Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-10-25 b COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA October 20, 1995 p,al ssz-24, 1 41 NOTICE OF MEETING ,nnLnge.dd , r 1 PC,'Be.82] JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS Fcurown Vallty cA COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 92]2"12] NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 10644 treet etl over. OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 44 n Avenue Fountain Valley. 92]oB]O18t8 WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 25, 1995 - 7:30 P.M. DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES Mann?nr 108" Ellis Avenue Agenaes 0 Fountain Valley, California 92708 C1405 The Regular Meeting of the Joint Boards of Directors of County Brae aneBrea Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange Buena Park County, California, will be held at the above location, time and date. Cypress Fountain Valley Fullerton Nunringmn Beacn Irvine ✓� Le Habra Boar cret Le Palma Los Alamitos Newport Beach Orange Record: $en°And reel Boom m Tentatively-Scheduled Scheduled Uocoming Meetings Stanton r ad" STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday,October 25, 1995, Ville Park at 5:30 pm Yarba Linda county or orange OPERATIONS,MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE - Wednesday, November 1, 1995,at 5:30 pm Santee" Dlstnats Goan Mesa PLANNING,DESIGN AND - Thursday, November 2, 1995, at 5:00 pm, Garden Grove CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE at Plant No.2 Midway Gty AD HOC COMMITTEE RE SPACE - Thursday,November 2, 1995,immediately water Diarricts UTILIZATION STUDY following the Planning, Design and Irvine Rancb Construction Committee meeting FINANCE,ADMINISTRATIVE AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE - Wednesday, November 8, 1995, at 5:30 pm EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - Wednesday,November 8, 1995,at 7:00 pm, immediately following the Finance, Adminstrative and Human Resources Committee Meeting A Public Wastewater and Environmental Management Agency Committed to Protecting the Environment Smce 1954 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS .1 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 10SAA ELLS AVENUE vo 80.8121 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92RB910) 111091 JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES Executive Committee Meetings Joint Board Meetings October Oct 18, 1995 Oct 25, 1995 November Nov 9, 1995 Nov 15, 1995 December None Scheduled Dec 13, 1995 January Jan 17, 1996 Jan 24, 1996 February Feb 21, 1996 Feb 28, 1996 March Mar 20, 1996 Mar 27, 1996 April Apr 17, 1996 Apr 24, 1996 May May 15, 1996 May 22, 1996 June Jun 19, 1996 Jun 26, 1996 July Jul 17, 1996 Jul 24, 1996 August None Scheduled Aug 28, 1996 September Sep 18, 1996 Sep 25, 1996 October Oct 16, 1996 Oct 23, 1996 r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA October 19, 1995 phone: (714)962-2411 To the Chairman and Members maung address: of the Joint Boards of Directors P0.Box B127 Fadmin ven A Valley,c 9272BE C Subject: Board Letter 92 street Address: 10844 Ellis Avenue The following is an update on some of the things that are happening at the Districts. If you ..in au 92705.701E have u Y P 9 sin%Ame 1e questions on an of the items, lease give me a call. Tour of Plant No. 2 Mamyar For the directors who were unable to attend the tour in August,there will be another tour on Agencies Saturday,November 18. We will meet at 10:30 a.m.at Plant No. 1 for brunch,then board the bus for a tour of Plant No.2 that will last approximately 1-1/2 hours. Please call Clarice Marcin at 962-2411.extension 3001 to make a reservation. LNec Anaheim eras "Quick Charge" Electric Vehicle Corridor Communities Program Buena Perk cypress Attached is a memorandum dated September 27, 1995 on the AQMD's AS 2766"Quick Fountain Valley Charge"program. As noted,we do not intend to take a lead role but will cooperate with cities Fullerton Beech eech Humingron B in their efforts. rvine La Habra Le Palma General Counsel Opinion on Local Tax Referenda Los Alamitos Newport Beach Attached is an October 16, 1995 summary of the recent Supreme Court case involving local 9 Plecenua tax referenda. General Counsel's opinion is that: "The decision has no direct application to Santa Ana the Sanitation Districts." Seal Beech Stanton TuStln Vlle Park Reduction of Operations Department Overtime 10rba Linda count,of Bren r& Attached are copies of two memos on the reduction of overtime by Operations staff at both treatment plants. As you can see, progress on this issue is being made at both plants. sanitary olswaa FEMA Funds Coate Mesa Bard Attached is a copy of a letter supporting our application for approximately S435,000 in en crave FEMA/California Office of Emergency Services funds to repair damage caused b Midway city 9 Y P 9 Y unprecedented high influent wastewater flows last winter. We have been notified that our water Districts application has been -----'-' "........ "--••'-`--ome time to receive payment. We are Irvine Ranch also going to request armanent repairs to the ouffall. We will keep you posted on tl Is. A Public wastewater and Environmental Management Agency Committed to Protecting the Environment Since 7954 r Chairman and Members of the Joint Boards of Directors Page 2 October 19, 1995 Water Ouality Sampling Results in Huntington Beach September was the fifth consecutive month in which coliform levels in the northern portion of our surf zone monitoring area were of concern. In September,Station 33N had no occurrences greater than 230 MPN/100 ml-,Station 9N had one occurrence,and Station 39N had four occurrences over the 230 limit. The engineering firm of Camp Dresser and McKee, Inc. (CDM)continued its assistance in assessing the sewerage system at Boise Chico State Beach and the Sunset Beach Sanitary District. To date, CDM has: 1)obtained a copy of drawings for the Boise Chica State Beach sewerage system;2) completed a site visit to verify accuracy of drawings with regard to location of lift stations, manholes, pressurized and gravity portions of the system, capacity of holding tanks and frequency of pump activity from these holding tanks;3) recommended a dye type and calculated the amount of dye needed to perform a system leak test;4) calculated the travel time for the dye to reach the surf zone based on conductivity of the sand, fluid head and distance;5)identified the authorizations needed from State Parks Environmental Management Division for performing a dye test; and,6) followed up with the Sunset Beach Sanitary District's engineer about its abandoned ouffall at PCH and Warner. CDM's completed report is expected by October 20. Assuming authorization from the State Parks Environmental Management Division could be obtained by the end of October,the dye study could be performed early November. State of California Constitution Revision Commission Attached is a fax dated October 5, 1995 from CASA updating us on the activities of the Constitution Revision Commission's activities and notification of a series of hearings that have been scheduled to receive input regarding the Commission's recommendations on state governance, state budget,schools, and local governance and financing. New Employee Committees Two new employee committees,the Core Values Committee and the Training Advisory Group, have been formed. Interested employees completed applications and were selected based on a variety of criteria. Blake Anderson is overseeing the Core Values Committee,and they recently spent 1-12 days developing goals and objectives. Judy Wilson has oversight responsibility for the Training Advisory Group. A 1/2-day session is planned for the near future to commence the development of a comprehensive training program. Accident Frequency Rates At the October 4, 1995 OMITS Committee meeting,the Safety and Emergency Response Division reported the quarterly accident frequency rates. Lost Work Day cases, Severity(the number of lost work days),Total Injury(OSHA recordable),and Near Miss accidents were reported. Director Swan asked that staff also provide information on Vehicle Accidents. This information is attached. Chairman and Members of the Joint Boards of Directors Page 3 October 19, 1995 Orange County Operational Area Agreement The Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS)was established in 1992 by Senate Bill 1841 to provide a framework for responding to and managing emergencies and disasters involving multiple jurisdictions and/or agencies. The County is required to establish an Opeational Area,which consists of all the political subdivisions of the County,for emergency management by December 1, 1995. The cities and special districts of Orange County have been invited to participate in the Operational Area Agreement prepared by the Orange County Emergency Management Council. Districts'staff is currently reviewing the Agreement. This Agreement will be a starling point for the County, cities and special districts to develop a plan to coordinate,communicate, respond and recover from emergencies and disasters. During the next few weeks,you may hear more about the Operational Area Agreement from your respective city staffs. This issue will be included on the November Board meeting agenda. Clean Up of Plant No.2 During the August OMTS Committee tour of Plant No.2,the Directors expressed concern about the two boneyards and the surplus equipment storage area. The Districts'boneyard is located north of the drying beds along the Santa Ana River. This area has been cleaned up and staff is investigating the possibility of a berm to shield the boneyard from the bike trail on the river bank. On October 17. bids were received to remove the surplus equipment located between the Santa Ana River and the drying beds. This includes old internal combustion engines that were removed as part of the electrification of Plant No.2. The bids are being analyzed and an award should be made in the next week. The other boneyard is located at the southeast corner of the plant. This area is not a boneyard, but rather a staging area for the contractor working on the expansion of the secondary treatment facilities. Engineering is working with the contractor to make this area more presentable. Painting the Surge Towers At a recent OMTS Committee meeting, Joint Vice Chair Swan asked staff about painting the surge tower to improve their appearance. Staff contacted Dupont for assistance with putting together the specifications. Samples of the existing paint were sent to a lab,and the lab determined that the paint contained, among other things, excessive levels of cadmium, lead and zinc. These elements are considered hazardous and require special disposal methods,employee protective equipment when removing the paint,as well as environmental monitoring. The estimated cost to remove the paint because of the extraordinary measures required is estimated to be$45,000 per tower. The painting of the surge tower is included in a future project,Job No.J-34-1,which is slated to come to the Boards in January,assuming receipt of Coastal Commission approval in December. Because of the cost,potential risk, and the fact that the work is already included in another project,staff is recommending against painting the towers at this time. Chairman and Members of the Joint Boards of Directors Page 4 October 19, 1995 Strategic Plan Update Attached you will find a time line for the update of the Districts'Strategic Plan. To keep the Board informed along the way,and to have policy input at critical points in the plants development,we are recommending quarterly Board Workshops. These are shown in bold on the time line. This is a complex piece of work involving a number of special studies. Our schedule anticipates securing the EPA NPDES permit no later than September 1996. The permit will establish treatment and reclamation conditions which will need to be considered in projecting the Districts' long-term capital needs. Adoption,including certification of the EIR,is anticipated by January 1998. Also attached Is a summary of the elements of the new Strategic Plan including highlights of the 1995-96 program and estimated costs. Decrease in Chemical Prices Used at the Districts Industry forecasts point toward decreases in the most expensive three chemicals(ferric chloride, caustic soda and hydrogen peroxide) used to operate the treatment plants. These chemicals make up over 80% of the Districts budgeted chemical expenditure of$5.2 million. The ferric chloride bid award, approved by the Board last month,reflected a unit cost reduction that resulted in a bid of$600,000 under the budget estimate. Caustic soda prices are forecast to decrease 10 percent,and availability of hydrogen peroxide is increasing which could yield future unit cost decreases. New Lighting Energy Conservation Study with SCE Southern California Edison (SCE) and staff have begun a lighting conservation study of the two treatment plants. SCE provides free consulting studies with recommendations on haw to cost-effectively reduce electricity consumption in buildings,tunnels and treatment plant lighting. Southern California ENVEST Energy Conservation Study The Southern California Edison (SCE) ENVEST energy conservation study has started. SCE selected HDR Engineering, an environmental consultant,to do the feasibility study. A draft report is due from HDR on December 1, 1995,with completion about two weeks later. Staff is working with SCE to develop an agreement to secure the present phase of ENVEST funds with a means for the OMTS Committee to review the feasibility study recommendations prior to proceeding to the project design phase. The present phase of ENVEST funds that have up to a 20%subsidy for projects, ends December 31, 1995. Chairman and Members of the Joint Boards of Directors Page 5 October 19, 1995 New Lab Manager Nancy Wheatley, Director of Technical Services, has announced that Dr.Samuel Mowbray has accepted the position of Environmental Laboratory Manager effective October 23, 1995. Sam has over fifteen years'experience, most recently with IOLAB Corporation, a division of Johnson&Johnson,an ophthalmic medical products company specializing in devices and pharmaceuticals. He was most recently Senior Regulatory Affairs Administrator, and Manager of Toxicology and Research Services. Sam has a Ph.D.in Micro/Molecular Biology from UCLA, and held post-doctoral fellowships with ICN Nucleic Acid Research Institute-Biochemistry, and Brown University Department of Biological Sciences- Molecular Biology. He received his B.A. in Bacteriology from UCLA. We feel fortunate to have a person with these credentials,and look forward to his leadership. Change in Meeting Schedule for November As a final note,I want to remind you that the November meeting schedule has changed, as follows: OMITS Committee November 1 at 5:30 p.m. PDC Committee November 2 at 5 p.m. at Plant 2 Operations Center Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization Study November 2 following PDC Committee FAHR Committee November 8 at 5:30 p.m. Executive Committee November 8 at 7 p.m. Stewing Committee November 15 at 5:30 p.m. Joint Board November 15 at 7:30 p.m. Respectfully, Donald F. McIntyre / General Manager DFMjiIWt�w nwvrmeanng.Lmnozs0 Enclosures: Memo dated September 27, 1995 on"Quick Charge"Electric Vehicles Memo dated October 16, 1995 re Santa Clara County Local Transportation Authority v. Guardino (local tax referenda) Memos dated September 21 and 27, 1995 on reduction of overtime October 9, 1995 letter to FEMA re recovery of disaster-related expenses FAX from CASA dated October 5, 1995 Accident Frequency Rate Report Time Line for Strategic Plan Update Elements of Our Strategic Plan 9 u ro m September 27, 1995 MEMORANDUM TO: Blake P. Anderson Chief Operations Officer FROM: Edwin E. Hodges Director of Maintenance SUBJECT: "Quick Charge" Electric Vehicle Corridor Communities Program At Monday's Department Head meeting, we discussed the concept of participating in the AQMD's AB 2766 project for Electric Vehicles. I stated that I do not feel this program is as good a fit for us as the CNG project was. However, before we make the final determination, we need to make sure we all know the same amount of information. The following is the "Readers Digest' version of everything I know (on this subject): PROGRAM DESCRIPTION The goal of the "Quick Charge' Electric Vehicle (EV) Corridor Communities Program is to assist communities to prepare for electric vehicles by testing the consumer market for EVs and demonstrating the infrastructure, permitting process, and coordination that will be necessary for the smooth introduction of larger quantities of EVs. The EV Condor Communities Program supports the deployment of electric vehicles along designated corridors and within speck communities that have committed to this deployment to be "EV-readya by encouraging the lease/purchase of EVs, installation of a public charging infrastructure and adoption of"EV-friendly" ordinances and procedures. THE CORRIDORS Three corridors have been designated as the initial focal points for this project. 1. The "405" corridor, which begins in Sherman Oaks and ends in Mission Viejo. 2. The "10" corridor, which begins in Santa Monica and ends in Redlands. CSDOC 0 P.O.9a.9127 • Foun l a In Valley,CA 92728.8127 • (714(962 2411 Blake P. Anderson Page 2 of 4 September 27, 1995 3. The '215/91" corridor, which begins in Temecula/Riverside and ends in Gardena. SELECTION OF THE EV CORRIDOR COMMUNITIES To participate in the program, the general purpose local government must join together in a cluster of three or more contiguous jurisdictions or entities. This clustering will allow a charging infrastructure network to begin to grow. Additionally, to be an EV Corridor Community, the jurisdictions within the clusters must commit to certain activities that will support and facilitate the "Quick Charge" Program. These activities are classified as: minimum participation requirements, necessary for consideration as a designated participant in the EV Corridor Community Program; discretionary activities, which are those that are highly valued and weigh heavily in the consideration of the EV Corridor Community designation, These activities are left to the discretion of each specific jurisdiction. MINIMUM PARTICIPATION REQUIREMENTS • Streamline permit process to allow installation of electric vehicle infrastructure within 72 hours of vehicle purchase or lease. • Adopt Electric Vehicle National Electric Code Revision and Uniform Building Code Revision. • Train emergency response personnel (police, fire, etc.) • Develop a plan to require new residential and commercial development to be electric vehicle-ready. Match funding will be available for the following discretionary activities: • Develop a consortium-approach to the electric vehicle program, with participating general purpose local governments partnering with municipal utilities, and private and nonprofit entities such as major employers, universities, airports, and automobile dealerships. • Demonstration of innovation in encouraging electric vehicles, such as offering parking incentives or Rule 1501 incentives. • Lease/purchase vehicles for general purpose local government fleets. V I Blake P. Anderson Page 3 of 4 September 27, 1995 • Provide public education regarding such subjects as safety. Funding may be possible for the following other Discretionary Activities: • Provide municipal infrastructures at locations such as parking lots and Metrolink stations. • Provide free or preferential electric vehicle parking. • Allow a utility user tax exemption for electric vehicles. • Provide incentives, such as density bonuses and planning fee waivers, for developers who accommodate electric vehicle needs. • Strive for state and federal incentives, such as electric vehicle use of high- occupancy vehicle of high occupancy vehicle lanes or presumptive conformity with the California Environmental Quality Act for developments with electric vehicle support components. • Establish incentives for larger employers of fleet operators to install electric vehicle infrastructure. • Co-fund employer parking infrastructure, if it is accessible to the public. • Assist employers in applying for Rule 1501 equivalency. • Co-fund residential and commercial infrastructure. • Promote electric vehicle utilization to residents and large employers. • Conduct city fleet evaluation and assist employers with conducting fleet evaluation for alternative fuel vehicles. • Publicize electric vehicle efforts and activities. PROCESS FOR SELECTING THE EV CORRIDOR COMMUNITIES The Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) to the MSRC will be responsible for the initial review of the applications for participation in the EV Corridor Communities Program. Recommendations by the TAC will then be considered for approval by the MSRC. Blake P. Anderson Page 4 of 4 September 27, 1995 SCHEDULE Implementation of the Corridor Communities Program will consist of several steps. This is to assure coordination with the auto buy-down program, allow time for local coalition to be formed, and to assure availability of necessary infrastructure. 1. October 1995 Program announcement: Information about the proposed program sent to all South Coast cities and counties to generate interest and enthusiasm in participating as the EV Corridor Communities program. 2. December 1995/January 1996 Applications for EV Corridor Community designation released. RFP for funding for discretionary projects released. Project manager works with interested cities and counties, COG's, multi-jurisdictional interests, and others to provide additional information and to help form coalitions. 3. March 1996 (This may get moved up to February) Applications and response to RFP due. Review by TAC begins. MSRC action scheduled. 4. April 1996 Cities designated by the MSRC. 5. May 1996 MSRC action on Discretionary Project applications. Based upon this information, it seems to me that If we should choose to participate in this program, our role would be in support of one of our member cities and not as the lead agency. I would, however, be interested in getting your views on this subject. EEH:cm R:IWPDOCWMEH WLT.FUEUFVBPA c: D. McIntyre COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS W ORANGE COUNTY,CATIFORNIA 10 E 8AVENUE P.O.eOX e19 FOUMAIN VALLEY,CAUFORNIA 9272"19 September28, 1995 (714)9 -2411 MEMORANDUM TO: Plant No. 1 Opara ons Staff I FROM: John Finias , Chief Operator t SUBJECT: Overtime After reading a memorandum from Doug Cook on Plant No. 2 overtime, I made a similar review for the same time period. I am delighted to report that Plant No. 1 also had a significant reduction of overtime for the first eight months of the calendar year 1995. These reductions were accomplished with staffing below authorized levels. The efforts and creativity at all levels of the operations staff made this possible and I want to extend my thanks for your cooperation. In the first eight months of 1994 (January-August) Plant No. 1 averaged 116 hours of overtime due to holidays (holiday overtime is the minimum staffing required to maintain plant operations on a holiday) and 474 hours per month of regular overtime (regular overtime is the combined total of overtime generated due to scheduled and unscheduled personal leave, comp. time, training,jury duty, etc.). For the same period in 1995, holiday overtime averaged 107 hours per month and regular overtime averaged 252 hours per month. This is a reduction of 8% in holiday overtime and a 47% reduction for regular overtime for the eight months. JPF:cf RAWPD0CU/80UPFW9 96.RJ0 Attachment c: Don McIntyre Black Anderson Bob Ooten COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CAUFORNIA September21, 1995 t� on waetn wurrraH vaur,'.wiwmaa�rzeatn ntneazant MEMORANDUM TO: Plant 2 Operations Staff FROM: Doug Cook Chief Operator SUBJECT: Overtime I want to commend and thank the Plant 2 Operations Staff for their efforts in minimizing overtime at Plant 2. From January 1994 through August 1994, an average of 499 hours per month of regular overtime and an additional 153 hours per month of holiday overtime was issued. For the same period in 1995, regular overtime dropped to an average of 182 hours per month and holiday overtime dropped to an average of 126 hours per month. This was a 63% decrease in regular overtime and a 17% decrease in holiday overtime. This decrease took place despite a reduction in Plant 2 Operations Staff. The reason for the success of this effort is your active participation in working with your supervisor to schedule your time off so as to minimize it' s affect on your respective shifts and your willingness to work at lower minimum staffing levels. This is exactly the type of thing that will allow us to run this facility at lower costs and greater economy. Once again, I want to congratulate the Plant 2 Operations Staff for their effort in reducing overall Districts' cost. DC:dm R:VAEMOStOCOVIME.W PO C: B. Anderson R. Dolan Plant 2 Supervisors 1BAIS/95 12:55:38 -> 7149GM56 Donald llclntw� Page 001 OCT-05-95 THU 10:54 P. 01 CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION o/ SANITATION AGENCIES 926L6ame6u:ie140e 6acreaa:Nq GA9a614 T (916)446-NO-FAM(916)4484MB d DATE: October 5, 1995 TO: CASA Member Ageodn FROM: Mike Dillon&Bobbi Larson SUBJECT: CONSTI'I MON REVISION COMMISSION-UPDATE Some of you may have seen a recent newsletter article indicating that the California Constitution Revision Commission is proposing to eliminate special districts. As you know, CASA has been monitoring the Commission's activities closely, and yesterday we met with Executive Director Fred Silva. Ford told us that the local government piece of the preliminary report to the Legislature is still being drafted, but it will not call for elimination of special districts across the board The Commission's theme, according to Fred, has been to eliminate institutional barriers to load governance and allow organizational decisions to be nude a the local level via local community charters. The chatter concept is still being developed, but is not intended to be imposed upon otlicr local agencies by the county(ward of supervisors. The idea is for the local agencies within each county to get together and come up with a charter that specifies which services will be provided by which local agencies. These diartm would also include new 'home rule' powers, including nosing authority and the power to allocate sales and property tax revenues among local agencies. The proposal will also include an initiative provision allowing eitiuns to re,writc a community charter and place it on the ballot The Commission will hold a series of hearings to receive input regarding its recommendations can state governance, state budget, schools, and local govcmance and financing. The htarngs are scheduled as follows: San Francisco: October 14 San Diego: November 3 Long Beack: November 30 Sacramento: December 7 There will also be a series of video confermoes at designated locations around the star:(audit as community colleges and libraries) during November and early December. The Commission plays to submit its final report to the Legislature in late January or early February, followed closely by the introduction of a single bill which will include all the proposalt. The Commission apparently hopes to have a spociai legislative policy committee established to consider the package of reforms We will continue to bring you updates as the Commission's local government Mfganiration proposals evolve. A�.iDf " COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA F October 9, 1995 b 9822 I` 41 k °p14j 1 Marc A. Johnson, P.E. ailing address: Federal Emergency Management Agency P.O.Bo.8 127 i;Eo.meh.veney,ON 297 Marengo Avenue 8272"127 Pasadena, California 91101 ::..street address: ilrFouielo lvena cn SUBJECT: Disaster Number: FEMA-1044-DR 9270&7018 Project Application Number: 059-91108 Subgrantee: County Sanitation Districts of Orange County ~._ gemees The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (Districts) provide".;.. M. . • wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal services for more than two million people in metropolitan Orange County. The Districts are comprised :' an.halm of nine independent sanitation districts that operate through a Joint Powers Brea Agreement with two common wastewater treatment plants and one common 1 Baena Par` ocean disposal system. The Districts treat approximately 235 million Cypress ��•Fountain Vey gallons per day of wastewater that is discharged five miles off the coast of Fullerton Huntington Beach Huntington Beach at a depth of 200 feet. Beach 9 P Irvine Le Habra L e Palma During FEMA-1044-DR, the Joint Works Treatment Plants and Disposal Los Alamitos Facilities received unprecedented high influent wastewater flows, which New ort Beach Crangs damaged the Districts' Joint Ocean Outfall Treated Wastewater Disposal Record. System and caused other disaster-related problems. As a result, the Sense Ana Seel Beach Districts incurred significant costs to date and will incur additional costs in B°"w" the future. Tusun Vids Park Moro. Lind. Pursuant to our meeting on September 25, 1995, the following information County of Orange is provided to facilitate the completion of the Districts' Disaster Survey Reports: Said., Districts Coats Mese 1. Damage to the Ocean Ouffall (Outfall) was suspected due to a Garden Grow drop in pumping pressures. The Ouffall was investigated and it midway city P P 9 P 9 was found that the end-gate had opened, which is required Water Dleu;tte under the Districts' National Pollution Discharge Elimination /here Ranch System (NPDES) permit to be closed at all times. Temporary repairs were completed as quickly as possible. The cost of this temporary work was $131,110.87 (enclosure 1). A Public Westewater and Environmental Management Agency Con m rated to Protecung the Environment Since 1354 Marc A. Johnson, P.E. Page 2 of 3 October 9, 1995 2. After it was determined that the end-gate had suffered damage, a permanent repair investigation was initiated. In addition, to ensure the integrity of the line, plans are being prepared for an investigation of the interior of the Outfall. The cost of the permanent repairs, as well as, the cost of the interior investigation of the Outfall have not yet been determined. 3. Additional process chemicals were used to protect human health and the environment, as a result of the high flow and damage incurred to the Outfall. The cost of the additional chemicals was $64,339.43 (enclosure 2). 4. Damage to the pumps and motors of the Ocean Outfall Booster Station was suspected due to loud noise, vibration, and overheating during peak pumping periods. The Districts retained a consultant to investigate the condition of the pumps and motors (enclosure 3). OES/FEMA have a copy of the engineering reports. The cost of this work was approximately $69,400. A detailed cost breakdown and supporting documentation will follow during the week of October 16, 1995. 5. Excess influent wastewater flow increased the Districts' energy usage considerably. The Districts spent $148,607.88 for additional energy (enclosure 4). 6. Additional staff was required to maintain and repair Districts' facilities during the disaster. Approximately $21,661.18 was spent on labor for storm-related activities (enclosure 5). The Districts have incurred costs of approximately $435,119.36, not including permanent repairs to the Outfall, as a result of FEMA-1044-DR. The Outfall is one of the most critical components of the Districts' facilities. It is highly regulated and repairs must be completed under strict guidelines and NPDES permit requirements. The Districts intend to file a supplement for the additional cost of the permanent repairs to the Outfall. Marc A. Johnson, P.E. Page 3 of 3 October 9, 1995 If you have any questions or require additional information regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me at (714) 962-2411 extension 2143.E Daniel Tunnicliff Safety and Emergency Response Engineer DET:dt g:\ry%NunnidAmac\1044_oes.N Enclosures c: Blake Anderson w/o enclosures Judy Wilson w/o enclosures Terri Josway w/o enclosures Near Miss Accidents 25 Cn ,. c 20 a) v 15 01993 Q 1994 O b W 1995 `m 10 6 b LY 4 4 y 4 :3 5 6 Z s ' 0 1 st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr Total Quarter By Calendar Year A near miss accident is an accident that does not result in an injury. By investigating near miss accidents, unsafe acts and/or unsafe conditions can be corrected. Severity Rate Lost Work Days and Restricted Work Days 200 Industry Average ee 163 150 01993 E:1 1994 E M 1995 100 L- Mindustry a) />/�� Average //(�D d0 v' 9B 50 s �+ 0 1 st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr Total Quarter By Calendar Year Severity Rate = Number of Lost Work Days + Restricted Days x 200.000 Number of Manhours The severity rate provides a measurement of the seriousness of the lost work day causes. Vehicle Accidents 8 aD 6 6 5 - 01993 U a;• Q 4 1994 O M 1995 F T•, a� 3 � 2 Hy � FF o § o 0 1 st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr Total Quarter By Calendar Year Lost Work Day Case Frequency Rates 1 Industry Average e 8 _ N 01993 El a 6 1994 U M 1995 a a a Industry 4 Average 2 2 2 lL 2 - 0 - 1 st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr Total Quarter By Calendar Year LWDC = Number of Lost Work Day Cases x 200,000 Frequency Rate Number of Manhours The lost work day case frequency rate includes all accidents where the employee is unable to work or unable to perform all functions of their job. OSHA Total Injury Frequency Rates Lost Work Day Cases and Other Medical Treatment Cases 20 Industry Average is 15 +a 01993 c Ir 01994 >' M 1995 a a C 10 a e,; a a) M Industry :3 5 5J Average l 5 5 2 0 1T 1 st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr Total Quarter By Calendar Year Total Injury = Number of Injuries x 200.000 Frequency Rate Number of Manhours The total injury frequency rate includes all accidents which are recorded on the OSHA 200 log. TIME LINE BOARD INVOLVEMENT/CONSULTANT DEADLINES STRATEGIC PLAN November 1995 Board Action on SOO and RFP for three projects: Ocean outfall, Peak Hydraulic Flow Study and Financial Analysis December 1995 Staff receives qualification and completes evaluation. January 1996 Board Workshop - Overview of Three Project Elements and Time Line for Strategic Plan. Staff mails Ri to qualified firms. February 1996 Staff receives RFPs and evaluates proposals. March 1996 OMITS and PDC Committees take action to award contracts for three projects. April 1996 Board Workshop - Overview of Key Policy Issues for Updated Strategic Plan. June 1996 Consultant submits draft report on ocean outfall. July 1996 Board Workshop - Ocean Outfall - Considerations of Options. August 1996 Completion of Plans and Specs for outfall gate repairs. September 1996 Secure permit from EPA. Board action on SOO and RFP on Treatment and Reuse Study. Initiate CEOA compliance on ocean ouffall rehab. Consultant submits demographic data, land use projections. October 1996 Board Workshop - Forecasts - Demographic Analysis and Its Implications - What's changed since 19897 November 1996 Board action to award contract on Treatment and Reuse Study based on 9/96 permit conditions. Consultant submits draft report with fee categories, relationship amounts. December 1996 Begin preparation of draft report on Treatment and Reuse Study. Time Line Page 2 October 11, 1995 January 1997 Board Workshop - Capital Facilities Charges - Financial Analysis. February 1997 Complete CEQA compliance on ocean outfall. March 1997 Begin preparation of Program EIR for Stategic Plan. April 1997 Board Workshop - Participating the Public - Outreach Strategies for Communications - Review Decision Model. Consultant completes Hydraulic Analysis. Consultant completes Draft Master Plans on Flow, MI, Peaking future production techniques and trunk sewer analysis. Consultant completes Final report on sanitary service charge, capital facilities, connection charge and excess capacity charge. June 1997 Board Workshop - Presentation on Final Draft of Peak Hydraulic Discharge; Launching Public Outreach Plan. Jul - Dec 1997 Outreach - Public discussion. August 1997 Circulate draft EIR on Strategic Plan. Complete draft report on Treatment and Reuse. September 1997 Board Workshop - Update on Public Dialogue Issues Requiring Resolution and Direction. Hold public hearing on draft EIR. November 1997 Complete Strategic Plan Document. December 1997 Complete Final EIR January 1998 Board adoption of Strategic Plan; Certification of EIR NOTE: This timeline is based on assumption that an approved permit is secured by September 1996. The permit will provide guidance on Treatment and Reuse thresholds which will be critical factors in financial analysis and environmental evaluation. JAW:cmc JAWP'�OG1GMVMLSaMTYWL E ELEMENTS OF OUR STRATEGIC PLAN ■ Project land use and population. ■ Perform flow projections. ■ Determine Inflow/Infiltration (I & 1) contributions. ■ Determine collection system requirements. ■ Analyze alternate peak flow management options. ■ Determine facility sizing requirements for peak flows. TREATMENT/REUSE REQUIREMENTS p Project ocean quality objectives -permit conditions O Project water reclamation needs, process requirements and space needed. O Determine treatment process requirements, associated costs and plant layout alternatives through 2050. O Recommend long term management plan for biosolids. < f SUPPORT SUBJECTS, 0 Estimate staff and space requirements for administrative, operations and maintenance functions. 0 Review source control, ocean monitoring and laboratory needs. 0 Estimate O & M and capital needs and recommend a financial plan. 0 Describe programmatic options and asset management opportunities. 1of4 STRATEGIC PLAN: NEAR TERM Highlights of the 1995-96 Program PROJECT NO. 1 : .. .REHABILITATION OF OUTFACES p Investigate the interior condition of our 120-inch, five (5) mile operating outfall. Clean the interior of the 120-inch outfall. 0 Repair both outfalls, open plugged ports, etc. El Analyze option to intentionally open 120-inch outfall end gate during peak flows, discuss with Regulators. 0 Make permanent repair to 120-inch outfall end gate (gate was damaged during January 1995 storms) PROJECT NO. 2: MANAGEMENT OF PEAK HYDRAULIG DISCHARGE ; p Develop land use and population data for determination of daily flows, peak flows and Collection System needs. Land use data to be shared with financial study (below). 9 Perform I & I study. IS Determine if peak flows can be economically reduced. 0 Review methods to retard peak flows. 0 Analyze peak flow ocean discharge options. V Conduct outfall alternative decision model with Directors, Regulators and other interested citizens and environmental groups. 2 of 4 STRATEGIC PLAN: NEAR TERM Highlights of the 1995-96 Program PROJECT NO. 3: : . . DETERMINATION OF FINANCIAL CHARGES With land use data developed from Project No. 2, develop multiple land use categories that are tied to the Orange County Tax Collector's base. O Review short term financial needs and compare to existing Capital Facilities Connection Charge; Excess Capacity Charge; and annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charge. 0 Evaluate near term charge alternatives. E3 Review draft information with stakeholders and make final recommendations to Directors. 0 Note: As a part of Project No. 4, as long term facility needs are redefined, this issue will be revisited for developing a long term financial charge program. 3 of 4 1 � STRATEGIC PLAN Estimated Costs ITEM PROJECT MASTER PLAN COST COST 1995-96 PROGRAM - NEAR TERM ■ PROJECT NO. 1: Rehabilitate Existing Ocean Outfalls .................. $ 630,000 ■ PROJECT NO. 2: Management of Peak Hydraulic Discharge ..............................................$ 1,150,000 ■ PROJECT NO. 3: Financial Analysis ........................................................ $ 390,000 FUTURE PROGRAMS ■ PROJECT NO. 4: Treatment, Reuse ................................................................................................. $ 500,000 Support/Staffing .................................................................................................. $ 350,000 CEQA Compliance................................................................................................. $ 500,000 Public Participation................................................................................................ $ 250,000 TOTAL $ 2,750,000 (For comparison purposes, the 1989 Master Plan cost approximately$4,500,000) 4 of 4 Y y AGENDA JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 REGULAR MEETING OCTOBER 25, 1995 -7:30 P.M. r" 18111 �aa w- i In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2f VII.. agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the Districts'Administrative Offices nollesg 1�'al�.y<< than'72 hours.prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to V° each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. 1 .In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to he submitted to the ad' [Q5 lip for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 549542(b) as an emergency Item or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the ',9 tt attention of the Districts subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a � Iupplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date 4� 'i91Rk6 (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll call (3) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders) (4) Appointment of Chair pro tem, if necessary (5) Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Boards on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot have action taken by the Boards of Directors except as authorized by Section 54954.2(b). 10/25/95 V= (6) The Joint Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports 0 on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. (a) Report of Joint Chair, consideration of Resolutions or commendations, presentations and awards (b) Report of General Manager (c) Report of General Counsel (7) EACH DISTRICT If no corrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair: District 1 - September 27, 1995 regular District 2 - September 27, 1995 regular District 3 - September 27, 1995 regular District 5 - September 27, 1995 regular District 6 - September 27, 1995 regular District 7 - September 27, 1995 regular District 11 - September 27, 1995 regular District 13 - September 27, 1995 regular District 14 - September 27, 1995 regular (8) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District.) 10/04/95 & 09/20/95 10/06/95 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $620,167.44 $798,567.03 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 560,310.76 461,765.16 Joint Working Capital Fund - 115,727.22 135,017.29 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 52,888.38 25,857.34 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 6,317.55 225.00 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 14,322.53 42,506.41 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 234,237.02 81,253.70 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 18,211.07 11,618.76 DISTRICT NO 6 - 1.232.01 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 7,325.96 62,003.57 DISTRICT NO, 11 - 336,183.65 15,861.88 DISTRICT NO. 13 - 47.18 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 14 - 1.952.52 48,450.83 DISTRICTS NOS 5 & 6 JOINT - 121,382.77 4,095.96 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 &7 JOINT - 0.00 2,930.72 DISTRICTS NOS 7 & 14 JOINT - 0.00 5 646 3.39 $2.090.326.06 $1,695,797.04 -2- 10/25/95 4 (9) CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEMS 9(a) THROUGH 9(c) All matters placed on the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or I further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be I enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent i i calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. .Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon ! recognition by the chair, stale their name, address and designate by letter the item to be i removed from the consent calendar. I 1 The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of the following actions relative to Purchase of Three Cab and Chassis with Crane Mounted Service Body, Specification No. V-008: (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter dated September 28, 1995, from Maurice J. Sopp Truck Center, apparent low bidder, requesting that they be allowed to withdraw their bid for said purchase due to a mathematical error and approving said request. (2) Consideration of motion receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding Purchase of Three Cab and Chassis with Crane Mounted Service Body, Specification No. V-008, to Mike McCarthy Buick & GMC Truck, for a total amount not to exceed $124,346.37, plus sales tax. -3- 10/25/95 (9) ALL DISTRICTS (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (b) Consideration of the following actions regarding the transportation and disposal of residual solids: (1) Consideration of motion approving and authorizing the General Manager to execute Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement with Falcon Disposal Services, Inc., for transportation of residual solids for disposal within a 40-mile radius, extending the agreement for a six-month period beginning October 30, 1995, at the existing contract unit price of$260.00 per load for grit and screening, and $12.08 per ton for sludge, in form approved by General Counsel (Estimated six-month cost is $100,000.00). (2) Consideration of motion approving and authorizing the General Manager to execute Amendment No. 4 to the Agreement with BKK Corporation for interim residual solids disposal, extending the agreement for a six-month period beginning October 30, 1995, at the existing contract unit price of$31.38 per ton for grit, screenings, and sludge, in form approved by General Counsel (Estimated six- month cost is $65,000.00). DISTRICT 1 (c) Consideration of motion approving Settlement Agreement with Alphanetics, Inc. and Francisco Lopez, for administrative penalties in the amount of$42,000.00 for wastewater discharge violations, in a form approved by General Counsel. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (10) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any -4- 10/25/95 (11) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Minutes of the Executive Committee (1) Receive and file draft Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization Study Committee Minutes for the meetings held on July 14, 1995 and September 13, 1995. (2) Receive and file draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on September 27, 1995. (3) Receive and file draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on October 4, 1995. (4) Receive and file draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on October 5, 1995. (5) Receive and file draft Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on October 11, 1995. (6) Receive and file draft Ad Hoc Committee re Landfill Acquisition Committee Minutes for the meeting held on October 18, 1995. (7) Receive and file draft Executive Committee Minutes for the meeting held on October 18, 1995. (b) Consideration of the following actions recommended by said committees: (1) OMTS95-043 Consideration of the following actions relative to the Professional Services Agreement with Communications Performance Group, Inc. for design of an Integrated Emergency Response Plan (Specification No. P-166): (a) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee certification of the final negotiated fee with Communications Performance Group, Inc. for said services. (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 95-104, approving said agreement with Communications Performance Group, Inc. for said services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor, including overhead, plus fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $125,000.00 for the 1995-96 fiscal year, and a total cost not to exceed $312,232.00. -5- [ITEM (11)(b) CONTINUED ON PAGE 6] 10/25/95 (11) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 5) (b) (2) OMTS95-045 Consideration of motion authorizing an increase in Districts' expenditures for in-house laboratory analyses supporting the Joint Ultraviolet Pilot Project with Orange County Water District, increasing the Districts' cost for direct labor and material for an additional amount of$17,000.00, increasing the total authorized amount from $40,000 to an amount not to exceed $57,000. (3) PDC95-31 Consideration of motion to approve, in concept, the Partnering Charter and the Value Engineering Clause to the contract with Margate Construction, Inc. for Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36-2. (4) OMTS95-041 Consideration of motion to approve, in concept, the construction of a Compressed Natural Gas Refueling Station, Job No. P1-51; authorizing staff to loan reserve funds in the 1995-96 budget to build the station; and directing staff to establish an enterprise report for future review. (5) FAHR95-25 Consideration of Resolution No. 95-105, repealing Resolution No. 95-54 Pertaining to Classification, Compensation, and Other Terms, Conditions, Rules and Regulations of Employment, reflecting changes occurring in legislation and labor law, and required insurance coverages. (6) FAHR95-38 Consideration of motion authorizing staff to solicit bids for a professional services agreement for the Financial Information System project for completion of Phase III, Selection Process for Hardware and Software; and Phase IV, Implementation and Acceptance of the Selected Hardware and Software Solutions. (7) FAHR95-40 Consideration of motion authorizing staff to negotiate Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 & 13 and County Sanitation District No. 14 for Purchase and Sale of Capacity Rights in Treatment, Disposal and Sewer Facilities, providing for District No. 14's annual flow to be based upon actual average flow per day for the four highest months, and providing capacity for higher winter month flows. (8) FAHR95.41 Consideration of motion to receive and file monthly investment report and staff report regarding performance monitoring of Pacific Investment Management Company. -6- [ITEM (11)(b) CONTINUED ON PAGE 7] 10/25/95 A- ' (11) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 6) (b) (9) FAHR95-42 Consideration of the following actions re Establishing Policy for Microcomputer Acquisitions: (a) Consideration of motion declaring a policy that all PC technology purchases be limited to the most recent list of Tier 1 and Tier 2 vendors as defined by The GartnerGroup, for both desktop computers and mobile computers. (b) Consideration of motion declaring a policy that all purchasing actions relating to the purchase of PC technology utilize the California Multiple Award Schedule (CMAS) contracts for the purchase of PC technology from among the Tier 1 and Tier 2 vendors as defined by GartnerGroup; and authorizing staff to compare CMAS pricing to choose the lowest priced Tier 1 and Tier 2 vendor's configuration applicable to the Districts' needs. (c) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Dell Computer for the Purchase of 60 Personal Computers and Monitors and Other Associated Components (Specification No. E-261)for a total amount not to exceed $208,900.00, plus sales tax. (10) FAHR95-43 Consideration of Resolution No. 95-106, authorizing the establishment of a Relief Operator bonus of$0.60 per hour for employees covered by the Operations and Maintenance Memorandum of Understanding. (12) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion, as requested by Director John Gullixson, that the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee study, review and make recommendations regarding the implementation of time clocks for Districts' staff. (13) ALL DISTRICTS Verbal report on status of the Strategic Plan -Assistant General Manager, Operations and Assistant General Manager, Administration. -7- 10/25/95 i (14) ALL DISTRICTS Update re proposed acquisition of County Solid Waste Management System, and consideration of the following actions: (a) Consideration of motion authorizing staff and consultants to conduct expanded Phase I Assessment Studies on moderate and high exposure landfill sites, to be done within the previously authorized amount of $100,000.00. (b) Consideration of motion authorizing consulting services for Phase II Assessment Study to determine landfill assets and liabilities for an amount not to exceed $100,000.00. (c) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a letter of interest to enter into negotiations for the purchase of the County of Orange Solid Waste Management System; and, authorizing an amount not to exceed $100,000.00 in nonrefundable option payments to be applied toward the purchase price. (15) ALL DISTRICTS Update concerning developments related to the County's Commingled Investment Pool. (16) ALL DISTRICTS I CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on .. I this agenda as a regular meeting of the Boards,the Chair may convene the i Boards in closed session to consider matters of pending or potential ligation,or personnel matters,pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9,54957 or 54957.6. a' of l Reports relating to(a)purchase and sale of real property;(b)matters of A. i pending or potential litigation;(c)employment actions or negotiations with employee representatives;or which are exempt from public disclosure under lri,.� i the California Public Records Act,may be reviewed by the Boards during a M.,I,I permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such... I time as final actions are taken by the Boards on any of these subjects the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. lit IFF i l • I (a) Convene in closed session, if necessary -8- [ITEM (16) CONTINUED ON PAGE 9] 10/25/95 (16) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 8) (b) (1) Confer with General Counsel re status of litigation, Louis Sangennano v. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. (2) Confer with General Counsel re status of litigation, County Sanitation District No. 3 v. United Technologies Corp., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 722816. (3) Confer with General Counsel re status of litigation, S. Serrantino v. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 737044. (4) Confer with Special Counsel re status of litigation, Lloyd T. Nitzen v. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Superior Court Case No. 712847. (c) Reconvene in regular session (d) Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session (17) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (18) ALL DISTRICTS Matters which a Director would like staff to report on at a subsequent meeting (19) ALL DISTRICTS Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff report (20) DISTRICT 1 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (21) OISTRICTI Consideration of motion to adjourn -9- 10/25/95 (22) DISTRICT2 Consideration of the following actions relative to Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-R1: (a) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing an addition of$7,398.80 to the contract with Colich Bros., Inc. dba Colich & Sons, for one item of additional work, and granting a time extension of 30 calendar days for completion of said additional work. (b) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 4 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a net deduction of$109,637.60 from the contract with Colich Bros., Inc. dba Colich & Sons. (c) Consideration of Resolution No. 95-107-2, accepting said contract, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement for a final total contract amount of$2,657,809.81 (original awarded contract amount of$2,482,762.00). (23) DISTRICT2 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (24) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn (25) DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (26) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn (27) DISTRICT 5 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (28) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn -10- 9 10/25/95 (29) DISTRICTS 6. 7 8 14 Consideration of the following actions relative to Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-1A: (a) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing an addition of$39,734.90 to the contract with Mladen Buntich Construction Co., Inc., for five items of additional work, and granting a time extension of 33 calendar days for completion of said additional work. (b) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 4 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing an addition of$209,090.78 to the contract with Mladen Buntich Construction Co., Inc., for nine items of additional work, and granting a time extension of 39 calendar days for completion of said additional work. (c) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 5 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a net addition of$36,059.00 to the contract with Mladen Buntich Construction Co., Inc. (d) Consideration of Resolution No. 95-108, accepting said contract as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement for a final total contract amount of$8,810,715.81 (original awarded contract amount of$8,278,963.00). (30) DISTRICT 6 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (31) DISTRICT Consideration of motion to adjourn (32) DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (33) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn (34) DISTRICT 11 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (35) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn _11_ 10/25/95 1 (36) DISTRICT 13 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (37) DISTRICT 13 Consideration of motion to adjourn (38) DISTRICT 14 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (39) DISTRICT 14 Consideration of motion to adjourn ,z i§ - ; vplaceitems on thegend-aor-Ihaf3egula111u ea ulg> ant' arclsDtredors shalCubmCt iCemso�e Board SeaeYary not lateiharfhaxlos bus7ness fi4 days pre caEing the Jana Board meeti997..a Board 8ecretarys�all Include an tYie agentla ll`items'sutimitted bj/'D'rectors,ttie Genei`al Ma-ager_ntl .,onerat nunsel GMS -�Irmatwmmuniat6cos y � t � k � board$eeretary i 'Penny Kyle.':. (714,982 24�1 R max( 3202$ ` ' Bebrelaly � Patnae k �(71i`-2'241��ex1.202g Rw _12_ JAwaooMeswc AOCT951A.1a COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 , 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES JOINT BOARD MEETING SEPTEMBER 27, 1995 �\oa0\gZRfCTS OF�9gG � c Z 1 7 v a ww A9oTFCl�N�iHE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 ROIL CALL `a A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County SanRetion Districts Nos. 1, 2. 3. 5, 6. 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on September 27, 1995, at 7:30 p.m.,in the Districts'Administra6vs Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the soli Was Called and the Sacroviry reported a quorum present for Disvictt Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 as follows: ACTNE ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO. 1: Pat McGuigan, Clair Ted R.Moreno _ James M. Ferryman,Clair pro tam 1 Arland Schater y Mark A.MupM Jeanne Coons Thomas R.Seashell Jim Pons Roger Suntan William G.Share, DISTRICT NO.2: �_ JOM Collins.Chair George Scon Daniel T.Welch.Chair are tam John M.Gellman 1 Bash Dares Bob Bell x Berme DuNap Glenn Parker Norman 2.Eckemodc Carol DPanoy James H.Flom Stave Anderson per McGuigan Ted R.Moreno Mark A.Murphy Jearme Coomz y Julie So Chas NPrby x Sheldon Singer George L.Zlaket I Roger Shamon William G.Swim, _L Bob Z.6 Tom Daly DISTRICT NO.3: x Sal A.Samen. Clair Harry M.Dorton Burnie Demap. Chair pro tam Glenn Parker 1 Cecilia Age Walter Bowman * George Brown Merlyn Bruce Hearings J_ John Collins George Seen i James H.Flora Steve Anderson x Don R.Griffin Pots,Marshall i Victor Lempng Ralph Bauer i Wally Unn Eva G.Minor Pat McGuigan Ted R.Moreno X Margie L.Rice Grace Epperson _L Jet.Sa Chris North, X Sheldon Singer George L.Zlaket 1 Roger Stanton W llum G.Steiner Charles GyHid Ruben Wahlslrom Bob Zemel Tom Daly DISTRICT 140.5: Jan Gebay.Chair x John C.Cox,Jr. X William G.Steiner, Chair pro ttm _ Roger Stanton John C.Cox,Jr. _ Jan Debav DISTRICT NO.6: James M. Ferryman.Clair I Arlene Schafer Jan Dewy,Chair pro tam John C.Cox,Jr. g William G.Samir ROBer Sumon DISTRICT NO. 7: Barry Hammond,Chair Mike Ward Thomas R. Sanarch.Chair pro tam Jim Pons Jan Dehay Jahn C.Cox,Jr. James W Ferryman _ Arlene Staler y Pat McGuigan _ Ted R.Moreno Mark A. Murphy _ Joanne Coosa William G.Blame, _ Roger Samoan DISTRICT NO. 11: i Victor Leipzig,Chair _ Ralph Bauer X Shirley DeviloN.Chair pro rem _ Ralph Bauer Roger Stamen _ Wiliam G.Steiner DISTRICT NO. 13: 3 John M. GPllmson, Chair _ Ddreel T.Welch x, Bob Zombi.Chair pro tam _ Tom Daly X Me*A. Murphy _ Joanne Coosa _ Glenn Parker Burnie Gambia g William G.Stempr _ Roger Stamm DISTRICT NO. 14: Thomas R.Salarelli,Chair _ Jim Potts X Mark A. MumM. Clair Pro hem _ items Cmnn Bally Ramrnand _ Mike Ward a William G.Sterner _ paper Stamen y Peer A.Swan _ Darryl Who, -2- 09f27195 � STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Don McIntyre, General Manager, Blake P. Anderson, Assistant General Manager-Operations, Judith A. Wilson, Assistant General Manager-Administration, Penny Kyle, Board Secretary, Laurie Bluestein, Gary Hasenstab, Ed Hodges, Steve Hovey, Patricia Jonk, John Linder, David Ludwin, Charles McGee, Pat McNelly, Mike Moore, Bob Ooten, Stuart Severn, Gary Streed, Nancy Wheatley, Paula Zeller OTHERS PRESENT: Terry Andrus, Assistant General Counsel, Bill Knopf, George Zlaket, Alternate Director DISTRICT 6 Appointment of Chair pro tem In the absence of Chair James M. Ferryman and Chair pro tem Jan Debay, Director William G. Steiner was appointed Chair pro tem of District No. 6. ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Joint Chair The Joint Chair reported on the success of Family Day held on September 23, 1995, and advised that over 500 staff and family members attended the event. The following tentatively scheduled upcoming meetings were then announced, as follows: Operations, Maintenance, and Technical Services Committee - Wednesday, October 4, at 5:30 p.m. Planning, Design, and Construction Committee -Thursday, October 5, at 5:30 p.m. Finance, Administrative, and Human Resources Committee - Wednesday, October 11, at 5:30 p.m. Executive Committee - Wednesday, October 18, at 5:30 p.m. ALL DISTRICTS Report of the General Manager The General Manager advised the Directors that parking passes were included in their meeting folders, and that it would be necessary to display the pass upon entering the plant premises. -3- 09/27/95 • Nancy Wheatley then introduced Charles McGee, who discussed the Districts' recent findings that some of our beach monitoring results indicate higher than normal bacterial counts. He explained the Districts increased beach and near-shore monitoring in response to those results, and the retaining of Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc. to assist in assessment of possible on-shore sources of contamination. While we have concluded that the source of the elevated counts is not our outfall, we have been unsuccessful in determining the actual cause. We have elected to continue efforts locate the source(s) of the contamination even though the responsibility is not ours because the County is not in a financial position to carry on the work itself. Ms. Wheatley advised that prudent actions would be taken to ascertain the on-shore source(s) of the contamination. DISTRICT 1 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the special meeting held August 21, 1995, and the regular meeting held August 23, 1995. the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT2 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the special meeting held August 21, 1995, and the regular meeting held August 23, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 3 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the special meeting held August 21, 1995, and the regular meeting held August 23, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the special meeting held August 21, 1995, and the regular meeting held August 23, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 6 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the special meeting held August 21, 1995, and the regular meeting held August 23, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -4- r i 09/27/95 DISTRICT 7 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the special meeting held August 21, 1995, and the regular meeting held August 23, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 11 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the special meeting held August 21, 1995, and the regular meeting held August 23, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 13 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the special meeting held August 21, 1995, and the regular meeting held August 23, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 14 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held August 23, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. ALL DISTRICTS Ratification of payment of Joint and Individual District Claims Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That payment of Joint and Individual District claims set forth on exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. -5- 09/27/95 08/23/95 09/06/95 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $676,963.47 $599,246.29 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 251.686.38 369,191.55 Joint Working Capital Fund - 197,965.10 241,683.58 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 29,163.56 31,663.69 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 0.00 9,562.93 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 2,793.58 215,175.79 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 14,518.22 392.564.10 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 406.41 9,853.31 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 100.00 5,267.86 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 39,811.67 19,139.95 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 115,685.29 7,968.33 DISTRICT NO. 13 - 105.60 1,266.10 DISTRICT NO, 14 - 2,812.76 4,494.51 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 &6 JOINT - 574.20 3,503.90 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 1,371.62 2,563.16 DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 3 83 . 76.40 5,815.95 $1367,83426 $1,918,961.00 ALL DISTRICTS Awarding Purchase of Ferric Chloride, Specification No. C-039. to Kemiron Pacific, Inc. Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 95-99, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Purchase of Ferric Chloride, Specification No. 0-039, to Kemiron Pacific, Inc., for the delivered price of$257.50 per dry ton, including sales tax and shipping, for a seven-month period, and $228.00 per dry ton, including sales tax and shipping, for a one-year period beginning December 1, 1995, with provision for four one-year extensions. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -6- 09/27/95 ' s ALL DISTRICTS Authorizina staff to issue a purchase order contrail to Digital Eauipment Corporation for Computer Hardware and Software Maintenance Services. (Specification No. M-044) Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue a purchase order contract to Digital Equipment Corporation for Computer Hardware and Software Maintenance Services (Specification No. M-055), for a one-year period beginning October 1, 1995, in an amount not to exceed $84,168.52, plus sales tax. Director Mark A. Murphy requested that his opposition to the motion be made a matter of record. ALL DISTRICTS Awarding Purchase of Twenty-Five Sets of Filter Media Belts, Specification No S-074 to Gierlich-Mitchell. Inc. Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the bid tabulation and recommendation for award of purchase order contract for Purchase of Twenty-Five Sets of Filter Media Belts, Specification No. S-074, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase order contract be, and is hereby, awarded to Gierlich-Mitchell, Inc., for a total amount not to exceed $91.125.00, plus sales tax. -7- 09/27/95 ALL DISTRICTS Authorizina the General Manager to approve participation of Districts' Senior Environmental Specialist in the annual meeting of the Society of Environmental Toxicologv and Chemistry (SETAC) and the American Society for Testina and Materials (ASTM). November 4-9. 1995. in Vancouver. British Columbia. Canada Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to approve participation of Tom Gerlinger, Districts' Senior Environmental Specialist, in the annual meeting of the Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) and the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), November 4, 1995 through November 9, 1995, in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reimbursement for transportation, lodging, meals, and incidental expenses be, and is hereby, authorized in accordance with Districts' established expense reimbursement policies. ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file draft minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization Study Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the draft minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization Study meetings held on July 19, July 25, August 2, and September 7, 1995, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file draft minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re Landfill Acquisition Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the draft minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re Landfill Acquisition meetings held on August 9 and 16, 1995, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file draft minutes of the Steerina Committee Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the draft minutes of the Steering Committee meeting held on August 23, 1995, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. -8- 09/27/95 ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file draft minutes of the Operations. Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the draft minutes of the Operations, Maintenance, and Technical Services Committee meeting held on September 6, 1995, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file draft minutes of the Planning. Design. and Construction Committee Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the draft minutes of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee meeting held on September 7, 1995, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file draft minutes of the Finance. Administration. and Human Resources Committee Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the draft minutes of the Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee meeting held on September 13, 1995, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file draft minutes of the Executive Committee Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the draft minutes of the Executive Committee meeting held on September 20, 1995, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. -9- 09/27/95 ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to GTE for the Purchase of Meridian 1 Upgrade for PBX at Plant No. 1 and Purchase of Meridian 1 PBX at Plant No. 2 (Specification No. E-258) Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue a purchase order to GTE, in a total amount not to exceed $87,337.81, plus sales tax, for the Purchase of Meridian 1 Option 61 Upgrade for PBX at Plant No. 1, and Purchase of Meridian 1 Option 11 E PBX for Plant No. 2 (Specification No. E-258). ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to GTE for Telephone Systems Maintenance Agreement (Soecification No. P-163) Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue a purchase order to GTE for a Telephone Systems Maintenance Agreement for the Districts' telephone PBX and related equipment (Specification No. P-163), for a three-year period beginning October 1, 1995 to September 30, 1998, for an amount not to exceed $74,113.80 for existing equipment. ALL DISTRICTS (OMTS95-039) AAporovino plans and specifications re Job No. J-31-2 Moved, seconded, and duly carried, That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 95-100, approving plans and specifications for Ocean Outfall Booster Station Control System Upgrade at Plants Nos. 1 &2, Job No. J-31-2, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -10- } 09/27/95 ALL DISTRICTS (OMTS95-042) Authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Waters Corporation for Purchase of a High Pressure Liquid Chromatography System (Specification No. E-260) Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue a purchase order to Waters Corporation for the Purchase of a Discovery System 616, Millennium 2010 Pentium SS High Pressure Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) System (Specification No. E-260), for a total amount not to exceed $74,210.00, plus sales tax and shipping. ALL DISTRICTS (PDC95-28) Approving Specific Term Employment Agreement with Joseph T. Horvath Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 95-101, approving Specific Term Employment Agreement with Joseph T. Horvath for specialized construction management and inspection services for various master-planned construction projects, on an as-needed basis at the hourly rate of$35.00 for a two-year period beginning October 11, 1995, with option for a one year extension. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Approving interest rate for deferred excess capacity charge agreements Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the interest rate for deferred excess capacity charge agreements equal to the rate charged on the date of the agreement on U.S. Treasury Bills or Notes with a term most close to the term of agreement plus 100 basis points be, and is hereby, approved. Directors Margie L. Rice and Roger R. Stanton requested that their opposition to the motion be made a matter of record. -11- 09/27/95 ALL DISTRICTS Approving agreement for Real Property Lease at Plant No. 1. Specification No. L-009-1 with First Federal Bank of California Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 95-102, approving agreement for Real Property Lease at Plant No. 1, Specification No. L-009-1, With First Federal Bank of California, for a three-year period beginning September 1, 1995, for a minimum amount of$60,000 per year or 10% of the annual gross revenue rentals, whichever is greater. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Status_report re County's Commingled Investment Pool Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager of Operations, gave a brief report on the status of the Orange County Commingled Investment Pool and the County of Orange bankruptcy. ALL DISTRICTS General Counsel's comments Prior to Closed Session General Counsel reported to the Directors the need for a closed session as authorized by Government Code Section 54956.9(a) to discuss and consider the items that are specified as Items 14(b)(1), (2), and (3) on the published Agenda. No other items would be discussed or acted upon. ALL DISTRICTS Convene in Closed Session pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9fa1 The Boards convened in closed session at 8:17 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a). Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Boards of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. ALL DISTRICTS Reconvene in regular session At 8:52 p.m., the Boards reconvened in regular session. -12- i 09/27/95 ALL DISTRICTS Serranlino v. County Sanitation Districts, OCSC Case No. 737044 General Counsel reported that during closed session, the Boards of Directors had voted unanimously to file an appeal of the Superior Court action granting Plaintiffs motion for peremptory writ of mandate. DISTRICT NO. 3 County Sanitation District No. 3 Y. United Technologies Corporation. at al.. OCSC Case No. 722816 General Counsel reported that during closed session, the Boards of Directors acted to oppose Defendant United Technologies Corporation's appeal and file a cross-appeal. ALL DISTRICTS Matters for future agenda action and staff report Director John M. Gullixson requested that the the time clock issue be agendized for the Joint Board meeting to be held on October 25, 1995, for referral to the Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee for review. DISTRICT 1 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:55 p.m. DISTRICT 2 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:55 p.m. DISTRICT 3 Adioumment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:55 p.m. -13- 09/27/95 DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Receive and file Selection Committee minutes Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the minutes of the Districts Nos. 5 and 6 Selection Committee held September 8, 1995, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Approving Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for design of Contract Nos. 5-37-3 and 5-37-4 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee relative to Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for design and construction services required for Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3, Contract No. 5-37-3, and Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 4, Contract No. 5-37-4, providing for additional design and construction support services, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 95-103, approving Addendum No. 1 to said agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for said additional services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, direct expenses, subconsultant fees, and fixed profit, for an additional amount not to exceed $48,186.00, increasing the total authorized compensation from $165.100.00 to an amount not to exceed $213,286.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 5 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:55 p.m. -14- 09/27/95 DISTRICTS 6 7 & 14 Approving Change Order No. 2 to the Plans and specifications for Contract No. 14-1-1A Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-1A, authorizing an addition of$213,171.91 to the contract with Mladen Buntich Construction Co., Inc., for 13 items of additional work, and granting a time extension of 73 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICT 6 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:55 p.m. DISTRICT 7 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:55 p.m. DISTRICT 11 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:55 p.m. DISTRICT 13 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:55 p.m. -15- 09/27/95 DISTRICT 14 A journment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the l�mmeeeeetiing�so adjourned at 8:55 p.m. /a4o �k 0 Secretary c t B r Is of Directors of County nitati n istricts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 1, 13 and 14 -16- FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 011795 PAGE 1 ' REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SAWTATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0&12395 POSTING DATE 0=395 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 146500 AEE ENERGY SEMINARS $595.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION-TECHNICAL 1465DI AG TECH COMPANY $52.397.80 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10.9-01 146502 AT&T-SMALL BUS.ADVANTAGE $696.50 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 146503 ADAMSON INDUSTRIES $383.54 LAB SUPPLIES 146504 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $18,037.20 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.O.8-949 146505 AIR&WASTE MGMT.ASSOC. $490.00 WORKSHOP REGISTRATION 1465D8 ALTA-ROBBINS $262.40 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 146507 AAES $174.00 PUBLICATION 146508 AMERICAN COMPUTER&COMM. $149.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 146509 AMERICAN PROTECTIVE SER.INC. $734.40 SECURITY SERVICES 145510 AMERICAN SIGMA $23,048.45 METER PARTS 146511 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION $8.895.50 EMERGENCY SEWER REPAIRS 146512 ANALYSTS,INC. $749.76 OIL ANALYSIS 146513 SLAKE P.ANDERSON $108.73 REIMBURSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE 146514 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $1,779.30 NOTICES&ADS 146515 ARROWHEAD ELECTRIC CO. $163.81 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES TT1 146516 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE,INC. $6.095.20 WASTE REMOVAL X 146517 ATKIWJONES COMPUTER SERVICE $321.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT 14651& AUTO SHOP EQUIPMENT CO. $461.63 TRUCK PARTS L10 146519 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $3,926.33 PAYROLL SERVICES .� 146520 BKK LANDFILL $3.889.75 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10.9-91 146521 BRIM SAFETY&SUPPLY $550.82 SAFETY SUPPLIES D 146522 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $4,512.39 BATTERIES t� 146523 BAUER COMPRESSOR $476.79 COMPRESSOR PARTS 145524 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS.INC. $5.618.67 LAB SUPPLIES 146525 B10-GRO DIVISION $40,397A1 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.4-26-95 146528 BIOMERIEUXVITEK,INC. $274.44 LAB SUPPLIES W527 BONA-RUES $713.53 TRUCK PARTS W528 BORNEMANN PUMPS,INC. $5,498.84 PUMP PARTS 146529 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $28.502.98 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-14 146M BRONSON,BRONSON&MCKINNON $14,859.32 LEGAL SERVICES-COUNTY BANKRUPTCY 146531 BUDGET JANITORIAL $3,330.00 JANITORIAL SERVICES 146532 CEBSPROGRAM $269.60 CERTIFICATION REGISTRATION W633 CH2M HILL $150,923.85 ENGINEERING SERVICES J31 146634 C.P.I. $804.35 LAB SUPPLIES 146535 CS COMPANY $1,245.89 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 146536 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH,INC. $59.26 LAB REPAIRS 146537 CALIFORNIA AUTO COLLISION,INC. $315.60 TRUCKPARTS 146538 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $115.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 146539 CANUS CORPORATION $3,044.58 FIBER OPTIC CABLE 148540 CARLETON ENGINEERS $2,800.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES-AIR QUALITY 146541 MDT/CASTLE $449.18 LABSUPPLIES 146542 CENTURY SAFETY INST.&SUPPLY $1,057.89 SAFETY SUPPLIES 146543 CHASE,ROTCHFORD.DRUKKER $4.273.21 LEGAL SERVICES-PLT 2 ACCIDENT 140" CHEMWEST,INC. $41.693.47 PUMP PARTS 146545 COUCH&SONS $58.121.70 CONSTRUCTION I1-17-1 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE W17M5 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0523I95 POSTING DATE 0823AA WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 146545 COMPUSERVE $266.56 COMPUTER SERVICES 146547 CONSOLIDATED REPOGRAPHICS $79.09 ENGINEERING SUPPLIES 146648 CONSUMER PIPE $1,111.72 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 146549 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC. $557.26 TOOLS 146550 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS O C $455.62 CONSULTING SERVICES M.O.S-11.93 146551 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $15,102.92 FITTINGS 146552 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $322.14 TRUCK PARTS 146553 R E COULTER CRANE RENTAL $552.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 146554 COUNTERPART ENTERPRISES $2,062.98 COMPRESSOR PARTS 146555 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 8645.85 ELECTRIC PARTS 14655E CWWLES P.CROWLEY.CO. $568.45 PUMPS 146557 CURTIN MATHESON SCIENTIFIC $2.482.50 LAB SUPPLIES 146558 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $100.00 REPORTFEE 146559 HSKIDECKER $067.16 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 146560 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIF. $22,365.36 DENTAL INSURANCE PLAN M.O.1-12-94 146561 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $786.48 PAINT SUPPLIES m 146562 OVALS SALES $280.32 FITTINGS X 146563 EASTMAN,INC. $4.902.69 OFFICE SUPPLIES s 146564 EBERHARD EQUIPMENT $416.26 TRUCK PARTS 146565 EDWARDS DIV.OF GS BLDG SYS. $3,131.77 SAFETY SUPPLIEWSERVICE AGREEMENT 146566 ELECTRO TEST,INC. $2,944.00 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 146567 ELECTRICAL INSULATION $92.21 INSTRUMENTATION SUPPLIES y 146568 EMPIRE SCALE CO. $433.30 PRINTER 146569 ENCAD $70.04 COMPUTER SOFTWARE N 146570 ENCHANTER,INC. $3,500.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5.24-95 148571 FMC CORP. $60,446.99 HYDROGEN PEROXIDE M.O.9-14-94 145572 FASTFRAME OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $395.68 AWARDS FRAMING 146573 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $57.25 AIR FREIGHT 140574 FILTERLINE CORP. $55.09 FILTERS 146575 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $471.78 LAB SUPPLIES 146576 FISIONS INSTRUMENTS $11,527.35 SERVICE AGREEMENT 146577 FLOSYSTEMS.INC. $38,771.07 PUMP PARTS 146578 FLUID METERING,INC. $658.50 LAB SUPPLIES 146579 FOSSMARITIMECO. $1,600.00 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 146580 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $26.25 PHOTOSUPPLIES 146581 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $17,708.40 WATER USE 146582 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $628,97 PAINT SUPPLIES 140553 THE FOXBORO CO. $1.706.40 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 146584 FRAZEE PAINT$WALCOVERING $472.76 PAINT SUPPLIES 146585 FREEDOM IMAGING $76.65 SERVICE AGREEMENT 146588 FRYS ELECTRONICS -$52024 ELECTRIC GEAR 146587 GET,INC. $4,421.08 OFFICE SUPPLIES 146568 TED&GAEBLER $51000.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING FEE 146559 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $40.72 LUMBERIHARDWARE 146590 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $1,682.63 ELECTRIC PARTS 146591 GENERA.TELEPHONE CO. $7,752.16 TELEPHONE SERVICES FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8117195 PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID OBI23/95 POSTING DATE 0812Y95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 146592 UFE TECHNOLOGIESIGIBCO/BRL $58.62 LAB SUPPLIES 146593 GIERLICH41TCHELL,INC. $2.952.20 PUMP PARTS 146594 GOLDEN COAST SAWDUST PROD. $1.616.25 SAWDUST 146595 WAN GRAINGER,INC. $138.53 ELECTRIC PARTS 146596 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $2,149.91 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 146597 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $5.752.03 PRINTING - 146595 DGACONSULTANTS $3,560.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-8-94 146599 HB TYPE&GRAPHICS $187.49 PRINTING 146600 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $7,3D7.15 TRUCK PARTS 146601 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $511.72 HARDWARE 146602 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS $1,830.00 CONTAINER RENTALS 146603 HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT $2.083.33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN. 146604 HEWLETT PACKARD CO. $1,008.56 VALVES 146605 HOLMES&NARVER,INC. $2.362.10 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-44 146608 HOME DEPOT $395.01 HARDWARE 146607 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $265.77 PAINTSUPPUES 146608 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $2.359.00 PERMIT FEE X 146609 IPCO SAFETY $3.185.49 SAFETY SUPPLIES s 146610 IRD MECHANALYSIS $2.853.21 MECHANICAL ANALYSIS by 146611 [BCD,INC. $213.07 INSTRUMENT PARTS 146612 IMAGING PLUS,INC. $928.20 LAB SUPPLIES 146613 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $48,950.85 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11.18.92 y 146614 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $504.79 CONNECTORS 146615 INGERSOLL-RAND EQUIP CORP. $143.64 TRUCK PARTS W 146618 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE $348.