HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-10-25 b COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
October 20, 1995
p,al ssz-24,
1
41 NOTICE OF MEETING
,nnLnge.dd ,
r
1
PC,'Be.82] JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
Fcurown Vallty cA COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
92]2"12]
NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14
10644 treet etl over. OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
44 n Avenue
Fountain Valley.
92]oB]O18t8
WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 25, 1995 - 7:30 P.M.
DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
Mann?nr 108" Ellis Avenue
Agenaes
0 Fountain Valley, California 92708
C1405 The Regular Meeting of the Joint Boards of Directors of County
Brae
aneBrea Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange
Buena Park County, California, will be held at the above location, time and date.
Cypress
Fountain Valley
Fullerton
Nunringmn Beacn
Irvine ✓�
Le Habra Boar cret
Le Palma
Los Alamitos
Newport Beach
Orange
Record:
$en°And
reel Boom m Tentatively-Scheduled Scheduled Uocoming Meetings
Stanton
r ad" STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday,October 25, 1995,
Ville Park at 5:30 pm
Yarba Linda
county or orange OPERATIONS,MAINTENANCE AND
TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE - Wednesday, November 1, 1995,at 5:30 pm
Santee" Dlstnats
Goan Mesa PLANNING,DESIGN AND - Thursday, November 2, 1995, at 5:00 pm,
Garden Grove CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE at Plant No.2
Midway Gty
AD HOC COMMITTEE RE SPACE - Thursday,November 2, 1995,immediately
water Diarricts UTILIZATION STUDY following the Planning, Design and
Irvine Rancb Construction Committee meeting
FINANCE,ADMINISTRATIVE AND
HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE - Wednesday, November 8, 1995, at 5:30 pm
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - Wednesday,November 8, 1995,at 7:00 pm,
immediately following the Finance,
Adminstrative and Human Resources
Committee Meeting
A Public Wastewater and Environmental Management Agency Committed to Protecting the Environment Smce 1954
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
.1 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
10SAA ELLS AVENUE
vo 80.8121
FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92RB910)
111091
JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES
Executive Committee Meetings Joint Board Meetings
October Oct 18, 1995 Oct 25, 1995
November Nov 9, 1995 Nov 15, 1995
December None Scheduled Dec 13, 1995
January Jan 17, 1996 Jan 24, 1996
February Feb 21, 1996 Feb 28, 1996
March Mar 20, 1996 Mar 27, 1996
April Apr 17, 1996 Apr 24, 1996
May May 15, 1996 May 22, 1996
June Jun 19, 1996 Jun 26, 1996
July Jul 17, 1996 Jul 24, 1996
August None Scheduled Aug 28, 1996
September Sep 18, 1996 Sep 25, 1996
October Oct 16, 1996 Oct 23, 1996
r
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
October 19, 1995
phone:
(714)962-2411
To the Chairman and Members
maung address: of the Joint Boards of Directors
P0.Box B127
Fadmin ven A
Valley,c 9272BE C Subject: Board Letter
92
street Address:
10844 Ellis Avenue The following is an update on some of the things that are happening at the Districts. If you
..in
au 92705.701E have u Y P 9 sin%Ame 1e questions on an of the items, lease give me a call.
Tour of Plant No. 2
Mamyar For the directors who were unable to attend the tour in August,there will be another tour on
Agencies Saturday,November 18. We will meet at 10:30 a.m.at Plant No. 1 for brunch,then board the
bus for a tour of Plant No.2 that will last approximately 1-1/2 hours. Please call Clarice
Marcin at 962-2411.extension 3001 to make a reservation.
LNec
Anaheim
eras "Quick Charge" Electric Vehicle Corridor Communities Program
Buena Perk
cypress Attached is a memorandum dated September 27, 1995 on the AQMD's AS 2766"Quick
Fountain Valley Charge"program. As noted,we do not intend to take a lead role but will cooperate with cities
Fullerton
Beech eech
Humingron B in their efforts.
rvine
La Habra
Le Palma General Counsel Opinion on Local Tax Referenda
Los Alamitos
Newport Beach Attached is an October 16, 1995 summary of the recent Supreme Court case involving local
9
Plecenua tax referenda. General Counsel's opinion is that: "The decision has no direct application to
Santa Ana the Sanitation Districts."
Seal Beech
Stanton
TuStln
Vlle Park Reduction of Operations Department Overtime
10rba Linda
count,of Bren r& Attached are copies of two memos on the reduction of overtime by Operations staff at both
treatment plants. As you can see, progress on this issue is being made at both plants.
sanitary olswaa FEMA Funds
Coate Mesa Bard Attached is a copy of a letter supporting our application for approximately S435,000 in
en crave FEMA/California Office of Emergency Services funds to repair damage caused b
Midway city 9 Y P 9 Y
unprecedented high influent wastewater flows last winter. We have been notified that our
water Districts application has been -----'-' "........ "--••'-`--ome time to receive payment. We are
Irvine Ranch also going to request armanent repairs to the ouffall. We will
keep you posted on tl Is.
A Public wastewater and Environmental Management Agency Committed to Protecting the Environment Since 7954
r
Chairman and Members of
the Joint Boards of Directors
Page 2
October 19, 1995
Water Ouality Sampling Results in Huntington Beach
September was the fifth consecutive month in which coliform levels in the northern portion of our surf zone
monitoring area were of concern. In September,Station 33N had no occurrences greater than 230
MPN/100 ml-,Station 9N had one occurrence,and Station 39N had four occurrences over the 230 limit.
The engineering firm of Camp Dresser and McKee, Inc. (CDM)continued its assistance in assessing the
sewerage system at Boise Chico State Beach and the Sunset Beach Sanitary District. To date, CDM has:
1)obtained a copy of drawings for the Boise Chica State Beach sewerage system;2) completed a site
visit to verify accuracy of drawings with regard to location of lift stations, manholes, pressurized and
gravity portions of the system, capacity of holding tanks and frequency of pump activity from these holding
tanks;3) recommended a dye type and calculated the amount of dye needed to perform a system leak
test;4) calculated the travel time for the dye to reach the surf zone based on conductivity of the sand, fluid
head and distance;5)identified the authorizations needed from State Parks Environmental Management
Division for performing a dye test; and,6) followed up with the Sunset Beach Sanitary District's engineer
about its abandoned ouffall at PCH and Warner. CDM's completed report is expected by October 20.
Assuming authorization from the State Parks Environmental Management Division could be obtained by
the end of October,the dye study could be performed early November.
State of California Constitution Revision Commission
Attached is a fax dated October 5, 1995 from CASA updating us on the activities of the Constitution
Revision Commission's activities and notification of a series of hearings that have been scheduled to
receive input regarding the Commission's recommendations on state governance, state budget,schools,
and local governance and financing.
New Employee Committees
Two new employee committees,the Core Values Committee and the Training Advisory Group, have been
formed. Interested employees completed applications and were selected based on a variety of criteria.
Blake Anderson is overseeing the Core Values Committee,and they recently spent 1-12 days developing
goals and objectives. Judy Wilson has oversight responsibility for the Training Advisory Group. A 1/2-day
session is planned for the near future to commence the development of a comprehensive training
program.
Accident Frequency Rates
At the October 4, 1995 OMITS Committee meeting,the Safety and Emergency Response Division reported
the quarterly accident frequency rates. Lost Work Day cases, Severity(the
number of lost work days),Total Injury(OSHA recordable),and Near Miss accidents were reported.
Director Swan asked that staff also provide information on Vehicle Accidents. This information is
attached.
Chairman and Members of
the Joint Boards of Directors
Page 3
October 19, 1995
Orange County Operational Area Agreement
The Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS)was established in 1992 by Senate Bill 1841
to provide a framework for responding to and managing emergencies and disasters involving multiple
jurisdictions and/or agencies. The County is required to establish an Opeational Area,which consists of
all the political subdivisions of the County,for emergency management by December 1, 1995. The cities
and special districts of Orange County have been invited to participate in the Operational Area Agreement
prepared by the Orange County Emergency Management Council. Districts'staff is currently reviewing
the Agreement.
This Agreement will be a starling point for the County, cities and special districts to develop a plan to
coordinate,communicate, respond and recover from emergencies and disasters. During the next few
weeks,you may hear more about the Operational Area Agreement from your respective city staffs. This
issue will be included on the November Board meeting agenda.
Clean Up of Plant No.2
During the August OMTS Committee tour of Plant No.2,the Directors expressed concern about the two
boneyards and the surplus equipment storage area. The Districts'boneyard is located north of the drying
beds along the Santa Ana River. This area has been cleaned up and staff is investigating the possibility of
a berm to shield the boneyard from the bike trail on the river bank.
On October 17. bids were received to remove the surplus equipment located between the Santa Ana River
and the drying beds. This includes old internal combustion engines that were removed as part of the
electrification of Plant No.2. The bids are being analyzed and an award should be made in the next week.
The other boneyard is located at the southeast corner of the plant. This area is not a boneyard, but rather
a staging area for the contractor working on the expansion of the secondary treatment facilities.
Engineering is working with the contractor to make this area more presentable.
Painting the Surge Towers
At a recent OMTS Committee meeting, Joint Vice Chair Swan asked staff about painting the surge tower
to improve their appearance. Staff contacted Dupont for assistance with putting together the
specifications. Samples of the existing paint were sent to a lab,and the lab determined that the paint
contained, among other things, excessive levels of cadmium, lead and zinc. These elements are
considered hazardous and require special disposal methods,employee protective equipment when
removing the paint,as well as environmental monitoring. The estimated cost to remove the paint because
of the extraordinary measures required is estimated to be$45,000 per tower.
The painting of the surge tower is included in a future project,Job No.J-34-1,which is slated to come to
the Boards in January,assuming receipt of Coastal Commission approval in December. Because of the
cost,potential risk, and the fact that the work is already included in another project,staff is recommending
against painting the towers at this time.
Chairman and Members of
the Joint Boards of Directors
Page 4
October 19, 1995
Strategic Plan Update
Attached you will find a time line for the update of the Districts'Strategic Plan. To keep the Board
informed along the way,and to have policy input at critical points in the plants development,we are
recommending quarterly Board Workshops. These are shown in bold on the time line.
This is a complex piece of work involving a number of special studies. Our schedule anticipates securing
the EPA NPDES permit no later than September 1996. The permit will establish treatment and
reclamation conditions which will need to be considered in projecting the Districts' long-term capital needs.
Adoption,including certification of the EIR,is anticipated by January 1998.
Also attached Is a summary of the elements of the new Strategic Plan including highlights of the 1995-96
program and estimated costs.
Decrease in Chemical Prices Used at the Districts
Industry forecasts point toward decreases in the most expensive three chemicals(ferric chloride, caustic
soda and hydrogen peroxide) used to operate the treatment plants. These chemicals make up over 80%
of the Districts budgeted chemical expenditure of$5.2 million.
The ferric chloride bid award, approved by the Board last month,reflected a unit cost reduction that
resulted in a bid of$600,000 under the budget estimate. Caustic soda prices are forecast to decrease 10
percent,and availability of hydrogen peroxide is increasing which could yield future unit cost decreases.
New Lighting Energy Conservation Study with SCE
Southern California Edison (SCE) and staff have begun a lighting conservation study of the two treatment
plants. SCE provides free consulting studies with recommendations on haw to cost-effectively reduce
electricity consumption in buildings,tunnels and treatment plant lighting.
Southern California ENVEST Energy Conservation Study
The Southern California Edison (SCE) ENVEST energy conservation study has started. SCE selected
HDR Engineering, an environmental consultant,to do the feasibility study. A draft report is due from HDR
on December 1, 1995,with completion about two weeks later.
Staff is working with SCE to develop an agreement to secure the present phase of ENVEST funds with a
means for the OMTS Committee to review the feasibility study recommendations prior to proceeding to the
project design phase. The present phase of ENVEST funds that have up to a 20%subsidy for projects,
ends December 31, 1995.
Chairman and Members of
the Joint Boards of Directors
Page 5
October 19, 1995
New Lab Manager
Nancy Wheatley, Director of Technical Services, has announced that Dr.Samuel Mowbray has accepted
the position of Environmental Laboratory Manager effective October 23, 1995. Sam has over fifteen
years'experience, most recently with IOLAB Corporation, a division of Johnson&Johnson,an ophthalmic
medical products company specializing in devices and pharmaceuticals. He was most recently Senior
Regulatory Affairs Administrator, and Manager of Toxicology and Research Services.
Sam has a Ph.D.in Micro/Molecular Biology from UCLA, and held post-doctoral fellowships with ICN
Nucleic Acid Research Institute-Biochemistry, and Brown University Department of Biological Sciences-
Molecular Biology. He received his B.A. in Bacteriology from UCLA. We feel fortunate to have a person
with these credentials,and look forward to his leadership.
Change in Meeting Schedule for November
As a final note,I want to remind you that the November meeting schedule has changed, as follows:
OMITS Committee November 1 at 5:30 p.m.
PDC Committee November 2 at 5 p.m. at Plant 2 Operations Center
Ad Hoc Committee re Space
Utilization Study November 2 following PDC Committee
FAHR Committee November 8 at 5:30 p.m.
Executive Committee November 8 at 7 p.m.
Stewing Committee November 15 at 5:30 p.m.
Joint Board November 15 at 7:30 p.m.
Respectfully,
Donald F. McIntyre /
General Manager
DFMjiIWt�w nwvrmeanng.Lmnozs0
Enclosures: Memo dated September 27, 1995 on"Quick Charge"Electric Vehicles
Memo dated October 16, 1995 re Santa Clara County Local Transportation
Authority v. Guardino (local tax referenda)
Memos dated September 21 and 27, 1995 on reduction of overtime
October 9, 1995 letter to FEMA re recovery of disaster-related expenses
FAX from CASA dated October 5, 1995
Accident Frequency Rate Report
Time Line for Strategic Plan Update
Elements of Our Strategic Plan
9
u
ro m
September 27, 1995
MEMORANDUM
TO: Blake P. Anderson
Chief Operations Officer
FROM: Edwin E. Hodges
Director of Maintenance
SUBJECT: "Quick Charge" Electric Vehicle Corridor Communities Program
At Monday's Department Head meeting, we discussed the concept of participating in the
AQMD's AB 2766 project for Electric Vehicles. I stated that I do not feel this program is
as good a fit for us as the CNG project was. However, before we make the final
determination, we need to make sure we all know the same amount of information. The
following is the "Readers Digest' version of everything I know (on this subject):
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
The goal of the "Quick Charge' Electric Vehicle (EV) Corridor Communities Program is to
assist communities to prepare for electric vehicles by testing the consumer market for EVs
and demonstrating the infrastructure, permitting process, and coordination that will be
necessary for the smooth introduction of larger quantities of EVs. The EV Condor
Communities Program supports the deployment of electric vehicles along designated
corridors and within speck communities that have committed to this deployment to be
"EV-readya by encouraging the lease/purchase of EVs, installation of a public charging
infrastructure and adoption of"EV-friendly" ordinances and procedures.
THE CORRIDORS
Three corridors have been designated as the initial focal points for this project.
1. The "405" corridor, which begins in Sherman Oaks and ends in Mission Viejo.
2. The "10" corridor, which begins in Santa Monica and ends in Redlands.
CSDOC 0 P.O.9a.9127 • Foun l a In Valley,CA 92728.8127 • (714(962 2411
Blake P. Anderson
Page 2 of 4
September 27, 1995
3. The '215/91" corridor, which begins in Temecula/Riverside and ends in Gardena.
SELECTION OF THE EV CORRIDOR COMMUNITIES
To participate in the program, the general purpose local government must join together in
a cluster of three or more contiguous jurisdictions or entities. This clustering will allow a
charging infrastructure network to begin to grow. Additionally, to be an EV Corridor
Community, the jurisdictions within the clusters must commit to certain activities that will
support and facilitate the "Quick Charge" Program. These activities are classified as:
minimum participation requirements, necessary for consideration as a designated
participant in the EV Corridor Community Program; discretionary activities, which are
those that are highly valued and weigh heavily in the consideration of the EV Corridor
Community designation, These activities are left to the discretion of each specific
jurisdiction.
MINIMUM PARTICIPATION REQUIREMENTS
• Streamline permit process to allow installation of electric vehicle infrastructure
within 72 hours of vehicle purchase or lease.
• Adopt Electric Vehicle National Electric Code Revision and Uniform Building Code
Revision.
• Train emergency response personnel (police, fire, etc.)
• Develop a plan to require new residential and commercial development to be
electric vehicle-ready.
Match funding will be available for the following discretionary activities:
• Develop a consortium-approach to the electric vehicle program, with participating
general purpose local governments partnering with municipal utilities, and private
and nonprofit entities such as major employers, universities, airports, and
automobile dealerships.
• Demonstration of innovation in encouraging electric vehicles, such as offering
parking incentives or Rule 1501 incentives.
• Lease/purchase vehicles for general purpose local government fleets.
V
I
Blake P. Anderson
Page 3 of 4
September 27, 1995
• Provide public education regarding such subjects as safety.
Funding may be possible for the following other Discretionary Activities:
• Provide municipal infrastructures at locations such as parking lots and Metrolink
stations.
• Provide free or preferential electric vehicle parking.
• Allow a utility user tax exemption for electric vehicles.
• Provide incentives, such as density bonuses and planning fee waivers, for
developers who accommodate electric vehicle needs.
• Strive for state and federal incentives, such as electric vehicle use of high-
occupancy vehicle of high occupancy vehicle lanes or presumptive conformity with
the California Environmental Quality Act for developments with electric vehicle
support components.
• Establish incentives for larger employers of fleet operators to install electric vehicle
infrastructure.
• Co-fund employer parking infrastructure, if it is accessible to the public.
• Assist employers in applying for Rule 1501 equivalency.
• Co-fund residential and commercial infrastructure.
• Promote electric vehicle utilization to residents and large employers.
• Conduct city fleet evaluation and assist employers with conducting fleet evaluation
for alternative fuel vehicles.
• Publicize electric vehicle efforts and activities.
PROCESS FOR SELECTING THE EV CORRIDOR COMMUNITIES
The Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) to the MSRC will be responsible for the initial
review of the applications for participation in the EV Corridor Communities Program.
Recommendations by the TAC will then be considered for approval by the MSRC.
Blake P. Anderson
Page 4 of 4
September 27, 1995
SCHEDULE
Implementation of the Corridor Communities Program will consist of several steps. This is
to assure coordination with the auto buy-down program, allow time for local coalition to be
formed, and to assure availability of necessary infrastructure.
1. October 1995
Program announcement: Information about the proposed program sent to all South
Coast cities and counties to generate interest and enthusiasm in participating as
the EV Corridor Communities program.
2. December 1995/January 1996
Applications for EV Corridor Community designation released. RFP for funding for
discretionary projects released. Project manager works with interested cities and
counties, COG's, multi-jurisdictional interests, and others to provide additional
information and to help form coalitions.
3. March 1996 (This may get moved up to February)
Applications and response to RFP due. Review by TAC begins. MSRC action
scheduled.
4. April 1996
Cities designated by the MSRC.
5. May 1996
MSRC action on Discretionary Project applications.
Based upon this information, it seems to me that If we should choose to participate in this
program, our role would be in support of one of our member cities and not as the lead
agency. I would, however, be interested in getting your views on this subject.
EEH:cm
R:IWPDOCWMEH WLT.FUEUFVBPA
c: D. McIntyre
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
W ORANGE COUNTY,CATIFORNIA
10 E 8AVENUE
P.O.eOX e19
FOUMAIN VALLEY,CAUFORNIA 9272"19
September28, 1995 (714)9 -2411
MEMORANDUM
TO: Plant No. 1 Opara ons Staff
I
FROM: John Finias ,
Chief Operator t
SUBJECT: Overtime
After reading a memorandum from Doug Cook on Plant No. 2 overtime, I made a similar
review for the same time period.
I am delighted to report that Plant No. 1 also had a significant reduction of overtime for
the first eight months of the calendar year 1995. These reductions were accomplished
with staffing below authorized levels. The efforts and creativity at all levels of the
operations staff made this possible and I want to extend my thanks for your cooperation.
In the first eight months of 1994 (January-August) Plant No. 1 averaged 116 hours of
overtime due to holidays (holiday overtime is the minimum staffing required to maintain
plant operations on a holiday) and 474 hours per month of regular overtime (regular
overtime is the combined total of overtime generated due to scheduled and
unscheduled personal leave, comp. time, training,jury duty, etc.). For the same period
in 1995, holiday overtime averaged 107 hours per month and regular overtime averaged
252 hours per month. This is a reduction of 8% in holiday overtime and a 47%
reduction for regular overtime for the eight months.
JPF:cf
RAWPD0CU/80UPFW9 96.RJ0
Attachment
c: Don McIntyre
Black Anderson
Bob Ooten
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY. CAUFORNIA
September21, 1995 t�
on waetn
wurrraH vaur,'.wiwmaa�rzeatn
ntneazant
MEMORANDUM
TO: Plant 2 Operations Staff
FROM: Doug Cook
Chief Operator
SUBJECT: Overtime
I want to commend and thank the Plant 2 Operations Staff for their efforts in
minimizing overtime at Plant 2. From January 1994 through August 1994, an
average of 499 hours per month of regular overtime and an additional 153 hours per
month of holiday overtime was issued. For the same period in 1995, regular
overtime dropped to an average of 182 hours per month and holiday overtime
dropped to an average of 126 hours per month. This was a 63% decrease in regular
overtime and a 17% decrease in holiday overtime. This decrease took place despite
a reduction in Plant 2 Operations Staff.
The reason for the success of this effort is your active participation in working with
your supervisor to schedule your time off so as to minimize it' s affect on your
respective shifts and your willingness to work at lower minimum staffing levels. This
is exactly the type of thing that will allow us to run this facility at lower costs and
greater economy.
Once again, I want to congratulate the Plant 2 Operations Staff for their effort in
reducing overall Districts' cost.
DC:dm
R:VAEMOStOCOVIME.W PO
C: B. Anderson
R. Dolan
Plant 2 Supervisors
1BAIS/95 12:55:38 -> 7149GM56 Donald llclntw� Page 001
OCT-05-95 THU 10:54 P. 01
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION o/ SANITATION AGENCIES
926L6ame6u:ie140e 6acreaa:Nq GA9a614 T (916)446-NO-FAM(916)4484MB
d
DATE: October 5, 1995
TO: CASA Member Ageodn
FROM: Mike Dillon&Bobbi Larson
SUBJECT: CONSTI'I MON REVISION COMMISSION-UPDATE
Some of you may have seen a recent newsletter article indicating that the California Constitution
Revision Commission is proposing to eliminate special districts. As you know, CASA has been
monitoring the Commission's activities closely, and yesterday we met with Executive Director Fred
Silva. Ford told us that the local government piece of the preliminary report to the Legislature is still
being drafted, but it will not call for elimination of special districts across the board The
Commission's theme, according to Fred, has been to eliminate institutional barriers to load
governance and allow organizational decisions to be nude a the local level via local community
charters.
The chatter concept is still being developed, but is not intended to be imposed upon otlicr local
agencies by the county(ward of supervisors. The idea is for the local agencies within each county to
get together and come up with a charter that specifies which services will be provided by which local
agencies. These diartm would also include new 'home rule' powers, including nosing authority and
the power to allocate sales and property tax revenues among local agencies. The proposal will also
include an initiative provision allowing eitiuns to re,writc a community charter and place it on the
ballot
The Commission will hold a series of hearings to receive input regarding its recommendations can state
governance, state budget, schools, and local govcmance and financing. The htarngs are scheduled as
follows:
San Francisco: October 14 San Diego: November 3
Long Beack: November 30 Sacramento: December 7
There will also be a series of video confermoes at designated locations around the star:(audit as
community colleges and libraries) during November and early December. The Commission plays to
submit its final report to the Legislature in late January or early February, followed closely by the
introduction of a single bill which will include all the proposalt. The Commission apparently hopes
to have a spociai legislative policy committee established to consider the package of reforms
We will continue to bring you updates as the Commission's local government Mfganiration
proposals evolve.
A�.iDf
" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
F
October 9, 1995
b
9822
I` 41
k °p14j 1
Marc A. Johnson, P.E.
ailing address: Federal Emergency Management Agency
P.O.Bo.8
127
i;Eo.meh.veney,ON 297 Marengo Avenue
8272"127 Pasadena, California 91101
::..street address:
ilrFouielo lvena cn SUBJECT: Disaster Number: FEMA-1044-DR
9270&7018 Project Application Number: 059-91108
Subgrantee: County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
~._
gemees The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (Districts) provide".;.. M. .
• wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal services for more than two
million people in metropolitan Orange County. The Districts are comprised
:' an.halm of nine independent sanitation districts that operate through a Joint Powers
Brea Agreement with two common wastewater treatment plants and one common
1 Baena Par` ocean disposal system. The Districts treat approximately 235 million
Cypress
��•Fountain Vey gallons per day of wastewater that is discharged five miles off the coast of
Fullerton
Huntington Beach Huntington Beach at a depth of 200 feet.
Beach 9 P
Irvine
Le Habra
L e Palma During FEMA-1044-DR, the Joint Works Treatment Plants and Disposal
Los Alamitos Facilities received unprecedented high influent wastewater flows, which
New ort Beach
Crangs damaged the Districts' Joint Ocean Outfall Treated Wastewater Disposal
Record. System and caused other disaster-related problems. As a result, the
Sense Ana
Seel Beach Districts incurred significant costs to date and will incur additional costs in
B°"w" the future.
Tusun
Vids Park
Moro. Lind. Pursuant to our meeting on September 25, 1995, the following information
County of Orange is provided to facilitate the completion of the Districts' Disaster Survey
Reports:
Said., Districts
Coats Mese 1. Damage to the Ocean Ouffall (Outfall) was suspected due to a
Garden Grow drop in pumping pressures. The Ouffall was investigated and it
midway city P P 9 P 9
was found that the end-gate had opened, which is required
Water Dleu;tte under the Districts' National Pollution Discharge Elimination
/here Ranch System (NPDES) permit to be closed at all times. Temporary
repairs were completed as quickly as possible. The cost of this
temporary work was $131,110.87 (enclosure 1).
A Public Westewater and Environmental Management Agency Con m rated to Protecung the Environment Since 1354
Marc A. Johnson, P.E.
Page 2 of 3
October 9, 1995
2. After it was determined that the end-gate had suffered damage,
a permanent repair investigation was initiated. In addition, to
ensure the integrity of the line, plans are being prepared for an
investigation of the interior of the Outfall. The cost of the
permanent repairs, as well as, the cost of the interior
investigation of the Outfall have not yet been determined.
3. Additional process chemicals were used to protect human
health and the environment, as a result of the high flow and
damage incurred to the Outfall. The cost of the additional
chemicals was $64,339.43 (enclosure 2).
4. Damage to the pumps and motors of the Ocean Outfall Booster
Station was suspected due to loud noise, vibration, and
overheating during peak pumping periods. The Districts
retained a consultant to investigate the condition of the pumps
and motors (enclosure 3). OES/FEMA have a copy of the
engineering reports. The cost of this work was approximately
$69,400. A detailed cost breakdown and supporting
documentation will follow during the week of October 16, 1995.
5. Excess influent wastewater flow increased the Districts' energy
usage considerably. The Districts spent $148,607.88 for
additional energy (enclosure 4).
6. Additional staff was required to maintain and repair Districts'
facilities during the disaster. Approximately $21,661.18 was
spent on labor for storm-related activities (enclosure 5).
The Districts have incurred costs of approximately $435,119.36, not
including permanent repairs to the Outfall, as a result of FEMA-1044-DR.
The Outfall is one of the most critical components of the Districts' facilities.
It is highly regulated and repairs must be completed under strict guidelines
and NPDES permit requirements. The Districts intend to file a supplement
for the additional cost of the permanent repairs to the Outfall.
Marc A. Johnson, P.E.
Page 3 of 3
October 9, 1995
If you have any questions or require additional information regarding this
matter, please do not hesitate to contact me at (714) 962-2411 extension
2143.E
Daniel Tunnicliff
Safety and Emergency Response Engineer
DET:dt
g:\ry%NunnidAmac\1044_oes.N
Enclosures
c: Blake Anderson w/o enclosures
Judy Wilson w/o enclosures
Terri Josway w/o enclosures
Near Miss Accidents
25
Cn
,.
c 20
a)
v 15 01993
Q 1994
O b W 1995
`m 10
6 b
LY 4 4 y 4
:3 5 6
Z s '
0
1 st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr Total
Quarter By Calendar Year
A near miss accident is an accident that does not result in an injury. By investigating near miss accidents,
unsafe acts and/or unsafe conditions can be corrected.
Severity Rate
Lost Work Days and Restricted Work Days
200 Industry
Average
ee
163
150 01993
E:1 1994
E
M 1995
100
L- Mindustry
a)
/>/�� Average
//(�D d0
v' 9B
50 s �+
0
1 st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr Total
Quarter By Calendar Year
Severity Rate = Number of Lost Work Days + Restricted Days x 200.000
Number of Manhours
The severity rate provides a measurement of the seriousness of the lost work day causes.
Vehicle Accidents
8
aD 6
6
5 -
01993
U a;•
Q 4 1994
O M 1995
F T•,
a� 3
� 2
Hy � FF
o § o
0
1 st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr Total
Quarter By Calendar Year
Lost Work Day Case Frequency Rates
1 Industry
Average
e
8 _
N 01993
El
a
6 1994
U M 1995
a a a
Industry
4 Average
2 2 2
lL
2 -
0 -
1 st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr Total
Quarter By Calendar Year
LWDC = Number of Lost Work Day Cases x 200,000
Frequency Rate Number of Manhours
The lost work day case frequency rate includes all accidents where the employee is unable
to work or unable to perform all functions of their job.
OSHA Total Injury Frequency Rates
Lost Work Day Cases and Other Medical Treatment Cases
20 Industry
Average
is
15 +a 01993
c
Ir 01994
>' M 1995
a a
C 10 a e,; a
a) M Industry
:3 5
5J Average
l 5
5
2
0 1T
1 st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr Total
Quarter By Calendar Year
Total Injury = Number of Injuries x 200.000
Frequency Rate Number of Manhours
The total injury frequency rate includes all accidents which are recorded on the OSHA 200 log.
TIME LINE
BOARD INVOLVEMENT/CONSULTANT DEADLINES
STRATEGIC PLAN
November 1995 Board Action on SOO and RFP for three projects: Ocean outfall,
Peak Hydraulic Flow Study and Financial Analysis
December 1995 Staff receives qualification and completes evaluation.
January 1996 Board Workshop -
Overview of Three Project Elements and Time Line for
Strategic Plan.
Staff mails Ri to qualified firms.
February 1996 Staff receives RFPs and evaluates proposals.
March 1996 OMITS and PDC Committees take action to award contracts for
three projects.
April 1996 Board Workshop -
Overview of Key Policy Issues for Updated Strategic Plan.
June 1996 Consultant submits draft report on ocean outfall.
July 1996 Board Workshop -
Ocean Outfall - Considerations of Options.
August 1996 Completion of Plans and Specs for outfall gate repairs.
September 1996 Secure permit from EPA.
Board action on SOO and RFP on Treatment and Reuse Study.
Initiate CEOA compliance on ocean ouffall rehab.
Consultant submits demographic data, land use projections.
October 1996 Board Workshop -
Forecasts - Demographic Analysis and Its Implications -
What's changed since 19897
November 1996 Board action to award contract on Treatment and Reuse Study
based on 9/96 permit conditions.
Consultant submits draft report with fee categories, relationship
amounts.
December 1996 Begin preparation of draft report on Treatment and Reuse Study.
Time Line
Page 2
October 11, 1995
January 1997 Board Workshop -
Capital Facilities Charges - Financial Analysis.
February 1997 Complete CEQA compliance on ocean outfall.
March 1997 Begin preparation of Program EIR for Stategic Plan.
April 1997 Board Workshop -
Participating the Public - Outreach Strategies for
Communications - Review Decision Model.
Consultant completes Hydraulic Analysis.
Consultant completes Draft Master Plans on Flow, MI, Peaking
future production techniques and trunk sewer analysis.
Consultant completes Final report on sanitary service charge,
capital facilities, connection charge and excess capacity charge.
June 1997 Board Workshop -
Presentation on Final Draft of Peak Hydraulic
Discharge; Launching Public Outreach Plan.
Jul - Dec 1997 Outreach - Public discussion.
August 1997 Circulate draft EIR on Strategic Plan. Complete draft report on
Treatment and Reuse.
September 1997 Board Workshop -
Update on Public Dialogue Issues Requiring Resolution and
Direction.
Hold public hearing on draft EIR.
November 1997 Complete Strategic Plan Document.
December 1997 Complete Final EIR
January 1998 Board adoption of Strategic Plan; Certification of EIR
NOTE: This timeline is based on assumption that an approved permit is secured
by September 1996. The permit will provide guidance on Treatment and
Reuse thresholds which will be critical factors in financial analysis and
environmental evaluation.
JAW:cmc
JAWP'�OG1GMVMLSaMTYWL E
ELEMENTS OF OUR STRATEGIC PLAN
■ Project land use and population.
■ Perform flow projections.
■ Determine Inflow/Infiltration (I & 1) contributions.
■ Determine collection system requirements.
■ Analyze alternate peak flow management options.
■ Determine facility sizing requirements for peak flows.
TREATMENT/REUSE REQUIREMENTS
p Project ocean quality objectives -permit conditions
O Project water reclamation needs, process requirements
and space needed.
O Determine treatment process requirements, associated
costs and plant layout alternatives through 2050.
O Recommend long term management plan for biosolids.
< f SUPPORT SUBJECTS,
0 Estimate staff and space requirements for administrative,
operations and maintenance functions.
0 Review source control, ocean monitoring and
laboratory needs.
0 Estimate O & M and capital needs and recommend
a financial plan.
0 Describe programmatic options and asset management
opportunities.
1of4
STRATEGIC PLAN: NEAR TERM
Highlights of the 1995-96 Program
PROJECT NO. 1 : .. .REHABILITATION OF OUTFACES
p Investigate the interior condition of our 120-inch,
five (5) mile operating outfall.
Clean the interior of the 120-inch outfall.
0 Repair both outfalls, open plugged ports, etc.
El Analyze option to intentionally open 120-inch outfall
end gate during peak flows, discuss with Regulators.
0 Make permanent repair to 120-inch outfall end gate
(gate was damaged during January 1995 storms)
PROJECT NO. 2: MANAGEMENT OF PEAK HYDRAULIG DISCHARGE ;
p Develop land use and population data for determination
of daily flows, peak flows and Collection System needs.
Land use data to be shared with financial study (below).
9 Perform I & I study.
IS Determine if peak flows can be economically reduced.
0 Review methods to retard peak flows.
0 Analyze peak flow ocean discharge options.
V Conduct outfall alternative decision model with
Directors, Regulators and other interested citizens
and environmental groups.
2 of 4
STRATEGIC PLAN: NEAR TERM
Highlights of the 1995-96 Program
PROJECT NO. 3: : . . DETERMINATION OF FINANCIAL CHARGES
With land use data developed from Project No. 2,
develop multiple land use categories that are tied to
the Orange County Tax Collector's base.
O Review short term financial needs and compare to
existing Capital Facilities Connection Charge; Excess
Capacity Charge; and annual Sanitary Sewer Service
Charge.
0 Evaluate near term charge alternatives.
E3 Review draft information with stakeholders and make
final recommendations to Directors.
0 Note: As a part of Project No. 4, as long term facility
needs are redefined, this issue will be revisited for
developing a long term financial charge program.
3 of 4
1 �
STRATEGIC PLAN
Estimated Costs
ITEM PROJECT MASTER PLAN
COST COST
1995-96 PROGRAM - NEAR TERM
■ PROJECT NO. 1:
Rehabilitate Existing Ocean Outfalls .................. $ 630,000
■ PROJECT NO. 2:
Management of Peak Hydraulic Discharge ..............................................$ 1,150,000
■ PROJECT NO. 3:
Financial Analysis ........................................................ $ 390,000
FUTURE PROGRAMS
■ PROJECT NO. 4:
Treatment, Reuse ................................................................................................. $ 500,000
Support/Staffing .................................................................................................. $ 350,000
CEQA Compliance................................................................................................. $ 500,000
Public Participation................................................................................................ $ 250,000
TOTAL $ 2,750,000
(For comparison purposes, the 1989 Master Plan cost approximately$4,500,000)
4 of 4
Y
y
AGENDA
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708
REGULAR MEETING
OCTOBER 25, 1995 -7:30 P.M.
r" 18111 �aa w-
i In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2f VII..
agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the Districts'Administrative Offices nollesg 1�'al�.y<<
than'72 hours.prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to V°
each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. 1
.In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to he submitted to the ad' [Q5 lip
for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 549542(b) as an
emergency Item or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the ',9
tt attention of the Districts subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a �
Iupplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date 4� 'i91Rk6
(1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation
(2) Roll call
(3) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies
relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders)
(4) Appointment of Chair pro tem, if necessary
(5) Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Boards on specific agenda
items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by
the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion
and remarks may be limited to five minutes.
Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this
agenda cannot have action taken by the Boards of Directors except as
authorized by Section 54954.2(b).
10/25/95
V=
(6) The Joint Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports 0
on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are
for information only and require no action by the Directors.
(a) Report of Joint Chair, consideration of Resolutions or commendations,
presentations and awards
(b) Report of General Manager
(c) Report of General Counsel
(7) EACH DISTRICT
If no corrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will be deemed
approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair:
District 1 - September 27, 1995 regular
District 2 - September 27, 1995 regular
District 3 - September 27, 1995 regular
District 5 - September 27, 1995 regular
District 6 - September 27, 1995 regular
District 7 - September 27, 1995 regular
District 11 - September 27, 1995 regular
District 13 - September 27, 1995 regular
District 14 - September 27, 1995 regular
(8) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and
individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that
vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director
expresses a desire to vote differently for any District.)
10/04/95 &
09/20/95 10/06/95
ALL DISTRICTS
Joint Operating Fund - $620,167.44 $798,567.03
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 560,310.76 461,765.16
Joint Working Capital Fund - 115,727.22 135,017.29
Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 52,888.38 25,857.34
DISTRICT NO. 1 - 6,317.55 225.00
DISTRICT NO. 2 - 14,322.53 42,506.41
DISTRICT NO. 3 - 234,237.02 81,253.70
DISTRICT NO. 5 - 18,211.07 11,618.76
DISTRICT NO 6 - 1.232.01 0.00
DISTRICT NO. 7 - 7,325.96 62,003.57
DISTRICT NO, 11 - 336,183.65 15,861.88
DISTRICT NO. 13 - 47.18 0.00
DISTRICT NO. 14 - 1.952.52 48,450.83
DISTRICTS NOS 5 & 6 JOINT - 121,382.77 4,095.96
DISTRICTS NOS. 6 &7 JOINT - 0.00 2,930.72
DISTRICTS NOS 7 & 14 JOINT - 0.00 5 646 3.39
$2.090.326.06 $1,695,797.04
-2-
10/25/95
4
(9) CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEMS 9(a) THROUGH 9(c)
All matters placed on the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or I
further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the
consent calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there
will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be I
enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for
resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent i
i calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business.
.Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon !
recognition by the chair, stale their name, address and designate by letter the item to be
i removed from the consent calendar.
I 1
The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar.
Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent
calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows:
ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Consideration of the following actions relative to Purchase of Three Cab
and Chassis with Crane Mounted Service Body, Specification No. V-008:
(1) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter dated
September 28, 1995, from Maurice J. Sopp Truck Center, apparent
low bidder, requesting that they be allowed to withdraw their bid for
said purchase due to a mathematical error and approving said
request.
(2) Consideration of motion receiving and filing bid tabulation and
recommendation and awarding Purchase of Three Cab and
Chassis with Crane Mounted Service Body, Specification
No. V-008, to Mike McCarthy Buick & GMC Truck, for a total
amount not to exceed $124,346.37, plus sales tax.
-3-
10/25/95
(9) ALL DISTRICTS (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued)
(b) Consideration of the following actions regarding the transportation and
disposal of residual solids:
(1) Consideration of motion approving and authorizing the General
Manager to execute Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement with
Falcon Disposal Services, Inc., for transportation of residual solids
for disposal within a 40-mile radius, extending the agreement for a
six-month period beginning October 30, 1995, at the existing
contract unit price of$260.00 per load for grit and screening, and
$12.08 per ton for sludge, in form approved by General Counsel
(Estimated six-month cost is $100,000.00).
(2) Consideration of motion approving and authorizing the General
Manager to execute Amendment No. 4 to the Agreement with BKK
Corporation for interim residual solids disposal, extending the
agreement for a six-month period beginning October 30, 1995, at
the existing contract unit price of$31.38 per ton for grit, screenings,
and sludge, in form approved by General Counsel (Estimated six-
month cost is $65,000.00).
DISTRICT 1
(c) Consideration of motion approving Settlement Agreement with
Alphanetics, Inc. and Francisco Lopez, for administrative penalties in the
amount of$42,000.00 for wastewater discharge violations, in a form
approved by General Counsel.
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
(10) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any
-4-
10/25/95
(11) ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Minutes of the Executive Committee
(1) Receive and file draft Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization Study
Committee Minutes for the meetings held on July 14, 1995 and
September 13, 1995.
(2) Receive and file draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting
held on September 27, 1995.
(3) Receive and file draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical
Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on October 4,
1995.
(4) Receive and file draft Planning, Design and Construction
Committee Minutes for the meeting held on October 5, 1995.
(5) Receive and file draft Finance, Administration and Human
Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on October 11,
1995.
(6) Receive and file draft Ad Hoc Committee re Landfill Acquisition
Committee Minutes for the meeting held on October 18, 1995.
(7) Receive and file draft Executive Committee Minutes for the meeting
held on October 18, 1995.
(b) Consideration of the following actions recommended by said committees:
(1) OMTS95-043 Consideration of the following actions relative to the
Professional Services Agreement with Communications
Performance Group, Inc. for design of an Integrated Emergency
Response Plan (Specification No. P-166):
(a) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the
Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee
certification of the final negotiated fee with Communications
Performance Group, Inc. for said services.
(b) Consideration of Resolution No. 95-104, approving said
agreement with Communications Performance Group, Inc.
for said services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor, including
overhead, plus fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed
$125,000.00 for the 1995-96 fiscal year, and a total cost not
to exceed $312,232.00.
-5-
[ITEM (11)(b) CONTINUED ON PAGE 6]
10/25/95
(11) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 5)
(b) (2) OMTS95-045 Consideration of motion authorizing an increase in
Districts' expenditures for in-house laboratory analyses supporting
the Joint Ultraviolet Pilot Project with Orange County Water District,
increasing the Districts' cost for direct labor and material for an
additional amount of$17,000.00, increasing the total authorized
amount from $40,000 to an amount not to exceed $57,000.
(3) PDC95-31 Consideration of motion to approve, in concept, the
Partnering Charter and the Value Engineering Clause to the
contract with Margate Construction, Inc. for Secondary Treatment
Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36-2.
(4) OMTS95-041 Consideration of motion to approve, in concept, the
construction of a Compressed Natural Gas Refueling Station, Job
No. P1-51; authorizing staff to loan reserve funds in the 1995-96
budget to build the station; and directing staff to establish an
enterprise report for future review.
(5) FAHR95-25 Consideration of Resolution No. 95-105, repealing
Resolution No. 95-54 Pertaining to Classification, Compensation,
and Other Terms, Conditions, Rules and Regulations of
Employment, reflecting changes occurring in legislation and labor
law, and required insurance coverages.
(6) FAHR95-38 Consideration of motion authorizing staff to solicit bids
for a professional services agreement for the Financial Information
System project for completion of Phase III, Selection Process for
Hardware and Software; and Phase IV, Implementation and
Acceptance of the Selected Hardware and Software Solutions.
(7) FAHR95-40 Consideration of motion authorizing staff to negotiate
Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement between County Sanitation
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 & 13 and County Sanitation District
No. 14 for Purchase and Sale of Capacity Rights in Treatment,
Disposal and Sewer Facilities, providing for District No. 14's annual
flow to be based upon actual average flow per day for the four
highest months, and providing capacity for higher winter month
flows.
(8) FAHR95.41 Consideration of motion to receive and file monthly
investment report and staff report regarding performance
monitoring of Pacific Investment Management Company.
-6-
[ITEM (11)(b) CONTINUED ON PAGE 7]
10/25/95
A-
' (11) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 6)
(b) (9) FAHR95-42 Consideration of the following actions re Establishing
Policy for Microcomputer Acquisitions:
(a) Consideration of motion declaring a policy that all PC
technology purchases be limited to the most recent list of
Tier 1 and Tier 2 vendors as defined by The GartnerGroup,
for both desktop computers and mobile computers.
(b) Consideration of motion declaring a policy that all purchasing
actions relating to the purchase of PC technology utilize the
California Multiple Award Schedule (CMAS) contracts for the
purchase of PC technology from among the Tier 1 and Tier 2
vendors as defined by GartnerGroup; and authorizing staff to
compare CMAS pricing to choose the lowest priced Tier 1
and Tier 2 vendor's configuration applicable to the Districts'
needs.
(c) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a purchase
order to Dell Computer for the Purchase of 60 Personal
Computers and Monitors and Other Associated Components
(Specification No. E-261)for a total amount not to exceed
$208,900.00, plus sales tax.
(10) FAHR95-43 Consideration of Resolution No. 95-106, authorizing
the establishment of a Relief Operator bonus of$0.60 per hour for
employees covered by the Operations and Maintenance
Memorandum of Understanding.
(12) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion, as requested by Director John Gullixson, that the
Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee study, review and
make recommendations regarding the implementation of time clocks for Districts'
staff.
(13) ALL DISTRICTS
Verbal report on status of the Strategic Plan -Assistant General Manager,
Operations and Assistant General Manager, Administration.
-7-
10/25/95 i
(14) ALL DISTRICTS
Update re proposed acquisition of County Solid Waste Management System, and
consideration of the following actions:
(a) Consideration of motion authorizing staff and consultants to conduct
expanded Phase I Assessment Studies on moderate and high exposure
landfill sites, to be done within the previously authorized amount of
$100,000.00.
(b) Consideration of motion authorizing consulting services for Phase II
Assessment Study to determine landfill assets and liabilities for an amount
not to exceed $100,000.00.
(c) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a letter of interest to enter
into negotiations for the purchase of the County of Orange Solid Waste
Management System; and, authorizing an amount not to exceed
$100,000.00 in nonrefundable option payments to be applied toward the
purchase price.
(15) ALL DISTRICTS
Update concerning developments related to the County's Commingled
Investment Pool.
(16) ALL DISTRICTS
I CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on ..
I this agenda as a regular meeting of the Boards,the Chair may convene the
i Boards in closed session to consider matters of pending or potential ligation,or
personnel matters,pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9,54957 or
54957.6. a'
of l
Reports relating to(a)purchase and sale of real property;(b)matters of A.
i pending or potential litigation;(c)employment actions or negotiations with
employee representatives;or which are exempt from public disclosure under lri,.�
i the California Public Records Act,may be reviewed by the Boards during a M.,I,I
permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such... I
time as final actions are taken by the Boards on any of these subjects the
minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information.
lit IFF
i l • I
(a) Convene in closed session, if necessary
-8-
[ITEM (16) CONTINUED ON PAGE 9]
10/25/95
(16) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 8)
(b) (1) Confer with General Counsel re status of litigation, Louis
Sangennano v. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County.
(2) Confer with General Counsel re status of litigation, County
Sanitation District No. 3 v. United Technologies Corp., Orange
County Superior Court Case No. 722816.
(3) Confer with General Counsel re status of litigation, S. Serrantino v.
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Orange County
Superior Court Case No. 737044.
(4) Confer with Special Counsel re status of litigation, Lloyd T. Nitzen v.
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Superior Court Case
No. 712847.
(c) Reconvene in regular session
(d) Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session
(17) ALL DISTRICTS
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(18) ALL DISTRICTS
Matters which a Director would like staff to report on at a subsequent meeting
(19) ALL DISTRICTS
Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and
staff report
(20) DISTRICT 1
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(21) OISTRICTI
Consideration of motion to adjourn
-9-
10/25/95
(22) DISTRICT2
Consideration of the following actions relative to Rehabilitation of Cypress
Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-R1:
(a) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3 to the plans and
specifications for said project, authorizing an addition of$7,398.80 to the
contract with Colich Bros., Inc. dba Colich & Sons, for one item of
additional work, and granting a time extension of 30 calendar days for
completion of said additional work.
(b) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 4 to the plans and
specifications for said project, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's
quantities for a net deduction of$109,637.60 from the contract with Colich
Bros., Inc. dba Colich & Sons.
(c) Consideration of Resolution No. 95-107-2, accepting said contract, as
complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving
Final Closeout Agreement for a final total contract amount of$2,657,809.81
(original awarded contract amount of$2,482,762.00).
(23) DISTRICT2
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(24) DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(25) DISTRICT 3
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(26) DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(27) DISTRICT 5
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(28) DISTRICT 5
Consideration of motion to adjourn
-10-
9 10/25/95
(29) DISTRICTS 6. 7 8 14
Consideration of the following actions relative to Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from
Fairview Road to Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-1A:
(a) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3 to the plans and
specifications for said project, authorizing an addition of$39,734.90 to the
contract with Mladen Buntich Construction Co., Inc., for five items of
additional work, and granting a time extension of 33 calendar days for
completion of said additional work.
(b) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 4 to the plans and
specifications for said project, authorizing an addition of$209,090.78 to the
contract with Mladen Buntich Construction Co., Inc., for nine items of
additional work, and granting a time extension of 39 calendar days for
completion of said additional work.
(c) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 5 to the plans and
specifications for said project, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's
quantities for a net addition of$36,059.00 to the contract with Mladen
Buntich Construction Co., Inc.
(d) Consideration of Resolution No. 95-108, accepting said contract as
complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving
Final Closeout Agreement for a final total contract amount of$8,810,715.81
(original awarded contract amount of$8,278,963.00).
(30) DISTRICT 6
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(31) DISTRICT
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(32) DISTRICT 7
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(33) DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(34) DISTRICT 11
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(35) DISTRICT 11
Consideration of motion to adjourn
_11_
10/25/95
1
(36) DISTRICT 13
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(37) DISTRICT 13
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(38) DISTRICT 14
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(39) DISTRICT 14
Consideration of motion to adjourn
,z
i§ - ; vplaceitems on thegend-aor-Ihaf3egula111u ea ulg> ant'
arclsDtredors shalCubmCt iCemso�e Board SeaeYary not lateiharfhaxlos
bus7ness fi4 days pre caEing the Jana Board meeti997..a Board 8ecretarys�all Include an
tYie agentla ll`items'sutimitted bj/'D'rectors,ttie Genei`al Ma-ager_ntl .,onerat nunsel GMS
-�Irmatwmmuniat6cos y � t
� k
� board$eeretary i 'Penny Kyle.':. (714,982 24�1 R max( 3202$ ` '
Bebrelaly � Patnae k �(71i`-2'241��ex1.202g
Rw
_12_
JAwaooMeswc AOCT951A.1a
COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 , 13 AND 14
OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
MINUTES
JOINT BOARD MEETING
SEPTEMBER 27, 1995
�\oa0\gZRfCTS OF�9gG
� c
Z 1
7
v a
ww
A9oTFCl�N�iHE
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018
ROIL CALL
`a A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County SanRetion Districts Nos. 1, 2. 3. 5, 6.
7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on September 27, 1995, at 7:30 p.m.,in
the Districts'Administra6vs Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the soli Was
Called and the Sacroviry reported a quorum present for Disvictt Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14
as follows:
ACTNE ALTERNATE
DIRECTORS DIRECTORS
DISTRICT NO. 1: Pat McGuigan, Clair Ted R.Moreno
_ James M. Ferryman,Clair pro tam 1 Arland Schater
y Mark A.MupM Jeanne Coons
Thomas R.Seashell Jim Pons
Roger Suntan William G.Share,
DISTRICT NO.2: �_ JOM Collins.Chair George Scon
Daniel T.Welch.Chair are tam John M.Gellman
1 Bash Dares Bob Bell
x Berme DuNap Glenn Parker
Norman 2.Eckemodc Carol DPanoy
James H.Flom Stave Anderson
per McGuigan Ted R.Moreno
Mark A.Murphy Jearme Coomz
y Julie So Chas NPrby
x Sheldon Singer George L.Zlaket
I Roger Shamon William G.Swim,
_L Bob Z.6 Tom Daly
DISTRICT NO.3: x Sal A.Samen. Clair Harry M.Dorton
Burnie Demap. Chair pro tam Glenn Parker
1 Cecilia Age Walter Bowman
* George Brown Merlyn Bruce Hearings
J_ John Collins George Seen
i James H.Flora Steve Anderson
x Don R.Griffin Pots,Marshall
i Victor Lempng Ralph Bauer
i Wally Unn Eva G.Minor
Pat McGuigan Ted R.Moreno
X Margie L.Rice Grace Epperson
_L Jet.Sa Chris North,
X Sheldon Singer George L.Zlaket
1 Roger Stanton W llum G.Steiner
Charles GyHid Ruben Wahlslrom
Bob Zemel Tom Daly
DISTRICT 140.5: Jan Gebay.Chair x John C.Cox,Jr.
X William G.Steiner, Chair pro ttm _ Roger Stanton
John C.Cox,Jr. _ Jan Debav
DISTRICT NO.6: James M. Ferryman.Clair I Arlene Schafer
Jan Dewy,Chair pro tam John C.Cox,Jr.
g William G.Samir ROBer Sumon
DISTRICT NO. 7: Barry Hammond,Chair Mike Ward
Thomas R. Sanarch.Chair pro tam Jim Pons
Jan Dehay Jahn C.Cox,Jr.
James W Ferryman _ Arlene Staler
y Pat McGuigan _ Ted R.Moreno
Mark A. Murphy _ Joanne Coosa
William G.Blame, _ Roger Samoan
DISTRICT NO. 11: i Victor Leipzig,Chair _ Ralph Bauer
X Shirley DeviloN.Chair pro rem _ Ralph Bauer
Roger Stamen _ Wiliam G.Steiner
DISTRICT NO. 13: 3 John M. GPllmson, Chair _ Ddreel T.Welch
x, Bob Zombi.Chair pro tam _ Tom Daly
X Me*A. Murphy _ Joanne Coosa
_ Glenn Parker Burnie Gambia
g William G.Stempr _ Roger Stamm
DISTRICT NO. 14: Thomas R.Salarelli,Chair _ Jim Potts
X Mark A. MumM. Clair Pro hem _ items Cmnn
Bally Ramrnand _ Mike Ward
a William G.Sterner _ paper Stamen
y Peer A.Swan _ Darryl Who,
-2-
09f27195 �
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Don McIntyre, General Manager, Blake P. Anderson,
Assistant General Manager-Operations, Judith A.
Wilson, Assistant General Manager-Administration,
Penny Kyle, Board Secretary, Laurie Bluestein, Gary
Hasenstab, Ed Hodges, Steve Hovey, Patricia Jonk,
John Linder, David Ludwin, Charles McGee, Pat
McNelly, Mike Moore, Bob Ooten, Stuart Severn,
Gary Streed, Nancy Wheatley, Paula Zeller
OTHERS PRESENT: Terry Andrus, Assistant General Counsel, Bill Knopf,
George Zlaket, Alternate Director
DISTRICT 6
Appointment of Chair pro tem
In the absence of Chair James M. Ferryman and Chair pro tem Jan Debay,
Director William G. Steiner was appointed Chair pro tem of District No. 6.
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the Joint Chair
The Joint Chair reported on the success of Family Day held on September 23,
1995, and advised that over 500 staff and family members attended the event.
The following tentatively scheduled upcoming meetings were then announced,
as follows:
Operations, Maintenance, and Technical Services Committee -
Wednesday, October 4, at 5:30 p.m.
Planning, Design, and Construction Committee -Thursday, October 5, at
5:30 p.m.
Finance, Administrative, and Human Resources Committee -
Wednesday, October 11, at 5:30 p.m.
Executive Committee - Wednesday, October 18, at 5:30 p.m.
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the General Manager
The General Manager advised the Directors that parking passes were included
in their meeting folders, and that it would be necessary to display the pass upon
entering the plant premises.
-3-
09/27/95
• Nancy Wheatley then introduced Charles McGee, who discussed the Districts'
recent findings that some of our beach monitoring results indicate higher than
normal bacterial counts. He explained the Districts increased beach and
near-shore monitoring in response to those results, and the retaining of Camp
Dresser & McKee, Inc. to assist in assessment of possible on-shore sources of
contamination. While we have concluded that the source of the elevated
counts is not our outfall, we have been unsuccessful in determining the actual
cause. We have elected to continue efforts locate the source(s) of the
contamination even though the responsibility is not ours because the County is
not in a financial position to carry on the work itself.
Ms. Wheatley advised that prudent actions would be taken to ascertain the
on-shore source(s) of the contamination.
DISTRICT 1
Approval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the special
meeting held August 21, 1995, and the regular meeting held August 23, 1995.
the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT2
Approval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the special
meeting held August 21, 1995, and the regular meeting held August 23, 1995,
the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 3
Approval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the special
meeting held August 21, 1995, and the regular meeting held August 23, 1995,
the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 5
Approval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the special
meeting held August 21, 1995, and the regular meeting held August 23, 1995,
the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 6
Approval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the special
meeting held August 21, 1995, and the regular meeting held August 23, 1995,
the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
-4-
r
i
09/27/95
DISTRICT 7
Approval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the special
meeting held August 21, 1995, and the regular meeting held August 23, 1995,
the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 11
Approval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the special
meeting held August 21, 1995, and the regular meeting held August 23, 1995,
the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 13
Approval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the special
meeting held August 21, 1995, and the regular meeting held August 23, 1995,
the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 14
Approval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular
meeting held August 23, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed
approved, as mailed.
ALL DISTRICTS
Ratification of payment of Joint and
Individual District Claims
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That payment of Joint and Individual District claims set forth on exhibits "A" and
"B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below,
be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so
indicated.
-5-
09/27/95
08/23/95 09/06/95
ALL DISTRICTS
Joint Operating Fund - $676,963.47 $599,246.29
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 251.686.38 369,191.55
Joint Working Capital Fund - 197,965.10 241,683.58
Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 29,163.56 31,663.69
DISTRICT NO. 1 - 0.00 9,562.93
DISTRICT NO. 2 - 2,793.58 215,175.79
DISTRICT NO. 3 - 14,518.22 392.564.10
DISTRICT NO. 5 - 406.41 9,853.31
DISTRICT NO. 6 - 100.00 5,267.86
DISTRICT NO. 7 - 39,811.67 19,139.95
DISTRICT NO. 11 - 115,685.29 7,968.33
DISTRICT NO. 13 - 105.60 1,266.10
DISTRICT NO, 14 - 2,812.76 4,494.51
DISTRICTS NOS. 5 &6 JOINT - 574.20 3,503.90
DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 1,371.62 2,563.16
DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 3 83 . 76.40 5,815.95
$1367,83426 $1,918,961.00
ALL DISTRICTS
Awarding Purchase of Ferric Chloride,
Specification No. C-039. to Kemiron Pacific, Inc.
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 95-99, receiving and
filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Purchase of
Ferric Chloride, Specification No. 0-039, to Kemiron Pacific, Inc., for the
delivered price of$257.50 per dry ton, including sales tax and shipping, for a
seven-month period, and $228.00 per dry ton, including sales tax and shipping,
for a one-year period beginning December 1, 1995, with provision for four
one-year extensions. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a
part of these minutes.
-6-
09/27/95 '
s
ALL DISTRICTS
Authorizina staff to issue a purchase order contrail
to Digital Eauipment Corporation for Computer
Hardware and Software Maintenance Services.
(Specification No. M-044)
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue a purchase order contract to
Digital Equipment Corporation for Computer Hardware and Software
Maintenance Services (Specification No. M-055), for a one-year period
beginning October 1, 1995, in an amount not to exceed $84,168.52, plus sales
tax.
Director Mark A. Murphy requested that his opposition to the motion be made
a matter of record.
ALL DISTRICTS
Awarding Purchase of Twenty-Five Sets
of Filter Media Belts, Specification No S-074
to Gierlich-Mitchell. Inc.
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the bid tabulation and recommendation for award of purchase order
contract for Purchase of Twenty-Five Sets of Filter Media Belts, Specification
No. S-074, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase order contract be, and is hereby,
awarded to Gierlich-Mitchell, Inc., for a total amount not to exceed $91.125.00,
plus sales tax.
-7-
09/27/95
ALL DISTRICTS
Authorizina the General Manager to approve participation
of Districts' Senior Environmental Specialist in the annual
meeting of the Society of Environmental Toxicologv and
Chemistry (SETAC) and the American Society for Testina
and Materials (ASTM). November 4-9. 1995. in Vancouver.
British Columbia. Canada
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to approve
participation of Tom Gerlinger, Districts' Senior Environmental Specialist, in the
annual meeting of the Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
(SETAC) and the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM),
November 4, 1995 through November 9, 1995, in Vancouver, British Columbia,
Canada; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That reimbursement for transportation, lodging, meals,
and incidental expenses be, and is hereby, authorized in accordance with
Districts' established expense reimbursement policies.
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive and file draft minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee
re Space Utilization Study
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the draft minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization Study
meetings held on July 19, July 25, August 2, and September 7, 1995, be, and
are hereby, received and ordered filed.
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive and file draft minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee
re Landfill Acquisition
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the draft minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re Landfill Acquisition meetings
held on August 9 and 16, 1995, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed.
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive and file draft minutes of the Steerina Committee
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the draft minutes of the Steering Committee meeting held on August 23,
1995, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed.
-8-
09/27/95
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive and file draft minutes of the Operations.
Maintenance and Technical Services Committee
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the draft minutes of the Operations, Maintenance, and Technical Services
Committee meeting held on September 6, 1995, be, and are hereby, received
and ordered filed.
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive and file draft minutes of the Planning.
Design. and Construction Committee
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the draft minutes of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee
meeting held on September 7, 1995, be, and are hereby, received and ordered
filed.
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive and file draft minutes of the Finance. Administration.
and Human Resources Committee
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the draft minutes of the Finance, Administration, and Human Resources
Committee meeting held on September 13, 1995, be, and are hereby, received
and ordered filed.
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive and file draft minutes of the Executive Committee
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the draft minutes of the Executive Committee meeting held on
September 20, 1995, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed.
-9-
09/27/95
ALL DISTRICTS
Authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to GTE
for the Purchase of Meridian 1 Upgrade for PBX at
Plant No. 1 and Purchase of Meridian 1 PBX at
Plant No. 2 (Specification No. E-258)
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue a purchase order to GTE, in a
total amount not to exceed $87,337.81, plus sales tax, for the Purchase of
Meridian 1 Option 61 Upgrade for PBX at Plant No. 1, and Purchase of
Meridian 1 Option 11 E PBX for Plant No. 2 (Specification No. E-258).
ALL DISTRICTS
Authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to GTE
for Telephone Systems Maintenance Agreement
(Soecification No. P-163)
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue a purchase order to GTE for a
Telephone Systems Maintenance Agreement for the Districts' telephone PBX
and related equipment (Specification No. P-163), for a three-year period
beginning October 1, 1995 to September 30, 1998, for an amount not to exceed
$74,113.80 for existing equipment.
ALL DISTRICTS (OMTS95-039)
AAporovino plans and specifications re Job No. J-31-2
Moved, seconded, and duly carried,
That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 95-100, approving
plans and specifications for Ocean Outfall Booster Station Control System
Upgrade at Plants Nos. 1 &2, Job No. J-31-2, and authorizing the General
Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. Said resolution, by reference
hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
-10-
}
09/27/95
ALL DISTRICTS (OMTS95-042)
Authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to
Waters Corporation for Purchase of a High
Pressure Liquid Chromatography System
(Specification No. E-260)
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue a purchase order to Waters
Corporation for the Purchase of a Discovery System 616, Millennium 2010
Pentium SS High Pressure Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) System
(Specification No. E-260), for a total amount not to exceed $74,210.00, plus
sales tax and shipping.
ALL DISTRICTS (PDC95-28)
Approving Specific Term Employment Agreement with
Joseph T. Horvath
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 95-101, approving
Specific Term Employment Agreement with Joseph T. Horvath for specialized
construction management and inspection services for various master-planned
construction projects, on an as-needed basis at the hourly rate of$35.00 for a
two-year period beginning October 11, 1995, with option for a one year
extension. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these
minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS
Approving interest rate for deferred excess
capacity charge agreements
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the interest rate for deferred excess capacity charge agreements equal to
the rate charged on the date of the agreement on U.S. Treasury Bills or Notes
with a term most close to the term of agreement plus 100 basis points be, and
is hereby, approved.
Directors Margie L. Rice and Roger R. Stanton requested that their opposition
to the motion be made a matter of record.
-11-
09/27/95
ALL DISTRICTS
Approving agreement for Real Property Lease
at Plant No. 1. Specification No. L-009-1 with
First Federal Bank of California
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 95-102, approving
agreement for Real Property Lease at Plant No. 1, Specification No. L-009-1,
With First Federal Bank of California, for a three-year period beginning
September 1, 1995, for a minimum amount of$60,000 per year or 10% of the
annual gross revenue rentals, whichever is greater. Said resolution, by
reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS
Status_report re County's Commingled Investment Pool
Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager of Operations, gave a brief report
on the status of the Orange County Commingled Investment Pool and the
County of Orange bankruptcy.
ALL DISTRICTS
General Counsel's comments Prior to Closed Session
General Counsel reported to the Directors the need for a closed session as
authorized by Government Code Section 54956.9(a) to discuss and consider
the items that are specified as Items 14(b)(1), (2), and (3) on the published
Agenda. No other items would be discussed or acted upon.
ALL DISTRICTS
Convene in Closed Session pursuant to
Government Code Section 54956.9fa1
The Boards convened in closed session at 8:17 p.m. pursuant to Government
Code Section 54956.9(a). Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by
the Boards of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California
Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary
in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed
Meetings.
ALL DISTRICTS
Reconvene in regular session
At 8:52 p.m., the Boards reconvened in regular session.
-12-
i
09/27/95
ALL DISTRICTS
Serranlino v. County Sanitation Districts, OCSC Case No. 737044
General Counsel reported that during closed session, the Boards of Directors
had voted unanimously to file an appeal of the Superior Court action granting
Plaintiffs motion for peremptory writ of mandate.
DISTRICT NO. 3
County Sanitation District No. 3 Y. United
Technologies Corporation. at al.. OCSC Case No. 722816
General Counsel reported that during closed session, the Boards of Directors
acted to oppose Defendant United Technologies Corporation's appeal and file a
cross-appeal.
ALL DISTRICTS
Matters for future agenda action and staff report
Director John M. Gullixson requested that the the time clock issue be
agendized for the Joint Board meeting to be held on October 25, 1995, for
referral to the Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee for
review.
DISTRICT 1
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1
be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:55 p.m.
DISTRICT 2
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2
be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:55 p.m.
DISTRICT 3
Adioumment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3
be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:55 p.m.
-13-
09/27/95
DISTRICTS 5 & 6
Receive and file Selection Committee minutes
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the minutes of the Districts Nos. 5 and 6 Selection Committee held
September 8, 1995, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed.
DISTRICTS 5 & 6
Approving Addendum No. 1 to the Professional
Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering
Corporation for design of Contract Nos. 5-37-3
and 5-37-4
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee relative to
Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle
Engineering Corporation for design and construction services required for
Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3, Contract
No. 5-37-3, and Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase
4, Contract No. 5-37-4, providing for additional design and construction
support services, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution
No. 95-103, approving Addendum No. 1 to said agreement with Boyle
Engineering Corporation for said additional services, on an hourly-rate basis
for labor plus overhead, direct expenses, subconsultant fees, and fixed profit,
for an additional amount not to exceed $48,186.00, increasing the total
authorized compensation from $165.100.00 to an amount not to exceed
$213,286.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of
these minutes.
DISTRICT 5
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5
be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:55 p.m.
-14-
09/27/95
DISTRICTS 6 7 & 14
Approving Change Order No. 2 to the Plans and specifications
for Contract No. 14-1-1A
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Baker-Gisler
Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-1A,
authorizing an addition of$213,171.91 to the contract with Mladen Buntich
Construction Co., Inc., for 13 items of additional work, and granting a time
extension of 73 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and
is hereby, approved.
DISTRICT 6
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6
be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:55 p.m.
DISTRICT 7
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7
be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:55 p.m.
DISTRICT 11
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11
be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:55 p.m.
DISTRICT 13
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13
be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:55 p.m.
-15-
09/27/95
DISTRICT 14
A journment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14
be adjourned. The Chair then declared the
l�mmeeeeetiing�so adjourned at 8:55 p.m.
/a4o �k
0
Secretary c t B r Is of Directors
of County nitati n istricts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 1, 13 and 14
-16-
FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 011795 PAGE 1 '
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SAWTATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 0&12395 POSTING DATE 0=395
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
146500 AEE ENERGY SEMINARS $595.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION-TECHNICAL
1465DI AG TECH COMPANY $52.397.80 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10.9-01
146502 AT&T-SMALL BUS.ADVANTAGE $696.50 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
146503 ADAMSON INDUSTRIES $383.54 LAB SUPPLIES
146504 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $18,037.20 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.O.8-949
146505 AIR&WASTE MGMT.ASSOC. $490.00 WORKSHOP REGISTRATION
1465D8 ALTA-ROBBINS $262.40 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
146507 AAES $174.00 PUBLICATION
146508 AMERICAN COMPUTER&COMM. $149.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
146509 AMERICAN PROTECTIVE SER.INC. $734.40 SECURITY SERVICES
145510 AMERICAN SIGMA $23,048.45 METER PARTS
146511 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION $8.895.50 EMERGENCY SEWER REPAIRS
146512 ANALYSTS,INC. $749.76 OIL ANALYSIS
146513 SLAKE P.ANDERSON $108.73 REIMBURSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE
146514 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $1,779.30 NOTICES&ADS
146515 ARROWHEAD ELECTRIC CO. $163.81 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
TT1 146516 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE,INC. $6.095.20 WASTE REMOVAL
X 146517 ATKIWJONES COMPUTER SERVICE $321.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT
14651& AUTO SHOP EQUIPMENT CO. $461.63 TRUCK PARTS
L10 146519 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $3,926.33 PAYROLL SERVICES
.� 146520 BKK LANDFILL $3.889.75 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10.9-91
146521 BRIM SAFETY&SUPPLY $550.82 SAFETY SUPPLIES
D 146522 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $4,512.39 BATTERIES
t� 146523 BAUER COMPRESSOR $476.79 COMPRESSOR PARTS
145524 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS.INC. $5.618.67 LAB SUPPLIES
146525 B10-GRO DIVISION $40,397A1 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.4-26-95
146528 BIOMERIEUXVITEK,INC. $274.44 LAB SUPPLIES
W527 BONA-RUES $713.53 TRUCK PARTS
W528 BORNEMANN PUMPS,INC. $5,498.84 PUMP PARTS
146529 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $28.502.98 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-14
146M BRONSON,BRONSON&MCKINNON $14,859.32 LEGAL SERVICES-COUNTY BANKRUPTCY
146531 BUDGET JANITORIAL $3,330.00 JANITORIAL SERVICES
146532 CEBSPROGRAM $269.60 CERTIFICATION REGISTRATION
W633 CH2M HILL $150,923.85 ENGINEERING SERVICES J31
146634 C.P.I. $804.35 LAB SUPPLIES
146535 CS COMPANY $1,245.89 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
146536 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH,INC. $59.26 LAB REPAIRS
146537 CALIFORNIA AUTO COLLISION,INC. $315.60 TRUCKPARTS
146538 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $115.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
146539 CANUS CORPORATION $3,044.58 FIBER OPTIC CABLE
148540 CARLETON ENGINEERS $2,800.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES-AIR QUALITY
146541 MDT/CASTLE $449.18 LABSUPPLIES
146542 CENTURY SAFETY INST.&SUPPLY $1,057.89 SAFETY SUPPLIES
146543 CHASE,ROTCHFORD.DRUKKER $4.273.21 LEGAL SERVICES-PLT 2 ACCIDENT
140" CHEMWEST,INC. $41.693.47 PUMP PARTS
146545 COUCH&SONS $58.121.70 CONSTRUCTION I1-17-1
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE W17M5 PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 0523I95 POSTING DATE 0823AA
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
146545 COMPUSERVE $266.56 COMPUTER SERVICES
146547 CONSOLIDATED REPOGRAPHICS $79.09 ENGINEERING SUPPLIES
146648 CONSUMER PIPE $1,111.72 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
146549 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC. $557.26 TOOLS
146550 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS O C $455.62 CONSULTING SERVICES M.O.S-11.93
146551 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $15,102.92 FITTINGS
146552 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $322.14 TRUCK PARTS
146553 R E COULTER CRANE RENTAL $552.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
146554 COUNTERPART ENTERPRISES $2,062.98 COMPRESSOR PARTS
146555 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 8645.85 ELECTRIC PARTS
14655E CWWLES P.CROWLEY.CO. $568.45 PUMPS
146557 CURTIN MATHESON SCIENTIFIC $2.482.50 LAB SUPPLIES
146558 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $100.00 REPORTFEE
146559 HSKIDECKER $067.16 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
146560 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIF. $22,365.36 DENTAL INSURANCE PLAN M.O.1-12-94
146561 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $786.48 PAINT SUPPLIES
m 146562 OVALS SALES $280.32 FITTINGS
X 146563 EASTMAN,INC. $4.902.69 OFFICE SUPPLIES
s 146564 EBERHARD EQUIPMENT $416.26 TRUCK PARTS
146565 EDWARDS DIV.OF GS BLDG SYS. $3,131.77 SAFETY SUPPLIEWSERVICE AGREEMENT
146566 ELECTRO TEST,INC. $2,944.00 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
146567 ELECTRICAL INSULATION $92.21 INSTRUMENTATION SUPPLIES
y 146568 EMPIRE SCALE CO. $433.30 PRINTER
146569 ENCAD $70.04 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
N 146570 ENCHANTER,INC. $3,500.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5.24-95
148571 FMC CORP. $60,446.99 HYDROGEN PEROXIDE M.O.9-14-94
145572 FASTFRAME OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $395.68 AWARDS FRAMING
146573 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $57.25 AIR FREIGHT
140574 FILTERLINE CORP. $55.09 FILTERS
146575 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $471.78 LAB SUPPLIES
146576 FISIONS INSTRUMENTS $11,527.35 SERVICE AGREEMENT
146577 FLOSYSTEMS.INC. $38,771.07 PUMP PARTS
146578 FLUID METERING,INC. $658.50 LAB SUPPLIES
146579 FOSSMARITIMECO. $1,600.00 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
146580 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $26.25 PHOTOSUPPLIES
146581 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $17,708.40 WATER USE
146582 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $628,97 PAINT SUPPLIES
140553 THE FOXBORO CO. $1.706.40 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
146584 FRAZEE PAINT$WALCOVERING $472.76 PAINT SUPPLIES
146585 FREEDOM IMAGING $76.65 SERVICE AGREEMENT
146588 FRYS ELECTRONICS -$52024 ELECTRIC GEAR
146587 GET,INC. $4,421.08 OFFICE SUPPLIES
146568 TED&GAEBLER $51000.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING FEE
146559 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $40.72 LUMBERIHARDWARE
146590 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $1,682.63 ELECTRIC PARTS
146591 GENERA.TELEPHONE CO. $7,752.16 TELEPHONE SERVICES
FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8117195 PAGES
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID OBI23/95 POSTING DATE 0812Y95
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
146592 UFE TECHNOLOGIESIGIBCO/BRL $58.62 LAB SUPPLIES
146593 GIERLICH41TCHELL,INC. $2.952.20 PUMP PARTS
146594 GOLDEN COAST SAWDUST PROD. $1.616.25 SAWDUST
146595 WAN GRAINGER,INC. $138.53 ELECTRIC PARTS
146596 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $2,149.91 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
146597 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $5.752.03 PRINTING
- 146595 DGACONSULTANTS $3,560.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-8-94
146599 HB TYPE&GRAPHICS $187.49 PRINTING
146600 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $7,3D7.15 TRUCK PARTS
146601 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $511.72 HARDWARE
146602 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS $1,830.00 CONTAINER RENTALS
146603 HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT $2.083.33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN.
