HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-01-24 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
January 19, 1996
NOTICE OF MEETING
Rom: JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
(714)9622411 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
mailing midres.: NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14
R0.Boa 9127 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Fountain Valley,M
9272"127
� .da,ma.: WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 24, 1996 - 7:30 P.M.
10144 B1m tome
Fountain Valle,C4
92708-7018 DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Memla
Agendm The Regular Meeting of the Joint Boards of Directors of County
• Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange
clue. County, California, will be held at the above location, time and date.
Anaheim
Brea
Buena Park
Lypress
Feunuen uglier Bo a ary
Fu
Fullerton
Huntington Beach
ry ne
Le Habra a Palma Tentatively-Scheduled Upcoming Meetings
Los Alamiws
Newport Beach STEERING COMMITTEE - WednesdayJanua 24, 1996,
i ange . ry
Placenta at 5:30 p.m.
Santa Ana
Beal Beach STRATEGIC PLANNING WORKSHOP - Saturday,January 27, 1996,
Brenton T.adn FOR ALL DIRECTORS at 9:00 a.m.
Y P.
lla Perk
Verb.and AD HOC COMMITTEE RE - Wednesday,January 31. 1996
county of orange LANDFILL ACQUISITION at 5:30 pm
PLANNING, DESIGN AND - Thursday, February 1, 1996, at 5:30 pm
sanitary Dl.tricts CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE
Costa Mesa
Garden crave OPERATIONS,MAINTENANCE AND - Wednesday, February 7, 1996, at 5:30 pm
Mltlway city TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE
water omltr cts
FINANCE,ADMINISTRATIVE AND - Wednesday, February 14, 1996, at 5:30 pm
kwme Ranch HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE
SPECIAL JOINT BOARDS OF - Wednesday, February 14, 1996, at 7:30 p.m.
DIRECTORS MEETING
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - Wednesday, February 21, 1996,at 5:30 pm
A Public Was[ewa[er antl Envmnnmental Management Agency Committed no Pratcc61 the Emwnment Since 1954
JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES
Executive Committee Meetinas Joint Board Meetinas
January Jan 17, 1996 Jan 24, 1996
February Feb 21, 1996 Feb 28, 1996
March Mar 20, 1996 Mar 27, 1996
April Apr 17, 1996 Apr 24, 1996
May May 15, 1996 May 22, 1996
June Jun 19, 1996 Jun 26, 1996
July Jul 17, 1996 Jul 24, 1996
August None Scheduled Aug 28, 1996
September Sep 18, 1996 Sep 25, 1996
October Oct 16, 1996 Oct 23, 1996
November None Scheduled Nov 20, 1996
December None Scheduled Dec 18, 1996
January Jan 15, 1997 Jan 22, 1997
AGENDA
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708
REGULAR MEETING
JANUARY 24, 1996 -7:30 P.M.
In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this
agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the Districts'Administrative Offices not less
than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to
each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary.
i
In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Boards
j for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an
I emergency item or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the i
j attention of the Districts subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a !
j supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. I
i
(1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation
(2) Roll call
(3) Appointment of Chair pro tem, if necessary
(4) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating
to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders)
(5) Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Boards on specific agenda items
or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair,
speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks
may be limited to five minutes.
Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda
cannot have action taken by the Boards of Directors except as authorized by Section
54954.2(b).
01/24/96
(6) The Joint Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on
miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for
information only and require no action by the Directors.
(a) Report of Joint Chair; consideration of Resolutions or commendations,
presentations and awards
(b) Report of General Manager
(c) Report of General Counsel
(7) EACH DISTRICT
If no corrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will be deemed
approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair:
District 1 - December 13, 1995 regular
District 2 - December 13, 1995 regular
District 3 - December 13, 1995 regular
District 5 - December 13, 1995 regular
District 6 - December 13, 1995 regular
District 7 - December 13, 1995 regular
District 11 - December 13, 1995 regular
District 13 - December 13, 1995 regular
District 14 - November 15, 1995 regular, and December 13, 1995 regular
(8) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts
as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for
each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District.)
(Carried over from 12113195 Mtg.) /11 15/95 1129/95
DISTRICT NO. 14 - s 311.129.19 s 4,563.18
1 /213/95 1227195 01/10/96
ALL DISTRICTS
Joint Operating Fund - $775,555.24 $747,037.33 $590262.64
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 393,437.92 1,311,228.89 260,472.07
Joint Working Capital Fund - 471,937.47 212,140.44 225.832.58
Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 69,738.87 9,225.20 18,647.75
DISTRICT NO. 1 - 560.60 3,000.00 9,528.64
DISTRICT NO.2 - 30,632.89 1,113.50 46,632.37
DISTRICT NO. 3 - 188.228.36 147,793.23 69.965.25
DISTRICT NO,5 - 4,801.27 648.54 18,008.38
DISTRICT NO.6 - 161.60 62.31 2,593.23
DISTRICT NO,7 - 479,491.04 42,619.70 50,673.44
DISTRICT NO. 11 - 592.00 108,379.84 129,423.70
DISTRICT NO. 13 - 0.00 0.00 154.75
DISTRICT NO. 14 - 15.95 19,941.50 465.52
DISTRICTS NOS. 5$6 JOINT 278,432.18 25,581.80 80,847.33
DISTRICTS NOS.6&7 JOINT 2,042.89 211.28 1,960.71
DISTRICTS NOS. 7 8 14 JOINT - 6,707.57 15.83 5,169.96
122E 335.85 $2.628.999,39 $1,510,638.32
-2-
01124196
-� (6) The Joint Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on
miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for
information only and require no action by the Directors.
(a) Report of Joint Chair, consideration of Resolutions or commendations,
presentations and awards
(b) Report of General Manager
(c) Report of General Counsel
(7) EACH DISTRICT
If no corrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will be deemed
approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair:
District 1 - December 13, 1995 regular
District 2 - December 13, 1995 regular
District 3 - December 13, 1995 regular
District 5 - December 13, 1995 regular
District 6 - December 13, 1995 regular
District 7 December 13, 1995 regular
District 11 - December 13, 1995 regular
District 13 - December 13, 1995 regular
District 14 - November 15, 1995 regular, and December 13, 1995 regular
(8) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts
as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for
each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District)
(Carried over from 12/1"5 INg.) 12/13/95 12/13/95
DISTRICT NO. 14 - $ 311,129.19 $ 4,563.18
12/13/95 12/27/95 01/10/96
ALL DISTRICTS
Joint Operating Fund - $775,555.24 $747,037.33 $590,262.64
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 393.437.92 1,311,228.89 260,472.07
Joint Working Capital Fund - 471,937.47 212,140.44 225.832.58
Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 69,738.87 9,225.20 18,647.75
DISTRICT NO. 1 - 560.60 3,000.00 9,528.64
DISTRICT NO.2 - 30,632.89 1,113.50 46.632.37
DISTRICT NO.3 - 188,228.36 147,793.23 69,965.25
DISTRICT NO.5 - 4,801.27 648.54 18,008.38
DISTRICT NO,6 - 161.60 62.31 2,59323
DISTRICT NO,7 - 479,491.04 42,619.70 50,673.44
DISTRICT NO. 11 - 592.00 108,379.84 129,423.70
DISTRICT NO. 13 - 0.00 0.00 154.75
DISTRICT NO. 14 - 15.95 19,941.50 465.52
DISTRICTS NOS 5&6 JOINT - 278,432.18 25,581.80 80.847.33
DISTRICTS NOS. 6&7 JOINT - 2,042.89 211.28 1,960.71
DISTRICTS NOS 7& 14 JOINT - 6,707.57 15,83 5,169.9
6
$2.702.335.85 $2,628,999.39 $1,510,638.32
-2-
av24(96
(9) CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM g(a) THROUGH 9(c) y
I All matters placed on the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or
i further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the
consent calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there
will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be '
enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for j
resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent
calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. I
Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon
recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be
removed from the consent calendar.
i
i The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar.
........................................................................................................................................................._......................._.._......._..........._.....
Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent
calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows:
ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Consideration of motion authorizing renewal of memberships in the
California Association of Sanitation Agencies (CASA) and the Association
of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies (AMSA) for the 1996 calendar year.
(b) PDC95-26 Consideration of Resolution No. 96-1, accepting Purchase of
Spark Ignited Engines for use in Central Power Generation Systems, Job
No. J-19A, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion
and approving final Closeout Agreement for a final total contract amount of
$19,436,644.82 (original awarded contract amount of $18,968,113.00).
DISTRICT 3
(c) PDC95-26 Consideration of the following actions relative to the plans and
specifications for Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System,
Reach 2 (5,800 feet North of Rosecrans Avenue to Imperial Highway,
Contract No. 3-38-2:
(1) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans
and specifications for said project, authorizing an addition of
$45,255.68 to the contract with Calfon Construction, Inc. for seven
items of additional work.
-3-
[ITEM (9)(c) CONTINUED ON PAGE 4]
01/24/96
(11) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 5)
(b) (3) PDC96-04 Consideration of Resolution No. 96-3, approving plans
and specifications for Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers 3, 4, and 5
at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-41: Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural
Systems at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-43; Seismic Retrofit at Plant
No. 1, Job No. P1A4; Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers D through
Q at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-48; Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural
Systems at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-50; Seismic Retrofit at Plant
No. 2, Job No. P2-53-2; Tunnel Cover Replacement at Billings
Tunnel at Plant No. 2, SP19950021; Sludge Piping Modification
Primary Sedimentation Basins 6-15, SP19950059, and authorizing
the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids
(Tentative bid date is March 12, 1996).
(4) PD 96-05 Consideration of the following actions relative to
Demolition of Old Laboratory, Job No. J-11-1, and Restoration of
Old Laboratory for Human Resources Department, Job No. J-11-2:
(a) Consideration of motion providing for the conversion of the
Old Laboratory, Job No. J-11-1, to Restoration of Old
Laboratory for Human Resources Department, Job
No. J-11-2, and providing for funds in the amount of
$375,000 for said project.
(b) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to
establish the date for receipt of bids for Interior Asbestos
Removal from Old Laboratory, Job No. J-11-1IA, and
authorizing the budgeted amount of$150,000.00, which was
an approved portion of Job No. J-11-1 (Tentative bid date is
February 13, 1996).
(5) PD 96-06 Consideration of the following actions relative to
Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with John
Carollo Engineers to prepare plans and specifications and to
provide construction support services for Standby Power Reliability
Modifications, Job No. J-33, and Ocean Outfall Reliability
Upgrades, Job No. J-34, providing for additional design and
construction services:
(a) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the
Planning, Design and Construction Committee certification
of the final negotiated fee for said additional services.
-6-
[ITEM (11)(b) CONTINUED ON PAGE 7)
01/24/96
(11) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 6)
(b) (5) (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 96-4, approving Addendum
No. 1 to said agreement with John Carollo Engineers for said
additional services on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus
overhead, subconsultant fees, and fixed profit, for an
additional amount not to exceed $226,740.00, increasing the
total authorized compensation from $950,252.00 to an
amount not to exceed $1,176,992.00.
(6) OMTS95-041 Consideration of the following actions relative to
Compressed Natural Gas Refueling Station, Job No. P1-51:
(a) Consideration of Resolution No. 96-5, approving
Professional Services Agreement with Southern California
Gas Company (SoCalGas) for design and construction
management services for Compressed Natural Gas
Refueling Station, Job No. P1-51, on an hourly-rate basis for
labor plus overhead, for an amount not to exceed
$64.500.00.
(b) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to
solicit bids re Purchase of Equipment for Compressed
Natural Gas Refueling Station, Job No. P1-51A; and
authorizing the General Manager to award a purchase order
contract to the lowest bidder for an amount not to exceed
$399,300.00, plus applicable taxes and freight.
(7) Consideration of motion to receive and file monthly investment
report regarding performance monitoring of PIMCO.
(8) DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7 & 11 (ONLYI
FAHR96-01 Consideration of the following actions recommended
by AIG Financial Products Corp. (AIG), for replacement of Letter of
Credit, Refunding Certificates of Participation, Series 1992, as
follows:
(a) Consideration of the following resolutions, approving
Substitute Standby Certificate Purchase Agreement with
Barclays Bank, and authorizing staff to take all necessary
actions re replacement of the Standby Letter of Credit:
-7-
(ITEM (11)(b) CONTINUED ON PAGE 8]
01/24/96
'j (11) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 7)
(b) (8) (a) District No. Resolution No.
1 96-6-1
2 96-7-2
3 96-8-3
5 96-9-5
6 96-10-6
7 96-11-7
11 96-12-11
(b) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to retain the
services of a bond counsel firm for the transaction, as
recommended by General Counsel, in an amount not to
exceed $25,000, to be reimbursed to the Districts by AIG;
and, authorizing the General Manager to execute said
agreement, approved as to form by General Counsel.
(c) Consideration of motion directing staff to submit all
necessary documents for this transaction to the Boards of
Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 &
11. at the January 24, 1996 meeting for execution.
(9) FAHR96-02 Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a
purchase order to AmeriData for Four Compaq Server-Class
Computers (Specification No. E-262R-2), for use as Districts'-wide
network servers, for a total amount not to exceed $135,875.00, plus
sales tax and 1% CMAS fees.
(10) FAHR96-03 Consideration of Resolution No. 96-13, amending
Resolution No. 95-105, authorizing the establishment of provisions
for Programmers covered by the Professional Employees MOU for
standby and callback pay.
(11) FAHR96-05 Consideration of Resolution No. 96-14, amending
Resolution No. 95-105, rescinding provisions granting a 1% salary
increase to all employees re retiree medical health premium offset
program.
(12) FAHR96-08 Consideration of motion authorizing staff to report to
Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) the
Sanitation Districts' position on the Finance Chapter of SCAG's
Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide.
-8-
ov24f96
(12) ALL DISTRICTS
FAHR96-06 Consideration of the following actions re Benchmarking and
Performance Measurement Update:
(a) Verbal report by General Manager
(b) Consideration of motion to receive and file staff report dated January 10,
1996 re Benchmarking and Performance Measurement Update.
(13) ALL DISTRICTS
Update re proposed acquisition of County of Orange Integrated Waste
Management System.
(a) Consideration of Resolution No. 96-15, directing that the Orange County
Board of Supervisors be requested to file a Resolution of Application with
the Orange County Local Agency Formation Commission initiating
proceedings relative to proposed formation of County Sanitation District
No. 99 for acquisition, maintenance, and operation of a landfill and refuse
disposal system
(14) ALL DISTRICTS
Update concerning developments related to the County's Commingled
Investment Pool.
(15) ALL DISTRICTS
CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on
this agenda as a regular meeting of the Boards,the Chair may convene the
Boards in closed session to consider matters of pending real estate
negotiations,pending or potential litigation,or personnel matters, pursuant to
Government Code Sections 54956.8,54956.9,54957 or 54957.6,as noted.
Reports relating to(a) purchase and sale of real property; (b)matters of
pending or potential litigation; (c) employment actions or negotiations with
employee representatives;or which are exempt from public disclosure under {
the California Public Records Act,may be reviewed by the Boards during a f
permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such
time as final actions are taken by the Boards on any of these subjects,the
minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information.
[ITEM NO. (15) CONTINUED ON PAGE 101
01/24/96
(15) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 9)
(a) Convene in closed session, if necessary
(b) (1) Confer with General Counsel re status of litigation, County
Sanitation Districts of Orange County v. E.L. Yeager Construction
Company, at al. (Government Code Section 54956.9)
(c) Reconvene in regular session
(d) Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session
(16) ALL DISTRICTS
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(17) ALL DISTRICTS
Matters which a Director would like staff to report on at a subsequent meeting
(18) ALL DISTRICTS
Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and
staff report
(19) DISTRICT 1
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(20) DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(21) DISTRICT
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(22) DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(23) DISTRICT 3
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(24) DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(25) DISTRICT 5
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(26) DISTRICT 5
Consideration of motion to adjourn
-10-
01124196
(27) DISTRICT 6 t
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(28) DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(29) DISTRICT 7
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(30) DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(31) DISTRICT 11
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(32) DISTRICT 11
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(33) DISTRICT 13
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(34) DISTRICT 13
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(35) DISTRICT 14
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(36) DISTRICT 14
Consideration of motion to adjourn
....._.._................................-........................_...............................-............._.........---.....-.......--.--- — --- --
NOTICE TO DIRECTORS: To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the
Joint Boards, Directors shall submit items to the Board Secretary not later than the close of
i business 14 days preceding the Joint Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on
i the agenda all items submitted by Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and
all formal communications.
Board Secretary: Penny Kyle (714) 962-2411, ext. 2026
Secretary: Patricia L. Jonk (714) 962-2411, ext. 2029 1
Secretary: Janet L. Gray (714) 962-2411, ext. 2027
_11_
J:W PDOCS$AG96l1M W Ab1
n COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
January 18, 1996
phone:
(71419622411
To the Chair and Members
mailing addasa: of the Joint Boards of Directors
P.O.Ba,9127
Fousain Valle,CA
9272BZ127 Subject: Board Letter
mete address:
10944 she Aina.
F4ultled Vauay.CA The following are items that I think will interest you as Directors of the Districts.
9270 7016
Strategic Plan Workshop for Directors
nlambm, I want to remind you of the workshop being held January 27, 1996 between 9 a.m.
ftimices and noon on our new Strategic Plan. Staff is holding a series of workshops to help
• define the direction of the Districts in the future. Other invitees include the business
ciuee community, government regulators, environmentalists, and the media. Please make
every effort to attend. The issues being discussed are vital to our planning efforts.
Anaheim
B
9uene Pearkrk Grand Jury and WACO Support Water Reclamation
Cypress
Ftenuen Valley Water reclamation is an important part of our long-term mission. Our 1989 Master
F0lkabom
Beach Plan included water reclamation; we are actively studying the feasibility of a lar e-
Hunwg.n Beach Y YI 9 Y 9
Ir„ns scale reclamation project with the Orange County Water District; and our future
La Habra strategic planning efforts will re-evaluate our water reclamation plans to determine
Le Palma
Los Alamitos and whether their scopeapproach remain relevant and realistic. The 1994-95 Grand
PP
A'eapert each Jury addressed the issue of water resources in Orange County and the role of water
orange reclamation in meeting future needs. The Grand Jury report (see attached
Placentia newspaper article concluded that wider development and use of water reclamation
Santa Ana ) P
seal Beach should be promoted. The Water Advisory Committee of Orange County (WACO)
s.ntan unanimously endorsed a resolution of support for the Grand Jury's position on water
Win Pay reclamation. A copy of WACO's resolution is also attached.
verve Linde
Blake Anderson named to new National Research Council Committee on
Doan, of Oren, Watershed Management
sanitary Disvlc. Blake Anderson has been named to a new 13-person Watershed Management
cos.Mase Committee formed by the National Research Council (NRC). The Committee will
Gordan Grope evaluate and report on the various watershed management efforts now taking place
Midway cty in the United States and recommend an approach for future efforts throughout the
water DisvlRa nation. The report is expected to take between 18 and 24 months to complete.
Three case studies will be used by the Committee to develop its findings.
Irene Reach
A Public Wastewater and Enlaron m ntel Management Agency Committed to Protecting the Emrronment Since 1954
Chair and Members of
the Joint Boards of Directors
Page 2
January 18, 1996
The term "watershed management" is loosely applied to a wide range of planning and
management efforts that are being applied at the local level to bring site specific solutions to
ongoing environmental, resource and development problems contained within a particular river
basin or watershed. It is a method of reconciling the conflict of purposes that often arises when
trying to address water supply, water quality, flood control, natural habitat, economic growth,
recreation, and other issues. It replaces federally-mandated, "one size fits all" solutions with
locally-developed solutions.
The Committee consists of representatives from government, business and academic
institutions located throughout the County. They were chosen for their special competencies
and with regard to achieving balance on the Committee.
Blake has previously served on an NRC committee. From 1990 to 1993 he served on the
Committee on Managing Wastewater in Coastal Urban Areas which produced a 400-page
report of the same title. The report has achieved national and international attention. It has
been translated into several foreign languages and is used as an academic text book and as a
public policy reference book.
Recently, its recommendations helped form the basis of San Diego receiving a site-specific
ocean discharge permit issued by the EPA in accordance with Section 301(h) of the federal
Clean Water Act. San Diego, like the Sanitation Districts, is successfully protecting the marine
resources off its coast without having to needlessly spend hundreds of millions of taxpayers'
dollars to build and operate full secondary treatment for its discharge to the Pacific Ocean.
"Managing Wastewater in Coastal Urban Areas", like 'Watershed management", uses site-
specific solutions to manage site-specific conditions. Both concepts begin with the philosophy
that responsible public policy must require only those expenditures and solutions that
adequately and cost effectively protect the environment and the public health.
"Managing Wastewater in Coast Urban Areas"will help us in our permit reapplication efforts
during 1996. Our application, which we submitted to EPA in August 1989, is based on a site-
specific approach to our wastewater treatment methods and to how we manage our other
systems. The NRC endorsement of this approach will be one of the arguments we will use in
advancing our case with the public and with the regulators.
The NRC was organized by the National Academy of Sciences in 1916 to associate the broad
community of science and technology with the Academy's purposes of furthering knowledge
and advising the federal government. The NRC is the principal agency of the National Academy
of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering in providing services to the government,
the public, and the scientific and engineering communities. The National Research Council's
governing board is drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National
Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine.
The first meeting of the Watershed Management Committee will occur in late February or early
March in Washington, D.C.
Chair and Members of
the Joint Boards of Directors
Page 3
January 18, 1996
Letters to the Editor. Articles and News Releases
Attached is a copy of a Letter to the Editor from Garden Grove Mayor Bruce A. Broadwater that
appeared in both The Times and The Orange County Register on January 14. Mr. Broadwater
did not attend our presentation on January 11 to the League of California Cities—Orange County
Division, which would have answered many of his questions and provided him with accurate
information. Staff is preparing a response to both newspapers, and will copy Mayor Broadwater
in the event our response is not printed.
A copy of a faxed press release from Assemblyman Cur Pringle's office on his Special District
Consolidation proposed legislation is enclosed. To date we have not received a copy of the bill.
Attached is a copy of a letter signed by Chair Cox to Mr. Pringle regarding the consolidation
efforts currently underway.
Also attached is an editorial which appeared in The Register on January 2, 1996 on
Assemblyman Pringle's proposed special districts bill.
I also received copies of two articles by columnist Neil Morgan that appeared in The San Diego
Union-Tribune on EPA's and San Diego's struggle over secondary treatment, which are
extremely interesting and timely to the Districts in our efforts to obtain a new NPDES permit.
Patent and Ownership Riahts of Inventions by Districts' Employees
On occasion, employees have developed ideas or products that meet requirements for patents.
Attached is an opinion by General Counsel on inventions by Districts' employees, including a
draft agreement re assignment of inventions, patents and other personal property rights.
Summary of California Constitution Revision Commission (CCRCI Public Hearings
Attached are copies of the quarterly report of CCRC activities, as well as an update from CASA,
for your information. The Commission's final phase is to complete recommendations to the
Governor and Legislature. I have been invited to participate in Project CPR's discussion
regarding "Performance Management in Government" on February 9 at the Koll Company.
Project CPR is a multi-year program sponsored by the California Council for Environmental and
Economic Balance in support of the CCRC.
Tuition Assistance Policy and Procedures Adopted
Enclosed is a copy of the newly-adopted Tuition Assistance Policy and Procedures. The
Districts were one of only four agencies that did not have some kind of tuition assistance
program. This program is funded by our training budget and is not considered an employee
benefit—but rather a Districts' requirement.
q,.
Chair and Members of
the Joint Boards of Directors
Page 4
January 16, 1996
Membership on Proposed New County Sanitation District for Solid Waste
Attached is a January 10, 1996 memorandum from General Counsel outlining the particulars re
makeup of the membership of the new District for solid waste, presently under consideration by
the Districts. This memorandum will be included in the governance portion of the LAFCO
application. It is also being sent to all City Managers and General Managers of the Sanitary
Districts.
Natural Gas Problems Encountered in Newport Beach re Construction of Contract
No. 5-37-3
Districts 5 and 6 are constructing a new 30- and 36-inch gravity sewer in Pacific Coast Highway
through the City of Newport Beach as a replacement for an existing sewer. The alignment of
the new sewer is such that the construction will intersect areas adjacent to Hoag Hospital with
high concentrations of naturally-occurring methane and hydrogen sulfide gases in the soils.
The Districts' engineering staff is working closely with our contractor, our Safety Division, the
City of Newport Beach, and Hoag Hospital to assure that the construction is carried out safely
and with minimal impact to the surrounding community. Longer-term plans to help mitigate the
natural gas seepage problem are currently being developed by the Newport Beach staff. These
mitigation measures may include a gas collection pipeline, installed by our contractor in our
sewer trench, to collect and convey the gas to an existing gas collection and Flare system
operated by Hoag Hospital. It is proposed that the gas collection pipeline would be owned and
operated by either the City or Hoag.
We will continue to update you on this matter. If you have questions on this project, please
contact David Ludwin directly at 714/962-2411, extension 5000.
Demooraohic Analysis Unit—Cal State Fullerton
One of the casualties of the bankruptcy was the demographic analysis and forecasting unit,
which had been part of the County CAO's office. Because good data is important for planning
the County's services and infrastructure, several agencies have been working together to
develop a transitional solution. A Memorandum of Understanding between Cal State Fullerton
and Orange County interests (OCTA, League of Cities, Orange County, TCA and the Districts)
has been entered into in order to transfer this function to the Fullerton Foundation. The total
budget is $350,000, of which $25,000 will be paid by the Districts. We are using their data for
the Strategic Plan. This cost will be charged against the Strategic Plan budget. Discussions
are now underway regarding the establishment of a Council of Governments (COG) for Orange
County. If this plan goes forward, it would make sense to then transfer this function to the COG.
Chair and Members of
the Joint Boards of Directors
Page 5
January 16, 1996
Bleach Replacement of Liquid Chlorine at Plant No. 2
A temporary bleach (chlorine) facility that provides emergency final effluent disinfection is in the
final stages of construction at Plant No. 2. Scheduled completion was the week of January 15,
1996. Upon completion of the temporary station, the liquid chlorine stored at Plant No. 2 would
be returned to the vendor.
The removal of liquid chlorine at the plant will reduce costly maintenance on the chlorine feed,
remove the last chemical on Plant No. 2's site that is on the EPA's hazardous list, eliminate the
need to write a $100,000 risk management plan, and improve the safety of Plant No. 2's staff,
contractors and the public around the plant.
On January 15, 1996, a bleach pipeline ruptured, which will delay the station's use for the time it
takes to investigate and correct the failure.
Emission Compliance Testing of Central Power Generation System Engines
There have been recent activities surrounding the December emissions compliance testing of
the Central Power Generation System (CGS) engines at both plants. Preliminary source test
results indicate that both plants exceed the permit limit for Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC).
All other criteria pollutants were within the permit limits. The results of the source tests showed
that a significant component of the VOC is heavy hydrocarbons which would normally not be
expected when combusting natural gas or digester gas. Staff does not know the cause of the
high VOCs. Staff is working with Advanced Engine Technology Corporation, an engineering
consultant that assisted the Districts during the initial acceptance and compliance testing of the
engines last year. The permit requires the Districts to successfully complete source testing by
February 14, 1996. Staff and the consultant will assess possible causes of the VOC emissions
and retest the engines prior to the February 14 date. If the engines continue to fail the
compliance test, the Districts may pursue a variance from SCAOMD's Hearing Board until the
engines meet all emission limits. While the Districts are likely to be granted a variance, we may
be required to offset up to 200 pounds per day of VOC emission reduction credits (ERC) to raise
our permit emission limits. The Districts previously purchased these types of ERCs, which
originally cost approximately$2,000 per pound.
Collection Facilities Maintenance Manager Position
Nick Arhontes has been appointed Maintenance Manager of the Collection Facilities Division
replacing Ken Ramey, who has retired after 31 years with the Districts. Nick will now manage
both the Collection Facilities and Plant Maintenance Divisions.
Chair and Members of
the Joint Boards of Directors
Page 6
January 18, 1996
Presentation to the Orange County Division—League of California Cities
On January 11, Chair Cox made a presentation to the League on our landfill acquisition
activities. Feedback from several sources suggest it was very well received. The slides used in
that presentation are being sent to all City Managers (except Costa Mesa, Garden Grove, and
Westminster) along with Tom Woodruffs model Bow control agreement and Executive Summary
of same.
If you have questions on any of these items, please call me.
Respectfully,
Ci
Donald F. McIntyre
General Manager
DFM:jt
Xwwol- Fne RDMm 124W
Enclosures: December 8, 1995 Register article; Renewed effort urged to reclaim wastewater.
Resolution of Water Advisory Committee of Orange County.
January 14, 1996 Letter to Editor, Register, Perhaps it's time to trash the county
sanitation districts.
January 2, 1996 Editorial, Register, A move to privatization.
Press Release from the office of Assemblyman Curt Pringle, December 21, 1995;
Pringle Announces Special District Consolidation Proposal.
December 10, 1995 San Diego Union-Tribune article by Neil Morgan; The 'trial of
the century' was about sewage.
December 12, 1995 San Diego Union-Tribune article by Neil Morgan; Quiet
heroes and high drama in sewage case.
December 18, 1995 Opinion by Counsel re Patent and Ownership Rights of
Inventions by Districts' Employees.
Nov., Dec., 1995, and Jan., 1996 CCRC News Publication.
December 14, 1995 letter from CASA re CRC's Community Charter Proposal and
Special Districts.
Memo dated January 9, 1996 transmitting Tuition Assistance Policy and
Procedure.
Copies of handout—Orange County Division's League of California Cities
January 11, 1996 meeting.
Memo dated January 10, 1996 from General Counsel re Membership on
Proposed New County Sanitation District for Solid Waste.
Executive Summary and draft Model Flow Control Agreements re Proposed New
County Sanitation District for Solid Waste.
ORANGE COUNTY SANI I A I ION DISTRICTS
NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS
Name of Paper Secllan Page Date Subject
!�. IT QCIi/STER NEk�s J(0 8[7CC 95 �CL/a/NIEO L✓/l1� �'
Renewed ettort urge
to reclaim wastewater
f. .
SANTA ANA—Orange County acre feet of reclaimed water in '•rut;
needs new ways of using milllons the fiscal year ending June 30,
I of gallons of wastewater to re- 1994,according to the 1995 Annu- i ,^G�
! duce its dependence on drinking at Status Report on Reclaimed
AYnter from the Colorado River Water Use produced by the
9nd other sources,according to a Orange County Water District.
grand jury report released An acre foot Is enough water to EUGENE GARCINT.,The Orange County Register,
Thursday. a supply a family of five for a year. Waste water spews from an inlet pipe at the Michelson Reclamation Plant.
1 "Orange County's natural re- Rut the County Sanitation Dis-
sources no longer meet the needs trios Flush another 730 million '
or the county's population," the gallons of wastewater a day five RECLAIMED WATER
report says. "The county has not into the ocean; 1993.94
State-of-the-art and award-win- Water districts already make AGENCY (aUR fRRe USE
sling treatment plants for re- reclaimed water as clean as Irvine Ranch Water District_ 6,998A—Golf courses,parks,schools,
claiming water from wastewater drinking water, making racy- commercial
.;. this is a valuable resource, cling possibilities unlimited,said Orange County Water Distrlcta-9,137.2—Golf courses,landscaping,
moat of which is now being lost in Bill Mills, general manager of agriculture,saltwater barrier
the saltwater of the ocean." the Orange County Water Dis- CltyofSan Clemente 535.8—Golf courses,landscaping
The report recommends that trict, the county's largest pro- ElToroWater District 591,0—Golf course,irrigation
the Board re of Supervisors recommends
direct that duce, of reclaimed water. Los AlisosWater District. 1,481.7—Landscaping,agriculture
task force to find new ways to use "Now,it's a matter or convine- Moulton Niguel Water District_ 909.0—Golf courses,parks,landscaping
teclaimed water,that water dis. ing the public that our processes Santa Margarita Water District—2,898.4—Golf courses,landscaping
tricts provide annual reports on are reliable and safe," Mill, South Coast Water District— 516.0—Parks,landscaping
reclaimed-water efforts and that said. "And there's always the Trabuco Canyon Water District—7,760.5—Golfcourses
schools educate students about image that the water Is •Provides reclaimed water to fauntalnvalley,Carter Mesa Santa Ana and HunlBpton Beach.
the benefits of reclaimed water. wastewater in origin," soure,Annual status Report on Redalmed warm Use In Orange county,1995
Orange County used 13,896 - By JONA3HAN VOLZIOlrhe Register
i'The people in Southern California E
don't have much choice but to use
Northern California water.But to "I think there will be increased "There's not a lot of critics about
deliberately put reclaimed sewage reliance on reclaimed water to reclaimed water,it's fairly
into the water supply where you supplement our other water sources widely accepted and it's really
have other alternatives is a can of in the future...There's no question it . growing...but some people never
worms.Don't do it if you don't has to play a role in supplementing change their minds and we have
needto." our drinking water supplies." to accept that"
—Henry).Ongarth,Berkeley,water consultant, —Bob Holquist supervising sanitary —Ken Thompson,Irvine Ranch water
...........- ;.....-..''---. .....:.......- ..n..... ..n i...n�r-.,.:.--
WATER ADVISORY COMMITTEE OF ORANGE COUNTY
A RESOLUTION OF THE WATER ADVISORY COMMITTEE OF
ORANGE COUNTY COMMENDING THE 1994-95 ORANGE GRAND
JURY FOR ITS REPORT:
"WIDER USE OF ORANGE COUNTY RECLAIMED WATER."
WHEREAS, the 1994-95 Orange County Grand Jury is charged with oversight of
county government and the performance of local governments within
Orange County; and
WHEREAS, the Grand Jury established an Environment/Transportation Committee
to study the management of water in Orange County; and
WHEREAS, the Graud Jury recognized that a vast amount of recyclable water is
currently being lost to the oce2a through offshore outfalls; and
WHEREAS, the Grand Jury produced a report to address the use of water that has
been reclaimed by sanitation and water districts throughout the county
and to encourage the planning for wider use of this valuable resource;
and
WHEREAS, the Water Advisory Committee of Orange County was formed to
promote and facilitate the good management of water resources in
Orange County to include water recycling; Now, therefore be it
RESOLVED, that the Water Advisory commends the 1994-95 Orange County Grand
Jury for its efforts to understand and promote water recycling through
releasing its report entitled "Wider Use of Orange County Reclaimed
Water."; and be it further
RESOLVED, that the Water Advisory Committee of Orange County encourages
subsequent Grand Juries to highlight positive aspects of Orange
County water management and to promote water recycling in Orange
County and its environs.
10500 ELLIS AVENUE • P O.BOX 8300 FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92728-8300 TELEPHONE (714) 3783200
,l�^ ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
!J�'l ` NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS
Name of Paper Section Page Dale Subject
0•e. � l�e� COMM. S I 'Iy JG Leffe�S '�'OTYIL �r�0`�-�Uf" CS
The Orange Canty Register LETTERS TO THE EDITOR Sutlthly, Jan. 19, 1996 COMMENTARY 5
Perhaps it's time t® trash the county sanitation districts
he Orange County Sanitation thing to ask users to pay for the real with Orange County business and gov- ly elected by, and therefore directly ate cash. This sale will ultimately re-
Districts had about S450 mg- impacts of their usage on the system, ernment representatives,to mvesti- answerable to,the people of Orange sult in all of us paying more to place
lion invested in the Orange it is quite another and very unreason- gate the matter. In light of all the at- County. trash in our own landfills. If the county
County investment pool. De- able to ask them to pay for planners' tention and publicity,the districts re- Now.the Orange County Board of supervisors wish to sell public assets,
spite losing over$100 mil- pipe dreams. duced the fee from SI.5 million to Supervisors is proposing to sell the like the landfills, in order to generate
lion,they still have sufficient excess These fees are not small. For exam- SM,000,without ever providing any county's landfills to the county sanita- revenues to cover their poor invest.
cash to pay S250 million for the land- ple,one business that is proposing to adequate justification for even the re- tion districts. If the sanitation districts ments, then those assets should be mid
fills. I think that all Orange County relocate in Orange County from Los duced amount. are willing to do things like the excess to tbe.bighest private bidder.The citi•
taxpayers would like to know just why Angeles County,which would employ The people who adopted this fee,and capacity charge to their customers, was of Orange County do not deserve
a public agency has so much cash on hundreds of new workers,was asked who are making Orange County inhos, what would they be willing to do to and cannot afford to pay for their land-
hand with no particular plans for its to pay about$1.5 million above normal pliable to new businesses,are not even those who used the landfills? fills twice. On the other hand, if the
use. permit costs.This fee has been a topic directly elected to serve on the Orange Aside from the issue of whether the county just wants to get out of the
One reason the districts have so of discussion in corporate boardrooms County Sanitation Districts Board of Orange County Sanitation Districts can landfill business,it could merely turrj .
much extra cash is outrageous fees both here and overseas and makes Directors.This board's members are be trusted to run the landfills,such a over control of the landfills to the cit-,
like the excess capacity charge.This Orange County a much less attractive appointed by the agencies served by sale would mean than Orange County lea,who control a majority of the
exorbitant fee is imposed on new busi- business location.The potential impact the districts,and are not in any way taxpayers,who have already bought waste flow going to the landfills in the
nesses to pay for the increased capaci- of this fee is an great that the Orange accountable to the people over whose and paid for the landfills,will be first place.
ty needed at the regional treatment . County Business Council assembled a lives they exercise such devastating ef- forced to pay for them again,through
plants.The only catch is, the fee is not "Red Team,"including represents- facts. Perhaps it is time for an organ- the Orange County Sanitation Districts. Bruce A. Broadwater
related to any sewer project or any lives from the governor's office, state zation as large• powerful,and wealthy Sale of the landfills will not save the Garden Grove
other real impact, and is only a paper Trade and Commerce Agency, and as the Orange County Sanitation Dis- county any money on an ongoing basis,
projection by the districts. It is one state Sen. Rob Hurtt's office, along tricts to be governed by a board direct- and is meant only to generate immedi- Mr. Broadwater is mayor of Garden Grove.
EDITOfiWS
A move to privatization Z s e
amMys.a mn Rin- Cash-rich elimiel
�rean¢e lcoffee alv91IN dlstrlcts,dlsplaytng a
.1 a wama eras breathtaking -
sever eg.dp into asin--
arrogance toward the
gk nmprthmdvn,eedomprthm
able amhonfl I.uvlal—biunat taxpeyera who funded
then•.. It nui Feat. he overdo. them,refused to help
svnniny a the nmyadit rep of at 86 the count
mmflepedol-teedmnm.E9moa y
wvere wbe heve yes n=gyp- sought ways to ease
ed MNe edvudegnM Its financial liebllllles.
datlms el 1�the ends, ededee
su men— hap s arse Net the
body. meuas emvedmedtlefec under the mentes nrcmeroennve
body. bider the rat rrn;—.co ,
mensilhe ddnfs Fvtheto III earn dapetleldistnmeow file
v8.. h mart rdur tutu bald bias pedep of IheiI Ipv file
dressed
a. the .mtfl 6 tent di veld,in thud,paints noon Hie e.
dbigged men Gsh-nth epeciel di they're so nnmsau and abemrc.
Mda,dis.noire a hrtsM.ting er- Rmlmeliw is nneinly rim a hell-
memp eoverd ln"do'boe ed.. saak Mien dervMeeInI, some
funded them,ndoeed ee hors oat es, mmiilp ed bbyy three
the ewnr9 eme6n were to sap Ins. Teeperam voter dktric a perlmmtoe
fWmkl lleMlitlp.Tormentors".
o the mn.ew: diffeentr most nobudhemur
ThepdkMctniuetedmbnngpeid re berl."ry 'smesellner en
bask every Ins dime of the fade ph tam meld The ben.(n be
that they had mwieely corroded In mvsfetsp Mlhmcegmdn eo build
BY
rcavmr Imbed tlhm (m eM- saadd onsedf re testa oodannth
Ito.of a nemhp�a epetlel(ever- the public reder e.em.
spscierdtstnci M- Mr.Pnoeie.1rd his own old.
Bdak,end.Pen Swendthe lit- meteg.lsetNawmetMlhehed-
yineRmdWs.Dkerrnl. tvplryennawb.heulkdaomfee.
Thiamfubilbieurrmderdainam soon,fnturing Romer Prole of the
moray real by lndrsm tlrrvn,mm Wass Fmmdaren,to esamine on
sink A...af Metresrappah mtlpnoo or epW"berel Ann
in a cdmwvide wodor[ pin. Hswa.....Mmmeemdeand
formed the backdrop(.the Man. boost nd efficiency. Me Mad—e
sort R m.-Inmsaee.."ip.The reality Los gmwingmmbse M mom
smeildsm.- obdmm Owed mmfit.Meevnert both.eopmay—
upp Presentee en vwm to sooner to hes nth been aMaonnad one centres(-
. densheresseftooly.ftervemneted Fes by doe movie Not ale the ear
default no the movV's bad my- reel ehadavy.pedal dieWtm.
man. kdeed,thseeisestl"Keriv rent
Modpi.e,rdlhaddmsr's they Natanargenham nalplenelonithe
were mks for my,sort then they Ilan proposed by Mr.Peddle would
luthe Senses.feet had hem d- huts pnvethnnm, by gmtdng roe
red,.to"no.New"Thor eP t for I.a aleBis print
pemHy frond it rtlnant Hut the orldcuai.laboyloenMwMkPren-
p,boad districts that w.e crying ever.WehenlMtermseeturight
Nggneeim bootlessly
erpeliadM g ov�sdaf o! muivelmttN on!
revs moteet�irke of
mlllI .of dolled inroostt Ins dyvemite he dislodge the enter,cm
...to or ov.Rmms book ea seemed ernvgsmmt. We'll wata
coma er stha mmmains d bearbeta,—end wally.
Wert nor test by oilseeds of a dmamta. pententmiddet.
wmlWtbn plan Nat it vas the yell hemb®muted lmprtdxdy
.preiel sudden' insdaHm Net the opposhe er,rose,—J t tpoe rIvpnuolette
eemIlx Pteksei athey resident hare fined ai Wer mmdkted lergesn he fd host on ins,inbrttlepedeliM.bte,mmser-
ther hadn" bsen independent add edfrom vrinfnnm.
free ba bdsbmd their m.dw: TO be,sue,in faeor of a oodles
Fenny,re..it.of the is.then a eb In range there is star la
Nee more distnete hem bring on melt M .� i�t coo ne,
N.W.binthertrslp1 byegalvg mntmlmtlmMgmarrtmm[end err
Mr.Cnnesio ,gemMinBmme9 Hut wppmt For themuernHm end lib
Nepdr®vN(men.imeyers— odds impu6einfevorofbrtaklne
or residents, see on yekn on cenen of purer.ant these or,
lhart rueds.ILe teethe Wad Wamr gseenl principle:NdrepenWoP
o 0.her hooddes,went one and pH.tion.net bes bitterns]to,ecnnes
homeved Sfd saris fro Vm CnMd' end droumatemn: and Creep
M'•iweson". with Mr. acme. le Cumr9•e renal ermerfmp het Is,
th n the who govemnme done pa prompt a ®die.eding reortm
soled byte..rats prellkred.of Wertheobslwd.M..1abil-
dieWdsi itylhel k se mod a Pon M thesbims
When this,had gene.6.and qua.
the wry sm8ht so..ones of What's certain is there Mr. Prim
the seem or the versus aescid the, eke prepapl con dimulets health,
ride, the rmept wee widely <hot,—eM needed Haim or the
boned.Assert,ly.n,.inamprd Chet.end Dmncp cod of the
the orientsCsaety Water District. -Irc's l.W.g.Thronghen the wen
aid IhM whatever daN the nunfl Iooqg dtecuasim,the bnrdess r mar
wailed it cmld "rearm from me vlll be m oppensne of clang.,In,
bider On Frendom of Warmdtkn noes their wstem has or yieided
Ad." pnvarearien o ebmlined
Mr.Swan or the moon mggralW Mir ndmmienefs�i{ mit did,hwev-
a.y tnufer or ruse,front his sa. t�art the apmdY. ennoble re-
fnpy for henkenpnm events.. apvn onald e.wm tp••port out-ended oleo
.adapts,evyingweuedyourmsn Andltheyedgivene Cirmandhis
p mere Nan you de." rnntp In the first plan.
Wdndythesebnrtauwudldn'1 In nHin of then entryco rerd, the
soft:llhnereheirmme9•it intense enmnaine thing might he Net the
to Impny.e.the Proofs from wee. demands, for rtf.1. .rent even
.hey lave csnmendesnd It. This Imdur.
P _ e1
>' DEC-21-1995 56 39 P=Hr Fax Note 7977 wn ►3 P.81/03
N iwr
CCAom. Ca
Rw01 N4tl1
F. im1
Curt Pringle
MEWELY9aV2MLWS UWOunAMWA=,piRUMOLSVAWMMCAMY MIN 4&"MF p,MU W CUWM s
P08 II DIATB R&LEASE Coataoe# Deborah Goasa]az WAAAMAm '�.Tm
December :11, 1998 (9161 445-8377 aanearW
PRIIQGLL AMR;RMC86 9PSCIAL DISTRICT CONSOIdDATION PROPOSAL
BACRAMR7TO -- Assemblyman ,Curt Pringle (R-Garden Grove) today
announced his ifitenticn-to propose legislation which will
cohsolidate the:mysiad sanitation and water districts throughout
Orange County into one Bounty-wide special district.
"Since thdi bankruptcy, there has been a great deal of talk
about reducing the ovetall size of government in Orange County, ^
Pringle said. °Unfortunately, to date there has been more talk
than action. -
W proposal offers county residents the opportunity to
achieve cost savings by reducing the total number of special
Oistsicts, a Pringle added. "A consolidated board will also offer
Orange, County residents improved services, as well as increased
accountability. "
Local efforts to consolidate special districts have been
ongoing since the early 19801s. As recently as 1994, the Orange
County Grand Jury issued &; report calling for the consolidation of
water districts,, citing .the :Instances of overlapping and
coliflitting authority in waters districts.
NTo data no concrete action has been taken by the agencies in
queation, a Pringle said. "Furthermore, since LAPCO was given the
Authority to initiate consolidations by the Legislature in 1994,
not one district consolidation has occurred.
"She failure to .seize the opportunity presented by the
bankruptcy. to re)n a government in orange County has been the most
dianppoi.nting aspect of the county's financial collapse. ° Pringle
added. "We owe taxpayers a leafier form of government at all
ievels: The consolidation of special districts should only be a
first step in the r8mAking of government as we know it
Aasemhlymau, Pringle will introduce his bill when the
Legislature returns tin Jantlaay 3rd. It's first policy hearing
will be some time in Pebruary.
# # # #
OaraCr o�
m�ayi`aapoata 1s:4�m 7daam'wsa�f 4 Ya m�S aABR P1�+tagmam P�q�3 •►
,:H„>��Pa38a8!saP�a4F P°B��`V��t�sepae�!sap aro'staas
oAu aAa4I!egs a?nScP q'w Paa 6FaAgnzsooa g4 TI845 s7a.4M aAg*U►�
rjknf0=m7 apip
C7gA\FmmgJS aq IisgS Pae qM pp.wwmdns mam:o 2v m0ftuoin aq PI!u)4
SW?71d?P*AT3=L 's+a�nP ang p YTagivafn Ptvoq Aal aq PIaom=U►►
Wn=j appw6Rmoa s m Paraa[a aq PPS g P+ q aq3 ►«
"Ucwttimwuo PAVM
:(�sedo.ca aegc1s�Ba1
'Ol �i9t �3�+4�P�13o sa4mau aqi .�31�
s Se aA}aaal p7mm s=getaca Pmq m qw!w mp ft pat'oMoa(sgwm tmm !s SMOO
sn6tdxeipomaropq
9.4=01 M m SBafAM MOMUB!s aanPa?d3!an! Xq amom t at SY mn3 W.ms P>rp 8a!A+as
saoWo aAjfaaaxajmTp;o JagTQRQ aqt Bagnpa: Sidsms dq':p3daigas 58auss aACSIIspcmips=a
17as!P 18!aads oil" Smnoa at8mk d otiq )OR=aq CtAmoo duwo
m MtAblp=M%i PM V011s1!oes SL M;6 immPnomm 4 316i xrolN et m?guis IF t *ow
PIa�! of d aq: a(gSmno�e aioac loammano9 litiot aXertt 01 t?+�a a5 N:i► . NOS
-jq=nom
m =S°A%M P=PUTM aqM qVMq asagt3o sSgdam 1)10q os 6im O.=OAVq
loa g!rn m P*q toa svq a!14ed tesna3 agt'sasea teem m T^4�eSP4daa.rbgglod?sde[loo ima�4
agim n361tUgrsaadsataspssgataqioN.'Sd6t .Q3o oPiMm
jq=vag spod Sm=agt jo m=s a aot[i!m!;tu ti(ats qto dda Pq 4oas 4x pue`a9*.o, tS
al aco[a'(OOd taaopsanas,ymtoa aqt ai 1=5 aopmim Pa mgm S,AM103Pa�pcAedlo[�lpos�w�m leto 3v 24 1haft"
3�%3Z�+o4 p+�aoJ O?�=zoQ?W�P
Q*°I
•8SRi0atII
Ppoggasa m3=muAvd papeo Pas:opn P P ids=6 UV tWM UD dens sibpkoq
asm;o ATON 'S K=w P:soq"t aAaq A*m== P L 'S1DAM donwm v%m
St UPT=xm sz mo Aq mmuud=as Vnptm fj=oo `4pq=wzLm PImmv tetaads P=
aea 9m qft 6aaa!agap eMPIS 7 Ran e7 Klao;q L%dw*mR,AevoD ego 5661 ou-matgoia
V!as!p( *06
r�aoet! msmm,&apua-Amwo a('BTas'am *two m.sm; AV leova mft paa ao;tst!ass
pa?zAat oqi atspgosaoa 1(!rA gasgA+�Odosd s toTpq 9661*)aPAOX oqs ao maid Ada
'zvsoaoxa xouvzrxvo�o3x
doItidsma' Dads mxaoo 30mo TI'O&S4
�Zg•d at�9S %6i-TZ-73Q �'
oS �3nNefu � v � �• •• • — _ _
Z 0 tl
' SS�9T 56. SZ 73Q £Bd 95i
156 PO4 DEC 21 '95 16:52
DEC-21-19M 16:40 P.03iO3
for all"H"seats shall be fat two years.
•r Each board member*be subject to a two term limit
••Each board mcmber'sfetm would be staggered in the same manoes as their
antre�a�$nerd of Supervisor seat
r•The board membership Cannot serve on the Board of Supervisors;any city council,the
baud of the OgA or any other special district
•r 4he board members.would subject to FPPC gift and campaign disclosure and limits,
Advisory Hoards:
•• Fach special district would have an advisory board made up of am representative
from each of the dissolved districts.
Exemption Provision:
rr City residents could eaeatpt a local special district from the consolidation provisions if
the following criteria are met:
1.The district haset least 70%of it's boundaries within the city in question
2.The city's rasideam approve a sepVate ballot=as=authorizing the merger.
3.The city's eougcil votes to accfpt the spacial district
4.No LAFC0 approval would be required.
Vehicle:
A stew bill will be introduced on January 3.1995. 1 mguage will be available at that
time. —
a COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
January 17, 1995
n - 411
�ai9Bz2af�
Honorable Curt Pringle
Po.Boa Bf27 Speaker of the Assembly
F."ei2"12� State Assembly
.e<.a.cane.: State Capitol
foe44 Ewa Avenue Sacramento CA 95814
Foun ein V ey.CA
9z7aa7me
Dear Assemblyman Pringle:
Membe,' Pursuant to formal action by the governing Boards of Directors, the nine (9)
Agencies
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County are currently working to create
Mee a single Consolidated Sanitation District to serve the entire residential,
Anaheim commercial, and industrial populace of 2.2 million persons residing in 23
B.. cities in Orange County. Consolidation was identified as one of our critical
Buena Park goals for FY '96. We are following the LAFCO process and plan to submit
ide
rvuntan Valley our application in March, 1996. The feasibility study will be before our Joint
FuHantan
Beach Board for review in February. We expect our application to be through the
Huntington Beam ry P PP 9
thine LAFCO process by June '96—well ahead of the November, 1996 ballot.
Le Habra
La Palma
Las nAharmwa
Beach As you may know, we current) have nine districts with a joint administrative
Newport Beech Y Y Y
Orange organization. Our consolidation effort is intended to streamline governance
Placentia
Same Ana and save money. Some have asked why the wastewater treatment is not
Seal Beach county-wide. Our consolidated district will serve approximately 90 percent of
Stan=
r son the County residents. Wastewater treatment is based more on geography
Ylla Park and hydrology than on political subdivision. Our territory is generally
Yorba Croak Y 9Y P rY 9 Y tributary
county of orange to one or both of the Districts' two wastewater treatment plants. That means
that about 90 percent of the wastewater collected for treatment and disposal
;aAatary Disun4u does not have to be pumped to the sewerage treatment plants.
Cosy Mese
careen Croce The southern portion of Orange County is served by the Aliso Water
M'd'roy cry Management Agency (AWMA) and the South East Regional Reclamation
avatar Bietrocfw Authority (SERRA), two joint powers authorities which cover the two other
fhlne Bench major drainage courses, Aliso Creek and San Juan Creek. AWMA includes
agencies which are tributary to the Aliso Creek drainage area, and SERRA
covers those agencies generally tributary to San Juan Creek.
For these reasons, we believe that our effort to consolidate the nine districts
in our territory represents the most efficient, cost-effective way of proceeding.
A Public Wes[ewarar and Environmental Management Agency Committee to Protecting the Environment Since 1954
a'
r
Honorable Curt Pringle
Page 2
January 17, 1996
In addition to the Sanitation Districts' Consolidation, a consolidation study is
currently underway for the 18 water and wastewater agencies in the southern
part of the County. We would agree with your observations that there are
opportunities for consolidation and efficiency; however, major steps are
underway to achieve this.
The missions of water districts and sanitation districts are quite different. The
law, however, does provide for sanitation districts to assume both wastewater
treatment and landfill responsibilities. The Districts are looking at that option
now and may acquire the landfills from the County. If we were to do so, it
would be with the expectation of lowering operating costs through extensive
staff consolidation and privatization and thus lowering tipping fees. This
would be a major benefit to the rate-payers.
We would appreciate the opportunity to meet with you or your staff to discuss
our progress in the consolidation process.
Sin
ohn C. Cox, Jr.
oint Chair
JCC:DFM:cmc
JAWPDOCWMWFMW1188811
w
A"2 TNESANDIEOO UNION-TRIBUNE Sunday-,December 10, 199E
Neil Morgan
The `trial of the century' was about sewage
•blithe 7.1 rota by the City istrator for the EPA,had assured O'Connor that "The case was too big for city lawyers,"Hen-
Council eight years ago was a the federal government would pay a large part derson says."So I looked for a lawyer and found
blunder that almost cast San of San Diego's costs to meet EPA demands. the firm of Latham and Watkins.It intrigued
h' Diego taxpayers many billions of Members of O'Connor's busy task force took them.They took on the city,along with their
dollars.An unlikely alliance of time to read news stories by a Tribune reporter, partners nationwide,as a pro bona case.Nobody
citizens worked hard to undo Kathryn Balint,raising questions that were soon has ever said thanks to them.They did their
the damage,creating a land- debated within their meetings. hourly billing up to about$200,000 and left
mark case in the movement On May 29,1989,in a story that became part about 1990."
against federal overregulation, of her later nomination for a Penner Prize,she
One judge called it the"trial of the century," reported agreement among scientists at Scripps hat year Councilman Henderson,
and legal scholars rank it among the two or -Institution of Oceanography that EPA's second- entrenched in the case as gadfly,became
three most important cases in this city's history. ary treatment was useless. an intervenor representing himself.
Only money and sewage were at stake.But I don't think it's at all necessary."said the Then came a shadowy series of leg"Itsags.
for some of the principals in this case,it seemed eminent Roger Revelle,the former director of Seeking to settle the case before trial,the City
the most dynamic event bf their careers. SIO. Council appeared to capitulate.But it was buy-
At that meeting on Feb.17,1987,council ing time.It signed a decree agreeing to bring
members heard conflicting advice from City A hemist Edward Goldberg,whose the sewage treatment plant upto federal stand-
Manager John Lockwood and Mayor Maureen ■ _ work in protecting the ocean from pollu- cards by 2003 and to build water reclamation
O'Connor.The issue was whether San Diego YYY lion had won him the 1989 Tyler Prize in ands b Yet the$rem Club,which had a font
should continue to seek a waiver from the Envi- environmental science,was"strongly opposed" plansupported secondary treatment endorsed at dater
ronmental Protection Agency.The EPA was de- on"economic,scientific and social grounds'
mending that the city provide secondary treat- Marine scientist Jeffrey Frautschy,a former thriftier compromise to upgrade the existing
ment for city sewage before pumping it to the deputy director ofSlO,said,"It's a hell of a lot of treatment so as to re move 85 percent of solids.
ocean floor 2.5 miles off Point Loma.Many con. money to pay for nothing." Reversing itself.the City Council rated to reac.
sidered it a classic instance of Washington's All agreed that secondary treatment is neces. mate in decade-old application to the EPA for a
one-size-fits-an laws. scary to prevent choking fife Nbays,lakes and waiver.This time San Diego planned to appeal
"I can just ten you politically we are not going rivers.But the open sea can benefit from nutri- for help in Congress.
to get that waiver,"the mayor told council mem- ents in sewage treated only with the city'sad. But inexorably the EPA and its attorneys ad.
bers,"so 1 think we should quit beating our vanced primary process,which was eliminating vanced against renegade San Diego.
heads against the wall and start bringing in the 75 percent of solids.Soon the cost estimates of "The city cannot come through the hack
experts." EPA's demands jumped to$3 billion. door"an EPA attorney fumed,"and challenge
San Diego might not win a waiver.Lockwood Bruce Henderson,an attorney who repre- EPA."Fines for other cities departing from EPA
said,but keeping the waiver bid in force was our sented Revefle,says now that a major reason he standards were soaring into the millions.
only chance to delay or avoid being sued and ran for City Council in 1987 was the"irresponsi- The trial date was finally set before U.S.Dis.
fined for millions of dollars. binty"of that earlier 7-1 vote(the only"No- trict Judge Rudi Brewster,described by a col
The mayor carried the council vote,7-1. came from the late Bill Clearer).Henderson league as"a delightful maverick."Brewster now
brought the scientists'opinions forward with a estimates that EPA-city issues have since occc-
son G'Connor named seSan press conference on Scripps Pier. pied 94 court days and will continue to be heard
Diegans to a task force to study the Met- "People don't understand how much courage for years.
rupofitan Sewerage System,which serves it took for them to speak out,"Henderson says, Bromfield,the chief deputy city attorney,led
1.8 million people in 14 cities and in county sew. "especially the younger scientists whose grant
er districts.In the next three years,these 19 money could be cut off because they took on the the defense team into trial on Feb.S.1991.The
citizen members logged 20,000 hours of meet- federal government." first phase went on for 51 days.To some it was
ings. Henderson,who ran against City Attorney only a jumble of technical data,but everyone
But 16 months after the City Council vote, John Witt in a close and bitter election in 1992, knew the stakes were high.Under the law,San.
the EPA sued San Diego,as insiders expected, insists that Witt made it"unambiguously clear" Diego could be assessed fines of$229 million
insisting under the Clean Water Act that San that"under no circumstances was he going to and ordered to build a multibillion-dollar facility-.
Diego vutafl additional sewage treatment facili- can Revelle or any other scientist"as aw.,mesa (This is the/irst ofa tmo-part column.On
ties costingig
$1 billion or more.The reality was a in the EPA trial.But Wit[did assemble a legal Tuesday,a mavtnck federal judge talks back fq
shockformany San Diegans.After an,in 1971 team led by Chief Deputy Ted Bromfield.He Washington.)
the city had received a rare federal clean-water brought in scientists,including MiaJ.Tegner of
citation.And in 1987,Mayor O'Connor testified Scripps,who had made scores of research dives NEIL MORGAN'S column appears Sundays, I
under deposition,Judith Ayres,regional admin- in the kelp beds. Tuesdays and Thursdays.
t
TXESANDIEGO UNION-TRIBUNE Tuesday,December M 199
Neil Morgan
Quiet heroes and high drama in sewage case
(This is the second of hard columns about San of its ocean outfall;at 4.5 miles and 325 feet,the standing wart on San Diego's showplace aquas.
Diego's"trial of the century
.') pipes still make up the longest and deepest park.
In 1991 a maverick San Die- aeon outfall in the nation.With support from On the Political front.with notable early ass:
go judge helped make legal his- the Sierra Club,Brewster oversaw the city's tarce from Sen.Barbara Boxer and Rep.Bob
' tory in a 94-day lawsuit by the successful effort to upgrade its primary sewage Fcner,the city begins to tidy up is long battle
Environmental Protection treatment facility an remove 85 percent of sol- with the EPA.On Oct.31,1994,President Cl
Agency and saved San Diego ids, ton signed a bill allowing San Diego to reapply
taxpayers billions of dollars. He deferred a ruling on the city's out-of-court yet again for a waiver on sewage treatment.Ju
Justice Department lawyers agreement with the EPA,saying it might not be last month,the EPA amaunced anal approval
launched their use against ren. in San Diego's public interest Brewster was a five-year waiver.A House bill from Rep.Bria.
egade San Diego by insisting that U.S.District looking for clinching evidence,and a report on Bilbray would give the city a per—..anent exemp
Judge Rudi Brewster lacked the authority to ex- the dean pollution issue was expected from the Lion from secondary treatment.
cuse the city from building a sewage facility that National Research Council.Meanwhile,the his no wonder that some of the warriors in
could eventually cost San Diego taxpayers$10 judge gave San Diego until 2002 to seek a solu- this epic skirmish have invoked Shakespearean
billion. lion through Congress. eloquence.Bromfield.who led the San Diego
Expert EPA witnesses testified that small The NRC report came in the spring of 1993 use,chooses a line from"King Lear. The sets
changes occurring in the wean two miles oil and,to the apparent astonishment of EPA attor- ning team that spanned 1977-1995 has gone
Point Loma,where San Diego discharged its neys,it supported San Diego's contention that from waiver to court to waiver.'The wheel is
sewage,were so damaging that additional sec- secondary treatment was unnecessary. come full circle.'"
ondary treatment wasrequired.Brewster fre- Brewster prefers to let his opinions speak for
quently interrogated witnesses and challenged hen Brewster spun out a Machiavel- him,From an inch-high suck comes this Bour-
attorneys.He repeatedly asked:Does it harm lian scheme.First,he gave the city a ish:
the environment?The answer came:Change, spanking,saying that failed political lead- 'The Court concludes from undisputed evi-
but not necessarily harm. ership at City Hall had led to neglect of Maine- dence that the expected slight change in the
"He poked and prodded all the lawyers,"re- nonce and an"outrageous record"of sewage ouuca0 environment will be benefrial to the ber
calls Chief Deputy Ted Bromfield,who led the spills—3,701 of them in eight years.In the bil- Lhic(ocean floor)community,not harmful.The
city's defense."He even had me bring in special lion-dollar misunderstanding about dun po0u- new discharge will muse a flouris:ungof organ-
witnesses toexplain the couplings on sewer tion,he ruled that Sin Diego's outfall was uus- isms in the barren environment surrounding th
pipes." ing no harm to ocean life,but that there was new outfa0 because of the presence of addition:
In a long-awaited moment,the towering potential harm to swimmers and divers in the food lot the organisms....The Court finds the
oceanographer Roger Revelle,already knighted kelp beds.He fined San Diego$3 million,with San Diego dean outfall discharge environment
as a"Mr.San Diego,"gave one of his more sono- $500,000 to be paid immediately to the EPA. is improving."
rous performances.The Pacific Ocean would He could not tell San Diego City Council what After eight dogged years of sewage field trip
"welcome"San Diego's sewage discharge,he to do.But by now he was schooled in the finesse out to sea,across the cowry and as far as Taco
testified.Six colleagues were equally convinc- of city politics.Like a gambler holding four aces. -a,Wash.,Brewster now allows himself one
ing.In their press seats Kathryn Balint and he suggested a voluntary plan with even wider burst of satisfaction.
others,who had seen San Diego as a David pit- environmental implications than the EPA had
ted against Goliath,began to sense an upset. sought if council were to pass a waterconser- " his sewage ease is the most ex-
vation ordinance by year's end he would give rating case I've ever heard:he says.
the city$500,000-a-year credit until...fine "Good lawyers.real issues,a case tha
rewster discovered that every- was paid.He proposed that city dispense makes a difference for millions of people.I kep:
where he went,someone wanted to talk this money in S100 rebates to property owners telling lawyers that we were all on the same
abeutsewage.The attorney Miles Har- who replace their toilets and shower heads with side.fording the best way to help the envdron-
vey,who had chaired Mayor Maureen O'Con- appliances using low water volume. menu and help people.It isn't over yet,but it's
not s task farce,wrote Brewster that he be- City Council soon passed such an ordinance. going to be the happiest ending I ever hnaginec
' fieved San Diego could be spared the billions for In its continuing reports to judge Brewster the The city is upgrading its entire sewerage sys.
secondary treatment if it extended its outfall to city cites rebates far in excess of S500,000 a tem.In three or four more years sewage spills
four miles offshore,well beyond the Paint Loma year.Water consumption declined,and so did will become unusual events."
kelp beds frequented by fishermen and divers. sewage flow.In fact,San Diego is paying its fine The judge chortles about the most recent fli;
The judge pursued the theme that if San Die- to San Diego taxpayers instead of to Washing- flop in the case.The State of California had
go's sewage war causing no harm there was no ton bureaucrats,and the entire metropolitan joined the EPA in suing San Diego.But the scat
way to justify public spending.Brewster was sewerage system is receiving overdue repair has asked to be legally"realigned'in future
' now estimating that$10 billion,including debt and expansion.Trunk fines built 50 years ago hearings.Hereafter California will be on the
service,could be the final cost. are being replaced,pump stations upgraded and side of San Diego.
As the fast phase of trial ended the judge de- rebuilt to avoid spills,and a sludge plant is rising
' layed his decision until San Diego could com- near Miramar.It will treat sludge now being NEIL MORGAN'S column appears Tuesdays,
pkle,in November 1993.a 2.5-mile extension piped to Fiesta Island in Mission Bay,a long- Thursdays and Sundays.
T®I)AY'S BRIEFINCA
ASSIGNMENT OF INVENTIONS, PATENTS,
AND OTHER PERSONAL PROPERTY RIGHTS
I, (hereinafter referred to as"Employee") agree that all processes,
inventions, patents, copyrights, trademarks, and other intangible rights that may be
conceived or developed by Employee, either alone or with others, during the term of
Employee's employment, whether or not conceived or developed during Employee's
working hours, and with respect to which the equipment, supplies, facilities, or trade secret
information of Districts was used, or that relate at the time of conception or reduction to
practice of the invention to the business of the Districts or to Districts' actual or
demonstrably anticipated research and development, or that result from any work
performed by Employee for Districts, shall be the sole property of Districts. Employee shall
disclose to Districts all inventions conceived during the term of employment, whether or not
the property of Districts under the terms of the preceding sentence, provided that such
disclosure shall be received by Districts in confidence. Employee shall execute all
documents, including patent applications and assignments, required by Districts to
establish Districts' rights under this agreement. This agreement does not apply to any
invention that qualifies fully under the provisions of§2870 of the California Labor Code.
Dated:
CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION REVISION COMMISSION
NOVEMBER.DECEMBER 1995 AND JANUARY 1996 �Isooi KSTREET.SUM I740
William Hauck,Chair A Wessage 3rom the Chairman .�J
Donald Benninghoven,
Vice chair Following 20 months of meetings, hearings, workshops,
George Babikian and several volumes of correspondence, the
Anne Bakar Commission will enter its final phase in 1996 by
Andrew Baron completing its recommendations to the Governor and
Legislature. More than 200 people testified at the
Elizabeth Cabraser Commission's hearings, over 200 attended the video
Patricia Castillo conferences, and more than 1 ,500 participated in a
Betty Tom Chu community forums co-sponsored with the League of
Lewis Coleman Women Voters of California. The Commission also
received comments via the Internet. We appreciate all of
Russell Gould the thoughtful comments we received.
Kamala Harris
Alan Heslop In February, the Commission will finalize its
recommendations for submission to the Governor and
Elizabeth Hill Legislature. The recommendations will be drafted into
Hon. Phillip Isenberg legal language, and the Legislature will determine the
Hon. Lucy Killea process that will be used to decide what will go on the
ballot in November 1996. Additionally, the Commission
Hon.Bill Leonard will submit a report explaining the background and
Jane Pisano reasons for its final recommendations. You are welcome
Choi Tsang to request copies of any of the documents produced by
judge Roger wane„ the Commission. A summary of the Commissions final
recommendations will be published in our March
Leon Williams newsletter.
In order for any of the recommendations to be placed on
the November ballot, both houses of the legislature must
approve them by a two-thirds vote (54 in the Assembly
Fred Silva and 27 in the Senate).
Executive Secretary
Ellen Moretti Bill Hauck
Deputy Executive Secretary Chairman
DeDe Und
Executive Assistant
PAGE 2 NOVEMBER. DECEMBER 1995 AND JANUARY 1996
3
NOTICE OF 1996 MEETINGS
January 1996
Discussion of Preliminary Recommendations
Friday, January 12
9:00 a.m. to 5:00 P.M.
1201 K Street
Seventh Floor Meeting Room
Sacramento
Symposium On A Single House Legislature
Thursday, January 18
9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
Friday, January 19
9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.
6000 J Street
Residents Hall Complex
California State University, Sacramento
Sacramento
♦ 04*
February 1996
Discussion and Action on Final Recommendations
Monday, February 5
9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
Tuesday, February 6
9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.
1201 K Street
Chamber of Commerce Meeting Room
12th Floor
Sacramento
CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION REVISION COMMISSION
` PAGE 3 NOVEMBE . DECEMBER i995 AND JANUARY 1996
SUMMARY OF CCRC PUBLIC HEARINGS
Over the past three months, the Commission held a as a fundamental interest, concerns were raised by the
series of public hearings to solicit feedback on its community colleges over not being included as a part of
preliminary recommendations. In addition to the four the fundamental interest and the modifications to the
public hearings, the Commission -with the assistance Proposition 98 funding formula. Some witnesses
of the League of Women Voters and Pacific Bell-held a argued for retaining the State Superintendent as an
series of four video teleconferences. elected official, while others argued for the
The public hearings and video teleconferences were Commission's recommendation to make it appointive.
designed to give interested parties the ability to A number of witnesses expressed concern
prowde input on the Commission's preliminary over the consequences of eliminating the constitutional
recommendations. Additionally,the Commission status of county offices of education and county
received many written comments and suggestions both superintendents, and leaving these issues to statute
by mail and over the Intemet. The following is a brief instead.
summary of the testimony received by the
Commission. Most witnesses supported the Commission's
proposal to allow local governments to raise additional
issues Of Concern sales or property tax revenues to supplement the
State's per pupil block grant. Some argued that the
State Governance proposal should allow for a majority vote- rather than
two-thirds-to raise local property taxes. Others,
Structure: In general, the Commission received however, opposed allowing any increase in the
praise for its work in this area. However, some property tax at all.
concerns were expressed about the Commission's
proposals to make the legislature a one-house body
and to reduce the number of elective statewide offices. State/Local Relationship
Some witnesses continued to express an interest in Some representatives of local government supported
changing the State's"winner take all"election system the Commission's recommendation to repeal certain
to a system of proportional representation. Still others exemptions(pre-1975 mandates, crimes& infractions)
expressed concems about various proposals that to the Constitution's mandate reimbursement
would provide more flexibility for elected officials to requirements; others, however, argued that the
revise initiatives both before and after submission to Commission's proposal was not practical because it
the voters. would create a huge hole in the State budget. Critics of
operations., The Commission heard testimony from the Commission's approach argued that ACA 8
representatives of public employees that the (Goldsmith) offers a better approach to the issue of
contracting for services recommendation would be mate-mandatedndate reimbursement
local programs by revising the current
harmful to public employees,and that standards must mandate reimbursement requirement.
be part of any proposal that would expand the State's
ability to contract for services. They also argued that Local Government Structure, Finance, and
the state would experience little, if any,cost savings. Polders
State Budget and Fiscal System The Commission's proposal to allow local governments
Most witnesses were supportive of the Commission's to adopt"community charters" received much attention.
recommendations which are designed to enhance the Many witnesses were supportive of the concept, but
state's fiscal integrity. However, some did express argued that the Commission needs to provide more
concern about the proposals to lower the vote details as to how the community charter process would
threshold from two-thirds to majority on the budget bill work. For example,witnesses requested more
and to allow the enactment of a multi-subject budget information on how the proceedings would be initiated,
implementation bill. Others, however, agreed that what powers would be involved, what are the goals of
these changes would in fact help get the budget a community charter,etc.
approved and enacted on-time.
Representatives of special districts expressed
K-12 Education Structure, Powers, and concern over the potential impact of community charters
Finance on their continued existence.
While the Commission received praise for its
recommendation to explicitly recognize K-12 education
CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION REVISION COMMISSION
�FH;�i� `
u 2 •- / U.S.POSTACF
CAUFORNIA CONSTITUTION REVISION COMMISSIONN 8N'tl'BO p • y a ; 0-3 2 4
21R A1201 K STREL 1.SURE 1740 SACRAMENTO.CA 95814 (916)322-4121 FAa
DONALD KINTYRE
ORANGE COUNTY
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 9272E-81E7
This monthly publication contains Information regarding the California Constitution Revision Commission and Its activities and provides public meeting notice
as required under Government Code Section 11125.
m�mm
1Z/14/95 16:44:40 -> 714962M56 Donald McIntyre Page 801
F DEC-14-95 THU 15:42 P. 01
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION o/ SANITATION AGENCIES
S ML.S x,&iW1400 S"ven,e"m,oAas814 T'EL;(916)446,Oa69—FAX(910)44"808
Y �a
DATE: December 14, 1995
TO: CASA Member Agencies
FROM: Mikc Dillon & Bobbi Larson
SUBJECT: SPECIAL DISTRICTS WEIGH TN ON THE CONSTITLMON REVISION
COMMISSION'S COMMUNITY CHARTER PROPOSAL
CASA participate( in two hearings last week regarding the California Constitution Revision
Commission's (CCRC) community charter proposal
ASSEMBLY LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE HEARING
On Tuesday, December 5, 1995, the Asaxmbly Local Government Committee held an interim
hearing to consider the local government piece of the CCRC recommendations. Commission
Chair Bill Hauck presented an overview of the Commission's objectives, stating that the
existence of 7,000 units of local government is "on its face' too many governments. Hauck
stated that the CCRC is seeking to move government closer to the people, to make
government more efficient, visible and accountable.
