HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-02-28 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
y s . February 22, 1996
NOTICE OF MEETING
,ban.: JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
1714)962241
1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
mailing addr...: NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14
P0. Bcx8127 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Founmin Valleg CA
92728&8127
aareat address: WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 1996 - 7:30 P.M.
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fauntaln Valle,CA
927087018 DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
M.mbe
Agent ess The Regular Meeting of the Joint Boards of Directors of County Sanitation
• Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, wi0
citie. be held at the above locationtime and date.
Anaheim J /
Brea
Buena Perk
Cypr..
Way
Fountain Palley Boar a tary
Pullerton
Huntington Beach
Irvine
La Habra La Palma Tentatively - Scheduled Upcoming Meetings
Los Alamitos
Nesport Beach
Orange
Placentia STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday,February 28, 1996,at 5:30 pm
Santa Ann
Beal Beach
Blanton
Tustin OPERATIONS,MAINTENANCE AND - Wednesday, March 6, 1996,at 5:30 pm
vg.Pan: TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE
Yorba Linda
County of Orange
PLANNING, DESIGN AND - Thursday, March 7, 1996,at 5:30 pm
sanitary Distriate CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE
Cost. Mesa
Garden crave FINANCE,ADMINISTRATIVE AND - Wednesday,March 13, 1996,at 5:30 pm
Midway City HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE
Water Districts
trvine Ranch EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - Wednesday,March 20, 1996, at 5:30 pm
A Public Wastewater and Environmental Management Agency Committed to Proti the Environment Blnce 1954
JOINT BOARD MEETING DATES
Month Joint Board Meetings
February Feb 28, 1996
March Mar 27, 1996
April Apr 24, 1996
May May 22, 1996
June Jun 26, 1996
July Jul 24, 1996
August Aug 28, 1996
September Sep 25, 1996
October Oct 23, 1996
November Nov 20, 1996
December Dec 18, 1996
January Jan 22, 1997
February Feb 26, 1997
/COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
r e
February 22, 1996
phone:
(7143 9e2z411
msiUm,address: To the Chair and Members
P.O.Box 8127 of the Joint Boards of Directors
Founmin Valley,CA
92726.8127 Subject: Board Letter
street adds..:
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley,CA
92708-7018 The following are items that you may find interesting. If you need additional
information on any of the items, please call me.
Revised Water Anenda issued by EPA Assistant Administrator
Member On January 17, 1996, EPA Assistant Administrator for Water Bob Perciasepe issued
AgB""°6 a revised agenda for FY 96-97, outlining EPA's priorities for the Office of Water. The
• new agenda builds on the agenda developed at the end of 1994 and adds improved
Miss communications to the operating framework elements—applying "common sense"to
all activities and "place-based" organization. The agenda also incorporates
A"BB'a Administrator Browner's goal of using twenty percent for all program resources for
Buena Park place-based environmental protection, and integration of watershed management into
Cypress all program activities. In addition to continuing emphasis on improved drinking water
F4uatain Valley protection and wet weather controls, comprehensive wetlands management has been
Fullerton added as a programmatic priority. Emphasis remains on the urban wet weather
Huntington Beach P 9 P Y P
Irvina advisory committee established last year and on improving the state nonpoint source
La Habra pollution protection programs. EPA is currently working with states to develop
La Pelme guidance on strengthening state non point source programs.
Los Ale rhos 9 9 9 P P 9
Newport Beach
Orange Attached is a copy of the synopsis of the National Water Program Agenda for the
Placentia Future: 1996-1997.
Santa Ana
Seal Beach
Stanton Recent Settlement Agreements with Permittees
Tustin
l.11e Park In the event a ermittee exceeds emit limits, administrative complaints are issued
rorba Linde P P P
that can include penalties. Hearings are scheduled to address the complaints. In
county of grange accordance with Resolution No. 95-112, a committee consisting of the Director of
Finance, the Director of Technical Services, and General Counsel have the authority
Sanitary Districts to negotiate and enter into agreements up to $50,000 and enforce compliance orders.
Cocoa Move Firms that have entered into settlement agreements and the penalties follow:
Garden Grove 9
Midway City
Chevron U.S.A. Production Company $20,000
water Districts Stevens Metal Finishing, Inc. $12,000
Irvine Ranch Imperial Containers & Display, Inc. $10,000 and 2 days
permit suspension
South Coast Circuits $23,000
Alphanetics $42,000
PCA Metal Finishing $60,000
Pentadyne Circuits $23,000
Anaheim Plating & Polishing $20,000
A-Able $28,027.21
American Septic $62,001.15
A Public Wastewater and Environmental Management Agency Committed to Protecting toe Environment Since 1954
Chair and Members of
the Joint Boards of Directors
Page 2
February 22, 1996
Early Retirement Incentive
Since the beginning of the year, four employees have taken advantage of the early retirement
incentive. One had 31 years of service and two had 24 and 21 years, respectively. There are
two others that will be retiring by the end of March. This saves money and gives management
increased Flexibility.
Grand Jury Visit
The newly sealed Grand Jury visited the Sanitation Districts on January 30. Staff made a
presentation on our mission and operation, and gave them a tour of the treatment plant. Many of
the members were unaware of our agency and there were many questions.
Executive Summary of Source Control Annual Report
Attached is a copy of the Executive Summary of the Annual Report for the Source Control
Division. Section 1.3, Program Summary, provides a very informative overview of the activities
of the division, and many of these will be used for benchmarking. If you have questions on this
Summary, please contact Mahin Talebi, Source Control Manager, at 714/962-2411.
extension 3800.
Cellular Telephone Policy
As a result of several newspaper articles on cellular phone use at other agencies, staff
formalized the attached cellular telephone policy. As in the past, all personal phone calls are the
responsibility of the employee. For those employees that have their own cellular phones, the
Districts reimburse business calls only upon presentation of an invoice from the cellular company
which has been approved by their supervisor.
Status of Bacterial Problems at Bolsa Chica State Beach
The bacterial problems at Boise Chica State Beach continue to defy our efforts to find an
identifiable source of contamination. The sanitary system at the State Park remains the most
likely source, but we have so far been unable to identify a precise location that is leaking. We
have, however, made some progress. Since sewage from the rest rooms, which is fresh water,
would "float" on the more brackish groundwater, we have been sampling groundwater seepage at
low tide. We have found an area of the beach where the seepage is both contaminated with
bacteria and somewhat lower in salinity than the sea water, suggesting that it may be coming
from a leak in the sanitary system. Unfortunately, dye testing has been unsuccessful in
pinpointing a leak. Alternatives for locating the leak include pressure testing the system and/or
video-taping the lines upstream of the contaminated seepage. We will meet soon with the
County's Health Department and the State Park officials to determine the next steps.
Chair and Members of
the Joint Boards of Directors
Page 3
February 22, 1996
Clarifying Municipal Liability under Superfund
AMSA believes that the original Superfund statute provided safeguards for municipalities from
third-party litigation. For several years, AMSA members have worked under the assumption that
publicly-owned treatment works (POTWs) were protected from Superfund liability by the careful
wording of the definition of"facility' in the statute to exclude publicly-owned treatment works, and
through an exemption provided for"federally-permitted releases." Excluding POTWs from the
statute's standard of strict,joint and several liability makes sense.
As a service to the community, POTWs collect and treat wastewater from a variety of industrial
sources, including those that regularly utilize hazardous and toxic chemicals in the production
process. POTWs can provide this service because they regulate the amounts of such chemicals
at the points of discharge to the POTW, and because they operate highly-effective and efficient
facilities that meet and achieve water quality standards and produce high-quality residual
biosolids. In these roles, the POTWs act in concert with federal and state regulations as co-
regulators under the Clean Water Act. POTWs do not generate the regulated waste, they
receive it in controlled amounts, transport it to their treatment works and treat it. As such, they
are wholly passive with respect to any such waste that may be released.
Nevertheless, recent litigation assessing liability against a POTW for a release of a hazardous
pollutant being transported to the treatment works by pipeline has left POTWs vulnerable to
Superfund-related third-party lawsuits. In AMSA's view, this constitutes an unintended shift in
responsibility for hazardous waste cleanup from private generating parties to taxpayers. Without
a clarifying amendment to Superfund, additional restrictions on industry would be the only
effective means of avoiding liability. This remaining option would impose a significant financial
burden on not only local industries, but the municipal economies that they help to support.
Excluding POTWs from the federal Superfund statue will not compromise the environment.
State laws ensure that, when negligent, POTWs will maintain responsibility for the costs of
environmental remediation.
Specifically, AMSA is urging Congress to:
Amend the Superfund statute to clarify the exclusion of POTWs from the statute's
standard of strict,joint and several liability.
Status of SAWPA Agreement
Late last year, the Districts' staff and the staff of the Santa Ana Watershed Management Project
(SAWPA) finalized a new draft agreement between the two agencies which would settle the
longstanding differences on SAWPA's payments to the Districts for treatment and disposal
capacity. The agreement was presented to the SAWPA Board of Directors in January. The
Chair and Members of
the Joint Boards of Directors
Page 4
February 22, 1996
SAWPA directors had only a short time to review the agreement, but believed that its general
approach was fair to both parties. They did, however, want to spend more time discussing
specific provisions with staff to better understand how the agreement might affect their
relationships with their customers and member agencies. The SAWPA members were also
concerned that each individual member not be liable for the debts of the other members.
During the subsequent discussions with SAWPA directors, further issues were raised that are
associated with the internal cost allocation procedures for SAWPA. These issues do not pertain
to the terms and conditions of the agreement with the Sanitation Districts; however, some
SAWPA member agencies have taken the position that these should be solved prior to SAWPA's
signing the agreement because the cost allocation will affect each member's share of the capital
charge imposed. While these issues are being discussed, the SAWPA Board does not plan to
consider the agreement.
Prior to the completion of the draft agreement, Joint Chair Cox met with SAWPA Chair Wayne
Holcomb. The Chairs concurred that the draft agreement was equitable and should move
forward. Chair Cox plans to write Chair Holcomb to request his assistance in moving the draft
agreement forward and bringing this matter to a conclusion. If there is no response from
SAWPA within a reasonable period of time, the Joint Boards may have to consider further action
to resolve the dispute on purchase of additional treatment and disposal capacity.
Possible Termination of Contract with Anionic Polymer Vendor
At the August 8, 1995 meeting the Directors authorized a contract for anionic polymer with
Polypure, Inc. The contract included a termination clause if the quality and required quantities of
polymer fail to conform to the specifications. Staff has determined that the product does not
perform in accordance with the specifications and have given the supplier a letter of intent to
terminate the contract at the end of a 14-day testing period on an alternate product. If the results
of the testing are unsatisfactory, the Directors will be requested to terminate the contract and
award a new contract to another supplier. Depending on when the final results are received, the
action may be on this month's agenda or on the March agenda.
AMSA Recoanition in the Congressional Record
Attached is a copy of the bipartisan statement in the Congressional Record on November 7,
1995, by Representatives Bud Shuster(R-PA), Chair of the House Public Works and
Transportation Committee and Jim Oberstar(D-MN), the Committee's Ranking Minority Member,
commemorating the Association's 25th Anniversary and marking the official date of its
incorporation.
Chair and Members of
the Joint Boards of Directors
Page 5
February 22, 1996
CASA Report on Constitution Revision Commission and Privatization
Attached is a January 7, 1996 fax from CASA on the latest activities of the CRC, as well as a
summary of the Reason Foundation Report on Privatization.
Next Directors Workshop on the Water Conservation and Reclamation Element of the
Strategic Plan
The next workshop for the Directors on the Water Conservation and Reclamation element of the
Strategic Plan has been tentatively scheduled for Saturday, May 4. 1 hope that you all calendar
this important meeting and plan to attend. Staff is already working on this event, and
informational material will be sent well before the meeting for your review.
High Settleable Solids Incident
On Sunday, February 18, 1996, an operational change in the secondary treatment (activated
sludge or"AS") portion of the Districts' Reclamation Plant No. 1 resulted in a permit violation for
final effluent"settleable solids." The laboratory measured and reported a value of 4.0 mUL (the
instantaneous permit limit is 3.0 mUL). The increase in solids was probably caused by
Operations rapidly increasing the flow to the AS Plant which caused a surge of water through the
treatment system allowing settleable solids to enter the final effluent stream. Notification to
Operations by the laboratory of a high reading of settleable solids in the interplant line allowed
Operations to lower the flow through the AS plant to correct the cause of the effluent violation.
On Tuesday afternoon, February 20, 1996, the laboratory analyst who did the analyses reported
the violation to his supervisor. The supervisor notified the Environmental Management Division
(EMD) which immediately notified the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa
Ana Region. Affected parties within the Districts held a meeting to review operational practices,
sampling, and report procedures to identify areas that need improvement. Operations has
reviewed treatment procedures with the operators to prevent future occurrences, is evaluating
continuous monitors, and will implement guidelines to assure immediate reporting of permit
violations to EMD. The incident lasted less than two hours, and it did not have the potential to
affect the public health or environment.
Bay Bridge Spill Report
As you probably have already heard, the Bay Bridge Pump Station, located in Newport Beach on
Pacific Coast Highway between Dover and Bayside Drive, overflowed at approximately 5:50 a.m.
on February 22, causing several thousand gallons of raw sewage to overflow manholes and back
up into residential units. The cause of the problem is being investigated, but it appears that a
water level sensor malfunctioned, causing the pumps in the station to shut down. Because of
the malfunction, the pumps can only be started manually until the problem is corrected.
Chair and Members of
the Joint Boards of Directors
Page 6
February 22, 1996
After receiving a call from the City of Newport Beach at 5:50 a.m., we immediately dispatched
maintenance crews to the pump station. While they were an route, at approximately 6 a.m.,
maintenance workers from the City of Newport Beach made their way into the pump station and
restarted the pumps manually, relieving the overflow condition. Initial reports are that sixteen
homes were affected by the spill.
We immediately dispatched additional personnel to the site to assist local residents in clean-up
efforts and to handle media relations.
We will be conducting a full investigation of the incident and will be providing a detailed report at
the February 28 Joint Board meeting.
Update on the Financial Information System
The response date on the RFP for the Financial Information System was extended for thirty days
to ensure that we had a competitive group of proposals. At the request of several vendors, we
have agreed to extend for an additional seven days. First round of proposals are now due from
vendors on March 14, 1996. The RFP has been simplified to encourage response; software only
will be the focus of the initial proposals. Several firms have expressed interest in the project and
have been on site to review our technical library. The proposals will first be reviewed for
responsiveness and then for content or qualifications. Selected finalist vendors will go through a
more rigorous proposal process including site visits and demonstrations of real installations.
Staff is planning to make a recommendation for the new Financial Information System at the May
FAHR Committee meeting. Implementation is scheduled for FY '97. We hope to have the
payroll module operational by January '97, followed by the General Ledger in the spring. The
new system is expected to be fully operational by FY '98.
If you would like additional information on any of the above items, please call me.
Donald F. McIntyre
General Manager
DFM:jt
a.aw000awnr ()Lrmwnneae
Attachments: Synopsis of National Water Program Agenda.
Executive Summary of Source Control Annual Report.
Cellular Telephone Policy.
Recognition of AMSA, Congressional Record, November 7, 1995.
Fax from CASA, February 7, 1996, Constitution Revision Commission and
Privatization.
0126/96 15:17 ENS RESO-RCES INC 002
National Water Program
Agenda for the Future: 1996-1997
IOModYdian
Imidug back over 1995,I see a year of uanondo er progress and change for the Agency and the National
Water Program. Changing rite way we work and reorganizing the Regional offices nude this a demanding
year. The continuing budget uncertainty and government shut-downs haw emoted new hurdles. We mood to
remind ourselves that the nation's rivers,lakes,estuaries and ooran and groundwater resource cautious to need
our stewardship and protection, "to budget controversies can be distracting and challenging,they pale in
comparison to the tavuonmental and health protection needs of the nation's waters. We main and we sae
remain focused an our vital mission of providing that protection. 1 want io thank every employeo for the
dedication and persevaance you have shown,and for the good work you have done each day toward providing
sefq clean water for all Americans.
The Updated Agenda
Ilia second Agenda maps this year's steps toward our goal,it doe vet set a complctcy new direction.Our
priority frameworks—the oonmemr some:and community based approaches should enhance all of our work.
Our solid foundation of protection programs will enable us to reinvigorate our efforts to assure safe drinking
watr and to link and improve our important wet weather programs. We will also commie to seek ways to
mcdemize our management of the National Water program.
Over the post several years,we haw been making significant changes m our wetlands program to enhance
protection and make regulations man fair,flexible and eRbctive. I added wedamis numagement ar a program
prlorrry in this Agenda in order to emphasize the importance 1 place on using the charged procedures and
relationships with co-rmgularms and those we regulate. Viewing wcdards holistically—on a watershed basis—
not only shengdrens our community-based emphasis,it improve our ability to protest these vital resources.
We mane focus on achieving the goal of no net loss of wetlands and the long term goal of increasing the quality
and quantity of the Nation's wetlands resource base.
lmproving eommemimnon with our parmers m awironmemah protection and with the public at large is my
second addition to the Agenda. I believe that water program mployous must rlrarly communicate the
importance of our mission and how the work war do helps pwplc in cities,owns and rural areas avioss the
nation. In 1996-1997 we will concentrate an shap®ng communication skills,malung our information more
acoesible to the public,describing the Importance of clean waive and safe drinking water to Americans,and
providing opportunities for the public to let us know their views. In addition,I have a personal oam ahnicat to
better camm mucato with Water Progreso employ=all aaoss the country using imegreted electronic mail,
voice mail,and other now technologies.
01/26/% 15:ie ENS RESOj?CES INC 003 ,
During 1995 the Agency,together with States and Tribes,created the National Fnvboame dal Pcrfomwrco
Pammbip System(NEPPS)and Perfomane¢PaMxa Wp Omens(PPOs). Creation of this system marks"
important change in our reletimitip with Sores and Tribes and undmourc,our com aumncut to empowerment
of State and Tribal programs. Our nest step Is to harmonize these new admirmstmtiwe tool,with
Headquarters-Regional Management Agreements to allow unproved elrciermy and coordination between
headquarters,State,and regional roles. Part ID of the Agenda explains how we will use this system to become
more o136etiw in getting curjobs done.
We must also tram the public as a partner in environmental protection. We must fad the most cost offodive
and ofeient ways to meta meal communities enviroemenal nods wink carrying out our Iefjslativc mandates.
We trust easum environmental Justice by providing equal access to the infrastructure our programs support,
equal access to participate m our programs,and equal protection under the laws wo implement. Finally.all of
our partners must have the opportunity to participate in discussions leading to decisions about what works best
to bring about dean.safe water.
What this Agenda Means to You
Like last year's Agenda,this document saves as the overall guidance for the National Water Program.This
Agenda has grown out of many disaasions with the Regius and the program offaoes. It ommmnieates what I
want us to aaonplish so that wa can all pull together toward common goela. It will sum as the blueprint and
starting point for developing the FY 1997 Mangemet Agreements between Headquarters and the Regions and
as major input to R%4w-Sate and Region-Tribe agteaxats.
This Agenda needs our partners'support if we are to aoam,ptish it. No task can be conducted by EPA in
isolation,without complete consultation and partnership with our Federal,Sate,Tribal and other EPA media
program partners. Therefore,I hope that each water employee will sham the Agenda with people inside and
outside the Agency.
I appreciate your willinlpuas to accept the challenges of changing the way wo do ourjob. Thanks for your
patients,continuing vision and dodication to our mission in the face of sonic of the Agency's greatest
challenges.
2
01/26/% 15:18 ENS RESaJRCFS IIIC 004
7
National Water Program Agenda for the Future
1. Priarity Operating Fmotmork
Throe overriding eonoepts ttarac the National Water Programs Agenda for the Future: common stasc,place-
based program ddivory,and guul uummuniraLlm. The ability to focus on this operating framework is built on
a solid foundation ofbastc wmer programs,analytical work,data development,management tools,and
accountability systems. Our operating framework will common to rely on that foundation and will focus,
sharpen and shape implemcnest..a ofthe basic water programs that have successfully improved our wafers for
the last twenty-five years.
A. Appfy Common Sense is AR We Do
The National Water Program is committed to reinmition—finding and using innovative ways to do curjobs
better. We am increasing Em l ility,enoouragiag oellabmatimr and innovation,and cutting red tape while
retaining programmatic and fiscal aoronmability. We are keeping what works well and changing what does
not We are,seeking common soso solutions—smarter,ehraper ways to get owunsurnamal results.
Activities wc71 purauc to promote common srasc approaches include -
• Suppornog proposals far rcmvrata g environmental regulation:
-Project XL(excellence&leadership)pilot efforts of companies,facilities, States and conmmnifies to
achieve custctfoctive environmental results that exceed these required by law;
"Common Sense Initiative that focuses on sk industry scams;
-Promming effluent trading in watersheds;
-Simplifying the pemuthng process.
• Combnuing our comprehensive reinvcntim of the NPOE3 program We will continue heavy
invlvenrent of stakeholders in this ongoing process that includes steps to reduce pamimoc monitoring
and reporting requirements by 25%,streamline permit application data rcquirrnraas,and further
expand the use of e6'icimt general P=nts;
• Identifying dayto-dny impkntmtatum activities that do not make sense,by asking our co-rcgulators,
the public,and those we regulate. Making appropriate changes that TcBM Agency-wide initiatives on
customer ac w,e0im uncy,oversight reduction,and streamlining;
• Examining data collccum and reporting efforts and systems to ddcrmine what can be reported
electronically and reduced or eliminated in the interest of reducing reporting burden—without reducing
our ability to track programs,eminmetzmal trcneb,and funds;
• Using the EPAStam Opwating Committee to identify(through a continuous feedback process)and
ehsmgc or eliminate low-value®dded work-
3
01/26/96 15:19 EMS RESO-RCES INC 005
B. Organize, Work and Co»unanfeate to Hotear "Places"
People are eomemed about problems in their local streams,watn supplies,landfills,incinerators or wetlands—
problems they can identify with because they can sty then to their own comommucs. 'through the
Admimstratmfs Community-Based Environmental Ptotoction(CBEP)Initiative,the Agency will focus 20%of
all modia programs'resource,including Regional resources,on actions that will promote plaeobased
mvuoarrounal protection.
EPA caa be dirctly involved is only a Bactimr otall communities, so moat of our resource must be used to
promote and cuable placnbascd environmental promotion by others. EPA must help to create a framework
within which emmnamity efforts ran be led by others,while EPA provides tools,assistance,and infertlatlon as
coded. EPA assisancc mums moncatigg our bast programs and wodC+mg with states to reorient their
programs;it means rodesigaing sane regulatory and non-rcguWory programs to oomplcaumt local efforts
better;and it means promoting this approach in other orgmimtime.
Because EPA one only be in a few place,we will need to carefully select those priority places where we will
be directly involved in carrying out to work,platys where we will participate,and places wberc we will net be
directly involved but will help others to acb m e teir goals by providing tools or technical assistance. Our
experimx with the watershed approach has giwp us a good start in identifying and accomplishing to
objectives of CBEP.
We will build oi the success of the waterbbod approach by seeking more opportunities to integrate our
programs with thine of other media offices so that we era assst communities to perform oomprehwa ve
envirurateam protection. I believe that each Regional Water Program and the Office of Water medr to
establish em Internal structa r, like a working group, to assure cross program integration ofCBFP
Working groups will be able to identify actions being taken by other parts of the Agency that"aid affect
surface and ground water quality,and take steps to convey the perspective or and share id'ormation from water
programs.
Water prograns can share the tools developed by and to lesions leaned Born the National Estuary Program,
the Octal Water Body programs,and small"smlc watershed projects to spud the progr ss of plat based
efforts across the nation.
To edrawn the Agency's ability to hnplranent the CBEP initiative,OW and/or the Regions will:
• Work with Stales,Tribes and local gmnmurrunt units to dctermvrc which tools(criteria,atandardv,
monitoring and measumnm metledelogics,risk asswsmwu methods,waershd education and
outreach,and fate and transport models)EPA can develop or share with them through training,and
how EPA can use its authorities to assist them in implaaenting CBEP(including surface and ground
water Itregrains);
• Work with States to develop Tow Maximum Daily l.oads/Wastcload AllocationV1,,d Allocations
for priority water quality limited - - -'-'wararbodkis. With our partners,apply a flexible
approach to develop and implement warm quality-band permit limits and best management practices
to roduco loadings so that water quality standards and deippatod urn etc met;
• Develop new ednput"models integrating GIS inforeamil With foie and transport models to facilitate
ef0uerht trading among point and—point sources within watadrds,ad train Regions and Stance in
their use;
4
4
• Develop the Water portion of the Agency-wide multi-year CBEP Action Plan and deploy national
water program FT&as needed to do place-based work with States,Tribes and local goverrmeuts.
Work with our co-regulators to achieve a goal of oncalim Staldfribal programs to support CBEP;
• Work with Au Programs to support implc me alion of Section 112 of the Clean Air Act,to assess
pmblCtm;dad develop strategies to reduce air dcposWm of ch o icals,hmvy metals(especially
mercury),nutrtarts and other pollutants(especially nitrogen dimuclo)to waters of the United Stales
through pollution prevention,and cooperate in the Croat Waters related activities;
• Establish foams with the Office of Enforcement and Comply(OECA)and its Regional
tarmtcrparts to coordinate our priorities and activr cs;
• Issue an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulc along reviewing the criteria and standards program in
view of the trend toward watershed and cross-media approaches in marry States/f'riboa,and issue a
water quality Criteria Development Plan describing the ilm n:direction of the criteria Program;
• Continue integrating NPDES Programs into the Watershed Prmocaion Approach by allowing
resources dedicated to developing permits to vary depending on euvironrnemW impacts of each sour«,
supporting dcvdopakm of Statewide watershed protection frameworks to partnership with
Statrsllfribes,and by surnmlimn and consolidating information requirements for NPDES.
C Corrrruanhsre Program Actions and Policies Max Effectively
The National Water Program is responsible for protecting and restoring the quality of our nation's waters.
From providing raft,reliable souroes of cloaking water to prutcrring valuable habitat for fish and wildlife to
clearing up toxic pollution in our rivers and streams,our efforts help pro azt public health and the covironmmmt
and enure a better quality of life for all Americans. We need strong coordination with our co-rogulators at
State and Tribal agencies and continuous input Gan environmental and public incrust groups,private industry,
and the public.
Much greater-emphasis is needed on communications for Were key stakcholdcrs to understand and fully
participate to the decision-making pree ssys dud drive our actions In particular,we must emphasis the
results our work products. We most Canvey information in plain,simple and concise language, improve the
prim quality of our materials,and build stranger emmnweicaIion networks.
To improve our ability to exmvnnnicasc,the National Water Program will:
• Desmgrate spccifie staff in each program to idcd4,prepare for,and manage conmmun ewcur
opportunities,including:
-Prepare non-tcehniml fad sheets for all major policy and regulatory actions(as well as commonly
misunderstood issues)so that stakeholders can understand what is being done and what remelts(Le.,
ecological and economic bcncfts)are to be expected;
-Publieia the availability of products and services designed to provide the public with Miter
information about water issuq such as the national Sat Drinking Water and Wctlands hollince,the
National Fish Consumption database,and wale, Interact addresses;
-Initiate a process enabling us to emtununieudc national andcommunhy-bawd asuLLs.of program
activities at bast annually to the general public,the Oovemors,stakeholders and Congress,using both
indicators of environmental conditions and programmatic activity measures.
5
91/26i% 15:20 ENS RESO;RCES INC eel
• Expand Use of the Internet mallow greater access to water-rotated data and information,including
timely information on specific program actions and decisions;
• Use electronic news bulletins,voice mail messages,cad other tesbaalogics to barer communicate with
Headquarters and Regional anployees of the national water Program;
• Develop,is Cooperation whh slates,other agencies and the Interagency Task Force on Monitoring,a
national water quality data base reflecting basin-level data
N. Priority Areas for Program Revisions
This Agenda includes three priority areas for program rVishona to achieve the goals of protecting human health
and the rnviromorffi.
A. PrWed PahUC Hmlu by F•.,•rdrrg that Drinking Water is Safi
The Ad mansTMatlna has co rlinucd to work with Conguss od a package of reforms to the Safes Drinking Water
Ad to theme on the greatest risks,strcamhu cumbersome regulations,reduce costs, stimulate pollution
prevention,and belts protect public health through fording to help communities upgrade their drinking water
facilities. OW will continue to support theses principles in legislative debates and will implement then
ad,,MustraLve[y to the extent possible poling reauthorization.
These principles are,emsistent with the results of a comprehensive reassessment oftho Office of Wands
drinking water and ground water pruVmns. In term,that rev',ow has led to a proposed redirection of drinking
water activities to Casure that EPA invests its limited msc urns in areas that wit[yield the greatest health
benefits(risk reduction)and assists State,Tribal and local agencies to do the same. Spaific actions to
implement these principles include:
• Imegrate Regional and State program activities into priorities identified in the reassessment pmcrss:
• Craninuc discussions with stakeholders(water arpplimt,States,Tribes,public health and
envuwmhvdal oegeniratious)while implementing the four primary objectives iereladed is EPMa
'Drinking Water Program Redirection Proposal',issued for commant on November 30, 1995. Tho
four primary objectives arc
Sound science and adequate data;
-Riskbascd priorities for setting highyuality st ndans;
Strong flexible partnerships with States,Tribes and local governments in implamcn at on;and
-Community baacd,a fcctivo soµrcc wear protection;
• Impl—voluntary eHoris to achieve greater public health prototon results,such as the Parmerehip
for Safe Drinking Water thin mounnages public water syat®s to optimize removal ofwaterbors,
pathogens from their facititics. This year we need to develop new partnerships for source water
prma tiun that will prumWc wale udlitici efforts to protect the aourccs of their drinking water
supplies,e.g.,rivers,streams,reservoirs and ground watma
6
01/26/96 15:21 Rr5 RE9aRCE9 INC 008
Y
• Assist States and Tribes in cowdinating ambicrit and complim oc roonitoring to support source water
asscasment and protection;
' Assist States and Tnbw"ring small systems'capacity througb such approaches as technical
assistance and financing coordination.
B. Pfdws the Emlronmmt by/rrTr byg We Warhr Flow Controls
Water quality inventories haw idmtiflcd wet woad w flows(including agricultural ru toff,c®rbinod sewer
oywflows, urban storm water,and sanitary sewn overflown)as the largest remaining threat to water quality.
The Admmistratioo's Cleats Water Initiative focuses on reducing this threat to water quality,on reducing costs,
and on providing States and local governments with greater fiendbiliry to solw wet weather problems.
Consistent with those principles,the National Water Program will take timer specific actions:
• Work with the urban wrl-weadtw advisory group,to:
-address policy and tw.hnital issues related to urban wet we lbw—urban rtmol i storanvatcr and
sanitary sewer overflow(SSO),and the Combined Se:wa Overflow(CSO)Policy implarncmation,
etteaMice monitoring regduad in the existing smrm water program and cone idaw aerating State
reporting roqum3nmts,coordinate with Mated CZM and 319 programs on a watershed bears,and
-identify,and take appropriate steps to reduce the slating burden of the Phase I Storm water Program,
consider changes to existing monitoring and permitting requirements,and continue cimenining ways to
streamline slannwatcr Phase 11 program;
• Ensure that all NPDES pemdts required for municipal separate storm sewer sy3tons(saving over
100,000 people)are issued in FY 1996/19,97 and clearly identify wet wathw controls;
• improve the cf1belivmess of the Section 319 wnpoim sourer program by ismring new tuitional
guidanm, inaugurating a new round of more effectiw StatoTribe programs focused on priority
warcrsheds and envirmmnattal results,and eliminating the competitive grams upplieation process;
• Confined animal feeding operations are ran important source of water pollution both lolly and
downstream in some places. We will completo Suidanoc concerning 1row to address these sources;
• Use pollution prevention, inc ntiw-based volunteer efforts writ outreach to address those traditionally
not regulated eon-point souroca that arc contributing to water quality problems.
C En mge Comprehensive Welands Mamgrmrcnt Usbrg Piac BasedApFro ch s
The National Water Program is implemrnti%the Prcsident's 40-poim plan to cahancc wetlaMe protection,
make walands regulation more fair and flexible,and move toward achieving the goal of no overall out loss of
wetlands. We have wotkcd long and hard in sicarnlinig the permits process,reep®diog to mnam,of smwm
lattaownws and fames,improving couperatlon with the regulated community in general,and w pending the
role of States,Tribes and local govcmmaas in protecting wedands. In cooperation with odrw rogu4staa,we
haw made gnat progress in reducing duplication and increasing consistency uncia the Clam Water omit Food
Security Acts(Swsmpbusrcr), in si nplifyn'g wctlannds identification,proridirgllouibilily to parrot apphcn t
increasing overall program efficiwoy,and providing information to hmdowners and to the Sweral public.
7
01/26/96 15:22 13t5 RESOURCES INC
009
To further advance implrmeutation of the President's August 1993 Wetlands Plan and the EPA Wctlaru%
Strategic Plan,the National Water Program will:
• Build the capacity of States,Tribes and local govcnvnents to perfmm wetlands preservation,
restoration and management by:
-Encouraging and supporting the developmart and hnplcrtumatim of State/rrihal Wetlands
Conservation Plans(SWCPs)through workshops,grants and technical essistatke an that by the year
20M at least 25 Stmes will have adopted SWCPs with rtnrchanisms for wetlands assessment,sbutegic
geographic prioritiwtion of ac"lics,rrsourwbasod monitoring and reporting,local planing and
compliance;
-Enonursging assuvitlton of regulatory authority,or alternative mechanienn that rely on StAmTribal
decision making such m Statewide gweral permita and streamlined cortiEcatioms,
-Developing truing oa how watershed nwragensm Plane can comply with and better utilize Section
404.cnsuri ig integration of programmatic and aeavitlR-based general pennies,mitigation bankng
and abbreviated general pemtits;
• Work with other Federal and State agencies to expedite timlopmcm,field testing of procedures to
improve wetlands assessment techniques,and increase the use of such procedures to wsure that
regulatory decisions rented actual wetlands functions and values at the proposed project sites;
• Aggressively imptcment wetlands mitigation banking;
• Provide information to the public and support landowners intcrcnod in voluntary wetlands
stewardship.
M. Cban&g How We Get the Job Done- New Administrative and Management Tools
We must continue to carry out the basic mandates of our enabling legislation. We also must lewn to rely oa
nor partners(the States,Tribes,and those we regulate)to implemwd the National Water Program. However,
in implerrerrtirg our mission through partnerships,water programs must strike the right balance between
flexibility and accountability.
A_ Building on the 1996 Management!Agreements, Use New Administrative and No daml Mechanisms
ro limProve Program Delivery
The States we our eo- etc rs and am responsible for frmrfing nuny programs today. We must continue to
build capacity where it is needed. We also need to mruppim the States that have capacity and work with than
to ono Our oombi ted nesoumea most elfecb sly.
Most of the States have long temn strategic plans either completed or in devdopurnt. Many of these pleas
have developed statewide priorities. Many Stains know what their worst remaining eaviroamrntal pmbl=
ere,they have thought through the best ways to solve those problens,and they know how to most effectively
use Federal finds. Through the new systems we am piloting in 1996,the National Environmental Pcrfiormmcc
Partnership System(NEPPS)and Performance Partnership Grants Performance Pmtourship Gmnts will
require authority fran Congress.(PPGs),vw will provide the States with the added ficxibility they need to
pnnduce the rnvirounrental results we all seek.
8
01/rb96 15:22 ENS RESO.RCES INC 010
The Agenda will guide development of the FY 1997 Managmrcnt Agrcm=ts so that they can serve as
Regional Program Guidance when the RcIponv negotiate FY 1997 pmgranmiatic agreements m NEPPS
agroemeats With States,Tnbo-EPA Agreanents(rEAs),and work plans with States and Tribes for categorical
and Peifomancc Partnership Grants(PPGs).
We will anocuragc the use of PPGs by Stales and Tribes to cmnbine funds from two or nacre of 16 eligible
grard progruns. PPGs shmld allow States and Tribes tame flexibility to address their meet pressing
eavirmnental probltans,implereent multi-media solutions within a watershed,and improve rmiromoeatal
performance. PPGs should also provide admeregbauve savings and strengthen parfiembips bawxa EPA and
the States or Trim. When nezotiadng PPGs,the Regions must ensum that the core program requinmtents
which grants are recent to support ore being met.
To ensure tow all have the same vision for our programs,National Water Prograrn Directors and I will visit
esch Region in 1996 to discuss the Agenda,its relationsirip to Mmiagemat Agrmnents and other
administrative and managuneot tools,Regional experia cc in implementing the Agenda,and development of the
FY 1997 Maoagemcat Agrornrents. We will ose this ummumty to hear from the States end Tribes as wen.
As a result of these visits we will develop a mnbral understanding of what cmrstinaes a good basic water
program,and the quality of State/rnbo performance in implementing water programs that would qualify for
furdw reductions in oversight. This W R assure the States and Tribes of consistency across the nation. We
will also develop policy to help define when and how the National Program Managers may need to ba involved
in discussions of NEPPS State-Regional agreements,and TEAS, The goal is to develop a xeamless
tmplartcntation of national,regional,and State water progrann s with feedback mochenisms in every direction.
To be more effective we will:
• Use the Management Agreement process and our growing experience with environmental indicators to
help us prepare to plan,measure achicvematts(outputs,outcome and service levels)of each
program,and link our budget to those achicvanents under the Govemmvrt Petforruadee&Results
Act(GPRA)in FY 1999;
• Revise Region-Office of Water Maoageamad Agrocameits between the Assistant Administrator and
Rtgitmal Administrators in 1996 for FY 1997 to provide greater flexibility but retain accountability
for gang pt'o6r✓ra work done;
• Use the National Water Program priority enviromnental indicators and milestones to measure
progress toward our national erivironmeatal goals along with annual wrrm,itrriwts and programmatio
activity measures in all Management Agreements;
• Prvnwte delegation of operating programs to Starts whenever possible;
• Use simple,strtaml'in d,standard(mostly electrenio)rnetbods for reporting under the Management
Agreernads;
• Regions will develop strong multi-media Environmental Performance Partnership Agreemannts and
Tribal-EPA Agtenmeats to enable States and Tribes to focus attention on nationA State or Tribal,
and Regional priorities;
• Organize,with States,an EPA-State Operating Cotomince to provide greater overall coordination.
9
V♦ COST. SJGJ GV7 RCOLIJ'4.00 IIY. VJll
A lmpfove Work with rheAmerican Indian Environmental 002ce(AIEO) Y
The Office of Water and all EPA media pmgrzms will remain directly involved with Tribal govemne is
beeausc Ue environmmtai managomem capabilhim of most Tribe are still in the early stages of development.
Regional water programs will assist Tubes in developing comprehpaivc water quality programs. Symboli*g
our involvement,Regional orgat&atima responsible for Tribal liaison will sign die IM Management
Ageeenents(MAs). Further,the goals of AIEO in National Water Program activities as well as AIEO related
oommitm u and moaners will appear in tier MAs. Spocimcamy,the Natioml Water Program will:
• Assist AIEO in its work with Tribes to develop Tribal-EPA Environmental Agcecoats that doscriU
a Tribes cr virmme tai problems,the Tribe's long-term vision for its cnwrommem and the near-term
steps that EPA and the Tribe will take to address priority problems;
` Work with Tribes to:
-increase water quality monitoring in Tribal watersheds;
-atrmgthm Tribal wotwshed rmrugeme nt programs;
-increase the oumbor of Tribes that have the pmtcdim of federally-approved water quality standards
for their waters;
eontime,resolving NPDES permit iuues oa Federal Indian reservations;
-with other Federal partners, etnsurc that Tribal public water systems provide safe drinking water,
• Involve all Assistant Admimstrators and Pi Tonal Administrators in the development ofthe AIEO
agenda and the dcoisiox on Indian onvironmenal issues in FY 1"7;
` Assurc AIEO ability to provide ema-media coordination with liadquancrs and Regions to build
Tribal capacity;and
` Support the Tribal Operations Committer.
10
v
chapter 1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1.1 INTRODUCTION
The 1994-95 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County's(Districts) Source Control Annual Report provides
the following:
• Information about the industrial source control program for the 1994-95 fiscal year(July 1,
1994-June 30, 1995) as required by the Districts' National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System(NPDES)permit issued by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board,Santa
Ana Region (CRWQCB) and the Environmental Protection Agency(EPA);and
• Information on howthe Districts'source control program is administered;howwell industrial
permittees achieve compliance at the source; what effect their discharge has had on the
Districts'influent,effluent,and biosolids;what labor,equipment,and capital resources were
used for industrial source control during the 1994-95 fiscal year,and to document how well
the program is achieving its goals.
During the 1994-95 fiscal year,the Districts'ocean wastewater discharge was in complete compliance with all
the NPDES permit limits for all constituents with the lone exception when the Districts exceeded the toxicity limit
in March 1995. More detailed information can be obtained in Chapter 4. Long-term trends of potentially toxic
pollutants,such as heavy metals,continue to show a steady decline (Figure 1.1).
2500 500
450
2000 —Total Heavy Metals —Flow 400
350
b 1500 300 M
I
d 250 G
a 1000 200 G
y 150
500 100
50
0 0
77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95
Figure 1.1 Average Effluent Total Heavy Metals and Flows for Nineteen Fiscal Years.
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California.
1.1
v
The Districts'source control program,which is the cornerstone of the Districts'overall environmental approach
to wastewater management has the following goals:
• To ensure that the quality of water discharged to the ocean is in compliance with the NPDES
permit requirements at all fimes.
• To prevent the pass-through of toxic chemicals to the ocean from industrial sources.
• To prevent interference with the Districts'operations and facilities.
• To prevent municipal biosolids contamination and provide for beneficial reuse options.
• To prevent exposure of Districts' employees to chemical hazards created by industrial
discharges.
• To prevent toxic contamination of the treated wastewater.
• To enforce Federal pretreatment standards.
• To ensure the equitable distribution of collection,treatment, and disposal costs to all users of
the system.
• To emphasize waste minimization and pollution prevention.
The Districts'federally-approved source control program consists of: 1) an industrial wastewater discharge
permit system to set industrial discharge limits and requirements; 2) a strong field-oriented sampling and
inspection effort; 3) effective enforcement procedures to deter violations and bring dischargers back into
compliance with requirements;and 4)a pollution prevention program that utilizes enforcement, permitting and
outreach elements to improve industrial pollution prevention.
Since fiscal 1976-77,the source control program has been successful in reducing the total mass of metals
entering the Dishicts'system by 81% and reducing the metals discharged to the marine environment by 90%.
Over this same time period,Influent cadmium has been reduced by 96%,chromium by 92%,copper by 74%,
lead by 92%, nickel by 77%, and zinc by 81%. Compared to the 1993-94 fiscal year,there has been a 6%
average increase of total daily influent metals entering the facilities and a 9%decrease in the effluent metals
discharged to the ocean. During the past five years that the Districts have operated under the administratively
extended 301(h)NPDES permit,the influent heavy metals have been reduced by 33% and the effluent by 39%.
There were no incidents of pass-through or interference during fiscal year 1994-95.
The reduction in lexica by the source control program has been so effective that for the last five years the
influent heavy metals to the Districts'treatment plants have met NPDES effluent standards even without benefit
of treatment. During the past five years,there has been a general downward trend in the discharge of toxic
organics. Forth's year,the monthly mean concentrations of effluent toxic organic pollutants met all of the 36
Marine Water Chronic Criteria established by the EPA.
The Districts' source control program not only has been effective In reducing the taxies discharged to the
sewerage system,but has also been effective in protecting the collection,treatment,and disposal facilities from
incidents of pass-through or interference, and in enabling the Districts to meet their NPDES ocean discharge
limits. The quality of the Districts'influent,effluent,and biosolids are testimony to how well the program has
progressed. Its future challenges will be to continue improving and meeting the program goals through the
promotion of pollution prevention,education,communication,and industrial and regulatory joint understanding
of sustainable growth and the consistent enforcement of the Districts' Wastewater Discharge Regulations
(Ordinance).
1.2
1.2 BACKGROUND
In the 1920's,a group of Orange County communities formed the Joint Outfall Sewer Organization (JOS)which
constructed and operated a screening plant, a pumping plant and an 800-foot outfall. These facilities were
expanded in the mid-1940's to include primary treatment at what is now the site of the Districts Reclamation
Plant No. 1 in Fountain Valley. Due to the statutory constraints and financing limitations,the JOS could no
longer meet the demands of the rapidly expanding county,and was subsequently dissolved and replaced by
the County Sanitation Districts(Districts)in 1947-48. A successful bond issue election in 1949 helped to finance
acquisition of the JOS's treatment and disposal facilities along with its property and a network of trunk sewers
in each of eight of the original Districts. Operation of the Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach treatment
plants by the Districts began in 1954. The present facilities consist of approximately 800 miles of subtrunk and
trunk sewers,26 raw sewage pumping stations,two wastewater treatment plants with a combined capacity of
294 million gallons per day,and two ocean outfalls.
Recognizing the need to control the quality and quantity of wastewaters discharged to the sewerage system,
the Districts' Boards of Directors adopted the first Ordinance regulating the use of the sewerage system in
February 1954. This Ordinance was subsequently revised and amended in February 1958,April 1970,July
1976,July 1983,September 1989,and February 7,1992. The 1970 revision formally established the Districts'
Industrial Waste Division(which is now called the Source Control Division)to issue permits,set flow and quality
limits, and monitor and inspect industrial discharges to the sewerage system. Substances monitored and
regulated included:oil and grease(08G) of mineral and petroleum origin,organic materials,dissolved solids,
suspended solids,phenolic compounds,radioactive wastes,combustible materials,and any other contaminants
which had the potential to degrade wastewater treatment processes or cause problems in the sewerage
facilities. In July 1976,the Ordinance was revised to include heavy metal limits.
In July 1983,the Ordinance was further amended to include enforcement of the EPA's Federal categorical
limits and to modify the Districts'local discharge limits for cadmium, copper,polychlorinated biphenyls(PCB),
pesticides,and total toxic organics(TTOs). The Districts'pretreatment program was approved by the EPA in
January 1984. In September 1989,the Ordinance was revised to streamline administrative and enforcement
procedures,to incorporate EPA regulations adopted since 1983,and to clarify the intent of the program through
added definitions and procedures. In February 1992,the Ordinance was again amended to revise defined
terms, inifiate non-compliance sampling fees, and include language giving the Districts authority to levy
administrative penalties in accordance with changes to state law enacted in January 1992.
1.3 PROGRAM SUMMARY
As of June 30,1995,the Districts were administering 947 permits,of which 420 were Class I permits,245 were
Class II permits, 228 were Class III permits, 37 were Wastehauler permits, and 17 were Special Purpose
permits. This permit inventory represents a decrease of 3%from the 977 permits administered during the
previous fiscal year. Of the 420 Class I users,266 were subject to federal Categorical Pretreatment Standards.
Over $6,009,756 in sewer use charge payments and approximately$292,554 in non-compliance fees and
penalties were invoiced through the industrial source control program.
Based on the 2,328 industrial inspections performed during the fiscal year, 5,104 samples collected, and
29,952laboratory analyses performed, approximately 11% of the sampled Class I industries were determined
to be in Significant Non-Compliance (SNC). Of the 266 categorical Class I users, 162 (61%) consistently
achieved compliance,63(24%)inconsistently achieved compliance,and 27(10%)were determined to be SNC.
There were 14(59%)categorical industries whose compliance status could not be determined. In 6 cases,there
was no industrial discharge during the routine sample and inspection visit, and the remaining 8 were recent
pernittees that were not sampled. Sampling is scheduled for these 14 companies beginning the first quarter
of fiscal year 1995-96.
1.3
1.4 SOURCE CONTROL PROGRAM COMPLIANCE WITH NATIONAL POLLUTANT
DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
This section is a summary of the pretreatment program requirements contained in the Districts' NPDES permit
jointly issued by the CRWQCB and EPA. The NPDES permit requirements are in two sections:the Final
Decision Fact Sheet and Order No.84-1 Waste Discharge Requirements. The requirements pertaining to the
source control program for 1994-95 are listed below(n bold typeset) using the appropriate numeration found
in the permit. Each requirement is followed by an overview of the activitiestactions which have resulted in the
Districts'compliance with the permit requirements. A reference is also given where additional information can
be found in this annual report.
1.4.1 Final Decision Fact Sheet
III. DESCRIPTION OF APPLICATION
SECTION F.Monitoring Program, Page 8
Assess the effectiveness of toxic control programs.
The mass of heavy metals in the Districts'influent has dramatically decreased. The 1994-95 fiscal
year's influent mass of heavy metals was 81%less than fiscal year 1976-77, 33% less than fiscal year
1990-91, and 6% more than last fiscal year. During the past five years, there has been a general
downward trend in the discharge of toxic organics. In 1994-95,the monthly mean concentrations of
effluent toxic organic pollutants met all of EPA's Marine Water Chronic Criteria.Chapter 5 graphically
illustrates the year-by-year influent and effluent reductions of heavy metals and the accompanying text
discusses the control of other toxics managed in the Districts'service area.
IV. SECTION 301(h)REQUIREMENTS
SECTION B. Final Decision,Page 10
2. The applicant shall revise its proposed schedule of activities to control nonindustrial
toxics.
The first four phases of the Non-Industrial Source Control (NISC) Program are complete. The NISC
activities are discussed in the Districts'Annual Reports,Chapter 7 of Volume 2 for 1985-86, 1986-87
and 1987-88,and in the NISC final report of January 1987. The Districts have worked in cooperation
with the County of Orange to establish permanent collection facilities for household hazardous waste.
1.4.2 Order No. 84-1
NPDES Waste Discharge Requirements
SECTION C.Provisions,Page 9
1. Upon the effective date of this order, the discharger shall implement fully its
pretreatment program. The discharger shall assure that industrial users of the
treatment works subject to pretreatment standards,promulgated by EPA or established
by the discharger,comply with those standards.
The Districts'industrial pretreatment program was approved by the EPA in January 1984 and includes
ongoing permitting,inspection,monitoring,and enforcement activities. The 1994-95 compliance status
1.4
for the Class I permittees is shown in the Monitoring and Compliance Status Report, presented in
Appendix A of this report.
2. Adequacy of any pretreatment program shall be determined by conformance with the
State Water Resources Control Board's (SWRCB) "Guidelines for Determining the
Effectiveness of Local Source Control Programs" and EPA regulations governing
pretreatment contained in 40 CFR 403.
As acknowledged by the EPA and SWRCB during the Pretreatment Compliance Inspections(PCis)
conducted in May 1987,June 1988,June 1989,September 1990,and June 1994;the Pretreatment
Performance Evaluations(PPEs) conducted In July 1989 and April 1991;and the Audit of May 1986,
the DWcW pretreatment program was found to be very effective in reducing the toxicants entering the
Districts'fadlrties and was found to be in conformance with the guidelines and requirements set forth
by SWCRB and EPA's regulations governing pretreatment programs contained in 40 CFR 403.
3. The discharger shall comply with the time schedule to achieve compliance with the
PCB limits in Effluent Limit A.1.c. The Plan of Study shall provide a strategy for
determining the location,quality,and quantity of PCB discharges to the wastewater
collection system.
The Districts expended over$400,000 between 1982-1985 in an effort to identify sources of PCB in
the service area. The effort to systematically look for sources of PCB began with the collection and
analysis of treatment plant influent and effluent samples. During the second quarter of 1903, a
four-phase program to identify and control point sources of PCB began and was completed In late
1985 without locating any discernible sources of PCB.
Phase I consisted of the initial gathering of PCB reference material. In Phase 11, this material was
reviewed and summarized. During Phase III,inspection and sampling of industries were conducted.
In Phase IV,trunkline wastewater and greaselsolids samples were collected and analyzed.
During Phase V of the project, the June 1986 PCB Source Control Program Final Report was
submitted. In Phase V, over 840 samples from the DstdcW sewer system were collected and
analyzed for PCB. The results indicated that there were no discernable sources of PCB discharged
to the Districts'system. The 1984 and 1985 Annual Reports contain a summary of the efforts made
during the reporting periods of July 1983 through June 1984, and July 1984 through June 1985,
respectively. In addition, the Districts' reports to the CRWQCB dated December 15, 1983,April 2,
1985, November 12, 1985,and March 26, 1986,give detailed results of the Districts'work.
The major conclusion of the Phase V study was that outside laboratory results showed considerably
less PCB than those reported by the Districts and that the results, in fact, showed the Districts'final
effluent to be in consistent compliance with Effluent Limit A.1.c.
Additional data have been reviewed since the Phase V study, and it has been concluded that the
Districts' effluent has been in compliance with the limits and the previous Districts' results were
incorrect.This explanation is presented in the 1987-88 Annual Report,Volume 2,Chapter 5,Section
5.7. During the last two fiscal years, PCB values in the influent and effluent were less than the
analytical detection limit.
S. In accordance with 40 CFR part 125.64(d),the discharger shall implement the approved
non-industrial source control program.
Since 1984,the Districts have spent$300,000 to develop and Implement the Non-Industrial Source
Control Program. This has included the dissemination of Information to the Orange County public,
participation In one-day events to collect household hazardous waste (roxic Round-Ups), and
1.5
1
sampling of nonindustrial shesto determine the impact on the Districts'system. Additionalinformation
can be found In Chapter 7 of the 1985-86,1986-87,1987-88, 1988-89,and 1989-90 Source Control
Annual Report and the January 1987 Non-Industrial Source Control Program Final Report. Permitted
household hazardous waste collection facilities opened in 1990 in the cities of Anaheim,Huntington
Beach,and San Juan Capistrano.
1.4.3 Standard Provisions and Reporting Requirements
A. General Provisions, Page 15
16. The discharger shall ensure compliance with any existing or future pretreatment
standard promulgated by EPA under Section 307 of the Clean Water Act or amendments
thereto for any discharge to the municipal system.
The ongoing quarterly Inspection, sampling, and monitoring program for each Class I Industry
(Significant Industrial Users) ensures compliance with Federal, state, and local regulations. The
compliance status of all industries subject to Federal Categorical Standards Is shown in the Monitoring
and Compliance Status Report,presented in Appendix A of this report.
18. The discharger shall require each Industrial user to submit periodic notice (over
intervals not to exceed nine months)of progress toward compliance with applicable
toxic and pretreatment standards developed underthe Clean Water Act or amendments
thereto. The discharger shall forward a copy of such notice to the Board and the
Regional Administrator.
As acknowledged and approved by the EPA,SWRCB,and the CRWQCB during the audits conducted
in May 1986, July 1989 and April 1991; and the PCIs in 1987, 1988, 1989, 1990, and 1994, the
Districts'permitting, monitoring,inspection,and enforcement efforts meet or exceed this requirement
for assessing a users progress toward compliance. The Quarterly Monitoring and Compliance Status
Reports on each Class I permittee are sent to the CRWQCB,SWRCB,and EPA. Those companies
that are not making sufficient progress toward compliance are directed by a Probation Order to perform
certain actions to bring the discharge into compliance. If the installation of a pretreatment system is
required,the company enters into an Enforcement Compliance Schedule Agreement(ECSA)which
requires specific schedules for installation of pretreatment equipment. If the company is not in
compliance with the ECSA,it is subject to additional enforcement actions such as a permit suspension,
permit revocation, administrative penalties, or civil actions such as injunctions, civil penalties, and
criminal penalties.
1.4.4 Order No. 84-1 Monitoring and Reporting Program
vll. Pretreatment Program Monitoring,Page 44
b. The discharger shall cause industrial users subject to Federal Categorical Standards
to achieve compliance no laterthan the date specified in those requirements,or,in the
case of a new industrial user, upon commencement of the discharge.
The Districts have an ongoing commitment to meeting the provisions of this requirement, and all
pretreatment requirements are rigorously enforced as discussed in Chapter 3 of this report. The
Ordinance contains specific provisions for new dischargers which are more stringent than those
required by 40 CFR 403.
C. The discharger shall perform the pretreatment functions as required in 40 CFR Part 403
including, but not limited to:
1.6
�q
(1) Implement the necessary legal authorities as provided in 40 CFR 403.8(f)(1);
The legal authorities are contained in the Disticts'July 1983"Regulations For Use of District Sewerage
Facilities" (Ordinance)which were approved by EPA in January 1984,and affirmed during the May
1986 audit. Revised Ordinances,"Wastewater Discharge Regulations",were adopted and became
effective September 8, 1989,and February 7, 1992. The adopted Ordinances were sent to EPA on
September 18.1989,and March 4, 1992.
(2) Enforce the pretreatment requirements under 40 CFR 403.5 and 403.6.
The requirements to enforce and implement National Pretreatment Standards for general prohibitions
and specific industrial subcategories are contained in the Districts'Ordinance. Chapter 3 of this report
describes the enforcement efforts for fiscal year 1994-95.
(3) Implement the programmatic functions as provided in 40 CFR 403.8(f)(2).
The required functions include the identification, quantification, permitting, and enforcement of the
standards set forth in the Districts'Ordinance. Chapters 2 and 3 of this report describe the permitting
and enforcement efforts for fiscal year 1994-95.
(4) Provide the requisite funding and personnel to implement the pretreatment program as
provided in 40 CFR 403.8(f)(3).
The Source Control Program is funded by industrial permit fees,non-compliance sampling fees,and
sewer use charges. The Source Control Division's operating expenditures, including laboratory
analyses for 1994-95 were over$2.8 million. Chapter 6 of this report provides additional details.
d. The discharger shall submit annually a report to EPA Region 9 and the State describing
the dischargers pretreatment activities over the previous twelve months.This annual
report is due on October 30 of each year and shall contain,but not be limited to,the
following information:
(1) A summary of analytical results from sampling of the constituents in the influent,
effluent,and sludge as specified in Monitoring and Reporting Program No.84-1.
The sampling summary is provided in Chapters 4, 5,and 9 and Appendix B of this report.
(2) Discussion of upset, interference, or pass-through incidents, it any, at the POTW
treatment plant which the discharger knows or suspects were caused by industrial
users of the POTIN system.
There were no plant upsets,interference, or pass-through incidents attributable to industrial users in
1994-5.
(3) The cumulative number of industrial users that the discharger has notified regarding
Baseline Monitoring Reports and the cumulative number of industrial user reports.
The Districts have on file all data necessary to originate Class I Pennittee Baseline Monitoring Reports.
As discussed with the EPA during the May 1986 industrial pretreatment program audit and the annual
Pretreatment Compliance Inspection(PCQ,the Districts'database on each company met or exceeded
the requirements for the information requested of dischargers for Baseline Monitoring Reports.
Information on each Class I discharger is updated through the permit renewal process.The summary
information is shown in the Monitoring and Compliance Status Report presented in Appendix A of this
report.
1.7
14) An updated list of the Dischargers industrial users including their names and
addresses. The list shall identify the industrial user subject to federal Categorical
Standards by specifying which set(s) of standards are applicable.
The updated list of industrial users is shown in the Monitoring and Compliance Status Report,
(presented in Appendix A) of this report.
The dischargershall characterize the compliance status of each industrial user by employing
the following description:
(A) In compliance with Baseline Monitoring Report requirements;
(B) Consistently achieving compliance;
(C) Inconsistently achieving compliance;
(D) Significantly violated applicable pretreatment requirements as defined by 40
CFR 403.81
(E) On a compliance schedule to achieve compliance (include the date that final
compliance is required);
(F) Achieving compliance and not on a compliance schedule;
(G) The discharger does not know the industrial user's compliance status.
A report describing the compliance status of any industrial user characterized by the
descriptions in items 4(C) through (G) above shall be submitted quarterly from the annual
report date to EPA Region IX and the State. The report shall identify the specific compliance
status of each such industrial user.
The Quarterly Monitoring and Compliance Status Reports were submitted for fiscal year 1994-
95 on November 30, 1994, February 28, 1995, May 30, 1995, and August 30, 1995. The
Quarterly Monitoring and Compliance Status Report and the Semiannual Compliance Status
presented In Appendix A of this report define whether a company is consistently achieving
compliance (CAC), Inconsistently achieving compliance (IAC) or is in significant
noncompliance (SNC). During 1994-95, 281 of 402 sampled Class I permittees (or 70%)
were CAC; 77 sampled Class I permittees (or 19%) were IAC; and 44 sampled Class I
permittees (or 11%) were SNC. A compliance determination could not be made for 18
industries because 9 permittees were not discharging industrial waste at the times of
inspection,and 9 were recently permitted facilities.
(5) A summary of the inspection and sampling activities conducted by the discharger
during the past year to gather information and data regarding industrial users. The
summary shall include:
(A) The names and addresses of the Industrial users subject to surveillance by the
discharger and an explanation of whether they were inspected, sampled, or
both and the frequency of these activities at each user; and
(B) The conclusions and results fromthe inspection or sampling of each industrial
user.
1.8
�y
The Monitoring and Compliance Status Report (Appendix A of this report) includes the
information requested in items(A) and (B)above. Class I permittees sample data (Appendix
G of this report) show individual heavy metal, total toxic organic, cyanide, and other
miscellaneous sample analyses. A further discussion of the Districts' 2,328 inspections
conducted and 5,104 samples collected for fiscal year 199"5 is presented in Chapter 3 of
this report.
(6) Summary of the compliance/enforcement activities during the past year. The summary
shall include the names and addresses of the industrial users affected by the following
actions:
(A) Warning letters or notices of violation regarding the industrial users'apparent
noncompliance with federal Categorical Standards or local discharge limits.For
each industrial user, identify whether the apparent violation concerned the
federal Categorical Standards or local discharge limits;
Appendix D, Outgoing Correspondence Log, lists the Notices of Violation that were sent in
1994-95. These notices state that the company was in non-compliance and must take
corrective actions to immediately achieve compliance. A summary of non-compliance
violations is presented in the Monitoring and Compliance Status Report(Appendix A). A listing
by company of the non-compliance fees collected in 1994-95 is presented in Appendix E.
(B) Administrative Orders regarding the industrial users noncompliance with
federal Categorical Standards or local discharge limits. For each industrial
user, identify whether the violation concerned the federal Categorical
Standards or local discharge limits.
Four of the Class I pennitiees were subject to probation Orders during fiscal year 1994-95
which required the companies to achieve compliance within a prescribed time. Enforcement
details can be found in Chapter 3 of the report.
(C) Civil actions regarding the industrial users' noncompliance with federal
Categorical Standards or local discharge limits. For each industrial user,
Identify whether the violation concerned the federal Categorical Standards or
local discharge limits.
There were no civil actions taken during fiscal year 1994-95.
(D) Criminal actions regarding the industrial users' noncompliance with federal
Categorical Standards or local discharge limits. For each industrial user,
identify whether the violation concerned the federal Categorical Standards or
local discharge limits.
No criminal action suits were filed in 1994-95.
(E) Assessment of monetary penalties. For each industrial user, identify the
amount of the penalties;
One hundred and four companies were invoiced for a total of$292,554 in non-compliance
fees and penalties. The company names and specific dollar amounts are shown in Appendix
E of the report.
1.9
a
(F) Restriction of flow to the POTW;or
There were no mandated restrictions of industrial flows from specific dischargers during 1994-
95.
(G) Disconnection from discharge to the POTW.
There were no physical disconnections from the sewer in 1994-95.
(7) A description of any significant changes in operating the pretreatment program which
differfrom the information in the discharger's Approved POTW Pretreatment Program
including, but not limited to changes concerning: the program's administrative
structure; local industrial discharge limits; monitoring program or monitoring
frequencies; legal authority or enforcement policy; funding mechanisms; resource
requirements; or staffing levels.
For fiscal year 1994-95,there were no significant changes in operating the pretreatment program.
In past years,the primary changes to the pretreatment program were in the form of revisions to the
Wastewater Discharge Regulations. During the 1991-92 fiscal year, there were nonsubstantial
changes in the form of revisions to defined terms,non-compliance sampling fees,and incorporation
of language giving the Districts authority to levy administrative penalties in accordance with state law.
The amended Regulations were authorized by the Boards of Directors in February 1992.
(8) A summary of the annual pretreatment budget, including the cost of pretreatment
program functions and equipment purchases.
For fiscal year 1994-95,the operating expenses for the source control program were approximately
$2,836,003. Additional information on the source control budget,costs,and purchases are shown in
Chapter 6 of this report.
(9) A summary of public participation activities to involve and inform the public.
Therewere over 67 public participation events held with various groups in this fiscal year. A complete
summary of the public participation activities and communication with other public agencies is shown
in Chapter 7 of the report.
(10) Other miscellaneous pretreatment developments, including treatment facilities
changes, changes in sludge disposal methods, receiving water quality, data
management,and concerns not described elsewhere in the report.
Additional information on operational modifications and compliance with NPDES permit conditions and
ocean monitoring requirements is given in Chapters 4 and 5 of this report.
1.10
U
CELLULAR TELEPHONE POLICY AND PROCEDURE
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
A. PURPOSE
To establish the criteria for deployment of Districts-provided cellular telephone
equipment to employees and the procedures regulating the use of same.
B. SCOPE
All regular employees.
C. POLICY
1. Basic Principles. The Districts will provide all employees with the
appropriate communication tools to enable them to effectively perform
their job. The basic telephone is the most common tool. When portable
means of communication are required, the Districts' 2-way radio system is
a valuable resource. When necessary, a cellular telephone and
appropriate peripheral equipment may be necessary for employees with a
documented need. In every instance where the Districts provide the
communication tool, it is the employee's responsibility to ensure that the
device is used for appropriate Districts business.
2. Justification. The basic criteria which must be met to justify need for a
cellular telephone must fall in one or more of the following three
categories:
(a) Safety / Emergency Response. The employee's duties involve
monitoring, response, or other activities which are essential to the
safe operation of the Districts' facilities, making mobile
communication with a cellular telephone necessary.
(b) On-Call. The employee's job assignment involves being on-call,
either on a formal assignment basis or as an inherent level of
responsibility based on the responsibilities of the position.
(c) Field Work. The employee's normal work duties involve the need to
communicate in the field with non-Districts' employees. Typically
this will involve working in locations where no public telephone is
reasonably available or practical.
A memo of justification from the requesting employee must be attached to
the Purchase Requisition when the request is submitted to the employee's
supervisor for approval. The signature of each level of supervision
required by the Purchase Requisition process means that the signer
concurs with the justification. All request for cellular telephones require
a
Department Head approval.
3. If the employee cannot adequately justify the expenditure of Districts
funds to provide the employee with a cellular telephone, the employee is
free to purchase his/her own telephone. If the employee uses his/her own
cellular telephone for Districts business, the employee may then submit a
photocopy of their bill for reimbursement. Charges will be reimbursed for
air time plus the cost of each call made for legitimate Districts business.
The employee's supervisor must approve these requests and the calls
documented.
4. All cellular telephone bills will be subject to an initial screening for
reasonable limits by the Accounting Division. In addition to the employee's
review as mentioned in item 5 (a. iii) below, all bills must be reviewed by
the employee's supervisor.
5. Each employee with a Districts-provided cellular telephone must agree to
the following procedures regarding use and handling:
a. The Accounting Division will send a copy of the telephone bill to
each individual cellular telephone user each month.
(i) Each employee is responsible to review the bill in a timely
manner and note any personal calls made. A check must be
made payable to the Districts for the total of these calls and
returned with the bill to the Accounting Division.
(ii) Each employee is responsible to review the bill for calls not
made. Any calls which cannot be accounted for as having
been made for either Districts business or personal use
should be noted. It is the employee's responsibility to
contact the cellular telephone service provider listed on the
bill to have the charges reversed and make arrangements to
take remedial action to prevent further fraudulent calls.
(iii) All bills must be submitted to the employee's supervisor for
review.
(iv) If the employee uses the cellular telephone during out-of-
town travel on Districts business, personal calls made with a
Districts cellular telephone will be allowed only up to the
daily dollar limit as defined in the Travel and Meeting
Authorization Form.
b. Fraudulent calls are often made on cellular telephones without the
ti
knowledge of the cellular telephone user. A Fraud Protection
Feature must be encoded into each cellular telephone to prevent
this. However, to work, the cellular telephone user must utilize the
proper keystrokes on the cellular telephone before and after
cellular telephone use. Training on the use of these keystrokes is
given at the time the cellular telephone is programmed and
delivered to the user. The employee is responsible to use proper
care to follow the procedures given at the time the telephone is
obtained to prevent cellular telephone fraud.
C. The Districts-provided cellular telephone may not be loaned or
assigned to a non-employee.
d. Employees with Districts-provided cellular telephones are
responsible for maintaining adequate physical protection of the
cellular telephone. This protection includes, but is not limited to,
never leaving cellular telephones unattended in public areas and
never leaving cellular telephones in plain sight, either in hotel
rooms or automobiles.
e. Employees with Districts-provided cellular telephones must report
any problems with their telephones promptly. Contact the
Hardware Support Division of the Information Technology
Department.
... (fiang"Osiltual Itriarb
United StatesPROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 104'h CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
of Americaiu
WASHINGTON, TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1"5
House of Representatives
RECOGNITION OF AMSA ON THE OCCASION
OF ITS 25TH ANNIVERSARY
HON. BUD SHUSTER treatment works, they formed AMSA.
OF PENNSYLVANIA In the quarter century that followed, the
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES association grew and its interests diversified.
Tuesday, November 7, 1995 Today, AMSA is a dynamic national organi-
Mr. SHUSTER. Mr. Speaker, on behalf zation involved in all facets of water quality
of myself and JIM OBERSTAR, the ranking protection and representing over 160 muni-
Democrat of the Transportation and Infras- cipalities. Viewed as a key stakeholder in
tructure Committee, I wish to take this op- both the legislative and regulatory arenas,
portunity to congratulate the Association of AMSA has built credible and collaborative
Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies (AMSA) relationships with Members of Congress,
on the occasion of its 25th anniversary. Presidential administrations and the Environ-
AMSA is the only national trade association mental Protection Agency. Recent years
exclusively representing the unique interests have reflected heightened involvement for
of our country's largest wastewater treat- the association in a broadening array of en-
ment agencies. As the first line of defense vironmental laws and regulations, including
in our national campaign against water pol- the gamut of ecosystem issues encom-
lution, AMSA members are responsible for passed under the umbrella of watershed
the high degree of water quality that we now management, among them, nonpoint source
enjoy in the United States. pollution control and the protection of air
The emergence of AMSA as a national- quality and endangered species. As chair-
ly recognized leader in environmental policy man of the Transportation and Infrastructure
and a sought-after technical resource on Committee, I am in a good position to ob-
water quality and ecosystem protection is- serve that AMSA has met the goal of its
sues has paralleled the maturation of the Na- founders and continues to pursue every op-
tion's most successful environmental portunity to develop and implement scien-
law—the Clean Water Act. AMSA was es- tifically based, technically sound and
tablished in 1970 by representatives of 22 cost-effective environmental programs.
municipal sewage agencies to secure Fed- AMSA's active membership, prominence
eral funding for municipal wastewater treat- as a nationally recognized leader in environ-
ment and serve as a forum to discuss mental policy, and it close working relation-
emerging national interest in improving the ship with Congress and EPA, will
quality of the Nation's waters. Based upon undoubtedly allow it to help shape the
the shared goal of effectively representing course of environmental protection into the
the interests and priorities of publicly owned next century.
M AW% 14:36:22 -> 714962M356 Donald McIntyre Page H01
FEB-07-96 WED 13:36 P. 01
� CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION of SANITATION AGENCIES
925 L Sarm4 Suttc 1400 Baca .W,CA 95614 TEL(01G)44G-03M-FAX(91G)448 4806
corm"°
DATE: February 7, 1996
TO: CASA Member Agencies
PROM: Mike Dillon, Executive Director
Rpberta Larson, Director of Regulatory Affairs
Eric Sapirstein, Federal Legislative Advocate
SUBJECT: CONSTITUTION REVISION COMMISSION AND PRIVATIZATION
1. CONSTITUTION REVISION COMMISSION HOME RULE CHARTER
PROPOSAL GENERATES LENGTHY DEBATE
In a surprising move last week, Assembly Speaker Curt Pringle, removed four
of former Democratic Speaker Willie Brown's appointments to the Constitution
Revision Commission, and named four new replacements. The new appointees are Dr.
Larry Arnn, president of the Claremont Institute and co-chair of the California Civil
Rights Initiative campaign; Dr. Steven Frat4:s, second Vice President of the Girl Scouts
of San Diego and Imperial Counties; Dr. Edward Erler, professor of political science at
CSU, San Bernardino and member of the California Advisory Commission on Civil
Rights, and Richard Rider, retired stockbroker, financial planner and 1994 Libertarian
candidate for Governor. The four new appointees replace former Commissioners
Elizabeth Cabtaser, Kamala Harris, Assemblyman Phil Isenberg, and Dr_ Chui Tsang.
The new appointees got to flex their muscles during a two-day meeting on
Monday and Tuesday, when the California Constitution Revision Commission debated
the merits of the Home Rule Community Charter proposal, which would require local
governments in each county to draft a countywide charter for submittal to the voters.
The Commission had hoped to finalize its recommendations by late Tuesday afternoon,
but the preliminary vote to determine if the controversial charter proposal was even
"on the right track" was 10 to 7, with three of the four newly-appointed
Commissioners joining Senator Bill Leonard, Legislative Analyst Liz Hill, Dr. Akan
Heslop and Andy Baron in voting against the charter component. Debate centered on
many of the issues raised by the special district associations, in a joint letter to the
Commission, regarding its "cookie cutter" approach.
Some Commissioners questioned the arbitrary nature of the mandate to reduce the
number of governmental units by 10 percent, suggesting that the plan should take
into account the relative number of local government units that already exist New
appointee Stev4v Frates stressed that the focus should be on improved efficiency, not
arbitrary numeric reductions in agencies. Others expressed concern that the latest
M7107196 14:37:03 -> 714962O356 Donald McIntyre Page 1102
FEB-07-96 WED 13:36 P. 02
version of the local charter proposal constitutes a significant unfunded state mandate.
The Commission also debated the composition of the proposed county charter
Commissions (CCCs), which are heavily weighted toward cities and counties at the
expense of schools and special districts.
Given the controversy surrounding the local charter concept and the sheer magnitude
of its unresolved issues, the Commission has decided to convene another mating on
February 22 to further refine its recommendations. Other issues still pending are
education finance, budget reserve requirements and legislative fundraising while in
session. In the meantime, CSA and the other special district organizations will
continue to work with Commissioners on revising the charter concept
n. REASON FOUNDATION RELEASES REPORT ON PRIVATIZATION
The Reason Foundation, a private research group based in Los Angeles, has released a
report on privatizing the water industry. The report, titled 'Restructuring Amrrica s
Water Industry: Comparing Investor-Owned and Government Water Systems" has
been sharply criticized within the water industry, including the Association of
California Water Agencies (ACWA). The report concludes that privately-owned
companies are far more efficient in supplying water than are publicly-owned agencies.
In conducting their research, the authors reportedly gathered information on
wastewater treatment operations as well. This information is not mentioned in the
report, but could form the basis for a similar report in the future. Given the
discussion regarding privatization at last month's CASA meeting and the importance
of the issue, we wanted to share the conclusions of the Reason Foundation report with
you.
The report compares the operations of five publicly-owned water supply ageucies in
Contra Costa and Alameda counties with three investor-owned water suppliers to
determine the benefits of restructuring the industry to increase efficiency. The
authors suggest that inefficiencies in providing water supply and wastewater treatment
services arise from the "balkanization" of authority in providing these services. The
authors state that this was a key motivating factor in the restructuring of the British
water system; in fad, the report begins with the premise that England and France,
which have privatized water supply service to a large degree have benelitted
dramatically in terms of both operating efficiency and water quality. The report
concedes, however, that no comprehensive study comparing compliance with water
quality standards between public and private water purveyors in California has been
conducted.
The authors recommend that public involvement in water supply be reconsidered,
"since investor-owned companies can provide this same function at the same cost
without subsidies or tax-exemptions." However, in reaching this conclusion, the
report fails to note that most of the private companies are cagaged in distribution
only, while the public agencies are responsible for treatment and storage as well; in
other words, the report compares apples and oranges.
I
AGENDA
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708
REGULAR MEETING
FEBRUARY 28, 1996 - 7:30 P.M.
In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this
agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the Districts' Administrative Offices not less I
1 than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to
each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary.
In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Boards
for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an
emergency item or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the
j attention of the Districts subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a I
! supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. I
i €
(1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation
(2) Roll call
(3) Appointment of Chair pro tem, if necessary
(4) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies
relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders)
(5) Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Boards on specific agenda
items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by
the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion
and remarks may be limited to five minutes.
Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this
agenda cannot have action taken by the Boards of Directors except as
authorized by Section 54954.2(b).
02/28/96
(6) The Joint Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports
on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are
for information only and require no action by the Directors.
(a) Report of Joint Chair, consideration of Resolutions or commendations,
presentations and awards
(b) Report of General Manager
(c) Report of General Counsel
(7) EACH DISTRICT
If no corrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will be deemed
approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair:
District 1 - January 24, 1996 regular, January 27, 1996 adjourned, and
February 14, 1996 adjourned
District 2 - January 24, 1996 regular, January 27, 1996 adjourned, and
February 14, 1996 adjourned
District 3 - January 24, 1996 regular, January 27, 1996 adjourned, and
February 14, 1996 adjourned
District 5 - January 24, 1996 regular, January 27, 1996 adjourned, and
February 14, 1996 adjourned
District 6 - January 24, 1996 regular, January 27, 1996 adjourned, and
February 14, 1996 adjourned
District 7 - January 24, 1996 regular, January 27, 1996 adjourned, and
February 14, 1996 adjourned
District 11 - January 24, 1996 regular, and February 14, 1996 adjourned
District 13 - January 24, 1996 regular, January 27, 1996 adjourned, and
February 14, 1996 adjourned
District 14 - January 24, 1996 regular, January 27, 1996 adjourned, and
February 14, 1996 adjourned
-2-
02/28/96
(8) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and
individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that
vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director
expresses a desire to vote differently for any District.)
01/24/96 01/30/96 02/07/96
ALL DISTRICTS
Joint Operating Fund - $ 330,891.89 $ 1,984.69 $1,097,537.60
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 716,314.33 100.00 377,866.63
Joint Working Capital Fund - 508,946.57 183,218.02
Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 3,511.49 8,582.81 63,272.44
DISTRICT NO. 1 - 92.60 443.50
DISTRICT NO. 2 - 1,305.61 5,033.49
DISTRICT NO. 3 - 500,455.26 423,815.28
DISTRICT NO. 5 - 477.07 12,802.61
DISTRICT NO. 6 - 69.20 252.84
DISTRICT NO. 7 - 312,689.59 62,188.89
DISTRICT NO. 11 - 10,463.03 195,154.05
DISTRICT NO. 13 - 3.40 0.00
DISTRICT NO. 14 - 764.81 17.05
DISTRICTS NOS. 3 & 11 JOINT - 875.00 0.00
DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 678.04 172,537.30
DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 213.30 2,258.68
DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 15.98 6,341.96
$2,387,767.17 11g.EL67.50 12.602.740.34
-3-
02/28/96
(9) CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 9(a) THROUGH 9(d)
i All matters placed on the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or
further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the
consent calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there
will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be
enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for
resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent j
i calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. i
I
i Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon
recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be
removed from the consent calendar.
I The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar.
Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent
calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows:
ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Consideration of Resolution No. 96-17, receiving and filing bid tabulation
and recommendation and awarding contract for Purchase of Muriatic Acid,
Specification No. C-037, to Pressure Vessel Service, Inc., for the delivered
price of$.46 per gallon, plus sales tax, for a one-year period beginning
April 10, 1996, with provision for four one-year extensions (Estimated
annual cost $59,800.00 plus sales tax).
(b) Consideration of Resolution No. 96-18, approving Amendment No. 1 to
the Professional Services Agreement with Clifford A. Forkert Civil
Engineers for Surveying Services for Various Collection System and
Treatment Plant Projects, Specification No. P-150, providing for a name
change to Forkert Engineering & Surveying, Inc.
DISTRICT 2
(c) Consideration of Resolution No. 96-22-2, approving Agreement with the
Orange County Flood Control District, providing for reimbursement of
costs to the Flood Control District re installation of flood protection on
South River Trunk as part of the Santa Ana River Flood Improvements, in
an amount not to exceed $50,000.00
-4-
[ITEM (9) CONTINUED ON PAGE 5]
02/28/96
(9) DISTRICT 5 - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued)
(d) Consideration of motion to'receive and file Summons & Complaint for -
Inverse Condemnation, Charles G. Reynolds, at al., vs. City of Newport
Beach, at al., Superior Court Case No. 758245, for alleged damages to
homes due to surface run off because of a ruptured sewer line adjacent to
plaintiffs' homes, and authorize District's General Counsel to appear and
defend the interests of the District.
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
(10) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any
-5-
02/28/96
NON-CONSENT CALENDAR
(11) ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Committee Minutes:
(1) Receive and file draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting
held on January 24, 1996.
(2) Receive and file draft Planning, Design, and Construction
Committee Minutes for the meeting held on February 1, 1996.
(3) Receive and file draft Operations, Maintenance, and Technical
Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on February 7,
1996.
(4) Receive and file draft Finance, Administration, and Human
Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on
February 14, 1996.
(7) Receive and file draft Executive Committee Minutes for the meeting
held on February 21, 1996.
(b) Consideration of the following actions recommended by said committees:
• Verbal Report from Chair of Planning, Design and Construction Committee
re: February 1, 1996 Meeting.
(1) PDC95-34 Consideration of the following actions relative to
Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-35-3; Process
Area Fire Protection, Signage and Water Distribution System
Modifications at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-5; Process Area Fire
Protection, Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at
Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-46; and, Chemical and Plant Water Facility
Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-55:
(a) Verbal report of Director of Engineering
(b) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the
plans and specifications for said project, changing the date
for receipt of bids from January 9, 1996 to January 16, 1996,
clarifying contractor's license requirements, and making
miscellaneous technical clarifications.
(c) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 2 to the
plans and specifications for said project, making
miscellaneous technical clarifications.
[ITEM (11)(b) CONTINUED ON PAGE 7]
02/28/96
(11) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 6)
(b) (1) (d) Consideration of Resolution No. 96-19, receiving and filing -
bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract
for Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-35-3;
Process Area Fire Protection, Signage and Water
Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 1, Job
No. P1-38-5; Process Area Fire Protection, Signage and
Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job
No. P246; and, Chemical and Plant Water Facility
Modifications at Plant No. 2, Jab No. P2-55, to Sverdrup
Civil, Inc., in the total corrected amount of$13,196,500.00.
• Verbal Report from Chair of Operations, Maintenance and Technical
Services Committee re: February 7, 1996 Meeting.
(2) Consideration of the following motions relative to a Heavy Duty
Vehicle Demonstration Project with South Coast Air Quality
Management District (SCAQMD):
(a) OMTS95-041 a Consideration of motion authorizing the
General Manager to enter into an agreement with SCAQMD
re said project, at no cost to the Districts, in form approved
by General Counsel.
(b) OMTS95-041 b Consideration of motion authorizing the
General Manager to enter into a Memorandum of
Understanding with SCAQMD re said project, in form
approved by General Counsel.
• Verbal Report from Chair of Finance, Administrative and Human Resources
Committee re: February 14, 1996 Meeting.
(3) FAHR96-04 Consideration of Resolution No. 96-20, amending
Resolution No. 95-105, extending benefit coverage for regular
employees working a reduced work week.
(4) FAHR96-10 Consideration of motion approving renewal of Boiler &
Machinery Insurance for a one-year period effective March 1, 1996
to March 1, 1997, with American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance
(Kemper Insurance Group), in an amount not to exceed
$79,698.00.
(5) FAHR96-14 Consideration of motion to receive and file Treasurer's
Report for the month of December 1995.
[ITEM (11)(b) CONTINUED ON PAGE 8]
-7-
02/28/96
(11) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 7)
(6) FAHR96-15 Consideration of motion to receive and file Mid-Year
Financial and Operations Report dated December 31, 1995
(Presentation by Controller).
(7) FAHR96-17 Consideration of motion to approve 1996-97 Budget
Assumptions for use in preparation of Districts' 1996-97 Budget
(Presentation by Controller).
• Verbal Report from Chair of Executive Committee re: February 21, 1996
Meeting.
(12) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Report dated February 22, 1996,
requesting staff be authorized to place a moratorium on the determination and
collection of excess capacity charges until such time that a study for capital
charges is completed and a method to collect capital charges is adopted by the
Boards of Directors, and to guarantee the capital charge for industrial users,
which connect to the system or increase their discharge prior to completion of the
study, will be no higher than those specified in said Staff Report. Said
moratorium will not apply to dischargers which enter into separate discharge
agreements with the Districts.
(13) ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Update concerning developments related to the County's Commingled
Investment Pool.
(b) FAHR96-09 Consideration of motion to receive and file staff report dated
February 5, 1996 re the Joint Agreement of the County of Orange, the
Official Investment Pool Participants' Committee, and Each Option A Pool;
and consideration of Resolution No. 96-21, approving said agreement.
(14) ALL DISTRICTS
Update re proposed acquisition of County Landfill System
-8-
02/28/96
(15) ALL DISTRICTS
..........................._......................_..................................................................................._...._............._......._........
i CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on
I this agenda as a regular meeting of the Boards,the Chair may convene the I
I Boards in closed session to consider matters of pending real estate
negotiations, pending or potential litigation,or personnel matters, pursuant to i
iGovernment Code Sections 54956.8, 54956.9,54957 or 54957.6, as noted.
Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of I
I pending or potential litigation; (c) employment actions or negotiations with {
i employee representatives;or which are exempt from public disclosure under
the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Boards during a
permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such
time as final actions are taken by the Boards on any of these subjects,the
minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information.
(a) Convene in closed session, if necessary
(b) (1) Confer with Special Counsel and General Counsel re status of
litigation, Patterson v. County Sanitation Districts of Orange
County, Orange County Superior Court Case Nos. 738179, 738622
and 741371 (Government Code Section 54956.9(a).
(2) Confer with General Counsel re status of litigation, S. Serrantino v.
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Orange County
Superior Court Case No. 737044 (Government Code
Section 54956.9(a).
(c) Reconvene in regular session
(d) Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session
(16) ALL DISTRICTS
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(17) ALL DISTRICTS
Matters which a Director would like staff to report on at a subsequent meeting
(18) ALL DISTRICTS
Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and
staff report
(19) DISTRICT 1
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
-9-
02/28/96
(20) DISTRICT 1 '
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(21) DISTRICT
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(22) DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(23) DISTRICT 3
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(24) DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(25) DISTRICTS 5 & 6
Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and
specification for Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3,
Contract No. 5-37-3, authorizing an addition of $232,610.00 to the contract with
Wal-Con Construction Company, for six items of additional work, and granting a
time extension of 60 calendar days for completion of said additional work.
(26) DISTRICT 5
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(27) DISTRICT 5
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(28) DISTRICT 6
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(29) DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(30) DISTRICT 7
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(31) DISTRICT
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(32) DISTRICT 11
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(33) DISTRICT 11
Consideration of motion to adjourn
-10-
02/28/96
(34) DISTRICT 13
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(35) DISTRICT 13
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(36) DISTRICT 14
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(37) DISTRICT 14
Consideration of motion to adjourn
` NOTICE TO DIRECTORS To place.items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the —'
Joint Boards, Directors shall submit items to the Board Secretary not later than the close of 3
j business 14 days preceding the Joint Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on
I the agenda all items submitted by Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and
all formal communications. i
Board Secretary: Penny Kyle (714) 962-2411, ext. 2026
I Secretary: Patricia L. Jonk (714) 962-2411, ext. 2029
Secretary: Janet L. Gray (714) 962-2411, ext. 2027
J 3W PDOCISSAG96TED96A 02
COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14
OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
MINUTES
JOINT BOARD MEETING
JANUARY 24, 1996
TRICTS Of p99y
yQ2 `� no
G
Z �
C3
u a
vwv
A CAS C�7 1
90rFcl/NT E
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018
ROLL CALL
A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,2, 3. 5. 6,
7, 71, 13 and 14 of Orange County,California,was held on January,24, 1996, at 7:30 p.m.,in the
Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was imbed
and the Secretary,reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2,3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13,and 14 as
follows:
ACTNE ALTERNATE `
DIRECTORS DIRECTORS
DISTRICT NO. 1: x Pal McGuigan, Chair Ted R.Moreno
James M.Fanyman,Chair pro tam g Arlene Schafer
x Mark A.Murphy Joanne County
Thomas R.Betrayal Jim from
x Roger Stanton Wibiam G.Steiner
DISTRICT NO.2: 3 John ColsDI,Chair George Scon
_ Daniel T.Watch.Clear po tam Jahn M.Gielixeon
• Barry Danes Bob Bell
• Burnie Dunlap Glenn Parker
• Norman Z.Ecksmode Carol Downey
James H.Flom Steve Anderson
_ x Pat McGuigan Ted R.Moreno
Mark A.Murphy Joanne Cooley
Chris Nprb, x Don Bankhead
Sheldon Singer _ George L Maker
Roger Stanton _ erosion G. Steiner
Bob Zoned _ Tom Daly
DISTRICT NO.3: x Sal A.Skills,Chair Harry M.Wn.
y Burnie Dunlap,Chair pro ten Glenn Parker
x Walter Bowman Gail Kerry
George Grown Marilyn Bruce Hastings
Jahn Collins George Boon
* James H.Flan Steve Anderson
$ Don R.Griffin Patsy Marshall
Victor Leiprig Ralph Bauer
x Wally Om Eva G.Miner
A Pat McGuigan Ted R.Moreno
Chris Norby Don Bankhead
Margie L.Rice James V.Evans
Sheldon Singer George L.Direst
x Roger Stanton evident G.Steiner
g Charles SyNn Rpban WaMstrom
x Bob Zemel Tom Dal,
DISTRICT NO.5: �_ Jan Debby,Chair John C.Cos.Jr.
Wiliam G.Steins,Chair pm rem _ Roger Stanton
Jots C.Cox,Jr. _ Jan Debby
DISTRICT NO.6: James M.Ferrymen,Chair g All"Schafer
Jan Debby,Chair Wo tam _ Jem C.Co.,Jr.
y Wllien G. Smelter _ Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO.7: Barry Hammond,Chair _ Mike Ward
Thomas R. Saltarelli,Chair pro tam _ Jim Potts
Jan Debay John C.Cox.Jr.
James M.Ferryman Arena Scheme
Pat McGuigan TO R.Moreno
Mark A.Murphy Jeanne Coon
William G.Steiner Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO.11: g Victor Losing.Chair _ Ralph Bauer
g Share, Dettloff, Chair pro tern _ Ralph Baba
x Roger Stanton Witham G.Steiner
DISTRICT NO.13: John M.Gullisson.Chair Daniel T.Welch
Bob Zombi,Chair pro tam Tom Daly
JL� Bunie Dunlap Glenn Parker
Mark A.Murphy Joanne Cistern
William G. Steiner Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO.14: Thomas R.Bluntness,Chair _ Jim Pont
g Mark A.Murphy, Chair pro tam _ Joanne Cpomr
Barry Hammond _ Mike Want
_JL William G.Steiner _ Roger Stanton
Peer A.Swan _ Darryl Miller
.2-
1/24/96
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Don McIntyre, General Manager, Blake P. Anderson,-
Assistant General Manager-Operations, Judith A.
Wilson, Assistant General Manager-Administration,
Penny Kyle, Board Secretary, Mark Esquer, John Finias,
Janet Gray, Gary Hasenstab, Irvin Haydock, Ed
Hodges, Steve Hovey, Patricia Jonk, Terri Jos*ay,
Steve Kozak, John Linder, David Ludwin, Greg
Mathews, Pat McNelly, Bob Ooten, Mike Peterman,
Gary Streed, Michelle Tuchman, Dan Tunnicliff, Nancy
Wheatley, Paula Zeller
OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Bill Butler, Bill
Knopf, Phil Stone, George Zlaket, Alternate Director
DISTRICTS 2.3.13 & 14
Receive and file minute excerpts re Board aopointments
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the minute excerpts from the following re election of mayors, appointments of
alternate Directors, and seating new members of the Boards, be, and are hereby,
received and ordered filed, as follows: ('Mayor)
City/Aoencv District Active Director Alternate Director
Buena Park 3 Don R. Griffin Patsy Marshall'
Brea 2,3 & 13 Bumie Dunlap- Glenn Parker
Fountain Valley 2 & 3 John Collins George Scott'
Fullerton 2 & 3 Chris Norby' Don Bankhead
La Habra 2 & 3 James H. Flora Steve Anderson'
Los Alamitos 3 Charles E. Sylvia Robert Wahlstrom'
Placentia 2 Norman Z. Eckenrode Carol Downey'
Stanton 3 Sal A. Sapien Harry M. Dotson
Yorba Linda 2 Daniel T. Welch John M. Gullixson'
13 John M. Gullixson' Daniel T. Welch
Midway City 3 Margie L. Rice James V. Evans
Sanitary District
Irvine Ranch 14 Peer A. Swan Darryl G. Miller
Water District
-3-
1/24196
DISTRICTS 3 & 11
Receive. file. and accept resignation of
Mayor Dave Sullivan of the City of
Huntington Beach and seatino first and
second alternates to the Mayor
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the letter from Mayor Dave Sullivan of the City of Huntington Beach resigning
from the Boards of Directors of District Nos. 3 and 11, be, and is hereby, received and
ordered filed; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the following first and second alternates to the mayor be
seated as members of the Boards:
District Active Director Alternate Director
3 & 11 Victor Leipzig Ralph Bauer
11 Shirley Dettloff Ralph Bauer
DISTRICT 3
Receive, file, and accept resignation of
Mayor Duane Schuster of the City of
La Palma and seating first and second
alternates to the Mayor
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the letter from Mayor Duane Schuster of the City of La Palma resigning from the
Board of Directors of District No. 3, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the following first and second alternates to the Mayor be
seated as members of the Board:
District Active Director Alternate Director
3 Wally Linn Eva G. Miner
A-
1/24/96
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the Joint Chair
The Joint Chair announced that an adjourned regular meeting will be called for all
Districts on Wednesday, February 14, 1996 to discuss the landfill acquisition. The
Orange County Investment Pool agreement with the County of Orange could possibly
be added to the same agenda.
Joint Chair Cox reminded the Directors of the Joint Board Meeting regarding the
Strategic Plan Workshop being held on Saturday, January 27, 1996 at 9:00 AM to
12:00 PM. This meeting would be a review of alternatives to determine Districts'
policies for the strategic plan. In addition, the business community and environmental
community were invited to attend.
It was then reported that at the CASA Conference held in Palm Springs, District staff
members made presentations on various issues of privatization, what it means to be
"business friendly", and the positive impacts of reclaimed water on the bay. The Joint
Chair commended Irwin Haydock, Mike Moore, Adriana Renescu and Mahin Talebi for
their excellent presentations.
The following tentatively scheduled upcoming meetings were then announced:
Ad Hoc Committee re Landfill Issues -Wednesday, January 31, at 5:30 pm
Planning, Design, and Construction Committee -Thursday, February 1, at
5:30 pm
Operations, Maintenance, and Technical Services Committee -Wednesday,
February 7, at 5:30 pm
Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee -Wednesday,
February 14, at 5:30 pm
Adjourned Regular Meeting -Wednesday, February 14, at 7:30 p.m.
Executive Committee - Wednesday, February 21, at 5:30 p.m.
ALL DISTRICTS
Presentation of service oin to District
Employee Robert J. Ooten
Assistant General Manager, Blake Anderson, recognized Districts' Director of
Operations, Robert J. Ooten, for 15 years of service to the Districts and presented
Mr. Ooten with a 15-year service pin.
-5-
1/24/96
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the Joint Chair
The Joint Chair announced that an adjourned regular meeting may need to be called
for all Districts on Wednesday, February 14, 1996 to discuss the landfill acquisition.
The Orange County Investment Pool agreement with the County of Orange could
possibly be added to the same agenda.
Joint Chair Cox reminded the Directors of the Joint Board Meeting regarding the
Strategic Plan Workshop being held on Saturday, January 27, 1996 at 9:00 AM to
12:00 PM. This meeting would be a review of alternatives to determine Districts'
policies for the strategic plan. In addition, the business community and environmental
community were invited to attend.
It was then reported that at the CASA Conference held in Palm Springs, District staff
members made presentations on various issues of privatization, what it means to be
"business friendly", and the positive impacts of reclaimed water in the bay. The Joint
Chair commended Irwin Haydock, Mike Moore, Adriana Renescu and Mahin Talebi for
their excellent presentations.
The following tentatively scheduled upcoming meetings were then announced, as
follows:
Ad Hoc Committee re Landfill Issues -Wednesday, January 31, at 5:30 p.m.