146604 HEWLETT PACKARD CO. $1,008.56 VALVES
146605 HOLMES&NARVER,INC. $2.362.10 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-44
146608 HOME DEPOT $395.01 HARDWARE
146607 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $265.77 PAINTSUPPUES
146608 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $2.359.00 PERMIT FEE
X 146609 IPCO SAFETY $3.185.49 SAFETY SUPPLIES
s 146610 IRD MECHANALYSIS $2.853.21 MECHANICAL ANALYSIS
by 146611 [BCD,INC. $213.07 INSTRUMENT PARTS
146612 IMAGING PLUS,INC. $928.20 LAB SUPPLIES
146613 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $48,950.85 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11.18.92
y 146614 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $504.79 CONNECTORS
146615 INGERSOLL-RAND EQUIP CORP. $143.64 TRUCK PARTS
W 146618 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE $348.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
146617 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $1,136.67 BATTERIES
146618 J2 PRINTING SERVICES $371.79 PRINTING
146619 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY. $1,298.57 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
146620 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $53.21 ELECTRIC PARTS
146621 JONES CHEMICALS.INC. $5,299.07 CHEMICALS
146622 KMI INDUSTRIES $114.66 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
M623 KELLEY BLUE BOOK $136.00 SUBSCRIPTION
146624 KEYE PRODUCTIVITY CENTER $1,945.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING REGISTRATION
146625 KING BEARING,INC. $1.209.88 MACHINE SUPPLIES
146626 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $4,083.N TOOLS
146627 L A CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $1.059.01 CELLULAR TELEPHONE CHARGES
146628 LAIDLAW ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES $706.40 WASTE DISPOSAL
146629 LEYSOLD VACUUM PRODUCTS $192.52 LAB SUPPLIES
146630 MDT BIOLOGIC COMPANY $477.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
146631 MPS $184.45 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
146632 MAGNETEK $1.160.50 ELECTRIC PARTS
146633 MARKON COMPUTER SCIENCE $1,479.56 INSTRUMENT PARTS
146634 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $BW.82 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
146635 MCKENNA ENGR.&EQUIP. $275.55 PUMP PARTS
146636 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3,897.25 UNIFORM RENTALS
146637 NATIONAL ENVIRO.INFO.SERV. $11&50 LAB SUPPLIES
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE W17M5 PAGE 4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 0823195 POSTING DATE 0823195
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
146638 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES.INC. $4,515.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES
146639 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $350.00 MEMBERSHIP FEES
146640 NEUTRON $1,751.89 ANIONIC POLYMER M.0.8-10-94
146641 NEWARK ELECTRONICS $193.23 LAB SUPPLIES
146642 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $432.35 SAFETY GLASSES
146643 OPERATION TECHNOLOGY,INC. $1.578.54 SERVICE AGREEMENT
146644 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO. $1.065.37 CHEMICALS
146645 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $1.411.60 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
146646 ORANGE COURIER $442.85 COURIER SERVICES
146647 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. $3.949.39 FITTINGS
146648 OXYGEN SERVICE $2,694A3 SPECIALTY GASES
146649 COUNTY OF ORANGE $273.00 PERMIT FEES
146650 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT $60.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION
146651 PSSI $1,603.80 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION
146652 PACIFIC CLIPPINGS $124.90 NEWSPAPER CLIPPING SERVICE
146653 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $1.584.49 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
X 146654 PACIFIC PARTS $7,648.09 INSTRUMENT PARTS
= 146655 PACIFIC BELL $1.387.57 TELEPHONE SERVICES
146656 PAGENET $3.902.53 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
146657 PARAMOUNT TANK,INC. $668.71 TANK INSPECTION SERVICES
146658 PARTS UNLIMITED $431.20 TRUCK PARTS
146659 PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION $4,878.25 SERVICE AGREEMENT
D 146660 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $3,909.67 REIMB.PETTY CASH,TRAINING&TRAVEL
r 146661 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $105,964.20 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3-29-95
146662 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS $42.125.34 COMPUTER HARDWARE-M.0.5-24-95
146663 POHLSON,MOORHEAD&GOETHALS 11313.50 CAL-0SHA INVESTIGATION
146664 POLYMETRICS,INC. $2,525.50 LAB SUPPLIES
146665 POLYPURE,INC. $9,178.42 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3.11-92
146666 POST CONSUMER PRODUCTS $5,182.22 AWARDS
146667 POWER MACHINE CO. $370.33 MECHANICAL PARTS
146668 POWER SYSTEMS TESTING CO. $1.249.99 ELECTRIC PARTS
146669 PRECISION GLASS BLOWING $506.03 LAB SUPPLIES
146670 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $160.00 ICE
146671 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE IND. $2,091.00. SOIL TESTING
146672 PROMINENT FLUID CONTROL.INC. 5410AD VALVES
146673 R&R INSTRUMENTS $1,081.02 INSTRUMENT PARTS
148674 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $2,062.75 TRASH REMOVAL
146675 RANIN INSTRUMENT CO. $806.30 LAB SUPPLIES
146676 REDWINGSHOES $102.58 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES
146677 THE REGISTER $211.20 NOTICES&ADS
146678 REISH MARINE STUDIES,INC. $560.00 OCEAN MONITORING
146679 RELIANCE ELECTRIC $1,277.48 ELECTRIC PARTS
146680 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $3,391.98 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
146681 RM MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL $69.67 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
146682 SAS INSTITUTE,INC. $1,266.07 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
146683 SPSS.INC. $314.00 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 811795 PAGES '
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 0823195 POSTING DATE 082395
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
146684 SAN DIEGO SAFETY COUNCIL $243.64 PUBLICATION
146685 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $120.71 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
146686 SCHWINGAMERICA $1.879.42 VALVE PARTS
146667 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $708.72 SPECIALTY GASES
146688 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $9.930.76 TOOLS
146689 SHURELUCK SALES $3.035.88 TOOLSOIARDWARE
146690 SIEVERS INSTRUMENTS,INC. $305.05 LAB SUPPLIES
146691 SKILL PATH,INC. $99.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING REGISTRATION
146692 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $35.80 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS
146693 THE SMITH GROUP $3.544.80 TECHNICAL SERVICES STUDY
146694 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP. $631.87 TOOLS
146895 SO COAST AIR QUALITY $17,345.99 PERMIT FEES
146696 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY $11.606.79 PERMIT FEES
146697 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY $6.60 PERMIT FEES
146698 SOUTH COAST WATER $35.00 LAB SUPPLIES
146699 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. $95.136.28 POWER
M 146700 SO.CAL GAS.CO. $68,078.98 NATURAL GAS
X 146701 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER $2,322.88 DRINKING WATERICOOLER RENTALS
146702 STAMEN Z.SPASSOFF P.E. $12.000.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19.2
00 W03 SUMMIT STEEL $339AI METAL
146704 SUNSET FORD $427.05 TRUCK PARTS
Y 146705 SUPELCO,INC. $127.05 LAB SUPPLIES
1467DS SUPERB ONE-HOUR PHOTO $13.15 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
lfl 148707 TCH ASSOCIATES $491.91 LAB SUPPLIES
146708 TEKTRONIX,INC. $1,392.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
146709 THOMASONSTANLEY,INC. $104.73 FITTINGS
W710 THORPE INSULATION $48.38 INSULATION
146711 TOLEDO SCALE CORP. $300.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS
146712 TONYS LOCK&SAFE SERVICE $4.557.08 LOCKS&KEYS
146713 THETRANECOMPANY $2.803.86 PUMP
146714 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES $3,169.00 TRAVEL SERVICES M.O.6-28-95
146715 TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY,INC. 52,262.00 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.O.S11-94
146710 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $429.97 TRUCK PARTS
146717 TRUCK PARTS SUPPLY $68.38 TRUCK PARTS
146718 TRUESDAIL LABS $588.00 LAB SERVICES
146719 JO TUCKER&SON,INC. $656.85 INSTRUMENT PARTS
149720 TUSTIN DODGE $38.91 TRUCK PARTS
146721 U.S.AUTO GLASS CENTERS $576.47 TRUCK PARTS
M722 UNISOURCEWOR BUTLER PAPER $88.68 OFFICE SUPPLIES
146723 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $88.91 PARCEL SERVICES
146724 DATAVAULTIUS SAFE DEPOSIT CO. $104.00 COMPUTER BACK-UP STORAGE
146725 VWR SCIENTIFIC $1,809.69 LAB SUPPLIES
146726 VALCO INSTRUMENTS CO.,INC. $421.40 LAB SUPPLIES
146727 WESTERN METRO $88.97 MECHANICAL PARTS
148728 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $901.95 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
146729 VANIER BUSINESS FORMS $914.80 OFFICE SUPPLIES
FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8117195 PAGES
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 08123/95 POSTING DATE OB23195
WARRANT NO. VENDOR
146730 VARIABLE SPEED DRIVES 51,982.51 INSTRUMENT PARTS
146731 VARIAN ASSOCIATES,INC. $2,597.04 LAB SUPPLIES
146732 VERTEX TECHNOLOGIES,INC. $975.74 FIBER OPTIC CABLE
146733 VERTEX SYSTEMS $2,354.50 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT
146734 VILLAGE NURSERIES $496.44 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES
146735 VORTEX INDUSTRIES 5235.64 BUILDING REPAIRS
146736 CARL WARREN&CO. $441.66 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR
146737 WARRINGTON $115.00 HARDWARE
146738 WEATHER AND WIND INSTRUMENT $475.03 SAFETY SUPPLIES
146739 WGRA WORKSHOPS $1,500.00 MEMBERSHIP FEE
148740 WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCTS $118.10 SAFETYSUPPLIES
146741 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $36,477.72 CAUSTIC SODA&HYPOCHLORIDE M.0.8-12-92&413-94
146742 WEST4.ITE SUPPLY CO. $459.95 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
146743 WESCO $780.00 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
_ 1467" WHESSOE-VAREC,INC. $1.816.78 MECHANICAL PARTS
146745 XEROX CORP. $13.848.06 COPIER LEASES
M 146746 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $1,292.63 LABSUPPLIES
X 145747 JOHNSON YOKOGAWA CORP. $1,350.19 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
.s. 146748 Z WORLD ENGINEERING $235.65 LAB SUPPUES
lA
1,367,834.28
m SUMMARY AMOUNT
02 OPER FUND $431.48
02 CAP FAC FUND 2,362.10
03 OPER FUND 11,933.22
03 CAP FAC FUND 2,585.00
95 OPER FUND 40SAI
06 CAP FAC FUND 100.00
07 OPER FUND 11,308.69
07 CAP FAC FUND 28,502.98
#11 OPER FUND 57.292.59
011 CAP FAC FUND 58.392.70
913 OPER FUND 105.60
014 OPER FUND 0.00
014 CAP FAC FUND 2,812.76
05&6 OPER FUND 22.20
05&6 CAP FAC FUND 562.00
06167 OPER FUND 1,371.62
07&14 OPER FUND 33.876.40
JT OPER FUND 676,963.47
CORF 251.686.38
SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND 29,163.56
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL 197,965.10
1,367,834.26
PROCESSING DATE 8131/95 PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 09106195 POSTING DATE 09MM5
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
146760 AG TECH COMPANY E56,164.27 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9.91
146761 AM BEST COMPANY $101.95 PUBLICATION
146762 ASL CONSULTING ENGINEERS $1.310.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 2-7A
146763 ATM AA,INC. $2,295.00 LAB SERVICES
146764 AT&T -UNIPLAN SERVICE $2,392.99 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
146765 AT&T-MEGACOM SERVICE $967.80 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
146766 AT&T-PROWATTS $0.91 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
146767 A-Z LOGIC SYSTEMS $126.00 COMPUTER EQUIP.REPAIRS
146768 ACCOUNTANTS OVERLOAD $1,396.50 TEMPORARY PERSONNEL
146769 ADAMS PRECISION INSTRUMENTATION $562.46 MACHINE REPAIRS
146770 ADAMSON INDUSTRIES $1,135.77 LAB SUPPLIES
146771 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $36.074.40 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.O.&9-69
146772 ALFA-LAVAL,INC. $749.82 INSTRUMENT PARTS
146773 AMER SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS $1.786.50 TECHNICAL SEMINAR REGISTRATION
146774 AMERICAN AIRLINES $2,517.00 TRAVEL CHARGES
T1'I 146775 AMERICAN PROTECTIVE SERVICES,INC. $6,436.20 SECURITY SERVICES
X 146776 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION $4,899.18 SEWER REPAIRS
= 1467" ANIXTER-DISTRIBUTION $1,028.66 COMPUTER SUPPLIES
lA 146778 A-PLUS SYSTEMS E3,180.17 NOTICES 8ADS
146779 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $1.372.74 FIBER OPTIC PARTS
146780 ABC LABORATORIES E3,82825 LAB SERVICES
146781 AWARDS&TROPHIES $11.94 PLAQUES
I... 146782 BFI MEDICAL WASTE SYSTEMS $4.00 WASTE DISPOSAL
146783 BKK LANDFILL $2,242,51 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10.&91
146764 BAUER COMPRESSOR $587.76 COMPRESSOR PARTS
146785 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. E2,652.65 LAB SUPPLIES
146780 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. E42030 TRUCK WASH TICKETS
146787 BENZ ENGINEERING,INC. $540.92 COMPRESSOR PARTS
146786 BLACK&VEATCH E20,812.25 ENGINEERING SERVICES P146
M789 BOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE $255.06 TRUCK REPAIRS
146790 BON-AWES E500.65 TRUCK PARTS
146791 BRENNERFIEDLER&ASSOC.,INC. $638.55 LAB SUPPLIES
146792 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. $613.09 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
146793 BUSH&ASSOCIATES,INC. $2,648.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.68-94
146794 GEM CORPORATION $536.12 LAB SUPPLIES
146795 CH2M HILL $99.318.84 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-31
146795 C.L TECHNOLOGY $720.00 GAS ANALYSIS SERVICES
146797 CALFON CONSTRUCTION $216.741.80 CONSTRUCTION 3-38-2
146798 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $107.24 SERVICE AGREEMENT
146799 CAMALI CORP. $400.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
146800 JOHN CARDLLO ENGINEERS $14.333.25 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-15.2
146801 JOHN CAROL-0 ENGINEERS $29.905.74 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-332,P1-38
146802 CENTURY SAFETY INST.&SUPPLY $138.83 LAB SUPPLIES
M803 CERFNET $41.56 SERVICE AGREEMENT
1468M COLE-PALMER INSTRUMENT CO. $1,255.83 LAB SUPPLIES
146805 COUCH AND SONS $18OZ6.38 CONSTRUCTION I1-17-1
9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 09/00/95 POSTING DATE 09MMS
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
146806 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $1,687.37 ENGINE PARTS
146807 COMPUTEMP $232.00 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
146808 CONNEL GM PARTS/DIV. $23.49 TRUCK PARTS
146809 CONSUMER PIPE $145.69 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
146810 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $5,128.31 MACHINE PARTS
146811 COUNTERPART ENTERPRISES $2,830.05 COMPRESSOR PARTS
146812 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $5,313.59 ELECTRIC PARTS
146813 THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY $175.00 TECHNICAL WORKSHOP REG.
146014 HSK/DECKER $1,159.89 GAUGE
146815 DEZURICKAND/ORCSCO. $26,678.83 VALVES
146816 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $1,329.92 SERVICE AGREEMENT
146817 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY S470.0D ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE
146815 DUNKEL BROS MACH.MOVING $1,100.00 MACHINE TRANSPORT
146819 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $1,957.51 PAINT SUPPLIES
1468" ERIM/MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL CONF. $880.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING REGISTRATION
146821 ESP NORTH $723.00 VALVES
X 146822 EASTMAN,INC. $5,947.79 OFFICE SUPPLIES
= 146823 EMERGENCY MGMT NETWORK $1,700.00 FIRST AID TRAINING
by 146824 ENCHANTER,INC. $3,500.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5.24-95
146825 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC, $867.70 LAB SERVICES
146826 EXECUTIVE SOFTWARE $16,529.85 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
Do 146827 FLUID TECH,SALES S815.42 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
N 146828 FST SAND AND GRAVEL,INC. $1,231.58 ROAD BASE MATERIALS
146829 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE S5,601.25 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91
146830 FIBERTRON $243.14 COMPUTER PARTS
146831 FILTERUNE CORP. $658.37 FILTERS
146832 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $68.31 FILTERS
146833 FIRST CHOICE $1,559.06 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT
146834 FIRST COMPANY&/OR NORTHERN DIST. $195.51 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
146835 FISCHER&PORTER CO. $19SS7 OFFICE SUPPLIES
146836 FLOSYSTEMS,INC. $251.89 PUMP PARTS
146837 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $20.38 PHOTO SUPPLIES
146838 THE FOXBORO CO. $1,569.74 INSTRUMENT PARTS
146839 FREEDOM IMAGING $76.65 SERVICE AGREEMENT
146MO FR1"S ELECTRONICS $557.17 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
146841 GIST,INC. $10.050.36 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
146842 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $276.41 LUMBERIHARDWARE
146843 CRY OF GARDEN GROVE S44,402.52 MANHOLE ADJUSTING M.0.6.8-94
146844 GENERAL BINDING CORP. $534.52 OFFICE SUPPLIES
146845 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1.232.19 TELEPHONE SERVICES
146846 GIERLICH-MRCHELL,INC. $3,650.81 PUMP PARTS
146847 GRASSY S.T.I. $546.83 PUMP PARTS
14684E THOMAS GRAY&ASSOC..INC. $567.00 LAB SERVICES
146649 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTNG $169.94 PRINTING
146850 DGA CONSULTANTS $12.459.62 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6S-94
146861 DAVID M.GRIFFITH&ASSOC. $11.491.22 PROFESSIONAL RECRUITING SERVICES
9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE PAGE 3
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 09/06195 POSTING DATE 09NB195
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
146852 HACH COMPANY $901.02 LAB SUPPLIES
W853 HARBOUR ENGINEERING $10,427.00 PUMP PARTS
146854 PL HAWN CO,INC. $9.013.21 FILTERS
146855 MAY GROUP,INC. $590.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION
146856 HELPMATES PERSONNEL SERVICES $1.690.83 TEMPORARY PERSONNEL SERVICES
146857 HOME DEPOT $232.15 HARDWARE
146858 PIS HUGHES CO,INC. $1.228.10 PAINT SUPPLIES
M859 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $16.356.83 WATER USE
146860 MICROBE MASTERS $305.35 FREIGHT
146861 IPCO SAFETY $3.722.75 SAFETY SUPPLIES
146862 ISCO,INC. $7.296.40 INSTRUMENTS
146863 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $59.450.71 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11-18-92
146864 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $931.72 CONNECTORS
146885 INFO EDGE,INC. $905.00 PUBLICATION
146866 ISI INFORTEXT $1.341.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
146867 INORGANIC VENTURES,INC. 5387.72 LAB SUPPLIES
X 146868 INSIDE E.P.A. 5535.00 SUBSCRIPTION-WATER POLICY RPT.I2YRS)
s 146669 INTELLIGENCE PRESS,INC. $790.00 SUBSCRIPTION-NATURAL GAS INTELLIGENCE
146870 IRVINE PHOTO GRAPHICS $5.56 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
W 146871 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $73.50 WATER USE
146872 GREAT WESTERN SANRARY SUPPLY. $390.92 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
fA 146873 JIM'S SUSPENSION SERVICE $25.00 TRUCK REPAIRS
I 146874 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $24.05 ELECTRIC PARTS
W 146875 KIMMERLE BROS.INC. $60.59 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
146876 KING BEARING,INC. $362.81 MACHINE SUPPLIES
145877 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $1.525.26 TOOLS/HARDWARE
14687E KROHNE AMERICA,INC. $771.10 INSTRUMENT PARTS
146879 L A CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $592.09 CELLULAR TELEPHONE CHARGES
146860 LEE 8 RO CONSULTING ENGR. $15,391.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES P140.2
146881 CRC PRESS.INC. $154.90 LAB SUPPLIES
146882 LIMITOROUE CORP. $4,721.31 ELECTRIC REPAIRS
146883 MPS $196.33 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
146884 MANLEYS BOILER REPAIR CO.,INC. $9.915.84 VALVE PARTS
146885 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $88,984.00 CONSTRUCTION P242-2
146886 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $763.87 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
146887 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO. $2,505.81 TOOLS
146888 CHUCK MCRANEY $561.49 REIMS.CONSTRUCTION CELLULAR PHONE
146689 MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. $80.17 GAUGE
146890 MESA VERDE COUNTRY CLUB $2,022.00 CONSTRUCTION CLEAN-UP
146891 MIDWAY MFG.8 MACHINING $3,705,86 MECHANICAL REPAIRS
146892 MILLTRONICS $143,84 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
146893 MINNESOTA WESTERN VISUAL PRIES. $212.DO PRINTING SUPPLIES
146894 MISCO $273.25 OFFICE SUPPLIES
146895 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3.287.01 UNIFORM RENTALS
146896 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO. $727.00 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
146897 MORTON SALT $500.52 SALT
9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE PAGE 4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 0910SM5 POSTING DATE 09/06/95
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
146898 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $70.35 SAFETY FILM RENTALS
146899 NEUTRON $8.749.18 ANIONIC POLYMER M.O.8-10.94
146900 NEW HORIZONS COMPUTER CENTER 57,200.00 COMPUTER TRAINING
146901 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $38.24 WATER USE
146902 NORTEL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS $2,754.00 SERVICEAGREEMENT
146903 OCEANS'95' $835.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION
146904 OMEGA CORP. $456.59 FIRE PROTECTION SUPPLIES
146905 ORACLE CORPORATION $461.00 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
146906 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $2,099.74 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
146907 ORANGE COURIER $133.65 COURIER SERVICES
146908 ORANGE VALVE 8 FITTING CO. $860.72 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
146909 ORRICK HERRINGTON B SUTCLIFFE $15,000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES-ARBITRAGE COMPLIANCE
146910 OXYGEN SERVICE 52,446.41 SPECIALTY GASES
146911 COUNTY OF ORANGE $96,486.62 PROPERTY ATTRIBUTES
146912 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $14.942.75 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP
m W913 COUNTY OF ORANGE $203.50 PERMIT FEES
X t46914 PCM $295.00 TECHNICAL SEMINAR REGISTRATION
146915 PSSI $1.069.20 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION
UO 146916 PACIFIC PARTS $38,623.67 INSTRUMENT PARTS
W917 PACIFIC BELL $1,233.86 TELEPHONE SERVICES
146918 PACIFIC WATER CONDITIONING CO. $298.80 EQUIPMENT RENTALS
bU 146919 PAK WEST $108.84 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
t 146920 PALMIERI,TYLER WIENER, $165.00 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.6-12-91
M921 PARAGON CABLE $36.78 CABLE SERVICES
146922 PARKHOUSE TIRE,INC. $1.901.79 TIRES
146923 PEERLESS WIPING MATERIALS $635.73 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
146924 PENN-MAYFLOWER $470.00 MOVING SERVICES
W925 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $6.349.38 REIMB.PETTY CASH,TRAINING B TRAVEL
146926 PICKWICK PAPER $69.50 STORAGE BOXES
146927 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $124,499.70 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3_29-95
146928 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS $43.413.74 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
146929 POLYPURE,INC. $19,979.47 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3.11-92
146930 POSTAGE BY PHONE $5,000.00 POSTAGE
146931 POWER LIFT/SCMH $416.14 SHELVES
146932 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $208.W ICE
146933 PROMINENT FLUID CONTROL,INC. $799.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
146934 RJN COMPUTER SERVICES,INC. $995.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION
146935 TRW-REDI PROPERTY DATA $568.11 PROPERTY INDEXES
146936 REMEDYTEMP $11AD5.92 TEMPORARY PERSONNEL SERVICES
146937 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY ' $7,134.48 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
146938 REINES ENGINEERING CO. $5.623.00 BUILDING SUPPLIES
W939 ROMAC SUPPLY COMPANY $605.95 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
146940 SANTA ANA RIVER FLOOD $1.100.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES
146941 BASCO ELECTRIC $3.307.00 ELECTRIC SERVICES
146942 R.CRAIG SCOTT&ASSOC. $7,756.69 LEGAL SERVICES-PERSONNEL ISSUES
146943 SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS,INC. $761.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE PAGE 5 ,
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 09/06/95 POSTING DATE 09/06/95
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
146944 SETHI DIVIMET PROD. $639.76 PUMP PARTS
146945 SEWER EQUIPMENT OF FLORIDA $452.85 FITTINGS
146946 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $2,578.03 TOOLS
146947 SHURELUCK SALES $5,743.64 HARDWARE
146948 SIEVERS INSTRUMENTS.INC. $55.00 LAB SUPPLIES
146949 SKILL PATH,INC. $99.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING REGISTRATION
146950 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $4,259.53 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS
146951 THE SMITH GROUP $9.498.30 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES-PERSONNEL
146952 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP. $193.95 TOOLS
146953 5O COAST AIR QUALITY $150.00 PERMIT FEES
146954 SOUTH COAST WATER $250.00 LAB SUPPLIES
146955 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. $71,437.08 POWER
146956 SO.CALIFORNIA MARINE INST. 5800.00 OCEAN MONITORING
146957 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. $24.249.49 DIESEUUNLEADED FUEL
- 146958 STANG INDUSTRIAL PRODS. $7,111.50 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
rn 146959 STATE STREET BANK $44.91 TRUSTEE SERVICES
X 146960 SUMMIT STEEL $813.88 METAL
ti 146961 SUNSET FORD $228.96 TRUCK PARTS
U7 146962 SUPELCO,INC. $220.44 LABSUPPLIES
146963 SUPER ICE CORP. $76.25 LAB SUPPLIES
146964 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $223.22 ELECTRIC CART PARTS
b0 146965 TAYLOR INDUSTRIAL SOFTWARE $5.485.03 COMPUTER SOFTWARE TRAINING
146966 TECHNICOMP $5,338.50 PUBLICATION
146967 TEKTRONIX,INC. $792.99 INSTRUMENT PARTS
146968 THEODORE ROBBINS FORD $2.909.24 VEHICLE RENTAL
146969 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $75.24 MECHANICAL PARTS
146970 TONY'S LOCK&SAFE SERVICE $212.89 LOCKS&KEYS
140971 TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY.INC. $3,973.84 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.0.5.11-94
146972 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $15262 TRUCK PARTS
146973 U.S.AUTO GLASS CENTERS $102.00 TRUCK PARTS
148974 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $264.50 LAB SUPPLIES
146975 UNISOURCEWOR BUTLER PAPER $329.68 OFFICE SUPPLIES
146978 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $507,34 PARCEL SERVICES
146977 VWR SCIENTIFIC $1.254.30 LAB SUPPLIES
146978 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $1,039.03 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
146979 VALLEY DETROIT DIESEL $381.28 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
146980 VERNE'S PLUMBING $110.00 PLUMBING SERVICES
146981 VERTEX TECHNOLOGIES,INC. $942.71 FIBER OPTIC SUPPLIES
146982 VILLAGE NURSERIES $570.94 LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES
146983 WATER ENVIRONMENT FED. $495.00 TECHNICAL SEMINAR REGISTRATION
146984 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $33,593.07 CAUSTIC SODA&HYPOCHLORIDE M.0.8-12-92&4-13.94
146985 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $473.18 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
146988 JUDITH A.WILSON $894.51 COBRA REIMBURSEMENT
146987 WITEG $393.29 LAB SUPPLIES
146988 ROURKE,WOODRUFF&SPRADLIN $109,272.54 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.2-19.92
146989 WOODWARD GOVERNOR CO. $21,01260 MACHINE REPAIRS
9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE PAGE 6
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID OW MIS POSTING DATE 0WIV95
WARRANT NO. VENDOR
146990 XEROX CORP. $5,400.11 COPIER LEASES
146991 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $13,949.65 LAB SUPPLIES
146992 RICHARD YOUNG PRODUCTS $281.89 OFFICE SUPPLIES
TOTAL CAIMS PAID 09/06/95 1,915,961.00
SUMMARY AMOUNT
01 OPER FUND $9,568.37
#1 CONSTR FUND 4.56
#2 OPER FUND 33.596.87
02 CAP FAD FUND 181,566.38
m 02 CONSTR FUND 12.54
X
_ #3 OPER FUND 130,491.82
#3 CAP FAC FUND 262,057.21
#3 CONSTR FUND 15.27
--I #5 OPER FUND 9.853.31
1A #6CONSTR FUND 5.264.67
I #5 CONSTR FUND 3.19
#7 OPER FUND 19,136.53
#7 CONSTR FUND 3.42
#11 OPER FUND 5,766.40
#11 CAP FAC FUND 2.195.00
#11 CONSTR FUND 5.93
#13 OPER FUND 1,266.10
#14 OPER FUND 59.01
#14 CAP FAC FUND 4,435.60
#596 OPER FUND 3,503.90
#6&7 OPER FUND 2,563.16
#7&14 OPER FUND 5,815.95
JT OPER FUND 599,246.29
CORE 369.101.55
SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND 31,663.69
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL 241,663.58
$1.918.961.00
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
OCTOBER 25, 1995
Agenda Item (8): Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying
payment of claims of the joint and individual
Districts (each Director shall be called only once
and that vote will be regarded as the same for each
District represented unless a Director expresses a
desire to vote differently for any District).
Summary
See attached listing of claim payments.
Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of payment of claims listing.
��wvoo�asuc eswnas+om
FUND NO 9199 - Jr DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/14M5 PAGE 1 0 -'
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 09/20/95 POSTING DATE 0920195
WARRANTNO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION -
147022 ACGIH,INC. $312.14 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
147023 AG TECH COMPANY $55,729.65 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91
147024 ATM AA,INC. $4.485.00 LAB SERVICES
147025 AT&T-BUSINESS LONG DISTANCE SERVICE $S.00 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
147028 A-ZLOGICSYSTEMS $233.64 MACHINE REPAIRS
147027 ACCOUNTANTS OVERLOAD $220.50 TEMPORARY PERSONNEL SERVICES
147028 ACTION DOOR REPAIR CORP. $340.76 DOOR REPAIRS
147029 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS,INC. $445,687.81 CONSTRUCTION P1-35-1
147030 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS,INC. $4,800.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
147031 AIR COLD SUPPLY,INC. $164.74 AIR CONDITIONER REPAIRS
147032 AIR PRODUCTS B CHEMICALS $18.037.20 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.O.8.9-09
147033 ALLIED ELECTRONICS $106.54 INSTRUMENT PARTS
147034 AMERICAN PROTECTIVE SER.,INC. $1,252.34 CONTRACT SECURITY SERVICES
147035 AMERICAN SIGMA $1,119.52 LAB SUPPLIES
147036 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION $12.461.82 SEWER REPAIRS
147037 ANALYSTS,INC. $1,657.49 MECHANICAL PARTS
147038 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL $330.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
147039 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $2,626.12 NOTICES&ADS
m 147040 APPLIED SIOSYSTEMS,INC. $1.376.35 LAB SUPPLIES
X 147041 ABC LABORATORIES $3,830.OD LAB SERVICES
2 147042 AQUATIC BIOSYSTEMS.INC. $235.00 LAB SERVICES
147043 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT $1,268.50 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
.-+ 147W ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. $60.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL
147045 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $3,924.60 PAYROLL SERVICES
y 147046 AWARDS B TROPHIES $162.79 PLAQUES
I 147047 BKK LANDFILL $2,509.03 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91
F� 147048 BANANA BLUEPRINT $4,223.40 PRINTING M.O.11-07.94
147049 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $1,929.29 BATTERIES
147050 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $4.275.31 LAB SUPPLIES
147051 BENZ ENGINEERING,INC. $270.95 COMPRESSOR PARTS
147052 WT BILLARD.INC. $249.60 BUILDING REPAIRS
147053 BID-GRO DIVISION $45,595.77 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.4-26-95
147054 BOOT BARN $113.03 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES
147055 THE BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFFAIRS $1,411.53 HUMAN RESOURCES PUBLICATION
147066 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. $289.21 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
147057 C.L.TECHNOLOGY $720.00 GAS ANALYSIS SERVICES
147058 CS COMPANY $2,455.08 HARDWARE/PLUMBING SUPPLIES
147059 CALTEX PLASTICS,INC. $1.071.00 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
147060 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $1.755.86 OFFICE FURNITURE
147061 CENTURY SAFETY INST.&SUPPLY $8,186.93 SAFETY SUPPLIES
147052 CHEMICAL ENGINEERING $50.00 SUBSCRIPTION
147083 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $87.28 SERVICEAGREEMENT
147054 COLE-PALMER INSTRUMENT CO. $821.87 LAB SUPPLIES
147085 COUCH&SONS $323,189.50 CONSTRUCTION 11-17-1
147066 COMPUSERVE $246.28 COMPUTER SERVICES
147067 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $839.04 ELECTRIC PARTS
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9114195 PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 092D/95 POSTING DATE 09/20/95
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
147068 CONSUMER PIPE $918.69 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
147069 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC. $338.76 TOOLS
147070 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $1.249.28 ENGINE PARTS
147071 COUNTY CLERK $342.00 CEOA FEES
147072 COUNTY CLERK $36.00 CEOA FEES
147073 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $2.610.12 ELECTRIC PARTS
147074 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $4.084.00 STATE UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE
147075 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $200.00 ANNEXATION FEE
147076 DAILY PILOT $144.00 NOTICES&ADS
147077 HSK/DECKER $404.91 INSTRUMENT PARTS
147070 DE GUELLE&SONS GLASS CO. $482.01 GLASS
147079 DELL COMPUTER CORP. $10,556.08 COMPUTER HARDWARE
147080 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIF. $47.435.78 DENTAL INSURANCE PLAN M.0dd2-94
147081 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $2.050.00 COMPUTER TRAINING
147082 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $940.00 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE
147083 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $1,781.00 PAINT SUPPLIES
147084 DYCAM,INC. $1.505.40 COMPUTER PARTS
147085 ESP NORTH $2.070.52 SECURITY SUPPLIES
m 147086 EASTMAN,INC. $991.83 OFFICE SUPPLIES
= 147087 EMPIRE SCALES CO. $32.65 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
147088 ENCHANTER,INC. $3,500.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5-24.95
147089 ENVIROGEN,INC. $5.029.00 BIOTRICKLING FILTER PROJECT
--1 147090 FMC CORPORATION $102,2114.91 HYDROGEN PEROXIDE M.O.944-94
147091 FST SAND AND GRAVEL,INC. $532.49 ROAD BASE MATERIALS
n 147092 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $8,322.50 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91
N 147093 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $501.00 AIR FREIGHT
147094 FISCHER&PORTER CO. $1,751.27 STRIP CHART PAPER
147095 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $2,317.40 LAB SUPPLIES
147096 FISIONS INSTRUMENTS $879.44 LAB SUPPLIES
147097 FLICKINGER CO. $1,637.96 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
147098 FLOSYSTEMS,INC. $8,964.88 PUMP PARTS
147099 FOSS MARITIME CO. $88.20 FREIGHT CHARGES
147100 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $154.87 PHOTO SUPPLIES
147101 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $321.23 PAINTSUPPLIES
147102 FOUR WHEEL PARTS WHOLESALER $339.73 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
147103 THE FOXBORO CO. $1,737.83 INSTRUMENT PARTS
147104 FRANCE COMPRESSOR PRODUCT $727.07 COMPRESSOR PARTS
147105 FRAZEE PAINT&WALCOVERING $189.10 PAINT SUPPLIES
147108 FRY'S ELECTRONICS $96.01 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
147107 GST,INC. $2,078.72 OFFICE SUPPLIES
1471BB GTE TELEPHONE OPERATIONS $12,053.00 RELOCATE TELEPHONE SYSTEM AT PLANT
147109 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $116.37 CHEMICALS
147110 GENERAL ALUMINUM FORGINGS $117.39 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
147111 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $3,898.80 ELECTRIC PARTS
147112 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $248.45 TELEPHONE SERVICES
147113 GENICOM CORPORATION $839.00 PRINTING SUPPLIES
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9114195 PAGE 3
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 09r2W95 POSTING DATE 09/20/95
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
147114 GIERUCH-MITCHELL,INC. $1,053.79 PUMP PARTS
147115 N.GLANTZ B SON,INC. $570.07 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
147118 GOLDEN BELL PRODUCTS $301.70 CLEANER
147117 GRAPHIC CONTROLS $235.48 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
147118 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $229.38 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
147119 GRASSY S.T.I. $2,497.85 ENGINE PARTS
147120 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $1,678.99 PRINTING
147121 DGA CONSULTANTS $11,343.49 ENGINEERING SERVICES 3.35R
147122 DAVID R.GRIFFIN $175,033.02 LEGAL SERVICES-TECHRE PIPE M.O.9-14-94
147123 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $1,037.64 TRUCK PARTS
147124 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $487.74 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
147125 PL HAWN CO,INC. $6,403.58 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
147126 HELPMATES PERSONNEL SERVICES $1,151.20 TEMPORARY PERSONNEL SERVICES
147127 HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT $2,083.33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN.
