Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-11-15 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA November 9, 1995 gb41e1: NOTICE OF MEETING n1a1 ssz-2a mN"mg�: Po.Boa 8127 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS Fe9292722M127 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS streat address: NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 1pBg4 E Oe Foveain"Shen EA OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Valley, 92JG8-7Cte WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 15, 1995 - 7:30 P.M. DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES Member Agendas 10844 Ellis Avenue • Fountain Valley, Califomia 92708 Cites Anent. The Regular Meeting of the Joint Boards of Directors of County Brad Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange B"and Pan:Gyprass County, California, will be held at the above location, time and date. Fountain Ualley F Patterson Hurrtingwn Basch "re La Habra Le Palma Boar ecr ry Los Alamitos Newport each Dredge Placenva Sed,Ana seal Beacn Tentatively-Scheduled Upcoming Meetings Stand, Tosa' Valle Park AD HOC COMMITTEE RE - Wednesday, November 15, 1995 Yorbs Lrnda LANDFILL ACQUISITION at 4:00 pm Coomy of Crange STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday, November 15, 1995, Sanitery Distndla, at 5:30 pm Costa Mesa Gallen Grove AD HOC COMMITTEE RE - Wednesday, December 13, 1995 M"way Gry LANDFILL ACQUISITION at 4:00 pm Water Disaricts Irvine Ranch STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday, December 13, 1995, at 5:30 pm A Public wastewater and Environmental Management Agency Committe0 ro Pro[econg[de Environment Since 1954 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS AI ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 12044 ELLIS AVENUE VO.BOX 0127 F NTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92729.8127 n'11962.2.11 JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES Executive Committee Meetings Joint Board Meetings November Nov 9, 1995 Nov 15, 1995 December None Scheduled Dec 13, 1995 January Jan 17, 1996 Jan 24, 1996 February Feb 21, 1996 Feb 28, 1996 March Mar 20, 1996 Mar 27, 1996 April Apr 17, 1996 Apr 24, 1996 May May 15, 1996 May 22, 1996 June Jun 19, 1996 Jun 26, 1996 July Jul 17, 1996 Jul 24, 1996 August None Scheduled Aug 28, 1996 September Sep 18, 1996 Sep 25, 1996 October Oct 16, 1996 Oct 23, 1996 November None Scheduled Nov 20, 1996 .. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA f S• November 9, 1995 phone: (7141962-2411 To the Chair and Members mailing address: of the Joint Boards of Directors P.O.Box 8127 Fountain 72"127 Subject: Board Letter aveat address: 10e44 Ellis Avenue F ratan valley,M The following is an update on some of the things that are happening at the Districts. 5270 7015 If you have questions on any of the items, please give me a call. Tour of Plant No. 2 aeanna s For the Directors who were unable to attend the tour in August, there will be another tour on Saturday, November 18. We will meet at 10:30 a.m. at Plant No. 1 for brunch, then board the bus for a tour of Plant No. 2 that will last approximately 1-1/2 cities hours. Please call Clarice Marcin at 962-2411, extension 3001 to make a Anaheim reservation. era Scene Perk Cypress Fountain Valley Districts Consolidation Fullerton Huntington Beach vine At the September and October Steering Committee meetings, the staff provided Le Habra status reports on this effort. Attached are copies of the memos outlining the key La Palma policy issues and the process which will need to be followed. In order to analyze all .p Alamitch the relevant financial detail required b the LAFCO application, a stud 1s current! NeLee A Beach q Y PP Y Y Orange underway. It will include: a study of underlying debt; regional impacts; contractual Placentae relationships and options for transferring these obligations; and an assessment of Santa An. ch possible LAFCO conditions which could be laced upon the application. Preliminary seal teach P P P PP Sian= findings will be reported at the January 1996 Executive Committee meeting. A Tustin complete analysis will be presented at the February Executive Committee meeting. Wile Perk Y.-be Linda 9�At the FebruaryBoard Meeting, the Directors can determine if and how it wishes to proceed with Consolidation. If an application is filed with LAFCO in March 1996, it County of orange will take approximately four months to process the application, hold the required public hearing and make a final decision. sanitary Districts costs Mesa Benchmarkino Ge,den Grove Midway City As you know, the Districts will be completing a joint agency benchmarking study with water Districte East Bay Municipal Utility District and the Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District on the costs to operate a wastewater treatment plant. This study is being frems Ranch performed to provide a comparison of joint operating costs and operation and maintenance performance measures and will compare the three organizations' department and division costs of their joint operating budgets on a cost-per-million- gallons of wastewater treatment. The study will cost approximately$60,000 and will be shared equally by the three agencies. A Public wastavater and Environmental Management Agency Committed to Protecting the Environment Since 1954 x Chair and Members of the Joint Boards of Directors Page 2 November 9, 1995 In addition to this study, an aggressive internal performance measurement and benchmarking effort will be underway by December 1995. An analyst working for Judy Wilson will be assigned to work with all of the departments to identify critical factors for success and to prepare data sets which can effectively monitor these factors and trend Districts' performance. In addition, a variety of other agencies will be surveyed to establish appropriate benchmarking for all departments. Our goal is to have these performance measures in place for the adoption of the FY '96297 budget and have the staff trained to monitor and review this data. In FY '96-'97, regular reports will be prepared using this information so that the Boards will have timely information in a user-friendly format. A status report on this internal program will be prepared for the January FAHR Committee, Strategic Plan Workshops The first of the quarterly Strategic Plan Workshops is scheduled for January 27, 1996 between 9 a.m. and noon at the Districts' Administrative Offices. A continental breakfast will be available. The workshops are being held to provide in-depth staff presentations and seek direction on policy issues affecting the development of the new Strategic Plan. I am urging that all Directors attend these workshops. OCIP Update We have been notified that the County filed its Second Amended Complaint on October 25, 1995. The Court subsequently informed the parties that it expected Merrill Lynch to file its response within ten days. Merrill Lynch made an emergency motion on October 27, requesting an additional twenty days to file its response. The Court denied the motion, but agreed to provide Merrill Lynch five additional working days to file its response. As a result, Merrill Lynch's motion to dismiss must now be filed on or before November 10, 1995. A hearing on the Motion to Dismiss has been set for December 1 subject to receipt of the County opposition to the Motion to Dismiss on or before November 20 and Merrill Lynch's reply to the County's opposition on or before November 28. We will continue to update you. If you have questions, please contact Blake Anderson directly. CASA Update on the Legislature's Final Report Attached is an update from CASA on the Final Legislative Report, addressing the Govemofs actions and CASA's position on each bill. If you would like a copy of the actions of the Legislature, please contact Jean Tappan. Chair and Members of the Joint Boards of Directors Page 3 November 9, 1995 New Training and Development Program The Training Advisory(employee) Group, along with the new Training Manager, are in the process of developing procedures for establishing the philosophy, purpose and assigning responsibility for the Districts' training and development program. Attached is a draft procedure for your information. Excess Capacity Charge We have received several letters on the Excess Capacity Charge from state legislators, state administrative agencies and the Orange County Business Council. We know, too, that several Board members have received requests to appear before the State's so-called "Red Team" on November 13; we are working on a presentation for that meeting. A separate meeting is scheduled on November 17 to discuss this with CaIEPA and the County permit processing people. FEMA Funds The October Board Letter included a letter to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) requesting federal and state disaster aid to repair damage caused by the January 1995 storms. On November 6, Disaster Survey Reports (DSR) for FEMA and the California Office of Emergency Services were signed. The signed DSRs total approximately$260,000. In addition, the Districts will be able to file appeals for reimbursement of excess energy used during the high Flows, as well as the permanent repairs to the Ocean Outfall. We will keep you posted on the status of these anticipated funds. Update on Due Diligence re Landfill Issues Staff is continuing the due diligence on the issues involved with the proposed purchase of the County of Orange landfill system. Since my last report, two meetings have occurred with staff of both agencies, one on November 1 and the other November 9. A meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee is scheduled for November 15 to update the Committee on our findings. Survey of Californians' Attitudes Toward Water Storage and Supply Last week I attended the annual meeting of the Southern California Water Committee. This Committee is committed to informing the public on water issues, and has set a goal of developing an effective board-based consensus supporting the need to meet our region's water requirements. Attached is a letter from the Southern California Water Committee, Inc. with an attached copy of the attitude survey that may be of interest. r Chair and Members of the Joint Boards of Directors Page 4 November 9, 1995 Appeal of CalOSHA Citations On January 5, 1996, the Districts will appear before the California Occupation Safety and Health Appeals Board. The hearing will provide the Districts an opportunity to contest the CalOSHA citations resulting from the February 1, 1994 accident at Plant 2 involving Pascal & Ludwig Engineers. We will keep you informed on the status of the appeal. Presentation to the Orange County Division of League of California Cities We have been asked by the OC Division of LCC to make a presentation on our efforts towards the purchase of the landfill system at their January 11, 1996 meeting. This provides an excellent outreach opportunity for us, assuming we are still pursuing this issue at that time! SCAQMD Plant Inspections Attached is a memo dated October 31, 1995 on the results of SCAOMD inspections to verify compliance with our air quality permit conditions at both treatment plants. The outcome is a win-win for both SCAQMD and the Districts. Update on Personal Computers Purchase Steve Hovey has indicated that the purchase of the approved 60 personal computers through the state's purchasing program has resulted in a savings of$11,473. The Directors authorized the purchase of the computers for a total amount not to exceed $208,900. The actual cost was $197,427. Willful Destruction of Property On Wednesday, November 1, at 5 a.m., a loss of signal was reported at Plant No. 2. It was traced to a failure in a fiber optics panel located 8 feet up in the basement of Boiler Room B. Twenty-four fiber optic cables had been cut, removed, and the connectors removed. Samples of the truncated cable ends were sent to Cards Laboratory in Garden Grave for analysis to determine if it was possible that this could have been the result of rodent damage. Today we received the lab report which has concluded that the failure appeared to be caused by mechanical pulling and snipping of cables. The lab, using a JEOL digital scanning electron microscope, found no evidence of rodent damage. An investigation is underway with Operations taking the lead. It should be noted that the signal was restored by November 2, and the cabinet has been changed to a secured, locked cabinet. We will keep you informed about the progress of this investigation. s Chair and Members of the Joint Boards of Directors Page 5 November 9, 1995 Change in Meeting Schedule for November As a final note, I want to remind you that the November meeting schedule has changed, as follows: Ad Hoc Committee re Landfill Issues November 15 at 4 p.m. Steering Committee November 15 at 5:30 p.m. Joint Boards November 15 at 7:30 p.m. Respectfully, Donald F. Intyre General Manager DFMM a:rvv MLiMBOMOLIMI��!%. Enclosures: Two memos, dated September 27 and October 25, 1995, re Update on Consolidation. CASA memo dated October 18, 1995 re Final Legislative Report. Draft procedure on the Training and Development Component of Human Resources Plan. Memo dated October 31, 1995 re Results of SCAOMD Plant Inspections. Letter dated November 3, 1995 from Southern California Water Committee, Inc. v September 27, 1995 MEMORANDUM TO: Don McIntyre General Manager FROM: Judy Wilso " Chief Admi trative Officer SUBJECT: Consolidation On September 26, Terry Andrus and I met with Dana Smith, Executive Officer of LAFCO to discuss the Consolidation of the Districts. This memorandum is intended to be a summary of that meeting, as well as an outline of the "next steps." Terry Andrus began the meeting by pointing out that eight of the Districts were formed under Section 4730 and the California Health and Safety Code, while District 14 (Irvine Ranch)was formed under Section 4730.1. Ms. Smith is an experienced LAFCO administrator and served as a LAFCO administrator in San Diego County for ten years, where she handled several water district consolidations. She seemed quite familiar with the issues. She will be preparing a "punch list" of items which will be required to initiate the proceedings. She urged that all terms and conditions be worked out internally, to the extent possible, prior to filing the petition and resolutions with LAFCO. A very detailed financial study will be required reviewing past budget information, three years of future costs, and an analysis of underlying debt. If we are opting to make our user fees uniform District-wide, an analysis will need to be completed showing the relative impacts on the users. The purpose of the study is to make full disclosure to the public of any potential downside impact on a portion of the communities included in the consolidation. She provided us with copies of the Santa Margarita Water District consolidation which she described as a very complex piece of work. She suggested that in the interest of time, the Districts may wish to hire a consultant who specializes in consolidations of special districts for LAFCO applications. Santa Margarita used John Sauvagot of Ford Sauvagot Management Group (619/589-MO). Ms. Smith said that his work was excellent and that he had produced a very comprehensive financial analysis study that provided LAFCO with all the necessary information. (I received a copy of this study from Ms. Smith to review.) CBDOC 0 P.O.Box 6127 0 Fountain Valley.CA B2728-8127 0 (714)962-2411 m Don McIntyre Page 2 September 27, 1995 Among the issues we discussed were: Resolutions: Each of the Districts should pass a resolution. If the Districts have nine resolutions requesting consolidation, LAFCO cannot deny, however, it may place terms and conditions on the consolidation. If there is a split vote on proceeding, LAFCO has more discretion in determining whether to move forward. Conditions: Among the conditions that can be placed on an application are: anything related to outstanding debt or bonds; contracts to be executed with other agencies prior to consolidation; boundaries; issues regarding fees and charges; conditions relating to successor agencies. Election: If 50% of the registered voters or 50% of the property owners protest, then it's killed (most unlikely). If we fail to have the full support of all of the districts to be consolidated, an election could be required. Working with LAFCO: It is apparent that to make progress we will need to have a very collaborative approach with LAFCO staff and work hand-in-glove with them on the preparation of the preliminary documents. Once the resolutions and the financial analysis are received, Ms. Smith estimates that it would take LAFCO approximately four months to process. IRWD: Because District 14 has wastewater treatment facilities and LAFCO generally disfavors overlapping jurisdictions, Ms. Smith suggested consolidating eight districts and contracting with IRWD, much as we do with SAWPA. That is obviously a policy issue for the Boards to grapple with. Metes and Bounds: Generally it has been my experience that a lot of time and expense is consumed in these proceedings by the necessity to provide metes and bounds and legal descriptions of the area. I asked Ms. Smith about this and she felt that if we are not changing boundaries for the consolidation, we can provide LAFCO with the legal descriptions already on hand. Don McIntyre Page 3 September 27, 1995 Other Special Districts: Another issue LAFCO may wish to address is existing special districts within the consolidated District boundaries. She noted that she had been meeting with Garden Grove about the possible dissolution of their district. This may complicate things. Next Steps • I will be sending Dana Smith a copy of the July 1995 Executive Committee report on consolidation so she can start the file and get more background. • Ms. Smith will be providing me with the 'punch list" of required items so we can assess the workload required and determine if an outside consultant will be needed. • I will contact John Sauvagot after I've had the opportunity to review his Santa Margarita Report to see if he is available to assist us in this effort and on what basis. • Terry Andrus will be meeting with Orange County's Deputy County Counsel who handles LAFCO matters to pick up helpful hints. • We need to set up a second meeting with Dana Smith. You need to be there. I'll arrange for the meeting in early October once we've reviewed the Santa Margarita material and have received the LAFCO punch list. We'II then have a better idea of the requirements of the process and the policy issues which will need to be addressed. JAW:jt J:NVPOOPGMICON50'.a9!' I .1 c: Terry Andrus COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA September 27, 1995 r sN -. 410SZ224111 .}r RO. etlmeew ;ftntai e�e,CA Ms. Dana Smith '0.e82 vaner.rn �+`�,ezgzBe,z7 Executive Officer '? Local Agency Formation Commission aVAft CA 12 Civic Center Plaza, Room 235 BHg�707B Santa Ana, CA 92701 Dear Dana: ` µ Thank you for the very helpful meeting y y ry pf g yesterday. As promised, enclosed is a copy of the July 26. 1995 report regarding consolidation. I expect this will • provide you with useful background information. twee _+ Anaheim As we discussed, I am awaiting your"punch list° of the various submissions .` k that LAFCO requires in order to process the request for consolidation. lam currently reviewing the Santa Margarita Water District consolidation material. fO1� wueY Once I receive your list of requirements, I'd like to set up a second meeting to ie5' -.Firmmn Beech specifically discuss all items and the anticipated time frame. --Ilene Le Hebre s+-,e Pe1m° Thank you again for your time. I'm looking forward to an expeditious and S.t 1> A em ma 1' Beech collaborative process. S. .."' Orange 'Phmnce Sincerely, /�l�ty cJcPsti. Pork (J (bMe Judith A. Wilson °we y of 0B"g° Chief Administrative Officer 86 j moaew JAW:e t Cam Mesa t�wa"ogwm°.wu.�nes.�l ¢`,i``GeMen G7 CAY .MM1Ye'ydWieO ' larch :S��+^yy.3y�1 A Public Wescewacer and Enwmnmenwl Management Agenq Committed m P acting Me Emamnmenc Since 1954 n• b V October 25, 1995 ' mm MEMORANDUM TO: Don F. McIntyre FROM: Judith A. Wilson Chief Administr veOfficer SUBJECT: Update on Consolidation At last month's Steering Committee meeting we reported on my September 26 meeting with Dana Smith, LAFCO Executive Director. At that time we reviewed the process and time-fine and Ms. Smith agreed to follow up with a basic punch-list of LAFCO requirements for this type of consolidation. On October 13, 1 received the attached correspondence from Dana Smith. Although it is still in draft form, Ms. Smith sent along the updated application packet for consolidation and merger proposals. This will provide us with useful guidance in formulating our application. On October 19, Gary Streed, Terry Andrus and I met with John Sauvajot, a consultant with considerable expertise in LAFCO applications. Mr. Sauvajot is the former Deputy CAD of San Diego County and has handled many major consolidations either as a LAFCO consultant to review submissions or as the consultant to the applicant. He has considerable experience dealing with sanitation and water district consolidations and was quite familiar with the types of analysis required. As noted previously, should the Districts wish to proceed with consolidation, LAFCO will be evaluating the application in terms of: governance; benefits to the citizenry; impacts on adjoining agencies; cost-effectiveness and efficiency. Because LAFCO is particularly concerned with streamlining government and avoiding overlapping jurisdictions. Mr. Sauvajot opined that it is likely that LAFCO would take the opportunity as it reviews the consolidation application to consider some additional issues such as: • Unincorporated areas within the consolidated district boundary that are currently on septic tank; CSDCC 0 P.O. Box 8127 0 Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 0 (714)962-2411 e Don F. McIntyre Page 2 October 25, 1995 Special sanitary districts within the boundaries, i.e. Mid Way City, Garden Grove and Costa Mesa, Los Alamitos County Water District and perhaps Sunset Beach Sanitary District. LAFCO may wish to use this process to consolidate these districts as well. • District 14, Irvine Ranch Water District may also be an issue. As noted before, LAFCO may view this as an overlapping jurisdiction and recommend the consolidation of eight districts with IRWD as a contractor. LAFCO can establish conditions on the Districts' application which may be controversial. As an example, the folks on one acre lots in Tustin may be very reluctant to be forced into a consolidated district. If the Districts find any conditions onerous, these conditions can be challenged at the public hearing, or in the extreme, the application can be withdrawn. In preparing the information for LAFCO, we will need to do a demographic analysis by District looking at housing costs, assessed valuation and socio-economic characteristics. LAFCO will be looking to see if the shift from status quo to consolidation poses any undue burden on any particular category of taxpayer or user. We will also need to supply LAFCO with a detailed implementation plan which would deal with all major contracts such as SAWPA and the military bases, i.e. Seal Beach Naval Station and the Tustin Lighter Than Air Base. We will also need to address how we would deal with outstanding debt which was not issued by the Joint Board and the financial implications of contracting with IRWD rather than consolidating with the District. For example, would we need to make a large cash-out payment and then raise user fees for the other eight districts? Next Steps • A careful review of the attached draft application form will be conducted and staff will assemble all necessary data. SCAG will be requested to run the demographic data by each district. • An analysis of options will be prepared with impact on governance, efficiency and cost to consider the following options: status quo; consolidation of nine districts; consolidation of eight districts. This analysis should be ready by the January '96 meeting cycle. Don F. McIntyre Page 3 October 25, 1995 • Regarding the unincorporated islands which are on septic tank and the existing sanitary districts within the proposed boundary for the consolidation, I suggest we ignore it for now. (It's not our agenda. We're not even sure it's LAFCO's) • As our analysis of the issue proceeds further, we should set up a follow-up meeting with Dana Smith. We can then determine if it's LAFCO's intention to stick with the application we submit or if they plan to drag some controversial matters (such as the above) into the process. JAW:cmc J',\wPDOMGMWWLSOW 02595.M1 Attachment y CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION of SANITATION AGENCIES 4 925 L Street,Smfe 1400 Sacramento,CA 95814 TEL:(916)44"388—FAX:(916)4484808 October 18, 1995 TO: CASA MEMBER AGENCIES (please share with your Board) ASSOCIATE/AFFILIATE MEMBERS & ATTORNEYS FROM: Mike Dillon, Lobbyist Bobbi Larson, Director of Regulatory Affairs RE: FINAL LEGISLATIVE REPORT GOVERNOR'S ACTIONS October 15th was the last day for the Governor to act on the hundreds of bills sent to him in the final days of this legislative session. However, the deadline was extended to midnight on October 16th due to the Legislature's adjourning past midnight September 15th. Measures signed by the Governor, except for a few with urgency clauses, will bmome effective January 1, 1996. Not many of the bills of special interest to CASA during the first year of the 1995.96 session reached the Governor's desk. Following are the Governor's actions on a few of the more significant bills on which the Governor signed into law: Senate Bills: SB 128 (Kelley} Authorizes local agencies to provide the 20% match for the State Revolving Fund Loan Program in return for a zero-interest loan. CASA position: Support SB 295 fKellevY. Authorizes the State Water Resources Control Boards or regional boards to issue general waste discharge requirements for biosolids and (according to the sponsors) eliminates the need for permits from three other state agencies, including the California Integrated Waste Management Board. Last minute amendments—made after the bill had been passed by both houses and then removed from the inactive file—added language suggesting that the Delta Protection Commission has the authority to regulate biosolids. As CASA is participating as an amicus in litigation challenging the Commission's land use plan provision banning reclaimed water and biosolids within the primary zone of the delta, CASA sought a veto of this bill. We were not successful; however, we did obtain a commitment from the bill's sponsor, Pima Gro, to request that Senator Kelley enter a letter in the Senate Journal clarifying the intent of the legislation with regard to permitting and the Commission's authority. (As an aside, during argument on the lawsuit, the Commission attorneys sought to use the passage of SB 205 to show that the legislature intended the Commission to have the authority to regulate biosolids.) CASA position: Oppose/seek veto SB 297 (Campbell): Requires, to the extent not in conflict with federal law, that where a principle state agency is not designated by statute, the Governor may designate a principle state agency for the coordination of procedures, forms, and deadlines in every definable area of regulatory activity under the state's jurisdiction. CASA position: Referred to Land Subcommittee. SB 342 (Campbell): Prohibits state agencies from levying or collecting any fee or charge in an amount that exceeds the estimated actual or reasonable cost of providing the service for which the fee or charge is imposed. CASA position: Support. SB 456_(Helley): Requires the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) to hold a public hearing when considering amending any policy or procedure for determining best available control technology for emissions sources. Also requires the SCAQMD to follow specified procedures when calculating the cost-effectiveness of new technology. CASA position: Refer to Air Subcommittee SB 564 (Johnston): requires the State Treasurer and local treasurers to annually prepare and submit a written statement of investment policy and a provide quarterly reports detailing information on the investment portfolio. CASA position: Support. SB 572 (Kelley): Authorizes the State Water Resources Control Board and regional to prescribe general waste discharge requirements for a category of discharges. CASA position: Approve. SB $66 (Craven): Imposes restrictions on the type and length of investments made by local agencies. Establishes and enhances education requirements for county financial officers. CASA position: Support. 2 SB 1108 (1.eslie): Designed to deal with the "good samaritan" liability problem, this bill allows state agencies and other entities which fund and implement projects to mitigate acid mine drainage pollution to avoid complete liability for site cleanup, provided there is an approved remediation plan and periodic monitoring is conducted. CASA position: Support. SB 1222 (Calderon): Enacts the Hazardous Waste Reform Act of 1995, including a number of significant changes to existing hazardous waste control laws. CASA position: Review/seek information SB 1286 (Moungoy): Requires public agencies to pay progress payments to the prime design professional within 30 days of receipt of a written demand and the final payment within 45 days. The public agency may withhold an amount not to exceed 150 percent of the amount concerning which there is a good faith dispute. CASA position: Disapprove. Assembly Bills AB 313 (McDonald): Requires the Department of Water Resources to adopt standards and methods regarding graywater systems for subsurface irrigation by January 1, 1997. CASA position: Approve. AB 486 (Goldsmith): Specifies that a lien on real property resulting from the delinquent payment of city or county utility charges (except a lien to discharge bonded indebtedness) shall be subordinate to any prior recorded lien on the property. CASA position: Watch closely. AB 531 MNorrissey): Requires the Air Resources Board to establish, by January 1, 1997, emission limits and a statewide program for portable internal combustion engines. CASA position: Approve. AB 552 (House): Authorizes the collection of a fine or monetary penalty for (1) any person who violates specified air pollution laws or (2) for conduct defined as 3 unfair competition; however, the same conduct cannot support levying penalties under both provisions. CASA: Approve. AB 717 Mucheny): Requires construction examiners and plan examiners who are employed by a local agency to meet specified experience and continuing education requirements. Also, requires these employees to be certified by a recognized state, national, or international association, as determined by the local agency. CASA position: Refer latest amendments to Legislative Committee. AB 791 (Can ellar Authorizes a public agency to use owner-controlled or "wrap- up" insurance for any public works project that costs over $125 million when specified conditions are met. CASA position: Oppose, unless amended. AB 1860 (Allen): Amends the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to require a lead agency to mail a copy of certain notices regarding the agency's approval of a project within 5 days from the agency's action to any person who submits a written request for such notification. Also, repeals the authorization for request of Notice of Determination and the extension on the statute of limitations for such a request and specifies a 10 day response period by a lead agency for litigation issues raised by CEQA exemptions. CASA position: Watch. SUMMARY OF LEGISLATION Attached is a summary on the more than 220 bills acted upon by the CASA Legislative Committee, chaired by Tom Woodruff this year. Please feel free to call Bobbi Larson or me if you have any questions. MFD:d llfio .95 4 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Draft Procedure Human Resources Plan Training and Development Component PURPOSE: To establish philosophy, purpose and assign responsibilities for the Districts' training and development program. PmLOSOPHY: The Sanitation Districts of Orange County are committed to the standards of a "high- performance workplace." A "high-performance workplace" is one that treats workers as assets; that invests heavily and wisely in training and continuous learning; and that encourages workers to solve problems; manage themselves; and develop an entrepreneurial attitude. To help in maintaining the commitment to "high-performance workplace" standards, the Districts have developed a comprehensive organizational development and training program. The program is designed with four major themes to guide it. Those themes are: - To LINK training and organizational development activities and outcomes clearly and explicitly to the Districts service needs, strategic goals and mission. - To MAINTAIN a strong customer focus (for both internal and external customers) in the design, development, and implementation of all raining and organizational development activities. - To MANAGE raining and organizational development with a systems view of performance in the Districts. This means to help everyone in the Districts understand the dynamic interaction between learning and the following areas: rewards and incentives, business processes, job design, job tools, equipment, safety, supervision, management, leadership, and performance assessment. -To MEASURE the training and organizational processes for the purpose of continuous improvement, and to determine return on investment. It is also the philosophy of this program for managers and supervisors to participate with their employees in the raining and development experience. For raining to be truly meaningful and applied on the job, skills learned and knowledge gained by raining participants must be supported and reinforced on the job. To help achieve this support and reinforcement, every effort will be made to offer "reinforcement and support" sessions to supervisors and managers prior to their employees participating in a training program. The reinforcement and support programs will be designed to give participants an understanding of what their employees are learning and the positive methods that will be most effective to help employees apply training 1 Page 2 Draft Training Policy on the job. To ensure a vitality and practicality for service delivery, it is the Districts' philosophy to invest in its most important asset - its employees. It is also the Districts belief that employees have a responsibility for their own development and for an understanding of the systems in which they work. The training and development opportunities being offered and those to be developed provide the means for the Districts to invest in its employees and for employees to meet their individual development responsibilities. Accordingly, it is the purpose of the training and development program to ensure an effective, efficient and responsive organization by: 1. Improving the performance of all employees in then present position. 2. Increasing the competence and ability of an employee to grow with the organization as it changes and grows. 3. Improving the overall competence and encourage the growth of an employee in a specified direction beyond the position the employee presently occupies so that succession planning can occur. 4. Respecting the commitment and service of those employees who choose to stay in their current positions and contribute to the success of the Districts. RESPONSIBILITY: Role of the Training Advisory Committee The Training Advisory Committee's mission is to assist the General Manager in accomplishing the mission and the strategic plan of the Districts through identifying and prioritizing training needs. To do this the committee will: 1. Develop training goals to meet identified needs. 2. Identify measurable objectives to determine if training goals are being met. 3. Advise on how to organize the training program within the various line departments. 4. Assist the Human Resource Director and Training Manager by helping to ensure: a. Training and development issues are clearly identified. b. Training needs vs. wants are distinguished. c. Training is job specific and correlates with job performance expectations. Page 3 Draft Training Policy Individual Departments (ROLE) Role of the Human Resource Department In addition to developing its own internal training and development plan, the Human Resources Department shall provide the coordination necessary for systematic and integrated training and development and provide in its efforts the following: 1. Support and assistance to Districts departments in designing activities to accomplish their training and development goals and meet anticipated needs. 2. An information and storage retrieval system for the purpose of assisting departments in tracking their development training and development activities, costs and benefits. Examples of such activities are Districts sponsored mining program participation, department specific programs that are completed, and outside training and development accomplishments. 3. Develop a comprehensive supervisory, administrative and leadership training and development program that will promote: a. The application of "high-performance workplace" principles outlined at the beginning of this policy. b. Promote an understanding of Districts' organizational values and management philosophy, and the positive application of both to the Districts' workforce. c. Teach and reinforce the skills needed for effective supervision, management and leadership. 4. Create an inventory of resources for use by departments and their employees to meet particular training and development needs. 5. Assist departments in conducting training and development needs analysis. 6. Assist departments in the establishment of "benchmarks" to evaluate the effectiveness of their training and development efforts in helping the Districts accomplish their mission and strategic goals. 7. Provide administrative support to the various committees and focus groups convened to recommend training and development policy, practice and curriculum. a m eo October 31, 1995 MEMORANDUM TO: Nancy Wheatley FROM: Ed Torres SUBJECT: Results of SCAQMD Plant Inspections On September 27, 1995, County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (Districts) received an inspection by an inspector from South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD) (see attachment for the Inspection Report). The purpose of the inspection was to verify compliance with our air quality permit conditions for Plants 1 and 2. The results of the inspection uncovered a noncompliance incident at Plant 1 which occurred in August of 1994. This entailed the operation of an emergency portable 80-HP diesel-fueled engine driven compressor in excess of 412 hours over the number of hours allowed by the permit. This emergency engine/compressor unit was used during a breakdown incident of an old electric compressor at Plant 1 . Uncler District procedures, one of the non-emergency engines driven compressors should have been used instead of the emergency engine. This oversight was due to the fact that the majority of our portable engines (23 out of 30) are permitted for non-emergency use which have no limits on the number of operating hours. Our staff simply overlooked the fact that some engines have operational limits and most do not. Recerdkeeping and better communication could have avoided the error. But from a practical standpoint (and certainly the standpoint of our maintenance staff), an engine is an engine is an engine. Nevertheless, the outcome of this incident almost resulted in the issuance of a Notice of Violation (NOV) by SCAQMD. Typically, an NOV can result in monetary penalties or more stringent compliance requirements. SCAQMD's Public Facilities Branch Manager was in the process of referring this issue to their prosecutor's office for enforcement. However, due to our good working relationship with SCAQMD they were willing to have a meeting per our request to discuss this matter. In this meeting we provided SCAQMD a calculation of the excess emissions from the emergency engine, corrective actions taken by Districts to prevent this from occurring in the future (which consisted of tagging the engines and meetings with Operations and Maintenance to discuss our compliance CSDOC 0 P.O.Box 8127 • Fountain W Wy,CA 92728.8127 0 (714)992-2411 Nancy Wheatley Page 2 October31, 1995 requirements), and options to offset the excess emissions. The option agreed upon was to offset these emissions by permitting the emergency engine to be a non- emergency engine. The re-permitting of this emergency engine is what the Maintenance Department indicated they wanted regardless of the options identified. The reason SCAQMD agreed to this is because it will require Districts and SCAQMD to provide emission reduction credits to permit this engine, which the Districts currently retain. Thus, the out come of this will result in a long term benefit to air quality, additional flexibility to Districts and no issuance of an NOV for this violation. I would like to commend the members of the Environment Management Division (EMD) involved in resolving this incident with SCAQMD, and working with Operations and Maintenance to identify options and solutions to prevent this type of incident from occurring in the future. If you have any questions concerning this please call me at extension 3675. ET:KH:vcm G WPOOL14dn140 31.. Attachments Distribution: Don McIntyre Blake Anderson Judy Wilson Bob Ooten Ed Hodges Dave Ludwin c: EMD Air Quality Section Mark Esquer Richard Pigmon Betty Burnet EMD File Southern California Water Committee, Inc. 34 Exeeurive Park,Suitt 200,Irvine,California 92714 Phone 714 261-7466 • Fax 714 261-9341 BOARD OF TRUSTEES COUMYSUPERVISORS November 3, 1995 HoN.BILL Coll,CHAIRUAN WUNIY IW IMPERIAL MON MKNAKLANAONOVICH MUM OF LOU ANCFLRS Mr. Don McIntyre MON.MARIN BIJKAUON General Manager ISNINIY OF ORAHGL g Him.JoxH K.FLYNN Orange County Sanitation District HON.s @ VFxIURA P. O. Box 8127 .IU sT11VRIMEx IxMN'rc oP KrAN Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 Hnx,InHN F.TAVACUMV. a+LN IRS RIVERSIDE H,+n.LARRY WALAFA IS IIINIY IN RAN BERNARDINO Dear Mr. McIntyre: ISIUNIY M SAN DIEW PCL E=JR. ESECTOR The months ahead provide an unprecedented opportunity to develop firm plans to derive future PAUL NCKE POIN5eTIIA RANCH water supplies from the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, a significant source of water for VnRI FABRPI IANARI FAWN Southern California. JopN Fuel RIVM11) COUNTY FARM PU"FAU RUNSFULHANIIN.SR. At the SCWC Annual Meeting and Dinner last week, Charles Rund, President of Charlton nl'NKIFI GkMU,INC. 1111N,kUHNNA Research Company, briefed the Board of Trustees on a poll of 800 California adults (the poll FA Rex Lun1A was conducted throughout the state between July 23 and July 25, 1995). The results of this I'INIUM MUM RAW RURMU survey indicate that Californians overwhelmingly support expanding the state's water supply RVPENT L SPAT MANGN MUM RAW FURMU infrastructure and question why such improvements have not already been made. CIIYSECTOR H,AV PAULAIXKRMANN ,1IV„1TAFT Three-quarters of those polled say California's long-term water supply is a serious problem and P:I IV OM"RIVMLIDE favor improving and expanding the state's water storage and delivery system so more water can WIN.KATHY DAVIT be captured, stored, and delivered to water users in the state. A .'OF Al' vetur HAS.JIMN F,"M"V H N. IAM A DO E While the public feels strongly about these issues, theydo not have sufficient depth of HVN. IUNANIN)PNRII y P I'll IW MOORP.IRK understanding on specifics. Only a small fraction of the respondents know that environmental iIT»NADIEW LLIxGS problems in the Delta constrain water deliveries throughout much of the state and have BUSINESS SECTOR institutionalized drought conditions even in heavy rainfall years. R,"WWRI'W.BEIN IIVNMI'I'AKIN,MUAAM FROG&AS":. Lire rHnYNrrnLFR(InucRRA AGENCY Southern California Water Committee is committed to informing the public on water n183 AIL DIMICK issues, especially now during the important CALFED process on Delta water quality standards. INIANI I wNIAINN"CONun MININ RII:IIANII K.IxMIa+N In our twelfth year, the SCWC has set as their goal the development of an effective broad- IIWx'AI, Kxn +M.TFu based consensus supporting the need to meet our region's water requirements. AN RI lWH'I'KNITFA.TRMSURY.N KIIIAI'kll aRI fDl,fmAPT P'x:'I4R1 LLAMnLKMFRamovum We face a challenge to.ensure that California's water situation is improved. Your support and TW IAY ININF IGsee are crucial elements in that effort. Thank you for attendingour annual meetingparticipation SrFIvxN A.zAnrnaxNY and dinner. As your representative, we will keep you apprised of the progress to secure our KII ISI.A UNn'ON.MONSAN O LO. WATERSECTOR State's water future. Wo I IAU R.Coxon' INN RIAL IRAGAMON DISTR¢'1 Very truly OUtB, C,c JOHN V.FIN.EY ry 1' y' nOL9p+N NI1:UR1.WA ON,I11Rfl0Fn /. , _ 4 n.I Hill F/�////M119pr�„��/Ir/I'- .HL4,BASIN."A AUTRICr JoHNJOHNPOx MIN RAnnPAI.WATYA OIPIAIIT p+NCHRULA ALL Robert A. K Eger 1'1 L IARIi.0 vN.Rr mAnA IxNra1IT KFILN U Chairman JomMUM RATER K.RNIY pwx 0.WODPAR:A SIYI'x,NYNJTAx mATPA IpSIPIa',N co: Board of Trustees Hux.HARRIETT M.WAIN" CHAR FMRRIM EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Annu1nUgMlg1095\auen96.mlL J,MN WILSON AMASON A mpmriw O%V p(hlai,Fm,pNerFAmm.RAN,Apprie.xerindrprc.and pnMir;A"O n. Summary of Findings Statewide Survey of Californians' Attitudes Toward Water Storage and Supply - August 1995 - I I j Conducted by Charlton Research Company i I Summary of Findings Statewide Survey or Californians' Attitudes Toward Water Storage and Supply August 199S Methodology The following is a summary of findings from a statewide telephone survey of Califtimians. A random sample,proportionate to the slate's demographics, of 800 adults was interviewed between July 23 and 25, 1995. The survey was approximately 17 minutes in length and has a margin of error of+/- 3.5%. Key Findings The public perceives that California's future water supply is a serious problem. There is strong support among Californians to balance environmental and economic concerns. • Californians overwhelmingly support the need to improve and expand the water storage and delivery system in Califomia. • The public understands that California will continue to grow and that additional water storage and supply is necessary for a growing population. Conservation alone is insufficient • People also feel very strongly that we need a sufficient.reliable and affordable water supply in California in order to maintain a strong economy. • While the public feels strongly about many of these issues,dm is not a sufficient depth of understanding on specs. This indicates the need to educate the public and reinforce many of its general inclinations on water supply issues. • Similar to concerns about the long-term supply issue,three-quarters of the respondents also feel that Californians will likely face water shortages in the next 20 years. Just one in seven feel that shortages are unlikely. • Over one in five Californians say they have suffered negative effects from water shortages. This group primarily cited general inconvenience issues and secondarily mentioned tangible damage to lawns as examples of the negative effects. • Californians have nixed views,and in some cases mispenxpuans of the source of the stare's water supply. The following is a list of sources,ranked by percentages of respondents who said that"a lot"of the state's water supply came from each sauce: Runoff from the mountains 58% Reservoirs 53% The California Aqueduct 47% Sacramento/San Joaquin River Delta 40% Major rivers 39% Water conservation or recycling 23% Ground water or well water 22% De-salination projects 5% This data illustrates that many Californians perceive much of their water as coming from runoff and being captured in reservoirs. This and other studies have shown a significant frustration among the public, as most people do not understand why the state has not built more reservoirs to capture runoff,which most people believe just"runs to the sea" Water Qualay/Prtce • A plurality,44%,of the state rate their water quality either excellent or good Another 3 1% say it is fair and close to one in four,23%,say their water quality is poor. Most Californians think the amount of money they pay for their water is about right,but one-third say they pay too much. CHARLTON RESEARCH COMPANY pore 3 Water 5uppll and Storage u • General attitudes toward the need for additional water storage capabilities and supplies are quite strong. Super majorities of 90%agree that we need a sufficient, reliable and affordable water supply to maintain a Moog economy,and over 80% agree we need them to provide water for our growing population. Seven out of ten Californians also agree that additional water storage and supply will help create jobs in California- Eight out of ten Californians also agree that there is a link between the environmea[ and California's water supply. And,thrayuartgs agree that additional water storage and supply will help improve the eovironment • As earlier data illustrated, conservation is seen as"the answer"to only a segment of the population and that segment is a minority. In a tradeoff question on this issue, a majority of 55% say we need to increase our supplies of water,without cutting supplies to current users, versus 36% who say we should not create new supplies,because we should cut the amount of water we now use. • Close to two-thirds of the state,63%,say that California's current water storage and delivery system is a serious problem. By comparison,26% feel the current system is not a serious problem, and 12% say they do nor know. • Californians overwhelmingly favor the concept of improving and expanding California's water storage and delivery system. Almost eight in ten,79%, favor that concept so that more water can be captured,stored and delivered to water users in the state. Support for the concept is also deep. as 45% strongly favor it and just 34% somewhat favor it Only 12%of the state oppose the concept.with another nine percent undecided • This preceding"ballot"question,on the water storage and delivery system, is illustrative of Californians' underlying attitudes toward water. they do nor know a lot of details,but they believe we need more storage in order to deliver water to a growing population. They support the concept of increased water supply and storage capabilities,but they need to be educated and have thew general inclinations reinforced with specifics. CHARLTON RESEARCH COMPluNY Poe, 5 WATER COALmON STATEWIDE PUBLIC OPINION POLL conducted by Chariton Resurcb Company PARTICIPATING ORGANIZATIONS (providing funding) Association of California Water Agencies Council for a Green Environment California Chamber of Commerce California Farm Water Coalition California Water Resources Association Central Valley Project Water Association Delta Restoration Coalition Southern California Water Committee State Water Contractors 9 AGENDA JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 15, 1995 -7:30 P.M. i In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2 this agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the Districts'Administrative Offices not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to I each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. i In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to he submitted to the Boards for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an emergency item or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the attention of the Districts subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. i (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll call . (3) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders) (4) Appointment of Chair pro tem, if necessary (5) Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Boards on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot have action taken by the Boards of Directors except as authorized by Section 54954.2(b). V 11/15/95 P (6) The Joint Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. (a) Report of Joint Chair, consideration of Resolutions or commendations, presentations and awards (b) Report of General Manager (c) Report of General Counsel (7) EACH DISTRICT If no corrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair. District 1 - October 25, 1995 regular District 2 - October 25, 1995 regular District 3 - October 25, 1995 regular District 5 - October 25, 1995 regular District 6 - October 25, 1995 regular District 7 - October 25, 1995 regular District 11 - October 25, 1995 regular District 13 - October 25, 1995 regular District 14 - October 25, 1995 regular (8) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vole differently for any District.) 10/18/95 10/24/95 11/01/95 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $ 658,050.82 $119,358.63 $ 933,965.66 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 191.170.21 1,048,966.91 Joint Working Capital Fund - 254.453.48 198,213.79 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 14,232.27 46,644.44 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 0.00 120.00 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 21,735.55 15,650.52 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 43,949.80 84,786.67 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 3,866.17 7,089.92 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 0.00 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 170,893.99 28,100.79 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 150,986.15 1,273.51 DISTRICT NO. 13 - 0.00 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 14 - 213,199.03 1.026.93 DISTRICTS NOS. 3 & 11 JOINT - 1,437.50 0.00 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 &6 JOINT - 42,738.90 6,234.68 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 &7 JOINT - 0.00 2,596.34 DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 794.77 6,038.16 $1.76Z508.64 1119.358.63 $2,380,708.32 -2- tl S 1 1/15/95 (9) CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 9(a) ' All matters placed on the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or i further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the I consent calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there i will beno separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by.one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for _ I resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. I Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be j removed from the consent calendar. i The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. : - ! j Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: DISTRICT 7 (a) Consideration of Resolution No. 95-116-7, approving Agreement with the Orange County Flood Control District, providing for reimbursement of costs to the Flood Control District for Relocation of Gisler-Red Hill Trunk Sewer Siphon under the Santa Ana-Delhi Channel, Contract No. 7-1-2, in conjunction with OCFCD improvements to the Santa Ana-Delhi Channel within the Cities of Tustin, Irvine, Santa Ana, Costa Mesa and unincorporated County territory; and authorizing payment of $78,750.00 for District's portion of said work. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (10) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any -3- 11/15/95 (11) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of motion changing the Regular Joint Board meeting date from Wednesday, November 27, 1996 to Wednesday, November 20, 1996 at 7:30 p.m. due to the Thanksgiving Holiday. (b) Consideration of motion changing the Regular Joint Board meeting date from Wednesday, December 25, 1996 to Wednesday, December 18, 1996 at 7:30 p.m. due to the Christmas Holiday. (12) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Minutes of the Executive Committee (1) Receive and file draft Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization Study Committee Minutes for the meetings held on October 19, 1995 and November 2, 1995. (2) Receive and file draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on October 25, 1995. (3) Receive and file draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on November 1, 1995. (4) Receive and file draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on November 2, 1995. (5) Receive and file draft Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on November 8, 1995. (6) Receive and file draft Executive Committee Minutes for the meeting held on November 8, 1995. (b) Consideration of the following actions recommended by said committees: -4- (ITEM (12)(b) CONTINUED ON PAGE 5] 11/15/95 (12) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 4) (b) (1) Consideration of the following actions relative to the Professional Services Agreement with Coleman/Caskey Architects, Inc. for preparation of Space Utilization Study (Job No. J-38-1), as follows: (a) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization Study certification of the final negotiated fee with Coleman/Caskey Architects, Inc. for said services. (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 95-109, approving said agreement with Coleman/Caskey Architects, Inc. for said services on an hourly rate basis for labor plus overhead, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $155,550.00. (2) OMTS95-036a Consideration of motion to void the Engineering Feasibility Studies Agreement with Southern California Edison "ENVEST" Program approved at the July 26, 1995 Joint Boards' meeting; and, authorizing the General Manager to enter into a new comprehensive Agreement with the Southern California Edison (SCE) "ENVEST° Program to study energy conservation measures at the Districts' treatment plants, with no change in the previously authorized amount of$30,000.00, to include design and construction portions to SCE funding with provisions that actual execution of the design and construction phases are subject to future authorization by the Districts' Boards of Directors. (3) PDC95-34 Consideration of Resolution No. 95-110, approving plans and specifications for Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2, Job No. 132-35-3; Process Area Fire Protection, Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-5; Process Area Fire Protection, Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. P246; and, Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-55, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids (Tentative bid date is January 9, 1996). (4) PDC95-36 Consideration of motion authorizing staff to solicit proposals for professional services agreements for planning, design and construction services for projects as follows, (a) Investigation and Repair of Ocean Outfalls, Job No. J-39 (b) Management of Peak Hydraulic Discharge, Job No. J40-1 (c) Determination of Financial Charges and Fee Structures, Job No. J-40-2 -5- [ITEM (12)(b) CONTINUED ON PAGE 6] 11/15/95 (12) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 5) (b) (5) FAHR95-38 Consideration of Resolution No. 95-111, approving Professional Services Agreement with Kerry Consulting Group for preparation of New Financial Information System, Phase III, Selection Process for Hardware and Software; and Phase IV, Implementation and Acceptance of the Selected Hardware and Software Solutions (Specification No. P-167), on an hourly-rate basis including labor, overhead, direct expenses and profit, plus out-of-pocket costs, for an amount not to exceed $56,263.00. (6) FAHR95-44 Consideration of Resolution No. 95-112, Revising Districts' Procedure for Settlement of Claims Made Against the Districts; Settlement of Claims Made by the Districts; Collection of Delinquent Accounts Owing to the Districts; Settlement of Civil or Administrative Actions; and Settlement of Worker's Compensation Actions; and repealing Resolution Nos. 93-13 and 90-89. (7) FAHR9546 Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report prepared by staff and Moreland &Associates, Certified Public Accountants, for the year ending June 30, 1995 (Report will be made available at meeting). (8) FPC95-13 Consideration of the following actions re Deferred Compensation Plan -Accounting for Participants' Contributions: (a) Authorize the Finance Director to deposit $935,336 with Lincoln National Insurance Plan from the Joint Contingency Reserve Fund. (b) Do not provide an "interest earnings" adjustment. (c) Authorize the Finance Director to transfer and credit the entire value of the receivable due from the County of Orange, pursuant to the Bankruptcy settlement, the Districts' CORF and General Operating Contingency Reserve Fund and to remove the value of any such receivable from all funds other than the Reserve Funds (d) Authorize the Finance Director to restore all funds except the Contingency Reserve Funds to their respective pre-bankruptcy position balances (12/5/94). (a) Upon receipt of proceeds from the Bankruptcy Settlement Agreements, authorize the Finance Director to deposit these proceeds to the respective CORF and General Operating Budgets Contingency Reserve Funds. -6- [ITEM (12)(b) CONTINUED ON PAGE 7] 11/15/95 (12) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 6) (b) (9) FXEC95-04 Consideration of Resolution No. 95-113, approving Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13 and County Sanitation District No. 14 for Purchase and Sale of Capacity Rights in Treatment, Disposal and Sewer Facilities, modifying said agreement to provide for changes in the method of calculation District No. 14's annual CORF budget and Annual Integration Adjustment, and to comply with CSDOC's reserve policy. (13) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve staff Summary Financial Report for the three-month period ending September 30, 1995. (14) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of the following actions relative to Ocean Outfall Booster Station Control System Upgrade at Plants Nos. 1 &2, Job No. J-31-2: (a) Verbal report of Director of Engineering (b) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for said project, clarifying contractor's license requirements. (c) Consideration of Resolution No. 95-114, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Ocean Ouffall Booster Station Control System Upgrade at Plants Nos. 1 &2, Job No. J-31-2, to Shasta Electric, LP, in the total amount of$860,820.00. (15) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of Resolution No. 95-115, approving Standardized Emergency Management System Operational Area Agreement (SEMS)with the County of Orange. (16) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of the following actions relative to introduction of proposed Ordinance No. 128, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Providing for an Early Retirement Incentive Program by Granting Additional Service Credit to Eligible Districts' Employees as Authorized by the County Employees' Retirement Law of 1937, Government Code Section 31641.04 (FAHR95-24): (a) Verbal report of General Counsel. (b) Consideration of roll call vote motion approving the program and authorizing District No. 1 to enact an Ordinance implementing the program. (c) Consideration of motion to read said Ordinance No. 128 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). (d) Consideration of motion to introduce Ordinance No. 128 and pass to second reading at the December 13, 1995 Board Meeting. -7- f 11/15/95 (17) ALL DISTRICTS Update re proposed acquisition of County of Orange Integrated Waste Management System. (18) ALL DISTRICTS Update concerning developments related to the County's Commingled Investment Pool. (19) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of the following actions relative to introduction and adoption of proposed Urgency Ordinances Relating to Excess Capacity Charges for Sewer Connections, Repealing Ordinances Establishing and Payment of Excess Capacity Charges: Repealing District Ordinance Ordinances 1 129 125 & 127 2 221 219 &220 3 324 322 & 323 5 533 531 & 532 6 627 625 & 626 7 734 732 &733 11 1123 1121 & 1122 13 1317 1315 & 1316 14 1409 1407 & 1408 (a) Verbal report of Director of Technical Services (b) Verbal report of General Counsel (c) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of the following actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 129, An Urgency Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Repealing Ordinance Nos. 125 and 127 Establishing and Payment of Excess Capacity Charges for Sewer Connections: (1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 129 by title only and waive reading of said entire Ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vole of Directors present). (2) Consideration of roll call vote motion adopting Ordinance No. 129, as an urgency measure to be effective immediately. -6- [ITEM (19) CONTINUED ON PAGE 9] .� 11/15/95 (19) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 8) (d) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of the following actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 221, An Urgency Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, Repealing Ordinance Nos. 219 and 220 Establishing and Payment of Excess Capacity Charges for Sewer Connections: (1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 221 by title only and waive reading of said entire Ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). (2) Consideration of roll call vote motion adopting Ordinance No. 221, as an urgency measure to be effective immediately. (a) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of the following actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 324, An Urgency Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, Repealing Ordinance Nos. 322 and 323 Establishing and Payment of Excess Capacity Charges for Sewer Connections: (1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 324 by title only and waive reading of said entire Ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). (2) Consideration of roll call vote motion adopting Ordinance No. 324, as an urgency measure to be effective immediately. (f) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of the following actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 533, An Urgency Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Repealing Ordinance Nos. 531 and 532 Establishing and Payment of Excess Capacity Charges for Sewer Connections: (1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 533 by title only and waive reading of said entire Ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). (2) Consideration of roll call vote motion adopting Ordinance No. 533, as an urgency measure to be effective immediately. -9- [ITEM (19) CONTINUED ON PAGE 10 11/15/95 (19) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 9) (g) DISTRICT6 Consideration of the following actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 627, An Urgency Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Repealing Ordinance Nos. 625 and 626 Establishing and Payment of Excess Capacity Charges for Sewer Connections: (1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 627 by title only and waive reading of said entire Ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). (2) Consideration of roll call vote motion adopting Ordinance No. 627, as an urgency measure to be effective immediately. (h) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of the following actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 734, An Urgency Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, Repealing Ordinance Nos. 732 and 733 Establishing and Payment of Excess Capacity Charges for Sewer Connections: (1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 734 by title only and waive reading of said entire Ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). (2) Consideration of roll call vote motion adopting Ordinance No. 734, as an urgency measure to be effective immediately. (i) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of the following actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 1123, An Urgency Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, Repealing Ordinance Nos. 1121 and 1122 Establishing and Payment of Excess Capacity Charges for Sewer Connections: (1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 1123 by title only and waive reading of said entire Ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). (2) Consideration of roll call vote motion adopting Ordinance No. 1123, as an urgency measure to be effective immediately. -10- [ITEM (19) CONTINUED ON PAGE 11] a ;. 11/15/95 (19) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 10) (j) DISTRICT 13 Consideration of the following actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 1317, An Urgency Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, Repealing Ordinance Nos. 1315 and 1316 Establishing and Payment of Excess Capacity Charges for Sewer Connections: (1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 1317 by title only and waive reading of said entire Ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). (2) Consideration of roll call vote motion adopting Ordinance No. 1317, as an urgency measure to be effective immediately. (k) DISTRICT 14 Consideration of the following actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 1409, An Urgency Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 of Orange County, California, Repealing Ordinance Nos. 1407 and 1408 Establishing and Payment of Excess Capacity Charges for Sewer Connections: (1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 1409 by title only and waive reading of said entire Ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). (2) Consideration of roll call vote motion adopting Ordinance No. 1409, as an urgency measure to be effective immediately. (20) ALL DISTRICTS cLOSE�SE ION qurtgp tFr�eiloouur�se of,conduchgy the 4usrne less set forth on y i . thisag9Idea§'tl"� �'i Y` t�' ' eA.pli'1' a'�b�ril§1�111�"I �,ffrn� pin�Menethe I Boards"In' closed session to consider matters of pending of potential litigation,or 1 I personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9, 54957 or 54957.6. Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property, (b) matters of pending or potential fi igation, (c) employment actions or negotiations with employee representatives, or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act,may be reviewed by the Boards during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such Line as final actions are taken by the Boards on any of these subjects,the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. i__.................._.._...._.......____..._____._..___._........_....__............._.._..__..___.._.—..._.._.__._.._.._..._.._.� _11_ [ITEM (20) CONTINUED ON PAGE 12] 11/15/95 , (20) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 11) (a) Convene in closed session, if necessary (b) (1) Confer with General Counsel re status of litigation, Louis Sangermano v. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. (2) Confer with General Counsel re status of litigation, County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California v. E. L. Yeager Construction Company, at al. (c) Reconvene in regular session (d) Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session (21) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (22) ALL DISTRICTS Matters which a Director would like staff to report on at a subsequent meeting (23) ALL DISTRICTS Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff report (24) DISTRICT 1 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (25) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn (26) DISTRICT 2 OMTS95-046 Consideration of motion recommending approval of Permit Agreement between Serrano Water District and District No. 2, authorizing a one- time excess capacity charge payment of$26,404.49. (27) DISTRICT2 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (26) DISTRICT2 Consideration of motion to adjourn -12- 2 11/15/95 (29) DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (30) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn (31) DISTRICT Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (32) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn (33) DISTRICT 6 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (34) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn (35) DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (36) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn (37) DISTRICT 11 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (36) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn (39) DISTRICT 13 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (40) DISTRICT 13 Consideration of motion to adjourn (41) DISTRICT14 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (42) DISTRICT 14 Consideration of motion to adjourn -13- 11/15/95 NOTICE TO_DIRECTCRS To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Joint Boards, Directors shall submit items to the Board Secretary not later than the close of business 14 days preceding the Joint Board meeting. The Board Secretaryshall include on the.agenda all items submitted by Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and all formal communications. I Board Secretary: Penny Kyle (714) 962-2411, ext. 2026 Secretary: Patricia L Jonk (714) 962-2411, ext. 2029 i wPDOc1B5WG95WOV95W.11 0 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1 , 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 , 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES JOINT BOARD MEETING OCTOBER 25, 1995 �\oa0\g{RICTS OF p9g2 yQe � o c z � v a v.rw pT�CTiNG THE ENS\P���`c. ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 POLL CALL A regular meeting of We Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districu Nos. 1, 2, 3,6,B, ' 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, CelNomla, waa held on October 25, 1995,st 7:30 p.m.,in the Districts' Administrative Offices. Fallowing the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3. 5, B, 7, 71, 13 and 14 As follows: ACTIVE ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO. 1: Pat McGuigan, Chair _ Ted R. Moreno James M.Ferrymen,Chair pro tern _ Arthur Pony Mark A.Murphy _ Joanne Crania ,Jt_ Thomas R. Saharolli Jim Potts y Roger Sharon Willem G. Steirer DISTRICT NO.2: g John Collins, Chair George Scott Danel T.Welch, Chair on,tam John M.Gulf son Barry Deres Bob Bell Bunie Daniel, Glenn Parker y Norman 2. Eckem ile Carol Downey James H.Flora Steve Anderson Pot McGuigan Ted R.More. 1 Mark A.Murphy Joarva COwR • Julie Sa Chris Not, 1 Sheldon Singer George L.Zlaket • Roger Stanton Witham G.Steiner ._ Bob Zemel Tom Daly DISTRICT NO.3: l Sal A. Saner. Chelr Harry M. Dotson g Burnie Dump. Chair pro tem Glenn Fanner Cecile Age Waiter Bowman George Brown Mnilyn Bruce hearings y_ John Collins _ George Son _JL Amea H.Flora Steve Anderson 1 Don R.Griffin Patsy Marshall JL_ Vivo,Leipzig Ralph Bauer l Wally Linn Eye G.Mi er 1 Pet McGuigan Ted R.Moreno Mm,a L.Rice Grace Epperson Julie Sa Chris Flavor Sheldon Singer George L.Z4ket Roger Stanton Willa.G.Stabler Charles Sylvia Rupert waMsimm 3 Bob Zemel Tom Daly DISTRICT NO. 5: x Jan Debar. Chair John C.Cos.Jr. v William G.Steirer.Chair pro ban Roper Stanton 3 JOM C.Cox.Jr. An Delany DISTRICT NO,B: James M.Farrpran.Chair Ann.,Pen, Jan Debav,Chair We been John C.Can.Jr. 1 William G. Stems, Paper Stephen DISTRICT N0.7: Barry Hammond,Chair Mike Ward Thomas R. Seltaregh Chair pro tam Jim Pons • Jan Dehav John C.Co.,Jr. • James M.Ferryman Anhui Perry Pet McGuigan Ted R. Moreno x Mink A. Murphy Joanne Cmmnn William G. Steiner Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 11: 1 Victor Lostip, Cbart Ralph Bauer Sinai, Danish.Chair pro hem Ralph Bauer x Roger Stanton William G.Steiner DISTRICT NO. 13: y John M.G.Ibm0n, Chair Daniel T.Welch J_ Bob Zemel.Chair pro rem Tom Daly Mark A. Murphy Joanne Comma Glenn Parker Bumie Duna, i William G. Steirer Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 14: Thomas R.Si liarelli,Chair Jim Pons Mark A.Murphy, Chair Pro tam Joanne Coonu x Berry Hammond Mike Want a William G.Ste., Roper Sti moan y Peer A.Swan Darryl Miller -2- 10/25/95 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Don McIntyre, General Manager, Blake P. Anderson, Assistant General Manager-Operations, Judith A. Wilson, Assistant General Manager-Administration, Penny Kyle, Board Secretary, Corinne Berenson, Don Crapnell, Mark Esquer, John Finias, Gary Hasenstab, Irwin Haydock, Mike Herrera, Ed Hodges, Patricia Jonk, Terri Josway, Steve Kozak, John Linder, Charles McGee, Gary Streed, Mahin Talebi, Dan Tunnicliff, Paula Zeller OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Terry Andrus, Assistant General Counsel, Chip Clements, Michael Jarman, Jon Schotz, Phil Stone ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Joint Chair The Joint Chair reported that the CASA Fall Technical Meeting is scheduled for November 16th and 17th at the Hyatt Regency in Irvine, and encouraged Directors' attendance. The following tentatively scheduled upcoming meetings were then announced, as follows: Operations, Maintenance, and Technical Services Committee - Wednesday, November 1, at 5:30 p.m. Planning, Design, and Construction Committee -Thursday, November 2, at 5:00 p.m. at Plant No. 2. Finance, Administrative, and Human Resources Committee - Wednesday, November 8, at 5:30 p.m. Executive Committee - Wednesday, November 8, at 7:00 p.m. Steering Committee - Wednesday, November 15, at 5:30 p.m. -3- 10/25/95 DISTRICT 1 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held September 27, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held September 27, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 3 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held September 27, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held September 27, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 6 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held September 27, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 7 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held September 27, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -4- 10/25/95 DISTRICT 11 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held September 27, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 13 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held September 27, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 14 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held September 27, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. ALL DISTRICTS Ratification of payment of Joint and Individual District Claims Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That payment of Joint and Individual District claims set forth on exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. -5- 10/25/95 10/04/95 & 09/20/95 6/95 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $620,187.44 $798,567.03 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 5W,310.76 461,765.16 Joint Working Capital Fund - 115.727.22 135,017.29 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 52,888.38 25,857.34 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 6,317.55 225.00 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 14,322.53 42,506.41 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 234,237.02 81,253.70 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 18,211.07 11,618.76 DISTRICT NO, 6 - 1,232.01 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 7,325.96 62,003.57 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 336,183.65 15,861.88 DISTRICT NO, 13 47.18 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 14 1,952.52 48,450.83 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 &6 JOINT - 121,382.77 4,095.96 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 0.00 2,930.72 DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 0.00 5,643.39 $2,090,326.06 $1.695.797.04 ALL DISTRICTS Actions re Purchase of Three Cab and Chassis with Crane Mounted Service Body. Specification No. V-008 Receive and file letter from Maurice J. Sopp Truck Center Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the letter dated September 28, 1995, from Maurice J. Sopp Truck Center, apparent low bidder, requesting that they be allowed to withdraw their bid for Purchase of Three Cab and Chassis with Crane Mounted Service Body, Specification No. V-008, due to a mathematical error, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed, and approved. -6- 10/25/95 Awardina Purchase of Specification No. V-008. to Mike McCarthy Buick & GMC Truck Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the bid tabulation and recommendation for award of Purchase of Three Cab and Chassis with Crane Mounted Service Body, Specification No. V-008, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase order be, and is hereby, awarded to Mike McCarthy Buick & GMC Truck, for a total amount not to exceed $124,346.37, plus sales tax. ALL DISTRICTS Approving Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement with Falcon Disposal Services, Inc. Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement with Falcon Disposal Services, Inc., for transportation of residual solids for disposal within a 40-mile radius, extending the agreement for a six-month period beginning October 30, 1995, at the existing contract unit price of$260.00 per load for grit and screening, and $12.08 per ton for sludge, be, and is hereby, approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to execute said Amendment in form approved by General Counsel. ALL DISTRICTS Approving Amendment No. 4 to the Agreement with BKK Corporation Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Amendment No. 4 to the Agreement with BKK Corporation for interim residual solids disposal, extending the agreement for a six-month period beginning October 30, 1995, at the existing contract unit price of$31.38 per ton for grit, screenings, and sludge, be, and is hereby, approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to execute said Amendment in form approved by General Counsel. -7- 10/25/95 ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file draft minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization Studv Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the draft minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization Study meetings held on July 14, 1995, and September 13, 1995, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file draft minutes of the Steering Committee Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the draft minutes of the Steering Committee meeting held on September 27, 1995, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file draft minutes of the Operations. Maintenance. and Technical Services Committee Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the draft minutes of the Operations, Maintenance, and Technical Services Committee meeting held on October 4, 1995, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file draft minutes of the Planning. Design. and Construction Committee Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the draft minutes of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee meeting held on October 5, 1995, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. -8- 10/25/95 ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file draft minutes of the Finance Administration and Human Resources Committee Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the draft minutes of the Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee meeting held on October 11, 1995, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file draft minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re Landfill Acouisition Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the draft minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re Landfill Acquisition meeting held on October 18, 1995, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file draft minutes of the Executive Committee Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the draft minutes of the Executive Committee meeting held on October 18, 1995, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS (OMTS95-043) Ajprovina Professional Services Agreement with Communications Performance Group. Inc. for design of an Integrated Emergencv Response Plan (Specification No. P-166) Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Operations, Maintenance, and Technical Services Committee certification of the final negotiated fee relative to the Professional Services Agreement with Communications Performance Group, Inc. for design of an Integrated Emergency Response Plan (Specification No. P-166), be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed, and approved; and, -9- 10/25/95 FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 95-104, approving said agreement with Communications Performance Group, Inc. for said services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor, including overhead, plus fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $125,000.00 for the 1995-96 fiscal year, and a total cost not to exceed $312,232.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS (OMTS95-045) Authorizing an increase in Districts' expenditure for in-house laboratory analyses supporting the Joint Ultraviolet Pilot Proiecl with Orange County Water Districts Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to increase Districts' expenditures for in-house laboratory analyses supporting the Joint Ultraviolet Pilot Project with Orange County Water District, increasing the Districts' cost for direct labor and material for an additional amount of$17,000.00, increasing the total authorized amount from $40,000.00 to an amount not to exceed $57,000.00. ALL DISTRICTS (PDC95-31) Approving, in concept, the Partnering Charter and the Value Engineering Clause to the contract with Margate Construction. Inc.. for Job No. P1-36-2 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Partnering Charter and the Value Engineering Clause to the contract with Margate Construction, Inc. for Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36-2, be, and is hereby, approved in concept. ALL DISTRICTS (OMTS95-041) Approve, in concept. construction of Compressed Natural Gas Refueling Station, Job No. P1-51 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the construction of a Compressed Natural Gas Refueling Station, Job No. P1-51, be, and is hereby, approved in concept; and, -10- 10/25/95 FURTHER MOVED: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to loan reserve funds in the 1995-96 budget to build the station; and, FURTHER MOVED: That staff be, and is hereby, directed to establish an enterprise report for future review. ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR95-25) Adopting Resolution No. 95-105. Repealing Resolution No 95-54, Pertaining to Classification. Compensation and Other Terms, Conditions. Rules and Regulations of Employment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 95-105, repealing Resolution No. 95-54 Pertaining to Classification, Compensation, and Other Terms, Conditions, Rules and Regulations of Employment, reflecting changes occurring in legislation and labor law, and required insurance coverages. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR95-38) Authorizing staff to solicit bids for a Professional Services Agreement re Financial Information System Project (Specification No. P-1671 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to solicit bids for a Professional Services Agreement for the Financial Information System Project, for completion of Phase III, Selection Process for Hardware and Software; and, Phase IV, Implementation and Acceptance of the Selected Hardware and Software Solutions (Specification No. P-167), -11- 10/25/95 ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR95-40) Authorizing staff to neaotiate Amendment No. 2 to the Aareement between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 13 and County Sanitation District No. 14 re Purchase and Sale of Capacity Rights in Treatment. Disposal, and Sewer Facilities Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to negotiate Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 & 13 and County Sanitation District No. 14 for Purchase and Sale of Capacity Rights in Treatment, Disposal and Sewer Facilities, providing for District No. 14's annual flow to be based upon actual average flow per day for the four highest months, and providing capacity for higher winter month flows. ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR95-41) Receive and file monthly reports of Pacific Investment Management Company Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the monthly investment report and staff report regarding performance monitoring of Pacific Investment Management Company be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR95A2) Actions re Establishing Policy for Microcomputer Acquisitions Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the policy that all PC technology purchases be limited to the most recent list of Tier 1 and Tier 2 vendors as defined by The Gartner Group, for both desktop computers and mobile computers, be, and is hereby, declared; and, FURTHER MOVED: That a policy that all purchasing actions relating to the purchase of PC technology utilize the California Multiple Award Schedule (CMAS) contracts for the purchase of PC technology from among the Tier 1 and Tier 2 vendors as defined by Gartner Group; and authorizing staff to compare CMAS pricing to choose the lowest priced Tier 1 and Tier 2 vendor's configuration applicable to the Districts' needs, be, and is hereby, declared. -12- 10/25/95 Authorizino staff to issue a Purchase order to Dell Computer (Specification No. E-261) Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue a purchase order to Dell Computer for the Purchase of 60 Personal Computers and Monitors and Other Associated Components (Specification No. E-261) for a total amount not to exceed $208,900.00, plus sales tax. Director Mark A. Murphy requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR9543) Establishing a Relief Ooerator bonus Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 95-106, authorizing the establishment of a Relief Operator bonus of$0.60 per hour for employees covered by the Operations and Maintenance Memorandum of Understanding. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Request for review and recommendations regarding implementation of time clocks for Districts' staff Director Gullixson expressed concern regarding time management of Districts' staff and the possibility of implementing time clocks. It was then moved that a study be completed by the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee on the issue of time clock implementation. The motion failed to pass. ALL DISTRICTS Status of the Strategic Plan The Assistant General Manager of Operations gave a brief report and, using slides, illustrated the timeline for the strategic plan. -13- 10/25/95 ALL DISTRICTS Actions relative to the Proposed acquisition of County of Orange Integrated Waste Management System Verbal Report by Assistant General Manager of Operations The Assistant General Manager of Operations gave a brief report and update on the feasibility of acquiring the County of Orange Integrated Waste Management System. Authorizing staff and consultants to conduct expanded Phase 1 Assessment Studies Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to conduct expanded Phase I Assessment Studies on moderate and high exposure landfill sites, to be done within the previously authorized amount of$100,000,00. Authorizing consulting services far Phase II Assessment Study Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That consulting services for Phase II Assessment Study to determine landfill assets and liabilities for an amount not to exceed $100,000.00, be, and are hereby, authorized. Authorizing staff to issue letter of interest to enter into negotiations for Purchase of the County of Orange Integrated Waste Management System Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue a letter of interest to enter into negotiations to develop an agreement between the County of Orange and the Districts for the purchase and sale of the County of Orange Integrated Waste Management System; and, -14- 10/25/95 That an amount not to exceed $100,000.00 in nonrefundable payments, be, and is hereby, authorized to be applied toward the purchase price; that said contract provide that the County will enter into negotiations with the County Sanitation Districts and will not enter into contract negotiations with any other entity, either public or private, for a period of nine (9) months. The County shall also provide to the Sanitation Districts any and all unsolicited offers, proposals, or solicitations of offers made to the County. Said contract to further provide that the $100,000.00 shall be refunded to the extent of 50% provided a final agreement for the purchase and sale of the facilities is made and entered into between the parties. Director Victor Leipzig requested that his opposition to this item be made a matter of record. Director Pat McGuigan requested that her abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. ALL DISTRICTS Status report re County's Commingled Investment Pool Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager of Operations, and Tom Woodruff, General Counsel, gave a brief report on the status of the Orange County Commingled Investment Pool and the County of Orange bankruptcy. ALL DISTRICTS General Counsel's comments Prior to Closed Session General Counsel reported to the Directors the need for a closed session as authorized by Government Code Section 54956.9 to discuss and consider the item specified as Item 16(b)(4) on the published Agenda. General Counsel also indicated a need to add one item needing immediate action that arose subsequent to the publication of the agenda. He reported that additional items could be added pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2(b) upon a two- thirds vote of the Directors. No other items would be discussed or acted upon. ALL DISTRICTS Add Item to the Closed Session Agenda Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Item 16(b)(5) to confer with General Counsel re County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California, vs. E. L. Yeager Construction Company, at al, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 732578, be added to the Agenda. -15- 10/25/95 ALL DISTRICTS Convene in Closed Session pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 The Boards convened in closed session at 9:02 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Boards of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. No action was taken re Agenda Item Nos. 16(b)(1), (2), and (3). ALL DISTRICTS Reconvene in regular session At 9:14 p.m., the Boards reconvened in regular session. ALL DISTRICTS County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. California, vs. E. L. Yeager Construction Company, at al.. Orange County Superior Court Case No. 732578 General Counsel reported that during closed session, the Boards Directors acted to authorize General Counsel to accept a settlement proposal of Defendant E. L. Yeager Construction Company prior to or at time of trial, if in accordance with the terms and conditions established by the Boards. ALL DISTRICTS Actions re Supplemental Agenda Item relative to Summons and Complaint for Inverse Condemnation, Edward T. Reid vs. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 752065 Authorizing consideration of Supplemental Agenda Item relative to Summons and Complaint for Inverse Condemnation, Edward T. Reid vs. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 752065 -16- 10/25/95 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby authorize consideration of a supplemental agenda item relative to Summons and Complaint for Inverse Condemnation, Edward T. Reid vs. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 752065, which was not posted 72 hours prior to the Board meeting date because the request to take said action arose subsequent to the agenda being posted. Receive and file Summons and Complaint for Inverse Condemnation, Edward T. Reid vs. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 752065 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Summons and Complaint for Inverse Condemnation, Edward T. Reid vs. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 752065, in connection with the Santa Ana River widening project with the County of Orange, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Districts' General Counsel be, and is hereby, authorized to appear and defend the interests of the Districts. DISTRICT 1 Approving Settlement Agreement with Alphanetics. Inc. and Francisco Lopez Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Settlement Agreement with Alphanetics, Inc. and Francisco Lopez, for administrative penalties in the amount of$42,000.00 for wastewater discharge violations, be, and is hereby, approved, in a form approved by General Counsel. -17- 10/25/95 DISTRICT 1 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:14 p.m. DISTRICT 2 Actions re Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Trunk Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-R1 Approving Change Order No. 3 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing an addition of$7,398.80 to the contract with Colich Bros., Inc. dba Colich & Sons, for one item of additional work, and granting a time extension of 30 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. Approving Chance Order No. 4 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Change Order No. 4 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a net deduction of $109,637.60 from the contract with Colich Bros., Inc. dba Colich & Sons, be, and is hereby, approved. Accepting Contract No. 2-9-Rl as complete Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 95-107-2, accepting Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Trunk Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-R1, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion, and approving Final Closeout Agreement for a final total contract amount of$2,657,809.81. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -18- 10/25/95 DISTRICT 2 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:14 p.m. DISTRICT 3 Adioummenl Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:14 p.m. DISTRICT 5 Adioumment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjoumed. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:14 p.m. DISTRICTS 6. 7 & 14 Actions re Baker-Gisler Interceptor. from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1 AA Aooroving Change Order No. 3 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing an addition of$39,734.90 to the contract with Mladen Buntich Construction Co., Inc., for five items of additional work, and granting a time extension of 33 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. -19- 10/25/95 Approving Change Order No. 4 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Change Order No. 4 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing an addition of$209,090.78 to the contract with Mladen Buntich Construction Co., Inc., for nine items of additional work, and granting a time extension of 39 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. AAoDrovino Change Order No. 5 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Change Order No. 5 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a net addition of$36,059.00 to the contract with Mladen Buntich Construction Co., Inc., be, and is hereby, approved. Accepting Contract No. 14-1-1A as complete Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 95-108, accepting Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-1A, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion, and approving Final Closeout Agreement for a final total contract amount of$8,810,715.81. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 6 Adiournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:14 p.m. -20- 10/25/95 DISTRICT 7 Loyd Nitzen Y. County Sanitation Districts, OCSC Case No. 712847 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Special Legal Counsel be, and is hereby, authorized to accept Plaintiffs settlement proposal. DISTRICT 7 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:14 p.m. DISTRICT 11 AAjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:14 p.m. DISTRICT 13 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:14 p.m. -21- 10/25/95 DISTRICT 14 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:14 p.m. Secretary of B ss of�s of County Sa ' a o istricts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, , 11, 13 and 14 -22- FUND NO 9199 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9114195 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBERAP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 09/20/95 POSTING DATE 09/20/95 WARRANTNO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION - 147022 ACGIH,INC. $312.14 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 147023 AG TECH COMPANY $55,729.65 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10.9-91 147024 ATM AA,INC. $4,485.00 LAB SERVICES 147025 AT&T-BUSINESS LONG DISTANCE SERVICE $5.00 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 147026 A-2 LOGIC SYSTEMS $233.64 MACHINE REPAIRS 147027 ACCOUNTANTS OVERLOAD $220.50 TEMPORARY PERSONNEL SERVICES 147028 ACTION DOOR REPAIR CORP. $340.76 DOOR REPAIRS 147029 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS.INC. $445,687.81 CONSTRUCTION P1-38-1 147030 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS,INC. $4,600.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 147031 AIR COLD SUPPLY,INC. $164.74 AIR CONDITIONER REPAIRS 147032 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $18,037.20 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.O.B-94I9 147033 ALLIED ELECTRONICS $106.54 INSTRUMENT PARTS 147034 AMERICAN PROTECTIVE SER.,INC. $1,252.34 CONTRACT SECURITY SERVICES 147035 AMERICAN SIGMA $1.119.52 LAB SUPPLIES 147036 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION $12,461.82 SEWER REPAIRS 147D37 ANALYSTS,INC. $1,657.49 MECHANICAL PARTS 147038 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL $330.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 147039 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $2.626.12 NOTICES&ADS TT1 147040 APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS,INC. $1,376.35 LAB SUPPLIES X 147041 ABC LABORATORIES $3.830.00 LAB SERVICES ._. 147042 AQUATIC SIOSYSTEMS,INC. $235.00 LAB SERVICES I= 147043 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT $1.268.50 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 147044 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. $80.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL n 147045 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $3.924.00 PAYROLL SERVICES 147046 AWARDS&TROPHIES $162.79 PLAQUES 147047 BKK LANDFILL $2.509.03 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10.9-91 147048 BANANA BLUEPRINT $4.223.40 PRINTINGM.O.11.07.94 147049 BATTERY SPECNLTIES $1.929.29 BATTERIES 147050 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS.INC. $4,276.31 LAB SUPPLIES 147051 BENZ ENGINEERING,INC. $270.95 COMPRESSOR PARTS 147052 WT BILLARD,INC. $249.60 BUILDING REPAIRS 147053 810-GRO DIVISION $45,695.77 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0A-26-95 147054 BOOT BARN $113.03 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 147055 THE BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFFAIRS $1.411.63 HUMAN RESOURCES PUBLICATION 147058 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. $289.21 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 147057 C.L TECHNOLOGY $720.00 GAS ANALYSIS SERVICES 147058 CS COMPANY $2.455.08 HARDWAREIPLUMBING SUPPLIES 147059 CALTEX PLASTICS,INC. $1,071.00 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 147060 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $1.755.86 OFFICE FURNITURE 147061 CENTURY SAFETY INST.&SUPPLY $8.186.93 SAFETY SUPPLIES 147062 CHEMICAL ENGINEERING $50.00 SUBSCRIPTION 147063 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $87.28 SERVICE AGREEMENT 147054 COLE-PALMER INSTRUMENT CO. $821.87 LAB SUPPLIES 147065 COLICH&SONS $323,189.50 CONSTRUCTION 1147-1 147066 COMPUSERVE $246.20 COMPUTER SERVICES 147057 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $839.04 ELECTRIC PARTS FUND NO 9199 - Ji DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9114195 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 09rM95 POSTING DATE 09/20/95 WARRANT NO, VENDOR AMOUNT 147060 CONSUMER PIPE $918.59 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 147069 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC. $338.76 TOOLS 147070 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $1.249.20 ENGINE PARTS 147071 COUNTY CLERK $342.00 CEQA FEES 147072 COUNTY CLERK $35.00 CEGA FEES 147073 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $2,510.12 ELECTRIC PARTS 147074 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $4,064.00 STATE UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 147075 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $200.00 ANNEXATION FEE 147076 DAILY PILOT $144.00 NOTICES&ADS 147077 HSK/DECKER $404.91 INSTRUMENT PARTS 147078 DE GUELLE&SONS GLASS CO. $462.01 GLASS 147079 DELL COMPUTER CORP. $10,556.06 COMPUTER HARDWARE 147080 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIF. $47.435.78 DENTAL INSURANCE PLAN M.O.1-12-94 147081 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $2,050.00 COMPUTER TRAINING 147082 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $W0.00 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 147083 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $1,781.00 PAINT SUPPLIES 147084 DYCAM,INC. $1,505.40 COMPUTER PARTS 147085 ESP NORTH 52,070.52 SECURITY SUPPLIES X 147086 EASTMAN,INC. Swim OFFICE SUPPLIES 147087 EMPIRE SCALES CO. $32.65 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 147088 ENCHANTER,INC. $3,500.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5-24-95 to 147089 ENVIROGEN,INC. $5.029.00 BIOTRICKLING FILTER PROJECT o--i 147090 FMC CORPORATION $102,204.91 HYDROGEN PEROXIDE M.0.9-1 M84 1 a 147091 FST SAND AND GRAVEL,INC. $532.49 ROAD BASE MATERIALS 147092 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $6.322.50 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 N 147093 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $501.00 AIR FREIGHT 147094 FISCHER&PORTER CO. $1,761.27 STRIP CHART PAPER 147095 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $2,317.40 LAB SUPPLIES 147096 FISIONS INSTRUMENTS $879.44 LAB SUPPLIES 147097 FLICKINGER CO. $1,637.58 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 147098 FLOSYSTEMS,INC. $8.954.88 PUMP PARTS 147099 FOSS MARITIME CO. $88.20 FREIGHT CHARGES 147100 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $164.87 PHOTO SUPPLIES 147101 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $321.23 PAINT SUPPLIES 147102 FOUR WHEEL PARTS WHOLESALER $339.73 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 147103 THE FOXBORO CO. $1,737.83 INSTRUMENT PARTS 147104 FRANCE COMPRESSOR PRODUCT 3727.87 COMPRESSOR PARTS 147106 FRAZEE PAINT&WALCOVERING $189.10 PAINT SUPPLIES 147106 FRY'S ELECTRONICS $98.81 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 147107 OST,INC. $2.078.72 OFFICE SUPPLIES 147108 GTE TELEPHONE OPERATIONS $12.053.00 RELOCATE TELEPHONE SYSTEM AT PLANT 2 147109 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $116.37 CHEMICALS 147110 GENERAL ALUMINUM FORGINGS $117.39 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 147111 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $3,898.80 ELECTRIC PARTS 147112 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $248.45 TELEPHONE SERVICES 147113 GENICOM CORPORATION $839.00 PRINTING SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9114195 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 09/20/95 POSTING DATE 0920/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 147114 GIERLICH-MRCHELL,INC. $1,053.79 PUMP PARTS 147115 N.GLANTZ&SON,INC. $570.07 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 147116 GOLDEN BELL PRODUCTS $301.70 CLEANER 147117 GRAPHIC CONTROLS $235.46 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 147118 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $229.38 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 147119 GRASSY S.T.I. $2,497.85 ENGINE PARTS 147120 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $1,678.99 PRINTING 147121 DGA CONSULTANTS $11,343.49 ENGINEERING SERVICES 3-35R 147122 DAVID R.GRIFFIN $176.033.02 LEGAL SERVICES-TECHITE PIPE M.O.9-14-94 147123 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $1.037.64 TRUCK PARTS 147124 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $487.74 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 147125 PL HAWN CO,INC. $6,403.58 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 147126 HELPMATES PERSONNEL SERVICES $1,151.20 TEMPORARY PERSONNEL SERVICES 147127 HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT $2.083.33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN. 147125 HEWLETT PACKARD CO. $3.496.60 SERVICE AGREEMENT 147129 HILTI,INC. $839.05 FITTINGS 147130 RC HOFFMAN AND/OR ISCO $100.17 MACHINE REPAIRS 147131 HOME DEPOT $233.85 HARDWARE M 147132 IRS HUGHES CO,INC. $790.70 SIGNS X 147133 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $1.178.25 WATER USE ._. 147134 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $22.036.13 PERMIT FEES DO 147135 HYCLONE LABORATORIES $733.63 LAB SUPPLIES .� 147135 IPCO SAFETY $6,200.98 SAFETY SUPPLIES 147137 IMPERULL WEST CHEMICAL $98,610.35 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11-18-92 D 147138 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $807.90 CONNECTORS LN 147139 INTUMVE TECHNOLOGY $16,195.00 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 147140 J2 PRINTING SERVICES $604.48 PRINTING 147141 AT COMPUTER SOURCE,INC. $3,025.62 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 147142 JAMISON ENGINEERING,INC. $1.362.34 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 147143 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY. $357.06 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 1471" JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO. $1,001.20 GAUGE 147145 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $154.18 ELECTRIC PARTS 147146 JONES CHEMICALS.INC. $16,261.35 CHEMICALS 147147 KALLEEN'S COMPUTER PRODUCTS $175.01 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 147148 KING BEARING,INC. $304.85 MACHINE SUPPLIES 147149 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $161.48 HARDWARE 147150 L A CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $383.27 SERVICE AGREEMENTS 147151 LAW/CRANDAL,INC. $1,675.00 SOIL TESTING 7-13-94 147152 LIMRORQUE CORP. $819.66 ELECTRIC REPAIRS 147153 THE LITIGATION GROUP $6.609.56 POST-TRIAL INTERVIEW-TECHITE PIPE 147154 LOCAL AGENCY $500.00 ANNEXATION FEES 147155 MPS $26.83 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 147156 MACOMCO $464.10 SERVICE AGREEMENT 147157 MANDIC MOTORS $149.00 TOWING SERVICES 147158 MANHOLE ADJUSTING $7.900.00 MANHOLE ADJUSTING SERVICES 147159 MANLETS BOILER REPAIR CO,INC. $978.75 BOILER REPAIRS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9114195 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0920195 POSTING DATE 09/20/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 147160 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $66.23 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 147161 MASONEILAN N.AMER,OPERATIONS $3,553.60 INSTRUMENT PARTS 147162 MCMAHAN DESK,INC. $1.139.46 OFFICE FURNITURE 147163 MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. $1,407.44 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 147164 MICRO MOTION $5.186.36 INSTRUMENT PARTS 147165 MICROBIAL INSIGHTS,INC. $150.00 CONSULTING SERVICES M.O.11.18-92 147166 MICROBICS CORPORATION $856.08 OCEAN MONITORING 147167 MIDWAY MFG.&MACHINING $7,370.97 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 147168 MINNESOTA WESTERN VISUAL PRIES. $557.69 LAS SUPPLIES 147169 MISSION ABRASIVE SUPPLIES $553.20 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 147170 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3,848.97 UNIFORM RENTALS 147171 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO. $861.00 ELECTRIC PARTS 147172 MONITOR LABS $931.32 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 147173 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $380.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES 147174 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $674.80 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 147175 NEUTRON $7.014.50 ANIONIC POLYMER M.O.8-10.94 147176 NEW HORIZONS COMPUTER CENTER 54,800.00 COMPUTER TRAINING CLASSES 147177 NICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY $306.71 INDUSTRIAL GREASE m 147178 OFFICE PAVIUONSIINTERIOR RESOURCES $599.09 OFFICE FURNITURE REPAIRS X 147179 OLE LEE,INC. $69.27 TRUCK PARTS 147100 OMEGA CORP, $375.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 00 147181 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $7,400.44 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 147182 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. $472.30 LAB SUPPLIES 147183 OXYGEN SERVICE $2,737.21 SPECIALTY GASES n 147104 COUNTY OF ORANGE $401.50 PERMIT FEES 1 1471B5 PSI $117.06 HARDWARE r 147188 PSSI $7,280.95 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION 147107 PACIFIC CLIPPINGS $126.70 NEWSPAPER CLIPPING SERVICES 147188 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $5,925.79 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 147189 PACIFIC PARTS $5,677.09 INSTRUMENT PARTS 147190 PACIFIC BELL $43.18 TELEPHONE SERVICES 147191 PAGENET $901.21 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 147192 FAME WEBBER $42.020.83 COP REMARKETING FEES 147193 PAKWEST $1,370.16 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 147194 PARTS UNLIMITED $809.12 TRUCK PARTS 147195 PENINSULA PUMP CORP. 54,978.08 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 147195 PERMIT SEAL $182.89 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 147197 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $5.484.84 REIMS.PETTY CASH,TRAINING&TRAVEL 147198 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $120.305.70 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3-29-96 1471" PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS $315.72 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 147200 POLYPURE,INC. 522,416.41 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3.11-92 147201 POTTORFF COMPANY $54.53 ELECTRIC PARTS 147202 POWER SYSTEMS TESTING CO. $1,24&99 ELECTRICAL TESTING 147203 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $160.00 ICE 147204 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE IND. 52,280.00 SOIL TESTING 147205 PUSUC SECTOR EXCELLENCE $5,000.00 TRAINING CATALOG DEVELOPMENT&PRODUCTION FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/14195 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 09f20/95 POSTING DATE 09/20195 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 147208 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $410.69 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS 147207 R&R INSTRUMENTS $2.496.36 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 147208 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $2,062.75 TRASH REMOVAL 147209 REDWINGSHOES $206.88 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 147210 REMEDY TEMP $2.490.84 TEMPORARY PERSONNEL SERVICES 147211 RM MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL $236.43 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 147212 ST ANDREWS MACHINE CO. $86.20 MACHINE REPAIRS 147213 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS $975.50 ELECTRIC PARTS 147214 SANTA ANA PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL E2,22IA3 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 147215 SANTA FE BAG CO. $297.55 OPERATING SUPPLIES 147216 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $551.68 SPECIALTY GASES 147217 SEA COAST DESIGNS $3.012.23 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 147210 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $1,833.58 HARDWARE 147219 SHURELUCK SALES $66.85 HARDWARE 147220 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO. $132.37 LAB SUPPLIES 147221 SKILL PATH,INC. $356.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING REGISTRATION 147222 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $250.12 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 147223 M LEE SMITH PUBLISHERS&ASSOC. $387.00 CA SAFETY&HEALTH MONITOR SUBSCRIPTION f71 X 147224 SNAP-OWSUN CORP. $1,521.37 INSTRUMENT 2 147225 SO COAST AIR QUALITY $150.00 PERMIT FEES by 147226 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY $1.315.60 PERMIT FEES .. 147227 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. $10.553.02 POWER --4 147228 SO.CAL GAS.CO. $2,783.07 NATURAL GAS n 147229 SO.CALIF.WATER CO. - $54.65 WATER USE 147230 SOUTH SHORE $3,0113.33 WINDOWWASHINGSERVICES 147231 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER $2,929.34 DRINKING WATER/COOLER RENTALS 147232 WESTALLOY,INC. $463.97 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 147233 SPECIALIZED PRODUCTS CO. $1,090.91 TOOLS 147234 SPECTRON&ASSOCIATES $306.25 LAB SUPPLIES 147235 STERUNGART $90.95 OFFICE SUPPLIES 147236 SUPELCO,INC. $168.65 LAB SUPPLIES 147237 SUPERB ONE-HOUR PHOTO $11.31 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 147238 SUPER CHEM CORP. $408.82 CHEMICALS 147239 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $680.12 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 147240 TEKMAR COMPANY $700.86 LAB SUPPLIES 147241 TEL-A-TRAIN,INC. $195.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING REGISTRATION 147242 TELE-CELL,INC. $1.628.25 TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT 147243 THOMAS BROS MAPS 54,000.00 PRINTING 147244 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $497.15 MECHANICAL PARTS 147245 TONER SYSTEM INTERNATIONAL $1,400.21 PRINTING SUPPLIES 147246 TONY'S LOCK&SAFE SERVICE $82.55 LOCKS&KEYS 147247 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE,INC. $644.35 SAFETY SUPPLIES 147240 TREBOR ELECTRONICS $682.68 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 147249 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $216.94 TRUCK PARTS 147250 TRUESDAIL LABS $6,587.00 LAB SERVICES 147251 JG TUCKER&SON,INC. $28.32 INSTRUMENT PARTS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/14195 PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 09l MS POSTING DATE 09120V95 WARRANT NO, VENDOR 147252 20TH CENTURY INSURANCE CO. $3,369.27 LIABILITY CLAIM 147253 U.S.AUTO GLASS CENTERS $70.31 TRUCK PARTS 147254 US RENTALS $135.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 147255 UNISOURCE&/OR BUTLER PAPER $336.40 OFFICE SUPPLIES 147256 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $500.42 PARCEL SERVICES 147257 VWR SCIENTIFIC 5627.03 LAB SUPPLIES 147258 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $3.314.87 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 147259 VARIABLE SPEED DRIVES $1.495.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS - 147260 VARIAN ASSOCIATES,INC. $685.06 LAB SUPPLIES 147261 WEFTEC'95 $605.00 BIOSOLIDS RECYCLING CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 147262 WACKENHUT CORP. $1,038.75 SECURITY SERVICES 147263 WAL-CON CONSTRUCTION CO. $121,326.87 CONSTRUCTION 5.37-3 147264 WARRINGTON $115.00 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS 147285 WATERS CORPORATION $8.489.48 LAB SUPPLIES 147266 WAXIE $1.087.86 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 147267 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $11,260.16 CAUSTIC SODA&HYPOCHLORIDE M.O.8.12-92&4.13.94 147280 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $988.65 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 147269 XEROX CORP. $1,074.09 COPIER LEASES X 147270 YELLOW SPRINGS INSTRUMENT CO. $54.74 INSTRUMENT PARTS = 147271 JOHNSON YOKOGAWA CORP. 52,373.69 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 00 TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 9/20/95 $2,090,326.06 a m FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/14195 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 092025 POSTING DATE 09/20/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR SUMMARY AMOUNT #1 CONSTR FUND $6,317.55 02 OPER FUND 33.50 42 CONSTR FUND 14,289.03 #3 OPER FUND 37.355.15 #3 CAP FAC FUND 182,849.13 #3 CONSTR FUND 14,032.44 #5 OPER FUND 16,024.16 45 CAP FAC FUND 14.41 #5 CONSTR FUND 2,172.50 #6 CONSTR FUND 1,232.01 #7 OPER FUND 4,620.15 #7 CAP FAC FUND 579.72 #7 CONSTR FUND 2,129.00 #11 OPER FUND 10,576.78 m #11 CAP FAC FUND 324,080.56 x #11 CONSTR FUND 1,528.31 s #13 CONSTR FUND 47.18 p7 014 CAP FAC FUND 1.675.00 014 CONSTR FUND 217.52 95&6 CAP FAC FUND 121.382.77 D JT OPER FUND 620.187.44 v CORF 500,310.70 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND 52.888.38 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL 115.727.22 $2.090.326.06 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 09/28/95 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10104/95 POSTING DATE 10/04/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 147292 A-1 FENCE CO INC. E630.00 GATE REPAIR 147293 ACWAGAARY SURVEY $120.00 SALARY B BENEFITS SURVEY 147294 AG TECH COMPANY $56.609.93 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.1D9-91 147295 ASL CONSULTING ENGINEERS $1.807.50 ATWOOD SUBTRUNK PLAN PREPARATION 147296 ATM AA,INC. $150.00 LAB SERVICES 147297 A T&T-CELLULAR CR&R $1.67 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 147298 ACADEMIC PRESS $356.05 PUBLICATIONS 147299 ACCU-SLUDGE $480.99 LAB SUPPLIES 147300 - ADVANCED COOLING TECHNOLOGY $243.41 ELECTRICPARTS 147301 AIR LIOUIDE AMERICA CORP. $2,245.00 SPECIALTY GASSES 147302 ALHAMBRA FOUNDRY CO LTD $3,769.10 MANHOLE FRAMES&COVERS 147303 ASCE CONTINUING EDUCATION $402.50 SAFETY VIDEO PROGRAM 147304 AMERIDATA $851.23 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 147305 AMERICAN METAL BEARING CO $1,038.75 BEARINGS 147306 AMERICAN PROTECTIVE SERVICE,INC. $326.40 SECURITY SERVICE 147307 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION $5,229.25 SEWER REPAIRS 147308 SLAKE P ANDERSON $171.88 CELLULAR PHONE REIMBURSEMENT 147309 ANIXTER-DISTRIBUTION $1.298.02 COMPUTER SUPPLIES M 147310 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $1.702.88 NOTICES 8 ADS Z 147311 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $952.45 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 147312 ABC LABORATORIES $1,395.00 LAB SERVICES W 147313 ARMOR-VAC $1.660.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 147314 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE,INC. $6,208.00 TOXIC WASTE REMOVAL 147315 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. $60.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL �i 147316 ASSOCIATED CONCRETE PRODUCTS $174.56 BUILDING MATERIALS 147317 ATKIN/!ONES COMPUTER SERVICE $321.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT 147318 AWARDS 8 TROPHIES $14.09 PLAQUES 147319 BFI MEDICAL WASTE SYSTEMS $4.00 WASTE DISPOSAL 147320 BANCROFT-WHITNEY CO.. $139.00 PUBLICATION 147321 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $120.25 BATTERIES 147322 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $3.317.73 LAB SUPPLIES 147323 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $431.30 TRUCK WASH TICKETS 147324 910-GRO DIVISION $52,443.84 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 4.26-95 147325 BLAIR-MARTIN CO,INC. $513.13 VALVE MANIFOLDS 147325 BOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE S468.70 TRUCK REPAIRS 147327 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $17.035.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7.10 147328 BUDGET JANITORIAL $3,330.00 JANITORIAL SERVICES MO 1-12-94 147329 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. $52.14 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 14733D BUSH 8 ASSOCIATES,INC. $15,332.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6.8.94 147331 CALFON CONSTRUCTION $28.839.67 CONSTRUCTION 7-22 8 7-24 147332 CALTROL,INC. $1.965,26 HARDWARE 147333 CALIFORNIA AUTO COLLISION,INC. $1,198.08 TRUCK BODY REPAIR 14733M CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $1,450.87 SERVICE AGREEMENT 147335 COS MOVING EQUIPMENT $320.02 PLASTIC TOTE BOXES 147336 CAMALI CORP. $400.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 147337 CANUS CORPORATION 538,378.38 FIBER OPTIC CABLE FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 09I28195 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10MV95 POSTING DATE 10/04/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 147338 CARLETON ENGINEERS $1,260.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES-AIR QUALITY 147339 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $10,964.79 ENGINEERING SERVICES P138,3.33 147340 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $275.11 OFFICE FURNITURE 147341 CENTURY SAFETY INST.B SUPPLY $4,199.06 SAFETY SUPPLIES 147342 CERFNET $32.50 COMPUTER SERVICES 147343 CHROME CRANKSHAFT,INC. $980.00 PUMP PARTS 147344 CLEMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL $14.708.05 CONSULTANT-LANDFILL PROJECT M07-31-95 147345 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $153.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 147346 COASTALMOTION $1,332.D0 SEMI-ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP FEE 147347 COLE-PALMER INSTRUMENT CO. $150.69 LAB SUPPLIES 147348 COMPUSA,INC. $578.83 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 147349 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $5,447.40 ELECTRIC PARTS 147350 CONSUMER PIPE $1.354.43 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 147351 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC. $977.81 TOOLS 147362 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $2,235.59 ENGINE PARTS 147353 COUNTERPART ENTERPRISES $1,497.04 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 147354 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $514.02 ELECTRIC PARTS 147355 D.T.I. $50.00 CHEMICALS M 147358 DE GUELLE 8 SONS GLASS DO $300.00 SAFETY GLASS X 147357 DEZURIK AND/OR CS CO. $4.521.19 VALVES 147368 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $8.109.33 OFFICE EQUIPMENT W 147359 DISPOSABLE WASTE SYS.B OR JWC ENVIRONMENTAL 9244.31 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 147360 ESP NORTH $112.81 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 141351 EASTMAN,INC. $2,706.62 OFFICE SUPPLIES Lv 147362 EDWARDS DIV.OF GS BLDG SYS. $02.35 SERVICE AGREEMENT N 147363 EMERGENCY MGMT NETWORK 8520.00 CPRIFIRST AID TRAINING 147364 ENCHANTER,INC. $4,200.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.624-95 147MS ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $1,011.70 LAB SERVICES 147368 FST SAND AND GRAVEL,INC. $769.35 ROAD BASE MATERIALS 147367 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $50.00 AIR FREIGHT 147368 FIBERTRON $1.192.01 FIBER OPTIC CABLE 147369 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $151.21 FILTERS 147370 FIRST CHOICE $389.54 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT 147371 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $101.42 LAB SUPPLIES 147372 FISONS INSTRUMENTS $11,527.35 SERVICE AGREEMENT 147373 CLIFFORD A.FORKERT $625.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.8-8-94 147374 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $7.62 PHOTO SUPPLIES 147375 FREEDOM IMAGING 889.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 147376 FRY'S ELECTRONICS $6,450.05 ELECTRONIC 8 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 147377 CST,INC. $210.38 OFFICE SUPPLIES 147378 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $1.670.25 LUMBEROiARDWARE 147379 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $8,696.42 TELEPHONE SERVICES 14738D GIERLICH-MITCHELL,INC. $7,110.12 PUMP PARTS 147381 BEVERLY MAY GILLIAM 11395.18 PAYROLL DEDUCTION REIMBURSEMENT 147382 GOVT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOC. $55.00 PUBLICATIONS 147383 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $1.077.29 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 09/28195 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 1004195 POSTING DATE 10104t95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 147384 GRASBY S.T.I. $857.00 ENGINE PARTS 147385 DGA CONSULTANTS $10.707.77 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.841.94 147386 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $428.03 TRUCK PARTS 147357 HACH COMPANY $2,939.22 LAB SUPPLIES 147388 HATCH&KIRK,INC. $309.69 TRUCK PARTS 147389 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS $4,055.00 CONTAINER RENTALS 147390 HELPMATES PERSONNEL SERVICES $1.036.08 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 147391 HEWLETTPACKARD $53.88 SERVICEAGREEMENT 147392 HOLMES&NARVER,INC. $36.972.96 ENGINEERING SERVICES MO 9.14-94 147393 HOME DEPOT $64.62 HARDWARE 147394 IRS HUGHES CO,INC. $665.90 PAINT SUPPLIES 147395 IPCO SAFETY $3,485.49 SAFETY SUPPLIES 147396 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $79,552.98 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11-18.92 147397 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $1,080.25 CONNECTORS 147398 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. $571.01 TRUCK PARTS 147399 CLEAN AIR REPORT $565.00 PUBLICATION 1474W INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $673.82 BATTERIES 147401 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $67.02 WATER USEAGE X 147402 J2 PRINTING SERVICES $321A0 PRINTING = 147403 JAMES INSTRUMENTS,INC. $1,827.00 ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT 147404 JAMISON ENGINEERING $1,586.98 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES CO 147405 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY. $203.86 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 1 147406 KENNEDY HYDRAULICS $431.59 MOTOR REPAIRS to 147407 KING BEARING,INC. 84,933.03 MACHINE SUPPLIES 1 147408 KLEINFELDER $1.552.95 GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTING SERVICES %A 147409 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $6,765.60 TOOLS 147410 LASERALL CORP. $1.034.81 PRINTER REPAIR 147411 LEE&RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC. $5.297.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES 147412 JAMES E.LENIHAN COMPANY $12.700.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 147413 LEWCO ELECTRIC $77.27 TRUCK PARTS 147414 LIMITORQUE CORP. 52,863.19 ELECTRIC PARTS 147415 SOCO-LYNCH CORP $117.68 JANITORIAL SERVICES 147416 MACOMCO $464.10 SERVICE AGREEMENT 147417 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $285.255.00 CONSTRUCTION P242-2 147410 MCKENNA ENGR.&EQUIP. $272.40 PUMP PARTS 147419 MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. $903.78 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 147420 MIDWAY MFG.&MACHINING $225.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 147421 MISSION INDUSTRIES $4,601.30 UNIFORM RENTALS 147422 MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION $38,369.36 CONSTRUCTION I4IAA 147423 MORE4AND&ASSOCIATES $15,843.50 AUDITING SERVICES MO 3E-95 147424 MORTON SALT $416.57 SALT 147425 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION $461.75 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL FEE 147420 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $70.35 SAFETY FILM RENTALS 147427 NEUTRON $5,254.08 ANIONIC POLYMER M.O.0-10-94 147428 NEW HORIZONS COMPUTER CENTERS,INC. $4.800.00 SOFTWARE TRAINING CLASSES 147429 NICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY $1.514.76 LUBRICANTSIDIESEL FUEL FUNDNO 9199 - J7 GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 0928195 PAGE4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10/04/95 POSTING DATE 1001/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 147430 NORTEL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS $57.63 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS 147431 OI CORPORATION $871.90 LAB SUPPLIES 147432 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES 5452.79 SAFETY GLASSES 147433 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION . $7.18 OFFICE SUPPLIES 147434 ORACLE CORPORATION $14,287.65 SOFTWARE 147435 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL $1,420.73 CHEMICALS 147436 ORANGE COUNTY FARM SUPPLY $852.36 CHEMICALS 147437 ORANGE COURIER $96.00 COURIER SERVICES 147438 ORANGE VALVE A FITTING CO. $575.78 FITTINGS 147439 OXYGEN SERVICE 57,283.70 SPECIALTY GASES 147440 COUNTY OF ORANGE $735.00 USER FEE CHANGE PROCESSING 147441 CSDOC WORKERS COMP INSURANCE ACCOUNT $2,146.69 WORKERS COMPENSATION REIMBURSEMENT 147442 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $1,259.95 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 147443, PACIFIC PARTS $28,260.58 INSTRUMENT PARTS 147444 PACIFIC BELL $1,354.18 TELEPHONE SERVICES 147445 PASCAL&LUDWIG.INC. $51.191.00 CONSTRUCTION P1436.2 147446 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $7,890.77 REIMS.PETTY CASH,TRAINING B TRAVEL 147447 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $107,365.50 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.329.95 M 147448 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS $22.750.00 CONSULTING SERVICE x 147449 PITNEY BOWES $83.69 POSTAGE METER TAPE 147450 POLYMETRICS,INC. $1,252.75 LAB SUPPLIES W 147451 POLYPURE,INC. $34,023.08 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3.11.92 147452 POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO. $660.40 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 141453 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $160.00 ICE FOR SAMPLES 147454 PROMINENT FLUID CONTROL,INC. $799.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 147455 REISH MARINE STUDIES,INC. $960.00 OCEAN MONITORING 147456 RELIANCE ELECTRIC $1,575.82 ELECTRIC PARTS 147457 REMEDYTEMP 57,830.40 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 147458 RM MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL AND/OR RITTAL $169.63 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 147459 ROSEMOUNT ANALYTICAL,INC. $860.42 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 147460 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS $487.75 ELECTRIC PARTS 147461 SANTA FE BAG CO. $243.11 FREIGHT 147462 SANWABANK $6,086.42 CONSTRUCTION 14-1-1A 147463 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTL $221.921.19 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6844 147464 R.CRAIG SCOTT&ASSOC. $8.922.40 LEGAL SERVICES-PERSONNEL ISSUES 147465 SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS,INC. $232.00 LAB REPAIRS 147466 SELCO PRODUCTS CO. $413.58 METER CONNECTOR 147467 SENTIENT SYSTEMS,INC. $10.800.00 FACILITATOR SERVICES-EXECUTIVE RETREAT 147468 SHAMROCKSUPPLY $46.11 TOOLS 147469 SHURELUCK SALES 52,724.55 TOOLS/HARDWARE 147470 SMITH-EMERY CO. $405.00 SOIL TESTING M.0.7-13.94 147411 WALTER SMITH B ASSOCIATES $899.00 EMMISSIONS WORKSHOP 147472 SOUTH COAST WATER $160.00 LAB SUPPLIES 147473 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. $70,765.05 POWER 147474 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $2,183.29 NATURAL GAS 147475 STAMEN Z.SPASSOFF P.E. $12,800.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19.2 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0912W195 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID IGM"5 POSTING DATE 1001/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR . AMOUNT 147476 SPECIAL PLASTIC SYSTEMS,INC. $110.71 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 147477 SPECIALIZED PRODUCTS CO. $110.03 OFFICE TOOLS 147470 SPICERS PAPER $85.10 OFFICE SUPPLIES 147479 SUMMIT STEEL $339.41 METAL 147480 TEKTROND(,INC. E1,285.71 INSTRUMENT PARTS 147481 TELEDYNE ANALYTICAL $153.31 INSTRUMENT PARTS 147482 THEODORE ROBBINS FORD $2.909.24 VEHICLE RENTAL-SUMMER PROGRAM 147483 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $1.462.89 MECHANICAL PARTS 1474M TONYS LOCK&SAFE SERVICE $90.63 LOCKS&KEYS 147485 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $74.01 TRUCK PARTS 147486 TRUESDAIL LABS E150.00 LAB SERVICES 147487 JG TUCKER&SON,INC. $3,291.18 INSTRUMENT PARTS 147488 USA BLUE BOOK $358.34 PUBLICATION 147489 UNISOURCEWOR BUTLER PAPER $442.81 OFFICE SUPPLIES 147490 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE E53.61 PARCEL SERVICES 147491 UNITED VAN LINES,INC. $8.584.80 RELOCATION SERVICES 147492 VWR SCIENTIFIC $998.83 LAB SUPPLIES 147493 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $2.33 PLUMBING SUPPLIES fTl 147494 VALLEY DETROIT DIESEL $1,153.46 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES X 2 147495 VERNE'S PLUMBING E265.00 PLUMBING SERVICES W 147496 VERTE)(SYSTEMS $1,836.00 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT 147497 WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION $257.45 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT COURSES 147498 WAKIE $5,533.70 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES pp 147499 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $10.970.50 CAUSTIC SODA&HYPOCHLORIDE M.O.8-12.92&4-13-94 I 147500 ROURKE,WOODRUFF 8 SPRADLIN $124,885.82 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.2-19.92 147501 YELLOW SPRINGS INSTRUMENT CO. $63.79 LAB SUPPLIES 147502 RICHARD YOUNG PRODUCTS $410.29 INSTRUMENT PARTS TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 10/04/95 E1,694,367.04 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 09/28195 PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10/04r95 POSTING DATE 10/04/95 SUMMARY AMOUNT #1 OPER FUND $225.00 42 OPER FUND $3,725.95 02 CAP FAC FUND $38,780.46 03 OPER FUND $34.380.66 #3 CAP PAC FUND $46,873.04 #5 OPER FUND $11,818.76 #7 OPER FUND $6.136.01 97 CAP FAC FUND $55.867-66 #11 OVER FUND $86IA3 911 CAP FAC FUND - $15,000.45 #14 OPER FUND $762A7 #14 CAP FAC FUND $47,689.66 #5&6 OPER FUND $2.741.69 #5&6 CAP FAC FUND $1,354.37 #6&7 OPER FUND $2,930.72 #7&14 OPER FUND $5,643.39 JT OPER FUND $797,137.03 CORF $461,765.16 m SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $25.857.34 X IT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $135.017.29 2 81,694,367.04 L71 lb O� FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10/05/95 PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10/O6M5 POSTING DATE 10/D5195 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 147503 ACORN CONSULTING $1,430.00 CONSULTING SERVICES $1,430.00 SUMMARY AMOUNT JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $1,430.00 91,430.00 m x x w --1 be V -� JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 15, 1995 Agenda Item (8). Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts (each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District). Summary See attached listing of claim payments. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of payment of claims listing. 11 W P W C19SAG BSwO V 95111 G9 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10/13/95 PAGE 1 +� REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID IWIB195 POSTING DATE 10/18195 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 147528 AG TECH COMPANY $51.669.45 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.1041.91 147529 A T&T-PRO WATTS $2,710AS LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 147630 A-Z LOGIC SYSTEMS $293.03 LAB SUPPLIES 147531 ABRASIVE ENG.TOOLING&EQUIP. $213.67 HARDWARE 147632 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $54,111.60 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.O.8.9A9 147533 ALHAMBRA FOUNDRY CO LTD S4,85&53 MANHOLE FRAMES&COVERS 147534 ALTA-ROBBINS $3B8.40 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 147536 AMERICAN AIR FILTER,INC. $1.867.94 MECHANICAL PARTS 147636 AMERICAN AIRLINES $4.596.76 TRAVEL SERVICES 147537 AMOCO ENERGY TRADING $43,880.03 NATURAL GAS MO&2&95 147538 ANGEL SCIENTIFIC S649.47 LAB SUPPLIES 147539 ANIXTER-DISTRIBUTION $4,745.34 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 147640 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $2,649.85 NOTICES&ADS 147541 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT $2,914.39 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 147542 ARROWHEAD ELECTRIC CORP. $03.64 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 147543 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. $60.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL 147544 ATKIWJONES COMPUTER SERVICE $321.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT 147545 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $3.383.70 PAYROLL SERVICES 147646 AWARDS&TROPHIES $152A2 PLAQUES 147647 BANANA BLUEPRINT $3,021.74 PRINTING M.0.11.07-94 147548 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $964.78 BATTERIES 147549 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $1,430.32 LAB SUPPLIES 147550 BENZ ENGINEERING,INC. $184.60 COMPRESSOR PARTS 147551 BIO-GRO DIVISION $50.500.26 RESIDUALS REMOVAL NO 4-28-95 147552 BISHOP'S SANITARY $252.14 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 147553 BLOOMBERG L.P. $4,832.59 FINANCIAL MONITORING M.O.4-14-93 147554 BOOTBARN $96.88 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 147555 BROADWAY MOTEL $272.29 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 147656 CS COMPANY $4.714.93 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 147557 CWEA 1995 SRTC $440.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 14755B CADIRECTION $11,340.80 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 147559 CALFON CONSTRUCTION $167.695.11 CONSTRUCTION 7-22&7-24 147560 CALTROL,INC. $1,231.18 HARDWARE 147561 CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL STATISTIC $400.00 DIRECT&OVERLAPPING DEBT STATEMENT 147562 CANUS CORPORATION $49,862.39 FIBER OPTIC CABLE 147563 CAPITAL WESTWARD $47.56 MECHANICAL PARTS 147564 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $1,827.62 ENGINEERING SERVICES 147565 CENTURY SAFETY INST.&SUPPLY $2,073.85 SAFETY SUPPLIES 147566 COLS-PARMER INSTRUMENT CO. $280.01 LAB SUPPLIES 147567 COUCH&SONS $140,000.00 CONSTRUCTION 11-17.1 147565 CONNELL GM PARTS/DIV. $173.97 TRUCK PARTS 147569 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $2.412.10 ELECTRIC PARTS 147570 CONSUMER PIPE $11513.21 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 147571 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC. $4.755.42 TOOLS 147572 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $863.43 ENGINE PARTS 147573 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $510.13 TRUCK PARTS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10/13/95 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10118195 POSTING DATE 101IMS WARRANTNO. VENDOR AMOUNT 147574 COUNTY CLERK $25.00 EXEMPTION FEE 147575 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $1,032.55 ELECTRICPARTS 147576 CHARLES P-CROWLEY.CO. $689.95 INSTRUMENT PARTS 147577 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION $214.59 - UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE FEE 147578 DAVEB BICYCLES,INC. $269.12 BIKE REPAIRS 147579 DE GUELLE&SONS GLASS CO $61.87 SAFETY GLASS 147680 DELTA PACKAGING PRODUCTS.INC. $347.00 LAB SUPPLIES 147581 DEZURICKANDIORCSCO. $10.956.02 VALVES 147662 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $940.00 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 147583 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $265.84 PAINT SUPPLIES 147554 D'VALS SALES $364.47 FITTINGS 147585 ECONOMICS PRESS,INC. $45.50 SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL 147506 EDWARDS HIGH VACUUM INTER. $79.75 LAB SUPPLIES 147587 ELECTRO TEST,INC. $6,010.00 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 147588 ENCHANTER,INC. $4.200.00 OCEAN MONITORING MO 5-24.95 147559 FMC CORPORATION $61,357.76 HYDROGEN PEROXIDE MO 9.14-94 147590 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $2.195.00 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 10.9-91 147591 FISCHER&PORTER CO. $620.96 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 147692 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $1,333.95 LAB SUPPLIES 147593 PLAT&VERTICAL,INC. $126.00 CONCRETE CUTTING 147594 FLO-SYSTEMS $1.310.55 PUMP PARTS 147595 CLIFFORD A FORKERT $2.606.00 SURVEYING SERVICES MO 66-94 147596 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $107.46 PHOTO SUPPLIES 147597 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $17,468.92 WATER USE 147598 THE FOXBORO CO. $227.26 INSTRUMENT PARTS 147599 FRY'S ELECTRONICS $1.609.60 ELECTRONIC&COMPUTER SUPPLIES 147600 CITY OF FULLERTON $246.76 WATER USE 147601 GST,INC. S2A523.21 OFFICE SUPPLIES 147602 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $192.53 LUMBER/HARDWARE 1476D3 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $2,545.59 CHEMICALS 1476M GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1,039.85 TELEPHONE SERVICES 147605 GIERLICH44ITCHELL.INC. $2,111.13 PUMP PARTS 147605 GRASBYS.T.I. $3,966.77 ENGINE PARTS 147607 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $8.204.89 PRINTING 147608 BEA CONSULTANTS $650.00 SURVEYING SERVICES NO 641-94 147609 HB TYPE&GRAPHICS $282.31 PRINTING 147610 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $70.90 TRUCK PARTS 147611 HARBOUR ENGINEERING $15.571.00 MECHANICAL PARTS 147612 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $544.12 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 147613 HAWKINS ASSOCIATES $1,040.00 LAB EQUIPMENT 147614 PL HAWN CO,INC. $696,67 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 147615 HELPMATES PERSONNEL SERVICES $1,036.08 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 147616 HEWLETT PACKARD $805.98 LAB SUPPLIES 147617 HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL $102.40 WORKERS COMP CLAIM 147618 HOLMES&NARVER,INC. $71,830,31 ENGINEERING SERVICES MO 9A4-94&3-8-95 147619 HOME DEPOT $1,640.88 HARDWARE FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10113195 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10118195 POSTING DATE 10/18195 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 147620 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $694.71 PAINT SUPPLIES 147621 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $21.00 WATER USE 147622 IDEXX $144.24 LABSUPPLIES 147623 IPCO SAFETY $14,879.34 SAFETY SUPPLIES 147624 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $81,752.50 FERRIC CHLORIDE MO II-18-92 147625 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $412.31 BATTERIES 147626 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $4.90 WATER USE 147627 IRVINE SCI-TECH BOOKS $165.88 PUBLICATIONS 147628 J.D.I.TECHNOLOGIES $611.96 PRINTER PARTS 147629 JIT COMPUTER SOURCE,INC. $1,492.34 SOFTWARE 147630 JACK CHANGE $107.70 FLOOR JACK 147631 JAMISON ENGINEERING $16,892.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 147632 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $1,457.66 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 147633 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $966.78 ELECTRIC PARTS 147634 JONES CHEMICALS,INC. $17,097.48 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE MO4-2645 147635 KEYE PRODUCTIVITY CENTER $790.00 INVENTORY SEMINAR 147636 KEYE PRODUCTIVITY CENTER S139A0 WAREHOUSE MANAGEMENT SEMINAR 147637 KIMMERLE BROS.INC. $392.81 MECHANICAL PARTS 147636 KING BEARING,INC. $756.90 MACHINE SUPPLIES 147639 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $1.020.69 TOOLS 147640 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $1.292.08 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICE . 147641 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY CO. $178.07 SAFETY SUPPLIES 147642 LEE&RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC. $19.568.80 ENGINEERING SERVICES MO 5-24-95&12-8-93 147643 K.P.LINDSTROM,INC. $7.190.95 ENVIR.CONSULTING SERVICES MO 12.9-90 147644 LUSTRE-CAL $612.95 SAFETY 147646 MBC APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL $70.75 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6.10-92 147646 MDT BIOLOGIC COMPANY $242.43 LAB SUPPLIES 147647 MPS $436.93 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES - 147648 MANGAN,INC. $1,612.00 CONTRACT SERVICES 147649 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $60.13 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 147650 MATT-CHLOR,INC. $212A9 FERRIC CHLORIDE SUPPLIES 147651 MCBAIN INSTRUMENTS $420.00 LAB SUPPLIES 147652 MCCROMETER $603.89 METER PARTS 147653 MCMAHAN DESK,INC. $48.11 SAFETY SUPPLIES 147654 MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. $412.41 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 147655 METROSONICS,INC. $8.124.35 ELECTRICAL PARTS 147656 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3,460.56 UNIFORM RENTALS 147657 MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION $202,513.37 CONSTRUCTION W14A 147658 MONITOR LABS $808.43 INSTRUMENT 147659 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES $1.437.50 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 147660 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $1,555.31 PLUMBING SUPPLIES ' 147661 NEW HORIZONS COMPUTER CENTERS,INC. $4.200.00 SOFTWARE TRAINING CLASSES 147662 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $6.87 WATER USE 147663 HICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY $1,O85.26 LUBRICANTSIDIESEL FUEL 147664 NORM'S REFRIGERATION&ICE EQUIPMENT $23.81 ELECTRICAL PARTS 147665 NORTEL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS $2,764,00 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10/13195 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10/18/95 POSTING DATE 10/18195 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 1476M OI CORPORATION $316.67 LAB SUPPLIES 147667 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $169.00 SAFETY GLASSES 147668 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $4.252.97 OFFICE SUPPLIES 147669 OMEGA CORPORATION $375.00 SECURITY SYSTEM REPAIRS 147670 ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING SERVICEJNC. $600.00 LINE STRIPING 147671 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $1,010.48 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 147672 ORANGE RESOURCE RECOVERY SYSTEM $32.01 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 147673 ORANGE VALVE B FITTING CO. $1,122.23 FITTINGS 147674 OXYGEN SERVICE S3,120A4 SPECIALTY GASES 147675 COUNTY OF ORANGE 5210.00 USER FEE CHANGE PROCESSING 147678 CSDOC WORKERS COMP INSURANCE ACCOUNT 514,129.87 WORKERS COMPENSATION REIMBURSEMENT 147677 COUNTY OF ORANGE $401.00 PERMITS 147678 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT $25.004.50 GAP WATER USE NO 6-9.93 147679 PSI REPAIR SERVICES,INC. $484.17 INSTRUMENT PARTS 147680 PSOC(POOL SUPPLY OF OC) $165.41 OPERATING SUPPLIES 147681 PSSI $3,232.80 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION 147682 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $2B7.26 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 147683 PACIFIC PARTS $34.416.24 INSTRUMENT PARTS 147684 PACIFIC BELL $131Z4 TELEPHONE SERVICES 147685 PAGENET $1.030.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 1476% PEABODY $2,389,14 PUMP PARTS 147687 DR.C.H.PETERSON $8.500.00 OCEAN MONITORING WORKSHOP 147686 CSDOC PETTY CASH ACCOUNT $12,439,32 REIMS.PETTY CASH,TRAINING B TRAVEL 147689 THOMAS M.PIKE JR $7.500.00 PROPERTY APPRAISAL 147690 THE PLANNING REPORT $199.00 SUBSCRIPTION 147691 POLYPURE,INC. $19.066.89 CATIONIC POLYMER MO 3-11-92 147692 POWDERCOAT SERVICES Y4 $156.24 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 147693 POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO. $71.39 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 147694 PROCESS EQUIPMENT COMPANY $2,402.94 PUMP PARTS 147695 PROFESSIONAL MOBILE REMODELING $19.143.00 CONTRACT SERVICES 147696 PUTZMEISTER,INC. $1,728.03 PUMP PARTS 147697 RJN COMPUTER SERVICES,INC. $17.655.00 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 147698 RB R INSTRUMENTS $1,599.16 ELECTRIC PARTS 147699 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $2.112.75 TRASH REMOVAL 147700 THE REGISTER $711.20 NOTICES 8 ADS 147701 REMEDYTEMP $924.63 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 147702 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $3.988.32 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 147703 HOWARD RIDLEY.CO. $1,600.00 CONTRACT SERVICE 147704 RM MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL AND/OR RTTTAL $33.92 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 147705 ROSEMOUNT ANALYTICAL,INC. $160.32 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 14T706 SAFETY WEST SI.881.07 INSTRUMENT PARTS 147707 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $44D.23 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 147708 SANWA BANK $10.658.60 CONSTRUCTION 14-1-IA 147709 BASCO ELECTRIC 58,955.00 CONTRACT SERVICES 147710 SCHWIND AMERICA.INC. $1,132.27 PUMP PARTS 147711 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $364.50 SPECIALTY GASES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10/13/95 PAGES ' REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10/18/95 POSTING DATE 10MMS WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 147712 SETON NAME PLATE CO. $85.95 LAB SUPPLIES 147713 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $2,905.55 TOOLS 147714 SHURELUCK SALES $8,848.41 TOOLS44ARDWARE 147715 SIMS WELDING SUPPLY $365.00 DEMURRAGE 147716 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $1,166.20 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 147717 SMITH-EMERY CO. $526.50 SOIL TESTING NO 7A3.94 147718 SMITH PIPE&SUPPLY $297.34 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 147719 SOIL&PLANT LABORATORY $47.00 SOIL TESTING 147720 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. $47,634.66 POWER 147721 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $24,261.33 NATURAL GAS 147722 SO.CALIFORNIA MARINE INST. $800.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 147723 SPARUNG INSTRUMENT CO.,INC. $146.19 METER 147724 SPECIALIZED PRODUCTS CO. $345.14 OFFICE TOOLS 147725 SPEX CHEMICAL&SAMPLE PREP $336.22 LAB SUPPLIES 147726 STERLING ART $15.61 ART SUPPLIES 147727 SUMMIT STEEL $888.94 METAL 147728 SUNSETFORD $352.60 TRUCK PARTS 147729 SUPER CHEM CORP. $404.07 CHEMICALS 147730 SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS $544.00 SUBSCRIPTION 147731 SUPER POWER PRODUCTS $205.88 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 147732 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $184.32 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 147733 TELE-CELL,INC. $5,427.83 TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT 147734 THEODORE ROBBINS FORD $226.32 VEHICLE RENTAL-SUMMER PROGRAM 147735 THOMPSON PUBLISHING GROUP $238.OD PUBLICATION 147736 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $2,124.56 MECHANICAL PARTS 147737 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE,INC. $7.736.45 TRUCK PARTS 147738 TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY,INC. $3.973.84 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING MO 5-11.94 147739 TRUESDAIL LABS $5,083.76 LAB SERVICES 147740 JG TUCKER&SON.INC. $11,895.66 INSTRUMENT PARTS 147741 U.S.AUTO GLASS CENTERS $154.00 TRUCK PARTS 147742 UDI/MCGRAW-HILL $170.55 PUBLICATION 147743 VWR SCIENTIFIC $2,124.71 LAB SUPPLIES 147744 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $211.46 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 147745 VERNE'S PLUMBING $1,775.00 PLUMBING SERVICES 147746 VERTEX BUSINESS INTERIORS $1,293.00 OFFICE FURNITURE 147747 VERTEX TECHNOLOGIES,INC. $1.494.13 FIBER OPTICS 147748 VERTEX SYSTEMS 52,295.00 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT l 147749 V&E TREE SERVICE,INC. $750.OD GROUNDSKEEPING 147750 WACKENHUT CORP. $6,982.90 CONTRACT SERVICESECURITY GUARDS NO 8-23.95 147751 WAL-CON CONSTRUCTION CO. $42,716.22 CONSTRUCTION 547-3 147752 WARRINGTON $115.00 SERVICEAGREEMENT 147753 WAXIE $7,594.86 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 147754 SKIPWESTCOTT $650.00 METER REPAIR 147755 WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCTS $631.45 SAFETY SUPPLIES 147756 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $50.448.61 CAUSTIC SODA MO 8.23-95 147757 WEST-CITE SUPPLY CO. $777-85 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - IT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 10113195 PAGE6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10/18/95 POSTING DATE 10/18/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR 147758 XEROX CORP. $23,496.31 COPIER LEASES 147759 YORK INTERNATIONAL $47.62 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 147760 RICHARD YOUNG PRODUCTS $474.89 INSTRUMENT PARTS TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 10/18/95 $1.767.508.64 SUMMARY AMOUNT #2 OPER FUND $783.39 42 CAP FAC FUND $20,952.16 #3 OPER FUND $38,368.90 #3 CAP FAC FUND $5.550.90 #5 OPER FUND $3.092.17 #5 CAP FAC FUND ST74.00 #7 OPER FUND $3,063.56 #7 CAP FAC FUND $167.830.43 #11 OPER FUND $10,973.78 #11 CAP FAC FUND $140.012.37 #14 CAP FAC FUND $213,199.03 #3&11 OPER FUND $1,437.50 #5&6 CAP FAC FUND $42,738.90 #7&14 OPER FUND $794.77 JT OPER FUND $658.050.82 CORF $191,170.21 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $14,232.27 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $254,453.48 $1,767.508.64 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1024/94 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 1024/95 POSTING DATE 1024/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 147781 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $119,358.63 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3-29-95 TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 10/24/95 $119.358.63 SUMMARY AMOUNT JT OPER FUND $119,358.03 $119.358.63 FUND NO 9199 - JTDISTWORKINGCAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10/27/95 PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 11/01/96 POSTING DATE 11/01/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 147782 ATM AA,INC. $1,124.54 LAB SERVICES 147783 AT&T-MEGACOM SERVICE $967.80 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 147784 ABANNER IDEA $600.17 COMMUNICATIONS SUPPLIES 147785 ACORN CONSULTING $6,175.00 CONSULTING SERVICES 147786 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $18.037.20 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.O1-&69 147787 AIR PERMIT REPORT $446.00 SUBSCRIPTION 147788 ALBERTSONS MARKET#604 $1,135.88 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 147789 AMERIDATA $6,362.94 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 147790 AMERICAN SIGMA $242.66 OPERATING SUPPLIES 147791 AMOCO ENERGY TRADING CORP. $68.300.76 NATURAL GAS M.O.6-28-95 147792 CIYOFANAHEIM $24,987.00 INSPECTION SERVICES-CONTRACT 3-35R 147793 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION $13,587.56 SEWER REPAIRS 147794 BLACE P.ANDERSON $113.01 REIMBURSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE 147795 ANIXTER-DISTRIBUTION $698.21 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 147796 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL $330.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 147797 AQUATIC BIOASSAY&CONSULTING $4,895.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 147798 ARMOR-VAC $300.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 147799 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE,INC. $1,241.60 RECYCLABLE MATERIAL REMOVAL 147800 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. $60.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL 147801 ASSOCIATED CONCRETE PRODUCTS $174.56 BUILDING MATERIALS 147802 AMSA $1,000.00 WORKSHOP REGISTRATION-TECHNICAL 147803 ATKINSON FLUID POWER $451.68 HYDRAULIC MOTOR 147804 BKK LANDFILL $5.027.31 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO.10-9-91 147805 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $677.75 - BATTERIES 147806 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $10,570AS LABSUPPLIES 147607 BEACH PAVING,INC. $500.00 PAVING REPAIRS 147808 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $495.40 TRUCK WASH TICKETS 147809 BETA MONITORS INTERNATIONAL $190.52 MONITOR REPAIRS 147810 BIO-GRO DIVISION S41,084.90 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.4-26-95 147811 BIOMERIEUX VITEK,INC. $558.00 LAB SUPPLIES 147812 BIOSPHERICAL INSTRUMENTS,INC. $133.00 LAB SUPPLIES 147813 BLACK BOX CORP. $157.01 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS 147814 BLUE RIBBON,INC. $4,318.00 FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES 147815 BOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE $1.670.99 TRUCK REPAIRS 147816 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $892.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 147617 BUDGET JANITORIAL $8,660.00 JANITORIAL SERVICES M.O. 1-12-94 147818 THE BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFFAIRS $1,486.00 SUBSCRIPTION ' 147819 BUSH&ASSOCIATES,INC. $14,024.00 SURVEYING SERVICESM.0.6-6-94 147820 BUSINESS PUBLISHERS,INC. $351.00 SUBSCRIPTION 147021 CLEAN WATER REPORT $275.54 PUBLICATION 147022 C.L.TECHNOLOGY $1."0.00 GAS ANALYSIS SERVICES 147823 CS COMPANY $2,260.16 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 147824 CALIFORNIA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE $382.55 TRAINING REGISTRATION-TECHNICAL 147826 CALIFORNIA WATER AWARENESS $250.00 MEMBERSHIP FEES 147826 CAPITAL WESTWARD CORP. $137.88 MECHANICAL PARTS 147827 CAREER TRACK SEMINARS $98.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION-TECHNICAL FUND NO 91M - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10M7195 PAGE 2 _ P REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 11101195 POSTING DATE 11/01195 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 147628 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $40,981.94 ENGINEERING SERVICES P"8,J-33-2 147829 CENTURY PAINT $229.59 PAINT SUPPLIES 147830 CENTURY SAFETY INST.&SUPPLY $2,665.75 SAFETY SUPPLIES 147831 CERTEX ELECTRONICS,INC. $1,153.94 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS 147832 CERTIFIED TRANSPORTATION $250.25 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 147M CHEM SEARCH $1.681.98 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 147834 COLD SAWS OF AMERICA.INC. $81.41 TOOLS 147835 COMPETENT CARE,INC. $320.00 MEDICAL RESPONSE SERVICES 147836 COMPUSERVE $28B.20 COMPUTER SERVICES 147837 CONNELL GM PARTS I DIV. $130.11 TRUCK PARTS 147838 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $9,717.19 ELECTRIC PARTS 147839 CONSUMER PIPE $20SAI MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 147840 CONSUMER TERMITE CONTROL,INC. $1,150.00 PEST CONTROL SERVICES 147841 CONTINENTAL EQUIP&SUPPLY $1,476.39 HARDWARE 147842 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS O C $310.00 CONSULTING SERVICES M.0.8-11-93 147843 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $3.751.95 ENGINE PARTS 147844 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $5,075.22 ELECTRIC PARTS 147845 CUMMINS CAL PACIFIC,INC. $209.88 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 1478M STATE OF CALIFORNIA $99.76 WASTE DISPOSAL FEES 147847 MARCEL DEKKER,INC. $166.48 PUBLICATION 147848 DELL COMPUTER CORP. $40.297.66 COMPUTER HARDWARE 147849 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIF. S32,652.06 DENTAL INSURANCE PLAN M.0.1-12-84 147850 DE2URICK AND/OR CS CO. $3.843.41 VALVES 147851 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $4,166.63 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 147852 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $7.092.39 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 147853 DUHIG&CO.,INC. $84.62 VALVES 147854 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $412.57 PAINT SUPPLIES 147855 EC&M SEMINARS $295.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION-TECHNICAL 147666 ESP NORTH $63.95 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 147857 EASTMAN,INC. $394.79 OFFICE SUPPLIES 147858 EBERHARD EQUIPMENT $266.85 TRUCK PARTS 147859 ECOANALYSIS,INC. $4.901.50 CONSULTING SERVICES 1478M EDWARDS HIGH VACUUM INTER. $634.21 LAB SUPPLIES 147861 ELSEVIER SCIENCE PUBLISHING $550.00 SUBSCRIPTION 147862 EMED $385.30 ELECTRIC PARTS 147863 EMERGENCY MGMT NETWORK $1,230.00 CPRIFIRST AID TRAINING 147864 ENCHANTER,INC. $4.900.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5.24-95 147865 ESSCO PUMPS AND CONTROLS $554.63 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 147866 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $867.70 LAB SERVICES 147887 FLUID TECH.SALES $815.92 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 1478M FMC CORPORATION $67.993.60 HYDROGEN PEROXIDE M.0.9-14-94 147869 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $19,988.37 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.D. 10.9-91 147870 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $1,224.70 AIR FREIGHT 147671 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $2.087.50 LAB SUPPLIES 147872 FISIONS INSTRUMENTS $1.286.75 LAB SUPPLIES 147873 CLIFFORD A FORKERT $4.405.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-&95 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10R7M5 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 11/01/95 POSTING DATE 11/01/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 147874 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $141.97 PHOTO SUPPLIES 147875 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $223.09 PAINT SUPPLIES 147876 FRIGIDARE COMMERCIAL PROD. $240.30 ELECTRIC PARTS 1478T7 FRYS ELECTRONICS 33,655.95 ELECTRONIC&COMPUTER SUPPLIES 147878 CST,INC. $9.087.26 OFFICE SUPPLIES 147879 GAMMA PLASTICS $787.57 OPERATING SUPPLIES 1478M GARRATT-CALIAHAN COMPANY $112.06 CHEMICALS 147881 GAINES ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $4.148.37 ELECTRIC PARTS 147882 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $1,473.84 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 147863 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $6,747.77 TELEPHONE SERVICES 1478M GIERLICH-MITCHELL,INC. $13,893.59 VALVES 147885 GILLESPIE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $13,483.75 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 147886 WIN GRAINGER,INC. $479.58 ELECTRIC PARTS 147887 GRASSY S.T.I. $3.874.55 ENGINE PARTS 147888 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC WHOLESALE $250.28 COMMUNICATIONS SUPPLIES 147889 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $749.62 PRINTING 14789D DGA CONSULTANTS $13,799.34 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.8-23-95&M.O.6894 147891 DR.ROGER H.GREEN $5.405.36 OCEAN MONITORING 147892 HR EFFECTIVENESS,INC. $495.00 PUBLICATION 147893 HB TYPE&GRAPHICS $2.003.88 PRINTING 147894 HARBOUR ENGINEERING $12.985.56 PUMP PARTS 147B95 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $143.49 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 147896 HATCH&KIRK,INC. $607.00 FILTERS 147897 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS $2.210.00 CONTAINER RENTALS 147898 HAWKINS ASSOCIATES $77723 LAB SUPPLIES 147899 PL HAWN CO,INC. $12025 FILTERS 14790D HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT $2.003.33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN. 147901 HILT,INC. $2.576.94 TOOLS 147902 DR,DAVID E.HINTON $1,219.00 OCEAN MONITORING 147903 IRS HUGHES CO, INC. S533.60 PAINT SUPPLIES 147904 HYDROTEX S2,981.09 MECHANICAL PARTS 147905 IPCO SAFETY $1.121.78 SAFETY SUPPLIES 1479DS IMAGING PLUS,INC. $743.72 OFFICE SUPPLIES 147907 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $79.572.27 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11-1&92 147908 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $5D9.31 CONNECTORS 147909 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $305.68 BATTERIES 147910 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $67.68 WATER USE 147911 J.D.I.TECHNOLOGIES,INC. $76.46 PRINTING SUPPLIES 147912 AT COMPUTER SOURCE,INC. $1,675.52 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 147913 JAMISON ENGINEERING,INC. S/8,B61.DD CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 147914 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY. $1,013.G4 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 147915 JAYS CATERING $186.46 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE 147916 JOHNSON CONTROLS $1.950.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION-TECHNICAL 147917 KALLEENS COMPUTER PRODUCTS $975.80 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 147918 FRANCES L.KALUZNY $1.360.00 HUMAN RESOURCES CONSULTING 147919 KEYE PRODUCTIVITY CENTER $139.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION-TECHNICAL FUNDNO 9199 - 1T DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 1=7/95 PAGE4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 11/01/95 POSTING DATE 11/01/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 147920 KING BEARING,INC. $1,815.44 MACHINE SUPPLIES 147921 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $185.44 SAFETY SUPPLIES 147922 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $3,412.31 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICE 147923 THE LANE COMPANY $1.535.00 - MECHANICAL REPAIRS 147924 LEE&RO CONSULTING ENGR. $4.578.46 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-38-5 147925 MDT BIOLOGIC COMPANY $936.00 LAB SUPPLIES 147926 MEC ANALYTICAL SYSTEMS,INC. $26,484.00 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 147927 MPS $94.58 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 147928 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS,INC. $1,354.57 TOOLS 147929 MANTEK $596.31 GROUNDSKEEPING SUPPLIES 147930 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $808.275.00 CONSTRUCTION P242-2 147931 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $261.54 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 147932 MASONELIAN N.AMER.OPERATIONS $58.72 INSTRUMENT 147933 MATT-CHLOR,INC. $605.35 FERRIC CHLORIDE SUPPLIES 147934 MCLEAN MIDWEST $242.20 ELECTRIC PARTS 147935 MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. $337.27 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 147938 MIDWAY MFG.&MACHINING $2,015.22 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 147937 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3,082.32 UNIFORM RENTALS 147938 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO. $465.00 ELECTRIC PARTS 147939 MONITOR LABS $120.68 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 147940 MORELAND&ASSOCIATES $7,811.50 AUDITING SERVICES M.D.3895 147941 MOTOROLA CELLULAR $367.95 CELLULAR TELEPHONE PARTS 147942 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $1,199.78 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 147843 NEW HORIZONS COMPUTER CENTERS,INC. $4,200.00 SOFTWARE TRAINING CLASSES 1479" CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $77.04 WATER USE 147945 OI CORPORATION $213.97 LAB SUPPLIES 147946 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $2,431.35 OFFICE SUPPLIES 147947 ON TECHNOLOGY $2,900.50 OFFICE EQUIPMENT - 147948 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO. $2.255.31 CHEMICALS 147949 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $1,689.13 ELECTRIC PARTS 147950 ORANGE COURIER $96.60 COURIER SERVICES 147951 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. $5.013.75, FITTINGS 147952 ORITEX CORP. $1,469.58 MECHANICAL PARTS 147953 OSCARS LOCK&SAFE $64.35 LOCK REPAIRS 1479M OXYGEN SERVICE $1,323.03 SPECIALTY GASES 147955 COUNTY OF ORANGE $435.00 ADMINISTRATIVE FEES 147956 COUNTY OF ORANGE $5.882.92 SERVICE AGREEMENT 147957 COUNTY OF ORANGE $17.50 PERMITS 147958 COUNTY OF ORANGE $4.840.00 UNDERGROUND TANK FEES 147959 PSI $393.13 MECHANICAL PARTS 147960 PSSI $1,184.85 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION 147961 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $1,429.47 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 147962 PACIFIC PARTS $39.855.71 INSTRUMENT PARTS 147963 PACIFIC BELL $1.345.17 TELEPHONE SERVICES 147964 PALMIERI.TYLER.WIENER. $180.00 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.6-12-91 147965 PARAGON CABLE $73.56 CABLE SERVICES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10127MS PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 11/01/95 POSTING DATE 11/01/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 147966 PARALLAX EDUCATION 9900.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION -MANAGEMENT 147967 PARKHOUSE TIRE,INC. $1,216.31 TIRES 147968 PARTS UNLIMITED $582.20 TRUCK PARTS 147969 PASCAL 8 LUDWIG $11,305.35 CONSTRUCTION P142 147970 PERFORMANCE SURVEY CORP. $1.421.82 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 147971 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $8,165.03 REIMB.PETTY CASH,TRAINING 8 TRAVEL 147972 PIMA ORO SYSTEMS,INC. $97.461.90 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3.29.95 147973 PITNEY BOWES $303.05 SERVICE AGREEMENT 147974 POLYMETRICS,INC. $1,262.75 LAB SUPPLIES 147976 POLYPURE,INC. 327,934.83 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92 147976 POSITIVE FORMULATORS,INC. $197.20 CHEMICALS 147977 POSTAGE BY PHONE $5.000.00 POSTAGE 147978 POST CONSUMER PRODUCTS 9460.50 COMMUNICATIONS SUPPLIES 147979 POWER SYSTEMS $68.16 MECHANICAL PARTS 147980 POWERTECH ENGINES,INC. $260.17 TRUCK PARTS 147981 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $176.00 ICE FOR SAMPLES 147982 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE IND. $44.00 SOIL TESTING 147983 PROMINENT FLUID CONTROL,INC. $799.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 147964 PUBLIC SECTOR EXCELLENCE $3,510.00 TRAINING CONSULTANT 147965 QUICKSTART TECHNOLOGIES $750.00 CONSULTING SERVICES 147986 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $1,781.14 PUMP PARTS 147987 RB R INSTRUMENTS $169.59 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS 147988 RED WING SHOES $1,380.06 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 147989 REISH MARINE STUDIES,INC. $1,140.00 OCEAN MONITORING 147990 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $1.452.40 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 147991 REVCO SCIENTIFIC $395.33 ELECTRIC PARTS 147992 SAWPA 8300.00 SAWPA WATERSHED COMMITTEE 147993 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $37.98 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 147994 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INrL $112,788.40 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.64B 94 147995 R.CRAIG SCOTT 8 ASSOC. $1,410.28 LEGAL SERVICES-PERSONNEL ISSUES 147996 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $1.231.53 SPECIALTY GASES 147997 SEA COAST DESIGNS $937.20 . OFFICE EQUIPMENT 147998 SERPENTIX CONVEYOR CORP. $2,625.31 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 147999 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $407.07 TOOLS 148000 SHURELUCK SALES $12.730.49 TOOLSARARDWARE 148001 SKILL PATH SEMINARS $118.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION-MANAGEMENT 148002 SKILL PATH,INC. $445.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION.MANAGEMENT 148003 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $710.28 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 148004 SMITH-EMERY CO. $30.00 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-13-94 148005 THE SMITH GROUP $8,239.30 CONSULTING SERVICES 148006 SMITH PIPE B SUPPLY,INC. $90.23 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 148007 SOURCE COM $157.53 TRAINING MATERIALS 148008 SOUTH BAY FOUNDRY,INC. $12,202.59 MANHOLE FRAMES 148009 SO COAST AIR QUALITY 822,408.18 PERMIT FEES 148010 SOUTH COAST WATER $160.00 LAB SUPPLIES 148011 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. $111,987.93 POWER FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1=7/95 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 11/01/95 POSTING DATE 11/01/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR 148012 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $21.697.53 NATURAL GAS 148013 SO CALIF.MARINE INSTITUTE $800.00 OCEAN MONITORING 148014 SPARLING INSTRUMENT CO,INC. $1.283.05 INSTRUMENT PARTS 148015 WESTALLOY,INC. $192.33 WELDING SUPPLIES 148016 SPECIALIZED PRODUCTS CO. $3,740.07 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 148017 SPECTRON&ASSOCIATES $221.75 LAB SERVICES 148018 SUMMIT STEEL $373.38 METAL 148019 SUNSET FORD $116.53 TRUCK PARTS 148020 SUNSET INDUSTRIAL PARTS $189.25 PUMP PARTS 148021 SUPELCO,INC. $85.00 LAB SUPPLIES 14BD22 SUPERB ONE-HOUR PHOTO $55.24 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 148023 SURVEYORS SERVICE CO. $85.90 TOOLS 148024 TCH ASSOCIATES $3,968.63 LAB SUPPLIES 146025 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY 8160.49 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 148026 MIN TEGNER $2.750.00 OCEAN MONITORING CONSULTANT 148027 TELE-CELL,INC. $118.49 TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT 148025 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $13.45 MECHANICAL PARTS 148D29 THORPE INSULATION SB4.07 HARDWARE 148030 TONYS LOCK&SAFE SERVICE $561.09 LOCKS&KEYS 148031 TREBOR ELECTRONICS $652.60 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 148032 TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY,INC. $3,868.00 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.O.611.94 148033 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $1,204.18 TRUCK PARTS 145034 TRUESDAIL LABS $1,641.46 LAB SERVICES 148035 JG TUCKER&SON.INC. $653.88 INSTRUMENT PARTS 148036 TUSTIN DODGE $31.28 TRUCK PARTS 148037 US RENTALS, INC. $540.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 148030 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $290.00 LAB SUPPLIES 145039 ULTRA WHEEL $7.535.21 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 146040 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT $227.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 148041 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $763.53 PARCEL SERVICES 148042 VWR SCIENTIFIC 57,009.23 LAB SUPPLIES 148043 VALIN CORPORATION $125.22. MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 148044 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $302.78 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 148045 VARIAN ASSOCIATES,INC. $1,843.19 LAB SUPPLIES 148046 VENTURA CONSULTING GROUP $3.350.00 WORKSHOP REGISTRATION•TECHNICAL 148047 VILLAGE NURSERIES $138.57 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 14BD48 WACKENHUT CORP. $500.00 CONTRACT SERVICESECURITYGUARDS 148049 CARL WARREN&CO. $630.96 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR 148050 WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION $117.50 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT COURSES 145051 WATERS CORPORATION $76.340.50 LAB EQUIPMENT 148052 K.H.WATTS CO. $545.47 ELECTRIC PARTS ' 148053 WAXIE $60.93 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 148054 WAYNE ELECTRIC $405.94 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS 148055 WEATHER AND WIND INSTRUMENT $475.32 SAFETY SUPPUES 148056 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $23,619.69 CAUSTIC SODA M.O.8.23-95 148057 WEST4JTE SUPPLY CO. $648.48 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1027195 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 11/01/95 POSTING DATE 11/01/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR 140058 JUDITH A.WILSON $99.75 REIMBURSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE 148059 WITEG $905.10 LAB SUPPLIES 148060 WOLFE AND ASSOCIATES,INC. $2.462.00 CONSULTING SERVICES-RFO 148061 ROURKE,WOODRUFF 6 SPRADLIN $69,434.01 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.2-19.92 148062 XEROX CORP. $15.475.35 COPIER LEASES TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 11/01/95 $2,380.708.32 SUMMARY AMOUNT #1 OPER FUND $120.00 #2 OPER FUND $13,586.52 #2 CAP FAC FUND $2,054.00 03 OPER FUND $74,419.92 03 CAP FAC FUND $10.366.75 #5 OPER FUND $7.089.92 #7 OPER FUND $23,656.79 #7 CAP PAC FUND $4,444.00 #11 OPER FUND $949.51 #11 CAP FAG FUND $324.00 #14 OPER FUND $654.43 #14 CAP FAC FUND $372.50 #586 OPER FUND $3,010.68 0586 CAP FAC FUND $3,224.00 9687 OPER FUND $2,596.34 07814 OPER FUND $6,038.16 JT OPER FUND $933,955.66 CORF $1,048,966.91 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $46,644.44 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $198.213.70 $2.380.708.32 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 15, 1995 DISTRICT 7 Agenda Item (9)(a): consideration of Resolution No. 95-116-7, approving Agreement with the Orange County Flood Control District (OCFCD), providing for reimbursement of costs to the OCFCD for Relocation of Gisler-Red Hill Trunk Sewer Siphon under the Santa Ana-Delhi Channel, Contract No. 7-1.2, in conjunction with the OCFCD improvements to the Santa Ana-Delhi Channel within the Cities of Tustin, Irvine, Santa Ana, Costa Mesa, and unincorporated County territory; and authorizing payment of$78,760 for District's portion of said work. Summary A reimbursement agreement with the Orange County Flood Control District (OCFCD) has been prepared to include the relocation of a portion of the Gisler-Red Hill Trunk Sewer into an OCFCD contract. This agreement was originally approved by the Board in August 1992. This section of the channel project was then deleted due to the City of Costa Mesa's plans to add a freeway ramp to the 405 Freeway over the Santa Ana-Delhi Channel. The Orange County bankruptcy has caused Costa Mesa to drop its plans. OCFCD wishes to undertake the widening of the channel at this time, with a modified design, and has requested the agreement be processed again. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the reimbursement agreement with the Orange County Flood Control District. The cost is estimated at $78,750. J:1W PD0CIENGWGRRPTSV 811-04.95 ' COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS i AI ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA October 16, 1995 1p EW6 AVENUE PO.go.912> fOUMAIN VALLEY.LAUMARIA 927M9127 01419624411 STAFF REPORT Approve Reimbursement Agreement with the Orange County Flood Control District Re Relocation of a Portion of the Gisler-Red Hill Trunk Sewer in an Orange County Flood Control District Construction Contract Summary The Gisler-Red Hill Trunk Sewer serves portions of the Cities of Tustin, Irvine, Santa Ana and Costa Mesa,as well as unincorporated County territory. The sewer flows southwesterly from the Lemon Heights area, crosses under the San Diego and Costa Mesa Freeways and parallels the San Diego Freeway to the College Avenue Pump Station in Costa Mesa. When the sewer was first constructed in April 1960,a permit was obtained from the Orange County Flood Control District(OCFCD)for the portion of the sewer crossing the Santa Ana-Delhi Channel right-of-way. In November 1965,OCFCD required County Sanitation District No.7(CSD 7)to construct a sewer siphon for that portion of the sewer. In February 1992, CSD 7 again received a"Prepare to Relocate Notice'from the County of Orange, Environmental Management Agency,to accommodate the construction of concrete box culverts over the Gisler-Red Hill Trunk Sewer at the Santa Ana-Delhi Channel. The sewer relocation was to be completed prior to April 1992,the scheduled bid date for OCFCD's project. The sewer relocation can best be done as part of the OCFCD project. This eliminates contractor scheduling problems,reduces environmental permitting and allows both projects to be constructed under the same dewatering and water control efforts, all saving costs. The Board approved a reimbursement agreement in August 1992 with OCFCD to include the sewer relocation in the OCFCD project, and staff had plans and specifications prepared. Shortly after the approval of the reimbursement agreement,the City of Costa Mesa started plans to add a ramp on the south side of the 405 Freeway. This caused OCFCD to delete 400 feet of their storm drain project,including the sewer relocation. These plans proceeded unfil the Orange County bankruptcy,at which time the City of Costa Mesa could no longer proceed with its plans. OCFCD has now revised the design for the 400-foot section of channel to be an open concrete channel,as a cost savings measure, and now wish to proceed with the bidding and award of that portion. OCFCD has requested the 1992 agreement be processed again,with only the date and agreement number changed. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the reimbursement agreement with the Orange County Flood Control District. The cost is estimated at$78.750. Per the agreement, a$55,000 deposit is due within 60 days of executing the agreement. JCCJac J:MPDOMENG WIGRRPTStSR11-04,95 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS MEETING AGENDA FOR NOVEMBER 15, 1995 Item (12)(a): Minutes of the Executive Committee Summary (1) Receive and file draft Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization Study Committee Minutes for the meetings held on October 19, 1995 and November 2, 1995. (2) Receive and file draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on October 25,1995. (3) Receive and file draft Minutes of Operations,Maintenance,and Technical Services Committee for the meeting held on November 1, 1995. (4) Receive and file draft Minutes of Planning,Design and Construction Committee for the meeting held on November 2, 1995, (5) Receive and file draft Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on November 8, 1995. (6) Receive and file draft Executive Committee Minutes for the meeting held on November 8, 1995. Summary See attached minutes. Executive Committee Recommendation to the Joint Boards of Directors Receive and file minutes listed above. t�wcooc+asuwswovasilwrnt County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California P.O.Box 8127.108"Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92729-8127 Telephone: (714)$62-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF AD HOC COMMITTEE MEETING Thursday October 19 1995, at 5:30 p.m. A meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13, and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Thursday, October 19, 1995, at the Districts' Administrative Office. (1) ROLL CALL Those present were as follows: AD HOC COMMITTEE: STAFF PRESENT: John Collins, PDC Comm. Chair Don McIntyre, General Manager Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Paul Mitchell, Engineering Supervisor (2) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments received. (3) APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the September 13, 1995 Ad Hoc Committee were approved as written. (4) REPORTS OF COMMITTEE CHAIR. GENERAL MANAGER, AND DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING There were no reports. (6) NEW AND MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS None to report. Minutes of Ad Hoc Committee Meeting Page 2 October 19, 1995 (6) OLD BUSINESS (a) Discussion of proposal evaluation and recommendations of consultants for interviews for the Space Utilization Study. The Directors are in general agreement with the staff evaluation and recommendation to proceed with interviews of the three, top-ranked consultants. The interviews will clarify the relative value of the work proposed by the consultants so that a selection can be made and negotiations, if needed, can proceed after the next Ad Hoc Committee Meeting. (7) OTHER BUSINESS, IF ANY No other business was discussed. (6) FUTURE MEETINGS The next meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee will be held on Thursday, November 2, 1995, at Plant No. 2, immediately following the PDC Committee Meeting, to discuss the evaluation of the Warehouse at Plant No. 2 and the recommendations for interim improvements and further evaluations. (9) ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 6:15 p.m. de 4.�q rJ /Gail Cain Committee Secretary DAL:gc JAW PDOCADHOC95W OW 01995.MIN County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California P.O.Box 8127.10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714)962.2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF AD HOC COMMITTEE MEETING Thursday, November 2. 1995, at7715 P.m. A meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13, and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Thursday, November 2, 1995, at the Districts' Operations Center at Plant No. 2. (1) ROLL CALL Those present were as follows: AD HOC COMMITTEE: STAFF PRESENT: John Collins, PDC Comm. Chair Don McIntyre, General Manager John Cox, Joint Chair Blake Anderson, Assistant General Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair Manager David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Paul Mitchell, Engineering Supervisor (2) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments received. (3) APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the October 19, 1995 Ad Hoc Committee were approved as written. (4) REPORTS OF COMMITTEE CHAIR GENERAL MANAGER, AND DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING There were no reports. (5) NEW AND MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS None to report. Minutes of Ad Hoc Committee Meeting Page 2 November2, 1995 (6) OLD BUSINESS (a) Discussion of evaluation of Warehouse at Plant No. 2 and recommendations for interim improvements and further evaluations. An updated and more detailed estimate for the renovation of the Warehouse at Plant No. 2 was presented. The Ad Hoc Committee agreed with the staff recommendation to proceed with the renovation of the existing building for approximately $441,000. (7) OTHER BUSINESS, IF ANY No other business was discussed. (8) FUTURE MEETINGS The next meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee was not scheduled at this time. (9) ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 7:30 p.m. B� /Gail Cain Committee Secretary DAL:gc JAWPDOCADHOC95W OVil IOM.MIN County Sanitation Districts v of Orange County,California P.O.Box 8127 • 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE October 25, 1995-5:30 p.m. A meeting of the Steering Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held Wednesday, October 25, 1995, at 5:30 p.m., at the Districts' Administrative office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: STEERING COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT: ese : Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel John C. Cox, Jr., Joint Chair Peer A. Swan, Vice Joint Chair STAFF PRESENT: George Brown, Chair, FAHR John J. Collins, Chair, PDC Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager Pat McGuigan, Chair, OMTS Blake P. Anderson, Assistant General Manager Judith A. Wilson, Assistant General Manager Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary Absent: Corina Chaudhry, Committee Secretary pro tem Roger Stanton, Vice Chair, FAHR (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. v 5� Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting Page 2 October 25, 1995 (4) APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the September 27, 1995 Steering Committee meeting were approved as drafted. (5) REPORTS OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR. GENERAL MANAGER AND GENERAL COUNSEL (a) There was no report by the Committee Chairman. (b) There was no report by the General Manager. (c) There was no report by Counsel. (6) CONSIDERATION OF TIME LINE FOR STRATEGIC PLAN UPDATE The General Manager said that it has become apparent that there are many decisions that are on hold because staff is unsure of what direction they should be following. The AGMs have spent time putting together a time line and a schedule of the items that are needed to be addressed to move this process forward. Blake Anderson and Nancy Wheatley have both had conversations with EPA, and they seem to be receptive to the Districts initiating reopening of the permit. Given the right spin on our application and our proven track record, it is conceivable that we might be required to provide advanced primary only on our effluent. The existing secondary flow could then go to the OCWD for reclamation. This would make a significant difference on our capital requirements for the next decade. It would also make a difference on the direction of the Districts' Strategic Plan. Blake reported that the issuance of our permit and the development of our Strategic Plan is a case of"chicken and the egg"—which comes first. However, the developments of the past week have provided us with answers. The goal is to get an "umbrella" permit for the next few years. The requirements of the permit will be actual numbers we will be required to meet in our discharge to the ocean. We will try to negotiate the concentration and mass numbers in the permit. Once the numbers are established for the next five years under the new permit . We will be considering the same three scenarios that were used in developing the 1989 Master Plan. Now is the time to re-think this process because of the large reclamation project under consideration. V Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting Page 3 October 25, 1995 The three steps are: • Get the Permit (good for five years). • Develop the Strategic Plan (will be a two year effort). • Tune up the EIR based on the new permit numbers. In year 4 of the permit when reapplication is made, we should then be able to lower the numbers on the permit. Our efforts will be headed towards moving away from the 50/50 secondary but the mass numbers will decrease because of reclamation. The impacts on the ocean should be somewhat less and so will the level of treatment. There was a discussion of possible opponents of the proposed change in treatment level. Early consultation with critics and environmental groups is essential. The state Ocean Plan numbers will have to be met. By not following the 2020 Plan as it is today, there is the possibility of cost avoidance of up to $200 million. Early work includes studies on peak hydraulic discharge management, looking at financing on the short term, and how we use the ocean cutfall (change in operations and repairs). After that the work on the Strategic Plan will begin. Additional studies will be done on demographics and the effects of conservation efforts. The EPA and the Regional Board have both indicated that the operation of the ouffall flapgate for discharging peak storm water is a viable option. The end result will be a modification of the 2020 plan, not a whole new master plan. Changes in timing and sequencing will be addressed. Only those areas that need to be updated will be changed. (7) REVIEW OF THE 1995-96 GOAL STATEMENTS FOR GENERAL MANAGER, ADMINISTRATIVE AND OPERATIONS DEPARTMENTS The Goal Statements were reviewed by the Committee. These will be used for evaluating and measuring the performance of the General Manager, the Assistant General Managers, as well as their subordinates. The General Manager stated that this year the process of approving the Goal Statements and Work Plans and then the budget was reversed and therefore these are "after-the-fact." Next year the Goal Statements and Work Plans will be presented before and will drive the budget process. Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting Page 4 October 25, 1995 The General Manager was directed to revised his Goal Statement to include an item addressing creating change in the corporate culture—accepting change and working as a team, and then submit the package to the Executive Committee for information purposes only. This item will not be added to the overall chart but to the narrative. (8) UPDATE ON CONSOLIDATION EFFORT Judy Wilson presented an update on the Consolidation issue. Additional information has been received from LAFCO in the forth of a draft application that provides guidance. She has also met with a consultant, John Savaguot, on what he sees as the main issues LAFCO will be concerned about. They discussed the three main issues; 1) including the unincorporated areas of the County; 2) future of other smaller sanitary districts in the area; and 3) IRWD as a contracting agency rather than a member of the consolidated districts. Another items discussed were underlying voter approved debt, the issue of COPS, the idea of a cash payment to IRWD if it was a contract agency, and other affects on existing agreements and contracts if consolidation takes place. By January 1996, the financial analysis should be complete and a draft application ready for review. The analysis will be done with and without District 14. Investigation will be done on special districts in case the application is conditioned to include them in the consolidation. Everything should be done by the and of the fourth quarter of this fiscal year. General Counsel indicated that under the Sanitation District Act the Districts are not allowed to own and/or build local sewers but may maintain them. One of the main issues with LAFCO is to avoid overlapping jurisdictions. The General Manager indicated that the State's Constitution Revision Commission is strongly encouraging the revisions to local charters and the need to restructure government. The OC Division of the League of California Cities is also considering the need for restructuring, but no consensus has been reached. (9) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. V Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting Page 5 October 25, 1995 (10) OTHER BUSINESS Blake will be updating the Directors at tonight's Board meeting on the landfill issue. The General Manager will be meeting with the South County's mayors and city managers on the landfill issue on November 2. (11) MATTERS TO BE REPORTED AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were no matters to be reported. (12) MATTERS ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT There were no matters for a future agenda. (13) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next meeting will be at the call of the Joint Chair. (14) ADJOURNMENT The Steering Committee adjourned at approximately 6:55 p.m. Submitted by: an Tappan, Steeri 9 gommittee Secretary M3fM{AM.MIOYAS.NIN 4 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California P.O. Box 8127 a 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Telephone:(714)QU-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF THE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 1. 1996 -6:30 P.M. A meeting of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on November 1, 1995, at 5:30 P.M. at the Districts'Administrative offices. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present as follows: Committee Directors Present: Staff Present: Pat McGuigan, Chair Don McIntyre, General Manager Victor Leipzig, Vice Chair Blake Anderson, Chief Operations Officer John C. Cox, Jr., Joint Chair Judy Wilson, Chief Administrative Officer Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair Ed Hodges, Director of Maintenance Barry Denes Steve Hovey, Director of Information Technology Norman Z. Eckenrode David Ludwin, Director of Engineering James M. Ferryman Bob Dolan, Director of Operations Julie Sa Gary Streed, Director of Finance Sal Sapien Nancy Wheatley, Director of Technical Services Tom Dawes, Planning Engineer Mike Moore, Technical Services Sam Mowbray, Laboratory Manager Mahin Talebi, Source Control Manager Committee Directors Absent: Mark Murphy (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIRMAN PRO TEM, IF NECESSARY No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments from the public. i Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Meeting Page 2 of 4 November 1, 1995 (4) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR, GENERAL MANAGER, ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER OF OPERATIONS, DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS, DIRECTOR OF MAINTENANCE AND DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES (a) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR There was no report by the Committee Chair. (b) REPORT OF GENERAL MANAGER Don McIntyre reported that, to date, only one Director has signed-up to take the tour of Plant No. 2 on November 18. Don also reported that the landfill negotiations have begun with the County. This was followed by a lengthy discussion. (c) REPORT OF ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER OF OPERATIONS Blake Anderson continued Don McIntyre's report on the Landfill negotiations expressing the Districts' seriousness on the subject and pointing out the major concerns. (d) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS There was no report by the Director of Operations. (e) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF MAINTENANCE Ed Hodges reported receiving bids on the removal of the surplus equipment at Plant No. 2. (f) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES Nancy Wheatley introduced Sam Mowbray as the new Environmental Laboratory Manager then reported on the following: 1. CalEPA is working on permit streamlining. 2. The bacteria problems are continuing in Huntington Beach. The Districts are continuing efforts to find the source. There will be a dye test next week. 3. There was a meeting between our technical staff, EPA Region 9 and the Regional Water Quality Control Board on October 19 to discuss the issue of the waiver renewal. It was an excellent meeting. (5) APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF OCTOBER 4, 1995 There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held on October 4, 1995, it was moved, seconded and carried that said minutes be deemed approved as mailed. l Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Meeting Page 3 of 4 November 1, 1995 (6) Consideration for review of Planning. Design and Construction Committee Item PDC95-36: Consideration of motion authorizing staff to solicit proposals for Professional Planning, Design and Construction services for three projects, as follows: Project No. 1: Engineering Services for Investigation and Repair of Ocean Outfalls Project No. 2: Management of Peak Hydraulic Discharge Project No. 3: Determination of Financial Charges Dave Ludwin gave a brief introduction of this Item and of Tom Dawes, Planning Engineer, who proceeded with the presentation. A discussion ensued after which the Directors decided the item was important enough to warrant a vote for the Committee's support. It was moved, seconded and carried to support this item before the PDC Committee. Dave Ludwin will represent the Committee's interest at the PDC meeting of November 2, 1995. (7) OLD BUSINESS OMTS95-11a: Status Report on Excess Capacity Charge Nancy Wheatley gave an update on the Excess Capacity Charge issue. A lengthy discussion ensued. OMTS95-019: Review of Ernst and Young Recommendation for a North County Yard Ed Hodges gave an update of the appraiser's findings of the property located on Harbor Boulevard in Anaheim. He also informed the Committee that staff has begun negotiations with the Orange County Water District and that the process is going well. OMTS95.020: Quarterly Status Report on the implementation of the 38 recommendations made as part of the Ernst and Young Audit of the Operations and Maintenance Departments. Ed Hodges offered to answer questions of the Committee. There was no discussion of this Item. OMTS95.036a: Consideration of a motion authorizing the General Manager to void the present Feasibility Study Agreement with Southern California Edison (SCE) "ENVEST" and enter into a new comprehensive Agreement with the SCE "ENVEST" Program to prepare the present Feasibility Study and to add design and construction portions to SCE funding for the work with the provision that actual execution of the design and construction phases are subject to future authorization by the Districts' Boards of Directors. Bob Ooten gave a brief presentation after which, without discussion, it was moved, seconded and carried to approve staffs recommendation. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Meeting Page 4 of 4 November 1, 1995 (6) NEW BUSINESS OMTS95-046: Consideration of motion approving permit agreement with Serrano Water District and authorizing a one-time excess capacity charge payment of$26,404.49. It was moved, seconded and carried to approve staffs recommendation without discussion. Nancy Wheatley introduced Mahin Talebi, Source Control Manager, who, along with her staff, is responsible for putting together this agreement. The Directors commended and thanked Mahn and her staff for their successful efforts. (9) CLOSED SESSION The Chair declared there were no items for closed session. (10) OTHER BUSINESS, IF ANY None. (11) MATTERS ON WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING None (12) MATTERS A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT None. (13) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING DATES AND ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AT THOSE MEETINGS 1. There are Executive and FAHR Committee meetings next week. 2. This Committee is not meeting in December, however, there is a Board meeting on December 13. The next OMTS Committee meeting is January 3, 1996. 3. Mark your calendars for Saturday, January 27, 1996, the first of the Strategic Plan meetings. (14) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:25 P.M. —` IY tarice M. Marcin Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Secretary T.\GL0BAL\11 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California P.O. Box 8127•10844 Ellis Avenue `1 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714) 962.2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 2. 1995 at 5:00 P.m. A regular meeting of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13, and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Thursday, November 2, 1995. at the Districts' Operations Center at Plant No. 2. Prior to the beginning of the regular meeting, a brief tour of Plant No. 2 was conducted by Bob Ooten, Director of Operations. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was taken and a quorum declared present, as follows: Planning, Design and Construction Committee: Staff Present: Present: Don McIntyre, General Manager Blake Anderson, Assistant General John Collins, Chair Manager John Cox, Joint Chair David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Shirley Dettloff Steve Hovey, Director of Info. Technology Don Griffin Bob Ooten, Director of Operations Margie Rice Nancy Wheatley, Director of Tech. Services Sheldon Singer, Vice Chair John Linder, Construction Manager Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair Tom Dawes, Planning Manager Charles Sylvia Paul Mitchell, Engineering Supervisor Wendy Sevenandt, Associate Engineer Joe Horvath, Construction Project Manger Absent: Others Present: Cecilia Age Mary Lee, John Carollo Engineers Barry Hammond Gail Lynch, John Corolla Engineers Bob Zemel Lee Badertscher, Lee & Ro John Shaw, Counsel Phil Stone, Boyle Engineering Rick Von Langan, CGVL Engineers Minutes of Planning, Design and Construction Committee Meeting Page 2 November 2, 1995 (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments received. (4) APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 7. 1995 MEETING The minutes of the October 5, 1995 Planning, Design and Construction Committee Meeting were approved as written. (5) REPORTS OF COMMITTEE CHAIR, GENERAL MANAGER, ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER, DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING, AND GENERAL COUNSEL (a) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Director Collins reported that the Ad Hoc Committee made a final selection for the Space Utilization Study Consultant, and that it would be covered under the report of the Director of Engineering. (b) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager provided a brief introduction on the update of the Landfill Acquisition. (c) REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER The Assistant General Manager provided details concerning the latest information on the Landfill Acquisition, and provided updated information and the current status of the bankruptcy. He announced there would be an Ad Hoc Committee Meeting re Landfill Acquisition on November 15, 1995, at 4:00 p.m., before the Steering Committee. (d) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING The Director of Engineering provided a status report on the Space Utilization Study. The Ad Hoc Committee selected ColemanlCaskey Architects as the Consultant to perform the study in the amount of$155,550. This item goes directly to the Executive Committee for their recommended approval to the Board. (a) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL No report was given. Minutes of Planning, Design and Construction Committee Meeting Page 3 November 2, 1995 (6) STAFF OVERVIEW OF DISTRICTS' PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES (a) Status Report on Jobs within the Plants and the Districts by the Director of Engineering The Director of Engineering gave a status report on the bid opening of Job No. J-31-2, which is the Ocean Oulfall Booster Station Control System Upgrade. Three bids were received. A protest was received from the second lowest bidder, Soffa Electric,who has since indicated that they will withdraw their protest. A letter documenting the withdrawal of the protest will be solicited from Soffa Electric by Districts'Counsel. Award to Shasta Electric will be presented for approval at the next Board Meeting. (b) Status Report on Emst&Young's Capital Project Management Improvements Process (Nick Arhontes) Nick Arhontes presented the Quarterly Status Report on Ernest & Young's Capital Management Improvements Process. Chair Collins requested another quarterly update. (c) Overview of design of Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2 Paul Mitchell, Engineering Supervisor, provided information concerning the proposed Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2. His information included the floor plan and usage of each area by function. Director Griffin asked if a written specific plan for the design criteria had been accomplished prior to design. Paul indicated there was. There were general questions and answers from the floor concerning the facility. Director Swan asked for the ceiling heights of the second floor areas. This information will be provided to him next week. (d) Status Report on Operations Center at Plant No. 2 The Director of Engineering reported that the Operations Center is essentially complete and our intent is to bring the Closeout to the Board as soon as possible after the first of the year. The bonding company has officially taken over the completion and financial closeout of the project, as the prime contractor. Javid, was financially incapable of completing the project. (e) Status Report on ENVEST Energy Conservation Project Bob Dolan, Director of Operations, presented the status report on ENVEST Energy Conservation Project. He explained that the ENVEST Project is to identify potential projects to save energy. The ENVEST Project is sponsored by Southern California Edison. Edison's consultant is HDR Engineering who is accomplishing the feasibility studies for the ENVEST Project. When the feasibility studies are completed, this information will be brought back to the PDC Committee for further action. Minutes of Planning, Design and D Construction Committee Meeting Page 4 November 2, 1995 (7) OLD BUSINESS None to report. (8) ACTIONS RE PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTS (a) Monthly Change Order Report by Director of Engineering on Change Orders approved by the General Manager, Planning, Design and Construction Committee, and Joint Boards, in accordance with Resolution No. 95-9. John Linder, the Construction Manager, reported on the Monthly Change Order Report. He discussed the three change orders listed on the report. (b) Action items: PDC95-33: Proposed Change Order No. 7 to the Plans and Specifications Electrification of Pump Drives at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36-1; Security and Landscaping Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-1; Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job Nos. P1-38-4; and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43-3. It was moved, seconded, and carried to approve this item. PDC95-34: Consideration of actions re Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-35-3; Process Area Fire Protection, Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job Nos. P1-38-5 and P2-46; and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-55. It was moved, seconded, and carried to approve this item. PDC95-35: Proposed Change Order No. 3 to the Plans and Specifications for Miscellaneous Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-42; and Miscellaneous Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-49. It was moved, seconded, and carried to approve this item. (9) ADDENDA TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS None to report 6" Minutes of Planning, Design and Construction Committee Meeting Page 5 November 2, 1995 (10) NEW PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS PDC95-36: Consideration of motion authorizing staff to solicit proposals for professional planning, design and construction services for three projects: Project No. 1: Investigation and Repair of Ocean Outfalls, Job No. J-39 Project No. 2: Management of Peak Hydraulic Discharge,Job No. J-40-1 Project No. 3: Determination of Financial Charges, Job No. J-40-2 The Director of Engineering introduced Tom Dawes, Planning Manager, who presented information concerning the Strategic Plan,which includes the three projects listed above. The first project will investigate the condition of the Districts'two ocean outfalls and develop means of rehabilitation. The second project will determine our peak hydraulic demand and evaluate ways to both reduce that peak demand and/or delay or eliminate the need for a second deep water ocean outfall. The work will include an inflow- infiltration analysis, and a review of our collection system capacities. The third project will review our current methods for assessing charges for the collection, treatment, and disposal services provided. It was moved, seconded, and carried to recommend approval of this item. (11) CONSIDERATION OF NEW AND MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS None to report. (12) CLOSED SESSION The Chair determined that there was no need for a closed session. (13) OTHER BUSINESS. IF ANY None. (14) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING Director Swan asked that data be presented at the next PDC Committee Meeting regarding the influent Flows to Plant Nos. 1 and 2 under normal dry weather flow and during storm conditions to evaluate the effects of inflow and infiltration. i Minutes of Planning, Design and Construction Committee Meeting Page 6 November 2, 1995 (15) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT There were no matters discussed. (16) NEXT MEETING (a) Executive Committee Meeting- Wednesday, November 8, 1995, at 5:30 p.m. (b) Joint Boards of Directors Meeting-Wednesday, November 15, 1995, at 7:30 p.m. (c) Joint Boards of Directors Meeting-Wednesday, December 13, 1995, at 7:30 p.m. (d) Planning, Design and Construction Committee Meeting -Thursday, January 4, 1995 at 5:30 p.m. (17) OTHER ANNOUNCEMENTS, IF ANY The General Manger advised that the Excess Capacity Charge recently established by the Districts is receiving publicity from both the public and private sector. There seems to be a lot of political interest in Excess Capacity Charge. This will be discussed In future meetings (18) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:15 p.m. yz� y at-� i Gail A. Cain Planning, Design and Construction Committee Secretary in PObpW%ESWONI'0 MIN r 1 I County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California P.O.Box 8127.10844 Ellis Avenue Y Fountain Valley,CA 927288127 Telephone: (714)962.2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE Wednesday, November 8. 1995. 5:30 P.M. A meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on November 8, 1995 at 5:30 p.m., at the Districts' Administrative Offices. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: Committee Directors Present: Staff Present: John C. Cox, Jr., Joint Chair Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager George Brown, Chair Blake P. Anderson, Assistant General Manager Jan Debay Judith A Wilson, Assistant General Manager James Flora Gary Hasenstab, Director of Human Resources Wally Lynn Ed Hodges, Director of Maintenance Thomas Saltarelli Steve Hovey, Director of Information Technology William G. Steiner Bob Ooten, Director of Operations Peer Swan David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Gary Streed, Director of Finance Committee Directors Absent: Nancy Wheatley, Director of Technical Services Michael D. White, Controller Burnie Dunlap Stephen V. Kozak, Financial Manager John M. Gullixson Mike Peterman, Human Resources Supervisor Roger R. Stanton, Vice Chair Others Present: Other Directors Present: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel John Collins Terry Andrus, General Counsel Don Griffin Dennis Vlasich, Keery Consulting Group Pat McGuigan Michael Moreland, Moreland &Associates Charles Acocello, Moreland & Associates Julie Pritchard, Moreland &Associates (2) APPOINTMENT OF A CHAIRMAN PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 2 November 8, 1995 • < P (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS No comments were made. (4) REPORTS OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR. GENERAL MANAGER, ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER(S). DIRECTOR OF FINANCE/TREASURER, DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES. DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND GENERAL COUNSEL (a) Report of the Committee Chair Committee Chair George Brown announced there would be an Executive Committee meeting starting at 7:00 p.m., immediately after this meeting. (b) Report of the General Manager The General Manager, Donald F. McIntyre, reported that the staff recommendation for a consultant to assist with the new Financial Information System (FAHR95-38) had been distributed as advised in the agenda. He also reminded the Directors of the Plant No. 2 tour scheduled for Saturday, November 18. The General Manager and the Director of Technical Services will be meeting with Directors to prepare for "Red Team" meetings regarding excess capacity charges. (c) Report of Assistant General Manager- Operations Blake Anderson reported on the status of the staff and consultant work with the County of Orange regarding the potential purchase of landfills. A more detailed report was scheduled for the Executive Committee meeting later in the evening. A County Board of Supervisors meeting on the topic is scheduled for November 14, the day prior to our next Board meeting. Report of Assistant General Manager-Administration Judy Wilson introduced Mike Peterman whose employment as Personnel Supervisor started this month. (d) Report of the Director of Finance/Treasurer (1) Finance Director/Treasurer Gary Streed updated the Committee on the status of the Districts' COP program which he illustrated by showing a graph of the variable interest rate history on each of the daily rate COPS, and the effective fixed rate for the two refunding issues. The two refunding issues are covered by an interest rate exchange agreement commonly called a "swap." Mr. Streed noted Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 3 November 8, 1995 Y that variable rates historically rise at the end of each quarter, because of business taxes and statements, and usually decline to prior levels immediately in the following month. Staff will continue to keep the Committee fully informed about developments in the program as they occur each month. (2) Mr. Streed noted that October is the first full month of external money management by Pacific Investment Management Company, "PIMCO," the Districts' Investment Manager, and Mellon Trust Company, Custodial Bank. A monthly report prepared by PIMCO and Mellon was handed out at the beginning of the meeting. The Committee reviewed the Monthly Report and the Portfolio Detail By Sector and Portfolio Summary By Sector reports. In conclusion, Mr. Streed advised that the total CSDOC cash and investments amount to $337,832,649 as of October 31, 1995. The Committee moved, seconded and duly carried a motion to receive, approve and forward this report to the Executive Committee and Joint Boards. (e) Report of the Director of Human Resources Gary Hasenstab had no report. (f) Report of the Director of Information Technology The Director of Information Technology, Steve Hovey, reported that the 60 personal computer purchases authorized last month had been completed for a final cost approximately $11,000 less than that authorized. (g) Report of General Counsel General Counsel had no report. (5) APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the draft minutes of the October 11, 1995, meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee. Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 4 November 8, 1995 v (6) Consideration of PDC95-36 -Consideration of motion to solicit Proposals for Professional Planning. Design and Construction services for three proiects as follows: Project No. 1: Engineering Services for Investigation and Repair of Ocean Outfalls Protect No. 2: Management of Peak Hydraulic Discharge Protect No. 3: Determination of Financial Charges Dave Ludwin, Director of Engineering, and Tom Dawes of his staff gave a brief presentation detailing three separate, but related projects which staff is requesting authorization to solicit RFPs. Most of the proposed work is Master- Plan related, and the land use data necessary for the Management of Peak Hydraulic Discharge and Determination of Financial Charges is nearly identical. Several different Professional Services Agreements will be required to complete the projects. After discussion on this item, it was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend the Executive Committee authorize staff to request proposals on the three projects as noted above. (7) OLD BUSINESS FAHR95-24 Consideration of motion extending early retirement incentive program provisions for all eligible employees: (a) Consideration of motion to recommend a Board Ordinance adopting the provisions of Government Code Section 31641.04 authorizing all eligible Districts' employees to receive two years additional service credit for retirement Purposes. (b) Consideration that the Ordinance should specify that Provisions of the Early Retirement Incentive Program would be effective January 1 through March 30, 1996, and that the total cost-savings of positions filled at a lower level or held vacant for a period of time shall exceed the total actuarial cost of the additional service credit granted and associated paid leave payoff costs. Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 5 November 8, 1995 1 (c) Consideration that, for a period of five years, or until such time as the full actuarially determined cost is paid to OCERS. the Districts' Controller will conduct an annual post-audit to verify that the savings exceed the actuarial and associated costs attributable to the additional service credit, and report the findings of that audit to the Finance. Administration and Human Resources Committee. The first report will be presented during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 1996. Gary Hasenstab reported that the cost of the 1995 program has already been exceeded by avoided payroll costs for the first four months, and that the program has been very successful. After discussion on this matter, it was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval of the extension of the early retirement incentive program, as indicated above, to the Executive Committee. FAHR95-38 Consideration of motion authorizing selection of a consultant and a professional services agreement for a New Financial Information System. Phase III, Selection Process for Hardware and Software: and Phase IV. Implementation and Acceptance of the Selected Hardware and Software Solutions. Mike White, Controller, advised that the firm of Deloitte &Touche has been selected to complete Phases I and II for the selection, acquisition and installation of a new financial information system within the Districts' Finance Department. In October 1995, the FAHR Committee approved the F.I.S. Request for Proposals and authorized staff to solicit proposals for professional consulting services to complete the project. Mr. White reported that four(4) proposals were received on Friday, October 28, 1995, from Ernst &Young LLP, A.E.F. Consulting Systems, Intelligent Directions Consulting, and Kerry Consulting Group. Interviews were conducted on November 2 and 3, 1995. After interviewing and evaluating each of these consulting firms, Kerry Consulting Group was found to offer the best services consistent with the requirements of the project, and their bid was found to be within the amount budgeted for the project. Mr. Dennis Vlasich was introduced and he described his experience, knowledge and approach to projects of this type. Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 6 November 8, 1995 i After discussion on this matter, it was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve staffs recommendation to enter into a professional services agreement with Kerry Consulting Group for a New Financial Information System, Phase II, Selection Process for Hardware and Software; and Phase IV, Implementation and Acceptance of the Selected Hardware and Software Solutions; for a sum not to exceed $58,263. 8. NEW BUSINESS FAHR95 44 Consideration of Resolution No. 95- . Revising Districts' Procedure for Settlement of Claims Made Against the Districts: Settlement of Claims Made by the Districts: Collection of Delinquent Accounts Owing to the Districts: Settlement of Civil or Administrative Actions: and Settlement of Worker's Compensation Actions: and repealing Resolution Nos. 93-13 and 90-89. Gary Streed reported that the Directors approved Resolutions in 1990 and 1993 which established staffs authority to settle different types of claims by and against the Districts. The purposes of this proposed Resolution are to combine the existing authorities into one Resolution and to revise the dollar thresholds of the authority levels. The authority levels proposed will parallel those recently approved for purchases and other authority delegations in Resolution No. 95-62. Mr. Streed summarized the proposed changes to be included in the proposed resolution. After discussion on this item, it was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend the Executive Committee approve a resolution amending claim settlement procedures, and to direct staff to report annually on settlement activities and results. FAHR95-45 Consideration of motion to review, approve and file Joint Works Budget Reviews prepared by staff for the quarter ended September 30, 1995. Gary G. Streed presented the Joint Works Budget reviews for the quarter ended September 30, 1995. He reviewed the summary statements of the Joint Works Operating Costs, the Joint Works Capital Improvement Program, and the costs of the workers' compensation, public liability and health plan self-insurance funds for the three months of fiscal year 1995-96, as well as some comparative graphics. After discussion on this item, it was moved, seconded and duly carried to review, approve and file these reports. Staff will report in January on labor charges outside of the Treatment Plants. Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 7 November 8, 1995 a Summary reports for the Joint Works and the individual Districts will be considered by the full Boards of Directors at their next meeting. FAHR95-46 Consideration of motion to receive, approve and He the Annual Audit Report submitted by Moreland & Associates, Certified Public Accountants, and staff: the annual Management Letter. the Auditor's Report to the Finance. Administration and Human Resources Committee, and the Appropriations Limit Report: and forward the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report to the Executive Committee. Mike White announced that the Districts' independent auditors, Moreland & Associates, have completed their examination for 1994-95. Each year, the FAHR Committee reviews the results of the audit and the corresponding management letter. He advised that this year, the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) has been completely prepared in-house, for the first time. The CAFR will be submitted to the Government Finance Officers' Association (GFOA) for their review. Michael Moreland, Partner and Charles Acocello, Senior Manager, and Julie Pritchard, were in attendance and answered some of the Directors' questions regarding the audit and the CAFR. After some discussion, it was moved, seconded and duly carried to receive and approve the: Annual Audit Report submitted by Moreland &Associates, Certified Public Accountants, and staff; the annual Management Letter, the Auditor's Report to the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee; and the Appropriations Limit Report; and forward the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report with an editorially revised transmittal letter to the Joint Boards. (9) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session required. (10) OTHER BUSINESS. IF ANY None. (11) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING No reports were requested. (12) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT None. Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page S November 6, 1995 (13) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING DATES AND ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AT THOSE MEETINGS The next Committee meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, January 10, 1996. (14) ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 7:00 p.m. GGS Ic JMPDOCTI N�CRANETPC.M7GTAHR.9bVAHR.MINWFAHR11.95 Formal O i et n Wrtnen Raport Q Overheads De n!Head Stan Q Slides 0 Flip Charts Anticiveted Time li min. FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE AGENDAFOR NOVEMBER 8, 1995 (4)(d)(2) Treasurer's Report Summary As previously reported, both PIMCO and Mellon signed their final contracts in time for the U.S. Treasury Bill maturity of September 7. October will be the first full month of external money management. Monthly reports are available from PIMCO and Mellon on the sixth day after calendar month- end. Thus, they are not available for the regular FAHR Committee mailing, but will be distributed at the meeting. Attached are a three-page Portfolio QgW by Sector report and a one-page Portfolio Summary by Sector report which we hope to obtain on-line from Mellon Trust in the near future. These reports include a description of our investments, our current market value, the percentage that would be realized if fixed income securities were sold, the estimated annual income from fixed securities, and the current yield for fixed securities. The annualized gain/loss, the estimated annual yield, and the current yield are not reported for cash and cash equivalent investments, which are purchased at a discount with the interest imbedded in the maturity value. Balances CSDOC October 31,1995 State of Calif.LAIF $12,943,353 Bank of Amenca 1,269,187 PIMCO-Short-term Portfolio 60,520,792 PIMCO-Long-term Portfolio 236,765.148 District 11 GO Bond Fund 10,013 Debt Service Reserves @ Trustees 26.324.15E $337,832,649 Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the Committee receive this report and the supplemental information which will be available at the meeting, approve and forward the reports to the Executive Committee and the Joint Boards. J\NTpOCYWAUNDFFC.MiCSN1R BW IENieFlS11.Y5 MONTHLY REPORT COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY RMSTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ending October 31, 1995) Liquid Operating Monies 14.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value: $60,520,421 Historical Cost: $60,531,l95 14.1.2 MOD4'IED DURATION Of Portfolio: .15 Of Index: .25 14.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact (gain/loss) of I% Change: $90,781 14.1.4 REVERSE REPOS % of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: (see attached schedule) 0% 14.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY % of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 68% 14.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: AA 14.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING % of Portfolio Below "A": 0 14.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" 14.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Portfolio Total Rate of Return: 1 Month: .46 3 Months: ---- 12 Months: ---- Year-to-Date: --- Index Total Rate of Return: I Month: .42 r. w rymourloaro _ I1 MONTHLY REPORT COUNTY SANITATION D19TRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY INVESTMENT MANAGEMENTPROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING ((or the month ending October 31, 1995) Long Term Operating Monies 14.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value: $236,571,005 Historical Cost: $235,423,026 14.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 2.27 Oflndex: 2.4 14.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact (gain/loss) of 1% Change: $5,370,162 14.1.4 REVERSE REPOS % of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: (see attached schedule) 0% 14.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY % of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: NA 14.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: AA 14.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING % of Portfolio Below "A": 0 14.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" 14.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Portfolio Total Rate of Return: 1 Month: .98 3 Months: ---- 12 Months: --- Year-to-Date:Index Total Total Rate of Return: I Month: .98 r: 4ry m. f November 8, 1995 CSDOC TOTAL CASH & INVESTMENTS ,.m �»m Sim .77>o DnG Oe[3% J .'31 qEM Mir 31 ApW Mry31 J...W J*'31 Ap 31 SM311 0. W JM�IMCRANEI WGT.3RRBSViE1AMR Sl1M OCS0000300 MILIDN TRUST PACE: 1 OR CITY COMBOL PORTFOLIO SUMMARY BY SECTOR BASE: USD SrT£TZ495 Halloo 1 or UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CURR PORTFOLIO DISTRIOU71ON COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOB6 ANNUAL INCOME YIELD ______________________________ __________________ __________________ ------ ----------------- ---------------- ---__.- CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS CASH 1.30 1.30 0.001 0.00 0.00 O.00 BANKERS' ACCEPTANCES 2,935,026.67 2,935,016.67 0.99% 0.00 0.0C 0.00 COHMERCIAL PAPER - D13COVNT SS,194,531.00 65,194,331.00 19.571 0.00 0.00 0.00 U.9.AGENCIES - LESS THN 1TR 3,055,075.83 3,055,075.03 1.03% 0.00 C.00 0.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE -LE 9,201,362.45 9,191,312.43 3.091 0.00 0.00 0.00 FNMA ISSUES - LESS THN IYR 11,895,840.00 11,095,84C.00 41001 0.00 0.00 C.00 FED HN LOAN SHE - LESS THN IYR 11,827.330.00 11,027,330.00 3.98E 0l00 0.00 0.00 SSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNTS 306,733,00 306,755.00 0.201 0.00 12,270.20 4,09 - _____ __________________ ------ __ ________________ ---------------- ------- TOTAL CASH 4 CASH EQUIVALENTS 94,/05,932.33 94,405,032.33 31.761 0.00 12,270.20 0.01 rIKEO INCCME SECURITIES U.S. GOVERNMENTS 100.499,218.75 101,470,730.00 34.331 971,511.25 6,911,250.00 6.81 U.S. AGENCIES 52,720,913.20 53,002,739.70 27,661 361,025.42 3,582,794.00 6.75 BANKING 6 FINANCE 31,464,010.62 31,521,014.85 10.60% $6,204.24 2,208,167.00 7.01 INDUSTRIAL 11,507,100.00 11,560,140.00 3.991 53,040.00 998,500.00 8.55 OTHER CORPORATE SONDE 21554,030.00 21343,675.90 0.851 -10,373.00 113,750.00 8.40 __________________ ----------------- ________ ----------------- ---------------- ------- TOTAL FINED INCOME SECURITIES 198,746,092.64 200,170,290.55 67,34% 1,432.205.91 13,904,451.00 4.95 OTHER PORTFOLIO MSE73 PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 2,701,709.82 2,701,709.82 0.91% 0.00 0.00 0.00 __________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ _______ TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO A99ETS 2,701,709.02 2,701,709.02 0.911 0.00 0.00 0.00 NET PORTFOLIO A35CT3 295r 85],771.79 297.285,910.70 300.001 1.132r205.91 13.916,721.30 1.68 OCS0000300 MELLON TRUST PAGE: 1 OR CITY CONSOL PORTFOLIO OESAIL BY SECTOR 9E: U90 31- C 5-1995 Mae;HB1300 MAAKET 4 OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CUM SNARES/PAR SECURITY DESCRIPTION PRICE MARKET VALUE TOTAL COOT GAINAOSS ANNUAL INCOME YLD --------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CASH L CASH EQUIVALENTS CASH 0 CASH 1.000 1.30 0.00 1.30 0,00 0.00 0.03 -----------------------•__-`_____-__-•----_----_---------------_------------- SUBTOTAL CASK 1.30 0.00 1.39 0.00 0.00 0,00 BANKERS' ACCEPTANCES 3,000,000 REPUBLIC NEW YORK B/A DISC 97.034 2,935,015.67 0.99 2,935,016.67 0.00 0.00 0.30 02/91/1996 ------ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBTOTAL BANKERS' ACCEPTANCE$ 2,933,016.47 0.99 2,935,016.57 0.00 O.CO 0.00 COMRCIAL PAPER - DISCOUNT 11,800,000 AMERICAN TEL 4 TL DISC 09.300 11,726,079.34 3.94 11,726,079.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 11/03/1995 _ 3,000,000 ASSOCIATE$ CP NA DISC 90.627 2,950,920.00 1.00 2,956,920.00 0,00 0.00 C.00 12/04/1995 11,300,000 ASSOCIATES CP MR DISC 90.596 11,334,514.44 3.91 11,339,514,44 0.00 0.00 9.09 12/061199S 300,000 KM INTL FIN INC DISC 00,353 295,060.00 0.10 295,060.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 01/17/1996 5,300,600 NEW 8. WALES TREY DISC 99.008 3,449,046.11 1,83 51449,046.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 11/30/1995 400.000 NEW 9. MALLS TROY DISC 99.477 397,906.33 0,13 391,905.33 C.00 0.00 0.00 11/13/1995 3,900,090 NEW S. WALES TA9Y DISC 99.066 21971,975.00 1.00 21971,975.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 12/11/1905 14,000,000 ONTARIO KYDRO DISC 08.569 13,799,690.09 4.64 13,199,698.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 12/08/1903 400,000 QUEEMBLAND TREAS DISC 99.600 394,432.54 0.13 394,432.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 12/12/1995 3,000,000 TREASURY CP VICT DISC 99.096 2,972,877.30 1.00 2,972,977.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 11/30/1995 2,900,000 U S "EST COBMUN DISC 99.604 2,908,520.83 0.97 2,809,520.83 0.00 O.CO 0.00 11/14/1995 _________________________________________________________________________ SUBTOTAL COMMERCIAL PAPER - DISCOUNT 35,194,531.00 10.57 55,194,531.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 U.S.AGENCIES - LEGS THN IYR 3,100,060 FNLMC DISC NT 90.551 3,055,075.03 1.03 3,055,075.03 0.00 O,OO 0.00 MAT 01/22/1996 ------------------------------•-------•_--•-•-----•-----•-_---•_----•---•--_- SUBTOTAL U.S.AGENCIES - LESS INN IYR 3,035,075.03 1.03 3,035,075.83 0.00 0.00 0.0O FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE -LESS THAN 1 YR 1,300,000 FED HOME LN HTG CORP DISC NTS 99.593 1,294,704.07 0.44 2,294,704.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 MAT 11/20/1995 0,000,000 FEDERAL RME LN MTG CORP DISC 90.700 7,096,677.78 2.66 7,996,677.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 MAT 12/15/1995 _ acsc00Dloa MELLON TRUST PAGEi 2 on CITY CONSOL PORTFOLIO DETAIL BY SECTOR BASE: USD 31-OCT-2995 HSlloo MARKET 1 OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CURB SHARES/PAR SECURITY DESCRIPTION PRICE MARKET VALUE TOTAL COST CAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YLD --------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBTOTAL FEDERAL HOME LOIN MORTGAGE 9,291,302.44 3.09 9,191,382.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 FNMA ISSUES - LESS INN IYR 12,000,000 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DISC HIS 90.132 11,993,940.00 4.00 11,005,040.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MAT 11/03/1995 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBTOTAL FNMA ISSUES LESS INN IYR 11,095,040.00 4.00 11,895,940.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 FED HM LOAN BNK - LESS INN IYR 12,000,000 FED HOME LN SK CONS DISC NIS 96,561 11,921,330.00 3.90 11,021,330.00 0.00 C.00 0.00 MAT 01/24/1999 SUBTOTAL FED IM LOAN BNK - LESS TNN 11,827,330.00 3.98 11,827.330.00 0.00 O.CO 0.00 BODY RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNTS 306,755 BSOT RESEA4T DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 100.000 306,755.00 0.10 306,755.00 0.00 12,270.20 4.00 PUBLIC II __••___•-•-•----------------------------------------------------------------- SURT07AL SSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUN 306,756.00 0.10 306,75S.00 0.00 12,270.20 4.00 ----- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL CASH 4 CASH EOUIVALZNTB 94,405,932.33 31.76 94,405,932.33 0.00 12,270.20 0.01 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S. GOV66HMENTS 97,000,000 U 9 TREASURY NOTES 104.609 '01,470,730.00 34.13 100,499,219.75 971,511.25 6,911,250.00 6.01 07.1251 09/30/1999 00 09/30/94 ---- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SUBTOTAL U.S. GOVERNMENTS 101,470,739.00 34.13 200,499,210.75 971,511.25 6,911,250.00 6.91 U.S. AGENCIES 2,355,000 FEDERAL NINE IN MTC CORP DEB 100.524 21390,980.70 0.90 2,369,350,79 -162.00 190,204.00 0.03 8.0801 02/09/1999 25,000,000 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG DEB 101.103 25,276,250.aO 8.50 25,000,000.00 276,250.00 1,690,000.00 6.65 6,720% 10/02/2000 DO 10/02/95 2$,000,000 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DEB 101.750 25,437,500.00 9.56 25.351,562.50 95,937.50 1,712.500.00 6.73 6,Wl 05/26/2000 DO 05/26/95 ----- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBTOTAL U.S. AGENCIE! 53,002,730.70 17.04 52,720,913,20 361,925.42 3,592,784.01 6.73 BANKING i FINANCE 1,300,000 CHRYSLER FINL MTN TR 3 002al 102,320 1,534,920.00 O.S2 1,534,950.00 -30.00 122,400.00 7.97 9.1401 01/31/1997 DO 01/11/95 465,000 CHRYSLER FI111: MTN TR 4 00224 102.329 475,703,35 0.26 475,972.61 -109.26 37,572.00 7.90 9.0301 01/31/1997 DO 61/31/93 1,500,000 CHRYSLER ?THL MTN TR 4 00258 101.634 1,524,510.00 0.51 1,522,140.00 2,310.00 110,700.00 7.25 1.360% 03/17/1997 DO 03/03/95 2,900,000 CHRYSLER FINL MTN TR 4 00306 102.240 2,965,192.00 1.00 2,952,996.00 12,296.00 210,030.00 1.11 7,270% 04/23/1909 DO 04/13/95 OC9D000100 MELLON TRUST PAGE, 3 OR CITY CONSOL PORTFOLIO DETAIL BY SECTOR BASE, u9O 31-OCT-1995 HBI100 MARKET 9 OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CURR SHARES/PAR SECURITY DESCRIPTION PRICE MARKET VALUE TOTAL COST GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YLO --------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------.-------------------------.---------------------- 1,000,000 CNRYSLER FIK: MTN TR / 00335 99,901 999,010.00 0.34 993,160.00 3,910.00 62,600.00 6.27 6.260% 01/20/1998 DD 07/29/98 7,100,000 FORD MOTOR CR MTN TR 100377 90.763 7,022,173.00 2.36 6,999,740.09 1,425.00 347,190.00 4.P5 VAR/RT 03/30/1999 OD 03/30/94 4,000,000 FORD MTR CR MTN TRANCHE ITR 96 99.363 3,974.520.00 1.34 3,970,400.00 4,040.00 2371600.00 5.90 FT.TG/RT 11/09/1900 DO 11/00/93 3,000,000 G M A C NED TERM HIS 100,217 3,246,510.00 1.09 3,227,070.00 19,440.00 250,750.00 1.91 9.6259 1/10/2000 DO 1/10/95 3.7CO,000 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP 14TN TR00324 106,142 3,927,2$4.00 1.32 3,911,640.00 15,614,00 309,075.00 7.89 0.375% 0210V 1999 DD 0/03/95 1,750,000 MOMS SVGS AMER CALIF FA NY 101.535 1,776,662.50 0.60 1,786,974.00 -1C,1L' .SG 183,750.03 1C.34 30.300% 06/12/1997 I,000,000 LEF9M BROS 7NC SR SUB NT9 100.709 1,007,090.00 0.34 .1007,520.00 370.00 70,000.00 6.9$ 7.000% 5/15/1297 DO 5/27/94 2,000,000 SEARS DC CORP MTN SEX 1; 102.520 2,050,400.00 0.99 2,050,400.00 0.00 180,000.00 2.79 9.006% 08/01/1996 OD 09/01/91 1,000,000 SEARS ROEBUCK MTN / TR 00491 102.593 1,025,930.00 0.35 1,031,060.00 -5,930.00 76,900.00 1.50 7.690% 02/27/1990 DO 02/29/95 ----- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBTOTAL BANKING 6 FINANCE 31,521,014.05 10.60 31,464,010.61 56,2C4.24 21200,167.00 1.01 INDUSTRIAL 1,500,000 CNRYSLER CORP DEB 106.674 1,600,110.00 0.54 1,603,320.00 -3,210.00 156,000.30 9.75 10.4004 09/01/1999 9,GCO,000 PHILIP MORRIB C09 NT 110.667 9.96C,030.00 3.35 9,903,19C.00 56,250.00 832,500,00 9.36 9.250% 02/15/2000 --------_-------------------_________________________________________________ SUBTOTAL INDUSTRIAL 11,560,14C.00 3.09 11,507,100.00 $3,040.00 990,500.00 8.55 OTHER CORPORATE BONDS 2,S00,000 SEARS ROEBUCK 4 CO HT 101.747 2,543,675.00 0.86 2,564,050.00 -10,375.00 213,750.00 9.40 9.5501 98/02/1996 ------------ ---------------------------------------------------------------- SUBTOTAL OTHER CORPORATE BDN09 2,543,675.00 0.06 2,5S4,050.00 -10,375.00 213,750.30 6.40 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 200,178,298.55 67.34 19B,746,092.64 1,432,205.91 13,904,451.00 6.95 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 0 INTEREST RECEIVABLE 1.000 2,701,709.02 0.91 2,701,709.02 0,00 0.00 0.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBTOTAL PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 2,701,709.92 0.91 2,701,709.02 0.03 0.00 0.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 2,701,709.82 0.91 2,702,709.92 0.00 D.00 C.00 NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 297.295,940.70 100.00 T95,BS3,73d.79 1,d32,205.91 73,916,T21.20 /.69 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California P.O.Box 8127 • 109"Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 1995 AT 7 P.M. A meeting of the Executive committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Wednesday, November 8, 1995 at 7 p.m., at the Districts'Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT: Present: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Terry Andrus, Counsel John Cox, Jr.,Joint Chair Charles Acocello, Moreland & Associates Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair Pat McGuigan, Chair, District 1 and OMTS Chair STAFF PRESENT: John J. Collins, Chair, District 2 and PDC Chair Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager George Brown, FAHR Chair Blake P. Anderson, Asst. Gen]. Mgr. Sal A. Sapien, Chair, District 3 Judith A. Wilson, Asst. Gent. Mgr. Jan Debay, Chair, District 5 Gary Hasenstab, Director of Human Resources Barry Hammond, Chair, District 7 Edwin Hodges, Director of Maintenance Victor Leipzig, Chair, District 11 Steve Hovey, Director of Information Technology Thomas Saltarelli, Chair, District 14 David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Roger Stanton, County Supervisor Robert Ooten, Director of Operations William Steiner, County Supervisor Nancy Wheatley, Director of Technical Services Mike White, Controller Mike Peterman, Human Resources Supervisor Absent: Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary James Ferryman, Chair, District 6 John Gullixson, Chair, District 13 Don R. Griffin, Past Joint Chair (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. �P Minutes of the Executive Committee a Page 2 November 8, 1995 (4) APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the October 18, 1995, Executive Committee meeting were approved as drafted. (5) REPORTS OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR, GENERAL MANAGER, AND GENERAL COUNSEL (a) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR There will be an meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee re Landfill Issues on Wednesday, November 15 at 4 p.m., before the Steering Committee. A letter has been sent to the South County cities asking for representation on the Ad Hoc Committee. They have indicated an interest in our efforts. The discussion on the Solid Waste Management System was continued from the FAHR Committee. Judy Wilson indicated that there is a meeting scheduled next week with the Executive Director of LAFCO to begin the process. It appears that the most practical way to proceed at this time is to form two new districts—one for solid waste and the other a consolidated district formed from the nine existing Sanitation Districts to handle only wastewater, and then prepare agreements with both districts for a joint management team. (b) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager asked that a supplemental item (FAHR95-24) be added to the agenda. It was addressed by the FAHR Committee but did not appear on the Executive Committee agenda. The motion was made, seconded and carried unanimously. (c) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel indicated that he will be suggesting at next Wednesday night's Joint Board meeting that staff begin preliminary work and begin processing resolutions. (6) (a) It was moved, seconded and passed that the minutes of the October 19, 1995 Ad Hoc Committee Meeting re Space Utilization Study be received and filed. (b) It was moved, seconded and passed that the Executive Committee concur in the recommended actions relative to professional consulting services agreement for preparation of Space Utilization Study (Job No. J-38-1), as follows: Minutes of the Executive Committee Page 3 November 8, 1995 (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization Study certification of the final negotiated fee with Coleman/Caskey Architects for said services. (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 95-_, approving the Professional Consulting Services Agreement with Coleman/Caskey Architects for said services on an hourly rate basis for labor plus overhead, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $155.550.00. (c) (1) It was moved, seconded and passed to receive and file draft Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee Meeting Re Space Utilization held November 2, 1995. (2) It was moved, seconded and passed to concur in the recommended actions of the Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization held November 2, 1995, as follows: (a) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to proceed with Renovations to Existing Warehouse at Plant 2, Job No. P2-23-6-R2, in an amount not to exceed$441,000. (7) It was moved, seconded and passed to receive and file draft Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting held October 25, 1995. (8) (a) It was moved, seconded and passed to receive and file draft Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Meeting held November 1, 1995. (b) It was moved, seconded and passed to concur in the recommended actions of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Meeting held November 1, 1995, as follows: OMTS95-036a: Consideration of a motion authorizing the General Manager to void the present Feasibility Study Agreement with Southern California Edison (SCE)'ENVEST' and enter into a new comprehensive Agreement with the SCE"ENVEST'Program to prepare the present Feasibility Study and to add design and construction portions to SCE funding for the work with the provision that actual execution of the design and construction phases are subject to future authorization by the Districts' Boards of Directors. OMTS95-046: Consideration of motion recommending approval of Permit Agreement between Serrano Water District and County Sanitation District No. 2, authorizing a one-time excess capacity charge payment of$26,404.49. Minutes of the Executive Committee Page 4 November 8, 1995 (9) (a) It was moved, seconded and passed to receive and file draft Minutes of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee Meeting held November 2, 1995. (b) It was moved, seconded and passed to concur in the recommended actions of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee Meeting held November 2, 1995, as follows: PDC95-34: Consideration of Resolution No. 95-_, approving plans and specifications for Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-35.3; Process Area Fire Protection, Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job Nos. P1-38-5 and P246; and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-55, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids (Tentative bid date is January 9, 1996). POC95-36: Consideration of motion authorizing staff to solicit proposals for professional services agreements for planning, design and construction services for projects, as follows: (a) Investigation and Repair of Ocean Outfalls, Job No. J-39 (b) Management of Peak Hydraulic Discharge, Job No. J-40-1 (c) Determination of Financial Charges and Fee Structures, Job No. J-00-2 (10) (a) Because of the compressed meeting schedule this month, the draft Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting held November 8, 1995 were not available. They will be presented to the Executive Committee at its next meeting. However, a verbal report by the FAHR Committee Chair, Pat McGuigan, indicated that the FAHR Committee did take the actions noted in (10)(b). (b) It was moved, seconded and passed to concur in the recommended actions of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting held Novembers, 1995, as follows: (The following item was added to the agenda by unanimous vote of the Executive Committee.) FAHR95-24 Consideration of motion extending early retirement incentive program provisions for all eligible employees: (a) Consideration of motion to recommend a Board Ordinance adopting the provisions of Government Code Section 31641.04 authorizing all eligible Districts' employees to receive two years additional service credit for retirement purposes. Minutes of the Executive Committee Page 5 November 8, 1995 (b) Consideration that the Ordinance should specify that provisions of the Early Retirement Incentive Program would be effective January 1 through March 30, 1996, and that the total cost-savings of positions filled at a lower level or held vacant for a period of time shall exceed the total actuarial cost of the additional service credit granted and associated paid leave payoff costs. (c) Consideration that, for a period of five years, or until such time as the full actuarially determined cost is paid to OCERS, the Districts' Controller will conduct an annual post-audit to verify that the savings exceed the actuarial and associated costs attributable to the additional service credit, and report the findings of that audit to the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee. The first report will be presented during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 1996. FAHR95.38 Consideration of Resolution No. 95-_, approving Professional Services Agreement with Kerry Consulting Group for preparation of New Financial Information System Phase III, Selection Process for Hardware and Software; and Phase IV, Implementation and Acceptance of the Selected Hardware and Software Solutions (Specification No. P-167), on an hourly- rate basis including labor, overhead, direct expenses and profit, plus out- of-pocket costs, for an amount not to exceed $58,263.00. FAHR95-44 Consideration of Resolution No. 95-_, Revising Districts' Procedure for Settlement of Claims Made Against the Districts; Settlement of Claims Made by the Districts; Collection of Delinquent Accounts Owing to the Districts; Settlement of Civil or Administrative Actions; and Settlement of Worker's Compensation Actions; and repealing Resolution Nos. 93-13 and 90-89. FAHR95-45 Consideration of motion to review, approve and file Joint Works Budget Reviews prepared by staff for the quarter ended September 30, 1995. (This is an information only item. Does not need to be considered by the Joint Boards.) FAHR95.46 Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) for the year ending June 30, 1995, subject to the CAFR being revised by staff before being submitted to the Joint Boards on November 15. (11) Consideration of the following actions by the Executive Committee: (a) PF C95-13 It was moved, seconded and passed (7 ayes, 5 nays) to recommend approval of the following actions re Deferred Compensation Plan - Accounting for Participants' Contributions: Minutes of the Executive Committee Page 6 November 8, 1995 a) Authorize the Finance Director to deposit$935,336 with Lincoln National Insurance Plan from the Joint Contingency Reserve Fund. b) Do not provide an "interest earnings" adjustment. o) Authorize the Finance Director to transfer and credit the entire value of the receivable due from the County of Orange, pursuant to the Bankruptcy settlement, the Districts'CORF and General Operating Contingency Reserve Fund and to remove the value of any such receivable from all funds other than the Reserve Funds d) Authorize the Finance Director to restore all funds except the Contingency Reserve Funds to their respective pre-bankruptcy position balances (12/5/94). e) Upon receipt of proceeds from the Bankruptcy Settlement Agreements, authorize the Finance Director to deposit these proceeds to the respective CORF and General Operating Budgets Contingency Reserve Funds. (b) EXEC95-04 It was moved, seconded and passed (with Director Debay abstaining)to recommend approving Amendment No. 2 to"Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Capacity Rights in Treatment, Disposal and Sewer Facilities" between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13 and County Sanitation District No. 14. (c) EXEC95-05 Status report on negotiations with SAWPA re new Capacity Purchase Agreement. This agreement has been agreed to in principal. The agreement will be presented to SAWPA's Board and will then go through the Districts' Committee process in January. (12) CLOSED SESSION There was no need for a Closed Session. (13) OTHER BUSINESS The General Manager gave a "heads up"on the status of the excess capacity charge. There have been many letters changing hands in the past few months, and next week there will be two meetings (Nov. 13 and Nov. 17)to discuss this issue. Staff is holding a briefing tomorrow at 9:30 on this issue and any Director who is planning to attend either of these meetings is encouraged to attend. Director Debay asked staff if she could receive testing results for the area around the mouth of the Santa Ana River. The Director of Technical Services will supply them. Director Debay was also advised that we have staff available to talk with groups about our treatment process and monitoring program. Minutes of the Executive Committee Page 7 November 8, 1995 (14) MATTERS TO BE REPORTED ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. (15) MATTERS ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT. There were none. (16) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Executive Committee meeting is scheduled for January 17, 1996. (17) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 8:30 p.m. Submitted by n Tappan, Secrets MEJ£mNpVpA11M05.IaN JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING AGENDA FOR NOVEMBER 15, 1995 Agenda Item (12)(b)(1): Consideration of the following actions relative to the Professional Services Agreement with Coleman/Caskey Architects, Inc. for preparation of Space Utilization Study, Job No. J-38-1: (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization Study certification of the final negotiated fee with Coleman/Caskey Architects, Inc. for said services. (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 95.109, approving said agreement with Coleman/Caskey Architects, Inc. for said services, on an hourly rate basis for labor plus overhead, subconsultant fees, and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $155,550. u ma In May 1989, the Directors approved an agreement with Brown and Caldwell Engineers to design a new Personnel Building and several other structures. The Personnel Building was delayed and finally removed from their contract in September 1993 when staff was directed to prepare a schematic design by the Building Committee. In October 1994, staff submitted a schematic design to the Engineering and Construction (later renamed Planning, Design and Construction) Committee which recommended that staff be authorized to solicit proposals. The subsequent Planning, Design and Construction (PDC) Committee reexamined the concept of a Personnel Building in a space utilization study that would take a broader look at future office needs. At the November 1994 PDC Committee meeting, an Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization Study first delayed action due to uncertain funding. Since June a scope of work has been developed and a consultant selected to perform this study. The study consists of an analysis of existing facilities and work functions for the 320 person office staff at Plant No. 1. Using staffing forecasts for five and ten years, the consultant will optimize the use of existing facilities, develop interim measures as necessary, and prepare schematic and site plans of permanent facilities to serve future needs. A final report is scheduled to be presented for approval to the Boards of Directors on May 29, 1996. Statements of Qualification were received from 15 of 20 firms which indicated an interest in the project. Five firms were selected to receive a Request for Proposal and three of these made presentations to a staff selection committee. Budget Information MAJOR COST TABLE DESCRIPTION: Current Current Budget (3)' Design Costs Planning & Studies Consultant's Cost $200,000 (1)-$155,000 CSD Design Costs 79,909 46,450 Contractor Costs 0 (5)' CSD Construction Costs 0 Furnishings and Equipment (2)' 0 Agreement Costs 0 Permit Costs 0 Contingency @ 10% 2709 Total Costs: $298,000 $202,000 'NOTES: (1) Includes all approved changes to original PSA (2) Furnishings and equipment are not considered capital project costs and Hence are not actually a part of the project design and construction costs. The Districts purchases furniture and equipment after construction is complete under a separate contract. (3) Includes all approved changes to original budget (4) Includes all approved changes to original contract (5) Consultant's estimate of construction cost. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Ad Hoc Committee receive, file and approve the Ad Hoc Committee certification, and award a Professional Services Agreement to the Consultant selected by the Ad Hoc Committee. Ad Hoc Committee Recommendations to the Executive Committee The Executive Committee concurs with the Ad Hoc Committee recommendation regarding the following actions relative to the Professional Services Agreement with Coleman/Caskey Architects, Inc. for preparation of Space Utilization Study, Job No. J-38-1: (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization Study certification of the final negotiated fee with Coleman/Caskey Architects, Inc. for said services. (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 95-_, approving said agreement with Coleman/Caskey Architects, Inc. for said services on an hourly rate basis for labor plus overhead, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $155,550. Executive Committee Recommendation to the Joint Boards of Directors That the Joint Boards of Directors consider and approve the recommendations of the Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization Study. �.�wwoos5ucmxowsi iei.cva COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Boards of Directors Phone: County Sanitation Districts of 1714)962241I Orange County maJlrg adar..e: 10844 Ellis Avenue Ro.Boe 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Fountain v eay.CA 9272eB1 2] SUBJECT: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Professional Services Agreement with Coleman/Caskey Architects in Connection with District's Office 'Fs°Basa°Va�.QVenue y CA Space Utilization Study, Job No. J-38-1 92]OB-]018 In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional engineering services, the Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization has negotiated the following fee Member with Coleman/Caskey Architects for the analysis of existing office facilities and work Ag.nw. functions and development of office standards and an optimization plan in connection • with the District's Space Utilization Study, Job No. J-38-1, on an houdy-rate basis cause including labor plus overhead, plus subconsultants fees, and fixed profit, in an amount not to exceed $155,550. Anaheim area Buena Par: Engineering Services, Lypreae direct labor at hourly rates Fountain Mill, ll, plus overhead at 140%, not to exceed $ 98,840.00 on Hunungtan Beach Inoue Subconsultants Fees, not to exceed 46,450.00 to Habra Le Perna L.Alamit4. Fixed Profit 10,260.00 Newport Beach 0-.tpe Plaeencn TOTAL CONTRACT, not to exceed $155 550 00 Bence Ann seer Beach Semmh Tustin The Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization hereby certifies the above final negotiated wr.Par* fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in sorb.Linda excessive profits for the consultant. County of Orange San", UiatriRa /s/John Collins /s/ David A. Ludwin costa Me.. John Collins David A. Ludwin Garden cro„e Chairman Director of Engineering Midwwy city Ad Hoc Committee Ad Hoc Committee W.w MatHw Irvine Bench DAL:jac J iWPD0CTNGUJ8-IZC-PSA.LTR A Public Waste naw and Enwmnmental Management Agency CnmmlttedW Pr.recting the EhW err Score 7954 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS -� a ORANGE COUNTY, CAUFORNIA October 27, 1995 tOBCa eL5 nvFNUE MEMORANDUM �WMN Va ..CPl60RNu nnea,n mai M4411 TO: Director John Cox Director John Collins Director Don Griffin Director Peer Swan FROM: David A. Ludwi Director of Engines Kng SUBJECT: Selection of Consultant Districts' Office Space Utilization Study The staff Selection Committee heard the presentations of the three�highest rated Consultants for the Districts' Office Space Utilization Study on October 26 and recommends award to Coleman/Caskey Architects for their proposed fee of$155,550, Coleman/Caskey Architects has offered a strong team with depth, relevant experience, and balance. Their proposal is responsive to the scope of work and indicates an understanding of this agency. The expected advantages from this consultant are efficiency, cost tracking, quality, and valuable work function analysis. The second ranked firm, CHCG Architects, also has an excellent team, especially for site planning, but with significantly less experience in space studies for office consolidation or remodeling of existing facilities. The proposal and the team expressed an unusual appreciation of the site and elements which affect our attitudes. Gensler&Associates offered an excellent team that specializes in the work we are seeking. Their proposal is very thorough but it far exceeds our scope of work and our immediate needs. Proposed fees for the five consultants from which we received proposals are: 1. Coleman/Caskey Architects . . . . . . . $155,550 2. CHCG Architects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $114,000 3. Gensler 8 Associates . . . . . . . . . . . . $243,362 4. A. C. Martin/Sindik Olson . . . . . . . . . $ 89,769 5. LPA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 62,603 We are planning to meet in the Districts' offices at 12 noon on Tuesday, October 31, 1995 with the Ad Hoc Committee to discuss this selection and further actions. Please call me at extension 5000, if you have any questions. DAL:PAM:jac JAW PD0MENG%SPCSTUDYn UZ795.M1 - c: Don McIntyre Blake Anderson Judith Wilson Paul Mitchell November 8, 1995 DISTRICTS' OFFICE SPACE UTILIZATION STUDY CONSULTANT FINAL RATING SHEET Each reviewer rated each consultant in each of the three categories on a scale from I to 10, 10 being a perfect score. Ratings were averaged,weighted and totaled. SCORE COLUMN HEADINGS: 1. Blake Anderson 2.Judith Wilson 3.David Ludwin 4. Paul Mitchell A. Average score W. Weighted Score SCORES CHCG COLEMAWCASEEY CE ER& CATEGORY AssocrerEs 1 2 3 4 A W 1 2 13141 A W 1 2 3 4 A W Project Approach 60% 7 8 7 8 7.5 4.50 8 10 8 9 8.75 5.25 5 5 5 7 5.5 3.3 Thoroughness,Quality,Logic Appropriateness,Flexibility Staff involvement Relative emphasis Project Team 30% 8 5 7 7 6.75 2.02 7 6 8 9 7.50 2.25 5 5 7 8 6.25 1.87 Experience-relevance,quantity,inclusiveness Proposed use of expertise Project Manager Appropriaterims Firm 10% 78666.75 0.67 99 1 778.00 0.80 89788 0.8 Relevant experience Soundness,reputation TOTAL SCORE 7.2 8.3 6.0 mio-xw M.. JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING AGENDA FOR NOVEMBER 15, 1995 Agenda Item (12)(b)(2): CMTS95•036a Consideration of motion to void the Engineering Feasibility Studies Agreement with Southern California Edison (SCE) "ENVEST" Program approved at the July 26, 1995 Joint Boards' Meeting; and, authorizing the General Manager to enter into a new comprehensive Agreement with the SCE "ENVEST" Program to study energy conservation measures at the Districts' treatment plants, with no change in the previously authorized amount of $30,000.00, to add design and construction portions to SCE funding with provisions that actual execution of the design and construction phases are subject to future authorization by the Districts' Board of Directors. Summary The Districts'Board of Directors authorized staff in July 1995 to enter into an Engineering Feasibility Study with Southern California Edison (SCE) for an amount not to exceed $30,000. The study has been assigned to HDR Engineering, an environmental consulting firm. The Feasibility Study will be completed in December 1995. Staff is requesting authorization to void the present Feasibility Study Agreement and enter into a new Agreement with SCE to provide a Feasibility Study,design and construction. The authorization request would allow the Districts to take advantage of the present ENVEST Program,which ends December 31, 1995 and has subsidies up to 20%of project cost to potentially fund marginally cost-effective projects. Subsidies will not be a part of future ENVEST funding.The projects that are recommended for design from the Feasibility Study will be reviewed with the Directors for authorization to proceed as would construction of those projects. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the Board of Directors authorize the General Manager to enter into an Agreement with SCE'ENVEST'to perform a Feasibility Study with the previously authorized maximum of not to exceed $30,000,design and construction of energy conservation measures. OMTS Committee Recommendation The OMTS Committee recommends authorizing the General Manager to enter into an Agreement with SCE 'ENVEST'to perform a Feasibility Study within the previously authorized maximum of not to exceed$30,000, design and construction of energy conservation measures. Executive Committee Recommendation to the Joint Boards of Directors The Executive Committee recommends that the Joint Boards of Directors concur in the recommendations of the OMTS Committee. .rpvvoxiesvcaswovaarass.cm n a 0 n,m October 18, 1995 STAFF REPORT OMTS95-036a: Consideration of a motion authorizing the General Manager to void the present Feasibility Study Agreement with Southern California Edison (SCE) "ENVEST" and enter into a new comprehensive Agreement with the SCE "ENVEST" Program to prepare the present Feasibility Study and to add design and construction portions to SCE funding for the work with the provision that actual execution of the design and construction phases are subject to future authorization by the Districts' Board of Directors. Background The Southern California Edison (SCE) Company is sponsoring a program called ENVEST to assist customers in implementing energy conservation projects. SCE will provide overall contract administration of the project including preparation of Feasibility Studies, project design and construction of cost-effective energy conservation measures. The cost of the projects (study, design and construction) will be paid by the customer on future utility bills, offset by the electricity savings of the project. Districts staff and HDR Engineering (HDR), an environmental consultant, developed a list of projects at Treatment Plant No. 1 and No. 2 that meet the SCE ENVEST program qualification criteria. The submitted projects met SCE's criteria for cost-effective projects. The energy conservation measures identified provide an estimated savings of 7.000,000 kilowatt hours annually. The potential electricity savings represent about 7% of the Districts' present treatment plant annual electricity usage. The estimated savings is $240,000 per year. The specific energy conservation projects are listed below: Plant No. 1: • Plant water system revisions • Trickling filter inlet piping modifications • Digester mixing control modifications • Dewatered sludge cake pumping modifications CSDOC 0 P.O.B.8127 • Fountain Valley.CA92728-8127 0 (714)982.2411 ai OMTS95-036a Page 2 of 3 October 18, 1995 Plant No. 2: • Plant water system revisions • Modifications to the cryogenic compressor Based on its favorable review of the project, SCE developed a Proposal Development Agreement for the Districts to contract for the ENVEST Program Engineering Feasibility Study at an estimated cost of$24,000. The July 1995 OMITS Committee and Board of Directors authorized staff to expend an amount not to exceed $30,000 to provide engineering for additional projects beyond the six listed above. The project costs for the six projects listed above, the Feasibility Study, design and construction have been estimated to be$24,000, $130,000 and 1.7 to 1.9 million, respectively. Project payback is estimated to be seven to eight years based on the $240,000 per year savings. The Feasibility Study previously authorized by the Board has started and will be completed in December 1995. Districts staff evaluated consulting engineering firms that had been pre-qualified by SCE. HDR was chosen as the most qualified energy conservation consultant and was familiar with the Districts project. The present project approach approved by the Board in July 1995, would have had three Agreements with SCE. An Agreement would have been reviewed for approval by the Directors at the study, design and construction phases. Staff is requesting the Board consider an alternative that would void the present Agreement and request authorization for the General Manager to sign a new agreement with SCE to provide a Feasibility Study in accordance with the existing not- to-exceed $30,000 authorization, design and construction of energy conservation projects. Signing a new agreement for all three phases of the work at this time is a non-substantive change. The schedule of work, project schedule and the Directors' approval process will be exactly the same for the projects as had been envisioned under the existing approach. Staff is requesting the change in Agreement scope to secure all of the SCE ENVEST funds available for the three phases of the project. Because the present ENVEST funds subsidies program for marginal projects ends December 31, 1995, we will otherwise lose the second and third phase funding opportunities. As before, the Directors will have to authorize expenditures prior to proceeding with Phases 11 and III (design and construction). Y OMTS95.036a Page 3 of 3 October 18, 1995 Summary There are two alternatives to complete the energy conservation projects with the SCE ENVEST program. The staff recommendation change above could allow funding of some marginally cost-effective projects with SCE subsidy funds. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the Board of Directors void the present Feasibility Study Agreement with SCE and authorize the General Manager to enter into a new Agreement with Southern California Edison °ENVEST" to provide a Feasibility Study with a not to exceed amount of$30,000, design and construction of energy conservation measures. RJO:dk T9GLOBAU950PODKAPT Onginator: R. Ooten Dept Head: R. Ooten JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS FF REGULAR MEETING AGENDA FOR NOVEMBER 15, 1995 Agenda Item (12)(b)(3): PDC95-34 Consideration of Resolution No. 95-110, approving plans and specifications for Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-35-3; Process Area Fire Protection, Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job Nos. PI.385 and P2-46; and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. P255; and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids (Tentative bid date is January 9, 1996). Summary The plans and specifications for these projects are now complete and ready for bidding. The tentative bid date is January 9, 1996. Attached is a Staff Report that outlines the work contained in these projects in more detail. Budget Information The Engineers Estimates for these projects are as follows: Job No.P2-35-3 $ 3.000.000 Job No.P1-38-5 2,500.000 Job No.P2-46 3,700,000 Job No.P2-55 4,000.000 Total $13,200,000 Staff Recommendation That the PDC Committee recommend approval of the plans and specifications,and authorize the General Manager to advertise and receive bids on January 9, 1996. PDC Committee Recommendation The PDC Committee concurs with the staff recommendations. Executive Committee Recommendation to the Joint Boards of Directors That the Joint Boards of Directors consider the resolution approving the plans and specifications, and authorizing the General Manager to advertise and receive bids on January 9, 1996. r:�wvooccuwxevsv1ovenissi.cva V COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS d ORANGE COUNTY, CAUFORNIA November 2, 1995 105aa BASS AVBNUE P4 BOX 6127 MUWNN VG Y.MUM"%92728E127 P1419824411 STAFF REPORT PDC9534: Consideration of the following actions re Maintenance Building at Plant No.2,Job No.132-353; Process Area Fire Protection,Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plants Nos.1 and 2,Job Nos. P1384 and P2-46; and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No.2,Job No. P2-55 Summary The construction bid package,Warehouse Building at Plant No.2,Job No. 132-35-2;Maintenance Building at Plant No.2,Job No.P-35-3;Process Area Fire Protection,Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No.2,Job No.P2-46;and Office Trailer Relocations at Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Specification No.W044(Rebid)and M-044-1,was first approved by this Committee at the January 5, 1995 meeting. The final approval was to be solicited from the General Board in February 1995,however,due to the bankruptcy,the Rem was withheld from the agenda. Subsequent to the above events,the Committee took actions to further delay the project due to questions regarding the warehouse building and the process area fire protection,signage and waste distribution system modifications. Subsequent Board actions have occurred which led to the reorganization of the original package. In June 1995,the Directors approved an amended agreement with Frontier Pacific Insurance Company to settle the dispute regarding Office Trailer Relocations at Plants Nos. 1 and 2,Specification No.W044 and awarded this project for construction. The Warehouse Building was removed from the package at the direction of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee and the Ad Hoc Committee. The Ad Hoc Committee is further reviewing warehouse. In June 1995,the Boards approved the POC Committees affirmation of the need for the Process Area Fire Protection,Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plants Nos. 1 and 2. Additionally,in April 1993,the Boards approved a professional services agreement with Black and Veatch to prepare plans and specifications for Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications for Plant No.2,Job No. P2-55 which are now complete. The projects now included in this package are Maintenance Building at Plant No.2,Job No. P2-35-3; Process Area Fire Protection, Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plants Nos. 1 and 2,Job Nos. P1-38-5 and P2A6;and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No.2,Job No. P2-55. The Maintenance Building,the City Water Pump Station at Plant No.2 and portions of the Chemical and Plant Water Facilities will be constructed in areas adjacent to each other. Since all the plans and specifications for these projects are now complete,staff recommends bidding these facilities together to eliminate construction coordination issues. Including the City Water Modifications at Plant No. 1 in this bid package will allow for better value since the equipment and materials required for the Plant 1 and Plant 2 projects are similar. Staff Recommendation A That the PDC Committee recommend approval of the plans and specifications and any subsequent addenda,and authorize the General Manager to advertise and receive bids. B. That the PDC Committee authorize award of a construction contract at the next Joint Boards meeting to the lowest responsive bidder in an amount not to exceed the approved engineer's estimated amount If the low bid is above the estimate,staff will seek direction from the Directors at the next Joint Boards meeting. WS:jac J.XW PD0MENG\MGRRPTS\SR 11-02.95 P DESCRIPTION: Current Current Current Expended To Date: Budget(3)• Design Costs Construction Costs (4)• DESIGN: CONSTR: Planning & Studies Consultant's Cost $250,000 $150,000 $45,000 $150,000 CSD Design Costs $215,000 $215,000 — $137,000 Contractor Costs $3,000,000 (5)•$3,000,000 (4)•— — — CSD Construction Costs $210,000 — $150,000 Furnishings and Equipment — — — (2) Agreement Costs — — Permit Costs $25,000 $25,000 — $23,000 Contingency @ 10% $300,000 — — Total Costs: $4,000,000 $3,390,000 $195,000 $310,000 'NOTES: (1) Includes all approved changes to original PSA (2) Furnishings and equipment are not considered capital project costs and Hence are not actually a part of the project design and construction costs. The Districts purchases furniture and equipment after construction is complete under a separate contract. (3) Includes all approved changes to original budget (4) Includes all approved changes to original contract (5) Consultant's estimate of construction cost. ENG70RMMMJR-00ST.TBL REVISED:M MAJOR COST TABLE FOR JOBS NOS. P1-38-5 AND P2-46 DESCRIPTION: Current Current Current Expended To Data: Budget(3)' Design Costs Construction Costs(4r DESIGN: CONSTR. Planning &Studies Consultant's Cost $750,000 (1p$611,956 $98,354 $566,975 CSD Design Costs $200,000 $200,000 — $177,930 Contractor Costs $6,200,000 (5)•$6,200,000 (4)'— — — CSD Construction Costs $210,000 — $210,000 Furnishings and Equipment — — — — (2) Agreement Costs — — — Permit Costs — — — Contingency @ 10% $620,000 — — Total Costs: $7,980,000 $7,011,956 $308,354 $744,905 *NOTES: (1) Includes all approved changes to original PSA (2) Furnishings and equipment are not considered capital project costs and Hence are not actually a part of the project design and construction costs. The Districts purchases furniture and equipment after construction is complete under a separate contract. (3) Includes all approved changes to original budget (4) Includes all approved changes to original contract (5) Consultant's estimate of construction cost. ENGIFORMSUA-COST.TSL REVISED:&95 9 DESCRIPTION: Current Current Current Expended To Date: Budget(3)' Design Costs Construction Costs (4)' DESIGN: CONSTR: Planning &Studies Consultant's Cost $367.000 (1)-$367.610 $298,747 CSD Design Costs $91,000 $91,000 — $77,000 Contractor Costs $4,000,000 (sr$4,000,000 (4)'— — — CSD Construction Costs $122,000 $122,000 Furnishings and Equipment — — — (2)' Agreement Costs — — — Permit Costs Contingency a 10% $400,000 $400,000 — Total Costs: $4,980,000 $4,980,000 $357,747 'NOTES: (1) Includes all approved changes to original PSA (2) Furnishings and equipment are not considered capital project costs and Hence are not actually a part of the project design and construction costs. The Districts purchases furniture and equipment after construction is complete under a separate contract- (3) Includes all approved changes to original budget (4) Includes all approved changes to original contract (5) Consultant's estimate of construction cost. ENGTORMSVULR-COST.TBL REVISED:8*5 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING AGENDAFOR NOVEMBER 15, 1995 Agenda Item (12)(b)(4): PDC95-36 Consideration of motion authorizing staff to solicit proposals for professional services agreements for planning, design and construction services for projects, as follows: (a) Investigation and Repair of Ocean Outfalls, Job No. J-39 (b) Management of Peak Hydraulic Discharge, Job No. J-40-1 (c) Determination of Financial Charges and Fee Structures, Job No. J-40-2 Summary It is proposed to begin work on these three,separate projects, and to have the work completed under several Professional Services Agreements. Project No. 1 is the investigation,cleaning and repair of the Districts'ocean disposal system. As part of this project,the Districts will make permanent repairs to the outfall end gate on the operating 120-inch outfall which opened in January 1995 when record flow passed through the plant Project No.2 Includes the determination of peak flows in the Districts'collection,treatment and disposal system and examine ways to reduce the peaks and/or find alternate ways to discharge the treated wastewater flows culminating in an effort to delay or negate the need for a second deep ocean outfall. Project No.3 will examine the Districts'existing Capital Facilities Connection Charge,annual Sanitary Sewer Use Charge and Excess Capacity Charge with a goal of obtaining the most equitable financial plan possible. Projects 2 and 3 will share common land use data and are planned to be completed as one project. Staff Recommendation Recommend that staff be authorized to request proposals for the three projects described above. OMTS Committee Recommendation The OMTS Committee recommends support of this Item by the PDC Committee. PDC Committee Recommendation That staff be authorized to request proposals on the three projects described above. Executive Committee Recommendation to the Joint Boards of Directors That the Joint Boards of Directors concur in the recommendation of the PDC Committee. L—esw0ves12M. R COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA V_ October 19, 1995 1�EWSAV Nur V o.BOX 8127 MUWXN VLL Y.W MANIA 92728-8127 STAFF REPORT 9141M4411 PDC95-36: Approval of Request to Issue Proposals for Professional Services for Investigation and Repair of Ocean Outfalls, Management of Peak Hydraulic Discharge, and Determination of Financial Charges Summary Staff is proposing to begin work on three separate, but related projects. The first project is the investigation and rehabilitation of the Districts' two ocean outfalls. The second project will determine our peak hydraulic demand and ways to both reduce that peak demand and/or delay or eliminate the need for a second deep water ocean outfall. The third project will review our current methods for assessing charges for the collection, treatment and disposal services provided. Background The first project is the investigation, cleaning and repair of our ocean outfalls. We propose to hire a consultant to manage several related projects on both the operating 120-inch, 5-mile outfall and the older, standby 7,000-foot, 78-inch outfall. The project will include investigation of the condition of the interior and cleaning of the 120-inch outfall, cleaning plugged diffuser ports in both outfalls and making a permanent repair to the end gate on the 120-inch outfall. Much of the proposed work is Master Plan related, and the land use data necessary for the Management of Peak Hydraulic Discharge and Determination of Financial Charges is nearly identical. These reports could be part of a new Master Plan, which is needed; however, because we have not yet received the Federal and State issued Ocean Discharge Permit applied for in 1989, it is premature to do a full Master Plan. Our 1989 Master Plan, prepared in the 1987-1989 period, calls for construction of significant facilities, such as a second deep water outfall, a project that could cost over$100 million. The high flows passed in January 1995 through the collection, treatment, and disposal facilities confirmed that we either have to start work soon on these facilities, or find other means to reduce or discharge the peak flow. Thus, starting the hydraulic portion of the Districts' Master Plan is timely. Concurrently, staff has been reviewing the three principle financial charges for sewer service, the one-time capital facilities connection charge ($2,350.00 per dwelling unit, $470.00 per 1,000 square feet for other uses, the excess capacity charge, and the annual sanitary sewer use charge. It is proposed to study revisions which could result in recommendations to better equate use with benefit, all on a neutral revenue change basis. Budget Staff estimates the total cost of the projects including Consultant, staff, repair, and overhead charges as follows: • Investigation, Repair of Existing Outfalls $ 630,000 • Management of Peak Hydraulic Discharge $1,150,000 • Financial Analysis $ 390,000 The Management of Peak Hydraulic Discharge will be an integral part of a new Master Plan. In 1989, the total cost of our 2020 Master Plan was approximately $4.5 million. The Districts believe the new Master Plan, which will include future volumes on treatment, reuse and support issues, plus compliance with CEQA and public participation, will cost approximately$3 million, including the $1,150,000 for Management of Peak Hydraulic Discharge. Staff Recommendation Authorize staff to proceed with the issuance of Request for Proposal for the three (3) projects described above. J:Wa000n"GRR n IIZI M 9 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING AGENDA FOR NOVEMBER 15, 1995 Agenda Item (12(b)(5): FAHR95-38 Consideration of Resolution No. 95-111, approving Professional Services Agreement with Kerry Consulting Group for preparation of New Financial Information System, Phase III, Selection Process for Hardware and Software; and Phase IV, Implementation and Acceptance of the Selected Hardware and Software Solutions (Specification No. P-167), on an hourly-rate basis including labor, overhead, direct expenses and profit, plus out-of-pocket costs, for an amount not to exceed $58,263.00. Summary: At the October 1994 Fiscal Policy Committee meeting, the consulting firm of Deloilte &Touche delivered an extensive Request For Proposal (RFP) for the acquisition and installation of a new financial information system within the Districts' Finance Department. At that time, the Committee had decided to form an ad hoc subcommittee to review the RFP and to report their findings back to the Committee. At the January 18, 1995 meeting, the Finance and Personnel Committee made the decision to have the consulting firm of Ernst &Young review the RFP in conjunction with their review and evaluation of the Finance Department. In their July 1995 report on the Finance Function Review, Ernst & Young recommended a number of enhancements to the RFP including: • Additional functionality requirements in the area of Project Accounting and Cashiering. • Expanded functionality in the Contracts Subsystem area. • Functionality requirements for the Human Resource application. Staff Recommendation 1. Direct staff to solicit bids for a professional consulting agreement for the completion of Phase III, Selection Process for Hardware and Software, and Phase IV, Implementation and Acceptance of the Selected Hardware and Software Solutions for the Financial Information System project 2. Approve for release the Request For Proposal for a Financial Information System. Distribution of the RFP will be made to appropriate vendors as identified by the selected professional consulting firm hired to complete Phases III and IV. y FAHR Recommendation to the Executive Committee Consideration of Resolution No. 95-111, approving Professional Services Agreement with Kerry Consulting Group for preparation of New Financial Information System, Phase III, Selection Process for Hardware and Software; and Phase IV, Implementation and Acceptance of the Selected Hardware and Software Solutions (Specification No. P-167), on an hourly-rate basis including labor, overhead, direct expenses and profit, plus out-of-pocket costs, for an amount not to exceed $58,263.00. Executive Committee Recommendation to the Joint Boards of Directors The Executive Committee concurs in the recommendation of'the FAHR Committee. ,�w000casuc�wovesn mscm 9 November 7, 1995 STAFF REPORT FAHR95-38: Selection of Consultant for the Completion of Phase III and Phase IV F.I.S. Project At the October 11, 1995 FAHR meeting, the committee approved the request for proposal (RFP) for a financial information system which concluded Phase I, the Financial Information Needs Assessment, and Phase II, the Preparation of a RFP for a Financial Information System (F.I.S.) performed by Deloitte Touche. The committee also authorized staff to solicit proposals for professional consulting services for the purpose of completing Phase III, Selection Process for Hardware and Software, and Phase IV, Implementation and Acceptance of the Selected Hardware and Software Solutions. Proposals for professional services were received from four firms specializing in F.I.S. consulting, A.E.F. Systems Consulting, Ernst &Young, Intelligent Directions Consulting, and Kerry Consulting Group. The Director of Finance, Controller, Human Resources Supervisor, and Software Systems Manager reviewed the proposals and interviewed all four firms on Thursday, November 2, and Friday, November 3. Attached is a matrix indicating the results of staffs review. The matrix contains the selected criteria used to evaluate the firms along with the weighted average score achieved by each firm and the weighted average total for each firm. The highest scoring firm, Kerry Consulting Group, was also the top individual choice by each of the evaluators. The evaluators believe that Kerry Consulting Group have the most to offer the Districts in terms of experience, expertise, and approach. Kerry Consulting Group also submitted the lowest fee to perform Phase III and IV at a cost not to exceed $58,263. Budast Information The fees for the completion of Phase III and IV of the F.I.S. project are included in the Joint Works budget for 1995-96. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee recommend approval of a professional services agreement to complete Phase III and Phase IV of the F.I.S. project with Kerry Consulting Group at a cost not to exceed $58,263. C1WPDATATIMCONSHORT.MDW PROFESSIONAL F.I.S. SERVICE PROPOSAL EVALUATION RANKING WEIGHTED AVERAGE SCORE CRITERIA MAX. A.E.F. Ernst & Intelligent Kerry SCORE Systems Young Directions Consulting Exoertise and Experience Past experience on comparable F.I.S. selection engagements. 15 12 13 8 14 Quality of firm's professional personnel assigned to the engagement. 20 18 16 11 19 Quality of firm's management support. 20 20 16 9 19 Approach Adequacy of proposed assistance. 15 15 9 9 15 Adequacy of F.I.S. selection approach. 