Planning, Design, and Construction Committee -Thursday, February 1, at
5:30 p.m.
Operations, Maintenance, and Technical Services Committee -Wednesday,
February 7, at 5:30 p.m.
Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee -Wednesday,
February 14, at 5:30 p.m.
Adjourned Regular Meeting -Wednesday, February 14, at 7:30 p.m.
Executive Committee - Wednesday, February 21, at 5:30 p.m.
ALL DISTRICTS
Presentation of service pin to District
Employee Robert J. Ooten
Joint Chair Cox recognized Districts' Director of Operations, Robert J. Ooten, for
15 years of service to the Districts and presented Mr. Ooten with a 15-year service pin.
-5-
1/24/96
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the General Counsel
The General Counsel referred District No. 3 Directors to a memorandum included in
their meeting folders that evening, updating Directors on the status of the matter
entitled County Sanitation Districts No. 3 v. United Technologies Corporation, at al.,
Orange County Superior Court Case No. 722816.
DISTRICT 1
Approval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held
December 13, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as
mailed. Director Roger Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item
be made a matter of record.
DISTRICT 2
Approval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held
December 13, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as
mailed. Director Roger Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item
be made a matter of record.
DISTRICT 3
Approval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held
December 13, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as
mailed. Director Roger Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item
be made a matter of record.
DISTRICT 5
Approval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held
December 13, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as
mailed.
-6-
1/24/96
DISTRICT 6
Approval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held
December 13, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as
mailed.
DISTRICT 7
Approval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held
December 13, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as
mailed.
DISTRICT 11
Approval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held
December 13, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as
mailed. Director Roger Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item
be made a matter of record.
DISTRICT 13
Approval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held
December 13, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as
mailed.
DISTRICT 14
Approval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meetings held
November 15, 1995, and December 13, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be
deemed approved, as mailed.
-7-
1/24/96
ALL DISTRICTS
Ratification of Payment of Joint and
Individual District Claims
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That payment of Joint and Individual District claims set forth on exhibits "A" , "B", "C",
"D", and "E"attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized
below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so
indicated.
11/15/95 1129/95
DISTRICT NO. 14 - $ 311.129 19 fi 4 563.18
12/13/95 1227/95 01/10196
ALL DISTRICTS
Joint Operating Fund - $775,555.24 $747,037.33 $590262.64
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 393,437.92 1,311,228.89 260,472.07
Joint Worldng Capital Fund - 471.937.47 212,140.44 225,832.58
Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 69,738.87 922520 18,647.75
DISTRICT NO. 1 - 560.60 3,000.00 9,528.64
DISTRICT NO.2 - 30,632.89 1,113.50 46,632.37
DISTRICT NO.3 - 188,228.36 147,793.23 69,96525
DISTRICT NO.5 - 4,801.27 648.54 18,008.38
DISTRICT NO.6 - 161.60 62.31 2,59323
DISTRICT NO.7 - 479,491.04 42,619.70 50,673.44
DISTRICT NO. 11 - 592.00 108.379.84 129,423.70
DISTRICT NO. 13 - 0.00 0.00 154.75
DISTRICT NO. 14 - 15.95 19,941.50 465.52
DISTRICTS NOS.5&6 JOINT - 278.432.18 25,581.80 80,847.33
DISTRICTS NOS.6&7 JOINT - 2.042.89 21128 1.960.71
DISTRICTS NOS.7&14 JOINT - 6,707.57 15.83 5,169.96
$2.702.335.85 $2.628.999.39 $1.510.838.32
-8-
1/24/96
ALL DISTRICTS
Authorizina renewal of memberships
in the California Association of Sanitation
Agencies (CASA) and the Association of
Metropolitan Seweraae Aaencies (AMSA)
for the 1996 calendar year
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That renewal of memberships in the California Association of Sanitation Agencies
(CASA) and the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies (AMSA)for the 1996
calendar year be, and are hereby, authorized.
ALL DISTRICTS (PDC95-26)
Accepting Purchase of Spark Ignited
Enaines for Use in Central Power
Generation Systems, Job No. J-19A. as
complete
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 96-1, accepting Purchase
of Spark Ignited Engines for use in Central Power Generation Systems, Job
No. J-19A, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion, and
approving final Closeout Agreement for a final total contract amount of
$19,436,644.82. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these
minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive and file draft minutes of the Ad Hoc
Committee re Landfill Issues
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the draft minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re Landfill Issues meetings held on
December 13 and December 27, 1995, and January 10 and January 17, 1996, be,
and are hereby, received and ordered filed.
-9-
1/24/96
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive and file draft minutes of the
Steering Committee
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the draft minutes of the Steering Committee meeting held on December 13,
1995, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed.
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive and file draft minutes of the Operations.
Maintenance. and Technical Services Committee
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the draft minutes of the Operations, Maintenance, and Technical Services
Committee meeting held on January 3, 1996, be, and are hereby, received and
ordered filed.
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive and file draft minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee
re Space Utilization Studv
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the draft minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization Study meeting
held on January 4, 1996, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed.
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive and file draft minutes of the Plannina.
Design, and Construction Committee
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the draft minutes of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee meeting
held on January 4, 1996, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed,
-10-
1/24/96
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive and file draft minutes of the Finance. Administration.
and Human Resources Committee
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the draft minutes of the Finance, Administration, and Human Resources
Committee meeting held on January 10, 1996, be, and are hereby, received and
ordered filed.
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive and file draft minutes of the Executive Committee
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the draft minutes of the Executive Committee meeting held on January 17,
1996, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed.
ALL DISTRICTS
Retaining current committee system of three
policy committees, and convening the Executive
Committee on an as-needed basis
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors concur with the recommended actions of the Steering
Committee to retain the current committee system of three policy committees, and
convene the Executive Committee on an as-needed basis.
ALL DISTRICTS (PDC96-02)
Accepting Miscellaneous Improvements at
Plant No 1. Job No. P1-42, and Miscellaneous
Improvements at Plant No. 2. Job No. P249.
as complete
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 96-2, accepting
Miscellaneous Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-42, and Miscellaneous
Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P249, as complete, authorizing execution of a
Notice of Completion, and approving Final Closeout Agreement for a final total
contract amount of$239,213.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby
made a part of these minutes.
_11_
1/24/96
ALL DISTRICTS (PDC96-04)
Aoorovino plans and specifications re Job
Nos. P1-41: Pl-43: P1-44: P246: P2-50:
P2-53-2: SP199500217SP19950059
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 96-3, approving plans and
specifications for Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers 3,4, and 5 at Plant No. 1, Job
No. P1-41; Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-43;
Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-44; Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers D
through 0 at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-48; Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems
at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-50; Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53-2;
Tunnel Cover Replacement at Billings Tunnel at Plant No. 2, SP19950021; Sludge
Piping Modification Primary Sedimentation Basins 6-15, SP19950059, and
authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. Said
resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS (PDC96-05)
Actions re Demolition of Old Laboratory. Job
No. J-11-1. and Restoration of Old Laboratory
for Human Resources Department, Job
No. J-11-2
Providing for the conversion of the Old
Laboratory, Job No. J-11-1. to Restoration
of Old Laboratory for Human Resources
Deoartment. Job No. J-11-2
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the conversion of the Old Laboratory, Job No. J-11-1, to Restoration of
Old Laboratory for Human Resources Department, Job No. J-11-2, and
providing for funds in the amount of$375,000.00 for said project, be, and is
hereby, approved.
-12-
M4i96
Authorizina the General Manager to establish
the date for receipt of bids for Interior Asbestos
Removal from Old Laboratory, Job No. J-11-1A
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to establish the date
for receipt of bids for Interior Asbestos Removal from Old Laboratory, Job
No. J-11-1A; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the budgeted amount of$150,000.00, which was an
approved portion of Job No. J-11-1, be, and is hereby, authorized to be
transferred to Job No. J-11-1A.
ALL DISTRICTS (PDC96-061
Approving Addendum No. 1 to the Professional
Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers
re Job Nos. J-33 and J-34
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee certification of the final
negotiated fee relative to Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement
with John Carollo Engineers to prepare plans and specifications and to provide
construction support services for Standby Power Reliability Modifications, Job
No. J-33, and Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades, Job No. J-34, providing for
additional design and construction services, be, and is hereby, received, ordered
filed, and approved; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 964,
approving Addendum No. 1 to said agreement with John Carollo Engineers for said
additional services on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, subconsultant
fees, and fixed profit, for an additional amount not to exceed $226,740.00, increasing
the total authorized compensation from $950,252.00 to an amount not to exceed
$1,176,992.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these
minutes.
-13-
1124/96
ALL DISTRICTS (OMTS95-041)
Actions re Comoressed Natural Gas Refueling
Station, Job No. P1-51
AAoproving Professional Services Agreement
with SoCalGas
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 96-5, approving
Professional Services Agreement with Southern California Gas Company
(SoCalGas)for design and construction management services for
Compressed Natural Gas Refueling Station, Job No. P1-51, on an hourly-rate
basis for labor plus overhead, for an amount not to exceed $64,500.00. Said
resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
Authorizing the General Manager to
solicit bids and award purchase order
contract re Job No. PI-51A
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to solicit bids re
Purchase of Equipment for Compressed Natural Gas Refueling Station, Job
No. P1-51A; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized
to award a purchase order contract to the lowest bidder for an amount not to
exceed $399,300.00, plus applicable taxes and freight.
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive and file monthly investment report of
Pacific Investment Management Company
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the monthly investment report regarding performance monitoring of Pacific
Investment Management Company be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed.
-14-
1/24/96
DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7 & 11 (ONLY)
Actions re AIG Financial Products
Corp. (AIG) for replacement of
Letter of Credit. Refunding Certificates
of Particioation. Series 1992
Approving Substitute Standby
Certificate Purchase Agreement
with Barclays Bank
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt the following resolutions, approving
Substitute Standby Certificate Purchase Agreement with Barclays Bank, and
authorizing staff to take all necessary actions re replacement of the Standby
Letter of Credit:
District No. Resolution No.
1 96-6-1
2 96-7-2
3 96-8-3
5 96-9-5
6 96-10-6
7 96-11-7
11 96-12-11
Authorizing staff to retain services of
bond counsel and authorizing the General
Manager to execute agreement
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to retain the services of a bond
counsel firm for the transaction, as recommended by General Counsel, in an
amount not to exceed $25,000.00, to be reimbursed to the Districts by AIG;
and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized
to execute said agreement, in form approved by General Counsel.
-15-
1124/96
Directing staff to submit all necessary
documents for this transaction at the
January 24 1996 meeting for execution
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That staff be, and is hereby, directed to submit all necessary documents for
this transaction to the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 & 11, at the January 24, 1996 meeting for execution.
ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR96-02)
Authorizing staff to issue a purchase order
to AmeriData for Purchase of Four Compaq
Server-Class Computers (Specification
No. E-262R-2)
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue a purchase order to AmeriData for
Four Compaq Server-Class Computers (Specification No. E-262R-2), for use as
Districts'-wide network servers, for a total amount not to exceed $135,875.00, plus
sales tax and 1% WAS fees.
Director Mark A. Murphy requested that his abstention from voting on this item be
made a matter of record.
ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR96-03)
Amending Resolution No. 95-105.
Authorizing the establishment of Provisions
for Programmers covered by the Professional
Employees MOU for standby and callback pay
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 96-13, amending
Resolution No. 95-105, authorizing the establishment of provisions for Programmers
covered by the Professional Employees MOU for standby and callback pay. Said
resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
-16-
1/24/96
ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR96-05)
Amendino Resolution No. 95-105,
Rescinding provisions granting a 1% salary
increase to all employees re retiree medical
health premium offset grogram
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 96-14, amending
Resolution No. 95-105, rescinding provisions granting a 1% salary increase to all
employees re retiree medical health premium offset program.
Director John M. Gullixson requested that his opposition to the motion be made a
matter of record.
ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR96-08)
Authorizing staff to report to Southern
California Association of Governments (SCAGj
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to report to Southern California Association of
Governments (SCAG) the Sanitation Districts' position on the Finance Chapter of
SCAG's Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide.
ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR96-06)
Actions re Benchmarking and Performance
Measurement Update
Verbal report of Assistant General Manager
The Assistant General Manager, Judy Wilson, gave a brief report on
Benchmarking and Performance Measurement. She then introduced Greg
Mathews, Principle Administrative Analyst, who gave an overview of costs
over the last ten years, and Bob Ooten, Director of Operations, who shared his
observations on the privatization program in Indianapolis.
Receive and file staff report
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the staff report dated January 10, 1996 re Benchmarking and
Performance Measurement Update, be, and is hereby, received and ordered
filed.
-17-
1124/96
ALL DISTRICTS
Directing that the Board of Supervisors be
ree uested to file a Resolution of Application
with the Local Agency Formation Commission
ILAFCO)for County Sanitation District No. 99
re pr000sed acquisition of County of Orange
Integrated Waste Management System
After a brief update by the Assistant General Managers of Administration and
Operations, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 96-15, directing that the
Orange County Board of Supervisors be requested to file a Resolution of Application
with the Orange County Local Agency Formation Commission initiating proceedings
relative to proposed formation of County Sanitation District No. 99 for acquisition,
maintenance, and operation of a landfill and refuse disposal system. Said resolution,
by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
Director Victor Leipzig requested that his opposition to the motion be made a matter
of record.
ALL DISTRICTS
Status report re County's Commingled Investment Pool
Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager of Operations, gave a brief report on the
status of the Orange County Commingled Investment Pool Committee and the
County of Orange bankruptcy.
ALL DISTRICTS
General Counsel's comments Prior to Closed Session
General Counsel reported to the Directors the need for a closed session as
authorized by Government Code Section 54956.9 to discuss and consider the item
that is specified as Item 15(b)(1) on the published Agenda.
-18-
1/24/96
ALL DISTRICTS
Convene in Closed Session pursuant to
Government Code Section 54956.9
The Boards convened in closed session at 8:35 p.m. pursuant to Government Code
Section 54956.9. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Boards of
Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code
Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of
Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. A report of actions
taken will be publicly reported at the time the approved action becomes final re
Agenda Item 15(b)(1).
ALL DISTRICTS
Reconvene in regular session
At 8:46 p.m., the Boards reconvened in regular session.
DISTRICT 1
Addournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be
adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:46 p.m.
DISTRICT 2
Addiournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be
adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:46 p.m.
-19-
1/24196
DISTRICT 3 (PDC96-01)
Actions re Improvements to Miller-Holder
Trunk Sewer System, Reach 2 (5,800 feet
North of Rosecrans Avenue to Imperial
Highway), Contract No. 3-38-2
AApprovino Change Order No. 1
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for said project,
authorizing an addition of$45,255.68 to the contract with Calfon Construction,
Inc. for seven items of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved.
Approving Change Order No. 2
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for said project,
authorizing a deduction of$32,126.00 from the contract with Calfon
Construction, Inc. for adjustment of engineer's quantities, be, and is hereby,
approved.
Acceptino Contract No. 3-38-2 as complete
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 96-16-3, accepting
said project as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion, and
approving final Closeout Agreement for a final total contract amount of
$1,104,882.68. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of
these minutes.
DISTRICT 3
Adjoumment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be
adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:46 p.m.
-20-
1/24/96
DISTRICT 5
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be
adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:46 p.m.
DISTRICT 6
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be
adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:46 p.m.
DISTRICT 7
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be
adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:46 p.m.
DISTRICT 11
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be
adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:46 p.m.
DISTRICT 13
Adiournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be
adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:46 p.m.
-21-
1/24/96
DISTRICT 14
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be
adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:46 p.m.
{/Jl
Secretary of&Ao r of Directors
of County SarVion ' tricts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5. 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14
-22-
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 11/10195 PAGE 7
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITAT.ON DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 11/15/95 POSTING DATE 11/16/95
SUMMARY AMOUNT
61 OPER FUND $231.50
01 CONSTR FUND $1.345.57
02 OPER FUND $1.169.25
02 CAP FAC FUND $46,970.48
02 CONSTR FUND $4,694.95
03 OPER FUND $25,127A0
03 CAP FAC FUND $423,166S2
03 CONSTR FUND $3.873AD
O5 OPER FUND $429,80
05 CONSTR FUND $1.076.49
06 OPER FUND $173.00
O6 CONSTR FUND $768,08
07 OPER FUND $8,864.61
07 CAP FAC FUND $550.170.80
X 07 CONSTR FUND $1,307.43
x 011 OPER FUND $249.25
011 CAP FAC FUND S202,877.12
011 CONST FUND $1.197.87
--I 913 0PER FUND $8.50
D 000NS UND $3.40
14 OPER FUND 550.00 S 50.00
014 CAP FAC FUND $311,059.23 311,059.23
914 CONST FUND 518.9E 19.96
05&6 OPER FUND $166.94
05&6 CAP FAC FUND $156,990.37 5311.129.19
07 614 OPER FUND $794.77
JT OPER FUND $658,139.29
CORF S918,505.92
SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $19,724.59
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL S3D6,045.29
$3.644.561.74
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 112N85 PAGES - -
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 1129/95 POSTING DATE 1129195
WARRANT NO. VENDOR
148595 WACKENHUT CORP. $14.300.70 CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS
148596 WALL STREET JOURNAL 5306.01 SUBSCRIPTION
148597 WARREN GORHAM 5 LAMONT INC $190.74 PUBLICATION
148598 WA%IE $222.71 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
148599 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $23,912.54 CAUSTIC SODA MO 6-23.95
148600 WEST-UTE SUPPLY CO. SB13.23 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
148601 WESCO $574.93 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
148602 WOLFE AND ASSOCIATES,INC. $3.940.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
148603 ROURKE,WOODRUFF 8 SPRADUN $92,805.51 LEGAL SERVICES MO 7.26.95
146604 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $979.54 LAB SUPPLIES
148605 JOHNSON YOKOGAWA CORP. SBISS INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
Tn TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 1120195 $1.851.112.20
X
2
to
SUMMARY AMOUNT
0TJ
1 02 OPER FUND 114.25
02 CAP FAC FUND $2,041.51
03 OPER FUND $52.621.92 -
03 CAP PAC FUND $23.926.29
05 OPER FUND $689.25
07 OPER FUND $430.42
07 CAP FAC FUND $20,292.92
011 OPER FUND $9.593.96
4 UN51,94o.a3 $1,940.43
014 CAP FAC FUND $2.622.75 2,622.75
0596 OPER FUND $17.80
0687 OPER FUND $211.12 $4,563.18
07614 OPER FUND $16.59
JT OPER FUND $913.082.79
CORE $569.680.05
SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $28.159.68
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $225.570,47
$1.851,112.20
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 12108195 PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 12/13195 POSTING DATE 12/13/95
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
148631 A-1 VISUAL SYSTEMS $1,533.50 OFFICE SUPPLIES
148632 ABB INDUSTRIAL SYSTEMS INC $2,660.00 TRAINING-MAINTENANCE
148633 AG TECH COMPANY $58.160.83 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10.9.91
148634 ABRASIVE ENG.TOOLING&EQUIP, $142.49 HARDWARE
148635 ACORN CONSULTING $4,485.00 CONSULTING SERVICES
148636 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $18.037.20 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.0.8-9-09
148637 ALTA-ROBBINS $320.70 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
148638 AMERIDATA $1.495.49 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
148639 BLAKE P.ANDERSON 5108.57 REIMBURSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE
148640 ANIXTER-DISTRIBUTION $494.79 COMPUTER SUPPLIES
148641 APPLE ONE $4.083.20 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
148642 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $16.168.95 - OFFICE EQUIPMENT
148643 AQUATIC BIOASSAY&CONSULT $2.835.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
m 148644 ARENS INDUSTRIES,INC. $4.072.51 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
x 145645 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT $551.90 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
148646 ARMOR-VAC $1,500.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES
w 148647 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. $120.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL
148648 ASSOCIATED CONCRETE PRODUCTS $533.38 BUILDING MATERIALS
148649 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $4.333.66 PAYROLL SERVICES
n 148650 E S BABCOCK&SONS INC $555.00 LAB ANALYSIS
1� 148657 BANANA BLUEPRINT $592.88 PRINTING M.0.11-07-84
148652 BANCROFT-WHITNEY CO.. $333.48 PUBLICATION
148653 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $810.20 BATTERIES
148654 BAUER COMPRESSOR $311.00 COMPRESSOR PARTS
148655 BEAR STATE PUMP&EQUIP $794.76 PUMP PARTS
148656 BEHR PROCESS CORP $62.94 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT -
148657 BEV CUSTER $86.20 PUBLICATIONS
148658 WT BILLARD $588.69 BUILDING REPAIRS
145659 BIO-GRO DIVISION $43,309.28 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 4-26.95
148660 BLAIR-MARTIN CO,INC. $189.43 VALVE MANIFOLDS
148661 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $16.728.10 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1d1,P2.48
148662 BNI BOOKS $167.80 BOOKS
148663 _ THE BURKE COMPANY $86.12 CONTAINERS
148664 BURKE ENGINEERING CO $292.17 ELECTRIC PARTS
148665 BUSH&ASSOCIATES,INC. S4,5D4.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6&94
148666 CH2M HILL $215,760.82 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-31
148667 C.L.TECHNOLOGY $720.00 GAS ANALYSIS SERVICES
148668 CM H SOFTWARE $256.50 SOFTWARE
14BB69 C.P.I. $1.549.91 LAB SUPPLIES
148670 CS COMPANY $8,012.92 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
148671 CALFON CONSTRUCTION $452,384.84 CONSTRUCTION 7-22&7-24
148672 CALTROL,INC. $9,552.85 HARDWARE
148673 CALIFORNIA AUTO COLLISION,INC. $2,581.01 TRUCK BODY REPAIR
148674 CALIF.ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS $16.00 MECHANICAL PARTS
148675 CALIFORNIA WATER ENVIRONMENTAL $855.48 PUBLICATIONS
148676 CAMAU CORP. $400.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 12108MS PAGE
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 12JIYOS POSTING DATE 12/13/95
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
148677 CANUS CORPORATION $593.39 FIBER OPTIC CABLE
148678 CARLETON ENGINEERS $25.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES-AIR QUALITY
148679 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $348.25 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-38,J-33
148680 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $1,458.78 OFFICE FURNITURE
148681 CERFNET $52.35 COMPUTER SERVICES
148682 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $10J17.73 PUMP PARTS
148683 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $16,571.44 ELECTRIC PARTS
148684 CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS $813.60 FREIGHT
146685 CONSUMER PIPE $1,077.64 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
148686 CONTINENTAL EQUIP&SUPPLY $548.73 MISC.HARDWARE
148687 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $3,368.51 ENGINE PARTS
m 148688 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $132.18 TRUCK PARTS
X 148689 COUNTERPART ENTERPRISES $246.86 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
= 148690 COUNTY CLERK $200.00 EXEMPTION FEE
Ly 148691 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $3,772.65 ELECTRIC PARTS
148692 CREATIVE SCREEN ARTS $420.33 SAFETY TAGS
148693 CROMPTON&KNOWLES COLORS $181.80 TRACING DYE
['l 148694 CHARLES P.CROWLEY,CO. $911.99 INSTRUMENT PARTS
148695 OGS-PROCUREMENT $75.00 PUBLICATIONS
fJ 148696 ALBERT W DAMES INC $135,285.34 CONSTRUCTION 3-36R
148697 DELL COMPUTER CORP $25,275.39 COMPUTER PARTS
148695 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIF, $34,363.26 DENTAL INSURANCE PUN M.0.1-12-94
148699 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $940.00 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE
148700 DRESSER INDUSTRIES $2,133.68 INSTRUMENT PARTS
148101 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $299.44 PAINT SUPPLIES
148702 DUALS SALES $428.58 FITTINGS
148703 ESP NORTH $1,857.22 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
148704 E-TRACE INSTRUMENTS $287.00 COMPUTER PARTS
148705 EDWARDS HIGH VACUUM INTER. $148.92 LAB SUPPLIES
148706 HELEN EGGERS $401.08 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148707 ELECT AIR TOOL CO $762.17 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
148708 ENCHANTER,INC. $2.800.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5.24.95
148709 ESSCO PUMPS AND CONTROLS $401.17 PUMP PARTS
148710 ENVIRONMENTAL PROD.USA $2.413.60 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
148711 EXFO $0,795.00 FIBEROPTIC TEST KIT
148712 FLUID TECH.SALES $2,146A4 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
148713 FST SAND AND GRAVEL,INC. $511.04 ROAD BASE MATERIALS
148714 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $13,535.00 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9.91
148715 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $549.75 AIR FREIGHT
148716 FIRST CHOICE $810.55 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT
148717 FISCHER B PORTER CO. $355.21 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES
148718 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $1.370.50 LAB SUPPLIES
148719 FISONS INSTRUMENTS $840.45 LAB SUPPLIES
148720 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $261.19 PHOTO SUPPLIES '
148721 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $18,678.06 WATER USE
148722 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $496A0 PAINT SUPPLIES
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE IDOW95 PAGE 3
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 12J13195 POSTING DATE 12113195
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
148723 THE FOXBORO CO. $133.09 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
148724 FRY'S ELECTRONICS $573.65 ELECTRONIC B COMPUTER SUPPLIES
148725 FULLER FORD $17.729.19 TRUCK
148726 CITY OF FULLERTON $373.51 WATER USE
148727 GET,INC. $1.032.66 OFFICE SUPPLIES
148728 GANAHL LUMBER CO. 2206.87 LUMBERAIARDWARE
146729 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $2,569.54 CHEMICALS
148730 THE GARTNER GROUP $32.583.34 SERVICE AGREEMENT
148731 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $388.69 ELECTRIC PARTS
148732 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1,024.97 TELEPHONE SERVICES
146733 GIERLICH4.UTCHELL,INC. $6.157.48 PUMP PARTS
148734 GA INDUSTRIES INC. $1,485.00 VALVE
X 148735 GOODWAY TECHNOLOGIES CORP. $999.49 INDUSTRIAL VACUUM
= 148738 GOVT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOC. $480.00 CAER AWARD SUBMITTAL
r-i 148737 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $3.886.01 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
148738 GRASSY S.T.I. $2,389.26 ENGINE PARTS
_4 148739 GRAYBAR 580.30 COMMUNICATION SUPPLIES
n 148740 DGA CONSULTANTS $10,806.11 SURVEYING SERVICES MOB-23-95&MO 641-94
1 148741 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS $3.786.60 CONTAINER RENTALS
w 148742 PL HAWN CO,INC. $9,440.42 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
148743 HELLO DIRECT $397.35 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
1487" HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT $2.003.33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN.
148745 HEWLETTPACKARD $202.58 SERVICE AGREEMENT
148746 MILT,INC. $3.045.03 TOOLS
148747 HOERSIGER CVS CALIF., INC. $279.08 COMPRESSOR PARTS
148748 HOLMES&NARVER,INC. $34,547.59 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1.44,P2-53
148749 HOME DEPOT $698.07 SMALL HARDWARE
148750 SOUTHWEST SCIENTIFIC,INC. $928.18 METER PARTS
148751 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $1,407.77 PAINT SUPPLIES
148752 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $19.33 WATER USE
146753 HYCLONE LABORATORIES INC $820.51 LAB SUPPLIES
148764 IDM CONTROLS INC $303.90 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
148755 IEEE SERVICE CENTER - C87 $766.65 PUBLICATIONS
148756 IPCO SAFETY $4.081.19 SAFETY SUPPLIES
148757 IRD MECHANALYSIS $537.54 INSTRUMENT PARTS
148755 ITT BARTON SALES $2,023.51 BACKFLOW TESTERS
148759 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $124,588.93 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11.18-92
148760 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $218.51 CONNECTORS
148761 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT 85A0 WATER USE
148762 J.D.I.TECHNOLOGIES $50D.63 PRINTER PARTS
148763 JIT COMPUTER SOURCE,INC. $1,906.10 SOFTWARE
148764 JAMISON ENGINEERING $5,105.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
148765 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $603.28 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
148766 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO. $2,829.66 GAUGE '
146767 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $137.69 ELECTRIC PARTS
148768 JONES CHEMICALS,INC. $15.239.78 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE NO 4415-95
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE IVOW95 PAGE4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 12/13/95 POSTING DATE 12/13/95
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
146759 KALLEENS COMPUTER PRODUCTS $1.190.98 COMPUTER SUPPLIES
148710 FRANCES L.KALUZNY $1.760.00 HUMAN RESOURCES CONSULTANT
145"1 KENNEDY HYDRAULICS $1,357.38 MOTOR REPAIRS
148772 KING BEARING,INC. $1.548.42 MACHINE SUPPLIES
148773 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES E3,096.24 TOOLS
148774 LEE&RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC. $8.353.31 ENGINEERING SERVICES
140775 K.P.LINDSTROM.INC. $9,656AI ENVIR.CONSULTING SERVICES MO 12.9-90
148776 MPS $97.88 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
140777 MACOMCO 5464d0 SERVICE AGREEMENT
148778 NAG SYSTEMS $526.90 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
148779 MAINTENANCE TECH.SERV. $1.141.14 MISC.HARDWARE
148780 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS,INC. $5.088.21 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
m 148781 MARDEN SUSCO INC. $93.75 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
Z 148782 DICK E MARSH $40.00 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148783 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $576.65 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
to
148784 MIDWAY MFG.&MACHINING $8,028.39 MECHANICAL REPAIRS
148785 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3.405.35 UNIFORM RENTALS
n 1487BS MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO. 5217.00 INSTRUMENT
I 148787 MOORE INDUSTRIES $972.83 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
r 148768 NEC TECHNOLOGIES,INC. $6,215.65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
148789 NATIONAL ENVIRO.INFO.SERV. 5111.50 PUBLICATION
148790 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES $6.001.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES
148791 NATIONAL WATER RESEARCH $50,000.00 ANNUAL CONTRIBUTION-NWRI
148792 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $676.13 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
148793 NETWORK GENERAL CORP. $4.999.61 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
148794 NEWARK ELECTRONICS $260.52 INSTRUMENT PARTS
148795 NICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY $3.144.43 LUBRICANTS/DIESEL FUEL
148796 LOYD T.NITZEN II AND $22,000.00 LIABILITY CLAIM SETTLEMENT
148797 NORGREN $169.40 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
148798 NORTEL PRODUCT TRAINING $1.345.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
148799 NU-WEST FABRICATION 5304.28 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
148800 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $4,438.45 OFFICE SUPPLIES
148801 THE OHMART CORP $1.113.91 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
148802 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $2,318.28 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
148803 ORANGE COURIER 5294S0 COURIER SERVICES
148804 ORANGE VALVE&FTTTING CO. $2.626.01 FITTINGS
148505 ORRICK HERRINGTON&SUTCLIFFE $4,000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
148806 OXYGEN SERVICE $2.547.39 SPECIALTY GASES
148807 COUNTY OF ORANGE $60.00 ADMINISTRATIVE FEES
148808 ORANGE CO EMPLOYEES $204.796.00 EARLY RETIREMENT PROGRAM MO 34.95
148809 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $10.80.51 WORKERS COMP REIMBURSEMENT
148810 COUNTY OF ORANGE $199.00 PERMITS
148811 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT $54.594.50 GAP WATER USE M.O.6-9-93
148812 PSI $881.52 HARDWARE '
148813 PSOC(POOL SUPPLY OF OC) $113.73 OPERATING SUPPLIES
148814 PSSI $5.445.46 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 12/08195 PAGE 5
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 12H3/95 POSTING DATE 12/13/95
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
148816 PACIFIC CLIPPINGS $113.20 CONTRACT SERVICE
148816 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $1,777.66 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
148817 PACIFIC PARTS $55,623.20 INSTRUMENT PARTS
148818 PACO PUMPS $1,466.22 FITTINGS
148819 PACIFIC BELL $16.62 TELEPHONE SERVICES
148820 PACIFIC WALK-IN MEDICAL $60.00 MEDICAL SERVICES
148821 PAGENET $82.10 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
148822 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $5,294.30 REIMS.PETTY CASH,TRAINING 8 TRAVEL
148823 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $110.041.20 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3-29.95
148824 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS $358.06 CONSULTING SERVICE
148825 POLYPURE,INC. $20.931.50 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3.11-92
148826 POWER DESIGN $943.90 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS
m 148821 POWER SYSTEMS TESTING CO. $1,100.00 REPAIR RELAY METERS
= 145828 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $96.00 ICE FOR SAMPLES
145829 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE IND. $304.00 SOILTESTING
148830 PROMINENT FLUID CONTROL,INC. $799.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL
-I 148831 PRIMA $205.00 MEMBERSHIP FEE
t'1 148832 PUBLIC SECTOR EXCELLENCE $2,250.00 TRAINING CONSULTANT-RISK MGMT
I 148833 PUMPING SOLUTIONS $176.71 PUMP PARTS
148834 QUESTRON CORP. $948.00 LAB SUPPLIES
148835 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $1,891.16 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS
148836 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $2,062.75 TRASH REMOVAL
148837 RAIN FOR RENT $2,747.94 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
148838 RED WING SHOES $264.29 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES
148039 THE REGISTER $2,149.60 NOTICES&ADS
148940 REISH MARINE STUDIES,INC. $760.00 OCEAN MONITORING
148841 REMEDYTEMP $14,709.17 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
148842 REPUBLIC ENGINES $84.47 TRUCK PARTS
148843 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $47.42 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
148844 SCHWING AMERICA.INC. $1.506.43 PUMP PARTS
148845 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $275.84 SPECIALTY GASES
148846 SEA COAST DESIGNS $2.909.25 LAB SUPPLIES
148847 CITY OF SEAL BEACH $301.05 WATER USE
148848 SELF INSURANCE PLANS $674.66 LICENSE FEE
148849 SENTIENT SYSTEMS,INC. $8,400.00 FACILITATOR SERVICES
148850 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $3,464.12 TOOLS
148851 SHASTA ELECTRIC $21,710.00 CONTRACTSERVICE
148852 SHURELUCK SALES $1.650.06 TOOLS0IARDWARE
148853 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $1,798.09 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS
148854 SMITH-EMERY CO. $216.00 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-13.94
148855 SOUTH BAY FOUNDRY INC $5,262.81 MANHOLE FRAMES
148856 SOUTH COAST WATER $160.00 LAB SUPPLIES
148857 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. $62,778.45 POWER
148858 STARNA CELLS,INC. $173.19 LAB SUPPLIES
148859 SUMMIT STEEL $2,050.57 METAL
148860 SUNSET FORD $136.19 TRUCK PARTS
FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 1VO8195 PAGES -
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 12JI3195 POSTING DATE 12/13195
WARRANT NO. VENDOR
148661 SUPELCO,INC. $81.20 LAB SUPPLIES
148862 SUPER CHEM CORP. $670.80 CHEMICALS
148863 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $214.40 ELECTRIC CART PARTS
148864 TEKMAR COMPANY $181.93 LAB SUPPLIES
148865 THEODORE ROBBINS FORD $2,181.93 VEHICLE RENTAL-SUMMER PROGRAM
148866 THE RYAN TYLER GROUP $740.00 BANK STATEMENT RECONCILIATION
148867 THOMAS BROS MAPS $4,310.00 PRINTING
140868 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $117.28 MECHANICAL PARTS
145869 TONER SYSTEM INTERNATIONAL $1,303.78 PRINTER SUPPLIES
148870 TONY'S LOCK B SAFE SERVICE $148.67 LOCKS 8 KEYS
148871 TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY,INC. $3.973.84 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.0.5-11-94
148872 TRUCK B AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $341.94 TRUCK PARTS
TTI 148873 TRUCK PARTS SUPPLY $78.63 TRUCK PARTS
X 148674 TRUESDAIL LABS $4.906.00 LAB SERVICES
148875 JG TUCKER 8 SON,INC. $6.526.05 INSTRUMENT PARTS
w 148876 TWINING LABORATORIES $13,712.88 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-13.94
145877 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $30.OD LABSUPPLIES
148878 UNISOURCEWOR BUTLER PAPER $239.74 OFFICE SUPPLIES
r� 148879 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $62.38 PARCEL SERVICES
m 148880 VWR SCIENTIFIC $1.538.83 LAB SUPPLIES
148851 VALIN CORPORATION $680.59 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
148882 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS 52,225.01 FREIGHT
148883 VERNE'S PLUMBING $475.W PLUMBING SERVICES
148884 VERTEX SYSTEMS $7.480.00 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT
148885 VORTEX INDUSTRIES $544.28 BUILDING REPAIRS
148086 WACKENHUT CORP. $31,678.23 CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS
148887 WAL-CON CONSTRUCTION CO. $276,W4.94 CONSTRUCTION 5.37-3
1488H CARL WARREN B CO. 5443.77 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR
148589 WARRINGTON $3.492.50 SERVICE AGREEMENT
148890 WATERS CORPORATION $3.674.01 SERVICE AGREEMENT
148891 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $20.719.94 CAUSTIC SODA MO8-23.95
148092 WEST-UTE SUPPLY CO. $968.04 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
148893 WESCO $14.43 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
1488M WIRE MARKERS,INC. $2.245.72 MARKERS
14BB95 XEROX CORP. $15,387.19 COPIER LEASES
148896 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $860.92 LAB SUPPLIES
148897 RICHARD YOUNG PRODUCTS $660.90 INSTRUMENT PARTS
148898 ZYMARK CORP. $851.23 LIB EOUIPMENT
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 12/13195 $2.702,335.85
FUND NO 9199 . JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE IV08195 PAGE 7
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 1211395 POSTING DATE 12/13/95
SUMMARY AMOUNT
91 OPER FUND $560.60
92 OPER FUND $5.402.00
92 CAP FAC FUND $25.170.81
43 OPER FUND $41.851.11
#3 CAP FAC FUND $146,377.25
#5 OPER FUND $4,801.27
46 OPER FUND $161.60
07 OPER FUND $8,690.32
97 CAP FAC FUND $470,800.72
941 OPER FUND $288.00
m 911 CAP FAC FUND $304.00
x 914 CAP FAC FUND $15.95
8586 OPER FUND $2,319.55
9586 CAP FAC FUND 5276,112A3
--1 0667 OPER FUND $2.042.89
Y7814 OPER FUND $6.707.57
C'1 JT OPER FUND $775.555.24
V CORF 6393,437.92
SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $69,736.67
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $471,937.47
62,7D2,335.85
FUND NO 910 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1221R5 PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 1227195 POSTING DATE 1227195
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
148920 AG TECH COMPANY $63.227.33 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.OAD-9-91
148921 ASL CONSULTING ENGINEERS $1.028.74 ATWOOD SUBTRUNCK PLAN PREPERATION
148922 ACORN CONSULTING $5,070.00 CONSULTING SERVICES
148923 AIR LIQUIDE AMERICA CORP. $289.42 SPECIALTY GASSES
148924 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $10,322.00 O&M AGREEMENT OXYGEN.SYST.M.O.8-M9
148925 ALAMO MOTOR LODGE 5534.91 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148926 ALL METALS PROCESSING $1,243.29 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148927 ALUMINUM FORGE CO $1,008.11 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148928 AMERIDATA $1.588.19 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
148929 AMERICAN AIRLINES 54,149.88 TRAVEL SERVICES
148930 AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION $210.00 SEMINAR-VIDEOTAPE
148931 AMERICAN SIGMA $5,682.76 MISCELLANEOUS HARDWARE
m 148932 AMER.SOCIETY FOR MICROBIOLOGY $326.00 LAB SUPPLIES
X 148933 AMSCO ENERGY TRADING $121AB3.57 NATURAL GAS MO 6.28-95
148934 AMSCO $68.12 SERVICE AGREEMENT
148935 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL $990.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
� 148936 APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS,INC. $7,185.78 LAB SERVICES
C 148937 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) 52,633.11 PRINTER PARTS
1 148938 APPLIED ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS $3,000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
1- 148939 AQUATIC BIOASSAY&CONSULT $8,795.00 LABORATORY SERVICES
148940 ARMOR-VAC $522.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES
148941 ARROWHEAD ELECTRIC CORP. $346.71 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
148942 ARROWHEAD PURITAS WATERS $3,172.78 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148943 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. $60.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL
148944 AMSA $425.00 REGISTRATION
140945 ATLANTIC ENERGY SERVICE $8,993.00 GENERATOR REPAIR
148946 BFI MEDICAL WASTE SYSTEMS $87.80 WASTE DISPOSAL
148947 BANANA BLUEPRINT $2.687.24 PRINTING M.O.11-07-94
148948 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $470.91 BATTERIES
148949 BAXTER EDWARDS $1.399.09 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148950 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS.INC. 53,605.00 LAB SUPPLIES
148951 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $274.65 TRUCK WASH TICKETS
148952 BEAR STATE PUMP&EQUIPMENT $79.10 PUMP PARTS
148953 BECKMAN INDUSTRIAL $1,649.34 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148954 BEST WESTERN PLAZA INT.INN $911.62 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148955 BEV CUSTER 513.00 PUBLICATIONS
148956 BLACK PROGRESS REVIEW 5395.00 MESSAGE OF SUPPORT
148957 BLACKWELL WISSENSCHAFT 5203.00 PUBLICATION
148958 BLOOMBERG L.P. $4,919.22 FINANCIAL MONITORING M.O.4-14-93
148959 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $27.243.80 ENGINEERING SERVICES MO 2-9-94&MO 9-27-95
148960 BREA COMMUNITY HOSPITAL $1.082.48 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148961 BUDGET INN $242.11 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148962 BUDGET JANITORIAL $4,329.50 JANITORIAL SERVICES MO 1-12-94
148963 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. $112.06 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
148964 BUSH&ASSOCIATES,INC. $7.298.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.641-94
148965 CCI TECHNOLOGIES $826.84 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
FUND NO D199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1221/95 PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 1227/95 POSTING DATE 1227/95
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
148966 CEM CORPORATION $185.48 LAB SUPPLIES
148967 CS COMPANY $4,175.98 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
148958 CALTROL,INC. $1.348.50 HARDWARE
148969 CALIF ASSOC.OF SAN.AGENCIES $330.00 REGISTRATION
148970 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $977.58 SERVICE AGREEMENT
148971 CALTEX PLASTICS,INC. $1,490.00 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
148972 CAMAU CORP. $1.255.10 SERVICE AGREEMENT
148973 CANNON EQUIPMENT WEST INC $137.60 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148974 CANUS CORPORATION $377.10 FIBER OPTIC CABLE
148975 CARLETON ENGINEERS $390.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES-AIR QUALITY
148976 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $48.553.70 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-36&P242
148977 CATALINA CYLINDERS $1,634.62 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
X 148978 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $580.61 OFFICE FURNITURE
= 148979 CENTURY SAFETY INST.&SUPPLY $8,336.01 SAFETY SUPPLIES
148980 CERADYNEINC $457.87 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148961 CHEM SERVICE INC. $215.74 LAB SUPPLIES
-4 146982 CLEMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL $20,773.86 CONSULTANT-LANDFILL PROJECT MO 7-31-95
148983 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $466.20 SERVICE AGREEMENT
I� 148964 COCO'SC127 $125.20 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
N 148985 COUCH&SONS $95,866.00 CONSTRUCTION IIA7-1
148986 COMBYTE USA INC. $3.775.44 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
148987 CONNELL GM PARTS 7 DIV. $122.43 TRUCK PARTS
148988 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $2.187.65 ELECTRIC PARTS
14BD89 CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS $595.53 FREIGHT
148990 CONTEMPO COIN LAUNDRY $150.20 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148991 CONTINENTAL EQUIPMENT&SUPPLY $332.98 TOOLS -
148992 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $4.175.15 ENGINE PARTS
148993 COSMOTRONIC $398.49 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148994 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY &221.25 TRUCK PARTS
148995 COUNTERPART ENTERPRISES $123A7 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
148996 COUNTY INVESTMENTS II S125.20 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148997 COUNTY CLERK $25.00 EXEMPTION FEE
148998 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $810.19 ELECTRIC PARTS
148999 CRAZY SHIRTS INC. $1.059.31 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149000 CHARLES P.CROWLEY.CO. $588.01 INSTRUMENT PARTS
149001 SWRCB/SW FEES 81Q00O00 ANNUAL FEE-WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS
149002 SWRBC/BPTCP FEES 311,000.00 ANNUAL FEE-BAT PROTECTION&TOXIC CLEANUP
149003 DAMES&MOORE $8.000.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES
149004 NA D'ARCY COMPANY $7,953.40 LAB SUPPLIES
149005 DE LE JON ENTERPRISES $191.65 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149D0S DELL COMPUTER CORP $212.727.60 COMPUTERS
149007 DEPT OF MOTOR VEHICLES $12.00 DMV RENEWAL
149008 DERLANINC. $2.206.68 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149009 THE DIAMOND GROUP $4,000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
149010 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $21,101.04 SERVICE AGREEMENTS
149011 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $793.30 PAINT SUPPLIES
FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE IMV95 PAGES
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 1227/95 POSTING DATE 1227195
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
149012 DUALS SALES $382AS FITTINGS
149013 ESP NORTH $1,654.45 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
149014 ECOANALYSIS,INC. $1.950.50 CONSULTING SERVICES
149015 ECOSYSTEMS EN'G B ANALYSIS $11,739.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
149016 ELECT AIR TOOL CO $205.45 MECHANICAL PARTS
149017 ENCHANTER,INC. $3,500.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5.24-95
149018 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $21.97 FILTERS
149019 FIRST CHOICE $1,303.90 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT
149020 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $1,281.88 LAB SUPPLIES
149021 FISIONS INSTRUMENTS $98.93 SERVICE AGREEMENT
149022 FLICKINGER CO $1,615.11 VALVE
149023 FORD SAUVAJOT MANAGEMENT GROUP $1,995.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
T71 149024 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $71.56 PHOTO SUPPLIES
X 149025 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $725.30 PAINT SUPPLIES
._.� 149026 FRYS ELECTRONICS $403.48 ELECTRONIC B COMPUTER SUPPLIES
Cd 149027 FUJI TRU COLOR INC. $321.12 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149028 GMF SOUND INC $29.40 ELECTRIC PARTS
C7 149029 GST,INC. $11,309.77 OFFICE SUPPLIES
149030 GARDEN GROVE COMMUNITY CHURCH $1,724.04 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
W 149031 GEMINI INDUSTRIES $1,152.42 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149032 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $3.989.07 ELECTRIC PARTS
149033 GENERAL OCEANICS,INC. $250.00 LAB SERVICES
149034 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $7,649.79 TELEPHONE SERVICES
149036 GERARD TILE CO.USA $4.077.41 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149036 GIERLICH-MRCHELL,INC. $171.09 PUMP PARTS
149037 GOVT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOC. $50.00 AWARD FEE
149038 GOVERNMENT INSTITUTES INC $955.00 PUBLICATIONS
149039 GRAPHIC CONTROLS $235.46 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
149D40 GRASSY S.T.I. $3.096-51 ENGINE PARTS
149041 DGA CONSULTANTS $8.748.21 SURVEYING SERVICES M08.23-958 MO 6894
149042 DAVID R.GRIFFIN $117.774.55 LEGAL SERVICES-TECHITE PIPE M.0.9-14-94
149043 GULLWER'S INC. $410.78 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149044 GUNTHER ATHLETIC SERVICE $100.70 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
14SO45 GEORGE T.HALL CO. $1,157.16 ELECTRIC PARTS
149046 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $1.356.14 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
149047 HATCH 8 KIRK,INC. $3.904.24 TRUCK PARTS
149048 HAWKINS ASSOCIATES $1.262.72 LAB EQUIPMENT
149049 PL HAWN CO,INC. $27.91 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
149050 HEALTH SCIENCE ASSOCIATES $1,750.0D PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
149051 HILTI,INC. $2,693.76 TOOLS
149052 HINCKLEY&SCHMITT $608.46 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149053 HOERSIGER CVS CALIF.,INC. $43.21 COMPRESSOR PARTS
149054 HOLIDAY SPA HEALTH CUWB $2,565.47 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149D55 HOME DEPOT $975.19 SMALL HARDWARE
149056 PIS HUGHES CO,INC. $607.02 PAINT SUPPLIES
149057 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO $2,009.25 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1221/95 PAGE 4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 1227/95 POSTING DATE 1227/95
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
149058 IPCO SAFETY $4.125.84 SAFETY SUPPLIES
149059 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $17.646.28 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.1 1-18-92
149060 INDUSTRIAL METAL SUPPLY CO. $956.48 STEEL
149061 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $157.12 CONNECTORS
149062 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. $71.61 TRUCK PARTS
149063 INORGANIC VENTURES $377.72 LAB SUPPLIES
149064 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $1,08T.06 BATTERIES
149065 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $7884 WATER USE
149066 IRVINE SCI-TECH BOOKS $52.47 PUBUCATIONS
149067 ISLANDER MOTEL $199.74 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149068 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $160,88 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
149069 JAYS CATERING $485.75 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE
m 149070 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $40.33 ELECTRIC PARTS
= 149071 JONES CHEMICALS,INC. $18.401.96 SODIUM HYPOCHLORI'TE MO4-26-95
149072 AMERICAN METAL BEARING CO $175.01 BEARINGS
b0 149073 KARS'ADVANCED MATERIALS,INC. $3,465.00 MACHINE TESTING
149074 KERRY CONSULTING GROUP $13.361.05 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MO II-15-95
149075 KIMMERLE BROS.INC. $/05.65 MECHANICAL PARTS
C7 149076 KING BEARING,INC. $719.28 MACHINE SUPPLIES
t 149077 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $6,625.39 TOOLS
149078 LA PAIMA INTER HOSPITAL $554.60 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149079 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY CO. $62.83 SAFETY SUPPLIES
14908D LAUNDERLAND $90.38 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149081 LAUNDERLAND $223.27 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149082 LAUNDERLAND $205.77 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149083 LEACH CORP $937.95 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149094 LEE B RO CONSULTING ENGR. $30.450.73 ENGINEERING SERVICES MO 5-I2-93812-6-93
1490B5 K.P.LINDSTROM,INC. $2,335.07 ENVUL CONSULTING SERVICES MO 12.9-90
149086 MPS $468.56 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
14SD87 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $6621986.00 CONSTRUCTION P1-36-2
149068 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $84.013.00 CONSTRUCTION P2A2-2
149089 IRVINE MARMOT HOTEL 53.487.36 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149M MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $335.61 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
149091 MES COMPANY $2.299.39 REPAIR
149092 MICEL INC $249.74 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149093 MIDWAY MFG.B MACHINING $4,518.56 MECHANICAL REPAIRS
149M MISSION INDUSTRIES $4,063.80 UNIFORM RENTALS
149095 MITCHELL INTERNATIONAL INC $533.36 PUBLICATIONS
149D95 MOBILE HOSE AND HYDRAULIC $427.16 PUMP PARTS
149D97 THE MOBILE STORAGE GROUP $2.614.45 CARGO CONTAINER
14909E MOTEL 6 R0034-01-05-C $521.94 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149099 MOTION INDUSTRIES,INC. $246.19 PUMP PARTS
149100 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $2,698.34 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
1491D1 NEWPORT HARBOR YACHT CLUB $117.17 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149102 NEWARK ELECTRONICS $173.85 INSTRUMENT PARTS
149103 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $260.00 UTILITY SERVICE CONNECTION
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1221I95 PAGE 5
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 1227I95 POSTING DATE 1227195
WARRANTNO. VENDOR AMOUNT
149104 NEWPORT CTR MEDICAL $243.95 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149105 NICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY $8,765.94 LUBRICANTSIDIESEL FUEL
149106 NORTEL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS 5442.00 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS
149107 O'BRIEN ENERGY SYSTEMS $39,883.66 AUTOMATE GENERATORS
149108 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $385.13 SAFETY GLASSES
149109 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $1.356.03 OFFICE SUPPLIES
149110 OFFICE PAVILIONSINTERIOR RESOURCES $103,393.89 OFFICE FURNITURE REPAIRS
149111 OLD SPAGHETTI FACTORY $574.17 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149112 OLYMPIC CONTROLS INC $89.95 REPAIR
149113 OMEGA CORPORATION $187.50 SECURITY SYSTEM REPAIRS
149114 ORANGE COUNTY FAIR&EXPO CTR $281.61 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
rn 149115 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $202.74 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
X 149116 ORANGE COURIER $222.75 COURIER SERVICES
= 149117 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. $496.69 FITTINGS
to 149118 ORRICK HERRINGTON&SUTCLIFFE $3,000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
W
1491 OXYGEN SERVICE $1, 6. SPECIALTY GASES
1d9120 20 COUNTY OF ORANGE $1 E75.0000 ADMINISTRATIVE FEES
C7 149121 PSSI $1,969.65 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION
149122 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $1.232.66 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
149123 PACIFIC PARTS $32.728.92 INSTRUMENT PARTS
149124 PACIFIC BELL $1,389.72 TELEPHONE SERVICES
149125 PAK WEST $62.56 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
149126 PARAGON CABLE $62.56 CABLE SERVICES
149127 PARKER HANNIFIN 02 $2,979.60 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149128 PARKHOUSE TIRE,INC. $830.55 TRUCK PARTS
149129 PARTS UNLIMITED $440.94 TRUCK PARTS
149130 R.F.PAULUS.INC. $15,175.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
149131 PEABODY $716.38 PUMP PARTS
149132 PEERLESS WIPING MATERIALS $721.93 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
149133 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $8,280.64 ROME.PETTY CASH,TRAINING&TRAVEL
149134 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $114,196.50 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3-29-95
149135 PINATA FOODS $2.736.41 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149136 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS $1.920.00 CONSULTING SERVICES
149137 PITNEY BOWES $1.778.00 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS
149138 POLY ENTERPRISES INC $996.69 SAFETY
149139 POLYMETRICS,INC. $1,262.75 LAB SUPPLIES
141M40 POLYPURE,INC. $27.950.04 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92
149141 POWER SYSTEMS TESTING CO. $1.249.00 ELECTRIC PARTS
149142 PROJECT MGMT INSTITUTE(PMI) $156.75 PUBLICATIONS
149143 PROMINENT FLUID CONTROL,INC. $799.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL
149144 PUBLIC FINANCIAL MGMT.,INC. $10.906.50 FINANCIAL CONSULTING SERVICES MO 7.31.95
149145 PRYOR REPORT $195.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING
149146 PUMPING SOLUTIONS $577.24 PUMP PARTS
149147 QUIP LAMINATES,INC. $1.387.82 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149148 QUESTRON CORP. $680.00 LAB SUPPLIES
149149 RD SYSTEMS $75.00 MONITOR REPAIR
FUND NO 9199 - H DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 12/21/95 PAGES
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 12/27/95 POSTING DATE 12/27/95
WARRANT NO.
149150 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $1,570.38 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS
149151 R&R INSTRUMENTS $83.35 ELECTRIC PARTS
149152 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO. $153.03 LAB SUPPLIES
149153 RAYNE WATER SYSTEMS E824.59 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149154 REBIS $1,811.73 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
149156 RED WING SHOES $113.78 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES
149156 REMEDYTEMP $962.37 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
149157 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $1,569.00 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
149158 RENOLD INC. $657.03 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
149159 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $622.53 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
149160 BASCO ELECTRIC $6.255.00 CONTRACT SERVICES
149161 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTL $82.779.65 OCEAN MONITORING NO 6-6-94&MO 6-29-95
m 149162 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $100.35 SPECIALTY GASES
X 149163 SCOTT WILLIAM J. $317.07 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
2 149164 SEA COAST DESIGNS $937.43 LAB SUPPLIES
tz 149165 CITY OF SEAL BEACH $376.60 WATER USE
149166 SELECTCIRCUITS 5801.46 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149167 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $792.40 TOOLS
p 149168 SHEPARD BROTHERS $540.76 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149169 SHURELUCK SALES $8.025.D5 TOOLS/HARDWARE
149170 SIEMON,LARSEN,&MARSH $6.497.08 CONTRACT SERVICE
149171 SMITH-EMERY CO. $912.00 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-13�94
149172 THE SMITH GROUP 55,213.00 CONTRACT SERVICE
149173 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. 545,782.30 POWER
149174 SO.CAL GAS.CO. $22.514.64 NATURAL GAS
149175 SOUTHWEST WHOLESALE NURSERY $19,650.00 CONTRACT SERVICE
149176 STAMEN Z SPASSOFF P.E. $12,000.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES
149177 SPICERS PAPER $91.29 OFFICE SUPPLIES
149178 STARNA CELLS,INC. $533.66 LAB SUPPLIES
149179 STATEK CORP $2.160.04 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149180 SUMMIT STEEL $962.64 METAL
149181 SUNSET ENVIRONMENTAL $1.207.14 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149182 SUPELCO,INC. $223.49 LAB SUPPLIES
149183 SUPER ICE CORP. $80.22 LAB SUPPLIES
149184 SUPER POWER PRODUCTS $517.20 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
149185 SUPER SOLDER SERVICES $110.71 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149186 SYSTEMS 81O INDUSTRIES INC. $104.68 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149181 SYMCAS $2.436.25 CONSULTANT
149188 TCH ASSOCIATES $3,292.22 LAB SUPPLIES
149189 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $1.002.62 ELECTRIC CART PARTS
149190 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $701.31 MECHANICAL PARTS
149191 TIME MOTION TOOLS $86.76 TOOLS
149192 TOLO INC 5555.23 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149193 TONYS LOCK&SAFE SERVICE $167.95 LOCKS&KEYS
149194 TRAFFIC CONTROL ENGINEERING $1,440.00 ENGINEERING SERVICE
149195 TRISTAR $220.21 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE IMI/95 PAGE 7
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 12/27/95 POSTING DATE 12/27/95
WARRANT NO. VENDOR
149196 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $260.04 TRUCK PARTS
149197 TRUCK PARTS SUPPLY $28.11 TRUCK PARTS
149198 TRUESDAIL LABS $65.00 LAB SERVICES
149199 JG TUCKER S SON,INC. $4,669.35 INSTRUMENT PARTS
149200 TUSTIN DODGE $123.85 TRUCK PARTS
149201 TWINING LABORATORIES $13,595.07 S0IL TESTING M.O.7-13-94
149202 U.S.AUTO GLASS CENTERS $29.95 TRUCK PARTS
149203 US POSTAL SERVICE $132.41 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149204 US POSTAL SERVICE $143.23 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149205 US POSTAL SERVICE $130.29 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149206 USPOSTALSERVICE $448.20 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149207 UNIS0URCEWOR BUTLER PAPER $336.40 OFFICE SUPPLIES
149208 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $583.33 PARCEL SERVICES
Rl 149209 VWR SCIENTIFIC 5443.53 LAB SUPPLIES
= 149210 VAUN CORPORATION $644.09 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
'--' 149211 VILLAGE NURSERIES $43.08 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES
to
149212 VORTEX INDUSTRIES 5325.24 BUILDING REPAIRS
-1 149213 WACKENHUT CORP. $7,193.76 CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS
rj 149214 WARNER CENTER ASSOCIATION $204.57 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
1 149215 WARRINGTON $17.50 SERVICE AGREEMENT
V 149216 WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION $1.473.68 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT COURSES
149217 WECO INDUSTRIES,INC. $13.954.40 CHEMICALS
149218 WESTERN SKIES MOBILE HOME PARK $250.84 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149219 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $17.665.35 CAUSTIC SODA MO 8-23-95
149220 WESTERN SWITCHES $65.40 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
149221 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $232.20 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
149222 WESCO $2.386.30 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
149223 JUDITH A.OLSON $72.54 REIMBURSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE
149224 WINONICS(BREA) $237.60 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149225 WOLFE AND ASSOCIATES,INC. $1.305.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
149226 ROURKE,WOODRUFF&SPRADLIN $76.348.05 LEGAL SERVICES MO 7.26-95
149227 XEROX CORP. $195.05 COPIER LEASES
149228 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $715.83 LAB SUPPLIES
149229 ZYMARK CORP. $179.14 LAB EQUIPMENT
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 12/27/95 $2,628,999.39
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1221/95 PAGES
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 1227195 POSTING DATE 1227/95
SUMMARY AMOUNT
#1 OPER FUND $3,000.00
#2 OPER FUND $84.76
#2 CAP FAC FUND $1,028.74
#3 OPER FUND $18,259.97
#3 CAP FAC FUND $129.533.26
#5 OPER FUND $648.54
#6 CAP FAC FUND $62.31
#7 OPER FUND $2.598.94
97 CAP FAC FUND $40,020.76
#11 OPER FUND $11,119.84
rn X #11 CAP FAC FUND $97,260.00
_ #14 OPER FUND $291.50
.-� 014 CAP FAC FUND $19.650.00
---
#586 OPER FUND $16.75
--I #588 CAP FAC FUND E25,585.05
I7 #687 OPER FUND $211.28
1 #78140PER FUND $15.83
00 JT OPER FUND $747,037.33
CORF $1,311,228.69
SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $9,225.20
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $212.140.44
$2,628,999.39
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 01/05196 PAGE1
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 01/10/96 POSTING DATE 01/10/96
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
149258 AGTECHCOMPANY $59,271.65 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10.9.91
149259 ARK TECHNOLOGIES $6,000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
149260 A-Z LOGIC SYSTEMS $66.80 LAB SUPPLIES
149261 ACORN CONSULTING $2,795.00 CONSULTING SERVICES
149262 AIR COLD SUPPLY,INC. $29.21 AIR CONDITIONER REPAIRS
149263 AIR PRODUCTS B CHEMICALS $18.322.00 08M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.O.8-9-09
149264 ALADDIN HOUSE $623.90 WINDOWBUNDS
149265 AMERIDATA $4.851.11 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
149266 AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION $320.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
149267 ANIXTER-DISTRIBUTION $722.58 COMPUTER SUPPLIES
149268 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $1,714.01 NOTICES 8 ADS
149269 APPLE ONE $704.00 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
m 149270 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $37,523.94 COMPUTER PARTS
X 149271 ARROWHEAD ELECTRIC CORP. $236.32 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
s 149272 E S BABCOCK 8 SONS INC $1,110.00 LAB ANALYSIS
149273 BANK OF AMERICA $393.42 BANKING CHARGES
.. 149274 BARNES 8 NOBLE BOOKS $800.00 TECHNICAL PUBLICATIONS
149275 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $1.016.00 BATTERIES
m 149276 BAUER COMPRESSOR $8.020.30 COMPRESSOR PARTS
1 1492" BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $4,213.99 LAB SUPPLIES
F-+ 149278 BEAR STATE PUMP 8 EQUIPMENT $108.21 PUMP PARTS
149279 A BIEDERMAN INC $944.81 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
149280 BIO-GRO DIVISION 542,435.61 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 4-26-95
149281 BONA-RUES $140.18 TRUCK PARTS
149292 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $13,2D8.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES MO 1-12-94
149283 BNI BOOKS $869.51 BOOKS
149284 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH INC. $206.84 LAB SUPPLIES
149285 CALTROL,INC. $574.56 HARDWARE
149286 CALIF ASSOC.OF SAN.AGENCIES $495.00 REGISTRATION
149287 CALTEX PLASTICS,INC. $228.40 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
149288 CAMALI CORP. $400.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
149289 CANUS CORPORATION $54.641.10 FIBER OPTIC CABLE
149290 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $21,574.15 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-33.2,PI-38&P2.43
149291 CASIRUSCOINC. $605.06 SAFETY SUPPLIES
149292 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $1.214.79 OFFICE FURNITURE
149293 CERFNET $37.40 COMPUTER SERVICES
149294 CHEMWEST INC. $5.00 REFUND MAIL FEES
149295 CLARKE CONTRACTING CO $42,682.50 CONSTRUCTION 7-04-2
149296 COUCH AND SONS $68.796.90 CONSTRUCTION M-044
149297 COUCH B SONS $122,640.00 CONSTRUCTION 11A7.1
149298 COMMUNICATION DEV.ASSOC. $2,250.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
149299 COMMUNICATIONS PERFORMANCE GROUP $17,850.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
149300 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $2.639.88 PUMP PARTS
149301 COMPUSERVE $166.13 COMPUTER SERVICES
149302 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $2.469.09 ELECTRIC PARTS
149303 CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS $131.33 FREIGHT
FUND NO 9199 IT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 01105199 PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER M43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 01/10M POSTING DATE 01/10/96
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
149304 CONTINENTAL LAB PRODUCTS INC. $3.088.81 LAB SUPPLIES
149305 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $951.71 ENGINE PARTS
149306 CHARLES P.CROWLEY,CO. $19.08 INSTRUMENT PARTS
149307 DAVE'S BICYCLES,INC. 53N.22 BIKE REPAIRS
149308 DELL COMPUTER CORP. SM.100.32 COMPUTER PARTS
149309 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $6,941.49 ANALYST
149310 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $1.035.69 PAINT SUPPLIES
149311 DUALS SALES $282.49 FITTINGS
149312 E.C.S. 8344.00 PUBLICATIONS
149313 ESP NORTH $473.17 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
149314 EASTMAN.INC. $3,265.49 OFFICE SUPPLIES
149315 EDWARDS HIGH VACUUM INTER $134.88 LAB SUPPLIES
149316 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $867.70 LAB SERVICES
m 149317 FMC CORPORATION $91,487.40 HYDROGEN PEROXIDE MO 9.14-94
= 149318 FASTFRAME OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $139.00 AWARDS FRAMING
^-' 149319 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $220.70 AIR FREIGHT
149320 FILTERLINE CORP. $613.25 FILTERS
'-4 149321 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $257.54 FILTERS
Rl 149322 FIRST CO B/OR NORTHERN DIST. $525.99 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
1 149323 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $943.10 LAB SUPPLIES
N 149324 FISONS INSTRUMENTS $11,772.61 LAB SOFTWARE LICENSES
149325 CUFFORDA FORKERT 78,14&50 SURVEYING SERVICES MO 64495
149326 FRY'S ELECTRONICS $394.14 ELECTRONIC 8 COMPUTER SUPPLIES
149327 GST,INC. $18.680.59 OFFICE SUPPLIES
149328 GARRATT-CALIAHAN COMPANY $71.12 CHEMICALS
149329 GAUGE REPAIR SERVICE $368.58 INSTRUMENT PARTS
149330 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $137.87 ELECTRIC PARTS
149331 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1,124.81 TELEPHONE SERVICES
149332 GIERLICH-MITCHELL,INC. $8.366.81 PUMP PARTS
149333 GOV'T CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENT $250.00 REGISTRATION
149334 WAN GRAINGER.INC. $191.24 COMPRESSOR PARTS
149335 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $422.08 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
149338 GRASSY S.T.I. $4,282.76 ENGINE PARTS
149337 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC WHOLESALE $456.89 PLANT AUTOMATION
149336 DGA CONSULTANTS $18,617.15 SURVEYING SERVICES MO 8.23.958 MO 6-&94
149339 HACH COMPANY $1,077.84 LAB SUPPLIES
149340 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $1.480.00 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
149341 WATCH 8 KIRK,INC. $1.265.99 TRUCK PARTS
149342 PL HAWN CO,INC. $878.40 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
149343 HELPMATES PERSONNEL SERVICES $802.56 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
149344 VICKI HESTON PERSONNEL SERVICE $8,384.42 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
149345 HILTI,INC. $1,664.08 TOOLS
149346 HOERBIGER CVS CALIF.,INC. $271.92 COMPRESSOR PARTS
149347 HOLMES B NARVER,INC. 319,585AI ENGINEERING SERVICES2-14-5112 M09-14-94
149348 HOME DEPOT $365.16 SMALL HARDWARE
149349 SOUTHWEST SCIENTIFIC,INC. $1,480.49 METER PARTS
FUND NO 9199 - IT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 01/05/96 PAGE 3
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 01l10l96 POSTING DATE 01110M
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
14935D RS HUGHES CO,INC. $1.073.50 PAINT SUPPLIES
149351 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $18,639.75 WATER USE
149352 HYCLONE LABORATORIES INC. $910.66 LAB SUPPLIES
149353 HYDROTEX INC. $1,532.15 TRANSMISSION FLUID
149354 IPCO SAFETY $1.435.91 SAFETY SUPPLIES
149355 INDUSTRIAL STEAM $1,393.38 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
149356 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $5.54 WATER USE
149357 JAMISON ENGINEERING $8,361.90 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
149356 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $836.57 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
149359 JAY'S CATERING $461.54 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE
149360 JOBS AVAILABLE 9170.00 NOTICES B ADS
149361 JOHNSON CONTROLS INC. $956.32 ELECTRIC PARTS
m 149362 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $825.13 ELECTRIC PARTS
X 149363 JONES CHEMICALS,INC. $4,992.76 SODIUM 14YPOCHLORITE MO4-2&95
149364 KALLEEN'S COMPUTER PRODUCTS $331.50 COMPUTER SUPPLIES
W 149366 FRANCES L.KALUZNY $1,320.00 HUMAN RESOURCES CONSULTANT
149365 KEMIRON PACIFIC,INC. $66.867.24 FERRIC CHLORIDE M09-27-95
149367 KING BEARING,INC. $984.51 MACHINE SUPPLIES
m 149360 KLEINFELDER $194.85 GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTING SERVICES
IN 149369 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $6.970.00 TOOLS
149370 LEADERSHIP DIRECTORIES INC. $620.25 SUBSCRIPTIONS
149371 LEE 8 RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC. $4.582.08 ENGINEERING SERVICES
149372 LEWCO ELECTRIC $162.19 TRUCK PARTS
149373 SOCO-LYNCH CORP. $537.03 JANITORIAL SERVICES
149374 MEC ANALYTICAL SYSTEMS INC. $9,968.00 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING
149375 MPS $926.22 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
149376 MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY CORP. $887.22 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
149377 MARATHON ELECTRIC $745.05 ELECTRIC PARTS
149378 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $399.25 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
149379 MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. $732.56 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
149380 MIDWAY MFG.8 MACHINING $875.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS
149381 MISSION INDUSTRIES $2.379.41 UNIFORM RENTALS
149382 MORTON SALT $1,042.22 SALT
149383 MOTION INDUSTRIES,INC. $227.25 PUMP PARTS
149384 NATIONAL INFORMATION DATA $503.95 PUBLICATION
149385 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $82.11 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
1493M NEWARK ELECTRONICS $58.69 INSTRUMENT PARTS
149387 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $40.58 WATER USE
149388 91 EXPRESS LANES $970.00 TRANSPONDERS 8 DEPOSIT
149389 OFFICIAL AIRLINE GUIDE $549.80 SUBSCRIPTIONS
149390 OLSTEN STAFFING SERVICES $3.472.00 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
149391 ON-LINE EKECTRONICS $83.80 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
149392 ON TECHNOLOGY 360740 SOFTWARE
149393 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $339.27 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES '
149394 ORANGE COURIER $89.10 COURIER SERVICES
149395 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. $1,208.19 FITTINGS
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 01105196 PAGE 4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 01/10196 POSTING DATE 01/10/96
WARRANT NO, VENDOR AMOUNT
149396 OXYGEN SERVICE $1,281.88 SPECIALTY GASES
149397 COUNTY OF ORANGE $60.00 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICE FEES
149398 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $18.647.75 WORKERS COMP REIMBURSEMENT
149399 COUNTY OF ORANGE $238BD INSPECTION LABOR
149400 PACIFIC PARTS $63,598.08 INSTRUMENT PARTS
149401 PACIFIC BELL $15.66 TELEPHONE SERVICES
149402 PAINEWEBBER $61.394.69 COP REMARKETING FEES
149403 PARAGON CABLE $36.78 CABLE SERVICES
14MN COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $2,240.41 REIMB.PETTY CASH,TRAINING&TRAVEL
149405 PHOTRON USA $917.27 LAB SUPPLIES
149406 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $104,986.80 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3-29-95
149407 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS $19,433.31 CONSULTING SERVICE
m 149408 POLYPURE,INC. $23.376.47 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3.11-92
X 149409 POWER DESIGN $943.90 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS
z 149410 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $112.00 ICE FOR SAMPLES
w 149411 PUMPING SOLUTIONS INC $808.90 PUMPS
149412 PUTZMEISTER,INC. $647.97 PUMP PARTS
149413 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $154 96 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS
Rl 149414 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $2.062.75 TRASH REMOVAL
r
149415 RED WING SHOES $282.74 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES
149418 REMEDY TEMP E2,875.32 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
149417 RM MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL ANDIOR RRTAL $261.14 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
149418 RODNEY-HUNT CO $8,264.43 HEADWORKS REPAIR
149419 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $847.56 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
149420 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $196.05 TOOLS
149421 SHURELUCK SALES $5,363.81 TOOLS/HARDWARE
149422 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO. $197.84 LAB SUPPLIES
149423 SO COAST AIR QUALITY $15,65C92 PERMIT FEES
149424 SOUTH COAST WATER $160.00 LAB SUPPLIES
149425 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. $61.180.65 POWER
149426 SO.CALIFORNIA MARINE INST. $800.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
149427 STANG INDUSTRIAL PRODS. $638.66 HARDWARE
149428 STARRA CELLS,INC. $973.86 LAB SUPPLIES
149429 STATE STREET BANK $4,842.92 COP TRUSTEE SERVICES
149430 SUNSET INDUSTRIAL PARTS $271.87 PUMP PARTS
149431 SUPELCO,INC. $223.41 LAB SUPPLIES
149432 SUPER CHEM CORP. $1,338.85 CHEMICALS
149433 SUPER POWER PRODUCTS $362.04 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
149434 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $98.39 ELECTRIC CART PARTS
149435 TECHNOMIC PUBLISHING CO. $292.00 PUBLICATIONS
149436 TELEDYNE ANALYTICAL $3,566.92 INSTRUMENT PARTS
149437 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $569.89 MECHANICAL PARTS
149438 TONYS LOCK&SAFE SERVICE $198.96 LOCKS&KEYS
149439 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $165AI TRUCK PARTS
149440 TRUCK PARTS SUPPLY $224.43 TRUCK PARTS
149441 JG TUCKER B SON,INC. $11,234.19 INSTRUMENT PARTS
FUND NO 9199 - H DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 01/05IN PAGES
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 01110/96 POSTING DATE 01I10196
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
149442 UNISOURCEWOR BUTLER PAPER $1,076.26 OFFICE SUPPLIES
149443 VWR SCIENTIFIC $524.97 LAB SUPPLIES
149444 VARIAN ASSOCIATES INC $643.96 LAB SUPPLIES
149446 VOSSLER B COMPANY $266.63 VALVE PARTS
149446 WACKENHUT CORP. $8,996.51 CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS
149447 WAL-CON CONSTRUCTION CO. $78,194AI CONSTRUCTION 6-37-3
149448 WAXIE $2.051.99 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
149449 WECO INDUSTRIES,INC. $14.083.16 CHEMICAL SUPPLIES
149450 WEST COAST INSTRUMENTS -$247.46 GAUGE
149451 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $20.907.15 CAUSTIC SODA MO 8.23-95
149452 WEST-UTE SUPPLY CO. $3.547.66 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
149453 WESCO $441.10 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
149454 JUDITH A.WILSON $89.09 REIMBURSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE
m 149455 XEROX CORP. 5994.02 COPIER LEASES
X 149456 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $91329 LAB SUPPLIES
.s.., 149457 JOHNSON YOKOGAWA CORP. 52,635.99 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
CV
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID IIIGM8 $1,510,W8.32
m
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 01/05196 PAGES
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 01MOM POSTING DATE 01110MS
SUMMARY AMOUNT
#1 OPER FUND $1,469.38
#1 CONSTR FUND $8.069.26
#2 OPER FUND $6.426.02
#2 CAP FAC FUND $19.585.61
#2 CONSTR FUND $20.620.74
#3 OPER FUND $48,363.12
#3 CAP FAC FUND $2.820.00
93 CONSTR FUND $18.782.13
05 OPER FUND $13,657.87
#5 CONSTR FUND $4,350.51
#6 OPER FUND $374.37
fTt #6 CONSTR FUND $2,218.96
X 07 OPER FUND $3.893.57
2 #7 CAP FAC FUND $42,700.00
W #7 CONSTR FUND $4.079.87
#11 OPER FUND $1,371.72
--1 #11 CAP FAC FUND $126,302.73
m #11 CONSTR FUND $2.749.26
1 #13 OPEN FUND $78.60
#13 CONSTR FUND $76.15
#14 CAP FAC FUND $17.60
#14 CONSTR FUND $447.92
9586 OPER FUND $2,653.22
#596 CAP FAC FUND $78.194.11
#687 OPER FUND $1.960.71
#7814 OPER FUND $5.169.95
H OPER FUND $590,252.64
CORP $200.472.07
SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $18.647.75
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $225.832.68
$1,510,838.32
COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14
OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
MINUTES
STRATEGIC PLANNING WORKSHOP
JANUARY 27, 1996
RICTS OFp9gd
rs
a c
z �
� a
cI�NO THE
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018
ROLL CALL
A Strategic Planning Workshop of Me Boards of Directors of County Samollon Districts Nos.1,2,3,
5,6,7,11.13 and 14 of Orange County,California,was hold on January 27,1996.at 9:00 am.,In the
DisMM'Adminis"tve Offices. Following Me Pledge of Alleglence and Mvecallon Me roll was called and
Me Secretary reported a Quorum present for DWricts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7,13.and 14 as follows:
ACTT E ALTERNATE
DIRECTORS DIRECTORS
DISTRICT NO.1: _x Pal McGuigan,Chair _ Tad R.Moreno
x James M.Ferryman,Chair pro tam Arthur Perry
x Mark A,Murphy _ Joanne Coon2
Thomas R.Seherelll Jim Polls
Roper Stanton 3_ Wil6em G.Steiner
DISTRICT NO.2: x John Collins,Chair _ George Soon
�. Daniel T.Welch,Chair pro tam John M.Gullocion
x Barry Derres _ Bob Bell
x Bumle Dunlap _ Glenn Parker
x Norman Z.Eckenroda Carol Downey
x James H.Flora Slew Anderson
x Pal McGuigan Ted R.Moreno
g Mark A.Murphy Joanne Coonh
Chns No" _L Dan Bankhead
x Shedon Singer George L.Mount
Roger Stanton x William G.Steiner
_a Bob Zemel _ Tom Daly
DISTRICT NO.3: g Sal A.Sapien,Chair Harry M.Dotson
_x Sumle Dunlap,Chair pro tam Glenn Parker
_a Waller Bowman Gall Kerry
x George Brown Madlyn Bruce HasEng6
x John Collins George Soon
x James H.Flora _ Steve Anderson
x Don R.Griffin Pelsy Marshall
a Vision Leipzig Ralph Bauer
x Wally Linn E.G.Miner
x Pat McGuigan Ted R.Morena
CMfa Norby _x Don Bankhead
_x Margie L.Rice _ James V.Ewns
x Sheldon Singer George L.Zlaket
Roger Wanton _x Wiliam G.Steiner
_a Chad"Sylvia Robert Wahabom
a Bob Zonal _ Tom Daly
DISTRICT NO.5: x Jan Debay,Chair John C.Cox.Jr.
x Wiliam G.Stainer,Chair pro tam _ Roger Stanton
x John C.Cox,Jr. Jan Dabey
DISTRICT NO.6: x James M.Ferrymen,Chair AM.,Perry
_x Jan Debay.Chair pro tam _ John C.Cox,Jr.
x William G.Steiner Roper Wanton
DISTRICT NO.7: a Barry Hammond,Chair Mke Ward
a Thomas R.Seharelti Jim Pots
_x Jan Debey _ John C.Co.,Jr.
x James M.Ferrymen,Chair pro tam _ Arthur Perry
x Pet McGuigan _ Ted R.Moreno
x Mark A.Murphy Joanne Coon
x William G.Steiner Roper Mention
DISTRICT NO.11: a Victor Leipzig,Chair Ralph Bauer
_.a Shiley Dettloff,Chair pro tam Ralph Bauer
Roper Stanton x William G.Steiner
DISTRICT NO.13: x Jahn M.GUII®on,Clal Daniel T Welch
a Bob Zemel,Chair pro tam _ Tom Daly
x Burns Dunlap Glenn Parker
x Me*A.Murphy Joanne Coomz
_x William G.Steiner Roger Clanton
DISTRICT NO.14: a Thomas R.Sagerelll,Chair Jim Poll
x Mark A.Murphy,Chair pro tam _ Joanne ComR
a Barry Hammond _ Mks Wand
x_ William G.Steiner Roger Stanton
i Peer A Swan _ Danel Wier
2
01/27/96
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Don McIntyre, General Manager, Blake P. Anderson,
Assistant General Manager- Operations, Judith A.
Wilson, Assistant General Manager-Administration,
Penny Kyle, Board Secretary, Tom Dawes, Gary
Hasenstab, Irwin Haydock, Ed Hodges, Steve Kozak,
David Ludwin, Patrick McNally, Greg Mathews, Bob
Ooten, Mike Moore, George Robertson, Gary Streed,
Michelle Tuchman, Nancy Wheatley, Mike White
OTHERS PRESENT: Jerry King, George Zlaket, Alternate Director,
Harry M. Dotson, Alternate Director, Mary Lee,
Gail P. Lynch, John Bushman, Don Schulz, Sam Kelly,
Nancy Gardner, Bob Caustin, Lindell Marsh, Larry
Porter, John D. Knoll, Jr., Chris Crometon, Bill
Whittenberg, Bob Finn
DISTRICT 7
Appointment of Chair pro tern
In the absence of Chair Barry Hammond and Chair pro tem Thomas R. Saltarelli,
Director James M. Ferryman was appointed Chair pro tem of District No. 7.
DISTRICT 11
Adiournment of meeting due to lack
ofguorurn
This 27th day of January, 1996, at 9:00 a.m., being the time and place for the
Strategic Planning Workshop of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
No. 11 of Orange County, California, and there not being a quorum present in
District No. 11, the meeting of said District was thereupon adjourned by the
Secretary.
DISTRICTS 1, 2, 3. 5. 6. 7. 13 & 14
Strategic Planning Program
Joint Chair Cox welcomed all who attended the first quarterly Strategic Planning
Workshop and gave a brief summary of what would be covered in the presentation.
Jerry King of the Regional Water Quality Control Board was then introduced. He
reviewed critical policy issues facing the Districts and his view from a regional
perspective. Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager of Operations, gave a
historical perspective report; Judy Wilson, Assistant General Manager of
Administration, spoke on demographic issues; Nancy Wheatley, Director of
Technical Services, reported on the 301(h) waiver; Dave Ludwin, Director of
Engineering, spoke on the Strategic Plan overview; and, Don McIntyre, General
Manager, spoke on strategic and policy issues.
3
`v
COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS. 1 , 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 , 13 AND 14
OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
MINUTES
ADJOURNED MEETING
FEBRUARY 14, 1996
%Us 0F�9q?
G
> Z
2 K
V �
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018
ROLL CALL
An adjourned meeting of Me Boards of Directions of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1.2,3,
5,6, 7. 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California,was held on Febmary 14, 1996,at 7:30 p.m.,in
the Districts'Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll Was
called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2. 3, 5, 6, 7. 11, 13.and 14
as follows:
ACTME ALTERNATE
DIRECTORS DIRECTORS
DISTRICT NO.1: a Pat McGuigan, Clair _ Ted R.Moreno
James M.Ferryman,Clair pro tern _ Amur Perry
y Mark A.Murphy _ Joarme Coon
1 Thomas R.Si Jim Potts
y Roper Sermon William G.Steiner
DISTRICT NO.2: i John C4IIim, Cair George Scott
DBNd T.Welch.Clair pro tam x Jolm M.Gdlixsan
Z Bury Danes Bob Bell
Z BlvNe Dunlop Glenn Ranter
Norman Z. Eckenmdo Carol Downey
_L James H. Ron Stove Anderson
i Pat McGuigan Ted R.Menem
Mark A.Murphy Joanne Co.
Chris Neoy Dan BankMad
�. Sheldon Singer Geinya L Zlaket
i Raper Sermon Wgiam B.Stainer
J_ Bob 2em0 _ Tom Daly
MUM=NO,3: Sal A.Sapien,Clair Harry M.Dorton
3� Burnie D o,Chair pro tem Glenn Pukor
Z Walter Bowman Gail Kern/
Z George Brown Marilyn Bruce Hamirgs
Z John Collis George Soon
x James H.Fba Steva Anderson
Don R.Griffin Peery Marshall
Z Victor temple Ralph Bauer
Z Wally Linn Ea G.Miner
y Per McGuigan _ To K Moreno
_I_ Chris honey Don BBNuhoBd
y Marcie L Rice _ James V.&am
_L Sheldon Singer Gorge L.Zlakm
J_ Roger Swum Wiliam G.Steiner
• Charls Svh`W Ruben Ward".
1 Bob Zemel Tom Daly
DISTRICT NO.6: i Jon Delay,Clair John C.Cm,Jr.
a Wiliam G.Stei er,Clair pro rem _ Roper Stamen
John C.Co.,Jr. _ Jan Debay
DISTRICT NO.6: �.5� Jams M,Ferryman,Clair _ Arthur Perry
.L. Jan Delay.Clair pro tem _ John C.Cox,Jr.
1. Wlliem G.Sumner _ Roper Stanton
DISTRICT NO.7: i Barry Hammond,Clair _ Mike Wind
Thomas R.Saharelli,Clair pro tem _ J'un Ports
Jan Delay _ John C.Co..Jr.
x James M.Ferrymen _ Amer Perry
i Pet McGuigan _ To R.Mmano
1 Mark A.Murphy _ Joanne Caen
William G.Steiner _ Roper Stamen
DISTRICT NO.11: Victor Leong,Clair _ Ralph Bauer
Shifty Depoff,Chair pro tan _ Ralph Bauer
Roger Star an _ William G.Steiner
DISTRICT NO. 13: John M.Gullixwn, Chair _ Damel T.Welch
g Bob Zemel,Clair pre tam _ Tom Daly
Bums DuNap _ G den Pinker
1 Mark A.Murphy _ Joenm Coon
t_ Wiliam G.Steiner _ Roper Sermon
DISTRICT NO. 14: a Thomas R.spheres.Chair _ Jim Potts
a Mark A.Murphy _ J..Coon
Barry Hammond.Clair pro tern _ Mike Wind
g WIonh G.Steiner _ Roper Suntan
i Peer A.Swan _ Darryl Miller
-2-
v1
2/14/96
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Don McIntyre, General Manager, Blake P. Anderson,
Assistant General Manager-Operations, Judith A
Wilson, Assistant General Manager-Administration,
Penny Kyle, Board Secretary, Cymantha Atkinson, Janet
Gray, Gary Hasenstab, Irwin Haydock, Ed Hodges, Terri
Josway, Steve Kozak, Greg Mathews, Pat McNally, Mike
Moore, Bob Ooten, Mike Peterman, Gary Streed, Jean
Tappan, Michelle Tuchman, Nancy Wheatley, Mike
While
OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Chip Clements,
Michael Ozawa, Jon Scholz, George Zlaket, Alt. Director
DISTRICT 14
Appointment of Chair Pro tem
In the absence of Chair Thomas R. Saltarelli and Chair pro tem Mark A. Murphy,
Director Barry Hammond was appointed Chair pro tern of District No. 14.
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive and file draft minutes of the
Ad Hoc Committee re Landfill Issues
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the draft minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re Landfill Issues meeting held on
January 31, 1996, be, and are hereby, received and filed; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors concur with the actions of the Ad
Hoc Committee re Landfill Issues to consider a Term Sheet at an Adjourned
Meeting on February 14, 1996.
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive and file letter from Vicki Wilson of
Intearated Waste Manaoement Department.
County of Oranae. dated January 31. 1996
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the letter dated January 31, 1996, from Vicki Wilson of the Integrated Waste
Management Department, County of Orange, regarding the proposed Resolution of
Application to the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO), be, and is
hereby, received and ordered filed.
-3-
01/27/96
DISTRICT 1
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be
adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 11:35 a.m.
DISTRICT 2
Journment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be
adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 11:35 a.m.
DISTRICT 3
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be
adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 11:35 a.m.
DISTRICT 5
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be
adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 11:35 a.m.
DISTRICT 6
Adiournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be
adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 11:35 a.m.
DISTRICT 7
Adioumment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be
adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 11:35 a.m.
4
olrz7/96
DISTRICT 13
Adournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be
adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 11:35 a.m.
DISTRICT 14
BQjoumment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be
adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 11:35 a.m.
A�- a
Secretary oft oar of Directors
of County Sant tion si ricts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 13, and 14
J:%WPDOC%BSWIN9M12M
5
'v
2/14/96
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive and file letter from Director Bob
Zemel dated February 13, 1996
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the letter dated February 13, 1996, from Director Bob Zemel, requesting that
the acquisition of the County of Orange Integrated Waste Management System be
continued until the Joint Boards have had adequate time for analysis, be, and is
hereby, received and ordered filed.
ALL DISTRICTS
Actions re Proposed acquisition of County of
Orange Integrated Waste Management System
Verbal report and Presentation
Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager of Operations, with the use of
slides reported in depth on the landfill acquisition. The Floor was then
opened for discussion.
Receive and file Staff Report
dated February 7. 1996
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Staff Report dated February 7, 1996, regarding proposed
acquisition of County of Orange Solid Waste Management System, be, and
is hereby, received and ordered filed.
Directors John M. Gullixson, Victor Leipzig, Norman Z. Eckenrode, and Jan
Debay requested that their opposition to the motion be made a matter of
record.
-4-
2r14196
Approve a Memorandum of Understanding Re
Proposed Terms and Conditions for Acauisition
and Sale of County of Orange Solid Waste
Management System and Facilities
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Memorandum of Understanding Re Proposed Terms and
Conditions for Acquisition and Sale of County of Orange Solid Waste
Management System and Facilities, to include the following, be, and is
hereby, approved:
(1) Offer to acquire all existing assets and liabilities of the 5 operating
and 20 closed landfills owned and operated by the Integrated
Waste Management Department of the County of Orange to
include cash reserves of approximately$114 million, an
environmental fund of approximately$28 million, and debts of
approximately $82 million; and,
(2) Provide acquisition terms of$300 million payable in
40 semiannual installments of$7.5 million, for 20 years; and,
(3) Conditions the offer upon the Sanitation Districts receiving waste
flow control agreements from the cities and sanitary districts
representing 90% of the solid waste generated within Orange
County by the closing date of the offer; and,
(4) Establishes a closing date of June 30, 1996, or 60 days following
acceptance and approval by the Board of Supervisors, whichever
is later; and,
(5) Other technical terms and conditions.
Directors John M. Gullixson, Victor Leipzig, Norman Z. Eckenrode, and Jan
Debay requested that their opposition to the motion be made a matter of
record.
-5-
�V
2/14/96
Authorizing the General Manager to submit
to the County Board of Supervisors a
Memorandum of Understanding Proposing
Terms and Conditions for Acquisition and
Sale of County of Oranae Solid Waste
Manaaement System and Facilities
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to submit to the
County Board of Supervisors a Memorandum of Understanding Proposing
Terms and Conditions for Acquisition and Sale of County of Orange Solid
Waste Management System and Facilities, in form approved by General
Counsel.
Directors John M. Gullixson, Victor Leipzig, Norman Z. Eckenrode, and Jan
Debay requested that their opposition to the motion be made a matter of
record.
Authorizing the General Manger to oreoare
a comprehensive Request for Proposals to
provide contract operational services
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to prepare a
comprehensive Request for Proposals from qualified firms for providing
contract operational services for all on-site operational, maintenance and
field engineering activities at the five operating landfills, and to provide said
Request for Proposals to the Joint Boards at a future meeting for approval
prior to issuance.
Directors John M. Gullixson, Norman Z. Eckenrode, and Jan Debay
requested that their opposition to the motion be made a matter of record.
ALL DISTRICTS
General Counsel's comments Prior to Closed Session
General Counsel reported to the Directors the need for a closed session and to
add one item needing immediate action that arose subsequent to the publication
of the agenda. He reported that additional items could be added pursuant to
Government Code Section 54954.2(b) upon a two-thirds vote of the Directors.
No other items would be discussed or acted upon.
-6-
2/14/96
ALL DISTRICTS
Add Item to Closed Session Agenda
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That Item No. 9(b)(1) be added to the agenda to consider a report from General
Counsel in connection with the litigation entitled Sebastian Serrantino v. County
Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court Case
No. 737044 (Government Code Section 54956.9[a)).
ALL DISTRICTS
Convene in Closed Session pursuant to
Government Code Section 54956.9
The Boards convened in closed session at 9:18 p.m. pursuant to Government
Code Section 54956.9. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the
Boards of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California
Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in
the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed
Meetings. A report of actions taken will be publicly reported at the time the
approved action becomes final re Agenda Item 9(b)(1).
ALL DISTRICTS
Reconvene in regular session
Al 9:45 p.m., the Boards reconvened in regular session.
DISTRICT 1
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be
adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:45 p.m.
DISTRICT 2
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be
adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:45 p.m.
-7-
2/14/96
DISTRICT 3
dd oumment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be
adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:45 p.m.
DISTRICT 5
Adioumment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be
adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:45 p.m.
DISTRICT 6
Journment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be
adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:45 p.m.
DISTRICT 7
Adioumment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7
be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:45 p.m.
DISTRICT 11
Journment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11
be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:45 p.m.
-8-
2/14f96
DISTRICT 13
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13
be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:45 p.m.
DISTRICT 14
Ad'oumment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14
be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:45 p.m.
ecretary of o of Directors
of County atio stricts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, , 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14
-9-
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
FEBRUARY 28, 1996
Agenda Item (8): Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying
payment of claims of the joint and individual
Districts (each Director shall be called only once
and that vote will be regarded as the same for each
District represented unless a Director expresses a
desire to vote differently for any District).
Summary
See attached listing of claim payments.
Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of payment of claims listing.
yiwaoociaswcaesEeoemae
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0122M6 PAGE 1 F
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 01/24MB POSTING DATE 012496
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
149482 A-1 FENCE CO INC. $79T00 GATE REPAIR
149453 AG TECH COMPANY $50.243.52 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0AD-9-91
149454 ASL CONSULTING ENGINEERS $1.028.74 ATWOOD SUBTRUNK PLAN PREPARATION
149485 ASRANALYSIS $1.500.00 LAB SERVICES
149485 ATM AA INC. $1.160.00 LAB SERVICES
149487 AT&T-MEGACOMSERVICE $5.453.96 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
149485 AT&T-MEGACOM SERVICE $2,903.40 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
149489 AT&T-CELLULAR CR&R $6.10 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
149420 ACORN CONSULTING $2.730.00 CONSULTING SERVICES
149491 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS,INC. $2.563.00 CONSTRUCTION PI-3&1
149492 AIR LIQUIDE AMERICA CORP. $1.247.59 SPECIALTY GASSES
149493 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $18,322.00 O&M AGREEMENT OXYGEN.SYST.M.0.8-9419
149494 ALADDIN HOUSE 9350.45 WINDOW BLINDS
149495 AMERIDATA $1.280.82 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
149496 AMERICAN AIR FILTER,INC. $1.828.36 MECHANICAL PARTS
149497 AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION 385.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
149498 AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE &317.81 CHEMICALS
149499 APA EDUCATION TRUST $2,055.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING
149500 APCO VALVE&PRIMER CORP. $1.912.56 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
149501 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $3,420.60 NOTICES&ADS
149502 APPLE ONE S5,962.00 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
149503 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $8.714.05 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
149504 AQUATIC BIOASSAY&CONSULTANTS $5,475.00 LABORATORY SERVICES
149505 ARROWHEAD ELECTRIC CORP. $416.21 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
1495DB ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE,INC. $931.20 TOXIC WASTE REMOVAL
149507 AMSA $425.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
149508 AURORA PUMP $37.00 PUMP PARTS
149509 RANDOLPH AUSTIN CO. $576.10 LAB SUPPLIES
149510 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $3,884.66 PAYROLL SERVICES
149511 BFI MEDICAL WASTE SYSTEMS $46.05 WASTE DISPOSAL
149512 E S BABCOCK&SONS INC $1,140.00 LAB ANALYSIS
149513 BAKER INSTRUMENT CO $25,019.95 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
149514 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $608.57 BATTERIES
149515 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $2,892.37 LAB SUPPLIES
149516 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $154.30 TRUCK WASH TICKETS
149517 SIOSOLIDS RECYCLERS OF SO CAL $1,000.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES
149518 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $18.14347 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-1-2
149519 BRENNER-FIEDLER&ASSOC..INC. $101.84 GENERATORS
149520 BUSH&ASSOCIATES,INC. $4.652.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6.8.94
149521 CCI TECHNOLOGIES $527.00 SPLICE CABLES
149522 C.C.S.C.E. $210.11 PUBLICATION
149523 CEM CORPORATION $7.300.40 LAB SUPPLIES
149524 CH2M HILL $10,806.20 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-31
149525 CALFON CONSTRUCTION $306,091.56 CONSTRUCTION 7-72&7-24
149526 CALTROL,INC. $1,231.05 HARDWARE
149527 CALIF ASSOC,OF SAN.AGENCIES $120.00 WORK CONFERENCE REGISTRATION
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 01/2V96 PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 0124M POSTING DATE 0124M
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
149528 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $85.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
149529 CALTEX PLASTICS,INC. 51,054.72 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
149530 CAMALI CORP. $3,625.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
149531 CAPITAL WESTWARD $223.71 MECHANICAL PARTS
149532 JOHN CARDLLO ENGINEERS $17.762.25 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-15.2
149533 JOHN CARDLLO ENGINEERS $1,337.14 ENGINEERING SERVICES MO B-23-95
149534 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $699.18 OFFICE FURNITURE
149535 MICHAEL A CRAMP $6,500.00 OCEAN MONITORING
149536 CHROME CRANKSHAFT,INC. $720.00 PUMP PARTS
149537 CLEMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL $12,572.67 CONSULTANT-LANDFILL PROJECT MO 7.31-95
149538 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $11,191.23 ELECTRICPARTS
149539 CONSUMER PIPE $1.267.02 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
149540 CONTINENTAL EQUIP 6 SUPPLY $16.52 TOOLS
149541 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $715.46 ENGINE PARTS
149542 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $348.10 TRUCK PARTS
149543 COVEY LEADERSHIP CENTER $558.00 SUBSCRIPTION
149544 CHARLES P.CROWLEY,CO. $369.24 INSTRUMENT PARTS
149545 CITY OF CYPRESS $25.00 BUDGET COPY
149546 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION $311.50 UNDERGROUND FUELIOIL STORAGE TAX
149547 SWRCB/AFRS $400.00 WASTE DISCHARGE FEE
149548 DATA SYSTEMS SERVICE $278.58 SOFTWARE
149549 ALBERT W DAMES INC 5474,827.36 CONSTRUCTION 3-38R
149550 DEL MAR ANALYTICAL 52,208.00 LAB SUPPLIES
149551 THE DIAMOND GROUP $4.000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
149552 LABCLEAR $100.52 LAB SUPPLIES
149553 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $392.51 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
1495M DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $942.52 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE
149555 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. 5265.50 PAINT SUPPLIES
149556 EDWARDS DIV.OF GS BLDG SYS. $2.641.50 SERVICE AGREEMENT
149557 LINDA EISMAN $636.66 TRAINING SUPPLIES
149558 EMERGENCY MGMT NETWORK $1,3110.00 CPRIFIRST AID TRAINING
149559 ENCHANTER,INC. $2,600.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5-24-95
149560 FLUID TECH.SALES 5614.71 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
149561 FST SAND AND GRAVEL,INC. $1.282.26 ROAD BASE MATERIALS
149562 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $16,318.36 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91
149563 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $138.50 AIR FREIGHT
1495M FILTER SUPPLY CO. $416.84 FILTERS
149565 FIRST CHOICE $1.164.32 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT
149566 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $429.60 LAB SUPPLIES
149567 FISONS INSTRUMENTS $2.161.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
149568 FLICKINGER CO $233.99 VALVE
149569 FLOSYSTEMS $10.575.05 PUMP PARTS
149570 FLUID METERING INC $2.051.17 LAB SUPPLIES
149571 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $895.80 PAINT SUPPLIES
149572 GMF SOUND INC $975.62 COMMUNICATIONS SUPPLIES
149573 GST,INC. $1,987.54 OFFICE SUPPLIES
FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 0122/96 PAGES c
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 0124/98 POSTING DATE 0124/86
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
149574 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $2.994.37 ELECTRIC PARTS
149575 GENERAL PETROLEUM $16.953.22 DIESEL/UNLEADED FUEL
149576 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $6,588.97 TELEPHONE SERVICES
149577 TOM GERLINGER $1,723.44 REIMS.TRAINING&TRAVEL
149578 GOVT CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENT $175.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
149579 GOVERNMENT INSTITUTES INC $1,655.00 PUBLICATIONS
149550 GRASSY S.T.I. $604.50 ENGINE PARTS
149581 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC WHOLESALE $402.43 FIBER OPTIC SUPPLIES
149582 DGA CONSULTANTS $6.933.93 SURVEYING SERVICES MO 8-23.95&MO 641.94
149583 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $958.49 TRUCK PARTS
149564 HARBOUR ENGINEERING $15.571.00 MECHANICAL PARTS
14VAS HAULAWAY CONTAINERS $730.00 CONTAINER RENTALS
149586 HAWKINS ASSOCIATES $450.00 LAB EQUIPMENT
149507 HOLMES&NARVER,INC. $9.125.30 ENGINEERING SERVICES PId4&P253 MO 3-8-95
149588 HOME DEPOT $132.26 SMALL HARDWARE
149569 IRS HUGHES CO,INC. $988.89 PAINT SUPPLIES
149590 IAHS PRESS $65.00 PUBLICATION
149591 ICMA DISTRIBUTION CTR $232.40 PUBLICATIONS
149592 IPCO SAFETY $3.09746 SAFETY SUPPLIES
149593 ITT BARTON SALES $960.29 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
149594 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $426.31 BATTERIES
149595 CITY OF IRVINE $29.000.00 ADJUST&REHABILITATE 43 MANHOLES
149598 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $70,44 WATER USE
149597 J2 PRINTING SERVICES $525.92 PRINTING
149598 JAMISON ENGINEERING $25,09832 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
149599 JAY'S CATERING $47.60 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE
149600 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO. $64.80 GAUGE
149601 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $1,166.08 ELECTRIC PARTS
149602 JONES CHEMICALS.INC. $13.918.72 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE MO 4-26-95
149603 JONES INDUSTRIAL HARDWARE CO. $1.091.87 TOOLS
149604 KAL ARCHITECTS $1,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
149605 FRANCES L.KALUZNY $1,680,00 HUMAN RESOURCES CONSULTANT
149606 KEYE PRODUCTIVITY CENTER $248.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
149607 KING BEARING,INC. $1.045,96 MACHINE SUPPLIES
149608 KIPLINGER $132.00 PUBLICATION
149609 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $6,538.02 TOOLS
149810 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $330.79 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICE
149611 LAIDLAW ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES $32.220.24 WASTE DISPOSAL
149612 LAMSON CORPORATION $213,89 COMPUTER PARTS
149613 LAW/CRANDAL,INC. $1,778.75 SOIL TESTING 7.13.94
149614 LEAGUE OF CLAIF.CITIES $165.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION
149515 LEE&RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC. $23.798,69 ENGINEERING SERVICES
149616 SOCO-LYNCH CORP. $493.93 JANITORIAL SERVICES
149817 MPS $59.34 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
149618 MACOMCO 5464A0 SERVICE AGREEMENT
149619 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS,INC. $6.164.68 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 01/22M6 PAGE 4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 01/24/96 POSTING DATE 01124/96
WARRANTNO. VENDOR AMOUNT
149620 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $612,150.00 CONSTRUCTION 1`1-36-2
149621 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. 558,703.97 CONSTRUCTION P242-2
149622 MARTIN INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE $3,475.20 SECURITY CONSULTING
149623 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $438.88 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
149524 THE MCGRAW-HILL COMPANIES $134A7 PUBLICATION
149625 DONALD F. MCINTYRE $103.91 REIMBURSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE
149626 MEASUREMENT VARIABLES,INC. $1,236.96 FILTER SUPPLIES
149827 MIDWAY MFG.&MACHINING $9,298.58 MECHANICAL REPAIRS
149628 MILLTRONICS $1,787.53 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
149629 MONITOR LABS $249.98 INSTRUMENT
149630 MUSTANG UNITS CO.,INC. $3.509.00 ENGINE
149631 NASCO $271.33 LAB SUPPLIES
149632 NAT WEST MARKETS $1,000.0D COP INTEREST DRAW FEES
149633 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES $875.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES
149634 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $2,215.02 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
149635 - NEWARK ELECTRONICS $153.05 INSTRUMENT PARTS
149638 NICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY $20,901.82 LUBRICANTS/DIESEL FUEL
149637 OLSTEN STAFFING SERVICES 52,016.00 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
149638 THE ORANGE COUNTY FORUM $375.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING
149539 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. $1,375.39 FITTINGS
149540 OXYGEN SERVICE $1.528.01 SPECIALTY GASES
149641 COUNTY OF ORANGE $2.530.50 PERMITS
149642 PACIFIC PARTS $2.381.52 INSTRUMENT PARTS
149643 PACIFIC BELL $1.702.85 TELEPHONE SERVICES
149644 PADGETT - THOMPSON $885.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
149645 PAGENET $1,015.90 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
149M PALLETS&ACCESSORIES CO. $1.531.13 PALLETS
149647 PARKHOUSE TIRE,INC. $1,108.88 TIRES
149648 PARTS UNLIMITED $338.96 TRUCK PARTS
149649 PEGASUS MAIL-C/O DAVID HARRIS $350.00 SOFTWARE
149650 PENN STATE UNIVERSITY $4,790.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
14SB51 MIKE PETERSON $105.49 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
14052 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $4,551.57 REIMS.PETTY CASH,TRAINING&TRAVEL
149653 POLYMETRICS,INC. $1,262.76 LAB SUPPLIES
149654 POLYPURE,INC. $23,199.40 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92
149655 POSTAGE BY PHONE $5.000.00 POSTAGE
149656 PUMPING SOLUTIONS INC $813.66 PUMP PARTS
149657 PUTZMEISTER,INC. $92.52 PUMP PARTS
149658 OMS INC $183.23 REPAIR
149659 QUICKSTART TECHNOLOGIES $3.750.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
149660 R&R INSTRUMENTS $561.59 ELECTRIC PARTS
149661 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO. $902.88 LAB SUPPLIES
149662 THE REGISTER $1,168.80 ' NOTICES&ADS
149663 REMEDYTEMP $3,190.71 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES '
149664 RENOLDINC. $85.10 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
149665 DON RICHARDSON WATER TRUCK $8.249.50 WATER TANK
d
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 01/22/96 PAGE 5 -�
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 01124M POSTING DATE 0124196
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
14M RM MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL $2,378.95 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
149667 RODNEY-HUNTCO $245.40 HEADWORKS REPAIR
149668 SKC WEST $1.284.94 SAFETY SUPPLIES
149669 SANTA PE BAG CO. $218.94 FREIGHT
149870 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $78.12 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
149671 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTL $46,715.64 OCEAN MONITORING MO 6.28-95
149672 R.CRAIG SCOTT&ASSOC. $2,756.07 LEGAL SERVICES-PERSONNEL ISSUES
149673 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $1.482.16 SPECIALTY GASES
149574 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $2.033.50 TOOLS
149575 SHURELUCK SALES $4,215.09 TOOLSHARDWARE
149676 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $1,588.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS
149677 SMITH-EMERY CO. $516.00 SOIL TESTING M.O.743.94
149878 SMITH PIPE&SUPPLY $343.37 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
149679 ROYA SOHANAKI $754.62 DAMAGE CLAIM SETTLEMENT
149590 SO COAST AIR QUALITY $1.642.48 PERMIT FEES
149681 SOUTHERN CALIF ASSOC OF $75.00 PUBLICATION
149682 SO CALIF EDISON CO $1,284.86 POWER
149583 SO CALIF EDISON CO $25,896.30 POWER
149684 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $27.157.73 NATURAL GAS
149685 SO.CALIF.WATER CO. $69.03 WATER USE
149686 SPEX CHEMICAL&SAMPLE PREP $314.98 LAB SUPPLIES
149687 SUMMIT STEEL $2,538A7 METAL
149688 SUPELCO,INC. $1,320.53 LAB SUPPLIES
149689 SUPER CHEM CORP. $608.85 CHEMICALS
149690 SURVEYORS SERVICE CO $134.79 TOOLS
149691 SYNECTIC MEDICAL,INC. $1,561.00 LAB SUPPLIES
149692 T&C INDUSTRIAL CONTROLS $1,613.00 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
149693 TEKTRONIX.INC. $385.96 INSTRUMENT PARTS
149694 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $359.21 MECHANICAL PARTS
14%95 THORPE INSULATION $47.63 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
149696 TONY'S LOCK&SAFE SERVICE $80.01 LOCKS&KEYS
149697 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $202.05 TRUCK PARTS
149698 TRUESDAIL LABS $3,540.00 LAB SERVICES
149699 JG TUCKER&SON,INC. $15.111.20 INSTRUMENT PARTS
149700 VWR SCIENTIFIC $3.281.08 LAB SUPPLIES
149701 VALIN CORPORATION $498.46 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
149702 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $1.392.40 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
149703 VERTEX TECHNOLOGIES,INC. $5.192.68 FIBER OPTICS
149704 WARREN GORHAM&LAMONT INC $349.21 PUBLICATION&SUBSCRIPTION
149705 WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION $1,155.96 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT COURSES
149706 WAXIE $1.955.02 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
149707 WAYNE ELECTRIC $28183 TRUCK PARTS
149708 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $23,679.12 CAUSTIC SODA MO 8.23.95
149709 WEST-CITE SUPPLY CO. $367.28 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
149710 ROURKE,WOODRUFF&SPRADLIN $78.983.59 LEGAL SERVICES MO 7.26.95
149711 XEROX CORP. $16.404.62 COPIER LEASES
FUND NO 9199 - Ji DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 0127/96 PAGE6
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 0124M POSTING DATE 0124M
WARRANT NO. VENDOR
149712 JOHNSON YOKOGAWA CORP. $714b3 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 1227195 $2.387.767.17
SUMMARY AMOUNT
01 CONSTR FUND $92.60
02 OPER FUND $14.36
02 CAP FAC FUND $1,028,74
02 CONSTR FUND $262,51
03 OPER FUND $25,344,19
O3 CAP FAC FUND 5474,827.36
83 CONSTR FUND $283.71
A5 OPER FUND $39227
i5 CONSTR FUND $m 80
#6 CONSTR FUND $6920
W7 OPER FUND 575.42
k7 CAP FAC FUND 312.016.06
M7 CONSTR FUND 98.11
811 OPER FUND S740A8
#11 CAP FAC FUND 1,637A4
Wit CONSTR FUND 8531
i13 CONSTR FUND S3 40
014 OPER FUND $30.85
914 CAP FAC FUND S71400
814 CONSTR FUND $19.96
93811 OPER FUND S87500
N588 OPER FUND $34.04
#586 CAP FAC FUND $644.00
4687 OPER FUND $213.30
k7814 OPER FUND $15.98
JT OPER FUND $330.891.89
CORF $716,314.33
SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $3,511A9
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $508,946.67
$2,387,767.17
m
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE O V30196 PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 01/30/96 POSTING DATE O1130/96
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
149714 ACWA $300.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING
149715 CALIF.DEBT ADVISORY $100.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING
149716 JAYS CATERING $1.684.69 DIRECTORS MEETING EXPENSE
149717 R.CRAIG SCOTT B ASSOC. E8,582.81 LEGAL SERVICES-PERSONNEL ISSUES
E70,887.50
SUMMARY AMOUNT
JT OPER FUND $1.984.69
CORP $100.00
SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $6.582.81
$10.667.50
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0VOW96 PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 02/07/96 POSTING DATE 02J07196
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
149731 AT&T- UNIPLAN SERVICE $2,494.55 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
149732 AT&T-MEGACOM SERVICE $1.404.38 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
149733 AT&T $66.53 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
149734 A T&T-CELLULAR CR&R $8.65 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
149735 A-Z LOGIC SYSTEMS $192.62 LAB SUPPLIES
149736 RP ADAMS COMPANY $1,750.43 MECHANICALPARTS
149737 AIR LIQUIDS AMERICA CORP. $1.947.32 SPECIALTY GASSES
149738 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $18,555A3 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.O.8-889
149739 AIRBORNE EXPRESS $347.57 AIR FREIGHT
149740 AMERIDATA $1.125.61 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
149741 AMERICAN AIRLINES $824.36 TRAVEL SERVICES
149742 AMOCO ENERGY TRADING $61.394.58 NATURAL GAS MO6-28-95
149743 ANIXTER-DISTRIBUTION $3.570.09 COMPUTER SUPPLIES
149744 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $2.332.22 NOTICES&ADS
149745 APPLE ONE $2.208.80 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
149746 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $124.63 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
149747 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT $1.346.82 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
149748 ATKINIJONES COMPUTER SERVICE $642.60 SERVICE AGREEMENT
149749 AUTODESK INC. $5,095.52 SOFTWARE
149750 B.M.I. $325.00 ELECTRIC PARTS
149751 E S BABCOCK&SONS INC $898.50 LAB ANALYSIS
149752 BANANA BLUEPRINT $22,449.24 PRINTING M.O.11-07-94
149753 BANK OF AMERICA $220.64 BANKING CHARGES
149754 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $954.95 BATTERIES
149755 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $1,204.72 LAB SUPPLIES
149766 BERENDSEN FLUID POWER $112.27 VALVE
149767 BLANCHARD TRAINING&DEV $103.30 TRAINING PUBLICATIONS
149768 TOM BLANDA $136.79 TRAINING EXPENSE REIMS
. 149759 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $2,842.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-18
149760 BRENNER-FIEDLER&ASSOC.,INC. $5.697.67 GENERATORS
149761 BROOKS INSTRUMENT DIV. $341.25 INSTRUMENT
149762 BUDGET JANITORIAL $3.330.00 JANITORIAL SERVICES MO 1-12-94
149763 BNI BOOKS $89.92 BOOKS
149764 CCI TECHNOLOGIES $420.00 SPLICE CABLES
149765 CEPA $899.60 LAB ANALYIS
149766 CH2M HILL $164,542.45 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-31
149767 CS COMPANY $5,762.96 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
149768 CALFON CONSTRUCTION $97.833.03 CONSTRUCTION 7.22&7-24
149769 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH INC. $969.75 LAB SUPPLIES
149770 CALTROL,INC. $6,303.69 HARDWARE
149771 CAMALI CORP. $1,124.88 SERVICE AGREEMENT
149772 CANUS CORPORATION $8,286.52 FIBER OPTIC CABLE
149773 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $32,317.74 ENGINEERING SERVICES MO 5-24-95 ,
149774 RICHARD CASTILLON $135.96 TRAINING EXPENSE REIMS
149775 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $1,758.15 OFFICE FURNITURE
149776 CHEMWEST INC $1.335.02 PUMP PARTS
a
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE D2/0 M PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 02107MO POSTING DATE 02107/96
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
149777 CHROME CRANKSHAFT,INC. $240.00 PUMP PARTS
149778 CLEMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL $20.086.10 CONSULTANT-LANDFILL PROJECT MO 7.31-95
149779 COASTAL VIDEO COMMUNICATION $13.501.43 TRAINING VIDEOS
149760 COUCH S SONS $30.643.20 CONSTRUCTION M-044
149781 COLICH&SONS $190.334.00 CONSTRUCTION 11-17-1
149782 COMMUNICATIONS PERFORMANCE GROUP $17.850.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
149783 COMPUSA,INC. $64.97 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
149784 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $7.659.20 ELECTRIC PARTS
149785 CONSUMER PIPE $2.071.20 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
149786 CONTINENTAL EQUIPMENT B SUPPLY $2,213.04 TOOLS
149787 CONTINENTAL LIB PRODUCTS,INC. $60.54 LAB SUPPLIES
149788 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $17,897.03 ENGINE PARTS
149789 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $2.464.74 ELECTRIC PARTS
149790 CHARLES P.CROWLEY,CO. $648.25 INSTRUMENT PARTS
149791 ALBERT W.DAVIES,INC. $320.454.55 CONSTRUCTION 3-35R
149792 DOUGLAS J DAVIS&ASSOC.,INC. $3.949.90 INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE SERVICES
149793 DELL COMPUTER CORP. $752.10 COMPUTER PARTS
149794 DEL MAR ANALYTICAL $190.00 BIOSOLIDS ANALYSIS
149795 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIF. $60.889.11 DENTAL INSURANCE PLAN M.O.1-12-94
149796 DELTA FOAM PRODUCTS $145.00 LAB SUPPLIES
149797 THE DIAMOND GROUP $4,000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
149798 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $31,912.81 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
149799 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $90.51 PAINT SUPPLIES
149800 OVALS SALES $576.19 FITTINGS
149801 OYCORP $241.79 TRUCK PARTS
1498D2 ESP NORTH $685.46 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
1498D3 EDWARDS HIGH VACUUM INTER. $290.57 LAB SUPPLIES
149804 FMC CORPORATION $75.299.11 HYDROGEN PEROXIDE MO 9-14-94
149805 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $111.65 AIR FREIGHT
149806 FILTERLINE CORP. $37.00 FILTERS
149807 FILTER SUPPLY CO. 54,839.53 FILTERS
149808 FIRST CHOICE $391.64 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT
149809 FISCHER B PORTER CO. $2,774.75 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES
149810 FISHER ROSEMOUNT $1.736.98 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
149811 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $13,591.44 WATER USE
149812 FRY'S ELECTRONICS $723.39 ELECTRONIC B COMPUTER SUPPLIES
149813 GST,INC. $11.443.85 COMPUTER SUPPLIES
149814 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $2.543.98 CHEMICALS
149815 GATES FIBERGLASS INSTALLERS $3,2D4.62 FIBERGLASS WHEEL
149818 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $4,066.49 ELECTRIC PARTS
149817 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1.078.10 TELEPHONE SERVICES
149818 GERHARDTS,INC. 54,200.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
149819 GIERLICH-MNCHELL.INC. $25,486.56 PUMP PARTS
149820 WW GRAINGER,INC. $122.64 COMPRESSOR PARTS
149821 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS 52,095.90 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
149822 GRAYRAR ELECTRIC WHOLESALE $3,238.29 FIBER OPTIC SUPPLIES
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 021D6196 PAGE 3
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 02107196 POSTING DATE 0=7196
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
149823 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $600.52 PRINTING
149824 DGA CONSULTANTS $3,020.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.03-&94
149825 HR DIRECT $1399 OFFICE SUPPLIES
149826 HB TYPE B GRAPHICS $346.96 PRINTING
149827 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $3.199.85 TRUCK PARTS
149828 HACH COMPANY $3.810.35 LAB SUPPLIES
149829 GEORGE T.HALL CO. S456A8 ELECTRIC PARTS
149830 HATCH 8 KIRK.INC. $3.024.91 TRUCK PARTS
149831 PL HAWN CO.INC. $321.23 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
149832 HELLO DIRECT $198.76 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
149833 HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT $2.083.33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN.
149834 HERTZ EQUIPMENT RENTAL $502.95 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
149835 HOERBIGER CVS CALIF.,INC. $2,972.67 COMPRESSOR PARTS
149336 HOME DEPOT $756.92 SMALL HARDWARE
149837 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $653.38 PAINT SUPPLIES
149638 1 CM A DISTRIBUTION CENTER $141.85 PUBLICATION
149839 IPCO SAFETY $4,121,94 SAFETY SUPPLIES
149840 ISI INFORTEXT $3.692.75 SOFTWARE
149841 ITT BARTON SALES $192.12 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
149842 IMAGING PLUS $523.81 OFFICE SUPPLIES
149843 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $35.56 CONNECTORS
149844 INORGANIC VENTURES $227.72 LAB SUPPLIES
149845 INSIDE EPA $1.335.00 SUBSCRIPTIONS
149846 INSTRUMENT LABORATORY $373.59 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
149847 IRVINE PHOTO GRAPHICS $21.29 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
149848 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $5.54 WATER USE
149849 IRVINE SCI-TECH BOOKS $430.00 PUBLICATIONS
149850 J2 PRINTING SERVICES $2.533.79 PRINTING
149851 JAMISON ENGINEERING $12.010.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
149852 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $1.711.37 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
149853 DEE JASPAR 8 ASSOC. $5.005.32 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
149854 JAY'S CATERING $1,418.39 DIRECTORS MEETING EXPENSE
149856 JOHNSON CONTROLS,INC. $203.80 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
149856 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $149.20 ELECTRIC PARTS
149857 JOHNSTON PUMP CO $2.193.02 ELECTRIC PARTS
149858 JONES CHEMICALS,INC. $7,457.31 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE MO 426-95
149859 FRANCES L KALUZNY $1,280.00 HUMAN RESOURCES CONSULTANT
149B60 KELLY PAPER $937.40 PRINTING
149861 KEMIRON PACIFIC,INC. $149.592.10 FERRIC CHLORIDE M09-27-95
149862 KERRY CONSULTING GROUP $3,906.18 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MO 11-15-95
149863 KEYE PRODUCTIVITY CENTER $139.00 REGISTRATION
149864 KING BEARING,INC. $1,408.90 MACHINE SUPPLIES
149865 KLEINFELDER $432.00 GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTING SERVICES
149566 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $5.598.92 TOOLS '
149867 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $613.57 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICE
149868 LAIDLAW ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES $5,444.04 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DISPOSAL
b
FUNDNO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE O2 /96 PAGE4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 02I07/96 POSTING DATE 02/07M
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
149869 LAWAIR SUPPLY CO.,INC. $114.53 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
149870 LASERALL CORP. $582.00 PRINTER REPAIR
149871 LAW/CRANDAL,INC. 5660.00 SOIL TESTING 7-M94
149672 LEE 6 RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC. $9.908.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES
149873 UEBERT CORPORATION $2.291.38 ELECTRIC PARTS
149874 K.P.LINDSTROM,INC. $3.481.14 ENVIR.CONSULTING SERVICES MO 12-9-90
149375 LUSTRE-CAL $545.98 SAFETY
149870 MDT BIOLOGIC COMPANY $935.00 LAB SUPPLIES
149877 MPS $414.04 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
149578 MACOMCO $596.75 SERVICE AGREEMENT
149879 MAGNETEK $38.213.59 GENERATOR MAINTENANCE
149880 MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY CORP. $1,652.48 TOOLS
149BBI MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $22.20 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
149882 MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. $551.63 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
149883 MIDWAY MFG.8 MACHINING $3.029.56 MECHANICAL REPAIRS
149884 MISSION INDUSTRIES $6,704.89 UNIFORM RENTALS
149885 MONITOR LABS $874.44 INSTRUMENT
149886 MOODYS INVESTORS SERVICE $5.000.00 RATING SERVICE MAINTENANCE FEES
149887 MOORE PRODUCTS CO $179.39 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
149888 MORTON SALT 5673.70 SALT
149889 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES $5,367.50 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES
149890 G ROBERTNEASE PHOTOGRAPHY $1,677.B7 PROFESSIONAL PHOTOGRAPHER
149891 NEW HORIZONS COMPUTER CENTERS.INC. $780.00 SOFTWARE TRAINING CLASSES
149892 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $6.00 WATER USE
149893 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $5.929.94 OFFICE SUPPLIES
149894 OLSTEN STAFFING SERVICES $1.708.00 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
149895 ORANGE COURIER $138.65 COURIER SERVICES
149896 ORANGE VALVE B FITTING CO. $107.91 FITTINGS
149697 OXYGEN SERVICE $3,456.73 SPECIALTY GASES
149598 ORANGE CO EMPLOYEES $4.799.25 EARLY RETIREMENT PROGRAM REIMS
149899 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT $27.760.20 GAP WATER USE M.O.64-93
149900 PACIFIC CUPPIINGS $188.80 CONTRACT SERVICE
142901 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $1.116.06 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
149902 PACIFIC PARTS $9.238.84 INSTRUMENT PARTS
149903 PACIFIC BELL $15.90 TELEPHONE SERVICES
149904 PARAGON CABLE $41.28 CABLE SERVICES
1499D5 PARKHOUSE TIRE,INC. 5555.99 TIRES
149906 PEDERSEN COMMUNICATIONS $4,348.00 INSTALLATION OF CABLES
149907 PERSONAL STRENGHTS PUBLICATION $394.01 PUBLICATION
149908 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $620.07 REIMS.PETTY CASH,TRAINING B TRAVEL
149909 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $193,03.20 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3.29-95
149910 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS $5.914.44 CONSULTING SERVICE
149911 POLYPURE,INC. $24,135.22 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-92
149912 POWER PROTECTION $432.48 MISC.HARDWARE
149913 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $112.00 ICE FOR SAMPLES
149914 PROMINENT FLUID CONTROL,INC. $799.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 02106196 PAGES
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 02/07M POSTING DATE 02107/96
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
149915 PRYOR REPORT 5532.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
149916 PUBLIC SECTOR EXCELLENCE $7,200.00 TRAINING CONSULTANT-RISK MGMIT
149917 PUMPING SOLUTIONS,INC. $298.33 PUMP PARTS
149918 PYRAMID FENCE COMPANY $2.275.00 FENCING INSTALLATION
149919 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $590.59 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS
149920 R&R INSTRUMENTS $1.837.70 ELECTRIC PARTS
149921 REMEDYTEMP $2,245.53 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
149922 DON RICHARDSON WATER TRUCK $8,218.50 WATER TANK
149923 RM MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL AND/OR RTRAL $2.126.67 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
149924 LAWRENCE ROOD $186.85 EXPENSE REPORT
149925 SANCON ENGINEERING,INC. $750.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES
149926 SANTA FIE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $154.83 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
149927 BASCO ELECTRIC $2.220.00 CONTRACT SERVICES
149928 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INPL _ $38,887.70 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6E-94
149929 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $3,678.03 SPECIALTY GASES
149930 SENTIENT SYSTEMS,INC. $19,619.87 FACILITATOR SERVICES
149931 SHURELUCK SALES $3.019.75 TOOLSIHARDWARE
149932 THE SMITH GROUP $3.487.10 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
149933 SOLAR TURBINES INCORPORATED $304.98 MECHANICAL PARTS
149934 SO COAST AIR QUALITY $2.594.79 PERMIT FEES
149935 SO CALIF EDISON CO $59,477.32 POWER
149936 SO CALIF EDISON CO $16,241.93 POWER
149937 SO.CALIFORNIA MARINE INST. E500.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
149930 STAMEN Z.SPASSOFF P.E. $4,000.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19-2
149939 SUMMIT STEEL 5602.02 METAL
149940 SUPERB ONE-HOUR PHOTO $36.26 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
149941 SYMCAS $5,657.92 SOFTWARE LICENSE
149942 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $2,72&03 MECHANICAL PARTS
149943 TIRE WAREHOUSE $1,113.62 TIRES
149944 TONER SYSTEM INTERNATIONAL $1,412.16 PRINTER SUPPLIES
149945 TRANE $352.41 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
149946 TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY,INC. $17.503.84 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.0.5-H-94
149947 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $535.71 TRUCK PARTS
149948 TRUESDAIL LABS $1,120.10 LAB SERVICES
149N9 JG TUCKER&SON,INC. $2.326.54 INSTRUMENT PARTS
149950 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $403.00 LAB SUPPLIES
149951 UNISOURCEWOR BUTLER PAPER $837.49 OFFICE SUPPLIES
149952 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $806.70 PARCEL SERVICES
149953 VWR SCIENTIFIC $145,42 LAB SUPPLIES
149954 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $2.089.95 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
149955 VANIER BUSINESS FORMS $975.95 OFFICE SUPPLIES
149956 VARIAN ASSOCIATES,INC. $1,298.61 LAB SUPPLIES
149957 VERTEX SYSTEMS $3.570.26 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT
149958 VILLAGE NURSERIES $326.26 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES
149959 WACKENHUT CORP. $27.295.79 CONTRACT SERVICESECURRY GUARDS
149960 WAL-CON CONSTRUCTION CO. $170,041.19 CONSTRUCTION 5.37-3
O ..
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 02/06196 PAGE 6
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 02107188 POSTING DATE 02/07196
WARRANT NO, VENDOR
149961 WAL-CON CONSTRUCTION CO. $8,400.89 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
149962 CARL WARREN S CO. $300.00 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR
149963 WAXIE E4,792.61 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
149964 WESTERN CITY MAGAZINE $63.00 SUBSCRIPTION
149965 WESTERN COMPONENT SALES NORTH E41732 LAB SUPPLIES
149966 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $35.993.49 CAUSTIC SODA MO 11-23-95
149967 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $1.015.13 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
149960 WESCO E290.89 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
149969 WOLFE AND ASSOCIATES,INC. $1,688.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
149970 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $291.57 LAB SUPPLIES
149971 YELLOW SPRINGS INSTRUMENT CO. $37.14 LAB SUPPLIES
149972 AG TECH COMPANY $58.580.03 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10.9-91
149973 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. $60.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL
149974 AWARDS B TROPHIES $147.58 PLAQUES
149975 BANANA BLUEPRINT $227.10 PRINTING M.O.11-07-94
149976 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. E4,340.62 LAB SUPPLIES
149977 BIOGRO DIVISION $84,345.91 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 4-26-95
149976 COMPUSERVE $126.02 COMPUTER SERVICES
149979 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $1,463.86 ELECTRIC PARTS
149980 ENCHANTER,INC. $3,500,00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5.24-95
149981 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $867.70 LAB SERVICES
149982 PST SAND AND GRAVEL,INC. $769.35 ROAD BASE MATERIALS
149983 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $7,568.75 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9.91
1499" FILTER SUPPLY CO. E33.97 FILTERS
149985 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $889.16 LAB SUPPLIES
149986 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $360.68 PHOTO SUPPLIES
149987 NEW HORIZONS COMPUTER CENTERS,INC. $5,340.00 SOFTWARE TRAINING CLASSES
149988 BOLT DELIVERY $99.30 FREIGHT
E2,802.740.31
FUND NO 91" - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE D2/O6/96 PAGE 7
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 07/07I98 POSTING DATE 02/07/98
SUMMARY AMOUNT
01 CONSTR FUND $443.50
#2 OPER FUND $3,135.08
#2 CAP PAC FUND $11.91
#2 CONSTR FUND $1.886.50
93 OPER FUND $42.711.83
03 CAP FAC FUND $360,028.95
03 CONSTR FUND $1,074.50
05 OPER FUND $12,132.11
05 CONSTR FUND $670.50
06 CAP FAG FUND $69.84
06 CONSTR FUND $183.00
07 OPER FUND $15.594.71
07 CAP FAC FUND $46,079.10
07 CONSTR FUND $515.00
011 OPER FUND $4,148.29
011 CAP FAC FUND $190,778.76
011 CONSTR FUND $227.00
014 CAP FAC FUND $17.05
05&8 OPER FUND $2.454.64
05&6 CAP FAC FUND 170,082.66
06&7 OPER FUND 2,256.68
07&14 OPER FUND 8,341.96
JT OPER FUND $1,097,537.60
CORF &377,868.63
SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $63,272.44
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $183,218.02
$2.602.740.34
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
FEBRUARY 28, 1996
Agenda Item (9)(a): Consideration of Resolution No. 96-17, receiving and
filing bid tabulation and recommendation and
awarding contract for Purchase of Muriatic Acid,
Specification No. C-037, to Pressure Vessel Service, Inc., for the delivered price of
$0.46 per gallon, plus sales tax, for a one-year period beginning April 10, 1996, with
provisions for four one-year extensions (estimated annual cost $69,800.00 plus
sales tax).
Summary
The Districts use muriatic acid to clean the treatment plant foul air scrubbers and related
equipment. The Districts expect to use approximately 130,000 gallons of chemical during
the next contract period.
The Districts have traditionally purchased an acid of 32% concentration. At this
concentration, the chemical is on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
hazardous material list and the Districts would have to develop an EPA-required "Risk
Management and Prevention Plan" (RMPP). This plan is estimated to cost the Districts
$200,000. Therefore, the Districts elected to purchase acid at a 20% concentration. Al an
acid concentration of 20%, the chemical is not on the EPA hazardous material list and the
Districts will not be required to develop an RMPP.
Purchasing the chemical at the lower concentration will increase the Districts' chemical
costs. The increase in cost is related to the additional water required for dilution and the
associated cost to transport the water to the treatment plants.
Sealed bids were received on January 30, 1996, for furnishing and delivering 20% muriatic
acid for a one-year period, beginning April 10, 1996, with an option for four one-year
extensions. Five bids and two no-bids were received.
The bids are based on furnishing and delivering 130,000 gallons of bulk chemical acid.
The low bid was $59,800.00 and the high bid was $113,750,000, plus all applicable sales
lax. The low bid represents a cost of$0.46 per gallon of bulk chemical, including delivery,
but exclusive of sales tax. The Districts budgeted $21,000 for acid for the fiscal year.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends award of a contract to Pressure Vessel Service, Inc., for the Purchase
of Muriatic Acid, Specification No. C-037, at the above-mentioned "low bid" unit price, for a
one-year period, with provisions for four one-year extensions.
JAW PDOC185UG96TE896'&A.
n
February 7, 1996
MEMORANDUM bm
TO: Robert J. Ooten
Director of Operations
FROM: Katherine Yarosh
Senior Buyer
SUBJECT: Purchase of Muriatic Acid
Specification No. C-037
Sealed bids were opened January 30, 1996, for the Purchase of Muriatic Acid, Specification
No. 0037. Tabulation of bids is as follows:
SUPPLIER DELIVERED PRICE
PER GALLON
Pressure Vessel Service, Inc. $.46
Gallade $.475
HoltraChem, Inc. $.59
Los Angeles Chemical $.875
Western States Chemical Supply Corp. $.445/1500 gal.
$.352/3000 gal.
All Pure Chemical Company No-Bid
Commerce Chemical Company No-Bid
Staff recommends the award be made to Pressure Vessel Service,Inc.,the lowest responsible bidder,for a
one-year contract period starling April 10, 1996. The total estimated annual delivered price of$59,800.00,
including freight and taxes, but exclusive of sales tax,is based on furnishing 130,000 gallons. Provisions
are in the specifications for up tot four(4)one-year contract extensions.
a nt Ma YM Cry r?
Katherine Yarosh 1
Senior Buyer
We hereby concur vA he above reWmmendation
G ry G. Streen
Director of FhIWFM
n
Robert J. Ooten
Director of Operations
KY:Ih
G1W PTURCMIIELLER\BIMCO37AIR
CSDOC • P.O.Box 8127 0 Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 • (714)962-2411
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
FEBRUARY 28, 1996
Agenda Item (9)(b): Consideration of Resolution No. 96-18, approving
Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services
Agreement with Clifford A. Forkert Civil
Engineers for Surveying Services for Various Collection System and Treatment
Plant Projects, Specification No. P-150, providing for a name change to Forkert
Engineering & Surveying, Inc.
Summary
Clifford A. Forkert Civil Engineers was awarded a contract in June 1994 to assist in
Surveying Services for Various Collection System and Treatment Plant Projects,
Specification No. P-150. The firm has recently reorganized under the new name of Forkert
Engineering & Surveying, Inc.
Staff Recommendation
Staff is requesting the Boards of Directors to adopt a resolution approving Amendment
No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Clifford A. Forkert Civil Engineers for
Surveying Services for Various Collection System and Treatment Plant Projects,
Specification No. P-150, providing for a name change to Forkert Engineering & Surveying,
Inc.
JiWPDOCIBSNGWFE8W&B
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
FEBRUARY 28, 1996
District No. 2
Agenda Item (9)(c): Consideration of Resolution No. 96-22-2
approving reimbursement agreement with
Orange County Flood Control District re:
Installation of flood protection on South River Trunk as part of the Santa Ana
River Flood Improvements in an amount not to exceed $50,000.00.
Summary
As the Directors are aware, for many years the Corps of Engineers has planned,
designed, and is now constructing improvements to the Santa Ana River Mainstem
including channel improvements to the Santa Ana River within Orange County. The
channel improvements are a joint project of the Orange County Flood Control District
and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Reach 7 of the Santa Ana River Mainstem
Project, the Santa Ana River Channel from Glassell Street to Imperial Highway, will
soon be awarded for construction. Within Reach 7, the District operates the South
River Trunk which crosses the channel at Imperial Highway under an encroachment
permit issued in 1976. Under the terms of that permit, the Sanitation District is
responsible for all costs associated with the protection of the sewer line. The District
has worked with the Orange County Flood Control District to include within the Corps
project flood protection to this existing sewer trunk. Including this work in the Corps of
Engineers' contract will reduce costs and administrative work. The construction cost is
estimated at $35,224.00 to which must be added a 10 percent charge for Flood Control
District inspection and administration costs. This request is to approve a
reimbursement agreement authorizing the District to pay up to $50,000.00 to cover
administrative costs, possible change orders or higher than estimated bids.
Staff Recommendation
Authorize the expenditure for up to $50,000.00 for the protection of the South River
Trunk within the Santa Ana River Channel and approve Reimbursement Agreement
No. D95-135 providing for flood protection of the South River Trunk and reimbursement
of costs to the Orange County Flood Control District.
JAWPD0ORSWG%\FEB96l C.
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
FEBRUARY 28, 1996
District 5
Agenda Item (9)(d): Consideration of motion to receive and file
Summons and Complaint for Inverse
Condemnation, Charles G. Reynolds, at al., vs.
City of Newport Beach, et al., Superior Court Case
No. 758245, for alleged damages to homes due to
surface run off because of a ruptured sewer line
adjacent to plaintiffs' homes, and authorize
District's General Counsel to appear and defend
the interests of the District.
Summary
Please see General Counsel's memorandum dated February 14, 1996.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Board of Directors receive and file Summons & Complaint
for Inverse Condemnation, Charles G. Reynolds, et al., vs. City of Newport Beach, et
al., Superior Court Case No. 758245 and authorize District's General Counsel to appear
and defend the interests of the District.
J:\WPD0C1BSNG9 EBM%D.
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
FEBRUARY 28, 1996
(11)(a) committees' Minutes
mma
(1) Receive and file draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on
January 24, 1996.
(2) Receive and file draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for
the meeting held on February 1, 1996.
(3) Receive and file draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services
Committee Minutes for the meeting held on February 7, 1996.
(4) Receive and file draft Finance, Administration, and Human Resources
Committee Minutes for the meeting held on February 14, 1996.
(5) Receive and file draft Executive Committee Minutes for the meeting held on
February21, 1996.
Summary
See attached draft minutes.
Recommendation
Receive and file draft minutes listed above.
J:WPDOCa5NG98FEB98�11AW PD
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County,California
P.O. Box 8127 • 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127
Telephone: (714)962-2411
DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE
January 24, 1996-5:30 p.m.
A meeting of the Steering Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held Wednesday, January 24, 1996,
at 5:30 p.m., at the Districts' Administrative office.
(1) ROLL CALL
The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
STEERING COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT:
Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel
Present:
John C. Cox, Jr., Joint Chair
Peer A. Swan, Vice Joint Chair STAFF PRESENT:
George Brown, Chair, FAHR Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager
John J. Collins, Chair, PDC Blake P. Anderson, Assistant General Manager
Pat McGuigan, Chair, OMTS Judith A. Wilson, Assistant General Manager
Nancy Wheatley, Director of Technical Services
Absent: Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary
Roger Stanton, Vice Chair, FAHR
(2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no comments by any member of the public.
(4) APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of the December 13, 1995 Steering Committee meeting were
approved as drafted.
V
Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting
Page 2
January 24, 1996
(5) REPORTS OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR. GENERAL MANAGER AND
GENERAL COUNSEL
(a) There was no report by the Committee Chairman.
(b) The General Manager reported on his participation in professional outside
interests. He is currently active on two committees, which are helping him
understand the politics and players in the County. He is not representing
the Districts but rather himself. Director Swan expressed some concern
because the Restructuring Committee (a subcommittee of the Orange
County Division of the League of California Cities) does not have any
elected officials as members. Mr. McIntyre said that the group is more of a
"think tank" and will be making recommendations only and sharing ideas.
He will keep the Directors informed.
The Districts' response to Assemblyman Pringle's proposed Special
Districts Consolidation bill. The Committee advised staff to make personal
contact with Mr. Pringle here in Orange County, if possible, or his aides.
Chair Cox said that this issue was discussed at CASA last week, and the
CASA lobbyist said that he is unclear where Mr. Pringle is coming from.
Judy Wilson indicated that this bill may be the result of LAFCO's taking so
long to act on the Garden Grove Sanitary District dissolution, any may
have been suggested by the mayor of Garden Grove.
(c) There was no report by Counsel.
(6) DISCUSSION ITEMS
(a) Update on the status of the Consolidation Effort
Judy Wilson reported on the activities since the last meeting. The draft
feasibility plan was received just this afternoon and she hasn't had a
chance to review it in too much detail. Basically, the consultant is
suggesting proceeding to form one district that incorporates all nine
districts. One important thing to consider is the real estate investment
(about$15 million) by District 14. This sum could be credited against the
reserves that IRWD needs to provide the Districts.
Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting
Page 3
January 24, 1996
Zones would have to be established to address the issue of different
connection fees. These fees are going to be addressed in the strategic
plan. Eventually they would be equalized over time, depending on the
capital requirements specified in the Strategic Plan, and then the zones
can be eliminated and user fees established
The report does not recommend annexing any areas that could be
annexed. This areas will be identified in the LAFCO application and
LAFCO may stipulate that this be done.
The $60,000 in general obligation debt must be addressed.
Director Swan indicated that the more he hears, the more uncomfortable
he is becoming about the terms.
General Counsel indicated that depending on what section of the state
code new district is created under would determine whether IRWD would
have a seat on the Board. Director Swan said that he needs to make sure
that all the electeds know the consequences.
The Pringle bill would certainly have an impact, and Assemblyman Pringle
has indicated that the County Sanitation Districts are part of the picture.
Chair Cox indicated that consolidation is the smartest thing to do and that
it would allow fixing the organization. The issue will not go forward without
everyone understanding the issues and ramifications.
Director Swan said that he wanted to see the proposal address Districts 13
and 14 specifically.
Judy will be working with the consultant to finalize the report, including
estimating capital needs. She will also be meeting with IRWD staff to go
through the report's findings and to get their feed back.
Director Swan indicated that if the terms and conditions are right, then he
would have no problem with consolidating.
Chair Cox said that this issue must be treated as a business decision:
Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting
Page 4
January 24, 1996
The final report will be presented to the Executive Committee at the
February meeting. Any recommendations will be presented to the full
Boards for approval.
(b) Discussion of Excess Capacity Charge
Nancy Wheatley discussed the Staff Report on the Excess Capacity
Charge. There are several issues that need to be clamed. First, the
Excess Capacity Charge, which was repealed, would have charged
businesses that significantly increase their discharges over their permitted
limits, as well as new large dischargers coming into the County. When the
new ordinance was rescinded, it removed the new business charge and
the provision to charge for major increases by existing companies. This
has created an inequity between new and existing businesses since under
the old ordinance there is no provision to charge for major increases. Staff
is requesting approval of a one-year moratorium until a new fee can be
developed as part of the Strategic Plan. Any applicants who submit permit
applications for either a new connection, or an increase in discharge limits,
will be advised that the moratorium is in effect and when the fees are
determined, they will be required to pay them. If the new charge is higher
than the Excess Capacity Charge (the repealed version) when the fee is
finally established, they would be able to pay that fee rather than the new
fee. If the charge is lower, the business would be assessed as
implemented.
The new Strategic Plan will address the issue of which businesses should
pay how much for capital charges. The capital charge will apply to
businesses that increase their discharge over 50,000 gallons per day, but
until then, applicants will be advised that if a firm increases flow, they will
not be charged during the moratorium, but will be required to pay when the
charge is developed.
Director Collins felt that this was the fairest way to handle this issue at this
time.
Chair Cox said that this issue needs to be looked at more
comprehensively, not unlike the SCAQMD did with their business
assistance council. We have to let the business community know what we
are doing to change our operating procedures to reduce costs, and we
need to begin thinking more competitively.
Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting
Page 5
January 24, 1996
A Newport Beach developer has asked for a waiver of fees for a planned
seniors facility. After discussion, staff was directed to advise the applicant
that an appeal may be requested from the District 5 directors.
The General Manager indicated that it would be advisable for the cities
planning and development staff to attend the Strategic Planning sessions
so that they are aware of the things being considered and the reasons
behind them.
Staff was authorized to present to the working Committees and the Boards
the recommendation of a moratorium until the new fees are in place. No
firm will pay an excess capacity charge at this time, though they will be
informed that there will be one eventually and they will be required to pay
at that time. The square footage charge will continue, as will the single-
family residence fee. Any firm in the permit application cycle will be asked
to sign an agreement of understanding.
(c) Update on Landfill Acquisition Issues
Don McIntyre and Blake Anderson have met or will be meeting with all five
of the County supervisors to go over our proposal. They also met with Jan
Mittermeier. Supervisor Saltarelli and Ms. Mittermeier believe that the
County should maximize the value of the system. Supervisor Steiner
appears to understand the political realities and what the cities think about
the proposal. Everyone seems to understand the need to get all the cities
involved.
The big issue is the value of the system. On Monday, IWMD staff advised
the Districts that they would not be providing the E&Y evaluation numbers
as previously indicated. Ms. Mittermeier stated that the $15 million for 20
years was the floor and they would be working from that.
Staff met with Price Waterhouse today, and depending on the assumptions
used the value went from a minus $30 million to plus $200 million.
If the 75-day period comes and there is no agreement, the County has
indicated that they may remove the exclusive negotiating rights and start
discussions with others. The General Manager stated that Supervisor
Saltarelli indicated he does not think selling the landfills to a private
contractor makes sense but privatizing could helpmake the tipping fees go
Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting
Page 6
January 24, 1996
down. Some of his numbers do not agree with our findings. He also
mentioned that the County may want to contract with the Districts to run
the system.
Director Collins asked that a printout of the various scenarios be available.
Blake indicated that they will be ready at next week's Ad Hoc Committee
meeting.
The County is working towards a resolution to meet the June deadline.
d) General Manager Performance Evaluation
The General Manager asked if there were any questions on his
performance evaluation package. This will be reviewed at the February
meeting in closed session. Director McGuigan stated that the goals
package was very well done. That section, according to the General
Manager, was prepared to show where we were a month ago. The
General Manager also mentioned that one weakness of his is over-
committing staff. Director Swan asked whether Blake would be able to
handle the new Watershed Committee activities in light of his current
assignments. Blake indicated that the landfill issue and the bankruptcy
are very close to being settled which should allow him more time. Other
things that staff are working on are the Executive Management retreat Feb.
1 and 2 to start the '96-97 budget preparation process; the Strategic Plan
workshop on Saturday, Jan. 27; the Grand Jury visit January 30; and a
presentation to the Business Council that same day.
e) Review of Working Committees Pre-agenda Items
There are only five items to be considered by the OMTS and/or the PDC
Committee in February. Staff will preview them with the Committee Chairs
separately. Next month the listings will be submitted to the Steering
Committee.
(7) CLOSED SESSION
There was no closed session.
Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting
Page 7
January 24, 1996
(8) OTHER BUSINESS
There was no other business discussed.
(9) MATTERS TO BE REPORTED AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING
The General Manager's evaluation will be discussed at the next meeting,
February 28, at time certain 6:15 p.m.
(10) MATTERS ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT
There were no matters for a future agenda.
(11) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS
The next meeting has been scheduled for February 28, 1996 at 5:30 p.m.
(12) ADJOURNMENT
The Steering Committee adjourned at approximately 7:23 p.m.
Submitted by:
Jean Tappan, Steering Committee Secretary
�cw�2M,.
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
P.O. Box 8127• 10844 Ellis Avenue
a Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127
Telephone: (714) 962-2411
DRAFT
MINUTES OF PLANNING, DESIGN AND
CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE
THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 1, 1996, at 5:30 p.m.
A regular meeting of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee of the County Sanitation
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13, and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Thursday,
February 1, 1996, at the Districts' Administrative Office.
(1) ROLL CALL
The roll was taken and a quorum declared present, as follows:
Planning, Design and
Construction Committee: Staff Present:
Present: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
John Linder, Construction Manager
John Collins, Chair
John Cox
Shirley Dettloff Others Present:
Don Griffin
Barry Hammond Mary Lee, John Carollo Engineers
Margie Rice
Sheldon Singer, Vice Chair
Charles Sylvia
Absent:
Walter K. Bowman
Peer Swan
Bob Zemel
Minutes of Planning, Design and m
Construction Committee Meeting
Page 2
February 1, 1996
(2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments received.
(4) APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF JANUARY 4. 1996 MEETING
The minutes of the January 4, 1995 Planning, Design and Construction Committee
Meeting were approved as written.
(5) REPORTS OF COMMITTEE CHAIR, GENERAL MANAGER, ASSISTANT GENERAL
MANAGER, DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING, AND GENERAL COUNSEL
(a) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
The Committee Chair stated that he would like only necessary staff to take part in
the Committee Meetings, and was pleased that only those needed were in
attendance at this meeting.
(b) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
No report was given.
(c) REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER
This report was combined with Item (6) below.
(d) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING
No report was given.
(a) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
No report was given.
(6) STAFF OVERVIEW OF DISTRICTS' PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION
ACTIVITIES
(a) Status Report on Jobs within the Plants and the Districts by the Director of
Enoineerina
The Director of Engineering gave a status report on Contract No. 5-37-3,
Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3, and Balboa
Boulevard Sewer Replacement and Abandonment of 47th Street Pump Station
Project, City of Newport Beach, concerning construction methods to handle the
methane gas problem near the Hoag Hospital entrance on Pacific Coast Highway.
y Minutes of Planning, Design and
Construction Committee Meeting
Page 3
February 1, 1996
He then gave an update on the latest bid opening concerning the Maintenance
Building at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-353; Process Area Fire Protection, Signage
and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job Nos.
Pl-38-5 and 132-46; and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant
No. 2, Job No. P2.55. The apparent low bidder was Sverdrup Civil, Inc. In the total
amount of$13,196,500.00. The low bid is under the approved Engineer's
estimated amount of$13,200,000.00, and is scheduled for award at the
February 28, 1996 Board of Directors' Meeting.
(7) OLD BUSINESS
None to report.
(8) ACTIONS RE PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTS
(a) Monthly Change Order Report by Director of Engineering on Change Orders
approved by the General Manager, Planning, Design and Construction
Committee, and Joint Boards.
The Director of Engineering reported on the one new Change Order listed on the
report.
(b) Action items:
PDC96-08: Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the
plans and specifications for Replacement of Pacific Coast
Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3, and Balboa Boulevard Sewer
Replacement and Abandonment of 47th Street Pump Station
Project, City of Newport Beach, Contract No. 5-37-3, authorizing
an addition of$232,610.00 to the contract with Wal-Con
Construction Company for six items of additional work,
increasing the total authorized compensation to an amount not
to exceed $2,278,068.03.
The Director of Engineering reported on the Change Order. There
were questions from the Chair and Committee members concerning
undisclosed utilities and changed conditions. The Change Order
was discussed in detail and explained to the Committee members.
It was moved, seconded and carried to recommend approval of this
item.
(9) ADDENDA TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS
None to report.
Minutes of Planning, Design and 4
Construction Committee Meeting
Page 4
February 1, 1996
(10) NEW PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS
None to report.
(11) CONSIDERATION OF NEW AND MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS
None to report.
(12) CLOSED SESSION
The Chair determined that there was no need for a closed session.
(13) OTHER BUSINESS, IF ANY
Committee members asked to be briefed on the status of the landfill acquisition. Director
Collins and Director Cox gave a briefing to explain the process of acquiring the landfill. It
was also advised that there will be a Special Meeting of the Board of Directors on
Wednesday, February 14, 1996. Committee members also inquired about the status of
the Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization. The Director of Engineering reported that the
survey for the Space Utilization Study is underway, and should be complete in
approximately two weeks. The results, along with an update on the entire project, will
then be presented to the Ad Hoc Committee sometime near the end of February. He also
reported that the asbestos abatement will be getting started on the old laboratory in the
near future.
(14) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A
SUBSEQUENT MEETING
There were no matters discussed.
(15) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR
ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT
There were no matters discussed.
(16) NEXT MEETING
(a) Joint Boards of Directors Meeting -- Wednesday, February 28, 1996, at 7:30 p.m.
(b) Planning, Design and Construction Committee Meeting —Thursday,
March 7, 1996, at 5:30 p.m.
(c) Executive Committee Meeting — Wednesday, March 20, 1996, at 5:30 p.m.
(d) Joint Boards of Directors Meeting —Wednesday, March 27, 1996, at 7:30 p.m.
Minutes of Planning, Design and
Construction Committee Meeting
Page 5
February 1, 1996
(17) OTHER ANNOUNCEMENTS, IF ANY
None.
(18) ADJOURNMENT
The
/Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:40 p.m.
Qte.Y. L
Gail A. Cain
Planning, Design and Construction
Committee Secretary
FIWONLDpCYB1iEB143p1p9.MIN
County Sanitation Districts
+, of Orange County,California
V P.O. Box 8127 • 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127
Telephone:(714)962-2411
DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND
TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE
WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 7. 1996 - 5:30 P.M.
A meeting of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee of the
County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California
was held on February 7, 1996, at 5:30 P.M. at the Districts'Administrative offices.
(1) ROLL CALL
The roll was called and a quorum declared present as follows:
Committee Directors Present: Staff Present:
Pat McGuigan, Chair Gary Hasenstab, Director of Human Resources
Victor Leipzig, Vice Chair Ed Hodges, Director of Maintenance
Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications
Barry Denes Mark Esquer, Engineering Supervisor, Operations
Norman Z. Eckenrode Terri Josway, Safety & Emergency Response Mgr.
James M. Ferryman
Mark Murphy
Chris Norby
Sal Sapien
Committee Directors Absent:
John C. Cox, Jr., Joint Chair
(2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIRMAN PRO TEM. IF NECESSARY
No appointment was necessary.
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no comments from the public.
(4) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR, GENERAL MANAGER, ASSISTANT
GENERAL MANAGER OF OPERATIONS, DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS,
DIRECTOR OF MAINTENANCE AND DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES
(a) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
No report was given.
Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance
and Technical Services Committee Meeting'"
Page 2 of 4
February 7, 1995
(b) REPORT OF GENERAL MANAGER
No report was given.
(c) REPORT OF ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER OF OPERATIONS
No report was given.
(d) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS
Mark Esquer gave a brief report for Bob Ooten on the status of the
Districts' polymer contract. He informed the Committee that the subject
will be an item on the agenda for the meeting of the Joint Boards on
February 28, 1996.
(a) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF MAINTENANCE
Ed Hodges gave a brief update on the Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)
station.
Ed also presented the Agenda Calendar, Item (4c) of your agenda
package.
With regard to the Agenda Calendar, the Committee requested a variation
on the schedule to include a rotation of quarterly reports, one per month,
by each of the three departments. The Committee would like the reports
to include explanations of the techniques being implemented in the
individual departments to benchmark and measure how the department is
working toward the Districts' goal of a lowering the price per million
gallons treated. Charts are requested.
(f) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES
No report was given.
(5) APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 7. 1996
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting
held on February 7, 1996, it was moved, seconded and carried that said minutes
be deemed approved as mailed.
Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance
and Technical Services Committee Meeting
Page 3 of 4
February 7, 1996 _
(6) OLD BUSINESS
OMTS95.021: Quarterly Report on the Districts' Occupational Injury and
Near Miss Accident Rates.
Terri Josway gave a presentation and answered the questions of the
Committee members.
OMTS95-041a: Consideration of motion authorizing staff to enter into an
agreement with the South Coast Air Quality Management
District (SCAQMD) for a heavy-duty vehicle demonstration
project at no cost to the Districts, in prior approval by
General Counsel.
Ed Hodges gave a presentation after which it was moved, seconded and
carried to approve staffs recommendation.
OMTS95-041b: Consideration of motion authorizing staff to enter into a
Memorandum of Understanding with the South Coast Air
Quality Management District (SCAQMD) for a Heavy Duty
Vehicle Demonstration Project.
Ed Hodges gave a brief presentation after which it was moved, seconded
and carried to approve staffs recommendation.
(7) CLOSED SESSION
The Chair declared there were no items for closed session.
(6) OTHER BUSINESS, IF ANY
None.
(9) MATTERS ON WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT AT A
SUBSEQUENT MEETING
In addition to the changes to.the Agenda Calendar noted in (4)(e) above, the
Committee asked staff to report on the efficiency of Central Generation.
The Directors again thanked staff for the clean up of the Plant No. 2 "bone yard."
Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance
and Technical Services Committee Meeting
Page 4 of 4
February 7, 1996
(10) MATTERS A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA
FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT
None.
(11) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING DATES AND ITEMS TO BE
DISCUSSED AT THOSE MEETINGS
None.
(12) ADJOURNMENT
The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:25 P.M.
'a-Clarice M. Marcin
Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services
Committee Secretary
RAMDOCWI MK0WrSWINUIESV.
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County,CalNornia
P.O. Box 8127.108"Ellis Avenue
-,y Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127
Telephone: (7141962-2411
DRAFT
MINUTES OF FINANCE,
ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE
Wednesday. February 14, 1996. 5:30 P.M.
A meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee of the
County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County,
California was held on February 14, 1996 at 5:30 p.m., at the Districts' Administrative
Offices.
(1) ROLL CALL
The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
Committee Directors Present: Staff Present:
John C. Cox, Jr., Joint Chair Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager
George Brown, Chair Blake P. Anderson, Assistant General Manager
Jan Debay Judith A. Wilson, Assistant General Manager
James Flora Gary Hasenstab, Director of Human Resources
John M. Gullixson Steve Hovey, Director of Information Technology
Wally Lynn Bob Ooten, Director of Operations
Thomas Saltarelli Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Roger R. Stanton, Vice Chair Nancy Wheatley, Director of Technical Services
William G. Steiner Ed Hodges, Director of Maintenance
Peer Swan Michael D. White, Controller
Steve Kozak, Financial Manager
Committee Directors Absent: Linda Eisman, Training Manager
Greg Mathews, Principal Administrative Analyst
Burnie Dunlap Terri Josway, Safety & Emergency Response Mgr.
Mike Peterman, Human Resources Supervisor
Other Directors Present: Isiah Mitchell, Training Supervisor
Cymantha Atkinson, Financial Analyst
Lenora Crane, Committee Secretary
Others Present:
Tom Woodruff, General Counsel
Ruthann Moomy, Callan Associates, Inc.
Rita Seymour, PIMCO
Gordon Hally, PIMCO
(2) APPOINTMENT OF A CHAIRMAN PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee
Page 2
February 14, 1996 '
P
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
No comments were made.
(4) REPORTS OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR. GENERAL MANAGER. ASSISTANT
GENERAL MANAGERISI. DIRECTOR OF FINANCE/TREASURER, DIRECTOR
OF HUMAN RESOURCES, DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
AND GENERAL COUNSEL
(a) Report of the Committee Chair
The Committee Chair had no report.
(b) Report of the General Manager
The General Manager had no report.
(c) Report of Assistant General Manager - Operations
The Assistant General Manager - Operations had no report.
Reoort of Assistant General Manager -Administration
Judy Wilson, Assistant General Manager, Administration, announced that
a manila envelope was placed before each Director containing the
Districts' new Employee Handbook, a red book entitled "Human Resources
Policies and Procedures," and a copy of the Resolution adopted by the
Boards. Every Districts' employee was sent this information, and all of our
managers and supervisors will receive training on the policies and
procedures. This will ensure that everyone is in compliance and has a
good understanding of what is expected.
(d) Report of the Director of Finance/Treasurer
Finance Director/Treasurer Gary Streed referred to his report contained in
the agenda package which provided a history of the Districts' refunding on
its variable rate debt. With the successful substitution of the Liquidity
Providers on the 1992 Refunding COPs, Moody's has restored the
Districts' Aaa rating. *The average daily rate paid in the first six months of
FY 1995-96 has been approximately 3.76%. As of today, that rate has
dropped to 3.05%, with 3.25% on the refunding.
Mr. Streed advised that the Treasurer's Report will be given later in the
evening and will appear as a New Business numbered item, in order to
facilitate carrying it forward to the Joint Boards.
Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee
Page 3
February 14, 1996
v
In conclusion, Mr. Streed indicated that expanded reports will be given by-
Callan Associates, the Districts' third-party Investment Advisor, and Pacific
Investment Management Company, the Districts' External Money
Manager, regarding the Districts' performance over the first six months.
(a) Report of the Director of Human Resources
The Director of Human Resources had no report.
(f) Report of the Director of Information Technology
The Director of Information Technology had no report.
(g) Report of General Counsel
General Counsel had no report.
(5) APPROVAL OF MINUTES -
It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the draft minutes of the
January 10, 1996, meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources
Committee.
(6) OLD BUSINESS
FAHR96-04 Consideration of motion to approve Resolution No. 96- .
extending benefit coverage for regular employees working a
reduced work week.
This item was brought back to Committee from the January 10, 1996 meeting
with a request for further information. In this supplemental report, Mr. Hasenstab
reported on the three areas raised by the Committee at the last meeting,
specifically, retirement benefits, prevalence of part-time employment in Orange
County and other industries, and job sharing. Mr. Hasenstab reported that part-
time employees working a minimum of 20 hours are currently covered under the
Social Security Act at 7.65% of their hourly rate. Social Security vs. the Districts'
retirement system would mean a cost avoidance of$6,400. Public agencies
surveyed by the League of California Cities indicated 38% of them provide part-
time benefits to their employees, with approximately 90% of other industries
providing these benefits. Time-off benefits are prorated based upon hours
worked. Job sharing has its pros and cons. To avoid problems, many of these
employees sign agreements regarding their benefits so there will be no issue.
The Districts' current Employee Benefit Program is specifically limited to full-time
employees by Resolution 95-105. Extending employee benefits on a prorated
basis to employees who would like to work a reduced work week would enhance
the Districts' organizational flexibility through job sharing, more accurately match
Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee
Page 4
February 14, 1996
P
workload requirements with work schedules, potentially reduce overtime costs, -
and offer a greater measure of equity to regular employees who do not work a
40-hour week. Staff recommended providing part-time employees with
entitlement to employee benefits prorated on the basis of 75 percent, if the
employee works on average 30 to 40 hours per week, and 50 percent, if the
employee works 20 to 30 hours per week.
After discussion, it was moved, seconded and duly carried, with two abstentions,
two nays, and four ayes, to recommend amending the provisions of Resolution
95-105 to allow the proration of benefits to part-time employees, and authorize
staff to amend MOD's, health plan Summary Plan Documents, and other
administrative policy and procedure manuals as necessary, to the Joint Boards of
Directors for further consideration.
FAHR96-09 Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Report dated
January 4. 1996 re the Joint Agreement of the County of
Orange. the Official Investment Pool Participants' Committee
and Each Option A Pool Participant: and consideration of
Resolution No. 96- approving said Agreement.
Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager-Operations, reported this item had
been held over from the FAHR Committee's January 10, 1996 meeting pending
receipt of the County's Financial Disclosure Statement. That statement has been
released and the Joint Agreement, the Disclosure Statement and Plan of
Adjustment are coincident with each other. Mr. Anderson advised that the
Districts are about 6% of the Pool claims, with about $1.3 billion in total claims.
By approving the Agreement, it allows the County to improve its position, it
improves our place in line in receiving litigation proceeds from Merrill Lynch and
others, and gives the schools super priority in that litigation recovery. On an
immediate basis, withheld proceeds of$6.2 million held by the County under the
existing Comprehensive Agreement would be released to the Districts, and the
undisputed portion of the County Administered accounts amounting to $1.3
million will be released immediately.
On January 3, 1996, the Orange County Investment Pool (OCIP) Committee
reached final agreement with the County on all of the details of the "Joint
Agreement of the County of Orange, the Official Investment Pool Participants'
Committee and Each Option A Pool Participant" for the resolution of claims
against the County of Orange dated December 18, 1995. The Joint Agreement
has been conveyed to all Option A participants (the 190 schools, cities, special
districts and other public entities that signed the Option A version of the
Comprehensive Settlement Agreement that was approved in May 1995)for their
individual consideration and approval.
Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee
Page 5
_y
February 14, 1996
After discussion on this item the Committee moved, seconded and duly carried -
with one nay vote, to recommend that the Joint Boards approve the "Joint
Agreement Proposed by the County of Orange for the Resolution of Pool-Related
Claims of Option A Pool Participants, and Other Related Matters."
(7) NEW BUSINESS
(Please Note: Though the following items were acted on in another sequence,
the minutes will reflect them in numerical order for tracking purposes.)
FAHR96-10 Consideration of motion to renew Boiler & Machinery
Insurance for the period March 1. 1996 to March 1. 1997, with
American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance (Kemper
Insurance Group), in an amount not to exceed $79,698.
Steve Kozak, Financial Manager, reported that the Districts' Boiler & Machinery
insurance coverage is due for renewal on March 1, 1996. Robert F. Driver
Associates, the Districts' Broker-of-Record, recommends the Districts renew its
Boiler and Machinery Insurance with Kemper Insurance for a renewal period
effective March 1, 1996 to March 1, 1996, in an amount not to exceed $79,698.
The renewal premium adjustment will allow for increases in Districts' property
values and is only $2,307 higher than last year's. Driver's recommendation is
based on their recent survey which indicates there is a limited number of
available underwriters still providing Boiler and Machinery coverage and, those
that still do provide this coverage are imposing high deductibles and premiums for
large underwritings such as the Districts.
It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend renewal of Boiler &
Machinery Insurance for the period March 1, 1996 to March 1, 1997, with
American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance (Kemper Insurance Group), in an
amount not to exceed $79,698.
FAHR96-11 Consideration of motion to receive and file PIMCO's First
Quarterly Performance Report. Investment Management
Program.
Steve Kozak introduced Rita Seymour and Gordon Hally of Pacific Investment
Management Company (PIMCO), the Districts' extemal money manager, who
gave an overview of their company's background, services, processes,
procedures, reporting techniques and strategies.
Also in attendance was Ruthann Moomy, of Callan Associates, Inc., the Districts'
third-party Investment Advisor. Ms. Moomy described Callan's responsibilities to
the Districts' and reviewed the Districts' First Quarterly Performance Report.
It was moved, seconded and duly carried to receive and file this report.
Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee
Page 6
February 14, 1996
d
FAHR96-12 Consideration of motion to receive and file staff summary
report on training.
Judy Wilson introduced Linda Eisman who was hired in November 1995, to fill the
position of Training Manager. Linda Eisman summarized the Districts' Training
Program for the Committee using a slide presentation. Terri Josway, the
Districts' Safety & Emergency Response Manager, demonstrated the use of a
multi-media computer program on hazard awareness as a training tool. The
program allows for testing with a pre-test and post-test feature. The cost to
operate this equipment is expected to be as little as $1 per employee. The
Training Program is aimed at addressing past problems identified in the Ernst &
Young Study completed in 1995, along with recommendations made in other past
studies. A centralized record keeping system has begun, and a Training Advisory
Committee with representation across departments was formed in September
1995.
Ms. Eisman introduced Isiah Mitchell, who was recently hired to fill the newly
established Training Supervisor position. This position supports the Training
Manager position. The Training Division will be coordinating and centralizing
training functions, identifying cost-effective methods and providing data base
administration and management of Districts-wide training.
It was moved, seconded and duly carried to receive and file this item.
FAHR96-13 Consideration of motion to waive Districts' policy in order to
retain former employee on a work-order basis.
The Districts' Human Resources Policies and Procedures states that any former
employee who retires from the agency and forms a business in which he or she is
sole proprietor, may not be retained to provide service directly to the Districts for
a period of one year subsequent to their last day of employment. Ms. Tuchman
requested a waiver of this policy in order to retain Corinne Berenson on a work-
order basis.
Ms. Berenson, a long-time employee, has been working part-time since April
1995. Her in-depth knowledge of the agency makes her a valuable asset.
Providing support on an as-needed basis represents a significant savings to the
Districts over part-time employment.
It was moved, seconded and duly carried to waive the Districts' policy in order to
retain Corrine Berenson on a work-order basis.
Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee
Page 7
February 14, 1996
v
FAHR96-14 Consideration of motion to receive and file Treasurer's
Report for the month of December 1995.
Gary Streed, Districts' Treasurer, reviewed the quarter ended December 31, 1995
Performance Monitoring Reports. Total investments amount to $367,805,049.
All Investment Policy requirements are being complied with and performance to
date exceeds the index rates.
It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve and forward this report to
the Joint Boards.
FAHR96-15 Consideration of motion to review, approve and file the Mid-
. Year Report prepared by staff for the period ending
December 31. 1996.
Mike White, Controller, introduced his report enclosed in the agenda packet. The
bound book is the Districts' first comprehensive Mid-Year Report for the period
ending December 31, 1995. The report consolidates both the financial and
operational accomplishments of the Districts at the midpoint of the 1995-96 fiscal
year.
Due to time constraints, it was moved, seconded and duly carried to table this
report until the March 13, 1996 meeting.
FAHR96-16 Consideration of motion to approve Proposed update to the
Districts' Fiscal Policy Statements.
Mike White explained that the Fiscal Policy Statements are used to formally
define the goals for the financial operations of the Districts and provide the
Directors with tools for financial decision-making. The Fiscal Policy was used as
a guide in the 1995-96 budget, which also included the status of the Districts'
compliance with each of those statements. After reviewing the adopted Fiscal
Policy statements, staff is proposing five additional policy statements to ensure
the Policy is current and relevant to today's operations. Mr. White reviewed the
additional Fiscal Policy Statements.
After discussion on this item, it was moved, seconded and duly carried to adopt
the proposed update to the Districts' Fiscal Policy Statements with a change to
the statement regarding training opportunities to read, 'To provide training
opportunities for available jobs within the organization, to the extent possible, for
those employees . . ."
Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee
Page 8
February 14, 1996
P
FAHR96-17 Consideration of motion to review and approve 1996-97
Budget Assumptions for use in preparation of Districts' 1996-
97 Budget.
Mike White advised that certain assumptions are necessary as a foundation for
developing the Districts' budget. The assumptions guide the Board of Directors
and Districts' staff in determining the level of wastewater treatment services that
will be provided to the community and how these services will be funded.
After review and discussion of the 1996-97 Budget Assumptions, it was moved,
seconded and duly carried to approve the 1996-97 Budget Assumptions and their
use in the preparation of the 1996-97 Budget, with a change to the fourth Budget
Assumption to read, ". . . earnings on the investment of the Districts' idle
operating cash and reserves will be budgeted at six percent."
FAHR96-18 Consideration of motion to waive Districts' policy in order to
retain former employee on a work-order basis.
The Districts' Human Resources Policies and Procedures states that any former
employee who retires from the agency and forms a business in which he or she is
sole proprietor, may not be retained to provide service directly to the Districts for
a period of one year subsequent to their last day of employment. Mr. Hovey
requested a waiver of this policy in order to retain Steve Fanizza on a work-order
basis.
Mr. Fanizza, a Districts' employee of five years standing, recently resigned his
position as Programmer Analyst to further his career as an independent software
consultant. Mr. Hovey requested Mr. Fanizza be retained on a work-order basis
in order to minimize the impact of Mr. Fanizza's resignation and to provide
uninterrupted support to Technical Services only until a permanent replacement is
recruited.
It was moved, seconded and duly carried to waive the Districts' policy in order to
retain Steve Fanizza on a work-order basis.
(8) CLOSED SESSION
There was no closed session required.
(9) OTHER BUSINESS. IF ANY
None.
Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee
Page 9
February 14, 1996
(10) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A
SUBSEQUENT MEETING
No reports were requested.
(11) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE
AGENDA FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT
None.
(13) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING DATES AND ITEMS TO BE
DISCUSSED AT THOSE MEETINGS
The next Committee meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, March 13, 1996.
(14) ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned
at 7:15 p.m.
Lehora Crane
Finance, Administration and Human
Resources Committee Secretary
J:%W PDOC\FINICRANEWPC.MLGIFAHR.%kl 6.MINWIFAHR2.%
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County,California
• P.O.Box 8127 a 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127
Telephone: (714)962-2411
DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 21, 1996, AT 5:30 P.M.
A meeting of the Executive Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13
and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Wednesday, February 21, 1996. at the Districts'
Administrative Office.
(1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT:
Present: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel
John Sauvajot, Consultant
Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair
Pat McGuigan, Chair, District 1 and STAFF PRESENT:
OMTS Chair
John J. Collins, Chair, District 2 and Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager
PDC Chair Blake P. Anderson, Asst. Genl. Mgr.
George Brown, FAHR Chair Judith A. Wilson, Asst. Genl.. Mgr.
Sal A. Sapien, Chair, District 3 Gary Slreed, Director of Finance
Jan Debay, Chair, District 5 Steve Kozak, Financial Manager
James Ferryman, Chair, District 6 Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary
Barry Hammond, Chair, District 7
Victor Leipzig, Chair, District 11
John Gullixson, Chair, District 13
Thomas Saltarelli, Chair, District 14
William Steiner, County Supervisor
Don R. Griffin, Past Joint Chair
Absent:
John Cox, Jr., Joint Chair
Roger Stanton, County Supervisor
.J
Minutes of the Executive Committee
Page 2
February 21, 1996
2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
In the absence of Chair Cox, Vice Joint Chair Peer Swan was appointed Chair pro tem.
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no comments by any member of the public.
(4) APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of the January 17, 1996 Executive Committee meeting were approved as drafted.
(5) REPORTS OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR, GENERAL MANAGER, AND GENERAL COUNSEL
(a) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
There was no report by the Committee Chair or Chair pro tem.
(b) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
The General Manager reported that the next Directors' Workshop on the Strategic Plan
is tentatively scheduled for Saturday, May 4, 1996 from 9 to 12. The issues to be
addressed are water conservation and reclamation.
(c) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
The General Counsel had no report.
(6) The Committee moved to address the agenda items as follows:
(b) EXEC9"1: Consideration of motion to receive and file draft Feasibility Study on
Consolidation.
Judy Wilson presented the findings and recommendations of the draft Feasibility Study
prepared by Ford Sauvajot Management Group. This item was last before the Boards
of Directors in July 1995, and at that time staff recommended that the nine districts be
consolidated into one district. In October 1995, this issue was included as one of the
critical goals for 1996.
There are many regional concerns that must be addressed, including the growing public
concern over the number of special districts serving the needs of the California
residents, as evidenced by the introduction of the Pringle Bill in Sacramento.
The benefits of consolidation include streamlining governance; public perception;
average user fees could be reduced; and receiving better bond ratings.
The major issues at this time are govemance of the new district and equalization of
rates, as well as the issue of District 14 and IRWD.
Minutes of the Executive Committee
Page 3
February 21, 1996
The new district would be consolidated pursuant to California Government Code
pertaining to consolidation or reorganization of Districts, and the governance of the new
district would be organized pursuant to either Section 4730 or 4730.1 of the California
Health and Safety Code. If the new district is organized under Section 4730, there
would be 24 members—one member from each of the 20 cities, one from each of the
three sanitary districts and one representing the unincorporated areas of Orange County.
IRWD would not have a seat on the board. If formed under Section 4730.1, there would
be 30 members—one member from each of the 23 cities (including Garden Grove,
Westminster and Costa Mesa), one from each of the three sanitary districts, one from
each of the water districts that provide sewer service, and one county representative.
Under either section the terms and conditions of existing agreements remain.
The only alternatives to the above would be a special legislative act, or amending
Section 4730 or 4730.1.
Al this time the consultant is recommending organization under Section 4730.1 and
including all nine districts in the organization. In the event that the Boards decided to
proceed under Section 4730 instead, there are several options available to deal with
District 14: 1) organize without District 14 by consolidating 8 districts and providing
services through a services agreement with District 14; 2) dissolve District 14 and
establish that area as a special zone within IRWD; 3) consolidate into 2 districts-8
districts into one and District 14. There would be a joint board of directors,joint
operating agreements between District 14 and the consolidated districts.
The other major issue is equalization of user fees. Currently, these fees differ from
district to district. Reserves would be maintained and commingled, except for
District 14, whose reserves are handled pursuant to the November 1995 agreement.
Operating expenses and capital projects would be combined. Nine revenue zones could
be established (maintaining existing District boundaries) until such time as rates are
equalized, rates could be equalized over a period of time.
The subject of debt was also discussed. There is currently$408 million in COPS and
$60,000 in General Obligation Bonds. The consultant recommended that the COP debt
be assumed by the consolidated district and the GO bonds be retired. Another option
would be to create improvement Districts for each issuance, assign the debt accordingly
and retire the GO bonds.
The time table is as follows:
LAFCO Application submittal April 1996
Completion of Consolidation September 1996
Implementation July 1997
Judy also mentioned that each existing District would be asked to pass a resolution
approving the consolidation. If one District chooses to oppose, the application can still
go ahead and LAFCO may condition approval on inclusion of that District.
Minutes of the Executive Committee
Page 4
February 21, 1996
Don McIntyre mentioned that a good reason for including the water districts in the new
organization would be to help with the water conservation and reclamation plans to be
considered by the Directors in May as part of the strategic planning effort.
Mr. Sauvajot said that it was his opinion that LAFCO would probably not accept the idea
of two districts (consolidating eight districts into one and District 14—IRWD).
Director Gullixson expressed concern about getting the issue of user fees before the
Directors and addressing the impacts, District by District. He stated that he does not
support equalization of fees.
Director Sapien stated that because staff is involved with so many issues, he moved that
staff complete the landfill and bankruptcy issues and delay any action on consolidation
until after the landfill and bankruptcy issues are resolved.
Director Hammond indicated that he was would like to hear one compelling reason to
continue the consolidation effort.
Don McIntyre indicated that he is concerned about the Pringle Bill as well as the State's
Constitution Revision Commission that is concerned about the number of governments
in California. The Districts sent a letter to Speaker Pringle stating that we are studying
the consolidation issue. Don also stated that we should continue to do so before we are
forced to by others in a manner we may not agree with.
Director Collins said that there are indeed political influences, and that consolidation is
the right thing to do because it is an opportunity to reduce governance, it makes sense,
and he favors continuing the effort.
Director Saltarelli indicated that he cannot accept the equalization of fees and would not
attempt to sell the idea to his constituents.
Director Leipzig supported the process of consolidation even though it may not save
money, and favors forming zones for as long as is necessary.
Director McGuigan stated that she thought most of the work had been done and it
wouldn't serve any purpose to delay. Judy Wilson indicated that about 85 percent of the
work has been completed.
The motion was amended to allow staff to complete the work on the consolidation and
report back to the Executive Committee in September. It was moved, seconded and
passed.
(c) EXEC96-03 Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Report re Status of
Application to LAFCO for the Formation of a County-wide Sanitation District for
Solid Waste Management.
Blake Anderson discussed the activities since last Wednesday's Special Board Meeting
wherein the Directors authorized staff to submit the MOU with qualifications. On
Thursday he talked with Jan Mitlermeier, County CAD, and advised her of the actions by
Minutes of the Executive Committee
Page 5
February 21, 1996
the Board. Our formal offer will be given to the County tomorrow, February 22, in the
form of an MOU and responses to some 40 questions from the County. Jan will be
reviewing the offer for about two weeks and will then schedule a study session with the
Board of Supervisors in the second week of March, giving them three alternatives to
consider. 1) the County would take some of our ideas, including contracting operations
and downsizing administration; 2) approving Sanitation Districts' offer of acquisition of
the system; 3) consider the policy matters relating to the purchase of the landfill system
by private sector. Two weeks after the study session (about the end of March), the
issue will be agendized.
Jan said that she will not submit the request to submit the LAFCO application until the
time the Supervisors formally consider our offer.
A package will be sent to all city managers this week that will include the terms. There
was additional discussion about acquiring 90% flow control. Chair pro tem Swan
indicated that he felt staff should continue to prepare for the possibility of acceptance of
our offer by the supervisors by preparing an RFP for forming a team to assist with the
bond sale and take it to the FAHR Committee for approval.
Director Gullixson asked that a poll be taken to find out where we stand, and how much
support there is for our taking over the landfills.
There are three regional meetings being scheduled to explain the offer to the city
managers and our consultants will be available to assist in discussions.
Director Debay complemented staff on the excellent staff report on the LAFCO
application and stated that it should be the only information the County should need to
make a decision.
Director McGuigan stated that many cities are in the process of preparing their budgets
and will need the detailed cost information.
It was moved, seconded and passed to receive and file the Staff Report.
(a) Consideration of motion to receive and file staff report dated February 5, 1996 re
the Joint Agreement of the County of Orange, the Official Investment Pool
Participants' Committee and Each Option A Pool Participant; and consideration of
Resolution No. 96-_, approving said Agreement.
Blake Anderson stated that the three parts of the comprehensive settlement agreement
have been completed. The Districts have received 80% of their investment. In
September 1995 the Joint Agreement went to Sacramento and was modified. In
December the action was renewed and the County issued the Plan of Adjustment and
the Disclosure Statement. The Joint Agreement transfers $15 million from OCTA to the
County, $15 million from the County Landfill System to the County, and $12 million from
Harbors, Beaches and Parks, Flood Control District and Redevelopment Agencies. The
County will have to issue new debt.
Minutes of the Executive Committee
Page 6
February 21, 1996
As a result of approving the agreement, the Districts place in the receiving line for -
litigation proceeds is improved, and we remove future litigation against the County. As
soon as the Bankruptcy Judge accepts the agreement, we will receive withheld monies
in the amount of about $8 million.
It was moved and seconded to move the approval of the agreement to the full Boards.
Director Gullixson slated that our position is not necessarily advanced and that there
have been several rulings by Judge Ryan that affect the County's position. He also
questioned how good the County's ctaims are.
Director McGuigan questioned General Counsel Tom Woodruff about how the pool
attorneys fees are being paid. Tom indicated that there are several different structures,
depending on whether a city is in a subgroup or not. Most of the fees will be paid from
any recovered monies subject to approval by the Court. The Sanitation Districts will be
paying about 6%.
After calling the motion, it passed with a 7-2 vole.
(7) CLOSED SESSION
There was no need for a Closed Session.
(8) OTHER BUSINESS
There was no other business.
(9) MATTERS TO BE REPORTED ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING
There were none.
(10) MATTERS ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT.
There were none.
(11) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS
The next Executive Committee meeting is scheduled for March 20, 1996.
(12) ADJOURNMENT
The Chair pro tem declared the meeting adjourned at 7:10 p.m.
milted by
J a Tappan, Secrorg
pB MIN
V
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
FEBRUARY 28, 1996
Agenda Item (11 )(b)(1 ): PDC95-34: Consideration of the following actions
relative to Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2,
Job No. P2-35.3; Process Area Fire Protection,
Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job Nos. P1-
385 and 132-46; and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job
No. P255:
(a) Verbal report of Director of Engineering .
(b) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for
said project, changing the date for receipt of bids from January 9, 1996 to January 16,
1996, clarifying contractor's license requirements, and making miscellaneous technical
clarifications.
(c) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications for
said project, making miscellaneous technical clarifications.
(d) Consideration of Resolution No. 96-19, receiving and filing bid tabulation and
recommendation, and awarding contract for Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2,
Job No. P2-35-3; Process Area Fire Protection, Signage and Water Distribution System
Modifications at Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job Nos. Pt-38-5 and P246; and Chemical and
Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-55, to Sverdrup Civil, Inc. in
the total corrected amount of$13,195.500.00.
Summary
Seven bids were received on January 16, 1996 for these projects. Sverdrup Civil, Inc.submitted the
corrected low bid of$13,196,500.00. The PDC Committee authorized the award of a construction contract
at the Joint Boards meeting to the lowest responsive bidder in an amount not to exceed the approved
engineer's estimated amount at the November 2, 1995 PDC Committee meeting.The low bid is under the
approved Engineer's estimated amount of$13,200,000.00.
The plans and specifications were modified through two addenda that accommodated changes requested
by the City of Huntington Beach Water Department,clarified details of construction, and extended the bid
date by one week from January 9 to January 16, 1996.
Staff Recommendation
A. That the Joint Boards of Directors recommend approval of Addenda Nos. 1 and 2 to the plans and
specifications for the subject project.
B. That the Joint Boards of Directors receive,file bid tabulation,and award a contract for
Maintenance Building at Plant No.2,Job No.P2-35-3;Process Area Fire Protection,Signage and
Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant Nos. 1 and 2,Job Nos. P1-38-5 and P246;and
Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No.2,Job No. P2-55 to Sverdrup Civil,
Inc.in the total corrected amount of$13,196,500.00.
J\WPDOCBSWG9TFEB9611161
• COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
ai ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
January 24, 1996 IBBAA ELO6 AVENUE
va.Box 812➢
FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 627262127
p418622An
STAFF REPORT
PDCSS-34: Consideration of the following actions re Maintenance Building at Plant No.2,Job
No.P2-35-3; Process Area Fire Protection,Signage and Water Distribution System
Modifications at Plants Nos.1 and 2,Job Nos.P7-38-5 and P2.46;and Chemical and
Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No.2,Job No.P2-55.
Summary
The construction bid package,Warehouse Building at Plant No.2,Job No. P2-35-2;Maintenance Building
at Plant No.2,Job No. P-35-3;Process Area Fire Protection,Signage and Water Distribution System
Modifications at Plant No.2,Job No.P248;and Office Trailer Relocations at Plants Nos. 1 and 2,
Specification No.M-044(Rebid)and M-044-1,was first approved by the Planning,Design,and Construction
(PDC)Committee at the January 5, 1995 meeting. The final approval was to be solicited from the General
Board in February 1995,however,due to the bankruptcy,the hem was withheld from the agenda.
Subsequent to the above events,the Committee took actions to further delay the project due to questions
regarding the warehouse building and the process area fire protection,signage and waste distribution
system modifications.
Subsequent Board actions have occurred which led to the reorganization of the original package. In June
1995,the Directors approved an amended agreement with Frontier Pacific Insurance Company to settle the
dispute regarding Office Trailer Relocations at Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Specification No.M-044 and awarded
this project for construction. The Warehouse Building was removed from the package at the direction of
the PDC Committee and the Ad Hoc Committee. The Ad Hoc Committee is further reviewing warehouse.
In June 1995,the Boards approved the PDC Committees affirmation of the need for the Process Area Fire
Protection,Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant Nos.1 and 2. Additionally,in April
1993,the Boards approved a professional services agreement with Black and Veatch to prepare plans and
specifications for Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications for Plant No.2,Job No. P2-55 which are
now complete.
The projects now included in this package are Maintenance Building at Plant No.2,Job No.P2-35-3;
Process Area Fire Protection,Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant Nos. 1 and 2,
Job Nos.P1-38-5 and P2-46; and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No.2,Job No.
P2-55. The Maintenance Building,the City Water Pump Station at Plant No.2 and portions of the Chemical
and Plant Water Facilities will be constructed in areas adjacent to each other. Since all the plans and
specifications for these projects are now complete,staff recommends bidding these facilities together to
eliminate construction coordination issues. Including the City Water Modifications at Plant No. 1 in this bid
package will allow for batter value since the equipment and materials required for the Plant 1 and Plant 2
projects are similar.
At the November PDC Committee meeting,the PDC Committee authorized the award of a construction
contract at the next Joint Boards meeting to the lowest responsive bidder in an amount not to exceed the
approved engineer's estimated amount.
Seven bids were received on January 16, 1996 for these projects. Sverdrup Civil,Inc.,submitted the
corrected low bid of$13,196,500.00. The low bid is under the approved Engineer's estimated amount of
$13,200,000.00.
The plans and specifications were modified through two addenda that accommodated changes requested
by the City of Huntington Beach Water Department,clarified details of construction,and extended the bid
date by one week from January 9 to January 16, 1996.
PDC95-34
Page 2
January 24, 1996
Staff Recommendation
A. That the Joint Boards of Directors recommend approval of Addenda 1 and 2 to the plans and
specifications for the subject project.
B. That the Joint Boards of Directors receive,file bid tabulation,and award a contract for Maintenance
Building at Plant No.2,Job No.P2-35-3;Process Area Fire Protection,Signage and Water
Distribution System Modifications at Plant Nos.1 and 2,Job Nos.P1-38-5 and P2-46;and
Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No.2,Job No.P2-55,to Sverdrup Civil,
Inc.in the total corrected amount of$13.196,500.00.
WS:jac
JAWPDOC¢NGT2-35-3W WARD.S.RPT
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
January 16, 1996 01 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
r 11:00 a.m.
2 Addenda 1044 CLUB AVENUE
PO BOX 6121
BID T A R 11 I A T I n N FOUMAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 8272e.8121
0141 aa2.2411
Jobs Nos. P2353, P1-38.5 & P2.46, and P2-55
PROJECT TITLE: Maiptananra Reading at Plant No 7 Anh Nn P7AR.9 Pronaas An,, E r, .
Protection Cignagn A Water nintrihntian Syntam Mndifiratinns at Plants Nna 1
Fnr�lily Mad'frarinne
at PI nt Nn. A .Inh Nn P7_R5
PROJECT
DESCRIPTION: New fuln'ritaruenra R,'Id•ng now city warier pump Arai nn and d'ctdh nine
evatem and 'mnTnvemantc and raw rhAmiral dne'nn fndl'tiac At Plant Nn 7
City water numn station imnrnyemAnta and dictrih,it na ystpnn n wore
at Plsnt Nn 1
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE: SIg 2miIU= BUDGET AMOUNT: SIX 8715Onn
TOTAL
CONTRACTOR BID
1. Sverdrup Civil, Inc., Costa Mesa, CA 13,196,500.00••
2. S. J. Amoroso Construction Co., Inc., Irvine, CA 14,700,733.00
3. Pascal & Ludwig Engineers, Ontario, CA 14,821,000.00
4. Kiewit Pacific Co., Santa Fe Springs, CA 14,989,605.00
5. Ziebarth & Alper and
C.S. Alper Construction Co., a joint venture, Huntington Beach, CA 15,655,000.00
6. Margate Construction, Carson, CA 15,961,000.00
7. Advance Constructors, division of Zurn Constructors, Inc. Upland CA 16,086,731.00
8.
9.
10.
"corrected total
I have reviewed the proposals submitted for the abov rolect and find that the low bid is a responsible
bid. 1, therefore, recommend award to Sverdrup Ci , In . in the bi amount of $13,196,500 as the
lowest and best bid.
David A. Ludwin, P.E.
Director of Engineering
BID SUMMARY
JOB NOS. P2-35-3, P1-38-5, 122-06 and P2-55
Bid Date: January 16, 1996
SYerGrup CIWI,IM. 5.1.Amoroso Pascal&Lu4wlg Engineers AcNa=Conprumas Dmioc,,
Comhuc0on Co.,Inc. alum Consbuclois.Irtc.
Item 017. UN1 Price Total Pure Unit Price Total Price Unit Price Total Pace Unit Pace Total Price
No.
1 1 LS 250.= 250.000.00 250.OD0 250.000.00 25D,0W 250,000.00 25D.000 250.000.00
2 1 LS SOW 5,000.W 1,W0 1000.00 2 W0 2 W0.00 B WO UDD.00
3 1 LS 5,000,000 5,000,W0.00 6.707,874 6,707,874.00 4,705,000 4,705,OOg.00 5.700.000 5,700,000.00
4 1 LS 5,000 S,WO.W 4,ODD 4,0D0.00 20D0 1 2.000.00 40,000 40.000.00
5 1 1 LS 1 1,8W.W0 1,800,000.00 2.100,000 2,100,000.00 22DDDDO 2,2W.WO.00 I 2.3W,W0 2,300,000.00
6 1 LS 2,500.000 2,500.000.W 2.000.00D 2,000,000.00 2556000 2.556.000.00 2.500.00O 2.500.OW.00
7 1 LS 300.000 3W,O00.W 126.257 126.257.W 2900W 29D.000.00 301.000 301.0W.00
8 1 LS 120,000 120,000.W 29.702 29.702.00 700DO 70,0M00 90.631 90.631.00
9 1LS 20.000 20.000.W 100,OW 100,OW.00 150000 150,000.00 150,OW 150,WO.01)
10 1 LS 2.3W.O00 2,300,0W.00 2,300,OW 2,300,OW.00 3945000 3,945,000.W 3,GB5,100 3,685,100.00
11 1 LS B50.000 W0,O0D.00 1,000.OW 1.000.OW.00 5750W 575.000.00 900,OW 9W.000.00
12 SW 11 S,SW.W 40.7 20.350.W 36 18.WO.W W .W 62 31, O
Cy
13 5W 11 5,500.00 39.6 19,800.00 33 16,50D.00 51 25.500W
Cy
14 500 11 5.500.00 38.5 19.250.00 33 16,500.00 46 23.000.00
Cy
SUlaoial 13,166,5=0— 14,678,233.00 14,796.WO.00 16,W4.23100
BWIEer's All ll $30,WW W W0 O. S22,SW. f25, .W W f82,5W.
Risk Im A
TOTAL 613.196.500.00" $14,70D.733.00 $14.821,00O.00 $16.086,73100
"Corre total.
BID SUMMARY
JOB NOS. P2-35-3, P1-38-5, P246 AND P2-55
BID DATE: JANUARY 16, 1996
I0ew0 Pacific Co. ZlebeM 8 Alper and C.S.Alper wrgate Conatmetion
ConsImceon Co.,a pIM venture
Item Cot. Unit Price Total Pd. Unit Price Total Pd. Unu Price Total Price
No.