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 146617 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $1,136.67 BATTERIES 146618 J2 PRINTING SERVICES $371.79 PRINTING 146619 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY. $1,298.57 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 146620 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $53.21 ELECTRIC PARTS 146621 JONES CHEMICALS.INC. $5,299.07 CHEMICALS 146622 KMI INDUSTRIES $114.66 PLUMBING SUPPLIES M623 KELLEY BLUE BOOK $136.00 SUBSCRIPTION 146624 KEYE PRODUCTIVITY CENTER $1,945.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING REGISTRATION 146625 KING BEARING,INC. $1.209.88 MACHINE SUPPLIES 146626 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $4,083.N TOOLS 146627 L A CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $1.059.01 CELLULAR TELEPHONE CHARGES 146628 LAIDLAW ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES $706.40 WASTE DISPOSAL 146629 LEYSOLD VACUUM PRODUCTS $192.52 LAB SUPPLIES 146630 MDT BIOLOGIC COMPANY $477.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 146631 MPS $184.45 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 146632 MAGNETEK $1.160.50 ELECTRIC PARTS 146633 MARKON COMPUTER SCIENCE $1,479.56 INSTRUMENT PARTS 146634 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $BW.82 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 146635 MCKENNA ENGR.&EQUIP. $275.55 PUMP PARTS 146636 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3,897.25 UNIFORM RENTALS 146637 NATIONAL ENVIRO.INFO.SERV. $11&50 LAB SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE W17M5 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0823195 POSTING DATE 0823195 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 146638 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES.INC. $4,515.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 146639 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $350.00 MEMBERSHIP FEES 146640 NEUTRON $1,751.89 ANIONIC POLYMER M.0.8-10-94 146641 NEWARK ELECTRONICS $193.23 LAB SUPPLIES 146642 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $432.35 SAFETY GLASSES 146643 OPERATION TECHNOLOGY,INC. $1.578.54 SERVICE AGREEMENT 146644 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO. $1.065.37 CHEMICALS 146645 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $1.411.60 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 146646 ORANGE COURIER $442.85 COURIER SERVICES 146647 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. $3.949.39 FITTINGS 146648 OXYGEN SERVICE $2,694A3 SPECIALTY GASES 146649 COUNTY OF ORANGE $273.00 PERMIT FEES 146650 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT $60.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 146651 PSSI $1,603.80 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION 146652 PACIFIC CLIPPINGS $124.90 NEWSPAPER CLIPPING SERVICE 146653 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $1.584.49 PLUMBING SUPPLIES X 146654 PACIFIC PARTS $7,648.09 INSTRUMENT PARTS = 146655 PACIFIC BELL $1.387.57 TELEPHONE SERVICES 146656 PAGENET $3.902.53 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 146657 PARAMOUNT TANK,INC. $668.71 TANK INSPECTION SERVICES 146658 PARTS UNLIMITED $431.20 TRUCK PARTS 146659 PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION $4,878.25 SERVICE AGREEMENT D 146660 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $3,909.67 REIMB.PETTY CASH,TRAINING&TRAVEL r 146661 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $105,964.20 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3-29-95 146662 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS $42.125.34 COMPUTER HARDWARE-M.0.5-24-95 146663 POHLSON,MOORHEAD&GOETHALS 11313.50 CAL-0SHA INVESTIGATION 146664 POLYMETRICS,INC. $2,525.50 LAB SUPPLIES 146665 POLYPURE,INC. $9,178.42 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3.11-92 146666 POST CONSUMER PRODUCTS $5,182.22 AWARDS 146667 POWER MACHINE CO. $370.33 MECHANICAL PARTS 146668 POWER SYSTEMS TESTING CO. $1.249.99 ELECTRIC PARTS 146669 PRECISION GLASS BLOWING $506.03 LAB SUPPLIES 146670 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $160.00 ICE 146671 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE IND. $2,091.00. SOIL TESTING 146672 PROMINENT FLUID CONTROL.INC. 5410AD VALVES 146673 R&R INSTRUMENTS $1,081.02 INSTRUMENT PARTS 148674 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $2,062.75 TRASH REMOVAL 146675 RANIN INSTRUMENT CO. $806.30 LAB SUPPLIES 146676 REDWINGSHOES $102.58 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 146677 THE REGISTER $211.20 NOTICES&ADS 146678 REISH MARINE STUDIES,INC. $560.00 OCEAN MONITORING 146679 RELIANCE ELECTRIC $1,277.48 ELECTRIC PARTS 146680 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $3,391.98 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 146681 RM MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL $69.67 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 146682 SAS INSTITUTE,INC. $1,266.07 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 146683 SPSS.INC. $314.00 COMPUTER SOFTWARE FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 811795 PAGES ' REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0823195 POSTING DATE 082395 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 146684 SAN DIEGO SAFETY COUNCIL $243.64 PUBLICATION 146685 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $120.71 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 146686 SCHWINGAMERICA $1.879.42 VALVE PARTS 146667 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $708.72 SPECIALTY GASES 146688 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $9.930.76 TOOLS 146689 SHURELUCK SALES $3.035.88 TOOLSOIARDWARE 146690 SIEVERS INSTRUMENTS,INC. $305.05 LAB SUPPLIES 146691 SKILL PATH,INC. $99.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING REGISTRATION 146692 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $35.80 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 146693 THE SMITH GROUP $3.544.80 TECHNICAL SERVICES STUDY 146694 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP. $631.87 TOOLS 146895 SO COAST AIR QUALITY $17,345.99 PERMIT FEES 146696 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY $11.606.79 PERMIT FEES 146697 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY $6.60 PERMIT FEES 146698 SOUTH COAST WATER $35.00 LAB SUPPLIES 146699 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. $95.136.28 POWER M 146700 SO.CAL GAS.CO. $68,078.98 NATURAL GAS X 146701 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER $2,322.88 DRINKING WATERICOOLER RENTALS 146702 STAMEN Z.SPASSOFF P.E. $12.000.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19.2 00 W03 SUMMIT STEEL $339AI METAL 146704 SUNSET FORD $427.05 TRUCK PARTS Y 146705 SUPELCO,INC. $127.05 LAB SUPPLIES 1467DS SUPERB ONE-HOUR PHOTO $13.15 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES lfl 148707 TCH ASSOCIATES $491.91 LAB SUPPLIES 146708 TEKTRONIX,INC. $1,392.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 146709 THOMASONSTANLEY,INC. $104.73 FITTINGS W710 THORPE INSULATION $48.38 INSULATION 146711 TOLEDO SCALE CORP. $300.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS 146712 TONYS LOCK&SAFE SERVICE $4.557.08 LOCKS&KEYS 146713 THETRANECOMPANY $2.803.86 PUMP 146714 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES $3,169.00 TRAVEL SERVICES M.O.6-28-95 146715 TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY,INC. 52,262.00 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.O.S11-94 146710 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $429.97 TRUCK PARTS 146717 TRUCK PARTS SUPPLY $68.38 TRUCK PARTS 146718 TRUESDAIL LABS $588.00 LAB SERVICES 146719 JO TUCKER&SON,INC. $656.85 INSTRUMENT PARTS 149720 TUSTIN DODGE $38.91 TRUCK PARTS 146721 U.S.AUTO GLASS CENTERS $576.47 TRUCK PARTS M722 UNISOURCEWOR BUTLER PAPER $88.68 OFFICE SUPPLIES 146723 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $88.91 PARCEL SERVICES 146724 DATAVAULTIUS SAFE DEPOSIT CO. $104.00 COMPUTER BACK-UP STORAGE 146725 VWR SCIENTIFIC $1,809.69 LAB SUPPLIES 146726 VALCO INSTRUMENTS CO.,INC. $421.40 LAB SUPPLIES 146727 WESTERN METRO $88.97 MECHANICAL PARTS 148728 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $901.95 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 146729 VANIER BUSINESS FORMS $914.80 OFFICE SUPPLIES FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8117195 PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 08123/95 POSTING DATE OB23195 WARRANT NO. VENDOR 146730 VARIABLE SPEED DRIVES 51,982.51 INSTRUMENT PARTS 146731 VARIAN ASSOCIATES,INC. $2,597.04 LAB SUPPLIES 146732 VERTEX TECHNOLOGIES,INC. $975.74 FIBER OPTIC CABLE 146733 VERTEX SYSTEMS $2,354.50 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT 146734 VILLAGE NURSERIES $496.44 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 146735 VORTEX INDUSTRIES 5235.64 BUILDING REPAIRS 146736 CARL WARREN&CO. $441.66 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR 146737 WARRINGTON $115.00 HARDWARE 146738 WEATHER AND WIND INSTRUMENT $475.03 SAFETY SUPPLIES 146739 WGRA WORKSHOPS $1,500.00 MEMBERSHIP FEE 148740 WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCTS $118.10 SAFETYSUPPLIES 146741 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $36,477.72 CAUSTIC SODA&HYPOCHLORIDE M.0.8-12-92&413-94 146742 WEST4.ITE SUPPLY CO. $459.95 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 146743 WESCO $780.00 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES _ 1467" WHESSOE-VAREC,INC. $1.816.78 MECHANICAL PARTS 146745 XEROX CORP. $13.848.06 COPIER LEASES M 146746 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $1,292.63 LABSUPPLIES X 145747 JOHNSON YOKOGAWA CORP. $1,350.19 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES .s. 146748 Z WORLD ENGINEERING $235.65 LAB SUPPUES lA 1,367,834.28 m SUMMARY AMOUNT 02 OPER FUND $431.48 02 CAP FAC FUND 2,362.10 03 OPER FUND 11,933.22 03 CAP FAC FUND 2,585.00 95 OPER FUND 40SAI 06 CAP FAC FUND 100.00 07 OPER FUND 11,308.69 07 CAP FAC FUND 28,502.98 #11 OPER FUND 57.292.59 011 CAP FAC FUND 58.392.70 913 OPER FUND 105.60 014 OPER FUND 0.00 014 CAP FAC FUND 2,812.76 05&6 OPER FUND 22.20 05&6 CAP FAC FUND 562.00 06167 OPER FUND 1,371.62 07&14 OPER FUND 33.876.40 JT OPER FUND 676,963.47 CORF 251.686.38 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND 29,163.56 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL 197,965.10 1,367,834.26 PROCESSING DATE 8131/95 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 09106195 POSTING DATE 09MM5 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 146760 AG TECH COMPANY E56,164.27 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9.91 146761 AM BEST COMPANY $101.95 PUBLICATION 146762 ASL CONSULTING ENGINEERS $1.310.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 2-7A 146763 ATM AA,INC. $2,295.00 LAB SERVICES 146764 AT&T -UNIPLAN SERVICE $2,392.99 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 146765 AT&T-MEGACOM SERVICE $967.80 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 146766 AT&T-PROWATTS $0.91 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 146767 A-Z LOGIC SYSTEMS $126.00 COMPUTER EQUIP.REPAIRS 146768 ACCOUNTANTS OVERLOAD $1,396.50 TEMPORARY PERSONNEL 146769 ADAMS PRECISION INSTRUMENTATION $562.46 MACHINE REPAIRS 146770 ADAMSON INDUSTRIES $1,135.77 LAB SUPPLIES 146771 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $36.074.40 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.O.&9-69 146772 ALFA-LAVAL,INC. $749.82 INSTRUMENT PARTS 146773 AMER SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS $1.786.50 TECHNICAL SEMINAR REGISTRATION 146774 AMERICAN AIRLINES $2,517.00 TRAVEL CHARGES T1'I 146775 AMERICAN PROTECTIVE SERVICES,INC. $6,436.20 SECURITY SERVICES X 146776 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION $4,899.18 SEWER REPAIRS = 1467" ANIXTER-DISTRIBUTION $1,028.66 COMPUTER SUPPLIES lA 146778 A-PLUS SYSTEMS E3,180.17 NOTICES 8ADS 146779 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $1.372.74 FIBER OPTIC PARTS 146780 ABC LABORATORIES E3,82825 LAB SERVICES 146781 AWARDS&TROPHIES $11.94 PLAQUES I... 146782 BFI MEDICAL WASTE SYSTEMS $4.00 WASTE DISPOSAL 146783 BKK LANDFILL $2,242,51 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10.&91 146764 BAUER COMPRESSOR $587.76 COMPRESSOR PARTS 146785 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. E2,652.65 LAB SUPPLIES 146780 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. E42030 TRUCK WASH TICKETS 146787 BENZ ENGINEERING,INC. $540.92 COMPRESSOR PARTS 146786 BLACK&VEATCH E20,812.25 ENGINEERING SERVICES P146 M789 BOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE $255.06 TRUCK REPAIRS 146790 BON-AWES E500.65 TRUCK PARTS 146791 BRENNERFIEDLER&ASSOC.,INC. $638.55 LAB SUPPLIES 146792 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. $613.09 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 146793 BUSH&ASSOCIATES,INC. $2,648.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.68-94 146794 GEM CORPORATION $536.12 LAB SUPPLIES 146795 CH2M HILL $99.318.84 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-31 146795 C.L TECHNOLOGY $720.00 GAS ANALYSIS SERVICES 146797 CALFON CONSTRUCTION $216.741.80 CONSTRUCTION 3-38-2 146798 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $107.24 SERVICE AGREEMENT 146799 CAMALI CORP. $400.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 146800 JOHN CARDLLO ENGINEERS $14.333.25 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-15.2 146801 JOHN CAROL-0 ENGINEERS $29.905.74 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-332,P1-38 146802 CENTURY SAFETY INST.&SUPPLY $138.83 LAB SUPPLIES M803 CERFNET $41.56 SERVICE AGREEMENT 1468M COLE-PALMER INSTRUMENT CO. $1,255.83 LAB SUPPLIES 146805 COUCH AND SONS $18OZ6.38 CONSTRUCTION I1-17-1 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 09/00/95 POSTING DATE 09MMS WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 146806 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $1,687.37 ENGINE PARTS 146807 COMPUTEMP $232.00 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 146808 CONNEL GM PARTS/DIV. $23.49 TRUCK PARTS 146809 CONSUMER PIPE $145.69 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 146810 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $5,128.31 MACHINE PARTS 146811 COUNTERPART ENTERPRISES $2,830.05 COMPRESSOR PARTS 146812 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $5,313.59 ELECTRIC PARTS 146813 THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY $175.00 TECHNICAL WORKSHOP REG. 146014 HSK/DECKER $1,159.89 GAUGE 146815 DEZURICKAND/ORCSCO. $26,678.83 VALVES 146816 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $1,329.92 SERVICE AGREEMENT 146817 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY S470.0D ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 146815 DUNKEL BROS MACH.MOVING $1,100.00 MACHINE TRANSPORT 146819 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $1,957.51 PAINT SUPPLIES 1468" ERIM/MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL CONF. $880.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING REGISTRATION 146821 ESP NORTH $723.00 VALVES X 146822 EASTMAN,INC. $5,947.79 OFFICE SUPPLIES = 146823 EMERGENCY MGMT NETWORK $1,700.00 FIRST AID TRAINING by 146824 ENCHANTER,INC. $3,500.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5.24-95 146825 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC, $867.70 LAB SERVICES 146826 EXECUTIVE SOFTWARE $16,529.85 COMPUTER SOFTWARE Do 146827 FLUID TECH,SALES S815.42 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES N 146828 FST SAND AND GRAVEL,INC. $1,231.58 ROAD BASE MATERIALS 146829 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE S5,601.25 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 146830 FIBERTRON $243.14 COMPUTER PARTS 146831 FILTERUNE CORP. $658.37 FILTERS 146832 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $68.31 FILTERS 146833 FIRST CHOICE $1,559.06 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT 146834 FIRST COMPANY&/OR NORTHERN DIST. $195.51 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 146835 FISCHER&PORTER CO. $19SS7 OFFICE SUPPLIES 146836 FLOSYSTEMS,INC. $251.89 PUMP PARTS 146837 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $20.38 PHOTO SUPPLIES 146838 THE FOXBORO CO. $1,569.74 INSTRUMENT PARTS 146839 FREEDOM IMAGING $76.65 SERVICE AGREEMENT 146MO FR1"S ELECTRONICS $557.17 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 146841 GIST,INC. $10.050.36 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 146842 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $276.41 LUMBERIHARDWARE 146843 CRY OF GARDEN GROVE S44,402.52 MANHOLE ADJUSTING M.0.6.8-94 146844 GENERAL BINDING CORP. $534.52 OFFICE SUPPLIES 146845 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1.232.19 TELEPHONE SERVICES 146846 GIERLICH-MRCHELL,INC. $3,650.81 PUMP PARTS 146847 GRASSY S.T.I. $546.83 PUMP PARTS 14684E THOMAS GRAY&ASSOC..INC. $567.00 LAB SERVICES 146649 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTNG $169.94 PRINTING 146850 DGA CONSULTANTS $12.459.62 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6S-94 146861 DAVID M.GRIFFITH&ASSOC. $11.491.22 PROFESSIONAL RECRUITING SERVICES 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 09/06195 POSTING DATE 09NB195 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 146852 HACH COMPANY $901.02 LAB SUPPLIES W853 HARBOUR ENGINEERING $10,427.00 PUMP PARTS 146854 PL HAWN CO,INC. $9.013.21 FILTERS 146855 MAY GROUP,INC. $590.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 146856 HELPMATES PERSONNEL SERVICES $1.690.83 TEMPORARY PERSONNEL SERVICES 146857 HOME DEPOT $232.15 HARDWARE 146858 PIS HUGHES CO,INC. $1.228.10 PAINT SUPPLIES M859 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $16.356.83 WATER USE 146860 MICROBE MASTERS $305.35 FREIGHT 146861 IPCO SAFETY $3.722.75 SAFETY SUPPLIES 146862 ISCO,INC. $7.296.40 INSTRUMENTS 146863 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $59.450.71 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11-18-92 146864 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $931.72 CONNECTORS 146885 INFO EDGE,INC. $905.00 PUBLICATION 146866 ISI INFORTEXT $1.341.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 146867 INORGANIC VENTURES,INC. 5387.72 LAB SUPPLIES X 146868 INSIDE E.P.A. 5535.00 SUBSCRIPTION-WATER POLICY RPT.I2YRS) s 146669 INTELLIGENCE PRESS,INC. $790.00 SUBSCRIPTION-NATURAL GAS INTELLIGENCE 146870 IRVINE PHOTO GRAPHICS $5.56 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES W 146871 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $73.50 WATER USE 146872 GREAT WESTERN SANRARY SUPPLY. $390.92 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES fA 146873 JIM'S SUSPENSION SERVICE $25.00 TRUCK REPAIRS I 146874 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $24.05 ELECTRIC PARTS W 146875 KIMMERLE BROS.INC. $60.59 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 146876 KING BEARING,INC. $362.81 MACHINE SUPPLIES 145877 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $1.525.26 TOOLS/HARDWARE 14687E KROHNE AMERICA,INC. $771.10 INSTRUMENT PARTS 146879 L A CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $592.09 CELLULAR TELEPHONE CHARGES 146860 LEE 8 RO CONSULTING ENGR. $15,391.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES P140.2 146881 CRC PRESS.INC. $154.90 LAB SUPPLIES 146882 LIMITOROUE CORP. $4,721.31 ELECTRIC REPAIRS 146883 MPS $196.33 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 146884 MANLEYS BOILER REPAIR CO.,INC. $9.915.84 VALVE PARTS 146885 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $88,984.00 CONSTRUCTION P242-2 146886 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $763.87 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 146887 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO. $2,505.81 TOOLS 146888 CHUCK MCRANEY $561.49 REIMS.CONSTRUCTION CELLULAR PHONE 146689 MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. $80.17 GAUGE 146890 MESA VERDE COUNTRY CLUB $2,022.00 CONSTRUCTION CLEAN-UP 146891 MIDWAY MFG.8 MACHINING $3,705,86 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 146892 MILLTRONICS $143,84 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 146893 MINNESOTA WESTERN VISUAL PRIES. $212.DO PRINTING SUPPLIES 146894 MISCO $273.25 OFFICE SUPPLIES 146895 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3.287.01 UNIFORM RENTALS 146896 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO. $727.00 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 146897 MORTON SALT $500.52 SALT 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0910SM5 POSTING DATE 09/06/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 146898 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $70.35 SAFETY FILM RENTALS 146899 NEUTRON $8.749.18 ANIONIC POLYMER M.O.8-10.94 146900 NEW HORIZONS COMPUTER CENTER 57,200.00 COMPUTER TRAINING 146901 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $38.24 WATER USE 146902 NORTEL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS $2,754.00 SERVICEAGREEMENT 146903 OCEANS'95' $835.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 146904 OMEGA CORP. $456.59 FIRE PROTECTION SUPPLIES 146905 ORACLE CORPORATION $461.00 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 146906 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $2,099.74 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 146907 ORANGE COURIER $133.65 COURIER SERVICES 146908 ORANGE VALVE 8 FITTING CO. $860.72 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 146909 ORRICK HERRINGTON B SUTCLIFFE $15,000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES-ARBITRAGE COMPLIANCE 146910 OXYGEN SERVICE 52,446.41 SPECIALTY GASES 146911 COUNTY OF ORANGE $96,486.62 PROPERTY ATTRIBUTES 146912 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $14.942.75 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP m W913 COUNTY OF ORANGE $203.50 PERMIT FEES X t46914 PCM $295.00 TECHNICAL SEMINAR REGISTRATION 146915 PSSI $1.069.20 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION UO 146916 PACIFIC PARTS $38,623.67 INSTRUMENT PARTS W917 PACIFIC BELL $1,233.86 TELEPHONE SERVICES 146918 PACIFIC WATER CONDITIONING CO. $298.80 EQUIPMENT RENTALS bU 146919 PAK WEST $108.84 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES t 146920 PALMIERI,TYLER WIENER, $165.00 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.6-12-91 M921 PARAGON CABLE $36.78 CABLE SERVICES 146922 PARKHOUSE TIRE,INC. $1.901.79 TIRES 146923 PEERLESS WIPING MATERIALS $635.73 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 146924 PENN-MAYFLOWER $470.00 MOVING SERVICES W925 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $6.349.38 REIMB.PETTY CASH,TRAINING B TRAVEL 146926 PICKWICK PAPER $69.50 STORAGE BOXES 146927 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $124,499.70 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3_29-95 146928 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS $43.413.74 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 146929 POLYPURE,INC. $19,979.47 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3.11-92 146930 POSTAGE BY PHONE $5,000.00 POSTAGE 146931 POWER LIFT/SCMH $416.14 SHELVES 146932 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $208.W ICE 146933 PROMINENT FLUID CONTROL,INC. $799.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 146934 RJN COMPUTER SERVICES,INC. $995.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 146935 TRW-REDI PROPERTY DATA $568.11 PROPERTY INDEXES 146936 REMEDYTEMP $11AD5.92 TEMPORARY PERSONNEL SERVICES 146937 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY ' $7,134.48 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 146938 REINES ENGINEERING CO. $5.623.00 BUILDING SUPPLIES W939 ROMAC SUPPLY COMPANY $605.95 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 146940 SANTA ANA RIVER FLOOD $1.100.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES 146941 BASCO ELECTRIC $3.307.00 ELECTRIC SERVICES 146942 R.CRAIG SCOTT&ASSOC. $7,756.69 LEGAL SERVICES-PERSONNEL ISSUES 146943 SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS,INC. $761.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE PAGE 5 , REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 09/06/95 POSTING DATE 09/06/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 146944 SETHI DIVIMET PROD. $639.76 PUMP PARTS 146945 SEWER EQUIPMENT OF FLORIDA $452.85 FITTINGS 146946 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $2,578.03 TOOLS 146947 SHURELUCK SALES $5,743.64 HARDWARE 146948 SIEVERS INSTRUMENTS.INC. $55.00 LAB SUPPLIES 146949 SKILL PATH,INC. $99.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING REGISTRATION 146950 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $4,259.53 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 146951 THE SMITH GROUP $9.498.30 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES-PERSONNEL 146952 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP. $193.95 TOOLS 146953 5O COAST AIR QUALITY $150.00 PERMIT FEES 146954 SOUTH COAST WATER $250.00 LAB SUPPLIES 146955 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. $71,437.08 POWER 146956 SO.CALIFORNIA MARINE INST. 5800.00 OCEAN MONITORING 146957 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. $24.249.49 DIESEUUNLEADED FUEL - 146958 STANG INDUSTRIAL PRODS. $7,111.50 OFFICE EQUIPMENT rn 146959 STATE STREET BANK $44.91 TRUSTEE SERVICES X 146960 SUMMIT STEEL $813.88 METAL ti 146961 SUNSET FORD $228.96 TRUCK PARTS U7 146962 SUPELCO,INC. $220.44 LABSUPPLIES 146963 SUPER ICE CORP. $76.25 LAB SUPPLIES 146964 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $223.22 ELECTRIC CART PARTS b0 146965 TAYLOR INDUSTRIAL SOFTWARE $5.485.03 COMPUTER SOFTWARE TRAINING 146966 TECHNICOMP $5,338.50 PUBLICATION 146967 TEKTRONIX,INC. $792.99 INSTRUMENT PARTS 146968 THEODORE ROBBINS FORD $2.909.24 VEHICLE RENTAL 146969 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $75.24 MECHANICAL PARTS 146970 TONY'S LOCK&SAFE SERVICE $212.89 LOCKS&KEYS 140971 TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY.INC. $3,973.84 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.0.5.11-94 146972 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $15262 TRUCK PARTS 146973 U.S.AUTO GLASS CENTERS $102.00 TRUCK PARTS 148974 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $264.50 LAB SUPPLIES 146975 UNISOURCEWOR BUTLER PAPER $329.68 OFFICE SUPPLIES 146978 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $507,34 PARCEL SERVICES 146977 VWR SCIENTIFIC $1.254.30 LAB SUPPLIES 146978 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $1,039.03 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 146979 VALLEY DETROIT DIESEL $381.28 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 146980 VERNE'S PLUMBING $110.00 PLUMBING SERVICES 146981 VERTEX TECHNOLOGIES,INC. $942.71 FIBER OPTIC SUPPLIES 146982 VILLAGE NURSERIES $570.94 LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES 146983 WATER ENVIRONMENT FED. $495.00 TECHNICAL SEMINAR REGISTRATION 146984 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $33,593.07 CAUSTIC SODA&HYPOCHLORIDE M.0.8-12-92&4-13.94 146985 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $473.18 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 146988 JUDITH A.WILSON $894.51 COBRA REIMBURSEMENT 146987 WITEG $393.29 LAB SUPPLIES 146988 ROURKE,WOODRUFF&SPRADLIN $109,272.54 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.2-19.92 146989 WOODWARD GOVERNOR CO. $21,01260 MACHINE REPAIRS 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID OW MIS POSTING DATE 0WIV95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR 146990 XEROX CORP. $5,400.11 COPIER LEASES 146991 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $13,949.65 LAB SUPPLIES 146992 RICHARD YOUNG PRODUCTS $281.89 OFFICE SUPPLIES TOTAL CAIMS PAID 09/06/95 1,915,961.00 SUMMARY AMOUNT 01 OPER FUND $9,568.37 #1 CONSTR FUND 4.56 #2 OPER FUND 33.596.87 02 CAP FAD FUND 181,566.38 m 02 CONSTR FUND 12.54 X _ #3 OPER FUND 130,491.82 #3 CAP FAC FUND 262,057.21 #3 CONSTR FUND 15.27 --I #5 OPER FUND 9.853.31 1A #6CONSTR FUND 5.264.67 I #5 CONSTR FUND 3.19 #7 OPER FUND 19,136.53 #7 CONSTR FUND 3.42 #11 OPER FUND 5,766.40 #11 CAP FAC FUND 2.195.00 #11 CONSTR FUND 5.93 #13 OPER FUND 1,266.10 #14 OPER FUND 59.01 #14 CAP FAC FUND 4,435.60 #596 OPER FUND 3,503.90 #6&7 OPER FUND 2,563.16 #7&14 OPER FUND 5,815.95 JT OPER FUND 599,246.29 CORE 369.101.55 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND 31,663.69 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL 241,663.58 $1.918.961.00 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING OCTOBER 25, 1995 Agenda Item (8): Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts (each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District). Summary See attached listing of claim payments. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of payment of claims listing. ��wvoo�asuc eswnas+om FUND NO 9199 - Jr DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/14M5 PAGE 1 0 -' REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 09/20/95 POSTING DATE 0920195 WARRANTNO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION - 147022 ACGIH,INC. $312.14 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 147023 AG TECH COMPANY $55,729.65 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 147024 ATM AA,INC. $4.485.00 LAB SERVICES 147025 AT&T-BUSINESS LONG DISTANCE SERVICE $S.00 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 147028 A-ZLOGICSYSTEMS $233.64 MACHINE REPAIRS 147027 ACCOUNTANTS OVERLOAD $220.50 TEMPORARY PERSONNEL SERVICES 147028 ACTION DOOR REPAIR CORP. $340.76 DOOR REPAIRS 147029 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS,INC. $445,687.81 CONSTRUCTION P1-35-1 147030 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS,INC. $4,800.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 147031 AIR COLD SUPPLY,INC. $164.74 AIR CONDITIONER REPAIRS 147032 AIR PRODUCTS B CHEMICALS $18.037.20 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.O.8.9-09 147033 ALLIED ELECTRONICS $106.54 INSTRUMENT PARTS 147034 AMERICAN PROTECTIVE SER.,INC. $1,252.34 CONTRACT SECURITY SERVICES 147035 AMERICAN SIGMA $1,119.52 LAB SUPPLIES 147036 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION $12.461.82 SEWER REPAIRS 147037 ANALYSTS,INC. $1,657.49 MECHANICAL PARTS 147038 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL $330.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 147039 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $2,626.12 NOTICES&ADS m 147040 APPLIED SIOSYSTEMS,INC. $1.376.35 LAB SUPPLIES X 147041 ABC LABORATORIES $3,830.OD LAB SERVICES 2 147042 AQUATIC BIOSYSTEMS.INC. $235.00 LAB SERVICES 147043 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT $1,268.50 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES .-+ 147W ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. $60.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL 147045 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $3,924.60 PAYROLL SERVICES y 147046 AWARDS B TROPHIES $162.79 PLAQUES I 147047 BKK LANDFILL $2,509.03 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 F� 147048 BANANA BLUEPRINT $4,223.40 PRINTING M.O.11-07.94 147049 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $1,929.29 BATTERIES 147050 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $4.275.31 LAB SUPPLIES 147051 BENZ ENGINEERING,INC. $270.95 COMPRESSOR PARTS 147052 WT BILLARD.INC. $249.60 BUILDING REPAIRS 147053 BID-GRO DIVISION $45,595.77 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.4-26-95 147054 BOOT BARN $113.03 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 147055 THE BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFFAIRS $1,411.53 HUMAN RESOURCES PUBLICATION 147066 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. $289.21 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 147057 C.L.TECHNOLOGY $720.00 GAS ANALYSIS SERVICES 147058 CS COMPANY $2,455.08 HARDWARE/PLUMBING SUPPLIES 147059 CALTEX PLASTICS,INC. $1.071.00 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 147060 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $1.755.86 OFFICE FURNITURE 147061 CENTURY SAFETY INST.&SUPPLY $8,186.93 SAFETY SUPPLIES 147052 CHEMICAL ENGINEERING $50.00 SUBSCRIPTION 147083 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $87.28 SERVICEAGREEMENT 147054 COLE-PALMER INSTRUMENT CO. $821.87 LAB SUPPLIES 147085 COUCH&SONS $323,189.50 CONSTRUCTION 11-17-1 147066 COMPUSERVE $246.28 COMPUTER SERVICES 147067 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $839.04 ELECTRIC PARTS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9114195 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 092D/95 POSTING DATE 09/20/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 147068 CONSUMER PIPE $918.69 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 147069 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC. $338.76 TOOLS 147070 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $1.249.28 ENGINE PARTS 147071 COUNTY CLERK $342.00 CEOA FEES 147072 COUNTY CLERK $36.00 CEOA FEES 147073 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $2.610.12 ELECTRIC PARTS 147074 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $4.084.00 STATE UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 147075 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $200.00 ANNEXATION FEE 147076 DAILY PILOT $144.00 NOTICES&ADS 147077 HSK/DECKER $404.91 INSTRUMENT PARTS 147070 DE GUELLE&SONS GLASS CO. $482.01 GLASS 147079 DELL COMPUTER CORP. $10,556.08 COMPUTER HARDWARE 147080 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIF. $47.435.78 DENTAL INSURANCE PLAN M.0dd2-94 147081 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $2.050.00 COMPUTER TRAINING 147082 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $940.00 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 147083 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $1,781.00 PAINT SUPPLIES 147084 DYCAM,INC. $1.505.40 COMPUTER PARTS 147085 ESP NORTH $2.070.52 SECURITY SUPPLIES m 147086 EASTMAN,INC. $991.83 OFFICE SUPPLIES = 147087 EMPIRE SCALES CO. $32.65 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 147088 ENCHANTER,INC. $3,500.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5-24.95 147089 ENVIROGEN,INC. $5.029.00 BIOTRICKLING FILTER PROJECT --1 147090 FMC CORPORATION $102,2114.91 HYDROGEN PEROXIDE M.O.944-94 147091 FST SAND AND GRAVEL,INC. $532.49 ROAD BASE MATERIALS n 147092 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $8,322.50 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 N 147093 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $501.00 AIR FREIGHT 147094 FISCHER&PORTER CO. $1,751.27 STRIP CHART PAPER 147095 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $2,317.40 LAB SUPPLIES 147096 FISIONS INSTRUMENTS $879.44 LAB SUPPLIES 147097 FLICKINGER CO. $1,637.96 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 147098 FLOSYSTEMS,INC. $8,964.88 PUMP PARTS 147099 FOSS MARITIME CO. $88.20 FREIGHT CHARGES 147100 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $154.87 PHOTO SUPPLIES 147101 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $321.23 PAINTSUPPLIES 147102 FOUR WHEEL PARTS WHOLESALER $339.73 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 147103 THE FOXBORO CO. $1,737.83 INSTRUMENT PARTS 147104 FRANCE COMPRESSOR PRODUCT $727.07 COMPRESSOR PARTS 147105 FRAZEE PAINT&WALCOVERING $189.10 PAINT SUPPLIES 147108 FRY'S ELECTRONICS $96.01 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 147107 GST,INC. $2,078.72 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1471BB GTE TELEPHONE OPERATIONS $12,053.00 RELOCATE TELEPHONE SYSTEM AT PLANT 147109 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $116.37 CHEMICALS 147110 GENERAL ALUMINUM FORGINGS $117.39 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 147111 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $3,898.80 ELECTRIC PARTS 147112 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $248.45 TELEPHONE SERVICES 147113 GENICOM CORPORATION $839.00 PRINTING SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9114195 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 09r2W95 POSTING DATE 09/20/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 147114 GIERUCH-MITCHELL,INC. $1,053.79 PUMP PARTS 147115 N.GLANTZ B SON,INC. $570.07 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 147118 GOLDEN BELL PRODUCTS $301.70 CLEANER 147117 GRAPHIC CONTROLS $235.48 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 147118 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $229.38 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 147119 GRASSY S.T.I. $2,497.85 ENGINE PARTS 147120 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $1,678.99 PRINTING 147121 DGA CONSULTANTS $11,343.49 ENGINEERING SERVICES 3.35R 147122 DAVID R.GRIFFIN $175,033.02 LEGAL SERVICES-TECHRE PIPE M.O.9-14-94 147123 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $1,037.64 TRUCK PARTS 147124 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $487.74 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 147125 PL HAWN CO,INC. $6,403.58 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 147126 HELPMATES PERSONNEL SERVICES $1,151.20 TEMPORARY PERSONNEL SERVICES 147127 HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT $2,083.33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN. 147128 HEWLETT PACKARD CO. $3,496.50 SERVICE AGREEMENT 147129 HILT],INC. $839.05 FITTINGS 147130 RC HOFFMAN AND/OR ISCO SI00.17 MACHINE REPAIRS 147131 HOME DEPOT $233.65 HARDWARE Tn 147132 IRS HUGHES CO,INC. $790.70 SIGNS = 147133 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $1,178.25 WATER USE W 147134 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $22.036.13 PERMIT FEES 147135 HYCLONE LABORATORIES $733.63 LAB SUPPLIES -4 147136 IPCO SAFETY $8,200.98 SAFETY SUPPLIES D 147137 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $98,610.35 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11-18-92 I 147138 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $807.90 CONNECTORS W 147139 INTUITIVE TECHNOLOGY $16,195.00 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 147140 J2 PRINTING SERVICES $604.48 PRINTING 147141 AT COMPUTER SOURCE,INC. $3,025.62 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 147142 JAMISON ENGINEERING,INC. $1,362.34 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 147143 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY. $357.06 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 1471" JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO. $1,001.20 GAUGE 147145 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $154.18 ELECTRIC PARTS 147146 JONES CHEMICALS,INC. $16.261.35 CHEMICALS 147147 KALLEEN'S COMPUTER PRODUCTS $175.01 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 147148 KING BEARING,INC. $304.86 MACHINE SUPPLIES 147149 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $161.48 HARDWARE 147150 L A CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $383.27 SERVICE AGREEMENTS 147151 LAWICRANDAL,INC. $1.675.00 SOIL TESTING 7.13.94 147152 LIMITORQUE CORP. $819.66 ELECTRIC REPAIRS 147153 THE LITIGATION GROUP $6,609.56 POST-TRIAL INTERVIEW-TECHRE PIPE 147154 LOCAL AGENCY $500.00 ANNEXATION FEES 147155 MPS $26.83 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 147156 MACOMCO 5464A0 SERVICE AGREEMENT 147157 MANDIC MOTORS $149.00 TOYING SERVICES 147158 MANHOLE ADJUSTING $7,900.00 MANHOLE ADJUSTING SERVICES 147159 MANLEYS BOILER REPAIR CO,INC. $978.75 BOILER REPAIRS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9114195 PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 092W95 POSTING DATE 0920M WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 147160 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $66.23 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 147161 MASONEILAN N.AMER,OPERATIONS $3,553.60 INSTRUMENT PARTS 147162 MCMAHAN DESK,INC. $1,139A6 OFFICE FURNITURE 147163 MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. $1,407.44 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 147164 MICRO MOTION $5,186,36 INSTRUMENT PARTS 147165 MICROBIAL INSIGHTS,INC. $150.00 CONSULTING SERVICES M.0.11-18-92 147165 MICROBICS CORPORATION $856.08 OCEAN MONITORING 147167 MIDWAY MFG.&MACHINING $7,370.97 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 147160 MINNESOTA WESTERN VISUAL PRIES. $557.69 LAB SUPPLIES 147189 MISSION ABRASIVE SUPPLIES $553.20 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 147170 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3,848.97 UNIFORM RENTALS 147171 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO. $861.00 ELECTRIC PARTS 147172 MONITOR LABS $931.32 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 147173 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $380.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES 147174 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $674.80 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 147175 NEUTRON $7,014.50 ANIONIC POLYMER M.O.8-10-94 147176 NEW HORIZONS COMPUTER CENTER $4,800.00 COMPUTER TRAINING CLASSES 147177 NICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY $306.71 INDUSTRIAL GREASE X 147178 OFFICE PAVILIONSANTERIOR RESOURCES $599.09 OFFICE FURNITURE REPAIRS = 147179 OLE LEE,INC. $69.27 TRUCK PARTS 147180 OMEGA CORP. $375.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT .y 147181 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $7,400.44 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES -1 147182 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. $472.30 LAB SUPPLIES n 147183 OXYGEN SERVICE $2,737.21 SPECIALTY GASES I 147104 COUNTY OF ORANGE $401.50 PERMIT FEES 147185 PSI $117.06 HARDWARE 147186 PSSI $3.280.95 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION 147187 PACIFIC CLIPPINGS $126.70 NEWSPAPER CLIPPING SERVICES 147188 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $5.925.79 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 147189 PACIFIC PARTS $5,677.09 INSTRUMENT PARTS 147190 PACIFIC BELL 543.18 TELEPHONE SERVICES 147191 PAGENET $991.21 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 147192 PAINE WEBBER $42,020.63 COP REMARKETING FEES 147193 PAK WEST $1,376.18 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 147194 PARTS UNLIMITED $609.12 TRUCK PARTS 147195 PENINSULA PUMP CORP. $4,978.05 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 147196 PERMA SEAL $182.69 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 147197 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $5,484.94 REIMB.PETTY CASH,TRAINING&TRAVEL 147198 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $120,395.70 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3.29-95 147199 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS $315.72 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 147200 POLYPURE,INC. $22,416.41 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92 147201 POTTORFF COMPANY $64.53 ELECTRIC PARTS 147202 POWER SYSTEMS TESTING CO. 51,249.99 ELECTRICAL TESTING 147203 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $160.00 ICE 147204 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE IND. $2,280.00 SOILTESTING - 147205 PUBLIC SECTOR EXCELLENCE $6.O00.0O TRAINING CATALOG DEVELOPMENT&PRODUCTION FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/14/95 PAGE 5 -• REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0MW% POSTING DATE 09MMS WARRANTNO. VENDOR AMOUNT 147206 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $410.69 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS 147207 R&R INSTRUMENTS $2,496.36 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 147208 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $2.062.75 TRASH REMOVAL 147209 RED WING SHOES $206.88 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 147210 REMEDYTEMP $2,490.84 TEMPORARY PERSONNEL SERVICES 147211 RM MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL $236.43 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 147212 ST ANDREWS MACHINE CO. $86.20 MACHINE REPAIRS 147213 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS 5975.50 ELECTRIC PARTS 147214 SANTA AMA PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL $2,221.43 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 147215 SANTA FE BAG CO. $297A5 OPERATING SUPPLIES 147216 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $551SB SPECIALTY GASES 147217 SEA COAST DESIGNS $3,012,23 OFFICE EOUIPMENT 147218 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $1.833.58 HARDWARE 147219 SHURELUCK SALES $60.85 HARDWARE 147220 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO. $132.37 LAB SUPPLIES 147221 SKILL PATH,INC. $359.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING REGISTRATION 147222 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $250.12 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 147223 M.LEE SMITH PUBLISHERS&ASSOC. $387.00 CA SAFETY&HEALTH MONITOR SUBSCRIPTION XRl 147224 SNAP-ON/SUN CORP. $1,521.37 INSTRUMENT S 147225 SO COAST AIR QUALITY $150.00 PERMIT FEES 147226 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY $1,315.60 PERMIT FEES .. 147221 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. $10,553.02 POWER -I 147228 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $2,783.07 NATURAL GAS n 147229 SO.CALIF.WATER CO. $54.65 WATER USE 1 147230 SOUTH SHORE $3,093.33 WINDOW WASHING SERVICES 147231 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER $2,929.34 DRINKING WATERICOOLER RENTALS 147232 WESTALLOY,INC. $463.97 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 147233 SPECIALIZED PRODUCTS CO. $1,090.91 TOOLS 147234 SPECTRON&ASSOCIATES $308.26 LAB SUPPLIES 147235 STERLINGART $90.99 OFFICE SUPPLIES 147236 SUPELCO,INC. $168.65 LAB SUPPLIES 147237 SUPERB ONE-HOUR PHOTO $11.31 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 147238 SUPER CHEM CORP. $406.82 CHEMICALS 147239 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $680A2 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 147240 TEKMAR COMPANY $700.86 LAB SUPPLIES 147241 TEL-A-TRAIN,INC. $196.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING REGISTRATION 147242 TELE-CELL,INC. $1,626.25 TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT 147243 THOMAS BROS MAPS 54,000.00 PRINTING 147244 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $497.15 MECHANICAL PARTS 147245 TONER SYSTEM INTERNATIONAL $1.400.21 PRINTING SUPPLIES 147246 TONY'S LOCK&SAFE SERVICE $82.56 LOCKS&KEYS 147247 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE,INC. $644.35 SAFETY SUPPLIES 147248 TREBOR ELECTRONICS $682.68 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 147249 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $216.84 TRUCK PARTS 147250 TRUESDAIL LABS $6,587.00 LAB SERVICES 147251 JG TUCKER&SON,INC. $28.32 INSTRUMENT PARTS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/14/95 PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 092WOS POSTING DATE 092W95 WARRANTNO. VENDOR 147252 20TH CENTURY INSURANCE CO. $3,369.27 LIABILITY CLAIM 147253 U.S.AUTO GLASS CENTERS $70.31 TRUCK PARTS 147254 US RENTALS $13500 RENTAL EOUIPMENT 147255 UNISOURCEB/OR BUTLER PAPER $336.40 OFFICE SUPPLIES 147256 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $500.42 PARCEL SERVICES 147257 VWR SCIENTIFIC $627.03 LAB SUPPLIES 147258 VALLEY CRIES SUPPLY CO. $3.314.87 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 147259 VARIABLE SPEED DRIVES $1,495.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS 147260 VARIAN ASSOCIATES.INC. $685.06 LAB SUPPLIES 147261 WEFTEC'95 $605.00 BIOSOLIDS RECYCLING CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 147262 WACKENHUT CORP. $1,038.75 SECURITY SERVICES 147263 WAL-CON CONSTRUCTION CO. $121.328.87 CONSTRUCTION 5-37-3 147264 WARRINGTON $115.00 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS 147265 WATERS CORPORATION $8.459.48 LAB SUPPLIES 147256 WAXIE $1.067.85 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 147267 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $11,280.15 CAUSTIC SODA&HYPOCHLORIDE M.O.8-12-9254-13-94 147268 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. 5988.55 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 147269 XEROX CORP. $1.074.09 COPIER LEASES m 147270 YELLOW SPRINGS INSTRUMENT CO. $54.74 INSTRUMENT PARTS X 147271 JOHNSON YOKOGAWA CORP. $2.373.69 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 2 tv TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 920/95 12.090.326.08 a D, FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/14/95 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID D920/95 POSTING DATE 0W0195 WARRANT NO. VENDOR SUMMARY _ AMOUNT #1 CONSTR FUND 38,317.55 #2 OPER FUND 33.50 #2 CONSTR FUND 14,209.03 03 OPER FUND 37,355.15 93 CAP FAC FUND 182,849A3 #3 CONSTR FUND 14,032.44 #5 OPER FUND 16,024.16 #5 CAP FAC FUND 14.41 #5 CONSTR FUND 2,172.50 #6 CONSTR FUND 1,232.01 07 OPER FUND 4,620.15 97 CAP FAC FUND 579.72 #7 CONSTR FUND 2,126.09 #11 OPER FUND 10,676.78 m #11 CAP FAC FUND 324.080.55 2 #11 CONSTR FUND 1,526.31 413 CONSTR FUND 47.18 W #14 CAP FAC FUND 1.675.00 014 CONSTR FUND 2777.52 #536 CAP FAC FUND 121,382.77 A JT OPER FUND 620,187.44 v CORE 560,310.76 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND 52.888.38 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL 115,727.22 $2,090,326.06 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 09/26N5 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10N4/95 POSTING DATE 10NN95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 147292 A-1 FENCE CO INC. $630.00 GATE REPAIR 147293 ACWA/SALARY SURVEY §120.D0 SALARY B BENEFITS SURVEY 147294 AG TECH COMPANY §56 09.93 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 147295 ASL CONSULTING ENGINEERS $1,807.50 ATWOOD SUBTRUNK PLAN PREPARATION 147296 ATM AA.INC. $150.00 LAB SERVICES 147297 AT&T-CELLULAR CR BR $1.87 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 147298 ACADEMIC PRESS $356.05 PUBLICATIONS 147299 ACCUSLUDGE $480.99 LAB SUPPLIES 147300 ADVANCED COOLING TECHNOLOGY $243.41 ELECTRICPARTS 147301 AIR LIOUIDE AMERICA CORP. $2.245.00 SPECIALTY GASSES 147302 ALHAMBRA FOUNDRY CO LTD $3,769.10 MANHOLE FRAMES&COVERS 147303 ASCE CONTINUING EDUCATION $402.50 SAFETY VIDEO PROGRAM 147304 AMERIDATA $851.23 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 147305 AMERICAN METAL BEARING CO $1,038.75 BEARINGS 147306 AMERICAN PROTECTIVE SERVICE,INC. §328.40 SECURITY SERVICE 147307 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION $5.229.25 SEWER REPAIRS 147308 BLAKE PANDERSON $171.85 CELLULAR PHONE REIMBURSEMENT 1473D9 ANIXTER-DISTRIBUTION $1,298.02 COMPUTER SUPPLIES hl 147310 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $1,702.88 NOTICES&ADS x 147311 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $952.45 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 2 147312 ABC LABORATORIES §7,795.00 LAB SERVICES 147313 ARMOR-VAC $1,680.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 147314 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE.INC. §8,208.00 TOXIC WASTE REMOVAL 147315 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. $50.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL 147316 ASSOCIATED CONCRETE PRODUCTS $174.56 BUILDING MATERIALS 147317 ATKIN/JONES COMPUTER SERVICE $321.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT 147318 AWARDS B TROPHIES $14.09 PLAQUES 147319 BFI MEDICAL WASTE SYSTEMS §4.00 WASTE DISPOSAL 147320 BANCROFT-WHITNEY CO.. 11139.00 PUBLICATION 147321 BATTERY SPECIALTIES §120.25 BATTERIES 147322 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $3.317.73 LAB SUPPLIES 147323 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $431.30 TRUCK WASH TICKETS 147324 BIG-GRO DIVISION E52.443.84 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 4.26-95 147325 BLAIR-MARTIN CO,INC. §513.13 VALVE MANIFOLDS 147326 BOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE $468.70 TRUCK REPAIRS 147327 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $17.035.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7.18 147328 BUDGET JANITORIAL $3.330.00 JANITORIAL SERVICES MO 1-1244 147329 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. 552.14 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 147330 BUSH&ASSOCIATES,INC. E15.332.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.&8.94 147331 CALFON CONSTRUCTION $28,839.67 CONSTRUCTION 7-22&7-24 147332 CALTROL,INC. $1.965.26 HARDWARE 147333 CALIFORNIA AUTO COLLISION,INC. $1.198.08 TRUCK BODY REPAIR 147334 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $1,450.87 SERVICE AGREEMENT 147335 CDS MOVING EQUIPMENT $320.02 PLASTIC TOTE BOXES 147336 CAMALI CORP. $400.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 147337 CANUS CORPORATION 538,378.38 FIBEROPTICCABLE FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 09Q895 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 1001/95 POSTING DATE 10M"5 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 147338 CARLETON ENGINEERS $1,260.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES-AIR QUALITY 147339 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $10,964.79 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-38,J-33 147340 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $275.11 OFFICE FURNITURE 147341 CENTURY SAFETY INST.B SUPPLY $4.199.08 SAFETY SUPPLIES 147342 CERFNET $32.50 COMPUTER SERVICES 147343 CHROME CRANKSHAFT,INC. $960.00 PUMP PARTS 147344 CLEMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL $14,708.05 CONSULTANT-LANDFILL PROJECT M07.31-95 147345 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $153.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 147346 COASTALMOTION $1,332-00 SEMI-ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP FEE 147347 COLE-PALMER INSTRUMENT CO. $150.69 LAB SUPPLIES 147348 COMPUSA,INC. $678.83 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 147349 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $5,447.40 ELECTRIC PARTS 147350 CONSUMER PIPE $1,384.43 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 147351_ CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC. $977.81 TOOLS 147352 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $2.235.59 ENGINE PARTS 147353 COUNTERPART ENTERPRISES $1,497.04 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 147354 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $514.02 ELECTRIC PARTS 147355 D.T.I. $50.00 CHEMICALS m 147356 DE GUELLE&SONS GLASS CO $30100 SAFETY GLASS X 147357 DEZURIK AND/OR CS CO. $4,521.19 VALVES 147350 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $8.109.33 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 147359 DISPOSABLE WASTE SYS.B OR JWC ENVIRONMENTAL $244.31 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 147360 ESP NORTH $112.81 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 147361 EASTMAN,INC. - $2,706.62 OFFICE SUPPLIES 147362 EDWARDS DIV.OF GS BLDG SYS. $62.35 SERVICE AGREEMENT N 147363 EMERGENCY MGMT NETWORK $520.00 CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING 147364 ENCHANTER,INC. $4.200.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5.24-95 147365 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $1.011.70 LAB SERVICES 147366 FST SAND AND GRAVEL,INC. $769.35 ROAD BASE MATERIALS 147357 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $60.00 AIR FREIGHT 147368 FIBERTRON $1.192.01 FIBER OPTIC CABLE 147369 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $151.21 FILTERS 147370 FIRST CHOICE $389.84 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT 147371 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $101.42 LAB SUPPLIES 147372 FISONS INSTRUMENTS $11,527.36 SERVICE AGREEMENT 147373 CLIFFORD A FORKERT $826.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6894 147374 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $7.62 PHOTO SUPPLIES 147375 FREEDOM IMAGING $89.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 147376 FRY'S ELECTRONICS $8,450.05 ELECTRONIC&COMPUTER SUPPLIES 147377 GST,INC. $210.38 OFFICE SUPPLIES 147378 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $1,670.25 LUMBER/HARDWARE 147379 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $8,696A2 TELEPHONE SERVICES 147380 GIERLICH-MITCHELL,INC. $7.110.12 PUMP PARTS 147381 BEVERLY MAY GILLOIM $395.18 PAYROLL DEDUCTION REIMBURSEMENT 147382 GOVT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOC. $55.00 PUBLICATIONS 147383 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $1.077.29 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0912B195 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10IMS POSTING DATE 10/04/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 147384 GRASSY S.T.I. $857.00 ENGINE PARTS 147385 DGA CONSULTANTS $10,707.77 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.641-94 147386 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. S429.03 TRUCK PARTS 147387 HACH COMPANY $2.939.22 LAB SUPPLIES 147388 HATCH&KIRK INC. $309.69 TRUCK PARTS 147389 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS $4.055.00 CONTAINER RENTALS 147390 HELPMATES PERSONNEL SERVICES $1,036.08 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 147391 HEWLETTPACKARD $53.88 SERVICE AGREEMENT 147392 HOLMES B NARVER,INC. $36.972.96 ENGINEERING SERVICES MO 9.14-94 147393 HOME DEPOT $84.62 HARDWARE 147394 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $665.90 PAINT SUPPLIES 147395 IPCO SAFETY $3.465.49 SAFETY SUPPLIES 147396 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $79.552.98 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.OA 1.18-92 147397 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $1.080.25 CONNECTORS 147398 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. $571.01 TRUCK PARTS 147399 CLEAN AIR REPORT $565.00 PUBLICATION 147400 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $573.82 BATTERIES 147401 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT 567.02 WATER USEAGE m 147402 J2 PRINTING SERVICES $321.10 PRINTING X 147403 JAMES INSTRUMENTS,INC. $1.527.00 ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT 147404 JAMISON ENGINEERING $1,588.98 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES lA 147405 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY. $203.86 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 1474M KENNEDY HYDRAULICS $431.69 MOTOR REPAIRS 147407 KING BEARING,INC. $4.933.03 MACHINE SUPPLIES tz 147408 KLEINFELDER $1.552.95 GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTING SERVICES W 147409 KNOX INDUSTRULL SUPPLIES $5.755.50 TOOLS 147410 LASERALL CORP. $1.034.81 PRINTER REPAIR 147411 LEE B RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC. $5.297.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES 147412 JAMES E.LENIHAN COMPANY $12,700.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 147413 LEWCO ELECTRIC $77.27 TRUCK PARTS 147414 LIMRORQUE CORP. $2,883.19 ELECTRIC PARTS 147415 SOCO-LYNCH CORP $117.58 JANITORIAL SERVICES 147416 MACOMCO $464.10 SERVICE AGREEMENT 147417 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $285.268.00 CONSTRUCTION P242-2 147418 MCKENNA ENGR.8 EQUIP. $272.46 PUMP PARTS 147419 MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. $903.78 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 147420 MIDWAY MFG.B MACHINING $225.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 147421 MISSION INDUSTRIES $4,601.30 UNIFORM RENTALS 147422 MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION $38.369.36 CONSTRUCTION Mi-IA 147423 MORELAND B ASSOCIATES $15,843.50 AUDITING SERVICES MO 3-5-95 147424 MORTON SALT $416.57 SALT 147425 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION $461,76 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL FEE 147426 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $70.35 SAFETY FILM RENTALS 147427 NEUTRON $5.254.08 ANIONIC POLYMER M.O.8-10.94 147428 NEW HORIZONS COMPUTER CENTERS,INC. S4,800.00 SOFTWARE TRAINING CLASSES 147429 NICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY $1.514.76 LUBRICANTS/DIESEL FUEL FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 09/2895 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10/04/96 POSTING DATE 10/04/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 147430 NORTEL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS SST53 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS 147431 OI CORPORATION $671.90 LAB SUPPLIES 147432 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $452.79 SAFETY GLASSES 147433 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION . $7.18 OFFICE SUPPLIES 147434 ORACLE CORPORATION $14,287.65 SOFTWARE 147435 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL $1,420.73 CHEMICALS 147436 ORANGE COUNTY FARM SUPPLY $852.35 CHEMICALS 147437 ORANGE COURIER $96.60 COURIER SERVICES 147438 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. $575.76 FITTINGS 147439 OXYGEN SERVICE $1,283.70 SPECIALTY GASES 147440 COUNTY OF ORANGE $735.00 - USER FEE CHANGE PROCESSING 147441 CSDOC WORKERS COMP INSURANCE ACCOUNT $2,145.89 WORKERS COMPENSATION REIMBURSEMENT 147442 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $1,259.95 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 147443. PACIFIC PARTS $26.260.58 INSTRUMENT PARTS 147444 PACIFIC BELL $1,354.18 TELEPHONE SERVICES 147445 PASCAL&LUDWIG,INC. $51,191.00 CONSTRUCTION PI-38.2 147446 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $7,890.77 REIMS.PETTY CASH,TRAINING&TRAVEL 147447 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $107.365.50 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3-29-95 f+T 147448 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS $22,750.00 CONSULTING SERVICE X 147449 PIINEY BOWES $83.69 POSTAGE METER TAPE 147450 - POLYMETRICS,INC. $1,262.75 LABSUPPLIES Cd 147451 POLYPURE,INC. 534,023.88 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3.11-92 _I 147452 POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO. SSS0A0 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 147453 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE - $160.00 ICE FOR SAMPLES 147454 PROMINENT FLUID CONTROL,INC. $799.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL r 147455 REISH MARINE STUDIES,INC. $960.00 OCEAN MONITORING 147456 RELIANCE ELECTRIC $1.575.82 ELECTRIC PARTS 147457 REMEDYTEMP $1.830.40 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 147458 RM MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL AND/OR RITTAL $169.63 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 147459 ROSEMOUNT ANALYTICAL,INC. S868A2 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 147460 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS $487.75 ELECTRIC PARTS 147461 SANTA FIE BAG CO. $243.11 FREIGHT 147462 SANWA BANK $9.086.42 CONSTRUCTION 14AAA 147463 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INT'L $221,921.12 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-8-94 147464 R.CRAIG SCOTT&ASSOC. $8.922.40 LEGAL SERVICES-PERSONNEL ISSUES 147465 SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS,INC. 8232.00 LAB REPAIRS 147456 SELCO PRODUCTS CO. $413.58 METER CONNECTOR 147467 SENTIENT SYSTEMS,INC. $10,800.00 FACILITATOR SERVICES-EXECUTIVE RETREAT 147468 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $46.11 TOOLS 147469 SHURELUCK SALES $2,724.55 TOOLSMARDWARE 147470 SMITH-EMERY CO. $405.00 SOIL TESTING M.0.7-13-94 147471 WALTER SMITH&ASSOCIATES $899.00 EMMISSIONS WORKSHOP 147472 SOUTH COAST WATER $160.00 LAB SUPPLIES 147473 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. $70.765.05 POWER 147474 SO.CAL GAS.CO. $2,183.29 NATURAL GAS 147475 STAMEN Z.SPASSOFF P.E. $12,BD0.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19-2 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0928MS PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10/04/95 POSTING DATE 10/04/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 447476 SPECIAL PLASTIC SYSTEMS,INC. $110.71 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 1474T7 SPECIALIZED PRODUCTS CO. $110.03 OFFICE TOOLS 147478 SPIDERS PAPER $85.10 OFFICE SUPPLIES 147479 SUMMIT STEEL 9339.41 METAL 147490 TEKTRONIX,INC. $1,285.71 INSTRUMENT PARTS 147481 TELEDYNE ANALYTICAL $153.31 INSTRUMENT PARTS 147482 THEODORE ROBBINS FORD $2,909.24 VEHICLE RENTAL-SUMMER PROGRAM 147483 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $1.462.89 MECHANICAL PARTS 147484 TONYS LOCK 9 SAFE SERVICE $90.63 LOCKS&KEYS 147485 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $74.01 TRUCK PARTS 147486 TRUESDAIL LABS $150.00 LAB SERVICES 147487 JG TUCKER B SON,INC. $3,291.18 INSTRUMENT PARTS 147488 USA BLUE BOOK $358.34 PUBLICATION 147489 UNISOURCEWOR BUTLER PAPER $442.61 OFFICE SUPPLIES 147490 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $5161 PARCEL SERVICES 147491 UNITED VAN LINES,INC. $8,584.80 RELOCATION SERVICES 147492 VWR SCIENTIFIC $998.53 LAB SUPPLIES 147493 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $2.33 PLUMBING SUPPLIES m 147494 VALLEY DETROIT DIESEL $1,153.46 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES X 147495 VERNES PLUMBING $265.00 PLUMBING SERVICES 147496 VERTEX SYSTEMS $1,83&00 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT CO 147497 WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION $257A5 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT COURSES 147498 WAXIE $5.533.70 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 147499 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $10,970.50 CAUSTIC SODA 8 HYPOCHLORIDE M.O.8-12-92 8 4-13-94 LA 147500 ROURKE.WOODRUFF 8 SPRADLIN $124,885.82 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.2-19-92 147501 YELLOW SPRINGS INSTRUMENT CO. $6179 LAB SUPPLIES 147502 RICHARD YOUNG PRODUCTS $418.29 INSTRUMENT PARTS TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 10/04/95 $1,694,367.04 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 09/26/95 PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID IQM4196 POSTIN0DATEID/04/9S SUMMARY AMOUNT #1 OPER FUND $225.00 02 OPER FUND $3.725.95 02 CAP PAC FUND $35.780.46 03 OPER FUND $34.380.66 #3 CAP FAC FUND $46.873.04 #5 OPER FUND $11.616.76 07 OPER FUND $6.135.01 #7 CAP FAC FUND $55,867.56 011 OPER FUND $861.43 #11 CAP FAC FUND $16,000.45 #14 OPER FUND $762.17 #14 CAP FAC FUND $47,688.68 0596 OPER FUND $2.741.59 #S86 CAP FAC FUND $1.354.37 #897 OPER FUND $2,930.72 #7&14 OPER FUND $5.643.39 JT GRER FUND $797.137.03 CORF $461,766.16 m SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND - $25.857.34 X 2 Jr DIST WORKING CAPITAL E135,017.29 w $1.694,367.04 lb FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKINO CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10AIM PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10/0MS POSTING DATE 10MRS WARRANTING. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 147503 ACORN CONSULTING $1.430.00 CONSULTING SERVICES $1.430.00 SUMMARY AMOUNT JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $1,430.00 E7,430.00 m x x I" tv V v JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING OCTOBER 25, 1995 Agenda Item (9)(a) Consideration of the following actions relative to the Purchase of Three Cab and Chassis with Crane Mounted Service Body, Specification No. V-008 (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter dated September 28, 1995, from Maurice J. Sopp Truck Center, apparent low bidder, requesting that they be allowed to withdraw their bid for said purchase due to a miscalculation and approving said request (2) Consideration of motion receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding purchase order for Purchase of Three Cab and Chassis with Crane Mounted Service Body, Specification No. V-008, to Mike McCarthy Buick & GMC Truck, for the amount not to exceed $124,346.37, plus sales tax. Summary Sealed bids were received on September 19, 1995, for the Purchase of Three Cab and Chassis with Crane Mounted Service Body, Specification No, V-008. Ten bids were received. The low bid was$124,346.37, and the high bid was$134,559.18, plus sales tax. One lower bid was received from Maurice J. Sopp Truck Center for a total amount of$60,519.06, The supplier miscalculated his quotation and has requested in writing to have his bid withdrawn from consideration. Staff recommends the bid from Maurice J. Sopp Truck Center be rejected as requested. The three new vehicles will be designated as follows: CITY. DIVISION DESCRIPTION Two 3330 These trucks will be assigned to the Plant Plant Maintenance Maintenance Division replacing two 1973 Dodges with 82,600 and 52,900 miles,which will be sent to auction. Bodies are completely rusted out and parts are no longer available. One 3340 This truck will be used for maintenance on limited Collection hard-to-access outlying pump stations, and for standby personnel to tarty necessary spill response equipment needed for sanitary sewer overflows. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends award of Purchase of Three Cab and Chassis with Crane Mounted Service Body, Specification No. V-008, be made to Mike McCarthy Buick&GMC Truck, the lowest responsible bidder, in the amount of$124,346.37, plus sales tax. Sufficient funds are in the 1995-95 Fiscal Year Budget to cover this acquisition. G1w URC"GENGAnMWGPS074M MAUwce a. S AND Son u 6400 SO.ATLANTIC BOULEVARD `� � �� BELL,CALIFORNIA 90201-2597 8eLF8 AIlo8GVICE—M 19u (213) S62.8600 Mailing Address: Post Office Box 311 Bell,CA 90201-0091 CO. SANITATION OF ORANGE CO. DIST. , CALIF. 9-20-95 P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIF. 92708 ATTN PENNY KYLE RE: BID #V-008 DEAR PENNY: PLEASE ALLOW SOPP TRUCK CENTER TO WITHDRAW OUR BID PROPOSAL THAT WE SUBMITTED ON 9-19-95 AT 11:00 A.M. FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS WE FORGOT TO ADD THE PRICE OF THE SPECIAL UTILITY BODY THAT WAS REQUIRED AS A PACKAGE. IT WAS AN ERROR THAT WE OBVIOUSLY CAUGHT AFTER THE OPENING. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME AT (213) 562-8614 LY, R CHARD PEREZ U FLEET SALES ' September 28, 1995 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS Al ORANGE COUNTY. CAUFORNIA - MEMORANDUM _ v 10844 ELLIS GVENuf vo FBUNT<IN vell EY CALIFORNIA 9272BA127 Box B121 , TO: Edwin E. Hodges, Director of Maintenance 11.1 ye2.2411 FROM: Katherine Yarosh, Senior Buyer SUBJECT: Purchase of Three Cab and Chassis with Crane Mounted Service Body Specification No V-008 Sealed bids were opened September 19, 1995, for the Purchase of Three Cab and Chassis with Crane Mounted Service Body, Specification No V-008. Tabulation of bids is as follows: COMPANY TOTAL PRICE Mike McCarthy GMC Truck Westminster, CA $124.346.37 Fuller Ford Chula Vista, CA $125,253.00 Pacific Empire Volvo GMC Riverside, CA $125.607.00 Nicholas Chevrolet Garden Grove, CA $125.916.45 Carmenita Truck Center Santa Fe Springs, CA $128,034.00 Victor Buick GMC Truck Corona, CA $128,544,00 Bell PontfacIGMC El Monte, CA $128,700.00 George Chevrolet Bellflower, CA $130,260,00 Downey Ford Downey, CA $134.559.18 Maurice J. Sopp Truck Center Huntington Park, CA $60,519.06 ' ' The supplier miscalculated his quotation and has requested in writing to have his bid withdrawn from consideration. Staff recommends award of Purchase of Three Cab and Chassis with Crane Mounted Service Body, Specification No. V-008, be made to Mike McCarthy Buick& GMC Truck, Westminster, the lowest responsible bidder in the amount of$124,346.37, plus sales tax. Approved by: f / A . Ted Hoffman, Purchasing Manager G:1W PIPURCHIHELLERSIDSAGP5074.95 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING OCTOBER 25, 1995 Agenda Item (9)(b): Consideration of the following actions regarding the transportation and disposal of residual solids. (1) Consideration of motion to approve a contract extension with Falcon Disposal Services, Inc. (Falcon)for transportation of residual solids for disposal, for a six-month period beginning October 30, 1995, for the existing contract unit price of$260.00 per load for grit and screening and $12.08 per ton for sludge; and authorizing the General Manager to execute said agreement. The estimated cost for the six-month period is $100,000. (2) Consideration of motion to approve a contract extension with BKK Corporation (BKK) for disposal of residual solids for a six-month period beginning October 30, 1995, for the existing contract unit price of$31.38 per ton for grit, screenings, and sludge; and authorizing the General Manager to execute said agreement. The estimated cost for the six-month period is $65,000. Summary The Districts wastewater treatment process begins with separating solids from the wastewater in the headworks area of the treatment facilities. Material removed by the barscreen (called screenings) and material removed by the grit chambers (called grit) is currently disposed of at the BKK Corporation landfill in the City of Covina. Falcon Disposal Services, Inc. (Falcon) is the hauling company that currently transports the residual material to the point of disposal (the BKK landfill). The Districts currently send approximately two loads of grit and screenings material to BKK each day and about 100 tons of cleaning bed sludge per month. The current contracts with Falcon and BKK expire on October 29, 1995. BKK has recently notified the Districts of the pending closure of its Covina facility in mid-1996 and staff is requesting the extension while it is considering alternatives. Districts staff is currently initiating screenings research, a literature search and intend to develop a Request for Proposal to bid alternative disposal methods. A Proposal for Extension from Falcon was received on October 11, 1995 for transporting grit, screenings and sludge to the BKK landfill for the six month period beginning October 30, 1995. Falcon proposes to extend at the current prices for said period. The estimated cost for the contract period is $100,000. A Proposal for Extension from BKK was received on October 11, 1995, for disposal of grit, screenings and sludge to the BKK landfill in the City of Covina for the six month period beginning October 30, 1995. BKK proposes to extend at the current contract prices. The estimated cost for the six-month contract period is $65,000. Staff Recommendation 1. Staff recommends award of a contract extension to Falcon Disposal Services, Inc. for transportation of residual solids for disposal for a six-month period, beginning October 30, 1995, for the existing contract unit price of$260.00 per load for grit and screening and $12.08 per ton for sludge; and authorizing the General Manager to execute an agreement. The estimated contract cost for the six-month period is $100,000. 2. Staff recommends award of a contract extension to BKK Corporation for disposal of residual solids for a six-month period, beginning October 30, 1995, for the existing contract unit price of $31.38 per ton for grit, screenings, and sludge; and authorizing the General Manager to execute an agreement. The estimated contract cost for the six-month period is $65,000. Report By: Esouer JAWPD0CSSVG9M0CTM1009s Dept.Head Approval: Doan OCT 12 '� 0223 CRcFJ:-IE1D QiJIRO P.1 1 � 6R�4Y76CG'YNah7faYL0! October 12, 1885 Sent Vla Fax # (714) 855-0728 Ms. Kethehne Yarosh Senior Buyer ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108" Ells Fountain Valley, California 82708-7018 Re: Agreement between County Sanitation Districts of Orange County and Falcon Disposal for Transportation of Residuals Solids AW Dear Katherine: Plesae be advised that our company agrees to extend the above referenced contract for a period of six months at the current contract rates. It Is understood that the BKK Landfill has agreed to Wend their contract in conjunction with this extension. We will look forward to reviewing the Impending RFP we discussed during our telephone conversation. Sincerely, GREENFIELD ENVIRONMENTAL Falc4D11seal Cha8Vicent ap,unn,xmesr raerw,uromt nmunuoo qt.plmeU� Bull LenOnll lC\` B r . 011 �aa.A CORPORATION Rmmsmn re.:tmm aa� October 11, 1995 Ms. Katherine Yarosh Orange County Sanitation DLsuicts 10944 Ellis Ave Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Subject: Extension of Current Disposal Agreement Dear Ms. Yarosh: By this letter, BKK Landfill will agree to an extension of the existing disposal agreement for the receipt of residual solids from County Sanitation District. BKK will agree to an extension at the current rates for a period not to exceed six months. This period should provide the District with the time needed tu complete the new contracting process. The current base rate applied to the contract is $26.00 per tun, plus all current fees and taxes. The applicable lets and taxes ace as follows: Wcst Covina City License Tax - 10% of the Disposal Fee L.A. County Solid Waste Management Fee - $0.86 per ton California Slat:Solid Waste Disposal Fee - $1.34 per ton Administrative Fee - $0.11 per ton West Covina City Local Enforcement Agency Reimbursement Fee - $0.22 per ton Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to call. Si y, L ; Ann Cullen Contract Administrator Z /Z #OOM 7119W )DM 80:81 ' 26-11-OI' ML X01M:A9 1AL]S JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING FF OCTOBER 25, 1995 District 1 Agenda Item (9)(C): Consideration of motion approving Settlement Agreement with Alphanetics, Inc. and Francisco Lopez in the amount of $42,000.00 as a result of wastewater discharge violations. Summary Pursuant to the provisions of the Clean Water Act and the General Pretreatment Regulations,the Districts regulate,by permit and ordinance,the discharge of industrial wastewater from over 420 Significant Industrial Users into the Districts'sewerage system. Enforcement of the Districts'"Pretreatment Program" is essential to ensure compliance with federal and state mandates applicable to the Districts through our NPDES permit. To determine the status of the effluent discharges by Alphanetics,Inc.,a circuit board facility located in Santa Ana,CA,the Districts initiated a downstream sampling program between August 1994 and May 1995. The results of the downstream sampling for the subject time period establish that,on numerous occasions,Alphanetics,Inc.failed to comply with the discharge limits in the Districts'Wastewater Discharge Regulations(Ordinance)and in the Federal Categorical Pretreatment Standards. On July 31, 1995,the Districts transmitted to Alphanetics,Inc. and Francisco Lopez,President of Alphanetics,Inc. (collectively "Alphanefics")an Administrative Complaint identifying the discharge violations. Pursuantto Calitomia Government Code Section 54740.5 and Section 6150.6 of the Districts'Ordinance,staff recommended that Alphanetics pay$52,500 based on Alphanetics'violations of its wastewater discharge limits for copper and lead on nineteen sampling days between August 1, 1994 and May 31. 1995. Pursuant to Resolution No. 93-13,negotiations have taken place among Districls'staff,legal counsel,and Mphanetics. Based on the results of these negotiations, Districts'staff recommends the settlement of all matters related to the enforcement action by entering into a Settlement Agreement, and requiring Alphanetics to pay$42,000 over a period of 27 months in settlement of the alleged violations. Alphanefics has represented its willingness to settle on these terms. Staff Recommendation Receive and file Staff Report dated October 2, 1995, and pursuant to Article IV,Section 4.3 of Districts' Resolution No.93-13(Settlement of Civil Administrative Enforcement Actions),authorize staff to enter into a Settlement Agreement with PJphanetics,in a form acceptable to General Counsel and requiring Alphanetics to pay the amount of$42,000 in equal installments over a period of 27 months. Consistent with other Source Control settlement agreements,interest will be charged at an annual rate of 10%if PJphanetics fails to make timely payment pursuant to the Agreement. j,1wR15pptAValeUlD07ARD a 1 a �m October 2, 1995 STAFF REPORT Request for Authorization to Enter into a Settlement Agreement Between Alphanetics, Inc. And Francisco Lopez, and County Sanitation District No. 1 BACKGROUND Pursuant to the provisions of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. §1251 et. seq.) and the General Pretreatment Regulations (40 CFR Part 403), the Districts regulate, by permit and ordinance, the discharge of industrial wastewater from over 420 Significant Industrial Users into the Districts' sewerage system. Enforcement of the Districts' "Pretreatment Program" is essential to ensure compliance with federal and state mandates applicable to the Districts through our NPDES permit and to ensure the environmentally safe operation of the Districts' treatment facilities. In order to determine the status of the effluent discharges by Alphanetics, Inc., a circuit board facility located in Santa Ana, CA, the Districts initiated a downstream sampling program between August and November 1994, and January and May 1995. The results of the downstream sampling for the subject time period establish that, on numerous occasions, Alphanetics, Inc. failed to comply with the discharge limits in the Districts' Wastewater Discharge Regulations (Ordinance) and in the Federal Categorical Pretreatment Standards. On July 31, 1995, the Districts transmitted to Alphanetics, Inc. and Francisco Lopez, President of Alphanetics, Inc. (collectively "Alphanetics") an Administrative Complaint identifying the discharge violations. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54740.5 and Section 615.D.6 of the Districts' Ordinance, staff recommended that Alphanetics pay $52,500 based on Alphanetics' violations of its wastewater discharge limits for copper and lead on nineteen sampling days between August 1, 1994 and May 31, 1995. In addition, the Districts' staff recommended that, as a consequence of Alphanetics misrepresenting its self-monitoring sampling results for the same time period designated above, Alphanetics' permit be suspended for five consecutive working days commencing the day after the Districts' Order of Permit Suspension becomes final. Following issuance of the Administrative Complaint, Alphanetics made several changes to its operations to ensure future compliance. Alphanetics terminated its contract with the individual who had been in charge of compliance with wastewater discharge requirements on a day-to-day basis. Alphanetics also hired and trained a CSDOC 0 P.O. Box 8127 0 Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 6 (714) 962-2411 A P Staff Report - Alphanetics, Inc. Page 2 of 2 October 2, 1995 treatment operator, and improved the operation and maintenance procedures at its facility to ensure long-term compliance. After making these changes, Alphanetics indicated to Districts' legal counsel and staff that it was willing to settle all matters related to these enforcement proceedings through payment of $42,000 payable over a 27-month period. The Districts' staff recommends acceptance of this settlement. Districts' staff believes that the proposed agreement and the administrative penalties are a reasonable and cost-effective settlement of Alphanetics' violations and will be a deterrent to future violations. A hearing regarding suspension of Alphanetics' Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit and the assessment of penalties was originally scheduled for September 13, 1995. The hearing was continued until November 16, 1995, at the request of Alphanetics in order to allow continuation of the settlement negotiations with the Districts' staff. If the proposed settlement is approved by the Districts' Board of Directors, the hearing will be cancelled, and the Settlement Agreement will be executed on behalf of District No. 1. RECOMMENDATION Receive and file Staff Report dated October 2, 1995, and pursuant to Article IV, Section 4.3 of Districts' Resolution No. 93-13 (Settlement of Civil Administrative Enforcement Actions), authorize staff to enter into a Settlement Agreement with Alphanetics, in a form acceptable to General Counsel and requiring Alphanetics to pay the amount of $42,000 in equal installments over a period of 27 months. Consistent with other Source Control settlement agreements, interest will be charged if Alphanetics fails to make timely payment pursuant to the Agreement. MT/AR:cg/lvw J:\WP\1i9]WIIWE\FlP9IAFF JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS MEETING AGENDA FOR OCTOBER 25, 1995 Item (11)(a): Minutes of the Executive Committee Summary (1) Receive and file Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization Study Committee Minutes for the meetings held on July 14, 1995 and September 13, 1995. (2) Receive and file draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on September 27, 1995. (3) Receive and file draft Minutes of Operations,Maintenance,and Technical Services Committee for the meeting held on October 4, 1995. (4) Receive and file draft Minutes of Planning, Design and Construction Committee for the meeting held on October 5, 1995. (5) Receive and file draft Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on October 11, 1995. (6) Receive and file draft Minutes of Meeting of Ad Hoc Committee re Landfill Issues held on October 18, 1995. (7) Receive and file draft Executive Committee Minutes for the meeting held on October 18, 1995. Sommery See attached minutes. Executive Committee Recommendation to the Joint Boards of Directors Receive and file minutes listed above. J�Iwc. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California P.O.Box 8127.10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92728.8127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF AD HOC COMMITTEE MEETING Friday. July 14, 1995 at 5:00 o.m. A meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11. 