147128 HEWLETT PACKARD CO. $3,496.50 SERVICE AGREEMENT
147129 HILT],INC. $839.05 FITTINGS
147130 RC HOFFMAN AND/OR ISCO SI00.17 MACHINE REPAIRS
147131 HOME DEPOT $233.65 HARDWARE
Tn 147132 IRS HUGHES CO,INC. $790.70 SIGNS
= 147133 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $1,178.25 WATER USE
W 147134 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $22.036.13 PERMIT FEES
147135 HYCLONE LABORATORIES $733.63 LAB SUPPLIES
-4 147136 IPCO SAFETY $8,200.98 SAFETY SUPPLIES
D 147137 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $98,610.35 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11-18-92
I 147138 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $807.90 CONNECTORS
W 147139 INTUITIVE TECHNOLOGY $16,195.00 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
147140 J2 PRINTING SERVICES $604.48 PRINTING
147141 AT COMPUTER SOURCE,INC. $3,025.62 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
147142 JAMISON ENGINEERING,INC. $1,362.34 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
147143 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY. $357.06 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
1471" JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO. $1,001.20 GAUGE
147145 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $154.18 ELECTRIC PARTS
147146 JONES CHEMICALS,INC. $16.261.35 CHEMICALS
147147 KALLEEN'S COMPUTER PRODUCTS $175.01 COMPUTER SUPPLIES
147148 KING BEARING,INC. $304.86 MACHINE SUPPLIES
147149 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $161.48 HARDWARE
147150 L A CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $383.27 SERVICE AGREEMENTS
147151 LAWICRANDAL,INC. $1.675.00 SOIL TESTING 7.13.94
147152 LIMITORQUE CORP. $819.66 ELECTRIC REPAIRS
147153 THE LITIGATION GROUP $6,609.56 POST-TRIAL INTERVIEW-TECHRE PIPE
147154 LOCAL AGENCY $500.00 ANNEXATION FEES
147155 MPS $26.83 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
147156 MACOMCO 5464A0 SERVICE AGREEMENT
147157 MANDIC MOTORS $149.00 TOYING SERVICES
147158 MANHOLE ADJUSTING $7,900.00 MANHOLE ADJUSTING SERVICES
147159 MANLEYS BOILER REPAIR CO,INC. $978.75 BOILER REPAIRS
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9114195 PAGE
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 092W95 POSTING DATE 0920M
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
147160 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $66.23 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
147161 MASONEILAN N.AMER,OPERATIONS $3,553.60 INSTRUMENT PARTS
147162 MCMAHAN DESK,INC. $1,139A6 OFFICE FURNITURE
147163 MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. $1,407.44 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
147164 MICRO MOTION $5,186,36 INSTRUMENT PARTS
147165 MICROBIAL INSIGHTS,INC. $150.00 CONSULTING SERVICES M.0.11-18-92
147165 MICROBICS CORPORATION $856.08 OCEAN MONITORING
147167 MIDWAY MFG.&MACHINING $7,370.97 MECHANICAL REPAIRS
147160 MINNESOTA WESTERN VISUAL PRIES. $557.69 LAB SUPPLIES
147189 MISSION ABRASIVE SUPPLIES $553.20 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
147170 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3,848.97 UNIFORM RENTALS
147171 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO. $861.00 ELECTRIC PARTS
147172 MONITOR LABS $931.32 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
147173 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $380.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES
147174 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $674.80 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
147175 NEUTRON $7,014.50 ANIONIC POLYMER M.O.8-10-94
147176 NEW HORIZONS COMPUTER CENTER $4,800.00 COMPUTER TRAINING CLASSES
147177 NICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY $306.71 INDUSTRIAL GREASE
X 147178 OFFICE PAVILIONSANTERIOR RESOURCES $599.09 OFFICE FURNITURE REPAIRS
= 147179 OLE LEE,INC. $69.27 TRUCK PARTS
147180 OMEGA CORP. $375.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
.y 147181 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $7,400.44 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
-1 147182 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. $472.30 LAB SUPPLIES
n 147183 OXYGEN SERVICE $2,737.21 SPECIALTY GASES
I 147104 COUNTY OF ORANGE $401.50 PERMIT FEES
147185 PSI $117.06 HARDWARE
147186 PSSI $3.280.95 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION
147187 PACIFIC CLIPPINGS $126.70 NEWSPAPER CLIPPING SERVICES
147188 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $5.925.79 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
147189 PACIFIC PARTS $5,677.09 INSTRUMENT PARTS
147190 PACIFIC BELL 543.18 TELEPHONE SERVICES
147191 PAGENET $991.21 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
147192 PAINE WEBBER $42,020.63 COP REMARKETING FEES
147193 PAK WEST $1,376.18 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
147194 PARTS UNLIMITED $609.12 TRUCK PARTS
147195 PENINSULA PUMP CORP. $4,978.05 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
147196 PERMA SEAL $182.69 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
147197 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $5,484.94 REIMB.PETTY CASH,TRAINING&TRAVEL
147198 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $120,395.70 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3.29-95
147199 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS $315.72 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
147200 POLYPURE,INC. $22,416.41 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92
147201 POTTORFF COMPANY $64.53 ELECTRIC PARTS
147202 POWER SYSTEMS TESTING CO. 51,249.99 ELECTRICAL TESTING
147203 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $160.00 ICE
147204 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE IND. $2,280.00 SOILTESTING -
147205 PUBLIC SECTOR EXCELLENCE $6.O00.0O TRAINING CATALOG DEVELOPMENT&PRODUCTION
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/14/95 PAGE 5 -•
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 0MW% POSTING DATE 09MMS
WARRANTNO. VENDOR AMOUNT
147206 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $410.69 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS
147207 R&R INSTRUMENTS $2,496.36 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
147208 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $2.062.75 TRASH REMOVAL
147209 RED WING SHOES $206.88 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES
147210 REMEDYTEMP $2,490.84 TEMPORARY PERSONNEL SERVICES
147211 RM MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL $236.43 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
147212 ST ANDREWS MACHINE CO. $86.20 MACHINE REPAIRS
147213 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS 5975.50 ELECTRIC PARTS
147214 SANTA AMA PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL $2,221.43 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
147215 SANTA FE BAG CO. $297A5 OPERATING SUPPLIES
147216 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $551SB SPECIALTY GASES
147217 SEA COAST DESIGNS $3,012,23 OFFICE EOUIPMENT
147218 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $1.833.58 HARDWARE
147219 SHURELUCK SALES $60.85 HARDWARE
147220 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO. $132.37 LAB SUPPLIES
147221 SKILL PATH,INC. $359.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING REGISTRATION
147222 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $250.12 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS
147223 M.LEE SMITH PUBLISHERS&ASSOC. $387.00 CA SAFETY&HEALTH MONITOR SUBSCRIPTION
XRl 147224 SNAP-ON/SUN CORP. $1,521.37 INSTRUMENT
S 147225 SO COAST AIR QUALITY $150.00 PERMIT FEES
147226 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY $1,315.60 PERMIT FEES
.. 147221 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. $10,553.02 POWER
-I 147228 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $2,783.07 NATURAL GAS
n 147229 SO.CALIF.WATER CO. $54.65 WATER USE
1 147230 SOUTH SHORE $3,093.33 WINDOW WASHING SERVICES
147231 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER $2,929.34 DRINKING WATERICOOLER RENTALS
147232 WESTALLOY,INC. $463.97 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
147233 SPECIALIZED PRODUCTS CO. $1,090.91 TOOLS
147234 SPECTRON&ASSOCIATES $308.26 LAB SUPPLIES
147235 STERLINGART $90.99 OFFICE SUPPLIES
147236 SUPELCO,INC. $168.65 LAB SUPPLIES
147237 SUPERB ONE-HOUR PHOTO $11.31 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
147238 SUPER CHEM CORP. $406.82 CHEMICALS
147239 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $680A2 ELECTRIC CART PARTS
147240 TEKMAR COMPANY $700.86 LAB SUPPLIES
147241 TEL-A-TRAIN,INC. $196.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING REGISTRATION
147242 TELE-CELL,INC. $1,626.25 TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT
147243 THOMAS BROS MAPS 54,000.00 PRINTING
147244 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $497.15 MECHANICAL PARTS
147245 TONER SYSTEM INTERNATIONAL $1.400.21 PRINTING SUPPLIES
147246 TONY'S LOCK&SAFE SERVICE $82.56 LOCKS&KEYS
147247 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE,INC. $644.35 SAFETY SUPPLIES
147248 TREBOR ELECTRONICS $682.68 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
147249 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $216.84 TRUCK PARTS
147250 TRUESDAIL LABS $6,587.00 LAB SERVICES
147251 JG TUCKER&SON,INC. $28.32 INSTRUMENT PARTS
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/14/95 PAGES
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 092WOS POSTING DATE 092W95
WARRANTNO. VENDOR
147252 20TH CENTURY INSURANCE CO. $3,369.27 LIABILITY CLAIM
147253 U.S.AUTO GLASS CENTERS $70.31 TRUCK PARTS
147254 US RENTALS $13500 RENTAL EOUIPMENT
147255 UNISOURCEB/OR BUTLER PAPER $336.40 OFFICE SUPPLIES
147256 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $500.42 PARCEL SERVICES
147257 VWR SCIENTIFIC $627.03 LAB SUPPLIES
147258 VALLEY CRIES SUPPLY CO. $3.314.87 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
147259 VARIABLE SPEED DRIVES $1,495.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS
147260 VARIAN ASSOCIATES.INC. $685.06 LAB SUPPLIES
147261 WEFTEC'95 $605.00 BIOSOLIDS RECYCLING CONFERENCE REGISTRATION
147262 WACKENHUT CORP. $1,038.75 SECURITY SERVICES
147263 WAL-CON CONSTRUCTION CO. $121.328.87 CONSTRUCTION 5-37-3
147264 WARRINGTON $115.00 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS
147265 WATERS CORPORATION $8.459.48 LAB SUPPLIES
147256 WAXIE $1.067.85 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
147267 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $11,280.15 CAUSTIC SODA&HYPOCHLORIDE M.O.8-12-9254-13-94
147268 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. 5988.55 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
147269 XEROX CORP. $1.074.09 COPIER LEASES
m 147270 YELLOW SPRINGS INSTRUMENT CO. $54.74 INSTRUMENT PARTS
X 147271 JOHNSON YOKOGAWA CORP. $2.373.69 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
2
tv TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 920/95 12.090.326.08
a
D,
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/14/95 PAGE 7
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID D920/95 POSTING DATE 0W0195
WARRANT NO. VENDOR
SUMMARY _ AMOUNT
#1 CONSTR FUND 38,317.55
#2 OPER FUND 33.50
#2 CONSTR FUND 14,209.03
03 OPER FUND 37,355.15
93 CAP FAC FUND 182,849A3
#3 CONSTR FUND 14,032.44
#5 OPER FUND 16,024.16
#5 CAP FAC FUND 14.41
#5 CONSTR FUND 2,172.50
#6 CONSTR FUND 1,232.01
07 OPER FUND 4,620.15
97 CAP FAC FUND 579.72
#7 CONSTR FUND 2,126.09
#11 OPER FUND 10,676.78
m #11 CAP FAC FUND 324.080.55
2 #11 CONSTR FUND 1,526.31
413 CONSTR FUND 47.18
W #14 CAP FAC FUND 1.675.00
014 CONSTR FUND 2777.52
#536 CAP FAC FUND 121,382.77
A JT OPER FUND 620,187.44
v CORE 560,310.76
SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND 52.888.38
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL 115,727.22
$2,090,326.06
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 09/26N5 PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 10N4/95 POSTING DATE 10NN95
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
147292 A-1 FENCE CO INC. $630.00 GATE REPAIR
147293 ACWA/SALARY SURVEY §120.D0 SALARY B BENEFITS SURVEY
147294 AG TECH COMPANY §56 09.93 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91
147295 ASL CONSULTING ENGINEERS $1,807.50 ATWOOD SUBTRUNK PLAN PREPARATION
147296 ATM AA.INC. $150.00 LAB SERVICES
147297 AT&T-CELLULAR CR BR $1.87 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
147298 ACADEMIC PRESS $356.05 PUBLICATIONS
147299 ACCUSLUDGE $480.99 LAB SUPPLIES
147300 ADVANCED COOLING TECHNOLOGY $243.41 ELECTRICPARTS
147301 AIR LIOUIDE AMERICA CORP. $2.245.00 SPECIALTY GASSES
147302 ALHAMBRA FOUNDRY CO LTD $3,769.10 MANHOLE FRAMES&COVERS
147303 ASCE CONTINUING EDUCATION $402.50 SAFETY VIDEO PROGRAM
147304 AMERIDATA $851.23 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
147305 AMERICAN METAL BEARING CO $1,038.75 BEARINGS
147306 AMERICAN PROTECTIVE SERVICE,INC. §328.40 SECURITY SERVICE
147307 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION $5.229.25 SEWER REPAIRS
147308 BLAKE PANDERSON $171.85 CELLULAR PHONE REIMBURSEMENT
1473D9 ANIXTER-DISTRIBUTION $1,298.02 COMPUTER SUPPLIES
hl 147310 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $1,702.88 NOTICES&ADS
x 147311 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $952.45 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
2
147312 ABC LABORATORIES §7,795.00 LAB SERVICES
147313 ARMOR-VAC $1,680.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES
147314 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE.INC. §8,208.00 TOXIC WASTE REMOVAL
147315 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. $50.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL
147316 ASSOCIATED CONCRETE PRODUCTS $174.56 BUILDING MATERIALS
147317 ATKIN/JONES COMPUTER SERVICE $321.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT
147318 AWARDS B TROPHIES $14.09 PLAQUES
147319 BFI MEDICAL WASTE SYSTEMS §4.00 WASTE DISPOSAL
147320 BANCROFT-WHITNEY CO.. 11139.00 PUBLICATION
147321 BATTERY SPECIALTIES §120.25 BATTERIES
147322 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $3.317.73 LAB SUPPLIES
147323 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $431.30 TRUCK WASH TICKETS
147324 BIG-GRO DIVISION E52.443.84 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 4.26-95
147325 BLAIR-MARTIN CO,INC. §513.13 VALVE MANIFOLDS
147326 BOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE $468.70 TRUCK REPAIRS
147327 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $17.035.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7.18
147328 BUDGET JANITORIAL $3.330.00 JANITORIAL SERVICES MO 1-1244
147329 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. 552.14 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
147330 BUSH&ASSOCIATES,INC. E15.332.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.&8.94
147331 CALFON CONSTRUCTION $28,839.67 CONSTRUCTION 7-22&7-24
147332 CALTROL,INC. $1.965.26 HARDWARE
147333 CALIFORNIA AUTO COLLISION,INC. $1.198.08 TRUCK BODY REPAIR
147334 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $1,450.87 SERVICE AGREEMENT
147335 CDS MOVING EQUIPMENT $320.02 PLASTIC TOTE BOXES
147336 CAMALI CORP. $400.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
147337 CANUS CORPORATION 538,378.38 FIBEROPTICCABLE
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 09Q895 PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 1001/95 POSTING DATE 10M"5
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
147338 CARLETON ENGINEERS $1,260.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES-AIR QUALITY
147339 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $10,964.79 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-38,J-33
147340 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $275.11 OFFICE FURNITURE
147341 CENTURY SAFETY INST.B SUPPLY $4.199.08 SAFETY SUPPLIES
147342 CERFNET $32.50 COMPUTER SERVICES
147343 CHROME CRANKSHAFT,INC. $960.00 PUMP PARTS
147344 CLEMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL $14,708.05 CONSULTANT-LANDFILL PROJECT M07.31-95
147345 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $153.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
147346 COASTALMOTION $1,332-00 SEMI-ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP FEE
147347 COLE-PALMER INSTRUMENT CO. $150.69 LAB SUPPLIES
147348 COMPUSA,INC. $678.83 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
147349 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $5,447.40 ELECTRIC PARTS
147350 CONSUMER PIPE $1,384.43 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
147351_ CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC. $977.81 TOOLS
147352 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $2.235.59 ENGINE PARTS
147353 COUNTERPART ENTERPRISES $1,497.04 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
147354 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $514.02 ELECTRIC PARTS
147355 D.T.I. $50.00 CHEMICALS
m 147356 DE GUELLE&SONS GLASS CO $30100 SAFETY GLASS
X 147357 DEZURIK AND/OR CS CO. $4,521.19 VALVES
147350 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $8.109.33 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
147359 DISPOSABLE WASTE SYS.B OR JWC ENVIRONMENTAL $244.31 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
147360 ESP NORTH $112.81 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
147361 EASTMAN,INC. - $2,706.62 OFFICE SUPPLIES
147362 EDWARDS DIV.OF GS BLDG SYS. $62.35 SERVICE AGREEMENT
N 147363 EMERGENCY MGMT NETWORK $520.00 CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING
147364 ENCHANTER,INC. $4.200.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5.24-95
147365 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $1.011.70 LAB SERVICES
147366 FST SAND AND GRAVEL,INC. $769.35 ROAD BASE MATERIALS
147357 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $60.00 AIR FREIGHT
147368 FIBERTRON $1.192.01 FIBER OPTIC CABLE
147369 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $151.21 FILTERS
147370 FIRST CHOICE $389.84 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT
147371 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $101.42 LAB SUPPLIES
147372 FISONS INSTRUMENTS $11,527.36 SERVICE AGREEMENT
147373 CLIFFORD A FORKERT $826.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6894
147374 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $7.62 PHOTO SUPPLIES
147375 FREEDOM IMAGING $89.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
147376 FRY'S ELECTRONICS $8,450.05 ELECTRONIC&COMPUTER SUPPLIES
147377 GST,INC. $210.38 OFFICE SUPPLIES
147378 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $1,670.25 LUMBER/HARDWARE
147379 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $8,696A2 TELEPHONE SERVICES
147380 GIERLICH-MITCHELL,INC. $7.110.12 PUMP PARTS
147381 BEVERLY MAY GILLOIM $395.18 PAYROLL DEDUCTION REIMBURSEMENT
147382 GOVT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOC. $55.00 PUBLICATIONS
147383 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $1.077.29 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0912B195 PAGE 3
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 10IMS POSTING DATE 10/04/95
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
147384 GRASSY S.T.I. $857.00 ENGINE PARTS
147385 DGA CONSULTANTS $10,707.77 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.641-94
147386 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. S429.03 TRUCK PARTS
147387 HACH COMPANY $2.939.22 LAB SUPPLIES
147388 HATCH&KIRK INC. $309.69 TRUCK PARTS
147389 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS $4.055.00 CONTAINER RENTALS
147390 HELPMATES PERSONNEL SERVICES $1,036.08 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
147391 HEWLETTPACKARD $53.88 SERVICE AGREEMENT
147392 HOLMES B NARVER,INC. $36.972.96 ENGINEERING SERVICES MO 9.14-94
147393 HOME DEPOT $84.62 HARDWARE
147394 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $665.90 PAINT SUPPLIES
147395 IPCO SAFETY $3.465.49 SAFETY SUPPLIES
147396 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $79.552.98 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.OA 1.18-92
147397 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $1.080.25 CONNECTORS
147398 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. $571.01 TRUCK PARTS
147399 CLEAN AIR REPORT $565.00 PUBLICATION
147400 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $573.82 BATTERIES
147401 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT 567.02 WATER USEAGE
m 147402 J2 PRINTING SERVICES $321.10 PRINTING
X 147403 JAMES INSTRUMENTS,INC. $1.527.00 ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT
147404 JAMISON ENGINEERING $1,588.98 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
lA 147405 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY. $203.86 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
1474M KENNEDY HYDRAULICS $431.69 MOTOR REPAIRS
147407 KING BEARING,INC. $4.933.03 MACHINE SUPPLIES
tz 147408 KLEINFELDER $1.552.95 GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTING SERVICES
W 147409 KNOX INDUSTRULL SUPPLIES $5.755.50 TOOLS
147410 LASERALL CORP. $1.034.81 PRINTER REPAIR
147411 LEE B RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC. $5.297.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES
147412 JAMES E.LENIHAN COMPANY $12,700.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
147413 LEWCO ELECTRIC $77.27 TRUCK PARTS
147414 LIMRORQUE CORP. $2,883.19 ELECTRIC PARTS
147415 SOCO-LYNCH CORP $117.58 JANITORIAL SERVICES
147416 MACOMCO $464.10 SERVICE AGREEMENT
147417 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $285.268.00 CONSTRUCTION P242-2
147418 MCKENNA ENGR.8 EQUIP. $272.46 PUMP PARTS
147419 MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. $903.78 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
147420 MIDWAY MFG.B MACHINING $225.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS
147421 MISSION INDUSTRIES $4,601.30 UNIFORM RENTALS
147422 MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION $38.369.36 CONSTRUCTION Mi-IA
147423 MORELAND B ASSOCIATES $15,843.50 AUDITING SERVICES MO 3-5-95
147424 MORTON SALT $416.57 SALT
147425 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION $461,76 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL FEE
147426 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $70.35 SAFETY FILM RENTALS
147427 NEUTRON $5.254.08 ANIONIC POLYMER M.O.8-10.94
147428 NEW HORIZONS COMPUTER CENTERS,INC. S4,800.00 SOFTWARE TRAINING CLASSES
147429 NICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY $1.514.76 LUBRICANTS/DIESEL FUEL
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 09/2895 PAGE 4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 10/04/96 POSTING DATE 10/04/95
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
147430 NORTEL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS SST53 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS
147431 OI CORPORATION $671.90 LAB SUPPLIES
147432 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $452.79 SAFETY GLASSES
147433 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION . $7.18 OFFICE SUPPLIES
147434 ORACLE CORPORATION $14,287.65 SOFTWARE
147435 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL $1,420.73 CHEMICALS
147436 ORANGE COUNTY FARM SUPPLY $852.35 CHEMICALS
147437 ORANGE COURIER $96.60 COURIER SERVICES
147438 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. $575.76 FITTINGS
147439 OXYGEN SERVICE $1,283.70 SPECIALTY GASES
147440 COUNTY OF ORANGE $735.00 - USER FEE CHANGE PROCESSING
147441 CSDOC WORKERS COMP INSURANCE ACCOUNT $2,145.89 WORKERS COMPENSATION REIMBURSEMENT
147442 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $1,259.95 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
147443. PACIFIC PARTS $26.260.58 INSTRUMENT PARTS
147444 PACIFIC BELL $1,354.18 TELEPHONE SERVICES
147445 PASCAL&LUDWIG,INC. $51,191.00 CONSTRUCTION PI-38.2
147446 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $7,890.77 REIMS.PETTY CASH,TRAINING&TRAVEL
147447 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $107.365.50 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3-29-95
f+T 147448 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS $22,750.00 CONSULTING SERVICE
X 147449 PIINEY BOWES $83.69 POSTAGE METER TAPE
147450 - POLYMETRICS,INC. $1,262.75 LABSUPPLIES
Cd 147451 POLYPURE,INC. 534,023.88 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3.11-92
_I 147452 POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO. SSS0A0 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
147453 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE - $160.00 ICE FOR SAMPLES
147454 PROMINENT FLUID CONTROL,INC. $799.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL
r 147455 REISH MARINE STUDIES,INC. $960.00 OCEAN MONITORING
147456 RELIANCE ELECTRIC $1.575.82 ELECTRIC PARTS
147457 REMEDYTEMP $1.830.40 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
147458 RM MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL AND/OR RITTAL $169.63 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
147459 ROSEMOUNT ANALYTICAL,INC. S868A2 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
147460 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS $487.75 ELECTRIC PARTS
147461 SANTA FIE BAG CO. $243.11 FREIGHT
147462 SANWA BANK $9.086.42 CONSTRUCTION 14AAA
147463 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INT'L $221,921.12 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-8-94
147464 R.CRAIG SCOTT&ASSOC. $8.922.40 LEGAL SERVICES-PERSONNEL ISSUES
147465 SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS,INC. 8232.00 LAB REPAIRS
147456 SELCO PRODUCTS CO. $413.58 METER CONNECTOR
147467 SENTIENT SYSTEMS,INC. $10,800.00 FACILITATOR SERVICES-EXECUTIVE RETREAT
147468 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $46.11 TOOLS
147469 SHURELUCK SALES $2,724.55 TOOLSMARDWARE
147470 SMITH-EMERY CO. $405.00 SOIL TESTING M.0.7-13-94
147471 WALTER SMITH&ASSOCIATES $899.00 EMMISSIONS WORKSHOP
147472 SOUTH COAST WATER $160.00 LAB SUPPLIES
147473 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. $70.765.05 POWER
147474 SO.CAL GAS.CO. $2,183.29 NATURAL GAS
147475 STAMEN Z.SPASSOFF P.E. $12,BD0.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19-2
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0928MS PAGE 5
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 10/04/95 POSTING DATE 10/04/95
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
447476 SPECIAL PLASTIC SYSTEMS,INC. $110.71 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
1474T7 SPECIALIZED PRODUCTS CO. $110.03 OFFICE TOOLS
147478 SPIDERS PAPER $85.10 OFFICE SUPPLIES
147479 SUMMIT STEEL 9339.41 METAL
147490 TEKTRONIX,INC. $1,285.71 INSTRUMENT PARTS
147481 TELEDYNE ANALYTICAL $153.31 INSTRUMENT PARTS
147482 THEODORE ROBBINS FORD $2,909.24 VEHICLE RENTAL-SUMMER PROGRAM
147483 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $1.462.89 MECHANICAL PARTS
147484 TONYS LOCK 9 SAFE SERVICE $90.63 LOCKS&KEYS
147485 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $74.01 TRUCK PARTS
147486 TRUESDAIL LABS $150.00 LAB SERVICES
147487 JG TUCKER B SON,INC. $3,291.18 INSTRUMENT PARTS
147488 USA BLUE BOOK $358.34 PUBLICATION
147489 UNISOURCEWOR BUTLER PAPER $442.61 OFFICE SUPPLIES
147490 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $5161 PARCEL SERVICES
147491 UNITED VAN LINES,INC. $8,584.80 RELOCATION SERVICES
147492 VWR SCIENTIFIC $998.53 LAB SUPPLIES
147493 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $2.33 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
m 147494 VALLEY DETROIT DIESEL $1,153.46 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
X 147495 VERNES PLUMBING $265.00 PLUMBING SERVICES
147496 VERTEX SYSTEMS $1,83&00 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT
CO 147497 WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION $257A5 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT COURSES
147498 WAXIE $5.533.70 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
147499 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $10,970.50 CAUSTIC SODA 8 HYPOCHLORIDE M.O.8-12-92 8 4-13-94
LA 147500 ROURKE.WOODRUFF 8 SPRADLIN $124,885.82 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.2-19-92
147501 YELLOW SPRINGS INSTRUMENT CO. $6179 LAB SUPPLIES
147502 RICHARD YOUNG PRODUCTS $418.29 INSTRUMENT PARTS
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 10/04/95 $1,694,367.04
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 09/26/95 PAGES
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID IQM4196 POSTIN0DATEID/04/9S
SUMMARY AMOUNT
#1 OPER FUND $225.00
02 OPER FUND $3.725.95
02 CAP PAC FUND $35.780.46
03 OPER FUND $34.380.66
#3 CAP FAC FUND $46.873.04
#5 OPER FUND $11.616.76
07 OPER FUND $6.135.01
#7 CAP FAC FUND $55,867.56
011 OPER FUND $861.43
#11 CAP FAC FUND $16,000.45
#14 OPER FUND $762.17
#14 CAP FAC FUND $47,688.68
0596 OPER FUND $2.741.59
#S86 CAP FAC FUND $1.354.37
#897 OPER FUND $2,930.72
#7&14 OPER FUND $5.643.39
JT GRER FUND $797.137.03
CORF $461,766.16
m SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND - $25.857.34
X
2 Jr DIST WORKING CAPITAL E135,017.29
w $1.694,367.04
lb
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKINO CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10AIM PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 10/0MS POSTING DATE 10MRS
WARRANTING. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
147503 ACORN CONSULTING $1.430.00 CONSULTING SERVICES
$1.430.00
SUMMARY AMOUNT
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $1,430.00
E7,430.00
m
x
x
I"
tv
V
v
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
OCTOBER 25, 1995
Agenda Item (9)(a) Consideration of the following actions relative to the
Purchase of Three Cab and Chassis with Crane
Mounted Service Body, Specification No. V-008
(1) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter dated September 28, 1995, from
Maurice J. Sopp Truck Center, apparent low bidder, requesting that they be allowed
to withdraw their bid for said purchase due to a miscalculation and approving said
request
(2) Consideration of motion receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation
and awarding purchase order for Purchase of Three Cab and Chassis with Crane
Mounted Service Body, Specification No. V-008, to Mike McCarthy Buick & GMC
Truck, for the amount not to exceed $124,346.37, plus sales tax.
Summary
Sealed bids were received on September 19, 1995, for the Purchase of Three Cab and Chassis
with Crane Mounted Service Body, Specification No, V-008. Ten bids were received. The low bid
was$124,346.37, and the high bid was$134,559.18, plus sales tax. One lower bid was received
from Maurice J. Sopp Truck Center for a total amount of$60,519.06, The supplier miscalculated
his quotation and has requested in writing to have his bid withdrawn from consideration. Staff
recommends the bid from Maurice J. Sopp Truck Center be rejected as requested. The three
new vehicles will be designated as follows:
CITY. DIVISION DESCRIPTION
Two 3330 These trucks will be assigned to the Plant
Plant Maintenance Maintenance Division replacing two 1973 Dodges
with 82,600 and 52,900 miles,which will be sent to
auction. Bodies are completely rusted out and parts
are no longer available.
One 3340 This truck will be used for maintenance on limited
Collection hard-to-access outlying pump stations, and for
standby personnel to tarty necessary spill response
equipment needed for sanitary sewer overflows.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends award of Purchase of Three Cab and Chassis with Crane Mounted Service
Body, Specification No. V-008, be made to Mike McCarthy Buick&GMC Truck, the lowest
responsible bidder, in the amount of$124,346.37, plus sales tax. Sufficient funds are in the
1995-95 Fiscal Year Budget to cover this acquisition.
G1w URC"GENGAnMWGPS074M
MAUwce a. S AND Son
u 6400 SO.ATLANTIC BOULEVARD `� � �� BELL,CALIFORNIA 90201-2597
8eLF8 AIlo8GVICE—M 19u
(213) S62.8600 Mailing Address: Post Office Box 311
Bell,CA 90201-0091
CO. SANITATION OF ORANGE CO. DIST. , CALIF. 9-20-95
P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIF. 92708
ATTN PENNY KYLE
RE: BID #V-008
DEAR PENNY:
PLEASE ALLOW SOPP TRUCK CENTER TO WITHDRAW OUR BID PROPOSAL
THAT WE SUBMITTED ON 9-19-95 AT 11:00 A.M. FOR THE FOLLOWING
REASONS WE FORGOT TO ADD THE PRICE OF THE SPECIAL UTILITY
BODY THAT WAS REQUIRED AS A PACKAGE. IT WAS AN ERROR THAT WE
OBVIOUSLY CAUGHT AFTER THE OPENING. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS
FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME AT (213) 562-8614
LY,
R CHARD PEREZ
U
FLEET SALES
' September 28, 1995 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
Al ORANGE COUNTY. CAUFORNIA
- MEMORANDUM
_ v
10844 ELLIS GVENuf
vo FBUNT<IN vell EY CALIFORNIA 9272BA127 Box B121
,
TO: Edwin E. Hodges, Director of Maintenance 11.1 ye2.2411
FROM: Katherine Yarosh, Senior Buyer
SUBJECT: Purchase of Three Cab and Chassis with Crane Mounted Service Body
Specification No V-008
Sealed bids were opened September 19, 1995, for the Purchase of Three Cab and Chassis with Crane
Mounted Service Body, Specification No V-008. Tabulation of bids is as follows:
COMPANY TOTAL PRICE
Mike McCarthy GMC Truck
Westminster, CA $124.346.37
Fuller Ford
Chula Vista, CA $125,253.00
Pacific Empire Volvo GMC
Riverside, CA $125.607.00
Nicholas Chevrolet
Garden Grove, CA $125.916.45
Carmenita Truck Center
Santa Fe Springs, CA $128,034.00
Victor Buick GMC Truck
Corona, CA $128,544,00
Bell PontfacIGMC
El Monte, CA $128,700.00
George Chevrolet
Bellflower, CA $130,260,00
Downey Ford
Downey, CA $134.559.18
Maurice J. Sopp Truck Center
Huntington Park, CA $60,519.06 '
' The supplier miscalculated his quotation and has requested in writing to have his bid withdrawn from consideration.
Staff recommends award of Purchase of Three Cab and Chassis with Crane Mounted Service Body,
Specification No. V-008, be made to Mike McCarthy Buick& GMC Truck, Westminster, the lowest
responsible bidder in the amount of$124,346.37, plus sales tax.
Approved by:
f / A .
Ted Hoffman,
Purchasing Manager
G:1W PIPURCHIHELLERSIDSAGP5074.95
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
OCTOBER 25, 1995
Agenda Item (9)(b): Consideration of the following actions regarding the
transportation and disposal of residual solids.
(1) Consideration of motion to approve a contract extension with Falcon Disposal
Services, Inc. (Falcon)for transportation of residual solids for disposal, for a
six-month period beginning October 30, 1995, for the existing contract unit
price of$260.00 per load for grit and screening and $12.08 per ton for sludge;
and authorizing the General Manager to execute said agreement. The
estimated cost for the six-month period is $100,000.
(2) Consideration of motion to approve a contract extension with BKK
Corporation (BKK) for disposal of residual solids for a six-month period
beginning October 30, 1995, for the existing contract unit price of$31.38 per
ton for grit, screenings, and sludge; and authorizing the General Manager to
execute said agreement. The estimated cost for the six-month period is
$65,000.
Summary
The Districts wastewater treatment process begins with separating solids from the
wastewater in the headworks area of the treatment facilities. Material removed by the
barscreen (called screenings) and material removed by the grit chambers (called grit) is
currently disposed of at the BKK Corporation landfill in the City of Covina. Falcon Disposal
Services, Inc. (Falcon) is the hauling company that currently transports the residual
material to the point of disposal (the BKK landfill). The Districts currently send
approximately two loads of grit and screenings material to BKK each day and about 100
tons of cleaning bed sludge per month.
The current contracts with Falcon and BKK expire on October 29, 1995. BKK has recently
notified the Districts of the pending closure of its Covina facility in mid-1996 and staff is
requesting the extension while it is considering alternatives. Districts staff is currently
initiating screenings research, a literature search and intend to develop a Request for
Proposal to bid alternative disposal methods.
A Proposal for Extension from Falcon was received on October 11, 1995 for transporting
grit, screenings and sludge to the BKK landfill for the six month period beginning
October 30, 1995. Falcon proposes to extend at the current prices for said period. The
estimated cost for the contract period is $100,000.
A Proposal for Extension from BKK was received on October 11, 1995, for disposal of grit,
screenings and sludge to the BKK landfill in the City of Covina for the six month period
beginning October 30, 1995. BKK proposes to extend at the current contract prices. The
estimated cost for the six-month contract period is $65,000.
Staff Recommendation
1. Staff recommends award of a contract extension to Falcon Disposal Services, Inc.
for transportation of residual solids for disposal for a six-month period, beginning
October 30, 1995, for the existing contract unit price of$260.00 per load for grit and
screening and $12.08 per ton for sludge; and authorizing the General Manager to
execute an agreement. The estimated contract cost for the six-month period is
$100,000.
2. Staff recommends award of a contract extension to BKK Corporation for disposal of
residual solids for a six-month period, beginning October 30, 1995, for the existing
contract unit price of $31.38 per ton for grit, screenings, and sludge; and authorizing
the General Manager to execute an agreement. The estimated contract cost for the
six-month period is $65,000.
Report By: Esouer
JAWPD0CSSVG9M0CTM1009s Dept.Head Approval: Doan
OCT 12 '� 0223 CRcFJ:-IE1D QiJIRO P.1
1
� 6R�4Y76CG'YNah7faYL0!
October 12, 1885
Sent Vla Fax # (714) 855-0728
Ms. Kethehne Yarosh
Senior Buyer
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
108" Ells
Fountain Valley, California 82708-7018
Re: Agreement between County Sanitation Districts of Orange County and
Falcon Disposal for Transportation of Residuals Solids
AW Dear Katherine:
Plesae be advised that our company agrees to extend the above referenced
contract for a period of six months at the current contract rates.
It Is understood that the BKK Landfill has agreed to Wend their contract in
conjunction with this extension.
We will look forward to reviewing the Impending RFP we discussed during our
telephone conversation.
Sincerely,
GREENFIELD ENVIRONMENTAL
Falc4D11seal
Cha8Vicent
ap,unn,xmesr
raerw,uromt
nmunuoo
qt.plmeU�
Bull LenOnll
lC\` B r . 011 �aa.A
CORPORATION
Rmmsmn
re.:tmm aa�
October 11, 1995
Ms. Katherine Yarosh
Orange County Sanitation DLsuicts
10944 Ellis Ave
Fountain Valley, CA 92708
Subject: Extension of Current Disposal Agreement
Dear Ms. Yarosh:
By this letter, BKK Landfill will agree to an extension of the existing disposal agreement for
the receipt of residual solids from County Sanitation District. BKK will agree to an extension
at the current rates for a period not to exceed six months. This period should provide the
District with the time needed tu complete the new contracting process.
The current base rate applied to the contract is $26.00 per tun, plus all current fees and taxes.
The applicable lets and taxes ace as follows:
Wcst Covina City License Tax - 10% of the Disposal Fee
L.A. County Solid Waste Management Fee - $0.86 per ton
California Slat:Solid Waste Disposal Fee - $1.34 per ton
Administrative Fee - $0.11 per ton
West Covina City Local Enforcement Agency Reimbursement Fee - $0.22 per ton
Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to call.
Si y,
L ;
Ann Cullen
Contract Administrator
Z /Z #OOM 7119W )DM 80:81 ' 26-11-OI' ML X01M:A9 1AL]S
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
FF OCTOBER 25, 1995
District 1
Agenda Item (9)(C): Consideration of motion approving Settlement
Agreement with Alphanetics, Inc. and Francisco
Lopez in the amount of
$42,000.00 as a result of wastewater discharge violations.
Summary
Pursuant to the provisions of the Clean Water Act and the General Pretreatment Regulations,the Districts
regulate,by permit and ordinance,the discharge of industrial wastewater from over 420 Significant
Industrial Users into the Districts'sewerage system. Enforcement of the Districts'"Pretreatment Program"
is essential to ensure compliance with federal and state mandates applicable to the Districts through our
NPDES permit.
To determine the status of the effluent discharges by Alphanetics,Inc.,a circuit board facility located in
Santa Ana,CA,the Districts initiated a downstream sampling program between August 1994 and May
1995. The results of the downstream sampling for the subject time period establish that,on numerous
occasions,Alphanetics,Inc.failed to comply with the discharge limits in the Districts'Wastewater Discharge
Regulations(Ordinance)and in the Federal Categorical Pretreatment Standards. On July 31, 1995,the
Districts transmitted to Alphanetics,Inc. and Francisco Lopez,President of Alphanetics,Inc. (collectively
"Alphanefics")an Administrative Complaint identifying the discharge violations. Pursuantto Calitomia
Government Code Section 54740.5 and Section 6150.6 of the Districts'Ordinance,staff recommended
that Alphanetics pay$52,500 based on Alphanetics'violations of its wastewater discharge limits for copper
and lead on nineteen sampling days between August 1, 1994 and May 31. 1995.
Pursuant to Resolution No. 93-13,negotiations have taken place among Districls'staff,legal counsel,and
Mphanetics. Based on the results of these negotiations, Districts'staff recommends the settlement of all
matters related to the enforcement action by entering into a Settlement Agreement, and requiring
Alphanetics to pay$42,000 over a period of 27 months in settlement of the alleged violations. Alphanefics
has represented its willingness to settle on these terms.
Staff Recommendation
Receive and file Staff Report dated October 2, 1995, and pursuant to Article IV,Section 4.3 of Districts'
Resolution No.93-13(Settlement of Civil Administrative Enforcement Actions),authorize staff to enter into
a Settlement Agreement with PJphanetics,in a form acceptable to General Counsel and requiring
Alphanetics to pay the amount of$42,000 in equal installments over a period of 27 months. Consistent with
other Source Control settlement agreements,interest will be charged at an annual rate of 10%if
PJphanetics fails to make timely payment pursuant to the Agreement.
j,1wR15pptAValeUlD07ARD
a
1 a
�m
October 2, 1995
STAFF REPORT
Request for Authorization to Enter into a Settlement Agreement Between
Alphanetics, Inc. And Francisco Lopez, and County Sanitation District No. 1
BACKGROUND
Pursuant to the provisions of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. §1251 et. seq.) and the
General Pretreatment Regulations (40 CFR Part 403), the Districts regulate, by permit
and ordinance, the discharge of industrial wastewater from over 420 Significant
Industrial Users into the Districts' sewerage system. Enforcement of the Districts'
"Pretreatment Program" is essential to ensure compliance with federal and state
mandates applicable to the Districts through our NPDES permit and to ensure the
environmentally safe operation of the Districts' treatment facilities.
In order to determine the status of the effluent discharges by Alphanetics, Inc., a
circuit board facility located in Santa Ana, CA, the Districts initiated a downstream
sampling program between August and November 1994, and January and May 1995.
The results of the downstream sampling for the subject time period establish that, on
numerous occasions, Alphanetics, Inc. failed to comply with the discharge limits in the
Districts' Wastewater Discharge Regulations (Ordinance) and in the Federal
Categorical Pretreatment Standards. On July 31, 1995, the Districts transmitted to
Alphanetics, Inc. and Francisco Lopez, President of Alphanetics, Inc. (collectively
"Alphanetics") an Administrative Complaint identifying the discharge violations.
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54740.5 and Section 615.D.6 of the
Districts' Ordinance, staff recommended that Alphanetics pay $52,500 based on
Alphanetics' violations of its wastewater discharge limits for copper and lead on
nineteen sampling days between August 1, 1994 and May 31, 1995. In addition, the
Districts' staff recommended that, as a consequence of Alphanetics misrepresenting
its self-monitoring sampling results for the same time period designated above,
Alphanetics' permit be suspended for five consecutive working days commencing the
day after the Districts' Order of Permit Suspension becomes final.
Following issuance of the Administrative Complaint, Alphanetics made several
changes to its operations to ensure future compliance. Alphanetics terminated its
contract with the individual who had been in charge of compliance with wastewater
discharge requirements on a day-to-day basis. Alphanetics also hired and trained a
CSDOC 0 P.O. Box 8127 0 Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 6 (714) 962-2411
A
P
Staff Report - Alphanetics, Inc.
Page 2 of 2
October 2, 1995
treatment operator, and improved the operation and maintenance procedures at its
facility to ensure long-term compliance. After making these changes, Alphanetics
indicated to Districts' legal counsel and staff that it was willing to settle all matters
related to these enforcement proceedings through payment of $42,000 payable over
a 27-month period. The Districts' staff recommends acceptance of this settlement.
Districts' staff believes that the proposed agreement and the administrative penalties
are a reasonable and cost-effective settlement of Alphanetics' violations and will be a
deterrent to future violations.
A hearing regarding suspension of Alphanetics' Industrial Wastewater Discharge
Permit and the assessment of penalties was originally scheduled for September 13,
1995. The hearing was continued until November 16, 1995, at the request of
Alphanetics in order to allow continuation of the settlement negotiations with the
Districts' staff. If the proposed settlement is approved by the Districts' Board of
Directors, the hearing will be cancelled, and the Settlement Agreement will be
executed on behalf of District No. 1.