1 1 LS 250,000 250.000.W 250000 250.000.00 25ODDO 250,000.00
2 1LS 2000 2.0010.00 3WW 30,000.00 20000 20,000.00
3 1 LS 5W7000 S.8W.000.410D 77640DO 7,754,0011.00 5721000 5.721.000.00
a 1 LS 20DO 2,000.00 4DDDDO 4W.OW.00 125W0 125,WO.00
5 1 LS 2WOD00 2,800,000.00 15DDOW i.5W,W0.00 2400000 2,400.0101).00
6 1 LS 29DDDW 2,900,013D.00 22DDDDD 2.Y00,0100.W 26501M 2.65D.0W.00
7 1 LS 118250 118,25D.00 280000 260.0130.W 265800 205.000.W
8 1LS 28855 29,855.W 8WW 80,00O.00 8WW 80.011 .W
9 1LS 2WD 2.000.00 5WWD SW.WO.W 111W0 100.010O.W
10 1L6 I 230OWD 2,300,000.00 I 18WW0 1,800,000.00 345OWD 3,460.13W.01)
11 1LS 1000WD 1.000,000.01) 8WWD 000.11113000 800W0 8W.W0.01)
12 5WCY 70 35,000.00 30 15.0O.00 20 10,01DO.W
13 SW CY W 30,000.W 30 15,000.00 15 7,5W.W
14 500 CY 55 27,500.00 30 15.000.W 15 7.500.00
Subtotal 14,963,605.00 15,629,WO.W 15,886,003.00
Builder's All Risk 826,DW.00 $26,WO.W $75,WO.00
Insumr e
TOTAL S14W9.605W S15,655,(=00 S15W."m
Y
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
7F FEBRUARY 28, 1996
Agenda Item (11)(b)(2)(a): QMTS95-041a: Consideration of
motion authorizing the General
Manager to enter into an agreement
with South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD)for a Heavy-Duty
Vehicle Demonstration project at no cost to the Districts, in form approved by
General Counsel.
Summary
In September 1995, the Districts received confirmation that our proposal to do a
heavy-duty demonstration project, using monies supplied by the SCAQMD, was going to
be approved. In December 1995, the SCAQMD Board of Directors met and approved the
project.
The contract between the Districts and the SCAQMD has been reviewed by our General
Counsel and includes all of their suggested modifications. (Please see attached contract.)
Ed Hodges, Director of Maintenance will give a brief presentation on this item. Also,
please see attached staff report.
Budget Information
There is no budgetary impact.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends the OMTS Committee approve this item to be moved forward for
authorization by the Joint Boards for staff to enter into an agreement with the Southern
California Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD)for a heavy-duty vehicle
demonstration project.
OMTS Committee Recommendation
The OMTS Committee recommends the Joint Boards authorize staff to enter into an
agreement with the Southern California Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD)for a
heavy-duty vehicle demonstration project.
J:1W PDDCW%G WTE B961i 1 B2-A
' n
V
�b
January 23, 1996
STAFF REPORT
OMTS95-041a: Consideration of motion authorizing staff to enter into an
agreement with the South Coast Air Quality Management
District (SCAQMD) for a heavy-duty vehicle demonstration
project at no cost to the Districts, in prior approval by General
Counsel.
In September 1995, the Directors will recall that staff submitted a proposal to the
SCAQMD for the Heavy Duty demonstration project. In December 1995, the SCAQMD
Board of Directors met and approved our project. As part of this proposal, the
SCAQMD will be providing $447,000 in funds. The mechanics of this proposal have
been discussed in great detail a number of times and as a result will not be discussed
here.
The Districts have been requested to enter into a contract with the SCAQMD for this
work. Attached for your guidance and information is the Final version of the Contract.
Staff as well as our General Counsel have been working with the SCAQMD staff in
preparing this contract for your approval.
Ed Hodges, Director of Maintenance will give a brief presentation on this item.
Budget Information
There is no monetary impact to executing this contract.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends the OMTS Committee approve this item to be moved forward for
authorization by the Joint Boards for staff to enter into an agreement with the Southern
California Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) for a heavy-duty vehicle
demonstration project.
EEH:cm
R:WVPDOCt33101EHtOMTS%95-D41A.SR
CSDOC 9 P.O.Box 8127 0 Fountain Valley.CA 92 7 28-812r 0 (7t<)962 2411
-� Page -1-
Contract No.96066
SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
CONTRACT
This Contract consists of 13 pages.
1. PARTIE -The parties to this Contract are the South Coast Air Quality Management District (referred to here
as 'DISTRICT') whose address Is 21865 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765, and County Sanitation
Districts of Orange County (referred to here as 'CONTRACTORI whose address Is 10844 Ellis Avenue,
Fountain Valley, CA 92708-7018.
2. RECITALS
A. DISTRICT is the local agency with primary responsibility for regulating stationary source air pollutlon in
the South Coast Air Basin in the State of California. DISTRICT is authorized to enter Into this Contract
under California Health and Safety Code Section 40489. DISTRICT desires to contract with
CONTRACTOR for services described in Attachment 1 -Work Statement, attached here and made a part
here by this reference. CONTRACTOR warrants that it Is well-qualified and has the experience to provide
such services on the terms set forth here.
B. CONTRACTOR Is authorized to do business In the State of California and attests that it is in good tax
standing with the California Franchise Tax Board.
C. Ail parties to this Contract have had the opportunity to have this contract reviewed by their attorney.
D. CONTRACTOR agrees to obtain the required licenses, permits, and all other appropriate legal
authorizations from all applicable federal,state and local jurisdictions and pay all applicable fees.
3. PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS
A. CONTRACTOR warrants that it holds all necessary and required licenses and permits to provide these
services. CONTRACTOR further agrees to Immediately notify DISTRICT in writing of any change in its
licensing status.
B. CONTRACTOR shall submit reports to DISTRICT as outlined In Attachment 1 - Work Statement All
_ reports shall be submitted in an environmentally friendly format: recycled paper: stapled, not bound;
black and white, double-sided print; and no three-ring, spiral, or plastic binders or cardstock covers.
DISTRICT reserves the right to review, comment.and request changes to any report produced as a result
of this Contract.
C. CONTRACTOR shall perform all tasks set forth in Attachment 1 -Work Statement, and shall not engage,
during the term of this Contract in any performance of work that Is in direct or indirect conflict with duties
and responsibilities set forth in Attachment 1 -Work Statement.
D. CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for exercising the degree of skill and care customarily required by
accepted professional practices and procedures subject to DISTRICTS final approval which DISTRICT
will not unreasonably withhold. Any costs incurred due to the failure to meet the foregoing standards, or
otherwise defective services which require re-performance, as directed by DISTRICT, shall be the
responsibility of CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR'S failure to achieve the performance goals and
objectives stated in Attachment 1-Work Statement, is not a basis for requesting re-performance unless
work conducted by CONTRACTOR Is deemed by DISTRICT to have failed the foregoing standards of
performance.
E. CONTRACTOR shall ensure, through its contracts with any subcontractor(s), that employees and agents
performing under this Contract shall abide by paragraph D above.
4. TERM - The term of this Contract Is from January 2, 1996 to May 1, 1999, unless further extended by
amendment of this Contract In writing. No work shall commence until this Contract is fully executed by all
parties.
Page -2-
5. TERMINATION-In the event any party taus to comply with any tens or condition of this Contract or fails to fl
provide the services In the manner agreed upon by the parties. Including, but not limited to,the requirements
of Attachment 1 -Work Statement, this failure shall constitute a breach of the Contract The nonbreaching
party shall either notify the breaching party that it must cure this breach or provide written notification of Its
intention to terminate this Contract Notification shall be provided In the manner set forth In Clause 11. The
nonbreaching party reserves all rights under law and equity to enforce this Contract and recover any
damages. DISTRICT reserves the right to terminate this Contract for nonbreach and will reimburse
CONTRACTOR for actual costs incurred In performance of this Contract through the effective date of
termination for nonbreach.
6. INSURANCE- CONTRACTOR Is permissibly self-Insured and will maintain self-Insurance In accordance with
applicable provisions of California law as evidenced by certificate of self-Insurance. CONTRACTOR sfa0
maintain such coverage during the term of this Contract and any Wensions thereof. If CONTRACTOR falls
to maintain the required Insurance coverage, DISTRICT reserves the right to terminate the Contract or
purchase such additional Insurance and bill CONTRACTOR or deduct the cost thereof from any payments
owed to CONTRACTOR.
7. INDEMNIFICATION - CONTRACTOR agrees to hold harmless. Indemnify, and defend DISTRICT, Its officers,
employees, agents, representatives, and successors4n4nterest against any and all loss, damage, cost, or
expenses which DISTRICT, Its officers, employees, agents, representatives, and successors-In-Interest may
Incur or be required to pay by reason of any Injury or property damage caused or Incurred by
CONTRACTOR, Its employees, subcontractors, or agents in the performance of this Contract
8. TERMS AND CONDITIONS
A. CONTRACTOR shall obtain oofurding as follows: Pima Gro Systems, Inc., One Hundred Ninety-Two
Thousand Seven Hundred Dollars ($192,700) direct; Southern California Gas Company, Ninety-Three
Thousand Five Hundred Dollars($93,500) In-kind; Power Systems Associates, Eight Hundred Thirty-EIgM
Thousand Two Hundred Fifty-Nine Dollars (5838,259) in-kind; Department of Energy, Eighty Thousand
Dollars ($80,000) in-kind.
B. If CONTRACTOR fails to obtain funding In the amounts referenced above from the respective parties,
then DISTRICT reserves the right to renegotiate or terminate this Contract
C. CONTRACTOR agrees to provide funding to cost share this project in the amount of Eight Hundred
Thirty-Five Thousand Three Hundred Seventy-Four Dollars ($835,374). If CONTRACTOR falls to provide
funding in this amount,then DISTRICT reserves the right to renegotiate or terminate this Contract
9. - PAYMENT
A. DISTRICT shall pay CONTRACTOR a fast price of Four Hundred Forty-Seven Thousand Dollars
(W7,000)for work performed under this Contract in accordance with Attachment 2-Payment Schedule,
attached here and Included here by reference. Payment shall be made by DISTRICT to CONTRACTOR
within thirty (30) days after approval by DISTRICT of an Invoice prepared and furnished by
CONTRACTOR showing services performed and referencing tasks and deliverables as shown In
Attachment 1 -Work Statement. and the amount of charge claimed. Each Invoice must be prepared In
duplicate, on company letterhead, and list DISTRICTS Contract number, period covered by invoice,and
CONTRACTORS social security number or Employer Identification Number and submitted to: South
Coast Air Quality Management District, Attn:Maria Belknap.
B. An amount equal to ten percent (10%) shall be withheld from all charges paid until satisfactory
completion and Oral acceptance of work by DISTRICT.
Page •3-
10, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIOHTS -Thle and full ownership rights to any software, documents, or reports
developed under this Contract shall at all times remain with CONTRACTOR. Such material is agreed-to be
CONTRACTOR'S proprietary Information.
A. Rights of Technical Data-DISTRICT shall have the unlimited right to use technical data. Including material
designated as a trade secret, restating from the performance of services by CONTRACTOR under this
Cwaram CONTRACTOR shall have the right to use data for Its own benefit
B. Copyright-CONTRACTOR agrees to grant DISTRICT a royalty frea, nonexclusive, Irrevocable license to
produce, translate, publish, use, and dispose of all copyrightable material first produced or composed In
the performance of this Contract
11. NOTCES -Any notices from either parry to the other shall be given in writing to the attention of the persons
listed below, or to other such addresses or addressees as may hereafter be designated In writing for notices
by either party to the other. Notice shall be given by certified, express, or registered mad, return receipt
requested,and shall be effective as of the date of receipt Indicated on the return receipt card.
DISTRICT: South Coast Air Quality Management District
21865 E.Copley Drive
Diamond Bar,CA 91765
Attn: Cindy Sullivan
CONTRACTOR: County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
10844 Ella Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92700-7018
Attn: Board Secretary
12 EMPLOYEES OF CONTRACTOR
A. DISTRICT reserves the right to review the resumes of any of CONTRACTORS employees selected to
perform the work specified here and to disapprove CONTRACTORS choices. CONTRACTOR warrants
that It will employ no subcontractor without written approval from DISTRICT. CONTRACTOR shall be
responsible for the cost of regular pay to Its employees, as well as cost of vacation, vacation
replacements,sick leave, severance pay and pay for legal holidays.
_ B. CONTRACTOR, its officers, employees, agents, or representatives stall In no sense be considered
employees or agents of DISTRICT, nor shall CONTRACTOR, its officers, employees, agents, or
representatives be entitled to or eligible to participate in any benefits, privileges, or plans, given or
extended by DISTRICT to its employees.
13. CONFIDENT1ALfTY- It Is expressly understood and agreed that DISTRICT may designate In a conspicuous
manner the Information which CONTRACTOR obtains from DISTRICT as confidential and CONTRACTOR
agrees to:
A. Observe complete confidentiality with respect to such Information, Including without limitation, agreeing
not to disclose or otherwise permit access to such Information by any other person or entity In any
manner whatsoever, except that such disclosure or access shall be permitted to employees of
CONTRACTOR requiring access in fulfillment of the services provided under this Contract
B. Ensure that CONTRACTORS officers, employees, agents, representatives, and Independent contractors
are Informed of the confidential nature of such Information and to assure by agreement or otherwise that
they are prohibited from copying or revealing, for any purpose whatsoever, the contents of such
Infor attlon or any part thereof, or from taking any action otherwise prohibited under this paragraph.
C. Not use such Information or any part thereof in the performance of services to others or for the benefit of
others In any form whatsoever whether gratuitously or for valuable consideration, except as permitted
under this ContracL
D. Notify DISTRICT promptly and in writing of the circumstances surrounding any possession, use, or
knowledge of such information or any part thereof by any person or amity other than those authorized by
this paragraph.
Page -4- D
E. Take at CONTRACTOR'S expense, but at DISTRICTS option and in any event under DISTRICTS control,
any legal action necessary to prevent unauthorized use of such information by any third party or-entlly
which has gained access to such Information at least in part due to the fault of CONTRACTOR.
F. Take any and all other actions necessary or desirable to assure such continued confidentiality and
protection of such information.
G. Prevent access to such by any person or entity not authorized under this Contract
H. Establish specific procedures In order to fulfill the obligations of this paragraph.
14. PUBLICATION
A. DISTRICT shall have the right of prior written approval of any document which shall be disseminated to
the public by CONTRACTOR in which CONTRACTOR utilized information obtained from DISTRICT In
connection with performance under this Contract.
B. Information, data, documents, or reports developed by CONTRACTOR for DISTRICT, pursuant to this
Contract,shall be part of DISTRICTS public record unless otherwise Indicated. CONTRACTOR may use
or publish, at its own expense, such information provided to DISTRICT. The following acknowledgment
of support and disclaimer must appear in each publication of materials, whether copyrighted or not,
based upon or developed under this Contract.
This report was prepared as a result of work sponsored, paid for, in whole or in part, by
the South Coast Air Quality Management District (DISTRICT). The opinions, findings,
conclusions, and recommendations are those of the author and do not necessarily
represent the views of DISTRICT. DISTRICT, Its officers, employees, contractors, and
subcontractors make no warranty, expressed or Implied,and assume no legal liability for
the Information in this report. DISTRICT has not approved or disapproved this report
nor has DISTRICT passed upon the accuracy or adequacy of the Information contained
herein.'
C. CONTRACTOR shall Informs officers, employees, and subcontractors Involved In the performance of
this Contract of the restrictions contained herein and require compliance with the above.
15. NON-DISCRIMINATION - In the performance of this Contract CONTRACTOR shall not discriminate in
recruiting, hiring, promotion, demotion, or termination practices on the basis of race, religious creed, color,
national origin,ancestry,sex,age,or physical or mental disability and shall comply with the provisions of the
CaTrfomia Fair Employment & Housing Act (Government Code Section 12900 at seq.), the Federal Civil
Rights Act of.1964 (P.L 80-352) and all amendments thereto, Executive Omer No. 11246 (30 Federal
Register 12319), and all administrative rules and regulations Issued pursuant to said Acts and Order.
CONTRACTOR shall likewise require each subcontractor to comply with this paragraph and shall include in
each such subcontract language similar to this paragraph.
16. SOLICITATION OF EMPLOYEES-CONTRACTOR expressly agrees that CONTRACTOR shall not,during the
term of this Contract, nor for a period of six months after termination, solicit for employment, whether as an
employee or Independent contractor,any person who is or has been employed by DISTRICT during the term
of this Contract without the consent of DISTRICT.
17. PROPERTY AND SECURITY - Without limiting CONTRACTOR'S obligations with regard to security,
CONTRACTOR shall comply with all the rules and regulations established by DISTRICT for access to and
activity in and around DISTRICTS premises.
1a. ASSIGNMENT-The rights granted hereby may not be assigned, sold, licensed, or otherwise transferred by
either parry without the prior written consent of the other, and any attempt by either parry to do so shall be
void upon Inception.
19. NON-EFFECT OF WAIVER-The failure of CONTRACTOR or DISTRICT to insist upon the performance of any
or all of the terms, covenants, or conditions of this Contract, or failure to exercise any rights or remedies
hereunder, shall not be construed as a waiver or relinquishment of the future performance of any such terms,
covenants, or conditions, or of the future exercise of such rights or remedies, unless otherwise provided for
herein.
Page -5-
20. ATTORNEYS' FEES -In the event any action Is filed In connection with the enforcement or interpretation of
this Contract, each party shall bear its own attomeys'fees and costs.
21. FORCE MAJEURE -Neither DISTRICT nor CONTRACTOR shall be liable or deemed to be in default for any
delay or failure In performance under this Contract or interruption of services resulting, directly or indirectly,
from acts of God, civil or military authority, acts of public enemy, war, strikes, labor disputes, shortages of
suitable parts, materials, labor or transportation, or any similar cause beyond the reasonable control of
DISTRICT or CONTRACTOR.
22. SEVERABILffY-In the event that any one or more of the provisions contained In this Contract shall for any
reason be held to be unenforceable in any respect by a court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall
not affect any other provisions of this Contract, and the Contract shall then be construed as If such
unenforceable provisions are not a part hereof.
23. HEADINGS - Headings on the paragraphs of this Contract are for convenience and reference only, and the
words contained therein shall in no way be held to explain, modify, amplify, or aid In the Interpretation,
construction, or meaning of the provisions of this Contract.
24. DUPLICATE EXECUTION -This Contract is executed in duplicate. Each signed copy shall have the force
and effect of an original.
25. GOVERNING LAW-This Contract shall be construed and Interpreted and the legal relations created thereby
shall be determined In accordance with the laws of the State of California. Venue for resolution of any
disputes under this Contract shall be Los Angeles County,California.
26, CITIZENSHIP AND ALIEN STATUS
A CONTRACTOR warrants that it fully complies with all laws regarding the employment of aliens and others,
and that its employees performing services hereunder meet the citizenship or alien status requirements
contained In federal and state statutes and regulations including, but not limited to, the Immigration
Reform and Control Act of 1986 (P.L 99-603). CONTRACTOR shall obtain from all covered employees
performing services hereunder all verification and other documentation of employees' eligibility status
_. required by federal statutes and regulations as they currently exist and as they may be hereafter
amended. CONTRACTOR shall have a continuing obligation to verify and document the continuing
employment authorization and authorized alien status of employees performing services under this
Contract to insure continued compliance with all federal statutes and regulations.
B. Notwithstanding paragraph A above, CONTRACTOR, in the performance of this Contract, shall not
discriminate against any person in violation of 8 USC Section 1324b.
C. CONTRACTOR shall retain such documentation for all covered employees for the period described by
law. CONTRACTOR shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless DISTRICT, its officers and employees
from employer sanctions and other liability which may be assessed against CONTRACTOR or DISTRICT,
or both in connection with any alleged violation of federal statutes or regulations pertaining to the
eligibility for employment persons performing services under this Contract.
27. ENTIRE CONTRACT -This Contract represents the entire agreement between the parties hereto related to
CONTRACTOR providing services to DISTRICT and there are no understandings, representations, or
warranties of any kind except as expressly set forth herein. No waiver, alteration, or modification of any of
the provisions herein shall be binding on any party unless In writing and signed by the parry against whom
enforcement of such waiver, alteration, or modification is sought
Page -6-
G
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Contract have caused this Contract to be duly executed on their
behalf by their authorized representatives,
SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGECOUNTY
By By:
Jon D. Mikels, Chairman of the Board
Date: Date:
ATTEST:
Jackie Dix, Clerk of the Board Approved as to form:
THOMAS L. WOODRUFF,
DISTRICTS'COUNSEL
By
By
APPROVED AS TO FORM: TERRY C.A 1NDRUS
Peter Greenwald, District Counsel (�
ATTACHMENT 1
STATEMENT OF WORK FOR
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CONTRACTOR proposes to demonstrate a Caterpillar 3176B dual-fuel engine (31768)
in ten heavy-duty trucks used to transport municipal biosolids from Fountain Valley to
Kern County. The 3176E uses a small quantity of diesel to start the engine through low
RPM operation and then switches to natural gas (NG) operation. NG usage is
expected to be 90% or better. Ten trucks shall be repowered with the 3176B and three
control trucks shall continue to operate on standard 3176 diesel engines. Each truck
shall make the approximately 300-mile round trip to Kern County twice a day. Battelle
Memorial Institute shall provide technical support to the demonstration.
Demonstration vehicles shall be provided by Pima Gro Systems, Inc. (Pima Gro). Pima
Gro is currently under contract with CONTRACTOR to transport biosolids from
Fountain Valley to Kern County. The total cost of this demonstration is anticipated to
be $2,486,824. Co-sponsors include CONTRACTOR ($835,374-direct), the Gas
Company (SCG) ($93,500-in-kind), Pima Gro Systems, Inc. ($192,700-direct), Power
Systems Associates ($838,250-in-kind), the Department of Energy ($80,000-in-kind),
and DISTRICT ($447,000-direct). Specific tasks necessary to accomplish this
demonstration are defined.below.
Task 1 Memorandum of Understanding
CONTRACTOR shall develop a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between
CONTRACTOR, SCG, Pima Gro Systems, Inc. (Pima Gro), and Power Systems
Associates (PSA). The MOU shall detail the responsibilities of each party, including
the specific trucks to be repowered, the engines and fuel systems to be installed, and
the disposition of the 3176 and 3176E engines at the end of the demonstration.
CONTRACTOR shall provide DISTRICT with a copy of the fully-executed MOU.
Task 2 Engines and Vehicles
2.1 CONTRACTOR shall coordinate delivery of ten GMC trucks to PSA facilities in
the Basin for installation of Caterpillar 3176B dual-fuel engines in ten trucks, along with
on-board fuel storage and delivery systems. CONTRACTOR anticipates that this
installation process shall proceed at the rate of two trucks per month.
2.2 Upon completing engine installation, CONTRACTOR, in cooperation with Pima
Gro, shall conduct acceptance testing on each truck to ensure that each truck operates
safely and provides acceptable performance. Acceptance testing shall include, but not
be limited to, takeoff and acceleration tests, and braking tests.
2.3 CONTRACTOR, in cooperation with Pima Gro, shall identify three control
vehicles. These diesel-fueled trucks shall be identically (or nearly identical) configured
as the CNG trucks. The control vehicles shall be operated on similar routes with
similar loads to permit accurate comparison of operating data.
2.4 CONTRACTOR shall coordinate efforts with PSA to optimize the 3176B engine
emissions to 2.5 g/bhp-hr. NOx. CONTRACTOR may accomplish this using
dynamometer facilities located at PSA In the event that the PSA dynamometer is
unavailable, CONTRACTOR may use other facilities.
1
Task 3 Refueling Facility Establishment
3.1 CONTRACTOR shall install a natural gas refueling facility at its Fountain Valley 9
facility. The fueling facility shall consist of, but not be limited to, the following major
components:
a) One 500-1,000 standard cubic feet per minute non-tube compressor
package.
b) Two dual hose CNG dispensers (fast fill) to allow for private and public
access to the fueling facility.
c) Three CNG storage vessels. Vessels must meet American Society of
Mechanical Engineers specifications.
d) One dual-tower, suction-side gas dryer.
e) One electrical switchboard.
f) Two fuel card readers, to accommodate private and public access.
3.2 CONTRACTOR shall consult with appropriate representatives of SCG to
determine the applicable technical specifications for each fueling facility component.
3.3 CONTRACTOR shall issue a Request for Proposals (RFP) for design,
permitting, and construction of the refueling facility. CONTRACTOR, in conjunction
with SCG, shall form a construction management team to manage all aspects of the
engineering design phase for the facility, including but not limited to, adherence to
applicable codes and safety and environmental regulations, development of equipment
specifications, RFP preparation, bid analysis, equipment procurement, contractor
selection, construction management, start-up and debug services, and operator
training.
Task 4 Field Test and Data Collection
4.1 CONTRACTOR shall develop a field test plan for the CNG and diesel control
trucks. This test plan shall include, but not be limited to, route(s) to be traveled for
each vehicle, refueling requirements, and vehicle scheduling requirements. The plan
shall also include information regarding chassis manufacturer and model, engine
specifications, and vehicle load characteristics.
4.2 CONTRACTOR shall organize and conduct a one-to two-hour training class for
all of its personnel who shall operate, service, or otherwise be involved with the CNG
trucks. Training shall include, but not be limited to, issues related to CNG vehicle
operation, maintenance, refueling procedures, and data collection requirements.
4.3 CONTRACTOR shall make arrangements with PSA to provide spare parts
inventory for the CNG engines. CONTRACTOR may store these parts at its facility or
at PSA facilities.
4.4 CONTRACTOR shall collect operational and maintenance data on each of the
ten CNG trucks and the three diesel control vehicles. This data shall include, but not
be limited to, mileage accumulated, driving cycle characteristics, fuel consumption
(including information on percentage or ratio of CNG and diesel use under actual
vehicle operating conditions), driver and service personnel reaction to operation and
maintenance of the vehicles and engines, and a record of repairs and maintenance
performed.
2
b Task 5 Emissions Testing
5.1 CONTRACTOR shall develop an emissions lest plan with which to coordinate
and manage chassis emissions tests during the term of the demonstration. This plan
shall include, but not be limited to, identification of the proposed testing facility, number
of vehicles to be tested, test cycles to be used, and exhaust species to be measured.
5.2 Prior to the start of vehicle operation, CONTRACTOR shall obtain and provide to
DISTRICT all engine emissions data available for the CNG and control engines. This
data may be obtained from the engine manufacturer or from an independent source.
5.3 CONTRACTOR shall prepare a final emissions report, to be incorporated in the
final report. In the final emissions report, CONTRACTOR shall compare chassis
dynamometer lest data obtained in Task 5.1 with the engine test data obtained in Task
5.2. The project goal is an engine with exhaust emissions of 2.5 g/bhp-hr. or less for
NOx and with fuel economy and power comparable to corresponding diesel engines.
CONTRACTOR shall analyze all emissions and performance data, and provide an
assessment on the emissions impact of the demonstration vehicles over their useful
life.
3
DELIVERABLES
In addition to the deliverables set forth in the Statement of Work, CONTRACTOR shall
deliver the following to DISTRICT under this Contract:
1. Two stapled copies of each bi-monthly progress report due by the 10th day of
each month following the two-month reporting period. CONTRACTOR shall submit one
copy of each bi-monthly progress report to DISTRICTS Program Supervisor and one
copy to DISTRICTS TA Staff Specialist assigned to contracts in conjunction with the
invoice for the same period. Each bi-monthly progress report shall include, but not be
limited to, the following:
a. Reference to DISTRICT contract number, project number and title.
b. Reporting time period (month, year).
c. Description of work completed during the reporting period, a discussion of
problems encountered and how those problems were solved, and other relevant
activities.
d. Discussion of work planned for the next reporting period.
e. Discussion of project status with respect to time schedule and steps
f. Discussion of cost status with respect to budget status and work completed to
date, costs to date, explanation of any overruns, and steps being taken to bring
costs back into line.
2. One copy of the draft final report shall be submitted to DISTRICTS Program
Supervisor, and one copy to DISTRICTS TA Staff Specialist assigned to contracts no
later than February 15, 1999. This document shall, in conformance with the California
Public Records Act (Government Code Section 6250 at seq.) be considered in the
public domain. Any trade secret information may be submitted to DISTRICT in a
separate report in which the document is identified as containing trade secrets on every
page. DISTRICT agrees to treat trade secret information in accordance with its Public
Records Act guidelines relating to trade secret information. In this report,
CONTRACTOR shall document all test results and provide a discussion of the data and
results along with a statistical analysis that either recommends validation or invalidation
of the test protocol. Specifically, this report shall contain, but not be limited to, the
following:
a. Reference to DISTRICT contract number and project title.
b. Project background and objectives.
c. A detailed description of the scope of work.
d. Emissions data, analysis, and interpretations, including correlation between
manufacturer testing and chassis testing results.
e. Technical description of the dual-fuel engine technology, and its performance
in the demonstration.
f. Summary of results of each task.
g. Appendices of all test data and calculations.
4
h. Description of the use and performance of each dual-fuel truck in comparison
to the three control vehicles.
I. A discussion of operational economics, including fuel economy, cost of fuel,-
and maintenance and repair costs.
j. A description and discussion of the CNG fueling facility built and utilized in this
demonstration, including but not limited to, physical description of the facility,
cost of construction and operation, maintenance and repair record of the facility,
any safety issues and how they were dealt with, and a description of the current
and projected utilization of the facility.
k. Recommendations for the future use of the demonstrated dual-fuel technology
in CONTRACTOR'S operations; manufacturer plans for commercialization; and
any known plans for technology improvements.
I. A set of 35 mm color slides documenting the demonstration, including
installation of the engines into vehicles, vehicles in operation, vehicles fueling,
emissions testing, and the fueling facility.
3. Two copies of the final report, incorporating the comments of DISTRICT, shall be
submitted to DISTRICT'S Program Supervisor and one copy shall be submitted to
DISTRICTS TA Staff Specialist assigned to contracts no later than March 31, 1999.
4. Each year for the life of this Contract, CONTRACTOR shall submit a two-page
progress update on the funded project for distribution at DISTRICT'S annual
CONTACTOR'S' Review Meeting, held at DISTRICT headquarters. At DISTRICTS
discretion, CONTRACTOR shall make a 15-minute oral presentation about the project
at said meeting. DISTRICT shall provide CONTRACTOR with sufficient advance notice
on the exact dates, procedures, formatting, etc., for the written summary and oral
report.
5
MILESTONES
TASK Due Date AMOUNT
Project Kickoff Meeting January 16, 1996
Execute Participant MOU (Task 1) March 1, 1996 $15,000
Vehicle Test Plan April 1, 1996 $20,000
Emissions Test Plan (Task 3) May 15, 1996 $20,000
Finish Fueling Facility Construction (Task 3) August 1, 1996 $50,000
Complete Engine Repowering (Task 2) November 1, 1996 $210,000
Fueling &Vehicle Training November 15, 1996 $12,662
Complete Year One Field Test November 15, 1997 $25,000
Chassis Emissions Testing January 31, 1996 $25,000
Vehicle Field Test (Task 4) December 1, 1998 $25,000
Draft Final Report February 15, 1999 $10,000
Final Emissions Report (Task 5) February 15, 1999 $10,000
Final Report April 1, 1999 $25,000
Total Project Amount $447,000
6
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
FEBRUARY 28, 1996
Agenda Item (11 )(b)(2)(b): OMTS95-o41b: Consideration of
motion authorizing the General
Manager to enter into a Memorandum
of Understanding with South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD)
for a Heavy Duty Vehicle Demonstration Project in form approved by General
Counsel.
Summary
As part of our contract with the SCAQMD and our proposal for the Heavy Duty
Demonstration Project, we are required to execute a Memorandum of Understanding
(MOU) with all of the parties involved in the project.
Ed Hodges, Director of Maintenance will give a brief presentation on this item. Also,
please see the attached staff report.
Budaet Information
Executing the MOU is one of the milestones that will allow the Districts to bill the
SCAQMD and receive $15,000.00.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the OMTS Committee authorize staff to enter into a
Memorandum of Understanding with the SCAQMD for a Heavy Duty Vehicle
Demonstration Project,
OMTS Committee Recommendation
The OMTS Committee recommends that the Joint Boards authorize staff to enter into a
Memorandum of Understanding with the SCAQMD for a Heavy Duty Vehicle
Demonstration Project.
J:%WPDOCIBSNG TEa 111 B2-B
u
January 23, 1996
STAFF REPORT
OMTS95-041b: Consideration of motion authorizing staff to enter into a
Memorandum of Understanding with the South Coast
Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD) for a Heavy
Duty Vehicle Demonstration Project.
At the September OMTS Committee meeting, staff presented the proposal that was
submitted to the SCAQMD for some of the AB 2766 funds. At the February OMTS
Committee meeting, the Committee requested that the Joint Chairman sign the contract
between the Districts and SCAQMD. Task 1 of that contract calls for the Districts to
execute a participant Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) on or before March 1,
1996.
The SCAQMD agreed to pay $15,000.00 for achieving this milestone.
Attached for your guidance and information is a copy of the MOU that we have put
together with all of the participants. Additionally, our General Counsel has given very
valuable input to this process and agrees as to its form.
BUDGET INFORMATION
The attached MOU is one of the milestones called out in our contract with the
SCAQMD. Executing this agreement will enable us to invoice the SCAQMD for
$15,000.00.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the OMTS Committee authorize staff to enter into a
Memorandum of Understanding with the SCAQMD for a Heavy Duty Vehicle
Demonstration Project.
EEH:cm
R:%W PDOCV13101EH\OMRS19S941 B.SR
CSDOC 0 P.O.Box$127 0 Fountain Valley,CA 9272E-4127 0 (714)e62a411
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
This MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ("MOU") is entered into
as of this 26th day of Jaunuary, 1996, by and among the County Sanitation Districts of
Orange County ("CSDOC"), Southern California Gas Company ("SoCalGas"), Pima Gro
Systems, Inc. ("Pima Gro"), Power Systems Associates ("PSA"), Battelle ("Battelle") and
South Coast Air Quality Management District("SCAQMD")(collectively, the "Parties").
RECITALS
WHEREAS, CSDOC has submitted a proposal to SCAQMD for
Alternative Fuels Heavy-Duty Truck Demonstration (RFP#9495-31) dated August 29,
1995 a copy of which is attached as Exhibit A hereto(the "Proposal");
WHEREAS, CSDOC contracts with Pima Gro for the transport of
municipal biosolids by Pima Gro trucks from CSDOC's Fountain Valley treatment plant to
destinations in Kern County, Imperial County and Yuma, Arizona;
WHEREAS, Pima Gro is willing to make up to ten of Pima Gro's trucks
(the "Fleet") available to participate in the use of the Caterpillar dual fuel 3I76B engine as
described in the Proposal, subject, however, to the execution of an agreement between
Pima Gro and CSDOC;
WHEREAS, the Parties desire that a CNG refueling station be installed at
CSDOC's Fountain Valley facility as described in the Proposal;
WHEREAS, SoCalGas has extensive experience in installing and managing
natural gas fueling stations;
": usucuss�saoua.m
e
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY AGREE AS -
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. This MOU sets forth the responsibilities of each of the Parties with
respect to the proposed demonstration of the Caterpillar 3176B dual fuel engine (the
"Engine")in the Fleet, as more fully described in the Proposal (the "Project").
SECTION 2. Subject to the execution of a contract by the SCAQMD, CSDOC
commits to develop a CNG refueling station (the "Station") at CSDOC's Fountain Valley
facility. The Station shall be utilized by the Fleet to fuel vehicles to haul municipal
biosolids to locations in Kem County and CSDOC shall also seek to expand the natural
gas base load at the Station through its own vehicle use and use by nearby communities
and private fleets.
The Station shall be designed and constructed in a manner to ensure safe, reliable
fuel delivery that meets required quality specifications, allows flexibility for future
expansion and minimizes operating expenses. The basic components of the Station shall
be as are set forth in Exhibit B hereto.
SECTION 3. PSA shall:
(a) Not later than December 31, 1996, complete emission optimization of the
Engine and test the Engine on an engine dynamometer at BKM Engineering in San Diego,
California, using the 13-mode steady-state test procedure for emissions. PSA shall also
arrange for Engine certification testing at Southwest Research Institute, with a target
Engine certification level of 2.5 glbhp-hr NO,
O:\YSFu'\SJS\SJSIOISB.O]C -2
4 �
(b) Install the Engine and design and install an onboard fuel storage and
a-CPrb as
delivery system in each truck of the Fleet commencing within sixty (60) days after the date
of this MOU, and in accordance with the schedule set forth in Exhibit D hereto. Prior to
the installation of the Engine and the design and installation of the onboard fuel storage
and delivery system, PSA shall coordinate the design and the scheduling of installation
with Pima Gro. As the repowering of each truck in the Fleet is completed, Pima Gro shall
conduct acceptance tests on each truck to ensure that each truck operates safely and
provides acceptable performance to the approval of Pima Gro, which approval shall not be
unreasonably withheld.
(c) At its cost and expense, arrange for the disposition of the diesel engines
replaced by the Engines in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations and this
MOU.
(d) Use its reasonable best efforts to coordinate efforts to optimize the Engines
to 2.5 g/bhp-hr NO.;
(e) Arrange with the Engine manufacturer to provide spare parts inventory for
the Engines; and
(f) Identify, in consultation with Pima Gro and Battelle, a specific diesel
truck(s) to be used as a control vehicle(s) during the term of the Project (the "Control
Trucks"). The Control Trucks shall be configured as nearly identically as possible to the
Fleet and shall be operated on a route(s)that is similar to those of the Fleet.
J:\V560.2\SJS\SJa:Ol69.WC - J -
a y
SECTION 4. CSDOC shall:
(a) Determine the site location at CSDOC's facility at Fountain Valley for the
Station and, in consultation with Pima Gro, the public and private access to the Station, to
achieve optimum benefits,
(b) Develop, with the consultation assistance of SoCalGas, the Station. The
design shall include, but not be limited to, all site specifications, fueling needs, and
building and safety requirements,
(c) Procure and install, or cause to be installed, all necessary equipment at the
Station.
SECTION 5. SoCalGas shall:
(a) Develop the design documents for construction of the Station;
(b) Develop all technical specifications for the components of the Station;
(c) Provide CSDOC with all equipment specifications;
(d) Provide construction management services for the related gas services (i.e.,
gas main and service, metering and billing);
(e) Provide customized billing reports to monitor fuel consumption at the
Station for individual vehicles and fleets; and
(f) Provide formal and ongoing training related to safety, operation,
maintenance and fueling of the Fleet.
SECTION 6. In addition to the services SoCalGas shall provide as set forth in
Section 5 above, SoCalGas shall also provide consulting services to CSDOC in connection
with the permitting and construction of the Station. CSDOC shall compensate SoCalGas
for its consulting services at the rate set forth in SoCalGas' proposal to CSDOC. CSDOC
shall make payments to SoCalGas on a monthly basis as invoiced by SoCalGas for
0:\U$Z"kSJS\SJS101SB.WC 4
consulting services provided. Payments to SOCa1Ges shall be made not later than 30 days
after the receipt of the applicable invoice by CSDOC.
SECTION 7. Battelle shall:
(a) Act as the project manager for and be responsible for the development of a
field test plan, data collection, emission testing, and data analysis and dissemination, all in
accordance with the Proposal and this MOU.
(b) Develop a field test plan (the "FT Plan") in collaboration with Pima Gro,
PSA and CSDOC. The FT Plan shall be submitted to SCAQMD for approval. The FT
Plan shall provide an experimental design that leads to collection of data from which
statistically significant findings can be made. The FT Plan shall include operations such as
assigning routes for the Fleet and Control Trucks, fueling procedures and maintenance
procedures. The FT Plan shall also include procedures for collecting data on parameters
such as mileage accumulated, fuel consumption, driver and service personnel reactions,
maintenance and time out of services;
(c) Collect operations and maintenance data on each of the trucks of the Fleet
and the Control Trucks. The data shall be such data as specified in the FT Plan;
(d) Reduce collected data, validate such data and assemble a data base of
results of the Project.
(e) Develop an emission test plan (the "ET Plan") to provide emission tests for
the Fleet and Control Trucks. The ET Plan shall include, but not be limited to, emission
data available from the Engine manufacturer, anticipated testing schedules, test cycles and
procedures to be used, and identification of testing locations;
(1) Coordinate emission testing in accordance with the ET Plan;
o:wnuv.rsswoia.vx - 5 -
(g) Assemble a data base of the ET Plan test results;
(h) Provide information on Project progress and results to interested agencies
and organizations, including presentation of Project results at meetings and conferences,
on-site press events and other activities;
(i) Analyze all operation data to determine fuel economy, power,
performance, maintenance costs and reliability, and compare the same for the Fleet and the
Control Trucks;
6) Analyze emission data and compare emission levels from the Fleet to the
Control Trucks and to applicable emission standards;
SECTION 8. Battelle shall manage the Project to achieve the Projecfs objectives
(the "Project Manager"). The Project Manager shall prepare a Project plan that sets forth
a master schedule for the completion of each Parties, obligations hereunder. The Project
Manager shall monitor the progress of each of the Parties against the master schedule and
allocate resources, within the terms of this MOU, to accomplish the completion of the
Project.
The Project Manager shall prepare and submit to each of the Parties:
(a) Monthly progress reports on the technical and economic status of the
Project;
(b) Quarterly progress reports summarizing and analyzing the Project results,
achievement of milestones, preliminary findings and recommendations for completion of
the Project;
(c) A draft final report containing an executive summary and a detailed
discussion of the technical and economic results and conclusions of the Project. The draft
o:�ussuws�sss�mse.voc -6 -
final report shall be submitted at least 60 days prior to submission of the final report
referred to in(d)below;
(d) A final report that addresses all comments received on the draft final
report. The final report shall be submitted not later than April 1, 1999; and
(e) A set of 35mm slides documenting the Project.
The Project Manager shall make a presentation on the status of the Project at the
annual "Technology Advancement(TA) Contractor Review Meeting."
SECTION 9. The costs of implementing the Project and this MOU shall be paid
by each of the Parties as provided in the Cost Schedule set forth in Section 7 of the
Proposal and as modified herein.
SECTION 10.
(a) This MOU, including the rights and duties contained herein, shall not be
assigned, in whole or in part, by any of the parties without the prior written consent of
each of the other Parties.
(b) This MOU is not intended to create or evidence any partnership, joint
venture or similar relationship of any kind.
(c) This MOU shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws
of the State of California.
(d) This MOU is binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the Parties
hereto, their representatives, successors and permitted assigns.
(e) This MOU may be signed in one or more counterparts, all of which taken
together shall constitute one and the same agreement.
(f) This MOU may not be modified or amended except by a written agreement
executed by each of the Parties.
o:mzcu�smsw�"ue."oc - 7 -
SECTION 11. The Parties understand and agree that funding for the Project is
dependent on a grant of funds to CSDOC from SCAQMD in the amount of Four Hundred
Forty-Seven Thousand Dollars ($447,000). Except as provided in Section 6, and unless
otherwise agreed to, CSDOC's obligation to make payments to any of the Parties shall be
conditioned upon receipt of said funds from SCAQMD and shall be limited to the
following amounts:
(a) PSA—$192,700 to cover the cost of one-half of the purchase of the new
engines, plus$105,000 for installation and certification of the new engines.
(b) Battelle—$99,962 to cover the cost of testing, reporting and acting as
Project Manager. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY for
itself and on behalf of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have duly executed this MOU as of the
date first above written.
o:wssssws�smoue.oc: - 8 -
Approved as to Form: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
Thomas L. Woodruff ORANGE COUNTY for itself and on behalf of
District Counsel County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange
County, California
By
By
Title
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY
By
Title
PIMA GRO SYSTEMS
By
Title
POWER SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES
By
Title
BATTELLE
By
Title
SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY
MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
By
Title
b.V5Ei5`9J5\SJS:Ot58.ZC - 9
w
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
FEBRUARY 28, 1996
Agenda Item (11 )(b)(3): FAHR96-04 Consideration of Resolution
No. 96-20, Amending Resolution
No. 95-105, Extending Benefit Coverage For
Regular Employees Working A Reduced
Work Week
Summary
The Districts' current Employee Benefit Program is specifically limited to full-time
employees by Resolution 95-105. That Resolution specifies in the Definitions Article that
regular full-time employees are entitled to benefits as set forth in the resolution, and in
Section 38 that "The Districts shall provide health insurance coverage ... for the benefit
of regular full-time employees." A similar provision will be found in each of the
Memoranda of Understanding with the various employee groups.
Extending employee benefits on a prorated basis to employees who would like to work a
reduced work week would enhance the Districts' organizational flexibility through job
sharing, more accurately match workload requirements with work schedules, potentially
reduce overtime costs and offer a greater measure of equity to employees who do not
work a 40-hour week.
The current budget has a total of thirteen part-time positions, including one
Storeskeeper Assistant in Finance, seven Part-time Assistants in Technical Services,
and five Part-time Construction Inspectors in Engineering. The Districts' Employee
Benefit Program could be extended to part-time employees on a prorated basis.
Budget Considerations
The Districts currently pays 7.65% of the part-time employees' Social Security Tax. The
annual incremental cost of prorating additional benefits for a part-time position is
dependent upon the weekly hours worked. Based on the existing thirteen part-time
staff, the following table portrays the estimated additional expense associated with
extending the Employee Benefit Program. Depending on the hours worked the
incremental costs to the Districts is between $35,000 and $52,000 annually.
e
3D30 Hour 20-30 Hour Currently Paid by
Work Week Work Week %Total Benefits DieBicts7
Social Securily Tax $21,700 $14.600 7.65% Yea
Addidonal Benefit $52,000 $35,000 18.35% No
Program
Total Benefits $73,700 $49,600 26.00% No
Net AddRional $52,000 ; $35,000. —
ExpensetoDistricts
Table-Benefit Expersas for E Mng Thirteen Parr-Time Personnel
Recommendation
Provide part-time employees with entitlement to employee benefits prorated on the
basis of 75 percent if the employee works on average between 30 and 40 hours per
week on average, and 50 percent if the employee works between 20 and 30 hours per
week. Amend the provisions of Resolution 95-105 to allow the proration of benefits to
part-time employees, and authorize Staff to amend MOU's, health plan Summary Plan
Documents and other administrative policy and procedure manuals as necessary.
FAHR Committee Recommendation to Joint Boards of Directors
The FAHR Committee concurs with staffs recommendation.
J9W PDOCrBSAC961FEB96111 B-3
January 29, 1996
SUPPLEMENTAL STAFF REPORT
FAHR96-04: Consideration Of Resolution No. , Extending Benefit
Coverage For Regular Employees Working A Reduced Work
Week
At the January 10, 1996, meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human
Resource Committee, certain issues were raised and questions asked with regard to
the staff report proposing to extend benefit coverage to regular employees who may
work a reduced work week. Those issues include:
1. How the Orange County Retirement System relates to part-time
employees.
2. How prevalent the use of part-time employees is in Orange County and
elsewhere.
3. Potential problems associated with Job Sharing programs.
DISCUSSION
Retirement costs. The Districts currently employ thirteen individuals on a part-time
basis. After July 1, 1991, all state and local government employees not covered by a
retirement plan of their employer are covered by Social Security and Medicare. Since
our part-time employees did not participate in OCERS at that time, they were required
to pay the Social Security tax of 7.65 percent. The Districts is required to pay the
same amount.
As stipulated by law, the Districts must pay retirement or pension plan contributions
for part-time personnel. Currently we pay 7.65% Social Security tax for part-time
employees. This retirement "benefit" is currently less than the 9.89% rate paid by the
Districts to OCERS for each full-time position. Thus, there is no additional cost
attributed to retirement contributions for part-time employees. Indeed, as a result of
the different retirement systems, there is a $6,400 annual cost avoidance (based on
the existing staff of thirteen part-time positions). As the OCERS contribution
fluctuates annually, this savings will vary in future years.
CSDOC 6 P.O. Box 8127 0 Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 0 (714) 962.2411
FAHR96-04
Page 2
January 29, 1996
Part-time employment survey. In a survey of 34 agencies in Orange County,
thirteen (38 percent) were found to offer benefits to part-time workers (see
Attachment 1). A Hewitt Associates survey of 505 private sector employers found
that nearly 75 percent offered medical benefits, sick leave, vacation and holidays on
a prorate basis to employees working 30 hours or more per week. The primary
reason cited for offering part-time employment was because such work is "necessary
to meet business needs". Other reasons given include: a means to adjust for
changing workloads; and a tool to retain valuable employees.
Job Sharing. Job sharing is a form of regular part-time employment in which two
employees voluntarily share the duties and responsibilities of a single full-time
position. Job sharing can reduce overtime costs, improve attendance levels, enable
employees to fulfill family obligations more easily and encourage the retention of
experienced support staff employees. Job sharers can frequently be used to fill in for
absent workers, avoiding the additional cost of temporary help.
As with any part-time position, job sharing holds the potential for misunderstanding if
the individuals involved are not clear on the particular circumstances of their
employment relationship. For that reason, we currently require part-time employees
to enter into a Part-Time Employment Agreement (see Attachment 2) specifying their
contractual relationship with the Districts. This agreement would be modified to
include a prorated benefit schedule, and would be entered into by all part-time
employees.
The Operations Department is currently evaluating the potential for overtime cost
reductions that might be achieved through a Plant Operator Apprenticeship Program.
Participants in the program as envisioned would work part-time and receive training
while pursuing a formal course of study at an accredited school. Once sufficiently
trained, these individuals could augment full-time staff levels at approximately half the
hourly rate of a Plant Operator. These positions would also allow present staff a
greater flexibility to participate in cross training programs without necessarily incurring
overtime costs. Individuals graduating from the Apprenticeship Program would be
required to compete for full-time positions only when such positions became
available. The findings of this evaluation will be reported in detail at a later date.
GH:ps
g N pNh lftteevesV hrop en 96
Attachment 1
° Survey of Orange County Cities/Agencies with
Benefits for Part-Time Workers
January 18, 1996
City/Agency Benefits for PT Workers
Anaheim No
Brea Yes
Buena Park Yes
Costa Mesa No (only minimal leave benefits)
County Yes
Cypress Yes
Dana Point Yes (no medical)
Fountain Valley No
Fullerton Yes
Garden Grove No
Huntington Beach Yes
Irvine No
La Habra No
La Palma No
Laguna Beach No
Laguna Hills No
Laguna Niguel No
Lake Forest No
Los Alamitos No
Mission Viejo Yes
Newport Beach No (only PERS contrb)
O.C. Fire Yes
Orange Yes
Placentia No
S.J. Capistrano No (Except 3 special cases)
San Clemente Yes (no medical)
Santa Ana No
Seal Beach No
Stanton No (only leave benefits)
OCTA Yes
Tustin No (only deferred comp)
Villa Park No
Westminister No
Yorba Linda Yes (no medical)
Attachment 2
PART-TIME EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 0
This Agreement of Part-time Employment in the classification of
is entered into between the County Sanitation
Districts of Orange County, California (hereinafter "Districts") ,
and - , (hereinafter "employee") to be
effective on Employee recognizes and
understands that their regular work week may be less than 40
hours.
Employee's Duties. The employee will perform the duties and
responsibilities as are set forth on the Class Specification for
the job classification referenced above. Employee' s performance
of these duties shall at all times be accomplished in a manner
satisfactory to Districts' management .
Compensation. Employee is entitled to compensation for services
rendered under this agreement at the hourly rate established by
the Districts' Boards for the above referenced job
classification.
Benefits. Employee is not entitled to receive benefits of
employment provided to regular, full-time Districts employees,
including, but not limited to, health coverage, life and
disability insurance, paid leaves and retirement plan. Employee
will be covered under benefits required by law, such as Workers'
Compensation, and will contribute required contributions to the
Federal Insurance Contributions Act .
Termination of Employment. This Agreement may be terminated by
either Districts or employee at any time without cause by
providing two weeks written notice . This Agreement may be
terminated by the Districts for cause at any time in the event
the employee fails to perform their duties and responsibilities
in a manner satisfactory to Districts' Management .
In Witness Whereof, the parties hereto have executed this
Agreement on the day and year written below.
"DISTRICTS" "EMPLOYEE"
Name Date Name Date
GEE 1/95
9
RESOLUTION NO. 96-20
AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 95-105
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7,
11, 13 and 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION
RESOLUTION NO. 95-105 BY EXTENDING BENEFIT
COVERAGE TO REGULAR EMPLOYEES WORKING A
REDUCED WORKWEEK.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13
and 14 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
1. Section 1. Amend Article I, "Definitions", to provide part-time employees
with the benefits set forth in Section 19, 'Vacations", Section 20, "Sick
Leave", Section 23, "Personal Leave", Section 37, "Holidays", Section 39,
"Insurance", and Section 60, "Severance Pay, on a prorated basis as
follows:
Hours of work per week Percent Benefit Subsidy
0 - under 20 None
20 - under 30 50 percent
30 - 40 75 percent
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 28, 1996.
J:\WPDOCMIRES1 ES96 20
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
FEBRUARY 28, 1996
Agenda Item (11)(b)(4): FAHR96-10 Consideration of motion
approving renewal of Boiler& Machinery
Insurance for a one-year period effective
March 1, 1996 to March 1, 1997, with American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance
(Kemper Insurance Group), in an amount not to exceed $79,698.
Summary
This agenda item relates to the annual renewal of Boiler& Machinery insurance coverage for
the Districts for the period March 1, 1996 through March 1, 1997.
During the renewal process last year, the Districts' Broker of Record, Robert F. Driver
Company, submitted the Districts' Boiler& Machinery insurance requirements to six (6)
insurance carriers. Three (3) proposals were received.
Upon the Committee's review of the proposals and recommendation, the Joint Boards of
Directors approved placement of Boiler& Machinery insurance coverage with American -
Manufacturers Mutual Insurance (Kemper Insurance Group) for the period March 1, 1995
through March 1, 1996. Kemper's overall superior policy terms, their knowledge of the Districts'
facilities and programs, and the fact that theirs was the lowest cost proposal, were cited as
factors in the recommendation to select Kemper.
Robert F. Driver Company has surveyed the current Boiler& Machinery insurance market, and
has reported (see attached letter)that only the three (3) carriers that submitted proposals last
year still offer coverage for operations as large as the Districts. Given todays restrictive
insurance market and the fact that Kemper will renew coverage for the Districts'with only a
premium adjustment ($2,307) to allow for the increase in the Districts' property values, the
Districts' Broker recommends Boiler& Machinery insurance renewal with Kemper. Staff
concurs. Sufficient funds are contained in the current budget to cover the premium costs
($79,698).
Staff Recommendation
Renew Boiler& Machinery Insurance for the Districts for the period March 1, 1996 to March 1,
1997, with American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance (Kemper Insurance Group), in an amount
not to exceed $79,698.
FAHR Committee Recommendation to Joint Boards of Directors
The FAHR Committee concurs with the recommendation of staff.
J:%WPD0C0SAG96WEB% iB4
/ (� ROBERT F. DRIVER ASSOCIATES comPLE(EINSURANCEIBONDSERvice -
_CIATES a Dirision of&Am F.Dd yr Co..Inc.
ASSO
January 25, 1996
Mr. Steve Kozak
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127
RE: Boiler and Machinery Insurance Renewal
Dear Steve:
As we discussed, the Boiler and Machinery insurance marketplace has not changed very much since last
renewal. The limited number of available underwriters still providing Boiler and Machinery coverage are
imposing high deductibles and premiums for large underwritings, such as County Sanitation Districts of
Orange County.
As you may recall from last year, Reliance National quoted premiums considerably higher than the
incumbent Kemper, while Hartford Steam Boiler provided a quotation that was slightly higher than
Kempees. We have surveyed the market, and have found that, today, these three canters are the only
ones able to insure and service complex co-generation facilities such as those owned by the Districts.
Based on the similar marketplace and unchanged underwriting positions of the other markets, we
recommend that County Sanitation Districts of Orange County remain with Kemper Insurance Group for
the renewal effective March 1, 1996. The current premium is $77,377, including state mandated CIGA
fees. The renewal premium, including CIGA fees, is $79,698 allowing for a premium increase based on
trended values.
Sincerely,
ROGER I�VE''R�SSOCI�S
DiYnaJ. IGehl /J ((////11,'�e�n�
Assistant Vice ent
DJKlmsy
dAdA BIRCH.STREET..SUITF-230,AIMPORT BCACH.CALIFORNIA 92AM1.26I0
014, 7.SA.0271 • FA.w 171J175AQ711
x�wuwaxvcsoonew.mnoc
v
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
FEBRUARY 28, 1996
Agenda Item (11 )(b)(5): FAHR96-14 Consideration of motion to
receive and file Treasurer's Report for the
month of December 1995.
Summary
Both Pacific Investment Management Co., PIMCO, and Mellon Trust began their professional
external management of our funds in September 1995.
In order to give the Directors an opportunity to review the month-end reports available from
PIMCO, and to avoid distribution at the meeting, reports from the prior month are included with
the agenda. Quarterly presentations are made to the Committee by both PIMCO and our third-
party independent consultant, Callan Associates.
The Investment Policy adopted by the Joint Boards on May 24, 1995, includes reporting
requirements as listed down the PIMCO Monthly Report for the "Liquid Operating Monies" and
for the "Long-Tenn Operating Monies." All of the Investment Policy requirements are being
complied with and performance to date exceeds the index rates.
Balances
CSDOC Dec.31, 1995
State of Calf.WF $16,843,353
Bank of America 351,082
PIMCO-Short-term Portfolio 60,559,387
PIMCO-Long-term Portfolio 256,129.758
District 11 GO Bond Fund 16,715
Debt Service Reserves @ Trustees 33.904.754
$367.805.049
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends the Committee receive, approve and forward this report to the Joint Boards.
FAHR Committee Recommendation to Joint Boards of Directors
The Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee recommends this report be
approved and fled.
J9WPDOGBSWG96TEBWl 1 B-5
February 26, 1996
CSDOC
TOTAL CASH & INVESTMENTS 1994 - 1995
s
szm
sro
sa
o..s osr ear raze u..z+ nrm u.r e� +..w �hn wa-ei eepe eo oa.w ua.eo o-.ei
MONTHLY REPORT
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
P[MCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING
(for the month ending December 31, 1995)
Liquid Operating Monies
14.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value: $61,121,663
Historical Cost: $61.131,613
14.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: :14
Of Index: .25
14.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact (gain/loss) of 1% Change: $85,570 (.14%)
U.L4 REVERSE REPOS % of Portfolio in Reverse Repos:
(see attached schedule) 0%
14.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY % of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 88%
14.L6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: AA
.14.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING % of Portfolio Below 'A': 0%
14.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE 'In Compliance"
14.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Portfolio Total Rate of Return:
I Month: .50
3 Months: 1.50
12 Months: -----
Year-lo-Date: ------
Index Total Rate of Return:
t Month: .46
r:IsuAorlrgxw,vlumoWom60r.I lY5
MON'TOLY REPORT
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING
(for the month eroding December 31, 1995)
Long Tenn Operating dtorlies
14.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Curtnnt Market Value: $264,147.577
_ Historical Cost: $260,440,714
14.1.2 MODnrIrD DURATION Of Portfolio 2.7
Of Index: 2.4
14.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact (gainlloss) of I% Change $7,131,985 (2.6%)
14.1.4 REVERSE REPOS % of Portfolio in Reverse Repos:
(see attached scllcdule) 0%
14.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY % of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: NA
14.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: AA
14.1.7 . SECL71179ES BELOW "A" RATING % of Portfolio Below "A": 0%
14.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance"
14.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Portfolio Total Rate of Return:
1 Month: 1.13
3 Mundts: 3.39
12 Months: ------
Year-to-Date: ---
Index Total Rate of Return:
1 Month: .90
r, dwbp',rwerWrmoLan,? J.I1J5
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
FEBRUARY 28, 1996
Agenda Item
1 1 )(b)(6): FAHR 96-15, Consideration of motion to receive and file the Mid-Year
Finanical &Operational Report for the period ending December 31, 1995.
Attached
Mdin a separately bound document is the Districts'first comprehensive Mid-Year Report for the
period ending December 31, 1995. This report is a consolidation of the of both the financial and
operational accomplishments of the Districts'at the mid-point of the 1995-96 fiscal year.
Contained within the Mid-Year Financial Report are budget summary reviews of the Joint Operating&
Working Capital Funds, the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund, individual Districts,and the self-insurance
funds. Contained within the Mid-Year Operational Report is the status of the Activity Trends and Projects
previously identified in the 1995-96 Approved Budget.
As indicated within the Overview Section of this report, 44.25 percent or$24,060,000 of the 1995-96 net
joint operating budget of$54,380,000 has been expended. In addition, the Districts'are still only at 48.26
percent of the"target'budget of$49,860,000.
The cost per million gallons for the second quarter alone was$603.09,which is slightly higher than the
annual targeted amount of$599.00, but below the approved budget of$627.30. However, the cost per
million gallons for the first half of the year is still low at $565.87 due to the unusually low first quarter total
of only$508.98,
Some of the factors contributing to the Increase of$94.11 cost per mg from the second quarter's total of
$603.09 over the first quarter's total of$509.98 include:
• Environmental Monitoring increased 257.27 percent,or$34.74 cast per mg over the first
quarter. This majority of this increase is primarily attributable to the timing of payments
made for ocean monitoring since out of the$1.3 million costs Incurred to date, only
$268,000 was recognized in the first quarter. Although total environmental monitoring costs
are$78,000 less than last year at this time,this line item is currently at 55.51 percent of the
total budget and will have to be carefully monitored over the remainder of the year.
• Although Repair Materials increased 67,91 percent, or$20.22 cost per mg over the first
quarter, this line item is still at 49.63 percent of budget at mid-year. Staff will be challenged
to keep this line item within the total$3,375,900 budget since an additional$500,000 of
material relating to plant automation computer maintenance has now been identified that
had not previously been considered during the preparation of the budget.
• Research increased 580.65 percent,or$13.59 cost per mg over the first quarter. The
majority of this increase is related to the increase in payments made to Southern California
Coastal Water Research Project Authority(SCCWRPA). Although, the Research line item
is currently at 69.28 percent of total budget, staff believes that the costs booked-to-date
reflect a greater portion of the total annual cost and that the year end total cost will
approximate the budget of$565,000.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the review,approve and file the 1995-96 Mid-Year Report.
C IMDATAVTHDWIDYR AG
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
FEBRUARY 28, 1996
Agenda Item
(11)(b)(7): FAHR 96-17: Consideration of motion to approve the 1996-97 Budget
Assumptions for use in preparation of Districts' 1996-97 Budget
Summary
Certain assumptions are necessary as a foundation for developing the Districts' budget.
These assumptions guide the Board of Directors and Districts' staff in determining the
level of wastewater treatment services that will be provided to the community and how
these services will be funded.
Attached are key assumptions staff has developed in order to guide the Districts'
through the development of the 1996-97 budget. Staff encourages Directors' to -
propose additional assumptions that they believe should be used in the budget
development process or to propose any other changes they would like to see
incorporated in the 1996-97 budget.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Joint Boards review the attached Budget Assumptions and
approve their use in the preparation of the 1996-97 budget.
CIMDATAp BMUW SUMAG
1996-97 Proposed Budget Assumptions
• Inflation for Orange County in 1996-97 is projected to be 2.5 percent based on the
percentage of change in the consumer price index obtained from the December
1995 Economic and Business Review report prepared by Chapman University.
• Connection fees, or capital facilities connection charges, and annexation fees will
increase by the Engineering News Record index for Los Angeles in accordance
with the adopted Board Resolution. However, user fees will remain at the same
rates for the fifth consecutive year.
• Property tax revenues are projected to remain constant as the increases from new
development are expected to be offset by a general decline in overall property
valuation.
• After discussions with the Districts' Investment Manager, PIMCO, earnings on the
investment of the Districts idle operating cash and reserves will be budgeted at
six percent.
• Staffing levels will remain the same or will be lower than the levels approved in the
1995-96 budget. There will be no new net positions added. In addition, salaries will
remain at prudent levels as memorandum of understanding agreements are due to
expire in November 1996. Step increases will be budgeted for all non-exempt
employees not currently at the top of their range.
• The proposed joint operating budget will continue to reflect an improvement in
safety, technical, and management training as the Districts moves towards national
standards in the percentage of training costs to total salaries. In 1996-97, the
Districts will emphasize cross-training for operational and maintenance employees
in order to achieve multi-tasking positions within the organization and reduce the
total number of employees needed to operate the treatment facilities.
• All programs and activities will be re-evaluated to determine their contribution
towards the Districts' mission with the intent to eliminate those programs and
activities that do not.
• The capital improvement program will continue forward with only the completion of
the most critical projects until the Strategic Plan update is completed. With the goal
of completing at least 80 percent of the total capital improvement program budget
within a 12 month period, staff is estimating that the total 1996-97 Capital
Improvement Program will fall within a range of$25 million to $50 million.
C'%W DATAUTBDSUDASS.MM
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
FEBRUARY 28, 1996
Agenda Item (12): Consideration of motion to authorize staff to
place a moratorium on the determination and
collection of excess capacity charges until such
time that a study for capital charges is completed
and a method to collect capital charges is adopted by the Boards of Directors,
and to guarantee the capital charge for industrial users which connect to the
system or increase their discharge prior to completion of the study will be no
higher than those specified in the staff report dated February 22, 1996. The
moratorium will not apply to dischargers which enter into separate discharge
agreements with the Districts.
Summary
The excess capacity charge(ECC)initially adopted in July 1983,was intended to be applied on new
developments that connect to the sewer, or existing developments that expand operations and require
substantial sewerage facilities capacity. The ECC would be determined by the Boards of Directors on a
case-by-case basis.
On May 24, 1995,the Boards of Directors adopted an ordinance,effective July 1, 1995,establishing a
method to calculate the ECC,including a requirement that existing businesses pay an additional capital
charge when their discharge increased by 25%. After the ECC calculation method was adopted by the
Boards of Directors it was met with considerable opposition from businesses because of the cost
associated with its implementation. Because of a lack of adequate community outreach,the staff
recommended and the Boards of Directors concurred that the method of determining the ECC be repealed
pending reanalysis and community Input. This was accomplished on November 15, 1995,and the Districts
returned to the former practice of assessing charges on a case-by-case basis.
There are new businesses considering starting up in Orange County and existing businesses presently
planning to substantially expand their process operations and increase their discharge volumes. Staff
believes that establishing a standard method for determining an ECC will provide useful guidance to those
dischargers who are subject to the charge.
A project to study capital charges and make a recommendation for connection fees and ECCs will begin
approximately March 1996,and it is anticipated to be completed by early 1997. In order to accommodate
industries'budgeting and planning needs,it is necessary to establish criteria which can be used by industry
in determining what their future capital charge may be. The staff report explains the criteria for various
groups of industrial users.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends the Boards of Directors approve the request to allow staff to place a temporary
moratorium for ECCs for industrial users now making applications for new wastewater discharge permits
until the capital charge study is completed and a method to tolled capital charges is adopted. All
dischargers applying for permits during the moratorium would be informed that capital charges vdH be
assessed in the future with a guarantee to industry the capital charge to certain industrial users will conform
to those specified in the staff report dated February 22, 1996.
J:WNSB URIaDMS MAT.BRD
Febwry Y3,1808 a 10:]Oa.m. tar:
' a
February 22, 1996
STAFF REPORT
Agenda Item (12) - Consideration of motion to authorize staff to place a
moratorium on the determination and collection of excess capacity charges until
such time that a study for capital charges is completed and a method to collect
capital charges is adopted by the Boards of Directors and to guarantee the
capital charge for industrial users which connect to the system or increase their
discharge prior to completion of the study will be no higher than those specified
in the staff report dated February 22, 1996. The moratorium will not apply to
discharges which enter into separate discharge agreements with the Districts.
BACKGROUND
The excess capacity charge (ECC) was initially adopted and became effective on
July 1, 1983. The charge is applied to new developments connecting to the sewer, or
existing developments that expand operations and require substantial sewerage
facilities capacity. It was intended to provide the Districts the ability to collect revenue
for construction of capital projects to accommodate the increased flow. The amount of
the charge would be in an amount to be determined by the Boards of Directors on a
case-by-case basis.
The ECC wording is contained in Section 309 of the Wastewater Discharge
Regulations dated February 7, 1992, and was unchanged until May 24, 1995, when the
Boards of Directors adopted an ordinance, effective July 1, 1995, establishing a
specific method to calculate the ECC which was applicable to any new connection or
new user whose discharge was tributary to the Districts' sewerage system and whose
average daily loading exceeded certain parameters. The purpose of the ECC was to
implement a standard method for determining the ECC, including a requirement that
existing businesses pay an additional capital charge when their discharge increased by
25% or more.
The ECC method adopted in May 1995 met with considerable opposition from the
business community because of the cost associated with implementation. The staff
recommended and the Boards of Directors concurred that the new method of
determining the ECC be repealed. This was accomplished on November 15, 1995 and
the Districts returned to the former practice of assessing charges for high-volume
dischargers on a case-by-case basis by reenacting former ordinance Section 309.
The most recent issue to be raised deals with existing businesses which substantially
expand their process operations and therefore increase their discharge volumes. Staff
raesurv22,1wB.1¢wa.m. ew
CSDOC 0 A Bow W7 . AD+nlain Wfle,CA 92728.8127 0 (714)962O411
AGENDA ITEM (13)
Page 2 Z
February 22, 1996 -
believes that establishing a standard method for determining an ECC will provide
useful guidance to those dischargers who are subject to this charge.
ISSUES RAISED SINCE REPEAL OF METHOD TO DETERMINE ECC
There are at least two companies that are presently considering expansion plans that
would increase their discharges by more than 100,000 gallons per day. Each of these
expansion plans will require substantial sewerage facilities capacity and, therefore, is
subject to Section 309.
A project to study capital charges and make a recommendation for connection fees and
ECC will begin approximately March 1996, and it is anticipated to be completed by
early 1997. In order to treat all businesses fairly, staff believes that it is advisable to
wait until the study is complete before collecting additional ECCs.
GUARANTEE TO INDUSTRY REGARDING FUTURE CAPITAL CHARGES
Many industries in Orange County, or those desiring to locate in Orange County have
inquired about the Districts' future collection of capital charges. This is important
information for companies because they use the data to make budgeting projections
and decisions affecting plant operations. Due to the importance that capital charges
have on industry, the Districts wish to institute the following guarantees to industry:
1. When the new capital charge program becomes effective, a new capital charge
shall be applied to industrial users initiating discharge to the Districts between
July 1, 1995 and prior to adoption of the new capital charge program (estimated
1997), which discharge: 1) average daily flow equal to or greater than 50,000
gallons, or 2) average daily Suspended Solids (SS) equal to or greater than 105
Ibs, or 3) average daily Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) equal to or greater
than 105 lbs.
However, the annual ECC payment under the new capital charge method shall
not be greater than the annual payment would have been using the ECC method
(including interest) repealed November 15, 1995, for the same quantity of flow,
BOD, and SS for which the ECC charge would have been calculated and paid
over ten years.
2. When the new capital charge program becomes effective, a new capital charge
shall be applied to industrial users permitted by the Districts prior to July 1,
1995, which discharged for fiscal year 1994-95: 1) average daily flow equal to or
greater than 50,000 gallons, or 2) average daily SS equal to or greater than 105
Ibs, or 3) average daily BOD equal to or greater than 105 Ibs, and who increased
raa qV..1M a 10:30a.m. i.«
AGENDA ITEM (13)
y Page 3
February 22, 1996
their average daily flow, BOD, or SS after July 1, 1995. The new capital charge
shall be for the difference in flow and loadings compared to fiscal year 1994-95.
However, the annual ECC payment under the new capital charge method shall
not be greater than the annual payment would have been using the ECC method
(including interest) repealed November 15, 1995, for the same quantity of flow,
BOD, and SS for which the ECC charge would have been calculated and paid
over ten years.
3. If the industrial users subject to items 1 and 2 above choose to switch from the
method of calculation shown above to the new capital charge method within the
first year of adoption, then the new charge method will thereafter be used in
calculating all the capital charges for the industrial user.
4. The issue of charges to existing dischargers which have not increased their
average daily flow, BOD, or SS after July 1, 1995, or are not subject to items 1 or
2 above, will be addressed as part of the cost allocation review in the new
strategic plan.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Boards of Directors approve the request to allow staff to place a
temporary lectiou moratorium for ECCs for industrial users industries now making
applications for new wastewater discharge permits until the capital charge study is
completed and a method to collect capital charges is adopted. All dischargers applying
for permits would be informed that capital charges wW be assessed in the future with a
guarantee to industry as described in this staff report.
J W:Ivw
JAWPVW%AURVOWSWORAT.BRD
i.u.nu+we.ro�a.m. N„
v
b
�(13
S OF DIRECTORS
R MEETING
RY 28, 199E
Age "9: Consideration of motion to receive
and file Staff Report dated February 6, 1996 re the
Joint Agreement of the County of Orange, the
Official Investment Pool Participants' Committee
and Each Option A Pool Participant; and
consideration of Resolution No. 96-21 approving
said Agreement.
Summary
On the afternoon of January 3, 1996, the Orange County Investment Pool (OCIP) Committee
reached final agreement with the County on all of the details of the"Joint Agreement of the
County of Orange, the Official Investment Pool Participants' Committee and Each Option A Pool
Participant"for the resolution of claims against the County of Orange dated December 18, 1995.
The Joint Agreement has been conveyed to all Option A participants (the 190 schools, cities,
special districts and other public entities that signed the Option A version of the Comprehensive
Settlement Agreement that was approved in May 1995)for their individual consideration and
approval. The attached staff report outlines the major features of the Joint Agreement. Copies
of the conveyance letter from Pillsbury Madison 8 Sutro and the executive summary of the Joint
Agreement are attached. On January 10, the Joint Agreement was held over for consideration
by the FAHR Committee to February 14 to allow time to receive the County disclosure
statement filed January 19 in federal Bankruptcy Court. To obtain a copy of the entire Joint
Agreement, call Cortina Chaudhry at (714) 962-2411, extension 2003.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee receive
and file the staff report, and recommend approval of the Joint Agreement to the Executive
Committee.
FAHR Committee Recommendation
The FAHR Committee recommends that the Executive Committee receive and file the staff
report, and recommends approval of the Joint Agreement to the Joint Boards.
Executive Committee Recommendation
The Executive Committee concurs with the FAHR recommendation.
��wwocietivaeevmee�u
e
n
February 5, 1996
STAFF REPORT
FAHR96-09: Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Report dated
February 5, 1996 re the Joint Agreement of the County of Orange,
the Official Investment Pool Participants' Committee and Each
Option A Pool Participant; and consideration of resolution
approving said Agreement.
The OCIP Committee has approved the "Joint Agreement of the County of Orange, the
Official Investment Pool Participants' Committee and Each Option A Pool Participant."
This has been a very lengthy process. Meetings were held throughout the summer to
develop a platform which would be the basis for paying off all of the County's vendors,
bond holders and non-governmental creditors. These meetings resulted in the OCIP
Committee first approving the Joint Agreement on September 7. The September
version of the Joint Agreement formed the basis of the legislation which was approved
by the legislature and signed into law by Governor Wilson in late-September. The Joint
Agreement moves revenues of certain County agencies and the OCTA into accounts
that will be used for paying off new borrowings which will be used to pay off the various
creditors mentioned above, and improves the order in which Option A participants
receive litigation proceeds from the lawsuits against Merrill Lynch and others. It also
removes all future recourse against the County by the Option A participants who sign
the Joint Agreement.
The September legislation did not check with all of the details of the Joint Agreement.
Naturally, the OCIP Committee insisted that the Joint Agreement be amended to
coincide with the state laws that had been passed to support it and was also concerned
that the errata of the September Joint Agreement be corrected.
Unfortunately, bankruptcy counsel for the County did not agree with the concerns of the
OCIP Committee and he delayed any substantive and constructive action necessary to
amend the Joint Agreement and resolve the impasse. When Judge Ryan originally
directed the County to amend its complaint against Merrill Lynch because the County
had not adequately demonstrated that it even had proper standing to sue Merrill Lynch
regarding the commingled investment pool, the Joint Agreement became valueless
because the ability of the Option A participants to receive any litigation proceeds from
the County's efforts was suddenly thrown into serious question. The OCIP Committee
had no reason to continue to press for amending a Joint Agreement whose very basis
was in such peril.
Fortunately, on December 1, 1995 Judge Ryan ruled that the County's amended
pleading was sufficient and that the County could proceed with the suit against Merrill
Lynch. Interest in amending the Joint Agreement was renewed by both the County and
CSDOC 0 P.O.Box 0127 6 Fountain Valle,CA 92726-6127 • (7td)962-2411
Staff Report _
Page 2
February 5, 1996
the OCIP Committee and, as a result of intense efforts by the attorneys and financial
professionals working for the OCIP Committee and the County, the December 18
amended Joint Agreement was approved in principle with the assumption that the
pending side letters between the County and the Cities Subcommittee and between the
County and the TCA would be subsequently approved by all relevant parties. The side
letters have been approved, and after a flurry of letters between the attorneys, the Joint
Agreement was approved for distribution on January 3 and has been conveyed to the
Option A participants for their consideration and approval. Price Waterhouse is
handling the distribution and will be receiving the approval/disapproval results from each
of the approximately 190 councils and boards that must decide on the Joint Agreement.
Im�act on the Sanitation Districts
The Joint Agreement is favorable to the interests of the Sanitation Districts. Under the
Comprehensive Settlement Agreement of May 1995, the Option A participants (which
includes the Sanitation Districts) were entitled to share in the first layer of the litigation
proceeds 2:1 with the County. Under the Joint Agreement, the County is now in the
third layer of litigation receipts. Schools will receive the first $55 million in litigation
proceeds, the non-school Option A participants will receive the second layer of
proceeds up to $325 million, and the County will receive the third layer of proceeds up
to $176 million. Layers four through seven are a combination of splits between the
Option A participants, the OCTA, and the County. OCTA's share will be a payback for
the $15 million per year it loses under the Joint Agreement.
In exchange for this improvement in the Option A's position in the litigation "receiving
line", the OCIP participants give up any further recourse against the County other than
the litigation proceeds. However, assuming that the secured and unsecured claims that
were fully allowed by the County under the terms of the CSA are, in fact, of limited value
because of the County's dire financial position, giving them up in favor of an improved
litigation position is prudent. It can be argued that only the litigation proceeds will
provide any further payback to the Sanitation Districts and the other Option A
participants. Today we have received approximately 80% of our original deposits that
were held by the County. Assuming that the litigation (or settlement) with Merrill Lynch
and the others goes reasonably well, we may approach 90% of our original deposits.
There is more good news. The Joint Agreement and its supporting letter from the
County's bankruptcy counsel provides that the withheld proceeds now being held by the
County will be released. The amount due to the Sanitation Districts will be listed in the
final Price Waterhouse documents which Sanitation Districts' staff does not have at the
time of this writing. We will report on this amount at the meeting.
Staff Report
Page 3
February 5, 1996
Most importantly, the Joint Agreement will provide the necessary funds for the County to
repay all of its non-government creditors. This is done by a net $15 million per year
reallocation of OCTA revenues to the County, and a total of$12 million per year($4
million each) from Harbors, Beaches and Parks, Flood Control, and the Orange County
Development Agency. For the Sanitation Districts, this is a very favorable part of the
agreement. The repayment of all outstanding bonds by the County will remove the
cloud of default once and for all from the name "Orange County."
The Joint Agreement also provides that the County will use Thomas Hayes to oversee
the disbursement of revenues under the Joint Agreement. It also provides that the
County will not seek or support any diversion of revenue from any signing Option A Pool
Participant for the purpose of financing the repayment of claims in the County's Plan of
Adjustment. This particular provision is important because, as you may recall, the
County had advocated that the property tax revenues of the Sanitation Districts be
reallocated to the County for just that purpose.
The last document for completing the workout of the bankruptcy is the County's Plan of
Adjustment which was filed in December. The associated Disclosure Statement was
fled January 19, 1996. It is, in essence, the "business plan" of the Plan of Adjustment
and provides the specific details on how the County will meet its obligations under the
Plan of Adjustment. The Disclosure Statement is approximately 350 pages long. It
classifies all claims against the County and discloses how each will be treated. It also
describes and assigns the assets and revenues the County intends to use to pay the
claims.
The Plan of Adjustment, Disclosure Statement and Joint Agreement are consistent with
one another with respect to the treatment of the Sanitation Districts. All three propose
that our position for receiving proceeds from the litigation against Merrill Lynch and
others is improved in exchange for our agreeing to take no further recourse against the
County for the secured and non-secured claims fully-allowed under the Comprehensive
Settlement Agreement (CSA). The Joint Boards approved it April of last year and it was
approved by federal Bankruptcy Court Judge Ryan in May. These claims amount to
20% or approximately $93 million of our original investments in the OCIP.
Litigation against Merrill Lynch and others is, of course, the issue of most interest to all
of us. The proceeds from this litigation is the largest and (arguably) the most likely
source of additional funds for repaying the losses suffered by the cities, schools and
special districts that had invested in the OCIP. Pat Shea provided a January 22 update
on the bankruptcy (attached).
ti
Staff Report
Page 4
February 5, 1996
On February 16, Judge Ryan will re-hear the County's motion to simplify the case
against Merrill Lynch by bifurcating the causes of action into two portions. He will also
hear the County's motion to strike Merrill Lynch's estoppel defense which asserts that
since the County knew full well that its investment practices were illegal, then the
County can't turn to Merrill Lynch. The County, on the other hand, under the theory of
ultra vires, claims that because Merrill Lynch knew or should have known that it was
supporting illegal investment practices as the vendor, it must return all of the original
investments back to the citizens of Orange County. The citizens are the ones who are
ultimately protected from the illegal activities of the vendor, irrespective of the actions of
the County Treasurer.
February 16 may well be a defining moment for the ease and timeliness of resolving the
County's case against Merrill Lynch. If Judge Ryan agrees to the County's motion to
strike Merrill Lynch's estoppel defense and if he agrees to the County's motion to
simplify the case by bifurcating so that only ultra vires is tried first, then the case moves
quickly without extensive discovery. Merrill Lynch may be more likely to settle and to
settle early. In any event, the case against Merrill Lynch will move forward and will
remain the only discernable source of significant source of funds for paying back our
lost investments.
Staff will provide additional details at the meeting of the FAHR and Executive
Committees.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the FAHR and Executive Committees receive and file the staff
report dated February 5, 1996, and recommend approval of the agreement to the Joint
Boards of Directors.
BPA:cmc
J\WPNC\CM NMRS AHRB S C
. Lww OIIiC E3 Of
PILLSBURY MADISON 6 SUTRO LLP
L09 ANGELES SUITE IBOO wEN LO VAR.
NEw YOPR ORANGE TY COUN
SAC PAMENTO 101 WEST BROADWAY A. O.GO
WA.
R.TOKro SAN DIEGO. CALIFORNIA 92101-8201 „AN �osE
sN INroN. oc orvc EONG
TO[TO TELEPNONE I9191 8JA-S O00
GACJIMILE (3191 YJfi-1995
WRITERS Of F10E AND
DIRECT DIAL NVN9En
(619) 544-3177
December 27, 1995
TO: ORANGE COUNTY INVESTMENT POOL
PARTICIPANTS ' DISTRIBUTION LIST
Re: In re County of Orange, Case No. SA94-22272-JR
"JOINT AGREEMENT" PROPOSED BY THE COUNTY OF ORANGE FOR
THE RESOLUTION OF POOL-RELATED CLAIMS OF OPTION A POOL
PARTICIPANTS, AND OTHER RELATED MATTERS
Dear Pool Participant:
Enclosed herewith you will find an execution copy of an
agreement entitled JOINT AGREEMENT OF THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, THE
OFFICIAL INVESTMENT POOL PARTICIPANTS' COMMITTEE AND EACH OPTION
A POOL PARTICIPANT FOR RESOLUTION OF CLAIMS AGAINST THE COUNTY
OF ORANGE ( "Joint Agreement") along with an Executive Summary
relating to that agreement.
This proposed Joint Agreement by the County is intended to
address the treatment of the remaining claims of Option A Pool
Participants allowed under the Comprehensive Settlement
Agreement ( "CSA" ) , and to address certain other specific matters
related to the interests of Pool Participants.
While the Joint Agreement is not a Plan of Adjustment, if
executed by your government entity, it will have material impact
on your right to participate in the Plan of Adjustment process,
and will, to a large extent, define your entitlements under the
Plan of Adjustment. This is obviously a very important
document. It is technically drafted and requires your
attention, along with the specific advice of your own financial
and legal professionals.
As with the Comprehensive Settlement Agreement, the
financial and legal professionals of the OCIP Committee are
unable to act as advisors to you on an individual basis .
Rather, the financial and legal advisors to the OCIP
Committee have prepared the Executive Summary which accompanies
20946332
December 27, 1995
Page 2
this letter to assist you in understanding the Joint Agreement.
The impact of the Joint Agreement will be different for
virtually every individual government agency and, as a result,
the analysis required must be done by each agency on an
individual basis.
To put the Joint Agreement in context, it is important to
briefly review the history of this case as it pertains to Pool
Participants.
On December 6, 1994, the County of Orange filed two
separate bankruptcy cases: one for the County (In Re Count of
Orange, Bankruptcy Case No. SA94-22272-JR) and one or an entity
o t e County entitled The Orange County Investment Pools (In Re
Orange County Investment Pools, Bankruptcy Case No. SA94-22�
JR) . T2- fi ing or these two separate bankruptcy cases was
intended by the County to identify the separate assets and
interests of the Pools as opposed to the rights of general
creditors of the County of Orange. There may have also been a
political interest in attempting to distance the County of
Orange from the operations of the Treasurer's Office in
connection with the investment decisions leading up to the
$1 .64 billion loss sustained by the Pool .
Shortly after the filing of the bankruptcy cases, the
County announced its intent to challenge the entitlement of Pool
Participants to recover their deposits in the Pool under the
provisions of California law intended to protect Pool
Participant deposits from invasion by a County under
circumstances mirroring those in this case. (California
Government Code S 27100.1, and others. ) Long term denial of
access by Pool Participants to their deposits in the Orange
County Investment Pools threatened the economic viability of a
substantial number of Pool Participants.
After the filing of the two bankruptcy cases, the United
States Trustee for the Central District of California, Marcy
Tiffany, formed a special committee to represent Pool depositors
in the Pool case. This committee consists of seven members:
Chairman, Stan Oftelie of the Orange County Transportation
Authority ( ^OCTA^) ; Andrew Czorny of the Orange County Water
District; Blake Anderson of the Orange County Sanitation
District; Paul Brady, City Manager of the City of Irvine
(representing a special subcommittee of Orange County cities) ;
John Nelson, Assistant Superintendent of the Orange County
Department of Education (representing a special subcommittee of
Orange County schools) ; Walter Kreutzen of the Transportation
Corridor Agencies; and Michael Martello, City Attorney of the
City of Mountain View (representing a special subcommittee of
26666773
December 27, 1995
Page 3
non-Orange County agencies) . This committee became known as the
OCIP Committee.
The OCIP Committee began meeting almost daily in early
January and crafted, along with the County, an interim funding
mechanism to meet the emergency needs of Pool Participants. The
intent of that facility was to provide the minimal funding
required to keep the constituent agencies of the OCIP
financially alive during the time necessary to resolve the
dispute between the OCIP Committee and the County regarding Pool
Participants ' entitlement to their deposits in the investment
Pools. That interim facility operated successfully through May
of 1995 and disbursed over $900,000,000. During that same
period of time, the Pool Committee conducted extensive financial
analysis and legal research on the issue of whether Pool
Participants could recover all their deposits from the Orange
County Investment Pools, leaving the County to bear the entire
$1.64 billion loss against their December 6, 1994 deposit
balance of approximately $2 .3 billion.
There was support for that position, including the specific
intent of Government Code g 27100. 1, the reliance of Pool
Participants upon the County for investment policies and capital
protection, and the revelation of numerous financial
irregularities relating to Pool Participants ' interests in the
Pools pre-bankruptcy (the skimming of interest, misallocation of
assets, and other similar activities) . In other words, there
were good legal and equitable arguments for requiring the County
to sustain the loss in the Investment Pools from its own deposit
balance.
However, there was another side to the argument.
Notwithstanding the culpability of the County for the
intentional and unintentional losses in the Pools, certain
principles that apply generally in bankruptcy cases, though
never specifically applied to a case of this type, provided the
possibility for a different result.
These arguments, in brief, start with the general disfavor
trust interests are accorded in bankruptcy cases, because such
interests run contrary to.general bankruptcy concepts of
equitable distribution to similar claimants. Additionally, the
legal foundation for the trust position asserted by Pool
Participants in this case was uniquely a matter of California
law. There was thus the potential for statutory interpretation,
and Tenth Amendment Constitutional issues, to be in controversy.
Specifically, it was unclear whether California was entitled to
structure a unique distribution priority for municipal entities
in bankruptcy inconsistent with general bankruptcy principles.
20846332
December 27, 1995
Page 4
In other words the issue presented a case of first
impression with billions of dollars, and the economic lives of
the Pool Participants, at stake, and good arguments on both
sides. ' Moreover, a number of Pool Participants had municipal
financings coming due in June of 1995 for which a substantial
portion of their Pool deposits were required. Litigation of the
trust issue, even if successful at the trial court level, would
if appealed probably not produce an actual disbursement of funds
by the County within the timeframe necessary to meet the June 30
1 As most of you know, the issue of the trust status of the
Orange County Investment Pools was recently litigated in the
context of a Motion to Dismiss brought by Merrill, Lynch,
Pierce, Fenner & Smith in the case filed against it by the
County. Among other arguments, Merrill Lynch contended that,
under California Government Code S 27100 . 1, the assets in the
Orange County Investment Pools belonged to Pool Participants,
not the County. Further, any losses sustained by the Pool would
be losses of the Pool Participants, not the County.
On December 1, 1995, Bankruptcy Judge John Ryan addressed
for the first time the critical trust issue in the context of
the Merrill Lynch motion. Judge Ryan denied the motion. In his
opinion, Judge Ryan specifically found that here where the trust
managed by the County is assumed to be insolvent, and where
deposits can not be definitively traced, the trust fails and the
Pool assets become assets of the County of Orange. Judge Ryan
concluded that the protection to Pool Participants under
Government Code S 27100. 1 failed because it was inconsistent
with the federal bankruptcy principle of equitable, uniform
distribution of assets in insolvent estates .
While it is unclear whether this decision would have been
the same had it been litigated earlier, and it is equally
unclear whether it will withstand appeal, at least on the face
of it a good argument can be made that had the OCIP Committee
elected to litigate the trust theory back in May of this year,
the court would have made the same findings, in which case the
County would have had access to the entire $5.3 billion proceeds
from the sale of the Pool securities. The County would then
have been entitled to distribute those proceeds to its unsecured
creditors, including all municipal noteholders, vendors and all
labor claimants, along with Pool Participants. Under those
circumstances, the recovery by Pool Participants would have been
much less than the $4. 1 billion in cash recovered so far. The
County•s "fresh start" may have occurred months ago at the cost
of the financial vitality of numerous Pool Participants.
20046332
December 27, 1995
Page 5
deadline for Pool Participants having municipal obligations
maturing at that time.
The Pool Committee crafted with the County a "settlement"
of its collective claims of entitlement to all Pool Participant
deposits under the trust theory in an agreement entitled the
"Comprehensive Settlement Agreement" ( "CSA") . Under this
agreement, approximately 80% of non-school deposit balances and
90% of school deposit balances have been or should shortly be
released. The remaining account balances would be allowed in
full; however, there would be different repayment entitlements
on those balances. A portion of the remaining balance would be
entitled to general unsecured creditor treatment with a credit
enhancement from recoveries from third party litigation
( "Settlement Secured Claims") , and another portion would be in a
subordinated position ( "Repayment Claims") . This compensation
package was available to Pool Participants agreeing to assign
and collectivize their claims against third party defendants.
Most Pool Participants elected this option. Fourteen Pool
Participants, primarily non-Orange County entities, elected a
different package of compensation, retaining their third-party
litigation rights.
Approximately $4. 1 billion dollars has been distributed to
Pool Participants to date in accordance with the CSA.
The County has since been unsuccessful in obtaining
taxpayer funding to refill the $1.64 billion dollar hole left by
the losses sustained by the Pool, and the amounts of deficit
hidden until the filing of the bankruptcy case. The County was
successful in obtaining the agreement of noteholders to the idea
of "rolling" their obligations from fiscal 1994-1995 into fiscal
1995-1996, a procedure which on its face appears to contradict
several government code statutes and Constitutional provisions.
The OCIP Committee raised these issues before the Bankruptcy
Court, without success, and those issues are now on appeal.
Since August of this year, the County has attempted to
craft a Plan of Adjustment which would allow it to emerge from
bankruptcy. For a number of reasons, including its diminished
credit rating and its inability to obtain any tax revenue from
its citizens, the County' s plan for recovery inevitably turned
back to the revenues and assets of Pool Participants whose
financial condition and operations were more regularly
conducted, and whose economic health was more vital.
The initial assault by the County was across the board to
the interests of virtually all Pool Participants. Legislative
realities circumscribed the County•s efforts. Ultimately, a
20846332
December 27, 1995
Page 6
legislative package was approved which, in essence, calls for
the State to divert a net amount of $15 million per year for
15 years from the Orange County Transportation Authority and
$12 million per year for 20 years from Harbors, Beaches and
Parks, the Flood Control District, and the County Development
Agency. These diverted funds will be pledged to finance the
issuance of new municipal debt, the proceeds of which will be
used to pay off the "rolled" municipal debt and other
obligations of the County.
While the legislative package is still violative of the
interests of some Pool Participants, and will have an impact on
transportation and on future infrastructure construction in
Orange County, it was considered the least destructive of the
various alternatives that were considered by the legislature.
However, this limited invasion of Pool Participants ' assets was
crafted with certain expectations relating to the remaining
claims of Pool Participants. Namely, it was anticipated that
Pool Participants would be willing to relieve the County of
their remaining Pool-Related Claims (approximately $850 million)
and have those claims become recourse only against third party
litigation recoveries. Were this assumption not correct, the
County was prepared to argue that further invasions of Pool
Participants ' assets and/or tax revenues would be required to
enable the County to pay all of its obligations under the Plan
of Adjustment. The next level of asset and/or tax diversion
would have been at the expense of cities and special districts,
and the representatives of those constituencies on the OCIP
Committee were insistent on avoiding that possibility.
The concept of making the remaining Pool Participant Pool-
Related Claims non-recourse to the County, but recourse against
third party litigation recoveries, is incorporated into the
Joint Agreement. In addition to the concepts described above,
other related issues, and nonrelated issues of importance to
specific Pool Participant constituencies, are also addressed in
the Joint Agreement.
Of particular concern to Orange County cities is the
treatment of, and access to, Pool Participant interests in
certain County Administered Accounts ( "CAAs" ) . These are
accounts kept on the books and records of the County which hold
funds on behalf of Pool Participants, and sometimes the County,
for specific purposes. Under the CSA, the CAAs were deemed to
have suffered percentage losses in the Pools similar to the
losses deemed to have occurred to the deposit balances of
specific Pool Participant agencies. The remaining balances in
these County-administered accounts are, in many cases, owned in
part by Pool Participants. However, Pool Participants have not
20S46222
December 27, 1995
Page 7
had access to these funds since the filing of the bankruptcy
case on December 6, 1994, and absent agreement with the County,
the County has no inclination to release these funds to Pool
Participants until the case is concluded, probably not earlier
than June of next year. In addition, certain CAAs have funds
which reflect unique interests of parties, like the Eminent
Domain account, and the treatment of these accounts in a manner
inconsistent with the treatment of other CAAs was also a matter
of great interest to the Committee. The Joint Agreement
requires the County to immediately distribute the cash balances
in numerous CAA's to Pool Participants, to the extent of their
undisputed claims against those accounts. It further provides a
mechanism for recovering the deficiencies in those accounts.
The Joint Agreement also announces, as part of the
financial limitations of the County of Orange, the
discontinuation of the Arterial Highway Funding Program ( "AHFP")
by the County of Orange. This program, previously in existence
for over 40 years, provided disbursement of approximately
$3.5 million a year by the County of Orange to various Orange
County cities for the maintenance and improvement of certain
roads and highways. The program was administered by the Orange
County Transportation Authority. It is the intent of the County
to confirm with Pool Participants that the AHFP will be
discontinued. Pool Participants acknowledge in the Joint
Agreement the County' s discontinuation of the program and agree
that the OCTA will not be obligated in the future to fund the
AHFP.