13, and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Friday, July 14, 1995, at the Districts'Administrative Office. (1) ROLLCALL Those present were as follows: AD HOC COMMITTEE: STAFF PRESENT: John Collins, PDC Comm. Chair Don McIntyre, General Manager John Cox, Joint Chair Gary Streed, Director of Finance Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair John Linder, Director of Engineering Don Griffin, Past Joint Chair Steve Hovey, Director of Information Technology Paul Mitchell, Engineering Supervisor (2) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments received. (3) APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the July 6, 1995 Ad Hoc Committee were approved as written. (4) REPORTS OF COMMITTEE CHAIR, GENERAL MANAGER, AND DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING There were no reports. (5) NEW AND MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS There were none. Minutes of Ad Hoc Committee Meeting Page 2 July 14, 1995 (6) OLD BUSINESS (a) The draft Scope of Work for space utilization study was discussed. The Committee was asked to review the draft Scope with the current revisions and return as soon as possible. The Scope will be revised and returned to this Committee for review prior to sending out with Request for Proposals (RFP) to selected consultants. (b) The modifications to the Administration space were discussed, along with an on-site inspection of the existing space. The modifications as proposed will be reviewed to cut down on the amount of revisions. Based on the revisions, the staff was authorized to proceed with procuring the modifications pending one last review of the revised floor plan by Director Griffin. (c) The Committee authorized staff to proceed with the procurement of a mobile office complex for the Information Technology Department. (d) The Committee authorized staff to proceed with the revisions for Finance and Accounting as discussed with the Committee. (a) Space requirements for plant automation and discussion of the proposed warehouse at Plant No. 2 will be discussed at the next Ad Hoc Meeting. (7) OTHER BUSINESS. IF ANY No other business was discussed. (8) FUTURE MEETINGS The next meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee will be held Wednesday, July 19, 1995, following the Executive Committee Meeting. (9) ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 6:05 p.m. b (� P"u. Gad Cain Committee Secretary JDL:gc ADHOC95%071495.MIN County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California P.O.Box 8127.108"Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92728.8127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF AD HOC COMMITTEE MEETING Thursday, September 13, 1995, at 7:30 p.m. A meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13, and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Wednesday, August 2, 1995, at the Districts' Administrative Office. (1) ROLLCALL Those present were as follows: AD HOC COMMITTEE: STAFF PRESENT: John Collins, PDC Come. Chair Blake Anderson, Assistant General Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair Manager Don Griffin, Past Joint Chair Judith Wilson, Assistant General Manager David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Gary Hasenstab, Director of Human Resources Paul Mitchell, Engineering Supervisor Terri Josway, Safety/Emergency Response Manager (2) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments received. (3) APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the September 7, 1995 Ad Hoc Committee were approved as written. (4) REPORTS OF COMMITTEE CHAIR GENERAL MANAGER AND DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING There were no reports. (5) NEW AND MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS None to report. Minutes of Ad Hoc Committee Meeting Page 2 September 13, 1995 (6) OLD BUSINESS (a) Discussion of Proposed Warehouse Modifications at Plant No. 2. Proposed modifications to the existing warehouse were discussed. David Ludwin indicated that a seismic evaluation will be made on the structure in the near term to determine the feasibility of modifying the building. In addition, a more accurate estimate of costs for the upgrades needed will be prepared for discussion at the November 2, 1995 Ad Hoc Committee Meeting. (b) Discussion of Proposed Scope of Work for Space Utilization Study for Administrative Personnel. The proposed Scope of Work was discussed and final comments were received from the Committee. (c) Discussion of Additional Information Provided for Proposed Changes to Safety and Emergency Response Division Office Space. Terri Josway gave a briefing on the confidential nature of the work done by the Safety and Emergency Response Staff. After discussion, a modified plan to provide office space was approved by the Committee. (7) OTHER BUSINESS. IF ANY No other business was discussed. (8) FUTURE MEETINGS The next meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee will be held on Thursday, October 19, 1995, at 5:30 p.m. to discuss the staff evaluation of the Space Utilization Study proposals and recommendations for consultant interviews. (9) ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 8:00 p.m. Gall Cain Committee Secretary DAL:gc J%WPDOCWDHOC9MEPTW1395.MIN County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California P.O.Box 8127•10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714) 962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF AD HOC COMMITTEE MEETING Thursday, September 13, 1995, at 7:30 o.m. A meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13, and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Wednesday, August 2, 1995, at the Districts' Administrative Office. (1) ROLL CALL Those present were as follows: AD HOC COMMITTEE: STAFF PRESENT: John Collins, PDC Come. Chair Blake Anderson, Assistant General Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair Manager Don Griffin, Past Joint Chair Judith Wilson, Assistant General Manager David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Gary Hasenstab, Director of Human Resources Paul Mitchell, Engineering Supervisor Terri Josway, Safety/Emergency Response Manager (2) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments received. (3) APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the September 7, 1995 Ad Hoc Committee were approved as written. (4) REPORTS OF COMMITTEE CHAIR GENERAL MANAGER. AND DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING There were no reports. (5) NEW AND MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS None to report. Minutes of Ad Hoc Committee Meeting Page 2 September 13, 1995 (6) OLD BUSINESS (a) Discussion of Proposed Warehouse Modifications at Plant No. 2. Proposed modifications to the existing warehouse were discussed. David Ludwin indicated that a seismic evaluation will be made on the structure in the near tens to determine the feasibility of modifying the building. In addition, a more accurate estimate of costs for the upgrades needed will be prepared for discussion at the November 2, 1995 Ad Hoc Committee Meeting. (b) Discussion of Proposed Scope of Work for Space Utilization Study for Administrative Personnel. The proposed Scope of Work was discussed and final comments were received from the Committee. (c) Discussion of Additional Information Provided for Proposed Changes to Safety and Emergency Response Division Office Space. Terri Josway gave a briefing on the confidential nature of the work done by the Safety and Emergency Response Staff. After discussion, a modified plan to provide office space was approved by the Committee. (7) OTHER BUSINESS, IF ANY No other business was discussed. (8) FUTURE MEETINGS The next meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee will be held on Thursday, October 19, 1995, at 5:30 p.m. to discuss the staff evaluation of the Space Utilization Study proposals and recommendations for consultant interviews. (9) ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 8:00 p.m. r .w a I Cain Committee Secretary DAL:gc J9WPDOCWDHOC9 EPTD91395MN County Sanitation Districts +� of Orange County,California P.O. Box 8127 • 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714) 962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE September 27, 1995 -5:30 p.m. A meeting of the Steering Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held Wednesday, September 27, 1995, at 5:30 p.m., at the Districts' Administrative office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: STEERING COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT: Present: Terry Andrus, Counsel John C. Cox, Jr., Joint Chair Peer A. Swan, Vice Joint Chair STAFF PRESENT: George Brown, Chair, FAHR John J. Collins, Chair, PDC Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager Pat McGuigan, Chair, OMITS Blake P. Anderson, Assistant General Manager Judith A. Wilson, Assistant General Manager Jean Tappan, Secretary Absent: Roger Stanton, Vice Chair, FAHR (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. .q Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting Page 2 September 27, 1995 (4) APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the August 23, 1995 Steering Committee meeting were approved as drafted. (5) REPORTS OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR, GENERAL MANAGER AND GENERAL COUNSEL (a) There was no report by the Committee Chairman. (b) The General Manager added two information items for discussion to the agenda, the use of Merrill Lynch by PIMCO for investment and an update on the consolidation effort. PIMCO's Use of Multiple Brokerage Firms Judy Wilson reported that the PIMCO monitoring reports indicate that Merrill Lynch is one of the brokerage firms they are placing orders with; of the 64 orders placed so far, 12 have been with Merrill Lynch. PIMCO was contacted about the potential conflict and they indicated that they would prefer to continue to use Merrill Lynch as they often are the best purveyor, but would honor our directions. PIMCO indicated that not using Merrill Lynch would affect the yield. Blake Anderson raised the question at the OCIP meeting this morning. As long as we maintain the customer status with PIMCO and we are in a secondary position, no further action needs to be taken on this issue. Update on Consolidation Effort Staff and General Counsel met with LAFCO's new Executive Officer Dana Smith, who has experience in special districts consolidations. LAFCO will be giving us a punch list of what will be required, including detailed financial analyses, budgets for the past three years, future estimated costs and underlying debt, analysis on user fees, and impacts on the users. Full disclosure will be required. If all nine districts support the consolidation, they will have to go forward; if not, the Executive Officer asked that we consider consolidating eight districts and contracting with IRWD for District 14 as we do with SAWPA. One consideration of the consolidation will be the redistribution of property taxes. Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting Page 3 September 27, 1995 If possible, a general election is to be avoided. If all nine districts adopt resolutions, there would be no problem and no election would be required. With less than nine districts, LAFCO could order consolidation election, or impose an all-or-nothing plan. Counsel will check to see if there may be a conflict of interest by the Districts' Board members who serve on LAFCO. Ms. Smith suggested that as the process becomes more intense, we may want to hire a consultant to assist us. She estimated that three to four months will be required to put everything together to submit to LAFCO and another four months after the application is received for review and action. Director Swan asked about the impacts on District 14. They will be addressed in the financial analyses. The governing board of the resulting district will be made up of one representative per city, district and county. Judy discussed the next steps in the process and will continue to update the Directors as events unfold. This item will be presented to the Executive Committee in October. Staff was directed to review the Dana Point Sanitary Districts consolidation report for information. (c) There was no report by Counsel. (6) REPORT ON EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT RETREAT The Executive Management Team retreat was held on August 24 and 25, with David Jones facilitating. One of the major results was the need for serious discussion with the Boards on moving ahead with the strategic planning effort. The need for forming several volunteer employee committees was determined and, as a result, a Training Advisory Group and a Core Values Committee have been established. When the Communications Director is on board, a Communications Committee will also be formed. The Training Advisory Group will be assessing training needs throughout the plants and how to implement the needed training within the budget. The Core Values Committee will determine "rules of the road", or how staff deals with one another. Q Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting Page 4 September 27, 1995 The General Manager's role in the organization was also discussed, and he will be the link between the Boards and the organization, help to change the culture of the organization towards a more collegial atmosphere; and turn over the day-to- day operations to the two Assistant General Managers. Department priorities were determined, and goals are now being developed by each department. The team also set criteria for measuring success. A complete goals statement for all departments will be available next month, and there will be work plans for each division within the department. These will be presented at the October meeting of the Steering Committee. (7) DISCUSSION OF STRATEGIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION After the retreat, the need to move more quickly on developing a new strategic plan became apparent. A lot of decisions are being delayed as a result and we may be spending money on things that are not necessary. Among those things that need to be addressed are: • Considering opening up the NPDES permit process. • The impact on our operations as a result of EPA's decision on San Diego. • Reduction in flow. • Commitment to reclamation. Blake Anderson indicated that there are a lot of external issues that are affecting the Districts, including what can be done to manage our future flows to delay or even eliminate the need for additional facilities. Additional staff time is being assigned to three projects: Project 1 is the repair of the existing outfall; Project 2 is management of the peak hydraulic discharge; and Project 3 is review of the annual and capital financial charges. Chair Cox asked that asset management be added to consider how we use and new uses for our electricity, natural gas, biosolids, and excess land. Other things being considered are updating the master plan, staff and training support facilities, finance requirements, sewer control and pollution prevention, operations and maintenance requirements, and programmatic requirements. Staff was directed to consider conservation and flow control . Project X, the public participation effort, will be necessary when EPA considers our permit application. Staff was directed to make this same presentation at the next Executive Committee meeting and to provide the flip chart strategic planning information in handout form. Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting Page 5 September27, 1995 (8) DISCUSSION OF POLICY IMPLICATIONS OF PROPOSED COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS FUELING STATION After discussion, it was determined that this project is considered a part of asset management and staff was directed to continue its efforts. (9) REPORT ON PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS OF EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENTPERSONNEL The General Manager reported on the results of the Department Heads evaluations and resulting salary changes. The Steering Committee concurred and indicated that it was within the General Manager's charge to review and approve the evaluations of staff. At this time, the General Manager is not authorized to make merit increases at the end of probationary periods, only at the end of the fiscal year, and this change was requested to bring Blake Anderson into line with Judy Wilson's salary. This can be simplified by adoption of Res. 95-54 in October. The Steering Committee members indicated that a benchmarking study of key personnel positions be undertaken, comparing similar positions in both the public and private sectors. Judy Wilson will direct Human Resources to track this. (10) PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF GENERAL MANAGER After discussion, it was decided that the General Manager is to prepare more specific goals addressing direct lines of responsibility and ensuring better reports to Committees. The Steering Committee and the General Manager will determine a set of measurable goals for the annual performance evaluation at the next meeting. (11) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. 4 Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting Page 6 September 27, 1995 (12) OTHER BUSINESS Director Swan asked about the status of the deferred compensation issue. This will be presented to the FAHR and Executive Committees and the Joint Boards in October. (13) MATTERS TO BE REPORTED AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were no matters to be reported. (14) MATTERS ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT There were no matters for a future agenda. (15) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next meeting will be at the call of the Joint Chair. (16) ADJOURNMENT The Steering Committee adjourned at approximately 7:25 p.m. Submitted by: Jean Tappan, Steering Committee Secretary J1W GOCLGNS]PLOMMOd]]BS.NIY County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California vy P.O. Box 8127. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714(962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF THE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 4. 1995 -5:30 PM A meeting of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on October 4, 1995, at 5:30 P.M. at the Districts'Administrative offices. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present as follows: Committee Directors Present: Staff Present: Pal McGuigan, Chair Don McIntyre, General Manager Peer Swan,Vice Joint Chair Judy Wilson, Chief Administrative Officer Barry Denes Gary Hasenstab, Director of Human Resources Norman Z. Eckenrode Ed Hodges, Director of Maintenance James M. Ferryman Steve Hovey, Director of Information Technology Julie Be David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Sal Sapien Bob Ooten, Director of Operations Gary Streed, Director of Finance Nancy Wheatley, Director of Technical Services Laurie Bluestein, Laboratory Manager Irwin Haydock, Scientist Terri Josway, Safety Mike Moore,Technical Services George Robertson, Environmental Management Michael Rozengurt, Environmental Management Ed Torres, Environmental Management Dan Tunnicliff, Safety Michele Farmer, Environmental Management Committee Directors Absent: John C. Cox, Jr., Joint Chair Victor Leipzig,Vice Chair Mark Murphy (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIRMAN PRO TEM, IF NECESSARY No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments from the public. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Meeting Page 2 of 4 October 4, 1995 (4) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR, GENERAL MANAGER, ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER OF OPERATIONS, DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS. DIRECTOR OF MAINTENANCE AND DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES (a) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Director Pat McGuigan extended a warm welcome on behalf of the Committee to David Ludwin, the new Director of Engineering, and to the other members of staff who are not usually present. (b) REPORT OF GENERAL MANAGER Don McIntyre spoke of the need to move forward on the Districts' Strategic Plan of Action for the Districts. He noted that the presentation by Irwin Haydock on the Ocean Monitoring Program at tonight's meeting moves us forward in the direction of a Strategic Plan for Ocean Monitoring. (c) REPORT OF ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER OF OPERATIONS Blake Anderson was unable to be present at the meeting. (d) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS Bob Ooten reported on the closing of BKK Landfill and noted that it has a possibility of impacting our grit and screenings hauling contract. (e) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF MAINTENANCE Ed Hodges reported on the following: 1. The state of the "bone yard" at Plant No. 2. We are getting bids for removal of the engines that are still there on the 17th of this month. 2. The surge tower and the problems involved in trying to paint it. He will report any progress at the next meeting. 3. The benchmarking study being done by the Collections Division. There is a possibility the Districts will be asking for help from the member cities. (f) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES Nancy Wheatley reported that the new Laboratory Manager, Dr. Samuel Mobray, will begin work at the Districts on October 23, 1995. (5) APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 6, 1995 There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held on September 6, 1995, it was moved, seconded and carried that said minutes be deemed approved as mailed. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance a. and Technical Services Committee Meeting Page 3 of 4 October 4, 1995 (6) OLD BUSINESS OMTS95-019: Review of Ernst and Young Recommendation for a North County Yard Ed Hodges gave an update of staffs findings of the property located on Harbor Boulevard in Anaheim. The Committee requested that staff contact the members of the Joints Boards from Anaheim and ask for their input on this subject. It was moved, seconded and carried to authorize staff to take this item through the Executive Committee to the Joint Boards, with the full appraisal added, for authorization to bid on the property at the County auction to be held on October 27, 1995. OMTS95-021: Quarterly Report on the Districts' Occupational Injury and Near Miss Accident Rates Terri Josway gave the 1995 Third Quarter report. It was decided that future reports will include vehicle accident data. It was also decided that future reports will be given a month later to allow for the data to be compiled and sent out with the Committee agenda packages. (7) NEW BUSINESS OMTS95-043: Consideration of motion to receive and file OMTS Committee certification for Professional Services to develop an Integrated Emergency Response Plan and award a contract to Communications Performance Group, Inc. for a cost not to exceed $125,000 for the 1995-96 Fiscal Year and a total cost of $312,232. Dan Tunnicliff gave a detailed report on the merits of awarding the contract to Communications Performance Group, Inc. After some discussion, it was moved, seconded and carried to approve staffs recommendation. The Committee requested milestone reports for the duration of the Contract. OMTS95.044: Districts' 301(h) Ocean Monitoring Program (OMP)and OMP Scientists' Workshop. Nancy Wheatley introduced the members of her staff who have worked on the Ocean Monitoring Program then Irwin Haycock gave an informative presentation on Ocean Monitoring after which a discussion ensued. OMTS95-045: Consideration of motion authorizing an increase in the expenditures for the Districts' in-house analyses supporting the Joint Ultraviolet Pilot Project between Orange County Water District and the Districts from $40,000 to $57,000 in direct labor and material costs. The original expenditures of $40,000 were authorized in April 1993. Refer to April 14, 1993 Board Item (13)(b)(2). Laurie Bluestein gave a short presentation and, without discussion, it was moved, seconded and carried to approve staffs recommendation. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Meeting Page 4 of 4 October 4, 1995 (8) CLOSED SESSION The Chair declared there were no items for closed session. (9) OTHER BUSINESS, IF ANY 1. Staff was given kudos by the Directors for Family Day. 2. Staff will be setting up another tour of Plant No. 2. There will be a Board Letter item in the October Joint Board agenda package. 3. Directors wishing to take a boat tour on the Crusader on October 17 should contact Clarice Marcin at (714) 962-2411, extension 3001. (10) MATTERS ON WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING None. (11) MATTERS A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT None. (12) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING DATES AND ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AT THOSE MEETINGS None. (13) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:45 P.M. Glance M. Marcin Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Secretary R:%WPDOCWO\ERIOMTSWINUTES M%10. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California v P.O. Box 8127•10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714) 962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE THURSDAY. OCTOBER 5. 1995 at 5:30 p.m. A regular meeting of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13, and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Thursday, September 7, 1995, at the Districts'Administrative Office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was taken and a quorum declared present, as follows: Planning, Design and Construction Committee: Staff Present: Present: Don McIntyre, General Manager Blake Anderson, Assistant General John Collins, Chair Manager Shirley Dettloff David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Don Griffin Steve Hovey, Director of Info. Technology Barry Hammond Ed Hodges, Director of Maintenance Margie Rice Bob Ooten, Director of Operations Sheldon Singer, Vice Chair Gary Streed, Director of Finance Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair John Linder, Construction Manager Charles Sylvia Bob Zemel Absent: Others Present: John Cox Mary Lee, John Carollo Engineers d Minutes of Planning, Design and Construction Committee Meeting Page 2 October 5, 1995 (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments received. (4) APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 7. 1995 MEETING The minutes of the September 7, 1995 Planning, Design and Construction Committee Meeting were approved as written. (5) REPORTS OF COMMITTEE CHAIR GENERAL MANAGER, ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER, DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING. AND GENERAL COUNSEL (a) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR No report was given. (b) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager stated we were moving forward to update the 20/20 Plan. The Assistant General had previously given a fairly comprehensive presentation on the need for that update. All Committees will be presented with a time line that will include a quarterly, half-day workshop on Saturdays to discuss the important policy decisions needed. It is approximately an 18-month process. (c) REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER The Assistant General Manager reported that there is still no resolution to the bankruptcy. All differences have not been reconciled between the Sacramento Legislation and the agreement that was signed last month. Also discussed was our application for a waiver from a full secondary treatment that was submitted in 1989 and our existing permit. (d) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING No report was given. (e) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL No report was given. Minutes of Planning, Design and Construction Committee Meeting Page 3 October 5, 1995 (6) STAFF OVERVIEW OF DISTRICTS' PLANNING. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES (a) Status Report on Jobs within the Plants and the Districts by the Director of Engineering The Director of Engineering reported on projects that are on-going in the plants. P1-36-2, the Secondary Expansion at Plant No. 1, is a new project. The Notice to Proceed was issued to Margate Construction on September 18, 1995. This is a project that will be carried out under a Partnering Agreement with the Districts, the contractor, and the engineer. The Space Utilization Study is currently underway. The Scope of Work was finalized in September with the Ad Hoc Committee and sent out to five prequalified firms. Five proposals have been received which are curren8y under review. The staff will be reviewing the proposals and presenting recommendations to the Ad Hoc Committee in approximately two weeks. Interviews will be set up on November 2, 1995 with the firths that are best qualified. The results of those interviews will be reported to the PDC Committee November 2, 1995. The Professional Services Contract will be awarded at the Board of Directors' Meeting on November 15, 1995. The evaluation of the Plant No. 2 Warehouse has been under discussion by this Committee and the Ad Hoc Committee. A seismic evaluation of the building is currently being conducted to determine what structural modifications would be needed. In addition, costs are being updated for necessary modifications to the building to make it inhabitable as a long-term warehouse facility. Those costs will be presented to this Committee at the November 2, 1995 PDC Committee Meeting. (b) Justification of the Need for the Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2 At the last PDC Committee Meeting, the Maintenance building at Plant No. 2 was discussed and staff was asked to come back with an assessment of that project. Ed Hodges gave a brief analysis as to the need for a Maintenance building at Plant No. 2. Ernst 8 Young recognized the need for a Maintenance building and, in fact, it was one of their recommendations in their audit of the Operations and Maintenance Department, rating it as a "high priority." Ed provided a slide presentation showing the office and shop areas, as well as shower, locker, and lunch room facilities. After the slide presentation, there was discussion regarding the need for the Maintenance Building and questions regarding square footage and costs. After the discussion. It was moved, seconded, and carried to approve this item. (7) OLD BUSINESS None to report. 9 Minutes of Planning, Design and Construction Committee Meeting Page 4 October 5, 1995 (8) ACTIONS RE PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTS (a) Quarterly Change Order Report by Director of Engineering on Change Orders approved by the General Manager, Planning, Design and Construction Committee, and Joint Boards, in accordance with Resolution No. 95-9. A revised packet was distributed which contained the revised spreadsheet of the Quarterly Change Order Report. The Construction Manager, on behalf of the Director of Engineering, reported on the Quarterly Change Order Report. He discussed the three new Change Orders listed on the report. The Change Orders were presented for information only as they were previously approved by the General Manager. (b) Action items: PDC95-29: Consideration of Motion Accepting Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-R7 as Complete, and Authorizing Execution of the Notice of Completion and Approving the Final Closeout Agreement. The Construction Manager explained that this is a District 2 item that the PDC Committee is reviewing for that District. This particular item was started one year ago last June and the contract has been complete for several weeks. This is being brought forth for final Closeout action to the Joint Boards. It was moved, seconded, and carded to recommend approval of this item. PDC95-30: Consideration of the Following Actions Relative to the Plans and Specifications for Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-1A, Increasing the Amount of Change Orders on this Contract to $508,315.81, Increasing the Original Contract Amount from $8,278,963.00 to $8,787,298.81. (1) Consideration of Motion Approving Change Order No. 3 to the Plans and Specifications for Said Project Authorizing a Net Addition of$39,734.90 to the Contract with Mladen Buntich Construction Company, Inc. for Six Items of Added Work, and Granting a Time Extension of 33 Calendar Days. (2) Consideration of Motion Approving Change Order No. 4 to the Plans and Specifications for Said Project Authorizing a Net Addition of$209,090.78 to the Contract with Mladen Buntich Construction Company, Inc.for Nine Items of Added Work, and Granting a Time Extension of 39 Calendar Days. Minutes of Planning, Design and r Construction Committee Meeting Page 5 October 5, 1995 (3) Consideration of Motion Approving Change Order No. 5 to the Plans and Specifications for Said Project Authorizing a Net Addition of$12,642.00 to the Contract with Mladen Suntich Construction Company, Inc. for an Adjustment of Engineer's Quantities. (4) Consideration of Resolution No. 95-_, Accepting the Said Contract as Complete, Authorizing Execution of the Notice of Completion and Approving the Final Closeout Agreement. After some discussion, it was moved, seconded, and carried to recommend approval of this item. Staff was directed to be more specific if there are any liquidated damages or any incentive provisions involved in approving time extensions. (9) ADDENDA TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS None to report (10) NEW PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS None to report. (11) CONSIDERATION OF NEW AND MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS PDC95-31: Approval of the Partnering Charter and the Value Engineering Clause for Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36-2. The Director of Engineering gave an overhead presentation outlining the concept of partnering and its benefits and cost-effectiveness. Partnering was described as an informal agreement to establish a clear understanding and the sharing of mutual goals. On September 11, 1995, there was a formal partnering session during which staff from the Districts, the contractor and its subcontractors, and the consultant, John Carollo Engineers, established a series of partnership goals. The concept of value engineering was discussed and its incentive to the contractor to suggest methods more economical and share in any resulting savings. Motion was made for a recommendation to accept and approve the Partnering Charter and the Value Engineering Clause to this contract. After a question and answer session, it was moved, seconded, and carried to approve this item. (12) CLOSED SESSION The Chair determined that there was no need for a closed session. 0 Minutes of Planning, Design and Construction Committee Meeting Page 6 October 5, 1995 (13) OTHER BUSINESS. IF ANY None. (14) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING A request was made for an update on what was happening at the Microbiology Lab. A request was made to have the next PDC Committee Meeting held at Plant No. 2 in order to actually see things that have been discussed in the meetings at an earlier time. It was decided we would meet in the Administration Building at Plant No. 2 at 5:00 p.m., with a tour first and then dinner. (15) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT There were no matters discussed. (16) NEXT MEETING (a) Executive Committee Meeting -Wednesday, October 18, 1995, at 5:30 p.m. (b) Ad Hoc Committee Meeting-Thursday, October 19, 1995, at 5:30 p.m. (c) Joint Boards of Directors Meeting -Wednesday, October 25, 1995, at 7:30 p.m. (d) Planning, Design and Construction Committee Meeting -Thursday, November 2, 1995, at 5:00 p.m. at Plant No. 2 Administration Building (In Huntington Beach on Brookhurst between Hamilton and Pacific Coast Highway). (17) OTHER ANNOUNCEMENTS, IF ANY None. (18) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjoumed at 7:00 p.m. V, 4� e� Gail A. Cain Planning, Design and Construction Committee Secretary I�VGOODPD�W Cp1 bEBS.MY County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California P.O. Box 8127. 108"Ellis Avenue y Fountain Valley,CA 92728-0127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE Wednesday. October 11, 1995, 5:30 P.M. A meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on October 11, 1995 at 5:30 p.m., at the Districts' Administrative Offices. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: Committee Directors Present: Staff Present: George Brown, Chairman Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager Jan Debay Judith A. Wilson, Assistant General Manager James Flora Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance John M. Gullixson Ed Hodges, Director of Maintenance Wally Linn Bob Ooten, Director of Operations Thomas Saltarelli Gary Hasenstab, Director of Human Resources Peer Swan Steven J. Hovey, Director of Information Tech. Michael D. White, Controller Stephen V. Kozak, Financial Manager Committee Directors Absent John C. Cox, Jr., Joint Chairman Others Present: Burnie Dunlap Roger R. Stanton, Vice Chairman Terry Andrus, General Counsel William G. Steiner (2) APPOINTMENT OF A CHAIRMAN PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS No comments were made. Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 2 October 11, 1995 (4) REPORTS OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR, GENERAL MANAGER, ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER(S). DIRECTOR OF FINANCE/TREASURER, DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES, DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND GENERAL COUNSEL (a) Report of the Committee Chair The Chairman had no report. (b) Report of the General Manager The General Manager, Donald F. McIntyre, reported that he was becoming concerned about recent policy papers from taxpayer associations regarding user fees, asserting that the fees are taxes if they are mandatory and not discretionary. User fees for waste water treatment could be challenged under this theory. (c) Report of Assistant General Manager- Operations No report. Report of Assistant General Manager - Administration Judy Wilson had no report. (d) Report of the Director of Finance/Treasurer (1) Finance Directorrrreasurer Gary Streed updated the Committee on the status of the Districts' COP program, and the performance of remarketing agents PaineWebber and J.P. Morgan. Mr. Streed noted that the variable rates rose slightly at the end of September due to historical quarter-end fluctuations. The rates declined to prior levels at the beginning of October. Staff will continue to keep the Committee fully informed about developments in the program as they occur each month. (2) Pacific Investment Management Company, "PIMCO," the Districts' Investment Manager, and Mellon Trust Company, Custodial Bank, both signed their final contracts on September 6, 1995, in time for the U.S. Treasury Bill maturity on September 7. Mr. Streed advised that $233.1 million was placed in the long-term portfolio and $60 million went into the short-term portfolio. September was, therefore, a transitional or structuring month. The first PIMCO report was discussed as item FAHR 95-41. Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 3 ti October 11, 1995 (e) Report of the Director of Human Resources Gary Hasenslab had no report- (f) Report of the Director of Information Technology The Director of Information Technology, Steve Hovey, had no report. (g) Report of General Counsel Terry Andrus had no report. (5) APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the draft minutes of the October 11, 1995, meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee. (6) Consideration of OMTS95-041 -Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) Refueling Station Ed Hodges, Director of Maintenance, gave a brief presentation detailing the costs associated with the operation of a Compressed Natural Gas refueling station. After discussion on this item, it was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend the Executive Committee approve the Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) Refueling Station project; authorize staff to loan reserve funds to build the station; and create an enterprise account for this project. The staff was requested to report on the results at least annually. (7) OLD BUSINESS FPC95- 3 Consideration of motion to approve reimbursement of participants' deferred compensation contributions. Assistant General Manager Judy Wilson reviewed the history of the Districts' deferred compensation plan and the funds that were held at the Orange County Treasury from 1975 until 1995. She noted that these funds were included in the OCIP failure. In January 1995, the County Board of Supervisors established pay-out limits for all participants in the OCIP. County employees were given a 90% payout of their deferred compensation balances; however, the Districts' deferred compensation participants were only given an 80% pay-out, treating them the same as the balance of the OCIP investors. $933,335.96 is still outstanding for the Districts' deferred compensation participants. The CSDOC group was the only non-County group of participants whose deferred Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 4 October 11, 1995 D compensation plan was administered and segregated at the County at the time of the bankruptcy. After discussion on this matter, is it was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Executive Committee of the following three-point resolution: A. Deposit $311,119 of the loss for the next three years with Lincoln National Insurance Plan. B. Do not provide an "interest earnings" adjustment. C. Distributions from the Bankruptcy Court on behalf of the Deferred Compensation Plan will reimburse the Districts, to the extent that they are available. Director Gullixson opposed the motion. FAHR95-25 Consideration of motion to approve revision of Resolution No. 95-54 Pertaining to Classification. Compensation, and Other Terms. Conditions. Rules and Regulations of Employment. Resolution No. 95-54 was adopted by the Boards on May 24, 1995. Gary Hasenstab, Director of Human Resources, advised that staff and General Counsel have reviewed Resolution No. 95-54 and are proposing amendments to reflect staffing changes in the 1995-96 approved budget, changes in legislation and labor practice, and policy statements which more accurately portray Districts' managements' new direction. After a brief discussion on this matter, it was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend adoption of Resolution No. 95-_on the basis that there are no substantive changes in the level or cost of entitlements over previously adopted resolutions, that liability insurance required of Executive Management will be increased and a waiver provision be included to all the Districts to hire former employees employed by outside firms within 12 months of their employment with the Districts if it is in the best interest of the agency. The waiver would require approval of the FAHR Committee. (8) NEW BUSINESS FAHR95-38 Consideration of motion approving authorization for staff to solicit bids for Phase III and IV F.I.S. Consultant and Acceptance of F.I.S. RFP prepared by Deloitte & Touche. Mike White, Controller, advised that the Ernst & Young report of July 1995, on the Finance Function Review, recommended a number of enhancements to the RFP prepared by the consulting firm of Deloitle &Touche for the acquisition and Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 5 October 11, 1995 4 installation of a new financial information system within the Districts' Finance Department. Those enhancements included: Additional functionality requirements in the area of Project Accounting and Cashiering; expanded functionality in the Contracts Subsystem area; and functionality requirements for the Human Resources application. The RFP for a new Financial Information System (FIS) is now complete. After discussion on this matter, it was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the following staff recommendations: 1. Direct staff to solicit bids for a professional consulting agreement for the completion of Phase III, Selection Process for Hardware and Software, and Phase IV, Implementation and Acceptance of the Selected Hardware and Software Solutions for the Financial Information System project 2. Approve for release the Request For Proposal for a Financial Information System. Distribution of the RFP will be made to appropriate vendors as identified by the selected professional consulting firm hired to complete Phases III and IV. FAHR95-39 Consideration of motion to receive and file staff report regarding monitoring of the Local Agency Investment Fund. Steve Kozak, Financial Manager, in response to the Committee's request at their September meeting, reported on the Districts' investments with the California Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF). He reviewed LAIF's composition and oversight committee structure, the current status of LAIF Investments; and the reports available to the Districts for continual monitoring. After discussion on this matter, it was moved, seconded and duly carried to receive and file this report. FAHR95-40 Consideration of motion to change the "Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Capacity Rights in Treatment. Disposal and Sewer Facilities" between County Sanitation District No. 14 and the other County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. Assistant General Manager Judy Wilson updated the Committee on the status of the IRWD's Wetland Water Supply Project which proposes to divert a significant portion of its flow to the duck ponds from October 21 through March 31. If the Regional Water Quality Control Board approves the plan, the flow could be diverted as early as January 1996. Removal of this flow from the CSD system could have a significant impact on each of the Districts. Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 6 October 11, 1995 D After discussion on this matter, it was moved, seconded and duly carried to affirm the Executive Committee's direction to negotiate a change to the 1986 "Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Capacity Rights in Treatment, Disposal and Sewer Facilities," so that the District No. 14 annual flow is based upon the actual average flow per day for the four highest months, in order to provide capacity for higher winter months flows. Directors Swan, Saltarelli and Debay abstained from the vote. FAHR95-41 Consideration of motion to receive and file monthly investment report and staff report regarding performance monitoring of Pacific Investment Management Company. Steve Kozak reported on the performance of Pacific Investment Management Company. He advised that during the month of September, PIMCO completed approximately 75 transactions, purchasing and selling securities to properly structure the Districts' two investment portfolios in accordance with the Districts' Investment Policy Statement. He advised monthly reports will be available from PIMCO to the Districts after the fifth business day following the end of the preceding month. Monthly bank statements from Mellon Trust, detailing portfolio transactions and account balances, will also be available to the Districts. The Districts' Investment Advisor, Callan Associates will prepare and present to the Committee Quarterly Performance Reports. After discussion on this matter, it was moved, seconded and duly carried to receive and file this report. FAHR95-42 Consideration of motion to approve staff recommendations re microcomputer acquisition issues (Specification No. E-2611. Steve Hovey, Director of Information Technology, gave an overview of the microcomputer acquisition issues. At the July 6, 1995 meeting of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee, item PDC95-24 "Discussion of Plant Automation Computer System and Consideration of Motion Authorizing Staff to Issue Purchase Order with Pioneer-Standard Electronics for Two VAX 4000 Model 705A Computers for Plant 2 Plant Automation", was presented to the Committee. This proposal included the purchase of 32 DEC Pentium Personal Computers for Operations at both plants. The Committee authorized staff to proceed with the purchase of the Two VAX 4000 Computers for Plant 2 automation, but the purchase of the Personal Computers was deferred pending a staff evaluation to identify more cast effective options. After discussion on this item, it was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the following actions: Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 7 October 11, 1995 1. Recommend to the Joint Board that the Districts' policy with regards to standards for PC technology shall be that all PC technology purchases be limited to the most recent list of Tier 1 and Tier 2 vendors as defined by GartnerGroup, for both desktop computers and mobile computers. 2. Recommend to the Joint Boards that the Districts policy state that, with regards to the purchase of PC technology all purchasing actions utilize California Multiple Award Schedule (CMAS) contracts for the purchase of PC technology from among the list of Tier 1 and Tier 2 vendors as mentioned in the previous motion. Staff will compare CMAS pricing and choose the lowest priced Tier 1 and Tier 2 vendor's configuration applicable to the Districts' needs. 3. Recommend consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Dell Computer, the lowest priced Gartner Tier 112 vendor at this time, in a total amount not to exceed $208,900.00, including sales tax, for the Purchase of 60 Personal Computers and monitors and other associated components (Specification No. E-261). 4. Direct staff to issue an RFP for Hardware Maintenance Services and an RFP for Software Help Desk Services. Staff will evaluate proposals, rank and present their recommendations to the Committee for award of a Purchase Order for such services in an amount estimated not to exceed $150,000. FAHR9543 Consideration of motion to approve staff recommendation for the establishment of a Relief Operator bonus of$.60 per hour for employees covered by the Operations and Maintenance Memorandum of Understanding through a Side Letter Agreement in order to reduce overtime costs. Gary Hasenstab, Director of Human Resources, advised the Committee that the annual overtime cost to operate both treatment plants is currently about $375,000. Forty-eight percent (48%) of this total, or$180,000, is attributable to holiday coverage and is currently controlled by operating at minimum staffing levels on holidays. The remaining fifty-two percent (52%), or$195,000, is caused by employees working overtime to cover for the scheduled or unscheduled absences of other employees in an effort to meet minimum staffing requirements. Overtime costs could be further reduced through use of a relief, or floater, position that could be assigned to any vacant shift on a regular basis. A Relief Operator bonus offers an inducement to work this otherwise undesirable and unpredictable shift, which may vary from mornings one week to nights the following week. Eight such positions at both plants have the potential of reducing overtime costs by up to $100,000 annually. Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 8 October 11, 1995 P After discussion on this item, it was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend the Executive Committee approve staffs recommendation to establish a Relief Operator bonus of$0.60 per hour for employees covered by the Operations and Maintenance Memorandum of Understanding through a Side Letter of Agreement. (9) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session required. (10) OTHER BUSINESS, IF ANY None. (11) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING No reports were requested. (12) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT None. (13) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING DATES AND ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AT THOSE MEETINGS The next Committee meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, November 8, 1995. (14) ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 7:40 p.m. GGS:lc J:\WPDOCIFIN\CRANBFPC,MTGIFAHR.95 P61 AHR.MINWFAHR10.95 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California b P.O.Box 8127 a 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714) 962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF THE AD HOC COMMITTEE RE LANDFILL ISSUES Wednesday, October 18, 1995 at 4 p.m. A meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee re Landfill Issues of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on October 18, 1995 at 4 p.m., at the Districts'Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: AD HOC COMMITTEE: PRESENT: OTHERS PRESENT: Joint Chair John C. Cox, Jr. Betty Mrgudich, Counsel Director George Brown Chip Clements, Clements Environmental Director John Collins Michael Ozawa, Paine Webber Director Pat McGuigan Rebecca Casey, Saybrook Capital Director Sheldon Singer John Schotz, Saybrook Capital STAFF PRESENT: BA SENT: Don McIntyre, General Manager Vice Joint Chair Peer Swan Blake Anderson, Chief Operations Officer Director Don R. Griffin Judy Wilson, Chief Administrative Officer Director John Gullixson Steve Kozak, Financial Manager Director Sal Sapien Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary Conna Chaudhry, Executive Assistant (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLICCOMMENTS - There were no comments by any member of the public. Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee Page 2 October 18, 1995 (4) APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee meeting re Landfill Issues held on August 18, 1995 were approved as drafted. (5) REPORTS OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR GENERAL MANAGER, AND GENERAL COUNSEL The Committee Chair had no report. The General Manager reported that staff was continuing the due diligence as directed by the Boards. The information presented at this meeting will also be presented to the Joint Boards next week. Staff will be requesting additional funds to continue the due diligence effort. There was no report by General Counsel. (6) DISCUSSION OF LANDFILL ISSUES. Staff and our consultants presented a status report on the due diligence efforts to date. Attached is a handout that details the items covered in the presentation. Chip Clements presented a report on the regional perspective addressing the six-county area, remote sites, both permitted and planned, and business considerations. Orange County is in an enviable position in that there is capacity available for possibly 50 to 80 more years. When comparing tipping fees with the other counties and remote sites, Orange County's are about average. The future of landfills in Southern California was discussed and twenty years from now Orange County could be the only large metropolitan county in the state with operating landfills. The current landfill system in Orange County was reviewed. The three operating landfills are operating at one-half capacity. An environmental audit was done on the operating landfills to determine the liability status. On the whole, all of them were rated good and substantially in compliance, with no great liability in evidence. Steve Kozak reported on the existing MOUs between the County of Orange and the host cities. Each contains similar elements including disposal limitations, road construction and maintenance, visual screening requirements, operating hours, litter control. There are specific requirements in each MOU as well. The possibility of using Measure M funds for the road construction was discussed. Application for these funds could be made by the County of Orange on behalf of the Landfill Operator. Chip Clements addressed the liability status of the closed landfills. This is the major concem. Pictures of the landfills have been taken and can be presented if requested. The results of Phase I assessment of the 21 closed sites have shown that 11 of the 21 sites have low or very low liability exposure, 4 sites have limited exposure, and 6 sites have high exposure. These are the ones that have significant liability and will incur ongoing costs. Potential remedial actions include site closure costs, postclosure maintenance costs, groundwater monitoringlremediation, gas monitoring and control, and repair of ground settlement. Betty Mrgudich reported on wastestream Flow control, discussing California Franchise agreements and local control of the wastestream, the promise of a local waste stream (flow control), and legal strengths and weaknesses. Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee Page 3 October 18, 1995 • Rebecca Casey reported on cash flow due diligence issues, including present and future capital expenditures which could include huge variations, future tipping fee levels, closure/postclosure reserves and operating costs. Chip Clements described day-to-day operating costs, currently$21.75/ton (normalized to $18.50/ton) for Orange County. With some changes, he estimated that $15/ton could be achievable. John Schotz discussed the term sheet, including the option to purchase and the need for a confidentiality agreement with the County in order to obtain both hard and soft numbers 10 be able to develop a price. This would take about four to six months to gather the required information. It was proposed that the term sheet presented to the County would include a nonrefundable $100,000 option, which would be applied toward the final purchase price. Mike Ozawa reported that he has met with County staff and they are prepared to give us the information. However, when asked how much it costs to operate the landfill system, they have answered with what they need to operate the system. That need could include any amount of money for other County accounts. The governance issue was discussed. There are two options: 1) to form a new County Sanitation District, or 2) form a Joint Powers Agreement. The requirements and benefits of both options were discussed. It was mentioned that the existing Sanitation Districts could have a seat on the new District, and the existing staff would provide the management of the new system. One concern raised by cities and other agencies is that the tipping fees already provide the funding necessary for the purchase of the landfills. The transfer of the landfills to a new organization using long-term debt financing for acquisition, may result in added costs. Betty indicated that the acquisition costs are the price associated with removing the landfill system to a new organization in order to establish policy control, and the users of the landfill system have not fully funded the purchase of the landfills because the costs incurred in owning a landfill accrue forward in time from siting, construction and permitting through operation and maintenance to actual closure and beyond. The costs incurred in owning a landfill are met by the tipping fees paid by the users of the system in the past, the present, and the future. The recommendations at this time are: 1. Conduct expanded Phase I assessment studies on moderate and high exposure sites, which can be done within the existing $100,000 authorization. 2. Authorize an additional $100,000 to delineate Phase II Scope to determine liability. 3. Authorize the issuance of a letter of interest to enter into negotiations for the purchase of the County of Orange landfill system, including a $100,000 nonrefundable option payment that can be applied toward the purchase price. This information will be presented to the Executive Committee on October 18. Consideration of the recommendations will be requested at the October 25, 1995 Joint Boards meeting. Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee Page 4 October 18, 1995 (7) CLOSED SESSION There was no need for a Closed Session. (8) OTHER BUSINESS There was no other business discussed. (9) MATTERS TO BE REPORTED ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were no matters to be reported on at a subsequent meeting. (10) MATTERS ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT. There were no matters addressed. (11) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING The next Ad Hoc Committee meeting will be at the call of the Chair. (12) ADJOURNMENT The Ad Hoc Committee adjourned at approximately 5:35 p.m. Submitted by: Jean Tappan, Secretary rwnoocnrminxmuurnacxo+aermi Status of Due Diligence Proposed Acquisition of Orange County Solid Waste Management System Presented To: Ad Hoc Committee Re Landfill Issues October 18, 1995 I. Solid Waste Management - A Regional Perspective Il. Overview of Current Orange County Landfill System Ill. Wastestream Flow Control IV. Preliminary Due Diligence Review V. Preliminary Term Sheet VI. Policy Issues Ad Hoc Committee Re Landfill Issues I. Solid Waste Management • A Regional Perspective (A) • Permitted Landfill Life (B) • Landfill Tipping Fees (C) • The Future In Southern California (D) Ad Hoc Committee Re Landfill Issues REGIONAL PERSPECTIVE (T-A) • Six County Area Orange(County landfills) Los Angeles(Public and private landfills) San Diego(County landfills) Riverside(County landfills, El Sobrante in partnership with Western Waste) San Bernardino (County landfills) Ventura(County and private landfills) • Remote sites Permitted La Paz(Arizona-BFI) Franconia(Arizona-WMX) Roosevelt (Washington -Rabanco) ECDC (Utah-ECDC Corp) Lockwood (Nevada-Refuse, Inc.) Planned Eagle Mountain(Riverside) Mesquite(Imperial) Bolo(San Bernardino) Elsmere(LA) BUSINESS CONSIDERATIONS • Buyers market(excess landfill capacity) • Dynamic commodity(transfer stations prevalent and multiplying-60 to 70"/, of trash through transfer stations in Orange County) • Trucking competitive to 150 miles • Rail competitive to 1,000 miles coupled with low landfill tipping fee(S IO to $15 per ton) • Large haulers will use their own disposal sites wherever possible Ad Hoc Committee Re Landfill Issues Permitted Landfill Life 60 50 40 C u 30 20 10 0 Oren" Loa AnSetae Son Oiaga Vantvra Rlvaraida San aernadino County (_-C) Landfill Tipping Fees $50.00 $45.00 $40.00 $35.00 $30.00 m $25.00 $20.00 $15.00 $10.00 $5.00 $0.00 Orange Los Angeles Son Diego Venwm Rl.relde Sian Bernadine Remote Site, County FUTURE IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA • Decreasing local landfill capacity • Increasing number of NWs and transfer stations • Permitting of additional remote landfills in and out of State • Increased recycling and composting up to 400/6 range(AB 939) • Increasing waste generation as recession ends (working against reductions from AB 939) • Emergence of rail haul 20 years from now, Orange County could be the only large metropolitan county in the State with operating landfills. Orange County planned well in permitting large landfills while it was still possible, and in fostering the development of NWs and transfer stations. Ad Hoc Committee Re Landfill Issues II. Overview of Current Orange County Landfill System • Active Landfills • Tonnage Projections (A) - Table 1 (B) - Liability Status (C) • MOUs With Host Cities (D) - Brea - Irvine - San Juan Capistrano • Closed Landfills - Liability Status (E) - Low Exposure (11 Sites) - Limited Exposure (4 Sites) - High Exposure Sites (6 Sites) Ad Hoc Committee Re Landfill Issues N a ORANGE COUNTY ANNUAL WASTE DISPOSAL TONNAGE PROJECTIONS 4500 4250 4000 3750 3500 13250 n_ 3000 +� 2750 f 2600 1 2260 N 2000 1750 1500 1250 m v 1000 lilflill1i m Y u 0 Table 1 ORANGE COUNTY LANDFILLS (30 June 1994) DAILY TONNAGE D CAPACITY ILLION TONS LIFE 1 LANDFILL PERMITTED CURRENTLY PERMITTED ULTIMATE PERMITTED ULTIMATE RECEIVED PRIMA 4,000 1,000 53 72 170 231 OLINDA ALPHA 8,000 4,600 5 43 3 30 BOWERMAN 6,658 4,200 76 85 58 65 (1)At 3 Million tons per year(currently received),and 6 day/week operation. ACTIVE LANDFILLS LIABILITY STATUS Bowerman • Lined sub-title D landfill • Opened in 1990 • Five year permit revision in process • Groundwater monitoring system in place • Gas monitoring and collection systems in place • No major violations or enforcement actions • LEA says site is well run and in compliance Prima • Un-lined sub-title D landfill, accepts digested sewage sludge • Opened in 1979 • General Development Plan N progress • City to amend General Plan • Must submit permit revision for sewage sludge • Leachate extraction system with 4 monitoring wells • Gas monitoring and control system in place(flare) • Violations for sludge disposal and land use(being resolved) • LEA says site is well run and in compliance Ad Hoc Committee Re Landfill Issues OlindaMlinda Alm • Un-lined sub-title D landfill • Opened 1960(Olinda), 1981 (Olinda Alpha) • Groundwater contamination has occurred . 51 wells installed remediation system in place treatment system in place • Landfill gas problems have occurred . collection system installed (Flare) 13 megawatt generating station on -line by 1997 • Operating under Notice and Order for exceeding permit capacity at Olinda - no other problems • Applied for permit revision to combine two sites • LEA says site is well run and in compliance SantiagQ • Unlined landfill • Accepts only 2,500 tons per year(mothballed) • Expected closure by 1998 • Gas collection system installed (Flare now, energy recovery in future) • Shallow groundwater contaminated - remediation system has been designed • Subsurface pyrolysis(underground fire) being controlled by gas extraction system, increased cover and other controls. No problems noted over last six months. Ad Hoc Committee Re Landfill Issues MOU BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF ORANGE AND THE CITY OF BREA Executed March, 1992 (Amended: April, 1993 and November, 1994) PURPOSE: to identify the understanding of the parties regarding continued operation of the Olinda/Olinda Alpha landfill, and conditions to be implemented to allow for expansion of the landfill. DISPOSAL LIMITATIONS: Landfill operation will be limited to a maximum annual average of 6,000 TPD. The landfill will cease acceptance of waste no later than December 31, 2013. LANDFILL MONITORING: An appropriate leachate collection and disposal system should be in operation by July 1994. OPERATING HOURS: The operating entity will limit landfill access to the hours of 6:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday. LITTER CONTROL: County shall establish a litter clean-up program for the Tonner Canyon landfill access road from the landfill entrance to the 57 Freeway, and any other City approved routes to/from the landfill. VISUAL SCREENING: To minimize the visual impact of the landfill, the County will submit landscaping plans by June 1994, and will implement the plans by July 1996. BORROW SITE: The County shall aggressively advocate the use of alternative cover, such as shredded green waste, with appropriate State agencies. ROAD CONSTRUCTION & MAINTENANCE: County will determine need for reconstruction of all landfill routes located in the City, and will share the cost of road reconstruction. No expansion of the landfill will occur until the access road and any landfill related interchange improvements are put out to bid. LANDFILL PARK: Between November 1994 and November 1996, the County shall contribute $1.5 million for the development of permanent recreation facilities from the Brea Park & Recreation Master Plan. The County will allocate $65,000 for development of said Master Plan. Between November 1994 and November 1999, the County will contribute $3.9 million, plus land acquisition costs, to obtain land and develop an 18 to 20 acre park and recreation complex. ! County shall redesign Olinda Regional Park and contribute $3.4 million for park development from 2015 through 2025. /"� civ� County shall design and construct a trail ($75,000) through the Beta parcel. All costs will be adjusted annually. ENVIRONMENTAL CLAIMS: If an unanticipated environmental impact occurs during the operation of the landfill, the City may file a claim with the County to offset such a burden. PURSUIT OF ALTERNATIVES: The County and the City agree to explore waste recovery and other alternatives to landfill operations. ENFORCEMENT: If the ownership or operating responsibilities of the landfill are transferred or assigned to any other entity, the County shall ensure that the obligations identified in this Agreement will be reassigned. SK:cmc J:\WPDOCIGMV NI)FILLV DHOC\101895.P2 MOU BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF ORANGE AND THE CITY OF IRVINE Executed August, 1984 PURPOSE: To resolve certain litigation, and create a binding agreement between the parties with respect to the commencement and operation of the Bee Canyon/Bowerman landfill. DISPOSAL LIMITATIONS: Landfill operation will be limited to a maximum annual average of 6,000 TPD, adjusted for growth within the service area. LANDFILL MONITORING: County shall install a state-of-the-art methane gas collection system for odor control and methane recovery. If necessary, leachate collection procedures will be implemented by the operating agency. Daily random sampling and inspection of truck loads shall be established for hazardous wastes. REFUSE COMPOSITION: Sludge treatment, including drying, mixing, or dumping of sludge will be prohibited. PUBLIC DUMPING: County will exclude public dumping as long as some alternative is available in the area. OPERATING HOURS: The operating agency will limit landfill access to daylight hours Monday through Saturday. LITTER CONTROL: Upon initiation of landfill operations, the County will implement a litter clean-up program on Sand Canyon Avenue between 1-405 and the landfill access road. VISUAL SCREENING: County will provide maximum screening of the landfill access road from view of the village of Northwood. ROAD CONSTRUCTION & MAINTENANCE: County will determine need for reconstruction of all landfill routes located in the City, and will share the cost of road reconstruction. RESOURCE RECOVERY: County will develop an action plan for implementing a program of resource recovery, including a target date for waste-to-energy pilot plant operation. MOU BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF ORANGE AND THE CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO Executed September, 1995 PURPOSE: to identify the understanding of the parties as to how the County will mitigate the impacts of Out-of-County waste disposal at the Prima Deshecha Landfill on the City. DISPOSAL LIMITATIONS: The landfill currently accepts 1,100 TPD. Disposal of Out-of-County waste shall not cause the tonnage to exceed 4,000 TPD. Importation shall begin in January 1997. An annual tonnage limitation is stipulated at 1,228,000 tans. ROAD CONSTRUCTION: If County begins accepting Out-of-County waste, County shall design and construct Antonio Parkway between Oso Parkway and Ortega Highway by May 31, 1999. The County shall award a construction contract by December 31, 1997. SOUNDNISUAL SCREENING: County shall construct an earthen berm (4 to 5 feet high by 900 feet long) along Avenida La Pate to buffer residential units from noise generated by vehicles traveling to the landfill. PARK USE FINANCING: County agrees that the GDP for the landfill will include a financial analysis and plan for the ultimate recreational land uses following closure of the landfill. HOST FEE: As mitigation for landfill access, the County will pay the City no less than $0.81 per ton for each ton of Out- of-County waste deposited at the landfill. CLOSED LANDFILLS LIABILITY STATUS Overview • 21 sites owned and/or operated by the County of Orange • Coyote Canyon is the largest, closed in 1990 under new regulations Remaining 20 sites have been closed for 18 years or more • Many sites were former gravel pits 6 sites adjacent to water courses • Water SWATS prepared for 17 • Air SWATS prepared for 4 • 4 sites have law suits pending against them, one other site is involved in a monetary settlement • 15 sites have groundwater monitoring systems, 8 have landfill gas monitoring systems Results of initial Phase I assessment of the 21 sites 1. 11 of the 21 sites have low or very low liability exposure' 2. 4 sites have limited exposure 3. 6 sites have high exposure(law suits, existing contamination, sensitive receptors) . Longsdon(Garden Grove) . Canal Street (Anaheim) . Forster Canyon(San Juan Capistrano) . Lane Road (Irvine) . Sparkes Pit (Anaheim) . Coyote Canyon(Irvine) Potential remedial actions: . site closure . postclosure maintenance . groundwater monitoring/remer iation . gas monitoring and control . repair of ground settlement RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Conduct expanded Phase I on moderate and high exposure sites 2. Deleneate Phase 11 scope III. Wastestream Flow Control • California Franchise Agreements and Local Control of the Waste Stream (A) • The Promise of a Local Waste Stream (B) • Legal Strengths and Weaknesses (C) Ad Hoc Committee Re Landfill Issues (III-A) California Franchise Agreements and Local Control of the Waste Stream Exclusive solid waste franchise contracts have been upheld by California Courts as within the permissible exercise of police power. See, Waste Resource Technologies v. Department of Public Health. Further, the Integrated Waste Management Act (Public Resources Code Section 40059) provides that cities may determine whether solid waste handling services will be provided by franchise, contract, license, permit or otherwise. A. Exclusive franchise agreements provide control over the destination of flow by stating: 1. City reserves the right to designate to hauler the location for the appropriate disposition and processing of all solid waste generated within the franchise area. 2. Hauler shall dispose of all refuse in a legal manner at a sanitary landfill, transfer station or other facility, at the direction of city. (III-B) The Promise of a Local Waste Stream Cities may enter into contracts to promise that they will direct their franchise haulers to deliver waste to the County landfills, using language such as: 1. 100% of the solid waste proper for disposal at a class III landfill, which is generated within the City shall be committed and delivered to the County's landfills, provided, however, that City shall not be bound to require delivery if the same is not allowed by law. 2. The solid wastes generated by state or federal governmental entities are exceptions to the above delivery obligation. Additional exceptions may be provided for self-hauled wastes and recyclables. 1 Each City will agree to implement a waste flow enforcement program through license, permit or franchise to assure its waste stream commitment will be met, and these agreements will be entered into or revised at the earliest possible time. The City will implement such other mechanisms for meeting its flow commitment as may become necessary. pu-c► Legal Strengths and Weaknesses Flow Control Cases A. The Carbone v. Town of Clarkstown : A U.S. Supreme Court Decision. 1. Facts: The flow control was achieved by ordinance requiring that all solid waste generated within the town be disposed of at the town transfer station. 2. Ruling: The U.S. Supreme Court held the Ordinance invalid because it imposed a commercial barrier or discriminated against an article of commerce: access to the service of processing and disposing of solid waste. 3. Application of the Case to Orange County Situation: Best possible Interpretation: Flow control cannot be achieved by requiring local cities to adopt ordinances requiring that solid waste be delivered to County facilities. B. Other Recent Cases. This case shows that the Court of Appeals in the Second Circuit (New York) is reading the Carbone decision in accordance with the best possible interpretation above. SSC Corp v Town of Smithtown 1. Flow control was achieved by ordinance prohibiting disposal elsewhere and by a contractual arrangement whereby the City's exclusive hauler agreed to deliver all solid waste it collected to the facility. 2. Ruling: The Court found the flow control ordinance to be improper market regulation in accordance with Carbone, but the acts of the city in accessing services through contracts made it a market participant in economic activity and that activity was allowable. 3. Application of the Case to Orange County Situation: Best Possible Interpretation: When a city expends its own funds to acquire services, it is a market participant and may establish favorable contract terms for the serviced purchased. Concern: In Orange County some hauler contracts or franchise agreements call for payments to be made directly by businesses/residents to the haulers. IV. Preliminary Due Diligence Review • Landfill System Valuation - Cash Flow (A) - Operating Costs (B) - Closure Cost Comparison (C) • Importation Ad Hoc Committee Re Landfill Issues (r V-A) Cash Flow Due Diligence Issues : MMMENESSIM • Present & Future Capital Expenditures • Future Tipping Fee Levels • Closure/Post Closure Reserves • Operating Costs low (_�-$> LANDFILL OPERATING COSTS MMMEN ■ 011 1 ■ Orange County — $21.75/ton (normalized to $18.50/ton) ■ Calabassas (L.A. County Sanitation Districts) — $14/ton ■ Santa Maria — $15-17/ton (with estimated economies of scale) ■ National Average (Public sites) — $13-16/ton ■ Michigan (Cost Model) — $13/ton ■ Kentucky (Cost Model) — $20/ton Clements Environmental (iv-c) CLOSURE COST COMPARISON Disposal Closure Total Estimated Estimated Coat Est. Tipping Landfill Site Acreage Date Closure Costa per acre Fee Coverage millions 0 /ton Calabasas 416 2018 $58 $140,000 $3.20 40 (final phase) $4.6 $115,000 Sailard 1996 Not Applicable 159 (total) $13.2 $83,000 Olinda/Olinda Alpha 358 2025 $40 0112,000 $0.93 Bowerman 362 2053 $32 $8810D0 $0.42 Prima Deshecha 800 2165 $54 $68,000 $0.24 Santiago 130 closed $26 $200,000 closed Michigan (Modell 80 N/A $8 $1001000 N/A Ad Hoc Committee Re Landflif Issues V. Preliminary Term Sheet (A) Ad Hoc Committee Re Landfill Issues Terms & Conditions u :s Landfill System Acquisition setlen county or Orange s¢p� Purabesv: Orange Cmmtr Sanitation Districts,or SPA Aarcl To De Purchased: Entire Orange Cuaoty Landfill Wem -all attire mod closed miles vrlpermits -all operating,esmow,and thtrd party account balances Liabilhles To Be As mad: Entim Orange Co,l.endrtil System-so will be defined In the Due Dltigrece Period. Exlstiug MOU's with boat cMes. Initial Option Teem: 6 months to months Option Price: % of the present value of the Canary's lost Importation revemae during the Initial Option Tuml or stepped option purchase price(pay to play). Stepped Option Purchase Price will be a credit tawads final acquisition prior. Due D181mce Period: 6 to 9 monihs,or agreed epos,Initial Option Trrm 4 due Ditigmce Terms: Coenry F%MD wlD provide all larormatloorequested,subject to enafidenddity agreement. n Intel, Eega a t for Informadoo: Exb ft contrach with wvee hmalers,within the Cannily and ooWde the Cowry; thgolng o monthly leneage recordsl Scope of Site Assessment Brody (Mot the contract writs the law ftrm)i Names of 21 e)owd altes for which the Cowry has lhbR41 Why? HU"ofclosed rites? Current litigations?What bads}WhichSites? Details an ceneskd 1991 Eeflmdivgl Why? Support for budgeted appal expenditures,professional service and grand madateommoehtracCum ? maintenance. n s Terms & Conditions InIWi Due DR*nce: Importatlon: W01 the Seller be party to negotlatloan reprding trash Importatbn?SpmM=Hy,wBl the contracts be blinding If the Syahm to cold? AntonioPerkweyt Ice the$43 mil0on cast eetWate acruratel Confirm that the County Road Fund will be funding for this aphal eapraditum. Bra park Lauds BstsbOeb specific=MCI for catalog cutoro neat of County to City. CCC€ PrOhnInary Purchase lMce To be determined,subject to doe diligence with reepect to thibgityi plus the eesumptloo of the System-s$SI mOSon in alatlog debt and etdetlog cash reserve. Pretlmtsaq Flouncing Terns: Senior Bonds: Malorib: 2S to A years Debt SeMm Corsage: Lm to I.SX Debt Service Reserve Fond: 10%of par amount of bonds Rate Covamt: 1.25X to I.SX u Jmlor Bonds(Wdm7): a Matortly: 25 to 30 Yeas Debt Sevla Coverage: 1.1X 1 plda cep mom mesh flow repeal to coverage oo Smle Bards 4' T a� A VI. Policy Issues • Governance (A) • Transfer-Purchase Issues (B) • Staffing Obligations of Successor Agency Ad Hoc Committee Re Landfill Issues (VI-A) Governance A. Formation of a new County Sanitation District 1. Requirements. • Board of Supervisors could initiate the formation of a new County Sanitation District . • Public hearing and voter objection provisions would apply. • LAFCO has the authority to review and approve the formation of new districts. 2. Benefits. • County Sanitation Districts can acquire refuse disposal facilities and maintain and operate a system for disposal of refuse. • Governance structure is familiar to the cities and entities that participate in CSDOC. B. Formation of a Joint Powers Agency 1. Requirements. • Pursuant to Government Code Section 6500, a new joint powers agency can be formed as a separate legal entity by mutual written agreement of the interested public entities. • In this case, the JPA could be created by the cities and any public district having the authority to own and operate a solid waste disposal system (such as CSDOC). Ad Hoc Committee Re Landfill Issues 2. Benefits. • Right to exercise any of the powers that its member entities hold in common. • Flexibility to address the unique interests of different parties in governance participation, operational responsibility and financial support. • The existing governing boards of one or more of its members or elected officials from each of its member entities may comprise the governing body. Ad Hoc Committee Re Landfill Issues 0• (VI-B) Transfer/Purchase Issues • One concern that may be raised by the cities and other agencies currently using Orange County's landfills is that their historical payment of tipping fees has already provided the funding necessary for the purchase of the landfills; therefore, a transfer of the landfills to a new organization, which is accompanied by long term debt financing for acquisition may results in added costs. • This can be responded to by acknowledging that the acquisition costs are the price associated with removing the landfill system to a new organization to establish policy control. • Further, the historical users of the landfill system have not fully funded the acquisition of the landfills because the costs incurred in owning a landfill accrue forward in time from siting, construction and permitting through operation and maintenance to actual closure and beyond to environmental monitoring and maintenance of the closed site. All of these stages create the total cost of having an available landfill. • These costs are met by the tip fees paid by the users of the landfill system in the past, the present and the future. Ad Hoc Committee Re Landrin issues County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California P.O. Box 8127 • 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Wednesday, October 18, 1995- 5:30 P.M. A meeting of the Executive Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Wednesday, October 18, 1995, at 5:30 p.m., at the Districts'Administrative offices. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT: Present: Terry Andrus, Counsel Betty Mrgudich, Counsel John Cox, Jr., Joint Chair Chip Clements, Clements Environmental Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair Michael Ozawa, Price Waterhouse Pat McGuigan, Chair, District 1 and John Scholz, Saybrook Capital OMTS Chair Rebecca Casey, Saybrook Capital John J. Collins, Chair, District 2 and PDC Chair George Brown, FAHR Chair STAFF PRESENT: Sal A. Sapien, Chair, District 3 Jan Debay, Chair, District 5 Don McIntyre, General Manager James Ferryman, Chair, District 6 Blake Anderson, Chief Operations Officer Barry Hammond, Chair, District 7 Judith A. Wilson, Chief Administrative Officer John Gullixson, Chair, District 13 Gary Hasenstab, Director of Human Resources Thomas Saltarelli, Chair, District 14 Ed Hodges, Director of Maintenance Roger Stanton, County Supervisor David Ludwin, Director of Engineering William Steiner, County Supervisor Bob Dolan, Director of Operations Gary Streed, Director of Finance Nancy Wheatley, Director of Technical Services Absent: Lauri Bluestein, Acting Lab Manager Dan Tunnicliff, Safely and Health Division Don R. Griffin, Past Joint Chair Terri Josway, Safety and Health Manager Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary Corina Chaudhry, Executive Assistant (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. Minutes of the Executive Committee Page 2 of 8 a October 18, 1995 b (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. (4) APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the September 20 1995, Executive Committee meeting were approved as drafted. (5) REPORTS OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR, GENERAL MANAGER. AND GENERAL COUNSEL (a) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Joint Chair requested that an update on the Landfill Issues discussion be added to the agenda, as a result of the Ad Hoc Committee meeting held prior to this Executive Committee meeting. John Scholz reviewed the preliminary term sheet that was prepared for the Ad Hoc Committee meeting. The costs were based on acquiring the whole system, including liabilities. The Committee's recommendation to the full Boards will be to increase the total authorized expenditures to $300,000, an increase of$100,000 for additional due diligence and $100,000 as a non-refundable option to the County towards purchase of the system. The option would apply towards the purchase price. Director Leipzig expressed his continued opposition to this acquisition at this time. The General Manager reiterated that this purchase only works if all of the cities buy into the plan and ensure flow control. He also mentioned that Districts' staff and consultants are available to meet with any of the cities that have questions or want additional information. Both Supervisors Steiner and Stanton said that they supported this plan because it made sense. The issue of liability should not be looked at as a total, but rather as some level of probability. Director Ferryman asked about the motives for doing this. The General Manager said that it would allow the cities control of governance of the landfill system, ensure flow control, as well as expectations of profit in the future. Because of the increasing value of the landfills as sites are closed, there may be some opposition within the County to selling the system. A full report will be presented at next week's Joint Boards meeting. Minutes of the Executive Committee .. Page 3 of 8 October 18, 1995 (b) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager received a call from Neil Cline, the General Manager of SAWPA, regarding the agreement that is on the agenda, Item (11)(a), requesting that he and his chairman be allowed to meet with Chair Cox and staff before the Directors consider the agreement. After discussion, it was agreed to remove that item from the agenda. (c) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL There was no report by Counsel. (6) (a) (1) It was moved, seconded and passed that the minutes of the July 14, 1995 Ad Hoc Committee Meeting re Space Utilization Study be received and filed. (2) It was moved, seconded and passed that the Executive Committee concur in the recommended actions of the Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization Study at the meeting held July 14, 1995, as follows: Item 6(b): Authorize staff to proceed with procurement for modifications to the Administration area pending approval of the revised Floor plan by Director Griffin. Item 6(c): Authorize staff to proceed with procurement of mobile office complex for the Information Technology Department. Item 6(d): Authorize staff to proceed with the revisions to the Finance and Accounting areas as discussed with Committee. (b) (1) It was moved, seconded and passed that the minutes of the September 13, 1995 Ad Hoc Committee Meeting re Space Utilization Study be received and filed. (2) It was moved, seconded and passed that the Executive Committee concur in the recommended actions of the Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization Study at the meeting held September 13, 1995, as follows: Item 6(b): Approve the Scope of Work for the Space Utilization Study and authorize staff to solicit proposals. After evaluation, the proposals will be evaluated by staff and recommendations will be presented at the October 19, 1995 Ad Hoc Committee meeting. Item 6(c): Authorize additional space for the Safety and Emergency Response staff as approved by the Committee. (7) It was moved, seconded and passed to receive and file draft Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting held September 27, 1995. Minutes of the Executive Committee Page 4 of 8 October 18, 1995 - (8) (a) It was moved, seconded and passed to receive and file draft Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Meeting held October 4, 1995. (b) It was moved, seconded and passed to concur in the recommended actions of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Meeting held October 4, 1995, as follows: OMTS95-043: Consideration of motion to receive and file OMITS Committee certification for Professional Services to develop an Integrated Emergency Response Plan and award a contract to Communications Performance Group, Inc. for a cost not to exceed $125,000 for the 1995-96 Fiscal Year and a total cost of$312,232. OMTS95-045: Consideration of motion authorizing an increase in the expenditures for the Districts' in-house analyses supporting the Joint Ultraviolet Pilot Project between Orange County Water District and the Districts from $40,000 to $57,000 in direct labor and material costs. The original expenditures of$40,000 were authorized in April 1993. Refer to April 14, 1993 Board Item It 3)(b)(2). One item, OMTS95-019, was pulled from the agenda. Staff was advised that the selling price of the parcel being considered for the North County Yard had been set at $4.5 million, well beyond what was considered appropriate for the proposed use. Therefore staff does not recommend proceeding with this acquisition. (9) (a) It was moved, seconded and passed to receive and file draft Minutes of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee Meeting held October 5, 1995. (b) It was moved, seconded and passed to concur in the recommended actions of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee Meeting held October 5, 1995, as follows: PDC95-31: Approval of the Partnenng Charter and the Value Engineering Clause for Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36-2. (10) (a) It was moved, seconded and passed to receive and file draft Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting held October 11, 1995. (b) It was moved, seconded and passed to concur in the recommended actions of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting held October 11, 1995, as follows: Item (6): Consideration of motion to approve OMTS95-041 - Compressed Natural Gas Refueling Station, Job No. P1-51; authorize staff to loan reserve funds to build the station; and create an enterprise account and reporting system to track project costs and revenues. Minutes of the Executive Committee Page 5 of 8 October 18, 1995 FAHR95-25: Consideration of motion to approve revision of Resolution No. 95-54 Pertaining to Classification, Compensation, and Other Terms, Conditions, Rules and Regulations of Employment, and to include a provision for requiring liability and uninsured motorist coverage in the amounts of$250,000, $500,000, and $250,000. FAHR95-38: Consideration of the following actions approving authorization for staff to solicit bids for Phase III and IV Financial Information System (F.I.S.) Consultant and acceptance of F.I.S. RFP prepared by Deloitte & Touche: 1. Direct staff to solicit bids for a professional consulting agreement for the completion of Phase III, Selection Process for Hardware and Software; and Phase IV, Implementation and Acceptance of the Selected Hardware and Software Solutions for the Financial Information System project. 