RECOMMENDATION
Receive and file Staff Report dated October 2, 1995, and pursuant to Article IV,
Section 4.3 of Districts' Resolution No. 93-13 (Settlement of Civil Administrative
Enforcement Actions), authorize staff to enter into a Settlement Agreement with
Alphanetics, in a form acceptable to General Counsel and requiring Alphanetics to
pay the amount of $42,000 in equal installments over a period of 27 months.
Consistent with other Source Control settlement agreements, interest will be charged
if Alphanetics fails to make timely payment pursuant to the Agreement.
MT/AR:cg/lvw
J:\WP\1i9]WIIWE\FlP9IAFF
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
MEETING
AGENDA FOR
OCTOBER 25, 1995
Item (11)(a): Minutes of the Executive Committee
Summary
(1) Receive and file Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization Study Committee Minutes for the
meetings held on July 14, 1995 and September 13, 1995.
(2) Receive and file draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on September 27, 1995.
(3) Receive and file draft Minutes of Operations,Maintenance,and Technical Services Committee for
the meeting held on October 4, 1995.
(4) Receive and file draft Minutes of Planning, Design and Construction Committee for the meeting
held on October 5, 1995.
(5) Receive and file draft Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the
meeting held on October 11, 1995.
(6) Receive and file draft Minutes of Meeting of Ad Hoc Committee re Landfill Issues held on
October 18, 1995.
(7) Receive and file draft Executive Committee Minutes for the meeting held on October 18, 1995.
Sommery
See attached minutes.
Executive Committee Recommendation to the Joint Boards of Directors
Receive and file minutes listed above.
J�Iwc.
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County,California
P.O.Box 8127.10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley,CA 92728.8127
Telephone: (714)962-2411
DRAFT
MINUTES OF AD HOC COMMITTEE
MEETING
Friday. July 14, 1995 at 5:00 o.m.
A meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee of
the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11. 13, and 14 of Orange County,
California was held on Friday, July 14, 1995, at the Districts'Administrative Office.
(1) ROLLCALL
Those present were as follows:
AD HOC COMMITTEE: STAFF PRESENT:
John Collins, PDC Comm. Chair Don McIntyre, General Manager
John Cox, Joint Chair Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair John Linder, Director of Engineering
Don Griffin, Past Joint Chair Steve Hovey, Director of Information
Technology
Paul Mitchell, Engineering Supervisor
(2) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments received.
(3) APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of the July 6, 1995 Ad Hoc Committee were approved as written.
(4) REPORTS OF COMMITTEE CHAIR, GENERAL MANAGER, AND DIRECTOR OF
ENGINEERING
There were no reports.
(5) NEW AND MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS
There were none.
Minutes of Ad Hoc Committee Meeting
Page 2
July 14, 1995
(6) OLD BUSINESS
(a) The draft Scope of Work for space utilization study was discussed. The
Committee was asked to review the draft Scope with the current revisions
and return as soon as possible. The Scope will be revised and returned to
this Committee for review prior to sending out with Request for Proposals
(RFP) to selected consultants.
(b) The modifications to the Administration space were discussed, along with an
on-site inspection of the existing space. The modifications as proposed will
be reviewed to cut down on the amount of revisions. Based on the revisions,
the staff was authorized to proceed with procuring the modifications pending
one last review of the revised floor plan by Director Griffin.
(c) The Committee authorized staff to proceed with the procurement of a mobile
office complex for the Information Technology Department.
(d) The Committee authorized staff to proceed with the revisions for Finance and
Accounting as discussed with the Committee.
(a) Space requirements for plant automation and discussion of the proposed
warehouse at Plant No. 2 will be discussed at the next Ad Hoc Meeting.
(7) OTHER BUSINESS. IF ANY
No other business was discussed.
(8) FUTURE MEETINGS
The next meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee will be held Wednesday, July 19, 1995,
following the Executive Committee Meeting.
(9) ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 6:05 p.m.
b (� P"u.
Gad Cain
Committee Secretary
JDL:gc
ADHOC95%071495.MIN
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County,California
P.O.Box 8127.108"Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley,CA 92728.8127
Telephone: (714)962-2411
DRAFT
MINUTES OF AD HOC COMMITTEE
MEETING
Thursday, September 13, 1995, at 7:30 p.m.
A meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee of
the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13, and 14 of Orange County,
California was held on Wednesday, August 2, 1995, at the Districts' Administrative Office.
(1) ROLLCALL
Those present were as follows:
AD HOC COMMITTEE: STAFF PRESENT:
John Collins, PDC Come. Chair Blake Anderson, Assistant General
Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair Manager
Don Griffin, Past Joint Chair Judith Wilson, Assistant General
Manager
David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Gary Hasenstab, Director of Human
Resources
Paul Mitchell, Engineering Supervisor
Terri Josway, Safety/Emergency
Response Manager
(2) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments received.
(3) APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of the September 7, 1995 Ad Hoc Committee were approved as written.
(4) REPORTS OF COMMITTEE CHAIR GENERAL MANAGER AND DIRECTOR OF
ENGINEERING
There were no reports.
(5) NEW AND MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS
None to report.
Minutes of Ad Hoc Committee Meeting
Page 2
September 13, 1995
(6) OLD BUSINESS
(a) Discussion of Proposed Warehouse Modifications at Plant No. 2.
Proposed modifications to the existing warehouse were discussed. David
Ludwin indicated that a seismic evaluation will be made on the structure in the
near term to determine the feasibility of modifying the building. In addition, a
more accurate estimate of costs for the upgrades needed will be prepared for
discussion at the November 2, 1995 Ad Hoc Committee Meeting.
(b) Discussion of Proposed Scope of Work for Space Utilization Study for
Administrative Personnel.
The proposed Scope of Work was discussed and final comments were received
from the Committee.
(c) Discussion of Additional Information Provided for Proposed Changes to
Safety and Emergency Response Division Office Space.
Terri Josway gave a briefing on the confidential nature of the work done by the
Safety and Emergency Response Staff. After discussion, a modified plan to
provide office space was approved by the Committee.
(7) OTHER BUSINESS. IF ANY
No other business was discussed.
(8) FUTURE MEETINGS
The next meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee will be held on Thursday, October 19,
1995, at 5:30 p.m. to discuss the staff evaluation of the Space Utilization Study
proposals and recommendations for consultant interviews.
(9) ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 8:00 p.m.
Gall Cain
Committee Secretary
DAL:gc
J%WPDOCWDHOC9MEPTW1395.MIN
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County,California
P.O.Box 8127•10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127
Telephone: (714) 962-2411
DRAFT
MINUTES OF AD HOC COMMITTEE
MEETING
Thursday, September 13, 1995, at 7:30 o.m.
A meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee of
the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13, and 14 of Orange County,
California was held on Wednesday, August 2, 1995, at the Districts' Administrative Office.
(1) ROLL CALL
Those present were as follows:
AD HOC COMMITTEE: STAFF PRESENT:
John Collins, PDC Come. Chair Blake Anderson, Assistant General
Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair Manager
Don Griffin, Past Joint Chair Judith Wilson, Assistant General
Manager
David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Gary Hasenstab, Director of Human
Resources
Paul Mitchell, Engineering Supervisor
Terri Josway, Safety/Emergency
Response Manager
(2) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments received.
(3) APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of the September 7, 1995 Ad Hoc Committee were approved as written.
(4) REPORTS OF COMMITTEE CHAIR GENERAL MANAGER. AND DIRECTOR OF
ENGINEERING
There were no reports.
(5) NEW AND MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS
None to report.
Minutes of Ad Hoc Committee Meeting
Page 2
September 13, 1995
(6) OLD BUSINESS
(a) Discussion of Proposed Warehouse Modifications at Plant No. 2.
Proposed modifications to the existing warehouse were discussed. David
Ludwin indicated that a seismic evaluation will be made on the structure in the
near tens to determine the feasibility of modifying the building. In addition, a
more accurate estimate of costs for the upgrades needed will be prepared for
discussion at the November 2, 1995 Ad Hoc Committee Meeting.
(b) Discussion of Proposed Scope of Work for Space Utilization Study for
Administrative Personnel.
The proposed Scope of Work was discussed and final comments were received
from the Committee.
(c) Discussion of Additional Information Provided for Proposed Changes to
Safety and Emergency Response Division Office Space.
Terri Josway gave a briefing on the confidential nature of the work done by the
Safety and Emergency Response Staff. After discussion, a modified plan to
provide office space was approved by the Committee.
(7) OTHER BUSINESS, IF ANY
No other business was discussed.
(8) FUTURE MEETINGS
The next meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee will be held on Thursday, October 19,
1995, at 5:30 p.m. to discuss the staff evaluation of the Space Utilization Study
proposals and recommendations for consultant interviews.
(9) ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 8:00 p.m.
r
.w
a I Cain
Committee Secretary
DAL:gc
J9WPDOCWDHOC9 EPTD91395MN
County Sanitation Districts
+� of Orange County,California
P.O. Box 8127 • 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127
Telephone: (714) 962-2411
DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE
September 27, 1995 -5:30 p.m.
A meeting of the Steering Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held Wednesday, September 27,
1995, at 5:30 p.m., at the Districts' Administrative office.
(1) ROLL CALL
The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
STEERING COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT:
Present: Terry Andrus, Counsel
John C. Cox, Jr., Joint Chair
Peer A. Swan, Vice Joint Chair STAFF PRESENT:
George Brown, Chair, FAHR
John J. Collins, Chair, PDC Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager
Pat McGuigan, Chair, OMITS Blake P. Anderson, Assistant General Manager
Judith A. Wilson, Assistant General Manager
Jean Tappan, Secretary
Absent:
Roger Stanton, Vice Chair, FAHR
(2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no comments by any member of the public.
.q
Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting
Page 2
September 27, 1995
(4) APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of the August 23, 1995 Steering Committee meeting were approved
as drafted.
(5) REPORTS OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR, GENERAL MANAGER AND
GENERAL COUNSEL
(a) There was no report by the Committee Chairman.
(b) The General Manager added two information items for discussion to the
agenda, the use of Merrill Lynch by PIMCO for investment and an update
on the consolidation effort.
PIMCO's Use of Multiple Brokerage Firms
Judy Wilson reported that the PIMCO monitoring reports indicate that
Merrill Lynch is one of the brokerage firms they are placing orders with; of
the 64 orders placed so far, 12 have been with Merrill Lynch. PIMCO was
contacted about the potential conflict and they indicated that they would
prefer to continue to use Merrill Lynch as they often are the best purveyor,
but would honor our directions. PIMCO indicated that not using Merrill
Lynch would affect the yield.
Blake Anderson raised the question at the OCIP meeting this morning. As
long as we maintain the customer status with PIMCO and we are in a
secondary position, no further action needs to be taken on this issue.
Update on Consolidation Effort
Staff and General Counsel met with LAFCO's new Executive Officer Dana
Smith, who has experience in special districts consolidations. LAFCO will
be giving us a punch list of what will be required, including detailed financial
analyses, budgets for the past three years, future estimated costs and
underlying debt, analysis on user fees, and impacts on the users. Full
disclosure will be required. If all nine districts support the consolidation,
they will have to go forward; if not, the Executive Officer asked that we
consider consolidating eight districts and contracting with IRWD for
District 14 as we do with SAWPA. One consideration of the consolidation
will be the redistribution of property taxes.
Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting
Page 3
September 27, 1995
If possible, a general election is to be avoided. If all nine districts adopt
resolutions, there would be no problem and no election would be required.
With less than nine districts, LAFCO could order consolidation election, or
impose an all-or-nothing plan.
Counsel will check to see if there may be a conflict of interest by the
Districts' Board members who serve on LAFCO.
Ms. Smith suggested that as the process becomes more intense, we may
want to hire a consultant to assist us. She estimated that three to four
months will be required to put everything together to submit to LAFCO and
another four months after the application is received for review and action.
Director Swan asked about the impacts on District 14. They will be
addressed in the financial analyses.
The governing board of the resulting district will be made up of one
representative per city, district and county.
Judy discussed the next steps in the process and will continue to update
the Directors as events unfold. This item will be presented to the Executive
Committee in October. Staff was directed to review the Dana Point
Sanitary Districts consolidation report for information.
(c) There was no report by Counsel.
(6) REPORT ON EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT RETREAT
The Executive Management Team retreat was held on August 24 and 25, with
David Jones facilitating. One of the major results was the need for serious
discussion with the Boards on moving ahead with the strategic planning effort.
The need for forming several volunteer employee committees was determined
and, as a result, a Training Advisory Group and a Core Values Committee have
been established. When the Communications Director is on board, a
Communications Committee will also be formed. The Training Advisory Group
will be assessing training needs throughout the plants and how to implement the
needed training within the budget. The Core Values Committee will determine
"rules of the road", or how staff deals with one another.
Q
Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting
Page 4
September 27, 1995
The General Manager's role in the organization was also discussed, and he will
be the link between the Boards and the organization, help to change the culture of
the organization towards a more collegial atmosphere; and turn over the day-to-
day operations to the two Assistant General Managers.
Department priorities were determined, and goals are now being developed by
each department. The team also set criteria for measuring success. A complete
goals statement for all departments will be available next month, and there will be
work plans for each division within the department. These will be presented at the
October meeting of the Steering Committee.
(7) DISCUSSION OF STRATEGIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION
After the retreat, the need to move more quickly on developing a new strategic
plan became apparent. A lot of decisions are being delayed as a result and we
may be spending money on things that are not necessary. Among those things
that need to be addressed are:
• Considering opening up the NPDES permit process.
• The impact on our operations as a result of EPA's decision on San Diego.
• Reduction in flow.
• Commitment to reclamation.
Blake Anderson indicated that there are a lot of external issues that are affecting
the Districts, including what can be done to manage our future flows to delay or
even eliminate the need for additional facilities. Additional staff time is being
assigned to three projects: Project 1 is the repair of the existing outfall; Project 2
is management of the peak hydraulic discharge; and Project 3 is review of the
annual and capital financial charges. Chair Cox asked that asset management be
added to consider how we use and new uses for our electricity, natural gas,
biosolids, and excess land. Other things being considered are updating the
master plan, staff and training support facilities, finance requirements, sewer
control and pollution prevention, operations and maintenance requirements, and
programmatic requirements. Staff was directed to consider conservation and flow
control .
Project X, the public participation effort, will be necessary when EPA considers
our permit application.
Staff was directed to make this same presentation at the next Executive
Committee meeting and to provide the flip chart strategic planning information in
handout form.
Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting
Page 5
September27, 1995
(8) DISCUSSION OF POLICY IMPLICATIONS OF PROPOSED COMPRESSED
NATURAL GAS FUELING STATION
After discussion, it was determined that this project is considered a part of asset
management and staff was directed to continue its efforts.
(9) REPORT ON PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS OF EXECUTIVE
MANAGEMENTPERSONNEL
The General Manager reported on the results of the Department Heads
evaluations and resulting salary changes. The Steering Committee concurred
and indicated that it was within the General Manager's charge to review and
approve the evaluations of staff.
At this time, the General Manager is not authorized to make merit increases at the
end of probationary periods, only at the end of the fiscal year, and this change
was requested to bring Blake Anderson into line with Judy Wilson's salary. This
can be simplified by adoption of Res. 95-54 in October.
The Steering Committee members indicated that a benchmarking study of key
personnel positions be undertaken, comparing similar positions in both the public
and private sectors. Judy Wilson will direct Human Resources to track this.
(10) PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF GENERAL MANAGER
After discussion, it was decided that the General Manager is to prepare more
specific goals addressing direct lines of responsibility and ensuring better reports
to Committees. The Steering Committee and the General Manager will determine
a set of measurable goals for the annual performance evaluation at the next
meeting.
(11) CLOSED SESSION
There was no closed session.
4
Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting
Page 6
September 27, 1995
(12) OTHER BUSINESS
Director Swan asked about the status of the deferred compensation issue. This will be
presented to the FAHR and Executive Committees and the Joint Boards in October.
(13) MATTERS TO BE REPORTED AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING
There were no matters to be reported.
(14) MATTERS ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT
There were no matters for a future agenda.
(15) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS
The next meeting will be at the call of the Joint Chair.
(16) ADJOURNMENT
The Steering Committee adjourned at approximately 7:25 p.m.
Submitted by:
Jean Tappan, Steering Committee Secretary
J1W GOCLGNS]PLOMMOd]]BS.NIY
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County,California
vy P.O. Box 8127. 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127
Telephone: (714(962-2411
DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND
TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE
WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 4. 1995 -5:30 PM
A meeting of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee of the County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on
October 4, 1995, at 5:30 P.M. at the Districts'Administrative offices.
(1) ROLL CALL
The roll was called and a quorum declared present as follows:
Committee Directors Present: Staff Present:
Pal McGuigan, Chair Don McIntyre, General Manager
Peer Swan,Vice Joint Chair Judy Wilson, Chief Administrative Officer
Barry Denes Gary Hasenstab, Director of Human Resources
Norman Z. Eckenrode Ed Hodges, Director of Maintenance
James M. Ferryman Steve Hovey, Director of Information Technology
Julie Be David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Sal Sapien Bob Ooten, Director of Operations
Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Nancy Wheatley, Director of Technical Services
Laurie Bluestein, Laboratory Manager
Irwin Haydock, Scientist
Terri Josway, Safety
Mike Moore,Technical Services
George Robertson, Environmental Management
Michael Rozengurt, Environmental Management
Ed Torres, Environmental Management
Dan Tunnicliff, Safety
Michele Farmer, Environmental Management
Committee Directors Absent:
John C. Cox, Jr., Joint Chair
Victor Leipzig,Vice Chair
Mark Murphy
(2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIRMAN PRO TEM, IF NECESSARY
No appointment was necessary.
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no comments from the public.
Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance
and Technical Services Committee Meeting
Page 2 of 4
October 4, 1995
(4) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR, GENERAL MANAGER, ASSISTANT
GENERAL MANAGER OF OPERATIONS, DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS.
DIRECTOR OF MAINTENANCE AND DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES
(a) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
Director Pat McGuigan extended a warm welcome on behalf of the Committee
to David Ludwin, the new Director of Engineering, and to the other members of
staff who are not usually present.
(b) REPORT OF GENERAL MANAGER
Don McIntyre spoke of the need to move forward on the Districts' Strategic Plan
of Action for the Districts. He noted that the presentation by Irwin Haydock on
the Ocean Monitoring Program at tonight's meeting moves us forward in the
direction of a Strategic Plan for Ocean Monitoring.
(c) REPORT OF ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER OF OPERATIONS
Blake Anderson was unable to be present at the meeting.
(d) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS
Bob Ooten reported on the closing of BKK Landfill and noted that it has a
possibility of impacting our grit and screenings hauling contract.
(e) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF MAINTENANCE
Ed Hodges reported on the following:
1. The state of the "bone yard" at Plant No. 2. We are getting bids for
removal of the engines that are still there on the 17th of this month.
2. The surge tower and the problems involved in trying to paint it. He will
report any progress at the next meeting.
3. The benchmarking study being done by the Collections Division. There
is a possibility the Districts will be asking for help from the member
cities.
(f) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES
Nancy Wheatley reported that the new Laboratory Manager, Dr. Samuel
Mobray, will begin work at the Districts on October 23, 1995.
(5) APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 6, 1995
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held
on September 6, 1995, it was moved, seconded and carried that said minutes be
deemed approved as mailed.
Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance
a. and Technical Services Committee Meeting
Page 3 of 4
October 4, 1995
(6) OLD BUSINESS
OMTS95-019: Review of Ernst and Young Recommendation for a North
County Yard
Ed Hodges gave an update of staffs findings of the property located on Harbor
Boulevard in Anaheim. The Committee requested that staff contact the members of
the Joints Boards from Anaheim and ask for their input on this subject.
It was moved, seconded and carried to authorize staff to take this item through the
Executive Committee to the Joint Boards, with the full appraisal added, for
authorization to bid on the property at the County auction to be held on October 27,
1995.
OMTS95-021: Quarterly Report on the Districts' Occupational Injury and Near
Miss Accident Rates
Terri Josway gave the 1995 Third Quarter report. It was decided that future reports
will include vehicle accident data. It was also decided that future reports will be given
a month later to allow for the data to be compiled and sent out with the Committee
agenda packages.
(7) NEW BUSINESS
OMTS95-043: Consideration of motion to receive and file OMTS Committee
certification for Professional Services to develop an Integrated
Emergency Response Plan and award a contract to
Communications Performance Group, Inc. for a cost not to
exceed $125,000 for the 1995-96 Fiscal Year and a total cost of
$312,232.
Dan Tunnicliff gave a detailed report on the merits of awarding the contract to
Communications Performance Group, Inc.
After some discussion, it was moved, seconded and carried to approve staffs
recommendation. The Committee requested milestone reports for the duration of the
Contract.
OMTS95.044: Districts' 301(h) Ocean Monitoring Program (OMP)and OMP
Scientists' Workshop.
Nancy Wheatley introduced the members of her staff who have worked on the Ocean
Monitoring Program then Irwin Haycock gave an informative presentation on Ocean
Monitoring after which a discussion ensued.
OMTS95-045: Consideration of motion authorizing an increase in the
expenditures for the Districts' in-house analyses supporting
the Joint Ultraviolet Pilot Project between Orange County Water
District and the Districts from $40,000 to $57,000 in direct labor
and material costs. The original expenditures of $40,000 were
authorized in April 1993. Refer to April 14, 1993 Board Item
(13)(b)(2).
Laurie Bluestein gave a short presentation and, without discussion, it was moved,
seconded and carried to approve staffs recommendation.
Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance
and Technical Services Committee Meeting
Page 4 of 4
October 4, 1995
(8) CLOSED SESSION
The Chair declared there were no items for closed session.
(9) OTHER BUSINESS, IF ANY
1. Staff was given kudos by the Directors for Family Day.
2. Staff will be setting up another tour of Plant No. 2. There will be a Board Letter
item in the October Joint Board agenda package.
3. Directors wishing to take a boat tour on the Crusader on October 17 should
contact Clarice Marcin at (714) 962-2411, extension 3001.
(10) MATTERS ON WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT AT A
SUBSEQUENT MEETING
None.
(11) MATTERS A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR
ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT
None.
(12) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING DATES AND ITEMS TO BE
DISCUSSED AT THOSE MEETINGS
None.
(13) ADJOURNMENT
The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:45 P.M.
Glance M. Marcin
Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services
Committee Secretary
R:%WPDOCWO\ERIOMTSWINUTES M%10.
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County,California
v P.O. Box 8127•10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127
Telephone: (714) 962-2411
DRAFT
MINUTES OF PLANNING, DESIGN AND
CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE
THURSDAY. OCTOBER 5. 1995 at 5:30 p.m.
A regular meeting of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee of the County Sanitation
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13, and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Thursday,
September 7, 1995, at the Districts'Administrative Office.
(1) ROLL CALL
The roll was taken and a quorum declared present, as follows:
Planning, Design and
Construction Committee: Staff Present:
Present: Don McIntyre, General Manager
Blake Anderson, Assistant General
John Collins, Chair Manager
Shirley Dettloff David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Don Griffin Steve Hovey, Director of Info. Technology
Barry Hammond Ed Hodges, Director of Maintenance
Margie Rice Bob Ooten, Director of Operations
Sheldon Singer, Vice Chair Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair John Linder, Construction Manager
Charles Sylvia
Bob Zemel
Absent: Others Present:
John Cox Mary Lee, John Carollo Engineers
d
Minutes of Planning, Design and
Construction Committee Meeting
Page 2
October 5, 1995
(2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments received.
(4) APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 7. 1995 MEETING
The minutes of the September 7, 1995 Planning, Design and Construction Committee
Meeting were approved as written.
(5) REPORTS OF COMMITTEE CHAIR GENERAL MANAGER, ASSISTANT GENERAL
MANAGER, DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING. AND GENERAL COUNSEL
(a) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
No report was given.
(b) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
The General Manager stated we were moving forward to update the 20/20 Plan.
The Assistant General had previously given a fairly comprehensive presentation
on the need for that update. All Committees will be presented with a time line
that will include a quarterly, half-day workshop on Saturdays to discuss the
important policy decisions needed. It is approximately an 18-month process.
(c) REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER
The Assistant General Manager reported that there is still no resolution to the
bankruptcy. All differences have not been reconciled between the Sacramento
Legislation and the agreement that was signed last month. Also discussed was
our application for a waiver from a full secondary treatment that was submitted in
1989 and our existing permit.
(d) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING
No report was given.
(e) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
No report was given.
Minutes of Planning, Design and
Construction Committee Meeting
Page 3
October 5, 1995
(6) STAFF OVERVIEW OF DISTRICTS' PLANNING. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION
ACTIVITIES
(a) Status Report on Jobs within the Plants and the Districts by the Director of
Engineering
The Director of Engineering reported on projects that are on-going in the plants.
P1-36-2, the Secondary Expansion at Plant No. 1, is a new project. The Notice to
Proceed was issued to Margate Construction on September 18, 1995. This is a
project that will be carried out under a Partnering Agreement with the Districts,
the contractor, and the engineer.
The Space Utilization Study is currently underway. The Scope of Work was
finalized in September with the Ad Hoc Committee and sent out to five
prequalified firms. Five proposals have been received which are curren8y under
review. The staff will be reviewing the proposals and presenting
recommendations to the Ad Hoc Committee in approximately two weeks.
Interviews will be set up on November 2, 1995 with the firths that are best
qualified. The results of those interviews will be reported to the PDC Committee
November 2, 1995. The Professional Services Contract will be awarded at the
Board of Directors' Meeting on November 15, 1995.
The evaluation of the Plant No. 2 Warehouse has been under discussion by this
Committee and the Ad Hoc Committee. A seismic evaluation of the building is
currently being conducted to determine what structural modifications would be
needed. In addition, costs are being updated for necessary modifications to the
building to make it inhabitable as a long-term warehouse facility. Those costs will
be presented to this Committee at the November 2, 1995 PDC Committee
Meeting.
(b) Justification of the Need for the Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2
At the last PDC Committee Meeting, the Maintenance building at Plant No. 2 was
discussed and staff was asked to come back with an assessment of that project.
Ed Hodges gave a brief analysis as to the need for a Maintenance building at
Plant No. 2. Ernst 8 Young recognized the need for a Maintenance building and,
in fact, it was one of their recommendations in their audit of the Operations and
Maintenance Department, rating it as a "high priority." Ed provided a slide
presentation showing the office and shop areas, as well as shower, locker, and
lunch room facilities. After the slide presentation, there was discussion regarding
the need for the Maintenance Building and questions regarding square footage
and costs. After the discussion. It was moved, seconded, and carried to approve
this item.
(7) OLD BUSINESS
None to report.
9
Minutes of Planning, Design and
Construction Committee Meeting
Page 4
October 5, 1995
(8) ACTIONS RE PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTS
(a) Quarterly Change Order Report by Director of Engineering on Change
Orders approved by the General Manager, Planning, Design and
Construction Committee, and Joint Boards, in accordance with Resolution
No. 95-9.
A revised packet was distributed which contained the revised spreadsheet of the
Quarterly Change Order Report. The Construction Manager, on behalf of the
Director of Engineering, reported on the Quarterly Change Order Report. He
discussed the three new Change Orders listed on the report. The Change Orders
were presented for information only as they were previously approved by the
General Manager.
(b) Action items:
PDC95-29: Consideration of Motion Accepting Rehabilitation of Cypress
Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-R7 as Complete,
and Authorizing Execution of the Notice of Completion and
Approving the Final Closeout Agreement.
The Construction Manager explained that this is a District 2 item that the PDC
Committee is reviewing for that District. This particular item was started one year
ago last June and the contract has been complete for several weeks. This is
being brought forth for final Closeout action to the Joint Boards. It was moved,
seconded, and carded to recommend approval of this item.
PDC95-30: Consideration of the Following Actions Relative to the Plans
and Specifications for Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview
Road to Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-1A, Increasing the
Amount of Change Orders on this Contract to $508,315.81,
Increasing the Original Contract Amount from $8,278,963.00 to
$8,787,298.81.
(1) Consideration of Motion Approving Change Order No. 3
to the Plans and Specifications for Said Project
Authorizing a Net Addition of$39,734.90 to the Contract
with Mladen Buntich Construction Company, Inc. for
Six Items of Added Work, and Granting a Time
Extension of 33 Calendar Days.
(2) Consideration of Motion Approving Change Order No. 4
to the Plans and Specifications for Said Project
Authorizing a Net Addition of$209,090.78 to the
Contract with Mladen Buntich Construction Company,
Inc.for Nine Items of Added Work, and Granting a Time
Extension of 39 Calendar Days.
Minutes of Planning, Design and
r Construction Committee Meeting
Page 5
October 5, 1995
(3) Consideration of Motion Approving Change Order No. 5
to the Plans and Specifications for Said Project
Authorizing a Net Addition of$12,642.00 to the Contract
with Mladen Suntich Construction Company, Inc. for an
Adjustment of Engineer's Quantities.
(4) Consideration of Resolution No. 95-_, Accepting the
Said Contract as Complete, Authorizing Execution of
the Notice of Completion and Approving the Final
Closeout Agreement.
After some discussion, it was moved, seconded, and carried to recommend
approval of this item. Staff was directed to be more specific if there are any
liquidated damages or any incentive provisions involved in approving time
extensions.
(9) ADDENDA TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS
None to report
(10) NEW PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS
None to report.
(11) CONSIDERATION OF NEW AND MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS
PDC95-31: Approval of the Partnering Charter and the Value Engineering Clause
for Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No.
P1-36-2.
The Director of Engineering gave an overhead presentation outlining the concept of
partnering and its benefits and cost-effectiveness. Partnering was described as an
informal agreement to establish a clear understanding and the sharing of mutual goals.
On September 11, 1995, there was a formal partnering session during which staff from
the Districts, the contractor and its subcontractors, and the consultant, John Carollo
Engineers, established a series of partnership goals. The concept of value engineering
was discussed and its incentive to the contractor to suggest methods more economical
and share in any resulting savings. Motion was made for a recommendation to accept
and approve the Partnering Charter and the Value Engineering Clause to this contract.
After a question and answer session, it was moved, seconded, and carried to approve
this item.
(12) CLOSED SESSION
The Chair determined that there was no need for a closed session.
0
Minutes of Planning, Design and
Construction Committee Meeting
Page 6
October 5, 1995
(13) OTHER BUSINESS. IF ANY
None.
(14) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A
SUBSEQUENT MEETING
A request was made for an update on what was happening at the Microbiology Lab.
A request was made to have the next PDC Committee Meeting held at Plant No. 2 in
order to actually see things that have been discussed in the meetings at an earlier time.
It was decided we would meet in the Administration Building at Plant No. 2 at 5:00 p.m.,
with a tour first and then dinner.
(15) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA
FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT
There were no matters discussed.
(16) NEXT MEETING
(a) Executive Committee Meeting -Wednesday, October 18, 1995, at
5:30 p.m.
(b) Ad Hoc Committee Meeting-Thursday, October 19, 1995, at 5:30 p.m.
(c) Joint Boards of Directors Meeting -Wednesday, October 25, 1995, at 7:30 p.m.
(d) Planning, Design and Construction Committee Meeting -Thursday, November 2,
1995, at 5:00 p.m. at Plant No. 2 Administration Building (In Huntington Beach on
Brookhurst between Hamilton and Pacific Coast Highway).
(17) OTHER ANNOUNCEMENTS, IF ANY
None.
(18) ADJOURNMENT
The Chair declared the meeting adjoumed at 7:00 p.m.
V, 4� e�
Gail A. Cain
Planning, Design and Construction
Committee Secretary
I�VGOODPD�W Cp1 bEBS.MY
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County,California
P.O. Box 8127. 108"Ellis Avenue
y Fountain Valley,CA 92728-0127
Telephone: (714)962-2411
DRAFT
MINUTES OF FINANCE,
ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE
Wednesday. October 11, 1995, 5:30 P.M.
A meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee of the
County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County,
California was held on October 11, 1995 at 5:30 p.m., at the Districts' Administrative
Offices.
(1) ROLL CALL
The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
Committee Directors Present: Staff Present:
George Brown, Chairman Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager
Jan Debay Judith A. Wilson, Assistant General Manager
James Flora Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance
John M. Gullixson Ed Hodges, Director of Maintenance
Wally Linn Bob Ooten, Director of Operations
Thomas Saltarelli Gary Hasenstab, Director of Human Resources
Peer Swan Steven J. Hovey, Director of Information Tech.
Michael D. White, Controller
Stephen V. Kozak, Financial Manager
Committee Directors Absent
John C. Cox, Jr., Joint Chairman Others Present:
Burnie Dunlap
Roger R. Stanton, Vice Chairman Terry Andrus, General Counsel
William G. Steiner
(2) APPOINTMENT OF A CHAIRMAN PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
No comments were made.
Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee
Page 2
October 11, 1995
(4) REPORTS OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR, GENERAL MANAGER, ASSISTANT
GENERAL MANAGER(S). DIRECTOR OF FINANCE/TREASURER,
DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES, DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION
TECHNOLOGY AND GENERAL COUNSEL
(a) Report of the Committee Chair
The Chairman had no report.
(b) Report of the General Manager
The General Manager, Donald F. McIntyre, reported that he was
becoming concerned about recent policy papers from taxpayer
associations regarding user fees, asserting that the fees are taxes if they
are mandatory and not discretionary. User fees for waste water treatment
could be challenged under this theory.
(c) Report of Assistant General Manager- Operations
No report.
Report of Assistant General Manager - Administration
Judy Wilson had no report.
(d) Report of the Director of Finance/Treasurer
(1) Finance Directorrrreasurer Gary Streed updated the Committee on
the status of the Districts' COP program, and the performance of
remarketing agents PaineWebber and J.P. Morgan. Mr. Streed
noted that the variable rates rose slightly at the end of September
due to historical quarter-end fluctuations. The rates declined to
prior levels at the beginning of October.
Staff will continue to keep the Committee fully informed about
developments in the program as they occur each month.
(2) Pacific Investment Management Company, "PIMCO," the Districts'
Investment Manager, and Mellon Trust Company, Custodial Bank,
both signed their final contracts on September 6, 1995, in time for
the U.S. Treasury Bill maturity on September 7. Mr. Streed advised
that $233.1 million was placed in the long-term portfolio and $60
million went into the short-term portfolio. September was,
therefore, a transitional or structuring month. The first PIMCO
report was discussed as item FAHR 95-41.
Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee
Page 3
ti
October 11, 1995
(e) Report of the Director of Human Resources
Gary Hasenslab had no report-
(f) Report of the Director of Information Technology
The Director of Information Technology, Steve Hovey, had no report.
(g) Report of General Counsel
Terry Andrus had no report.
(5) APPROVAL OF MINUTES
It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the draft minutes of the
October 11, 1995, meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources
Committee.
(6) Consideration of OMTS95-041 -Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) Refueling
Station
Ed Hodges, Director of Maintenance, gave a brief presentation detailing the costs
associated with the operation of a Compressed Natural Gas refueling station.
After discussion on this item, it was moved, seconded and duly carried to
recommend the Executive Committee approve the Compressed Natural Gas
(CNG) Refueling Station project; authorize staff to loan reserve funds to build the
station; and create an enterprise account for this project. The staff was
requested to report on the results at least annually.
(7) OLD BUSINESS
FPC95- 3 Consideration of motion to approve reimbursement of
participants' deferred compensation contributions.
Assistant General Manager Judy Wilson reviewed the history of the Districts'
deferred compensation plan and the funds that were held at the Orange County
Treasury from 1975 until 1995. She noted that these funds were included in the
OCIP failure. In January 1995, the County Board of Supervisors established
pay-out limits for all participants in the OCIP. County employees were given a
90% payout of their deferred compensation balances; however, the Districts'
deferred compensation participants were only given an 80% pay-out, treating
them the same as the balance of the OCIP investors. $933,335.96 is still
outstanding for the Districts' deferred compensation participants. The CSDOC
group was the only non-County group of participants whose deferred
Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee
Page 4
October 11, 1995
D
compensation plan was administered and segregated at the County at the time of
the bankruptcy.
After discussion on this matter, is it was moved, seconded and duly carried to
recommend approval to the Executive Committee of the following three-point
resolution:
A. Deposit $311,119 of the loss for the next three years with Lincoln National
Insurance Plan.
B. Do not provide an "interest earnings" adjustment.
C. Distributions from the Bankruptcy Court on behalf of the Deferred
Compensation Plan will reimburse the Districts, to the extent that they are
available.
Director Gullixson opposed the motion.
FAHR95-25 Consideration of motion to approve revision of Resolution
No. 95-54 Pertaining to Classification. Compensation, and
Other Terms. Conditions. Rules and Regulations of
Employment.
Resolution No. 95-54 was adopted by the Boards on May 24, 1995. Gary
Hasenstab, Director of Human Resources, advised that staff and General
Counsel have reviewed Resolution No. 95-54 and are proposing amendments to
reflect staffing changes in the 1995-96 approved budget, changes in legislation
and labor practice, and policy statements which more accurately portray Districts'
managements' new direction.
After a brief discussion on this matter, it was moved, seconded and duly carried
to recommend adoption of Resolution No. 95-_on the basis that there are no
substantive changes in the level or cost of entitlements over previously adopted
resolutions, that liability insurance required of Executive Management will be
increased and a waiver provision be included to all the Districts to hire former
employees employed by outside firms within 12 months of their employment with
the Districts if it is in the best interest of the agency. The waiver would require
approval of the FAHR Committee.
(8) NEW BUSINESS
FAHR95-38 Consideration of motion approving authorization for staff
to solicit bids for Phase III and IV F.I.S. Consultant and
Acceptance of F.I.S. RFP prepared by Deloitte & Touche.
Mike White, Controller, advised that the Ernst & Young report of July 1995, on
the Finance Function Review, recommended a number of enhancements to the
RFP prepared by the consulting firm of Deloitle &Touche for the acquisition and
Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee
Page 5
October 11, 1995
4
installation of a new financial information system within the Districts' Finance
Department. Those enhancements included: Additional functionality
requirements in the area of Project Accounting and Cashiering; expanded
functionality in the Contracts Subsystem area; and functionality requirements for
the Human Resources application. The RFP for a new Financial Information
System (FIS) is now complete.
After discussion on this matter, it was moved, seconded and duly carried to
approve the following staff recommendations:
1. Direct staff to solicit bids for a professional consulting agreement for the
completion of Phase III, Selection Process for Hardware and Software,
and Phase IV, Implementation and Acceptance of the Selected Hardware
and Software Solutions for the Financial Information System project
2. Approve for release the Request For Proposal for a Financial Information
System. Distribution of the RFP will be made to appropriate vendors as
identified by the selected professional consulting firm hired to complete
Phases III and IV.
FAHR95-39 Consideration of motion to receive and file staff report
regarding monitoring of the Local Agency Investment Fund.
Steve Kozak, Financial Manager, in response to the Committee's request at their
September meeting, reported on the Districts' investments with the California
Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF). He reviewed LAIF's composition and
oversight committee structure, the current status of LAIF Investments; and the
reports available to the Districts for continual monitoring.
After discussion on this matter, it was moved, seconded and duly carried to
receive and file this report.
FAHR95-40 Consideration of motion to change the "Agreement for
Purchase and Sale of Capacity Rights in Treatment. Disposal
and Sewer Facilities" between County Sanitation District No.
14 and the other County Sanitation Districts of Orange
County.