It was important to the OCIP Committee that third-party
litigation be conducted in an environment insulated from
political influences in County politics. The Committee has
agreed to accept Thomas W. Hayes as the representative entitled
to make all critical decisions relating to the litigation. The
Joint Agreement describes the scope of Mr. Hayes ' authority and
relationship to the County and the Committee.
The Option B Pool Participants expressed concerns that the
Joint Agreement not be inadvertently construed in a manner
adverse to the claims they hold under the CSA. In response,
specific language has been added to confirm that there are no
third-party beneficiaries to the agreement, nor is the agreement
intended to adversely affect the interests of third parties,
including Option B Pool Participants.
The Joint Agreement establishes a priority schedule for
disbursement of third-party litigation proceeds. Of note to
Pool Participants is the fact that Orange County schools receive
a priority in excess of $50 million from the first distributions
20046332
December 27, 1995
Page 8
of litigation proceeds available for Pool Participants. This
priority was granted to schools in response to the Committee's
interests in re-establishing the financial stability of the
school system, and to respond to the interest of the State
legislature to bring the schools into compliance with funding
requirements necessary to prevent state intervention.
The Joint Agreement provides for the establishment of a
five-person monitoring committee to ensure that the Plan of
Adjustment conforms to the provisions of the Joint Agreement, so
that the parties executing the Joint Agreement without the
benefit of the information normally available in the Plan of
Adjustment and/or Disclosure Statement, will be protected from
inadvertent mistake, manipulation or surprise. The Committee is
comprised of two representatives of the County, two
representatives of the Pool Committee (one of which must be a
cities representative) , and Mr. Hayes. This committee ceases
its function upon the confirmation of the County' s Plan of
Adjustment.
There are a number of other important provisions in the
Joint Agreement which apply to the interests of various Pool
Participants, and a careful reading of the Agreement is
required.
On Monday, December 18, the OCIP Committee considered the
final draft of the Joint Agreement and approved the agreement
with its support for distribution to Pool Participants as soon
as possible. It is hoped that each Pool Participant entity will
give this matter its earliest and fullest consideration and will
act on it as promptly as possible.
As with the CSA, the financial and legal representatives of
the Committee are available to you to answer your questions in
connection with your deliberations.
This Joint Agreement constitutes the next major step in the
case on behalf of Pool Participants. It has been closely
considered by the Committee and its professionals. While it is
not a completely attractive approach in that it does not assure
payment of the remaining claims of Pool Participants, it does
have some benefits which you might want to consider as part of
your deliberations, including the following:
1. The County undertakes not to seek any further
diversion of Pool Participants ' assets or tax revenues in
connection with this case. This is of particular interest to
Orange County cities and special districts;
2"46])3
December 27, 1995 =
Page 9
2. With respect to entities having interests in CAAs,
those parties signing the Joint Agreement will have immediate
access to their account balances, while those not signing the
Joint Agreement may not have immediate access to those balances;
3. With respect to schools, there is a distribution
priority from litigation proceeds in excess of $50 million;
4. With respect to all Pool Participants, those signing
the Joint Agreement will avoid the possible appointment of a
State Trustee,2 and will receive the priority of distribution
of litigation proceeds set forth in the Agreement.
These considerations are benefits to which Pool
Participants would not be automatically entitled under a Plan of
Adjustment, or otherwise.
Ultimately, each entity needs to be prepared to weigh the
prospect of losing recourse status for its allowed claims
against the County in return for a different percentage of
litigation proceeds. This is a difficult analysis because it is
impossible at this point to know what the actual value of Pool
Participants' remaining claims are against the County, because
we do not know the County's capacity to make payment on those
claims.
Likewise, it is impossible at this stage of the litigation
to be able to value the Merrill Lynch, or recently filed Peat
Marwick, litigation. Those litigations could prove to be very
valuable. On the other hand, they could be defeated in their
entirety by technical defenses which have yet to be surfaced.
What can be said is that, as of this date, the County' s
Second Amended Complaint has survived a motion to dismiss by
Merrill Lynch, and the comments of the Judge at the hearing on
the motion to dismiss were such that it does not appear that the
Complaint, or its principal component parts, are subject to
immediate dismissal on technical grounds. No responsive
pleadings have yet been filed in the Peat Marwick litigation.
There is likely to be other litigations filed by the County
against brokers and professionals relating to pre-bankruptcy
actions .
2 Under the recovery legislation enacted in October of this
year, a State Trustee could, under certain conditions, be
appointed by the Governor for the County and for any Pool
Participant to facilitate the Plan of Adjustment.
20666332
December 27, 1995
Page 10
The Orange County bankruptcy case is moving into its final
stage with the submission and confirmation of a Plan of
Adjustment. The County filed its Plan of Adjustment on
Thursday, December 21. The bankruptcy court extended the time
for the County to file its Disclosure Statement, which is the
narrative description of the Plan of Adjustment with related
projections and financial material, until January 19, 1996 . It
is the intent of the County to obtain confirmation of the Plan
of Adjustment by May of 1996.
I£ the Joint Agreement is approved by overwhelming numbers
of Option A Pool Participants, and the Plan of Adjustment is
confirmed incorporating the material elements of the Joint
Agreement, the County will likely emerge from this bankruptcy
case by the summer of 1996. Thereafter, third party litigation
will be prosecuted by the Representative on behalf of the County
and Pool Participants .
This case continues to be a monumental effort on the part
of the OCIP Committee. The members of the Committee have placed
the collective interests of the community above their own, and
have established a disciplined and successful course and
direction for Pool Participants as a united constituency. This
Joint Agreement is being presented to you as the next step in
the bankruptcy process and it has been approved unanimously by
the OCIP Committee.
If you have any questions, or would like to have a further
presentation by the financial or legal professionals of the
Committee, please telephone me as soon as possible. If your
municipal entity supports the Joint Agreement, an appropriately
executed signature page must be returned to Price Waterhouse
LLP, attention Bernar Burke, 575 Anton Boulevard, Suite 1100,
Costa Mesa, CA 92626.
Thank you for your continued courtesies and support in this
case.
Very sincerely,
Patrick-C. Shea
PCs/wpc
cc: Official Committee of Pool Participants and Counsel
20846332
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
of
JOINT AGREEMENT OF THE COUNTY OF ORANGE,
THE OFFICIAL INVESTMENT POOL PARTICIPANTS' COMMITTEE,
AND EACH OPTION A POOL PARTICIPANT
FOR RESOLUTION OF CLAIMS AGAINST THE COUNTY OF ORANGE
(THE "JOINT AGREEMENT")
THIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY IS BEING PROVIDED TO YOU FOR
YOUR CONVENIENCE ONLY, AND IS NOT INTENDED TO BE, AND
SHOULD NOT BE, RELIED UPON BY YOU IN . DETERMINING
WHETHER TO ENTER INTO THE JOINT AGREEMENT. YOU SHOULD
CAREFULLY REVIEW THE JOINT AGREEMENT IN ITS ENTIRETY
WITH YOUR COUNSEL AND OTHER PROFESSIONALS. THIS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO THE JOINT AGREEMENT. IN THE EVENT OF ANY
INCONSISTENCY BETWEEN THE JOINT AGREEMENT AND THIS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY, THE TERMS OF THE JOINT AGREEMENT
SHALL CONTROL.
THE JOINT AGREEMENT WILL AFFECT THE RIGETE OF ALL
OPTION A POOL PARTICIPANTS WHO SIGN THE JOINT AGREEMENT
AS THOSE RIGHTS CURRENTLY EXIST UNDER THE COMPREHENSIVE
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT RE ORANGE COUNTY INVESTMENT POOLS
(THE "CSA") . IN MANY CASES, THAT EFFECT MAY BE
ADVERSE.
INTRODUCTION
In response to the voters' defeat of the Measure R
Sales Tax proposal, the County of Orange (the "County") has
engaged in the process of developing an alternative recovery plan
which relies, in part, upon the diversion of future tax revenues
from other local governmental entities within the County.
Included among those from which the County sought reappropriation
by the California State Legislature was the Orange County
Transportation Authority (the "OCTA") . In order to limit the
County's access to the assets and revenues of special districts
and cities, most of which suffered substantial losses as a result
of the collapse of the Orange County Investment Pools, the Orange
County Investment Pool Participants Committee (the "Pool
Committee") has negotiated the terms of the accompanying Joint
Agreement.
Of particular note to Option A Pool Participants is
Paragraph 12 of the Joint Agreement in which the county agrees,
G\20066630.NP1
2221.5 -1
except for the recovery legislation that was passed in September
of 1995:
"not to request of the Legislature, nor otherwise
support if requested or approved by any entity other
than the County, the diversion of revenue allocated to
the undersigned Option A Pool Participant for the
purpose of financing the repayment of claims in the
County's debt adjustment case or the payment of claims
under the County's Plan of Adjustment."
This provision is intended to make it politically difficult for
the County to seek, and to provide substantial moral suasion
against the County seeking, further diversions of revenues from
other local governmental entities within the County.However, this
provision does not seek to preclude the County from seeking such
reappropriations in response to natural disasters or other cir-
cumstances beyond the payment of claims against the County in
connection with its bankruptcy proceeding.
The Joint Agreement may, in some cases, improve the
status of the remaining outstanding claims of an Option A Pool
Participant which signs the Joint Agreement (a "Participating
Option A Pool Participant") ; and, in other cases, it may worsen
it. Each Option A Pool Participant should consider carefully the
impact of the Joint Agreement upon its rights under the CSA and
applicable law and the potential benefits to be derived by such
Pool Participant from the provisions of the Joint Agreement.
CONSENSUS LEGISLATION
In accordance with the Joint Agreement, the California
State Legislature passed on September 15, 1995, and Governor
Wilson subsequently signed into law, several bills which will,
upon becoming effective:
1. Reallocate to the County $38 million of
sales tax revenue currently allocated to the OCTA or
the Orange County Transit District for a period of 15
years beginning July 1, 1996;
2. Reallocate to the OCTA $23 million of
the County's yearly apportionment of Motor Vehicle Fuel
Taxes for a 16 year period beginning July 1, 1997;
3. Reallocate to the County $4 million of
property taxes per year for a period of 20 years (plus
0\Z006663Z.W
12211S -2-
increments in such taxes in (a) and (b) below)
beginning July 1, 1996 from each of:
(a) the County Harbors, Beaches and
Parks Fund;
(b) the County Flood Control Fund; and
(c) the County Development Agency.
The effect of this legislation will be to divert $15 million per
year for 15 years (a total of $225 million) from the OCTA to the
County, along with $12 million per year for 20 years ($240
million in total) from County-controlled agencies to the County
to fund the issuance of new municipal debt. The proceeds of the
new debt issue will be used to pay off the County's pre-
bankruptcy note holders and certain other creditors.
Such legislation is to take effect only if a Plan of
Adjustment for the County consistent with the Joint Agreement is
confirmed in the County's bankruptcy or upon the appointment of
a trustee for the County by the Governor as described in the last
paragraph of this Executive Summary. Under the recovery legis-
lation, all revenues received by the County pursuant to such
legislation must be used for the performance of the County's
obligations under its Plan of Adjustment. If any of the diver-
sions from Flood Control, Harbors, Beaches and Parks, or the
Redevelopment Agency are successfully challenged, the County is
required to make up the shortfall from the County general
account.
TERMS OF THE PLAN OF ADJUSTMENT
The Joint Agreement requires the County to prepare and
file as soon as possible, and by no later than January 1, 1996,
a Plan of Adjustment which contains, in substance, the terms and
conditions specified in the Joint Agreement. Under the Joint
Agreement, participating Option A Pool Participants waive all
rights to object to, and agree to accept, any County Plan of
Adjustment which contains provisions incorporating the material
terms in the Joint Agreement. Importantly, under the Joint
Agreement, the County's Plan may provide for payment in full of
the allowed claims of all County vendors, employees and short
term note debt. It also permits the County to restore up to $15
million in reserve for County Certificates of Participation which
have previously been depleted.
Under the CSA, Settlement Secured Claims are "allowed
general unsecured claims against the County. " Repayment Claims
6IMNI.31,.Pi
122195 -3-
are defined under the CSA as "allowed . . . claims" against the
County as well, but the holder of a Repayment Claim
"shall not be entitled to receive . any payment
. . . from the County [other than from the
proceeds of the litigation of Pool-Related Claims (as
defined in the CSA) against third parties] until after
the payment in full of all Senior Claims against the
County and the payment in full of all interest on such
Senior Claims which accrues or matures after the County
Petition Date . . . . "
The "Senior Claims" to which Repayment Claims are subordinated
under the CSA include the vendor and employee claims and the
short term notes which may be paid in full under the County's
Plan pursuant to the Joint Agreement, the $275 million in
Recovery Bonds issued by the County, the proceeds of which were
paid to Option A Pool Participants in June of this year, and
Option A Pool Participants' Settlement Secured Claims. Under the
CSA, the County may also restore a portion of the losses suffered
by County Administered Accounts in advance of making any payment
on Repayment Claims other than from the proceeds of the Pool-
Related Claim litigation.
Under the Joint Agreement, both Settlement Secured
Claims and Repayment Claims would become non-recourse claims.
This means that they would no longer be debts for which the
County would be responsible. Rather, holders of Settlement
Secured Claims and Repayment Claims could look only to the
proceeds of third-party litigation of Pool-Related Claims and to
the $50 million litigation fund to he set up under the Joint
Agreement to prosecute those claims.
A five member Orange County Recovery Committee ("OCRA")
is to be appointed to evaluate the County's Plan of Adjustment
for consistency with the Joint Agreement and the CSA. Its
members will be Mr. Hayes, two individuals appointed by the
County and two individuals appointed by the Pool Committee, one
of whom is to be a city representative. The OCRA would be
disbanded once the County's Plan of Adjustment is confirmed.
POOL-RELATED CLAIMS LITIGATION
The County's Plan must also provide for the appointment
of a Representative under Section 1123 (b) (3) (B) of the Bankruptcy
Code to "enforce, prosecute and collect upon" all of the County's
and Option A Pool Participants' Pool-Related Claims against the
brokerage houses, banks and professionals which are, at least in
part, responsible for the losses in the Orange County Investment
Pools. The Representative is required to keep the Pool Committee
and its counsel informed concerning the progress of such litiga-
G\Z00666JI.NR,
122295 -4-
tion, including in the manner specified in Exhibit 6 to the CSA.
However, the Representative would have
"the sole and absolute discretion in all matters
concerning the prosecution, collection, settlement and
compromise of Pool-Related Claims subject only to such
jurisdiction as may be retained by the Bankruptcy Court
pursuant to the Plan of Adjustment."
Under the Joint Agreement, the Representative also has "sole and
absolute discretion" in determining what portions of the net
proceeds from the litigation of such claims are to be distributed
and when, although the legislation recently passed by the
California State Legislature requires that all interest earned
on the Litigation Fund be distributed annually. The
Representative will initially be Mr. Tom Hayes.
DISTRIBUTION OF LITIGATION PROCEEDS
Under the CSA net proceeds from Pool-Related Claims
litigation are to be distributed approximately 62% (rather than
65% had all Pool Participants elected Option A under the CSA) to
the holders of Settlement Secured Claims and approximately 38%
to the County until all Settlement Secured Claims are paid in
full (a total of $525,457,359) . Then, approximately 62% of the
net proceeds of such litigation are to be distributed to the
holders of Repayment Claims and approximately 38% to the County
until the Repayment Claims are paid in full (a total of an addi-
tional approximately $798, 367,684) . Thereafter, the County is
entitled to retain all of the net proceeds of such litigation
until it has received at least $236.7 million.
Under the Joint Agreement, the first $54.7 million in
the net proceeds of such litigation would be paid to satisfy
Repayment Claims held by the Option A Pool Participants listed
on Exhibit 1 to the CSA (the "Schools") . The next $325 million
of the net proceeds of such Pool-Related Claim litigation would
be paid to the holders of Settlement Secured Claims to repay
those claims in full. This means that holders of Settlement
Secured Claims would fare worse under the Joint Agreement until
approximately $144 million in net litigation proceeds have been
collected; then they would fare better until the Settlement
Secured Claims are paid in full.
After all Settlement Secured Claims are paid in full,
the next $202.8 million of net litigation proceeds would be
distributed solely to the County, $22 million of which may be
used by the County solely to settle the claims of the option B
Pool Participants. Thereafter, the next $713 million in net
litigation proceeds would be distributed 61_59$ to the, holders
of Repayment Claims and approximately 38.41% to the County.
G\Z0 631.IMI
122196 -5-
Accordingly, under the Joint Agreement, holders of Repayment
Claims, other than the Schools, would be in a worse position than.
they would be under the CSA until such claims are paid in full.
After $1.295.5 billion in net litigation proceeds has been
collected, in order to restore a portion of the funds diverted
from the OCTA under the recovery legislation described above, the
OCTA would receive approximately 43% of the next $525 million in
net litigation proceeds and the County would retain the balance.
Thereafter, net litigation proceeds would be split between
Option A Pool Participants and the County 61. 59%/38.41%.
Under the Joint Agreement any portion of the $50
million Litigation Fund which is not used in pursuing Pool-
Related Claims would also be available for distribution in
accordance with the scheme described above. No such fund is
established under the CSA.
Lastly, the Joint Agreement requires the County to
apply the first net litigation proceeds it receives under the
scheme described above to repay the claims of Option A Pool
Participants against certain enumerated County Administered
Accounts which the Pool Committee and the County have identified
as containing the funds of some option A Pool Participants. No
such provision exists under the CSA.
TREATMENT OF CLAIMS AGAINST COUNTY ADMINISTERED ACCOUNTS
Promptly after execution and Bankruptcy Court approval
of the Joint Agreement, the County is required to distribute to
those Option A Pool Participants that sign the Joint Agreement,
to the extent they are lawfully entitled to such amounts under
applicable non-bankruptcy law and to the extent of any portion
of a claim therefor is not being disputed by the County, all
amounts which remain, after allocation of the Orange County
Investment Pool losses, and including both pre- and post-
petition interest earned on the cash balances therein, in 54
specified County Administered Accounts and such other accounts
as the Pool Committee and the County may jointly agree. In
return, Participating Option A Pool Participants agree not to
object to any other distributions from such accounts to those who
are legally entitled to those distributions. Under Paragraph
8 (i) of the Joint Agreement, the County's Plan of Adjustment must
provide that
"all claims based upon . deficiencies in County
Administered Accounts resulting from . . . losses in
the Orange County Investment Pools . held by the
County will receive the same treatment" as such claims
held by Option A Pool Participants.
cN2202 W.W
I22D5 -6-
However, under the Joint Agreement, the Plan may provide for the
payment of such claims to Option A Pool Participants over a
period of 20 years without interest. The Joint Agreement calls
for all Participating Option A Pool Participants to also waive
any post-petition, post-confirmation and post-effective date
interest on their claims for recovery of the deficits in the
County Administered Accounts.
The County also waives its rights to interest on the
deficits in all County Administered Accounts and agrees that the
$13.4 million County Administered Account deficit claims of the
Schools with respect to 19 unapportioned tax accounts maintained
by the County shall be paid before the County's own claims.
Participating Non-School option A Pool Participants would agree
to a similar time of payment priority for the schools.
MISCELLANEOUS CONTRACTUAL PROVISIONS
Participating Option A Pool Participants and the Pool
Committee agree to suspend and, upon Bankruptcy Court approval
of the County's Plan of Adjustment, to dismiss with prejudice all
appeals they have pending relating to the Bankruptcy Court's
Order of June 27, 1995 approving the County's compromise with its
short term note holders regarding the validity of their note debt
and approving the roll-over of that debt to June 30, 1996. It
is a condition to the effectiveness of the Joint Agreement, which
the County has the sole ability to waive, that the Orange County
Cities Subcommittee separately agree to do so as well.
The Joint Agreement also confirms the discontinuation
of the County Is Arterial Highway Financing Program (the 11AHFP") .
Under that program the County provided funding of over $3 million
per year, administered by the OCTA, for distribution to Orange
County cities for the repair and improvement of roads and high-
ways throughout the County. The parties to the Joint Agreement
specifically agree that the AHFP will not be funded in the future
by either the County or the OCTA.
There are also provisions in the Joint Agreement for
the accounts of the Schools Subcommittee and the Orange County
Cities Subcommittee in the Professional Fee Reserve established
under the CSA to be replenished with a portion the Withheld
Proceeds ($2 million and $1.2 million, respectively) which would
otherwise be distributed under the CSA to Schools and option A
Orange County Cities.
The Joint Agreement would become effective only if:
a. signed by all Option A Pool Participants
(a condition which the County can waive) ; and
0\200666)F.NAF
122196 -7
b. the Joint Agreement is approved by the
Bankruptcy Court. '
TREATMENT OF POOL PARTICIPANTS WHO DO NOT SIGN JOINT AGREEMENT
Paragraph 20 of the Joint Agreement provides that there
are to be no third party beneficiaries of the Joint Agreement and
that the Joint Agreement is not intended to waive any claims
against or adversely affect the rights of any person or entity
which is not a party to the agreement. Other than that, the
Joint Agreement is silent as to the effect of the agreement upon
Option A Pool Participants which choose n= to sign it or upon
Option B Pool Participants (which are not being asked to sign the
agreement) . This means that Option A Pool Participants holding
Settlement Secured Claims would not benefit from the County's
agreement to permit net proceeds from Pool-Related Claims
litigation to be applied first to such claims, nor would such
Pool Participants' Settlement Secured or Repayment Claims be
voluntarily made non-recourse or subordinated other than as
provided now in the CSA.
However, the bills passed by the State Legislature
include a mechanism for the appointment of a trustee by the
Governor if the County fails to file a Plan of Adjustment con-
sistent with the Joint Agreement by January 1, 1996 or if the
Governor determines that as of May 1, 1996 or at any time there-
after the County, the Committee of Unsecured Creditors and the
Pool Committee "have failed to reach substantial agreement on the
terms of a plan of adjustment and the timely confirmation of the
plan appears unlikely." The trustee would have not only all of
the powers of the Board of Supervisors, but also, "solely to the
extent necessary to prevent denial of confirmation of the plan
of adjustment " the following powers, among others, of Non-
County Pool Participants which are governmental entities:
a. to vote to accept or reject the Plan of
Adjustment; and
b. to subordinate or otherwise restructure
Pool Participants' claims against the County which are
based upon investment losses in the Pools.
In other words, if a trustee is appointed for the County, that
trustee could, but would not be required to, agree to the treat-
ment of a Pool Participant's claims against the County in the
manner specified in the Joint Agreement or in a manner which is
better or worse than that specified in the Joint Agreement. The
only constraint upon the trustee in exercising such powers on
behalf of Pool Participants is that he "not act in a manner
inconsistent with the fair treatment of any [such Pool
Participants) . "
c\:ooscor.Ml
122115 —8—
jhN-23-96 TUE 16:10 _ P. U7
PILLSBURY MADISON 6 SUTRO
San Francisco 101 V. Broadway Los Angeles
San Jose Suite 1800 Dashington, D.C.
Sacramento San Diego. CA 92102-8083 Orange County
Menlo Park Tel (619)234-5000 Fax (619)236-1995 Nov York
Hong gong Tokyo
January 23, 1996
FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL
TOY Blake Anderson (714) 962-0356
Paul Brady (714) 724-6045
Andrew Czorny (714) 378-3372
Walter Kreutzen (714) 436-9848
Michael D. Martello (415) 967-4215
John L. Nelson (714) 662-3570
Stan Oftelie (714) 560-5796
Kennard R. Smart (714) 835-7787
Alan G. Tippie (213) 629-4520
Merrill R. Francis (213) 620-1390
G. Larry Engel (714) 752-7522
Allan H. Ickowitz (213) 612-7801
Clark F. Ide (714) 378-3373
Paul R. Glassman (310) 312-9507
John T. Hansen (415) 398-2438
Alan Martin (714) 851-0739
Thomas L, Woodruff (714) B35-7787
John J. Giovannone (714) 851-0739
B. Freddie Reiss (213) 622-5063+
Michael Ozawa (714) 435-8774
Jon Schotz (310) 920-0313
FROM: Patrick C. Shea, Esq. USSR NO. :11364PCS
(J. Samala)
FILE NO. : 66345-100-0001
NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER SHEET: 3
IF YOU HAVE NOT PROPERLY RECEIVED THIS FACSIMILE,
PLEASE CALL OS AT (619)234-5000
THANK YOU.
Letter to Pool Participants regarding status of Merrill Lynch
litigation.
OPERATOR: TIME ENT:
w 7HR INFORMATION GOHTAINEO S TAW SAGE IS ATTORNEY PEIVILIUSU ADD Sam IAL nR58MA]'i ED Y OSE
OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY SAW AIM. Iy T08 READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE ISTISIXED RRCIPIEHT, OR TIM m@nnEE UR AGENT
RESMSIBLE TO DEAMM IT TO TBE INIRNDFD RECIFIENT, YOU ARE RESENT NOTIFIED 1DAT ANY DINEMATLOD. DISINSSUTIDN OR COPYING OF
=8 COMMUNICATION IS STRICTLY 1E031511RD. IF Too SAVE RECEIVED THIS QDaUHlCAl'ION IN SRPOR. FLEASE Iq®TATMLY NOTIFY US by
TTIMMINR, AND RETOFD THE ORSGIRAL MESSAGE TO US AT THE A= ADDRESS VIA THE U.S. F027AL SESVICR. TUN YOU.
20olo5:
JM-23-96 TUE 16:11 V.UZ
I/W of il[fb ai
PILLSBURY MADISON G SUTRO LLP
c.Y[p.Nacco sun[ iaeo
•W+NOais 101 WE TBpoAVN'Av eWMaL COV MT
LMN�ocL
MGNIN OTOM.O.c. LAN a1E60. CALIFORNIA i2101��— NLM MNa
1MIiL p'B Oii1CL M10 TLLLDMON[01B1 316 O00 TOInIDO
NOMO WNO
OIO LCT O.A.M V YL[O i+®IN ILB MI.UB-IBBS N[W YOpF
(619) 544-3177
January 22, 1996
VIA TELECOPIER
TO! ORANGE COUNTY INVESTMENT POOL
PARTICIPANTS ' DISTRIBUTION LIST
Re: In re Count of Oran e,
ankruptcy Case No. SA9 - 272-JR
County of Orange v. Merrill Lynch 6 Co. , Inc. at al.
Dear Pool Participant.
This letter will update you regarding the status of the
County of Orange litigation against Merrill Lynch.
The principal parties have commenced taking depositions.
Merrill Lynch appeared in Court today on a motion to stay the
County's discovery until the depositions of Merrill Lynch
employees can be coordinated with discovery proceedings in other
bankruptcy-related litigation. Specifically, Merrill Lynch
sought to avoid producing its representatives for deposition,
including Mr. Michael Stamenson, until the County filed all of
its complaints against other professionals and brokerage houses.
Merrill Lynch argued that its representatives would otherwise
risk being deposed in each adversary proceeding. (There are
currently only two filed adversary proceedings - Merrill Lynch
and MPMG Peat Marwick.) In addition, Merrill Lynch sought to
lift the current stay on obtaining documents and testimony from
Pool Participants. The Merrill Lynch motion was unsuccessful on
both issues.
In denying the Merrill Lynch request for consolidation, the
Court reiterated its intention that the parties proceed with all
non-Pool Participant discovery without limitation. In addition,
the Court continued the stay on pool participants discovery to
pending the hearing on the County's motion to strike portions of
the Merrill Lynch Answer. That motion is scheduled to be heard
February 16, 1996 at 9s3U a.m.
JAN-23-96 TOE 16:06 uo
To All Pool Participants
January 22, 1996
Page 2
The parties reached an agreement regarding the exchange of
SEC transcripts . Pursuant to this arrangement, Merrill Lynch
and the County will exchange all SEC transcripts. The employees
of Merrill Lynch and the County, including the Board of
Supervisors, were given ten days to object to the production of
their transcripts . If no objection is asserted, the transcript
must be produced.
Finally, the Court ruled that the deposition of Mr.
Stamenson will go forward on January 29, 1996 . Mr. Stamenson
has until January 25, 1996 to file any objection to the
production of his SEC transcript. The Court has scheduled a
hearing for Friday, January 26, 1996 at 3:30 p.m. to rule on the
objections, if any.
In general, these rulings indicate an intent by the Court
to keeping the case moving.
I will continue to keep you updated regarding the status of
this matter. if you have any questions, you can reach me at
(619) 544-3177 .
Very truly yours"
Awlt,e,
Patrick C. She,
yew
PCs/sgm
cc: Official Committee of Pool Participants and Counsel
aues7m9
February 14, 1996 - —
MEMORANDUM
TO: Executive Committee Members
FROM: Blake P. Anderson
Chief Operations Officer
SUBJECT: Questions and Answers re Joint Agreement
The following information was prepared by Paul Glassman, attorney for the Cities. It is
addressed to "Cities" but it also applies to "Special Districts."
CBDOC • P.O.Boa 8127 0 Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 0 (714)962-2411
PAUL R. GLASSMAN
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
11400 WEST OLYMPIC BOULEVARD, SUITE 250
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90064
PHONE: (310) 312-9505
FAX: (310) 312-9507
February 8, 1996
To: Pool Participants Committee
Re: In Re County of Orange
Case No. SA-94-22272-JR
Dear Committee Members:
At the request of Paul Brady, I am providing you with a courtesy copy of
the enclosed document entitled "The Joint Agreement: Questions and Answers"
("Q and A'). The Q and A was prepared for use by the Cities in connection with
their analyses and review of the Joint Agreement of the County of Orange, the
Official Investment Pool Participants' Committee and Each Option A Pool
Participant for Resolution of Claims Against the County of Orange ("Joint
Agreement). It was not prepared for use by or distribution to any other party.
In addition to the above, there have been clarifications and changes
requested from the County in regard to several issues relating to the Plan which
may affect the answers given under the Q and A. It is also possible that the Plan
of Adjustment and the Disclosure Statement may be amended in a way which
would alter the answers given under the Q and A. For these and other reasons,
the current answers to the Q and A may not be the "final" answers.
�4�
Paul R. Glassman P.C.
&
Mitchell, Sliberberg & Knupp
The Joint Agreement: Questions and Answers
1. What payments will my City receive under the Joint
Agreement and are their other benefits to the Cities under this
agreement?
If the Joint Agreement becomes "effective", each City which
signs the Joint Agreement should receive approximately 75%
of the "undisputed portion" of its County Administered a
Accounts ("CAA" or "CAAs") within 30 days of the
agreement becoming "effective". While the County has not
definitively agreed to an "undisputed schedule" for the CAAs,
the best information currently available is found in the last �.
schedules of the CAAs provided by the County. The "disputed
portion" will not be paid until the County and the affected
City reach accommodation or the Bankruptcy Court determines
the "allowed" amount.
In addition to the above, the Joint Agreement provides for
certain other benefits to the Cities, including but not limited
to: a) the County's agreement not to seek further diversion of
funds to finance its Plan of Adjustment ("Plan"); b) the
Representative's control of the Merrill Lynch and other "Pool
Related" litigation; c) the payment of Litigation Proceeds to
the Cities under the Comprehensive Settlement Agreement
("CSA") will be reordered so that, depending upon the level of
recovery, the Cities may be paid earlier; and d) through a side
letter to the Joint Agreement, the County agrees to release
certain "Withheld Proceeds." c Z
I
2. What will my City give up under the Joint Agreement?
If the Joint Agreement becomes "effective", each City which
signs the Joint Agreement will waive most of its rights to
object to the Plan and certain of its rights under the CSA will
be modified. However, the Cities rights to sue designated
third parties, including their own advisors, is not affected by
the Joint Agreement. Please note that the Cities right to sue
the County's advisors (e.g. Merrill Lynch and KPMG) for
CAA losses was given up under the CSA. Under the CSA the
Cities also gave up their rights to make a claim against the
County for damages.
3. If my City signs the Joint Agreement, will its County
Administered Account claims be paid within 30 days of
signing?
No. No payments will be made under the Joint Agreement �P`�
until the Joint Agreement becomes "effective" (i.e. all Option
A Pool Participants and the County sign the agreement and the
Bankruptcy Court approves the agreement).
4. Can the Joint Agreement become "effective" if all Option A
Pool Participants don't sign up7
Yes, but only the County can waive the requirement that all
Option A Pool Participants must sign the Joint Agreement.
Please note that the requirement that the Bankruptcy Court .
approve the Joint Agreement is prohahly not waivable.
2
5. If my City chooses not to-sign the Joint Agreemcnt will its
CAA claims still be paid?
Currently, the County takes the position that only those Cities
which execute the Joint Agreement (assuming that it becomes
"effective") will he paid their CAA claims. The County also
contends that there is no mechanism under the County's
proposed Plan for paying CAAs to the Cities. If the County's
position is correct, the CAA claim of a City which chooses not
to sign the Joint Agreement will be in "legal limbo" and
would probably be addressed through litigation, a new Plan or
a separate settlement.
6. How will the undisputed "deficiency" or shortfall portion of
the CAA claims be paid under the Joint Agreement?
Notwithstanding the language in the Joint Agreement to the
contrary, the County takes the position that the
deficiencies/shortfalls in the CAAs are not paid under the Joint
Agreement but are dealt with under the Plan. The current
version of the Plan provides that most of these deficiency ,,DtrA
claims will be paid out of certain Litigation Proceeds and
related funds (as defined in the Plan) and Available Cash (also
as dcfmcd in the Plan). Howcver, the Plan also provides that
certain types of undisputed deficiency CAA claims--such as
eminent domain claims-- will be restored in full on, or as
promptly as possible after, the Effective Date or will be paid
as provided by state law.
3
7. What does the Joint Agreement mean when it provides that
CSA claims (i.e. the Settlement Secured Claims and
Repayment Claims) are "non-recourse" against the County and
"recourse" only against third party recoveries?
This is a change in the rights of the Cities under the CSA.
The "recourse" and "non-recourse" language in the Joint q3 Y
Agreement mcans that the Cities are entitled to be paid their 5 Y
CAA deficiency claims only out of the Litigation Proceeds and �;
Available Cash and will not have any recourse against the LL
County or its general funds. Under the CSA, the claims were
previously "recourse" against the County and its general funds.
8. Are Option B Pool Participant Cities eligible to sign the
Joint Agreement?
The County takes the position that Option B Pool Participants
Cities cannot participate in the Joint Agreement and that their
rights are unaffected by the Joint Agreement
9. What does the five person Orange County Recovery
Committee ("Committee") do and what is the Cities role on
this Committee?
The Committee reviews and evaluates any Plan of Adjustment
or Disclosure Statement filed with the Bankruptcy Court to
determine if they are inconsistent with the terns of the Joint
Agreement and/or the Comprehensive Settlement Agreement.
One of the members of the Committee will be a City
representative.
4
10. What will Mr. Thomas Hayes role as the Representative
entail?
Mr. Hayes will have complete control over litigation,
including, but not limited to the Merrill Lynch litigation and
the KPMG litigation. He can settle, prosecute or dismiss
litigation as he deems advisable.
11. Will the Governor appoint a "Trustee" for the County if
the Joint Agreement becomes "effective"?
Even if the Joint Agreement becomes "effective" the Governor
will retain the right to appoint a Trustee if the Plan is not
approved by the Bankruptcy Court by May 1, 1996. However,
should the Governor choose to exercise this right he must first
consult with various individuals delineated in the legislation
and make a determination that the prospects of rcurganization
are unlikely.
12. If my City approves the Joint Agreement, is it at the same
time approving the Plan?
No. They are separate, with the Joint Agreement being
approved first and the Plan later. The Joint Agreement deals
only with the CSA claims and a portion of the CAA claims
(approximately 75%), while the Plan deals with the deficiency
in the CAAs and all other claims. As a practical matter, a
City which signs the Joint Agreement is waiving most of its
rights to object to the Plan. (SEE ANSWER 2).
5
BANKRUPTCY UPDATE
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING
FEBRUARY 21 , 1996
THE JOINT AGREEMENT COMBINED WITH THE
COUNTY'S DRAFT PLAN OF ADJUSTMENT WILL
ACCOMPLISH THE FOLLOWING OBJECTIVES:
• Helps end Orange County bankruptcy by June 1996.
• Removes threat of a State-imposed Trustee.
• Removes "cloud" over the municipal market.
• Avoids further revenue diversions by the County.
• Signing Option A Pool Participants will receive better priority in
litigation recoveries.
• Schools will receive super-priority on $55 million of litigation
recoveries.
• Available withheld proceeds paid immediately. ($6.2 million)
• Undisputed , post-bankruptcy County administered accounts
(plus interest), paid immediately. ($ 1 .8 million for CSDOC)
• CAA deficiencies of $234 million paid over 20 years without
interest with first payment priority to schools ($15.5 million)
HELPS END ORANGE COUNTY BANKRUPTCY
• County filed a Plan of Adjustment on Dec. 21 , 1995.
• County filed a Disclosure Statement on Jan. 19, 1996.
• Signing Pool Participants cannot object to the Plan of Adjustment if it
complies with the material terms and conditions in the May
Comprehensive Settlement Agreement and the December Joint
Agreement.
• Five-member Orange County Recovery Committee will monitor
compliance with the plan.
- Tom Hayes will chair the Committee,
- Two County-named members; Two OCIP-named members (one of
which will be a City representative).
• Tom Hayes "to enforce, prosecute and collect upon" County and OCIP
claims against Merrill Lynch and others.
SIGNING OPTION A POOL PARTICIPANTS
WILL RECEIVE ADDITIONAL PRIORITY
IN LITIGATION RECOVERIES
LAYER MILLIONS BENEFICIARY TOTAL
1 $54.7 Schools $ 54.7
2 325.0* Option A 379.9
3 202.8 County 582.7
4 712.8** Option A/County (62/38) 1295.5
5 400.0 OCTA/County (25/75) 1695.5
6 125.0 OCTA 1820.5
7 Balance Option A/County (62/38)
`Settlement Secured Claims.
`*Includes Unsecured Repayment Claims.
REMOVES THREAT OF A STATE-IMPOSED
TRUSTEE
• Governor, according to state legislation , may appoint a
trustee if:
- After January 1 , 1996 a Plan of Adjustment has not been
submitted to the Bankruptcy Court (Plan submitted);
- After May 1 , 1996 there is not substantial agreement on
the Plan of Adjustment.
• Trustee can force Pool Participants to "agree" by a) voting
on their behalf or, b) subordinating their claims.
• The use of the Trustee's powers shall not be inconsistent
with "fair treatment" under the Joint Agreement.
POOL PARTICIPANTS CONTRIBUTION
• OCTA gives the County net $ 15 million annually for 15
years ($202 million total). OCTA receives in return
Subordinated Claim (litigation proceeds layers 6 & 7).
• Remaining $819 million of Settlement Secured Claims
and Repayment claims become non-recourse to the
County.
- Payable only from litigation recoveries.
- $819 million of SSC and Repayment Claims
removed from the County's balance sheet.
• Deficiencies of County Administered Accounts paid
over 20 years without interest.
• Arterial Highway Financing Program .
REMOVES "CLOUD" OVER THE MUNICIPAL
MARKET
• Short-term debt of $800 million will be paid by
June 30, 1996.
• $ 15 million Debt Service Reserves for existing COPs
will be replenished .
• Vendor and employee claims will be paid by June 30,
2006 (estimated to be $65 million + $35 million).
• County to fund the Plan of Adjustment with a long-term
bond offering (estimated>$700 million).
COUNTY CONTRIBUTIONS
• Existing revenues - $10 million annually from Teeter.
- $15 million annually for 20 years from Trash Importation.
• County proposed revenues are used first to fund the Plan of Adjustment:
- $4 million annually for 20 years from Harbor, Beaches & Parks.
- $4 million annually for 20 years from Flood Control.
- $4 million annually for 20 years from County Development Agency.
- $105 million one-time contribution (assets sales, COP and Teeter
financing).
• Cash balances in County Administered Accounts due to Pool
Participants are released.
• Schools to receive $13.4 million of withheld property taxes.
• Available Withheld Proceeds to be distributed as soon as possible.
TREATMENT OF NON-SIGNING OPTION A
PARTICIPANTS (AND OPTION B'S WHO ARE NOT BEING
ASKED TO SIGN THE JOINT AGREEMENT)
• Joint Agreement provides "No third party beneficiaries."
• Joint Agreement not intended to waive claims against or
adversely affect rights of any entity not party to it.
• Non-signing Option A's will not get improved litigation
proceeds.
• Non-signing Option A's do not give up fully allowed secured
and non-secured claims (CSDOC total of $94 million).
• However, Trustee can act on an Option A & B participant's
behalf as long as it's not inconsistent with "fair treatment. "
J MPDOMGMSANDERM022196.RP1
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
FEBRUARY 28, 1996
Districts 5 and 6
Agenda Item (25): Consideration of motion approving Change Order
No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Replacement
of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3, and
Balboa Boulevard Sewer Replacement and
Abandonment of 47th Street Pump Station Project,
City of Newport Beach, Contract No. 5-37-3,
authorizing an addition of$232,610.00 to the contract
with Walton Construction Company for six items of
additional work, and granting a time extension of
60 calendar days for completion of said additional
work.
Summary
This $2.4 million project consists of replacing the old 30-inch sewer with a new Winch vitrified
clay pipe (VCP) gravity sewer and appurtenances in Pacific Coast Highway from Bitter Point
Pump Station to the Arches (Newport Boulevard) and modifications of connection City of
Newport Beach sewers to Bayside Drive trunk sewer for County Sanitation Districts Nos. 5 and
6 . In addition, gravity sewers and appurtenances and abandonment of a pump station in
Balboa Boulevard for the City of Newport Beach. The following is a summary of the contract
amount:
Original Contract Amount: $1,985,000.00
Previously Authorized Changes: $ 60,458.03
Amount of Change Order No. 2(Add)(Dedusl) $ 232,610.00
Amended Contract Price: $2,278,068.03
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 2, for six Hems of added work for an addition
of$232,610.00 to the contract with Wal-Con Construction Company.
J:kW PDMBSwcssrreese125.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
oI ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
February 28, 1996
1p ELLI6 AVENUE
0o aa%et2>
EpUNTAM VALLEY.CALWOMIA 1121269121
STAFF REPORT ma19523 11
Districts 5 and 6
PDC96-08: Approval of Change Order No. 2 to the Plans and Specifications to Replacement of
Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3, and Balboa Boulevard Sewer
Replacement and Abandonment of 47th Street Pump Station Project, City of
Newport Beach, Contract No. 5-37-3
Summary
In September 1994, the Directors approved the plans and specifications for Contract No. 5-37-3,
Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3 and Balboa Boulevard Sewer Main
Replacement from 45th Street to West Coast Highway and Abandonment of 47th Street Pump Station
Project, City of Newport Beach. The sewer is used to transport wastewater collected from the
collection system of the Cities of Costa Mesa and Newport Beach to Treatment Plant No. 2.
The $2.4 million project consists, in general, of replacing the old 30-inch sewer with a new 36-inch
vitrified clay pipe (VCP)gravity sewer and appurtenances in Pacific Coast Highway from Bitter Point
Pump Station to the Arches (Newport Boulevard), Contract No. 5-37-3 and modification of connecting
City of Newport Beach sewers to Bayside Drive trunk sewer for County Sanitation District Nos. 5 and 6
(80% District No. 5; 20% District No. 6). In addition, gravity sewers and appurtenances and
abandonment of a pump station in Balboa Boulevard for the City of Newport Beach.
Change Order No. 2 is a net addition of$232,610.00 to the contract for six items of added work and a
time extension of 60 calendar days. This project was designed by Boyle Engineering Corporation. The
construction contract was awarded in October 1994 to Wal-Con Construction Company. Due to the
state of affairs surrounding the bankruptcy and its related fiscal impact, the notice to proceed was
extended to August 1, 1995.
Item 1, in the amount of$32,082.00 and 7 calendar days time extension, is for the removal and
reconnection of a 24-inch DIP valve and 24-inch bleed-off line that represented a conflict during
construction. As-built drawings did not disclose this facility, and therefore was not depicted on the
contract drawings.
Item 2, in the amount of$131,577.00 and 32 calendar days time extension, is for the removal and
disposal of undisclosed concrete encasement and rock encountered during the construction of the
Bitterpoint Pump Station-Pacific Coast Highway crossing. Interfering rock, concrete encasements, and
other unsuitable materials were not shown on the contract drawings.
Item 3, in the amount of$7,569.00 and 3 calendar days time extension, is for a direct conflict with an
undisclosed utility(2-inch gas line tail)that was not shown on the contract drawings, nor included on
any as-built drawings.
Item 4, in the amount of$20,931.00 and 6 calendar days time extension, is for the use of an alternative
backfill material in lieu of specified materials. This decision was based on undisclosed and inferior
sub-surface materials that were not indicated on the contract documents.
Item 5, in the amount of$35,821.00 and 9 calendar days time extension, is for the removal and
isolation of a 27-inch forcemain that was shown on the contract documents to be abandoned, but was
determined to be in use during construction.
PDC96-08
Page 2
February 1, 1996
Item 6, in the amount of$4,630.00 and 3 calendar days time extension, is for the removal and
replacement of damaged asphalt concrete pavement outside the contract trench limits. Undisclosed
sub-surface materials (e.g. boulders, etc.) removed during construction contributed to the damaged
pavement sections.
Items 1 and 5 are design omissions related to contract drawings that failed to correctly incorporate
existing as-built information. Staff will proceed with attempt to recover some portion of the costs from
the designer.
Items 2, 3, 4, and 6 are for changes that would have been included in the original design if discovered
or known in the design phase.
The original contract amount for the project was$1,985,000.00. The amount of change orders to date
is $293,068.03 representing a net increase of 14.76% over the original contract amount. The time
delays on this Change Order are not due to the Contractor's actions, but due to changed conditions
and undisclosed utilities. The liquidated damages are specified at $500.00 per day.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 2 for six items of additional work for an additional
$232,610.00 and 60 calendar days time extension with Wal-Con Construction Company.
BP:Idh:gc
ENGWGRRPTSZR02-01.96
Page 1 of 6
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Wal-Con Construction Comoanv C.O. No.: Two (2)
Date: February 28 1996
Job: Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3. and Balboa Boulevard
Sewer Replacement and Abandonment of 47th Street Pump Station Project. City of
Newport Beach, Contract No. 5-37-3
Consultant: Boyle Engineering Corporation
Amount of this Change Order(Add)(Bedve!) $232,610.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract
work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor,the following additions to or
deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
ITEM 1 - REMOVE AND RECONNECT 24-INCH DIP VALVE AND 24-INCH BLEED OFF LINE
The Contractor was directed to pothole and remove an interfering 24-inch DIP (Ductile Iron Pipe) bleed
off line from an existing 36-inch force main to existing manhole at Section 9+34 and reconnect this line
to a new 72-inch manhole at Station 9+18. During construction of the new manhole at Station 9+18
and the removal of an existing manhole at Station 9+34 a valve cover and bleed off line that tied into
the existing manhole was found to be in direct conflict with the construction of the new City of Newport
Beach 60-inch manhole located at the joint point of the existing 15-inch VCP (Vitrified Clay Pipe) and
the new 30-inch VCP line, and the base for the new 72-inch manhole located at Station 9+18. This line
was not reflected on the contract drawings. Costs for this item include labor, materials and equipment
for the added work plus extended overhead for the additional time to accomplish the work. This item of
work was accomplished by contractor force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General
Provisions. Reference: (FCO No. 1).
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 32,082.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 7 Calendar Days
ITEM 2 - REMOVAL OF UNDISCLOSED CONCRETE ENCASEMENT AND ROCK
For the Bitterpoint Pump Station- Pacific Coast Highway crossing, the Contractor was directed to
perform the following scope of work as part of this change order item:
1.) Remove concrete encasement around existing 30-inch gravity sewer line from joint
at new manhole located at Station 9+18 to an existing manhole at Station 44+12 (Plan 401)
2.) Remove concrete encasement around an existing 12-inch PVC vent line from an existing
manhole at Station 9+34 to a new 72-inch manhole at Station 9+17 and reconnect this line
to the above new manhole
3.) Remove interfering rock around proposed new City of Newport Beach manhole and gravity
sewer line located at the intersection of the bypass
Page 2 of 6
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Wal-Con Construction Company C.O. No.: Two (2)
Date: February 28, 1996
Job: Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3. and Balboa Boulevard
Sewer Replacement and Abandonment of 47th Street Pump Station Proiect. City of
Newport Beach, Contract No. 5-37-3
Consultant: Boyle Engineering Corporation
ITEM 2 - (CONTINUED)
4.) Remove boulders, rip-rap, wood shoring and other unsuitable material during the
construction of 36-inch VCP line from Station 9+18 to Station 44+12 (Plan 401 tie-in point)
For all of the aforementioned scope, none of the interfering rock, debris, boulders or concrete
encasements were shown on the contract drawings. The impact of the aforementioned undisclosed
subgrade material severely affected the Contractor's productivity by altering the planned construction
sequencing of work and forced the Contractor to change construction methods. All work for the
Bitterpoint Pump Station - Pacific Coast Highway crossing was in close proximity, and due to the rock,
concrete, etc., made the construction more labor intensive than planned, e.g., some functions had to
be performed by hand. It should also be noted that the mobilization and demobilization time expended
by the contract during each day of the subject crossing were extensive and at one time required 29-
8' x 10' to 8' x 20' steel plates to secure the trenches for public safety. Costs for this item include labor,
materials and equipment for the added work plus extended overhead for the additional time to
accomplish the work. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section
10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. Reference: (FCO Nos. 2 and 6)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $131,577.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 32 Calendar Days
ITEM 3- UTILITY CONFLICT WITH 2-INCH GAS LINE TAIL
The Contractor encountered a direct conflict with a 2-inch gas line and valve during the excavation and
placement of shields for the installation of 36-inch VCP line. This utility obstruction was not shown on
the contract drawings. To avoid the conflict during excavations, the Contractor was forced to alter his
construction methods by using 8-foot shields versus 10-toot shields, and doing some work by hand
versus using a breaker. Costs for this item include labor, materials and equipment for the added work
plus extended overhead for the additional time to accomplish the work. This item of work was
accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions.
Reference (FCO No. 2A).
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $7,569.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 3 Calendar Days
Page 3 of 6
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Wal-Con Construction Company C.O. No.: Two (2)
Date: February 28, 1996
Job: Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3. and Balboa Boulevard
Sewer Replacement and Abandonment of 47th Street Pump Station Proiect. City of
Newport Beach, Contract No. 5-37-3
Consultant: Boyle Engineering Corporation
ITEM 4 - ALTERNATIVE BACKFILL MATERIAL FOR 364NCH TRENCH
During the installation of 36-inch VCP (Vitrified Clay Pipe) line and the 24-inch bypass line between
Stations 9+22 and 9+87, the Contractor encountered boulders, rocks, concrete encasement, lumber
and other debris that impacted the stability of the trench side walls. This underground condition was
not indicated on the contract documents. To prevent the trench side walls from caving into the trench,
the Contractor was directed to use a 1 1/2 sack slurry mix in lieu of the specified backfill requirements.
This decision expedited the completion of the Bitterpoint Pump Station crossing, stabilizing the trench
walls by filling voids as the trench shields were moved, and minimized public impact. Costs for this
item include labor, materials and equipment for the added work plus extended overhead for the
additional time to accomplish the work. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor
pursuant to Section 10.6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. Reference: (FCO No. 3)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $20,931.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 6 Calendar Days
ITEMS- REMOVAL OF ABANDONED 27-INCH FORCE MAIN AND ISOLATION OF TIE- IN POINT AT
EXISTING 36-INCH LIVE FORCE MAIN
During the start of 36-inch VOID mainline construction at a location of approximately 13-feet east of new
manhole at Station 9+87, the Contractor encountered a 27-inch force main (cement mortar lined and
mortar coated) crossing the trench that was shown on the contract plans to be abandoned and cut and
plugged at both the south and north ends. When the Contractor proceeded to remove the line it was
found to be live. It was determined that under a previous contract, the subject line was only plugged
on the northside of Pacific Coast Highway, making it operational through the souhside at a point where
this line tied into a live 36-inch forcemain (Contract Nos. 5-29 and 5-31). The Contractor was forced to
locate valves and drain the line in order to property abandon the line. The Contractor incurred
additional costs to seal and plug the line(via welded steel plate) and remove unsuitable material from
the trench. Costs for this item include labor, materials and equipment for the added work plus
extended overhead for the additional time to accomplish the work. This item of work was
accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions.
Reference: (FCO No. 4)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $35,821.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 9 Calendar Days
Page 4 of 6
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
108"ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Wal-Con Construction Company C.O. No.: Two (2)
Date: February 28, 1996
Job: Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3, and Balboa Boulevard
Sewer Replacement and Abandonment of 47th Street Pump Station Proiect. City of
Newport Beach Contract No. 5-37-3
Consultant: Bovle Engineering Corporation
ITEM 6- REMOVE AND REPLACE ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT OUTSIDE OF CONTRACT
TRENCH LIMITS
During construction of facilities at the Bitterpoint Pump Station crossing, Contractor encountered
numerous boulders which when removed during excavation caused cracking and settlements to occur
outside the contract trench limits and cave-ins at the trench walls. As previously stated, these sub-
surface conditions were not indicated in the contract documents. In addition, abandoned shoring
timbers extending beyond the trench limits had to be removed. The Contractor was directed to remove
and replace in kind the aforementioned damaged paving areas (base pave over width trench) between
Stations 9+52 to 9+87. Costs for this item include labor, materials and equipment for the added work
plus extended overhead for the additional time to accomplish the work. This item of work was
accomplished by Contractors force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions.
Reference: (FCO No. 7)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $4,630.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 3 Calendar Days
TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $232.610.00
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER 60 Calendar Days
Page 5 of 6
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728.8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Wal-Con Construction Company C.O. No.: Two (2)
Date: February 28, 1996
Job: Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3. and Balboa Boulevard
Sewer Replacement and Abandonment of 47th Street Pump Station Proiect. City of
Newport Beach, Contract No. 5-37-3
Consultant: Boyle Engineering Corporation
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work
and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by
this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 60 days extension of
time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no direct or indirect, incidental or
consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except
as expressly granted and approve by this Change Order.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Onginal Contract Date:* August 1, 1995
Original Contract Time: 180 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date: January 27, 1996
Time Extension this C.O.: 60 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension: 120 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time: 300 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date: March 27, 1996
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable
Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable
'The original contract date was February 7, 1995. The "Notice to Proceed"was dated August 1, 1995
due to the bankruptcy.
Original Contract Price $ 1,985,000.00
Prev. Authorized Changes $ 60,458.03
This Change (Add) (Bedue!) $ 232,610.00
Amended Contract Price $ 2,278,068.03
Page 6 of 6
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Wal-Con Construction Company C.O. No.: Two (2)
Date: February 28, 1996
Job: Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3. and Balboa Boulevard
Sewer Replacement and Abandonment of 47th Street Pump Station Project. City of
Newport Beach, Contract No. 5-37-3
Consultant: Boyle Engineering Corporation
Board Authorization Dale: February 28, 1996
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Submitted by: Re mended by:
ngineitering Manager Dale C struction Manager Date
prov d Ap roved as to Fonn:
1 it ctor of Engineering Date G ra ounsel Date
Accepted by:
WAGOINSTRUCTION COMPANY
Contractor Date
MID=YEAR REPORT
December 31 , 199
0%Sl FtICT$ OF Oy9y
F
2 i
O ()
U D
A9o�Cn'Y�HE ENV�PCN���
-County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California
Table of Contents
Section 1 - Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I
Financial Report-
Section 2 -Joint Operating &Working Capital Budget Review
Chart of Joint Operating Costs Per Million Gallons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
s Charts on the Gallonage Charge by Department . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Divisional Contributions to Gallonage Charge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Summary of Expenses by Major Category . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Summary of Expenses by Line Item . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Summary of Revenues by Line Item . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Comparison of Expenses by Department . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Chart of Total Flows-Year-To-Date . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Chart of Staffing Trends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Section 3 - Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Review
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Graphs by Type and Funding Source . . . . . . . . 1
Summary of Joint Works Construction Requirement- Current Year . . . . . . . . . . 2
Summary of Joint Works Construction Requirement- Project Life . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Section 4 - Budget Review by District
Summary Budget Reviews- All Districts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
District No. 1 Budget Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
District No. 2 Budget Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
.• District No. 3 Budget Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
District No. 5 Budget Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
District No. 6 Budget Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
District No. 7 Budget Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
District No. 11 Budget Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
District No. 13 Budget Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
District No. 14 Budget Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
r Section 5 - Self-Insurance Funds Budget Reviews
Medical Fund Budget Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Public Liability Fund Budget Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Workers' Compensation Budget Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Operational Report-
Section 6 -Activity Trends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
.e Section 7 - Project Tracking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
�II
This page was intentionally left blank ICJ
4J
I�I
IUII
(W
II4.II1
IW
u
i
u
SECTION 1 .
OVERVIEW
J
V
11
u
J
; i
u
U
J
Overview
Mid-Year Report -
December 31, 1996
In the following sections are a compilation of reports that have in the past been
presented separately to various committees and boards. This comprehensive report
represents the Districts' first attempt to consolidate this information into one report that
' provides both the financial and operational accomplishments of the Districts' through
the quarter ending December 31, 1995. The intent of this report is to provide the
Directors, staff, and the general public with a comprehensive overview of the financial
condition of the Districts, report on the status of all capital projects in progress, and
outline the status of major projects and departmental activity trends. In the future, It is
the goal of staff to prepare and distribute this report at the end of each quarter.
A summary of the sections contained within this report is provided below.
Joint Operating & Working Capital Budget Review: At the mid-year point, 44.25
percent or $24,060,000 of the 1995-96 net joint operating budget of$54,380,000 has
been expended. Although net costs have increased 3.98 percent in comparison with
the same period last year, the Districts' are still only at 48.26 percent of the target goal
of$49,860,000.
The total cost per million gallons (mg) rose to $555.87 from the prior quarter of$508,98,
but is still $71.43 and $43.13 below the approved budget and target goals of$627.30
and $599.00, respectively, while the percentage change in flows decreased less than 1
percent.
Some of the factors contributing to the $46.89 cost per mg increase over the first
quarter include:
• Environmental Monitoring increased 40.17 percent, or $17.14 cost per mg
over the first quarter. This majority of this increase is primarily attributable
to the timing of payments made for ocean monitoring since out of the $1.3
million costs incurred to date, only $268,000 was recognized in the first
quarter. Although total environmental monitoring costs are $78,000 less
than last year at this time, this line item is currently at 55.51 percent of the
total budget and will have to be carefully monitored over the remainder of
the year.
• Although Repair Materials increased 22.99 percent, or $9.81 cost per mg
over the first quarter, this line item is still at 49.63 percent of budget at mid-
year. Staff will be challenged to keep this line item within the total
$3,375,900 budget since an additional $500,000 of material relating to plant
Section 1 - Page 1
Mid-Year Report L
_ L
automation computer maintenance has now been identified that had not
previously been considered during the preparation of the budget.
• Research increased 15.77 percent, or$6.73 cost per mg over the first
quarter. The majority of this increase is related to the increase in payments
made to Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Authority
(SCCWRPA). Although, the Research line item is currently at 69.28
percent of total budget, staff believes that the costs booked-to-date reflect a
greater portion of the total annual cost and that the year end total cost will
approximate the budget of$565,000.
u
Other significant Joint Operating results as of December 31, 1995:
• Salaries and Wages- Although total salary and wages are only at 45.49 V
percent of budget at mid-year, an additional 41 staff members were added
during the first two quarters that will contribute to the total compensation i
paid out in the second half of the year. v
• Retirement- At the mid-year point, retirement was slightly higher than
salaries and wages at 48.80 percent. This higher percentage is reflective of
$208,000 paid out for early retirement as well as the additional amounts
paid for the third and final year payment for the rate increase resulting from
the change in the Orange County Retirement Systems actuarial W
assumptions.
• Insurance- The Insurance line item was at $727,414, or 58.19 percent of
budget, at mid-year. This overage is primarily due to the fact that the final
insurance quotes were received after the budget was adopted. Staff is ,6
examining ways insurance costs can be reduced in 1996-97, including the
possibility of obtaining excess insurance for general liability.
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Review: At December 31, 1995, total Capital Outlay
Revolving Fund expenditures totaled $8,287,008, or 24.72 percent of budget. Total
projected capital expenditures for 1995-96 has been revised from $33.5 million to $21
million due to the delay of several major projects such as the:
-Primary Treatment Expansion of 72 mgd at Plant No. 1
-Primary Clarifier Rehabilitafion at Plant No. 1
-Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2
-Fire Protection and Water Systems Modifications at Plant No. 2
-Chemical and Plant Water Modifications at Plant No. 2
-Surge Tower Replacement at Plant No. 2.
In addition, the new Warehouse Building at Plant No. 2 has been cancelled and the old
Section 1 - Page 2
Overview
Warehouse Building at Plant No. 2 will be remodeled instead.
.. Budget Review by Districts: At mid-year, revenues of all Districts totaled
$61,053,801, or 47.34 percent of budget. None of the $9,100,000 budgeted IRWD
Fees have yet to be received due to the recently concluded negotiations on future
contribution requirements. Likewise, only $5,883, or 0.91 percent of the Sale of
Capacity Rights have been received because the majority of this revenue source is due
in April of 1996 from the Santa Ana Watershed Protection Authority. However, Interest
& Miscellaneous Receipts are at 73.90 percent of budget, or$11,675,734 because of
both larger available cash balances and higher interest rate yields than was anticipated
in the 1995-96 budget.
Conversely, expenses and outlays of all Districts totaled $60,481,160, or 42% of budget
® at December 31, 1995 with no major deviations.
Self-Insurance Funds Budget Reviews: The Districts' are self-insured for General
e Liability, Workers' Compensation and Employee Dental Insurance and provide separate
fund accounting for the revenue and expenses incurred in managing these liability
claims. The revenues to these funds represent individual District contributions based
on each District's share of Joint Works Operating Costs (sewage flows). Expenses to
these funds include actual claims paid, claims administration, and excess loss policies.
The Self-Insurance Fund revenues totaled $449,611, or 43.11 percent of budget at
December 31 while total expense were $385,424, or 37.94 percent of budget.
Operational Review: The Operational Review section of this report pertains to the
status of Activity Trends and Project Tracking as of December 31, 1995.
Activity Trends provides a comparison of current activity trends as compared to budget.
Provided within this section are the key workload indicators of each Division that are
constantly compared with pre-determined benchmarks and re-evaluated over time.
Also included is an explanation of major variances or changes in the data.
Project Tracking summarizes all major divisional projects which were included in the
1995-96 budget. This section identifies each major project and indicates the title,
division responsible, the status of the project, and the start and end dates. The status
of all projects is also provided in chart form and includes the following project
descriptions:
-Ahead -On Track -Done -Behind
-Not Started -On Hold -Cancelled
Section 1 - Page 3
L
L
L
I
u
u
L
L
I .
6w
V
This page was intentionally left blank
L
L
L
I
t!
V
L
V
L
Sa Von 1-Pope 4
L
r
r
r
r
u
SECTION 2.
r
JOINT OPERATING & WORKING CAPITAL BUDGET REVIEW
r
r
u
r
r
r
u
r
r
u
r
J.O. & W.C. Budget Review
Joint Operating Costs Per Million Gallons
f, For The Six Months Ended 12131/95
r �
4I
r �pp ------------------.________________._________________.________________ Te�9et-599
r
ktwyw
r Adml-M
r
lEOD _________________r________________ _____________._________________
r
m $450
1991-92 1992-93 1993.94 19" 19"
t 12131 Cost/mg t6130 Cost/mg
Section 2 -Page 1
i �
Mid-Year Report
_ w
Gallonage Charges by Department
For The Six Months Ended 12131195
E300.00
uso.00
V
I �
o= E200.00 L
E1MM
8
E1ao.oa
c V
E50Dm
W
Eo.00 i i i i— i i a
Actual AcdM AdW Actual AWeI Budget Target 95-96 Tid
199o-91 1991-92 IMM43 199390 196495 1995-96 1995.96
tTOW MaWMteace tTOW OMakm --.TOW Taclr 9eMOes
V
Wm ____________________ __________ __________ ____________________ _
I '
0 ------------------- ---------- --------- ----- ~------------------- -
$ oo ------------------- ---------- --------- --- ---- --------- 4
$30 ------------------- ---------- ------ ------------------- ---------
SuaBo -- ---------- --------- ------- -•-------- ------ --- L
�+ ----- ---------- ---------- --- - --------
L
+ -------------------- ----------
I
maD 6r
AraW Apual Actual ACtaal Actual Budget Target 9MVU
1990-91 1991-92 1992-93 199391 199445 199646 199596
— —Total Management — Total Mwnan Resources — —IrAel Finance tTata11Monnabon SwIrech tTaud Engarae" u
Inl
Seaton 2-Page 2
L
J. O. & W. C. Budget Review
Divisional Contributions to Gallonage Charge
For The Six Months Ended 12131/95 -
199b91 1991-92 1992-93 1993.94 19B4-95 1995-96 1995.96 1995-96
c Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Budget Target Yr to Data
Annual Flow In Million Gallons 08,048.38 82,936.n 64.99962 64]21.SO 88,489.60 seem 61 86.688.61 43.28461
2150 General Mana9ar 1202. 9.W 845 876 15" 8.91 833 11.10
e 2150 BoarO SeaeMry 0.34 212 a 77 0.63 a." 1.66 1.46 1.32
2170 McNgemaM SuppoR 1.0 3.70 2.69 283 247 0.63 0.43 1.05
2190 Communi®Wna Too 104 4a9
Total MBnegement 13M M96 11.90 10A2 19.07 Ism 1736 18.16
2100 Penannel&SIXVRy 5.48 13.25 a.W a.W 11V8 - - -
2510 HRAdmir3bot n - - - - - 3.45 3.45 4,49
25W HR&Too.no - - - - - ow 526 418
m 2530 So"B Emery Reeparue 7 05 6,51 6A5
Total Humen ltmour am 13M B.n 1199 11.78 16A2 1630 14M
U10 011of Finance 7.57 to.W 13,79 16.0 17.07 1787 1aW 21.10
m 2220 Aomuncng 5.50 7.83 6.57 6.59 9.24 1203 11.35 11.37
22W Pulotarang&VFdreluxsln8 5.39 see 6,26 6.01 6.19 an all I'M
Total Pool. IBM 25.D 2&81 29,45 32A8 28.67 =7 4017
® 2240 InbnmBpn SeMces 6.20 10.13 11,79 13.W 14,15 - - -
N1O Indo Teon Adromfin Ston - - - - - 3,07 107 3.04
242S H on SuppoR - - - - - 7.42 OV 6.98
24M SMMe.S,,1 741 am 1929
e ToalI IMerme9on ServRech 629 10.13 11.79 13.60 14.15 17.00 15.72 2992
3310 Director o10&M 1105 9,25 9.56 9,07 1224
Total DI,W 0&M 1108 BM am 9.n tz24
d 3310 Oirer4r of MalnlerlMxe - - - - 3.06 zoo 4.93
33M Mtoo SdonkrIing - - - - - 5.TJ 5.36 4.95
33W pond Mire 34.10 Sam 4221 3802 36.14 3TV 37.28 36.47
3340 Collect. 4.08 7.n 3,52 3.55 2,52 3.95 304 5,46
s 3350 Mechem®I Woo 55.40 59.80 Sam Sam 6710 63.64 WASS
3380 EI6croa1 1394 17.79 17.68 20,96 20,98 am am 17M
W70 Ilu4umenMBon 14.88 loll 22.51 vm 29.17 N.32 am 25.09
e Total Manoterunce 117b7 t]929 146.71 148A9 1Q.18 17" 1117.13 14ti.63
N10 lir of Operations - - - - - 14.32 13.82 Ia8
]3AIW Plan Opera50ns 10.42 182.7E 1Bzn 185.02 1117.98 N4.83 256.B6 212,01
ex Total Opera80ns lum 18z78 192n 18502 WAS M.15 MIS MW
3610 Dire Teo, v s 3.59 392 4.13 288 2.10 9.01 C55 L75
3520 Compeeoce 29.58 34.46 31.8E W.82 40.30 -
Z530 Cons.Reol.Reuse 61.87 14.98 71.35 B8.28 MI03 _
m 3540 Air BualBy - 509 5.0 8.30 651 - - -
35W Soon. Innrel Mg" - W.n 5528 a.W
35W Laboratory 21.78 33.13 So'" 44.00 no 41.32 40.36 36.72
ry 35W Source Con" 9.01 1482 0,17 11.75 949 8.93 am am
Total Teeh 9ard. 115.83 Isola 16926 166.11 10.16 11892 11097 IM75
3710 D1rof Ergr 145 4.54 0,72 055 On 1.45 1.0 4.02
3720 Planar,,Des18n(DeopC 9S967 501 789 2.84 118 3,16 2.81 1.10 BA
37M Enalore,Planning - - - - 0.63 - 1.71
Via Ivtr 60oneob 197 - - - -
woo Gong Mprn 5,59 6So 2.68 3.51 304 4,17 3,43 3.91
r Total ErglneeRng 1104 2116 824 5.92 7.10 9.05 5.6Z 18.12
Total Espe. MTAO 582.49 572.83 678.74 676.73 871.14 84z96 01.70
Leas R.nues (21,91) (43,03) (N.51) (42,93) (52.54) (43.64) (43.64) (4$.02)
Net JO Expe. 425.19 81B." &18.31 Mot 523AS 6n00 599.13 Smarr
Section 2-Page 3
1�
Mid-Year Report
w
Summary of Expenses by Major Category -
For The Six Months Ended 12/31/95
V
Exp. Exp. Incr. Incr. Percent
Budget Thru Thru (Deer.) (Deer.) Budget Remaining )
1995-96 12/31/95 12731/94 $ % Relized Budget W
Net Salaries,Wages&Benefits 28,667,000 13,026,940 12,623,391 403,649 3.20% 45.44% 16,640,060 1 '
V
Odor Control B Chemical Coagulants 5.363,500 1.812,837 1,951,573 (138,736) -7.11% 33.80% 3,55D.663
Contractual Services 7,269.500 3.531,591 3,404,082 127,509 3.75% 48.58% 3,737,909
Professional Services 1,512,600 660,649 743,233 (82,594) -11.11% 43.68% 851,951
I •
Equipment Charges 235,700 93,687 111,089 (17402) -15.66% 39.75% 142.013 6d
Repair 8 Maint.,Materials&Services 4,209,900 2,082,567 1,779,561 303,0D6 17.03% 49.47% 2,127,333 1
i.l
Research 8 Mondonng 3.095,000 1.760,686 1,641,620 118.966 7.25% 56.88% 1,334.414
Utilities 3,375,500 1,166,349 1,314,321 (147,972) -11.26% 34.55% 2,209,151
Other Materials,Supplies
8 Outside Services 4,451,300 1,908,945 1,882,063 26,882 1.43% 42.899h 2,542,355
V
Total Joint Operating Expenses 58,180,000 26,044,161 25,450.933 593,218 2.33% 44.76% 32,135,84E
Revenues 8 Offsets (3,800,000) (1,983,142) (2,310,818) 327,374 -14.17% 52.20% (1,818,558)
Net Joint Operating Expense 54,380,000 24,060.709 23,140,117 920.592 3.98% 44,25% 30,319,291 i
Gallonage Flow(MG) 86.688.61 43,284.61 43.927.97 (643) -1.46% 49.93% 43,404 Ir
Gallonage Flow(MGD) 236.85 235.24 238.74 (3.50) -1.46% 4rJ
Gallonage Charge($'s/MG) 627.30 555.87 526.77 29.10 5.52%
Lr
I '
UJ
V
id
V
Section 2-Page 4
V
F J. O. & W. C. Budget Review
Summary of Expenses by Line Item
For The Six Months Ended 12/31/95
o i
EXP EXP EXP INCR INCR
BUDGET THRU THRU REMAINING THRU (DECR) (DECR)
Description 1995-96 12131195 12/31/95 BUDGET 12131194 $ %
Salaries.Wages 8 Benefits
Salaries 8 Wages 32,283,000 14.684.709 45.49 17,598,291 14,228,830 455,879 3.20
Employee Benefits:
Retirement 3.077.000 1,501,482 48.80 1,575,518 1,054.920 446,562 42.33
Workers Comp 225,000 103,848 46.15 121.154 112,500 (8,654) (7.69)
Unemployment Ins 75,000 12.944 17.26 62.056 17,746 (4,1102) (27.06)
Group Insurance 4,207,000 1.798,939 42.76 2.408,061 1,810.973 (12.034) (0.86)
Uniform Rental 100.000 28,625 28.83 71,175 35.015 (6.19D) (17.68)
Total Benefits 7,684,D00 3,446,036 44.85 4,237,964 3.031,154 414,882 13.69
Salaries,Wages,8 Benefits 39,967,000 18,130,745 45.36 21,836,255 17.259.984 870,761 5.04
'a W.O.Salaries 8 Ben.Alloc.
Direct Charges-Cori (6,875,000) (2,792,058) 40.61 (4,082,942) (2,956,878) 164.820 (5.57)
Cost AIIoc-Corl/Dist (4,425,000) (2,311,747) 52.24 (2,113,253) (1,679.715) (632,032) 37.63
W.O.Salaries&Benefits (11,300,000) (5,103,805) 45.17 (6,196.195) (4,638,593) (467,212) 10.08
Net J.O. Payroll 28,667,000 13,026,940 45.44 15,640.060 12.623,391 403,549 320
Mad, Supply,8 Services
Gasoline, Diesel 8 Oil 175,000 67.239 38.42 107,781 96,273 (29,034) (30.16)
Insurance 1,250,000 727,414 58.19 522,586 674,111 53,303 7.91
Memberships 58,000 28,950 49.91 29.050 40.823 (11,873) (29.08)
Office Exp-Supplies 203.100 60,457 20.77 142.643 58,278 2.179 3.74
Office Automation 157.500 95,157 61.05 61,343 40,188 55,969 139.27
Other 102.300 49,859 46.74 52,441 41.808 8,051 19.26
Operating Supplies
e Odor Control 2,103,5D0 665,129 31.62 1,438.371 620.373 44,756 721
Sulfide Control 1.715,000 610.626 35.61 1,104,374 693,360 (82,734) (11.93)
Chemical Coagulants 1.545,000 537,082 34.76 1,007.918 637,840 (100.755) (16.80)
Lab Chemicals 8 Supplies 509,000 156,927 30.83 352,073 200.047 (43.120) (21.55)
Tools 125,400 56,158 44.78 69242 43,376 12,782 29.47
Solv, Paints,8 Jan. Supplies 146,000 58,394 38.63 89,606 60.923 (4,529) (7.43)
Other Operating Supplies 207,500 112,165 54.08 95,335 98.466 13.699 13.91
Contractual Services
Groundskeeping 8 Janitorial 213,000 50,249 23.59 162,751 61,760 (11,511) (18.04)
Outside Lab Services 150,000 24,753 16.50 125,247 29.625 (4,872) (16.45)
Solids Removal 5,425,000 2,855.393 52.63 2,669,607 2,783,412 71.981 2.59
Other Waste Disposal 140,000 15,895 11.35 124,105 27.657 (11,762) (42.63)
.. Oxygen Plant Oper 510,D00 235.338 46A4 274.662 224.344 10,994 4.90
Other 831.500 349,963 42.09 481,537 277,264 72,679 26.21
Section 2 -Page 6
L
Mid-Year Report
Summary of Expenses by Line Item r'l
For The Six Months Ended 12/31/95
% Ld
EXP EXP EXP INCR INCR
BUDGET THRU THRU REMAINING THRU (DECR) (DECR)
DESCRIPTION 191l 12131195 12/31195 BUDGET 12131184 S %
Professional Services
Legal 600.000 340,854 56.81 269,146 285.484 55,370 19.40
Audit&Accounting 70.000 27,618 39.45 42,382 65,853 (39,235) (58.69)
Engineering 289.000 70,322 24.33 218,678 71,337 (1,015) (1.42) Lf
Other 553,600 221,855 40.07 331,745 319,569 (97.704) (30.57)
Printing&Publication
Repro-ln-House 219,1D0 116,298 53.08 102,802 112,973 3.325 2.94
Prin8ng.Outsioe 60,500 14,353 23.72 46,147 9,548 4,805 50.32
Photo Processing 32,700 13,588 41.49 19,132 11,707 1,861 15.90
Notices&Ads 29,6W 20234 68.59 9,268 14,892 5,342 35.87
Rents&Lasses V
Outside Equip Rental 109,000 46,804 42.94 62,196 44,683 2,121 4.75
District Equip Rental 126,700 46,883 37.00 79,817 66,406 (19,523) (29.40) L
Repairs&Maintenance -
Materials 3,375,900 1,675,374 49.63 1,700,526 1,498,373 177,001 11.81
Contracts 834,000 407,193 48.82 426,807 281,188 126.005 44.81
Research&Monitoring 4J
Enviro Monitoring 2,375,000 1,318,477 55.51 1,056,523 1.396,880 (78.403) (5.61)
Air Quality Monitoring 155,000 50,650 32.68 104,350 75,000 (24,350) (32.47)
Research 565,000 391,459 6928 173,541 169,740 221.719 130.62 V
Travel&Meetings 134,0D0 76,970 57.44 57,030 1OZ444 (25.474) (24.87)
Training 513,500 103,389 20.13 410,111 - 103.389 10D.00
Uncollectable Accounts 15,000 171 1.14 14,829 - 171 1DD.00
Utilities W
Diesel For Generators 25,000 0.00 25,000 5,964 (5,964) (100.00)
Power 1.075,000 405,466 37.72 689,534 395,047 10419 2.64
Natural Gas 1,400,000 421,781 30.13 978,219 494.962 (73:181) (14.79) Lo
Telephone 125.500 63.022 50.22 62,478 65,541 (2,619) (3.84)
Water 750,000 276.080 36.81 473,920 352.807 (76.727) (21.75) .i
Other Expenses
w
Freight 79,70D 25,518 32.02 54,182 28,536 (3,018) (10.58)
General&Safety 539.000 164.185 30.46 374.815 204,100 (39,915) (19.5M
Aqmd Operating Fees 250,OO1) 89.129 35.65 160,871 64,901 24,228 37.33 I ,
Prior Years Expense 20,000 - 0.00 20,000 162,360 (162,36D) 0.OD Iwl
Other Non-Opel Expense 94,500 29,855 31.59 64,645 39,888 (10,033) (25.16)
Net J.O.-Matis,Supp.&Sam. 29,983,000 13,173,656 43.94 16,809,344 13,051,121 122,535 0.94 L
Cost AIIoc-Corf&Other (470.000) (156.445) 33.29 (313,555) (223.579) 67.134 (30.03)
Net I.O:Maas,Supp, &Sam. 29,513.000 13,017,211 44.11 16,495,789 12,927,542 189,669 1.46
i
Total J.0. Requirements 58,180,000 26,044,151 44.76 32,135,849 25,450,933 593,218 2.33 wd
Less:: Revenue (3,810,000) (2,023.339) 53.11 (1,786,661) (2,320,884) 297.545 (12.82)
Cost Allocation
- CORF, Dists, &Other 10,000 39,897 398.97 (29.897) 10,068 29,829 29528 y j
Net Revenue (3,800,000) (1,983,442) 52.20 (1,816.558) (2,310,816) 327.374 (14.17)
Net J.O. Expenditures 54,380,000 24,060,709 44.25 30,319,291 23.M,117 92D,592 3.98
Section 2-Page 6
J. O. & W. C. Budget Review
Summary of Revenues by Line Item
For The Six Months Ended 12/31/95
.,. REV %REV REV INCR INCR
BUDGET THRU THRU REMAINING THRU (DECR) (DECK)
DESCRIPTION 1995416 12131195 12131195 BUDGET 12/31194 $ %
INTER DIST SEWER USE 1.450,000 811,692 55.98 638,308 799,706 11,986 1.50
- WASTEHAULER 500,000 154,748 30.95 345,252 239,400 (84,652) (35.36)
IRWD SLUDGE DISPOSAL 650,000 494,615 76.09 155.385 394,123 100,492 25.50
WASTE HAULER PENALTIES - - 0.00 - 0 (0) 0.00
-- SCRAP SALES 10,000 13,730 137.30 (3,730) 42,976 (29.246) (68.06)
OTHER SALES 5,000 808 16.16 4.192 653 155 23.75
BIOSOLIDS REUSE 10,000 - 0.00 10,000 6,722 (6,722) (100.00)
RENTS&LEASES 70,D00 73,201 104.57 (3,201) 1,250 71,951 100.00
INVESTMENTINTEREST - - 0.00 - - - 0.00
ar CONTRIBUTION IN AID - - 0.00 - - - 0.00
GENERAL NON-OPERATING 100,000 98.403 98.40 1,597 52.414 45,989 87.74
VEHICLE&EQUIP 200,000 92,379 46.19 107,621 $1.608 10,771 13.20
b MAILING FEE S,ODO 20 0.40 4,980 30 (10) (33.33)
SAMPLING CHARGES 250,D00 119,063 47.63 130,937 127,932 (81869) (6.93)
- - PRIOR YEAR INCOME 50,000 - 0.00 50,000 375,953 (375,953) (100.00)
0
POWER SALES 500,000 164,679 32.94 335,321 198.117 (33,438) (16.88)
TOTALJO REVENUES 3,800.000 2,023,339 53.25 1,776,661 2,320.884 (297,545) (12.82)
r
ti
es1
b.'
d
Section 2-Page 7
L
Mid-Year Report
Comparisons of Expenses by Department
For The Six Months Ended 12/31/95
199
1993-94 1994-95 1994-95 Adopted Year too Date Budget% 4
Deparbnent and Division Actual Budget Actual Budget 12131/95 Realized
General Managers Department
Executive Management 569,751 1,D09,300 1.410,640 763,700 480,595 62.93% yrj
Board Secretary 70,207 208.000 58,660 143,600 57,178 39.82%
Management Support - - - 54,700 45,432 83.06%
Communications 238,956 441,600 218,598 676.400 202,873 29.99%
Total 878,924 1,658,900 1,687,798 1.1338,400 786,678 47.98%
Human Resources Department
Human Resources Administration 758,055 1,126.500 1,042.149 299,000 194175 64.94%
Human Resources 8 Training - - - 512,800 185:432 36.16%
Safety 8 Emergency Response 611.200 235,754 38.57%
Total 758,055 1,126.500 1,042,149 1,423,000 615,361 43.24%
Finance Department 4
Finance Administration 1.420,950 1,413.800 1,510,739 1,549,000 913,116 68.95%
Accounting 555,449 815,600 817,506 1.042,800 492,085 47.19%
Purchasing 8 Warehousing 506,788 647,400 546,640 760,500 342,215 45.00%
Total 2,483,187 2,876,8D0 2,874,885 3.352,300 1,747,416 52.13%
Information Technology Department
Info Tech Administration 1,146,921 1,699,300 1,251jill 266,100 131,622 49.46%
Hardware Support - - - 643,250 302,307 47.00%
Software 8 Plant Automation Support 642,250 860,954 134.05%
Total 1.146,921 1,699.300 1,251.701 1,551,600 1,294.884 83.45%
Maintenance Department
Maintenance Administration 932,102 1,107,100 1,083,020 265,000 212,060 80.02%
Maintenance Scheduling - - - 496,400 214,247 43.16%
Plant Maintenance 3.290,595 3,458,100 3,197,821 3,261,300 1,578,665 48.41% 'I
Collection Facilities Maintenance 299,426 365.900 249,469 342,300 236,224 69.01% Ly
Mechanical Maintenance 4.898,622 5.574.700 5.192,640 5,816.600 2,202,360 37.86%
Electrical Maintenance 1.767,675 1,902,300 1,856,601 1,964,000 774,128 39.42%
Instrumentation Maintenance 2,346,636 2,713,800 2,581,127 2,975,100 1,086,045 36.50%
Total 13.435.056 15,121.900 14.160.678 15.120,700 6,303.729 41.69% 64
Operations Department l
Operations Administration - - - 1,241,700 628621 50.63% 1
Plant Operations 15,601.211 15,840.800 14,862,879 22,957,600 9,176:778 39.97%
Total 15,601,211 15,840,800 14.862,879 24,199,300 9,605,399 40.52%
Technical Services Department
Technical Services Administration 243,052 266,200 193,053 833,100 292,372 35.09%
Environmental Management 9,057,047 10,533,300 10,163,150 4.921,400 2,592,949 52.89%
Environmental Sciences Lab 3.715,233 3,471,950 3.241.725 3,581,6D0 1,546,131 43.17% 1
Source Control 991,029 276,750 839.942 773,700 276,613 35.62% ✓j
Total 14,006.361 14,538,200 14,437,870 10,109,8D0 4,707,065 46.56%
Engineering Department
Engineering Administration 46,212 56,000 78,229 125.400 173,900 138.68% yj
Design Engineering 148,366 221,000 281,346 243,800 367,482 150.73%
Engineering Planning - - - 54,20D 73,811 136.18%
Construction Management 296,125 102,6D0 266,966 361,50D 169,026 46.76%
Total 490,703 379,600 628,531 784,900 794.218 99.91% L
Less Joint Operating Revenues (3.620,154) (3,700,000) (4,649,515) (3,800,000) _ (1,983,442) 52.20%
Net Joint Operating Expenses 45,180,264 49,542,OOD 46.296.976 54,380.000 24,D60,709 44.25%
Section 2-Page 8
u
J.O. & W.C. Budget Review
Total Flows - Year-To-Date
® For The Six Months Ended 12/31195
45.000
4a.000 -----------------`-------------- --------- ---- ---
49.000 - -- - --- - -- -- — -------------- ------ ---------" ----
0
A
ra
� O
42,000 _ _ __ _________ __.__ ___________._________________
® 41.000 _ _____________ ________________-____
4"0a
Ds0e1 DIDi2 D0043 Dace4 0ee45
Sk Months Ended
Section 2-Pape 9
Mid-Year Report u
V
Staffing Trends
For The Six Months Ended 12131/95
I
710
690
i
670 --------------------
m
O
W y
0
E630 _____________________________________4__________________4_ t_________________
L
L
Ir
590
r L
570
6130/92 6rM3 N.1m 613M 12131M
iw
t Authorized --m-AchW
L
M�
u
i
L
id
w
ftWon Y-Pays 10
j .
L.f
LI SECTION 3.
Lj CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND REVIEW
i.l
u
U
iJ
J
U
J
u
CORF Review
F Capital Improvement Program
For The Six Months Ended 12131195
'9 Plant 1
$3,513,DOD Plan12
43% $1.632.000
19%
Wake,itadamstion
$104.00D
1%
const.in Progress
W'DOD
Interplant 6 Joint FacilitiesEquipment
70,000
$933,000 Special Projo= $2,0
11% &studies 25%
$91,000
1%
Total Capital Improvement Expenditures -$8,287,000
District No.2 Distnd No. 3
414S,,,Ind
00 $2,524,000
® 30 d6%
Mani No, 1
$810.D00
9.83.°6District No.5
- - $298,000
3.61%
D No.6
$523,000 Distnd No. 53 District No 11 District No. 7 5394,000
6.31% $80,000 $519,000 $687,000 4.69%
`g 0.96
6.32% 8.39%
Total Capital Improvement Funding - $8,287,000
Section 3-Page 1
Mid-Year Report L
1
Summary of Joint Works Construction Requirement - Current Year W
For The Six Months Ended 12/31/95
1995-96 6t30196 b
1995.96 Actual Remaining Projected
Budget 012131195 Budget Cost
A.Reclamation Plant 1 New and Rebudgeted Major Projects: r.