Following the overview, the Committee heard testimony from 15 witnesses, including CASA
Presideut, Tom Woodruff, and Executive Director, Mike Dillon. CASA's testimony stressed
the need to distinguish independent special districts from dependent districts, which are
essentially creatures of cities and counties. President Woodruff also noted that the lack of
detail in the CCRC's bare bones charter proposal made it difficult to evaluate. The
California Special Districts Association and the Association of California Water Agencies also
testified, stressing the need to establish objective criteria for providing services and then
measuring all local government agencies against those criteria. A common theme among
those testifying was that special districts are not afraid of competition, and the "best agency
to provide a particular service may just be a special district. Let's not make a prejudgment
that a city or county is a better service provider."
The representative of CALAFCO stated that since passage of AB 1335, the focus has been on
special district consolidations but that there are many cities which should also be
consolidated. Finally, the lobbyist for the California Association of Realtors urged the
committee not to support the charter proposal if it would mean creating a "larger, more
remote bureaucracy that we can't access." He warned against radical change, suggesting that
incremental changes may be preferable.
12/14/95 16:45:20 -> 7149fiZOMS Donald McIntyre Page HE
DEC-14-95 THU 15:43 P' C-- -v
Throughout the hearing. several Committee members, including Marilyn Brewer (R-Newport
Beach) and Tom Hannigan (D-Fairfidd), indicated their agreement that California has too
much government and that there is a need for consolidation. Assemblymember Mike
Sweeney (D-Hayward) expressed concern that implementing the charter might force smaller
cities to go along with realignment against their objections, and that most people think cities
work pretty well; the area that needs restructuring is county govanmenL Assemblymember
Steve $uykendall (R-Rancho Palos Verdes) suggested that maybe water and wastewater
districts should be exempt from the charter proposal because they provide a distinct service
along watershed lines rather than political boundaries.
The purpose of the hearing was informational; the Committee took no action, The
Committee will hold additional hearings once the CCRC introduces its proposed
constitutional amendments in February.
CONSTITUTION REVISION COMMISSION -SACRAMENTO REGIONAL HEARING
On Thursday, December 7, the Constitution Revision Commission met in Sacramento for
the last in a series of four regional hearings. The heavy agenda included a special appearance
by Lieutenant Governor, Gray Davis, and State Superintendent of Public Instruction,
Delaine Eastin, who, along with other special interest groups, appealed to the Commission
for reconsideration of several of their preliminary recommendations.
The morning session began with the testimony of five special district representatives. Their
testimony had been prepared by the lobbyists for the various special district organizations,
during weekly strategy meetings in Sacramento. Representing CASA, ACWA and CSDA
was Michael Glaze, General Manager of the Oroville-Wyandotte Irrigation District, and a
Board Member of the Lake Oroville Public Utility District Glaze provided excellent
testimony on behalf of the special districts and was very effective in detailing issues that must
be discussed prior to any consolidation, such as: water rights, debt financing, SWRCB
regulated wastewater permits, labor negotiations, rate equities between merging entities, and
complementary infrastructure quality. Others testifying encouraged the Commission to not
make the "quantum leap to assume that someone can [provide services] better than special
districts." The specific recommendations by the panel dealt not so much with opposition to
the community charter concept, but rather with the process involved in the shaping of the
charter: 1) How is the vote weighted? 2) Are special districts at a disadvantage? and, 3) There
should be some principles guiding the process. At the conclusion of the segment,
Commissioner Andy Baron complimented the group, stating that the special districts had
clearly taken "a more constructive and positive approach to this process, and we need to make
sure they are included as we are moving this through."
The California Business Roundtable representative, Gary Hunt, offered his group's
recommendations to the Commission, which included: 1) The state should review the
responsibility and service of special districts and make recommendations accordingly
regarding the consolidation of special districts, and 2) The establishment of Constitution
2
1Z/14/95 16:46:84 -> 714967%156 Donald McIntyre Page 003
DEC-14-95 THH 15;44 P. 03
Revision Commission II, which would deal specifically with the reform issues of special
districts and school districts. The call for CCRC U's development, Hunt said, was because
"these are immensely complex issues that need to be revisited" Assemblyman Ruykendafl,
who was sitting in on the deliberations, echoed Hones claim by calling the local charter
issues "the murkiest" the Commission has come up with,and further expressed his
reservations about supporting such a concept unless more work was done. Similarly, the
president of the League of Women Voters testified that the "charter concept is still too
indefinite for us to support now."
Chairman Bill Hauck noted that on January 11, the CCRC would meet again to discuss a list
of those items that are still unresolved, and said that he hoped to have a Legislative Counsel
rough draft to review at a meeting of the CCRC on February 5-6. The Commission is
already several months behind schedule. If legislation is not formally introduced until late
February or early March, little time will be available for legislative hearings and debate.
Whereas routine legislation can be acted upon until the end of session, September 1, 1996, the
CCRC's constitutional amendment will have to pass through the appropriate legislative
channels, by the Secretary of States deadline of late June for receipt of a constitutional
amendment to appear on the November ballot.
3
a
` DONADD N,CINTY&
2150
January 9, 1996 e
MEMORANDUM
TO: All District Employees
m FROM: Linda Eisary "
Training Manager
SUBJECT: Tuition Assistance Policy and Procedure
The attached Tuition Assistance Policy and Procedure has been approved by the
Executive Management Team for District wide implementation effective immediately.
Employees wishing to participate in this program must complete the attached
Application for Tuition Assistance Form following the procedures outlined in the
policy. Additional application forms may be obtained from the Training Division of the
Human Resources Department.
The Training Division is currently developing a separate funding policy for job
certification training to be implemented in February.
LE:dm
gAwpXhMrsmIX I Uu8ion.mem
CSDOC 0 P.O. Box 8127 0 Founpm Valley,CA 92728-81270 (714)962-2411
TUITION ASSISTANCE POLICY AND PROCEDURE
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
A. PURPOSE
To encourage self development, the Districts will provide employees with financial
assistance for educational courses that are consistent with individual career goals
and Districts' objectives.
B. SCOPE
All regular employees.
C. POLICY
The Districts will reimburse employees who successfully complete academic education
courses that are directly job related and serve the goals and mission of the Districts, and
consistent with the authorized training budget of the employee's work unit.
D. PROCEDURES FOR ENROLLMENT
1. Employees who want to enroll in education courses (either after-hours or in
accordance with a flexed work schedule) should discuss their educational goals with
their supervisor. The Training Manager can provide further guidance if needed.
Employees may submit applications for the following:
(1) Non-degree education courses and programs;
(2) Associate, Baccalaureate and Graduate degree programs.
2. Reimbursement will be at the discretion of the Districts provided the employee meets
the criteria outlined below:
(a) An application for approval of a course or program, or a program change,
must be submitted; using the Application for Tuition Reimbursement
Program Form, through an employee's supervisor(s) to the Department
Head for final approval prior to the beginning of such a course or
program. The supervisor will recommend the request for approval or
disapproval to.his or.ber.Department.Head.no less than 15 days prior to
the employee registering for the course.
(b) Once approved by the Department Head, the application must be forwarded
prior to class start date to the Training Manager for signature to ensure
policy compliance and consistency among departments in policy
implementation.
(c) On successful completion of each prior approved course with a grade of
"C" (70%) or better, the Districts will reimburse the employee the cost of
tuition and required fees for schools within the University of California
System or up to equivalent costs (i.e. for private schools, employee pays
the difference). Continued on other side
The Tuition Assistance Program, subject to advance authoriiation, will also
reimburse participants for required book costs, and any applicable lab and
material fees upon successful completion of each approved course (receipts
must be provided). Travel, parking, personal supplies and/or non-related
materials, equipment or other similar expenses will not be reimbursed.
(d) The employee will complete an Authorization for Reimbursement of
Education Courses Form and submit it to the Training Manager along with
the following official documents: -
(1.) Record of final grade;
(2.) Receipt for tuition and fees paid;
(3.) Receipts for books, lab fees, material fees; and
(4.) Degree awarded, if applicable.
3. The Training Manager will review the Authorization for Reimbursement of Education
Courses Form to ensure appropriate documentation and forward it to the Finance
Department for payment to the employee. The Training Department will retain a
copy for to employee's training record.
4. Employees who receive payments for formal course work at an accredited college or
university through to Tuition Assistance Program will be required to reimburse the
Districts if the employee voluntarily leaves Districts employment within one year of
completing said course work. The repayment requirement may be waived by the
General Manager under unusual circumstances on an individual case basis. The total
amount of the reimbursement will be prorated and forgiven on the basis of 25% per
each six months of completed employment (each completed 180 calendar days).
January 5, 1 M
APPLICATION FOR TUITION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
Nmne W Emp'gr Prom pnmepl Np.ne.
FulkTme ❑ Pan-Tone ❑ Deg"Program ❑
Pmmm
8 Pan-Tme,Number of hours pery eek
REQUEST FOR COURSE APPROVAL
School to be Amended
and Location:
Do you expects receive any other type of trillion assistance? No ❑ Yes❑ d yes,amount of aid
Counts unhs Tulrsm Date
Number Course This or and
Credits Required Fees From To
Expected Data of Graduation: Degree Sought and Major Fold:
Reason for taking murrul
I understandrommumamentis conditional upon satisfactory course completion.
Enpxh .S� one
APPROVAL FOR EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE.- . . -
❑ Training is job related/ Signed Date
mission essential pig ve+enusv�emew
❑ Approval does not exceed Signed _ ,Date
departmental training budget tp nmmw haxi
Signed Date
uemw N®roa
APPLICATION FOR REIMBURSEMENT Date
Attached are grace sheets,cancelled checks andlor receipts for the mutse(s)approved above.
I request mimbumement in the amount of S
&,k,,se 9ymee
TO: FINANCE DEPARTMENT Approved for payment of
Signed
1re�v awnr oar
NOTE This form must De wbmdfed for approval prior to Start of mum. Rev. 1&98
(n
H
_U
OC �
Cf)
~ H
z
Z O
O .0
w
- F. C�
cn O
O
U
Options
fi 3^ .Y�.i t` 061.' W.4!S 1^li1@9NP 91
• Status quo: continued operation by County
• Form new county-wide sanitation district
• Form one (or more) Joint Powers Authority
• Private ownership
• Out-of-county alternatives
�a
P_.
Philosophy and Approach
• Partnership and equity among participants
• Entrepreneurial
• Customer-driven
• Competitive rates
• Reliable and safe system
• Trust in the concept
Governance Issues
• Broad-based governing board
• Determine our own fate
• Sensitivity to specific needs
• Input during transition phase,
long-term planning
e
Competitive Rates
mcacsmsma�.�amnmimnmmvas _ a . mwm
• Flow control of waste stream
• Aggressive operational strategies
• Major regional force in the marketplace
Reliable System
• Long-term access to service
• Environmental and public health
stewardship
• Revenue, reserves, staff, consultants
Indemnification and Liability
• Protection for individual cities
• Reserves and insurance
• Technical planning and mitigation
• Unified legal strategy
Bankruptcy
• County has obligated itself to using
$15 million per year from solid-waste
system
• Bankruptcy solution is valuable to cities
• Sale of the landfills can ensure revenue
from solid-waste system
Challenges and Risks for the Future
• Long-term and reliable refuse disposal for our citizens
• Control costs
• Protect groundwater and other resources
from the effects of 21 closed and 4 open landfills
• Protect the interests of the "host" cities
• Maintain a competitive market among waste haulers
• Develop financial, technical and legal ability to
address liabilities county-wide
What's Ahead
January 24 Sanitation Districts drafts term sheet for acquisition
February 14 Sanitation Districts adopts term sheet for acquisition
February 27 Board of Supervisors considers term sheet
February - March Cities adopt disposal agreements with Sanitation Districts
March LAFCO application finalized
June County and Sanitation Districts resolve final terms
June LAFCO approves new sanitation district
July 1 Formation of new sanitation district
July 1 Final agreement between County and new sanitation district.
July - September Transition period
October 1 Full control of operation by new sanitation district
COUNTY SANITATION Disk
d OMNGE CDUN . CALIFORNIA
' tOB�a tLLb OVEMIE
eo so.¢rxo
rouxr�v.vuur.r�rr�e xxnae
nW x6x-Nn
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
DISPOSAL COMMITMENT AGREEMENT
The creation of a County Sanitation District 99, with its mission to continue
providing in-County waste disposal options, will change the nature of the Cities' and
Sanitary Districts' relationship to the regional landfill system by giving these entities the
effective ownership and control of the system. Accordingly, the Disposal Commitment
Agreement memorializes in writing the obligation the agencies will assume with their
participation in the newly formed District 99, namely. the support of the regional landfill
system through a commitment to deliver a continuous waste stream.
The Disposal Commitment Agreement does not construct a detailed contractual
relationship between the parties principally because each agency being a part of the
governance of District 99 should make such details unnecessary. The District will
consider the policies and procedures that will govern the District's relationships to its
member agencies, as well as the rules and regulations that will control the actual
operation of the District It the future, the District may, with its agency participants,
choose additional contractual mechanisms to achieve the goals of the District as they
are defined and developed.
The proposed Agreement implements the critical first step in the formation of
District 99 by evidencing the binding promise of the agencies to deliver 100% of the
non-recyclable municipal solid waste generated within their jurisdictions to the regional
landfills. Of course, the interest of each of the agencies and their haulers in recycling
programs and revenue from recyclable materials is protected, along with the rights of
individuals to setf-haul their waste to any destination. An additional promise from the
agencies is their pledge of full cooperation in making the actual delivery of trash to the
landfills a reality through franchisee agreement amendments and other means if
necessary.
District 99's responsibility to provide reliable long-term disposal capacity to the
users of the regional landfill system is set forth in the Agreement The agency, as a
member of District 99's governing board, will participate in decisions made
on key administrative issues such as the mechanisms necessary to insure the collection
of the tipping fees from the haulers or the most effective approach to monitoring
compliance with the waste disposal commitments. An important element in support of
the District 99's efforts will be the agencies obligations under the Agreement to utilize
the power and authority of municipal governance to supplement where appropriate, the
District's statutory ability to regulate.
The new District, through Ps inclusive Board of Directors, will present an open
forum for the building of consensus positions among the agencies on important topics
].
COUNTY SANITATIDN DISTRIC
AI DUNGE COUNTY, CALIFONNIA-
11 EUIS AWNVE 1
OA 80.6127
WNIIIN VALLE1.2yL,ipllNlp B2Ti&B1
p1u252. .11
including:
Revenue collection, whether through tipping fees or otherwise,
Operating and capital improvement planning,
The scope of general and environmental indemnification,
The equitable distribution of resources for programs such as
household hazardous waste disposal,
The protection of the landfills from unauthorized hazardous waste
disposal,
Advisory positions on franchise agreements and local flow
enforcement programs,
Positions on the defense of any local City faced with a challenge to
its franchising authority,
Matters related to the compliance by haulers with the operating
rules, regulations and guidelines of the District,
Data management and other methods available to support Cities in
meeting their recycling and landfill diversion requirements,
The opportunities available to offer the system's customers
designated disposal locations,
Matters related to trash importation, and
Mechanisms to provide for dispute resolution between parties,
among other issues.
It is the position of District No. 1 that each of these issues is better resolved and
determined through the governance structure, authority and action of District 99, rather
than by attempting to negotiate a highly detailed and complex agreement of terms and
conditions applicable to 33 individual agencies.
EOT Stay
uss+ontt
Omly '
1 DRAFT
1/10/96
2
AGREEMENT RE SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL COMMITMENT
3
4 This Agreement is entered into by and between County Sanitation District No. 1 of
5 Orange County for itself and as agent for County Sanitaton Districts No. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13,
6 and 14, and in its capacity as a lead agency for the initiation of proceedings to authorize the
7 formation of a new County Sanitation District formed under the provisions of the County
8 Sanitation District Act, upon formation to be known as County Sanitation District No. 99
9 ("District 99') and the City of ("City") and is effective this_ day of
10 1996 (the "Effective Date").
11 Whereas, District 99 will be formed by the action of the Board of Supervisors of
12 Orange County for the purpose of accepting the ownership, operation and control of
13 numerous landfills and other solid waste disposal facilities and services previously owned,
14 operated and made available for public use by the County of Orange (the "System"), and
15 Whereas, pursuant to the statutory charter of District 99, the City will be represented
16 on the governing board of District 99, and
17 Whereas, it is a matter of County-wide concern that the System continue to be
18 operated and maintained in a manner that meets the requirements of State and Federal law,
19 and
20 Whereas, the Citys participation in District 99 will assure that the System continues
21 to be publicly owned, customer oriented, environmentally sound and capable of providing a
22 cost competitive tip fee that is sensitive to the market rate in the waste disposal industry,
23 Whereas, the City has the authority pursuant to its general police powers and under
i
24 the California Integrated/Waste Management Act to determine aspects of solid waste
25 handling which are of local concern, including the extent of solid waste handling services
26 within the City and whether the same shall be conducted under franchise, agreement,
27 license, permit or otherwise, and
28
. AT
I Whereas, District 99 and the City have determined that the public health, safety and
2 welfare of the residents of the City and throughout the County will be served best by the
3 support of the System through (i) the commitment of District 99 to provide predictable and
4 reliable long-tern disposal capacity to the member cities and agencies
5 of District 99, and (ii) the commitment of the City to cause the delivery of municipal solid
6 waste generated within its jurisdiction to the System in accordance with the terms of this
7 Agreement,
8 Now, therefore, in consideration of the benefits and obligations accruing to each, the
9 parties agree as follows:
10 DEFINITIONS
11 The capitalized terms used in this Agreement shall have the meanings stated in either
12 the Recitals above, or as set forth below.
13 "Solid Waste"shall mean garbage, refuse, waste and other materials acceptable for
14 disposal at Class III landfills pursuant to applicable laws and regulations, excepting only
15 recyclable materials, self-hauled wastes and solid waste generated by state or federal
16 governmental agencies unless the City has exercised control over such waste and chooses
17 to directly deliver to the Facilities. The term "Solid Waste" shall also include waste residue
18 that is not diverted to useful purpose as a result of"recycling" as defined in Public Resources
19 Code Section 40180.
20 "Facilities"shall mean the Class III landfills located within the County of Orange and
21 other waste disposal facilities and services owned by District 99 for the handling of municipal
22 solid waste.
23 DISPOSAL COMMITMENT
24 To the extent allowed by law, City agrees to cause the delivery to the Facilities of
25 100% of the Solid Waste generated within its jurisdiction and collected from residential,
26 commercial, industrial or other sources. City agrees to carry out its disposal commitment
27 utilizing all means available to it under the law, including but not limited to exercising its rights
28 under current agreements, franchises, permits or licenses with solid waste haulers to direct
nowxLwt)"a
•6VYIY p
♦TOCRYS/.L WV Zit
ow.rc 23070 t -2 -
1 that Solid Waste be delivered to the Facilities. As of the date of execution of this Agreement,
2 if City does not have the right under its current-contracts, permits or licenses to direct the
3 disposal of Solid Waste, then City shall at the earliest practicable time amend, revoke or
4 revise its agreements, franchises, permits or licenses to effect such change as will allow City
5 to meet its disposal commitment.
6 To the extent that City or its waste hauler utilizes a transfer station prior to the point
7 of final disposal, and Solid Waste is commingled through processing at the transfer station,
8 then the City shall implement the disposal commitment in accordance with this Agreement
9 by directing that the tonnage equivalent of City's Solid Waste shall be delivered from the
10 transfer station to the Facilities.
11 In the event that any change in State or Federal law or the decision of any court of
12 competent jurisdiction restricts the ability of the City to act in accordance with this Agreement,
13 then the City agrees to cooperate with District 99 in determining the best available options
14 for meeting the disposal commitment, and the City agrees to exercise its best efforts to
15 implement such options.
16 SYSTEM OPERATION
17 District 99 agrees to operate and maintain the Facilities in a manner that provides
18 reliable long-term disposal capacity to the City and the other member cities and entities of
19 District 99.
20 District 99 shall adopt policies for the management and operation of the System that
21 promote sound environmental management, economic efficiency, public service and the
22 equitable distribution of resources. District 99 shall adopt rules, regulations and guidelines,
23 whether by resolution, ordinance or otherwise, governing the System and the use of the
24 Facilities. District 99's governing board will consider and address all administrative matters,
25 including but not limited to the tip fee and the collection thereof, the manner of monitoring and
26 enforcement of the disposal commitment, recommendations regarding franchise agreements
27 and the scope and extent of household hazardous waste programs.
28
P011AV. NOOPM
•6PMpLp
�nawty�t�, Rtt
= 1
zw70
o...oE ro_� - 3 -
i
I The City shall have the opportunity to participate in the actions and decision making
2 of District 99 as a member of District 99's governing board, and the City agrees to support
3 the adopted policies, rules, regulations, guidelines and decisions of District 99. If necessary
4 to achieve the measures approved by District 99, the City agrees to use its power and
5 authority of municipal governance to supplement District 99's statutory authority to enact
6 ordinances and adopt resolutions governing solid waste matters.
7 LIABILITY
8 District 99 shall be a separate legal entity formed in accordance with the requirements
9 of California law, and neither City nor any other member entity shall, solely by virtue of being
10 a member on the governing board of District 99, incur liability by reason of any lawsuit or
11 other action, and none of the debts, obligations or liabilities of District 99 shall be the debts,
12 obligations or liabilities of City or its general fund.
13 District 99 shall protect, defend, indemnify and hold harmless City in each and every
14 respect from any loss, damage, expense or liability, including reasonable attomeys' fees, if
15 the same is incurred or may be incurred by City by reason of any action, administrative or
16 otherwise, or the levy of any fine or civil penalty by any administrative agency under State or
17 Federal law, where the same arises out of the operation, management or control by District
18 99 of the Facilities or System. This indemnification in favor of the City and as against District
19 99 is effective for any occurrence related to the Facilities or the System, and the City's right
20 to indemnification hereunder shall include District 99's obligation to defend City, upon receipt
21 by District 99 of notification of claim and request for defense, from and against any and all
22 liabilities, claims, penalties, forfeitures, suits, costs, and expenses incident hereto (including
23 reasonable attorneys fees), which City may incur, become responsible for, or pay as a result
24 of the death or bodily injury to any person, and/or the destruction or damage to any property,
25 contamination of, or other adverse effect on the environment, including costs of response to
26 and/or penalties for violation of laws, regulations or orders, resulting from or due to the
27 release of hazardous substances; provided, however, that the above indemnification shall not
28 be provided to City where the act, omission to act or event that is the subject matter of the
mvux amevun
.vrwmn
nrmAerea .,. 200t
2
30
70 1 ] -4 -
1 indemnification is the result of the gross negligence, or willful or intentional misconduct of the
2 City.
3 TERM
4 This Agreement shall be in full force and effect and legally binding on the parties
5 hereto from the Effective Date and until the earlier of the date _calendar years from the
6 Effective Date or the date of dissolution of the District.
7 MISCELLANEOUS
8 City acknowledges that District No. 1 is authorized to enter into this agreement but that
9 upon completion of the formation of District No. 99, District No. 1 will not exercise any legally
10 authorized powers relating to solid waste disposal nor any powers or rights set forth in this
11 Agreement, nor shall District No. 1 be otherwise responsible for meeting the obligations of
12 this Agreement. District No. 1 shall assign this agreement and all rights, duties and
13 obligations hereunder to District No. 99, to be effective immediately upon the formation of
14 District 99. City agrees that the provisions contained herein relating to liability and
15 indemnification shall apply solely to District 99 and shall not be binding upon District No. 1.
16 This Agreement may be executed in counterparts and the provisions hereof shall be
17 governed by California law. This Agreement may be modified by the mutual agreement of
18 the parties reduced to writing and signed by both parties.
19 IT IS AGREED, this_day of. 1996 by the City Council of the City of
20 by the following vote:
21
AYES:
22
NOES:
23
24 Authorized Representative
City of
25 ATTEST:
26
City Clerk
27
ACCEPTED AND AGREED:
28 District's Authorized Representative
aow¢aoouwr
z000aomi
COUNTY SANrTATION DISTRICT
.I ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
>A ION 91 V
NOYMYN VY Y.GLL6dlb1 y+)I&IfN
�� mnap.wn
MAJORISSUES
The following major issues are not addressed by the Commitment Agreement
because they are in the nature of policy, administrative or operational issues that will be
addressed in the norntal course of business of the clew District, as follows:
- Revenue collection, whether through tipping fees or otherwise.
The District will pursue the best available mechanisms to secure
the payment of the tipping fees from the haulers and other parties
using the landfills, including enacting procedures governing fee
collection. The District may also consider other available methods
for funding the system, such as user fees.
- Operational planning and capital improvement planning.
The 1993 County Waste Disposal Agreements contemplated the
creation of a Commission having approval rights over County
planning, but the existence of the District will directly involve the
represented Cities in all aspects of system operation, including
capital and operating planning.
- General and environmental indemnification.
The new District will consider the benefits of offering member
entities protection from liability in exchange for the commitment of
the group of Orange County Cities, through the District, to remedy
environmental problems using the resources provided by the
tipping fees.
- Equitable distribution of resources.
Funding for the service programs offered by the District, such as
the household hazardous waste disposal program, must be
equitable, such that each member entity has access to its
proportionate share of services. Further, commitments such as
designated disposal locations may be considered by the District
with a viewpoint toward satisfying the concerns of its member
agencies.
- Protection of the landfills from unauthorized hazardous waste
disposal and Hauler compliance with operating rules.
COUNTY SANITATION MsTwT:
0 OOANGI COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
OA NU.61D
'� IOWfYi VIILLA.fJLLYpIG.pZJ2Bbt3
- nlaa�s�n
The District will consider the development of protection programs
on par with the enforcement programs in place to protect the
wastewater treatment facilities in the County. The District's
regulatory powers will be of substantial assistance in controlling
hazardous waste and obtaining compliance from the haulers with
operating rules and procedures.
Advisory positions on franchise agreements and local flow
enforcement programs.
The final form of franchise agreements and franchise ordinance
enforcement are matters for final local decision, but the member
entities of the District should work as a team to develop an advisory
approach.
.Franchise authority protection.
The District may consider formulating a position in support of any
local City faced with a challenge to its franchising authority.
Ultimately, a challenge against any City is a challenge against the
structure that supports the District
Data management-
The District will have an interest in supporting the Cities in meeting
their recycling and landfill diversion requirements.
Trash importation.
The District will have an interest in determining the advisability of
trash importation as a revenue raising measure.
Dispute resolution between parties.
The District will have an interest in considering a process of dispute
resolution.
2
_4 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
JANUARY 24, 1996
Agenda Item (8): Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying
payment of claims of the joint and individual
Districts (each Director shall be called only once
and that vote will be regarded as the same for each
District represented unless a Director expresses a
desire to vote differently for any District).
Summary
See attached listing of claim payments.
Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of payment of claims listing.
l\WVWC\6S\PGBB\/FNSSOI-08
,uNu Nu 91N9 - JI Ulel WONKINU CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 11110195 PAGE 7
REPORT NUMBER AP43 � ^'
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 11115/95 POSTING DATE I I/15/95
SUMMARY AMOUNT
01 OPER FUND $231.60
01 CONSTR FUND $1.345.57
02 OPER FUND $1.769.25
02 CAP FAC FUND $45.970.48
02 CONSTR FUND $4,694.95
03 OPER FUND $25.127.00
03 CAP FAC FUND $423.166.82
23 CONSTR FUND $3.87140
05 OPER FUND $429.60
05 CONSTR FUND $1,076 49
06 OPER FUND $173.00
06 CONSTR FUND f758.OB
07 OPER FUND $0,864.61
07 CAP FAC FUND 9550.170.66
07 CONSTR FUND $1,307.43
011 OPER FUND $249.25
811 CAP FAC FUND $202.677.12
011 CONST FUND $1.197.87
013 OPER FUND $8.50
PIZ CONST FUND $3.40
014 OPER FUND $50.00 $ 50.00
014 CAP FAC FUND $311. 23 311,059.23
014 CONST FUND f19.86 19.96
05 8 6 OPER FUND $166.94
6586 CAP FAC FUND 3156,990.37 $311.129.19
07 f/4 OPER FUND $794.77
JT OPER FUND $850.139,29
CORE $910.505.92
SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND f19,724.59
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $306.045.29
$3.644.681.74
FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 11R2/95 PAGER
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 11/20/95 POSTING DATE 11129/95
WARRANT NO. VENDOR
146595 WACKENHUT CORP. f14,300.70 CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS
148596 WALL STREET JOURNAL $306.01 SUBSCRIPTION
148597 WARREN GORHAM&IAMONT INC $190.74 PUBLICATION
140598 WAXIE $222.71 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
148509 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $23.912.54 CAUSTIC SODA MO 8-23.95
148600 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $813.23 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
148601 WESCO $574.03 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
148602 WOLFE AND ASSOCIATES,INC. $3,949.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
148603 ROURKE,WOODRUFF&SPRADUN $92.805.51 LEGAL SERVICES NO7-28-95
148604 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $97954 LAB SUPPLIES
148605 JOHNSON YOKOGAWA CORP. $81.06 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 11129195 f1,851,112.20
SUMMARY AMOUNT
02 OPEN FUND $14.26
02 CAP FAC FUND 32,041.51
63 OPER FUND $52,821.92
03 CAP FAC FUND $23.926.29
AS OPER FUND $689.25
07 OPER FUND $430.42
07 CAP FAC FUND $20.292.92
011 OPER FUND $9.593.98
f1,940.43 $1,940.43
014CAPFACFUND f2622.75 2,122.75
0596 OPER FUND $17.60
06&7 OPER FUND $211.12 $4,563.18
07&14 OPER FUND $16.59
Sr OPER FUND $913.082.79
CORF $569.880.05
SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $28,159.68
Jr DIST WORKING CAPITAL $225.670.47
$L851,112.20
FUND NO 9199 IT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 12/08/95 PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 12/13195 POSTING DATE 12/13195
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
148631 A-1 VISUAL SYSTEMS $1.533.50 OFFICE SUPPLIES
148632 ABB INDUSTRIAL SYSTEMS INC 92,660.00 TRAINING-MAINTENANCE
148633 AG TECH COMPANY 558,160.63 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91
148634 ABRASIVE ENO.TOOLING A EQUIP. $142.49 HARDWARE
14BB35 ACORN CONSULTING $4,485.00 CONSULTING SERVICES
14BS36 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $18,037.20 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.O.B-&M
148637 ALTA-ROBBINS $320.70 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
148638 AMERIDATA $1,496.49 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
148639 BLAKE P.ANDERSON $108.57 REIMBURSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE
148640 AND(TER-DISTRIBUTION $494.79 COMPUTER SUPPLIES
148641 APPLE ONE $4,083.20 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
148642 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $16.168.95 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
148643 AQUATIC BIOASSAY B CONSULT S2,B35.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
148W ARENS INDUSTRIES.INC. 54,072.51 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
148645 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT $851.90 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
148646 ARMOR-VAC $1,600.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES
145647 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. $120.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL
148648 ASSOCIATED CONCRETE PRODUCTS $533.38 BUILDING MATERIALS
148649 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $4,333.66 PAYROLL SERVICES
148650 E S BABCOCK&SONS INC 5555.D0 LAB ANALYSIS
148651 BANANA BLUEPRINT $592.68 PRINTINGM.0.11417-94
148652 BANCROFT-WHITNEY CO.. $333.48 PUBLICATION
148653 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $810.20 BATTERIES
148654 BAUER COMPRESSOR $311.00 COMPRESSOR PARTS
146655 BEAR STATE PUMP&EQUIP $794.76 PUMP PARTS
146650 BEHR PROCESS CORP $62.94 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148657 BEV CUSTER $86.20 PUBLICATIONS
148658 WT BILLARD S5118.69 BUILDING REPAIRS
148659 BIO-GRO DIVISION $43,309.28 RESIDUALS REMOVAL NO 4-MBS
148660 BLAIRJMRTIN CO,INC. $189.43 VALVE MANIFOLDS
148661 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $16,728.10 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1d/,P248
148662 BNI BOOKS $167.80 BOOKS
148663 THE BURKE COMPANY $96.12 CONTAINERS
148664 BURKE ENGINEERING CO $292.17 ELECTRIC PARTS
148665 BUSH&ASSOCIATES,INC. $4,504.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.84-94
148566 CH2M HILL $215,760.82 ENGINEERING SERVICES JJt
145667 C.L.TECHNOLOGY $72000 GAS ANALYSIS SERVICES
148568 C M H SOFTWARE $256.50 SOFTWARE
148669 C.P.I. $1.549.91 LAB SUPPLIES
148670 CS COMPANY $8.012.92 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
148671 CALFON CONSTRUCTION $452.364.94 CONSTRUCTION 7-22&7.24
148672 CALTROL,INC. $9,552.85 HARDWARE
148673 CALIFORNIA AUTO COLLISION,INC. $2,681.01 TRUCK BODY REPAIR
148674 CALIF.ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS $16.00 MECHANICAL PARTS
148675 CALIFORNIA WATER ENVIRONMENTAL $555.48 PUBLICATIONS
148676 CAMAU CORP. $400.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
FUND NO 9199 - Jr DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 12/08/95 PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 12/13195 POSTING DATE 12113195
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
148677 CANUS CORPORATION $593.39 FIBER OPTIC CABLE
14BB78 CARLETON ENGINEERS $25.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES-AIR QUALITY
148679 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $348.25 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-38,J-33
149680 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $1,458.79 OFFICE FURNITURE
14B681 CERFNET $52.35 COMPUTER SERVICES
148682 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $10.117.73 PUMP PARTS
148683 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $16,671.44 ELECTRIC PARTS
148W CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS $613AD FREIGHT
148685 CONSUMER PIPE $1,877.64 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
148666 CONTINENTAL EQUIP B SUPPLY $548.73 MISC.HARDWARE
148687 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $3,368.51 ENGINE PARTS
148688 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $132.18 TRUCK PARTS
148689 COUNTERPART ENTERPRISES $246.86 MECHANICAL SUPPUES
148690 COUNTY CLERK $200.00 EXEMPTION FEE
148691 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $3.172.65 ELECTRIC PARTS
148692 CREATIVE SCREEN ARTS $420.33 SAFETY TAGS
148693 CROMPTON 8 KNOWLES COLORS $181.80 TRACING DYE
148694 CHARLES P.CROWLEY,CO. $911.99 INSTRUMENT PARTS
148695 OGS-PROCUREMENT $76.00 PUBUCATIONS
148696 ALBERT W DAMES INC $135.286.34 CONSTRUCTION 3-36R
148697 DELL COMPUTER CORP $25.275.39 COMPUTER PARTS
148698 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIF. $34.363.26 DENTAL INSURANCE PLAN M.O.1.12.94
148699 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $940.00 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE
148700 DRESSER INDUSTRIES $2.133.68 INSTRUMENT PARTS
148701 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $299.44 PAINT SUPPLIES
148702 OVALS SALES $428.68 FIRINGS
148703 ESP NORTH $1.857.22 MECHANICAL SUPPUES
148704 E-TRACE INSTRUMENTS $287.00 COMPUTER PARTS
148705 EDWARDS HIGH VACUUM INTER $148.92 LAB SUPPLIES
148706 HELEN EGGERS $401.08 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148707 ELECTAIRTOOLCO $752.17 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
146708 ENCHANTER,INC. $2,8D0.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5.24-95
148709 ESSCO PUMPS AND CONTROLS $401.17 PUMP PARTS
148710 ENVIRONMENTAL PROD.USA $2,413.60 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
148711 EXFO $8,795.00 FISEROPTIC TEST KIT
148712 FLUID TECH.SALES $2.146.44 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
143713 FST SAND AND GRAVEL,INC. $511.04 ROAD BASE MATERIALS
148714 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $13.535.00 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.D.149-91
148715 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $649.75 AIR FREIGHT
148710 FIRST CHOICE $810.55 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT
148717 FISCHER 8 PORTER CO. $356.21 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES
148718 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $1,370.50 LAB SUPPLIES
148719 FISONS INSTRUMENTS $040.45 LAB SUPPLIES
148720 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $261.18 PHOTO SUPPLIES
148721 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $18,678.96 WATER USE
143722 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $496.40 PAINT SUPPLIES
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 12JOBMS PAGE 3
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 12J13/95 POSTING DATE 12//3815
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
148723 THE FOXBORO CO. $133.09 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
146724 FRY'S ELECTRONICS $573.65 ELECTRONIC B COMPUTER SUPPLIES
148725 FULLER FORD $17.729.19 TRUCK
148726 CITY OF FULLERTON $373.51 WATER USE
148727 GST,INC. $1,032.66 OFFICE SUPPLIES
148728 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $2.005.87 LUMBER4VRDWARE
148729 GARRATT-CALIAHAN COMPANY $2,669.84 CHEMICALS
148730 THE GARTNER GROUP $32,583.34 SERVICE AGREEMENT
148731 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $368.59 ELECTRIC PARTS
148732 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1,024.97 TELEPHONE SERVICES
148733 GIERLICH44ITCHELL.INC. $6.157.48 PUMP PARTS
14B734 GA INDUSTRIES INC. $1,486.00 VALVE
148735 GOODWAY TECHNOLOGIES CORP. $999.49 INDUSTRIAL VACUUM
148736 GOVT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOC. $480.00 CAFR AWARD SUBMITTAL
148737 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $3.888.01 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
148730 GRASSY S.T.I. $2.389.26 ENGINE PARTS
148739 GRAYBAR $60.30 COMMUNICATION SUPPLIES
148740 DGA CONSULTANTS $10.806.11 SURVEYING SERVICES MO S-23-95 T.MO 6-8-94
148741 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS $3,786.80 CONTAINER RENTALS
148742 PL HAWN CO,INC. $9."0.42 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
148743 HELLO DIRECT $397.35 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
148744 HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT $2,083.33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN.
148745 HEWLETT PACKARD $202.58 SERVICE AGREEMENT
148746 HILTI,INC. $3.045.03 TOOLS
148747 HOERBIGER CVS CALIF.,INC. $279.08 COMPRESSOR PARTS
148748 HOLMES 8 NARVER,INC. S34,847.59 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1d4,P2-53
148749 HOME DEPOT $898.07 SMALL HARDWARE
146750 SOUTHWEST SCIENTIFIC,INC. $928.16 METER PARTS
148751 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $1.407.77 PAINT SUPPLIES
148752 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $19.33 WATER USE
148753 HYCLONE LABORATORIES INC $820.51 LAB SUPPLIES
148754 IDM CONTROLS INC $303.90 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
148755 IEEE SERVICE CENTER - C87 $766.66 PUBLICATIONS
148756 IPCO SAFETY $4.081.19 SAFETY SUPPLIES
148757 IRD MECHANALYSIS $537.54 INSTRUMENT PARTS
148758 ITT BARTON SALES $2.023.51 BACKFLOW TESTERS
148759 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $124,588.93 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.11-16-92
148760 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $210.61 CONNECTORS
148761 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $5.10 WATER USE
148762 J.D.I.TECHNOLOGIES $500.63 PRINTER PARTS
148763 AT COMPUTER SOURCE,INC. 11,906A0 SOFTWARE
148764 JAMISON ENGINEERING $5,105.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
146765 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $603.28 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
148768 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO. $2,629.66 GAUGE
148767 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $137A9 ELECTRIC PARTS
14B76S JONES CHEMICALS,INC. $15.239.78 SODIUM HYPOCHLORTTE MO 4-26-95
FUNDING 9199 - IT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 12/0M95 PAGE4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 12/13/95 POSTING DATE 121/3/95
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
148769 KALLEEN'S COMPUTER PRODUCTS $1,190.96 COMPUTER SUPPLIES
148770 FRANCES L.KALUZNY $1,760.00 HUMAN RESOURCES CONSULTANT
148771 KENNEDY HYDRAULICS $1.357.38 MOTOR REPAIRS
148772 KING BEARING,INC. $1.548.42 MACHINE SUPPLIES
148773 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $3,095.24 TOOLS
148774 LEE B RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC. $8,353.31 ENGINEERING SERVICES
148775 K.P.LINDSTROM.INC. $9.656.61 ENVIR.CONSULTING SERVICES MO 12.9-90
148775 MPS $97.88 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
140777 MACOMCO $464.10 SERVICE AGREEMENT
148778 MAG SYSTEMS $526.90 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
148779 MAINTENANCE TECH.SERV. $1.141.14 MISC.HARDWARE
143780 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS,INC. $5,088.21 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
148781 MARDEN SUSCO INC. $93.75 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
148782 DICK E MARSH - $40.00 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148783 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $576.65 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
146784 MIDWAY MFG.B MACHINING $8.028.39 MECHANICAL REPAIRS
148785 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3,408.35 UNIFORM RENTALS
148786 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO. $217.00 INSTRUMENT
148787 MOORE INDUSTRIES $972.83 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
148788 NEC TECHNOLOGIES,INC. $6,215.65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
148789 NATIONAL ENVIRO.INFO.SERV. $111.50 PUBLICATION
148790 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES $6,001.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES
148791 NATIONAL WATER RESEARCH $50,000.00 ANNUAL CONTRIBUTION-NWRI
148792 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $676.13 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
148793 NETWORK GENERAL CORP. $4.999.61 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
148794 NEWARK ELECTRONICS $260.52 INSTRUMENT PARTS
148795 NICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY $3.144.43 LUBRICANTSA31ESEL FUEL
148796 LOYD T.NITZEN II AND $22,000.00 LIABILITY CLAIM SETTLEMENT
148797 NORGREN 5769.40 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
148798 NORTEL PRODUCT TRAINING $1,345.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
148799 NU-WEST FABRICATION 8304.28 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
148600 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $4.438.45 OFFICE SUPPLIES
148801 THE OHMART CORP 81,113.81 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
148802 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $2,318.28 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
148803 ORANGE COURIER $294.60 COURIER SERVICES
148804 ORANGE VALVE 8 FITTING CO. $2,526.01 FITTINGS
148805 ORRICK HERRINGTON B SUTCLIFFE $4.000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
146806 OXYGEN SERVICE $2.547.39 SPECIALTY GASES
148807 COUNTY OF ORANGE $60.00 ADMINISTRATIVE FEES
14BBOS ORANGE CO EMPLOYEES $204.796.00 EARLY RETIREMENT PROGRAM MO3R95
148809 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 910,848.51 WORKER'S COMP REIMBURSEMENT
146010 COUNTY OF ORANGE $199.00 PERMITS
148811 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT $84,594.50 GAP WATER USE M.O.6-9-93
148812 PSI $881.62 HARDWARE
148813 PSOC(POOL SUPPLY OF OC) $113.73 OPERATING SUPPLIES
148814 PSSI 85,445.45 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 12J08195 PAGES
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 12J13195 POSTING DATE 12/13195
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
148815 PACIFIC CLIPPINGS $113.20 CONTRACT SERVICE
146818 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $1,777.66 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
148817 PACIFIC PARTS $55.623.20 INSTRUMENT PARTS
148818 PACO PUMPS $1.456.22 FITTINGS
148819 PACIFIC BELL $16.62 TELEPHONE SERVICES
148820 PACIFIC WALK-IN MEDICAL $60.00 MEDICAL SERVICES
148821 PAGENET $82.10 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
148822 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $5.294.30 REIMB.PETTY CASH,TRAINING&TRAVEL
148823 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $110,041.20 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.349-95
148024 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS $358.06 CONSULTING SERVICE
148825 POLYPURE,INC. $20.931.50 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11.92
148826 POWER DESIGN $943.90 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS
1411827 POWER SYSTEMS TESTING CO. $1.100.00 REPAIR RELAY METERS
148828 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $96.00 ICE FOR SAMPLES
148829 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE IND. $304.00 SOILTESTING
148830 PROMINENT FLUID CONTROL,INC. $799.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL
148831 PRIMA $205.00 MEMBERSHIP FEE
10532 PUBLIC SECTOR EXCELLENCE ENCE $2,250.00 TRAINING CONSULTANT-RISK MGMT
148833 PUMPING SOLUTIONS $176.71 PUMP PARTS
148834 QUESTRON CORP. $848.00 LAB SUPPLIES
146835 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $1,891.16 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS
148836 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $2.062.75 TRASH REMOVAL
148837 RAIN FOR RENT $2,747.94 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
148B38 RED WING SHOES $254.29 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES
148839 THE REGISTER $2.149.60 NOTICES A ADS
146840 REISH MARINE STUDIES,INC. $760.00 OCEAN MONITORING
148541 REMEDYTEMP $14.709.17 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
148842 REPUBLIC ENGINES $84.47 TRUCK PARTS
148843 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $47.42 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
148844 SCHWING AMERICA,INC. $1.606.43 PUMP PARTS
148845 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $275.84 SPECIALTY GASES
148846 SEA COAST DESIGNS $2.909.25 LAB SUPPLIES
148847 CITY OF SEAL BEACH $301.05 WATER USE
148848 SELF INSURANCE PLANS $674.68 LICENSE FEE
148849 SENTIENT SYSTEMS,INC. $8,400.00 FACILITATOR SERVICES
148650 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $3.464.12 TOOLS
148851 SHASTA ELECTRIC $21.710.00 CONTRACT SERVICE
148852 SHURELUCK SALES $1.550.08 TOOLSMAROWARE
148853 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $1.796.09 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS
148854 SMITH-EMERY CO. $216.00 SOIL TESTING M.0.7-13-94
148855 SOUTH BAY FOUNDRY INC $5.252.81 MANHOLE FRAMES
148056 SOUTHCOASTWATER $160.00 LABSUPPLIES
148857 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. $62,775.45 POWER
148858 STARNA CELLS,INC. $173.19 LAB SUPPLIES
148859 SUMMIT STEEL $2.050.57 METAL
148860 SUNSETFORD $136.19 TRUCK PARTS
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 12/08MS PAGE 6
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 12/13/95 POSTING DATE 12/13195
WARRANT NO. VENDOR
148861 SUPELCO,INC. $81.20 LAB SUPPLIES
140862 SUPER CHEM CORP. $870.80 CHEMICALS
148863 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $214.40 ELECTRIC CART PARTS
148864 TEKMAR COMPANY 5181.93 LAB SUPPLIES
148665 THEODORE ROBBINS FORD $2,181.93 VEHICLE RENTAL-SUMMER PROGRAM
148866 THE RYAN TYLER GROUP $740.00 BANK STATEMENT RECONCILIATION
140867 THOMAS BROS MAPS $4,310.00 PRINTING
148868 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $117.26 MECHANICAL PARTS
148869 TONER SYSTEM INTERNATIONAL $1.303.78 PRINTER SUPPLIES
148870 TONYS LOCK 8 SAFE SERVICE $148.67 LOCKS 8 KEYS
148871 TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY,INC. $3,973.54 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.O.5-11-94
148872 TRUCK 8 AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $341.94 TRUCK PARTS
148873 TRUCK PARTS SUPPLY $70.63 TRUCK PARTS
148874 TRUESDAIL LABS $4,90800 LAB SERVICES
148875 JG TUCKER 8 SON,INC. $6,528.05 INSTRUMENT PARTS
148876 TWINING LABORATORIES $13.712.68 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-13-94
148877 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $30.00 LAB SUPPLIES
148878 UNISOURCEB/OR BUTLER PAPER $239.74 OFFICE SUPPLIES
148879 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 362.38 PARCEL SERVICES
148880 VWR SCIENTIFIC $1.538.83 LAB SUPPLIES
148851 VALIN CORPORATION 8880.59 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
148882 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS $2,225.01 FREIGHT
148883 VERNE'S PLUMBING $475.00 PLUMBING SERVICES
148864 VERTEX SYSTEMS $7,400.00 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT
148885 VORTEX INDUSTRIES $544.28 BUILDING REPAIRS
148008 WACKENHUT CORP. $31,616.23 CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS
146887 WAL-CON CONSTRUCTION CO. $276,034.94 CONSTRUCTION 5-37-3
148880 CARLWARREN&CO. $443.77 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR
148889 WARRINGTON $3.492.50 SERVICE AGREEMENT
148890 WATERS CORPORATION $3.674.01 SERVICE AGREEMENT
148891 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $20,719.94 CAUSTIC SODA MO 8-23-95
148892 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $958.04 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
148893 WESCO $14.43 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
148894 WIRE MARKERS,INC. $2.245.72 MARKERS
140895 XEROX CORP. $18,38THI COPIER LEASES
148896 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $860.92 LABSUPPLIES
148097 RICHARD YOUNG PRODUCTS $660.90 INSTRUMENT PARTS
148893 ZYMARK CORP. $851.23 LAB EQUIPMENT
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 12/13195 $2.702,335.85
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 12/08195 PAGE 7
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 12113195 POSTING DATE 12/13195
SUMMARY AMOUNT
01 OPER FUND $560.80
02 OPER FUND $5.462.08
02 CAP FAC FUND $25.170.81
03OPERFUND $41.851.11
03 CAP FAC FUND $146.377.25
05 OPER FUND $4.801.27
06 OPER FUND $161.60
07 OPER FUND $8,690.32
07 CAP FAC FUND $470,800.72
011 OPER FUND F28B.0D
011 CAP FAC FUND $304.00
014 CAP FAC FUND $15.95
0586 OPER FUND $2.319.55
0586 CAP FAC FUND $276,112.63
0687 OPER FUND $2,042.89
07814 OPER FUND $6.707.57
.IT OPER FUND 0775,555.24
CORF $393,437.92
SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $69,735.87
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL 6471,937.47
$2,702,335.85
FUND NO 9199 - Jr DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 12J21195 PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 1227/95 POSTING DATE 1227/95
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
148920 AG TECH COMPANY $63.227.33 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9.91
148921 ASL CONSULTING ENGINEERS $1,028.74 ATWOOD SUBTRUNCK PLAN PREPERATION
148922 ACORN CONSULTING $5.070.00 CONSULTING SERVICES
148923 AIR LIQUIDE AMERICA CORP. $289.42 SPECIALTY GASSES
148924 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $18,322.00 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.O.6-949
148925 AIAMO MOTOR LODGE $634.91 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148928 ALL METALS PROCESSING $1.243.29 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148927 ALUMINUM FORGE CO $1.008.11 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148928 AMERIDATA $1,588.19 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
148929 AMERICAN AIRLINES $4,149.88 TRAVEL SERVICES
148930 AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION $210.00 SEMINAR-VIDEOTAPEI
148931 AMERICAN SIGMA $5,682.76 MISCELLANEOUS HARDWARE
148932 AMER.SOCIETY FOR MICROBIOLOGY $325.00 LAB SUPPLIES
148933 AMOCO ENERGY TRADING $121,083.57 NATURAL GAS MO 6-28-95
148934 AMSCO $68.12 SERVICE AGREEMENT
148935 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL $990.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
148936 APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS,INC. $1.185.78 LAB SERVICES
148937 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $2,633.11 PRINTER PARTS
148938 APPLIED ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS $3,000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
148939 AQUATIC BIOASSAY B CONSULT $8,795.00 LABORATORY SERVICES
148940 ARMOR-VAC $522.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES
148941 ARROWHEAD ELECTRIC CORP. $345.71 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
148942 ARROWHEAD PURITAS WATERS $3,172.78 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148943 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. $60.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL
148944 AMSA $425.00 REGISTRATION
148945 ATLANTIC ENERGY SERVICE $8.993.00 GENERATOR REPAIR
148946 BFI MEDICAL WASTE SYSTEMS $87.80 WASTE DISPOSAL
148947 BANANA BLUEPRINT $2.687.24 PRINTING M.O.11-07-94
148948 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $470.91 BATTERIES
148949 BAXTER EDWARDS $1.399.09 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148950 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $3.605.00 LAB SUPPLIES
148951 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $274.65 TRUCK WASH TICKETS
148952 BEAR STATE PUMP&EQUIPMENT $79.10 PUMP PARTS
148953 BECKMAN INDUSTRIAL $1,649.34 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148954 BEST WESTERN PLAZA INT.INN $911.62 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148955 BEV CUSTER $13.00 PUBLICATIONS
148956 BLACK PROGRESS REVIEW $395.00 MESSAGE OF SUPPORT
148957 BLACKWELL WISSENSCHAFT $283.00 PUBLICATION
148958 BLOOMBERG L.P. $4,919.22 FINANCIAL MONITORING M.O.4-14-93
148959 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $27.243.80 ENGINEERING SERVICES MO 2-9-94&MO 9-27-95
148960 BREA COMMUNITY HOSPITAL $1.002.46 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148961 BUDGET INN $242.11 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148962 BUDGET JANITORIAL $4.329.50 JANITORIAL SERVICES MO 1.12-94
148963 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. $112.08 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
148964 BUSH&ASSOCIATES,INC. $7,298.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.84-94
148965 CCI TECHNOLOGIES $825.84 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1221195 PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 1227195 POSTING DATE 1227195
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
148DW CEMCORPORATION $185.48 LAB SUPPLIES
148967 CS COMPANY 5075.98 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
148968 CALTROL,INC. $1.348.50 HARDWARE
148969 CALIF ASSOC.OF SAN.AGENCIES $330.00 REGISTRATION
148970 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $977.56 SERVICE AGREEMENT
148971 CALTEX PLASTICS,INC. $1,490.00 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
148972 CAMALI CORP. $1,256.10 SERVICE AGREEMENT
148973 CANNON EQUIPMENT WEST INC 5737.60 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
140974 CANUS CORPORATION $377.16 FIBER OPTIC CABLE
148975 CARLETON ENGINEERS $390AM ENGINEERING SERVICES-AIR QUALITY
148976 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $48,653.70 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-38&P242
148977 CATALINA CYLINDERS $1,634.62 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148978 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $580.61 OFFICE FURNITURE
148979 CENTURY SAFETY INST.&SUPPLY $8,386.01 SAFETY SUPPLIES
148980 CERADYNE INC $457.87 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148981 - CHEM SERVICE INC. $215.74 LAB SUPPLIES
148982 CLEMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL $20,773.85 CONSULTANT-LANDFILL PROJECT MO 7-3145
148983 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $465.20 SERVICE AGREEMENT
148984 COCO'S•127 $125.20 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148985 COUCH&SONS $95,886.00 CONSTRUCTION I1.174
148986 COMBYTE USA INC. $3.776.44 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
148987 CONNELL GM PARTS I DIV. $122.43 TRUCK PARTS
140988 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $2.187.65 ELECTRIC PARTS
148989 CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS $595.53 FREIGHT
148990 CONTEMPO COIN LAUNDRY $150.20 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148991 CONTINENTAL EQUIPMENT&SUPPLY $332.95 TOOLS
148992 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $4,175AS ENGINE PARTS
148993 COSMOTRONIC 339BA9 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148994 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $221.25 TRUCK PARTS
148995 COUNTERPART ENTERPRISES $123.17 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
148998 COUNTY INVESTMENTS II $125.20 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148997 COUNTY CLERK $25.00 EXEMPTION FEE
148998 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $810A9 ELECTRIC PARTS
148999 CRAZY SHIRTS INC. $1,059.31 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149000 CHARLES P.CROWLEY.CO. $588.01 INSTRUMENT PARTS
149001 SWRCB/SW FEES $10,000.00 ANNUAL FEE-WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS
149002 SWRBC/BPTCP FEES $11,000.00 ANNUAL FEE-BAT PROTECTION&TOXIC CLEANUP
149003 DAMES&MOORE $8,000.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES
149004 NA VARCY COMPANY $7.953.40 LAB SUPPLIES
149005 DE LE JON ENTERPRISES $191.65 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149008 DELL COMPUTER CORP $212,727.60 COMPUTERS
149007 DEPT OF MOTOR VEHICLES $12.00 DMV RENEWAL
149008 DERLANINC. $2.208.68 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148009 THE DIAMOND GROUP $4,000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES -
149010 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $21,101.04 SERVICE AGREEMENTS
149011 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $793.30 PAINT SUPPLIES
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 12/2U95 PAGE 3
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 12r27/95 POSTING DATE 12/27196
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
149012 DUALS SALES $382.48 FITTINGS
149013 ESP NORTH $1,654.45 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
149014 ECOANALYSIS,INC. $1,950.50 CONSULTING SERVICES
149016 ECOSYSTEMS EN'G&ANALYSIS $11,739.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
149016 ELECTAIRTOOLCO 320SAS MECHANICAL PARTS
149017 ENCHANTER,INC. $3.500.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5-24-95
149018 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $21.97 FILTERS
149019 FIRST CHOICE $1.303.90 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT
149020 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $1,281.88 LAB SUPPLIES
149021 FISIONS INSTRUMENTS $98.93 SERVICE AGREEMENT
149022 FLICKINGER CO 51,615.17 VALVE
149023 FORD SAUVAJOT MANAGEMENT GROUP $1.995.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
149024 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA MAS PHOTO SUPPLIES
149025 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $725.30 PAINT SUPPLIES
149028 FRY'S ELECTRONICS $403.48 ELECTRONIC B COMPUTER SUPPLIES
149027- FUJI TRU COLOR INC. $321.12 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149028 GMF SOUND INC $29.40 ELECTRIC PARTS
149029 CST,INC. $11,308.77 OFFICE SUPPLIES
149030 GARDEN GROVE COMMUNITY CHURCH $1,724.04 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149031 GEMINI INDUSTRIES $1.152.42 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149032 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $3.989.07 ELECTRIC PARTS
149033 GENERAL OCEANICS,INC. $250.00 LAB SERVICES
149034 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $7,549.79 TELEPHONE SERVICES
149035 GERARD TILE CO.USA $4,077.41 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149036 GIERLICH-MITCHELL,INC. $171.09 PUMP PARTS
149037 GOVT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOC. $50.00 AWARD FEE
149038 GOVERNMENT INSTITUTES INC $955.00 PUBLICATIONS
149039 GRAPHIC CONTROLS $235.46 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
149040 GRASSY S.T.I. $3.096.61 ENGINE PARTS
149041 DGA CONSULTANTS $8.748.21 SURVEYING SERVICES MO B-23-95&NO 641-94
149042 DAVID R.GRIFFIN $117,774.65 LEGAL SERVICES-TECHNE PIPE M.O.9-W94
149043 GULLIVER'S INC. $410.78 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149044 GUNTHER ATHLETIC SERVICE $100.70 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149045 GEORGE T.HALL CO. $1,157.16 ELECTRICPARTS
149046 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $1.356.14 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
149047 HATCH&KIRK,INC. $3,804.24 TRUCK PARTS
140N8 HAWKINS ASSOCIATES $1,262.72 LAB EQUIPMENT
149049 PL HAWN CO,INC. $27.01 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
149050 HEALTH SCIENCE ASSOCIATES $1.750.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
149051 HILT],INC. 52,893.75 TOOLS
149052 HINCKLEY B SCHMITT $608.46 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149053 HOERBIGER CVS CALIF.,INC. $43.21 COMPRESSOR PARTS
149054 HOLIDAY SPA HEALTH CLNJB $2.565.47 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149055 HOME DEPOT $975.19 SMALL HARDWARE -
149056 PIS HUGHES CO,INC. $607.02 PAINT SUPPLIES
149057 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO $2,009.25 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE IWIMS PAGE 4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID IZ27195 POSTING DATE 12127MS
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
149058 IPCO SAFETY $025.94 SAFETY SUPPLIES
149059 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $17,646.28 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11-18.92
149060 INDUSTRIAL METAL SUPPLY CO. $958.48 STEEL
14SD61 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $157.12 CONNECTORS
149062 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. 571.61 TRUCK PARTS
149083 INORGANIC VENTURES $377.72 LABSUPPLIES
149064 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $1.097.06 BATTERIES
149065 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $76.84 WATER USE
149D66 IRVINE SC4TECH BOOKS $52.47 PUBLICATIONS
149D67 ISLANDER MOTEL $199.74 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149088 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY 5760.8E JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
149069 JAY'S CATERING $495.75 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE
149070 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $40.33 ELECTRIC PARTS
149071 JONES CHEMICALS,INC. $18.401.96 SODIUM HYPOCHLORTTE MO4-28-95
149072 AMERICAN METAL BEARING CO $175.01 BEARINGS
14SD73- KARS'ADVANCED MATERIALS,INC. 33,465.00 MACHINE TESTING
149074 KERRY CONSULTING GROUP $13,361.05 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MO I1-15-95
149076 KIMMERLE BROS.INC. 6105.65 MECHANICAL PARTS
149076 KING BEARING,INC. $719.28 MACHINE SUPPLIES
14SD77 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $6,625.39 TOOLS
149078 LA PALMA INTER HOSPITAL $554.60 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149079 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY CO. $52.83 SAFETY SUPPLIES
149080 LAUNDERLAND $90.38 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149DB1 LAUNDERLAND $223.27 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149082 LAUNDERLAND $205.77 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149083 LEACH CORP $931.95 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149084 LEE 6 RO CONSULTING ENGR $30,450.73 ENGINEERING SERVICES MO 5.12-93612-8-93
149085 K-P.LINDSTROM.INC. $2,338.07 ENVIR.CONSULTING SERVICES MO 12-9-90
14MW MPS $468.50 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
149087 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $552.966.00 CONSTRUCTION P1-36-2
149088 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $84.013.00 CONSTRUCTION P2424
149089 IRVINE MARRIOT HOTEL $3.487.36 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149090 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $335.61 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
149091 MES COMPANY $2,299.39 REPAIR
149092 MICEL INC $249.74 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149093 MIDWAY MFG.6 MACHINING $4.518.66 MECHANICAL REPAIRS
149094 MISSION INDUSTRIES $4,063.80 UNIFORM RENTALS
149095 MITCHELL INTERNATIONAL INC $533.36 PUBLICATIONS
149M MOBILE HOSE AND HYDRAULIC $427.16 PUMP PARTS
149097 THE MOBILE STORAGE GROUP $2,614.45 CARGO CONTAINER
149098 MOTEL 680034-01-05C $521.94 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
142099 MOTION INDUSTRIES,INC. $246.19 PUMP PARTS
149100 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $2,698.34 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
149101 NEWPORT HARBOR YACHT CLUB $117.17 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149102 NEWARK ELECTRONICS $173.85 INSTRUMENT PARTS
149103 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $260.00 UTILITY SERVICE CONNECTION
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE IMl M5 PAGE 5
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 12/27/95 POSTING DATE 1=7195
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
149104 NEWPORT CTR MEDICAL $243.95 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149105 NICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY $8.766.94 LUBRICANTSIDIESEL FUEL
149108 NORTEL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS $442.00 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS
149107 O'BRIEN ENERGY SYSTEMS 539,883.68 AUTOMATE GENERATORS
149108 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $385.13 SAFETY GLASSES
149109 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $1.356.03 OFFICE SUPPLIES
149110 OFFICE PAVILIONSANTERIOR RESOURCES $103,393.89 OFFICE FURNITURE REPAIRS
149111 OLD SPAGHETTI FACTORY $574.17 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149112 OLYMPIC CONTROLS INC - $89.95 REPAIR
149113 OMEGA CORPORATION $187.50 SECURITY SYSTEM REPAIRS
149114 ORANGE COUNTY FAIR&EXPO CTR $281.61 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149115 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $202.74 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
149116 ORANGE COURIER $222.75 COURIER SERVICES
149117 ORANGE VALVE 8 FITTING CO. $498.59 FITTINGS
149118 ORRICK HERRINGTON B SUTCLIFFE $3,000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
149119 OXYGEN SERVICE $1,538.49 SPECIALTY GASES
14912D COUNTY OF ORANGE $15.00 ADMINISTRATIVE FEES
149121 PSSI $1,969.65 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION
149172 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $1.232.66 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
149123 PACIFIC PARTS $32.728.92 INSTRUMENT PARTS
149124 PACIFIC BELL $1,389.72 TELEPHONE SERVICES
149125 PAKWEST 562.56 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
149128 PARAGON CABLE $62.56 CABLE SERVICES
149127 PARKER HANNIFIN C2 $2.979.60 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149128 PARKHOUSE TIRE,INC. $530.55 TRUCK PARTS
149129 PARTS UNLIMITED $440.94 TRUCK PARTS
149130 R.F.PAULUS,INC. 315,175.OD CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
149131 PEABODY $716.38 PUMP PARTS
149132 PEERLESS WIPING MATERIALS $721.93 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
149133 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS S13,280.64 REIMS.PETTY CASH,TRAINING&TRAVEL
149134 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $114.196.50 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3-29-95
149135 PINATA FOODS $2,735.41 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149136 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS $1,920.DO CONSULTING SERVICES
149137 PITNEY BOWES $1.778.00 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS
149138 POLY ENTERPRISES INC 5996.69 SAFETY
149139 POLYMETRICS,INC. $7,262.75 LAB SUPPLIES
149140 POLYPURE,INC. $27,950.04 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92
149141 POWER SYSTEMS TESTING CO. $1.249.00 ELECTRIC PARTS
149142 PROJECT MGMT INSTITUTE(PMI) $156.75 PUBLICATIONS
149143 PROMINENT FLUID CONTROL,INC. 5799.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL
149144 PUBLIC FINANCIAL MGMT.,INC. $10,906.50 FINANCIAL CONSULTING SERVICES MO 7.31-95
149145 PRYOR REPORT $195.011 MANAGEMENT TRAINING
149146 PUMPING SOLUTIONS $577.24 PUMP PARTS
149147 OLP LAMINATES,INC. $1.387.82 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149146 OUESTRON CORP. 5580.00 LAB SUPPLIES
149149 RD SYSTEMS $75.00 MONITOR REPAIR
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 12/2l M5 PAGES °
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 1227105 POSTING DATE 1227195
WARRANT NO.
149150 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $1,570.36 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS
149151 R 8 R INSTRUMENTS $83.35 ELECTRIC PARTS
149152 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO. $153.03 LAB SUPPLIES
149153 RAYNE WATER SYSTEMS $824.59 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149154 REBIS $1.811.73 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
149155 RED WING SHOES 3113.78 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES
149158 REMEDYTEMP $962.37 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
149157 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $1.589.00 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
149158 RENOLD INC. $557.03 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
149159 SANTA FIE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $622.53 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
149160 SASCO ELECTRIC $6.255.00 CONTRACT SERVICES
149161 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTL $82,779.65 OCEAN MONITORING MO 641-948 MO 6-20-85
149162 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $100.36 SPECIALTY GASES
149163 SCOTT WILLIAM J. $317.07 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149164 SEA COAST DESIGNS $937.43 LAB SUPPLIES
149165- CITY OF SEAL BEACH 6378.80 WATER USE
149166 SELECT CIRCUITS $801.46 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149167 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $792.40 TOOLS
149168 SHEPARD BROTHERS $540.76 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149169 SHURELUCK SALES $8.025.05 TOOLSHARDWARE
149170 SIEMON,LARSEN.&MARSH $6,497.08 CONTRACT SERVICE
149171 SMITH-EMERY CO. $912.00 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-M94
149172 THE SMITH GROUP $5,213.00 CONTRACT SERVICE
149173 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. $45,782.30 POWER
149174 SO.CAL GAS.CO. $22,5%84 NATURAL GAS
149175 SOUTHWEST WHOLESALE NURSERY $19.650.00 CONTRACT SERVICE
149176 STAMEN Z.SPASSOFF P.E. 312,000.D0 ENGINEERING SERVICES
149177 SPICERS PAPER $91.29 OFFICE SUPPLIES
149178 STARNA CELLS,INC. $533.66 LAB SUPPLIES
149179 STATEK CORP $2,160.04 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149180 SUMMIT STEEL $98264 METAL
149181 SUNSET ENVIRONMENTAL $1,207.14 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149182 SUPELCO,INC. $223.49 LAB SUPPLIES
149183 SUPER ICE CORP. $80.22 LAB SUPPLIES
149184 SUPER POWER PRODUCTS 3517.2D JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
149185 SUPER SOLDER SERVICES $110.71 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149186 SYSTEMS BID INDUSTRIES INC. 3104.68 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149187 SYMCAS $2.436.25 CONSULTANT
149188 TCH ASSOCIATES $3.292.22 LAB SUPPLIES
149189 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $1,002.62 ELECTRIC CART PARTS
149190 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $701.31 MECHANICAL PARTS
149191 TIME MOTION TOOLS $66.78 TOOLS
149192 TOLOINC $555.23 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149193 TONY'S LOCK&SAFE SERVICE $167.95 LOCKS 8 KEYS
149194 TRAFFIC CONTROL ENGINEERING $1,440.00 ENGINEERING SERVICE
149195 TRISTAR $220.21 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
FUND NO 91" - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 120M PAGE 7
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 12R7/95 POSTING DATE 12MV115
WARRANT NO. VENDOR
149196 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $250.04 TRUCK PARTS
149197 TRUCK PARTS SUPPLY $26.11 TRUCK PARTS
149198 TRUESDAIL LABS $65.00 LAB SERVICES
149199 JG TUCKER&SON,INC. $4.669.36 INSTRUMENT PARTS
149200 TUSTIN DODGE $123.65 TRUCK PARTS
149201 TWINING LABORATORIES $13,595.07 SOIL TESTING M.0.7-13-94
149202 U.S.AUTO GLASS CENTERS $29.95 TRUCK PARTS
149203 US POSTAL SERVICE $132.41 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149204 US POSTAL SERVICE $143.23 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149205 US POSTAL SERVICE $130.29 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149206 US POSTAL SERVICE $448.20 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149207 UNISOURCEIVOR BUTLER PAPER $336.40 OFFICE SUPPLIES
149208 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $5B3.33 PARCEL SERVICES
149209 VWR SCIENTIFIC S443.53 LAB SUPPLIES
149210 VALIN CORPORATION $544.09 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
149211 VILLAGE NURSERIES $43.06 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES
149212 VORTEX(INDUSTRIES $325.24 BUILDING REPAIRS
149213 WACKENHUT CORP. $7,193.76 CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS
149214 WARNER CENTER ASSOCIATION $2D4.57 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149215 WARRINGTON $17.50 SERVICE AGREEMENT
149216 WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION $1,473.68 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT COURSES
149217 WECO INDUSTRIES,INC. $13.964.40 CHEMICALS
149218 WESTERN SKIES MOBILE HOME PARK $250.84 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149219 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $17,665.35 CAUSTIC SODA MO 843-95
149220 WESTERN SWITCHES $55.40 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
149221 WEST-UTE SUPPLY GO. $232.20 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
149222 WESCO $2,386.30 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
149223 JUDITH A.WILSON $72.54 REIMBURSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE
149224 WINONICS(BREA) $237.60 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
1492.25 WOLFE AND ASSOCIATES,INC. $1,305.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
149226 ROURKE,WOODRUFF&SPRADLIN $78,348.05 LEGAL SERVICES MO7-26-95
149227 XEROX CORP. $195.05 COPIER LEASES
149228 GEORGE YARDLEY GO. $715.83 LAB SUPPLIES
149229 ZYMARK CORP. $179.14 LAB EQUIPMENT
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 17,27195 92,628,999.39
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1221195 PAGE 8
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 1227195 POSTING DATE 1227195
SUMMARY AMOUNT
01 OPER FUND $3,000.00
02 OPER FUND $84.76
02 CAP FAC FUND $1.028.74
03 OPER FUND $16259.97
03 CAP FAC FUND $129,533.26
95 OPER FUND $640.54
06 CAP FAC FUND $62.31
07 OPER FUND $2.598.94
07 CAP FAC FUND $40.020.76
III OPER FUND 511,119.84
011 CAP FAC FUND $97.250.00
014 OPER FUND $291.50
014 CAP FAC FUND $19,650.00
0588 OPER FUND $16.75
0556 CAP FAC FUND 525,565.05
0697 OPER FUND $211.20
67814 OPER FUND $15.83
JT OPER FUND $747,037.33
CORF $1,311,228.89
SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $9,725.20
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $212,140 44
$2,628,999.39
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 01/05/96 PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 01/10/96 POSTING DATE 01/10/96
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
149M AG TECH COMPANY $59,271.65 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10.9-91
149259 ARK TECHNOLOGIES $6.000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
149260 A-Z LOGIC SYSTEMS $66.80 LAB SUPPLIES
149261 ACORN CONSULTING $2.795.00 CONSULTING SERVICES
149262 AIR COLD SUPPLY,INC. $29.21 AIR CONDITIONER REPAIRS
149263 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $18,322.00 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.O.8-9M
149264 ALADDIN HOUSE $623.90 WINDOW BLINDS
149265 AMERIDATA $4.851.11 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
149265 AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION $320.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
149267 ANC(TER-DISTRIBUTION $722.58 COMPUTER SUPPLIES
149268 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $1,714.01 NOTICES&ADS
149269 APPLE ONE $704.00 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
149270 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $37.523.94 COMPUTER PARTS
149271 ARROWHEAD ELECTRIC CORP. $236.32 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
149272 E S BABCOCK&SONS INC $1,110.00 LABANALYSIS
149273 BANK OF AMERICA $393.42 BANKING CHARGES
149274 BARNES&NOBLE BOOKS $800.80 TECHNICAL PUBLICATIONS
149275 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $1,015.00 BATTERIES
149276 BAUER COMPRESSOR $8,020.38 COMPRESSOR PARTS
149277 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $4,213.99 LAB SUPPLIES
149278 BEAR STATE PUMP&EQUIPMENT $108.21 PUMP PARTS
149279 A BIEDERMAN INC $944.81 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
149280 810-GRO DIVISION $42.435.61 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 4-28.95
149281 BON-A-RUES $140.78 TRUCK PARTS
149282 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $13.208.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES MO 1-12-94
149283 BNI BOOKS $869.51 BOOKS
149284 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH INC. $206.84 LAB SUPPLIES
149285 CALTROL,INC. $574.55 HARDWARE
149286 CALIF ASSOC.OF SAN.AGENCIES $495.CO REGISTRATION
149287 CALTEX PLASTICS,INC. $228.40 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
149285 CAMALI CORP. $400.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
149289 CANUS CORPORATION $54.641.10 FIBER OPTIC CABLE
149290 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $21.574.15 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-33-2,P1-38&P243
149291 CASI RUSCO INC. $605.06 SAFETY SUPPLIES
149292 CENTHEPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $1,214.79 OFFICE FURNITURE
149293 CERFNET $37.40 COMPUTER SERVICES
149294 CHEMWEST INC. $5.00 REFUND MAIL FEES
149296 CLARKE CONTRACTING CO $42,682.50 CONSTRUCTION 7-14-2
149296 COLICH AND SONS $60.796.90 CONSTRUCTION M-044
149297 COUCH&SONS $122,640.00 CONSTRUCTION 11-17-1
149298 COMMUNICATION DEV.ASSOC. $2,250.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
149299 COMMUNICATIONS PERFORMANCE GROUP $17.850.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
149300 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $2,639.88 PUMP PARTS
149301 COMPUSERVE $166.13 COMPUTER SERVICES
149302 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $2.459.09 ELECTRIC PARTS
149303 CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS $131.33 FREIGHT
FUND NO 0199 - JF DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 01/05196 PAGE2 ,.