10 9 10 6 10 Adequacy of F.I.S. implementation approach 10 9 8 7 10 The degree of anticipated support require- ments of Districts' Staff 10 9 6 6 10 Totals 100 92 78 56 97 Fees- Reasonableness of fees & hours (Info. only - short list evaluation criteria) Total Fees $97,200 $181,374 Open $58,263 Total Hours 880 hrs. 830 hrs. Open 630 hrs. Avg. Hourly Rate $110 per hr. $219 per hr. $95 per hr. $92 per hr. C:\ PDATAT IS\CONR NK MDW JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS y REGULAR MEETING AGENDA FOR NOVEMBER 15, 1995 Agenda Item (12)(b)(6): FAHR95-44 Consideration of Resolution No. 95-112, Revising Districts' Procedure for Settlement of Claims Made Against the Districts; Settlement of Claims Made by the Districts; Collection of Delinquent Accounts Owing to the Districts; Settlement of Civil or Administrative Actions; and Settlement of Worker's Compensation Actions; and repealing Resolution Nos. 93-13 and 90-89. Summary The Directors have approved Resolutions in 1990 and 1993 which establish staffs authority to settle different types of claims by and against the Districts. The purposes of this proposed Resolution are to combine the existing authorities into one Resolution and to revise the dollar thresholds of the authority levels. The authority levels proposed will parallel those recently approved for purchases and other authority delegations in Resolution No. 95-62. A copy of the proposed resolution showing the changes and a copy of the revised resolution are attached. The changes which are summarized in Attachment "A" can be summarized as: • Increase settlement authority for the Claims Committee (General Manager, General Counsel, Director of Finance) from $25,000 to $50,000 for claims made against the Districts. • Increase staff (Director of Technical Services, Director of Finance, General Counsel) authority to settle claims made by the Districts against Industrial Waste Permiltees from $25,000 to $50,000, • Increase term of payment schedules authorized by staff for Source Control Permitlees from six months to twenty-four months. • Increase the authority of the Director of Finance from $2,500 to $5,000 to: (a) file a collection claim in Small Claims Court; (b) assign a claim to a collection agency; and (c) write off debts deemed uncollectible. • Increase the Claims Committee authority to settle Workers Compensation claims from $10,000 to $25,000 exclusive of medical costs. Q 1 Had the revised limit been in place for the past three years, the amounts written off by authority of level would have been: Write-off Authority , 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 No, Amount No. Amount No. Amount: Finance Director 3 $1,485 10 $4,253 5 $2,300 After Collection Agency After Small Claims 1 $2,095 4 $10,336 3 $6,374 Court Collection Committee 1 1 $6,746 1 1 $5.013 1 $6,748 Boards of Directors 3 1 $105,877 1 $67,771 Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of Resolution No. 95112, Revising Districts' Procedure for Settlement of Claims Made Against the Districts; Settlement of Claims Made by the Districts; Collection of Delinquent Accounts Owing to the Districts; Settlement of Civil or Administrative Actions; and Settlement of Worker's Compensation Actions. FAHR Committee Recommendation to the Executive Committee The FAHR Committee concurs in the recommendation of staff. Executive Committee Recommendation to the Joint Boards of Directors The Executive Committee concurs in the recommendation of the FAHR Committee. .rnvaooc�awncwwovun,me.cvrs FAHR95-44 ATTACHMENT "A" STAFF AUTHORITY LEVELS Claims Made By or Against Districts November 1995 Maximum Limits` " Existing Proposed Liability Claims Against CSD: Independent Administrator $ 1,000 $ 5,000 Gen'I. Mgr., Dir. Fin., Gen'I Counsel 25,000 50,000 Debts Owed to CSD: Director of Finance $ 250 S 1,000 After Collection Agency 2,500 5,000 After Small Claims Court 2,500 5,000 Gen'I. Mgr., Dir. Fin., Gen'I Counsel 25,000 50,000 Industrial Waste Fees & Charges: Dir. Tech. Serv., Dir. Fin., Gen'I Counsel $25,000 $ 50,000 Deferred Payment Agreement Term 6 Months 24 Months Worker's Compensation Claims:* Independent Administrator $ 1,000 $ 5,000 Gen'I. Mgr., Dir. Fin., Gen'I Counsel 10,000 25,000 'Excludes medical costs. x,wa000asnamwovRs,me.cvn RESOLUTION NO. REVISING DISTRICTS PROCEDURE FOR SETTLEMENT OF CLAIMS MADE AGAINST THE DISTRICTS: SETTLEMENT OF CLAIMS MADE BY THE DISTRICTS: COLLECTION OF DELINQUENT ACCOUNTS OWING TO THE DISTRICTS: SETTLEMENT OF CIVIL OR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS: AND SETTLEMENT OF WORKER'S COMPENSATION ACTIONS A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING DISTRICT PROCEDURES FOR SETTLEMENT OF CLAIMS MADE AGAINST THE DISTRICTS; SETTLEMENT OF CLAIMS MADE BY THE DISTRICTS; COLLECTION OF DELINQUENT ACCOUNTS OWING TO THE DISTRICTS; SETTLEMENT OF CIVIL OR ADMINISTRATIVE ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS; SETTLEMENT OF WORKER'S COMPENSATION ACTIONS; AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NOS. 93- 13 and 90-89 WHEREAS, claims for damages alleging personal injuries, bodily injuries, including death, and damages to real and personal property, are periodically made against the Districts; and WHEREAS, the Districts presently have no liability insurance in force, having previously determined to be self-insured; and, WHEREAS, the Districts have the need for the retention of claims administration services and legal counsel who shall be vested within certain limited authority to accomplish a favorable disposition of claims made against the Districts; and, WHEREAS, the Districts have occasion to seek recovery against persons or entities who have caused loss or damage to the Districts, who have been assessed fines, charges or special fees relating to their use of District facilities, or who have been the subject of civil or administrative enforcement proceedings for violation of the 1 Districts' Wastewater Discharge Regulations Ordinance; and, WHEREAS, in the course of conducting the business affairs of the Districts, certain accounts receivable or other obligations owing to the Districts become delinquent, and in fad, uncollectible; and, WHEREAS, cost efficiency relating to collection of delinquent accounts can be greatly improved by the adoption of certain policies relating to the collection of said accounts; and, WHEREAS, claims for Workers' Compensation damages alleging personal injuries, including death, are periodically made against the Districts; and, WHEREAS, the Districts presently have no Workers' Compensation insurance in force, having previously determined to be legally self-insured, and, WHEREAS, the Districts have retained a claims administration service firm and special legal counsel who shall be vested with certain limited authority to accomplish a favorable disposition of Workers' Compensation claims made against the Districts; and, WHEREAS, cost efficiency relating to resolution of Workers' Compensation claims can be greatly improved by the adoption of certain policies relating to the resolution of said claims. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY DETERMINE, RESOLVE AND ORDER: 2 ARTICLE I SETTLEMENT OF LIABILITY CLAIMS MADE AGAINST DISTRICTS Section 1.1: A liability reserve has been established for the payment of claims made against the Districts. Said reserve shall continue to be provided in each annual budget to ensure that sufficient funds are on deposit to provide for payment of those amounts incurred as a liability loss or expense. Section 1.2: Each annual budget shall provide, in addition to the reserve established by Section 1.1, for the necessary funds to provide a sufficient balance to meet projected expenses for loss and payment of claims during the ensuing fiscal year. Section 1.3: A claims administration firm is authorized to be retained, and said firm is hereby granted authorization to make payments and settlements of claims made against the Districts in an amount not to exceed $5,000.00 per claimant. Said firm shall be retained in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in an agreement approved by the General Counsel. Section 1.4: A committee comprised of the General Manager or his designee, the Director of Finance and the General Counsel are authorized to review and make full settlement of any claims made against the Districts for contract or liability damages not otherwise covered by insurance by payment of a sum not to exceed $50,000.00 per claimant. In the event a claim results in litigation, which is being legally defended by other than the Districts' General Counsel, this committee shall review and provide the approval to the Districts' special legal counsel within the same limits. Section 1.5: All claims for damages resulting in a judgment or a recommended 3 settlement by negotiation in an amount exceeding $50,000.00 per claimant, shall be submitted to and approved by the Board of Directors of the defendant District or the Joint Boards in the event of claims made against the Joint Districts. Section 1.6: The General Counsel is authorized to retain the services of special legal counsel for purposes of representing the Districts in the defense of any claim or matter of litigation, whenever it is determined that specialized expertise or experience is desirable, a conflict of interest exists or could arise with the office of General Counsel or that the workload of the office of General Counsel requires the utilization of special counsel. ARTICLE II COLLECTION OF DELINQUENT OBLIGATIONS OWING TO THE DISTRICTS Section 2.1: The Director of Finance is authorized to write off as an uncollectible debt any delinquent obligation owing to the Districts in excess of 90 days and not exceeding the sum of$1,000.00. Section 2.2: The Director of Finance, in his discretion, is authorized to assign for collection to a person or firm of his choosing, any delinquent obligation owing to the Districts in excess of 45 days and not exceeding the sum of$5,000.00. Ninety (90) days after assigning the obligation for collection, the Director of Finance is authorized to write off as an uncollectible debt, any portion of the obligation which is still outstanding. Section 2.3: The Director of Finance, in his discretion, is authorized to file the necessary proceedings in the Small Claims Court of the appropriate judicial district of the County of Orange in order to collect any delinquent obligation owing to the Districts 4 in excess of 45 days and not exceeding the sum of$5,000.00. Upon obtaining a judgment in favor of the Districts, the Director of Finance and General Counsel shall take all legal measures necessary to enforce the terms of the judgment. Ninety (90) days after receiving a final judgment in favor of the Districts, the Director of Finance, with the concurrence of General Counsel is authorized to write off as an uncollectible debt, any portion of the obligation which is still outstanding. Section 2.4: Notwithstanding the authority provided in Sections 2.2 and 2.3 above, any obligation owing to the Districts, not exceeding the sum of$50,000.00, may be compromised by acceptance of a sum less than the full amount due or may be written off as uncollectible, upon that determination being made, after investigation by a committee comprised of the General Manager, or his designee, General Counsel and Director of Finance. Section 2.5: The Director of Finance shall forward any delinquent obligation in excess of$50,000.00 to the General Counsel for the Districts, who shall submit his recommendation to the Boards of Directors as to the method of collection or disposition of said account. Section 2.6: In addition to the above authorization, the Director of Finance is directed to exercise all available lawful methods to ensure prompt and full recovery of all obligations owing to the Districts. Section 23: The Director of Finance is authorized to offset against any sums held on deposit by the Districts on behalf of any person or entity who owes a delinquent obligation to the Districts. Section 2.8: The Director of Finance is authorized to withhold the approval of 5 any such permits otherwise to be issued by the Districts to any person or entity who has an outstanding debt obligation owing to the Districts until such time as said debt obligation is paid in full. Section 2.9: Delinquent obligations, as used in this Resolution, shall include any invoice submitted by the Districts for services rendered or for reimbursement of damages caused to District property or personnel, which has not been paid within (a) the time prescribed by the District ordinance or resolution; or(b)forty-five (45) days, whichever is later, from the date of invoice. ARTICLE III COLLECTION OF FEES AND CHARGES RELATING TO INDUSTRIAL WASTE DISCHARGES Section 3.1: In the event any fees or charges, up to the amount of$50,000.00, are owed by an Industrial Waste Permittee and are delinquent or in dispute between the Permittee and District, a committee comprised of the Director of Finance, Director of Technical Services and General Counsel are authorized to negotiate and enter into, on behalf of the Districts, a settlement agreement relating to the financial obligation owing to the Districts. This Section shall not apply to excess capacity charges, nor enforcement actions which are provided for in Article IV below. Said agreement shall be based upon a showing of good cause and a reasonable dispute between the Districts and the Permittee, and can provide for acceptance of a sum less than the full amount claimed as due by the District. This agreement may be entered into prior to or during the pendency of any litigation filed by the Districts to collect the amount owed. Section 3.2: Upon written request and establishment of good cause by an 6 1 industrial waste permittee, the committee of the Director of Finance, Director of Technical Services and General Counsel may negotiate and enter into a deferred payment agreement with the permittee in accordance with the guidelines established herein. Said agreement may be incorporated as part of, or separate and in addition to, any enforcement compliance agreements authorized by the provisions of the Districts' Wastewater Discharge Regulations Ordinance. Section 3.2.1: The installment payment agreement shall be for a maximum term not to exceed twenty-four (24) months. The agreement shall provide for payment of interest on the principal amount owing at a rate equal to the Federal Reserve Board prime rate plus 2-1/2%. The prime rate shall be established as the rate set and in effect by the Los Angeles Federal Reserve Bank, on the date of the agreement. The agreement shall provide for payment of all costs of preparing and administering the payment agreement, including legal and administrative costs. Section 3.2.2: The agreement shall stipulate the penalties to which the permittee shall be subjected in the event of nonpayment of any of the payments specified in the agreement, including initiation of legal action or permit suspension or revocation, as recommended by the General Counsel and the Director of Technical Services. Section 3.3: If the delinquent obligation is greater than $50,000.00, any compromise settlement or any deferred payment agreement shall be submitted to and approved by the Boards of Directors, who shall prescribe the terms and conditions. ARTICLE IV SETTLEMENT OF CIVIL ADMINISTRATIVE ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS Section 4.1: In the event that the Districts initiate or intend to initiate any civil or administrative enforcement actions based upon alleged violations of the Districts' Wastewater Discharge Regulations Ordinance, a committee comprised of the Director of Finance, Director of Technical Services, and the General Counsel are authorized to negotiate and enter into, on behalf of the Districts, a settlement agreement, which may include both payment to District in an amount up to $50,000.00 and enforcement compliance orders deemed appropriate to ensure compliance with the Wastewater Discharge Regulations Ordinance. This agreement may be entered into prior to or during the pendency of any administrative proceeding or litigation enforcement action. Section 4.2: The committee of the Director of Finance, Director of Technical Services, and General Counsel may negotiate and enter into a settlement agreement which includes a schedule of payments over a period of time not to exceed twenty-four (24) months, by the person or entity which is the subject of the enforcement action. The agreement shall provide for payment of interest on the principal amount owing at a rate equal to the Federal Reserve Board prime rate plus 2-1l2%. The prime rate shall be established as the rate set and in effect by the Los Angeles Federal Reserve Bank on the date of the agreement. Section 4.3: If the proposed settlement involves the payment of an amount greater than $50,000.00, the settlement shall be submitted for approval by the Board of Directors of the involved District or the Joint Boards in the event of an enforcement 8 action involving the Joint Districts. ARTICLE V SETTLEMENT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS MADE AGAINST THE DISTRICTS Section 5.1. A minimum liability reserve has been established in the amount of $250,000.00 for the payment of claims made against the Districts. Said minimum amount shall continue to be provided for in each annual budget to ensure that sufficient funds are on deposit to provide for payment of those amounts incurred as a liability loss or expense; and Section 5.2. Each annual budget shall provide, in addition to the reserve established by Section 5.1, for the sufficient funds to provide a sufficient balance to meet projected expenses for payment of claims during the ensuing fiscal year; and Section 5.3. A claims administration firm is authorized to be retained, and said firm is hereby granted authorization to make payments and settlements of claims made against the Districts in an amount not to exceed $5,000.00 per claimant. Said firm shall be retained in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in an agreement approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 5.4. In addition to special legal counsel selected by the Districts' Workers' Compensation administrator, the General Counsel is authorized to retain the services of special legal counsel for purposes of representing the Districts in the defense of any Workers' Compensation claim, wherein he determines that specialized expertise is desirable or that the workload requires the utilization of outside counsel; and, 9 Section 5.5. A committee comprised of the General Manager, or his assignee, Director of Finance and General Counsel are authorized to review and make full settlement of any Workers' Compensation claim made against the Districts by payment of a sum not to exceed $25,000.00 in addition to the actual medical expenses and temporary disability payments per claimant. In the event a claim results in litigation, which is being legally defended by other than the Districts' General Counsel, this committee shall review and provide the approval to the Districts' special legal counsel within the same limits; and, Section 5.6. All claims resulting in a recommended settlement by negotiation or stipulation in an amount exceeding $25,000.00 in addition to the actual medical expenses and temporary disability payments per claimant shall be submitted to and approved by the joint Boards of Directors. Section 5.7: Resolution Nos. 93-13 and 90-89 are hereby repealed and made of no further effect. Section 5.8: This Resolution is effective immediately upon adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held 10 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 15, 1995 Agenda Item (12)(b)(7): FAHR9546 Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report prepared by staff and Moreland & Associates, Certified Public Accountants, and staff for the year ending June 30, 1995. Summary The Districts' independent auditors, Moreland &Associates, have completed their examination for 1994-95. Each year, the FAHR Committee reviews the results of the audit and the corresponding management letter. Michael Moreland, Partner and Charles Acocello, Senior Manager, will attend the meeting to respond to any questions of Directors. This year, staff has again prepared the report as a Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR), and has completely prepared the statements in-house for the first time. The CAFR will be submitted to the Government Finance Officers'Association (GFOA) for their review in anticipation of another award. Last year's CAFR, the first ever submitted by the Districts, did earn the GFOA award. The audit report will be available at the Board meeting. If you should have any questions prior to the meeting, please call Gary Streed at (714) 962-2411, ext. 2500; or Mike White, ext. 2520. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the Committee receive, approve and file the 1994-95 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report and forward it to the Executive Committee and the Joint Boards. FAHR Recommendation The FAHR Committee concurs in the stairs recommendation and requested that changes be made before final submittal to the Joint Boards for approval. Executive Committee Recommendation to the Joint Boards of Directors The Executive Committee concurs in the recommendation of the FAHR Commmittee. �ava000asuco,xowsimrcvx JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING AGENDAFOR NOVEMBER 15, 1995 Agenda Item (12)(b)(8): FPC95-13 Consideration of the following actions re Deferred Compensation Plan - Accounting for Participants' Contributions: a) Authorize the Finance Director to deposit $935,336 with Lincoln National Insurance Plan from the Joint Contingency Reserve Fund. b) Do not provide an "interest earnings" adjustment. c) Authorize the Finance Director to transfer and credit the entire value of the receivable due from the County of Orange, pursuant to the Bankruptcy settlement, the Districts' CORF and General Operating Contingency Reserve Fund and to remove the value of any such receivable from all funds other than the Reserve Funds d) Authorize the Finance Director to restore all funds except the Contingency Reserve Funds to their respective pre-bankruptcy position balances (12/5194). e) Upon receipt of proceeds from the Bankruptcy Settlement Agreements, authorize the Finance Director to deposit these proceeds to the respective CORF and General Operating Budgets Contingency Reserve Funds. Summary This issue has been before the Boards several times. It was originally raised in February 1995 but action was deferred pending the resolution of the bankruptcy proceedings. Subsequent to Governor Wilson signing the Consensus Plan Legislation, this issue was brought back to the FAHR Committee in October 1995. The FAHR Committee forwarded the staff recommendation to the October 18, 1995, Executive Committee for action. At the Executive Committee, a number of questions were raised, and the staff was requested to research these issues prior to seeking Board action. The questions which were raised were as follows: How long have the Districts' Board Members been participants in the Deferred Compensation Plan and was this an arrangement made by the staff without Board action? Since 1986, some Directors have made voluntary contributions to the plan. In 1991, after the Treasury Department issued new regulations subsequent to the passage of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990, the Districts began to contribute 7.5% as a substitute for a FICA contribution. This was done with a Board vote. If Director vote on this issue is it a Conflict-of-Interest? No. (See attached opinion) v If the Districts vote to advance funds to restore the participants' loss in the OCIP Deferred Compensation Plan, is this a gift of public funds? No. (See attached opinion) Is there a tax liability to the participants if this action is taken? Would the advance of funds be construed as income by the Internal Revenue Service? No. (See attached opinion) Attached is a response prepared by Tom Woodruff, General Counsel, which outlines the reasons why these concerns are not at issue. Briefly, the Deferred Compensation Fund has not suffered a loss. Funds owed by the County are booked as a receivable. This is also clear from the 1995 audit and management letter which is included in the October 1995 Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee agenda. The reallocation between any funds, in order to make the participants' individual book account fully liquid, places the Districts in the position of awaiting payment of the bankruptcy rather than the employees. The recommendation does not appear to have any legal impediments to its implementation. The Boards can consider the staff recommendation strictly as a policy issue. Also attached is a copy of the September 27, 1995 staff report which provides the complete background on this issue and the reasons why management is recommending this action as a fair and equitable solution. Staff Recommendation a) Authorize the Finance Director to deposit$935,336 with Lincoln National Insurance Plan from the Joint Contingency Reserve Fund. b) Do not provide an "interest earnings"adjustment. c) Authorize the Finance Director to transfer and credit the entire value of the receivable due from the County of Orange, pursuant to the Bankruptcy settlement, the Districts' CORF and General Operating Contingency Reserve Fund and to remove the value of any such receivable from all funds other than the Reserve Funds d) Authorize the Finance Director to restore all funds except the Contingency Reserve Funds to their respective pre-bankruptcy position balances (12/5/94). e) Upon receipt of proceeds from the Bankruptcy Settlement Agreements, authorize the Finance Director to deposit these proceeds to the respective CORF and General Operating Budgets Contingency Reserve Funds. Executive Committee Recommendation to the Joint Boards of Directors The Executive Committee recommends that the Joint Boards of Directors concur in the above recommendations. ,awwxasuGes 0 12M.cvn e n ' mm September 27, 1995 STAFF REPORT FPC95-13: Deferred Compensation Plan-Reimbursement of Participants' Contributions Backaround Since 1975, the Districts have had an IRS-approved Deferred Compensation Plan. All employees are eligible to participate in the plan. Currently, there are 321 active participants in the Plan. Two options were provided for the plan deposits: the Lincoln National Insurance Plan and the Orange County Commingled Investment Pool. Prior to the County bankruptcy, 67% of the participants made their deposits to the County pool. As of June 27, 1995, there are no deferred compensation participants from the Districts still in the County pool. (No contributions have been made to the County pool on behalf of Districts' employees since before December 6, 1994.) On January 5, 1995, the County Board of Supervisors established pay-out limits for all participants in the pool. The Board determined that there would be a 90% pay-out to County employees participating in the deferred compensation plan. The County provided the non- County participants with an 80% pay-out, treating them the same as the balance of the OCIP investors. The value of the CSDOC deferred compensation fund on December 6, 1994 was $4,666,679.79. On June 27, 1995, 80%was transferred to Lincoln National Insurance Plan. The remaining $933,335.96 is outstanding for the deferred compensation participants at the Districts. The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County was the only non-County group of participants whose deferred compensation plan was administered and segregated at the County at the time of the bankruptcy. This issue was discussed by the Finance and Personnel Committee in January and February 1995. Attachment No. 1 is a legal opinion which was provided to the Joint Chairman and Executive Committee on February 22, 1995, which states that while the Employer is"not responsible for any loss to the investment;there is no prohibition against the Districts voluntarily choosing to replace the loss. There was a general consensus that an effort should be made to limit or eliminate any loss to District participants. At the same time, there was a lot of uncertainty as to the status of the bankruptcy proceedings and its impact on Districts' reserves and stream of property tax revenues. The Committee asked that this matter be reconsidered when the status of the entire County pool was resolved. Now that the Orange County Consensus Plan has passed the Legislature and the Districts' financial picture is more certain, it is appropriate to bring this matter back for reconsideration and action. CSOOC 0 P.O.Box 8127 0 Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 0 Tel (714)962-2411 0 FAX(714)962d954 FPC95-13 Page 2 September 27, 1995 This issue needs to be considered in terms of employee relations, fairness, organizational efficiency and fiscal reality. Districts' participants, in good faith, deposited their deferred compensation in the pool with the expectation that these funds would be well-managed and available upon their retirement. While a significant amount, $933,335 paid out over a period of three years would be manageable. Interest earnings between December 6, 1994 and June 27, 1995 are speculative, at best. While one could make the presumption that interest earnings would have been L amount if invested at Lincoln National, it is completely hypothetical. Therefore, it would appear most straightforward to compensate for the actual cash loss and not interest earnings foregone. Given the 20% loss, participants would undoubtedly be pleased to be made whole and not expect to receive interest earnings. This type of compromise would be similar to many of the other compromises made throughout the formulation of the Bankruptcy Consensus Plan, where various parties agreed to freeze losses and not calculate present value or foregone interest. In terms of organizational efficiency, the most expeditious means of handling the pay-back would be a three-year transfer to Lincoln National in the amount of$311,111.99 per year. If funds were not transferred to Lincoln National, Districts' staff would need to maintain records and credit interest for over 30 years, including oversight for monthly pay-outs to retirees; preparation of emergency withdrawals for hardships, and processing W2Ps for reporting deferred compensation payments to the IRS. Given the fact that 80% of the participants' portfolios are already at Lincoln National, splitting the administration of the plan would be unnecessarily burdensome and confusing. It should be noted that Lincoln National administers the plan for Its participants at no cost to the Districts. During a previous Board discussion of this item, questions were asked about the relative performance of the County Pool vis-a-vis Lincoln National. Also attached are two graphs showing their respective performance from 1991 through 1994. The four-year average interest earnings were 9.38% for Lincoln National and 7.83% for the County Pool. Recommendations A. Deposit $311,119 of the loss for the next three years with Lincoln National Insurance Plan. B. Do not provide an "interest earnings' adjustment. C. Distributions from the Bankruptcy Court on behalf of the Deferred Compensation Plan will reimburse the Districts, to the extent that they are available. JAW:Ic MPFNIX¢SlSIAFr.RPM19iG .13 6/7/95 Page 1 AVERAGE INTEREST RATE COMPARISONS 20.00% 18.00% "- ----- -- - _ . _ _ _ - - ----- - _ -- - ---- -- - - -- _ ___ ____ ____'____________________________________ 16.00% _____ __________ __ _ ___ _ _ ___ _ _ __ _ _ ______________ t14.00% _________ _______________________________________________ _____________________________ 9 12.00% ____________ _______________________________________ ________ 10.00% ________________ _____________________ _ _ _______ ____________________ __________________ 8.0D% ______________________ ___------ ______________ _____________ a 8.00% _______________________ _______ _____________________________________ ____ 4.00% — - ——___________________ ____ ____________________________________________________ 2.00% — __ _ ______________________________________________________________ 0.00% 1991 1992 1m 1994 Calmdw Ywr W/95 Page 1 AVERAGE INTEREST RATE COMPARISONS 20.00% 18.00% - -- --- 16.00% ___ .___ _ - . - . _ 1<.00% __. _______ __ _ _ _ _ ___ ____ ___ _______________________________________ _____ ____ 12.00% ___ ______ ___ _ __ _ ________ ___ _________ _ 10.00% --_ ______ __ _ __________ _ ______ _____ m rn a8.00% ___ __ __ ____ ___ _ __ a __ 8.00% ___ _____ _________ ________ ______________ ____ 4.00X ___. ___ _____ ____ __ 2.00% --- --- ----- 0.00% 1991 1092 1990 1994 Calendar Year 91Llncdn ■OCIP JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS g REGULAR MEETING AGENDA FOR NOVEMBER 15, 1995 Agenda Item (12)(b)(9): EXEC95-04 Consideration of Resolution No. 95-113, approving Amendment No. 2 to Agreement between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13 and County Sanitation District No. 14 for Purchase and Sale of Capacity Rights in Treatment, Disposal and Sewer Facilities, modifying said agreement to provide for changes in the method of calculation of District No. 14's annual CORF budget and Annual Integration Adjustment, and to comply with CSDOC's reserve policy. Summary For the past several months the staff has been working with the IRWD staff to revise their 1986 agreement This issue was discussed at the September 1995 Executive Committee when the general direction of the negotiations was outlined for the Committee. it was again presented at the October 1995 Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee with updated information regarding the financial impact of the Welland Water Supply Project. If the Wetland Water Supply Project is approved, IRWD's flows to the Districts would be reduced by 5 mgd between the months of October and March. At this time,the future of this project remains uncertain. Therefore,the staff analysis has evaluated both the current situation and the Welland Water Supply Project to determine the effect of this amendment on the Districts'finances. Currently,District 14 pays forjoint works capital costs based upon a flow of 15 mgd. This rate was negotiated in 1986. At that time,IRWD projected that its flow would reach 32 mgd within the decade. This has not been the case. Their monthly flows have never exceeded 15 mgd and have exceeded ig mgd only eight times in the last three years. Their average flows have been 6.3 mgd. The proposed agreement(Attachment 1) provides that District 14 would pay based upon the actual average flow per day for the highest four months,providing capacity for higher winter flows. District 14 would come into compliance with Districts'reserve policies. Proceeds from the resultant incremental sale of District 14's share of joint works capital facilities to the other Districts will be used to satisfy reserve policy requirements,with any excess used to fund future District 14's funding requirements. Staff Recommendation Consideration of motion to approve Amendment No. 2 to Agreement between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13 and County Sanitation District No. 14 for Purchase and Sale of Capacity Rights in Treatment. Disposal and Sewer Facilities, modifying said agreement to provide for changes in the method of calculation of District No. 14's annual CORF budget and Annual Integration Adjustment, and to comply with CSDOC's reserve policy. Executive Commlltee Recommendation to the Joint Boards of Directors That the Joint Boards of Directors approve Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement with County Sanitation District No. 14. rnwno�aowAisrcva November 8, 1995 m STAFF REPORT Approve Amendment No. 2 to the "Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Capacity Rights in Treatment, Disposal and Sewer Facilities" between County Sanitation District No. 14 and the other County Sanitation Districts of Orange County mma In September 1995, the staff presented an information report to the Executive Committee regarding the status of the IRWD negotiations. Subsequently, staff learned of the IRWD Welland Water Supply Project through reports in the newspaper. A review of the EIR for the Project indicates that, if approved, the IRWD will discharge an average of 5 mgd to the duck ponds (and eventually into Upper Newport Bay)from October 21 through March 31. Removal of this flow from the CSD system will have a significant impact on each of the Districts. Because it is uncertain whether the Wetland Water Supply Project will be approved, this report includes financial data based upon historic flows as well as the financial impacts of the 5 mgd diversion to the Upper Newport Bay via the duck ponds. Backaround The 1986 Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Capacity Rights was a result of the formation of District No. 14. The Agreement allows a change in the method of calculating the District No. 14 share of capacity in the joint works treatment facilities after 1994-95, if agreeable to both parties. Current policy provides for an 'equity percentage" and amount to be calculated each year for each Districts' percentage ownership in the combined joint works treatment facilities including the interplant and ocean outfall facilities. The books and accounts are adjusted and funds are transferred from the buying to the selling Districts. With the exception of District No. 14, the equity percentage calculations are based upon the actual total annual flows for the preceding three fiscal years. The original agreement specified a District No. 14 flow of 15 million gallons per day. A specified flow was used because all of the District No. 14 flow passed through the Irvine Ranch Water District treatment and reclamation plant. Some of this flow can be diverted for agricultural uses in the summer, reducing the annual flow to our plants, but capacity is required for the higher winter months' flow. CSDOC 0 P.O.Box a127 0 Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 0 Tel. (714)962-2411 0 FAX(714)962-3954 Staff Report Page 2 November 8, 1995 The Irvine Ranch Water District, which funds all of the District No. 14 financial requirements, has asked for the 15 mgd minimum to be reconsidered. Staffs of both agencies have met several times and have agreed that a change is appropriate largely because the monthly flow has never reached a 15 mgd average, has exceeded a 10 mgd average only 8 times in the last 3 years, and the average daily flows have been 6.3 mgd. Although the annual equity adjustment and subsequent Capital Outlay Revolving Fund (CORF) budget contributions are based upon total annual flow for the other Districts, the flow for District No. 14 is based upon 15 mgd calculation. A calculation is required because the IRWD diverts flow for irrigation in the summer months. Since CSD treatment plant capacity must be based upon the maximum flow that can be reasonably expected, the very low summer flows in District No. 14 distort their fair share. As an example, the percentage change in flows for 1994-95 from the average to the highest month for District No. 14 was 244%, while the change for the other Districts was only 7%. One of the other distinctions of the District No. 14 special relationship with the IRWD relates to the CSD Reserve Policy. All of the funding needs of the District are met by IRWD when the needs arise, and most of the reserve funds have been kept and invested by IRWD. This arrangement has caused District No. 14 not to participate fully in the CSD Reserve Policy for long-term capital needs and for potential earthquake, flood damage and liability claims reserves. Staff of both agencies recognize all these differences as well as the need to be fair and equitable and to pay for facilities based upon use. Detailed below are the salient points of the proposed agreement: • The annual flow for District No. 14 will be calculated by multiplying the actual flow for the highest four months by three to determine a twelve-month flow, beginning with 1995-96. • Proceeds from the resultant incremental sale of District No. 14's share of joint works capital facilities to the other Districts will remain in the District No. 14 accounts and will be used first to satisfy reserve policy requirements, with any excess used to fund future District funding requirements. • Interest earnings on reserve funds will be allocated to District No. 14. Financial Impact of Proposed Agreement on Other Districts Attachment No. 2 to this report shows the costs to the other Districts with or without the wetlands project. The Attachment consists of two historical wastewater flow charts and two projected cash flow schedules. The wastewater flow charts show the District No. 14 monthly flows, and an average flow of the other eight Districts since July 1992. The first is the actual flow experience and the second is the flow we would have experienced if - Staff Report Page 3 November 8, 1995 IRWD had been able to divert 5 mgd to the duck ponds for the winter months. Both of these graphs show that the average monthly flow from IRWD has been well below 15 mgd, the basis for their JWTF cost contributions. The two projected cash flow schedules show the projected financial impact on the other eight Districts over the net ten years if the contribution method is changed. One schedule is with flow diversion to the duck ponds, and the other is without diversion. Both schedules are in two parts. The top half reports the share of the JWTF budget based upon the projections in the 1995-96 budget. Each District will contribute to these CORF projects based upon their three-year average flows. Since the total budget number is used and the District No. 14 share is decreased, the other Districts' shares are increased $3,477,000 over ten years without the Wetlands Project and $12,892,000 with the diversion to the Wetlands Project. The bottom half of the report shows the annual sale of JWTF equity from District No. 14 to the other Districts. Based upon projected future flows from IRWD and a 1994 John Carollo Engineers study, over the next ten years, the proposed change in District No. 14 flow calculations will result in a sale of$3,054,000 without the flow diversion to the duck ponds and $5,917,000 with the diversion. If the IRWD can consistently divert 5 mgd during the winter months, then the future capacity requirements for the CSD treatment plants could be reduced. Such a reduction would reduce future capital improvement costs and contributions from each District. However, if the flows are not consistently diverted and are sent to our treatment plants, then capacity for both average and peak flows must be provided. The costs for this additional capacity are shared by the CSD, based upon their flow-based equity percentages. Attachment No. 3 includes tables which show four scenarios: Scenario No. 1: Current State (based upon past three year's experience) Scenario No. 2: Current State with Wetlands Project (based upon past three years experience) Scenario No. 3: Wetland Water Supply Project (based Scenario No. 4: Forward Looking without Wetlands Project (based upon future flows) Staff Report Page 4 November 8, 1995 t The table for each of these scenarios summarizes the important assumptions that are behind the calculations and then reports the ten-year financial impact of each of the four possibilities. All of the scenarios are based upon the JWTF expansion schedule shown in the 1995-96 CORF budget. Changes to the capital improvement plan would change all of these scenarios. Recommendation Although the financial impact is different if the Wetlands Project is approved or if flows are constant or changing, the policy issue remains the same: IRWD should not be expected to pay 15 mgd if they are sending significantly less flow. Therefore, staff recommends the Committee approve Amendment No. 2 to the 1986 "Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Capacity Rights in Treatment, Disposal and Sewer Facilities" so that the District No. 14 annual flow is based upon the actual average flow per day for the four highest months, providing capacity for higher winter month flows. JW:GGS:lc J1WPOOCIFIN CRANEtFPC.WGTAHR.95l TAFF.RPTVRWD.AM2 Attachments Or19Natm: Gary Sft d Dept.HaJAGM: Jutly Wll 9 AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE AND SALE OF CAPACITY RIGHTS IN TREATMENT, DISPOSAL AND SEWER FACILITIES THIS AMENDMENT NO. 2 is made and entered into; to be effective this day of , 1995, by and between: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 AND 13 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, hereinafter collectively referred to as "CSDOC"; AND COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, hereinafter referred to as "14". RECITALS WHEREAS, CSDOC and 14 have entered into an agreement entitled AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE AND SALE OF CAPACITY RIGHTS IN TREATMENT, DISPOSAL AND SEWER FACILITIES, effective January 1, 1986 (the "Agreement") providing, among other things, for the acquisition by 14 from CSDOC of capacity in the JWTF (capitalized terms used herein shall have the definitions given them in the Agreement), modification of such capacity pursuant to the Annual Integration Adjustment based upon actual utilization by 14 above 15 MGD and computation of 14's share of the annual CORF budget; and WHEREAS, Section 5C of the Agreement contemplated that after fiscal year 1994-95, if 14's annual flow did not exceed 5475 MG/year (15 MGD), 14's CORF budget share might be changed by mutual agreement; and 1 Q WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 5C, the parties wish to make certain changes in the method for calculating 14's annual CORF budget share along with corresponding changes in the method for calculating 14's Annual Integration Adjustment, in order to make such calculations more consistent with the method utilized by CSDOC for all of its other Districts, and WHEREAS, the parties wish to make provision for 14's compliance with CSDOC's reserve policy. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises set forth herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: Section 1: Annual Integration Adjustment. Commencing with the annual integration adjustment made on June 30, 1996, the annual integration adjustment of 14's equity share in the JWTF and real property will be made as provided in Section 4 of the Agreement, but the annual integration adjustment will be based upon 14's CORF budget percentage computed in accordance with the revised method provided in this Amendment. This Amendment is not intended to modify the criteria for the inclusion of the value of real property in the annual integration adjustment, as set forth in Section 4A of the Agreement. Section 2: Budget Share. Section 5C of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows: "C. CORF Share After 1994-95. After fiscal year 1994-95, 14's share of the CORF shall be that percentage of the entire annual CORF budget derived by multiplying 14's actual flow for the four calendar months of the preceding fiscal year having the highest flow by three, averaging the 2 �I 9 result thereof with the result of the same calculation for the preceding two fiscal years, and dividing the resulting three-year average ('Y) by the sum of the combined total average flow of all other Districts for the preceding three fiscal years plus 'Y'. provided, that a flow of 5475 MG (15 MGD) as specified in Subsection 'A' above shall be used for each of fiscal years 1993-94 and 1994-95 in computing 14's three-year averages which include those years. Except as so provided herein with respect to the use of said 1993-94 and 1994-95 fiscal years in subsequent three-year averages as applicable, Subsections 'A' and 'B' shall not apply after fiscal year 1994-95." [SEE ATTACHMENT "A'] Section 3: Periodic Review of CORF Share. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 5C of the Agreement as amended herein, the parties hereto agree, on the request of either party, to periodically review in good faith the appropriateness of 14's CORF budget share under the circumstances then existing. A party may make such a request following the third anniversary of this Amendment and at three-year intervals thereafter. Section 4: Credits to Reduce Contributions. Annual Integration Adjustment payments shall not be refunded or paid to 14 but shall be held as a credit for the account of 14 in the books and records of CSDOC, which credit shall accrue interest actually earned from investments in accordance with the approved CSDOC Investment Policy. The credited amounts shall be applied first, to satisfy any reserve share requirements under Section 5 hereof and second, to satisfy future contributions required to be made by 14. 3 P Section 5: Reserve Requirement. It is acknowledged that the CSDOC reserves held with respect to 14 are not presently on a basis consistent with the reserves for the other Districts. The parties agree that 14's reserves shall hereafter be computed in a manner more consistent with the method approved by the CSDOC Boards of Directors to be utilized for all other Districts' reserves. 14 shall contribute to the reserve by means of a credit of its Annual Integration Adjustment payments to such reserve until 14's reserve share is funded to an amount consistent with the reserve shares of the other Districts. Except for the application of such credited amounts, 14 shall not be charged any amounts nor be required to make any contributions to fund such reserves until July, 1998. The Districts will prepare a quarterly report regarding District 14's reserve credit status for the term of this Agreement. Section 6: Agreement to Remain in Force. This Agreement, as amended hereby, shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed in duplicate in the names of the respective Districts by their duly authorized officers, effective as of the day and year first above written. "CSDOC" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA By Chairman, Board of Directors By Secretary, Board of Directors 4 P COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA By Chairman, Board of Directors By Secretary, Board of Directors COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA By Chairman, Board of Directors By Secretary, Board of Directors COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA By Chairman, Board of Directors By Secretary, Board of Directors COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA By Chairman, Board of Directors By Secretary, Board of Directors COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA By Chairman, Board of Directors By Secretary, Board of Directors 5 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA By Chairman, Board of Directors By Secretary, Board of Directors COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 13 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA By Chairman, Board of Directors By Secretary, Board of Directors "14" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA By Chairman, Board of Directors By Secretary, Board of Directors APPROVED AS TO FORM: THOMAS L. WOODRUFF, DISTRICT COUNSEL By R:INLOI85 R:1110V95 6 10/18/95 ATTACHMENT "A" ' COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Example of Annual Joint Works Equity Calculation District No. 14 With Duck Ponds For Discussion and Illustration Only.All Numbers Are Esrmales Fiscal Yr Annual Flows In Million Gel Three Year Average Flow IMG1 Per nl of 3 Year Average Esllmated Annual CORF Budget Annual JWF Eaully Ad Ending 0Is114 Other Dist Isle) Dist 14 Other Oisl I91e1 Dist 14 41hw Dist I91at Dist 14 other olal I9tet Dist 14 Other Disl 6130193 5,475 80,851 86,326 6130194 5,475 79,817 85.292 6.430% 93.570% 100.000% i 6130/95 5.475 83.213 88.688 5,475 B1,294 86,769 6.310% 93.690% 100.000% $ 1.394,128 $ 20,287,487 $ 21.081,615 $ (887.518) $ 887.518 MOM 2,438 84,360 86.798 4,463 82.463 06,926 5.134% 94.866% 100.000% 2.115,695 31.414.305 33,630,000 (6,801,786) 8,801,766 6/30197 2,577 67.235 89,612 3,497 84,936 88.433 3.954% 96.046% 100,000% 3,860,187 71,324,B13 75,185,000 (9,720.605) 9.720,605 6/30/98 3,084 -89,425 92.509 2.700 87.007 89,707 3.010% 96.990% 100.000% 2,958,291 71.851.709 74.810.000 (8,489,166) 8,489,166 6/30/99 2,759 90,885 93,644 2,B07 89,182 91,989 3.051% 96.949% f0UM% 1.803,622 58.121.378 59,925.000 399,297 (399.297) 6/30/00 3,084 92,345 95,429 2.976 90,885 93,861 3.171% 96.829% 100.000% 1.115.214 35.431,788 36.547,000 1,186,184 (1,186,184) 6/30101 3,314 93,440 98,754 3,052 92.223 95,275 3.203% 96.797% 100.000% 1,729.651 52,822,349 54,552,000 343,393 (343.393) 6130/02 3.548 94.535 95.083 3.315 93.440 96.755 3.426% 96.574% 100.000% 1.747,496 52,804,504 54,552,D00 2,460,552 (2A60,552) 6/30/03 3,775 95,630 99,408 3,547 94,535 98,082 3.616% 96.384% 100.000% 1,869,049 52,682,951 54.552,000 2,203.881 (2,203,8811 6/30/04 4,011 96,360 100,371 3,779 95,508 99,287 3.806% 96.194% 100.000% 1.972.798 52.579.202 54,552,000 2,302,699 (2,302,699) 6130105 4,241 97,090 101,331 4.010 96,360 100,370 3.995% 98A05% 100.000% 2.076,324 52.475,676 64,562,000 2,397.400 (2,397,400) 6130106 4,475 97.820 102,295 4,242 97.090 101.332 4.186% 95.814% 100.0011% 1,156,616 27,793,354 28,950,000 2.477.320 (2,477.320) 6MM7 4,705 98,550 103.255 4,474 97,820 102,294 4.374% 95.626% f00.000% 1,211.918 27.738,084 28,950,000 2,484.986 (2,454,986) 6/30/08 4,935 99,260 104,218 4,708 98,550 103,256 4.555% 95.442% 100.0D0% 1.266,177 27,683,823 28,950.000 2,491,932 (2,491,932) 6/30109 5.168 100,010 105,178 4,937 99.280 104.217 4.737% 95.263% 100.00D% 1.319,428 27.630,574 28,950,000 2,485,546 (2,485,546) 6/30110 5,402 100.740 105,142 5,169 100,010 105,179 4,914% 95.086% 10M000% 1,371,428 27,578.572 28,950,0D0 2.503.949 (2,503,9491 6130/11 5,230 101.470 108.700 5.267 100,740 108,007 4.969% 95,031% 100.000% IA22,742 27.527.258 28,950,000 779.355 (779.3 1 6130/12 5,063 102,200 107.263 5.232 101,470 108.702 4.903% 95.097% 100.000% 1.438,392 27.511,600 28.950.000 (958.2891 958,289 6130113 4,095 102.930 107.825 5.063 102,200 107,263 4.720% 95.280% 100.000% 1.419,527 27,530,473 28,950,0D0 (2,747,168) 2,747.168 6W14 4.727 103.660 100.387 4.895 102.930 107,025 4.540% 95.460% 100.000% 1,366.490 27.583,510 28.950.000 (2,757,534) 2,757,534 6/30/15 4,559 104,390 108.949 4.727 103,650 108,387 4.381% 95.639% 100.000% 1,314.262 27,635.738 28,950,000 (2,780,625) 2,780,625 61wle 4,508 105.120 109.628 4,598 104,390 108,988 4.219% 95.751% 100.000% 1,262.574 27.667,420 28.950,000 (2,259,100) 2.259.180 6/30/17 4,457 105.850 110.307 4.500 105,120 109,628 4.112% 95.888% 100.000% 1,221,346 27.728,654 28,950.000 (1,723,959) 1,723.959 6/30110 4,406 106.680 110.988 4.457 105.850 110.307 4.041% 95.959% 100.000% 1.190.450 27,759.550 28,950,000 11,176,429) 1.178,429 awn) 4.354 106.945 111.299 4,405 1D6,458 110,664 3.974% 96.026% 100.000% 1,169.737 27.780,263 28,950.00D (1,109,398) 1,109,396 BI30I20 4.300 107,576 111.975 4,353 107.067 111.420 3.907% 96.093% 100.DD0% 1,150,642 27.799,468 2B,950,000 (1,147,284) 1.147.264 $41,924,OB2 $ 966.784,533 $1,008,888,815 $(20,042,425) $ 20,042,425 IRWD_EOx.xLS 4:36 PM 10/31/95 Estimated Cost to Change District 14 Annual CORF Contribution From 15MGD to Highest 4 Months IRWD Flows Reduced for 5 mad to Creek From Nov Thru March CSD and IRWD Flows Assumed to Remain in Current Ratios IRWD CONTRIBUTION Yr Ended 15 MGD Net Hi 4 Month Cost to CSD No Bat) Equity% 94-95% Other Dists 1 2 3 5 6 7 11 13 Total 1996 2,116,D00 972,000 1,144,000 120,055 359.341 371,829 44,063 67,259 102.601 77,170 11,782 1,144.000 1997 4,737,000 2,180,000 2,557,000 268,340 803,177 831,091 98,488 127,982 229.103 172,486 26,334 2,557.000 1998 4,713,000 2.169,000 2,544,000 266,976 799,094 826,865 97,987 127,331 227,938 171,609 26.200 2,544,000 1999 3.775.000 1,738.000 2,037,000 213.770 639,840 662,077 78,459 101,955 182,512 137,408 20,978 2,037,000 2000 2,302.000 1,060,000 1,242,000 130.340 390,124 403,682 47,838 62,164 111.281 83,781 12,791 1,242,WO 2001 3.437,000 1.582.000 1,855.000 194,670 582,673 602.923 71,449 92,846 166.205 125,131 19,104 1.855,000 2002 3.437,000 1,582,000 1.855.000 194.670 562,673 602.923 71,449 92,846 166.205 125,131 19,104 1,855,000 2003 3.437,000 1,582,000 1,855.000 194.670 582,673 602,923 71.449 92,846 166,205 125,131 19,104 1,855.000 2004 3.437.000 1,582,000 1,855,ODD 194.670 582,673 602,923 71,449 92,846 166,206 125.131 19,104 1,855,000 2005 3A37,000 1.582.000 1,855,000 194.670 582,673 602,923 71,449 92.846 166,205 125,131 19,104 1,855,000 Total 34,828,000 16,029,D00 18,799.000 1.972.830 5,904,938 6,110,159 724,081 940.918 1,684,359 1.268,110 193,606 18,799,D00 One Time Equity Adjustment 1995 (888,000) (24.710,000) 23,822,000 2,499,961 7,482,709 7,742,763 917,552 1,192,327 2,134,412 1,606,942 245.335 23,822,000 IRWD FLB.XLS 9:05 PM 10/31/95 Estimated Cost to Change District 14 Annual CORF Contribution From 15MGD to H'ohe5t 4.Mo11105 CSD and IRWD Flows Assumed to Remain in Current Ratios IRWD CONTRIBUTION Vr Ended 15 MGD Hl4 Month Coat to CSD No Sm Equity% 94-95% Other Dists 1 2 3 5 6 7 11 13 Total 1996 2.116,000 1,636,000 580,000 60,845 182,291 188,552 22,308 29.055 51,909 39,084 6,957 580,000 1997 4.737,000 3.443,000 1,294.000 136.747 406,697 420,605 49,769 64,822 115.812 87,198 13,290 1.294,000 1998 4,713,000 3,426,000 1,287,000 135,012 404,497 418,390 49,500 64,471 115.185 86,726 13,218 1.287,000 1999 3,775.000 2.745,000 1,030,000 108.052 323,724 334,842 39,615 51,597 92,184 69,408 10,578 1,030,000 2000 2,302,000 1.674,000 628,000 65,880 197,377 204,156 24,154 31,459 56,205 42.319 6,460 628,000 2001 3,437,000 2,498,000 939.000 98,505 295,123 306,259 38,115 47,039 84,040 63,276 9.644 939.000 2002 3,437,000 2.498,000 939,000 98.505 295,123 306.259 38,115 47,039 84.040 63,276 9,e44 939,000 2003 3,437,000 2,498,000 939,000 98,505 295,123 305,259 36,115 47.039 64.040 63.276 9,644 939,000 20D4 3,437,000 2,498,000 939,000 98.505 295,123 305,269 38,115 47,039 84,040 63.276 9,644 939,000 2005 3,437,000 2,498,000 939.000 98,505 295,123 305,259 36,115 47.039 84,040 63,276 9,644 939.000 Total 34,828.000 25,314,000 9,514,000 998,063 2,990.200 3,092.898 365,923 476.597 851.494 641,113 97,712 9,514,000 One Time Equity Adjustment 1995 (888,000) (12,950,000) 12,062,ODO 1,265,360 3,791,023 3,921.224 463,923 604,238 1,079.538 812,813 123,881 12,062,000 IRWD FL4.XLS 9:08 PM 10/31/95 Estimated Cost to Change District 14 Annual CORF Contribution From 15MGD to Highest 4 Months IRWD Flows NOT Adiusted for Wetlands Prolect FUTURE FLOWS INCREASED PER 1994 CSD ENGINEERING REPORT AND IRWD ESTIMATES IRWD CONTRIBUTION Yr Ended 15 MGD Hi 4 Month Cost to CSD No 6/30 Equity% Annual Eq% Other Disls 1 2 3 5 6 7 11 13 Total 1996 2,084,000 1,973.000 111.000 11,649 34,866 36,078 4,275 5.556 9,945 7,488 1,143 111,000 1997 4,678,000 4,141,000 437,000 45.860 137,266 142,036 16,832 21,873 39,154 29,478 4,601 437,000 1998 4,459,000 3.842,000 617,000 64,750 193,805 200,541 23,765 30,882 55,282 41,620 6,354 617,000 1999 3,491,000 3,071.000 426,000 44,706 133.811 138,461 16.408 21.322 38,169 28.736 4.387 426,000 2000 2,105,000 1,852,000 253,000 26,551 79,470 82,232 9,745 12,663 22,668 17,066 2,006 253,000 2001 3,105,000 2,743.000 362,000 37.989 113.708 117,659 13,943 18,119 32.435 24,419 3,728 362,000 2002 3,071,000 2.713.000 358,000 37,570 112,451 116,359 13,789 17.918 32,076 24,149 3,687 358.000 2003 3.019,000 2,689,000 330.000 34,631 103,656 107,258 12,711 16,517 29,567 22.281 3,399 330,000 2004 2.969.000 2,665,000 304.000 31,903 95,489 98.808 11,709 15.216 27.238 20,507 3,131 304,000 2005 2,920,000 2,641,000 279,000 29.279 87,636 90,682 10,746 13,964 24,990 18.820 2,873 279,000 Total 31,807,000 28,330.000 3,477,000 364.888 1,092,158 1,130.115 133,924 174,029 311,533 234,545 35,808 3,477,000 Annual JWTF Equity Adjustment 1996 (670.000) (2,979,000) 2.309,000 242,314 725,278 750.484 88,936 115,569 206,883 155,756 23,780 2,309,000 1997 (977.000) (2,922,000) 1.945.000 204,115 610.942 832,175 74,916 97,350 174,269 131,202 20,031 1.945,000 1998 (1,096,000) (3,160.000) 2.064.000 216,603 648,321 670.853 79,499 103,306 184,931 139,230 21,256 2.064,000 1999 (1,130,000) (99,000) (1,031,000) (108,197) (323,847) (336.102) (39.711) (51.603) (92.376) (69,547) (10,618) (1,031.000) 2000 (709,000) (554,000) (155,000) (16,266) (48,687) (50,379) (5,970) (7,758) (13,888) (10.456) (1,696) (155,00(1) 2001 (61M.000) (375.000) (311,000) (32,637) (97,688) (101,083) (11.979) (15.566) (27,865) (20,979) (3203) (311,000) 2002 (668,000) (578,000) (90,000) (9,445) (28.270) (29,252) (3,467) (4,505) (8,064) (6,071) (927) (90,000) 2003 (1,043,000) (500,000) (543.000) (56,984) (170,661) (176,489) (20,915) (27,178) (48.652) (36,629) (5,592) (543,000) 2004 (1,074,000) (515,000) (559,000) (58.663) (175,587) (181,689) (21.531) (27,979) (50,085) (37.708) (5,757) (559,000) 2005 (1,104,000) (529,000) (575,000) (60.342) (180,613) (186,890) (22,147) (28.780) (51,519) (38,787) (5,922) (575.000) Total (9,157,000) (12,211,00(3) 3,054,000 320,497 959.289 992,629 117.631 152.857 273,633 206.011 31.462 3,054.000 IRWD FLB.XLS 8:52 PM 10/31195 Estimated Cost to Change District 14 Annual CORF Contribution From 15MGD to Highest 4 Months IRWD Flows Reduced for 5 mad to Creek From Nov Thm March FUTURE FLOWS INCREASED PER 1994 CSD ENGINEERING REPORT AND IRWD ESTIMATES IRWD CONTRIBUTION Yr Ended 15 MGD Hi 4 Month Cost to CSD No 6130 Equity% Annual Eq% Other Diets 1 2 3 5 6 7 11 13 Total 1996 2,084,000 1,699,000 385,000 40.403 120,932 125,135 14,829 19,270 34,495 25,971 3,965 385,000 1997 4,578,000 2,925,000 1.653.000 173.471 519,222 537,268 63,669 82,735 148,106 111,605 17,024 1,653,000 1998 4,459,000 2,038,000 2.421,000 254.068 760,458 786.887 93,250 121,175 216,918 163,312 24,933 2,421.000 1999 3.497.000 1,660,000 1.837.000 192.781 577,019 597,072 7D,756 91,945 164.592 123,917 18.919 1,837,000 2000 2.105,000 1,051,000 1,054,000 110,610 331.071 342,577 40,597 52,754 94.437 71,099 10,865 1,054,000 2001 3,105,000 1.686.000 1,419,000 148.915 445,721 461,212 54,656 71,023 127,140 95,720 14,814 1,419,000 2002 3,071,000 1,804,000 1,267,000 132,963 397.976 411.808 48,801 63,415 113.521 85,467 13,048 1,267,000 2003 3,019,000 1,912,000 1.107,000 116,172 347.719 359,804 42,630 55,407 99,165 74,674 11,401 1.107,000 2004 2,969,000 2,018,000 951,0D0 99,601 298,718 309,099 36,630 47.599 85,208 64,151 9,794 951.000 2005 2,920,000 2,122.000 798,000 83,745 250,659 259,371 30,737 39,941 71,499 53,830 8.218 798,000 Total 31,807,000 18,915,000 12,892,000 1,352,930 4,049.496 4.190.232 496.561 646,264 1,156,102 869,646 132.770 12,892.000 Annual JW rF Equity Adjustment 1996 (670,000) (8,699,000) 8,029,000 842.590 2.621,982 2,609.632 309.253 401,863 719,385 541,606 82,688 8.029,000 1997 (977,000) (9,112,00(1) 8,135,000 853.714 2.555,278 2,644,084 313.336 407,169 728,883 548,756 63,780 8,135,000 1998 (1,096.000) (9,894,DD0) 8,798,000 923,292 2.763.532 2,859,577 338,873 440,353 788,286 503,480 90,608 8,798.000 1999 (1,130,000) 417.000 (1,547.000) (162,347) (485.927) (502,815) (69.686) (77,430) (138,609) (104,355) (16,932) (1,547,000) 2000 (709.000) 980,000 (1,699.000) (178,299) (533.671) (552,219) (65,440) (85,037) (152,228) (114,608) (17,497) (1,699,000) 2001 (686,000) 2,159,000 (2,845,001)) (298,564) (893,641) (924,698) (109,581) (142.396) (254,907) (191,913) (29.300) (2,846,000) 2002 (668,00D) 2,282,000 (2,950,000) (309,583) (926,622) (958,826) (113,625) (147,652) (264,315) (198,996) (30,381) (2,950,000) 2003 (1,043,000) 2,197,DD0 (3,240,000) (340,018) (1,017.714) (1,053,083) (124,795) (162,167) (290.299) (218,558) (33,368) (3,240,000) 2004 (1,074,D00) 2,262.000 (3,336,000) (350,091) (1,047.868) (1,084,286) (128,493) (166,972) (298.900) (226.034) (34,356) (3,336.000) 2005 (1,104,000) 2,324,000 (3,428,000) (359,746) (1,076,760) (1,114,188) (132,036) (171,577) (307,143) (231,240) (35,304) (3,428,000) Total (9,157,000) (15,074,000) 5,917,000 620,950 1,858,584 1.923,177 227,905 296,155 530,153 399,139 60.937 5,917,000 IRWD FLA.XLS 8:47 PM Estimated Financial Impacts of Changing the District 14 Joint Equity Calculation Scenario 1 Current State (Based Upon Past 3 Years' Experience) Assumptions: Capital Costs Based Upon 2020 Vision Masterplan IRWD Annual Flow Calculated as 3 Times the Highest 4 Months Flow Future Flows Remain Constant at the Actual Average Levels for the Past Three Years For IRWD For CSD No Growth or Other Changes In Demographics Have Been Included Estimates Are For A 10 Year Planning Horizon Only Financial Imoactsi IRWD CONTRIBUTION OTHER CSD 15 MGD High 4 Mo Increased Contributions Annual CORF Needs 34,828,000 25,314,000 9,514,000 Annual Equity Adjustment (888,000) (12,950,000) 12,062,000 Total 10 Year Impact 33,940,000 12,364,000 21,576,000 IRWD Sum.xls 10/11/95 Estimated Financial Impacts of Changing the District 14 Joint Equity Calculation Scenario 2 Current State with Wetlands Project (Based Upon Past 3 Years' Experience) Assumptions: Capital Costs Based Upon 2020 Vision Masterplan IRWD Annual Flow Calculated as 3 Times the Highest 4 Months Flow IRWD November Thru March Flows Of 5 mgd Sent To Wetlands Project Future Flows Remain Constant at the Actual Average Levels for the Past Three Years For IRWD For CSD No Growth or Other Changes In Demographics Have Been Included Estimates Are For A 10 Year Planning Horizon Only Financial Impacts: IRWD CONTRIBUTION OTHER CSD 15 MGD High 4 Mo Increased Contributions Annual CORF Needs 34,828,000 16,029,000 18,799,000 Annual Equity Adjustment (888,000) (24,710,000) 23,822,000 Total 10 Year Impact 33,940,000 (8,681,000) 42,621,000 it d_sum.xls 10/11/95 J Estimated Financial Impacts of Changing the District 14 Joint Equity Calculation Scenario 3 Wetland Water Supply Project (Based Upon Projected Future Flows ) Assumptions: Capital Costs Based Upon 2020 Vision Masterplan - IRWD Annual Flow Calculated as 3 Times the Highest 4 Months Flow IRWD November Thru March Flows Of 5 mgd Sent To Wetlands Project Future Flows Are Projected To Increase For Both IRWD and Other CSDs For IRWD Based Upon Data Supplied By IRWD (15mgd @ 2005) For CSD Based Upon 1994 Flow Study By JCE (285mgd @ 2006) Estimates Are For A 10 Year Planning Horizon Only Financial Impacts: IRWD CONTRIBUTION OTHER CSD 15 MGD High 4 Mo Increased Contributions Annual CORF Needs 31,807,000 18,915,000 12,892,000 Annual Equity Adjustment (9,157,000) (15,074,000) 5,917,000 Total 10 Year Impact 22,650,000 3,841,000 18,809,000 IRWD Sum.xls tol11195 Estimated Financial Impacts of Changing the District 14 Joint Equity Calculation Scenario 4 Forward Looking Without Wetlands Project (Based Upon Projected Future Flows) Assumptions: Capital Costs Based Upon 2020 Vision Masterplan IRWD Annual Flow Calculated as 3 Times the Highest 4 Months Flow No IRWD Flows Sent To Wetlands Project Future Flows Are Projected To Increase For Both IRWD and Other CSDs For IRWD Based Upon Data Supplied By IRWD (15mgd @ 2005) For CSD Based Upon 1994 Flow Study By JCE (285mgd @ 2005) Estimates Are For A 10 Year Planning Horizon Only Financial Impacts: IRWD CONTRIBUTION OTHER CSD 15 MGD High 4 Mo Increased Contributions Annual CORF Needs 31,807,000 28,330,000 3,477,000 Annual Equity Adjustment (9,157,000) (12,211,000) 3,054,000 Total 10 Year Impact 22,650,000 16,119,000 6,531,000 IRWD_surnAs 10/11/95 a JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING AGENDA NOVEMBER 15, 1995 Agenda Item (13): Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the staff Summary Financial Report for the three- month period ending September 30, 1995. Summary Attached are the budgetary financial statements for the first quarter of the fiscal year. The Joint Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Budget statements were reviewed by the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee on November 8, 1995. If any Director has questions pertaining to the statements, please call Gary Streed, Director of Finance, at (714) 962-2411, ext. 2500. With one quarter of the year gone, 22% of the net joint operating budget has been expended. Net costs are up $1,765,093 or 17.12%, compared with the same period last year. This is primarily due to salaries and wages, a decrease in labor charged to CORF projects, a change in the sulfide control program, and increased biosolids hauling costs. Small increases and decreases in other categories make up the balance. At the same time, flows have increased less than 1%, resulting in an $80.65 per million gallons increase in the unit cost to treat and dispose of sewage, to $553.64 per million gallons, $73.66 below the approved budget. Joint Works construction projects for the first three months are lower than originally scheduled, running at 6% of the 1995-96 budget or$1.9 million. We continue to receive excellent bids on new projects, reflecting the slow economy. Several projects have recently been awarded and progress payments on these projects will increase CORF outlay over the remainder of the year. Recommendation: That the Joint Boards of Directors receive, file and approve the Summary Financial Report for the three-month period ending September 30, 1995. -rmwo 13- D v November 15, 1995 4' Joint Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14 of Orange County, Cal'Ifomia Subject: Summary Financial Report for Three Months Ended September 30, 1995 Transmitted herewith is the Summary Financial Report for three months ended September 30, 1995. The statements summarize the fiscal activities of the joint operations and the individual Districts through the third quarter of the 1995-96 fiscal year and the status of each with respect to the approved budgets. The combined 1995-96 budget for all Districts is $461.7 million, of which approximately 23% is for capital expenditures for facilities improvements and additions, including reserves for said capital projects. The total budgeted revenue and expense categories of the several Districts are set forth below. TABLE COMPARATIVE BUDGET SUMMARY (MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) Increase 1984-95 REQUIREMENTS 1994-95• 1995-96• Decease %of Budget JOINT TREATMENT WORKS 0,M&R $ 49.5 E 54A E 4.9 11.8% COLLECTION SYSTEM&OTHER DISTRICT 0,M&R 9.5 9.6 0.1 2.1% TREATMENT PLANT CONSTRUCTION APPROPRIATIONS 67.8 35.5 (32.3) 7.7& DISTRICT SEWER CONSTRUCTION APPROPRIATIONS 18.8 134 (5A) 29% DEBT ISSUE&SERVICE(G.O.&C.O.P.) 39.8 346 (5.2) 7.5% SUB-TOTAL $185.4 $1425 $ 3( 7.9) 32�.09 CONSTRUCTION RESERVES $110.0 $ 55.0 $ (55.0) 11.9% OTHER RESERVES 3831 2532 (123,91 56,1% SUB-TOTAL $493.1 $314.2 $ 1( 78.9) 66.0% TOTAL REQUIREMENTS $678.5 % 1.7 $(216.81 100.0% FUNDING CARRY-OVER $ 66.1 $ 23.6 $ (425) 5.1% APPROPRIATED RESERVES 3643 W9.3 (60.0) 67.0% SUB-TOTAL $435A $332.9 $ 102.6 72.1% TAX ALLOCATION $ 31.1 $ 31.1 $ 0.0 0.7% FEES 92.7 01.3 (11.4) 17.8% BORROWING 84.5 - (84.5) Q0% INTEREST&OTHER 34.8 16.4 1( A) 3.0% SUB-TOTAL $243.1 $128.8 $ 1( 14.3) TOTAL FUNDING $678.5 E46®.7 $ 2( 16.81 100.0% -ADJUSTED FOR INTER-DISTRICT TRANSACTIONS. CSDOC 0 P.O.Box 8127 0 Faunteln Velley,CA 92728.8127 0 Tel. (714)962-2411 0 FAX(714)962-3954 Summary Financial Report a Page 2 November 15, 1995 Included in each District's statement is a summary of the above major income and expense categories and an itemization of their trunk sewer construction projects and respective share of the joint works expansion. Authorized general reserves and inter-fund transfers have been excluded from the budget column on said statements as expenditures are not charged directly against such appropriations. Summarized below are comments relative to the financial statements. The statements are presented on an accrual basis and, therefore, inter-district cash transactions for fiscal 1995-96 which were accrued in 1994-95 are not reflected in the year-to-date balances. CASH AND INVESTMENTS As of September 30, 1995, the Districts' treasury was comprised as follows: 7H� £]1NDSj: Checking Account $ 601.1 Money Market 117.3 Local Agency Investment Fund (L.A.I.F.) 17,108.2 PIMCO (Short-term) 60,000.0 PIMCO (Long-tens) 233,100.0 Total $310.926.6 Additionally, $30.8 million, representing debt service reserves, is held by trustees for the various issues. JOINT OPERATING The Joint Operating fund accounts for operations, maintenance, and administrative activities relative to the Districts'jointly-owned treatment and disposal facilities. The JO expenditures along with the self-funded insurance program costs are monitored by the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee and if some unexpected expenditures are experienced, they are reviewed by the Committee. Salaries and Wades-Approximately 12%of authorized positions were unfilled during the quarter and, thus, some minor payroll savings have been realized to date as expenses are 21.79% of the budget. These positions will not be filled until necessary, but the vacancy rate is expected to decline in the balance of the year. Employees' Benefits-Includes Retirement, Workers' Compensation, Unemployment Insurance, Group Medical Insurance and Uniforms. Summary Financial Report Page 3 November 15, 1995 Chamebacks to Districts and CORF- Payroll expenses are charged back to CORF through the cost accounting system for work on the treatment plants' capital expansion program, and to individual Districts for work on Districts' collection facilities capital expansion projects as well as maintenance and repair of said systems. Source Control Division charges to respective Districts are also included in these chargebacks. The decrease in this category reflects our reduced capital improvement program for 1995-96. Gasoline. Oil & Fuel - Includes all fuel for motor pool. A large portion is recovered through our equipment billing system and included in revenue below. Insurance - Budget amount includes Board and staff out-of-county travel policy, employee fidelity, boiler, fire, earthquake and all risk insurance policies, and pro-rata cost of the self- funded liability insurance program. Expense is in line with increased annual budget. Memberships- Includes the cost of membership in CASA, AMSA, SARFPA, WateReuse and other organizations. Annual membership costs are recorded when paid. Office Expense -This account includes various types of office supplies, postage, stationery, computer supplies and related items. Odor Control Chemicals - Primarily for influent and sludge odor control at treatment plant sites. The main chemicals used to control odors are hydrogen peroxide and ferrous chloride. Ferric chloride is used as a supplemental odor control chemical, and caustic soda is also used in air scrubbers throughout the plants to reduce hydrogen sulfide emissions. Use of chlorine has essentially been eliminated at the plants. Chemical Coagulants- Expenditures for this item are required to dewater our sludges prior to disposal to comply with Regional Water Quality Control Board requirements. Other Operating Supplies - Miscellaneous items such as solvents, cleaners,janitorial, tools, lab chemicals, etc., purchased throughout the year. Contractual Services -The major elements in this line item are payment for grit removal and disposal and payment for removal and off-site beneficial reuse of biosolids or sludge. These expenses which are a significant part of our total costs are right at the budget projections. Professional Services- Primarily consists of General Counsel's fees, other legal services, audit fees, and miscellaneous consulting services. The decrease from 1994-95 reflects the Ernst&Young costs of that year. Printing and Publications- Includes all reproduction activities in-house, including copier rental, and with outside services and recruitment advertising. Summary Financial Report , Page 4 November 15, 1995 Equipment Rental Outside Equipment Rental- Primarily for the rental of large cranes and equipment necessary for removing and replacing major pumps, engines and other large equipment during the course of maintenance and repair operations. CSDOC Equipment Rental - Reflects the charges for District-owned equipment used for overhead type activities. All equipment use is charged to the appropriate work order and fund through the cost accounting system. Repairs and Maintenance-This item includes parts and supplies for repair of plant facilities. Escalating costs continue to have an impact on this item. Generally, this account runs dose to budget by year-end due to the unpredictability of major equipment failures. Research and Monitoring - Budget includes funds for the ocean monitoring contract required by our NPDES permit. Other projects include operational research and evaluation of processes to develop optimum operating parameters, and also include the Districts' annual share of participation in the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project. Travel. Meetings &Training - Major items are authorized by specific Board actions. Expanding activities of regulatory agencies and the Clean Water Act reauthorization have required additional staff and Board travel. Increased training is a focal point of this year's budget and our annual goals. These costs are reviewed separately by the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee. Utilities-The major item in the Utilities Expense Account is for natural gas purchased for central power generation. Some power is still purchased for parts of the plants not served by central generation. Total utilities expenses are in line with the budget, and are down $330,877 from last year. Other Expenses -For items not chargeable elsewhere such as freight, safety supplies, grounds maintenance supplies, etc. Prior Year's Expense-This account is required by the Uniform Accounting System and represents adjustments to an operating or non-operating account balance from the previous year or payment of charges which could not be accrued at year end. Generally, all expenses to this account are recorded in the first quarter. Allocation to Districts and CORE-This is an account established in connection with the cost accounting system and represents materials, supplies and services, overhead chargebacks to the individual Districts and CORF. CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND This fund accounts for the costs of expanding and improving the Districts'jointly-owned treatment and disposal facilities and represents an average of 22% (excluding reserves) of each Districts' budget requirements for 1995-96. During the first quarter, $1.9 million was Summary Financial Report Page 5 November 15, 1995 expended on joint works treatment and disposal facilities improvement and expansion projects. The 1995-96 budget is $33.5 million. The pro-rate share of joint works improvements and expansion costs is reflected in the financial statements of the respective Districts. INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS -The statements reflect the accounting transactions for the nine Districts and include each respective District's share of the Joint Operating Fund and the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund. Taxes: Tax revenue is allocated to two separate accounts: Tax Allocation -This account represents the anticipated allocation of the Districts' pro- rate share of the maximum 1% basic property tax allowed under Proposition 13. Amounts received in the first quarter are essentially late payments from last year. Tax Levy -This account represents tax funds necessary to make voter-approved outstanding general obligation bond principal and interest payments. In accordance with the Jarvis-Gann inifiative, tax levies to safisfy these obligations are not restricted. Only District 11 has a 1995-96 tax levy for bond service. Federal and State Construction Grants - EPA and SWRCB have historically funded up to 87'/2% of treatment plant construction for approved projects. All outstanding grant funds have been received and no new grants or SRF loans are budgeted. Fees -All Districts now have an adopted, uniform sewer connection fee schedule. This account also reflects industrial waste user charges levied by seven of the nine Districts pursuant to the Uniform Industrial Waste Ordinance and the Revenue Program, and the user fees implemented in Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13. Annexation fee revenue is unpredictable and, thus, is not included in the budgets unless there is an existing agreement providing for payment of fees. Sale of Capacity Rights -This account records income from sale of capacity rights to outside agencies such as SAWPA, including the capital replacement charge. SAWPA has been invoiced for an additional capacity purchase, but the charges are being negotiated and have not been paid. Other- Includes the annual joint facilities interdistrict equity adjustment required by the recalculation of the respective ownership percentages. Cost of this adjustment for purchasing Districts is included in each District's Share of Joint Works Construction. Share of Joint Works Construction - Represents each District's share of joint treatment and disposal facilities expansion discussed above under Capital Outlay Revolving Fund (CORF), and the purchase of joint facilities interdistrict equity when appropriate. Summary Financial Report , Page 6 November 15, 1995 Bond Retirement and Interest Expense- Payment of principal and interest on outstanding general obligation bonds and certificates of participation of the respective Districts. Annual budgeted expense for all Districts is approximately $36 million. Share of Joint Operating - Represents each District's share of operating and maintaining the jointly-owned treatment and disposal facilities, and administrative activities. Costs are distributed based upon each Distrids respective gallonage flow(see Joint Operating Fund statement for details). District Operating and Other Expenditures-Consists primarily of individual Districts' general operating expenses, industrial monitoring, operations, maintenance and repair of the respective Districts' collection systems. DD:GGS:lc J1 PDOQflMCRPNBI nY.RP EKf .W Attachments COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY SUMMARY JOINT OPERATINGAVORX/NG CAPITAL FUND BUDGET REVIEW 3 MONTNS ENDED 9M"5 APPROVED BUDGET YEAR-TO-DATE UNEXPENDED YEAR-TO-DATE III EXPENDITURES BUDGET %EXPENDED SALARIES.WAGES 8 BENEFITS Salaries&Wagos 32,283,00 71035284 25.247,736 21.79% Payroll Benefits 7,6841000 1,844,831 6.039,369 21A0% TOTAL PAYROLL 39.%7,000 8,679.8M 31,287,105 21.72% Lose: Clham.. bto Dots&CORF (11.300,0(0) (1,151,243) (10,118,757) 10A5% NET JOINT OPERATING PAYROLL 2ESE7,00 7,488,652 21,168.348 26.16% MATERIALS.SUPPLIES&SERVICES Gaso11n0,Oil& Diesel 175.000 29,353 145,647 16.77% Muranca 1250.00 363,707 $86.293 29.10% Memberships 58,000 28,40 29,600 0.97% Office Expense 482,90 76,833 386.267 10.55% Chlorine&Odor Conbol 3.618.50 491,868 3,326,834 12.88% Chemical Coagulants 1,545,00 241.798 1,303.202 15.65% OUIer Operating Supplies 907,900 181 798.730 19.15% Contractual Services 7269,50 1,0 1,781 5.637,719 22.45% Pr0fess10nsl Services 1,512,60 321,803 I.190,797 4.43% Printing&Publlcagon 341,800 42.712 299,085 12.50% Equipment Randal 235,700 56.936 178.764 24.16% Repair&Maintenance 4,2M.M 8I.= 3.368,872 19.98% Rosoarch&Moaltcring 3.095,00 336.480 2,756.520 1OJX% Travel,Moe0ng&Tmining 647,500 0253 557,247 13.W% Unc.11.11bla Aacoanls 15,00 131 14,869 0,57% UWluad 3,375,500 667.467 2.808.033 16.81% OINer Expenses 868,700 115,846 749,854 13.68% Prior Years Expense 20,00 0 20.000 0.0% Non O"mUng Expense 94,50 14,807 79,663 15.70% TOTAL MATERIALS&SERVICES 29.963,0D0 5,445,201 24,537,799 1a.18% Loos: Allocation to Dieu B COW (470,000) (128,130) (341,870) 27.28% NET JOINT OPER MATERIALS B SERVICES 29,513,000 5,317.071 24,195,929 18.02% TOTAL JOI NT OPERATING EXPENSES SW,180,00 12.815.723 45.364,277 22A3% REVENUES Revenues (3,800,000) (742.099) (3.057,901) 19.53% NET JOI NT OPERATING REVENUES (3,90,000) (742.099) (3,057,901) 19.53% NET JOINT OPERATING EXPENSES 54,3110,00 12.073,624 42,306,376 22.20% GALLONAGE DATA M.G.FLOW CHARGES DISTRICT BUDGET TO DATE BUDGET TO DATE 1 2,157 2.321 1.352.760 1,26g943 2 7.023 6,935 4.404,7W 3,839.428 3 6.603 (I'm 4,141,00 3,636.419 5 00 879 501,750 488.644 6 1,035 823 649.750 455.067 7 1,855 2.136 1,1113,70 1.181,828 11 1.359 1.616 871,50 894,82] 13 230 231 1N,00 127,6W 14 562 301 385.70 186.950 21.672 21.808 13.595.00 12.073.623 County Sanitation District No. i-14 Summary Quarterly Financial Report 3 Months Ended 2410,95 Budget Review 1996-96 Remaining Year-to-Date Budget Yeardo-Date Budget %Expended REVENUFS Tax Levy(Bond Fondle)Only) 17,OOD 1,863 15.137 10.96% Tax Allocatlone/Subventions(Sham of l%) 31,146,000 1,644,859 29,501.141 5.28% Federal and Stale Constructlon Grants 0 0 0 0.00% Conneedon Fees 4,748,000 1.419.128 3.328,872 29.89% IRWD Fees 9,100.000 0 9,100.000 0.00% Other Fees 67,511,000 666,291 66,844,709 0.99% Sale of Capacity Rights 644,000 5.883 638,117 0.91% Interest B Misc.Receipts 16,799,000 5,866.825 9.932,175 37.13% Other 2,000 0 2.000 0.00% Total Revenues 128,967,000 9,604,849 119,362,151 7A5% OUTLAYS: Sham of Joint Works Tnnt Plant 8 Reserves 33,530,000 2.309.231 31,220,769 6.89% District Trunk Sewer Constr.B Reserves 13.420,000 1,642,008 ll.777,992 12.24% COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 67,951,000 4,985,398 62,955,602 7.34% Sham of Joint Works Operating Expenses 54,380,000 12,073,623 42,306.377 22.20% District Operatlng S Other Expenditures 9,592,OOD 3,153,719 6.438.281 32.88% Total Outlays 178,873,000 24,163,979 154,709,021 13.51% Facilities Expansion Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance 711/95 SAdditions Fixed Assets 9130195 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Districts 1.14 Construction in Progress 22,693,603 1,642,008 0 24,335,611 Share of Joint Works 54,743,611 2,309.231 0 67,052,842 Sub-Total 77,437,215 3,961,239 0 81,388,454 FQ�LETED PROPERTY PLANT 8 EQUIP: Land and Property Rights 2,645,921 0 2.645,921 Collection Lines and Pump Sms. 277,817,D24 4 0 277,817,028 Treatment Facilites 19,922 0 19.922 Disposal Facilities 101,528 0 101.528 General Plant and Admin.Facil. 855.176 0 855.176 Equity in Joint Treatment Facll. 692,378,501 (178.842) 0 692.199,659 Other Assets at Cost Loss Amort 91,868 (16,622) 0 75,246 Sub-Total 973,209,940 (195,460) 0 973,714,480 Total Property,Plant B Equipment 8 CIP 1,061,347,156 3,755.71`9 0 1,055,102,934 Comfy Sanitation District No. 1 Summary quarterly Financial Report 3 Morms Ended 91J0/9S Budget Review 1995-96 Remaining year-1 Dxto Budget year-to-Date Budget %Expended REVENUES: Tax levy(Bond Fund(s)Only) 0 0 0 0.00% Tax Allocations/Subventions(Sham of l%) 2.105.000 96,963 2.008,037 4.61% Federal and State Construction Game 0 0 0 0.00% Connection Fees 71,000 2,350 68,650 3.31% Other Foos 6,447,000 60,110 6,386,890 0.93% Sale of Capacity Rights 63,000 1,099 61,901 1.74% Imerest&Misc.Receipts 925.000 534,474 390,520 57.78% Other 0 0 0 0.00% Total Revenues 9,611,000 694,996 8,916,004 7.23% OUTLAYS: Sham of Joint Works Tnmt Plant 3,279,000 228,091 3,060,000 6.96% District Trunk Sewer Construction 75.000 0 75,000 0.00% COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 8,679.000 655,850 8,023.150 7.66% Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 5,411,D00 1,284,943 4,128,057 23.75% District Operating&Other Expenditures 587.000 99.405 467,695 16.93% Total Outlays 18.031,000 2.268,289 16,762,711 12.68% Facilities Expansion Balance Adjustments Trensferlo Balance 711195 &Additions Fixed Assets 9/30196 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: District No.1 Projects 0 0 0 Sub-Total 0 0 0 0 Share of Joint Works 5,380,203 228.091 0 5,608,294 Sub-Total 5,380,203 228,091 0 6.608,294 COMPLETED PROPERTY.PLANT 8 EQUIP. Land and Property Rights 81.398 81,398 Collection Lines and Pump Stns. 6,902,929 6.902,929 Treatment Facilities 0 0 Disposal Focilitles 11,593 11,593 General Plant and Admin.Facil. 58,241 58,241 Equity in Joint Treatment Facil. 69,686,209 (17,580) 0 69,548,629 Other Assets at Cost Less Amort 1,424 (285) 1,139 Sub-Total 76,621,794 (17,865) 0 76,603,929 Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 82,001,997 210,226 0 82,212,223 County Sanitation District No.2 r Summary Quarterly Financial Report 3 Months Ended Willis Budget Review 1995.96 Remaining Year-to-Date Budget Year-to-Date Budget %Expanded REVENUES: Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Only) 0 0 0 0.00% Tax Allocations/Subventions(Sham of l%) 9.515,000 505,079 9,009.921 5.31% Federal and State Construction Grants 0 0 0 0.00% Connection Fees 2,350,000 852.932 1,497,068 36.29% Other Fees 22,633,000 155.197 22.477.803 0.69% Sale of Capacity Rights 191,000 (1,000) 192.000 .0.52% Interest B Misc.Receipts 4,655,000 1,482,648 3.172,352 31.85% Other 2,000 0 2,000 0.00% Total Revenues 39.346,000 2,994,856 36,361,144 7.61% OUTLAYS: Share of Joint Works T=L Plant 9,921,000 715,772 9,205,228 7.21% District Trunk Sewer Construction 700,000 259.604 140,396 37.09% COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 22,998,000 1,697,710 21,300,290 7,38% Sham of Joint Works Operab ng Expenses 17,619,000 3,839,428 13,779.572 21.79% District Operating S Mer Expenditures 2,202,000 674,167 1,527,843 30.62% Total Outlays 53,440,000 7,186,671 46,283,329 13.46% Facilities Expansion Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance 711195 &Additions Fixed Assets 9/30/96 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: 2-145R2 SARI Manhole 155,846 39.352 195.198 2-7A Atwood Subtronk@ 91157 Interchange 5,319 3,604 8,923 2-38 Olive Subfmnk 6 SAR Crossings for S.A.Widening 13,624 13,624 2-37 Miscellaneous Improvements to Pump Stations 325 325 246 Sewer Encasements for AT S SF Commuter Rail Kfula 115,608 180,256 2-9-RI Cypress Ave.Subtrunk Sewer Rehab. 2,894,115 100,338 2.994.453 Misc Chgs to Closed Work Orders 6,184 118 6.302 2.35 Euclid Trunk B Interceptor 8,167 584 8,751 Sub-Total 3,148,228 259,604 D 3.407,832 Sham of Joint Works 16,074,879 715,772 0 16,790.651 Sub-Total 16,074,879 715,772 0 16,79D,651 COMPLETED PROPERTY.PLANT B EQUIP, Land and Property Rights 517,694 517,694 Collection Lines and Pump Stns. 93,701,134 93,701,134 Treatment Facilities 0 0 Disposal Facilities 33,172 33,172 General Plant and Admin.Facil. 215,420 215,420 Equity in Joint Treatment Facll. 205,201,314 (52,633) 0 205,148,681 Other Assets at Cost Less Amon. 60,100 (5,110) 54,990 Sub-Total 299,728,834 (57,743) 0 299,611,091 Total Property,Plant S Equipment S CIP 318,951,941 917,633 0 319,669,974 • County Serenade.D1a0111!No.3 Summary Quarterly Financial Report 3Monfha Earlml9,30,85 Budget Review 1996-96 Remaining Year-t Data Budget Y.r4a4Mte Budget %Expended REVENUES: Tax Lon(Bond Fund(s)Only) 0 0 0 0.00% Tax AfmcatfoneiSubventions(Share of l%) 10,615,000 567.350 10,047,650 5.34% Federal and Some Construc0on Grants 0 0 0 0.00% Connection Fees 1,410,000 63.450 1,346,550 4.50% Omer Foos 22,314.000 312,084 22,001,930 1.40% Sale of Capacity flights 196,000 (8,484) 204,484 4.33% Interest&Mine.Rocelpte 5,070.000 1.647.327 3,422,673 32.49% Omer 0 0 0 0.00% Total Revenues 39,605.000 2,631,707 37,023,283 6.52% OUTLAYS: Share of Joint Works Trent Plant 10,213,000 629,529 9.583.471 6.16% District Trunk Sewer Construction 6.288,000 676.981 4.611.019 12.80% COP/Bond Rotiremant and Internet Expense 21.180.000 1,558.937 19,621,083 7.36% Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 16.564,000 3,636,419 12.927.581 21.95% District Operating&Omer Expenditures 2,516,000 1,103,298 1,412,702 43.55% Total Outlays 56,761,000 7,606,164 4&165,836 13.64% Facilities Expansion Balance Adjustments Treason,to Balance 711195 &Addition; Find Assets KINDS CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: 3,25 Orange-Weatera Seb-Trunk Relief Sewer 66608.89 56,609 56,609 11.17 Slater PIS Upgrade-3&11 908480.7 908,481 68,899 977,380 336 Tochlm Pipe Replacement 1563292 1,583,292 315,030 1,878,322 336R Rapl.WesMlnntor Ave.Force Maine 222609.6 222,510 8,807 231,317 33714 Widening Project a1T7.411 8,177 116 8,293 338 Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer Improvements 410492 410.491 19,278 429,769 3384 lmpre,to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer 2420 2.420 2,420 338-2 lmprov.to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer 79667a 796,678 264,123 1,080,a01 3484 Impmv.to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer 4780 4.760 "a 5,420 339 Miller-Holder Easement 8751.51 8.752 8.752 Miscellaneous Charges to Closed W.O. 1629.07 1.629 a9 1,717 Sub-Total 3,983,819 676,981 0 4,560,600 Sham of Joint Works 16748.767 629.529 0 17,378,298 Sub-Total 16,748,767 629,529 0 17,376,296 COMPLETED PROPERTY POINT&EQUIP, Land and Property Rights 280.231 280,231 Collection Lines and Pump Stan. 62,069.818 62.059,818 Treatment Facilities 9,922 9,922 Disposal Facilities 28,419 28,419 General Plant and Admin.Facil, 317,991 317.991 Equity In Joint Treatment Facll. 211.213.109 (&1.475) 0 211,158.634 Omer Assets at Cost Lose Amon 0 0 Sub-Total 273,919,490 (64,476) 0 273,865,015 Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 294,652,076 1,262,035 0 285,904,111 County Sanitation District No.5 Summary Quarterly Financial Report 3 Months Ended 9/30/95 Budget Review 1995-96 Remaining Year4 Date Budget Yeer4o47ate Budget %Expended REVENUES: Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Only) 0 0 0 0.00% Tax AllocationslSubventions(Sham of l%) 2,415,000 137,054 2,277,916 5.68% Federal and State Construction Grande 0 0 0 0.00% Connection Fees 47.000 1D81100 (61,100) 230,00% Other Fees 2,719,000 81,929 2,637.071 3.01% Sale of Capacity Rights 23,000 1,642 21.359 7.14% Interest S Misc.Receipts 1,295.000 422,399 872,001 32.62% Other 0 0 0 0,00% Total Revenues 6,499,000 751,154 5.747.846 11.56% OUTLAYS: Share of Joint Works Trmt Plant 1.204,000 43,607 1,160.393 3.62% Dlstrlct Trunk Sewer Construction 500,000 135.085 364.935 27.01% COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 3.920,000 289,281 3.630.719 7.38% Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 2,007.000 486,644 1,520.356 24.25% District Operating&Other Expenditures 765,000 234,297 530,703 30.63% Total Outlays 8,390,000 1,188,894 7,207.106 14.16%' Facilities Expansion Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance 711196 &Additions Fixed Assets 9130/96 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS- 5.33 Bay Bridge PIS Impn 2,224 14 2,238 5-35 So.Coast Trunk Sower-Intl Phases 1 &2 0 2,056 2,056 5.36 Crystal Cove PIS (0) (4,027) (4,027) Miscellaneous Charges to Closed W.O. 1,041 120 1,161 5-31 Coast Highway Force Main Replacement 6&6 (0) 4 4 &32 Bitter Pt&Rocky Pt PIS Improw 6&6 1,921 1,921 6-37.3&4 PCH GrevHy Swr Rehab 5 Is 6 22,036 132,899 154,935 5.39 Siphon 6&6 695,190 695,190 Bay Bridge PIS Lighting 5&6 4,893 3,381 8,274 Hydro0en Peroxide Trials 6&14 714 618 1,332 Sub-Total 728,019 135,065 0 863,084 Share of Joint Works 2.016,001 43,607 0 2,059,608 Sub-Total 2.016,001 43,607 0 2,059,608 COMPLETED PROPERTY.PLANT 8.EQU/P: Land and Property Rights 69,740 69,740 Collection Linos and Pump Sens. 33,827.105 33.827.105 Treatment Facilities 7,347 7.347 Disposal Facilities 7.115 7.115 General Plant and Admin.Facil. 39,799 (397) 39,402 Equity In Joint Treatment Facil. 25,554,914 (6A55) 0 25,548,468 Other Assets at Cost Less Amort 18,009 (7,004) 11,005 Sub-Total 59,624,029 (13,857) 0 59,510,172 Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 62.268,049 164,816 0 62,432,864 Comfy Son/tedon District No.6 Summary Ouanedy F/nendal Report 3 Months Ended 9,3"5 Budget Review 1995-96 Remaining YMH04)e19 Budget Year-t Dma Budget %Expended REVENUES' Taut Levy(Bond Fundis)Only) 0 0 0 0.00% Tax Allocetlona,Subvonflons(Sham of l%) 1,225,000 63.511 1,161.489 5.18% Fedeml and State Construction Grants 0 0 0 O.OD% Connection Fees 47,000 19.270 27.730 41.00% Other Foes 3,400,000 (383) 3,400,363 -0.01% Sale of Capacity Rights 31.000 (3.236) 34236 -10.44% Internet 6 Misc.Receipts 747,000 277,994 469,006 37.21% Other 0 0 0 0.00% Total Revenues 5,460,000 367.156 5,092,844 B.B6% OUTLAYS: Sham of Joint Works TrmL Plant 1.596,000 69.814 1,528.186 4.37% District Trunk So.,Construction 1.735,000 39,901 1.695,099 2.30% COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 2.539,000 181,55D 2,457,450 6.88% Sham of Joint Works Operating Expanses 2,599,000 455.087 2,143,913 17.51% District Operating&Other Expenditures 251,000 72.497 178,503 2B.88% Total Outlays 8.820,000 818,849 8,0111,151 9.2B% Facilities Expanslon Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance 711195 SAdditions Fixed Assets 9130195 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Misc.Chg.to Closed Work Order (32,767) (32.767) 14-1-1 A 8 B Gisler Int,14-1-2 Baker Stmet 1,079,358 5,576 1,084,934 6.12 Falrvmv Relief 248,599 1,098 249,697 6.13 Air Base Servers Abandonment 29,599 29,599 Alrbaso Flowmeter Replacement 19,155 19,155 6-32 Bitter Pt 8 Rocky Pt PIS Improv.5 8 6 700 2 702 5-37384 PCM Gravity Swr Rehab 5 8 6 8,891 33.225 42.116 6-39 Siphon 5 8 6 36.589 36,589 Sub-Total 1,390,124 39,901 0 1,430,025 She.of Joint Works 2,605,984 69,814 0 2,675,T7B Sub-Total 2,605,964 69,814 0 2,675,M COMPLETED PROPERTY PLANT B EOU/P: Land and Property Rights 562 562 Collection Lines and Pump Suns. 4,179,148 4.179.146 Treatment Facilities 2,653 2.653 Disposal Facilities 7,394 7,394 General Plant and Admin.Facll. W,197 397 94,594 Equity In Joint Treatment Facll. 32,001,104 K358) 0 31.992,716 Other Assets at Cost Loss Amon 9,011 (3,558) 5,453 Sub-Total 36,294.069 (11,649) 0 36.282,620 Total Property,Plant 8 Equipment 8 CIP 40,290,157 98,166 0 40.388.323 Comfy Sensation District No.7 Summery QmnoHy Fln...1.1 Report 3 Months Ended 9Qo/95 Budget Review 1995.96 Remaining Year-la-Dats Budget Year-to-Date Budget %Expend.l REVENUES: Tax LoW(Bond Fascia)Only) 0 0 0 0.00% Tat Allocations/Subventions(Sham of l%) 3,230.DW 163.650 3,066.350 5.07% Federal and State Construction Grents 0 0 0 0.00% C....cash Fors 225,000 166.226 68,774 70.73% Other Foes 5,960,000 107.708 5,852,292 1.81% Sale of Capacity Rights 0,000 11,550 41.450 21.79% Internet S Misc.Receipts 1,626,000 525,619 1,000,381 34.44% Other 0 0 0 0.00% Total Revenues 11,004,000 274,753 10.029.247 8.88% OUTLAYS: Share of Joint Works Trmt Plant 2.780,000 261,082 2.518,938 9.39% District Trunk Sewer Construction 2,400,000 136.045 2.263,955 5.67% COP/Bond Retirement and Internet Expense L, 7,= 318,060 4.028.940 7.32% Sham or Joint Works Operating Expenses 4,655,000 1,181.826 3.473.172 25.39% District Operating S Other Expenditures 1,959,000 369.718 1,599,282 18.87% Total Outlays 16.141,000 2,266,713 13,874,297 14.04% Facilities Expansion Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance 7/1/95 &Additions Fixed Assets 9I30198 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: 7-22 Parallel B Repi.Lemon Hel9hto 173,307 65,619 239.010 743.1 College Ave.Pump San Rep!Force Maine 10.991 200 17.191 Mac Arthur P/S Ventilation 5,708 5,706 7.7.1 Main SC PIS Improv. 