1. Electrification of Pump Drives, P1-36-1 50,000 408,825 (358,825) 504,846
2. Secondary Treatment Expansion to 80 MGD, P1-36-2 6,335,000 2,302,653 4,032,347 9,262,695
Value Engineering for Secondary Treatment, Pt-36-2 165,000 4,821 160,179 -
3. Primary Treatment 72 MGD Expansion, P1-37 164,626 1,832 162,794 261,735
Compressed Natural Gas Refueling Station, P1-51 835,374 3,178 832,196 -
4. Security& Landscaping, P1-38-1 10,000 59,909 (49,909) 94,617
5. Misc. Mods. Priority Elements P1-38-2 10.000 208,920 (198,920) 280,780 y
6. Misc. Modifications to Plant 1, Pt-384 50,000 268,967 (218,967) 477,724
7. Fire Protection, Signs and Water Sys Mods., Pt-38-5 900,000 17,345 882,655 594,815
8. Electl. Facility Modifrts&Safety Upgrades,P1-40-1 - 2,450 (2,450) 24,907 W
9. Fac Modifns &Safety Upgrades, P140-2 500,000 17,565 482,435 40,926
10. Prim Clarifiers 3A&5 Rehab. P141 1,000,000 45,744 954,256 431,379 (
11. Seimic Retrofit of Non-Structure Systems, PI-43 - - - _ 16,000
12. Seismic Retrofit Structual Items, P144-1,2,3 100,000 31,675 68,325 100,179
13. Chemical and Wastehauler Facility Modifns, P146-2,3 - 7,980 (7,980) 107,980
14. 12KV Distribution System for Support Facilities, P147 400,000 11,378 388,622 38,665
1d
15. Misc Architectural&Treatment Pit Imprvmts, P148 396,938 10.363 386,575 20,155
Information Technologies Trailer Conplex, P148-1 3,082 3,062 - -
23. Miscellaneous Special Projects Plnt 1, P149 50,000 - 50,000 -
24. Misc. Job Plan Projects (See Schedule C) 500,000 105,792 394,208 190,541 6d
Sub-Total -Reclamation Plant 1 11,470,000 3,512,469 7,957,541 12,447,844
B.Plant 2 New and Rebudgeted Major Projects: )
1. Support Facilities and Site Improvements Ir'r
a. Operations Building, P2-23-5-1 350,000 70,322 279,678 353,357
b.Warehouse Building, P2-35-2 1,400,000 25.865 1,374135 -
c. Maintenance Building , P2-35-3 1,400.000 43.130 1,356:870 534.758
e. Construction Management Office, M-044(P2-354) 250.000 35,313 214,687 264,795
2. Rehab 7 Digesters, P2-39-1,2,3 250,000 29,372 220,628 114,545
3. Primary Treatment 24 MGD Expansion, P241 - 787 (787) - v
4. Secondary Treatment Expansion, P242-2 1.400,000 957.468 442.532 1.347,531
5. Priority Misc. Mod. , P243-1 50,000 45,834 4,166 228,069
6. Misc. Modifications , P243-3 10,000 75,3T7 (65377) 108,733 I
7. Plant 2 Influent Diversion 200,000 - 200:000 90,000 V
8. Fire Protection, Signs&Water Sys Modifns, P246 1,900,000 19,402 1.880.598 591.707
9. Electl Fac Modifns&Safety Upgrades, P247-1 - 6,419 (6,419) 28,969 1
10. Fac Modifns&Safety Upgrades, P247-2 600,000 27,896 472104 53.875 jW
11. Primary Clarifier Rehab. P248 500,000 32,845 467:165 256,875
12.Seimic Retrofit of Non-Structure Systems, P2-50 - 3,520 (3,520) 321,000
13. Seismic Retrofit, Structural Items P2-53-2,3,4,5,6 50,000 58,464 (8,464) 133,000 !
14. Chemical and Plant Water Modifns, P2-55 1,400,000 33,274 1,366,726 378,528 V
15. Misc Seismic Modifns&Flare Improvements, P2-56 250,000 1,403 248.597 3,403
16. Miscellaneous Projects Special Projects Plant 2 50,000 - 50,000 - I
20. Reclaimed Water System Pint. 2 75,000 - 75,000 12,000 y
21. Misc. Job Plan Projects (See Schedule D) 500,000 65,529 434,471 176,412
Sub-Total-Treatment Plant 10,535,000 1,532,220 9,002,780 4,997,657 I
U
Section 3- Page 2
L
CORF Review
® Summary of Joint Works Construction Requirement - Current Year -
For The Six Months Ended 12/31/95
1995-96 6130196
1995-96 Actual Remaining Projected
Budget Br 1213'1195 Budget Cost
C.Water Reclamation Regional Expansion 52,086 - 52,088 -
Reclmation Plant No. 1 Water Quality Management Study 153 153 - 163
OCSD/OCWD Regional Water Reclamation Plant Study 47,761 103,683 (65,922) 59,761
Sub-Total -Water Reclamation Regional Expansion 100,000 103,836 (3,836) 59,914
D. Interplant and Joint Facilities
1, Support Facilities and Site Improvements
a. Demolition of Old Lab for Offices, J-11-1 200,000 2.813 197,187 202,000
b. Central Lab Expansion J-17-3 90,233 67 90.166 12,000
Purch &Instl of Racks to Secure Gas Cylinders& Dewar 27,467 1,263 26,204 -
Office Reconfigurated for Enviom Mgmt Area 42,300 - 42,300 -
2. Outfall & Booster Pump Stations
a. Surge Tower Replacement, J-34-1 1.185,000 4,574 1.180,426 262,000
3. Computerized Fac. Records and Dwg. Sys. J-25-1 419,900 76,314 343,586 36,561
New Safety Division Offices,J-41-1 80,100 825 79,275
4. Electi. Power Systems Rehab. Studies J-25-2,3&4 200.000 53,764 146,236 121,171
5. Plants 1&2 Monitor/Control Sys, J-31-1,2,3,4,5 1,736.535 1,050,457 686,078 496,471
SCADA Retrofit Hardware Platform at Phs 1 &2 137,865 137,865 - 49.648
Power Bldg#1 Air Conditioning & Modifn for J-31 25,600 - 25,600 -
6. Standby Power Reliability Modifns, J-33-1,2 1,050,000 166.447 884,563 112.532
8. Biosolids Disposal Projects
b. Land Acquisition - 194,619 (194,619) 14,708
9- District Information Management Network - - - 325,000
- - a. Maint. &Oper Mgmnt Computer System 75,000 - 76,000 -
b. Lab Information Management System Upgrades 16,893 - 16,893 -
c. Financial Information System 600,000 55.706 644,294 -
d. Network System Integration 297,300 1,429 295,871 679
- Network Integration Consulting 42,700 2,436 40,264 -
e. CD-Opficel Data Archiving 50,000 50,000
10. In-Plant Sampling System Modifn 69,740 - 69,740 21,000
Final Sampler System Upgrades 30,260 13,487 16,773 567
11. Improvements to Central Generation 257,800 - 267,800 -
Boiler Chemical Dosing System 2,800 3.489 (689) -
__ Piping Insulation Addition 4,800 332 4,468 -
Steam System Modifn 34,600 - 34,600 -
m 12. Cable Tray Improvements 100,000 - 100.000 -
13. Misc Job Plan Projects (See Schedule E) 500,000 305.336 194,664 177,517
-- Transfer from D. Items 10 a&b Projects Above 133,107 - 133.107 -
Sub-Total -Interplant&Joint 7,410,000 2,070,223 5,339,777 1,831,854
Sub-Total -Major Projects 29,515,000 7,218,738 22,296,262 19,337,169
r
Section 3-Page 3
L
Mid-Year Report
Summary of Joint Works Construction Requirement - Current Year - L
For The Six Months Ended 12/31195
1995-96 6130196 L
1995-96 Actual Remaining Projected
Budget (d 12131/95 Budget Cost
E.Special Projects, Studies& Research
1. Master Planning Issues
a. Pers/Admin. Support Fac @ Pit 1 J-26,J-30 71,984 56 71,928 210,058 L
Districts' Office Space Utilization Study, J-38-1 3,016 3,016 - -
b. Peak Hydraulic Discharge/Outfall Studies 377,793 - 377,793 153.000
Determination of Peak Hydraulic Discharge 22.207 22.207 - - 1
c. Coll, Trtmnt&Disp Fac. Strategic Study 200,000 - 200,000 - 61
d. NPDES Permit Support 100,000 35.351 64.649 273
2. Air Quality Control Program - - - 165,000
a.Toxics and ROG Control: Biotrickling filter R& D 90,000 29,874 60,126 24,850 V
b.Air Emissions: Source Control Feasibility Study/Metal 25,000 - 25,000 -
d. Biofiiter for Pump Stations 25,000 - 25,000 -
e. A.Q. Database Development 25,000 - 25,000
f. Central Gen Parameter Monitoring 75,000 75,000
Sub-Total -Special Projects 1,015,000 90,504 924,496 553,179 '
V
F. Equipment Items 3.000,000 933,214 2.066,786 1,171,178
Sub-Total -Joint Works Capital Requirements 33,530,000 8,242,456 25,287.544 -
N
Construction In Progress Completed at 6/30195 44.552 (44.552)
Total Joint Works Capital Requirements 33,530,000 8,287,008 25,242,992 21,061,526 6r1
L
L
I
V
I
U
I ;
L
u
Section 3 -Page 4
L'
CORF Review
Summary of Joint Works Construction Requirement - Project Life
For The Six Months Ended 12/31/95
d Curren Total
Total 6130195 Year Projected Estimated
Esumated Accumulated Projected coat at Future
Cost Cost Cost 6MI95 Cost
A.Reclamation Plant 1 New and Rebudgeted Major Projects:
1.ElecVlfiation of Pump Drives, P1-3&1 1,700,000 1.066,911 504,846 1,475,736 224.264
2.Secondary Treatment Expansion to 80 MGD,P7-36-2 46.835.000 118.137 9,262.695 2,420,79D 4.414,210
Value Engineering for Secondary Treatment.P1-3&2 165.000 - - 4,821 160,179
3.Primary Treatment 72 MGD Expansion,Pt-37 36,125,000 166,613 261,735 1611,445 37,956,555
Compressed Nalurel Gas Refueling Station,P731 835,374 - - 3,178 832,196
4.security 8 Landscaping,Pt-38-1 1,510,000 1.573,145 94.617 1,633,054 (123,054)
`m 5.Misc.Mods.Priority Elements Pi-38.2 4,810,000 5,007,980 280,780 5,216.900 (406.900)
_ 6.Misc.Modifications to Plant 1,Pt-38.4 2.560,000 1.927.039 477.724 2,196,006 353.994
7.Fire Protection,Signs and Water Sys Mode.,Pt-3&5 3.060,000 463.663 584,815 481,008 2,578.992
B.Elect.Faulfty Measles 8 Safety Upgredes,P140-1 8.625.000 133,378 24,907 135.828 8,469,172
9.Fee Modilns B Safety Upgrades,P140-2 2.025.000 288,370 40,926 305.935 1,719,065
10.Plim Clan8ers 3,485 Rehab. P141 2,350,000 251,454 431,379 297,198 2,052,802
11.Selmic Retrofit of Non Structure Systems,P143 4,250,00D 117,194 16.000 117,194 4,132,81D6
4° 12.Seismic Retrofit Structual Items,P144-1,2,3 4.250,000 922,135 100,179 953,810 3.296,190
13.Chemical and Wastehauler Facility Moddne,P146-2,3 3.020.000 401,018 107,980 408,998 2,611,002
14. 12KV Distribution System for Support Facilities,PI47 2.650.000 141,956 38,565 153,334 2.496,665
15.Misc Arcndedural 8 Tmatment Pit lmprvmis.P148 835,000 107,345 20,155 117,708 717.292
m information Technologies Trailer Conplex,P146-1 400,W) - - 3,062 396,938
16.40 MGD Oxygen Activated Sludge B DAF'S 65,463,000 - - - 65,463,00D
17.Belt Presses(4 Units) 14.300,000 - - - 14,300,WD
1S.Solids Storage(4 Bins) 10.177,000 - - - 10,177,000
19,Digesters: 2 @ 1 10'Diameter 9,100,000 - - 9.100,000
20. 12kv Electrical Power DtsNbutkn 2.477,000 - - - 2.477,WD
21.Emergency Sewage Bypass System 1,922,000 - - - 1,922,00D
22.Remove Trickling Fitters 1 8 3 1,300.000 - - - 1,300,001)
23.Miscellaneous Specal Projects PInL 1, P149 4,385,000 - - - 4,385.000
24.Miac.Job Plan Project/ (See Schedule C) 22,125,000 66.054 190,541 171,946 21,953,154
25.Other Master Plan Projects
a. Headwoncs No. 1 Rebuild,2W3 14,950,0g0 - - 14,950,000
It.Headworks No.2 Impeller/Pump Speed 2016 2.600,000 - - - 2.600,000
c.Remove Trickling Fillers 2 8 4.2007 1.300,000 - - - 1.300,000
&40 Mgd Oxygen Acrd Sludge BDAF,2017 34,000,000 - - - 34,000,000
e. 1 10'8 Digesters,2003 8 2012 1Q2W,000 - - - 18,200,000
rfl f.4 Belt Presses,20D4 10,920,000 - - 10,920,000
g. 12 KV Power Distribution,2001-2012 1,099.000 - - - 1.099,000
h. Standby Power Generation,200562015 4,914.000 - - - 4,91Q000
m t 72 Mga Primary Treatment,200482012 32,500,WD 32,600,000
Sub-Total -Reclamation Plant 1 379,727.374 12.752,392 12,447,841 16,264.851 363,462,523
B.Plant 2 New and Re audgeted Major Projects:
1.Support Facilities and She Improvements
a.Operations Buiking,P2-23-5-1 3.650.000 3.398,576 353,357 3.468.898 81.102
_ b.Warehouse Building,P2-35.2 3.820,000 308,582 - 334.447 3.485.553
c.Maintenance Building,P2-35-3 1,01100,e00 263,064 534,758 306.194 3,693,806
,a d. Phase II Site 8 Security Imp.,P2-35-6 2.475,000 176,309 - 176,309 2298,691
e.Construction Management Office,M-044(P2.3&4) 690.000 277,094 264,795 312.407 377.593
2,Rehab 7 Dgesters,P2-394,2,3 14,225,000 529,657 114,545 559,029 13,665,971
3,Primary Treatment 24 MGD Expansion,P241 14,605,000 4.549 - 5,336 14,499,664
m 4.Secondary Treatment Expansion,P242-2 18,1100,0110 16,277.999 1.347,631 17,235,467 764.533
5.Priority Misc.Moo. ,P243-1 4,850,001) 5.011,628 228,059 5,057,462 (207,462)
- - 6.Misc.Modlfiations,P243-3 2,610.000 2,640,666 108,733 2,716,073 (206,073)
7. Plant 2 Influent Diversion 2.500,000 - 90.000 - 2.5W,000
Section 3-Page 6
1i
Mid-Year Report
Summary of Joint Works Construction Requirement- Project Life
u
For The Six Months Ended 12/31/95
Current Total
Total 6130196 Year Projected Estimated tA�
Estimaled Accumulated Projected Costat Future
Cost cost Cost V30M Cost
B.Plant 2 New and Rebudgeted Major Projects(cons): LI
8.Fire Protection.Signs 8 Water Sys Modi rs,P246 4.615,000 4d0.101 591,707 459.503 4.155,497
9. Elec i Fee MaBrw 8 Safety Upgrades,P247-1 ]45g000 113,362 26,969 119,781 3.330.219
10.Fee Maims B Safety Upgrades,P2.47-2 4.015,000 290,452 53,875 318.348 3.696,652 i
11.Primary Clarifier Rehab. P248 6,800,000 474.753 256,875 507.598 6.292,402 yl'
12.Sound Retrofit of Non-Slructuro Systems,P2-50 4,800,000 165,811 321,000 169,331 4,630,669
13.Seismic Retrofit,Structural Items P2.53.2,3,4,5,6 8,410,000 3,262,714 133,000 3.321,178 5,083,822
14.Chemical and Plant Water Modima,P2-S5 4.200.000 335,527 378.528 3611801 3,831,199 )
15.Mile Seismic Modifns 8 Flare Improvements,P2-56 525,0D0 19,648 3,403 21,051 503949 V
16.Miscellaneous Projects Spectal Projects Plant 2 4,650,000 - - - 4,550,000
17.Solids Storage: 2 Bins 5.200,000 - - - 5.200,000
18.Additional 105 Foot Digester 3.900,000 - - - 3,900,001)
19.Plant Water Pump Station 1.170,000 - - - 1,170,000
20.RaGebned Water System Pint 2 4,820,000 - 12,01D0 - 4,82Q000
21.Misc.Job Plan Projects (See Schedule D) 22=,000 103.950 176,412 169,479 22,080.521
22.Other Master Plan Projects
a.Replace Primary Basins A,B,C,2006 11,700,000 - - - 11.700,000
b.Standby Power Generation,200582015 10,000,000 - - 10,000,000
c.Monitoring and Control System,2005 520,000 520,DD0
Sub-Total-Troatrnent Plant 172,050,000 34,094.472 4.997,557 35,626,692 136423,308 V
C.Water Reclamation Regional Expansion 74.820,000 - - - 74,820,000
Reclamxticn Plant No. 1 Water Quality Mngt.Study 280.000 1.540 153 1,693 271,307
OCSD/OCWD Water Reclamation Plant Study 400,000 148,637 59,761 252,520 147,480
Sub-Total-Water Reclm.Regional Expansion 75,5D0,DD0 150.377 59,914 254.213 75,245,787
D.Interplant and Joint Facilities ; t
1.Support Facilities and Site Improvements L;
a.Demolition of Old Lab for Offices.J-11-1 230.000 27,858 202,000 30.671 199,329
b.Central Lab Expansion J-17-3 840,233 - 12,000 67 840,166
Porch B lnsti of Racks for Gas Cylinders B Dewars 27,467 15,749 - 17.012 10,455
Office Recordguraled for Enviom Mgmt Area 42,300 - - - 42,300 4
c.Demolition or Reuse of Old Conbol Center 245,000 - - - 245,000
d.Demolition of Support Bldg.@Pt2,J-27 190,000 109,504 - 109,504 80.498
2.Oulfall 8 Booster Pump Stations
a.Surge Tower Replacement,J-34-1 6,500,000 768,699 262,000 773.273 5.726,727 L
b.Outfall Reliability 8 Pumping Annex OOBS'C'J-34 31,085,000 - - - 31,086,000
c.Ext 8 Rod 78Yo Deep Water w/l27 Outiall 92,050.000 - - - 92,050,000 -
3.Computerized Fee.Records and Dw9.Sys.J.25-1 4,710,000 2D9,406 36.561 285,720 4,424,280
Transfer to Project Below
New Safety Division Offices,J41-1 80,100 - - 825 79.275
Power
4.Maud.Per Systems Rehab.Stages J-25-2,364 I=,000 14,961 121.171 68,725 1,155,2.75
5.Plants 182 Monflor/Control Sys, J31-1,2,3,4,5 8.824.400 2,127.616 496,471 3,178,073 6,646,327
SCADA Retrofit Hardware Platform at Plls 1 8 2 2,200,000 423,684 49,648 681,549 1,638,451
Power Bldg a 1 Alr Conditioning B Maifn for J-31 26,600 - - 25.600
6.Standby Power Reliability Mod4ns,J33-1,2 14.575,000 445.593 112,532 611,040 13,963,960
nt Trunk )
7.Bushard hderpla Replacement 31,000,000 - - 31,000,000
B.Biosolids Disposal Projects 1�
a.Compost Demonstration Plant 9,000,000 - - - 9,000,000
In.Land Acquisition 22,000,000 - 14,708 194.619 21,B06381
c.Landfill Development Phase I 28,600,DDD - - - 28,600.000
d.Compost Facility 50,000,000 - - - 50,0110,000
e.Biosolids Died.Landfill Phase 112011 15,800,0%) - - - 15,600,000
Section 3 -Page 6
L
CORF Review
Summary of Joint Works Construction Requirement- Project Life
For The Six Months Ended 12/31/95
Current Total
w Total 6130/95 Year Projected Estimated
ESOmated Accumulated Projected Cost at Future
Cost Cost Cost 6130196 Cost
D.Interplant and Joint Facilities(cont)
I,Biosolids Do,Equip Phase I&112001 11,500,000 - - - 11,500,000
9. Elearical Power Distribution, 12W 2,707,000 - - - 2,707,000
9..District Information Management Network - 325.000 -
'd a.Maint 80per Mgmnt Computer System 1,050.CD0 89S593 - 896,593 163.407
b.lab Information Management System Upgrades 505.000 47,773 - 47.773 457,227
Transfer to 0. Item 13(Schedule E)
c.Financial Information System 970.000 209,073 - 264.779 705,221
m d.Network System Integration 920.000 1.786 679 3.215 816.785
Network Integration Consulting 42.700 - - 2,436 40,284
e.CD-Opllml Data Archiving 125,000 - - 125,000
..e 10.In Plant Sampling System Modffn 189.740 - 21.000 - 189.740
Final Sampler System Upgrades 30.260 447 567 13.934 16.326
11. Improvements to Central Generation 607,800 - - - 607,800
Beier Chemical Dosing System 2.800 - - 3.489 (659)
,y Piping Insulation Addition 4,800 - - 332 4,468
Steam System Modim 34,600 - - - 34,600
12,Cable Tray Improvements 2,400,000 - - - 2,400,000
13.Mbc Job Plan Projects (See Schedule E) 16,525,D00 313,520 177,517 818,a56 15,906,144
d Sub-Total-Interplant a Joint 356,564,800 5,612,262 1,831,854 7.682.485 348.8B2,315
Sub-Total-Major Projects 983,542,174 52,609.503 19.337.169 59.828,241 924,013.933
E.Special Projects,Studies 8 Research
m 1.Master Planning Issues
a.Pens/Admin.Support Fac @ Pit 1 J-26,J-30 298,000 274,935 210,056 274,991 23,009
Transfer to Project Below
Didnota ORce Space Utilaabon Study,J-38-1 201,480 - - 3,016 198.464
d b.Peak Hydraulic D scharge/Outfall Studies 2,850,000 - 153.000 - 2.850,000
- Transfer to Project Below (1,151,000) - - - (1,151,000)
Determination of Peak Hydraulic Discharge 1.151,000 - - 22.207 t 128,793
c Coil.Tdmnl B Dbp Faa Strategic Study 4.225.000 - - - 4,225,000
w d. NPDES Permit Support 1,175,000 427.445 273 462.796 712,204
2.Air Quality Contort Program - - 165,000 -
a.Tosip and ROG Control:BiotdrJding filter R a D 440,000 304,697 24.850 334.571 105,429
m b.Air Embsiuns:Source Control Feasibility Study/Medal 75,000 - - - 75,000
c.Air Oualiry,Management Implementation Plan 150,000 21,640 - 21,640 128,360
d.Bial fter for Pump Stations 50,000 - - - 50.000
e.A.G.Database Development 75.000 - - - 75.000
ro I.Central Gen Parameter Monftonng 350,000 3.519 3.519 346.481
Sub-Tolil-Special Projects 9,889,480 1.032,236 553,179 1,122,740 8,766,740
F.Equipment Items 52.725,000 1.666.785 1,171.178 2,599.999 50.125,001
v Sub-Total-Joint Works Capital Requirements 1,046,456.654 55,308,524 63,55D,980 982,905,674
Construction In Progress Completed at 6130195 95,017,660 96.062.212 (95.062,2121
r, Total Joint Works Capital Requirements 1.046,456,654 150.326,164 21,061,526 158,613.192 887,843.462
Section 3 -Page 7
lr
u
i
u
+r
iJ
u
V
This page was intentionally left blank 1
60
t
w
w
W
section 3- Page 8
LI
1..1
il
IWI
V
u SECTION 4,
BUDGET REVIEW BY DISTRICT
it
i.�
u
J
J
u
U
u
Budget Review by District
All Districts Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review
6 Months Ended 12/31/96
` Operating Budget Review
1995-96 Year-To- Remaining Year-To-Date
Budget Date Budget % Expanded
REVENUES:
Tax Levy(No. 11 Bond Fund Only) 17.000 1,863 15,137 10.96%
Tax Alloca8ons/Subventions(Share of 1%) 31,146,000 14,165,740 16,980,260 4548%
Federal and State Construction Grants - - - 0.00%
Connection Fees 4,748,000 1.559.085 3,188,915 32.84%
IRWD Fees 9,100,000 - 91100,000 0.00%
Other Fees 67,511,000 33,645,496 33,865,504 49,84%
Sale of Capacity Rights 644,000 5.883 638,117 0.91%
r, Interest& Misc. Receipts 15.799,000 11.675,734 4,123,266 73.90%
Other 2,000 2,000 0.00%
Total Revenues 128,967,000 61,053,801 67,913,199 47.34%
OUTLAYS:
Share of Joint Works Trmt. Plant 33,530,000 8.287.008 25,242.992 24.72%
r, District Trunk Sewer Construction 13,420,000 6.220,725 7.199.275 46.35%
COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 34,618,000 19,812,712 14,805,288 57.23%
Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 54,380,000 24,080,709 30,319,291 44.25%
v District Operating&Other Expenditures 9,592,000 5,397,898 4,194,102 56.28%
Total Outlays 145,540.000 63,779,052 81,760,948 43.82%
Capital Facilities Budget Rmj@yr
Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance
s 7/1196 &Additions Fixed Assets 9130196
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
.a Districts 1-14 Construction in Progress 22,693,603 6,220,725 (14,416) 28,899.912
Share of Joint Works 56,099,663 8,287,008 (1,791,862) 61.594.809
Sub-Total 77.793,286 14,507,733 (1,806,278) 90,494.721
COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT&EQUIP:
Land and Property Rights 2,646,921 - - 2,645,921
Collection Lines and Pump Suns. 277,817,024 4 8,710 277,825,738
Treatment Facilities 19,922 - - 19,922
Disposal Facilities 101,528 - - 101,528
General Plant and Admin. Facil. 855,176 - 5,706 860,882
Equity in Joint Treatment Facil. 692.378,501 (5,832,286) 1,791,862 688.338,077
_ Other Assets at Cost Less Amon. 91,868 (33,246) 58,622
Sub-Total 973,909,940 (5,865,528) 1,806,278 969.850,690
Total Property, Plant& Equipment&CIP 1,051,703.206 8,642,205 - 1,060,345,411
Section 4-Page 1
Li
1995-96 Mid-Year Report
District 1 - Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review
6 Months Ended 12/31195
iI
ODerill Budget Review
1995-96 Year-To- Remaining Year-to-Date
Budget Dale Budget % Expended
REVENUES:
Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Only) - - - 0.0o% j� I
Tax Alloptions/Subvemions(Share of 1%) 2,105,000 834.011 1,270,969 39.62% V
Federal and State Construction Grants - - - 0.0D%
Connection Fees 71,000 2.350 68,650 3.31% 1
Other Fees 6,447,000 3,043,726 3,403,274 47.21% V.1
Sale of Capacity Rights 63,000 1,099 61,901 1.74%
Interest&Misc. Receipts 925,000 875,829 49,171 94.68%
Other - - 0.00% yy
Total Revenues 9,611,000 4.757,015 4,853,985 49.50%
OUTLAYS:
Share of Joint Works Tnnt. Plant 3,279,000 815,921 2,463,079 24,88%
District Trunk Sewer Construction 75,000 - 75,000 0.00%
COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 4,289,000 2,619,629 1,669,371 61.08% 60
Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 5.411,000 2,478,056 2,932,944 45.80%
District Operating&Other Expenditures 587,000 414,311 172,689 70.58%
Total Outlays 13,641,000 6,327,917 7,313,083 46.39%
Capital Facilities Budget Review j
Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance
711/96 &Additions Fixed Assets 12/31/96
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
District No. 1 Projects -
Sub-Total - - -
Share of Joint Works 5,414,989 815,921 (176,140) 6,054,769
Sub-Total 5,414,989 815,921 (176,140) 6,054,769
i
v
COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT&EQUIP:
Land and Property Rights 81,398 - - 81,398
Collection Lines and Pump Stns. 6.902,929 - - 6,902,929
Treatment Facilities - - - -
Disposal Facilities 11,593 - - 11,593
General Plant and Admin. Facil. 58,241 - - 58,241 Wd
Equity in Joint Treatment Facil. 69.566,209 (573.290) 176,140 69.169,059
Other Assets at Cost Less Amort. 1,424 (570) - 854
Sub-Total 76,621,794 (573,860) 176,140 76,224,074 L
Total Property, Plant& Equipment&CIP 82,036,763 242,061 - 82,278,843
6d
Section 4-Page 2 1 '
L
Budget Review by District
d District No. 2 -Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review
6 Months Ended 12/31/95
Ooetatina Budget Review
1995-96 Year-To Remaining Year-To-Date
Budget Date Budget % Expended
m REVENUES:
Tax Levy(Bond Funds)Only) - - - 0.00%
Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of 1%) 9,515,000 4,350,678 5,164.322 45.72%
Federal and State Construction Grants - - - 0.00%
Connection Fees 2.350,000 972,312 1.377.688 41.37%
Other Fees 22,633,000 10,648.666 11,984,334 47.05%
Sale of Capacity Rights 191,000 (1,000) 192,000 -0.52%
Interest&Misc. Receipts 4,665,000 3.288,494 1.366,506 70.64%
Other 2,000 2,000 0.00%
Total Revenues 39,346,000 19,259,150 20.086,850 48.95%
m OUTLAYS:
Share of Joint Works Trent. Plant 9.921.000 2,474.462 7,446,538 24.94%
District Trunk Sewer Construction 700,000 382,416 317,584 54.63%
COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 11,392,000 6.945.367 4,446,633 60.97%
Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 17,619,000 7.629.277 9.989,723 43.30%
District Operating&Other Expenditures 2,202,000 1.582.996 619.002 71.89%
Total Outlays 41.834,000 19,014.520 22,819,480 45.45%
Capital Facilities Budget Review
Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance
7H/95 &Additions Fixed Assets 12/31/95
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
2-14-5112 SARI Manhole 155,846 139,777 - 295,623
2-7A Atwood Subtmnk @ 91/57 Interchange 5.319 6,948 - 12,167
2-38 Olive Subtrunk&BAR Crossings for S.A.Widening 13,624 - - 13,624
w 2-37 Miscellaneous Improvements to Pump Stations 325 - - 325
2-36 Sewer Encasements for AT&SF Commuter Rail 64,648 115,608 - 180,256
- 2-9-RI Cypress Ave.Subtmnk Sewer Rehab. 2,894.115 119,380 - 3.013.495
Misc Chgs to Closed Work Orders 6,184 219 - 6,403
d 2-35 Euclid Trunk B Interceptor 8.167 584 8.751
Sub-Total 3,148.228 382.416 3.530,64.4
m Share of Joint Works 16.180.235 2,474.462 (527,345) 18.127,352
Sub-Total 19.328,463 2,856,878 (527,345) 21.657,996
COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT& EQUIP:
v
Land and Property Rights 517,694 - - 517,694
Collection Lines and Pump Stns. 93.701.134 - - 93.701.134
Treatment Facilities - - - -
Disposal Facilities 33.172 - - 33,172
General Plant and Admin. Facil. 215,420 - - 215.420
Equity in Joint Treatment Facil. 205,201,314 (1,716.370) 527,345 204,012,289
e Other Assets at Cost Less Amon. 60.100 (10.221) 49.879
Sub-Total 299.728.834 (1,726,591) 527,345 298,629,688
Total Property, Plant&Equipment&CIP 319,057,297 1.130,287 320,187,584
Section 4-Page 3
L
1995-96 Mid-Year Report
District No. 3 -Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review V(
6 Months Ended 12131/96
Operating Budget Review I
1995-96 Year-To. Remaining Year-To-Data ne
Budget Data Budget % Expended
REVENUES: Y,
Tex Levy(Bond Funds)Only) - - - 0.00%
Tax AI!arationsJSutiventions(Sham of l%) 10,615.000 4.883,452 5.731,548 46.01%
Federal and State Consuucuon Grants - - - 0.00%
Connection Fees 1.410,000 63.920 1,346,000 4.53% .�
Other Fees 22,314,000 11.670,205 10,643.795 52.30%
Sale of Capacity Rights 196,000 (8,484) 204,484 4.33%
Interest B Misc.Receipts 5,070,000 3.680.495 1.389,505 72.59%
Other 0.00% Gil
Total Revenues 39,605,000 20,289,588 19,315,412 5123%
OUTLAYS:
Sharp of Joint Works Tmd.Plant 10,213.000 2447A76 7,765,524 23.06% y
Distinct Trunk Sewer Construction 5.288.000 1.610.020 3,677,980 30.45%
COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 10,694,000 6.284.245 4,409,755 55.76%
Sham of Joint Works Operating Expenses 16,564,000 7,207.373 9,356.627 43.51%
District Operating&Other Expenditures 2,516,000 1,535.402 980.598 61.03%
Total Outlays 45,275,000 19,084,516 26,190,484 42.15%
i
Capital Facilities B} cloet Review yral
Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance
711195 &Additions Fixed Assets 12/31/95 1 !
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: lek
3-250mnge-Western 5uo-Trunk Relief Sewer 56,509 - - 56,609
11-17 Slater PIS Upgrade-3&11 900.481 179,329 - 1,087,810 r
3.36 Teethe Pipe Replacement 1,563292 420.691 1,983,963 r
3-36R Rapt.Westminster Ave.Force Mains 222,510 637.341 - 859.951
3-371-5 widening Protect 8,177 116 - 8,293
3.38 Mi1ler4folder Trunk Sewer Improvements 410.491 27,220 - 437,711
3-38-1 Improv,to Miller-Hadar Trask Sewer 2A20 - - 2.420
3.3&2 Improv.to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer 796.678 344.331 - 1,141.009
3-38-3 Improv.to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer 4,780 640 - 5.420
3-39 Miller-Holder Easement 8,752 - 8,752 1
Miscellaneous Charges to Closed W.O. 1,629 352 1.981 an'
SuE-Tobl 3.983.819 1,610,020 5,593,839
Share of Joint Works 16.860.104 2.447.476 (545,801) 181761,779 y
Sub-Total 20,843.923 4.057,496 (545.801) 24,355.618
COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIP:
Land and Pmperty Rights 250,231 - - 280,231
Collection Lines and Pump Sms. 62.059.818 - - 62,069,818
Treatment Facilities 9,922 - - 9.922
Disposal Facilities 28,419 - - 2&419 y
General Plant and Admin.Fact1. 317.991 - - 317,991
Equity in Joint Treatment Feed. 211,213.109 (1,T76,440) 545,801 209,911l
Other Assets at Cost Lou Amon - - - - -
Su?Total 273.919,490 (1,T76,440) 545,901 272,688.851
Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 294,763,413 2,281.056 297,044469
Id
Section 4.Page 4
L
u Budget Review by District
District#5 -Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review
6 Months Ended 12/31/95
Operating Budget Review
1995-96 Year To. Remaining Year-To-Date
Budget Date Budget %Expended
REVENUES:
Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Only) - - - 0.00%
Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of 1%) 2,415,000 1,184,398 1,230,602 49,04%
Federal and State Construction Grants - - - 0.00%
Connection Fees 47,000 108,100 (61,100) 230.CD%
Other Fees 2,719.000 1,511,076 1,207.924 55.57%
Sale of Capacity Rights 23,000 1,642 21,358 7.14%
m Interest&Misc. Receipts 1,295,000 886,30E 408,692 68.44%
Other 0.00%
Total Revenues 6.499,000 3,691,524 2,807.476 56.80%
ve OUTLAYS:
Share of Joint Works Trmt Plant 1,204,000 259.797 944,203 21.58%
District Trunk Sewer Construction 500,000 209,068 290,932 41.81%
COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 2,013,000 633.638 1,379,362 31 48%
Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 2,007,000 964,429 1,042,671 4&05%
District Operating&Other Expenditures 765.000 291,978 473,022 38A7%
rd Total Outlays 6.489.000 2.358,910 4,130.090 36.35%
Capital Facilities Budget Review
Balance Adjustments Tmnsferto Balance
711195 &Additions Fixed Assets 12/31/95
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
,e 5-33 Bay Bridge PIS Impr. 2,224 14 - 2,238
5.35 So.Coast Trunk Sewer-Ind Phases 1 &2 - 3,019 - 3.019
5-36 Crystal Cove P/S - 7,208 - 7,208
Miscellaneous Charges to Closed W.O. 1.041 894 - 1.935
5.31 Coast Highway Force Main Replacement 5&6 - 4 - 4
532 Bitter Pt&Rocky Pt PtS Improv.5&6 1.921 - - 1.921
5-37-3&4 PCH Gravity Swr Rehab 5&6 22,036 169,281 - 191,317
..0 639 Siphon 5&6 695.190 16 - 695,206
Bey Bridge PIS Lighting 5&6 4,893 28,014 (8,274) 24.633
Hydrogen Peroxide Trials 5&14 714 618 1,332
Sub-Total 728.019 209,068 (8,274) 928.813
Share of Joint Works 2,028,462 259,797 (64,686) 2,223.573
Sub-Total 2,756,481 468,865 (72.960) 3,152.386
4, COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIP:
Land and Property Rights 69,740 - - 69.740
Collection Lines and Pump Stns. 33,827,105 - 8.274 33,835.379
Treatment Facilities 7,347 - - 7,347
.e Disposal Facilities 7,115 - - 7,115
General Plant and Admin. Facil. 39,799 (397) - 39.402
Equity In Joint Treatment Facll. 25.554.914 (210,780) 64.686 25,408.820
.. Omer Assets at Cast Less Amort. 18.009 (14.009) 4,000
Sub-Total 59.524.029 (225.186) 72,960 59,371.803
Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 62,280,510 243,679 62.524.169
y
Section 4-Page 5
L
1995-96 Mid-Year Report
District No. 6-Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review d
6 Months Ended 12/31/95
Operating Budget Review
1995-96 Year-To- Remaining Year-To-Oats
Budget Date Budget % Expended
REVENUES:
Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Only) - - - 0.00%
Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of 1%) 1,225,000 646,399 678,601 44.60%
Federal and State Construction Grants - - - 0.00% 1 ;
Connection Fees 47,000 19,270 27,730 41.00% 6A
Omer Fees 3,400,000 1,783,705 1,616,295 52.46%
Sale of Capacity Rights 31,000 (3,236) 34,236 -10.44%
Interest&Misc.Receipts 747,000 630.638 116,362 84.42% 6�
Other 0.00%
Total Revenues 5.450,000 2,976,776 2,473,224 64.62%
OUTLAYS: {w
Share of Joint Works Turd. Plant 1,596,000 349,210 1.246,790 21.88%
District Trunk Sewer Constnrction 1,735,000 762.751 972,249 43.96%
COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 1.468,000 769,098 698,902 52.39%
Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 2,599,000 909,399 1.689,601 34.999/6 'y
District Operating&Other Expenditures 251,000 138,8D0 112,200 55.30%
Total Outlays 7,649.000 2,929.258 4,719,742 38.30%
W
Capital Facilities Budget Review
Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance
711195 &Additions Fixed Assets 12131195
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
Mist. Chg.to Closed Work Order (32,767) 3,569 - (29,198) M
14-1-1 A&B Gisler Int., 14-1-2 Baker Street 1,079,358 65,832 - 1,145,190
6-12 Fabvelw Relief 248.599 16,222 - 264.821
6-13 Air Base Sewers Abandonment 29.699 - - 29,599
Airbase Flowmeter Replacement 19,155 - - 19.155
5-32 Bitter Pt&Rocky PI P/S Imprint.5&6 700 2 - 702
5-37-3&4 PCH Gravity Swr Rehab 5&6 8,891 677,125 - 686,016
5-39 Siphon 5&6 36,589 1 36.590
Sub-Total 1,390,124 762.751 - 2.152.875
Share of Joint Works 2.623.625 349ZO (84,038) 2,888,797 dri
Sub-Total 4,013,749 1,111,961 (84,038) 5,041,672
COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIP: 1
Land and Property Rights 562 - - 562 Iml
Collection Lines and Pump Stns. 4,179,148 - 4.179,148
Treatment Facilities 2.653 - - 2.653
Disposal Facilities 7.394 - - 7,394
- 9
General Plant and Admin.Facil. 94.197 397 4,594 4'
Equity in Joint Treatment Facil. 32,001,104 (273,523) 84,038 31,811.619
Other Assets at Cost Less Amort. 9,011 (7,117) - 1,894
Sub-Total 36,294,069 (280,243) 84,038 36,097.864
Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 40,307,818 831.718 41,139,536
Section 4-Page 6
L
Budget Review by District
District No.7 -Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review
6 Months Ended 12131195 -
Operating Budget Review
1995-96 Year-To- Remaining Year-to Daee
Budget Date Budget %Expended
REVENUES:
d Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Only) - - - 0.00%
Tax Allocations/Subventiens(Sham of l%) 3,230.000 1,408.295 1,821,705 43.60%
Federal and Slate Construction Grants - - - 0.00%
Connection Fees 235.000 196,333 48.667 79.29%
G Other Fees 5,960,000 2.878.995 3.081,005 48.31%
Sale of Capacity Rights 53,000 11,550 41,450 21.79%
Interest&Misc.Receipts 1,526,000 1,112,990 413.010 72.94%
Other 0.00%
G Total Revenues 11,004,000 5,598,163 5,405.837 50.87%
OUTLAYS:
Share of Joint Works Tont.Plant 2,780,000 765,588 2,014.412 27.54%
District Trunk Sewer Construction 2,400,000 1.890,275 509,725 78.76%
COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 2,401,000 1.364.986 1,036,014 66.85%
Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 4,655,000 2.258,488 2,396,512 48.52%
Ostrict Operating&Other Expenditures 1,959,000 856,484 1,102,516 43.72%
" Total Outlays 14,195,000 7,135,821 7,059,179 50.27%
Capital Facilities Budget Review
,® Balance Adjustments Transforto Balance
711195 &Additions Fixed Assets 12/31195
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
7-22 Parallel&Repl.Lemon Heights 173,397 1,197.047 - 1,370,444
`�• 7.23-1 College Ave. Pump Son Repl Force Mains 16,991 1.020 - 18.011
Mac Arthur PIS Ventilation 5.706 - (5,706) -
7.7-1 Main St P/S Impmv. 54,852 41,705 - 96.557
r 7-18 Orange Park Acres Sewer Study 124,537 - - 124.537
7-19 Cowan Heights Sewer 55,335 - - 55,335
14-1-1 A&B Gisler Int,14-1-2 Baker Street
Force Main Districts 6,7&14 2,315,534 149,618 - 2,465,152
S, Swr Mice Easement Index Books 13.238 - - 13,238
7-14 Abandon 9 P/S,7-14.1&2 239,168 475,401 - 714,569
7-16 Lemon Heights Sewer 57,172 400 - 57,572
7-1-1 Gisler/Redhill Trunk Abandonment 9,716 676 - 10,392
�+ Techde Pipe Replacement 2,563 - 2,663
7-17 Orange Park Acres Sewer Repl. 35.160 - - 35,160
Miscellaneous Charges to Closed W.O. 1,876 24,408 26,284
m Sub-Total 3,105,345 1,890275 (5,706) 4,989,914
Share of Joint Works 4.552,553 765.588 (150.337) 5.167,805
Sub-Total 7,657,898 2.655.063 (156,043) 10.157,719
w COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIP:
Land and Property Rights 1,549.310 - - 1.549.310
. Collection Lines and Pump Sins. 36.089,277 4 - 36.089,281
Treatment Facilities - - - -
`� Disposal Facilities 10,782 - - 10,782
General Plant and Admin.Facil. 92,099 - 5,706 97.805
Equity in Joint Treatment Facil. 57,219.422 (489,30B) 160,337 56,880.451
Other Assets at Cost Less AmorL 3,324 (1,329) 1.995
Sub-Total 94,964,214 (490.633) 166.043 94.629,624
Total Property,Plants Equipment&CIP 102,622,112 2,185,230 104,787.343
-. Section 4-Page 7
1995-96 Mid-Year Report
District No. 11 -Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review ti
6 Months Ended 12/31/96
Operating Budget Review u
1995-96 Year-To- Remaining Year-to-Date
Budget Date Budget % Expended
REVENUES: �
Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Only) 17.000 1,863 15,137 10.96%
Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of 1%) 2,041,000 958,507 1,082,493 46.96% i i
Federal and State Construction Grants - - - 0.00% iol
Connection Fees 118,000 206,800 (88,800) 175.25%
Other Fees 3,220,000 1,718,029 1,501,971 53.35% 'I
Sale of Capacity Rights 40,000 4,925 35,075 12.31% ti+
Interest B Misc. Receipts 931,000 820,322 110,678 88.11%
Other - - - 0.00%
Total Revenues 6,367,000 3,710,446 2,656,554 58.28%
OUTLAYS:
Share of Joint Works Tnnt Plant 2,099,000 534,434 1,564,566 26.46% 6,
District Trunk Sewer Construction 1.635,000 968,281 666,719 59.22%
COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 2,176,000 1,107,791 1,068,209 50.91%
Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 3,486,000 1,866,046 1,619,954 63.63% 160
District Operating &Other Expenditures 737,000 412,082 324,918 55.91%
Total Outlays 10,133,000 4.888,634 5,244,366 48.24% ,
Capital Facilities Budget Review
Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance
711195 &Additions Fixed Assets 12/31195
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
Slater P/S Motor&Pump 47 - - 47
11-17 Slater P/S Sewage Sys Improv. 4,414,216 966,281 - 5,382,497
Miscellaneous Charge to Closed W.O. 954 - - 954
Sub-Total 4,415,217 968,281 - 5,383,498 id
Share of Joint Works 3,471,604 534,434 (113,246) 3,892,792
Sub-Total 7,886,821 1,502,715 (113,246) 9,276,290 yj
COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIP:
Land and Property Rights 146,986 - - 146,986 5
Collection Lines and Pump Stns. _ 19,048,602 - - 19,048,602 4J
Treatment Facilities - - - -
Disposal Facilities 3,053 - - 3,053 '
General Plant and Admin. Facil. 30,682 - - 30,682
Equity in Joint Treatment Facil. 43,058,620 (368,585) 113,246 42,803,281
Other Assets at Cost Less Amort. - - - - I
Sub-Total 62,287,943 (368,585) 113,246 62,032,604 1p
Total Property, Plant&Equipment&CIP 70,174,764 1,134,130 - 71,308,894
U
Section 4-Page 8
I�
Budget Review by District
® District No. 13 - Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review
6 Months Ended 12/31/95
O ej ring Budget Review
1995 -96 Year-To- Remaining Year-To-Date
m Budget Date Budget %Expended
REVENUES:
Tax Levy (Bond Fund(s)Only) - - - 0.00%
Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of 1%) - - - 0.00%
Federal and State Construction Grants - - - 0.00%
Connection Fees 470,000 - 470,000 0.00%
Other Fees 818,000 388,414 429,586 47.48%
Sale of Capacity Rights 6,000 577 5,423 9.62%
Interest& Misc. Receipts 382,000 299,158 82,842 78.31%
Other - 0.00%
Total Revenues 1.676,000 688,149 987,851 41.06%
OUTLAYS:
Share of Joint Works Tm t. Plant 322,000 92,404 229,596 28.70%
District Trunk Sewer Construction 472,000 - 472,000 0.00%
COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 27,000 12,780 14.220 47.33%
Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 576,000 258,478 317,522 44.87%
District Operating& Other Expenditures 64,000 18,710 45,290 29.23%
Total Outlays 1.461,000 382,372 1,078,628 26.17%
Capital Facilities Budget Review
Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance
7/1/95 &Additions Fixed Assets 12/31/95
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
Share of Joint Works 516,108 92,404 (17,202) 591,310
Sub-Total 516,108 92,404 (17,202) 591,310
COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT& EQUIP:
Land and Property Rights - - - -
Collection Lines and Pump Sins. 2,616,757 - - 2,616,757
Treatment Facilities - - - -
Disposal Facilities - - - -
General Plant and Admin. Facil. - - - -
Equity in Joint Treatment Facil. 6.402"0 (55,988) 17,202 6,363,654
- Other Assets at Cost Less Amon. - - - -
Sub-Total 9,019.197 (55.988) 17,202 8,980,411
Total Property, Plant& Equipment&CIP 9,535,305 36.416 - 9,571,721
Section 4-Page 9
1995-96 Mid-Year Report
District No. 14 -Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review
6 Months Ended 12/31/95
Operating Budget Review
i
1995-96 Year-To- Remaining Year-to-Date
Budget Date Budget % Expended
REVENUES:
r
Tax Levy(Band Fund(s)Only) - - - 0.00%
Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of 1%) - - - 0.00%
Federal and State Construction Grants - - - 0.00%
IRWD Fees 9,100,000 - 9.100.000 0.00%
Other Fees - 2,680 (2,680) 0.00% r
Sale of Capacity Rights 41,000 (1,190) 42,190 -2.90% '
Interest& Misc. Receipts 268,000 81,500 186,500 30.41%
Other 0.00%
Total Revenues 9.409,000 82,990 9,326,010 0.85% L,
OUTLAYS:
Share of Joint Works Trmt. Plant 2,116,000 547.716 1,568,284 25.88% r
District Trunk Sewer Construction 615,000 397,914 217,086 64.70% i
COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 158,000 75,178 82,822 47,58% V
Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 1,463,000 489,163 973,837 33.44%
District Operating&Other Expenditures 511.000 147,133 363,867 28.79% ty
Total Outlays 4,863,000 1,657,104 3,205,896 34.08%
Capital Facilities Budget Review 1
Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance L
7/1f95 &Additions Fixed Assets 12/31/95
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
Main Street Flume Flowmeter - 40 - 40
14-1.1 A&B Gisler Int., 14-1-2 Baker St.
Force Main, Districts 6,7& 14 5,827,644 396,367 - 6.224,011 j
Main St. Pump Station Improvements 7-7-1 94.911 - - 94,911 !✓
Bay Bridge PIS Lighting 5&6 258 1,474 (436) 1,296
Hydrogen Peroxide Trials 38 33 - 71 `
ei
Bub-Total 5,922,851 397,914 (436) 6,320,289
Share of Joint Works 3,451,983 547,716 (113,067) 3,886,632
Sub-Total 9,374,834 945,630 (113.503) 10,206,921
COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIP:
Land and Property Rights - - - -
Collection Lines and Pump Stns. 19.382,254 - 436 19,382,690 ~
Treatment Facilities - - - -
Disposal Facilities - - - -
General Plant and Admin. Facil. 6,747 - - 6,747
Equity in Joint Treatment Facil. 42,161.369 (368.002) 113,067 41,906,434
Other Assets at Cost Less Amort. - - - - L
Sub-Total 61,550.370 (368,002) 113,503 61,295,871
Total Property, Plant&Equipment&CIP 70,925,204 577,628 - 71,502,792
I
Section 4-Page 10
4
U
u
Li
u SECTION 5.
SELF-INSURANCE FUNDS BUDGET REVIEWS
J
J
.1
f
.I
1
Self-Ins. Review
Medical Fund Budget Review
6 Months Ended 12131/95
Percent
Actual of Budget Remaining Actual
1995.96 Through Through 1995-96 Through Increase
Budget 12131195 12131196 Budget 12/31/94 (Decrease)
.r
Beginning Cash Balance 15,000 85,952
Revenues:
In-Lieu Prom. -CSDOC 400,000 172,473 43.12% 227,527 135,172 37,301
..r. -Employees 75.000 21,613 28.82% 53,387 15,957 5,656
Reimburse from Stop Loss Ins - - 339 (339)
Interest&Other 1,206 (1,206) 1,206
Total Revenues 475,000 195,292 41.11% 279,708 151.468 43,824
-, Expenditures:
Claims-Medical' - - 0,00% - 6,203 (6,203)
,y -Dental 387,000 119,543 30.89% 267,457 159,377 (39,834)
Contractural Services 50,000 18.053 36.11% 31,947 23,404 (5,351)
Total Expenditures 437,000 137,596 31.49% 299,404 188,984 (51,388)
Excess Revenue(Expense) 38,000 57,696 151.83% (19,696) (37.516) 95,212
r Ending Cash Balance 53,000 57,696 108.86% (19,696) 48,436 95,212
'Medical insurance has been purchased rather
a
than self-funded since February 1994.
Section 6-Page 1
L
Mid-Year Report
LL
Public Liability Fund Budget Review
6 Months Ended 12/31/95
Percent
Actual of Budget Remaining Actual
1995-96 Through Through 1996-96 Through Increase
Budget 12/31/95 12/31/95 Budget 12131/94 (Decrease)
bG
Beginning Cash Balance' 3,356,000 3,315,495 3,392,913
Revenues: u
In-Lieu Premiums 100,000 - 0.00% 100,000 - -
Interest&Other 200,000 89,743 44.87% 110,257 92,007 (2,264)
Allocation to Other Funds - 32,475 0.00% (32,475) 32,475
Total Revenues 300,000 122,218 40.74% 177,782 92,007 30,211 L
Expenditures:
Salaries 1,000 3,143 314.30% (2,143) - 3,143 "
Claims 90,000 22,000 24.44% 68,000 4,579 17,421 N
Contractual Services 20,000 656 3.28% 19,344 1,941 (1,185)
Legal Services 150,000 99,524 66,35% 50,476 21,222 78,302 1
Professional Services 10,0D0 462 4.62% 9,538 1,510 (1,048) �I
Supplies 8 Other 1,000 114 11.40% 886 - 114
Total Expenditures 272,000 125,899 46.29% 146,101 29,152 96,747 V
Excess Revenue(Expense) 28,000 (3,681) (13.15%) 31,681 62,855 (66,536) L
Ending Cash Balance 3,384,000 3,311,814 97.87% 72,186 3,455,768 (143,954)
Ir
Includes$720,208 long-term receivable due from the County of Orange. L
ti
L
61
Section 5-Page 2
L
Self-ins. Review
w
Worker's Compensation Fund Budget Review
6 Months Ended 12/31/95
Percent
.. Actual of Budget Remaining Actual
199649 Through Through 1"5.96 Through Increase
Budget 1=1195 12/31/95 Budget 12/31194 (geCr )
Y
Beginning Cash Balance' 795,000 848,241 748,810
Revenues:
In-Lieu Premiums 225,000 112,500 50.00% 112,500 112,500 -
Interest&Other 43,000 19,601 45.58% 23,399 16,614 2,987
Tonal Revenues 268,000 132,101 49.29% 135,899 129,114 2,987
Expenditures:
Salaries 10,000 - 0.00% 10,000 - -
Claim 165,000 88,940 53.90% 76,060 44,951 43,989
Contractual Services 35,000 12,500 35.71% 22,500 12.648 (148)
Legal Services 5,000 - 0.00% 5.000 - -
Professional Services 35,000 9,659 27.60% 25,341 13,325 (3,666)
Supplies&Other 12.000 0.00% 12,000
Sub Total 262,000 111,099 42,40% 150,901 70.924 40,175
w
Excess Loss Policy 45,000 10.830 24.07% 34.170 19,170 (8,340)
Total Expenditures 307,000 121.929 39.72% 185,071 90,094 31,835
Excess Revenue(Expense) (39,000) 10,172 (26.08%) (49,172) 39,020 (28,848)
Ending Cash Balance 756,000 658,413 87.09% 97,587 787,830 (129.417)
Includes$151,754 long-term receivable due from the County of Orange
Section S-Page 3
L
L
L
L+
L
L
IL
L
lr
This page was intentionally left blank L
Ir
L
6'
Li
L
LJ
L
L
SecUm 5-Pogo 4
L
L�
I�{
SECTIONS 6. & 7.
OPERATIONAL REVIEW
L1
li
'J
Ui
i1
Activity Trends
Joint Operating expenses are 44%of budget through the first half of the year. Budget savings have been realized on
chemicals as new contract prices have declined. Green Acres Project water prices have also declined as a result of
the renegotiated agreement for 1995-96. Natural gas use is decreasing as we gain experience with the Central
Generation Facilities.
Overall, salaries have increased by only 3.20% compared to last year as a result of savings from the early retirement
program and an average vacancy rate of approximately 10%in authorized positions. Salary expenses will continue to
increase over last year as a result of new hires being included and accounted for over the remaining quarters.
700
$627.30
$599.00
600 $555.87
500
400
095-96 Budget
■95-96 Target
■6 Mwthserded 12/31195 300 236.85 236.85 237.50
200
100
r 0 Treatment Cost, Average Daily Flow,
$per MG MGD
Section 6 - Page 1
L
Mid - Year Report
J
Board Secretary:
The initial preparation hrm s submitted for Joint Board agenda pactaages and minutes as reflected In the 9596 Budget were L✓
estimates made without baseline data. Beginning in July, 1995, the Board Secretary's Office has tracked actual time spent on
these tasks. The first six months reflects actual hours spent on the Joint Board agenda paGage and minutes. The differentiation
between estimates and acluals was unanticipated;however a comparison between first quarter data and sir month data radicals the
listed Ems is more agate than anginal estimates. These data will be used for future baseline pmlections V
Iwf
450 43.0
40.0
6w
35.0
30.0 1
25.0 20.0 V
095-96 Budget 20.0 17.0
■6 Months Ended
15.0 i
10.0 Li
4.0
8A �
0.0 rr
Agenda Prep.Thne, Completion of Minutes,
Mrs. Nrs,
Communications: L
The number of tours during the first su months is an target with annual estimates. The number M people contacted was
extraordinarily high during the first quarter as it Includes throe individuals who visited the County Sanitation Districts of Orange
County booth at the Orange County Fair. Second quarter contacts averaged approximately 1000,plating us ahead of the annual r
projection. The number of informational materials provided is also extmon inadly high due to our participation in the Orange County
Fair. This has impacted the 6,rmonth cumulative figure. The division remains on target for the number of newsletters published.
320
r
300
I
250 222
r
200
O9S%Budget
06 Months Ended 150 it
100
100 + 90 81
51
50 25
14
0
No.of Tours 8 No.of People Informational No.of Employee
Presentations Contacted Materials Newsellers
X 100 Provided X 100 Published
6d
Section 6 - Page 2
L+
Activity Trends
Finance Administration:
The required coverage ratio for senior lien debt,the ratio of certain revenues to the debt service costs,is 1.25. Because one-ha8 of
�+ property taxes and user fees are received in December,and principal payments are made in August and February,the ratio will decline
during the remainder of the year. Investment Interest earnings are running ahead of the budgeted yield as PIMCO manages our portlolic.
Variable Interest rates required to remarket the COP issues have been favorable during the that quarter,as the"Orange County"penally
has declined and investors are more comfortable wish our credit. Approximately hall of our outstanding COPs era"synthetic-fined"rate
obligations. The number of COP issues outstanding is not expected m change this year as no new debt was budgeted.
9.00
8e5%
8.00
ee 7.00
6.00
5.78 6 6
5.00% 4.
5.00
O° 09&96 Budget 75 4.50
■6 Months Ended 4.00
3.00 2 28
w 2.00
1.0
m 0'00 VIeM%on Avg.COP Outstanding
Sr.Debt Svc. Invested Interest Rate COP Issues
Coverage Ratio Reserves %
Accounting:
s, Accounts payable warrants and payroll warrants par FTE are slightly behind annual projections,however they are within expected
estimates as they are running rn 47%of annual totals. Both Industrial user bills and journal entries processed per FTE are also within
the anticipated range.
5,900
c 6.000
5.000
4.100
4,000 3.750
3.000 2,760
095-96 Budget 2,094
Me Months Ended 2AW 1.781
952
r 1,000 486
0
Accounts Payable Payroll Warrants Industrial User Bills Journal Entries
r" Warrants Issued Processed Processed Per FTE Pfamesetl
Per FTE Per FTE Per FTE
Section 6 - Page 3
Mid - Year Report
u
Purchasing& Warehousing:
Purchase orders issued per Full-time Equivalent(FTE)are slightly below an expected 6-norM bards as precedual changes Impacted
purchase order issuance,as well ss the Districts-wide commitments to reduce Me Joint Operating Expense budget by 10-A. The u
number of bids per FTE has greatly exceeded inifial estimates as several RFPs were added for maintenance and professional services
fomterly handled in-house. As atltlftlonal oppmtunitiea arise to lower operating costs by awarding maintenance contracts W outside
firths,bids will increase. Warehouse issues par FTE are lower than this year's estimations,but in line with last year's actual. This is
partially attributable to the Districts-wlde mmmdrtreMs to reduce the Joint Operating Expense budget by 10%anti b reduce the r
number of hems kept in the warehouses. These hems include Pads such as nuts,bops and auto lifters.
r
20,000 18,670
r
15
15.000
2 11.429 r
095-MBUO N 10.000 8.350
86 Mordlw Ended
r
6.000 4.500
r
0.000
1----
P.O.'s Issued Per Wrden Bids Warehouse
FTE X 10 Per FTE Issues Per FTE
X 100
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
Section 6 - Page 4
Activity Trends
Information Technology Administration:
Computer Users Supported Per FulkTime Equivalerd(FTE)is based on the number of staff members In Information Technology
Department(ITD)tasked with provk ing direct support. The wrtent 57 FTE Userststaa m8ects what we believe to be an
understating issue that has a direct marmot on our ability to adequately support the Districts'computer users. This figure will be
lowered when a contract is approved for outsourcing some of the hardware and software support,thereby allowing in-house staff to
t7 conduct tasks not easily connected. Hardware Work Orders per FTE represent the number of Work Orders completed divided by
the number of RD staff assigned to such requests. The original benchmark of 17 was based solely on estimates as opposed to
actual data and is obviously inaccurate when compared against the 93IFTE year-to-date. Programmable Logic Controllers am on
target with Data Points behind the expect mid-year point:remover,many data points will be installed the third quarter.
120
m 120
93
m 72
67
095-96Budget 40
66 Mouths Ended
30 pg
Z1 13 8
e
0 17
Plant Automation
Computer Users Hardware Work Progarou ale Loglo Addmbiwl Data
Supported per FTE Orders par FTE Comhoams Inrsued Points Instil
orlon)
Hardware Support:
The phone directory numbers maintained per FIE Indicates the number of PBX or telephone lines serviced. Unexpected expansion
d In this system has assured in more numbers maintained than those reflected In the Activity Trend estimates for FY 199b96.
Similarly,due to the increasing use of technology,we have more personal computers than initially estimated. This case is also
reflected in the Card Readers graphic. Hardware work orders per FTE also reflect an unanticipated increase. Be u use of the
r addi8ons of the aforementioned devices,work orders to install and maintain them have also increased beyond initial estimates.
99
100.0
90.0 I
80.0
70.0
60.0 go
,y 095-96 Budget 60.0 i
11116 Months Ended 40.0
30.0
G 20.0 13.0 16.7 8 12
Fm10.0 --aininis- I r
0.0
Directory Numbers Personal Hardware Work Card Readers
out Makdeinsdi Computer Ordem/FTE Maintained/FTE
X10 MaimalnedlFfE
Section 6 -Page 6
L
Mid - Year Report
Software& Plant Automation:
Software work orders per FrE is above FV 199596 Activity Trend estimates and is an increase war 1st quarter actuals. Prior to this fisal year,
Information Technology(m utilized manual work orders. This process as been networked and automated via a Maintenance Management W
System(MMS)Mat allows other divisions to direct work orders to IT eleotronially. The ease of directing work orders to fT,the additional
internal controls requiring staff to he more stringent in documenting requests for service(e.g.quick service alp,and the expending user base
account for the increase. The number of network users supported per FrE results from atldtiional computer purchases and knplemerdation.
The vast majority of desktop computers are networked to one of several servers and thus ieqube ongoing netil troubleshooting, low
maintenance,repair and upgrade.
it
90
86 V
8D I
70 - L
60
�° L
O9lF%Budget {p
38
06 Months Ended 30 -
20 7 „ L
0 }
01 ,
SoBwarework Nell L
Orders/FIT Users Supported/FTE
L
I
L
I :
61
6d
L
Irrl
L
L
Section 6 - Page 6
L
Activity Trends
Human Resources Administration:
After further research,the Activ"dy Trends in the FY 1995-96 Budget required refinement to more accurately portray the Performance of the
Human Resources Department. Employees supported by sea HR position is slightly below the goal. Increased cross-training and
decreased regulation should allow us to achieve the target by next fiscel year. Human Resourcestmining as a percentageof operating
expense generally reflects National benchmarks.
9.0 8.3
8.0 4
7.0
to
eo
O96B6 Budget 4.0
89 M1lnlls Ended 2.6
$.a 2.3%
2.0
1.0
0.0
1 F
Employees Supported HRTmming as a%
m Per Human Resource of Operating Expense
Employee
X10
Human Resources & Training:
The Districts recruhmenl time Where to fill'numbers for new positions exceeds the National average by We to bur limes. This Is partially
due to the proportionally significant number of new hires(some within new classifications)occurring relatively simultaneously over the
m course of the last six months. Additional internal process controls should cut these numbers in had prior to July,1996. Posting Periods,
physical exams,supervisory delays,and notices to previous employers all play a pan In the notably high numbers. Turnover compares
extremely favorably to the benchmark for utility agencies and falls below the expected turnover redo of 10%nationally for private
organizations. The Dishicls'cost Par hire Is better than other utility districts and private organizations in exempt recruitment Exempt
employee costs ere significantly fewer as in-house staff are primarily used Instead of executive search fink. Non•exempl employee costs
have increased. Factors contributing to this are being researched but am likely due to the Increased number of'singl"ostRW
recruitments that occurred as opposed to recruitments filling more than one position in a given classification.
s 160 150
140
120
100 at $85.0
80
ry 095-96 Budget so
37
INS Months Ended 60
40
$17.92 $12.8 $21.1
s, 20 7.8% 4.4%
0
No.of Recmitmerd No.of Rezmitmem Employee Cost Per Exempt Cost per Nan-Exempt
m Days For Exempt Days For Non- Turnover Employee Hired Employee Hired
Employees Exempt Employees X 100 X 100
Section 6 - Page 7
I
N
Mid - Year Report
L
Safety 8 Emergency Response: -
During Me0rst six months.workem'mmpensa6on daims wham below the projection of twenty-two(22), Additionally,the Total Injury Rate was 6.5
as opposed to last years 6J—a 25%decrease. The Djshn s'aoddent experience is even more significant when compared to the 16.3 industry 6e
average for Total Injury Rate,and Is notably lower than the Mro previous years. We believe this can be attributed to the successful Implementation
of crew safety programs and Improvement in existing programs during the last several quarters. The last work day rating Is a reflation of these
programs. Job Huard Analyses and Regulatory Compliance Audits are generally on target
r
45
45 095-96 Budget v
40 11116 Months
Ended
35
30
30
25
20 20
20 17
16 V
10 6.7
5 6.5 7} I
5 3 2.5 1.5
0
No.of Job Site Total Injury Job Hazard
Workers' Safety Regulatory Los[Wodc Rate
Comp.Claims Compliance Compliance Day Rate Analysis
Audits Audds X 10
eiO
Iss
V
bw
Section 6 - Page 8
Activity Trends
Maintenance Administration:
As stipulated In the following maintenance sections,one of the pnmary focuses of the Maintenance Department in Facial Year 1995-961s
m to develop a solid database for our Computerized Mandenance Management System(CMl thereby devoting more 0me to a total
Planned Maintenance philosophy. The trends we develop this fiscal year will be utilized to project future expectations. The graph potmys
We broad of CMMS Implementation and resource allocation on the Maintenance Depardri as well as the temporary freezing of
authorized positions(WM tllscussed in fuller detail In Ore respective mairtenanw divisions). We all antiapate achieving a 2:1 ratio of
preventive maintenance(pm)tasks versus coneaive maintenance(en)realm. This onto is widely accepted and considered progressive
based on many maintenance industry benchmans/standarts.
60.0
52.0
50.0
40.0
46.4
p
30.0 26.1
G 2" 17A I
15
9.7 9.0 7.6
loo 6.4 5.0 4.7
0.0
Preventve Conedive Maint. Preventive Corrective a
Maintenance Entered Inca
Maintenance Tasks Maintenance Maintenance
Tasks Completed Completed Backlog Bacldog Suspended Computer
Cl 9598 Budget X 1000 X 1000 X 100 %100 %10 % 1000
06 Months Ended
Maintenance Scheduling:
The Planning 6 Scheduling Division is a new unit this fiscal year,and as such,did not have reliable himeline data to develop accurate
Activity Trend benchmarks. The goals stipulated in the FY 1995-96 budget are only reasonable estimates of new job duties to selabiish
fulum parameters. Disciplines have been reludant to mmova'unneeded'slork because May believed the hem wits would be deduded
from their budgets. However,we have recommended a redudion in obsolescent inventory by$160.000 for Me first six months of the year.
As a resuh of benchmerking preventive maintenance on major realty acceulemaints,our scheduled PM program for Prmary/Sewndary
lumms and digesters meets or exceeds our initial estimates. The disciplines are implementing such PM programs beginning last month.
29
30.0 -
25e
25.0
20.0
095-96 5.0 Budget I 11
96 Months Ended 10.0 }
}II 4 4 5
5.0 1.6
® 0.0 12
Reduce Perform Preventive Malntemmos on:
Obsolete Primary Digester Sexuadary
Inventory,$ Basins Cleaning swim
x 10,000
Section 6 - Page 9
Mid - Year Report
Yrl
Plant Maintenance:
During Me first haM of FY 19W96,emphasis was placed on the continued development o1 Me Computerized Maintenance
Management System(CRAMS)database and Its mquishe Inventory items. Approximately 78%and 73%respectively of the annual W
target for'Pieces of Equipment-Computerized'and'Preventive Maintenance Instructions'have been achieved the first six months.
Corrective tasks completed am well within targeted parameters,although PM tasks am below targets due to CRAMS Implementation. It
should be noted that accurate metrics from previous years are not available for comparative purposes and FY 1995-96 Activity Trends y
were beat estimates only. Trends developed this fiscal year will be utilized for future pmections.
L
600.0 550.0
500 I i
500.0 f
202
lad
°00'0 320.0
300.0 250.0 300 275 r '
]3.6 202
20,D LI
100.0 F59.1 42
V
0.0
Preventive Corrective Preventive Corrective Pieces of Computerized
Maintenance Tasks Maintenance Maintenance Maintenance Equipment Preventive
Completed Tasks Backlog Backlog in Computer Maintenance
OWN Budget X 10 Completed x 10 Database% 10 Inabuctiona
86 Months Ended
r
Collection Facli lea Maintenance:
V
Similar to outer maintenance divisions,Collection Fadl'rtlea is implementing this CRAMS system. Preventive and connective maintenance
figures are much higher than annual estimates as the CMMS system came on-line for this Division sooner than expected,
Computerized pieces of equlpment remain at 83%=.plate,while PM Instructions am 86%finished. Finally,spills reported are below
projections and represent a positive hand that reflects our continued commitment to providing quality service and the Implementation of
our expanded root control program for District 7.
90.0 86
80.0 09&96 Budget
86 Months Ended
70a
0.0 5 50
o.o °7'4
°0.0 30 35
30.0 19.7 20.0 21.5
20.0 197
6.0 12
10.0 0 y
0.0
Preventive Corrective Pieces of Active SPIIIs
Tasks Tasks Preventive Corrective Equip. Preventive Reported
Completed Completed Maintenance Maintenance Computerized Maintenance 1.1
%100 % 10 Backlog Baddog X1,000 Instructions
Section 6 - Page 10
Activity Trends
Mechanical Maintenance
A major goal of Me Division for FY 1995-M is the emphases on the development of the Computerized Maintenance Management System
(CMMS)database and is nyulsde inventory items. Approximately,83%of the annual target far'Please of Equipment-Computerized'has been
achieved through the first six months. The Division is in the process of completing chose Miming of all field level staff. The rapid expansion of
this database has resulted In a higher than anticipated preventive maintenance backlog. FUMennore,efforts to complete the Inventory database
required a shift In resources.Preventive maintenance and connective tasks completed are within targeted parameters and we have considerably
Improved our ongoing corrective maintenance backlog when compared against estimated annual Activity Trend projections. The Division has
maintained a 12%vacancy rate in order to rowel the 10%reduction in the Joint Operating Expense budget
80.0 C SS96 Budget 75.0
700 M6 Months Ended 62.1
r OD.0
50'0 41.4
40.0 36.0
r 30.0 27.0 25.0
17.9 Be 17.5 15 15.3
0.3
20.0
10.0
m 0.0
Preventive Corrective Preventive Corrective Pieces of Computerized
Maintenance Tasks Maintenance Maintenance Maintenance Equipment Preventive
V° Completed Tasks Backlog Backlog in Computer Maintenance
X 100 ComPletetl X 10 X 10 Database Instructions
X 1p0 X100 X 100
Electrical Maintenance:
A major goal of the Division for FV 1995-96 is the emphasis on the continued development of the Computerized Maintenance Management
System(CMMS)database and its requite inventory gems. Approximately 95%of the annual target for'Recent of Equipment-Computerized
has been achieved this quarter. The rapid expansion of this database has resulted in a higher than anticipated preventive maintenance
backlog. Furthermore,efforts to complete Me inventory database required a shift in resources resuting in lower production in the Preventive
Tasks Completed category. Conversely,corrective tasks completed are well within targeted parameters and we have considerably improved
our conecbrve maintenance backlog when compared against estimated annual Activity Trend projections. The Division has maintained a 9%
r vacancy rate in order to meet the 10%reduction in the Joint Operating Expense budget. Some positions will be filled in the third quarter and
allow us to focus on improving the preventive maintenance lacks completed and PM backlog.
720 -
O95-96 Budget 117.6
11116 Months Ended
100
+ 75 B0 76.3
00
65
m 60 T
40 } 35. 332.5 33A
129 20.0 18
d 2p i 11.9
0 Places ar Prevenunw,
Preven0kve CmrerAe penetabvs cormfive Marra ance
MalnlenanceTasks Madeline. Mamie.. Ma,,cerance EWP.Campulerbed Intuctions
Completed Tasks,Competed mckbg Backed Computeraee
XIN X100 xIf) X100
x1W
Section 6 - Page 11
m
Mid - Year Report
Instrumentation Maintenance:
A major goal of the Division for FY 1995.96 is the emphasis on the cammued development of the Computerized Maintenance Management I
System(CMMS)database and its requiem inventory items. Approximately 105%of the annual target for'Pwous of Equipment.Computerized'
has been achieved this quarter. Bemuse of the development of new facilities,our Inventory has Increased and thus exceeded initial Activity Trend
estimates in this category. Furthermore,efforts to complete the Inventory database required a shift in resources. The rapid expansion of this
database has resulted In a higher than anbapeted preventive maintenance backlog and lower preventive maintenance tasks completed. I
Corrective tasks completed are well wfihin targeted parematen. The Division has maintained a 19%vacenry rate in order to meet Me 10% L
reduction in the Joint Operating Expense budget. Additional Nations will be filled In the that quarter and allow us to focus on Improving the
preventive maintenance backlog as wall as provide supporting,comprehensive documentation to the CMMS database.
L
160.0 095-96 Budget 146.0 L
140.0 M6 Months Ended
120.0 96.4 95.0 101.3
100.0 75.0 L
80.0 80.0 65.0
00.0
37.5 33.7
40.0
20.0 17.0 12.0 7.0 law
Plavppya OMlacha Prevenlva nethe Pleces of Compumdmd
Mal mMOM Task, Mob m Maintenance MaiC r�ienance Equipment Premiums
CsrrlPlllld Talk, Backog in Compamr Mundane.
x100 compawil Xto Daww"X 100 Instructions X 100
V
L
r
L
L
I !
Li
II
V
L'
Section 6 -Page 12
Activity Trends
Plant Operations:
_ Act"trends for the firsts&months of f 1995-96 are generally"eking as expected when eompared against 1995-96 annual
estimates. Actual expenditures for chemicals are below annual trends as are plant operations cast(per MGD). Lower per unit
costs for caustic soda and hydrogen peroxide were achieved by price negotiations with veiMors. Actual plant operation division cart
of$22D per million gallons is approximately 17%below the annual estimate of$265 per million gallons. Budget savings have been
e realized through the aforementionetl unit casts on chemicals and staff vacancies which resulted in labor savings.
90.0 64.0
m 600 74 O9&96 Budget
06 Months Ended
70.0
re 60.0 $54.3 -
50.0
41.6 43.3 41.0
r 40.0 39
- 30.0 2.9723.E "4 $26.520.0
10.0
0.0 Influent Flow In Ene y Dsaoen kW 100 Chemical
Tens of Millions Production Costs Division Cost
in Pounds per Plant One Plant Two X 100,000 Per Million Gallons
Of Gallons Million Gallons X 10
Per Day x 100
Section 6 - Page 13
r
Mid - Year Report
u
Environmental Management., `
The Oman Monitoring Baseline Program is a lum"i ce contract wont$1.48 million that extends into FY 1996-97 and will not be
fully expended until mat bmo. Charges urnalmul during the first se,months total E128,000. The target number of field samples V
collected during me year for the baseline Ocean Monitoring Program(OMP)is 1284 samples of"ch 1057(82%)wem consoled
during the first su months of me fiscal year. Typically,the bulk of collection Is accomplished In midsummer,wim remaining
samplescollemidthroughoutthe year. Each year the Districts conmbute funds to me Southern Califotua Coastal Water Research V
Project(SCCWRP)under a joint-powers agreement and expand addlional funds far OMP special studies. One of me epvdal
studies conducted by Emlronmmbil Management Is the mammar¢atlon of water quality wdhln Our study area uM¢Ing a fuad grid
of 32 stations. Water qualdy samples taken are an target.
V
400.0 3"
350.0 L
095-96 Budget $310.0
300.0 86 Months Ended
L
250.0 E245.0
200.0 L
173
$148.6
150.0 128A 1
105.7 V
100.0
SeeE487 E531
j$128
.0
Over SCCWRP Joint (keen Monitoring I
Monte Powers Agreement Special Studies Water QualityVi
Oman Monitoring Samples Taken
Baselinro Program ring Conmbution Cosl
X 10,000 X 1,000 X 1.000
16j
Li
L
I
Yrl
J
Section 6 - Page 14
II
Li
Activity Trends
Environmental Sciences Laboratory.
The Activity Trends noted In the FY 1995-96 Budget do not adequately quantify the duties and responsibilities of the Environmental
Sciences Laboratory(ESL). As a result,we are modifying our reporting to better reflect lab operations. The information below
depicts the actual number of analyses(through November) to be completed divided by the estimated number of analyses. Results
greater than one Indicate the lab has performed more than initial estimates while numbers below one indicate performance less than
estimates. Based on the data.75%(6 of 8)of the analyses completed are at or above projections.
1.2
_ 1
•NPDES INFIEFF
0.8 usourca control
a opponents Control
S ■Bbeollds
_ 0.6 ■Marine Monitoring
■Special Projects
DAIr
_ q 0.4
138u
n$' OSurt Zona
0.2
0
Samples
Source Control:
The new and renewed pemnit Issuance activlry,Is 69%of the six month estimate due to holidays and the scheduling of the permit
renewals which are lower during the first half of every fiscal year. The routine sampling and inspection of facilities are 92%of the
benchmark and are well within the expected trend. The downstream surveillance and Strike Force activities exceed the estimate by
nearly 25%tlue to the increased need for further investigation of illegal dischargers. Enforcement actions are 88%of the activity
trend benchmark due to fewer violations during the first six months. Remaining activity trends portrayed are within the expected
range of variabilky.
300.0 095.96 Budget 266.8
_ 2500 E6 Months Ended
192.0
200.0 163.6
150.0 12.1 116
100.0 6.6 75.3 76.0
54.5
60.0 42026.1 33.6 24.016.6
ass
0.0
Nawend Routine Sampling and Downstream Enforcement ant ppromarent Pnmihee. Rofsmaan
Renewed IneDetlianof Actions Enlorce al ofsmell
6urveillanms, Pmpnm
� PermiAeO and Nory MminleVaaw &General Ovanary
Issued Stoke Form Reports
a6ued mm,aaa OaNaryaR %10 Orders DOireapontlenm DisfJlOrya(6
zm zto
r
Section 6 - Page 15
Mid - Year Report
Engineering Administration:
Further review of the FV 199596 Budget Activity trends resulted in additional quantification of activities. The original Capital
Outlay Revolving Fund(CORF)forecast was$33.5 million of which$27.4 million was the direct responsibility of the Engineering
Department. This$27.4 million budget has now been revised to$19 million through June 30, 1996 due to several factors. The
primary factor is that several projects have been delayed including the primary rehabilitation projects and the Plant 2 Maintenance
Building. The Plant 2 Warehouse has been delayed indefinitely,and budgets for some projects have been revised downward to
more accurately reflect estimates of construction costs. These project delays have impacted the first six-months results whereby
we have expended 26%of the revised budget,to date.
30 T $27.4
25 }
20 i
095-96 Budget
5
■9S96 Projected .
06 Months Ended
10 }
1 $4.9
5
0
C.O.R.F.Expenditures
(In millions)
Design Engineering:
Further review of the Design Engineering functions is resulting In modfication of the FY 1995-96 Activity Trend information as
reflected below. The number of connection pannfls issued as well as number of design submittals reviewed represents fluctuating
workload that may not hold to predictable quarterly patterns. Number of wnnection permits Issued exceed six month estimates
while submittals reviewed am behind six month estimates. Most Capital Outlay Revolving Fund(CORF)projects will be bid late this
fiscal year because budget uncertainties delayed establishing pralines and finalization of bid documents. Similarly,Collection
Projects(by individual District)were delayed as well.
120
105.0
100
095-96 Budget
e0
■6 Months
60 Ended
40 35.0
40 ..
20 16
2 2 0
0 Ei
No.of Connection No.of Submittals Budgeted CORF Budgeted
Permits Issued Reviewed Projects Bid Collection
X 10 Projects Bid
Section 6 - Page 16
® Activity Trends
Engineering Planning
Further review of the FY 199546 Budget Activity trends resulted in additional quantification of activitles. The development of the Strategic
® Plan was assigned to the Engineering Planning Division In July, 1995.During the that six months,the components of the plan were developed
and the ground work lab for phase Implementation. A scope of work and schedule were adopted and a target data of 1196 act for completion
of the new Strategic Plan. Phase I Is underway and Includes three projects:the rehabilitation of our existing ocean outfall,a study on
e� hydraulic requirements,and a study to determine the most equitable capital and user charge system. The Board of Directors authorized
issuance of Requests for Proposals and it is expected that a Professional Services Agreement will be approved in the third quarter.
IS 199b-
lee fXe rm rrve
I I �
i
r � e
r
r
1
m mm elm m elm can
mm e® ese mm env oav
Construction Management
The amount budgeted for CORP engineering construction pmects In the first six months Is low compared to the FY 1995-96 budget, This was
m due to the uncertainty surrounding the County bankruptcy and the uhimate delay of projects. Our change orders am well below annual
estimates due to aforementioned project delays as well as improved project planning. In particular,once change order resulted in a not
$297,500 in our favor.
G $20.0 $16.9
095-96 Budget
86 Months Ended
m $15.0
$10.0
m 50%
$5.0 $3.1
.2%
E.0
CORF Dollar Amountal
s Construction Change Orders as
Projects %of Construction Contract
Section 6 - Page 17
L
L
L
Ir
11
L+
L
V
This page was intentionally left blank I
u
V
u
L.i
L
II
U
Section 6 -Page 18
i
u
Project Tracking
Districts-Wide Measurement Tracking
98 Measurement Projects
60 —
50
40
m o Em
@ 30
E �
m z 12
20 —g 2 —
5 4
10
0
Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On HDid Canceled
As part of the fiscal year 1995-96 budget process, performance measurement projects were
established for all departments/divisions within the organization. The chart above shows a status
summary, as of the end of the first quarter, of all the performance measurement projects approved in
_✓ the 1995-96 budget document.
The following pages present a status of each departments/divisions performance measures as of the
r end of the first quarter.
Section 7 - Page 1
Mid - Year Report
L
Executive Management
9 Measurement Projects L
9 L
B
7 L.
B
kd
3
2 L
i
0 i L
Ahead On Track Done Behind On Hold
i
t/
Measurement This %Complete Status Start End
Complete Consolidation Study. 85% On Track 711/95 - L
Improve management skills of managers and supervisors. 50% On Track 711/95 -
SuppodBoardsconslderationofcommBeestructurechange. 100% Done 711/95 12/31/95
Represent Distrcts'interests in Orange County bankruptcy. 85% On Track 711/95 -
Ir
Improve agency communication. 50% On Track 7/1/95 -
Direct work on Districts'Strategic Plan. 20% On Track 7/1/95 -
Createclimatethatpromoteschange. 50% On Track 711/95 - 6w
Establish clear goals for the departments and all subordinate units. 100% Done 711/95 12/31/95
Renew NPDES ocean discharge permit. 50% On Track 7/1/95 -
V
LI
I
L
Section 7 - Page 2
L1
Project Tracking
Board Secretary
2 Measurement Projects
<a 2
8E
8 C 1
E �z'
sr 0
EI.
Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled
.e Measurement Tltte %Complete Status Stan End
Streamline procedures for pmpanng agenda and minutes. 50% On Track 711/95
Provide regular updates of Director Info.to mgmt.and Committee sea. 50% On Track 7/1/95 -
Communications
4 Measurement Projects
yA 4
m m 3
Eel
E I
0
Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled
Measurement Title %Complete Status Stan End
Establish and organize Communications Office. 95% On Track 711195 -
ss
Define Communka0ona Office Mission 8 develop work plan. 100% Done 7/1I95 12131195
Prepare Communications Office,Procedures Manual. 0% On Hold 711/95 -
m Develop a biannual publication for public officials and comm.leaders. 0% On Hold 12/31/09 -
Section 7 - Page 3
U
Mid - Year Report
Finance Administration
4 Measurement Projects
L�
r
4
u c 3
E 2 6d
E
z ° 1
f
0 Id
Ahead On Tmok Done Behind Not Staled On Hold Canceled
Measurement Thus %Complete Stetus Start End N
Replace variable rate borrowing am arkefing agent to reduce costs. 100% Done 7/1/95 12/31/95
Complete implementation of treasury management lunpions. 100% Done 711/95 12/31/95 Yrl
Prevlde sale,lquid and pmduchwo cash and investment program. 100% Done 1/ins SKJO/95
Improve comprehensive budget process staded in 199495. 30% On Track 7/195 5 [W95
L
Accounting
3 Measurement Projects
r
3
di
`o 0 2 -
E
a
i 'm 1
� r
0
Mead On Track Done Behind Net Shaded On Hold Canted
r
Measummant Title %Complete status Start End
Overuse installation of a new Integrated Financial Into.System. 20% On Track 711/95 121J1/95
r
Develop Dislnds'-wide Finance policy 8 plocetlure manual. 20% On Track 7/1/95 4rl0/95
Develop DismCs'-wide mmpmhensive budget manual. 50% On Tmck 7/1/95 12/31/95
r
r
U
Section 7 - Page 4
u
�. Project Tracking
Purchasing & Warehousing
4 Measurement Projects
4
u a 3
E5
z R 1
s
o
Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled
mr Measurement Title %Complete Status Stan End
Compete revision of bidders list applic.to fie to commodity code listing. 85% On Track 7/1195 1/31/96
Establish annual contracts to reduce need for in-house inventory. 10% On Track 7/1/95 3/31M
Establish ABC analysis for classifying and analyzing inventory. 80% On Track 1/1/95 3131196
Develop policy on removal of misc.low cost hardware from inventory. 10% Behind 711195 12/31/95
Information Technology Administration
4 Measurement Projects
4
d `o 3
E @! 2
ae s @ 1
E
0
Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled
wa Measuremerk Title %Complete Status Stan End
Develop Information Systems Master Plan 0% Behind 711195 -
DevelopPerformanceMeasurementsurveyforlTDepartmentusers. 0% Behind 7/1195 -
Obtainadequateworkingspace for IT Department stall. 5% On Track 7A/95 -
eb Create formal Policies and Procedures Manual for IT Department. 0% Net Started 711195 -
rn
Section 7 - Page 5
Ii,
Mid - Year Report L
Hardware Support
3 Measurement Projects L
L
3
JI
`o p
L
E ' 1
z' m
B L
Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled
Measurement Title %Complete Status Start End
Install auxiliary PBX for Plant 2 to provide added telephone capabilities. 100% Done 711/95 12/31/95
Establish annual contracts to reduce need for in-house hrverdory. 75% Behind 711/95 1131/96 iy
Establish ABC analysis for classifying and analyzing Inventory. 0% Not Started 1/1/95 6130/96
L
Software & Plant Automation L
4 Measurement Projects
LJ
4
`oc 3 1bI I
E �
0 '
Ahead On Tuna Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled
J
Measurement Title %Complain Status Start End
Provide software support for installation of new FIS. 0% Not Started 7/1195 -
ReplacePlanlAutomationSyslem at Plant with new tachnology. 33% On Track 7/1/95 3/37/96
Install 0istricts-wide integrated network. 0% Not Stoned 711195 6/30196
6rl
J
L
Section 7 - Page 6
LJ
Project Tracking
yr
Human Resources Administration
3 Measurement Projects
m s 3
o
t 1
� m
f 0
Ahead On Tral Done Behind Not Stoned On Hold Canceled
Measurement This %complete Status start End
ve Develop and implement a Dstmb-wide training pmgram. 80% On Tri 7H/95 -
Develop and publish an Employee Handbook. 95% On Track 7/195 1I1S96
Improve Me quality of the Management Performance Review Program. 60% On Tmck T/M 5/3096
Human Resources & Training
3 Measurement Projects
3
de `o
2
B
i
Ahead On Tma Done Behind Not Slated On Hold Canceled
m Measurement not %Complete Statue start End
Develop and implement training opportunities and programs. 25% On Track 7I195 -
�, Improve and mfine management and professional staff evaluations. 75% On Track 711195 -
Conduct DSMcts♦vide attitude survey. 10D% Done 71195 -
a, Safety & Emergency Response
3 Measurement Projects
3
_ 8
o c 2
Zm
Ahead On T.& Done Behind Not Stanad On Hold Canceled
Measurement Ties %Complete Status Start End
o Develop safety training programs based on needs assessment 100% Done 711195 12/31/95
Develop and implement an integrated Emergency Response Plan. 10% On Track 7/195 -
Conduct industrial hygiene evaluations to determine nazertls. 0% On HOM 7/195
Section 7 - Page 7
U
Mid - Year Report
Maintenance Administration
3 Measurement Projects
i
] lad
Sg y E L I '
8
� � 1
z m
f
o J
Ahead On Tretic Dore Behind Not Started On Mold Canceled
Measumment Title %Complete status Start End L
Emphasize preventive maintenance tasks to reduce life Cycle coats. 85% On Thai 7/1195 -
Implement remaining Ernst S Young OW recommendations. 70% On Track 711195 -
CondnuebuildingMecomputerdatabasefortha CMMS. 85% On Track 1/1/95 - - L
U
Maintenance Scheduling
2 Measurement Projects J
z
om L
E L 1
�
� J
0
Ahead On Trail Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled
Mounurimend Title %Complete statue Start End
Identify optimum prevenive maintenance rates to reduce costs. 50% On Thai 711/95 - I
Benchmark equipment down tlme and establish acceptable lalpela. 50% On Trm* 711195 - V
u
- 4
Li
Project Tracking
Plant Maintenance
4 Measurement Projects
e 3
`o °m 2
� � 1
z m
f
0
Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Holed Canceled
m Measurement Title %complete Status Start End
Develop a valve exercising plaid maintenance program. 40% On Track 7/1195 6I30196
Develop a valve change plant maintenance program for critical areas. 15% Behind 7/1/95 6130196
m
Investigate applicable certification program for the various crags. 25% Behind 7/1/95 6130196
Develop an area assignment sys.to leverage field crow resources. 20% Behind 711195 6130196
Collection Facilities Maintenance
-� 4 Measurement Projects
4
3
n° @ 2
E
� m
d �
0
Ahead On Trade Dona Behind Not Slaked On Hold Canceled
Measurement Title %compMae Oil" Start End
Develop a CMMS data base for pump stations 8 a plant maint.listing. 70% Aheatl 711195 6130196
.e Continue to investigate ahemate chemicals for cheaper odor control. 60% On Track 711/95
Contract for line cleaning in some of the Disbids'Assmt.Districts. 60% On Trade 711/95 6130196
d Expand a root control program for District No.7 sewer system. 80% On Track 7/1/95 1/31/96
Section 7 -Page 9
Mid - Year Report
L
Mechanical Maintenance
3 Measurement Projects 1
V
.i
3
E
c > 2 _
E � 1
i c
d b
Ahead On Tmch Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled
Menauramonl Ti %complete Stall Start End V
Inhale linking program for mpelNve breakdowns of digester pumps. 50% On Trade 7/1/95 W30/96
Reduce costs by espani ing central generation engines maintenance. 75% Ahead 7/1195 -
Smrt cross training of personnel between palms. 50% On Track 7/1d15 -
Electrical Maintenance
4 Measurement Projects V
V
4
B _ 2 � -
E e
0
2 f 1 V
0 , i
Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled I
V
Measurement Tills, %complete Stable Start End
Complete CMMS database with regard to A/C systems. 95% Ahead 7H/95 M8/96
Develop predictive main.program for electdc equipment. 50% On Track 7/1/95 WW96 V
Develop aI Kilovolt meter and relay database. 60% Ahead 7/1195 6/90M
Privatize Central Generation Generator Maintenance to reduce costs. 100% Done 7/1195 11M/95 L/
V
y
Section 7 - Page 10
V
Project Tracking
Instrumentation Maintenance
3 Measurement Projects
u 3
9
e E 2
a
E ' 1
R
f
a 0
Ahead On Track Dona Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled
Measurement Title %Complete stable start End
Develop atlivity code within CMMS to tracit staff efforts. 2D% On Tmtl 711/95 MOW
privatize maintenance services for the 13 Influent Row means. 95% Mead 7/t/95 313196
Develop a charting process for recording preventative meirtt.backlog. SO% Mead 7/195 1r3196
Technical Services Administration
4 Measurement Projects
4
r � EE3
2
r � 7
0
Mead On Track Done BehiM Ne Started On Hold Canceled
Measurement Title %Complete stable Start End
_ Improve coverage of legislation 8 improve assmt.of compliance regs. 100% Done 7/1/95 12J31/95
Develop Impinmnt teams&begin nnplemenhng EY recommendations. 75% On Track 711195 590M
Develop compliance assmt.on discharges from treatment plants. 60% On Track 7/195 firso 6
e standardize biosolids inspection protocols S optimize staff usage. 75% On Track 7/195 313196
Section 7 - Page 11
L
Mid - Year Report
V
Environmental Management
3 Measurement Projects L
i
7 L
E 2
@ V
E 1
z
f �
Ahead On Tel Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled
Measurement Title %Complete Status Start End
Develop a 10-year synthesis of ocean moral program findings. 0% On Hold 711195 228/96
conduct a study of blotdckihtg fihers for the removal of pollutants. 65% On Track 7H/95 2128M
Prepare a 1995 Air Toxlp Emission Inventory Plan and Report. 20% On Track 7/1/95 22B/g8 Ll
L
Environmental Sciences Laboratory
3 Measurement Projects V
u
3
o1 , L
E
= � 1
� i inl
0
Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled
Its,
Measurement This %Complete statue Start End
Develop expended air analysis capablldies 30% On Track 7/1195 - 1
Reduce labor coats for metals analyses of"Weasel 10% Behind 711195 - L
Reduce labor cons for organic analyses ofwastewater. 10% Behind 711/5)5 -
V
U
L
Section 7 - Page 12
I !
v
® Project Tracking
Source Control
3 Measurement Projects
® 3
_ 9
`o E p
f
0
Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled
Measurement Title %Complete Status Start End
Evaluate the EPA Effluent Guidelines for regulating industrial users. 75% Ahead 7/1195 6130/96
Finalize the results of the non-industrial source sampling. 40% On Track 711/95 6130/96
Develop a program to regulate small-quantity dischargers. 50% On Track 711195 6rd0/96
a Operations Administration
3 Measurement Projects
3
ea Pl
`o
E 2
n° 1°
m i a 1
m
lE
0
Ahead On Track Dona Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled
Measurement Title %Complete Status Start End
m Reduced natural gas cost. NIA Ahead 711195 6/30196
Increase staff training. 70% Ahead 711195 6130/96
Improve employee communication. 100% Done 7/1195 6130196
m
Section 76 - Page 13
L
Mid - Year Report
II
V
Plant Operations
4 Measurement Projects L
a v
n
c c Z ! !
$ e V
E w 1 —_ _—
� m
s?
0 e
Ahead On Tract Done Behind Not Started On Hold Cancoletl
Measurement This %Complete States Start End y
Study staffing productivity per Ernst B Young review. 10% Not Started 71195 -
Reduceovedlme. WA On Track 7/195 -
Run Treatment plant cosWfecNey. WA On Tract 7/195 - logy
Reduce biosolids disposal cost. WA Behind 7095 -
Lai
Engineering Administration 6
2 Measurement Projects
1
61
z
a V
ofE
E
z' o Id
f
0
Ahead On Tra& Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled
Measurement Title %Complete Statue Start End
Moody Planning S Design organixation for E S Y recommendations 50% Behind 7/195 fir3096 jJ
Implement all 14 recommendations In CIP Repon 00% Behind 7/195 -
I✓
y�
ICY
Section 7 - Page 14
li
Project Tracking
Design Engineering
5 Measurement Projects
5
a a
'o
8 E 3
E 'm 2
i m 1
f
s 0
Ahead On Track Done Behind Not StaMtl On Hold Canceled
Measurement This %Complete status Sort End
Complete75%of mnn permits in 1day,90%in 3 days, 100%in 5 WA On Tack 7/195 saom
Design facilities which satisfy customer NIA On Tack 7/195 6/30M
Track and manage$33.5 million CORF project budget WA On T.& 711/95 6/301%
Comply with adopted Master Plan N/A On Track 7/195 6/7096
°f Improve submittal process on all new design projects N/A On Track 7/195 650/96
Engineering Planning
3 Measurement Projects
m 3
e
`o u 2
E
E � 1
E
0
Ahead On Track Done Behind Not Started On Hold Canceled
Measurement Title %Complains Status Start End
Comply with adopted Master Plan 50% On Track 711195 6130/96
Ttark and manage budget and schedule 50% On Track 7I195 6130/96
® Update'as-buift'information 50% On Tack 711M 6130M
Section 7 - Page 15
L
L
U
L
L+
u
U
u
This page was intentionally left blank
r
l..i
i
Ytl
Yi1
J
u
v
u
Section 7-Page 16
J I'
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of Orange County, California
Finance Department
Accounting Division
(7141 962-2411
mailing address:
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California
92 7 2 8-8 1 27
sheet address:
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
92708-7018
CSDOC 12195
SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
REGULAR MEETING
FEBRUARY 28, 1996 - 7:30 P.M.
RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 4
Minute excerpts have been received as set forth below. Pursuant to Regular Agenda Item
No. 4, it is appropriate to receive and file said excerpts:
(4) (a) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion to receive and file Resolution No. 96-8 from the
Board of Supervisors re change in appointment of active and alternate
representatives, as follows:
Districts Active Director Alternate Director
1, 2, 3, & 11 Roger R. Stanton William G. Steiner
5, 6, 7, 13 & 14 William G. Steiner Roger R. Stanton
(b) DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept resignation of Mayor Joseph
S. Barsa of the City of Villa Park from the Board of Directors of District No. 2, and
seating first and second alternates to the mayor, as follows:
District Active Director Alternate Director
2 Barry L. Denes Bob Bell
(c) Consideration of motion to receive and file any minute excerpts received
subsequent to preparation of supplemental agenda, if any
J:iwvooc=wGs A.W
uw OFFICES or
ROURBE, WOODRU77 & SPRADLIN
�e...BRDe •'"'O'm"�""�m'^�'"`�' >ew+wMc nle,Bae>000
KART E.enneD SUITE 7000 r eaMl:E n im ego->>e>
N' Lae 701 SOUTH PARKER STREET
BEFIT G.BUR16R
AM.E.uvwwWM ORAMOE. CALIFORNIA 020E8
GMW O. .MwNDTO.FICAwRnER'D DIRECT DIAL NUMBER
RI86L R.
IGI[[..KIF11[T
TNOYAe I.
.u.ea o. ROVRaG
KaBue K. [wn,+R.
o.wrt I. eNvc[ Q191559'2616
January 12, 1996
� Ta
TMowe L..00enNrr
VIA FACSIMILE AND U.S. MAIL
Mack J. Travers, Esq. Via Facsimile - (713) 492-8567
TRAVERS & TRAVERS
20501 Katy Freeway
Suite 124
Katy, Texas 77450
Mr. John A. Bannon, Jr., J.D. Via Facsimile - (713)961-9819
Underwriters Settlement Services
8 Greenway Plaza, Suite 400
Houston, TX 77046
Joe B. Cordil, Jr., Esq. Via Facsimile - (318) 798-7580
8660 Fern Avenue, Suite 100
Shreveport, LA 71105
Charles I. Eisner, Esq. Via Facsimile - (510) 639-1897
BOORNAZIAN, JENSEN & GARTHE
P.O. Box 12925
Oakland, CA 94604-2925
Mark Fall, Esq. Via Facsimile - (213)485-1200
LORD, BISSELL & BROOK
300 South Grand Ave., 8th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071-3200
Re: Costa, at al. v. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California
Dear Mssrs. and Madames:
This letter shall serve as our final demand for payment of attorneys' fees and costs
incurred in the above-entitled matter. As you may be aware, demands for payment have
been previously made upon Guardian Royal Exchange and Underwriters Settlement
Services, Inc., but they have gone unanswered. At this time, if we do not receive payment
of the outstanding fees and costs owed on behalf of our client, County Sanitation Districts
r
January 12, 1996
Page 2
of Orange County, we will have no choice but to proceed with litigation to enforce your
fiduciary duty to pay the costs of litigation and attorneys' fees. An action will be filed
pursuant to the contract, as well as, for breach of the covenant of good faith and fair
dealings.
Presently, outstanding attorneys' fees and costs which are due and payable to
Rourke, Woodruff& Spradlin in the amount of$28,734.05. All of these fees were incurred
post-tender. In addition, the amount of$48.844.21 is owed to County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County for fees previously paid by them. These fees are both post and pre-
tender fees.
In previous correspondence, dated July 10, 1995, Mr. Travers has questioned Rados
Company's insurers obligation for payment of pre-tender costs, citing policy language
addressing voluntary payments. Please be advised that this issue is specifically addressed
in the case of Fiorito v. Sup, Ct. (1990) 226 Cal. App. 3d 433, and the Court determined
that the standard policy provisions prohibiting an insured from making voluntary payments
or incurring expenses did not, as a matter of law, preclude the insured from recovering pre-
tendered defense costs. Certainly, when an insured is at risk of losing legal rights unless
it hires counsel to protect its interest, the payments to their attorney do not constitute
voluntary payments. In addition, the tender in this case was filed in a timely manner and
there was no prejudice to any insurer.
Therefore, in the absence of bad faith, there is no reason why an insurer would not
recognize their obligations to pay the entire fees and costs due and owing at this time both
to Rourke, Woodruff & Spradlin and the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,
California.
Furthermore, in Mr. Travers' most recent correspondence of July 10, 1995, he
alludes to the fact that the fees charged by Rourke, Woodruff & Spradlin somehow
exceeded the normal rate for defense insurance counsel. We provided him information
indicating that assertion was inaccurate. Regardless, the fees charged by Rourke,
Woodruff & Spradlin were agreed to when counsel was retained by Guardian Royal
Exchange Insurance Company to provide a defense for County Sanitation District of
Orange County. In fact, after having been provided months of billings detailing the attorney
fees in this case, on January 14, 1994, Mr. Floyd A. Wisner confirmed as follows: "Of
course, Guardian Royal will pay all future reasonable fees and expenses of your firm in
defending the County Sanitation District in this matter." Fees were paid without any
concern expressed for the rates charged until July 10, 1995. Obviously, these are simply
bad faith tactics to renege on an obligation owed to your insured, County Sanitation
Districts of Orange County.
2M7aoom
zaiso 1
January 12, 1996
Page 3
Enclosed with this letter you will find the most recent statements from June 30, 1995
to and including December 31, 1995. If we do not hear from you before 5:00 p.m, on
January 19, 1996, we will assume that you will continue to withhold payment in bad faith
and proceed to protect the interests of County Sanitation Districts with court intervention.
Cordially,
ROURKE, WOODRUFF & SPRADLIN
CRAIG G. F ROdNGTT
Enclosures
cc: Mr. D. F. McIntyre
Mr. G. G. Streed
Ms. P. Kyle
Thomas L. Woodruff, Esq.
203]-00000
23180_1
it I lEugNalea 8AWNA Date:30-Jan-96 007282
r UotlerRriters Settlement Services, Inc.
S,01m tAeeoam eaee4HAr rmrA� USS Cheek Number: 003197L
S Gem+ y pin Sure 400 �' S
HouvoRTX 71046 ]i ttSenO
Par to the
order of: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 548,844.21
THE EXACT SUM OF: •..48,844 DOLLARS and TI CENTS'..
FOR: REIMBURSEMENT OF LEGAL FEES INCURRED BY THE ORANGE
COUNTY.CALIFORNIA,SANITATION DISTRICTS a„yaw, t7.saaao
i
rw rau my.
11*00P2621" 1: L14001L501: 002300049i06�' nn
Payee Number : - - 0 FOR: REIMBURSEMENT OF LEGAL FEES INCURRED BY THE ORUE7282
COUNTY,CALIFORNIA,SANITATION DISTRICTS
USS Check Number : 003197 L
Policy Effective Date : 31-Mar-91
USS File Number : 391 MC180-058
Policy Number
Insured : RADOS, INC.
Amount Paid : S48,844.21
Incident Date : 01-Apr-91
1990
uo'r282
Underwriters Settlement Senlces, Inc
S Ge .Y Plaza Suite 400
Hou Tc= T 046
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
In e ARLWARREN&CO. Next Report Due: 3-96
Claims Management and Administration
250 TM(:iry Miw
Saito 400
Orangq CA 92669
Mail:P.O.0na 25190
Santa Ana.CA 92799 5190
(714)740-n99
eae,p714)740J992 February 28, 1996
FIRST REPORT - INVESTIGATION
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127
Attention: Penny Kyle
RE: Principal : County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County
D/Incident : 2-22-96
Claimants : Donna Anderson, at al.