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 01I100IS POSTING DATE 01H0MG
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
149304 CONTINENTAL LAB PRODUCTS INC. $3.088.81 LAB SUPPLIES
149305 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $951.71 ENGINE PARTS
149306 CHARLES P.CROWLEY.CO. 579.08 INSTRUMENT PARTS
149307 DAVE'$BICYCLES,INC. $344.22 BIKE REPAIRS
149308 DELL COMPUTER CORP. 534,100.32 COMPUTER PARTS
149309 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $6.941.49 ANALYST
149310 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $1,035.69 PAINT SUPPLIES
149311 OVALS SALES $282.40 FITTINGS
149312 E.C.S. $344.00 PUBLICATIONS
149313 ESP NORTH $473.17 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
149314 EASTMAN,INC. $3.268.49 OFFICE SUPPLIES
149315 EDWARDS HIGH VACUUM INTER. $134.88 LAB SUPPLIES
M9316 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $867.70 LAB SERVICES
149317 FMC CORPORATION $91,487.40 HYDROGEN PEROXIDE MO 9-1494
149310 FASTFRAME OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $139.00 AWARDS FRAMING
149319 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $220.70 AIR FREIGHT
149320 FILTERLINE CORP. $613.25 FILTERS
149321 FILTER SUPPLY CO. 5257.54 FILTERS
149322 FIRST CO B I OR NORTHERN DIST. $525.99 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
149323 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $943.10 LAB SUPPLIES
149324 FISONS INSTRUMENTS $11,772.61 LAB SOFTWARE LICENSES
149325 CLIFFORD A.FORKERT $6.145.50 SURVEYING SERVICES MO 64495
149326 FRYS ELECTRONICS $394.14 ELECTRONIC B COMPUTER SUPPLIES
149327 CST,INC. $18,680.59 OFFICE SUPPLIES
149328 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $71A2 CHEMICALS
149329 GAUGE REPAIR SERVICE $368.58 INSTRUMENTPARTS
149330 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $137.87 ELECTRIC PARTS
149331 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1,124.81 TELEPHONE SERVICES
149332 GIERUCHWITCHELL,INC. $8,356.81 PUMP PARTS
149333 GOVT CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENT $250.00 REGISTRATION
149334 WWGRAINGER.INC. $191.24 COMPRESSOR PARTS
149335 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $422.08 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
149336 GRASSY S.T.I. $4,252.76 ENGINE PARTS
149337 GRAYSAR ELECTRIC WHOLESALE $456.89 PLANTAUTOMATION
149338 DGA CONSULTANTS $18.617.15 SURVEYING SERVICES MO 8-23-95B MO 641,94
149339 HACH COMPANY $1,077.64 LAB SUPPLIES
140340 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC 57.480.00 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
149MI HATCH&KIRK,INC. $1.265.99 TRUCK PARTS
149342 PL HAWN CO,INC. SB78.40 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
149343 HELPMATES PERSONNEL SERVICES SB02.58 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
149344 VICKI HESTON PERSONNEL SERVICE $8,384.42 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
149345 HILTI,INC. $1.664.08 TOOLS
14934E HOERBIGER CVS CALIF.,INC. $271.92 COMPRESSOR PARTS
149347 HOLMES B NARVER,INC. $19,585SI ENGINEERING SERVICES2-1P012 MOS-14-94
149348 HOME DEPOT $368.16 SMALL HARDWARE
149349 SOUTHWEST SCIENTIFIC,INC. $1.48049 METER PARTS
FUND NO 9199 - Jr DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 01106/96 PAGE 3
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 01110M POSTING DATE 01NOMS
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
149350 PIS HUGHES CO,INC. $1.073.50 PAINT SUPPLIES
149351 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $18,639.75 WATER USE
149352 HYCLONE LABORATORIES INC. $910.66 LAB SUPPLIES
149353 HYDROTEX INC. $1.532.15 TRANSMISSION FLUID
149354 IPCO SAFETY $1.435.91 SAFETY SUPPLIES
149366 INDUSTRIAL STEAM $1.393.38 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
149356 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $5.54 WATER USE
149357 JAMISON ENGINEERING $8,361.90 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
149358 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY - $836.57 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
149359 JAYS CATERING $461.54 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE
149360 JOBS AVAILABLE $170.00 NOTICES BADS
149361 JOHNSON CONTROLS INC. $956.32 ELECTRIC PARTS
149362 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $825.13 ELECTRIC PARTS
149363 JONES CHEMICALS,INC. $4.992.76 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE MO4-26-95
149364 KALLEEN'S COMPUTER PRODUCTS $331.50 COMPUTER SUPPLIES
149365 FRANCES L.KALUZNY $1.320.00 HUMAN RESOURCES CONSULTANT
149366 KEMIRON PACIFIC,INC. $66.867.24 FERRIC CHLORIDE MO9-27-95
140UT KING BEARING,INC. $984.51 MACHINE SUPPLIES
149358 KLEINFELDER $194.85 GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTING SERVICES
149369 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $6,970.80 TOOLS
149370 LEADERSHIP DIRECTORIES INC. $629.25 SUBSCRIPTIONS
149371 LEE&RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC. $4.582.08 ENGINEERING SERVICES
149372 LEWCO ELECTRIC $162.19 TRUCK PARTS
149373 SOCO-LYNCH CORP. $537.03 JANITORIAL SERVICES
149374 NEC ANALYTICAL SYSTEMS INC. $9.968.00 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING
149376 MPS $926.22 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
149376 MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY CORP. $887.22 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
149377 MARATHON ELECTRIC $745.05 ELECTRIC PARTS
149378 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $399.25 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
149379 MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. $732.56 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
149380 MIDWAY MFG,&MACHINING $875.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS
149361 MISSION INDUSTRIES $2,379.41 UNIFORM RENTALS
149382 MORTON SALT $1.042.22 SALT
149383 MOTION INDUSTRIES,INC. $227.25 PUMP PARTS
149384 NATIONAL INFORMATION DATA $503.95 PUBLICATION
149M NEAL SUPPLY CO. $82.11 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
149386 NEWARK ELECTRONICS $58.69 INSTRUMENT PARTS
149387 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $40.58 WATER USE
149388 91EXPRESSLANES $970.0D TRANSPONDERS&DEPOSIT
149389 OFFICIAL AIRLINE GUIDE $549.80 SUBSCRIPTIONS
149390 OLSTEN STAFFING SERVICES $3,472.00 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
149391 ON-LINE EKECTRONICS $83.80 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
149392 ON TECHNOLOGY $607.00 SOFTWARE
149393 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $339.27 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
149394 ORANGE COURIER $89A0 COURIER SERVICES
149395 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. $1,208.19 FITTINGS
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0IM5196 PAGE 4 - n
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID OVIOM6 POSTING DATE 01110MB
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
149396 OXYGEN SERVICE $1.281.88 SPECIALTY GASES
149397 COUNTY OF ORANGE 860.00 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICE FEES
149398 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $18.647.75 WORKER'S COMP REIMBURSEMENT
149389 COUNTY OF ORANGE $238.00 INSPECTION LABOR
149400 PACIFIC PARTS $63,598.08 INSTRUMENT PARTS
149401 PACIFIC BELL $15.06 TELEPHONE SERVICES
149402 PAINE WEBBER $61,394.69 COP REMARKETING FEES
140403 PARAGON CABLE $36.78 CABLE SERVICES
149404 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 32,240AI REIMS.PETTY CASH,TRAINING B TRAVEL
149406 PHOTRON USA $917.27 LAB SUPPLIES
149408 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $104,996.80 RESIDUALS REMOVIL M.O.3.29-95
149407 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS $19,433.31 CONSULTING SERVICE
149408 POLYPURE,INC. $23.376.47 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92
149409 POWER DESIGN 5943.90 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS
149410 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $112.00 ICE FOR SAMPLES
149411 PUMPING SOLUTIONS INC $808.90 PUMPS
149412 PUTZMEISTER,INC. 5647.97 PUMP PARTS
149413 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $154.96 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS
149414 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $2,062.75 TRASH REMOVAL
149416 RED WING SHOES $282.74 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES
149416 REMEDYTEMP $2,875.32 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
149417 RM MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL ANDIOR RTTTAL 328IA4 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
149418 RODNEY-HUNT CO $8,284A3 HEADWORKS REPAIR
149419 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $847.66 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
149420 SHAMROCK SUPPLY i198.05 TOOLS
149421 SHURELUCK SALES $6,363.01 TOOLSMARDWARE
149422 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO. $197.84 LAB SUPPLIES
149423 SO COAST AIR QUALITY $15.654.92 PERMIT FEES
14M24 SOUTH COAST WATER $160.00 LAB SUPPLIES
149425 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. $61.180.65 POWER
10426 SO.CALIFORNIA MARINE INST. $800.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
149427 STANG INDUSTRIAL PRODS. $638,66 HARDWARE
149428 STARNA CELLS,INC. $973.86 LAB SUPPLIES
149429 STATE STREET BANK $4,842.92 COP TRUSTEE SERVICES
149430 SUNSET INDUSTRIAL PARTS $271.87 PUMP PARTS
149431 SUPELCO,INC. $223.41 LAB SUPPLIES
148932 SUPER CHEM CORP. $1,338S5 CHEMICALS
10433 SUPER POWER PRODUCTS $362.04 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
149434 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $98.39 ELECTRIC CART PARTS
149435 TECHNOMIC PUBLISHING CO. $292.00 PUBLICATIONS
149436 TELEDYNE ANALYTICAL $3.566,92 INSTRUMENT PARTS
149437 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $569.89 MECHANICAL PARTS
149438 TONYS LOCK 8 SAFE SERVICE $198.86 LOCKS 8 KEYS
149439 TRUCK B AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $165.41 TRUCK PARTS
149440 TRUCK PARTS SUPPLY $224.43 TRUCK PARTS
149441 JG TUCKER B SON,INC. $11,234.19 INSTRUMENT PARTS
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 01105MG PAGE 5
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 01/10/96 POSTING DATE 01110/96
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
149442 UNISOURCE91OR BUTLER PAPER $1,078.26 OFFICE SUPPLIES
149443 VWR SCIENTIFIC $524.97 LAB SUPPLIES
149444 VARIAN ASSOCIATES INC $643.96 LAB SUPPLIES
149445 VOSSLER 8 COMPANY $266.53 VALVE PARTS
149440 WACKENHUT CORP. $8,996.51 CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS
149447 WAL-CON CONSTRUCTION CO. $78,194.11 CONSTRUCTION 6-37-3
149448 WA%IE $2.051.99 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
149449 WECO INDUSTRIES,INC. $14.083.16 CHEMICAL SUPPLIES
149450 WEST COAST INSTRUMENTS $247.46 GAUGE
149451 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $20.907.15 CAUSTIC SODA MO 8-23-95
149452 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $3.547.66 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
149453 WESCO $441.10 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
149454 JUDITH A.WILSON $89.09 REIMBURSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE
149455 XEROX CORP. $994.02 COPIER LEASES
149456 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. E913.29 LAB SUPPLIES
149457 JOHNSON YOKOGAWA CORP. $2.635.99 INSTRUMENTSUPPLIES
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 1110816 $1.510,638.32
FUND NO 9199 - Jr DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 01I05MS PAGES -
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 01110196 POSTING DATE 01/10/96
SUMMARY AMOUNT
01 OPER FUND $1.459.38
01 CONSTR FUND 58,069.26
02 OPER FUND $0.426.02
02 CAP FAC FUND $19.585.61
02 CONSTR FUND $20.620.74
03 OPER FUND $48,363.12
03 CAP FAC FUND $2,820.00
03 CONSTR FUND $18,782.13
05 OPER FUND $13.657.87
05 CONSTR FUND $4,350.51
06 OPER FUND $374.37
06 CONSTR FUND $2,218.86
97 OPER FUND $3.893.57
07 CAP FAC FUND $42.700.00
07 CONSTR FUND $4,079.87
011 OPER FUND $1.371.72
011 CAP FAC FUND $125,302.73
011 CONSTR FUND $2.749.25
013 OPER FUND $78.60
013 CONSTR FUND $76.15
014 CAP FAC FUND $17.60
014 CONSTR FUND $447.92
0596 OPER FUND $2.653.22
0596 CAP FAC FUND $78,194.11
0687 OPER FUND $1,960.71
07814 OPER FUND $5.169.06
JT OPER FUND $590,262.84
CORP $260.472.07
SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $18.647.75
.IT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $225,832.68
$1.610.638.32
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
MEETING
AGENDA FOR
JANUARY 24, 1996
Agenda Item (9)(a): Consideration of motion authorizing renewal of
memberships in the California Association of
Sanitation Agencies (CASA) and the Association
of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies (AMSA) for
the 1996 calendar year.
Summary
The annual fees for membership in these organizations are due each January. The Districts' basic dues
are$9,000.00 for CASA and$15,142.00 for AMSA
The CASA organization maintains offices in Sacramento and has an active program dealing with the State
administration and wastewater legislative matters and proposed regulations of the State Water Resources
Control Board.
The AMSA organization represents the large metropolitan sewering agencies at the Federal level. A
national office is maintained in Washington, D.C., and their personnel are actively engaged in the many
facets of the national scene. Not only do they work with the staff of the numerous congressional
committees concerned with water pollution control regulations, but their information service on current
environmental protection agency regulations is extremely helpful to the Districts.
Recommendation
Staff recommends renewal of memberships and payment of the annual dues for the California Association
of Sanitation Agencies(CASA)and the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies(AMSA)for the
1996 calendar year.
J:UVPDOr\GWCOMMr rrEUTBDS1A1012496.
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
JANUARY 24, 1996
Agenda Item (9)(b): Consideration of Resolution No. 96-1, accepting
Purchase of Spark Ignited Engines for Use in
Central Generation Systems, Job No. J-19A, as
complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of
Completion and approving Final Closeout
Agreement for a final total contract amount of
$19,436,644.82 (original awarded contract amount
of $18,968,113.00).
Summary
In 1984, staff developed a plan to utilize digester gas as the fuel source for producing
electrical power to meet the needs of the Districts well into the decade of the 1990s.
The Boards of Directors authorized hiring Brown and Caldwell Engineers to provide
detailed construction plans and specifications to build two central generation facilities.
The facilities used internal combustion engines, burning biomass produced fuel, to
produce electrical energy and utilize auxiliary systems to recover nearly all waste head
for process use and currently meeting or exceeding the electrical and head demands of
the District's facilities. Additional work is currently under design to completely eliminate
multiple ties to the electric utility, and other small modifications to provide even greater
use of recovered heat to improve the efficiency of the systems.
The original contract amount for this project is $18,968,113.00 The met amount of
change orders to date is $468,551.82. The final adjusted contract amount is
$19,436,644.82.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends consideration of the resolution authorizing acceptance of the work as
complete, executing the final Closeout Agreement, and file the Notice of Completion as
required.
JAWPD0CW%AG9WAN9619-B.W PD
1FFans
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
JANUARY 24, 1996
(9)(c): PDc55-26 consideration of the following actions
relative to the Plans and Specifications for
Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 2, (5,800 feet North of
ue To Imperial Highway) Contract No. 3-36-2:
tion of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications
for said project, authorizing an addition of$45,255.68 to the contract with Calfon
Construction, Inc., for seven items of additional work.
(2) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications
for said project, authorizing a deduction of$32,126.00 from the contract with Calfon
Construction, Inc. for an adjustment of engineer's quantities.
(3) Consideration of Resolution No. 96-16-3, accepting said project as complete, authorizing
execution of a Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement for a
final total contract amount of$1,104,882.68 (original awarded contract amount of
$1,091,753.00).
Summary
In November, 1994, the Directors approved the plans and specifications for Contract No. 3-38-
2, Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer , Reach 2,( 5,800 feet North of Rosecrans
Avenue to Imperial Highway), to be built as three separate construction contracts, 3-38-1, 3-38-
2 and 3-38-3. The $1.09 million project(3-38-2) located within the City of La Habra had to be
completed first because of the highway widening along Beach Boulevard. The final phases (3-
38-1 and 3-38-3)will be coordinated with the Imperial Highway, Smart Street project and will
extend from Beach Boulevard. This work is needed to upgrade and improve a deficient sewer
which was identified on the 1989 Master Plan. The following is a summary of the contract
amount:
Original Contract Amount: $ 1,091,753.00
Previously Authorized Changes: $ 0.00
Amount of Change Order No. 1(Add)(Dedeet) $ 45,255.68
Amount of Change Order No. 2(Add)(Deducq $ (32.126.00)
Amended Contract Price: $ 1.104.882.68
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 1, for seven items of additional work for an
addition of$45.255.68 and Change Order No 2 for an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a
deduction of$32,126.00, providing a net total amount of change orders on this contract of
$13,129.68: and consideration of the resolution authorizing acceptance of the work as
complete, execution of the final Closeout Agreement, and file the Notice of Completion as
required.
JAWPDMBS9 G8 AN9 WPD
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
1 January 24, 1996 0l ORANGE COUNtY. CAUFORNIA
toBN EWS AVENUE
PA sox a121
FOUNTAIN VALLEY,EAUFORN1A W729-8127
STAFF REPORT n1410528411
DISTRICT 3
Approval of Change Order Nos. 1 and 2 to the Plans and Specifications for Improvements to
Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Phase 2
Contract No. 3-35-2
and Acceptance of Contract as Complete
Summary
In November, 1994, the Directors approved the plans and specifications for Contract No. 3-38-2,
Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, Phase 2, and divided the construction into three
phases to be built as three separate construction contracts, 3-38-1, 3-38-2 and 3-38-3.
The $1.09 million project located within the City of La Habra is the middle phase and had to be
completed first because of the highway widening along Beach Boulevard. The final phase will be
coordinated with the Imperial Highway, Smart Street project and will extend from Beach
Boulevard. This work is needed to upgrade and improve a deficient sewer which was identified
on the 1989 Master Plan. The first phase of construction is now complete.
(1) Change Order No. 1
Change Order No. 1 is an addition of$45,255.68 to the contract for seven items of added work
and no calendar day time extension. This project, designed by Boyle Engineering, was awarded
to Calfon Construction in May 1995.
Item 1, in the amount of$4,559.01 was for undisclosed telephone lines. Item 2, in the amount of
$4,484.66 was for concrete encasement of existing storm drains. Item 3, in the amount of
$8,141.03 was for undisclosed abandoned pavement which had to be removed. Item 4, in the
amount of$294.74 was for connection to an 8-inch lateral. Item 5, in the amount of$5,706.83
was for encasement of an 8-inch lateral crossing Beach Boulevard (a designated State Highway).
Item 6, in the amount of$19,928.51 was for the adjustment of seven manholes on our existing
24-inch trunk sewer along Beach Boulevard. Item 7, in the amount of$2,140.90 was for a
construction conflict with General Telephone and Electric, in which the Contractor was
compensated for time he was unable to work (standby time).
(2) Change Order No. 2
Change Order No. 2 is the Adjustment of Engineer's Quantities for a net deduction of
$32,126.00.
B
If the Directors approve these change orders, the total cost of the change orders to date on this
contract will be $13,129.68. This represents an increase of 0.1% over the original contract
amount. The changes above would have been included in the original design if discovered or
known in the design phase. The Liquidated Damages on this contract are $1,000.00 per day.
These changes resulted in no time extension to the contract work schedule and therefore no
Liquidated Damages are assessed.
(3) Acceptance of Contract as Complete
Calfon Construction, Inc. has fulfilled all contractual obligations within the specified time.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 1 for an addition of$45,255,69 and Change
Order No. 2 for an Adjustment of Engineer's Quantities for a deduction of$32,126.00 with Calfon
Construction, Inc., increasing the amount of change orders on this contract to $13,129.68 which
increased the original contract amount of$1,091,753.00 to $1,104,882.68; and consideration of
the resolution authorizing acceptance of the work as complete, execution of the final Closeout
Agreement and filing of the Notice of Completion as required.
DC:Idh
EN GWGRRPTSISR01-01.96
Page 1 of 5
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Calfon Construction Inc. C.O. No.: One (1)
Date: January 4, 1996
Job No. : Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer. Phase 2 Contract No. 3-38-2
Consultant: Boyle Engineering
Amount of this Change Order(Add)(Dednet) $45,255.68
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract
work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or
deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
ITEM 1 -UNDISCLOSED TELEPHONE LINES
The plans at Station 153+92 show a abandoned 64nch steel pipe oil line that crosses the sewer alignment.
When the Contractor exposed the line it was discovered that there were telephone lines inside the abandoned
64nch oil line. The Contractor was directed to shore up the oil line for Chevron Oil to cut the pipe and remove it
This item was performed on a direct cost plus a percentage basis in accordance with General Provisions Section
10-6(B)2(b). Reference FCO#1.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $4,559.01
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 2-ENCASEMENT OF STORM DRAINS
Encasement of storm drains at Stations 145+86, 144+82 and 152+50. At three locations three storm drains and
24-inch corrugated metal pipes crossed the trunk sewer trench dudng trenching. When they were exposed it was
discovered that these drains were totally corroded. Caltrans requested the encasement of these storm drains at
these locations,so the Contractor was directed to encase these storm drains with concrete to avoid future soil
erosion in the pipe trench and future settlement of the street This item was performed on a negotiated basis in
accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6(8)2(b). Reference FCO#2.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $4,484.66
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 3-ABANDONED PAVEMENT
Between Stations 119+70 to 121+75, 144+75 to 146+75 and Stations 154+00 to 156+75,the Contractor
encountered part of an abandoned asphalt street,6-inches thick and six-feet wide. The pavement was 2-feet 6-
inches below the existing grade. This was not indicated on the plans. The Contractor was directed to excavate
and haul away approximately 680-feet of pavement sections. This Rem was performed on a direct cost plus a
percentage basis in accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6(8)2(b). Reference FCO#3
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $8,141.03
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Page 2 of 5
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728.8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Calfon Construction Inc. C.O. No.: One (1)
Date: January 4. 1996
Job No. : Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, Phase 2 Contract No. 3-38-2
Consultant: Boyle Engineering
REM 4-84NCH LATERAL CONNECTION
At Stations 149+51 plans required an 84nch connection to a manhole. When the Contractor excavated the
existing 8-inoh pipe it was found that the elevation of the B-inch pipe was appronmately 304nchos lower than it was
shown on the plans. To make up the elevation difference the Contractor was directed to excavate the pipe an
additional 50-feet until the proper elevation was reached. As a result this connection also required additional
piping. This hem was performed on a Force Account basis in accordance with General Provisions Section to-
6(B)l(b). Reference FCO#5.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $294.74
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
REM 5-84NCH LATERAL ACROSS BEACH BOULEVARD
At Station 154+26.46 plans showed an 84nch lateral connection across Beach Boulevard to an 84-inch manhole.
Per Caltrans requirements all pipes crossing Beach Boulevard(which is officially designated a State Highway)
must be encased in reinforced concrete. On the plans at this crossing concrete encasement was not shown. The
Contractor was instructed to encase this 8-inch lateral across Beach Boulevard in reinforced concrete. This hem
was performed on direct cost plus a percentage basis in accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6(b)2(b).
Reference FCO#6.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $5,706.83
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
REM 6-ADJUSTMENT OF MANHOLES ALONG BEACH BOULEVARD
Caltrans had planned to widen Beach Boulevard through the same area as Districts Contract No.3.38-2.
Caltrans schedule called for construction to start in early May 1995. This time frame conflicted with the Districts
construction schedule. After negotiations Caltrans agreed to delay their start date. At this time Caltrans requested
the adjustment of the manholes on our existing 24-4nch trunk sewer along the east shoulder of Beach Boulevard.
This trunk sewer was constructed under Contract No. 3-10. There were seven manholes on this 24-inch trunk
line,eighteen to twenty four inches above the existing grade. In order not to delay the Caltrans widening project
any further,the Contractor was directed to adjust the manhole heights to grade while hems still on the project.
This Rem was performed on direct cost plus and a percentage basis in accordance with General Provisions
Section I M(8)2(b). Reference FCO#6.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $19,928.51
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER REM: 0 Calendar Days
Page 3 of 5
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor Callon Construction Inc. C.O. No.: One (1)
Date: January 4. 1996
Job No. : Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, Phase 2 Contract No. 3-38-2
Consultant: Boyle Engineering
ITEM 7- CONSTRUCTION CONFLICT WITH GENERAL TELEPHONE AND ELECTRIC
General Telephone and Electric(GTE) had planned to lay fiber optic cable between Hillsborough Drive
and Imperial Highway in La Habra on the west shoulder of Beach Boulevard along the same route as
Contract
No. 3-38-2. This schedule conflict with GTE was resolved with the understanding that GTE would
coordinate their construction activities and give a two day advance notice through the City of La Habra.
This would ensure the timely completion of both projects and minimize the construction conflict. On
July 26, 1996, GTE 's Contractor Arizona Pipeline arrived at the job site without advance notification
and unloaded their construction materials where our Contractor(Callon) had already mobilized for the
compaction of the trench. GTE had failed to coordinate the job and had not notified the City or the
Districts. After discussions between GTE, the City and the Districts the Contractor(Arizona Pipeline)
moved to the north end of Beach Boulevard by Imperial Highway, which took one day. During this time
the Districts Contractor was notable to work as scheduled. It was agreed that the Contractor would be
compensated for this time. This item was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with General
Provisions Section 10-6. Reference FCO*7.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $2.140.90
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $45,255.68
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days
Page 4 of 5
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10544 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728.8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Calfon Construction Inc. C.O. No.: One (1)
Date: January 4. 1996
Job No. : Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, Phase 2 Contract No. 3-38-2
Consultant: Boyle Engineering
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work
and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by
this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that there is no extension
of time required for this Change Order, but that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs,
expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted
and approve by this Change Order.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Dale: May 1, 1995
Original Contract Time: 150 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date: July 28, 1995
Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension: 0 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time: 150 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date: Not Applicable
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable
Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable
Original Contract Price $1,091,753.00
Prev. Authorized Changes $ 0.00
This Change (Add) (Bedeet) $ 45,255.68
Amended Contract Price $ 1,137,008.68
Pape 5 of 5
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
109" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-0127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Califon Construction Inc. C.O. No.: One (1)
Date: January 4. 1996
Job No. : Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer. Phase 2 Contract No. 3738-2
Consultant: Boyle Ennineerina
PDC Authoriza0on Date: January 4, 1996
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Subm R ended
7K IZ 7 5 L —9.T
ngineering Construction Manager Date
pprov d // Approved as to Form:
V r
Director of Engineering Date GenAkal Counsel Date
Accepted by:
CALF N CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Contractor Date
' Page 1 of 3
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Calfon Construction Inc. C.O. No.: Two (2)
Date: January 4. 1996
Job: Improvements to Miller-Holder Truck Sewer System, Reach 2. (5,800 feel North of
Rosecrans Avenue to Imperial Highway), Contract No. 3-38-2
Consultant: Boyle Engineering Corporation
Amount of this Change Order(Add)(Deduct) $(32.126.00)
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract
work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or
deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
ITEM 1 -ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S QUANTITIES
ADD: Change in Quantity
Item No. Unit Description From To Difference Unit Price Total
7. V.F. 84-inch Concrete 103.00 109.50 6.50 $1462.00 $9,503.00
Manhole
SUBTOTAL: $9,503.00
DEDUCT: Change in Quantity
Item No. Unit Description From To Difference Unit Price Total
13. L.F. Removal of 100.00 93.71 6.29 $ 100.00 $ (629.00)
Contaminated Soil
14. L.F. Removal of 100.00 0.00 100.00 $ 100.00 $(10,000.00)
Contaminated Soil
15. L.F. Removal of 100.00 0.00 100.00 $ 100.00 $(10,000.00)
Contaminated Soil
16. C.Y. Crushed Rock 500.00 0.00 500.00 $ 20.00 $(10,000.00)
17. C.Y. Crushed Rock 500.00 0.00 500.00 $ 22.00 $(11,000.00)
SUBTOTAL: $(41,629.00)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER REM: $(41,629.00)
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $(32,126.00)
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days
Page 2 of 3
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Calton Construction Inc. C.O. No.: Two (2)
Date: January 4. 1996
Job: Improvements to Miller-Holder Truck Sewer System, Reach 2. (5,800 feet North of
Rosecrans Avenue to Imperial Highway), Contract No. 3-38-2
Consultant: Boyle Engineering Corporation
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work
and within the time within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract
time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time
for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or
damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except, as expressly granted and approved by
this Change Order.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date: May 1, 1995
Original Contract Time: 150 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date: July 28, 1995
Time Extension this C.O.: 0 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension: 0 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time: 150 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date: Not Applicable
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable
Actual Final Completion Date: N/A
Original Contract Price $ 1,091,753.00
Prev. Authorized Changes $ 45,255.68
This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ (32,126.00)
Amended Contract Price $ 1,104,882.68
Page 3 of 3
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Callon Construction Inc. C.O. No.: Two(2)
Date: January 4. 1996
Job: Improvements to Miller-Holder Truck Sewer. Phase 2. Contract No. 3-38-2
Consultant: BWe Engineering Corporation
PDC Authorization Date: January 4, 1995
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
S mute by: Re ended b
'Engineering Manager Date construction Manager Date
ppro a Ap v d 22 to F
Director of Engineering Date General ounsel Date
Accepted by:
CALFO YCONSTRUCTION INC.
'CroMractor Date
S�
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
MEETING
AGENDAFOR
JANUARY 24, 1996
Item (11)(a): Minutes of the Executive Committee
Summary
(1) Receive and file draft Ad Hoc Committee re Landfill Acquisition Minutes forth e meetings held
December 13, 1995, December 27, 1995,January 10, 1996 and January 17, 1996.
(2) Receive and file draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on December 13, 1995.
(3) Receive and file draft Minutes of Operations,Maintenance, and Technical Services Committee for
the meeting held on January 3, 1996.
(4) Receive and file draft Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization Study Committee Minutes for the
meetings held on January 4, 1996.
(5) Receive and file draft Minutes of Planning, Design and Construction Committee for the meeting
held on January 4, 1996.
(6) Receive and file draft Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the
meeting held on January 10, 1996.
(6) Receive and file draft Executive Committee Minutes for the meeting held on January 17, 1996.
Summary
See attached minutes.
Executive Committee Recommendation to the Joint Boards of Directors
Receive and file minutes listed above.
11N9e'Jg9SWG�1IRM'811A NTD
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County,California
P.O.Box 8127 • 10544 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley,CA 9272"127
Telephone: (714)962-2411
DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE AD HOC COMMITTEE
RE LANDFILL ISSUES
Wednesday, December 13, 1995 at 4 p.m.
A meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee re Landfill Issues of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,
2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11. 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Wednesday,
December 13, 1995 at 4 p.m., at the Districts'Administrative Office.
(1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
AD HOC COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT:
Present: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel
John Scholz, Saybrook Capital
John Cox, Joint Chair Carolyn Nash, Councilmember, San Juan
Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair Capistrano
Pat McGuigan Ellen LaPointe, League of California Cities,
John Collins Orange County Division
Sal Sapien
Don R. Griffin STAFF PRESENT:
George Brown
Sheldon Singer Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager
Blake P. Anderson, Chief Operations Officer
Judith A. Wilson, Chief Administrative Officer
Absent: Michelle Tuchman, Communications Manager
Steve Kozak, Financial Manager
John Gullixson Mike Moore, Senior Regulatory Specialist
Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary
(2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no comments by any member of the public.
Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee
re Landfill Issues
Page 2
December 13, 1995
(4) APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re Landfill Issues held on November 15, 1995 were
approved as drafted.
(5) REPORTS OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR. GENERAL MANAGER AND GENERAL
COUNSEL
(a) There was no report by the Committee Chair.
(b) There was no report by the General Manager.
(c) There was no report by General Counsel.
(6) DISCUSSION OF LANDFILL ISSUES
Blake Anderson, Chief Operations Officer, discussed the process re Proposed Acquisition of
County Solid Waste Management System, outlined in a handout (copy attached to the
minutes). The Board of Supervisors accepted our Letter of Interest at their December 5,
1995 meeting,which started the 75-day negotiating period. Day 75 is February 18, 1996.
The Board of Supervisors will consider any offer we make on February 27, 1996.
Staff recommended that 1) Board of Supervisors request initiation of LAFCO proceedings; 2)
authorization to engage bond counsel; and 3) authorization to engage financial manager.
After discussion, staff was directed to delay engaging bond counsel and a financial manager
at this time.
The staffs of both agencies are working together exchanging information. Both agencies will
use discounted cash flow value for determining a value of the landfill system and will share
assumptions used in reaching a number.
The question of when an offer is made was discussed. By making an offer as soon as
possible, it can be determined whether or not the offer is in the same ballpark. Staff
indicated that it would prefer to wait until a draft tern sheet has been approved at the
January 24 meeting of the Boards, because the work by Ernst& Young will be completed
and the valuation work by PriceWaterhouse will be completed for us. Before that, the term
sheet will be drafted and presented to the Directors at the January 24 Board meeting when a
determination can be made re when and who and how to hand the money to the County;
commit to host cities' MOUs; determine indemnification strategy; draft price and down
payment; establish refunding strategy of the County's existing $80MM debt; establish the
feasibility of dropping the tipping fees, and complete draft terms of employee acquisition for
235+ employees now working for IWMD.
w
Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee
re Landfill Issues
Page 3
December 13, 1995
If at the end of 75 days an agreement is reached, it will take a minimum of an additional 60
days to complete the LAFCO process and actually form the new Sanitation District. It is
anticipated that between June 1 and July 1, the Districts could commence operating the
landfill given that all of our fast-track efforts are not interrupted!
The issue of Flow control was discussed. The LAFCO application will include a three-year
service plan and we will describe what flow control will look like. Director Collins expressed
concern about the Districts being able to meet flow control because of pricing pressure being
placed on the cities from other landfills outside of the county. Before any further steps are
taken, the flow control number should be determined. Staff was directed to meet with the
cities and the haulers to develop accurate flow control numbers. Agendas for some city
council meetings for the first part of January are already set, so staff will be hard pressed to
meet with all of them by the end of January. The General Manager will meet with city
managers and with as many haulers as possible to get their buy-in, if possible.
Any offer that the Districts extend to the County will have to address flow control, either in the
agreement or as a contingency, to an agreement.
The three options available to the County at this time are: 1) status quo; 2) form a new
Sanitation District and include all the cities and sanitary districts; 3) sell to the highest bidder.
Director Griffith suggested that we should be developing an approach by letting staff work on
this and meet with other agencies to start building consensus. This will build a basis to
prepare a reasonable offer which we could stand by.
Director Collins asked that we make sure any application is submitted according to state and
federal law, and asked General Counsel to address specifics regarding environmental and
legal liability issues, both now and in the future, on the part of cities.
After much discussion, the Ad Hoc Committee voted (6 ayes, 1 no with Director McGuigan
abstaining) to seek authorization from the Boards of Directors at the December 13, 1995
meeting to make an offer and direct staff to develop deal points for review by the Ad Hoc
Committee meeting (tentatively scheduled for December 27) and a final report to special
meeting of the Joint Boards on January 3, 1996.
Blake briefly reported on the bankruptcy. It appears that a joint agreement may be out next
week. If the agreement is ready, a special meeting of the Joint Boards of Directors may be
scheduled for January 3 to consider it.
(7) CLOSED SESSION
There was no need for a Closed Session.
(8) OTHER BUSINESS
Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee Y
re Landfill Issues
Page 4
December 13, 1995
There was no other business discussed.
(9) MATTERS TO BE REPORTED ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING
There were no matters to be reported on at a subsequent meeting.
(10) MATTERS ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT.
There were no matters addressed.
(11) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING
The next Ad Hoc Committee meeting has been tentatively scheduled for December 27, 1995 at
5:30 p.m.
(12) ADJOURNMENT
The Ad Hoc Committee adjourned at approximately 5:45 p.m.
Submitted by:
Jean Tappan, Secretary
.i:W000acnn NMOMoxo 1121a M1N
-•ti County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County,California
P.O.Box 8127 • 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127
Telephone: (714)962-2411
DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE AD HOC COMMITTEE
RE LANDFILL ISSUES
Wednesday, December 27, 1995 at 5:30 p.m.
A meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee re Landfill Issues of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,
2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Wednesday, December 27,
1995 at 5:30 p.m., at the Districts'Administrative Office.
(1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
AD HOC COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT:
Present: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel
John Scholz, Saybrook Capital
John Cox,Joint Chair Rebecca Casey, Saybrook Capital
Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair Michael Ozawa, Price Waterhouse
Pat McGuigan Michelle Leonard, Clements Environmental
John Collins
Sal Sapien STAFF PRESENT:
John Gullixson
George Brown Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager
Sheldon Singer Blake P. Anderson, Chief Operations Officer
Michelle Tuchman, Communications Manager
Steve Kozak, Financial Manager
Absent: Covina Chaudhry, Committee Secretary
Don R. Griffin
Carolyn Nash, Councilmember, San Juan
Capistrano
(2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no comments by any member of the public.
Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee
re Landfill Issues
Page 2
December27, 1995
(4) APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re Landfill Issues held on December 13, 1995 were
approved as drafted.
(5) REPORTS OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR, GENERAL MANAGER AND GENERAL
COUNSEL
(a) There was no report by the Committee Chair.
(b) Report by the General Manager:
Don McIntyre discussed a video regarding Flow control, which was made by the
County about 2 or 3 years ago. It was suggested that with simply re-dubbing portions
of the video we could quickly and inexpensively produce an information video which
could be used as a tool in presenting information about the importance of flow control.
Don asked the committee whether they had any feedback from the cities regarding
the second letter that was sent out to the city managers. It was noted that the lack of
response to the Districts' letter could be due to holiday shutdowns.
Don distributed a copy of the "Pringle press release"which proposes the
consolidation of all water and sewer districts of this county. Don felt that on the
surface, it had a lot of appeal and that it should be of serious interest to all of us. The
actual bill should be coming out around January 3, therefore, a copy will be provided
to all members before the next Joint Board meeting on January 24, 1996. It was
suggested that a letter, itemizing at least five good issues and signed by John Cox,
should be forwarded to our State Senators.
Don mentioned that there was an error on the second page and in the second
paragraph of the Agenda report. The date was given as January 27. The date should
have been December 27.
(c) Report by General Counsel.
Tom Woodruff addressed the issues of liabilities in purchasing the landfills and also
the ability to raise fees as a new sanitation district. Tom discussed the potential
liabilities of running a landfill. Tom discussed the issue that there are 21 closed
landfill sites, and we don't really know the exact status of all of these landfills. Tom
mentioned that for us to buy the landfills, the County is also going to want us to take
the liabilities.
A best-case/worse-case scenario was brought forth. The best-case scenario would be
about$300 thousand. The worse-case scenario would be$20 million, which comes
out to approximately$1 million per site. This would include the installation of
r
Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee
re Landfill Issues
Page 3
December 27, 1995
monitoring wells to search for gas and water contamination and anything else that
might be reasonably expected or unexpected.
The question was brought up by several members as to whether the County can totally
absolve themselves from all liabilities once the landfills are sold. Tom said that the
County probably couldn't absolve themselves from liability due to environmental laws,
but that we would probably indemnify them. It was staled that the liability issue is still
an unknown and that a couple of the landfills have yet to be tested. It was mentioned
that general liability insurance could be bought for about $200 thousand a year for
about$10 million coverage.
Tom mentioned that there would be 36 seats, which includes 4 sanitary districts, on the
new sanitation district board. Don brought up the fact that some cities feel they should
hold more than one seat due to their size; however, all we are doing at this time is
complying with what the stale law says.
Chair, John Cox, mentioned that maybe we could make a statement; that we, under the
new sanitation districts' operation, would have a better chance of protecting ourselves
from liabilities, and that being governed by 36 different directors (one from each dty
and one from each of the sanitary districts) would put us in better control of our destiny.
(6) DISCUSSION OF LANDFILL ISSUES
Blake Anderson, Chief Operations Officer, summarized the process re Proposed Acquisition of
County Solid Waste Management System, outlined in the Agenda package.
Blake mentioned that staff and our consultants had been meeting with IWMD on a daily basis
since the December 13 meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee re Landfill Issues, and that on
December 19, Ernst & Young, the consultants, IWMD, and Sanitation Districts staff had met to
kick off the formal valuation process.
Blake summarized the items listed on the agenda package regarding Valuation, Governance
and LAFCO, City and Wastehauler Outreach/Reaction, and the Staffing transition plan.
(7) CLOSED SESSION
Discussion regarding valuation was discussed in closed session. Following a presentation by
our consultants, the committee determined that it was not yet prepared to make a
recommendation of value until additional due diligence has been completed. As a result of a
decision made by the Ad Hoc Committee re Landfill Issues at this meeting, it will not be
necessary for the Joint Boards to meet on January 3, 1996, as previously proposed.
(8) OTHER BUSINESS
There was no other business discussed.
V
Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee
re Landfill Issues
Page 4
December 27, 1995
(9) MATTERS TO BE REPORTED ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING
There were no matters to be reported on at a subsequent meeting.
(10) MATTERS ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT.
There were no matters addressed.
(11) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING
The next Ad Hoc Committee meeting has been tentatively scheduled for January 10, 1996 at
7:00 p.m.
(12) ADJOURNMENT
The Ad Hoc Committee adjourned at approximately 7:20 p.m.
Submitted by:
Corina Chaudhry, Secretary
JAWVOIX.YaMNNi LLl oHOP8NIV78 MIN
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County,California
P.O.Box 8127 • 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127
Telephone: (714)962-2411
DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE AD HOC COMMITTEE
RE LANDFILL ISSUES
Wednesday, January 10, 1996 at 7 p.m.
A meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee re Landfill Issues of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,
2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Wednesday, January 10,
1996, starting at 7:10 p.m., at the Districts'Administrative Office.
(1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
AD HOC COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT:
Present: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel
Chip Clements, Clements Environmental
John Cox, Joint Chair John Scholz, Saybrook Capital
Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair Michael Ozawa, PriceWaterhouse
Pat McGuigan Sara Anderson, Planning Solutions
John Collins
Don R. Griffin
John Gullixson STAFF PRESENT:
George Brown
Sal Sapien Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager
Sheldon Singer Blake P. Anderson, Chief Operations Officer
Carolyn Nash, Councilmember, San Juan Judith A. Wilson, Chief Administrative Officer
Capistrano Michelle Tuchman, Communications Manager
Steve Kozak, Financial Manager
Absent: Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary
Terri Josway, Safety and Health Manager
Greg Mathews, Principal Administrative Analyst
Mike Peterman, Human Resources Analyst
Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Mike White, Controller
(2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no comments by any member of the public.
Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee
re Landfill Issues
Page 2
January 10, 1996
(4) APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re Landfill Issues held on December 27, 1995 were
approved as drafted.
(5) REPORTS OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR, GENERAL MANAGER AND GENERAL
COUNSEL
(a) There was no report by the Committee Chair.
(b) There was no report by the General Manager.
(c) There was no report by General Counsel.
(6) DISCUSSION OF LANDFILL ISSUES
Staff, consultants and the Ad Hoc Committee members continued evaluating the results of
the due diligence. On Friday, January 12, Ernst &Young will be presenting their valuation
numbers to the County, one using discounted cash Flow and actual spending, and one using
market based numbers. It is anticipated that there will be a wide range of valuation based on
these approaches. Price Waterhouse, on our behalf, is attempting to develop a valuation
approach that reflects what we can reasonable anticipate. Some of their assumptions will
rely upon the operating philosophy that we are willing to embrace.
A fact sheet (copy attached)was discussed which outlined trash volume and trash revenues,
costs of operating the system, and what the cost of individual expenses would have to be to
meet a tipping fee of$30 per ton. The numbers are based on rough assumptions in order to
determine how much we can afford to pay for the landfill system.
The key factor is flow control, and in order to ensure flow control all, or virtually all, cities
must be a part of the system. Staff will continue to meet with the cities to determine the level
of support. General Counsel Tom Woodruff is meeting with the City Attorneys Thursday
noon, and staff is making a presentation at the League of California Cities—Orange County
Division meeting Thursday night.
February 18 is the date the term sheet is due to the County. There will be a special Joint
Boards Meeting on February 14, 1996 to consider the term sheet. This will be a highly
qualified document. After that, there will be a 60-day final due diligence period, and the offer
could be pulled or modified if the conditions of the term sheet fail to adequately materialize,
or support from the Cities does not warrant pursuing the purchase.
Director Singer suggested that staff continue to meet with specific wastehauler interests to
get their support. The General Manager indicated that he has met with several of them and
one has indicated an interest in buying the Brea-Olinda landfill with the help of the ten
northern cities.
Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee
re Landfill Issues
Page 3
January 10, 1996
At this time the County has five alternatives:
1. Status quo.
2. Purchase by the Sanitation Districts.
3. One or more JPAs, organized around one or more of the landfills.
4. Privatization (ownership and governance).
5. Out of County options.
Director Griffin mentioned that staff should be looking at the strategy of building confidence
with local cities and answering their questions regarding the ability to develop the necessary
flow control. Staff should begin looking at policy issues that build on the essence of our
existing organizational philosophy in guiding how this new organization should be managed
and operated. Additional items to be addressed would be how increases in costs would be
handled, and assure the potential members of the fairness of the system.
The issue of AB939 flow reduction was also discussed. This should reduce the amount of
flow into the landfills and is included in the consultants' model.
The reasons to get into the solid waste business were mentioned by Chair Cox. We have a
greater potential to operate the system more efficiently and therefore keep the rates down, as
well as helping the County get out of bankruptcy more quickly.
Councilmember Nash commented about the support from the southern cities. She indicated
that they are more likely to support the proposed system than to continue with the County.
They, too, are concerned about flow control.
To date, according to the General Manager, the only two cities that have expressed concerns
directly to him about the proposed purchase are Huntington Beach and Anaheim. Staff has
had several meetings with them to address their concerns.
Director Sapien mentioned that if the County continues to operate the landfills, we all run the
risk of facing higher tipping fees, landfill closures, and no flow control.
General Counsel addressed the issues raised in meetings he attended; mainly, indemnity
against liability. As environmental law has proven, cities have a liability for any and all
landfills they use. We have the ability, and it is his recommendation to indemnify the singular
liability of each city and to use a unified legal strategy.
Director Swan suggested that we consider using a parcel fee to pay for those existing
county-wide programs that are not related directly to the operation or construction of the
landfills. The $6 million per year for the household hazardous waste program and other
costs ought to be attached to a user fee on the property bills. There could be residential and
commercial rates. General Counsel indicated that under the Sanitation Districts Act this is a
possibility.
Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee
re Landfill Issues
Page 4
January 10, 199E
The General Manager said that any increase in debt service must allow for decrease in
operating funds. At an assumed operating cost of$12 per ton, that could present a
challenge.
Director Collins expressed concem about the assumptions presented by staff, the flow
control issue and the need to give something to the cities in return for their support.
Blake Anderson indicated that the Districts do not operate the same way as the County and
that we should be able to cut costs significantty. However, the costs during a transition
period were discussed. These could be significant and have not yet been carefully reviewed.
Judy Wilson asked the consultants to prepare additional models using different transition
assumptions. Chip Clements indicated that he will get additional supporting documentation
from those landfills that are operating at $12 per ton for the next meeting. The County has
been unable to provide the exact operations and maintenance number it costs them on a per
ton basis.
Director Cox indicated that we should still continue forward with the due diligence. There are
30 days remaining before the term sheet is due. One of the most important things is to get
the support of the cities.
General Counsel discussed the draft agreement (copy attached) he has prepared for"District
99", as the new entity has been designated. The agreement provides that this District will
defend any claim arising out of the operation of the landfill on behalf of the cities. None of
the member cities would have any liability just because they are a member. The cities must
agree to send 100% of their non-recyclables and the "District"will provide capacity for landfill
space. Other things of concern are covered by state code.
Because it will lake some time to build up liability reserves, there is the possibility of
purchasing insurance to provide adequate coverage. There are other major issues not
addressed in the agreement and are detailed in a separate document(copy attached).
Director Sapien asked that the transition costs be provided at the next meeting.
Director Griffin mentioned that in his opinion support must be forthcoming from 100% of the
cities to assure equitable treatment and sufficient county-wide buy-in. He also asked for a
better explanation of the assumptions used in developing the numbers. He would like to
better understand what they are. He also mentioned that staff should emphasize the policy
advantages of the program with the cities, not just the numbers.
Chair Cox stated that because we continue to gather more information, another meeting will
be held Wednesday, January 17, after the Executive Committee meeting. By then the
numbers from Emst& Young should be available, and the cities' reactions to our
presentations will also be known.
Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee
re Landfill Issues
Page 5
January 10, 1996
(7) CLOSED SESSION
There was no closed session.
(8) OTHER BUSINESS
There was no other business discussed.
(9) MATTERS TO BE REPORTED ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING
There were no other matters to be reported on at a subsequent meeting.
(10) MATTERS ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT.
There were no matters addressed.
(11) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING
The next Ad Hoc Committee meeting has been tentatively scheduled for January 17, 1996 at
7 p.m.
(12) ADJOURNMENT
The Ad Hoc Committee adjourned at 9:04 p.m.
Submitted by:
Jean Tappan, Secretary
JAW GM NG LNOXOLI lIM MIN
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County,California
P.O. Box 8127 • 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127
Telephone: (714)962-2411
DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE AD HOC COMMITTEE
RE LANDFILL ACQUISITION
Wednesday, January 17, 1995 at 7 p.m.
A meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee re Landfill Acquisition of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,
2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Wednesday, January 17, 1995
at 7:30 p.m., at the Districts'Administrative Office.
The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
AD HOC COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT:
Present: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel
Carolyn Nash, Councilmember, San Juan
John Cox, Joint Chair Capistrano
Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair John Scholz, Saybrook Capital
Pat McGuigan, Chair, District 1 Rebecca Casey, Saybrook Capital
John Collins, Chair, District 2 Michael Ozawa, Price Waterhouse
Sal Sapien, Chair, District 3 Bernie Burk, Price Waterhouse
Don Griffin, Past Joint Chair Sara Anderson, Planning Solutions
George Brown, Chair, FAHR Committee
Sheldon Singer, Chair pro tem, PDC Committee
Absent: STAFF PRESENT:
John Gullixson, Chair, District 13 Don McIntyre, General Manager
Blake Anderson, Chief Operations Officer
Judy Wilson, Chief Administrative Officer
Steve Kozak, Financial Manager
Michelle Tuchman, Communications Director
Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary
(2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
(3) PUBLICCOMMENTS
There were no comments by any member of the public.
Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re
Landfill Acquisition
Page 2
January 17, 1996
(4) APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re Landfill Issues held on were approved as revised.
(5) REPORTS OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR GENERAL MANAGER AND GENERAL COUNSEL
(a) There was no report by the Committee Chair.
(b) There was no report by the General Manager.
(c) There was no report by General Counsel.
(6) DISCUSSION OF LANDFILL ISSUES
Staff, consultants and the Ad Hoc Committee members continued evaluating the results of the
due diligence. On Friday, January 12, Ernst & Young was scheduled to present their valuation
numbers to the County, however, this did not happen. The numbers are now due Friday,
January 19.
Chip Clements is continuing to poll landfill operations to determine operating cost-per-ton
numbers. LA San is operating at$10.50 per ton; Sacramento Regional is between $12.75 and
$14.85 per ton; Venture Regional is at$10.30 per ton. It appears, though getting the right
information is proving difficult, that Orange County is about $18 per ton, or$16 per ton without
some of the administrative cost burden imposed by the County.
Blake mentioned that the County of Riverside Board of Supervisors had the first reading of an
ordinance lowering the tipping fee from $35 per ton to$30 per ton effective July 1, 1996. We
are seeing more bleed off of Orange County to our neighbors because of the new contracts. It
is likely that both Riverside and San Bernardino Counties will lower their tipping fees to$30 to
try to keep their solid waste in their own county.
Other issues discussed were vacating existing MOUs, downsizing, and privatizing some
aspects of the system. Blake visited three landfills in San Bernardino County that were
privatized. They were originally owned and operated by the County.
The consultants presented preliminary numbers using tipping fees of$30 and $35 per ton to
help determine a present value to use in establishing an offer. The costs for both closed and
active sites need to be refined; there are some variable costs and some fixed costs that are not
yet known.
Another item that must be determined are the number of County full-time equivalents (FTEs)
employees that are supporting the landfill system, but not working directly for the IWMD. EMA,
GSA, sheriffs and others charge time to IWMD. This information has been requested by
LAFCO.
Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re
Landfill Acquisition
Page 3
January 17, 1995
Based on the scenario presented by the consultants, Chair Cox indicated that it appeared the
deal could work at$12 to $13 operating cost. The consultants were directed to provide
numbers based on $14, $15 and $16 as well. A key issue is what can be done to reduce the
operating cost and how long it would take to put those actions in place.
Another key factor is flow control, and in order to ensure flow control all, or virtually all, cities
must be a part of the system. Staff is presently using a 90% figure as their model. The cities
will need incentives to buy into this project. Director Swan indicated that if we put the costs of
operating the landfills onto the property tax bill, the tipping fee can immediately be reduced and
the cities would see a benefit. We would then have one of the lowest price tipping fees in the
state and flow control wouldn't be a problem. We would be charging a "true gate fee.' Other
directors advised considerable caution in applying a parcel fee county-wide because of the
backlash it could create.
Director Sapien would like to see what it costs the County to operate the landfills, and what is it
going to take for us to reduce it down to the $12-$13/ton range, and what happens if we are not
able to reduce the operating cost. He suggested that perhaps the value should be placed on
some realistic number, closer to $17, which is closer to toda,/s actual cost.
At the next meeting the consultants will provide printouts of various scenarios that outline this
information. Based on these numbers the Committee then can decide whether it is feasible to
make a deal or not. What matters is what can be done from an operating standpoint to reduce
costs, and whether we can get below$16 per ton operating costs.
There is a possibility that costs could increase in the next couple of years depending on
variable or fixed costs.
Director Sapien asked how we would go about securing flow. Staff responded that a letter is
being sent to all city managers tomorrow which will include a draft flow control agreement,
executive summary and a time table, and encourage the city managers to get the issue before
their councils.
Councilperson Nash sent faxes to all south County cities stating it was now time to address this
issue. Staff will continue to meet vrith the cities to determine the level of support; hopefully we
will know by the end of February how much support there is. Several members of the
Committee mentioned that the cities will not support this issue until they have more information
and specifics, such as anticipated lipping fees and how long do they have to sign up for—
present and future.
The issues to be considered is to establish a value, then decide how to entice the cities to go
along with the program to ensure flow control, and then figure out how to negotiate with the
County. Visits need to be paid to each supervisor so that they understand what the proposal
does for everyone. Don and Blake are planning to do the rounds next week.
(7) CLOSED SESSION
There was no closed session.
D
Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re
Landfill Acquisition
Page 4
January 17, 1996
(8) OTHER BUSINESS
At next Wednesday night's Joint Boards meeting there is going to be a resolution for
everyone's consideration which requests that the County Board of Supervisors adopt a
resolution urging LAFCO to initiate the proceedings. This is a protocol provided under the
Cortese-Knox to get a new district formed. The Ad Hoc Committee previously stated that it
wanted to review the application before it is filed; however, LAFCO is now willing to take the
material in parts in order to move the process along. The Ad Hoc Committee agreed to this
change. At any time prior to the application going to the Board of Equalization it can be pulled
If the Directors determine there may be a problem.
(9) MATTERS TO BE REPORTED ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING
There were no other matters to be reported on at a subsequent meeting.
(10) MATTERS ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT.
There were no matters addressed.
(11) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING
The next Ad Hoc Committee meeting has been scheduled for Wednesday, January 31, 1996
at 5:30 p.m.
(12) ADJOURNMENT
The Ad Hoc Committee adjourned at 8:40 p.m.
Submitted by:
Jean Tappan, Secretary
J\WODCPG NJFUL HpP 11O MIN
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County,California
P.O. Box 8127 • 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley,CA 9272"127
Telephone: (714)962-2411
DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Wednesday, January 17, 1996 at 5:30 p.m.
A meeting of the Executive Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13
and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Wednesday, January 17, 1996 at 5:30 p.m., at the
Districts'Administrative Office.
(1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT:
Present: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel
Bob Skultety, The Gas Company
John Cox, Jr., Joint Chair
Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair STAFF PRESENT:
Pat McGuigan, Chair, District 1 and
OMTS Chair Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager
John J. Collins, Chair, District 2 and Blake P. Anderson, Chief Operations Officer
PDC Chair Judith A. Wilson, Chief Administrative Officer
George Brown, FAHR Chair Gary Hasenstab, Director of Human Resources
Sal A. Sapien, Chair, District 3 Edwin Hodges, Director of Maintenance
Jan Debay, Chair, District 5 Steve Hovey, Director of Information Technology
James Ferryman, Chair, District 6 David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Barry Hammond, Chair, District 7 Robert Cofer, Director of Operations
Victor Leipzig, Chair, District 11 Mahin Talebi, Source Control Manager
Roger Stanton, County Supervisor Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications
Don R. Griffin, Past Joint Chair Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary
Absent:
Thomas Saltarelli, Chair, District 14
William Steiner, County Supervisor
John Gullixson, Chair, District 13
Minutes of the Executive Committee
Page 2
January 17, 1996
2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no comments by any member of the public.
(4) APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of the November 8, 1995, Executive Committee meeting were approved as
corrected.
(5) REPORTS OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR, GENERAL MANAGER. AND GENERAL
COUNSEL
(a) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
The Committee Chair had no report.
(b) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
The General Manager reported that the new Grand Jury will be visiting the Districts
January 30. This is done routinely by every Grand Jury. We have received favorable
reviews by the Grand Jury in the past.
He also reminded the Directors of the Strategic Plan work shop scheduled for Saturday,
January 27 between 9 and noon, to discuss important planning issues that will affect
the direction of the Districts in the future. Jerry King, a member of the California
Regional Water Quality Control Board, will be attending. Invitations are being sent to
environmentalists, regulators and members of the business community.
On January 30, John Cox, Blake Anderson and the General Manager will be meeting
with Orange County Business Council members on the proposed landfill acquisition.
The Executive Management staff is planning a one-and one-half day retreat February 1
and 2 to determine commitments for next year's budget. Benchmarking will be used to
measure performance. After the retreat, the decisions reached will be shared with
management during the month of February.
Staff is preparing a letter of response from the Joint Chair in response to Assemblyman
Pringle's proposed legislation on special districts. A response is also being sent to
Mayor Broadwater's Letter to the Editor. This is also for the Joint Chair's signature.
9
Minutes of the Executive Committee
Page 3
January 17, 1996
At the General Manager's request, Blake Anderson updated the Executive Committee
on the bankruptcy proceedings. A Joint Agreement has been approved by the County
and the OCIP participants committee and has been submitted to all parties in the OCIP.
The FAHR Committee reviewed the agreement but asked that it be returned to the
Committee in February for additional consideration after the County's disclosure letter
and re-drafted Plan of Adjustment have been released.
Blake also updated the Executive Committee on the progress of the due diligence on
the landfills. The report on the valuation of the landfills by Ernst& Young was
supposed to be available last Friday, however, that has been moved to Friday,
January 19, according to the County. These numbers are necessary to establish a
price. The Ad Hoc Committee re Landfill Acquisition met last week and will be meeting
after the Executive Committee meeting tonight. The Ad Hoc Committee will be seeking
direction from the Boards of Directors on policy issues. At last week's meeting, staff
directed the consultants to provide several models based on various assumptions.
Blake reported that he visited three privatized landfills in San Bernardino County to see
how they operated, which was considerably different from Orange County's operation.
Director Debay said that she is serving on a task force for SCAG on landfills and it was
brought to her attention at one of the meetings that the courts have been overturning
contracts that included flow control provisions. She expressed concern about
franchise agreements that contain flow control requirements. General Counsel
indicated that the law concerning these contracts is in a state of flux right now, and this
should be considered when considering contracts. He also indicated that he met with
the County's City Attorneys last week and no one seemed to think there is a problem
with our proposal at this time. A city could make a recommendation within the
agreement as to where the flow should be sent without demanding it.
Chair Cox indicated that he made a presentation to the Orange County League of
Cities, which went well. The concems expressed were not unexpected. The amount of
support for our proposal still remains to be seen. The criticism that was heard was that
the nexus with the bankruptcy was not stressed.
(c) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
General Counsel announced that there was a supplemental agenda item that needed to
be considered by the Executive Committee. The item was received after the agenda
was mailed. The action is to consider a request for a hearing appealing an industrial
waste enforcement order against Porter Plating. The motion was made, seconded and
carried to consider the item under Item No. 14.
(6) (a) It was moved, seconded and passed that the minutes of the December 13, 1995
Steering Committee Meeting be received and filed.
e
Minutes of the Executive Committee
Page 4
January 17, 1996
(b) (1) After much discussion on the merits of the existing committee system, as well as
the problems encountered by staff in preparing for the various commitees and the
duplication of efforts, it was moved, seconded and passed to recommend to the
Joint Board that the current Committee system of three policy committees be
retained, and that the the Executive Committee meet monthly through June and
then on an as-needed basis. Staff is to continue to consider ways to streamline
the process.
The items to be addressed by the Executive Committee at this time are landfill
issues submitted to them from the Ad Hoe Committee and consolidation of the
nine districts.
Director Debay suggested that the Joint Chair invite, on a rotating basis, various
directors to attend Steering Committee meetings to help familiarize them with the
activities of that committee.
Director Sapien mentioned that he felt the existing committee structure was
cumbersome and could result in staff bumout. The committees should be dealing
with policy issues, not micro-managing. He suggested combining committees or
meeting less than monthly. He expressed concern that staff was spending more
time writing reports than managing the work and the Districts. Chair Cox
indicated that there would be savings by not submitting committee items to the
Executive Committee, but rather directly to the Joint Boards. The General
Manager also indicated that as we move towards a smaller capital program, there
will be fewer actions for the Committees to address. However, if the landfill
system is added, it would mean more meetings. He also mentioned that the
problem with meeting less than monthly is the delay in processing action items.
Director Collins stated that the Ad Hoc Committees are working well, and are
helping to specialize the committees. Policy and oversight at the committee level
is important and the Directors must pay attention to what is going on at the
Districts. The current committee structure gets the Directors involved more than
in the past.
Director Hammond stated that the committee structure is probably one of the best
things that has happened. The idea of taking some committee items directly to
the Boards is a good one. However, he questioned how individual District's items
would be handled. He indicated that there is a value in all District chairs meeting
in the same room to discuss the big policy issues.
Director McGuigan said that she appreciated being able to interact with staff and
developing a good working relationship with them through the committee
structure.
Director Griffin said that the idea of not bringing the Chairs of the Districts together
on a regular basis would result in not understanding the long view of the Districts'
Minutes of the Executive Committee
Page 5
January 17, 1996
mission and fragment what is now a coordinated Board. He suggested meeting
annual or biannually to review whether the objectives of the organization are
being met. He also suggested rotating the members of the various committees to
allow the members the opportunity to serve on other committees. Director Cox
agreed with the idea of rotation on a fiscal year basis and when the consolidation
effort is complete this is a real possibility.
Director Sapien asked staff to look at scheduling meetings with other meetrings.
Director Swan noted that in the past there were very few meetings and the only
leadership was through the Executive Committee. The leadership has changed
and accomplishments are still the same. The other result is that the Joint Chair
and Vice Joint Chair are more involved.
Director Hammond indicated that his concern is that the Chair of a District is still
the responsible party when it comes to signing documents, and he would like to
see things discussed in a more intimate setting.
It was decided that all Committee reports will go directly to the Joint Boards. Ad
Hoc Committees will report to the working committee from which they were
formed.
(7) (a) It was moved, seconded and passed to receive and file draft Minutes of the Operations,
Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Meeting held January 3, 1996. There
were no action items to forward.
(8) (a) It was moved, seconded and passed to receive and file draft Minutes of the Ad Hoc
Committee re Space Utilization meeting held January 4, 1996.
(b) It was moved, seconded and passed to consider the recommended actions with the
recommendations of the PDC Committee.
(9) (a) It was moved, seconded and passed to receive and file draft Minutes of the Planning,
Design and Construction Committee Meeting held January 4, 1996.
(b) It was moved, seconded and passed to concur in the recommended actions of the
Planning, Design and Construction Committee Meeting held January 4, 1996, as follows:
PDC96-02: Consideration of Resolution No. 96- , accepting Miscellaneous
Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-42, and Miscellaneous
Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-49, as complete and authorizing
execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout
Agreement. The net amount of change orders previously approved is
$3,313.00, which increased the original contract amount from $235,900.00
to $239,213.00.
Minutes of the Executive Committee
Page 6
January 17, 1996
PDC96-04: Consideration of Resolution No. 96-_, approving plans and specifications
for Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers 3, 4, and 5 at Plant No. 1, Job No.
P1-41; Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Plant No, 1, Job No.
P1-43; Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-44; Rehabilitation of
Primary Clarifiers D through O at Plant No. 2; Seismic Retrofit of Non-
Structural Systems at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-50; Seismic Retrofit at Plant
No. 2, Job No. P2-53-2; Tunnel Cover Replacement at Billings Tunnel at
Plant No. 2, SP19950021; Sludge Piping Modification Primary
Sedimentation Basins 6-15, SP19950059; and authorizing the General
Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids (Tentative bid date is
March 12, 1996). The Engineer's estimate for these projects is
$9,969,800.
Ad Hoc Committee
Agenda Item (8)(b)
and PDC96-05: Consideration of the following actions recommended by the Ad Hoc
Committee re Space Utilization re Restoration of Old Laboratory for
Human Resources Department, Job No. J-11-2:
(1) Consideration of motion concurring with the recommendation
of the Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization providing for the
conversion of the Old Laboratory into administrative space for
the Human Resources Department rather than demolishing
the building as originally intended (Job No. J-11-1), and
providing for funds in the amount of$375,000 for said project.
(2) Consideration of Resolution No. 96- authorizing the
General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids for
Interior Asbestos Removal from Old Laboratory, Job No. J-11-
1 (tentative bid date is February 6, 1996). The authorized
budgeted amount is $150,000.
Director Collins, Chair of the PDC Committee, indicated that the Ad Hoc
Committee considered several alternatives before deciding on the above
actions. Director Sapien questioned the possibility of using state funds for
the asbestos removal; however, state funds may only be used for public
buildings, and this building does not meet those requirements.
Minutes of the Executive Committee
Page 7
January 17, 1996
POC96-06: Consideration of the following motions re Addendum No. 1 to the
Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers regarding
Standby Power Reliability Upgrades, Job No. J-33, and Ocean Outfall
Reliability Upgrades, Job No. J-34, providing for additional design and
construction services:
(1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Planning,
Design and Construction Committee certification of the final
negotiated fee with John Carollo Engineers for said services.
(2) Consideration of Resolution No. 96-_, approving Addendum No. 1
to said agreement with John Carollo Engineers, for said additional
services on an hourly rate basis for labor plus overhead,
subconsultants fees and fixed profit, for an additional amount of
$226,740.00, increasing the authorized contract amount from
$950,252.00 to an amount not to exceed $1.176,992.00.
OMTS95-041: Consideration of the following actions relative to Compressed Natural Gas
(CNG) Refueling Station, Job No. P1-51:
(1) Consideration of Resolution No. 96-_, approving Professional
Services Agreement with Southern California Gas Company
(SoCalGas)for Construction Management Services for Compressed
Natural Gas Refueling Station, Job No. 131-51, in an amount not to
exceed $64,500.
(2) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to solicit
bids and award a purchase order contract to the lowest bidder re
Purchase of Equipment for Compressed Natural Gas Refueling
Station, Job No. PI-51A, for an amount not to exceed $399,300.00,
plus applicable taxes and freight. (This is a request for a waiver of
Section I.A.1 of Resolution 95-62, Exhibit A.)
Director Hammond directed staff to closely oversee the costs of the
professional services.
Director Collins mentioned that the PDC Committee also considered the
establishment of an ecopark at Plant No. 2. Staff will be researching this project in
more detail and report back to the Committee at the next meeting.
Minutes of the Executive Committee e
Page 8
January 17, 1996
(10) It was moved, seconded and passed to approve Items (10)(a), 10(b) and 10(c).
(a) Consideration of motion to receive and file draft Minutes of the Finance,
Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting held November 8, 1995.
(The action items from the November 8, 1995 meeting were submitted to the Joint
Boards at the November 15, 1995 Regular Meeting.)
(b) Consideration of motion to receive and file draft Minutes of the Finance,
Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting held January 10, 1996.
(c) Consideration of motion to concur in the recommended actions of the Finance,
Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting held January 10, 1996, as
follows:
Item (4) Consideration of motion to receive and file Treasurer's Report on
PIMCO's Performance for November 1995.
FAHR96-01 Consideration of the following actions recommended by AIG
Financial Products Corp., for replacement of Letter of Credit,
Refunding Certificates of Participation, Series 1992, as follows:
(a) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to take all necessary
actions to expedite replacement of the Standby Letter of Credit
Agreement with The Industrial Bank of Japan, with a Substitute
Standby Certificate Purchase Agreement with Barclays Bank.
(b) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to retain the services
of a bond counsel firm for the transaction as recommended by
General Counsel, in an amount not to exceed $25,000, to be
entirely reimbursed to the Districts by AIG.
FAHR96-02 Consideration of a motion to purchase four(4) Compaq server-class
computers for use as Districts-wide network servers from AmeriData
(Specification No. E-262R-2)for a total amount not to exceed
$135,875, plus sales tax and 1% CMAS fees.
FAHR96-03 Consideration of Resolution No. 96- , authorizing the establishment
of provisions for Programmers covered by the Professional
Employees MOU for standby and callback pay.
FAHR96-05 Consideration of Resolution No. 96- , amending Resolution No.
95-105 to rescind provisions granting a one-percent salary increase
to all employees re retiree medical health premium offset program.
Results in an annual cost avoidance of$260,000.
FAHR96-08 Consideration of motion authorizing staff to report to Southern
California Association of Governments (SCAG) the Sanitation
Districts' position on the Finance Chapter of SCAG's Regional
Comprehensive Plan and Guide.
4
Minutes of the Executive Committee
Page 9
January 17, 1996
Director Swan indicated that other groups are addressing this issue,
including the CRC, and if SCAG promotes ideas that are not in our
best interests, the Districts could challenge their authority.
An item that appeared on the FAHR agenda, FAHR96.07, but not forwarded to the
Executive Committee was discussed. The FAHR Committee, as requested last
month by the Executive Committee, considered and approved staffs recommendation
to combine the positions of Contract Administrator and Purchasing Manager. Director
Collins went on record that he felt it was a mistake to combine the positions, as it
went against Ernst& Young's recommendation for a contract administrator. In his
opinion these should be two separate positions.
(11) Consideration of motion to receive and file draft Minutes of the Ad Hoc
Committee re Landfill Issues Meetings held November 15, 1995,
December 13, 1995, December 27, 1995 and January 10, 1996.
(12) Report to the Executive Committee on the following items:
(a) Status report on new capacity purchase agreement with SAWPA.
Blake Anderson updated the Executive Committee on the status of the new
agreement currently being considered by SAWPA to replace the existing
agreement executed in 1972. The members of the SAWPA Board received the
agreement and tabled the discussion until February because they did not have
enough time to review it. Staff will be meeting with SAWPA members on the
implications of the agreement, and will report back next month.
(b) EXEC95-01 Status report on consolidation of the nine Sanitation Districts into
one district.
Judy Wilson said that the draft study on the consolidation issues is due from the
consultant on January 23. She will review this carefully, considering various
subjects including underlying debt and the recommended makeup of the new
district, taking into consideration governance and financial information. She
expects the report to be ready to bring to the Executive Committee in February
with staff recommendations. If there is consensus, the application to LAFCO
will then be submitted in March. The LAFCO process is about 90 days, and
completion is expected in June.
(13) CLOSED SESSION
There was no need for a Closed Session.
(14) OTHER BUSINESS
General Counsel discussed the appeal filed by Porter Plating and Jerry D. Porter and
the background of the appeal. If the Executive Committee decides to hear the
appeal, the hearing must be scheduled within 65 days. The District have specific
X.
Minutes of the Executive Committee
Page 10
January 17, 1996 f
rules of procedures for these hearings which were adopted in 1989. No new
evidence will be allowed to be introduced. Outside counsel will be hired to act as
hearing officer. General Counsel will continue due diligence and will provide the
Executive Committee additional information as the facts become more clear. If the
corporation has no assets, there is no reason to hear the appeal.
It was moved, seconded and passed to set a hearing for March 20, 1996 at 5:30 p.m.
re appeal of the Administrative Hearing Determination of Porter Plating, Inc. and
Jerry D. Porter for Industrial Waste Discharge Violations.
(15) MATTERS TO BE REPORTED ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING.
There were none.
(16) MATTERS ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT.
There were none.
(17) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS.
The next Executive Committee meeting is scheduled for February 21, 1996.
(18) ADJOURNMENT.