54,852 3D,964 MINIS 7-18 Orange Perk Acres Sower Study 124.537 124,537 7.19 Cowan Heights Sower 55.335 55,335 Fame Mein Districts 6,7314 2.315,534 12.672 2,328,206 Swr Mtce Easement Intl..Book. 13.238 13,236 7.14 Abandon 9 PIS,7-14432 239,168 24.266 263,433 7.16 Lemon Heights Sower 57.172 400 W.Sn 7.1.1 Glsleditedhlll Trunk Abandonment 9.716 676 10,392 Tachitr Pipe Replacement 2,663 2.663 7-17 Orange Perk Acres Sewer Repl. 35.180 35,180 Miscellaneous Charges to Closed W.O. 1.876 1,249 3.125 SURTotal 3,105,346 136,046 0 3,241,3110 Share of Joint Works 4,525.671 261,062 0 4,786,773 Sub-Total 4,625,671 261.062 0 4,786,723 COMPLETED PROPERTY.PLANrB EQUIP: Land and Property Rights 1,549,310 1,549,310 Collection Lines and Pump Stns. 36,089.277 4 W.089,281 Treatment Feaililirs 0 0 Disposal Facilities 10,782 10.782 General Plant and Admin.Facil. 92,099 92.099 Equity In Joint Treatment Facll. 57.219.422 (15.005) 0 57,204,417 Other Assets at Cost Less AmorL 3.324 (685) 2.659 Sub-Total 94,984,214 (16,888) 0 94,941111 Total Property,Plant S Equipment S CIP 102.595.230 381,441 0 102,978,971 County Sanifeflon Dlsirlcf No.11 Summary Quarterly Financial Report 3 Monfhs Endsd 9/30N5 Budget Review 1995-96 Remaining Year-ta-Dato Budget Year-to-Daw Budget %Expended REVENUES: Tax Levy(Bond Pencils)Only) 17,000 1,863 15.137 10.96% Tax Allorationa/Subvemions(Sham of l%) 2,041,000 111,222 1,929,778 5,45% Federal and State Construction Grants 0 0 0 0.00% Connection Fees 118,000 206,800 (88,800) 175.25% Other Fees 3.220,000 (52,580) 3,272,500 -1,63% Salo of Capacity Rights 40,000 4,925 35.075 12.31% Interest&Misc.Receipts 931,000 375,112 555.888 40.29% Other 0 0 0 0.00% Total Revenues 4,367,000 $47.342 8,719,659 10.17% OUTLAYS: Share of Joint Works Trmt Plant 2.099.000 155.535 1.943,466 7.41% District Trunk Sower Construction 1.635,000 361.720 1.273.280 22.12% COPIRond Retirement and Interest Expanse 4,003,000 263,980 3.739.020 &59% Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 3.486,000 894,627 2,591,373 25.66% District Operating&Other Expenditures 737,000 515,031 221,969 69.88% Total Outlays 11,960,000 2,190,893 9,769,107 18.32% Facilities Expansion Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance 7/1/95 BAdditions Fixed Assets 9/30195 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Slater PIS Motor&Pump 47 47 11-17 Slater PIS Sewago Sys Improv. 4,414.216 361.720 4,775.936 Miscellaneous Charge to Closed W.O. 954 954 Sub-Tetal 4,415,217 361,720 a 4,776,937 Share of Joint Works 3,450.205 155,535 a 3,605,740 Sub-Total 3,450,205 165,636 0 3.605,740 COMPLETED PROPERTY PLANT 8 EQUIP: Land and Property Rights 146,986 146,986 Collection Linos and Pump Sirs. 19,048,602 19.048,602 Treatment Facilities 0 0 Disposal Facilities 3,053 3.053 General Plant and Admin.Facil. 30,682 0 30,682 Equity In Joint Treatment Facll. 43.058,620 (11.303) 0 43,047,317 Other Assets at Cost Lase Amorl 0 0 Sub-Total 62,287,943 (11,303) 0 62,276,640 Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 70,153,385 505,962 0 70,669,317 County San/ladon District No.13 e Summary Quarterly Financial Report 3 Months Ended 913(l - Budget Review 1995-96 Remaining Year-to-Dato Budget Year4o-Date Budget %Expended REVENUES: Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Only) 0 0 0 0.00% Tax Allocations/Subventions(Sham of l%) 0 0 0 0.00% Federal and Slate Construction Grants 0 0 0 0.00% Connection Fees 470,000 0 470.000 0.00% Other Fees 818,000 236 817764 0.03% Sale of Capacity Rights 6.000 5T/ 5,423 9.62% Interest&Mt...Receipts 382.000 146,946 235,054 38.47% Other 0 0 0 0.00% Total Revenues 1,676,000 147,769 1,528,241 8.82% OUTLAYS: Share of Joint Works Tent Plant 322,000 34,875 287,125 10.83% DlsWct Trunk Sewer Construction 472,000 0 472,000 0,004 COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 27.000 2.910 24.090 10.78% Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 576,OD0 127,697 448,303 22.17% District Operating&Other Expenditures 64,000 1.470 62,530 2.30% Total Outlays 1,461,000 166.962 1,294,048 11.43% Facilities Expansion Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance 711195 It Additions Fixed Assets 9130195 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Share of Joint Works 512,833 34,875 0 547,708 Sub-Total 512,833 34,875 0 647,708 COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT 8 EQUIP: Land and Property Rights 0 0 Collection Lines and Pump Sms. 2.616,757 2.616.757 Treatment Facilities 0 0 Disposal Facilities 0 0 General Plant and Admin.Facll. 0 0 Equity in Joint Treatment Facll. 6,402,440 (1,717) 0 6,400,723 Other Assets at Cost Lase Amort. 0 0 Sub-Total 9,019,197 (1,717) 0 9,017,480 Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 9.532,030 33,169 0 91666.188 ` County Sanitation District No.14 Summary Quarterly Financial Report 3 Months Ended 9 0/95 Budget Revlam, 1995-95 Remaining Year-to-Date Budget Year-to-Date Budget %Expanded REVENUES: Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Only) 0 0 0 0.00% Tax Allo.Oons/Subvontions(Share of 1%) 0 0 0 0.00% Federal and Slato Construction Grants 0 0 0 0.00% IRWD Feas 9.100.000 0 9,100.000 0.00% Other Fees 0 2,010 (2,010) 0.00% Sale of Capacity Rights 41,000 (1,190) 42,190 -2.90% Interest&Misc.Receipts 268,000 454,306 (186,306) 169.52% Other 0 0 0 0.00% Total Revenues 9,409,000 455,126 8.953,874 4.84% OUTLAYS: Share of Joint Works Trmt Plant 2,116,000 170,946 1,945,054 8.08% District Trunk Saser Construction 615,000 32,692 582.308 5.32% COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 158.000 17,120 140.880 10.84% Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 1.463,000 166,950 1,296,050 11.41% District Operating&Other Expenditures 511,000 83,846 427,154 16.41% Total Outlays 4.863,000 471,654 4.391,446 9.70% Facilities Expansion Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance 711195 &Additions Fixed Assets 9130195 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS, Main Street Flume Flovnneter 0 40 40 14-14 A&B Gisler Int,14-1-2 Baker St Force Main,Districts 6,7&14 5,827,644 3?441 5.860,085 Main St Pump Station Improvements 7-7-1 94,911 94.911 Bay Bridge P/S Lighting 5&6 258 178 436 Hydrogen Peroxide Trials 38 33 71 Sub-Total 5,922,851 32,692 0 5,955,543 Share of Joint Works 3,429,089 170,946 0 3.600.036 Sub-Total 3,429.089 170,946 0 3.600,035 COMPLETED PROPERTY PLANT&EQUIP: Land and Property Rights 0 0 Collection Lines and Pump Sins. 19,382,254 19,382,254 Treatment Facilities 0 0 Disposal Facilities 0 0 General Plant and Admin.Facll. 6.747 6.747 Equity In Joint Treatment Facil. 42.161.369 (11,285) 0 42.150,064 Other Assets at Cost Less Amon 0 0 Sub-Total 61,650,370 (11,285) 0 61,539,085 Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 70,902,310 192,363 0 71,094,663 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY SUMMARY JOINT OPERATINGIWORNING CAPITAL FUND BUDGET REWEW 3 MONTHS ENDED MW93 APPROVED BUDGET YEAR-TO-DATE UNEXPENDED YEAR-TO-DATE 1996-96 EXPENDITURES BUDGET %EXPENDED SALARIES.WAGES It BENEFITS Salon..&Wage. 32,283,000 7.035,264 25.247.736 21.79% Payroll Benefits 7,864.050 1,844,631 8,039,389 21.40% TOTAL PAYROLL 39.907.001) 6,679.895 31257.105 21.72% Leas: Chargeout.W Clsb B CORF (11,3011,00(1) (1,181,243) (10,118,757) 10.45% NET JOINT OPERATING PAYROLL 2aJX7p00 7,40,652 21.165.348 26.16% MATERIALS SUPPLIES&SERVICES Gasoline,Oil& Diesel 175,000 29,353 145.647 16.77% Insurance 1.250,000 363,707 666,293 29.1G% Membership. 58,000 26.400 29.60D 48.97% Office Expanse 482,900 78.633 386,267 16.55% Chlorine&Odor Control 3.818,50) 491.606 3.326.834 12.88% Chemical Csae.lanb 1,545,000 241.798 1.303.202 15.65% Other Operating Supplies 987.900 189.170 798,73U 19.15% Contractual Smelc.s 7,269,600 1,031,781 5.637,719 22.45% PmM.elonal Somicos 1,512,800 321.803 1.190.707 4.43% Printing&Publication 3411800 42,712 299,088 12.50% EAulp...t Rental 235,700 5619M 178,764 24.16% Repair&Ali..... 4,209,000 $41,028 3.36&a72 19.98% Research&Monitoring 3.095,000 M.480 2,756,520 10.94% T.Yol,Mooting&T.Ining 847,500 90,253 557,247 13.94% Uncolloctibio Accounts 16,OD0 131 14,669 am Utilities 3.375.500 567.407 2,814,033 16.81% Oliver Expenses 868,700 118,648 749.854 13.08% Prior You.Expense 20,000 0 20.00D 0.00% Non operating Exp.nau 94.5013 14.837 79.663 15.70% TOTAL MATERIALS&SERWCES 29,983,000 5,445.201 24.537,799 16,10% Lees: Allocation to Gists A CORP (470,000) (128,13D) (341.870) 27.28% NET JOINT OPER MATERIALS&SERWCES 2&513,000 5,317,071 24,195.929 18.02% TOTAL JOINT OPERATING EXPENSES 58,180,000 12,615,723 45,384,277 22.03% REVENUES Revenues (3.80D.000) (742.099) (3,057,901) 19.53% NET JOINT OPERATING REVENUES (3,800,01)(1) (742.099) (3,057,001) 19.53% NET JOINT OPERATING EXPENSES 54,380.000 12.073,624 42,300,376 22,20% GALLONAGE DATA M.G.FLOW CHARGES DISTRICT BUDGET TO DATE BUDGET TO DATE 1 2.157 2.321 1,352,750 1,264,943 2 7,023 6.935 4,404,75D 3.839.428 3 6,603 6.568 4,141,000 3.836.419 5 800 879 501,750 486.644 6 1,035 822 649,750 455,087 7 1,855 2.135 1.163.750 1.181.828 11 1.389 1,616 571.500 804,627 13 230 231 1".WD 127,697 14 582 3D1 365,750 168.950 21,672 21,5D6 13.595.000 12.073.623 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVMO FUND PROJECT SUMMARY SUMMARY OF✓ONT WORKS CONSTRUCTION REOUMEME Page 1 of 4 FISCAL YEAR 199596 3 MONTHS ENDED 9130W Prepared By: Bill Mdrklga (1) (2) 131 (2) + 13) 1t)-0 MEMO WORK REVISED TOTAL REGUIRED ACCUMULATE CURRENT FY PROJECT UNEXPENDED COMPLETED JOBS ORDER PROJECT EST BUDGET COST OUTLAY COST BUDGET TRANSFER TO 1995.96 1995-96 @ 6130195 TO 9/30195 TO DATE FIXED ASSETS A.Reclamation Plant 1 New and Rebudgeted Melor Prolocts: 1.Electrification of Pump Drives.Pi-36.1 53717-A 1.700,000 50.000 1,068,911 249.846 1,316,757 (199,846) 2.Secondary Treatment Expansion to 80 MGD,PI-36.2 53717-8 47.ODD,000 6.500.000 118,137 37,696 155,832 6.462.305 3.Primary Treatment 72 MOD Expansion,Pt-37 537194 38.125.000 1.000.000 166.613 1265) 166,348 1.000.265 4.Security&Landscaping•Pt-38.1 52108-F 11510,000 10.000 1,573.145 49,617 1,622,762 139,617) S.Misc.Mods.Priority Elements P1-36-2 52100-0 4,810,000 10.000 51007.900 85,780 5,093,760 175,780) 6.Misc.Modifications to Plant 1.P1-38.4 52109-H 2.550.000 50.000 1.927.039 192,724 2,119.763 1142,724) 7.Fire Protection-Sign.and Water Sys Mod...P1-38-5 52108J 3.060,000 900.000 463.663 11.185) 462.478 901,185 B. Electl.Facility Modifl s&Safety Upgrades.P1.40.1 62187-A 8.625.000 133,378 1.207 134,585 11,207) 9. Fac ModH.&Safety Upgrades,P1 40-2 52187-8 2,025.000 500,000 288,370 7.326 295.696 492,674 10.Prim Clarifiers 3.4&5 Rehab. Pt-41 62199-A 2.350,000 1,000.000 251.454 6,379 257.833 993,621 11.Selmic Parrott of Non-Structure Systems,PI-0 52229-A 4.250,000 117,194 117,194 0 12 Seismic Real Stmctuel Items,isl 41,2,3 52125-8 4.250.000 1GO.000 922.135 179 922,314 99,821 (198.1981 13.Chemical and Washhauler Facility Medlin,P1-46-2.3 52239-A 3,020,000 401.010 7,900 4081998 (7,980) 14. 12KV Distribution System for Support Facilities,P147 62255.0 2.650,000 400.000 141.966 3,965 145.921 396.035 15.Misc Architectural&Treatment Pit Imprvmts.P1-48 52268-0 835.000 400.000 107,345 355 107,700 399.646 16.40 MOD Oxygen Acilvated Sludge&DAF's 65.463.000 17.Bell Process 14 Unite) 14,300.000 18.Solids Storage(4 Sins) 10,177.000 19. Digesters: 2 @ 110'Diameter 91100.000 20. 12kv Electrical Power Distribution 2.477,000 21.Emergency Sewage Bypass System 1,922,000 22.Remove Trickling Rhers 1 &3 1,300,000 23.Miscellaneous Special Projects Pint. 1, P1-49 4,385,000 60,000 50,000 24.Misc.Jab Plan Praject, (Sea Schedule CI 22.125,000 500,000 60,054 40,541 106,596 459,459 0 26.Other Master Plan Projects a.Headworks No. I Rebuild,2003 14,950,000 b.Headworks No.2 lmpolhr/Pump Spaed.2016 2,600,OOD c.Remove TdcHing Filters 2&4,2007 1,300.DD0 d.40 Mgd Oxygen Act'd Sludge&DAF, 2017 34,000,D00 a. 110-R Digesters. 2003&2012 18,200,000 1.4 Bak Presets,2004 101920.000 9. 12 KV Power Distribution, 2001-2012 1,099.000 h.Standby Power Generation,2006&2015 4,914,000 1.72 Mgd Primary Treatment,2004&2012 32,600.000 SUB-TOTAL -RECLAMATION PLANT I 3]8,492.000 11,470.OD0 12.752,392 682.144 13,434,536 10.797,856 (166,19g1 "M AL OUTLAY REVOL VNG FUND MWECT SUMMARY SUMMARY OF"Mill'WORKS CONSTRUCTRMI REOLMREMENTS Page 2 of 4 MSCAL YEAR a99 W 3 MONTNS ENDED 9130195 (1) 12) (3) 12I + (3) It -131 MEMO WORK REVISED TOTAL REQUIRED ACCUMULATE CURRENT FY PROJECT UNEXPENDED COMPLETED JOBS ORDER PROJECT EST BUDGET COST OUTLAY COST BUDGET TRANSFER TO 1995-96 1995.96 @ 6130195 TO 9/30/95 TO DATE FIXED ASSETS 8.Plant 2 New and Based red Maio,Rosins: 1.Support Facilities and Site Improvements a.Operations Bulltlin8,P2-23-5.1 53715.0,A 3,550,000 350,000 3,398,576 43,357 3,441,933 306,643 (2,935) b.Warehouse Building,P2-35-2 51813-H 3,820,000 1,400,000 308,582 308,582 1,4DO,000 c.Maintenance Hustling,P2-35-3 51813-F 4,000,000 1,400,000 263.064 24.758 287,822 1,375,242 d.Phase II Site&Security Imp.,P2-35-5 51813-E 2,475.000 176,309 176,309 0 9.Continuation Management Office,M-0441P2-35-41 51813-13 6901000 250,000 277,094 194,205) 182,889 344.205 2.Rehab 7 Digenare.P2-39-1.2.3 52045.0 14,225,000 250,000 629.657 745 530.402 249,255 3.Primary Treatment 24 MGD Expansion,P2.4/ 63714-0 14,505,000 4,549 4,549 0 4.Secondary Treatment Expansion,P2.42-2 53718-0,8 18.000,000 1.400,000 16,273,049 610,531 16,883,580 789,469 S.Priority Misc.Mad., P2.43.1 52108.6 4,850,000 60,000 5,011,628 28,069 5,039,697 21,931 6.Misc. Modifications.P2.43.3 521M-E 2.510,000 10.000 2.640,696 66,733 2,707.429 (56,733) 7.Plant 2 Influent Diversion 2.500,000 200,000 200,000 S. Fee Protection,Signs&Water Sys Modifns,P2-46 52176-0 4,616,000 119001000 440,101 707 440,808 1,899,293 S. Deal Fee Modifns&Safety Upgrades,P2.47.1 52189-A 3,450,000 113,362 969 114,331 (969) 10.Faa Modifns&Safety Upgrade.,P237.2 52189-6 4,015,000 5001000 290.452 12,075 303,327 487,125 11.Primary Clarifier Rehab. P2.48 52199-6,E 618001000 BOD,000 474,753 1,875 476,628 498,125 12.Some Retrofit of Non-Structure Systems, P2-50 52229-6 4,800,000 165,811 165,811 0 13.Seismic Retrofit,Structural Items P2-53.2,3,4,5,6 52108-C 8,410,000 501000 3,262,714 3,262,714 50,000 (2,577,3691 14.Chemical and Plant Water Madifna,P2.55 52239-8 4.200,000 1AOO.000 335,527 22,528 368,055 1,377,472 16.Misc Seismic Modllns&Flare Improvements.P2-56 52269-0 5251000 260,000 19,648 1,403 21,051 248,597 16.Mil...laneous Prol.m.Spacial projects Plant 2 4,650,000 50.000 60,OD0 17.Solids Storage: 2 Bins 5.200,000 18.Additional 105 Foot Digester 3,900,000 19.Plant Water Pump Station 1,170,000 20.Reclaimed Water System Pint.2 4,820,000 75,000 75.000 21.Misc.Job Plan ProN.te (Be.Schedule D1 22.260.000 500.000 103.950 16,412 120.362 483,588 0 22.Other Mane,Plan Project, a.Replace Primary Begins A,B,C,2006 11,7001000 It.Standby Power Generation,2005&2015 10.0001000 c.Monitoring and Control System,2005 520,000 SUB-TOTAL -TREATMENT PLANT 2 172,050,000 10,535,000 34,089,522 736,757 34,826,279 9,798,243 12,680,3C41 C.Water Reclamation Regional Expansion 75,500,00D 100,000 100,000 Transfer to projects Below (BBO,ODD) (47,g141 0 147,8141 Reclmatlon Plant No. 1 Water Quality Management Study 58231-0 280,000 153 1,640 153 1,693 0 OCSD/OCWD Regional Water Reclamation Plant Study 62133-E 400 000 47,]111 148,837 4]761 196,598 0 SUB-TOTAL- WATER RECLAMATION REGIONAL EXPANSION 76,500,000 100.000 150,377 47.914 198,291 52,086 0 CAPITAL OUTLAYREVOLVINGFUND PROJECTSUMMARY SUMMARY OF JORIT WORKS CONSTRUCTION REOUMEMENTS Page 3 of 4 FISCAL YEAR 1995-96 3 MONTHS EMBED 9/30y95 (11 (2) 3) (21 + (3) Ill-131 MEMO WORK REVISED TOTAL REQUIRED QCCUIVIULATE CURRENT FY PROJECT UNEXPENDED COMPLETED J065 ORDER PROJECT EST BUDGET COST OUTLAY COST BUDGET TRANSFER TO 1995.96 1995.96 @ 6/30/95 TO 9130195 TO DATE FIXED ASSETS D.Interphad and Joint Facilities 1.Support Facilities and Site Improvements a. Demolition of Old Lob for Offices.J-11-1 52083-A 230.000 200.000 27.858 27,858 200,000 b.Central Lob Expansion J-17-3 910,000 160,000 160.000 Transfer to Projects Below 169,767) (42,3001 (42.300) Purch&Intl of flecks to Secure Gas Cylinders&Dower 52293.0 27,467 0 15,749 15,749 0 Office Reconfigurmad for Enviorn Mgmt Area 52351-0 42,300 42,300 0 42.300 c.Demolition or Reuse of Old Control Center 245,000 d.Demolition of Support Bldg.@Pt],J-27 52084.0 190,OOD 109,504 109.604 0 2.Outsell&Booster Pump Stations e.Surge Tower Replacement,J-34-1 62241-0 6,600.DD0 1,185,000 768.699 768,699 1.185,000 b.Ovtfall Reliability&Pumping Annex COSS'C'J-34 31.085,000 c. Et&Rapt 78"to Deep Water w1120"Outsell 92,050,000 3.Computerized Fee.Records and Dwg.Sys.J-25-1 58216.0 4.710,000 500.000 209,406 10,411 219,817 489,589 4.Sued.Power Systems Rehab.Studies J-25.2.3&4 58216-A 1,225.000 200,000 14,961 26,171 41,132 173.829 5.Plante 1&2 MonitorlConVol Sys. J-31-1.2.3,4,6 52215.0.3 11,050.000 1.900,000 2,127,616 90,471 2,208,087 1.819,529 130,8111 Transfer to Projects Below (2,225,600) 175,2481 175,248) SCADA Retrofit Hardware Platform at Pile 1 &2 52215-A 2.200,000 49.648 423,684 49,649 473,332 0 141,4251 Power Bldg 41 Mr Conditioning&Modifn for J-31 62342-0 25.600 25,600 0 25,600 S.Standby Power Reliability Modilns,J-33.1,2 52240.0.A 14,576,000 1,050,000 445,593 22,532 468,125 1,027.468 ].Bushard Interplant Trunk Replacement 31,000.000 B.Blesollds Disposal Projects a.Compost Demonstration Plant 9,ODO'" b.Lend Acquisition 68242.0 23,000,000 14.708 14,708 (14,708) c.Landfill Development Pheee 1 26,600,000 d.Compost Facility 50,000,000 a.Blosollds DIep.Landfill Phase ll 2011 15,600,000 I.Blosollde Disp.Equip Phase I&II 3001 11.500.000 g. Electrical Power Distribution. 12kv 2.707,000 9..District Information Management Network a.Maint. &Oper Mgmnt Computer System 62149-A 1.050.00D 100.000 696,593 096.693 100,000 (149.267) Transfer to D. Item 13(Schedule El (25.0001 (25,000) It.Lob Information Management System Upgrades 52149-B 605,OOU 126,000 47.773 47,773 125,000 Transfer to D.loom 13 SSchedule E) (108,10]) (1O11,107) c.Financial Information System 52149-C 970.000 600,OOD 209,073 209,073 600," 112,180) d.Network System Integration 52149-E 820,000 340,000 1,786 679 2,465 339.321 e.CO-Optical Data Archiving 125,000 50.000 WOOD CAPITAL OUTLAYREVOLViNG FUND PROJECT SUMMARY SUMMARY OF JOINT WORKS CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS Page 4 of 4 FISCAL YEAR 1995-M 3 MONTHS ENDED 9130195 11) (2) (3) (21 + 131 (11.13) MEMO WORK REVISED TOTAL REQUIRED ACCUMULATE CURRENT FY PROJECT UNEXPENDED COMPLETED JOBS ORDER PROJECT EST BUDGET COST OUTLAY COST BUDGET TRANSFER TO 1995.96 1995-96 @ 6130/95 TO 9130196 TO DATE FIXED ASSETS 10.In-Plant Sampling System Medlin 220,000 1001000 100,000 Transfer to Project Below (30,260) 1567) (5671 Final Sampler System Upgrades 52331.0 30,260 567 447 567 1.014 0 11.Improvements to Central Generation 650,000 300,000 300,000 Transfer to Projects Below (42,200) (42,2001 (42,200) Boller Chemlcal Dosing System 52348-0 2,800 2,800 0 2,800 Piping Insulation Addition 52349-0 4,800 4,800 0 4,800 Steam System Medlin 52350.0 34.600 34.600 0 34,600 12.Cable Tray Improvements 2.400,000 100.000 10g000 13.Min Job Plan Projects See Schedule El 16,525,000 500,000 313,520 32,517 346,037 467,403 (187,468) Transfer from 0.Items 10 a&b Projects Above 133,1071 1 1 133,107 SUB-TOTAL -INTERPLANT&JOINT 356.442,000 7.410.000 5,812262 237,704 5849,966 7,172.298 (421.161) SUB-TOTAL - MAJOR PROJECTS 982,484,000 39.515.000 52.604,563 1,704.619 54,309,072 27,810,481 13,156,663) E.Special Projects,Studies&Research 1.Master Planning Issues a.Para/Adman.Support Fee @ Pit 1 J-26,J-30 53716-0152083-0 298,000 75,000 274,935 56 274,991 74,944 It. Peak Hydraulic Discharge/Outfoll Studies 2,850,000 400.000 400,000 Transfer 1.Project Below 11151.000) Determination of Peek Hydraulic Discharge 58241-0 1,151,000 0 0 c.Coll,Truant&Diep Fac.Strategic Study 4,225,000 200.000 200,000 d. NPDES Permit Support 58209-F 1,175.000 100.000 427,445 273 427,718 99,727 2.Air Quality Control Program a.Taxies and ROG Control:Blotrickling filter R&D 68227-0 440,000 90,000 304,697 24,850 329,547 66,150 b.Air Emissions:Source Control Feasibility Study/Metal 75,000 25,000 25,000 c.Air Quality Management Implementation Plan 69232.0 150,000 21,640 21,640 D d. Biofilter for Pump Stations 60.000 25,000 25,000 e.A.G. Database Development 76.000 25.000 25,000 1.Central Gen Parameter Monitoring 58235-0 350.000 75.000 3,519 3,519 75,000 SUB-TOTAL-SPECIAL PROJECTS 9.688,000 1016.000 1032.236 25.179 1,057,415 989,821 0 F. Eculoment Items 12,726,000 3,000low 1,666,785 271,178 1 93],883 2,728,822 (1 644,407) SUB-TOTAL-JOINT WORKS CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS 1,044.897,000 33,630,000 65,303.674 2,000,876 67,304,450 31.529,124 (4,701,070) CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS COMPLETED AT 6130195 SCHEDULE F 95,017,660 147,698)1 94,969,962 47,698 180,525,4481 TOTAL JOINT WORKS CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS 1.044.697.000 1 33.530,000 150321,234 1,953.1781 152,274,412 31,576,822 (95,226,5101 a w rVerbal OINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 15, 1995 Item (14): Consideration of the following actions relative to Ocean Outfall Booster Station Control System Upgrade at Plants Nos. 1 & 2, Job No. J-31-2: report of Director of Engineering eration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for oject, clarifying contractor's license requirements. eration of Resolution No. 95-114, receiving and filing bid tabulation and endation and awarding contract for Ocean Outfall Booster Station Control Upgrade at Plants Nos. 1 &2, Job No. J-31-2, to Shasta Electric, LP, in the total of$880,820.00. Summary In February 1993, in accordance with the original Scope of Work, the Directors approved the Project Report for Expansion of Existing Computers and Control Systems at Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-31. The project being presented at this time for award is divided into two parts. The first part is the replacement of the Ocean Outfall Booster Station Control System Upgrade, item H from the original Scope of Work. The second part is the Fisher-Porter Influent Metering System, item F from the original Scope of Work. This is the J-31-2 project. The plans and specifications were modified through one addendum that provided better details concerning contractor's license requirements. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends consideration of the following actions re Ocean Outfall Booster Station Control System Upgrade, Job No. J-31-2. (1) Consideration of motion approving Addendum 1 to the plans and specifications for said project, clarifying contractor's license requirements. (2) Consideration of a resolution receiving and filing bid tabulation and awarding contract for Ocean Outfall Booster Station Control System Upgrade, Job No. J-31-2, to Shasta Electric, LP, in the total amount of$880,820.00. J WPD00163WD9AH0V 14wPD COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS October 24, 1996 11:00 a.m. at ORANGE COUNTY. GLIFGNNIA 1 Addendum teBld 2lLrJyeglE AM OM e127 WII VN .CNROPIN92 4127 BID TABULATION p1a1M6 11 Job No. J-31-2 PROJECT TITLE: Ocean Outfall Boaster Station Control System Uoorade PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Replacement of Fischer-Porter Control System at the Ocean Outfall Booster Station System at Plant No. 2 and Replacement of Fischer-Porter Influent Metering System at Plants Nos. 1 and 2 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE: $1.000.000 BUDGET AMOUNT: $1,200.000 TOTAL CONTRACTOR BID 1. Shasta Electric, LP, Walnut, CA $ 880,820.00• 2. Soffa Electric, Inc., Los Angeles, CA $ 913,000.00 3. Brown Automation, Inc., Adelanto, CA $ 966,948.00 *Corrected Total I have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend award to sta Electric, LP, in the bid amount of 5880,820 as the lowest and best bid. David ALuddwwil►i`in, P.E. Director of Engineering h COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS a of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1OBA4 ELLI5 AVENUE va.BOX S127 November 7, 1995 MUNTAIN VALLEY,CAUEORN1A 8212E 8127 P141982.2411 STAFF REPORT OMTS95-039: Consideration of Resolution No. 95- , approving Addendum No. 1 to plans and specification for construction of improvements to Ocean Outfall Booster Station Control System Upgrade, Job No. J-31-2. umma In February 1993, in accordance with the original Scope of Work, the Directors approved the Project Report for Expansion of Existing Computers and Control System Upgrade at Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-31. The project being presented at this time for award is divided into two parts. The first part is the replacement of the Ocean Outfall Booster Station Control System Upgrade, item H from the original Scope of Work. The second part is the Fisher-Porter Influent Metering System, item F from the original Scope of Work. This is the J-31-2 project. The Ocean Outfall Booster Station Upgrade was installed approximately six years ago. The Fisher-Porter Distributed Control System (DCS)failed to meet the required performance criteria necessary for this installation. The computer hardware is unreliable and is no longer supported. The control system was modified in 1989 by Districts' staff to work around the problems being experienced. These changes allow one pump to function as a lag pump to the Rolhrock/Foster Pump Stations. The remaining pumps work in local mode only and require 24-hour monitoring by operators. The system has a history of continuing problems (at the rate of one or two a month, requiring a system manual restart) in either hardware or software. Some of the hardware is no longer supported by Emulex, the manufacturer of the storage media system. In order to increase the hardware reliability, an excessive renovation would be required to replace the hard drives, controllers, and memory. The existing control system will be replaced with a highly-reliable programmable controller-based system. Job No. J-31-2 will replace the Fisher-Porter DCS with a programmable logic controller, which will allow graphic displays, alarm handling and setpoint control by the operators at the Main Control Center or locally, reducing the need for this station to be permanently manned by Operations staff. The Fisher-Porter Influent Supervisory System, which was a custom design installed under Job No. J-24, provides the Districts with a report of average, maximum, minimum, and totaled flow rates for each influent trunk. The system has had a number of software problems over recent years. The replacement of this system and integrating the flow signals into the SCADA system by Job No. J-31-2 will correct the outstanding software problems and increase the Districts' ability to collect data and create reports from any workstation on the network. Both systems described above will be fully integrated into the SCADA systems at Plant Nos. 1 and 2, reducing software maintenance to one common program. OMTS95-039 November 7, 1995 Page 2 Budaet Information The consulting fine of CH2M Hill has provided an estimate for the work to be $1.1 million. This estimate is based on preliminary design drawings, sketches, layouts and selected types of equipment. A revised budget summary is attached showing all J-31 related projects and costs. The tasks labeled as items 13 and 17 on this summary are included in the project being submitted for approval. A summary of the submitted construction bids is attached. There was one addendum associated with the bidding of the work. This clarified the requirements for the contractor's license. Staff Recommendation A. That the Joint Boards of Directors approve Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for said project, clarify contractors license requirements. B. That the Joint Boards receive and file bid tabulation and award contract for Ocean Outfall Booster Station Control System Upgrade, Job No. J-31-2, to Shasta Electric, LP, in the amount of$880,820.00. JDL:gc JAW PDOCTNGWGR R PTSLSRI I-07.95 Originator:John Linder Department Head:one LudMn ATTACHMENT `A' Revised August 29,1995 a June 2.1994 COMPUTERQATION OF PLANT MONITORING 8 AUTOMATION IMPROVEMENTS BUDGET SUMMARY PERIODI PLANTI PLANT2 TOTAL COMPLETED WORK M-Milu ns 1sw 1. Imiall HBO Computer Monitoring System and 6Eer optic network. f2.10 M S2DO M f4.10 M 1994 Preserdly mmitcrs 16%Plant 1 and 30%Plant 2 July 2 Purciwe CRISP Software Site License,bom Plants $0.22 M f0.22 M SOA4 M 1994 3. Purehace DOW Equipment,VAX Computer Equipment $0.40 M SOAO M Nov 4. Compumr System Setup and Factory Test(Re N 69 6) $0.04 M $0.04 M 1994 July S. Job J31 awarded to CH2MHII work cWnpkled 50.17M 50.40M $0.57M 1995 fi. b1Poel CRISP132 TraWng for Stag EO.D4M •SO."M 7. Purchase Dlgital Equipment VAX Computer Equip.(Per#2) $0.35M •50.35 M TOTAL COST OF COMPLETED WORK 52.97 M $297 M $5.26 M FUTURE AUTHORIZED WORK 1996-6 I 8. Completion of minaini g J31 System Design and Implementation $0.20 M $0.63 M 5093 M FUTURE PROPOSED WORK(Preliminary Estimme i Costs for Budgeting Purposes) 1995.7 9. IrWaO AddNorml Firer Optic Network and Communications Equip $045M SOSOM $095M 10. Remodel Office 8 Development Lab.for Plant Automation Group $0.15 M 50.16M 11. Upgrade and co sMidme PLOs(Per 9 8) $0.8 M SO.83M $1.63 M 12 Computer System Setup and Factory Test(Re#7) SO 04 M 50.04 M 13. Replace Ocean OUHaO Booster Station DCS(Per#2 S 8) $0.80 M •$0.20 M 14. Automate Plant 1 Headwon s,Design(Per 0 8) $0.45 M $OAS M 15. Integrate digel 5-10 controls into edsting PLC(Per#8) 50.39 M f0.0f M 16. Replace and madly secondary Vestment process¢sung $020 M 50.70 M S09 M klstrumeNatlan and control systems(Per 0 8) 17. Replaced Influent Metering System(Par#8) $0.10 M $0.10 M •30 00 M I& Carrongency Fund $0.98M $1.00M f196M TOTAL COST FOR PROPOSED FUTURE WORK E3.52 M E3.97 M 57.49 M GRAND TOTAL COMPLETED AND PROPOSED WORK AT BOTH PLANTS $1496 M Ongolm 1 20. Matlmum Staffmg(Already Budgeted) E0.31M f0.31M Revised Estimate for Construction Costs SJH:cm R:\WPDOC=10iEM DL19 MATT 'a JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 15, 1995 Agenda Item (15): Consideration of Resolution No. 95-116, approving Standardized Emergency Management System Operational Area Agreement (SEMS) with the County of Orange. Summa The Standardized Emergency Management System was established to provide a framework for responding to and managing emergencies and disasters involving multiple jurisdictions and agencies. The Operational Area includes all political subdivisions of a county (113 political subdivisions exist in Orange County). The Operational Area Agreement is the initial step in developing a method to provide for a County-wide unified approach in response to major emergencies or disasters. A primary goal of the Operational Area Agreement is the development of an Operational Area Emergency Plan. The Districts have been invited to participate in the Orange County Operational Area Agreement prepared by the Orange County Emergency Management Council. By entering into the Operational Area Agreement, the Districts will become a contributing member in the development of the Operational Area Emergency Plan. This will enable the Districts to voice it's specific needs and concerns in regard to County-wide emergency response and disaster preparedness. See attached Staff Report. Staff Recommendation Safety and Emergency Response Staff recommends signing the Operational Area Agreement to contribute to the development of the Operational Area Emergency Plan and ensure the unique and specific needs of the Districts are addressed during the implementation of the Standardized Emergency Management System. g:WryVnVunwcli er%9ems_rpl.W COUNTY SANrAnON Dismicrs of ORANGE COUNTY,CAUFORNIA ' I0 ELLIBAVENUE P.O.BOX 8127 October 31, 1995 FOUNTAINVAUE ,CAUPORNIAW2 B12) (714)M-2411 STAFF REPORT Standardized Emergency Management System Operational Area Agreement Summary The Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS) was established in 1992 by Senate Bill (SB) 1841 to provide a framework for responding to and managing emergencies and disasters involving multiple jurisdictions and/or agencies. SB 1841 requires counties to establish an Operational Area (OA) for emergency management by December 1, 1995. The Orange County OA consists of all 113 political subdivisions of the County, including: Cities, Water Districts, Sanitary Districts, Sanitation Districts, Community Services Districts, Transit Authority, School Districts and Department of Education, and Independent Special Districts, hereinafter referred to as Subdivisions. The Districts have been invited to participate in the Orange County Operational Area Agreement (OAA) prepared by the Orange County Emergency Management Council (Council). A fact sheet identifying the salient components of the OAA and the complete OAA have been included (attachments 1 and 2, respectively). As part of SB 1841, the OA and SEMS must be utilized in response to all major emergencies and disasters occurring after December 1, 1996 to be eligible for reimbursement for the personnel costs of emergency response. Discussion The OAA establishes a starting point for the Subdivisions to develop a plan to coordinate, communicate, respond and recover from emergencies and disasters. The approach used by the Council for implementation of SEMS allows all Subdivisions to participate as equals to ensure that the specific emergency needs and resources of each Subdivisions are considered. The OAA is intended to allow all Subdivisions in the County to communicate, act and speak together with one voice to our State and Federal counterparts, in both response and recovery from major emergencies and disasters. It will allow Orange County to compete for emergency resources with other counties and provide the structure to employ those resources where they are most needed. SEMSOAA Page 2 of 2 October 31, 1995 Major goals of the OAA are to develop an Operational Area Emergency Plan (OAEP), OA policies and procedures, and to develop and conduct emergency training and exercises. To accomplish these goals, the Orange County Emergency Management Organization (OCEMO) will be formed, which will consist of members from the Subdivisions. The Districts will have a representative on the OCEMO Representative Board that will assist in the completion of these tasks and ensure the Districts specific needs and resources are addressed. Conclusion The Districts are not required to sign the OAA, however, non-participation in the agreement would most likely place the Districts at the "bottom-of-the-list" for obtaining County resources in the event of a major emergency or disaster. By becoming a signatory member of the OAA, the Districts would be able to contribute to the development of the OAEP and ensure the unique needs of the Districts are addressed. Furthermore, the individual Subdivision's emergency response plans are required to be consistent with SEMS. The Scope of Work for the recently approved project to develop an Integrated Emergency Response Plan has been prepared to be complementary to SEMS and the OAEP. Budoet Information Currently, federal Emergency Management Assistance (EMA) grant funds are available for the OA administration costs. It is estimated that this OA will receive approximately $200,000 in federal funds. In the event EMA grant funds are discontinued, the Executive Board of the Council will be required to ensure the work of the OA is completed, which may require the Districts to pay a percentage of the costs, shared among the 113 Subdivisions. In addition, Safety and Emergency Response staff time will be required, which is expected to be less than 100 hours for the development of the OAEP. Staff Recommendation Safety and Emergency Response Staff recommends signing the OAA to contribute to the development of the OAEP and ensure the unique and specific needs of the Districts are addressed during the implementation of SEMS. Attachments DET:dt 9:WpVvHunnic1 eMams_mt Attachment 1 STANDARDIZED EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM OPERATIONAL AREA AGREEMENT FACT SHEET Operational Area Agreement (OAA). The initial step in developing a method to prepare a County-wide system for responding to major emergencies or disasters. The OAA establishes an Operational Area Council (OAC), Operational Area Executive Board, and the Orange County Emergency Management Organization (OCEMO). The Districts will have representation in OAC and in OCEMO. Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS). A framework for responding to and managing emergencies and disasters involving multiple jurisdictions or multiple agency responses. Operational Area (OA). An organization consisting of all political subdivisions of a county, created to prepare for and coordinate emergency response information, resources, and priorities among local governments within the OA, and serves as the coordination and communication link between the local and regional governments. Operational Area Council. Responsibilities include: • Authority over the major policy issues of the OA. Operational Area Executive Board. Responsibilities include: • Overseeing actions of the OA Manager. • Establishment and implementation of the OA Policies and OA Emergency Plan. • Direct the development of and approve the OA annual operating budget and staffing. • Review and recommend for action mutual aid plans, agreements, ordinances, resolutions, and any rules and regulations necessary to implement such plans and agreements. • Providing advice to the OAC regarding recovery operations. Orange County Emergency Management Organization. Responsibilities include: • Development and maintenance of the OA Emergency Plan. • Development and maintenance of OA operating procedures and Emergency Operations Center guidelines and procedures. • Coordinate an annual OA exercise and coordinate personnel training. • Review, report, and make recommendations on legislation impacting emergency plans and programs. • Review proposals and make recommendations of emergency mutual aid plans and agreements. Administration. The Board of Supervisors is required to formally establish the OA by December 1, 1995, with representation from all Subdivisions. Emergency Management Assistance grant funds of approximately $200,000 will be available from the federal government for the administration of the OA. Attachment 2 OPERATIONAL AREA AGREEMENT OF THE COUNTY OF ORANGE AND POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS October 3, 1995 OPERATIONAL AREA AGREEMENT _ OF THE COUNTY OF ORANGE AND POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS Table of Contents Subiect P22e Recitals I A- Existing Agreements 1 B. Operational Area Established 2 C. City-County Emergency Management Planning Board 2 D. Local Authority 2 E. Definitions 2 F. Operational Area Council, Executive Board and Subcommittees 3 G. Creation and Powers and Duties of Operational Area Coordinator 13 H. Creation and Powers and Duties of Operational Area Manager 15 L Operational Area Emergency Plan 16 J. County Specific Responsibilities 17 K Operational Area Council Member Responsibilities 18 L. Operational Area Expenses and Revenues 19 M. Description, Function and Duties of the Operational Area 20 Emergency Organisation N. Activation of the Operational Area Emergency Operations Center 20 O. Effective Date 23 P. Withdrawal 23 Q. Suspension of Voting Privileges 23 R. Indemnification 23 S. Counterparts 23 T. Amendment 23 U. Notice 24 V. Severability 24 Signatures 24 OPERATIONAL AREA AGREEMENT OF THE COUNTY OF ORANGE AND POLTIICAL SUBDrMIONS THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this day of� 1995, which date is enumerated for purpose of reference only, by and between the County of Orange, hereinafter referred to as"COUNTY," and all other Political Subdivisions within Orange County, as defined in Government Code Section 8557 (c) of The California Emergency Services Act, Government Code Section 8550 et sea., (" The Emergency Services Act' , which are signatories hereto, hereinafter referred to as"SUBDIVISIONS", collectively referred to as the"Parties". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, it is the intent of the Parties hereto, in accordance with The Emergency Services Act and The Standardized Emergency Management System Regulations, Title 19 California Code of Regulations Section 2400 et sea.,to coordinate preparedness and response efforts for the safety of persons and property from the effects of natural, man-made, or war-caused disasters, hereinafter referred to as"emergencies;" and, WHEREAS, the purpose of an Operational Area, as defined in Government Code Section 8605 and Title 19 California Code of Regulations Sections 2403 and 2409, is to manage and coordinate information, resources, and priorities between the COUNTY and all Subdivisions in the geographic area of the County, and to serve'as the coordination and communication link with the regional level of the State; and WHEREAS, the declared purposes of this Agreement are to provide for the establishment and direction of the Operational Area;the cooperative and mutual handling of the duties and responsibilities of the Operational Area lead Agency; the coordination of the emergency functions of the Operational Area with all other public agencies, corporations, organizations, and affected private persons; and the preparation and implementation of plans for the protection of persons and property within the Operational Area in the event of an emergency; and WHEREAS, any expenditures made in connection with such emergency activities, including mutual aid activities, shall be deemed conclusively to be for the direct protection and benefit of the inhabitants and property of the Operational Area. NOW THEREFORE,the Parties hereto agree as follows: A. =TING AGREEMENTS: Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed as superseding or modifying any existing agreements, including mutual aid agreements, except this Agreement supersedes the existing UNIFIED ORANGE COUNTY-CITIES EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT dated July 14, 1 1981; and nothing herein shall be construed as preventing any Party from entering into or modifying mutual aid agreements. B. OPERATIONAL AREA ESTABLISHED: The entire geographic area of Orange County constitutes an Operational Area for the purposes of emergency mitigation, preparedness, response, and recovery, as required by Title 19 California Code of Regulations Section 2409. C. CITY-COUNTY EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLANNING BOARD: For the purposes of COUNTY Ordinance No. 3915 Section 3-1-5 of the Codified Ordinances of the County of Orange, as presently existing or as hereafter amended, the Council created under this Agreement constitutes the City County Emergency Management Planning Board and this Agreement defines its membership, powers, duties, divisions, services and staff. D. LOCAL AUTHORITY: In the event of an actual or threatened emergency, each jurisdiction shall retain the authority provided for by law respecting its jurisdiction. E. DEFINITIONS: The following terms as used in this Agreement shall, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, have the respective meanings herein set forth below: (1) Operational Area Coordinator shall mean that position affiliated with a public agency as designated in Section G of this Agreement, to provide direction and coordination of the Operational Area during times of emergency. (2) Emergency shall mean the actual or threatened existence of conditions of disaster or of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property within the County caused by such conditions as air pollution, civil disturbance, sudden and severe energy shortage, drought, or earthquake or other conditions, the Governor's warning of an earthquake or volcanic prediction, epidemic, fire, flood, hazardous material release, plant or animal infestation or disease, riot, storm, or war or imminent threat of war, but other than conditions resulting from a labor controversy, which conditions are, or are likely to be, beyond the control of the services, personnel, equipment, and facilities of a Subdivision or County, requiring the combined forces of the Operational Area to manage. (3) Unified command shall mean a unified team effort which allows all agencies with, either geographical or functional responsibility, to manage an emergency by establishing a common set of emergency objectives and strategies. This is accomplished without losing or abdicating agency authority, responsibility or accountability. 2 F. OPERATIONAL AREA COUNCIL,EXECUTIVE BOARD AND • SUBCOMMITTEES: (1) Opentional Area Council. Title 19 California Code of Regulations Section 2400 et sea, establishing the Standardized Emergency Management System hereinafter referred to as SEMS, allows the COUNTY and all SUBDIVISIONS to have representation in the Operational Area Therefore, the Operational Area Council, hereinafter referred to as the "Council", is hereby created to include the signature Parties to this Agreement. The Parties acknowledge that the Council is not a separate legal entity and that it is not their intention to form a joint powers authority. a. Membership. All SUBDIVISIONS in the County of Orange, including cities, school and special districts, and the COUNTY, by approval and execution of this Agreement, are members of the Council. Each Council Member shall designate a representative and an alternate from its governing body to serve as it's representative b. Responsibilities. The members of the Council shall have authority over the major policy issues of the Operational Area, as determined by the Executive Board, including the adoption of and amendments to this Agreement and adoption of any Operational Area fees. However, whenever a majority of all members of the Council determine that an issue should be brought before the Council, it shall be done so irrespective of the fact that the Executive Board has failed to identify it as a major policy issue as set forth in the first sentence of this subsection. It is not the intent of this Agreement that there be regular meetings of the Council. The Executive Board shall submit major Operational Area policy issues to Council members for consideration at their respective goveming body meetings. The approval by a majority of the governing bodies of all Council members shall be sufficient for adoption of any Operational Area business, including the amendment of this Agreement, and adoption of any Operational Area fees. a Representatives Meeting. Should it be necessary for the Council to meet, the representative or alternate of each member of the Council, shall be entitled to one vote. The representatives present shall, by majority vote, select a Chair Pro Tem from among the representatives present. A majority of all representatives of the members of the Council shall constitute a quorum for the ' transaction of business relating to the Operational Area Unless otherwise provided herein, a vote of the majority of those present 3 and qualified to vote shall be sufficient for the adoption of any motion, resolution or order and to take any other action deemed appropriate to carry forward the objectives of the Operational Area. In the event a tie vote occurs, in order to break the tie, the vote of the Chair Pro Tem shall not be counted. The representatives of the Council may meet as necessary as determined by the Executive Board or as requested by a majority of the members of the Council. (2) Operational Area Executive Board. a. Creation of the Operational Area Executive Board. The Council shall have an Executive Board, hereinafter referred to as Executive Board, consisting of eleven voting members. 1) Members. Members are as follows: a) A member of the COUNTY Board of Supervisors b) A representative from the Orange County City Engineers' and Public Works Directors' Association c) The Orange County Fire&Rescue Mutual Aid Coordinator d) A representative from the Orange County Fire Chiefs' Association e) The Orange COUNTY Sheriff-Coroner-Law Enforcement Mutual Aid Coordinator f) A representative from Independent Special Districts of Orange County g) A representative from the Orange COUNTY Health Care Agency-Health Care Mutual Aid Coordinator h) A representative from the Orange County Police Chiefs' and Sheriff Association i) A representative selected jointly from the Orange County-City Manager's Association and the League of Cities. 4 j) A representative selected jointly by the Orange County Superintendent of Schools, Community Colleges and School Districts k) A representative from the COUNTY Environmental Management Agency-Public Works Mutual Aid Coordinator 2) Terms, Alternates and Voting. Executive Board members shall be appointed by their respective organimtion every two years and shall serve at the discretion of their organization for two years. An alternate shall also be designated to serve the same term for each Executive Board member appointed. Each Executive Board member, or alternate in the absence of any voting member, shall be entitled to one vote. A majority of the Executive Board shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business relating to the Operational Area Unless otherwise provided herein, a vote of the majority of those present and qualified to vote shall be sufficient for the adoption of any motion, resolution or order and to take any other action deemed appropriate to carry forward the objectives of the Operational Area In the event a tie vote occurs, in order to break the tie, the vote of the Chair shall not be counted. 3) Operational Area Executive Board Chair and Vice- Chair. The Chair and Vice Chair shall be elected every two years by the Executive Board. In the absence of both the Chair and the Vice Chair, the members of the Executive Board present shall, by majority vote, select one of the members present to act as Chair Pro Tem. 4) Meetings. The Executive Board shall meet quarterly or as designated by the Executive Board Chair. b. Responsibilitim/Policy/Advisory Duties. The Executive Board shall have responsibility for the overseeing the actions of the Operational Area Manager in the daily operations and administration of the Operational Area The Executive Board shall also have responsibility for the development, establishment and implementation of the policies of the Operational Area, and shall keep the Council informed of its actions. The Executive Board shall determine which major policy issues of the Operational Area issues require Council members' approval and shall seek such approval. However, whenever a majority of all members of the 5 Council determine that an issue should be brought before the entire Council, it shall be done so irrespective of the fact that the Executive Board has failed to identify it as a major policy issue as - set forth in this subsection. 1) Policy and Operational Area Emergency Plan. The Executive Board is responsible for the establishment of Operational Area policy and the development and implementation by December 1, 1996, of the Operational Area Emergency Plan, including mitigation, preparation, response and recovery, and for the ongoing exercise and maintenance of the plan as required by SEMS. 2) Operational Area Budget and Operating Staff. The Executive Board shall have the responsibility to direct the development of and approve the Operational Area annual operating budget and staffing utilizing resources made available to the Operational Area by the State Office of Emergency Services through the Federal Emergency Management Assistance Program, and to monitor the expenditures of the Operational Area This shall include the responsibility to seek grants from other sources to sustain the preparedness and response efforts of the Operational Area as further detailed in Section L of this Agreement, and, if necessary, to recommend for adoption by the members of the Council, any Operational Area fees to sustain the Operational Area In the event the Executive Board recommends adoption-of fees, the Executive Board shall be responsible for directing the development of and submitting the Operational Area annual budget and staffing to the members of the Council for approval. 3) Laws,Rules,Legislation and Regulations. The Executive Board shall review and recommend for action or adoption by the members of the Council, emergency and mutual aid plans, agreements, ordinances, resolutions, and any rules and regulations necessary to implement such plans and agreements. The Executive Board shall also study, review, and make recommendations on State and Federal legislation and policy as appropriate, and on matters referred to it in writing by Council members. 4) Recovery Operations. During the recovery phase of an ' emergency, the Executive Board shall provide advice to the members of the Council regarding rebuilding and cost 6 recovery. The Executive Board shall direct the Operational Area Manager, as designated in Section H of this Agreement, to coordinate with the State Office of Emergency Services as needed in this process. 5) Successor to the Operations Coordinator. Due to the changing circumstances and requirements of emergencies, especially in transition from the response to and recovery from an emergency, the Executive Board is hereby given authority to appoint an Operational Area Coordinator to succeed the initial response Operational Area Coordinator designated pursuant to Section G(1) of this Agreement. e Subcommittees and Technical Advisory Groups. 1) Establishment,Support and Coordination. The Executive Board may establish standing and ad hoc Subcommittees and Technical Advisory Groups to complete its.work and to ensure communication and coordination between all interested persons or groups, including but not limited to the COUNTY, SUBDIVISIONS, Orange County Emergency Management Organization, Communications Systems, Transportation, Care and Shelter. Subcommittees and.Technical Advisory Groups may each elect a Chairperson and shall provide appropriate staff support from their members. The Operational Area Manager shag provide coordination between these Subcommittees-or Technical Advisory Groups and the Executive Board only. 2) OCEMO. There is hereby established a standing Subcommittee to the Executive Board, the Orange County Emergency Management Organization, hereinafter referred to as"OCEMO". All Council members shall be expected to participate in OCEMO, to the maximum extent possible, with the understanding that the cooperative establishment of the Operational Area Plan, policies and procedures, training and exercises is necessary to ensure that the Operational Area Plan, policies, procedures, training and exercises meet the emergency needs of the SUBDIVISIONS, COUNTY, and Operational Area 7 a) Members. 1. Standing Members. Standing members - include the emergency services coordinators designated annually in writing to the Operational Area Manager by each Party which is a signatory to this Agreement. The COUNTY Emergency Manager shall be the COUNTY Standing member. 2. Approved Members. Designated representatives from other public, non-profit and private emergency response, recovery and management agencies may actively participate as approved members in OCEMO Committees. These agencies may include: Orange County Disaster Recovery Alliance, Volunteer Agencies Active In Disasters, American Red Cross, Volunteer Emergency Preparedness Organization, utilities, military bases, universities and colleges, and the State Office of Emergency Services. Membership shall be granted by the Executive Board annually, upon recommendation made by majority vote of standing members of OCEMO. 3. Associate Members. Members of other organizations may participate as non-voting Associate members. b) Voting. Each of the Standing and Approved members shall be entitled to one vote. The Representative Board shall determine the issues which require approval of the voting members of OCEMO. However, whenever a majority of all members of OCEMO determine that an issue should be brought before the entire OCEMO membership, it shall be done so irrespective of the fact that the Representative Board has failed to identify it as an issue. It is not the intent of this Agreement that there be regular meetings of OCEMO. Any member of OCEMO may attend and be heard at the Representative Board meetings and participate in Representative Board committees. The Chair may 8 convene a meeting of OCEMO and/or conduct a vote by proxy. Unless otherwise provided herein, a vote of the majority of those qualified to vote shall _ be sufficient for the adoption of any motion, resolution or order and to take any other action deemed appropriate to carry forward the objectives of the Operational Area. c) Chair and Vice-Chairs. The Chair, First and Second Vice Chair shall be elected annually by the Representative Board and shall serve both as the officers of the Representative Board and OCEMO. In the event a tie vote occurs, the vote of the Char shall not be counted. In the absence of all officers, the members of the Representative Board present shall, by majority vote, select one of the members present to act as Chair Pro Tem. d) Representative Board. OCEMO shall have a Representative Board, hereinafter referred to as `Representative Board'. I. Membership. The membership of the Representative Board shall be comprised of the following standing members: a. The COUNTY Emergency Manager/ Operational Area Manager b. The Cities' Emergency Services Coordinators C. One representative selected jointly by the Orange County Superintendent of Schools, Community Colleges and School Districts d. One representative selected jointly by the Water and Irrigation Districts e. A representative from the Orange County Transportation Authority 9 f. One representative selected jointly by the Sanitation Districts g. One representative selected jointly by the Sanitary Districts h. A representative from the Parks and Recreation District i. A representative selected jointly by the Library Districts j. A representative from the Cemetery District k. A representative from the Vector Control District 1. A representative from the Storm District in. A representative selected jointly by the Community Services Districts 2. Voting. Each of the Representative Board members shall be entitled to one vote. A majority of the Representative Board shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business relating to OCEMO. Unless otherwise provided herein, a vote of the majority of those present and qualified to vote shall be sufficient for the adoption of any motion, resolution or order and to take any other action deemed appropriate to carry forward the objectives of the Operational Area. 3. Committees. The Representative Board may establish Committees to accomplish the OCEMO duties. All OCEMO members are expected to participate in the Committees to the maximum extent possible. 10 e) Executive Council. The OCEMO Executive Council shall consist of the OCEMO Chair, Fast and Second Vice Chair, the immediate past Chair, and the COUNTY Emergency Manager/Operational Area Manager. The Executive Council may meet at the request of the Chair to develop agendas and plans, and to analyze issues to be presented to the OCEMO Representative Board. f) Staff Support. The COUNTY shall provide support to the OCEMO Representative Board for agendas and minutes only. Staff support to OCEMO Committees shall be provided by OCEMO members. g) Purpose. As a Subcommittee responsible to the Executive Board, the purposes of OCEMO include the following: 1. Operational Area Plan. Development and maintenance of the Operational Area Emergency Plan as described in SEMS and approved by the Executive Board. 2. Standard Operating Procedures. Development and maintenance of Operational Area standard operating procedures and Operational Area Emergency Operations Center procedures and guidelines for use during emergencies, reviewed and approved by the Operational Area Mutual Aid Coordinators. 3. Emergency Training and Exercises. Coordinate an annual Operational Area exercise as required by SEMS and coordinate training of personnel who are part of the Operational Area Emergency Organization. 4. Efficiency and Effectiveness. Identify, examine and develop plans and programs of concern to all SUBDIVISIONS and the ' COUNTY, and coordinate the development of appropriate plans and programs leading 11 toward an integrated Operational Area approach to preparedness for emergencies, including use of cost efficient and effective, coordinated public education and individual emergency preparedness programs. 5. Legislation. Review and report on legislation impacting emergency plans and programs and propose concepts for new legislation for consideration by the Executive Board. 6. Plans and Agreements. Review proposals of emergency mutual aid plans and agreements and make recommendations on approval of such proposals to the Executive Board. 7. After Action Reports. Develop after action reports for the Executive Board, following emergencies in which the Operational Area is activated. S. Other. Other duties ead responsibilities as delegated by the Executive Board. h) Meetings. The Representative Board shall meet every other month. Special meetings of the Representative Board may be called by the Chair. Committees shall meet twice a month until the Operational Area Emergency Plan and procedures, exercise schedule and training, as required by SEMS are completed, and as necessary thereafter. i) Finances. OCEMO has no authority to bind the COUNTY or any SUBDIVISION to any financial arrangement. d. Operational Area Executive Board Emergency Advisory Capacity. The Executive Board may be convened by the Chair to review the potential or actual emergency situation and make and receive appropriate recommendations from the Operational Area ' Coordinator, as designated below, and Council members. 12 G. CREATION AND POWERS AND DUTIES OF OPERATIONAL AREA COORDINATOR (1) Operational Area Coordinator. By this Agreement, Council designates an Operational Area Coordinator, hereinafter referred to as "Coordinator". Based on the type of disaster described below, the initial response Coordinator shall be the incumbent of the position designated below: a. Law Enforcement Mutual Aid Coordinator. The Law Enforcement Mutual Aid Coordinator is designated as the initial response Coordinator for emergencies where evacuation, law and order are of the highest priority as related to earthquake, tsunami, nuclear power plant emergency, civil disturbance, terrorism, or act of war. b. Fire and Rescue Mutual Aid Coordinator. The Fire and Rescue Mutual Aid Coordinator is designated as the initial response Coordinator for emergencies where the life or safety of the public is threatened due to fire, mass casualty emergency, or hnzarrdous materials release. C. Public Works Mutual Aid Coordinator. The Public Works Mutual Aid Coordinator is designated as the initial response Coordinator for emergencies where public works, or environmental protection resources shall be the primary method used for mitigation and recovery such as during flood storm, dam failure or oil spill. d. Health Care Mutual Aid Coordinator. The Health Care Mutual Aid Coordinator is designated as the as the initial response Coordinator for emergencies where there is a threat of an epidemic or a declared epidemic. e. Alternates to the Operational Area Coordinator. Each incumbent of a position eligible to act as the initial response Coordinator shall annually designate, in writing by name and in order of succession, a minimum of two alternates. This designation shall be filed with the Operational Area Manager as described in Section H of this Agreement, no later than July 1st of each year. f. Line of Succession. In the event that neither the designated initial response Coordinator nor either of the designated alternates is available to serve in the capacity of the initial response ' Coordinator, the following line of succession shall be used to 13 ensure continuity of Operational Area operations during times of emergency: 1) Law Enforcement Mutual Aid Coordinator and two designated akemates. 2) Fire and Rescue Mutual Aid Coordinator and two designated alternates. 3) Public Works Mutual Aid Coordinator, and two designated alternates. 4) Health Care Agency Mutual Aid Coordinator and two designated alternates. (2) Unified Command and Joint Operational Area Coordinator. Where appropriate, the Coordinator shall use a unified command, which is standard procedure for emergencies which involve multiple jurisdictions or professional disciplines. (3) Successor to the Initial Response Operations Coordinator. Due to the changing circumstances and requirements of emergencies, especially in transition from the response to and recovery from an emergency, the Executive Board is hereby given authority to appoint.successor Operational Area Coordinator(s) to succeed the initial response Operational Area Coordinator designated pursuant to Section G(1) of this Agreement. The successor Coordinator(s) shall have the same powers and duties as the initial response Coordinator, as specified in Section G(4) of this Agreement. (4) Powers and Duties. The Coordinator shall direct and coordinate the Operational Area during times of emergency. The Coordinator shall have the following duties and powers: a. Direction and Coordination. Serve as key decision maker, in the Operational Area Emergency Operations Center providing direction and coordination necessary to accomplish the purposes of this Agreement and responsibilities of the Operational Area Lead as specified in Title 19 California Code of Regulations Section 2409 (e). b. Operational Area Representative. Represent the Operational Area in all dealings with the public or private agencies on matters pertaining to emergencies as defined herein. _ 14 c Emergency Public Information. Appoint a Public Information Officer to coordinate the dissemination of all emergency information, press releases, and public statements, to prevent conflicting information, misinformation, and the initiation of rumors, as appropriate to the type of emergency confronting the Operational Area. d. Emergency Proclamations. Each SUBDMSION shall retain the powers and responsibilities grunted by law to proclaim an emergency in its jurisdiction, according to procedures set forth by the jurisdiction. The COUNTY Board of Supervisors shall retain the powers and responsibilities granted by law to proclaim an emergency in the County geographic area, according to procedures set forth in COUNTY Ordinance No. 3915 Section 3-1-6 of the Codified Ordinances of the County of Orange and COUNTY Board of Supervisors Resolution 95-386, as presently existing or as hereafter amended. H. CREATION OF POSITION AND POWERS AND DUTIES OF OPERATIONAL AREA MANAGER: (1) Operational Area Manager. The position of the Operational Area Manager is hereby created. The Operational Area Manager shall be the COUNTY Emergency Manager as specified by COUNTY Ordinance No. 3915, Section 3-1fi of the Codified Ordinances of the County of Orange and COUNTY Board of Supervisors Resolution 95-386, as presently existing or as hereafter amended. (2) Powers and Duties. The Operational Area Manager shall have the following powers and duties: a Staff to the Operational Area Executive Board- Serve as staff to the Executive Board, maintain close liaison with the Executive Board, and coordinate all activities of assigned Operational Area staff with the Executive Board. b. Daily Coordination and Assistance. Direct the daily coordination and cooperation between the Operational Area staff and the Operational Area Emergency Organization, and Executive Board Subcommittees, including OCEMO. Resolve questions of authority and responsibility that may arise between them, and work closely with and assist the Executive Board, as required. ' 15 C. Emergency Operations Center Maintenance. Maintain the Operational Area Emergency Operations Center in a constant state of readiness, providing staff as needed to support the Emergency ' Operations Center operations during times of emergency in order to coordinate emergency information between the COUNTY and all SUBDIVISIONS, state and federal agencies, and volunteer organs=ons. d. Notification of Emergency Operation Center Activation. Notify the Executive Board and Board of Supervisors of an Emergency Operations Center activation as soon as practical, and keep the Executive Board and Board of Supervisors informed on all aspects of a current emergency situation as soon as information becomes available. e. OCEMO Support. Provide support to the OCEMO Representative Board for agendas and minutes only. Staff support to OCEMO Committees shall be provided by OCEMO members. f. Budget and Staffing. Develop an annual operating budget and staffing recommendations and monitor the Operational Area expenditures at the direction of and for the approval of the Executive Board g. After Action Reports. Coordinate with OCEMO the development of after action reports for the Executive Board, following emergencies in which the Operational Area is activated. L OPERATIONAL AREA EMERGENCY PLAN: Under the direction of the Executive Board, OCEMO shall be responsible for ensuring the development and maintenance of the Operational Area Emergency Plan, which shall provide for the effective mobilization of all of the resources of the Operational Area, both public and private, to meet any condition constituting an emergency; and shall provide for the organisation, powers and duties, and staff of the Operational Area Emergency Organization as described in Section M of this Agreement. (1) Compliance. The Operational Area Emergency Plan shall comply with applicable local, state and federal planning criteria, analyze the risks faced by the Operational Area, assign functional responsibilities to Mutual aid organizations, COUNTY agencies/departments, SUBDIVISIONS, and personnel, and assign lines of succession for the members of the Operational Area Emergency Organization. 16 (2) Functional assignments. The Operational Area Emergency Plan shall include the functions assigned to the mutual aid organizations, COUNTY agencies/departments and SUBDIVISIONS, and it shall be the responsibility of the agency/department heads and SUBDIVISIONS to appoint coordinators who shall report to the Emergency Operations Center and carry out the assigned duties as appropriate. (3) Adoption. The Emergency Plan shall not be effective until adopted by the Executive Board and a majority of all Council members. J. COUNTY SPECIFIC RESPONSIBI1=S. The COUNTY shall act as the Operational Area Lead Agency. The Operational Area Lead Agency shall have the following responsibilities to the Operational Area in addition to those member responsibilities specified under Section K of this Agreement, (1) 24 Hour Contact Point The COUNTY shall provide the 24 hour contact point for the Operational Area and act as lead in activating the Operational Area Emergency Operations Center, hereinafter referred to as"OAEOC". (2) Operational Area Emergency Operations Center. The COUNTY Emergency Operations Center located at 2644 Santiago Canyon Road, in Silverado, California and Alternate Emergency Operations Center, as designated, shall serve as the OAEOC. (3) Initial EOC Activation Staling. The COUNTY shall provide initial OAEOC activation staff. SUBDIVISIONS with available resources shall provide secondary and relief OAEOC staffing. (4) EOC Maintenance. COUNTY Emergency Management staff shall be responsible for ensuring the OAEOC is maintained in a state of constant readiness. (5) Operational Area Council Executive Board Support The COUNTY shall provide support to the Executive Board for agendas and minutes for meetings and coordinating follow up only. Staff support to Subcommittees and Technical Advisory Groups shall be provided by Council members and their representatives. (6) OCEMO Support The COUNTY shall provide support to the OCEMO Representative Board for agendas and minutes only. Staff support to OCEMO Committees shall be provided by OCEMO members. 17 K OPERATIONAL AREA COUNCIL MEMBER RESPONSIBIlTSIES: Members of the Operational Area Council shall have the responsibilities asset forth below: (1) Participation. Actively participate as a member in the Council, Executive Board if designated, Subcommittees and Technical Advisory Groups including OCEMO, and in the Operational Area Emergency Organization, including providing staff to support the work of the Executive Board, Subcommittees and Technical Advisory Groups. (2) Emergency Plan and Organization. Maintain an emergency plan and organization to provide for the emergency needs in the SUBDIVISION according to SEMS, and coordinate with and, where able, support other SUBDIVISIONS, the COUNTY, and the OAEOC. (3) Emergency Management Program. Develop an emergency management program which shall provide for the needs of the SUBDIVISION, which shall be complementary to and compatible and coordinated with the needs of the Operational Area in the event of an emergency. (4) Emergency Assistance. Provide assistance during an emergency: a. Capabilities and Agreements. SUBDIVISIONS shall offer assistance within the limits of capabilities and according to applicable mutual aid agreements. b. EOC Staffing. SUBDIVISIONS with available resources shall provide secondary and relief OAEOC staffing. (5) Resource list. Maintain a current resource listing of the facilities, equipment and supplies available in the jurisdiction for use in the event of an emergency. (6) Cooperation. Promote cooperation among all SUBDIVISIONS in order to improve the overall Operational Area emergency management program. (7) Training and Exercises. Assure training and exercises within the SUBDIVISION and Operational Area, maintain a thorough knowledge of the Operational Area Emergency Plan and ensure that the supporting services and key personnel are properly trained and organized to meet all of their responsibilities in the event of an emergency. 18 (8) Emergency Notifications. Ensure that internal and Operational Area emergency notification lists are kept current. (9) Procedures. Develop SUBDIVISION procedures which outline the steps necessary to complete tasks as a member of the Operational Area. (10) Critical Personnel. Identify at least two alternates for each person deemed critical to SUBDMSION and Operational Area operations, either to serve in the capacity of the primary contact when (s)he is not available, or to facilitate 24 hour operation when needed in times of emergency. L OPERATIONAL AREA EXPENSES AND REVENUES (1) Minimum costs/etticiency. All costs shall be kept to a minimum, and efficiencies in use of staff; materials, etc. shall be a priority. (2) Costs of Operational Area EOC Emergency Activation. The COUNTY declares its willingness to provide the Operational Area 24 hour contact point, the OAEOC and initial OAEOC staffing, and to activate the OAEOC as required by SEMS as set forth in Section N(4) of this Agreement. The COUNTY shall exercise prudence in the staffing and level of activation, and shall deactivate the OAEOC when requested by SUBDIVISION(s) or as soon as practical, as allowed by law. The COUNTY is to act as a member-of the Operational Area only and shall not be solely responsible for the costs of activating the OAEOC. The Executive Board shall be responsible for the development of policy and procedures similar to other mutual aid agreements where in SUBDIVISION(s) requiring activation of the OAEOC shall be responsible for reimbursement of the COUNTY and other SUBDIVISIONS for the cost of activation, if the COUNTY does not activate the OAEOC for its use, and cannot legally declare an emergency for the purposes of reimbursement from the State or Federal governments. (3) Opeational Area Administrative Expenses. The Executive Board shall be responsible for acquisition and distribution of Emergency Management Assistance grant funds, and any other funds, to cover the administrative costs of the Operational Area, including any reimbursement to the COUNTY for services requested of the COUNTY pursuant to this subsection. The Executive Board shall be responsible for determining the potential source of and for acquiring funds or staff time to match the grant(s). The COUNTY shall provide administrative staffing for the Operational Area, as determined by the Executive Board and/or Council in the annual budget, to carry out the duties as delineated in Section H of this Agreement. The COUNTY is to act as a member of the Operational Area 19 (4) Emergency Expenses. During emergencies, all Parties shall be expected to participate, according to mutual aid and other agreements, and to the maximum extent possible, with the understanding that during an emergency the priority is life, safety, property and the environment, regardless of which jurisdiction is impacted. (5) Emergency Aid to Parties. Nothing herein shall be construed to restrict or control any Parry's right or ability to apply for or receive emergency aid, loans or grants from any source including the State and Federal government. Neither any Parry nor the Operational Area shall have any claim upon or interest in any emergency aid funds obtained by any other Parry for it's emergency expenses, with the exception that SUBDMSIONS may be responsible for reimbursement of OAEOC activation costs as set forth in Section (L) of this Agreement. M. DESCRIPTION, FUNCTION AND DUTIES OF THE OPERATIONAL AREA EMERGENCY ORGANIZATION (1) Description. All officers and employees of the Parties, together with those volunteer forces enrolled to aid them during an emergency, and all groups, organizations, and persons who may by agreement or operation of law, including persons pressed into service under the provisions of COUNTY Ordinance No. 3915 Section 3-1-6 of the Codified Ordinances of the County of Orange as presently existing or as hereafter amended, shall constitute the Operational Area Emergency Organization, and shall be charged with duties incidental to the protection of life and property in the Operational Area during times of emergency. (2) Functions and Duties. The functions and duties of the Operational Area Emergency Organization shall be distributed among such Mutual aid organizations, COUNTY agencies/departments, SUBDIVISIONS, and staff as the Operational Area Emergency Plan shall prescribe. The form of the organization, titles and terminology shall conform to SEMS. N. ACTIVATION OF THE OPERATIONAL AREA EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER (1) Location. The COUNTY Emergency Operations Center located at 2644 Santiago Canyon Rd., Silvemdo, California, or alternate as designated, shall serve as the OAEOC. Communication connection to the OAEOC shall be the responsibility of each SUBDIVISION and Mutual aid Coordinator or their representative. 20 (2) Virtual Operational Area EOC The OAEOC shall be used as the communication and coordination center and in so far as possible, function as a virtual OAEOC, utilizing any available telecommunication resources so that Parties may communicate without collocation. However, to ensure communication, it may be necessary for representatives and any support staff they may require to be present at the OAEOC. SUBDMSIONS not present shall be responsible for establishing direct contact with the OAEOC. (3) Staff for the Operational Area Emergency Operations Center a. OAEOC Maintenance. COUNTY Emergency Management staff shall be responsible for ensuring the OAEOC is maintained in a state of constant readiness. b. Initial Activation and Beyond_ The COUNTY shall provide initial OAEOC activation staff. SUBDMSIONS with available resources shall provide secondary and relief OAEOC staffing. emergency management or other mutual aid shall be used to staff the OAEOC as necessary. c. Mutual Aid Coordinators. Mutual Aid Coordinators may be present in the OAEOC, but if not present, shall be responsible for establishing direct contact with the OAEOC.. (4) Required Activation: a. Support to Emergency. The Operational Area functions as support to the local government and field response and does not command the emergency response directly. b. Conditions. Activation of the OAEOC is required by SEMS, Title 19 California Code of Regulations Section 2409 (0, under the following conditions: 1) On Request "A local government within the Operational Area has activated its EOC and requested activation of the Operational Area to support their emergency operations." 2) Two City Local Emergency. "Two or more cities within the Operational Area have declared or proclaimed a local emergency." 21 3) COUNTY and City Local Emergency. "The County and one or more cities have declared or proclaimed a local _ emergency." 4) Request for Governor's Proclamation. "A city, city and County, or County has requested a governor's proclamation of a state of emergency, as defined in Government Code 8558(b)." 5) State of Emergency. "A state of emergency is proclaimed by the governor for the County or two or more cities within the Operational Area" 6) Request for Outside Resources. "The Operational Area is requesting resources from outside its boundaries, except those resources used in normal day-today operations which are obtained through existing agreements providing for the exchange or furnishing of certain types of facilities and services on a reimbursable, exchange, or other basis as provided for under the Master Mutual Aid Agreement." 7) Request for Operational Area Resources. "The Operational Area has received resource requests from outside its boundaries, except those resources used in normal day-today operations which are obtained through existing agreements providing for the exchange or furnishing of certain types of facilities and services on a reimbursable, exchange, or other basis as provided for under the Master Mutual Aid Agreement." c Activation Levels. The OAEOC activation levels are described below: 1) Activation Level Ono. Level One shall mean activation of the OAEOC at a minimum level with COUNTY emergency management staff to prepare the OAEOC and notify the Operational Area Emergency Organization and coordinate information among the members of the Operational Area and with Regional State officials as required by SEMS. 2) Activation Level Two. Level Two shall mean partial activation of the OAEOC, staffed by the Operational Area Coordinator or alternate, COUNTY emergency management personnel, along with personnel from COUNTY agencies/departments and other personnel. - 22 selected to meet the functional needs of the emergency Operational Area Emergency Organization during times of emergency. 3) Activation Level Three. Level Three shall mean hill activation of the OAEOC, including all personnel as indicated at level two plus the Executive Board, who shall serve as the Policy Group to advise the Coordinator on the use of resources in response to the disaster, establish policies, rules and regulations regarding the disaster and the subsequent recovery operations, and prioritize resources to effectively mitigate the disaster. O. EFFECTIVE DATE: This Agreement shall become effective upon the approval and execution by the COUNTY Board of Supervisors and at least one SUBDMSION. Any SUBDIVISION in Orange County may become a Parry hereto by executing this Agreement. Notice shall be provided to the COUNTY upon a SUBMISION's execution of this Agreement as indicated in Section T of this Agreement P. WITHDRAWAL: Any Party may withdraw from this Agreement by Providing written notice to the COUNTY. Said notice shall be given 30 days before withdrawal from this Agreement Q. SUSPENSION OF VOTING PRIVILEGES: In the event Operational Area fees are adopted, a Parry's failure to pay said fees within 60 days after said fees become due, shall result in the immediate suspension of that Parry's voting privileges in matters considered by any body, board, subcommittee, committee, or group established by this Agreement. Voting privileges shall be restored upon payment. R. INDEMNIFICATION: Each Party shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the other Parties, and their officers, agents, employees and representatives from any and all losses, liability, damages, claims, suits, actions, administrative proceedings, demands, and litigation, and all expenses and costs relating to acts or omissions of the indemnitor, its officers, agents, employees, or representatives arising out of or incidental to performance under this Agreement. No Parry assumes liability for the acts or omissions of persons other than that Parry's respective of5cers, agents, employees or representatives. S. COUNTERPARTS: This Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, and all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument. T. AMENDMENT: This Agreement may not be amended or modified except in a writing executed by a majority of all Parties. 23 U. NOTICE: Notice to members shall be deemed given when mailed to theta, first class, postage prepaid or faxed to the address or fax number set out by their signatures. V. SEVERABILITY: Should any part, term or provision of this Agreement be determined by a court to be illegal or unenforceable, the remaining portions or provisions of this Agreement shall nevertheless be carried into effect. IN WITNESS WBIMOF,the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement. DATED: COUNTY OF ORANGE, a political sub- division of the State of California By Chairman of the Board of Supervisors SIGNED AND CERTIFIED THAT A COPY OF THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN DELIVERED TO THE CHAII2MAN OF THE BOARD: Kathleen Goodno . Acting Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Orange County, California NOTICE TO THE COUNTY OF ORANGE TO BE GIVEN TO: Loletta M_ Barrett, Emergency Manager 2644 Santiago Canyon Rd. Silverado, CA 92676-9719 FAX: (714) 834-7354 APPROVED AS TO FORM: Lawrence M. Watson Chief Assistant County Council By Ann E. Fletcher, Deputy Dated: 24 OPERATIONAL AREA AGREEMENT OF THE COUNTY OF ORANGE AND POLITICAL SIIBDIVLSIONS THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into, to be effective this _day of 1995, by: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. I OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA for itself and on behalf of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California SIGNATURE BLOCK: By Chairman, Board of Directors By Secretary, Board of Directors APPROVED AS TO FORM: THOMAS L. WOORDRUFF By NOTICE TO BE GIVEN TO: Terri Josway County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 FAX: (714) 962-0427 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 15, 1995 Agenda Item (1 S): Consideration of the following actions relative to introduction of proposed Ordinance No. 128, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Providing for an Early Retirement Incentive Program by Granting Additional Service Credit to Eligible Districts' Employees as authorized by the County Employees' Retirement Law of 1937, Government Code Section 31641.04 (FAHR95-24): (a) Verbal report of General Counsel (b) Consideration of roll call vote motion approving the program and authorizing District No. 1 to enact an Ordinance implementing the program. (c) Consideration of motion to read said Ordinance No. 128 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). (d) Consideration of motion to introduce Ordinance No. 128 and pass to second reading at the December 13, 1995 Board Meeting. Summary On March 8, 1995, the Boards adopted Resolution 95-19, which implemented the early retirement incentive provisions of Government Code Section 31641.04 for certain Maintenance Department employees. Five employees elected to participate in the program during the period March 1, 1995 through April 30, 1995, facilitating a major reorganization of the Department. The retirement incentive was again offered during the period May 1, 1995 through June 30, 1995. Two employees elected to participate at that time. Again, this resulted in an enhanced ability for us to bring about organizational change through accelerated attrition and promotion. At least five employees have currently expressed strong interest in early retirement. A significant benefit would once more be realized through the accelerated attrition and opportunity to introduce new perspectives should these individuals have an opportunity to exercise the early retirement option. Staff Recommendation That the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee approve the extension of the early retirement incentive program. Executive Committee Recommendation to the Joint Boards of Directors That the Joint Boards of Directors approve the program and authorize District No. 1 to enact an Ordinance implementing the program. J IWPMRRSAGBSWOVP+,IB.LYR COUNTY SANrfA11oN DIS minis d ORANGE COGNW,CAUMM A 1G3N EWSAVENUE P.O.BOX 81V FOUMAIN VALLEY,CAnF01WIA YlRAE1Tl November 2, 1995 STAFF REPORT EARLY RETIREMENT INCENTIVE PROGRAM DISCUSSION On March 8, 1995, the Boards adopted Resolution 95-19, which implemented the early retirement incentive provisions of Government Code Section 31641.04. This resolution allowed the addition of two years service credit to certain employees in the Maintenance Department otherwise eligible to retire who actually applied for retirement during the period March 1, 1995 through April 30, 1995. Five employees elected to participate in the program, allowing a major reorganization of the Maintenance Department to occur earlier than would have otherwise been possible. That reorganization has thus far resulted in a cost savings of$207,610 over a six month period, or almost double the initial estimate. The retirement incentive was again offered during the period May 1 through June 30, 1995. Two employees took advantage of that offer, which enhanced our ability to bring about organizational change through accelerated attrition and promotion. The cost savings to date attributable to these retirements is $45,662 due to one of the positions remaining vacant and the other being filled at a lower level. Staff continues to believe that District-wide encouragement of accelerated attrition will have a positive effect on the organizational change sought by the Boards and Districts' Management, and will provide a forceful means of achieving that objective. The potential effect of the early retirement incentive program on motivating organizational change, when coupled with other activities that are now occurring, is significant. While the clear cost savings associated with the earlier Maintenance Department reorganization may not be repeated, added cost, if any, will be mitigated by holding positions vacant for approximately six months subsequent to the retirement in addition to the increased organizational efficiencies that will result. At least five employees have currently expressed strong interest in early retirement. A significant benefit would once more be realized through the accelerated attrition and opportunity to introduce new perspectives should these individuals have an opportunity to exercise the early retirement option. a FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCE COMMITTEE Page 2 November 2, 1995 STAFF RECOMMENDATION 1. Based on the above, staff recommends that the Finance, Administration and Human Resource Committee support a Board Ordinance adopting the provisions of Government Code Section 31641.04 authorizing all eligible Districts employees to receive two years additional service credit for retirement purposes. 2. The Ordinance should specify that provisions of the Early Retirement Incentive Program would be effective January 1 through March 30, 1995 and that the total cost savings of positions filled at a lower level or held vacant for a period of time shall exceed the total actuarial cost of the additional service credit granted and associated paid leave payoff costs. 3. For a period of five years, or until such time as the full actuarially determined cost is paid to OCERS, the Districts' Controller will conduct an annual postaudit to verify that the savings exceed the actuarial and associated costs attributable to the additional service credit, and report the findings of that audit to the Finance, Administration and Human Resource Committee. The first report will will be presented during the fourth quarter of FY '96. /gh Originator: Gary Hasenstab ORDINANCE NO. 128 PROVIDING ADDITIONAL SERVICE CREDIT TO ELIGIBLE DISTRICTS' EMPLOYEES WHO RETIRE EARLY AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR AN EARLY RETIREMENT INCENTIVE PROGRAM BY GRANTING ADDITIONAL SERVICE CREDIT TO ELIGIBLE DISTRICTS' EMPLOYEES AS AUTHORIZED BY THE COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT LAW OF 1937, GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 31641.04. WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 adopted Joint Resolution No. 95-19 and Joint Resolution No. 95-53 approving an Early Retirement Incentive Program for all eligible Districts' employees, as authorized by California Government code Section 31641.04; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement by and among County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, District No. 1 is the appointed authorized agent to act for every other District; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, acting as agent for County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, adopted Ordinance No. 126 on June 28, 1995, Incorporating all of the same provisions as in Joint Resolutions Nos. 95-19 and 95-53; and WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 have determined that the manner of performing service, and the total cost savings of having higher compensated employees retire and lower Compensated employees hired to replace the retirees exceeds the total actuarial cost of the additional service Credit granted to those who retire under this program. NOW THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, does hereby ORDAIN: Section 1: All regular employees of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California, who are eligible to participate as members and retire under the Orange County Employees Retirement System are granted two (2) additional years of service credit for retirement benefit purposes, provided, they retire from regular employment of the Districts during the period of January 12, 1995 through and including March 30, 1996. 1 Section II: The General Manager of the Districts is authorized to execute any and all , contracts or other documents and to transfer all required funds in order to implement the authorized actions provided for herein. Section III: The total cost savings of positions filled at a lower level or held vacant for a period of time shall exceed the total actuarial cost of the additional service credit granted and related paid leave pay-off costs. Section IV: For a period of five years, or until such time as the full actuarially determined cost is paid to OCERS, the Districts' Controller will conduct an annual postaudit to verify that the savings exceed the actuarial and related costs attributable to the additional service credit, and report the findings of that audit to the Finance,Administration and Human Resource Committee. The first report will be presented during the fourth quarter of FY'96. Section V: This ordinance shall become effective January 12, 1995. Section VI: The Secretary of the Board shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause a summary to be published in a newspaper of general circulation as the District is required by law. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 at a regular meeting held December 13, 1995. Chairman, Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California Secretary of the Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California s0000000r 2 aver t JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 15, 1995 Agenda Item (19): Consideration of the following actions relative to introduction and adoption of proposed Urgency Ordinances Relating to Excess Capacity Charges for Sewer Connections, Repealing Ordinances Establishing and Payment of Excess Capacity Charges: Repealing District Ordinance Ordinances 1 129 125 & 127 2 221 219 & 220 3 324 322 & 323 5 533 531 & 532 6 627 625 & 626 7 734 732 & 733 11 1123 1121 & 1122 13 1317 1315 & 1316 14 1409 1407 & 1406 Summary On May 24, 1995, the Board of Directors of each of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County adopted an Ordinance, effective July 1, 1995, establishing excess capacity charges for new users with high Flows (over 50,000 gallons per day) and high solidslBOD. In August, the Districts learned that this Ordinance would require several large businesses which were considering moving into Orange County to pay one time fees of several million dollars. Therefore, on August 23, 1995, to provide immediate relief for these businesses, the Boards adopted an Urgency Ordinance to allow payment of these fees over a ten year period. Even with the adoption of this payment option, there are continuing concerns about the effect of the excess capacity charges on business development in Orange County. Staff is about to begin a project to review connection fees for all users. This project will consider additional changes to the excess capacity charge. While this study is conducted, staff recommends that Ordinance No. 125 establishing the excess capacity charge be repealed, and charges for large users be established on a case-by-case basis under Article 3, Section 309 of the Districts' Wastewater Discharge Regulations, consistent with the Districts' prior practice. Since the Urgency Ordinance applies only to Ordinance 125, it is no longer needed and should also be repealed. On November 9, Directors Collins, Stanton and Singer were briefed by the Director of Technical Services on the status of the ordinances and permit applications. These Directors had expressed interest due to receiving and invitation to meet with the"Orange County Red Team"to discuss the impact of these ordinances on business development. These Directors have each indicated their strong support for this staff recommendation and have urged the Joint Chair to add this to this agenda for immediate action. Staff Recommendation Stall recommends consideration of adoption of above-referenced urgency ordinances, repealing ordinances establishing and payment of excess capacity charges. JA POOQB31NG9NJOVBsklawm "a JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING AGENDAFOR NOVEMBER 15, 1995 DISTRICT 2 Agenda Item (26): OMTS95-046 Consideration of motion recommending approval of Permit Agreement between Serrano Water District and County Sanitation District No. 2, authorizing a one-time Excess Capacity Charge payment of $26,404.49. Summary The Califomia Department of Health and Safety, under the California Surface Water Filtration and Disinfection Treatment Rule, has directed the Serrano Water District (Serrano) to construct anew surface water treatment plant (Water Treatment Plant). Serrano has requested authorization from County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County (District No. 2) to dispose of treatment solids from the new Serrano facility to District No. 2's sewerage system. Article 3, Section 309 of District No. 2's Wastewater Discharge Regulations (Ordinance) states that projects requiring substantial sewerage system facilities capacity may be subject to an Excess Capacity Charge (ECC). In May 1995, the Boards of Directors adopted a policy allowing any user applying for a connection permit prior to July 1, 1995, and which is subject to an ECC, may elect to have the charge assessed using the old or new ECC formula. In June 1995, Serrano submitted an application to District No. 2 requesting a maximum discharge of 4,000 gpd of wastewater containing a maximum of 1% solids from their Water Treatment Plant. The proposed permit agreement between Serrano and District No. 2 will allow Serrano to discharge wastewater containing suspended solids to District No. 2's sewerage system under the provisions of a Class I Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit. Additionally the permit agreement requires Serrano to pay a lump sum, one-time ECC of$26,404.49 and an annual industrial user charge for the discharge from its facility. Under the terms of the permit agreement, Serrano will also be obligated in the future to pay an additional ECC based upon any increased volume of wastewater discharge in accordance with District No. 2's then-existing method of calculating ECC. The permit agreement is necessary because the discharge of the suspended solids differs significantly from discharges of other Class I permittees and staff believes that specific contractual limitations and provisions for indemnification of District No. 2 by Serrano are needed in case an unauthorized discharge occurs. 