2. Approve for release the Request For Proposal for a Financial Information System. Distribution of the RFP will be made to appropriate vendors as identified by the selected professional consulting firm hired to complete Phases III and IV. FAHR95-40: Consideration of motion to change the "Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Capacity Rights in Treatment, Disposal and Sewer Facilities" between County Sanitation District No. 14 and the other County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. FAHR95-41: Consideration of motion to receive and file monthly investment report and staff report regarding performance monitoring of Pacific Investment Management Company. FAHR95-42: Consideration of the following actions re microcomputer acquisition issues (Specification No. E-261): 1. Recommend to the Joint Boards that the Districts' policy regarding standards for PC technology shall be that all PC technology purchases be limited to the most recent list of Tier 1 and Tier 2 vendors as defined by GartnerGroup, for both desktop computers and mobile computers. 2. Recommend to the Joint Boards that the Districts' policy state that all purchasing actions relating to the purchase of PC technology utilize the California Multiple Award Schedule (CMAS) contracts for the purchase of PC technology from among the list of Tier 1 and Tier 2 vendors as mentioned in the previous motion. Staff will compare WAS pricing and choose the lowest priced Tier 1 and Tier 2 vendor's configuration applicable to the Districts' needs. Minutes of the Executive Committee Page 6 of 8 October 18, 1995 3. Recommend consideration of a motion authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Dell Computer, the lowest priced GartnerGroup Tier 1/2 vendor at this time, in a total amount not to exceed $208,900.00, plus sales tax, for the Purchase of 60 Personal Computers and monitors and other associated components (Specification No. E-261). 4. Direct staff to issue an RFP for Hardware Maintenance Services and an RFP for Software Help Desk Services. Staff will evaluate proposals, rank and present their recommendations to the Committee for award of a Purchase Order for such services. FAHR9543: Consideration of motion to approve staff recommendation for the establishment of a Relief Operator bonus of$0.60 per hour for employees covered by the Operations and Maintenance Memorandum of Understanding through a Side Letter Agreement in order to reduce overtime costs. After discussion, it was moved, seconded and passed, with Director Sapien abstaining, that action on Agenda Item FPC95-13, Consideration of actions re reimbursement of participants'deferred compensation contributions, be deferred until General Counsel has had the opportunity to review the IRS Private Letter Ruling received by Orange County on their deferred compensation plan reimbursement, and a determination can be made on possible tax consequences of any restitution effort by the Districts. (11) (a) CDnsiderationof the SAWPA agreement was removed from the agenda and will be considered at a future meeting, as noted in the General Manager's Report. (b) Verbal report on status of the Strategic Plan. Staff presented a report on the progress of the Strategic Plan (attached). Judy Wilson explained the anticipated time line, including Board involvement and consultant deadlines. The plan will be a two-year process, with completion scheduled for January 1998. The time line is predicated on receiving our NPDES permit by September 1996. The requirements included in the permit will determine our capital program. Quarterly workshops for Directors have been proposed to present overviews, seek direction, make policy decisions, and give staff guidance along the way. Blake Anderson discussed the elements of the Strategic Plan, as follows: • Management of peak hydraulic discharge, addressing project land use and population; performing flow projections; determining Inflow/Infiltration contributions to the collection system; determining collection system requirements; analyzing alternate peak flow management options, and determining facility sizing requirements for peak flows. Minutes of the Executive Committee Page 7 of 8 October 18, 1995 • Treatment/Reuse Requirements in order to project ocean quality objectives— permit conditions; project water reclamation needs, process requirements and space needed; determine treatment process requirements, associated costs and plant layout alternatives through 2050, and recommendations for long-term management of biosolids. • Support subjects, including estimating staff and space requirements for administrative, operations and maintenance functions; reviewing source control, ocean monitoring and laboratory needs; estimating O&M and capital needs and recommend a financial plan; and describing programmatic options and asset management opportunities. Three near-term projects were discussed. They are the rehabilitation of the outfalls with an estimated cost of$630,000; the management of peak hydraulic discharge with an estimated cost of$1,150,000; and a new financial analysis, estimated to cost $390.000. The total cost of the Strategic Plan is estimated at$2,750,000. In comparision, the 1989 Master Plan and associated EIR cost approximately$4.5 million. The General Manager mentioned that the costs will depend on how much the Directors are willing to save to risk having a spill. The reliability we have provided is very expensive. Staff will be presenting the near-term projects to the Committees for consideration in the next couple of months. (12) CLOSED SESSION There was no need for a Closed Session. (13) OTHER BUSINESS Director Gullixson asked for a status report on the ocean samples in Huntington Beach. Nancy Wheatley reported that nothing definitive has been found to date. The Boise Chica State Park may be the culprit. Our consultant is preparing a dye study and these tests should be done by early November. If available, the results will be provided at the next Board meeting, Director Gullixson also requested that the General Manager report on the meeting that was held to discuss legal services. The General Manager reported that he hosted a meeting last week with Directors Gullixson, Saltarelli and Bill Mahoney, a past Joint Chair, as well as Blake and Judy to discuss different ways to provide legal services. General Counsel has provided breakdowns on their costs, but more precise information is needed on items included in the miscellaneous category. At the meeting various options were discussed, including full-time staff counsel, someone from General Counsel's office assigned to the Districts part-time, and someone from General Counsel at the Districts' offices full time. Minutes of the Executive Committee Page 8 of 8 October 18. 1995 The General Manager has a meeting scheduled with General Counsel next week to review this information. General Counsel will be asked to prepare an analysis independent of staffs for comparison. The Directors and Mr. Mahoney will then review the information and make a recommendation for consideration by the Directors. (14) MATTERS TO BE REPORTED ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING The SAWPA Capacity Agreement will be considered after a meeting with Chair Cox and the General Manager of SAWPA. The Reimbursement of Employee Deferred Compensation Contributions will be considered at a future meeting. (15) MATTERS ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT. There were no matters for a future agenda. (16) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS Chair Cox mentioned that the next meeting of the Executive Committee is scheduled for 7 p.m., Wednesday, November 8, 1995 after the 5:30 p.m. FAHR Committee meeting. (17) ADJOURNMENT The Executive Committee adjourned at approximately 7:15 p.m. Submitted by: t1-E-w ,reah Tappan, Sec art xwuexEouc,ssw, suw TIME LINE BOARD INVOLVEMENT/CONSULTANTDEADLINES STRATEGIC PLAN November 1995 Board Action on SOO and RFP for three projects: Ocean ouffall, Peak Hydraulic Flow Study and Financial Analysis December 1995 Staff receives qualification and completes evaluation. January 1996 Board Workshop - Overview of Three Project Elements and Time Line for Strategic Plan. Staff mails RFPs to qualified firms. February 1996 Staff receives RFPs and evaluates proposals. March 1996 OMTS and PDC Committees take action to award contracts for three projects. April 1996 Board Workshop - Overview of Key Policy Issues for Updated Strategic Plan. June 1996 Consultant submits draft report on ocean outfall. July 1996 Board Workshop - Ocean Outfall - Considerations of Options. August 1996 Completion of Plans and Specs for outfall gate repairs. September 1996 Secure permit from EPA. Board action on SOO and RFP on Treatment and Reuse Study. Initiate CEQA compliance on ocean outfall rehab. Consultant submits demographic data, land use projections. October 1996 Board Workshop - Forecasts - Demographic Analysis and Its Implications - What's changed since 1989? November 1996 Board action to award contract on Treatment and Reuse Study based on 9/96 permit conditions. Consultant submits draft report with fee categories, relationship amounts. December 1996 Begin preparation of draft report on Treatment and Reuse Study. Time Line Page 2 October 17, 1995 January 1997 Board Workshop - Capital Facilities Charges - Financial Analysis. February 1997 Complete CEQA compliance on ocean outfall. March 1997 Begin preparation of Program EIR for Stategic Plan. April 1997 Board Workshop - Participating the Public - Outreach Strategies for Communications - Review Decision Model. Consultant completes Hydraulic Analysis. Consultant completes Draft Master Plans on Flow, W, Peaking future production techniques and trunk sewer analysis. Consultant completes Final report on sanitary service charge, capital facilities, connection charge and excess capacity charge. June 1997 Board Workshop - Presentation on Final Draft of Peak Hydraulic Discharge; Launching Public Outreach Plan. Jul - Dec 1997 Outreach - Public discussion. August 1997 Circulate draft EIR on Strategic Plan. Complete draft report on Treatment and Reuse. September 1997 Board Workshop - Update on Public Dialogue Issues Requiring Resolution and Direction. Hold public hearing on draft EIR. November 1997 Complete Strategic Plan Document. December 1997 Complete Final EIR January 1998 Board adoption of Strategic Plan; Certification of EIR NOTE: This timeline is based on assumption that an approved permit is secured by September 1996. The permit will provide guidance on Treatment and Reuse thresholds which will be critical factors in financial analysis and environmental evaluation. JAW:cmc J\WPWPGMJJA=.7MUNE ELEMENTS OF OUR STRATEGIC PLAN Lwmi"MANAUME ® Project land use and population. ® Perform flow projections. ® Determine Inflow/Infiltration (I & l) contributions. ® Determine collection system requirements. ® Analyze alternate peak flow management options. ® Determine facility sizing requirements for peak flows. TREATMENTIREUSE REQUIREMENTS p Project ocean quality objectives -permit conditions O Project water reclamation needs, process requirements and space needed. O Determine treatment process requirements, associated costs and plant layout alternatives through 2050. O Recommend long term management plan for biosolids. SUPPORT9Ut EATS p Estimate staff and space requirements for administrative, operations and maintenance functions. O Review source control, ocean monitoring and laboratory needs. O Estimate O & M and capital needs and recommend a financial plan. O Describe programmatic options and asset management opportunities. Iof4 STRATEGIC PLAN: NEAR TERM Highlights of the 1995-96 Program PROJECT NO. 1 : A9 TALON,-QF,0 ® Investigate the interior condition of our 120-inch, five (5) mile operating outfall. IM Clean the interior of the 120-inch outfall. Repair both outfalls, open plugged ports, etc. Analyze option to intentionally open 120-inch outfall end gate during peak flows, discuss with Regulators. Make permanent repair to 120-inch outfall end gate (gate was damaged during January 1995 storms) PROJECT NO. 2: 6 p CH ® Develop land use and population data for determination of daily flows, peak flows and Collection System needs. Land use data to be shared with financial study (below). Perform I & I study. Determine if peak flows can be economically reduced. 10 Review methods to retard peak flows. Analyze peak flow ocean discharge options. IM Conduct outfall alternative decision model with Directors, Regulators and other interested citizens and environmental groups. 2 of 4 STRATEGIC PLAN: NEAR TERM Highlights of the 1995-96 Program PROJECT NO. 3: DETERMINATION OF FINANCIAL CHARGES O With land use data developed from Project No. 2, develop multiple land use categories that are tied to the Orange County Tax Collector's base. O Review short term financial needs and compare to existing Capital Facilities Connection Charge; Excess Capacity Charge; and annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charge. O Evaluate near term charge alternatives. O Review draft information with stakeholders and make final recommendations to Directors. O Note: As a part of Project No. 4, as long term facility needs are redefined, this issue will be revisited for developing a long term financial charge program. 3 of 4 STRATEGIC PLAN Estimated Costs ITEM PROJECT MASTER PLAN COST COST 1995-96 PROGRAM - NEAR TERM ® PROJECT NO. 1: Rehabilitate Existing Ocean Outfalls .................. $ 630,000 ® PROJECT NO. 2: Management of Peak Hydraulic Discharge .............................................$ 1 ,150,000 C9 PROJECT NO. 3: Financial Analysis ........................................................ $ 390,000 FUTURE PROGRAMS 0 PROJECT NO. 4: Treatment, Reuse ................................................................................................. $ 500,000 Support/Staffing ................................................................................................. $ 350,000 CEQACompliance ................................................................................................. $ 500,000 Public Participation................................................................................................ $ 250,000 TOTAL $ 2,750,000 (For comparison purposes, the 1989 Master Plan cost approximately$4,500,000) 4 of 4 y JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING OCTOBER 25, 1995 ITEM (11)(b)(1): OMTS95-043 Consideration of the following actions relative to the Professional Services Agreement with Communications Performance Group, Inc. for design of an Integrated Emergency Response Plan (Specification No. P-166): (a) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee certification of the final negotiated fee with Communications Performance Group, Inc. for said services. (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 95-104, approving said agreement with Communications Performance Group, Inc. for said services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor, including overhead, plus fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $125,000.00 for the 1996-96 fiscal year, and a total cost not to exceed $312,232.00. Summary There are numerous regulatory requirements mandating emergency response and disaster preparedness. The purpose of disaster preparedness is to identify areas of potential vulnerability, recommend measures to reduce vulnerability, and to develop emergency response procedures for personnel in a disaster situation. Emergency response is a response effort to an unforeseen combination of circumstances that may result in extensive damage, loss, or destruction, if not addressed. The Districts do not currently comply with all emergency response and disaster preparedness related regulations. Since many of these regulatory requirements are duplicative, the Safety and Emergency Response Division created a Scope of Work for the development of an Integrated Emergency Response Plan (IERP) that will provide for the protection of the Districts' employees and surrounding communities, and meet all mandated requirements. The development of the IERP will require extremely labor intensive data collection and utilization, therefore, it is most appropriate that a consultant be retained to complete this project in a timely fashion. See attached Staff Report. Budget Information The project will be completed in two phases, with the first phase not to exceed the budgeted $125,000 for the 1995-96 Fiscal Year. The second phase will be budgeted in the 1996-97 Fiscal Year. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends awarding a contract for Professional Services to develop an Integrated Emergency Response Plan to Communications Performance Group, Inc. for an amount not to exceed 1312,232, V OMTS Committee Recommendation The OMTS Committee recommends awarding a contract for Professional Services to develop an Integrated Emergency Response Plan to Communications Performance Group, Inc. for an amount not to exceed $312,232. Executive Committee Recommendation to the Joint Boards of Directors The Executive Committee concurs with the OTMS Committee recommended actions re awarding a contract for professional services with Communications Performance Group, Inc., to develop an Integrated Emergency Response Plan (Specification No. P-166). JAWPGG MI GB =TB MBI.GVR COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA w October 4, 1995 plrona: 171418822411 Board of Directors County Sanitation Districts of mailingOBo S127ress, Orange County P.u.valley 9 FWmta�m vmiay,cocA 10844 Ellis Avenue 82728a127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 cartel address: Ice"er•Polemic Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Professional Services Agreement with FauM92 veuey,c4 Communications Performance Group, Inc. in Connection with the Development sz7c67,CA R P of an Integrated Emergency Response Plan In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional consulting Wider services, the OMTS Committee has negotiated the following fee with Communications Performance Group, Inc. for the preparation of an Integrated Emergency Response Plan and Recommendations Report, on an hourly-rate basis including labor plus overhead in an °w•• amount not to exceed $312.232. Anaheim Brae avene Perk (.yprass Professional Consulting Services, Fountain valley direct labor at hourly rates FWIBrtan Hunbrigtan Beach plus overhead at 118%, not to exceed $284,054.00 Irvine Le Habra Subconsultants Fees, not to exceed N/A Le Palma Los Bach Fixed Profit 28,178.00 orange Placenta TOTAL CONTRACT, not to exceed $312,232.00 Bence Ann Seal Beech Bourbon rusbn The OMTS Committee hereby certifies the above final negotateN fee as reasonable for the vi°a Perinch` services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the roroa undo P consultant. County of Orange sanitary oletticts Is/ Pat McGuigan /s/Victor Leipzig Coa[a Meae Pat McGuigan Victor Leipzig Bergen Groh, Chairman Vice Chairman Midway City OMITS Committee OMTS Committee Water 0iemiees Irn'ne Rench /s/.tudith A. Wilson Judith son Chief Administrative Officer OMTS Committee A Public Wastewater and Environmental Management Agency Committed 0 Prowabng the Environment Since 1954 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA V t OBCC ELLI9 AVENUE P O.9O%9127 September26, 1995 NIINTAINVALLEY.CALIFOWIA927299127 nloes2z 11 STAFF REPORT OMTS95-043: Consideration of motion to receive and file OMTS Committee certification for Professional Services to develop an Integrated Emergency Response Plan and award a contract to Communications Performance Group, Inc. for a cost not to exceed $125,000 for the 1995-96 Fiscal Year and a total cost of $312,232. Summary The purpose of disaster preparedness is to identify areas of potential vulnerability, recommend measures to reduce vulnerability, and to develop emergency response procedures for personnel in a disaster situation. Emergency response is a response effort to an unforeseen combination of circumstances that may result in extensive damage, loss, or destruction if not addressed. Emergency response must be performed in a systematic, safe, and competent fashion by individuals within their levels of training, resources, and capabilities. The primary goal of disaster preparedness and emergency response is to protect life, environment, and property. There are numerous regulatory requirements mandating emergency response and disaster preparedness. The Federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), California OSHA (CalOSHA), Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), California EPA (CaIEPA), and the local fire departments have specific regulations governing emergency response. Non-compliance with EPA and CalEPA regulations may result in citations with fines as high as $25,000 per day, per violation, whereas, non-compliance with OSHA and CalOSHA regulations may result in citations but fines are not assessed to government agencies. All citations require immediate corrective action, usually requiring mitigation and the development of the appropriate programs. The Districts do not currently have emergency response plans that are in compliance with the regulations. Backaround The purpose of the 1969 Master Plan (Master Plan) is to develop wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal facility needs for a 30-year planning period. Volume 7 of the Master Plan, entitled "Disaster Preparedness Plan", contains discussions of disaster probabilities and severity scenarios, facility and operations inventories and vulnerability analyses, risk reduction programs, and emergency l OMTS95-043 Page 2 of 6 September 26, 1995 response. Volume 7 contains only an outline of an emergency response program and does not comply with regulatory requirements. Two attempts have been made to expand upon the Master Plan's Emergency Response Program; however, both were portions of seismic-related projects and attempted to address emergencies resulting primarily from earthquakes. A plan of this nature would not have addressed all mandated emergency response planning requirements and would not have been effective in protecting the Districts' personnel or the surrounding communities. Holmes and Narver (HN), the consultant that most recently attempted to develop an emergency response plan, was unable to provide a plan that met all the Districts' needs. The HN plan did not comply with regulatory requirements, was not "user friendly", and did not address the Scope of Work sufficiently. In June 1994, HN requested to be released from the Emergency Response Plan development portion of Job No. P1-44/P2-53 (Seismic Retrofit of Structures) after months of work and great expense to themselves. The Districts did not pay for any portion of the Job related to development of the Emergency Response Plan. Prior to 1995, the management of the hazardous materials, hazardous waste, emergency response and disaster preparedness programs was performed by various divisions that did not have the resources or expertise necessary to manage these programs. The newly-created Safety and Emergency Response Division has been given the authority to develop these programs. The development of an emergency response plan requires extremely labor intensive data collection and utilization, therefore, it is most appropriate that a consultant be retained to complete this project in a timely fashion. Discussion Many of the regulatory requirements for emergency response and disaster preparedness are duplicative. Therefore, Safety and Emergency Response Staff developed a Scope of Work for the development of an Integrated Emergency Response Plan (IERP) that will provide for the protection of Districts' employees, the surrounding communities, and meet all mandated requirements. The IERP will consist of detailed procedures for managing and responding to emergencies resulting from natural and man-made disasters and will be consistent with Orange County's Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS). The Safety and Emergency Response Division will manage the project, which will account for approximately one- third of the Safety and Emergency Response Specialist's hours. Additional Districts' staff will be utilized during all phases of the project for interviews and review of submittals. After Districts' staff receives training, table-top, functional, and full-scale OMTS95-043 Page 3 of 6 September 26, 1995 exercises will be performed following the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and California Office of Emergency Services (OES) guidelines. The proposal process was initiated in May 1995, when staff mailed Request For Qualifications (RFQ) packages to 10 prospective firms. The Districts received a total of six responses, three of which were qualification packages. The three firms, IT Corporation (IT), ERM-West, Inc. (ERM), and Communications Performance Group, Inc. (CPG) were then mailed Request For Proposals (RFP) in August 1995. All three responded with proposals. A selection committee composed of Districts' Safety and Emergency Response Staff was formed to conduct the technical review and evaluation of the proposals submitted by IT, ERM, and CPG. Each proposal was evaluated based on the six criteria listed in Table 1. Table 1 Proposal Criteria Importance Parameter Factor Firm Previous IERPs, Components, Useability, 4.0 Expertise/experience, Planning/procedures, and QA/QC Team Leader IERP experience, Budgeted time, Years of 1.4 experience, Education/registration, and Districts familiarity Team IERP experience, Years of experience, 1.0 Education/registration, and Districts familiarity Project Approach Completeness, Districts' goals, Understanding 1.8 and detail, Scope improvements, and Proximity Scheduling Duration, Understanding of Districts' 1.0 complexities, and Level of detail Proposal Appearance and RFP compliance 0.8 TOTAL 10.0 r OMTS95-043 Page 4 of 6 September 26, 1995 After the technical evaluation was completed, the sealed proposed cost-for-services were opened. Conclusion Based upon the evaluation of the three proposals, the following conclusions can be made: 1. Of the three firms submitting proposals, CPG had the highest technical ranking (Table 2). 2. CPG is the only firm that has extensive experience preparing integrated emergency response plans for facilities that are at least equal in complexity to the Districts. 3. CPG dedicated considerably more hours and percentage of hours to the most critical component of the IERP (planning and procedures) than the other firms. 4. Two firms, IT and ERM, had significant problems with their proposals. IT does not have satisfactory experience preparing integrated emergency response plans. ERM's proposal contained many inaccuracies and did not address the Scope of Work sufficiently. OMTS95-043 Page 5 of 6 September 26, 1995 Table 2 Weighted Rating Proposal Parameter Communications Performance IT Corporation ERM-West Group, Inc. Firm 1649 755 781 Team Leader 386 259 184 Team 161 127 104 Project Approach 599 386 206 Scheduling 223 162 69 Proposal 141 112 68 RESULTS 3159 1801 1412 (4000 points maximum) Work Force Estimate, hours 3336 2293 609 Fee Proposal, $ 312.232' 199,942 99,100 Safety and Emergency RECOMMENDED NOT RECOMMENDED NOT RECOMMENDED Response Division's 1. Proposal was 1. Proposal did not address all 1. Proposal was Incomplete Recommendations and comprehensive and well done. elements of the Scope of Work. and included projects outside Comments 2. Strong previous experience 2. Previous work examples of the scope of work. In the development of were substandard. 2. Previous experience was emergency response plans. limited. ' Negotiated fee. Initial fee proposal was $350,156. { OMTS95-043 Page 6 of 6 September 26, 1995 Staff Recommendation Based upon the conclusions stated above, staff recommends awarding a contract for Professional Services to develop an Integrated Emergency Response Plan to Communications Performance Group, Inc. for an amount not to exceed the budgeted $125,000 in the 1995-96 Fiscal Year and an amount not to exceed $187,232 in the 1996-97 Fiscal Year, for a total amount not to exceed $312,232. A detailed cost summary is included in Table 3. Table 3 Phase' Work Element Labor Hours Cost 1 Needs Assessment 500 $45,780 1 Plan Prototype 224 16,219 1 Plan Outlines 216 18,050 1 Draft Incident Command System 174 15,108 1 Recommendations Report 200 18,312 Phase 1 Subtotal 1314 113,469 2 IERP Volume I - Planning 781 65,193 (50%Submittal) 2 IERP Volume 11 - Procedures 813 69,466 (75% and 90% Submittal) 2 Final IERP and Electronic Copy 143 11,184 (100% Submittal) 2 Spill Prevention and 264 22,759 Countermeasures Plan 2 Printing and Binding 21 1,983 Phase 2 Subtotal 2022 170,585 Phase 1 + Phase 2 Total 3336 284,064 Fixed Profit (9.92%) 28,178 TOTAL CONTRACT, not to exceed $312,232 ' Phase 1 is budgeted in FY 1995-96 and Phase 2 will be budgeted in FY 1996-97. DET:dt g:WpVhMnnicfi eNfplbrd_rpt JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS MEETING AGENDA FOR OCTOBER 25, 1995 Agenda Item (11 )(b)(2): OMTS95-045 Consideration of motion authorizing an increase in Districts' expenditures for in-house analyses supporting the Joint Ultraviolet Pilot Project with Orange County Water District, increasing the Districts' cost for direct labor and material, for an additional amount of $17,000.00, increasing the total authorized amount from $40,000.00 to an amount not to exceed $57,000.00. Summary In April 1993,the Districts'Joint Boards of Directors authorized staff to execute an agreement with the Orange County Water District(OCWD)for pilot testing of ultraviolet(UV) light disinfection technology with estimated costs of$160,000 to be shared equally by the two agencies. The Districts were authorized to spend up to$40,000 on consulting fees and approximately S40,000 on in-house laboratory analyses. The project consisted of three phases; Phase I was designed to characterize the Green Acres Project filtered effluent;Phase II was conducted to determine the UV dosage response curves;and Phase III was incorporated to identify maintenance requirements and fouling rates. The Districts'approved budget was only sufficient to cover Phases I and If. An additional $17,000 is needed to cover direct labor and material costs. Staff Recommendation Consideration of motion authorizing an increase in the expenditures for the Districts'in-house analyses supporting the Joint Ultraviolet Pilot Project between Orange County Water District and the Districts from $40,000 to$57,000 in direct labor and material costs. The original expenditures of S40,000 were authorized in April 1993. OMTS Committee Recommendation The OMTS Committee recommends approval of motion authorizing an increase in the expenditures for the Dishicts'in-house analyses supporting the Joint Ultraviolet Pilot Project between Orange County Water District and the Districts from$40,000 to$57,000 in direct labor and material costs. The original expenditures of S40,000 were authorized in April 1993. Executive Committee Recommendation to the Joint Boards of Directors Consideration of motion authodzing an increase in Districts'expenditures for in-house analyses supporting the Joint Ultraviolet Pilot Project with Orange County Water District,increasing the Districts'cost for direct labor and matedal,for an additional amount of$17,000.00,increasing the total authorized amount from $40,000.00 to an amount not to exceed$57,000.00. nwoDoaasuceswcronnexcve COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 6 el ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA IL9 F a 812 NUF ROX OX September 20, 1995 vwmnm vau£r.tuiMRNIwnnin ezrze.em 01.1 8823C11 STAFF REPORT OMTS95-045: Consideration of motion authorizing an increase in the expenditures for the Districts' in-house analyses supporting the Joint Ultraviolet Pilot Project between Orange County Water District and the Districts from $40,000 to $57,000 in direct labor and material costs. The original expenditures of $40,000 were authorized in April 1993. Refer to April 14, 1993 Board Item (13) (b) (2). Summary The Boards of Directors authorized the Districts to enter into an agreement with Orange County Water District (OCWD) in a pilot study evaluation of ultraviolet (UV) light disinfection technology on April 14, 1993 (Board Item (13) (b) (2)). OCWD's recycled water, the Green Acres Project (GAP) filtered effluent, is disinfected with chlorine. This project evaluates the effectiveness and costs of using UV light technology for disinfecting filtered GAP effluent. This technology could be used to disinfect the effluent from the Orange County Regional Water Reclamation Project (OCR Project). The Districts use recycled water to lower operational costs. That use is estimated at 3.7 million gallons-per-day (mgd) for 1995-96. The project consisted of three phases. Phases I and II of this pilot project have been successfully completed. Additional funds in the amount of $12,000 in direct labor and $5,000 in material costs, which are in the Joint Operating Budget, are needed to complete Phase III of this project. Backoround In the 1989 Master Plan, the Districts identified recycled water as a cost effective way to meet Operations' needs at Plants No. 1 and No. 2. Currently, recycled water is used for cooling the central generation engines and for irrigation purposes. The cost of the potable water is approximately three times the cost of the GAP water. In May 1995, it was projected that the 1995-96 usage of GAP water would be approximately 3.7 mgd. When chlorine is used as a disinfectant, there are applications, such as the polymer make-up water, where the Districts are forced to use potable water due to the presence of chlorine in the recycled water. UV light technology offers an a OMTS95-045 Page 3 September 20, 1995 will be conducted by Districts' Laboratory staff and overtime will not be required. Districts' staff is asking for the authorization to increase the project expenditures for the laboratory analyses from $40,000 to $57,000. This includes both the direct labor and material costs. Results of Phases I and It In Phase I It was determined, through a three-month sampling and analysis of the GAP filtered effluent, that there was no apparent diurnal variation in indigenous bacteria, bacteriophage, human enteric viruses, total organic compounds, total dissolved solids, total hardness, total alkalinity, suspended solids, and iron. In Phase II an 80 to 150 gallon-per-minute UV pilot facility was constructed consisting of three banks of two UV lights each. Different UV doses were evaluated for their efficiency in removing bacteria and viruses in undisinfected GAP filtered effluent which was seeded with a vaccine strain of the poliovirus and bacteriophage. This was used to determine the UV dosage required to remove the viruses as required by California Code of Regulations, Title 22. The Phase II project determined that a minimum UV dosage to achieve compliance with the standard was 130 milliwatts- seconds/centimeter squared. Phase III Phase III is designed to evaluate the maintenance requirements that will be encountered with a three month continuous operation of the UV lamps. Initially the lamps will be run to determine the rate and type of scaling. OCWD will experiment with different cleaning procedures. Once this portion of the study has been completed, the Districts' Laboratory staff will measure how quickly the UV dosage degrades. This will be determined based on the log reduction in the concentration of coliform, coliphage and enteric viruses in the disinfected GAP filtered effluent. The lamps will only be cleaned when consecutive samples for these indicator bacteria and viruses are not reduced to acceptable levels by the UV dosage. The Districts' Laboratory staff will be monitoring these parameters on a weekly basis. Staff Recommends Consideration of motion authorizing an increase in the expenditures for the Districts' in-house analyses supporting the Joint Ultraviolet Pilot Project between Orange County Water District and the Districts from $40,000 to $57,000 in direct labor and material costs. The original expenditures of $40,000 were authorized in April, 1993. Refer to April 14, 1993 Board Item (13) (b) (2). LB:99 01TSUM\BLUESTEM%DM4.nP JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS MEETING AGENDA FOR OCTOBER 25, 1995 Agenda Item (11 )(b)(3): PDC95-31 Consideration of motion to approve, in concept, the Partnering Charter and the Value Engineering Clause to the contract with Margate Construction, Inc., for Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36-2. Summary A few months ago, the Director of Engineering presented information concerning "Partnering". Specifically, the staff requested the committee's conwrrence on using the partnering concept on Job No. P1-36-2, Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1. The committee did concur with the staff to pursue partnering with Margate Construction Company. A partnering workshop was held at the Districts'office on September 11, 1995, which was facilitated by Ventura Consulting Group. The results of that workshop are attached (Attachment 1) in the form of a Partnering Charter. The Districts intend to encourage the foundation of a cohesive partnership with the Districts' Operations, Maintenance, and Engineering staffs, the Contractor, its subcontractors and the designers on P1-36-2. This partnership will be structured to draw on the strengths of each organization to identify and achieve mutual "partnership" goals. The objective is successful completion of the project within the provisions of the Partnering Charter. It is understood that this partnership in no way releases, qualifies or abrogates any of the participating parties legal or contractual obligations with regard to this project. One of the features of Partnering is Value Engineering. Value Engineering is a formed technique by which contractors may suggest methods for performing more economically and share in any resulting savings. Value Engineering attempts to eliminate or modify without impairing essential functions or characteristics, anything that increases construction, operation or support costs. One of the goals which the partnering established was to reduce the final construction costs of the contract. To this end we proposed to establish a Value Engineering clause to this contract which will allow and encourage the Contractor to submit Value Engineering Change Proposals (VECP). A VECP is defined as a proposal that: 1. Requires a change to the contract to implement the change. 1-GBAOClyl1l-c- _ 2. Results in reducing the contract price or estimated cost without impairing essential functions or characteristics. 3. Results in the net savings of the change shared equally between the Contractor and the Districts. PDC Committee Recommendation Accept and approve the Partnering Charter and the addition of the Value Engineering clause to the Contract. Executive Committee Recommendation to the Joint Boards of Directors The Executive Committee concurs with the recommendation of the PDC Committee. J-0(IOLI6SU3BAXIBS11--R SRS:MI: 1.tteife�i?i' ": i ..e:. .t •;'•r D1. :�!e.. v. f,�.r. rss£:. t-i�;�,t { ss�7 .. i,9t}.+e;n.�iiii't •'i: i:r.3'i7lfi.f :i {i. 3.e3liitt�.ii ;:.{t.:fe 'iiii££ ,) d:.:&;. Z @F�i . »s4 F::: ti. er•sspt tiif ft s R' s of ✓ t � x '.: :.t.,. ..' .. . -�{,• at4£„J, .. :.�.b1 t £�.'::: :+'�{,f(if r.'is'£'41r- '�.vSf•{,: s��£s�,:.. :.:+1£e v�,. P i - 3 6 - 2 County Sanitation Districts of =" Orange County `= Partnership Charter :. September 11, 1995 =wr We, the partners of P1-36-2, do hereby commit to carrying out these == goals below as mutually agreed upon: r=. m' #1. Complete close out with flow thru in 24 months. #2. Zero change in contract cost — net change orders and value eng'in �_,• ,,. #3. Facilitates ability of operating staff regarding access. Staff �. educated and included in process. Public recognition and acknowledge ' ment. .<•. r #4. Done right the first time = high quality and mutually agreed upon. a #5. ENR article regarding partnering ;m #6. o unresol ed laim3lnitlt,all pa et�sfi_e(1 "r D tiro �<:7,:•.. -A � s 4t +fF�''r. �££s ,4t, '' to f{t !s lu :3{3Fe .,• s 4 .f+t+.'h ' e DRAFT VALUE ENGINEERING - CONSTRUCTION (a) General -The Contractor is encouraged to develop, prepare, and submit value engineering change proposals (VECP's) voluntarily. The Contractor shall share in any instant contract savings realized from accepted VECP's in accordance with paragraphs below. "Contractor's development and implementation costs" as used in this clause, means those costs the Contractor incurs on a VECP specifically in developing, testing, preparing, and submitting the VECP, as well as those costs the Contractor incurs to make the contractual changes required by Districts acceptance of a VECP. "District costs," as used in this clause, means those agency costs that result directly from developing and implementing the VECP, such as any net increase in the cost of testing, operations, maintenance, and logistic support. The term does not include the normal administrative costs of processing the VECP. "Instant contract savings', as used in this clause, means the estimated reduction in Contractor cost of performance resulting from acceptance of the VECP, minus allowable Contractor's development and implementation costs, including subcontractor's development and implementation costs. "Value engineering change proposal (VECP) means a proposal that - (1) Requires a change to the contract, to implement; and (2) Results in reducing the contract price or estimated cost without impairing essential functions or characteristics; provided, that it does not involve a change - (i) In deliverable and end item quantities only; or (ii) To the contract type only. (b) VECP preparation. As a minimum, the Contractor shall include in each VECP the information described in subparagraphs below. (1) A description of the difference between the existing contract requirement, and that proposed, the comparative advantages and disadvantages of each, a justification when an item's function or characteristics are being altered, and the effect of the change on the end item's performance. 1 Q Value Engineering Page Three (d) Sharing - (1) Rates - The Districts share of savings is determined by subtracting Districts costs from instant contract savings and multiplying the result by .50 percent for fixed price contracts. (2) Payment - Payment of any share due the Contractor for use of a VECP on this contract shall be authorized by a change order to the contract to - (i) Accept the VECP (ii) Reduce the contract price or estimated cost by the amount of instant contract savings, and (iii) Provide the Contractor's share of savings by adding the amount calculated to the contract price or fee. (a) Subcontracts - In computing any adjustment in this contract's price under the paragraph above, the Contractor's allowable development and implementation costs shall include any subcontractor's allowable development and implementation costs clearly resulting from a VECP accepted by the Districts under this contract, but shall exclude any value engineering incentive payments to a subcontractor. The Contractor may choose any arrangement for subcontractor value engineering incentive payments, provided that these payments shall not reduce the District's share of the savings resulting from the VECP. JDL:lh VENTURA CONSULTING GROUP, INC. PI - 3 6 - 2 Orange County Sanitation Districts Partnering Workshop Notes September 11, 1995 Y VENTURA CONSULTING GROUP,INC. P1 -36-2; Orange County Sanitation Districts Partnering Workshop Notes September 11 , 1995 Our paradigms: Owners on: Primes: o underbid to get the job o cheapest and quickest way -- not safest o take advantage of us Engineers: o never wrong o justify their design o design what they're comfortable with Subs: o cut corners to decrease costs o primes take advantage of them o low bid is not necessarily the best quality o don't manage themselves well Engineers on: Primes: o look for big change orders o finish and get out before work is done o want us to do all the work on submittals o inspectors just slow them down o only interested in profit Owners: o endless pot of money o don't understand design process o expect design to be perfect Subs: o don't read plans and specs O Partnership Goals (Big, Hairy, Audacious Goals): #1 . Complete close out with flow thru in 24 months. #2. Zero change in contract cost — net change orders and value eng'ing #3. Facilitates ability of operating staff regarding access. Staff educated and included in process. Public recognition and acknowledgement #4. Done right the first time = high quality and mutually agreed upon. #5. ENR article regarding partnering and in OC Register. #6. No unresolved claims with all partners satisfied -- ------------------------------------------------- #1 . Complete close out with flow thru in 24 months -- How do we get there?: a. Developed a 24 month schedule that optimizes construction techniques and that we're all committed to. 1 . of Tod: meet to identify sequences in construction schedule regarding operational needs. Who: Dave; Ralph; Bob; Mark; John F; Mark E; Jim H; Bob 0; Chris C; Terry K; and, Chuck L. When: on 9/25 at 11 AM 2. by Tom: I will identify areas for major time savings by 9/13 at the precon at 2:30. Will give a preliminary "go" or "no go" or "need to review". 3. of Dave: have a partnership schedule (goal = 24 months) incorp- orating the above ideas done by 10/16 and sent to Tod. 4. by Tod: I will approve NLT 11/1 b. Expedited submittal approvals. 1 . of Tod: have a meeting to identify critical submittals and a process for prioritizing and expediting them. When: 10/26 after construction meeting. Who: Dave; Orange Cty Water, Jack V; Nick A; I d. Expedite material and equipment. 1 . by Chris: O&M manuals will be discussed in submittal meeting on 10/26 — by Dennis: I can give you maintenance. e. Found a way to fund 24 month project. 1 . by John/Dave: we will make sure the dollars are in the budget for next year f. Expedited change orders. 1 . of all: prior to developing an independent written estimate, meet to verbally agree on: a. scope of the change b. is it a change? c. time extension if any d. subs involved e. approval time and process. 2. of all: we will operate with P2-42-2 understanding re. profit and overhead rates; markups and equipment/material. 3. by Terry: minimize T&M and expand lump sum change orders on this project. g. Expedited training requirements. 1 . by Tod: coordinate training requirements NLT 6 months prior to project completion -- develop a job specific plan h. Proactive communicatio and coordination process. 1. by Tod: weekly meetings on Thursdays at 9AM -- will write meeting notes issues will stay on agenda until resolved — notes out NLT end of day on Monday Who attend: Terry; Ralph, Chuck; Mark; Jim; Ralph; Ops (Wade) plus all subs with a current issue. t h. hot line i. VE session with operators 1 . by Dave L: I will take above ideas and develop an "action plant" for the partnership #3. Done right the first time = high quality and mutually agreed upon -- How do we get there?: 1 . of inspectors/contractors: prior to doing major elements of the work, meet to verbally establish mutual acceptance standards and: a. a process for inspection b. identify how inspector can help the contractor c. alternative methods of doing the work 2. by Terry: I will review the weekly schedule and we will take the initiative in scheduling these meetings (above) 3. by inspectors: we will give verbal notice prior to writing a deficiency. #4. No unresolved claims -- all parties satisfied -- How do we get there?: Our normal paradigm about Breakdowns, Obstacles, Mistakes & Conflicts (BOMS) o point the finger o CYA BOMS on this project can be opportunities for: 1 . improvement 2. learning 3. change or even creating a breakthrough 4. develop trust Predictable BOMS on this project: Mary & Dave: we won't place priority on this project given our other commitments. Appendix Value Engineering equipment that the Districts will receive proposals from the contractor on to save money on the project: 1. Aeration equipment change from named equipment to aeration panels 2. Remove walls and roofs from DAF's 3. Change aeration blowers 4. Delete one DAF 5. Provide Eimco equipment to allow deletion of one DAF 6. Resolve questions on the sludge collection equipment 7. Fast track the WAS pumping system enhancements to allow removal of aeration equipment and final clarifiers more flexibly B. Modify/simplify final clarifier drain routing JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS MEETING AGENDA FOR OCTOBER 25, 1995 Agenda Item (11 )(b)(4): OMTS95-041 Consideration of motion to approve, in concept, the construction of a Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) Refueling Station, Job No. P1-51, authorizing staff to loan reserve funds in the 1995-96 budget to build the station; and directing staff to establish an enterprise report forfuture review. Summary Ed Hodges, Director of Maintenance, will give a brief presentation on the attached staff report detailing the costs associated with the operation of a Compressed Natural Gas refueling station. Budget Information When staff put together this years CORF budget, we did not anticipate participating in this project and, therefore, did not allocate funds for this project. There are sufficient funds available in the existing reserves or from postponed projects, therefore, staff is requesting that sufficient funds be transferred to allow us to build this station with the understanding that as revenues generated by this project begin to be realized, they will be used to reduce the gallonage charge. Staff Recommendation Staff believes this project is worthwhile and recommends that the Committee approve it and authorize staff to reallocate construction funds in the 1995-96 budget. FAHR Committee Recommendation to Executive Committee The Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee recommends the Executive Committee approve the Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) Refueling Station, Job No. Pt-51, authorize staff to transfer reserve funds in the 1995-96 budget, and direct staff to establish an "enterprise report for future review. Executive Committee Recommendation to Joint Boards of Directors The Executive Committee concurs with the recommendation of the FAHR Committee. J 1W VpxBSMC.flfbttBS1184.CVR v September 25, 1995 ' mm STAFF REPORT OMTS96-041: Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) Refueling Station BACKGROUND At the September OMTS Committee meeting, staff presented the proposal that was submitted to the South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD)for some of the AS 2766 funds. On Friday, September 15, 1995, we received notification from the SCAQMD that our proposal was one of two proposals they would be funding. In our proposal we had requested $447,662 from the SCAQMD. The total funding we will be receiving is $447.000. Authorization was also received at the September OMITS Committee meeting to put together a second proposal for additional AB 2766 funds. There is $7.5 million available for an Electric Vehicle project which staff will be considering for a possible proposal. We will keep the Directors advised. SUMMARY As we discussed in September, the Sanitation Districts will own and operate a CNG refueling station for use by not only Pima Gro but, the Sanitation Districts' future CNG fleet, the cities, school districts and the public. The cost for this station is estimated not to exceed $835,374. Attachment"A" of this report is an estimated cost breakdown for constructing this station. The station wilt be built in stages as the load on the station increases. When operational, this refueling station will become a revenue stream for the Sanitation Districts. Attachment"B" to this report Is a proposed schedule to design, permit and construct this facility. The cost to do this work is part of the Gas Company's responsibility and was included as an in-kind contribution on its part. The Gas Company, will prepare the plans and specifications, we will then bid the job (consistent with Districts policies) and will be bringing it back to the PDC for action. Also attached for your guidance and information is a Pro Forma Analysis (see Attachment "C"). The assumptions for this analysis are as follows: A. ANNUAL LOAD 1. The station will start out with ten trucks in 1996, will grow to 20 trucks in the year 2000 and will further increase to 30 trucks in the year 2005. Each truck will fill up with 50 gallons of fuel, 4 daystweek, 52 weeks/year. The conversion factor used per diesel gallon equivalent(DGE) is 1.35. 2. In 1998, the Sanitation Districts will begin replacing its old fleet with CNG vehicles and this rate will increase 5% per year until the year 2005. 3. The City of Fountain Valley will begin using this station in 1997 and its use will increase at a rate of 5% per year until the year 2000. CSDOC 0 C.O. Sox8127 9 Fountain Valley,CA927284127 0 (714)962-2411 a OMTS95.041 Page 2 of 3 September 25, 1995 4. The public will begin using the facility in the year 1999 and their use will increase at a rate of 5% per year thereafter. B. STATION RECOVERY 1. The Sanitation Districts will enter into a long-term contract to provide fuel to the haulers at a rate of$0.91/gallon. 2. The Sanitation Districts will provide fuel to itself at the current rate for unleaded fuel which is $0.94/gallon. 3. The Sanitation Districts will provide fuel to the cities at a rate of$0.95/gallon. 4. The Sanitation Districts will provide fuel to the public at a rate of$1.00/gallon. Please note: The Sanitation Districts would be wise to tie its fuel contracts to a differential based on the price of unleaded gasoline (which is projected to increase significantly as the manufacturers are mandated to produce the new reformulated CARB It fuels). C. STATION EXPENSES 1. The cost for a them of natural gas is widely traded on the open spot market. In August 1995, this cost was $0.13 per therm and in this past winter it has ranged as high as $0.23 per therm. For purposes of this analysis, the worst case was assumed and $0.23 per therm was used. 2. Taxes are the true cost of the current Federal and State tax. 3. Interstate Demand is the cost to get the therm of gas from the well head to our plant. 4. SoCal Transportation cost is the cost SoCalGas charges to use their transportation lines. 5. Fixed Station Maintenance Costs assume that the Districts privatize the maintenance of the facility and not use Districts staff. D. NET INCOME 1. Total expenses minus the station recovery. For purposes of this analysis it was assumed that all $835,374 would be spent in the first year. In actuality, this station would be built in stages to handle the load as it increased due to an increase in the demand on the station. Nevertheless, under this worst-case scenario, the station still shows an internal rate of return of 8%. 4 OMTS96-041 Page 3 of 3 September 25, 1995 BUDGET INFORMATION When staff put together this year's CORF budget, we did not anticipate participating in this project and, therefore, did not allocate funds for this project. There are sufficient funds available in the existing reserves or from postponed projects, therefore, staff is requesting that sufficient funds be transferred to allow us to build this station with the understanding that as revenues generated by this project begin to be realized, they will be used to reduce the gallonage charge. RECOMMENDATION Staff believes this project Is worthwhile and recommends that the Committee approve it and authorize staff to reallocate construction funds in the 1995-96 budget. EEH:cm R:\WPD0CW1MEHWMTSl95-041 SR ATTACHMENT 'A' u F. NGV Fueling Station Cost Estimate NGV Fueling Station Cost Estimate CSDOC NGV FUELING STATION PROPOSAL COST ESTIMATE SoCalGas Components Estimate In-Kind EQUIPMENT Electnc Transformer $ 14,000 Electric Switchgear 30,000 Meter Set Assembly 5,000 $5,000 Bus Offloading Panel 1,000 Dryer 40,000 Compressor 250,000 Compressor Enclosure 40,000 ASME Storage Vessel 33,000 Card Reader 16,000 CNG Dispenser 85,000 Minor Components 12,000 Sales Tax (8.25%) 43,395 Freight 7,000 Subtotal $576,395 CONSTRUCTION Construction Management $ 34,500 $34,500 Electric Tie-in 0 Gas Tie-in 50,000 $50,000 Construction 91,500 Subtotal $176,000 ENGINEERING Design $ 25,000 Project/Construction Management 20,000 Quality Assurance 10,000 Purchasing 5,000 Subtotal $ 60,000 SUBTOTAL ALL COMPONENTS $812,395 Contingency (20 percent) 162,479 TOTAL* $974,874 $89,500 Rough Order of Magnitude Fs6mete induces N-20 percent to amount for sne-specific design requirements. Counfq Sanitation Disfrtcts of Orange County • Appendix F I'VITICAL DITC IRO S TASKS 'Mu If Is H 1l it me 8. X If 11 to It " . non I. ............................Widi......................... --- -—------------ ....I 3 —----- ............................. DORPROMOM * .T . .. I ...................... ........ . ...... ..... ...... .............. ... . .... . .. .. . .... -!.T! ............. . . .. ....... ..... pA .......... .................................... .. ............... ..... ............ . I........... . .... . ............ ... Im 4 01 ............ ..........I.., ............................................. . ....... ... ...... .. ................................... ............. ...... ........ ..............................I ...... .. . ..... ..... 77=1 = = ..................9.................. .......... ..... ..... . .... . .. .. I........ . ......... ............... ...... ........... ......................... ...... .... ..- .............................. ...... .. �CAL BWP. ljm!"S[L4IGVIOM.................... .................*.......... ... . ..... .. ..... ...................I .. ...... ..... ...............I........... ..... ..... ...... . ........ ........ ............ .... 3 .................I ........ ----------------- .......... .... ...... ...................................I ................... ....................................... I..... ........... .............................. . .....I...... ... ....I .. ............ .... .....II ........... ..... ............. . . ....... . YMAMDOIM[ "a.... ... . ................ 4 . I'M ............. ... ...... ..... I........................... ........... ..... .... ........I ...... ......-............... - .... ............ ................................... .. ............................................ ..... .................................................... L MApMVI[Lf YROM UIRIIVM . . $. ; ............. ..... ...... 4 ..............I ...... ...... .... ...... .......I.................................. ....... ....................L-m ­ ........................................ ... ..... ...... ..............I............. ...... ........ .......... ........................ PERMITS Im ............. ....................1,M ... .....I_... ........ ....................... .... CONSTRUCTION------*. .................... lRA?VCMMWTAWW ... .............. ... .... .......... .. ..... ..... ...... ...... ...... ....... ... ...... IlX ..... ... ............................ ............... ....... ... .... ............ ............. .... ..... ...............m ................ ..... ...... ................................................ ...... . ...... ...... ..... -.... ...... ..................................... .....1..... ................................. ...... ................... .............. .... .... ...... .. ...... .... ......... .....•..... .. .. .... ............ .. ........... .. .................. ... .... . ... .................L.... ..... ...... . ....... . ..... ......................................................... .... ........... ..................... .................. .......... . .....................----i... .... .... .... ................................................... .... ................. ... ............ ... ...... ... ..... .... .. ........................ .......................... ..... ...... ..... ..... > ....... ...... ...... .. ..... ...... ........... ........... ... ...............- A . ....... ..... ..... ..... ............. ....... ..... ... ........... .... .................7 ........................... .................. ............ .. ............... .............. ................... ...... ............ .... m ........... ....... ..... .. ...... .. .. ... PrNamu 1 WlW 12:13 CSDOC NO STATION INCOME STATEM 1 19W 1998 t 20D1 3002N 2004 2007 2008 200B 3010 Lead HAULERS 14DA0 140.40 1A0.40 1M.40 MAO MM 2802 2803 42120 42120 42120 02120 42120 42120 Mnwl Load Ne -OCSD am am am 833 7.17 7.91 8.30 8.30 $30 830 830 em wtll- d M -CRIES SOm 52.50 5.13 57AS 57-M 57.88 57.88 57.85 VAS WAS 57.5 S7.BB 57m -OTHER 5.00 525 5.51 5.79 838 8.M Tu 7.38 7.76 8.14 am TOM ANNUALLOAD 1M.M 190A0 198m 208.72 350.44 351.02 351.64 352.97 4B4.08 494.42 4Bt.n 485.14 495SJ 49523 ShBen -MAULERS 81 94A4 128 IMM 13834 238M 236.82 M7m M7A7 M723 333m M27 M51 333.78 334.021 934m SdtlonR -OCSDtWR41M 4m 520 5.46 5.73 am S32 1 6.54 627 897 627 897 697 697 5latlon Ra -CR0:5 42.41 4453 46.76 49.10 49.10 49.10 49.10 49.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 48.10 0.10 Sm R -OTHER 1. 4.46 4. 492 5.17 5.43 SID am 628 8m e.at 727 7.84 TOTAL STATB3M REo0VERT 81A4 IM75 T8 1 77 285.48 2B6.]7 28721 198.91 29938 3Sm 39502 398.17 398.75 307M 398m MS� 1 d 02]Ahmn 3228 p.7B 4572 4755 80.60 M.74 BOm Btm 81.18 113.64 11].73 113m 113.5 11]Al 11/D7 wbn3.Od Mra;.tt B.BO 12.45 13.p 1438 21.% 21A1 21A8 2138 21.81 2832 28.38 28.0 2t1.15 28.49 285/ Demand .041Bien11 5.62 7.82 7.95 827 14.02 14A4 14A7 14m 14.12 19.79 19.79 19.79 19.81 19.82 Ism m rM6en Coffi am 17.14 17.89 19.M 3154 31M 31m 31.71 31.77 M41 44So MM MM 44m Mm ham lftn nw 20m 18m 18m lam 1Bm 1Bm 18m 18m lam law 18m law 1840 18m 18m ShclOtl Melnlenanw 0.00 om 0.00 Om am Om Om Om 0.00 am om Om Om a00 om A3SkwN9m 1221 12.74 13M 22.M 22m R54 E-M 22m 31.67 3l M 31.72 31. 4 31.76 31.79 p0.00 om am om am am Om Om Om Om am Om Om om Om w D4du0m 0m 0.00 Om om am om 0m am Om am am Om Om OOD Om suon .a0 0.00 0.a0 am O.00 0m Om 0.00 MOD 0.00 0.00 OM am am Om TOTAL EXPENSES 8333 11120 11524 130m 16/97 18628 188.82 1869] 18834 2%.8) 258.05 25824 25.44 2Sm 2SA7 NETINCOME 1 1131 SBm 57.75 75.74 10735100.08 108.70 109.s4 11U.02 1M23 139.57 139.99 1M31 1M.71 141.13 CUMMUTATNE NETRlCOME 1 1131 70AS 13BA1 21434 321.84 429.92 538A2 847m 75 R W721 1008.78 1178.72 1317m 1457.74 1598d7 C/SH RMSTATEMENT NET INCOME ($I.Wa 1131 5956 67.75 75.74 IUM IMM 108.70 1034 110M 130231 Mal 1Sm 14031 14D. 1 141.13 DEPRECIA710N 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 EPAd Ta Deductlen 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O CuB Flow 1131 5956 67.75 15.74 10750 loom 108.70 Imu 1107M 1]923 1]9 139m 1M31 10.71 141.13 OMerrWRall,wftO 8% n 45S6 11311 NMI 67.75 75.741 107m fOB.oe 108.70 10931 /10.02 13823 1395] 1]9m 1M.]t 1M.71 1/1.t] m z Pa 1 W• JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING OCTOBER 25, 1995 Agenda Item (11)(b)(5): FAHR95-25 Consideration of Resolution No. 95-105, repealing Resolution No. 95-54 pertaining to Classification, Compensation, and Other Terms, Conditions, Rules and Regulations of Employment, reflecting changes occurring in legislation and labor law, and required insurance coverages. Summary At the May 24, 1995 meeting, the Boards adopted Resolution No. 95-54 providing for classification, compensation, and other terms, conditions, rules and regulations of employment. This comprehensive resolution replaced Resolutions 79-20 and 79-21 and other resolutions written and adopted from time to time. In addition to simplify compiling existing resolution language, several provisions were amended to reflect changes occurring in both legislation and labor law. Insurance limits for Executive Management employees personal vehicles were also raised. Staff and General Counsel have reviewed Resolution 95.54, and are proposing amendments to reflect staffing changes in the 1995-96 Budget previously approved by the Boards, further changes in legislation or labor practice, and policy statements that more accurately portray Districts' managements' new direction. Staff Recommendation Adopt Resolution No. 95-105 on the basis that there are no substantive changes in the level or cost of entitlements over previously adopted resolutions. - FAHR Committee Recommendation to Executive Committee The Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee recommends the Executive Committee recommend the Joint Boards adopt Resolution No. 95-105 on the basis that there are no substantive changes in the level or cost of entitlements over previously adopted resolutions. Executive Committee Recommendation to the Joint Boards of Directors The Executive Committee concurs with the recommendation of the FAHR Committee, and recommends that the limits for uninsured motors be increased to the same limits for liability. J.1WPWLHSl40BSALT@11WL R �n 1 October 11, 1995 STAFF REPORT FAHR95-25: REVISION OF RESOLUTION 95-54 PERTAINING TO CLASSIFICATION, COMPENSATION, AND OTHER TERMS, CONDITIONS, RULES AND REGULATIONS OF EMPLOYMENT On May 24, 1995, the Boards adapted Resolution 95-54 providing for classification, compensation, and other terms, conditions, rules and regulations of employment. This comprehensive resolution replaced Resolutions 79-20 and 79-21 and other resolutions written and adopted from time to time. In addition to simply compiling existing resolution language, several provisions were amended to reflect changes occurring in both legislation and labor law. Staff and General Counsel have reviewed Resolution 95-54, and are proposing amendments to reflect staffing changes in the 1995-96 Budget previously approved by the Boards, further changes in legislation or labor practice, and policy statements that more accurately portray Districts management's new direction. The proposed revision of Resolution 95-54 is attached. Each revision is highlighted by shading, and summarized below by section. Only those sections involving proposed revisions are discussed, with the exception of non-substantive technical or style corrections. If an additional entitlement or cost is involved, the impact is indicated. Emolovee Employee Bargaining Units' MOU dates and periods are deleted as they Units. were adopted in Resolution 95-54. Definitions. Initial and Promotional probationary period definition amended to provide that "at-will" employees do not serve a probationary period. Section 2. Employee Group exhibits are amended to reflect deletion of the Confidential bargaining unit. Section 3. Reference to the Executive Management Group is clarified. Section 4. Amended to authorize the General Manager to employ Executive Management employees on an "at-will" basis, to enter into an employment agreement with such employees, and to periodically adjust their compensation within the specified salary range. CS DOC 0 P.O.Box 8127 0 Fountain Valloy.CA 92 72 0.8127 0 T.I. (714)962-2411 0 FAX(714)962-3954 FAHR95-25 Page 2 October 11. 1995 Section 5. Effective date of the organizational listing and exhibit references are revised. Section 6. Contains conforming language to provide that "at-will" employees do not serve a probationary period; "termination" changed to "released". Section 7. Exhibit references are revised. Section 8. Delegates authority for approving initial salary offers beyond the midpoint of an approved range to the General Manager; also authorizes General Manager to offer additional vacation to high level prospective employees if necessary to attract qualified candidates. Section 10. Reference to the Executive Management Group is clarified. Section 11. Removes Executive Management employees from the Management Performance Review Program to conform with Section 40's authority for the General Manager to set the salary of"at-will"employees anywhere in the range. Section 12. Provides for exception of"at-will" employees. Section 14. Reference to Executive Management Group is clarified. Section 20. Deletes superfluous language. Section 50. Incorporates provisions of Resolution 95-81 concerning deferred compensation. Section 51. Reference to the Executive Management Group is clarified; eligible expenses for the Benefits Option Plan are clarified. Section 66. Clarifies that "at-will" employees may be released without cause. Sections 98 through 101. Amends and incorporates the provisions of Resolution 83-77 regarding the reemployment of former Districts employees; provides that former Districts employees may not perform work on Districts projects for a period of one year after leaving the Districts' employment. Section 103. Provides that approved MOU provisions shall prevail over resolution provisions in the event of a conflict. FAHR95-25 Page 3 October 11, 1995 Staff Recommendation Adopt Resolution 95- on the basis that there are no substantive changes in the level or cost of entitlements over previously adopted resolutions. GGH:lc J:\W PGOC\FIN\CRANE\FPC.WGIFAHR.MSTAFF.RPTSRFAHR9525 Attachment RESOLUTION NO. 9554 PROVIDING FOR CLASSIFICATION, COMPENSATION AND OTHER TERMS, CONDITIONS, RULES AND REGULATIONS OF EMPLOYMENT A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, RELATING TO THE CLASSIFICATION, COMPENSATION AND OTHER TERMS, CONDITIONS, RULES AND REGULATIONS OF EMPLOYMENT OF DISTRICTS' EMPLOYEES AND REPEALING RES66UTIONS 7-9 20 AND 79 21, AS AMENDED, AND ALL; RESOLUTIONS 0 . .. ., C1PORTIONS 4THATW . AREIN CONFLICT HEREWITH . ... .. .. . .. . . ..... ... WHEREAS, the Distdets' management Feffesentatives have Meshed agreements, as evidensed fel{ewe; Engineering VOW04 11126/03 4112V06 Ope.tieasand Ma:nt9Aa ,8-^ 612619il 4 lgsw 4 1��vpo fYe46ssien_' Gmup 16I4^++,94 021&1/^' ne.--0113.,e-, Superi:sery GFeup 10AQ104 MY011n„ n4ic.un NOW THEREFGR� The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: That the following rules and regulations be established to govern classification, compensation and other terms, conditions, rules and regulations of employment for all persons except the General Counsel, but including Executive Management and Management employees, employed by the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, by and through the Joint Administrative Organization. 200DMn9 m66 r TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE PAGE I. Definitions 1 IL Basic Salary Ranges 2 III. Classification/Positions/Salaries 2 IV. Probationary Employees 4 V. Compensation 4 VI. Overtime Pay- Non-Exempt 6 VII. Additional Compensation- Exempt 6 Vill. Shift Differential Pay 7 IX. Standby Pay 7 X. Call Back Pay 7 XI. Working Out of Class Pay 8 XII. Vacation 8 XIII. Sick Leave 8 XIV. Personal Leave a XV. Conferral of Leave 10 XVI. Workers Compensation Leave 10 XVII. Jury Duty 10 XVill. Witness Leave 10 XX Military Leave of Absence 11 XX. Leave of Absence Without Pay 11 XXI. Medical and Family Leave 11 XXII. Bereavement Leave 12 XXlll. Holidays 12 XXIV. Insurance 12 XXV. Deferred Compensation 14 )DWI. Benefits Option Plans 14 XXVII. Executive Management Vehicle Allowance 15 XXVIII. Uniforms 15 XXUL Retirement 15 XXX. Severance Pay 16 XXXI. Working Hours 16 XXXII. Layoff Procedure 16 XXXIII. Discipline 17 XXXIVV, Grievance Procedure 18 XXXV. Problem Solving Procedure 20 XXXVI. Attendance 20 XXXVII. Medical Examination 21 XXXVIII. Light Duty 21 XXXIX. Substance Abuse 21 XL. Rideshare Program 22 XLI. Nondiscrimination in Employment 24 XLII. Sexual Harassment 24 XLIII. Smoke-free Work Environment 24 XLIV. Employment of Former Employees 25 XLV. Miscellaneous Provisions 25 2DO04WIS lnes_i I. DEFINITIONS Regular Full-time employees regularly work an 80 hour bi-weekly pay period for an indefinite period of time. Regular full-time employees are entitled to benefits as set forth in the various Memoranda of Understanding and elsewhere in this resolution. Part-time employees regularly work less than 80 hours in a bi-weekly pay period for an indefinite period of time. Part-time employees are not entitled to benefits. Limited Term/Temporary employees are assigned to work 80 hours or less in a bi-weekly pay period for an irregular or indeterminate period of time. Temporary employees are not entitled to benefits. Contract employees are those individuals who provide a unique or special service to the Districts through an independent contractual relationship, and who exercise completely independent judgment with regard to the performance of the work. Individuals in this category do not have an employee-employer relationship with the Districts, and are not entitled to benefits unless specifically provided in their contract. Non-Exempt employees who are covered by the minimum wage and overtime provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act as amended. Such employees, because of the type of work that they perform and their earnings level, are subject to receiving overtime pay in addition to any entitlement otherwise provided for in applicable Memoranda of Understanding or this resolution. Exempt employees who are not covered by the minimum wage and overtime provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act as amended. Such employees are considered exempt by virtue of their duties in conformance with the Act's definition of Executive, Administrative and Professional responsibilities. Initial Probationary Period, includes the first six months of employment with the Districts. This period is regarded as an extension of the hiring process, and provides an opportunity for both the employee and the Districts management to assess over a substantial period of time whether or not the hiring decision was appropriate. Probationary employees become regular full-time employees upon successful completion of their probationary period and approval form as provided by the Director of Human Resource. Promotional Probationary Period includes either the six months or ninety day period, depending on applicable MOU provisions, immediately following the date of a promotion. This period is regarded as an extension of the selection process, and provides an opportunity for both the employee and the Districts management to assess over a substantial period of time whether or not the decision was appropriate. °f =K ��%Brls do nqj aer<va BprOm666M prgb Pgryary $ ' Resignation is a voluntary separation, including: resignation with or without notice; an unauthorized absence of three or more consecutive working days; failure to return from leave of absence as arranged; failure to return from layoff upon recall. Release is a separation in which the employee is not qualified for the type of work assigned and no other more suitable assignment is available. Release usually results from no fault of the employee. faye��S�Emp eruntg sn initial° r >ri�yti8 isa 20(gLW+a +rise_+ 1 Layoff is a release of employees when funds or work at a specific skill level is no longer available. , Discharge is a separation in which the employee is removed from the payroll for violation of standards of employee conduct, violation of safety regulations, documented unsatisfactory job performance or other proper cause. Termination date is considered to be the last day actually worked by the employee irrespective of any additional pay they may receive. II. BASIC SALARY RANGES Section 1. There are hereby established in the Joint Administrative Organization the basic salary ranges set forth on Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part of this resolution. III. CLASSIFICATIONS, POSITIONS AND SALARIES Section 2 There are hereby established in the Joint Administrative Organization the classifications, number of positions and their respective salary ranges or hourly rates, as set forth on Exhibit 'B-1" through "B-9" inclusive, attached hereto and made a part of this resolution, effective on the dates set forth thereon. Upon the effective date of the agreement with the Orange County Employee Retirement System to implement the retiree medical health premium offset program, salary ranges for all employee classifications shall be increased one percent in accordance with the provisions of Section 47 of this resolution. In addition, salary ranges will be further adjusted in accordance with the following schedule. Employee Group Exhibit No. Adi. Percent Eff, Date Administrative & Clerical B-1 0.0 11-26-93 3.0 11-25-94 3.0 11-24-95 Engineering B-2 0.0 11-26-93 3.0 11-25-94 3.0 11-24-95 Technical Services B-3 0.0 11-26-93 3.0 11-25-94 3.0 11-24-95 Operations & Maintenance B-4 0.0 11-26-93 3.0 11-25-94 n�'[' 3.0 11-24-95 Ganfiden B r go 4 26 92 ag 44 260 2ooa 19 2 17766 1 3.9 47-24-Q6 Professional B 0.0 07-08.94 3.0 07-07-95 3.0 07-05-96 Supervisory Bj? 0.0 07-08-94 3.0 07-07-95 3.0 07-05-96 Executive Management B471'. 0.0 07-08-94 3.0 07-07-95 3.0 07-05-96 Management B-8 0.0 07-08-94 3.0 07-07-95 3.0 07-05-96 Part-Time, Hourly and B-9 0.0 07-08-94 Unrepresented 3.0 07-07-95 3.0 07-05-96 Section 3. Wage adjustments for employees in the Professional, Supervisory; and Executive Management '-I,.. 0 Groups are awarded from a "merit pool" amount established annually by the hoards andcated to each department in an amount proportional to the salary budget of employees included with the Professional, Supervisory and-Executive Warqg;@MVWO Groups. This pool amount is awarded to individual employees based upon their performance as determined by the Management Performance Review Program. Employees in the Professional, Supervisory end- Management 0 MIff%@ft Groups are not entitled to receive wage adjustments as a result of range adjustments, except to the extent their salary falls outside the range limits. Further, assignment of individual salaries into the top quartile of "E" ranges is limited to 20 percent of the employees in the Professional, Supervisory;and-Executive Management Groups. Section 4. The General Manager is hereby authorized to employ and assign persons as needed to occupy the positions established in Section 5 herein and to exercise supervision over all persons in accordance with the provisions of this resolution and to terminate, for cause, the employment of any regular full time employee employed under the provisions herein. All other employees, , probationary',part-time, limited term/temporary and contract may be terminated at the Districts sole discretion. � a s, I�a, fiipld9 ,� " eMo'a�ent"�rrtlp ees, " ear tat �� pa�,c c� ,�rijraat � ys # to e :f em o e+3s��w,ha arrQ�t rued'-"ak iA a of a� rd' rIs Section 5. The current organizational listing of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Joint Administrative Organization, designated Exhibit"C", and dated July4,4903�%p is attached hereto and made a part of this resolution. Exhibit "C' sets forth the oepartments and divisions of the Joint Administrative Organization and designates the maximum number of ]00ae0a19 1770 1 3 authorized positions In each organizational unit and classifications, except as provided below, and as subject to amendment from time to time by the Boards of Directors. The Districts are governed by the provisions of the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act, "FLSA", and in accordance therewith, after study and evaluation of the duties and responsibilities of all job classifications do hereby establish those classifications that are within the Executive Management, _a' Supervisory and Professional Groups all as set forth on Exhibits "";," through "B- gT.", inclusive, as exempt from the provisions of the FLSA. If,in the determination of the General Manager, qualified applicants are not available to fill an open position, the General Manager shall have the authority to fill the position of a lower classification or pay level until such time as qualified applicants are available. IV. PROBATIONARY EMPLOYEES Section 6. BS'�.IS ) , Ydx persons employed by the Olstricts shaft be deemed probationary employees for a period of six months from the data of hire. The probationary period may be extended by the Dlstrcls for cause by advising the employee prior to the expiration of the six-month period. Said cause shall relate to the need for a further assessment of the individual's abilities to satisfactorily perform the duties required for thelrjob classification. Probationary employees are not deemed to be regular, full-time employees until completion of the probationary period and may be lerminaled'($7` by the Districts at any time during the probationary period and without cause. Said employeesa all serve at the will of the Districts during this period. In the event of ten*RatientJ6§, of a probationary .... employee, the employee shall not be entitled to receive any reverence pay. ,U)i "i'4 �'�°e i" f$ i1 : 'fl" i ft.9# ; A'a_"11 provisions of this Resolution shall apply to probationary employees. with the exception of the Article on Severance Pay. Said employees are also not deemed to be members of employee representative organizations. V. COMPENSATION Section 7. Nor-Exempt employees shall be compensated at an hourly rate within the salary range authorized for the classification in which they are employed as set forth in Exhibits "B-1"through .R-4" and "94'. Exempt employees shall be compensated at a monthly rate within the salary range authorized for the classification in which they are employed as set forth in. Exhibits "B-q" through ""?r Section B. Salary offers beyond the midpoint of a range require prior approval by the K1e�'FC � , f*rt'IBa tvf13�' flei=�f�'l3:�fii��3��Ak'� 4 SraLa anp if`e'�xecgLGe Mareine�t.elTlp74yee�tt thri gent,„D'�„� 'aV NjanegeTMsu �i' �sa�,�°satt� Ah�`�npp>~� 4'�n�dar�; ,fie �' ar'""`j�g�t• Shan a rtdafjapfx1d11sY+dn�ppdfgtmelp?ifa Bailbggpnrgnely res'on Itq�r�r peroo 3ara,4t New employees who are in class) leahons � bargaining units other than the Pro/esaionah-ar Supervisor & Y� nT " .<. Groups who successfully complete their Probationary Penod and are recommentled for eonlinued employment as regular employees are eligible for consideration of a salary adjustment of up to one step (5.5%) effective on the first day of the pay period that follows the date of completion of the Probationary Period (normally 26 weeks). The Salary Review date for subsequent annual reviews is established as the first day of that pay period following the date probation was successfully completed. Section 9. Employees other than Professional, Supervisory and Executive Management 0,101, > who are not at the top of the salary range for their classification are eligible for consideration of an annual salary adjustment of up to one step (5.5%) on their Salary Review date, provided their performance satisfactorily meets expectations. Annual performance reviews shall be completed on a forth provided by the Director of Human Resource8. Section 10. Employees who earn a promotion are entitled to a promotional increase of at least 5.5%, or to the base of the new range, which ever is greater, upon the effective date of the promotion. If an employee has not successfully completed his or her Promotional Probationary Period on their Salary Review date, any adjustment resulting from that annual review will be delayed until such time as the probationary period is completed. Promotions to classifications not in the Professiona and Supervisory t! i[v®,Marra enf:ard,'M, Group establish a H:. ._ 4�. new Salary Review dale. Section 11. Employees who are hired into Professional, Supervisory arid-Executive Management a0di M8i1" 2 ( Group positions with "E" salary ranges shall be offered a salary at or near the minimum of the range unless their level of background, expertise or prior earnings result in a requirement for a salary greater than the minimum. The determination of an appropriate salary should also consider relationships to other employees in the same classification and to employees supervised, if any. WL),1 �. Employees in "E" range classifications serve a Probationary Period of six months and receive a comprehensive performance evaluation at the end of that period , { „t Employees who suooessfuf�y coot use their probation are eligible or a salary a lustment subsequent -duly in accordance with the provisions of the Management Performance Review Program established by separate action of the Boards of Directors and as amended from time to time. Ut ,wr?.A� l J Aan annual performance review is completed for all employees in "E" range classifications in accordance with the provisions of the Management Performance Review Program. Performance based salary adjustments lewd MOM occur on the first day of the first pay period in July, and may be prorated based upon the date of hire, promotion, or last increase in those instances where the individual has not concluded their probation as of July 1. Employees in "E" range classifications who earn promotions to a new"E" range classification will normally be offered a salary below the midpoint of the range that is commensurate with their level of training and expertise, prior earnings, and in an appropriate relationship to other employees in the same classification and to employees supervised. The new salary will normally represent an increase of at least 5.5 percent, but not exceed the third quartile of the range for the new classification. Employees in "E"range classifications are not entitled to a salary adjustment at the conclusion of the Promotional Probationary Period. If the employee's probation period has not concluded as of July 1, the performance based salary adjustment is deferred until such time as probation is successfully concluded. ! Section 12. In the event the duties and responsibilities of a position are allocated to a lower paid classification in the course of implementing the findings of a classification study, the salary of the incumbent of that position shall remain unchanged (Y-rated) in accordance with the following table: ]xgo-1 19 5 111a8_t Years of Service Tenn of Y-rate 0-3 6Months 4 -5 1 year 6- 10 2years 11 -20 3 years 20 or More 4 years The Y-rate shall remain in effect until the salary range for the new classification equals or exceeds the employee's Y-rated salary, or until the tern of the Y-rate expires in accordance with the table above. If the Y-rate expires before the employee's salary falls within the range of the new classification, the employee shall be placed on the step of the new range nearest but not more than the Y-rated salary. Employees become eligible for merit increases and range adjustments when the Y-rate is no longer in effect. Employees who request a voluntary reduction are not entitled to a Y-rate. PhreaM, tyo» at?aAI� E�feMGel�fanaga"'s pls. VI. OVERTIME PAY-NON-EXEMPT EMPLOYEES Section 13, Non-exempt employees who qualify for overtime compensation for work beyond their normal schedule shall, at the employee's discretion, either be paid one-and-a-half times their regular rate of pay, or be granted compensatory time off CCTO") at the rate of one-and-one-half hour for every hour worked for up to 30 hours worked per calendar year. Such CTO must be scheduled off during the year in which it is earned. All overtime hours worked in excess of thirty per calendar year shall, at the discretion of Districts' management, either be paid at one-and-one-half times the regular rate of pay, or by compensatory time off at the rate of one-and-one-half hours for every hour worked. Normally, employees who accumulate in excess of fifty hours compensatory time off, without regard to the elective compensatory time off referred to in the preceding paragraph, will be scheduled to take such time off or be paid for the excess accumulated compensatory time off at the discretion of the Districts' management. For good reason, the Department Head, with the concurrence of the Director of Human Resources, may allow compensatory time to be accumulated in excess of fifty hours. When an employee's work schedule requires that they work on an observed holiday, the employee may opt to be paid at two-and-one-half times their regular rate of pay for the holiday or to be paid at one-and-one-half times their regular rate and receive an amount of Holiday Compensatory Time Off equivalent to the number of hours in the shift. Normally, employees that accumulate in excess of fifty hours of Holiday Compensatory Time Off will be scheduled to take such excess time off or be paid for the excess accumulated Holiday Compensatory Time Off at the convenience of the Districts. For good reason, the Department Head, with the concurrence of the Director of Human Resources, may allow Holiday Compensatory Time Off to be accumulated in excess of fifty hours. VII. ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION -EXEMPT EMPLOYEES Section 14, Employees in the Professionaland Supervisory ,';i is ", � t Groups will be eligible to receive additional compensation at their re" air rate of pay for perfor ing extraordinary service of at least four hours with regard to activities of a prolonged nature involving: major non-emergency facilities failures or shutdowns; major tie-ins of newly constructed facilities; major start-ups of new facilities or systems; major special projects or assigned work when a substantial effort must be expended to meet a compliance date or scheduled deadline. 20()D oore rrse-r 6 Employees in the ,.. ,a{� 'Oiie ve. eifi, itl inlariagemanE Groups volt be eligible to receive adddional compensation �. at one—and times their regular rate of pay for performing the following extraordinary services: work required by a major facilities failure or necessity to protect public health and safety caused by an emergency declared as such by the General Manager or their designee; work which becomes necessary to cover a regularly assigned shift which falls on an otherwise non-work day or shift. Written authorization to receive compensation for all such extraordinary service must be obtained in advance, except in the event such approval is precluded by the nature of the emergency. The authorization must be signed by the General Manager, a Department Head or their designee, and set forth the work to be accomplished, the reason such work is required, the anticipated hours and eligibility for additional compensation. All authorized extraordinary service time worked must be reported on a form designated by the Director of Human Resources as well as the employee's time report. Employees who have received approval for extraordinary service may elect to receive Compensatory Time Off in lieu of additional compensation on an hour-for-hour basis. Normally, employees who accumulate in excess of fifty hours of CTO will be scheduled to take such excess time off at the convenience of the Districts. Except for performing extraordinary services as defined above, Professional, Supervisory-and Executive Management -VlelAteTi1 Group employees are not entitled to receive any compensation or Compensatory Time OH for service rendered beyond their normal work schedule. Vill. SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL PAY Section 15. Employees who are assigned to work an a.m. shift of at least seven consecutive hours, at least four hours of which fall between 0000 hours and 0600 hours, shall receive a shift differential of $1.25 per hour for all such hours actually worked. Similarly, employees who are assigned to work a p.m. shift of at least seven consecutive hours, at least four of which fall between 1800 hours and 2400 hours, shall receive a shift differential of$1.00 per hour for all such hours actually worked. Employees working 12-hour shifts are entitled to $1.50 per hour for the a.m. shift and $1.12 per hour for the p.m. shift effective 11-25-94, and $1.75 per hour for the a.m, shift and $1.25 per hour for the p.m. shift effective 11-24-95. _ IX. STANDBY PAY Section 16. Standby is time during which an employee is not required to be at the work location or at the employee's residence but is required to be available for immediate return to work. Standby assignments shall first be made on a voluntary basis. Except for "E" range employees, an employee placed on standby shall be compensated at the rate of$100 per week, and will receive Call Back Pay when actually called to work. X. CALL BACK PAY Section 17. Except for "E" range employees, when an employee is called back to work by the Districle'without prior notice, and the employee has completed his or her normal work shift and left the plant, or when prior notice is given but the work begins on the same day at least three hours after completion of the regular shift, the employee shall receive a minimum of three hours of rail z000.aoaie 7 m66�.i back pay. The three hours minimum, whether or not actually worked, shall be paid at the rate of one and one half times the regular hourly rate. Employees who are called back a second time within a normal shift period are considered to be working for the duration of that shift. XI. WORKING OUT OF CLASS PAY Section 18, Employees who are temporarily assigned by Districts' management to perform the duties of a higher level class cation for a period of at least 200 hours may be eligible for a one step salary increase, or the first step of the range for the higher level classification, whichever is greater. The higher rate of pay begins with the 201st hour, and continues until the assignment ends. Requests for Working Out of Class pay require the approval of the Department Head and the Director of Human Resources. The 200 hour eligibility period may be waived at the discretion of the General Manager. XII. VACATION Section 19. Except as provided in the Personal Leave Article, regular full-time employees accrue vacation leave, beginning with the first day of employment, in accordance with the following schedule: Years of Service Hours- Biweekly Hours -Annual In Years 0 through 1 3.08 80 In Years 2 through 4 3.08 80 In Years 5 through 10 4.62 120 In Year 11 4.93 128 In Year 12 5.24 136 In Year 13 5.54 144 In Year 14 5.85 152 In Year 15 and over 6.16 160 Vacation leave begins accruing with the first day of employment, but employees are not eligible to schedule vacation time off until the completion of one year's continuous service. Vacation leave may only be utilized in increments of one-half hour or more. Vacation leave is accrued for all paid hours, including hours actually worked and hours in a paid-leave payroll status. Unless special approval is granted in advance for good cause by both the employee's Department Head and the Director of Human Resources, employees may have a maximum accumulation of 200 hours as of the last day of the final pay period in December of each year. In the event an employee accrues vacation leave in excess of 200 hours, it must be used prior to said December date, all other remaining hours in excess of 200 will be paid to the employee in the first pay period in January at the employee's then current hourly rate of compensation. XIII. SICK LEAVE Section 20, Except as provided in the Personal Leave Article, regular full-time employees hired prior to November 27, 1981, accrue paid sick leave at the rate of 3.5 hours for each biweekly pay period of continuous service (91 hours per year) not to exceed 651 hours. Regular full-time employees hired on or after November 17, 1981, accrue paid sick leave at the rate of 3.0 hours for each biweekly pay period of continuous service (78 hours per year) not to exceed 638 hours, beginning with the first day of employment. zoos 19 mes_t 8 Employees may have a maximum accumulation of 651 hours (or 638 hours as provided above) as of the last day of the final pay period in December of each year. in the e�,ent an employee aaGnuos Rink lem-0e P exAAgn nf Fi60 heum, �must be used PROF W sa d DesembeF . All ether remaining hours in excess of 560 will be paid to the employee in the first pay period in January at a rate of 50 percent of the employee's then current hourly rate of compensation. Section 21. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 20 above, employees may elect annually to be paid for any unused sick leave hours accrued through the last day of the last pay period ending in December of each year at their current hourty rate according to the following payoff schedule: Accrued Sick Leave Hours Bate of Payoff 0-100 0% 101-240 25% 241-560 35% Section 22. Employees who terminate for any reason other than retirement or death will be compensated for any accrued and unused sick leave according to the above schedule. Employees (or their estate) who retire for service or disability or die will be paid at the 50 percent rate for all accrued and unused sick leave. XIV. PERSONAL LEAVE Section 23. Personal Leave is accrued in lieu of any vacation or sick leave benefits by regular full- time employees in those job classifications currently represented by the Operations and Maintenance bargaining unit (Exhibit T-fl, as provided in an approved Memorandum of Understanding, or upon expiration thereof, for all paid hours, including hours actually worked and hours in a paid-leave payroll status, on a bi-weekly basis as follows: Personal Leave Hours Years of Service Biweekly Annual 0 through 1 2.31 80' 2 through 4 5.38 140 5 through 10 6.92 180 11 7.23 188 12 7.54 196 13 7.85 204 14 8.15 212 15 and over 8.46 220 Only 60 hours may be taken in the first year, the 20 additional hours will be credited to the accrual balance following successful completion of one year's service. Section 24, Employees may have a maximum accumulation of 400 hours of Personal Leave as of the last day of the final pay period in December of each year. In the event an employee accrues Personal Leave hours in excess of 400, they must be taken as scheduled leave prior to said December date. All other remaining hours in excess of 400 will be paid to the employee in the first pay period of January at the employee's then current hourly rate of compensation. Regular full-time employees (or their estate) who terminate, retire or die will be paid in full at the employee's then current hourly rate of compensation for all Personal leave hours accrued. z000000ts 1 nw-r 9 Section 25. Employees who elected to bank accrued sick leave prior to the implementation of Personal Leave provisions may elect to use such time off for absence due to illness or injury once 40 consecutive hours of Personal Leave have been used. Employees (or their estate)who retire for service or disability or die will be paid at the 50 percent rate for all Banked Sick Leave hours; an employee who terminates will be compensated for Banked Sick Leave as follows: Banked Sick Leave Hours Rate of Pavoff 0- 100 0 percent 101 -240 25 percent 241 -560 35 percent over 560 50 percent Employees may elect to bank the dollar equivalent of up to 400 hours of Personal Leave accrued while in a job classification subject to the Personal Leave provisions of the Operations and Maintenance Memorandum of Understanding upon their promotion or transfer from such classification. Time subsequently withdrawn from the bank will be charged at the employee's hourly rate in effect at the time of the withdrawal. Employees who retire or decease will be paid their Personal Leave Fund balance in full. XV. CONFERRAL OF LEAVE Employees may, on a one-time basis and in accordance with the provisions of the Districts' Policy regarding Conferral of Paid Leave, elect to donate accrued and unused Personnel Leave, Vacation Leave or Compensatory Time Off to an individual employee who has depleted their own paid leave as a direct result of a catastrophic medical condition. All such time must be conferred on a forth provided by the Director of Personnel. XVI. WORKERS COMPENSATION LEAVE Section 26. Employees who are injured in the course of their employment are placed on Workers' Compensation Leave, and receive wage loss benefits to which they are entitled under the Workers' Compensation Act. Employees may request to receive prorated Personal Leave, Sick Leave or Vacation pay to supplement their Workers' Compensation payments in an amount such that the sum of both is equal to the employee's regular base pay. XVIL JURY DUTY Section 27. Employees called for jury duty will be granted a leave of absence with pay for the actual time spent on jury service, less the amount of any jury duty pay received, exclusive of mileage. A copy of the jury notice must be provided to the employee's supervisor and the Human Resource Office. Employees must report for work during their regularly scheduled work shift when they are relieved from jury duty. XVIII. WITNESS LEAVE Section 28. Employees shall be granted leaves of absence to serve as witnesses in accordance with the provisions of California Government Code Sections 1230 and 1230.1. 2000 19 1! 66_1 10 XIX. MILITARY LEAVE OF ABSENCE Section 29, In accordance with the provisions of the Military and Veterans Code, employees who are recalled to active service in the Armed Forces of the United Slates, the National Guard or who are required to fulfill obligations as members of a Military Reserve Unit, will be granted a Military Leave of Absence. While on Military Leave, employees will be paid their regular base pay for up to 30 calendar days. Upon an employee's return to the Districts, all benefit privileges, position, salary and seniority will be restored as if the employee had not been absent in accordance with federal and state law. Employees who participate in weekend military drill duty are not eligible for leave with pay for such activity, but may have their regular work schedule changed to accommodate the required time off based on operational needs of the Districts. XX. LEAVE OF ABSENCE WITHOUT PAY Section 30 Employees may request a Leave of Absence Without Pay for up to one year to pursue a formal course of study or for other acceptable personal reasons. Requests must be submitted in writing, and must specifically state the reason for the request and the dates of anticipated absence. All requests are subject to approval by the employee's Department Head and the Director of Human Resources. Section 31 Employees must provide two weeks notice prior to the date they expect to return from an approved Leave of Absence Without Pay. Employees who do not provide such notice may not be permitted to return to the same position held prior to the leave period. Employees who, without notice or explanation, do not return to work on the date specified at the end of the period will be deemed to have voluntarily terminated. XXI. MEDICAL AND FAMILY LEAVE Section 32. Under the provisions of the federal Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, upon completing one year of employment with the Districts and at least 1250 hours of service, employees are entitled to 12 weeks of unpaid family or medical leave in a 12 month period for three reasons: the birth or adoption of a child;to provide care during a serious health condition of their child, parent or spouse; or because of the employee's own serious health condition. Section 33. In the rase of leaves for foreseeable events such as the expected birth of a child or a planned medical treatment, an employee must provide notice at least 30 calendar days in advance. For unforeseeable events, notice is requested as soon as need for the leave is learned or notice is practicable. Employees are entitled to intermittent leaves not to exceed an aggregate greater than 12 weeks only when such leave is medically necessary to provide care during periods of serious illness of an employee's child, parent or spouse. Employees whose spouse is also employed by the Districts are entitled to an aggregate of 12 weeks' leave during a 12 month period to care for a newly arrived child or sick parent. If the leave is requested because of the illness of a child or of the other spouse, each spouse is entitled to 12 weeks of leave. Section 34, A request for medical leave should be accompanied by certification from the health care provider of the child, parent, spouse or the employee who has a serious health condition indicating: the date the condition began; the probable duration of the condition; appropriate medical facts regarding the condition; a statement that the employee will be unable to perform their regular functions because of the need to provide or receive care; and, in the case of intermittent leave, the dates and duration of the treatments to be given. zaooaooie 11 mes i Section 35, Employees who take Family and Medical Leave are guaranteed reinstatement to the same or to a comparable position at the end of the leave period, and continue to receive the same group health plan coverage and benefits during the leave as if they were continuing to work. Employees may elect, or Districts' management may require, that paid leave including sick, vacation, personal, or accrued compensatory time off be applied towards the unpaid Family and Medical Leave. =I. BEREAVEMENT LEAVE Section 36. An employee who is compelled to be absent from work because of the death or imminent death of either father, mother, grandparent, foster parent, step parent, mother-in-law, father-in-law, brother, sister, wife, husband, child, grandchild or stepchild shall be entitled to a maximum of three working days leave with pay in addition to any other leave benefits provided herein. XXIII. HOLIDAYS Section 37. The days listed below are observed by the Districts as holidays. Regular full-time employees will receive holiday pay if their entire scheduled work shift immediately preceding and following the holiday are in a paid payroll status. When a holiday falls on a regularly scheduled day off for an employee entitled to receive holiday pay the employee shall be entitled to equivalent time off with pay. When an employee's work schedule requires that they work on an observed holiday, the employee will be paid at their regular rate of pay for the holiday, and will also receive overtime pay at the rate of one and one-half times their regular hourly rate for all hours actually worked. Lincoln's Birthday Thanksgiving Day President's Day Day After Thanksgiving Memorial Day Day Before Christmas Independence Day Christmas Labor Day New Years' Day Veteran's Day Floating Holiday XXIV. INSURANCE . Section 38. The Districts shall provide medical-health insurance coverage through both Health Maintenance Organizations and an indemnity plan, which at the Districts' discretion may be self- funded or insured, in accordance with the level of benefits provided in the plans in effect as of the date of adoption of this resolution, together with life insurance, and disability insurance for the benefit of regular full-time employees. All insurance coverage shall become effective on the first day of the month following one full month of employment. An open enrollment period will be held annually in the month of June. 20We0019 11re9_1 12 Section 39. The Districts will contribute up to the following amounts monthly towards the medical health plans: Plan Districts' Contribution NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL LIFE Employee only $338.62 Employee & 1 dependent $477.92 Full Family $653.96 FHP Employee only $134.65 Employee & 1 dependent $215.00 Full Family $275.00 KAISER Employee only $136.62 Employee & 1 dependent $215.00 Full Family $275.00 All costs of group health insurance coverage in excess of the Districts' contribution shall be paid by the employee. Section 40. Any change in insurance rates caused by a carrier after 11-25-94 are subject to the applicable provisions of the various Memoranda of Understanding approved by the Boards of Directors. Section 41. The Districts shall provide and pay the full premium for$50,000 term life insurance on each employee in the Professional, Supervisory) aPA-Executive Management ffl� Groups, and the full premium for$15,000 for all other employees. Section 42, The Districts shall provide a non-work related, short-term disability indemnity plan that pays up to $336 per week for up to 26 weeks following a fourteen calendar day waiting period. Employees may request to receive prorated Sick Leave, Personal Leave or Vacation pay to supplement their short term disability payments in an amount such that the sum of both is equal to the employee's regular base pay. Section 43. At such time that an employee completes five years of service, the Districts shall provide a non-work related, long-term disability indemnity plan that pays two-thirds of the employee's rate of pay in effect at the time of such disability, not to exceed $5,000 per month, for up to two years, following a 90-day waiting period of continuous disability. No combination of disability and sick, personal or vacation leave pay shall result in more than an employee's regular rate of pay. Employees may not receive short-term and long-term disability benefits at the same time. An employee who is otherwise not eligible for Districts' paid Long Tern Disability may purchase such coverage at their own expense. Section 44. The Districts shall provide dental insurance coverage. Employees shall contribute the following monthly costs for the Districts' Self-Funded Dental Plan: $0.00 for employee only coverage; and, $9.00 for full family coverage. Section 45. The Districts will pay, for employees hired prior to July 1, 1988, two and one-half months' premium for each year of continuous service of an employee retiring for service, work or 3o60.66a19 17766_1 13 non-work related disability towards the premium costs of coverage for the employee and eligible dependents under a Districts' medical plan. Section 46 The Districts reserve the right to unilaterally change plan providers. In the event the Districts add additional optional insurance plans, the Districts' share of the premium will be the same as for existing plans as set forth in Section 39 above. In the event the Districts change underwriters for existing insurance plans, the Districts' share of the premium will be the same as for existing insurance plans as set forth in Section 39 above. Section 47. The Districts shall ft enter6d into an agreement with the Orange County Employee Retirement System (OCERS) to implement the retiree medical health premium offset program established by the County of Orange wherein the cost of health premiums are offset by $10 per month for every year of service up to a maximum of 25 years or $250 per month. Upon the effective date of the agreement, each employee will pay one percent of his or her salary to OCERS to fund the above program. Section 48. Employees who have payroll deductions for medical and dental health insurance premiums shall be entitled to request that their salary be reduced by the amount of those deductions pursuant to Internal Revenue Code regulations. The amount deducted shall then be repaid to the employee through the Districts' Reimbursement Program. Participation in this program does not affect the Districts' contribution to the Orange County Employees Retirement System. XXV. DEFERRED COMPENSATION Section 49, Employees may participate in the Districts' deferred compensation plan, approved separately by the Boards of Directors, and amended from time to time, subject to all requirements for participation established by Districts' management. The minimum deposit per pay period is $25, and the total annual maximum deposit is $7,500 or 25 percent of gross salary, whichever is less, in accordance with IRS regulations and the Districts' plan. Section 50: The Districts will contribute towards an employee's Deferred Compensation Account as specifically provided in District Boards Joint Resolution No. 9 1574414, which is summarized as follows: Districts' Contribution Classification Level Matching Non-Matching Gen. Mgr. and Asst. Gen. Mgr. -0. $7500 Department Head 3.0% 3.0% Asst. opartmo,Yead 2.09; 2 S% Executive-Management;-and 1.0% 2.0% Professional and Supervisory XXVI. BENEFITS OPTION PLANS Section 51. Employees in the Professional, Supervisory and-Executive Management Matlag"e`r*e Groups who have successfully completed their Probationary Period are entitled to participate in the Benefits Option Plan. Under the provisions of the Plan, Professional employees will be reimbursed for up to $500 annually, Supervisory employees up to $1000 annually and Executive Management q iA,,,.f1, pr,.. M employees up to $1250 annually in 2000.00019 1"W_1 14 the . N _rAy, 'AL Section Section 52. Professional Group employees are also entitled to tuition reimbursement of up to $250 annually for job related Courses taken to meet changing job demands and to prepare for advarjcement within the Districts. Section $3, The Benefits Option Plan will be administered on a calendar year basis, and employees must designate expenditures by December 1 each year for the following year. Designations may not be modified during the year. Requests for reimbursement of expenses must be submitted on the appropriate Districts' form. Plan funds that are designated to offset insurance premium expenses may be paid directly to the appropriate plan provider on a monthly or pay period basis at the Districts' discretion. Section 54. Any funds that are not Claimed in accordance with provisions of the Benefits Option Plan will be payable directly to the employee or credited to the employee's Defamed Compensation Account. XXVII. EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT VEHICLE ALLOWANCE Section 55. In lieu of a leased vehicle for use in the performance of their duties, AssislaAiDepartment Heads and above shall be eligible, at the discretion of the General Manager, to receive a monthly vehiole allowance in an amount equal to $715 if hired prior to August 24, 1993, and $465 per month if hired after that date, except as otherwise authorized by the Boards, and as amended from time to time. Each employee receiving the vehicle allowance shall furnish at their cost all transportation needs in the performance of their duties within the Counties of Orange, Los Angeles, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Diego, Santa Barbara, Kam and Ventura. Such employees shall also furnish at least the following amounts of insurance coverage: Bodily Injury $250,000 each person; each occurrence $500,000; property damage $250.000. Employees receiving this allowance are prohibited from circumventing the intent and purpose of the allowance by obtaining the regular use of a District-owned vehicle in the performance of their duties. XXVIII. UNIFORMS Section 56. The Districts shall provide ten uniform pants and shirts, or three lab coats, bi- weekly)at no cost for employees whose duties require that they wear uniforms. Coveralls shall also be available as required. Section . All employees who are issued uniforms must wear them during the performance of their regular duties. Other clothing appropriate to the occasion, as determined by Districts' management, may be wom when attending business meetings. Failure to wear required clothing, shoes and safety equipment may be cause for disciplinary action. XXIX. RETIREMENT Section 58. The Districts and its employees shall participate in the Orange County Employees Retirement System, wherein all eligible employees are considered members. The retirement program in effect pursuant to the contract between OCERS and the Districts as of December 2, tz�aaote 15 1977, shall continue in effect unless amendments to contracts or termination of membership is effected by the Districts subsequent to meeting and conferring with recognized employee units conceming such proposed amendments or termination, Section 59. The Districts shall pay 4.5% of an eligible employee's base salary towards the employee's required contribution to the Orange County Employees Retirement System in addition to the Districts' payment of the employers required contribution. All monies actually contributed into the retirement system by an employee will be deducted from gross salary for taxation purposes in accordance with Internal Revenue Code provisions. XXX. SEVERANCE PAY Section 60. Employees are required to give a minimum of two weeks written notification when terminating employment with the Districts. When a full-lime regular employee is terminated by action of the Districts, except for dissipkaagcause, the employee will be notified in writing two weeks prior to the effective separation date. In the event such notification is not given, the employee shall be entitled to severance pay in accordance with the formula set forth below: a. Full-time regular employees shall be entitled to six hours pay for each full calendar month of continuous employment not to exceed eighty hours pay, or as may be determined by the General Manager. b. Employees in temporary or part-time classifications, and employees who are separated for muse, are not eligible for severance pay under any circumstances. XXXI. WORKING HOURS Section 61 The mission of the Districts requires that operations and maintenance activities be carried out on a continuous basis. Administrative and business functions are normally performed between the hours of 7:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. Monday through Thursday, and until 4:30 p.m. on Friday. Activities and services that involve contact with the public or outside organizations will be performed during those hours. In addition, individual divisions may schedule work beyond those hours, subject to approval by the Department Head to meet specific operating or service requirements in the most cost effective or gfficienl manner. Section 62. For time record keeping and accounting purposes, the work schedule for full-lime employees is established as forty hours per week based on a bi-weekly payroll period of eighty hours. The actual work periods may be scheduled in shifts of five eight hour days each week (10180 schedule), four nine hour days each week and one addition eight hour shift on alternate weeks (9/80 schedule) or four ten hour days each week (8/80 schedule). Operations employees may work three twelve hour shifts each week and one additional eight hour shift on alternate weeks (7/80 schedule). Day shifts typically begin between 6:30 and 7:30 a.m. However, actual starting and ending times may vary depending on operational requirements of each department. Work hours may also be varied, subject to minimum staffing requirements, to allow for individual circumstances such as ridesharing. XXXII. LAYOFF PROCEDURE Section 63. If, in the sole discretion of Districts' management, Human Resource reductions are necessary, layoff order and recall lists will be developed based upon job classification, priority of ]000-00019 17s _1 16 function, individual qualifications and seniority within the job classification. Employees subject to layoff will be provided with notification in accordance with the provisions of the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act. Section 64, Employees in classifications subject to layoff may request a voluntary demotion to any previously held position for which they remain qualified. Such request must be made in writing to the Human Resource Department within five days of receipt of the Layoff Notice. The salary of an employee who voluntarily demotes will be unchanged, except that it may not exceed the lop step of the range for the lower level classification. Section 65. Recall lists will be developed for all classifications experiencing personnel reductions, and will be maintained for a period of two years from the date of the layoff. Individuals will be placed on the list in the inverse order of layoff, so that the last person laid off is the first recalled. When a vacancy occurs in a classification for which a Recall List exists, an offer of reemployment will be made to the individual on the top of the list. That individual must respond to the offer within five days, or the offer will be made to the next person on the list. An individual who either does not respond or refuses three consecutive offers will have their name removed from the list. XXXIII. DISCIPLINE Section 66. The General Manager is authorized and directed to exercise supervision over all employees and to impose disci Rag1-aefieasaj',' 1,, forjust cause, upon any person employed under the provisions of this Resolution. he General Manager shall establish rules and guidelines pertaining to the procedures governing such actions. The General Manager is authorized to delegate his authority herein to Department Heads, Division Managers, Director of Human Resources and other management and supervisory employees as the General Manager deems aPProPriate. na IM. ��fl'. . tnWA Section 67, Discipline occurs when any of the following pregressiveactions are taken forjust cause with respect to any employee: oral reprimand, counseling memo, written warning, suspension with or without pay, deferral or denial of a merit increase, reduction in pay, demotion to a classification with a lower top step of pay, or dismissal. Dismissal is the separation from Districts employment of a non-probationary employee initiated by the Districts for proper cause. Section 68. A Notice of Intent b1lL, ,.„ q , is not required when the disciplinary action involves an oral reprimand, counseling memo, written warning or suspension for five or fewer working days (with or without pay) or deferral or denial of a merit increase. Section 69. A Notice of Intent C r" ffi#IW 6 tM is required and will be given to an employee whenever the disciplinary action involves suspension for more than five working days, reduction in pay, demotion to a classification with a lower top step of pay or dismissal. The aeliee-�, .tl(vilt shall be given to the affected employee either by delivery in person or by Certified Mail sent to the employee's last known address. The Notice of Intent shall indicate the date on which it was personally delivered or deposited in the mail, which shall be the date of issuance. The Notice of Intent shall contain a description of the disciplinary action intended, the effective date of the action, the reasons for the proposed action, and a copy of the charges and materials upon which the action is based. The Notice shall also provide a statement of the employee's right to respond, either orally or in writing to the authority initially imposing the discipline, the 2000.OMIO 17 nrss t person to whom any response must be directed, and the fact that such response must be received within ten business days of the date of issuance of the notice. The Notice will also advise the employee of their right to representation. Section 70. Prior to the effective date of the proposed disciplinary action {"'uTflrJgµ , oic the employee will be given an opportunity to respond either orally or in writing to a management representative with authority to make an effective recommendation on the proposed action. After review of an employee's response, the Districts will notify the employee in writing of any action to be taken. Such action may not involve discipline more severe than that described in the Notice of Intent; however, the Districts may reduce discipline without further notice. Section 71. Dismissal shall be preceded by at least one written warning, except in those situations in which the employee knows or reasonably should have known that the performance or conduct was unsatisfactory. Such performance or conduct may involve, but is not limited to: dishonesty, possession, use, sale or being under the influence of drugs or alcohol, theft or misappropriation of Districts' property, falsification of time records, fighting on the job, insubordination, acts endangering people or property, or other serious misconduct. The Districts may substitute documented suspensions with or without pay for written warnings. Section 72. If a Notice of Intent is upheld and the disciplinary action is imposed, the employee may request a post disciplinary hearing. The request must be submitted to the Director of Human Resources within ten business days following the effective date of the disciplinary action (for suspensions, the effective date shall be the first business day of the suspension). The Director of Human Resources shall schedule a post disciplinary hearing with the General Manager or his designee. The General Manager, or his designee, may uphold the disciplinary action which has been taken or may reduce such discipline without the issuance of further notice. The decision of the General Manager or his designee shall be final. Section 73. The Districts may place an employee on investigatory leave without prior notice in order to review or investigate allegations of conduct which, in the Districts' view, would warrant relieving the employee immediately from all work duties. If, upon conclusion of the investigation, neither suspension without pay nor dismissal is determined by the Districts to be appropriate, the employee shall be paid for the leave. Although an investigatory leave may exceed fifteen business days, if a suspension without pay is determined to be the appropriate discipline, a maximum of fifteen business days of the investigatory leave period may be applied to such suspension without pay. If dismissal is determined by the Districts to be appropriate, the entire investigatory leave period shall be without pay. Section 74. Disciplinary action documentation shall be placed in the employee's Personnel File in the Human Resource Office. Counseling memos and warning letters may be removed from that file twenty four months subsequent to the date of the memo or letter, provided there has been no reoccurrence of a similar nature during the period. XXXIV. GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE Section 75. A grievance is any charge that management has violated a specific provision of a Memorandum of UnderstandingeFef this-reaelnfiera Discipline imposed enderunder Article XXXU it is not reviewable as a grievance under this procedure. Section 76. A grievance may be brought to the attention of the Districts by an individual employee or by a recognized employee organization. A grievance may not be brought by the 209600019 17766_1 18 Districts through this procedure. Grievances brought by two or more employees, and conceming the same incident, issue, or course of conduct, or multiple grievances brought by the same employee may, upon mutual agreement of the Districts and an employee organization, be consolidated for the purposes of this procedure. An employee shall have the right to be represented at all steps of the Grievance Procedure by any other employee within the bargaining group or representative of the recognized employee organization. Any reference to days in this article implies business days. Step 1. An employee who has a complaint shall attempt to resolve it with their immediate supervisor within five days of the occurrence of the event giving rise to the complaint. The supervisor shall attempt to resolve the issues surrounding the complaint, and respond to the employee within five days. Step 2. If the grievance is not settled informally at Step 1, it may be presented in writing to the employee's Department Head or designee. This request for formal review must be presented on a form provided by the Districts within five days of the conclusion of Step 1. The written grievance must: a. Identify the specific management act to be reviewed; b. Specify how the employee was adversely affected; C. List the specific provisions of the MOU that were allegedly violated, and state how they were violated; d. Provide the date of attempts at informal resolution and the name of the supervisor or individual involved. The Department Head or his or her designee shall respond in writing to the employee within ten days after the date the grievance is received. Step 3. If a grievance is not settled under Step 1 or 2, it may be presented to the Director of Human Resources for review and written response. The request for formal review must be presented on a form provided by the Districts within ten days of the conclusion of Step 1 or 2, and must contain the information specified in Step 2 above. The Director of Human Resources, or designee, shall respond in writing to the employee Within ten days after the date the grievance is received. Step 4. If the grievance cannot be resolved under Step 3, it may be presented to the General Manager within ten days from the date the Step 3 finding was issued. The General Manager, or designee, shall respond in writing to the employee within fifteen days after the date the grievance is received. The action of the General Marit ge"r is deemed final. Section 77. General Provisions. An employee shall be given reasonable time off, with advance approval of his or her supervisor, to investigate and process a grievance. When an employee is represented by a recognized employee organization, that organization may designate one employee to investigate and process the grievance. The employee representative shall be given reasonable time off, with the advance approval of his or her supervisor, to perform this duty. Time off for investigating and processing a grievance shall be without loss of pay. Absence from work will be approved only if it does not disrupt the Districts'operations. If the time requested cannot be provided, another time will be aranged. Failure of a supervisor, Department Head or other management representative to respond within the prescribed time limit shall provide a basis for the employee to appeal to the next step. If a grievance is not presented or appealed within the time limits, it shall be considered settled xa00000ie 19 on the basis of the preceding response. The Director of Human Resources may be petitioned in writing to waive the step or time requirements provided sufficient cause exists. Time limits may also be extended at any step upon mutual agreement of the parties. XXXV. PROBLEM SOLVING PROCEDURE Section 78. Employees may bring problems to the attention of Districts' managers through the Problem Solving Procedure. This procedure was developed to encourage and facilitate the resolution of employee concems in a responsive and fair manner, and may be used to attempt to resolve issues which may not be subjected to the Grievance Procedure. Employees should discuss concerns regarding issues which are not grievable with their supervisor as soon as possible. The supervisor will review the situation or decision, and provide a written response within five days of the date they were notified of the problem. If the problem is not resolved to the employee's satisfaction, they may file a written statement concerning the problem with the Director of Human Resources within ten days of receipt of the supervisor's decision. Upon request of either party, a meeting will be held to define issues and establish the remedies sought. The employee will be provided a written response within ten days after their statement is received. Time limits may be extended for cause upon mutual consent of the parties, and the decision of the Director of Human Resources is final. XXXVI. ATTENDANCE Section 79. Prompt and regular attendance is required in order to maintain effective and efficient Districts' operations. For that reason, all employees are expected to report to work as scheduled unless proper arrangements have been made for authorized absence. Section 80 Supervisors are responsible for ensuring that employees observe the Districts' need for prompt and regular attendance. They are also responsible for providing counseling at each step of this procedure, including referring employees to the Human Resource Department or Employee Assistance Program for help in dealing with medical, physical, or personal difficulties related to their attendance problem. All of the facts and circumstances surrounding an employee's inability to report for work should be considered in the counseling process, including the employee's performance, overall attendance, reasons for missing work and prospects for improvement. While the Districts' need for prompt and regular attendance of all employees is of utmost importance, it is equally important to recognize individual employee needs in a fair and impartial manner. Section 8l. Employees must notify their supervisor of their inability to report for work as scheduled as far in advance as possible, and in no case later than the regular start time. Employees will be considered late, charged with a partial absence, and have their pay adjusted accordingly if they arrive for work more than fifteen minutes after their start time unless other arrangements are made. Tardiness is not acceptable from a performance standpoint, and should be addressed through a program of progressive discipline. Section 82. Employees may also be charged with a partial absence, and have their pay adjusted accordingly, if they leave work early. The notification of absence should include a reasonable explanation and an estimate of when the employee expects to be able to return. The Districts may require medical documentation of any absence due to illness or injury, particularly when there is an indication that abuse of time off privileges may exist. ?000.00019 trw 1 20 Section 83, An absence will be recorded for all unscheduled Personal Leave time off or sick leave use. However, absences of more than one consecutive day for the same injury or illness will be treated as a single occurrence. Once an employee has accumulated five separate unscheduled absence occurrences within a calendar year, which may involve more than five days due to absences of more than one days duration, their supervisor will meet with them to discuss the reasons for the absences and the Districts' need for regular attendance. The accumulation of seven occurrences of absence within a twelve month period will result in a verbal warning. The eighth occurrence will result in a written warning. Employees who are charged with ten occurrences of absence within the twelve month period will be subject to termination. Section 84. Employees who have perfect attendance for a period of two consecutive months may have one absence occurrence removed from their accumulation record for counseling purposes only. Up to three occurrences may be removed in this manner for a total of six months of perfect attendance. XXXVII. MEDICAL EXAMINATION Section 85, All offers of employment are contingent upon successful completion of a pre- employment physical examination, including a drug screening test. Offers of employment will not be extended to individuals who fail to pass the drug screen test. However, such individuals may be considered for other employment opportunities after a six month period has elapsed. Examinations are provided by the Districts at no cost to the applicant. Section 86. When there is reasonable evidence to suggest that an employee is impaired in a manner which endangers his or her own health or safety, or that of others, the Districts may require that employee to be examined or evaluated by a health care provider. The purpose of such examination must be job related. Any examination under this provision will be conducted on Districts' time and at Districts' expense. An employee may submit an independent medical opinion regarding his or her condition and addressing his or her ability to competently perform the duties of their position. This information will be reviewed and considered by a competent medical authority in arriving at a decision regarding the individual's continued employment in the position. XXXVIII. LIGHT DUTY Section 87. An employee who is released by a physician to perform limited duties because of a temporary disability may be assigned to light duty at the discretion of the Districts. Light duty may consist of duties other than those normally performed by the employee. An employee assigned to light duty shall be paid the regular wage rate for the job classification held prior to being temporarily disabled. XXXIX. SUBSTANCE ABUSE Section 88, The mission of the Districts, and its concern for the safety and well-being of employees and the public, provide for a strong commitment to maintaining a drug and alcohol free workplace. In support of that commitment, the Districts will not tolerate the unlawful or unauthorized manufacture, sale, possession, distribution, use or being under the influence of a controlled substance or alcohol while on the job or on Districts' property. m000mrs 21 mss r Section 89. Any employee who is reasonably suspected of controlled substance or alcohol use _ which adversely impacts their job performance or behavior, or who manufactures, possesses, consumes, sells, or distributes controlled substances or alcohol on Districts' property or while on Districts' business, will be required to undergo testing for controlled substance or alcohol use. Reasonable suspicion of the use of or being under the influence of a controlled substance or alcohol may be based on appropriate factors, including excessive absenteeism or attendance problems, poor work performance or erratic behavior coupled with one or more of the following signs: bloodshot or water eyes; very large or very small pupils, runny nose, excessive perspiration, nausea and vomiting, lack of coordination, slurred speech, or unpredictable responses to ordinary requests. Section 90, Employees found to be under the influence of controlled substances or alcohol while on Districts' property or on Districts' business, or who otherwise violate the Districts' Substance Abuse Policy,will be placed on a Leave of Absence and referred to the Employee Assistance Program for evaluation. Return to work will be contingent upon successful completion of a rehabilitation program and a thorough assessment of the particular circumstances concerning the abuse. An employee who chooses not to participate in the rehabilitation program, or in the drug and alcohol screening test, or who tampers with the test specimen, will be subject to disciplinary action including, but not limited to, termination. Any employee who successfully completes a rehabilitation program and is subsequently found to be in violation of the Substance Abuse Policy, will be terminated from employment with the Districts without further rehabilitative effort. Section 91, Controlled substances are those substances defined as such in the Federal Controlled Substance Act or the California Health and Safety Code. All testing procedures will be in conformance with National Institute on Drug Abuse standards, and will be conducted at a reasonable time at the Districts' expense. Section 92, If a Districts' manager or supervisor has a reasonable suspicion that an employee is under the influence of a controlled substance or alcohol while on Districts' business or on Districts' property, or otherwise in violation of the Districts' Substance Abuse Policy, they must refer that employee to the Human Resource Department for a drug and alcohol screening test. If an employee suspects that another employee is under the influence of a controlled substance or alcohol in such a manner as to offer concern for the safety and well-being of other employees or the public, or is otherwise in violation of this policy, that employee has an obligation to immediately bring the matter to the attention of a Districts' manager or supervisor. XL. RIDESHARE PROGRAM Section 93, The South Coast Air Quality Management District's Regulation XV requires that the Districts offer incentives to reduce commute trips and meet ridesharing goals. In conformance with those regulations, The Boards have, by separate action, as amended from time to time, adopted the following incentives to encourage employees to rideshare: 4- ,Compressed bi-weekly work schedules. (lowing flexibility in the establishment of work hours to facilitate vanpool and other Ridesharing participation. -- Designation of preferential parking spaces for Rideshare vehicles. z0000019 Irani 22 44MOperation of a Vanpool Program offering Districts' provided vans with the following provisions: The cost of operating the van would be recovered from the participating employees, with the driver paying a reduced amount; The Districts would subsidize up to three empty seats for up to three months when employee participation turnover occurs to keep the fares consistent and to give participants time to recruit new riders; Prospective new participants will receive one free month as an encouragement for trying vanpooling (to be subsidized by the Districts); All participants will be required to sign a Vanpooling Agreement approved by the General Counsel setting forth the conditions of vanpool participation. &WRProvision of a computerized carpool ridership matching service and routing assistance. Utilization of certain fleet vehicles currently authorized to be driven between home and work by employees subject to emergency call-out for ridesharing purposes, as practical. TWEGuaranteed Ride Home Program utilizing certain fleet vehicles in the event a Rideshare participant cannot return home at the normally scheduled departure of their carpool or vanpool. OfMinstallation and maintenance of bike racks at each plant as well as locker room and shower facilities. KM aConversion of in-plant vehicles used in Operations and Maintenance activities to electric power as appropriate. Conversion of fleet vehicles to alternate clean fuel systems as appropriate. Providing additional paid time off: employees Ridesharing at least 60 percent of the time during a calendar quarter would accrue 4.5 hours of paid time off for that quarter, to be taken off in the same calendar year, employees Rideshanng at least 90 percent of the time would accrue 6.75 hours per calendar quarter. 42:I' 4A Packing Fee Program will be implemented only if Districts employees are unsuccessful in meet SCAQMD mandated Average Vehicle Ridership goals by July 1, 1991, or in any subsequent quarterly period if such goal is not met. Once the Parking Fee Program is implemented for failure to meet the SCAQMD mandated Average Vehicle Ridership goal, it shall thereafter remain in effect. If the Parking Fee Program is implemented, employees hired subsequent to July 1, 1991, will be subject to a $30 per month parking fee; employees hired on or prior to that date will be subject to a monthly parking fee of$15 beginning July 1 of the initial year of implementation, and increasing to $30 July 1 of the second year of implementation. To enhance the potential of meeting the SCAQMD requirements, the Districts will make a reasonable effort to provide an incentive program that encourages employees to commute by means other than single occupancy vehicles. z000mors tress 1 23 XLI. NONDISCRIMINATION IN EMPLOYMENT Section 94. The Districts are an Equal Opportunity Employer, and do not discriminate against any person in matters of employment, application for employment, participation in programs and benefits, or in the application of rules and regulations with regard to race, ancestry, color, religion, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, age, veteran status, marital status or mental or physical disability or citizenship. XLII. SEXUAL HARASSMENT Section 96 The Districts will not tolerate sexual harassment in the workplace. Sexual Harassment may include, but is not limited to, any of the following: 1. Sexual favors. Unwanted sexual advances which condition an employment benefit upon exchange of sexual favors. 2. Hostile work environment. Sexually-based verbal, physical or visual harassment of such a nature and intensity that it creates an intimidating, hostile or offensive working environment. Conduct that may result in a hostile work environment includes, but is not limited to, the following: a. Sexual epithets,jokes, derogatory comments or slurs; b. Assault, impeding or blocking movement, or any physical interference with normal work or movement when directed at an individual on the basis of sex; C. Sexual cartoons, drawings, photographs or derogatory posters. Any employee who believes that he or she has been the victim of sexual harassment should immediately report the matter to his or her supervisor or manager, or to any other supervisor or manager, including the General Manager. Complaints of sexual harassment will be promptly investigated, and appropriate corrective action will be taken. Section 96, The Districts will not tolerate any other forth of harassment, and is committed to providing a work environment that is free from unlawful discrimination. to keeping with that commitment, the Districts maintains a strict policy prohibiting harassment based on race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical or mental disability, medical condition, marital status, sex, age, sexual orientation, exercise of rights relating to family care leave, or any other legally protected basis. This policy prohibits unlawful harassment will be promptly investigated, and appropriate corrective action will be taken. XLIII. SMOKE-FREE ENVIRONMENT Section 97. The Districts endorse and support the right of all employees to work in a healthy and safe environment free of recognized hazards. In view of the hazards associated with smoking, and the potentially harmful effect it has on the health and well being of Districts' employees and their families, smoking is not permitted within Districts' facilities. 20WOW19 In66_1 24 a F iRF S 3, 4n' yt a '^5 kA 1 'Sn R s o tl"t an@,p13�RU.lt}, Ant9f to aD@ O;litd-$ }31ce6 ved{t p�a�slp „2.ieser�Gedby:�t��ra}�.,f{3ort7 .. p1o�' pirf�ment�sfeA�.��! sjs Id3p Pb�a W�flca4o�}' &�rt{p �flab clotplw" y Ailp� ae payah�e C0 ¢ 5 ff9,8Ver�>343 SQ � ��f >t�tFa aa�rsY'2'''��1ft1���t{a Ja cA(rf aoer�mpfton,Fr�a tRa'nJ�•s C Oe at�nLv,��alryne a��OT1t'�e.Ai�:o'r��o`„i t$�ih4�o!��Y>c�iapiaa1o"ft�b}rK�n+n s-aans7t v,io({ti,�tr6�,i�fa3�Br�INauI�oGfu}i i'b�ur0�s11?"cndRa 1asA}gsR fa44�A1?A€k$n 'f�uf�f{�`�ja�fSlhe,,S65e36.t,�t�r�.ry'flha;E�,�re'4f ",��,��h$::"�rOe�!er�'�tP. g"h':r�g lfie��Or�'1p w#� � ss�o`"��'m 's� slhere(S{rtt9�ta��1l�sovrr�'7���iaYi.16'e tnetp `y[y�� I re$t.tna"� met�a y�apawr�titte¢,tf '`�dA ".4 aiith` aa�t"' tQ;, asr�{�ie t"irrnef a Rire�a'"a°�itdlv,�,oip��Y�t �rt[Ns�`�:: '��t�y. tt+r'a�+ nRda' .Rn ar��aG�a�ri�jam Rom" �Fv1l� at24L�,f m r�� 3"rp e de'raStgrr�7n tiding Y halt I1Lr}t�q:t�4�}{a �,�" �1�dhtraR}r�patiarjcR�f�a�� � ptdmtsa of atlt�ftC�' m`71.jsenal6ear-for�,��C��za odd{Q���.:Sa�rSiass a�I 4�f�b,�, a�g@ aOtY�'��`i��l�" h`eltwtesan�,p[oC�tlures,%R�a ,,, saeateattAl�'apro�R�tvi�irrei�; diaR 91�,, ote �t � yais„�• �;@>1�'�e�rtpr�°iiK�,s�k�a.�e: D1stNd15' 1s1�6 cftp �ar�'iar'�Cm�tYta{®su'.�,wfi}i shell t5e'p�4A ftlBF anychang�',I�isa,,t{,r��n, _ .te���ryer'�pgippt�ardv�ille, eror�isc�s��r6 ;1110161 1esb �e6Rfreoai fi�rs, nebas�s„ t.a p red�ot�?A�F��ast,�,tet9sts,�at�e�str3c�s;,t�da�o XLV. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS Section r,,,,86 't" The General Manager is authorized to develop and administer written Human Resource pdiidias and procedures in order to augment, clarify or otherwise provide for the proper implementation of the provisions of this resolution, and to authorize special adjustments to avoid or eliminate inconsistencies which may result from a strict application or the provisions of this resolution. z000mole 25 maa_+ P1f6a1 A�le0ti" , Pfmna —we C Sedioln 88 Resolution Numbers � .-7�z i and any other resolutions, minute Mrs;' or portions thereof "t Cdf s$piF %W-R a, that are in conflict herewith are hereby rescinded and made of no further effect on the effective date hereof. PASSkD AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Boards of Directors held this_ day of yea_ 25 I i i I I I i i i i i It I Mini. A 0.ed. B.." Ontu 30 A00 LOSS Min 1 5 1 0 3 5 A Mid 3 9 4 0 4 S Mn ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ .......... 1000 7.1603 6.0031 0.3400 8.4769 8.113E 0.9507 SAM 9.434S SASH 3001 1L.2313 11.5634 12.9174 12.3135 13.4118 12.1124 13.3076 13.9131 13.9991 1003 12.5454 11.9591 43.3139 13.6964 14.0001 14.4638 14.8475 1S.3311 15.614E 1003 13.5231 13,9385 14.3132 14.7676 19.1833 15.5968 16.0114 16.4259 16.0409 1004 13.6166 14.03$0 L4.4l09 14.0601 15.2652 LO.7034 16.1195 16.5167 16.1538 LOOS 13.9090 14.3312 14.7973 19.1815 19.6091 16.033$ 19.4620 19.4881 L9.3141 i0O6 14.1934 14.6313 15.0612 15.4952 15.9290 10.3629 16.7167 17.2306 17.9645 1007 14.2091 14.1339 15.1616 15.5994 16.0371 16.4749 16.9136 17.3504 17.7881 LOOS 14.681E 15.1371 18.SB65 16.0358 16.4850 16.934E 11.3B38 11.8333 18.383S 1001 12.7590 14.2418 16.1346 17.2074 17.4903 LOAM 10.65S9 19.1381 19.631E 1010 1S.6630 14.3491 11.1354 L9.3330 17.9087 31.3054 18.7921 19.2607 19.1S54 3011 11.1919 11.6873 11.1B30 P1.6161 iSA744 18.6700 19.1651 19.4614 20.157% 1011 L6.6310 11.1405 11.6501 18.1S96 14.6913 19.1127 11.603 20.1178 20.7073 1013 16.4181 16.9203 17.4338 17.1246 19.4267 19.9388 11.4310 19.5331 20.4332 1014 16.9841 17.5061 18.0316 SB.5490 19.0705 19.5111 20.1123 20.6340 21.1562 1015 17.3412 11.4151 10.404% 19.9366 11.4570 11.1975 30.5319 21.0564 21.5988 1016 11.10/1 10.3417 10.7008 19.311E 19.0739 30.41S9 20.9579 21.3000 13.0420 L017 17.0110 18.3449 19.9108 19.4567 20.0029 20.5485 11.0944 21.6402 11.1862 1018 18.5701 11.1400 11.7091 20.3161 20.0411 21.4163 31.1054 33.5944 31.1139 1011 11.0099 11.6704 20.2550 10.6395 21.4240 22.00BS 13.5131 23.1116 23.7421 1030 11.1676 30.0837 20.6790 31.3159 21.0131 13.4442 23.0143 23.6604 24.3545 1031 19.61LS 10.211S 30.8215 21.4214 33.0214 33.6324 23.3314 23.8213 34.4313 L033 10.1311 10.11S1 21.3131 33.0111 23.6291 23.2471 23.6951 24.4031 25.1011 1033 20.3013 20.1232 21.5450 33.1661 33.7084 23.4104 24.0325 34.9S43 35.3142 1034 20.1336 11.3983 21.1931 13.6310 13.2636 33.B173 24.5320 25.1668 35.SOSS 1035 31.1004 31.9S31 33.6059 23.2587 23.9113 24.5442 35.1110 26.4697 26.5335 1016 31.3510 33.0360 23.1309 24.4051 25.0100 35.11SB 21.4607 31.14S7 31.0309 1011 19.1194 16.7333 19.3010 19.6454 20.4031 30.9195 21.5163 33.073% 33.6391 3000 9.1147 10.0141 10.3141 10.6747 10.9747 11.3146 11.S146 11.9746 12.1749 1001 10.3309 10.6463 10.9618 11.1171 11.5111 11.9081 12.3335. 13.5390 13.0344 3003 12.5199 11.9019 MUSS 13.161B 14.136E 14.S311 14.1067 15.2116 15.4710 1003 13.1611 13.1$31 13.5445 13.9359 14.3113 14.7117 15,1101 15.5015 15.8929 3004 13.2149 13.6191 14.0335 14.4311 14.8320 15.3363 13.1406 19.0449 16.4491 1005 13.3900 13.8001 14.2114 14.6131 13.0329 15.4434 15.9543 16.3650 16.6757 3006 14.3479 14.7149 19.3360 15.6650 L6.1041 16.5431 16.002L 11.41L1 L1.0603 3007 14.7313 15,1912 15.1431 16.0150 14.1400 11.9981 17.4501 11.1011 11.3S46 3000 16.1119 16.6116 11.1051 17.5004 18.0920 10.5051 19.0712 11.3713 20.0944 1009 16.3335 16.7115 17.2115 11.1134 18.2104 18.7074 19.2044 19.7013 20.1183 1010 16.6757 17.1668 17.4990 19.3001 18.7303 11.2314 19.7425 20.2937 10.7649 3011 11.7910 L1.3040 11.OLOO 12.3140 18.6490 10.3640 11.8110 20.3140 30.9010 3011 11.9602 18.4071 15.5546 11.5018 20.0490 20,5061 21.1433 21.6905 33.2311 30LI 10.4762 19.0447 10.9112 20.1111 20.7442 21.3107 21.9113 31.4437 13.0 L01 3014 19.1311 19.1139 20.3981 10.0945 21.4704 13.0592 32.6420 13.3310 33.0136 2015 20.1183 SCAM 21.4369 13.0562 33.61SS 23.2147 23.1140 24.3333 23.1916 BNielr A Series s Salary Rep9ee 8isral Year 1995 - 1996 Range 05cR No. Min nid eereancile Max ..... ........ .. ..... .......... .......... 8 1 .1.3010 i9.e021 21.S1NS 23.2243 S 2 17.3321 20.79e0 22.5607 24.3634 8 3 1a.0606 31.0231 23.7024 25.5016 8 < 10.9e56 22.1371 24.9131 26.8999 8 5 11.1314 24.0164 26.D3 28.1113 8 6 20.1118 23.25<7 27.4237 29.9921 8 7 21.981S 21.5473 28.8276 31.1080 8 0 23.OS61 27.8317 30.2314 32.1232 B 9 24.2446 21.2607 31.1900 34.3268 8 10 25.4033 30.6920 33.3363 35.1806 R 11 21.7101 32.2519 35.0225 37.9911 0 12 26.0774 33.1909 36,812. 31.72e3 S 13 29.4738 35.5795 38.6324 41.6852 8 16 30.1000 37.3177 00.526S 43.1153 B 15 32.4747 39.2060 42.5692 45.9340 B 11 34.1088 41.1133 00.6936 48.2219 e Il 34.3168 42.9034 17.1163 51.4900 8 10 38.0924 48.1200 53.9338 58.1476 8 19 39.4272 49.3063 54.2450 59.1853 0 20 43.2693 5IAM 50.0866 SI.692e S 25 52.3231 64.6519 10.0192 71.9846 eznieit a-1 Administrative and Clerical • Data: 29 AO0 1115 ORION.COOR . 300 Onion Table Job dsade Cade Md. Jobtitle Avtb Cade Min Nax Mn mi. NO NNK 300 1121 Fix TBCWRCIAN l Leis 17.8110 22.LB62 3.096.6269 3,945.1000 200 L227 SR ACCI CLERK 5 1004 13.6116 16.9538 2,310.2107 2.939.6587 300 1229 ACCT CLERK S 1002 12.9454 13.6148 2.114.5360 2,701.5653 300 1922 GRAPHICS COORO 1 sale 17.3452 22.5888 3.006.5013 3,742.0587 300 1924 DORMICE SVCS ANSI 1 loll 16.1916 20.1571 2,806.5440 3,493.0973 300 1114 SR 52ORESEESPBR 2 1013 16.4182 20.43S2 2.845.6213 3,542.1013 300 3916 STORBSRBBPBR 6 1003 13.5239 16.0405 2,344.2427 2,919.0200 300 2210 "MIN ASST 1 1012 16.6330 20.7O73 2.992.7067 2,509.2153 300 2225 SECRITARY 14 1007 14.2961 17.7081 2.471.2573 3,083.2707 300 2227 SR OFFICE AI0E 1 1004 13.9166 16.9530 2,310.2107 2,138.9587 300 2229 OFFICE AIOP 2 1002 12.5454 15.6148 2,174.5310 2.706.5193 300 2231 SR CI.071R 20 1002 12.3434 15.6148 2,174.5360 2.906.5653 300 2239 CLERK 5 1001 11.2373 13.9111 1.949.1907 2,424.2600 300 Sill INFO SVCS TECH III 3 1019 19.0859 23.7621 3.300.2227 4,118.7640 exblbie R-2 Engineering Dace: 29 AW 1995 ONION.COOR - 900 Onion Table Job evade Code Code Jobcicle Aen C00e Min Mex Me Mln Ne Nax 900 3333 SR SNO MSOC 1 1026 22,3510 21.8306 3,916.1733 4,023.9707 900 3329 SN0 MSOC 6 1023 20.3013 25.2712 3.518.8120 4,302.2080 900 3236 ENI AIDE III 3 1015 17.3952 11.5999 3.001.5013 3,742.0507 900 3235 RMO AIDS II 3 1009 15.7590 19.1215 2.732.5600 3,401.0600 900 3236 END AIDS I 3 1006 14.1934 17.6645 2.460.1893 3.061.8467 900 3316 $R CONSTE INSP 6 1025 21.3004 26.5225 3.692.0193 4,517.2333 900 3317 CONSTR INSP 11 1020 19.0976 24.2565 31377.9507 4,204.4100 E Ih1[ a-3 Technical Services 00[e: 29 AM 1115 MW.000E . 100 OeioO TeLla SOO 0[a0a COO! 0000 SOO[SC10 .1h COOe ele MOx b Mi. ft IYI[ 700 622) A SM' SPEC 1 10)6 20.7131 35.0015 3,512.0107 4.472.2600 700 621S OW SPEC II 6 2011 IS.S105 1).11)5 3.14.1560 4.004.0733 700 9117 SW SPEC I 1 1010 15J620 I9.7SS6 2.741A133 ).6)6.2613 ]00 6516 BE L A YST 11 1019 U.5709 23.1235 3,218.1560 4.001.0733 700 6527 LN N YST 30 1010 1S.9630 19.7S54 1.169.4133 3.426.2113 700 6716 SOURCE C!A). XMP iI 19 1015 18.5701 23.1233 3.318.9S60 6.008.0733 ISO .110 SOURCE ML TECe 3 1005 13.1050 53.3143 2.410.2000 3.001.1952 SRAibit B•4 Operations and Maintenance Date: 29 AM 1115 UNION.CODB • Sao Union Table Jab Dead. Cade Cade Jebtitle Been Code Min Max Me is Me Max Soo 1114 SR PLANT OPERATOR 28 2013 18,4782 23.0102 3,202.9880 3.908.4349 Sao 611E PLANT' OPERATOR 49 2008 16.2115 20.0144 2,794.0.67 3.411.0293 500 6214 PUMP POWER OPERATOR 13 2013 18.4782 23.0102 3,202.06.0 3,166.4367 Soo 6.97 CTAL C R CLERK 10 2002 12.5969 15.676E 2,183.4627 2,717.2173 Soo 7215 LEAD NORRAR 6 2012 11.0602 22.2377 31095.3680 3,854.5347 Soo 7217 SR NICE WORKER 8 2007 11.7313 18.356E 2,S54.8120 3,1B1.4660 500 0211 MICE WORKER 10 2005 13,3100 11.1757 2.320.9333 2.890.4547 Soo 7325 GROENDSKEEPRR 6 2003 12.7617 15,6929 2,212.0280 2,754.7693 Soo 7329 HEL➢ER ] 2000 1.7747 12.14.E 1.614.2.13 2,110.26.0 Soo 7332 MACHINIST 1 2012 17.8602 22.2377 31095.1160 3,054.53.7 Soo 7333 WRLOER 3 2011 11,1890 20.9090 2,910,0933 3,624.2261 Soo 9334 EQUIPMENT OPERATOR 3 2010 16.05] 20.76.E 2.990.45.7 3.599.2320 Soo 933S BUILDER 3 2009 16.2225 20.1983 2.611.9000 3,501.0367 Soo 733E PAINTER T 2007 14.7393 16.IS66 2.SS4,0120 3,191.46.0 Soo 961S LEAD COLL PAC WORKER l 2012 17.8102 22.2377 3,015.7180 3,854.5347 Soo 7617 Be COLL PAC MORKBR 9 2007 14.7393 18.3541 2,554.6120 3,181.46.0 Soo 7418 COLL PAC WORKER II 9 2005 13.3900 16.67ST 2,320.9333 2,890A54I Soo 7619 COLL PAC WORKER I 3 2001 10.3309 12.65.E 11710.6813 2.226.0160 Soo 7525 LEAD 96CHANIC ll 2011 18.6182 23 A102 3,202.8800 3,186.43.7 500 7SV SR MECHANIC 23 2011 16.7890 20.9090 2,910.0933 3,624.2267 Soo 751E MECIRMIC 22 2006 14.3E19 17.8602 2,406.1613 3,015.7690 Soo 76I5 LEAD ELECT TECH • 2015 20.1983 25.152E 3,501.0387 4.351.78.0 Soo 7619 ELECT TECH II 9 201E 19,1271 23.813E 3,315.3640 4.127.6907 Soo 76I8 ELRCI TECH I 9 2009 16,2225 20.1983 21911.1000 3,501.0381 Soo 1115 LEAD INSIDE TECH ♦ 2015 20.1983 25.152E 3.SO1.0181 4,351.78.0 Soo ill] INSTR TECH II 30 2014 11.1211 23.8136 3.315.3640 4,127.6107 Soo 111E IBM TECH I 12 2009 16.2225 20.1993 2.811.1000 3,501.0387 • Eu.mit a -5 Professional Gate: 19 SEP 1995 UNION.Caoe . 229 Union Table Job Grade Cade Code Sebeitle duce COae Mi. Ner No Mi. No Max 225 1112 OR PIN ANALYST 3 5 19.9314 20.1963 3,4S5.6429 4,007.3S67 225 1212 9R ACCOONTANT 1 5 19.9364 29,1963 3,4S5.6421 4,887.3507 225 1214 RCCC=ANP 1 1 16J710 23.2343 2,837.1400 4,027.2787 225 1114 PIN ANALYST 1 1 16.3710 23.2343 2,837.6400 4,027.2787 225 1814 ON OMER 1 4 16.1656 21.8881 3.210.8373 4,110.7427 225 1816 OMER 3 I 16.3710 23.2343 2,837.6400 4.021.270E 22S 2211 OR AGAIN REST 1 6 20.9169 29.$926 3,625.57e7 5.121.3640 225 2314 MANAGEMENT ANALYST 1 1 16.3710 23.2343 2.837.6400 4.027.2787 22S 2.4 CONEUCT ADMIN 1 0 23.0561 32.6232 3,996.390E 5.654.6890 225 3114 ENGINEER 19 11 26.7106 37.7931 4,621.8373 6,550.8040 225 3118 ASSOC I LINTER II 3 5 19.1364 28.1163 1,455.6427 4,001.3581 225 3222 PR ENG ASSOC 3 9 24.2446 34.316E 4,202.3973 5,968.2453 225 4114 REGULATORY SPEC 3 9 24.2446 34.316E 4,202.3973 S,948.2.53 225 4221 PR ENP SPEC 2 8 23.0561 32.9232 3,996.3107 S,654.6EE0 225 441S PRCJHC SPEC 1 9 24.2446 34.316E 4,202.3173 S,948.2453 225 4514 PR LAE 6 RES ANALYSP 7 6 20.9168 21.5921 3,625.9787 5.129.3840 225 4114 SCIENTISP 5 9 24.2441 34.316E 4.202.3973 5,948.2453 22S S112 C PPUTER HARDNARE SPEC 1 T 21.986S 31.1080 3.810.9933 5.312.0533 225 Sill TELECOMMUNICATIONS SPEC 1 ] 21.9065 31.1000 3,E10.9933 9.392.0533 225 5212 PROGRAMMER ANALYST B ) 21.986S 31.3080 3,810.9933 S.392.0S33 225 5214 PROGRAMMER 4 4 18.9856 26.0809 3,290.8373 4,160.7427 225 7812 OR MICE PLANNER 3 9 24.2446 34.3168 4,202.3973 5,948.2453 225 7814 MICE PLANNER 2 T 21.9865 33.108E 3,010.9933 5,392.0533 225 0114 RR ANALYST 1 2 19.2326 24.3634 2,981.9840 4,222.9813 22S 6212 SAFETY/EMRR RSSP SPEC 1 9 21.0911 32.1232 3,996.1907 S,654.6880 225 8316 SAFETY MEP 2 • tB.9056 26.8889 3,290.B373 4,160.7427 Supervisory Oates 19 AUG 199S UNION.MOB • 200 Mies Table Sob a." Coda Code .Pebtltle auto Mee Min Ms. Ne Mln MP IYN _____ ______ ______________________________ ____ _____ ________ ________ ____________ ------------ 200 1210 PR ACCOONIANI 1 9 24.2446 16.3140 4,202.3973 5.016.2453 200 1110 PR PIN ANALYST 1 9 24.1946 10.3166 4,202.3973 5,949.2453 200 1910 MARSHOOS6 SWSR 1 6 18.1851 21.8589 3,290.6111 4,660.7427 200 3110 SNUINSSRING SPVSR T la 30.9000 11.7151 5,314.0000 7,900.7953 200 3112 SR RNGMEA 6 11 29.6736 61.6251 5.109.7220 7,225.4347 200 1110 SWSR CONSTR IMP a 9 24.1666 16.2169 4.202.3973 5,949.2453 200 6110 SW MANAGSN6NI SNP 2 11 21.6119 41.6032 S.109.9920 7,225.4167 200 0510 LABORATORY SPVSR 1 12 26.0776 31.7211 4.066.7913 6.115.5651 200 1610 SR SCIENTIST 1 12 21.0771 31.7211 4,866.7191 6,585.5453 200 <710 SOORM CONTROL SWSR 1 9 24.2061 16.2169 4,202.3973 5.049.2453 200 6112 SWSR SOURCE CTRL IMP 2 5 11.9264 28.1143 3.499.6427 6.667.3527 200 6105 S0. OPSMTIONS SWSR 1 11 26.7101 11.1921 4.621.0373 6,550.9040 200 6110 OPERATIONS SWSR 12 S 24.2661 15.3166 4.202.3973 S,969.2651 200 6S10 COMPLIANCE SPVSR 1 12 26.0776 19.7262 4.866.1493 SASS.St31 200 7 10 MAINTEMANCH SWSR S 9 26.2446 10.3168 4,202.1972 S,946.2451 200 7112 FOREMAN 11 7 21.1945 11.1000 3,010.9133 5.312.0533 200 6310 SAFETY SWSR 1 6 20.9168 261926 1,625.5737 6,131 A910 200 6410 TRAINING SPVSR 2 6 23.0911 32,6232 3,996.3907 3.6S6.6990 Exhibit a-] Executive Management Date: 21 36P 1195 UNION.0008 - Lee - Onion Twle Job Grade CO" COOe JnbtiCln Ruth Cade M10 Wz MO Min NO MR. ISO 0001 aBNBPAL MANAGER 1 22 12.5000 62.5000 10.a13.3333 10,633.3333 100 0002 MST GAS MR ADMIX 1 20 43.2913 57.9924 7,900.0120 10,000.0110 Lee 0003 ABET GBN MR OPEM 1 20 43.2913 S7.6924 7.500.0120 10,000.0160 LOG 1000 DIR OF FINANCE 1 16 30.8924 58.1471 6,742.3493 10.217.5140 100 2100 SEC1Y TO THE a" VIA 1 SO 25.4033 35.9006 4,403.2387 6,236.6373 100 3000 DIR OF 6NGIMERING 1 19 31.4272 59.1953 6,834.0460 10,25B.1853 Lee 4000 DIR Of TECHNICAL, SVCS 1 19 39.4272 59.1853 6,834.0480 10,25B.7853 100 SOUP DIR OF INFO TECH 1 17 34.3166 51.4900 5,948.2451 8,124.9333 Le0 6000 DIR OF OPBGTTONS 1 19 39.4272 59.1853 6,834.0400 10,150.7853 LOP 9000 DIR OF MAINTENANCE 1 19 31.42" 59.1653 6,834.0480 10,258.7B53 100 $000 DIR or HE 1 17 34.3116 51.4100 5,149.2453 0,124.1333 Management ONION.CODE . 17S Union Table Sob Grade Code Code Jobcitle Ruch Cede Min Msx Ho Mib 6b Ass STS OS00 COMNNIGTIOMS DIR 1 9 24.2446 34.3168 4.202.3173 5,946.24S3 175 Liao FINANCTAL AGE 1 15 32.4747 45.1340 5,629.1400 7.161.8133 175 1200 CONTROLLER 1 15 32.4747 45.1340 5,920.9440 7.961.0933 195 T201 ACCOONIZNG MR 1 13 29.473E 41.6851 S.106.7910 7,22S.4347 I75 LOUD NMCEASING MR 1 12 20.O774 39.7243 4,911.7413 6.005.5453 195 2214 PR MNIN MST 1 9 24.3444 34.3168 4,202.3973 5,940.1453 175 2221 ® =IVE MST II 2 1027 18.1754 22.6295 3.150.4027 3.922.5160 175 1223 ®2COTIVE MST I 1 1012 11.4310 20.7073 2.882.7067 3.S69.1653 175 3100 ENGINEERING MOR 1 16 34.1O00 48.2220 5,912.1920 9,358.4053 1T5 3300 CONSTROCTIOE MG 1 16 34.1066 48.2211 5,912.1920 8,350.4453 175 4112 SR REGULATORY SPEC 1 12 20.0114 39.7243 4,966.7493 6,995.5453 ITS 4300 BEN HAEAGE!®FI MR 1 16 34.1018 46-2218 5,912.1920 9,350.4453 1T5 4500 LMOMMRY MR 1 16 34.1088 48.2218 5,912.1920 8,358.4453 175 4600 CHIEF SCIENTIST 1 14 30.9000 43.7353 5.356.0000 7.580.78S3 IYS 4700 SOURCE CONTROL MR 1 16 34.1080 48.2218 5.912.1920 8.358.4453 1T5 flea NARIINARE SYS MR 1 11 26.7101 37.7931 4,629.6373 6,550.0040 175 5200 SOFZMARZ SYS MR 1 11 16.7106 37.7931 4,621.9373 6,550.8040 I75 6100 CHIEF OPERATOR 2 13 21.4739 41.6852 5.300.7910 7,225.4347 175 6101 OPERATIONS MR, 1 12 29.0774 39.1243 4,866.7413 6.885.5453 175 8110 NIX SWAP. 1 9 24.2446 34.316E 4,202.3173 5.149.2453 275 8113 SR HR ANALYST 2 6 20.1146 21.3126 3,625.5981 5.129.3840 275 B11T RR MST 2 2011 14.4310 20.7073 2,802.7067 3,SB9.2651 175 8200 BAFSIY/00aR MAP MR 1 13 21.4730 01.6852 9,108.7120 7,225.434T 175 8400 TRATRIMG MR 1 10 23.4033 35.9806 4,403.2187 6,236.6373 eaoiblt 8.8 Unrepresented Date: 29 AM ills - UNION.COOe 150 Union Table Job DTsee Code Cede Jobt"le Autn Cede Min Max Me Min No Mex ... ...... .. .. ,so 1190 INTERN 19 9as 9.2100 11.0000 1,101.8000 2,)73.]II3 Unrepresented UNION.CODE • 999 Union Table Job a." Cede Cede JebCiale Autb Code Min Maa Me Min Me Max .. 999 ills STORE8RE9NR ABET 1 104 6.1E00 11.9853 1.071.2000 2,233,4520 999 2299 M MST 0 903 6.1000 10.SI87 1,071.2000 1,837.1080 999 1199 M A99T-SOIOpiR 28 $01 .0000 6.0000 .0000 1,040,0000 emisle e Peaitlee evd Seletlq by Divlalm Oats: L AOG 1$$5 Div. Job Aurb COOe !010 Job Title Fo. Grade Salary Rugea Metbly "law Reamed )150 0001 OSNBRN. PAKA05R 1.00 10 $12.3000 - $62.S000 10,9)).)))) . $10.8)).)))) 2160 9002 ASST OW MR ADBIR 1.00 20 $91.)69) - $ST.6934 $7.500.0120 - S10.000.0190 21SO 0001 ASST GER NCR OPERS 1.00 10 063.26$3 - $ST.6124 S7.S00.0130 - $10.000.0160 )SSO 2221 EXE=Ive ASYl II 2.00 1027 $10.17N - 8)).1211 S1.330.6027 - $3.922.S160 1150 5.60 Giv. Job here Code Code Job Title Fro Go.dd Salary RaeSea Marbly "law RaORee .. --- 2110 1100 SEM TO TM BM OIR 1.00 10 $25.4031 - $3S.9606 $4.403.))07 - $6.))6.6)7) 2160 II25 SECRRTRRY 1.00 1001 $14.2061 - $17.7901 $1.676.2S73 - $3.083.2707 lied 1.00 Div. Job each Toole Coda Jab Title Pte Grade Salary ranged W.ihly Salary Rae9se ..... ..... ...................... ...... ..... .... -------------------- - ------------------------ 2170 E116 R DgRll AS 1.00 ) 524.1446 - $34.316. r4.101.1913 - SS.969.2e51 2110 1.00 Rctibit C Position and Salaries by Division Dee.: 19 8&9 lots Div. Job Such Code Cade Job Title Ft. Grade Selery Senses Monthly Selery Mass. 2190 0500 CORKORIMTIORS SIR 1.00 9 $24.2446 - $34.3166 $4,202.3973 - $5.940.2453 2190 2226 SR ADRIR RSST 1.00 6 820.916E - $29.5136 $3,625.5]8] - $3,129.3840 2190 1722 OMPHICS CWRD 1.00 lots $17.3451 • $21.5886 $3,006.5013 • $3,742.0567 2190 2228 ADRIR MET 1.00 3012 $11.1310 - $20.1013 $2,892.7067 • $3,509.2153 2190 1724 GRAPHICS SVCS MST 1.00 1011 $16.1916 - $20.i571 $2,006.S440 - $3,413.8973 2190 2215 SECRETARY 1.00 1007 $24.2061 - $17.7891 $2,476d573 • $3,083.2707 2190 2227 SR OFFICE SIDS 1.00 3004 $13.1111 - 811.1539 $2,360.2101 - $2,93B.6547 2190 9990 INTERN 1.00 as $9.2700 • $16.0000 $1.104-8000 - $2,713.3333 2190 2229 OFFICE SIDS 2.00 1002 $12.5454 • $15.6148 $2.174.5360 - $2,706.5153 2190 2237 SR CLEM 1.00 1002 $12.5454 - $15.1148 $2,174.9310 • $2,701.5153 2190 2239 CLERK 1.00 2001 $11.2373 - $13.9979 $2,147.7987 - $2,126.2190 2190 12.00 Div. Job Ruch Cede Code Job Title Fee Grade Selery Range. Eenchly salary Rousso. _____ _____ ______________________ ______ _____ _________________________ __________________________ 2210 1000 SIR OP FINANCE 1.00 1B $38.6924 - $98.9471 $1,741.3413 - 810,217.5940 2210 1100 FINANCIAL HIS 1.00 15 $32.4747 - $45.9340 $5.628.9480 - $7,111.0133 2210 2320 M FIR AXAJUM 1.00 9 $24.2446 - $34.3160 $4,202.3173 $5.949.2453 2210 2223 ERECPIIVE MST I 1.00 1012 $11.6310 - $20.1073 $2,602.7067 - $3,501.2653 2210 4.00 exhibit C Poeition am Salaries by Division Date: 24 AM 1995 Div. Job Auth Code Code Job Title Ft. Grade Salary Randes Monthly Salary Ranyes ----- ----- ---------------------- ------ ----- ------------------------- -------------------------- 2220 1200 CONTROLLER 1.00 15 $32.4747 - 645.9340 $5,629.9460 - $7,911.8933 2220 1201 ACCOUNTING MGR 1.00 13 529.038 - $41.6852 95.106.7910 - $7.225.4341 2120 1210 PR ACCOUNTANT 3.00 9 $24.2441 - $34.3118 $4.202.3173 - $5,948.2453 2220 1310 PR BIN ANALYST 1.00 9 $24.2446 - $34.3166 $4,202.3973 - $5,940.2452 2220 1212 RE ACCOUNTANT 1.00 5 $19.1364 - $28.1963 $3,455.6429 - $4.887.3987 2220 1214 ACCOUNTANT 1.00 1 $11.3710 - $23.2343 $2,837.6400 - $4,027.2787 2220 1314 PIN ANALYST 1.00 1 $11 J430 - $23.2343 $2,937.6400 - $4,027.2787 2220 1121 PIN TECHNICIAN 1.00 1017 $17.8190 - $22.1862 $3,098.1267 - $3.845.1080 2220 1227 SR ACCT CLERK 5.00 1004 $13.1166 - $16.9538 $2,310.2107 - $2,939.6507 2220 1221 ACCT CLERK S.00 1002 $12.5454 - $1S.6146 $2.174.5310 - $2,701.5153 2220 20.00 Div. Job In Cade Cade Jab Title Ft. trade Salary lengee Monthly Salary Sondes .. 2230 1800 PURCHASING MR 1..0 12 $28.0774 - $39.7243 $4,816.7493 - $6,885.5453 2230 L814 SR BUYER 1.00 4 $18.9851 - $26.0889 $3,290.8373 - $4,660.7427 2230 L910 WAREHOUSE SPVSR 1.00 4 918.985E - $21.9881 $3,210,9373 - $4.660,7427 2230 L816 BUYER 3.00 1 $16.3710 - $23.2343 $2.837,6400 - $4,027.2707 2230 1114 SR STORESKESPER 2.00 1013 $16.4L82 - $20.4352 $2,845.8213 - $3,542.1013 2230 2225 SECRETARY 1.00 1007 $14.2461 - $17.7881 $2.416.2513 - $3,083.2707 2230 1116 STORESKEBPER 1.00 1003 $13.5239 - $16.0405 $2,344.1427 - $2.111.0200 2230 2231 SR CLERK 2.00 1002 $12.5454 - $15.1148 $2,114.5360 - $2,701.5653 2230 L919 STORESKEEPBR MST 1.00 904 $1.1800 - $12.0853 $L,011.2000 - $2,233.4520 2230 18.00 exhibit C PNleien eed Nleslae by Dlvlelon Date, 2e AM LOSS Div. all; ARM Code Coda Job Title Ste Green 8e1ary Nage9 Monthly Salary Range. ..... ..... ...................... ...... ..... ......................... .......................... 2e10 5000 DIR OF IMM TOCM 1.00 17 614.116E - $91.4900 $9,946.2493 - $8,924.9222 gels 211e MAMMRMRM' MIALYST 1.00 1 $14.3110 - $23.23e3 $2,917.9400 - $4,027.2107 2e10 2221 gIRCOIIYB MST I 1.00 1412 $14.6310 - $20.0E01 $2,093.7067 - S1,5B9.265I 2610 3.00 Div. Job wth Cade Cade Jab Title pt. Gtada saucy R9egee NNthly Salary "Meg ..... ..... ...................... ...... ..... ......................... .......................... 2420 5100 HARDWARE SYS MOR 1.00 11 $26.7106 - $37.7931 $4.425.8272 - $6,990.3040 2420 5112 COMPUTER IOMIDMAM SPEC 1.00 Y 511.9065 - $31.1080 $3,810.9911 - $9,192.OS11 2620 5111 TELECOMMUNICATIONS PPE 1.00 Y $21.9845 - $31.1O80 $3,910.99II - $9,192.OS33 2620 Sill INTO SM TECH III 1.00 102E SLO.0959 - $23.7121 $3.306.2220 - $4,120.79e0 2e20 i.00 Div. Jab .Roth Code Cede Job Title Ott Otede Nlery Renge9 MMtbly Below Nngee ..... ..... ...................... ...... ..... ......................... .......................... 2e10 111e SMINT6R 1.00 11 $26.7104 - SI7.7911 $4,429.0372 - 56,SSO.90e0 20I0 8200 SO MME SYS MR 1.00 11 216.710E - $37.7131 /e,529.8271 - OC.550.80e0 2410 S222 PROGRAMMER MALYSi 1.00 l $21.9665 - $31.1690 01,810.9911 - $5,392.0811 2920 5214 PROGRAMMER 0.00 C $18.0056 - 026.968E 61,290.9171 - $4,660.7427 2e10 125E ROD AIDE II 1.00 100E $IS.7590 - $11.1213 $2,731.5600 - S1.e01.0100 2e20 2219 CLEAR 1.00 1001 011.2111 - 011.HTY S1,1e0.09e7 - 02.426.2690 2e10 17.00 RRhlbit C 9o.ition and Salaries by Division Date: 29 AUG 1995 Div. Job note Code Code Job Title Fee Grade Salary Ranges ...rely Salary Range. 2510 goes DIR or MR 1.00 19 $34.3110 - $51.0900 $5.908.2451 - $8,924.9333 2510 2223 S%SMIW REST I 1.00 1012 $16.6110 - $20.1073 $2,892.7067 - $3,589.2651 2510 2.00 Div. Job Korb Cede Cede Job Title yte Orate Salary Ranges Monthly Salary Ranges ..... ..... ...................... ...... ..... ......................... .......................... 2520 $400 TRAINING NOR 1.00 10 $25.4033 - $35.9806 $4,403.2397 - $1,231.137) 2520 8110 MR SEVER 2.00 9 $24.2066 - $34.3168 $4,202.3173 - $5,946.2453 2520 $010 TRAINING S9V6R 1.00 6 $23.0561 - $32.6232 S3,996.3901 - $5,654.6880 2520 $113 ER RK ANALYST 2.00 6 $20.9169 - $29.5921 $3.125.5101 - $9,129.3040 2$20 $110 M ANALYST 1.00 2 $17.2326 - $24.3634 $2,186.9840 - $4,222.9413 2$20 $127 MR ASST 1.00 1012 516.6310 - $20.7073 $2,882.7067 - S3,509.2651 2520 2225 SECESCARY 1.00 1007 $14.2661 - $17.7692 $2,016.2573 - $3,003.2707 2520 2231 SR CLERK 2.00 1002 $12.5054 - $1S.6149 $2,116.5360 - $2,706.5653 2520 10.00 Rtlllbit C 9o.ition ani Sala[1aa by Division Bata: 26 Ma 1115 Div. Job wcb Code Cade Job Title Ste gram Salary ungae Monthly $glary singes 2510 9200 SAPSTY/2N3R 8$SP WR 1.00 11 $29.9119 - 591.6852 $S,109.1920 - $1.225.4341 ills 0212 SASBTY/EMIR MP S96C 1.00 0 121.0561 - $32.4232 $1.996A907 - $5,154.1880 2510 0310 SAFI= SMS1 1.a0 6 $20.9160 - 621.S926 $3.129.5187 - 55.121.3840 2510 8116 SAP$TY RSS 2.00 6 $10.9956 - $21.9889 $3.210.8211 - 56.660.1621 2510 ...I He MST 1.00 1012 $11.1310 - $20.7071 $2,892.7061 - $3.581.2153 2510 1910 INTERS 1.00 905 $9.2700 - $16.0000 $1.101.8000 - $2.773.3333 2510 7.00 Div. Job Ascb Cade Cam Jab Title yce area salary Ranges lbncbly Solaty Boer. ..... ..... ...................... ...... ..... ......................... .......................... 1110 7000 DIR OF SISNT612MC8 1.00 l9 $31.4272 - 559.1051 $6,8I0.0480 - $10.258.7851 1110 ills @FINNU I.00 11 321.7100 - $37.7931 $4,121.0272 - 56.550.8060 3310 2221 B CVTIW MST 1 I.00 M2 $16.6310 - $20.7073 $2.802.7017 - 52,569.2651 I110 2225 SEC TMY 2.00 1007 $14.2911 - $17.7081 $2,676.2571 - 53.083.2707 2110 1190 IM'BR21 2.00 105 $1.2700 - $11.0000 $1,101.6000 - $2.773.2333 3310 2217 SR MERR I.00 10.2 $12.5959 - $15.6100 $2.176.S360 - $2,706.5153 1210 2219 CLBRR 2.00 1001 511.2311 - 511.9911 $1.9<9.7187 - $2.421.2660 2I10 10.00 Div. Jab Roth Code Cade Job Title Ft. geode Salary Rage. Monthly Salaty Ranges ___ 1120 7100 MAIM@gNCS FR 1.00 12 $20.0774 - 519.7243 $4.811.7493 - $6.065.5951 1120 7922 SR H CS 9LAMN0R 3.00 9 $24.2446 - $34.3168 $4.202.3991 - $1.969.2951 1120 7914 NTCR 9WDM8R 2.00 l $21.9865 - $31.1080 $1.810.9911 - SSJ92.0533 1120 6.00 ' Rehibit C PesitiOR .n0 Salaries by D1v1PlOo Dete: 16 AIM 199S Div. i0! fteh Cade Cade iee Title Pee a.." Selety Ranee Nentnly "let, Revges __ __ _____ ______________________ ______ _____ _________________________ __________________________ 3330 1100 NAINSNRRCS MR 1.00 12 $28.0776 - $21.7243 $4.811.1693 - $1.865.56S1 3330 1110 IUIM'OIRRR SPOSR 1.00 9 $24.2666 - $34.3168 $4.202.3173 - $3.146.2453 3330 7112 P0R03W[ 3.00 1 S21.9865 - $31.1080 $3,810.1133 - $5,391.0533 3330 121S LRAO RORROI 1.00 2013 $17.6102 - $22.2311 $3.015.7680 - S3.859.5391 3330 7335 RMLDCR 3.00 2001 $11.2225 - $20.1113 $2,111.1000 - $3.501.0387 3330 7217 OR N WRQR 6.00 2007 $14.7312 - SlBd566 $2.550.8120 - 53.191.4640 3330 7336 PAINTER 7.00 2007 $16.7313 - $18.3541 $2.556.e120 - $3,101.4640 1330 1219 N WR93@ 10.00 2005 $13.3100 - $16.6151 $2,320.9333 - $2,810.4561 3330 7325 ORO KCEPER 6.00 200) $12.1117 - $15.8929 $2.212.0280 - $2.1S6.1693 3330 7329 RELPER 7.00 2000 $1.1161 - 512.1166 $1.614.2813 - $2.110.2140 3330 $2.00 Div. Job Ante Code Cede Soh Title Pce Oeade Salae Ranges Monthly Salary Rages ..... ..... ...................... ...... ..... ......................... .......................... 3360 7100 MAIM283p MR 1.00 12 $10.0119 - $31.7243 $4,861.1493 - $1.9e5.5653 3340 7110 MASN2BIDWC$ SWSR 1.00 9 $26.2666 - $34.3168 $4.202.3973 - $S.140.2651 3360 1112 POROtAN 2.00 1 A1.9165 - $31.10SO $3.810.1933 - $S.392.0533 3360 161S LEAD W" PAC WORKER 1.00 2012 SI1J602 - $22.2377 93.095.16e0 - $3.856.S367 3360 7417 SR M" PAC WRWR 9.00 2007 $14.7313 - S1B.3566 $2.556.9120 - $3,161.4640 2260 1618 LOLL PAC MRPBR II 9.00 2001 $13.3100 - $16.6151 $2,320.1333 - $2.690A501 3360 1611 LOLL PAC RDRPBR I 3.00 2001 $10.3305 - $12.SS44 $1.710.1993 - $2.226.0010 3340 32.00 Zxhibla C e Poeicioe W salatLea by Divieim Dec*: 20 ROD 1999 - Div. Jab .Rite COGe Cede JOb Title yte 0eeae "law 6eeS*e MOeCbly Salary Ree$ea _____ _____ ______________________ ______ _____ _________________________ __________________________ 3350 7100 MAINTENAMCE MR 1.00 11 $28.0716 - $31.7243 $e,961.7493 - $6.96S.S951 3350 7110 MAIMPNANCE SPVSR 1.00 9 $24.1666 - $34.3268 04.202.3173 - $S.963.1493 33SO Till PoREN.N 3.00 T $21.1865 - $31.1860 $3.010.993 - $S,392.0311 3350 T91S LEAD MECHANIC 11.00 2013 $16.9761 - $23.0102 a.392.9840 - $3e88.4347 33SO Tlll HACMIMIST 1.00 3013 $17.5602 - $22.1377 $3.09S.1600 - $3.6M.5347 3350 7)33 WELDER 3.00 2011 $11.7910 - 330.9090 $3.910.0911 - $3.63e.2217 3350 TSIT St MECMDNIC 23.00 2011 $i6.7990 - $20.9010 $2.920.0133 - $3,624.3217 3350 7334 EOEIPMEM OPERATOR ).00 2010 $16.6757 - 020.7669 $2,010.4567 - $3.599.2120 33SO 191E NCCE M 22.00 200E $N-0479 - $17.6602 $3.166.1613 - $2,015.7680 also 18.00 MI. Job Satb Code Cade Jab Title Ste S3Sde salew RaOSaa Msecbly ft"" Regae _____ _____ ______________________ ______ _____ _________________________ __________________________ 3390 7110 MAIMR3AMC S90ER 1.00 9 $26.2946 - $30.316* $4,202.3973 - $5.940.2453 3310 1112 90RtKAR 3.00 T $31.966S - $31.1090 $3.e30.9913 - $S.192.0531 3310 761S LMAD ELECT TECE 4.00 2015 $10.Dtl - $25.2521 $3.S01.0387 - $4,3S9.7640 3360 7617 ELECT TEM II 9.00 301E $11.1271 - $23.0136 $2,315.3940 - $4,127.6107 ))60 7616 ELECT TECH I 9.06 2001 314.2125 - $20.1983 $2,811.1000 - $3.S01.0367 3360 26.00 Div. Jab A Wft Code Coda Job Title ". Ot*sa salary Raoge6 Moeably Salty Ra - IITO 7100 MAIRl6NANCE MR 1.00 12 $20.0774 - $39.7243 $4.666.7693 - $6.66S.59S1 ))70 Te IO MAINTENANCE SPVER 1.00 9 $24.100 - $34.3166 $4,202.3173 - $S.M6.2453 3310 Till $0R61MN 2.00 T $21.965 - 131.1080 S).BIO J93) - 55.312.0533 ))TO "IS LEAD IM R TECH 4.00 2015 620.1103 - 32S.1536 $3.501.0381 - $4.331.7640 3370 7717 INSTR TUCK II 37.00 1614 $11.127% - $23.9136 $).31S.)690 - $6.i27.6907 2370 7710 INSTR TECH [ U.00 2001 $16.2225 - $20.190 $2.911-1000 - $3.S61.0347 3370 27.00 Exhibit C POnition and Salariee by Diviefon Data: 24 ADS 1119 Div. Job Auth Cade Cade Jab Title Pte GKRde Salary Rob$aa Monthly Ralary Ran9aS _____ _____ -------------------- ------ ----- ------------------------- ____.