The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:25 p.m.
bmitted by:
7J Tappan, Secr t
PDJLIGATIXE AW117NMIN
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County,California
P.O.Box 8127.10844 Ellis Avenue
' Fountain Valley,CA.9272"127
Telephone: (714)962-2411
DRAFT
MINUTES OF FINANCE,
ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE
Wednesday, January 10, 1996, 5:30 P.M.
A meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee of the
County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County,
Califomia was held on January 10, 1996 at 5:30 p.m., at the Districts' Administrative
Offices.
(1) ROLL CALL
The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
Committee Directors Present: Staff Present:
George Brown, Chair Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager
Jan Debay Blake P. Anderson, Assistant General Manager
Burnie Dunlap Judith A. Wilson, Assistant General Manager
James Flora Gary Hasenstab, Director of Human Resources
John M. Gullixson Ed Hodges, Director of Maintenance
Wally Lynn Steve Hovey, Director of Information Technology
Thomas Saltarelli Bob Ooten, Director of Operations
Roger R. Stanton, Vice Chair David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
William G. Steiner Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Peer Swan Nancy Wheatley, Director of Technical Services
Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications
Committee Directors Absent: Michael D. White, Controller
Stephen V. Kozak, Financial Manager
John C. Cox, Jr., Joint Chair Mike Peterman, Human Resources
Mike Herrera, Software Systems Manager
Other Directors Present Greg Mathews, Principal Administrative Analyst
Terri Josway, Safety & Emergency Response Mgr.
John Collins Lenora Crane, Committee Secretary
Sal Sapien
Others Present:
Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel
(2) APPOINTMENT OF A CHAIRMAN PRO TEN
No appointment was necessary.
Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee
Page 2
January 10, 1996
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
No comments were made.
(4) REPORTS OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR, GENERAL MANAGER. ASSISTANT
GENERAL MANAGERM. DIRECTOR OF FINANCEfTREASURER. DIRECTOR
OF HUMAN RESOURCES, DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
AND GENERAL COUNSEL
(a) Report of the Committee Chair
Committee Chair George Brown announced the order of the new business
items has been changed to allow items of more importance to be
presented. He indicated a Landfill Committee meeting, scheduled for 7,00
p.m., may result in some items on the FAHR Agenda being deferred to
another meeting.
(b) Report of the General Manager
Don McIntyre advised the Committee a report was placed before them
from the PDC Committee, item PDC96-05. This item was presented to the
PDC Committee on January 4, 1996, and deals with a recommendation
from the Ad Hoc Committee on Space Utilization to rehabilitate the old
laboratory building in order to house Human Resources and Engineering
employees. About 90% of the space will be used by the Human
Resources Department and there will be two to three offices for the
Engineering Department. Mr. McIntyre indicated the PDC Committee
reacted positively to this recommendation, since this will be a better use of
existing assets, though it may be slightly more expensive than the cost of
new trailers. Mr. McIntyre indicated this report was being made for the
Committee's information only.
Mr. McIntyre reminded the Committee that there will be a Workshop held
on January 27, 1996 in the morning and he will be sending a letter out to
solicit interest and participation.
(c) Report of Assistant General Manager- Operations
Blake Anderson stated he would update the Committee on the status of
the bankruptcy later in the meeting. He advised there will be a Landfill
meeting following the FAHR Committee meeting where discussion will
center on Due Diligence. He indicated there was a meeting held earlier in
the day with Orange County City Managers regarding the landfill issues,
and a meeting is scheduled for Thursday evening, January 11 with the
League of Cities, at the Red Lion in Costa Mesa, to discuss the acquisition
issues. Mr. Anderson advised he will continue to refine the numbers and
is reporting to the Landfill Committee tonight about where we are.
Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee
Page 3
January 10, 1996
Report of Assistant General Manager-Administration
Judy Wilson, Assistant General Manager, Administration, had no report.
(d) Report of the Director of Finance/Treasurer
(1) Finance Director/Treasurer Gary Streed updated the Committee on
the status of the Districts' COP program, referring to a graph
contained in the agenda package which shows the CSDOC COP
Rate History. Mr. Streed noted that the rates rise at the end of the
graph. Mr. Streed stated that the average daily rate paid in the first
two quarters of FY 1995-96 has been approximately 3.76%,
however, as of today, the rates have dropped to 2.9% and 3.0%
which is right where we were in July and is very good news.
(2) Districts' Treasurer Gary Streed reviewed the Monthly Report from
PIMCO. Mr. Streed advised that next month PIMCO will have
representatives at the FAHR Committee meeting to go over the 1 st
Quarter Report and to answer any questions the Committee may
have. The 1st Quarter Report will focus on the Liquid Operating
Monies and Long-Term Monies. The report indicates both funds
are performing a little better than the Index and the Districts are in
complete compliance with the Investment Policy.
(a) Report of the Director of Human Resources
The Director of Human Resources had no report.
(f) Report of the Director of Information Technoloqy
The Director of Information Technology had no report.
(g) Report of General Counsel
General Counsel had no report.
(5) APPROVAL OF MINUTES
It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the draft minutes of the
November 6, 1995, meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human
Resources Committee and forward them to the Executive Committee for their
consideration and filed. The minutes were submitted to the Joint Boards at their
November 15, 1995 meeting.
Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee
Page 4
January 10, 1996
(6) OLD BUSINESS
FAHR95-37 Consideration of motion to receive and file Quarterly Status
Matrix from Emst&Youna Administrative Function Review.
Gary Streed briefly reviewed the items enumerated in the Status Matrix pertaining
to the Finance, Human Resources and Information Technology Departments and
informed the Committee this report reflects positive progress for the departments
in meeting their recommended goals. Mr. Streed advised the Committee that
they will be updated of staffs progress on a quarterly basis.
After discussion on this item, it was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve
staffs recommendation to receive and file the Status Matrix.
FAHR9546 Consideration of motion to review and file revised Joint Works
Budget Reviews prepared by staff for the quarter ended
September 30. 1995.
Gary Streed stated the Committee reviewed the preliminary reports at their
November meeting. The revised summary statements of the Joint Works
Operating Costs for the three months of fiscal year 1995-96, some comparative
graphics, and graphs of the Measurement Tracking and Activity Trends from the
1995-96 budgets, which were included in the agenda package, were also
reviewed by Mr. Streed. Mr. Streed advised this report will be brought before the
Committee on a quarterly basis and will be bound in a book for easy reference.
After some discussion on this item, it was moved, seconded and duly carried to
approve staffs recommendation to approve and file these revised reports and
approve the format for future quarterly reports.
(7) NEW BUSINESS
(Please Note: Though the following items were acted on in another sequence,
the minutes will reflect them in numerical order for tracking purposes.)
FAHR96-01 Consideration of the following actions recommended by AIG
Financial Products Corp.. for replacement of Letter of Credit.
Refunding Certificates of Participation. Series 1992 as
follows:
(a) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to take all
necessary actions to expedite replacement of the
Standby Letter of Credit Agreement with The Industrial
Bank of Japan, with a Substitute Standby Certificate
Purchase Agreement with Barclays Bank.
Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee
Page 5
January 10, 1996
(b) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to retain the
services of a bond counsel firm for this transaction as
recommended by General Counsel, in an amount not to
exceed $25,000, to be entirely reimbursed to the Districts
by AIG.
(c) Consideration of motion directing staff to submit all
necessary documents for this transaction to the Joint
Boards of Directors at their January 24, 1996 meeting, for
execution.
Steve Kozak, Financial Manager, advised the AIG Financial Products Corp.
(AIG), is the swap provider for the Series 1992 Series 1992 Refunding COPS.
AIG has served the Districts with a demand letter directing termination of the
existing Standby Letter of Credit Agreement with The Industrial Bank of Japan, in
accordance with the Liquidity Guarantee Agreement. AIG has designated
Barclays Bank to provide the replacement Facility, in the form of a Standby
Certificate Purchase Agreement. The LOC substitution for the 1992 Series
Refunding COPS is in the mutual best interest of the Districts and AIG.
After discussion on this matter, it was moved, seconded and duly carried to
recommend approval of AIG's recommended actions (a), (b) and (c) above to the
Executive Committee.
FAHR96-02 Consideration of a motion to purchase four (4) Compaq
server-class computers for use as Districts-wide network
servers from AmeriData (Specification No. E-262R-2) for a
total cost of $135,875 not including tax and 1% WAS fees.
Information Technology Director Steve Hovey advised the Committee of the need
for an enterprise-wide network operating system and appropriate hardware to
support the system. He reviewed the specifications needed for such a system,
advising the existing Novell servers would not scale up in order to support present
and future computer related services and connectivity requirements.
After discussion on this matter, it was moved, seconded and duly carried to
recommend that the Executive Committee approve staffs recommendation to
award a purchase order to AmeriData (Specification No. E-262R-2) for $135,875
(not including tax and 1% CMSA fees) to purchase four (4) Compaq server-class
computers for use as Districts-wide local area network servers.
FAHR96-03 Consideration of motion to provide standby and callback pay
provisions for Programmers.
Human Resources Director Gary Hasenstab advised that Standby and Callback
pay is provided to the Operations and Maintenance employees that Programmers
work with, and is appropriate compensation for being required to return to work
once the regular workday has ended and the employee has left the plant, and for
Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee
Page 6
January 10, 1996
a
being available for immediate return to work. Programmers who are placed on
standby status or who are called back to work should also be entitled to these
pay bonuses. Mr. Hasenstab indicated the total annual cost of implementing
Callback and Standby pay for Programmers is $11,950.
After discussion on this matter, it was moved, seconded and duly carried to
recommend the Executive Committee approve staffs recommendation to extend
the Standby Pay and Callback pay provisions in other Memoranda of
Understanding to the classification of Programmer in the Professional Group.
FAHR96-04 Consideration of motion to approve benefit coverage for
regular employees working a reduced work week.
Gary Hasenstab reported that the Districts' current Employee Benefit Program is
specifically limited to full-time employees by Resolution 95-105. Mr. Hasenstab
advised that extending employee benefits on a prorated basis to employees who
would like to work a reduced work week would enhance the Districts'
organizational flexibility through job sharing, more accurately match workload
requirements with work schedules, potentially reduce overtime costs and offer a
greater measure of equity to regular employees who do not work a 40-hour week.
After discussion on this item, it was moved, seconded and duly carried to table
this item until the February FAHR Committee meeting. The Committee indicated
an interest in receiving a copy of the Districts' Tuition Reimbursement Policy.
Further information on job sharing and part-time benefits was also requested,
before making a decision on this item.
FAHR96-05 Consideration of motion to approve revision of Resolution
95-105 to reflect agreement with bargaining units to rescind
Provisions granting a one-percent salary increase to all
employees.
Gary Hasenstab reported that the Districts and a majority of represented
employees have agreed to rescind provisions of their respective MOUs granting a
one-percent salary increase to all employees to offset the employees' one-
percent cost to fund the retiree health premium subsidy. A Side Letter of
Agreement has been entered into to document that understanding. The revised
understanding is in the best interest of the employees and the Districts.
It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend the Executive
Committee approve staffs recommendation to amend Resolution 95-105 to
rescind a one-percent salary increase to fund the Retiree Medical Health
Premium since sufficient funds are available from an already existing Additional
Retiree Benefit Account (ARBA).
Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee
Page 7
January 10, 1996
FAHR96-06 Consideration of motion to receive and file staff reports
updating benchmarking and performance measurement
programs.
Judy Wilson, Assistant General Manager, Administration; Greg Mathews,
Principal Administrative Analyst; and Bob Dolan, Director of Operations each
reported on this item. The Districts will use benchmarking practices as a
systemic approach to optimizing operating efficiencies, identifying areas for short
and long-tens cost containment, assuring environmental Compliance, and as a
tool for strategic planning. Recently, the departments have undertaken significant
actions to develop benchmarking and performance measurement strategies.
Activity Trends, as reflected in the FY 1995-96 Budget, are a first step in the
development of our benchmarking and performance measurement programs.
Other projects are underway, including tracking performance externally against
other wastewater agencies, increased utilization of automation, development of
more comprehensive benchmark and performance standards, and an evaluation
of privatization. Bob Ooten's visit to the privatized Indianapolis treatment plant
was also reviewed.
It was moved, seconded and duly carried to receive and file this report.
FAHR96-07 Consideration of status report on Legal Services Committee
Activities.
Judy Wilson reported that on December 13, 1995, the Steering Committee
reviewed a report (included in the agenda package) on the work of the Ad Hoc
Committee on Legal Services comprised of Directors John Gullixson, Tom
Saltarelli and former Joint Chair Bill Mahoney, and recommended this matter be
directed to the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee.
In addition, Ms. Wilson advised that staff has concluded its analysis of the
proposed Contracts Administrator position to ascertain its appropriate role and
function in the organization, and the extent to which outside legal counsel could
be relieved of routine review of contractual issues, were the position to be
established. It was concluded that approximately $68,000 in legal fees can be
saved, and $71,500 in salary savings can be realized, if this position is
consolidated with the Purchasing Manager position.
A "white paper" outlining the various options on the provision of legal services is
expected to be submitted to the Committee in February.
After discussion on this item, it was moved, seconded and duly carried to accept
staff s recommendation to continue with recruitment for a Contracts
Administrator/Purchasing Manager, and Human Resources was directed to
conduct a class survey of that position. The Committee requested that this item
be brought back if a problem should arise which will require further action.
Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee
Page 8
January 10, 1996
FAHR96-08 Consideration of a motion adopting Districts' position on
SCAG's Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide - Finance
Chapter and authorizing staff to report to SCAG.
Judy Wilson, Asst. General Manager Administration, reported that SCAG's
Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide is to raise the economic performance of
the region to a higher level, while ensuring that environmental needs are met and
the quality of life for the region is enhanced. The Regional Comprehensive Plan
frequently provides the basis for new legislative efforts and mandates, therefore,
staff has been following this process and reviewing any recommendations which
could potentially impact the Districts' revenue base. SCAG has established a
February 1, 1996 deadline for comments or concerns.
Ms. Wilson reviewed the Finance Chapter language directed at special district
property taxes, and reported that the County Sanitation Districts currently receive
$31,162,000 a year in property taxes, representing 6.7% of its total funding
sources including reserves. Property taxes have been primarily used for COP
debt service. Debt service on the COPs is approximately $34.6 million. If
property tax were not available for this purpose, user fees would need to be
increased by an average of$34.32 or 48%. Average user fees are currently
$71.31. There would be no change in user fees in Districts 13 and 14 since they
were formed subsequent to the passage of Proposition 13 and do not receive
property taxes.
After discussion on this item, it was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve
staffs recommendation to adopt a Districts' position on SCAG's Regional
Comprehensive Plan and Guide - Finance Chapter; sending formal comments to
SCAG emphasizing the importance of wastewater treatment to the environment
and public health, and that the use of property taxes to retire debt on priority
infrastructure is a reasonable and appropriate use of these funds and contributes
to enhanced property values.
Director Jan Debay requested that staff provide her with a copy of the Districts'
comments when they are formalized.
FAHR96-09 Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Report dated
January 4. 1996 re the Joint Agreement of the County of
Orange. the Official Investment Pool Participants' Committee
and Each Option A Pool Participant: and consideration of
Resolution No. 96- approving said Agreement.
Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager, Operations, reported that on
January 3, 1996, the Orange County Investment Pool (OCIP) Committee reached
final agreement with the County on all of the details of the "Joint Agreement of the
County of Orange, the Official Investment Pool Participants' Committee and Each
Option A Pool Participant" for the resolution of claims against the County of
Orange dated December 18, 1995. The Joint Agreement has been conveyed to
Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee
Page 9
January 10, 1996
P
all Option A participants (the 190 schools, cities, special districts and other public
entities that signed the Option A version of the Comprehensive Settlement
Agreement that was approved in May 1995)for their individual consideration and
approval.
After discussion on this item the Committee moved, seconded and duly carried to
table this item until the February FAHR Committee meeting, since the County has
not yet filed a Financial Disclosure Statement.
(8) CLOSED SESSION
There was no closed session required.
(9) OTHER BUSINESS, IF ANY
None.
(10) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A
SUBSEQUENT MEETING
No reports were requested.
(11) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE
AGENDA FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT
None.
(13) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING DATES AND ITEMS TO BE
DISCUSSED AT THOSE MEETINGS
The next Committee meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, February 14, 1996.
(14) ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at
7:05 p.m.
Q �
Lenora Crane
Finance, Administration and Human
Resources Committee Secretary
J NWPDOCTINICRANEIFPC.MTGTAHR.WI996.MINWFAHR1.99
c County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County,California
P.O. Box 8127•10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127
Telephone: (714)962-2411
DRAFT
MINUTES OF PLANNING, DESIGN AND
CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE
THURSDAY, JANUARY 4. 1996, at 5:30 P.m.
A regular meeting of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee of the County Sanitation
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13, and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Thursday,
January 4, 1996, at the Districts' Administrative Office.
(1) ROLL CALL
The roll was taken and a quorum declared present, as follows:
Planning, Design and
Construction Committee: Staff Present:
Present: Don McIntyre, General Manager
Blake Anderson, Assistant General
John Collins, Chair Manager
John Cox Judith Wilson, Assistant General Manager
Shirley Dettloff David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Don Griffin Steve Hovey, Director of Info. Technology
Barry Hammond Bob Doter, Director of Operations
Margie Rice John Linder, Construction Manager
Sheldon Singer, Vice Chair Corinne Berenson, Public Information Officer
Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair Mike Peterman, Human Resources Supervisor
Charles Sylvia Michelle Tuchman, Communications Manager
Bob Zemel Greg Mathews, Principal Administrative
Analyst
John Dettle, Project Manager
Others Present:
Absent:
Mary Lee, John Carollo Engineers
Walter K. Bowman
-a
Minutes of Planning, Design and ,
Construction Committee Meeting
Page 2
January 4, 1996
(2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments received.
(4) APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 4, 1996 MEETING
The minutes of the November 2, 1995 Planning, Design and Construction Committee
Meeting were approved as written.
(5) REPORTS OF COMMITTEE CHAIR, GENERAL MANAGER, ASSISTANT GENERAL
MANAGER, DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING, AND GENERAL COUNSEL
(a) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
The Committee Chair commented on the importance of attending the Integrated
Waste Management Meetings. The next meeting will be at Fountain Valley City
Hall, Conference Room 1, on Thursday, January 25, 1996.
(b) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
The General Manager reminded everyone of the Board of Directors' Workshop for
the Strategic Plan. This will be held on Saturday, January 27, 1996.
(c) REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER
Judy Wilson introduced new employees Greg Mathews, Principal Administrative
Analyst; Michelle Tuchman, Communications Manager, and Mike Peterman,
Human Resources Supervisor.
Blake Anderson gave an update on the Landfill Committee's pending actions. He
spoke about flow control issues. He also gave an update on the bankruptcy and
the status of the joint agreement.
(d) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING
No report was given.
(e) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
No report was given.
Minutes of Planning, Design and
Construction Committee Meeting
Page 3
January 4, 1996
(6) STAFF OVERVIEW OF DISTRICTS' PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION
ACTIVITIES
(a) Status Report on Jobs within the Plants and the Districts by the Director of
Engineering
No report was given.
(7) OLD BUSINESS
None to report.
(8) ACTIONS RE PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTS
(a) Monthly Change Order Report by Director of Engineering on Change Orders
approved by the General Manager, Planning, Design and Construction
Committee, and Joint Boards.
A revised packet was distributed which contained the revised spreadsheet of the
Monthly Change Order Report. The Construction Manager reported on the Monthly
Change Order Report. He discussed the three new Change Orders listed on the
report.
(b) Quarterly Change Order Report by Director of Engineering on Change Orders
approved by the General Manager, Planning, Design and Construction
Committee, and Joint Boards.
A revised packet was distributed which contained the revised spreadsheet of the
Quarterly Change Order Report for the 2nd Quarter of FY95-96. The Construction
Manager reported on the Quarterly Change Order Report. He discussed the six
Change Orders that were approved during the last quarter.
(c) Action Items:
PDC9"1: Consideration of the following actions relative to the Plans and
Specifications for Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer,
Phase 2, Contract No. 3-38-2: Approval of Change Order No. 1
in the amount of $45,255.69, approval of Change Order No. 2 for
a credit of$32,126.00, and approval of Closeout Agreement.
The net amount of change orders on this contract is $13,129.68,
which increases the original contract amount from
$1,091,753.00 to $1,104,882.68.
(1) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. i
to the Plans and Specifications for said project
authorizing an addition of$45,255.69 to the contract with
Calfon Construction, Inc. for seven items of added work
and no extension of time.
Minutes of Planning, Design and '
Construction Committee Meeting
Page 4
January 4, 1996
(2) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2
to the Plans and Specifications for said project
authorizing a net deduction of$32,126.00 to the contract
with Calfon Construction, Inc.for an Adjustment of
Engineer's Quantities.
(3) Consideration of Resolution No. 96-J accepting the
said contract as complete, authorizing execution of the
Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout
Agreement.
The Director of Engineering discussed the two Change
Orders and the Closeout Agreement. It was moved,
seconded, and carried to recommend approval of this item
by the Board of Directors.
PDC96-02: Consideration of motion accepting Miscellaneous
Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-42, and Miscellaneous
Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-49, as complete,
authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion, and
approving the Final Closeout Agreement. The net amount of
change order previously approved is $3,313.00, which
increased the original contract amount from $235,000.00 to
$239,213.00.
The Director of Engineering provided information concerning the
closeout of this job. It was moved, seconded, and carried to
recommend approval of this item.
PDC96-03: Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 9 to the
Plans and Specifications for Secondary Treatment Expansion at
Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-02-2, authorizing an addition of
$35,639.00 to the contract with Margate Construction for six
items of additional work, and 14 calendar days time extension,
increasing the total authorized compensation to an amount not
to exceed $14,464,346.00.
The Director of Engineering explained Change Order No. 9 for Job
No. P2-42-2. It was moved, seconded, and carried to approve this
item per authority vested in the Committee by Resolution 95-9.
PDC96-04: Consideration of Resolution No. 96-_, approving plans and
specifications for Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers 3, 4, and 5
at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-41; Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural
Systems at Plant No. 1, Job No. 1311-03; Seismic Retrofit at Plant
No. 1, Job No. P11-44; Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers D
through Q at Plant No. 2; Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural
Systems at Plant No. 2, Job No. 13250; Seismic Retrofit at Plant
No. 2, Job No. P253-2; Demolition of Old Laboratory,
Minutes of Planning, Design and
Construction Committee Meeting
Page 5
January 4, 1996
Job No. J-11.1; Tunnel Cover Replacement at Billings Tunnel at
Plant No. 2, SP19950021; Sludge Piping Modification Primary
Sedimentation Basins 6-15, SP19950059, and authorizing the
General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids
(Tentative bid date is March 12. 1996).
The Director of Engineering explained this project which originally
consisted of nine individual jobs. The Chair recommended removal
of Job No. J-11-1 based on Ad Hoe Committee's recommendation,
which is discussed in PDC96-05. Therefore, the staff
recommendation was modified to authorize the General Manager to
advertise and receive bids on the eight remaining items for a total
amount of$9,969,800. It was moved, seconded, and carried to
recommend approval of this item.
PDC96-05: Consideration of Resolution No. 96- for an action from the Ad Hoc
Committee regarding office space for the Human Resources
Department.
John Dettle did a brief presentation on the recommendation of staff to
restore the old laboratory building for use by the Human Resources
Department. After much discussion, the PDC Committee concurred with
the recommendation of the Ad Hoc Committee to establish a fund of
$375,000.00, authorize the General Manager to award a Professional
Services Agreement for design of Restoration of Old Laboratory for Human
Resources Department in an amount not to exceed $30,000.00, and
authorize the General Manager to award a construction contract for interior
asbestos removal in the old laboratory to the lowest qualified bidder for an
amount not to exceed $150,000.00. It was moved, seconded, and carried
to recommend approval of this item.
(9) ADDENDA TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS
PDC96-06: Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the
Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers
regarding Standby Power Reliability Upgrades, Job No. J-33, and
Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades, Job No. J-34, adding $236,890.00,
increasing the authorized amount from $950,252.00 to $1,187,140.00
for added design and construction services.
The Director of Engineering presented information regarding the proposed
addendum for Professional Services. There was discussion from the floor
regarding the addendum for design services to lower the surge tower. It
was decided by the Committee to delete that portion of the addendum to
redesign the surge tower. It was moved, seconded and carried to
recommend approval of Addendum No. 1 authorizing an addition to the
Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for Standby
Power Reliability Modifications, Job No. J-33; and Ocean Outfall Reliability
Upgrades, Job No. J-34-1, for added construction services, increasing the
maximum authorized amount from $950,252.00 to$1,176,992.00, an
increase of$226,740.00.
Minutes of Planning, Design and
Construction Committee Meeting
Page 6
January 4, 1996
(10) NEW PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS
OMTS95-041: Consideration of the following actions relative to Compressed Natural
Gas(CNG)Refueling Station, Job No. P151:
(1) Approve Professional Services Agreement with Southern
California Gas Company(SoCalGas) for Design and
Construction Management Services for Job No. P1S1.
(2) Staff recommends authorization for the General Manager to
solicit bids for long lead items and proceed with purchasing
them, as long as their cost does not exceed the budgeted
amount of$399,300.00, plus applicable taxes and freight.
The Director of Engineering reported on this item. Staff was
directed to negotiate the proposed fees for Construction
Management Services further with SoCalGas. After much
discussion it was moved, seconded, and carried to recommend
approval of this item.
(11) CONSIDERATION OF NEW AND MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS
PDC96-07: Staff report outlining asset management options for 30 acres of
undeveloped land at the north end of Plant No. 2.
Corinne Berenson conducted a slide presentation for the development of a
portion of the acreage into an educational and research center. The
Committee rejected the recommended action and instructed staff to pursue
options that would optimize the revenue for leasing the property.
(12) CLOSED SESSION
The Chair determined that there was no need for a closed session.
(13) OTHER BUSINESS, IF ANY
None.
(14) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A
SUBSEQUENT MEETING
There were no matters discussed.
(15) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR
ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT
There were no matters discussed.
Minutes of Planning, Design and
Construction Committee Meeting
Page 7
January 4, 1996
(16) NEXT MEETING
(a) Executive Committee Meeting —Wednesday, January 17, 1996, at 5:30 p.m.
(b) Joint Boards of Directors Meeting -- Wednesday, January 24, 1996, at 7:30 p.m.
(a) Planning, Design and Construction Committee Meeting—Thursday,
February 1, 1996.
(17) OTHER ANNOUNCEMENTS, IF ANY
None.
(18) ADJOURNMENT
The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:15 p.m.
/z a"-"
ail A. Cain
Planning, Design and Construction
Committee Secretary
1..PDxTODC84JAM01pC.WN
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
- P.O.Box 8127• 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127
Telephone: (714)962-2411
DRAFT
MINUTES OF AD HOC COMMITTEE
MEETING
Thursday, January 4. 1996, at 5:00 p.m.
A meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee of
the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13, and 14 of Orange County,
California was held on Thursday, January 4, 1996, at 5:00 p.m. at the Districts'
Administrative Office.
(1) ROLL CALL
Those present were as follows:
AD HOC COMMITTEE: STAFF PRESENT:
John Collins, PDC Comm. Chair Don McIntyre, General Manager
John Cox Blake Anderson, Assistant General
Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair Manager
Don Griffin Judith Wilson, Assistant General
Manager
DIRECTORS PRESENT: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Mike Peterman, Human Resources
Sheldon Singer Supervisor
John Dettle, Project Manager
(2) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments received.
(3) APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of the November 2, 1995 Ad Hoc Committee were approved as written.
(4) REPORTS OF COMMITTEE CHAIR GENERAL MANAGER, AND DIRECTOR OF
ENGINEERING
There were no reports.
Minutes of Ad Hoc Committee Meeting
Page 2
January 4, 1996
(6) STATUS OF REPORT ON DISTRICTS' OFFICE SPACE UTILIZATION STUDY, JOB
NO. J-38-1
No report was given.
(6) NEW AND MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS
Consideration of actions regarding office facilities for the Human
Resources Department. Actions to be considered are two alternatives
grouped together and taken as either (a) (1) and (2); or (b) (1) and (2).
(a) (1) Authorize the General Manager to award of Professional Services
Agreement for design of Restoration of Old Laboratory for Human
Resources Offices in an amount not to exceed $30,000.00 (the
authority vested to the PDC Committee), and
(2) Authorize the General Manager to award of construction
contract for interior asbestos removal in the old laboratory
building to the lowest qualified bidder for an amount not to
exceed $150,000.00; or,
(b) (1) Authorize the General Manager to award of Professional
Services Agreement for design of a Human Resources Trailer
Complex in an amount not to exceed the authority vested to
the PDC Committee, and
(2) Authorize solicitation of proposals to furnish and install a
Human Resources Trailer Complex.
At the request of the Ad Hoc Committee Re Space Utilization, John Dettle did a brief
presentation on the recommendation of staff to restore the old laboratory building for
use by the Human Resources Department. He presented a floor plan layout of the
restored building and discussed the scope of the work involved, including roof repair,
HVAC replacement, ADA upgrades, interior finishes, and seismic upgrades. He then
presented an exhibit outlining cost estimates for the restoration versus the purchase
cost of a new trailer complex, including the costs to be saved by not demolishing the
old laboratory.
Minutes of Ad Hoc Committee Meeting
Page 3
January 4, 1996
The Ad Hoc Committee concurred with the recommendation of staff to establish a
fund of$375,00.00, authorize the General Manager to award a Professional Services
Agreement for design of Restoration of Old Laboratory for Human Resources in an
amount not to exceed $30,000.00, and authorize the General Manager to award a
construction contract for interior asbestos removal in the old laboratory to the lowest
qualified bidder for an amount not to exceed $150,000.00. These recommendations
will be presented to the PDC Committee for action.
(7) OLD BUSINESS
No old business was discussed.
(8) OTHER BUSINESS, IF ANY
No other business was discussed.
(9) NEXT MEETING
The next Ad Hoc Meeting has not yet been scheduled.
(10) ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 5:30 p.m.
Gail Cain
Committee Secretary
DAL:gc
J:\W PDOC W OH0C%UANV049G.MIN
+� County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County,California
P.O. Box 8127• 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127
Telephone: (714)962-2411
DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND
TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE
WEDNESDAY. JANUARY 3, 1996 -5,30 P.M.
A meeting of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee of the County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on
January 3, 1996, at 5:30 P.M. at the Districts'Administrative offices.
(1) ROLL CALL
The roll was called and a quorum declared present as follows:
Committee Directors Present: Staff Present:
Pat McGuigan, Chair Don McIntyre, General Manager
John C. Cox, Jr., Joint Chair Blake Anderson, Chief Operations Officer
Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair Ed Hodges, Director of Maintenance
Barry Denes Steve Hovey, Director of Information Technology
Norman Z. Eckenrode Bob Doter, Director of Operations
James M. Ferryman Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Mark Murphy Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications
Chris Norby Nancy Wheatley, Director of Technical Services
Sal Sapien Mark Esquer, Engineering Supervisor, Operations
George Robertson, Environmental Management Supervisor
Jim Wybenga, Principal Environmental Specialist
Committee Directors Absent:
Victor Leipzig, Vice Chair
(2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIRMAN PRO TEM. IF NECESSARY
No appointment was necessary.
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no comments from the public.
0
Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance �A
and Technical Services Committee Meeting
Page 2 of 5
January 10, 1995
(4) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR GENERAL MANAGER. ASSISTANT
GENERAL MANAGER OF OPERATIONS. DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS, DIRECTOR
OF MAINTENANCE AND DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES
(a) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
The Committee Chair reminded everyone of the Strategic Plan Workshop on
January 27, 1996.
(b) REPORT OF GENERAL MANAGER
Don McIntyre reiterated the importance of the Strategic Plan Workshop.
Don also reported that item number OMTS96-005 is being postponed until the
next fiscal year's budget.
(c) REPORT OF ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER OF OPERATIONS
Blake Anderson gave an update on the Bankruptcy situation. A joint agreement
was approved today. The agreement improves the Districts' position to receive
proceeds from Merrill Lynch; however, it takes away the possibility of receiving
further proceeds from the County.
Blake also reported on the Landfill purchase proceedings which are on track.
The Ad Hoc Committee on the Landfill purchase will be meeting January 10,
1996.
(d) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS
Bob Ooten reported that it has been a year since the heavy rains of January
1995. The outfall system is designed for 480mgd capacity. The outfall system
pumped 550mgd on January 4, 1995. At 550mgd, the system was pumping at its
capacity limit. John Carollo Engineers was hired to study how to increase the
system's capacity beyond 550mgd. The project is complete. The consultant
wrote an Operations manual and provided training for the operators on what to
do in the situation of high peak flows.
(e) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF MAINTENANCE
Ed Hodges introduced Michelle Tuchman, the new Director of Communications,
after which she gave a brief background on herself.
Ed also updated the Committee on the status of the compressed natural gas
(CNG) station:
1. It is going before the PDC Committee on January 4, 1996. Staff is
requesting authorization to go to bid on a professional services
agreement and to purchase the long lead time dems.
,.... Minutes of the Operations. Maintenance
and Technical Services Committee Meeting
Page 3 of 5
January 10, 1996
2. There will be a meeting of the partners of the project this month
which will include the AOMD.
3. The Gas Company will be able to do the billing for the Districts for
$.20 per transaction (postage would cost the Districts more) so
there is a third-party billing agreement currently being drafted by
Counsel.
4. Pima Gro was asked to consider lowering their price per ton. We
now pay anywhere from $26 to $28; they have proposed lowering
the price to less than $25 per ton.
5. We will be receiving federal funding for three more engines (must
be commercially available) to be converted.
(f) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES
Nancy Wheatley reported on the status of the discharge monitoring permit. The
EPA is closed down with the other federal offices and the pennit is forthcoming.
Nancy also reported that the die testing in the Bolsa Chica area has come up
negative, to date. Staff is refining the technique and will try again.
(5) APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 1. 1995
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held
on November 1, 1995. it was moved, seconded and carried that said minutes be
deemed approved as mailed.
(6) NEW BUSINESS
OMTS96-001: Staff report regarding the current status of the Grit and
Screenings Removal Services Request for Proposal process,
Specification No. P-168. (No action required.)
Mark Esquer gave a brief report on this item after which he said that staff will be
returning to the Committee in March for approval.
OMTS96-002: Staff report regarding current status of electric power utility
deregulation in California and the anticipated impacts on the
Districts.
Bob Dolan gave a presentation during which a discussion ensued.
OMTS96-003: Consideration of motion to extend SAIC Year 10 contract 123
days to June 30, 1996 (Specification No. S-032, Amendment 11,
Resolution 94-60), at no additional cost.
Nancy Wheatley gave a short presentation after which it was moved, seconded and
carried to approve staffs recommendation without discussion.
Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance .q
and Technical Services Committee Meeting
Page 4 of 5
January 10, 1996
OMTS96-004: Consideration of motion to approve new discharge agreement
between Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) and
the Districts entitled Wastewater Treatment and Disposal
Agreement,to rescind existing agreement with SAWPA entitled
Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Agreement dated 1972, to
authorize staff to cancel outstanding capacity purchase invoices
to SAWPA issued under the terms of the 1972 agreement totaling
$18,688,133.00, and authorize staff to invoice SAWPA in the
approximate amount of$4.6 million for the purchase of 1MGD
under the terms of the new agreement.
Nancy Wheatley and Jim Wybenga gave a presentation after which a lengthy discussion
ensued and staff fielded the questions of the Committee.
It was moved, seconded and carried to approve staffs recommendation.
OMTS96-005: Consideration of the following actions relative to the
Professional Services Agreement with Clayton Environmental
Services, Inc. for industrial hygiene related services.
1. Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the
Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee
certification of the final negotiated fee with Clayton
Environmental Services, Inc. for said services.
2. Consideration of Resolution No. 96-_, approving said
agreement with Clayton Environmental Services, Inc.for said
services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor, including
overhead, on an as-needed basis, for the period of
January 24, 1996 through June 30, 1997, for a total amount
not to exceed $350,000.00.
This item was removed from the agenda and will reappear with the budget for the next
fiscal year.
(7) CLOSED SESSION
The Chair declared there were no items for closed session.
(8) OTHER BUSINESS, IF ANY
None.
(9) MATTERS ON WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT AT A
SUBSEQUENT MEETING
The Committee asked staff to look into a possible energy or reclamation site on
Boatman Avenue in Stanton to determine its business capacity and possible effects on
our system.
The Directors thanked Ed Hodges for cleaning up Plant No. 2 and getting rid of the
"bone yard."
Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance
and Technical Services Committee Meeting
Page 5 of 5
January 10, 1996
(10) MATTERS A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR
ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT
None.
(11) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING DATES AND ITEMS TO BE
DISCUSSED AT THOSE MEETINGS
None.
(12) ADJOURNMENT
The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:10 P.M.
Clarice M. Marcin
Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services
Committee Secretary
J:\WPDOCkGM\EXEC96WAN\OMTS.MIN
n
County Sanitation Districts
v of Orange County,California
P.O. Box 8127 • 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127
Telephone: (714)962-2411
DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE
December 13, 1995 - 5:30 p.m.
A meeting of the Steering Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held Wednesday, December 13, 1995,
at 5:30 p.m., at the Districts' Administrative office.
(1) ROLL CALL
The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
STEERING COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT:
Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel
Present: Director Don R. Griffin
John C. Cox, Jr., Joint Chair Director Sheldon Singer
Peer A. Swan, Vice Joint Chair
George Brown, Chair, FAHR STAFF PRESENT:
John J. Collins, Chair, PDC Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager
Pat McGuigan, Chair, OMTS Blake P. Anderson, Assistant General Manager
Judith A. Wilson, Assistant General Manager
Absent: Nancy Wheatley, Director of Technical Services
Roger Stanton, Vice Chair, FAHR Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary
(2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no comments by any member of the public.
(4) APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of the November 15, 1995 Steering Committee meeting were
approved as drafted.
Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting
Page 2
December 13, 1995
(5) REPORTS OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR. GENERAL MANAGER AND
GENERAL COUNSEL
(a) There was no report by the Committee Chairman.
(b) There was no report by the General Manager.
(c) There was no report by Counsel.
(6) DISCUSSION ITEMS
f as Report on the Governance and Committee System
The General Manager briefed the Committee on staffs proposal presented
last month to the Steering Committee to consider combining the OMTS and
PDC Committees; or consider having those two meetings scheduled on the
same day; or reassigning the responsibility of the Executive Committee to
serve as an "ad hoc" type committee, charged with oversight on special
assigned issues such as consolidation. One of the main reasons for these
proposed changes is to reduce the amount of staff time required to prepare
for the meetings.
Chair Cox indicated that the committees have not been effective as he had
envisioned and that some change should be made. The Steering
Committee has not been involved in the "steering" process, but rather
functioning more like an oversight committee.
Director Swan suggested that the Executive Committee be held only on an
as-needed basis and for items that require a District-by-District vote. The
OMTS Committee should only address how the plant works, costs of
treatment, benchmarking to reduce those costs, and how to utilize assets
better. The PDC Committee should act only on planning, design and
construction issues. Benchmarking for those functions needs to be
developed in order to organize the work better.
By not going through the Executive Committee, the Committee chairs will
be responsible for reporting on activities directly to the Boards. Staff will
prepare synopsis of actions for the chair's presentation.
Director Griffin suggested that the Executive Committee meet quarterly for
a briefing on overall issues.
Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting
Page 3
December 13, 1995
It was moved, seconded and passed that the three working committees
continue to meet and recommend that the Executive Committee be held on
an as-needed basis including responsibility for consolidation.
The Steering Committee members indicated that they would like to see
pre-agendas for the next monthly committee meetings.
(b) Report on Legal Services Review Group
A self-appointed "committee", comprised of Directors Gullixson and
Saltarelli and former Director and Joint Chair Bill Mahoney, has been
meeting with staff and General Counsel to discuss the issue of legal
services. A couple of meetings have been held and they are talking about
more meetings. The Steering Committee decided that this issue should be
placed on the FAHR Committee agenda for January, and a letter is to be
sent to Director Gullixson asking him to discuss this issue with that
Committee.
(c) Benchmarking of Salaries for Executive Management
Judy Wilson reported that at the October Steering Committee meeting the
Directors asked for a comparison of Districts' executive management
salaries with other public and private entities. In all instances, Districts
salaries are below similar positions in public sector.
The theory of broad banding was discussed. With 132 job classifications
for 600+ employees, there is room for consolidation. A "white paper" on
broad banding will be prepared for presentation at the April Steering
Committee meeting. The issues of the effects on the labor agreements
and what the net dollar change would be will be addressed. At first it is
anticipated that only management positions would be included in broad
banding.
(d) Human Resources Space Needs
Judy Wilson reported on temporary space needs for Human Resources
until a permanent solution is determined. Right now they are housed in 25-
year old trailers that are dilapidated and termite-ridden. The Space Study
is due to be completed in April and any permanent facility won't be ready
for at least 18 months. In the interim staff is evaluating the feasibility of
rehabbing the old lab for HR's use, and when a permanent facility is
completed, turning it into a training center.
Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting
Page 4
December 13, 1995
Chair Cox directed staff to present this to the Ad Hoc Committee.
(a) Update on Sangermano Case
This rase is moving towards trial in a couple of months. An attorney
substitution has been made by Lou Sangermano.
(f) Report on Patterson vs CSDOC Case
Special Counsel Howard Slavin has indicated that trial is scheduled for
June.
(g) Update Report on Willful Destruction of Property at Plant No. 2
Blake Anderson reported on the two cases. Both appear to be intentional
acts, though there is no proof. The investigation was done by the Chief
Operator and others. Everyone who was on the shift when the destruction
occurred has been interviewed.
(h) Update on Due Diligence re Landfill Issues
General Counsel reported that the formation of a new sanitation district
covering the entire county would take several months to complete. LAFCO
will be pressed to try to move this along. The other alternative is for a
special act by the state legislature, and the Board of Supervisors. The
Committee members did not support the special act option.
(7) CLOSED SESSION
There was no closed session.
(8) OTHER BUSINESS
A discussion of"perceived instances of conflicts of interest" resulted in Director
Swan suggesting that any and all resolutions that affect the conduct of Directors
be codified for all directors and included in the Directors' Handbooks. Staff will
make this available as soon as possible for inclusion in the handbooks.
Nancy Wheatley reported on the proposed settlement and the agreement with
SAWPA. Their board will be acting on this agreement in January and it will be
presented to our committees in January also.
Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting
Page 5
December 13, 1995
Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting
Page 6
December 13, 1995
(9) MATTERS TO BE REPORTED AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING
There were no matters to be reported on at a subsequent meeting.
(10) MATTERS ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT
There were no matters for a future agenda.
(11) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS
The next Steering Committee meeting has been scheduled for January 24, 1996
at 5:30 p.m.
(12) ADJOURNMENT
The Steering Committee adjourned at approximately 7:25 p.m.
ubmitted by:
JdAn Tappan, Steefinfi Committee Secretary
J1 WL`.GMST MM 121385.MIN
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
JANUARY 24, 1996
AGENDA ITEM (11)(b)(1): Exec. Item (6)(b)(1): Consideration of motion to
retain current Committee system of three policy
committees, and convene the Executive Committee on an as-needed basis after June 30,
1996.
umma
At its November and December 1995 meetings, the Steering Committee reviewed the current
governance system for the Districts to determine 'd it was working as envisioned, and if there
were opportunities for streamlining and improvement.
Background
In April 1995, there was a discussion by the Boards about the current committee system. Some
staff concerns were expressed about the amount of staff costs and time associated with
supporting this system. It was agreed that this issue would be revisited again in December after
the Districts had gained at least a year's worth of operating experience with the current
committee system.
At its November 1995 meeting, the Steering Committee had a preliminary discussion and
considered the following options:
Consolidating the Planning, Design and Construction Committee and the Operations,
Maintenance and Technical Services Committee into an Operating Committee;
Eliminating the Executive Committee since it has been primarily a"pass-through' committee
acting on the work of other committees;
Creating a permanent Landfill Committee if the Boards vote to purchase;
Re-evaluating the monthly Joint Boards meeting. Rather than using the Executive Committee to
hear reports of the Committee chairs, these reports would be made at the monthly meeting of the
Joint Boards. Assuming that Consolidation is successful, individual District's business would no
longer be separately agendized, thus allowing more time for conducting business.
It was agreed at the November Steering Committee meeting that these issues would be
discussed at the December Steering Committee meeting and that a recommendation would be
prepared for the Boards' consideration at the January 24, 1996 meeting. It was the general
consensus of the Steering Committee that the three-committee system is working well. Service
on the committees is allowing Board members to become more knowledgeable and provide
better policy guidance.
Although there has been some redundancy on the OMTS and PDC agendas, there may be times
when both committees need briefings on certain items. It was noted that there may be
opportunities to hold joint meetings when appropriate, and that the Steering Committee should
take a stronger role in directing policy items to the appropriate committees to avoid unnecessary
redundancy.
,�us+vmo
With the expectation that the Consolidation effort will be through the lAFCO process by June
1996, the role of the Executive Committee, as originally envisioned, is no longer required. In the
interim, while the Consolidation process is underway, the Executive Committee would be
convened on an as-needed basis at the call of the Joint Chair. The Steering Committee further
agreed that the Consolidation process should be referred to the Executive Committee as the
appropriate policy committee to prepare final recommendation for the Joint Boards.
Regarding a policy committee for the landfill issues, the Districts will continue to use the Ad Hoc
Committee on Landfill Acquisition until a final decision is made on whether a sale is agreed upon
by the County and the Districts. Governance issues will be evaluated at that time, in concert with
the formation of a new county-wide Sanitation District for landfill activities.
umma
In summation, the Steering Committee made the following observations and conclusions:
The current system is working well;
Board members should not be under stringent time constraints in considering important policy
decisions; hence, the recommendation to continue the current schedule of separate meeting
dates for each committee;
The Committees should continue to focus their work and define their missions to ensure that
careful attention is being give to Districts' business;
Use the Executive Committee on an as-needed basis at the discretion of the Joint Chair, with the
understanding that the Executive Committee will have the policy oversight for the Districts'
consolidation;
Provide the Committee chairs with written "bullet report" summaries to facilitate their
presentations to the monthly Boards meetings.
Staff Recommendation
That the Executive Committee consider a motion to retain the current Committee system of three
policy committees and convene the Executive Committee on an as-needed basis.
Executive Committee Recommendation
That the Joint Boards of Directors consider a motion to retain the existing Committee system of
three policy committees, and convene the Executive Committee monthly through June and then
on an as-needed basis to handle issues with Districts-wide impacts. Staff is to continue to
investigate ways to streamline the approval process.
sy�camawwnsnnsvwro
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
JANUARY 24, 1996
Agenda Item (11 )(b)(2): PDC96-02: Consideration of Resolution
No. 96-2, accepting Miscellaneous
Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1.42,
and Miscellaneous Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-49, as complete,
authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout
Agreement for a final total contract amount of$239,213.00 (original awarded
contract amount of$235,900.00).
Summary
Job No.P1 42 provides forthe installation of a Headwork No.2 influent pump drive shaft;placement of
sidewalks,stair tread replacement and stair stiffening at the north end of Primary Sedimentation Basins 6-
15;installation of pipe bracing in the Primary Sedimentation Basins 6-15 Piping Galleries; relocation of
stairs In the Waste Sidestream Pump Station;stair stiffening at Primary Effluent Diversion Box;installation
of an access platform at the Headworks Scrubbers; and asphalt pavement overlays adjacent to the Gas
Compressor Building. Job No.P249 provides for the installation of a rectangular butterfly valve in the
aerated secondary clarifier influent channel;modifications to gas compressor condensation drain piping;
replacement of five engine panel power supplies and installation of four battery disconnects in the Central
Generation Building;replacement of ten 12kv fuses located in Distribution Center"A',Power Building'A'
and Power Building"B". The construction contract was awarded in June 1993 to Pascal&Ludwig
Engineers in the amount of$235,900.00. The majority of the design was completed by the District's staff
and the remaining balance designed by Lee&Ro Consulting Engineers. This project is now complete.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends consideration of the resolution authorizing acceptance of the work as complete,
execution of the final Closeout Agreement, and file the Notice of Completion as required.
PDC Committee Recommendation
The PDC Committee recommends consideration of the resolution authorizing acceptance of the work as
complete,execution of the final Closeout Agreement, and file the Notice of Completion as required.
Executive Committee Recommendation
The Executive Committee concurs in the recommendation of the PDC Committee.
nwa000asuwe��n5a�r aiwvo
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
d ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
103n ELU6 AVENUE
RO.BOX 8127
f NTAIN VALLEY CORORNIA 9272"127
91.19624411
January 4, 1996
STAFF REPORT
PDC96-02: Proposed consideration of motion accepting Miscellaneous Improvements
at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-42 and Miscellaneous Improvements at Plant
No. 2, Job No. P2-49, as complete and authorizing execution of the Notice
of Completion and Approving the Final Closeout Agreement.
Summary
Job No. Pl-42 provides for the installation of a Headworks No. 2 influent pump drive shaft;
placement of sidewalks, stair tread replacement and stair stiffening at the north end of Primary
Sedimentation Basins 6-15; installation of pipe bracing in the Primary Sedimentation Basins
6-15 Piping Galleries; relocation of stairs in the Waste Sidestream Pump Station; stair stiffening
at Primary Effluent Diversion Box; installation of an access platform at the Headworks
Scrubbers; and asphalt pavement overlays adjacent to the Gas Compressor Building. Job
No. P249 provides for the installation of a rectangular butterfly valve in the aerated secondary
clarifier influent channel; modifications to gas compressor condensate drain piping; replacement
of five engine panel power supplies and installation of four battery disconnects in the Central
Generation Building; replacement of ten 12kv fuses located in Distribution Center"A", Power
Building "A", and Power Building"B". The construction contract was awarded in June 1993 to
Pascal & Ludwig Engineers in the amount of$235,900.00. The majority of the design was
completed by Districts' staff and the remaining balance designed by Lee & Ro Consulting
Engineers.
The original contract amount for these projects is $235,900.00. The net amount of change
orders to date is $3,313.00 representing an net increase of 1.4% over the original contract
amount. The final adjusted contract amount is $239,213.00.
Staff Recommendations
Staff recommends consideration of the resolution authorizing acceptance of the work as
complete, execution of the final Closeout Agreement, and file the Notice of Completion as
required.
ENGNYIGRRPTSISROI-02.96
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
AGENDA FOR
JANUARY 24, 1996
Agenda Item (11 )(b)(3): PDC96-04: Consideration of Resolution No. 96-3,
approving plans and specifications for Rehabilitation
of Primary Clarifiers 3,4,and 5 at Plant No.1,Job
No. P141; Seismic Retrofit of NonStructural Systems at Plant No. 1,Job No. P143; Seismic
Retrofit at Plant No. 1,Job No. P144; Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers D through Q at Plant
No.2,Job No.132-48;Seismic Retrofit of Nonstructural Systems at Plant No. 2,Job No.P2-50;
Seismic Retrofit at Plant No.2,Job No.P2-53.2;Tunnel Cover Replacement at Billings Tunnel at
Plant No.2,SP19950021;Sludge Piping Modification Primary Sedimentation Basins 6-15,
SP19950059,and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids
(Tentative bid date is March 12, 1996).
Summary
The plans and specifications for these projects are now complete and ready for bidding.
The tentative bid date is March 12, 1996. Attached is a staff report that outlines the
work contained in these projects in more detail.
Budget Information
The engineer's estimates for these projects are as follows:
Job No. P141 $ 1,299,000
Job No. P1-03 $ 1,122,000
Job No. Pt-44 $ 700,000
Job No. P2-48 $ 5,027,800
Job No. P2-50 $ 1,126,000
Job No. P2-53-2 $ 600,000
SP19950021 $ 50,000
SP19950059 $ 35,000
Total $ 9,969,800
Staff Recommendation
A. That the PDC Committee recommend approval of the plans and specifications
and any subsequent addenda, and authorize the General Manager to advertise
and receive bids on March 12, 1996.
B. That the PDC Committee authorize award of a construction agreement at the
April 1996 Joint Boards meeting to the lowest responsive bidder in an amount not
to exceed the approved total budgeted amount of$9.969,800. If the low bid is
above the budgeted amount, staff will seek direction from the Directors at the
April 1996 PDC Committee Meeting.
PDC Committee Recommendation
The PDC Committee concurs with staff recommendations.
Executive Committee Recommendation
The Executive Committee concurs with the PDC Committee recommendations.
JIW GOOLIOSM1GBBJM'�,118].W PO
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
W ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
e
Janus 8, 1996 tOBEC EWB1127
ry R.o eax ME
Blxo
FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALRCRMA NIMBI xl
nlm axa.aan
STAFF REPORT
PDC96-04: Consideration of Resolution No. 95-_, approving plans and
specifications for Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers 3, 4, and 5 at
Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-41; Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural
Systems at Plant No. 1, Job No. P143; Seismic Retrofit at Plant No.
1, Job No. P144; Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers D Through Q at
Plant No. 2; Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Plant No.
2, Job No P2-50; Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53-2;
Tunnel Cover Replacement at Billings Tunnel at Plant No. 2,
SP19950021; Sludge Piping Modification Primary Sedimentation
Basins 6-15, SP19960059, and authorizing the General Manager to
establish the date for receipt of bids (Tentative bid date is
March 12, 1996).
Summary
This construction bid package contains: Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers 3, 4, and 5
at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-41, Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Plant No.
1, Job No. P1-43, Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-44, Rehabilitation of
Primary Clarifiers D Through Q at Plant No. 2, Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural
Systems at Plant No. 2, Job No P2-50, and Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2, Job No.
P2-53-2. These projects primarily deal with upgrading facilities and systems to resist
potential damage caused by earthquakes, and provide rehabilitation and upgrade of
existing older primary treatment facilities. These construction projects have been
packaged under one construction agreement due to the similarity of the work, and that
the Districts will save construction management costs associated with only having to
manage one larger contract.
Jobs Nos. P141 and P248
These projects will upgrade existing circular primary clarifiers. These modifications
include safety related items dealing with the replacement of corroded interior walkways,
upgraded hazardous atmosphere monitoring systems and, interior lighting. Upgraded
scum pumping systems will prevent excess water from being delivered to anaerobic
digester systems. Remote operation of the clarifiers will be added via new data
acquisition programmable logic controllers, and the ability to operate the system from
the central computer located in the Operations Center. Also, various other minor
modifications is included.
_o
PDC96-04
January 8, 1996
Page 2
Jobs Nos. P1-43, P1-44, P2-50. and P2-53-2
These projects will provide additional seismic restraint of piping systems, electrical
equipment, buildings, and miscellaneous other structures to minimize damage that
would occur during a major seismic event. This master planned upgrade is a
continuing effort to insure that immediately after a seismic event, the District's facilities
remain on-line, continue to treat wastewater, and provide protection of the public.
Small Projects SP19950021 and SP19950059
These small projects will repair damaged tunnel covers at Plant No. 2, and provide a
piping modification that will allow operators to flush the scum pumping system with
primary sludge. This will lower maintenance and operations costs for the primary
treatment system.
Staff Recommendation
A. That the PDC Committee recommend approval of the plans and specifications
and any subsequent addenda, and authorize the General Manager to advertise
and receive bids on March 12, 1996.
B. That the PDC Committee authorize award of a construction agreement at the
April 1996 Joint Boards meeting to the lowest responsive bidder in an amount
not to exceed the approved total budgeted amount of $9,969,800. If the low bid
is above the budgeted amount, staff will seek direction from the Directors at the
April 1996 PDC Committee Meeting.
JH:JL:gc
JMPG NGIE WM'BFBBM.SR
Y
MAJOR COST TABLE FOR JOB NOS. P1-41 ANDP2 48
DESCRIPTION: Current Current Current Expended To Date:
Budget(3)• Design Costs Construction
Costs (4)•
DESIGN: CONSTR:
Planning & Studies
Consultant's Cost $ 549,408 (1)• $ 549,408 $ 285,000
CSD Design Costs $ 100,000 $ 49,535
Contractor Costs $6,920.592 (5)• $6.326,800 (4)•
CSD Construction Costs $ 125,000
Furnishings and Equipment
(2)•
Agreement Costs
Permit Costs
Contingency@ 10% $ 855,000
Total Costs: $8,550,000 $6,925,743 $ 285,000
'NOTES:
(1) Includes all approved changes to original PSA
(2) Furnishings and equipment are not considered capital project costs and Hence are not
actually a part of the project design and construction costs. The Districts purchases
furniture and equipment after construction is complete under a separate contract.
(3) Includes all approved changes to original budget
(4) Includes all approved changes to original contract
(5) Consultant's estimate of construction cost.
J:\WPDOC�ENG%EXECLIAN98We04(3).TBL
V
MAJOR COST TABLE FOR JOB NOS. P1-43 AND P2-50
DESCRIPTION: Current Current Current Expended To Date:
Budget(3)' Design Costs Construction
Costs (4)'
DESIGN: CONSTR:
Planning & Studies
Consultant's Cost $ 410,000 (1)' $ 405,000 $ 243,000
CSD Design Costs $ 50,000 $ 20,000
Contractor Costs $6,100,000 (5)' $2,248,000 (4)'
CSD Construction Costs $ 255,000
Fumishings and Equipment
(2)'
Agreement Costs
Permit Costs
Contingency @ 10% $ 610,000 $ 239,800
Total Costs: $7,425,000 $2,892,800 $ 263,000
'NOTES:
(1) Includes all approved changes to original PSA
(2) Furnishings and equipment are not considered capital project costs and Hence are not
actually a part of the project design and construction costs. The Districts purchases
furniture and equipment after construction is complete under a separate contract.
(3) Includes all approved changes to original budget
(4) Includes all approved changes to original contract
(5) Consultant's estimate of construction cost.
JAW PDOCT NG\EXECVAN96G6-K2).TBL
f MAJOR COST TABLE FOR JOB NOS. P1-44 AND P2-53
DESCRIPTION: Current Current Current Expended To Date:
Budget (3)• Design Costs Construction
Costs (A
DESIGN: CONSTR:
Planning &Studies
Consultant's Cost $1,997,510 (1)• $1,997,510 $1,455,000
CSD Design Costs $ 330,000 $1,300,000 $ 224,821
Contractor Costs $4,987,490 (5)• $ 950,000 (4)•
CSD Construction Costs $ 110,000
Furnishings and Equipment
(2)'
Agreement Costs
Permit Costs
Contingency @ 10% $ 825,000 $ 95,000
Total Costs: $8,250,000 $4,342,510 $1,679,821
*NOTES:
(1) Includes all approved changes to original PSA
(2) Furnishings and equipment are not considered capital project costs and Hence are not
actually a part of the project design and construction costs. The Districts purchases
furniture and equipment after construction is complete under a separate contract.
(3) Includes all approved changes to original budget
(4) Includes all approved changes to original contract
(5) Consultant's estimate of construction cost.
J:\W PDOCtENGTXECUAN%W"4(1).TBL
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
JANUARY 24, 1996
AGENDA ITEM (11)(b)(4): PDC96-06 Consideration of the following
actions re Demolition of Old Laboratory,
Job No. J-11-2, and Restoration of Old Laboratory for Human Resources
Department, Job No. J-11-2:
(a) Consideration of motion providing for the conversion of the Old
Laboratory, Job No. J-11-1, to Restoration of Old Laboratory for Human
Resources Department, Job No. J-11-2, and providing for funds in the
amount of$375,000 for said project.
(b) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to establish the
date for receipt of bids for Interior Asbestos Removal from Old Laboratory,
Job No. J-11-1A (Tentative bid date is February 13, 1996).
Summary
The Human Resources Department offices are currently located in a trailer complex adjacent to
the Warehouse and Purchasing offices. The complex is old, deteriorated, and no longer has
sufficient office space for Human Resources staff. Staff has investigated two solutions to this
problem. The first alternative is to purchase new trailers with more space, expand the
Administration Building parking lot, and install the trailer complex in the wooded area east of the
Administration Building. The second alternative is to renovate the old Laboratory Building. The
second alternative is the more favorable with respect to providing better working conditions, and
providing a building that can be used for other purposes after permanent Human Resources
facilities are constructed in concert with the long-term personnel facilities. Cost estimates and
conceptual layouts were provided to the Ad Hoc Committee as a basis for developing their
recommendation to the PDC Committee.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Ad Hoc Committee establish a fund of$375,000.00, authorize the
General Manager to award a Professional Services Agreement for design of Restoration of Old
Laboratory for Human Resources Department, Job No. J-11-2, in an amount not to exceed
$30,000.00; and authorize the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids for
Interior Asbestos Removal in Old Laboratory, Job No. J-11-1. The tentative bid dale is
February 6, 1996.
Ad Hoc Recommendation
The Ad Hoc Committee concurs with the recommendation of staff.
PDC Committee Recommendation
k
The PDC Committee concurs with the recommendations of the Ad Hoc Committee, and
recommends the following actions to the Executive Committee, as follows: -
(1) Consideration of motion providing for the conversion of the Old Laboratory, Job
No. J-11-1, to Restoration of Old Laboratory for Human Resources Department,
Job No. J-11-2, and providing for funds in the amount of$375,000 for said project.
(2) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for
receipt of bids for Interior Asbestos Removal from Old Laboratory, Job No. J-11AA
(Tentative bid date is February 13, 1996).
Executive Committee Recommendation to the Joint Boards of Directors
The Executive Committee concurs with the recommendations of the Ad Hoc Committee re
Space Utilization and the PDC Committee.
,:wrooaas wewrvsane.1 -2-
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
-J or GRANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
J
January9, 1996 ,e9AA EWe AVENUE
P.o.WX ell)
MU WMN VALLEY,CAUMANIA 9272OZI27
914111112.0411
Staff Report
PDC96-05: Consideration of Actions from the Ad Hoc Committee Regarding Office
Space for the Human Resources Department.
Summary
The Human Resources Department is housed in trailers that were purchased used in 1988. A
project begun in 1988 to provide permanent Facilities for the Human Resources Department has
led to the present Ad Hoc Committee Re: Space Utilization Study. Which is unlikely to provide
permanent space for the Human Resources Department prior to 1998. The existing trailer
complex has deteriorated and the Human Resources Department has grown. Temporary
relocation of the Safety Division now underway, while helping to relieve the crowding, will not
provide adequate space for the remaining staff. Staff has evaluated purchasing a new trailer
complex verses restoring the old laboratory and using it as temporary office space for the Human
Resources Department.
Trailers could provide the required space, but would not provide soundproofing, important to
many personnel matters. It is most desirable to house the Human Resources staff adjacent to
the Administration Building. The location most likely not to be affected by a future Administration
Building expansion is the wooded vacant lot to the east of the Administration Building. This
location would require cutting down some of the existing old growth pines expanding the
Administration Building Parking lot, and constructing utilities to the proposed trailer complex.
Time could be saved by designing and drafting the trailer and utility layouts in-house, and then
proceeding with a Purchase Contract.
Currently, construction documents are complete to demolish the old laboratory (Job No. J-11-1).
Included in this project is a separate bid item to hire a special subcontractor to do the required
asbestos abatement. The Asbestos Inspection/Sampling and Laboratory Testing Report
prepared for this project recommended removing the asbestos prior to demolition or remodeling.
Since the asbestos removal must be completed prior to either remodeling or demolishing the old
laboratory, the cost of that work is not a factor of either alternative. The amount budgeted for
asbestos removal is $150,000.
Restoration of the old laboratory with minimum changes to the wall layout, would provide several
enclosed offices, a conference room, separate reception area, and a large open area that can be
divided into cubicles.
Staff has completed the preparation of cost estimates for both the restoration of the old
laboratory and the purchase of new office trailers. Cost estimates for the office trailers were
taken from the May 1995 cost estimates prepared in preparation of providing office space for the
Districts Information Technologies Department. Two office trailer manufacturers were contacted
and asked to provided cost estimates to purchase a minimum of 5,000 square feet of office
space. Five thousand square feet would be adequate for Human Resources office space.
B
PDC96-05
January 9, 1996
Page 2
Cost estimates for restoration of the old laboratory were obtained with the assistance of two
architectural/contractor teams. Staff worked directly with the teams to ensure that the scope of
the restoration work was consistent. The construction cost estimates for restoration include
seismic and ADA (handicap access) modifications and a 10% contingency. The costs estimated
for restoration are comparable with those of purchasing trailers.
The aforementioned cost estimates are listed below in a matrix and a copy of the staff
memorandum summarizing the cost estimates for the trailers and the architect/contractor cost
estimates for restoration of the old laboratory are attached.
COST ESTIMATE FOR HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICE SPACE
Restoration of Old Laboratory Purchase of Office Trailers
GKK Corporation/MSC Construction: $337,493.20 Commercial Mobile Systems: $301,960'
KAL Architects/ Peck Jones: $350,900.00 G. E. Modular. $306,709'
Estimate does not include the necessary parking lot construction.
Parking Lot = 7,200 square feet x$5.00/square foot= $36,000
Restoration of the old laboratory is the preferred alternative because it will place Human
Resources next to the Administration Building, provide more privacy, and a better working
environment for the staff, prevent the Districts from having to place office trailers in front of or a
long side the Administration Building, and provide a renovated building that can be used for other
long term uses after Human Resources is moved for the final time to new offices within the
Administration Building (scope and locations yet to be determined).
This project was not included in the 1995-1996 budget. Sufficient funds are available from the
Plant 2 Warehouse Building, Job No. P2-35-2. The budgeted amount for 1995-96 was
$1,400,000. The warehouse project has been scaled down to a new estimated budget of
approximately$500,000. The remaining Plant 2 Warehouse budget is $900,000. Assuming a
total project cost of approximately$375,000 for Human Resources office, the remaining funds
budgeted for Plant 2 Warehouse would be $525,000.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends establishing a fund of$375,000 out of the Job No P2-35-2 budget for
restoration of the old laboratory building for Human Resources office space and authorization of
the General Manager to receive three proposals for design services for restoration of the old
laboratory for an amount not to exceed $30,000 and authorize the General Manger to award a
construction contract for interior asbestos removal in the old laboratory (modified Job No. J-11-1)
to the lowest qualified bidder for an amount not to exceed $150,000.
JCD:jf
JAW PDOC1ENGIEXEOUANNW-Q5.SR
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
JANUARY 24, 1996
AGENDA ITEM (11 )(b)(5): PDC96.06: Consideration of the following
actions relative to Addendum No. 1 to the
Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers to prepare plans
and specifications and to provide construction support services re Standby
Power Reliability Modifications, Job No. J-33 and Ocean Outfall Reliability
Upgrades, Job No. J44, providing for additional design and construction
services:
(a) Consideration of motion to receive, file, and approve the Planning, Design
and Construction Committee certification of the final negotiated fee for said
services.
(b) Consideration of Resolution No. 964, approving Addendum No. 1 to said
agreement with John Carollo Engineers for said additional services on an
hourly rate basis for labor, plus overhead, subconsultant fees, and fixed
profit for an additional amount not to exceed $226,740.00, increasing the
total authorized compensation from $950,252.00 to an amount not to exceed
$1,176.992.00.
Summary
This request is for the approval of Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement
(PSA) dated April 14, 1993 for Standby Power Reliability Upgrades, Job No.J-33 and Ocean
Outfall Reliability Upgrades, Job No. J-34, adding additional construction services. The design
of the Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades, Job No. J-34-1, is the third of three tasks under the
April 1993 PSA.
Proposed Addendum No. 1 to the PSA with John Carollo Engineers, adds $226,740.00 to the
existing $950,250.00 contract for added construction support. The original agreement (which
covered all three tasks) included 820 hours for construction support and 248 hours for
preparation of an Operations and Maintenance manual. The original allocation was based on a
one-year construction period. The current estimate is based on a longer, 18-month construction
period to accommodate necessary sequencing. In addition to providing consultant services for
a longer time, Addendum No. 1 provides added construction support, in accordance with
recommendations by Ernst &Young. The added construction hours will increase time available
for the services previously contracted for, and add assistance with change orders, contract
record drawings, and operation and maintenance training. The added hours also include
allowances needed for engineering consultation during the construction of the surge tower
foundation, a critical part of this project.
Budget Information
�ewvoaoaMawwremnesxvo -1-
MAJORCOSTTABLE
Current Authorized Proposed Expended to
Description Addendum Total Date
Deal n Const. No.1
1.PlenninglDwign/CEOA
Consukant $410,099(1) $ 78,884(1) — $488,783(1) $376.655
Addn. No.l(Construction)
a. Labor Cost $ 76,600
b, Indirect Costs @ 190% $145.540
c. Direct Cost $ 4,600
Total,Addendum No. 1 $228.740 $226,740 —
2. CSDOC Stag $ 60,000 $ 110,000 — $ 170.000 $ 40,500
3.Contractor Costs — $5,600,000 — $5,600,000 —
4. Total $470,099 $5,788,684 $226,740 $6.485,523 $417.155
5. '95-96 Budget Allowence $6,500,000
(1) Portion of Original PEA for Job No. J-34-1
The first task under Jobs Nos. J-33 and J-34, preparation of separate contract documents for
Electrification of Pump Drives at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1.36.1, took the design out
of Secondary Expansion at Plant No. 1 and packaged the work with other projects for bidding.
That work was completed in 1993, a construction contract awarded in December 1993,with the
construction work now nearly complete. The second task was the preparation of a report
entitled, Evaluation of Hydraulic Reliability and Standby Power Requirements. The report was
completed in February 1994 and recommended, among other items, that the rebuilding of the
surge tower on the standby outfall include raising the tower higher than planned in our 1989
Master Plans, and selected a location 400 feet to the south to avoid a seismic fault fracture
found under the existing lower. Because of the change in height and location over that shown
in the 1989 Master Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Supplemental No. 3, to our
program EIR was prepared, circulated, and certified by the Boards of Directors in February
1995. The third task is the preparation of plans and specifications for the rebuilding and
relocation of the existing surge tower on the standby outfall, the subject of the requested action.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with
John Carollo Engineers for Standby Power Reliability Modifications, Job No. J-33; and Ocean
Outfall Reliability Upgrades, Job No. J-34-1, increasing the maximum authorized amount from
$950,252.00 to $1,176,992.00, an increase of$226,740.00.
erwnoonssworsinaeanes.wao -2-
PDC Committee Recommendation
The PDC Committee concurs with the recommendation of staff and recommends consideration
by the Executive Committee and the Joint Boards of Directors.
Executive Committee Reommendation to the Joint Boards of Directors
The Executive Committee concurs with the recommendation of the PDC Committee.
„wvooc�esncwunwem„aswoo 3-
h COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
January 17, 1996
pM e:
p141962-241 t
Boards of Directors
mailing.mress. County Sanitation Districts of
Po. Bcs 612) Orange County
Fountain Valley.Ca g
92728-6127 10844 Ellis Avenue
.uaet aitreea: Fountain Valley, CA 92708
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain whey.CA Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services
92708-701B Agreement with John Carollo Engineers to prepare plans and specifications and to
provide construction support services for Standby Power Reliability Modifications, Job
No. J-33, and Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades, Job No. J-34.
Member
Agendas In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional engineering services, the
• Planning, Design and Construction Committee has negotiated the following fee for Addendum No. 1
Cues to the Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers, providing for construction
Anane,m services related to Standby Power Reliability Modifications,Job No.J-33 ,and Ocean OuBall Reliability
Brea Upgrades,Job No.J-34,on an hourly rate basis,including labor,plus indirect costs,direct costs,and fixed
Buena Para profit in an additional amount not to exceed$226,740.00.
Cypress
Fountain Valley Existing Change per Amended
Fullerten
Hunun9tnn Beach Agreement Addn. No. i Agreement
Irvin. Engineering Services,
Le Habra a Palma (Direct Labor at
Los ammaos Hourly Rates, plus
Newport Beach overhead at 162%),
Orange
Plange not to exceed $821,602.00 $0.00 $821,602.00
Santa Ana
Seal Beach Direct Expenses, not to exceed 21,750.00 4,600.00 26,350.00
shorten
Tuavn
Villa Para Fixed Profit 106,900.00 0.00 106,900.00
yorAa Linda
County of grange Construction Services,
(Direct Labor at
Sanitary Districts Hourly Rates, plus
overhead at 190%).
Costa Mesa not to exceed 0.00 222.140.00 222,140.00
Garden Grove
Midway cry TOTAL CONTRACT,
Water Districts not to exceed 5950.252.00 5226.740.00 $1,176,992.00
Irvine Barth
A otxer waste Bate•and Errronmenrsl Management Apes.Committed re,PmrecGno the F,Mrpnment Since 7954
a
Boards of Directors
Page 2
January 17, 1996
The Planning, Design and Construction Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as
reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for
the consultant.
/s/John J. Collins /s/Sheldon S. Singer
John J. Collins, Chair Sheldon S. Singer, Vice Chair
Planning, Design and Construction Committee Planning, Design and Construction Committee
/s/David A. Ludwin
David A. Ludwin, P.E.
Director of Engineering
Planning, Design and Construction Committee
JDL:sl
eng\exec11en96\96-0].ccl
Y
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
JANUARY 24, 1996
AGENDA ITEM (11 )(b)(6): OMTS95-041 Consideration of the following
actions relative to Compressed Natural Gas
Refueling Station, Job No. P1-51:
(a) Consideration of Resolution No. 96-5, approving Professional Services
Agreement with Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas) for
construction management services for Compressed Natural Gas Refueling
Station, Job No. P1.51, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, for
an amount not to exceed $64,500.
(2) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to solicit bids re
Purchase of Equipment for Compressed Natural Gas Refueling Station, Job
No. P1-51A; and authorizing the General Manager to award a purchase
order contract to the lowest bidder for an amount not to exceed
$399,300.00, plus applicable taxes and freight.
Summary
In September 1995,the Boards authorized$835,374.00 for the construction of a compressed
natural as refueling facility. Included in that request was$69,100,00 for construction
management services. This is broken down further as $34,500.00 for construction
management,$20,000.00 for project management, $10,000.00 for quality assurance and
$5,000.00 for purchasing services. SoCalGas was requested to submit a proposal for those
services because of their expertise with compressed natural gas refueling station design and
installation. The SoCalGas proposal to provide those services is $64,500.00.
