket applied to all existing part-time employees. That was where the no vote was coming from. Sheldon Singer: Has there been any numbers for the last six months or last year on the difference between overtime and if we had this on total costs? VJC: I believe as I recall, there was a $13,000. increased cost to the Districts by extending the benefits. JAW: That's right, but we've also done some analysis of how much overtime we might be able to save and I know Bob Ooten looked at that and as I recall, Bob you had a number of about $50,000 in overtime cost savings. Questionstcomments could not be heard. Mike Peterman: We have 13 part-time employees right now and the projected impact is anywhere from $38,000 to $50,000 depending on how many hours they work and at what level of the formula they take place in. JAW: That's the increase in cost of the consequence benefits and that might be offset by savings for example in overtime in Operations and savings for example, that Mike pointed out in job sharing. So, it looks like to me that it's probably a wash, but it provides management with more flexibility. Questions/comments could not be heard. JAW: Let me respond to that. While we could apply this on a case to case basis, currently, the policies and procedures available to the executive staff don't allow for any type of pro-rated benefit. So, there is not a discretion now in our policies and procedures. If you wanted to give us the discretion that would be fine, but right now the policies written in a way that do not provide that discretion. VJC: The vote on the Committee was to recommend this -the opposing people recommend that it be granted to the General Manager on a case by case basis and not a blanket approval. What's your pleasure. Discussion by John Collins could not be heard. VJC: Motion is to recommit to Committee for legal opinion and financial analysis. Motion, seconded - 1 opposition -we will send it back to the Committee. JAWPDOMBSNIN96WOTES.02 Page 13 Presentation by Controller, Mike White re Mid-Year Financial and Operations Report and 1996/97 Budget Assumptions. #13Ib1 VJC: Executive Committee Report -we discussed the County Commingled Investment Pool, the recommendation after discussion with a 7 -2 vote was that the Committee recommends to the Board was to accept the County's plan of readjustment. Are there any questions/comments? Don Griffin - comments could not be heard John Collins -the choice for us this evening is a binary choice. We've already selected the "A", do we go ahead with this plan or do we back out of this plan? it will net us or could net us 100%. If we say that we do not want to do this, and do not ratify this plan t this time, we could end up subsequently less than even "B" selection because it could put us out of the category. John Gullixson -comments could not be heard. BPA: The action before you today is regarding the Joint Agreement not the Plan of Adjustment, although the Plan of Adjustment, when eventually adopted in this calendar year will reflect many of the elements that are present in the Joint Agreement. The Joint Agreement specifically protects the rights of all third parties including the Option B Participants. The Joint Agreement is neutral with respect to the Option B Participants. Under the Plan of Adjustment the County has provided a reserve account for the potential eventually of the Option B Participants successfully suing the County and its causes of action against the County. Early on in the summer of 1995, after the Pooled Participants had split into the Option A and Option B camps, there was considerable discussion between the Attorneys of the Option A Participants and the Option B Participants of how to move forward because we were no longer on the same course of events. The Option B Attorneys asked, and we agreed, that the Option B Participants Attorneys would negotiate on there own behalf with respect to the Plan of Adjustment and other issues. The Joint Agreement is for Option A Participants only and since we were not negotiating on behalf of the Option B Participants, there was no way that we could address their situation in the Joint Agreement with the exception of making it neutral with respect to their treatment. That is the facts of the Joint Agreement. It is neutral with respect to Option B Participants. What the Joint Agreement does is it does remove recourse against the County the Option A Participants who approved this Joint Agreement. That has significant importance in the County's ability to restructure its debt this summer. It must have those allowed claims removed from their account as part of the restructure. The other thing that it does is that it does provide a significant amount of new cash to the County as part of their restructuring for this summer. It's imperative to all of us, that the bond holders and the vendors of the County are ultimately dealt with in the outstanding issues that would be settled in the middle of this year by virtue of the Joint Agreement. The Joint Agreement reflects the J:\WPD0CSS1tv11N96W0TESo2 Page 14 legislation that was approved in Sacramento in September which took about two weeks to get that through. The delay that occurred back in the summer in the approval of the Joint Agreement was because the original draft of it as it went up to Sacramento was shifted enough so that it had to be re-drafted. What the Joint Agreement for the County Sanitation Districts is it advances our position in the litigation proceeds from Merrill Lynch and others and you'll have decide for yourself what's the most likely method that the Sanitation Districts will have any return on the continuing loses from the investment pool. Will it be from the funds within the County Government that do not exist or through the potential of revenues from the litigation against Merrill Lynch and others. What will occur for the Sanitation Districts if this Joint Agreement is approved is that we'll advance our position, we'll lose recourse on those allowed claims, which is a significant thing to give up, for the County as an agent to fully allow the claims, is a major hurdle that you have to get through in court. So it is a significant give up on our side. But we will get that advancement in the litigation proceeds, and we will receive approximately $8 million in a combination of County administered accounts and withheld proceeds which are part of the deal that will come over once the Joint Agreement has been approved by Judge Ryan. With respect of the issue of trust, the court of jurisdiction is Judge Ryan. Judge Ryan ruled that trust did not exist and it is purely speculative on anyone part in terms of what reversal may eventually occur down stream. The court of jurisdiction has ruled that there trust, and I could tell you that the Orange County Investment Pool Committee, in pulling out the 77% of the losses in May, would not be happening today, if Ryan's ruling had not been delayed. We as Option A Participants receive 77% of the cash back, it was still existing in the bank and another 3% amounted to another$13 million. This agency has significantly advanced its cash position by being Option A Participants and it's my recommendation from what I've seen in my year and a few month on the Investment from Merrill Lynch and others. The first go to the Investment Pool Participants with the schools having super priority for the first $55 million. Barry Denes: Comments/questions could not be heard. TLW: A couple of things could happen. We have a major piece but not enough to effectively veto the approval of the Joint Agreement. Our slice isn't that big. But, if we did not sign the agreement, the answer is No, we do not become a "B", in fad, what is going to happen is there would be a third class still out there. Under the terms of the Plan of Adjustment as they are going to pick up the plans of this Joint Agreement, the A-'s would not get to share then in the litigation proceeds and they also would have to probably pursue their rights independently through their own litigation to enforce the terms of the first settlement agreement of April. One of the other points that hasn't been raised here in terms of the proverbial wit pro quo that has been exchanged is that the County, as a part of this agreement, has agreed that it will not endorse or advocate or support or request any legislation to take away either property taxes or other revenues from the cities or the special districts and as we know, there are a handful of bills put in last year and needless to say, this District could be a big target of that and that's part of the deal is that the County will withdraw and not seek that legislation to raid those revenues. So that's got a monetary value. JAWPDOCtMMINMNOTES.02 Page 15 Barry Denes: Further comments /questions could not be heard. VJC: Barry, I think that we have lost our ability to file with the lawsuit against the County when we selected to be an "A". TLW: One of the provisions of the settlement agreement addresses some of the legislation that was enacted last year, and that is if there is not a substantial approval of the Plan of Adjustment, the Governor gets to appoint a trustee. That trustee is empowered with great authority including structuring a Plan of Adjustment that he carves out and also he has or would have authority to restructure any of the claims, whether they be A's, or B's or A-'s. So, all the parts are going to of the mercy of the trustee who will make whatever deal it takes to make the whole thing go away which is a total unknown. No one in this room, no one in the County, no one anywhere knows what is going to happen, in that case, the best thing we could do is guess. John Collin: It sounds like your on a effort to get to go to the B category. I don't think that's going to happen. I think if we have to look at the issue at hand, it's a decision, it's binary, it's one or the other. We either at this point ratify the Joint Agreement and give up what we give up and accept what we can accept or we don't and go into a but from what I understand it's less of a decision. No body likes this bankruptcy, no one likes the decisions that we have to make. We don't like it in the cities, we don't like it at the Sanitation Districts, I know the Supervisors don't like it from their standpoint. We have to make a decision based upon the facts that are presented to us. Given the facts that are given to us in the Joint Agreement and the back up of what we've discussed, my decision is to accept and ratify this decision because it gives us something, in my mind, better than the consequences of not doing it. Both of them, are unfair perhaps, both of them are unacceptable perhaps, but given the lesser of the two evils, it you want to look at it that way, I think that we should ratify it. That's a motion. Seconded. VJC: Jan did you want to make a comment? Jan DeBay: Comment could not be heard. John Gullixson: Comments could not be heard. VJC: Any other comments -All those opposed? 4 opposed. The chair rules this approved. #12 VJC: We will move onto Item #12. JAVVPD0C\BSWIIN96W0TES.02 Page 16 DFM: This is the continued discussion about the connection fees that you had before you, that you've had before you for about a year. Nancy Wheatley will address the issue and than once she has made her Staff Report, I would suggest that the gentlemen from Garden Grove then address you on their concerns and then Nancy could respond to that. Nancy Wheatley: Given the late hour, I will be very brief. There is a Staff Report in the package. As we have tried to make our way out of excess capacity charge. I guess I would observe that in some ways maybe sewage spills are a little better that excess capacity charges. I haven't been here quite so often on them. They're not better for the residents though. As we have tried to maintain the status quo and move forward with the new strategic plan which includes an opportunity to look all of the connection charges and to try and develop a fair system for all of our customers both residential and business. We continue to come across in how various kinds of business and industrial and commercial customers have been treated in the past. That was in fact what led staff to develop the excess capacity charge which was recommended to you last spring. With the repeal of the excess capacity charge and the return to the previous method, it turns out that the previous method had treated existing businesses and new businesses differently. New businesses were not charged an additional capital connection fee regardless of how much they increase their flow, whereas, a new business which came on line, if it was more than 50,000 gallons would be charged the connection fee. So you could have a new business come in at 51,000 gallons and pay a substantial sum of money and you could have an existing business increase their flow by 500,000 gallons and not pay anything at all. We concluded that it was unfair. We then had two choices: 1. is to charge the existing business; 2. not to charge the new business at least temporarily. We concluded, given all of the difficulty