1 e Staff Recommendation to the Executive Committee Staff recommends the OMITS Committee receive and file the staff report dated October 25, 1995, and authorize staff to enter into the proposed permit agreement between the Serrano Water District and District No. 2 to accept the discharge of the water treatment facility's wastewater containing suspended solids to the sanitary sewer pursuant to the terms of the permit agreement; and authorize staff to assess a one-time ECC payment of$26,404.49. OMITS Committee Recommendation to the Executive Committee The OMITS Committee recommends the Executive Committee receive and file the staff report dated October 25, 1995, and recommends approval of proposed permit agreement between the Serrano Water District and District No. 2 to accept the discharge of the water treatment facility's wastewater containing suspended solids to the sanitary sewer and assess a one-time ECC payment of$26,404.49, pursuant to the terms of the permit agreement. Executive Committee Recommendation to the District No 2 Directors The Executive Committee recommends that the District No. 2 Directors approve the Permit Agreement with Serrano Water District. e,wmoc+eswos�v�ow�,ox-ss.cvx 2 P n a b October 25, 1995 STAFF REPORT OMTS95-046: REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION TO ENTER INTO A PERMIT AGREEMENT BETWEEN SERRANO WATER DISTRICT AND COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY BACKGROUND The Serrano Water District (Serrano) owns and operates a 3.5-million-gallon-per-day (MGD) surface water treatment plant constructed in 1963, which provides drinking water for Villa Park in Orange County. On September 25, 1991, the California Department of Health and Safety determined that the existing plant did not meet the requirements of the Surface Water Filtration and Disinfection Treatment Rule. Based on the findings and on Serrano's assessment of the modifications required, Serrano decided not to retrofit the 30-year old plant. Instead, Serrano will construct a new water treatment plant to meet current and future drinking water regulations. Serrano's new surface water treatment plant (Water Treatment Plant) will consist of several unit processes operating in series including coagulation, flocculation, sedimentation, filtration, and disinfection. The addition of the Water Treatment Plant will result in the generation of wastewater containing suspended solids which are from the sedimentation basins and filter back-wash processes. Serrano has requested authorization from County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County (District No. 2) to dispose of treatment solids from the new Serrano facility to District No. 2's sewerage system. The average volume of wastewater containing solids will be approximately 4,000 gallons per day (GPD) with a maximum solids content of 1.0 percent. Article 3, Section 309 of District No. 2's Wastewater Discharge Regulations (Ordinance) states that projects requiring substantial sewerage system facilities capacity may be subject to an Excess Capacity Charge (ECC). In May 1995, the Boards of Directors adopted a policy allowing any user applying for a connection permit prior to July 1, 1995, and which is subject to an ECC, may elect to have the charge assessed using the ECC as described in Ordinance No. 219 or using the following formula which determines the Excess Capacity Charges according to the facility's capacity based on the flow from the equivalent number of single family homes. ECC = (Flow, gpd)/356 gpd x 2,350 Where: ECC is the Excess Capacity Charge CSDOC 0 P.O. Box 8127 9 Fountain Valley.CA 9272E-6127 0 (n14) 962-2411 9 OMTS95-046 Page 2 October 25, 1995 In June 1995, Serrano submitted an application to District No. 2 requesting a maximum discharge of 4,000 gpd of wastewater containing a maximum of 1% solids from their Water Treatment Plant. The terms of the attached Permit agreement for the Serrano facility have been discussed and agreed upon between the respective staffs of Serrano and District No. 2. The Permit agreement between Serrano and District No. 2, pending District No. 2's Boards of Directors' approval, will allow the discharge of Serrano facility's wastewater containing suspended solids to District No. 2's sewerage system under the following terms and conditions: 1. A lump sum payment of a one-time Excess Capacity Charge in the amount of $26,404.49. The method used to determined the Excess Capacity Charge was detailed and presented in the March 8, 1995 Board Meeting. Additional Excess Capacity Charges shall be paid based upon the increased volume of wastewater discharge in accordance with District No. 2's then-existing method of calculating Excess Capacity Charges. 2. The discharge of Serrano facility's wastewater containing suspended solids shall be operated under the provisions of Class I Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit No. 2-1-137 (Exhibit A of the Permit agreement) which includes discharge limits, self-monitoring requirements, reporting and notification requirements, and other special permit conditions. 3. Payment of an industrial user charge in accordance with District No. 2's Class I user charge fee. The charge shall be based on the annual quantity of the Serrano facility discharge and the strength of the biochemical oxygen demand and total suspended solids. 4. Indemnification of District No. 2 for damages caused by any discharges from the Serrano Water Treatment Facility. RECOMMENDATION Pursuant to Article 3, Section 309 of District No. 2's Ordinance (Excess Capacity Charge), staff recommends authorization to enter into the proposed Permit agreement between Serrano Water District and District No. 2 to accept the discharge of the water treatment facility's wastewater containing suspended solids to the sanitary sewer pursuant to the terms of the Permit agreement; and authorize staff to assess a one-time ECC payment of $26,404.49. J:\W K35901LAUR I E W MTS75ERRANO C October 18, 1995 REF #SERRANO.RP PERMIT AGREEMENT This Agreement is made and entered into, to be effective the _ day of 1995, by County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California (hereinafter "District-2"), a County Sanitation District duly organized and existing pursuant to Section 4700 et seq. of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California, and the Serrano Water District (hereinafter "Serrano"), a municipal water district, to permit, subject to the limitations set forth herein, the discharge of wastewater containinoo suspended solids from Serrano's water treatment facility to District-2's sewerage collection, treatment, and disposal facility. RECTTALS A. District-2 is one of the nine County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (collectively "Districts") which operate pursuant to a joint administrative agreement. B. Serrano owns and operates a water treatment facility located at 19352 Taft Avenue in Orange, California. C. Serrano's existing water treatment facility is a 3.5-million-gallon-per-day water treatment plant which treats water to be transported to the Smith Reservoir. D. Serrano is expanding and modifying the existing treatment facility to 4 million gallons per day and in order to comply with the California Surface Water Treatment Rule (SWTR). Serrano's proposed 4-million-gallon-per-day water treatment facility modifications will result in generation of wastewater discharge containing suspended solids. E. Upon completion of the proposed modifications, Serrano's water treatment facility will provide conventional treatment consisting of coagulation, flocculation, sedimentation, filtration, taste and odor control, and disinfection. Chlorine will be used for disinfection. F. The wastewater containing suspended solids produced by the proposed modified treatment processes at Serrano's water treatment facility will contain the solids 1 9 removed from the sedimentation basins and solids produced during filter backwash. These solids consist mainly of aluminum hydroxide (Al,,(OH),), powder-activated carbon (PAC), and silt/organics. In addition, the wastewater containing suspended solids will also contain chlorine and the following treatment chemicals which are added to facilitate the coagulation and flocculation processes: Chemical Purpose Aluminum Sulfate Coagulant Polymers (polyelectrolytes) Coagulant aid, filter aid, wash water recovery Powder-activated Carbon Taste and odor control Should the parties hereto subsequently agree to modify the list of chemicals set forth in paragraph E, they may do so by letter agreement executed by both parties. G. The maximum volume of wastewater containing suspended solids discharged from the modified Serrano water treatment facility will be 4,000 gallons per day (GPD) with a maximum solids content of 1.0 percent. H. Serrano has requested authorization from District-2 to dispose of the wastewater containing suspended solids generated from its water treatment facility through District-2's sewerage facilities. I. Through District-2's Wastewater Discharge Regulations (District-2's Ordinance), District-2 regulates the discharge of industrial wastewater to District-2's sewerage system. J. The parties acknowledge that the wastewater discharged from Serrano's water treatment facility is subject to all requirements set forth in District-2's Ordinance and the terms and conditions of Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit No. 2-1-1-37 (hereinafter "Permit No. 2-1-137"), attached hereto as "Exhibit A" and incorporated herein by this reference. 2 K. Through this Agreement, the patties hereto intend to set forth their respective obligations regarding compliance with District-2's Ordinance and the terms and conditions of Permit No. 2-1-137, and certain financial obligations associated with discharges from Serrano's water treatment facility. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the facts recited above and the covenants, conditions, and provisions set forth below, the parties hereto agree as follows: AGREEMENT 1. Serrano is authorized to discharge wastewater containing suspended solids with a maximum solids content of 1.0 percent from its water treatment facility to District-2's sewerage system and facilities pursuant to and in conformance with the terms and conditions set forth in Permit No. 2-1-137 and District-2's Ordinance as each may be amended by District-2 from time to time. 2. Serrano shall install an effluent flow meter at its water treatment facility at the sample point specified in Permit No. 2-1-137. Serrano shall calibrate the flow meter in accordance with District-Ts requirements specified in Permit No. 2-1-137. Serrano shall submit calibration reports on an annual basis and in the manner and on the dates specified in Permit No. 2-1-137. 3. Serrano shall pay to District-2 an annual industrial user charge in accordance with District 2's Class I User Charge Fee as such fee may be periodically adjusted by District-2. The charge shall be based on the annual quantity of the Serrano water treatment facility discharge and the strength of the Serrano water treatment facility discharge in terms of biochemical oxygen demand and total suspended solids, and shall be determined in accordance with District-2's requirements specified in Permit No. 2-1-137. Serrano shall, upon receipt of quarterly invoices from District-2, make estimated prepayments of the user charge fee to District-2. At the end of each fiscal year, Serrano's actual user charge obligation shall be calculated following a reconciliation process based upon the actual discharge from Serrano's water treatment facility. Supplemental bills or credits, as appropriate, will be issued as soon as reasonably practicable thereafter. 3 e 4. Serrano shall pay to District-2 a one-time Excess Capacity Charge (ECC) for treating and disposing of the wastewater containing suspended solids discharged from its water treatment facility. The Excess Capacity Charge shall be assessed using this formula: ECC = (flow, GPD)/356 GPD x $2,350.00, where flow = 4,000 GPD. Upon issuance of Permit No. 2-1-137, Serrano shall make a lump sum payment to District-2 for the Excess Capacity Charge in the amount of$26,404.49. No discharge of wastewater containing suspended solids to District-Ts sewerage facilities shall occur until Serrano has paid to District-2 the $26,404.49 Excess Capacity Charge. 5. If Serrano intends to increase the volume of wastewater containing suspended solids discharged above 4,000 GPD, Serrano shall first obtain District-Ts written approval to allow such increased discharge. Such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. If District-2 determines, in its sole discretion, that the increase in volume is substantial, District-2 may impose and Serrano shall pay an additional Excess Capacity Charge in accordance with the Districts' then-existing method of calculating Excess Capacity Charges. 6. In the event that the discharge from the Serrano water treatment facility fails to comply with any term or condition of Permit No. 2-1-137 or of District-Ts Ordinance due to a breakdown of equipment, accident, human error, or any other cause, Serrano shall immediately notify District-2 in accordance with Section 501.3 of District-Ts Ordinance. 7. If the discharge from the Serrano water treatment facility violates any provision of Permit No. 2-1-137 or District-Ts Ordinance and causes or contributes to any obstruction, interference, damage, or any impairment to District-Ts or Districts' sewerage system or facilities or the operation thereof, which results in a violation of the Districts' National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit, or which results in costs, expenses, or damages of any kind to District-2 or Districts, or the imposition of civil or administrative penalties on District-2 or Districts, Serrano shall immediately determine or cause to be determined the extent to which such obstruction, interference, damage, or impairment is caused by its water treatment facility and shall take immediate action to correct the cause. In any case, within forty-five (45) days following notification to Serrano by District-2 of the 4 existence of costs, expenses, damages and/or penalties incurred by or imposed on District-2 or Districts, Serrano shall cause full reimbursement to be made to District-2 and Districts to the extent such costs, expenses, charges, and/or penalties are attributable to Serrano's water treatment facility and/or the operation thereof. Reimbursement shall include, but not be limited to, all costs and expenses incurred to clean and repair the facilities, together with applicable expenses incurred by District-2 or Districts to resume normal operations, as specified in Section 607, or any amendment or successor provision thereto, of District-Ts Ordinance, and any other related damages, penalties or expenses incurred by or imposed on District-2 or Districts. 8. In the event that a discharge from Serrano's water treatment facility is found to be in violation of the terms and conditions of Permit No. 2-1-137 or District-Ts Ordinance, or any amendment of or successor Ordinance thereto, Serrano shall comply with any final administrative or judicial order(s) (1) requiring corrective action(s) to be taken as a result of such violation, and (2) requiring payment of any administrative or civil penalties assessed by the District(s) or a court of competent jurisdiction for the violation. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Serrano shall immediately comply with any judicial or administrative order(s) issued on an emergency basis requiring corrective action(s) to be taken as a result of such violation. Compliance with an order issued on an emergency basis shall not constitute a waiver of Serrano's right to subsequently contest the emergency order. 9. Serrano shall cooperate fully with District-2 in the investigation and identification of the source of any discharge violation, including, without limitation, making available all sampling reports, production reports and investigatory reports which are in Serrano's possession and control, or which are within the possession and control of Serrano's contractors or subcontractors, relating to such violation. . 10. Serrano, for itself and its successors and assigns, hereby agrees to indemnify and hold harmless District-2 and Districts, and their officers, agents, board members, and employees from any and all claims, damages, liabilities, judgments, and causes of litigation, including but not limited to reasonable attorney fees and court costs, if any, which District-2 5 or Districts may incur as a result of any discharge in violation of any provision of Permit No. 2-1-137 or District-Ts Ordinance from Serrano's water treatment facility to District-2 and/or Districts' sewerage collection, treatment, and disposal facilities. 11. The persons executing this Agreement represent and warrant that the execution and performance of the terms of the Agreement have been duly authorized by all requisite corporations, partnerships, individuals, and municipal or other entity requirements and that said persons have the right, power, legal capacity, and authority to execute this Agreement. 12. Nothing herein shall be construed to limit the authority or ability of District-2 to enforce any requirements or conditions contained in District-Ts Ordinance, or any amendments of or any successor ordinance thereto, or upon forty-five (45) days' written notice, to modify the terms and conditions of Permit No. 2-1-132 pursuant to the Ordinance Section 302.4, or any amendment or successor provision thereto, if District-Ts General Manager determines that the modification is appropriate to protect District-2 and/or Districts' sewerage collection, treatment, and disposal facilities or if the United States Environmental Protection Agency, the California Environmental Protection Agency, the Regional Water Quality Control Board, or any other regulatory body with jurisdictional authority over District-2 requires the modification. 13. This Agreement may be terminated upon two years' written notice. 14. Any formal notice, demand or request provided for in this Agreement, or given or made in connection with this Agreement, shall be in writing and shall be deemed to be properly given or made if personally delivered, sent by registered mail (postage prepaid), or telecopied (with confirmation by registered mail) to the person specified: To Serrano: Mr. David H. Noyes, General Manager Serrano Water District 18021 East Lincoln Street Villa Park, CA 92667 Telephone Number: (714) 538-0079 Telecopier Number: (714) 538-5279 6 To District-2: Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 Telephone Number: (714) 962-2411 Telecopier Number: (714) 962-0356 15. Upon termination of this Agreement, the discharge from the wastewater treatment plant at the Serrano water treatment facility shall immediately cease. The discharge of domestic sewage from the facility shall be unaffected. 16. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and may not be altered or amended except by written agreement signed by the parties. All prior and contemporaneous conversations, negotiations, agreements, arrangements and understandings between the parties hereto as to the subject matter hereof are merged herein and superseded hereby. 17. In the event that either patty brings a lawsuit arising out of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and costs in addition to any judgment or other relief granted. 18. This Permit Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which when so executed shall constitute the original, but such counterparts shall together constitute the same Permit Agreement. 7 SERRANO WATER DISTRICT a municipal corporation Dated: By: David H. Noyes, General Manager ATTEST: Dated: By: Approved as to form: Attorney Date: By: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY Dated: By: Donald F. McIntyre General Manager Approved as to form: Date: By: Thomas L. Woodruff General Counsel MT:lvw REF #SERRANO.RP 8 EXMIT A Permit No. 2-1-137 Issued to Serrano Water District 9 INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER LASS I PERMIT -137 FOR DISCH GE OF WASTEWATER ISSUED BY COUNTY SANITA N DISTRICT No. 02 OF ORANGE COUNTY In accordance with the provisions of the Wastewater Discharge Regulations of County Sanitation District 02 of Orange County, herein referred to as "District", SERRAN AT DISTRICT 19352 T A ORANG A 7 hereinafter referred to as " thorized to discharge industrial wastewater from the above identified facility into the District's sewerage system in accordance with the conditions set forth in this permit. Such conditions are as specified in the following parts of this permit: Pan 1 - Ef =t Limits and Flow masts Pan 2 - Mon<requireme Notification. ring Requiremetns Pan 3 - Standns Part 4 - Spec Compliance with this perm Tell the Permittee of its obligation to comply with the District's Wastewaations, any applicable pretreatment regulations, standards or re , State, and Federal laws, including any such regulations, standaireme ws that may become effective during the term of this permcompliance ith any term or condition of this permit constitutes a violation of the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations. This permit shall become effective on and shall expire on r By: Mahin Tale Source Con Mara q,p\TAIIpN�� l, - Issued on October 1S, 1995 :. INITIAL PERMIT ] i i fi COUNTY SANITATION DIS ICTS OF O NGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 (714) 962-2411 PART 1 - EFFLUENT LBHTFS AND PLOW BASIS During the period from the effective data to the expiration dam of the permit. Permiaee is authorized to discharge industrial wastewater into the sewerage system trib the District's sewerage facilities. The effluent discharge shall not exceed either the following concentration lintiIs m m ar the mass emission rate limits in Lbs/day, based an 4000 gallons per day (gpd) of waster Bow at the sampling poi Company Name SERRANO WATER&ECT Permit No. 02-1-137 Effective Date: Sewer Address 19352 TAFf AVENUIS I Flow Base:4000 gpd Expiration Dam: ORANGE, CA 92667 Category: ®oc•s Lou: 0 DISCHARGE.LIMITS CONSTITUENT Instantaneous Daily Max 4-Day Avg Monthly Daily Max Monthly Limh, /L mg/L mg/L Avg Lbs/day Avg mg/L Lbs/day Arsenic (As) 2. 2.00 0.067 + Cadmium (Cd) 0.033 Chtmnium Total (Cr) • 0.067 Copper(Cu) 3.00 3.00 • • 0.100 Lead (Po) 2.00 2.00 0.067 Mercury (Hg) 0.03 0.03 0.001 Nickel (Ni) 10.00 10.00 0334 Silver(Ag) 5.00 • • 0.167 Zinc(Zo) 10.00 • • 0.334 Combined Metals (Platinum, Palladium, Total Memis(Cr, Cu, Ni, Zn). Cyanide(Totaly 5.00 Cyanide(Ame mbley 1.00 Polychlorinated Biphenyls 0.01 0.01 Pesticides 0.01 0.01 Total Toxic Organics 0.58 0.58 • • 0.019 Total Phenols • • • • + Sulfide (Tote) • • • 0.167 Sulfide (D'osoWed) 0. � r 0.50 • • 0.017 Oil&Grease (Minrenl or Petroleum) I00 ; 100.00 • • 3.336 Ammons(as N) Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD) • • 15000 10(100 Chemical O enDemand COD DIE b - 12 6 - 12 SAMPLING POINT LOCATION: The above effluent limits apply at the sampling point located (to be determined). The sample point is to be determined and represents all industrial wastewater discharge from the facility. Producluon-based lumats (Cyanide limits apply at the sampling point a ut prior to dilution with other streams. If there is no cyanide treatment. the sample most be taken at the en a cyanuc,p fore dilution with other process streams. In the absence of cyanide process, the limits apply at the same point location desc above (end of pipe). SERRANO WATER DISTRICT • PERMIT NO. 02.1.137 • PAGE 1.2 PART 2 - SELF-MONITORING, N CATION AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS 1. SELF-MONITORING REOuntE Permiree shall conduct monitoring of its owI `Bliaetttsf VY purpose of determining the status of compliance/non-compliance and user u charges#, sed on the results, Pernam,e shall make the necessary adjus®eats/corrections to bring the wasawa "%- ischarge into immediate compliance with its permitted limits. The specific requirements are as follows: A. Monitoring Requirements From the effective date of the permit and until the permit is terminated or revised. Permittee shall monitor its wastewater discharge for the following paramemns at the indicated frequency: Parameters Mea&ment Frequency Sample Type' Heavy Meals: Silver ,a -_._.Yl9aerlacf' composite Cadmium 1/quarter composite Chromium 1/quarter composite Copper 1/quarter composite Nickel 1/quarter composite lead I/Alaarter composite Zinc 0 r4Ygtmrar composite Cyanides: Cyanide (Total) nual grab Total Toxic Organics: 601/602 or 624 Semi-annual grab Others: BOD npy, 1/quarFErx composite TSS Daily composite W& Grease Min. /quarter grab now (gal/day), pH' 1 Sample tYPi h hmid mmPoxi¢or f:aM1 as 4cfuwi m Jic Duvi¢'s Wuawatt ,rrvuiom(OrUhurccl uMa awion 101. 2 Flow aM pH xM1oulJ M1e n�xurel xom�rtmmY wiN compmiu vnpling for M1avy mcWs. 3 NOTE: To the extent that special condition in Part 4 of this permit require more extensive self monitoring, the special conditions shall apply. B. Representative Sampling and Laboratory Atwlyws" ' Samples and measurements taken ss Ypjbired herein shall 1 <presenative of the volume and nature of the regulated industrial discharge during`bours of production samples shall be taken at the sampling pout location. All equipment used for sapping and analysis mukin, routinely calibrated, inspected, and maintained to emure its accuracy. All sampling 4ad laboratory analyses 94011 be conducted in accordance with Attachment A. SERRANO WATER DISTRICT a PERMIT NO. 02-1-137 a PAGE 2.1 C. Frequency,Sampling Schedule a Dates for Submission of Reports Sampling of wastewater effluent an poring of results shall be done in accordance with the schedule shown below. Sampling may be perform ed dam range. If sampling cannot be conducted within the specified dam for any v be notified in advance and in writing, of the reasons) for the irub9iry m sampl the new proposed sampling dam. HEAVY METALS 0 Sampling Date Report Submission Due Date Third Quarter (Jan 1995-Mar 1995) January 16-January 26 February 15. 1996 Fourth Quarter (Apr 1995-Jun 1995) April 16-April 26 May 16, toss Fret Quarter (Jul 1995-Sep 19951 July 15-July 26 August 15, 1996 Second Guano, (Om 1995-Dec 1995) October 14-October 25 November 14. 1996 Third Quarter (Jan 1996-Me 96) very 13-January 24 February 13, 1997 Fourth Quarter (Apr 1996-Ju 96) April 14-April 26 May 15, 1997 First Duane, (Jul 1996-Se 961 July 14-July 26 August 14, 1997 Second Quarter (Om 1996-Da ember 24 November 13, 1997 CYANIDES Sampling Date Report Submission Due Date Second Hall (Jan 1996-Jun 1996) Feel Half Jut 1995-Dee 1995) January 16-January 26 February 15, 1996 Second Half (Jan 1996-Jun 1996) July 15-July 26 August 16, 1996 First Half Jul 1996-Dec 1996) January 13-January 24 February 13, 1997 Second Half (Jan 1997-Jun 19971 Jq, ly 25 August 14, 1997 TOTAL TOXIC ORGANICS ITTO) piing Date Report Submission Due Date Second Hag (Jan 1995-Ju FM Half (Jul 1995-Dec 15-April 26 May 16. 1996 Second Half (Jan 1996-Jun 1996 14-October 25 November 14. 1996 Fist Halt Jul 1996-Dec 1996) pro 26 May 15. 1997 Second Half (Jan 1997-Jun 19971 October 13- ember 24 November 13, 1997 TSS Sampling Date Report Submission Due Date Third Quarter (Jan 1995-Mar 19961 Deily 20th of neat momh Fourth Quarter (Apr 1995-Jun 1995) Deily 20th of nowt month First Quarter (Jul 1996-Sep 1995 De lY 20th of neat month Second Quarter low 1995-Dec 20th of next momh Third Quarter (Jan 1996-Me 96) %PNIEDeily 20th of neat mordh Fourth O niner (Apr 1996-Ju 96) Dolly 20th of next month First Quarter (Jul 1996-Sep 961 Deily 20th of next month Second Quarter (Oct 1996-De -PERR20th of non momh SOD AND OIL AND GREASE Sampling Date Report Submission Due Date Third Quarter (Jan 1995-Mar 1995) January IS-January 26 February 16, 1996 Fouts Quarter (Apr 1995-Jun 1995) April 15-April 26 May 16, 1996 Far Quarter (Jul 1995-Sep 1995) July 16-July 26 August 15, 1996 Second Quarter (Om 1995-Dec 1995) October 14-October 25 November 14. 1996 Third Quarter IJen 1996.Mar 1910 January 24 February 13, 1997 Fourth Quarter (Apr 1996.Jun AM ApAI'V ApA 25 May is. 1997 First Guertin (Jul 1996-Sep 61 July 1 my 25 August 14, 1997 Second Guano, (Oct 1996-De 981 October 13 stober 24 Novambm 13, 1997 bNEEMA SERRANO WATER DISTRICT • PERMIT NO.02-1-137 a PAGE 2.2 D. Requirements for Reporting Resugq 1. Self-Monitoring Reports Permince shall submit a Se16Moni - - -�dare(s) specified above. Monitoring results shall be summarized and reported on an S -'orm as shown m Attachment A. The report shall indicate the concentration of all pollutants N the effluent for LL{j/ch sampling and analyses were performed, including water meter readings required for flow measurement. TIIIIEatrict will not accept formats other than what is shown in the SMR form; therefore, forms provided by the District or replicas must be used far reporting of results. The SMR form shall be completely filled-out, with copies of all laboratory results attached. 2. Signatory Requirements Prior to submittal of the SMR to the raid the results shall be verified and signed under penalty of perjury, by an authorized company official as defined in 4COR 403. E e„ E. Additional Monitoring Requireme9ta I. Respi, e to Nontompfianee 1. Resampling Upon submission of the SMR to the District by the required due date, the District will process the results for mass emission me calculations, review the concentration results, and notify Perminee of the results. If the results indicate that a violation of the applicable concentration and/or mass discharge limits has occurred, a Notice of Violation will be issued and Permiuce must repeat the sampling and pollutant analyses of the required parameters. as specified by the District, within 30 days of issuance of the Notice of Violation. 2. Reporting a. The monitoring results sit _- -"fitted in 20 days of completion of the revamping specified inE.1. b. The requirements for reporting res 'bed noD.1 and D.2, shall be followed for the additional monitoring requirements to response to noii -" e. m 11. NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS A. Permittee shelf comply with the notification requirements set forth in Section 501 of the District's Ordinance; I. Notification of Spill and Slug Loading 2. Notification of Bypass r B. Notification regarding Planned C Permitter shall notify the District ny facility expansion, production increase, or process modifications which may result in new or substantially increased discharges or a change in the nature of the discharge. Perenittee shall notify the District in writing of the proposed expansion and shall submit any information requested by the District for evaluation of the affect of such expansion on the Permiuee's discharge to the sewerage system. SERRANO WATER DISTRICT a PERMIT NO. 02-1-137 a PAGE 2.3 M. OTHER REPORTING REQUIREAITNTti A. Slug Discharge Control Pun Upon request by the District, Permktee is required to action:a Slug Discharge Control Plan on a biannual baits, that will address how the Femme twill respond to spills, bypass, and any accidental discharges, that may result in a violation of any permit limits or conditions, or may significantly exceed the normal Bow, or pollutant loading. The plan shall contain desired proc_Wyrcs to be followed by the permittee in responding to a slug discharge at the Permioee's facility. The procedures established shall include provisions to eliminate endangerment of human health by facilitating containment and clean-up of the slug discharge. The Slug Discharge Control Plan, at a minimum, must contain the following: 1. Description of the permin^e:4 sewer discharge practices including non-routine batch discharges. 2. Description of stored cherq�gpis mclu 'y type and characteristic, volume, and chemical heard classification. €, 3. Procedures m prevent slug discharges[Oahe sewer system. 4. Description of equipment for responding to slug discharges. 5. Procedures for inspection arid mai mmuce of the chemical storage areas m assure proper daily handling. 6. A copy of an operation log shecl recording the maintenance performed. volume of spill, and corrective measures taken. 7. Procedures for proper training of key personnel for handling slug discharges. IF, Emergency telephone numbers for promptly reporting slug discharges to the appropriate governmental agencies. B. Waste Minimization Requirements Upon request by the District. Fermmee shall pioviCe tvasu minimization plans to conserve water, investigate product substitution. provide inventory coined,implement employee education, and other steps as necessary to minimize waste produced. C. Changes in Company Information Permioee shall immediately inform the District of any changes or inaccuracies in the following company information which is currently on file: COMPANY NAME PHONE 714-538-0079 LOCAL SEWERING SERRANO WATER D1mOCT FAX 714-538-5279 AGENCY CRY OP ORANGE MAILING ADDRESS CHIET OPERATING OFFICER NO. OF EMPLOYEES 1 IIN215ASI'LINCOIN STPEET DA\ID H. NOYES Vir t a PARR.CA 92657 GI:NERAL MANAGER WORK DAYS/YEAR 365 SERVICE ADDRESS CONTACT S.I.C. NUMBER 19.U2 TAFT AVENUE DAVID IT. N'OYES 4941 ORANGE.CA 92667 GENERAL MANAGER D. FaksBylog Information Knowingly making any false suument on am repan or other document required by this permit or knowingly rendering any monitoring device or metitud inaccurate,u,a crime and may result in the imposition of criminal sanctions and/or civil penalties. Lj SERRANO WATER DISTRICT a PERMIT NO. 02.1.137 a PAGE 2.4 PART 3 - STANDARD CONDMOlk, 1. GENERAL PROHIBITIONS Pennine, is required to comply with the geneYil prohibitions and limits on discharges set ford, in Article 2 of the District's Ordnance: A. Prohibited Discharges B. Prohibition on Dilution C. Prohibition on Surface Runoff and Groundwater D. Prohibition on Unpolluted Water E. Prohibition on Radioactive Wastes F. Prohibition on the Use of Grinders G. Prohibition on Point of Discharge H. Limits on Wastewater Strength and racaris I. Prohibition on Medical Waste 1. Prohibition on Disposal of Spem S ons and dges H. CIVIL PENALTIES Any person who violates any provision of the D sDia's Ordinance; or any permit condition, prohibition or effluent Initiation; or any suspension or revocation order shall be liable civilly for a penalty pursuant in Article 6 of the District's Ordinance, for each day in which such violation occurs. III. CRUMNAL PENALTIES Any person who violates any provision of the.Dbtrictb Ordinance or any permit condition, prohibition or effluent hour, is guilty of a misdemeanor, which upon conviction h punishable by a fine not to exceed one thousand dollars ($I,000), or imprisonment for not more than six (6) months in the Cuuni,Jafl. or both. Each day in violation consumes a new and separate violation and shall be subject to the perwlucs contained herein. IV. SEVERABILITY The provisions of this permit are severable. If any provision of those permit limits and/or requirements, or the application thereof, to the Perminee is held invalid, the remainder of the permit limits and/or requirements shall remain in full force and effect. b, V. OTNER CONDITIONS A. Perminee is required in comply whkWl regular and discharge limits in the District's Ordinance and any attachments to this permit. t B. Except as expressly authorized by _-1*& .,or transfer of ownership of the business for which this permit is issued, this permit shall be void. The permince shall notify the District in writing prior to the transfer of ownership and shall give a copy of the existing permit to the new owner or operator. C. Permits issued under the District's Ordinance are for a specific user, for a specific operation at a specific location, and create no vested rights. Discharge permits, their concentration limits or their mass emission rates shall not be transferred for an operation at a different location. D. Pereninee shall maintain plant records discharge and waste manifests for a minimum of three years. '' ; kr' 3 SERRANO WATER DISTRICT • PERMIT NO. 02 1-137 • PAGE 3.1 PART 4 - SPECIAL. CONDITIONS#OR PERMIT NO. 02-1-137 • Permi•ee shall comply with there aAa(mo' ' 0iq[:.N the Permit Agreement. • Perminee shall provide a single di ge from any nondomesdc point by combining the two discharges from the flocculator/clarifier and the backwaecovery basin prior to commencement of discharge. • Permittee shall comply with the Effluent Flaw Meter and Flow Dam Requirements as specified in Alnchment E. LIM R � rt SERRANO WATER DISTRICT • PERMIT NO. 02-1-137 • PAGE 4.1 LTAM LMENTS TO PERMIT NO. 02-1-137 SERRANO WATER DISTRICT 1� j: SERRANO WATER DISTRICT PERMIT NO. 02-1-137 PAGE 4.2 ATTACHMENT A RMIT NO. 02-1-137 SE STRICT SELF- NITORING REQUIREMENTS 1. Sampling and Analysis of Heavy Me" a. Composite Sampling. Pertinence shall collect and awlyre a 24-hour composite sample of the wastewater effluent for heavy me" at a frequency specified in Part 2 of the permit. All effluent sampling must be conducted using an automatic sampling device which is capable of colleting samples at 15-minute intervals during all hours of discharge in a 24-hour day. Flow les are acceptable with a minimum of 96 samples inflected per 24 hours of discharge. For ba4l1fiscillujin a grab sample is acceptable for a well-mixed batch, otherwise a composite sample during the perimMilbehasdEmst be obtained. b. Discharge Flow. Water meter g the start and end of composite sampling to min detere the volume of water d 'pling period. Meter readings are necessary to determine the total flow needed for xilculati in of daily mass emission rate for the actual wastewater discharged. Additionally, the start and stop times must be recorded. The mils in which the water meter readings are expressed must be properly ascertained. Potentate shall measure and record daily total flow using flow measurement devices and methods that ensure an accurate measurement of the volume of monitored discharge. The use of effluent meters provides an accumte measurement of the volume discharged; however, hh the abs of effluent meters, the Districts accept the use of incoming water meters or process meter totalizers wi tits standard deductions such as domestic, process, and landscape losses. These deductions will a Districts, upon processing of the Self-Monitoring report, m determine the volume of was to the sewer system. The devices shall be installed, calibrated, and maintained to ensur accura f the measurements are consistent with the accepted capability of that device. C. Laboratory Analyses. All wastewater camp lyzed in accordance with the appropriate procedures contained m 40 CFR 136. Where 40 CFR 136 does a sampling or analytical techniques for the pollutants m question, analyses shall be performed using the ost current edition of 'Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater'. Wastewater analysis shall be performed by a laboratory utilizing the approved method for performing the analyses on the required cowtiments. Upon the Districts' request, Perntittee shall obtain from their laboratory and furnish to the Distriar, information regarding test methods and equipment used, including quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) information. Other information deemed necessary by the Districts to determine the adequacy, accuracy, and precision of the results may also be required. 2. Sampling and Analysis for Cymi a. Sampling. Permit¢¢ shall collect anjin ramde wastewater effluent for cyanides at a frequency specified in Pan 2 of the Permit. ust be conducted by taking grab samples of the wastewater after cyanide treaune,allbirAllIllibillitilipMEMMite. streams. If there is no cyanide vestment, the samples must be taken at the end of the cyanide process before dilution with other process streams. A minimum of four grab samples shall be taken independently during hours of operation within a 24-hour period. The grab samples may be composited prior to amlysis. Proper sampling and preservation techniques in accordance with EPA requiremenu must be used to ensure representative sample results. b. laboratory Analyses. All wastewater samples shall be analyzed for cyanides in accordance with the appropriate procedures contained in 40 CFR 136 using EP elhods. Wastewater analysis shall be performed by a laboratory utilizing the approved method for Porto on the required constiments. Upon the Districts' request. Permium shall obtain from raWry If to the Districts, information regarding test methods and equipment used, inclu A/QC infor ad Other information deemed necessary by the Districts to determine the adequacy, accurac d precision of the Its may also be required. SERRANO WATER DISTRICT a PERMIT NO. 02-1-137 a PAGE 4.3 3. Sampling and Analysis for Tond Orpnics(TTo) a. Sampling. Permiuee shall mum analyze samples of the wastewater effluent for TTO at a frequency specified in Part 2 of the permit. tattle organic compounds must be conducted by taking grab samples of the wastew four grab samples shall be Wren independently during hours of operation within a period. Each sample shall be analyzed independently for toxic organic constituents present in the facility. average concentration from the four grab sample results with concentrations greater than 10 ag be used m deerntine compliance with TTO mass emission and/or concentration limits. b. Laboratory Analyses. AN wastewater samples shall be analyzed in accordance with the appropriate procedures contained in 40 CFR 136 using EPA Methods (i.e., for P rgeable Halocarbons and Aromatics, use Methods 601 and 602, or 624). Wastewamr analysis shall be performed by a laboratory utilizing the approved method for performing the analyses on the req cumtimena. Upon the Dis[riarI request, Permutes shall obtain from thew laboratory and furnish m the Distri Wrote, regarding tat methods and equipment used, including QA/QC information. Other information d v by the Districts to determine the adequacy, accuracy, and precision of the results may also aired. 4. Sampling and Analysis or BOD a. Composite Sampling. Permitter shall collect and analyze a 244mur composite sample of the wastewater effluent for BOD and TSS at a frequency specified in Part 2 of the permit. All effluent sampling must be conducted using an automatic sampling device which is capable of collecting samples at 15-minute intervals during all hours of discharge in a 24-hour day. Flow-proportional samples are acceptable with a minimum of 96 samples collected per 24 hours of discharge. For batch dischargers, a grab sample is acceptable for a web-mixed batch, otherwise a composim sample during the period of discharge must be obtained. b. Discharge Flow. Water inner readings shall ring the star and end of composite sampling m determine the volume of water dischmg r sampling period. Meter readings are necessary to determine the teal Bow needed for �'' of as emission ran for the actual wastewater discharged. Additionally, the start and stop['zeta be recor The units in which the water meter readings are expressed must be properly ascemine<..� Perminee shall measure and record logy total Bow measurement devices and methods that ensure an accurate measurement of the volume of monitored discharg . e use of effluent meters provides an accurate measurement of the volume discharged; however, in the absence of effluent meters, the Districts accept the use of incoming water meters or process meter totalizers with appropriate standard deductions such as domestic, process, and landscape losses. These deductions will be applied by the Districts, upon processing of the Self-Monitoring report, to demmune the volume of wastewater discharged to the sewer system. The devices shall be installed, calibrated, and maintained to ensure that the accuracy of the measurements are consistent with the accepted capab0ity of that device. C. Laboraory Analyses. All waste setup analyzed in accordance with the appropriate procedures contained in 40 CFR 136 using EP ethod. stewaer analysis shall be performed by a laboratory utilizing the approved method for performing th lyses a required coastimena. Upon the Districts' request. Permittce shall obtain from their laboratory a • mish Districts, information regarding test methods and equipment used, including QA/QC informatio necessary by the Districts to determine the adequacy, accuracy, and precision tired. 5. Sampling and Analysis for 00 and Grease (O&G) a. Sampling. Permitter shall collect and analyze samples of the wastewater effluent for O&G at a frequency specified in Part 2 of the permit. All effluent sampling for O&G must be conducted by tatting a grab sample of the wastewater effluent at the sample point location. b. Laboratory Analyses. All wasewa lyzed in accordance with the appropriate procedures contained in 40 CFR 136 using EP od. Wasewa lysis shall be performed by a laboratory utilizing the approved method for performing th lyses on the requ' nsaments. Upon the Districts' request, Permitter shall obtain from their laboratory mish to the Distric formation regarding test methods and equipment used, including QA/QC informatio er information de4r�necessary by the Districts m determine the adequacy. accuracy, and precision iced. SERRANO WATER DISTRICT a PERMIT NO, 02.1.137 a PAGE 4.4 SMR No. SELF-MONITORING REPORT FORM REQUIRED PARAMETERS ' Sampling Dates Submission Date 20th of the following month COMPANY: PERMIT NO. CONTACT: SAMPLE DATE: SAMPLING START TIME: WATER METER LOCATION: SAMPLING STOP TIME: SAMPLE POINT LOCATION: # OF COMPOSITE HOURS: # OF DISCHARGE/OPERATING HOURS: NGS Stop Start Units t D gal D cu.ft. D Other 2 D gal ❑ cu.ft. D Other 3 ❑ gal cu.ft. D Other Cora osRe H: ❑ ` P P Incoming water meter ❑ ) meter ❑ Effluent Meter ❑ Batch Discharge No ULTS PARAMETERS mg/L EPA METHOD • Volume (in gallons) for Batch Discharge = COMMENTS: This form must be completely filled out and laboratoryoffieffiffiffiffial'sched. Composite samples obtained using autornatic hourly sampling device: ( 1 Yes ( I No In accordance wit 40 CFR 403.12,fine results presented herein must be verified and signed under penaly of perjury by O a responsible oprporete officer, fit general partner or proprietor,or(ii) a representative who has responsailhy for the overall operation of he permitted facilM, who has been authorized by the corporate officer,general partner of proprietor to sign such reports,and such autoication has been made in w ng and submitted to the Diviicts. I have personally examined and am familiar wit the information subm ocemenL based upon my inquiry of those individuals Immediately responsble for obtaining the Information reported herein, I believe that the s ie Wa, accurete,and complete. I am aware that there are significantpenalties for submitting false information,including the possibti a end imp L Signature Title Date 0. SERRANO WATER DISTRICT s PERMIT NO. 02-1-137 a PAGE 4.5 SELF-MONITORING REPORTS FOR TOTAL TOXIC ORGANICS AND CYANIDE REQUIRED PARAMETERS Sampling Date Submission Due Date 20th of the following month COMPANY: PERMIT NO. CONTACT: SAMPLE DATE: SAMPLING TIME: SAMPLE POINT LOCATION: SAMPLING RESULTS CYANIDE (mg/L) CN(T)_ CN(A)_ LIMTOTAL TOXIC ORGANICS (yg/L) EPA 601/602 604 624 625 Method t 2 ' 3 4 Ave. COMMENTS: A minimum of four grab samples shell be taken IndaperAb dma = of operation within a 2Mour period. Each sample shell be combined, and the combined sample be analyzed for c tym9de Wer9,{he composite results obtained using four grab samples( )Yee ( )No 11 This torn meet be completely filled out and lebomtory yele R a meet be att ched. In accordance with 40 CFR 403.72,the esuhs presented he v netl under penally of perjury by(i) a responsible corporate officer, (ii) general partner or proprietor.or(iip a representative who has responsibility for the overall operation of the permitted facility, wits has bean authorized by the corporate officer,general prtnerof proprietor to sign such reports,and such aulhor¢abon has been made in wring and submitted to the D¢bicb. I have personally examined and am familiar with the Information submitted in this document. Based upon my inquiry of those individuals anmedmisy responsibb for obtaining the information reported herein,I believe that the submitted Information b area,accurate,and complete. I am aware that Nero are significant penalties for submitting fibs information,including Me possibility of fine and imprisonment Signature re % Date SERRANO WATER DISTRICT a PERMIT NO. 02-1-137 a PAGE 4.6 ATTACHMENT R PERMIT NO. 02-1.137 SERRANO WATER DISTRICT EFFLUENT FLO ETER AND FLOW DATA REQUIREMENTS Pemuttee shall install an effluent Dow material - of wastewater discharged. The flow data report =at be submitted to the Districts quarterly. To ensure proper operation and continued scare f industrial wastewater discharge measurement, the flow monitoring system must be calibrated at least annually. The calibration report most be submitted to the Districts by the specified data. The following information must he provided in the calibration report: 1. Flow Monitoring System Description: Provide a brief description of the system and all separate components. 2 Contact Closure Frequency: Slat noelLnmni'� numher of gallant of wastewater discharged between sampling contact closures and the va n range variable counters. 3. Calibration Reaults: The system a testedf three I31 different known flow term The flow term should be near the manimamn maximischarged. The totalizer should also be checked by a procedure approved by a California registered engineer and subject to approval by the Districts. A copy of all data collected, any calculations performed and any other pertinent information =at be subnutted to the Districts. 4. Method of Calibration: A detailed description of the method of calibration must be provided,including a description of any special pieces of equipment used and a schematic of the complete calibration setup showing all significant features and equipment. Manufacturer's certified calibration corvas or dale, or recent laboratory curves or data must he submitted for any manufactured flow metering device used to check the "°'on of the flow monitoring system Comparison of the effluent flow monitoring system with i;ban, a -'teed ngs is not acceptable as a valid calibration chock. The method and instrumentation usedthe c ban must be sufficiently accurate It 2% of rate or better)to allow calibration of the company's syim z of rate. The data obtained from the calibration system should be compared with readings obtained simulta - number flow from the company's existing Dow meter. The installed flow monitoring system should then be adjusted t otalize the correct flows as indicated by the calibration system date. Flow monitoring Systems employing a propeller or turbine type meter, a mechanically actuated float level measurement system, or with other moving parts,must he calibrated at least semiannually and must be fully flow calibrated once a year. 5. Corrective Measures: All effluent flow monitoring systems must indicate, record, and totalize within t 5% of the actual discharge flow rate. If the system donr appropriate corrective action must be taken. Prior to any major system modifications, a of the proposed modifications should be submitted to the Districts for approval. Any atshould be described in the report to the District& ER DISTRICT a PERMIT NO. 02-1-137 0 PAGE 4.7 SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 15, 1995 - 7:30 P.M. In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the Districts' Administrative Offices not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each i agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the E Committee for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an emergency item or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the i attention of the Committee subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a I supplemental agenda posted in the manner as above, not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. (21) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any: (a) Consideration of motion authorizing consideration of Item (21)(c) listed below which arose subsequent to the posting of the agenda and which requires action at this time pursuant to authority of Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(2). (b) Verbal report of General Counsel (c) Consideration of motion to receive and file Summons and Complaint to Enforce Slop Notice, GE Supply, a division of General Electric Company, vs. Advanco Constructors, Inc., and County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Orange County Municipal Court Case No. 219240, in connection with Electrification of Pump Drives at Treatment Plan( No. 1, Job No. 131-36-1, and authorize the Districts' General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the Districts. j:wvvoocWvQ9W.11 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1995 Prepared By: Department of Finance Accounting Division Michael D. White Controller U U U U L' U (THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK) ' u u u U u u u u u u u u YY .. Comprehensive Annual Financial Report ,r Table of Contents For the Year Ended June 30, 1995 Paae r INTRODUCTORY SECTION: Letterof Transmittal-................................................................................................................... I GFOA Certificate of Achievement................................................................................................ be Boardof Directors........................................................................................................................ x OrganizationChart....................................................................................................................... xi Mapof Service Area..................................._................................................................................ xii r FINANCIAL SECTION: Independent Auditors' Report....................................................................................................... 7 Combined Financial Statements: Combined Balance Sheets.................................................................................................. 4-5 Combined Statements of Revenues, Expenses and Changes In RetainedEarnings ........................................................................................................... B Combined Statements of Cash Flom................................................................................. 7-8 Notes to Financial Statements..................................................................................................... 9-n COMBINING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: Combining Balance Sheet................................................................................................... 32-33 Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in RetainedEarnings............................................................................................................ 34-35 Combining Statement of Cash Flows.................................................................................. 36-37 STATISTICAL SECTION: Expenses by Type-Last Ten Fiscal Years.................................................................................. 39 Revenues and Contributed Capital by Source-Last Ten Fiscal Years....................................... 40 Property Tax Levies and Collections-Last Ten Fiscal Years...................................................... 41 Assessed and Estimated Actual Value of Taxable Property- .. Last Ten Fiscal Years............................................................................................................... 42 Property Tax Rates-Direct and Overlapping Governments- LastTen Fiscal Years............................................................................................................... 43 PrincipalUsers............................................................................................................................. 44 Ratio of Annual Debt Service-Last Ten Fiscal Years................................................................. 45 Computation of Direct and Overlapping Debt.............................................................................. 46 Bond Coverage-Last Ten Fiscal Years...................................................................................... 47 DemographicStatistics................................................................................................................. 46 Property Values, Construction and Bank Deposits- LastTen Fiscal Years............................................................................................................... 49 Estimated Populations of Cities and Unincorporated Arms Served by The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County.............................................................. 50 Insurancein Force........................................................................................................................ 51 Comparison of Volume of Wastewater Treated With Expenses by Type-Last Ten Fiscal Years 52 Biosolids Produced-Last Ten Fiscal Years................................................................................ 53 Miscellaneous Statistics............................................................................................................... 54 u u u u L' �J (THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK) - I II v u u u u u u u u u u u sn Introductory Section Fiscal Year 1994-95 3 3 0 0. c 0 N m n 0 0 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA prone: —7141962@411 nailing address: October 9, 1995 PO.8.8127 .Main Valle),CA 9272M127 street aelarase: Honorable Boards of Directors aria rlie Amnaa County Sanitation Districts vwmtan valley,Ca of Orange County a270&7015 Submitted herewith is the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1995. This report includes all of the individual District funds and was prepared by the Accounting Division of the Districts' Finance Department. Member AgenPBs Responsibility of both the accuracy of the data, and the completeness and fairness of the presentation, • including all disclosures, rests with the Districts. To the best of our knowledge and belief, the enclosed cities data are accurate in all material respects and are reported in a manner designed to present fairly the Ananern financial position and results of operations of the Districts. All disclosures necessary to enable the reader area to gain an understanding of the Districts'financial activities have been included. Buena Park cyPreaa The report presented herewith consists of three parts (1) an introductory section consisting of a letter of Fauntam Valley Fullarm transmittal, a list of principal officials, a Districts' organization chart, and a map of the individual Districts; Harwngton Ba.h (2) a financial section consisting of the independent auditors' opinion, general purpose financial Irvine statements, and combining statements of the individual District Enterprise Funds; and (3) a statistical La Habra La Palma section consisting of pertinent financial and nonfinancial data that presents historical trends and other Los mam,= information about the Districts. Newport Beach Orange Glacanua Included within the accompanying financial statements are all of the organizations, activities, and functions eee sanm Ana controlled by the Districts' Boards of Directors in accordance with the Governmental Accounting Basher.Tuto Standards Board Statement Number 14, 'The Financial Reporting Entity'. For the purpose of this s r r sun evaluation, control was determined by the Boards' responsibility for (i) adoption of the budgets and user code Park charges, (2) taxing authority, and (3) establishment of policies. The reporting entity and its services are yorrea ❑nda described in further detail in Note 1 of the financial statements. C- m , ar Orange sanitary oisrrlc[a GOVERNMENTAL STRUCTURE C.. Mesa The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, incorporated in 1954, encompasses the Northern Garden Gram Midway City section of Orange County. The Districts provide wastewater treatment for an area of the County covering Weer Oislric[s 470 square miles and serving a population of 2,275,713.or approximately 86%of the County's population. 11ina Panah The Districts are made up of nine separate public corporations. Each District is governed by a representative from each city or sanitary district within the District, and a member of the Orange County Board of Supervisors. Each District has its own budget and is responsible for the construction and maintenance of its own collection system. All Districts, except Districts 13 and 14, receive their own share of the 1% ad valorem properly tax levy. In addition. all Districts except District 14, collect user fees from property owners. District 14 receives contributions from user fees collected by the Irvine Ranch Water District. i — A Pubbc Wastewater and Environmental Management Agency Co-..m Prutecdng me Environment amce 1954 u u The purpose of the Districts' wastewater management program is to protect the public's health, preserve the beneficial uses of the coastal waters, and maintain air quality. The objectives of operating the treatment plants are to process and dispose of the treated wastewater and the separated solids in ILII accordance with Federal, state, and local laws including the Environmental Protection Agency. The Districts sewerage system includes approximately 630 miles of sewers that convey wastewater generated within the Districts' boundaries to the Districts' two wastewater treatment plants, Reclamation �J Plant No. 1 located in the City of Fountain Valley, and Treatment Plant No. 2 located in the City of Huntington Beach. j Reclamation Plant No. 1 has a primary treatment capacity of 108 million gallons per day (mgd). Treatment u Plant No. 2's designed primary treatment capacity is 186 mgd. Approximately 50% of the advanced primary effluent also receives secondary treatment. Both plants are master-planned for a future primary and secondary treatment capacity of 240 mgd for a combined total of 480 mgd. Outflows of treated wastewater from the two plants are combined, disinfected, and discharged to the I I ocean off the Huntington Beach coast through an outfall pipe that is 120 inches in diameter and u approximately five miles long. The last mile of the outfall pipe is a diffuser that dilutes the wastewater with seawater in a ratio of 148 parts seawater to one part treated wastewater at an average depth of 185 feet ECONOMIC CONDITIONS AND OUTLOOK On December 6, 1994, the County of Orange and the Orange County Investment Pool (OCIP) filed Chapter 9 bankruptcy as a result of a $2.02 billion investment loss suffered by OCIP. On the bankruptcy date, the Districts' was the second largest external depositor within the pool with $454 million invested. Because the Treasurer of the County of Orange served as the Districts' Treasurer, all of the Districts' u operating funds and idle reserves were invested within OCIP. The Districts' and other depositors reached a Comprehensive Settlement Agreement with the County that u was approved by the United States Bankruptcy Court on May 2, 1995. Under the terms of the agreement, the Districts received cash in the approximate amount of 77%of its investment balance as of December 6, 1994, together with certain notes and claims against the County for the balance of its investment, less I approximately 1% to 2%withheld by certain brokers pending resolution of litigation. In return, the Districts 6J released all litigation claims against the County and assigned all OCIP participant related claims against third parties to the County. I I On May 19, 1995, the Districts received a cash distribution that, together with previously released u emergency withdrawals, approximated 77%of their December 6, 1994 investment balance. On June 19, , 1995, the Districts received another 3% through proceeds of recovery notes sold in the public market by �L,,I the County. Of the remaining 20%of the Districts' December 6, 1994 investment balance still owed by the County, 9% is to be repaid through the "Settlement Secured Claims" and 11% through "Repayment Claims", both issued by the County. The "Settlement Secured Claims" are secured by a first-priority security interest on 65%of net litigation proceeds recovered by the County through third-party defendants. J The'Repayment Claims"are secured by a second-priority security interest on 65% of litigation recoveries by the County from third-party defendants. Due to the uncertainty of when the remaining investment balances owed will be repaid by the County, the Districts' have recorded a $96 million long term receivable on their June 30, 1995 Balance Sheet. This amount represents 20% of non-recovered investment principal plus interest eamings for periods prior to the December 6 bankruptcy filing. U ii r On October 9, 1995, the Governor of the State of California signed into law Senate Bills 863 and 1276 and Assembly Bill 1664. These bills provide for the financing of Orange County's Recovery Plan by diverting $50 million a year from local transit authority, parks and flood-control districts for up to 20 years. As part ^� of this proposed recovery plan, OCIP participants are being requested to amend their Comprehensive Settlement Agreement with the County by limiting their rights to the remaining shares of their non- recovered investment balances to litigation proceeds recovered by the County through third-party defendants. As of the date of this report,the Districts have yet to approve such an amended agreement. Like most local governments within the State of California, the Districts have been impacted by a prolonged economic recession. Although it now appears that the State's economy is rebounding, the " Districts are still recovering from the effects of the recession including the State's Permanent annual diversion of$3.5 million of property tax revenues from the Districts that began in 1992-93 and the $583 million decline in property tax assessed valuations from 1993-94 to 1994-95. This decline in assessed e. valuations was a primary factor in the $8.6 million reduction in property tax revenues for 1994-95. Because of the continuing financial problems of member agencies, the Districts again declined to raise sewer use service fees and connection fees for 1995-96 even though the costs of complying with stricter environmental and public health standards have continued to rise. However, even with the collapse of the OCIP, the loss of property tax revenues and the decision not to increase user fees to match increasing operating costs, the Districts still managed to maintain designated retained earnings of $369 million. Designated retained earnings have been earmarked by the Districts'Joint Boards for the following specific purposes: s, Designated For Operating Cashflow $ 31 million Designated For Operating Contingency 13 million Designated For Future Capital Expansion 100 million Designated For Environmental Requirements 10 million .. Designated For Self-Insurance 194 million Designated For Debt Service Requirements 21 million �^ Total Designated Retained Earnings $369 million .e MAJOR INITIATIVES Current Activities r The expansion of the Oxygen-Activated Sludge Secondary Treatment Plant, located at Plant No. 2, was completed in 1994-95 at a total cost of $17 million. The expansion of this facility has increased the capacity of secondary treatment at Plant No. 2 from 75 mgd to 90 mgd. During 1994-95, the public accounting and consulting firm of Ernst & Young conducted several review projects. The reviews included a Performance Measurement Assessment, and separate evaluations of Operations and Maintenance, Finance, Human Resources, and the Districts'capital improvement process. The recommendations resulting from these reviews are currently being implemented and are scheduled to be completed in fiscal year 1995-96. The appointment of a new General Manager in fiscal year 1994-95 was the starting point for a major restructuring of the Districts and the beginning of a new era of improvement. As part of the restructuring, the Joint Boards approved the reorganization of the Districts' top management team and established two Assistant General Manager positions to oversee Operations and Administration. Additional major changes for included: iii L i � V • Reorganizing Maintenance and Operations into two separate departments. • Consolidating the Compliance, Conservation, Recycle and Reuse, and Air Quality Divisions of the W Technical Services Department into the Environmental Management Division. i • Establishing two separate divisions for the planning and design functions within the Engineering .4 Department. • Transforming the Information Services Division, which used to be a part of the Finance jr Department, into the Information Technology Department • Transferring the Districts' payroll functions from the Human Resources Department to the Finance L Department • Establishing a Training, Safety and Emergency Response Division within Human Resources. L • Centralizing the functions of public relations, editing and writing support, graphic services, multimedia services, the receptionist, the mailroom, and printing and reprographic services into a new Communications Division within the General Manager's Office. 6.1 Future Activities u The Districts will be completing a joint agency benchmarking study on the costs to operate a wastewater treatment plant with East Bay Municipal Utility District and Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District. The study is being performed to provide a comparison of joint operating costs and operation and r, maintenance performance measures, and will compare the three organizations' department and division costs of their Joint Operating Budgets on a cost per million gallons of wastewater treatment. The study will cost approximately$60,000 and be shared equally by the three agencies. V The Districts plan to build a compressed natural gas refueling station in 1995-96. This station is projected to serve the Districts'wastehaulere in the removal of plant's biosolids, the Districts'entire vehicle fleet, the vehicle fleet of neighboring cities, and ultimately, the general public. The initial start-up cost of this facility r is projected to approximate$1 million. The Districts'will be undertaking a feasibility study on the acquisition of the landfills currently owned and operated by the County of Orange in 1995-96. Exisifing state law allows the Districts to operate both wastewater treatment and solid waste facilities. The Districts'have set aside$200,000 for a due diligence - review on the landfill system that currently receives 3,000,000 tons of solid waste per year. L The Districts'will also be considering the consolidation of the nine separate sanitation special districts that make up the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County into one single sanitation district. The benefits of such a consolidation would include: V • improved governance by having the governing body voting as a single unit instead of nine separate public corporations. L.i • the leveling of revenues and expenses among the nine separate Districts. • cost savings of up to$144,000 per year in the areas of accounting, debt financing, legal, and I administration. u W iv ICI SERVICE EFFORTS AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS The budget process and format was completely overhauled in 1994-95 with the development of the 1995- "' 96 budget. This 1995-96 proposed budget was streamlined through a one-step submittal and approval process, making it easier for each Director and each District to understand the bottom-line impact of the joint operating and capital budgets on each Districts' budget before they approved the Joint Works budget. In prior years, this was a two-step process in which the joint operating and capital budget recommendations were first prepared and approved by the Joint Boards, then allocated to the individual District budgets for approval and adopton. The 1995-96 "user friendly"budget is the most comprehensive document of its kind ever produced by the Districts, and is designed to be an important resource and planning tool. The budget format was also improved in the 1995-96 proposed budget. It now includes a broad overview of the Districts' financial condition; a complete listing of fiscal policies; the major assumptions used to develop the proposed revenues and expenses; and division narratives that include organization charts, staffing trends, service descriptions, performance measures and results, activity trends and budget a, summaries. The performance measures for 1995-96 also have a quantitative results section that is designed to provide a method of measuring actual results. A capital improvement section was also developed that included individual project detail sheets to help the reader better understand the nature and necessity of each proposed capital improvement. ACCOUNTING AND BUDGETARY CONTROLS The Districts' accounting records are maintained on the accrual basis for all funds. In developing and evaluating the Districts' accounting system, consideration is given to the adequacy of internal accounting s, controls. Internal accounting controls are designed to provide reasonable, but not absolute, assurance regarding: (1) the safeguarding of assets against loss from unauthorized use or disposition; and (2) the reliability of financial records for preparing financial statements and maintaining accountability for assets. The concept of reasonable assurance recognizes that (1) the cost of a control should not exceed the benefits likely to be derived;and (2)the evaluation of costs and benefits requires estimates and judgments by management. We believe that the Districts' internal accounting controls adequately safeguard assets and provide reasonable assurance of proper recording of financial transactions. Each year the Districts' Board of Directors adopts an annual operating plan. Joint works' budgets are first prepared that identify the specific capital projects and operating activifies to be undertaken by the Districts during the year. Upon adoption, Districts' staff allocates the joint works'budgets proportionately to each of the individual Districts and obtains individual District budget approval. The budgetary level of control, the level at which expenses cannot exceed budget, is exercised at the District, or fund level. All of the Districts have adopted a Uniform Purchasing Policy that identifies the agreed upon purchasing standards. ENTERPRISE OPERATIONS m Enterprise funds are used to account far the operations of the Districts, which are financed and operated in a manner similar to private business enterprises. This allows the Districts to determine that the costs (expenses, including depreciation and amortization) of providing wastewater management services on a continuing basis are financed or recovered primarily through user charges. Sewer service user fees are evaluated annually based primarily on budget requirements for total operation, maintenance and capital expenditures in providing wastewater management services. Property tax revenues are dedicated for the m payment of debt service. Comparative data covering the Districts enterprise operations over the past two fiscal years is as follows: v L Amount Percent of Increase of Increase i Revenues 1994-95 1993.94 IDecreasel LDecreasel V Operating revenues $ 70,532,273 71,447,918 (915,645) (1.28)% Operating expenses, including depreciation 89.384.941 84.268.142 5116.799 6.07% r Operating income(loss) (18,852,668) (12,820,224) (6,032,444) (47.05)% r Non-operating income, net 23,395,080 50.124.800 f28.728.7201 (53.32)% r Net income $ 4.543.412 37.304.576 26.767.3841 (71.75)% Operating revenues decreased slightly primarily because of a$615,791, or 0.87 percent decline in service charges and a $299,854, or 55.53 percent decline in permit and inspection fees. The slight decline in service charges is a reflection of the stagnant economy and the lack of any increases in service fees since 1991-92. The decline in permit and inspection fees is attributable to the cyclical nature in which these fees are collected. Permits are generally valid for a period of two years which causes annual fluctuations in this revenue category. The 6.07 percent increase in net operating expenses is primarily attributable to the 37.43 percent, or$3.2 r million increase in contractual services. Of these contractual service increases, $450,000 represents professional fees paid to Ernst 8 Young for their review of the Districts' capital project management, performance measurements, and departmental reviews of Operations and Maintenance, Technical v Services, Finance, and Human Resources; another$350,000 represents the increase in legal fees from the previous year which is primarily a result the Orange County bankruptcy; and another $300,000 represents the increase in biosolids removal which is combination of a 6.96 percent increase in tonnage removed compounded by a 6.70 percent increase in removal fees. The 53.32 percent, or$26.7 million decrease in net non-operating income is primarily the result of a 44.32 percent, or $14.7 million decrease in interest eamings, a 23.90 percent, or $8.6 million decrease in r. property tax revenues, and a 41.13 percent, or$7.0 million increase in interest expense. The decrease in interest earnings is primarily attributable to the decrease in cash and investment balances which in total declined by $228 million. This decline in total cash and investments includes the remaining 20 percent of the total deposit the Districts' had with the Orange County Investment Pool as of December 6 which, including interest accruing prior to December 6, 1994, totals$96.3 million. As previously mentioned, these funds are still owed by the County of Orange and have been reclassified as a long term receivable on the Districts' balance sheet as of June 30, 1995. r Another component of the total cash and investment decline also includes the retirement of the$50 million Taxable Commercial Paper Program and the $100 million Reverse Repurchase Agreement Program. These programs were initially designed to meet short term cash flow needs without reducing Districts' deposits within the Orange County Investment Pool (OCIP) for the purpose of maintaining larger investment yields. These debt programs were retired as a result of the OCIP bankruptcy. Of the $8.6 million decline in property tax revenues, $2 million is the result of a one-time receipt of property taxes received in 1993-94. This one-time receipt is associated with the uncollected property tax r vi •• revenues of prior years and the Districts' decision to forego penalties and interest revenues on future delinquent property tax payments. In the Districts' agreement with the County of Orange, known as the Teeter Plan, the County fronts all assessed property tax revenues belonging to the Districts and is therefore entitled to all of the future penalties and interest received on the ultimate collection of delinquent property taxes. The remaining decline in property tax revenues is primarily attributable to the$583 million decline in assessed valuations of taxable property from 1993.94 to 1994-95. The $7 million increase in interest expense is attributable to the increase in interest rates within the Districts' variable debt programs and by the lack of any capitalized interest expense in 1994-95. The annualized interest rates increased from 2.2% in 1993-94 to 3.8% in 1994-95 for the$100 million 1990-92 ` Series A Certificates of Participation, from 5.0% to 6.9% for the $117.6 million 1990-92 Series B Certificates of Participation, and from 2.2% to 3.7% for the $98.5 million 1990-92 Series C Certificates of Participation. Based on ongoing construction projects funded from bonded debt proceeds, $1.4 million of bonded interest expense was capitalized in 1993-94 with the intent to recognize this expense over the future lives of the related assets. All bonded debt interest payments for 1994-95 were expensed. DEBT ADMINISTRATION At June 30, 1995, the Districts had a number of debt issues outstanding. These issues, net of applicable unamortized discounts, included $416.7 million of certificates of participation and $75,000 of general obligation bonds. The Districts have maintained their AA- rating from Standard and Poor's Corporation and As rating from Moody's Investor Services. r In January of 1995, the Districts retired $50 million of taxable commercial paper debt. No new debt was issued in 1994-95 and no debt issuances are contemplated for 1995-96. CASH MANAGEMENT Prior to December 6, 1994,the Districts'entire investment portfolio was managed by the County Treasurer within the Orange County Investment Pool (OCIP). As a result of the County of Orange and OCIP bankruptcy, the Districts established their own cash management program by the completion of the ,r following: • Appointing the Districts' Director of Finance as the Districts'Treasurer. y • Created its own investment policy. • Established its own banking relationships for the disbursement of funds. • Expanded and enhanced internal controls over cash management • Selected an outside money manager and independent custodian to manage the Districts' investment portfolio. The yield on maturing investments averaged 4.21% during 1994-95, down 3.53% from the prior year average of 7.74%. Interest earnings for the year were$18.500,000, while earnings in the prior fiscal year were $33,226,000, a decrease of$14,726.000. As previously mentioned, the primary reason for the total decrease is a result of the $228 million decline in cash balances available for investment. In addition, the Districts' have only received 80% of the interest earned on funds deposited with the Orange County Investment Pool for the first quarter of 1994-95 as a result of the pool's bankruptcy. ,., RISK MANAGEMENT For the year ended June 30, 1995, the Districts were self-insured for workers' compensation, property damage and general liability. The self-insured portion for worker's compensation is $250,000 per person vii L Li per occurrence with outside excess insurance coverage to the statutory limit. The self-insured portion for property damage covering fire, flood, and other perils is $25,000 per occurrence with outside excess insurance coverage to $200 million for fire, flood, and other perils. The self-insured portion for property damage covering earthquake is $250.000 or 5% per unit of insurance, which ever is greater, with outside insurance coverage to $30 million. The Districts also maintain outside comprehensive boiler and machinery insurance with a $100 million per occurrence combined limit with deductibles ranging from $25,000 to$100,000. The Districts are completely self-insured for general liability coverage. As of February 1, 1994, the Districts obtained outside insurance coverage for group medical claims and are no longer self-insured. Li Districts' management believes that there are no outstanding claims as of June 30, 1995 that would materially affect the financial position of the Districts. L INDEPENDENT AUDIT An audit of the books, financial records and transactions of the Districts is conducted annually by L independent certified public accountants. The Districts selected the accounting fine of Moreland & Associates to perform the audit for the year ended June 30, 1995. The auditors' report on the Districts' combined financial statements and combining statements is included in the financial section of this report. L This report renders an unqualified opinion on the Districts' combined financial statements for the year ended June 30, 1995. CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENT FOR EXCELLENCE " IN FINANCIAL REPORTING The Government Finance Officers' Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) awarded a r Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting to the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County for the Districts' comprehensive annual financial report for the year ended June 30, 1994. This was the very first award received by the Districts and it was earned on the very first comprehensive L annual financial report every prepared by the Districts. In order to be awarded a Certificate of Achievement, a governmental unit must publish an easily readable I I and efficiently organized comprehensive annual financial report, whose contents conform to program N standards. Such reports must satisfy both generally accepted accounting principles and applicable legal requirements. A Certificate of Achievement is valid for a period of one year only. We believe that our current comprehensive annual financial report continues to meet the Certificate of Achievement Program requirements and we are submitting it to GFOA to determine its eligibility for another certificate. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Preparation of this report could not have been accomplished without the dedicated services of the .+ Accounting Division staff, and I would like to express my appreciation to all members of the Division who assisted in its preparation. I would also like to thank the Districts' Boards of Directors, the General Manager, and the Director of Finance for their interest and support in conducting the financial operations L+ of the Districts in a responsible and progressive manner. Respectfully submitted, �� L ;GL�I���/ /✓ ' Michael D.White, CPA L Controller viii 1 J Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting Presented to County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California For its Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1994 A Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting is presented by the Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada to �+ government units and public employee retirement systems whose comprehensive annual financial reports(CAFRs)achieve the highest ® standards in government accounting and financial reporting. 4 m y f�President Executive Director v r ix l ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Board of Directors As of June 30, 1995 ALTERNATE L AGENCY/CITIES ACTIVE DIRECTOR DISTRICT NO(S). DIRECTOR Anaheim Bob Zemel 2, 3& 13 Tom Daly' I Brea Burnie Dunlap 2&3 Glenn Parker V Glenn Parker 13 Bumie Dunlap Buena Park Don R. Griffin' 3 Patsy Marshall Cypress Cecilia Age' 3 Walter Bowman L Fountain Valley John Collins 2&3 George Scott Fullerton Julie Be* 2&3 Chris Norby Huntington Beach Victor Leipzig* 3 & 11 Ralph Bauer ' Shirley Dettloff 11 Ralph Bauer Irvine Barry Hammond 7 & 14 Mike Ward' t La Habra James H. Flora 2&3 Steve Anderson Lrj La Palma Wally Linn* 3 Eva G. Miner Los Alamitos Charles E. Sylvia' 3 Robert Wahlstrom Newport Beach Jahn C. Cox, Jr. 5 Jan Debay La Jan Debay 5, 6&7 John C. Cox,Jr. Orange Mark A. Murphy 1, 2, 7, 13 & 14 Joanne Coontz' Placentia Norman Z. Eckenrode 2 Carol Downey Santa Ana Pat McGuigan 1, 2, 3&7 Ted R. Moreno Seal Beach George Brown* 3 Frank Laszlo Stanton Sal A Sapien 3 Harry M. Dotson' Tustin Thomas R. Saltarelli 1, 7& 14 Jim Potts* V Ila Park Barry Denes 2 Bob Bell Yorba Linda Daniel T.Welch' 2 John M. Gullixson '• John M. Gullixson 13 Daniel T. Welch* 6d Sanitary/Water Districts I I Costa Mesa Sanitary Dist James M. Ferryman 1, 6 &7 Arthur Perry Garden Grove Sanitary Dist. Sheldon S. Singer 2 &3 George L.Zlaket Midway City Sanitary Dist. Margie L. Rice 3 Grace Epperson 64 Irvine Ranch Water District Peer A. Swan 14 Darryl G. Miller I County Areas V County of Orange Roger R.Stanton" 1, 2, 3& 11 Wiliam G. Steiner' County of Orange William G. Steiner' 5,6, 7, 13& 14 Roger R.Stanton" u 'Mayor "County Supervisor J 4.1 i ' x Ld County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Organization Chart r vm�omuww mvmia ®mw aeewow�m _ _ mcow arr¢ r .emrum�n .nanxroe�u ww�mwe.+nws rwm�.m�mu+ni rl oeunnw �wx�evra i�mv�c�x wce� �sma rwa¢ ' oeumw rvnnowra imaew awaucHr wwna v�awunw mmxfa raoamarox �a •omonw�a wwmr saavcs raeosm.�nw �aaaw iamosm�nw �nmumnmx �mm�wnox mrarw vm wwr welieuw¢ o®w �erwrewau raamw rwwn[ - movna wrmc� ` v a+i° �m�voa e�,seavr vmaoemrtw nw�ma w[ir� e�mt+' wmag a:wr � •+ nvx�vurE. comma vrwcumrt arnwva .wxiewce r es�mm�r.�nx �E r r r r — A _OS nN6ELES Oq ": LA HABRA 4 .`41r1 ' BREA FULLE TON YORBA V I3 PLACENTIA LINDA J BUENA A PARK PALMA ' CYPRESS ANAH IM p VILLA STANTON PARK 0 LOS :ALAMITOS ORANGE GARDEN GROVE ESTMINSTER SE 8(D - _ SANTA o, - TIN ANA - I FOUNTAIN VALLEY - _ E Y HUNT INGTON ,r BEACH -- © 4� ✓ °ACiF.G COSTA x xrav MESA " ^ IRVINE as .,NEWPORT BEACH COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 xii Financial Section Fiscal Year 1994-95 r r r r � r r T 7 d 3 r N N �• r O 7 r r WOO r r r 610 NEWPOHT CENTER DRIVE.SUITE e40 NEW Rff BEACH.CALIFORNIA 92660 _ Moreland &j4 (214)26097M CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNP FS 2111 PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD,SUITE ISO CARLSBAD.CALIFORNIA 9ax19 1619)431.9476 September 22, 1995 The Board of Directors of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Independent Auditors'Report We have audited the accompanying combined financial statements of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (Districts) as of and for the year ended June 30, 1995, as listed in the table of contents. These combined financial statements are the responsibility of the Districts'management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these combined financial statements based on our audit. The combined financial statements of the Districts for the year ended June 30, 1994,were audited by other auditors whose report dated September 22, 1994,expressed an unqualified opinion on those statements. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the combined financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the combined financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall combined financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion,the combined financial statements referred to above present fairly,in all material respects, the financial position of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County as of June 30, 1995, and the results of its operations and cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. As further discussed in Note 13 to the financial statements,on December 6, 1994,the County of Orange filed for federal bankruptcy protection,which precluded the Districts from withdrawing their deposit in the Orange County Investment Pool. In accordance with a Settlement Agreement, the Districts have received a distribution of approximately 80%of their deposit. The remaining 20% has been recorded as a long-term receivable at June 30, 1995. The collectibility of this receivable cannot presently be determined. Accordingly, no provision for any Ions has been made in the accompanying financial statements. Our audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the combined financial statements taken as a whole. The accompanying combining financial statements listed in the table of contents are presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not a required part of the combined financial statements of the Districts. The information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the combined financial statements and,in our opinion, is fairly presented in all material respects in relation to the combined financial statements taken as a whole. The statistical information listed in the table of contents was not audited by us and,accordingly,we donot expressan opinion thereon. _ 1 U U U U U (7HIS PAGE LEFT wroamNALLY BLANK) UI{ Li L' U G U u . u u 2 u V V V COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS m u V e .y m - 3 1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY W Combined Balance Sheets June 30, 1995 and 1994 i 1995 SP84 Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents(note 2) $ 149,598,827 183.345.338 �I Cash held with fiscal agents(note 2) 5,976.693 5,924.214 Receivables: Accounts,net of allowances for uncolleciables 11,282,649 6,264,177 Accrued Interest 2,650,130 4137,237 Due from other governmental agencies 6,291,726 5:765,707 Other 110.170 Total receivables 20.224.505 16,277,291 Inventories 4,731,259 4,516,316 Prepaid and other assets 1.560.576 520.281 I Total current assets 182,089,760 210.683,440 L Restricted assets: Cash and cash equivalents(notes 2 and 4) 193,846.099 282,977.670 Investments(note 2) 19,493,434 24,384,960 Lrl Investments with trustee(note 2) - 100,000,000 Receivables: Accrued interest 3,446,147 3.887.225 Connection fees 529,669 1,732,269 Due from other Districts(note 9) - 8,948,250 Due from other governmental agencies 3,003.559 2,104,360 , Other 61,250 2.718.075 Total restricted assets 220.380A48 426,730,809 Due from other governmental agencies, noncurrent(note 13) 96.281.062 - Deferred charges 2,379,830 2,827-667 I Property, plant and equipment,at cost(notes 3 and 8): y, Land 7,121,672 7,111,223 Sewage collection facilities 297,097,448 293,180,564 Sewage treatment facilities 482.938,532 481,427,521 Sewage disposal facilities 80,149.899 80.128.368 U General plant and administrative facilities 84,126,341 79,567,547 Construction in progress 95.434.393 75.005.135 Total property,plant and equipment 1.046,865,285 1,016,420,358 �• Less accumulated depreciation 282,776,401 252526462 Net property, plant and equipment 764,091,884 763.893.896 Excess purchase price over book value on acquired assets(notes 5 and 8) 14.059.619 14,717,328 Other assets,at cost,less accumulated amortization 3546023 2,782.449 iw Total assets $1,282,828,329i 1 421 535 489 (Continued) Lri See accompanying notes to combined financial statements. V 4 u w COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Combined Belanoe Sheets(Continued) June 30, 1995 and 1994 s 1995 7994 Current liabilities payable from current assets: Accounts payable $ 4.882.538 4.252,747 Accrued expenses 2,421,614 5,289,540 r Deposits 2047.877 Total current liabilities payable from current assets 7.304.152 11.590.164 ^y Current liabilities payable from restricted assets: _ Retentions payable 595,992 1,253,058 Interest payable 5,621,823 6,293,628 Deposits 2,243.656 481,043 Due to other Districts(note 9) - 8,948,250 Claims and judgments payable,wrrent portion(note 4) 162,506 250,149 General obligation bonds payable,current portion (note 4) 15.000 15,0D0 Certificates of participation payable,current portion -- (note 4) 10,165,000 9,655,000 Obligations under reverse repurchase agreements 91 813,000 m Total current liabilities payable from restricted assets 18,703.977 118,709.128 Long-term liabilities: Compensated absences(note 4) 2,556,103 3,058.308 Deferred compensation payable 5,976,693 5,924,214 Claims and judgments payable,noncurrent portion(note 4) 379,177 124,251 Taxable commercial paper(note 4) - 50.000.000 General obligation bonds payable,noncurrent portion - (note 4) 45,000 e0,000 Certificates of participation payable,noncurrent r portion(note 4) 406,485,803 417,376.937 Deferred revenue 57.620 80,409 Total long-term liabilities 415,500.296 476,624.119 .n Total liabilities 441.508.425 606.923.411 Fund equity: ee Contributed capital(notes 5 and 8) 210,329,567 188,897,938 Retained earnings(note 11) 630990.334 625,714,140 Total Pond equity 841 3%901 814,612,078 Commitments and contingencies(notes 4.7 and 13) -- Total liabilities and fund equity $1,282,828.328 L421.535.469 See accompanying notes to combined financial statements. r 5 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 1v Combined Statements of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings For the year;ended June 30, 1995 and 1994 Ir 1999 1984 Operating revenues: Service charges $ 70,292,184 70,907,975 Permit and inspection fees Moll 539 943 I Total operating revenues 70,532.273 71 417918 Operating expanses other than depreciation and amortization: Salaries and benefits 3.537,783 4,170798 Utilities 549,596 546:688 I Supplies 514,723 297.354 L Contractual services 3,370,533 1,682,8110 Directors'fees 117,580 102,104 Travel and meetings 6,863 5,799 Repairs and maintenance 412,023 456,718 M+ Joint operating fund expense allocation,not(note 6) 46.632,488 42,834,264 Omer 147.189 183 059 Total operating expenses other than depredation and amortization 55297778 60.279654 Operating income before depredation and amortization 15,234,495 21.168,264 1 Depredation on contributed facilities 75,073 75,073 Depredation on other facilities 33,205,113 32,840,147 Amortization on other assets 149,268 415,559 1 Amortization of excess purchase once over book value on led acquired assets(notes 5 and 8) 657709 657 709 Operating Income(loss) M&1152,6611 f12.B20.2241 I I Non-operating revenues: llr4 Property taxes 27.285,629 35,854,464 Interest 18,499,786 33,226,317 Federal and state grant revenue 203,921 - j I Other 2.173.762 8.450d4] lam' Total non-operating revenue 48.163 098 75930 we 1 Nonopera0ng expenses: y Interest 23,940,800 16,953,574 Other 828218 i413f160 I ' Total non-operating expenses 24161.018 19,377,654 1, i Income before extraordinary loss on extinguishment ks ofdebt 4,543,412 43.333,170 Extraordinary loss on extinguishment of debt(note 4) 6 029 594 Net income 4,543,412 37,304.576 I Add depredation and amortization related to contributed equity I (notes 5 and 8) 732 782 732,792 60 Net Increase in retained earnings 5,276,194 38,037,358 li Retained earnings,beginning of year,as restated(note 11) 625 714.140 587A76182 41 Retained earnings,end of year(note 11) S 830.990.334 625.714.140 I Li See accompanying notes to combined financial statements. 