In order to meet the schedule of having the Compressed Natural Gas Refueling Station
operational at or near the time that Pima Gro's biosolids trucks are ready to accept the fuel, the
Districts will need to competitively bid and award a contract for the purchase of the long lead
items (i.e., compressors, dryers, and storage vessel).
Included in the request for$835,374.00 is$620,500.00 for equipment. Costs budgeted for long
lead items is$399,300.00($363,000.00 plus a 10% contingency), not including all applicable
taxes and freight.
a
Staff Recommendation
Consideration of the following actions relative to Compressed Natural Gas Refueling Station,
Job No. P1-51, as follows:
(1) Consideration of Resolution No. 96- , approving Professional Services Agreement with
Southern California Gas Company(SoCalGas)for Construction Management Services
for Compressed Natural Gas Refueling Station, Job No. P11-51, in an amount not to
exceed$64,500.
(2) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to solicit bids and award a
purchase order contract to the lowest bidder re Purchase of Equipment for Compressed
Natural Gas Refueling Station, Job No. Pt-51A,for an amount not to exceed
$399,300.00, plus applicable taxes and freight. (This is a request for a waiver of
Section I.A.1 of Exhibit A to Resolution No. 95-62.)
PDC Committee Recommendation
The PDC Committee concurs with staff recommendations.
Executive Committee Recommendation to the Joint Boards of Directors
The Executive Committee concurs with the PDC Committee recommendation.
J\N9pOC+13StG9S11Pw?fl1194 NNE
. a
a
January 4, 1996 ..
CJ p
STAFF REPORT
OMTS95-041: Consideration of the following actions relative to Compressed Natural
Gas Refueling Station, Job No. Pl-51:
(1) Consideration of Resolution No. 96-_, approving Professional Services
Agreement with Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas) for Construction
Management Services for Compressed Natural Gas Refueling Station, Job No. P1-
51, in an amount not to exceed $64,500.
(2) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to solicit bids and
award a purchase order contract to the lowest bidder re Purchase of Equipment
for Compressed Natural Gas Refueling Station, Job No. P1-51A, for an amount not
to exceed $399,300.00, plus applicable taxes and freight. (This is a request for a
waiver of Section I.A.1 of Resolution No. 95-62, Exhibit A.)
Summary
At the September OMTS Committee meeting, staff presented the proposal that was submitted
to the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) for some of the AB 2766 funds.
On Friday, September 15, 1995, we received notification from the SCAQMD that our proposal
was one of two proposals they would be funding. In November 1995, we received verbal
notification that the SCAQMD Board had approved our proposal.
The proposal was for CSDOC to build and operate a compressed natural gas (CNG) refueling
station with design assistance from SoCalGas, Pima Gro to retrofit ten of their sludge hauling
trucks with combination diesel and CNG engines designed and built by PSA and for Bectel to be
hired for emissions testing and reporting. Attachment"A" shows a breakdown of the project
funding and project costs per task.
The Directors will recall that the Districts agreed to build, own and operate a compressed
natural gas (CNG) refueling station for use by not only Pima Gro, but, also the Districts' future
CNG powered fleet, the cities, school districts and the public. The cost for this station is
estimated not to exceed $835,374.00. The Directors authorized the allocation of these funds.
Included in this cost was $620,500.00 for the procurement of the equipment. Attachment "B" is
a copy of the budget estimate to which staff will be held accountable.
Most of the equipment called out in the attachment, is Commercially available and will be
purchased in accordance with the Districts' policies and procedures later in the year. However,
some of the items, such as the compressor(s), dryers, and storage vessel are not commercially
available and have a long lead time (in excess of six months).
CSDOC 0 P 0.S..8127 0 FPunla.n Valley,CA 92 72 8-812 7 0 (714)962-2411
Staff believes that waiting to bid these long lead items will compromise the schedule and will not
allow us to have the station ready when the trucks are ready to accept the fuel. Staff also
believes that there are numerous manufacturers of this equipment and that this equipment can
and should be competitively bid. The oompressor(s), dryers, and storage vessel are estimated
at $363,000.00, plus 10% contingency, totaling $399,300.00. This estimate excludes taxes and
freight.
Also included in the $835,374.00 is $69,500.00 identified as construction management costs.
This is further broken down as $34,500.00 for construction management, $20,000.00 for project
management, $10,000.00 for quality assurance, and $5,000.00 for purchasing services.
For their part in the proposal, SoCalGas agreed to provide the design of the station and will
prepare the plans and specifications. We will then bid the job (consistent with Districts' policies)
and will bring the results back to the PDC Committee for action.
SoCalGas has installed nearly 50 natural gas refueling stations to dale, with plans to build 30
additional stations at SoCalGas bases during the next six years. Additionally, they have actively
managed several customer-funded turnkey operations, including the U.S. Navy, which required
technical and management assistance to permit, develop and operate their three natural gas
stations. Their experience building natural gas fueling stations developed over the last three
years has resulted in many industry technological advances and established the benchmark for
natural gas station design.
Staff believes that there is merit to using the experience gained by SoCalGas and, as a result,
requested a proposal from them to provide services for design management and construction
management. On December 6, 1995, we received their proposal. They are proposing to
perform the construction management, design management, quality assurance and purchasing
services for a cost of$64,500.00. SoCal Gas has provided with their proposal a breakdown of
services to be provided and their relative hours and costs. That cost breakdown is included as
Attachment°C°. The proposal to perform these services is below the cost budgeted.
Staff is requesting a waiver of Section I.A.1. of Exhibit A to Resolution No. 95-62, which limits
the General Manager's authority for purchases to $49,999, for this urgent one-time purchase of
equipment.
Recommendations
1. Consideration of Resolution No. 96-_approving Professional Services Agreement with
Southern California Gas Company(SoCalGas) for construction management services
for Compressed Natural Gas Refueling Station,Job No. P1-51, in an amount not to
exceed $64,500.00.
2. Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to solicit bids and award a
purchase order contract to the lowest bidder re Purchase of Equipment for Compressed
Natural Gas Refueling Station, Job No. PI-51A, for an amount not to exceed
$399,300.00, plus applicable taxes and freight. (This is a request for a waiver of Section
I.A.1 of Resolution No. 95-62, Exhibit A.)
JD:gc
J:\W PD0C\ENG\E%ECOAN96\95-041 S R
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
AI ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
ELLI9
AVENUE
ATTACHMENT"A" +9944 v.9 BOX 0127.99x 127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92729-9127
COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS REFUELING STATION 0141992¢411
FUNDING AND COSTS BREAKDOWN
PROJECT FUNDING
Source Cash In-Kind Total
CSDOC $ 835,374 $ 0 $ 834,374
So Cal Gas 0 93,500 93,500
Prim Gro 192,700 0 192,700
PSA 0 838,250 838,250
Emissions Testing* 0 80,000 80,000
AOMD 447.662 0 447,662
TOTAL $1,475,736 $1,011,750 $2,487,486
The$80,000 shown as an in-kind contribution is based upon the US DOE authorizing West
Virginia University(UWV) to conduct emission tests using one of theWWV's transportable
emission testing facilities.
COST BREAKDOWN BY TASK
Task AOMD Funds Match Funds Total
Task 1: Site Selection $ 0 $ 4,000 $ 4,000
Task 2: Engines and Vehicles 297,700 1,027,700 1.325,400
Task 3: Refueling Facilities 49,338 925,462 974,800
Task 4: Field Test & Data Collection 33,840 3,250 37,090
Task 5: Emission Testing 9,627 80,000 89,627
Task 6: Data Analysis & Dissemination 25,935 0 25,935
Task 7: Project Management 30,560 0 30,560
TOTAL $447,000 $2,040,412 $2,487,412
JCD:jac
JAW PC C C\ENG1EXECVAN9el9M1dH A
1
ATTACHMENT "B"
NGV Fueling Station Cost Estimate
CSDOC NGV FUELING STATION
PROPOSAL COST ESTIMATE
Components Estimate SoCalGas
I _I d
EQUIPMENT
Electric Transformer E 14,000
Electric Switchgear 30,000
Meter Set Assembly 6,000 S5,000
Bus Offloading Panel 1,000
Dryer 40,000
Compressors-Two 500 scan compressors 290,000
Compressor Enclosure 40,000
ASME Storage Vessel 33,000
Card Reader 16,000
CNG Dispenser- 1 CSDOC I 1 Public Retail 85,000
Minor Components 12,000
Sales Tax(8.25%) 47,500
Freight 7,000
Subtotal $620,500
CONSTRUCTION
Construction Management $34,500
Electric Tie-in 5,000
Gas Tie-in 50,000 $50,000
Construction 115,000
Subtotal $204,500
ENGINEERING
Design E 35.000 $35,000
Permitting and Project Management 20,000
Quality Assurance 5.000
Purchasing 5,000
Subtotal $ 65,000
SUBTOTAL ALL COMPONENTS $890,000
Contingency(10 percent) 84,800
TOTAL* $974,800 $90,000
SoCalGas In-kind Contributions (90,000)
SCAQMD Grant (50,000)
Net 834,11
R0Wh 0fdw or MW tuae Eeam mdudea./-10 percent to axwrd for eXo-spedric Eeefan rabto'aaeds.
ATTACIDENT "C"
CSDOC NGV Fueling Station
SOCALGAS CONSULTING SERVICE PROPOSAL
COST ESTIMATE
SoCal ConL Total Other Total
Labor Labor Labor 9 S
hrs he S
CONSTRUCTION';-
Construction Management
Prepare connector bid proposal 20 0 1,50 0 1,50
Jab walk and contractor selection 20 0 1,50 0 1,50
On-site construction supervision 230 0 17,25 0 17.25
Interface with CSDOC aon$Inrction teem am!Inspector
during construction 60 3.750, 0 3.750.
Enpinoenng support for construction 10 01 7501 0 750
Sta",up and dab obtain CSDOC final approval 75 0 5,650 0 6,650
Prepare As Butit drawings; 40 15 4,100 0 4,100
Subtotal 445 15 34.500 0 34 500
Permitting and Project Management
File for EIR exemption-seems no modifications 33 0 2 476 0 2,475
Secure Rre Dept. operating permit 26 0 1-9 LS 0 1 92S
Prepare for CSDOC Board approval-3 times 35 0 2.626 0 2.625
Provide project management support with CSDOC 55 Of 4.125, 0 4.125.
Prepare O&M manuals 70 0 5,26 0 6,25
Provide station and vehicle training 48 0 3.60 0 3.600
Subtotal 267 0 20,000 0 20,000
Quality Assurance
Compressor- Inspect at factory and witness performance
test prior to shipment. 36 0 2.70 1,800 4.500
Dis nsers-Inspect on arrival 1 0 75 0 75
Gas Dryer-Inspect on arrival 2 0 150 0 150
Storage Vessel$-Impact on arrival 11 0 60 0 50
Prior /Seg.Panel -Inspect on arrival 1 Of 50 0 50
PRVb 6 Misc.Equip.-Inspect on arrival 2 0 176 0 175
Subtotal 43 0 3,200 1,80 5,00
Purchasin
Maim e4p.bid package preparation 16 0 1,20 0 1.20
Review bids and provide recommendations 6 0 450 0 460
Assist in preparing purchase orders for all misc.equip 0 36 2.70 0 2,700
Interface with vendors an equipment purchase orders as
needed 6 3 650 0 650
Subtotal 28 39 5,00 0 5,00
-r` TOTAt:< 9xk6 M-s62 776 :d?e1t„80 , „86 590
OsG "n;:, M•IOtCdi ., '1 a>C. . 941k6PUMU
PROJECTTOTAL 99,500
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
JANUARY 24, 1996
AGENDA ITEM 01)(b)(7): FAHR ITEM f4) Consideration of motion
to receive and file monthly investment
report regarding performance
monitoring of PIMCO.
Summary
As previously reported,both PIMCO and Mellon signed their final contracts and began managing our
funds in September 1995.
Month-end reports are available from PIMCO on the sixth day after calendar month-end. Thus,they are
not available for the regular FAHR Committee mailing, but are distributed at the meeting. Because there
was no meeting in December,the November report is attached. The PIMCO reports mirror our Investment
Policy.
The Investment Policy adopted by the Joint Boards on May 24, 1995,includes reporting requirements as
listed down the PIMCO Monthly Report for the'Ltquid Operating Monies'and for the'Long-Term
Operating Monies' All of the Investment Policy requirements are being complied with and performance to
date exceeds the index rates.
Balances
CSDOC Nov.30, 1995
State of Calif. LAW $11.443,353
Bank of America 241,095
PIMCO-Short-term Portfolio 60,356.395
PIMCO-Long-term Portfolio 234.421,057
District 11 GO Bond Fund 11,886
Debt Service Reserves @ Trustees 33,881435
435
$340.357,221
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends the Committee receive this report and the supplemental information which will be
available at the meeting,approve and forward the reports to the Executive Committee and the Joint
Boards.
FAHR Committee Recommendation to Executive Committee
The FAHR Committee recommends the Executive Committee receive,file and forward the reports to the
Joint Boards.
Executive Committee Recommendation to the Joint Boards of Directors
The Executive Committee concurs with the recommendation of the FAHR Committee.
rvmoocatumeuuremr�a�wvo
January 17, 1996
CSDOC
TOTAL CASH & INVESTMENTS
HN
E
D. dc91 1m91 PoO ..Y]l J,.dO JWy]I Aupol S11. Oct1.
J\WPOCCIFIWRANP PC WGTARR, 8 EC.MTREARiN
MONTHLY REPORT
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING
(for the month ending November 30, 1995)
Liquid Operating Monies
14.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value: $60,814,921
Historical Cost: $60,826,896
14.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: .15
Of Index: .25
14.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact (gain/loss) of 1% Change: $91,222 (.15%)
14.1.4 REVERSE REPOS % of Portfolio in Reverse Repos:
(see attached schedule) 0%
14.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY % of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 88%
14.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: AA
14.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING % of Portfolio Below "A": 0%
14.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance"
14.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Portfolio Total Rate of Return:
1 Month: .49
3 Months: ------
12 Months: ------
Year-to-Date: -----
Index Total Rate of Return:
1 Month: .44
n1=rkm1rrymwr1ocnmWom203.1195
MONTHLY REPORT
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING
(for the month ending November 30, 1995)
Long Term Operating Monies
14.1.1 1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value: $239,502,487
Historical Cost: $237,004,461
14.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 2.15
Of Index: 2.40
14.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact (gain/loss) of 1% Change: $5,149,303 (2.15%)
14.1.4 REVERSE REPOS % of Portfolio in Reverse Repos:
(see attached schedule) 0%
14.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY % of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: NA
14.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: AA
14.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING % of Portfolio Below "A": 0%
14.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance"
14.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Portfolio Total Rate of Return:
1 Month: 1.24
3 Months: ------
12 Months: ------
Year-to-Date: ------
Index Total Rate of Return:
1 Month: 1.07
r:Imarkwlrrymou�locmdtamZ03.!!95
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
JANUARY 24, 1996
AGENDA ITEM (11)(b)(8): FAMR96-01 Consideration of the following
actions recommended by AIG Financial
Products Corp., for replacement of Letter of Credit, Refunding Certificates of
Participation, Series 1992, as follows:
(a) Consideration of the following resolutions, approving Substitute Standby Certificate
Purchase Agreement with Barclays Bank, and authorizing staff to take all necessary
actions re replacement of the Standby Letter of Credit:
District No. Resolution No.
1 96-6-1
2 96-7-2
3 96-6-3
5 96-9-5
6 96-10.6
7 96-11-7
11 96-12-11
(b) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to retain the services of a bond counsel
firm for the transaction, as recommended by General Counsel, in an amount not to
exceed $25,000, to be reimbursed to the Districts by AIG; and, authorizing the
General Manager to execute said agreement, approved as to form by General
Counsel.
(c) Consideration of motion directing staff to submit all necessary documents for this
transaction to the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3,5,
6, 7 & 11, at the January 24, 1996 meeting for execution.
Summary
AIG Financial Products Corp. (AIG), is the swap provider for the Series 1992 Refunding COPS,
wherein AIG pays the Districts a floating interest rate equal to the interest rate on the COPS,
and the Districts pays AIG a fixed interest rate. AIG has served the Districts with a demand
letter directing termination of the existing Standby Letter of Credit Agreement of The Industrial
Bank of Japan, in accordance with the Liquidity Guarantee Agreement. AIG has designated
Barclays Bank to provide the replacement Facility, in the form of a Standby Certificate Purchase
Agreement.
The Liquidity Guarantee Agreement between AIG and the Districts permits AIG to demand the
termination and replacement of the Letter of Credit(LOC)when the short-term rating of the LOC
provider falls below"A-1+" (S&P) or"VMIG-1" (Moody's), which is the case with the rating of the
Industrial Bank of Japan.
AIG is directing this LOC replacement because securities such as the Districts' 1992 Series
Refunding COPS, supported by the LOC from The Industrial Bank of Japan, have been pricing
at a premium,whereas securities supported by liquidity facilities provided by non-Japanese
banks are pricing without the same premium. AIG is in the process of replacing the Japanese
LOCs which support a number of securities issued by other public agencies in California.
The LOC substitution for the 1992 Series Refunding COPS is in the mutual best interest of the
Districts and AIG.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends the FAHR Committee approve AIG Financial Products Corporation's
recommended actions above.
FAHR Committee Recommendation to Executive Committee
The Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee recommends the Executive
Committee approve AIG's recommended actions above.
Executive Committee Recommendation to Joint Boards of Directors
The Executive Committee concurs with the recommendation of the FAHR Committee.
nxmoxsanraeunxeentsawao
A IG Financial Products Corp. 04M
IX NYM Fym.W"a .T06990 December 5. 1995
i2031222-4700 1W N 24e.SWnP
Fax:p031222-aa80 U=910.2a091a2 <IG FFC
Dane f.Spenrs.Esq.
Rourke.Woodruff&Sumd!in
70t South Parker Street
Orange,California 92668
Cowry Saturation Districts Nos. 1.23.5,6.7 and 11 of Orange County.California
Refunding Conificates of Pmtidoadon.1992 Series
Dear Ms.Spence:
Reference is made to your letter of December 4th to me requesting a written sxnu-uxnt of the grounds on
which A1G Financial Products Corn. direct;termination of the existing Standby Agreement of MmIndusttial Bank
of Japaa.Limited. Please note that while under die Liquidity Guamnry.44reemcnt by and among the Districts and us
no such sra==of grounds!s required in order for us to direct termination of the existing Standby Agreement.
please note tbat we are directing this replacement because socurium.such as the Certificates,supported by liquidity
facilities as provided by the Industrial Bank of Japan.Limited have.particularly during 1995,been priced at a
pie mam which is not reflected in the pricing of simitar securides supported by liquidity facilities of non-Japanese
banks. Since the Bank wrote the initial facility in December of 1992, the long-term debt ratings of The Industrial
Bank of Japan,Limited have been reduced to the A category from each of Moody's and Standard&Poor's and the
shorr-term rating of Standard&Poor's of fBJ and of the Ceatificares has been reduced from A-1+m A-1. 1 would
submit that this substitutionisin Wemnmal bescimerestoftheD'utricts andof AlG.PhtanciaLPtudnasCarp-
I hope the foregoing is helpful for your purposes. As I discussed with you today,keeping on the agenda for
the Joint Board meeting of December 13 is crucial for the substitution of Barclays to occur by year-end.
veryyAttrruly yoms,
"I
cc:Thomas L.Woodruff,Esq. Francis 1.Coughlin,Jr.
Steven Kozak
—yip's _ --' ^;i,rinnN� ,flr7h17hII� `I7 Wdii:FO 56, 90 :3C
i
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA APPROVING THE FORM OF
AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND
DELIVERY OF A STANDBY CERTIFICATE
PURCHASE AGREEMENT, APPROVING THE
SUBSTITUTION THEREOF FOR AN EXISTING
STANDBY AGREEMENT AND AUTHORIZING THE
EXECUTION OF NECESSARY DOCUMENTS AND
CERTIFICATES AND RELATED ACTIONS
WHEREAS, pursuant to a Trust Agreement, dated as of October 1, 1992 (the "Trust
Agreement"),by and among State Street Bank and Trust Company of California NA,as trustee
(the 'Trustee"), and County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County,
California (the "Participating Districts"), the Participating Districts caused to be executed and
delivered $160,600,000 aggregate principal amount of variable rate Refunding Certificates of
Participation, 1992 Series(the"Certificateel;
WHEREAS, in order to provide for fixed interest payments with respect to the
Certificates,the Participating Districts entered into an Interest Rate Swap Agreement, dated as of
October 1, 1992,with AIG Financial Products Corp. ("AIG");
WHEREAS, in order to provide liquidity support for the purchase of tendered
Certificates, the Participating Districts entered into a Letter of Credit and Reimbursement
Agreement, dated as of October 1, 1992(the'TBJ Standby Agreement%with The Industrial Bank
of Japan,Limited,Los Angeles Agency;
WHEREAS, in order to provide assurance as to the liquidity support for the purchase of
tendered Certificates after expiration of the IBJ Standby Agreement, the Participating Districts
entered into a Liquidity Guaranty Agreement,dated as of October 1, 1992 (the"Liquidity Guaranty
Agreement',with AIG;
WHEREAS,pursuant to the Liquidity Guaranty Agreement,AIG has the right,under the
circumstances described therein, to direct the Participating Districts to terminate the IBJ Standby
Agreement prior to the expiration thereof,and AIG has so directed;
WHEREAS, AIG has proposed that the liquidity support for the purchase of tendered
Certificates be provided by Barclays Bank PLC, New York Branch ('Barclays"), pursuant to a
Standby Certificate Purchase Agreement by and among the Participating Districts,the Trustee and
Barclays (such Standby Certificate Purchase Agreement, in the form presented to this meeting,
with such changes, insertions and omissions as are made pursuant to this Resolution, being
referred to herein as the'Barclays Standby Agieement'D;
WHEREAS,there has been prepared and submitted to this meeting a form of the Barclays
Standby Agreement;
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Agreement for Acquisition and Construction, dated as of
December 1, 1992, by and among the Participating Districts,County Sanitation District No. 1 of
Orange County,California(the"District")is designated as the Representative District(as defined
therein)for the Participating Districts;and
r
WHEREAS,all acts,conditions and things required by the laws of the State of California
to exist, to have happened and to have been performed precedent to and in connection with the
consummation of the transactions authorized hereby do exist, have happened and have been
performed in regular and due time,form and manner as required by law, and the District is now
duly authorized and empowered,pursuant to each and every requirement of law, to consummate
such transactions for the purpose,in the manner and upon the terms herein provided;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE TT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County,California:
Section 1. All of the recitals herein contained are true and correct and the Board so finds.
Section 2. The form of Barclays Standby Agreement,in substantially the form presented
to this meeting and made a part hereof as though set forth in full herein,is hereby approved, and
the Chairperson of the Board, or such other member of the Board as the Chairperson may
designate, the General Manager of the District and the Director of Finance of the District
(collectively,the"Authorized Officers') are hereby authorized and directed,for and in the name
and on behalf of the District, to execute and deliver the Barclays Standby Agreement in
substantially said form, with such changes therein as the Authorized Officer executing the same
may require or approve, such approval to be conclusively evidenced by the execution and delivery
thereof.
Section 3. The termination of the IBJ Standby Agreement and the substitution therefor of
the Barclays Standby Agreement is hereby approved and the Authorized Officers are hereby
authorized and directed,for and in the name and on behalf of the District, on its own behalf and as
Representative District on behalf of the Participating Districts,to take such actions and to execute
and deliver such notices,certificates and representations as are necessary or appropriate to effect
such termination and substitution.
Section 4. The officers and employees of the District are hereby authorized and directed,
jointly and severally, to do any and all things which they may deem necessary or appropriate in
order to consummate the transactions herein authorized and otherwise to carry out,give effect to
and comply with the terms and intent of this Resolution
Section 5. All actions heretofore taken by the officers and employees of the District with
respect to the transactions herein authorized above are hereby approved,confirmed and ratified.
Section 6. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption
PASSED and ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1
of Orange County,California on January 24, 1996.
-2-
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
JANUARY 24, 1996
AGENDA ITEM (11 )(b)(9): FAHR96.02 Consideration of motion
authorizing staff to issue a purchase
order to AmeriData for Four Compaq
Server-Class Computers
(Specification No. E-262R-2), for use
as Districts-wide network servers, for
a total amount not to exceed
$136,875.00, plus sales tax and 1%
CMAS fees.
Summary
The Districts presently support office automation applications (word processing,
spreadsheets, etc.) from six Novell 3.12 file servers. Each department has its own
server with the following exceptions; Administration shares Engineering's server and
Purchasing shares Human Resources' server.
Sharing of data, applications, printers and other resources across the Districts' network
has worked adequately in the past but has become very cumbersome with the Novell
servers. This is due to the fact that Novell 3.12 is designed as a "departmental" server
rather than an "enterprise" server. The Districts need an enterprise-wide network
operating system and the appropriate hardware platform to support it.
Staff recognized that the existing Novell servers would not scale up in order to support
present and future computer-related services and connectivity requirements. These
future services include E-mail, modem pool sharing, group scheduling, desktop faxing,
document tracking and automatic document archival.
Besides hosting standard office applications, the new network must also allow any
desktop computer to connect to a variety of dedicated server computers. These servers
include the Plant Automation, Maintenance Management, Laboratory Information and
the new Financial Information systems being selected.
Based on journal reviews, GartnerGroup projections and technical specifications staff
has determined that the Microsoft NT Server software package meets all present and
foreseeable requirements.
In conjunction with consultants from Quickstart of Newport Beach, staff did a review of
existing and future applications in order to size the hardware. Based on this review,
four server-class PCs will be adequate to support the Districts' needs. Details
concerning these PCs may be found in the appendices.
Staff Recommendation
An October 25, 1995, Board resolution authorized the Districts to purchase computers
through the California Multiple Awards Schedule (CMAS). In accordance with CMAS
regulations, it is not necessary to go through the bid process if purchases are being
made through the CMAS.
Staff recommends that the purchase be awarded to AmeriData. AmeriData was
selected since it is an authorized Compaq CMAS distributer with whom the Districts has
had some business experience. In addition, AmeriData has an Orange County office.
The brand of computer selected was Compaq. It was selected based on it being a
GartnerGroup recommended Tier 1lrier 2 vendor and the only major manufacturer with
a rack-mounted configuration with the features required by the NT Server
implementation planned.
Staff recommends award of a purchase order to AmeriData for$135,875 (not including
lax). Payment of a one percent (1%) State of California CMAS fee of$1,464.05 is also
required. Staff is also requesting authorization to executelapprove said purchase order.
FAHR Committee Recommendation to Executive Committee
The Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee recommends the
Executive Committee approve staffs recommendation to award a purchase order to
AmeriData (Specification No. E-262R-2)for$135,875 (not including tax and 1% CMSA
fees)for purchase of four(4) Compaq server-class computers for use as Districts-wide
local area network servers.
Executive Committee Recommendation to Joint Boards of Directors
The Executive Committee concurs with the recommendation of the FAHR Committee.
,r.�vmoonesuc�eiuwensc.wro -2-
January 10, 1996
STAFF REPORT
FAHR96-02: Consideration of a motion to purchase four(4) Compaq server-
class computers for use as Districts-wide network servers
from AmeriData (Specification No. E-262R-2) for a total cost of
$135,875 not including tax and 1% CMAS fees.
Summary
The Districts presently support office automation applications (word processing,
spreadsheets, etc.) from six Novell 3.12 file servers. Each department has its own
server with the following exceptions; Administration shares Engineering's server and
Purchasing shares Human Resources' server.
Sharing of data, applications, printers and other resources across the Districts' network
has worked adequately in the past but has become very cumbersome with the Novell
servers. This is due to the fact that Novell 3.12 is designed as a "departmental" server
rather than an "enterprise" server. The Districts needs an enterprise-wide network
operating system and the appropriate hardware platform to support it.
Staff recognized that the existing Novell servers would not scale up in order to support
present and future computer-related services and connectivity requirements. These
future services include E-mail, modem pool sharing, group scheduling, desktop faxing,
document tracking and automatic document archival.
Besides hosting standard office applications, the new network must also allow any
desktop computer to connect to a variety of dedicated server computers. These servers
include the Plant Automation, Maintenance Management, Laboratory Information and
the new Financial Information systems being selected.
Based on journal reviews, GartnerGroup projections and technical specifications staff
has determined that the Microsoft NT Server software package meets all present and
foreseeable requirements.
In conjunction with consultants from Quickstart of Newport Beach, staff did a review of
existing and future applications in order to size the hardware. Based on this review,
four server-class PCs will be adequate to support the Districts' needs. Details
concerning these PCs may be found in the appendices.
CSDM n G.D.Bo•9172 n Fnunteln Vellev CA 92729.9127 "Tel r1111$M.7411 "F4x 17141984.9954
FAHR96-02
Page 2
January 10, 1996
Budget Considerations
The Districts have budgeted $340,000 for Network System Integration in the 1995-1996
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund.
Technical Criteria
The four Microsoft NT servers are Compaq 133Mhz Pentium computers. They are
identical to each other except for the amounts of Random Access Memory (RAM) and
disk drive space. The amount of RAM and disk drive space depends on the intended
function of the particular server.
Compaq was selected as a computer vendor for the following reasons:
1. Compaq is a GartnerGroup Tier 1/Tier 2 vendor and builds a high-quality, reliable
product.
2. Compaq is the only Tier 1lrier 2 vendor manufacturing rack-mount computers.
This is important since floor space is at a premium in the computer room.
3. Compaq has the majority of the Intel-based server market.
In order to minimize downtime, a number of fail-safe/redundant features are
incorporated into the servers. These features are:
1. Error Correcting RAM -This hardware allows the detection and correction of
errors in RAM on the fly.
2. Disk Mirroring - Each of the server's system disk will be protected by a technique
called "mirroring." Mirroring provides an active duplicate of the system disk. If
the system drive crashes control is transferred immediately to the standby disk
without interrupting services.
3. RAID-5 Drives - RAID stands for"Redundant Array of Inexpensive Disks." This
technology allows a series of disks to be treated as a single large disk. If one of
the component drives fails, the other disks in the array take over its function and
service continues without interruption.
4. Dual Power Supplies -This option allows the servers to be powered from two
sources.
FAHR96-02
Page 3
January 10, 1996
Staff Recommendation
An October 25th Board resolution authorized the Districts to purchase computers
through the California Multiple Awards Schedule (CMAS). In accordance with CMAS
regulations, it is not necessary to go through the bid process if purchases are being
made through the CMAS.
Staff recommends that the purchase be awarded to AmeriData. AmeriData was
selected since it is an authorized Compaq CMAS distributer with whom the Districts has
had some business experience. In addition, AmeriData has an Orange County office.
Staff recommends award of a purchase order to AmeriData for$135,875 (not including
tax). Payment of a one percent (1%) State of California CMAS fee of$1,464.05 is also
required. Staff is also requesting authorization to execute/approve said purchase order.
J MPDOQFlMGRANEIFPOMQTMR881..TA RVfB RFAMRB W Oflglmto M.H m;Dept.Hd.S.Hw
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
JANUARY 24, 1996
AGENDA ITEM (11 )(b)(10): FAHR96-03 Consideration of
Resolution No. 96-13, amending
Resolution No. 95-105, authorizing
the establishment of provisions for
Programmers covered by the
Professional Employees MOU for
standby and callback pay.
Summary
As automation of the treatment plants has progressed, demands upon the Plant Automation
Group in the Information Technology Department have increased substantially during off-hours.
At the present time, staff Programmers work an average of 18 hours of overtime per week, and
are called back to work after having left the plant an average of five to seven times a month.
Callback situations typically involve assisting the Maintenance Department in solving problems
related to plant automation instrumentation. With few exceptions, this overtime occurs during
system modification or installation. Such instances are expected to generally decrease
beginning twelve to twenty-four months from now.
While the Programmer classification is in the Professional Employees Group, employees in that
class are non-exempt according to Fair Labor Standards Act(FLSA) guidelines. The
Professional Employees Memorandum of Understanding does not have a Standby or Callback
pay provision to provide authority for properly compensating Programmers who are called back
to work in accordance with the callback provisions of the FLSA. Employees entitled to Standby
pay typically volunteer for such duty and are on standby for a period of one week.
Both Standby and Callback pay is provided to the Operations and Maintenance employees that
Programmers work with, and is appropriate compensation for being required to return to work
once the regular workday has ended and the
employee has left the plant and for being available for immediate return to work. Programmers
who are placed on standby status or who are called back to work should also be entitled to
these pay bonuses.
Budget Information
The total annual cost of implementing Callback and Standby pay for Programmers is $11,950.
Staff Recommendation
Extend the Standby and Callback Pay provisions in other Memoranda of Understanding to the
classification of Programmer in the Professional Group.
FAHR Committee Recommendation to Executive Committee
The Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee recommends the Executive
Committee approve staffs recommendation to extend the Standby and Callback Pay provisions
in other Memoranda of Understanding to the classification of Programmer in the Professional
Employees Group.
Executive Committee Recommendation to the Joint Boards of Directors
The Executive Committee concurs with the recommendation of the FAHR Committee.
n
January 10, 1996
STAFF REPORT
FAHR96-03: Standby and Callback Pay for Programmers
BACKGROUND
As automation of the treatment plants has progressed, demands upon the Plant
Automation Group in the Information Technology Department have increased
substantially during off-hours. At the present time, staff Programmers work an average
of 18 hours of overtime per week, and are called back to work after having left the plant
an average of five to seven times a month. Callback situations typically involve
assisting the Maintenance Department in solving problems related to plant automation
instrumentation. With few exceptions, this overtime occurs during system modification
or installation. Such instances are expected to generally decrease beginning twelve to
twenty-four months from now.
While the Programmer classification is in the Professional Employees Group,
employees in that class are non-exempt according to Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
guidelines. The Professional Employees Memorandum of Understanding does not have
a Standby or Callback pay provision to provide authority for properly compensating
Programmers who are called back to work in accordance with the callback provisions of
the FLSA Employees entitled to standby pay typically volunteer for such duty and are
on standby for a period of one week.
Callback pay is currently provided to the Operations and Maintenance employees that
Programmers work with, and is appropriate compensation for being required to return to
work once the regular workday has ended and the employee has left the plant.
Operations and Maintenance employees are also entitled to standby pay when required
to be available for immediate return to work. Since Programmers who are assigned
standby duty are also required to carefully manage their time away from work,
entitlement to standby pay is appropriate and equitable.
RECOMMENDATION
In order to provide employees classified as Programmer appropriate compensation for
being assigned to standby status on a regular basis, and to comply with the callback
provisions of the FLSA, it is recommended that the following provisions be added to the
Professional Memorandum of Understanding through a Side Letter of Agreement.
Callback Pay. When an employee is called back to work by Districts' management
without prior notice, and the employee has completed their normal work shift and left the
work station, or when prior notice is given but the work begins on the same day
CSOOC 0 P.O.Box 8127 n Founro In Valley,CA 92728.8122 ^Tel. (714)962-2411 0 FAX (714) 962-3954
FAHR96-03
Page 2
January 10, 1996
at least three hours after completion of the regular shift, the employee shall receive a
minimum of three hours of call back pay. The three hours minimum, whether or not
actually worked, shall be paid at the rate of one and one half times the regular hourly
rate. Employees who are called back a second time within a normal shift period are
considered to be working for the duration of that shift.
Standby Pay. Standby is time during which an employee is not required to be at the
work location or at the employee's residence but is required to be available for
immediate return to work. Standby assignments shall first be made on a voluntary basis.
A volunteer standby list shall be established by classification and job location. Standby
assignments shall be made from the list of employees who are competent and
experienced, in alphabetical order, on a rotating basis. In the event that no one
volunteers, the Districts shall assign standby by job classification and work location from
employees who are competent and experienced on a rotational basis. An employee
placed on standby shall be compensated at the rate of one hundred dollars per week,
and will receive Callback pay when they are actually called to work.
The total cost for providing Callback pay, assuming five instances of callback per month
at an average hourly rate of$25.00, is $6,750 annually. This amount is in addition to
the present overtime cost, since the majority of callback situations are resolved within
an hour. The total maximum cost to place one programmer on standby status is $100
per week for 52 weeks, or $5,000 annually. The total annual cost of implementing both
Callback and Standby pay for Programmers is $11,950. This amount is in addition to
the amount currently paid for overtime.
GH:ps
J�WPDOOFI1MtN.lE�FPC.NlG1FANR.8615TAFFAPf 9HVSRFNIR98.0]
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
JANUARY 24, 1996
AGENDA ITEM (11 )(b)(11 ): FAHR96-05 Consideration of
Resolution No. 96.14, amending
Resolution No. 95-105, rescinding
provisions granting a 1% salary
increase to all employees re retiree
medical health premium offset
program.
Summary
During the 1993-94 negotiations with the Districts' bargaining units, an agreement with the
Orange County Employees Retirement System was made to implement the retiree medical
health premium offset program. Since negotiations, provisions of the original program altered
circumstances to the extent that a revised understanding is in the best interests of the
employees and the Districts.
The Districts and a majority of represented employees have agreed to rescind provisions of their
respective MOUs granting a one-percent salary increase to all employees to offset the
employees' one-percent cost to fund the retiree health premium subsidy. A Side Letter of
Agreement has been entered into documenting that understanding.
Staff Recommendation
Amend Resolution 95-105 to rescind a one-percent salary increase to fund the Retiree Medical
Health Premium since sufficient funds are available from an already existing Additional Retiree
Benefit Account (ARBA), resulting in a cost avoidance of approximately $260,000.
FAHR Committee Recommendation to Executive Committee
The Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee recommends the Executive
Committee approve stafrs recommendation to amend Resolution 95-105 to rescind a one-
percent salary increase to fund the Retiree Medical Health Premium since sufficient funds are
available from an already existing Additional Retiree Benefit Account (AREA).
Executive Committee Recommendation to Joint Boards of Directors
The Executive Committee concurs with the recommendation of the FAHR Committee.
��waoocvs„ucea iu.res>>aii Wv
a
January 10, 1996 -STAFF REPO
REPORT
FAHR96-05: Consideration of Resolution No. 96-_, amending Resolution No.
95-105 to rescind provisions granting a one-percent salary
increase to all employees re retiree medical health premium
offset program.
BACKGROUND
In the course of 1993-94 negotiations with each of the Districts' bargaining units, an
understanding was reached to enter into an agreement with the Orange County
Employees Retirement System (OCERS) to implement the retiree medical health
premium offset program as established by the County of Orange. Agreement with
OCERS has been reached. However, since the 1993-94 negotiations, provisions of the
original program and other circumstances have altered to the extent that a revised
understanding is in the best interests of the employees and the Districts.
Under the program originally proposed by the County of Orange, and as discussed at
length at each of the bargaining tables, employees were to contribute one percent of
their salary into an Additional Retiree Benefit Account (ARBA) that was also to be
funded by"excess" monies in the OCERS Unallocated Fund Balance and an initial
contribution by the County equal to one percent of payroll. The County also agreed to a
one percent salary increase to offset the employees' cost.
As the program actually evolved, OCERS determined they would not manage ARBA
funds beyond those generated by the Unallocated Fund Balance excess. The one
percent employee contribution was therefore retained by the County in a special fund,
and is treated as taxable earnings. This results in a net loss to the employee not
contemplated in the original program.
The Districts' ARBA fund balance is currently in excess of$2 million, which is more than
adequate to fund the retiree health premium subsidy of$10 per month for every year of
service up to a maximum of$250 into the foreseeable future without the need for
additional funding. Because of this, it is not necessary for the Districts to establish a
special fund with the one percent employee contribution, nor to contribute an initial
amount equal to one percent of payroll, for our program to remain viable.
The Districts and a majority of represented employees have therefore agreed to rescind
provisions of their respective MOU's granting a one percent Salary increase
CSDOC • P 0.Box 8127 6 Fovnt4ln Valley,CA 92728-8127 0 (714)962-2411
Y FAHR 96-05
Page 2
January 10, 1996
to all employees to offset the employees' one percent cost to fund the retiree health
premium subsidy. A Side Letter of Agreement has been entered into to document that
understanding.
Cost Avoidance - $260,000 a year to the Districts.
RECOMMENDATION
It is therefore recommended that the following provisions of Resolution 95-105 be
amended as indicated.
1. Section 2. Upen the e ffe .t,ye date ef the a ....... ent w th the Orange
2. Section 47. The Districts have entered into an agreement with the Orange
County Employee Retirement System (OCERS) to implement the retiree
medical health premium offset program established by the County of
Orange wherein the cost of health premiums are offset by $10 per month
for every year of service up to a maximum of 25 years or $250 per month.
GH:ps:jt
J'��NIPBWl5.M
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
JANUARY 24, 1996
AGENDA ITEM (11)(b)(12): FAHR96.08: Consideration of motion
authorizing staff to report to
Southern California Association of
Governments (SCAG) the Sanitation Districts' position on the Finance Chapter of
SCAG's Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide.
Summary
The goal of SCAG's Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide is to raise the level of economic
performance of the region to a higher level,while ensuring that environmental needs are met and the
quality of life for the region Is enhanced. The Public Finance Chapter is not mandated. It was provided for
Information and advisory purposes; however,since the Regional Comprehensive Plan frequently provides
the basis for new legislative efforts and mandates,staff has been following this process and reviewing any
recommendations which could potentially impact the Districts'revenue base. SCAG has established a
February 1, 1996 deadline for comments or concerns. In its Finance Chapter,SCAG has included ten
'Principles and Options for Improving the system of Public Finance" Of particular concern to the Districts
is Principle No.6,which states: "Special Districts with Independent Means to Raise Revenues
Should Not Drain Property Taxes from Cities and Counties Unless the Transfer Serves Appropriate
Government Policy Objectives."
The report goes on to state that"Special district property taxes have often been used to support voter
approved debt. To the extent that values depend on the viability of the district owned and operated
infrastructure,their use of property taxes is a reasonable revenue source and provision must be made to
ensure security for the repayment of this debt.'
Currently,the Districts receive$31,162,000 a year in property taxes representing 6.7%of its total funding
sources including reserves. Property taxes have been primarily used for COP debt service. Debt service
on the COPS is approximately$34.6 million. If property tax were not available for this purpose,user fees
would need to be increased by an average of$34.32 or 48%. Average user fees are currently$71.31.
There would be no change in user fees in Districts 13 and 14 since they were formed subsequent to the
passage of Proposition 13 and do not receive property taxes.
Staff Recommendation
Given the importance to the Districts of retaining property tax to service debt and maintaining user fees at
a reasonable level,the Districts should send formal comments to SCAG. Comments should emphasize
the importance of wastewater treatment to the environment and public health, and that the use of property
taxes to retire debt on priority infrastructure is a reasonable and appropriate use of these funds and
contributes to enhanced property values.
FAHR Committee Recommendation to Executive Committee
The Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee recommends the Executive Committee
approve staffs recommendation as stated above.
Executive Committee Recommendation to the Joint Boards of Directors
The Executive Committee concurs with the recommendation of staff and the FAHR Committee.
�awaooaa,ucaauuasnauww
FAHR96-08
Page 3
January 10, 1996
Conclusion
Given the current economic and political climate, it should come as no surprise that special
districts are under scrutiny. It is important that sufficient information is provided to the policy
makers at the local and state level so that they can understand the mission of this agency. The
importance which effective wastewater treatment plays in maintaining the environment and
public health must be underscored. The infrastructure financed through Certificates of
Participation is certainly needed for economic growth and for the protection and enhancement
of property values. These points need to be made in formal comments to SCAG on the RCPG.
On the other hand, not every existing special district in Southern California deserves to exist
without change. There are many examples of special districts which are very local, duplicative,
and offer little in the way of regional problem solving. CSDOC should avoid finding itself in the
untenable position of defending all special districts. The message needs to be one of careful
study, consolidation where appropriate, and support for those districts which are providing
important regional service. Not all special districts should be treated exactly the same. There
are significant differences among special districts. CSDOC should work to distinguish its role
and mission as an agency with a critical regional function, which needs to have a predictable
and reasonable financial foundation.
Recommendation
The District should send formal comments to SCAG on the Public Finance Chapter of the
Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide, emphasizing the importance of wastewater treatment
to the environment and public health and supporting the use of property taxes to retire debt on
priority infrastructure as a reasonable and appropriate use of these funds.
JAW:cmc
J:\WPDOC\FIN\CRANE\FPC.NRGTANR. 6 TAFFRPT.%ISRFANRWW
Attachment No. 1
January 10, 1995
Principles and Options
for
Improving the system of Public Finance
1) Different Local Finance Models Can Be Followed in Different Parts of the Slate.
2) Any Reallocation of Sources of Revenues Must Insure that the State, at the Time of
Implementation, Does not Collect more Total Tax Revenue Under the New system that it
Did Previously, Although the Burden may Be Shifted Among Groups of Taxpayers.
3) Flexible Fiscal Management is Needed at the Scale of the Subregion and the Region.
4) Revenue Incentives Need to be Restructured to Maximize the Attraction and
Maintenance of Quality Jobs in the Region.
5) To the Extent that the State Continues to Mandate Functions on the Localities the State
Must Raise and Provide the Necessary Revenues to Local Authorities. Local
Governments May, at Their Option, Contract with the State to Provide the Services So
Mandated.
6) Special Districts With Independent Means To Raise Revenues Should Not Drain
Property Taxes from Cities and Counties Unless The Transfer Serves Appropriate
Governmental Policy Objectives.
7) Incentives Should Be Created or Disincentives Removed to Encourage Subregional or
Regional Service Delivery Where it is Demonstrably Less Expensive, More Efficient and
Improves the Business Climate.
8) Dedicated Sources of Revenues for Local Services Should Be Created.
9) The System Adopted Should Be Understandable and Reinforce the Capacity for Public
Accountability.
10) Market Pricing Should Be A Preferred Approach to Financing Government Services and
Allocating Service Levels.
JAW:cmc
J9W PDOCTIN\CRANEWPC.MTGFAHR.96%STAFFRPT.SMTFAHR96.07
ATTACHMENT No. 2
1/3/96
User Fee Increases Needed for COP Service
To Replace Property Taxes
1995-96 Budgeted COP Service No. Of Taxes For 1995-96 Potential Tax Lose
Budgeted COP(Debt) Made From Equivalent COP Sew Single Fam Revised %Change
Prop Taxes .Service 'Pmn Taxes Dwelling Units Per EDU User Fee SFR Fee In Fep
1 $ 2,105,000 $ 4.289,000 $ 2,105,000 73.847 $ 28.50 $ 83.24 $ 111.74 34.24%
2 9,615,000 11.392.000 9,515,000 274.504 34.66 71.62 106.18 48.47%
3 10,615,000 10.694,000 10,616.000 285,750 37.15 73.89 111.04 50.27%
5 2,415,000 2,013,000 2,013,000 27,590 72.96 96.75 169.71 75.41%
6 1,225,000 1,468,000 1,225,000 43.682 28.04 76.47 104.51 36.67%
7 3,230,000 2,401,000 2,401,000 106,000 22.65 50.09 72.74 45.22%
11 2,041,000 2,160,000 2,041,000 52,000 39.25 60.00 99.25 65.42%
13 27,000 8,175 100.00 100.00 0.00%
Total $ 31,146,000 $ 34,444,000 $ 29,915,000 871,548 $ 34.32 $ 71.31 $ 105.63 48.13%
COP TAXI.XLS 9:19 AM
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
1 JANUARY 24, 1996
Agenda Item (12): FAHR96-06 Consideration of motion to receive
and file staff report dated January 10, 1996 re
Benchmarking and Performance Measurement
Update.
Sum ma
The Districts will use benchmarking practices as a systemic approach to optimizing
operating efficiencies, identifying areas for short and long-term cost containment,
assuring environmental compliance, and as a tool for strategic planning. Recently, the
departments have undertaken significant actions to develop benchmarking and
performance measurement strategies. Activity Trends, as reflected in the FY 1995-96
Budget, are a first step in the development of our benchmarking and performance
measurement programs. Other projects are underway, including tracking performance
externally against other wastewater agencies, increased utilization of automation,
development of more comprehensive benchmark and performance standards, and an
evaluation of privatization.
As we progress with these programs, critical performance indicators will ultimately be
devised at the unit/process level, and will allow us to provide comprehensive operational
data that measure unit cost, efficiency and effectiveness.
Staff Recommendation
Information item only.
FAHR Committee Recommendation to Executive Committee
This item is being submitted as an information only item with the recommendation that it
be received and filed.
J\WPCIXTBSMGBW�NCgtI WPO
January 10, 1996
STAFF REPORT
FAHR96-06: Benchmarking and Performance Measurement Update
Background
Benchmarking and performance measurement have always been conducted to some
degree at the Districts since inception; however, the formal incorporation of these
processes into our organizational culture, and the inclusion of a performance-based
philosophy into day-to-day operations, has not occurred until recently. The
organizational restructuring beginning in FY 1994-95, and the Performance
Measurements Assessment Report completed mid-year by Ernst &Young, resulted in
significant revision to the Districts' Budget document. Beginning in fiscal year 1995-96,
Activity Trends and Performance Measures were included in the adopted annual budget
documentation in an effort to identify levels of service provided, productivity, and the
funding necessary to achieve service delivery objectives. The FY 1995-96 Budget
represented an important first step in developing our benchmarking and performance
measurement programs.
I. ACTIONS UNDERWAY
Projects are currently underway to further develop our benchmarking and performance
measurement programs and to provide the most cost-effective services while
maintaining our commitment to excellence in wastewater and environmental
management.
Quarterly Reporting
Quarterly reporting of current division-level Activity Trends, and a comparison of
actuals versus estimated annual performance (as reflected in the FY 95-96
Budget) has begun'. This information provides managers and policy-makers an
overview of operations and performance trends, and ultimately translates into the
'cost of doing business" as reflected in the department cost allocation graphic
shown in the attached Exhibit 1. It should be noted that the first quarter cost per
million gallons treated is 19% below FY 95/96 projections and 15% below the
revised annual target of$599 per million gallons treated.
'First Quarter Report is provided under separate cover.
CSDOC r P O. B.v 8127 n Fnumain VA9ey.CA 92228-8127 0 Tol. (214)962-2411 0 FAX(714)962-9954
Y
FAHR96-06
Page 2
January 10, 1996
Cooperative Study with EBMUD & Sacramento Regional
Tracking performance externally against other wastewater agencies and the
benchmark "industry best practice," will be critical to establishing meaningful
metrics. The benchmarking process at the Districts will coincide with a
cooperative study between three facilities: CSDOC, Sacramento Regional
County Sanitation District (Sacramento Regional) and East Bay Municipal Utilities
District (EBMUD). This joint agency benchmarking study has been through the
RFP approval process and will commence early next fiscal year. The project will
provide unit-specific operating costs and operation and maintenance
performance measures, and will compare these three wastewater treatment
organizations on a cost-per-million-gallons basis. This study will be an extension
of the EBMUD Benchmarking Study completed in April 1995 which was used to
compare unit costs for chemicals, labor, and energy for five treatment processes
at seven participating facilities, including the Districts.
Performance Measurement/Benchmarking
The Operations Department has begun to integrate performance expectations
into their work plan and is an example of a department using benchmarking
practices as a systemic approach to optimizing plant operating efficiencies,
identifying areas for short and long-term cost reduction, assuring full compliance
with environmental regulations, and as a tool for strategic planning. A critical
component of benchmarking will be implementing a concise set of performance
measurements at the division level, unit process level, and ultimately the task
level. Measuring, evaluating and managing Operations' performance to meet or
exceed optimal efficiency targets will be a critical goal in the forthcoming fiscal
year.
Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS)
Maintenance staff have been consistently working toward completion of the
Computerized Maintenance Management System database and are
approximately 80% complete with the inventory input. This automated system
will provide more thorough performance-based information thereby allowing us to
examine in further detail those factors that impact the delivery of plant and
infrastructure maintenance services.
Financial Information System
Operational and financial information (i.e., flows, budget vs actual, division
contribution to cost, etc.), that provide a framework for performance
measurement are available in a number of separate reports currently generated
FAHR96-06
Page 3
January 10, 1996
within the Districts; however, organization of this data into useful information
requires manual manipulation, calculation, and report generation. An integrated
Financial Information System (FIS) will be the backbone of technology needed to
support more timely information retrieval and automatic generation of progress
reports. Currently proposals are being sought for a vendor to implement the FIS
over the next twelve months.
Privatized Service Delivery
Ultimately, benchmarks and performance must be measured against agencies
performing similar responsibilities in the private sector. Privatization of various
services represents a viable alternative (as reflected in our recent contracting of
Security) and potentially provides additional opportunities to improve the cost-
effectiveness of operations. The Director of Operations, Bob Dolan, recently
traveled to the Indianapolis wastewater treatment plants and the AMSA
Conference on Privatization. He has prepared a report on this trip which
highlighted the importance of technology, scheduling, cross-training, preventive
and predictive maintenance, performance monitoring and communications.
These visits provided an important framework to further understand contract
services as recipient and provider.
It. FUTURE WORK PROGRAMS
Although significant strides have been made in developing benchmarking and
performance measurement strategies, the complexity and scope of such programs
require an on-going and multi-year commitment. The following items are examples of
approaches that will be utilized over the course of the next twelve to eighteen months to
further identify means to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the Districts'
operations.
Refinement of Activity Trends
Additional refinement of the existing budgetary Activity Trends is needed. As
more comprehensive operational information is requested and gathered, it is
becoming increasingly apparent that more appropriate performance
measurements are available. Exhibit 2 is an example of various indicators for
measuring performance, identifying costs, etc., particularly for activities
encompassing wastewater maintenance and operations tasks. Although we
have currently incorporated several of these indices in the present budget, many
have not been included. For the FY 1996-97 Budget, indicators such as those
reflected in the attached exhibit will be used to provide better and more
comprehensive information. Furthermore, "administrative" indices of similar
FAHR96-06
Page 4
January 10, 1996
scope will be developed for departments such as Human Resources,
Engineering, Communications and Information Technology. It is intended that for
FY 96-97, three to five refined Activity Trends will be included in each division's
budget documentation.
Team Building
An important component in the re-engineering or're-inventing' of an organization
or process is employee participation and buy-in. Without such support,
implementation of benchmarks and performance-based programs becomes
difficult, thus risking opportunities for the greatest success. A number of division
level employee-based committees will assist with the creation of performance
measures and appropriate benchmarks. Currently, the Operations Department
has assembled a Cost Reduction Team to identify processes which can be
improved for operational efficiency and effectiveness. These committees,
meeting periodically with the administrative and financial analysts and/or
department heads, will be an important resource, and will help ensure the timely
integration of performance standards and benchmarks into day-to-day Districts
operations.
Efficiency. Effectiveness & Cost Reduction Studies
As shown in Exhibit 3, there have been significant expenditure increases in
Personnel, Maintenance and Other categories within the Joint Operating budget
over the last ten years. Annual percentage changes have averaged +5.6%
adjusted for the CPI. One component of this increase is the 70% growth in staff
since Fiscal Year 1985/86.
The data portrayed in the exhibit raise potential issues and concerns relative to
the growth of the Districts. As such, the information will be used to help identify
and prioritize programmatic areas for thorough unit/cost studies. Comprehensive
operational analysis at the division and/or unit level (dependent upon scope) will
be performed by in-house staff to understand the underlying factors contributing
to growth, develop appropriate performance measures and benchmarks, as well
as to determine means to improve efficiency and effectiveness. It is expected
that one such study will be completed per quarter, with implementation of agreed
upon recommendations occurring within the following twelve month period. The
sequence of division/department studies has yet to be determined; however,
those divisions with adequate existing information for thorough analysis and with
comparatively large budgetary increases will be the initial focus of effort.
FAHR96-06
Page 5
January 10, 1996
Miscellaneous
In addition to the previous items, other performance enhancement and
benchmarking opportunities will be pursued as time is available. In brief, special
projects will be periodically undertaken organization-wide in an effort to improve
the efficiency and effectiveness of operations while simultaneously accomplishing
our primary mission.
Financial Impact
It is difficult to estimate the financial impact of this long-term program as it is in the initial
stages of development. Nevertheless, various organization development specialists
indicate that implementation of comprehensive performance-based programs,
benchmarking and productivity improvements can result in a cost savings of 6%-11% of
the operational budget. Based on Fiscal Year 1995/96, such savings would equate to
$3.49-$6.40 million annually.
Staff Recommendation
This is an information item only.
GRM/LA -gm
JAWP�MCRANEIFPCMrGTMR.98l5WMM.B RFMRWM
EXHIBIT 1
Department Contributions to Gallonage Charge
(First Quarter FY 95/96)
Districts Net Joint
Operating Expenses
*$509/mg
Operations
Human Information Technical
Management Finance $155lmg__ Maintenance Engineering
$20/mg Resources $41/mg Technology Solids Disposal $147/mg Services $12/mg
$131mg $20/mg $83/mg $81/mg
`Adjusted for$43/mg Revenues
IANGM:dk CSDOC
p:1nomebpsecVee1vrW8hr2 95.ppt Revision 77127195
Exhibit 2
Inputs:
Total cost of operations To allow comparison of costs to other departments and
Cost per capita of wastewater treated other wastewater entities
Number and treatment capacity of plants and level of To provide a picture of the size of operations for which the
treatment provided by each entity is responsible
Miles of infrastructure (pipeline)
Number of employee hours or Full-time Equivalents (FTE) To indicate time spent on providing the service
Ou(puts:
Miles of sewer pipe maintained, repaired and inspected To indicate amount of infrastructure maintained, repaired,
(by geographic area) and inspected
Percentage of miles maintained requiring repair
Percentage of above repaired this year
Miles of new sewer constructed To indicate the increase in the infrastructure to meet the
Square footage of facilities constructed/acreage improved needs of industry and the community in general
Number of service calls completed (by District) To indicate the level of work performed on existing system
Number/types of maintenance work orders performed beyond general maintenance
Amount of wastewater treated (by treatment type): To indicate the flow through the system and the relative
Primary treatment volumes requiring various treatments
Secondary treatment
Dry tons of sludge produced To indicate the volume of dry sludge produced
Indicator Rationale for Selecting Indicator
Outcomes:
Number of main stoppages per 100 miles of sewer main To determine how well the infrastructure is maintained
(by District)
Average service response time (in hours)
Number of complaints (by District) To indicate the quality of service, particularly from the
customer's perspective
Number of days effluent exceeded federal and/or state
standards--number of violations of discharge permit
(include reasons for noncompliance)
Number of days influent exceeded treatment plant To indicate the ability of treatment process to remove
capacity pollution adequately
Number of gallons effluent that did not meet federal
standards/total number of gallons processed through
system
Quality of water in receiving body downstream from
discharge
Infiltration and inflow ratio To indicate the condition of the infrastructure and the
effectiveness of the maintenance program
Efficienc r.
Percentage of repairs and Preventive Maintenance To indicate ability of the service group to clear calls within
completed within goal time goal time
Percentage of line staff hours applied to actual To indicate the productivity and cost-effectiveness of
maintenance tasks/plant operations personnel
Efficiency(cont):
Wastewater treatment cost per MGD treated (by treatment
type): To indicate the cost of providing the service and for
Primary treatment comparison with other wastewater entities
Secondary treatment
Sludge disposal or use cost/dry ton
Revenue from sales of by-products less costs
WfanatoM
Description of what the receiving body is used for To provide information on the system's impact on the
environment
Population served To allow the reader to understand the size and
Square miles served demographics of the system
Average daily flow/maximum daily treatment capacity (by To indicate the extent of excess capacity
treatment plant)
Debt service coverage ratio To show ability to pay debt
Projected needed capacity in 5 years/current capacity To indicate the need for future expansion and funding
Total revenues from customer billings/total operating costs To determine how much subsidization, if any, is occurring
and debt service
GM:jt
CIG THE MFMENERFORIAFPNNIFMR"B 1 2
10 Year Increases Exhibit 3
Data below reflect 10-year history of operating costs and the percentage(%)change in Personnel, Utilities, Maintenance 8 Other Costs(Research,
Contracts,Supplies,etc.). Percentage changes have also been adjusted for the Consumer Price Index factor in the given Fiscal Year. Data are also
presented for cost per million gallons(MG)based on average annual gallons treated.
Dollars in Thousands-Joint Operating
EY Personnel %Change Utilities %Chanoe Maint/Oth %Change 5UM % C_hanoe ACPI $1MG' AChia SING MGD Treated
FY 85/86 $10,238 - $ 4.766 - $ 8.698 - $ 23.702 - - $269 - 241
FY 86/87 $11,426 11.6% $ 5.002 5.0% $ 11.177 28.5% $ 27,605 16.5% 3.0% 13.5% $304 12.7% 249
FY 87/88 $ 13,279 16.2% $ 4,539 -9.3% $ 14,069 25.9% $ 31,887 15.5% 4.3% 11.2% $339 11.5% 258
FY 88189 $ 13,945 5.0% $ 5.025 10.7% $ 17,607 25.1% $ 36,577 14.7% 4.8% 9.9% $380 12.1% 264
FY 89/90 $ 16.334 17.1% $ 5,036 0.2% $ 18,349 4.2% $ 39,719 8.6% 5.2% 3.4% $406 7.0% 268
FY 90/91 $20.796 27.3% $ 5,018 -0.4% $ 18,835 2.6% S 44,649 12.4% 5.2% 7.2% S455 12.0% 269
FY 91/92 $22.352 7.5% $ 5,424 8.1% $ 19,802 5.1% $47,578 6.6% 3.5% 3.1% $574 26.3% 227
FY 92193 $24,660 10.3% $ 6,740 24.3% $ 18,921 4.4% S50,321 5.8% 3.1% 2.7% $594 3.6% 232
FY 93/94 $24.715 0.2% $ 4,042 40.0% $ 18,870 -0.3% $47,627 -5.4% 1.5% •6.9% $565 4.9% 231
FY 94/95 $25,861 4.6% $ 2,630 -34.9% $22,791 20.8% $ 51,282 7.7% 1.6% 6.1% $578 2.4% 243
10 yr AVE. 11.1% 4.0% 12.0% 9.1% 3.5%1 5.67.
'These numbers have not Oven adjusted tor Joint censors revenues.
Data below show the change in actual Full-time(FT)staffing levels and attendant percentage growth/decline in personnel
as of June 30th of the Fiscal Year.
Personnel Changes
EY FT Act °YvChange
FY 85/86 335 -
FY 86/87 353 5.4%
FY 87188 382 8.2%
FY 88189 418 9.4%
FY 89/90 487 16.5%
FY 90/91 542 11.3%
FY 91192 579 6.8%
FY 92193 581 0.3%
FY 93194 587 1.0%
FY 94195 572 .2.6%
10 yr AVE. 6.3%
10YRCOST.XLS
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION BY THE ORANGE COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS REQUESTING THE LOCAL AGENCY
FORMATION COMMISSION TO TAKE PROCEEDINGS FOR THE
FORMATION OF A COUNTY-WIDE SANITATION DISTRICT
. . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .
WHEREAS, the County of Orange is engaged in negotiations with the existing County
Sanitation District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California
("DISTRICTS") for the possible purchase, sale and transfer of County's integrated waste
management system and facilities, and
WHEREAS, DISTRICTS provide a sewerage collection, treatment and disposal system
for the residents within twenty-three (23) of the thirty-one (31) incorporated cities and a portion
of the unincorporated areas within the county but do not own, operate or control any refuse
transfer or disposal system although authorized to do so under the provisions of the County
Sanitation District Act(California Health and Safety Code §4740 at seq.). and
WHEREAS, it is necessary and desirable to create a new county-wide sanitation district
to acquire, operate and maintain a county-wide refuse transfer and disposal integrated waste
management system in the event agreement is reached for the sale and transfer between the
County and DISTRICTS: and
WHEREAS, the County of Orange therefore desires to initiate proceedings pursuant to
the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, commencing with §56000 of
the California Government Code, for the formation of a county sanitation district pursuant to
California Health and Safety Code §4700 et seq.; and
WHEREAS, notice of intent to adopt this resolution of application has not been given to
each interested and each subject agency; and
WHEREAS, the district proposed to be formed is inhabited and its boundaries are co-
terminus with the territorial boundaries of the County of Orange; and
WHEREAS, it is described to provide that the proposed formation be subject to the
following terms and conditions:
1. The powers of the district shall include the authority, as set forth in the County
Sanitation District Act (California Health & Safety Code §4741).
2. The governing board shall consist of the presiding officer, or alternate, of every
city in the county, save and except any city the sewered portion of which lies
entirely within a sanitary district; the Ciarman or alternate, of the Omge County
Board of Supervisors; and a member of each sanitary district in the county, as
provided for in California Health and Safety Code §4730.
3. The newly formed sanitation district shall enter into an agreement with the
existing County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 for the
maintenance of a certralized and joint administrative organization to care for the
general administration of the affairs of each of the districts and the construction,
supervision, operation and maintenance of the work of each of the district, as
provided for in California Health and Safety Code §4840 et seq.
4. The district shall pay, or cause to be paid, to the County, an amount, and on
such terms as are yet to be agreed upon, for the acquisition and transfer of
County's active and inactive landfills and other real and personal property
utilized by the County in operating its integrated waste management system.
5. The district shall employ those County employees (deemed necessary) by the
district for an orderly transition of integrated waste management operations on
such terms and conditions as are consistent with the terms and conditions of
employment of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County.
6. Such other terms and conditions as deemed appropriate by the Local Agency
Formation Commission, the County of Orange, and the County Sanitation
Districts of Orange County.
WHEREAS, a plan for providing services shall be submitted as required by Government
Code §56653; and
WHEREAS, the reason for the proposed formation is to facilitate a county-wide landfill
and refuse disposal system.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS DOES HEREBY RESOLVE:
Section 1: This resolution of application is hereby adopted and approved by the
Orange County Board of Supervisors and the Local Agency Formation Commission of Orange
County is hereby requeted to take proceedings for the formation of a county-wide sanitation
district according to the terms and conditions stated above and in the manner provided by the
Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985.
Section 2: This Board finds and determines that the inclusion within the new district
of the jurisdictional area of all existing sanitary districts and Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5,
6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 is in the public interest and the territory within those districts will benefit
thereby.
Section 3: All notices and reports, as specified in Government Code §56652 shall be
mailed to:
(a) Roger Stanton
Chairman of the Board of Supervisors
Hall of Administration
10 Civic Center Plaza
Santa Ana, California 92702
(b) John C. Cox
Chairman of the Joint Boards of the County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
P. O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held , 1996.
J5WPD0C1BSRES'RESM ❑PV.RES
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
JANUARY 24, 1996
Agenda Item (13): Update re proposed acquisition of County of
Orange Integrated Waste Management System.
(a) Consideration of Resolution No. 96-15, directing that the Orange County Board
of Supervisors be requested to file a Resolution of Application with the Orange
County Local Agency Formation Commission initiating proceedings relative to
proposed formation of County Sanitation District No. 99 for acquisition,
maintenance, and operation of a landfill and refuse disposal system.
Summary
In preparation for(and anticipation of) the acquisition of the County's Solid Waste
Management System by a new sanitation district, work is now underway for the
preparation of a LAFCO application. Because the formation of a new County Sanitation
District must be initiated by the County Board of Supervisors, it is logical that the
LAFCO application also be initiated by the Board of Supervisors.
The Ad Hoc Committee re Landfill Issues has recommended that the LAFCO
application be submitted as soon as practical to move it along in parallel with the landfill
due diligence and acquisition process and that the Board of Supervisors be requested
to do so. Sanitation Districts' staff and consultants will be providing most of the
materials necessary for the application.
Before the application is actually finalized and submitted to LAFCO sometime in March,
the Directors will be asked to review and approve the application. The application can
be subsequently withdrawn by the sponsor for any reason. Therefore if the County and
the Sanitation Districts cannot reach an agreement on the terms of the acquisition, then
the application filed with LAFCO can be withdrawn.
Staff Recommendation
Consideration of Resolution No. 96-15, directing that the Orange County Board of
Supervisors be requested to file a Resolution of Application with the Orange County
Local Agency Formation Commission initiating proceedings relative to proposed
formation of County Sanitation District No. 99 for acquisition, maintenance, and
operation of a landfill and refuse disposal system.
ewvmc�awnweuumnuww
RESOLUTION NO. 96-15
�4 DIRECTING THAT THE ORANGE COUNTY BOARD
OF SUPERVISORS BE REQUESTED TO FILE A
RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION WITH THE ORANGE
COUNTY LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
INITIATING PROCEEDINGS RELATIVE TO PROPOSED
FORMATION OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
NO. 99 FOR ACQUISITION, MAINTENANCE, AND
OPERATION OF A LANDFILL AND REFUSE DISPOSAL
SYSTEM
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA DIRECTING THAT THE ORANGE COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS BE REQUESTED TO FILE A RESOLUTION
OF APPLICATION WITH THE ORANGE COUNTY LOCAL AGENCY
FORMATION COMMISSION INITIATING REVIEW PROCEEDINGS
RELATIVE TO PROPOSED FORMATION OF COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICT NO. 99 FOR ACQUISITION, MAINTENANCE, AND OPERATION
OF A LANDFILL AND REFUSE DISPOSAL SYSTEM
WHEREAS, the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California and the
County of Orange have entered into negotiations for the purchase, sale and transfer of County
landfill operations; and,
WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange
County, California have considered the feasibility of a new county-wide Sanitation District,
which would be empowered to acquire, operate and maintain a county-wide, locally controlled
refuse disposal system, and,
WHEREAS, Califomia health and Safety Code Section 4710 provides, in pertinent part,
that formation of a County Sanitation District shall be initiated pursuant to resolution of the
Board of Supervisors of Orange County, California, and,
WHEREAS, California Government Code Sections 56000 et seq. provide, in pertinent
part, that the Orange County Local Agency Formation Commission ("LAFCO") shall have the
opportunity to review and approve or disapprove the proposed formation of a special district
prior to LAFCO's initiation of further proceedings necessary to accomplish the formation of said
special district.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos, 1, 2, 3,
\Y 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1: That these Districts hereby request, pursuant to Health and Safety Code
Section 4710, that the Orange County Board of Supervisors file a resolution of application with
LAFCO initiating proceedings for the formation of County Sanitation District No. 99.
Section 2: That these Districts each hereby consent to the inclusion of their
respective Districts within the district to be formed, and request approval of the proposed
formation of County Sanitation District No. 99 by LAFCO.
Section 3: That the General Manager, General Counsel, and their designees of the
County Sanitation Districts are hereby authorized and directed to assist and cooperate with the
County and LAFCO in the formation of County Sanitation District No. 99 as soon as possible,
and to take all further necessary appropriate actions to obtain the approval of LAFCO and the
formation of county Sanitation District No. 99.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held , 1996.
J:\W PDOMBS2 ESRES96\9 15
v
COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS. 1 , 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 , 13 AND 14
OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
MINUTES
JOINT BOARD MEETING
DECEMBER 13, 1995
RICTS 0FO9gy
G
� Z
� a
wvv
HE
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018
ROLL CALL .
A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Diameter Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
q 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California,was held on December 13, 1995. at 7:30 p.m., in Me
Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called
and Me Secretary reported a quorum present for nsWcts Nos. 1, 2,3, 5, 6, 7, 11,and 13 as
follows:
ACTWE ALTERNATE
DIRECTORS DIRECTORS
DISTRICT NO. 1: y Pot McGuigan, Choir _ Ted R.Moreno
y James M.Ferryman,Clair pro tam _ Amer Perry
, Mark A.Murphy _ Jeanne Coonn
. Themes R.Sehmelll Jim Potts
Ropes Santa. y William G.Steiner
DISTRICT NO.2: A John Collins, Chair George Soon
Daniel T.Welch, Chair pro tam y John M.Gullikson
y Bern Caress Bob Ben
y Ikew.DUNep Glen Parker
y Norman Z.Eckenrode Carol Downey
y James H.Flora Steve Anderson
y Pat MCGupan Ted R.Moreno
* Mark A.Murphy Jaame Coona
* Julie So Chris Navy,
y Sheldon Singer _ George L.Zlaket
Roger Stanton y WAam G.Steiner
y Bob Zemel _ Tom Daly
DISTRICT NO.3: g Sol A. Saturn, Chair Henry M.Dotson
y Burnie Dunlap, Clair pro tem _ Glenn Parker
Walter Bowman Gail Reny
y George Brown _ W,.I,n Bruce Hastings
John Collins George Scott
y James H.Flora _ Steve Anderson
y Don R.Griffin Patsy Marshall
y Vicar L er, _ Ralph Bauer
A Wally lion Eva G.Miner
y Pat McGuigan _ Ted R.Moreno
_L Margie L.Rice Grace Epperson
y Julie 58 _ Chnis Nomy
y Sheldon Simper _ George L.21alat
Roger Sermon y William G.Steiner
y Charles Sylvia _ Roam Walbmmin
y Bob Zonal — Tom Daly
DISTRICT NO.5: Z Jan Cabay,Clair _ John C.Cox.Jr.
y Wigton G.Steiner,Choir We tam _ Roper Stanton
1 John C.Coa.Jr. _ Jan Cabs,
DISTRICT N0. 6: James M.Far ,n m,Choir Amlur Perry
3_ An Coal Clair pro tem Jon C.Cos.Jr.
y Wiliam G.Steiner _ Roper Stanton
DISTRICT NO.7: re Barry humarent.Chair Mike Ward
1 Thomas R.Saltarelli Jim Pons
y Jan Depair _ John C.Cox,Jr.
y James M.Ferrymm.Chair We tern _ Anhui Perry
y Pat McGuigan _ Ted R. Moreno
1 Mark A.Murphy _ Joanna Coontr
y Wlliam G.Steiner _ Roger Santa.
DISTRICT NO.11: y Victor Loping. Choir _ Rolpn Bauer
y Shirley Dartlofl,Chair pro tom _ Ralph Sauer
Roger Shown y William G.Steiner
DISTRICT NO. 13: y John W GNluson.Chaff _ Carol T.WOO
v Bob Zonal.Chair We tom _ Tam Daly
y Mark A.Murphy _ Joanne Coona
Glenn Parker y Burnie Dunlap
y Wiliam G.Steiner _ Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO. 14: �_ Thomas R.Salomon.Chair _ Jim Ports
Mark A.Murphy. Chair pro tem _ Joanne Coona
y Barry Hemmo d _ Mike Want
y William G.Steiner _ Roger Stanton
y Pom A.Swan _ Darryl Miller
.2.