and implementation that the best thing to do at this point is to place a moratorium on these types of fees, pending the completion of the strategic plan in the capital connection study. We are recommending that there be no charges assessed until that study is completed. Al that time, we will have a system in place and it will be applied to all businesses fairly. Any new business which comes on line between now and the time that the new charging system is completed would be told that there would be a charge in the future. It will not be a retroactive charge so they won't have to pay two years at one time, but they will have to pay the fee at that time. We anticipate, although we don't know at this point that the charge will be an annual charge and that it will be accessed based upon flow. If flow increases it would go up, and if flow decreased it would go down. One final point, the recommendation is that, for new businesses which move to the County now, they need to know what the magnitude of that charge would be. What we have proposed is that we would guarantee those businesses that on an annual basis their charge would be no higher than the charge which would be accessed based on the excess capacity charge calculation. That's the fee that we repealed amortized over 10 years. Whatever the annual charge is, it would be no higher than that fee. We recommended using the excess capacity charge calculation because we continue to believe that it fairly reflects the Districts costs of providing capital facilities for businesses to handle flow and solids. That's the substance of the recommendation and if I can answer any questions, I would be happy to. J UPDOOBSNIN96WOTES.02 Page 17 VJC: Any questions of the staff? Okay. We have two gentlemen here to discuss this item. Mark Asturias, City of Garden Grove: I am here representing the Mayor and the City Council of the City of Garden Grove. I am the Economic Development Manager for the City of Garden Grove. We are supportive of everything that the Districts is doing in regards to the excess capacity charge, in fact, we applaud and support your current efforts and the recommendation that's before you tonight. What we are asking for however, is some further relief regarding the excess capacity charge method of calculation. We believe that with your previous policy, capacity charge calculation which was substantially lower than what is currently being proposed. As an example, tonight we have a business here who would have been charged under your previous policy somewhere in the area of$660,000. Under the proposed method they would be charged in excess of$1,400,000. So what we are asking basically is that if you, in fact, were to adopt the recommendation that is before you, that you establish the method of placing a cap in regards to the rate at your previous policy not at the proposed method of calculation that the staff has before you tonight. That is in fact the essence of my presentation. We are here supporting a business that is trying to move into our community and that is House Foods. House Foods is here tonight and the representative from their offices would like to speak to you on it. We are supporting them in their efforts. We hope that you would listen to them as well as listen to us and in fact, approve the recommendation before you, and consider our request to modify the method of rate calculation. Any questions? John Collins - questions/comments could not be heard. Mark Asturias: We are working with House Foods. They are not within a project area - I am the redevelopment agency. They are not within the redevelopment project area. We are working with them on expedition of permitting and relative to some city fees, we are providing some offsets at a city level. But, we can't obviously assist them on a fee that is in an excess of$800,000 differential between what would have originally been applied to them versus the new calculation that is being proposed. Richard Hertel, House Foods: I represent House Foods, a Japanese Tofu Manufacturer. They are moving from Los Angeles, perhaps some of you are familiar with them. They bought land in Garden Grove about three years ago. Tonight House Foods wanted to go on record, to ask the Board of Directors in their case specifically, to waive any excess capacity fee for their particular use. The reasons being are as follows: 1) House Foods has been a corporate citizen in Garden Grove for three years now. 2) Prior to buying the property, they hired a consulting firm by the name of John Brown, who is a renowned group of consultants that did a lot of the due diligence for House Foods, part of which was meeting with the different governmental authorities, including the Sanitation Districts. They were advised that there were certain fees involving connection fees, none of which were excess capacity fees. In fact, I've got some notes that say, basically how they determine what the fee was which was based on a square footage equated based on their building size about $67,000. The current ordinance does not stipulate an absolute excess capacity fee or any formula to calculate J:IWPD0C\BSWINg8W0TES.02 Page 18 such a fee, however, it does discuss on a case by case basis, some fee may be charged. The Sanitation District is discussing a fee for House Foods based on their usage. They use about 95,000 gallons per day of affluent. Based on that, there's been a equivalent dwelling unit method of calculation which was determined by, I believe it was staff, saying they would have to be paying a fee of about $660,000. - a big surprise to my client who had no idea that would be a possibility. The Sanitation Districts, over the years, I believe the case by case issue started in about 1983 and since that time it hasn't consistently implemented any kind of an excess capacity fee. In fact, out of the about 80 or 85 companies in Orange County that have flow in excess of 50,000 gallons, I don't know of any private companies that have had to pay an excess capacity fee. The Sanitation Districts staff advised us in a previous meeting that many of the companies over the years, that have been here for 20 to 25 years, who use many millions of gallons of water per day and sewer, that a portion of that fee has always been applied toward capital improvements. I think that House Foods prospective is that they will certainly agree to the same formula that Kimberly Clark for example, who uses 2,000,000 gallons a day, would pay. Whatever the fair charges for the entire people of Orange County is what they'd like to see. So, it's House Foods position as follows: Sanitation Districts should allow companies to obtain sewer permits during this study period without any excess capacity charge, thus, an existing connection or existing user will not be subject to any excess capacity charge. The logic here is clear- inconsistencies in the past in charging this fee have prompted the 18-month study. Until such time as a new ordinance is adopted, the Sanitation Districts should process all sewer applications as they have in the past, fairly, and without excessive user fees. Next, the Sanitation Districts never disclosed to House Foods, during the purchasing of the property, any formula relating to a capacity charge and I've got some notes to that effect that I can hand out to all of you as well. House Foods understands the needs for the Sanitation Districts to upgrade their system and have the people and the heavy users in Orange County pay their fair share. House Foods wants to do that. They have no problem paying the standard fees that all other companies in Orange County have paid over the years. Again, it was a pretty big surprise for them after doing a lot of due diligence that this fee would come up. We would appreciate that the Board this evening waive this on behalf of House Foods. In conclusion, I know you have this on the agenda, and you can make a decision on it. In a spirit on fairness and equity throughout, and a consistency throughout the users within Orange County, we propose that the excess capacity fee be waived in the case of House Foods. VJC: For discussion. I have a question of Nancy. If this business was in Los Angeles and is currently in Los Angeles, what is the Los Angeles equivalent excess capacity charge and fees? Nancy Wheatley: The research that staff had done, which was presented at earlier staff reports, is that the Los Angeles City and County fees are similar and somewhat higher than Orange County's excess charge which is the one that you repealed. San Diego County is considerably higher than ours. There are some small county's to the east which are less than ours. JAWPDOMMMIN96WOTES.02 Page 19 VJC: So, House Foods has operated in Los Angeles for a period of years, and therefore, would have been aware of what the excess capacity charge and the fee structure was in Los Angeles? Nancy Wheatley: Yes. John Collins - comments/questions could not be heard. Nancy Wheatley: There are were two different discussions. One would have been with Garden Grove and Director Singer can discuss that. I have talked with staff who discussed this matter at the time with House Foods. I am told by staff, including the previous Director of Technical Services because I was of course not here, that while they did not discuss formula for excess capacity, her best recollection is that they mentioned the fact that excess capacity charges would be applied to high flow users. I don't believe that there are any good notes on that conversation and I don't believe that staff had any particular knowledge of what the flow was. Sheldon Singer-comments could not be heard. Nancy Wheatley: Of the million + dollars, I would say on the order of 60 - 70% of that is associated with the solids with the . The much smaller proportion of it is associated with the flow. We have offered to House Foods to put them in touch with Anaheim Citrus or Hunt Wesson to talk about those kinds of things and to work with them in terms of technical assistance to try and figure out if they can reduce the solids. Because by far, the largest part of that $1.2 million fee is for solids. VJC: Any further questions? Staff recommendation that has been moved and seconded is that we hold the collection of excess capacity charges in advance. The maximum that it would be for anyone in the interim period and that the staff will come back with a recommendation and will not exceed that maximum amount at the completion of the study. Richard Hertel: I just wanted to ask a question, Mr. Chairman. May I ask a question of staff and maybe the Board of Directors as well. How many privately held companies in the last 10 years have paid an excess capacity charge on a case by case basis? Nancy Wheatley: That information was provided to Mayor Broadwater. I believe going there were five companies, one of which appears to be a private company, the others are principally desalters. Richard Hertel: So, that's one in the last 10 years? Comments / Questions could not be heard. Nancy Wheatley: In the last 6 or 7 years, there have been 5 entities in excess of 50,000 gallons which have come on line. There is not a match between those that have J:\WPD0CtBS\M1N96W0TES.02 Page 20 paid an excess capacity charge because I think one of them was paid as early as 1978. So there is not a match. Mr. Hertel's point is: the Sanitation Districts has not been fair in the way it has accessed excess capacity charges against high volume dischargers and that is true. That is what prompted staff to propose the excess capacity charge. When he says you haven't been treating everyone consistently, he's absolutely right. There's no argument there. The high volume dischargers have not been paying their fair share of the capital costs as compare with each of the residential customers who have come on line. Residential customers have paid proportionately more that these high volume dischargers. VJC: So, effectively, the residential customers have subsidized the large dischargers. Nancy Wheatley: Yes. John Collins - comments could not be heard. VJC: I believe there is a study coming back in an 18-month period? And it's been approved by the Board? It's 18 months from about 2 months ago? JAW: We just awarded the contract in March, so it will be 18 months from the contract award approximately. VJC: So about a year and a half. The questions been called - all in favor? Any opposed? I see unanimous approval of the Directors here. #14 VJC: I'm going to ask the staff to update us on the Landfill in a written report and we'll go to Executive Session. We have two items that are going to take about five minutes total and I'm going to hold Tom to that. Move to Closed Session. J:\WPDOGBSUNg6WOTES.02 Page 21 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1 , 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 , 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES JOINT BOARD MEETING FEBRUARY 28, 1996 TRICTS OF p992 � c v a 9pTFcl�N6�THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 ROLL CALL ` An adjourned meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1. 2.3. 