6 L COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Combined Statements of Cash Flows .y For the years ended June 30, 1995 and 1994 m 1995 7994 Cash flows from(used by)operating activities: `y Net cash provided(used)by operations $ (90,056,118) 19.863.570 Cash flows from noncapital financing activities: Proceeds from property taxes 27,285,629 36.854,484 m Federal and state grant revenue 203,921 - Other non-operating revenue 2,173,762 6,450,147 Other nonopereting expenses (701,502) (2,413,980) Net cash provided by noncapital financing activities 28.961.810 39.890,651 Cash flows from(used by)capital and related financing activities: Additions to property,plant and equipment (33,478,174) (48,935,836) Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized (25,438,739) (21,006,116) Principal payments on taxable commercial paper (50,000.000)principal payments on certificates of participation (9,655,000) (54,925,866) Principal payments on bonds (15,000) (15,000) Proceeds from issuance of taxable commercial paper - 6010001000 m Proceeds from issuance of certificates of participation - 44,438,259 Proceeds from capital contributions 23,367,021 12 783.096 Net cash provided(used)by capital and related financing activities (95.2198921 (17,661,463) Cash flows from imresfing activities: Decrease(increase)in investments 104,871,526 (51,606,936) Interest received 20.427,971 32,091,428 Increase(decrease)in obligation under reverse repurchase ,m agreement (91,811000)000) 42 313 000 _ Net cash provided by investing activities 33486497 22,797,492 m Net increase(decrease)in cash and cash equivalents (123,827,703) 64,890,250 Cash and cash equivalents,beginning of year 472,247,222 407,356 QZ2 a Cash and cash equivalents,end of year $349.419.519 472.247.222 .., (Continued) m _ See accompanying notes to combined financial statements. 7 L COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Combined Statements of Cash Flows(Continued) For the years ended June 30, 1995 and 1994 r' L 1995 1994 Cash flows from operating activities: V Operating income(loss) $(18,852,668) (12.820.224) Adjustments to reconcile operating income(loss) to net cash provided by operations: Depreciation 33,280.186 32,915,220 y Amortization 806,977 1,073,268 Changes in assets and liabilities: Decrease(increase)in accounts receivable (5,143,845) (954,254) Decrease(increase)in due from other districts 8.948,250 (21,873) Decrease(increase)in due from other governmental agencies (97,706,280) (6,364956) c Decrease(increase)in other receivables 3.213.389 938:881 V Decrease(increase)in inventories (214.943) (568,421) Decrease(increase)in prepaid and other assets (1,040,295) (471,452) Decrease(increase)in other assets,net of y amortization (912,642) (1,645,835) Increase(decrease)in accounts payable 629,791 (835,040) c Increase(decrease)in accrued expenses (2,867,926) 4,696,059 Increase(Decrease)in retentions payable (657,066) (109,509) Increase(decrease)in deposits (278.733) 2,217,854 Increase(decrease)in due to other ) ! districts (8,954,781) 21.873 jr,( Increase(decrease)in compensated absences (502,205) 290,858 Increase(decrease) in deferred compensation payable 52,379 1,276,246 Increase(decrease)in claims and judgments �I payable 167,283 (642,433) Increase(decrease)in defamed revenue (22,789) 1132 6921 1 Net cash provided by operations $(90.058.1181 19.863.570 Lr Ir L 1 L See accompanying notes to combined financial statements. M 8 L COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1995 and 1994 f11 Summary of Significant Accountinc Policies Reporting Entity The financial statements of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (Districts) include the operations of nine separate Districts operating within the County of Orange, California. The Districts jointly own and operate certain sewage treatment and disposal facilities for the benefit of residents of Orange County, California. The Districts are managed by a joint administrative •" organization composed of directors appointed by the Districts. Each individual District is governed by a board consisting of the mayor, or a designee,of each of the cities, or a representative from the local sewering district within the District and a member of the Board of Supervisors. The Districts b utilize joint operating, working capital and capital outlay accounts to pay joint operating and construction costs, which costs are subsequently allocated to the Districts based on gallons of - sewage flow. The Districts' balance sheets reflect the allocated balance sheet accounts of the joint t operating,working capital and capital outlay funds. -- The Districts are independent of and overlap many formal political jurisdictions. There are many governmental entities, including the County of Orange, that operate within the Districts' 'd jurisdictions; however, financial information for these entities is not included in the accompanying financial statements based on the following provisions of Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement 14: .� • Each entity has an independent elected governing body. • Each entity is solely responsible for its daily operations. • The Districts are neither entitled to operating surpluses nor responsible for operating deficits of any of the entities. • Each entity is exclusively responsible for administration of its own fiscal affairs. .• Basis of Account no Each of the Districts operates as an enterprise activity. Enterprise funds account for operations that are financed and operated in a manner similar to private business enterprises, where the intent of the Board of Directors is that the costs (expenses, including depreciation and amortization) of - providing services to the general public on a continuing basis be financed or recovered primarily through user charges. . _ Basis of accounting refers to when revenues and expenses are recognized in the accounts and reported in the financial statements. All enterprise funds are accounted for on the flow of economic resources measurement focus and use the accrual basis of accounting. Their revenues are recognized when they are earned, and their expenses are recognized when they are incurred. "- Unbilled sewer service receivables are recorded at year end. m Operating Plans Each year, Districts'staff prepare annual operating plans for each District. These annual operating plans, as adopted by the respective Boards of Directors, are used to serve as a basis for monitoring financial progress, estimating the levy and collection of taxes and determining future (Continued) - 9 L COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY V Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1995 and 1994 L service charge rates. During the year, these plans may be amended as circumstances or levels of operations dictate. Cash Equivalents Investments with original maturities of three months or less are considered cash equivalents. 66 Investments Investments are stated at cost except for assets of the deferred compensation plan which are 1M carried at market value. When market values decline below cost, no loss is recorded if such declines are considered temporary. The Districts' policy is to hold investments until maturity, or until market values equal or exceed cost. t Inventory Inventory is stated at the lower cost or market on a first-in, or first-out basis. W Prop . Plant and Equipment V Outlays for property, plant, equipment and construction in progress are recorded in the respective Districts. Such outlays may be for either individual District assets or their respective share of joint ) assets. yrr Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost, except for assets acquired by contribution, which are recorded at fair market value at the time received. Cost includes labor; materials; outside services; vehicle and equipment usage; allocated indirect charges such as engineering, purchasing, supervision and other fringe benefits; and certain administrative and general expenses. Net interest costs are capitalized on projects during the construction period (see note 3). L, Depreciation of plant and equipment is provided for over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets using the straight-line method. The Districts generally follow the guidelines of estimated useful lives as recommended in the State of California Controllers Uniform System of Accounts for Waste Disposal Districts, which range from 3 to 75 years. Depreciation expense related to contributed plant and equipment is charged to contributed facilities. I Amortization {■I Amortization of other assets and excess purchase price over book value of joint assets acquired is provided using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives of 5 and 30 years, respectively. Discounts on the certificates of participation are amortized to interest expense over the respective j terms of the installment obligations based on their effective interest rates(note 4). b' When certificates of participation have been refunded in a transaction accounted for as an in- substance defeasance, the related portion of the discount, acquisition costs and deferred gain or 1L loss on terminated interest rate swaps are written off at the date of the refunding and classified as (Continued) 10 lr COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1995 and 1994 an extraordinary hem in the accompanying combined statement of revenues, expenses, and changes in retained earnings(note 4). Restricted Assets Certain assets are restricted to comply with debt service and capital project requirements. Specifically, the assets are restricted for the purposes of installment payments due on certificates of participation,joint treatment works expansion and capital expenditures for improvements. Interest Rate Swaps The Districts enter into interest rate swap transactions in connection with the issuance of ,e certificates of participation as part of their overall financing program. These interest rate swaps are accounted for as hedges, and the associated interest rate differential to be paid or received is accrued as interest rates change and is amortized to interest expense over the terms of the swap agreement Gains or losses on terminated interest rate swaps are deferred and amortized to interest expense over the remaining terms of the swap agreements, although the amortization may _. be accelerated in the case of a refunding of the related certificates of participation in a transaction accounted for as an in-substance defeasance(see discussion in Amortization above). m Compensated Absences ® The Districts' employees, other than operations and maintenance personnel, are granted vacation and sick leave in varying amounts with maximum accumulations of 200 hours and 560 hours for vacation and sick days earned but unused, respectively. Operations and maintenance personnel accrue"Personal Leave" at a rate of between 60 and 200 hours per year depending on years of service. Personal leave can be accumulated up to a maximum of 400 hours. Vacation and sick leave benefits and personal days are recorded when earned in the accompanying Districts' financial statements under the caption "Compensated absences" In determining the estimated sick leave liability at June 30 of each year, the Districts assume that all employee accumulated sick leave balances will ultimately be paid out Claims and Judgments The Districts records estimate losses, net of any insurance coverage under its sell-insurance program (see Self-Insurance Plans below) when it is probable that a claim liability has been a. incurred, and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Claims payable,which includes an estimate for'incurred but unreported claims", is recorded in each of the Districts'funds. Property Taxes Property taxes attach an enforceable lien on property as of March 1. Taxes are levied on July 1 and are payable in two installments which become delinquent after December 10 and April 10. The G County bills and collects the property taxes and remits them to the Districts in installments during the year. Districts property tax revenues are recognized when levied to the extent that they are available to finance current operations. c, (Continued) -- 11 iy COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY V Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1995 and 1994 L The County is permitted by State law (Proposition 13) to levy taxes at 1% of full market value (at time of purchase) and can increase the assessed value no more than two percent per year. The Districts receive a share of this basic levy proportionate to what was received in the 1976 to 1978 L period. Joint Operations y; The Districts are co-participants in an agreement dated March 10, 1971, as amended July 1, 1985, which provides for the joint construction, ownership and operetton of certain treatment and disposal ! property, plant, equipment and other assets. Under the agreement, the respective District equity N' percentages in jointly owned assets are based on gallons of sewage flow. Equity percentages are determined at the end of each fiscal year and prevail for the ensuing year. Construction costs of jointly owned assets are allocated to the various individual Districts. Joint 6r operating expenses are allocated to the Districts based on gallons of sewage flow during the year. Payroll, related benefits and certain overhead items are allocated to the individual Districts based primarily on direct labor hours. Deferred Compensation Plan f The Districts offers its employees a deferred compensation plan established in accordance with Internal Revenue Code Section 457. The plan permits all employees of the Districts to defer a portion of their salary until future years. The amount deferred is not available to employees until y termination, retirement, death or for unforseeable emergency. All amounts of compensation deferred under the plan, all property and rights purchased with those amounts and all income attributable to those amounts, property or rights are (until paid or made available to the employee or other beneficiary)solely the property and rights of the Districts(without being restricted to the provisions of benefits under the plan), subject only to the claims of the Districts' general creditors of the Districts in an amount equal to the fair market value of the deferred account for each participant. For certain key employees (General Manager and Department Heads), the Districts have agreed to contribute an amount not to exceed 3% of their gross annual salaries, provided the employees voluntarily contribute an equal or greater sum. In addition, the Districts have agreed to contribute an amount not to exceed 3% of gross annual salaries, which does not require matching contributions by the employee. For certain employees (Assistant Department Heads), the Districts have agreed to contribute an amount not to exceed 2% of their gross annual salaries, provided the employees voluntarily contribute an equal or greater b sum. In addition, the Districts have agreed to contribute an amount not to exceed 2-112% of gross annual salaries,which does not require matching contributions by the employee. For certain other employees(Supervisors), the Districts have agreed to contribute an amount not to exceed 1%of their gross annual salaries, provided the employees voluntarily contribute an equal or greater sum. In addition, the Districts have agreed to contribute an amount not to exceed 2% of gross annual salaries,which does not require matching contributions by the employee. Earnings generated by the plan are nontaxable to the employees until received, which occurs after I retirement, termination, or District action approving withdrawal. Funds are invested for the L participants, with earnings thereon accruing to the benefit of each participant in proportion to his or her investment. The Districts have no liability for losses under the plan but do have the duty of due I (Confined) 12 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1995 and 1994 care that would be required of an ordinary prudent investor. The Districts believe that it is unlikely that they will use the assets to satisfy claims of general creditors in the future. Assets of the plan, stated at market value, totaled $5,976,593 and $5,924,214 at June 30, 1995 and 1994, respectively. m, Self-Insurance Plans For the year ended June 30, 1995, the Districts were self-insured for workers' compensation, property damage and general liability. The self-insurance portion of workers' compensation is $260,000 per person per occurrence with outside excess insurance coverage to the statutory limit. The self-insured portion for property damage covering fire, flood, and other perils is $25,000 per occurrence with outside excess insurance coverage to $200 million for flood, fire and other perils. G The self-insured portion for property damage covering earthquakes is $250,000 or 5% per unit of insurance, whichever is greater, with outside insurance coverage to$30 million. The Districts also maintain outside comprehensive boiler and machinery insurance with a$100 million per occurrence combined limit with deductibles ranging from $25,000 to $100,000. The Districts are completely self-insured for general liability coverage. As of February 1, 1994, the Districts obtained outside insurance coverage for group medical claims and are no longer self-insured. Districts' management believes that there are no unrecorded claims as of June 30, 1995 that would materially affect the financial position of the Districts. Claims against the Districts are processed by outside insurance administrators. These claims are charged to claims expense based on amounts which will ultimately be paid. Claims incurred but not yet reported have been considered in determining the accrual for loss contingencies. - Insurance expense is allocated to the individual Districts based on wastewater flow. Contributed Ecuity Connection fees represent fees received from developers and residents to join new or extend existing trunk sewer systems in excess of the cost to connect. Capital replacement charges represent fees charged to certain special districts and agencies for their proportionate share of - - fixed asset expenditures. Connection fees and capital replacement charges are recorded as contributed equity. Reclassifications .-� Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior year statements for comparison purposes. - (2) Cash and Investments The Districts follows the practice of pooling cash and investments of all funds except for cash held by trustees, and amounts in the deferred compensation plan. Interest income eamed on pooled cash and investments is allocated quarterly to the various funds _ based on month-end cash and investment balances. Interest income from cash and investments of funds excluded from pooled cash is credited directly to the related fund. (Continued) 13 II COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Yr! Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1995 and 1994 , Deposits IL' Deposits in banks are maintained in financial institutions which provide deposit protection on the L bank balance from the Federal Depository Insurance Corporation.The California Government Code requires California banks and savings and loans to secure local government deposits by pledging government securities equal to 110%of the deposits or by pledging first trust deed mortgage notes V equal to 150%of the deposits. Deposits are categorized herein, in accordance with Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 3, to give an indication of the level of credit risk assumed by the Districts at to year-end. Category 1- Insured or collateralized with securities held by the Districts or by its agent in the Districts'name. Category 2- Collateralized with securities held by the financial institution's trust department or agent in the Districts' name. Category 3- Uncollateralized or collateralized but the pledged securities are not held in the Districts' name. Restricted investments, as classified on the balance sheet, are in reserve Ponds held by Texas !, Commerce Bank and State Street Bank as specified in the trust agreements (note 4). At June 30, y 1995 and 1994,these investments were limited to deposits within bank investment contracts (BIC). Although the BIC with State Street Bank is classified as Category 3, as shown below, the depositor,AIG Matched Funding Corporation, is required to pledge collateral in an amount equal to 103% of the amount of the investment contract if the long-term unsecured, unsubordinated debt securities of AIG falls below a S&P rating of"AA-"or below a Moody's rating of"Aa3". Investments 4gJ Statutes authorize the Districts' to invest in obligations of the U.S. Government; state and local governmental agencies; negotiable certificates of deposits; bankers acceptance; commercial ty paper, reverse repurchase agreements; and a variety of other investment instruments which are allowable per the California Govemment Code. Investments are categorized herein, in accordance with GASB Statement No. 3, to give an indication of the level of credit risk assumed by the Districts at year-end. Category 1- Insured or registered, or securities held by the Districts or their agent in the Districts'name. Category 2- Uninsured and unregistered, with securities held by the purchasing financial institutions'trust department or agent in the Districts' name. Category 3- Uninsured and unregistered, with securities held by the purchasing financial institutions'trust department or agent but not in the Districts'name. I 14 y COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Notes to Combined Financial Statements -' June 30, 1995 and 1994 —. The Districts invest in overnight repurchase agreements in order to maximize the yield on funds on deposit as a result of outstanding warrants. At June 30, 1995, the Districts total demand cash accounts of$428,310 are reflected by demand cash bank balances of $165,167 and repurchase agreement bank balances of$820,000. ®, Investments Not Subject to Categorization Investments in the California Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) and the Orange County Investment Pool (OCIP) are not categorized, as GASB Statement No. 3 does not require m categorization of Investment pools managed by another government. Also funds on deposit within the Districts' Deferred Compensation Plan and cash held by trustees are also not categortzed because the underlying assets of the funds are invested within open-ended mutual funds. d Decisions regarding these investments are made by fiscal agents for the Districts who are acting in accordance with agreements entered into with the Districts. All such investments are not required to be categorized under interpretive guidelines issued by GASS. m At June 30, 1995, market value of LAW was$27,116,056,206. The Districts'proportionate share of that value is$25,006,216. Included in LAIF's investment portfolio are certain derivative securities in the form of structured notes, totaling $826,200,000, and asset-backed securities, totaling $333.672,000. LAIF's, and the Districts',exposure to credit, market, or legal risk is not available. A summary of deposits and investments were categorized as follows: June 30 1995 _ CanvIna Amount Bank Unrestricted Restricted Balance Cateoory Deposits: Demand cash accounts $ 183.902 244,408 149,027 1 - Bank Investment Contracts- -with Texas Commerce Bank - 4,482,934 4,482,934 1 -with State Street Bank 15,010,500 15,010,500 3 Total Deposits 183,902 19737.842 $19.642.461 Market u Valua Investments: Repurchase agreement - - 820,000 3 Cash and investments with LAW 11,197,861 13,698,810 24,896,671 N/A �✓ Cash and investments with OCIP 412,190 9,236 421,426 N/A U.S.Treasury Bills 137.802,871 168,579,989 306,714,408 3 Cash held by trustees - 11,313.656 11,313.656 N/A _ Deferred compensation 6,976,596 5,976696 N/A Total Investments 155,389,518 193,601.691 $350A42.757 Total Carrying Amount $155.573.420 213.339.533 ® Cash and cash equivalents and investments as reported on the combined balance sheet: Cash and cash equivalents $149,596,827 193,846.099 •? Cash held with fiscal agents 6,976,593 - Investments 19,493,434 -- $155,573,420 213.339.533 -- 15 i� COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1995 and 1994 Ir� June 30, 1994 ly Canvina Amount Bank Unrestricted Restricted Balance Cateaory Deposits: Demand cash accounts $ 11,306 109,590 128,728 1 Bank Investment Contracts- with Texas Commerce Bank - 8,976,475 8.976.475 1 with State Street Bank 15,388,485 15.388.485 3 Total Deposits 11,308 24A74.550 $24.493.688 Market Value Investments: Cash and investments with OCIP 183,334,032 263,690,447 See Note 13 N/A Cash held by trustees - 19,177,633 19,177,633 N/A Deferred compensation 5,924,214 - 5,924,214 N/A tL, Total Investments 189,258,246 282,868080 s Total Carrying Amount $189,269,552 307.342.630 Y Cash and cash equivalents and investments as reported on the combined balance sheet: � Cash and cash equivalents $183.345,338 282,977.670 Cash held with fiscal agents 5,924,214 Investments - 24.364.960 $189,269,552 307.342.630 Reverse Repurchase Agreement d The 53600 series of the State of California Government Code permits the Districts to enter into j reverse repurchase agreements, that is, a sale of securities with a simultaneous agreement to W repurchase them in the future at the same price plus a contract rate of interest. Substantially all reverse repurchase agreements are made with SEC-registered securities brokerages. The proceeds from these agreements may be used to invest in securities permissible under Government Code Section 53635, primarily U.S. Treasury and U.S. agency obligations, commercial paper and certificates of deposit. The market value of the securities underlying reverse repurchase agreements normally exceeds the cash received, providing the dealers a margin against a decline in market value of the securities. If the dealers default on their obligations to resell these securities to the Districts or provide securities or cash of equal value, the Districts would suffer an economic loss equal to the difference between the market value plus accrued interest of the underlying securities and the L 16 L ® COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1995 and 1994 agreement obligation, including accrued interest This credit exposure was approximately $4,800,000 at June 30, 1994. There was no credit exposure at June 30, 1995 due to the ,. termination of the reverse repurchase agreements in January 1995. Following is a summary of the reverse repurchase agreements as of June 30, 1994: a Agreement Underlying Securities $46,813,000 received,to be $50,000,000 mortgage backed repaid with interest of 4.19% securities with a coupon rate of _. on July 27, 1994 5.10% maturing on April 28. 1998 .y $45,000,000 received,to be $50,000,000 mortgage backed repaid with interest of 4.30% securities with a coupon rate of on August 1, 1994 4.94% maturing on November 30, 1998 -- At June 30, 1994, the agreements were collateralized by $8,187.000 of the Districts commingled funds held by the County of Orange. ti (31 Propeft Plant. Equipment and Construction in Progress Respective District ownership in jointly owned and separately owned property, plant, equipment and construction in progress,at cost,at June 30, 1995 and 1994 follows: _. Property. Plant and Enuipment 1995 MA District Jointly Separately No. Owned Owned Total To[al 1 $ 65,484,523 7,054,160 72,538,683 71,532,357 2 196,054,032 97,426,183 293,480,216 289,780,743 3 202,915,618 62,706,381 265,621,999 269,109,797 'd 5 24,048.645 34,646,296 58,694,941 58,380,925 _ 6 31,243,180 4,320,543 35,563,723 35,671,328 7 55,891,945 37,741,469 93,633,414 87,545,959 11 42,102,182 19,229.323 61,331,505 58,899,685 13 6,395,459 2,616,757 9,012,216 8,535,816 14 42.168.194 19,389,002 61,557,196 61,958.613 666,303.778 285-130-114 95JA33.892 941,415,223 a (Continued) 17 ii v COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 6W Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1995 and 1994 Construction in Progress 1995 1994 IW District Jointly Separately jfe, Owned Owned Total Total i 1 $ 8.814,734 - 8,814.734 8,016,364 2 23,753,523 189,466 23,942.989 22,541,090 3 23.593.463 4,041.223 27,634.686 21.499,777 5 3,346,919 32,828 3,379.747 3.473,398 y 6 3,223,724 1,353,534 4,577.258 3,235,232 7 5,606,371 3.105,346 8.711.717 5,498,071 11 4,223,663 4,415,217 8,638,880 6,608,137 V 13 501,977 - 501,977 375,649 14 3.309,554 5,922,851 9,232,405 3,857,417 I 76,373,928 %060.465 95,434,393 75,005,135 Total property, plant and equipment $742,677,706 304.190.579 1.046.868.285 1,016.420,358 For the years ended June 30, 1995 and 1994, the Districts capitalized net construction period L+ Interest cost, included in construction in progress,as follows: 1995 1994 t,r Dlshict Capitalized Capitalized No. Interest Interest 1 $ - 145.807 2 - 369,816 3 - 454,472 , 5 �. 6 - 93,764 7 - 108,476 11 - 184,196 13 - - 14 $ - 1.356.531 t41 Long-Term Debt The following is a summary of the changes in long-term debt for the year ended June 30, 1995: L (Continued) jr 18 V ® COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Notes to Combined Financial Statements -- June 30, 1995 and 1994 Balance Balance r July 1, June 30, 1994 Additions Deletions 1995 4 Compensated absences $ 3,058,308 - 502,205 2,556,103 Claims and judgments payable 374,400 167,283 - 541,683 Taxable commercial payable 50,000,000 - 50,000,000 - _ General obligation bonds 75,000 - 15,000 60,000 Certificates of participation 428.030.000 - 9,655,000 418.375.000 Totals $ 481.537.708 167,283 60,172,205 421.532.786 Compensated Absences The Districts' policies related to compensated absences are described in Note 1. This liability will be paid in future years from future resources: $2.556.103 Claims and Judgments Payable The Districts are self-insured in a number of areas as described in Note 1: $541,683 Less current portion: 162,506 Total long-term 5379.177 General Obligation Bonds 1958 District No. 11 General Obligation Bonds with interest at 1% payable in w annual installments of$15,000 to maturity in January 1999: $60,000 Less current portion: 15,000 Total long-term 5 OOQ Certificates of Participation tionn V The Districts issue certificates of participation in order to finance their respective share of the construction scheduled at the jointly owned treatment facilities. Each certificate of participation represents a direct and proportionate interest in the semi-annual interest payments. Each district is responsible for its own installment payment and is not obligated for any other District's payments. Installment payments for the issues are payable from any source of lawfully available funds of the Districts. All of the Districts certificates of participation are 25-year issuances except for the 1993 Refunding Certificates of Participation which is a 23-year issuance. Certificates of participation at (Continued) 19 u COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1995 and 1994 ll June 30, 1995 are summarized as follows: I` 1990-1992 Series A Certificates of Participation $ 94,300.000 UI 1990-1992 Series B Certificates of Participation 32,670,000 1990-1992 Series C Certificates of Participation 95,600,000 i 1892 Refunding Certificates of Participation 160,105.000 1993 Refunding Certificates of Participation 45.700.000 Total certificates of participation 418,375,000 Less: current portion 10,165.000 unamortized discount 1 Z24.197 } y Total long-term $406.485.803 1986 Certificates of Partic am lion L On August 13, 1986, Districts Numbers 1, 2 and 3 completed the sale of $117,000,000 of certificates of participation. Interest payments were due February 1 and August 1, beginning February 1, 1987. Annual principal payments were due August 1, beginning August 1, 1988. In December 1992, the entire remaining principal balance of the certificates was refunded with a portion of the proceeds of the December 1992 Refunding Certificates of Participation (see below) in f r, a transaction accounted for as an in-substance defeasance. 1990-1992 Series A Certificates of Participation On December 5, 1990, all Districts completed the sale of $100,000,000 of certificates of participation. Interest payments are due monthly beginning January 1991. The interest rate on the certificates is adjusted by the remarketing agent daily based on market interest rates. The weighted average interest rate for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1995 was 3.8%. Annual principal payments were due August 1, beginning August 1, 1991, All principal and interest payments are to be secured by nine separate irrevocable letters of credit iw issued by National Westminster Bank. The letters of credit will expire on December 15, 2000, unless earlier terminated. The Districts have the option of prepaying certificates in whole or in part at an amount equal to the principal plus accrued interest, if any,without premium. 1990-1992 Series B Certificates of Part ic' aOLtion On May 1, 1991, Districts Numbers 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 completed the sale of$117,555,000 of certificates of participation. Interest payments are due February 1 and August 1 of each year. The weighted average Interest rate for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1995 was 6.86%. Annual principal payments were due August 1, beginning August 1, 1992. The certificates were issued with an original issue discount of$3,731,496. The trust agreement for the certificates established a reserve fund equal to $7,369,539, which was LI funded from certificate proceeds and is being held by Texas Commerce Bank, the trustee (note 2). (Continued) L 20 V COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Notes to Combined Financial Statements - June 30, 1995 and 1994 In addition, Federal Guaranty Insurance Company provides municipal bond insurance for the certificates. In December 1992, $38,350,000 of the outstanding principal balance of the certificates was refunded with a portion of the proceeds of the December 1992 Refunding Certificates of Participation(see below)in a transaction accounted for as an in-substance defeasance. In September 1, 1993, $39,740,000 of the outstanding principal balance of the certificates was refunded from the proceeds of the September 1993 Refunding Certificates of Participation (see below)in a transaction accounted for as an in-substance defeasance. In May 1991, the Districts and a brokerage company entered into an interest rate exchange swap m, agreement pursuant to which the Districts paid a floating interest rate equal to the J.J. Kenny (High Grade) Index plus 1.19% and received a fixed interest rate of 5.56% on a notional amount of $111,837,000. The swap agreement was terminated in November 1992. The resulting gain of $5,174,102 was deferred and was amortized to interest expense over the original term of the agreement and there is no deferred swap gain remaining. 1990-1992 Series C Certificates of Participation c, On September 1, 1992, Districts Numbers 1, 2, 3,6, 7 and 11 completed the sale of$98,500,000 of certificates of participation. Interest payments are due monthly, beginning October 7, 1992. The ^, interest rate on the certificates is adjusted by the remarketing agent daily based on market interest rates. The weighted average interest rate for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1995 was 3.7%. Annual principal payments were due August 1, beginning August 1, 1993. The trust agreement for the certificates established a reserve fund equal to$9.850,000, which was ... funded from certificate proceeds and is being held by State Street Bank, the trustee(note 2). December 1992 Refunding Certificates of Partic' ain tion On December 3, 1992, Districts Numbers 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 completed the sale of $160,600,000 of refunding certificates of participation. The interest rate on the refunding certificates is adjusted by the remarketing agent daily based on market interest rates. Annual principal payments were due August 1, beginning August 1, 1993. On October 1, 1992, the Districts and a brokerage company entered into an interest rate exchange swap agreement pursuant to which the Districts will pay a fixed interest rate of 5.55%and receive a -- variable interest rate based on a tax exempt daily interest rate as determined by the remarketing agent on a notional amount of$160,600,000. This interest rate swap agreement is accounted for 'r as a hedge, and the associated interest rate differential to be paid or received is accrued as interest rates change and is amortized to interest expense over the tens of the swap agreement. The 20- year swap agreement matures on August 1,2013. r' The certificates were issued to refund the remaining outstanding principal balance of the 1986 certificates of participation and $38,350,000 of the outstanding principal balance of the 1990-92 Series B certificates of participation. The refunding qualifies as an in-substance defeasence with the proceeds being held in an irrevocable trust by an outside trustee to provide for all future debt service payments on both debt issues. Accordingly,the trust account assets and the liability for the (Continued) 21 i COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY V Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1995 and 1994 I J� defeased certificates of participation are not included in the Districts' combined financial statements. The aggregate principal amount of refunded debt outstanding at June 30, 1995 was $139,950,000. W September 1993 Refunding Certificates of Participation On September 2, 1993, Districts Numbers 1,2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 completed the sale of$46,000,000 of refunding certificates of participation. The interest rate on the refunding certificates is adjusted by the remarketing agent daily based on market interest rates. Annual principal payments are due August 1, beginning August 1, 1994. 4 On September 1, 1993, the Districts and a brokerage company entered into an interest rate exchange swap agreement pursuant to which the Districts will pay a fixed interest rate of 4.56% N and receive a variable interest rate based on a tax exempt daily interest rate as determined by the remarketing agent on a notional amount of $46,000,000. This interest rate swap agreement is accounted for as a hedge, and the associated interest rate differential to be paid or received is accrued as interest rates change and is amortized to interest expense over the term of the swap agreement. The 22-year swap agreement matures on August 1,2016. I The certificates were issued to refund $39,740,000 of the outstanding principal balance of the it 1990-92 Series B certificates of participation. The refunding qualifies as an in-substance defeasance with the proceeds being held in an irrevocable trust by an outside trustee to provide for all future debt service payments on both debt issues. Accordingly, the trust account assets and the liability for the defeased certificates of participation are not included in the Districts' combined financial statements. The Districts recognized an accounting loss of$6,028,594 on the refunding which was classified as V' an extraordinary item in the accompanying combined statement of revenues, expenses and changes in retained earnings. However, the Districts reduced their aggregate debt service payments by approximately $2,625,000 over the next 22 years and obtained an economic gain difference between the present values of the old and new debt service payments of approximately $3,647,000. The aggregate principal amount of refunded debt outstanding at June 30. 1995 was approximately$33,585,000. Annual Amortization Requirements The annual requirements to amortize all Districts' debt other than compensated absences and I ! claims and judgments payable as of June 30, 1995, including interest payments of$315,410,026, �w are as follows: General Certificates j Ohlioation Sends of Participation 41 Year ending June 30: 1996 $ 16,600 $34.608.100 1997 15,450 34.600,054 1998 15,300 34,492,420 1999 15,150 34,597,510 I 2000 - 34,627,746 Thereafter 560,957,696 $ 61.soe 733.783.52fi r (Continued) v 22 W COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1995 and 1994 (5) Contributed Equity The following is a summary of the changes in contributed capital for the year ended June 30, 1995 and 1994, respectively: w Cliteltal ow. CdO- reBOn Anwe bWne o hvm al CorFet ephicaphal Depmtlebon Ranh Purt(We Fude Rnuart on Wder Pdre Over Balanolk ulvl'195 eense hero CPaolm,etl Matedtwo Book Value Balm®el Evenna9tl f,BBD)BB prole Bl lnMa Bl Jul.loBs m Ousted No.1 3 4.r5.43 36.111,111 74,336 - - 5,657,627 District No.2 38,470,631 3,682,1182 2,414,0,13 - - - 42,767,460 DI.Wd No 24.228,147 1,288,42 2.383,710 - - 27.850.539 Dadet No.5 12,130,1129 (255,288) 267,828 - 061,426 - 12,808,063 r, DlsMd No 4,751,877 20,015 M.0,13 - - 5.157.535 Dstrld No 14,30.276 1,060.40 651,402 (76,M) - - 16,857,052 Dlelrid No.11 11,666,749 132,64 460,74 - - - 12,260,200 Dbtld No.13 8.109,5N 427,700 70,628 - 6,802,173 I)Wct No.14 74.373J43 480.442 6 042,916 185)701 81A47.792 Total 318889]B]e H3 z= y A60]]1 ]]Bq 36l B3C 7,7➢B) 2103Ss57 ti capital Conte- Amort4 bubona Mod from of uAne Ekceea Connecllon Capllal Depraeation Pence Purtbaee Fees Replace- on water Price Over Belanreet Eamed anent conbledual DISMot Book Value Belanpe at Jul 1.1993 Mulaoraedt charade FadlMle (cote 0l meta B) June 30.ION °j Deetdd No,1 3 4,512,5117 37,511 224,945 - - - 4,75,443 D'utnd No,2 N,802,257 2,07A35 661,038 - - - 30.470.531 Mudd No.3 22,433,815 1,075,470 718.031 - - 24,228,147 District No 11,00,915 217,800 80,419 - $89.408 - 12.138.828 w Dispkl No.6 4.07.477 4,4N 113,BBB - - - 4,751.877 District No 13,764,430 637,673 173,24 (75,073) - - 14,39D,276 Meld No.fl 11,132,028 208,647 M.173 - - - 11,08.749 DIaMd No.13 6,458,654 a37,Ba5 0.50 - B,iO3,BN Disted No,14 A940692 147741 S,398,619 (4J`S9@) 74372/43 t Total 3]ZSlt� 6.1y 701 9�I]11 (75.07 6.833.01 (637,7.eB) ]BB9➢Lg33 (6) Joint ODerating Fund Expense Allocation The Districts utilize joint operating,working capital and capital outlay accounts to pay joint operating and construction costs, which are subsequently allocated to the Districts based on gallons of sewage flow. A summary of joint operating costs follows: r, (Continued) 23 L I ' COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY V Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1995 and 1994 I 1995 1994 Revenue: Service charges $ 2.617,227 $2,492,026 Other 2.032.288 2.301,128 Total revenue 4,649,516 4.793,154 Expenses: Salaries and benefits 26,861,439 24,715,430 •' Supplies 4,862,123 4,425,889 Contractual 8,624,455 7,051,638 Repairs and maintenance 3,407,073 3,080,498 V Utilities 2,630,013 4,041.977 Other 5.896.900 4.331,986 ) Total expenses 51,282,003 47.627.418 Net joint operating expenses $46,632,488 $ M� (7) Pension Plan The Districts participate in the Orange County Employee's Retirement System ("OCERS"), a U cost-sharing multiple-employer, defined benefit pension plan. OCERS was established in 1945 under the provisions of the County Employees Retirement Law of 1937, and provides members with retirement, death, disability, and cost-of-living benefits. The payroll of employees covered by OCERS was $26,474,828 for the year ended June 30, 1995 and $27,704,833 for the year ended June 30, 1994;the Districts'total payroll was$28,560,787 in 1995 and$28,692,733 in 1994. Benefits All District full-time employees participate in OCERS. Employees who retire at or after age 50 with ten or more years of service are entitled to an annual retirement allowance. The amount of the retirement allowance is based upon the member's age at retirement, the member's "final compen- sation"as defined in Section 31462 of the Retirement Law of 1937, the total years of service under OCERS, and the employees' classification as a Tier I or Tier II member. Benefits fully vest on reaching five years of service. OCERS also provides death and disability benefits. Contributions Tier I and Ter II covered employees are required to contribute 4.89%- 7.51% and 6.66%-10.23%, `y respectively, of their annual compensation to OCERS. The Districts are required to make periodic contributions to OCERS in amounts that are estimated to remain a constant percentage of covered employees' compensation such that, when combined with covered employees' contributions, will fully provide for all covered employees' benefits by the time they refire. The contribution 111110 requirement for the years ended June 30, 1995 and 1994 were $3,005,892 and $2.530,869, 1 respectively, which consisted of $2,189,501 from the Districts and $816,391 from employees in LI 1995 and $1,779,310 from the Districts and $751,559 from employees in 1994. The Districts' contributions represented 8.3% and 6.4% of covered payroll and employees contributions represented 3.1%and 2.7%for the years ended June 30, 1995 and 1994, respectively. (Continued) V 24 I I u �., COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1995 and 1994 The Districts' contributions for the years ended June 30, 1995 and 1994 represented 3.1°/ and 2.8%of total contributions required of all participating entities, respectively. Pension Benefit Oblination The amount shown below as the"pension benefit obligation" is a standardized disclosure measure of the present value of pension benefits, adjusted for the effects of projected salary increases and step-rate benefits estimated to be payable in the future as a result of employee service to date. The measure, which is the actuarial present value of credited projected benefits, is intended to help users assess OCERS' funding status on a going-concem basis, assess progress made in accumulating sufficient assets to pay benefits when due, and make comparisons among other m public employees retirement systems and employers. OCERS does not make separate measurements of assets and pension benefit obligations for individual employers. The pension benefit obligation at December 31, 1994 for OCERS as a whole, determined through an actuarial y valuation performed as of that date, is as follows: December 31, 129A 1993 G (in thousands) Pension benefit obligation: Retirees and beneficiaries currently receiving benefits and terminated employees not yet receiving benefits $ 1,002.300 899,240 Active participants. Provided by employee contributions including allocated investment income 413,058 369,199 .+ Provided by employer contributions: Vested benefits 382,325 347,798 Nonvested benefits 416478 384,305 w Total pension benefit obligation 2,214,161 2,000,543 Net assets available for benefits, at market value 1498,489 2.226.442 Overfunded pension benefit obligation $ Actuarial Assumntions In 1992, several actuarial assumptions and methods changed. The mortality assumption was changed from the 1971 GAM Male Mortality to the 1983 GAM Male and Female Mortality. The -- assumed rates of withdrawal were reduced 15%. The unallocated Pond balance was decreased to 5% of fund assets with the decrease split 75% to County Advance Reserves and 25% to the Additional Retiree Benefit Account. The Board of Retirement elected to phase in these changes in assumptions over three years, beginning December 31, 1992. Under the new funding method, the r (Continued) 25 I t COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY it Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1995 and 1994 , , expected effect on the employer contribution rate is an increase in the contribution as employees reach retirement age. Significant actuarial assumptions used in the valuation include a rate of return of 8% and projected salary increases of 6.0% per annum per individual. li Historical Trend Information Ten-year historical trend information showing the OCERS' progress in accumulating sufficient assets to pay benefits when due is presented in the OCERS' December 31, 1994 annual financial report. (81 Transactions with Irvine Ranch Water District r District No. 14 The Districts formed Sanitation District No. 14 as a result of a negotiated Agreement between the V Districts and Irvine Ranch Water District("IRWD") as of July 1, 1985. Pursuant to the Agreement, IRWD paid the Districts $34,532,000 for an initial 15,000,000 gallons per day capacity in the } Districts' joint treatment facilities (with an ultimate collection rapacity of 32,000,000 gallons per r day), together with a pro-rate interest in real property based on flow of 32,000,000 gallons per day. The book value of the assets purchased by IRWD was determined to be $14,553,000 as of June 30. 1986. The excess of the purchase price over the assets' book value of$19,979,000 at June 30. 6d 1986 is being amortized over the remaining 30-year useful lives of the joint assets of District No. 14. As of June 30, 1995, $5,919,381 of the excess of purchase price over the assets' book value was amortized. 60 IRWD entered into a separate agreement with District No. 14 whereby IRWD agreed to annually fund payment of District No. 14's proportionate share of the Districts joint capital outlay revolving fund budget requirements and certain capital improvements during the term of the agreement, which contribution amounted to $6,942,916 in 1995 and $5,398,519 in 1994 (see note 5). The contributions are included as contributed equity in the accompanying combined balance sheet District No. 14's share of the joint capital outlay revolving fund budget is calculated, as discussed in note 1 under"Joint Operations," based on a minimum flow of fifteen million gallons per day. Once District No. 14's flow exceeds the per day minimum, the calculation will be based on actual flow. District No. 5 IRWD also entered into an agreement with District No. 5 to provide funding to District No. 5 for the construction costs of certain wastewater collection, transmission,treatment and disposal facilities to be used by IRWD (the"Downwast Agreement"). Such funding amounted to$851,425 in 1995 and $589,498 in 1994 and is included as contributed equity in the accompanying combined balance sheet. The agreement also provided that IRWD would not be required to pay connection fees , related to development in the Downwast Area(as defined in the Downwast Agreement). 40 (9) Interfund R ivabl rPavabl s j Interfund receivables and payables at June 30, 1995 and 1994 are as follows: L+ r (Continued) L 26 ' I W COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1995 and 1994 1995 1994 F110d Receivable Payable Receivable payable M District No. 1 $ - - 69,142 - District No. 2 - - 3,424.392 - ,�, District No. 3 - - 3,217.552 - District No. 5 - - 2.167,577 - District No. 7 - - 69,587 - District No. 9 - - - 3,081,235 District No. 11 - - - 2,868,793 District No. 13 - - - 839,383 District No. 14 - - 2,158,8399 d Total $ 8,948,250 8.948.250 (10) Segment Information The Districts consist of nine individual Districts that provide sewerage services and are financed primarily through user charges. Key financial data of the individual Districts, in thousands of dollars,are as follows for the years ended June 30, 1995 and 1994: Operating Depr. &Amort. Operating Net Fund Revenues PYmense Inc. (Low) Inc, (Lassl v District No. 1 $ 6,591 2.835 (2,036) (1,505) District No. 2 23,779 10,063 (4,549) 1,017 District No. 3 23,297 9,835 (2,395) 5,083 District No. 5 2,730 1,758 (1,493) 461 District No.6 3,732 1,457 253 1,106 District No.7 6.190 3,003 (1,768) 1,681 District No. 11 3,320 2,045 (2,728) (1,489) District No. 13 845 252 387 736 District No. 14 48 2,839 (4,523) (2,546) _ Net Ina.To Total Net Working Total Contrib. Capital Assets Capital E991pt District No. 1 $ 782 92,223 10,922 37,710 District No.2 6,297 379,870 46.798 235,218 District No. 3 3,653 366,173 61,417 229,460 District No. 5 860 83,499 13.250 58,755 District No.6 406 55.348 10,817 36,864 District No. 7 1,567 123,943 16.268 92,878 d District No. 11 593 87,554 11,531 59.906 District No. 13 498 18,824 1,525 18,331 District No. 14 6,776 75,394 2.268 72,196 (Continued) 27 L COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY L Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1995 and 1994 L 1994 Operating Depr. 8 Amort. Operating Net L Fund Revenues EsRen5e Inc. (Lpss) Inc, (Lossl L District No, 1 $ 7.121 2,839 (991) 950 District No, 2 24,318 10,747 (2,424) 10,339 District No. 3 22,885 9,093 (1,187) 4,146 District No. 5 3,063 975 308 3,228 b District No.6 3,585 970 265 2.522 District No.7 6,304 3,616 (2,655) 3.784 District No. 11 3,338 2,026 (1,429) 3,488 w District No. 13 831 426 (131) 1.286 District No. 14 3 3.296 (4,576) (2,568) L Net Incr. To Total Net Working Total Contrib. Capital Assets Capital Eaub. District No. 1 $ 262 108,594 13,545 38,090 District No.2 3,668 423,350 51.590 226,961 District No. 3 1,795 405,727 63,808 219,700 1 District No. 5 888 87,941 15,699 57,329 L District No.6 154 61,650 11,673 35,165 District No. 7 636 136,679 15,025 89,311 District No. 11 535 97,576 17,539 60,654 District No. 13 644 20,092 1,642 17,097 District No. 14 4,889 79,936 247 67,308 (11) Restatement of Retained Earnings Retained earnings for the year ended June 30, 1994 have been restated to reflect the recognition L of property tax revenues that were levied for the year ended June 30, 1994 and received within 60 days following year end. The effects of the restatement of retained earnings are as follows: U Retained earnings,June 30, 1994, as previously reported $622,717,250 Unrecorded property tax revenue 2.996,890 yr Retained earnings, June 30, 1994,as restated $625.714.140 ay (121 Other Reguired Individual Fund Disclosures District 14 has accumulated retained earnings deficits at June 30, 1995 and 1994 of $8,952,013 L and $7,063,904, respectively. These deficits are expected to be eliminated by revised service charges in future years. , (Continued) 28 L .� COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1995 and 1994 -d j131 Commitments and Contincencies Commitments At June 30, 1995, the Districts had commitments to pay in the future approximately $10,933,747 under current construction contracts on a progress payment basis as construction is completed. Contingencies On December 6, 1994, the County of Orange (County) and the Orange County Investment Pool ed (OCIP) filed petitions under Chapter 9 of the United States Bankruptcy code. The creditors of the OCIP are the participants therein, which include the County, over 180 other California political subdivisions, and certain individuals, most of which are located in Orange County. In addition, the creditors of the County include, among others, the holders of Orange County bonds, notes and other securities. The Districts' investment within the OCIP on December 6, 1994 was $454,291,774. A Comprehensive Settlement Agreement was offered by the County to the OCIP participants on March 26, 1995. OCIP participants were offered a choice between two options or outright rejection of the agreement The Districts' Board of Directors resolved to accept the agreement and elected .. the option described below at the Joint Boards of Directors meeting of April 12, 1995. The United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California approved the settlement entered into by and among the County, OCIP, and the OCIP participants on May 2, 1995. .� Under the option elected, the Districts received cash in the approximate amount of 77% of its investment balance as of December 6, 1994, together with certain notes and claims against the County for the balance of its investment, less approximately 1% to 2%withheld by certain brokers pending resolution of litigation. In return, the Districts released all litigation claims against the County and assigned all OCIP participant related claims against third parties to the County. On May 19, 1995, the Districts received a cash distribution that, together with previously released emergency withdrawals, approximated 77% of their December 6, 1994 investment balance. On June 19, 1995, the Districts received another 3% through proceeds of recovery notes sold in the public market by the County. Of the remaining 20%of the Districts' December 6, 1994 investment balance still owed by the County, 9% is to be repaid through the"Settlement Secured Claims" and 11% through "Repayment Claims", both issued by the County. The "Settlement Secured Claims" are secured by a first-priority security interest on 65% of net litigation proceeds recovered by the County through third-party defendants. The"Repayment Claims" are secured by a second-priority security interest on 65% of litigation recoveries by the County from third-party defendants. ,r Due to the uncertainty of when the remaining investment balances owed will be repaid by the County, the Districts' have recorded $96,281,062 as a long term receivable on their June 30, 1995 Balance Sheet. This amount represents 20% of non-recovered investment principal plus interest earnings for periods prior to the December 6 bankruptcy filing. No allowance for uncollectables has been established. 29 u u u u u u (THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK) u u u u u u u u L! 30 w COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY COMBINING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS w .y 31 OOBPT)MNiTAnox OIll I OF O04POE COOP)Y J.W.lm NINcmpB ..TCntlw Telw W Jum80.1BW OINw dwm OINM dwm OlwO G.ew d.0d Mind Ghwl tle.l tN.2 tlp.9 t1p.5 tiv.5 Go'..2 hwo ll t1O.11 Wp H lP➢3 lY@! cmam w: GNm0uNmuMlem i@.519.929 15,lm4l2 1locul J2d26221 _$92L$1 JS.WE5l2 J.RU075 1]Mw laWon 5W421,usa Cn.M1mIOMTMulogmt. � �)9 J.0.1J.591 � .0)+52 � Won 15ma ra Pw wemc gwlmh 1.1R0.%B aN5.191 ].wo., A]),07 4m,12015I.M 1,M M2 )0],m0 112.011 am,030 11,RBR.BIB 9,R0.,1T] AmuH lmeml 170,w B83.1B1 NO.NS IB1,B5] 161.]W aaB.01R iR).0)R 20.[W 21.619 2330.1]0 4.1a),217 preM1emetlW%wmmBrMl epOiMu 011,850 2,109.167 1.W8.530 RIM,w 323.613 4BB.857 aM.766 i].RaB aB.mO 0.R01.Y10 5.T0.f,i% 110,170 Tow 2,10.SN _5.lxpe10 aim M.02 W447i I"130 im, 11dAI ID.921 mmAOm 162T]m1 IBwnb0ae 470 M 114K I,IA745 i81.1 m 421.598 ULM a m 1WO72 AMI M 4516310 Pm%loom omrmeoh 185l3J 493mI -47a 1. ""s Sol 1387 MMI 15.11,17 _am im, ah.zal Towminm..nh I'MFM 49.116M 01147 . _13ANI Z 11.13B215 _10,913.zal ,2.07015 Imal ..11 1mmB]BO 210.Stlme PeOMwEeneh: G.M1wu.M1pukeloM 1%W1,,ON E&e10.am 6].B16,Nx 1],<)1,1<B B,MON 19.288,W 15.M.m B.W.Bm 1,69e.a11 Im,810.mB RBx,0P.0]0 Imm.Mmb ],m1,i1e ),]BB,eBB e.sa].Pob 1.laR.ROp .ma.WO mB.00B sO1.]]0 - - 194m,w .m. 00 m Ima.MgNwIN Wem - - - 1000 PewA.d AmueElmmM R3,SM 1.175.Bm w,i% 181.Bm 1M.w a53,810 I971ai0 11BR] W.Ba9 ],m8,14] ],BB]1xx0 GnnMlm lm. a.ON 3Y,]!b 16.)BI 25.010 - 172.210 - M,bx - 6xB.000 1,722,200 Oln cnnordww - B.BIBR50 wnn.m wmrpowmmnw Bp01q.. :31,B00 w.U'] w3m 16t,3x1 137,012 1BB,] 'N01 W,1T! ua.11x am]00B x,1a,]79 �Im w Bj2i aT 2716079 Tdtln.mome p..w NJ,, _JEm.� l.09215 MHM4M I&MM S1tOTH1 1.I0.SB1 zmwide lae 9m7 W'A.MBm WeM1wndMrpowTmMsl .pNmeAmwnani 6146913 Z&19.09 J.9591e3 119501@5 1.18157 1974 nxe 1m2 Mz0]am O Chmem =112 m m m 1o5 _1.49M loin 4 zno= 2827Mi IB W.Bi,q.m ms emlWm.nt n mrt tyq Sm,RRB 1,]eOia) 1,818AN M.M xw.LO] 1.813.w ..N) 41,010 am,OM i,1R1A)3 i,1m,w Sew0BBw10ctlan htlBW. BAa5,.11 MIM.%p M,001,01 SS,005,0W MI.M 0,]%,Rm MmMAW R,)m,C20 m.aee,m0 Ni.M),MB Rm,180,m[ 8we%boiNmmllWlltln VAMM 1Nola lli,lm,%1 12.M.Wl R3,ml. 'M M,e10,m1 80.mIlO <M0.010 a0A]x,181 M.MW.14%]R W.128,5R1 Sawpemepew lwlltl0s ],Bm.3M xaAplAm %A11.1L' 1.BpB.m1 3,]B1.BSt 0.iZ0A10 6.Mx,t10 109,M0 6,m1,0M M,1<8,000 BO,IRB,SBB oOnBnl B..m eN BGMmMnWa 1w1m. 8.20,M =,Ulm 2800R.aW aw5.0m a.BW.015 ]AttA1O S.�B W ri0,M3 5]01.1s3 w.lm].1 )B,SB it cmwm001Ip ft _1819T5! z)ex.� 77 asn z55 BIZ J.ii2d65 mAaaw ]Aooe.lae rw n%M.qem Bm .qulpimmi eumAn Sn,axa.xa xm.xse.w m,m2,eM M,149,m1 192,a55,131 M,9ro,sM 9A14,10 70,70,141 1,aM,MUM 1,01e,420,3M t....wmwhe e.0lw.M 227aSM N101.217 MINIM 131NNZ 102M23 2ON2453 ISM.122 1914'MI 15m.ZH 202,M401 2m.5%.Mz P.iwo%ftW .MBSmnm _WM412 2a2ul, 2Y025L)55 4SM01 10.40.742 M.1.im �51.10M 1M.80 1tmm mot Tm.9mw Ecw.a mr2mM%m oar trmh vNe pi [pY11MB.yy 140NSI 1405901B 147I7320 ONtl00.w.ME0.1.I.0..mNnAObE amm.mn �.I.M3 5 IMM7 14e w 02193 18.255 JR473 _9M m• z]exme Tewo.w. SW.222.922 m9, MBQW Sm,1MBm MAMMs MM� lm%]mB m�fifiM yglae`e M.3M.8]9 1202MOM 1421su.MB seee�nperc]19B ImBpeIlCBm0u0!bm'mmA. Fknnhn� 32 [ [ f [ [ C [ f _ f- [ C- [C .. [ E... C = H H fl H fl l H l [ fl H l H fl fl H H H H COUH UWATlox 015TWCt8 OF OPNIae wuN)V camemi,q B0lam sn.etlCn'wweal uw 30.tb5 WM CompmelFa T W 4 fa Jbre 30.11N0 oWh! Dw DM1 owme Ob wshle ON6YJ Om Dl.t tla1 nag tl0.1 tla5 tla8 tlaZ tla]I No.t3 No.la 15&` 1ffi9 C.raeGnin.pryeele mm a.Am n::ete: ]mvnts peyatk i L05,]0.5 t.5a0,0W n4lw t06,BJ3 1W.014 NO.7W M,w10.10 M.M 13a,05, a,b2,5]0 a,252.747 De'I pggnyy aB,361 nt.933 TN.)ox 82.BOt 100.Wa a1.]W 1b.t05 38.Bs5 bast za2tbta 5.209.6Go Depew zmTeII Tdtl amvG6GCJNef peymwrvan aasm row MGM 2318 2MQW4 v9 97 495.fl42 Mal 701 b1 CVMIOdW pareW6mn n.e:3ae eeMa hale. Rya�le a5,021 Ib.31] 21i,36) zt OM 25'.nQ3 39,075 2901 a,523 )a.m Rtm 1 M Om peyeEb BI>,1(12 1,9Moll 1103.<b ]11,950 1]5,703 2BG.350 1b,90) 1.Q3 B,C50 25006 8,"I,= prywyF 2G,0)1 2&.141 %,014 C5,]BS ]28.315 31].3b ]82,00O ],2Q,658 a01,00.1 w roan.omMF - - - a,we.ab ttmml ara�w®nems onwe. Gw.m ea6on 1s.1ss sum 49,7% e,as T150 ta,a62 1t,on 1,Bm a,+m 1m,5[8 2b,10 Getmnl e6s2ation eenmpeyoem, - ts.6co - ts,om tsbo c�m cnnAFGtiat oereola. ea.m Fenln 1xn Gas 3.4m.sb 0.01.333 5� Aa.be ]Ot,Bb bOAts 6.aW 2s.am 10.tb.It00 e,w,000 ougGuon+uamrer.�.e .eel*•»n�eamo,n+ _91.41Z�'1 TaLLlamxtlutiltief oare5m man msmaee e0a 6872ffi Sa05.495 ,0I.0.5@,3 59y„G6 1 LFS-951 _1165311 19.00 P7311 15=,9p 1187012 I"tam ruhww. Cmnpa�veteG Gtnenaa 253.m1 OW,bo ]et NO 92.101 t2O040 210.05 IV= MX2 01A14 2.55G.10 3..,. DeNn mnpaiWm M.- 504.147 t,b3,4to 1,Ott,3a1 220.02 261.b0 w"M ,w"" Sams ta5,a0T 5.970,510 S 4,21a cleans Wymaxe payeem. mwunmportpn 3],]01 112.2X t15,sso 13,1b t).)lo 31.05) 24,f02 3.052 2z0M 3n.1]] zst TYBEbmmmatdel WVa - - SO..RV,O[O Gwtel eSIVFSa�EaM1 pryeCM, mvnuG Fatim 0.5,o0D 45,0N W.0.tl CNlfulesol VaGklVltirtI YFYG01e. vgyngnl FUGim Mel Eirpmt b,i<],]At 1]3.100.153 t)0.310,Ib YJ.W9.mt 1),I50.25) a.05B.mB 25,300.Mt 312.S2 t.&b.475 aW.a0�5).pBm� a1T3]&93] TWI�]me&5es 5],6.]t,b0 135.ON96H II5.4ZL39@ 23.389819 17`,B3.3W 2e tu2=,. 2B.Q90.8L1 �' 1M32 916.M.390 a]e e)4.119 Tole)liNl. M512.Sb 1HS31.1 IM713.15m` 21.2a2 M 184MV9 31.OMM 27MM 4Mlal �].lnw 491.&B` 425 .M.M 411 F. fty: C wwopotl 5.55).m) 42,767,4b 2I,8m,O]0 12,M..M 5,157.535 15,051,052 12.2b,2o3 0,b2.113 01.147,Im 210,330.507 In"I"b0 patB emugt lem�mumeG Gxem3) 33.1537% 29216421 2615]6b5 1SZ55 31]66mo U878M 9L@9 OI 10 MI ffi4 72195.0L 40 Tp0ltwA ePmY 3ii]]Q.33ffi 235 z16 a2t 22p ass.]6a 5@ZS:Li@$ 36 PF^.e`= BI.9I9}HI isme.6lo 1B 1111]] 7].1@SSiB fl9L31B.@71 814411V19 TdtlbWNn W lvM eO�my Sj�MW; ])8M.YA M 172�09 B3<�805 553G��<33 12]943.0M B]5�`C00 10823618 ]SJ��BIB 120).mO3]8 1<21535 MB $N emxnpary<p mhpeMM euG:ltte'Wean. 33 COUNTY UMTAWN 0I MCT3 OF ORANGE MUM C—bhNS1 .q Rexwx,E.SW Clung.N R"tl E.6 I.W Year EnEee lure W.11195 WM Cmm3 .TBNNM 9re Y.E Ame W.18N pWtl Di OiWM Dix D'u Di dMM DbdM DN B�1 Nu2 tlID.3 Hai NG.9 Nt52 N9.11 H" Nwm .Im 1m G{amliN memwe: ServluginOx W.518498 ZI,BB;9B) 23,2R,BN 2.MI" 3,T24,191 Also.490 3,20],04] 0441907 MOOD M.'M..104 70,94),975 Vmm%qd Nepedpnfenam --ILIQL J.420 TADS MIS 4M NO m m FAA i4blwu4tinp aavimx 6,591501 2&M574 21MnD Z720W _3731 S4 6IM711 AMIN 8�907 4H.WO. 14. .= 71Ni B11 GFe�eOM egensx etlw Vren eepletletlen me emvl4Ylen: 9eluroeMEmxfAe 92B.201 1,113,85] 728,OM z28.534 3U72 WO,t9) M.268MOSS - 0SB0 9,MASS 4.WON NMy 9],972 4W 5 ]1.Sg1 82]z 81.2@ 110m - 66.W6 514.722 MA80 Bupgb fib W2 4z0,1W 85p32 X 1,10] ) 415 - 511,)23 28I,9B4 Cm ISIIrvrxc 247,530 1,IXRM 913.1D3 298.00) 138}#I 3 9,910 148,M5 7.105 YB),001 3,MASS 1,69;810 Diceue'leu 7,SSS 20.]M 15.925 10.491 B.BM 9,CA ],]M ),100 1;BM MASS t0;td )meleMOehi'vip iW 1.494 ;]W 481 tIz 518 223 004 571 B.BW 718 MBWeaM mehdmcn'e 2.938 15.494 BTA10 46,T30 98 181,018 4 IN N,4W M;WB 458]1B Jahe cpelalN9 eimew¢Oxelen,M 5,19B,W0 18,011,W8 19.4SIMI 1,) 3m 1,023,3M ,y599AW ;334w 151,ST! 1,219314 MWA488WASS 4$K11,NN G15e1 9615 �9.5� � ��� �,]13_ �2' � �$,31'1. �}71�. 183.059 Tauloeerelvg . enrer3ree e.Freemron am amowe5n 87Bz Pz l3,2gy522 15857424 395£354 2oz11S6. gWiVIR 4.m23i �ffi.ISL 12v29L m.2BTna oe®ghreie(weel hg4n eepecitlbn mgamaatrglm ]90.B2B 4514.K6 7.4M.W5 281.]3t t)t0,313 12%.49z (6B3,pa0t 898.740 (1.E83.007) 15,Z34.495 21.108,R4 Oegppelhnan vnhiSWNle bees - 75.073 - 75,0n 75,073 DepegNbnxe0sbtlNNa ;BM.188 10.01A552 9.7W.0)1 1,7nwo 1.M9.m ;917.403 ;098 2Wm ;177,O21 n$ 119 MM147 gmWyµngi gM1vxxN 14,049 40.862 47,491 0,185 ],W! t0.1N %W, 1,3B) 4.235 MASS 415.559 NnalFnllm q anex p4Uixe P� oweeek velxen eaTNeexM4 1iLZ09. OpeMhO Nmme G4n) am,]x IA549.1621 1z A4w 11491.4M 252.m 112992M1 aneBW1 MIRA (4W, 0J_8M2.0591 (12025,M4J (c4 W) Bxeea "NkdwM xe0alY nPq 34 r- r - c r- r- r- r-- r- c- r- F-- r _ r- c c- u-_ c_ r- [ L H [ t H [ H [ H l [ [ H H [ [ [ [ COUNTY 9RNITanoN DISITU OFORWIOE WUNW ComelnhgStalo ommRovonuoa,Evpen.es.ens Geryeeln RelWreC Eunbge(LvnllnuMl . WYaer EnE .M1o1s W.1W6 WM ComMm TOlebi MYm End8d nW.IM Dw4 DI. Omrla 0. olM oN4Y1 olS Obpp gNIW NR1 tln3 tl9.d m.5 G'9..9 tl9.1 w 11 t19.]9 tiv.]! ]tl5 199f NmclvrWlllpm v. I..t voe nue f1M.75a 5559.930 6,]B],82] 2105.812 %i,895 2M,430'mm 1,8)3,751 - - 2),285,028 B6,M.317 Inlaeel 1.]20.2M 5,658,)td 6,83Aet8 1.107.0110 Me.110 1,BSB,3]8 1,213.m? ]B2.030 551,330 18,ma,,MB 3],2m,31i FaEardvM slelepml menus 70,M W,HM QQlnms ],010 B,217 1 , 13,®i 3,O:W 5,0I9 173M - on.r _19.SR �.024 �E.005 —I39S �.912 �l,PA �.WL �92 18E.201 � 6401 Tolel m+operebpmvelxres 3227W _13.821 1597M 3 1857 4942649 3179710_ 2161m 40A63.n M.520.�p NmaperelFp e.perlew. In1vuR 2.60.1197 e,082,Bi4 7,392.72B 1A01.551 Ohm �TIB. � 80 1,377..3 . . ]], 0 1W,2]I 23,94 1 3.95]0< � � 2 tM7 1917 � 14389 e9.21 2.413E Tdel nma9erafuq 2695775, 135073 1.M613 1445 Z 1M993 1423529 imm _ItM I@9,sm 3976701 19.3II."uu9 fiwvme(lose)Belau edmamrwy bu on MhquWunaM dEebl (1.Sd.525) 1,0181090 5.082.897 080.799 1,tO5.YA 1,BB0.i72 (I.009ID2) ]38.35] (3,Sd5.818) 4,60.412 41.1ti1.170 Ea6eertmW be.meinbp�Nmmam daw N.t IINwne(bn) 11,604,5251 1.010.980 5.02.697 4W,7. 1".. 9 1,680.]]2 (I489.M) 736253 (2.515,818) 4W412 3],] .578 pW Eegetlelbn W emorbelbn Male0b¢nMBNeeepuny - - 75.E73 66770 7,2]S2 —7527@2 nel mwue(emeaael m mu mop eeM�palermnu8fee8drc3) (1,501,525) 1.OI6,B3J 5.002.097 dW,]BB 1105,698 1,I55,845 (1.489.282) 738.253 11,Be0.tIE) 5,]]6.104 ]8U3],358 Rmelm90amilpa(awmulabG MfrJll, bp5mbbayn.�,ea roaenea 10.957.2ed 191933� � 99395.797 32mt nta IS.1E5.952 90 tss nn ]0.99E.EII Q.11 625.7111 507 070Z02 gslahreCovm leca,muWleC eenCll. enedYear ]f_s1U,1y29 t ae�swa t�69egs as i_"sofi 31]oe.9M Ze 9z12ge 47,645,810 It�� a?_a easo cw.aeo314 fish seoewvm9ertrbaemo,nmem.wao�.roFOR 35 wuNtt3PW ArMd6T MUOMIWEDOUNry cm9Enm9BMemeMacan Fm Fm IM Year EMe]Ame 30,1935 WM CwnperelM Toleb M IM Yem EMef Lme 30.1 W i DuTtl D'¢V'rA �VId Dkhkt Dlchkl Db DW deVN! DbMN ft i N9.2 Ib d tlE4 NMA N, li MC 12 MLJA 19b 1f9 CM Ilor:s M1om(wE IM opnefoq eaNAm� NNwvn mewee(weelM eDmeSaN ffi63163EE1 fd4.ffiLffi41 1]0 ) I1 (]AII.ZLU 116.157 0251 10292.f@91 I339;.5661 m.ffiZ5517 f8.6W.113) l9m S/2 canIbee fi mn pW 5nm M en ans Proweeanom gffemY laB! 1,i0i,014 BAb.M &MA I RA7..910 97sm 2.l1%149 1.B25.ts1 - 2T.=920 35,W4.409 ceEweluN VIeM 9�vNmwnw 3Nro U. W.43+ ze+D 9AN lawn 1zW] zw s,009 2W.Wi - OmamnepxNNgmewet i0A92 W,628 ",A 2"E 4117 lum ],9]1 59] 1,WC$el 2,t IM 9,4W,t4] gwmnapNNmO matarmes (4s 2w1 ltW.b3) 13]II61 1182331 (1EL�'91 1569d41 I1S131 Q9.AEL P91.`SL f24199801 NN wN pwmetl by mm e9PeNMe9Gp rmlSae 1817317 6131.316 9SAAZt10 23W321 4I3 28]fl61] 1.161aW1 tl.W91 LI&S m Ifil 014 mmmi can 9we Rwn(wae MI'%Plml me nmee fireiempazuMme: PaSSwmpWeN'.PIar4®N qup 11,96].5T8) (9.299.658) (5153,HB1 (1R.DR6) (1.@8.953) (],239,59]) (4,115,918) 151B,9221 (5,295,TW) ('y478,174) (b,935,B36) INmeal pwlO,Naarmmua wglelcN 12.05I.WB1 (B,5@S72) (7,947.661) (1.09.799) (1,0R2.5T2) (1.422.]30) (tAW$W) (36.339) (1WA22) R5.436.]29) (2t,08,It8) PNMplpaymeaFw weYseM NPmlcgNw (1.t12W7) (3.20C,2I5) (2922.290) 1838.801 (258,853) (659.231) (515..000) 15,76% (N.WD) (9.W5, ) 151,9RSW0) Pmitlpel PeymeNew neMe (15,000) - - I15,M99D1 03.000) nwYmarawuntm erlwlwpar (L9Js,aW) I16.10,0001 I15155,(W) It.]2J.00M 12,5W,0001 13,Bb,9091 13.2W,Wo1 14W.OW1 (t,b5,0001 IW.Wo.000l - PmmMB mlm ewmiw a wnrwne H.49y298 peweEeM1an hawroalaWk wnunertivlPwar 64]34 9Mi]L 3451 L 12 Z83011 A PiwWhmn wP§Nwnm4aiam leans ]] . .331 1M1o.Wi 9W 3.&`�.786 69 62s.�e' R4 10381M1 ]I � xNawmwmeS lweq Sv nPSNeM rtSeMharcdA wNSiee tlD312 787 I27b2M1 137724.ffi31 f3AZ4I&01 (5,99Z.1131 l7].445.Z541 193121'!01 W32.1Mil ht].IIA (i5219.Y21 tl7GG1.9�1 CwM1Mnhem lmaWNeaMbe: oeaawlmxen151 hrveeMaNs t11451 ro 31,4R0,bf R,3i1,RW 1=4.517 6M..11s 0,0R3,1W 0,2 ,,535 92U,W0 B,mal 1M,W.276 (W,091,9W1 mWalww:ygl 1,0.51,i12 0,[W,W] 0.329,i10 l]24.S1T 932,E1 2,219,140 1,439,>W 0.4.0+0 358.40110,M.9ll 32,W1,42B maun Ieevuw)N wa0evan umm nrerw mPmameew�eelnnl 15 A29.1291 (347➢E43S1 0.2139551 19352.9231 I6.921.1831 0511.0511 (@49.90W I5.0815I51 L4L@13m 92.313.4ffi NelwNi e�miCeSM n»Nw NaMw 3,717W3 ]2wZ34 90W.W1 21nam ] 3310,W5 L1PB.5fR 332Z44 bzeW �4 92 13797 5H2 NN bneew lOeaeewlmwN+ d wTeWt+amh (11,W0,T.ml (m.205.02]1 (JT.940.U21) 11.5419,193) (4.+15,124) 121,]i6,5021 1+3,5W,0391 (5.Zf11.2W) (5n,112) (lYR.821,70) fd.WR.R50 can mie wnepurveleae.Ow'vmhpayeer M593. 23Z545ZF1 141M910 2T514451 3M3P765 659571 36653.M 2imm 39779W 472247,M 9lQ MS22 caNmM wA pvW¢MN,WNpn ID 25=28t+ 1B924 ]I =G01.1112 e1WM7 3349m 349491 Tz2� See emmmPmp'vm ndeparmbleWila3'npmt IDemweS) 36 f C- C- C C. u— C- u— C C L C-- C _ C- u _ u_ u- C- COUNTY SANITATION DISMM OF OMM E COUNTY D.WN 3 W ww b DeN Fbwe(DbeWwe) FnbeYw EMM Am 3D.1944 WMDempMNe TaI¢N Iw IM Yw ErtleE Ame 30,1 W4 Dmm DbenJ DWiq DW#m Db DW DNbIN Db DNbIf CW MnM1an apBlalMgwYMNe: Opl¢1'vp hvmBlbeel 51R.0]6,118) 19.549,1621 (R.3G.55]) 11,4s3,45a1 15R.B5D 11.]6B,RL61 R.T10,08]) a08.854 1<,5RR.65x) (1B.BSR,BBB) (13.B30,YM) AewhnmN b wwKa opnetlry MwmB IM.e1bDNo,nBnwN.4m R el Depetlelkn zB14.IW +D,0tIOW B,Tnm1 +.TSJ,DW 1,449.730 zB10.124 :,o see, xs1.6BB zm.w aaSW.1BB ax,BIG2m Ambebelbn u.Bae 4B,Bsz peel 5.1e5 zea] to.1z4 e.681 ue] eB1.ew eeesn tmaxee ONenpu Muxb WBeW.W: DweeeelWBFw)naonwN IavNeeb Ism.mal (1,]24,e4W) I1,492.790l RaTt5s1 I201.3121 I63I.9511 Rtl.axBl I54.0721 B;BBi 15.143,0451 les4,2se1 DsbewlMvwxl newmW glyr pbyyy 09,142 - 3e4.392 2.217,552 1.167,577 - M,9BI - - 0,919,250 (21.8]3) o.v...e(Moaewl new Mm anwreaemmeMel epeMJOe le.are.tl61 RB,ae4,ett) I2&eol.wal IS,eaz,e331 le.aaB.tB+I 111,sm,8481 R.148,3s11 Rsu.BaBl 11,2tl,em1 I92,7axtll (s.Jw,Bse) Oeveaeb(MveewlMe0w �emNeWe 390ee Bsaen wD,zm n 124,075 RBwe 1,i22 1.etl.582 3.213,3e9 930.831 DeoaeealvweewlM mwnabl (28.101) (1ex,500) R].490) (A.+zB) 19474 (tl,ae]) (50,212) IS,BxBI 152,737 1214,a]) (6BB.421) Deaeew lMneuelMpeWIE mb bnnrweeb Ifw.RBil R30,91]) R15.4M1 (41.517) pa2361 Iw.eeBl Oe.7961 DD.BMI OZOIxI IWWzesl I471.4521 Deaew lbwwlMewr .eeeu,mlM enwtlmlb� 17e004 2.4BB (30.B]e) (69,417) (91,614) (]18,e33) Ro9,es11 f1.91s 91.B4z 1913e4R1 lt.us.B.vl Imbbule.ouwl Memuu Orygl%F 72,338 T0,69J 173.606 ]F.311 9.5B1 117,905 OB.JDI B,BM (N8,913) BxB,iBl Itls,BID) Mneew(ecaaee)M emuea ePeBeee 090.65e1 IBW,1191 (698.466) 72.4J2 ROB.soel O1].1]1l a4.494 (a],aea) I26t,ei11 I2.66].s2e1 4,e96,ms I�cewleevewlM Wemiw gyebk (22,9]9) ( B Rw) .083) R.4B5) (1m,e3B) R35,WB) (1,np wall (B5].DBB) IIW,SBB) Imeaee(Eevewlln EeWtMe R1,61t) (03,420eN) $84,<'W W(M,eq) N,SxI (1,010,9t1) 912e94 RE,1911 653,atB 12]4i93) 2317.BN IveueleenuealMmreb oew pbbi le - R.o01,2331 - - - (2,868.70) (e,01) R39.Jm1 R.153.01191 (8.954.701) 210r! M eeeenlM bmpenpenuleE eMaioe (1]eRR) 1147,6R) (18R,017) (12e19) (35,336) (15,pSi) (JB,BN) R,6641 91,5I0) (5R,20.5) 290,BSB Mvaese(eev.evelMamme wewNelbn MYeNe aBxo (6B,87e) 4].363 11.683 (12.6J) 6.070 3a.481 1.Oxe 38.667 bzJ]B 1,27e,248 Inweaae(eeweeB)n W!me mglueemeMepmeEN 18,879 SR,BYS 48.270 0.071 6.330 1B,t53 12,873 1,tlB 3,9L0 18],xB3 (W2,433j Inwu leeF••eelMeetmw n 112M) J19.139I J3LI&@I 1172983) NeluMBnvkbby epWlwn 2BD . &51 2 M$V1,0201 11$M.,291 M.M.W91 fl.211,774f 1B1( . 5].825) el N2.1F1 (3,206,5561 31 .62i.651) tw AC� .11B1 19,00" su Bw,nwmMo MeepMeM a W 3w•nF60. 37 Li u u u u u (if03 PAPS LEFT IIiENT10W1LLY BLANK) u u u u u u u u u u u 38 u u Statistical Section Fiscal Year 1994-95 r r • r r r r R r C� • N • l O O W COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Expenses by Type (Dollars In Thousands) W Last Ten Fiscal Years W Operating(1) Non.Oneratina Fiscal Personal Malnt. Depr.& Total Interest Total Yee[ Services MA &Other Amort Oper. Exii Other Non-Ooer. W 1985-86 $11,506 $5,128 $9,881 $11,060 $37,576 $718 $922 $1,640 1986.87 12,935 5,418 12,845 11,140 42,338 9,592 1,308 10,900 W 1987-88 15,752 4,956 16,910 13,164 50,782 6,984 374 7,338 W 1988-89 15,735 5,580 19,810 14,988 56,113 3,631 494 4,025 1989.90 19,170 5.578 19,224 17,726 61,698 9,368 1,048 10,416 1990-91 24.170 5,483 20,711 23,520 73,884 9,654 1,822 11,476 1991-92 26.757 5.920 20.416 23.346 76,439 11.825 2.405 14.230 W 1992-93 28.924 7,235 21.677 27,950 85,786 11,799 1,250 13.049 W 1993-94 28,886 4,589 21.599 33,988 89,062 16,964 2,414 19.378 1994-95 29,399 3,180 22,719 34.087 89,385 23,941 826 24.767 W W (1)- The Individual cost components include a breakdown of the joint operating expenses,which, for 1993-94 and 1994-95,were as follows: W Fiscal Personal Maint. Depr. & Total Yee[ Services i)L &Other Amort. Goer. W 1993-94 24,715 4,042 18,870 - 47,627 W 1994-95 25,861 2,630 22.791 - 61,282 W Source: County Sanitation Districts'Accounting Division W 39 W L COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY L Revenues and Contributed Capital by Source (Dollars In Thousands) I Last Ten Fiscal Years L Coorounn Revenue Nonommtinn Revenue 99lltnh-Capm I Ponnit Foderal V Fiscal sve. Slnsp. Prop. Cap. a stato YM Chun Fens 4ib@I Taxes Rinhts Int. Gnats Other 1985-86 $1.019 $6.070 $830 $20,826 $20.251 $18,480 $118 $753 $(75) 1986-87 6,302 5.967 1.090 24,449 1.165 26,261 99 2,282 39,969 1987-88 9,418 6.299 1,349 27,368 1.009 24.823 1 648 1,786 1988-89 12,775 16,669 1,919 28,768 324 22.091 865 5,238 (733) 1L1 1989-90 23,009 1.241 - 31.122 1,242 18,993 2.070 1,887 94,132 1990-91 39,712 7.429 - 33.395 1,172 17,279 64 3.496 15,683 L 1991-92 56,155 322 - 34,053 1,815 22.593 2.053 5.499 12.898 1992-93 69.569 456 - 31,054 2,228 27,569 18 1.679 9.406 V 1993-94 70.908 540 - 35,854 - 33,226 - 6,450 13.471 L 1994-95 70,292 240 - 27,286 - 18,500 204 2.172 21,431 V L VI L L kd Source: County Sanitation Districts'Accounting Division L 40 L COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Property Tax Levies and Collections (Dollars In Thousands) Last Ten Fiscal Years %of %of Total Current Percent Dellnq. Total Total Tax Cry Delinq. Fiscal Tax Tax of levy Tax Tax Collect Delinq. Taxes to Yea[ LM Collect Collect collect Collect to.LM Tax" Tax Law m 1985A6 $23,585 $22.146 93,90% $782 $22.928 97.22% $ 806 3.43% 1986-f17 26.267 25,054 95.38 1.013 26,067 99,24 993 3.78 a' 1987-88 26.285 24.418 92.90 865 25,283 9619 1,649 6.27 1988-89 34,118 32.816 96.18 942 33,758 98.94 981 2.88 a 1989-90 47.900 45,024 94.00 729 45753 95,52 2.532 5.29 1990.91 72.180 68,841 95.37 845 69,686 96.54 2,n4 3.84 .e 1991-92 $5.172 79.329 93.14 1,637 80,966 95,05 5.057 5,95 1992-93 92,926 86.511 93.10 2.152 88,663 95,41 5,455 5,88 1993-94 92,728 88,335 95,26 5.722 94.057 101,43 3,255 3,51 1994-95 91.562 86,294 94,25 2.239 88.533 96.69 2,942 3,21 r Source: Orange County Auditor-Controllers Office. 41 IYd COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY L Assessed and Estimated Actual Value of Taxable Property (Dollars In Millions) 1 L Last Ten Fiscal Years i ' V Ratio of Secured Property Unsecured Property Totals Total kw Estimated Estimated Estimated Assessed Fiscal Assessed Actual Assessed Actual Assessed Actual to Est. Year Value Value Value Value Value Value Value L 1985-86 $64,263 $64,263 $2,620 $2,620 $66,883 $65,883 100% 1 1986-87 76,969 76,969 2,987 2,987 79,956 79,956 100 L 1987-88 83,897 83,897 3,290 3,290 87,187 87,187 100 r 1988-89 88,632 88,632 3,464 3,464 92,096 92,096 100 1989-90 98,750 98,750 4.422 4,422 103.172 103,172 100 1990-91 109,048 109,048 3,575 3,575 112,623 112,623 100 V 1991-92 116,450 116,450 4,473 4,473 120,923 120,923 100 1992-93 122,510 122,510 4,687 4,687 127,197 127,197 100 1993-94 124,016 124,016 3,953 3,963 127,979 127,979 100 r 1994-95 123,525 123,525 3,871 3,871 127,396 127,396 10O r Lf �.I I ' LI V Source: Orange County Auditor-Controllers Office. V� 42 i ' V COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Property Tar Rates-Direct and Overlapping Governments (per$100 of asessed value) Last Ten Fiscal Years Fiscal Year 199596 1986-87 1987-89 198M 1989-90 1990-91 1991.9;2 1992-9 1993"ea 1994-9 Basic 1%Levy 1.000D0 1.00000 1.00000 1.00030 1.00000 1.00000 1.00000 1.00000 1.00000 1.00000 Orange County No. 1 Bond l&R Fund-1951 0.00154 0,00199 0,00138 0.00121 0,00024 - - - - ea Orange Count'No.3 Bond I&R Fund-1951 - - 0.00521 0.00210 0 00039 - - - - - Orange County No.5 Bond I&R Fund-1951 0.00037 0.00047 0.00034 0.00031 0.00041 - - - Orargo County No.6 c' Bond l&R Fund-1951 O.00OBI 0.00044 - - - - - - Orange County No.11 ,.i Bond I&R Fund-1951 0.00023 0.00030 0.00019 0.00017 0.00008 - - - - Bond I&R Fund-1958 0,0097¢ 000140 0.09QZ@ 0.090,51 0,00021 0=15 0,00012 O M013 0.00018 404919 Total 1.00370 1.00460 1.00786 1.00430 IA0133 1,00015 1,00012 1.00013 1.00019 1.00019 Source:County of Orange Aud0or-Controller's Office. 43 I IV COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY L Principal Users For the Year Ended June 30, 1995 wi Percentage of Service Total Service Qg@[ Charges Cheri Revenues 1. Kimberly Clark $ 671,211 0.95% 2. Hunt-Wesson, Inc. 352,296 0.50 3. Shell Western E&P 251,638 0.36 4, Adohr Farms 249,273 0.35 5. Marine Corps Air Station 210,596 0.30 6. Pepsi-Cola Bottling 193,078 0.27 Lr 7. Sundor Brands 181,413 0.26 8. Coca-Cola Foods 161,056 0.23 V 9. Kraft Foods, USA 138,199 0.20 60 10.Anaheim Citrus 134,342 0.19 Total $2,543,102 3.62% L y v v V v Source: County Sanitation Districts'Accounting Division 44 m COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Ratio of Annual Debt Service for Bonded Debt to Total Expenses m (Dollars In Thousands) Last Ten Fiscal Years Total Ratio of Debt Operating Service to Expenses Total Fiscal Total Debt Exclusive of Operating e yam Principal Intense 3 Service Denr.B Amort. Expenses 1985-86 $1,581 $ 237 $1.818 - $26,516 6.86% 1986-87 1.607 9.592 11.199 31,198 35.90 m 1987-88 2,929 6,964 9,893 37,618 26.30 1988-89 3,002 3,531 6,533 41,126 15.89 1989-90 2,593 9,368 11,961 43,972 27.20 1990-91 2,396 9,654 12,050 50,363 23.93 m 1991-92 3,335 11,825 15,160 53.091 28.55 m 1992-93 6,075 11,799 17,874 54,096 33.04 1993-94 11,990 16,964 28,954 50,280 57.59 m 1994-95 9,670 25,439 35,109 55,298 63.49 m m m Source: County Sanitation Districts'Accounting Division m 45 m COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Computation of Chad and Overlapping Debt June 30,1995 1994-95 Assessed Valuation(Land B Improvements Only): $115,404,690,226(afer deducting$11,991,018,854 redevelopment tan L allocati0n InuamBM) DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING BONDED DEBT (Based on retlevelopment adjusted all property,assessed valuation of$120,219,905.825): i ' %Applicable Debt 61301 Yi Orange County 75.897% $ 447,792 Orange County General Fund Obligations 75.897 431,985,991 Orange County Pension Obligations 75.897 242,900,759 1 Orange County Transit Dlsbid Authority 75.897 16,014,267 V Orange County Flood Control District 75.875 830,831 Metropolitan Water District of Southern California 14A57 93,139,276 Coast Community College District Certificates of Participation 99.360 13,803.057 l Saddleback Community College District CertMples of Participation 3C334 9318248 V Brea-0linde Unified School District Certificates of Participation 97.894 35:491:470 Irvine Unified School District and Certificates of Participation 99.997 10,304,706 Santa Me Unified School District and Certificates of Participation too. 21,800,000 Orange Unified School District Certificates of Participation 95.970 12,178,693 Other School Districts and School Authorities Var0us 23,181.958 V City of Anaheim and General Fund Obligations 98.992 268,161,495 City M Brea General Fund Obligations 97.921 20,783.732 City of Costa Mesa and General Fund Obligations 100. 34,575,000 City of Huntington Beach General Fund Obligations 99.976 47.308.469 1r.1 City of Irvine and General Fund Obligations 100. 93.405,OD0 City of Le Habra General Fund Obligations 10D. 21,230,000 City of Sams Ana General Fund Obligations 100. 134.880,647 Other Cities and City Authorities Various 81,072,717 N Orange County Sanitation Districts and Certificates of PaNdpation 100. 418,435,000 Irvine Ranch Water District Certificates of Participation 98.773 59.263,800 Irvine Ranch Water District Improvement Districts Various 299,742,308 Orange County Water District Centimes of Participation 99.184 206,173,781 1 Municipal Water District of Orange County Water Facilities Corporation 73A95 64,774,818 1�1 Other Water Districts Various 20,986.610 Orange County Assessment Districts 100. 188,838,107 City of Irvine 1915 Ad Bonds 100. 238,259,225 City of Tustin 1915 Ad Bonds 100. 118,767,148 yj Other City 1915 Act Bonds Various 32,202,229 City of Anaheim Community Facilities Districts 100. 26,380,000 Irvine Unified School District Community Facilities District a86-1 99.995 34,453,277 Orange County Community Facilities District#674 97.483 74,847,713 L City of Placentia Community Facilities District 989-1 100. 24,820,000 Other Community Facilities Districts Various 78,863,580 Other Special Districts Various 10,523,333 TOTAL GROSS DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING BONDED DEBT $3.489944,937 (1) i Less: Orange County Transit Dlsmct Authority(80%sett-suppoNng) 12:511,414 �sl Orange County Water District Certificates of Participation(100%self-supporting) 205.173.781 City of Mahelm selfaupporting obligations 200,750,319 MWDOC Water Fedl0lea Corporation(100%self-suppoNng) 64,774,818 1 Other selfauppomng obligations 5,534,261 V TOTAL NET DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING BONDED DEBT $2,999,900,334 (1) Excludes tax and revenue antidpation notes,revenue,mortgage revenue and tan allocation bonds and non-bonded capital lease obligations. , Ratios to Assessed Valuation: Land B Improvements NI Property I4'. Direct Debt ($418,435,000) 0.36% 0.35% Total Gross Debt 3.02% 2.90% Total Net Debt 2.60% 2.60% I STATE : $36,462,122 y L L Source: California Municipal Statisfices 46 L r ,r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Bond Coverage (Dollars In Thousands) °tl Last Ten Fiscal Years Direct Operating Net Revenue Debt Service Reauirements Fiscal Gross Expenses Avail.For Coverage Ykar Revenuell) (2) Debt Service Principal Intere S I4tel 1 1985-88 $77,348 $26,516 $50,832 $1,581 $ 237 $ 1.818 27.98 1986-87 67,614 31,198 36.416 1,607 9,592 11,199 3.25 r 1987-88 70,916 37,618 33,298 2,929 6,964 9,893 3.37 1988-89 88.649 41,125 47,524 3,002 3,531 6,533 7.27 1989-90 79,563 43,972 $5,591 2,593 91368 11.961 2.98 1990-91 102,548 50,363 52,185 2,396 9,654 12,050 4.33 r 1991-92 122,489 53,091 69,398 3,335 11.825 15,160 4.58 r 1992.93 132,573 54,096 78,477 6,075 11.799 17,874 4.39 1993-94 146,979 50,280 96,699 11,990 16,964 28.954 3.34 m 1994-95 118,695 55,298 63,397 9,670 25,439 35,109 1.81 r (1} Including non-operating revenues. (2)-Exclusive of Depreciation and amortization. (3)-Coverage requirements per the Districts'certificate of participation Indenture agreements range from 1.0 to 1.25. Although the coverage rate has fallen over the last four years, it is the Districts policy to be in compliance with all bond convenants and the Districts have the ability to raise user fees by a vote of the Board of Directors. ee r r Source: County Sanitation Districts'Accounting Division r 47 III COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY L+ Demograhic Statistics Covering The Entire County of Orange(1) Last Ten Fiscal Years (2) (3) (4) Population Median (2) Public School (6) Fiscal Estimates Family Median Enrollment Unemployment YsaT (in Thousands) Income Aga (In Thousands) RIlls r 1985-86 2,151 $41,537 31.5 337 4.0% 1986-87 2,195 43,264 32.0 338 3.3% 1987-88 2.239 45,176 32.4 345 3.0% V 1988-89 2.280 49,916 32.8 354 3.1% 1989-90 2,326 53,000 33.2 368 2.9% 1990-91 2,411 56,380 30.4 385 4.8% 1991-92 2.512 56.346 30.4 393 4.8% v 1992-93 2,557 54,380 30.4 400 6.7% 1993-94 2,597 54.413 32.6 402 5.8% 1994-95 2,641 55,607 32.9 412 5.5% r r r r Y�I Notes and Data Sources: ,r (1)- The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County services 470 square miles,or 59%out of the total 799 square miles that make up the boundries of the County of Orange. (2)- Data Source-Demographic Research Unit, California Department of Finance. r (3)- Data Source-"The Chapman College Economic&Business Review'(estimates). (4)- Data Source-Orange County Department of Education. (5)- Data Source-Orange County Employment Department ..I u 48 r ,., COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Property Value, Construction and Bank Deposits Covering The Entire County of Orange(1) s, (Dollars In Thousands) Last Ten Fiscal Years Non. se Assessed Reslden0al Residen0al Property Value(21 Constr.(31 Construe6on(31 Total Bank re Fiscal Calendar No.of ConBtr. Deposits lfeB[ Value Ysar Y-Blue Slnk )CaluC Xa1NCl$1 18d1 ,.d 1985-86 $D4,298,962 1986 $1,483,240 23,676 $1,795,095 $3.278.335 $14,468,671 1986-87 103,944,930 1987 1.491,420 23.062 1,788,598 3,280,018 16,167,780 1987-88 113,888,095 1988 1.324.186 20.522 1.779,847 3,104,033 18,OD3,603 1988-89 125.682,613 1989 1.707.485 24.056 2.279.515 3,987,000 19.853.278 m 1989-90 141,941.723 1990 1,472.070 14,849 1.897,324 3,369,394 18,665,165 1990-91 158,342.197 1991 963,972 8,193 1,041,641 2,DD5,613 19,687,437 1991-92 170,151,136 1992 704,135 7,698 1,297.452 2,D01,587 27,223.764 1992-93 178.534,134 1993 520,214 6.122 1,053.565 1,583.779 22,637,820 1993-94 178,761,413 1994 523.480 7,333 1,338.519 1.861.999 24.925,640 1994-95 176,974.944 1995 622.189 11.726 1,676.135 2.198.325 24,979,857 r Data Sources: r (1)- The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County services 470 square miles, or 59%out of the total 799 square miles that make up the boundaries of the County of Orange. (2)- Orange County Aud'dor-Controller. (3)- 'The Chapman College Economic&Business Review'. All amounts shown for 1994 are forecasted. (4)- The Bank Deposit amounts represent an annual average balance on deposit as of the last day of each quarter. m 49 L COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY �r Estimated Populations of Cities and Unincorporated Areas Served by the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County June 30, 1995 V �C Population Population Anaheim 296,497 Los Alamitos 12,425 `, Brea 35,122 Newport Beach 70,098 Buena Park 73,864 Orange 120,078 Costa Mesa 103,823 Placentia 45,339 Cypress 46,963 Santa Ana 311,491 Fountain Valley 55,171 Seal Beach 26,795 Fullerton 123.692 Stanton 32,404 L Garden Grove 153,824 Tustin 62,497 Huntington Beach 189,795 Villa Park 6,445 Irvine 123.909 Westminister 83,287 V La Habra 54,907 Yorba Linda 58,069 La Palma 15,781 Ir 23 Cities Subtotal 2.102,276 Unincorporated 173,437 Total 2,275,713 V V u Ir L.f V Source: Demographic Research Unit,California Department of Finance. Li 50 u COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Insurance in Force As of June 30, 1995 LM Insure Deductible Limit d All-Risk Property Ten Carriers Fire and Flood $25.000 $200 Mil. per Occurrence Earthquake Greater of 5% per $30 Mil. per Occurrence unit or$250,000 Boiler& Machinery Kemper/National Ins. Co. Mutual Casualty Co. $25,000 to $100 Million $100,000 Employee Dishonesty/ Faithful Performance Hartford Insurance Group $5,000 $2 Million Errors&Omissions See Employee Dishonesty/ Faithful Performance General Liability Self Insured .,, ($3.4 Million Reserve) Master Course of Construction Encon/Zurich 5%Values $45 Million at Risk per Occur./ Location Travel &Accident Heritage Life -0- $400,000 Insurance Co. Each Accident Workers' Self Insured Compensation ($0.76 Million Reserve) Excess Workers' Compensation National Union Fire $250,000 Statutory Limit Insurance Co. Each Accident .n Source: County Sanitation Districts' Risk Management Program 51 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Comparison of The Volume of Wastewater Treated With Expenses by Type (Dollars in Thousands) Last Ten Fiscal Years Millions of _ Gallons of Wastewater Treated Fiscal Per Personal Maint Dep,B Total Interest Total Total Year 2a Services 01 &Other Amon. 9-M Expense Other Non-Oder. Expenses 19B5-86 $11,506 $5,128 $9.881 $11.060 $37.575 $718 $922 $1,640 $39.215 1986-87 12.935 5,418 12.945 11,140 42.338 9,592 1,308 10.900 53.238 1987-88 15,752 4,956 16.910 13.164 50,782 6,964 374 7,338 58,121 - 1988-89 15,735 6.580 19.810 14,998 56,113 3.531 494 4,025 60,139 1989-90 19,170 5,578 19,224 17.725 61,698 9,368 1,048 10.416 72,114 1990.91 24.170 5.483 20.711 23.520 73,894 9,65,1 1,822 11.476 85,360 1991-92 26,757 5.920 20.416 23,346 76,439 11,825 2,405 14,230 90,669 1992-93 28,924 7,235 21,677 27.950 85,786 11,799 1,250 13,049 98,835 1993-94 28,886 4.589 21,599 33,988 89,062 16,964 2,414 19,378 108,440 1994-95 29,399 3,1 so 22.719 34.087 89,305 23,941 826 24,767 114,152 In 1989.the Districts completed a 30 year master plan which projected wastewater treatment flows to increase from 275 millions of gallons Per day(mgd)in 1990 to 300 mild in 1995 and out to 400 mild in the year 2020. In order to manage the increase in wastewater flows,the Districts Initiated a S1.5 billion 30 year capital expansion plan with projected debt financing costs of$1.2 billion and future operating and maintenance costs,excluding depreciation,of - $62 million annually. As depicted from the chart above,actual wastewater treatment flows increased from 241 mgd in 1985-86 to a high of 269 mgd in 1990-91. Flows suddenly dropped to a ten year low of 227 mgd in 1991-92 and have since ratcheted themselves be&up to 243 mgd in 1994-95, The sudden drop in 1991-92 influent is attributable to a combination of factors including' -the state-wide recession which not only reduced new development in Orange County,but caused a migration of existing commercial and industrial facilities and reductions in hotel occupancies. -the So.California water drought which lead to conservation measures and changes in water usage habits. Total expenses have increased S42 million,or 58.3 percent since 1989-90 primarily as a result of the expected increases in wastewater flows. Of this increase,depreciation expense represented 22.7 percent and debt service interest represented another 20.2 percent as a result of the capital facilities expansion Nat has been completed. The Disidcts are currently performing a master plan update to ensure that future plant capacity will match more closely the future needs of the residents of Orange County. Source: County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. 52 ,., COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Biosolids Produced m Last Ten Fiscal Years .. Fiscal Year Tonnaae m 1985-86 24,623 1986-87 29,519 1987-88 32,939 1988-89 45,164 1989-90 48,439 m 1990-91 44,968 1991-92 43,464 1992-93 41,964 m 1993-94 39,650 r 1994-95 40,228 d Ytl Source: County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. r 53 d COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Miscellaneous Statistics June 30, 1995 W District Organisation: g Districts servicing 23 cities,unincorporated areas and bur spacial districts as Wipes: Disaid No. 1 Disldct Ne.3 District No,7 L Cities: Chas: Cities: Orange Anaheim Irvine Santa Ana Brea Orange Tustin Buena Park Santa Ana LI Special Districts: Cypress Tustin Costa Mesa Sanitary Fountain Valley Special Districts; District Fullerton Costa Mesa Sanitary Huntington Beach District L La Habra La Palma Los Alamitos District No. 11 j Santa Ana City of Huntington Beach LI Seal Beach Stanton District No Special Districts: Distdct No. 13 Cities: Garden Grove Sanitary Cities: yr Anaheim District Brea Brea Mitlway City Sanitary Orange Fountain Valley District Yoba Linda Fullerton rr La Habra District No.5 Orange City of Newport Beach District No.14 Plawn is Cities: Santa Ana District No,6 Irvine v Vila Park Cities: Orange Yorba Linda Newport Beach Tustin Special Districts: Special Districts: Special Districts: I Garden Grove Costa Mesa Sanitary Irvine Rench Water Lis Sanitary District District District Governing Body: 30 member Board of Directors Stag: 552 fulFOme and 14 pan-time employees u Operstional Date: July 1,1954 Authority: Calibrate Health 8 Safety Code Section 4700 at.seq. Services: Wastewater collection,treatment,and disposal. I Service Area: 470 square miles y Population Served: 2.275,713 Operations: Total mines of from,and subtmnk sewers-825 miles Number of pumping stations-26 Average Daily Flow-Plant No. 1 74 MGD(1) I Average Daily Flow L-Plant No.2 164 MGD(1) Total --779mw(1) (1)- In millions of gallons per day. Source: County Sanitation Districts'Accounfing Division. L L 54 L JOINT CHAIRMAN'S REPORT JOINT BOARD MEETING OF NOVEMBER 15, 1995 1 . I'm saddened to report the death of the Districts' Purchasing Manager, Ted Hoffman. Ted died last Saturday, November 11 , of a massive heart attack while playing Over- the-Line Softball in Vista. Ted was a 19-year employee of the Districts. He will be missed by everyone. We will be adjourning the meeting in his memory. 2. The item on the agenda regarding changing the meeting dates for November and December are for next year, 1996. The changes to this year's calendar were approved last March. 3. The working committees are not meeting in December. However, there will be an Ad Hoc Committee meeting re Landfill Issues on December 13 at 4 p.m. and a Steering Committee Meeting at 5:30 that same day, before the Joint Boards meeting. 'MEETINZIDATE: 11/15/95 TIME: 7:30 P.M. DISTRICTS: 1.2.3.5.6.7.11.13 & 14 DISTRICT 1 JOINT BOARDS IMORENO) ........... MC OUIOAN ........ (BOWMAN) ........... AGE . . ...... .. ... fj� (PERRVI ... ......... FERRYMAN ...... IHASTINOSI........... BROWN . . ..... .... (COONTZ) ........... MURPHY ......... (SCOTT ... COLLINSIPOTTS) ............ SALTARELU ....... . be IDEBAYI ............. COX .... (STEMERI ........... 2,14 • ......... .. (COX) ............... DAY . . ... u ES IBELL1 ............... DENES .... IBAUER) .......... DEMOFF ......... DISTRICT 2 IPARKERI ............ WNLAP ........., ISCOTT ............ FLORINS ...... IDOWNEYI............ ECKENRODE ....... ILULLU(SOR1 ......... WELCH ........... ILYRRY) ............. FERRYMAN —_ (SELL) . ............. DENES ............ IANDERSOM .......... FLORA ......... IPARKERI ........... BURLAP........... WARSHAW ORIFFW ........... J[ _ IOOWNEYI .......... ECXENROOE ........ IWELCH) ............. iYW%GWL........ (ANDERSON) ......... FLORA ...........I Jl� NAM) ............. HAMMOND ........ IMORENW ........... MCOUIOAN ........ J[_ ISAUER) ............. LEIPZIG ........... (COONTZI ....... MURPHY .......... gkG MUNCH) ............. UNN ............. .. MOREY I ............ S ........... IMORENO) ............ MC O ........ RILAKET.... SINGER ........... .4 IOUONTZI ............ MURPY .......... j ISTEINER [ — ........... ......... IDUNIAPI FIRE............. IDAIYI ............. ZEMEL ........... JOC SONI........... ......MORB U ....... DISTRICTS (POTTS) ............. SALT4MUU........ DOTSONI ... SAFEN ........... MOTSONI ............ SAPEN .....IPARKERI ........... ........... (ZLAKET) SWOA ..... DUN BARMAN) .......... AGE ............. . . ............ _✓ % (SANTON............ .SUMER .......... (HASTT) ............ BROWN .........:: (STLLERI . ........... SWAN . .......... ISCOTT) ............ FLORINS ........ (MI ............. SWAN . . .......... (MNOSRSOM ......... FLORA ............ MULMIWAHU-STROMI ........ SYLVIACH ........... IMARSNALU ......... BRIFFlN .........:: IOULLULSONI .......... WELCH _ IBAUERI LEIPZIB ......... MALY) .............. ZEMEL ......... IMMERI ............ LINN ............. . — (MOREN01........... MCWKi4N .. IEPPERSONI.......... RICE ............. STAFF E11S (MORSY) ............ SA ............ ANDERSON . ✓ WOODRUFF 6lAKET............ SWOER ,.......... HASENSTAB ANDRUS .... (STERNER) .......... AlYi51►......... HODOES ... ✓ WNUH...... MAHLSTMMJ ....... BYLVR ........... Hov . ... �/ mow ..... _W IDALYI TH.EL ............ . JONK ..... L LEE........ _C ....••.•••••• XYIE ..... ✓ LINDSTROM.. DISTRICTS UNDER .... y NIXON...... (COX) .............. 00AY............ . LUDWW &RAW...... ISTANTON) .......... ffTEwm........... . MCINTYRE.. �� STONE ..... .. IDEBAYI ........,.,. COX ............. . DOWN . .. .......... OATEN . ... ... ....... DISTRICT S STREED ... _C .......... _ IPERRYI ............ FERRYMAN......... . WHEATLEY . JG .......... ICOXI .............. DEBAY............ WILSON ... .......... (STANTONI .......... 81EWER........... —_ IPUR ............ W WSo n ••• DISTRICT // iA u�4.�1u WAR01 . ........... D......... POTTS) ............ ULTARE.. ........ICOXI DEBAY............ FERYMAN......... PAU (MOENI ........... MCQUIGAN ........ �F � COONUI ........... MUR. ..... 4, 0�` W./I ISTANTONI , .......... BTEWER........... =ER) ............ LEIPllO . ....... VCR+r�-`Tn �ipO,.✓ IBAUERI . ........... DETTLOR ......... / �T/ ISTEINER) ........... ......... DISTRICT 1J 'O'"T ✓ , IWELCRI .............BIMLSIBBR IDALYI ............. ZEMEL ............ ICOONTD ........... MURPHY .......... .9kke — :DUNLAR ... ........ PARKER ........... ..JJV — STANTON) .. ... ..... STERNER........... — DISTRICT 14 IPOTTS) . . . ...... . . . SALTARELU . ....... ✓ ICOONTZI .. .... ... . . MURPHY .... . . .... �[ MARDI . ....... . ... HAMMOND. . . .... . . ISTANTONI . ..... . . . . SUMER. .. . .. . . . . . J� JAWPDOMBSWIRECTORM102. IMILLERI . . ..... . . ... SWAN . . . . . ... .. .. . 