___________._______-- 3410 6000 GIR OF OPERATIONS 1.00 19 $39.4272 $59.18S3 $6,334.0480 $10,2S$.7853 3410 3110 ZVOINEERINC SPVSR 1.00 14 $30.1000 - $43.7393 S9,336.0000 - $1.960.9893 3410 6530 CONPL3ANCE SPVSR 1.00 11 121.0714 - $31.7243 $4,066.7413 - $6.SSS.5453 3410 3334 QIOINERA S.00 11 $26.7106 $37.7931 $4,629.8373 - $1,550.9040 3410 44LS PROJECT SPEC 1.00 9 524.2446 $34.3163 $4,202.3973 - $5,948.2453 3410 3117 ASSOC ENGINEER I1I 1.00 R $23.0561 $32.1232 $3,919.3107 - $S,694.6960 3410 9410 TRAINING SPVSR 1.00 E $23.0561 $32.6232 93,994.3907 - SS.GS4.6990 3410 3I1R ASSOC ENOINEER SI 1.00 9 $19.9364 $28.1163 $3,415.6417 - $4,807.3547 3420 2314 MANA98MENT ANALYST 1.00 1 $11.3710 - $23.2343 $2,837.6400 - $4,027.1717 3410 4225 RNV SPEC II 1.00 1010 818.5709 - $23.1235 03,219.1560 - $4,000.0733 3410 2223 9XICOTIVE ASET 3 1.00 1012 516.6310 $20.7073 03.902.7017 - $1,509.26S3 3410 1990 INTERN $.00 905 $1.2700 - $19.0000 $1,406.8000 - S2,773.3333 3410 2237 RR CWRK %.DO 1002 $12.5454 - 015.6240 $2,194.S360 $2,706.5453 3410 2231 CLERK 1.00 1001 $11.2373 $13.9977 $1.947.7987 $2,426.2690 3410 22.00 Div. Job Ruth Cafe Code Job Title no Ono$ salary Ranee Monthly Salary RanRee 3490 6100 CKIEP OPERATOR 2.OG 13 $29.4731 - $41.6052 $5,104.7920 - $7,225.4347 3480 6101 OPERATIONS MGR 1.00 12 $20.0774 - $31.7243 64,966.1493 - $9,905.5453 3400 6Ia5 $A OPERATSONS SPVSR 2.00 11 S26.710i - $37.7931 $4,129.2373 - $6,990.E040 3480 6110 OPERATIONS SPVSR 12.00 9 $24.2446 - $34.319S $4,202.3973 - $5.945.24$3 3480 1114 31 PLANT OPERATOR 28.00 2013 $10.4792 $23.0102 $3,202.9980 - $3,169.4347 3400 6214 PUMP POSER OPERATOR 12.00 2013 $18.4762 - $23.0102 $3,202.9980 - $3,908.4347 3480 7334 EOUIPMENT OPERATOR 3.00 2010 416.4757 - $20.7649 $2.690.4S41 $3,519.2320 3480 6116 PLANT OPERATOR 41.00 2008 411.119S - 820.0644 $2.714.0467 - $3,477.0293 3400 6497 CPRL CTN CLERK 10.00 2002 $11.S969 - $15.6761 $2.193.4627 - $2,117.2173 3460 119.00 6Alblt C Poe1C10e aa0 Salaries by Division Der.: 2a A00 1115 Div. JOB Aurb COEe Code Job Title yre DIED. Salary Range. W.Thly Salary RaO9O6 .. 3510 6000 OUR OF TSCIVICAL SVCS 1.00 l9 $39.4272 - $59.1853 $1,034.0480 - 5l0.258.1853 3510 6112 $R SKALATORY SPEC 1.00 12 $20.0774 - $39.7243 $4.966.1493 - $1.485.5453 3510 4110 ESOOWTORY SPEC 3.00 9 $20.2446 - $34.3168 $4,202.3173 - $5,948.2453 3510 6225 ERV SPEC II 1.00 1018 $18.5701 - 523.1335 $3.216.9560 - $4,000.0733 I510 2223 EXECUTIVE KS$ I 1.00 1012 $11.6310 - $20.7073 $2,002.7017 - 51.589.2653 3510 2225 SECRETARY 1.00 1007 $14.2061 - $17.7881 $2,476.2573 - $3.083.2707 3510 9910 IIM1BRN 1.00 1.5 59.2100 - $11.0000 $1.606.8000 - $2.323.3333 3510 15.00 Div. Jeb SD.h Cede Cede JOB Title Pt. Grade Salary RangeB RoetRly Salary Ra.Eee _____ _____ ______________________ ______ _____ _________________________ __________________________ 3550 4300 ENV MAMAOEPOUNT MLR 1.00 16 $34.1088 - $48.2218 $5.112.1920 - $8.350.4453 3SSO 4600 CHIEF SCIEMIUSC ..Do 16 $30.1009 - $43.1353 $5.351.0000 - $1.590.1OS3 3550 6310 RW MAE.W'HMOR SOP 2.00 13 $29.8130 - $41.1852 $5.108.1920 - 07,225.4361 3SSO 4610 S0. SCISIRIST ..Do 12 $24.0116 - $31.7243 $4.061.1413 - $1.005.5643 3550 3214 ENGINEER 1.00 li $21.7101 - $37.7131 $4.121.0373 - 56.550.6O40 3550 6616 SCIEWI9T 1.00 9 $24.2666 - $34.3118 $4.202.3973 - $5,949.2651 3550 3117 ASSOC SNGIWER III 1.00 0 $23.0561 - $32.1232 $3.111.3901 - $5,654.6800 3550 6221 PR EW SPEC 1.00 8 $23.0511 - 532.6232 $3.996J907 - $S.ISI.6890 3550 5223 SR SW SPEC 1.00 1024 $20.7231 - $25.8015 $3.592.0901 - $4.512.2100 3550 6225 EW SPEC II 2.00 101E $12.5701 - $23.1235 53.218.9560 - 64.008.0733 3SSO 4111 EW SPEC I 1.00 1010 SiS.6620 - $19.1556 $2.169.4133 - $3.424.2113 3550 2225 SECRETARY 1.00 1007 $14.2011 - $17.7661 $2.616.2573 - 53.003.2131 35SO 2237 SR CLERK 2.00 1002 S12.S4S4 - $IS.6168 $2.116.5360 - $2.306.5653 3550 16 00 ESAltlt C POSitlen and Salatlee by Oillolon Oat., 16 AM 199S OIV. Job AntR Coda Code Job Title Pta Gtade Salary Rat9aa Nentbly Salary Rana. ---- ----- ---------------------- ------ ----- ------------------------- -------------------------- 3960 6500 LARORATONY NOR 1.00 16 $34.1068 - 660.22LO $5,912.1920 . 06,159.663E 3540 6310 LABORATORY SPVSR 6.00 12 S20.0116 019.106E 06.066.1693 • 06,065.S6SE 3590 461E SCIENTIST 9.00 1 024.2666 - $34.3119 64,102.3973 • 06,110.2453 3590 651E PR EAR 6 RSS ANALYST 7.00 6 $20.9169 619.591E $3,629.5797 • 09,129.1000 3500 6516 SR LAR ANALYST 11.00 Lois $18.5701 021.121S $3.210.9560 . 06,009.013E 3900 IS17 LAS ANALYST 10.00 1010 SIS.9620 019.19S6 $2.169.4133 . 01.616.2603 ISM 2225 SECRETARY 1.00 1007 $14.2611 - $17.7981 02,476.2571 - $3,093.2707 3560 22E1 SR CLERK 2.00 1002 012.565E - $15.9169 01,116.SE60 . $2,704.5653 IMP 2211 PT MST 6.00 903 S6.1100 - $10.3981 $1,071,2000 - 01,031.3000 3590 •67.00 Cie. Job Ateb Cede Cede Jab Title ft. Evade Salary RMSae Nattily Salary Raryae ..... ..... ...................... ...... ..... ......................... .......................... 3590 4700 SOERCS CONTROL MR 1.00 16 $14.1089 - E60.2319 Q.911.1910 - S6,159.44S3 3590 3112 SR ENGINEER 2.00 1E $29.6130 - $42.6092 09.L60.1920 - $7,235.6101 3590 311E ENGINEER 2.00 11 $26.7106 . $31.7931 $4,629.6373 - $1,550.4040 3590 4710 SOURCE CKETTOL EWER 1.00 9 $24.1666 • $34.3163 $4.202.3173 • 55.900.165E 3590 3111 ASSOC SNGINEER III 9.00 9 $23.0961 - $32.6232 $3.511.3107 - 05,656.69E0 3510 631E PR ENV SPEC 1.00 9 023.OS61 • $32.6232 $3,114.3907 - $5,154.6440 3510 ills ASSOC ENGINEER 53 1.00 5 $19.9364 • $20.1563 SI.955.6417 • 04,867.3597 3590 611E EWER SOURCE CTRL IMP 2.00 5 019.916E - $20.2963 13,6SS.6621 - 94,097.1097 3510 6114 SOURCE =L INSP II 10.00 1016 $18.5109 • S11.111S $3,218.1560 - $4,009.0733 3590 ILLS SECRETARY 1.00 1007 $14.2861 • 011.7001 $2.916.2573 • S1,OE1.2701 3510 471S SOURCE ME, TECH 3.00 1005 $13.9090 - 611.316E $2,410.2000 - $3,001.1451 IMP 2237 SR CLERK 7.00 1001 612.569E • S1S.6169 $2,174.5360 • 01,106.565E 3590 2219 PT MST 1.00 103 06.1S00 - $10.9161 OL.071.0000 . 01,637.2080 3590 43.00 6NAiRit C Position mC Salaries by Division Este! 26 AM 1995 Div. Joe Auto Cola COM, Joe Title Ft. Orals Salary Ranges NOacRly Salary ASR2a8 ____ _____ ______________________ ______ _____ _________________________ __________________________ l>10 1000 OIR 09 INGIR$BRIM ..so 19 $39.5272 - $59.1053 $6.610.06B0 - $10.255.7853 1110 2014 COMl1AR ADKIN ..Do a $21.0561 - $32.1232 $3,116.3901 - $5,654.1880 1110 2221 QSCUTIV6 ASST 1 lA0 1012 $16.6310 - $20.7073 $2,802.7067 - $1.599.2651 3110 lase I21T8RR 1.00 as $1.2700 - $16.0000 $1,606.8000 - $2.773.3333 ITlD 6.00 Div. JOU WCL Cots 000e Jo! Title Its Grade Salary Reo$es RmtAly Salary "as ____ _____ ______________________ ______ _____ _________________________ __________________________ 3120 1100 BHOIRSR2R0 FDA 1.00 16 $16.1088 - $40.22" $5,912.1920 - S4.ISS.4453 1720 1110 M11U URIND SPab R 2.00 16 $30.9000 - $63.73U $S.136.0000 - $7,580.7853 2720 2112 IF MIN IR 2.00 13 $29.6718 - $41.1952 $5,108.7920 - $7,225.4361 1120 3116 BMIINBII 6.00 11 $21.7101 - $37.1921 $4,629.0373 - $1,550.0040 1120 1222 9R END ASSOC 2.00 9 $24.2446 - $16.3168 $4,202.1911 - $5.968.2651 1710 I117 AMW ENGINEER III 1.00 8 $23.0561 - $12.1232 $1.911.3107 - $5,154.1960 3720 1221 SR OR ASSOC 1.00 102E $22.1510 - $27.8301 $3,874.1712 - $4,823.1707 1520 122E E26D ASS 2.00 1021 $20.3013 - 529.2712 93,519.8920 - 06.181.2080 1720 3234 M AIM III 2.00 1015 S17.1952 - $21.SBaa $3,006.5013 - $1,162.OSe7 3120 3215 BM. AIDE II 1.00 1009 $i5.1590 - $11.1215 $2,731.5100 - $3,401.0100 1120 2225 SECRETARY 1.00 1007 $14.2611 - $17.7801 $2.476.2513 - $3,093.2707 1720 121E END AIM I 2.00 100E $16.1934 - $17.1145 52,660.1891 - $3,061.8467 1120 2211 SR CR.®R$ 1.00 1002 012.5455 - $15.6148 $1,176.S160 - $2.106.5651 3720 25 00 9 CChibit c POaician am Salaries by Cis slon pate: 14 AVG 1995 Div. Job aueh CoSa Cme Job Title Pro Orate Balsry RM a. Monthly solar, Ra S. ------ ..--- ------------------------- -------------------------- 3730 3110 BNOIN39RIN0 SPy3R 1.00 14 $30.9000 • 843.7353 $6,359.0000 • $7,500.7953 3730 3222 PR BND ASSOC 1.00 9 $24.2441 - $34.3160 $4.202.3172 - $9,146.2453 3730 3224 SMO ASSOC 1.00 1023 $20.3013 - $23.2762 63,519.8120 . $4,341.2000 1730 3234 BNG Arm II 1.00 1009 615.9590 • $19.6215 61,731.5600 - $3,401.0600 3730 2225 SBCRSTART 1.00 1000 $14.2661 - $17.7601 92,479.2573 • 93.OB14)07 3730 3236 SNG AIDB I 1.00 1006 514.1934 . S17.6445 $2,460.1913 . $3,061.8467 3730 6.00 pi, Jab ANch C oa COOa Job Title Pte Orms Salary R9RSe0 Monthly Salmy MMM ..... ..... ...................... ...... ..... ......................... .......................... 3790 3300 CONSTRWIION NGR 1.00 16 $34.1094 • $48.2218 6S.912.1920 SB,359.44S3 3790 3110 SNGINBBRING SWSR 2.00 14 $30.9000 - 643.13S3 $5,356.0000 - S7,SBO.7aS3 3090 3112 SR BNOINSRR 2.00 13 $29.4739 . $41.9652 SS.IOS.7920 $7,325.4347 3790 3114 DOWSER 9.00 11 $21.7101 • $37.7131 $4,429.9373 - $4,530.9040 3790 3310 SPPSR CONSTA INSP 4.06 9 124.2441 - $34.3160 $4,202.3973 - $9.946.2453 3790 3316 SR CORM INSP 6.00 1025 $21.3004 - 626.S225 $3,612.0613 - $4,097.2333 3790 3224 BNG ASSOC 1.00 1023 $20.1013 - $35.2762 63.$19.6920 - $4,381.2060 3790 3319 CONS" IMSP 11.00 1020 $19.4876 - $24.2565 $3,377.9307 - $4,204.4400 3710 3234 5110 AIDS 11I 1.00 lots 817.3452 - 621.5996 $3.004.5013 $3,742.0509 3790 2225 86CRSTARY 1.00 1447 $14.2041 • 617.7001 )2,479.2573 $3,003.2707 3190 2239 SR CLQR 1.00 1003 $12.5454 - SIS.6149 $2,174.5360 62.706.5633 1990 •35.00 •.. 673.00 y JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS MEETING AGENDAFOR OCTOBER 25, 1995 Agenda Item (11)(b)(6): FAHR95-38 Consideration of motion authorizing staff to solicit bids for a professional services agreement for the Financial Information System project for completion of Phase III, Selection Process for Hardware and Software; and Phase IV, Implementation and Acceptance of the Selected Hardware and Software Solutions. Summary At the October 1994 Fiscal Policy Committee meeting, the consulting firm of Deloitte & Touche delivered an extensive Request For Proposal (RFP) for the acquisition and installation of a new financial information system within the Districts' Finance Department. At that time, the Committee had decided to form an ad hoc subcommittee to review the RFP and to report their findings back to the Committee. At the January 18, 1995 meeting, the Finance and Personnel Committee made the decision to have the consulting firm of Ernst & Young review the RFP in conjunction with their review and evaluation of the Finance Department. In their July 1995 report on the Finance Function Review, Ernst & Young recommended a number of enhancements to the RFP including: • Additional functionality requirements in the area of Project Accounting and Cashiering. • Expanded functionality in the Contracts Subsystem area. • Functionality requirements for the Human Resource application. Staff Recommendation 1. Direct staff to solicit bids for a professional consulting agreement for the completion of Phase III, Selection Process for Hardware and Software, and Phase IV, Implementation and Acceptance of the Selected Hardware and Software Solutions for the Financial Information System project 2. Approve for release the Request For Proposal for a Financial Information System. Distribution of the RFP will be made to appropriate vendors as identified by the selected professional consulting firm hired to complete Phases III and IV. JIWPWPBbMOBSOCiBS11B&CM FAHR Committee Recommendation to Executive Committee The Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee recommends the Executive Committee: 1. Direct staff to solicit bids for a professional consulting agreement for the completion of Phase III, Selection Process for Hardware and Software, and Phase IV, Implementation and Acceptance of the Selected Hardware and Software Solutions for the Financial Information System project 2. Approve for release the Request For Proposal for a Financial Information System. Distribution of the RFP will be made to appropriate vendors as identified by the selected professional consulting firm hired to complete Phases III and IV. Executive Committee Recommendation to the Joint Boards of Directors Consideration of motion authorizing staff to solicit bids for a professional services agreement for the Financial Information System project for completion of Phase III, Selection Process for Hardware and Software; and Phase IV, Implementation and Acceptance of the Selected Hardware and Software Solutions. J 1WPOLDBSVGRSWCIBAl1B9.LVR fl October 11, 1995 .. ' bm STAFF REPORT FAHR95-38: Consideration of authorization for staff to solicit bids for Phase III and IV F.I.S. Consultant and Acceptance of F.I.S. RFP prepared by Deloltte &Touche Summary At the October 1994 Fiscal Policy Committee meeting, the consulting firm of Deloitte & Touche delivered an extensive Request For Proposal (RFP)for the acquisition and installation of a new financial information system within the Districts' Finance Department. At that time, the Committee had decided to forth an ad hoc subcommittee to review the RFP and to report their findings back to the Committee. At the January 18, 1995 meeting, the Finance and Personnel Committee made the decision to have the consulting firm of Emst&Young review the RFP in conjunction with their review and evaluation of the Finance Department. In their July 1995 report on the Finance Function Review, Ernst&Young recommended a number of enhancements to the RFP including: • Additional functionality requirements in the area of Project Accounting and Cashiering. • Expanded functionality in the Contracts Subsystem area. • Functionality requirements for the Human Resource application. These additional enhancements have now been incorporated into the RFP by Deloitte & Touche and staff is recommending that the RFP be approved for release. With the approval of the RFP, Deloitte &Touche will have completed Phase I, the Detailed Needs Assessment, and Phase II, Development of Specifications for a Formal RFP, of this F.I.S. project as contractually agreed upon. Staff will be providing this Committee with a recommendation on the selection of a consultant for completing Phase III, Selection Process for Hardware and Software, and Phase IV, Implementation and Acceptance of the Selected Hardware and Software Solutions at the November Finance, Administration, and Human Resource Committee meeting. Background The existing financial information system was designed in 1977 and has been modified when necessary and cost-effective. This system's useful life cycle has expired and the system should be replaced. Factors in support of a new system include limited processing capability of the current computer and disk drives, the unavailability of the source code for CS DOC 0 P.O.Be.8127 0 Faunlein Valley,CA 92728-5127 0 Tel. (714)962.2411 D FAX(714)962-3954 J FAHR95-38 Page 2 October 11, 1995 the proprietary operating system, the lack of corporate support for the operating system, the one-of-a-kind nature of customized software resulting in no support and no enhancements, and the inability of the existing system to grow to accommodate new users and applications. The information needs of the Districts have also changed over the past 15 years as the agency as grown. Flows have grown since 1978 from 191 MGD to 245 MGD, authorized personnel have grown from 276 in 1978 to the current level of 664, and perhaps more significantly, total fixed assets of the Districts, in historical cost, have grown from $229 million in 1978 to over$950 million. Additional information system requirements are further demonstrated by recent studies completed by Ernst&Young and KPMG Peat Marwick. Ernst& Young noted within their July 1995 review of the Districts' Finance Function that no single issue arose more often than the limitations of the financial information system and that the current system lacks key functionality including a report generator, on-line processing, and the ability to establish automated standard journal entries. KPMG Peat Marwick's Internal Control Report dated June 10, 1995 concluded that the Districts would benefit from an integrated financial information system that combined the Human Resource and Payroll functions. Such a system would eliminate duplication and ensure consistency of Human Resource and Payroll information. Their report also mentioned the need for an encumbrance and dynamic job cost accounting system that would allow for increased visibility of budgetary spending, and reduce the possibility of projects exceeding budgets. A summary of the proposed RFP is enclosed and will be reviewed at the meeting. Professional Services The process of acquiring a new financial information system began in February 1994 with a professional consulting agreement with Deloitte &Touche to perform a financial information needs assessment (Phase 1) and for the development of specificabons for a formal request for proposal (Phase 11), for an amount not to exceed $150,000. The RFP presented by Deloitte &Touche represents the completion of their agreed upon work for the Districts. At the outset of the planning for the new F.I.S. proposals were solicited from professional firths to assist in the selection and implementation. The project was established in four phases; Phase I - Perform a Needs Assessment; Phase 11 - Develop Specifications for a Formal RFP; Phase III -Assist with the Application Selection Process; Phase IV-Assist in the Implementation and Acceptance Process. After Committee review and recommendation, the Directors selected the firm of Deloitte&Touche to perform the Phase I and II work. It is appropriate now to consider professional services for the balance of the project. FAHR95-38 ATTACHMENT"A" SUMMARY REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR A FINANCIAL INFORMATION SYSTEM vervie This is a major systems development project to upgrade the core business management information system. The three major functional or application areas that are required to be fully integrated consist of the following components: • Finance: General Ledger Cost Accounting Budget Accounts Receivable Cash Receipts Fixed Assets • Materials Management: Accounts Payable Inventory Control Procurement • Payroll/Human Resources Payroll Process Human Resources Information Additionally, there are hardware and technical system requirements that must be met. In both the hardware and applications areas, the goal of the RFP is to obtain mainstream solutions which will best fulfill our requirements for the next several years. The RFP has been prepared in five chapters which are summarized in the following: General Information This chapter explains in general terms who we are, what we are looking for, and the selection process. Included in this section is information the proposer will need and matrix forms to be completed for one-time and ongoing software-related costs, training classes and associated costs and for any modifications or customization required. Copies of these forms are attached. v Attachment "A" FAHR95-38 d Page 2 Vendor and Product Profile Requirements This chapter requires the proposer to answer a multitude of questions about the firm, including the firm's previous installations, the firm's customer support and training capabilities, their implementation support, their ongoing development practices and policies, and their application version control system. Technical Requirements The configuration of the hardware environment will be determined by the software and have not been predetermined. This section requires the proposers to identify the hardware configurations that the proposed software runs on, the computer resources required, the operating systems required, technology integration features, the future directions of enhancements and technology and other system-related data. Proposers are advised that we will give preference to Oracle based applications with a Windows- NT interface. Global System Requirements This is the section of the RFP that addresses issues common to all of the applications being proposed. These include issues like archiving, support for multiple organizations, date and time considerations, tables and table maintenance, input validation, error handling controls, reporting, function security, documentation and audit trails. Aoolication Area Functional Requirements This section is really three sections, one each for the requirements for Finance, Materials Management and Payroll/Human Resources, and is over 200 pages long. Finance The General Ledger will be closely integrated with other financial systems, provide validation for all transaction entries, serve as a central repository for all financial transaction data, and meet the following objectives: • All data maintained on accounts is accurate and timely. • Provide flexibility to meet changing needs. • Meet all statutory and GAAP fund accounting requirements. • Provide effective controls and support of audit procedures. • Allow local data entry and ad hoc reporting. • Support budget vs. actual reporting, including encumbrances. • Support modified accrual accounting. • Provide on-line inquiry capabilities. Attachment "A" FAHR95-38 Page 3 The Cost Accounting module will support fund accounting and encumbrances, and be updated from the same transactions that update the General Ledger, Accounts Payable and Purchasing and will meet the following objectives: • Retain cost data at user-defined levels. • Retain cost data by project across fiscal or calendar years. • Retrieve data on-line or in reports at transaction and summary levels. • Access data on-line by combinations of project and/or activity codes. • Support cost allocations per user-defined parameters. • Use tables and algorithms for cost allocation. • Support cost analysis at several levels. The Budgeting system will enhance staffs ability to collect, process, analyze and distribute budget data and documentation required to monitor revenues and expenditures. The system will track each line item as it moves through the budget process, support a multi-level approval process and tie into the review and appropriation processes of the Board of Directors. The objectives of this application include: • Preparation of Division budgets through on-line worksheets and approvals. • Roll up of lower level budgets. • Outloading information to word processing/graphical systems for final reports. • Control and tracking of budget adjustments. • Monitoring from various levels. • Support ongoing monitoring of amendments after adoption. • Provide different views of the consolidated budget. The Accounts Receivable/Cash Receipts application will provide on-line entry of transactions, editing upon data entry and on-line inquiry, and report generation. The system will automatically match invoices and payments and support the recording of customer conversations and correspondence. The objectives of the subsystem include: • Increase productivity and reduce errors through matching and reporting variances. • Interface with Accounts Payable for refunds and adjustments. • Capture and retain historical information. • Support ad hoc reporting for specific problems. • Provide electronic interface with Technical Services to enhance industrial/commercial user invoices. The Fixed Asset subsystem will facilitate tracking of fixed assets and other tagged portable assets through the following objectives: • Automatically generate tags for increased productivity. • Attachment "A" FAHR95-38 u Page 4 • Support ad hoc reporting for specific problems. • Eliminate redundant data entry through interfaces with other applications. Materials Management The Accounts Payable application will be on-line, real time, tightly integrated with Purchasing and Inventory Receiving and will provide data entry edits. The major objectives of this module include: • Automatic three-way matching. • Acceptance of data from Accounts Receivable. • Communication of pending items to other modules. • Capture of historical vendor information. • Support of ad hoc report generation. • On-line processing. • Validation of general ledger entries. • Automatic preparation of 1099s. • Built-in controls to prevent duplicate invoice entry. The Inventory Control application will function in a multi-warehouse environment, providing automated stock level calculations and automatic replenishment through the creation of transfers or purchase orders. The system will be fully integrated with Purchasing and will pass inventory transactions to the General Ledger. Following are the overall objectives of this system: • On-line update and inquiry. • Complete integration with Purchasing. • Improved inventory management. • Identification of obsolete inventory. • Support of hazardous materials management. • Support of paperless receiving. • Automatic purchase orders. The Purchasing module will be an on-line, real-time application tightly integrated with Accounts Payable, Inventory Control and the General Ledger in order to maximize data integrity, reduce redundant data entry, and enable better use of information. The major objectives of this module include: • Decrease purchase requisition cycle time. • On-line purchase order entry from requisition. • Consolidation of requisition by vendor. • Qualitative and quantitative vendor ratings. • Purchasing history for all items purchased. • Support ad hoc report generation. • Seamless interface with RJN Computerized Maintenance Management System. b Attachment "A" FAHR95-38 Page 5 Payroll/Human Resources The Payroll application will include timekeeping and calculating and distributing payroll costs. The subsystem will obtain data from the Human Resources application seamlessly, prepare checks and maintain year-to-date totals. Among the many management and accounting objectives of the Payroll system are: • Provide a single point of entry for all payroll hours, work order numbers and leave hours. • Establish platform for potential move to decentralized time/attendance entry. • Maintain work-hour year-to-date totals for individuals and work units. • Provide direct deposit option. • Provide on-line review of employee work/leave hours, salary and deduction information. • Provide seamless integration with Human Resources, General Ledger, Cost Accounting and Budget modules. The Human Resources subsystem will include employee processing, classificetion/compensation, performance appraisals, career planning, succession planning, benefit management, and training and development. The system will be fully integrated with the General Ledger, Payroll and Budget applications. Among the objectives of this system are: • Seamless integration with other systems. • A single point of input for salary and benefit information. • A training inventory by employee. • Automated classification studies. • Remote on-line inquiry of employee benefits. • Integration of position control with Budgeting. The RFP has been prepared by Deloitte & Touche after their completion of needs assessment, has been reviewed by appropriate Districts' staff at various levels, has been reviewed by Ernst & Young for conformance with their recommendations, and is now ready to issue. The successful proposer will provide for benchmarking, performance measurement and project management throughout the proposal. GGS:Ic J%WGWLlI=MN2FFC.M AHR BSISTA RP1UlTA W Attachments JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS MEETING AGENDA FOR OCTOBER 25, 1995 Agenda Item (11 )(b)(7): FAHR95-40 Consideration of motion authorizing staff to negotiate Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, and 13 and County Sanitation District No. 14 for Purchase and Sale of Capacity Rights in Treatment, Disposal and Sewer Facilities, providing for District No. 14's annual flow to be based upon actual average flow per day for the four highest months, and providing capacity for higher winter-month flows. Summary In September 1995, the staff presented an information report to the Executive Committee regarding the status of the IRWD negotiations. In the meantime, staff learned of the IRWD Wetland Water Supply Project through reports in the newspaper. A review of the EIR for the Project indicates that, if approved, the IRWD will discharge an average of 5 mgd to the duck ponds (and eventually into Upper Newport Bay) from October 21 through March 31. The flow diversion could begin as early as January 1996, if the Regional Water Quality Control Board approves the plan at their December meeting. Removal of this flow from the CSD system will have a significant impact on each of the Districts. This report is intended to update the September 1995 report to show the financial implications to the Districts if the IRWD winter flows are significantly decreased. Because it is uncertain whether the Wetland Water Supply Project will be approved, this report includes financial data based upon historic flows as well as the financial impacts of the 5 mgd diversion to the Upper Newport Bay via the duck ponds. Staff Recommendation Although the financial impact is different if the Wetlands Project is approved, the policy issue remains the same: IRWD should not be expected to pay 15 mgd if they are sending significantly less flow. Therefore, staff recommends the FAHR Committee affirm the Executive Committee's direction to negotiate a change to the 1986 "Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Capacity Rights in Treatment, Disposal and Sewer Facilities" so that the District No. 14 annual flow is based upon the actual average flow per day for the four highest months, providing capacity for higher winter month flows. b FAHR Committee Recommendation to Executive Committee v The Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee recommends that the Executive Committee recommend to the Joint Boards that that the Districts negotiate a change to the 1986 "Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Capacity Rights in Treatment, Disposal and Sewer Facilities" so that the District No. 14 annual flow is based upon the actual average flow per day for the four highest months, providing capacity for higher winter month flows. Executive Committee Recommendation to the Joint Boards of Directors The Executive Committee concurs with the recommendation of the FAHR Committee. J1W PW PBSAGYvW CIBSIIB'I.CVR n September20, 1995 Revised 9127195 STAFF REPORT FAHR95.40: Consideration of motion to change the "Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Capacity Rights in Treatment, Disposal and Sewer Facilities" between County Sanitation District No. 14 and the other County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Summary In September 1995, the staff presented an information report to the Executive Committee regarding the status of the IRWD negotiations. Subsequently, staff learned of the IRWD Wetland Water Supply Project through reports in the newspaper. A review of the EIR for the Project indicates that, if approved, the IRWD will discharge an average of 5 mgd to the duck ponds (and eventually into Upper Newport Bay)from October 21 through March 31. The flow diversion could begin as early as January 1996, if the Regional Water Quality Control Board approves the plan at their December meeting. Removal of this flow from the CSD system will have a significant impact on each of the Districts. This report is intended to update the September 1995 report to show the financial implications to the Districts if the IRWD winter flows are significantly decreased. Because it is uncertain whether the Wetland Water Supply Project will be approved, this report includes financial data based upon historic flows as well as the financial impacts of the 5 mgd diversion to the Upper Newport Bay via the duck ponds. Background The 1986 Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Capacity Rights was a result of the formation of District No. 14. The Agreement allows a change in the method of calculating the District No. 14 share of capacity in the joint works treatment facilities after 1994-95, if agreeable to both parties. Current policy provides for an "equity percentage" and amount to be calculated each year for each Districts' percentage ownership in the combined joint works treatment facilities including the interplant and ocean outfall facilities. The books and accounts are adjusted and funds are transferred from the buying to the selling Districts. With the exception of District No. 14, the equity percentage calculations are based upon the actual total annual flows for the preceding three fiscal years. The original agreement specified a District No. 14 flow of 15 million gallons per day. A specified flow was used because all of the District No. 14 flow passed through the Irvine Ranch Water District treatment and reclamation plant. Some of this flow can be diverted for agricultural uses in the summer, reducing the annual flow to our plants, but capacity is required for the higher winter months' flow. CSDDC 0 P.O.Box 8127 D Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 0 Tel. (714)992-2411 0 FAX(714)982-3954 FAHR95-40 Page 2 September 20, 1995 .. Revised 9/27/95 The Irvine Ranch Water District, which funds all of the District No. 14 financial requirements, has asked for the 15 mgd minimum to be reconsidered. Staffs of both agencies have met several times and have agreed that a change is appropriate largely because the monthly flow has never reached a 15 mgd average, has exceeded a 10 mgd average only 8 times in the last 3 years, and the average daily flows have been 6.3 mgd. Although the annual equity adjustment and subsequent Capital Outlay Revolving Fund (CORF) budget contributions are based upon total annual flow for the other Districts, the flow for District No. 14 is based upon 15 mgd calculation. A calculation is required because the IRWD diverts flow for irrigation in the summer months. Since CSD treatment plant capacity must be based upon the maximum flow that can be reasonably expected, the very low summer flows in District No. 14 distort their fair share. As an example, the percentage change in flows for 1994-95 from the average to the highest month for District No. 14 was 244%, while the change for the other Districts was only 7%. One of the other distinctions of the District No. 14 special relationship with the IRWD relates to the CSD Reserve Policy. All of the funding needs of the District are met by IRWD when the needs arise and most of the reserve funds have been kept and invested by IRWD. This arrangement has caused District No. 14 not to participate fully in the CSD Reserve Policy for long-term capital needs and for potential earthquake, flood damage and liability claims reserves. Staff of both agencies recognize all these differences as well as the needs to be fair and equitable and to pay for facilities based upon use. After evaluating and discussing several alternatives, the following working proposal was developed: • The annual flow for District No. 14 will be calculated by multiplying the actual flow for the highest four months by three to determine a twelve-month flow, beginning with 1995-96. • Proceeds from the resultant incremental sale of District No. 14s share of joint works capital facilities to the other Districts will remain in the District No. 14 accounts and will be used first to satisfy reserve policy requirements, with any excess used to fund future District funding requirements. • Interest earnings on reserve funds will be allocated to District No. 14. Current Situation Had this proposed flow determination been in effect for the past three fiscal years, the District No. 14 share of joint works capital facilities would be 4.58% rather than 6.31% calculated on a three-year average flow. Starting to use this method for 1995-96 will provide for a three-year phase-in of the lower equity share for District No. 14 and higher shares for the other Districts. The one-time cost to the CSD of the change, based upon FAHR95-40 Page 3 September 20, 1995 Revised 9127/95 June 30, 1995 balances, would be $12,062,000. Using the 1995-96 CORF budget as a reference, the ten-year additional joint works capital improvement costs to the other CSDs would be $9.514,000. Implications of the Wetland Water Supply Proiect If the IRWD can consistently divert 5 mgd during the winter months, then the future capacity requirements for the CSD treatment plants could be reduced. Such a reduction would reduce future capital improvement costs and contributions from each District. However, if the flows are not consistently diverted and are sent to our treatment plants, then capacity for both average and peak flows must be provided. The costs for this additional capacity are shared by the CSD, based upon their flow-based equity percentages. The schedule and graphs presented to the Executive Committee have been redone (attached) to show the potential financial impact on the other CSDs if the IRWD Welland Water Supply Project is approved. Had the Project and the working proposal been in effect for the past three fiscal years, the District No. 14 share of joint works capital facilities would be 2.90% rather than the 4.58% or the 6.31% currently calculated on a three-year average flow. The one-time cost to the CSD of the change, based upon June 30, 1995 balances, would be $23,822,000. Using the 1995-96 CORF budget as a reference, the ten-year additional joint works capital improvement costs to the other CSDs would be $18,799,000, rather than the $9,514,000 which was calculated before the Project. Enclosed with this report is a copy of the original tentative working proposal developed by staff. This working proposal includes historical flow charts for District No. 14 and for the other eight Districts, showing the range of average daily flows per month. Also enclosed are schedules showing the difference in future annual joint works capital contributions and the June 30, 1995 equity sale and purchase, assuming the flow calculation alternative had been in effect for the past three years with and without the IRWD Wetland Water Supply Project. All of the calculations in this report and the attachments are based upon historical information. The actual flows going forward will be different and will result in different allocations of CORF improvement costs each year and in different JWTF equity purchases and sales. Should the flows in the District No. 14 service area increase at a faster rate than those in the other Districts, then District No. 14 would be required to buy back some of the JWTF equity and to contribute a higher percentage to annual CORF improvement projects. The assumptions have been kept simple in this presentation in order not to introduce error and to concentrate on the issue of payments based upon use. FAHR95-40 Page 4 September 20, 1995 Revised 9/27/95 Recommendation Although the financial impact is different if the Wetlands Project is approved, the policy issue remains the same: IRWD should not be expected to pay 15 mgd 'If they are sending significantly less flow. Therefore, staff recommends the FAHR Committee affirm the Executive Committee's direction to negotiate a change to the 1986 "Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Capacity Rights in Treatment, Disposal and Sewer Facilities" so that the District No. 14 annual flow is based upon the actual average flow per day for the four highest months, providing capacity for higher winter month flows. GGS:lc J:W PDOCIFINICRANETFPC.MTGFAHR.QSlSTAFF.RPMRFAHR95.A0 Attachments August 31, 1995 MEMORANDUM TO: Distribution FROM: Gary Streed� SUBJECT: IRWD 15 mgd CORF Contribution Baseline Proposal 1. The Boards of Directors of the individual Districts will have to approve any revision to the existing agreement 2. Use actual flow for 4 highest flow months times 3 to determine the District 14 flow for annual equity adjustments and annual share of Joint Works construction requirements (CORF) rather than a fixed 15 mgd. Rain affects all Districts and the equity percentages are a percent to total calculation, so rain days can be ignored. Allowance for an increased use of the system by all users is already included by using a 4 month average rather than the single high month. 3. If above used to determine the 1994-95 District 14 flow, the 6/30/95 equity percentage would have been 4.58% rather than the 6.31% based on 15 mgd. 4. If 2 and 3, then the 6/30/95 Joint Works equity adjustment for District 14 would be a sale of approximately $12,950,000 rather than the $888,000 sale booked. 5. If 4, then the other Districts would be required to transfer an additional $12,062,000 to District 14. Districts' 1, 2 & 3 shares would total $8,978,000. 6. Over the next 10 years the other Districts would need to make additional CORF contributions of$9,514,000 to replace the reduced annual CORF contributions from District 14, based on the 95-96 budget 7. District 14 does not currently comply with the entire reserve policy of the other Districts. The $12,950,000 above should be retained within the District to meet these requirements. Page 2 8. Reserve Policy Summary Actual 6/95 Per Policy Operating dry period reserve @ 50% 866,000 1,066,000 Operating contingency @ 20% 0 426,000 Operating share of insurance 0 0 Capital reserve (share of$50,000,000) 1.982,000 3,155,000 Environmental (share of$5,000,000) 0 316,000 Capital share of insurance@ $150,000,000 0 9,465,000 Total 2,976,000 14,428,000 9. District 14 has a Reserve Policy deficiency at 6130/95 of$11,452,000 based on above. 10. Interest earnings will be credited and will remain in District 14, reducing future IRWD contributions. 11. All above estimates are for discussion and are calculated as if the change from 15 mgd had been effective for 1992-93, 1993-94 and 1994-95. Cash transfers required will be phased beginning with the 6/30/96 equity adjustment in which only one year's flow will be based upon the changed flow assumptions. Distribution: Donald F. McIntyre Judith Wilson Blake Anderson Ron Young Ron Zenk Gregory P. Heiertz Kathryn Beseau GGS/ CDFLICF W O VIIMTEMP�ATEW EM W q W D.&t1 1015/95 MONTH TO MONTH FLOW TRENDS 35.00 - - ----- ----- - _ ___ _____ __ _______ . . _ _____ __ _._________ .___________ _____ 25.00 - --- --- . . . . . - ----- -- _--- -- - __ _ --- _ _ _ _--- -_ ----------------- 20.00 _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ --- --- - _ - - - -- __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ _ ___ _ _ G' J_ 0 15.00 __ __ _ _ . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . ._ _ _. _ _ _ . - ------- - _ --- . . _ __ -- ----- ---------_ __________________ ____ __ _ 4 10.00 _ _______ _ _ _ _ ___ __ _ _________ - - __ .____. __________ -_ . 5.00 ____ _ _ -- - _ _ -- --- - --- - - - - -- _ _-------. - ------ --- - - - -- - ----- ------ --- ------ -- ---------------- _ . . . 0.00 g a y y p a y am m p n n n n 0 OI W � OI 11�1 gg ' O z o i o Dist 14 Total MGD f Other 8 Dist IRWC_FLW.XLS,CHART 3 7:17 AM 10/S195 Estimated Cost to Change District 14 Annual CORF Contribution From 15MGD to Hlnhast 4 Months IRWD CONTRIBUTION Vr Ended 15 MGD Hi 4 Month Cost to CSD No 6/30 Equity% 94-95% Other Diets 1 2 3 5 6 7 11 13 Total 1996 2,116,000 1,536,000 580.000 60,845 182,291 188,552 22,308 29,055 51,909 39,084 5,957 580,000 1997 4,737,000 3,443,000 1,294,000 135.747 408,697 420,665 49,769 64,822 116.812 87,198 13,290 1.294.000 1998 4,713,000 3.426.000 1.287,000 135,012 404,497 418,390 49,500 64,471 115.185 86,726 13,218 1,287,000 1999 3,775,000 2.745,000 1.030,000 108.052 323,724 334.842 39,615 51,597 92.184 89,408 10,578 1.030.000 2000 2,302,000 1,674,000 628.000 65,880 197,377 204,156 24,154 31,459 56,205 42,319 6,450 628,000 2001 3,437,000 2,498,000 939.000 98,505 295.123 305,259 36.115 47,039 84,040 63,276 9,644 939,000 2002 3,437,000 2,498,000 939,000 98,505 295,123 305,259 36,115 47,039 84.040 63,276 9,644 939,000 2003 3,437,000 2,498.000 939.000 98,505 295.123 305,259 36,115 47,039 84,040 63.276 9,644 939,000 2004 3,437,000 2,498,000 939,000 96,505 295,123 305,259 36,115 47,039 84,040 63,276 9,644 939,000 2005 3,437,000 2,498,000 939,000 98,505 295.123 305.259 36,115 47,039 84,040 63,276 9,644 939,000 Total 34,828,000 25,314,000 9,514,000 998,063 2,990,200 3,092,898 365.923 476,597 851,494 641,113 97,712 9,514,000 Dist Equity 10.01% 29.99% 31.02% 3.67% 4.78% 8.54% 6.43% 0.98% 95.42% Dist%to Total 10.49% 31.43% 32.51% 3.85% 5,01% 8,95% 6.74% 1.03% 100.00% One Time Equity Adjust 1995 (888,000) (12,950,000) 12,062,000 1,265,360 3.791.023 3,921.224 463,923 604,238 1,079,538 812,813 123.881 12,062,000 IRWD FL4.XLS 7:20 AM 1015/95 MONTH TO MONTH FLOW TRENDS 5 mgd Deducted From IRWD Flows November Thru March 35.00 30,00 - - -- -— - . - - - ' --- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - -- -- - - -- -- -" 25.00 - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - -- - - - - - -- -- - -- -- - --- - N J LL J_ F g 10.00 - - ------ -- --- - - -- ------ ---- - - - - - -- -- ---------- --- - -----------------------------—------------- 5.00 --- --- - -- - - -- -- --- ------- ---- - - - - -------- ---------- -- 0.00 y C p 4 y y p p yy a N N N VI Ol 17 Il 17 M1 !1 � 0 T P P P W Oi W O� T d W ONI N W W 9 0 a 0 41 0 ' 0 T y Jz � o O N ' d 0 W a yr 0 Z o LL g $ f a� g z o LL f $ -, a m D z 0 t Dist 14 Total MGD Other 8 Dist Ave IRWD_FLW.XLS,CHART 3 7:16 AM 1a5re5 Estimated Cost to Change District 14 Annual CORF Contribution From 15MGD to Highest 4 Months IRWD Flows Redueed for 5 mad to Creek From Nov Thou March IRWD CONTRIBUTION Yr Ended 15 MOD Net Hi 4 Month Cost to CSD No 8/30 Equity% 94-95% Other Dish; 1 2 3 5 6 7 11 13 Total 1998 2,118,000 972.000 1,144,000 120,055 359,341 371,829 44,063 57,259 102.501 77,170 11.782 1.144,000 1997 4,737,000 2,180,000 2.557.000 268.340 803,177 831,091 98,488 127,982 229,103 172,488 26.334 2.557.000 1998 4,713,DOD 2.169,000 2,544,000 266,976 799.094 826,865 97,987 127.331 227,938 171,009 26.200 2,544,000 1999 3,775.000 1.738.000 2,037,000 213,770 639.840 662,077 78,459 101,955 182,612 137,408 20,978 2,037,000 2000 2,302,000 1,060.000 1,242,000 130,340 390.124 403.682 47,838 82,164 111,281 83,781 12,791 1,242.000 2001 3,437,D00 1,582.000 1,855,000 194,670 582.673 602.923 71,449 92,846 166,206 125,131 19,104 1,855,000 2002 3,437,000 1,582,000 1,865.000 194,670 582.673 602.923 71,449 92.846 166,205 125,131 19,104 1,855.000 2003 3,437,000 1,582,000 1,855.000 194,670 682.673 602,923 71,449 92,846 166,205 125,131 19,104 1,855.000 2004 3,437,000 1,582,000 1,855,000 194,670 582,673 602.923 71.449 92.846 166,205 125,131 19,104 1.855.000 2005 3,437,000 1,582,000 1,855.000 194,670 582,673 602,923 71,449 92,846 166.205 125,131 19,104 1,855,000 Total 34.828,000 16.029,OD0 18,799,OD0 1,972,830 5,904,938 6,110,159 724,081 940,918 1,684,359 1,268,110 193,605 18,799,000 Dist Equity 10.19% 30.50% 31.56% 3.74% 4,86% 8.70% 6.55% 1.00% 97.10% Dist%to Total 10.49% 31,41% 32.50% 3.85% 5.01% 8.96% 6,75% 1,03% 100,00% One Time Equity Adjust 1995 (888,000) (24,710,000) 23,822.000 2,499,961 7.482,709 7.742.763 917,552 1.192.327 2,134,412 1,606,942 245,335 23,822,000 IRWD FLB.XLS 7:20 AM AMENDMENT NO. 42 TO AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE AND SALE OF CAPACITY RIGHTS IN TREATMENT, DISPOSAL AND SEWER FACILITIES THIS AMENDMENT NO. 42 is made and entered into, to be effective this day of , 1995, by and between: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 AND 13 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, hereinafter collectively referred to as "CSDOC'; AND COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, hereinafter referred to as 14". RECITALS WHEREAS, CSDOC and 14 have entered into an agreement entitled AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE AND SALE OF CAPACITY RIGHTS IN TREATMENT, DISPOSAL AND SEWER FACILITIES, dated as of FebFuaFy '", 1907 `,(the "Agreement") providing, among other things, for the acquisition by 14 from CSDOC of capacity in the JWTF (capitalized terms used herein shall have the definitions given them in the Agreement), modification of such capacity pursuant to the Annual Integration Adjustment based upon actual utilization by 14 above CS llND;and computation bf 14's share of the annual CORF budget; and WHEREAS, Section 5C of the Agreement contemplated that after fiscal year 1994-95, if 14's annual flow did not exceed 5475 MG/year{15 hTGD , 14's CORF budget share might be changed by mutual agreement; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 5C, the parties wish to make certain changes in the method for calculating 14's annual CORF budget share along with corresponding changes in the method for calculating 14's Annual Integration Adjustment, in order to make such calculations M,consistent with the method utilized by CSDOC for all of its other Districts; and WHEREAS, the parties wish to make provision for 14's compliance with CSDOC's reserve policy. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises set forth herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: Section 1: Annual Integration Adjustment. Commencing with the annual integration adjustment made on June 30, 1996, the annual integration adjustment of 14's equity share in the JWTF and real property will be made as provided in Section 4 of the Agreement, but the annual integration adjustment will be based upon 14's CORF budget percentage computed in accordance with the revised method provided in this Amendment. This Amendment is not intended to modify the criteria for the inclusion of the value of real property in the annual integration adjustment, as set forth in Section 4A of the Agreement. Section 2: Budget Share. Section 5C of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows: "C. CORF Share After 1994-95. After fiscal year 1994-95, 14's share of the CORF shall be that percentage of the entire annual CORF budget derived by multiplying 14's actual flow for the four eenseedtive calendar 2aoo 14 1sz 2 �i month§peeled of the preceding fiscal year having the highest flow fwsiFlg aYeFag9 Daily IDFy WeatheF Flow fGF 8Ry Fain days) by three, averaging the result thereof with the result of the same calculation for the preceding two fiscal years, and dividing the resulting three-year average ("() by the sum of the combined total average flow of all other Districts for the preceding three fiscal years plus 'T', provided, that a flow of 5475 MG [57NRQ) as specified in Subsection 'A' above shall be used for each of fiscal years 1993-94 and 1994-95 in computing 14's three-year averages which include those years. Except as so provided herein with respect to the use of said 1993-94 and 1994-95 fiscal years in subsequent three-year averages as applicable, Subsections 'A' and 'B' shall not apply after fiscal year 1994-95." [INSERT OR ATTACH EXAMPLE OF ABOVE CALCULATION] Section 3: Periodic Review of CORF Share. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 5C of the Agreement as amended herein, the parties hereto agree, on the request of either party, to periodically review in good faith the appropriateness of 14's CORF budget share under the circumstances then existing. A party may make such a request following the third anniversary of this Amendment and at three-year intervals thereafter. Section 4: Credits to Reduce Contributions. Annual Integration Adjustment payments shall not be refunded or paid to 14 but shall be held as a credit for the account of 14 in the books and records of CSDOC, which credit shall accrue interest at 20 14 3 193W 1 return]setua ear "t1 �nn��nvstmeetss, ancaiCiroiedD;tt3 1rNe's @kite The credited amounts shall be applied first, to satisfy any reserve share requirements under Section 5 hereof and second, to satisfy future contributions required to be made by 14. Section 5: Reserve Requirement. It is acknowledged that the CSDOC reserves held with respect to 14 are not presently on a basis consistent with the reserves for the other Districts. The parties agree that 14's reserves shall hereafter be computed in a manner;, e consistent with the method approved by the CSDOC Boards of Directors to be utilized for all other Districts' reserves. 14 shall contribute to the reserve by means of a credit of its Annual Integration Adjustment payments to such reserve until 14's reserve share is funded to an amount consistent with the reserve shares of the other Districts. Except for the application of such credited amounts, 14 shall not be charged any amounts or required to make any contributions to fund such reservesp(1' 1 ,« n¢(Tar eCe, ,e"Go` `"tteXtsts"tnLst@n � W, . Section 6: Agreement to Remain in Force. This Agreement, as amended hereby, shall remain in full force and effect. SW0.00014 4 19283_1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed in duplicate in the names of the respective Districts by their duly authorized officers, effective as of the day and year first above written. "CSDOC" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA By Chairman, Board of Directors By Secretary, Board of Directors COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA By Chairman, Board of Directors By Secretary, Board of Directors COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA By Chairman, Board of Directors By Secretary, Board of Directors COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA By Chairman, Board of Directors By Secretary, Board of Directors moo- 14 5 MW 1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA By Chairman, Board of Directors By Secretary, Board of Directors COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA By Chairman, Board of Directors By Secretary, Board of Directors COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA By Chairman, Board of Directors By Secretary, Board of Directors COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 13 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA By Chairman, Board of Directors By Secretary, Board of Directors zaao 14 6 . is3 t "14" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA By Chairman, Board of Directors By Secretary, Board of Directors APPROVED AS TO FORM: THOMAS L. WOODRUFF, DISTRICT COUNSEL By TCAp1P.l Wl=5) ]OODD0014 lRaq 1 .y i JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS r MEETING AGENDA FOR OCTOBER 25, 1995 Agenda Item (11 )(b)(8): FAHR95-41 Consideration of motion to receive and file monthly investment report and staff report regarding performance monitoring of Pacific Investment Management Company (PIMCO) Summary The purpose of this report is to provide the Finance, Administration & Human Resources Committee with status information about the Districts' investment management program, and the performance monitoring of the Districts' external investment manager, Pacific Investment Management Company(PIMCO). Staff Recommendation This is the initial monthly report of the investment activity since funds were transferred to PIMCO. While it is inappropriate to compare PIMCO to the benchmarks in the first month, the report is necessary to comply with our Investment Policy. Staff recommends the report be received and fled. FAHR Committee Recommendation to Executive Committee The FAHR Committee recommends receiving and filing the report and the supplemental information provided at the meeting. Executive Committee Recommendation to the Joint Boards of Directors The Executive Committee concurs with the recommendation of the FAHR Committee. J I W TT�1�'UG6510C1�11 BB.CYR ti I Cp October 11, 1995 STAFF REPORT FAHR95-41: Performance Monitoring of Pacific Investment Management Company Backoround As reported at the last Committee meeting, $293.1 million in maturing Treasury Bill proceeds was deposited on September 7, 1995, with the Districts' safekeeping bank, Mellon Trust, for initial funding of the Districts' external investment management program, to be managed by PIMCO, the Districts' investment manager. The short-term portfolio received $60 million, and the long-term portfolio was funded with $233.1 million. Portfolio Structuring During the month of September, PIMCO has completed approximately 75 transactions, purchasing and selling securities to properly structure the Districts' two investment portfolios in accordance with the Districts' Investment Policy Statement. Monitoring & Reporting - Monthly Reports Also during the month, staff has toured the PIMCO facilities and trading desk, and met with the Districts' Account Managers at PIMCO to review ongoing performance monitoring and reporting requirements. The attached sample Monthly Report is a customized product for the Districts. Monthly Reports will be available from PIMCO to the Districts after the fifth business day following the end of the preceding month. Given the timing of agenda mailing dates for Committee meetings, and availability of the PIMCO Monthly Reports occurring after the mailing dates, the Monthly Reports will be distributed at Committee meetings. A Monthly Report for the partial month of September will be prepared and submitted to the Committee. Please note that since September has been a structuring period for PIMCO, the Districts' Investment Advisor, Callan Associates, has recommended that actual performance evaluation of the portfolios and the investment manager should begin on October 1, 1995. CSDOC 0 P.O.Box S127 0 FeunW1n valley,CA 52T2"127 0 Tel. (714)582-2tl 1 0 FAX(71q 552-555< a FAHR95-41 Page 2 October 11, 1995 Monthly Bank Statements from Mellon Trust, detailing portfolio transactions and account balances, will also be available to the Districts for review by the Committee on the same schedule as above. The value of the Districts' portfolios will be "marked to market" (converted to current value) at the end of each month. Staff is investigating the on-line reporting services available from Mellon Trust with the goal of implementing an on-line system to enhance the Districts' investment monitoring and reporting capabilities. Monthly reports from both PIMCO and Mellon Trust will be forwarded to Callan for their ongoing performance review and reporting responsibilities to the Districts. Monitoring& Reporting - Quarterly Reports Callan will prepare and present to the Committee a Quarterly Performance Report which will evaluate portfolio performance and the performance of the investment manager, using the duration and benchmark measures previously approved by the Committee for this purpose. The duration for the short-term and long-tens portfolios is 90 days and 2.5 years, respectively. There are two benchmarks for each portfolio. The first is a Market Index Benchmark which reflects the rateof-retum for investments with similar maturities. The second is a Peer Group Benchmark which reflects the returns achieved by other active money managers with similar investment objectives. The benchmarks are summarized as follows: Liquid Operating Monies • The three-month T-Bill rate will be the Market Index Benchmark for the short-term operating fund. • The Callan Active Cash Fixed-Income Style Group will be the Peer Group Benchmark for the short-term operating fund. Long-Term Operating Monies • The Merrill Lynch Government and Corporate one to five-year Maturity Index will be the Market Index Benchmark for the long-term fund. FAHR95-41 Page 3 October 11, 1995 • The Callan Defensive Fixed-Income Style Group will be the Peer Group Benchmark for the long-term fund. Staff will continue to develop and enhance the monitoring and reporting systems for the Districts' investment management program, and will keep the Committee fully informed on new developments. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that this report be received and filed. JAWFOO4+FIMLIWhIFFCM GTMRA TWF.WMRFMM.41 MONTHLY REPORT COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ending September 30, 1995) Liquid Operating Monies 14.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value: $ Historical Cost: $ 14.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: Of Index: 14.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact (gain/loss) of 1% Change: $ 14.1.4 REVERSE REPOS % of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: (see attached schedule) 14.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY % of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 14.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: 14.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING % of Portfolio Below "A": 14.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" 14.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Portfolio Total Rate of Return: 1 Month: 3 Months: 12 Months: Year-to-Date: Index Total Rate of Rehm: 1 Month: MONTHLY REPORT COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ending September 30, 1995) Long Term Operating Monies 14.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value: $ Historical Cost: $ 14.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: Of Index: 14.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact (gain/loss) of 1% Change: $ 14.1.4 REVERSE REPOS % of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: (see attached schedule) 14.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY Not Required for this Portfolio 14.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: 14.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING % of Portfolio Below "A": 14.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" 14.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Portfolio Total Rate of Return: 1 Month: 3 Months: 12 Months: Year-to-Date: Index Total Rate of Return: 1 Month: QUARTERLY REPORT COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the quarter ending September 30, 1995) Liquid Operating Monies 14.1.1 1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value: $ Historical Cost: $ 14.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: Of Index: 14.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact (gain/loss) of 1% Change: $ 14.1.4 REVERSE REPOS % of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: (see attached schedule) 14.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY % of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 14.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: 14.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING % of Portfolio Below "A": 14.1.5 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" 14.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Portfolio Total Rate of Return: 1 Month: 3 Months: 12 Months: Year-to-Date: Index Total Rate of Return: 1 Month: QUARTERLY REPORT COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the quarter ending September 30, 1995) Long Term Operating Monies 14.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value: $ Historical Cost: $ 14.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: Of Index: 14.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact (gain/loss) of 1% Change: $ 14.1.4 REVERSE REPOS % of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: (see attached schedule) 14.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY Not Required for this Portfolio 14.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: 14.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING % of Portfolio Below "A": 14.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" 14.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Portfolio Total Rate of Return: 1 Month: 3 Months: 12 Months: Year-to-Date: Index Total Rate of Return: 1 Month: PROGRAM NAME: P10022 T R A N S A C T I O N J 0 U R N A L PAGE: 7 RUN DATE: 10/04/95 8131195 TNRU 9/30/95 AS OF DATE: 9/30/95 ACCOUNT NO: 203 County Sanitation Districts-Orange Co. BANK ACCT: OCSF0752222 CUSIP DESCRIPTION TRADE ORIGINAL FACE BROKER FACTOR COMMISSIONS GAIN/LOSS DELIVERY CURRENCY TRADE NO COUPON MATURITY TICKET # SETTLE PAR/SNARES/CTY PRICE PRINCIPAL SEC FEE INTEREST B/S ISITC NET AMOUNT -.-•------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ BUY 171196ANS CHRYSLER CORP DEB 9/07/95 MLP DTC USD 21 10.4000% 8/01/99 A- S 9/12/95 1,500,000.00 106.8880000 1,603,320.00 17,766.67 1,621,086.67 090795 0109 ISITC 17120ONT4 CHRYSLER FIN CORP MTN OD 4/13/95 9/07/95 SAL SDI USD 23 7.2700% 4/13/98 A- S 9/12/95 2,900,D00.00 101.8240000 2,952,996.00 87,260.19 3,040,156.19 090795 0070 ISITC -REVISION OF INTEREST* 17120OPYI CHRYSLER FIN MTN SER-P DD7/18/95 9/07/95 SAL SDI USD 7 6.2600% 7/20/98 A- S 9/12/95 1,000,000.00 99.3160000 993,160.00 9,390.00 1,002,550.00 090795 0071 ISITC 9850906A2 BOSTON RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT 9/07/95 ND USD 6 4.0000% 12/31/24 Al S 9/07/95 1.00 100.0000000 1.00 1.00 090795 1000 171200JJI CHRYSLER FIN MTN SER N 1/11/95 9/DS/95 GSC SDI USD 33 8.1600% 1/13/97 A- 9/13/95 1,500,000.00 102.3180000 1,534,770.00 60,520.00 1,595,290.00 090895 0100 ISITC 171200JJI CHRYSLER FIN MTN SER N 1111/95 9/08/95 GSC SDI USD 42 8.1600% 1/13/97 A- S 9/13/95 1,500,000.00 102.3300000 1,534,950.00 60,520.OD 1,595,470.00 090895 0100-6 ISITC 'REVISION OF PRICE 171200KH3 CHRYSLER FIN CORP MTN DTD1/31/95 9/08/95 DNR SDI USD 27 8.0800% 1/31/97 A- S 9/13/95 465,000.00 102.3597000 475,972.61 18,577.27 494,549.88 090895 0078 ISITC 17120OLT6 CHRYSLER FIN MTN SER-N DTD3/3/95 9/08/95 GSC SDF USD 32 7.3800% 3/17/97 A- S 9/13/95 1,500,000.00 101.47600DO 1,522,140.00 58,425.00 1,58D,565.00 090895 0088 ISITC 29348PAC8 ENOGEN MTN 8/7/95 PRIV 144-A 9/08/95 MLP SDF USD 43 6.7700% 8/07/00 A- S 9/13/95 5,000,000.00 100.167000D 5,008,350.00 33,550.00 5,042,200.00 090895 0082 ISITC 345402D21 FORD MTR CR CO MTN INN DTII/8/93 9/08/95 PRU SDF USD 24 5.9400% 11/09/98 A S 9/13/95 4,000,000.00 99.2620000 3,970,480.00 23,434.52 3,993,914.52 090895 0044 ISITC 3454D2HJ3 FORD NTR CA CO MTN FRN DD3/30/94 9/08/95 PRU SDF USD 29 5.4900% 3/30/99 A S 9/13/95 7,100,000.00 98.5880000 6,999,748.00 80,093.84 7,079,841.84 090895 0099 ISITC -INFO SHEET ATTACHED- Pay Codes: IS' indicates SETTLED, ,e, indicates UNSETTLED PROGRAM NAME: PI0022 T R A N 5 A C I I 0 N J O U R N A L PAGE: 2 RUN DATE: 10/04/95 8/31/95 THRU 9/30/95 AS OF DATE: 9/30/95 ACCOUNT NO: 203 County Sanitation Districts-Orange Co. BANK ACCT: OCSF0752222 CUSIP DESCRIPTION TRADE ORIGINAL FACE BROKER FACTOR COMMISSIONS GAIN/LOSS DELIVERY CURRENCY TRADE NO COUPON MATURITY TICKET B SETTLE PAR/SNARES/DTY PRICE PRINCIPAL SEC FEE INTEREST B/S ISITC NET AMOUNT .......................................................................................................................................................... BUY 436904API HOME SAVINGS OF AMERICA SUB MT 9/08/95 PRU DTC USD 25 10.5000% 6/12/97 A- . S 9/13/95 1,750,000.00 102.1128000 1,786,974.00 46,447.92 1,833,421.92 090895 0045 ISITC 524909ADO LEHMAN BROS INC SR SUB NOTE 9/08/95 PRU SDF USD 26 7.0000% 5/15/97 A S 9/13/95 1,000,DOO.00 100.7520000 1,007,520.00 22,944.44 1,030,464.44 090895 OOB1 ISITC 718154BB2 PHILIP MORRIS DEB 9/08/95 NBC DTC USD 28 9.2500% 2/15/00 A S 9/13/95 4,000,OOD.00 110.0120000 4,400,480.00 28,777.78 4,429,257.78 09DB95 0094 ISITC 912794T38 U S TREASURY BILLS 9/08/95 FOB 5.69000000 FBE USD 14 5.6900% 9/21/95 AAA S 9/08/95 50,000,000.00 99.7945277 49,897,263.89 49,897,263.89 090895 0040 ISITC 'CONFIRMATION ONLY' 912794738 U S TREASURY BILLS Satins FOB 5.69000000 FBE USO 15 5.6900% 9/21/95 AAA S 9/08/95 11,000,000.00 99.7945277 10,977,398.06 10,977,398.06 090895 0040 ISITC 'CONFIRMATION ONLY' AS151206A ASSOC CORP OF NO AMERICA DISC NT 9/08/95 DIR PHY USD 10 5.6800% 12/06/95 Al. S 9/08/95 11,500,000.00 98.5957777 11,338,514.44 11,338,514.44 090895 0003-A ISITC -CONFIRMATION ONLY' NOTE: PHYSICAL PEKES: 2N5MM, TN 1NM, 1N500K FN150911A F H L M C DISC MT- 9/08/95 GSC FBE USD 18 5.5800% 9/11/95 A1- S 9/08/95 46,000,000.00 99.9535000 45,979,610.00 45,978,610.00 090895 0042 ISITC 'CONFIRMATION ONLY' NOTE: CUSIP 313396LP6 FNI51103A F N N A DISC HT' 9/08/95 MLP FBE USD 16 5.5800% 11/03/95 AT+ 5 9/08195 46,000,000.00 99.1320000 45,600,720.00 45,600,720.00 D90895 0041 ISITC 'CONFIRMATION ONLY' NOTE: CUSIP 313588NU5 ON151208A ONTARIO HYDRO DISC NT 9/08/95 DOM PRY USD 11 5.6600% 12/08/95 AT- S 9/08/95 11,OOD,000.00 98.5692778 10,842,620.56 10,842,620.56 090895 0006-A ISITC 'CONFIRMATION ONLY' UTR509118 U S TREASURY REPO 9/08195 SLH FBE USD 19 5.7300% 9/11/95 AAA S 9108/95 46,000,000.00 100.0000000 46,000,000.00 46,000,000.00 090895 D005-A 'CONFIRMATION ONLY' NOTE: COLL. 9128271199 23.4MM VS 22.635MM 912827NT5 23.205MN VS 23.365MM Pay Codes: $S' indicates SETTLED, 1'1 Indicates UNSETTLED PROGRAM NAME: P10022 T R A N S A C T I O N J O U R N A L PAGE: 3 RUN DATE: 10/04/95 8/31/95 TNRU 9/30/95 AS OF DATE: 9/30/95 ACCOUNT NO: 203 County Sanitation Districts-Dran9e Co. BANK ACCT: OCSF0752222 CUSIP DESCRIPTION TRADE ORIGINAL FACE BROKER FACTOR COMMISSIONS GAIN/LOSS DELIVERY CURRENCY TRADE NO COUPON MATURITY TICKET p SETTLE PAR/SNARES/OTY PRICE PRINCIPAL SEC FEE INTEREST B/S ISITC NET AMOUNT .......................................................................................................................................................... BLy WA151006A WAL-MART STORES DISC NT- 9/08195 JPM SDP USD 12 5.71002 10/06/95 A1' S 9/08/95 11,500,000.00 99.5558888 11,448,927.22 11,448,927.22 'CONFIRMATION ONLY' 090B95 0004-e NOTE: CUSIP 93114BN65 ISITC 912794T38 U S TREASURY BILLS 9/11/95 FOB 5.70000000 THE USD 38 5.7D00% 9/21/95 AAA S 9/11/95 50,000,000.00 99.8416666 49,920,833.33 09119s 0001 49,920,833.33 -CONFIRMATION ONLY' ISITC 912794T38 U S TREASURY BILLS 9/11/95 FOB 5.70000000 FEE USD 39 5.7000% 9/21/95 AAA S 9/11/95 9,400,000.00 99.8416666 9,385,116.67 091195 0001 9,385,116.67 'CONFIRMATION ONLY' ISITC UTR50912A U S TREASURY REPO 9/11/95 DAI THE USD 40 5.7500% 9/12/95 AAA S 9/11/95 32,500,000.00 100.0000000 32,500,000.00 32,500,000.00 091195 0007 'CONFIRMATION ONLY' NOTE: LOLL. 23.060MM 912810pM8 UTR50913B U S TREASURY REPO 9/12/95 SLR FBE USD 49 5.7000% 9/13/95 AAA S 9/12/95 29,400,000.00 100.0000000 29,400,000.00 29,400,000.00 091295 0010 'CONFIRMATION ONLY* NOTE: COLLATERAL- 26.610MM 912827R87 N9ISIIIOA NEW SOUTH WALES THY CORP BBC MT' 9/13/95 HAS SDF USD 52 5.6600% 11/10/95 AT- S 9/13/95 5,500,000.00 99.u881111 5,449,846.11 5,449,346.11 091395 ODOR-B ISITC 'CONFIRMATION ONLY* NOTE: CUSIP: 648BOKYA8 UTM509146 U S TREASURY REPO 9/13/95 DAI FBE USD 53 5.7800% 9/14/95 AAA S 9/13/95 6,600,000.00 100.0000000 6,60Do OOO.00 6,600,000.00 091395 0009-B 'CONFIRMATION ONLY' NOTE: COLLATERAL= 6.23OMN 912827S29 OT951212A QUEENSLAND TSY CORP DISC NT' 9/14/95 MLP SDF USD 58 5.6300% 12/12/95 AT- S 9114/95 400,000.00 98.6081400 394,432.56 394,432.56 091495 0004 ISITC -CONFIRMATION ONLY' NOTE: CUSIP: 74830S2C6 37042RK04 GEN MTR ALL CORP MTN DTD1/10/95 9/18/95 JPM SDF USD 65 8.6250% 1110/00 A- S 9/21/95 3,000,000.00 107.5690000 3,227,070.00 122,187.50 3,349,257.50 091895 D082 ISITC 37042RPM8 GEN MTRS ACC CORP MTN 2/3/95 9/18/95 JPM HOF USD 66 8.3750% 2/03/99 A- S 9121/95 3,700,000.00 105.7200000 3,911,640.00 146,329.86 4,057,969.96 091895 0083 ISITC Pay Codes: IS' indicates SETTLED, I" indicates UNSETTLED PROGRAM NAME: P10022 T R A N S A C T 1 0 N J O U R N A L PAGE: 4 RUN DATE: 10/04/95 8/31/95 THRU 9/30/95 AS OF DATE: 9/30/95 ACCOUNT NO: 203 County Sanitation Districts-Orange Co. BANK ACCT: OCSF0752222 CUSIP DESCRIPTION TRADE ORIGINAL FACE BROKER FACTOR COMMISSIONS GAIN/LOSS DELIVERY CURRENCY TRADE NO COUPON MATURITY TICKET N SETTLE PAN/SNARES/OTY PRICE PRINCIPAL SEC FEE INTEREST B/S ISITC NET AMOUNT .......................................... ..--------------------.-___----.__-.._..__..-__-_.__........_..___---_....__------_..._____-_._.._- BUY 71815411112 PMILIP MORRIS DEB 9/18/95 PRU OTC USD 63 9.2500% 2/15100 A 5 9/21/95 5,000,000.00 110.0660000 5,503,300.00 46,250.00 5,549,550.00 091895 0084 ISITC 81238XUJS SEARS ROEBUCK CO MTN DID 2/28/95 9/18/95 MSC SDI USD 64 7.6900% 2/27/98 A 5 9/21/95 1,000,000.00 103.1860000 1,031,860.00 36,313.89 1,068,173.89 091895 0087 ISITC 31359CBN6 FNMA SR UNSUR BD 9/20/95 MLP THE USD 67 6.8500% 5/26/00 AAA S 9/21/95 25,000,000.00 101.4062500 25,351,562.50 547,048.61 25,898,611.11 09209S 0033 ISITC • U R G E N T ' FN151215A I N L M C DISC NT* 9/21/95 GSC FBE USD 70 5.4700% 12/15/95 AT- S 9/21/95 1,500,D00.00 98.708472E 1,480,627.08 1,480,627.08 092195 0019 ISITC -CONFIRMATION ONLY' NOTE: CUSIP: 3133969016 FH151215A F H L M C DISC NT- 9/21/95 GSC FBE USD 71 5.470U% 12/18/95 A1• S 9/21/95 22,000,000.00 98.6628589 21,705,835.56 21,705,835.56 092195 0020 ISITC *CONFIRMATION ONLY' NOTE: CUSIP 3133960R7 FL151023A FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK DISC NT• 9/21/95 FOS FBE USD 69 5.5700% 10/23/95 Al S 9/21/95 44,000,000.00 99.504888E 43,782,151.11 43,782,151.11 092195 0001 ISITC -CONFIRMATION ONLY* NOTE: CUSIP: 313384NN8 UTR5D922A U S TREASURY REPO 9/21/95 MLP THE USD 72 5.6000% 9/22/95 AAA S 9/21/95 18,700,000.00 100.000DD00 18,700,000.00 15,700,000.00 092195 0024-C -CONFIRMATION ONLY' NOTE: COLLATERAL:.CUSIP 912827594, FACE 18,700,000 UTR50925A U S TREASURY REPO 9/22/95 FCN FBE USD 76 5.5700% 9125/95 AAA S 9/22/95 13,200,000.DO 100.0000000 13,2OD,000.00 13,200,000.00 092295 0002-8 -CONFIRMATION ONLY' NOTE: COLL: 912827U91 13.385M AT151103D AMERICAN TELEPHONE 8 TEL DIS NT' 9/25/95 MLP SDI USD 80 5.7200% 11/03/95 A1• S 9/25/95 11,000,000.00 99.3803333 10,931,836.67 10,931,836.67 092595 0001 ISITC -CONFIRMATION ONLY' NOTE: CUSIP 07018BY37 UTR50926A U S TREASURY REPD 9/25/95 GAT FBE USD 81 5.6500% 9/26/95 AAA S 9/25/95 2,700,000.00 100.0000000 2,700,000.00 2,700,000.00 092595 0006 *CONFIRMATION ONLY* NOTE: COLLAT: 2.810104 CUSIP 912827J94 Pay Codes: �S• indicates SETTLED, 1*' indicates UNSETTLED PROGRAM NAME: P10022 T R A N 5 A C T 1 0 N J O U R N A L PAGE: 5 RUN DATE: 10/04/95 8/31/95 TNRU 9/30/95 AS OF DATE: 9/30/95 ACCOUNT NO: 203 County Sanitation Districts-Orange Co. BANK ACCT: OCSF0752222 CUSIP DESCRIPTION TRADE ORIGINAL FACE BROKER FACTOR COMMISSIONS GAIN/LOSS DELIVERY CURRENCY TRADE NO COUPON MATURITY TICKET IF SETTLE PAR/SNARES/OTY PRICE PRINCIPAL SEC FEE INTEREST B/S ISITC NET AMOUNT --------------------------------------------------- BUY B UTR50927A U 5 TREASURY REPO 9/26/95 FCN FBE USD 85 5.5500% 9/27/95 AAA S 9/26/95 27,700,000.00 100.0000000 27,700,000.00 27,700,000.00 092695 0004 -CONFIRMATION ONLY" NOTE: COLLAT:27.205MM CUSIP 912827C83 UTR50928C U S TREASURY REPO 9/27/95 GAT FBE USE, 88 5.7700% 9/28/95 AAA S 9/27/95 27,600,000.00 100.0000000 27,600,000.00 27,600,000.00 092795 0007 -CONFIRMATION ONLY- NOTE: COLLAT: 9128271192 25.980MM 3134AOM02 FED NM LN DEB DO 10/2/95 9/28/95 MCD FBE USO 92 6.7200% 10/02/00 AAA • 10/02/95 25,000,000.00 100.0000000 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 092895 0065 ISITC 912827R46 U 5 TREASURY NOTE 9/28/95 SEE FBE USD 94 7.1250% 9/30/99 AAA • 10/02/95 50,000,000.00 103.5937500 51,796,875.00 19,467.21 51,816,342.21 092895 0121 • ISITC U R G E N T " 912827R46 U S TREASURY NOTE 9/28/95 BRS FBE USD 95 7.1250% 9/30/99 AAA " 10/02/95 42,000,000.00 103.5937500 43,509,375.00 16,352.46 43,525,727.46 092895 0121 ISITC • U R G E N T UTR50929C U S TREASURY REPO 9/28/95 DAI FBE USO 91 5.8800% 9/29/95 AAA S 9/28/95 27,600,000.00 100.0000000 27,600,000.00 27,600,000.00 092895 0001-8 -CONFIRMATION ONLY* NOTE: COLLATERAL: 912794XB2 28.995MM 912827R46 U S TREASURY NOTE 9/29/95 SAL FBE USD 109 7.1250% 9/30/99 AAA • 10/02/95 5,000,000.00 103.8593750 5,192,968.75 1,946.72 5,194,915.47 092995 0084 • URGENT • ISITC UTR510U2A U S TREASURY REPO 9/29/95 GAT FBE USD 101 6.2000% 10/02/95 AAA S 9/29/95 27,600,000.00 100.0000000 27,600,000.00 27,600,000.00 092995 0007-A *CONFIRMATION ONLY* NOTE: COLLATERAL: 9128271.67 28.580001 9050906A2 BOSTON RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT 9/30/95 NO USD 115 3.9900% 12/31/24 Al 5 9/30/95 384,868.73 10O.D000000 384,868.73 384,868.73 Pay Codes: 'S' indicates SETTLED, 1•0 indicates UNSETTLED PROGRAM NAME: P10022 T R A N S A C T I O N J O U R N A L PAGE: 6 RUN DATE: 10/04/95 8/31/95 THRU 9/30/95 AS OF DATE: 9/30/95 ACCOUNT NO: 203 County Sanitation Districts-Orange Co. BANK ACCT: OCSF0752222 CUSIP DESCRIPTION TRADE ORIGINAL FACE BROKER FACTOR COMMISSIONS GAIN/LOSS DELIVERY CURRENCY TRADE NO COUPON MATURITY TICKET N SETTLE PAR/SHARES/OTY PRICE PRINCIPAL SEC FEE INTEREST BIG ISITC NET AMOUNT ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bm 17120QJJI CHRYSLER FIN MTN SER N 1/11/95 9/08/95 GSC SDF USD 41 8.1600% 1/13/97 CANCELLED 9/13/95 1,500,000.00- 102.3180000 1,534,770.00- 60,520.00- 1,595,290.00- 090895 0100 ISITC ------------------- ------............ TOTALS ""`*'* 755,900,244.85 787,323,629.73 ---------------- ..............---------------------------...........................----------------..................------------------------ Se1L 29348PAC8 ENOGE% MTN 8/7/95 PRIV 144-A 9/11/95 MLP SDF USD 44 6.7700% 8/07/00 A- S 9/13/95 5,000,000.00 100.1670000 5,008,350.00 33,850.00 5,042,200.00 091195 0034 ISITC DELIVER TO: SOF DTCM 5132 RE: Merrill Lynch PF&5 FNI51103A F N M A DISC NT- 9/25195 HIP 5.58000000 THE USD 82 5.5800% 11/03/95 A1" S 9/26/95 25,000,000.00 99.1320000 24,783,000.00 69,750.00 24,852,750.00 092595 0035-A ISITC ` U R G E N T ' NOTE: CUSIP 313588MUS DELIVER TO: ABA# 0210-0012-8 CHEMICAL NYC/MERRILL FNIS1218A F N L M C DISC MT- 9/28/95 SLH 5.60000000 FBE USD 97 5.4700% 12/18/95 AT- • 10/02/95 22,000,000.00 95.6628889 21,705,835.56 30,653.33 21,736,488.89 092895 0078 ISITC ` U R G E N T ` NOTE: CUSIP 313396GR7 DELIVER TO: ABAM 0210-0012-8 CHEMICAL NYC/LEHMAN ------------------- -----------..---. TOTALS '*"" 51,497,185.56 51,631,438.89 Pay Codes: IS' indicates SETTLED, 1'1 indicates UNSETTLED PROGRAM NAME: P10022 T R A N S A C T I O N J 0 U R N A L PAGE: 1 RUN DATE: 10/04/95 8/31195 TNRU 9/30/95 AS OF DATE: 9/30/95 ACCOUNT NO: 603 County Sanitation Districts-Orange C0.(Liq-0p) BANK ACCT: OCSF0751112 CUSIP DESCRIPTION TRADE ORIGINAL FACE BROKER FACTOR COMMISSIONS GAIN/LOSS DELIVERY CURRENCY TRADE NO COUPON MATURITY TICKET N SETTLE PAR/SNARES/OTT PRICE PRINCIPAL SEC FEE INTEREST BIG ISITC NET AMOUNT 1my 9850906A2 BOSTON RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT 9/07/95 ND USD 4 4.0000% 12/31/24 Al S 9/07/95 1.00 100.0000000 1.00 1.00 090795 1000 912794738 U S TREASURY BILLS 9/08/95 FOR 5.69000000 FOE USD 11 5.6900% 9/21/95 AAA S 9/08/95 15,000,ODO.00 99.7945277 14,969,179.16 14,969,179.16 090895 0040 ISITC 'CONFIRMATION ONLY- ASISIZ04A ASSOC CORP OF NO AMERICA DISC NT 9/08/95 DIR PHY USD 7 5.6800% 12/04/95 A1+ S 9/08/95 3,000,000.00 98.6273333 2,958,820.00 2,958,820.00 090895 0002-A ISITC 'CONFIRMATION ONLY* NOTE: PHYSICAL PIECES 1%3MM, FNI50911A F M L M C DISC NT* 9/08/95 GSC FEE USD 14 5.5800% 9/11/95 AT+ S 9/08/95 12,000,000.00 99.9535000 11,994,420.00 11,994,420.00 090895 0042 ISITC -CONFIRMATION ONLY* NOTE: CUSIP 313396LP6 FNI51103A F N M A DISC NT* 9/08/95 MLP FBE USD 12 5.5800% 11/03/95 AT+ S 9/08195 12,000,000.00 99.1320000 11,895,840.00 11,895,840.00 090895 0041 ISITC 'CONFIRMATION ONLY* NOTE: CUSIP 313588NU5 ON151208A ONTARIO HYDRO DISC NT 9/08/95 DON PRY USD 9 5.6600% 12/08/95 At+ S 9/08/95 3,000,000.00 98.5692776 2,957,078.33 2,957,078.33 090895 0006-A ISITC *CONFIRMATION ONLY` UTR50911B U S TREASURY REPO 9/08/95 SLH FBE USD 15 5.7300% 9/11/95 AAA S 9/08/95 12,00,000.00 100.0000000 12,000,000.00 12,000,000.00 090895 0005-A *CONFIRMATION ONLY* NOTE: COLL. 9128271147 12.135MM WC1509105 U S NEST COMMUNICATIONS DISC NT* 9108/95 GSC SDI USD 8 5.7000% 9/18/95 AT+ S 9/08/95 3,000,000.00 99.8416666 2,995,250.00 2,995,250.00 090895 0009-B ISITC *CONFIRMATION ONLY* NOTE: CUSIP 91289GWJO 912794T38 U S TREASURY BILLS 9/11/95 FOR 5.70000000 FEE USD 24 5.7000% 9/21/95 AAA S 9/11/95 24,100,000.00 99.8416666 24,061,841.67 24,061,841.67 091195 0001-A ISITC *CONFIRMATION ONLY' Pay Codes: IS' indicates SETTLED, I*' indicates UNSETTLED PROGRAM NAME: P10022 T R A N S A C T 1 0 N J O U R N A L PAGE: 2 RUN DATE: 10/04/95 8/31/95 THRU 9/30/95 AS OF DATE: 9/30/95 ACCOUNT NO: 603 County Sanitation Districts-Orange CO.(Liq-Op) BANK ACCT: OCSF0751112 CUSIP DESCRIPTION TRADE ORIGINAL FACE BROKER FACTOR COMMISSIONS GAIN/LOSS DELIVERY CURRENCY TRADE NO COUPON MATURITY TICKET N SETTLE PAR/SNARES/OTY PRICE PRINCIPAL SEC FEE INTEREST B/S ISITC NET AMOUNT ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- B AN360201A REPUBLIC NEN YORK CORP BKRS ACC 9/13/95 SLN PNY USD 25 5.5700% 2/01/96 A1* S 9/14/95 3,000,000.00 97.8338890 2,935,016.67 2,935,016.67 091395 0030 ISITC • U R G E N T - NOTE: PHYSICAL PIECES 3XIMM 242998MZI ** DO NOT USE - USE 25466P9J9 ** 9/15/95 MSC SDF USD 28 9.0000% 8/01/96 A 9/20/95 2,000,000.00 102.5200000 2,050,400.00 84,500.00 2,134,900.00 091595 OO83 ISITC 25466P9J9 DISCOVER CREDIT CORP MTN D8/1/91 9/15/95 NBC PNY USD 37 9.0000% 8/01/96 A S 9/20/95 2,000,000.00 102.5200000 2,050,400.00 84,500.00 2,134,900.00 D91595 0083 ISITC *REVISION OF DELIVERY TYPE* NOTE: PHYSICAL: 1 PIECE K 2MM * U R G E N T * 812387AT5 SEARS ROEBUCK DEB 9/15/95 MSC DTC USD 27 8.5500% 8/01/96 A S 9/20/95 2,500,000.00 102.1620000 2,554,050.00 29,093.75 2,583,143.75 091595 0079 ISITC UTR50919A U S TREASURY REPO 9/18/95 GAT FEE USD 31 5.75001 9/19/95 AAA 5 9/18/95 3,100,000.00 100.0000000 3,100,000.00 3,100,000.00 D91895 0018-A *CONFIRMATION ONLY* NOTE: COLL: 912827M66 3.225MM KFI51023A KFN INTERNATIONAL FIN. DISC NT* 9/19/95 SLN SDF USD 34 5.7000% 10/23/95 Al- 5 9/19/95 1,000,000.00 99.4616670 994,616.67 994,616.67 D91995 0010 ISITC -CONFIRMATION ONLY* NOTE: CUSIP: 48246KXPB UTR50920A U S TREASURY REPO 9/19/95 Dal THE USD 35 5.6500% 9/20195 AAA S 9/19/95 2,000,000.00 100.0000000 2,000,000.00 2,000,OOD.00 091995 0009 *CONFIRMATION ONLY* NOTE: COLL: 9128271.26 2.040MN FH151215A F H L M C DISC NT* 9/21/95 GSC FEE USD 43 5.4700% 12/15/95 A1* S 9/21/95 6,500,000.00 98.7084722 6,416,050.70 6,416,050.70 092195 0019 ISITC *CONFIRMATION ONLY* NOTE: CUSIP: 3133960116 FL151023A FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK DISC NT* 9/21/95 FOB FOE USO 41 5.5700% 10/23/95 Al 5 9/21/95 12,000,000.00 99.5048888 11,940,586.67 11,940,586.67 092195 0001 ISITC *CONFIRMATION ONLY* NOTE: CUSIP: 313384NNO Pay Codes: 'S� indicates SETTLED, 1*0 indicates UNSETTLED PROGRAM NAME: P10022 T R A N S A C T I O N J O U A N A L PAGE: 3 RUN DATE: 10/04/95 8/31/95 THRU 9/30/95 AS OF DATE: 9/30/95 ACCOUNT NO: 603 County Sanitation Districts-Orange CO.(Liq-0p) BANK ACCT: OCSF0751112 CUSIP DESCRIPTION TRADE ORIGINAL FACE BROKER FACTOR COMMISSIONS GAIN/LOSS DELIVERY CURRENCY TRADE NO COUPON MATURITY TICKET N SETTLE PAR/SHARES/CTY PRICE PRINCIPAL SEC FEE INTEREST B/S ISITC NET AMOUNT ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BUY GP951013C GEN ELEC CAPITAL CORP DISC His 9/21/95 SLH SDP USD 42 5.7100% 10/13/95 AT- S 9/21/95 3,000,000.00 99.6510555 2,989,531.67 2,989,531.67 092195 0010 ISITC -CONFIRMATION ONLY' NOTE: CUSIP: 36959J%00 UTR50922A U S TREASURY REPO 9/21/95 MLP FBE USD 44 5.6000% 9/22/95 AAA S 9/21/95 12,000,000.00 1DO.000OODO 12,000,000.00 12,000,00D.00 092195 0024-C -CONFIRMATION ONLY- NOTE: COLLATERAL:. CUSIP 912827S94 FACE 12,000,000 UTR50925A U S TREASURY REPO 9/22/95 FCH FBE USO 51 5.5700% 9/25/95 AAA S 9/22/95 12,000,000.00 100.0000000 12,000,000.00 12,000,ODO.00 092295 0002-B -CONFIRMATION ONLY* NOTE: COLL: 912827U91 12.165MM A7151103D AMERICAN TELEPHONE % TEL DIS MT- 9/25/95 MLP SOT USD 54 5.7200% 11/D3/95 AT- S 9/25/95 3,000,000.00 99.3803333 2,981,410.00 2,981,410.00 092595 0001 ISITC -CONFIRMATION ONLY' NOTE: CUSIP 03018BY37 UTR50926A U S TREASURY REPO 9/25/95 GAT FBE USD 55 5.6500% 9/26195 AAA S 9/25/95 9,000,000.00 100.0000000 9,000,000.00 9,000,000.00 092595 0006 -CONFIRMATION ONLY- NOTE: COLLAT: 8.895MM CUSIP 912827TS1 UTR50927A U S TREASURY REPO 9/26/95 FCH FBE USD 58 5.5500% 9/27/95 AAA S 9/26/95 9,000,000.00 1DO.0000000 9,000,000.00 9,000,000.DO 092695 0004 `CONFIRMATION ONLY- NOTE: COLLAT: 8.84MM CUSIP 912827C83 FH1510208 F H L M C DISC His 9/27/95 GSC FBE USD 61 5.6400% 10/20/95 AT+ S 9/27/95 6,000,000.00 99.6396666 5,978,380.00 5,978,380.00 092795 0003 ISITC -CONFIRMATION ONLY- NOTE: CUSIP 313396NE9 UTR50928C U S TREASURY REPO 9/27/95 OAT FBE USD 62 5.7700% 9/28/95 AAA S 9/27/95 3,200,000.00 100.0000000 3,20D,000.00 3,200,OOD.00 092795 0007 -CONFIRMATION ONLY' NOTE: COLLAT: 912827692 3.015MM UTR50929C U S TREASURY REPO 9/28/95 DAI FBE USD 65 5.8800% 9/29/95 AAA S 9/28/95 3,200,000.00 100.0000000 3,200,000.00 3,200,000.00 092895 0001-B -CONFIRMATION ONLY- NOTE: COLLATERAL: 912794%82 3.365MM Pay Codes: IS' indicates SETTLED, „, indicates UNSETTLED PROGRAM NAME: P10022 T R A N S A C T I O N J O U R N A L PAGE: 4 RUN DATE: 10/04/95 8131/95 TNRU 9/30/95 AS OF DATE: 9/30/95 ACCOUNT NO: 603 County Sanitation Districts-Orange CO.(Liq-Op) BANK ACCT: OCSF0751112 CUSIP DESCRIPTION TRADE ORIGINAL FACE BROKER FACTOR COMMISSIONS GAIN/LOSS DELIVERY CURRENCY TRADE NO COUPON MATURITY TICKET B SETTLE PAR/SNARES/OTY PRICE PRINCIPAL SEC FEE INTEREST B/S ISITC NET AMOUNT ........................................................ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Buy UTR51002A U S TREASURY REPO 9/29/95 DAI FBE USD 68 6.2000% 10/02/95 AAA S 9/29/95 3,200,000.00 100.0000000 3,200,000.00 3,200,000.00 092995 0007-A -CONFIRMATION ONLY' NOTE: COLLATERAL: 912827L67 3.315MM 9850906A2 BOSTON RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT 9/30/95 ND USD 72 3.9900% 12/31/24 Al S 9/30/95 128,416.80 100.0000000 128,416.80 128,416.80 242990NZI •' DO NOT USE - USE 25466P9J9 ' 9/15/95 NBC SOF USD 36 9.0000% 8/01/96 CANCELLED • 9/20/95 2,000,000.00- 102.5200000 2,050,400.00- 84,500.00- 2,134,900.00- 091595 0083 ISITC ------------------- .................. TOTALS :""' 179,500,889.34 179,614,483.D9 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sell 912794T38 U S TREASURY BILLS 9/14/95 DAI 5.69000000 1,973.35 FOE USD 26 5.6900% 9/21/95 AAA S 9/14/95 3,000,000.00 99.8893610 2,996,680.83 2,996,680.83 091495 0002 ISITC 'CONFIRMATION ONLY' DELIVER TO: ABAB 0210-0001-8 Bk of NYC/DAINA ................... ----------------- ------------ TOTALS "••" 2,996,680.83 1,973.35 2,996,680.83 Pay Codes: is' indicates SETTLED, 1" indicates UNSETTLED FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE AGENDA FOR OCTOBER 11, 1995 FAH R95-41 : SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION - Consideration of motion to receive and file staff report regarding performance monitoring of Pacific Investment Management Company Summary As indicated in the staff report to your Committee on this agenda item, Attachment"A" presents PIMCO's Monthly Reports for the Districts' Short-Tenn Liquid Operating Monies portfolio and the Long-Term Operating Monies portfolio for the period starting September 7, 1995, and ending September 30, 1995. These reports are submitted in compliance with Section 14.0, Reporting, of the Districts' Investment Policy Statement. To assist in understanding the contents of the Monthly Reports, Attachment"B' presents a brief description of each performance characteristic along with its Investment Policy reference. Please note that portfolio performance numbers are not included in the attached Monthly Reports, in that September was a structuring period for PIMCO, and therefore performance comparisons are not available. At the same time, the following earnings information is presented for the September period of investment holdings: Current Market Portfolio Initial Investment Value Earnings Short-Term $60,000,000 $60,219,369 $219,369 Long-Tenn $233,100,000 $234,268,855 $1,168,855 Total Earnings $1,388,224 Staff Recommendation Information item only. J:\W PDOGFIN\CRANETPC.MTGfAHR.95UTEM\FAHR�,41A FAlIR95-41 ATTACHMENT "A" MONTHLY REPORT COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ending September 30, 1995) Liquid Operating Monies 14.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value: $60,219,369 Historical Cost: $59,980,198 14.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: .15 Of Index: .25 14.1.3 I% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact (gain/loss) of 1% Change: $75,400 14.1.4 REVERSE REPOS % of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: (see attached schedule) 0 14.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY % of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 87% 14.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: AA 14.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING % of Portfolio Below "A": 0 14.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" 14.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Portfolio Total Rate of Return: Month: ------ 3 Months: ------ 12 Months: ------ Year-to-Date: ------ Index Total Rate of Return: I Month: ------ r imar4etlmrrmm�lrcrrmlAarr. 5 Page I of 2 FAlIR95-41 MONTHLY REPORT ATTACHMENT"A" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING ((or the month ending September 30, 1995) Long Tenn Operating Monies 14.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Markel Value: $234,268,855 Historical Cost: $232,443,340 14.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 2.6 Of Index: 2.4 14.1.3 I% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact (gain/loss) of 1% Change: $5,530,000 14.1.4 REVERSE REPOS % of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: 0% (see attached schedule) 14.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY Not Required for this Portfolio ------ 14.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: AA 14.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING % of Portfolio Below "A": 0% 14.