Assistant General Manager Judy Wilson updated the Committee on the status of
the IRWD's Wetland Water Supply Project which proposes to divert a significant
portion of its flow to the duck ponds from October 21 through March 31. If the
Regional Water Quality Control Board approves the plan, the flow could be
diverted as early as January 1996. Removal of this flow from the CSD system
could have a significant impact on each of the Districts.
Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee
Page 6
October 11, 1995
D
After discussion on this matter, it was moved, seconded and duly carried to affirm
the Executive Committee's direction to negotiate a change to the 1986
"Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Capacity Rights in Treatment, Disposal
and Sewer Facilities," so that the District No. 14 annual flow is based upon the
actual average flow per day for the four highest months, in order to provide
capacity for higher winter months flows.
Directors Swan, Saltarelli and Debay abstained from the vote.
FAHR95-41 Consideration of motion to receive and file monthly
investment report and staff report regarding performance
monitoring of Pacific Investment Management Company.
Steve Kozak reported on the performance of Pacific Investment Management
Company. He advised that during the month of September, PIMCO completed
approximately 75 transactions, purchasing and selling securities to properly
structure the Districts' two investment portfolios in accordance with the Districts'
Investment Policy Statement. He advised monthly reports will be available from
PIMCO to the Districts after the fifth business day following the end of the
preceding month. Monthly bank statements from Mellon Trust, detailing portfolio
transactions and account balances, will also be available to the Districts. The
Districts' Investment Advisor, Callan Associates will prepare and present to the
Committee Quarterly Performance Reports.
After discussion on this matter, it was moved, seconded and duly carried to
receive and file this report.
FAHR95-42 Consideration of motion to approve staff recommendations
re microcomputer acquisition issues (Specification
No. E-2611.
Steve Hovey, Director of Information Technology, gave an overview of the
microcomputer acquisition issues. At the July 6, 1995 meeting of the Planning,
Design and Construction Committee, item PDC95-24 "Discussion of Plant
Automation Computer System and Consideration of Motion Authorizing Staff to
Issue Purchase Order with Pioneer-Standard Electronics for Two VAX 4000
Model 705A Computers for Plant 2 Plant Automation", was presented to the
Committee. This proposal included the purchase of 32 DEC Pentium Personal
Computers for Operations at both plants. The Committee authorized staff to
proceed with the purchase of the Two VAX 4000 Computers for Plant 2
automation, but the purchase of the Personal Computers was deferred pending a
staff evaluation to identify more cast effective options.
After discussion on this item, it was moved, seconded and duly carried to
approve the following actions:
Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee
Page 7
October 11, 1995
1. Recommend to the Joint Board that the Districts' policy with regards to
standards for PC technology shall be that all PC technology purchases be
limited to the most recent list of Tier 1 and Tier 2 vendors as defined by
GartnerGroup, for both desktop computers and mobile computers.
2. Recommend to the Joint Boards that the Districts policy state that, with
regards to the purchase of PC technology all purchasing actions utilize
California Multiple Award Schedule (CMAS) contracts for the purchase of
PC technology from among the list of Tier 1 and Tier 2 vendors as
mentioned in the previous motion. Staff will compare CMAS pricing and
choose the lowest priced Tier 1 and Tier 2 vendor's configuration
applicable to the Districts' needs.
3. Recommend consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a purchase
order to Dell Computer, the lowest priced Gartner Tier 112 vendor at this
time, in a total amount not to exceed $208,900.00, including sales tax, for
the Purchase of 60 Personal Computers and monitors and other
associated components (Specification No. E-261).
4. Direct staff to issue an RFP for Hardware Maintenance Services and an
RFP for Software Help Desk Services. Staff will evaluate proposals, rank
and present their recommendations to the Committee for award of a
Purchase Order for such services in an amount estimated not to exceed
$150,000.
FAHR9543 Consideration of motion to approve staff recommendation
for the establishment of a Relief Operator bonus of$.60 per
hour for employees covered by the Operations and
Maintenance Memorandum of Understanding through a Side
Letter Agreement in order to reduce overtime costs.
Gary Hasenstab, Director of Human Resources, advised the Committee that the
annual overtime cost to operate both treatment plants is currently about
$375,000. Forty-eight percent (48%) of this total, or$180,000, is attributable to
holiday coverage and is currently controlled by operating at minimum staffing
levels on holidays. The remaining fifty-two percent (52%), or$195,000, is
caused by employees working overtime to cover for the scheduled or
unscheduled absences of other employees in an effort to meet minimum staffing
requirements. Overtime costs could be further reduced through use of a relief, or
floater, position that could be assigned to any vacant shift on a regular basis. A
Relief Operator bonus offers an inducement to work this otherwise undesirable
and unpredictable shift, which may vary from mornings one week to nights the
following week. Eight such positions at both plants have the potential of reducing
overtime costs by up to $100,000 annually.
Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee
Page 8
October 11, 1995
P
After discussion on this item, it was moved, seconded and duly carried to
recommend the Executive Committee approve staffs recommendation to
establish a Relief Operator bonus of$0.60 per hour for employees covered by
the Operations and Maintenance Memorandum of Understanding through a Side
Letter of Agreement.
(9) CLOSED SESSION
There was no closed session required.
(10) OTHER BUSINESS, IF ANY
None.
(11) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A
SUBSEQUENT MEETING
No reports were requested.
(12) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE
AGENDA FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT
None.
(13) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING DATES AND ITEMS TO BE
DISCUSSED AT THOSE MEETINGS
The next Committee meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, November 8, 1995.
(14) ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 7:40 p.m.
GGS:lc
J:\WPDOCIFIN\CRANBFPC,MTGIFAHR.95 P61 AHR.MINWFAHR10.95
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County,California
b P.O.Box 8127 a 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127
Telephone: (714) 962-2411
DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE AD HOC COMMITTEE
RE LANDFILL ISSUES
Wednesday, October 18, 1995 at 4 p.m.
A meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee re Landfill Issues of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2,
3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on October 18, 1995 at 4 p.m., at
the Districts'Administrative Office.
(1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
AD HOC COMMITTEE:
PRESENT: OTHERS PRESENT:
Joint Chair John C. Cox, Jr. Betty Mrgudich, Counsel
Director George Brown Chip Clements, Clements Environmental
Director John Collins Michael Ozawa, Paine Webber
Director Pat McGuigan Rebecca Casey, Saybrook Capital
Director Sheldon Singer John Schotz, Saybrook Capital
STAFF PRESENT:
BA SENT:
Don McIntyre, General Manager
Vice Joint Chair Peer Swan Blake Anderson, Chief Operations Officer
Director Don R. Griffin Judy Wilson, Chief Administrative Officer
Director John Gullixson Steve Kozak, Financial Manager
Director Sal Sapien Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary
Conna Chaudhry, Executive Assistant
(2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
(3) PUBLICCOMMENTS -
There were no comments by any member of the public.
Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee
Page 2
October 18, 1995
(4) APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee meeting re Landfill Issues held on August 18, 1995 were
approved as drafted.
(5) REPORTS OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR GENERAL MANAGER, AND GENERAL COUNSEL
The Committee Chair had no report.
The General Manager reported that staff was continuing the due diligence as directed by the
Boards. The information presented at this meeting will also be presented to the Joint Boards next
week. Staff will be requesting additional funds to continue the due diligence effort.
There was no report by General Counsel.
(6) DISCUSSION OF LANDFILL ISSUES.
Staff and our consultants presented a status report on the due diligence efforts to date. Attached
is a handout that details the items covered in the presentation.
Chip Clements presented a report on the regional perspective addressing the six-county area,
remote sites, both permitted and planned, and business considerations. Orange County is in an
enviable position in that there is capacity available for possibly 50 to 80 more years. When
comparing tipping fees with the other counties and remote sites, Orange County's are about
average. The future of landfills in Southern California was discussed and twenty years from now
Orange County could be the only large metropolitan county in the state with operating landfills.
The current landfill system in Orange County was reviewed. The three operating landfills are
operating at one-half capacity. An environmental audit was done on the operating landfills to
determine the liability status. On the whole, all of them were rated good and substantially in
compliance, with no great liability in evidence.
Steve Kozak reported on the existing MOUs between the County of Orange and the host cities.
Each contains similar elements including disposal limitations, road construction and maintenance,
visual screening requirements, operating hours, litter control. There are specific requirements in
each MOU as well. The possibility of using Measure M funds for the road construction was
discussed. Application for these funds could be made by the County of Orange on behalf of the
Landfill Operator.
Chip Clements addressed the liability status of the closed landfills. This is the major concem.
Pictures of the landfills have been taken and can be presented if requested. The results of Phase I
assessment of the 21 closed sites have shown that 11 of the 21 sites have low or very low liability
exposure, 4 sites have limited exposure, and 6 sites have high exposure. These are the ones that
have significant liability and will incur ongoing costs. Potential remedial actions include site
closure costs, postclosure maintenance costs, groundwater monitoringlremediation, gas
monitoring and control, and repair of ground settlement.
Betty Mrgudich reported on wastestream Flow control, discussing California Franchise agreements
and local control of the wastestream, the promise of a local waste stream (flow control), and legal
strengths and weaknesses.
Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee
Page 3
October 18, 1995
• Rebecca Casey reported on cash flow due diligence issues, including present and future capital
expenditures which could include huge variations, future tipping fee levels, closure/postclosure
reserves and operating costs.
Chip Clements described day-to-day operating costs, currently$21.75/ton (normalized to
$18.50/ton) for Orange County. With some changes, he estimated that $15/ton could be
achievable.
John Schotz discussed the term sheet, including the option to purchase and the need for a
confidentiality agreement with the County in order to obtain both hard and soft numbers 10 be able
to develop a price. This would take about four to six months to gather the required information. It
was proposed that the term sheet presented to the County would include a nonrefundable
$100,000 option, which would be applied toward the final purchase price.
Mike Ozawa reported that he has met with County staff and they are prepared to give us the
information. However, when asked how much it costs to operate the landfill system, they have
answered with what they need to operate the system. That need could include any amount of
money for other County accounts.
The governance issue was discussed. There are two options: 1) to form a new County Sanitation
District, or 2) form a Joint Powers Agreement. The requirements and benefits of both options were
discussed. It was mentioned that the existing Sanitation Districts could have a seat on the new
District, and the existing staff would provide the management of the new system.
One concern raised by cities and other agencies is that the tipping fees already provide the
funding necessary for the purchase of the landfills. The transfer of the landfills to a new
organization using long-term debt financing for acquisition, may result in added costs. Betty
indicated that the acquisition costs are the price associated with removing the landfill system to a
new organization in order to establish policy control, and the users of the landfill system have not
fully funded the purchase of the landfills because the costs incurred in owning a landfill accrue
forward in time from siting, construction and permitting through operation and maintenance to
actual closure and beyond. The costs incurred in owning a landfill are met by the tipping fees paid
by the users of the system in the past, the present, and the future.
The recommendations at this time are:
1. Conduct expanded Phase I assessment studies on moderate and high exposure sites,
which can be done within the existing $100,000 authorization.
2. Authorize an additional $100,000 to delineate Phase II Scope to determine liability.
3. Authorize the issuance of a letter of interest to enter into negotiations for the purchase of
the County of Orange landfill system, including a $100,000 nonrefundable option
payment that can be applied toward the purchase price.
This information will be presented to the Executive Committee on October 18. Consideration of
the recommendations will be requested at the October 25, 1995 Joint Boards meeting.
Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee
Page 4
October 18, 1995
(7) CLOSED SESSION
There was no need for a Closed Session.
(8) OTHER BUSINESS
There was no other business discussed.
(9) MATTERS TO BE REPORTED ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING
There were no matters to be reported on at a subsequent meeting.
(10) MATTERS ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT.
There were no matters addressed.
(11) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING
The next Ad Hoc Committee meeting will be at the call of the Chair.
(12) ADJOURNMENT
The Ad Hoc Committee adjourned at approximately 5:35 p.m.
Submitted by:
Jean Tappan, Secretary
rwnoocnrminxmuurnacxo+aermi
Status of Due Diligence
Proposed Acquisition
of
Orange County Solid Waste Management System
Presented To:
Ad Hoc Committee Re Landfill Issues
October 18, 1995
I. Solid Waste Management - A Regional Perspective
Il. Overview of Current Orange County Landfill System
Ill. Wastestream Flow Control
IV. Preliminary Due Diligence Review
V. Preliminary Term Sheet
VI. Policy Issues
Ad Hoc Committee Re Landfill Issues
I. Solid Waste Management
• A Regional Perspective (A)
• Permitted Landfill Life (B)
• Landfill Tipping Fees (C)
• The Future In Southern California (D)
Ad Hoc Committee Re Landfill Issues
REGIONAL PERSPECTIVE (T-A)
• Six County Area
Orange(County landfills)
Los Angeles(Public and private landfills)
San Diego(County landfills)
Riverside(County landfills, El Sobrante in partnership with Western Waste)
San Bernardino (County landfills)
Ventura(County and private landfills)
• Remote sites
Permitted
La Paz(Arizona-BFI)
Franconia(Arizona-WMX)
Roosevelt (Washington -Rabanco)
ECDC (Utah-ECDC Corp)
Lockwood (Nevada-Refuse, Inc.)
Planned
Eagle Mountain(Riverside)
Mesquite(Imperial)
Bolo(San Bernardino)
Elsmere(LA)
BUSINESS CONSIDERATIONS
• Buyers market(excess landfill capacity)
• Dynamic commodity(transfer stations prevalent and multiplying-60 to 70"/, of trash through
transfer stations in Orange County)
• Trucking competitive to 150 miles
• Rail competitive to 1,000 miles coupled with low landfill tipping fee(S IO to $15 per ton)
• Large haulers will use their own disposal sites wherever possible
Ad Hoc Committee Re Landfill Issues
Permitted Landfill Life
60
50
40
C
u 30
20
10
0
Oren" Loa AnSetae Son Oiaga Vantvra Rlvaraida San aernadino
County
(_-C)
Landfill Tipping Fees
$50.00
$45.00
$40.00
$35.00
$30.00
m
$25.00
$20.00
$15.00
$10.00
$5.00
$0.00
Orange Los Angeles Son Diego Venwm Rl.relde Sian Bernadine Remote Site,
County
FUTURE IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
• Decreasing local landfill capacity
• Increasing number of NWs and transfer stations
• Permitting of additional remote landfills in and out of State
• Increased recycling and composting up to 400/6 range(AB 939)
• Increasing waste generation as recession ends (working against reductions from AB 939)
• Emergence of rail haul
20 years from now, Orange County could be the only large metropolitan county in the State with
operating landfills.
Orange County planned well in permitting large landfills while it was still possible, and in fostering
the development of NWs and transfer stations.
Ad Hoc Committee Re Landfill Issues
II. Overview of Current Orange County Landfill System
• Active Landfills
• Tonnage Projections (A)
- Table 1 (B)
- Liability Status (C)
• MOUs With Host Cities (D)
- Brea
- Irvine
- San Juan Capistrano
• Closed Landfills
- Liability Status (E)
- Low Exposure (11 Sites)
- Limited Exposure (4 Sites)
- High Exposure Sites (6 Sites)
Ad Hoc Committee Re Landfill Issues
N
a
ORANGE COUNTY ANNUAL WASTE DISPOSAL TONNAGE PROJECTIONS
4500
4250
4000
3750
3500
13250
n_ 3000
+� 2750
f 2600
1 2260
N 2000
1750
1500
1250
m
v 1000 lilflill1i
m Y
u
0
Table 1
ORANGE COUNTY LANDFILLS
(30 June 1994)
DAILY TONNAGE D CAPACITY ILLION TONS LIFE 1
LANDFILL PERMITTED CURRENTLY PERMITTED ULTIMATE PERMITTED ULTIMATE
RECEIVED
PRIMA 4,000 1,000 53 72 170 231
OLINDA ALPHA 8,000 4,600 5 43 3 30
BOWERMAN 6,658 4,200 76 85 58 65
(1)At 3 Million tons per year(currently received),and 6 day/week operation.
ACTIVE LANDFILLS
LIABILITY STATUS
Bowerman
• Lined sub-title D landfill
• Opened in 1990
• Five year permit revision in process
• Groundwater monitoring system in place
• Gas monitoring and collection systems in place
• No major violations or enforcement actions
• LEA says site is well run and in compliance
Prima
• Un-lined sub-title D landfill, accepts digested sewage sludge
• Opened in 1979
• General Development Plan N progress
• City to amend General Plan
• Must submit permit revision for sewage sludge
• Leachate extraction system with 4 monitoring wells
• Gas monitoring and control system in place(flare)
• Violations for sludge disposal and land use(being resolved)
• LEA says site is well run and in compliance
Ad Hoc Committee Re Landfill Issues
OlindaMlinda Alm
• Un-lined sub-title D landfill
• Opened 1960(Olinda), 1981 (Olinda Alpha)
• Groundwater contamination has occurred
. 51 wells installed
remediation system in place
treatment system in place
• Landfill gas problems have occurred
. collection system installed (Flare)
13 megawatt generating station on -line by 1997
• Operating under Notice and Order for exceeding permit capacity at Olinda - no other
problems
• Applied for permit revision to combine two sites
• LEA says site is well run and in compliance
SantiagQ
• Unlined landfill
• Accepts only 2,500 tons per year(mothballed)
• Expected closure by 1998
• Gas collection system installed (Flare now, energy recovery in future)
• Shallow groundwater contaminated - remediation system has been designed
• Subsurface pyrolysis(underground fire) being controlled by gas extraction system, increased
cover and other controls. No problems noted over last six months.
Ad Hoc Committee Re Landfill Issues
MOU BETWEEN
THE COUNTY OF ORANGE AND THE CITY OF BREA
Executed March, 1992 (Amended: April, 1993 and November, 1994)
PURPOSE: to identify the understanding of the parties regarding continued operation of the Olinda/Olinda Alpha landfill,
and conditions to be implemented to allow for expansion of the landfill.
DISPOSAL LIMITATIONS: Landfill operation will be limited to a maximum annual average of 6,000 TPD. The landfill will
cease acceptance of waste no later than December 31, 2013.
LANDFILL MONITORING: An appropriate leachate collection and disposal system should be in operation by July 1994.
OPERATING HOURS: The operating entity will limit landfill access to the hours of 6:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Monday through
Saturday.
LITTER CONTROL: County shall establish a litter clean-up program for the Tonner Canyon landfill access road from the
landfill entrance to the 57 Freeway, and any other City approved routes to/from the landfill.
VISUAL SCREENING: To minimize the visual impact of the landfill, the County will submit landscaping plans by June
1994, and will implement the plans by July 1996.
BORROW SITE: The County shall aggressively advocate the use of alternative cover, such as shredded green waste,
with appropriate State agencies.
ROAD CONSTRUCTION & MAINTENANCE: County will determine need for reconstruction of all landfill routes located in
the City, and will share the cost of road reconstruction. No expansion of the landfill will occur until the access road and
any landfill related interchange improvements are put out to bid.
LANDFILL PARK: Between November 1994 and November 1996, the County shall contribute $1.5 million for the
development of permanent recreation facilities from the Brea Park & Recreation Master Plan. The County will allocate
$65,000 for development of said Master Plan. Between November 1994 and November 1999, the County will contribute
$3.9 million, plus land acquisition costs, to obtain land and develop an 18 to 20 acre park and recreation complex. !
County shall redesign Olinda Regional Park and contribute $3.4 million for park development from 2015 through 2025. /"� civ�
County shall design and construct a trail ($75,000) through the Beta parcel. All costs will be adjusted annually.
ENVIRONMENTAL CLAIMS: If an unanticipated environmental impact occurs during the operation of the landfill, the City
may file a claim with the County to offset such a burden.
PURSUIT OF ALTERNATIVES: The County and the City agree to explore waste recovery and other alternatives to
landfill operations.
ENFORCEMENT: If the ownership or operating responsibilities of the landfill are transferred or assigned to any other
entity, the County shall ensure that the obligations identified in this Agreement will be reassigned.
SK:cmc
J:\WPDOCIGMV NI)FILLV DHOC\101895.P2
MOU BETWEEN
THE COUNTY OF ORANGE AND THE CITY OF IRVINE
Executed August, 1984
PURPOSE: To resolve certain litigation, and create a binding agreement between the parties with respect to the
commencement and operation of the Bee Canyon/Bowerman landfill.
DISPOSAL LIMITATIONS: Landfill operation will be limited to a maximum annual average of 6,000 TPD, adjusted for
growth within the service area.
LANDFILL MONITORING: County shall install a state-of-the-art methane gas collection system for odor control and
methane recovery. If necessary, leachate collection procedures will be implemented by the operating agency. Daily
random sampling and inspection of truck loads shall be established for hazardous wastes.
REFUSE COMPOSITION: Sludge treatment, including drying, mixing, or dumping of sludge will be prohibited.
PUBLIC DUMPING: County will exclude public dumping as long as some alternative is available in the area.
OPERATING HOURS: The operating agency will limit landfill access to daylight hours Monday through Saturday.
LITTER CONTROL: Upon initiation of landfill operations, the County will implement a litter clean-up program on Sand
Canyon Avenue between 1-405 and the landfill access road.
VISUAL SCREENING: County will provide maximum screening of the landfill access road from view of the village of
Northwood.
ROAD CONSTRUCTION & MAINTENANCE: County will determine need for reconstruction of all landfill routes located in
the City, and will share the cost of road reconstruction.
RESOURCE RECOVERY: County will develop an action plan for implementing a program of resource recovery, including
a target date for waste-to-energy pilot plant operation.
MOU BETWEEN
THE COUNTY OF ORANGE AND THE CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO
Executed September, 1995
PURPOSE: to identify the understanding of the parties as to how the County will mitigate the impacts of Out-of-County
waste disposal at the Prima Deshecha Landfill on the City.
DISPOSAL LIMITATIONS: The landfill currently accepts 1,100 TPD. Disposal of Out-of-County waste shall not cause
the tonnage to exceed 4,000 TPD. Importation shall begin in January 1997. An annual tonnage limitation is stipulated at
1,228,000 tans.
ROAD CONSTRUCTION: If County begins accepting Out-of-County waste, County shall design and construct Antonio
Parkway between Oso Parkway and Ortega Highway by May 31, 1999. The County shall award a construction contract
by December 31, 1997.
SOUNDNISUAL SCREENING: County shall construct an earthen berm (4 to 5 feet high by 900 feet long) along Avenida
La Pate to buffer residential units from noise generated by vehicles traveling to the landfill.
PARK USE FINANCING: County agrees that the GDP for the landfill will include a financial analysis and plan for the
ultimate recreational land uses following closure of the landfill.
HOST FEE: As mitigation for landfill access, the County will pay the City no less than $0.81 per ton for each ton of Out-
of-County waste deposited at the landfill.
CLOSED LANDFILLS
LIABILITY STATUS
Overview
• 21 sites owned and/or operated by the County of Orange
• Coyote Canyon is the largest, closed in 1990 under new regulations
Remaining 20 sites have been closed for 18 years or more
• Many sites were former gravel pits
6 sites adjacent to water courses
• Water SWATS prepared for 17
• Air SWATS prepared for 4
• 4 sites have law suits pending against them, one other site is involved in a monetary settlement
• 15 sites have groundwater monitoring systems, 8 have landfill gas monitoring systems
Results of initial Phase I assessment of the 21 sites
1. 11 of the 21 sites have low or very low liability exposure'
2. 4 sites have limited exposure
3. 6 sites have high exposure(law suits, existing contamination, sensitive receptors)
. Longsdon(Garden Grove)
. Canal Street (Anaheim)
. Forster Canyon(San Juan Capistrano)
. Lane Road (Irvine)
. Sparkes Pit (Anaheim)
. Coyote Canyon(Irvine)
Potential remedial actions:
. site closure
. postclosure maintenance
. groundwater monitoring/remer iation
. gas monitoring and control
. repair of ground settlement
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Conduct expanded Phase I on moderate and high exposure sites
2. Deleneate Phase 11 scope
III. Wastestream Flow Control
• California Franchise Agreements and Local
Control of the Waste Stream (A)
• The Promise of a Local Waste Stream (B)
• Legal Strengths and Weaknesses (C)
Ad Hoc Committee Re Landfill Issues
(III-A)
California Franchise Agreements and Local Control of the Waste Stream
Exclusive solid waste franchise contracts have been upheld by California Courts as within the permissible exercise
of police power. See, Waste Resource Technologies v. Department of Public Health. Further, the Integrated Waste
Management Act (Public Resources Code Section 40059) provides that cities may determine whether solid waste
handling services will be provided by franchise, contract, license, permit or otherwise.
A. Exclusive franchise agreements provide control over the destination of flow by stating:
1. City reserves the right to designate to hauler the location for the appropriate disposition and
processing of all solid waste generated within the franchise area.
2. Hauler shall dispose of all refuse in a legal manner at a sanitary landfill, transfer station or other
facility, at the direction of city.
(III-B)
The Promise of a Local Waste Stream
Cities may enter into contracts to promise that they will direct their franchise haulers to deliver waste to the County
landfills, using language such as:
1. 100% of the solid waste proper for disposal at a class III landfill, which is generated within the City shall be
committed and delivered to the County's landfills, provided, however, that City shall not be bound to require
delivery if the same is not allowed by law.
2. The solid wastes generated by state or federal governmental entities are exceptions to the above delivery
obligation. Additional exceptions may be provided for self-hauled wastes and recyclables.
1 Each City will agree to implement a waste flow enforcement program through license, permit or franchise to
assure its waste stream commitment will be met, and these agreements will be entered into or revised at the
earliest possible time. The City will implement such other mechanisms for meeting its flow commitment as
may become necessary.
pu-c►
Legal Strengths and Weaknesses
Flow Control Cases
A. The Carbone v. Town of Clarkstown : A U.S. Supreme Court Decision.
1. Facts: The flow control was achieved by ordinance requiring that all solid waste generated within the
town be disposed of at the town transfer station.
2. Ruling: The U.S. Supreme Court held the Ordinance invalid because it imposed a commercial barrier or
discriminated against an article of commerce: access to the service of processing and disposing of solid
waste.
3. Application of the Case to Orange County Situation:
Best possible Interpretation: Flow control cannot be achieved by requiring local cities to adopt ordinances
requiring that solid waste be delivered to County facilities.
B. Other Recent Cases.
This case shows that the Court of Appeals in the Second Circuit (New York) is reading the Carbone decision in
accordance with the best possible interpretation above.
SSC Corp v Town of Smithtown
1. Flow control was achieved by ordinance prohibiting disposal elsewhere and by a contractual arrangement
whereby the City's exclusive hauler agreed to deliver all solid waste it collected to the facility.
2. Ruling: The Court found the flow control ordinance to be improper market regulation in accordance with
Carbone, but the acts of the city in accessing services through contracts made it a market participant in
economic activity and that activity was allowable.
3. Application of the Case to Orange County Situation:
Best Possible Interpretation: When a city expends its own funds to acquire services, it is a market
participant and may establish favorable contract terms for the serviced purchased.
Concern: In Orange County some hauler contracts or franchise agreements call for payments to be made
directly by businesses/residents to the haulers.
IV. Preliminary Due Diligence Review
• Landfill System Valuation
- Cash Flow (A)
- Operating Costs (B)
- Closure Cost Comparison (C)
• Importation
Ad Hoc Committee Re Landfill Issues
(r V-A)
Cash Flow Due Diligence Issues :
MMMENESSIM
• Present & Future Capital Expenditures
• Future Tipping Fee Levels
• Closure/Post Closure Reserves
• Operating Costs low
(_�-$>
LANDFILL OPERATING COSTS
MMMEN ■ 011 1
■ Orange County
— $21.75/ton (normalized to $18.50/ton)
■ Calabassas (L.A. County Sanitation Districts)
— $14/ton
■ Santa Maria
— $15-17/ton (with estimated economies of scale)
■ National Average (Public sites)
— $13-16/ton
■ Michigan (Cost Model)
— $13/ton
■ Kentucky (Cost Model)
— $20/ton
Clements Environmental
(iv-c)
CLOSURE COST COMPARISON
Disposal Closure Total Estimated Estimated Coat Est. Tipping
Landfill Site Acreage Date Closure Costa per acre Fee Coverage
millions 0 /ton
Calabasas 416 2018 $58 $140,000 $3.20
40 (final phase) $4.6 $115,000
Sailard 1996 Not Applicable
159 (total) $13.2 $83,000
Olinda/Olinda Alpha 358 2025 $40 0112,000 $0.93
Bowerman 362 2053 $32 $8810D0 $0.42
Prima Deshecha 800 2165 $54 $68,000 $0.24
Santiago 130 closed $26 $200,000 closed
Michigan (Modell 80 N/A $8 $1001000 N/A
Ad Hoc Committee Re Landflif Issues
V. Preliminary Term Sheet (A)
Ad Hoc Committee Re Landfill Issues
Terms & Conditions
u
:s
Landfill System Acquisition
setlen county or Orange s¢p�
Purabesv: Orange Cmmtr Sanitation Districts,or SPA
Aarcl To De Purchased: Entire Orange Cuaoty Landfill Wem
-all attire mod closed miles vrlpermits
-all operating,esmow,and thtrd party account balances
Liabilhles To Be As mad: Entim Orange Co,l.endrtil System-so will be defined In the Due Dltigrece Period.
Exlstiug MOU's with boat cMes.
Initial Option Teem: 6 months to months
Option Price: % of the present value of the Canary's lost Importation revemae during the Initial Option Tuml
or stepped option purchase price(pay to play).
Stepped Option Purchase Price will be a credit tawads final acquisition prior.
Due D181mce Period: 6 to 9 monihs,or agreed epos,Initial Option Trrm
4
due Ditigmce Terms: Coenry F%MD wlD provide all larormatloorequested,subject to enafidenddity agreement. n
Intel, Eega a t for Informadoo: Exb ft contrach with wvee hmalers,within the Cannily and ooWde the Cowry; thgolng o
monthly leneage recordsl Scope of Site Assessment Brody (Mot the contract writs the law ftrm)i
Names of 21 e)owd altes for which the Cowry has lhbR41 Why? HU"ofclosed rites?
Current litigations?What bads}WhichSites? Details an ceneskd 1991 Eeflmdivgl Why?
Support for budgeted appal expenditures,professional service and grand madateommoehtracCum ?
maintenance. n
s
Terms & Conditions
InIWi Due DR*nce:
Importatlon: W01 the Seller be party to negotlatloan reprding trash Importatbn?SpmM=Hy,wBl
the contracts be blinding If the Syahm to cold?
AntonioPerkweyt Ice the$43 mil0on cast eetWate acruratel Confirm that the County Road Fund will be
funding for this aphal eapraditum.
Bra park Lauds BstsbOeb specific=MCI for catalog cutoro neat of County to City. CCC€
PrOhnInary Purchase lMce To be determined,subject to doe diligence with reepect to thibgityi plus the eesumptloo
of the System-s$SI mOSon in alatlog debt and etdetlog cash reserve.
Pretlmtsaq Flouncing Terns:
Senior Bonds:
Malorib: 2S to A years
Debt SeMm Corsage: Lm to I.SX
Debt Service Reserve Fond: 10%of par amount of bonds
Rate Covamt: 1.25X to I.SX
u
Jmlor Bonds(Wdm7): a
Matortly: 25 to 30 Yeas
Debt Sevla Coverage: 1.1X 1 plda cep mom mesh
flow repeal to coverage oo Smle Bards
4'
T
a�
A
VI. Policy Issues
• Governance (A)
• Transfer-Purchase Issues (B)
• Staffing Obligations of Successor Agency
Ad Hoc Committee Re Landfill Issues
(VI-A)
Governance
A. Formation of a new County Sanitation District
1. Requirements.
• Board of Supervisors could initiate the formation of a new County Sanitation District .
• Public hearing and voter objection provisions would apply.
• LAFCO has the authority to review and approve the formation of new districts.
2. Benefits.
• County Sanitation Districts can acquire refuse disposal facilities and maintain and operate a system
for disposal of refuse.
• Governance structure is familiar to the cities and entities that participate in CSDOC.
B. Formation of a Joint Powers Agency
1. Requirements.
• Pursuant to Government Code Section 6500, a new joint powers agency can be formed as a
separate legal entity by mutual written agreement of the interested public entities.
• In this case, the JPA could be created by the cities and any public district having the authority to own
and operate a solid waste disposal system (such as CSDOC).
Ad Hoc Committee Re Landfill Issues
2. Benefits.
• Right to exercise any of the powers that its member entities hold in common.
• Flexibility to address the unique interests of different parties in governance participation, operational
responsibility and financial support.
• The existing governing boards of one or more of its members or elected officials from each of its
member entities may comprise the governing body.
Ad Hoc Committee Re Landfill Issues
0•
(VI-B)
Transfer/Purchase Issues
• One concern that may be raised by the cities and other agencies currently using Orange County's landfills is that
their historical payment of tipping fees has already provided the funding necessary for the purchase of the
landfills; therefore, a transfer of the landfills to a new organization, which is accompanied by long term debt
financing for acquisition may results in added costs.
• This can be responded to by acknowledging that the acquisition costs are the price associated with removing the
landfill system to a new organization to establish policy control.
• Further, the historical users of the landfill system have not fully funded the acquisition of the landfills because the
costs incurred in owning a landfill accrue forward in time from siting, construction and permitting through operation
and maintenance to actual closure and beyond to environmental monitoring and maintenance of the closed site.
All of these stages create the total cost of having an available landfill.
• These costs are met by the tip fees paid by the users of the landfill system in the past, the present and the future.
Ad Hoc Committee Re Landrin issues
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County,California
P.O. Box 8127 • 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127
Telephone: (714)962-2411
DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Wednesday, October 18, 1995- 5:30 P.M.
A meeting of the Executive Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13
and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Wednesday, October 18, 1995, at 5:30 p.m., at
the Districts'Administrative offices.
(1) ROLL CALL
The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT:
Present: Terry Andrus, Counsel
Betty Mrgudich, Counsel
John Cox, Jr., Joint Chair Chip Clements, Clements Environmental
Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair Michael Ozawa, Price Waterhouse
Pat McGuigan, Chair, District 1 and John Scholz, Saybrook Capital
OMTS Chair Rebecca Casey, Saybrook Capital
John J. Collins, Chair, District 2 and
PDC Chair
George Brown, FAHR Chair STAFF PRESENT:
Sal A. Sapien, Chair, District 3
Jan Debay, Chair, District 5 Don McIntyre, General Manager
James Ferryman, Chair, District 6 Blake Anderson, Chief Operations Officer
Barry Hammond, Chair, District 7 Judith A. Wilson, Chief Administrative Officer
John Gullixson, Chair, District 13 Gary Hasenstab, Director of Human Resources
Thomas Saltarelli, Chair, District 14 Ed Hodges, Director of Maintenance
Roger Stanton, County Supervisor David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
William Steiner, County Supervisor Bob Dolan, Director of Operations
Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Nancy Wheatley, Director of Technical Services
Absent: Lauri Bluestein, Acting Lab Manager
Dan Tunnicliff, Safely and Health Division
Don R. Griffin, Past Joint Chair Terri Josway, Safety and Health Manager
Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary
Corina Chaudhry, Executive Assistant
(2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
Minutes of the Executive Committee
Page 2 of 8 a
October 18, 1995 b
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no comments by any member of the public.
(4) APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of the September 20 1995, Executive Committee meeting were approved as
drafted.
(5) REPORTS OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR, GENERAL MANAGER. AND GENERAL COUNSEL
(a) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
The Joint Chair requested that an update on the Landfill Issues discussion be added
to the agenda, as a result of the Ad Hoc Committee meeting held prior to this
Executive Committee meeting.
John Scholz reviewed the preliminary term sheet that was prepared for the Ad Hoc
Committee meeting. The costs were based on acquiring the whole system, including
liabilities.
The Committee's recommendation to the full Boards will be to increase the total
authorized expenditures to $300,000, an increase of$100,000 for additional due
diligence and $100,000 as a non-refundable option to the County towards purchase
of the system. The option would apply towards the purchase price.
Director Leipzig expressed his continued opposition to this acquisition at this time.
The General Manager reiterated that this purchase only works if all of the cities buy
into the plan and ensure flow control. He also mentioned that Districts' staff and
consultants are available to meet with any of the cities that have questions or want
additional information.
Both Supervisors Steiner and Stanton said that they supported this plan because it
made sense. The issue of liability should not be looked at as a total, but rather as
some level of probability.
Director Ferryman asked about the motives for doing this. The General Manager said
that it would allow the cities control of governance of the landfill system, ensure flow
control, as well as expectations of profit in the future.
Because of the increasing value of the landfills as sites are closed, there may be
some opposition within the County to selling the system.
A full report will be presented at next week's Joint Boards meeting.
Minutes of the Executive Committee
.. Page 3 of 8
October 18, 1995
(b) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
The General Manager received a call from Neil Cline, the General Manager of
SAWPA, regarding the agreement that is on the agenda, Item (11)(a), requesting that
he and his chairman be allowed to meet with Chair Cox and staff before the Directors
consider the agreement. After discussion, it was agreed to remove that item from the
agenda.
(c) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
There was no report by Counsel.
(6) (a) (1) It was moved, seconded and passed that the minutes of the July 14, 1995 Ad Hoc
Committee Meeting re Space Utilization Study be received and filed.
(2) It was moved, seconded and passed that the Executive Committee concur in the
recommended actions of the Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization Study at the
meeting held July 14, 1995, as follows:
Item 6(b): Authorize staff to proceed with procurement for modifications to the
Administration area pending approval of the revised Floor plan by
Director Griffin.
Item 6(c): Authorize staff to proceed with procurement of mobile office complex
for the Information Technology Department.
Item 6(d): Authorize staff to proceed with the revisions to the Finance and
Accounting areas as discussed with Committee.
(b) (1) It was moved, seconded and passed that the minutes of the September 13, 1995
Ad Hoc Committee Meeting re Space Utilization Study be received and filed.
(2) It was moved, seconded and passed that the Executive Committee concur in the
recommended actions of the Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization Study at the
meeting held September 13, 1995, as follows:
Item 6(b): Approve the Scope of Work for the Space Utilization Study and
authorize staff to solicit proposals. After evaluation, the proposals
will be evaluated by staff and recommendations will be presented at
the October 19, 1995 Ad Hoc Committee meeting.
Item 6(c): Authorize additional space for the Safety and Emergency Response
staff as approved by the Committee.
(7) It was moved, seconded and passed to receive and file draft Minutes of the Steering
Committee Meeting held September 27, 1995.
Minutes of the Executive Committee
Page 4 of 8
October 18, 1995 -
(8) (a) It was moved, seconded and passed to receive and file draft Minutes of the Operations,
Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Meeting held October 4, 1995.
(b) It was moved, seconded and passed to concur in the recommended actions of the
Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Meeting held October 4,
1995, as follows:
OMTS95-043: Consideration of motion to receive and file OMITS Committee
certification for Professional Services to develop an Integrated
Emergency Response Plan and award a contract to Communications
Performance Group, Inc. for a cost not to exceed $125,000 for the
1995-96 Fiscal Year and a total cost of$312,232.
OMTS95-045: Consideration of motion authorizing an increase in the expenditures
for the Districts' in-house analyses supporting the Joint Ultraviolet
Pilot Project between Orange County Water District and the Districts
from $40,000 to $57,000 in direct labor and material costs. The
original expenditures of$40,000 were authorized in April 1993.
Refer to April 14, 1993 Board Item It 3)(b)(2).