5,6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County,California, was held on February 28, 1996, at 7:30 p.m., in the Dishnets'Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation His roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Not. 1,2,3,5,6,7, 11. 13,and 14 ` as lallows: ACTIVE ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO.l: �JL Pet McGuigan,Chair _ Ted R.Mariana James M.Fem/man,Chair pro tam _ Arthur Pony Z Mark A.Murphy _ Joanne Co.. _L Thomas R.Saherelli Jim Potts 1 Roper Stanton _ William G.Steiner DISTRICT NO.2: s_ Jam CMunn,Chair _ George Boon y Daniel T.Welch,Chair pro tam _ John M.Gulliseon Z Barry Danes — Bob Bell Z Bumle Dunlap _ Glenn Porker Norman Z.Grommet, _ Carol Downey 1 James H.Fiore Steve Anderson x Pat McGuigan Ted R.Moreno Mark A.Murphy Jet.Co.. y China Nomy _ Don Bankhaad Sheldon Singer George L.Vilest _IL Roger Stanton Whom G.Steiner Bob Zembl Tom Daly DISTRICT NO.h y Sal A.Saphen,Chair Harry M.Damon y Bumie Dunlap, Chair pro tam Glenn Porker 1 Wager Bowman Gall Kerry y George Brown Marilyn Bruce findings Z John Collins George Seen t James H.Flora Shave Anderson Z Don R.Griffin Pass Marshall 3� Victor Leipzig Rabin Bauer _L Wally Linn Eva G.Miner i Pat McGuigan Ted R.Moreno _JL Cana Henry Dan BeNhe nd y Margie L.N. James V.Evans f_ Sheldon Singer George L.Zlaket Roper Shown William G.Stei er J_ Charles Sylvia Robert WahNnam i Bob Zemel Tom Daly DISTRICT NO.B: Jan Debby,Chair John C.Cox,Jr. y Wlliam G.Steiner,Chair pm tam Boger Bunton John C.Co.,Jr. �_ An Debay DISTRICT NO.B: James M.Ferryman,Chair Arthur Perry, 1 An Debby.Chair pro him Joan C.Cox.Jr. 1 William G.Steiner Roper Stamen DISTRICT NO.7: Barry Hammond,Chair Mike Ward y Thames R.Si Chair pro Ism Jim Porte JL Jan Debby _ Joe C.Co..Jr. y James M.Ferrymen _ Arthur Perry Pal MCGwgan Ted R.Mo.. y Mark A.Murphy Joan.CoonD William G.Steiner Roger Stamgn DISTRICT W.11: Victor Leipzig, Chair Ralph Bauer SNrley DaMalf,Chair pro tam Ralph Bauer Roper Stanton Wilson G.Steet r DISTRICT NO. 13: John M.Gullixson,Chair Daniel T.Welch x Bob Zeroed,Chair pro rem Ton Daly Burnie Dump Glenn Parker _S_ Mark A.Murphy _ Joanne CopnR a William G.Steiner Roper Shown DISTRICT NO.14: 3 Thomas R.Sab.elli,Chair A.FbM �!L Mart A.Murphy,Chair pro tom Joemg Co e:s, Barry Hammond al Went y William 6.Stem. Raper Stamon Fear A.Swan Darryl Mill. .2- 2/28/96 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Don McIntyre, General Manager, Blake P. Anderson, Assistant General Manager-Operations, Judith A. Wilson, Assistant General Manager-Administration, Penny Kyle, Board Secretary, Mark Esquer, John Finias, Janet Gray, Ed Hodges, Steve Hovey, Patricia Jonk, Terri Josway, Steve Kozak, John Linder, David Ludwin, Greg Mathews, Pat McNally, Bob Ooten, Mike Peterman, Adriana Renescu, Gary Streed, Mahin Talebi, Michelle Tuchman, Dan Tunnicliff, Nancy Wheatley, Mike White, Paula Zeller OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Mark Asturias, Gary Grasser, Richard Hertel, Bill Knopf, Howard Slavin, Phil Stone, Brad Wilkinson ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file resolution of the Board of Supervisors re change in appointment of active and alternate representatives Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Resolution No. 96-8 from the Board of Supervisors re change in appointment of active and alternate representatives, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed, as follows: Districts Active Director Alternate Director 1, 2, 3, & 11 Roger R. Stanton William G. Steiner 5, 6, 7, 13 & 14 William G. Steiner Roger R. Stanton -3- 2/28/96 DISTRICT 2 Receive, file, and accept resignation of Mayor Joseph S. Barsa of the City of Villa Park and seatina first and second alternates to the Mayor Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the letter from Mayor Joseph S. Barsa of the City of Villa Park resigning from the Board of Directors of District No. 2, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the following first and second alternates to the Mayor be seated as members of the Board: District Active Director Alternate Director 2 Barry L. Denes Bob Bell ALL DISTRICTS Recognition of persons who wish to be heard on specific aaenda items Mr. Mark Asturias, Economic Development Manager of the City of Garden Grove, and Mr. Richard Hertel, Senior Vice President of Professional Real Estate Services representing House Food Industrial Co., Ltd, requested that they be recognized at the appropriate time for the agenda item considering adoption of a moratorium on determination and collection of excess capacity charges until a study has been completed and a method has been adopted. ALL DISTRICTS Presentation of Orange County Ena ein erina Council Engineering Achievement Award Vice Joint Chair Swan announced that at the annual meeting of the Orange County Engineering Council held earlier in the month, the Sanitation Districts' Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2 project was selected to receive the Engineering Achievement Award. He then recognized David Ludwin, Director of Engineering, who accepted the award. -4- 2/28/96 ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Joint Chair Vice Joint Chair Swan, acting for Joint Chair Cox who was absent, advised the Directors that the next Strategic Planning Meeting is scheduled for Saturday, May 4 between 9:00 am and noon. This meeting will be addressing water conservation and reclamation issues. The following tentatively scheduled upcoming meetings were then announced as follows: Operations, Maintenance, and Technical Services Committee -Wednesday, March 6, at 5:30 p.m. Planning, Design, and Construction Committee -Thursday, March 7, at 5:30 p.m. Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee - Wednesday, March 13, at 5:30 p.m. Executive Committee -Wednesday, March 20, at 5:30 p.m. ALL DISTRICTS Report of General Manager The General Manager recognized the Districts' Director of Technical Services - Nancy Wheatley, Director of Maintenance - Ed Hodges, and Director of Operations - Bob Oaten, who reported on the sewage spill incident that occurred on February 22 in Newport Beach. Mr. Hodges briefed the Directors on Districts' operations of 22 outlying pump stations that pump wastewater to our facilities for treatment. On February 21 at approximately 10:15 p.m. the Control Center Clerk received and acknowledged an alarm that the Bay Bridge Pump Station, located on Pacific Coast Highway west of Bayside Drive, had a low wet well level, causing the pumps to shut down. At approximately 3:00 a.m. on February 22, a resident in the area noticed sewage backing up in his home. He called 911 and no one responded. The City of Newport Beach Fire Department arrived on the scene at approximately 4:30 a.m., and immediately called the City of Newport Beach Utilities Department. City crews arrived shortly thereafter and began interviews with the effected residents. At approximately 6:00 a.m. on February 22 the city crews identified Sanitation Districts' equipment as the problem, went to the Bay Bridge Pump Station, and notified the Control Center they were going to cut the padlocks to enter the Districts' Pump Station. Upon entering they noticed the pumps turned off, recognized how to start -5- 2128/96 the equipment, and turned the pumps on and relieved the spill within a few minutes. At approximately 6:38 a.m. the Districts' maintenance crews arrived at the pump station to begin to troubleshoot the problem, as well as crews arriving on the scene to assist with the cleanup and spill assessment. He then gave a brief slide presentation. Ms. Wheatley reported that upon learning of the spill she immediately informed the Assistant General Manager of Operations, Blake Anderson, of the situation. The Director of Communications, Michelle Tuchman, and she were assigned to go to the scene immediately to coordinate Districts' participation in the spill. Upon arrival the Newport Beach Fire Department had an Incident Command Center in place and were responsible for the coordination of all activities at the scene. They estimated that approximately 6,000 gallons had spilled into the bay, and identified a stretch of homes the Fire Department was going door to door to check if the owner was home or to establish a point of contact in order to get into those homes. Representatives from print and TV media were also at the scene. Monica Mazur of the Orange County Health Department was also there to talk to each of the residents about health risks. Ms. Wheatley estimated that 36,000 gallons of sewage were actually spilled in the bay, streets and homes. Ultimately, the Fire Department had a list of 16 homes affected by the spill to varying degrees. Most were confined to the bathroom areas, causing a shower or tub to overflow onto whatever the people had in the bathroom on the floor. Some homes had additional flooding outside the bathroom and therefore additional damage. Two of the homes the Fire Department identified were seriously flooded and sustained significant damage. By noon all activity at the site had been completed and the Fire Department closed the Incident Command Center. Ms. Wheatley concluded that the Districts owe a great debt of thanks to the Newport Beach Fire Department and the Utility Department for being good partners in the response. Mr. Dolan reported that the Operations Department is responsible for 24-hours/day monitoring of the 22 pump stations. When the alarm was received, the clerk informed the acting shift supervisor. They both reviewed the graphics on screen and acknowledged the alarm. A low water alarm means that the water level is below the normal operating range and the concern is for the equipment. After checking the graphics and the equipment was turned off, both thought their job was done and took no further action on the alarm from 10:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. He noted a few years ago the pump station monitoring system was computerized and the low water alarm status was changed. The low water alarm in the manual system was viewed as a critical alarm; in the computerized system it's viewed as a non-critical alarm, thus no further action was taken. The acting shift supervisor questioned the clerk whose training led her to believe this was not an important alarm. When these alarms are received in the Control Center at off times, the pump station corrects itself and goes back on-line, business as usual. The primary concern is about the equipment, so no further computer inquiries were made by staff and depended on -6- 2f28/96 the computer system to give them additional information concerning that pump station if necessary. Mr. Hodges concluded his presentation by saying the maintenance crews responded at 6:38 a.m. and at 7:00 a.m. started work on the remediation of the problem. By 11:00 a.m. the bubbler tube had been repaired and the station was put back into normal operation. A policy was immediately initiated to check all bubblers in all pump stations, which will now be a routine part of normal maintenance. Also under consideration is the possibility of additional alarm points that would identify the wet well level, pump operation, and effluent flow and additional high level sensors. He further stated that a debriefing session was held after this was over and will be implemented into our Integrated Emergency Waste Response Plan. Ms. Wheatley then concluded that the Director of Communications is continuing to hear daily from homeowners with concerns. One of the major concerns is that since sewage was in their home, they are worried about what that means to them. The Districts have hired an industrial hygienist to help answer those questions. Another issue is regulatory compliance with the Districts' NPDES permit. The event is reportable to the regulatory agencies; the Regional Water Quality Control Board and the US EPA Thereare permit implications which staff takes very seriously. Staff from the Regional Board has been on site for several days interviewing Districts' staff, without their supervisors being present, and have been gathering information about what occurred. They've reviewed our letter of reported spill and our calculations, and we expect they will talk with us when their investigation is completed. General Counsel then reported on the legal issues concerning Districts' liability and claims for the homes damaged that would be forthcoming. The General Manager has directed to resolve the claims with those people as quickly as possible. There are three basic positions: (1) tell the claimants to send their bills, no matter what they are, and we'll pay for them; (2) don't pay any of the bills, figure out who is at fault, and make everybody carry the load; and (3) somewhere in between. Most of the damages are minimal, probably between $500.00 to $5,000.00. The current claims Settlement Resolution has authority for a committee of the General Manager, Finance Director and General Counsel to settle any claims up to $50,000.00, so there is authority to resolve these quickly, and the General Manager's recommendation is to pay the small