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" 14.L9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Portfolio Total Rate of Return: 1 Month: ------ 3 Months: -----• 12 Months: ------ Year-to-Date: ------ Index Total Rate of Return: 1 Month: ------ clmnr4wltqmnnr anmOmn. Page 2 of 2 FAHR95-41 ATTACHMENT "B" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING FOR THE DISTRICTS' INVESTMENT PROGRAM POLICY REFERENCE PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTIC 14.1.1 Cost and market value of the portfolio (monthly mark-to-market). 14.1.2 Modred duration of the portfolio compared to benchmark. 14.1.3 Dollar change In value of the portfolio for a 1%change In Interest rate. 14.1.4 Percent of portfolio Invested In reverse repurchase agreements, and a schedule which matches the maturity of such reverse repurchase agreements with the cash flows which are available to repay them at maturity. 14.1.5 For the Liquid Operating Monies account only,the percent ofponYallo maturing within 90 days. 14.1.6 Average portfolio credit quality. 14.1.7 Percent of portfolio with c dlt ratings below'A"by any rating agency, and a description of such securities. 14.1.9 Listing of any transactions or holdings which do not comply with this policy or with the California Government Code. 14.1.9 Time-welghled fofal refs of return for the portfolio for the prior three months,twelve months,year- to-date, and since Inception compared to the benchmark returns for the same periods. ADDL" Comparison of portfolio performance to market index benchmark. ADDL" Comparison of Manager's performance to peer group benchmark. ADDL" Monitodng of organizational and structural changes of Investment management firm. ADDL" Audit portfolios for compliance with Investment policy guidelines. Notes ADDL = Monilodng of Addilional Performance Characteristics �w JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS MEETING AGENDA FOR OCTOBER 25, 1995 Agenda Item (11)(b)(9): FAHR 95-42 Consideration of the following actions re Establishing Policy for Microcomputer Acquisitions: (a) Consideration of motion declaring a policy that all PC technology purchases be limited to the most recent list of Tier 1 and Tier 2 vendors as defined by The GartnerGroup, for both desktop computers and mobile computers. (b) Consideration of motion declaring a policy that all purchasing actions relating to the purchase of PC technology utilize California Multiple Award Schedule (CMAS) contracts for the purchase of PC technology from among the list of Tier 1 and Tier 2 vendors as defined by The GartnerGroup; and authorizing staff to compare CMAS pricing to choose the lowest priced Tier 1 and Tier 2 vendor's configuration applicable to the Districts' needs. (c) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Dell Computer for the Purchase of 60 Personal Computers and Monitors and Other Associated Components (Specification No. E-261) for a total amount not to exceed $208,900.00 plus sales tax. Summary At the July 6, 1995 meeting of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee, item PDC95-24"Discussion of Plant Automation Computer System and Consideration of Motion Authorizing Staff to Issue Purchase Order with Pioneer-Standard Electronics for Two VAX 4000 Model 705A Computers for Plant 2 Plant Automation", was presented to the Committee. This proposal included the purchase of 32 DEC Pentium Personal Computers for Operations at both plants. The Committee authorized staff to proceed with the purchase of the Two VAX 4000 Computers for Plant 2 automation, but the purchase of the Personal Computers was deferred pending a staff evaluation to identify more cost effective options. Staff has researched a number of related issues that go beyond those addressed at the Planning, Design and Construction Committee for Plant Automation's specific request. Due to the broader issues, it was felt that the Finance, Administration and Human Resource Committee was the appropriate body to present this report. This report reviews options which have been studied by staff and recommends a plan of action for present and future microcomputer purchases, together with a request for authorization to purchase more than the original 32 Personal Computers (current request now total 60). The 32 systems which were requested in July had an average cost of $5,467. The proposed acquisition being presented in this report has decreased the average price by a range of 41780 to $2220,depending on the configuration. Staff Recommendation Information Technology recommends the following administrative policy: Budgeting for PC assets shall limit 'bump down" shifting of assets to no more than two levels. This means that a new computer may release the previous PC to be shifted to another user. That second user's old computer can then be relocated once. However, if another PC is then "bumped" from the third user, that PC is deemed to be surplus and will not be reinstalled elsewhere. User 1 User 2 User 3 New PC ----> Old PC----->Old PC ---->Surplus PC FAHR Committee Recommendation to Executive Committee The Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee recommends the Executive Committee approve the Information Technology recommended administrative policy and the recommended actions above. Executive Committee Recommendation to the Joint Boards of Directors The Executive Committee recommends that the following actions be considered by the Joint Boards of Directors: (a) Consideration of motion declaring a policy that all PC technology purchases be limited to the most recent list of Tier 1 and Tier 2 vendors as defined by The GartnerGroup, for both desktop computers and mobile computers. (b) Consideration of motion declaring a policy that all purchasing actions relating to the purchase of PC technology utilize California Multiple Award Schedule (CMAS) contracts for the purchase of PC technology from among the list of Tier 1 and Tier 2 vendors as defined by The GartnerGroup; and authorizing staff to compare CMAS pricing to choose the lowest priced Tier 1 and Tier 2 vendor's configuration applicable to the Districts' needs. (c) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Dell Computer for the Purchase of 60 Personal Computers and Monitors and Other Associated Components (Specification No. E-261) for a total amount not to exceed $208,900.00 plus sales tax. ti a v; October 2, 1995 STAFF REPORT FAHR95-42: Microcomputer Acquisition Issues SUMMARY At the July 6, 1995 meeting of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee, item PDC95-24 was presented to the Committee. This item was titled "Discussion of Plant Automation Computer System and Consideration of Motion Authorizing Staff to Issue Purchase Order with Pioneer-Standard Electronics for Two VAX 4000 Model 705A Computers for Plant 2 Plant Automation." In addition, this proposal included the purchase of 32 DEC Pentium Personal Computers for Operations at both plants. The Committee authorized staff to proceed with the purchase of the Two VAX 4000 Computers for Plant 2 automation. The purchase of the 32 Pentium Personal Computers was deferred pending a staff evaluation to identify more cost effective options. Staff has researched a number of related issues and prepared a detailed response for the Committee in a concentrated effort to obtain the best value for the Districts' Information Technology investment. The issues go beyond those addressed at the Planning, Design and Construction Committee for Plant Automation's specific request. In the months which have followed, many other requests for Personal Computers have come forward from other divisions and departments. Due to the broader issues, it was felt that the Finance, Administration and Human Resource Committee was the appropriate body to present this report. This report reviews options which have been studied by staff and recommends a plan of action for present and future microcomputer purchases, together with a request for authorization to purchase more Personal Computers. The 32 systems which were requested in July had an average cost of $5,467. The proposed acquisition being presented in this report has the average price for the same configuration lowered by $1,780 to $3,687 each. The average cost of the remaining 28 systems are $3,247 each. (The original 32 systems are for Plant Automation and have a special configuration and require larger 17-inch monitors, all of which increases the cost.) CSDOC 0 P.D.Bev 8127 0 Fountain VW1,,CA 92728-0127 0 T.I. (714)962-2411 0 FAX(714)982-3964 0 FAHR95-42 Page 2 of 11 October 2, 1995 COSTS OF COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY 1. Software Drives Hardware Needs: Many trends have developed since the creation of the Microcomputer (otherwise known as Personal Computer or PC). Over time, the power of the PC has increased while the price has decreased. These trends have received greater attention by the general public than other less-noticeable trends. The most important of these other trends is that software increasingly drives the need for hardware. The example given below is only typical of many situations which support this point. Example: The most recent evidence that software drives hardware is the new release of Windows 95. The popular price is only $89.95 for the software but several hundreds of dollars of hardware upgrades are necessary in most instances to enable Windows 95 to function acceptably. The alternative might seem to be to avoid buying Windows 95 and keep the older version, Windows 3.1; however, within the next 30 days, Microsoft Corporation, the publisher of all Windows software, will remove Windows 3.1 from the market, giving the public no choice. If a business needs to buy one or more new computers to plug into a network, the network manager is faced with the dilemma of having a mixed network -- some users with Windows 3.1 and some with Windows 95. This drives up the cost of maintaining the network as a whole. 2. Capital Cost is Only a Fraction of True Cost: The most accurate measure of the cost of PC technology extends far beyond the purchase price of the hardware. In 1987, the GartnerGroup Personal Computing service conducted its first analysis of PC ownership for corporate computing environments.' The capital cost of a typical desktop computer is only 12% of the true cost of ownership (TCO). Administration accounts for 14%, Support 57% and 'The GartnerGroup is the world's leading independent advisor to business and government professionals making information technology (IT) decisions. The Districts contract with the GartnerGroup to provide advisory services and consulting in three defined areas of expertise: Network Computing Infrastructures (NCI), Personal Computing (PC), and Office Information Systems (OIS). FAHR95-42 Page 3 of 11 October 2, 1995 End User Operations 17%. Since that first report, the five-year total cost of ownership (TCO) of a DOS-based PC has ballooned from $19,296 to $41,536 -- an increase of 153 percent.' Understanding total cost of ownership is crucial for several reasons. In a recent GartnerGroup Personal Computing Strategic Analysis Report', stated: "Even though the capital costs for hardware represent a small percentage of the TCO, consistent and carefully crafted hardware procurement strategies are critical. Enterprises should always attempt to get the best deal on hardware, but they should not make it their singular focus. Blindly focusing on price by buying the lowest-cost PC can foster heterogeneity, which increases support and administrative costs. It may also force an enterprise to buy from risky vendors. PC hardware is not a commodity nor are the vendors." It was also apparent from the GartnerGroup study that the Districts' current staffing cannot meet its current needs, much less for the balance of FY 95-96. It was with this idea in mind that Information Technology plans to outsource part or all of two major service functions: Computer Hardware Service and Software Help Desk Services. 3. The Need for Standardization: The GartnerGroup recognized many years ago that one of the keys to lowering operating costs for PC assets is through minimizing financial and technological risk. This could be accomplished by focusing PC hardware acquisitions on a tiering structure created as a result of extensive industry research. Many benchmarks were used for evaluating PC vendors but all generally fall into two categories: Financial Performance and Product Reliability. GartnerGroup's recommendations are to limit the purchase of PC assets to tier t and tier 2 vendors only. 'Desktop Computing: Management Strategies to Control The Rapidly Escalating Cost of Ownership; The GartnerGroup, Personal Computing Strategic Analysis Report, January 5, 1995; PC: R-PCTOC; W. Kirwin, E. Younker. 'Keys to Procuring and Managing PC Hardware Assets; The GartnerGroup, Personal Computing Strategic Analysis Report, September 12, 1995; PC:R-100-113; C. Goodhue, at al.; pg.4-5 FAHR95-42 Page 4 of 11 October 2, 1995 "The marketplace has historically recognized IBM, Compaq Computer Corp. and Apple Computer Inc. as indisputable Tier 1 vendors due to rock solid reliability and market clout. For users, however, recognizing the factors that separate risky Tier 3 vendors (which include a variety of small and/or financially troubled companies that should be avoided) from our recommended Tier 2 vendors (those demonstrating financial stability and high levels of quality assurance), has presented more of a challege. Our desktop vendor evaluation methodology is designed to help organizations identify those providers that offer the best investment protection and least amount of risk.i' GartnerGroup's tiering structure is a living document, constantly changing with the changes in the market place. GartnerGroup maintains two separate lists -- one for desktop computer vendors and the second for mobile computer vendors (laptops, portables, etc.) These vendors are as follows:' DESKTOP COMPUTER VENDORS MOBILE COMPUTER VENDORS Consolidated Tier 1 / Tier 2 Tier 1 Apple Acer Compaq Apple IBM AST Toshiba AT&T Bull /Zenith Compaq Digital Tier 2 Dell AST RP Bull /Zenith ' IBM Dell ICL (Europe only) Digital NEC HP Olivetti (Europe only) AT&T Siemens Nixdorf (Europe only) NEC Olivetti (Europe only) 'GartnerGroup PC Research Note, March 7, 1994: Strategic Palnning, SPA- 820-1036, C. Goodhue. 'GartnerGroup Personal Computing Strategic Analysis Report; Keys to Procuring and Managing PC Hardware Assets; PC-R-100-113; pg 8. C. Goodhue, at. al. Q FAHR95-42 Page 5 of 11 October 2, 1995 GartnerGroup's recommendations for standardization were echoed by the recent study of the Districts' Finance Department, performed by Ernst & Young at the request of the Joint Boards. This study included a review of the Information Services function, which was a part of the Finance Department at that time. In the final report, one of the recommendations called for standardization for the same reasons as those stated by GartnerGroup. 'These standards would limit the versions and levels of hardware and software that would be purchased and supported by the MIS.°s 4. Obsolescence of PC assets: Government accounting standards call for a standard 5-year depreciation for PC assets; however, actual practice has shown that the effective life of a PC averages from 18 to 36 months. The machine continues to function as a machine long after it has reached functional obsolescence due to the rapidly increasing demands of software technology. Districts' staff has sought to extend the life of its PC assets through a rigorous program of installing more memory modules, new processor boards, network cards, and other components -- all in an effort to "make do" with existing assets and avoid relegating still-functioning machines to a high tech equivalent of a "bone yard", This would then be followed by the purchase of a newer, faster PC. Another method is the "bump-down" effect. This means that when a new computer is needed, it is allocated to the user having the highest need. In turn, that user's old PC is moved to the next lower ranking user in the division, and so on. Although it maximizes PC assets, a single PC purchase means the shifting of as many as 6 PC units and occupies a full-time staff for nearly a week. These efforts have not been cost-effective and require large stockpiles of spare parts, space for service work, and increased staffing. Although a more detailed analysis is still pending, a comparison of the Districts' past methods of extending the effective life of PC assets appears to increase our service and operating costs of PC ownership far beyond the norm, negating any savings originally sought. This practice was also highly discouraged by Ernst & Young in their Finance Function Study.' 'Finance Function Review Final Report; Ernst & Young LLP; July 1995, Information Systems, pg. 7. Finance Function Review Final Report; Ernst & Young LLP; July 1995, Information Systems, pg. 4. 0 FAHR95-42 Page 6 of 11 October 2, 1995 5. Threshold of Change: A New Network Another recommendation made in the Ernst & Young report of the Finance Department was for Information Services (now Information Technology) to implement a more robust network to meet the needs of critical new applications which are rapidly approaching, such as the Financial Information System.' Information Technology (IT) is in the design phase of a new network topology, replacing the old ArcNet cabling scheme and Novell Netware file servers with a new single-domain Windows NT Server network running on Ethernet. This will provide four readily identifiable needs; a single logon for users, greater network security, the ability to implement E-mail, and the ability to install a communications server to facilitate greater ease in accessing Internet and other external data resources. All desktop PC units will be connected to the Windows NT Server; however, this major upgrade still cannot avoid the issue that the Districts has a number of PC units which are not robust enough to connect to this new network and must be replaced. 6. Staffing Required to Support Systems One of the items addressed in all discussions of the true cost of Personal Computing technology is the staff required to support such systems. Two types of personnel are required: hardware support and software support. When Personal Computers are connected together in networks such as we have here at the Districts, fewer staff are required for software support than would be required if all of the systems were not networked. This is partially offset by the fact that type of software support staff utilized must possess networking expertise, which may require obtaining higher-paid professionals. Hardware support staff required is slightly more for networked environments because of the need to support the networking hardware infrastructure. The study conducted by Ernst & Young mentioned that the Information Technology staff was stretched too thin. Gartner Group analysis recommends one FTE hardware support staff person per every 75 to 100 Personal Computers. The Districts now employees 3 FTEs for 375 computers. More systems need to be purchased before the end of FY 95-96. Information Technology would require at least two additional FTE for hardware support and one more FTE for software support. In an effort to save the Districts money, Information Technology budgeted for a hardware maintenance contract and a contract for software help desk services 'Finance Function Review Final Report; Ernst & Young LLP; July 1995; Information Systems, pg. 8. a FAHR95-42 Page 7 of 11 October 2, 1995 for FY 95-96 instead of requesting the three additional FTE staff. In this manner, Information Services will partially out-source these activities and free the existing staff to perform preventative maintenance and work on other activities which staff has not had enough time to work on. OPTIONS STUDIED Item number six above dealt with staffing required to support the Districts PC assets. Information Services staff has contacted several service vendors to obtain preliminary information on levels of service, service quality, separation of duties and responsibilities as well as cost estimates. The budget for computer hardware services for FY 95-96 was $90,000 and software help desk services was $60,000. Following more detailed study, staff estimates of computer hardware services will cost $84,000 and software help desk services will cost $56,000, all for FY 95-96. In light of the issues reviewed in items 1-5 above, the Districts needs greater flexibility in addressing the issues of acquiring PC assets. Four options were reviewed: 1. The previous method was revisited. This method involved batching the Purchase Requests of the various departments and divisions and making general purchases 2 or 3 times per year. The rationale of this method was that the aggregate of the requests would usually be large enough to involve public bids and Board authorization to issue a Purchase Order to the lowest responsible bidder. Many problems were experienced with this method: a. The need for PC units could not always be relegated to such a rigid time table. b. Staff effort to prepare combined specifications, prepare for bids and evaluate the bids was burdensome. C. Early experience in not pre-qualifying PC make and models resulted in numerous problems. Later efforts to pre-qualify met with only limited success. Typical low-bid were in what GartnerGroup now calls tier 3. One major manufacturer went out of business, leaving us with a number of "orphaned" PC units which could not be upgraded. v s FAHR95-42 Page 8 of 11 October 2, 1995 d. Cost savings were difficult to realize as third-party vendors would inflate their mark-up to limit their exposure to a highly volatile market place. Due to the lengthy time span from specification, to bid, to certification, to award, to delivery -- some items would no longer be available or prices would change substantially. 2. Staff investigated the methods used by the County of Orange. The County of Orange used to issue a master contract with a third-party vendor to buy computer hardware and software on an as-needed basis. This contract would run 3 years (in part made necessary due to the length of time needed for negotiation and evaluation prior to contract award or renewal.) The contract would specify exact models and prices. This method had a number of failings. First and foremost, it locked in the County to prices which invariably dropped during the contract period. Most vendors would not be willing to negotiate for a fixed discount due to the volatility of the market. The only saving grace is the volume which the County could bring to a fixed discount contract. Since the bankruptcy, the County no longer has a master contract but has used a variety of methods, sharing two contracts with Los Angeles County and one with Merced County. They have also tried using California Multiple Award Schedule (see item 4 below). However, due to a lack of County-wide standards, various departments and agencies have made conflicting demands which have finally led County GSA to simply solicit the 3 lowest prices from a list of PC third party vendors and issue the Purchase Order to the lowest. 3. Two types of leasing plans were investigated by IT Department staff. The first involved a "Operating Lease" which would provide PC units, hardware support, software support, help desk services, installation, training and asset management -- all for a fixed price. The Districts would cease to own PC assets. All PC assets would be established on a 36-month rotation. At the end of 36 months, the old machine would be returned and replaced by the latest technology -- with no residual payment. The second leasing plan was almost identical to the first but the parties would separate the contracts so that the PC asset lease was a separate instrument from the Hardware Support and the Help Desk Services. No asset management or training was included. a FAHR95-42 Page 9 of 11 October 2, 1995 Both of these plans were attractive to staff because of the burden that would be shifted to the vendor. However, in the absence of any tax advantages (which are not applicable to the Districts), the cost of leasing PC assets is not cost effective. 4. In January 1995, a new type of cooperative agreement came to the attention of the IT Department staff. This was the California Multiple Award Schedule, or CMAS. Our initial interest was focused on a CMAS agreement between the State of California and Digital Equipment Corporation. Shortly after this, many other vendors signed similar CMAS agreements with the state, making this a popular method of acquiring discounts which the Districts could not otherwise negotiate. This method shows the most promise to provide a cost-effective way to eliminate the delays which have hampered the timely acquisition of Personal Computers for Districts staff. All purchases over $50,000 will be brought to the Committee and, subsequently, the Joint Boards, for approval. CURRENT SITUATION The 1995-96 budget approved by the Joint Boards in June of 1995 provided funding for the purchase of 171 Personal Computers. In July, the 32 Pentium Personal Computers, which the Committee placed on hold pending more study, were valued at $174,942.72. The total number of Personal Computers requested for immediate purchase now totals 60. This includes the original 32 for Plant Automation. Information Technology staff has studied the Gartner Group Tier 1/2 list of vendors and determined that of the 14 vendors listed: 3 have European sales only 1 has systems not compatible with existing Districts systems 1 (AT&T) has announced a halt to PC production 1 has had difficulty providing quality service locally 1 is not marketing locally i has no CMAS agreement in force v FAHR95-42 Page 10 of 11 October 2, 1995 This leaves 6 recommended vendors who have CMAS contracts: Acer, Compaq, IBM, Digital, Dell and HP. Using a standard configuration, Information Technology staff obtained CMAS quotes from each of the six vendors to determine the lowest priced system for purchase through the CMAS contract. The 32 systems which were requested in July had an average cost of $5,467. Following the CMAS pricing of the lowest of the six Gartner-recommended Tier 1/2 vendors, the average price for the same configuration decreased by $1,780 to $3,687 each. The average cost of the remaining 28 systems are $3,247 each. (The original 32 systems are for Plant Automation and have a special configuration and require larger 17-inch monitors, all of which increases the cost.) RECOMMENDATIONS Information Technology recommends the following administrative policy: Budgeting for PC assets shall limit "bump down" shifting of assets to no more than two levels. This means that a new computer may release the previous PC to be shifted to another user. That second user's old computer can then be relocated once. However, if another PC is then "bumped" from the third user, that PC is deemed to be surplus and will not be reinstalled elsewhere. User 1 User 2 User 3 New PC ----> Old PC----->Old PC ------>Surplus PC Information Technology proposes the following four actions for the Committee: 1. It is proposed that the Committee recommend to the Joint Board that the Districts' policy with regards to standards for PC technology shall be that all PC technology purchases be limited to the most recent list of tier 1 and tier 2 vendors as defined by GartnerGroup, for both desktop computers and mobile computers. 2. It is proposed that the Committee recommend to the Joint Boards that the Districts policy state that, with regards to the purchase of PC technology all purchasing actions utilize California Multiple Award Schedule (CMAS) contracts for the purchase of PC technology from among the list of tier 1 and tier 2 vendors as mentioned in the previous motion. FAHR95-42 Page 11 of 11 October 2, 1995 Staff will compare CMAS pricing and choose the lowest priced Tier 1 and Tier 2 vendor's configuration applicable to the Districts' needs. 3. Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Dell Computer, the lowest priced Gartner Tier 1/2 vendor at this time, in a total amount not to exceed $208,900.00, including sales tax, for the Purchase of 60 Personal Computers and monitors and other associated components (Specification No. E-261). 4. It is proposed that the Committee direct staff to issue an RFP for Hardware Maintenance Services and an RFP for Software Help Desk Services. Staff will evaluate proposals, rank and present their recommendations to the Committee for award of a Purchase Order for such services. SHJw JAWPDOCIFIN\CRANEIFPC.MTGWAHR.95\STAFF.RPT 4RFAHR99.42 C JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS MEETING AGENDAFOR OCTOBER 25, 1995 Agenda Item (1 1)(b)(10): FAHR95413 Consideration of Resolution No. 95-_ authorizing the establishment of a Relief Operator bonus of$.60 per hour for employees covered by the Operations and Maintenance Memorandum of Understanding. Summary The annual overtime cost to operate both treatment plants is currently about $375,000. Forty-eight percent (48%) of this total, or$180,000, is attributable to holiday coverage and is currently controlled by operating at minimum staffing levels on holidays. The remaining fifty-two percent (52%), or $195,000, is caused by employees working overtime to cover for the scheduled or unscheduled absences of other employees in an effort to meet minimum staffing requirements. Overtime costs could be further reduced through use of a relief, or floater, position that could be assigned to any vacant shift on a regular basis. A Relief Operator bonus offers an inducement to work this otherwise undesirable and unpredictable shift, which may vary from mornings one week to nights the following week. Eight such positions at both plants have the potential of reducing overtime costs by up to $100,000 annually. Staff Recommendation Establish a Relief Operator bonus of$0.60 per hour for employees covered by the Operations and Maintenance Memorandum of Understanding through a Side Letter of Agreement. FAHR Committee Recommendation to Executive Committee The Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee recommends the Executive Committee approve staff recommendation to establish a Relief Operator bonus of$0.60 per hour for employees covered by the Operations and Maintenance Memorandum of Understanding through a Side Letter of Agreement to reduce overtime costs. Executive Committee Recommendation to the Joint Boards of Directors The Executive Committee concurs with the FAHR Committee recommendation. Dwv�aesoc 11010ZVR D October 11, 1995 mm.. STAFF REPORT FAHR95-43: Operations Overtime Cost Reduction Strategy Background Overtime costs attributable to Plant Operations personnel are primarily caused by holiday coverage and both scheduled and unscheduled time off. While overtime expenditures have been reduced recently to a great extent through management of staffing levels on the various shifts, opportunities for further reduction have been identified. The annual overtime cost to operate both treatment plants is currently about $375,000, which is approximately half of what is has been in previous years. Forty-eight percent (48%) of this total, or$180,000, is attributable to holiday coverage and is currently controlled by operating at minimum staffing levels on holidays. The remaining fifty-two percent (52%), or $195,000, is caused by employees working overtime to cover for the scheduled or unscheduled absences of other employees in an effort to meet minimum staffing requirements. Staff has reached an agreement with the Operations and Maintenance bargaining group Work Issues Committee to the effect that requests for time off will only be approved if the minimum staffing level has not been reached for the shift in question. Exceptions may be made in the event of unforeseen circumstances. This strategy is largely responsible for the reduction in overtime costs from previous levels to the current $375,000. A further reduction could be realized through use of a relief, or floater, position that could be assigned to any vacant shift on a regular basis. Eight such positions at both plants have the potential of reducing overtime costs by up to $100,000 annually. A Relief Operator bonus offers an inducement to work an otherwise undesirable and unpredictable shift, which may vary from mornings one week to nights the following week. The City of Los Angeles utilizes a Relief Operator bonus of$0.60 per hour. While the Relief Operator concept is not widely used, and therefore survey data is not helpful, a figure of$0.60 per hour, or about 3 percent, would seem reasonable in light of the potential savings. The annual cost of offering this bonus to eight employees is $10,000, balanced against the potential savings of$100,000. CSDOC 0 P.O.Box 8127 0 Foanleln Val lay.CA 92728-B 127 0 Tel. (714)962.2411 0 FAX(714)062.3954 0 FAHR95-43 Page 2 October 11, 1995 Cost Implication Summary Current Total Operations Overtime Cost $ 375,000 Amount Attributable to Holidays (fixed) 180,000 Amount Attributable to employee absence 195,000 Cost to Implement Floater Concept 10,000 Potential Reduction in Overtime Costs (100,000) Projected Total Overtime with Floater 285,000 Net Potential Savings $ 90.000 Staff Recommendation Establish a Relief Operator bonus of$0.60 per hour for employees covered by the Operations and Maintenance Memoranda of Understanding through a Side Letter of Agreement. GH:Ic JNWDV.IFWCMNlIFPc.Mlt�i FAHRB'vISIAFF.RVIVWF�HR�.�l JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING OCTOBER 25, 1995 Agenda Item (14): Update re proposed acquisition of County Solid Waste Management System, and consideration of the following actions: (a) Consideration of motion authorizing staff and consultants to conduct expanded Phase I Assessment Studies on moderate and high exposure landfill sites, to be done within the previously authorized amount of $100,000.00. (b) Consideration of motion authorizing consulting services for Phase II Assessment Study to determine landfill assets and liabilities for an amount not to exceed $100,000.00. (c) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a letter of interest to enter into negotiations for the purchase of the County of Orange Solid Waste Management System; and, authorizing an amount not to exceed $100,000.00 in nonrefundable option payments to be applied toward the purchase price. u ma The Ad Hoc Committee re Landfill Issues met on October 18 for a presentation by staff and consultants on the due diligence performed to date. For detailed background information on the meeting, refer to the draft minutes included in Agenda Item (11)(a). Staff and our consultants will be presenting additional information at the meeting. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the following actions at this time: 1. Conduct expanded Phase I assessment studies on moderate and high exposure sites, which can be done within the existing $100,000 authorization. 2. Authorize an additional $100,000 to delineate Phase II Scope to determine liability. 3. Authorize the issuance of a letter of interest to enter into negotiations for the purchase of the County of Orange landfill system, including a $100,000 nonrefundable option payment that can be applied toward the purchase price. J:IWVOOPB9AGBAOCN '.< JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING OCTOBER 25, 1995 DISTRICT 2 Agenda Item (22): consideration of the following actions relative to Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2.9-Rl: (a) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing an addition of$7,398.80 to the contract with Colich Bros., Inc. dba Colich & Sons, for one item of additional work, and granting a time extension of 30 calendar days for completion of said additional work. (b) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 4 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a net deduction of$109,637.60 from the contract with Colich Bros., Inc. dba Colich & Sons. (c) Consideration of Resolution No. 95- -2, accepting said contract, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement for a final total contract amount of$2,657,809.81 (original awarded contract amount of$2,482,762.00). Summary In April 1994, the Directors approved the plans and specifications for Contract No. 2-9-R1, Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer from Imperial Highway west of Kraemer Boulevard to the intersection of Yorba Linda Boulevard and Associated Road. This sewer is used to transport wastewater collected from the collection system of the City of Fullerton to Treatment Plant No. 1. This $2.9 million project consists of a new 18-inch ductile iron pipe (DIP), 18-inch vitrified clay pipe (VCP), 21-inch VCP, 24-inch VCP and 39-inch VCP gravity sewer. The alignment starts at Yorba Linda Boulevard and Associated Road, continues northerly in Associated Road to the intersection of Associated Road and Bastenchury Road, turns easterly in Bastanchury Road to a pint west of 1-57 where it enters the Parkside Apartments complex. The sewer will be installed in an easement leading north, then turning east and connecting to an existing dry sewer under I- 57. The Alignment continues easterly in Eucalyptus Street and Gilman Park to a point of connection to the existing subtrunk sewer. Work consists of the construction of laterals, manholes, service connections, temporary bypass lines and restoration of damaged landscape. This projects designed by Post, Buckley, Schuh and Jennigan (formerly Church Engineering, Inc.) and awarded to Colich Bros., dba Colich & Sons in June 1994. This project is now complete. If the Directors approve these change orders, the total cast of the change orders to date on this contract will be $175,047.81. This represents an increase of 7.1% over the original contract amount. The changes above would have been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase. These changes resulted in a 131 calendar day extension to the contract work schedule. (3) Acceptance of Contract as Complete Colich Bros., Inc. Dba Colich & Sons has fulfilled all contractual obligations within the specified and extended time. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 3 for an addition of$7,398.80 and 30 calendar days time extension to the contract, and Change Order No. 4 for an Adjustment of Engineer's Quantities for a deduction of$109,637.60 with Colich Bros., Inc. dba Colioh & Sons, increasing the amount of change orders on this contract to $175,047.81 increasing the original contract amount of$2,482,762.00 to $2,657,809.81; and consideration of the resolution authorizing acceptance of the work as complete, execution of the final Closeout Agreement and filing of the Notice of Completion as required. DC:Idh ENGWGRRPTSZR1601.95 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING OCTOBER 25, 1995 DISTRICT 2 Agenda Item (22): Consideration of the following actions relative to Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-R1: (a) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing an addition of$7,398.80 to the contract with Colich Bros., Inc. dba Colich & Sons, for one item of additional work, and granting a time extension of 30 calendar days for completion of said additional work. (b) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 4 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a net deduction of $109,637.60 from the contract with Colich Bros., Inc. dba Colich & Sons. (c) Consideration of Resolution No. 95-_-2, accepting said contract, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement for a final total contract amount of$2,657,809.81 (original awarded contract amount of$2,482,762.00). Summary In April 1994, the Directors approved the plans and specifications for Contract No. 2.9-R1, Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer from Imperial Highway west of Kraemer Boulevard to the intersection of Yorba Linda Boulevard and Associated Road. This sewer is used to transport wastewater collected from the collection system of the City of Fullerton to Treatment Plant No. 1. This$2.9 million project consists of a new 18-inch ductile iron pipe (DIP), 18-inch vitrified Gay pipe (VCP), 21-inch VCP, 24-inch VCP and 39-inch VCP gravity sewer. The alignment starts at Yorba Linda Boulevard and Associated Road, continues northerly in Associated Road to the intersection of Associated Road and Bastenchury Road, turns easterly in Bastanchury Road to a pint west of 1.57 where it enters the Parkside Apartments complex. The sewer will be installed in an easement leading north, then turning east and connecting to an existing dry sewer under I- 57. The Alignment continues easterly in Eucalyptus Street and Gilman Park to a point of connection to the existing subtrunk sewer. Work consists of the construction of laterals, manholes, service connections, temporary bypass lines and restoration of damaged landscape. This projects designed by Post, Buckley, Schuh and Jennigan (formerly Church Engineering, Inc.) and awarded to Colich Bros., dba Colich & Sons in June 1994. This project is now complete. y The following is a summary of the contract amount: Original Contract Amount $2,482,762.00 Previously Approved Changes $ 227,286.61 Amount of Change Order No. 3 (Add)(Deduel) $ 7,398.80 Amount of Change Order No. 4 (Add)(Deduct) $ (109.637.60) Amended Contract Amount $2,657,809.81 Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 3 for one item of additional work for an additional$7,398.80, and 30 calendar days time extension, Change Order No. 4 for an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a deduction of$109,637.60; increasing the total amount of change orders on this contract to $175,047.81 and increasing the original contract amount of $2,482,762.00 to $2,657,809.81; and consideration of the resolution authorizing acceptance of the work as complete, execution of the final Close out Agreement, and file the Notice of Completion as required. J:9rpdo WVWgnpbyb100195 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ° nl ORANGE COUNTY. CAUFORNIA October 25, 1995 1a EUIS AVENUE eo cox 9+27 FOUWMNVA Ev.LAUFOMM R27Eea+E7 n+a acezA++ STAFF REPORT DISTRICT 2 Approval of Change Order Nos. 3 and 4 to the Plans and Specifications for Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-RI and Acceptance of Contract as Complete Summary In April 1994, the Directors approved the plans and specifications for Contract No. 2-9-R1, Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer from Imperial Highway west of Kraemer Boulevard to the intersection of Yorba Linda Boulevard and Associated Road. This sewer is used to transport wastewater collected from the collection system of the City of Fullerton to Treatment Plant No. 1. The $2.9 million project consists of a new 18-inch ductile iron pipe (DIP), 18-inch vitrified Gay pipe (VCP), 21-inch VCP, 24-inch VCP, 36-inch VCP and 39-inch VCP gravity sewer. The alignment starts at Yorba Linda Boulevard and Associated Road, continues northerly in Associated Road to the intersection of Associated Road and Bastanchury Road, turns easterly in Bastanchury Road to a point west of 1-57 where it enters the Parkside Apartments complex. The sewer will be installed in an easement heading north, then turning east and connecting to an existing dry sewer under 1-57. The alignment continues on the east side of 1-57 entering a second easement located on private property. The alignment continues easterly in Eucalyptus Street and Gilman Park to a point of connection to the existing subtrunk sewer. Work consists of the construction of laterals, manholes, service connections, temporary bypass lines and restoration of damaged landscape. (1) Change Order No. 3 Change Order No. 3 is a net addition of$7,398.80 to the contract for one item of added work and 30 calendar days. This project was designed by Post, Buckley, Schuh and Jennigan (formerly Church Engineering, Inc.) and awarded to Colich Bros., Inc. dba Colich &Sons in June 1994. Item 1, in the amount of$7,398.80 and 30 calendar days time extension, was for restoration of Gilman Park in agreement with the City of Fullerton. The wording of the construction notes as presented by the designer did not completely explain what must be done with the grassy areas conceming the amount and type of turf restoration after the pipe laying operations were completed. All parties involved had a different interpretation of what was required. The Contractor shared in one half of the costs with the Districts. (2) Change Order No. 4 Change Order No. 4 is the Adjustment of Engineer's Quantities for a net deduction of $109,637.60. 1 If the Directors approve these change orders, the total cost of the change orders to date on this contract will be $175,047.81. This represents an increase of 7.1% over the original contract amount. The changes above would have been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase. These changes resulted in a 131 calendar day extension to the contract work schedule. (3) Acceptance of Contract as Complete Colich Bros., Inc. Dba Colich & Sons has fulfilled all contractual obligations within the specified and extended time. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 3 for an addition of$7,398.80 and 30 calendar days time extension to the contract, and Change Order No. 4 for an Adjustment of Engineer's Quantities for a deduction of$109,637.60 with Colich Bros., Inc. dba Colich & Sons, increasing the amount of change orders on this contract to $175,047.81 increasing the original contract amount of$2,482,762.00 to$2,657,809.81; and consideration of the resolution authorizing acceptance of the work as complete, execution of the final Closeout Agreement and filing of the Notice of Completion as required. DC:Idh ENGIMGRRPTSZR10-01.95 W Page 1 of 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 108U ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Colich Bros. Inc. dba Colich &Sons C.O. No.: Three (3) Dale: October 25, 1995 Job: Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-R1 Consultant: Post, Buckley. Schuh and Jenniean (formerly Church Engineering Inc.) Amount of this Change Order(Add)(Dednet) $ 7,398.80 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes In the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 -RESTORATION OF GILMAN PARK The contract required the placement of 18Jnch VCP (Vitrified Clay Pipe)sewer through the entire length of Gilman Park, City of Fullerton. The wording of the construction notes as presented by the designer did not completely explain what must be done with the grassy areas concerning the amount and type of turf restoration after the pipe laying operations were completed. All parties involved (City of Fullerton,Contractor and Districts) had a different interpretation of what was required. Also in question was proper grade around manholes that extended above ground level 18-4nches and the grading for proper drainage. The Districts entered into an agreement w8h the City to resolve the issues and provide a safe area for the public. Fill material was placed around the manholes and graded with long slopes,a Swale was graded for better drainage,2 inches of top soil was placed to cover rocky areas and the entire area hydro-seeded with natural grasses. The Contractor agreed to share the total cost of$14,797.61 with the Districts on a negotiated basis in accordance with Section 10a(8)(2)(a). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER REM: $7,398.80 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 30 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $7,398.80 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 30 Calendar Days V Page 2 of 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX$127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728.8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Colich Bros. Inc. dba Colich & Sons C.O. No.: Three (3) Date: October 25 1995 Job: Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-R1 Consultant: Post, Buckley. Schuh and Jennigan (formerly Church Engineering, Inc.) The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 30 days extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approve by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: June 30, 1994 Original Contract Time: 180 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: December 27, 1994 Time Extension this C.O.: 30 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 131 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 311 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: November 2, 1995 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Original Contract Price $2,482,762.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 277,286.61 This Change (Add) (Bednef) $ 7,398.80 Amended Contract Price $2,767,447.41 w Page 3 of 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Colich Bros. Inc. dba Colich &Sons C.O. No.: Three (3) Date: October 25, 1995 Job: Rehabilitation of Cvoress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-R1 Consultant: Post, Buckley Schuh and Jernigan (formerly Church Engineering, Inc.) Board Authorization Date: October 25, 1995 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SubMitted by: _ Re rnrn ded by: -Z7 - ys 'Engineering Manager Date g6nstruction Manager Date pro ie Approved a io Fonn: Director of Engineering Date G ne I Counsel Date Accepted by: �COUCH BROS., INC. dba Colich &Sons Contractor Dale Page 1 of 4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Colich Bros., Inc. Dba Colich 8 Sons C.O. No.: Four(4)1 Date: October 25, 1995 Job: Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-R1 Consultant: Post, Buckley. Schuh and Jennigan (formerly Church Engineering, Inc.) Amount of this Change Order(Add)(Deduct) $(109,637.60) In accordance with contract provisions, the fallowing changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 -ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S QUANTITIES ADD: Change in Quantity Item No. Unit Description From To Difference Unit Price Total 15. V. F. 72-inch Concrete 81.00 89.50 8.50 $561.00 4,768.50 Manhole Subtotal: $ 4,768.50 DEDUCT: Change in Quantity Item No. Unit Description From To Difference Unit Price Total 12. E.A. 8x14 Concrete W. 1.00 0.00 1.00 $22,500.00 $(22,500.00) 13. V. F. 844nch Concrete 69.00 33.30 35.70 $ 835.00 $(29,809.50) Manhole 17. V. F. 604nch Concrete 238.00 213.30 24.70 $ 573.00 $(14,153.10) Manhole 18. V. F. 604nch Concrete 17.00 15.50 1.50 $ 729.00 $( 1,093.50) Drop Manhole 27. EA. Remove exist.84- 1.00 0.00 1.00 $2,500.00 $(2,500.00) Inch Concrete Manhole 33. C.Y. Concrete Encas. 150.00 132.00 18.00 $ 75.00 $( 1,350.00) 43. C.Y. Crushed Rock 1000.00 0.00 1000.00 $ 20.00 $(20,000.00) 0 to 12 inches v Page 2 of 4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Colich Bros., Inc. Dba Colich & Sons C.O. No.; Four(4)) Date: October 25, 1995 Job: Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Sublrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-Rl Consultant: Post Buckley. Schuh and Jennigan (fonnedy Church Engineering, Inc.) ITEM 1 -ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S QUANTITIES(con8nued) 44. C.Y. Crushed Rock 500.00 0.00 500.00 $ 22.00 $(11,000.00) 12 to 24 inches 45. C.Y. Crushed Rock 500.00 0.00 500.00 $ 24.00 $(12,000.00) Subtotal $(114,406.10) CREDIT COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $(114,406.10) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL CREDIT COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $(109,637.60) TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days l o Page 3 of 4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Colich Bros., Inc. Dba Colich & Sons C.O. No.: Four(4)1 Date: October 25, 1995 Job: Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer Contract No. 2-9-R1 Consultant: post Buckley Schuh and Jennigan (formerly Church Engineering Inc.) The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed Incidental to the prime work and within the time within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time for this Change Order,and no direct or indirect,Incidental or consequential costs,expenses,losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor,except, as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: June 30, 1994 Original Contract Time: 180 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: December 27, 1994 Time Extension this C.O.: 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 131 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 311 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: Novbember 2, 1995 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Original Contract Price $2,482,762.00 Prev.Authorized Changes $ 284,685.41 This Change(Add) (Deduct) $ (109,637,601 Amended Contract Price $2,657 809.81 1 a Page 4 of 4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Colich Bros., Inc. Oba Colich & Sons C.O. No.: Four(4)) Date: October 25. 1995 Job: Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtmnk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-R1 Consultant: Post, Buckley. Schuh and Jennigan (formedy Church Engineering, Inc.) Board Authorization Date:October 25, 1995 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA Sub i8ed by: / �y e t t ended by— l/ Li-1-s gineedng Manager Date Pbnalruclion M stager Date ppra e y Appr�r tlarqt Form: hector o Engineenng Date Genera W ounsel Date Accepted by: COUCH BROS.INC.,dba COUCH &SONS 2 v1--% S Contractor ate u g JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING OCTOBER 25, 1995 DISTRICTS 6. 7. and 14 Agenda Item (29): consideration of the following actions relative to Baker- Gisler Interceptor,from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-1A: (a) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing an addition of$39,734.90 to the contract with Mladen Buntich Construction Co., Inc., for five items of additional work, and granting a time extension of 33 calendar days for completion of said additional work. (b) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 4 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing of$209,090.78 to the contract with Mladen Buntich Construction Co., Inc. for nine items of additional work, and granting a time extension of 39 calendar days for completion of said additional work. (c) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 5 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a net addition of $36,059.00 to the contract with Mladen Buntich Construction Co., Inc. (d) Consideration of Resolution No. 95- , accepting said contract as complete, authorizing execution of Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement for a final total contract amount of$8,810,715.81 (original awarded contract amount of$8,278,963.00). Summary This$8.27 million project, located within the City of Costa Mesa between Fairview Road at Baker Street and the Santa Ana River, was designed by Boyle Engineering Corporation and provides for the construction of a 90-inch reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) sewer, approximately 10,500 feet long and 760 feet of 6' x 8' reinforced concrete box sewer through Mesa Verde Country Club (MVCC), 1000-feet of 33-inch VCP. Since the formation of County Sanitation District No. 14, Sanitation Districts Nos. 6, 7, and 14 have been working towards the completion of a joint conveyance system that will deliver wastewater from the communities of Irvine, Costa Mesa, and Santa Ana to the Fountain Valley Reclamation Plant No. 1. To date, four of the six construction contracts (from Bristol Street to Fairview Road, Contract No. 14-1-13; Main Street to Bristol Street, Contract No. 14-1-2; and two in the vicinity of the Santa Ana River, Contract Nos. 14-1-1A-1 and 14-1-tA-2) have been completed. v S The two remaining projects include this contract, Contact No. 14-1-1A which is scheduled to be completed by September 1995 and a future District No. 6 collector, Contract No. 6-12 extending southerly in Fairview Road from the Paularino Channel just south of Baker Street to Wilson Street. Design for Contract No. 6-12 is essentially complete, and is scheduled for construction sometime in 1996. Change Order No. 3, is an addition of$39,734.90 to the contract for six items of additional work and a thirty-three day time extension. Change Order No. 4 is an addition of$209,090.78 to the contract for nine items of additional work and a thirty-nine calendar day time extension. Change Order No. 5 is the Adjustment of Engineer's quantities for an increase of$36,059.00. This contract was awarded on February 2, 1994 to Mladen Buntich Construction Co., Inc. The following is a summary of the contract amount: Original Contract Amount $8,278,983.00 Previously Approved Changes $ 246,848.13 Amount of Change Order No. 3 (Add)(Dedus $ 39,734.90 Amount of Change Order No. 4 (Add)(9educt) $ 209,090.78 Amount of Change Order No. 5 (Add)(DeducF) $ 36,059.00 Amended Contract Amount $8,810,715.81 Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 3 for six items of additional work for an additional $39,734.90, and 33 calendar days time extension, Change Order No. 4 for nine items of additional work for an additional $209,090.78 and 39 Calendar days time extension, and Change Order No. 5 for an adjustment of engineer's quantities for an additional $36,059.00 ; increasing the total amount of change orders on this contract to$531,732.81 and increasing the original contract amount of$8,278,983.00 to $8,810,715.81; and consideration of the resolution authorizing acceptance of the work as complete, execution of the final Close out Agreement, and file the Notice of Completion as required. J:twP00C1aS1A G95W CTMl429.WP0 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS i FI ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA October 25, 1995 1084A ELUS AVENUE F0.BOX 0127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA U729.8127 11tne82-2411 STAFF REPORT Proposed Chance Order Nos. 3. 4 and 5 to the Plans and Specifications Faker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1 Contract No. 14-1-1A And Acceptance of the Contract as Complete Summary This$8.27 million project, located within the City of Costa Mesa between Fairview Road at Baker Street and the Santa Ana River,was designed by Boyle Engineering Corporation and provides for the construction of a 90-inch reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) sewer, approximately 10,500 feet long and 760 feel of 6'x 8' reinforced concrete box sewer through Mesa Verde Country Club (MVCC). Since the formation of County Sanitation District No. 14, Sanitation Districts Nos. 6, 7, and 14 have been working towards the completion of a joint conveyance system that will deliver wastewater from the communities of Irvine, Costa Mesa, and Santa Ana to the Fountain Valley Reclamation Plant No. 1. To date, four of the six construction contract (from Bristol Street to Fairview Road, Contract No. 14-1-1 B; Main Street to Bristol Street, Contract No. 14-1-2; and two in the vicinity of the Santa Ana River, Contract Nos. 14-1-1A-1 and 14-1-1A-2) have been completed. The two remaining projects include this contract, Contract No. 14-1-1A which is scheduled to be completed by September 1995 and a future District 6 collector, Contract No. 6-12 extending southerly in Fairview Road from the Paularino Channel just south of Baker Street to Wilson Street. Design for Contract No. 6-12 is essentially complete, and is scheduled for construction sometime in 1996. This contract was awarded on February 2, 1994 to Mladen Buntich Construction Company, Inc. (1) Chance Order No. 3 Change Order No. 3 is a net amount of$39,734.90 to the contract for six items of added work and thirty three calendar days. This project was designed by Boyle Engineering Corporation and awarded to Mladen Buntich Construction Company, Inc. In February 1994. Item 1, in the amount of$11,583.00 is for the use of security guard at the gate entrance to Plant No. 1 along Garfield Avenue during hauling operations. Construction staff was directed to use a guard by the Safety and Health Department for security reasons. This was an ongoing requirement throughout the entire hauling time frame for excavating materials that were either stored or used for blending and then hauled to work site for backfill. Item 2, in the amount of$12,357.94 is for slurry work at various street locations that were requested by the City of Costa Mesa. Item 3, in the amount of$1,736.42 and 1 calendar day is for modification and reconnection of an existing sewer lateral that was not shown on the contract drawings. Item 4, in the amount of$6,057.54 and 3 calendar days is for the installation of special ductile , ironfdting that was required to avoid a utility conflict. The as-built drawings did not accurately show the profile of the 12-inch water line. Item 5, in the amount of$8,000.00 and 3 calendar days is for the removal of a temporary 24- inch ductile iron bypass and the tie-in of an existing 8-inch VCP through a manhole cone section that was removed. This work was done to accommodate the City of Costa Mesa's Orange County Fair schedule which forced the Contractor to demobilize prior to the completion of his scheduled work. Item 6, is for a time extension of 26 calendar days for delays imposed on the Contractor to accommodated the City of Costa Mesa's fair schedule. Items 3 and 4 are design errors related to contract drawings that failed to correctly incorporate in existing as-built information. This is due in part to insufficient as-built information provided by other agencies and utilities. Items 1 and 2 are for changes that would have been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase. Item 5 was for an unforseen condition (local agency requirement)which would have been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase. (2) Change Order No. 4 Change Order No. 4 is a net amount of$209,090.78 to the contract for nine items of added work and 39 calendar days. Item 1, in the amount of$5,130.86 and one calendar day is for a utility conflict with a 21-inch storm drain lateral not shown on the contract drawings. Item 2, in the amount of$19,512.75 and 3 calendar days is for a change in the method of construction (e.g. use of a sand cement slurry for backfill and maintaining access to both Taco Bell driveways simultaneously for ingress and egress) as requested by both Taco Bell and the City of Costa Mesa. Item 3, in the amount of$24,800.00 and 6 calendar days is for the installation of two new 64 inch manholes that were not included in the schedule of prices as a bid item. Contract documents provided payment for 48-inch, 78-inch and 84-inch manholes only. Item 4, in the amount of$1,550.11 and one calendar day is for construction delays incurred due to damage to three PVC irrigation lines not disclosed on the contract documents. Item 5, in the amount of$45,000.00 and 16 calendar days is for premature demobilization costs and remobilization costs incurred to accommodate Orange County Fair schedule. The majority of the extra costs are for unabsorbed overhead. Item 6, in the amount of$96,000.00 and 12 calendar days is for the additional hauling costs associated with excess fill material that was not used on the Mesa Verde Country Club property (sixth hole). Mesa Verde Country Club revised their rough grading plan requirements after award of the contract. Item 7, in the amount of$7,237.67 is for additional permanent striping required by the City of Costa Mesa which was outside the contract scope of work. Item 8, in the amount of$6,859.39 and 3 calendar days is for the reconnection of a 6-inch VCP service lateral from an existing manhole on a 27-inch VCP line to be abandoned and lie it into an existing manhole on a 15-inch VCP line. This lateral was not shown on the contract drawings. Item 9, in the amount of$3,000.00 and one calendar day is for the repair of a damaged telephone conduit that was not properly indicated on the contract document. Items 1, 4, 8 and 9 are for design errors related to the contract drawings that failed to correctly incorporate existing as-built information. This is due in part to insufficient as-built information provided by other agencies and/or utilities. Items 2 and 5 were for unforseen conditions (local agency requirements)which could have been included in the original design if known or discovered in the design phase. Items 3, 6, and 7 are for changes that would have been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase. (3) Chance Order No. 5 Change Order No. 5 is the Adjustment of Engineer's Quantities for a net increase of$36,059.00. If the Directors approve these change orders, the total cost of the change orders to date on this contract will be $531,732.81. This represents an increase of 6.14% over the original contract amount. These changes resulted in a 147 calendar day time extension to the contract work schedule. (4) Acceptance of the Contract as Complete Mladen Buntich Construction Company, Inc. has fulfilled all contractual obligations within the specified and extended time. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 3 for an addition of$39,734.90 and 33 calendar days time extension to the contract, Change Order No. 4 for an addition of $209,090.78 and 39 calendar days time extension to the contract and Change Order No. 5 for an Adjustment of Engineer's Quantities for an increase of$36,059.00 with Malden Buntich Construction Company, Inc. Increasing the amount of change orders on this contract to $531,732.81, increasing the original contract amount of$8,278,983.00 to $8,810,715.81 and consideration of the resolution authorizing acceptance of the work as complete, execution of the final closeout agreement and filing of the Notice of Completion as required. wg0ngrrpWzr1002.95 Page 1 of 5 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Mladen Buntich Construction Co., Inc C.O. No.: Three (3) Date: October 25, 1995 Job: Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-1A Consultant: Boyle Engineering Corooration Amount of this Change Order(Add)(Beduct) $ 39,734.90 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 -USE OF SECURITY GUARD AT PLANT NO. 1 SOUTH ENTRANCE The Contractor via Staff was directed by the Safety and Health Department to provide a security guard at the gate entrance along Garfield Avenue (southeast comer) on an as needed basis during dirt hauling operations. This item is a continuation of Item 9, Change Order No. 1. Per contract documents, the Contractor was allocated a three-acre site on Districts's Plant No. 1 property for storage and blending of dirt for backfill. The time frame covered by this item was between November 1, 1994 through July 30, 1995. This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO#6) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $11,583.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 2- SLURRY SEAL AT VARIOUS STREET LOCATIONS The Contractor was directed to slurry seal street areas that had been removed and replaced and had bad spots or scratches. The total slurry seal footage was approximately 296,530 square feet. Gisler Avenue which had significant street repairs represented nearly 80% of the total slurry scope. There was a 50% -50% cost participation agreement between the Contractor and the Districts for Gisler . Avenue between Washington Avenue and Cinnamon Avenue. The balance of the areas to be slurried were the exclusive responsibility of either the District or the Contractor. The invoice unit price for the one coat Type II road slurry seal was 7.5 cents per square foot, which included traffic control. The City of Costa Mesa identified and directed specific areas to be slurried. This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $12,357.94 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days r Page 2 of 5 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Mladen Suntich Construction Co.. Inc C.O. No.: Three (3) Date: October 25, 1995 Job: Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-IA Consultant: Boyle Engineering Corporation ITEM 3 - MODIFICATION OF EXISTING SEWER LATERALS The Contractor was directed to modify an existing 6-inch PVC sewer lateral at Station 110+90 that was not shown on the contract drawings. The line had to be cut just outside the trench zone to allow for placement of soldier beams for shoring. After the 90-inch RCP joint sections were installed, a new 8-foot section of 6-inch PVC had to be reinstalled and connected to an existing 8-inch line. This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 1l)-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 8 1,736.42 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 1 Calendar Day ITEM 4- UTILITY CONFLICT WITH EXISTING 12-INCH WATERLINE AND STORM DRAIN LATERAL AT THE PAULARINO CHANNEL AREA The Contractor was directed to use a special ductile iron pipe fitting with a 22 114 degree bend to achieve the deflection required to avoid a conflict with an existing 12-inch CML (concrete mortar lined) and CSP (coated steel pipe) Mesa Consolidated waterline. This waterline had a drop section that was designed to transition below an existing 7-feet x 4 1/2 feet storm drain and this was not shown on the plans. After potholing and exposing the above referenced 12-inch line, it was determined that the design grade for the 21-feet of 24-inch VCP that was to be installed between the two new manholes in the area (Station No. 8+79 to 8+97.50) could not be achieved with standard 6-foot joints. Initially, Staff proposed using special VCP mitered joints to avoid the conflict, but further excavation uncovered an unmarked 24-inch RCP storm drain lateral that forced the Contractor to use the aforementioned 22 1/4 ductile iron pipe fitting. In addition, the Contractor was directed to use slurry to encase the ductile iron pipe to achieve additional lateral support. This Rem was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(8)(2)(b) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 6,057.54 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM : 3 Calendar Days Page 3 of 5 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 EWS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Mladen Buntich Construction Co.. Inc C.O. No.: Three (3) Date: October 25, 1995 Job: Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-1A Consultant: Boyle Ennineering Corporation ITEM 5- REMOVAL OF THE TEMPORARY 24-INCH DUCTILE IRON BYPASS AND INSTALLATION OF 8-INCH VCP THROUGH EXISTING MANHOLE SHAFT The Contractor was directed to remove a 30-foot temporary 24-inch ductile iron bypass and install an 8-inch VCP through the cone area of an existing manhole that was removed (Station No. 143+15). At the fime of the bypass installation for the existing 30-inch VCP crossing the trench of the new 90-inch RCP, its removal was contingent upon the completion of all tie-ins at the Paulanno Channel (Station No. 8+79). Prior to completing these tie-ins, the Contractor was directed to abide by scheduling constraints imposed by the City of Costa Mesa to accommodate the Orange County Fair schedule. All open excavations had to be backfilled and resurfaced, temporary traffic detour striping was removed and permanent stripping was installed. This hem of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $8,000.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 3 Calendar Days ITEM 6 -TIME EXTENSION Pursuant to the contract documents, the Contractor is entitled to be granted time extensions to the contract for delays that have been contributed to on the part of the Districts. Due to a City of Costa Mesa request to cease all construction on Fairview and Baker to accommodate the Orange County Fair schedule, the Contractor was forced to demobilize and remobilize between July 6, 1995 and July 31, 1995. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)(2)(a) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $0.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 26 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $39,734.90 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 33 Calendar Days Page 4 of 5 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Mladen Buntich Construction Co.. Inc C.O. No.: Three (3) Date: October 25, 1995 Job: Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1. Contract No. 14-1-1A Consultant: Boyle Enoineerino Corooration The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 33 day extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approve by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: February 2, 1994 Original Contract Time: 480 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: May 27, 1995 Time Extension this C.O.: 33 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 108 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 588 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: September 12. 1995 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 8,278,983.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 246,848.13 This Change (Add) (Beduet) $ 39,734.90 Amended Contract Price $ 8,565,566.03 Page 5 of 5 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Mladen Bunlich Construction Co.. Inc C.O. No.: Three (3) Date: October 25, 1995 Job: Baker-Gisler Interceptor. from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1. Contract No. 14-1-1A Consultant: Boyle Engineering Corporation Board authorization Date: September 27, 1995 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Submitter by: �L Re ended by: gineering Manager Date Wristruction Manager Date pro ed Approved as f Form: o-Io- r d a Director of Engineering Date Gene I MUK'N Date Accepted by: MLA,/ EN�BUU,,NTICH CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. � Contractor Aate Page 1 of 7 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Mladen Buntich Construction Co.. Inc C.O. No.: Four(4) Date: October 25, 1995 Job: Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1 Contract No. 14-1-1A Consultant: Boyle Engineering Corporation Amount of this Change Order (Add)(Dedue!) $ 209,090.78 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes In the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 -UTILITY CONFLICT WITH EXISTING 21-INCH RCP STORM DRAIN Contractor was directed to hand dig around an existing 21inch storm drain that was not shown on the contract documents during the installation of a 214nch VCP line between a new manhole at Station 8+80.50 and to a bein point for an existing 21-inch VCP located in the EMA right-of-way area. After hand digging was completed, Contractor backfilled the trench with a sand cement slurry, because of the space limitations for mechanical compaction. This Rem of work was accomplished by Contractors force amount pursuant to Section 16E(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $5,130.86 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 1 Calendar Day ITEM 2 - EXTRA WORK PERFORMED IN FRONT OF TACO BELL ON FAIRVIEW TO MAINTAIN ACCESS ON FAIRVIEW TO MAINTAIN ACCESS DURING CONSTRUCTION Contractor was directed to maintain simultaneous access to Taco Bell entrance and exit during construction of 33"VCP on Fairview near the Paularino Channel. Plans and specifications call for one driveway to remain open at all times. Due to the amount of vehicular traffic at Taw Bell, and the inability of its drive thru to operate with only one open driveway, the City of Costa Mesa and the Taco Bell management requested the Districts express cooperation in this matter. The Contractorwas directed to change his method of construction, thereby maintaining access to both driveways. Contractor used additional gagmen, dumptrucks without trailers, and an excavator to lay the VCP. In addition, the Contractor was directed to backfill with a 1 sack sand cement slurry to minimize construction traffic in from of Taw Bell and to haul away additional displaced material. This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's form account pursuant to Section 10-6(8)2(b) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $19,512.75 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 3 Calendar Days Page 2 of 7 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Mladen Buntich Construction Co.. Inc C.O. No.: Four(41 Date: October 25, 1995 Job: Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1. Contract No. 14-1-1A Consultant: Boyle Enaineering Corporation ITEM 3- INSTALLATION OF TWO 60-INCH MANHOLES IN EMA RIGHT-OF-WAY Contractor was directed to install two new 60-inch manholes as shown on contract Drawing Sht. 30 of 51. These manholes were installed on a force account basis due to the fact that the schedule of prices did not provide a bid item for this scope of work. Drawing No. 30 is titled "Abandonment of Trunk Sewer", which would be part of the scope of work for bid item No. 20 which includes the abandonment of manholes. As stated above, no reference was made to the installation of the subject two new 60- inch manholes. In addition, the Contractor was directed to build two 2-feet, 21-inch stubouts with Caulder couplings on each side of a new manhole along with one 4-foot make-up piece over an existing 21-inch VCP line. The dry 21-inch VCP line, (Station 11+51.02, Contract 6-11) that was to be tied into the new manhole had to be modified accordingly. This item of work was accomplished by Contractors force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $24,800.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 6 Calendar Days ITEM 4- CONSTRUCTION DELAY FOR DAMAGE TO IRRIGATION LINES NOT SHOWN ON CONTRACT DOCUMENTS During the installation of the 90-inch RCP interceptor at the south entrance to the Sanwa Bank property the Contractor damaged a set of irrigation lines that were not shown on the contract drawings. As a result of the water line break the Contractors trench flooded out and his crews were delayed while securing the trench. This item of work was accomplished by Contractors force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $1,550.11 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM : 1Calendar Day Page 3 of 7 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 108"ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Mladen Buntich Construction Co.. Inc C.O. No.: Four(4) Date: October 25, 1995 Job: Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-1A Consultant: Boyle Engineering Corooration ITEM 5- DEMOBILIZATION AND REMOBILIZATION COSTS INCURRED TO ACCOMMODATE ORANGE COUNTY FAIR SCHEDULE The City of Costa Mesa requested that the District's Contractor cease all construction activities on Fairview and Baker to minimize traffic disruption during the Orange County Fair between July 6, 1995 and July 23, 1995. As a result the Contractor incurred demobilization and remobilization costs by being forced to secure all trenches prior to completing all required contract work. To meet the July 6, 1995 start date deadline, the Contractor began backfilling, installed traffic loop wiring, paved and re-striped for approximately two weeks prior to the fair starting date of July 7, 1995. The majority of extra costs incurred by the Contractor are for unabsorbed home office overhead with the balance for items such as trailer and yard rental, standby cost for equipment, and for demobilization and remobilization costs for manpower and equipment. The balance of the time extension for this item was included in Change Order No. 2, Item 7 (26 Calendar Days). This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $45,000.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 16 Calendar Days ITEM 6 -ADDITIONAL EXPORT OF FILL MATERIAL NOT REQUIRED FOR ROUGH GRADING AT MESA VERDE COUNTRY CLUB PROPERTY(SIXTH HOLE) The contract documents stated that the Contractor was to deliver 23,000 cubic yards of excess excavated material from other locations along the project to the 6th hole of the Mesa Verde County Club property for rough grading requirements, (Reference: Sheet 37 of the plan documents). After the contract was bid, staff determined that the final rough grading contours had been revised. At the completion of the rough grading and re-seeding work for the golf course, staff performed a final survey to ascertain the actual earthwork grading volume to be 16,728 cubic yards of fill. Therefore, approximately 7,600 cubic yards (including expansion factor) of excess material had to be permanently removed from the project. Contractors additional haul-off costs consisted of transport costs to haul off excess fill material directly off the project, trahsport costs to haul and stockpile material at Plant No. 1 blending and mixing site, and extra costs to load and haul excess material from Plant No. 1 to a permanent site, representing approximately two hours per load for hauling cost, including equipment loading costs. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a)of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $96,000.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 12 Calendar Days Page 4 of 7 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Mladen Buntich Construction Co.. Inc C.O. No.: Four(4) Date: October 25, 1995 Job: Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1. Contract No. 14-1-1A Consultant: Boyle Engineering Corporation ITEM 7 - ADDITIONAL PERMANENT STRIPING REQUIRED ON GISLER AVENUE, BAKER STREET AND HARBOR BOULEVARD At the conclusion of the Contractor's paving and slurry scope of work, the City of Cost Mesa released their final permanent striping plans to District's staff. After a review of these plans, it was determined there was a change of condition as opposed to a restoration of all damaged striping to its original configuration. The extra costs incurred by the Contractor consisted of the following: 6-inch bike lane striping with legends, 4-inch white edge lines, and minor miscellaneous items. For the replacement permanent striping (restoration to original configuration) the District staff negotiated an agreement to absorb 25% of these costs with the Contractor incurring the balance of the costs, or 75%. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Seection 10.6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $7,237.67 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 8- RECONNECTION OF A 6-INCH VCP SERVICE LATERAL FROM AN EXISTING MANHOLE TO BE ABANDONED TO AN EXISTING 15-INCH VCP LINE On Baker Street, approximately 100-feet east of Fairview Road, the Contractor was performing abandonment work in place for the scope of work defined by bid item No. 20. At this location a 6-inch VCP lateral service connection was found in a manhole on an existing 27-inch VCP line to be abandoned. This service lateral was not shown on the contract documents. The Contractor was directed to disconnect the 6-inch lateral from the existing manhole and tie-in the lateral into an adjacent 15-inch VCP line via core drilling. After completing the tie-in the Contractor backfilled around the manhole and placed an asphalt cap, and re-channeled an existing City manhole to maintain proper flow between the City and District's facilities. This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $6,859.39 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 3 Calendar Days Page 5 of 7 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 EWS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9272MI27 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Mladen Buntich Construction Co.. Inc C.O. No.: Four (4) Date: October 25. 1995 Job: Baker-Gisler Interceptor. from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-1A Consultant: Boyle Engineering Corporation ITEM 9 - REPAIR OF DAMAGED TELEPHONE CONDUIT At approximate Station 82+70, the Contractor damaged a Pacific Bell Telephone conduit while excavating for the 90-inch RCP installation. The profile of the contract documents showed one conduit, but a second conduit (which was damaged)was not shown on the plans nor was it indicated by USA markings in the field. Pacific Bell did not properly mark their lines nor did they indicate the number of conduits present per Section 4216.2 of the USA, California one call law. The majority of the costs for this change order item is for the reimbursement of an invoice from Pacific Bell for repairs to the subject second conduit. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10.6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $3,000.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 1 Calendar Day TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $209,090.78 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 39 Calendar Days Page 6 of 7 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Mladen Buntich Construction Co.. Inc C.O. No.: Four(4) Date: October 25 1995 Job: Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1. Contract No. 14-1-1A Consultant: Boyle Engineering Corporation The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 39 day extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approve by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: February 2, 1994 Original Contract Time: 480 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: May 27, 1995 Time Extension this C.O.: 39 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 147 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 627 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: October 21, 1995 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 8,278,983.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 286,583.03 This Change (Add) (Bednet) $ 209,090.78 Amended Contract Price $ 8,774,656.81 Page 7 of 7 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 108"EUJS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CAUFORNIA 927284127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Mladen Buntich Construction Co.. Inc C.O. No.: Four(4) Date: October 25. 1995 Job: Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1. Contract No, 14-1-1A Consultant: Boyle Enaineerina Corporation Board authorization Date: October 25, 1995 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY,CAUFORNIA Submitted by. Re mended by: .art A)1v4-S �f to-9--pr ngineering Manager 'Date06nstruction Manager Date A v d y!'r.� Ap ved a o Form: �( !/ Q /o-basis Director of Engineering Date Gene Counsel Date Accepted by. M EN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. o Day Contractor ate e Page 1 of 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 108"ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9272"127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Mladen Buntich Construction Co.. Inc. C.O. No.: Five (5)) Date: October 25, 1995 Job: Baker-Gisler Interceptor from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1. Contract No. 14-1-1A Consultant: Boyle Engineering Corooration Amount of this Change Order(Add)(Deduet) $36,059.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 -ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S QUANTITIES ADD: Change in Quantity Item No. Unit Description From To Difference Und Price Total 12. V.F. 724nch Concrete 73.00 128.67 55.67 $1100.00 $61,237.00 Manhole SUBTOTAL: $61,237.00 DEDUCT: Change in Quantity Item No. Unit Description From TO Difference Unit Price Total it. V. F. 84-inch Concrete 391.00 374.36 16.64 $ 950.00 $(15,808.00) Manhole 13. V.F. 484nch Concrete 94.00 92.10 1.90 $ 300.00 $( 570.00) Manhole 29. C.Y. Crushed Rock 500.00 390.00 110.00 $ 20.00 $( 2,200.00) 0- 12 Inches 30. C.Y. Crushed Rock 500.00 200.00 300.00 $ 22.00 $( 6,600.00) SUBTOTAL: $(25,178.00) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $36,059.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $36,059.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days e Page 2 of 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Mladen Buntich Construction Co.. Inc. C.O. No.: Five (5)1 Dale: October 25, 1995 Job: Baker-Gisler Interceptor from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1. Contract No. 14-1-1A Consultant: Boyle Enoineerino Corporation The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed Incidental to the prime work and within the time within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. it is therefore mutually agreed that no time for this Change Order,and no direct or indirect,Incidental or consequential costs,expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor,except,as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: Febmary 2, 1994 Original Contract Time: 480 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: May 27, 1995 Time Extension this C.O.: 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 147 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 627 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: October 21, 1995 Tme Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Original Contract Price $8,278,983.00 Prev.Authorized Changes $ 495,673.81 This Change (Add)(Deduct) $ 36,059.00 Amended Contract Pdce $8,810,715.81 Page 3 of 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Mladen Buntich Construction Co.. Inc. C.O. No.: Five (5)) Date: October 25. 