Our File No. : Undetermined
Ladies and Gentlemen:
PREVIEW: These claims . result from a sewer backup
caused by a pump station failure which flooded
approximately seventeen homes in the Newport Beach
area.
PRINCIPAL: County Sanitation Districts of Orange
County.
DATE. TIME & PLACE: During the early morning hours on
February 22, 1996 along Harbor Island Drive, Bayside
Drive and Beacon Bay, Newport Beach, California.
FACTS IN BRIEF: It has been determined that a District
pump station shut down causing excess amounts of sewage
water to back up into the system causing approximately
36,000 gallons of sewage from three manholes to flow
into the storm drain system and into Newport Bay along
with approximately 5,000 gallons of sewage into homes
bordering the bay.
GOVERNMENT CODE COMPLIANCE: To date, we have not
received any official claims from any of the homeowners
but the claim forms are currently being distributed to
the effected homeowners.
^r
Page 2
CLAIMANT VERSIONS: The claimants were all consistent
in the fact that they either heard or smelled sewage
emulating from their bathroom either from their shower
stall, bathtub or commode.
DISTRICT VERSION: According to reports received from
the District, it was determined that the pump station
failed due to a mounting bracket support which had
corroded allowing the level sensor to break and cause
the pipe to fall and separate the air supply from the
pipe assembly. The wet well level bubbler system
sensors control the pumps which registered low water
levels in the wet well causing the pumps to cease
operation.
After reports to the City of Newport Beach from a
homeowner at approximately 3:00 A.M. , staff from the
City of Newport Beach Water Utilities Department
determined that the Bay Bridge Pump Station was not
functioning and they cut the gate and door padlocks and
made entrance into the station manually turning on the
PUMPS- The spill stopped shortly after the pumps were
started.
PREMISES: We have inspected fourteen out of the
seventeen homes that were effected. Several of the
homeowners indicated that their damages were minor and
they cleaned the area up themselves. We will outline
each respective homeowner and their damages in the
^Property Damage - Claimants" section.
PHOTOGRAPHS: Numerous photographs were taken of each
residence which will be mounted and labeled with our
next report.
PROPERTY DAMAGE - CLAIMANTS:
1. Donna and Larry Anderson: loll Bayside Drive,
Newport Beach, CA 92660, phone (714)760-1656.
The Anderson residence was by far and away the most
heavily damaged and most eloquently appointed home
that was effected by the sewage backup. The home
had interior damage to the master bedroom and
bathroom, living room and den area.
Page 3
The home had a total remodel approximately three
years ago at a cost of $200,000.00, according to
the homeowner. The homeowner states that the
interior redesign was done by a designer by the
name of Mr. Fari which took approximately nine
months to complete.
The home is currently without carpeting and
arrangements are being made to relocate the
claimants to another residence while the repairs
are being completed. We are in the process of
- locating a contractor which will do a partial
disassembling of the home so bacterial evaluation
can be made by Clayton Environmental Consultants.
Some personal property was damaged in the sewer
backup, including approximately forty pairs of
designer-type shoes owned by the claimant and
several articles of clothing owned by her husband.
We believe considerable negotiation will be
required to resolve this claim since there will be
numerous items of contention as we proceed through
the rebuilding process. We believe the main item
of contention will be the marble floors and marble-
lined shower stall which the claimant believes is
ruined as a result of the sewage backflow. We will
be attempting to obtain an expert's opinion as to
the likelihood of the marble being sanitized and
re-polished to its original condition.
Initial Reserve - $75, 000.00.
2 . Godelio Friedstadt: 1005 Bayside Drive, Newport
Beach, CA 92660, phone (714) 760-3906.
This home sustained moderate damage to the master
bedroom and bathroom. We noted no personal
property damage as a result of the backflow. The
home had a moderate grade of carpeting and the
owner is currently performing the repairs. They
will be submitting a claim within the very near
future.
Initial Reserve - $2, 500.00.
Page 4
3. Helene Winocura: 1013 Bayside Drive, Newport
Beach, CA 92660, phone (714)760-1609.
This residence sustained damage to the master
bedroom and master bath area. The claimant
indicated that she may replace the carpeting in the
living room and dining room due to the heavy
contamination they believe occurred when the
cleaning crews walked through the home to do their
repairs. The carpeting was approximately five
years old according to the homeowner and was of
very good grade. Also damaged were approximately
twelve pairs of ladies' shoes.
Initial Reserve - $7,500.00
4. William white: 1017 Bayside Drive, Newport Beach,
CA 92660, phone (714)720-1640.
This home sustained damage to the master bedroom
and bath along with the living room, den and wood
entry hall. The owners are residents of Hawaii
with this being a second home.
We met with the executive secretary for the owner,
Terry Magee. The carpeting in the home was four
months old having recently been replaced. It was a
moderate grade Berber throughout. There were
several damaged personal property items, including
some shoes and some boots which Ms. Magee indicated
cost $1, 100.00.
Initial Reserve - $6,500.00.
S. Unknown Owner: 1021 Bayside Drive, Newport Beach,
CA 92660.
We presented ourself at the owner's residence on
the day of the backup. We received no answer but
understand that the damage was confined to the
bathroom fixtures only. We have not received a
phone call from the owner of the property.
Initial Reserve - $500.00.
Page 5
6. Don Madison: 973 Bayside Drive, Newport Beach, CA
92660.
We met with the owner who indicated that he had
awoken early that morning and saw the sewage water
entering his bathtub. He was able to effectively
scoop out the contaminated water with a bucket and
drained it to the outside of his residence. He had
no damages as a result of this backup.
Initial Reserve - Zero.
7 . Ms. Barker: 979 Bayside Drive, Newport Beach, CA
92660, phone (714) 720-9571.
This claimant sustained minor damage to her
bathroom and master bedroom. The master bedroom
carpet consisted of a white shaggy carpet over a
custom wood floor. The wood floor did not appear
to be damaged upon our inspection. There was no
personal property damaged as a result of this
backup.
Initial Reserve - $2,500.00.
S. Paulene Johnston: 981 Bayside Drive, Newport
Beach, CA 92660, phone (714) 640-1819.
This home sustained a backup into the master
bedroom and bathroom along with minor penetration
into the living room, den and entryway. The home
had a high grade blue carpeting which may be
difficult to match in the other rooms. The
flooring in the den and entry hall consisted of
wood floors which were effected by the backup. The
carpeting in the home was approximately six years
old and was in very good condition.
Also damaged were two Oriental rugs which the home
indicated that she will attempt to salvage since
they were bought overseas. There may be some
furniture touch-up to two pieces of furniture in
the master bedroom.
Initial Reserve - $10,000. 00.
Page 6
9. Dr. Manchester: 985 Bayside Drive, Newport Beach,
CA 92660, phone (714)675-8647 and (714)645-3040.
The owner of this residence was not available
during our inspection. The cleanup crew was there
attending to the backup after they were given a key
from a neighbor.
The master bedroom and bathroom were effected by
the backup along with seepage from the master
bedroom to the living room. The carpeting
consisted of a high grade Berber carpet which
appeared to be relatively new. There were also
several pieces of furniture which were soaked with
sewage water.
Initial Reserve - $5,000.00.
10. Unknown Owner: 989 Bayside Drive, Newport Beach,
CA 92660.
We contacted this residence and there was no one
home on the day of the backup. We have not heard
anything from this particular homeowner.
Initial Reserve - $2,500.00.
11. Mr. and Mrs. Turner: 409 Harbor Island Drive,
Newport Beach, CA 92660, phone (714)675-5582.
This private residence sustained damage to a living
room, hall, master bedroom, a second bedroom and a
rear storage room. The home was carpeted with a
medium to low grade cut-pile carpeting that was
approximately ten years old according to the
homeowner.
Most of the furniture in the residence looked like
it was not effected by the water backup. Most of
the furnishings in the home were older and of
relatively marginal quality.
Initial Reserve - $5,000.00.
12. J.D. Lincoln: 415 Harbor Island Drive, Newport
Beach, CA 92660.
t
Page 7
We met with the owner who had moderate damage to
two bedrooms and two bathrooms. The home had an
average quality carpet which looked several years
old. The owner was extremely cooperative during
our visit.
initial Reserve - $2,500.00.
13. Unknown Owner: 421 Harbor Island Drive, Newport
Beach, CA 92660.
We spoke to this owner from a distance who
indicated that only the bathroom was effected by
the backup and she cleaned it up herself. We did
not inspect the residence since we were advised
that no claim would be filed.
Initial Reserve - Zero.
14. Dr. Martin Litke: 427 Harbor Island Drive, Newport
Beach, CA 92660.
This home had very minor damage to the bathroom and
hall only. A cleanup crew was conducting the work
upon our inspection.
Initial Reserve - $1, 500.00.
15. Unknown Owner: 433 Harbor Island Drive, Newport
Beach, CA 92660.
We attempted to make contact with the owner but
they were not there on the day of the backup. We
understand from the Fire Department that the
damages were reserved to the outside of the
residence only.
Initial Reserve - $500.00.
16. Alex Fishman: 439 Harbor Island Drive, Newport
Beach, CA 92660, phone (714) 675-2393 and (310)
273-2373.
This home is a weekend-only home for the resident.
The home sustained moderate damage to the master
bedroom and bath along with two other side bedrooms
and two other side bathrooms.
Page 8
The carpet consisted of a high grade wool Berber
carpeting in two of the bedrooms and a moderate
grade cut-pile carpeting in the master bedroom.
There were several throw rugs which were damaged
but no other personal property. The owner was
extremely cooperative during our visit.
Initial Reserve - $5,000.00.
17. R.C. Fuller: 443 Harbor Island Drive, Newport
Beach, CA 92660.
There was no one home upon our visit with a note to
contact the owner should the Fire Department
require any other inspection of the property. We
are attempting to contact the owner to determine
the extent of damage.
Initial Reserve - $2,500.00.
18. Harry Crowell: 554 Harbor Island Drive, Newport
Beach, CA 92660, phone (714)263-3340.
This home was approximately 100 yards away from the
other residences which were effected. The backup
originated from the laundry room drain and emulated
to the living room, kitchen and hallway. The home
had a very high quality carpeting that was two
years old along with a high quality linoleum
flooring in the kitchen.
One piece of furniture appeared to be effected by
the backup but the three couches in the living room
were untouched. There was some penetration on the
lower edges of some oak wall units. They appeared
to need minor disinfection and cleaning.
World Restoration was doing the restoration work to
this residence.
Initial Reserve - $7,500.00.
19. Unknown owner: 44 Beacon Bay, Newport Beach, CA
92660.
l
Page 9
We attempted to make contact with the owner who was
not there. We understand that the only damages to
this residence consisted of streaks to the shower
wall and tub area.
Initial Reserve - $500.00.
LIABILITY EVALUATION: With the facts in our
possession, we believe this to be a liability situation
toward the Orange County Sanitation Districts at this
time.
We also acknowledge that there may be contributory
negligence on the property manager of the condominium
complex located on Bayside Drive since a pumping
station which was on the residence was not being
maintained properly and may have alleviated the backup
had it been working properly. Further investigation is
being performed for any potential subrogation at a
later time.
We also believe that several of the homes may have had
backflow valves which were not working properly on the
day in question. Further investigation may be required
to determine comparative negligence on these homes.
WORK TO BE COMPLETED: Await filing of claims from the
homeowners and attempt resolution of each claim
accordingly.
COMMENTS: Our work on this matter continues and our
further report will follow in several weeks.
Very truly yours,
CARL WARREN & CO.
Edward Garbo lw'/
EG:mcw
�.F7.lL Gn e19 G
The News Pipe liine
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
"Protecting the Public Health and Environment Through Excellence in Wastewater Systems"
Volume 3,No.4 February 28,1996
Values Committee Publishes Other comments stressed that we must keep
communication lines open across all departments,and
Questionnaire Results that we must show pride and concern for each
The Values Committee Working Group, consisting department, not just for isolated divisions or
of Chuck Lee, Simon Watson and Jeff Reed, has individuals. It is critical that we all set good examples,
published the results of the Values Committee and that discipline is used only after an objective and
questionnaire that addressed the issues of increasing honest evaluation has revealed a violation of our
trust and confidence, removing hidden agendas and terms, conditions, rules or regulations of employment.
eliminating retaliation. Here's their report: We found that, overall, opinions were in the middle
of the road, but there still seems to be some core
The members of the Values Committee want to problems in many departments. Examples include
thank everyone who took the time to respond to the lack of managerial and supervisory support,
questionnaire, especially those who made written favoritism, incompetency, lack of promotion
comments.Taking an active interest, and participating opportunities, "political correctness" instead of good
in the work environment are among the most essential judgment, lack of accountability at all levels, and little
and meaningful things employees contribute to the recognition for "a job well done." There was also a
success of an organization. concern that management often does not treat and
The first thing we did was tally the employee represent employees fairly and honestly.
responses to questions that contained the following The survey indicated that there is support for
selections: Never, Rarely, Sometimes, Most of the change within the organization. Employees said that
Time, and Always. Then, in the interest of they want to work in an environment where they can
confidentiality, we categorized the written comments be confident that trust and honesty are not only values
into a general set of responses. These responses are but also realities. Above-board and honest
summarized in this report and will be posted soon on communication was the key factor stressed in the
the bulletin boards for your review. Please feel free to responses. If we are going to be a responsible
provide additional feedback or ask questions of the organization that embraces a recognized set of core
Values Committee members about this information. values, then teamwork is essential for us to attain our
The Values Committee intends to do a follow-up-in common goals and mission.
approximately six months. Another predominant response was that trust and
In general, the people who responded to the confidence in our work environment can only evolve
survey represent all levels and all departments. Some and survive when all employees, irrespective of their
people said that they have experienced problems with position or level of authority, accept that we all must
trust and confidence, hidden agendas and retaliation. identify, practice and preserve the values and
However, there was a general feeling that progress commitments that encompass the"Guiding Principles"
has been made to minimize such incidents. that reflect our core values. (Note: Our Guiding
At the Feb. 15 meeting of the Values Committee, Principles were just finalized and will be formally
our working group recommended that we ask the presented to employees in the next few weeks.)
Human Resources and Training Division and the It is of utmost importance that our organizational
Communications Division to develop and provide polices reflect these principles and that all of us
managerial, supervisory and lead-person training to adhere to them. Successful change can only come
improve communication skills to specifically address about through continuous training and consistent
these problems. direction in policy. Each individual must be
Many people said that progress can and is being accountable for how well we succeed in this
made toward increasing trust and confidence in the endeavor. First-line supervisors must clearly identify
workplace. However, if it is to continue, managers and issues that come up in the workplace and inform
supervisors must communicate honestly and executive management so that it can respond quickly
ethically to all their employees. Furthermore, and appropriately.
managers and supervisors must keep all employees Most of all, competent leadership is essential to
informed about issues facing our organization. identify and implement policies and programs that
1
reflect this dedication.These policies must support our everyone's part to make it happen. We accomplished
common purpose and mission to ensure the continued this feat by getting the cooperation of workers on 12- i
excellence of the Districts as an organization. hour shifts, through staffs willingness to plan their ;
vacation schedules in advance, by reducing minimum `
12-hour Shift Survey staffing levels, by using the Districts' personal leave
The Values Committee would like to thank buy-back policy, and because of everyone's
everyone who has completed and fumed in their 12- willingness to minimize unscheduled leave.
hour-shift survey. If you haven't turned in your 1994, due to the lack of same of the above
survey yet, please do so as soon as possible. If you factors, one hour of overtime was required for every
didn't get one to till out, contact Greg Chesebro, ext. three hours one hour overtime for every time off. In 7.5 hours of time off. Here
of 5, that ratio changed to
5922, Moira Sullivan, ext. 2058, or Matt Eddy, ext.
3058. Preliminary results from the replies we have are the numbers:
received so far have been distributed to everyone who In 1994,the Plant No.2 of leave staff asked for
took the survey. and received of overtime
hours of leave which required
6,252 hours of overtime to cover. In 1995, staff
received 14,870 hours ofleave which required only
2,001 hours of overtime. Our goal for 1996 is to
Joint Boards Approve
reduce this number even further.
Landfill Acquisition Bid
At a special meeting on Feb. 14, the Districts' CWEA Industrial and
Joint Boards of Directors voted to submit an offer Hazardous Waste Conference
to the county that would transfer the ownership
and operation of the Orange County solid waste Associate Engineer III Jane Tran from the Source
management system to a new sanitation district. If Control Division made a presentation titled,
the offer is approved by the Orange County Board "Permitting Issues for Metal Finishing and
of Supervisors and all term-sheet conditions are Electroplating Category Dischargers—What to Look for
agreed upon, a new sanitation district board would and What's Ahead" at the 23rd California Water
Environment Association (CWEA)
be created comprising a representative from each Industrial and Hazardous Waste
city or sanitary district in the county, and a Conference in Los Angeles on Feb.
member of the Board of Supervisors. 13. Jane's talk was part of day-long
The funds for the acquisition—$300 million over session on industrial operator training
20 years — would probably come from a capital for wastewater pretreatment systems.
financing program that would be secured by Jane focused on how we
revenues generated by the waste management determine if a company should be in
system. No CSDOC funds will be used. the metal finishing or electroplating category, and the
Before the deal can become final, Orange difference between "category" and "permitted"
County cities must commit to bringing at least 90 discharge limits. She talked about the different types
percent of the solid waste generated in the county of permit limits (mass and concentration), self
to the system for the next 20 years. This will monitoring and notification requirements for
provide the long-term stability upon which the new permittees, the importance of proper record keeping
district can make economic projections and future and reporting, and different types of permit conditions.
debt payments. The Board of Supervisors must She concluded by discussing the overall impact of
also agree to the proposed terms and conditions the new proposed EPA Metal Products and Machinery
of the transfer. (MP&M)category of dischargers on specific industries
The term sheet is currently under review by the in our service area, typical MP&M unit operations, and
County Chief Administrative Officer Jan Mittemi he the proposed effluent limitations for this category.
ty Efficient, well-operated industrial wastewater
Once she has completed her review, she will forward pretreatment plants are the key to our successful
her recommendations to the Board of Supervisors. source control program. Through efforts like
We'll keep you apprised of developments. participating at the CWEA conference, and by keeping
up on the most recent changes in the regulatory
Overtime Reduced at Plant No. 2 arena, the Districts' Source Control Division is able to
By Doug Cook help industries meet their permit limits, which in turn
I'm happy to report that the Plant No. 2 Operations helps us maintain the viability of our environmental
was able to reduce overtime at Plant No. 2 by 68% in protection programs.
1995 from 1994. It really took a group effort on
2
Get Ready for Performance Tunnicliff and Milled
Management Training! Pass PE Exam
By Dawn McKinley Congratulations to Dan �i �ORIQ
Performance Management Tunnleliff of the Safety and
2 training for Division managers, Emergency Response Division
executive staff, supervisors and Kathleen Millea of the
and professionals will be held Operations Division who were
from Apr. 29 through May 7. just notified that they passed the Professional Engineer
Managers and supervisors will (PE) exam and have become professional civil
attend one-day training engineers. Added congratulations go to Intern
sessions from April 29 through May 2, and members Anthony Howard who just learned that he passed the
of the professional group will have half-day sessions Engineer in Training (EIT) exam.
on May 5, 6 and 7. All affected employees will be To become a registered engineer you have to be
receiving more details by the end March. an EIT, work for three years under a registered
Training will cover the fundamentals of engineer, and of course, you have to pass the PE
performance management including the performance exam.
management process, the new performance review
forms, the new automated performance management Orange County Freeway
system, techniques on how to evaluate employee Service Patrol
performance and communicate desired performance Did you know that a special
results, and methods for establishing, evaluating and - team of tow trucks is traveling on
rating performance objectives and developing selected Orange County
performance measures. freeways during commuter hours
Training is mandatory, so mark your calendars to assist drivers when their cars
now! Please contact Dawn McKinley, ext. 2108 if you s break down?The program is part
have any questions. of an overall plan to improve
transportation throughout Orange
More Babies in the News!! County and keep the freeways moving. The program
Congratulations to Arnold is being funded by the State of California and the
44�1and JIII Chavez on the birth of Orange County Transportation Authority. The"FREE"
their first child, a baby girl Freeway Service Patrol operates Monday through
named Lauren Elizabeth, who Friday, 5:30 a.m. to 9:30 a.m. and 3 p.m. to 7 p.m. on
joined the Chavez household at most freeways.
8:37 a.m. on Feb. 19. Lauren If you get stuck on the freeway because your car
weighed 6 Ibs, 10 oz, and was stops running, the Freeway Patrol can:
19%inches long. Arnold is a Regulatory Specialist in a Offer you a gallon of gas
the Technical Services Support Group and Jill is a e Jump start your dead battery
Senior Clerk with the Design Engineering Division. a Refill your radiator and tape broken hoses
A special congratulations goes out to Norma and a Even change a flat tirel
Ricardo Leopando on the birth of their daughter If they can't get your car going, it will be towed free
Uses, who arrived on Feb. 15 at 11:15 a.m. Lissa of charge to a location approved by the California
weighed 7 Ibs, 5 oz and was 18 inches long. Norma Highway Patrol. Call (714) 724-2747 for more
is a Sr. Lab Analyst with the Technical Services information.
Department.
The reason that Lissa's birth is so special is that
even though the Leopando's really wanted a girl, h rcas Ted E. Hoffman Purchasing
they were told by Norma's doctor during her g
pregnancy that ultrasound test showed that she was Building Dedication
going to have another son. The Leopando's already All employees are invited to attend a ceremony
have two boys, ages 9 and 11. In fact she was so dedicating the Purchasing Building to the memory of
sure she was going to have another boy (and quite Ted. E. Hoffman, long-time Districts' Purchasing
happy as well), all the gifts at her shower were for a Manager who died suddenly last Nov. 11 of a heart
boy baby. attack. The Purchasing Building dedication ceremony
Imagine the Leopondo's surprise (not to mention will take place on Thursday, March 7, at 10 a.m.
the doctor's), when Lissa arrived! Mother and baby
are doing fine.
3
Daffodil Days Fundraiser District next door to Plant No. 1 to survey their
Lynn Elliott, the Districts' employees to see if together we can make it ,
contact person for the American worthwhile.On a side note, it seems that there was a `
AMERICAN Cancer Society's Daffodil Days misunderstanding by a few employees who took the
�2CCACNCER fundraiser says that we have survey. If a child-care service is ever offered, it would
already received over$200 worth not be a benefit but would be an employee-sponsored
of orders during the first week of program.
the campaign. All orders must be in to Lynn no later
than this Friday, March 1. Make all checks payable to How to Plan An
the American Cancer Society. Call Lynn, ext. 5079,
if you have any questions. Effective Presentation
Here's an invitation to jump at the
Hockey Game Post Script opportunity to attend the Graphic Users
By Flo Gerdes Group (GUG) meeting on Leap Year
A total of 44 employees, Day, Feb. 29, from 2 to 3 p.m. in the
friends and family had a great Board Room. Learn how to plan an
�— time at the Arrowhead Pond effective presentation. Learn how
on Jan. 31 watching the Graphic Services can help you become
rr~• Mighty Ducks of Anaheim the great communicator you arel
Q beat the first place Colorado
Avalanche.
Miriam Loyo, Division p Service Awards Q
3580, won a T-shirt, cap and The following employees celebrated their service
hockey puck in the group
drawing. But Bill Aldridge, Division 2220, came away anniversaries during the last pay period.
the big winner, being the only person in the sell-out Congratulations!
crowd selected to win a watch and a hockey stick Ten Years
autographed by the entire Mighty Ducks team. He also Cesar Sandulescu Collections Inspection
won tickets to the final home game of the season Five Years
where he will be one of 39lucky people who will have Bob Ortega Warehouse
a chance at winning a 1996 Toyotal Dean Yokoyama Operations
Bill hadn't originally planned on attending the *New Employees*
game, but got his tickets earlier that day from Director The following new employee joined the agency
of Operations Bob Ooten who had a conflict that
evening. Bob had gotten his tickets from Assistant since the last pay period. Welcome to the Districts!
• SonjaKlick—Intern
General Manager for Operations Blake Anderson a Environmental Management
week or so before the game after Blake discovered
that he too couldn't go to the game. *Promotions*
How about if we plan on going to another Mighty Congratulations to the following employees who
Ducks game next year? were promoted during the last pay period.
Michelle Fitzgerald
From: Assoc. Engineer II 3410
Maintenance News To: Assoc. Engineer III 3410
The recently completed Customer Questionnaires Chuck Windsor
sent out from the Maintenance Department have been From: Senior Engineer 3720
received and the results are being tallied. Ed Hodges TO: Engineering Supervisor 3720
would like to thank everyone who participated for their
valuable input. As soon as we have the results, we'll
publish them in The News Pipeline. The News Pipeline
Marcin reports that the Districts'
Preliminary Child Care Survey resulted in a very The News Pipeline is published every payday by the
positive response. Though most respondents were in Communications civismn for the employees and Directors ofMe
favor of the idea of having a child care facility On-Site Orange County Sanitation Districts.The deadline for submitung
9 ty news items is ft Wednesdav before payday.Contributions are
or nearby, there are not enough children of Districts' weioomal
employees who would be enrolled full time to sponsor h such a facility.We've asked the Orange County Water Editor.........................'"'..'""'....""..""..""."".""""'rate`s`MCNeIry
4
DATE
PAID
1/24/96 1130196 2/7/96
➢i.i. DIFIRI=
Joint Operating Fund - 330,891.89 1,984.69 1,097,537.60
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 716,314.33 100.00 377,866.63
Joint Working Capital Fund - 508,946.57 0.00 183,218.02
Self-Funded Insurance Fonda - 3,511.49 8,582.81 63,272.44
OIAMiM NO. 1 - 92.60 0.00 443.50
DISTRICT Nn_ 1 - 1,3D5.61 0.00 5,033.49
OiSIRICI NO. 3 - 500,455.26 0.00 423,915.28
DISIRICT NO. 5 - 477.07 0.00 12,802.61
DISTRICT NO. 6 - 69.20 0.00 252.84
❑3RIRicr NO_ I - 312,659.59 0.00 62,180.89
DIRTRFCT NO. 11 - 10,463.03 0.00 195,154.05
DISTRICT NO. 13 - 3.40 0.00 0.00
Di9IRF[ NO. 14 - 764.81 0.00 17.05
DISTRICTS NO, 1 6 0 JOINT 0.00 0.00 0.00
DISTRICTS NO. 3 6 11 JOINT 875.00 0.00 DAD
DISTRICTS NO. 5 6 6 JOINT - 678.04 0.00 172,537.30
DISTRTCTB NO. 6 s ] JOINT - 213.30 0.00 2,258.68
DISTRICTS NO. T A 14 JOINT - 15.98 0.00 6,341.96
TOTALS 2,387,767.10 10,667.50 2,602,740.34
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0122/96 PAGE i
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 0124/96 POSTING DATE 01/24/96
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
149482 A-1 FENCE CO INC. $797.00 GATE REPAIR
149483 AG TECH COMPANY $50,243.52 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.ID-9-91
149464 ASL CONSULTING ENGINEERS $1,028.74 ATWOOD SUBTRUNK PLAN PREPARATION
149485 ASRANALYSIS $1,500.00 LAB SERVICES
149456 ATM AA,INC. $1,160.00 LAB SERVICES
149487 AT&T-MEGACOM SERVICE $5,453.96 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
149488 AT&T-MEGACOM SERVICE $2,903.40 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
149489 AT&T-CELLULAR CR&R $6.10 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
149490 ACORN CONSULTING S2,730.00 CONSULTING SERVICES
149491 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS,INC. S2,563.00 CONSTRUCTION P1-36-1
149492 AIR LIQUIDE AMERICA CORP. $1,247.69 SPECIALTY GASSES
149493 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $18,322.00 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.0.8-9A9
149494 ALADDIN HOUSE $350.45 WINDOW BLINDS
149495 AMERIDATA $1,280.82 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
149496 AMERICAN AIR FILTER,INC. $1.826.36 MECHANICAL PARTS
149497 AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION $86.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
149498 AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE $317.81 CHEMICALS
149499 APA EDUCATION TRUST $2.055.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING
149500 APCO VALVE&PRIMER CORP. $1.912.56 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
149501 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $3,420.60 NOTICES&ADS
149502 APPLE ONE $5.962.00 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
149503 ADS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $8,714.05 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
149504 AQUATIC BIOASSAY&CONSULTANTS $5.475.00 LABORATORY SERVICES
149505 ARROWHEAD ELECTRIC CORP. $416.21 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
1495DS ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE,INC. $931.20 TOXIC WASTE REMOVAL
149507 AMSA $425.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
149508 AURORA PUMP $37.00 PUMP PARTS
1495D9 RANDOLPH AUSTIN CO. $576.10 LAB SUPPLIES
149510 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $3.11M.66 PAYROLL SERVICES
149511 BFI MEDICAL WASTE SYSTEMS $46.05 WASTE DISPOSAL
149512 E S BABCOCK&SONS INC $1,140.00 LAB ANALYSIS
149513 BAKER INSTRUMENT CO $25,019.95 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
149514 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $608.57 BATTERIES
149515 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $2,892.37 LABSUPPUES
149516 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $154.30 TRUCK WASH TICKETS
149517 BIOSOLIOS RECYCLERS OF SO CAL $1.000.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES
149518 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $18,143.47 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-1-2
149519 BRENNER-FIEDLER&ASSOC.,INC. $101.84 GENERATORS
149520 BUSH&ASSOCIATES,INC. $4,652.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.641-94
149521 CCI TECHNOLOGIES $527.00 SPLICE CABLES
149522 C.C.S.C.E. $210.11 PUBLICATION
149523 CEM CORPORATION $7,300.40 LAB SUPPLIES
149524 CHI HILL $10.806.20 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-31
149525 CALFON CONSTRUCTION $306,091.66 CONSTRUCTION 7-22&7-24
149526 CALTROL,INC. $1,231.05 HARDWARE
149527 CALIF ASSOC.OF SAN.AGENCIES $120.00 WORK CONFERENCE REGISTRATION
FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 01/2V96 PAGE2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 01/24/96 POSTING DATE 01124M
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
149528 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $85.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
149529 CALTEX PLASTICS,INC. $1.064.72 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
149530 CAMALI CORP. $3.625.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
149531 CAPITALWESTWARD $223.71 MECHANICAL PARTS
149532 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $17,762.25 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-15-2
149533 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $1,337.14 ENGINEERING SERVICES MO 8-23-95
149534 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $699.18 OFFICE FURNITURE
149535 MICHAEL A CHAMP $6,500.00 OCEAN MONITORING
149536 CHROME CRANKSHAFT,INC. $720.00 PUMP PARTS
149537 CLEMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL $12,572.67 CONSULTANT-LANDFILL PROJECT MO 7-31-95
149538 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $11.191.23 ELECTRIC PARTS
149539 CONSUMER PIPE $1,287.02 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
149540 CONTINENTAL EQUIP B SUPPLY $16.52 TOOLS
149541 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $715.46 ENGINE PARTS
149542 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $346.10 TRUCK PARTS
149643 COVEY LEADERSHIP CENTER $558.00 SUBSCRIPTION
149544 CHARLES P.CROWLEY,CO. $369.24 INSTRUMENT PARTS
149645 CITY OF CYPRESS $25.00 BUDGETCOPY
1495M STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION 5311.50 UNDERGROUND FUEIJOIL STORAGE TAX
149547 SWRCB/AFRS $400.00 WASTE DISCHARGE FEE
149548 DATA SYSTEMS SERVICE $278.58 SOFTWARE
149549 ALBERT W DAVIES INC $474.827.36 CONSTRUCTION 3-36R
149550 DEL MAR ANALYTICAL 52,208.00 LAB SUPPLIES
149551 THE DIAMOND GROUP 54,000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
149552 LABCLEAR $100.52 LAB SUPPLIES
149553 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $392.51 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
149554 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $942.52 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE
149555 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $265.50 PAINT SUPPLIES
149556 EDWARDS DIV.OF GS BLDG SYS. $2,641.50 SERVICE AGREEMENT
149557 LINDA EISMAN $636.66 TRAINING SUPPLIES
149558 EMERGENCY MGMT NETWORK $1,380.00 CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING
149559 ENCHANTER,INC. $2.800.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5-24-95
149560 FLUID TECH.SALES $614.71 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
149561 FST SAND AND GRAVEL,INC. $1,282.26 ROAD BASE MATERIALS
149662 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $16,318.36 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-11-91
149563 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $138.50 AIR FREIGHT
149564 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $416.84 FILTERS
149665 FIRST CHOICE $1,164.32 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT
149566 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $429.60 LAB SUPPLIES
149567 FISONS INSTRUMENTS $2,161.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
149565 FLICKINGERCO $233.99 VALVE
149569 FLOSYSTEMS $10,575.06 PUMP PARTS
149570 FLUID METERING INC $2,051.17 LAB SUPPLIES
149571 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $895.80 PAINT SUPPLIES
149572 GMF SOUND INC $975.62 COMMUNICATIONS SUPPLIES
149573 DST,INC. $1,98TM OFFICE SUPPLIES
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0122196 PAGE 3
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 0124196 POSTING DATE 0124M
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
149574 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $2.994,37 ELECTRIC PARTS
149575 GENERAL PETROLEUM $16,953.22 DIESEL/UNLEADED FUEL
149576 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $6.588.97 TELEPHONE SERVICES
14957 TOM GERUNGER $1,723.44 REIMS.TRAINING B TRAVEL
149578 GOVT CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENT $175.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
149579 GOVERNMENT INSTITUTES INC $1.655.00 PUBLICATIONS
149580 GRASSY S.T.I. $604.50 ENGINE PARTS
149581 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC WHOLESALE $402.43 FIBER OPTIC SUPPLIES
14082 DGA CONSULTANTS 56,933.93 SURVEYING SERVICES MO 8-23-958 MO 64-94
149583 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $958.49 TRUCK PARTS
14VA4 HARBOUR ENGINEERING $15,571.00 MECHANICAL PARTS
149585 HAUTAWAY CONTAINERS $730.00 CONTAINER RENTALS
149586 HAWKINS ASSOCIATES $450.00 LAB EQUIPMENT
149587 HOLMES S NARVER,INC. $9.125.30 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI44&P2-53 MO 3-&95
149588 HOME DEPOT 5132.26 SMALL HARDWARE
149689 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $988.89 PAINT SUPPLIES
149590 IAHS PRESS $65.00 PUBLICATION
149591 1 C M A DISTRIBUTION CTR $232.40 PUBLICATIONS
149592 IPCO SAFETY $3.097.46 SAFETY SUPPLIES
149593 ITT BARTON SALES $960.29 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
149594 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $426.31 BATTERIES
149595 CITY OF IRVINE $29,000.00 ADJUST B REHABILITATE 43 MANHOLES
149596 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $70.44 WATER USE
14097 J2 PRINTING SERVICES $525.62 PRINTING
149598 JAMISON ENGINEERING $25,098.32 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
149599 JAYS CATERING $4T60 DIRECTORS MEETING EXPENSE
149M JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO. $64.80 GAUGE
149601 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $1,166.08 ELECTRIC PARTS
149602 JONES CHEMICALS.INC. $13,916.72 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE MO 4-26-95
149603 JONES INDUSTRIAL HARDWARE CO. $1,091.87 TOOLS
149604 KAL ARCHITECTS $1,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
149505 FRANCES L.KALUZNY $1,680.D0 HUMAN RESOURCES CONSULTANT
149606 KEYE PRODUCTIVITY CENTER $248.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
1496137 KING BEARING,INC. $1,045.96 MACHINE SUPPLIES
149608 KIPLINGER $132.00 PUBLICATION
149509 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $6,538.02 TOOLS
149610 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE OO. $330.79 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICE
149611 LAIDLAW ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES $32,220.24 WASTE DISPOSAL
149612 LAMSON CORPORATION $213.89 COMPUTER PARTS
149613 LAW/CRANDAL,INC. $1,778.76 SOIL TESTING 7-13.94
149614 LEAGUE OF CLAIF.CRIES $165.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION
149615 LEE B RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC. $23,798.69 ENGINEERING SERVICES
149616 SOLD-LYNCH CORP. $493.93 JANITORIAL SERVICES
149517 MPS $59.34 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
149618 MACOMOO $464.10 SERVICE AGREEMENT
149619 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS,INC. S6,1S4.68 MECHANICAL SUPPUES
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 01/22/96 PAGE 4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 0124196 POSTING DATE 01/24/96
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
149620 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $612,150.00 CONSTRUCTION P1-3&2
149621 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $58,703.97 CONSTRUCTION P2.42-2
149622 MARTIN INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE $3,475.20 SECURITY CONSULTING
149623 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $438.88 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
149624 THE MCGRAW-HILL COMPANIES $134.47 PUBLICATION
149625 DONALD F. MCINTYRE $103.91 REIMBURSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE
149626 MEASUREMENT VARIABLES,INC. $1,236.98 FILTER SUPPLIES
149527 MIDWAY MFG.&MACHINING $9.298.68 MECHANICAL REPAIRS
14%28 MILLTRONICS $1,787.53 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
149629 MONITOR LABS $249.98 INSTRUMENT
149630 MUSTANG UNITS CO.,INC. $3,509.00 ENGINE
149631 NASCO $271.33 LAB SUPPLIES
149M NAT WEST MARKETS $1.000.00 COP INTEREST DRAW FEES
149633 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES $875.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES
149634 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $2,215.02 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
149635 NEWARK ELECTRONICS $153.05 INSTRUMENT PARTS
149636 NICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY $20.901.82 LUBRICANTS/DIESEL FUEL
149637 OLSTEN STAFFING SERVICES $2.016.00 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
149638 THE ORANGE COUNTY FORUM $375.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING
149639 ORANGE VALVE B FITTING CO. $1,375.39 F MNGS
149640 OXYGEN SERVICE $1,628.01 SPECIALTY GASES
149641 COUNTY OF ORANGE $2,630.50 PERMITS
149542 PACIFIC PARTS $2,381.62 INSTRUMENT PARTS
149 13 PACIFIC BELL $1,702.86 TELEPHONE SERVICES
149644 PADGETT - THOMPSON $585.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
149645 PAGENET $1,015.90 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
149646 PALLETS B ACCESSORIES CO. $1,531.13 PALLETS
149647 PARKHOUSE TIRE,INC. $1,108.88 TIRES
149648 PARTS UNLIMITED $338.96 TRUCK PARTS
149649 PEGASUS MAIL-C/O DAVID HARRIS $350.00 SOFTWARE
149660 PENN STATE UNIVERSITY $4,790.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
149651 MIKE PETERSON $105.49 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
149652 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $4,551.57 REIMS.PETTY CASH,TRAINING&TRAVEL
149653 POLYMETRICS,INC. $1.262.75 LAB SUPPLIES
149664 POLYPURE,INC. $23,199.40 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-92
149655 POSTAGE BY PHONE $5,000.00 POSTAGE
149656 PUMPING SOLUTIONS INC $813.66 PUMP PARTS
149657 PUT2MEISTER,INC. $92.52 PUMP PARTS
149558 DIMS INC $183.23 REPAIR
149659 QUICKSTART TECHNOLOGIES $3.760.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
149660 R&R INSTRUMENTS $561.59 ELECTRIC PARTS
149661 RAININ INSTRUMENT GO. $902.88 LAB SUPPLIES
149582 THE REGISTER $1,168.80 NOTICES&ADS
149663 REMEDYTEMP $3,190.71 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
149664 RENOLD INC. $85.10 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
149M DON RICHARDSON WATER TRUCK $8,249.50 WATERTANK
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 01/22/96 PAGE 5
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 01/24M POSTING DATE 01/24/96
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
1496M RM MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL $2,378.95 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
149667 RODNEY-HUNT CO $245.40 HEADWORKS REPAIR
149M SKC WEST $1,284.94 SAFETY SUPPLIES
149669 SANTA FE BAG CO. $218.94 FREIGHT
149670 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $78.12 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
149671 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTL $0,715.64 OCEAN MONITORING MO 6-2SAS
149672 R.CRAIG SCOTT&ASSOC. $2,756.87 LEGAL SERVICES-PERSONNEL ISSUES
149673 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $1,482.16 SPECIALTY GASES
149674 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $2,033.60 TOOLS
149675 SHURELUCK SALES $4,215.09 TOOLS/NARDWARE
149676 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $1,588.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS
149677 SMITH-EMERY CO. $516.OD SOIL TESTING M.0.7-13-99
149678 SMITH PIPE&SUPPLY $343.37 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
149679 ROYA SOHAWIKI $754.62 DAMAGE CLAIM SETTLEMENT
149680 SO COASTAIR QUALITY $1,642.48 PERMIT FEES
149681 SOUTHERN CALIF ASSOC OF $75.00 PUBLICATION
149662 SO CALIF EDISON 00 $1.284.86 POWER
149583 SO CALIF EDISON CO $25,896.30 POWER
149664 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $27,157.73 NATURAL GAS
149685 SO.CALIF.WATER CO. $69.03 WATER USE
149686 SPEX CHEMICAL&SAMPLE PREP $314.98 LAB SUPPLIES
149687 SUMMIT STEEL $2,538.17 METAL
149US SUPELCO,INC. $1,320.63 LAB SUPPLIES
149669 SUPER CHEM CORP. $608.86 CHEMICALS
149690 SURVEYORS SERVICE CO $134.79 TOOLS
149691 SYNECTIC MEDICAL,INC. $1,561.00 LAB SUPPLIES
149692 T&C INDUSTRIAL CONTROLS $1,613.00 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
149693 TEKTRONIX,INC. $385.96 INSTRUMENT PARTS
149694 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $369.21 MECHANICAL PARTS
149695 THORPE INSULATION $47.63 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
149595 TONYS LOCK&SAFE SERVICE $80.81 LOCKS&KEYS
149897 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $202.05 TRUCK PARTS
149598 TRUESDAIL LABS $3.540.00 LAB SERVICES
149699 JG TUCKER&SON,INC. $15.111.20 INSTRUMENT PARTS
149700 VWR SCIENTIFIC $3.281.08 LAB SUPPLIES
149701 VALIN CORPORATION $498.46 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
149702 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $1,392,410 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
149703 VERTEX TECHNOLOGIES,INC. $5.192.66 FIBEROPTICS
149704 WARREN GORHAM&LAMONT INC $349.21 PUBLICATION&SUBSCRIPTION
149705 WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION $1A55.96 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT COURSES
149706 WAXIE $1.955.02 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
149707 WAYNE ELECTRIC $283.83 TRUCK PARTS
149708 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $23,679.12 CAUSTIC SODA MO 8-23-95
149709 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $367.28 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
149710 ROURKE,WOODRUFF&SPRADLIN $78.983.59 LEGAL SERVICES MO 7-2"5
149711 XEROX CORP. $16,404.62 COPIER LEASES
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 0122M PAGES
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 0124/96 POSTING DATE 0124/98
WARRANTNO. VENDOR
149712 JOHNSON YOKOGAWA CORP. $714.63 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 12/27/95 $2,387.767.17
SUMMARY AMOUNT
#1 CONSTR FUND $92.60
02 OPER FUND $14.36
02 CAP FAC FUND $1,028.74
#2 CONSTR FUND $262.51
#3 OPER FUND $25,344.19
#3 CAP FAC FUND $474,827.36
#3 CONSTR FUND $283.71
#5 OPER FUND $392.27
#5 CONSTR FUND $84.80
#6 CONSTR FUND $89.20
#7 OPER FUND 575.42
#7 CAP FAC FUND 312,016.06
#7 CONSTR FUND 98.11
011 OPER FUND 8,740.18
011 CAP FAC FUND 1,637.14
#11 CONSTR FUND 85.71
#13 CONSTR FUND $3.40
014 OPER FUND $30.85
914 CAP FAC FUND $714.00
914 CONSTR FUND $19.96
#3&11 OPER FUND $875.00
#5&S OPER FUND $34.04
#58S CAP FAC FUND $644.00
46&7 OPER FUND $213.30
#7&14 OPER FUND $15.98
JT OPER FUND $330,891.89
CORF $716,314.33
SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $3,511.49
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $506,946.67
$2.387,767.17
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 01/30/96 PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 01/30/96 POSTING DATE O1I30/96
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
149714 ACWA $300.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING
149715 CALIF.DEBT ADVISORY $100.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING
149716 JAYS CATERING $1,684A9 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE
149717 R.CRAIG SCOTT B ASSOC. $8.682.81 LEGAL SERVICES-PERSONNEL ISSUES
$10,667.50
SUMMARY AMOUNT
JT OPER FUND $1,984.69
CORF $100.00
SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $8,582.81
$10,667.50
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE OVD6195 PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 02107M POSTING DATE 02107M
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
149731 AT&T- UNIPLANSERVICE $2,494.65 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
149732 AT&T-MEGACOM SERVICE $1,40C38 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
149733 AT&T $56.53 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
149734 AT&T-CELLULAR CR&R $8.65 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
149735 A-Z LOGIC SYSTEMS $192.62 LABSUPPLIES
149736 RP ADAMS COMPANY $1,750.43 MECHANICAL PARTS
149737 AIR LIQUIDE AMERICA CORP. $1,947.32 SPECIALTY GASSES
14973E AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $18,565.43 O&M AGREEMENT OKY GEN.SYST.M.O.B.9.89
149739 AIRBORNE EXPRESS $347.57 AIR FREIGHT
149740 AMERIDATA $1,128.61 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
149741 AMERICAN AIRLINES $824.35 TRAVEL SERVICES
149742 AMOCO ENERGY TRADING $61,394.58 NATURAL GAS MO 6.28-95
149743 ANIXTER-DISTRIBUTION $3.670.09 COMPUTER SUPPLIES
149744 APLUS SYSTEMS $2,332.22 NOTICES&ADS
149746 APPLE ONE $2,208.80 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
149746 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $124.63 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
149747 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT $1,346.82 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
149748 ATKINIJONES COMPUTER SERVICE $642.60 SERVICE AGREEMENT
149749 AUTODESKINC. $5,096.52 SOFTWARE
149750 B.M.I. $325.00 ELECTRIC PARTS
149751 E S BABCOCK&SONS INC $898.50 LAB ANALYSIS
149752 BANANA BLUEPRINT $22,449.24 PRINTING M.O.11-07-94
149753 BANK OF AMERICA $220.64 BANKING CHARGES
149754 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $984.95 BATTERIES
149755 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $1,204.72 LAB SUPPLIES
149756 BERENDSEN FLUID POWER $112.27 VALVE
149757 BLANCHARD TRAINING&DEV $1,083.30 TRAINING PUBLICATIONS
149758 TOM BLANDA $136.79 TRAINING EXPENSE REIMS
. 149759 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $2.842.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-18
149760 BRENNER-FIEDLER&ASSOC.,INC. $5,597.67 GENERATORS
149761 BROOKS INSTRUMENT DIV. $341.25 INSTRUMENT
149762 BUDGET JANITORIAL $3,330.00 JANITORIAL SERVICES MO 1-12-94
149763 BNI BOOKS $89.92 BOOKS
149764 CCI TECHNOLOGIES $420.00 SPLICE CABLES
149765 CEPA $899.50 LAB ANALYIS
149766 CH2M HILL $164,542.45 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-31
149767 CS COMPANY $5,762.96 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
149768 CALFON CONSTRUCTION $97,833.03 CONSTRUCTION 7-22&7-24
149769 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH INC. $969.75 LAB SUPPLIES
149770 CALTROL,INC. $6,303.69 HARDWARE
149T71 CAMAU CORP. $1,124.88 SERVICE AGREEMENT
149772 CANUS CORPORATION $8,286.52 FIBER OPTIC CABLE
149773 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $32,317.74 ENGINEERING SERVICES MO 5-24-95
149774 RICHARD CASTILLON $135.96 TRAINING EXPENSE REIMB
149775 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $1,758.15 OFFICE FURNITURE
149776 CHEMWEST INC $1,335.02 PUMP PARTS
FUND NO 9199 - R DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0V06IN PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 02/07/96 POSTING DATE 02107M
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
149777 CHROME CRANKSHAFT,INC. S2AOA0 PUMP PARTS
140778 CLEMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL $20,086.10 CONSULTANT-LANDFILL PROJECT MO 7-31.95
149779 COASTAL VIDEO COMMUNICATION $13,501.43 TRAINING VIDEOS
149780 COUCH&SONS $30,643.20 CONSTRUCTION M-044
149781 COUCH 8 SONS $190,334.00 CONSTRUCTION 11-17.1
W82 COMMUNICATIONS PERFORMANCE GROUP $17,850.0D PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
149783 COMPUSA,INC. $64.97 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
149784 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $7.659.20 ELECTRIC PARTS
149785 CONSUMER PIPE $2,071.20 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
149786 CONTINENTAL EQUIPMENT 8 SUPPLY $2,213.04 TOOLS
149787 CONTINENTAL LAB PRODUCTS,INC. $60.54 LAB SUPPLIES
149788 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $17,897.03 ENGINE PARTS
149789 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $2,464.74 ELECTRIC PARTS
149790 CHARLES P.CROV A",CO. $648.26 INSTRUMENT PARTS
149791 ALBERT W.DAVIES,INC. $320,454.55 CONSTRUCTION 3-36R
149792 DOUGLAS J DAVIS&ASSOC.,INC. $3.949.90 INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE SERVICES
149793 DELL COMPUTER CORP. $752.10 COMPUTER PARTS
149794 DELMAR ANALYTICAL $190.00 BIOSOUDS ANALYSIS
149795 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIF. $60,889.11 DENTAL INSURANCE PLAN M.O.1.12.94
149796 DELTA FOAM PRODUCTS $145.00 LAB SUPPLIES
149797 THE DIAMOND GROUP $4.000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
149798 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $31,912.81 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
149799 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $90.51 PAINT SUPPLIES
149M OVALS SALES $576.19 FRTINGS
149801 DYCORP $241.79 TRUCK PARTS
149502 ESP NORTH $685.46 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
149803 EDWARDS HIGH VACUUM INTER. $290.57 LAB SUPPLIES
149504 FMC CORPORATION $75,299.11 HYDROGEN PEROXIDE MO 9.14-94
149B05 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $111.65 AIR FREIGHT
149M FILTERLINE CORP. $37.00 FILTERS
149807 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $4.839.53 FILTERS
149M FIRST CHOICE $391.64 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT
149809 FISCHER B PORTER CO. $2,774.75 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES
149810 FISHER ROSEMOUNT $1,736.98 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
149811 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $13,591.44 WATER USE
149812 FRY'S ELECTRONICS $723.39 ELECTRONIC&COMPUTER SUPPLIES
149813 EST,INC. $11,443.85 COMPUTER SUPPLIES
149814 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $2,643.98 CHEMICALS
149815 GATES FIBERGLASS INSTALLERS $3,204.62 FIBERGLASS WHEEL
149816 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. 54,056.49 ELECTRIC PARTS
149817 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1,078.10 TELEPHONE SERVICES
149818 GERHARDTS,INC. $4,200.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
149819 GIERUCH-MITCHELL,INC. $25,486.56 PUMP PARTS
149820 4WV GRAINGER.INC. $122.64 COMPRESSOR PARTS
149521 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $2,095.90 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
14982.2 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC WHOLESALE $3,238.29 FIBER OPTIC SUPPLIES
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGOATE 02106W PAGES
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 02/07/96 POSTING DATE 02/07/9B
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
149823 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $600.52 PRINTING
149824 DGA CONSULTANTS $3,020.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.641-94
149825 HR DIRECT $13.99 OFFICE SUPPLIES
1498M HB TYPE&GRAPHICS $346.96 PRINTING
149827 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $3.199.88 TRUCK PARTS
149828 HACH COMPANY $3,810.36 LAB SUPPLIES
149829 GEORGE T.HALL CO. $456.18 ELECTRIC PARTS
149830 HATCH&KIRK,INC. $3,024.91 TRUCK PARTS
149831 PL HAWN CO,INC. $321.23 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
149832 HELLO DIRECT $198.76 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
149833 HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT $2,083.33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN.
149834 HERTZ EQUIPMENT RENTAL $602.95 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
149835 HOERBIGER CVS CALIF.,INC. $2,972.57 COMPRESSOR PARTS
14%36 HOME DEPOT $756.92 SMALL HARDWARE
149837 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $653.38 PAINT SUPPLIES
149838 I CM A DISTRIBUTION CENTER $141.85 PUBLICATION
149839 IPCO SAFETY $4,121.94 SAFETY SUPPLIES
149840 ISI INFORTEXT $3.692.75 SOFTWARE
149841 ITT BARTON SALES $192.12 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
149842 IMAGING PLUS $523,81 OFFICE SUPPLIES
149843 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS- $35.56 CONNECTORS
149W INORGANIC VENTURES $22Z72 LAB SUPPLIES
149US INSIDE EPA $1,335.00 SUBSCRIPTIONS
14SUS INSTRUMENT LABORATORY $373.59 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
149547 IRVINE PHOTO GRAPHICS $21.29 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
149848 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $5.54 WATER USE
149849 IRVINE SCI-TECH BOOKS $43000 PUBLICATIONS
149850 J2 PRINTING SERVICES $2,533.79 PRINTING
14%51 JAMISON ENGINEERING $12,010.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
149852 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $1.711.37 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
149853 DEE JASPAR 8 ASSOC. $5.086.32 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
149854 JAYS CATERING $1,418.39 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE
149855 JOHNSON CONTROLS,INC. $203.60 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
149856 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $149.20 ELECTRIC PARTS
149857 JOHNSTON PUMP CO $2.183.02 ELECTRIC PARTS
149858 JONES CHEMICALS, INC. $7,457.31 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE MO 420.95
149859 FRANCES L KALUZNY $1.280.00 HUMAN RESOURCES CONSULTANT
149860 KELLY PAPER $937.40 PRINTING
149861 KEMIRON PACIFIC,INC. $149.592.10 FERRIC CHLORIDE MO9-27-95
149862 KERRY CONSULTING GROUP $3,906.18 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MO I1-15-95
149863 KEYE PRODUCTIVITY CENTER $139.00 REGISTRATION
149864 KING BEARING,INC. $1,408.90 MACHINE SUPPLIES
149W5 KLEINFELDER $432.00 GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTING SERVICES
149M KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $5,59B.92 TOOLS
149867 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $613.57 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICE
145869 LAIDLAW ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES $5.444.04 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DISPOSAL
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 02/06/96 PAGE 4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 02/07/96 POSTING DATE 02M7/96
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
149869 LAN-AIR SUPPLY CO.,INC. $114.53 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
149870 LASERALL CORP. $582.00 PRINTER REPAIR
149871 LAW/CRANDAL,INC. $660.00 SOIL TESTING 7.13-94
149872 LEE B RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC. $9,9D6.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES
149873 LIEBERT CORPORATION $2,291.38 ELECTRIC PARTS
149874 KP.LINDSTROM,INC. $3,481.14 ENVIR.CONSULTING SERVICES MO 12-9-90
149875 LUSTRE-CAL $545.96 SAFETY
149876 MDT BIOLOGIC COMPANY $936.00 LAB SUPPLIES
149877 MPS $414.84 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
149878 MACOMOO $696.75 SERVICE AGREEMENT
149879 MAGNETEK $38.213.59 GENERATOR MAINTENANCE
149880 MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY CORP. $1,652.48 TOOLS
149881 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $22.20 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
149082 MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. $551.63 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
149883 MIDWAY MFG.B MACHINING $3,029.56 MECHANICAL REPAIRS
149884 MISSION INDUSTRIES $6,704.89 UNIFORM RENTALS
149885 MONITOR LABS $874.44 INSTRUMENT
149886 MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE $5,D00.00 RATING SERVICE MAINTENANCE FEES
149887 MOORE PRODUCTS DO $179.39 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
149888 MORTON SALT $673.70 SALT
149889 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES $5,387.50 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES
149890 G ROBERT NEASE PHOTOGRAPHY $1,677.67 PROFESSIONAL PHOTOGRAPHER
149691 NEW HORIZONS COMPUTER CENTERS,INC. $780.00 SOFTWARE TRAINING CLASSES
149892 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $6.00 WATER USE
149893 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $6,929.94 OFFICE SUPPLIES
149894 OLSTEN STAFFING SERVICES $1,708.00 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
149895 ORANGE COURIER $138.65 COURIER SERVICES
149696 ORANGE VALVE 8 FITTING CO. $107.91 FITTINGS
149897 OXYGEN SERVICE $3.488.73 SPECIALTY GASES
149898 ORANGE CO EMPLOYEES $4.799.25 EARLY RETIREMENT PROGRAM REIMB
149899 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT $27,750.20 GAP WATER USE M.0.6-9-93
149900 PACIFIC CLIPPIINGS $188.80 CONTRACT SERVICE
149901 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $1,116.06 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
149902 PACIFIC PARTS $9.238.84 INSTRUMENT PARTS
149903 PACIFIC BELL $16.90 TELEPHONE SERVICES
149904 PARAGON CABLE $41.28 CABLE SERVICES
149905 PARKHOUSE TIRE,INC. $555.99 TIRES
149906 PEDERSEN COMMUNICATIONS $4.348.00 INSTALLATION OF CABLES
149907 PERSONAL STRENGHTS PUBLICATION $394.01 PUBLICATION
149908 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $620.07 REIMB.PETTY CASH,TRAINING 8 TRAVEL
149909 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $193,093.20 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3.2M!i
149910 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS $5.914.44 CONSULTING SERVICE
149911 POLYPURE,INC. $24,135.22 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92
149912 POWER PROTECTION $432.48 MISC.HARDWARE
149913 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $112.00 ICE FOR SAMPLES
149914 PROMINENT FLUID CONTROL,INC. $799.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE O2/05196 PAGE 5
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 02/07/96 POSTING DATE 02/07/96
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
149915 PRYOR REPORT $532.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
149916 PUBLIC SECTOR EXCELLENCE $7,200.00 TRAINING CONSULTANT-RISK MGMT
149917 PUMPING SOLUTIONS,INC. $298.33 PUMP PARTS
149918 PYRAMID FENCE COMPANY $2.275.00 FENCING INSTALLATION
149919 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $690.59 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS
149920 R&RINSTRUMENTS $1,537.7D ELECTRIC PARTS
149921 REMEDYTEMP $2.245.53 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
149922 DON RICHARDSON WATER TRUCK $8,218.50 WATERTANK
149923 RM MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL AND/OR RITTAL $2,126.67 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
149924 LAWRENCE ROOD $186.85 EXPENSE REPORT
149925 BANDON ENGINEERING,INC. $750.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES
149926 SANTA FIE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $154.83 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
149927 BASCO ELECTRIC $2.220.00 CONTRACT SERVICES
149928 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTL $38.887.70 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.63-94
149929 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $3.678.03 SPECIALTY GASES
149930 SENTIENT SYSTEMS,INC. $19,619.87 FACILITATOR SERVICES
14MI SHURELUCK SALES $3,810.75 TOOLS/HARDWARE
149932 THE SMITH GROUP $3.487.10 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
149933 SOLAR TURBINES INCORPORATED $304.98 MECHANICAL PARTS
149934 SO COAST AIR QUALITY $2,59,119 PERMIT FEES
149935 SO CALIF EDISON CO $59,477.32 POWER
149935 $0 CALIF EDISON CO $16,241.93 POWER
149937 SO.CALIFORNIA MARINE INST. $800.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
149938 STAMEN Z.SPASSOFF P.E. $4,000.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19-2
149939 SUMMIT STEEL $602.02 METAL
149940 SUPERB ONE-HOUR PHOTO $36.26 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
149941 SYMCAS $5.657.92 SOFTWARE LICENSE
149042 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $2,728.03 MECHANICAL PARTS
149943 TIRE WAREHOUSE $1.113.62 TIRES
149944 TONER SYSTEM INTERNATIONAL $1,412.18 PRINTER SUPPLIES
149945 TRANE $352.41 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
149946 TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY,INC. $17,503.84 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.O.5-11-94
149947 TRUCK B AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $535.71 TRUCK PARTS
149948 TRUESDAIL LABS $1,128.10 LAB SERVICES
149949 JG TUCKER&SON,INC. $2,326.54 INSTRUMENT PARTS
149950 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $403.00 LAB SUPPLIES
149951 UNISOURCEWOR BUTLER PAPER $837.49 OFFICE SUPPLIES
149952 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $606.70 PARCEL SERVICES
149953 VWR SCIENTIFIC $145.42 LAB SUPPLIES
149954 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $2,089.95 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
149955 VANIER BUSINESS FORMS $975.95 OFFICE SUPPLIES
149956 VARIAN ASSOCIATES,INC. $1,298.61 LAB SUPPLIES
149957 VERTEX SYSTEMS $3,570.26 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT
149958 VILLAGE NURSERIES $326.26 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES
149959 WACKENHUT CORP. $27,296.79 CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS
149M WALCON CONSTRUCTION CO. $170,041.19 CONSTRUCTION 537-3
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 02MISM PAGE 6
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 02007/96 POSTING DATE 02007/96
WARRANT NO. VENDOR
149961 WALGON CONSTRUCTION CO. $8,400.89 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
149962 CARL WARREN B CO. $300.00 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR
149963 WAXIE 54,792.61 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
149964 WESTERN CITY MAGAZINE $63.00 SUBSCRIPTION
149965 WESTERN COMPONENT SALES NORTH $417.32 LAB SUPPLIES
149966 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $35,993.49 CAUSTIC SODA MO 8-23-95
149967 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $1,015.13 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
149968 WESCO $290.89 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
149969 WOLFE AND ASSOCIATESJNC. $1,688.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
149970 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. 1291.57 LAB SUPPLIES
149971 YELLOW SPRINGS INSTRUMENT CO. $37.14 LAB SUPPLIES
149972 AG TECH COMPANY $58,580.03 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O./0-9-91
149973 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. $60.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL
140974 AWARDS B TROPHIES $147.58 PLAQUES
149975 BANANA BLUEPRINT $227.10 PRINTING M.O.11-07-94
149976 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $4,340.62 LAB SUPPLIES
149977 BIOGRO DIVISION $54,345.91 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 4-26-95
149978 COMPUSERVE $126.02 COMPUTER SERVICES
149979 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $1,463.86 ELECTRIC PARTS
149980 ENCHANTER,INC. $3,500.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5-24-95
149981 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $867.70 LAB SERVICES
149982 FST SAND AND GRAVEL,INC. $769.35 ROAD BASE MATERIALS
149963 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $7.568.75 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91
140M FILTER SUPPLY CO. $33.97 FILTERS
149985 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $889.16 LAB SUPPLIES
149986 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $360.68 PHOTO SUPPLIES
149987 NEW HORIZONS COMPUTER CENTERS,INC. $5,340.00 SOFTWARE TRAINING CLASSES
149988 BOLT DELIVERY $99.30 FREIGHT
$2.602,740.34
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE OV06196 PAGE 7
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 02/07186 POSTING DATE 02I07196
SUMMARY AMOUNT
#1 CONSTR FUND $443.50
02 OPER FUND $3,135.08
02 CAP FAC FUND $11.91
#2 CONSTR FUND $106.50
#3 OPER FUND $42.711.83
#3 CAP FAC FUND $380,028.95
#3 CONSTR FUND $1,074.50
#5 OPER FUND $12,132.11
#5 CONSTR FUND $570.50
#6 CAP FAC FUND W9.84
#6 CONSTR FUND $183.00
#7 OPER FUND $15,594.71
#7 CAP FAC FUND $46.079.18
#7 CONSTR FUND $515.00
#11 OPER FUND $4.148.29
#11 CAP FAC FUND $190,778.76
#11 CONSTR FUND $227.00
#14 CAP FAG FUND $17.05
#5&6 OPER FUND $2,454.64
#566 CAP FAC FUND 170,082.66
#687 OPER FUND 2.258.68
#7814 OPER FUND 6,341.96
JT OPER FUND $1,097,537.60
CORP $377.866.63
SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $63,272.44
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $183.218.02
$2.602,740.34
JOINT CHAIRMAN'S REPORT
JOINT BOARD MEETING OF
FEBRUARY 28, 1996
1 . I'M SURE YOU HAVE READ THE ARTICLES IN THE
NEWSPAPER ON THE SPILL IN NEWPORT BEACH. DON
MC INTYRE WILL BE DISCUSSING IT IN MORE DETAIL
DURING HIS REPORT.
2. THE NEXT DIRECTORS' WORKSHOP ON STRATEGIC
PLANNING HAS BEEN SCHEDULED FOR SATURDAY,
MAY 4, 1996 BETWEEN 9 AND NOON HERE IN THE
BOARD ROOM. THE ELEMENTS THAT WILL BE
ADDRESSED ARE WATER CONSERVATION AND
RECLAMATION, THE STAFF WANTS TO MAKE THIS
SESSION MORE "GIVE-AND-TAKE" AND LESS OF A
LECTURE, AND TO THAT END IS CONSIDERING HIRING
A FACILITATOR TO HELP GENERATE MORE AUDIENCE
PARTICIPATION.
i
3. UPCOMING MEETINGS:
A. THE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL
SERVICES COMMITTEE WILL MEET ON
WEDNESDAY, MARCH 6TH AT 5:30 P.M.
B. THE PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION
COMMITTEE WILL MEET ON THURSDAY, MARCH
7TH AT 5:30 P.M.
C. THE FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN
RESOURCES COMMITTEE WILL MEET ON
WEDNESDAY, MARCH 13TH AT 5:30 P.M.
D. THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE WILL MEET ON
WEDNESDAY, MARCH 2OTH AT 5:30 P.M. TO
CONSIDER THE PORTER PLATING APPEAL.
E. THE NEXT BOARD MEETING IS SCHEDULED FOR
MARCH 27TH.
2
• MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 28. 1996 TIME:7.30 P.M. DISTRICTS: 1.2.3.5.6.7,11.13 AND 14
DISTRICT 1 JOINT BOARDS
IMORENOI .... ... . . . . MC GUIGAN . . .. .. . . ✓ IKERRYI ............. BOWMAN ......... ✓
IPERRYISCHAFERN .. . . . FERRYMAN . .... . .. IHASTMGSI........... BROWN ........... �/
ICOONTZI . .. . . . .. . . . MURMY .. . . ..... . T ISCOTR . ............ COLLINS .......... _le
(POTTSI ........ . . . . SALTARELLI . . .... .. . (DEBAYN .. ........... ............ —
(STEINER) ........ . . . STANTON . . ....... W ICO%1 ... . ........... DEBAY ........... / —
(ULU ....... ........ DENES ........... f —
IBAUEA) .. . . .. ....... DUNLAP F .......::DISTRI —
(SCOTTCT 2 (PARKER( . . ... ....... ECKMR G .....
(SCOTR ............ COLLINS .......... IDOWNEYI RRY/SC. .. ... . ..... ECKENPODE ....(GUILLDU . _
JULU .SONS........... WELCH (ANDERSOM ... ...... FLORA .. ......
IPARK .............. DENES ............ (MARS ALL) ....... ... FLORA ........... ✓
(DOWNS ......... DUNIAP........... (WELCH) .. .......... GRINTIQULUN .......... _
(ANDERO .......... ECKENPOOE ........ (WELCH) ........... .. HAMM SON ........
(MOUN ) . ......... FLOM ............ Imu ............. HAMMONO ........ y
(MORENOI ........... MCOUIOAN ........ IBAUEN ............. LEIPZIO ...........
(COONTZI ........... MUPPHV .......... OWNER) ............. UNN .... ......... —
IBANKHEADI ......... NOflBY............ IMORENOI ........... . MC OUIOAN........ —
R KETI............ SINGER ......... (COONTZI ........... . MURFHY . . ........
ISTEINEN ........... STANTON ......... IBANKNEADI ........ .. NORBY ........... —
IDALYI ............. ZEMEL ............ (EVANSI ........... RICE .... .........
(POTTS) . ........... . SALTARELLI........
DISTRICTS IDOTSON) ............ SAM .. ......... _
IDOTSONI ........... SAPIEN .. a RLAKER............. SINGER .. .........
IPARKERI ........... DUNLAP........... STEMERI........... .. STANTON . ........
IKERFM ........... . BOWMAN ........ ISTANTONI ........... STEINEA .. ........
(HASTMGS)......... . BROWN . (MILLER) .. SWAN.. . .........
(SCOTT) ............ COLLMS ........: IWAHLSTROM ........ SYLVIA
IANDERSON] ....... .. FRORM (GUL ONI .......... WELCN . . .......
( ......... GROVIN .... IDALYI . ............. .
=
ZEMEL .......... _
(MUM ............ IEIFZPS .........
(MINER) ............ LMN ...........
IMORENOI ........... MCOUIOAN ........ STAFF OTHERS
(BANKHEAD) ......... NOR BY.... ........ ANDERSON . Jt� WOODRUFF .. �
(EVANS I............ RILE ........... GRAY ..... JL ANDRUS ....�
RLAKER............ SINGER ....... HASENSTAB WO DEMIR .....
ISTEINENI STANTON ......... HODGES ... JL NEE .. .. ....
(WAHLSTROM) ...... BYLVM .........:. HOVEY .... JL LMDSTROM
(DALY) ............. gMIL .......... JONK .... NIXON. .....
KYLE ..... SHAW . . . ... �
DISTRICTS LINDEN ....
(LOAN .............. CFBAY............ LUDWINMCWTY ... .
ISTANFO. .......... 111 IN ............ MMEMY .. ........
IDEBAYI ............FBBN�............. ► MdELLY .. ..........
OOTEN .... ..........�
DISTRICTS STPEED ... ..........
(PERRY/SCHAFFN ..... 16WVMAN......... TUCKMAIN . . .. .... _
NCO%I . ............. DRAY........... WHEATLEY . . . ..
ISTANTONI .......... BIEY61........... WILSON .. . . . . . . ....
WINSOR . . . .. . . .. ..
DISTRICT 7 /•/ /'Y/'P`�-V�'� � ,
MARDI . ... ... .... . HAMMOND......... � 'a
IPOTTSI . .. . ... ..... SALTARELLI ........
.............. : ao
f�CO%1 . . . .......... DE ....NR FERN . .... FERRYMAN.... . 4-� � ,
IMORENOP ........... MMRIIAN
MURICOONTZN ........... RHV
ISTANTONI .......... STERNER.........:
"'t" ^ '
DISTRICT.. IE
IBAUERI .... ........ FZIQ ✓ — �.,/�L� /^'i"'v -�
(MUM) . ......... ....... TTT (.w•^'
ISTEM "ANION
IAI ........... BTANTON .........
DISTRICT 13
(WELCH( ............ GULLMSDN ......
IDALYN .. .......... ZEMEI .... ........
MARKER) ........... OUNLAP.... .......
(COONTZI ........... MURPHY .. ........
ISTANTONI STEINER..... ...... —
DISTRICT 14
IPOTTSI .......... SALTAREI ........ .V _
ICCONTZI ............ MURPRY . .......
(WARD) ......... HAMMOND......... _
(STANTON) .......... STEINER.. ......... _ J:IWPOOMBSIDIHECTOFID1.IO2.
(MILLER) ............ SWAN ... ..... .... J;op� 02128/96
PUBLIC SIGN-IN SHEET
oo
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
February 28, 1996 BOARD MEETING
NAME R ANIZATI N FIRM
Please Print Please Print
a
v4p,gv bizwSSL SV0 2D P
/LA / vN TQT6 Sk7n [ tiA/[6RCL27 P/C iNaL�r
REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS
OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM
TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING.
AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE
SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION AND REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO
FIVE MINUTES.
DATE: a - a8 -y' �, AGENDA ITEM NO.
NAME: (PLEASE PRINT) Mar-L Aslu �a5 ff
HOME ADDRESS: 3 c9a Z AfA e i Q ST,
NUMBER STREET
� c-�/ iAe CA- '? a7i -(
i ITY ZIP CODE
TELEPHONE: 77/ ( -S(d1I3
REPRESENTING: C, h
SELF UR NAME OF R ANIZATIO
F28A
REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS
OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM
TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BB ARD�r-
DETERMINED BY THE HAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE
SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION AND REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO
FIVE MINUTES. I1
DATE: �2 4f � AGENDA ITEM NO. -�4 kL /
NAME: (PLEASE PRINT) p'lQ4 I'IcQT��-
HOME ADDRESS: U 14
NUMBT
( + t5'7ebA- 4 0 OD-6V
LrFL;UU
TELEPHONE:
REPRESENTING:
(SELF OR MARE F ORGANIZATION
F28A
02/28/96 -JOINT BOARD MINUTES
#4 - Receive and File Minute Excerpts
VJC: Moving on to item#4 the Supplemental Agenda Item. We have a number of items
on there.
VJC: Appointment of the Supervisors to the various Districts and we have a District No.
2 appointment from Villa Park and receipt of the excerpts. Any opposition? They're
approved.
#5 - Public Comments
VJC: We have two items tonight for public comment
DFM: It might be more appropriate if those came up at the time we talk about the
excess capacity charge.
VJC: Any objection from the public? Any other public comment at this time? Okay,
we'll move into the comments from the Chairman.
#Ja) - Report of Acting Joint Chair/Vice Joint Chair(Joint Chair Cox absent)
VJC: I have a number of items here tonight. The first item I want to talk about is I think
you've all seen in the newspaper reports about an unfortunate spill into Newport Beach.
Don McIntyre will discuss this in more detail during his report. This is not from IRWD by
the way.
The second thing on a more serious note, the next Strategic Planning Meeting is
scheduled for Saturday, May 4 between 9:00 am and noon. The first meeting was very
successful. We have a very good turnout in the members of the Board and the public.
In this upcoming meeting the staff is going to be talking about water conservation and
reclamation. It is set up to be more of a give and take organization and this
consideration of hiring a facilitator to help the meeting. Reclamation is a very large
budget item and activity that this District has in cooperation with the Orange County
Water District.
The third item that I have here today deals with the Orange County Engineering Society
Council, which is a non-profit organization of professional engineering society chapters.
The purpose of the council is to recognize accomplishments of individuals, projects and
companies and to enhance the image of engineering and the engineering profession. It
encourages the participation in public affairs and it is set up to encourage young people
to enter the profession. Each year the council holds an awards banquet in conjunction
with the engineering week to recognize engineering achievements both by individuals
and organizations and for projects. This past Saturday, our Director of Engineering,
David Ludwin, attended the awards banquet to accept an engineering project
achievement award for the secondary treatment expansion at Plant No. 2. The project
was in recognition of the innovative engineering approach that provided a cost effective
design requiring close coordination with Operations because we were continuing to
operate the plant and it was designed and constructed to be environmental sensitive to
the adjacent wetlands.
Award presentation by VJC and comments by David Ludwin could not be heard.
JAWPDOMEISWIN96WOTES.02 Page 1
#6 (a) - Report of Actina Joint ChairNice Joint Chair(continued)
VJC: Upcoming meetings -the OMITS Committee will meet on Wednesday, March 6 at
5:30 pm; the PDC Committee will meet on Thursday, March 7 at 5:30 pm; the FAHR will
meet on Wednesday, March 13 at 5:30 pm; the Executive Committee will meet on
Wednesday, March 20 at 5:30 pm and that will be for consideration of an appeal; and
the next Board Meeting is scheduled for March 27th. That concludes the report by
Acting Joint Chair.
#6(b) - Report of General Manager
DFM: Mr. Chairman, just 3 quick items. First of all, we want to pull Item No. 9a from
the Agenda. Secondly, now is the time that I'd like, with your permission Mr. Chairman,
to have a discussion of the Bay Bridge Spill Report. In the form of an update, I'm going
to call on Nancy Wheatley to lead that off. It's obviously, bad news, but we want you tD
fully understand what happened and why it happened and what we're going to be doing
about it. Finally, as John Cox told you last month, Mahin Talebi gave a presentation at
CASA on how to be business friendly and we thought it would be of interest to all of you
to have her make that presentation. So if time doesn't run too late with the discussion
of the spill, we'll ask her to do that.
Nancy Wheatley: Thank you. I'm going to MC the presentation. Bob Dolan, Director of
Operations and Ed Hodges, Director of Maintenance and myself, Director of Technical
Services are on this side of the room, I think our colleagues wanted us over here so that
they would be protected from anything that might happen. Our departments had
principle responsibilities for managing the events that occurred. The spill did begin at
about 10:00 pm on Wednesday, February 21 st. Ed is going to discuss the chronology
of the event as they unfolded overnight. I am going to discuss the response during the
morning on the site which I was responsible for, Bob is going to review the operations
issues raised by the events. Ed is then going to get up and comment further on some
collection systems issues and I will finish with a discussion of the regulatory
requirements which are reasonably serious and we'll talk more about that.
For your information, in your folders this evening, there was a copy of the letter which
we sent to the Regional Water Quality Control Board on Monday as a 5-day follow-up to
the events and I'll be talking more about the regulatory requirements later on. With that,
I'm going to turn it over to Ed.
TLW: To the members of the Board, we are going to receive this presentation from the
staff on all the facts because the staff wants to make it as public put forth as possible.
We are also going to ask you to review a few portions of this issue in Closed Session on
the basis of potential claims. I just want to be able to take you through it starting from
the premise that just because there's a spill, doesn't automatically mean we are at fault
and that we are liable and there are several issues that have been uncovered in the last
couple of days. I do want to review those with you. Right now your managements
objective is, make sure to get it cleared up, cleaned up and back to a normal status and
a normal life as quickly as possible. But we are going to have some ongoing issues that
we'll be addressing during Closed Session. I therefore, suggest and recommend that if
J:%WPD00\BS\MIN96W0TES.02 Page 2
you have questions concerning what appears to be a liability or whatever related to it,
that we hold those off until the Closed Session.
Ed Hodges: Does the Directors know that the Districts operate 22 outlying pumping
stations that pump wastewater to us for treatment. At approximately, 10:15 pm on
Wednesday, February 21, the Control Center received an alarm that the Bay Bridge
Pump Station, which is located on PCH,just west of Bayside Drive, had a low wetwell
level. This signal caused the pumps to shut down. Shortly thereafter, the alarm was
acknowledged by our Control Center clerk. At approximately 3:00 am on Thursday
morning a resident in the area noticed that sewage was backing up in their home. They
called 911 and no one responded. At about 4:28 am the City of Newport Beach Fire
Department arrived. They called the City of Newport Beach Utilities Department. City
crews arrived shortly thereafter and began interviews with the effected residents.
Approximately 6:00 am on Thursday morning the city crews had identified the problem
to be the Sanitation Districts. They then go to the Bay Bridge Pump Station and notify
our Control Center that they are going to break into our Pump Station. At 6:00 am the
City's Utility staff cut the padlocks and enter the station. They notice that the pumps
were off. They immediately recognize how to start the equipment. They turn the pumps
on and within a few minutes the spill was relieved. At about 6:38 am the Districts
Maintenance crews arrived at the Pump Station and began to troubleshoot the problem.
It's during this time that the Pump Station is run on a manual mode. We also arrived on
the scene to help with the spill assessment and assist with the clean up. We noticed
that fortunately the debris was very minimal. What I'd like to do is briefly go through
some slides.
SLIDE PRESENTATION (narration by Ed Hodges could not be heard)
Nancy Wheatley: I want to talk about what happened at the scene on Thursday
morning. I arrived at the office about 7:00 am on Thursday morning and James Cowan,
who is with the Environmental Management Division and is responsible for our
compliance activities for our NPDS permit came in about 7:15 am and reported to me
that there was a spill on-going in Newport Beach and that it was a result of the Bay
Bridge Pump Station and that Maintenance had already responded to it. I immediately
informed Blake Anderson of the situation and Blake assigned Michelle Tuchman, the
Director of Communications and I to go out to the scene and coordinate the Districts
participation in this event. We went out to the scene immediately. When we arrived
there, the Newport Beach Fire Department had an Incident Command Center in place
and they were in fact responsible for the scene. This is one of the emergency vehicles
they had there and this is the back of the second one where they are fully equipped with
all kinds of papers, forms and telephones. All of us had our portable phones in our
pockets and they were ringing periodically and we'd all take them out to see who was
ringing. They were responsible for coordination of all the activities at the scene. The
Fire Department with the assistance of the Newport Beach Utilities had been around to
all the homes in the area to determine the extent of the back-up into the homes. They
had also provided an initial estimate of how much sewage had spilled into the bay which
they concluded was approximately 6,000 gallons. They had identified a stretch of
homes (you'll find maps at the back of the letter to the Regional Board) which indicates
J1WPDOCt8SW1N96W0TES.02 Page 3
where the effected homes actually were. The Fire Department was going door to door
attempting to either see if the owner was home or to find out how to get a contact and
get into each of the homes. When Michelle and I arrived at the scene there were
representatives from both print and TV media at the scene. All of the major TV stations
were there at some point during the morning. They were interviewing residents, they
were interviewing clean-up crew, during the morning while I was there, I spoke with
representative from each of the major media. I understand, although I have not seen it,
that I was on Channel 2, 4, 7, 9 and OCN. I have to say that we were helped out by the
fact that there was both an execution and a shooting so that our billing was probably
somewhat lower than it might have been otherwise. The reports that we had on the
event were also helped considerably by our approach at the scene. I want to also say
that the Newport Beach folks were very helpful. The Fire Department had the scene
very well under control when we were there. They had information, we had information.
Michelle Tuchman put on green rubber boots and started going door to door with
Monica Messier (sp7) of the Orange County Health Department to talk to each of the
residents about what the situation actually was. Monica was there to talk about health
risks, Michelle was there to be a representative of the Districts and provide names and
phone contacts and do hand holding and whatever else the people needed at that point.
The Fire Department had also prepared a list of clean-up organizations that were
available and there were some crews already on site. So, as the residents were getting
up and as they were saying, "oh my gad, I've got sewage in my home", there were in
fact resources there for them. During the morning and later one we heard from a
number of people that the fact that people were there and were responsive to their
concerns was very helpful. The Fire Department took the major responsibility for
clearing each of the homes for determining which homes had been effected and which
homes had not. They also took information which we had provided to them and they
were also giving information to each of the homeowners. We had asked that each of Th
homeowners contact someone to begin cleaning up the spill as soon as possible,
because of course, one of the most important things is to get the water out of there as
soon as possible to minimize the damage. We also suggest that they contact their own
insurance agencies and the Fire Department also gave them a contact for the Districts. I
had also talk by phone with Blake and with Tom Woodruff early that morning and had
requested that we have a representative from our claims agent, Carl Warren on site as
soon as possible and Ed Garbo from Carl Warren did arrive on site and did begin talking
with residents when he arrived. Let me show you some additional pictures of what was
going on. There was some sewage that was spilled into the bay and the estimate, as
you'll see in the letter, is about 36,000 gallons. The spill into the bay was the least
significant part of what happened. The sewage into the homes is clearly the most
difficult part of this incident. There was sewage on the streets but as Ed Hodges
mentioned there weren't a lot of rags and other kinds of debris in it. There was fecal
matter, there were sewage solids.
SLIDE PRESENTATION
As I mentioned to you earlier, there are companies that are trained in doing this kind of
on-site clean up and this was one of the ones that was there and available and working
with the homeowners. Ultimately, the Fire Department had a list of 16 homes which
JAVVPD0C\BS\M1N9MN0TES.02 Page 4
were affected by the spill to varying degrees. Most of it was confined to the bathroom
areas, so a shower or a tub might have been dirty and contaminated, it might have
overflowed and gotten the throw rugs or whatever else people had in the bathroom. If
there was carpeting in the bathroom that might have been soaked. That was the extent
of the damage in most of the homes. There were some homes where there was
additional flooding outside the bathroom and therefore additional carpeting that was
wet. The quick action that was taken, I think probably minimized damage. There are
2 homes of the 16 homes that the Fire Department identified which were seriously
flooded and sustained more significant damage. If you look at the list from our claims
agent, you'll find that there are 19 homes on there. The discrepancy is that there were
some people that simply had dirty bathtubs and got out the Clorox and the Lysol and did
the cleaning themselves that we probably will not hear from. By noon, all of the activity
at the site had been completed. The Fire Department had closed the Incident
Command Center. Michelle and Monica had been to talk with most of the homeowners
at least once. Mr. Garbo was making his rounds and it was taking him a bit longer
because he needed to talk about claims. There had been someone in each of the
homes that had been affected by that time. One of the things that I was most
concerned about as the morning went on was that there would be homes where we
won't able to identify someone to let us in. We clearly did not want to let that situation
go on for any period of time. Tom Woodruff had worked with Newport Beach on a
contingency plan if we have to get into a home, so we were able to do that as well.
Before I turn over to Bob, I just want to say that we owe a great debt of thanks to
Newport Beach because they were good partners in the response to this, both the Fire
Department and the Utility Department. I think the agencies worked will together. The
Health Department was there and coordinated well with us. The Health Department
wasn't able to get out and post the beaches or post the docks actually where the spill
was affected so the lifeguards came over. It was an example of public agencies
working together and that part of it was very good. With that I'm going to turn it over to
Bob Dolan to talk about the Operations Center issues and the issues that he sees for
the spill.
Bob Ooten: The Operations Department is responsible for 24 hour a day monitoring of
the 22 pump stations. We received the alarm, the clerk called the acting shift supervisor
in, they pulled up the screen and reviewed the graphics and acknowledged the alarm,
basically silencing it. So the low wetwell alarm and their first consideration was to
protect the pumping equipment. Low water alarm means that normally we pump
wastewater over a range and this alarm says that the water level is below that normal
operating range, so their concern was for the equipment. The checked equipment, the
graphic, the equipment was all off and they thought their job was done and they took
now further action on this alarm that night, from 10:00 pm until 6:00 in the morning. A
couple of important issues: a few years ago we computerized the pump station
monitoring system and this so-called low water alarm status was changed in that status.
We used to have a manual system. The low water alarm in the old system was viewed
as a critical alarm and in this system it's viewed as a noncritical alarm. We took no
further action with something this important. Try to understand why the Control Center
Clerk or the Operations Supervisor took no further action from 10:00 pm until 6:00 in the
morning. The acting shift Supervisor questioned the clerk and her training led her
JIWPD0CtBSW➢N96W0TES.02 Page 5
believe that this was not an important alarm. When they receive them in the Control
Center off times, the Pump Station corrects itself and goes back on-line, business as
usual. Their concern is about the equipment, so they did not query the computer further
and dependent upon the computer system to give them system to give them further
information and it did not concerning that pump station. As issue that we're talking
about is existing state law requires operation supervisors and operators of waste or
treatment plants to hold prescribed certification levels. That night the acting shift
supervisor was a Senior Plant Operator and he holds one grade certification level lower
than an Operation Supervisor. I had previously orally cleared this with the State Board
in what I thought was an situation and that's going to be discussed by
the Regional Water Quality Control Board, they are concerned about that issue. The
central issue is whether persons of lower level certification grade can act for their
bosses and it's my opinion that they can. We're discussing any appropriate disciplinary
action, if any is deemed necessary. Our short term recovery plan is two phases, we've
begun retraining of the staff in the Control Center and anyone that is responsible for
monitoring the systems in the Control Center. That began last Friday evening and
continued through the weekend. We've developed a plan to retrain all staff that would
be available for duty in that service in the pump station monitoring system in other parts
of the Control Center and there's other short term training portions. We've also begun
to evaluate as a staff, how we can make the computer system and the operation
protocol more bullet proof in the future. And those same two things, we have an
immediate plan of four weeks (one to four weeks)for those items and them we'll be
evaluated long term measures for operations protocol, computer system modifications,
and future training that we deed necessary.
Ed Hodges: I just wanted to conclude my presentation with telling you that the
maintenance crews responded at 6:38 am and that at 7:00 am we had identified the
problem and had started work on the remediation of that problem. We had installed a
temporary bubbler line and returned the pump station back to automatic operation. By
11:00 am the bubbler tube had been repaired and the station was put back into normal
operation. Bob talked a little bit about some of the recovery plan from the Operations
standpoint, and I wanted to tell you a little bit about what were doing from a
Maintenance standpoint on recovery plan. We immediately initiated a policy to go out
and check all of our bubblers in all of our pump stations. We are a few days away from
completing that task. We have completed the critical pump stations and we have found
no signs of additional problems. We'll be putting that on a more routine check as part of
our normal maintenance. We are also working through some recommendations for
some additional alarm points and as we finalize those we'll be getting with Operations.
In particular right now we're looking at the possibility of a new alarm point that would
identify not only the wetwell level but the pump operation and even the affluent flow, so
that after a certain period of time if it notices no affluent flow going out the pipe, it would
send another alarm to Operations saying, are you sure that this is the action you want to
take. Bob talked to you a little bit about the training that his staff is getting. In working
with Engineering, Dave Ludwin and I are looking at different additional sensing
hardware needs. One of the concepts that we're coming up with is the possibility of a
high level censor that if the water level were to rise and hit that, it would send another
signal or start a pump and get the flow down. We're looking at some of the hardware
JAWPDOMBSWIN96WOTES.02 Page 6
that is available right now and we'll be making a decision shortly on how to best
implement that. One of the other things that probably goes a little unnoticed is, we had
a big debriefing session after this was over and put all this stuff down. All of this sluff is
going into our Integrated Emergency Waste Response Plan. With that I'll turn it to
Nancy.
Nancy Wheatley: As you can imagine the response to this is far from over and let me
just conclude with two comments. Michelle is continuing to hear daily, perhaps hourly
from homeowners with concems. One of the big issues for people is that they have had
sewage in their home and they are worried to what that means to them. We have hired
a Hygienist to help answer those questions so that people feel that they have someone
independent that they can go to and that there's a resource available to them. The
other issue is the issue of our regulatory compliance with our NPDES permit.
Unfortunately, this event happened right after a permit violation for an instantaneous
level of settleable solids which occurred on Sunday, February 18. Again, our response
from a technical prospective in terns of meeting reporting deadlines and various other
things was somewhat less than stellar and so we need to look at those issues. That
event of the exceedence of a permit limit and this event of a sewage spill are both
reportable to the regulatory agencies; the Regional Water Quality Control Board and the
U.S.E.P.A. They have permit implications and we take those very seriously. The
Regional Board has been on site from Thursday through today, not necessarily ever
hour of every day, but staff from the Regional Water Quality Control Board has been
interviewing Districts staff, they have been interviewing individuals without their
supervisors there and have been gathering a great deal of information about what went
on. They've reviewed our letter, they've reviewed our calculation and we will be hearing
further from them. We expect that they will come and talk with us when they have
completed their investigation and we can discuss further what the possibilities are but
we do expect to hear further from the Regional Board and potentially from EPA and as I
said, the event is not yet over and we will keep you informed. If there's time, we would
also take questions, or we can hold them for later.
TLW: We have not received any claims from any of the 17 homeowners. We had Carl
Warren out there the first day within hours making contact and they all have their
information. Lets talk in terms of generics here, in terms of the responsibility of the
Districts from a legal prospective. The first starting block is, just because there is a
sewage spill does not mean that the Districts is liable for the damage - now that's a very
tough proposition to swallow from members of the public because it's very ugly
situation. But you've heard me present that previously where there's instances where
the Districts had no occasion to know that there was some responsibility, that there was
something wrong, that we were doing something wrong and therefore, the back up has
caused the damage. The laws pretty clear on it, that we are responsible. That's the
starting block, however, you loose that position if in fact, it is shown that the Districts
facilities were known to have a defect or something of that nature and we didn't do
anything about it. That doesn't apply to this case. There was absolutely no knowledge,
no warning whatsoever. The slide that Ed's shown here has been described to me how
you have to go and find it by taking off the cover and hanging a guy
upside down into the wetwell, look behind a comer block and then he'd see that this
JAWPDOMBSUN96WOTES.02 Page 7
hose was broken. There's probably no negligence there. The other thing is if in fact,
we were aware that it was there, and there was something wrong, and didn't respond.
There in lies the question whether the alarm system on the computer is sufficient. The
General Manager has put the word out, conferred with me and all, that the first and
foremost is to basically address this with the people who are out there and try to get it
resolved. There are three basic positions: one is to tell all 17 people to send all there
bills no matter what they are and we'll pay for them; the second position is don't pay any
of the bills and we would figure out who's at fault and make everybody carry the load;
and the third as you can imagine is somewhere in between. As Nancy and the staff
have pointed out to you, most of these 14 or 15 of these, the damages are really quite
minimal in comparison, somewhere between maybe $500 and $5,000 depending on
carpet cleaning or carpet damage and it needs replacement. The first thing that's been
done is to get someone out there and get all the places cleaned up, that controls, limits
and mitigates the damages. We're recommending, your claims resolution has authority
for a committee of the General Manager, Finance Director and myself to settle any
claims up to $50,000., so there's authority to make these things happen and the
General Managers recommendation which I join in is, for the small claims we'd spend
more arguing about them, we want to get them paid and make those people happy and
help them get back to there normal life. By the same token, I've advised the staff
manager repeatedly about this in the last 48 hours, that we have to protect the Districts
position against the remote, and we have no indication of this at the present time, but I
can just tell you from past experience from public agencies that my office represents,
that there's a lot of people who could take advantage, called the proverbial rip-off or
scam, and say well I want my house rebuilt or say, all of a sudden my grand piano is
missing - preposterous claims. We're going to protect the Districts position on that and
it could conceivably be that, if there are huge claims out there, that we'll be in some
position of having to contest it and figure out who's at fault. There are at least two other
potential points of responsibility other than the Districts. Part of this project is in a
condominium that is built low, and they have an on-site pump station that has to lift the
waste out of these places, high enough to get into the City of Newport Beach sewer line
that comes over to our pump station. Their station was required and each home was
required by the City of Newport Beach to have an anti-backflow device so that if sewage
backs up, it hits the valve and doesn't go further, it doesn't go into the houses. You just
saw that R got into 17 houses, what happened to those back-Flow valves? And what
happened at the pump station? Those are things we don't know yet. We're exploring
them, and I'm just point them out. We're going to work to get these resolved, but we're
going to protect the Districts position and not unduly pay outrageous sums. It the
Districts Directors have any question about the policy of paying any nominal claims,
then I'd like review it with you in Closed Session. Otherwise, the Managers intent is to
try to get rid of the very nominal claims and address the major claims on a case by case
basis. Don and I think we can bring this to closure.
VJC: This is a District 5 item only but it was brought to the whole board because
Districts were involved.
J:=PD0C\BS\IVI1N96\N0TES.02 Page 8
DFM: That is the extent of the report. Public relations is an important aspect of this.
We think that, as Tom said, most of the claims will be relatively small, you're reminded
that we're self insured. There may be one or two claims that are substantial, but
beyond that we think they're not. We wonder why we haven't heard yet or seen a claim,
but we haven't and we'll see. So again, if you have any concerns about us settling as
many of these as we can as quickly as we can, let us know.
I would like Mahin now to make that presentation that was done as CASA, we think it
would be of interest to you.
Presentation by Mahin Talebi and Adriana Renescu on "How to be Business
Friendly".
Nancy Wheatley: Can I add one thing? The program has won awards, as I think the
Directors as well aware but there's additional recognition which is actually happening
this Friday. USEPA on a national level has a program called the Common Sense
Initiative, which is attempting to take good ideas from around the county and promote
them as a way of maintaining environmental quality while reducing regulation and they
have called our Source Control folks to ask if they could come out here and talk with
them about our program, recognizing that it's one of the best programs in the country.
ff6c - Report by General Counsel:
TLW: Just briefly a couple of items. Just for information, we've put in agenda packages
that were mailed to you the Annual Litigation Status Report both where we had to
prosecute some of the administrative proceedings for Source Control that you just heard
about as well as the defense of the others. If anybody has any questions about that,
please feel free to let me know and I'll be happy to do it.
Also, we put a separate flyer in the folder tonight for distribution on this big lawsuit that
we have here on the river, we have 29 lawsuits and we managed to get out of those
without having to contribute anything -the total settlement was over $2 million but we
got the Districts out without paying anything. However, we have occurred a great
amount of legal expense and at one point the insurance company said, 'yeah no
problem we'll pay it , after we fought with them for a long time, but then they never did.
And so, it got to the braking point a couple of weeks ago but we're pleased to announce
that finally, with our threats, finally submitted a check to the Districts, which you've seen
here in your package, for just under $50,000 which reimburses the Districts 100% of the
cost that were incurred in the defense.