claims without regard for determining full responsibility at this time, in furtherance of goodwill and good public policy. The Districts must protect their position on the larger claims for remote possibilities of false or inflated claims. Additionally, the Districts must be in a position to contest any claim or to place responsibility equitably upon other parties who may be at fault. Some of the larger claims are for homes that are in a condominium complex built low with an on-site, privately owned and operated pump station that has to lift the waste out of these places high enough to get into the City of Newport Beach's sewer line -7- 2/28/96 that connects to our pump station. Each home was also required by the City of Newport Beach to have an anti-backflow device to prevent sewage backing into the houses. This is being investigated and the Districts' position will be protected so that unsubstantiated sums are not paid. The General Manager then recognized Mahin Talebi, Source Control Manager, and Adriana Renescu, Senior Engineer, to provide the Directors with their US EPA national award-winning presentation on "How to be Business Friendly". ALL DISTRICTS Report of General Counsel The General Counsel referred the Directors to the Annual Litigation Status Report that was included in their agenda packages. He also briefly reported on a memorandum included in their meeting folders that evening regarding 29 lawsuits along the Santa Ana River whereby the Districts were successful in getting all legal expenses incurred due to the lawsuits reimbursed. Mr. Woodruff further reported that recently he met with Assemblyman Curt Pringle's staff regarding AB2109, which is a comprehensive bill being proposed to dissolve all existing water and sewer agencies in Orange County and to form a new agency entitled Orange County Water and Sanitation District, with ten directly-elected Directors, two from each of the five geographical boundaries of the supervisorial districts. The meeting was intended to provide information relative to the Districts, such as how they're organized and operated, and to review the plans that are under study for the consolidation of the nine districts. Assemblyman Pringle's primary focus is on the application before LAFCO involving the City of Garden Grove and the Garden Grove Sanitary District, which has been pending for 25 months. The second area of focus is the public agencies who have significant excess reserve funds, especially if they have invested in such things as real estate. The third area of focus is the consolidation of the small water and sanitary districts of South County. The speaker's bill is limited to Orange County. General Counsel stated he would keep the Directors apprised of the situation as it further develops. DISTRICT 1 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held January 24, 1996, and the adjourned meetings held January 27 and February 14, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -8- 2/28/96 DISTRICT 2 Aooroval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held January 24, 1996, and the adjourned meetings held January 27 and February 14, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 3 Aproval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held January 24, 1996, and the adjourned meetings held January 27 and February 14, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 Aooroval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held January 24, 1996, and the adjourned meetings held January 27 and February 14, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 6 Aooroval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held January 24, 1996, and the adjourned meetings held January 27 and February 14, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 7 Aooroval of Minutes - - There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held January 24, 1996, and the adjourned meetings held January 27 and February 14, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -9- 2/28/96 DISTRICT 11 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held January 24, 1996, and the adjourned meeting held February 14, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 13 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held January 24, 1996, the adjourned meetings held January 27 and February 14, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 14 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held January 24, 1996, the adjourned meetings held January 27 and February 14, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. ALL DISTRICTS Ratification of payment of Joint and Individual District Claims Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That payment of Joint and Individual District claims set forth on exhibits"A" , 'B", and "C", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. -10- 2128/96 ALL DISTRICTS 01/24/96 01/30/96 20 /07/96 Joint Operating Fund - $ 330,891.89 $ 1,984.69 $1.097,537.60 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 716,314.33 100.00 377,866.63 Joint Working Capital Fund - 508,946.57 183,218.02 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 3,511.49 8,582.81 63,272.44 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 92.60 443.50 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 1.305.61 5.033.49 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 500,455.26 423,815.28 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 477.07 12,802.61 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 69.20 252.84 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 312,689.59 62,188.89 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 10,463.03 195,154.05 DISTRICT NO. 13 - 3.40 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 14 - 764.81 17.05 DISTRICTS NOS. 3 & 11 JOINT - 875.00 0.00 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 678.04 172,537.30 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 213.30 2,258.68 DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 15.98 6,341.96 $2.387.767.17 1 5 $2.602.740.34 ALL DISTRICTS Aooroving Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Aareement for Surveving Services for Various Collection System and Treatment Plant Proiects. Specification No. P-150, with Clifford A. Forkert Civil Engineers Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 96-18, approving Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Clifford A. Forkert Civil Engineers for Surveying Services for Various Collection System and Treatment Plant Projects, Specification No. P-150, providing for a name change to Forkert Engineering & Surveying, Inc. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -11- 2128/96 ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file draft minutes of the Steering Committee Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the draft minutes of the Steering Committee meeting held on January 24, 1996, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file draft minutes of the Planning Design. and Construction Committee Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the draft minutes of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee meeting held on February 1, 1996, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file draft minutes of the Operations. Maintenance. and Technical Services Committee Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the draft minutes of the Operations, Maintenance, and Technical Services Committee meeting held on February 7, 1996, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file draft minutes of the Finance. Administration. and Human Resources Committee Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the draft minutes of the Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee meeting held on February 14, 1996, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. -12- 2/28/96 ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file draft minutes of the Executive Committee Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the draft minutes of the Executive Committee meeting held on February 21, 1996, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Verbal reoort from Chair of Planning. Design. and Construction Committee re February 1. 1996 meetin Verbal report Director John Collins, Chair of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee, gave a brief verbal report and recommending approval on the two items of consideration. ALL DISTRICTS (PDC95-34) Actions re Maintenance Buildina at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-35-3: Process Area Fire Protection. Sionape and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-38-5, Process Area Fire Protection. Sianaae and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-46: and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications At Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-55 Approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for said project, changing the date for receipt of bids from January 9, 1996 to January 16, 1996, clarifying contractor's license requirements, and making miscellaneous technical clarifications, be, and is hereby, approved. -13- 2/28/96 Approving Addendum No. 2 to the Plans and specifications Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications for said project, making miscellaneous technical clarifications, be, and is hereby, approved. Awarding contract to Sverdrup Civil, Inc. Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 96-19, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-35-3; Process Area Fire Protection, Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-5; Process Area Fire Protection, Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-46; and, Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-55, to Sverdrup Civil, Inc., in the total corrected amount of$13,196,500.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Verbal report from Chair of Operations. Maintenance. and Technical Services Committee re February 7. 1996 meeting Verbal report Director Pat McGuigan, Chair of the Operations, Maintenance, and Technical Services Committee gave a brief report on the items being recommended for approval. -14- 2128/96 ALL DISTRICTS (OMTS95-041A & B) Actions re Heavy Duty Vehicle Demonstration Project with South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Authorizing the General Manaaerto enter into an aareement with SCAQMD Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to enter into an agreement with SCAQMD re said project, at no cost to the Districts, in form approved by General Counsel. Authorizina the General Manager to enter into a Memorandum of Understandina with SCAQMD Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding with SCAQMD re said project, in form approved by General Counsel. ALL DISTRICTS Verbal report from Chair of Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee re February 14, 1996 meeting Verbal report Director George Brown, Chair of the Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee requested that Vice Joint Chair Peer A. Swan give a brief report on the items being recommended for approval in his absence. -15- 2/28/96 ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR96-04) Refer item re Extending Benefit Coveraoe for regular employees who work a reduced work week to the Finance. Administration. and Human Resources Committee for further analysis Verbal report Mike Peterman, Acting Director of Human Resources, briefly summarized staffs recommendation in approving the extension of benefit coverage for those employees working a reduced work week. Following discussion among the Directors, it was then moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby refer the item back to the Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee, and to return said item to the Boards to include more detailed financial analysis and information on overtime expenses and how the use of part-time employees would mitigate this. General Counsel was requested to look at the issue of management discretion, extending this benefit on a case-by-case basis and determine if there are any legal impediments to this. Director William G. Steiner requested that his opposition to the motion be made a matter of record. ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR96-10) Approving Renewal of Boiler& Machinery Insurance with American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance (Kemper Insurance Group) Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the renewal of Boiler& Machinery Insurance for a one-year period effective March 1, 1996 to March 1, 1997, with American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance (Kemper Insurance Group), in an amount not to exceed $79,698.00, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR96-14) Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of December 1995 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Treasurer's Report for the month of December 1995, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. -16- 2/28/96 ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR96-15) Receive and file Mid-Year Financial and Operations Report dated December 31, 1995 After a brief presentation by Mike White, Controller, on the Mid YearFinancial and Operations Report, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Mid-Year Financial and Operations Report dated December 31, 1995, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR96-171 Approve 1996-97 Budget Assumptions for use of Districts' 1996-97 Budget After a brief presentation by Mike White, Controller, on the budget assumptions used for preparing the 1996-97 budget, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the 1996-97 Budget Assumptions, for use in preparation of Districts' 1996-97 Budget, be, and are hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Verbal report from Chair of Executive Committee re February 21, 1996 meeting In the absence of Joint Chair Cox, Vice Joint Chair Peer Swan gave a verbal report on the Joint Agreement of the County of Orange, the Official Investment Pool Participants' Committee, and Each Option A Pool recommended for approval by the Executive Committee. He stated that this item passed in the Executive Committee meeting by a 712 vote of approval. ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR96-09) Receive and file staff report dated February 5. 1996, and approving the Joint Agreement of the County of Orange. the Official Investment Pool Participants' Committee, and each Option A Pool Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager of Operations, gave a brief report on the status of the Orange County Commingled Investment Pool Committee and the County of Orange bankruptcy. Directors then entered into a lengthy discussion. -17- 2/28/96 It was then moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the staff report dated February 5, 1996 re the Joint Agreement of the County of Orange, the Official Investment Pool Participants' Committee, and Each Option A Pool, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 96-21, approving said agreement. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. Directors Don R. Griffin, John M. Gullixson, Margie L. Rice, and Daniel T. Welch requested that their opposition to the motion be made a matter of record. ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file Staff Report dated February 22, 1996, re moratorium on the determination and collection of excess capacity charges Nancy Wheatley, Director of Technical Services, briefly summarized excess capacity charges. Staff has been looking at connection charges trying to develop a fair system for all Districts' customers, both residential and business. There have been different ways in how various kinds of business, industrial, and commercial customers have been treated in the past which is, in fact, what led staff to develop the excess capacity charges recommended to the Directors last spring. Existing businesses were not charged an additional capital connection fee regardless of how much they increased their flow, whereas if a new business came on line with more than 50,000 gallons, they would be charged the connection fee. It was concluded that the best thing to do at this point was to place a moratorium on these types of fees pending the completion of the strategic plan in the capital connection study. Staff is recommending that there be no excess capacity charges assessed until that study is completed. At that time, a new system should be in place and applied to all businesses. Any new business which comes on line between now and the time that the revised fee system is adopted would be told that there would be a charge in an amount established in the future, the payment of which will be deferred until that time. It will not be a retroactive charge, but they will have to pay the fee at that time. It is anticipated that the charge will be an annual charge and will be assessed based upon flow. It is recommended that new businesses moving to Orange County need to know what the magnitude of that charge would be. Staff has proposed that the Districts guarantee those businesses that on an annual basis their total charge would be no higher than the one-time charge which would be assessed under the present system based on the excess capacity charge calculation. Staff also recommends using the -18- 2/28/96 excess capacity charge calculation because staff believes that it fairly reflects the Districts' costs of providing capital facilities for businesses to handle flow and solids. The Vice Joint Chair then recognized Mark Asturias, Economic Development Manager, representing the Mayor and Council from the City of Garden Grove. He stated that the City is supportive of everything the Districts are doing in regards to the excess capacity charge, and applauds and supports Districts' current efforts and recommendation being considered at this meeting. However, the City was requesting further relief on the method of calculation of the excess capacity charge. He stated that the City believes that with the previous policy, capacity charge calculation was substantially lower than what is currently being proposed. Using House Foods as an example, he stated that this business would have been charged under the old method somewhere in the area of$660,000. Under the currently proposed method, House Foods would be charged in excess of$1,400,000. He asked the Boards to consider placing a cap on the adoption of staffs recommendation. The City is trying to assist House Foods who is trying to move into their community. In response to Directors' questions, he stated that House Foods was not moving into a redevelopment project area and cannot assist them with reduction of any city fees. They are working with them, however, to expedite permitting and providing offsets to some city fees. Vice Joint Chair Swan then recognized Richard Hertel, consultant for House Foods, which is a Japanese tofu manufacturer. He stated House Foods was moving from Los Angeles to Garden Grove where they purchased land about three years prior. House Foods wanted to go on record to ask the Board of Directors in their case specifically to waive any excess capacity fees for their particular use. He then stated the reasons as follows: (1) House Foods has been a corporate citizen in Garden Grove for three years, (2) prior to buying the property they hired John Brown, a renowned consulting firm, that did a lot of the due diligence for House Foods, part of which was meeting with the different governmental authorities, including the Sanitation Districts. They were advised by their consultant that there were certain fees involving connections, none of which were excess capacity fees. He stated that he had notes that state how the Districts determined the fee of approximately $67,000.00, based on a square footage and building size. He further stated the current ordinance does not stipulate an absolute excess capacity fee or any formula to calculate such a fee, but it does provide that on a case by case basis, some fee may be charged. The District is discussing a fee for House Foods based on their projected actual usage. House Foods will discharge about 95,000 gallons per day of effluent. Based on that, an equivalent dwelling unit method of calculation has been determined by staff requiring House Foods to pay a fee of about $660,000. Mr. Hertel further stated the Sanitation Districts started the case by case program in about 1983, and since that time it hasn't consistently implemented any kind of an excess capacity fee. In fad, out of the 80 or 85 companies in Orange County that have flow in excess of 50,000 gallons, he was not aware of any private companies that had to pay an excess _19_ 2/26196 capacity fee. House Foods perspective is that they would certainly agree to the same formula that Kimberly Clark, for example, who uses 2,000,000 gallons a day, would pay. House Foods' position is the Districts should allow companies to obtain sewer permits during this study period without payment of any excess capacity charge. Until such time as a new ordinance is adopted, the Districts should process all sewer applications as they have in the past, fairly and without excessive user fees. He further stated that House Foods understands the need for the Districts to upgrade their system and have the people and the heavy users in Orange County pay their fair share, House Foods has no problem paying the standard fees that all other companies in Orange County have paid over the years. Therefore House Foods would request that the Board waive excess capacity charge. Following discussion among the Directors and questions to staff, It was moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Staff Report dated February 22, 1996, requesting staff be authorized to place a moratorium on the determination of amount and collection of excess capacity charges until such time that a study of capital charges is completed and a method to asses and collect capital charges is adopted by the Boards of Directors, and to guarantee the capital charge for industrial users, which connect to the system or increase their discharge prior to completion of the study, will be no higher than those specified in said Staff Report, be, and is hereby, received, and ordered filed and adopted. Said moratorium will not apply to dischargers which enter into separate discharge agreements with the Districts. ALL DISTRICTS General Counsel's comments Prior to Closed Session General Counsel reported to the Directors the need for a closed session as authorized by Government Code Section 54956.9(a) to discuss and consider the items that are specified as Item 15(b)(1) and (2) on the published Agenda. ALL DISTRICTS Convene in Closed Session pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) The Boards convened in closed session at 10:14 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a). Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Boards of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. No actions were taken re Agenda Items 15(b)(1) and (2). -20- 2/28196 ALL DISTRICTS Reconvene in regular session At 10:35 p.m., the Boards reconvened in regular session. DISTRICT 1 Adiournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:35 p.m. DISTRICT 2 Aooroving Agreement with the Orange County Flood Control District re installation of flood Protection on South River Trunk as Part of the Santa Ana River Flood Improvements Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 96-22-2, approving Agreement with the Orange County Flood Control District, providing for reimbursement of costs to the Flood Control District re installation of flood protection on South River Trunk as part of the Santa Ana River Flood Improvements, in an amount not to exceed $50,000.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Journment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:35 p.m. DISTRICT 3 Journment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:35 p.m. -21- 2/28/96 DISTRICT 5 Receive and file Summons and Comolaint for Inverse Condemnation. Charles G. Reynold. at al.. vs. City of Newport Beach, at al.. Superior Court Case No. 758245 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Summons & Complaint for Inverse Condemnation, Charles G. Reynolds, at al., vs. City of Newport Beach, at al., Superior Court Case No. 758245, for alleged damages to homes due to surface runoff because of a ruptured sewer line adjacent to plaintiffs' homes, be, and is hereby, received and ordered file, and, FURTHER MOVED: That the District's General Counsel be, and is hereby, authorized to appear and defend the interests of the District. DISTRICT 5 Joumment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:35 p.m. DISTRICT 6 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:35 p.m. DISTRICT 7 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:35 p.m. -22- 2/28/96 DISTRICT 11 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:35 p.m. DISTRICT 13 Journment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:35 p.m. DISTRICT 14 Adiournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:35 p.m. Secretary he Bards of Directors Of County VnitatillnDistricts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, e7, 11, 13 & 14 -23- FUND NO 9169 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0122196 PAGE 1 - REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0124196 POSTING DATE 0124196 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 149482 A-1 FENCE CO INC. $797.00 GATE REPAIR 149483 AG TECH COMPANY $50.243.52 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 149484 ASL CONSULTING ENGINEERS $1,028.74 ATWOOD SUBTRUNK PLAN PREPARATION 149485 ASRANALYSIS $1,500.00 LAB SERVICES 149486 ATM AA,INC. $1,160.00 LAB SERVICES 149487 ATB T-MEGACOM SERVICE $5,453.90 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 149488 AT&T-MEGACOM SERVICE $2,003.40 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 149489 AT&T-CELLULAR CR&R $6.10 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 149490 ACORN CONSULTING $2,730.00 CONSULTING SERVICES 149491 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS,INC. $2.553.00 CONSTRUCTION P1-36-1 149492 AIR UQUIDE AMERICA CORP. $1.247.69 SPECIALTY GASSES 149493 AIR PRODUCTS F,CHEMICALS $18.322.00 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.O.8-9.89 149494 ALADDIN HOUSE $350.45 WINDOWBUNDS 149495 AMERIDATA $1.280.82 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 149496 AMERICAN AIR FILTER,INC. $1,82836 MECHANICAL PARTS 149497 AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION $85.