09127195 REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE B ARDMEET�. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION AND REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES. DATE: 11 ` 1 S- R 5 AGENDA ITEM NO. IR NAME: (PLEASE PRINT) ��� HOME ADDRESS: 3B0a A�� ST7�el� NUMBER STREET 'AY/ZIP DE 7? `{ CITY ZIP CO(DEE TELEPHONE: 714- 552 - 77'�79L pp REPRESENTING: /, 4, '' (YGtrden lTrd»1P. SELF R NAME OF R ANIZATION F28A REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION AND REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES. DATE: /vcu � � AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (PLEASE PRINT) e HOME ADDRESS: 3UlD c-clGi� NUMBER TREET (CITY/ZIP ODE TELEPHONE: `C7 & - 2�Z-LZz REPRESENTING: G�Q:�gxJ�� CBUAJt=y b'� 1«vc.s3 �auA,tAL SELF OR NAME F ORGANIZATION F28A 11/15/95 -JOINT BOARD MINUTES #6 (a) - Report of Joint Chair The report I have tonight is very brief, but unfortunately not pleasant. This past weekend we had a death of one of the Districts' staff, The District Purchasing Manager, Ted Hoffman. Many of you may have known him; he died on Saturday November 11 of a massive heart attack while playing over-the-line softball here in Vista. He was a 19 year employee of the District and will be missed by everybody. He was a tremendous individual from what I'm told. I did not know him personally, but it was a shock because it just came out of the blue. He literally picked up a ball and threw it to home plate or something like that and fell over, not to recover; and no warning what-so-ever, so it's quite a sad event. I think he was 57 years old. So makes us all stop and think, since we are in that ball yard, so to speak. But anyway, tonight we want adjourn the meeting in his memory, so we should note that. For your information, the working committees as we have discussed before will not be meeting in December. However, the ad-hoc committee on land-fill issues will meet on December 13 at 4:00 p.m. We met tonight earlier and will be reporting later in the agenda about that discussion. The steering committee will meet at 5:30 on the 13th and then the Joint Board will have a meeting on the 13th at the regular time at 7:30 p.m. This is the second week of the month due to the holidays, so note this is a change on your calendar. #15 All Districts We should have a comment on this item because this has to do with the County of Orange Operational Area Agreement and it is starting to point to a development plan to coordinate, communicate, respond and recover from major emergencies and disasters. Dan Tunnicliff representing the Safety and Emergency and Response Division will briefly describe this Operational Area Agreement and its importance to the Districts. This item has not been presented to any committee so I think it would be valuable just for us to have a quick briefing on it. Dan Tunnicliff Couldn't hear a word. Dan Orange County's Operational Area is 180 separate different loops which all have a say in the development of this agreement. The primary focus of the Operational Area Agreement is ..... will provide single source for the county ........ Questions or comments .... Pat .......... Did everyone hear the question as to the location selected for J:IWPD0Cl3SW1lN95W0TES.1 i Page 1 v the Operational Area Emergency Operation Center? The County places the County Emergency Operation Center in Silverado Canyon because it is on a peak which allows complete communication. It's where the County has located its Control One, which is the emergency communication network - all of the radio systems are through that facility so we believe it's strategically placed out of the flood plain, hopefully out of the liquid faction area and in an area where communication cannot be disrupted. Question — Couldn't hear. Answer (Female) The EOC is located off of Jamboree and Chapman in Silverado. It also has a heliport that we have access to and I invite anyone who would like to come up and take a tour. Question —(From whom?) Cooperating with the County in response to an emergency -will our cooperation with the County in anyway prevent District Staff from doing what they would otherwise do in case of an emergency? Answer- Would not- and in case of a major emergency we are all going to need to mutually help each other to the fullest extent that the communication systems, and so forth allow. For Discussion: It will be an 800 Megahertz System ............ etc. (Jim) Couldn't hear. #16 Verbal Report of General Counsel These are ordinances having to do with an early retirement incentive program. This item has been through all committees. Are there any questions, discussions or desire of a staff comment? Tom, I think. The nature of this ordinance is a little bit different. The first item on your agenda, as you know, is to have a roll-call vole by district and that authorizes District No. 1 to adopt the ordinance. That is in lieu of having all 9 districts adopting their ordinances. Because of the nature of this, where we have a contractual agreement with the County, we just really want the one ordinance. So everybody will have to approve it by your districts under Item 16 (b), but that authorizes District 1, which under the joint agent for all of the districts to in fact adopt the ordinance. #17 All Districts This has to do with the landfill we have been discussing for some time. As I mentioned the Landfill Committee met earlier tonight to discuss the progress that has taken place between the County and the County's Integrated Waste Management Agency and the Districts' staff. I would like to recognize Vicki Wilson. She runs the agency for the J:\WPDOC\BS\lVlN95WOTES.11 Page 2 - c County and has been dealing with our staff for several months now-trying to work out a lot of the issues that are associated with this purchase if we are to go forward with it. The discussions centered around a letter that is being developed between the Orange County Sanitation District Staff and the County of Orange and the issue has to do with timing. I think, and some of you have heard in prior committee meetings, where Don has reported that the County would like us to move up the time-table from what we had originally thought about doing. As you may recall, we looked at a nine-month due- diligence period and the County would like it to be less than six months if we can get there and they also wanted us to be able to deal with settling on a price and a term sheet within the next sixty days. When we reviewed it at the committee tonight, we concluded that sixty days was really just too fast for us to deal with a term sheet. A couple of reasons: Obviously, the Holidays is one, but another one is the County has engaged Ernest and Young, as John Collins points out, we pay for them, but they've engaged Ernest and Young to do an evaluation of the County Landfill asset, if you will, and I think it is a reasonable due- diligence on their part. But what it also leads to is to how that effects the terms of the Agreement once they gel put together. It is our understanding that the Ernest and Young report will not be available for about 45 days, therefore, we would only have 15 days even to review it and make a decision at this board level. Many of us thought that was not sufficient time. 30 days is fast track as it is. So our recommendation is that it would remain as a 75 day period from the time that the County is intending to take action, which is next Tuesday, November the 21 st, and that would allow this report to be prepared and for us to get the information and over the 75 day period of time to begin to get into the deal points, if you will, associated with the landfill and then be able to come up with a price and a term-sheet by our January 27th Board Meeting. We would undoubtably do it before, but at least the board would have an opportunity to make a call at that point in time. The rest of the deal remains virtually the same in the sense that we would, over the six month period of time, continue the due-diligence relative to the site that we have started already. One other point just to give you a heads-up; if we chose to move ahead and agreed on the price and the terms at the January 27th meeting, in those terms would be a request for a deposit of something between one million and three million dollars, which is not unreasonable in any kind of purchase program you go through. That amount of money would be refundable in case some catastrophic issue arose afterwards. But the $100,000 that we already approved to initiate this process is non-refundable and it remains non-refundable through our negotiation process that we doing over the next 75 days. So in summary, that's what we discussed, that's where we see ourselves going. The Committee recommended the staff finalize the letter to the county dealing with the 75 days even though Vicki was uncomfortable with that, desiring 60 days. At least we think that they can bend a little and give us a chance to have it go through the proper process. Jan - I would just request that Blake share the information that he has been given in that the County is looking to alternatives to landfills. They're talking about a mandate now that makes it essential that every county have a 15 year capacity. They are opening old landfills and sorting though them and sanding them. Ours may not be that J:\WPD0C\B8\MIN95W OTES.11 Page 3 attractive. If they open up for 15 years they may not find our offer so attractive. Also 50% recycling has to be in place by 2001. So the fact is that with recycling, landfills again, are going sometimes. This will be addressed by the County. It is a very dynamic industry and that's what makes it so complicated to come to a conclusion about value, and what future revenues are going to be. Ecology may change how we treat refuge. If there is not demand for landfills, we sure don't want to be setting here with one. #18 All Districts Investment Pool: No action .... #19 All Districts This item has to do with the Excess Capacity Charges issue that we have been (� wrestling with for several months now. For your information, I do have two people here that would like to speak to us, Mike Newman from the Orange County Business Council and Mark Esteress from the City of Garden Grove. I withhold these until we go through a staff report because staff does have a report on this and would like a recommendation. Mr. Chairman, as you all know from the board letter and other communications we have had, excess capacity charges that became effective July 1st, which was an attempt to more rationalize the process of evaluating as to how we arrive at what capacity charge is meant to be has met with considerable apposition and concern by the Business Council, by the Legislature, by City Councils that have major industries coming forward who are objecting to, or are concerned about the amount of the excessive capacity charge. Blake, Nancy and I have had a variety of meetings with members of this board, with the Business Council, with the so-called "Red Team" and the County who is concerned about the adverse impact this may have on business. As a consequence of a meeting last Thursday, where we had John Collins and we had Sheldon Singer and Roger Stanton, they concluded that we should, as much as we can as an agency, be sensitive to the needs and concerns that have been expressed and the thought they had was, "Let's consider rescinding the ordinance". Stepping back to where we were prior to July 1 and which would have some impact on the fee, but not a lot, and invite the Business Council in to work with us as we develop a new charge, based in part on the new financial studies that we are going to be making in connection to the strategic plan. And that directive of your agenda that reports now about how to implement it; I would stop there, Mr. Chairman, and perhaps John and/or Sheldon or Margie or Tom (we had five members at that meeting) on Monday with the Business Council and I think that they concluded that it was the better part of valor to reconsider our ordinance and step back to where we were before and open up our analysis to the business community to work with us as we go forward. So those of you that were at that meeting may want to say something. Any comments? J:\W PDOC\BSVv IN95W OTES.11 Page 4 The other two directors that were present at the meeting were Mr.Lenne1 and Mr. Murphy. It's the recommendation of this body to rescind the ordinance. Our action would be to do that by individual district. We have to go through that. Is there any discussion or question about that recommendation? Go ahead John, since you were there at the meeting. Couldn't hear him. Dick: Two concerns. One is that in the interim we would be dealing individual business applications on a case-by-case basis. Answer: That has been our historical practice. Dick: Second question is how long will it be before we develop a new system since reviewing on a case-by-case basis is a sorry way to do business. Answer: I think it will be at least 12 months, or maybe longer. That is the time-line for our finance study. And there is no use, I think, redoing the ordinance until we have a better handle on our capacity requirements, which in turn dictates how much capital plant needs we're going to have. We are not going to have that study completed in less that 12 months. We will fall back on the ordinance that was in place many years before this one. '04emale: In response to the issue as to what we will do in the interim beyond just doing a case-by-case analysis, we will return to the previous practice which was to look at flow and we also do have data from the existing ordinance looking at solids and other things, so we will not be doing it without some standards. We will be using the previous practices that the districts have had. Couldn't hear conversations. Let me make one comment that has nothing to do with change and that is that we did not do a good job of informing the cities about this new ordinance. At that very same time they were courting major new developments to come into their city from companies abroad and from local companies. I think, frankly, that we did not anticipate these made numbers of major developers, that Sheldon calls few in number, and they are, but you probably expect to have one of those in a decade, not five at a time. So our timing was not really good in that respect. And finally, I guess I'd say, that with the strategic plans starting virtually as we speak, now's the time we could reassess our capacity requirements and I think in the ordinance that we just adopted in July we were relying on the 20/20 plan, which you know have some numbers in it that are quite dated now because of the close simply have not lived up to the expectations that we had outlined in that report. J:\WPDOMBSUIN95\NOTES.11 Pape 5 L John: Couldn't hear many conversations. Any other questions/comments? We do have the request to speak on this, which you are certainly welcome, I think the action we are going to take is to rescind, it sounds like -so if that's good enough - O.K. Let's start moving through the process here. We need to take this district by district. Is that right Tom? Tom: That is correct. And on the Agenda listing there is one item that is not included and the items that you will be considering will be a motion relative to the Ceqa Exemption as required. The motion will be to make a final adoption of the ordinance. This, in fact, is statutory exempt under the California EnvironmentalM. Therefore it is statutory exempt. So we can move the recommended action as motion? (Couldn't hear Tom's answer) #19 (i)All Districts The ordinance will not have to reenact#1409. There is a section in the ordinance that will repeal this one and yield to the ordinance that was enacted in July. #21 Supplemental Agenda -All Districts Tom: A summons complaint was received by the districts last Thursday and the Board Secretary published it as a supplemental agenda item. This, as I've noted in the memo, is an action to collect on the Stop Notice. The districts' are not interested. We are basically the stake holder and the winner between the contractor and sub- contractor will get the money from us as directed by the court. We are entitled to recover all of our attorney fees and legal costs and we will probably get a "Stand-Aside" from both attorneys so we don't have to participate. Anyway, if that does not come about we will have to appear and represent the district. 0.K, any questions/discussion? A motion of approval. JAWPDOCI6SUNIN95\NOTES.11 Page 6 a COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1 , 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 , 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES JOINT BOARD MEETING NOVEMBER 15, 1995 RICTS 0F09gG hQ 0 c > y � a CJ �y ti ��TFOI'NOL`'�THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3. 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on November 15, 1995,at 7:30 p.m., in the s Districts'Administrative Offices. Following the Pill of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Dis icta Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. 7, 11, and 14 as follows: ACTNE ALTEIWATE DIRECTORS DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO. 1: _J_ Per McGuigan. Clair Ted R.Marine James M.Ferryman,Chair pro tem Arthur Perry * Mark A.Murphy Jeanne Coon¢ * Thomas R.Samerali Jim Potts Roper Stamon William G.Stainer DISTRICT W.2.• John Collins.Chair George Seen X DarcM T.Welch.Clair pro arm John M.Gullixsan Barry Deros Bob Bell Burnie Dunlap Glenn Parker y_ Norman Z.Sckanrode Carol Downey 4_ James H. Flora Steve Anderson • Pat McGuigan Ted R.Moreno J_ Mark A. Murphy Joanne Co0me _• Julie SO Chris Norby • Sheldon Sugar George L.Makes _ Roger Stanton _a_ William G.Steier , a Bob Zonal Tom Daly DISTRICT NO.3: �_ Sal A.Satan,Chair Harry M.Damon • Burma Dunla0. Chair pre arm Glenn Parker •_ Cecilia Ape Walter Bowman y George Brown Marilyn Bruce Has4npa John Collier George Scott James H.Flons Steve Anderson a Mn R.Griffin Patsy Marshall a Victor Leipxie Ralph Bauer X Wally Liam Eva G.Miner Per McGuigan _ Ted R.Moremro may_ Margie L.Rice _ Grace Epperson *_ Julie Sa Chris Nub, _ Sheldon Singer George L.Vaket _ Roger Stamen ,� William G.Steiner x Charles Sylvia Robert Warrenton Bob Zemel Tom Daly DISTRICT NO.5: Jan Debay,Chair John C.Cox.Jr. Z Witham G.Steiner,Chair pro rem Roger Summit Julrr C.Cox,Jr. Jan Debay DISTRICT NO. 6: James M. Ferryman,Chair Arthur Perry JL_ Jan Debay.Clair pro leer John C.Cox,Jr. • William G.Steiner Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO.7: . Barry Hammond.Chew Mike Word y Thomas R.Salnrelli,Chair pro beer _ Jim Pogs y Jan Debay _ John C.Cox,Jr. x James M.Ferryman _ Arthur Perry Pat McGugan Ted A.Momme, is Mark A.Murphy Joanne Coome i William G.Stainer. Roger Stamon DISTRICT NO. 11: �. Voter Lopeig,Chair Ralph Bauer x Shirley Denloff,Chair pro ter Ralph Bauer Roger Stamon William G.Steiner DISTRICT NO. 13: Job. M.GvUbare n.Chair y Daniel T.North g Bob Zemel,Chair pro tern Tom Daly Mark A.Murphy _ Joanne Coon¢ Glenn Parker Bumie Dunlap William G. Stainer Roper Stanton DISTRICT NO. 14: x Thomas R.Sattarelli,Cher Jim Pons a Mark A.Murphy, Chair pro rem Joanna Coon¢ y Barry Hammond _ Mike Ward William G. Steiner Roper Stanton i Peer A.Swan Darryl Miller -2- 11/15/95 , STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Don McIntyre, General Manager, Blake P. Anderson, Assistant General Manager-Operations, Judith A. Wilson, Assistant General Manager-Administration, Penny Kyle, Board Secretary, John Finias, Gary Hasenstab, Irwin Haydock, Ed Hodges, Steve Hovey, Patricia Jonk, Terri Josway, Steve Kozak, John Linder, David Ludwin, Pat McNally, Mike Moore, Bob Ooten, Mike Peterman, Gary Streed, Jean Tappan, Michelle Tuchman, Dan Tunnicliff, Nancy Wheatley, Chuck Winsor OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Terry Andrus, Assistant General Counsel, Mark Asturias, Lolita Barrett, Bill Knopf, Mary Lee, Mike Noonan, Phil Stone, Vicki Wilson DISTRICT 13 Adjournment of meeting due to lack offauorum This 15th day of November, 1995, at 7:30 p.m., being the time and place for the Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, and there not being a quorum present in District No. 13, the meeting of said District was thereupon adjourned by the Secretary. DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14 Report of the Joint Chair The Joint Chair regretfully announced the passing of the Districts' Purchasing Manager for 19 years, Ted E. Hoffman. He then requested that the Districts adjourn this meeting in his honor and memory. Joint Chair Cox then advised that the working committees would not be meeting in December. The following tentatively scheduled upcoming meetings were then announced, as follows: Ad Hoc Committee Re Landfill Issues - Wednesday, December 13, at 4:00 p.m. Steering Committee - Wednesday, December 13, at 5:30 p.m. -3- 11/15/95 DISTRICT 1 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held October 25, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held October 25, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 3 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held October 25, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held October 25, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 6 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held October 25, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -4- 11/15/95 DISTRICT 7 Aooroval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held October 25, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 11 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held October 25, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 14 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held October 25, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14 Ratification of payment of Joint and Individual District Claims Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That payment of Joint and Individual District claims set forth on exhibits "A", "B", and "C" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. -5- ' 11/15/95 10/18/95 10 11/01/95 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $ 658,050.82 $119,358.63 $ 933,965.66 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 191,170.21 1,048,966.91 Joint Working Capital Fund - 254,453.48 198,213.79 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 14,232.27 46,644.44 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 0.00 120.00 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 21,735.55 15,650.52 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 43,949.80 84,786.67 DISTRICT NO, 5 - 3,866.17 7,089.92 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 0.00 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 170,893.99 28,100.79 DISTRICT NO, 11 - 150,986.15 1,273.51 DISTRICT NO. 13 - 0.00 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 14 - 213,199.03 1,026.93 DISTRICTS NOS. 3 & 11 JOINT - 1,437.50 0.00 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 42,738.90 6,234.68 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 0.00 2,596.34 DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 794.77 6,038.16 $1,767,508.64 $119.358.63 $2.380.708.32 DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14 Changing the Regular Joint Board meeting date due to the Thanksaivinc holiday Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the change in the Regular Joint Board meeting date from Wednesday, November 27, 1996 to Wednesday, November 20, 1996 at 7:30 p.m. due to the Thanksgiving holiday, be, and is hereby, approved. -6- 11/15/95 DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14 Chanoino the Reaular Joint Board meeting date due to the Christmas holiday Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the change in the Regular Joint Board meeting date from Wednesday, December 25, 1996 to Wednesday, December 18, 1996 at 7:30 p.m. due to the Christmas holiday, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14 Receive and file draft minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization Study Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the draft minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization Study meetings held on October 19, 1995, and November 2, 1995, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14 Receive and file draft minutes of the Steering Committee Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the draft minutes of the Steering Committee meeting held on October 25, 1995, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14 Receive and file draft minutes of the Operations. Maintenance. and Technical Services Committee Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the draft minutes of the Operations, Maintenance, and Technical Services Committee meeting held on November 1, 1995, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. -7- 11/15/95 DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14 Receive and file draft minutes of the Plannina. Design. and Construction Committee Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the draft minutes of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee meeting held on November 2, 1995, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14 Receive and file draft minutes of the Finance. Administration. and Human Resources Committee Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the draft minutes of the Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee meeting held on November 8, 1995, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14 Receive and file draft minutes of the Executive Committee Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the draft minutes-of the Executive Committee meeting held on November 8, 1995, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14 Approving Professional Services Aareement with Coleman/Caskev Architects. Inc.. for oreparation of Space Utilization Studv (Job No. J-38-1) Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization Study certification of the final negotiated fee relative to Professional Services Agreement with Coleman/Caskey Architects, Inc. for preparation of Space Utilization Study (Job No. J-38-1), be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed, and approved; and, -8- 11/15/95 FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 95-109, approving said agreement with Co(eman/Caskey Architects, Inc. for said services on an hourly rate basis for labor plus overhead, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $155,550.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14 (OMTS95-036A) Actions re Engineering Feasibility Studies Agreement with Southern California Edison re "ENVEST" Program Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Engineering Feasibility Studies Agreement with Southern California Edison "ENVEST" Program approved at the July 26, 1995 Joint Boards' meeting, be, and is hereby, voided; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to enter into a new comprehensive Agreement with the Southern California Edison (SCE) "ENVEST" Program to study energy conservation measures at the Districts' treatment plants, with no change in the previously authorized amount of $30,000.00, to include design and construction portions to SCE funding with provisions that actual execution of the design and construction phases are subject to future authorization by the Districts' Boards of Directors. DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14 (PDC95-34) Approving plans and specifications re Jobs Nos. P2-35-3, P1-38-5. P2-46. and P2-55 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 95-110, approving plans and specifications for Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-35-3; Process Area Fire Protection, Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 1, Job No. 131-38-5; Process Area Fire Protection, Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. P246; and, Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. 132-55, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -9- 11/15/95 DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7. 11 & 14 (PDC95-36) Authorizina staff to solicit proposals for Professional Services Agreements for planning, design. and construction services re Job Nos. J-39. J40-1. and J-40-2 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to solicit proposals for Professional Services Agreements for planning, design, and construction services for projects as follows: Investigation and Repair of Ocean Outfalls, Job No. J-39, Management of Peak Hydraulic Discharge, Job. No. J40-1; Determination of Financial Charges and Fee Structures, Job No. J-40-2 DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14 (FAHR95-381 Approving Professional Services Agreement with Kerry Consulting Group for Preparation of New Financial Information System and Implementation and Acceptance of the Selected Hardware and Software Solutions (Specification No. P-167) Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 95-111, approving Professional Services Agreement with Kerry Consulting Group for preparation of New Financial Information System, Phase III, Selection Process for Hardware and Software; and Phase IV, Implementation and Acceptance of the Selected Hardware and Software Solutions (Specification No. P-167), on an hourly-rate basis including labor, overhead, direct expenses and profit, plus out-of-pocket costs, for an amount not to exceed $58,263.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -10- 11/15/95 DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7,11 & 14 (FAHR9544) Revising Districts' Procedure for Settlement of Claims Made Against the Districts: Settlement of Claims Made by the Districts: Collection of Delinquent Accounts Owing to the Districts: Settlement of Civil or Administrative Actions: Settlement of Workers' Compensation Actions: Repealing Resolution Nos. 93-13 and 90-89 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 95-112, Revising Districts' Procedure for Settlement of Claims Made Against the Districts; Settlement of Claims Made by the Districts; Collection of Delinquent Accounts Owing to the Districts; Settlement of Civil or Administrative Actions; and Settlement of Worker's Compensation Actions; and repealing Resolution Nos. 93-13 and 90-89. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14 Receive, file, and approve Comprehensive Annual Financial Report prepared by staff and Moreland & Associates. Certified Public Accountants Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report prepared by staff and Moreland & Associates, Certified Public Accountants, for the year ending June 30, 1995, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed, and approved. DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7,11 & 14 (FPC95-13) Actions re Deferred Compensation Plan - Accountina for Participants' Contributions Authorize deposit with Lincoln National Insurance Plan Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Finance Director be, and is hereby, authorized to deposit $935,336.00 with Lincoln National Insurance Plan from the Joint Contingency Reserve Fund; and, FURTHER MOVED: That no imputed interest earnings adjustment be provided. -11- 11/15/95 Authorize transfer and credit of entire value of receivable due from the County of Orange Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Finance Director be, and is hereby, authorized to transfer and credit the entire value of the receivable due from the County of Orange, pursuant to the Bankruptcy settlement, to the Districts' CORF and General Operating Budgets Contingency Reserve Funds, and to remove the value of any such receivable from all funds other than the Reserve Funds. Restore all funds except Continaencv Reserve Funds to pre-bankruptcy balances Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Finance Director be, and is hereby, authorized to restore all funds except the Contingency Reserve Funds to their respective pre-bankruptcy petition balances. Authorize deposit of proceeds from Bankruptcy Settlement Aareements to CORF and General Operating Budgets Contingency Reserve Funds Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Finance Director be, and is hereby, authorized, upon receipt of proceeds from the Bankruptcy Settlement Agreements, to deposit these proceeds to the respective CORF and General Operating Budgets Contingency Reserve Funds. -12- 11/15/95 DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14 (EXEC95-04) Aporovina Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1.2.3. 5.6.7.11. & 13 and County Sanitation District No. 14 re Purchase and Sale of Capacity Rights in Treatment. Disposal. and Sewer Facilities Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 95-113, approving Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, and 13 and County Sanitation District No. 14, for Purchase and Sale of Capacity Rights in Treatment, Disposal and Sewer Facilities, modifying said agreement to provide for changes in the method of calculation of District No. 14's annual CORF budget and Annual Integration Adjustment, and to comply with CSDOC's reserve policy. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14 Receive. file, and approve staff Summary Financial Report for three-month period ending Seotember 30. 1995 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the staff Summary Financial Report for the three-month period ending September 30, 1995, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed, and approved. DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14 Actions re Ocean Outfall Booster Station Control System Uoorade at Plants Nos. 1 & 2. Job No. J-31-2 Approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Ocean Outfall Booster Station Control System Upgrade at Plants Nos. 1 & 2, Job No. J-31-2, be, and is hereby, approved. -13- 11/15/95 Awarding contract for Ocean Outfall Booster Station Control System Upgrade at Plants No. 1 & 2. Job No. J-31-2. to Shasta Electric. LP Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 95-114, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Ocean Outfall Booster Station Control System Upgrade at Plants Nos. 1 &2, Job No. J-31-2, to Shasta Electric, LP, in the total corrected amount of $880,820.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14 Approving Standardized Emergency Management System Operational Agreement (SEMS)with the County of Orange The Assistant General Manager, Judy Wilson, introduced Dan Tunnicliff, Districts' Safety and Emergency Response Specialist, who gave a brief presentation to the Directors of the Districts' participation in the County of Orange Emergency Management System. It was then moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 95-115, approving Standardized Emergency Management System Operational Area Agreement (SEMS) with the County of Orange. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -14- 11/15/95 DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14 Actions re first reading and introduction of Proposed Ordinance No. 128 Providing for an Early Retirement Incentive Proaram to Eligible Districts' Employees Verbal Report of General Counsel The Districts' General Counsel reported that the proposed ordinance requires the Districts to have a roll-call vote authorizing District No. 1 to adopt the ordinance, as joint agent, on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11. 13 and 14. Authorizing District No. 1 to enact an Ordinance implementing the program Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That proposed Ordinance No. 128, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Providing for an Early Retirement Incentive Program by Granting Additional Service Credit to Eligible Districts' Employees as Authorized by the County Employees' Retirement Law of 1937, Government Code Section 31641.04, be, and is hereby, approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That District No. 1 be, and is hereby, authorized to enact an Ordinance implementing the program. First Reading of Proposed Ordinance No. 128 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That proposed Ordinance No. 128, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Providing for an Early Retirement Incentive Program by Granting Additional Service Credit to Eligible Districts' Employees as Authorized by the County Employees' Retirement Law of 1937, Government Code Section 31641.04, be read by title only, and that reading of said Ordinance in its entirety be waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 128 by title only, it was moved, seconded, and duly carried: -15- 11/15/95 That Ordinance No. 128, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Providing for an Early Retirement Incentive Program by Granting Additional Service Credit to Eligible Districts' Employees as Authorized by the County Employees' Retirement Law of 1937, Government Code Section 31641.04, be introduced and passed to second reading and adoption at the December 13, 1995 Board Meeting. DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14 Status report re proposed acquisition of County of Orange Integrated Waste Management System Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager of Operations, gave a brief report and update on the feasibility of acquiring the County of Orange landfill system. DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14 Status report re County's Commingled Investment Pool The Assistant General Manager of Operations gave a brief report on the status of the Orange County Commingled Investment Pool and the County of Orange bankruptcy. DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14 Actions re introduction and adoption of proposed Urgency Ordinances, Reoealing Ordinances Establishing and Payment of Excess Capacity Charges Repealing District Ordinance Ordinances 1 129 125& 127 2 221 219&220 3 324 322 & 323 5 533 531 & 532 6 627 625&626 7 734 732 &733 11 1123 1121 & 1122 14 1409 1407& 1408 -16- 11/15/95 Verbal report of General Manager The General Manager reported that excess capacity charges, which became effective July 1, 1995, was an attempt to rationalize the process of evaluating how to arrive at appropriate excess capacity charges. This was met with considerable opposition and concern by the Business Council, Legislators, and city councils as it might impact major industries moving into the community. After a series of meetings with various concerned parties, it was concluded that the Districts should be more sensitive to the needs and concerns of the cities and business owners to rescind the ordinances and return to the system in place prior to July 1, 1995, and invite the Business Council to work with staff in developing a new excess capacity charge program. DISTRICT 1 Actions re adoption of Ordinance No. 129 Making finding that adoption of Ordinance No. 129 is statutorily exempt oer CEQA Guidelines Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 129, An Urgency Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Repealing Ordinance Nos. 125 and 127 and Amending Ordinance No. 119, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15307 and 15308 in that the Ordinance establishes regulatory processes to be taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment and natural resources. Reading of Proposed Ordinance No. 129 Moved, seconded, and duly carried by unanimous vote: That proposed Ordinance No. 129, An Urgency Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Repealing Ordinance Nos. 125 and 127 and Amending Ordinance No. 119, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, be read by title only, and that reading of said Ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived. _17_ 11/15/95 Adoption of Ordinance No. 129 Moved, seconded, and duly carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Pat McGuigan, Chair, James M. Ferryman, Thomas R. Saltarelli, William G. Steiner NOES: None ABSENT: Mark A. Murphy That Ordinance No. 129, An Urgency Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Repealing Ordinance Nos. 125 and 127 and Amending Ordinance No. 119, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, be, and is hereby, adopted as an urgency measure to be effective immediately. DISTRICT 2 Actions re adoption of Ordinance No. 221 Making finding that adoption of Ordinance No. 221 is statutorily exempt per CEQA Guidelines Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 221, An Urgency Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, Repealing Ordinance Nos. 219 and 220 and Amending Ordinance No. 214, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15307 and 15308 in that the Ordinance establishes regulatory processes to be taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment and natural resources. Reading of Proposed Ordinance No, 221 Moved, seconded, and duly carried by unanimous vote: That proposed Ordinance No. 221, An Urgency Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, Repealing Ordinance Nos. 219 and 220 and Amending Ordinance No. 214, -18- 11/15/95 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, be read by title only, and that reading of said Ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived. Adoption of Ordinance No, 221 Moved, seconded, and duly carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: John Collins, Chair, Barry Denes, Norman Z. Eckenrode, James H. Flora, Pat McGuigan, Sheldon S. Singer, William G. Steiner, Daniel T. Welch NOES: None ABSENT: Burnie Dunlap, Mark A. Murphy, Julie Sa, Bob Zemel That Ordinance No. 221, An Urgency Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, Repealing Ordinance Nos. 219 and 220 and Amending Ordinance No. 214, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, be, and is hereby, adopted as an urgency measure to be effective immediately. DISTRICT 3 Actions re adoption of Ordinance No. 324 Making finding that adoption of Ordinance No. 324 is statutorily exempt per CEQA Guidelines Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 324, An Urgency Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, Repealing Ordinance Nos. 322 and 323 and Amending Ordinance No. 317, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15307 and 15308 in that the Ordinance establishes regulatory processes to be taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment and natural resources. -19- 11/15/95 Readina of Proposed Ordinance No 324 Moved, seconded, and duly carried by unanimous vote: That proposed Ordinance No. 324, An Urgency Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, Repealing Ordinance Nos. 322 and 323 and Amending Ordinance No. 317, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, be read by title only, and that reading of said Ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived. Adoption of Ordinance No. 324 Moved, seconded, and duly carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Sal A. Sapien, Chair, George Brown, John Collins, James H. Flora, Victor Leipzig, Wally Linn, Pat McGuigan, Margie L. Rice, Sheldon S. Singer, William G. Steiner, Charles E. Sylvia NOES: None ABSENT: Cecilia Age, Burnie Dunlap, Don R. Griffin, Julie Sa, Bob Zemel That Ordinance No. 324, An Urgency Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, Repealing Ordinance Nos. 322 and 323 and Amending Ordinance No. 317, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, be, and is hereby, adopted as an urgency measure to be effective immediately. DISTRICT 5 Actions re adoption of Ordinance No. 533 Making finding that adoption of Ordinance No. 533 is statutorily exempt per CEQA Guidelines Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 533, An Urgency Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Repealing Ordinance Nos. 531 and 532 and Amending Ordinance No. 526, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of Sewerage Facilities, is statutorily exempt pursuant to -20- 11/15/95 California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15307 and 15308 in that the Ordinance establishes regulatory processes to be taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment and natural resources. Reading of Proposed Ordinance No. 533 Moved, seconded, and duly carried by unanimous vote: That proposed Ordinance No. 533, An Urgency Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Repealing Ordinance Nos. 531 and 532 and Amending Ordinance No. 526, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, be read by title only, and that reading of said Ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived. Adoption of Ordinance No. 533 Moved, seconded, and duly carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Jan Debay, Chair, John C. Cox, Jr., William G. Steiner NOES: None ABSENT: None That Ordinance No. 533, An Urgency Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Repealing Ordinance Nos. 531 and 532 and Amending Ordinance No. 526, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, be, and is hereby, adopted as an urgency measure to be effective immediately. DISTRICT 6 Actions re adoption of Ordinance No. 627 Making finding that adoption of Ordinance No. 627 is statutorily exempt per CEQA Guidelines Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 627, An Urgency Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District -21- 11/15/95 No. 6 of Orange County, California, Repealing Ordinance Nos. 625 and 626 and Amending Ordinance No. 620, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15307 and 15308 in that the Ordinance establishes regulatory processes to be taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment and natural resources. Readina of Proposed Ordinance No. 627 Moved, seconded, and duly carried by unanimous vote: That proposed Ordinance No. 627, An Urgency Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Repealing Ordinance Nos. 625 and 626 and Amending Ordinance No. 620, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, be read by title only, and that reading of said Ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived. Adoption of Ordinance No. 627 Moved, seconded, and duly carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: James M. Ferryman, Chair, Jan Debay, William G. Steiner NOES: None ABSENT: None That Ordinance No. 627, An Urgency Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Repealing Ordinance Nos. 625 and 626 and Amending Ordinance No. 620, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, be, and is hereby, adopted as an urgency measure to be effective immediately. _22_ 11/15/95 DISTRICT 7 Actions re adoption of Ordinance No. 734 Making finding that adoption of Ordinance No. 734 is statutorily exempt per CEQA Guidelines Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 734, An Urgency Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, Repealing Ordinance Nos. 732 and 733 and Amending Ordinance No. 727, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15307 and 15308 in that the Ordinance establishes regulatory processes to be taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment and natural resources. Reading of Proposed Ordinance No. 734 Moved, seconded, and duly carried by unanimous vote: That proposed Ordinance No. 734, An Urgency Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, Repealing Ordinance Nos. 732 and 733 and Amending Ordinance No. 727, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, be read by title only, and that reading of said Ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived. Adoption of Ordinance No. 734 Moved, seconded, and duly carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Barry Hammond, Chair, Jan Debay, James M. Ferryman, Pat McGuigan, Thomas R. Saltarelli, William G. Steiner NOES: None ABSENT: Mark A. Murphy That Ordinance No. 734, An Urgency Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, Repealing Ordinance Nos. 732 and 733 and Amending Ordinance No. 727, Establishing -23- 11/15/95 Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, be, and is hereby, adopted as an urgency measure to be effective immediately. DISTRICT 11 Actions re adoption of Ordinance No. 1123 Making finding that adoption of Ordinance No. 1123 is statutorily exempt per CEOA Guidelines Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 1123, An Urgency Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, Repealing Ordinance Nos. 1121 and 1122 and Amending Ordinance No. 1116, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15307 and 15308 in that the Ordinance establishes regulatory processes to be taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment and natural resources. Reading of Proposed Ordinance No. 1123 Moved, seconded, and duly carried by unanimous vote: That proposed Ordinance No. 1123, An Urgency Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, Repealing Ordinance Nos. 11215 and 1122 Amending Ordinance No. 1116, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, be read by title only, and that reading of said Ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived. Adoption of Ordinance No. 1123 Moved, seconded, and duly carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Victor Leipzig, Chair, Shirley Dettloff, William G. Steiner NOES: None ABSENT: None -24- 11/15/95 That Ordinance No. 1123, An Urgency Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, Repealing Ordinance Nos. 1121 and 1122 and Amending Ordinance No. 1116, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, be, and is hereby, adopted as an urgency measure to be effective immediately. DISTRICT 14 Actions re adoption of Ordinance No. 1409 Making finding that adoption of Ordinance No. 1409 is statutorily exempt per CEQA Guidelines Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 1409, An Urgency Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 of Orange County, California, Repealing Ordinance Nos. 1407 and 1408, Relating to the Establishment of Excess Capacity Charges, is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15307 and 15308 in that the Ordinance establishes regulatory processes to be taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment and natural resources. Readino of Proposed Ordinance No, 1409 Moved, seconded, and duly carried by unanimous vote: That proposed Ordinance No. 1409, An Urgency Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 of Orange County, California, Repealing Ordinance Nos. 1407 and 1408, Relating to the Establishment of Excess Capacity Charges be read by title only, and that reading of said Ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived. -25- 11/1 5/95 Adoption of Ordinance No. 1409 Moved, seconded, and duly carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Thomas R. Saltarelli, Chair, Barry Hammond, William G. Steiner, Peer A. Swan NOES: None ABSENT: Mark A. Murphy That Ordinance No. 1409, An Urgency Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 of Orange County, California, Repealing Ordinance Nos. 1407 and 1408, Relating to the Establishment of Excess Capacity Charges, be, and is hereby, adopted as an urgency measure to be effective immediately. DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7.11 & 14 Actions re supplemental Agenda Item relative to Summons and Complaint to Enforce Stop Notice. GE Supply, a division of General Electric Company. vs. Advanco Constructors Inc.. and County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Orange County Municipal Court Case No. 219240 re Job No. P1-36-1 Authorizing consideration of Supplemental Agenda Item relative to Summons and Complaint to Enforce Stop Notice GE Supply a division of General Electric Company, vs. Advanco Constructors. Inc.. and County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Orange County Municipal Court Case No. 219240 re Job No. P1-36-1 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors do hereby authorize consideration of supplemental agenda item relative to Summons and Complaint to Enforce Stop Notice, GE Supply, a division of General Electric Company, vs. Advanco Constructors, Inc., and County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Orange County Municipal Court Case No. 219240, in connection with Electrification of Pump Drives at Treatment Plant No. 1, Job -26- 11/15/95 No. P1-36-1, which was not posted 72 hours prior to the Board meeting because the need to take said actions arose subsequent to the agenda being posted. Receive and file Summons and Complaint to Enforce Stop Notice. GE Supply. a division of General Electric Comoanv. vs. Advanco Constructors. Inc.. and County Sanitation Districts of Oranae County. Orange County Municipal Court Case No. 219240 re Job No. P1-36-1 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Summons and Complaint to Enforce Stop Notice, GE Supply, a division of General Electric Company, vs. Advanco Constructors, Inc., and County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Orange County Municipal Court Case No. 219240, in connection with Electrification of Pump Drives at Treatment Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36-1, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed, and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Districts' General Counsel be, and is hereby, authorized to appear and defend the interests of the Districts. DISTRICT 1 Journment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned in memory of Ted E. Hoffman, Purchasing Manager. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:18 p.m. DISTRICT 2 IOMTS95-0461 AAgproving Permit Agreement with Serrano Water District and authorizing one-time excess capacity charge payment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Permit Agreement between Serrano Water District and District No. 2, authorizing a one-time excess capacity charge payment of$26,404.49, be, and is hereby, approved. -27- 11/15/95 DISTRICT 2 Joumment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned in memory of Ted E. Hoffman, Purchasing Manager. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:18 p.m. DISTRICT 3 Adiournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned in memory of Ted E. Hoffman, Purchasing Manager. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:18 p.m. DISTRICT 5 Adioumment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned in memory of Ted E. Hoffman, Purchasing Manager. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:18 p.m. DISTRICT 6 Adioumment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned in memory of Ted E. Hoffman, Purchasing Manager. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:18 p.m. _28_ 11/15/95 DISTRICT 7 AApprovino aoreement with Oranae County Flood Control District re Contract No. 7-1-2 in condunction with OCFCD Improvements to the Santa Ana-Delhi Channel Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 95-116-7, approving Agreement with the Orange County Flood Control District, providing for reimbursement of costs to the Flood Control District for Relocation of Gisler-Red Hill Trunk Sewer Siphon under the Santa Ana-Delhi Channel, Contract No. 7-1-2, in conjunction with OCFCD improvements to the Santa Ana-Delhi Channel within the Cities of Tustin, Irvine, Santa Ana, Costa Mesa and unincorporated County territory; and, FURTHER MOVED: That payment of$78,750.00 for District's portion of said work, be, and is hereby, authorized. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Joumment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned in memory of Ted E. Hoffman, Purchasing Manager. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:18 p.m. DISTRICT 11 Adiournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned in memory of Ted E. Hoffman, Purchasing Manager. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:18 p.m. -29- 11/15/95 DISTRICT 14 Adgoumment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned in memory of Ted E. Hoffman, Purchasing Manager. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:18 p.m. Secretary of theards irectors of County Sanita ion Di cts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, and 14 -30- FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10/1 W95 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10/18MS POSTING DATE 10/78195 WARRANTNO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 147528 AG TECH COMPANY $51.669.45 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 147529 AT&T-PROWATTS $2,71D.45 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 147530 A-Z LOGIC SYSTEMS $293.03 LAB SUPPLIES 147631 ABRASIVE ENG.TOOLING B EQUIP. $213.07 HARDWARE 147532 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $54.111.60 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.O.B-9A9 147533 ALHAMBRA FOUNDRY CO LTD $4.859.53 MANHOLE FRAMES&COVERS 147534 ALTA-ROBBINS $388.40 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 147535 AMERICAN AIR FILTER,INC. $1.887.94 MECHANICAL PARTS 147536 AMERICAN AIRLINES $4,596.76 TRAVEL SERVICES 147537 AMOCO ENERGY TRADING $43,650.03 NATURAL GAS MO 6-28-95 147536 ANGEL SCIENTIFIC $649.47 LAB SUPPLIES 147539 ANIXTER-DISTRIBUTION $4.745.34 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 147540 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $2,649.85 NOTICES&ADS 147541 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT $2,914.39 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 147542 ARROWHEAD ELECTRIC CORP. $83.94 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 147543 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. $60.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL TIT 147644 ATKIWJONES COMPUTER SERVICE $321.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT x 147546 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $3.383.70 PAYROLL SERVICES .z.. 147546 AWARDS B TROPHIES $152.82 PLAQUES CO 147547 BANANA BLUEPRINT $3.021.74 PRINTING M.O.11-07-94 147548 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $954.78 BATTERIES 147649 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $1.430.32 LAB SUPPLIES D 147550 BENZ ENGINEERING,INC. $194.50 COMPRESSOR PARTS f+ 147551 810-GRO DIVISION $50,500.26 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 4-26-95 147552 BISHOP'S SANITARY $252.14 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 147553 BLOOMBERG L.P. $4.832.59 FINANCIAL MONITORING M.O.4-14-93 147554 BOOT BARN $96.86 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 147555 BROADWAY MOTEL $272.29 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 147556 CS COMPANY $4,714.93 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 147557 CWEA 1995 SRTC $440.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 147558 CADIRECTION $11,340.80 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 147559 CALFON CONSTRUCTION $167.695.11 CONSTRUCTION 7-22&7-24 147560 CALTROL,INC. $1.231.18 HARDWARE 147561 CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL STATISTIC $400.00 DIRECT&OVERLAPPING DEBT STATEMENT 147662 CANUS CORPORATION $49.862.39 FIBER OPTIC CABLE 147563 CAPITAL WESTWARD $47.56 MECHANICAL PARTS 147564 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $1,827.62 ENGINEERING SERVICES 147565 CENTURY SAFETY INST.&SUPPLY $2.073.86 SAFETY SUPPLIES 147566 COLE-PARMER INSTRUMENT CO. $280.01 LAB SUPPLIES 147567 COLICH&SONS $140.000.00 CONSTRUCTION 11-17-1 147568 CONNELL GM PARTS I DIV. $173.97 TRUCK PARTS 147569 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $2.412.10 ELECTRIC PARTS 147570 CONSUMER PIPE $1,613.21 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 147571 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC. $4.755.42 TOOLS 147572 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $883.43 ENGINE PARTS 147573 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $510.13 TRUCK PARTS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10113/96 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBERAP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10/18/95 POSTING DATE 10/18/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 147674 COUNTY CLERK $25.00 EXEMPTION FEE 147675 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $1.032.55 ELECTRIC PARTS 147576 CHARLES P.CROWLEY,CO. $689.95 INSTRUMENT PARTS 147577 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION $214.59 UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE FEE 147578 DAVE'S BICYCLES,INC. $269.12 BIKE REPAIRS 147579 DE GUELLE&SONS GLASS CO $61.87 SAFETY GLASS 147680 DELTA PACKAGING PRODUCTS.INC. $347.00 LAB SUPPLIES 147581 DEZURICK AND/OR CS CO. $10,955.02 VALVES 147582 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $940.00 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 147583 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $255.84 PAINT SUPPLIES 147584 DUALS SALES $384.47 FITTINGS 147585 ECONOMICS PRESS,INC. $45.50 SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL 147586 EDWARDS HIGH VACUUM INTER. $79.75 LAB SUPPLIES 147587 ELECTRO TEST,INC. $5.010.00 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 147588 ENCHANTER,INC. $4,200.00 OCEAN MONITORING MO 5.24-95 147589 FMC CORPORATION $61,357.76 HYDROGEN PEROXIDE MO 9.14-94 M 147590 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $2.195.00 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M01U-9-91 X 147591 FISCHER 8 PORTER CO. $620.96 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 147592 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $1,333.95 LAB SUPPLIES DO 147593 FLAT B VERTICAL,INC. $125.00 CONCRETE CUTTING �--1 147594 FLOSYSTEMS $1,310.55 PUMP PARTS D 147595 CUFFORDAFORKERT $2,506.00 SURVEYING SERVICES MO 8-8-94 I 147596 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $107.46 PHOTO SUPPLIES N 147597 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $17,468.92 WATER USE 147596 THE FOXBORO CO. $227.26 INSTRUMENT PARTS 147599 FRY'S ELECTRONICS $1,609.60 ELECTRONIC B COMPUTER SUPPLIES 1476M CITY OF FULLERTON $246.76 WATER USE 147601 EST,INC. $23.523.21 OFFICE SUPPLIES - 147602 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $192.53 LUMBERIHARDWARE 147603 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $2.645.69 CHEMICALS 147604 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1,039.85 TELEPHONE SERVICES 147605 GIERLICH-MITCHELL,INC. $2,111.13 PUMP PARTS 147606 GRASSY S.T.I. $3,866.77 ENGINE PARTS 147607 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $8.204.89 PRINTING 14780E DGA CONSULTANTS $650.00 SURVEYING SERVICES MO 6-11-94 147609 HB TYPE S GRAPHICS $282.31 PRINTING 147610 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $70.90 TRUCK PARTS ' 147611 HARBOUR ENGINEERING $15.671.00 MECHANICAL PARTS 147612 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $644.12 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 147613 HAWKINS ASSOCIATES $1,040.00 LAB EQUIPMENT 147614 PL HAWN CO,INC. $696.67 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 147615 HELPMATES PERSONNEL SERVICES $1.036.08 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 147616 HEWLETT PACKARD $805.98 LAB SUPPLIES 147617 HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL $102.40 WORKERS COMP CLAIM 147618 HOLMES B NARVER,INC. $71,830.31 ENGINEERING SERVICES NO 9.14-N&3$95 147619 HOME DEPOT $1,840.88 HARDWARE FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10/13/95 PAGE 3 ' REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID IOIIW95 POSTING DATE 10118M5 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 147620 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $694.71 PAINT SUPPLIES 147621 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $21.00 WATER USE 147622 IDEXX $144.24 LAB SUPPLIES 147623 IPCO SAFETY $14,879.34 SAFETY SUPPLIES 147624 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $81,752.50 FERRIC CHLORIDE M011-18-92 147625 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $412.31 BATTERIES 147628 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $4.90 WATER USE 147627 IRVINE SCI-TECH BOOKS $166.88 PUBLICATIONS 147628 J.D.I.TECHNOLOGIES $611.95 PRINTER PARTS 147629 JIT COMPUTER SOURCE,INC. $1,492.34 SOFTWARE 147630 JACK X CHANGE $107.70 FLOOR JACK 147631 JAMISON ENGINEERING $16,892.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 147632 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $1,457.66 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 147633 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $966.78 ELECTRIC PARTS 147634 JONES CHEMICALS,INC. $17,097.48 SODIUM HYP0CHL0RITE M04-28-95 147635 KEYE PRODUCTIVITY CENTER S79D.00 INVENTORY SEMINAR m 147636 KEYE PRODUCTIVITY CENTER $139.00 WAREHOUSE MANAGEMENT SEMINAR X 147637 KIMMERLE BROS.INC. $392,81 MECHANICAL PARTS 147638 KING SEARING,INC. $756.90 MACHINE SUPPLIES w 147639 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $1,020.69 TOOLS --i 147640 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $1,292.08 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICE 147641 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY CO. $178.07 SAFETY SUPPLIES n 147642 LEE&RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC. $19.568.80 ENGINEERING SERVICES MO 524-95&124"3 Ajl 147643 K.P.LINDSTROM.INC. $7,100.95 ENVIR.CONSULTING SERVICES MO 12.9-90 147644 LUSTRE-CAL $612.95 SAFETY 147645 MBC APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL $70.75 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.&-lD-92 147646 MDT BIOLOGIC COMPANY $242.43 LAB SUPPLIES 147647 MPS $436.93 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES - 147648 MANGAN,INC. $1.612.00 CONTRACT SERVICES 147949 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $60.13 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 147650 MATT-CHLOR,INC. $212.49 FERRIC CHLORIDE SUPPLIES 147651 MCBAIN INSTRUMENTS $420.00 LAB SUPPLIES 147652 MCCROMETER $603.89 METER PARTS 147653 MCMAHAN DESK,INC. $48.11 SAFETY SUPPLIES 147654 MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. 5412.41 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 147655 METROSONICS,INC. $8,124.35 ELECTRICAL PARTS 147656 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3.460.55 UNIFORM RENTALS ' 147657 MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION $202,513.37 CONSTRUCTION 14Y1A 147658 MONITOR LABS $808.43 INSTRUMENT 147659 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES $1.437.60 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 147660 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $1.655.31 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 147661 NEW HORIZONS COMPUTER CENTERS,INC. $4,200.00 SOFTWARE TRAINING CLASSES 147662 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $6.87 WATER USE 147663 NICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY $1.085.26 LUBRICANTSIOIESEL FUEL 147664 NORM'S REFRIGERATION&ICE EQUIPMENT $23.81 ELECTRICAL PARTS 147NS NORTEL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS $2.764.00 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10/13195 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10/18195 POSTING DATE 10/18/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 147666 OI CORPORATION $376.67 LAB SUPPLIES 147667 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $169.00 SAFETY GLASSES 147668 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $4.252.97 OFFICE SUPPLIES 147669 OMEGA CORPORATION $375.00 SECURITY SYSTEM REPAIRS 147670 ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING SERVICE,INC. $600.00 LINE STRIPING 147671 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $1.010,48 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 147672 ORANGE RESOURCE RECOVERY SYSTEM $32.01 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 147673 ORANGE VALVE S FITTING CO. $1.122.23 FITTINGS 147674 OXYGEN SERVICE $3,120.44 SPECIALTY GASES 147675 COUNTY OF ORANGE $210.00 USER FEE CHANGE PROCESSING 147676 CSDOC WORKERS COMP INSURANCE ACCOUNT $14.129.87 WORKERS COMPENSATION REIMBURSEMENT 147677 COUNTY OF ORANGE $481.00 PERMITS 147678 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT $25,094.50 GAP WATER USE MO 6.9-93 147679 PSI REPAIR SERVICES,INC. $484.17 INSTRUMENT PARTS 147680 PSOC(POOL SUPPLY OF OC) $155.41 OPERATING SUPPLIES 147681 PSSI $3.232.80 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION m 147682 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $281.26 PLUMBING SUPPLIES x 147683 PACIFIC PARTS $34,416.24 INSTRUMENT PARTS s 147684 PACIFIC BELL $131.84 TELEPHONE SERVICES 147685 PAGENET $1,030.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT �-. 147686 PEABODY $2.389.14 PUMP PARTS 147687 DR.C.H.PETERSON $8,500.00 OCEAN MONITORING WORKSHOP y 147688 CSDOC PETTY CASH ACCOUNT $12.439.32 REIMS.PETTY CASH,TRAINING&TRAVEL 147689 THOMAS M.PIKE JR $7.500.00 PROPERTY APPRAISAL 147690 THE PLANNING REPORT $199.00 SUBSCRIPTION 147691 POLYPURE,INC. $191066.89 CATIONIC POLYMER MO 3.11-92 147692 POWDERCOAT SERVICES#4 $156.24 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 147693 POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO. $71.39 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES - 147694 PROCESS EQUIPMENT COMPANY $2.402.94 PUMP PARTS 147696 PROFESSIONAL MOBILE REMODELING $19,143.00 CONTRACT SERVICES 147696 PUTZMEISTER,INC. $1.728.03 PUMP PARTS 147697 RJN COMPUTER SERVICES,INC. $17,655.00. MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 147698 R 8 R INSTRUMENTS $1,599.18 ELECTRIC PARTS 147699 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $2,112.75 TRASH REMOVAL 147700 THE REGISTER $711.20 NOTICES&ADS 147701 REMEDYTEMP $924.63 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 147702 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $3.988.32 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 147703 HOWARD RIDLEY.CO. $1,500.00 CONTRACTSERVICE 147704 RM MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL AND/OR RTTTAL $33,92 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 147705 ROSEMOUNT ANALYTICAL,INC. $160.32 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 14770E SAFETY WEST $1,881.07 INSTRUMENT PARTS 147707 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $440.23 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 147708 SANWA BANK $10.659.60 CONSTRUCTION 14-14A 147709 BASCO ELECTRIC $8,956.00 CONTRACT SERVICES 147710 SCHWIND AMERICA.INC. $1,132.27 PUMP PARTS 147711 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $364.50 SPECIALTY GASES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10/13/95 PAGES - REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 1WIW95 POSTING DATE 10/18/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 147712 SETON NAME PLATE CO. $85.95 LAB SUPPLIES 147713 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $2,905.55 TOOLS 147714 SHURELUCK SALES $8.840.41 TOOLSHARDWARE 147715 SIMS WELDING SUPPLY $365.00 DEMURRAGE 147710 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $1.166.20 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 147717 SMITH-EMERY CO. $526.50 SOIL TESTING MO 7.13-94 147718 SMITH PIPE 8 SUPPLY $297.34 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 147719 SOIL 8 PLANT LABORATORY $47.00 SOIL TESTING 147720 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. $47,634.66 POWER 147721 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $24.201.33 NATURAL GAS 147722 SO.CALIFORNIA MARINE INST. $800.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 147723 SPARLING INSTRUMENT CO.,INC. $146.19 METER 147724 SPECIALIZED PRODUCTS CO. $345.14 OFFICE TOOLS 147725 SPEX CHEMICAL 8 SAMPLE PREP $338.22 LAB SUPPLIES 141726 STERLING ART $15.61 ART SUPPLIES 147727 SUMMIT STEEL $888.94 METAL m 147728 SUNSET FORD $352.60 TRUCK PARTS X 147722 SUPER CHEM CORP. S404.07 CHEMICALS = 147730 SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS $544.00 SUBSCRIPTION .. UD 147731 SUPER POWER PRODUCTS E206.88 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 147732 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $184.32 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 147733 TELE-CELL,INC. $5.427.83 TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT a 147734 THEODORE ROBBINS FORD $226.32 VEHICLE RENTALSUMMER PROGRAM U'I 147735 THOMPSON PUBLISHING GROUP $238.00 PUBLICATION 147736 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $2.124.56 MECHANICAL PARTS 147737 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE,INC. $7.736.45 TRUCK PARTS 147738 TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY,INC. $3,973.84 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING MO 5-71-94 147739 TRUESDAIL LABS $5.083.76 LAB SERVICES 147740 JG TUCKER 8 SON,INC. $11.895.66 INSTRUMENT PARTS 147741 U.S.AUTO GLASS CENTERS $164.00 TRUCK PARTS 147742 UDUMCGRAW-HILL $170.55 PUBLICATION 147743 VWR SCIENTIFIC $2,124.71 LAB SUPPLIES 147744 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $211.46 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 147745 VERNE'S PLUMBING $1,775.00 PLUMBING SERVICES 147746 VERTEX BUSINESS INTERIORS $1,293.00 OFFICE FURNITURE 147747 VERTEX TECHNOLOGIES,INC. $1.494.13 FIBER OPTICS 147748 VERTEX SYSTEMS $2.295.00 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT ' 147749 V 8 ETREE SERVICE,INC. $750.00 GROUNDSKEEPING 147750 WACKENHUTCORP. $6.982.90 CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS MO 8-23.95 147751 WAL-CON CONSTRUCTION CO. $42.716.22 CONSTRUCTION 5-37.3 147752 WARRINGTON $115.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 147753 WAXIE $7,594.86 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 147754 SKIP WESTCOTT $650.00 METER REPAIR 147755 WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCTS $631.45 SAFETY SUPPLIES 147756 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $50.448.61 CAUSTIC SODA NO 8.23.95 147757 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $777.85 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10/13/95 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10/18/95 POSTING DATE 10/18/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR 147758 XEROX CORP. $23,498.31 COPIER LEASES 147759 YORK INTERNATIONAL $47.62 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 147760 RICHARD YOUNG PRODUCTS $474.89 INSTRUMENT PARTS TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 10/18/95 E1,767,50B.64 SUMMARY AMOUNT #2 OPER FUND $783.39 #2 CAP FAC FUND $20.952.16 #3 OPER FUND $38,368.90 03 CAP FAC FUND $5,680.00 #5 OPER FUND 93,092.17 95 CAP FAC FUND $774.00 07 OPER FUND $3,063.56 nl #7 CAP FAC FUND $167,830.43 x #11 OPER FUND $10,973.78 #11 CAP FAC FUND $140.012.37 #14 CAP FAC FUND $213,199.03 #3&11 OPER FUND $1.437.50 #586 CAP FAC FUND 942,738.90 #7914 OPER FUND $794.77 m JT OPER FUND 5658,050.82 CORF E191,170.21 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $14.232.27 Jf DIST WORKING CAPITAL $264.453.48 $1.767,508.64 FUND NO 9199 - .R DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1024/94 PAGE i REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10P24195 POSTING DATE 1024/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 147781 PIMA ORO SYSTEMS,INC. $119,358.63 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3-29-95 TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 1024195 5119,358.83 SUMMARY AMOUNT H OPER FUND $119,358.63 $119,358.63 m x x Od to FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10/27/95 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 119195 POSTING DATE 1110195 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 147782 ATM AA,INC. $1,124.54 LAB SERVICES 147783 AT&T-MEGACOM SERVICE $967.80 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 147784 ABANNER IDEA $600.17 COMMUNICATIONS SUPPLIES 147785 ACORN CONSULTING $6.175.00 CONSULTING SERVICES 147786 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $18.037.20 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.O.&9-69 147767 AIR PERMIT REPORT $446.00 SUBSCRIPTION 147788 ALBERTSON'S MARKET#604 $1.135.88 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 147789 AMERIDATA $6,352.94 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 147790 AMERICAN SIGMA $242.66 OPERATING SUPPLIES 147791 AMOCO ENERGY TRADING CORP. $58,300.76 NATURAL GAS M.O.6-28-95 147792 CITYOFANAHEIM $24.987.00 INSPECTION SERVICES-CONTRACT 3.3511 147793 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION $13,587.56 SEWER REPAIRS 147794 BLACE P.ANDERSON $113.01 REIMBURSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE 147795 ANIXTER-DISTRIBUTION $598.21 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 147796 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL $330.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 147797 AQUATIC BIOASSAY&CONSULTING $4,895.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT M 147796 ARMOR-VAC $300.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES X 147799 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE,INC. $1.241.50 RECYCLABLE MATERIAL REMOVAL �_. 147800 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. $60.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL W 147801 ASSOCIATED CONCRETE PRODUCTS $174.56 BUILDING MATERIALS -1 147802 AMSA $1.000.00 WORKSHOP REGISTRATION-TECHNICAL C, 147803 ATKINSON FLUID POWER $451.BB HYDRAULIC MOTOR 1 147804 BKK LANDFILL $5,027.31 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91 ~ 147805 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $677.75 BATTERIES 147506 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $10,570.16 LAB SUPPLIES 147807 BEACH PAVING,INC. $500.00 PAVING REPAIRS 147808 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $495.40 TRUCK WASH TICKETS 147809 BETA MONITORS INTERNATIONAL $190.62 MONITOR REPAIRS 147810 BIO-GRO DIVISION $41,OB4.90 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.4-2G95 147811 BIOMERIEUX VTTEK,INC. $558.00 LAB SUPPLIES 147812 BIOSPHERICAL INSTRUMENTS,INC. $13300 LAB SUPPLIES 147813 BLACK BOX CORP. $157.01 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS 147814 BLUE RIBBON,INC. $4.318.00 FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES 1471HS BOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE $1,570.99 TRUCK REPAIRS 147816 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $892.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 147817 BUDGET JANITORIAL $6,660.00 JANITORIAL SERVICES M.O. 1-12-94 147818 THE BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFFAIRS $1.466.00 SUBSCRIPTION ' 147819 BUSH&ASSOCIATES,INC. $14,024.00 SURVEYING SERVICES,M.0.6.8-94 147820 BUSINESS PUBLISHERS,INC. $351.00 SUBSCRIPTION 147821 CLEAN WATER REPORT $275.54 PUBLICATION 147822 C.L.TECHNOLOGY $1,440.00 GAS ANALYSIS SERVICES 147823 CS COMPANY $2.250.16 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 147824 CALIFORNIA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE $382.55 TRAINING REGISTRATION-TECHNICAL 147825 CALIFORNIA WATER AWARENESS $250.00 MEMBERSHIP FEES 147826 CAPITAL WESTWARD CORP. $137.88 MECHANICAL PARTS 147827 CAREER TRACK SEMINARS $98.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION-TECHNICAL FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10/27/95 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBERAP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 11/01/95 POSTING DATE 11/01/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 147828 JOHN CAROL-0 ENGINEERS $40,981.94 ENGINEERING SERVICES Pt-38,J-33-2 147829 CENTURY PAINT $229.59 PAINT SUPPLIES 147830 CENTURY SAFETY INST.&SUPPLY $2.665.75 SAFETY SUPPLIES 147831 CERTEX ELECTRONICS,INC. $1,153.94 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS 147832 CERTIFIED TRANSPORTATION $250.25 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 147033 CHEM SEARCH $1.651.98 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 147834 COLD SAWS OF AMERICA,INC. $51.41 TOOLS 147835 COMPETENT CARE,INC. $320.00 MEDICAL RESPONSE SERVICES 147836 COMPUSERVE $288.20 COMPUTER SERVICES 147837 CONNELL GM PARTS/DIV. $130.11 TRUCK PARTS 147838 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $9.717.19 ELECTRIC PARTS 147839 CONSUMER PIPE $208.41 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 147840 CONSUMER TERMITE CONTROL,INC. $1,150.00 PEST CONTROL SERVICES 147841 CONTINENTAL EQUIP&SUPPLY $1.476.39 HARDWARE 147842 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS O C $310.00 CONSULTING SERVICES M.O.8-11.93 147843 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $3,751.95 ENGINE PARTS TD 147844 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $5,078.22 ELECTRIC PARTS 2 147845 CUMMINS CAL PACIFIC,INC. $209.85 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 147846 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $99.76 WASTE DISPOSAL FEES 100 147847 MARCEL DEKKER,INC. $168.48 PUBUCATION 147848 DELL COMPUTER CORP. $40,297.66 COMPUTER HARDWARE 147849 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIF. $32.652.06 DENTAL INSURANCE PLAN M.0.1-12-94 f"t 147850 DEZURICK AND/OR CS CO. $3,843.41 VALVES IV 147851 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. E4,168.53 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 147852 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $7.092.39 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 147853 DUHIG&CO.,INC. $84.62 VALVES 147854 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $412.57 PAINT SUPPLIES 147855 EC&M SEMINARS $295.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION-TECHNICAL 147866 ESP NORTH 363.95 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 147857 EASTMAN,INC. $394.79 OFFICE SUPPLIES 147858 EBERHARD EQUIPMENT $266.05 TRUCK PARTS 147859 ECOANALYSIS,INC. $4.901.50 CONSULTING SERVICES 147860 EDWARDS HIGH VACUUM INTER. $634.21 LAB SUPPLIES 147561 ELSEVIER SCIENCE PUBLISHING $550.00 SUBSCRIPTION 147662 EMED $386.30 ELECTRIC PARTS 147863 EMERGENCY MGMT NETWORK $1,230.00 CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING 147864 ENCHANTER,INC. $4,900.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.524=95 147865 ESSCO PUMPS AND CONTROLS $554.63 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 147866 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $867.70 LAB SERVICES 147867 FLUID TECH.SALES $815.92 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 147868 FMC CORPORATION $67,99360 HYDROGEN PEROXIDE M.O.9.14-M 147869 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $19.986.37 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10.9.91 147870 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $1,224.70 AIR FREIGHT 147671 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $2.087.50 LAB SUPPLIES 147572 FISIONS INSTRUMENTS $1,286.75 LAB SUPPLIES 147673 CLIFFORD A FORKERT $4.405.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-8-95 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1=7195 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 11/01/95 POSTING DATE 11/01/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 147874 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $141.07 PHOTO SUPPLIES 147875 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $223.09 PAINT SUPPLIES 147876 FRIGIDARE COMMERCIAL PROD. $240.30 ELECTRIC PARTS 147877 FRY'S ELECTRONICS $3,655.85 ELECTRONIC&COMPUTER SUPPLIES 147878 GST, INC. $9,087.26 OFFICE SUPPLIES 147879 GAMMA PLASTICS $787.57 OPERATING SUPPLIES 147880 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $112.06 CHEMICALS 147881 GAINES ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $4,148.37 ELECTRIC PARTS 147882 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY OO. $1,473.84 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 147883 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $6,747.77 TELEPHONE SERVICES 147884 GIERLICH-MITCHELL,INC. $13,893.59 VALVES 147885 GILLESPIE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $13,483.76 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 147806 WIN GRAINGER,INC. $479.58 ELECTRIC PARTS 147887 GRASSY S.T.I. $3,874.55 ENGINE PARTS 1478BB GRAYBAR ELECTRIC WHOLESALE $250.26 COMMUNICATIONS SUPPLIES 147889 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $749.62 PRINTING m 147890 DOA CONSULTANTS $13,799.34 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.8-23-95&M.O.6.8-94 X 147891 DR.ROGER H.GREEN $5,405.36 OCEAN MONITORING 147892 HR EFFECTIVENESS,INC. $495.00 PUBLICATION w 147893 HB TYPE&GRAPHICS $2.003.88 PRINTING 147894 HARBOUR ENGINEERING $12.985.56 PUMP PARTS 147895 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $143.49 PLUMBING SUPPLIES n 147896 HATCH&KIRK,INC. $607.00 FILTERS W 147897 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS $2.210.00 CONTAINER RENTALS 147898 HAWKINS ASSOCIATES $777.23 LAB SUPPLIES 147899 PL HAWN CO,INO $120.25 FILTERS 147900 HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT $2.083.33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN. 147901 HILTI.INC. $2.576.94 TOOLS 147902 DR,DAVID E.HINTON $1,219.00 OCEAN MONITORING 147903 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $533.60 PAINT SUPPLIES 147904 HYDROTEX 52,981.09 MECHANICAL PARTS 147905 IPCO SAFETY $1,121.70 SAFETY SUPPLIES 147906 IMAGING PLUS,INC. $743.72 OFFICE SUPPLIES 147907 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $79.572.27 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11-18.92 147008 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $509.31 CONNECTORS 14780E INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS E305AS BATTERIES 147910 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $67.68 WATER USE 147911 J.D.I.TECHNOLOGIES,INC. $76.46 PRINTING SUPPLIES 147912 AT COMPUTER SOURCE,INC. $1,675.52 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 147913 JAMISON ENGINEERING,INC. $16,861.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 147914 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY. $1.013.04 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 147915 JAYS CATERING $186.46 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE 147916 JOHNSON CONTROLS $1.950.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION-TECHNICAL 147917 KALLEEN'S COMPUTER PRODUCTS $975.80 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 147916 FRANCES L KALUZNY 51,380.D0 HUMAN RESOURCES CONSULTING 147919 KEYE PRODUCTIVITY CENTER $139.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION-TECHNICAL FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10127195 PAGE 4 ' REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 11/01/95 POSTING DATE 11/01/95 WARRANTNO. VENDOR AMOUNT 147920 KING BEARING,INC. $1,815.44 MACHINE SUPPLIES 147921 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $185.44 SAFETY SUPPLIES 147922 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $3.412.31 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICE 147923 THE LANE COMPANY $1.535.00 - MECHANICAL REPAIRS 147924 LEE B RO CONSULTING ENGR. $4,576.45 ENGINEERING SERVICES Pt-3&5 147925 MDT BIOLOGIC COMPANY $935.00 LAB SUPPLIES 147926 MEC ANALYTICAL SYSTEMS,INC. $26.484.00 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 147927 MPS $94.68 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 147926 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS,INC. $1.354.57 TOOLS 147929 MANTEK S596.31 GROUNDSKEEPING SUPPLIES 147930 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $808,275.00 CONSTRUCTION P242.2 147931 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $261.64 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 147932 MASONELIAN N.AMER OPERATIONS $58.72 INSTRUMENT 147933 MATT-CHLOR,INC. $605.35 FERRIC CHLORIDE SUPPLIES 147934 MCLEAN MIDWEST $242.20 ELECTRIC PARTS 147936 MEDUN CONTROLS CO. $337.27 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES m 147936 MIDWAY MFG.B MACHINING $2,015.22 MECHANICAL REPAIRS X 147937 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3,092.32 UNIFORM RENTALS = 147938 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO. $465.00 ELECTRIC PARTS 147939 MONITOR LABS $120.68 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 147940 MORELAND B ASSOCIATES $7.811.50 AUDITING SERVICES M.O.3.8-96 147941 MOTOROLA CELLULAR $367.95 CELLULAR TELEPHONE PARTS (il 147942 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $1.199.76 PLUMBING SUPPLIES r 147943 NEW HORIZONS COMPUTER CENTERS,INC. $4.200.00 SOFTWARE TRAINING CLASSES 147944 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $77.04 WATER USE 147946 OI CORPORATION $213.97 LAB SUPPLIES 147946 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $2.431.35 OFFICE SUPPLIES 147947 ON TECHNOLOGY $2,900.50 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 147948 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO. $2,255,31 CHEMICALS 147949 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $1,689.13 ELECTRIC PARTS 147950 ORANGE COURIER $96.60 COURIER SERVICES 147951 ORANGE VALVE 8 FITTING CO. $5.013.75 FITTINGS 147952 ORITEX CORP. $1,459.58 MECHANICAL PARTS 147953 OSCARS LOCK B SAFE $64.35 LOCK REPAIRS 147954 OXYGEN SERVICE $1,323.03 SPECIALTY GASES 147955 COUNTY OF ORANGE $435.00 ADMINISTRATIVE FEES 147956 COUNTY OF ORANGE $5,882.92 SERVICE AGREEMENT 147957 COUNTY OF ORANGE $17.50 PERMITS 147958 COUNTY OF ORANGE $4.840.00 UNDERGROUND TANK FEES 147959 PSI $393.13 MECHANICAL PARTS 147960 PSSI $1,164.85 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION 147961 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $1,429.47 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 147962 PACIFIC PARTS $39,855.71 INSTRUMENT PARTS 147963 PACIFIC BELL $1.345.17 TELEPHONE SERVICES 147964 PALMIERI,TYLER,WIENER, $180.00 LEGAL SERVICES MQEb12-91 147965 PARAGON CABLE $73.56 CABLE SERVICES FUND NO 9199 - IT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGOATE 10/27/95 PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 11/01/95 POSTING DATE 11I01195 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 147966 PARALLAX EDUCATION $900.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION -MANAGEMENT 147967 PARKHOUSE TIRE,INC. $1.216.31 TIRES 147960 PARTS UNLIMITED $592.20 TRUCK PARTS 147950 PASCAL B LUDWIG $11,308.35 CONSTRUCTION P142 147970 PERFORMANCE SURVEY CORP. $1,421.82 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 147971 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $8.165.03 REIMS.PETTY CASH,TRAINING&TRAVEL 147972 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $97.461.90 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3�29-95 147973 PITNEY BOWES $303.05 SERVICE AGREEMENT 147974 POLYMETRICS,INC. $1.262.75 LASSUPPLIES 147975 POLYPURE,INC. $27,934.83 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-92 147976 POSITIVE FORMULATORS,INC. $197.20 CHEMICALS 147977 POSTAGE BY PHONE $5,000.00 POSTAGE 147978 POST CONSUMER PRODUCTS $460.50 COMMUNICATIONS SUPPLIES 147970 POWER SYSTEMS $68.16 MECHANICAL PARTS 147980 POWERTECH ENGINES,INC. $260.17 TRUCK PARTS 147981 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $176.00 ICE FOR SAMPLES m 147992 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE IND. $44.00 SOIL TESTING X 147983 PROMINENT FLUID CONTROL,INC. $799.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL s 147954 PUBLIC SECTOR EXCELLENCE $3.510.00 TRAINING CONSULTANT 147985 QUICKSTART TECHNOLOGIES $750.00 CONSULTING SERVICES �--� 147988 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $1.781.14 PUMP PARTS 147987 RB R INSTRUMENTS $169.59 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS (-1 147988 RED WING SHOES $1,380.05 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 147989 REISH MARINE STUDIES,INC. $1,140.00 OCEAN MONITORING 147990 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $1.452.49 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 147991 REVCO SCIENTIFIC $395.33 ELECTRIC PARTS 147992 SAWPA $300.00 SAWPA WATERSHED COMMITTEE 147993 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $37.96 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 1479M SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTL $112.788.48 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6-&94 147995 R.CRAIG SCOTT&ASSOC, $1.410.28 LEGAL SERVICES-PERSONNEL ISSUES 147996 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $1.231.53 SPECIALTY GASES 147997 SEA COAST DESIGNS $937.20 . OFFICE EQUIPMENT 147998 SERPENTLX CONVEYOR CORP. $2,626.31 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 147999 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $407.67 TOOLS 148600 SHURELUCK SALES $12,730.49 TOOLS/HARDWARE 148001 SKILL PATH SEMINARS $118.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION-MANAGEMENT 148002 SKILL PATH,INC. $445.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION-MANAGEMENT 148003 SKYPARKWALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $710.28 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 148004 SMITH-EMERY CO. $30.00 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-13-94 148005 THE SMITH GROUP $8,239.30 CONSULTING SERVICES 148006 SMITH PIPE&SUPPLY,INC. $90.23 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 148007 SOURCE COM $157.53 TRAINING MATERIALS 148008 SOUTH BAY FOUNDRY,INC. $12.202.69 MANHOLE FRAMES 148009 SO COAST AIR QUALITY $22,406.16 PERMIT FEES 148010 SOUTH COAST WATER $160.00 LAB SUPPLIES 148011 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. $111,987.93 POWER FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1027195 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 11/01/95 POSTING DATE 11/01195 WARRANTNO. VENDOR 148012 SO,CAL.GAS.CO. $21.007.53 NATURAL GAS 146013 SO CALIF.MARINE INSTITUTE $800.00 OCEAN MONITORING 148014 SPARLING INSTRUMENT CO,INC. $1,293.05 INSTRUMENT PARTS 148015 WESTALLOY,INC. $192.33 WELDING SUPPLIES 148016 SPECIALIZED PRODUCTS CO. $3,740.07 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 148017 SPECTRON&ASSOCIATES $221.75 LAB SERVICES 148018 SUMMIT STEEL $373.38 METAL 148019 SUNSETFORD $116.53 TRUCK PARTS 148020 SUNSET INDUSTRIAL PARTS $189.25 PUMP PARTS 148021 SUPELCO,INC. $85.00 LAB SUPPLIES 148022 SUPERB ONE-HOUR PHOTO $55.24 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 148023 SURVEYORS SERVICE CO. $85.90 TOOLS 148024 TCHASSOCIATES $3,965.63 LAB SUPPLIES 148025 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $160.49 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 148026 MIA TEGNER $2.750.00 OCEAN MONITORING CONSULTANT 148027 TELE-CELL,INC. $118A9 TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT rn X 148028 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $13.45 MECHANICAL PARTS = 148029 THORPE INSULATION $84.07 HARDWARE 148030 TONYS LOCK&SAFE SERVICE $561.09 LOCKS&KEYS to 148031 TREBOR ELECTRONICS $682.68 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES --1 148032 TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY,INC. $3.868.00 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.O.&11.94 148033 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $1,204.18 TRUCK PARTS 1 148034 TRUESDAIL LABS $1.541.46 LAB SERVICES 01 148036 JG TUCKER&SON.INC. $553.88 INSTRUMENT PARTS 148036 TUSTIN DODGE $31.28 TRUCK PARTS 145037 US RENTALS,INC. $640.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 148038 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $290.00 LAB SUPPLIES 140039 ULTRA WHEEL $7.536.21 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 148040 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT $227.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 148041 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $763.53 PARCEL SERVICES 148042 VWR SCIENTIFIC $7,009.23 LAB SUPPLIES 148043 VALIN CORPORATION $125.22 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 148044 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $302.76 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 148045 VARIAN ASSOCIATES,INC. $1.843.19 LAB SUPPLIES 148046 VENTURA CONSULTING GROUP $3.350.00 WORKSHOP REGISTRATION-TECHNICAL 148047 VILLAGE NURSERIES $138.57 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 148048 WACKENHUT CORP. $500.00 CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS 148049 CARL WARREN&CO. $630.96 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR 148050 WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION $117.50 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT COURSES 148051 WATERS CORPORATION $76,340.50 LAB EQUIPMENT 148052 K.H.WATTS CO. $645.47 ELECTRIC PARTS - 148053 WAKIE $60A3 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 148054 WAYNE ELECTRIC $405.94 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS 146055 WEATHER AND WIND INSTRUMENT $475.32 SAFETY SUPPLIES 148056 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $23,619.69 CAUSTIC SODA M.O.8.23-95 148057 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $648.48 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10/27/95 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 11/01/95 POSTING DATE 11/O1M5 WARRANTNO. VENDOR 148058 JUDITH A.WILSON $99.75 REIMBURSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE 148059 WITEG $905.10 LAB SUPPLIES 148080 WOLFE AND ASSOCIATES,INC. $2,462.00 CONSULTING SERVICES-RFO 148061 ROURKE,WOODRUFF&SPRADLIN $69,434.01 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.2-19-92 148052 XEROX CORP. $15,475.35 COPIER LEASES TOTAL CLAIMS PAID I I101/95 92,380,708.32 SUMMARY AMOUNT #1 OPER FUND $120.00 #2 OPER FUND $13.586.52 #2 CAP FAC FUND $2,064.00 #3 OPER FUND $74,419.92 03 CAP FAC FUND $10.366.75 R1 #5OPERFUND $7,099.92 X #7 OPER FUND $23,656.79 #7 CAP FAC FUND $4,444.00 000 #11 OPER FUND $949.51 --4 411 CAP FAC FUND $324.00 914 OPER FUND $654.43 #14 CAP FAC FUND $372.50 V #5&6 OPER FUND $3,010.68 #5&6 CAP FAC FUND $3.224.00 96&7 OPER FUND $2.596.34 #7&14 OPER FUND $6,038.16 JT OPER FUND $933.965.66 CORP $1,048,966.91 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $46,644.44 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $198,213.79 $2,380,708.32 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE 1 Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2,1 hereby certify that the Notice and the Agenda for the Joint Boards of Directors meeting held on November 15, 1995,was duly posted for public inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on November 9, 1995, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 15th day of November 1995. &�0414 Penny Kyle, Secr ry dWeach of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14 of Orange County, California Posted: , 1995, P.M. By: Signature rweoocroswecwovac .G.rw STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, 1 hereby certify that the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 held on 19/E�—was duly posted for public inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on Ace-�^-'� � . 19y�. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this /J�* day of Penny Kyle, a re a of each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14 of Orange County, California B onw*27A