One item, OMTS95-019, was pulled from the agenda. Staff was advised that the selling
price of the parcel being considered for the North County Yard had been set at $4.5
million, well beyond what was considered appropriate for the proposed use. Therefore
staff does not recommend proceeding with this acquisition.
(9) (a) It was moved, seconded and passed to receive and file draft Minutes of the Planning,
Design and Construction Committee Meeting held October 5, 1995.
(b) It was moved, seconded and passed to concur in the recommended actions of the
Planning, Design and Construction Committee Meeting held October 5, 1995, as follows:
PDC95-31: Approval of the Partnenng Charter and the Value Engineering Clause for
Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36-2.
(10) (a) It was moved, seconded and passed to receive and file draft Minutes of the Finance,
Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting held October 11, 1995.
(b) It was moved, seconded and passed to concur in the recommended actions of the
Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting held October 11,
1995, as follows:
Item (6): Consideration of motion to approve OMTS95-041 - Compressed
Natural Gas Refueling Station, Job No. P1-51; authorize staff to loan
reserve funds to build the station; and create an enterprise account
and reporting system to track project costs and revenues.
Minutes of the Executive Committee
Page 5 of 8
October 18, 1995
FAHR95-25: Consideration of motion to approve revision of Resolution No. 95-54
Pertaining to Classification, Compensation, and Other Terms,
Conditions, Rules and Regulations of Employment, and to include a
provision for requiring liability and uninsured motorist coverage in the
amounts of$250,000, $500,000, and $250,000.
FAHR95-38: Consideration of the following actions approving authorization for staff
to solicit bids for Phase III and IV Financial Information System (F.I.S.)
Consultant and acceptance of F.I.S. RFP prepared by Deloitte &
Touche:
1. Direct staff to solicit bids for a professional consulting
agreement for the completion of Phase III, Selection Process
for Hardware and Software; and Phase IV, Implementation and
Acceptance of the Selected Hardware and Software Solutions
for the Financial Information System project.
2. Approve for release the Request For Proposal for a Financial
Information System. Distribution of the RFP will be made to
appropriate vendors as identified by the selected professional
consulting firm hired to complete Phases III and IV.
FAHR95-40: Consideration of motion to change the "Agreement for Purchase and
Sale of Capacity Rights in Treatment, Disposal and Sewer Facilities"
between County Sanitation District No. 14 and the other County
Sanitation Districts of Orange County.
FAHR95-41: Consideration of motion to receive and file monthly investment report
and staff report regarding performance monitoring of Pacific
Investment Management Company.
FAHR95-42: Consideration of the following actions re microcomputer acquisition
issues (Specification No. E-261):
1. Recommend to the Joint Boards that the Districts' policy
regarding standards for PC technology shall be that all PC
technology purchases be limited to the most recent list of Tier 1
and Tier 2 vendors as defined by GartnerGroup, for both
desktop computers and mobile computers.
2. Recommend to the Joint Boards that the Districts' policy state
that all purchasing actions relating to the purchase of PC
technology utilize the California Multiple Award Schedule
(CMAS) contracts for the purchase of PC technology from
among the list of Tier 1 and Tier 2 vendors as mentioned in the
previous motion. Staff will compare WAS pricing and choose
the lowest priced Tier 1 and Tier 2 vendor's configuration
applicable to the Districts' needs.
Minutes of the Executive Committee
Page 6 of 8
October 18, 1995
3. Recommend consideration of a motion authorizing staff to issue
a purchase order to Dell Computer, the lowest priced
GartnerGroup Tier 1/2 vendor at this time, in a total amount not
to exceed $208,900.00, plus sales tax, for the Purchase of 60
Personal Computers and monitors and other associated
components (Specification No. E-261).
4. Direct staff to issue an RFP for Hardware Maintenance
Services and an RFP for Software Help Desk Services. Staff
will evaluate proposals, rank and present their
recommendations to the Committee for award of a Purchase
Order for such services.
FAHR9543: Consideration of motion to approve staff recommendation for the
establishment of a Relief Operator bonus of$0.60 per hour for
employees covered by the Operations and Maintenance Memorandum
of Understanding through a Side Letter Agreement in order to reduce
overtime costs.
After discussion, it was moved, seconded and passed, with Director Sapien
abstaining, that action on Agenda Item FPC95-13, Consideration of actions re
reimbursement of participants'deferred compensation contributions, be deferred until
General Counsel has had the opportunity to review the IRS Private Letter Ruling
received by Orange County on their deferred compensation plan reimbursement, and
a determination can be made on possible tax consequences of any restitution effort
by the Districts.
(11) (a) CDnsiderationof the SAWPA agreement was removed from the agenda and will be
considered at a future meeting, as noted in the General Manager's Report.
(b) Verbal report on status of the Strategic Plan.
Staff presented a report on the progress of the Strategic Plan (attached). Judy Wilson
explained the anticipated time line, including Board involvement and consultant
deadlines. The plan will be a two-year process, with completion scheduled for January
1998. The time line is predicated on receiving our NPDES permit by September 1996.
The requirements included in the permit will determine our capital program. Quarterly
workshops for Directors have been proposed to present overviews, seek direction,
make policy decisions, and give staff guidance along the way.
Blake Anderson discussed the elements of the Strategic Plan, as follows:
• Management of peak hydraulic discharge, addressing project land use and
population; performing flow projections; determining Inflow/Infiltration contributions
to the collection system; determining collection system requirements; analyzing
alternate peak flow management options, and determining facility sizing
requirements for peak flows.
Minutes of the Executive Committee
Page 7 of 8
October 18, 1995
• Treatment/Reuse Requirements in order to project ocean quality objectives—
permit conditions; project water reclamation needs, process requirements and
space needed; determine treatment process requirements, associated costs and
plant layout alternatives through 2050, and recommendations for long-term
management of biosolids.
• Support subjects, including estimating staff and space requirements for
administrative, operations and maintenance functions; reviewing source control,
ocean monitoring and laboratory needs; estimating O&M and capital needs and
recommend a financial plan; and describing programmatic options and asset
management opportunities.
Three near-term projects were discussed. They are the rehabilitation of the outfalls
with an estimated cost of$630,000; the management of peak hydraulic discharge with
an estimated cost of$1,150,000; and a new financial analysis, estimated to cost
$390.000.
The total cost of the Strategic Plan is estimated at$2,750,000. In comparision, the
1989 Master Plan and associated EIR cost approximately$4.5 million.
The General Manager mentioned that the costs will depend on how much the Directors
are willing to save to risk having a spill. The reliability we have provided is very
expensive.
Staff will be presenting the near-term projects to the Committees for consideration in
the next couple of months.
(12) CLOSED SESSION
There was no need for a Closed Session.
(13) OTHER BUSINESS
Director Gullixson asked for a status report on the ocean samples in Huntington Beach.
Nancy Wheatley reported that nothing definitive has been found to date. The Boise Chica
State Park may be the culprit. Our consultant is preparing a dye study and these tests
should be done by early November. If available, the results will be provided at the next
Board meeting,
Director Gullixson also requested that the General Manager report on the meeting that was
held to discuss legal services. The General Manager reported that he hosted a meeting last
week with Directors Gullixson, Saltarelli and Bill Mahoney, a past Joint Chair, as well as
Blake and Judy to discuss different ways to provide legal services. General Counsel has
provided breakdowns on their costs, but more precise information is needed on items
included in the miscellaneous category. At the meeting various options were discussed,
including full-time staff counsel, someone from General Counsel's office assigned to the
Districts part-time, and someone from General Counsel at the Districts' offices full time.
Minutes of the Executive Committee
Page 8 of 8
October 18. 1995
The General Manager has a meeting scheduled with General Counsel next week to review
this information. General Counsel will be asked to prepare an analysis independent of staffs
for comparison. The Directors and Mr. Mahoney will then review the information and make a
recommendation for consideration by the Directors.
(14) MATTERS TO BE REPORTED ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING
The SAWPA Capacity Agreement will be considered after a meeting with Chair Cox and the
General Manager of SAWPA.
The Reimbursement of Employee Deferred Compensation Contributions will be considered at
a future meeting.
(15) MATTERS ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT.
There were no matters for a future agenda.
(16) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS
Chair Cox mentioned that the next meeting of the Executive Committee is scheduled
for 7 p.m., Wednesday, November 8, 1995 after the 5:30 p.m. FAHR Committee meeting.
(17) ADJOURNMENT
The Executive Committee adjourned at approximately 7:15 p.m.
Submitted by:
t1-E-w
,reah Tappan, Sec art
xwuexEouc,ssw, suw
TIME LINE
BOARD INVOLVEMENT/CONSULTANTDEADLINES
STRATEGIC PLAN
November 1995 Board Action on SOO and RFP for three projects: Ocean ouffall,
Peak Hydraulic Flow Study and Financial Analysis
December 1995 Staff receives qualification and completes evaluation.
January 1996 Board Workshop -
Overview of Three Project Elements and Time Line for
Strategic Plan.
Staff mails RFPs to qualified firms.
February 1996 Staff receives RFPs and evaluates proposals.
March 1996 OMTS and PDC Committees take action to award contracts for
three projects.
April 1996 Board Workshop -
Overview of Key Policy Issues for Updated Strategic Plan.
June 1996 Consultant submits draft report on ocean outfall.
July 1996 Board Workshop -
Ocean Outfall - Considerations of Options.
August 1996 Completion of Plans and Specs for outfall gate repairs.
September 1996 Secure permit from EPA.
Board action on SOO and RFP on Treatment and Reuse Study.
Initiate CEQA compliance on ocean outfall rehab.
Consultant submits demographic data, land use projections.
October 1996 Board Workshop -
Forecasts - Demographic Analysis and Its Implications -
What's changed since 1989?
November 1996 Board action to award contract on Treatment and Reuse Study
based on 9/96 permit conditions.
Consultant submits draft report with fee categories, relationship
amounts.
December 1996 Begin preparation of draft report on Treatment and Reuse Study.
Time Line
Page 2
October 17, 1995
January 1997 Board Workshop -
Capital Facilities Charges - Financial Analysis.
February 1997 Complete CEQA compliance on ocean outfall.
March 1997 Begin preparation of Program EIR for Stategic Plan.
April 1997 Board Workshop -
Participating the Public - Outreach Strategies for
Communications - Review Decision Model.
Consultant completes Hydraulic Analysis.
Consultant completes Draft Master Plans on Flow, W, Peaking
future production techniques and trunk sewer analysis.
Consultant completes Final report on sanitary service charge,
capital facilities, connection charge and excess capacity charge.
June 1997 Board Workshop -
Presentation on Final Draft of Peak Hydraulic
Discharge; Launching Public Outreach Plan.
Jul - Dec 1997 Outreach - Public discussion.
August 1997 Circulate draft EIR on Strategic Plan. Complete draft report on
Treatment and Reuse.
September 1997 Board Workshop -
Update on Public Dialogue Issues Requiring Resolution and
Direction.
Hold public hearing on draft EIR.
November 1997 Complete Strategic Plan Document.
December 1997 Complete Final EIR
January 1998 Board adoption of Strategic Plan; Certification of EIR
NOTE: This timeline is based on assumption that an approved permit is secured
by September 1996. The permit will provide guidance on Treatment and
Reuse thresholds which will be critical factors in financial analysis and
environmental evaluation.
JAW:cmc
J\WPWPGMJJA=.7MUNE
ELEMENTS OF OUR STRATEGIC PLAN
Lwmi"MANAUME
® Project land use and population.
® Perform flow projections.
® Determine Inflow/Infiltration (I & l) contributions.
® Determine collection system requirements.
® Analyze alternate peak flow management options.
® Determine facility sizing requirements for peak flows.
TREATMENTIREUSE REQUIREMENTS
p Project ocean quality objectives -permit conditions
O Project water reclamation needs, process requirements
and space needed.
O Determine treatment process requirements, associated
costs and plant layout alternatives through 2050.
O Recommend long term management plan for biosolids.
SUPPORT9Ut EATS
p Estimate staff and space requirements for administrative,
operations and maintenance functions.
O Review source control, ocean monitoring and
laboratory needs.
O Estimate O & M and capital needs and recommend
a financial plan.
O Describe programmatic options and asset management
opportunities.
Iof4
STRATEGIC PLAN: NEAR TERM
Highlights of the 1995-96 Program
PROJECT NO. 1 : A9 TALON,-QF,0
® Investigate the interior condition of our 120-inch,
five (5) mile operating outfall.
IM Clean the interior of the 120-inch outfall.
Repair both outfalls, open plugged ports, etc.
Analyze option to intentionally open 120-inch outfall
end gate during peak flows, discuss with Regulators.
Make permanent repair to 120-inch outfall end gate
(gate was damaged during January 1995 storms)
PROJECT NO. 2: 6 p CH
® Develop land use and population data for determination
of daily flows, peak flows and Collection System needs.
Land use data to be shared with financial study (below).
Perform I & I study.
Determine if peak flows can be economically reduced.
10 Review methods to retard peak flows.
Analyze peak flow ocean discharge options.
IM Conduct outfall alternative decision model with
Directors, Regulators and other interested citizens
and environmental groups.
2 of 4
STRATEGIC PLAN: NEAR TERM
Highlights of the 1995-96 Program
PROJECT NO. 3: DETERMINATION OF FINANCIAL CHARGES
O With land use data developed from Project No. 2,
develop multiple land use categories that are tied to
the Orange County Tax Collector's base.
O Review short term financial needs and compare to
existing Capital Facilities Connection Charge; Excess
Capacity Charge; and annual Sanitary Sewer Service
Charge.
O Evaluate near term charge alternatives.
O Review draft information with stakeholders and make
final recommendations to Directors.
O Note: As a part of Project No. 4, as long term facility
needs are redefined, this issue will be revisited for
developing a long term financial charge program.
3 of 4
STRATEGIC PLAN
Estimated Costs
ITEM PROJECT MASTER PLAN
COST COST
1995-96 PROGRAM - NEAR TERM
® PROJECT NO. 1:
Rehabilitate Existing Ocean Outfalls .................. $ 630,000
® PROJECT NO. 2:
Management of Peak Hydraulic Discharge .............................................$ 1 ,150,000
C9 PROJECT NO. 3:
Financial Analysis ........................................................ $ 390,000
FUTURE PROGRAMS
0 PROJECT NO. 4:
Treatment, Reuse ................................................................................................. $ 500,000
Support/Staffing ................................................................................................. $ 350,000
CEQACompliance ................................................................................................. $ 500,000
Public Participation................................................................................................ $ 250,000
TOTAL $ 2,750,000
(For comparison purposes, the 1989 Master Plan cost approximately$4,500,000)
4 of 4
y JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
OCTOBER 25, 1995
ITEM (11)(b)(1): OMTS95-043 Consideration of the following actions relative to
the Professional Services Agreement with Communications
Performance Group, Inc. for design of an Integrated
Emergency Response Plan (Specification No. P-166):
(a) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Operations, Maintenance
and Technical Services Committee certification of the final negotiated fee with
Communications Performance Group, Inc. for said services.
(b) Consideration of Resolution No. 95-104, approving said agreement with
Communications Performance Group, Inc. for said services, on an hourly-rate
basis for labor, including overhead, plus fixed profit, for a total amount not to
exceed $125,000.00 for the 1996-96 fiscal year, and a total cost not to exceed
$312,232.00.
Summary
There are numerous regulatory requirements mandating emergency response and disaster
preparedness. The purpose of disaster preparedness is to identify areas of potential
vulnerability, recommend measures to reduce vulnerability, and to develop emergency
response procedures for personnel in a disaster situation. Emergency response is a response
effort to an unforeseen combination of circumstances that may result in extensive damage,
loss, or destruction, if not addressed. The Districts do not currently comply with all emergency
response and disaster preparedness related regulations.
Since many of these regulatory requirements are duplicative, the Safety and Emergency
Response Division created a Scope of Work for the development of an Integrated Emergency
Response Plan (IERP) that will provide for the protection of the Districts' employees and
surrounding communities, and meet all mandated requirements. The development of the IERP
will require extremely labor intensive data collection and utilization, therefore, it is most
appropriate that a consultant be retained to complete this project in a timely fashion. See
attached Staff Report.
Budget Information
The project will be completed in two phases, with the first phase not to exceed the budgeted
$125,000 for the 1995-96 Fiscal Year. The second phase will be budgeted in the 1996-97
Fiscal Year.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends awarding a contract for Professional Services to develop an Integrated
Emergency Response Plan to Communications Performance Group, Inc. for an amount not to
exceed 1312,232,
V
OMTS Committee Recommendation
The OMTS Committee recommends awarding a contract for Professional Services to develop
an Integrated Emergency Response Plan to Communications Performance Group, Inc. for an
amount not to exceed $312,232.
Executive Committee Recommendation to the Joint Boards of Directors
The Executive Committee concurs with the OTMS Committee recommended actions re
awarding a contract for professional services with Communications Performance Group, Inc.,
to develop an Integrated Emergency Response Plan (Specification No. P-166).
JAWPGG MI GB =TB MBI.GVR
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
w
October 4, 1995
plrona:
171418822411 Board of Directors
County Sanitation Districts of
mailingOBo S127ress, Orange County
P.u.valley 9
FWmta�m vmiay,cocA 10844 Ellis Avenue
82728a127 Fountain Valley, California 92708
cartel address:
Ice"er•Polemic Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Professional Services Agreement with
FauM92 veuey,c4 Communications Performance Group, Inc. in Connection with the Development
sz7c67,CA R P
of an Integrated Emergency Response Plan
In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional consulting
Wider services, the OMTS Committee has negotiated the following fee with Communications
Performance Group, Inc. for the preparation of an Integrated Emergency Response Plan
and Recommendations Report, on an hourly-rate basis including labor plus overhead in an
°w•• amount not to exceed $312.232.
Anaheim
Brae
avene Perk
(.yprass Professional Consulting Services,
Fountain valley direct labor at hourly rates
FWIBrtan
Hunbrigtan Beach plus overhead at 118%, not to exceed $284,054.00
Irvine
Le Habra Subconsultants Fees, not to exceed N/A
Le Palma
Los Bach Fixed Profit 28,178.00
orange
Placenta TOTAL CONTRACT, not to exceed $312,232.00
Bence Ann
Seal Beech
Bourbon
rusbn The OMTS Committee hereby certifies the above final negotateN fee as reasonable for the
vi°a Perinch` services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the
roroa undo P
consultant.
County of Orange
sanitary oletticts Is/ Pat McGuigan /s/Victor Leipzig
Coa[a Meae Pat McGuigan Victor Leipzig
Bergen Groh, Chairman Vice Chairman
Midway City OMITS Committee OMTS Committee
Water 0iemiees
Irn'ne Rench /s/.tudith A. Wilson
Judith son
Chief Administrative Officer
OMTS Committee
A Public Wastewater and Environmental Management Agency Committed 0 Prowabng the Environment Since 1954
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
V
t OBCC ELLI9 AVENUE
P O.9O%9127
September26, 1995 NIINTAINVALLEY.CALIFOWIA927299127
nloes2z 11
STAFF REPORT
OMTS95-043: Consideration of motion to receive and file OMTS Committee
certification for Professional Services to develop an
Integrated Emergency Response Plan and award a contract
to Communications Performance Group, Inc. for a cost not to
exceed $125,000 for the 1995-96 Fiscal Year and a total cost
of $312,232.
Summary
The purpose of disaster preparedness is to identify areas of potential vulnerability,
recommend measures to reduce vulnerability, and to develop emergency response
procedures for personnel in a disaster situation. Emergency response is a response
effort to an unforeseen combination of circumstances that may result in extensive
damage, loss, or destruction if not addressed. Emergency response must be
performed in a systematic, safe, and competent fashion by individuals within their
levels of training, resources, and capabilities. The primary goal of disaster
preparedness and emergency response is to protect life, environment, and property.
There are numerous regulatory requirements mandating emergency response and
disaster preparedness. The Federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration
(OSHA), California OSHA (CalOSHA), Environmental Protection Agency (EPA),
California EPA (CaIEPA), and the local fire departments have specific regulations
governing emergency response. Non-compliance with EPA and CalEPA regulations
may result in citations with fines as high as $25,000 per day, per violation, whereas,
non-compliance with OSHA and CalOSHA regulations may result in citations but fines
are not assessed to government agencies. All citations require immediate corrective
action, usually requiring mitigation and the development of the appropriate programs.
The Districts do not currently have emergency response plans that are in compliance
with the regulations.
Backaround
The purpose of the 1969 Master Plan (Master Plan) is to develop wastewater
collection, treatment, and disposal facility needs for a 30-year planning period.
Volume 7 of the Master Plan, entitled "Disaster Preparedness Plan", contains
discussions of disaster probabilities and severity scenarios, facility and operations
inventories and vulnerability analyses, risk reduction programs, and emergency
l
OMTS95-043
Page 2 of 6
September 26, 1995
response. Volume 7 contains only an outline of an emergency response program
and does not comply with regulatory requirements. Two attempts have been made to
expand upon the Master Plan's Emergency Response Program; however, both were
portions of seismic-related projects and attempted to address emergencies resulting
primarily from earthquakes. A plan of this nature would not have addressed all
mandated emergency response planning requirements and would not have been
effective in protecting the Districts' personnel or the surrounding communities.
Holmes and Narver (HN), the consultant that most recently attempted to develop an
emergency response plan, was unable to provide a plan that met all the Districts'
needs. The HN plan did not comply with regulatory requirements, was not "user
friendly", and did not address the Scope of Work sufficiently. In June 1994, HN
requested to be released from the Emergency Response Plan development portion of
Job No. P1-44/P2-53 (Seismic Retrofit of Structures) after months of work and great
expense to themselves. The Districts did not pay for any portion of the Job related to
development of the Emergency Response Plan.
Prior to 1995, the management of the hazardous materials, hazardous waste,
emergency response and disaster preparedness programs was performed by various
divisions that did not have the resources or expertise necessary to manage these
programs. The newly-created Safety and Emergency Response Division has been
given the authority to develop these programs. The development of an emergency
response plan requires extremely labor intensive data collection and utilization,
therefore, it is most appropriate that a consultant be retained to complete this project
in a timely fashion.
Discussion
Many of the regulatory requirements for emergency response and disaster
preparedness are duplicative. Therefore, Safety and Emergency Response Staff
developed a Scope of Work for the development of an Integrated Emergency
Response Plan (IERP) that will provide for the protection of Districts' employees, the
surrounding communities, and meet all mandated requirements. The IERP will
consist of detailed procedures for managing and responding to emergencies resulting
from natural and man-made disasters and will be consistent with Orange County's
Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS). The Safety and Emergency
Response Division will manage the project, which will account for approximately one-
third of the Safety and Emergency Response Specialist's hours. Additional Districts'
staff will be utilized during all phases of the project for interviews and review of
submittals. After Districts' staff receives training, table-top, functional, and full-scale
OMTS95-043
Page 3 of 6
September 26, 1995
exercises will be performed following the Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) and California Office of Emergency Services (OES) guidelines.
The proposal process was initiated in May 1995, when staff mailed Request For
Qualifications (RFQ) packages to 10 prospective firms. The Districts received a total
of six responses, three of which were qualification packages. The three firms, IT
Corporation (IT), ERM-West, Inc. (ERM), and Communications Performance Group,
Inc. (CPG) were then mailed Request For Proposals (RFP) in August 1995. All three
responded with proposals.
A selection committee composed of Districts' Safety and Emergency Response Staff
was formed to conduct the technical review and evaluation of the proposals submitted
by IT, ERM, and CPG. Each proposal was evaluated based on the six criteria listed
in Table 1.
Table 1
Proposal Criteria Importance
Parameter Factor
Firm Previous IERPs, Components, Useability, 4.0
Expertise/experience, Planning/procedures, and
QA/QC
Team Leader IERP experience, Budgeted time, Years of 1.4
experience, Education/registration, and Districts
familiarity
Team IERP experience, Years of experience, 1.0
Education/registration, and Districts familiarity
Project Approach Completeness, Districts' goals, Understanding 1.8
and detail, Scope improvements, and Proximity
Scheduling Duration, Understanding of Districts' 1.0
complexities, and Level of detail
Proposal Appearance and RFP compliance 0.8
TOTAL 10.0
r
OMTS95-043
Page 4 of 6
September 26, 1995
After the technical evaluation was completed, the sealed proposed cost-for-services
were opened.
Conclusion
Based upon the evaluation of the three proposals, the following conclusions can be
made:
1. Of the three firms submitting proposals, CPG had the highest technical ranking
(Table 2).
2. CPG is the only firm that has extensive experience preparing integrated
emergency response plans for facilities that are at least equal in complexity to
the Districts.
3. CPG dedicated considerably more hours and percentage of hours to the most
critical component of the IERP (planning and procedures) than the other firms.
4. Two firms, IT and ERM, had significant problems with their proposals. IT does
not have satisfactory experience preparing integrated emergency response
plans. ERM's proposal contained many inaccuracies and did not address the
Scope of Work sufficiently.
OMTS95-043
Page 5 of 6
September 26, 1995
Table 2
Weighted Rating
Proposal Parameter Communications Performance IT Corporation ERM-West
Group, Inc.
Firm 1649 755 781
Team Leader 386 259 184
Team 161 127 104
Project Approach 599 386 206
Scheduling 223 162 69
Proposal 141 112 68
RESULTS 3159 1801 1412
(4000 points maximum)
Work Force Estimate, hours 3336 2293 609
Fee Proposal, $ 312.232' 199,942 99,100
Safety and Emergency RECOMMENDED NOT RECOMMENDED NOT RECOMMENDED
Response Division's 1. Proposal was 1. Proposal did not address all 1. Proposal was Incomplete
Recommendations and comprehensive and well done. elements of the Scope of Work. and included projects outside
Comments 2. Strong previous experience 2. Previous work examples of the scope of work.
In the development of were substandard. 2. Previous experience was
emergency response plans. limited.
' Negotiated fee. Initial fee proposal was $350,156.
{
OMTS95-043
Page 6 of 6
September 26, 1995
Staff Recommendation
Based upon the conclusions stated above, staff recommends awarding a contract for
Professional Services to develop an Integrated Emergency Response Plan to
Communications Performance Group, Inc. for an amount not to exceed the budgeted
$125,000 in the 1995-96 Fiscal Year and an amount not to exceed $187,232 in the
1996-97 Fiscal Year, for a total amount not to exceed $312,232. A detailed cost
summary is included in Table 3.
Table 3
Phase' Work Element Labor Hours Cost
1 Needs Assessment 500 $45,780
1 Plan Prototype 224 16,219
1 Plan Outlines 216 18,050
1 Draft Incident Command System 174 15,108
1 Recommendations Report 200 18,312
Phase 1 Subtotal 1314 113,469
2 IERP Volume I - Planning 781 65,193
(50%Submittal)
2 IERP Volume 11 - Procedures 813 69,466
(75% and 90% Submittal)
2 Final IERP and Electronic Copy 143 11,184
(100% Submittal)
2 Spill Prevention and 264 22,759
Countermeasures Plan
2 Printing and Binding 21 1,983
Phase 2 Subtotal 2022 170,585
Phase 1 + Phase 2 Total 3336 284,064
Fixed Profit (9.92%) 28,178
TOTAL CONTRACT, not to exceed $312,232
' Phase 1 is budgeted in FY 1995-96 and Phase 2 will be budgeted in FY 1996-97.
DET:dt
g:WpVhMnnicfi eNfplbrd_rpt
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
MEETING
AGENDA FOR
OCTOBER 25, 1995
Agenda Item (11 )(b)(2): OMTS95-045 Consideration of motion
authorizing an increase in Districts'
expenditures for in-house analyses
supporting the Joint Ultraviolet Pilot Project
with Orange County Water District, increasing the Districts' cost for direct labor
and material, for an additional amount of $17,000.00, increasing the total
authorized amount from $40,000.00 to an amount not to exceed $57,000.00.
Summary
In April 1993,the Districts'Joint Boards of Directors authorized staff to execute an agreement with the
Orange County Water District(OCWD)for pilot testing of ultraviolet(UV) light disinfection technology with
estimated costs of$160,000 to be shared equally by the two agencies. The Districts were authorized to
spend up to$40,000 on consulting fees and approximately S40,000 on in-house laboratory analyses.
The project consisted of three phases; Phase I was designed to characterize the Green Acres Project
filtered effluent;Phase II was conducted to determine the UV dosage response curves;and Phase III was
incorporated to identify maintenance requirements and fouling rates. The Districts'approved budget was
only sufficient to cover Phases I and If. An additional $17,000 is needed to cover direct labor and material
costs.
Staff Recommendation
Consideration of motion authorizing an increase in the expenditures for the Districts'in-house analyses
supporting the Joint Ultraviolet Pilot Project between Orange County Water District and the Districts from
$40,000 to$57,000 in direct labor and material costs. The original expenditures of S40,000 were
authorized in April 1993.
OMTS Committee Recommendation
The OMTS Committee recommends approval of motion authorizing an increase in the expenditures for the
Dishicts'in-house analyses supporting the Joint Ultraviolet Pilot Project between Orange County Water
District and the Districts from$40,000 to$57,000 in direct labor and material costs. The original
expenditures of S40,000 were authorized in April 1993.
Executive Committee Recommendation to the Joint Boards of Directors
Consideration of motion authodzing an increase in Districts'expenditures for in-house analyses supporting
the Joint Ultraviolet Pilot Project with Orange County Water District,increasing the Districts'cost for direct
labor and matedal,for an additional amount of$17,000.00,increasing the total authorized amount from
$40,000.00 to an amount not to exceed$57,000.00.
nwoDoaasuceswcronnexcve
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
6 el ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
IL9 F a 812 NUF ROX
OX
September 20, 1995 vwmnm vau£r.tuiMRNIwnnin ezrze.em
01.1 8823C11
STAFF REPORT
OMTS95-045: Consideration of motion authorizing an increase in the
expenditures for the Districts' in-house analyses supporting
the Joint Ultraviolet Pilot Project between Orange County
Water District and the Districts from $40,000 to $57,000 in
direct labor and material costs. The original expenditures of
$40,000 were authorized in April 1993. Refer to April 14, 1993
Board Item (13) (b) (2).
Summary
The Boards of Directors authorized the Districts to enter into an agreement with
Orange County Water District (OCWD) in a pilot study evaluation of ultraviolet (UV)
light disinfection technology on April 14, 1993 (Board Item (13) (b) (2)). OCWD's
recycled water, the Green Acres Project (GAP) filtered effluent, is disinfected with
chlorine. This project evaluates the effectiveness and costs of using UV light
technology for disinfecting filtered GAP effluent. This technology could be used to
disinfect the effluent from the Orange County Regional Water Reclamation Project
(OCR Project).
The Districts use recycled water to lower operational costs. That use is estimated at
3.7 million gallons-per-day (mgd) for 1995-96.
The project consisted of three phases. Phases I and II of this pilot project have been
successfully completed. Additional funds in the amount of $12,000 in direct labor and
$5,000 in material costs, which are in the Joint Operating Budget, are needed to
complete Phase III of this project.
Backoround
In the 1989 Master Plan, the Districts identified recycled water as a cost effective way
to meet Operations' needs at Plants No. 1 and No. 2. Currently, recycled water is
used for cooling the central generation engines and for irrigation purposes. The cost
of the potable water is approximately three times the cost of the GAP water. In May
1995, it was projected that the 1995-96 usage of GAP water would be approximately
3.7 mgd. When chlorine is used as a disinfectant, there are applications, such as the
polymer make-up water, where the Districts are forced to use potable water due to
the presence of chlorine in the recycled water. UV light technology offers an
a
OMTS95-045
Page 3
September 20, 1995
will be conducted by Districts' Laboratory staff and overtime will not be required.
Districts' staff is asking for the authorization to increase the project expenditures for
the laboratory analyses from $40,000 to $57,000. This includes both the direct labor
and material costs.
Results of Phases I and It
In Phase I It was determined, through a three-month sampling and analysis of the
GAP filtered effluent, that there was no apparent diurnal variation in indigenous
bacteria, bacteriophage, human enteric viruses, total organic compounds, total
dissolved solids, total hardness, total alkalinity, suspended solids, and iron.
In Phase II an 80 to 150 gallon-per-minute UV pilot facility was constructed consisting
of three banks of two UV lights each. Different UV doses were evaluated for their
efficiency in removing bacteria and viruses in undisinfected GAP filtered effluent
which was seeded with a vaccine strain of the poliovirus and bacteriophage. This
was used to determine the UV dosage required to remove the viruses as required by
California Code of Regulations, Title 22. The Phase II project determined that a
minimum UV dosage to achieve compliance with the standard was 130 milliwatts-
seconds/centimeter squared.
Phase III
Phase III is designed to evaluate the maintenance requirements that will be
encountered with a three month continuous operation of the UV lamps. Initially the
lamps will be run to determine the rate and type of scaling. OCWD will experiment
with different cleaning procedures. Once this portion of the study has been
completed, the Districts' Laboratory staff will measure how quickly the UV dosage
degrades. This will be determined based on the log reduction in the concentration of
coliform, coliphage and enteric viruses in the disinfected GAP filtered effluent. The
lamps will only be cleaned when consecutive samples for these indicator bacteria and
viruses are not reduced to acceptable levels by the UV dosage. The Districts'
Laboratory staff will be monitoring these parameters on a weekly basis.
Staff Recommends
Consideration of motion authorizing an increase in the expenditures for the Districts'
in-house analyses supporting the Joint Ultraviolet Pilot Project between Orange
County Water District and the Districts from $40,000 to $57,000 in direct labor and
material costs. The original expenditures of $40,000 were authorized in April, 1993.
Refer to April 14, 1993 Board Item (13) (b) (2).
LB:99
01TSUM\BLUESTEM%DM4.nP
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
MEETING
AGENDA FOR
OCTOBER 25, 1995
Agenda Item (11 )(b)(3): PDC95-31 Consideration of motion to
approve, in concept, the Partnering Charter
and the Value Engineering Clause to the
contract with Margate Construction, Inc.,
for Secondary Treatment Improvements at
Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36-2.
Summary
A few months ago, the Director of Engineering presented information concerning "Partnering".
Specifically, the staff requested the committee's conwrrence on using the partnering concept
on Job No. P1-36-2, Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1. The committee did
concur with the staff to pursue partnering with Margate Construction Company.
A partnering workshop was held at the Districts'office on September 11, 1995, which was
facilitated by Ventura Consulting Group. The results of that workshop are attached
(Attachment 1) in the form of a Partnering Charter. The Districts intend to encourage the
foundation of a cohesive partnership with the Districts' Operations, Maintenance, and
Engineering staffs, the Contractor, its subcontractors and the designers on P1-36-2. This
partnership will be structured to draw on the strengths of each organization to identify and
achieve mutual "partnership" goals. The objective is successful completion of the project within
the provisions of the Partnering Charter.
It is understood that this partnership in no way releases, qualifies or abrogates any of the
participating parties legal or contractual obligations with regard to this project.
One of the features of Partnering is Value Engineering. Value Engineering is a formed
technique by which contractors may suggest methods for performing more economically and
share in any resulting savings. Value Engineering attempts to eliminate or modify without
impairing essential functions or characteristics, anything that increases construction, operation
or support costs.
One of the goals which the partnering established was to reduce the final construction costs of
the contract. To this end we proposed to establish a Value Engineering clause to this contract
which will allow and encourage the Contractor to submit Value Engineering Change Proposals
(VECP).
A VECP is defined as a proposal that:
1. Requires a change to the contract to implement the change.
1-GBAOClyl1l-c-
_ 2. Results in reducing the contract price or estimated cost without impairing essential
functions or characteristics.
3. Results in the net savings of the change shared equally between the Contractor and
the Districts.
PDC Committee Recommendation
Accept and approve the Partnering Charter and the addition of the Value Engineering clause to
the Contract.
Executive Committee Recommendation to the Joint Boards of Directors
The Executive Committee concurs with the recommendation of the PDC Committee.
J-0(IOLI6SU3BAXIBS11--R
SRS:MI: 1.tteife�i?i' ": i ..e:. .t •;'•r D1. :�!e.. v. f,�.r. rss£:. t-i�;�,t
{ ss�7 .. i,9t}.+e;n.�iiii't •'i: i:r.3'i7lfi.f :i {i. 3.e3liitt�.ii ;:.{t.:fe 'iiii££ ,) d:.:&;.
Z @F�i . »s4 F::: ti. er•sspt tiif ft s R' s of ✓ t
� x '.: :.t.,. ..' .. . -�{,• at4£„J, .. :.�.b1 t £�.'::: :+'�{,f(if r.'is'£'41r- '�.vSf•{,: s��£s�,:.. :.:+1£e v�,.
P i - 3 6 - 2
County Sanitation Districts of ="
Orange County `=
Partnership Charter :.
September 11, 1995 =wr
We, the partners of P1-36-2, do hereby commit to carrying out these
== goals below as mutually agreed upon: r=.
m' #1. Complete close out with flow thru in 24 months.
#2. Zero change in contract cost — net change orders and value eng'in
�_,• ,,. #3. Facilitates ability of operating staff regarding access. Staff �.
educated and included in process. Public recognition and acknowledge '
ment. .<•.
r
#4. Done right the first time = high quality and mutually agreed upon.
a #5. ENR article regarding partnering
;m #6. o unresol ed laim3lnitlt,all pa et�sfi_e(1 "r
D tiro �<:7,:•..
-A � s 4t +fF�''r. �££s ,4t, '' to f{t !s lu :3{3Fe .,• s 4 .f+t+.'h '
e
DRAFT
VALUE ENGINEERING - CONSTRUCTION
(a) General -The Contractor is encouraged to develop, prepare, and submit value
engineering change proposals (VECP's) voluntarily. The Contractor shall share in any
instant contract savings realized from accepted VECP's in accordance with paragraphs
below.
"Contractor's development and implementation costs" as used in this clause, means
those costs the Contractor incurs on a VECP specifically in developing, testing,
preparing, and submitting the VECP, as well as those costs the Contractor incurs to
make the contractual changes required by Districts acceptance of a VECP.
"District costs," as used in this clause, means those agency costs that result directly
from developing and implementing the VECP, such as any net increase in the cost of
testing, operations, maintenance, and logistic support. The term does not include the
normal administrative costs of processing the VECP.
"Instant contract savings', as used in this clause, means the estimated reduction in
Contractor cost of performance resulting from acceptance of the VECP, minus
allowable Contractor's development and implementation costs, including
subcontractor's development and implementation costs.
"Value engineering change proposal (VECP) means a proposal that -
(1) Requires a change to the contract, to implement; and
(2) Results in reducing the contract price or estimated cost without impairing
essential functions or characteristics; provided, that it does not involve a
change -
(i) In deliverable and end item quantities only; or
(ii) To the contract type only.
(b) VECP preparation. As a minimum, the Contractor shall include in each VECP
the information described in subparagraphs below.
(1) A description of the difference between the existing contract requirement,
and that proposed, the comparative advantages and disadvantages of each, a
justification when an item's function or characteristics are being altered, and the effect
of the change on the end item's performance.
1
Q
Value Engineering
Page Three
(d) Sharing -
(1) Rates - The Districts share of savings is determined by subtracting Districts
costs from instant contract savings and multiplying the result by .50 percent for fixed
price contracts.
(2) Payment - Payment of any share due the Contractor for use of a VECP on
this contract shall be authorized by a change order to the contract to -
(i) Accept the VECP
(ii) Reduce the contract price or estimated cost by the amount of instant
contract savings, and
(iii) Provide the Contractor's share of savings by adding the amount
calculated to the contract price or fee.