1995 Job: Baker-Gisler Interceptor from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1. Contract No. 14-1-1A Consultant: Boyle Enaineerina Corooration Board Authorization Date:October 25,1995 COUNTY SAWATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA Submitt@d by: Rec9lipmanded by: elf q D {. /o-r 9s ngineering Manager Date C nstrucdon Manager Date pro ad Approve to Fo : • Al is yf oQ � Director of Engineering Date General Co Cov"w Date Accepted by: MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. Date' o Contractor SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 REGULAR MEETING OCTOBER 25, 1995 -7:30 P.M. In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the Districts'Administrative Offices not less I than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each [ agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Committee for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an emergency item or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the I attention of the Committee subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a i I supplemental agenda posted in the manner as above, not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. (17) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any: (a) Consideration of motion authorizing consideration of Item (17)(c) listed below which arose subsequent to the posting of the agenda and which requires action at this time pursuant to authority of Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(2). (b) Verbal report of General Counsel (c) Consideration of motion to receive and file Summons and Complaint for Inverse Condemnation, Edward T. Reid vs. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 752065, in connection with the Santa Ana River widening project with the County of Orange, and authorize the Districts' General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the Districts. J:WJPDO WW3951sklo JOINT CHAIRMAN'S REPORT JOINT BOARD MEETING OF OCTOBER 25, 1995 1 . THE CASA FALL TECHNICAL MEETING IS SCHEDULED FOR NOVEMBER 16TH AND 17TH IN IRVINE AT THE HYATT REGENCY. IF YOU PLAN TO ATTEND, PLEASE LET JEAN, THE GENERAL MANAGER'S SECRETARY, KNOW NO LATER THAN NOVEMBER 1 . 2. FOR THOSE WHO WERE UNABLE TO ATTEND THE LAST TOUR OF PLANT 2, THERE IS ANOTHER ONE SCHEDULED FOR SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 18. IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO ATTEND, PLEASE CONTACT CLARICE MARCIN, THE OMTS COMMITTEE SECRETARY. 3. THE MEETINGS SCHEDULED FOR NOVEMBER ARE: A. THE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE ON WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 1 AT 5:30 P.M. B. PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE ON THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 2 AT 5 P.M. WE WILL BE MEETING AT THE OPERATIONS CENTER AT PLANT 2 FOR A TOUR, FOLLOWED BY A LIGHT DINNER AND THE MEETING IN THE TRAINING ROOM OF THE OPERATIONS CENTER. C. THE FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE WILL MEET ON WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 8 AT 5:30 P.M. DINNER WILL FOLLOW THIS MEETING. D. THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE WILL ALSO MEET ON WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 8 AT 7 P.M. DINNER WILL BE SERVED AT 6:30. E. BECAUSE OF THE THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY, THE STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING WILL BE HELD ON WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 15, AT 5:30 P.M. FOLLOWED BY THE JOINT BOARDS MEETING AT 7:30 P.M. AT THIS TIME THERE ARE NO COMMITTEE MEETINGS SCHEDULED FOR DECEMBER. THE JOINT BOARDS WILL MEET ON WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 13TH. MEETING DATE: 10126/96 TEAM 7130 P.M. DISTRICTS: 1.2. 3.S.S.7. 11. 13 8 14 DISTRICT 1 JOINT BOARD6 IMORENOI ........... MC OUIOAN ........ IBOWMANI ........... AGE ............. g` _ (PEMV) ............ FERRYMAN ........ IHA5TIN061........... MOWN ........... (COONTZI ........... MURPHY .......... ISCOTR ............. COLLINB .......... - IPOTTSI ............ SALTAREW ........ IDEBAYI ............. COX ............. IBIENEM ....... STANTON ......... ICO%) ............... DEBAY ......... IBELLI ............... DENES ........... IBAUMI ............. DETTLOFF ......... DISTRICT 2 IPARKM) ............ DUNLAP = (SCOTT) . . ... . COLLINS ......., IDOWNEVI............ EMENRODE ..... (GULUMSONI ..... .... WE. ........... IPERRYI ............. FERRYMAN ...... _ (SELL) . ......... .... GENES ............ IANDERSOM .......... FLORA ......... IPARKERI .......... . DUNLAP........... pt IMARSHALL) .......... GRIFFIN ........... JANDER Y I .......... ECUROMR... ......,. MARDI ............. OULLI%80N ........ J� -_ IDOWNEONI ......... ELORA ODE ........ IWAIIDI ............. NAMMOND ....... IMORENO) ........... MCGUIGAN ...... IMUERI ............. LEIMIG ........... ICOONTZI ........... MURPHY .......... IMINERI ............. LINN . ............ -_ INQRSVI ............ M . ........... IMOREN01 ............ MC OURN ........ IZLAKETI............ MGM ...... ICOONT21 ............ MURMY .......... ISTEINER) ........... STANTON ......... IOUNLAN ............ PARKS........... -_ IDALVI ............. ZEMEL ............ JQL IEPPERSONI........... RICE ............. �L INORBYI ............. SA ... ......... _ DISTRICT 3 IPOTTSI ............. BALTAW........ IDOTSONI ........... SAM ........... y (DOTSONI ............ MNEN ........... IPARI(ERI ........... DUNLAP I.......... 41k RLAKETI............. SINGER ..I........ ISOWMANI .......... AGE ........... STEINER)............. STANTON ......... (HASTINOBI.......... BROWN ........... ISTANTONI ........... STEINS .......... I6COTT .... GROWCOLLINS .......... IMILLERI ............. SWAN............ _ IANDERSONI ......... FLORA ............ IWAHL61AOM1 ........ BVLVIA ........... IMAflSHAIII ......... GRIFFIN ........... IOULLIXSONI .......... WELCH ........... IMUER) ............ LEIPZIO ........... IDALYI .............. 2EMEL ......... (MINER) ............ LINN ............. me (MORENO) ........... MCGUIGAN ...... _ (EMERSO .......... RICE ........,.. STAFF OTHERB NI INORSYI ............ M ............. ANDERSON . SIG WOODRUFF ., RLAKET............ SINGER ....... HASENSTAB � ANDRUS . . .. ISTENERI ........... STANTON .......,, HODGES ... �. DEMN.. . . . . MAHLSTROMI ....... BVLVIA ......,,,.. HOVEY .... . KNOPF . .. . . (DALY) ............. 2EMEL ............ . JONK ..... LEE ........ KYLE ... tL UNDSTROM .. DISTRICTS UNDER .... . NIXON...... (COX) .............. DEBAY............ LUDWIN ... _ MAW...... (STANTON) .......... STEIN DOTS S........... . MCINTYRE.. JL STONE ..... 7 IDEBAYI ............ GOT............. JL OS ...... _ .......... .......... DISTRICTS SMEO . yG ........ IPERRY FERRYMAN......... . WHEATLEY .. . ....... ............ ICO%1 . . ............ DEMY....•....... WILWN ... . . . . .... . (STANTONI .......... STEWS........... WtNNSSOOR�1.F.,/,'[D_ M DISTRICT (WARD ARGI ............ HAMMONO......... (POTT6) ............ SALTAREW ........ 4L UPERR . . ............ DEBAY............ IPEflRYI ............ FERRYMAN......... _ IMORENOI ........... MCGUMAN ........ {� ICOONTZI ........... STERNLY .... NI I6TANTO .......... MURPHY V7`„M_,Lp_O �YAE DISTRICT 11 /�/�/�,4� IBAUERI ............ LFIRIO ........... /YN�-� TI (STEINS .......... STANTOF ......... -_ DISTRIC . . ......... BTANION ....... DISTRICT 13 IWELDHI .. . ... ...... OULLIIEI%SON _ IOAUVI .... ......... MURM ........... (DOONRI .. ......... M AIUMR .......... (DUNLAP) ........... PARKER ........... ,K` (STANTONI .......... STEINS. DISTRICT 14 (POTT$) ............ BALTARELLI ......:: / ' ICOONT21 ........... SALTAR ........ / MARDI ......... HANNON......... ./ (STANTGNI .......... STEINER........... T�(.('(„4 JAWMOMBSWIRER01101-103. IMIWRI ............ SWAN ............ �/ ��!(�� 09127/95 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California P.O.Box 8127 • 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 II DRAFT MINUTES OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Wednesday, September 20, 1995-5:30 P.M. A meeting of the Executive Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, S. 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Wednesday, September 20, 1995, at 5:30 p.m., at the Districts' Administrative offices. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT: Present: Terry Andrus, Counsel Lisa Carlson, Scientist John Cox, Jr., Joint Chair Pat McGuigan, Chair, District 1 and STAFF PRESENT: OMITS Chair John J. Collins, Chair, District 2 and Don McIntyre, General Manager PDC Chair Blake Anderson, Asst. General Manager George Brown, FAHR Chair Judith A. Wilson, Asst. General Manager Sal A. Sapien, Chair, District 3 Gary Hasenstab, Director of Personnel Jan Debay, Chair, District 5 Ed Hodges. Director of Maintenance James Ferryman, Chair, District 6 Steve Hovey, Director of Information Barry Hammond, Chair, District 7 Technology Thomas Saltarelli, Chair, District 14 Bob Ooten, Director of Operations Roger Stanton, County Supervisor Gary Streed, Director of Finance William Steiner, County Supervisor Lauri Bluestein, Laboratory Manager Don R. Griffin, Past Joint Chair Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary Absent: John Gullixson, Chair, District 13 Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. r� i Minutes of the Executive Committee Page 2 of 7 September 20, 1995 (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. (4) APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the July 19, 1995, Executive Committee meeting were approved as drafted. (5) REPORTS OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR, GENERAL MANAGER, AND GENERAL COUNSEL (a) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR There was no report by the Committee Chair. (b) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager asked Judy Wilson, the Chief Administrative Officer, to report on the activities towards consolidation of the Districts. There is a meeting with LAFCO next week; staff is going to propose submitting the required documentation on our own forms and procedures because the LAFCO staff is down to one person. Stall is also working on a new District 14 agreement with IRWD, with the goal of approving that agreement before consolidation. (c) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL There was no report by Counsel. (6), (7), (8) and (14) A motion was made, seconded and passed to approve Items 6, 7, 6 and 14, and to concur in the recommended actions as follows: (6)(a) Consideration of a motion to receive and file draft Minutes of Meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization Study held on July 19, 1995. (6)(b) Consideration of motion to concur in the recommended actions of the Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization Study held on July 19, 1995, as follows: Item 6(b) Authorize Staff to proceed with procurement actions for the modifications to the Administrative Support area. Item 6(c) Authorize staff to design the Information Technology portable office complex in a size large enough to accommodate the Plant Automation Group. (7)(a) Consideration of motion to receive and file Minutes of Meeting of Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization held on July 25, 1995. —'" Minutes of the Executive Committee Page 3 of 7 September 20, 1995 (7)(b) Consideration of motion to concur in the recommended actions of the Ad Hoc Committee Meeting re Space Utilization Study held on July 25, 1995, as follows: Item 6(a): Approving the draft Scope of Work for the Space Utilization Study; authorizing staff to solicit Statements of Qualifications from a minimum of ten firms; and authorizing staff to evaluate the Statements of Qualifications and request proposals from the selected top five firms- (8) Consideration of motion to receive and file Minutes of Meeting of Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization Study held on August 2, 1995. (14) Consideration of motion to receive and file draft Minutes of Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization Study for the meeting held September 7, 1995. (9) and (10) A motion was made, seconded and passed to receive and file revised Minutes of Meetings of Ad Hoc Committee re Landfill Issues held on August 9, 1995 and August 16, 1995. Chair Cox indicated that staff is continuing its due diligence efforts and the Committee will be meeting next month to revisit the issue. Representatives from cities in south Orange County will be asked to attend the meeting so that we may receive any cencems they may have first hand. The General Manager is also continuing discussions with city leaders to advise them of our efforts. Director McGuigan briefed the Committee on the some of the recent actions of the Landfill Commission. (11) A motion was made, seconded and passed to receive and file draft Minutes of Steering Committee meeting held on August 23, 1995. (12) OMTS Committee Chair Pat McGuigan announced that, as a result of Ed Hodges' efforts, the AQMD staff has recommended award to the Districts and their partners$447,000 in AB2677 funds for a compressed natural gas refueling station to be sited on Districts' property. Judy Wilson also thanked the Directors for their city's support for the Districts' proposal. The project will be presented to the Committees next month for approval. One point of interest is that the project should result in revenues to the Districts. (a) A motion was made, seconded and passed to receive and file draft Minutes of Operations, Maintenance, and Technical Services Committee meeting held on September 6, 1995. (b) A motion was made, seconded and passed to concur in the recommended actions of the Operations, Maintenance, and Technical Services Committee held on September 6, 1995, as follows: Minutes of the Executive Committee Page 4 of 7 September 20, 1995 Item 6(a): Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to GTE, in a total amount not to exceed $93,446.81, including sales tax, for the Purchase of Meridian 1 Option 61 Upgrade for PBX at Plant No. 1, and Purchase of Meridian 1 Option 11 E PBX for Plant No. 2 (Specification No. E-258). Item 6(b): Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to GTE for a Telephone Systems Maintenance Agreement for the Districts' existing telephone PBX and related equipment (Specification No. P-163), for a three-year period beginning October 1, 1995 to September 30, 1998, for an amount not to exceed $74,113.80. OMTS95-039: Consideration of Resolution No. 95-_, approving Plans and Specifications for Construction of Improvements to Ocean Outfall Booster Station Control System, Job No. J-31-2. OMTS95-042: Consideration of motion to award a purchase order for Discovery System 616, Millennium 2010 Pentium SS High Pressure Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) system from Waters Corporation (Specification No. E-260), for the total price of$74,210 plus tax and shipping. (13) PDC Chair John Collins advised the Directors that the PDC Committee has decided to take on the review of all change orders, including those for collection system projects in the various Districts. It was felt that this would provide a cohesiveness to the review process. (a) A motion was made, seconded and passed to receive and file draft Minutes of Planning, Design and Construction Committee as revised for the meeting held on September 7, 1995. (b) A motion was made, seconded and passed to concur in the recommended actions of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee held on September 7, 1995, as follows: (These items will be presented to the October Board) PDC95-26: Consideration of the following actions re Purchase of Spark-Ignited Engines for Use in Central Power Generation Systems, Job No. J-19A: (1) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3 to the Plans and Specifications for said Project, authorizing a net deduction of$1,564,750.00 to the contract with Cooper Cameron Corporation, Cooper Energy Services, for one item of additional work and deletion of one portion of work, decreasing the total amount of change orders on this contract to $468,531.82, and increasing the Original Contract Amount of $18,968,113.00 to$19,486,644.82. Minutes of the Executive Committee Page 5 of 7 September 20, 1995 (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 95-—Accepting said contract as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and Approving the Final Closeout Agreement. PDC95-28: Consideration of motion approving actions re Specific Term Employment Agreement with Joseph T. Horvath. OMTS95-039: Consideration of Resolution No. 95-_, approving Plans and Specifications for Construction of Improvements to Ocean Outfall Booster Station Control System, Job No. J-31-2, and recommending that the General Manager be Authorized to establish the date of receipt of bids (Tentative bid date is October 24, 1995). (15) (a) A motion was made, seconded and passed to receive and file draft Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on September 13, 1995. (b) A motion was made, seconded and passed to concur in the recommended actions of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee held on September 13, 1995, as follows: Item 6: Recommend approval of an interest rate for deferred excess capacity charge agreements equal to the rate charged on the date of the agreement on U.S. Treasury Bills or Notes with a term most close to the term of agreement plus 100 basis points. FAHR95-36: Recommend approval of extension of Real Property Lease, Plant No. 1, Lease No. L-009-1, with Lessee, First Bank of California, for a tens of three years at the greater of$60,000 per year or 10% of gross. (16) Discussion of the following information items: (a) Status report on CSD—IRWD Capacity Agreement. Staff has been working with IRWD staff to change the Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Capacity Rights in Treatment, Disposal and Sewer Facilities between County Sanitation District No. 14 and the other County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. The IRWD funds all of the District 14 financial requirements. The original agreement was signed in 1986, and many of the assumptions made at that time have changed dramatically and are no longer valid, resulting in inequities and differences. The time has now come to adjust the agreement based on actual flow. The resulting agreement provides that District 14's annual flow will be calculated by multiplying the actual flow for the four highest months by three to determine a twelve-month flow, beginning with 1995-96; that proceeds from the incremental sale of District 14's share of joint works capital facilities will remain in the District 14 treasury and will be used Minutes of the Executive Committee Page 6 of 7 q September 20, 1995 first to satisfy reserve policy requirements, with any excess used to fund future construction needs; and finally, interest earnings on reserve funds will be allocated to District 14. Staff will continue with their efforts to finalize the agreement, and attempt to verity any other issues that could impact the consolidation effort. Director Saltarelli suggested that the Districts consider buying out IRWD and paying off the bondholders. The issue of a potential conflict of interest by Director Swan was discussed, and it was suggested that this be considered when the Boards act on the agreement. (b) Orange County Bankruptcy Update (1) The Committee recommended receiving and filing the attached Staff Report dated September 25, 1995 on Resolution of Bankruptcy Claims. Blake Anderson presented an update on the bankruptcy as of the meeting this morning with the OCIP. The deal has been struck, but there are several things that still need to be considered, changed, reconciled and finalized. These are contained in the attached presentation package. (2) A motion was made, seconded and passed recommending endorsement of the cooperative agreement in concept, and to wait until the final r"1 agreement and disclosure information has been completed and reviewed by the Boards prior to making a final determination. (17) CLOSED SESSION There was no need for a Closed Session. (18) OTHER BUSINESS Judy Wilson noted that at the last FAHR Committee meeting it was reported that we had received $297 million from out investments that survived the bankruptcy losses and were still owed $400,000 in interest payments from the Pool. On Friday, that money was received by the Districts. Director Sapien asked for the current status of the Techite pipe case. Counsel indicated that the an appeal has been filed by United Technologies Corporation. He will be reporting on this issue in Closed Session next week and will recommend that a cross appeal be filed. Director Sapien asked that he be kept advised on this case. The General Manager again invited the Directors and their families to the Districts' Family Day September 23. This is the first time a Family Day has been held since 1973. We expect about 600, including 125 children. r"� Minutes of the Executive Committee Page 7 of 7 September 20, 1995 (19) MATTERS TO BE REPORTED ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were no matters to be reported on at a subsequent meeting. (20) MATTERS ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT. There were no matters for a future agenda. (21) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next meeting of the Executive Committee is schedule for Wednesday, October 18, 1995 at 5:30 p.m. Chair Cox indicated that because of the many items requiring Committee review and approval, there will be meetings held in November after all. The OMTS Committee will meet on November 1; the PDC Committee on November 2; and the FAHR Committee on November 8. The Executive Committee meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, November 8, 1995, at 7 p.m., following the FAHR Committee. The Joint Board meeting is scheduled for November 15 at 7:30 p.m. (22) ADJOURNMENT The Executive Committee adjourned at approximately 7:10 p.m. Submitted by: n Tappan, Se ary 1 OPGMIIXECLSff9S'IDS%6.MIN A l COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 , 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES JOINT BOARD MEETING OCTOBER 25, 1995 S\oa�\giRICTS 0Fo9q� yQ2 � n0 � G z � � a �olFOl/,y�E ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 ROLL CALL A regular meepno of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7. 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, CalHamia, was held on October 25, 1995, at 7:30 p.m., in the Districts Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocepon the roll was tilled > and the Secretary nmoned a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2,3, S. 6, 7. 11, 13 and 14 as follows: ACTNE ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO. 1: Pat McGuigan, Chair To R. Moreno James M. Ferryman,Chair pro tem AMw Perry Mark A. Murphy Joanne Comm, Themes R.Urinal Jr.Pons Roger Stanton William G.Banner DISTRICT NO.2: g Jam Collins. Chair George Scent x Daniel T.Welch, Chair pro tam John M.Gulli ison Barry Denes Bob Bell 1 Burma Dunlop Glenn Parker a Norman Z.Eckemode Carol Downey James H. Flora Stave Anderson Pat McGuigan Ted R.More. Mark A.Murphy Joanne Coo. Julie Sa Cmis Nancy 1 Sheldon Singer George L.Matter • Roger Stanton William G. Steiner •_ Bob Zonal Tom Daly DISTRICT NO. 3: x Sal A. Sepien, Chan Harry M.Dotson B.me Dunlap, Chain pro lem Glenn Parker • Cecilia Age Welmr Bowman • George Brown Marilyn Bruce Hastings _a_ Jam Colllm George Soon James H.Flora Steve Anderson Don R.Griffin Patsy Marshall Victor Leipaip Ralph Bauer Wally Linn Eva G. Miner Pat McGuigan Ted R. Moreno Margie L.Nice Grace Epperson Julie So Chrrs Noray Sheldon Singer George L.Zlakel 3_ Roger Stanton Wlliam G.Steimr Charles Sylvia Robert Wahlshom Bob Zemel Tom Daly DISTRICT NO. 5: �_ Jan Deny. Clair John C.Cos,Jr. Wiliam G.Steiner, Chair pm tam Roper Stamen g John C. Co.,Jr. Jan Deny DISTRICT NO.6: �� James M.Ferryman.Chair Anhe Perry • Jan Deny.Chair no ter John C.Co.,Jr. 1 Willem G. Shemer Roger Storage DISTRICT 11 7: 1 Barry Hammond, Chair Mike Were 1 Thomas R. Sanrelli,Chair pm tam Jr.Pons 1 Jan Deny John C.cos, Jr. James M.Ferryman Arthur Perry Pal McGuigan Ted R.Moreno Mark A.Murphy Joanne Cogan g Wlliam G.Steiner Roper Stamen DISTRICT NO. 11: Victor Leiosng,Clair Ralph Bauer _v Shirley Dettloff, Chair pro tem Ralph Bauer g Roper Stanton Wiliam G.Steiner DISTRICT NO. 13: Jam M.Gullisson, Chair Daniel T.Welch y Bob Zemel,Chair pro tam Tom Daly y_ Mark A.Murphy _ Joanne Cooma $ Glenn Parker Burnie Dune, y Wiliam G.Steiner Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 14: y Thomas R.Sarstatt"Chair Jun Pons t_ Mark A.Murphy. Cher pro tam Joanne Coantr Barry HammoM Mike Want z William G. Steiner Roger Stange y Peen A. Swan Denryl Miller .2. D 10/25/95 � STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Don McIntyre, General Manager, Blake P. Anderson, Assistant General Manager-Operations, Judith A. Wilson, Assistant General Manager-Administration, Penny Kyle, Board Secretary, Corinne Berenson, Don Crapnell, Mark Esquer, John Finias, Gary Hasenstab, Irwin Haydock, Mike Herrera, Ed Hodges, Patricia Jonk, Terri Josway, Steve Kozak, John Linder, Charles McGee, Gary Streed, Mahin Talebi, Dan Tunnicliff, Paula Zeller OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Terry Andrus, Assistant General Counsel, Chip Clements, Michael Jarman, Jon Schotz, Phil Stone ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Joint Chair The Joint Chair reported that the CASA Fall Technical Meeting is scheduled for November 16th and 17th at the Hyatt Regency in Irvine, and encouraged Directors' attendance. The following tentatively scheduled upcoming meetings were then announced, as follows: Operations, Maintenance, and Technical Services Committee - Wednesday, November 1, at 5:30 p.m. Planning, Design, and Construction Committee- Thursday, November 2, at 5:00 p.m. at Plant No. 2. Finance, Administrative, and Human Resources Committee - Wednesday, November 8, at 5:30 p.m. Executive Committee -Wednesday, November 8, at 7:00 p.m. Steering Committee -Wednesday, November 15, at 5:30 p.m. -3- 10/25195 DISTRICT 1 Aooroval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held September 27, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 Aooroval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held September 27, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 3 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held September 27, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held September 27, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 6 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held September 27, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 7 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held September 27, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. 4- 10/25/95 DISTRICT 11 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held September 27, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 13 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held September 27, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 14 AAporoval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held September 27, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. ALL DISTRICTS Ratification of payment of Joint and Individual District Claims Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That payment of Joint and Individual District claims set forth on exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. -5- 10/25/95 10/04/95 & 09/20/95 10/06/95 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $620,187.44 $798,567.03 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 560,310.76 461,765.16 Joint Working Capital Fund - 115,727.22 135,017.29 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 52,888.38 25,857.34 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 6,317.55 225.00 DISTRICT NO, 2 - 14,322.53 42,506.41 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 234,237.02 81,253.70 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 18,211.07 11,618.76 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 1,232.01 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 7 7,325.96 62,003.57 DISTRICT NO. 11 336,183.65 15,861.88 DISTRICT NO, 13 47.18 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 14 1,952.52 48,450.83 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 121,382.77 4,095.96 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 0.00 2,930.72 DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 0.00 5,643.39 $2,090,326.06 $1.695.797.04 ALL DISTRICTS Actions re Purchase of Three Cab and Chassis with Crane Mounted Service Body. Soecification No. V-008 Receive and file letter from Maurice J. Soop Truck Center Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the letter dated September 28, 1995, from Maurice J. Sopp Truck Center, apparent low bidder, requesting that they be allowed to withdraw their bid for Purchase of Three Cab and Chassis with Crane Mounted Service Body, Specification No. V-008, due to a mathematical error, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed, and approved. -6- 10/25/95 Awarding Purchase of Specification No. V-008. to Mike McCarthy Buick & GMC Truck Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the bid tabulation and recommendation for award of Purchase of Three Cab and Chassis with Crane Mounted Service Body, Specification No. V-008, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase order be, and is hereby, awarded to Mike McCarthy Buick& GMC Truck, for a total amount not to exceed $124,346.37, plus sales tax. ALL DISTRICTS Approving Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement with Falcon Disposal Services, Inc. Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement with Falcon Disposal Services, Inc., for transportation of residual solids for disposal within a 40-mile radius, extending the agreement for a six-month period beginning October 30, 1995, at the existing contract unit price of$260.00 per load for grit and screening, and $12.08 per ton for sludge, be, and is hereby, approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to execute said Amendment in form approved by General Counsel. ALL DISTRICTS Approving Amendment No. 4 to the Agreement with BKK Corporation Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Amendment No. 4 to the Agreement with BKK Corporation for interim residual solids disposal, extending the agreement for a six-month period beginning October 30, 1995, at the existing contract unit price of$31.38 per ton for grit, screenings, and sludge, be, and is hereby, approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to execute said Amendment in form approved by General Counsel. -7- 10/25/95 ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file draft minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization Study Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the draft minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization Study meetings held on July 14, 1995, and September 13, 1995, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file draft minutes of the Steering Committee Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the draft minutes of the Steering Committee meeting held on September 27, 1995, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file draft minutes of the Operations. Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the draft minutes of the Operations, Maintenance, and Technical Services Committee meeting held on October 4, 1995, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file draft minutes of the Plannino. Design, and Construction Committee Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the draft minutes of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee meeting held on October 5, 1995, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. -8- 10/25/95 ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file draft minutes of the Finance. Administration. and Human Resources Committee Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the draft minutes of the Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee meeting held on October 11, 1995, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file draft minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re Landfill Acquisition Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the draft minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re Landfill Acquisition meeting held on October 18, 1995, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file draft minutes of the Executive Committee Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the draft minutes of the Executive Committee meeting held on October 18, 1995, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS (OMTS95-043) Approving Professional Services Agreement with Communications Performance Group. Inc. for design of an Integrated Emergency Response Plan (Specification No. P-166) Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Operations, Maintenance, and Technical Services Committee certification of the final negotiated fee relative to the Professional Services Agreement with Communications Performance Group, Inc. for design of an Integrated Emergency Response Plan (Specification No. P-166), be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed, and approved; and, -9- 10/25/95 FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 95-104, approving said agreement with Communications Performance Group, Inc. for said services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor, including overhead, plus fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $125,000.00 for the 1995-96 fiscal year, and a total cost not to exceed $312,232.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS (OMTS95-045) Authorizing an increase in Districts' expenditure for in-house laboratory analyses supporting the Joint Ultraviolet Pilot Proiect with Orange County Water Districts Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to increase Districts' expenditures for in-house laboratory analyses supporting the Joint Ultraviolet Pilot Project with Orange County Water District, increasing the Districts' cost for direct labor and material for an additional amount of$17,000.00, increasing the total authorized amount from $40,000.00 to an amount not to exceed $57,000.00. ALL DISTRICTS (PDC95-,311 Aoorovino. in concept. the Partnerino Charter and the Value Engineering Clause to the contract with Margate Construction. Inc.. for Job No. P1-36-2 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Partnering Charter and the Value Engineering Clause to the contract with Margate Construction, Inc. for Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36-2, be, and is hereby, approved in concept. ALL DISTRICTS (OMTS95-041) Approve. in concept construction of Compressed Natural Gas Refueling Station. Job No. P1-51 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the construction of a Compressed Natural Gas Refueling Station, Job No. P1-51, be, and is hereby, approved in concept: and, -10- 10/25/95 FURTHER MOVED: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to loan reserve funds in the 1995-96 budget to build the station; and, FURTHER MOVED: That staff be, and is hereby, directed to establish an enterprise report for future review. ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR95-25) Adopting Resolution No. 95-105, Repealing Resolution No. 95-54, Pertaining to Classification. Compensation and Other Terms Conditions. Rules. and Regulations of Employment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 95-105, repealing Resolution No. 95-54 Pertaining to Classification, Compensation, and Other Terms, Conditions, Rules and Regulations of Employment, reflecting changes occurring in legislation and labor law, and required insurance coverages. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR95-38) Authorizing staff to solicit bids for a Professional Services Agreement re Financial Information System Proiecl (Specification No P-167) Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to solicit bids for a Professional Services Agreement for the Financial Information System Project, for completion of Phase lll, Selection Process for Hardware and Software; and, Phase IV, Implementation and Acceptance of the Selected Hardware and Software Solutions (Specification No. P-167). -11- 10/25/95 ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR9540) Authorizina staff to negotiate Amendment No. 2 to the Aareement between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1.2.3.5,6.7.11 & 13 and County Sanitation District No. 14 re Purchase and Sale of Capacity Rights in Treatment. Disoosal. and Sewer Facilities Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to negotiate Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 & 13 and County Sanitation District No. 14 for Purchase and Sale of Capacity Rights in Treatment, Disposal and Sewer Facilities, providing for District No. 14's annual flow to be based upon actual average flow per day for the four highest months, and providing capacity for higher winter month flows. ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR9541) Receive and file monthly reports of Pacific Investment Management Company Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the monthly investment report and staff report regarding performance monitoring of Pacific Investment Management Company be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR9542) Actions re Establishing Policy for Microcomputer Acquisitions Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the policy that all PC technology purchases be limited to the most recent list of Tier 1 and Tier 2 vendors as defined by The Gartner Group, for both desktop computers and mobile computers, be, and is hereby, declared; and, FURTHER MOVED: That a policy that all purchasing actions relating to the purchase of PC technology utilize the California Multiple Award Schedule (CMAS) contracts for the purchase of PC technology from among the Tier 1 and Tier 2 vendors as defined by Gartner Group; and authorizing staff to compare CMAS pricing to choose the lowest priced Tier 1 and Tier 2 vendor's configuration applicable to the Districts' needs, be, and is hereby, declared. -12- 10/25/95 Authorizino staff to issue a purchase order to Dell Computer (Specification No. E-2611 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue a purchase order to Dell Computer for the Purchase of 60 Personal Computers and Monitors and Other Associated Components (Specification No. E-261) for a total amount not to exceed $208,900.00, plus sales tax. Director Mark A. Murphy requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR95-43) Establishing a Relief Operator bonus Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 95-106, authorizing the establishment of a Relief Operator bonus of$0.60 per hour for employees covered by the Operations and Maintenance Memorandum of Understanding. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Request for review and recommendations regarding implementation of time clocks for Districts' staff Director Gullixson expressed concern regarding time management of Districts' staff and the possibility of implementing time clocks. It was then moved that a study be completed by the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee on the issue of time clock implementation. The motion failed to pass. ALL DISTRICTS Status of the Strategic Plan The Assistant General Manager of Operations gave a brief report and, using slides, illustrated the timeline for the strategic plan. -13- 10/25f9e ALL DISTRICTS Actions relative to the proposed acquisition of County of Orange Integrated Waste Management System Verbal Report by Assistant General Manager of Operations The Assistant General Manager of Operations gave a brief report and update on the feasibility of acquiring the County of Orange Integrated Waste Management System. Authorizing staff and consultants to conduct expanded Phase 1 Assessment Studies Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to conduct expanded Phase Assessment Studies on moderate and high exposure landfill sites, to be done within the previously authorized amount of$100,000.00. Authorizing consulting services for Phase II Assessment Study Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That consulting services for Phase II Assessment Study to determine landfill assets and liabilities for an amount not to exceed $100,000.00, be, and are hereby, authorized. Authorizing staff to issue letter of interest to enter into negotiations for purchase of the County of Orange Integrated Waste Management System Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue a letter of interest to enter into negotiations to develop an agreement between the County of Orange and the Districts for the purchase and sale of the County of Orange Integrated Waste Management System; and, -14- 10/25/95 That an amount not to exceed $100,000.00 in nonrefundable payments, be, and is hereby, authorized to be applied toward the purchase price; that said contract provide that the County will enter into negotiations with the County Sanitation Districts and will not enter into contract negotiations with any other entity, either public or private, for a period of nine (9) months. The County shall also provide to the Sanitation Districts any and all unsolicited offers, proposals, or solicitations of offers made to the County. Said contract to further provide that the $100,000.00 shall be refunded to the extent of 50% provided a final agreement for the purchase and sale of the facilities is made and entered into between the parties. Director Victor Leipzig requested that his opposition to this item be made a matter of record. Director Pat McGuigan requested that her abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. ALL DISTRICTS Status report re County's Commingled Investment Pool Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager of Operations, and Tom Woodruff, General Counsel, gave a brief report on the status of the Orange County Commingled Investment Pool and the County of Orange bankruptcy. ALL DISTRICTS General Counsel's comments Prior to Closed Session General Counsel reported to the Directors the need for a closed session as authorized by Government Code Section 54956.9 to discuss and consider the item specified as Item 16(b)(4) on the published Agenda. General Counsel also indicated a need to add one item needing immediate action that arose subsequent to the publication of the agenda. He reported that additional items could be added pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2(b) upon a two- thirds vote of the Directors. No other items would be discussed or acted upon. ALL DISTRICTS Add Item to the Closed Session Agenda Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Item 16(b)(5) to confer with General Counsel re County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California, vs. E. L. Yeager Construction Company, at al, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 732578, be added to the Agenda. -15- 10/25/95 ALL DISTRICTS Convene in Closed Session Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 The Boards convened in closed session at 9:02 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Boards of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. No action was taken re Agenda Item Nos. 16(b)(1), (2), and (3). ALL DISTRICTS Reconvene in regular session At 9:14 p.m., the Boards reconvened in regular session. ALL DISTRICTS County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California. vs. E. L. Yeager Construction Company, at al.. Orange County Suoerior Court Case No. 732578 General Counsel reported that during closed session, the Boards Directors acted to authorize General Counsel to accept a settlement proposal of Defendant E. L. Yeager Construction Company prior to or at time of trial, if in accordance with the terms and conditions established by the Boards. ALL DISTRICTS Actions re Supplemental Agenda Item relative to Summons and Complaint for Inverse Condemnation, Edward T. Reid vs. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 752065 Authorizing consideration of Supplemental Agenda Item relative to Summons and Complaint for Inverse Condemnation, Edward T. Reid vs. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. Orange County Superior Court Case No. 752065 -16- 10/25/95 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby authorize consideration of a supplemental agenda item relative to Summons and Complaint for Inverse Condemnation, Edward T. Reid vs. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 752065, which was not posted 72 hours prior to the Board meeting date because the request to take said action arose subsequent to the agenda being posted. Receive and file Summons and Complaint for Inverse Condemnation. Edward T. Reid vs. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. Orange County Superior Court Case No. 752065 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Summons and Complaint for Inverse Condemnation, Edward T. Reid vs. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 752065, in connection with the Santa Ana River widening project with the County of Orange, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Districts' General Counsel be, and is hereby, authorized to appear and defend the interests of the Districts. DISTRICT 1 Approving Settlement Agreement with Alphanetics. Inc. and Francisco Lopez Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Settlement Agreement with Alphanetics, Inc. and Francisco Lopez, for administrative penalties in the amount of$42,000.00 for wastewater discharge violations, be, and is hereby, approved, in a form approved by General Counsel. -17- 10/25/95 DISTRICT 1 Journment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:14 p.m. DISTRICT 2 Actions re Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Trunk Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-R1 Approvino Change Order No. 3 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing an addition of $7,398.80 to the contract with Colich Bros., Inc. dba Colich & Sons, for one item of additional work, and granting a time extension of 30 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. AApprovina Chance Order No. 4 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Change Order No. 4 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a net deduction of $109,637.60 from the contract with Colich Bros., Inc. dba Colich & Sons, be, and is hereby, approved. Acceptinc Contract No. 2-9-R1 as complete Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 95-107-2, accepting Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Trunk Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-R1, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion, and approving Final Closeout Agreement for a final total contract amount of$2,657,809.81. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -18- 10/25/95 DISTRICT 2 Adiournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:14 p.m. DISTRICT 3 Adioumment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:14 p.m. DISTRICT 5 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:14 p.m. DISTRICTS 6. 7 & 14 Actions re Baker-Gisler Interceptor. from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1. Contract No. 14-1-1A Approving Change Order No. 3 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing an addition of$39,734.90 to the contract with Mladen Buntich Construction Co., Inc., for five items of additional work, and granting a time extension of 33 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. -19- 10/25/95 Approving Chance Order No. 4 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Change Order No. 4 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing an addition of$209,090.78 to the contract with Mladen Buntich Construction Co., Inc., for nine items of additional work, and granting a time extension of 39 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. Approvinc Chance Order No. 5 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Change Order No. 5 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a net addition of$36,059.00 to the contract with Mladen Buntich Construction Co., Inc., be, and is hereby, approved. Accepting Contract No. 14-1-1A as complete Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 95-108, accepting Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-1A, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion, and approving Final Closeout Agreement for a final total contract amount of$8,810,715.81. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 6 Journment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:14 p.m. -20- 10/25/95 DISTRICT 7 Loyd Nitzen v. County Sanitation Districts, OCSC Case No. 712847 Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That Special Legal Counsel be, and is hereby, authorized to accept Plaintiffs settlement proposal. DISTRICT 7 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:14 p.m. DISTRICT 11 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:14 p.m. DISTRICT 13 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:14 p.m. -21- 10/25/95 DISTRICT 14 Adjournment Moved, seconded, and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:14 p.m. 4aw3rlee -- Secretary of B s of Directors of County Sa ' a o Districts Nos, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, , 11, 13 and 14 _22_ FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9114/95 PAGE 1 ' REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0920195 POSTING DATE 0920/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 147022 ACGIH,INC. $312.14 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 147023 AGTECHCOMPANY $55.729.65 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91 147024 ATM AA,INC. 54.485.00 LAB SERVICES 147025 AT&T-BUSINESS LONG DISTANCE SERVICE $5.00 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 147025 A-Z LOGIC SYSTEMS $233.64 MACHINE REPAIRS 147027 ACCOUNTANTS OVERLOAD $220.50 TEMPORARY PERSONNEL SERVICES 147028 ACTION DOOR REPAIR CORP. $340.76 DOOR REPAIRS 147029 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS,INC. &445,687.81 CONSTRUCTION PI-384 147030 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS,INC. $4.800.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 147031 AIR COLD SUPPLY,INC. $164.74 AIR CONDITIONER REPAIRS 147032 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $18.037.20 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.0.6.9A9 147033 ALLIED ELECTRONICS S7D6.54 INSTRUMENT PARTS 147034 AMERICAN PROTECTIVE SER.,INC. $1.252.34 CONTRACT SECURITY SERVICES 147035 AMERICAN SIGMA $1,119.52 LAB SUPPLIES 147036 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION $12.461.82 SEWER REPAIRS 147037 ANALYSTS,INC. $1,657.49 MECHANICAL PARTS 147038 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL E330.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 147039 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $2,626A2 NOTICES&ADS m 147040 APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS,INC. $1,376.35 LAB SUPPLIES X 147041 ABC LABORATORIES $3,830.00 LAB SERVICES i=. 147D42 AQUATIC BIOSYSTEMS,INC. $235.00 LAB SERVICES t7J 147043 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT $1.268.50 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES --4 147044 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. $60.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL D 147045 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $3.924.60 PAYROLL SERVICES 1 147D46 AWARDS&TROPHIES $162.79 PLAQUES 147047 BKK LANDFILL $2.509.03 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10.9.91 147048 BANANA BLUEPRINT $4.223.40 PRINTING M.0.11.07-94 147049 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $1,929.29 BATTERIES 147050 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $4,27&31 LAB SUPPLIES 147051 BENZ ENGINEERING,INC. $270.95 COMPRESSOR PARTS 7470S2 WT BILLARD,INC. $249.60 BUILDING REPAIRS 147053 810-GRO DIVISION $45,595.77 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.4-2695 147054 BOOT BARN $113.03 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 147055 THE BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFFAIRS $1.411.53 HUMAN RESOURCES PUBLICATION 147056 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. $289.21 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 147057 C.L.TECHNOLOGY 6720.00 GAS ANALYSIS SERVICES 147058 CS COMPANY $2.455.08 HARDWAREIPLUMBING SUPPLIES 147059 CALTEX PLASTICS,INC- $1.071.00 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 147060 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $1,755.86 OFFICE FURNITURE 147061 CENTURY SAFETY INST.&SUPPLY $8,186.93 SAFETY SUPPLIES 147DS2 CHEMICAL ENGINEERING $50.00 SUBSCRIPTION 147DS3 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $87.28 SERVICE AGREEMENT 147DS4 COLE-PALMER INSTRUMENT CO. &B21.87 LABSUPPUES 147065 COUCH&SONS $323.189.50 CONSTRUCTION 11-17-1 147066 COMPUSERVE $246.28 COMPUTER SERVICES 147067 CONSOU13ATED ELECTRICAL DIST $939.04 ELECTRIC PARTS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9114195 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 09/20/95 POSTING DATE 0920195 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 147068 CONSUMER PIPE $918.59 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 147069 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC. $338.76 TOOLS 147070 COOPER CAMERON CORP. _ $1,249.28 ENGINE PARTS 147071 COUNTY CLERK $342.00 CEQA FEES 147072 COUNTY CLERK $38.00 CEQA FEES 147073 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 42,510.12 ELECTRIC PARTS 147074 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $4,064.00 STATE UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 147075 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $200.00 ANNEXATION FEE 147076 DAILY PILOT $144.00 NOTICES&ADS 147077 HSK/DECKER $404.91 INSTRUMENT PARTS 147078 DE GUELLE&SONS GLASS CO. $462.01 GLASS 147079 DELL COMPUTER CORP. $10.556.06 COMPUTER HARDWARE 147080 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIF. $47,435.78 DENTAL INSURANCE PLAN M.O.1-12-94 147081 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $2,050.00 COMPUTER TRAINING 147082 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $940.00 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 147083 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $1.781.00 PAINT SUPPLIES 147084 DYCAM,INC. $1,505.40 COMPUTER PARTS 147085 ESP NORTH $2,070.52 SECURITY SUPPLIES m 1470BS EASTMAN,INC. $991,63 OFFICE SUPPLIES x 1470B7 EMPIRE SCALES CO. $32.65 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 147066 ENCHANTER,INC. $3,500.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5-24-95 147089 ENVIROGEN,INC. $5.029.00 BIOTRICKLING FILTER PROJECT 147090 FMC CORPORATION $102,204.91 HYDROGEN PEROXIDE M.O.9-14-94 147091 PST SAND AND GRAVEL,INC. $532.49 ROAD BASE MATERIALS n 147092 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $6,322.50 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O. 10-9-91 N 147093 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $501.00 AIR FREIGHT 147094 FISCHER&PORTER CO. $1,751.27 STRIP CHART PAPER 147095 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $2,317.40 LAB SUPPLIES 147096 FISIONS INSTRUMENTS $879.44 LAB SUPPLIES 147097 FLICKINGER CO. $1,637.96 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 147098 FLOSYSTEMS.INC. $8.964.88 PUMP PARTS 147D99 FOSS MARITIME CO. $88.20 FREIGHT CHARGES 147100 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $154.87 PHOTO SUPPLIES 147101 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $321.23 PAINT SUPPLIES 147102 FOUR WHEEL PARTS WHOLESALER $339.73 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 147103 THE FOXBORO CO. $1,737.03 INSTRUMENT PARTS 147104 FRANCE COMPRESSOR PRODUCT $727.87 COMPRESSOR PARTS 147105 FRAZEE PAINT&WALCOVERING $189AO PAINT SUPPLIES 14T706 FRY'S ELECTRONICS $95.81 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 147107 CST,INC. $2.078.72 OFFICE SUPPLIES 147108 GTE TELEPHONE OPERATIONS $12.053.00 RELOCATE TELEPHONE SYSTEM AT PLANT 1471D9 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $116.37 CHEMICALS 147110 GENERAL ALUMINUM FORGINGS $117.39 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 147111 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $3,898.80 ELECTRIC PARTS 147112 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $248.45 TELEPHONE SERVICES 147113 GENICOM CORPORATION $839.00 PRINTING SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/14195 PAGE 3 ' REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 09I20/95 POSTING DATE 09/20/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 147114 GIERLICH-MITCHELL,INC. $1.053.79 PUMP PARTS 147115 N.GLANTZ 8 SON,INC. $570.07 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 147116 GOLDEN BELL PRODUCTS $301.70 CLEANER 147117 GRAPHIC CONTROLS $235.46 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 147118 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $229.38 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 147119 GRASSY S.T.I. $2,497.85 ENGINE PARTS 147120 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $1.678.99 PRINTING 147121 DGA CONSULTANTS 611,343A9 ENGINEERING SERVICES 3.35R 147122 DAVID R.GRIFFIN $176,033.02 LEGAL SERVICES-TECHNE PIPE M.O.9-14-94 147123 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $1,037.64 TRUCK PARTS 147124 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $487.74 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 147125 PL HAWN CO,INC. $6.403.58 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 147126 HELPMATES PERSONNEL SERVICES $1.151.20 TEMPORARY PERSONNEL SERVICES 147127 HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT $2.083.33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN. 147128 HEWLETT PACKARD CO. $3,496.50 SERVICE AGREEMENT 147129 HILTI,INC. $639.05 FITTINGS 147130 RC HOFFMAN AND/OR ISCO $100.17 MACHINE REPAIRS 147131 HOME DEPOT $233.85 HARDWARE TT1 147132 IRS HUGHES CO,INC. $790.70 SIGNS X 147133 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $1,178.25 WATER USE 147134 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $22,036.13 PERMIT FEES 147135 HYCLONE LABORATORIES $733.63 LAB SUPPLIES y 147136 IPCO SAFETY $6,200.98 SAFETY SUPPLIES n 147137 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $98,610.35 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11-18-92 I 147138 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $807.90 CONNECTORS W 147139 INTUITIVE TECHNOLOGY $16,195.00 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 147140 J2 PRINTING SERVICES $604.48 PRINTING 147141 JIT COMPUTER SOURCE,INC. $3,025.62 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 147142 JAMISON ENGINEERING,INC. $1,362.34 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 147143 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY. $357.06 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 147144 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO. $1,001.20 GAUGE 147145 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $154.18 ELECTRIC PARTS 147146 JONES CHEMICALS,INC. $16.261.35 CHEMICALS 147147 KALLEEN'S COMPUTER PRODUCTS $175.01 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 147148 KING BEARING,INC. $304.88 MACHINE SUPPLIES 147149 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $161.48 HARDWARE 147150 L A CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $383.27 SERVICE AGREEMENTS 147151 LAW/CRANDAL.INC. 51,675.00 SOIL TESTING 7-13-94 147152 LIMITORQUE CORP. $819.66 ELECTRIC REPAIRS 147153 THE LITIGATION GROUP $6,609.56 POST-TRIAL INTERVIEW•TECHI'TE PIPE 147154 LOCALAGENCY E5D0.00 ANNEXATION FEES 147155 MPS $26.83 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 147158 MACOMCO $464.10 SERVICE AGREEMENT 147157 MANDtC MOTORS $149.00 TOWING SERVICES 147158 MANHOLE ADJUSTING $7.900.00 MANHOLE ADJUSTING SERVICES 147159 MANLEY'S BOILER REPAIR CO,INC. $978.75 BOILER REPAIRS FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 9114195 PAGE4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 09/20/95 POSTING DATE 09/20/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 147160 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $0.23 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 147161 MASONEILAN N.AMER,OPERATIONS $3.553.60 INSTRUMENT PARTS 147162 MCMAHAN DESK,INC. $1,139.46 OFFICE FURNITURE 147163 MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. $1,407.44 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 147164 MICRO MOTION E5,188.36 INSTRUMENT PARTS 147165 MICROBIAL INSIGHTS,INC. E150.00 CONSULTING SERVICES M.O.11.18-92 147168 MICROBICS CORPORATION $856.08 OCEAN MONITORING 147167 MIDWAY MFG.B MACHINING $7,370.97 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 147160 MINNESOTA WESTERN VISUAL PRES. $557.69 LAB SUPPLIES 147169 MISSION ABRASIVE SUPPLIES $553.20 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 147170 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3,840.97 UNIFORM RENTALS 147171 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO. $861.00 ELECTRIC PARTS 147172 MONITOR LABS $931.32 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 147173 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL E380.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES 147174 NEALSUPPLYCO. $674.80 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 147175 NEUTRON $7,014.50 ANIONIC POLYMER M.O.8-10.94 147176 NEW HORIZONS COMPUTER CENTER $4.800.00 COMPUTER TRAINING CLASSES 147177 NICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY $308.71 INDUSTRIAL GREASE m 147178 OFFICE PAVILIONS6NTERIOR RESOURCES $599.09 OFFICE FURNITURE REPAIRS X 147179 OLE LEE,INC. $69.27 TRUCK PARTS 147180 OMEGA CORP. $375.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT DC 147181 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE E7,400.44 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 147182 ORANGE VALVE 8 FITTING CO. $472.30 LAB SUPPLIES 147183 OXYGEN SERVICE $2,737.21 SPECIALTY GASES n 147184 COUNTY OF ORANGE $401.50 PERMIT FEES r 147185 PSI $117.06 HARDWARE 147188 PS51 E3,280.95 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION 147187 PACIFIC CLIPPINGS $126.70 NEWSPAPER CLIPPING SERVICES 147180 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $5.925.79 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 147189 PACIFIC PARTS $5.677.09 INSTRUMENT PARTS 147190 PACIFIC BELL $43.18 TELEPHONE SERVICES 147191 PAGENET $991.21 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 147192 PAINE WEBBER $42.020.63 COP REMARKETING FEES 147193 PAK WEST $1,376.18 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 147194 PARTS UNLIMITED $609.12 TRUCK PARTS 147195 PENINSULA PUMP CORP. $4,978.05 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 147196 PERMA SEAL $182.69 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 147197 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $5.484.84 REIMB.PETTY CASH,TRAINING 8 TRAVEL 147198 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $120,395.70 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3-29-95 147199 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS E315.72 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 147200 POLYPURE,INC. $22,416.41 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92 147201 POTTORFF COMPANY $64.53 ELECTRIC PARTS 147202 POWER SYSTEMS TESTING CO. $1,249.99 ELECTRICAL TESTING 147203 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $160.00 ICE 1472D4 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE IND. $2.280.00 SOIL TESTING 147205 PUBLIC SECTOR EXCELLENCE $5.000.00 TRAINING CATALOG DEVELOPMENT a PRODUCTION FUND NO BIBS - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9114195 PAGE 5 ' REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 092MS POSTING DATE 0920/95 , WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 147205 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $410.69 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS 147207 R&R INSTRUMENTS $2,498.38 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 147200 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $2,062.75 TRASH REMOVAL 1472D9 RED WING SHOES $205.88 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 147210 REMEDYTEMP $2,490.84 TEMPORARY PERSONNEL SERVICES 147211 RM MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL $236.43 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 147212 ST ANDREWS MACHINE CO. $88.20 MACHINE REPAIRS 147213 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS $975.50 ELECTRIC PARTS 147214 SANTA ANA PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL $2,221.43 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 147215 SANTA FE BAG CO. $297.65 OPERATING SUPPLIES 147210 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $551.69 SPECIALTY GASES 147217 SEA COAST DESIGNS $3.012.23 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 147218 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $1,833.58 HARDWARE 147219 SHURELUCK SALES $66.85 HARDWARE 147220 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO. $132.37 LAB SUPPLIES 147221 SKILL PATH,INC. $356.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING REGISTRATION 147222 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $250.12 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 147223 M.LEE SMITH PUBLISHERS&ASSOC, $387.00 CA SAFETY&HEALTH MONITOR SUBSCRIPTION In m 147224 SNAP-ON/SUN CORP. $1,521.37 INSTRUMENT 2 147225 SO COAST AIR QUALITY $150.00 PERMIT FEES 147220 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY $1,315.60 PERMIT FEES .. 147227 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. $10,553.02 POWER 147228 SO.CAL GAS.CO. $2.783.07 NATURAL GAS y 147229 SO.CALIF.WATER CO. $64.65 WATER USE 147230 SOUTH SHORE $3.083.33 WINDOW WASHING SERVICES 147231 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER $2,929.34 DRINKING WATERICOOLER RENTALS 147232 WESTALLOY,INC. $463.97 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 147233 SPECIALIZED PRODUCTS CO. $1.090.91 TOOLS 147234 SPECTRON&ASSOCIATES $308.25 LAB SUPPLIES 147235 STERLINGART $90.96 OFFICE SUPPLIES 147236 SUPELCO,INC. 6168.65 LAB SUPPLIES 147237 SUPERB ONE-HOUR PHOTO $11.31 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 147M SUPER CHEM CORP. $400.82 CHEMICALS 147239 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $680.12 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 147240 TEKMAR COMPANY $700.86 LAB SUPPLIES 147241 TELA-TRAIN,INC. $195.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING REGISTRATION 147242 TELE-CELL,INC. $1,628.25 TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT 147243 THOMAS BROS MAPS 84,0D0.D0 PRINTING 147244 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 5497.15 MECHANICAL PARTS 147245 TONER SYSTEM INTERNATIONAL $1,400.21 PRINTING SUPPLIES 147245 TONYS LOCK&SAFE SERVICE $82.55 LOCKS&KEYS 147247 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE,INC. $644.35 SAFETY SUPPLIES 147248 TREBOR ELECTRONICS $682.68 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 147249 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $216.84 TRUCK PARTS 147250 TRUESDAIL LABS $5.587.00 LIB SERVICES 147251 JG TUCKERS SON,INC. $28.32 INSTRUMENT PARTS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9114195 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 09/20/95 POSTING DATE 0912WS WARRANT NO. VENDOR 147252 20TH CENTURY INSURANCE CO. $3,369.27 LIABILITY CLAIM 147253 U.S.AUTO GLASS CENTERS $70.31 TRUCK PARTS 147254 US RENTALS $135.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 147255 UNISOURCEWOR BUTLER PAPER $336.40 OFFICE SUPPLIES 147256 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $500.42 PARCEL SERVICES 147257 VWR SCIENTIFIC $627.03 LAB SUPPLIES 147258 VALLEY CRIES SUPPLY CO. $3,314.87 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 147259 VARIABLE SPEED DRIVES $1,495.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS 147260 VARIAN ASSOCIATES,INC. $685.08 LAB SUPPLIES 147281 WEFTEC V5 $605.00 BIOSOUDS RECYCLING CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 147262 WACKENHUT CORP. $1,038.75 SECURITY SERVICES 147263 WAL-CON CONSTRUCTION CO. $121,326.87 CONSTRUCTION 5.373 147254 WARRINGTON $115.00 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS 147265 WATERS CORPORATION $8,489.48 LAB SUPPLIES 147266 WAXIE $1.067.85 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 147267 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $11,260.15 CAUSTIC SODA&HYPOCHLORIDE M.O.8-12-92&4.13-94 147208 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $988.65 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 147269 XEROX CORP. $1,074.09 COPIER LEASES f1l 147270 YELLOW SPRINGS INSTRUMENT CO. $54.74 INSTRUMENT PARTS X 147271 JOHNSON YOKOGAWA CORP. $2,373.69 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 2 to TOTAL CLAIMS PAID W20M $2,090,328.06 n m FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/14195 PAGE 7 ' REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 09120MS POSTING DATE 09/20I85 WARRANT NO. VENDOR SUMMARY AMOUNT 01 CONSTR FUND $6,317.55 02 OPER FUND 33.50 02 CONSTR FUND 14,289.03 03 OPER FUND 37,355.15 03 CAP FAC FUND 182.849.43 03 CONSTR FUND 14,032.44 05 OPER FUND 16,024.16 05 CAP PAC FUND 14.41 05 CONSTR FUND 2,172.60 06 CONSTR FUND 1.232.01 07 0PER FUND 4,620.15 07 CAP FAC FUND 579.72 07 CONSTR FUND 2,128.09 011 OPER FUND 10,575.78 m 011 CAP FAC FUND 324,080.56 X 011 CONSTR FUND 1.525.31 .�. 013 CONSTR FUND 47.18 w 014 CAP FAC FUND 1,675.00 014 CONSTR FUND 277.52 0586 CAP FAC FUND 121.382.77 ]? JT OPER FUND 620.187.44 V DORF 560,310.76 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND 52.888.38 .IT DIST WORKING CAPITAL 115,727.22 2,090,328.06 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 09/28/95 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID IOM/95 POSTING DATE ID104/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 147292 A-1 FENCE CO INC. $630.00 GATE REPAIR 147293 ACWAISALARY SURVEY $120.00 SALARY&BENEFITS SURVEY 147294 AGTECHCOMPANY $56,609.93 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91 147295 ASL CONSULTING ENGINEERS $1,807.50 ATWOOD SUBTRUNK PLAN PREPARATION 147296 ATM AA,INC. $150.00 LAB SERVICES 147297 AT&T-CELLULAR CR&R $1.87 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 147298 ACADEMIC PRESS $356.05 PUBLICATIONS 147299 ACCUSLUDGE $400.99 LAB SUPPLIES 147300 ADVANCED COOLING TECHNOLOGY $24341 ELECTRIC PARTS 147301 AIR LIOUIDE AMERICA CORP. $2,245.00 SPECIALTY GASSES 147302 ALHAMBRA FOUNDRY CO LTD $3,769.10 MANHOLE FRAMES&COVERS 147303 ASCE CONTINUING EDUCATION $402.50 SAFETY VIDEO PROGRAM 147304 AMERIDATA $851.23 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 147305, AMERICAN METAL BEARING CO $1,038.75 BEARINGS 147306 AMERICAN PROTECTIVE SERVICE,INC. $326.40 SECURITY SERVICE 147307 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION $5,229.25 SEWER REPAIRS 147308 BLAKE P ANDERSON $171.86 CELLULAR PHONE REIMBURSEMENT 147309 ANIXTER-DISTRIBUTION $1,298.02 COMPUTER SUPPLIES M 147310 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $1,702.88 NOTICES&ADS Z 147311 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $952.45 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 147312 ABC LABORATORIES $1.395.00 LAB SERVICES 147313 ARMOR-VAC $1.680.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 147314 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE,INC. $6.208.00 TOXIC WASTE REMOVAL 147315 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. $60.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL i 147316 ASSOCIATED CONCRETE PRODUCTS $174.55 BUILDING MATERIALS 147317 ATKINIJONES COMPUTER SERVICE $321.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT 147318 AWARDS&TROPHIES $14.09 PLAQUES 147319 BFI MEDICAL WASTE SYSTEMS $4.00 WASTE DISPOSAL 147320 BANCROFT-WHITNEY CO.. $139.00 PUBLICATION 147321 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $120.25 BATTERIES 147322 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $3.317.73 LAB SUPPLIES 147323 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $431.30 TRUCK WASH TICKETS 147324 BIO-GRO DIVISION $52,443.84 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M04-26-95 147325 BLAIR-MARTIN CO,INC. $513.13 VALVE MANIFOLDS 147326 BOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE $468.70 TRUCK REPAIRS 147327 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $17,035.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-18 147328 BUDGET JANITORIAL $3.330.00 JANITORIAL SERVICES M01-12-94 147329 BURKE ENGINEERING CO, $52.14 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 147330 BUSH&ASSOCIATES,INC. $15.332.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6-8-94 147331 CALFON CONSTRUCTION $28,839.67 CONSTRUCTION 7.22&7-24 147332 CALTROL,INC. $1.985.20 HARDWARE 147333 CALIFORNIA AUTO COLLISION.INC. $1.195.08 TRUCK BODY REPAIR 147334 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $1,450.87 SERVICE AGREEMENT 147335 COS MOVING EQUIPMENT $320.02 PLASTIC TOTE BOXES 147336 CAMALI CORP. 5400.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 147337 CANUS CORPORATION $38,378.38 FIBER OPTIC CABLE FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 0928195 PAGE2 - REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID VIMV95 POSTING DATE 10/04/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 147338 CARLETON ENGINEERS $1,260.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES-AIR QUALITY 147339 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $10,964.79 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-M,J-33 147340 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $275.11 OFFICE FURNITURE 147341 CENTURY SAFETY INST.S SUPPLY $4,199.08 SAFETY SUPPLIES 147342 CERFNET $32.50 COMPUTER SERVICES 147343 CHROME CRANKSHAFT,INC. $960.00 PUMP PARTS 147344 CLEMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL $14,708.06 CONSULTANT4ANDFILL PROJECT M07-31-95 147345 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $153.00 SERVICEAGREEMENT 147346 COASTALMOTION $1,332.00 SEMI-ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP FEE 147347 COLE-PALMER INSTRUMENT CO. - MOSS LAB SUPPLIES 147348 COMPUSA,INC. $678.83 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 147349 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST 85,447.40 ELECTRIC PARTS 147350 CONSUMER PIPE $1,384.43 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 147351 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC. $977.81 TOOLS 147352 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $2.235.59 ENGINE PARTS 147353 COUNTERPART ENTERPRISES $1.497.04 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 147354 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 5514.02 ELECTRIC PARTS 147355 D.T.I. $50.00 CHEMICALS rn 147356 DE GUELLE 8 SONS GLASS CO $300.00 SAFETY GLASS X 147357 DEZURIK AND/OR CS CO. $4,521.19 VALVES 147358 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $8.109.33 OFFICE EQUIPMENT to 147359 DISPOSABLE WASTE SYS.B OR JWC ENVIRONMENTAL $244.31 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 147360 ESP NORTH $112.81 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 141361 EASTMAN,INC. $2,705.62 OFFICE SUPPLIES 147362 EDWARDS DIV.OF GS BLDG SYS. 862.35 SERVICEAGREEMENT N 147383 EMERGENCY MGMT NETWORK $520.00 CPRIFIRSTAIDTRAINING 147364 ENCHANTER,INC. $4,200.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.52495 147365 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $1.011.70 LAB SERVICES 147366 FST SAND AND GRAVEL,INC. $769.35 ROAD BASE MATERIALS 147367 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $50.00 AIR FREIGHT 147368 FIBERTRON $1.192.01 FIBER OPTIC CABLE 147369 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $161.21 FILTERS 147370 FIRST CHOICE $389.84 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT 147371 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $101.42 LAB SUPPLIES 147372 FISONS INSTRUMENTS 571,527.35 SERVICE AGREEMENT 147373 CLIFFORD A FORKERT $825.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.641-94 147374 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA 87.62 PHOTO SUPPLIES 147375 FREEDOM IMAGING $59.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 147376 FRY'S ELECTRONICS $8.450.05 ELECTRONIC B COMPUTER SUPPLIES 147377 GET,INC. $210.38 OFFICE SUPPLIES 147378 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $1.610.25 LUMBERJHARDWARE 147379 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $8,696.42 TELEPHONE SERVICES 147380 GIERLICH-MITCHELL,INC. $7,110.12 PUMP PARTS 147381 BEVERLY MAY GILLIAM $395.10 PAYROLL DEDUCTION REIMBURSEMENT 147382 GOUT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOC. $55.00 PUBLICATIONS _ 147383 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $1,077.29 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE =8195 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10/04/95 POS71NO DATE 10/04/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 147394 GRASSY S.T.I. $857.00 ENGINE PARTS 147365 DGA CONSULTANTS $10,707.77 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.64494 147386 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $428.03 TRUCK PARTS 147387 HACH COMPANY $2.939.22 LAB SUPPLIES 147388 HATCH&KIRK,INC. $309.69 TRUCK PARTS 147389 KAULAWAY CONTAINERS $4,055.00 CONTAINER RENTALS 147390 HELPMATES PERSONNEL SERVICES $1,036.08 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 147391 HEWLETT PACKARD $53.88 SERVICEAGREEMENT 147392 HOLMES B NARVER,INC. $38,972.96 ENGINEERING SERVICES MO 9.14-94 147393 HOME DEPOT $84.62 HARDWARE 147394 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $665.90 PAINT SUPPLIES 147395 IPCO SAFETY $3,485.49 SAFETY SUPPLIES 147396 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $79.552.98 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.11.18-92 147397 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $1.080.25 CONNECTORS 147398 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. $571.01 TRUCK PARTS 147399 CLEAN AIR REPORT $585.00 PUBLICATION 147400 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $573.82 BATTERIES 147401 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $67.02 WATER USEAGE M 147402 J2 PRINTING SERVICES $321.10 PRINTING X 147403 JAMES INSTRUMENTS,INC. $1,827.00 ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT ��. 147404 JAMISON ENGINEERING $1,586.98 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 147405 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY. $203.86 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 147406 KENNEDY HYDRAULICS $431.69 MOTOR REPAIRS 147407 KING BEARING,INC. $4.933.03 MACHINE SUPPLIES 147408 KLEINFELDER $1,552.95 OEOTECHNICAL CONSULTING SERVICES W 147409 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $5.755.50 TOOLS 147410 LASERALL CORP. $1.034.81 PRINTER REPAIR 147411 LEE&RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC. $5.297.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES 147412 JAMES E.LENIHAN COMPANY $12,700.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 147413 LEWCO ELECTRIC $T7.27 TRUCK PARTS 147414 LIMITORQUE CORP. 12.883.19 ELECTRIC PARTS 147415 SOCO-LYNCH CORP $117.58 JANITORIAL SERVICES 147416 MACOMCO $484.10 SERVICE AGREEMENT 147417 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $285.266.00 CONSTRUCTION P2.42-2 147418 MCKENNA ENGR.&EQUIP. S272.40 PUMP PARTS 147419 MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. $903.78 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 147420 MIDWAY MFG.&MACHINING $225.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 147421 MISSION INDUSTRIES $4.601.30 UNIFORM RENTALS 147422 MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION $30.359.36 CONSTRUCTION 14-14A 147423 MORELAND&ASSOCIATES $15.843.50 AUDITING SERVICES NO 3-8-95 147424 MORTON SALT S416.57 SALT 147425 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION $461.76 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL FEE 147426 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $70.35 SAFETY FILM RENTALS 147427 NEUTRON $5.264.08 ANIONIC POLYMER M.O.8-10.94 147428 NEW HORIZONS COMPUTER CENTERS,INC. $4,800.00 SOFTWARE TRAINING CLASSES 147429 NICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY $1,514.78 LUBRICANTSIDIESEL FUEL FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 092W95 PAGE4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10/04/95 POSTING DATE 1070U95 WARRANTNO. VENDOR AMOUNT 147430 NORTEL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS $57.53 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS 147431 OI CORPORATION $671.90 LAB SUPPLIES 147432 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $452.79 SAFETY GLASSES 147433 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION - $7.16 OFFICE SUPPLIES 147434 ORACLE CORPORATION $14,287.65 SOFTWARE 147435 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL $1,420.73 CHEMICALS 147436 ORANGE COUNTY FARM SUPPLY $852.38 CHEMICALS 147437 ORANGE COURIER $96.60 COURIER SERVICES 147438 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. $575.78 FITTINGS 147439 OXYGEN SERVICE $1,283.70 SPECIALTY GASES 147440 COUNTY OF ORANGE $735.00 USER FEE CHANGE PROCESSING 147441 OSDOC WORKERS COMP INSURANCE ACCOUNT $2,146.69 WORKERS COMPENSATION REIMBURSEMENT 147442 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $1,269.95 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 147443 PACIFIC PARTS $28,200.58 INSTRUMENT PARTS 147444 PACIFIC BELL $1,354.18 TELEPHONE SERVICES 147445 PASCAL&LUDWIG,INC. 551,191.00 CONSTRUCTION PI-38-2 147446 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $7.890.77 REIMS.PETTY CASH,TRAINING&TRAVEL 147447 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $107.365.50 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3.29.95 M 147448 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS $22.750.00 CONSULTING SERVICE X 147449 PITNEY BOWES $83.69 POSTAGE METER TAPE .�. 147450 POLYMETRICS,INC. $1.262.75 LAB SUPPLIES W 147451 POLYPURE,INC. $34.023.88 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92 147452 POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO. $660.40 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 147453 RAROLD PRIMROSE ICE 5760.00 ICE FOR SAMPLES 147454 PROMINENT FLUID CONTROL,INC. $799.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL t 147455 REISH MARINE STUDIES,INC. 5960.00 OCEAN MONITORING 147456 RELIANCE ELECTRIC $1.575.82 ELECTRIC PARTS 147457 REMEDYTEMP $1,830.40 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 147458 RM MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL ANWOR RITTAL $169.63 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 147459 ROSEMOUNT ANALYRCAL,INC. $868.42 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 147460 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS $487.75 ELECTRIC PARTS 147461 SANTA FE BAG CO. $243.11 FREIGHT 147462 SANWABANK $6.086.42 CONSTRUCTION 14-1-1A 147463 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTL $221.921.19 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.648-94 147464 R.CRAIG SCOTT&ASSOC. $8.922.40 LEGAL SERVICES-PERSONNEL ISSUES 147466 SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS,INC. $232.00 LAB REPAIRS 147466 SELCO PRODUCTS CO. $413.58 METER CONNECTOR 147467 SENTIENT SYSTEMS,INC. $10,800.00 FACILITATOR SERVICES-EXECUTNE RETREAT 147465 SHAMROCKSUPPLY $46.11 TOOLS 147469 SHURELUCK SALES $2.724.55 TOOLSHARDWARE 147470 SMITH-EMERY CO. 5405.00 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-13.96 147471 WATTER SMITH&ASSOCIATES $899.00 EMMISSIONS WORKSHOP 147472 SOUTH COAST WATER 5160.00 LAB SUPPLIES 147473 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. $70,765.05 POWER 147474 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $2,183.29 NATURAL GAS 147475 STAMEN Z.SPASSOFF P.E. $12,800.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19-2 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 09/2895 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 109495 POSTING DATE IGM495 WARRANT NO. VENDOR , AMOUNT 147476 SPECIAL PLASTIC SYSTEMS,INC. $110.71 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 147477 SPECIALIZED PRODUCTS CO. $110.03 OFFICETOOLS 147478 SPIDERS PAPER E85.10 OFFICE SUPPLIES 147479 SUMMIT STEEL E339.41 METAL 147480 TEKTRONIX,INC. $1,285.71 INSTRUMENT PARTS 147481 TELEDYNE ANALYTICAL $153.31 INSTRUMENT PARTS 147482 THEODORE ROBBINS FORD $2.909.24 VEHICLE RENTAL-SUMMER PROGRAM 147483 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $1,482.89 MECHANICAL PARTS 147494 TONY'S LOCK&SAFE SERVICE $90.63 LOCKS&KEYS 147485 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $74.01 TRUCK PARTS 147486 TRUESDAIL LABS $150.00 LAB SERVICES 147487 JG TUCKER&SON,INC. E3,29IA8 INSTRUMENT PARTS 147488 USA BLUE BOOK $358.34 PUBLICATION 147489 UNISOURCEWOR BUTLER PAPER E442.81 OFFICE SUPPLIES 147490 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $53.81 PARCEL SERVICES 147491 UNITED VAN LINES,INC. $8.584.80 RELOCATION SERVICES 147492 VWR SCIENTIFIC $998.83 LAB SUPPLIES 147493 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $2.33 PLUMBING SUPPLIES m 147494 VALLEY DETROIT DIESEL $1,153.46 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES X x 147495 VERNE'S PLUMBING E285.00 PLUMBING SERVICES 147496 VERTEX SYSTEMS E1,836.00 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT 147497 WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION $257.45 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT COURSES 147490 WAXIE $5,533.70 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES Co 147499 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $10,970.50 CAUSTIC SODA&HYPOCHLORIDE M.O.&12-92&4-13-94 I 1475M ROURKE,WOODRUFF&SPRADLIN $124,885.82 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.2-19-92 147501 YELLOW SPRINGS INSTRUMENT CO. $63.79 LAB SUPPLIES 147602 RICHARD YOUNG PRODUCTS $418.29 INSTRUMENT PARTS TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 10/0495 $1,694,387.04 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 09R8/95 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10/04/95 POSTING DATE 1010410 SUMMARY AMOUNT #1 OPER FUND $226.00 #2 OPER FUND $3.725.95 62 CAP FAC FUND $38.780.46 #3 OPER FUND $34.380.66 #3 CAP FAC FUND $46.873.04 #5 OPER FUND $11.618.76 #7 OPER FUND $6,136.01 97 CAP FAC FUND $55.857.59 #11 OPER FUND $861.43 011 CAP FAC FUND $15.000.45 914 OPER FUND $762.17 #14 CAP PAC FUND 847.688.66 05&6 OPER FUND $2,741.59 #5&6 CAP FAC FUND $1.354.37 #6&7 OPER FUND $2,930.72 #7&14 OPER FUND $5,643.39 JT OPER FUND $797,137.03 CORF $461,785.16 X SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $25,657.34 = JT DIST WORKING CAPTAL $135,017.29 &1.694,367.04 l21 Did Cl FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10106195 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10MM6 POSTING DATE 10/06M WARRANT NO. VENDOR - AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 147503 ACORN CONSULTING $1,430.00 CONSULTING SERVICES $1,430.00 SUMMARY AMOUNT JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $1,430.00 $1,430.00 m X x to .. It" v STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, I hereby certify that the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 held on L C%f 14 t- a3 19L, was duly�posted for public inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this .may_, day of (' ( � !` c ' 19%� Penny Kyle, Sei r to c each of the Boards of Directo s pf ounty Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & i4 of Orange County, California 95/FamLF31A