12/13/95
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Don McIntyre, General Manager, Blake P. Anderson,
Assistant General Manager-Operations, Judith A.
Wilson, Assistant General Manager-Administration,
Penny Kyle, Board Secretary, John Finias, Janet Gray,
Gary Hasenstab, Ed Hodges, Steve Hovey, Patricia
Jonk, Terri Josway, Steve Kozak, David Ludwin, Mike
Moore, Bob Ooten, Mike Peterman, Gary Streed,
Michelle Tuchman, Nancy Wheatley, Mike White
OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Mary Lee, Kris
Lindstrom, Jon Schotz, Nancy Whitehead, George
Zlaket, Alternate Director
DISTRICT 14
Adjournment of meeting due to lack
of quorum
This 13th day of December, 1995, at 7:30 p.m., being the time and place for the
Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 of
Orange County, California, and there not being a quorum present in District No. 14,
the meeting of said District was thereupon adjourned by the Secretary.
DISTRICT 3
Receive and file minute excerpt re Board
appointments
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the minute excerpt from the City of Cypress re election of mayor and
appointment of alternate be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed, as follows:
('Mayor)
Active Director Alternate Director
Walter K. Bowman` Gail Kerry
DISTRICT 7
Appointment of Chair pro tem
In the absence of Chair Barry Hammond and Chair pro tem Thomas R. Saltarelli,
Director James M. Ferryman was appointed Chair pro tem of District No. 7.
-3-
4
12/13/95
DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 13
Report of the Joint Chair
The Joint Chair reported that the CASA Annual Work Conference is scheduled for
January 18 to January 20, 1996, in Palm Springs. He encouraged all of the
Executive Committee members to attend.
He then mentioned that there may be a need to call for a Special Joint Board
Meeting in February to discuss the landfill acquisition. Also, an additional Special
Joint Board Meeting may be necessary regarding the bankruptcy situation. Staff
will advise the Directors if these meetings are finalized.
The Joint Chair then reported that a Directors' Workshop is scheduled for
January 27th, from 9:00 a.m. to noon. These quarterly workshops will provide
Directors with information on the new strategic planning program. He stated it was
critical for the Directors to attend the workshops to have a thorough understanding
of the strategic plan.
Joint Chair Cox then recognized the Districts' Controller, Mike White, and presented
him with a Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting from the
Government Finance Office Association of the United States and Canada.
Ed Hodges, Director of Maintenance, was also recognized and presented with the
1995 Collection System of the Year Award from the Santa Ana River Basin Section
of the California Water Environmental Association. The award focuses on large
systems with 500+ miles of sewage lines, regulatory compliance, training programs,
safety programs with corrective maintenance programs, encouragement of
professional activities, and data management.
The following tentatively scheduled upcoming meetings were then announced, as
follows:
Operations, Maintenance, and Technical Services Committee -Wednesday,
January 3, at 5:30 p.m.
Planning, Design, and Construction Committee -Thursday, January 4, at
5:30 p.m.
Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee-Wednesday,
January 10, at 5:30 p.m.
Executive Committee-Wednesday, January 17, at 5:30 p.m.
-4-
a
12/13/95
DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 13
Report of the General Manager
The General Manager reported that recently Bob Dolan, Director of Operations,
went to Indianapolis to tour and study the only large wastewater agency under
private operation. He then went to Washington, DC to attend a meeting regarding
privatization. Mr. Ooten will be preparing a white paper on his findings, which will
be incorporated with the report to the Directors regarding benchmarking and how
his findings might be implemented in the benchmarking efforts.
DISTRICT 1
Approval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting
held November 15, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed
approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 2
Approval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting
held November 15, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed
approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 3
Approval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting
held November 15, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed
approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 5
Approval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting
held November 15, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed
approved, as mailed.
-5-
Y
12/13/95
DISTRICT 6
AAooroval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting
held November 15, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed
approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 7
Approval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting
held November 15, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed
approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 11
Aooroval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting
held November 15, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed
approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 13
Aooroval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meetings
held October 25, 1995, and November 15, 1995, the Chair ordered that said
minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 13
Ratification of payment of Joint and
Individual District Claims
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That payment of Joint and Individual District claims set forth on exhibits "A" and "B"
attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and
are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated.
-6-
12/13/95
11/15/95 11/29/95
ALL DISTRICTS
Joint Operating Fund - $ 658,139.29 $ 913,082.79
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 918,505.92 569,880.05
Joint Working Capital Fund - 306,045.29 225,570.47
Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 19,724.59 28,159.68
DISTRICT NO. 1 - 1,577.07 0.00
DISTRICT NO. 2 - 52,424.68 2,055.76
DISTRICT NO. 3 - 452,167.22 76,548.21
DISTRICT NO. 5 - 1,506.29 689.25
DISTRICT NO. 6 - 931.08 0.00
DISTRICT NO. 7 - 560,342.90 20.723.34
DISTRICT NO. 11 - 204,124.24 9,593.96
DISTRICT NO. 13 - 11.90 0.00
DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 157,157.31 17.80
DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 0.00 211.12
DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 794.77 16.59
13,333,452.55 $1.846.549.02
DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7,11 & 13
Authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to
Dell Computer for the Purchase of 24 Personal
Computers and Monitors and Other
Associated Components (Specification E-263)
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue a purchase order to Dell Computer
for a total amount not to exceed $75,863.00, plus sales tax, for the Purchase of 24
Personal Computers and Monitors and Other Associated Components
(Specification No. E-263).
-7-
4
12/13/95
DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 13
Approving Professional Services Agreement with
K. P. Lindstrom for environmental, planning. and
technical services for assistance on development
of a Strategic Plan. CEQA comoliance. and various
permitting issues
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 95-117, approving
Professional Services Agreement with K. P. Lindstrom for environmental, planning,
and technical services for assistance on development of a Strategic Plan, CEQA
compliance, and various permitting issues for the period January 1, 1996 through
June 30, 1998, on an hourly-rate basis including labor, overhead, direct expenses,
and profit, for a total amount not to exceed $175,000.00. Said resolution, by
reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7. 11 & 13
Receive and file draft minutes of the Ad Hoc
Committee re Landfill Issues
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the draft minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re Landfill Issues meeting held on
November 15, 1995, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed.
DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7. 11 & 13
Receive and file draft minutes of the
Steering Committee
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the draft minutes of the Steering Committee meeting held on November 15,
1995, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed.
DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 13
Status report re County's Commingled Investment Pool
Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager of Operations, gave a brief report on
the status of the Orange County Commingled Investment Pool Committee and the
County of Orange bankruptcy.
-8-
0
12/13/95
DISTRICT 1
Second reading of or000sed
Ordinance No. 128
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That proposed Ordinance No. 128, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Providing for an Early
Retirement Incentive Program by Granting Additional Service Credit to Eligible
Districts' Employees as Authorized by the County Employees' Retirement Law of
1937, Government Code Section 31641.04, be read by title only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirely be,
and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 128 by title
only.
DISTRICT 1
Adooting Ordinance No. 128
Moved, seconded, and duly carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Pat McGuigan, Chair, James M. Ferryman, William G. Steiner
NOES: None
ABSTENTIONS: None
ABSENT: Mark A. Murphy, Thomas R. Saltarelli
That Ordinance No. 128. An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Providing for an Early
Retirement Incentive Program by Granting Additional Service Credit to Eligible
Districts' Employees as Authorized by the County Employees' Retirement Law of
1937, Government Code Section 31641.04, be, and is hereby, adopted.
DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 13
General Counsel's comments Prior to Closed Session
General Counsel reported to the Directors the need for a closed session as
authorized by Government Code Section 54956.9 to discuss and consider the items
that are specified as Items 15(b)(1), (2), (3), and (4) on the published Agenda.
General Counsel also indicated a need to add one item needing immediate action
that arose subsequent to the publication of the agenda. He reported that additional
-9-
4
12/13/95
items could be added pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2(b) upon a
two-thirds vote of the Directors. No other items would be discussed or acted upon.
DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 13
Add Item to the Closed Session Agenda
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That Item No. 15(d)(2)(a), (b), (c), and (d) re due diligence efforts re the proposed
acquisition of County Solid Waste Management System, be added to the Agenda.
DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7. 11 & 13
Convene in Closed Session pursuant to
Government Code Section 54956.9
The Boards convened in closed session at 7:58 p.m. pursuant to Government Code
Section 54956.9(a). Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Boards
of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code
Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of
Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. No actions were
taken re Agenda Items 15(b)(1), (2), (3) and (4).
DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 13
Reconvene in reaular session
At 8:57 p.m., the Boards reconvened in regular session.
DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 13
Actions re Due Diligence efforts re proposed
acquisition of County Solid Waste Management
System
General Counsel advised that the Ad Hoc Committee re Landfills had
recommended against approval of two recommendations which had been included
on the published supplemental agenda regarding authorizing staff to negotiate a
Professional Services Agreement for a financial advisor for an amount not to
exceed $50,000.00, and authorizing staff to negotiate a Professional Services
Agreement for a special bond counsel for an amount not to exceed $50,000.00.
It was then moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the above referenced recommendation of the Ad Hoc Committee be, and is
hereby, approved.
-10-
12/13/95
Authorizina staff to initiate Preliminary
efforts to file an application with Local
Aaencv Formation Commission (LAFCO)
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to request that the County Board of
Supervisors initiate preliminary efforts to file an application with LAFCO for
the purpose of forming a sanitation district.
Director Pat McGuigan requested that her abstention to this item be made a
matter of record. Directors John Collins, John M. Gullixson, Victor Leipzig,
and Bob Zemel requested that their opposition to this item be made a matter
of record.
Authorizing staff to assist the County Board of
Supervisors to complete a LAFCO application
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to assist the County Board of
Supervisors to complete and file an application with LAFCO.
Director Pat McGuigan requested that her abstention to this item be made a
matter of record. Directors John Collins, John M. Gullixson, Victor Leipzig,
and Bob Zemel requested that their opposition to this item be made a matter
of record.
DISTRICT 1
Ad ournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be
adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:58 p.m.
_11_
0
12/13/95
DISTRICT 2
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be
adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:58 p.m.
DISTRICT 3
AAd6ournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be
adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:58 p.m.
DISTRICT 5
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be
adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:58 p.m.
DISTRICT 6
Adioumment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be
adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:58 p.m.
DISTRICT 7
Adioumment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be
adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:58 p.m.
-12-
0
12/13/95
DISTRICT 11
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11
be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:58 p.m.
DISTRICT 13
Actions re adoption of Ordinance No. 1317
Makin finding that adoption of Ordinance No. 1317
is statutorily exempt per CEQA Guidelines
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance
No. 1317, An Urgency Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, Repealing Ordinance
Nos. 1315 and 1316, and Amending Ordinance No. 1311 Establishing
Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities,
is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15307 and 15308 in that the Ordinance
establishes regulatory processes to be taken by the District to assure the
protection of the environment and natural resources.
Reading of Proposed Ordinance No. 1317
Moved, seconded, and duly carried by unanimous vote:
That proposed Ordinance No. 1317, An Urgency Ordinance of the Board
of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County,
Repealing Ordinance Nos. 1315 and 1316, and Amending Ordinance
No. 1311 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of
District Sewerage Facilities, be read by title only, and that reading of said
Ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived.
-13-
0
12/13/95
Adoption of Ordinance No. 1317
Moved, seconded, and duly carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: John M. Gullixson, Chair, Burnie Dunlap, William G. Steiner,
Bob Zemel
NOES: None
ABSENT: Mark A. Murphy
That Ordinance No. 1317, An Urgency Ordinance of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County,
Repealing Ordinance Nos. 1315 and 1316, and Amending Ordinance
No. 1311 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of
District Sewerage Facilities, be, and is hereby, adopted as an urgency
measure to be effective immediately.
DISTRICT 13
Adiournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13
be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:5B p.m.
Secretary o tl a ds of Directors
of County itati Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, and 13
-14-
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 11/10195 PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 11/15/95 POSTING DATE 1 V15/95
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
148089 AS TECH COMPANY $51,564.98 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91
148090 ATM AA,INC. $990.00 LAB SERVICES
148091 ACCOUNTANTS OVERLOAD $908.50 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
148092 ACORN CONSULTING $5,135.00 CONSULTING SERVICES
148093 ACTION DOOR REPAIR CORP. $142.00 DOOR REPAIRS
148094 ADOHR FARMS $6.630.61 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148095 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $18,037.20 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.0.8-9.89
148096 ALLIED PACIFIC $6.437.06 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148097 AMERIDATA $4.664.73 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
148098 AMERICAN POWER PRODUCTS $222.51 TRUCK PARTS
148099 AMERICAN SIGMA $3.398.83 SAMPLER PARTS
148100 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION $6.414.21 SEWER REPAIRS
148101 ANIXTER-DISTRIBUTION $16,954.97 COMPUTER SUPPLIES
148102 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $1,622.41 NOTICES&ADS
148103 APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS,INC. $273.17 LAB SERVICES
148104 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $11,11W.04 COMPUTER PARTS
T71 14B705 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT $519.00 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
2 148108 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. $60.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL
.-, 148107 RANDOLPH AUSTIN CO. $576.18 LAB SUPPLIES
tC 148108 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $3.263.39 PAYROLL SERVICES
.� 148109 AWARDS&TROPHIES $264.94 PLAQUES
148110 BC WIRE ROPE&RIGGING $185.26 TRUCK PARTS
n 148111 BKK LANDFILL $70.910.71 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10.9-91
I� 148112 E S BABCOCK&SONS INC $555.00 LAB ANALYSIS
148113 BANANA BLUEPRINT $4.609.65 PRINTING M.O.11-07-94
148114 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $1,839.17 BATTERIES
148115 SAUER COMPRESSOR 1295.50 COMPRESSOR PARTS
148116 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $1,343.37 LAB SUPPLIES
148117 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $60.00 TRUCK WASH TICKETS
148118 BIOGRO DIVISION $40,413.68 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M04-28.95
148119 BON-A-RUES $782.32 TRUCK PARTS
148120 BOOTBARN $86.09 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES
148121 BORNEMANN PUMPS,INC. $1,438.97 PUMP PARTS
148122 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $26,036.72 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-18
148123 BUREAU OF BUSINESS PRACTICE $159.36 PUBLICATION-PAYROLL MANAGERS LETTER
140124 THE BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFFAIRS $775.80 SUBSCRIPTION-SAFETY LIBRARY SINGLE ON CD
148125 BUSH&ASSOCIATES,INC. $1.088.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6-8.94
148128 CCI TECHNOLOGIES $936.85 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
148127 CH2M HILL $131.752.23 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-31
148128 C.P.I. $802.85 LAB SUPPLIES
148129 CS COMPANY 554.31 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
148130 CWEA 1995 SRTC $740.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
148131 CADIRECTION $8,887.13 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
148132 CALFON CONSTRUCTION $247,610.86 CONSTRUCTION 7.22&7-24
148133 CALFON CONSTRUCTION $116,863.70 CONSTRUCTION 3.38.2
148134 CAMALI CORP. $400.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
FUNDING 9199 - H DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 11/10195 PAGE2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 11/15195 POSTING DATE 11/15195
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
148135 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $160,311.08 ENGINEERING SERVICES Pl-38,J-33
148136 SUSAN W.CASE $350.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES
148137 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $194.30 OFFICE FURNITURE
148138 CENTURY SAFETY INST.8 SUPPLY $1,385.42 SAFETY SUPPLIES
148139 CETAC TECHNOLOGIES,INC. $114.65 LAB SUPPLIES
148140 CLARKE CONTRACTING CO $298,935.00 CONSTRUCTION 7-W2
148141 CLEMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL $8.787.86 CONSULTANT-LANDFILL PROJECT NO 7-31A5
148142 COUCH&SONS $11,253.30 CONSTRUCTION 2-9-R182-36
148143 COUCH&SONS $149.958.70 CONSTRUCTION 11-17.1
148144 COMBUSTION CONTROLS $6.060.00 ELECTRIC PARTS
148145 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $11,637.93 ELECTRIC PARTS '
148146 CONSUMER PIPE $133.36 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
148147 CONTINENTAL EQUIPMENT SUPPLY $543.75 ELECTRIC PARTS
148148 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $23.866.10 ENGINE PARTS
148149 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $164.27 TRUCK PARTS
148150 COUNTERPART ENTERPRISES $648.35 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
nl 148151 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $151.87 ELECTRIC PARTS
X 148152 CREATE A PARTY RENTALS $1.421.50 FAMILY DAY-RENTAL EQUIPMENT
2
'-� 118153 CHARLES P.CROWLEV,CO. $907.44 INSTRUMENT PARTS
w 148154 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $8.880.00 UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE REIMB.
-I 148155 SWRCB/SIN FEES $250.00 WASTE DISCHARGE ANNUAL FEE
148156 DAPPERTIRE $202.31 TIRES
n 148157 ALBERT W DAVIES INC $301.600.86 CONSTRUCTION 3-36R
N 148158 DELL COMPUTER CORP $42,398.96 COMPUTER PARTS
148159 DIESEL S GAS TURBINE PUBS. $170.00 NOTICES B AOS
148160 DINNER AT EIGHT PRODUCTIONS $1,508.50 FAMILY DAY-MEALS
148161 DRVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $940.00 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE
148162 ROBERT F.DRIVER ASSOC. $117.780.00 PERSONNEL INSURANCE CONSULTANT
148163 ESP NORTH $139.86 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
148164 EDWARDS HIGH VACUUM INTER. $9.45 LAB SUPPLIES
148185 ELECTRO TEST,INC. $1,933.00 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
148166 ELSEVIER SCIENCE PUBLISHING $589.00 SUBSCRIPTION
148167 ENCHANTER,INC. $4,200.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5.24-95
140168 ENVIRONMENTAL PROD.USA $2.365.33 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
148169 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $867.70 LAB SERVICES
148170 EVEREST ELECTRONICS $2,569.18 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148171 FLUID TECH.SALES $2,190.95 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
148172 PST SAND AND GRAVEL,INC. $858.33 ROAD BASE MATERIALS
140173 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $15.807.79 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9.91
148174 FAVORITE FOODS INC $27,813.99 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148175 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $683.25 FILTERS
148176 FIRST CO 8/OR NORTHERN DIST. $391.02 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
148177 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $1.380.55 LAB SUPPLIES
148178 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $193.98 PHOTO SUPPLIES
148179 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $38.00 WATER USE
148180 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $525.00 FIRE DEPT PERMITS
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 11N0M5 PAGE 3 -
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 11/1"S POSTING DATE I II1SM5
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
148181 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $395.47 PAINT SUPPLIES
148182 FRYS ELECTRONICS $70S7 ELECTRONIC&COMPUTER SUPPLIES
148183 CST.INC. $11,101AB OFFICE SUPPLIES
148184 GTE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM $74,113.80 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT M09-27-95
148185 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $1,122.39 LUMBERMARDWARE
148186 GENERAL BINDING CORP. $547.26 OFFICE MACHINE REPAIRS
148187 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO $20,020.00 OCEAN OUTFALL BOOSTER STATION REPAIRS
148188 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $14.65 ELECTRICPARTS
148189 GENERAL PETROLEUM $14.345.94 DIESELFUNLEADED FUEL
148190 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1,089.52 TELEPHONE SERVICES
148191 N.GLANTZ&SON INC. $570.07 REFLECTIVE SHEETING
148192 DGA CONSULTANTS S4.630.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-8-94
148193 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $3,165.66 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
148194 HARTE-HANKS SHOPPERS $6,254A3 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148195 HATCH&KIRK,INC. $1,222.50 TRUCK PARTS
148196 PL HAWN CO,INC. $207.66 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
M 148197 HOLMES&RARVER,INC. $34,717.18 ENGINEERING SERVICES P114
X 148198 HOME DEPOT $103.16 SMALL HARDWARE
.s. 148199 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $1,104.62 PAINT SUPPLIES
CO 14821I0 RODNEY HUNT CO $905.10 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
148201 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $21,169.25 WATER USE
148202 CRY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $955.00 PERMIT FEES
D 148203 IPCO SAFETY $2.227.57 SAFETY SUPPLIES
W 148204 ISCO,INC. $250.00 INSTRUMENT
148205 INDUSTRIAL METAL SUPPLY CO. $817.82 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
148208 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $241.26 CONNECTORS
148207 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $40.23 WATER USE
148208 J2 PRINTING SERVICES $665.23 PRINTING
148209 JH RECOGNITION CO. $736.88 SERVICE AWARDS
148210 JAMISON ENGINEERING,INC. $950.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
148211 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY. $132.27 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
148212 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO. $84.33 GAUGE
148213 JIM'S SUSPENSION SERVICE $130.00 TRUCK REPAIRS
148214 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $1,610.14 ELECTRIC PARTS
148216 JONES CHEMICALS,INC. $10,831.30 SODIUM HYPOCHLORTTE MO 4-26-95
148216 KALLEEN'S COMPUTER PRODUCTS $688.84 COMPUTER SUPPLIES
148217 FRANCES L KALUZNY $1,320.00 HUMAN RESOURCES CONSULTANT
148218 KEYE PRODUCTIVITY CENTER $278.00 INVENTORY SEMINAR
148219 KIMMERLE BROS,INC. $1.738.07 MECHANICAL PARTS
148220 KING BEARING,INC. $1.261.94 MACHINE SUPPLIES
148221 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $230.09 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICE
148222 LEE&RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC. $8,382.44 ENGINEERING SERVICES P140.1
148223 LOCALAGENCY $450.00 LAFCO FEES
148224 SOCO-LYNCH CORP. $1,372.40 JANITORIAL SERVICES
14B225 MPS $179.83 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
148226 NSA $1.057.67 INSTRUMENT PARTS
FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 11110/95 PAGE4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 11/15195 POSTING DATE 11/15/95
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
148227 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS,INC. $820.79 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
146228 MANGAN,INC. $1.500.00 CONTRACT SERVICES
148229 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $10.99 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
148230 MCBAIN INSTRUMENTS $48.47 LAB SUPPLIES
148231 MCGARRY CENTRAL TYPEWRITER I $675.05 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
148232 MCMAHAN DESK,INC. $185.04 SAFETY SUPPLIES
148233 MIDWAY MFG.8 MACHINING $1.365.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS
148234 MILLTRONICS $4,160.73 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
148235 MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES CO $167.02 SET-UP CHARGE
148236 MISSION INDUSTRIES $4.191.06 UNIFORM RENTALS
146237 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO. $779.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS
148238 MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION $295,252.57 CONSTRUCTION 14-1-iA
148239 MORELAND B ASSOCIATES $3,963.25 AUDITING SERVICES MO 341-95
148240 NAT WEST MARKETS $11000.00 COP INTEREST DRAW FEES
148241 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION $95.00 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL
148242 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES $5,149.70 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES
>M 148243 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $988.63 SAFETY FILM RENTALS
148244 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $1,513.39 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
W 148245 NEW HORIZONS COMPUTER CENTERS,INC. $600.00 SOFTWARE TRAINING CLASSES
148246 NEWARK ELECTRONICS E697.40 INSTRUMENT PARTS
-I 148247 NICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY $6.517.53 LUBRICANTSIDIESEL FUEL
n 148248 BY NIELSON SERVICE INC $765.00 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
1 148249 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $4,084.83 OFFICE SUPPLIES
'C 148250 THEOHMARTCORP $197.34 INSTRUMENT PARTS
148251 OMEGA CORPORATION $412.50 SECURITY SYSTEM REPAIRS
148252 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $1,424.59 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
148253 ORANGE VALVE B FITTING CO. $359.37 FITTINGS
148254 OXYGEN SERVICE $2.019.78 SPECIALTY GASES
148255 COUNTY OF ORANGE $135.00 PERMITS
148256 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $19.724.59 REIMB.PETTY CASH,TRAINING 8 TRAVEL
148257 COUNTY OF ORANGE $3.865.00 PERMITS
148258 PSSI $1,494.46 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION
146259 PACIFIC CLIPPINGS $244.40 CONTRACT SERVICE
148260 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $1,426.46 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
148261 PACIFIC PARTS $45.190.17 INSTRUMENT PARTS
148262 PACIFIC BELL $109.65 TELEPHONE SERVICES
148263 PACIFIC WALK-IN MEDICAL $60.00 MEDICAL SERVICES
148264 PAGENET $98.34 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
148265 PARKHOUSE TIRE,INC. $051.23 TIRES
148266 PARTS UNLIMITED $176.43 TRUCK PARTS
148257 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $11.239.13 REIMB.PETTY CASH,TRAINING B TRAVEL
148260 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $102.227.40 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3.29-95
148269 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS $384,976.42 CONSULTING SERVICE
148270 THE PLANNING CENTER $10.000.00 PROPOSAL RESPONSIVE TO AB27688 AOMD 9495-31 RFP
148271 POLYPURE,INC. $29.360.57 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-71-92
148272 POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO. $61.19 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 11/10/95 PAGE 5
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 1111SMS POSTING DATE 11/15/95
WARRANTNO. VENDOR AMOUNT
148273 POWER TRANSMISSION SPECIALTI $1.657.86 MECHANICAL PARTS
148274 PRECISION ANODIZING $7,671,74 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148275 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $96.00 ICE FOR SAMPLES
146276 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE IND. $2,313.00 SOILTESTING
148277 PROMINENT FLUID CONTROL.INC. $57,160.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL
148278 PUMPING SOLUTIONS INC. $350.19 PUMP
148279 PRYOR RESOURCES INC. $125.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION
148280 RD SYSTEMS,INC. $636.73 INSTRUMENT PARTS
148251 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $3,458.51 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS
148252 R 8 R INSTRUMENTS $2,124.17 ELECTRIC PARTS
148283 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $2,062.76 TRASH REMOVAL
148284 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO. $498.59 LAB SUPPLIES
145285 REISH MARINE STUDIES,INC. $660.00 OCEAN MONITORING
148286 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $2.149.89 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
148287 RESTEK CORP $568.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
148288 ROSEN'S ELECTRIC $166.94 ELECTRIC PARTS
M 148289 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS $IT8.T0 ELECTRIC PARTS
X 148290 SANWA BANK $16,539.61 CONSTRUCTION 14.1.1A
148291 SANYO FISHER SERVICE CORP $21.85 PUBLICATION
Lb 148292 BASCO ELECTRIC $19.049.00 CONTRACT SERVICES
148293 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $3.376.68 SPECIALTY GASES
148294 SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS,INC. $1,283.00 LAB REPAIRS
D 148295 SEA COAST DESIGNS $734.62 LABSUPPLIES
r
148296 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $450.93 TOOLS
146297 SHASTA ELECTRIC E22,300.00 CONTRACT SERVICE-FIBER DUCT
148298 SHURELUCK SALES $11,618.89 TOOLSMARDWARE
148299 SIMS WELDING SUPPLY $1.00 DEMURRAGE
148300 SMITH-EMERY CO. $61.00 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-13.94
148301 THE SMITH GROUP $8.348.53 CONTRACT SERVICE
148302 SO COAST AIR QUALITY $13,208.38 PERMIT FEES
148303 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. $17.05 POWER
148304 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $2.825.73 NATURAL GAS
148305 THE TRANE COMPANY $2.000.00 STEAM PRESSURE CONTROLLERS
1483DS SO.CALIF.WATER CO. $68.09 WATER USE
148307 STANDARDS POORS CORP $2,500.00 COP CONTRACT SERVICE
148308 STATE STREET BANK $5,882.00 COP TRUSTEE SERVICES
146309 JOHN STEPHENS $2,470.00 OCEAN MONITORING
148310 STROMBERG PRODUCTS $579.08 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
148311 SUPELCO,INC. $390.69 LAB SUPPLIES
148312 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $64340 ELECTRIC CART PARTS
148313 TEKMAR COMPANY $957.16 LAB SUPPLIES
148314 TEXAS ANALYTICAL CONTROLS $74.00 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS
145315 TEXAS COMMERCE BANK $7,395.15 COP TRUSTEE SERVICES
148318 THEODORE ROBBINS FORD $2,909.24 VEHICLE RENTAL-SUMMER PROGRAM
148317 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $1,482.62 MECHANICAL PARTS
148318 TONER SYSTEM INTERNATIONAL $1,358.08 PRINTER SUPPLIES
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING GATE 11110M PAGES
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 11/15195 POSTING DATE 11/15/95
WARRANT NO. VENDOR
148319 TRENCH SHORING COMPANY $1,837.50 STEEL TRENCH TOPS
148320 TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY,INC. $3,973.84 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.O.5-11-94
148321 TRUCK 6 AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $567.16 TRUCK PARTS
148322 TRUESDAIL LABS $1.527.24 LAB SERVICES
148323 JO TUCKER&SON,INC. $788.21 INSTRUMENT PARTS
145324 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $23.00 LAB SUPPLIES
148325 UNISOURCEWOR BUTLER PAPER $10,378.48 OFFICE SUPPLIES
148325 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $56.15 PARCEL SERVICES
148327 VWR SCIENTIFIC $3.793.15 LAB SUPPLIES
14832E VERNE'S PLUMBING $160.00 PLUMBING SERVICES
148329 VILLA PARK ORCHARDS ASSPC. $25.293.77 RUFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148330 VILLAGE NURSERIES $169.92 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES
148331 WAL-CON CONSTRUCTION CO. $156.843.13 CONSTRUCTION 5-37-3
148332 DR.UBE WASHBURN $2,032.64 OCEAN RESEARCH
148333 WATERS CORPORATION SS34.57 SERVICE AGREEMENT
148334 WEATHER AND WIND INSTRUMENT $609.18 SAFETY
m 148335 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $29,598.29 CAUSTIC SODA MO&23-95
x 148336 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $1,167.67 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
s 148337 WESCO $2.023.23 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
148338 WGL ENTERPRISES $410.83 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148339 ROBERT WILLIAMS TREES $400.00 GROUNDSKEEPING
148340 WITEG $268.60 LAB SUPPLIES
148341 XEROX CORP. $10.798.99 COPIER LEASES
1 148342 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $62.74 LAB SUPPLIES
148343 JOHNSON YOKOGAWA CORP. $416.53 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 11/15195 $3,644,581.74
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 11I10195 PAGE 7 ,
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANFTATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 11/16/95 POSTING DATE 11/15/95
SUMMARY AMOUNT
#1 OPER FUND &231.50
#1 CONSTR FUND $1,345.57
02 OPER FUND $1.759.25
02 CAP FAC FUND $45,970.48
92 CONSTR FUND $4.694.95
#3 OPER FUND $25.127.00
#3 CAP FAC FUND $423.166.82
#3 CONSTR FUND $3.873.40
#5 OPER FUND 8429.80
#5 CONSTR FUND 81,076A9
06 OPER FUND $173.00
#6 CONSTR FUND $758.08
01 OPER FUND $8,864.61
07 CAP FAC FUND $550,170.55
#7 CONSTR FUND $1,307.43
#11 OPER FUND $249.25
X #11 CAP FAC FUND $202,677.12
Z 011 CONST FUND $1.197.87
#13 OPER FUND 88.50
DO #13 CONST FUND $3.40
#14 OPER FUND $50.OD
n #14 CAP FAC FUND $311,059.23
i #14 CONST FUND $19.98
V #5&6OPER FUND $166.94
#5&6 CAP FAC FUND $156,990.37
#7&14 OPER FUND 6794.77
JT OPER FUND $658.139.29
CORE $918.505.92
SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $19,724.59
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $306,045.29
$3.644,581.74
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 11=95 PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 1129195 POSTING DATE 1129195
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
148365 AG TECH COMPANY $64,563.71 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-&91
148366 ASL CONSULTING ENGINEERS $2,006.51 ATWOOD SUBTRUNK PLAN PREPERATION
148367 AT&T-MEGACOMSERVICE $2,553.66 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
148368 AT&T-PROWATTS $384.10 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
148369 AT&T-PRO WATTS $726.46 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
148370 AT&T-CELLULAR CR&R $8.84 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
148371 HWA SALES,INC. $2,638.68 ELECTRIC PARTS
148372 ACCURATE CIRCUIT ENGINEERING $215.29 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148373 ACORN CONSULTING 54,290.00 CONSULTING SERVICES
148374 ACROBURR $702.61 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148375 ALL-BANN ENTERPRISES,INC. $129.20 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148376 AMERIDATA $14,433.11 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
148377 AMERICAN AIRLINES $4,802.28 TRAVEL SERVICES
148378 AMERICAN METAL BEARING CO $118.30 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148379 ANGELICA HEALTHCARE SVC $18.610.04 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148380 ARTISTIC PLATING&METAL $840.27 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
m 148351 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE,INC. $1,552.00 TOXIC WASTE REMOVAL
X 148382 ATKIWJONES COMPUTER SERVICE $321.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT
= 148383 AURORAPUMP $3,784.18 PUMP PARTS
by 148M BFI MEDICAL WASTE SYSTEMS 54.00 WASTE DISPOSAL
148385 ES BABCOCK&SONS INC $825.00 LAB ANALYSIS
148386 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $37-7.13 BATTERIES
LA 148387 BAXTER HEALTH CARE CORP $918.93 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148388 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $9.904.68 LAB SUPPLIES
148389 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $528.75 TRUCK WASH TICKETS
148320 ABIEDERMAN INC $2,002.58 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
145391 BIOGRO DIVISION $45.315.84 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M04-2S95
148392 BLACK&VEATCH $1.313.17 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-25.1
M393 BLACK OXIDE INDUSTRIES $261.54 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148394 BLAIR-MARTIN CO,INC. $385.43 VALVE MANIFOLDS
148395 BOOTBARN $102.25 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES
148396 BNI BOOKS $100.26 BOOKS
148397 BUSH&ASSOCIATES,INC. $2,260.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.64494
IM398 CALTROL,INC. $843.04 HARDWARE
148399 CALIFORNIA CHASSIS INC. $579.50 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
146400 CALIF.ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS $120.88 MECHANICAL PARTS
148401 CALIFORNIA TRAILER PARK $166.47 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148402 CAMALI CORP. $725.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
148403 JOHN CAROL-0 ENGINEERS $7,129.86 O&M MANUAL REVISION
148404 JOHN CAROL-0 ENGINEERS $5,104.31 ENGINEERING SERVICES P"S,P243
149405 CARTER-AMER.FLEET SERVICE $135.51 AUTO PARTS
148406 CERFNET $35.60 COMPUTER SERVICES
148407 CHAPMAN COUNSELING $3,800.00 TEAMWORK TRAINING
148408 COLTON EQUIPMENT CO 5876.18 VALVE PARTS
148409 COMPUSERVE $144.84 COMPUTER SERVICES
14B410 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $2,268.52 ELECTRIC PARTS
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 11/22/95 PAGE 2 ,
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 1129195 POSTING DATE 1129195
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
145411 CONSUMER PIPE $767.05 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
148412 CONTROL CABLES INC $164.57 REPAIR PARTS
148413 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS O C $8,525.82 CONSULTING SERVICES M.O.&11.93
148414 COOK BROTHERS $1W.43 SAFETY VALVE
148415 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $13,176.44 ENGINE PARTS
148416 CORPORATE ENVIRON STRATEGY $185.W PUBLICATION
1411417 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $1,747.69 ELECTRIC PARTS
148418 CRANE PRO SERVICES $1,875.00 CRANE MAINTENANCE
145419 DANCO METAL SURFACING $2,675.52 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148420 THE DIAMOND GROUP $4,O00.00 CONSULTANT
149421 DYE TECHNIQUE $6,198.09 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148422 EL CORTEZ LODGE 5840.25 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148423 ELECTRONIC PRECISION SPEC $472.65 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148424 EMBEE INC S2 $1,181.62 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148425 ENCHANTER INC. $4.200.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5-2a95
148426 ESSEX GROUP $707.04 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
TT1 148427 EXCELLO CIRCUITS MFG CO $276.95 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
= 148428 FMC CORPORATION $86,061.93 HYDROGEN PEROXIDE MO 9-14.94
�-+ 148429 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $175.65 AIR FREIGHT
t 148430 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $233.49 FILTERS
-1 148431 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $278.26 LAB SUPPLIES
148432 FLOSYSTEMS $3.037.58 PUMP PARTS
�j 148433 FORESTRY SUPPLIES INC $237.46 LAB SUPPLIES
N 148434 CLIFFORD A.FORKERT $7,924.00 SURVEYING SERVICES MO 641-95
148435 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $125.20 PHOTO SUPPLIES
148436 FRYS ELECTRONICS $362.49 ELECTRONIC 8 COMPUTER SUPPLIES
148437 FRY'S METALS/ALPHA METALS $2.152.97 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148435 GST.INC. $8,505.54 OFFICE SUPPLIES
148439 GANAHLLUMBERCO. 5581.31 LUMBERHARDWARE
148440 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO $1,190.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES
148441 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $117.34 ELECTRIC PARTS
148442 GENERAL PETROLEUM $6,909.11 DIESEL/UNLEADED FUEL
148443 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $6,726.84 TELEPHONE SERVICES
148W GIERLICH-MTTCHELL,INC. $19,637.44 PUMP PARTS
146445 DGA CONSULTANTS $8.336.43 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6b94
140W DAVID R.GRIFFIN $9.320.94 LEGAL SERVICES-TECHTTE PIPE M.O.9-14.94
148447 HR EFFECTIVENESS INC $647.73 PUBLICATION
146448 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $1,232.07 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
148449 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS $2.575.00 CONTAINER RENTALS
148450 HAWK INDUSTRIAL INIFORM $143.51 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148451 HELLO DIRECT $167.67 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
148452 HELPMATES PERSONNEL SERVICES $2,302A0 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
148453 HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT $2,083.33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN.
146454 HOLMES 8 NARVER,INC. $29,219.46 ENGINEERING SERVICES Pl-0
145455 HOME DEPOT $385.77 HARDWARE
148456 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $765.85 PAINT SUPPLIES
FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 11/22/95 PAGES
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 11/29/95 POSTING DATE 11/P9/95
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
148457 HYCLONE LABORATORIES INC $908.47 LAB SUPPLIES
148458 IPCO SAFETY $1.759.34 SAFETY SUPPLIES
148459 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $121.671.33 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11-18-92
148460 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $279.62 CONNECTORS
148461 INORGANIC VENTURES $320.40 LAB SUPPLIES
148462 INSIDE EPA $890.00 SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL
148463 INTERCHEM CORP $248.55 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148464 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $1,006.60 BATTERIES
148465 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $33.83 WATER USE
145466 J2 PRINTING SERVICES $1,364.62 PRINTING
146467 J 5 H DEBURRING $925.60 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148468 JAMISON ENGINEERING,INC. $24,568.19 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
148469 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY. $462.41 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
148470 JAYS CATERING $1,038.69 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE
148471 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $821.34 ELECTRIC PARTS
m 148472 KMI INDUSTRIES $151.59 PVC FITTINGS
x 148473 FRANCES L.KALUZNY $1,680.00 HUMAN RESOURCES CONSULTANT
2 148474 KARS'ADVANCED MATERIALS,INC. $2,467.00 MACHINE TESTING
t- 148476 KING BEARING,INC. $165.37 MACHINE SUPPLIES
148476 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $16.062.13 TOOLS
148477 KONICA PHOTO WEST $156.53 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
to 148478 LAGUNA TREE SERVICE $1,990.00 GROUNDSKEEPING
148479 LASERALL CORP. $171.00 PRINTER REPAIR
W 148480 LAW/CRANDAL,INC. $2.508.25 SOIL TESTING 7.13.94
148481 LAYTON SOFT WATER $1.179.09 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148482 LEE 8 RO CONSULTING ENGR. $17,857.98 ENGINEERING SERVICES P140-2
148483 LEEWARD SHELVING B FILE SYS. $69.92 OFFICE SUPPLIES
148484 MEC ANALYTICAL SYSTEMS INC. $8,842.00 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING
148485 MACDONALD-STEPHENS ENDS $6,585.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES
148488 MACOMCO $464.10 SERVICE AGREEMENT
148487 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $351.669.00 CONSTRUCTION PI-36-2
148488 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $25.225.00 CONSTRUCTION P242-2
148489 MARUCHAN INC $4.459.39 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148490 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $545.02 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
148491 MASKTECHNOLOGY $265.64 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148492 MC FADDEN DALE HARDWARE CO $77.36 TRUCK PARTS
148493 MEASUREMENT VARIABLES $1.083.54 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
148494 MIDWAY MFG.B MACHINING $3.780.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS
148495 MILLTRONICS $154.65 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
148496 MISSION ABRASIVE SUPPLIES $79.21 SAFETY SUPPLIES
148497 MISSION INDUSTRIES $1,723.24 UNIFORM RENTALS
148498 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $2.85 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
149499 HICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY $590.77 LUBRICANTSIDIESEL FUEL
148500 NORTEL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS $2,754.0D TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS
148501 OI CORPORATION $264.61 LAB SUPPLIES
148502 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $604.30 SAFETY GLASSES
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 1122/95 PAGE4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 1129195 POSTING DATE 1129195
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
148503 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $384.18 OFFICE SUPPLIES
148504 BYUNG YOON OH $11,142.40 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148505 THE OHMART CORP $435.51 SAFETY VIDEOS
148506 OPP-TIMUM WOODWORKING $6.120.00 OFFICE FURNITURE
148507 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $654.06 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
148508 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. $416.32 FITTINGS
148509 OXYGEN SERVICE $1,629.11 SPECIALTY GASES
148510 COUNTY OF ORANGE $45.00 ADMINISTRATIVE FEES
148511 COUNTY OF ORANGE $3.276.00 PERMITS
146512 COUNTY OF ORANGE $301.00 SURVEY SERVICES
148613 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT $39,952.10 GAP WATER USE M.O.S-9.93
148614 PSSI $1,026.45 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION
148515 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $740.78 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
148516 PACIFIC PARTS $1,431.43 INSTRUMENT PARTS
148517 PACIFIC BELL $1.346.07 TELEPHONE SERVICES
148518 PAKWEST $1,704.61 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
M 148519 PARALLAX EDUCATION $92800 TRAINING REGISTRATION -MANAGEMENT
X 148520 PARKHOUSE TIRE,INC. $364.80 TIRES
148521 PARTS UNLIMITED $207.57 TRUCK PARTS
Od 148522 PASCAL&LUDWIG,INC. $54,172.80 CONSTRUCTION P1-3&2
148523 PERMA PURE INC. $8,999.63 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
148524 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $6,989.52 REIMS.PETTY CASH,TRAINING&TRAVEL
148525 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $107,638.20 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3.29.95
t 148526 PIN POINT SOFTWARE $648.61 SOFTWARE
148527 POLYCLAD LAMINATES INC $1,525.72 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
10528 POLYMETRICS,INC. $1,262.75 LAB SUPPLIES
148529 POLYPURE,INC. $19,094.58 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92
148530 PORT SUPPLY $29.93 DRAFTING SUPPLIES
146531 POSTAGE BY PHONE 95,000.00 POSTAGE
148532 POWER CIRCUITS $2,490.07 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148533 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $88.00 ICE FOR SAMPLES
148534 PRYOR REPORT $195.00 TRAINING-MANAGEMENT
148535 PUBLIC SECTOR EXCELLENCE 93,105.00 TRAINING CONSULTANT
148536 PUMPING SOLUTIONS INC $4,340.39 PUMP PARTS
148537 R&R INSTRUMENTS $285.41 ELECTRIC PARTS
148530 RED WING SHOES $375.83 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES
148539 THE REGISTER $900.80 NOTICES&ADS
148540 REMEDYTEMP $10,001.11 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
148541 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $550.42 GAUGE
148542 ROCKWELL INTERNATIONAL AI $194.85 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148543 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTL $150,010.31 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.641-94
148544 R.CRAIG SCOTT&ASSOC. $1.652.40 LEGAL SERVICES-PERSONNEL ISSUES
148545 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $438.70 SPECIALTY GASES
148546 SEA COAST DESIGNS E659.37 LAB SUPPLIES
148547 SECHRIST INDUSTRIES INC 8491.05 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148548 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $1,079.92 TOOLS
FUNDING 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 1MM5 PAGES
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 1129N5 POSTING DATE 1129195
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
148549 SHASTA ELECTRIC $38.19SA5 ADMINISTRATION REWIRE
148550 SHEPHERD MACHINERY CO. $791.44 TRUCK PARTS
148551 SHURELUCK SALES $3.490.60 TOOLSAHARDWARE
148552 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $92.24 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS
148553 SMITH PIPE&SUPPLY $816.03 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
148554 SOLDER STATION ONE $1,362.88 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
14B555 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO $44,966.66 POWER
1485M SO CAL GAS CO $23.371.83 NATURAL GAS
148557 SO.CALIFORNIA MARINE INST. $800.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
148558 SOUTHERN CALIF TRANE SER $2.000.00 STEAM PRESSURE CONTROLLERS
148559 SOUTHWEST FOODS INC. $499.93 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148560 SOUTHWEST INSTRUMENTS $438.85 INSTRUMENT PARTS
148561 SPIRE TECHNOLOGIES SYS DIV $12,345.00 SOFTWARE
148562 SPNECO INC. $370.32 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148563 SUMMIT STEEL $2.788.96 METAL
148564 SUNCLIPSE,INC. 541,485.74 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
X 148565 SUNSET INDUSTRIAL PARTS $76.96 HOSE FITTINGS
= 148566 SUPELCO,INC. $169.40 LAB SUPPLIES
�-+ 148567 SUPERB ONE-HOUR PHOTO $55.69 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
146568 SUPER CHEM CORP. $1.209.55 CHEMICALS
-1 148569 SUPER POWER PRODUCTS $258.60 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
la 148670 SUPERIOR PLATING $256.69 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
I 148571 TAGGIN WAGGON MOBILEHOME PA $552.99 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
N 148572 TARGET CHEMICALS $452.46 FERTILIZER B RAT BAIT
148573 TAYLOR-OUNN MFG.COMPANY $60.55 ELECTRIC CART PARTS
148574 TEKDRAULICS $5.807.99 MECHANICAL PARTS
148575 TEKMAR COMPANY $175.44 LAB SUPPLIES
148576 TEKTRONIX,INC. $602.10 INSTRUMENT PARTS
148577 TEXAS ANALYTICAL CONTROLS $60.51 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS
148578 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $1,055.76 MECHANICAL PARTS
148579 TOLEDO SCALE CORP. $1,000.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
148580 TONY'S LOCK&SAFE SERVICE $95.17 LOCKS&KEYS
148581 TRIPLE M PACKING $529.73 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148582 W.L.TROXEL B ASSOC. $750.00 CONTRACT SERVICE
148583 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $184.28 TRUCK PARTS
148584 TRUESDAIL LABS $326.86 LAB SERVICES
148685 TINNING LABORATORIES $6.633.10 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-13-94
148586 U.S.AUTO GLASS CENTERS $159.76 TRUCK PARTS
148587 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $252.00 LAB SUPPLIES
148588 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $303.67 PARCEL SERVICES
148589 UNIVERSAL CIRCUITS INC $1,006.46 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148590 VWR SCIENTIFIC $1,258.31 LAB SUPPLIES
148591 VANIER BUSINESS FORMS $975.95 OFFICE SUPPLIES
148592 VARIAN ASSOCIATES INC $1,290.94 LAB SUPPLIES
148593 INDIRA VENKATESEN $1,860.00 OCEAN MONITORING WORKSHOP
148594 VERNE'S PLUMBING 570.00 PLUMBING SERVICES
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1122J95 PAGES
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 1129/95 POSTING DATE 1129/95
WARRANT NO. VENDOR
148595 WACKENHUT CORP. $14,3D0.70 CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS
148596 WALL STREET JOURNAL E3D6.01 SUBSCRIPTION
148597 WARREN GORHAM&LAMONT INC S19074 PUBLICATION
148598 WAXIE $222.71 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
148599 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $23.912.54 CAUSTIC SODA MO 8.23-95
148600 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $813.23 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
148601 WESCO $574.93 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
148602 WOLFE AND ASSOCIATES,INC. $3.949.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
148603 ROURKE,WOODRUFF&SPRADUN $92.805.61 LEGAL SERVICES MO7-26-95
148604 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $979.54 LAB SUPPLIES
148605 JOHNSON YOKOGAWA CORP. $81.96 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 1129I95 $1.851,112.20
m
X SUMMARY AMOUNT
2
W #2 OPER FUND $14.25
#2 CAP FAC FUND $2.041.51
93 OPER FUND $52.621.92
w #3 CAP FAC FUND $23.926.29
m #5 OPER FUND $689.25
#7 OPER FUND $430.42
#7 CAP FAC FUND $20.292.92
#11 OPER FUND $9.593.96
#14 0PER FUND $1,940.43
#14 CAP FAC FUND $2.622.75
0586 OPER FUND $17.80
#687 OPER FUND $211.12
#7&14 OPER FUND $16.59
JT OPER FUND $913.082.79
CORF $569,880.05
SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $28,159.68
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $225.570.47
$1,851.112.20
SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
REGULAR MEETING
JANUARY 24, 1996 - 7:30 P.M.
RE: AGENDA ITEM NO, 4
Minute excerpts have been received as set forth below. Pursuant to Regular Agenda Item No. 4, it
is appropriate to receive and file said excerpts:
(4) (a) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts from the following re
election of mayors and appointment of alternate Directors, as follows: ('Mayor)
City/Aoencv District Active Director Alternate Director
Buena Park 3 Don R. Griffin Palsy Marshall'
Brea 2.3 & 13 Bumie Dunlap- Glenn Parker
Fountain Valley 2 & 3 John Collins George Scott'
Fullerton 2 & 3 Chris Norby Don Bankhead
La Habra 2 & 3 James H. Flora Steve Anderson'
Los Alamitos 3 Charles E. Sylvia Robert Wahlstrom•
Placentia 2 Norman Z. Eckenrode Carol Downey'
Stanton 3 Sal A. Sapien Harry M. Dotson
Yorba Linda 2 Daniel T. Welch John M. Gullixson'
13 John M. Gullixson' Daniel T. Welch
Midway City 3 Margie L. Rice James V. Evans
Sanitary District
Irvine Ranch 14 Peer A. Swan Darryl G. Miller
Water District
[ITEM NO. 4 CONTINUED ON PAGE 2]
01/24)gs
(4) (b) DISTRICTS 3 & 11
Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept resignation of Mayor Dave Sullivan of
the City of Huntington Beach from the Boards of Directors of Districts Nos. 3 and 11, and
seating first and second alternates to the mayor, as follows:
District Active Director Alternate Director
3 & 11 Victor Leipzig Ralph Bauer
11 Shirley Dettloff Ralph Bauer
(c) DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept resignation of Mayor Duane Schuster
of the City of La Palma from the Board of Directors of District No. 3, and seating first and
second alternates to the mayor, as follows:
District Active Director Alternate Director
3 Wally Linn Eva G. Miner
(d) Consideration of motion to receive and file any minute excerpts received subsequent to
preparation of supplemental agenda, if any
J:Wrooaeswcse SA.m
- 2 -
JM-23-96 )UE 16:10 P, OI
PILLSBURY MADISON 6 SUTRO
San Francisco 101 V. Broadway Loa Angeles
S. lose Suite 18DO Vwahingtoa, D.C.
Sacramento San Diego, CA 92101-8083 Orange County
Menlo Park Tel (619)234-5000 Fax (619)236-1995 New York
Bong Kong Tokyo
January 23, 1996
FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL
Toe Blake Anderson (714) 962-0356
Paul Brady (714) 724-6045
Andrew Czorny (714) 378-3372
Walter Kreutzen (714) 436-9849
Michael D. Martello (415) 967-4215
John L. Nelson (714) 662-3570
Stan Oftelie (714) 560-5796
Kennard R. Smart (714) 835-7787
Alan G. Tipple (213) 629-4520
Merrill R. Francis (223) 620-1398
G. Larry Engel (714) 752-7522
Allan H. Ickowitz (213) 612-7001
Clark P. Ide (714) 378-3373
Paul R. Glassman (310) 312-9507
John T. Hansen (425) 398-24AR
Alan Martin (714) 851-0739
Thomas L. Woodruff 1714) B35-7787
John J. Giovannone (714) 051-0739
M. Freddie Reiss (213) 622-5063t
Michael Ozawa (714) 435-8774
Jon Schots (310) 820-0313
FROM: Patrick C. Shea, Esq. OSBR MO.R11364PCS
(J. Samala)
PILE NO. : 66345-100-0001
NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER SHEET: 3
IF YOU HAVE NOT PROPERLY RECEIVED THIS FACSIMILE,
PLEASE CALL US AT (619)234-5000
THANK YOU.
Letter to Pool Participants regarding status of Merrill Lynch
litigation.
OPERATOR: TIME ENT:
h TSE MORRATDOR COSTAIWm EAC6 SAG% IS ATIORMEY PRIVILE01,AND OMFMENTIAL IAYONV RD O—n WE
OP THE IR rMML OR E W RA:OD ARM. 17 TSB RGDPR OF= RESEAM 19 SOP IRS IRTUMED RRCIPIRET, OR THE VeLOTEE OR MEET
REBPORSIELE TO DELIVER TT 1R THE INLENZ) RECIPIEIT. YOU ARE P,ERRe1 NOTIFIED TEAT MET numaRAT10S. DISTAUMM OR OOnum OF
n ATI ne OlMnGOH u anICM.Y PHOauLTSD. IT TOO RAY6 RScmw M. CONTM1=0 n Exmn' PLEASE na®ummy son" OS BY
TEISYEONE, ANO RETURN TIM ORIDIRN.RER50E TO US AT THE ABOVE ADDRESS Vu THE R.S. POSTAL SERVILR. TIM no.
20701051
JAN-23-96 TILE m I 1 r. UL
IAW DiiIC LS Ei
PILLSBURY MADISON & SUTRO LLP
6.w rNm ascD sun. 1600
LD59NOELeS JOLE 101 WEST DROAO Y ONNG6 COVNry
LAN
9AC Nw N6NT0
WALnln cio N,D.E. SAN alEGO, CALIFORNIA 9$101 NExw Aaxx
WAIT[A•6 Oi iICL AND TOLEpNON[P.912] -GODO TO NYO
D IRCCT pqL NUN B.R i1OBI M IL8 W IIII..G-1... MONO LO Nc
MEW YO RR
(619) 544-3177
January 22, 1996
VIA TELECOPIER
TO: ORANGE COUNTY INVESTMENT POOL
PARTICIPANTS ' DISTRIBUTION LIST
Re; In re County Of Orange,
Bankruptcy Case No. SA94-272-JR
County of Orange v, Merrill Lynch & Co. , Inc. et al.
Dear Pool Participant:
This letter will update you regarding the status of the
County of Orange litigation against Merrill Lynch.
The principal parties have commenced taking depositions.
Merrill Lynch appeared in Court today on a motion to stay the
County's discovery until the depositions of Merrill Lynch
employees can be coordinated with discovery proceedings in other
bankruptcy-related litigation. Specifically, Merrill Lynch
sought to avoid producing its representatives for deposition,
including Mr. Michael Stamenson, until the County filed all of
its complaints against other professionals and brokerage houses.
Merrill Lynch argued that its representatives would otherwise
risk being deposed in each adversary proceeding. (There are
currently only two filed adversary proceedings - Merrill Lynch
and MPMG Peat Marwick. ) In addition, Merrill Lynch sought to
lift the current stay on obtaining documents and testimony from
Pool Participants. The Merrill Lynch motion was unsuccessful on
both issues.
In denying the Merrill Lynch request for consolidation, the
Court reiterated its intention that the parties proceed with all
non-Pool Participant discovery without limitation. In addition,
the Court continued the stay on pool participants discovery to
pending the hearing on the County's motion to strike portions of
the Merrill Lynch Answer. That motion is scheduled to be heard
February 16, 1996 at 9:30 a.m.
JAN-23-96 THE 16:06 r. ub
To All Pool Participants
January 22, 1996
Page 2
The parties reached an agreement regarding the exchange of
SEC transcripts . Pursuant to this arrangement, Merrill Lynch
and the County will exchange all SEC transcripts. The employees
of Merrill Lynch and the County, including the Board of
Supervisors, were given ten days to object to the production of
their transcripts. If no objection is asserted, the transcript
must be produced.
Finally, the Court ruled that the deposition of Mr.
Stamenson will go forward on January 29, 1996. Mr. Stamenson
has until January 25, 1996 to file any objection to the
production of his SEC transcript. The Court has scheduled a
hearing for Friday, January 26, 1996 at 3:30 p.m. to rule on the
objections, if any.
In general, theserulings indicate an intent by the Court
to keeping the case moving.
I will continue to keep you updated regarding the status of
this matter. if you have any questions, you can reach me at
(619) 544-3177 .
Very truly yours"
fits�t—
Patrick C. Shead""5
PCs/sgm
cc: Official Committee of Pool Participants and Counsel
1085)059
t
6
LAM OFFICES OF
PILLSBURY MADISON & SUTRO LLP
LOS nNGELES SUITE 1800 MENLO PARK
NEW YOPR ORANGE GOUNTY
SACRANENTO 101 WEST BROADWAY A. DI.GO
ww HINGTON.CO SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92101-e201 SAN .I K.
c.CSC. SONG I(orvG
TOKYO TELEPHONE (619) 234-5000
FACSIMILE (619) 236-IOSS
WRITER'S OFFICE ANO
DIRECT VIAL NUN.ER
(619) 544-3177
December 27, 1995
TO: ORANGE COUNTY INVESTMENT POOL
PARTICIPANTS ' DISTRIBUTION LIST
Re: In re County of Orange, Case No. SA94-22272-JR
"JOINT AGREEMENT" PROPOSED BY THE COUNTY OF ORANGE FOR
THE RESOLUTION OF POOL-RELATED CLAIMS OF OPTION A POOL
PARTICIPANTS, AND OTHER RELATED MATTERS
Dear Pool Participant:
Enclosed herewith you will find an execution copy of an
agreement entitled JOINT AGREEMENT OF THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, THE
OFFICIAL INVESTMENT POOL PARTICIPANTS' COMMITTEE AND EACH OPTION
A POOL PARTICIPANT FOR RESOLUTION OF CLAIMS AGAINST THE COUNTY
OF ORANGE ( "Joint Agreement" ) along with an Executive Summary
relating to that agreement.
This proposed Joint Agreement by the County is intended to
address the treatment of the remaining claims of Option A Pool
Participants allowed under the Comprehensive Settlement
Agreement ( "CSA" ) , and to address certain other specific matters
related to the interests of Pool Participants.
While the Joint Agreement is not a Plan of Adjustment, if
executed by your government entity, it will have material impact
on your right to participate in the Plan of Adjustment process,
and will, to a large extent, define your entitlements under the
Plan of Adjustment. This is obviously a very important
document. It is technically drafted and requires your -
attention, along with the specific advice of your own financial
and legal professionals.
As with the Comprehensive Settlement Agreement, the
financial and legal professionals of the OCIP Committee are
unable to act as advisors to you on an individual basis.
Rather, the financial and legal advisors to the OCIP
Committee have prepared the Executive Summary which accompanies
20846332
r
s
i
December 27, 1995
Page 2
this letter to assist you in understanding the Joint Agreement.
The impact of the Joint Agreement will be different for
virtually every individual government agency and, as a result,
the analysis required must be done by each agency on an
individual basis.
To put the Joint Agreement in context, it is important to
briefly review the history of this case as it pertains to Pool
Participants.
On December 6, 1994, the County of Orange filed two
separate bankruptcy cases: one for the County (In Re Count of
To—
Orange, Bankruptcy Case No. SA94-22272-JR) and one o an entity
o t e County entitled The Orange County Investment Pools (In Re
Orange County Inestment Pools, Bankruptcy Case No. SA94-22�
JR) . T e i inv
g ot t ese two separate bankruptcy cases was
intended by the County to identify the separate assets and
interests of the Pools as opposed to the rights of general
creditors of the County of Orange. There may have also been a
political interest in attempting to distance the County of
Orange from the operations of the Treasurer's Office in
connection with the investment decisions leading up to the
$1.64 billion loss sustained by the Pool.
Shortly after the filing of the bankruptcy cases, the
County announced its intent to challenge the entitlement of Pool
Participants to recover their deposits in the Pool under the
provisions of California law intended to protect Pool
Participant deposits from invasion by a County under
circumstances mirroring those in this case. (California
Government Code S 27100. 1, and others . ) Long term denial of
access by Pool Participants to their deposits in the Orange
County Investment Pools threatened the economic viability of a
substantial number of Pool Participants.
After the filing of the two bankruptcy cases, the United
States Trustee for the Central District of California, Marcy
Tiffany, formed a special committee to represent Pool depositors
in the Pool case. This committee consists of seven members:
Chairman, Stan Oftelie of the Orange County Transportation
Authority ( "OCTA" ) ; Andrew Czorny of the Orange County Water
District; Blake Anderson of the Orange County Sanitation
District; Paul Brady, City Manager of the City of Irvine
(representing a special subcommittee of Orange County cities) ;
John Nelson, Assistant Superintendent of the Orange County
Department of Education (representing a special subcommittee of
Orange County schools) ; Walter Kreutzen of the Transportation
Corridor Agencies; and Michael Martello, City Attorney of the
City of Mountain View (representing a special subcommittee of
2DB46332
December 27, 1995
Page 3
non-Orange County agencies) . This committee became known as the
OCIP Committee.
The OCIP Committee began meeting almost daily in early
January and crafted, along with the County, an interim funding
mechanism to meet the emergency needs of Pool Participants. The
intent of that facility was to provide the minimal funding
required to keep the constituent agencies of the OCIP
financially alive during the time necessary to resolve the
dispute between the OCIP Committee and the County regarding Pool
Participants ' entitlement to their deposits in the investment
pools. That interim facility operated successfully through May
of 1995 and disbursed over $900,000,000. During that same
period of time, the Pool Committee conducted extensive financial
analysis and legal research on the issue of whether Pool
Participants could recover all their deposits from the Orange
County Investment Pools, leaving the County to bear the entire
$1.64 billion loss against their December 6, 1994 deposit
balance of approximately $2 .3 billion.
There was support for that position, including the specific
intent of Government Code 5 27100. 1, the reliance of Pool
Participants upon the County for investment policies and capital
protection, and the revelation of numerous financial
irregularities relating to Pool Participants ' interests in the
Pools pre-bankruptcy (the skimming of interest, misallocation of
assets, and other similar activities) . In other words, there
were good legal and equitable arguments for requiring the County
to sustain the loss in the Investment Pools from its own deposit
balance.
However, there was another side to the argument.
Notwithstanding the culpability of the County for the
intentional and unintentional losses in the Pools, certain
principles that apply generally in bankruptcy cases, though
never specifically applied to a case of this type, provided the
possibility for a different result.
These arguments, in brief, start with the general disfavor
trust interests are accorded in bankruptcy cases, because such
interests run contrary to general bankruptcy concepts of
equitable distribution to similar claimants. Additionally, the
legal foundation for the trust position asserted by Pool
Participants in this case was uniquely a matter of California
law. There was thus the potential for statutory interpretation,
and Tenth Amendment Constitutional issues, to be in controversy.
Specifically, it was unclear whether California was entitled to
structure a unique distribution priority for municipal entities
in bankruptcy inconsistent with general bankruptcy principles.
20846532
December 27, 1995
Page 4
In other words the issue presented a case of first
impression with billions of dollars, and the economic lives of
the Pool Participants, at stake, and good arguments on both
sides .' Moreover, a number of Pool Participants had municipal
financings coming due in June of 1995 for which a substantial
portion of their Pool deposits were required. Litigation of the
trust issue, even if successful at the trial court level, would
if appealed probably not produce an actual disbursement of funds
by the County within the timeframe necessary to meet the June 30
1 As most of you know, the issue of the trust status of the
Orange County Investment Pools was recently litigated in the
context of a Motion to Dismiss brought by Merrill, Lynch,
Pierce, Fenner 6 Smith in the case filed against it by the
County. Among other arguments, Merrill Lynch contended that,
under California Government Code S 27100. 1, the assets in the
Orange County Investment Pools belonged to Pool Participants,
not the County. Further, any losses sustained by the Pool would
be losses of the Pool Participants, not the County.
On December 1, 1995, Bankruptcy Judge John Ryan addressed
for the first time the critical trust issue in the context of
the Merrill Lynch motion. Judge Ryan denied the motion. In his
opinion, Judge Ryan specifically found that here where the trust
managed by the County is assumed to be insolvent, and where
deposits can not be definitively traced, the trust fails and the
Pool assets become assets of the County of Orange. Judge Ryan
concluded that the protection to Pool Participants under
Government Code S 27100. 1 failed because it was inconsistent
with the federal bankruptcy principle of equitable, uniform
distribution of assets in insolvent estates .
While it is unclear whether this decision would have been
the same had it been litigated earlier, and it is equally
unclear whether it will withstand appeal, at least on the face
of it a good argument can be made that had the OCIP Committee
elected to litigate the trust theory back in May of this year,
the court would have made the same findings, in which case the
County would have had access to the entire $5.3 billion proceeds
from the sale of the Pool securities. The County would then
have been entitled to distribute those proceeds to its unsecured
creditors, including all municipal noteholders, vendors and all
labor claimants, along with Pool Participants. Under those
circumstances, the recovery by Pool Participants would have been
much less than the $4 . 1 billion in cash recovered so far. The
County's "fresh start" may have occurred months ago at the cost
of the financial vitality of numerous Pool Participants.
20846332
December 27, 1995
Page 5
deadline for Pool Participants having municipal obligations
maturing at that time.
The Pool Committee crafted with the County a "settlement"
of its collective claims of entitlement to all Pool Participant
deposits under the trust theory in an agreement entitled the
"Comprehensive Settlement Agreement" ( "CSA") . Under this
agreement, approximately 80% of non-school deposit balances and
90% of school deposit balances have been or should shortly he
released. The remaining account balances would be allowed in
full; however, there would be different repayment entitlements
on those balances. A portion of the remaining balance would be
entitled to general unsecured creditor treatment with a credit
enhancement from recoveries from third party litigation
( "Settlement Secured Claims") , and another portion would he in a
subordinated position ( "Repayment Claims" ) . This compensation
package was available to Pool Participants agreeing to assign
and collectivize their claims against third party defendants.
Most Pool Participants elected this option. Fourteen Pool
Participants, primarily non-Orange County entities, elected a
different package of compensation, retaining their third-party
litigation rights.
Approximately $4. 1 billion dollars has been distributed to
Pool Participants to date in accordance with the CSA.
The County has since been unsuccessful in obtaining
taxpayer funding to refill the $1.64 billion dollar hole left by
the losses sustained by the Pool, and the amounts of deficit
hidden until the filing of the bankruptcy case. The County was
successful in obtaining the agreement of noteholders to the idea
of "rolling" their obligations from fiscal 1994-1995 into fiscal
1995-1996, a procedure which on its face appears to contradict
several government code statutes and Constitutional provisions.
The OCZP Committee raised these issues before the Bankruptcy
Court, without success, and those issues are now on appeal.
Since August of this year, the County has attempted to
craft a Plan of Adjustment which would allow it to emerge from
bankruptcy. For a number of reasons, including its diminished
credit rating and its inability to obtain any tax revenue from
its citizens, the County's plan for recovery inevitably turned
back to the revenues and assets of Pool Participants whose
financial condition and operations were more regularly
conducted, and whose economic health was more vital.
The initial assault by the County was across the board to
the interests of virtually all Pool Participants. Legislative
realities circumscribed the County's efforts. Ultimately, a
20846332
,
December 27, 1995
Page 6
legislative package was approved which, in essence, calls for
the State to divert a net amount of $15 million per year for
15 years from the Orange County Transportation Authority and
$12 million per year for 20 years from Harbors, Beaches and
Parks, the Flood Control District, and the County Development
Agency. These diverted funds will be pledged to finance the
issuance of new municipal debt, the proceeds of which will be
used to pay off the "rolled" municipal debt and other
obligations of the County.
While the legislative package is still violative of the
interests of some Pool Participants, and will have an impact on
transportation and on future infrastructure construction in
Orange County, it was considered the least destructive of the
various alternatives that were considered by the legislature.
However, this limited invasion of Pool Participants ' assets was
crafted with certain expectations relating to the remaining
claims of Pool Participants. Namely, it was anticipated that
Pool Participants would be willing to relieve the County of
their remaining Pool-Related Claims (approximately $850 million)
and have those claims become recourse only against third party
litigation recoveries. Were this assumption not correct, the
County was prepared to argue that further invasions of Pool
Participants' assets and/or tax revenues would be required to
enable the County to pay all of its obligations under the Plan
of Adjustment. The next level of asset and/or tax diversion
would have been at the expense of cities and special districts,
and the representatives of those constituencies on the OCIP
Committee were insistent on avoiding that possibility.
The concept of making the remaining Pool Participant Pool-
Related Claims non-recourse to the County, but recourse against
third party litigation recoveries, is incorporated into the
Joint Agreement. In addition to the concepts described above,
other related issues, and nonrelated issues of importance to
specific Pool Participant constituencies, are also addressed in
the Joint Agreement.
Of particular concern to Orange County cities is the
treatment of, and access to, Pool Participant interests in
certain County Administered Accounts ( "CAAs" ) . These are
accounts kept on the books and records of the County which hold
funds on behalf of Pool Participants, and sometimes the County,
for specific purposes. Under the CSA, the CAAs were deemed to
have suffered percentage losses in the Pools similar to the
losses deemed to have occurred to the deposit balances of
specific Pool Participant agencies. The remaining balances in
these County-administered accounts are, in many cases, owned in
part by Pool Participants. However, Pool Participants have not
20846332
December 27, 1995
Page 7
had access to these funds since the filing of the bankruptcy
case on December 6, 1994, and absent agreement with the County,
the County has no inclination to release these funds to Pool
Participants until the case is concluded, probably not earlier
than June of next year. In addition, certain CAAs have funds
which reflect unique interests of parties, like the Eminent
Domain account, and the treatment of these accounts in a manner
inconsistent with the treatment of other CAAs was also a matter
of great interest to the Committee. The Joint Agreement
requires the County to immediately distribute the cash balances
in numerous CAA' s to Pool Participants, to the extent of their
undisputed claims against those accounts. It further provides a
mechanism for recovering the deficiencies in those accounts.
The Joint Agreement also announces, as part of the
financial limitations of the County of Orange, the
discontinuation of the Arterial Highway Funding Program ( "AHFP" )
by the County of Orange. This program, previously in existence
for over 40 years, provided disbursement of approximately
$3. 5 million a year by the County of Orange to various Orange
County cities for the maintenance and improvement of certain
roads and highways. The program was administered by the Orange
County Transportation Authority. It is the intent of the County
to confirm with Pool Participants that the AHFP will be
discontinued. Pool Participants acknowledge in the Joint
Agreement the County's discontinuation of the program and agree
that the OCTA will not be obligated in the future to fund the
AHFP.
It was important to the OCIP Committee that third-party
litigation be conducted in an environment insulated from
political influences in County politics. The Committee has
agreed to accept Thomas W. Hayes as the representative entitled
to make all critical decisions relating to the litigation. The
Joint Agreement describes the scope of Mr. Hayes ' authority and
relationship to the County and the Committee.
The Option B Pool Participants expressed concerns that the
Joint Agreement not be inadvertently construed in a manner
adverse to the claims they hold under the CSA. In response,
specific language has been added to confirm that there are no
third-party beneficiaries to the agreement, nor is the agreement
intended to adversely affect the interests of third parties,
including Option B Pool Participants.
The Joint Agreement establishes a priority schedule for
disbursement of third-party litigation proceeds. Of note ,to
Pool Participants is the fact that Orange County schools receive
a priority in excess of $50 million from the first distributions
20846332
December 27, 1995
Page 8
of litigation proceeds available for Pool Participants. This
priority was granted to schools in response to the Committee's
interests in re-establishing the financial stability of the
school system, and to respond to the interest of the State
legislature to bring the schools into compliance with funding
requirements necessary to prevent state intervention.
The Joint Agreement provides for the establishment of a
five-person monitoring committee to ensure that the Plan of
Adjustment conforms to the provisions of the Joint Agreement, so
that the parties executing the Joint Agreement without the
benefit of the information normally available in the Plan of
Adjustment and/or Disclosure Statement, will be protected from
inadvertent mistake, manipulation or surprise. The Committee is
comprised of two representatives of the County, two
representatives of the Pool Committee (one of which must be a
cities representative) , and Mr. Hayes. This committee ceases
its function upon the confirmation of the County' s Plan of
Adjustment.
There are a number of other important provisions in the
Joint Agreement which apply to the interests of various Pool
Participants, and a careful reading of the Agreement is
required.
On Monday, December 18, the OCIP Committee considered the
final draft of the Joint Agreement and approved the agreement
with its support for distribution to Pool Participants as soon
as possible. It is hoped that each Pool Participant entity will
give this matter its earliest and fullest consideration and will
act on it as promptly as possible.
As with the CSA, the financial and legal representatives of
the Committee are available to you to answer your questions in
connection with your deliberations.
This Joint Agreement constitutes the next major step in the
case on behalf of Pool Participants. It has been closely
considered by the Committee and its professionals. While it is
not a completely attractive approach in that it does not assure
payment of the remaining claims of Pool Participants, it does
have some benefits which you might want to consider as part of
your deliberations, including the following:
1. The County undertakes not to seek any further
diversion of Pool Participants' assets or tax revenues in
connection with this case. This is of particular interest to
Orange County cities and special districts;
2046332
December 27, 1995
Page 9
2. With respect to entities having interests in CAAs,
those parties signing the Joint Agreement will have immediate
access to their account balances, while those not signing the
Joint Agreement may not have immediate access to those balances;
3. With respect to schools, there is a distribution
priority from litigation proceeds in excess of $50 million;
4. With respect to all Pool Participants, those signing
the Joint Agreement will avoid the possible appointment of a
State Trustee, and will receive the priority of distribution
of litigation proceeds set forth in the Agreement.
These considerations are benefits to which Pool
Participants would not be automatically entitled under a Plan of
Adjustment, or otherwise.
Ultimately, each entity needs to be prepared to weigh the
prospect of losing recourse status for its allowed claims
against the County in return for a different percentage of
litigation proceeds. This is a difficult analysis because it is
impossible at this point to know what the actual value of Pool
Participants ' remaining claims are against the County, because
we do not know the County's capacity to make payment on those
claims.