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 149496 AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE $317.81 CHEMICALS 149499 APA EDUCATION TRUST $2,055.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING X 149500 APCO VALVE&PRIMER CORP. $1.912.56 PLUMBING SUPPLIES y 149501 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $3.420.60 NOTICES&ADS M 149502 APPLE ONE $5,962.00 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES m 149503 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $8,714.05 COMPUTER SOFTWARE M y 149500 AQUATIC BIOASSAY BCONSULTANTS 95,475.00 LABORATORY SERVICES 149505 ARROWHEAD ELECTRIC CORP. $416.21 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 149506 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE,INC. $931.20 TOXIC WASTE REMOVAL 149507 AMSA $425.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 149505 AURORA PUMP $37.00 PUMP PARTS 149509 RANDOLPH AUSTIN CO. $576.10 LAB SUPPLIES 149510 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $3.884.66 PAYROLL SERVICES 149511 BFI MEDICAL WASTE SYSTEMS $46.05 WASTE DISPOSAL 140512 E S BABCOCK&SONS INC $1,140.00 LAB ANALYSIS 140513 BAKER INSTRUMENT CO $25.019.95 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 149514 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $608.57 BATTERIES 149515 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $2,892.37 LAB SUPPLIES 119516 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $154.30 TRUCK WASH TICKETS 149517 SIOSOUDS RECYCLERS OF SO CAL i1,000.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES 149518 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $18.143.47 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-1-2 149519 BRENNER-FIEDLER&ASSOC..INC. $101.84 GENERATORS 149520 BUSH&ASSOCIATES,INC. $4,652.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O."-94 149521 CCI TECHNOLOGIES $527.00 SPLICE CABLES 149522 C.C.S.C.E. $210.11 PUBLICATION 149523 CEM CORPORATION $7.300.40 LAB SUPPLIES 149524 CH2M HILL $10,606.20 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-31 149525 CALFON CONSTRUCTION $306,091.56 CONSTRUCTION 7-22&7-24 149526 CALTROL,INC. $1,231.05 HARDWARE 149527 CALIF ASSOC.OF SAN.AGENCIES $120.00 WORK CONFERENCE REGISTRATION FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 01122198 PAGE2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID O124196 POSTING DATE 0124/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 149528 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $85.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 149529 CALTEX PLASTICS,INC. $1,084.72 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 149530 CAMALI CORP. $3.625.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 149531 CAPITALWESTWARD $223.71 MECHANICAL PARTS 149532 JOHN CARDLLO ENGINEERS $17,762.25 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-15.2 149633 JOHN CARDILLO ENGINEERS $1,337A4 ENGINEERING SERVICES MO B-23.95 149534 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $699.18 OFFICE FURNITURE 149535 MICHAEL A CHAMP $6,50000 OCEAN MONITORING 149536 CHROME CRANKSHAFT,INC. $720.00 PUMP PARTS 149537 CLEMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL $12.572.67 CONSULTANT-LANDFILL PROJECT MO 7-31-95 149538 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $11,191.23 ELECTRIC PARTS 149539 CONSUMER PIPE $1.267.02 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 149540 CONTINENTAL EQUIP E SUPPLY $16.52 TOOLS 149541 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $715.46 ENGINE PARTS 149542 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $346.10 TRUCK PARTS 149543 COVEY LEADERSHIP CENTER $558.00 SUBSCRIPTION 149544 CHARLES P.CROWLEY.CO. $369.24 INSTRUMENT PARTS [4 149545 CITY OF CYPRESS $25.00 BUDGET COPY 54 149546 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION $311.50 UNDERGROUND FUELJOIL STORAGE TAX S 149547 SWRCB/AFRS $400.00 WASTE DISCHARGE FEE r tD 149548 DATA SYSTEMS SERVICE $278.58 SOFTWARE �--� 149549 ALBERT W DAVIES INC $474,027.36 CONSTRUCTION 3-36R H 149550 DEL MAR ANALYTICAL $2,208.00 LAB SUPPLIES T 149551 THE DIAMOND GROUP $4.000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ro 149552 LABCLEAR $100.52 LAB SUPPLIES 149553 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $392.51 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 149554 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $942.52 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 149555 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $265.50 PAINT SUPPLIES 149556 EDWARDS DIV.OF GS BLDG SYS. $2,641.50 SERVICE AGREEMENT 149557 LINDA EISMAN $636.66 TRAINING SUPPLIES 149558 - EMERGENCY MGMT NETWORK $1.380.00 CPMRST AID TRAINING 149559 ENCHANTER,INC. $2,800.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5.24-95 149560 FLUID TECH.SALES $614.71 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 149561 FST SAND AND GRAVEL,INC. $1,282.26 ROAD BASE MATERIALS 149562 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $16.318.36 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O. 10-9-91 149563 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $138.50 AIR FREIGHT 149564 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $416.64 FILTERS 149565 FIRST CHOICE $1,164.32 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT 149566 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $429.60 LAB SUPPLIES 149567 FISONS INSTRUMENTS $2.161.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 149568 FLICKINGER CO $233.99 VALVE 149569 FLO-SYSTEMS $10.575.08 PUMP PARTS 149570 FLUID METERING INC $2.051.17 LAB SUPPLIES 149571 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT 3895.80 PAINT SUPPLIES 149572 GMF SOUND INC $975.62 COMMUNICATIONS SUPPLIES 149573 GST,INC. $1,987.64 OFFICE SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0122196 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0124196 POSTING DATE 01/24/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 149574 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $2.994.37 ELECTRIC PARTS 149575 GENERAL PETROLEUM $16,953.22 DIESEL I UNLEADED FUEL 149576 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $6,586.97 TELEPHONE SERVICES 149577 TOM GERLINGER $1.723.44 REIMB.TRAINING B TRAVEL 149578 GOVT CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENT $175.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 149579 GOVERNMENT INSTITUTES INC $1.655.00 PUBLICATIONS 149580 GRASSY S.T.I. S6D4.50 ENGINE PARTS 149581 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 6402A3 FIBER OPTIC SUPPLIES 149582 OGA CONSULTANTS $6.933.93 SURVEYING SERVICES MO 8-23-95&NO 6-8-94 149583 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $958.49 TRUCK PARTS 149584 HARBOUR ENGINEERING $15,571.00 MECHANICAL PARTS 149585 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS $730.00 CONTAINER RENTALS 149586 HAWKINS ASSOCIATES $450.00 LAB EQUIPMENT 149557 HOLMES S NARVER,INC. $9.125.30 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1d4&P2-53 MO 3.8-95 149583 HOME DEPOT $132.26 SMALL HARDWARE 149589 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $988.89 PAINT SUPPLIES 149590 WIS PRESS $65.00 PUBLICATION 149591 1 C M A DISTRIBUTION CTR $232.40 PUBLICATIONS x 149592 IPCO SAFETY $3,097.45 SAFETY SUPPLIES 149593 ITT BARTON SALES $960.29 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES m 149594 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $425.31 BATTERIES I"I 149595 CITY OF IRVINE $29,000.00 ADJUST 8 REHABILITATE 43 MANHOLES 3 149596 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $70.44 WATER USE Y 149597 J2 PRINTING SERVICES $525.02 PRIMING w 149598 JAMISON ENGINEERING $25,098.32 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 149599 JAYS CATERING $47.60 DIRECTORS MEETING EXPENSE 149600 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO. $64.60 GAUGE 149601 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $1.166.08 ELECTRIC PARTS 149602 JONES CHEMICALS,INC. $13,918.72 SODIUM HYPOCHLORTTE NO 26-95 149603 JONES INDUSTRIAL HARDWARE CO. $1,091.87 TOOLS 149604 KAL ARCHITECTS $1,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE 142605 FRANCES L KALUZNY $1.680.00 HUMAN RESOURCES CONSULTANT 149605 KEYS PRODUCTIVITY CENTER $248.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 149607 KING BEARING,INC. $1.045.95 MACHINE SUPPLIES 149608 KIPLINGER $132.00 PUBLICATION 149609 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $6.538.02 TOOLS 149510 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $330.79 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICE 149611 LAIDLAW ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES $32.220.24 WASTE DISPOSAL 149612 LAMSON CORPORATION $213.89 COMPUTER PARTS 149513 LAWICRANDAL,INC. $1.778.75 SOIL TESTING 7-13-94 149614 LEAGUE OF CLAIF.CITIES $165.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 149615 LEE&RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC. $23.798.69 ENGINEERING SERVICES 149616 SOCO-LYNCH CORP. $493.93 JANITORIAL SERVICES 149617 MPS $59.34 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 149518 MACOMCO $464.10 SERVICE AGREEMENT 149819 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS,INC. $6.184.68 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 01/2V96 PAGE4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMSPAID07/24/98 POSTING DATE 01/24/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 149620 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $612,150.00 CONSTRUCTION PI-36-2 149621 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $58,703.97 CONSTRUCTION P2-42-2 149622 MARTIN INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE $3,475.20 SECURITY CONSULTING 149623 MARVAC DOPY ELECTRONICS $438.88 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 149624 THE MCGRAW-HILL COMPANIES $134.47 PUBLICATION 149625 DORALDF. MCINTYRE $103.91 REIMBURSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE 149626 MEASUREMENT VARIABLES,INC. $1,236.98 FILTER SUPPLIES 149627 MIDWAY MFG.&MACHINING $9.298.58 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 149628 MILLTRONICS $1.787.53 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 149629 MONITOR LADS $249.98 INSTRUMENT 149630 MUSTANG UNITS CO.,INC. $3.509.00 ENGINE 149631 NASCO $271.33 LAB SUPPLIES 149632 NAT WEST MARKETS $11000.00 COP INTEREST DRAW FEES 149633 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES $875.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 149634 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $2.215.02 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 149635 NEWARK ELECTRONICS $153.05 INSTRUMENT PARTS 149636 NICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY $20.901.82 LUBRICANTSIDIESEL FUEL m 149637 OLSTEN STAFFING SERVICES $2.016.00 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES k 149638 THE ORANGE COUNTY FORUM $375.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING x 149639 ORANGE VALVE B FITTING CO. $1.375.39 FITTINGS 149640 OXYGEN SERVICE $1.628.01 SPECIALTY GASES � 149641 COUNTY OF ORANGE $2,830.50 PERMITS H 149642 PACIFIC PARTS $2.381.62 INSTRUMENT PARTS 7 149843 PACIFIC BELL $1,702.85 TELEPHONE SERVICES a 140" PADGETT - THOMPSON $885.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 149645 PAGENET $1,015.90 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 149646 PALLETS B ACCESSORIES CO. $1,531.13 PALLETS 149647 PARKHOUSE TIRE,INC. $1,108.88 TIRES 149648 PARTS UNLIMITED $338.96 TRUCK PARTS 149649 PEGASUS MAIL-C/O DAVID HARRIS $350.00 SOFTWARE 149650 PENN STATE UNIVERSITY 54,790.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 149651 MIKE PETERSON $105.49 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 149652 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $4,551.57 REIMB.PETTY CASH,TRAINING&TRAVEL 149653 POLYMETRICS,INC. $1,262.75 LAB SUPPLIES 149654 POLYPURE,INC. $23,199.40 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92 149655 POSTAGE BY PHONE $5,000.00 POSTAGE 149656 PUMPING SOLUTIONS INC $813.65 PUMP PARTS 149657 PUTZMEISTER,INC. $92.52 PUMP PARTS 149658 OMS INC $183.23 REPAIR 149659 QUICKSTART TECHNOLOGIES $3,750.