On Friday of last week, I had occasion to be in Sacramento and meet with
Assemblyman Kerpringles(sp?) staff relative to EB2109 which is a comprehensive bill in
which he's proposing to take every water and sewer agency in this county and form a
new agency called the Orange County Water and Sanitation District with ten directly
elected Directors, two from each of the five geographical boundaries of the supervisorial
districts. The meeting was intended to basically provide information relative to our
Districts, how they're organized and how they're structured and the plans that are under
study for the consolidation from where we are now to even one single district, as well as
to try to gather where the assemblyman was proceeding on this. It was a very
rewarding investment, we had a hour with the staff and we could have taken longer if
we needed it. We got to present and talk about every issue. The focus is principally
J.'UPDOMMMIN96WOTES.02 Page 9
one major area and that is the pending application before LAFCO. The City of Garden
Grove and the Garden Grove Sanitary District has been pending for 25 months.
LAFCO just continued it again until May, which has really got the speaker of the
assembly outraged and I will tell you in no uncertain terms, the bill he has proposed is
essentially just to get around LAFCO. By the way, parenthetically, I'll tell you there's
another bill pending in the legislation which is designed to just abolish all LAFCO
statewide - that's not going to make it anywhere, but there's a bill there.
The second area of focus is the public agencies who have significant excess reserve
funds, especially if they're invested in such things as real estate or whatever nature. He
raised the subject, not me.
Thirdly, it's the consolidation of the small water districts of the south
county which is an area focused. It was a bit comforting to have them indicate that
really these sanitation districts are not the subject of or a focus although as I said, this
bill/some bill is going to go through and if there's no effort on the part real interested
party, we could get caught in front of the steam roller. The speakers bill is limited to
Orange County and you can't realistically expect any member of the assembly to cut
against their speaker for a bill that has no plus or minus to them in Alameda County or
Los Angeles County or any other county. They did acknowledge that the bill in its
present form will not be the final bill, that's a given. We'll keep you posted on that, it's a
bill of extraordinary importance to this District and they've promised to keep an open
mind.
#7 - Minutes deemed approved
#8 - Payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts
Roll Call Vote - motion carries.
#9(b)(c) - Consent Calendar
VJC: Please note that item #9a has been removed from the Consent Calendar.
Motion carries.
#11fa
VJC: Committee minutes. We've lumped all the Committee Minutes into one item. Is
there a motion on Item#11 a? Moved, seconded, deemed approved. What we're going
to do here is start with the Committee Chairman who is going to give a report of the
committee activity. We'll start off with Chairman of the PD&C Committee, John.
#11(b)(1
John Collins, Committee Chair: The item before us this evening deals with the
maintenance building at Plant No. 2 which is approximately $5 million. An areas for fire
protection signage and water distribution modification systems at Plants No. 1 and 2,
this is to insure that we will not have backflow Fountain
Valley. modification facility, this is a replacement facility to use from
a cost effective and less hazardous chemical and emergency
J:\WPD0CtBSW11N90W0TES.02 Page 10
disinfectant. The November PDC Committee authorized
7 bids were received, the bids ranged from $13 million to a little over$16 million. The
successful low bidder was Sverdrup Civil, Inc. There was correction, as it was noted in
your Directors package, it was an addition correction so it was not anything of any
importance, so that correction was made and again there bid is $13,196,500.00. The
Engineering estimate on this was $15,200,000. There are also two addendums to this
item that were caused by the request of the City of Huntington Beach. One was to
extend the bid so that we could make those request changes and we did so by one
week. And the other one was to
So the recommendation this evening is Item A, which is the approval of 1
and 2, and B which is the award of contract.
If there are no questions, I'd like to make the motion to approve 11 81, B, C & D.
Seconded - Deemed Approved.
VJC: Report of the OMTS Committee.
#11(b) (2)
Pat McGuigan, Committee Chair: As you all probably remember back in September.
We submitted a proposal to SCAQMD for a rather interesting project having to do with
Compressed Natural Gas. Part of that project is being done now in advance to provide
the activity that is necessary for some long range planning so that when everything
does come together it will be on line at the appropriate time.
The two items that are on your agenda are kind of linked together. The first part is an
actual contract that will be submitted that will link together all of the appropriate parties
for the heavy-duty truck demonstration project. Part of that will be reimbursed in the
amount of$447,000. by SCAQMD (that's part (a) on your agenda). The second part is
a MOU between the appropriate parties and because we are doing it before the 1st of
March, AQMD is giving us a bonus of$15,000. So, I would like to move that we
recommend that adoption of these two items: the signing of the contract (which I've
already done as District No. 1 Chair), and also the MOU that will provide us with
$15,000. That was a motion Mr. Chairman.
VJC: The motion is item 11(2)(a)(b) -motion and seconded, deemed approved.
#11(b)(31471
VJC: George Brown is ill tonight and asked me to make the report from the FAHR
Committee. There are a number of items, Items 11 (3) - (7). I'll go through them briefly.
The first item is a motion to recommend extending benefit coverage to employees who
work less thana 40 hour week. This was passed by the committee on a 4 -2 vote, it
was not a unanimous consent. We have staff here if there is additional discussion, but
I'd like to go through all the items.
J:\WPDOC\BS\N11N96WOTES.02 Page 11
The second item was a recommendation to approve the joint agreement with the
County of Orange, the official Investment pool participants committee. That passed with
one nay vote by John Gullixson.
The third item considered was renewal of boiler and machinery insurance and the
committee recommended the selection of Kemper Insurance Group or American
Manufacturers Mutual.
The next item is the report from the Treasurer which talked about, number one, a review
of the Districts portfolio, we had an outside consultant come in and review to make sure
our investments were per the investment policy adopted by the Board. We also had a
report on the success, I believe the annualized rate of return for the quarter covered
was approximately 12%, so we had a 3% during the quarter, that's because a portion of
the Districts funds were invested long term and as you know there's been a
considerable recovery in the longer term - part of the yield curve.
The next item was a mid-year report that was prepared by staff looking at the
performance of the half year. We had considerable discussion about this and there's
some additional work on it.
The final item being considered was that we reviewed the budget assumptions
presented by staff in preparation of next years budget. The committee made one
recommendation and that was the interest rate assumption and that was adjusted and
recommended here.
Is there any discussion on any of the items? If not, I would make the motion of approval
on Items 11(3) -(7). Discussion requested re, Items 11(3). 1 would then like to modify
the motion to approve Items 11(4) - (7). Deemed approved.
#11 fbl(31
Mike Peterman: The recommendation before you tonight is to approve a pro-rated part-
time benefit using the following formula of 20-29 hours employees would receive a
benefit equivalent of 50% of the benefit from 30 - 39 hours employees would receive a
benefit equivalent of 75%. What are the benefits to the Districts for approving this?
They are two-fold I believe. One is to reduce overtime by increasing temporarily part-
time hours on a temporary basis and we can avoid the cost of paying time and a half
and overtime. But the second point, and that is what I believe is the most important,
and that is job-sharing. I think most of you are familiar with job-sharing. But we have
an example in our Department. We have one of our top compensation analysts who
wants to return to work on a part-time basis (20 hours) and she is in charge right now of
compensation and performance management. I can break-off the performance
management piece, by splitting the position, hiring someone in at the bottom of the
range saving about $7,500 per year and still keep one of my valuable employees happy
and accommodate her needs returning from matemity. That's what I believe is the
biggest benefit. This is not precedence setting. 38% of the cities in Orange County
have some form of part-time benefits and 75% of the private sector also does this
according to a survey that we have. Part-time benefits provide management with just
JAWPD0VBSWIIN96W0TES.02 Page 12
one more tool to affectively and efficiently manage the workforce by attracting and
retaining the most valuable employees.
VJC: The other side of the issue - I believe in the committee the discussion on the con
side was that instead of doing this blanket with all employees, there was consideration
that this should be done on a case by case basis for the convenience of the Districts as
decided by the General Manager and not be blanket applied to all existing part-time
employees. That was where the no vote was coming from.
Sheldon Singer: Has there been any numbers for the last six months or last year on
the difference between overtime and if we had this on total costs?
VJC: I believe as I recall, there was a $13,000. increased cost to the Districts by
extending the benefits.
JAW: That's right, but we've also done some analysis of how much overtime we might
be able to save and I know Bob Ooten looked at that and as I recall, Bob you had a
number of about $50,000 in overtime cost savings.
Questionstcomments could not be heard.
Mike Peterman: We have 13 part-time employees right now and the projected impact is
anywhere from $38,000 to $50,000 depending on how many hours they work and at
what level of the formula they take place in.
JAW: That's the increase in cost of the consequence benefits and that might be offset
by savings for example in overtime in Operations and savings for example, that Mike
pointed out in job sharing. So, it looks like to me that it's probably a wash, but it
provides management with more flexibility.
Questions/comments could not be heard.
JAW: Let me respond to that. While we could apply this on a case to case basis,
currently, the policies and procedures available to the executive staff don't allow for any
type of pro-rated benefit. So, there is not a discretion now in our policies and
procedures. If you wanted to give us the discretion that would be fine, but right now the
policies written in a way that do not provide that discretion.
VJC: The vote on the Committee was to recommend this -the opposing people
recommend that it be granted to the General Manager on a case by case basis and not
a blanket approval. What's your pleasure.
Discussion by John Collins could not be heard.
VJC: Motion is to recommit to Committee for legal opinion and financial analysis.
Motion, seconded - 1 opposition -we will send it back to the Committee.
JAWPDOMBSNIN96WOTES.02 Page 13
Presentation by Controller, Mike White re Mid-Year Financial and Operations
Report and 1996/97 Budget Assumptions.
#13Ib1
VJC: Executive Committee Report -we discussed the County Commingled Investment
Pool, the recommendation after discussion with a 7 -2 vote was that the Committee
recommends to the Board was to accept the County's plan of readjustment. Are there
any questions/comments?
Don Griffin - comments could not be heard
John Collins -the choice for us this evening is a binary choice. We've already
selected the "A", do we go ahead with this plan or do we back out of this plan?
it will net us or
could net us 100%. If we say that we do not want to do this, and do not ratify this plan t
this time, we could end up subsequently less than even "B" selection because it could
put us out of the category.
John Gullixson -comments could not be heard.
BPA: The action before you today is regarding the Joint Agreement not the Plan of
Adjustment, although the Plan of Adjustment, when eventually adopted in this calendar
year will reflect many of the elements that are present in the Joint Agreement. The Joint
Agreement specifically protects the rights of all third parties including the Option B
Participants. The Joint Agreement is neutral with respect to the Option B Participants.
Under the Plan of Adjustment the County has provided a reserve account for the
potential eventually of the Option B Participants successfully suing the County and its
causes of action against the County. Early on in the summer of 1995, after the Pooled
Participants had split into the Option A and Option B camps, there was considerable
discussion between the Attorneys of the Option A Participants and the Option B
Participants of how to move forward because we were no longer on the same course of
events. The Option B Attorneys asked, and we agreed, that the Option B Participants
Attorneys would negotiate on there own behalf with respect to the Plan of Adjustment
and other issues. The Joint Agreement is for Option A Participants only and since we
were not negotiating on behalf of the Option B Participants, there was no way that we
could address their situation in the Joint Agreement with the exception of making it
neutral with respect to their treatment. That is the facts of the Joint Agreement. It is
neutral with respect to Option B Participants. What the Joint Agreement does is it does
remove recourse against the County the Option A Participants who
approved this Joint Agreement. That has significant importance in the County's ability
to restructure its debt this summer. It must have those allowed claims removed from
their account as part of the restructure. The other thing that it does is that it does
provide a significant amount of new cash to the County as part of their restructuring for
this summer. It's imperative to all of us, that the bond holders and the vendors of the
County are ultimately dealt with in the outstanding issues that would be settled in the
middle of this year by virtue of the Joint Agreement. The Joint Agreement reflects the
J:\WPD0CSS1tv11N96W0TESo2 Page 14
legislation that was approved in Sacramento in September which took about two weeks
to get that through. The delay that occurred back in the summer in the approval of the
Joint Agreement was because the original draft of it as it went up to Sacramento was
shifted enough so that it had to be re-drafted. What the Joint Agreement for the County
Sanitation Districts is it advances our position in the litigation proceeds from Merrill
Lynch and others and you'll have decide for yourself what's the most likely method that
the Sanitation Districts will have any return on the continuing loses from the investment
pool. Will it be from the funds within the County Government that do not exist or
through the potential of revenues from the litigation against Merrill Lynch and others.
What will occur for the Sanitation Districts if this Joint Agreement is approved is that
we'll advance our position, we'll lose recourse on those allowed claims, which is a
significant thing to give up, for the County as an agent to fully allow the claims, is a
major hurdle that you have to get through in court. So it is a significant give up on our
side. But we will get that advancement in the litigation proceeds, and we will receive
approximately $8 million in a combination of County administered accounts and withheld
proceeds which are part of the deal that will come over once the Joint Agreement has
been approved by Judge Ryan. With respect of the issue of trust, the court of
jurisdiction is Judge Ryan. Judge Ryan ruled that trust did not exist and it is purely
speculative on anyone part in terms of what reversal may eventually occur down
stream. The court of jurisdiction has ruled that there trust, and I could tell you
that the Orange County Investment Pool Committee, in pulling out the 77% of the losses
in May, would not be happening today, if Ryan's ruling had not been delayed. We as
Option A Participants receive 77% of the cash back, it was still existing in the bank and
another 3% amounted to another$13 million. This agency has significantly advanced
its cash position by being Option A Participants and it's my recommendation from what
I've seen in my year and a few month on the Investment from Merrill
Lynch and others. The first go to the Investment Pool Participants
with the schools having super priority for the first $55 million.
Barry Denes: Comments/questions could not be heard.
TLW: A couple of things could happen. We have a major piece but not enough to
effectively veto the approval of the Joint Agreement. Our slice isn't that big. But, if we
did not sign the agreement, the answer is No, we do not become a "B", in fad, what is
going to happen is there would be a third class still out there. Under the terms of the
Plan of Adjustment as they are going to pick up the plans of this Joint Agreement, the
A-'s would not get to share then in the litigation proceeds and they also would have to
probably pursue their rights independently through their own litigation to enforce the
terms of the first settlement agreement of April. One of the other points that hasn't been
raised here in terms of the proverbial wit pro quo that has been exchanged is that the
County, as a part of this agreement, has agreed that it will not endorse or advocate or
support or request any legislation to take away either property taxes or other revenues
from the cities or the special districts and as we know, there are a handful of bills put in
last year and needless to say, this District could be a big target of that and that's part of
the deal is that the County will withdraw and not seek that legislation to raid those
revenues. So that's got a monetary value.
JAWPDOCtMMINMNOTES.02 Page 15
Barry Denes: Further comments /questions could not be heard.
VJC: Barry, I think that we have lost our ability to file with the lawsuit against the County
when we selected to be an "A".
TLW: One of the provisions of the settlement agreement addresses some of the
legislation that was enacted last year, and that is if there is not a substantial approval of
the Plan of Adjustment, the Governor gets to appoint a trustee. That trustee is
empowered with great authority including structuring a Plan of Adjustment that he
carves out and also he has or would have authority to restructure any of the claims,
whether they be A's, or B's or A-'s. So, all the parts are going to of the mercy of the
trustee who will make whatever deal it takes to make the whole thing go away which is
a total unknown. No one in this room, no one in the County, no one anywhere knows
what is going to happen, in that case, the best thing we could do is guess.
John Collin: It sounds like your on a effort to get to go to the B category. I
don't think that's going to happen. I think if we have to look at the issue at hand, it's a
decision, it's binary, it's one or the other. We either at this point ratify the Joint
Agreement and give up what we give up and accept what we can accept or we don't
and go into a but from what I understand it's less of a decision. No
body likes this bankruptcy, no one likes the decisions that we have to make. We don't
like it in the cities, we don't like it at the Sanitation Districts, I know the Supervisors don't
like it from their standpoint. We have to make a decision based upon the facts that are
presented to us. Given the facts that are given to us in the Joint Agreement and the
back up of what we've discussed, my decision is to accept and ratify this decision
because it gives us something, in my mind, better than the consequences of not doing
it. Both of them, are unfair perhaps, both of them are unacceptable perhaps, but given
the lesser of the two evils, it you want to look at it that way, I think that we should ratify
it.
That's a motion. Seconded.
VJC: Jan did you want to make a comment?
Jan DeBay: Comment could not be heard.
John Gullixson: Comments could not be heard.
VJC: Any other comments -All those opposed? 4 opposed. The chair rules this
approved.
#12
VJC: We will move onto Item #12.
JAVVPD0C\BSWIIN96W0TES.02 Page 16
DFM: This is the continued discussion about the connection fees that you had before
you, that you've had before you for about a year. Nancy Wheatley will address the
issue and than once she has made her Staff Report, I would suggest that the gentlemen
from Garden Grove then address you on their concerns and then Nancy could respond
to that.
Nancy Wheatley: Given the late hour, I will be very brief. There is a Staff Report in the
package. As we have tried to make our way out of excess capacity charge. I guess I
would observe that in some ways maybe sewage spills are a little better that excess
capacity charges. I haven't been here quite so often on them. They're not better for the
residents though. As we have tried to maintain the status quo and move forward with
the new strategic plan which includes an opportunity to look all of the connection
charges and to try and develop a fair system for all of our customers both residential
and business. We continue to come across in how various kinds of
business and industrial and commercial customers have been treated in the past. That
was in fact what led staff to develop the excess capacity charge which was
recommended to you last spring. With the repeal of the excess capacity charge and the
return to the previous method, it turns out that the previous method had treated existing
businesses and new businesses differently. New businesses were not charged an
additional capital connection fee regardless of how much they increase their flow,
whereas, a new business which came on line, if it was more than 50,000 gallons would
be charged the connection fee. So you could have a new business come in at 51,000
gallons and pay a substantial sum of money and you could have an existing business
increase their flow by 500,000 gallons and not pay anything at all. We concluded that it
was unfair. We then had two choices: 1. is to charge the existing business; 2. not to
charge the new business at least temporarily. We concluded, given all of the difficulty
and implementation that the best thing to do at this point is to place a moratorium on
these types of fees, pending the completion of the strategic plan in the capital
connection study. We are recommending that there be no charges assessed until that
study is completed. Al that time, we will have a system in place and it will be applied to
all businesses fairly. Any new business which comes on line between now and the time
that the new charging system is completed would be told that there would be a charge
in the future. It will not be a retroactive charge so they won't have to pay two years at
one time, but they will have to pay the fee at that time. We anticipate, although we don't
know at this point that the charge will be an annual charge and that it will be accessed
based upon flow. If flow increases it would go up, and if flow decreased it would go
down. One final point, the recommendation is that, for new businesses which move to
the County now, they need to know what the magnitude of that charge would be. What
we have proposed is that we would guarantee those businesses that on an annual basis
their charge would be no higher than the charge which would be accessed based on the
excess capacity charge calculation. That's the fee that we repealed amortized over 10
years. Whatever the annual charge is, it would be no higher than that fee. We
recommended using the excess capacity charge calculation because we continue to
believe that it fairly reflects the Districts costs of providing capital facilities for
businesses to handle flow and solids. That's the substance of the recommendation and
if I can answer any questions, I would be happy to.
J UPDOOBSNIN96WOTES.02 Page 17
VJC: Any questions of the staff? Okay. We have two gentlemen here to discuss this
item.
Mark Asturias, City of Garden Grove: I am here representing the Mayor and the City
Council of the City of Garden Grove. I am the Economic Development Manager for the
City of Garden Grove. We are supportive of everything that the Districts is doing in
regards to the excess capacity charge, in fact, we applaud and support your current
efforts and the recommendation that's before you tonight. What we are asking for
however, is some further relief regarding the excess capacity charge method of
calculation. We believe that with your previous policy, capacity charge calculation which
was substantially lower than what is currently being proposed. As an example, tonight
we have a business here who would have been charged under your previous policy
somewhere in the area of$660,000. Under the proposed method they would be
charged in excess of$1,400,000. So what we are asking basically is that if you, in fact,
were to adopt the recommendation that is before you, that you establish the method of
placing a cap in regards to the rate at your previous policy not at the proposed method
of calculation that the staff has before you tonight. That is in fact the essence of my
presentation. We are here supporting a business that is trying to move into our
community and that is House Foods. House Foods is here tonight and the
representative from their offices would like to speak to you on it. We are supporting
them in their efforts. We hope that you would listen to them as well as listen to us and
in fact, approve the recommendation before you, and consider our request to modify the
method of rate calculation. Any questions?
John Collins - questions/comments could not be heard.
Mark Asturias: We are working with House Foods. They are not within a project area -
I am the redevelopment agency. They are not within the redevelopment project area.
We are working with them on expedition of permitting and relative to some city fees, we
are providing some offsets at a city level. But, we can't obviously assist them on a fee
that is in an excess of$800,000 differential between what would have originally been
applied to them versus the new calculation that is being proposed.
Richard Hertel, House Foods: I represent House Foods, a Japanese Tofu
Manufacturer. They are moving from Los Angeles, perhaps some of you are familiar
with them. They bought land in Garden Grove about three years ago. Tonight House
Foods wanted to go on record, to ask the Board of Directors in their case specifically, to
waive any excess capacity fee for their particular use. The reasons being are as
follows: 1) House Foods has been a corporate citizen in Garden Grove for three years
now. 2) Prior to buying the property, they hired a consulting firm by the name of John
Brown, who is a renowned group of consultants that did a lot of the due diligence for
House Foods, part of which was meeting with the different governmental authorities,
including the Sanitation Districts. They were advised that there were certain fees
involving connection fees, none of which were excess capacity fees. In fact, I've got
some notes that say, basically how they determine what the fee was which was based
on a square footage equated based on their building size about $67,000. The current
ordinance does not stipulate an absolute excess capacity fee or any formula to calculate
J:IWPD0C\BSWINg8W0TES.02 Page 18
such a fee, however, it does discuss on a case by case basis, some fee may be
charged. The Sanitation District is discussing a fee for House Foods based on their
usage. They use about 95,000 gallons per day of affluent. Based on that, there's been
a equivalent dwelling unit method of calculation which was determined by, I believe it
was staff, saying they would have to be paying a fee of about $660,000. - a big surprise
to my client who had no idea that would be a possibility. The Sanitation Districts, over
the years, I believe the case by case issue started in about 1983 and since that time it
hasn't consistently implemented any kind of an excess capacity fee. In fact, out of the
about 80 or 85 companies in Orange County that have flow in excess of 50,000 gallons,
I don't know of any private companies that have had to pay an excess capacity fee.
The Sanitation Districts staff advised us in a previous meeting that many of the
companies over the years, that have been here for 20 to 25 years, who use many
millions of gallons of water per day and sewer, that a portion of that fee has always
been applied toward capital improvements. I think that House Foods prospective is that
they will certainly agree to the same formula that Kimberly Clark for example, who uses
2,000,000 gallons a day, would pay. Whatever the fair charges for the entire people of
Orange County is what they'd like to see. So, it's House Foods position as follows:
Sanitation Districts should allow companies to obtain sewer permits during this study
period without any excess capacity charge, thus, an existing connection or existing user
will not be subject to any excess capacity charge. The logic here is clear-
inconsistencies in the past in charging this fee have prompted the 18-month study. Until
such time as a new ordinance is adopted, the Sanitation Districts should process all
sewer applications as they have in the past, fairly, and without excessive user fees.
Next, the Sanitation Districts never disclosed to House Foods, during the purchasing of
the property, any formula relating to a capacity charge and I've got some notes to that
effect that I can hand out to all of you as well. House Foods understands the needs for
the Sanitation Districts to upgrade their system and have the people and the heavy
users in Orange County pay their fair share. House Foods wants to do that. They have
no problem paying the standard fees that all other companies in Orange County have
paid over the years. Again, it was a pretty big surprise for them after doing a lot of due
diligence that this fee would come up. We would appreciate that the Board this evening
waive this on behalf of House Foods. In conclusion, I know you have this on the
agenda, and you can make a decision on it. In a spirit on fairness and equity
throughout, and a consistency throughout the users within Orange County, we propose
that the excess capacity fee be waived in the case of House Foods.
VJC: For discussion. I have a question of Nancy. If this business was in Los Angeles
and is currently in Los Angeles, what is the Los Angeles equivalent excess capacity
charge and fees?
Nancy Wheatley: The research that staff had done, which was presented at earlier staff
reports, is that the Los Angeles City and County fees are similar and somewhat higher
than Orange County's excess charge which is the one that you repealed. San Diego
County is considerably higher than ours. There are some small county's to the east
which are less than ours.
JAWPDOMMMIN96WOTES.02 Page 19
VJC: So, House Foods has operated in Los Angeles for a period of years, and
therefore, would have been aware of what the excess capacity charge and the fee
structure was in Los Angeles?
Nancy Wheatley: Yes.
John Collins - comments/questions could not be heard.
Nancy Wheatley: There are were two different discussions. One would have been with
Garden Grove and Director Singer can discuss that. I have talked with staff who
discussed this matter at the time with House Foods. I am told by staff, including the
previous Director of Technical Services because I was of course not here, that while
they did not discuss formula for excess capacity, her best recollection is that they
mentioned the fact that excess capacity charges would be applied to high flow users. I
don't believe that there are any good notes on that conversation and I don't believe that
staff had any particular knowledge of what the flow was.
Sheldon Singer-comments could not be heard.
Nancy Wheatley: Of the million + dollars, I would say on the order of 60 - 70% of that is
associated with the solids with the . The much smaller proportion
of it is associated with the flow. We have offered to House Foods to put them in touch
with Anaheim Citrus or Hunt Wesson to talk about those kinds of things and to work with
them in terms of technical assistance to try and figure out if they can reduce the solids.
Because by far, the largest part of that $1.2 million fee is for solids.
VJC: Any further questions? Staff recommendation that has been moved and
seconded is that we hold the collection of excess capacity charges in advance. The
maximum that it would be for anyone in the interim period and that the staff will come
back with a recommendation and will not exceed that maximum amount at the
completion of the study.
Richard Hertel: I just wanted to ask a question, Mr. Chairman. May I ask a question of
staff and maybe the Board of Directors as well. How many privately held companies in
the last 10 years have paid an excess capacity charge on a case by case basis?
Nancy Wheatley: That information was provided to Mayor Broadwater. I believe going
there were five companies, one of which appears to be a private company, the others
are principally desalters.
Richard Hertel: So, that's one in the last 10 years?
Comments / Questions could not be heard.
Nancy Wheatley: In the last 6 or 7 years, there have been 5 entities in excess of
50,000 gallons which have come on line. There is not a match between those that have
J:\WPD0CtBS\M1N96W0TES.02 Page 20
paid an excess capacity charge because I think one of them was paid as early as 1978.
So there is not a match. Mr. Hertel's point is: the Sanitation Districts has not been fair in
the way it has accessed excess capacity charges against high volume dischargers and
that is true. That is what prompted staff to propose the excess capacity charge. When
he says you haven't been treating everyone consistently, he's absolutely right. There's
no argument there. The high volume dischargers have not been paying their fair share
of the capital costs as compare with each of the residential customers who have come
on line. Residential customers have paid proportionately more that these high volume
dischargers.
VJC: So, effectively, the residential customers have subsidized the large dischargers.
Nancy Wheatley: Yes.
John Collins - comments could not be heard.
VJC: I believe there is a study coming back in an 18-month period? And it's been
approved by the Board? It's 18 months from about 2 months ago?
JAW: We just awarded the contract in March, so it will be 18 months from the contract
award approximately.
VJC: So about a year and a half. The questions been called - all in favor? Any
opposed? I see unanimous approval of the Directors here.
#14
VJC: I'm going to ask the staff to update us on the Landfill in a written report and we'll
go to Executive Session.
We have two items that are going to take about five minutes total and I'm going to hold
Tom to that.
Move to Closed Session.
J:\WPDOGBSUNg6WOTES.02 Page 21
COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS. 1 , 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 , 13 AND 14
OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
MINUTES
JOINT BOARD MEETING
FEBRUARY 28, 1996
TRICTS OF p992
� c
v a
9pTFcl�N6�THE
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018
ROLL CALL
` An adjourned meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1. 2.3.
5,6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County,California, was held on February 28, 1996, at 7:30 p.m., in
the Dishnets'Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation His roll was
called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Not. 1,2,3,5,6,7, 11. 13,and 14
` as lallows:
ACTIVE ALTERNATE
DIRECTORS DIRECTORS
DISTRICT NO.l: �JL Pet McGuigan,Chair _ Ted R.Mariana
James M.Fem/man,Chair pro tam _ Arthur Pony
Z Mark A.Murphy _ Joanne Co..
_L Thomas R.Saherelli Jim Potts
1 Roper Stanton _ William G.Steiner
DISTRICT NO.2: s_ Jam CMunn,Chair _ George Boon
y Daniel T.Welch,Chair pro tam _ John M.Gulliseon
Z Barry Danes — Bob Bell
Z Bumle Dunlap _ Glenn Porker
Norman Z.Grommet, _ Carol Downey
1 James H.Fiore Steve Anderson
x Pat McGuigan Ted R.Moreno
Mark A.Murphy Jet.Co..
y China Nomy _ Don Bankhaad
Sheldon Singer George L.Vilest
_IL Roger Stanton Whom G.Steiner
Bob Zembl Tom Daly
DISTRICT NO.h y Sal A.Saphen,Chair Harry M.Damon
y Bumie Dunlap, Chair pro tam Glenn Porker
1 Wager Bowman Gall Kerry
y George Brown Marilyn Bruce findings
Z John Collins George Seen
t James H.Flora Shave Anderson
Z Don R.Griffin Pass Marshall
3� Victor Leipzig Rabin Bauer
_L Wally Linn Eva G.Miner
i Pat McGuigan Ted R.Moreno
_JL Cana Henry Dan BeNhe nd
y Margie L.N. James V.Evans
f_ Sheldon Singer George L.Zlaket
Roper Shown William G.Stei er
J_ Charles Sylvia Robert WahNnam
i Bob Zemel Tom Daly
DISTRICT NO.B: Jan Debby,Chair John C.Cox,Jr.
y Wlliam G.Steiner,Chair pm tam Boger Bunton
John C.Co.,Jr. �_ An Debay
DISTRICT NO.B: James M.Ferryman,Chair Arthur Perry,
1 An Debby.Chair pro him Joan C.Cox.Jr.
1 William G.Steiner Roper Stamen
DISTRICT NO.7: Barry Hammond,Chair Mike Ward
y Thames R.Si Chair pro Ism Jim Porte
JL Jan Debby _ Joe C.Co..Jr.
y James M.Ferrymen _ Arthur Perry
Pal MCGwgan Ted R.Mo..
y Mark A.Murphy Joan.CoonD
William G.Steiner Roger Stamgn
DISTRICT W.11: Victor Leipzig, Chair Ralph Bauer
SNrley DaMalf,Chair pro tam Ralph Bauer
Roper Stanton Wilson G.Steet r
DISTRICT NO. 13: John M.Gullixson,Chair Daniel T.Welch
x Bob Zeroed,Chair pro rem Ton Daly
Burnie Dump Glenn Parker
_S_ Mark A.Murphy _ Joanne CopnR
a William G.Steiner Roper Shown
DISTRICT NO.14: 3 Thomas R.Sab.elli,Chair A.FbM
�!L Mart A.Murphy,Chair pro tom Joemg Co e:s,
Barry Hammond al Went
y William 6.Stem. Raper Stamon
Fear A.Swan Darryl Mill.
.2-
2/28/96
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Don McIntyre, General Manager, Blake P. Anderson,
Assistant General Manager-Operations, Judith A.
Wilson, Assistant General Manager-Administration,
Penny Kyle, Board Secretary, Mark Esquer, John
Finias, Janet Gray, Ed Hodges, Steve Hovey, Patricia
Jonk, Terri Josway, Steve Kozak, John Linder, David
Ludwin, Greg Mathews, Pat McNally, Bob Ooten,
Mike Peterman, Adriana Renescu, Gary Streed,
Mahin Talebi, Michelle Tuchman, Dan Tunnicliff,
Nancy Wheatley, Mike White, Paula Zeller
OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Mark
Asturias, Gary Grasser, Richard Hertel, Bill Knopf,
Howard Slavin, Phil Stone, Brad Wilkinson
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive and file resolution of the Board of
Supervisors re change in appointment of
active and alternate representatives
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That Resolution No. 96-8 from the Board of Supervisors re change in
appointment of active and alternate representatives, be, and is hereby, received
and ordered filed, as follows:
Districts Active Director Alternate Director
1, 2, 3, & 11 Roger R. Stanton William G. Steiner
5, 6, 7, 13 & 14 William G. Steiner Roger R. Stanton
-3-
2/28/96
DISTRICT 2
Receive, file, and accept resignation of Mayor
Joseph S. Barsa of the City of Villa Park and
seatina first and second alternates to the Mayor
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the letter from Mayor Joseph S. Barsa of the City of Villa Park resigning from
the Board of Directors of District No. 2, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed;
and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the following first and second alternates to the Mayor be
seated as members of the Board:
District Active Director Alternate Director
2 Barry L. Denes Bob Bell
ALL DISTRICTS
Recognition of persons who wish to
be heard on specific aaenda items
Mr. Mark Asturias, Economic Development Manager of the City of Garden Grove,
and Mr. Richard Hertel, Senior Vice President of Professional Real Estate Services
representing House Food Industrial Co., Ltd, requested that they be recognized at
the appropriate time for the agenda item considering adoption of a moratorium on
determination and collection of excess capacity charges until a study has been
completed and a method has been adopted.
ALL DISTRICTS
Presentation of Orange County Ena ein erina
Council Engineering Achievement Award
Vice Joint Chair Swan announced that at the annual meeting of the Orange County
Engineering Council held earlier in the month, the Sanitation Districts' Secondary
Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2 project was selected to receive the Engineering
Achievement Award. He then recognized David Ludwin, Director of Engineering,
who accepted the award.
-4-
2/28/96
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the Joint Chair
Vice Joint Chair Swan, acting for Joint Chair Cox who was absent, advised the
Directors that the next Strategic Planning Meeting is scheduled for Saturday, May 4
between 9:00 am and noon. This meeting will be addressing water conservation
and reclamation issues.
The following tentatively scheduled upcoming meetings were then announced as
follows:
Operations, Maintenance, and Technical Services Committee -Wednesday,
March 6, at 5:30 p.m.
Planning, Design, and Construction Committee -Thursday, March 7, at
5:30 p.m.
Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee - Wednesday,
March 13, at 5:30 p.m.
Executive Committee -Wednesday, March 20, at 5:30 p.m.
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of General Manager
The General Manager recognized the Districts' Director of Technical Services -
Nancy Wheatley, Director of Maintenance - Ed Hodges, and Director of Operations -
Bob Oaten, who reported on the sewage spill incident that occurred on February 22
in Newport Beach.
Mr. Hodges briefed the Directors on Districts' operations of 22 outlying pump
stations that pump wastewater to our facilities for treatment. On February 21 at
approximately 10:15 p.m. the Control Center Clerk received and acknowledged an
alarm that the Bay Bridge Pump Station, located on Pacific Coast Highway west of
Bayside Drive, had a low wet well level, causing the pumps to shut down. At
approximately 3:00 a.m. on February 22, a resident in the area noticed sewage
backing up in his home. He called 911 and no one responded. The City of Newport
Beach Fire Department arrived on the scene at approximately 4:30 a.m., and
immediately called the City of Newport Beach Utilities Department. City crews
arrived shortly thereafter and began interviews with the effected residents. At
approximately 6:00 a.m. on February 22 the city crews identified Sanitation Districts'
equipment as the problem, went to the Bay Bridge Pump Station, and notified the
Control Center they were going to cut the padlocks to enter the Districts' Pump
Station. Upon entering they noticed the pumps turned off, recognized how to start
-5-
2128/96
the equipment, and turned the pumps on and relieved the spill within a few minutes.
At approximately 6:38 a.m. the Districts' maintenance crews arrived at the pump
station to begin to troubleshoot the problem, as well as crews arriving on the scene
to assist with the cleanup and spill assessment. He then gave a brief slide
presentation.
Ms. Wheatley reported that upon learning of the spill she immediately informed the
Assistant General Manager of Operations, Blake Anderson, of the situation. The
Director of Communications, Michelle Tuchman, and she were assigned to go to the
scene immediately to coordinate Districts' participation in the spill. Upon arrival the
Newport Beach Fire Department had an Incident Command Center in place and
were responsible for the coordination of all activities at the scene. They estimated
that approximately 6,000 gallons had spilled into the bay, and identified a stretch of
homes the Fire Department was going door to door to check if the owner was home
or to establish a point of contact in order to get into those homes. Representatives
from print and TV media were also at the scene. Monica Mazur of the Orange
County Health Department was also there to talk to each of the residents about
health risks. Ms. Wheatley estimated that 36,000 gallons of sewage were actually
spilled in the bay, streets and homes. Ultimately, the Fire Department had a list of
16 homes affected by the spill to varying degrees. Most were confined to the
bathroom areas, causing a shower or tub to overflow onto whatever the people had
in the bathroom on the floor. Some homes had additional flooding outside the
bathroom and therefore additional damage. Two of the homes the Fire Department
identified were seriously flooded and sustained significant damage. By noon all
activity at the site had been completed and the Fire Department closed the Incident
Command Center. Ms. Wheatley concluded that the Districts owe a great debt of
thanks to the Newport Beach Fire Department and the Utility Department for being
good partners in the response.
Mr. Dolan reported that the Operations Department is responsible for 24-hours/day
monitoring of the 22 pump stations. When the alarm was received, the clerk
informed the acting shift supervisor. They both reviewed the graphics on screen and
acknowledged the alarm. A low water alarm means that the water level is below the
normal operating range and the concern is for the equipment. After checking the
graphics and the equipment was turned off, both thought their job was done and
took no further action on the alarm from 10:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. He noted a few
years ago the pump station monitoring system was computerized and the low water
alarm status was changed. The low water alarm in the manual system was viewed
as a critical alarm; in the computerized system it's viewed as a non-critical alarm,
thus no further action was taken. The acting shift supervisor questioned the clerk
whose training led her to believe this was not an important alarm. When these
alarms are received in the Control Center at off times, the pump station corrects
itself and goes back on-line, business as usual. The primary concern is about the
equipment, so no further computer inquiries were made by staff and depended on
-6-
2f28/96
the computer system to give them additional information concerning that pump
station if necessary.
Mr. Hodges concluded his presentation by saying the maintenance crews responded
at 6:38 a.m. and at 7:00 a.m. started work on the remediation of the problem. By
11:00 a.m. the bubbler tube had been repaired and the station was put back into
normal operation. A policy was immediately initiated to check all bubblers in all
pump stations, which will now be a routine part of normal maintenance. Also under
consideration is the possibility of additional alarm points that would identify the wet
well level, pump operation, and effluent flow and additional high level sensors. He
further stated that a debriefing session was held after this was over and will be
implemented into our Integrated Emergency Waste Response Plan.
Ms. Wheatley then concluded that the Director of Communications is continuing to
hear daily from homeowners with concerns. One of the major concerns is that since
sewage was in their home, they are worried about what that means to them. The
Districts have hired an industrial hygienist to help answer those questions. Another
issue is regulatory compliance with the Districts' NPDES permit. The event is
reportable to the regulatory agencies; the Regional Water Quality Control Board and
the US EPA Thereare permit implications which staff takes very seriously. Staff
from the Regional Board has been on site for several days interviewing Districts'
staff, without their supervisors being present, and have been gathering information
about what occurred. They've reviewed our letter of reported spill and our
calculations, and we expect they will talk with us when their investigation is
completed.
General Counsel then reported on the legal issues concerning Districts' liability and
claims for the homes damaged that would be forthcoming. The General Manager
has directed to resolve the claims with those people as quickly as possible. There
are three basic positions: (1) tell the claimants to send their bills, no matter what they
are, and we'll pay for them; (2) don't pay any of the bills, figure out who is at fault,
and make everybody carry the load; and (3) somewhere in between. Most of the
damages are minimal, probably between $500.00 to $5,000.00. The current claims
Settlement Resolution has authority for a committee of the General Manager,
Finance Director and General Counsel to settle any claims up to $50,000.00, so
there is authority to resolve these quickly, and the General Manager's
recommendation is to pay the small claims without regard for determining full
responsibility at this time, in furtherance of goodwill and good public policy. The
Districts must protect their position on the larger claims for remote possibilities of
false or inflated claims. Additionally, the Districts must be in a position to contest
any claim or to place responsibility equitably upon other parties who may be at fault.
Some of the larger claims are for homes that are in a condominium complex built low
with an on-site, privately owned and operated pump station that has to lift the waste
out of these places high enough to get into the City of Newport Beach's sewer line
-7-
2/28/96
that connects to our pump station. Each home was also required by the City of
Newport Beach to have an anti-backflow device to prevent sewage backing into the
houses. This is being investigated and the Districts' position will be protected so that
unsubstantiated sums are not paid.
The General Manager then recognized Mahin Talebi, Source Control Manager, and
Adriana Renescu, Senior Engineer, to provide the Directors with their US EPA
national award-winning presentation on "How to be Business Friendly".
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of General Counsel
The General Counsel referred the Directors to the Annual Litigation Status Report
that was included in their agenda packages. He also briefly reported on a
memorandum included in their meeting folders that evening regarding 29 lawsuits
along the Santa Ana River whereby the Districts were successful in getting all legal
expenses incurred due to the lawsuits reimbursed.
Mr. Woodruff further reported that recently he met with Assemblyman Curt Pringle's
staff regarding AB2109, which is a comprehensive bill being proposed to dissolve all
existing water and sewer agencies in Orange County and to form a new agency
entitled Orange County Water and Sanitation District, with ten directly-elected
Directors, two from each of the five geographical boundaries of the supervisorial
districts. The meeting was intended to provide information relative to the Districts,
such as how they're organized and operated, and to review the plans that are under
study for the consolidation of the nine districts. Assemblyman Pringle's primary
focus is on the application before LAFCO involving the City of Garden Grove and the
Garden Grove Sanitary District, which has been pending for 25 months. The second
area of focus is the public agencies who have significant excess reserve funds,
especially if they have invested in such things as real estate. The third area of focus
is the consolidation of the small water and sanitary districts of South County. The
speaker's bill is limited to Orange County. General Counsel stated he would keep
the Directors apprised of the situation as it further develops.
DISTRICT 1
Approval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting
held January 24, 1996, and the adjourned meetings held January 27 and February
14, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
-8-
2/28/96
DISTRICT 2
Aooroval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting
held January 24, 1996, and the adjourned meetings held January 27 and February
14, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 3
Aproval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting
held January 24, 1996, and the adjourned meetings held January 27 and February
14, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 5
Aooroval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting
held January 24, 1996, and the adjourned meetings held January 27 and February
14, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 6
Aooroval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting
held January 24, 1996, and the adjourned meetings held January 27 and February
14, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 7
Aooroval of Minutes - -
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting
held January 24, 1996, and the adjourned meetings held January 27 and February
14, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
-9-
2/28/96
DISTRICT 11
Approval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting
held January 24, 1996, and the adjourned meeting held February 14, 1996, the
Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 13
Approval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting
held January 24, 1996, the adjourned meetings held January 27 and February 14,
1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 14
Approval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting
held January 24, 1996, the adjourned meetings held January 27 and February 14,
1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
ALL DISTRICTS
Ratification of payment of Joint and
Individual District Claims
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That payment of Joint and Individual District claims set forth on exhibits"A" , 'B",
and "C", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below,
be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated.
-10-
2128/96
ALL DISTRICTS 01/24/96 01/30/96 20 /07/96
Joint Operating Fund - $ 330,891.89 $ 1,984.69 $1.097,537.60
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 716,314.33 100.00 377,866.63
Joint Working Capital Fund - 508,946.57 183,218.02
Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 3,511.49 8,582.81 63,272.44
DISTRICT NO. 1 - 92.60 443.50
DISTRICT NO. 2 - 1.305.61 5.033.49
DISTRICT NO. 3 - 500,455.26 423,815.28
DISTRICT NO. 5 - 477.07 12,802.61
DISTRICT NO. 6 - 69.20 252.84
DISTRICT NO. 7 - 312,689.59 62,188.89
DISTRICT NO. 11 - 10,463.03 195,154.05
DISTRICT NO. 13 - 3.40 0.00
DISTRICT NO. 14 - 764.81 17.05
DISTRICTS NOS. 3 & 11 JOINT - 875.00 0.00
DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 678.04 172,537.30
DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 213.30 2,258.68
DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 15.98 6,341.96
$2.387.767.17 1 5 $2.602.740.34
ALL DISTRICTS
Aooroving Amendment No. 1 to the
Professional Services Aareement for
Surveving Services for Various Collection
System and Treatment Plant Proiects.
Specification No. P-150, with Clifford A.
Forkert Civil Engineers
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 96-18, approving
Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Clifford A. Forkert Civil
Engineers for Surveying Services for Various Collection System and Treatment Plant
Projects, Specification No. P-150, providing for a name change to Forkert Engineering
& Surveying, Inc. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these
minutes.
-11-
2128/96
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive and file draft minutes of the
Steering Committee
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the draft minutes of the Steering Committee meeting held on January 24, 1996,
be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed.
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive and file draft minutes of the Planning
Design. and Construction Committee
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the draft minutes of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee meeting
held on February 1, 1996, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed.
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive and file draft minutes of the Operations.
Maintenance. and Technical Services Committee
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the draft minutes of the Operations, Maintenance, and Technical Services
Committee meeting held on February 7, 1996, be, and are hereby, received and
ordered filed.
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive and file draft minutes of the Finance. Administration.
and Human Resources Committee
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the draft minutes of the Finance, Administration, and Human Resources
Committee meeting held on February 14, 1996, be, and are hereby, received and
ordered filed.
-12-
2/28/96
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive and file draft minutes of the Executive Committee
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the draft minutes of the Executive Committee meeting held on February 21,
1996, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed.
ALL DISTRICTS
Verbal reoort from Chair of Planning. Design.
and Construction Committee re February 1. 1996
meetin
Verbal report
Director John Collins, Chair of the Planning, Design and Construction
Committee, gave a brief verbal report and recommending approval on the two
items of consideration.
ALL DISTRICTS (PDC95-34)
Actions re Maintenance Buildina at Plant No. 2,
Job No. P2-35-3: Process Area Fire Protection.
Sionape and Water Distribution System Modifications
at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-38-5, Process Area Fire
Protection. Sianaae and Water Distribution System
Modifications at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-46: and
Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications
At Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-55
Approving Addendum No. 1 to the
plans and specifications
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for said project, changing
the date for receipt of bids from January 9, 1996 to January 16, 1996, clarifying
contractor's license requirements, and making miscellaneous technical
clarifications, be, and is hereby, approved.
-13-
2/28/96
Approving Addendum No. 2 to the
Plans and specifications
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications for said project, making
miscellaneous technical clarifications, be, and is hereby, approved.
Awarding contract to Sverdrup Civil, Inc.
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 96-19, receiving and
filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Maintenance
Building at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-35-3; Process Area Fire Protection, Signage
and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-5;
Process Area Fire Protection, Signage and Water Distribution System
Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-46; and, Chemical and Plant Water
Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-55, to Sverdrup Civil, Inc., in the
total corrected amount of$13,196,500.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto,
is hereby made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS
Verbal report from Chair of Operations.
Maintenance. and Technical Services
Committee re February 7. 1996 meeting
Verbal report
Director Pat McGuigan, Chair of the Operations, Maintenance, and Technical
Services Committee gave a brief report on the items being recommended for
approval.
-14-
2128/96
ALL DISTRICTS (OMTS95-041A & B)
Actions re Heavy Duty Vehicle Demonstration
Project with South Coast Air Quality Management
District (SCAQMD)
Authorizing the General Manaaerto enter
into an aareement with SCAQMD
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to enter into an
agreement with SCAQMD re said project, at no cost to the Districts, in form
approved by General Counsel.
Authorizina the General Manager to enter
into a Memorandum of Understandina with
SCAQMD
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to enter into a
Memorandum of Understanding with SCAQMD re said project, in form approved
by General Counsel.
ALL DISTRICTS
Verbal report from Chair of Finance,
Administration, and Human Resources
Committee re February 14, 1996 meeting
Verbal report
Director George Brown, Chair of the Finance, Administration, and Human
Resources Committee requested that Vice Joint Chair Peer A. Swan give a brief
report on the items being recommended for approval in his absence.
-15-
2/28/96
ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR96-04)
Refer item re Extending Benefit Coveraoe for regular
employees who work a reduced work week to the
Finance. Administration. and Human Resources
Committee for further analysis
Verbal report
Mike Peterman, Acting Director of Human Resources, briefly summarized staffs
recommendation in approving the extension of benefit coverage for those
employees working a reduced work week. Following discussion among the
Directors, it was then moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby refer the item back to the Finance,
Administration, and Human Resources Committee, and to return said item to the
Boards to include more detailed financial analysis and information on overtime
expenses and how the use of part-time employees would mitigate this. General
Counsel was requested to look at the issue of management discretion,
extending this benefit on a case-by-case basis and determine if there are any
legal impediments to this.
Director William G. Steiner requested that his opposition to the motion be made
a matter of record.
ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR96-10)
Approving Renewal of Boiler& Machinery
Insurance with American Manufacturers
Mutual Insurance (Kemper Insurance Group)
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the renewal of Boiler& Machinery Insurance for a one-year period effective
March 1, 1996 to March 1, 1997, with American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance
(Kemper Insurance Group), in an amount not to exceed $79,698.00, be, and is
hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR96-14)
Receive and file Treasurer's Report
for the month of December 1995
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Treasurer's Report for the month of December 1995, be, and is hereby,
received and ordered filed.
-16-
2/28/96
ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR96-15)
Receive and file Mid-Year Financial and
Operations Report dated December 31, 1995
After a brief presentation by Mike White, Controller, on the Mid YearFinancial and
Operations Report, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Mid-Year Financial and Operations Report dated December 31, 1995, be,
and is hereby, received and ordered filed.
ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR96-171
Approve 1996-97 Budget Assumptions for
use of Districts' 1996-97 Budget
After a brief presentation by Mike White, Controller, on the budget assumptions used
for preparing the 1996-97 budget, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the 1996-97 Budget Assumptions, for use in preparation of Districts'
1996-97 Budget, be, and are hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS
Verbal report from Chair of Executive
Committee re February 21, 1996 meeting
In the absence of Joint Chair Cox, Vice Joint Chair Peer Swan gave a verbal report on
the Joint Agreement of the County of Orange, the Official Investment Pool
Participants' Committee, and Each Option A Pool recommended for approval by the
Executive Committee. He stated that this item passed in the Executive Committee
meeting by a 712 vote of approval.
ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR96-09)
Receive and file staff report dated
February 5. 1996, and approving the Joint
Agreement of the County of Orange. the Official
Investment Pool Participants' Committee,
and each Option A Pool
Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager of Operations, gave a brief report on the
status of the Orange County Commingled Investment Pool Committee and the County
of Orange bankruptcy. Directors then entered into a lengthy discussion.
-17-
2/28/96
It was then moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the staff report dated February 5, 1996 re the Joint Agreement of the County of
Orange, the Official Investment Pool Participants' Committee, and Each Option A
Pool, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 96-21,
approving said agreement. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a
part of these minutes.
Directors Don R. Griffin, John M. Gullixson, Margie L. Rice, and Daniel T. Welch
requested that their opposition to the motion be made a matter of record.
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive and file Staff Report dated
February 22, 1996, re moratorium on
the determination and collection of
excess capacity charges
Nancy Wheatley, Director of Technical Services, briefly summarized excess capacity
charges. Staff has been looking at connection charges trying to develop a fair system
for all Districts' customers, both residential and business. There have been different
ways in how various kinds of business, industrial, and commercial customers have
been treated in the past which is, in fact, what led staff to develop the excess capacity
charges recommended to the Directors last spring. Existing businesses were not
charged an additional capital connection fee regardless of how much they increased
their flow, whereas if a new business came on line with more than 50,000 gallons,
they would be charged the connection fee. It was concluded that the best thing to do
at this point was to place a moratorium on these types of fees pending the completion
of the strategic plan in the capital connection study.
Staff is recommending that there be no excess capacity charges assessed until that
study is completed. At that time, a new system should be in place and applied to all
businesses. Any new business which comes on line between now and the time that
the revised fee system is adopted would be told that there would be a charge in an
amount established in the future, the payment of which will be deferred until that time.
It will not be a retroactive charge, but they will have to pay the fee at that time. It is
anticipated that the charge will be an annual charge and will be assessed based upon
flow. It is recommended that new businesses moving to Orange County need to know
what the magnitude of that charge would be. Staff has proposed that the Districts
guarantee those businesses that on an annual basis their total charge would be no
higher than the one-time charge which would be assessed under the present system
based on the excess capacity charge calculation. Staff also recommends using the
-18-
2/28/96
excess capacity charge calculation because staff believes that it fairly reflects the
Districts' costs of providing capital facilities for businesses to handle flow and solids.
The Vice Joint Chair then recognized Mark Asturias, Economic Development
Manager, representing the Mayor and Council from the City of Garden Grove. He
stated that the City is supportive of everything the Districts are doing in regards to the
excess capacity charge, and applauds and supports Districts' current efforts and
recommendation being considered at this meeting. However, the City was requesting
further relief on the method of calculation of the excess capacity charge. He stated
that the City believes that with the previous policy, capacity charge calculation was
substantially lower than what is currently being proposed. Using House Foods as an
example, he stated that this business would have been charged under the old method
somewhere in the area of$660,000. Under the currently proposed method, House
Foods would be charged in excess of$1,400,000. He asked the Boards to consider
placing a cap on the adoption of staffs recommendation. The City is trying to assist
House Foods who is trying to move into their community. In response to Directors'
questions, he stated that House Foods was not moving into a redevelopment project
area and cannot assist them with reduction of any city fees. They are working with
them, however, to expedite permitting and providing offsets to some city fees.
Vice Joint Chair Swan then recognized Richard Hertel, consultant for House Foods,
which is a Japanese tofu manufacturer. He stated House Foods was moving from Los
Angeles to Garden Grove where they purchased land about three years prior. House
Foods wanted to go on record to ask the Board of Directors in their case specifically to
waive any excess capacity fees for their particular use. He then stated the reasons as
follows: (1) House Foods has been a corporate citizen in Garden Grove for three
years, (2) prior to buying the property they hired John Brown, a renowned consulting
firm, that did a lot of the due diligence for House Foods, part of which was meeting
with the different governmental authorities, including the Sanitation Districts. They
were advised by their consultant that there were certain fees involving connections,
none of which were excess capacity fees. He stated that he had notes that state how
the Districts determined the fee of approximately $67,000.00, based on a square
footage and building size. He further stated the current ordinance does not stipulate
an absolute excess capacity fee or any formula to calculate such a fee, but it does
provide that on a case by case basis, some fee may be charged.
The District is discussing a fee for House Foods based on their projected actual
usage. House Foods will discharge about 95,000 gallons per day of effluent. Based
on that, an equivalent dwelling unit method of calculation has been determined by staff
requiring House Foods to pay a fee of about $660,000. Mr. Hertel further stated the
Sanitation Districts started the case by case program in about 1983, and since that
time it hasn't consistently implemented any kind of an excess capacity fee. In fad, out
of the 80 or 85 companies in Orange County that have flow in excess of 50,000
gallons, he was not aware of any private companies that had to pay an excess
_19_
2/26196
capacity fee. House Foods perspective is that they would certainly agree to the same
formula that Kimberly Clark, for example, who uses 2,000,000 gallons a day, would
pay.
House Foods' position is the Districts should allow companies to obtain sewer permits
during this study period without payment of any excess capacity charge. Until such
time as a new ordinance is adopted, the Districts should process all sewer
applications as they have in the past, fairly and without excessive user fees. He
further stated that House Foods understands the need for the Districts to upgrade
their system and have the people and the heavy users in Orange County pay their fair
share, House Foods has no problem paying the standard fees that all other
companies in Orange County have paid over the years. Therefore House Foods
would request that the Board waive excess capacity charge.
Following discussion among the Directors and questions to staff, It was moved,
seconded, and duly carried:
That the Staff Report dated February 22, 1996, requesting staff be authorized to place
a moratorium on the determination of amount and collection of excess capacity
charges until such time that a study of capital charges is completed and a method to
asses and collect capital charges is adopted by the Boards of Directors, and to
guarantee the capital charge for industrial users, which connect to the system or
increase their discharge prior to completion of the study, will be no higher than those
specified in said Staff Report, be, and is hereby, received, and ordered filed and
adopted. Said moratorium will not apply to dischargers which enter into separate
discharge agreements with the Districts.
ALL DISTRICTS
General Counsel's comments Prior to Closed Session
General Counsel reported to the Directors the need for a closed session as authorized
by Government Code Section 54956.9(a) to discuss and consider the items that are
specified as Item 15(b)(1) and (2) on the published Agenda.
ALL DISTRICTS
Convene in Closed Session pursuant to
Government Code Section 54956.9(a)
The Boards convened in closed session at 10:14 p.m. pursuant to Government Code
Section 54956.9(a). Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Boards of
Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code
Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of
Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. No actions were
taken re Agenda Items 15(b)(1) and (2).
-20-
2/28196
ALL DISTRICTS
Reconvene in regular session
At 10:35 p.m., the Boards reconvened in regular session.
DISTRICT 1
Adiournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be
adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:35 p.m.
DISTRICT 2
Aooroving Agreement with the Orange
County Flood Control District re installation
of flood Protection on South River Trunk
as Part of the Santa Ana River Flood
Improvements
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 96-22-2, approving
Agreement with the Orange County Flood Control District, providing for
reimbursement of costs to the Flood Control District re installation of flood protection
on South River Trunk as part of the Santa Ana River Flood Improvements, in an
amount not to exceed $50,000.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby
made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 2
Journment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be
adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:35 p.m.
DISTRICT 3
Journment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be
adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:35 p.m.
-21-
2/28/96
DISTRICT 5
Receive and file Summons and Comolaint
for Inverse Condemnation. Charles G.
Reynold. at al.. vs. City of Newport Beach,
at al.. Superior Court Case No. 758245
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Summons & Complaint for Inverse Condemnation, Charles G. Reynolds, at
al., vs. City of Newport Beach, at al., Superior Court Case No. 758245, for alleged
damages to homes due to surface runoff because of a ruptured sewer line adjacent to
plaintiffs' homes, be, and is hereby, received and ordered file, and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the District's General Counsel be, and is hereby, authorized
to appear and defend the interests of the District.
DISTRICT 5
Joumment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be
adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:35 p.m.
DISTRICT 6
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be
adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:35 p.m.
DISTRICT 7
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be
adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:35 p.m.
-22-
2/28/96
DISTRICT 11
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be
adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:35 p.m.
DISTRICT 13
Journment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be
adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:35 p.m.
DISTRICT 14
Adiournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be
adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:35 p.m.
Secretary he Bards of Directors
Of County VnitatillnDistricts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, e7, 11, 13 & 14
-23-
FUND NO 9169 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0122196 PAGE 1 -
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 0124196 POSTING DATE 0124196
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
149482 A-1 FENCE CO INC. $797.00 GATE REPAIR
149483 AG TECH COMPANY $50.243.52 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91
149484 ASL CONSULTING ENGINEERS $1,028.74 ATWOOD SUBTRUNK PLAN PREPARATION
149485 ASRANALYSIS $1,500.00 LAB SERVICES
149486 ATM AA,INC. $1,160.00 LAB SERVICES
149487 ATB T-MEGACOM SERVICE $5,453.90 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
149488 AT&T-MEGACOM SERVICE $2,003.40 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
149489 AT&T-CELLULAR CR&R $6.10 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
149490 ACORN CONSULTING $2,730.00 CONSULTING SERVICES
149491 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS,INC. $2.553.00 CONSTRUCTION P1-36-1
149492 AIR UQUIDE AMERICA CORP. $1.247.69 SPECIALTY GASSES
149493 AIR PRODUCTS F,CHEMICALS $18.322.00 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.O.8-9.89
149494 ALADDIN HOUSE $350.45 WINDOWBUNDS
149495 AMERIDATA $1.280.82 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
149496 AMERICAN AIR FILTER,INC. $1,82836 MECHANICAL PARTS
149497 AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION $85.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
149496 AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE $317.81 CHEMICALS
149499 APA EDUCATION TRUST $2,055.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING
X 149500 APCO VALVE&PRIMER CORP. $1.912.56 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
y 149501 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $3.420.60 NOTICES&ADS
M 149502 APPLE ONE $5,962.00 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
m 149503 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $8,714.05 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
M
y 149500 AQUATIC BIOASSAY BCONSULTANTS 95,475.00 LABORATORY SERVICES
149505 ARROWHEAD ELECTRIC CORP. $416.21 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
149506 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE,INC. $931.20 TOXIC WASTE REMOVAL
149507 AMSA $425.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
149505 AURORA PUMP $37.00 PUMP PARTS
149509 RANDOLPH AUSTIN CO. $576.10 LAB SUPPLIES
149510 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $3.884.66 PAYROLL SERVICES
149511 BFI MEDICAL WASTE SYSTEMS $46.05 WASTE DISPOSAL
140512 E S BABCOCK&SONS INC $1,140.00 LAB ANALYSIS
140513 BAKER INSTRUMENT CO $25.019.95 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
149514 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $608.57 BATTERIES
149515 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $2,892.37 LAB SUPPLIES
119516 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $154.30 TRUCK WASH TICKETS
149517 SIOSOUDS RECYCLERS OF SO CAL i1,000.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES
149518 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $18.143.47 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-1-2
149519 BRENNER-FIEDLER&ASSOC..INC. $101.84 GENERATORS
149520 BUSH&ASSOCIATES,INC. $4,652.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O."-94
149521 CCI TECHNOLOGIES $527.00 SPLICE CABLES
149522 C.C.S.C.E. $210.11 PUBLICATION
149523 CEM CORPORATION $7.300.40 LAB SUPPLIES
149524 CH2M HILL $10,606.20 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-31
149525 CALFON CONSTRUCTION $306,091.56 CONSTRUCTION 7-22&7-24
149526 CALTROL,INC. $1,231.05 HARDWARE
149527 CALIF ASSOC.OF SAN.AGENCIES $120.00 WORK CONFERENCE REGISTRATION
FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 01122198 PAGE2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID O124196 POSTING DATE 0124/96
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
149528 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $85.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
149529 CALTEX PLASTICS,INC. $1,084.72 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
149530 CAMALI CORP. $3.625.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
149531 CAPITALWESTWARD $223.71 MECHANICAL PARTS
149532 JOHN CARDLLO ENGINEERS $17,762.25 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-15.2
149633 JOHN CARDILLO ENGINEERS $1,337A4 ENGINEERING SERVICES MO B-23.95
149534 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $699.18 OFFICE FURNITURE
149535 MICHAEL A CHAMP $6,50000 OCEAN MONITORING
149536 CHROME CRANKSHAFT,INC. $720.00 PUMP PARTS
149537 CLEMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL $12.572.67 CONSULTANT-LANDFILL PROJECT MO 7-31-95
149538 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $11,191.23 ELECTRIC PARTS
149539 CONSUMER PIPE $1.267.02 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
149540 CONTINENTAL EQUIP E SUPPLY $16.52 TOOLS
149541 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $715.46 ENGINE PARTS
149542 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $346.10 TRUCK PARTS
149543 COVEY LEADERSHIP CENTER $558.00 SUBSCRIPTION
149544 CHARLES P.CROWLEY.CO. $369.24 INSTRUMENT PARTS
[4 149545 CITY OF CYPRESS $25.00 BUDGET COPY
54 149546 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION $311.50 UNDERGROUND FUELJOIL STORAGE TAX
S 149547 SWRCB/AFRS $400.00 WASTE DISCHARGE FEE
r
tD 149548 DATA SYSTEMS SERVICE $278.58 SOFTWARE
�--� 149549 ALBERT W DAVIES INC $474,027.36 CONSTRUCTION 3-36R
H 149550 DEL MAR ANALYTICAL $2,208.00 LAB SUPPLIES
T 149551 THE DIAMOND GROUP $4.000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ro 149552 LABCLEAR $100.52 LAB SUPPLIES
149553 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $392.51 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
149554 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $942.52 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE
149555 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $265.50 PAINT SUPPLIES
149556 EDWARDS DIV.OF GS BLDG SYS. $2,641.50 SERVICE AGREEMENT
149557 LINDA EISMAN $636.66 TRAINING SUPPLIES
149558 - EMERGENCY MGMT NETWORK $1.380.00 CPMRST AID TRAINING
149559 ENCHANTER,INC. $2,800.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5.24-95
149560 FLUID TECH.SALES $614.71 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
149561 FST SAND AND GRAVEL,INC. $1,282.26 ROAD BASE MATERIALS
149562 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $16.318.36 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O. 10-9-91
149563 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $138.50 AIR FREIGHT
149564 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $416.64 FILTERS
149565 FIRST CHOICE $1,164.32 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT
149566 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $429.60 LAB SUPPLIES
149567 FISONS INSTRUMENTS $2.161.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
149568 FLICKINGER CO $233.99 VALVE
149569 FLO-SYSTEMS $10.575.08 PUMP PARTS
149570 FLUID METERING INC $2.051.17 LAB SUPPLIES
149571 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT 3895.80 PAINT SUPPLIES
149572 GMF SOUND INC $975.62 COMMUNICATIONS SUPPLIES
149573 GST,INC. $1,987.64 OFFICE SUPPLIES
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0122196 PAGE 3
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 0124196 POSTING DATE 01/24/96
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
149574 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $2.994.37 ELECTRIC PARTS
149575 GENERAL PETROLEUM $16,953.22 DIESEL I UNLEADED FUEL
149576 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $6,586.97 TELEPHONE SERVICES
149577 TOM GERLINGER $1.723.44 REIMB.TRAINING B TRAVEL
149578 GOVT CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENT $175.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
149579 GOVERNMENT INSTITUTES INC $1.655.00 PUBLICATIONS
149580 GRASSY S.T.I. S6D4.50 ENGINE PARTS
149581 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 6402A3 FIBER OPTIC SUPPLIES
149582 OGA CONSULTANTS $6.933.93 SURVEYING SERVICES MO 8-23-95&NO 6-8-94
149583 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $958.49 TRUCK PARTS
149584 HARBOUR ENGINEERING $15,571.00 MECHANICAL PARTS
149585 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS $730.00 CONTAINER RENTALS
149586 HAWKINS ASSOCIATES $450.00 LAB EQUIPMENT
149557 HOLMES S NARVER,INC. $9.125.30 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1d4&P2-53 MO 3.8-95
149583 HOME DEPOT $132.26 SMALL HARDWARE
149589 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $988.89 PAINT SUPPLIES
149590 WIS PRESS $65.00 PUBLICATION
149591 1 C M A DISTRIBUTION CTR $232.40 PUBLICATIONS
x 149592 IPCO SAFETY $3,097.45 SAFETY SUPPLIES
149593 ITT BARTON SALES $960.29 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
m 149594 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $425.31 BATTERIES
I"I 149595 CITY OF IRVINE $29,000.00 ADJUST 8 REHABILITATE 43 MANHOLES
3 149596 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $70.44 WATER USE
Y 149597 J2 PRINTING SERVICES $525.02 PRIMING
w 149598 JAMISON ENGINEERING $25,098.32 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
149599 JAYS CATERING $47.60 DIRECTORS MEETING EXPENSE
149600 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO. $64.60 GAUGE
149601 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $1.166.08 ELECTRIC PARTS
149602 JONES CHEMICALS,INC. $13,918.72 SODIUM HYPOCHLORTTE NO 26-95
149603 JONES INDUSTRIAL HARDWARE CO. $1,091.87 TOOLS
149604 KAL ARCHITECTS $1,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
142605 FRANCES L KALUZNY $1.680.00 HUMAN RESOURCES CONSULTANT
149605 KEYS PRODUCTIVITY CENTER $248.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
149607 KING BEARING,INC. $1.045.95 MACHINE SUPPLIES
149608 KIPLINGER $132.00 PUBLICATION
149609 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $6.538.02 TOOLS
149510 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $330.79 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICE
149611 LAIDLAW ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES $32.220.24 WASTE DISPOSAL
149612 LAMSON CORPORATION $213.89 COMPUTER PARTS
149513 LAWICRANDAL,INC. $1.778.75 SOIL TESTING 7-13-94
149614 LEAGUE OF CLAIF.CITIES $165.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION
149615 LEE&RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC. $23.798.69 ENGINEERING SERVICES
149616 SOCO-LYNCH CORP. $493.93 JANITORIAL SERVICES
149617 MPS $59.34 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
149518 MACOMCO $464.10 SERVICE AGREEMENT
149819 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS,INC. $6.184.68 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 01/2V96 PAGE4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMSPAID07/24/98 POSTING DATE 01/24/96
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
149620 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $612,150.00 CONSTRUCTION PI-36-2
149621 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $58,703.97 CONSTRUCTION P2-42-2
149622 MARTIN INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE $3,475.20 SECURITY CONSULTING
149623 MARVAC DOPY ELECTRONICS $438.88 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
149624 THE MCGRAW-HILL COMPANIES $134.47 PUBLICATION
149625 DORALDF. MCINTYRE $103.91 REIMBURSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE
149626 MEASUREMENT VARIABLES,INC. $1,236.98 FILTER SUPPLIES
149627 MIDWAY MFG.&MACHINING $9.298.58 MECHANICAL REPAIRS
149628 MILLTRONICS $1.787.53 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
149629 MONITOR LADS $249.98 INSTRUMENT
149630 MUSTANG UNITS CO.,INC. $3.509.00 ENGINE
149631 NASCO $271.33 LAB SUPPLIES
149632 NAT WEST MARKETS $11000.00 COP INTEREST DRAW FEES
149633 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES $875.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES
149634 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $2.215.02 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
149635 NEWARK ELECTRONICS $153.05 INSTRUMENT PARTS
149636 NICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY $20.901.82 LUBRICANTSIDIESEL FUEL
m 149637 OLSTEN STAFFING SERVICES $2.016.00 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
k 149638 THE ORANGE COUNTY FORUM $375.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING
x 149639 ORANGE VALVE B FITTING CO. $1.375.39 FITTINGS
149640 OXYGEN SERVICE $1.628.01 SPECIALTY GASES
� 149641 COUNTY OF ORANGE $2,830.50 PERMITS
H 149642 PACIFIC PARTS $2.381.62 INSTRUMENT PARTS
7 149843 PACIFIC BELL $1,702.85 TELEPHONE SERVICES
a
140" PADGETT - THOMPSON $885.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
149645 PAGENET $1,015.90 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
149646 PALLETS B ACCESSORIES CO. $1,531.13 PALLETS
149647 PARKHOUSE TIRE,INC. $1,108.88 TIRES
149648 PARTS UNLIMITED $338.96 TRUCK PARTS
149649 PEGASUS MAIL-C/O DAVID HARRIS $350.00 SOFTWARE
149650 PENN STATE UNIVERSITY 54,790.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
149651 MIKE PETERSON $105.49 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
149652 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $4,551.57 REIMB.PETTY CASH,TRAINING&TRAVEL
149653 POLYMETRICS,INC. $1,262.75 LAB SUPPLIES
149654 POLYPURE,INC. $23,199.40 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92
149655 POSTAGE BY PHONE $5,000.00 POSTAGE
149656 PUMPING SOLUTIONS INC $813.65 PUMP PARTS
149657 PUTZMEISTER,INC. $92.52 PUMP PARTS
149658 OMS INC $183.23 REPAIR
149659 QUICKSTART TECHNOLOGIES $3,750.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
149660 RB R INSTRUMENTS $561.59 ELECTRIC PARTS
149661 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO. $902.88 LAB SUPPLIES
149862 THE REGISTER $1,168.80 NOTICES B ADS
149663 REMEDYTEMP $3,190.71 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
149664 RENOLD INC. $85.10 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
149665 DON RICHARDSON WATER TRUCK $8.249.60 WATER TANK
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 01/22/96 PAGE 5
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 0124MO POSTING DATE 0124/96
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
149666 RM MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL $2,378.95 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
149667 RODNEY-HUNT CO $245.40 HEADWORKS REPAIR
149668 SKC WEST $1,284.94 SAFETY SUPPLIES
149669 SANTA FE BAG CO. $218.94 FREIGHT
149870 SANTA PE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $78.12 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
149671 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTL $46,716.64 OCEAN MONITORING MO 6.28-95
149672 R.CRAIG SCOTT&ASSOC. $2,756.87 LEGAL SERVICES-PERSONNEL ISSUES
149673 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $1,482.16 SPECIALTY GASES
149674 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $2.033.50 TOOLS
149675 SHURELUCK SALES $4,215.09 TOOLSHARDINARE
149676 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $1,588.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS
149677 SMITH-EMERY CO. $616.00 SOIL TESTING M.0.7-11-94
149678 SMITH PIPE&SUPPLY $343.37 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
149579 ROYA SOHANAKI $754.62 DAMAGE CLAIM SETTLEMENT
149680 SO COAST AIR QUALITY 11.64248 PERMIT FEES
149681 SOUTHERN CALIF ASSOC OF $75.00 PUBLICATION
149682 SO CALIF EDISON CO $1,284.55 POWER
[a 149683 SO CALIF EDISON CO $25,896.30 POWER
X 149684 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $27,157.73 NATURAL GAS
5 149685 SO.CALIF.WATER CO. $%03 WATER USE
149686 SPEX CHEMICAL&SAMPLE PREP $314.98 LAB SUPPLIES
m 149687 SUMMIT STEEL $2,530.17 METAL
"6 149688 SUPELCO,INC. $1.320.53 LAB SUPPLIES
q 149689 SUPER CHEM CORP. $608.85 CHEMICALS
149690 SURVEYORS SERVICE CO $134.79 TOOLS
tr 149691 SYNECTIC MEDICAL,INC. $1,561.00 LAB SUPPLIES
149692 T&C INDUSTRIAL CONTROLS $1.613.00 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
149693 TEKTRONIX,INC. $385.96 INSTRUMENT PARTS
149694 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $359.21 MECHANICAL PARTS
149695 THORPE INSULATION $47.53 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
149696 TONY'S LOCK&SAFE SERVICE $80.81 LOCKS&KEYS
149697 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $202.05 TRUCK PARTS
149698 TRUESDAIL LABS $3.540.00 LAB SERVICES
149699 JG TUCKER&SON,INC. $15,111.20 INSTRUMENT PARTS
149700 VWR SCIENTIFIC $3.281.08 LAB SUPPLIES
149701 VALIN CORPORATION $498.46 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
149702 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $1,392.40 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
149703 VERTEX TECHNOLOGIES.INC. $5,192.68 FIBER OPTICS
149704 WARREN GORHAM&LAMONT INC $349.21 PUBLICATION&SUBSCRIPTION
149705 WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION $1,155.98 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT COURSES
149706 WAXIE $1.955.02 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
149707 WAYNE ELECTRIC $283.83 TRUCK PARTS
1497DS WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $23,679.12 CAUSTIC SODA MO 9.23-95
149709 WEST4XTE SUPPLY CO. $367.28 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
149710 ROURKE,WOODRUFF&SPRADUN 178.983.59 LEGAL SERVICES MO 7-26.95
149711 XEROX CORP. $16,404.62 COPIER LEASES
FUND NO 9199 IT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 012V96 PAGE6
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 01/24198 POSTING DATE 01124196
WARRANT NO. VENDOR
149712 JOHNSON YOKOGAWA CORP. 5714.63 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 1=7195 $2.387,767.17
SUMMARY AMOUNT
#1 CONSTR FUND 392SO
42 OPER FUND $14.36
02 CAP FAC FUND 61,02814
02 CONSTR FUND $262.51
#3 OPER FUND $25,344.19
#3 CAP FAC FUND $474,827.36
03 CONSTR FUND $283.71
05 OPER FUND $392.27
1.1 05 CONSTR FUND 884.80
S
96 CONSTR FUND $69.20
I„1 #7OPERFUND 575.42
01 07 CAP FAC FUND 312.016.06
#7 CONSTR FUND 98.11
H #11 OPER FUND 8,740.18
0+ #11 CAP FAC FUND 1.637.14
m 011 CONSTR FUND 85.71
#13 CONSTR FUND $3.40
914 OPER FUND $30.85
014 CAP FAC FUND $714.00
014 CONSTR FUND $19.96
#3&11 OPER FUND $875.00
#5&6 OPER FUND $34.04
#5&6 CAP FAC FUND $644.00
#6&7 OPER FUND $213.30
#7&14 OPER FUND $15.98
JT OPER FUND $330.891.89
CORF $716.314.33
SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $3,511.49
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $508,946.57
$2,387,767.11
FUND NO 9199 • JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE OII301H PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 01130M POSTING DATE 01I30M
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
149714 ACWA $300.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING
149115 CALIF.DEBT ADVISORY $100.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING
149716 JAYS CATERING $1.654.69 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE
149717 R.CRAIG SCOTT 8 ASSOC, 88,552.81 LEGAL SERVICES-PERSONNEL ISSUES
570,867.50
SUMMARY AMOUNT
JT OPER FUND $1,984.69
CORF $100.00
SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $8,582A1
$10.667.50
Pl
X
S
H
b)
H
H
w
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 02/06196 PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 02107M POSTING DATE 0W71M
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
149731 AT&T- UNIPLAN SERVICE $2.494.55 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
149732 AT&T-MEGACOM SERVICE $1,404.38 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
149733 AT&T $56.53 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
149734 AT&T-CELLULAR CR&R $8.65 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
149735 A-Z LOGIC SYSTEMS $192.62 LAB SUPPLIES
149738 RP ADAMS COMPANY $1,750.43 MECHANICAL PARTS
149737 AIR LIOUIDE AMERICA CORP. $1.947.32 SPECIALTY GASSES
149738 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $10,565.43 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.O.8.969
149739 AIRBORNE EXPRESS $347.57 AIR FREIGHT
149740 AMERIDATA $1,128.61 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
149741 AMERICAN AIRLINES $824.35 TRAVEL SERVICES
149742 AMOCO ENERGY TRADING $61,394.58 NATURAL GAS NO 6-28.95
149743 ANIXTER-DISTRIBUTION 83,570.09 COMPUTER SUPPLIES
149744 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $2.332.22 NOTICES&ADS
149745 APPLE ONE $2,206.80 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
149746 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $124.63 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
149747 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT $1,346A2 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
149748 ATKIWJONES COMPUTER SERVICE $64260 SERVICE AGREEMENT
x 149749 AUTODESK INC. $5.096.52 SOFTWARE
149750 B.M.I. $325.00 ELECTRIC PARTS
149751 ES BABCOCK&SONS INC $898.50 UIBANALYSIS
w 149752 BANANA BLUEPRINT $22,449.24 PRINTINGM.O.11-07-94
H 149753 BANK OF AMERICA $220.64 BANKING CHARGES
149754 BATTERY SPECIALTIES 8984.95 BATTERIES
j7 149755 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. 81,2D4.72 LAB SUPPLIES
149756 BERENDSEN FLUID POWER $112.27 VALVE
149757 BLANCHARD TRAINING&DEV $1,063.30 TRAINING PUBLICATIONS
149758 TOM BLANDA $136.79 TRAINING EXPENSE REIMB
. 149759 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $2.842.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-18
149760 BRENNER-FIEDLER&ASSOC..INC. $6.597.67 GENERATORS
149761 BROOKS INSTRUMENT DIV. $341.25 INSTRUMENT
149762 BUDGET JANITORIAL $3.330.00 JANITORIAL SERVICES MO 1-12-94
149763 BNI BOOKS $89.92 BOOKS
149764 CCI TECHNOLOGIES 842D.00 SPLICE CABLES
149765 CEPA $899.50 LAB ANALYIS
149766 CH2M HILL $164,542.45 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-31
149767 CS COMPANY $5,762.96 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
149768 CALFON CONSTRUCTION $97,833.03 CONSTRUCTION 7-22&7-24
149769 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH INC. - $959.75 LAB SUPPLIES
149770 CALTROL,INC. $6,303.69 HARDWARE
149771 CAMALI CORP. $1.124.88 SERVICE AGREEMENT
149772 CANUS CORPORATION $8.285.62 FIBER OPTIC CABLE
149773 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $32.317.74 ENGINEERING SERVICES MO 5.24-95
149774 RICHARD CASTILLON $135.96 TRAINING EXPENSE REIMB
149775 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $1.758.15 OFFICE FURNITURE
149776 CHEMWEST INC $1,335.02 PUMP PARTS
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0V06M PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 02/07M POSTING DATE 02N7196
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
149777 CHROME CRANKSHAFT,INC. $240.00 PUMP PARTS
149778 CLEMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL $20.086.10 CONSULTANT-LANDFILL PROJECT MO 7-31-95
149779 COASTAL VIDEO COMMUNICATION $13,501.43 TRAINING VIDEOS
149780 COUCH&SONS $30,643.20 CONSTRUCTION M-044
149701 COUCH&SONS $190.334.00 CONSTRUCTION 11-17-1
149762 COMMUNICATIONS PERFORMANCE GROUP $17,850.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
149783 COMPUSA,INC. $64.97 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
149784 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $7.659.20 ELECTRIC PARTS
149785 CONSUMER PIPE $2,071.20 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
149786 CONTINENTAL EQUIPMENT&SUPPLY E2,213.04 TOOLS
149787 CONTINENTAL LAB PRODUCTS,INC. $60.54 LAB SUPPLIES
149788 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $17,897.03 ENGINE PARTS
149789 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $2,464.74 ELECTRIC PARTS
149790 CHARLES P.CROWLEY.CO. $648.25 INSTRUMENT PARTS
149791 ALBERT W.DAVIES,INC. $320,454.65 CONSTRUCTION 3-36R
149792 DOUGLAS J DAVIS&ASSOC.,INC. $3.949.90 INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE SERVICES
149793 DELL COMPUTER CORP. E752.10 COMPUTER PARTS
149794 DEL MAR ANALYTICAL E190.00 BIOSOLJDS ANALYSIS
M 149795 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIF. EBO,BB9.11 DENTAL INSURANCE PLAN M.O.1-12-94
X 149796 DELTA FOAM PRODUCTS $145.00 _ LAB SUPPLIES
149797 THE DIAMOND GROUP $4.000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
In 149798 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $31,912.81 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
H
149799 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $90.51 PAINT SUPPLIES
� 149800 DYALS SALES E578.19 FITTINGS
149801 DYCORP $241.79 TRUCK PARTS
N 149802 ESP NORTH $685.46 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
149803 EDWARDS HIGH VACUUM INTER. $290.57 LAB SUPPLIES
149804 FMC CORPORATION $75,299.11 HYDROGEN PEROXIDE MO 9.14.94
149805 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $111.65 AIR FREIGHT
149B06 FILTERLINE CORP. $37.00 FILTERS
149807 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $4.839.53 FILTERS
149508 FIRST CHOICE $391.64 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT
149809 FISCHER&PORTER CO. $2,774.76 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES
149810 FISHER ROSEMOUNT $1,736.98 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
149811 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $13,691.44 WATER USE
149812 FRYS ELECTRONICS $723.39 ELECTRONIC&COMPUTER SUPPLIES
149813 GST,INC. $11,443.85 COMPUTER SUPPLIES
149814 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $2,543.98 CHEMICALS
149815 GATES FIBERGLASS INSTALLERS $3,204.62 FIBERGLASS WHEEL
149816 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $4.066.49 ELECTRIC PARTS
149817 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1,078.10 TELEPHONE SERVICES
149818 GERHARDTS,INC. $4.200.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
149819 GIERLICH-MITCHELL,INC. $25,486.56 PUMP PARTS
149820 WN GRAINGER,INC. E122.64 COMPRESSOR PARTS
149521 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $2.095.90 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
149822 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC WHOLESALE $3,238.29 FIBER OPTIC SUPPLIES
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 02 NMB PAGE 3
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 021O7196 POSTING DATE 02/07/96
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
149823 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $600,52 PRINTING
149824 DGA CONSULTANTS 73,020.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6—&94
149825 HR DIRECT $13.99 OFFICE SUPPLIES
149826 HIS TYPE B GRAPHICS $346.90 PRINTING
149827 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $3,199.88 TRUCK PARTS
149828 HACH COMPANY $3,810.36 LAB SUPPLIES
149829 GEORGE T.HALL CO. $456.18 ELECTRIC PARTS
149830 HATCH 8 KIRK,INC. $3,024.91 TRUCK PARTS
149831 PL HAWN CO,INC. $321.23 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
149832 HELLO DIRECT $198.76 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
149833 HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT $2.083.33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN.
149834 HERTZ EQUIPMENT RENTAL $502.95 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
149635 HOERBIGER CVS CALIF.,INC. $2,972.57 COMPRESSOR PARTS
149836 HOME DEPOT $756.92 SMALL HARDWARE
149837 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $653.38 PAINT SUPPLIES
149836 1 C M A DISTRIBUTION CENTER $141.65 PUBLICATION
149839 IPCO SAFETY $4,121.94 SAFETY SUPPLIES
149840 ISI INFORTEXT $3,692.75 SOFTWARE
x 149841 ITT BARTON SALES $192.12 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES x 149842 IMAGING PLUS $523.81 OFFICE SUPPLIES
H 749843 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS E35.56 CONNECTORS
H 149844 INORGANIC VENTURES $227.72 LAB SUPPLIES
H 149845 INSIDE EPA $1,335.00 SUBSCRIPTIONS
n 149846 INSTRUMENT LABORATORY $373.69 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
1 149847 IRVINE PHOTO GRAPHICS $21.29 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
av 149848 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $5.54 WATER USE
149849 IRVINE SCI-TECH BOOKS 5430.00 PUBLICATIONS
149850 J2 PRINTING SERVICES $2,533.79 PRINTING
149851 JAMISON ENGINEERING $12,010.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
149852 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $1,711.37 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
149853 DEE JASPAR B ASSOC. $5,086.32 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
149854 JAYS CATERING $1,418.39 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE
149855 JOHNSON CONTROLS,INC. $203.60 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
149856 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $149.20 ELECTRIC PARTS
149857 JOHNSTON PUMP CO $2,183.02 ELECTRIC PARTS
149858 JONES CHEMICALS,INC. $7,457.31 SODIUM HYPOCKLORITE MO 446-95
149859 FRANCES L.KALUZNY $1.280.00 HUMAN RESOURCES CONSULTANT
149860 KELLY PAPER $937.40 PRINTING
149861 KEMIRON PACIFIC,INC. $149,592.10 FERRIC CHLORIDE MO 9-27-95
149862 KERRY CONSULTING GROUP $3,906.18 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MO I1-15.95
149863 KEYE PRODUCTIVITY CENTER $139.00 REGISTRATION
149864 KING BEARING,INC. $1.408.90 MACHINE SUPPLIES
149865 KLEINFELDER $432.00 GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTING SERVICES
149866 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $6,596.92 TOOLS
149867 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $613.57 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICE
149868 LAIDLAW ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES $5.444.04 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DISPOSAL
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 02/06196 PAGE4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 02/07/96 POSTING DATE 02107M
WARRANTNO. VENDOR AMOUNT
149869 LAN-AIR SUPPLY CO.,INC. $114.53 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
149870 LASERALL CORP. $582.00 PRINTER REPAIR
149871 LAW/CRANDAL,INC. $660.00 SOIL TESTING 7-13-94
149872 LEE&RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC. $9,906,50 ENGINEERING SERVICES
149873 LIEBERT CORPORATION $2,291.38 ELECTRIC PARTS
149874 K.P.LINDSTROM,INC. $3,481,14 ENVIR.CONSULTING SERVICES MO 12.9-90
149875 LUSTRE-CAL $545.95 SAFETY
149876 MDT BIOLOGIC COMPANY $936.00 LAB SUPPLIES
149877 MPS $414.84 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
149878 MACOMCO $596.75 SERVICE AGREEMENT
149879 MAGNETEK $38,213.59 GENERATOR MAINTENANCE
149860 MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY CORP. $1,652.48 TOOLS
149881 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $22.20 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
149882 MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. $551.63 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
149BB3 MIDWAY MFG.&MACHINING $3,029.58 MECHANICAL REPAIRS
149884 MISSION INDUSTRIES $5,70089 UNIFORM RENTALS
149885 MONITOR LABS $874.44 INSTRUMENT
C9 149886 MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE $5,000.00 RATING SERVICE MAINTENANCE FEES
x 149887 MOORE PRODUCTS CO $179.39 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
w 149888 MORTON SALT $673.70 SALT
1"1 149989 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES $5,357.50 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES
149890 G ROBERT NEASE PHOTOGRAPHY $1,677.67 PROFESSIONAL PHOTOGRAPHER
'3 149891 NEW HORIZONS COMPUTER CENTERS,INC. $780.00 SOFTWARE TRAINING CLASSES
n 149892 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $6.00 WATER USE
1 149893 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $5.929.94 OFFICE SUPPLIES
a 149894 OLSTEN STAFFING SERVICES $1.708.00 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
149895 ORANGE COURIER $138AS COURIER SERVICES
149596 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. $107.91 FITTINGS
149897 OXYGEN SERVICE $3,486.73 SPECIALTY GASES
149898 ORANGE CO EMPLOYEES $4.799.25 EARLY RETIREMENT PROGRAM REIMB
149899 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT $27,750.20 GAP WATER USE M.0.6-9-93
149900 PACIFIC CLIPPINGS $188.80 CONTRACTSERVICE
149901 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $1,116.06 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
149902 PACIFIC PARTS $9,238.84 INSTRUMENT PARTS
149903 PACIFIC BELL $15.90 TELEPHONE SERVICES
149904 PARAGON CABLE $41.28 CABLE SERVICES
149905 PARKHOUSE TIRE,INC. $555.99 TIRES
149906 PEDERSEN COMMUNICATIONS $4,348.00 INSTALLATION OF CABLES
149907 PERSONAL STRENGHTS PUBLICATION $394.01 PUBLICATION
149908 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $620.07 REIMS.PETTY CASH,TRAINING&TRAVEL
149909 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $193,093.20 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3-29-95
149910 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS $5,914.44 CONSULTING SERVICE
149911 POLYPURE,INC. $24,135.22 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3.11-92
149912 POWER PROTECTION $432.48 MISC.HARDWARE
149913 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $112.00 ICE FOR SAMPLES
149914 PROMINENT FLUID CONTROL,INC. $799.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 02/06/96 PAGE 5
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 02/07M POSTING DATE 02/07/98
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
149915 PRYOR REPORT $532.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
149916 PUBLIC SECTOR EXCELLENCE $7,200.00 TRAINING CONSULTANT-RISK MGMF
149917 PUMPING SOLUTIONS,INC. $298.33 PUMP PARTS
149915 PYRAMID FENCE COMPANY $2,275.00 FENCING INSTALLATION
149919 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $590.59 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS
149920 R&R INSTRUMENTS E1,837.70 ELECTRIC PARTS
149921 REMEDYTEMP $2.245.53 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
149922 DON RICHARDSON WATER TRUCK $8.218.50 WATER TANK
149923 RM MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL AND/OR RITTAL $2,126.67 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
149924 IAWRENCE ROOD $186.85 EXPENSE REPORT
149925 BANDON ENGINEERING,INC. $750.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES
149926 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS &154.83 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
149927 BASCO ELECTRIC $2,220.00 CONTRACT SERVICES
149926 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTL $38,887.70 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.&8.94
149929 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $3,678.03 SPECIALTY GASES
149930 SENTIENT SYSTEMS,INC. $19.619.87 FACILITATOR SERVICES
149931 SHURELUCK SALES $3.819.75 TOOLS/HARDWARE
149932 THE SMITH GROUP $3,487.10 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
149933 SOLAR TURBINES INCORPORATED $304.98 MECHANICAL PARTS
x 149934 SO COAST AIR QUALITY $2.594.79 PERMIT FEES
149935 SO CALIF EDISON CO S59A77.32 POWER
149936 SO CALIF EDISON CO $16,241.93 POWER
13 149937 SO.CALIFORNIA MARINE INST. 8800.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
n 149938 STAMEN Z.SPASSOFF P.E. $4,000.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19-2
1 149939 SUMMIT STEEL $602.02 METAL
149940 SUPERB ONE-HOUR PHOTO $36.26 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
149941 SYMCAS $5.657.92 SOFTWARE LICENSE
149942 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $2,728.03 MECHANICAL PARTS
149943 TIRE WAREHOUSE 91.113.62 TIRES
149944 TONER SYSTEM INTERNATIONAL $1.412.18 PRINTER SUPPLIES
149945 TRANE $352.41 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
149946 TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY,INC. $17,503.84 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.O.&1144
149947 TRUCK&ALTO SUPPLY,INC. $535.71 TRUCK PARTS
149948 TRUESDAIL LABS $1,128.10 LAB SERVICES
149949 JG TUCKER&SON,INC. $2.326.54 INSTRUMENT PARTS
149950 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $40300 LAB SUPPLIES
149951 UNISOURCEWOR BUTLER PAPER $837.49 OFFICE SUPPLIES
149952 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $805.70 PARCEL SERVICES
149953 VWR SCIENTIFIC $145.42 LAB SUPPLIES
149954 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $2,089.95 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
149955 VANIER BUSINESS FORMS $975.95 OFFICE SUPPLIES
149956 VARIAN ASSOCIATES,INC. $1.298.61 LAB SUPPLIES
149957 VERTEX SYSTEMS $3,570.26 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT
149958 VILLAGE NURSERIES $326.26 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES
149959 WACKENHUT CORP. $27.296.79 CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS
149960 WAL-CON CONSTRUCTION CO. $170.041.19 CONSTRUCTION 5-37-3
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 02J06196 PAGE 6
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 02/07/96 POSTING DATE 02107I85
WARRANTNO. VENDOR
149961 WAL-CON CONSTRUCTION CO. $8,400.89 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
149962 CARL WARREN&CO. $300,00 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR
149963 WAXIE $4,79261 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
149964 WESTERN CITY MAGAZINE $63.00 SUBSCRIPTION
149965 WESTERN COMPONENT SALES NORTH $417.32 LAB SUPPLIES
149966 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $35.993.49 CAUSTIC SODA MO&2395
149967 WEST-LTTE SUPPLY CO. E1,015.13 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
149968 WESCO $290.89 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
149969 WOLFE AND ASSOCIATES.INC. $1,688.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
149910 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. E291.57 LAB SUPPLIES
149971 YELLOW SPRINGS INSTRUMENT CO. $37.14 LAB SUPPLIES
149972 AG TECH COMPANY $58,580.03 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9A1
149973 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. $60.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL
149974 AWARDS B TROPHIES $147.50 PLAQUES
149975 BANANA BLUEPRINT $227.10 PRINTING M.O.1"7-94
149976 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $4,340.62 LAB SUPPLIES
149977 BIO-GRO DIVISION $84.345,91 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 4-26.95
149978 COMPUSERVE E126.02 COMPUTER SERVICES
P1 149979 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $1,463.66 ELECTRIC PARTS
149980 ENCHANTER,INC. $3.500.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5-24-95
H 149981 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC, $867.70 LAB SERVICES
00 149982 EST SAND AND GRAVEL,INC. $769.35 ROAD BASE MATERIALS
H 3 149983 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE E7,568.75 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.B. 10-9.91
� 149984 FILTER SUPPLY CO. E33.97 FILTERS
149985 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $689.16 LAB SUPPLIES
149986 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $360,68 PHOTO SUPPLIES
149987 NEW HORIZONS COMPUTER CENTERS,INC. E5,340.00 SOFTWARE TRAINING CLASSES
149988 BOLT DELIVERY $99.30 FREIGHT
$2.602,740.34
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 02/06196 PAGE 7
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 02/07M POSTING DATE 02/07196
SUMMARY AMOUNT
91 CONSTR FUND 9443.50
92 OPER FUND $3.135.08
12 CAP FAC FUND $11.91
82 CONSTR FUND $1,886.50
B3 OPER FUND $42,711.83
83 CAP FAC FUND $380.028.95
93 CONSTR FUND $1.074.60
05 OPER FUND $12.132.11
05 CONSTR FUND $670.50
96 CAP FAC FUND $59.54
86 CONSTR FUND $183.00
#7 OPER FUND $15.594.71
97 CAP FAC FUND $46.079.10
87 CONSTR FUND $515.00
411 OPER FUND $4,148.29
A11 CAP FAC FUND $190.778.76
011 CONSTR FUND $227.00
�y A14 CAP FAC FUND $17.05
K 6566 OPER FUND 52,454.64
y A566 CAP FAC FUND 170.082.68
b 9667 OPER FUND 2.258.68
-3 87&14 OPER FUND 6,341.96
JT OPER FUND $1,097,537.60
CORF $377,666.63
J SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $63,272.44
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL E183,218.02
$2,602,740.34
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
) SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, 1 hereby certify that
the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7,
11, 13 and 14 held on , 19_fAwas duly posted for public
inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on .23 , 19&
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this ` day of
1 s�G
Penny Kyle, S tary ach of the
Boards of Dire c rs of 5bunty Sanitation
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14
of Orange County, California
B£Irartnslf2]A