Likewise, it is impossible at this stage of the litigation
to be able to value the Merrill Lynch, or recently filed Peat
Marwick, litigation. Those litigations could prove to be very
valuable. On the other hand, they could be defeated in their
entirety by technical defenses which have yet to be surfaced.
What can be said is that, as of this date, the County's
Second Amended Complaint has survived a motion to dismiss by
Merrill Lynch, and the comments of the Judge at the hearing on
the motion to dismiss were such that it does not appear that the
Complaint, or its principal component parts, are subject to
immediate dismissal on technical grounds. No responsive
pleadings have yet been filed in the Peat Marwick litigation.
There is likely to be other litigations filed by the County
against brokers and professionals relating to pre-bankruptcy
actions.
2 Under the recovery legislation enacted in October of this
year, a State Trustee could, under certain conditions, be
appointed by the Governor for the County and for any Pool
Participant to facilitate the Plan of Adjustment.
20846332
December 27 , 1995
Page 10
The Orange County bankruptcy case is moving into its final
stage with the submission and confirmation of a Plan of
Adjustment. The County filed its Plan of Adjustment on
Thursday, December 21. The bankruptcy court extended the time
for the County to file its Disclosure Statement, which is the
narrative description of the Plan of Adjustment with related
projections and financial material, until January 19, 1996 . It
is the intent of the County to obtain confirmation of the Plan
of Adjustment by May of 1996.
If the Joint Agreement is approved by overwhelming numbers
of Option A Pool Participants, and the Plan of Adjustment is
confirmed incorporating the material elements of the Joint
Agreement, the County will likely emerge from this bankruptcy
case by the summer of 1996. Thereafter, third party litigation
will be prosecuted by the Representative on behalf of the County
and Pool Participants.
This case continues to be a monumental effort on the part
of the OCIP Committee. The members of the Committee have placed
the collective interests of the community above their own, and
have established a disciplined and successful course and
direction for Pool Participants as a united constituency. This
Joint Agreement is being presented to you as the next step in
the bankruptcy process and it has been approved unanimously by
the OCIP Committee.
If you have any questions, or would like to have a further
presentation by the financial or legal professionals of the
Committee, please telephone me as soon as possible. If your
municipal entity supports the Joint Agreement, an appropriately
executed signature page must be returned to Price Waterhouse
LLP, attention Bernar Burke, 575 Anton Boulevard, Suite 1100,
Costa Mesa, CA 92626 .
Thank you for your continued courtesies and support in this
case.
Very sincerely,
Patribk-C. Shea
PCs/wpc
CC: Official Committee of Pool Participants and Counsel
20846332
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
of
JOINT AGREEMENT OF THE COUNTY OF ORANGE,
THE OFFICIAL INVESTMENT POOL PARTICIPANTS' COMMITTEE,
AND EACH OPTION A POOL PARTICIPANT
FOR RESOLUTION OF CLAIMS AGAINST THE COUNTY OF ORANGE
(THE "JOINT AGREEMENT")
THIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY IS BEING PROVIDED TO YOU FOR
YOUR CONVENIENCE ONLY, AND IS NOT INTENDED TO BE, AND
SHOULD NOT BE, RELIED UPON BY YOU IN DETERMINING
WHETHER TO ENTER INTO THE JOINT AGREEMENT. YOU SHOULD
CAREFULLY REVIEW THE JOINT AGREEMENT IN ITS ENTIRETY
WITH YOUR COUNSEL AND OTHER PROFESSIONALS. THIS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO THE JOINT AGREEMENT. IN THE EVENT OF ANY
INCONSISTENCY BETWEEN THE JOINT AGREEMENT AND THIS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY, THE TERMS OF THE JOINT AGREEMENT
SHALL CONTROL.
THE JOINT AGREEMENT WILL AFFECT THE RIGHTS OF ALL
OPTION A POOL PARTICIPANTS WHO SIGN THE JOINT AGREEMENT
AS THOSE RIGHTS CURRENTLY EXIST UNDER THE COMPREHENSIVE
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT RE ORANGE COUNTY INVESTMENT FOOLS
(THE 14CSA11) . IN MANY CASES, THAT EFFECT MAY BE
ADVERSE.
INTRODUCTION
In response to the voters' defeat of the Measure R
Sales Tax proposal, the County of Orange (the "County") has
engaged in the process of developing an alternative recovery plan
which relies, in part, upon the diversion of future tax revenues
from other local governmental entities within the County.
Included among those from which the County sought reappropriation
by the California State Legislature was the Orange County
Transportation Authority (the "OCTA") . In order to limit the
County's access to the assets and revenues of special districts
and cities, most of which suffered substantial losses as a result
of the collapse of the Orange County Investment Pools, the Orange
County Investment Pool Participants Committee (the "Pool
Committee") has negotiated the terms of the accompanying Joint
Agreement. _
Of particular note to Option A Pool Participants is
Paragraph 12 of the Joint Agreement in which the County agrees,
G\2006661F.MF
222195 '1-
p,
except for the recovery legislation that was passed in September
of 1995:
"not to request of the Legislature, nor otherwise
support if requested or approved by any entity other
than the County, the diversion of revenue allocated to
the undersigned Option A Pool Participant for the
purpose of financing the repayment of claims in the
County's debt adjustment case or the payment of claims
under the County's Plan of Adjustment. "
This provision is intended to make it politically difficult for
the County to seek, and to provide substantial moral suasion
against the County seeking, further diversions of revenues from
other local governmental entities within the County.However, this
provision does not seek to preclude the County from seeking such
reappropriations in response to natural disasters or other cir-
cumstances beyond the payment of claims against the County in
connection with its bankruptcy proceeding.
The Joint Agreement may, in some cases, improve the
status of the remaining outstanding claims of an Option A Pool
Participant which signs the Joint Agreement (a "Participating
option A Pool Participant") ; and, in other cases, it may worsen
it. Each Option A Pool Participant should consider carefully the
impact of the Joint Agreement upon its rights under the CSA and
applicable law and the potential benefits to be derived by such
Pool Participant from the provisions of the Joint Agreement.
CONSENSUS LEGIBLATION
In accordance with the Joint Agreement, the California
State Legislature passed on September 15, 1995, and Governor
Wilson subsequently signed into law, several bills which will,
upon becoming effective:
1. Reallocate to the County $38 million of
sales tax revenue currently allocated to the OCTA or
the Orange County Transit District for a period of 15
years beginning July 1, 1996;
2. Reallocate to the OCTA $23 million of
the County's yearly apportionment of motor Vehicle Fuel
Taxes for a 16 year period beginning July 1, 1997; -
3. Reallocate to the County $4 million of
property taxes per year for a period of 20 years (plus
G\Z0066639.XR9
122195 -2
4
increments in such taxes in (a) and (b) below)
beginning July 1, 1996 from each of:
(a) the County Harbors, Beaches and
Parks Fund;
(b) the County Flood Control Fund; and
(c) the County Development Agency.
The effect of this legislation will be to divert $15 million per
year for 15 years (a total of $225 million) from the OCTA to the
County, along with $12 million per year for 20 years ($240
million in total) from County-controlled agencies to the County
to fund the issuance of new municipal debt. The proceeds of the
new debt issue will be used to pay off the County's pre-
bankruptcy note holders and certain other creditors.
Such legislation is to take effect only if a Plan of
Adjustment for the County consistent with the Joint Agreement is
confirmed in the County's bankruptcy or upon the appointment of
a trustee for the County by the Governor as described in the last
paragraph of this Executive Summary. Under the recovery legis-
lation, all revenues received by the County pursuant to such
legislation must be used for the performance of the County's
obligations under its Plan of Adjustment. If any of the diver-
sions from Flood Control, Harbors, Beaches and Parks, or the
Redevelopment Agency are successfully challenged, the County is
required to make up the shortfall from the County general
account.
TERMS OF THE PLAN OF ADJUSTMENT
The Joint Agreement requires the County to prepare and
file as soon as possible, and by no later than January 1, 1996,
a Plan of Adjustment which contains, in substance, the terms and
conditions specified in the Joint Agreement. Under the Joint
Agreement, participating Option A Pool Participants waive all
rights to object to, and agree to accept, any County Plan of
Adjustment which contains provisions incorporating the material
terms in the Joint Agreement. Importantly, under the Joint
Agreement, the County's Plan may provide for payment in full of
the allowed claims of all County vendors, employees and short
term note debt. It also permits the County to restore up to $15
million in reserve for County Certificates of Participation which
have previously been depleted.
Under the CSA, Settlement Secured Claims are "allowed
general unsecured claims against the County. " Repayment Claims
9�2099WF.N]
122195 -3
are defined under the CSA as "allowed . . . claims" against the
County as well, but the holder of a Repayment Claim
"shall not be entitled to receive . any payment
. . . from the County (other than from the
proceeds of the litigation of Pool-Related Claims (as
defined in the CSA) against third parties) until after
the payment in full of all Senior Claims against the
County and the payment in full of all interest on such
Senior Claims which accrues or matures after the County
Petition Date . . . ."
The "Senior Claims" to which Repayment Claims are subordinated
under the CSA include the vendor and employee claims and the
short term notes which may be paid in full under the County's
Plan pursuant to the Joint Agreement, the $275 million in
Recovery Bonds issued by the County, the proceeds of which were
paid to Option A Pool Participants in June of this year, and
Option A Pool Participants' Settlement Secured Claims. Under the
CSA, the County may also restore a portion of the losses suffered
by County Administered Accounts in advance of making any payment
on Repayment Claims other than from the proceeds of the Pool-
Related Claim litigation.
Under the Joint Agreement, both Settlement Secured
Claims and Repayment Claims would become non-recourse claims.
This means that they would no longer be debts for which the
County would be responsible. Rather, holders of Settlement
Secured Claims and Repayment Claims could look only to the
proceeds of third-party litigation of Pool-Related Claims and to
the $50 million litigation fund to be set up under the Joint
Agreement to prosecute those claims.
A five member Orange county Recovery Committee ("OCRA")
is to be appointed to evaluate the County's Plan of Adjustment
for consistency with the Joint Agreement and the CSA. Its
members will be Mr. Hayes, two individuals appointed by the
County and two individuals appointed by the Pool Committee, one
of whom is to be a city representative. The OCRA would be
disbanded once the County's Plan of Adjustment is confirmed.
POOL-RELATED CLAIMS LITIGATION
The County's Plan must also provide for the appointment
of a Representative under Section 112 3 (b) (3) (B) of the Bankruptcy
Code to "enforce, prosecute and collect upon" all of the County's
and Option A Pool Participants' Pool-Related Claims against the
brokerage houses, banks and professionals which are, at least in
part, responsible for the losses in the Orange County Investment
Pools. The Representative is required to keep the Pool Committee
and its counsel informed concerning the progress of such litiga-
6\Z006663LNAF
122195 -4-
tion, including in the manner specified in Exhibit 6 to the CSA.
However, the Representative would have
"the sole and absolute discretion in all matters
concerning the prosecution, collection, settlement and
compromise of Pool-Related Claims subject only to such
jurisdiction as may be retained by the Bankruptcy Court
pursuant to the Plan of Adjustment."
Under the Joint Agreement, the Representative also has "sole and
absolute discretion" in determining what portions of the net
proceeds from the litigation of such claims are to be distributed
and when, although the legislation recently passed by the
California State Legislature requires that all interest earned
on the Litigation Fund be distributed annually. The
Representative will initially be Mr. Tom Hayes.
DISTRIBUTION OF LITIGATION PROCEEDS
Under the CSA net proceeds from Pool-Related Claims
litigation are to be distributed approximately 62% (rather than
65% had all Pool Participants elected Option A under the CSA) to
the holders of Settlement Secured Claims and approximately 38%
to the County until all Settlement Secured Claims are paid in
full (a total of $525,457,359) . Then, approximately 62% of the
net proceeds of such litigation are to be distributed to the
holders of Repayment Claims and approximately 38% to the County
until the Repayment Claims are paid in full (a total of an addi-
tional approximately $798,367,684) . Thereafter, the county is
entitled to retain all of the net proceeds of such litigation
until it has received at least $236.7 million.
Under the Joint Agreement, the first $54.7 million in
the net proceeds of such litigation would be paid to satisfy
Repayment Claims held by the Option A Pool Participants listed
on Exhibit 1 to the CSA (the "Schools") . The next $325 million
of the net proceeds of such Pool-Related Claim litigation would
be paid to the holders of Settlement Secured Claims to repay
those claims in full. This means that holders of Settlement
secured Claims would fare worse under the Joint Agreement until
approximately $144 million in net litigation proceeds have been
collected; then they would fare better until the Settlement
Secured Claims are paid in full.
After all Settlement Secured Claims are paid in full,
the next $202.8 million of net litigation proceeds would be
distributed solely to the County, $22 million of which may be
used by the County solely to settle the claims of the option B
Pool Participants. Thereafter, the next $713 million in net
litigation proceeds would be distributed 61.59% to the holders
of Repayment Claims and approximately 38.41% to the County.
6\2006663i.MF
122215 -5-
i
Accordingly, under the Joint Agreement, holders of Repayment
Claims, other than the Schools, would be in a worse position than
they would be under the CSA until such claims are paid in full.
After $1.295.5 billion in net litigation proceeds has been
collected, in order to restore a portion of the funds diverted
from the OCTA under the recovery legislation described above, the
OCTA would receive approximately 43% of the next $525 million in
net litigation proceeds and the County would retain the balance.
Thereafter, net litigation proceeds would be split between
Option A Pool Participants and the County 61.59%/38.41%.
Under the Joint Agreement any portion of the $50
million Litigation Fund which is not used in pursuing Pool-
Related Claims would also be available for distribution in
accordance with the scheme described above. No such fund is
established under the CSA.
Lastly, the Joint Agreement requires the County to
apply the first net litigation proceeds it receives under the
scheme described above to repay the claims of Option A Pool
Participants against certain enumerated County Administered
Accounts which the Pool Committee and the County have identified
as containing the funds of some Option A Pool Participants. No
such provision exists under the CSA.
TREATMENT OF CLAIMS AGAINST COUNTY ADMINISTERED ACCOUNTS
Promptly after execution and Bankruptcy Court approval
of the Joint Agreement, the County is required to distribute to
those Option A Pool Participants that sign the Joint Agreement,
to the extent they are lawfully entitled to such amounts under
applicable non-bankruptcy law and to the extent of any portion
of a claim therefor is not being disputed by the County, all
amounts which remain, after allocation of the Orange County
Investment Pool losses, and including both pre- and post-
petition interest earned on the cash balances therein, in 54
specified County Administered Accounts and such other accounts
as the Pool Committee and the County may jointly agree. In
return, Participating Option A Pool Participants agree not to
object to any other distributions from such accounts to those who
are legally entitled to those distributions. Under Paragraph
8(i) of the Joint Agreement, the County's Plan of Adjustment must
provide that
"all claims based upon . deficiencies in County
Administered Accounts resulting from . . . losses in
the Orange County Investment Pools . held by the
County will receive the same treatment" as such claims
held by Option A Pool Participants.
G\2GG6663F..F
122195 -6-
However, under the Joint Agreement, the Plan may provide for the
payment of such claims to Option A Pool Participants over a
period of 20 years without interest. The Joint Agreement calls
for all Participating Option A Pool Participants to also waive
any post-petition, post-confirmation and post-effective date
interest on their claims for recovery of the deficits in the
County Administered Accounts.
The County also waives its rights to interest on the
deficits in all County Administered Accounts and agrees that the
$13.4 million County Administered Account deficit claims of the
Schools with respect to 19 unapportioned tax accounts maintained
by the County shall be paid before the County's own claims.
Participating Non-School Option A Pool Participants would agree
to a similar time of payment priority for the schools.
MISCELLANEOUS CONTRACTUAL PROVISIONS
Participating Option A Pool Participants and the Pool
Committee agree to suspend and, upon Bankruptcy Court approval
of the County's Plan of Adjustment, to dismiss with prejudice all
appeals they have pending relating to the Bankruptcy Court's
Order of June 27, 1995 approving the County's compromise with its
short term note holders regarding the validity of their note debt
and approving the roll-over of that debt to June 30, 1996. It
is a condition to the effectiveness of the Joint Agreement, which
the County has the sole ability to waive, that the Orange County
Cities Subcommittee separately agree to do so as well.
The Joint Agreement also confirms the discontinuation
of the County's Arterial Highway Financing Program (the "AHMI) .
Under that program the County provided funding of over $3 million
per year, administered by the OCTA, for distribution to Orange
County cities for the repair and improvement of roads and high-
ways throughout the County. The parties to the Joint Agreement
specifically agree that the AHFP will not be funded in the future
by either the County or the OCTA.
There are also provisions in the Joint Agreement for
the accounts of the Schools subcommittee and the Orange County
Cities Subcommittee in the Professional Fee Reserve established
under the CSA to be replenished with a portion the Withheld
Proceeds ($2 million and $1.2 million, respectively) which would
otherwise be distributed under the CSA to Schools and option A
Orange County Cities.
The Joint Agreement would become effective only if:
a. signed by all Option A Pool Participants
(a condition which the County can waive) ; and
6\Z006663F.MI
322366 -7
b, the Joint Agreement is approved by the
Bankruptcy Court.
TREATMENT OF POOL PARTICIPANTS WHO DO NOT SIGN JOINT AGREEMHNT
Paragraph 20 of the Joint Agreement provides that there
are to be no third party beneficiaries of the Joint Agreement and
that the Joint Agreement is not intended to waive any claims
against or adversely affect the rights of any person or entity
which is not a party to the agreement. Other than that, the
Joint Agreement is silent as to the effect of the agreement upon
Option A Pool Participants which choose not to sign it or upon
Option B Pool Participants (which are not being asked to sign the
agreement) . This means that Option A Pool Participants holding
Settlement Secured Claims would not benefit from the County's
agreement to permit net proceeds from Pool-Related Claims
litigation to be applied first to such claims, nor would such
Pool Participants' Settlement Secured or Repayment Claims be
voluntarily made non-recourse or subordinated other than as
provided now in the CSA.
However, the bills passed by the State Legislature
include a mechanism for the appointment of a trustee by the
Governor if the County fails to file a Plan of Adjustment con-
sistent with the Joint Agreement by January 1, 1996 or if the
Governor determines that as of May 1, 1996 or at any time there-
after the County, the Committee of Unsecured Creditors and the
Pool Committee "have failed to reach substantial agreement on the
terms of a plan of adjustment and the timely confirmation of the
plan appears unlikely. " The trustee would have not only all of
the powers of the Board of Supervisors, but also, "solely to the
extent necessary to prevent denial of confirmation of the plan
of adjustment " the following powers, among others, of Non-
County Pool Participants which are governmental entities:
a. to vote to accept or reject the Plan of
Adjustment; and
b. to subordinate or otherwise restructure
Pool Participants' claims against the County which are
based upon investment losses in the Pools.
In other words, if a trustee is appointed for the County, that
trustee could, but would not be required to, agree to the treat-
ment of a Pool Participant's claims against the County in the
manner specified in the Joint Agreement or in a manner which is
better or worse than that specified in the Joint Agreement. The
only constraint upon the trustee in exercising such powers on
behalf of Pool Participants is that he "not act in a manner
inconsistent with the fair treatment of any [such Pool
Participants) . "
6%2006663F.W
122195 -8-
g The News Pipeline
p County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
"Protecting the Public Health and Environment Through Excellence in Wastewater Systems"
Volume 3 No.1 January 17 1996
Ken Ramey, Rich Randall and Districts Implement New
Dennis Canavan to Retire Tuition Assistance Program
_ The Districts has
implemented a new policy
that will provide payment
of tuition and fees for
employees wishing to
pursue their educational
goals. The Districts will
reimburse employees
Ken Ramey Rich Randall Dennis Canavan who successfully
complete career
Ken Ramey (Maintenance), Rich Randall development courses.
(Operations) and Dennis Canavan (Operations) These can include technical classes, college-level
have announced their retirement from the Districts. courses or other studies that are directly job-related
A going-away party was held for Rich and Dennis and serve the goals and mission of the agency.
on Jan. 11 at the Plant No. 1 Control Center Copies of the new Tuition Assistance Policy were
auditorium. Unfortunately, Rich couldn't make it distributed to all employees on Jan. 9.
because he suffered a broken hip in Texas last Employees who want to participate in this
week and was hospitalized following hip surgery. program should discuss their educational goals
Ken's retirement party was on Jan. 16 in the with their supervisor and follow the procedures
Building 6 lunchroom at Plant No.1 outlined in the policy. Please call Training Manager
Ken told The News Pipeline that the 31 years he Linda Eisman, ext. 2104, for further assistance.
spent with the Districts went by quickly. He said, "I
want to urge all employees to take advantage of
the deferred compensation benefit package the Human Resources Survey Results
agency offers," and added, "get into it as deep as
you can. It's one hell of a good benefit. In fact, all Mike Peterman, Human Resources Supervisor,
the benefits here are as good as they gall" Ken is has announced that the responses to the Human
retiring in Missouri where he plans to do a lot of Resources Survey conducted last November have
fishing and hunting. been tallied, and that a synopsis of the results will
Dennis commented that during his 24 years be sent out in a memo to all employees shortly.
with the agency, "he's seen a lot of changes both The survey shows that HR was given its best
in the wastewater industry and at the Districts,"and marks for its commitment to training, benefit
added, "in order to be effective during times of administration and support functions. Areas
change, you have to be flexible" mentioned as needing improvement were in
From his hospital bed, Rich said last week that compensation and salary administration, and
he's planning on moving to Kingwood, Texas, for performance management.
awhile and then will do some traveling around the The items that received the most mention were
country before he and his wife decide where they'll HR's consistency in the application of policy, the
retire permanently. Rich said, "I've enjoyed working promotional process, benefits, and confidentially.
here for these past 21 years and the wastewater Mike said that HR is committed to improvement
industry has been very good to me." We all wish throughout its organization, and welcomes any
Rich a quick and speedy recovery and a happy comments or suggestions. You can reach Mike at
retirement. ext. 2105.
1
Performance Management property, and they will not be permitted to conduct
System Committee Meets with business if found in violation of this policy.
}� The key components of the policy are:
Management Employees • A description of specific prohibited conduct and
The Performance Management System categories of drivers subject to this program
Committee met with professional, supervisory and • Circumstances and procedures for alcohol and/or
management employees on Jan. 3 to discuss a controlled substance testing
working draft of the recommended performance • Consequences for violations of this program
management system. The committee wanted to • Information about the effects of alcohol and
receive input from as many of the 160 employees controlled substances
covered by the management performance • Intervention
management system as possible before it makes its The Safety and Emergency Response Division
final presentation to Executive Management on Jan. anticipates full implementation by the end of
22. Many important issues were discussed, and February. If you have any questions or want
some very useful comments and recommendations additional information, please call Dan Tunnicliff,
were made about the proposed system. ext. 2143, or Terri Josway, ext. 2140.
In a few situations, "straw-polls" were taken to
assess consensus on several issues. One in New Training Supervisor
particular was what are the "Performance Factors" The Districts welcomes Isiah Mitchell, Training
that should be included. Performance factors are Supervisor, Human Resources Office. Isiah spent 25
such things as Organization and Resource years with the Department of Justice and the
Maintenance, Technical Competence, Safety, Department of Defense before joining the Districts.
Communication Skills and Interpersonal Previously he was Training Director for the
Effectiveness. At the end of the meeting, employees Department of Immigration and Naturalization in
were asked to contact a member of the committee by Laguna Niguel and coordinated training for over
Jan. 10 if they had additional comments or 9,000 personnel in the western states. He also
recommendations. worked for the Department of the Navy as an
On Jan. 10, the committee met to incorporate Education Specialist.
some of the comments and prepare its final Isiah holds a Bachelor of Arts Degree in
recommendation to Executive Management. All Communication and a Masters Degree in
affected employees will receive a copy of this Educational Leadership from the University of West
document. Please contact Dawn McKinley, ext. Florida. He is also an avid golfer and computer
2108, or another member of the committee, if you enthusiast.
have any questions or additional comments.
New Controlled Substance and Blake Anderson Named to NRC
Alcohol Use Testing Policy Watershed Committee
Effective J 1lith less Assistant General
a°P� an. , employers w than 50 employees performing safety- Manager for Operations
Blake Anderson has been
sensitive activities (by DOT definition — named to a new 13-member
job activities requiring the use of a Class - -- Watershed Management
A or Class B commercial drivers license) Committee formed by the
are required to have a policy governing the misuse of 4National Research Council
alcohol or the use of controlled substances. The (NRC). The committee will evaluate and report on the
purpose of the requirement is to help prevent various watershed management efforts now taking
accidents and injuries resulting from the misuse of place in the U.S. and recommend an approach for
alcohol or the use of controlled substances. The future efforts. The effort is expected to take between
policy applies to all employees and contractors 18 and 24 months to complete. Three case studies
performing safety-sensitive activities when they are will be used by the committee to develop its findings.
on Districts' property or when they are conducting The term "watershed management" is loosely
any Districts-related business. Compliance with this applied to a wide range of planning and
policy also applies to off-site lunch periods and administrative efforts that are being implemented at
breaks when these employees or contractors are the local level to solve regional water quality
scheduled to return to work.Visitors and vendors are problems. The goal is to find site-specific solutions to
also governed by this policy while on Districts' ongoing environmental, resource and development
problems contained within a particular river basin or
drainage area. It is a method of reconciling the
2
conflict of purposes that often arises when trying to The move is necessary because the Human
address water supply, water quality, flood control, Resources staff has outgrown the existing space.
natural habitat, economic growth, recreation, and There is also a need for confidentiality when dealing
other issues. It replaces federally mandated"one size with certain Human Resources issues that the
fits all' solutions with locally developed solutions. existing complex cannot provide. Relocating to an
Blake served from 1920 to 1993 on the NRC area closer to the Administration Building is also a big
Committee on Managing Wastewater in Coastal plus.
Urban Areas, which produced a 400-page report by The PDC Committee recommendation is going to
the same title. The report received national and the Executive Committee this evening and then to the
international attention, and has been translated into Joint Boards on Jan. 24.
several foreign languages. It is also being used as an
academic textbook and as a public policy reference Can We Talk?
book.
Most importantly, the report's recommendations (and plan and do great things?)
helped form the basis on which San Diego received Have you seen that small
a she-specific ocean discharge permit issued by EPA army of clipboard-toting, button
in accordance with Section 301(h) of the federal wearing employees (a.k.a.
Clean Water Act. r members of the
r Communications Division)
AMSA Winter Conference walking around the plants?
The Association of Metropolitan Sewerage They're on a mission...to find
Agencies (AMSA) will be holding its 1996 Winter r out what's on your mind
Technical Conference Feb. 6 through Feb. 9 in Santa communications-wise. Attached
Fe, N.M. The conference will examine wet-weather- to their clipboards are surveys we'd like you to
related issues and highlight integrated watershed complete. Please take a moment to do so. It's
management as the most efficient means for important, especially if we're going to have an
addressing what is considered the last significant employee communications plan that meets your
source of water quality impairment nationwide. needs.
The conference will focus on the control of urban Concurrent with our fact-finding mission is the
wet-weather impacts from stormwater,sanitary sewer formation of the Communications Action Team
overflows (SSOs) and combined sewer overflows (CAT, for short). CAT members will play a major
(CSOs). The sessions will highlight current efforts by role in refining our employee communications plan.
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), For example, we'll use the survey results as a
states and local governments to control wet weather springboard for new programs and as a way to
impacts, as well as on the drive by the EPA and measure the effectiveness of existing programs,
stakeholder groups to establish a national wet- like The News Pipeline and the NEWSline.
weather policy based on the framework of To make the Communications Action Team a
comprehensive watershed management. success, we really want — and need —
Wet-weather flows are of particular interest to the representatives from both plants. The more CAT
Districts. Just over a year ago, we reached all time members, the merrier! Several employees have
peak flows of 550 million gallons per day during a already signed up as team members. If you'd like
series of storms in early January. Our new Strategic
Plan includes an Inflow and Infiltration (181) Study to to get on the team, please call Michelle Tuchman,
determine the sources of these additional flows and ext 2050. FYI: Our first meeting will be in February.
find ways to keep excess water out of the system. We'll aftemate meeting sites between Plants No.t
and 2.
Old Lab Slated to Become New
Human Resources Office Announcements
After working in temporary trailers for more than e Old Guard Shack Demolished
eight years, the Human Resources staff may be If you get that feeling that something's different
getting new quarters. as you drive through the main entrance at Plant
At their Jan. 4 meeting,the Planning, Design and No. 1, you're right! The guard shack built in 1988
Construction (PDC) Committee approved plans has been tom down to alleviate a hazardous traffic
recommended by the Ad Hoc Committee Regarding situation. Future changes at the main entrance will
Office Space to renovate the old laboratory building make the Future
more visitor-friend) including new
and turn it into the new Human Resources Office. P y� 9
The renovation will provide several enclosed offices, directional signs and a "monument" sign like the
a conference room, a separate reception area and a one at Plant No. 2
large open space that can be divided into cubicles.
3
Second Annual Group Ski Trip *Promotions*
ear The Employee Activity Congratulations to the following employees who
1w( Committee is holding their second were promoted since late December, and a belated
annual group ski event this year on r Bear Mountain.eservations, call congratulations to the following employees we
To make your r
Friday, Jan. 26, inadvertently missed congratulating last November!
�
John Dettle, ext. 5069, and pay Danny Evangelista
your$24 before Jan. 19. From: Sr. Accounting Clerk 2220
Although this hasn't been the To: Financial Analyst 2220
best year for natural snow in the Cesar Sandulescu
local mountains, the conditions have been good for From: Engineering Aide III 3790
man-made snow in most areas. Long-range forecasts To: Engineering Associate 3790
also call for a good possibility of new snow by the Charles Lee
end of the month. From: Sr. Const. Inspector 3790
e Terri Josway is Guest Speaker To: Supvng. Const. Inspector 3790
at Women's Career Conference Rose Marsella (Transfer)
Safety and Emergency Response Manager Terri From: Senior Clerk 2230
Josway spoke on careers in the field of worker To: Senior Clerk 3550
health and safety to over 100 junior and senior high Mike Arevalos
school women on Jan. 11 at Fullerton College. The From: Coll. Fac. Worker II 3340
conference was sponsored by the American To: Sr. Coll. Fac. Worker 3340
Association of University Women and called Bridges Dennis Smith
to Tomorrow: Careers in Math and Science. From: Coll. Fac. Worker II 3340
Cost Savings Realized on To: Sr. Coll. Fac. Worker 3340
Natural Gas Purchases
Switching our supplier of natural gas has saved *New Employees*
the Districts $38,682 in the first three months of the The following individuals have joined the agency
contract from August through October of 1995. Since late December. Welcome to the Districts!
Amoco Energy Trading Corporation now supplies * Cymantha Atkinson — Finance
all the natural gas used in the Central Power Sr. Financial Analyst
Generation facilities. We had previously purchased Donald Cleveland — Maintenance
natural gas from the Southern California Gas
Company Collection Facilities Worker I
The savings were realized due to the efforts of • Brian Reed — Maintenance
Operations and Purchasing staff members Rob Collection Facilities Worker I
Thompson, Farirai Dube, Katherine Yarosh and a Ronald Dewitt—Warehouse
Lynda Heller. They worked many hours developing Storeskeeper Assistant
purchase spec cations for the bidding process. The a Isiah Mitchell—Human Resources
Districts still purchase small quantities of natural gas Training Supervisor
for heating and water heater use from Southern • Brad Cagle— Finance
California Gas. Principal Financial Analyst
The Operations Department is now looking to • Vaughan Hargrave—Human Resources
form a coalition with the Orange County Water Safety Trainer Consultant
District, the Irvine Ranch Water District, and the El
Toro Water District to get additional discounts for our
miscellaneous natural gas uses.
0 Service Awards 4 The News Pipeline
The following employees celebrated their The News Pipeline is published every
service anniversaries during the last two pay payday by the Communications Division for the
periods. Congratulations! employees and Directors of the Orange County
Twenty-Five Years Sanitation Districts.The deadline for submitting news
Ron Parker Plant No. 2 Inspection hems is the Wednesday before payday.
Ten Years Contributions are welcome!
John Mellin Operations
Richard McKusick Operations Editor..........................Patrick McNally (x2056)
Five Years Associate Editor........Corinne Berenson (x2055)
Lee Lindel Laboratory
4
JOINT CHAIRMAN'S REPORT
JOINT BOARD MEETING OF
JANUARY 24, 1996
1 . 1 WANT TO ALERT YOU THAT THERE MAY BE A NEED
TO CALL SPECIAL JOINT BOARDS MEETINGS IN
FEBRUARY TO DISCUSS LANDFILL ACQUISITION
ISSUES AND THE ORANGE COUNTY INVESTORS POOL
AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY OF ORANGE. WE
ARE LOOKING AT FEBRUARY 14TH AS THE TIME TO
DECIDE ON LANDFILLS AND THE JOINT AGREEMENT
RE THE BANKRUPTCY.
2. THIS SATURDAY, JANUARY 27, BETWEEN 9 AND NOON,
IS THE DIRECTORS' WORKSHOP TO REVIEW
ALTERNATIVES AND DETERMINE POLICY AND
DIRECTOR FOR THE NEW STRATEGIC PLAN.
1
IF WE ARE TO REALIZE MAXIMUM BENEFIT FROM THE
THIS STRATEGIC PLAN, IT IS CRITICAL THAT ALL
BOARD MEMBERS PLAN ON ATTENDING EACH OF
THESE WORKSHOPS.
AN AGENDA FOR THAT MEETING WAS INCLUDED WITH
YOUR AGENDA PACKAGE.
3. AT LAST WEEK'S CASA MEETING IN PALM SPRINGS,
FIVE MEMBERS OF THE DISTRICTS' STAFF MADE
PRESENTATION ON SUBJECTS RANGING FROM
PITFALLS OF PRIVATIZATION TO "WHAT IT MEANS TO
BE BUSINESS FRIENDLY." ALL OF THE
PRESENTATIONS WERE WELL RECEIVED AND STAFF
DID AN EXCELLENT JOB. THANKS TO:
BOB OOTEN
MAHEEN TA-LAY-BEE
2
ADRIANA RENISCUE
MIKE MOORE AND
IRWIN HAYDOCK.
4. MEETINGS SCHEDULED BETWEEN NOW AND THE
NEXT JOINT BOARDS MEETING ARE:
A. THE AD HOC COMMITTEE RE LANDFILL ISSUES IS
MEETING AT 5:30 P.M. ON JANUARY 31ST.
B. THE PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION
COMMITTEE MEETING IS FEBRUARY 1ST AT 5:30
P.M.
C. THE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND
TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE WILL BE
MEETING FEBRUARY 7TH AT 5:30 P.M.
3
D. THE FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN
RESOURCES COMMITTEE WILL MEET ON
WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 14TH AT 5:30 P.M.,
BEFORE THE TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED 7:30
P.M. SPECIAL JOINT BOARDS MEETING.
E. THE NEXT MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE
COMMITTEE IS SET FOR WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY
21 ST AT 5:30 P.M.
F. AND THE NEXT REGULAR JOINT BOARDS
MEETING IS SET FOR FEBRUARY 28TH.
a
MEETING DATE: January 24. 1996 Tua . 7,30 P.M. DISTRICTS: 1.2.3.5.6.7.11.13 & 14
DISTRICT 1 JOINT BOARDS
(MORENO) . .......... MC GUIGfJI ........ WRRYI ............. BOWMAN .........
(SSRRYIISCHAFTRI . .. . . fTRW1YAIY........ �yy7y WASTINGSI........... SROWN ........... _
(COONM . ......... . WRWY .......... (SCOM ............. COLLINS ..........
WOTTSI .......... SALTAREW ........ IDEBAYI ............. COX .............
(STEINERI ........... STANTON ....... ICOX) ............... DESAY ...........
IBELU ............... DENES ...........
IMUER) ............. 01 T 0IT .........
DISMICT2 IPAWERI ............ OUNLAP ........
15WTD ............ COLLINS ....... IDOWNEYI...... ...... ECKENRWE .......
CH —_
IOULWSON)......... 4ASLiY ........... I W--"(SARRI ...... SMINONM I ........
WLU .............. DENES ............ (ANDERSONI -......... ROM ...........
IPARKERI ........... DIINLAP. . ......... (MARSHAW .......... ORRTW ........... —
"MEYI .......... ECKENRODE ........ WELCH) ............. GULLIXSON ........ —_
IANDERSONI ......... ROM ............ MARDI ............. HAMMOND ........
IMORENOI........... MCGUIGAN ........ IMUERI ............. LEIRIG ........... —
IWONRI ........... WARN .......... IMWERI ............. MM ............. —
IMNKHEAW ......... SSIfN............ IMORENOI ............ MC GUIGAN........RI.AKETI............ SINGER ........... ICOONRI ............ MURPHY ..........
(SIEWER) ........... STANTON ......... ISANKHEADI .......... NSYU ........... —
MALY) ............. 7EMEL ............ Ire IEVAN51 ............. RICE .............
IPOTTSI ............. MLTAREW........
DISTRICTS (DOTSON) ............ SAPIEN ...........
IDOTSONI ........... SAM ........... ✓ (ZLAKETI............. SINGER ...........
IPARKERI ........... DUNIAP........... Wr STEWERI............. STANTON .......
KERRY) ............ BOWMAN.......... MTANTOM ........... STEINER ..........
WASTINGSI.......... BROWN ........... (MILLERI ............. SWAN ............ —_
15COTT1 ............ COLLINS .......... IWAHLSTROMI ........ SYLVIA ........... _
IANDFASOM ......... ROM ............ � IGUUMSONI .......... MR!!BN ........... _
IMARSHAW ......... Ii11B'F1H ........... .a6e (DAILY) .............. ZEMEL ...........
("US) .......... LEIPLIO ........... —
(MINER) ............ LdN .............(MORENO) ........... MCOUIOAN ........ STAFF OTHMS
1BANKHEA01 .........MdIFC............ ANDERSON . ✓ WOODRUFF ..
IWANS)............ RICE ........... >>> OMY ..... ANDRUS ....
RLAKETI............ SINGER ......... HODGESMSENS AS DEMIR .....
ISIEINFAI ... ....-. BTANTON ....... HODGES ... LR ........
MAHLSTROWQ ....... SYLVIA ......... HOVEY
WALYI ............. ZEYEL ........... JIXiK ..... NIXON......�
KYIE ..... SMW......y
DISTRICTS LWDFfl .... L
ICOXI .............. DERAY............ . WDWIN ... /�::JG
ISTANTONI ........ S1FNB CWTYIIE 1........... I M ..
WEMY) ............ COX ............. MCNELLY .. ..........
OOTEN .... ........
DISTRICTS STREW .. ........
IK" ISCH
(COXI ............... ......... TUCHMAN ........ _
ICO%I .............. DDIAY............ WILSON Y ..
(STANTON) .......... SIEBBI........... WILSOR ..
WWSOfl ... .. . .... . . .
DISTRICT 7
WARD) ............ MAMMOIDI......... � 1 ,�P�tyl/. "- '
IPOTISI CHAFE....... 811LTAIMLLI ........ `G�W'^
IWX) .............. DESAY............
IPESS10G) ........... ®BYYW.........
IMORENOI ........... MCOUIGAN ........
NT ......... . N WA URPNY ..........
ISTNTONI .......... 81EWER
DIST111CT tt
IMUERI ............ IEIPZIG ..R ............
(STEINER) ........... STANTON .........
DISTRICT 13
(DALCHI ............
(DLY) ............. ZEMELPARKJEI ..........-. � �
IWONTI ........... OUNLAP..........-
ZI ........... M jSTAW URPHY ..........
(STAWROM .......... STEWEII...........
DISTRICT 14
IPOTTSI ............ SALTAlLW ..-..... _
(CDONTZI ...........
MURPHV ...
MARDI ............ NAMMOND.........
ISTAMOW .......... STEINER........... J'AWPOOCU TIREC DHML102A
WILLEM ............ 9WAN ............ 01/24196
01/24/96 -JOINT BOARD MINUTES
#4 - Receive and File Minute Excerots
JC: Moving on to item#4 which is the Supplemental Agenda Item, the yellow sheet in
your folder packet. We have had a lot of changes in Directors and what we need is a
motion approving the changes here. Any opposition? Consider that unanimous.
#6 f a, - Report of Joint Chair
JC: Reminder that there may need to be another Joint Boards Meeting in February to
discuss landfill acquisition. This subject is still under discussion. We are going to talk a
little bit about it briefly, but I just want to give you a heads up on that issue. The Orange
County Investment Pool Agreement with the County of Orange may also be an agenda
item which we may need to have a meeting for and we are looking at February 14 as
the possible date to have that discussion, but we'll be letting you know.
Another reminder- you've been briefed on this a number of times, but this Saturday
between 9:00 a.m. and noon is the special workshop for the review of alternatives to
determine our policy's for the Strategic Plan. We've invited all Directors to be here at
this meeting but in addition to that we've asked the business community and the
environmental community to be party to the discussions. We need to really get a
handle on this plan and we feel this is the way to do it, so it's critical that all Board
Members plan on attending these workshops. As we mentioned before, there is one
per quarter with the first one starting this Saturday at 9:00 a.m. right here at this
location. There should be an agenda for that meeting included in your packet that
you've received tonight.
Secondly, last weeks CASA Conference in Palm Springs -there were five members of
the district staff which made presentations. Some of you may recall that I too served as
Chairman of the Directors Committee on the CASA Board and so we had several of our
staff members speaking to Directors throughout the State on the issues of pitfalls of
privatization or what does it mean to be business friendly. Some of this was generated
out of the issues that started with excess capacity fees that we've had discussions on.
So we had quite an interesting discussion with other members throughout the State
about this issue. They were also talking about the positive impacts of reclaimed water
on the bay. You know Peer Swan introduced the subject and we decided it was worthy,
and that other people in the State needed to hear about it. But it was valuable because
Irwin Haydock from the Districts made that presentation. It really shared with all of us
the issues associated with the uses of water, whether it's rain water or sewage water or
whatever you want to call it, wastewater. It is part of our eco-system and it was helpful
to get a better understanding of how all of that works and Irwin Haydock did an excellent
job in discussing that. Mike Moore also was on hand to talk about some of the issues.
Bob Ooten talked about performance benchmark issues that are now becoming more
prevalent with agencies throughout the state. Mahin Talebi and Adriana Renescu
talked about what it means to be business friendly and shared with us the kinds of
programs that this District has in place to deal with businesses to assist them in
JAWPDOMBSNIN96WOTES.01 Page 1
understanding the wastewater disposal issue, source control and so forth. The program
was well received and I must say I was really proud of our staff. They did an excellent
job in the presentations. I understand that Michelle had a little something to do with that
too. Regarding the slide presentation, she has stepped in and given better guidance on
how we should make presentations using slides and they were very, very well prepared
and extremely well received by the committee members. I think Jan Debay was there
also.
I've encouraged all of you who can be present at these programs in the future to go to
CASA because it's an opportunity for us to become more involved in the statewide
issues and have influence on some of the legislative activities and policies that are
being developed statewide. Historically, this District has had a lot of its Board Members
involved in CASA. But, because of the turnover in Board Members we are having
fewer and fewer all the time, so it would be useful to encourage you again to try to
participate. As you may know and recall, Tom Woodruff currently serves as President
at CASA this year, so we have played a major role, historically, and continue to, but we
need more of you to participate in the future.
Jan do you have anything you'd like to add?
Jan Debay's comments could not be heard.
JC: The May meeting of CASA is going to focus on Operational Costs of the Districts
because while on one hand it's valuable to assist businesses out there, it's also valuable
to provide businesses with the most cost effective operating system for wastewater
disposal so that it doesn't burden them anymore than necessary. So, in May there will
be a discussion on that at CASA. Thanks. Jan.
Moving on to the meetings that are now scheduled; the Ad Hoc Committee on Landfill
Issues will meet next Wednesday the 31st at 5:30 p.m. The Planning, Design and
Construction Committee meets Thursday, February 1 at 5:30 p.m. The Operation,
Maintenance and Technical Services Committee will meet February 7 at 5:30 p.m. The
Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee will meet on Wednesday,
February 14 at 5:30 p.m. before the tentatively scheduled meeting we have for the Joint
Boards that same night. The next meeting of the Executive Committee is set for
Wednesday, February 21 at 5:30 p.m. I'll have a few more words to say about that later
in one of the agenda items. The next regular meeting of this Board will be Wednesday,
February 28 at 7:30 p.m.
That concludes my report. Don, did you have any items that you wanted to add?
#6(b) - Report of General Manager
DFM: Mr. Chairman, I don't have anything myself, but I've asked Blake . . .
Wally Linn: comments could not be heard.
JC: Thank you, Wally, we appreciate your comments.
J:\WPDOMBSUNMNOTES.01 Page 2
DFM: I've asked Blake to make a presentation.
BPA: Cannot hear
#6C - Report of General Counsel
TLW: Just one item. For District No. 3 there was a memo, a status report in the file
concerning the United Technologies case. For the general information for everyone,
that's the pipeline case that we took to trial and had the large award. There was a
notice of appeal filed and that is progressing forward. In order to be doubly sure that
we're being protected in case the worst happens on the appeal and we've got to go
back, the Districts made a determination to engage one of the experts we used,
Mr. Dean Jasper, and he comes down once a week and they are periodically grabbing
pieces of the pipe that is being removed. The District is replacing the old broken line
with a new line. That was a double barrel out there -we had two parallel pipes. We at
one time had initiated litigation against'AMOCO" the manufacturer of the second pipe,
but not having any failures, the pipe being a few years newer, we weren't sure of the
status and so Mr. Jasper was engaged to be available to make an analysis. This report
is dated January 24, it was actually done last night. I'm pleased to tell you, the decision
to hire Jasper was a good one, because the bad news is, we have indications that the
AMOCO pipe, which is currently the active pipe, may have a significant leak and in the
course of the excavation for the removal, they've run into some very unusual
contaminated sail conditions out there. We were just made aware of it midday today.
They haven't yet exposed it all, but we'll know in the next day or two. It was a nominal
cost to have Mr. Jasper come once a week, and he'll be able to tell us whether we've
got a problem with that second pipe. This will probably mean we can get the matter
resolved with AMOCO on a short order.
There is one item on Closed Session that we'll address at that time.
#7 - Minutes deemed approved
Stanton: abstained
#8 - Payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts
Roll Call Vote - motion carries.
9(a)(b) (c) -Consent Calendar
JC: Unanimous
#11(a) (1 -71
JC: Unanimous
11b 1
JC: There was an item that came before the Steering Committee and then on to the
Executive Committee for discussion dealing with whether we change the current
Committee system. There was a variety of discussion, some of it had to do with dealing
with staff, supporting three committees or whether we should reduce it to two. There
was a consensus by both the Steering Committee and the Executive Committee that we
JAWPDOCIBSWIIN96W0TES.01 Page 3
retain the current three meeting system. There was also discussion about how we deal
with the Executive Committee and as you see here it was on an as-needed basis.
Basically, what that means is that it will be needed at least through June because the
Executive Committee has been given the assignment, as you may recall to deal with the
consolidation subject. They have been discussing that over time and they will be
dealing with it again at the next meeting. Basically, what we're saying is that the
Executive Committee will continue on policy related issues, but one thing we would
change here is not running the Committee Reports through the Executive Committee
anymore. What that was creating was an extra workload for staff that just seemed to be
redundant in many ways because it came here. Starting in February, we will have the
Committee Chairs make reports to this full board about what took place so all board
members have a little better sense of what took place in the respective committee
meetings. Tonight, we're just asking you to affirm the decision made by the Steering
Committee and the Executive Committee. Motion for approval? Unanimous.
#11 lb) l2 - 51
JC: These are items that came before the Planning Committee. They reviewed these
again at the Planning Committee and the Executive Committee and unless there is an
item you'd like to pull for discussion or question, I'd like to entertain a motion for
approval of item#11 (b) (2, 3, 4 and 5). Discussion? Unanimous.
#11 lb) (6)
JC: This happens to do with Operations. They had one item before them that dealt
with Compressed Natural Gas Refueling Station. Motion? Discussion: could not be
heard. Unanimous.
#11 (b)(7 - 121
JC: These items came before the Finance Committee with discussion that these are
recommended by the Finance Committee for approval.
#11 (b) (9) - Murphy abstained
#11 (b) (11) - Gullixson opposed
Unanimous.
#12 - Benchmarking and Performance Measurement Update
DFM: Mr. Chairman, this was presented to the FAHR Committee but we felt it
sufficiently interesting and we wanted the whole Board to hear it. It's not an action item,
but it's an update on what we are doing in the area of Benchmarking and Performance
Measurement and so Judy is going to make a brief presentation with Greg Mathews and
Bob Ooten.
JAW: First of all I want to say that a critical goal for FY '96 certainly in the General
Managers performance evaluation this year is improving management performance.
Clearly, this is a critical goal every year. Particularly important in this fiscal year as we
try to change the organizational culture and make it more cost conscious and
J1WPDOMBSUN96WOTES.01 Page 4
competitive. We are going to do this by meeting our commitments we made to you at
the beginning of the fiscal year. We said that we would initiate benchmarking and
performance measurements in all departments and we told you that the 1996/97 budget
document would be goal driven and incorporate benchmarking data. In order to
accomplish all of this, tracking costs is critical to our success. This particular slide
shows the budget goal for FY '96 was $627 per mgd. We modified that goal
subsequent to the adoption of the budget to $599. The first quarter came in at
approximately$509 and at our February 2 budget meeting with the executive staff as
part of an off-site retreat, we're going to establish a very aggressive goal for 1997. It
will be below the $599 that we agreed to this year. We need to have a very disciplined
effort to get behind the numbers. We need to understand our costs better than we
have. This will allow us to analyze alternatives. We need to delete non-value added
work. Of course, one of the tools to accomplish this will be our new FIS system, but we
won't have that installed until mid FY'97, so we're not going to wait for that. We're
going to start our work program now. How do we begin? We're going to take a very
good look at our high cost areas and target our high growth areas. We also need to
figure out how we arrived at where we are today, We're reviewing 10-year cost growth
data to help formulate our work program. We're going to look very carefully at our past
history. Typically, in this industry I'm told, according to a recent AMSA Report, costs
have been increasing from 9% to 11% per year and doubling every eight years. While
that may be industry standard, I don't really take comfort in that. It's kind of like one fat
person looking at another fat person and saying, "hey, you look pretty good to me". I'm
not sure we want to just look at what's going on nationally in wastewater treatment. We
really need to look at best performance in a variety of areas to benchmark properly. I
think there are a lot of opportunities in doing this appropriately and properly with a lot of
effort on the part of the staff. For one thing, we feel if we really get lean and mean we
can compete effectively with the privatizers. We don't need to make a profit, we don't
pay taxes, what we have to do is work a lot more efficiently. We are assuming,
according to industry standards again, that a very good benchmarking performance
measurement program saves an average of 11% of operating costs within
approximately 3 years. I actually think we are going to do better than that.
I want to introduce Greg Mathews, our Principle Administrative Analyst, who is going to
show you an overview of the last 10 years of costs. It's going to be somewhat
revealing.
Greg Mathews: Report could not be heard.
Discussion by Leipzig and Debay could not be heard.
DFM: We wanted to share this with you because it gives you a flavor of where we are
heading as an organization. Peer has been kibitzing here about our cost mgd going up
and it has gone up some from the beginning of the first quarter, but by the time we get
through with our retreat next week, I think we are going to have a very aggressive
number in mind that we're going to be looking at. My feeling and what I'm telling the
staff is if we don't become competitive with privatizers, then there is no good reason
why we don't get privatized. But privatizers have to make a profit and privatizers have
JAWPDOMBSUNgSWOTES.01 Page 5
to pay taxes, and so that oughten be too hard to do. On the other hand, when your in
an organization and your trying to make dramatic changes which means your working
against inflation to make a real reduction that goes beyond just keeping pace with
inflation, it takes a lot of commitment from the entire organization and a lot of teamwork
and it is part of the shift in how you think about managing organizations
that we have to instill in all of our people. This is not a terribly difficult job, but it does
take a lot of time and a lot of commitment on the part of a lot of people, and that's where
were heading. Just so you know what our strategy is, we thought we'd share this with
you tonight.
Swan (?): I understand the benchmarking presentation up here that we saw, but lest we
all forget, if you look at the base unit of measurement for the District, which is cost per
million gallons treated, in the last 10 years we've increased the cost over 2 '1 times the
cost per million gallons treated. There are various different explanations but that's a
very significant change and I don't want you to feel like we've bought into this thing that
it's okay. I'm sure that everyone's going to try to drop it down. The first quarter we went
from roughly $508 mgd, the second quarter we were burning at $635 mgd roughly, so
we've averaged out around $570 per mgd treated here. We've got a ways to go.
JC: Any questions?
Question/comments could not be heard.
DFM: The Indianapolis program is a contract. It is still owned by the City of
Indianapolis, but they have a contract and bid against the city. Its only been two years
of operation so it's very early to tell what the longer term . Maybe
they are prepared to become very competitive and
become very marketing. . But we're not very
smart if we don't recognize what's happening in the industry. There are now 500
contracted operators around the country, mostly smaller obviously, but I think K we want
to be smart we better be aware of what's going on and move in that direction, or else we
become a target.
Barry Hammond: comments could not be heard.
DFM: One of the issues that we want to try to set before you at the Strategic Planning
Workshops is, in order to save money, how much more risk are you prepared to take?
risk any spills in the ocean and
how much redundancy do we really have to have for the system to be sure that there is
never a spill. Those are the strategic policy decisions that you all have to make if we're
going to make a real difference in eliminating or forestall major new capital projects that
were envisioned in the 2020 plan. That's why we're redoing it. I see an opportunity
perhaps to eliminate or forestall $100,000,000 to$200,000,000 of capital . If
I'm right, that's a major benefit to our constituents and maybe I'm not right because
maybe you all aren't prepared to make the kind of decision to make that happen. I'm
pretty sure that we can't continue to provide the kind of redundancies and conservative
JAWPDOMBSUN96WOTES.01 Page 6
management make this to be made. That's your decision, we
shouldn't be making it for you. That's why you need to participate in these workshops.
Swan (7): I don't think it's fair, to go through and say, hey, ff you economize your
system that you're risking a spill. No one here is applicating going into that situation. It
is very hard to do that in this kind of contained system anyway. But what were talking
about, and I think the people looking for efficiency want to see things run cheaper,
better, smarter, faster, where a very unautomated plant compared to some of the other
plants we need to be more efficient on that and I don't think in doing that, that we're
risking spills. We recently put a computer system in here, in fad, we put four computer
systems in - in a system that we found only needed one and we had three back-up
computers. Now that might just be a little overkill, it was before you came here and no
one's blaming anyone for it. But it is overkill and it was a very expensive deal.
BPA or Bob Oaten (7): I'd like to add one point, and I mentioned it earlier tonight and
some of the things that Operations has done. One of the great gains that occurred in
the Indianapolis experience was coming in with a highly trained operational staff who
was able to look across the treatment plant and see the obvious and quick methods for
improving the cost of operations. Changing the way some systems were being
operated, being able to shut off some systems that provide air to the treatment plant.
Those are the kind of things that we've been doing over the years and so, those
marginal improvements are something that any public agency ought to be aggressively
pursuing but beyond that there still are obvious areas that we're going to make
improvements to. And Jan and Vic, I can assure you that your staff is as strong
environmentalists as we are businessmen and women and whatever we bring to you
we'll take both of those points of view into consideration before we roll out anything
that's going to have a detrimental effect to either the environment or to the beaches of
this fine county.
JAW: If I could just add one more thing. When Greg began his presentation, he talked
about efficiency and effectiveness. We need to measure both, and in next years budget
we're going to develop performance measures that do that.
JC: Thank you Don, Judy, Greg, Bob. We appreciate the presentation and update and
we're looking forward to more information about those items. Lets move onto item#13.
#13 - Update on Proposed acquisition of County of Orange Integrated Waste
Management System.
JAW: Let me start by explaining that we've been working as a team to put together an
application to LAFCO designating a new county wide district for landfill in the event that
the Board chooses to go forward. We understand, we've had several meetings with
LAFCO on this, it's very clear that we can choose to withdraw our application at
anytime, not committing the Districts of doing anything by simply submitting an
application for the LAFCO process. An important understanding we've had with Dana
Smith, the Executive Director with LAFCO, is that our application is going to have to be
quite clear. What is our business plan for managing the landfil if we're planning to get
down to $12 a ton from $18 a ton, that the county numbers look like. We need to have
J1WPDOCIMMINSMOTES.01 Page 7
a business plan that explains how we plan to do that. It's clear to us, as we've gone
through some of the numbers that we've seen from county management, that in order to
get into a competitive cost, we are going to have to privatize rapidly. There is no other
choice, frankly. I've asked General Counsel to provide us with a written legal opinion on
the status of the MOU's for the various employees who currently work at the landfill.
We've been advised that case law does support that we could vacate those MOU's and
we could choose to bring any or none, or a few county employees over. The choice is
ours. They would have, of course, the right to representation, but we would be in a
position to determine the terms and conditions of their contract coming over. There is a
real option there, we're not stuck with labor contracts that were negotiated by the
county. The costsare quite huge frankly. We're really going to have to be very clear in
our application of what our intent is and we're preparing that application now and we
should have a pretty good draft by the end of February.
BPA: On the issues of valuation and our due diligence in that regard. The Landfill
Committee met last Wednesday and will meet again next Wednesday. Our
professionals, Price Waterhouse and Saybrook Capital have been building models
based on various assumptions on what the valuation of the system could be. I might
say that there is a considerable swing in the valuation depending upon the assumptions
that you use in looking toward the long term value of the system. The tipping right, the
amount of trash that is actually brought in for disposal, the operating costs, all those
things have a tremendous impact on the overall valuation. We'll be framing the range of
values for the Landfill Committees consideration and we hopefully, will have most of a
draft term sheet completed for that meeting. This Board is tentatively scheduled to
meet on February 14th in a special meeting to consider the terms of that term sheet
which under the terms of our letter of interest to the county which we submitted in the
latter part of last year, runs out on February 18 and is due to the Board of Supervisors
then for their consideration. We think that we have a fairly reasonable range of values
that we'll share with the Landfill Committee next week. I might also say that we're also
doing the rounds in our due diligence and beginning to talk to the Supervisors
themselves. Don and I will, in the next few days, meet with each the five of them to let
them know in general terms where we think we're heading and, we also talked to Jan
Minameyer (?) who is the County CEO, to also let her know and understand where
we're coming from. Some of the issues that were raised at the League of Cities
Meeting of a week and a half ago regarding valuation, are the kind of things that we'll
basically have to haggle out. In the long pull, I think the actual price of the landfill is
going to end up to a larg respect being political and a bargain for price because
depending upon what you assume has a lot to do with the price of the system. In the
end, it's going to be this board as a willing buyer and the Board of Supervisors as willing
sellers having a meeting of the minds. So the next couple weeks should be interesting
and we hope on February 14th to show you in understandable terms what the term
sheet implies to this agency and the basis for the valuation that will appear within that
term sheet.
JC: Any questions, comments?
Jan DeBay question could not be heard.
JAWP130CMUN96WOTES.01 Page 8
BPA: No, at this point were not talking specific terms. What we're trying to do is
understand some of the basic bottom line concerns that the Supervisors and the CEO's
have and share those with them. What we'd like to be able to do is come to a meeting
of the minds and we need to at least talk in general terms right now about what are
values that one side or the other just simply will not move away from.
JC: We do have an action item here which is a Resolution directing the Orange County
Board of Supervisors to request a Resolution of Application with LAFCO and to initiate
proceedings relative to the proposed formation of a Sanitation District No. 99. Any
questions about that from a procedural standpoint, this is just setting in place the
process, it doesn't commit anybody to anything.
Leipzig: opposed.
#14 - Developments related to the County's Commingled Investment Pool,
BPA: There is a report under Agenda Item #14 that was placed in your folders for
reviewing. I'd like to make just two points. First of all, the Orange County Investment
Pool Committee is having an all hands meeting for all the participants in the pool on
February 8 at 8:30 a.m. at Irvine City Hall. There will be a formal announcement going
out to all the participants but that's an early heads up for all of you. The joint agreement
still is pending, there's a few agencies that have already taken that issue up and in fact,
the gentlemen to my left, Irvine Ranch Water District, has considered it and approved
the joint agreement Monday night. The joint agreement, the major feature for this
agency is that it improves our position in the litigation proceeds for Merrill Lynch and
others in exchange for our removing all further recourse on the County on the secured
and unsecured claims that appeared in our May agreement of the comprehensive
settlement agreement. After that meeting of the 81h, we would anticipate to have the
matter also in front of this board on February 14th -the joint agreement. The final plan
of adjustment, the thing that wraps it all into a bow, all of the issues regarding the
vendors claims and the various people holding bonds and all of the cities and special
districts. All of these things will appears in the final plan of adjustment that was issued
by the County in late December. It's undergoing some modification right now and the
disclosure statement was issued on Friday- your staff received it over the weekend.
We began to analyze it on Monday, it's over 280 pages long with appendices and as we
get a handle on that, we'll report back to this Board.
Gullixson: Comments could not be heard.
JC: Comments / Questions? We can move onto Item #15 which is Closed Session.
JAWPDOCIBSVNINMNOTES.01 Page 9
COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 , 13 AND 14
OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
MINUTES
JOINT BOARD MEETING
JANUARY 24, 1996
SRICTS Fo9q
o
� a
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018
ROLL CALL
A regular meeting of that Boards of Directions of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1. 2, 3, 5. 6,
7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on January 24, 1996. at 7:30 p.m., in the
Districts'Administrative Offices. Fallowing the Pledge of Alleglance and invocation the roll was called
and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11. 13. and 14 as
follows:
ACTIVE ALTERNATE
DIRECTORS DIRECTORS
DISTRICT NO.1: a Par McGuigan, Chair Ted R.Moreno
_ James M.Ferryman.Chair pro tom v Arlene Schafer
a Mark A.Murphy Joanne Coontz
Thomas R.Saltarelli Jim Pons
y Roger Stanton William G.Steiner
DISTRICT NO.2: John Collins,Chair George Soon
Daniel T.Welch.Chair pro ters x John M.Gullixson
t Barry Domes _ Bab Bell
y Burrve Durfal, _ Glenn Parker
Naman Z.Eckemode Carol Downey
y James H.Flora Stave Anderson
a Pat McGuaw Ted R.Moreno
Z Mark A.Murphy Jeanne Cos.
Chris Henry _� Don Barl head
ry� Sheldon Singer George I.Baker
Rater Stemon William G.Steiner
Bob ZemH Tom Dal,
DISIRLT NO.3: �_ Sal A. Section.Chart Harr M.Dotson
y Burnie Dun i p. Chair pro tom Glenn Parker
Walter Bowman Gail Kerry
y George Brown _ Marion Bruce Hastings
g John Collins George Scott
James H.Flora Steve Anderson
J_ Don R.Griffin Patsy Marshall
t Victor Leipzig Ralph Bauer
Wally Linn Eva G.Miner
j_ Pat McGuigan TO R.Moreno
Chris NorOy v_ Don Bankhead
g Mmgie L.Rice _ James V.Evans
Sheldon Singer _ George L.Zlalat
Roger Stanton _ Wlliam G. Steiner
3 Creates SIMI, _ Robert Waadsthn
x Bob Zemel _ Tom Daly
DISTRICT NO.5: 1_ Jan Deoay.Chair John C.Cox,Jr.
1 William G.Staner,Chair We hem Roger Stanton
i Jahn C.Cos.Jz. _ Jan Deoay
14111=NO.6: James M.Ferryman,Chair Mane Schals,
Jan Dehay.Chair pro tom Jnon C.Cox.Jr.
g Wlliam G.star. Faster Suman
OBTIIICT NO.7: a Barry Hammond,Chair Mas Ward
g Thomas R.Saharelli,Chair pro tom _ .ern Pons
y Jan Deoay — John C.Coa,Jr.
James M.Ferryman Aflame Schafer
y Pat McGuigan _ Ted R. Marano
Mark A.Murphy _ Joanne Coontz
JL William G.Stei. Rater Stanton
GISIWCT NO.11: y Victor Leipzig,Chap _ Ralph Bauer
J_ Slddey Dettloff,Chair pro tom Ralph Bauer
Roger Stanton William G. Steiner
D61111CT W.13: 1 John M.GWllason, Chain Oinael T.Welch
• Bob Zoned,Chain pro tom Tom Daly
y game Dunlap Glenn Parker
J_ Mark A.Murphy Joanne Coo.
y William G.Steiner Roger Stanton
ONNOCT ND.14: i Thomas R.Balboni Chair Jim Pons
Mark A.Murphy.Chair pro ten — Joanne Coontz
g Barry Hammond _ Mike Wind
William G.Steiner Roger Stanton
y Fear A.Swan Darryl Miller
-2-
1/24/96
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Don McIntyre, General Manager, Blake P. Anderson„
Assistant General Manager-Operations, Judith A.
Wilson, Assistant General Manager-Administration,
Penny Kyle, Board Secretary, Mark Esquer, John Finias,
Janet Gray, Gary Hasenstab, Irwin Haydock, Ed
Hodges, Steve Hovey, Patricia Jcnk, Terri Jos\4ay,
Steve Kozak, John Linder, David Ludwin, Greg
Mathews, Pat McNally, Bob Dolan, Mike Peterman,
Gary Streed, Michelle Tuchman, Dan Tunnicliff, Nancy
Wheatley, Paula Zeller
OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Bill Butler, Bill
Knopf, Phil Stone, George Zlaket, Alternate Director
DISTRICTS 2.3.13 & 14
Receive and file minute excerpts re Board appointments
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the minute excerpts from the following re election of mayors, appointments of
alternate Directors, and seating new members of the Boards, be, and are hereby,
received and ordered filed, as follows: ('Mayor)
City/Aoencv Distnct Active Director Alternate Director
Buena Park 3 Don R. Griffin Patsy Marshall*
Brea 2,3 & 13 Burnie Dunlap- Glenn Parker
Fountain Valley 2 & 3 John Collins George Scott'
Fullerton 2 & 3 Chris Norby' Don Bankhead
La Habra 2 & 3 James H. Flora Steve Anderson*
Los Alamitos 3 Charles E. Sylvia Robert Wahlstrom'
Placentia 2 Norman Z. Eckenrode Carol Downey'
Stanton 3 Sal A. Sapien Harry M. Dotson
Yorba Linda 2 Daniel T. Welch John M. Gullixson'
13 John M. Gullixson' Daniel T. Welch
Midway City 3 Margie L. Rice James V. Evans
Sanitary District
Irvine Ranch 14 Peer A. Swan Darryl G. Miller
Water District
-3-
1/24/96
DISTRICTS 3 & 11
Receive, file, and accept resignation of
Mayor Dave Sullivan of the City of
Huntington Beach and seating first and
second alternates to the Mayor
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the letter from Mayor Dave Sullivan of the City of Huntington Beach resigning
from the Boards of Directors of District Nos. 3 and 11, be, and is hereby, received and
ordered filed; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the following first and second alternates to the mayor be
seated as members of the Boards:
Di_ s� Active Director Alternate Director
3 & 11 Victor Leipzig Ralph Bauer
11 Shirley Dettloff Ralph Bauer
DISTRICT 3
Receive file. and acceot resignation of
Mayor Duane Schuster of the City of
La Palma and sealing first and second
alternates to the Mayor
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the letter from Mayor Duane Schuster of the City of La Palma resigning from the
Board of Directors of District No. 3, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the following first and second alternates to the Mayor be
seated as members of the Board:
District Active Director Alternate Director
3 Wally Linn Eva G. Miner
-4-
1/24/96
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the Joint Chair
The Joint Chair announced that an adjourned regular meeting will be called for all
Districts on Wednesday, February 14. 1996 to discuss the landfill acquisition. The
Orange County Investment Pool agreement with the County of Orange could possibly
be added to the same agenda.
Joint Chair Cox reminded the Directors of the Joint Board Meeting regarding the
Strategic Plan Workshop being held on Saturday, January 27, 1996 at 9:00 AM to
12:00 PM. This meeting would be a review of alternatives to determine Districts'
policies for the strategic plan. In addition, the business community and environmental
community were invited to attend.
It was then reported that at the CASA Conference held in Palm Springs, District staff
members made presentations on various issues of privatization, what it means to be
"business friendly", and the positive impacts of reclaimed water on the bay. The Joint
Chair commended Irwin Haydock, Mike Moore, Adriana Renescu and Mahin Talebi for
their excellent presentations.
The following tentatively scheduled upcoming meetings were then announced:
Ad Hoc Committee re Landfill Issues -Wednesday, January 31, at 5:30 pm
Planning, Design, and Construction Committee -Thursday, February 1, at
5:30 pm
Operations, Maintenance, and Technical Services Committee - Wednesday,
February 7, at 5:30 pm
Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee -Wednesday,
February 14, at 5:30 pm
Adjourned Regular Meeting - Wednesday, February 14, at 7:30 p.m.
Executive Committee -Wednesday, February 21, at 5:30 p.m.
ALL DISTRICTS
Presentation of service oin to District
Employee Robert J. Ooten
Assistant General Manager, Blake Anderson, recognized Districts' Director of
Operations, Robert J. Ooten, for 15 years of service to the Districts and presented
Mr. Ooten with a 15-year service pin.
-5-
1/24/96
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the Joint Chair
The Joint Chair announced that an adjourned regular meeting may need to be called
for all Districts on Wednesday, February 14, 1996 to discuss the landfill acquisition.
The Orange County Investment Pool agreement with the County of Orange could
possibly be added to the same agenda.
Joint Chair Cox reminded the Directors of the Joint Board Meeting regarding the
Strategic Plan Workshop being held on Saturday, January 27, 1996 at 9:00 AM to
12:00 PM. This meeting would be a review of alternatives to determine Districts'
policies for the strategic plan. In addition, the business community and environmental
community were invited to attend.
It was then reported that at the CASA Conference held in Palm Springs, District staff
members made presentations on various issues of privatization, what it means to be
"business friendly", and the positive impacts of reclaimed water in the bay. The Joint
Chair commended Irwin Haydock, Mike Moore, Adriana Renescu and Mahin Talebi for
their excellent presentations.
The following tentatively scheduled upcoming meetings were then announced, as
follows:
Ad Hoc Committee re Landfill Issues - Wednesday, January 31, at 5:30 p.m.
Planning, Design, and Construction Committee - Thursday, February 1, at
5:30 p.m.
Operations, Maintenance, and Technical Services Committee -Wednesday,
February 7, at 5:30 p.m.
Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee -Wednesday,
February 14, at 5:30 p.m.
Adjourned Regular Meeting -Wednesday, February 14, at 7:30 p.m.
Executive Committee - Wednesday, February 21, at 5:30 p.m.
ALL DISTRICTS
Presentation of service pin to District
Emolovee Robert J Ooten
Joint Chair Cox recognized Districts' Director of Operations, Robert J. Dolan, for
15 years of service to the Districts and presented Mr. Ooten with a 15-year service pin.
-5-
1/24/96
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the General Counsel
The General Counsel referred District No. 3 Directors to a memorandum included in
their meeting folders that evening, updating Directors on the status of the matter
entitled County Sanitation Districts No. 3 v. United Technologies Corporation, at al.,
Orange County Superior Court Case No. 722816.
DISTRICT 1
Approval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held
December 13, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as
mailed. Director Roger Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item
be made a matter of record.
DISTRICT 2
Approval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held
December 13, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as
mailed. Director Roger Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item
be made a matter of record.
DISTRICT 3
Approval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held
December 13, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as
mailed. Director Roger Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item
be made a matter of record.
DISTRICT 5
Approval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held
December 13, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as
mailed.
-6-
1/24/96
DISTRICT 6
Aporoval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held
December 13, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as
mailed.
DISTRICT 7
Approval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held
December 13, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as
mailed.
DISTRICT 11
Approval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held
December 13, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as
mailed. Director Roger Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item
be made a matter of record.
DISTRICT 13
Approval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held
December 13, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as
mailed.
DISTRICT 14
Approval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meetings held
November 15, 1995, and December 13, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be
deemed approved, as mailed.
-7-
1/24/96
ALL DISTRICTS
Ratification of payment of Joint and
Individual District Claims
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That payment of Joint and Individual District claims set forth on exhibits "A" , "B", "C",
"D", and "E" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized
below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so
indicated.
11/15/95 1129/95
DISTRICT NO.14 $ 311.129.19 $ 4.563.18
12/13/95 12r2 01/10/96
ALL DISTRICTS
Joint Operating Fund - $775,55524 $747.037.33 $590,282.64
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 393.437.92 1,311,228.89 260.472.07
Joint Working Capital Fund - 471.937.47 212,140.44 225.832.58
Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 69,738.87 9=520 18,647.75
DISTRICT NO. 1 - SWAID 3,001 9,528.64
DISTRICT NO.2 - 30.632.89 1,113.50 46,632.37
DISTRICT NO.3 - 188.228.36 147,79323 69,965.25
DISTRICT NO.5 - 4.80127 648.54 18,008.38
DISTRICT NO.6 - 161.60 62.31 2,593.23
DISTRICT NO.7 - 479,491.04 42.619.70 50,673.44
DISTRICT NO. 11 - 592.00 108,379.84 129,423.70
DISTRICT NO. 13 - 0.00 0.00 154.75
DISTRICT NO. 14 - 15.95 19,941.50 465.52
DISTRICTS NOS.5&6 JOINT - 278,432.18 25,581.80 80,847.33
DISTRICTS NOS.6&7 JOINT - 2,042.89 21128 1,960.71
DISTRICTS NOS.7 &14 JOINT - 6,707.57 15.83 5,169.96
$2702.335.85 $2.628.999.39 $1.510.638.32
1/24/96
ALL DISTRICTS
Authorizing renewal of memberships
in the California Association of Sanitation
Agencies (CASA) and the Association of
Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies (AMSA)
for the 1996 calendar year
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That renewal of memberships in the California Association of Sanitation Agencies
(CASA) and the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies (AMSA) for the 1996
calendar year be, and are hereby, authorized.