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 149660 RB R INSTRUMENTS $561.59 ELECTRIC PARTS 149661 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO. $902.88 LAB SUPPLIES 149862 THE REGISTER $1,168.80 NOTICES B ADS 149663 REMEDYTEMP $3,190.71 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 149664 RENOLD INC. $85.10 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 149665 DON RICHARDSON WATER TRUCK $8.249.60 WATER TANK FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 01/22/96 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0124MO POSTING DATE 0124/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 149666 RM MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL $2,378.95 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 149667 RODNEY-HUNT CO $245.40 HEADWORKS REPAIR 149668 SKC WEST $1,284.94 SAFETY SUPPLIES 149669 SANTA FE BAG CO. $218.94 FREIGHT 149870 SANTA PE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $78.12 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 149671 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTL $46,716.64 OCEAN MONITORING MO 6.28-95 149672 R.CRAIG SCOTT&ASSOC. $2,756.87 LEGAL SERVICES-PERSONNEL ISSUES 149673 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $1,482.16 SPECIALTY GASES 149674 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $2.033.50 TOOLS 149675 SHURELUCK SALES $4,215.09 TOOLSHARDINARE 149676 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $1,588.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 149677 SMITH-EMERY CO. $616.00 SOIL TESTING M.0.7-11-94 149678 SMITH PIPE&SUPPLY $343.37 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 149579 ROYA SOHANAKI $754.62 DAMAGE CLAIM SETTLEMENT 149680 SO COAST AIR QUALITY 11.64248 PERMIT FEES 149681 SOUTHERN CALIF ASSOC OF $75.00 PUBLICATION 149682 SO CALIF EDISON CO $1,284.55 POWER [a 149683 SO CALIF EDISON CO $25,896.30 POWER X 149684 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $27,157.73 NATURAL GAS 5 149685 SO.CALIF.WATER CO. $%03 WATER USE 149686 SPEX CHEMICAL&SAMPLE PREP $314.98 LAB SUPPLIES m 149687 SUMMIT STEEL $2,530.17 METAL "6 149688 SUPELCO,INC. $1.320.53 LAB SUPPLIES q 149689 SUPER CHEM CORP. $608.85 CHEMICALS 149690 SURVEYORS SERVICE CO $134.79 TOOLS tr 149691 SYNECTIC MEDICAL,INC. $1,561.00 LAB SUPPLIES 149692 T&C INDUSTRIAL CONTROLS $1.613.00 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 149693 TEKTRONIX,INC. $385.96 INSTRUMENT PARTS 149694 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $359.21 MECHANICAL PARTS 149695 THORPE INSULATION $47.53 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 149696 TONY'S LOCK&SAFE SERVICE $80.81 LOCKS&KEYS 149697 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $202.05 TRUCK PARTS 149698 TRUESDAIL LABS $3.540.00 LAB SERVICES 149699 JG TUCKER&SON,INC. $15,111.20 INSTRUMENT PARTS 149700 VWR SCIENTIFIC $3.281.08 LAB SUPPLIES 149701 VALIN CORPORATION $498.46 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 149702 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $1,392.40 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 149703 VERTEX TECHNOLOGIES.INC. $5,192.68 FIBER OPTICS 149704 WARREN GORHAM&LAMONT INC $349.21 PUBLICATION&SUBSCRIPTION 149705 WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION $1,155.98 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT COURSES 149706 WAXIE $1.955.02 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 149707 WAYNE ELECTRIC $283.83 TRUCK PARTS 1497DS WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $23,679.12 CAUSTIC SODA MO 9.23-95 149709 WEST4XTE SUPPLY CO. $367.28 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 149710 ROURKE,WOODRUFF&SPRADUN 178.983.59 LEGAL SERVICES MO 7-26.95 149711 XEROX CORP. $16,404.62 COPIER LEASES FUND NO 9199 IT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 012V96 PAGE6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 01/24198 POSTING DATE 01124196 WARRANT NO. VENDOR 149712 JOHNSON YOKOGAWA CORP. 5714.63 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 1=7195 $2.387,767.17 SUMMARY AMOUNT #1 CONSTR FUND 392SO 42 OPER FUND $14.36 02 CAP FAC FUND 61,02814 02 CONSTR FUND $262.51 #3 OPER FUND $25,344.19 #3 CAP FAC FUND $474,827.36 03 CONSTR FUND $283.71 05 OPER FUND $392.27 1.1 05 CONSTR FUND 884.80 S 96 CONSTR FUND $69.20 I„1 #7OPERFUND 575.42 01 07 CAP FAC FUND 312.016.06 #7 CONSTR FUND 98.11 H #11 OPER FUND 8,740.18 0+ #11 CAP FAC FUND 1.637.14 m 011 CONSTR FUND 85.71 #13 CONSTR FUND $3.40 914 OPER FUND $30.85 014 CAP FAC FUND $714.00 014 CONSTR FUND $19.96 #3&11 OPER FUND $875.00 #5&6 OPER FUND $34.04 #5&6 CAP FAC FUND $644.00 #6&7 OPER FUND $213.30 #7&14 OPER FUND $15.98 JT OPER FUND $330.891.89 CORF $716.314.33 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $3,511.49 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $508,946.57 $2,387,767.11 FUND NO 9199 • JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE OII301H PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 01130M POSTING DATE 01I30M WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 149714 ACWA $300.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING 149115 CALIF.DEBT ADVISORY $100.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING 149716 JAYS CATERING $1.654.69 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE 149717 R.CRAIG SCOTT 8 ASSOC, 88,552.81 LEGAL SERVICES-PERSONNEL ISSUES 570,867.50 SUMMARY AMOUNT JT OPER FUND $1,984.69 CORF $100.00 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $8,582A1 $10.667.50 Pl X S H b) H H w FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 02/06196 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 02107M POSTING DATE 0W71M WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 149731 AT&T- UNIPLAN SERVICE $2.494.55 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 149732 AT&T-MEGACOM SERVICE $1,404.38 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 149733 AT&T $56.53 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 149734 AT&T-CELLULAR CR&R $8.65 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 149735 A-Z LOGIC SYSTEMS $192.62 LAB SUPPLIES 149738 RP ADAMS COMPANY $1,750.43 MECHANICAL PARTS 149737 AIR LIOUIDE AMERICA CORP. $1.947.32 SPECIALTY GASSES 149738 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $10,565.43 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.O.8.969 149739 AIRBORNE EXPRESS $347.57 AIR FREIGHT 149740 AMERIDATA $1,128.61 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 149741 AMERICAN AIRLINES $824.35 TRAVEL SERVICES 149742 AMOCO ENERGY TRADING $61,394.58 NATURAL GAS NO 6-28.95 149743 ANIXTER-DISTRIBUTION 83,570.09 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 149744 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $2.332.22 NOTICES&ADS 149745 APPLE ONE $2,206.80 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 149746 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $124.63 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 149747 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT $1,346A2 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 149748 ATKIWJONES COMPUTER SERVICE $64260 SERVICE AGREEMENT x 149749 AUTODESK INC. $5.096.52 SOFTWARE 149750 B.M.I. $325.00 ELECTRIC PARTS 149751 ES BABCOCK&SONS INC $898.50 UIBANALYSIS w 149752 BANANA BLUEPRINT $22,449.24 PRINTINGM.O.11-07-94 H 149753 BANK OF AMERICA $220.64 BANKING CHARGES 149754 BATTERY SPECIALTIES 8984.95 BATTERIES j7 149755 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. 81,2D4.72 LAB SUPPLIES 149756 BERENDSEN FLUID POWER $112.27 VALVE 149757 BLANCHARD TRAINING&DEV $1,063.30 TRAINING PUBLICATIONS 149758 TOM BLANDA $136.79 TRAINING EXPENSE REIMB . 149759 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $2.842.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-18 149760 BRENNER-FIEDLER&ASSOC..INC. $6.597.67 GENERATORS 149761 BROOKS INSTRUMENT DIV. $341.25 INSTRUMENT 149762 BUDGET JANITORIAL $3.330.00 JANITORIAL SERVICES MO 1-12-94 149763 BNI BOOKS $89.92 BOOKS 149764 CCI TECHNOLOGIES 842D.00 SPLICE CABLES 149765 CEPA $899.50 LAB ANALYIS 149766 CH2M HILL $164,542.45 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-31 149767 CS COMPANY $5,762.96 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 149768 CALFON CONSTRUCTION $97,833.03 CONSTRUCTION 7-22&7-24 149769 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH INC. - $959.75 LAB SUPPLIES 149770 CALTROL,INC. $6,303.69 HARDWARE 149771 CAMALI CORP. $1.124.88 SERVICE AGREEMENT 149772 CANUS CORPORATION $8.285.62 FIBER OPTIC CABLE 149773 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $32.317.74 ENGINEERING SERVICES MO 5.24-95 149774 RICHARD CASTILLON $135.96 TRAINING EXPENSE REIMB 149775 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $1.758.15 OFFICE FURNITURE 149776 CHEMWEST INC $1,335.02 PUMP PARTS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0V06M PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 02/07M POSTING DATE 02N7196 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 149777 CHROME CRANKSHAFT,INC. $240.00 PUMP PARTS 149778 CLEMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL $20.086.10 CONSULTANT-LANDFILL PROJECT MO 7-31-95 149779 COASTAL VIDEO COMMUNICATION $13,501.43 TRAINING VIDEOS 149780 COUCH&SONS $30,643.20 CONSTRUCTION M-044 149701 COUCH&SONS $190.334.00 CONSTRUCTION 11-17-1 149762 COMMUNICATIONS PERFORMANCE GROUP $17,850.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 149783 COMPUSA,INC. $64.97 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 149784 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $7.659.20 ELECTRIC PARTS 149785 CONSUMER PIPE $2,071.20 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 149786 CONTINENTAL EQUIPMENT&SUPPLY E2,213.04 TOOLS 149787 CONTINENTAL LAB PRODUCTS,INC. $60.54 LAB SUPPLIES 149788 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $17,897.03 ENGINE PARTS 149789 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $2,464.74 ELECTRIC PARTS 149790 CHARLES P.CROWLEY.CO. $648.25 INSTRUMENT PARTS 149791 ALBERT W.DAVIES,INC. $320,454.65 CONSTRUCTION 3-36R 149792 DOUGLAS J DAVIS&ASSOC.,INC. $3.949.90 INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE SERVICES 149793 DELL COMPUTER CORP. E752.10 COMPUTER PARTS 149794 DEL MAR ANALYTICAL E190.00 BIOSOLJDS ANALYSIS M 149795 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIF. EBO,BB9.11 DENTAL INSURANCE PLAN M.O.1-12-94 X 149796 DELTA FOAM PRODUCTS $145.00 _ LAB SUPPLIES 149797 THE DIAMOND GROUP $4.000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES In 149798 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $31,912.81 OFFICE EQUIPMENT H 149799 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $90.51 PAINT SUPPLIES � 149800 DYALS SALES E578.19 FITTINGS 149801 DYCORP $241.79 TRUCK PARTS N 149802 ESP NORTH $685.46 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 149803 EDWARDS HIGH VACUUM INTER. $290.57 LAB SUPPLIES 149804 FMC CORPORATION $75,299.11 HYDROGEN PEROXIDE MO 9.14.94 149805 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $111.65 AIR FREIGHT 149B06 FILTERLINE CORP. $37.00 FILTERS 149807 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $4.839.53 FILTERS 149508 FIRST CHOICE $391.64 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT 149809 FISCHER&PORTER CO. $2,774.76 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 149810 FISHER ROSEMOUNT $1,736.98 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 149811 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $13,691.44 WATER USE 149812 FRYS ELECTRONICS $723.39 ELECTRONIC&COMPUTER SUPPLIES 149813 GST,INC. $11,443.85 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 149814 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $2,543.98 CHEMICALS 149815 GATES FIBERGLASS INSTALLERS $3,204.62 FIBERGLASS WHEEL 149816 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $4.066.49 ELECTRIC PARTS 149817 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1,078.10 TELEPHONE SERVICES 149818 GERHARDTS,INC. $4.200.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 149819 GIERLICH-MITCHELL,INC. $25,486.56 PUMP PARTS 149820 WN GRAINGER,INC. E122.64 COMPRESSOR PARTS 149521 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $2.095.90 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 149822 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC WHOLESALE $3,238.29 FIBER OPTIC SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 02 NMB PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 021O7196 POSTING DATE 02/07/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 149823 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $600,52 PRINTING 149824 DGA CONSULTANTS 73,020.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6—&94 149825 HR DIRECT $13.99 OFFICE SUPPLIES 149826 HIS TYPE B GRAPHICS $346.90 PRINTING 149827 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $3,199.88 TRUCK PARTS 149828 HACH COMPANY $3,810.36 LAB SUPPLIES 149829 GEORGE T.HALL CO. $456.18 ELECTRIC PARTS 149830 HATCH 8 KIRK,INC. $3,024.91 TRUCK PARTS 149831 PL HAWN CO,INC. $321.23 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 149832 HELLO DIRECT $198.76 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 149833 HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT $2.083.33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN. 149834 HERTZ EQUIPMENT RENTAL $502.95 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 149635 HOERBIGER CVS CALIF.,INC. $2,972.57 COMPRESSOR PARTS 149836 HOME DEPOT $756.92 SMALL HARDWARE 149837 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $653.38 PAINT SUPPLIES 149836 1 C M A DISTRIBUTION CENTER $141.65 PUBLICATION 149839 IPCO SAFETY $4,121.94 SAFETY SUPPLIES 149840 ISI INFORTEXT $3,692.75 SOFTWARE x 149841 ITT BARTON SALES $192.12 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES x 149842 IMAGING PLUS $523.81 OFFICE SUPPLIES H 749843 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS E35.56 CONNECTORS H 149844 INORGANIC VENTURES $227.72 LAB SUPPLIES H 149845 INSIDE EPA $1,335.00 SUBSCRIPTIONS n 149846 INSTRUMENT LABORATORY $373.69 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 1 149847 IRVINE PHOTO GRAPHICS $21.29 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES av 149848 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $5.54 WATER USE 149849 IRVINE SCI-TECH BOOKS 5430.00 PUBLICATIONS 149850 J2 PRINTING SERVICES $2,533.79 PRINTING 149851 JAMISON ENGINEERING $12,010.