ALL DISTRICTS (PDC95-26)
Accepting Purchase of Spark Ignited
Engines for Use in Central Power
Generation Systems, Job No. J-19A as
complete
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 96-1, accepting Purchase
of Spark Ignited Engines for use in Central Power Generation Systems, Job
No. J-19A, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion, and
approving final Closeout Agreement for a final total contract amount of
$19,436,644.82. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these
minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive and file draft minutes of the Ad Hoc
Committee re Landfill Issues
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the draft minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re Landfill Issues meetings held on
December 13 and December 27, 1995, and January 10 and January 17, 1996, be,
and are hereby, received and ordered filed.
-9-
1/24/96
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive and file draft minutes of the
Steering Committee
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the draft minutes of the Steering Committee meeting held on December 13,
1995, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed.
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive and file draft minutes of the Operations.
Maintenance. and Technical Services Committee
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the draft minutes of the Operations, Maintenance, and Technical Services
Committee meeting held on January 3, 1996, be, and are hereby, received and
ordered filed.
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive and file draft minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee
re Space Utilization Study
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the draft minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization Study meeting
held on January 4, 1996, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed.
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive and file draft minutes of the Planning
Design. and Construction Committee
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the draft minutes of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee meeting
held on January 4, 1996, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed.
-10-
1/24/96
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive and file draft minutes of the Finance. Administration
and Human Resources Committee
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the draft minutes of the Finance, Administration, and Human Resources
Committee meeting held on January 10, 1996, be, and are hereby, received and
ordered filed.
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive and file draft minutes of the Executive Committee
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the draft minutes of the Executive Committee meeting held on January 17,
1996, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed.
ALL DISTRICTS
Retaining current committee system of three
policy committees, and convening the Executive
Committee on an as-needed basis
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors concur with the recommended actions of the Steering
Committee to retain the current committee system of three policy committees, and
convene the Executive Committee on an as-needed basis.
ALL DISTRICTS (PDC96-02)
Acceptino Miscellaneous Improvements at
Plant No. 1. Job No. P142. and Miscellaneous
Improvements at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-49.
as complete
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 96-2, accepting
Miscellaneous Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P142, and Miscellaneous
Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-49, as complete, authorizing execution of a
Notice of Completion, and approving Final Closeout Agreement for a final total
contract amount of$239,213.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby
made a part of these minutes.
-11-
1/24/96
ALL DISTRICTS (PDC96-04)
AAoproving plans and soecifications re Job
Nos. P1-41: P1-43: P1-44: P248: P2-50:
P2-53-2: SP19950021: SP19950059
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 96-3, approving plans and
specifications for Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers 3, 4, and 5 at Plant No. 1, Job
No. P1-41; Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-43;
Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 1, Job No. P7-44; Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers D
through Q at Plant No. 2, Job No. P248; Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems
at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-50; Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53-2;
Tunnel Cover Replacement at Billings Tunnel at Plant No. 2, SP19950021; Sludge
Piping Modification Primary Sedimentation Basins 6-15, SP19950059, and
authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. Said
resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS (PDC96-05)
Actions re Demolition of Old Laboratory. Job
No. J-11-1. and Restoration of Old Laboratory
for Human Resources Department, Job
No. J-11-2
Providing for the conversion of the Old
Laboratory, Job No. J-11-1. to Restoration
of Old Laboratory for Human Resources
Department. Job No. J-11-2
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the conversion of the Old Laboratory, Job No. J-11-1, to Restoration of
Old Laboratory for Human Resources Department, Job No. J-11-2, and
providing for funds in the amount of$375,000.00 for said project, be, and is
hereby, approved.
-12-
1124196
Authorizing the General Manager to establish
the date for receipt of bids for Interior Asbestos
Removal from Old Laboratory, Job No. J-11-1A
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to establish the date
for receipt of bids for Interior Asbestos Removal from Old Laboratory, Job
No. J-11AA; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the budgeted amount of$150,000.00, which was an
approved portion of Job No. J-11-1, be, and is hereby, authorized to be
transferred to Job No. J-11-1A.
ALL DISTRICTS (PDC96-06)
Aoorovinc Addendum No. 1 to the Professional
Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers
re Job Nos. J-33 and J-34
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee certification of the final
negotiated fee relative to Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement
with John Carollo Engineers to prepare plans and specifications and to provide
construction support services for Standby Power Reliability Modifications, Job
No. J-33, and Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades, Job No. J-34, providing for
additional design and construction services, be, and is hereby, received, ordered
filed, and approved; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 96-4,
approving Addendum No. 1 to said agreement with John Carollo Engineers for said
additional services on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, subconsultant
fees, and fixed profit, for an additional amount not to exceed $226,740.00, increasing
the total authorized compensation from $950,252.00 to an amount not to exceed
$1,176,992.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these
minutes.
-13-
1/24/96
ALL DISTRICTS (OMTS95-041)
Actions re Compressed Natural Gas Refueling
Station, Job No. P1-51
Approving Professional Services Agreement
with SoCalGas
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 96-5, approving
Professional Services Agreement with Southern California Gas Company
(SOCaIGas)for design and construction management services for
Compressed Natural Gas Refueling Station, Job No. P1-51, on an hourly-rate
basis for labor plus overhead, for an amount not to exceed $64,500.00. Said
resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
Authorizing the General Manager to
solicit bids and award purchase order
contract re Job No. P1-51A
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to solicit bids re
Purchase of Equipment for Compressed Natural Gas Refueling Station, Job
No. P1-51A; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized
to award a purchase order contract to the lowest bidder for an amount not to
exceed $399,300.00, plus applicable taxes and freight.
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive and file monthly investment report of
Pacific Investment Management Company
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the monthly investment report regarding performance monitoring of Pacific
Investment Management Company be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed.
-14-
1/24/96
DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7 & 11 (ONLY)
Actions re AIG Financial Products
Cori). (AIG) for replacement of
Letter of Credit. Refunding Certificates
of Participation. Series 1992
Approving Substitute Standby
Certificate Purchase Agreement
with Barclays Bank
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt the following resolutions, approving
Substitute Standby Certificate Purchase Agreement with Barclays Bank, and
authorizing staff to take all necessary actions re replacement of the Standby
Letter of Credit:
District No. Resolution No.
1 96-6-1
2 96-7-2
3 96-8-3
5 96 9-5
6 96-10-6
7 96-11-7
11 96-12-11
Authorizing staff to retain services of
bond counsel and authorizing the General
Manager to execute agreement
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to retain the services of a bond
counsel firm for the transaction, as recommended by General Counsel, in an
amount not to exceed $25,000.00, to be reimbursed to the Districts by AIG;
and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized
to execute said agreement, in form approved by General Counsel.
-15-
1/24196
Directing staff to submit all necessary
documents for this transaction at the
January 24. 1996 meeting for execution
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That staff be, and is hereby, directed to submit all necessary documents for
this transaction to the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 & 11, at the January 24, 1996 meeting for execution.
ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR96-02)
Authorizing staff to issue a purchase order
to AmeriData for Purchase of Four Compaq
Server-Class Computers (Specification
No. E-262R-21
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue a purchase order to AmeriData for
Four Compaq Server-Class Computers (Specification No. E-262R-2), for use as
Districts'-wide network servers, for a total amount not to exceed $135,875.00, plus
sales tax and 1% CMAS fees.
Director Mark A. Murphy requested that his abstention from voting on this item be
made a matter of record.
ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR96-03)
Amendino Resolution No, 95-105.
Authorizing the establishment of Provisions
for Programmers covered by the Professional
Employees MOU for standby and callback
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 96-13, amending
Resolution No. 95-105, authorizing the establishment of provisions for Programmers
covered by the Professional Employees MOU for standby and callback pay. Said
resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
-16-
1/24/96
ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR96-05)
Amending Resolution No. 95-105,
Rescindino provisions granting a 1% salary
increase to all employees re retiree medical
health premium offset program
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 96-14, amending
Resolution No. 95-105, rescinding provisions granting a 1% salary increase to all
employees re retiree medical health premium offset program.
Director John M. Gullixson requested that his opposition to the motion be made a
matter of record.
ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR96-08)
Authorizing staff to reoorl to Southern
California Association of Governments (SCAG)
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to report to Southern California Association of
Governments (SCAG) the Sanitation Districts' position on the Finance Chapter of
SCAG's Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide.
ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR96-06)
Actions re Benchmarking and Performance
Measurement Update
Verbal report of Assistant General Manager
The Assistant General Manager, Judy Wilson, gave a brief report on
Benchmarking and Performance Measurement. She then introduced Greg
Mathews, Principle Administrative Analyst, who gave an overview of costs
over the last ten years, and Bob Oolen, Director of Operations, who shared his
observations on the privatization program in Indianapolis.
Receive and file staff report
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the staff report dated January 10, 1996 re Benchmarking and
Performance Measurement Update, be, and is hereby, received and ordered
filed.
-17-
1124/96
ALL DISTRICTS
Directing that the Board of Supervisors be
requested to file a Resolution of Application
with the Local Agency Formation Commission
(LAFCO)for County Sanitation District No. 99
re proposed acquisition of County of Orange
Integrated Waste Management System
After a brief update by the Assistant General Managers of Administration and
Operations, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 96-15, directing that the
Orange County Board of Supervisors be requested to file a Resolution of Application
with the Orange County Local Agency Formation Commission initiating proceedings
relative to proposed formation of County Sanitation District No. 99 for acquisition,
maintenance, and operation of a landfill and refuse disposal system. Said resolution,
by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
Director Victor Leipzig requested that his opposition to the motion be made a matter
of record.
ALL DISTRICTS
Status report re County's Commingled Investment Pool
Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager of Operations, gave a brief report on the
status of the Orange County Commingled Investment Pool Committee and the
County of Orange bankruptcy.
ALL DISTRICTS
General Counsel's comments Prior to Closed Session
General Counsel reported to the Directors the need for a closed session as
authorized by Government Code Section 54956.9 to discuss and consider the item
that is specified as Item 15(b)(1) on the published Agenda.
_18_
1/24/96
ALL DISTRICTS
Convene in Closed Session pursuant to
Government Code Section 54956.9
The Boards convened in closed session at 8:35 p.m. pursuant to Government Code
Section 54956.9. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Boards of
Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code
Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of
Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. A report of actions
taken will be publicly reported at the time the approved action becomes final re
Agenda Item 15(b)(1).
ALL DISTRICTS
Reconvene in regular session
At 8:46 p.m., the Boards reconvened in regular session.
DISTRICT 1
Adiournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be
adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:46 p.m.
DISTRICT 2
Adiournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be
adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:46 p.m.
_1 y_
1/24/96
DISTRICT 3 (PDC96-01)
Actions re Imorovements to Miller-Holder
Trunk Sewer System, Reach 2 (5,800 feet
North of Rosecrans Avenue to Imoeria(
HHi hway). Contract No. 3-38-2
Aoorovino Change Order No. 1
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for said project,
authorizing an addition of$45,255.68 to the contract with Calfon Construction,
Inc. for seven items of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved.
AAoorovinc Chanae Order No. 2
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for said project,
authorizing a deduction of$32,126.00 from the contract with Callon
Construction, Inc. for adjustment of engineer's quantities, be, and is hereby,
approved.
Acceotinc Contract No. 3-38-2 as complete
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 96-16-3, accepting
said project as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion, and
approving final Closeout Agreement for a final total contract amount of
$1,104,882.68. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of
these minutes.
DISTRICT 3
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be
adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:46 p.m.
-20-
1/24/96
DISTRICT 5
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be
adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:46 p.m.
DISTRICT 6
A,dJournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be
adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:46 p.m.
DISTRICT 7
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be
adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:46 p.m.
DISTRICT 11
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be
adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:46 p.m.
DISTRICT 13
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be
adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:46 p.m.
-21-
1n4196
DISTRICT 14
Journmenl
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be
adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:46 p.m.
Secretary oft o r of Directors
of County Sa ' ion ' tricts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14
_22_
rvnu m, bltltl - JI oral "UMNU U U I IAL PROCESSING DATE 11110105 PAGE 7
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITAT.ON DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 11/16/95 POSTING DATE 11/15/95
SUMMARY AMOUNT
01 OPER FUND $231.50
01 CONSTR FUND $1.345.57
02 OPER FUND $1.759.25
02 CAP FAC FUND $45.970.48
02 CONSTR FUND $4.694.95
03 OPER FUND $25.127.00
03 CAP FAC FUND $423.168.82
03 CONSTR FUND $3.873.40
050PER FUND $429.60
05 CONSTR FUND $1,076.49
06 OPER FUND $173.00
06 CONSTR FUND $758 UB
07 OPER FUND $6.864.61
07 CAP FAC FUND $550,170.68
m 07 CONSTR FUND $1.307.43
x 011 OPER FUND $249.25
2
.a 011 CAP FAC FUND $202,677./2
011 CONST FUND $1.197.67
0130PER FUND $8.50
013 CONST FUND $3.40
ni 0140PER FUND $5000 $ 5000
014 CAP FAC FUND $311.059:23 311,059:23
014 CONST FUND $19.98 19.96
05 5 6 OPER FUND $166.94
0536 CAP FAC FUND $156,99077 $311,129.19
07$14 OPER FUND $794.77
JT OPER FUND $658.139.29
CORP $918.505.92
SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $19.724.59
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $306.045.29
$3.6".581.74
FUNDNO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 11r12/95 PAGED
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID IM9/95 POSTING DATE 11129/95
WARRANTNO. VENDOR
148595 WACKENHUT CORP. $14.300.70 CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS
148596 WALL STREET JOURNAL 5306.01 SUBSCRIPTION
146697 WARREN GORHAM 8 LAMONT INC $190.74 PUBLICATION
148598 WAXIE $222.71 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
10599 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY 523,912.54 CAUSTIC SODA MO8-23-95
1486DO WEST4JTE SUPPLY CO. SB13.23 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
148601 WESCO $574.93 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
148602 WOLFE AND ASSOCIATES,INC. $3,949,00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
148603 ROURKE,WOODRUFF 8 SPRADLIN $92.805.51 LEGAL SERVICES MO7-26-95
148604 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $979.54 LAB SUPPLIES
148605 JOHNSON YOKOGAWA CORP. $81,98 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
TYl TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 11129r95 $1.854112.20
X
2
Uf
SUMMARY AMOUNT
to
1 t2 OPER FUND $14.25
F+
02 CAP FAC FUND 52,041.51
63 0PER FUND $52.621.92
03 CAP FAC FUND $23.926.29
05 OPER FUND $689.25
07 OPER FUND $430.42
07 CAP FAC FUND $20,292.92
011 OPER FUND $9.593,95
f1,94o.43 $1,940.43
014 CAP FAC FUND f2.622.75 2,612.11
0586 OPER FUND $17.60
0897 OPER FUND $211.12 $4,563.18
07814 OPER FUND $16.59
JT OPER FUND $913.082.79
CORP $569,880.05
SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $28,159,68
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $225.570.47
$1,8.51,112.20
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 12J08/95 PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 12113/95 POSTING DATE 12H3/95
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
148631 A-1 VISUAL SYSTEMS $1.533.50 OFFICE SUPPLIES
148632 ABB INDUSTRIAL SYSTEMS INC $2.660.00 TRAINING-MAINTENANCE
148633 AG TECH COMPANY $58.160.63 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91
148634 ABRASIVE ENO.TOOLING&EQUIP. $142.49 HARDWARE
148635 ACORN CONSULTING $4,485.00 CONSULTING SERVICES
148636 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $18,037.20 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.O.8-9-89
148637 ALTA-ROBBINS $320.70 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
148638 AMERIDATA $1.495.49 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
148639 BLAKE P.ANDERSON $100.57 REIMBURSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE
148540 ANIXTER-DISTRIBUTION $494.79 COMPUTER SUPPLIES
148641 APPLE ONE $4,083.20 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
148642 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $16,168.95 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
148643 AQUATIC BIOASSAY&CONSULT $2.835.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
m 148W ARENS INDUSTRIES,INC. $4,072.51 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
X 148645 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT $851.90 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
.�. 148646 ARMOR-VAC $1,50D.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES
148647 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. $120.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL
148648 ASSOCIATED CONCRETE PRODUCTS $533.36 BUILDING MATERIALS
1486,9 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $4,333.66 PAYROLL SERVICES
t"1 14865D E S BABCOCK&SONS INC $555.00 LAB ANALYSIS
14BB51 BANANA BLUEPRINT $592.66 PRINTING M.O.11-07-94
148652 BANCROFT-WHITNEY CO.. $333.48 PUBLICATION
148653 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $810.20 BATTERIES
148654 BAUER COMPRESSOR $311.00 COMPRESSOR PARTS
148655 BEAR STATE PUMP&EQUIP $794.76 PUMP PARTS
148656 BEHR PROCESS CORP $62.94 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148657 BEV CUSTER $86.20 PUBLICATIONS
148658 WT BILLARD $588.69 BUILDING REPAIRS
148659 BIO-GRO DIVISION $43,309.28 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 426.95
148660 BLAIR-MARTIN CO,INC. $189.43 VALVE MANIFOLDS
148661 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $16,728.10 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI.41,P248
148662 SNI BOOKS $167.80 BOOKS
148663 THE BURKE COMPANY $86.12 CONTAINERS
148664 BURKE ENGINEERING CO $292.17 ELECTRIC PARTS
148665 BUSH&ASSOCIATES,INC. $4,504.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-0-94
148668 CH2M HILL $215,760.92 ENGINEERING SERVICES JJI
148667 C.L.TECHNOLOGY $720.00 GAS ANALYSIS SERVICES
148MB C M H SOFTWARE $256.50 SOFTWARE
148869 C.P.I. $1.549.91 LAB SUPPLIES
148670 CS COMPANY $6,012.92 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
148671 CALFON CONSTRUCTION $452.384.84 CONSTRUCTION 7.22&7-24
148672 CALTROL,INC. $9,552.85 HARDWARE
148673 CALIFORNIA AUTO COLLISION,INC. $2,581.01 TRUCK BODY REPAIR
148674 CALIF.ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS $16.00 MECHANICAL PARTS
148675 CALIFORNIA WATER ENVIRONMENTAL $855.48 PUBLICATIONS
148676 CAMALI CORP. $400.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 129895 PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 1211395 POSTING DATE 1211395
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
148677 CANUS CORPORATION $693.39 FIBER OPTIC CABLE
148678 CARLETON ENGINEERS $25.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES-AIR QUALITY
148679 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $348.25 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-38,J-33
148680 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $1.458.78 OFFICE FURNITURE
148681 CERFNET $52.35 COMPUTER SERVICES
148682 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $10.117.73 PUMP PARTS
148683 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $16,571.44 ELECTRIC PARTS
140664 CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS $613.50 FREIGHT
148685 CONSUMER PIPE $1,877.64 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
148686 CONTINENTAL EQUIP&SUPPLY $548.73 MISC.HARDWARE
148687 COOPER CAMERON CORP. S3,368.51 ENGINE PARTS
148688 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $132.18 TRUCK PARTS
X 148689 COUNTERPART ENTERPRISES $246.86 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
= 14869D COUNTY CLERK $200.00 EXEMPTION FEE
by 145691 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $3.172.65 ELECTRIC PARTS
148692 CREATIVE SCREEN ARTS $420.33 SAFETY TAGS
148693 CROMPTON 8 KNOWLES COLORS $181.80 TRACING DYE
4l 148694 CHARLES P.CROWLEY,CO. $911.99 INSTRUMENT PARTS
1 148695 DGS-PROCUREMENT $75.00 PUBLICATIONS
N 148696 ALBERT W DAMES INC $135,285.34 CONSTRUCTION 3-UR
148697 DELL COMPUTER CORP $25.275.39 COMPUTER PARTS
148698 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIF. $34,363.25 DENTAL INSURANCE PLAN M.0.1-12-94
148699 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $940.00 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE
148700 DRESSER INDUSTRIES S2.133.68 INSTRUMENT PARTS
148701 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $299.44 PAINT SUPPLIES
148702 OVALS SALES $428.58 FITTINGS
148703 ESP NORTH $1,957.22 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
148704 E-TRACE INSTRUMENTS S287.00 COMPUTER PARTS
148705 EDWARDS HIGH VACUUM INTER. $148.92 LAB SUPPLIES
1487D8 HELEN EGGERS $401.08 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148707 ELECTAIRTOOLCO $752.17 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
145708 ENCHANTER,INC. S2,800.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5.24-95
148709 ESSCO PUMPS AND CONTROLS $401.17 PUMP PARTS
14871D ENVIRONMENTAL PROD.USA S2,413.60 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
148711 EXFO $8,795.00 FIBEROPTIC TEST KIT
148712 FLUID TECH.SALES $2,146.44 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
148713 FST SAND AND GRAVEL,INC. S511.04 ROAD BASE MATERRLS
148714 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $13,535.00 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91
148715 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $549.75 AIR FREIGHT
148716 FIRST CHOICE $810.55 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT
148717 FISCHER B PORTER CO. $356.21 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES
148718 FISHER SCIENTIFICCO. $1,370.50 LAB SUPPLIES
148719 FISONS INSTRUMENTS $840.45 LAB SUPPLIES
148720 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $261.18 PHOTO SUPPLIES
146721 CRY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $18,678.96 WATER USE
148722 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $498.40 PAINT SUPPLIES
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 12/08195 PAGES
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 12/13/95 POSTING DATE 12/13/95
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
148723 THE FOXBORO CO. $133.09 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
148724 FRY'S ELECTRONICS $573.65 ELECTRONIC&COMPUTER SUPPLIES
148725 FULLER FOND $17,729.19 TRUCK
148726 CITY OF FULLERTON $373.51 WATER USE
148727 GST,INC. $1.032.66 OFFICE SUPPLIES
148728 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $2,006.87 LUMBER/HARDWARE
148729 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $2.569.84 CHEMICALS
148730 THE GARTNER GROUP $32,583.34 SERVICE AGREEMENT
148731 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $388.59 ELECTRIC PARTS
148732 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1.024.97 TELEPHONE SERVICES
148733 GIERLICH-MITCHELL,INC. $6,157.46 PUMP PARTS
148734 GA INDUSTRIES INC. $1,486.00 VALVE
m 148735 GOODWAY TECHNOLOGIES CORP. $999.49 INDUSTRIAL VACUUM
x 148736 GOVT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOC. $480.00 CAFR AWARD SUBMITTAL
2
148137 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS 53,888.01 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
148738 GRASSY S.T.I. $2.389.26 ENGINE PARTS
--I 148739 GRAYBAR $60.30 COMMUNICATION SUPPLIES
148740 DGA CONSULTANTS $10,806.11 SURVEYING SERVICES MO8-23.95&MO 64-94
n 148741 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS $3,786.60 CONTAINER RENTALS
W 148742 PL HAWN CO,INC. $9,440.42 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
148743 HELLO DIRECT $397.35 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
148744 HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT $2,083.33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN.
148745 HEWLETT PACKARD $202.58 SERVICE AGREEMENT
148748 HILTI,INC. $3.045.03 TOOLS
140747 HOERBIGER CVS CALIF.,INC. $279.08 COMPRESSOR PARTS
148748 HOLMES&NARVER,INC. $34.847.59 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-04,P2.53
148749 HOME DEPOT $898.07 SMALL HARDWARE
148750 SOUTHWEST SCIENTIFIC,INC. $928.16 METER PARTS
148751 PIS HUGHES CO,INC. $1,407.77 PAINT SUPPLIES
148752 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $19.33 WATER USE
148753 HYCLONE LABORATORIES INC $820.61 LAB SUPPLIES
148764 IDM CONTROLS INC $303.00 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
148755 IEEE SERVICE CENTER - C87 $766.65 PUBLICATIONS
148756 IPCO SAFETY $4,061.19 SAFETY SUPPLIES
148757 IRD MECHANALYSIS $537.54 INSTRUMENT PARTS
140758 ITT BARTON SALES $2,023.51 BACKFLOW TESTERS
148759 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL 5124,586.93 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.11-1&92
148760 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $210.51 CONNECTORS
148761 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $5.10 WATER USE
148762 J.D.I.TECHNOLOGIES $500.63 PRINTER PARTS
148763 AT COMPUTER SOURCE,INC. $1.908.10 SOFTWARE
148764 JAMISON ENGINEERING $5.105.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
148765 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $603.28 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
148766 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO. $2.629.66 GAUGE '
148767 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $137.69 ELECTRIC PARTS
148768 JONES CHEMICALS,INC. $15.239.78 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE MO 4-26-95
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE IX08195 PAGE 4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 12/13195 POSTING DATE 12/13195
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
148769 KALLEEN'S COMPUTER PRODUCTS 51,190.96 COMPUTER SUPPLIES
148770 FRANCES L KALUZNY $1.760.00 HUMAN RESOURCES CONSULTANT
148771 KENNEDY HYDRAULICS $1,357.38 MOTOR REPAIRS
148772 KING BEARING,INC. $1.548.42 MACHINE SUPPLIES
148773 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $3,096.24 TOOLS
148774 LEE&RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC. $8.353.31 ENGINEERING SERVICES
1487'76 K.P.LINDSTROM.INC. $9,656.61 ENVIR.CONSULTING SERVICES MO 12.9.90
145776 MPS $97.88 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
148777 MACOMCO $464.10 SERVICE AGREEMENT
14877E MAD SYSTEMS $526.90 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
148779 MAINTENANCE TECH.SERV. $1,141.14 MISC.HARDWARE
148780 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS,INC. $5.088.21 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
m 148781 MARDEN SUSCO INC. $93.75 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
Z 148782 DICK E MARSH $40.00 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148783 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $576.65 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
148784 MIDWAY MFG.&MACHINING $8,028.39 MECHANICAL REPAIRS
148785 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3.408.35 UNIFORM RENTALS
n 148786 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO. $217.00 INSTRUMENT
I 148787 MOORE INDUSTRIES $972.83 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
r 148788 NEC TECHNOLOGIES.INC. $8.215.65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
148789 NATIONAL ENVIRO.INFO.SERV. $111.50 PUBLICATION
148790 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES $6.001.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES
148791 NATIONAL WATER RESEARCH $50.000.00 ANNUAL CONTRIBUTION-NWRI
148792 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $676.13 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
148793 NETWORK GENERAL CORP. $4.999.61 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
148794 NEWARK ELECTRONICS $260.52 INSTRUMENT PARTS -
148795 NICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY $3,144.43 LUBRICANTSIDIESEL FUEL
148795 LOYD T.NITZEN II AND $22.000.00 LIABILITY CLAIM SETTLEMENT
148797 NORGREN $169.40 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
14879E NORTEL PRODUCT TRAINING $1.345.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
148799 NU-WEST FABRICATION $304.28 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
148800 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $4,438.45 OFFICE SUPPLIES
148801 THE OHMART CORP $1.113.91 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
148802 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $2,318.28 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
148803 ORANGE COURIER $294.50 COURIER SERVICES
148804 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. $2.626.01 FITTINGS
145805 ORRICK HERRINGTON&SUTCLIFFE $4.000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
148806 OXYGEN SERVICE $2,547.39 SPECIALTY GASES
148807 COUNTY OF ORANGE $60.00 ADMINISTRATIVE FEES
148808 ORANGE CO EMPLOYEES $204,798.00 EARLY RETIREMENT PROGRAM MO3.8-95
148809 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $10,848.51 WORKER'S COMP REIMBURSEMENT
148810 COUNTY OF ORANGE $199.00 PERMITS
148811 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT $84,594.50 GAP WATER USE M.O.6.9-93
148812 PSI $881.52 HARDWARE
148813 PSOC(POOL SUPPLY OF OC) $113.73 OPERATING SUPPLIES
148874 PSSI $5,445.45 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 12/08/95 PAGE 5
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 12/13/95 POSTING DATE 12/13/95
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
148816 PACIFIC CLIPPINGS $113.20 CONTRACT SERVICE
148816 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $1.777.66 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
148817 PACIFIC PARTS $55,623.20 INSTRUMENT PARTS
148818 PACO PUMPS $1,456.22 FITTINGS
148819 PACIFIC BELL $16.62 TELEPHONE SERVICES
146820 PACIFIC WALK-IN MEDICAL $60.00 MEDICAL SERVICES
148821 PAGENET $82.10 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
148822 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $5.294.30 REIMB.PETTY CASH,TRAINING&TRAVEL
148623 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $110,041.20 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3.29.95
148824 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS $358.08 CONSULTING SERVICE
148825 POLYPURE,INC. $20,931.60 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92
148526 POWER DESIGN $943.90 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS
fn 148827 POWER SYSTEMS TESTING CO. $1,100.00 REPAIR RELAY METERS
2 148528 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $96.00 ICE FOR SAMPLES
148829 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE IND. $304.0D SOIL TESTING
148830 PROMINENT FLUID CONTROL,INC. $799.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL
148831 PRIMA $205.00 MEMBERSHIP FEE
C'1 148832 PUBLIC SECTOR EXCELLENCE $2,250.00 TRAINING CONSULTANT-RISK MGMT
I 148833 PUMPING SOLUTIONS $175.71 PUMP PARTS
148834 QUESTRON CORP. $848.00 LAB SUPPLIES
148835 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $1.891.16 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS
148836 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $2.062.75 TRASH REMOVAL
148837 RAIN FOR RENT $2,747.94 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
140B38 RED WING SHOES $254.29 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES
148839 THE REGISTER $2.149.60 NOTICES&ADS
148840 REISH MARINE STUDIES,INC. $760.0D OCEAN MONITORING
148841 REMEDYTEMP $14,709.17 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
148842 REPUBLIC ENGINES $84.47 TRUCK PARTS
146843 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $47.42 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
148844 SCHWING AMERICA,INC. $1,506.43 PUMP PARTS
148845 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $275.84 SPECIALTY GASES
148846 SEA COAST DESIGNS $2.909.25 LAB SUPPLIES
148647 CITY OF SEAL BEACH $301.05 WATER USE
148848 SELF INSURANCE PLANS $674.66 LICENSE FEE
148849 SENTIENT SYSTEMS,INC. $8,400.00 FACILITATOR SERVICES
148850 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $3.454.12 TOOLS
148851 SHASTA ELECTRIC $21.710.00 CONTRACT SERVICE
148852 SHURELUCK SALES $1.550.08 TOOLSOIARDWARE
148853 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $1,796.09 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS
140854 SMITH-EMERY CO. $216.00 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-13-94
148855 SOUTH BAY FOUNDRY INC $5.252.81 MANHOLE FRAMES
148856 SOUTH COAST WATER $160.00 LAB SUPPLIES
148857 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. $62,778.45 POWER
148858 STARNA CELLS,INC. $173.19 LAB SUPPLIES
148859 SUMMIT STEEL $2,0%67 METAL
148860 SUNSETFORD $136.19 TRUCK PARTS
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 1VO8195 PAGES -
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 12JI3195 POSTING DATE 12/13/95
WARRANTNO. VENDOR
148861 SUPELCO,INC. 881.20 LAB SUPPLIES
148862 SUPER CHEM CORP. $670.80 CHEMICALS
148863 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $214.40 ELECTRIC CART PARTS
140B84 TEKMAR COMPANY $181.93 LAB SUPPLIES
148865 THEODORE ROBBINS FORD $2.181.93 VEHICLE RENTAL-SUMMER PROGRAM
140866 THE RYAN TYLER GROUP $740.00 BANK STATEMENT RECONCILIATION
148867 THOMAS BROS MAPS $4.310.00 PRINTING
148868 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $117.26 MECHANICAL PARTS
148869 TONER SYSTEM INTERNATIONAL $1,303.78 PRINTER SUPPLIES
148870 TONYS LOCK 8 SAFE SERVICE $148.67 LOCKS 8 KEYS
148871 TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY.INC. $3,973.84 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.0.5-11-94
148872 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY, INC. $341.04 TRUCK PARTS
m 148873 TRUCK PARTS SUPPLY $78.63 TRUCK PARTS
X 148874 TRUESDAIL LABS $4,906.00 LAB SERVICES
= 148875 JG TUCKER 8 SON,INC. $6,526.05 INSTRUMENT PARTS
bU 148876 TWINING LABORATORIES 813,712.88 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-13-94
148877 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC 330.00 LAB SUPPLIES
148878 UNISOURCEB/OR BUTLER PAPER $239.74 OFFICE SUPPLIES
f"1 148879 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $92.38 PARCEL SERVICES
pt 14688D VWR SCIENTIFIC $1.638.83 LAB SUPPLIES
148881 VALIN CORPORATION SBB0.59 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
148882 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS $2.225.01 FREIGHT
IM883 VERNE'S PLUMBING $475.00 PLUMBING SERVICES
148884 VERTEX SYSTEMS $7.480.00 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT
148885 VORTEX INDUSTRIES $544.28 BUILDING REPAIRS
148886 WACKENHUT CORP. $31.678.23 CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS
148887 WALCON CONSTRUCTION CO. $276.034.94 CONSTRUCTION 5-37-3
148888 CARL WARREN&CO. $443.77 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR
148889 WARRINGTON $3,402.50 SERVICE AGREEMENT
148890 WATERS CORPORATION $3.674.01 SERVICE AGREEMENT
148891 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $20.719.94 CAUSTIC SODA MO 8-23.95
148892 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $968.04 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
148893 WESCO $14.43 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
148894 WIRE MARKERS,INC. 82,245.72 MARKERS
148895 XEROX CORP. $18.307.19 COPIER LEASES
148896 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $850.92 LAB SUPPLIES
148897 RICHARD YOUNG PRODUCTS $660.90 INSTRUMENT PARTS
148898 ZYMARK CORP. $851.23 LAB EQUIPMENT
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 12/13/95 $2.702,335.05
FUND NO 9199 IT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 12/06/95 PAGE 7
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 12113195 POSTING DATE 12113/95
SUMMARY AMOUNT
#1 OPER FUND $560.60
#2 OPER FUND $5,462.08
02 CAP FAC FUND $25.170.81
#3 OPER FUND $41,851.11
03 CAP FAC FUND $146,371.25
#5 OPER FUND $4,801.27
#6 OPER FUND 5161.60
97 OPER FUND $8,690.32
07 CAP FAC FUND $470.800.72
#11 OPER FUND $288.00
IT 011 CAP FAC FUND $304.00
x #14 CAP FAC FUND $15.95
#5&6 OPER FUND $2,319.55
00 #5&6 CAP FAC FUND 9276,112.63
i--1 NV OPER FUND $2,042.89
i
07&14 OPER FUND $8,707.57
c' JT OPER FUND $775,555.24
V CORF $393,437.92
SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $69,738.87
Jr DIST WORKING CAPITAL $471,937.47
52,702,335.85
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 12/21/95 PAGE 1 -
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 12/27195 POSTING DATE 12127195
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
148920 AG TECH COMPANY $53.227.33 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-&91
148921 ASL CONSULTING ENGINEERS $1,028.74 ATWOOD SUBTRUNCK PLAN PREPERATION
148922 ACORN CONSULTING $5.070.00 CONSULTING SERVICES
148923 AIR LIQUIDE AMERICA CORP. $289.42 SPECIALTY GASSES
148924 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $18.322.00 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.O.8-9419
148925 ALAMO MOTOR LODGE $634.91 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148926 ALL METALS PROCESSING $1.243.29 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148927 ALUMINUM FORGE CO $1,008.11 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148928 AMERIDATA $1.588.19 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
146929 AMERICAN AIRLINES $4,149.88 TRAVEL SERVICES
148930 AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION $210.00 SEMINAR-VIDEOTAPE
148931 AMERICAN SIGMA $5.682.76 MISCELLANEOUS HARDWARE
m 148932 AMER.SOCIETY FOR MICROBIOLOGY $325.00 LAB SUPPLIES
X 148933 AMOCO ENERGY TRADING $121,883.57 NATURAL GAS NO 8-28-95
148934 AMSCO $68.12 SERVICE AGREEMENT
148935 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL $990.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
148936 APPUED BIOSYSTEMS,INC. $1,185.78 LAB SERVICES
l7 148937 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $2.633.11 PRINTER PARTS
I 148938 APPLIED ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS $3,000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
�-' 148939 AQUATIC BIOASSAY&CONSULT $8.795.00 LABORATORY SERVICES
148940 ARMOR-VAC $522.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES
148941 ARROWHEAD ELECTRIC CORP. $345.71 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
148942 ARROWHEAD PURLTAS WATERS $3.172.78 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148943 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. $60.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL
148944 AMSA $425.00 REGISTRATION
148945 ATLANTIC ENERGY SERVICE $8.993.00 GENERATOR REPAIR
148946 BFI MEDICAL WASTE SYSTEMS $87.80 WASTE DISPOSAL
148947 BANANA BLUEPRINT $2,687.24 PRINTINGM.O.11-07-94
148948 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $470.91 BATTERIES
148949 BAXTER EDWARDS $1,399.09 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148950 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $3.605.00 LAB SUPPLIES
148951 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $274.65 TRUCK WASH TICKETS
148952 BEAR STATE PUMP&EQUIPMENT $79.10 PUMP PARTS
148953 BECKMAN INDUSTRIAL $1,849.34 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
146954 BEST WESTERN PLAZA INT.INN $911.62 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148955 BEV CUSTER $13.00 PUBLICATIONS
148958 BLACK PROGRESS REVIEW $395.00 MESSAGE OF SUPPORT
148957 BLACKWELL WISSENSCHAFT $283.00 PUBLICATION
148958 BLOOMBERG L.P. $4,919.22 FINANCIAL MONITORING M.O.4-14-93
148959 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $27.243.80 ENGINEERING SERVICES MO 2.9.94&MO 9.27-95
148960 BREA COMMUNITY HOSPITAL $1.062.46 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148961 BUDGETINN $242.11 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148962 BUDGET JANITORIAL $4,329.50 JANITORIAL SERVICES NO 1-12-94
148953 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. $112.06 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
148964 BUSH&ASSOCIATES,INC. $7.298.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6.8-94
148965 CCI TECHNOLOGIES $826.84 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 12 1/95 PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 12/27/95 POSTING DATE 12/27/95
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
148966 CEM CORPORATION $155.48 LAB SUPPLIES
148957 CS COMPANY $4,175.95 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
148968 CALTROL,INC. 31,34Bb0 HARDWARE
148969 CALIF ASSOC.OF SAN.AGENCIES 5330.00 REGISTRATION
14897D CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $11".56 SERVICE AGREEMENT
148971 CALTEX PLASTICS,INC. $1,490.00 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
148972 CAMALI CORP. $1,256.10 SERVICE AGREEMENT
148973 CANNON EQUIPMENT WEST INC $137.60 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
148974 CANUS CORPORATION $377.16 FIBER OPTIC CABLE
148975 CARLETON ENGINEERS $390.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES-AIR QUALITY
148976 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $48.553.70 ENGINEERING SERVICES Pi-36&P2A2
148977 CATALINA CYLINDERS $1.634.62 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
X 148978 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $560.61 OFFICE FURNITURE
= 148979 CENTURY SAFETY INST.&SUPPLY $8.366.01 SAFETY SUPPLIES
148980 CERADYNE INC $457.87 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
w 148981 CHEM SERVICE INC. $215.74 LAB SUPPLIES
—I 148902 CLEMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL $20,773.86 CONSULTANT-LANDFILL PROJECT M07.31.95
148983 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $466.20 SERVICE AGREEMENT
�j 148984 COCAS#127 $125.20 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
IV 148985 COUCH&SONS $95.566.00 CONSTRUCTION 11-17-1
148906 COMBYTE USA INC. $3,775.44 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
148987 CONNELL GM PARTS I DIV. $122.43 TRUCK PARTS
1489M CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $2.187.65 ELECTRIC PARTS
148989 CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS $595.53 FREIGHT
148990 CONTEMPO COIN LAUNDRY $150.20 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
146991 CONTINENTAL EQUIPMENT&SUPPLY $332.96 TOOLS -
148992 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $4.175.15 ENGINE PARTS
148993 COSMOTRONIC $398.49 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
1489N COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $221.25 TRUCK PARTS
148995 COUNTERPART ENTERPRISES $123.17 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
1489% COUNTY INVESTMENTS II $125.20 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145997 COUNTY CLERK $25.00 EXEMPTION FEE
M998 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $810.49 ELECTRIC PARTS
148999 CRAZY SHIRTS INC. $1,059.31 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149000 CHARLES P.CROWLEY,CO. $586.01 INSTRUMENT PARTS
149001 SWRCB/SW FEES 510,000.00 ANNUAL FEE-WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS
149002 SWRBC/6PTCP FEES $11.000.00 ANNUAL FEE-BAT PROTECTION&TOXIC CLEANUP
149003 DAMES&MOORE $8.000.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES
142004 NA D'ARCY COMPANY $7.953.40 LAB SUPPLIES
149M DE LE JON ENTERPRISES $191.65 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149005 DELL COMPUTER CORP $212.727.60 COMPUTERS
149007 DEPT OF MOTOR VEHICLES $12.00 DMV RENEWAL
149008 DERLAN INC. 52,206.68 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149009 THE DIAMOND GROUP $4,000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
149010 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $21,101.04 SERVICE AGREEMENTS
149011 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $793.30 PAINT SUPPLIES
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 12/21/95 PAGE 3
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 1227195 POSTING DATE 12/27/95
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
149012 D'VALS SALES $382.48 FITTINGS
149013 ESP NORTH $1,654.45 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
149014 ECOANALYSIS,INC. $1,950.50 CONSULTING SERVICES
149015 ECOSYSTEMS EN'G B ANALYSIS $11,739.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
149010 ELECT AIR TOOL CO $205.45 MECHANICAL PARTS
149017 ENCHANTER,INC. $3,500.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5-24-95
149018 FILTER SUPPLY GO. $21.97 FILTERS
149019 FIRST CHOICE $1.303.90 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT
149020 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $1,281.80 IAS SUPPLIES
149021 FISIONS INSTRUMENTS $98.93 SERVICE AGREEMENT
149022 FLICKINGER CO $1,616.17 VALVE
149023 FORD SAUVAJOT MANAGEMENT GROUP $1,995.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
M 149024 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $71.86 PHOTO SUPPLIES
X 149025 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $725.30 PAINT SUPPLIES
149026 FRY'S ELECTRONICS $403.48 ELECTRONIC 8 COMPUTER SUPPLIES
149027 FUJI TRU COLOR INC. $321.12 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
-�4 149028 GMF SOUND INC $29.40 ELECTRIC PARTS
149029 GST,INC. $11,308.77 OFFICE SUPPLIES
t7
I 149030 GARDEN GROVE COMMUNITY CHURCH $1,724.04 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
LN 149031 GEMINI INDUSTRIES $1,152.42 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149032 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $3,989.07 ELECTRIC PARTS
149033 GENERAL OCEANICS,INC. $250.00 LAB SERVICES
149034 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $7,649.79 TELEPHONE SERVICES
149035 GERARD TILE CO.USA $4,077.41 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149036 GIERLICH-MITCHELL,INC. $171.09 PUMP PARTS
149037 GOUT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOC. $50.00 AWARD FEE
149038 GOVERNMENT INSTITUTES INC $955.00 PUBLICATIONS
149039 GRAPHIC CONTROLS $235.46 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
149040 GRASSY S.T.I. $3.096.51 ENGINE PARTS
149041 DGA CONSULTANTS $8,748.21 SURVEYING SERVICES MO&2&958 MO 6894
149042 DAVID R.GRIFFIN $117,774.65 LEGAL SERVICES-TECHITE PIPE M.O.9-14-94
149043 GULLIVER'S INC. $410.78 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
1490" GUNTHER ATHLETIC SERVICE $100.70 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149045 GEORGE T.HALL CO. $1,157.16 ELECTRIC PARTS
149046 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $1,356.14 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
149047 HATCH 8 KIRK,INC. $3,904.24 TRUCK PARTS
149048 HAWKINS ASSOCIATES $1,262.72 LAB EQUIPMENT
149049 PL HAWN CO,INC. $27.91 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
149050 HEALTH SCIENCE ASSOCIATES $1,750.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
149061 HILTL INC. $2,693.75 TOOL$
149052 HINCKLEY B SCHMITT $608.46 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149053 HOERBIGER CVS CALIF.,INC. $43.21 COMPRESSOR PARTS
149054 HOLIDAY SPA HEALTH CLIIUB $2,565.47 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149055 HOME DEPOT $975.19 SMALL HARDWARE
149056 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $607.02 PAINT SUPPLIES
149057 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO $2.009.25 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 12/21/95 PAGE4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 12/27/95 POSTING DATE 12127515
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
149058 IPCO SAFETY S4,125.84 SAFETY SUPPLIES
149059 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $17,646.28 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11.18.92
14906D INDUSTRIAL METAL SUPPLY CO. $956.48 STEEL
149061 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $157.12 CONNECTORS
149D62 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. $71.61 TRUCK PARTS
149063 INORGANIC VENTURES $377.72 LAB SUPPLIES
149064 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $1,097.06 BATTERIES
149065 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $76.84 WATER USE
149066 IRVINE SCI-TECH BOOKS $52.47 PUBLICATIONS
149067 ISLANDER MOTEL $199.74 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149068 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $160.88 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
149069 JAYS CATERING $485.75 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE
rn 149070 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $40.33 ELECTRIC PARTS
= 142071 JONES CHEMICALS,INC. $18,401.96 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE NO 4-26-95
149072 AMERICAN METAL BEARING CO $175.01 BEARINGS
LA 149073 KARS'ADVANCED MATERIALS,INC. $3.465.00 MACHINE TESTING
--1 149074 KERRY CONSULTING GROUP $13.361.05 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MO 11-15-95
149075 KIMMERLE BROS.INC. $106.65 MECHANICAL PARTS
C7 149076 KING BEARING,INC. $719.28 MACHINE SUPPLIES
1 149077 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $6.625.39 TOOLS
F
149078 LA PALMA INTER HOSPITAL $554.60 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149079 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY CO. $62.83 SAFETY SUPPLIES
149080 LAUNDERLAND $90.38 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149081 LAUNDERLAND $223.27 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149082 LAUNDERLAND E20517 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149083 LEACH CORP $937.95 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149084 LEE&RO CONSULTING ENGR. $30,450.73 ENGINEERING SERVICES NO&12.93&12.8.93
149085 K.P.LINDSTROM,INC. $2.33807 ENVIR.CONSULTING SERVICES MO 12.9-90
149086 MPS $468.56 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
149087 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $652,986.00 CONSTRUCTION PI-36.2
149088 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $84,013.00 CONSTRUCTION P212-2
149089 IRVINE MARMOT HOTEL $3.487.35 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149090 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS 5335.61 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
149091 MES COMPANY $2,299.39 REPAIR
149092 MICEL INC $249.74 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149093 MIDWAY MFG.B MACHINING $4.518.56 MECHANICAL REPAIRS
149094 MISSION INDUSTRIES $4.063.80 UNIFORM RENTALS
149095 MITCHELL INTERNATIONAL INC $533.36 PUBLICATIONS
149096 MOBILE HOSE AND HYDRAULIC $427.16 PUMP PARTS
149097 THE MOBILE STORAGE GROUP $2.614.46 CARGO CONTAINER
149098 MOTEL 6OD034-01-05-C $521.04 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
140D99 MOTION INDUSTRIES,INC. $246.19 PUMP PARTS
149100 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $2,89834 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
149101 NEWPORT HARBOR YACHT CLUB $117.17 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT '
149102 NEWARK ELECTRONICS $173.85 INSTRUMENT PARTS
149103 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $280.00 UTILITY SERVICE CONNECTION
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1221/95 PAGE 5
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 12l27/95 POSTING DATE 1227/95
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
149104 NEWPORT CTR MEDICAL $243.96 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149105 NICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY $6.765.94 LUBRICANTS/DIESEL FUEL
149106 NORTEL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS $442.00 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS
149107 O'BRIEN ENERGY SYSTEMS $39.883.66 AUTOMATE GENERATORS
149108 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $385.13 SAFETY GLASSES
149109 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $1.356.03 OFFICE SUPPLIES
149110 OFFICE PAVILIONS/INTERIOR RESOURCES $103.393.89 OFFICE FURNITURE REPAIRS
149111 OLD SPAGHETTI FACTORY $574.17 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149112 OLYMPIC CONTROLS INC $89.96 REPAIR
140113 OMEGA CORPORATION $187.50 SECURITY SYSTEM REPAIRS
149114 ORANGE COUNTY FAIR&EXPO CTR $281.61 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
m 149115 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $202.74 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
>K 149118 ORANGE COURIER $222.75 COURIER SERVICES
= 149117 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. $496.69 FITTINGS
pp 149118 ORRICK HERRINGTON&SUTCLIFFE $3,000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
149119 OXYGEN SERVICE $1.536.49 SPECIALTY GASES
149120 COUNTY OF ORANGE $15.00 ADMINISTRATIVE FEES
L7 149121 PSSI $1,969.65 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION
/ 149122 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $1.232.66 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
149123 PACIFIC PARTS $32,728.92 INSTRUMENT PARTS
149124 PACIFIC BELL $1.389.72 TELEPHONE SERVICES
149125 PAK WEST $62.56 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
149128 PARAGON CABLE $62.56 CABLE SERVICES
149127 PARKER HANNIFIN k2 $2.979.60 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149128 PARKHOUSE TIRE,INC. $830.65 TRUCK PARTS
149129 PARTS UNLIMITED $440.94 TRUCK PARTS
149130 R.F.PAULUS,INC. $15.175.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
149131 PEABODY $716.38 PUMP PARTS
149132 PEERLESS WIPING MATERIALS $721.93 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
149133 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $8.280.64 REIMS.PETTY CASH,TRAINING&TRAVEL
149134 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $114,198.50 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3-29-95
149135 PINATA FOODS $2,735.41 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149136 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS $1,920.00 CONSULTING SERVICES
149137 PITNEY BOWES $1.778.00 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS
149138 POLY ENTERPRISES INC $99B.69 SAFETY
149139 POLYMETRICS,INC. $1,262.76 UIBSUPPLIES
149140 POLYPURE,INC. $27,950.04 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3.11-92
149141 POWER SYSTEMS TESTING CO. $1,249.00 ELECTRIC PARTS
149142 PROJECT MOMT INSTITUTE(PM0 $156.75 PUBLICATIONS
149143 PROMINENT FLUID CONTROL,INC. $799.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL
149144 PUBLIC FINANCIAL MGMT.,INC. $101906.50 FINANCIAL CONSULTING SERVICES MO 7.31-95
149145 PRYOR REPORT $195.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING
149146 PUMPING SOLUTIONS $677.24 PUMP PARTS
149147 CUP LAMINATES,INC. $1,387.82 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149148 QUESTRON CORP. $BB0.00 LAB SUPPLIES
149149 RD SYSTEMS $75.00 MONITOR REPAIR
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE IM1195 PAGE 6
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 12/27/95 POSTING DATE 1227195
WARRANT NO.
149150 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $1.670.38 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS
149151 R&R INSTRUMENTS $83.35 ELECTRIC PARTS
149152 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO. $153.03 LAB SUPPLIES
149153 RAYNE WATER SYSTEMS $824.59 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149154 REBIS $1.811.73 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
149155 RED WING SHOES $113.78 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES
149166 REMEDYTEMP $962.37 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
149167 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $1,569.00 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
149158 RENOLD INC. $557.03 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
149159 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $622.53 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
149160 SASCO ELECTRIC $6.255.00 CONTRACT SERVICES
149161 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTL $82.779.65 OCEAN MONITORING MO 6.8.94&MO 6-28-95
T*1 149162 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $100.36 SPECIALTY GASES
x 149163 SCOTT WILLIAM J. $317.07 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
2 149164 SEA COAST DESIGNS $937.43 LAB SUPPLIES
'--� 149165 CITY OF SEAL BEACH $376.60 WATER USE
DO
149166 SELECT CIRCUITS $801.46 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
--1 149167 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $792.40 TOOLS
ty 149168 SHEPARD BROTHERS $540.76 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149169 SHURELUCK SALES $8,025.05 TOOLSMARDWARE
149170 SIEMON,LARSEN,&MARSH $6,497.08 CONTRACT SERVICE
149171 SMITH-EMERY CO. $912.00 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-13-94
149172 THE SMITH GROUP $5,213.00 CONTRACT SERVICE
149173 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. $45,782.30 POWER
149174 SO.CAL GAS.CO. $22,514.84 NATURAL GAS
149175 SOUTHWEST WHOLESALE NURSERY $19,650.00 CONTRACT SERVICE
149176 STAMEN Z.SPASSOFF P.E. $12,000.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES
149177 SPICERS PAPER $91.29 OFFICE SUPPLIES
149176 STARNA CELLS,INC. $533.66 LAB SUPPLIES
149179 STATEK CORP $2.150.04 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149180 SUMMIT STEEL $962.64 METAL
149181 SUNSET ENVIRONMENTAL $1,207.14 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149182 SUPELCO,INC. $223.49 LAB SUPPLIES
149183 SUPER ICE CORP. $80.22 LAB SUPPLIES
149184 SUPER POWER PRODUCTS $517.20 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
149185 SUPER SOLDER SERVICES $110.71 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149186 SYSTEMS 810 INDUSTRIES INC. $104.68 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149187 SYMCAS $2.436.25 CONSULTANT
149186 TCH ASSOCIATES $3.292.22 LAB SUPPLIES
149169 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $1.002.62 ELECTRIC CART PARTS
149190 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $701.31 MECHANICAL PARTS
149191 TIME MOTION TOOLS $86.76 TOOLS
149192 TOLOINC $555.23 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149193 TONYS LOCK&SAFE SERVICE $167.95 LOCKS&KEYS
149194 TRAFFIC CONTROL ENGINEERING $1,440.00 ENGINEERING SERVICE
149195 TRISTAR $220.21 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 12/21/95 PAGE 7 `
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 12/27/95 POSTING DATE 12/27/95
WARRANTNO. VENDOR
149196 TRUCK 6 AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $260.04 TRUCK PARTS
149197 TRUCK PARTS SUPPLY $28.11 TRUCK PARTS
149198 TRUESDAIL LABS $65.00 LAB SERVICES
149199 JG TUCKER 8 SON,INC. $4,669.35 INSTRUMENT PARTS
149200 TUSTIN DODGE $123.65 TRUCK PARTS
149201 TWINING LABORATORIES $13,695.07 SOIL TESTING M.0.7-13.94
149202 U.S.AUTO GLASS CENTERS $29.95 TRUCK PARTS
149203 US POSTAL SERVICE $132.41 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149204 US POSTAL SERVICE $143.23 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149205 US POSTAL SERVICE $130.29 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149206 US POSTAL SERVICE $448.20 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149207 UNISOURCEWOR BUTLER PAPER $335.40 OFFICE SUPPLIES
149208 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $583.33 PARCEL SERVICES
m 149209 VWR SCIENTIFIC $443.53 LAB SUPPLIES
X 149210 VAUN CORPORATION $644.09 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
2
� 149211 VILLAGE NURSERIES $13.08 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES
149212 VORTEX INDUSTRIES $325.24 BUILDING REPAIRS
-1 149213 WACKENHUT CORP. $7.193.76 CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS
y 149214 WARNER CENTER ASSOCIATION $204,57 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
I 149215 WARRINGTON $17.50 SERVICE AGREEMENT
V 149216 WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION $1,473.68 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT COURSES
149217 WECO INDUSTRIES,INC. $13,964.40 CHEMICALS
149218 WESTERN SKIES MOBILE HOME PARK $250.84 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149219 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $17.665.35 CAUSTIC SODA MO 8-23-95
149220 WESTERN SWITCHES $66.40 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
149221 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $232.20 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
149222 WESCO 52,386.30 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
149223 JUDITH A.WILSON $72.54 REIMBURSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE
149224 WINONICS(BREA) $237.60 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
149225 WOLFE AND ASSOCIATES,INC. $1,305.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
149228 ROURKE,WOODRUFF 8 SPRADUN $76.348.06 LEGAL SERVICES NO 7.26-95
149227 XEROX CORP. $195.05 COPIER LEASES
149228 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $715.83 LAB SUPPLIES
149229 ZYMARK CORP. $179.14 LAB EQUIPMENT
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 1227195 $2.628.999.39
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 122U95 PAGES
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 12127195 POSTING DATE 1227/95
SUMMARY AMOUNT
01 OPER FUND 53,000.00
#2 OPER FUND $84.76
#2 CAP FAC FUND $1.028.74
#3 OPER FUND $18,259.97
03 CAP FAC FUND $129,533.26
05 OPER FUND $648.54
#6 CAP FAC FUND $62.31
#7 OPER FUND $2.598.94
#7 CAP FAC FUND $40,020.76
#11 OPER FUND $11,119.94
X #11 CAP FAC FUND $97,260.00
_ 014 OPER FUND $291.50
#14 CAP FAC FUND 819,650.00
CO #586 OPER FUND $16.75
-1 4596 CAP FAC FUND $25,665.05
C7 #687 OPER FUND $211.28
I #7&14 OPER FUND $15.83
OD JTOPERFUND $747.037.33
CORF $1,311.228.89
SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $9,225.20
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $212,140.44
$2.628.999.39
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 01105NS PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 01/10/96 POSTING DATE 01I70/96
WARRAKTNO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
149250 AGTECHCOMPANY $59.271.65 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9.91
149259 ARK TECHNOLOGIES $6,000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
149260 A-Z LOGIC SYSTEMS $66.80 LAB SUPPLIES
149261 ACORN CONSULTING $2,795.00 CONSULTING SERVICES
149262 AIR COLD SUPPLY,INC. $29.21 AIR CONDITIONER REPAIRS
149263 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $18,322.00 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.0.8-9A9
149264 ALADDIN HOUSE $623.90 WINDOW BLINDS
149265 AMERIDATA $4.851.11 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
149266 AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION $320.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING
149267 ANIXTER-DISTRIBUTION $722.58 COMPUTER SUPPLIES
149268 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $1,714.01 NOTICES&ADS
149269 APPLE ONE $704.00 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
m 149270 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) S37,523.94 COMPUTER PARTS
X 149271 ARROWHEAD ELECTRIC CORP. $236.32 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
= 149272 E S BABCOCK&SONS INC $1.110.00 LAB ANALYSIS
149273 BANK OF AMERICA $393.42 BANKING CHARGES
149274 BARNES&NOBLE BOOKS $800.80 TECHNICAL PUBLICATIONS
-4 149275 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $1,015.00 BATTERIES
R1 149276 BAUER COMPRESSOR $8.020.38 COMPRESSOR PARTS
149277 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $4,213.99 LAB SUPPLIES
~ 149278 BEAR STATE PUMP&EQUIPMENT $108.21 PUMP PARTS
149279 A BIEDERMAN INC $944.81 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
149280 BIO-GRO DIVISION $42,435.61 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO4-26-95
149281 BONA-RUES $140.78 TRUCK PARTS
149282 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $13,206.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES NO 1-12-94
149283 BNI BOOKS $069.51 BOOKS
149284 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH INC. $206.84 LAB SUPPLIES
149285 CALTROL,INC. $574.55 HARDWARE
149286 CALIF ASSOC.OF SAN.AGENCIES $495.00 REGISTRATION
149287 CALTEX PLASTICS,INC. $228.40 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
149288 CAMALI CORP. $400.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
149289 CANUS CORPORATION $54,641.10 FIBER OPTIC CABLE
149290 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $21.574.15 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-33.2,PI-38&P2-43
149291 CASI RUSCO INC. $605.06 SAFETY SUPPLIES
149292 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $1.214.79 OFFICE FURNITURE
149293 CERFNET $37.40 COMPUTER SERVICES
149294 CHEMWEST INC. $5.00 REFUND MAIL FEES
149295 CLARKE CONTRACTING CO $42,682.50 CONSTRUCTION 7-14-2
149296 COLICHANDSONS $60,796.90 CONSTRUCTION M-044
149297 COUCH&SONS $122.640.00 CONSTRUCTION 11-07-1
149298 COMMUNICATION DEV.ASSOC. $2,250.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
149299 COMMUNICATIONS PERFORMANCE GROUP $17.860.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
149300 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $2.639,88 PUMP PARTS
149301 COMPUSERVE $166.13 COMPUTER SERVICES
149302 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $2,469.09 ELECTRICPARTS
149303 CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS $131.33 FREIGHT
FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 01/05/96 PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 01110M POSTING DATE 01/10196
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
149304 CONTINENTAL LAB PRODUCTS INC. $3,088.81 LAB SUPPLIES
149305 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $951.71 ENGINE PARTS
1493GS CHARLES P.CROWLEY,CO. $19.08 INSTRUMENT PARTS
149307 DAVPS BICYCLES,INC. $344.22 BIKE REPAIRS
149308 DELL COMPUTER CORP. $34,100.32 COMPUTER PARTS
149309 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $6.941 AS ANALYST
149310 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $1,035.89 PAINT SUPPLIES
149311 OVALS SALES $282.49 FITTINGS
149312 E.C.S. $344.00 PUBLICATIONS
149313 ESP NORTH $473.17 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
149314 EASTMAN,INC. $3,268A9 OFFICE SUPPLIES
149315 EDWARDS HIGH VACUUM INTER. $134.88 LAB SUPPLIES
149316 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $867.70 LAB SERVICES
m 149317 FMC CORPORATION $91,487.40 HYDROGEN PEROXIDE MO9-14-94
X
2 149318 FASTFRAME OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $139.00 AWARDS FRAMING
149319 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $220.70 AIR FREIGHT
to
149320 FILTERLINE CORP. $613.25 FILTERS
149321 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $257.54 FILTERS
m 149322 FIRST CO B/OR NORTHERN DIST. $525.99 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
I 149323 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $943.10 LAB SUPPLIES
N 149324 FISONS INSTRUMENTS $11,T72.61 LAB SOFTWARE LICENSES
149325 CLIFFORD A FORKERT $8.145.50 SURVEYING SERVICES MO 6-8-95
149328 FRY'S ELECTRONICS $394.14 ELECTRONIC B COMPUTER SUPPLIES
149327 GST,INC. $18.660.69 OFFICE SUPPLIES
149328 GARRATT-CALLAHiN COMPANY $71.12 CHEMICALS
149329 GAUGE REPAIR SERVICE $368.68 INSTRUMENT PARTS
149330 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $137.87 ELECTRIC PARTS
149331 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1,124.81 TELEPHONE SERVICES
149332 GIERUCHMITCHELL,INC. $8.366.81 PUMP PARTS
149333 GOVT CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENT $250.00 REGISTRATION
149334 WIN GRAINGER INC. $191.24 COMPRESSOR PARTS
149335 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $422.08 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
149336 GRASSY S.T.I. $4.282.76 ENGINE PARTS
149337 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC WHOLESALE $456.89 PLANT AUTOMATION
149338 DGA CONSULTANTS $18,617.15 SURVEYING SERVICES MO8.23-958 MO 6-8-94
149339 HACH COMPANY $1,077.84 LAB SUPPLIES
149340 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $1,480.00 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
149341 HATCH&KIRK,INC. $1.255.99 TRUCK PARTS
149342 PL HAWN CO,INC. $878.40 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
149343 HELPMATES PERSONNEL SERVICES $802.56 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
149344 VICKI HESTON PERSONNEL SERVICE $8.384.42 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
149346 HILT,INC. $1,664.08 TOOLS
149346 HOERBIGER CVS CALIF.,INC. $271.92 COMPRESSOR PARTS
149347 HOLMES B HARMER INC. $19,585.61 ENGINEERING SERVICES 2-145R2 MO9-1F94 r
149348 HOME DEPOT $368.16 SMALL HARDWARE
149349 SOUTHWEST SCIENTIFIC,INC. $1.480.49 METER PARTS
FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE DIM5/96 PAGES
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 01/10/96 POSTING DATE 01/10/96
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
149350 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $1,073.50 PAINT SUPPLIES
149351 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $18,639.75 WATER USE
149352 HYCLONE LABORATORIES INC. $910.66 LAB SUPPLIES
149353 HYDROTEXINC. $1,632.16 TRANSMISSION FLUID
149354 IPCO SAFETY $1.435.91 SAFETY SUPPLIES
149355 INDUSTRIAL STEAM $1,393.38 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
149356 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $5.54 WATER USE
149357 JAMISON ENGINEERING $8,361.90 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
149358 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $836.57 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
149359 JAYS CATERING $461.64 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE
149360 JOBS AVAILABLE $170.00 NOTICES BADS
149361 JOHNSON CONTROLS INC. $956.32 ELECTRIC PARTS
m 149362 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $825.13 ELECTRIC PARTS
X 149363 JONES CHEMICALS.INC. $4,992.76 SODIUM 14YPOCHLORITE MO 4-26415
.�. 149364 KALLEEN'S COMPUTER PRODUCTS $331.50 COMPUTER SUPPLIES
Ib 149365 FRANCES L.KALUZNY S7,320.00 HUMAN RESOURCES CONSULTANT
149366 KEMIRON PACIFIC,INC. $66.867.24 FERRIC CHLORIDE MO 9.27-95
149367 KING BEARING,INC. $954.51 MACHINE SUPPLIES
fn 149368 KLEINFELDER $194.95 GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTING SERVICES
W 149369 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $6,870.80 TOOLS
149370 LEADERSHIP DIRECTORIES INC. $629.26 SUBSCRIPTIONS
149371 LEE 8 RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC. S4,582.08 ENGINEERING SERVICES
149372 LEWCO ELECTRIC $162.19 TRUCK PARTS
149373 SOCO-LYNCH CORP. $537.03 JANITORIAL SERVICES
149374 MEC ANALYTICAL SYSTEMS INC. $9.968.00 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING
149375 MPS $926.22 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
149376 MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY CORP. $887.22 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
149377 MARATHON ELECTRIC $745.05 ELECTRIC PARTS
149378 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $399.25 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
149379 MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. $732.56 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
149350 MIDWAY MFG.B MACHINING $875.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS
149381 MISSION INDUSTRIES $2,379.41 UNIFORM RENTALS
149382 MORTON SALT $1,042.22 SALT
149353 MOTION INDUSTRIES,INC. $227.25 PUMP PARTS
149364 NATIONAL INFORMATION DATA $503.95 PUBLICATION
149385 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $82.11 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
149386 NEWARK ELECTRONICS $58.69 INSTRUMENT PARTS
149387 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $40.58 WATER USE
149388 91 EXPRESS LANES $970.00 TRANSPONDERS 8 DEPOSIT
149389 OFFICIAL AIRLINE GUIDE 5549.80 SUBSCRIPTIONS
149390 OLSTEN STAFFING SERVICES $3.472.00 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
149391 ON-LINE EKECTRONICS $63.60 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
149392 ON TECHNOLOGY $007.00 SOFTWARE
149393 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $339.27 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES '
149394 ORANGE COURIER $89.10 COURIER SERVICES
149395 ORANGE VALVE 6 FITTING CO. $1.208.19 FITTINGS
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 01/0SM6 PAGE 4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 01/10/96 POSTING DATE 01/10M6
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
149396 OXYGEN SERVICE E1,28LBB SPECIALTY GASES
149397 COUNTY OF ORANGE $60.00 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICE FEES
149398 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $18.647.75 WORKERS COMP REIMBURSEMENT
149399 COUNTY OF ORANGE 5238.00 INSPECTION LABOR
149400 PACIFIC PARTS $53,598.08 INSTRUMENT PARTS
149401 PACIFIC BELL $15.86 TELEPHONE SERVICES
149402 PAINE WEBBER $61.394.69 COP REMARKETING FEES
149403 PARAGON CABLE E36.78 CABLE SERVICES
149404 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $2.240.41 REIMS.PETTY CASH,TRAINING&TRAVEL
149405 PHOTRON USA E917.27 LAB SUPPLIES
149406 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $104.986.80 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3-29-95
149407 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS $19,433.31 CONSULTING SERVICE
TTl 149408 POLYPURE,INC. $23.376.47 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92
X 149409 POWER DESIGN $943.90 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS
= 14941D HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $112.00 ICE FOR SAMPLES
o--� 149411 PUMPING SOLUTIONS INC $808.90 PUMPS
W
149/72 PUTZMEISTER,INC. E847.97 PUMP PARTS
149413 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $154.95 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS
Rl 149414 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $2,062.75 TRASH REMOVAL
r
149415 RED WING SHOES $282.74 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES
149418 REMEDY TEMP E2,875.72 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
149417 RM MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL ANDIOR RITTAL E281.14 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
148418 RODNEY-HUNT CO EB,264.43 HEADWORKS REPAIR
149419 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS E847.66 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
149420 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $196.05 TOOLS
149421 SHURELUCK SALES $5.363.81 TOOLSIRARDWARE
149422 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO. E197.84 LAB SUPPLIES
149423 SOCOASTAIROUALTTY $16.654.92 PERMIT FEES
149424 SOUTH COAST WATER $160.00 LAB SUPPLIES
149425 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. $61.180.65 POWER
149426 SO.CALIFORNIA MARINE INST. E8D0.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
149427 STANG INDUSTRIAL PRODS. $638.66 HARDWARE
149428 STARNA CELLS,INC. E973.B6 LAB SUPPLIES
149429 STATE STREET BANK $4,842.02 COP TRUSTEE SERVICES
149430 SUNSET INDUSTRIAL PARTS E271.87 PUMP PARTS
149431 SUPELCO,INC. $223.41 LABSUPPUES
149432 SUPER CHEM CORP. $1.338.85 CHEMICALS
149433 SUPER POWER PRODUCTS $352.04 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
149434 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $98.39 ELECTRIC CART PARTS
149435 TECHNOMIC PUBLISHING CO. E292.00 PUBLICATIONS
149436 TELEDYNE ANALYTICAL $3.556.92 INSTRUMENT PARTS
149437 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $569,89 MECHANICAL PARTS
149438 TONYS LOCK&SAFE SERVICE $198,86 LOCKS&KEYS
149439 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. E165AI TRUCK PARTS
149440 TRUCK PARTS SUPPLY $224.43 TRUCK PARTS
149441 JG TUCKER&SON,INC. E11,234A9 INSTRUMENT PARTS
FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 01105M PAGES
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 01/10/96 POSTING DATE 01I10196
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
149442 UNISOURCE&IOR BUTLER PAPER $1,078.26 OFFICE SUPPLIES
149443 VWR SCIENTIFIC $524.97 LAB SUPPLIES
149444 VARIAN ASSOCIATES INC $643.96 LAB SUPPLIES
149445 VOSSLER&COMPANY $266.53 VALVE PARTS
149446 WACKENHUT CORP. $8,996.51 CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS
149447 WAL-CON CONSTRUCTION CO. $78.194.11 CONSTRUCTION 5-37-3
149448 WAXIE $2,D51.99 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
149449 WECO INDUSTRIES,INC. $14.083.16 CHEMICAL SUPPLIES
149450 WEST COAST INSTRUMENTS $247A6 GAUGE
149451 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $20.907.15 CAUSTIC SODA MO 8.23-95
149452 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $3.547.66 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
149453 WESCO - $441.10 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
149454 JUDITH A.WILSON $89.09 REIMBURSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE
m 149455 XEROX CORP. $994.02 COPIER LEASES
x 149456 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $913.20 LAB SUPPLIES
141N57 JOHNSON YOKOGAWA CORP. $2,635.99 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
A
--i TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 1/10/98 &1,510,638.32
m
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 01/05/96 PAGES
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 01/10/96 POSTING DATE 01110/96
SUMMARY AMOUNT
#1 OPER FUND $1,459.38
#1 CONSTR FUND $8.069.26
#2 OPER FUND $6,426.02
#2 CAP FAC FUND $19.585.61
#2 CONSTR FUND $20,620.74
#3 OPER FUND $48.363.12
#3 CAP FAC FUND $2.020.00
03 CONSTR FUND $18.782.13
#5 OPER FUND $13,657.87
#5 CONSTR FUND $4,350.51
96 OPER FUND $374.37
m 96 CONSTR FUND 52,218.86
X 07 OPER FUND $3,893.57
z #7 CAP FAC FUND $42,700.00
97 CONSTR FUND $4,079.87
011 OPER FUND $1.371.72
#11 CAP FAC FUND $125,302.73
m #11 CONSTR FUND $2,749.25
013 OPER FUND $78.80
013 CONSTR FUND $76.15
#14 CAP FAC FUND $17.60
#14 CONSTR FUND $447.92
0586 OPER FUND $2.653.22
0586 CAP FAC FUND $78,194.11
#687 OPER FUND $1,960.71
#7814 OPER FUND $5.169.93
JT OPER FUND $590.262.64
CORF $260.472.07
SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $18,647.75
J7 DIST WORKING CAPITAL $225.832.58
51,510,838.92
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
January 18, 1996
phone:
[714)962 2411
Dear Community Member:
mailing address:
P.O. Box B127
Feuntain Valle,.CA The County Sanitation Districts is beginning a new strategic-planning
92726.6127 process, the results of which will form the framework of operations for the
.wet address: next five to ten years. As part of that planning process, we must make
1hunrtenl ValleyCA several important policy decisions, including whether or not to build a second
927OB7O,B ocean ouffall, how to respond to the increasing demand for water
reclamation, and the impact of the 301 (h) waiver.
Member These and other important issues will be discussed at the Boards of
Ag°"u•° Directors first quarterly Strategic Planning Workshop from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m.
Saturday, January 27, at the Districts' office, 10844 Ellis Ave., Fountain
Cities Valley. 1 urge you to attend and hear directly from staff and others how the
Anaheim challenges we face and the policy decisions before us will impact our overall
Bras
Busne Perk operations.
Cypress
Fountain valley
Fullerton Jerry King, a consultant specializing in environmental planning and policy,
Huntington Beech Irvine and water resource development and protection, will be our guest speaker.
Beach
Le Habra Mr. King, four-time chairman of the Regional Water Quality Control Board,
Le Palms
Loa Alamitos will give us his insights from a regional perspective into our critical policy
Newport Beach issues.
Orange
Placentia
na
Beat
a An.
Santa A As a member of the community, your input into our strategic-planning
S
Sta"tan process is vital. Please join us on the 27th. A meeting agenda is attached.
Tustin
Ville Perk
lbrba Linda. Please respond to Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications,
County of Orange 962-2411, ext. 2050, if you will be attending.
9eniter, Districts Sincerely,
Casa Me" /
Garden Greve
Midway City
Water Districts
Donald F. McIntyre
Irvine Perch General Manager
J:\W PDOC\TUCHMAN V AN2796
A Public Wastewater and Environmental Management Agency Committed to Protecting the Environment Since 1954