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 149852 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $1,711.37 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 149853 DEE JASPAR B ASSOC. $5,086.32 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 149854 JAYS CATERING $1,418.39 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE 149855 JOHNSON CONTROLS,INC. $203.60 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 149856 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $149.20 ELECTRIC PARTS 149857 JOHNSTON PUMP CO $2,183.02 ELECTRIC PARTS 149858 JONES CHEMICALS,INC. $7,457.31 SODIUM HYPOCKLORITE MO 446-95 149859 FRANCES L.KALUZNY $1.280.00 HUMAN RESOURCES CONSULTANT 149860 KELLY PAPER $937.40 PRINTING 149861 KEMIRON PACIFIC,INC. $149,592.10 FERRIC CHLORIDE MO 9-27-95 149862 KERRY CONSULTING GROUP $3,906.18 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MO I1-15.95 149863 KEYE PRODUCTIVITY CENTER $139.00 REGISTRATION 149864 KING BEARING,INC. $1.408.90 MACHINE SUPPLIES 149865 KLEINFELDER $432.00 GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTING SERVICES 149866 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $6,596.92 TOOLS 149867 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $613.57 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICE 149868 LAIDLAW ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES $5.444.04 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DISPOSAL FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 02/06196 PAGE4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 02/07/96 POSTING DATE 02107M WARRANTNO. VENDOR AMOUNT 149869 LAN-AIR SUPPLY CO.,INC. $114.53 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 149870 LASERALL CORP. $582.00 PRINTER REPAIR 149871 LAW/CRANDAL,INC. $660.00 SOIL TESTING 7-13-94 149872 LEE&RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC. $9,906,50 ENGINEERING SERVICES 149873 LIEBERT CORPORATION $2,291.38 ELECTRIC PARTS 149874 K.P.LINDSTROM,INC. $3,481,14 ENVIR.CONSULTING SERVICES MO 12.9-90 149875 LUSTRE-CAL $545.95 SAFETY 149876 MDT BIOLOGIC COMPANY $936.00 LAB SUPPLIES 149877 MPS $414.84 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 149878 MACOMCO $596.75 SERVICE AGREEMENT 149879 MAGNETEK $38,213.59 GENERATOR MAINTENANCE 149860 MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY CORP. $1,652.48 TOOLS 149881 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $22.20 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 149882 MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. $551.63 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 149BB3 MIDWAY MFG.&MACHINING $3,029.58 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 149884 MISSION INDUSTRIES $5,70089 UNIFORM RENTALS 149885 MONITOR LABS $874.44 INSTRUMENT C9 149886 MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE $5,000.00 RATING SERVICE MAINTENANCE FEES x 149887 MOORE PRODUCTS CO $179.39 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES w 149888 MORTON SALT $673.70 SALT 1"1 149989 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES $5,357.50 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 149890 G ROBERT NEASE PHOTOGRAPHY $1,677.67 PROFESSIONAL PHOTOGRAPHER '3 149891 NEW HORIZONS COMPUTER CENTERS,INC. $780.00 SOFTWARE TRAINING CLASSES n 149892 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $6.00 WATER USE 1 149893 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $5.929.94 OFFICE SUPPLIES a 149894 OLSTEN STAFFING SERVICES $1.708.00 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 149895 ORANGE COURIER $138AS COURIER SERVICES 149596 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. $107.91 FITTINGS 149897 OXYGEN SERVICE $3,486.73 SPECIALTY GASES 149898 ORANGE CO EMPLOYEES $4.799.25 EARLY RETIREMENT PROGRAM REIMB 149899 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT $27,750.20 GAP WATER USE M.0.6-9-93 149900 PACIFIC CLIPPINGS $188.80 CONTRACTSERVICE 149901 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $1,116.06 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 149902 PACIFIC PARTS $9,238.84 INSTRUMENT PARTS 149903 PACIFIC BELL $15.90 TELEPHONE SERVICES 149904 PARAGON CABLE $41.28 CABLE SERVICES 149905 PARKHOUSE TIRE,INC. $555.99 TIRES 149906 PEDERSEN COMMUNICATIONS $4,348.00 INSTALLATION OF CABLES 149907 PERSONAL STRENGHTS PUBLICATION $394.01 PUBLICATION 149908 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $620.07 REIMS.PETTY CASH,TRAINING&TRAVEL 149909 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $193,093.20 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3-29-95 149910 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS $5,914.44 CONSULTING SERVICE 149911 POLYPURE,INC. $24,135.22 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3.11-92 149912 POWER PROTECTION $432.48 MISC.HARDWARE 149913 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $112.00 ICE FOR SAMPLES 149914 PROMINENT FLUID CONTROL,INC. $799.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 02/06/96 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 02/07M POSTING DATE 02/07/98 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 149915 PRYOR REPORT $532.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 149916 PUBLIC SECTOR EXCELLENCE $7,200.00 TRAINING CONSULTANT-RISK MGMF 149917 PUMPING SOLUTIONS,INC. $298.33 PUMP PARTS 149915 PYRAMID FENCE COMPANY $2,275.00 FENCING INSTALLATION 149919 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $590.59 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS 149920 R&R INSTRUMENTS E1,837.70 ELECTRIC PARTS 149921 REMEDYTEMP $2.245.53 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 149922 DON RICHARDSON WATER TRUCK $8.218.50 WATER TANK 149923 RM MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL AND/OR RITTAL $2,126.67 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 149924 IAWRENCE ROOD $186.85 EXPENSE REPORT 149925 BANDON ENGINEERING,INC. $750.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 149926 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS &154.83 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 149927 BASCO ELECTRIC $2,220.00 CONTRACT SERVICES 149926 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTL $38,887.70 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.&8.94 149929 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $3,678.03 SPECIALTY GASES 149930 SENTIENT SYSTEMS,INC. $19.619.87 FACILITATOR SERVICES 149931 SHURELUCK SALES $3.819.75 TOOLS/HARDWARE 149932 THE SMITH GROUP $3,487.10 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 149933 SOLAR TURBINES INCORPORATED $304.98 MECHANICAL PARTS x 149934 SO COAST AIR QUALITY $2.594.79 PERMIT FEES 149935 SO CALIF EDISON CO S59A77.32 POWER 149936 SO CALIF EDISON CO $16,241.93 POWER 13 149937 SO.CALIFORNIA MARINE INST. 8800.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT n 149938 STAMEN Z.SPASSOFF P.E. $4,000.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19-2 1 149939 SUMMIT STEEL $602.02 METAL 149940 SUPERB ONE-HOUR PHOTO $36.26 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 149941 SYMCAS $5.657.92 SOFTWARE LICENSE 149942 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $2,728.03 MECHANICAL PARTS 149943 TIRE WAREHOUSE 91.113.62 TIRES 149944 TONER SYSTEM INTERNATIONAL $1.412.18 PRINTER SUPPLIES 149945 TRANE $352.41 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 149946 TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY,INC. $17,503.84 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.O.&1144 149947 TRUCK&ALTO SUPPLY,INC. $535.71 TRUCK PARTS 149948 TRUESDAIL LABS $1,128.10 LAB SERVICES 149949 JG TUCKER&SON,INC. $2.326.54 INSTRUMENT PARTS 149950 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $40300 LAB SUPPLIES 149951 UNISOURCEWOR BUTLER PAPER $837.49 OFFICE SUPPLIES 149952 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $805.70 PARCEL SERVICES 149953 VWR SCIENTIFIC $145.42 LAB SUPPLIES 149954 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $2,089.95 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 149955 VANIER BUSINESS FORMS $975.95 OFFICE SUPPLIES 149956 VARIAN ASSOCIATES,INC. $1.298.61 LAB SUPPLIES 149957 VERTEX SYSTEMS $3,570.26 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT 149958 VILLAGE NURSERIES $326.26 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 149959 WACKENHUT CORP. $27.296.79 CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS 149960 WAL-CON CONSTRUCTION CO. $170.041.19 CONSTRUCTION 5-37-3 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 02J06196 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 02/07/96 POSTING DATE 02107I85 WARRANTNO. VENDOR 149961 WAL-CON CONSTRUCTION CO. $8,400.89 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 149962 CARL WARREN&CO. $300,00 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR 149963 WAXIE $4,79261 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 149964 WESTERN CITY MAGAZINE $63.00 SUBSCRIPTION 149965 WESTERN COMPONENT SALES NORTH $417.32 LAB SUPPLIES 149966 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $35.993.49 CAUSTIC SODA MO&2395 149967 WEST-LTTE SUPPLY CO. E1,015.13 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 149968 WESCO $290.89 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 149969 WOLFE AND ASSOCIATES.INC. $1,688.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 149910 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. E291.57 LAB SUPPLIES 149971 YELLOW SPRINGS INSTRUMENT CO. $37.14 LAB SUPPLIES 149972 AG TECH COMPANY $58,580.03 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9A1 149973 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. $60.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL 149974 AWARDS B TROPHIES $147.50 PLAQUES 149975 BANANA BLUEPRINT $227.10 PRINTING M.O.1"7-94 149976 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $4,340.62 LAB SUPPLIES 149977 BIO-GRO DIVISION $84.345,91 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 4-26.95 149978 COMPUSERVE E126.02 COMPUTER SERVICES P1 149979 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $1,463.66 ELECTRIC PARTS 149980 ENCHANTER,INC. $3.500.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5-24-95 H 149981 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC, $867.70 LAB SERVICES 00 149982 EST SAND AND GRAVEL,INC. $769.35 ROAD BASE MATERIALS H 3 149983 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE E7,568.75 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.B. 10-9.91 � 149984 FILTER SUPPLY CO. E33.97 FILTERS 149985 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $689.16 LAB SUPPLIES 149986 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $360,68 PHOTO SUPPLIES 149987 NEW HORIZONS COMPUTER CENTERS,INC. E5,340.00 SOFTWARE TRAINING CLASSES 149988 BOLT DELIVERY $99.30 FREIGHT $2.602,740.34 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 02/06196 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 02/07M POSTING DATE 02/07196 SUMMARY AMOUNT 91 CONSTR FUND 9443.50 92 OPER FUND $3.135.08 12 CAP FAC FUND $11.91 82 CONSTR FUND $1,886.50 B3 OPER FUND $42,711.83 83 CAP FAC FUND $380.028.95 93 CONSTR FUND $1.074.60 05 OPER FUND $12.132.11 05 CONSTR FUND $670.50 96 CAP FAC FUND $59.54 86 CONSTR FUND $183.00 #7 OPER FUND $15.594.71 97 CAP FAC FUND $46.079.10 87 CONSTR FUND $515.00 411 OPER FUND $4,148.29 A11 CAP FAC FUND $190.778.76 011 CONSTR FUND $227.00 �y A14 CAP FAC FUND $17.05 K 6566 OPER FUND 52,454.64 y A566 CAP FAC FUND 170.082.68 b 9667 OPER FUND 2.258.68 -3 87&14 OPER FUND 6,341.96 JT OPER FUND $1,097,537.60 CORF $377,666.63 J SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $63,272.44 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL E183,218.02 $2,602,740.34 STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, 1 hereby certify that the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 held on , 19_fAwas duly posted for public inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on .23 , 19& IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this ` day of 1 s�G Penny Kyle, S tary ach of the Boards of Dire c rs of 5bunty Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14 of Orange County, California B£Irartnslf2]A