(a) Subcontracts - In computing any adjustment in this contract's price under the
paragraph above, the Contractor's allowable development and implementation costs
shall include any subcontractor's allowable development and implementation costs
clearly resulting from a VECP accepted by the Districts under this contract, but shall
exclude any value engineering incentive payments to a subcontractor. The Contractor
may choose any arrangement for subcontractor value engineering incentive payments,
provided that these payments shall not reduce the District's share of the savings
resulting from the VECP.
JDL:lh
VENTURA CONSULTING GROUP, INC.
PI - 3 6 - 2
Orange County Sanitation Districts
Partnering Workshop
Notes
September 11, 1995
Y
VENTURA CONSULTING GROUP,INC.
P1 -36-2; Orange County Sanitation Districts
Partnering Workshop Notes
September 11 , 1995
Our paradigms:
Owners on:
Primes:
o underbid to get the job
o cheapest and quickest way -- not safest
o take advantage of us
Engineers:
o never wrong
o justify their design
o design what they're comfortable with
Subs:
o cut corners to decrease costs
o primes take advantage of them
o low bid is not necessarily the best quality
o don't manage themselves well
Engineers on:
Primes:
o look for big change orders
o finish and get out before work is done
o want us to do all the work on submittals
o inspectors just slow them down
o only interested in profit
Owners:
o endless pot of money
o don't understand design process
o expect design to be perfect
Subs:
o don't read plans and specs
O
Partnership Goals (Big, Hairy, Audacious Goals):
#1 . Complete close out with flow thru in 24 months.
#2. Zero change in contract cost — net change orders and value eng'ing
#3. Facilitates ability of operating staff regarding access. Staff
educated and included in process. Public recognition and acknowledgement
#4. Done right the first time = high quality and mutually agreed upon.
#5. ENR article regarding partnering and in OC Register.
#6. No unresolved claims with all partners satisfied
-- -------------------------------------------------
#1 . Complete close out with flow thru in 24 months -- How do we
get there?:
a. Developed a 24 month schedule that optimizes construction techniques
and that we're all committed to.
1 . of Tod: meet to identify sequences in construction schedule
regarding operational needs. Who: Dave; Ralph; Bob; Mark; John F;
Mark E; Jim H; Bob 0; Chris C; Terry K; and, Chuck L. When: on 9/25
at 11 AM
2. by Tom: I will identify areas for major time savings by 9/13 at
the precon at 2:30. Will give a preliminary "go" or "no go" or "need
to review".
3. of Dave: have a partnership schedule (goal = 24 months) incorp-
orating the above ideas done by 10/16 and sent to Tod.
4. by Tod: I will approve NLT 11/1
b. Expedited submittal approvals.
1 . of Tod: have a meeting to identify critical submittals and a
process for prioritizing and expediting them. When: 10/26 after
construction meeting. Who: Dave; Orange Cty Water, Jack V; Nick A;
I
d. Expedite material and equipment.
1 . by Chris: O&M manuals will be discussed in submittal meeting
on 10/26
— by Dennis: I can give you maintenance.
e. Found a way to fund 24 month project.
1 . by John/Dave: we will make sure the dollars are in the budget
for next year
f. Expedited change orders.
1 . of all: prior to developing an independent written estimate, meet
to verbally agree on:
a. scope of the change
b. is it a change?
c. time extension if any
d. subs involved
e. approval time and process.
2. of all: we will operate with P2-42-2 understanding re. profit and
overhead rates; markups and equipment/material.
3. by Terry: minimize T&M and expand lump sum change orders on
this project.
g. Expedited training requirements.
1 . by Tod: coordinate training requirements NLT 6 months prior to
project completion -- develop a job specific plan
h. Proactive communicatio and coordination process.
1. by Tod: weekly meetings on Thursdays at 9AM
-- will write meeting notes
issues will stay on agenda until resolved
— notes out NLT end of day on Monday
Who attend: Terry; Ralph, Chuck; Mark; Jim; Ralph; Ops (Wade)
plus all subs with a current issue.
t h. hot line
i. VE session with operators
1 . by Dave L: I will take above ideas and develop an "action plant"
for the partnership
#3. Done right the first time = high quality and mutually
agreed upon -- How do we get there?:
1 . of inspectors/contractors: prior to doing major elements of the
work, meet to verbally establish mutual acceptance standards and:
a. a process for inspection
b. identify how inspector can help the contractor
c. alternative methods of doing the work
2. by Terry: I will review the weekly schedule and we will take
the initiative in scheduling these meetings (above)
3. by inspectors: we will give verbal notice prior to writing a
deficiency.
#4. No unresolved claims -- all parties satisfied -- How do we
get there?:
Our normal paradigm about Breakdowns, Obstacles, Mistakes &
Conflicts (BOMS)
o point the finger
o CYA
BOMS on this project can be opportunities for:
1 . improvement
2. learning
3. change or even creating a breakthrough
4. develop trust
Predictable BOMS on this project:
Mary & Dave: we won't place priority on this project given our other
commitments.
Appendix
Value Engineering equipment that the Districts will receive proposals
from the contractor on to save money on the project:
1. Aeration equipment change from named equipment to aeration panels
2. Remove walls and roofs from DAF's
3. Change aeration blowers
4. Delete one DAF
5. Provide Eimco equipment to allow deletion of one DAF
6. Resolve questions on the sludge collection equipment
7. Fast track the WAS pumping system enhancements to allow removal of
aeration equipment and final clarifiers more flexibly
B. Modify/simplify final clarifier drain routing
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
MEETING
AGENDA FOR
OCTOBER 25, 1995
Agenda Item (11 )(b)(4): OMTS95-041 Consideration of motion to
approve, in concept, the construction of a
Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) Refueling
Station, Job No. P1-51, authorizing staff to
loan reserve funds in the 1995-96 budget to build the station; and directing staff
to establish an enterprise report forfuture review.
Summary
Ed Hodges, Director of Maintenance, will give a brief presentation on the attached staff report
detailing the costs associated with the operation of a Compressed Natural Gas refueling station.
Budget Information
When staff put together this years CORF budget, we did not anticipate participating in this
project and, therefore, did not allocate funds for this project. There are sufficient funds available
in the existing reserves or from postponed projects, therefore, staff is requesting that sufficient
funds be transferred to allow us to build this station with the understanding that as revenues
generated by this project begin to be realized, they will be used to reduce the gallonage charge.
Staff Recommendation
Staff believes this project is worthwhile and recommends that the Committee approve it and
authorize staff to reallocate construction funds in the 1995-96 budget.
FAHR Committee Recommendation to Executive Committee
The Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee recommends the Executive
Committee approve the Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) Refueling Station, Job No. Pt-51,
authorize staff to transfer reserve funds in the 1995-96 budget, and direct staff to establish an
"enterprise report for future review.
Executive Committee Recommendation to Joint Boards of Directors
The Executive Committee concurs with the recommendation of the FAHR Committee.
J 1W VpxBSMC.flfbttBS1184.CVR
v
September 25, 1995
' mm
STAFF REPORT
OMTS96-041: Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) Refueling Station
BACKGROUND
At the September OMTS Committee meeting, staff presented the proposal that was submitted
to the South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD)for some of the AS 2766
funds. On Friday, September 15, 1995, we received notification from the SCAQMD that our
proposal was one of two proposals they would be funding.
In our proposal we had requested $447,662 from the SCAQMD. The total funding we will be
receiving is $447.000.
Authorization was also received at the September OMITS Committee meeting to put together a
second proposal for additional AB 2766 funds. There is $7.5 million available for an Electric
Vehicle project which staff will be considering for a possible proposal. We will keep the
Directors advised.
SUMMARY
As we discussed in September, the Sanitation Districts will own and operate a CNG refueling
station for use by not only Pima Gro but, the Sanitation Districts' future CNG fleet, the cities,
school districts and the public. The cost for this station is estimated not to exceed $835,374.
Attachment"A" of this report is an estimated cost breakdown for constructing this station. The
station wilt be built in stages as the load on the station increases. When operational, this
refueling station will become a revenue stream for the Sanitation Districts.
Attachment"B" to this report Is a proposed schedule to design, permit and construct this
facility. The cost to do this work is part of the Gas Company's responsibility and was included
as an in-kind contribution on its part. The Gas Company, will prepare the plans and
specifications, we will then bid the job (consistent with Districts policies) and will be bringing it
back to the PDC for action.
Also attached for your guidance and information is a Pro Forma Analysis (see Attachment
"C"). The assumptions for this analysis are as follows:
A. ANNUAL LOAD
1. The station will start out with ten trucks in 1996, will grow to 20 trucks in the year
2000 and will further increase to 30 trucks in the year 2005. Each truck will fill up
with 50 gallons of fuel, 4 daystweek, 52 weeks/year. The conversion factor used
per diesel gallon equivalent(DGE) is 1.35.
2. In 1998, the Sanitation Districts will begin replacing its old fleet with CNG vehicles
and this rate will increase 5% per year until the year 2005.
3. The City of Fountain Valley will begin using this station in 1997 and its use will
increase at a rate of 5% per year until the year 2000.
CSDOC 0 C.O. Sox8127 9 Fountain Valley,CA927284127 0 (714)962-2411
a
OMTS95.041
Page 2 of 3
September 25, 1995
4. The public will begin using the facility in the year 1999 and their use will increase
at a rate of 5% per year thereafter.
B. STATION RECOVERY
1. The Sanitation Districts will enter into a long-term contract to provide fuel to the
haulers at a rate of$0.91/gallon.
2. The Sanitation Districts will provide fuel to itself at the current rate for unleaded
fuel which is $0.94/gallon.
3. The Sanitation Districts will provide fuel to the cities at a rate of$0.95/gallon.
4. The Sanitation Districts will provide fuel to the public at a rate of$1.00/gallon.
Please note: The Sanitation Districts would be wise to tie its fuel contracts to a
differential based on the price of unleaded gasoline (which is projected to increase
significantly as the manufacturers are mandated to produce the new reformulated
CARB It fuels).
C. STATION EXPENSES
1. The cost for a them of natural gas is widely traded on the open spot market. In
August 1995, this cost was $0.13 per therm and in this past winter it has ranged
as high as $0.23 per therm. For purposes of this analysis, the worst case was
assumed and $0.23 per therm was used.
2. Taxes are the true cost of the current Federal and State tax.
3. Interstate Demand is the cost to get the therm of gas from the well head to our
plant.
4. SoCal Transportation cost is the cost SoCalGas charges to use their
transportation lines.
5. Fixed Station Maintenance Costs assume that the Districts privatize the
maintenance of the facility and not use Districts staff.
D. NET INCOME
1. Total expenses minus the station recovery.
For purposes of this analysis it was assumed that all $835,374 would be spent in the first
year. In actuality, this station would be built in stages to handle the load as it increased due to
an increase in the demand on the station. Nevertheless, under this worst-case scenario, the
station still shows an internal rate of return of 8%.
4
OMTS96-041
Page 3 of 3
September 25, 1995
BUDGET INFORMATION
When staff put together this year's CORF budget, we did not anticipate participating in this
project and, therefore, did not allocate funds for this project. There are sufficient funds
available in the existing reserves or from postponed projects, therefore, staff is requesting that
sufficient funds be transferred to allow us to build this station with the understanding that as
revenues generated by this project begin to be realized, they will be used to reduce the
gallonage charge.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff believes this project Is worthwhile and recommends that the Committee approve it and
authorize staff to reallocate construction funds in the 1995-96 budget.
EEH:cm
R:\WPD0CW1MEHWMTSl95-041 SR
ATTACHMENT 'A'
u F. NGV Fueling Station Cost Estimate
NGV Fueling Station Cost Estimate
CSDOC NGV FUELING STATION
PROPOSAL COST ESTIMATE
SoCalGas
Components Estimate In-Kind
EQUIPMENT
Electnc Transformer $ 14,000
Electric Switchgear 30,000
Meter Set Assembly 5,000 $5,000
Bus Offloading Panel 1,000
Dryer 40,000
Compressor 250,000
Compressor Enclosure 40,000
ASME Storage Vessel 33,000
Card Reader 16,000
CNG Dispenser 85,000
Minor Components 12,000
Sales Tax (8.25%) 43,395
Freight 7,000
Subtotal $576,395
CONSTRUCTION
Construction Management $ 34,500 $34,500
Electric Tie-in 0
Gas Tie-in 50,000 $50,000
Construction 91,500
Subtotal $176,000
ENGINEERING
Design $ 25,000
Project/Construction Management 20,000
Quality Assurance 10,000
Purchasing 5,000
Subtotal $ 60,000
SUBTOTAL ALL COMPONENTS $812,395
Contingency (20 percent) 162,479
TOTAL* $974,874 $89,500
Rough Order of Magnitude Fs6mete induces N-20 percent to amount for sne-specific design
requirements.
Counfq Sanitation Disfrtcts of Orange County • Appendix F
I'VITICAL DITC IRO S
TASKS 'Mu
If Is H 1l it me 8. X If 11 to It " . non
I.
............................Widi......................... --- -—------------ ....I
3 —----- .............................
DORPROMOM
* .T . .. I ...................... ........ . ...... ..... ...... ..............
... . .... . .. .. . ....
-!.T! ............. .
. .. ....... .....
pA
.......... .................................... ..
............... ..... ............ . I........... . .... . ............ ...
Im 4 01
............ ..........I.., ............................................. . ....... ... ...... ..
................................... ............. ...... ........ ..............................I ...... ..
. ..... ..... 77=1 = = ..................9.................. .......... ..... .....
. .... . .. .. I........ . ......... ...............
...... ........... ......................... ...... .... ..- .............................. ...... ..
�CAL BWP.
ljm!"S[L4IGVIOM.................... .................*.......... ... . .....
.. ..... ...................I .. ...... ..... ...............I........... ..... ..... ......
. ........ ........ ............ ....
3
.................I ........ -----------------
.......... .... ......
...................................I ................... ....................................... I..... ........... .............................. . .....I...... ... ....I .. ............ .... .....II ........... ..... ............. . . ....... .
YMAMDOIM[
"a.... ... . ................ 4 . I'M
............. ... ...... ..... I........................... ........... ..... .... ........I ...... ......-............... - .... ............
................................... .. ............................................ ..... ....................................................
L MApMVI[Lf YROM UIRIIVM . . $. ;
............. ..... ...... 4 ..............I ...... ...... .... ...... .......I.................................. .......
....................L-m
........................................ ... ..... ...... ..............I............. ...... ........
.......... ........................
PERMITS Im
............. ....................1,M ... .....I_... ........ ....................... ....
CONSTRUCTION------*. ....................
lRA?VCMMWTAWW ... .............. ... .... .......... .. ..... ..... ...... ...... ...... ....... ... ...... IlX ..... ... ............................
............... ....... ... .... ............ .............
.... ..... ...............m ................ ..... ......
................................................ ...... . ...... ...... ..... -.... ...... ..................................... .....1..... ................................. ...... ................... .............. .... .... ......
.. ...... .... ......... .....•..... .. .. ....
............ .. ........... .. .................. ... ....
. ... .................L.... ..... ...... . ....... . .....
......................................................... .... ........... ..................... ..................
.......... . .....................----i... .... .... ....
................................................... .... ................. ... ............ ... ...... ... ..... .... .. ........................
.......................... ..... ...... ..... .....
>
....... ...... ...... .. ..... ...... ........... ........... ... ...............- A . ....... ..... ..... .....
............. ....... ..... ... ........... .... .................7
........................... .................. ............ .. ............... .............. ................... ...... ............ ....
m
........... ....... ..... .. ...... .. .. ...
PrNamu 1
WlW 12:13
CSDOC NO STATION
INCOME STATEM 1 19W 1998 t 20D1 3002N
2004 2007 2008 200B 3010
Lead HAULERS 14DA0 140.40 1A0.40 1M.40 MAO MM 2802 2803 42120 42120 42120 02120 42120 42120
Mnwl Load Ne -OCSD am am am 833 7.17 7.91 8.30 8.30 $30 830 830 em
wtll- d M -CRIES SOm 52.50 5.13 57AS 57-M 57.88 57.88 57.85 VAS WAS 57.5 S7.BB 57m
-OTHER 5.00 525 5.51 5.79 838 8.M Tu 7.38 7.76 8.14 am
TOM ANNUALLOAD 1M.M 190A0 198m 208.72 350.44 351.02 351.64 352.97 4B4.08 494.42 4Bt.n 485.14 495SJ 49523
ShBen -MAULERS 81 94A4 128 IMM 13834 238M 236.82 M7m M7A7 M723 333m M27 M51 333.78 334.021 934m
SdtlonR -OCSDtWR41M 4m 520 5.46 5.73 am S32 1 6.54 627 897 627 897 697 697
5latlon Ra -CR0:5 42.41 4453 46.76 49.10 49.10 49.10 49.10 49.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 48.10 0.10
Sm R -OTHER 1. 4.46 4. 492 5.17 5.43 SID am 628 8m e.at 727 7.84
TOTAL STATB3M REo0VERT 81A4 IM75 T8 1 77 285.48 2B6.]7 28721 198.91 29938 3Sm 39502 398.17 398.75 307M 398m
MS�
1
d 02]Ahmn 3228 p.7B 4572 4755 80.60 M.74 BOm Btm 81.18 113.64 11].73 113m 113.5 11]Al 11/D7
wbn3.Od Mra;.tt B.BO 12.45 13.p 1438 21.% 21A1 21A8 2138 21.81 2832 28.38 28.0 2t1.15 28.49 285/
Demand .041Bien11 5.62 7.82 7.95 827 14.02 14A4 14A7 14m 14.12 19.79 19.79 19.79 19.81 19.82 Ism
m rM6en Coffi am 17.14 17.89 19.M 3154 31M 31m 31.71 31.77 M41 44So MM MM 44m Mm
ham lftn nw 20m 18m 18m lam 1Bm 1Bm 18m 18m lam law 18m law 1840 18m 18m
ShclOtl Melnlenanw 0.00 om 0.00 Om am Om Om Om 0.00 am om Om Om a00 om
A3SkwN9m 1221 12.74 13M 22.M 22m R54 E-M 22m 31.67 3l M 31.72 31. 4 31.76 31.79
p0.00 om am om am am Om Om Om Om am Om Om om Om
w D4du0m 0m 0.00 Om om am om 0m am Om am am Om Om OOD Om
suon .a0 0.00 0.a0 am O.00 0m Om 0.00 MOD 0.00 0.00 OM am am Om
TOTAL EXPENSES 8333 11120 11524 130m 16/97 18628 188.82 1869] 18834 2%.8) 258.05 25824 25.44 2Sm 2SA7
NETINCOME 1 1131 SBm 57.75 75.74 10735100.08 108.70 109.s4 11U.02 1M23 139.57 139.99 1M31 1M.71 141.13
CUMMUTATNE NETRlCOME 1 1131 70AS 13BA1 21434 321.84 429.92 538A2 847m 75 R W721 1008.78 1178.72 1317m 1457.74 1598d7
C/SH RMSTATEMENT
NET INCOME ($I.Wa 1131 5956 67.75 75.74 IUM IMM 108.70 1034 110M 130231 Mal 1Sm 14031 14D. 1 141.13
DEPRECIA710N 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0
EPAd Ta Deductlen 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O
CuB Flow 1131 5956 67.75 15.74 10750 loom 108.70 Imu 1107M 1]923 1]9 139m 1M31 10.71 141.13
OMerrWRall,wftO 8%
n
45S6 11311 NMI 67.75 75.741 107m fOB.oe 108.70 10931 /10.02 13823 1395] 1]9m 1M.]t 1M.71 1/1.t]
m
z
Pa 1
W•
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
OCTOBER 25, 1995
Agenda Item (11)(b)(5): FAHR95-25 Consideration of Resolution
No. 95-105, repealing Resolution No. 95-54
pertaining to Classification, Compensation,
and Other Terms, Conditions, Rules and
Regulations of Employment, reflecting
changes occurring in legislation and labor
law, and required insurance coverages.
Summary
At the May 24, 1995 meeting, the Boards adopted Resolution No. 95-54 providing for
classification, compensation, and other terms, conditions, rules and regulations of employment.
This comprehensive resolution replaced Resolutions 79-20 and 79-21 and other resolutions
written and adopted from time to time. In addition to simplify compiling existing resolution
language, several provisions were amended to reflect changes occurring in both legislation and
labor law. Insurance limits for Executive Management employees personal vehicles were also
raised.
Staff and General Counsel have reviewed Resolution 95.54, and are proposing amendments to
reflect staffing changes in the 1995-96 Budget previously approved by the Boards, further
changes in legislation or labor practice, and policy statements that more accurately portray
Districts' managements' new direction.
Staff Recommendation
Adopt Resolution No. 95-105 on the basis that there are no substantive changes in the level or
cost of entitlements over previously adopted resolutions. -
FAHR Committee Recommendation to Executive Committee
The Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee recommends the Executive
Committee recommend the Joint Boards adopt Resolution No. 95-105 on the basis that there
are no substantive changes in the level or cost of entitlements over previously adopted
resolutions.
Executive Committee Recommendation to the Joint Boards of Directors
The Executive Committee concurs with the recommendation of the FAHR Committee, and
recommends that the limits for uninsured motors be increased to the same limits for liability.
J.1WPWLHSl40BSALT@11WL R
�n
1 October 11, 1995
STAFF REPORT
FAHR95-25: REVISION OF RESOLUTION 95-54 PERTAINING TO
CLASSIFICATION, COMPENSATION, AND OTHER TERMS,
CONDITIONS, RULES AND REGULATIONS OF EMPLOYMENT
On May 24, 1995, the Boards adapted Resolution 95-54 providing for classification,
compensation, and other terms, conditions, rules and regulations of employment. This
comprehensive resolution replaced Resolutions 79-20 and 79-21 and other resolutions
written and adopted from time to time. In addition to simply compiling existing resolution
language, several provisions were amended to reflect changes occurring in both
legislation and labor law.
Staff and General Counsel have reviewed Resolution 95-54, and are proposing
amendments to reflect staffing changes in the 1995-96 Budget previously approved by
the Boards, further changes in legislation or labor practice, and policy statements that
more accurately portray Districts management's new direction.
The proposed revision of Resolution 95-54 is attached. Each revision is highlighted by
shading, and summarized below by section. Only those sections involving proposed
revisions are discussed, with the exception of non-substantive technical or style
corrections. If an additional entitlement or cost is involved, the impact is indicated.
Emolovee Employee Bargaining Units' MOU dates and periods are deleted as they
Units. were adopted in Resolution 95-54.
Definitions. Initial and Promotional probationary period definition amended to provide
that "at-will" employees do not serve a probationary period.
Section 2. Employee Group exhibits are amended to reflect deletion of the
Confidential bargaining unit.
Section 3. Reference to the Executive Management Group is clarified.
Section 4. Amended to authorize the General Manager to employ Executive
Management employees on an "at-will" basis, to enter into an employment
agreement with such employees, and to periodically adjust their
compensation within the specified salary range.
CS DOC 0 P.O.Box 8127 0 Fountain Valloy.CA 92 72 0.8127 0 T.I. (714)962-2411 0 FAX(714)962-3954
FAHR95-25
Page 2
October 11. 1995
Section 5. Effective date of the organizational listing and exhibit references are
revised.
Section 6. Contains conforming language to provide that "at-will" employees do not
serve a probationary period; "termination" changed to "released".
Section 7. Exhibit references are revised.
Section 8. Delegates authority for approving initial salary offers beyond the midpoint
of an approved range to the General Manager; also authorizes General
Manager to offer additional vacation to high level prospective employees if
necessary to attract qualified candidates.
Section 10. Reference to the Executive Management Group is clarified.
Section 11. Removes Executive Management employees from the Management
Performance Review Program to conform with Section 40's authority for
the General Manager to set the salary of"at-will"employees anywhere in
the range.
Section 12. Provides for exception of"at-will" employees.
Section 14. Reference to Executive Management Group is clarified.
Section 20. Deletes superfluous language.
Section 50. Incorporates provisions of Resolution 95-81 concerning deferred
compensation.
Section 51. Reference to the Executive Management Group is clarified; eligible
expenses for the Benefits Option Plan are clarified.
Section 66. Clarifies that "at-will" employees may be released without cause.
Sections 98 through 101. Amends and incorporates the provisions of Resolution
83-77 regarding the reemployment of former Districts employees; provides
that former Districts employees may not perform work on Districts projects
for a period of one year after leaving the Districts' employment.
Section 103. Provides that approved MOU provisions shall prevail over resolution
provisions in the event of a conflict.
FAHR95-25
Page 3
October 11, 1995
Staff Recommendation
Adopt Resolution 95- on the basis that there are no substantive changes in the level
or cost of entitlements over previously adopted resolutions.
GGH:lc
J:\W PGOC\FIN\CRANE\FPC.WGIFAHR.MSTAFF.RPTSRFAHR9525
Attachment
RESOLUTION NO. 9554
PROVIDING FOR CLASSIFICATION, COMPENSATION AND
OTHER TERMS, CONDITIONS, RULES AND REGULATIONS OF
EMPLOYMENT
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13
AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, RELATING TO
THE CLASSIFICATION, COMPENSATION AND OTHER TERMS,
CONDITIONS, RULES AND REGULATIONS OF EMPLOYMENT
OF DISTRICTS' EMPLOYEES AND REPEALING RES66UTIONS
7-9 20 AND 79 21, AS AMENDED, AND ALL; RESOLUTIONS 0
. .. .,
C1PORTIONS 4THATW .
AREIN
CONFLICT HEREWITH
. ... .. .. . .. . . ..... ...
WHEREAS, the Distdets' management Feffesentatives have Meshed agreements, as evidensed
fel{ewe;
Engineering VOW04 11126/03 4112V06
Ope.tieasand Ma:nt9Aa ,8-^ 612619il 4 lgsw 4 1��vpo
fYe46ssien_' Gmup 16I4^++,94 021&1/^' ne.--0113.,e-,
Superi:sery GFeup 10AQ104 MY011n„ n4ic.un
NOW THEREFGR�
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14
of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
That the following rules and regulations be established to govern classification,
compensation and other terms, conditions, rules and regulations of employment for all persons
except the General Counsel, but including Executive Management and Management employees,
employed by the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, by and through the Joint
Administrative Organization.
200DMn9
m66 r
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ARTICLE PAGE
I. Definitions 1
IL Basic Salary Ranges 2
III. Classification/Positions/Salaries 2
IV. Probationary Employees 4
V. Compensation 4
VI. Overtime Pay- Non-Exempt 6
VII. Additional Compensation- Exempt 6
Vill. Shift Differential Pay 7
IX. Standby Pay 7
X. Call Back Pay 7
XI. Working Out of Class Pay 8
XII. Vacation 8
XIII. Sick Leave 8
XIV. Personal Leave a
XV. Conferral of Leave 10
XVI. Workers Compensation Leave 10
XVII. Jury Duty 10
XVill. Witness Leave 10
XX Military Leave of Absence 11
XX. Leave of Absence Without Pay 11
XXI. Medical and Family Leave 11
XXII. Bereavement Leave 12
XXlll. Holidays 12
XXIV. Insurance 12
XXV. Deferred Compensation 14
)DWI. Benefits Option Plans 14
XXVII. Executive Management Vehicle Allowance 15
XXVIII. Uniforms 15
XXUL Retirement 15
XXX. Severance Pay 16
XXXI. Working Hours 16
XXXII. Layoff Procedure 16
XXXIII. Discipline 17
XXXIVV, Grievance Procedure 18
XXXV. Problem Solving Procedure 20
XXXVI. Attendance 20
XXXVII. Medical Examination 21
XXXVIII. Light Duty 21
XXXIX. Substance Abuse 21
XL. Rideshare Program 22
XLI. Nondiscrimination in Employment 24
XLII. Sexual Harassment 24
XLIII. Smoke-free Work Environment 24
XLIV. Employment of Former Employees 25
XLV. Miscellaneous Provisions 25
2DO04WIS
lnes_i
I. DEFINITIONS
Regular Full-time employees regularly work an 80 hour bi-weekly pay period for an indefinite
period of time. Regular full-time employees are entitled to benefits as set forth in the various
Memoranda of Understanding and elsewhere in this resolution.
Part-time employees regularly work less than 80 hours in a bi-weekly pay period for an indefinite
period of time. Part-time employees are not entitled to benefits.
Limited Term/Temporary employees are assigned to work 80 hours or less in a bi-weekly pay
period for an irregular or indeterminate period of time. Temporary employees are not entitled to
benefits.
Contract employees are those individuals who provide a unique or special service to the Districts
through an independent contractual relationship, and who exercise completely independent
judgment with regard to the performance of the work. Individuals in this category do not have an
employee-employer relationship with the Districts, and are not entitled to benefits unless specifically
provided in their contract.
Non-Exempt employees who are covered by the minimum wage and overtime provisions of the
Fair Labor Standards Act as amended. Such employees, because of the type of work that they
perform and their earnings level, are subject to receiving overtime pay in addition to any entitlement
otherwise provided for in applicable Memoranda of Understanding or this resolution.
Exempt employees who are not covered by the minimum wage and overtime provisions of the Fair
Labor Standards Act as amended. Such employees are considered exempt by virtue of their duties
in conformance with the Act's definition of Executive, Administrative and Professional
responsibilities.
Initial Probationary Period, includes the first six months of employment with the Districts. This
period is regarded as an extension of the hiring process, and provides an opportunity for both the
employee and the Districts management to assess over a substantial period of time whether or not
the hiring decision was appropriate. Probationary employees become regular full-time employees
upon successful completion of their probationary period and approval form as provided by the
Director of Human Resource.
Promotional Probationary Period includes either the six months or ninety day period, depending
on applicable MOU provisions, immediately following the date of a promotion. This period is
regarded as an extension of the selection process, and provides an opportunity for both the
employee and the Districts management to assess over a substantial period of time whether or not
the decision was appropriate. °f =K ��%Brls do nqj aer<va BprOm666M prgb Pgryary $ '
Resignation is a voluntary separation, including: resignation with or without notice; an
unauthorized absence of three or more consecutive working days; failure to return from leave of
absence as arranged; failure to return from layoff upon recall.
Release is a separation in which the employee is not qualified for the type of work assigned and
no other more suitable assignment is available. Release usually results from no fault of the
employee.
faye��S�Emp eruntg sn initial° r >ri�yti8 isa
20(gLW+a
+rise_+ 1
Layoff is a release of employees when funds or work at a specific skill level is no longer available. ,
Discharge is a separation in which the employee is removed from the payroll for violation of
standards of employee conduct, violation of safety regulations, documented unsatisfactory job
performance or other proper cause.
Termination date is considered to be the last day actually worked by the employee irrespective
of any additional pay they may receive.
II. BASIC SALARY RANGES
Section 1. There are hereby established in the Joint Administrative Organization the basic salary
ranges set forth on Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part of this resolution.
III. CLASSIFICATIONS, POSITIONS AND SALARIES
Section 2 There are hereby established in the Joint Administrative Organization the classifications,
number of positions and their respective salary ranges or hourly rates, as set forth on Exhibit 'B-1"
through "B-9" inclusive, attached hereto and made a part of this resolution, effective on the dates
set forth thereon.
Upon the effective date of the agreement with the Orange County Employee Retirement System
to implement the retiree medical health premium offset program, salary ranges for all employee
classifications shall be increased one percent in accordance with the provisions of Section 47 of
this resolution. In addition, salary ranges will be further adjusted in accordance with the following
schedule.
Employee Group Exhibit No. Adi. Percent Eff, Date
Administrative & Clerical B-1 0.0 11-26-93
3.0 11-25-94
3.0 11-24-95
Engineering B-2 0.0 11-26-93
3.0 11-25-94
3.0 11-24-95
Technical Services B-3 0.0 11-26-93
3.0 11-25-94
3.0 11-24-95
Operations & Maintenance B-4 0.0 11-26-93
3.0 11-25-94
n�'['
3.0 11-24-95
Ganfiden B r go 4 26 92
ag 44 260
2ooa 19 2
17766 1
3.9 47-24-Q6
Professional B 0.0 07-08.94
3.0 07-07-95
3.0 07-05-96
Supervisory Bj? 0.0 07-08-94
3.0 07-07-95
3.0 07-05-96
Executive Management B471'. 0.0 07-08-94
3.0 07-07-95
3.0 07-05-96
Management B-8 0.0 07-08-94
3.0 07-07-95
3.0 07-05-96
Part-Time, Hourly and B-9 0.0 07-08-94
Unrepresented 3.0 07-07-95
3.0 07-05-96
Section 3. Wage adjustments for employees in the Professional, Supervisory; and Executive
Management '-I,.. 0 Groups are awarded from a "merit pool" amount established
annually by the hoards andcated to each department in an amount proportional to the salary
budget of employees included with the Professional, Supervisory and-Executive Warqg;@MVWO
Groups. This pool amount is awarded to individual employees based upon their
performance as determined by the Management Performance Review Program. Employees in the
Professional, Supervisory end- Management 0 MIff%@ft Groups are not entitled
to receive wage adjustments as a result of range adjustments, except to the extent their salary falls
outside the range limits. Further, assignment of individual salaries into the top quartile of "E"
ranges is limited to 20 percent of the employees in the Professional, Supervisory;and-Executive
Management Groups.
Section 4. The General Manager is hereby authorized to employ and assign persons as needed
to occupy the positions established in Section 5 herein and to exercise supervision over all persons
in accordance with the provisions of this resolution and to terminate, for cause, the employment of
any regular full time employee employed under the provisions herein. All other employees, ,
probationary',part-time, limited term/temporary and contract may be terminated at the Districts sole
discretion.
� a s, I�a, fiipld9 ,� " eMo'a�ent"�rrtlp ees, "
ear tat �� pa�,c c� ,�rijraat � ys # to e :f
em o e+3s��w,ha arrQ�t rued'-"ak iA a of a� rd' rIs
Section 5. The current organizational listing of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,
Joint Administrative Organization, designated Exhibit"C", and dated July4,4903�%p
is attached hereto and made a part of this resolution. Exhibit "C' sets forth the oepartments and
divisions of the Joint Administrative Organization and designates the maximum number of
]00ae0a19
1770 1 3
authorized positions In each organizational unit and classifications, except as provided below, and
as subject to amendment from time to time by the Boards of Directors.
The Districts are governed by the provisions of the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act, "FLSA", and
in accordance therewith, after study and evaluation of the duties and responsibilities of all job
classifications do hereby establish those classifications that are within the Executive Management,
_a' Supervisory and Professional Groups all as set forth on Exhibits "";," through "B-
gT.", inclusive, as exempt from the provisions of the FLSA.
If,in the determination of the General Manager, qualified applicants are not available to fill an open
position, the General Manager shall have the authority to fill the position of a lower classification
or pay level until such time as qualified applicants are available.
IV. PROBATIONARY EMPLOYEES
Section 6. BS'�.IS ) , Ydx
persons employed by the Olstricts shaft be deemed probationary employees for a period of six
months from the data of hire. The probationary period may be extended by the Dlstrcls for cause
by advising the employee prior to the expiration of the six-month period. Said cause shall relate
to the need for a further assessment of the individual's abilities to satisfactorily perform the duties
required for thelrjob classification. Probationary employees are not deemed to be regular, full-time
employees until completion of the probationary period and may be lerminaled'($7` by the
Districts at any time during the probationary period and without cause. Said employeesa all serve
at the will of the Districts during this period. In the event of ten*RatientJ6§, of a probationary
....
employee, the employee shall not be entitled to receive any reverence pay.
,U)i "i'4 �'�°e i" f$ i1 : 'fl" i ft.9# ; A'a_"11 provisions of this Resolution shall apply to
probationary employees. with the exception of the Article on Severance Pay. Said employees are
also not deemed to be members of employee representative organizations.
V. COMPENSATION
Section 7. Nor-Exempt employees shall be compensated at an hourly rate within the salary range
authorized for the classification in which they are employed as set forth in Exhibits "B-1"through
.R-4" and "94'. Exempt employees shall be compensated at a monthly rate within the salary
range authorized for the classification in which they are employed as set forth in. Exhibits "B-q"
through ""?r
Section B. Salary offers beyond the midpoint of a range require prior approval by the
K1e�'FC � , f*rt'IBa tvf13�' flei=�f�'l3:�fii��3��Ak'� 4
SraLa anp if`e'�xecgLGe Mareine�t.elTlp74yee�tt thri gent,„D'�„� 'aV
NjanegeTMsu �i' �sa�,�°satt� Ah�`�npp>~� 4'�n�dar�; ,fie �' ar'""`j�g�t•
Shan a rtdafjapfx1d11sY+dn�ppdfgtmelp?ifa Bailbggpnrgnely res'on Itq�r�r
peroo 3ara,4t New employees who are in
class) leahons � bargaining units other than the Pro/esaionah-ar
Supervisor &
Y� nT " .<. Groups who successfully complete their
Probationary Penod and are recommentled for eonlinued employment as regular employees are
eligible for consideration of a salary adjustment of up to one step (5.5%) effective on the first day
of the pay period that follows the date of completion of the Probationary Period (normally 26
weeks). The Salary Review date for subsequent annual reviews is established as the first day of
that pay period following the date probation was successfully completed.
Section 9. Employees other than Professional, Supervisory and Executive Management 0,101,
> who are not at the top of the salary range for their classification are eligible for
consideration of an annual salary adjustment of up to one step (5.5%) on their Salary Review date,
provided their performance satisfactorily meets expectations. Annual performance reviews shall
be completed on a forth provided by the Director of Human Resource8.
Section 10. Employees who earn a promotion are entitled to a promotional increase of at least
5.5%, or to the base of the new range, which ever is greater, upon the effective date of the
promotion. If an employee has not successfully completed his or her Promotional Probationary
Period on their Salary Review date, any adjustment resulting from that annual review will be
delayed until such time as the probationary period is completed. Promotions to classifications not
in the Professiona and Supervisory t! i[v®,Marra enf:ard,'M, Group establish a
H:. ._ 4�.
new Salary Review dale.
Section 11. Employees who are hired into Professional, Supervisory arid-Executive Management
a0di M8i1" 2 ( Group positions with "E" salary ranges shall be offered a salary at or near the
minimum of the range unless their level of background, expertise or prior earnings result in a
requirement for a salary greater than the minimum. The determination of an appropriate salary
should also consider relationships to other employees in the same classification and to employees
supervised, if any.
WL),1 �. Employees in "E" range classifications
serve a Probationary Period of six months and receive a comprehensive performance evaluation
at the end of that period , { „t
Employees who suooessfuf�y coot use their probation are eligible or a salary a lustment
subsequent
-duly in accordance with the provisions of the Management Performance Review
Program established by separate action of the Boards of Directors and as amended from time to
time.
Ut ,wr?.A� l J Aan annual performance review is
completed for all employees in "E" range classifications in accordance with the provisions of the
Management Performance Review Program. Performance based salary adjustments lewd
MOM occur on the first day of the first pay period in July, and may be prorated based upon
the date of hire, promotion, or last increase in those instances where the individual has not
concluded their probation as of July 1.
Employees in "E" range classifications who earn promotions to a new"E" range classification will
normally be offered a salary below the midpoint of the range that is commensurate with their level
of training and expertise, prior earnings, and in an appropriate relationship to other employees in
the same classification and to employees supervised. The new salary will normally represent an
increase of at least 5.5 percent, but not exceed the third quartile of the range for the new
classification. Employees in "E"range classifications are not entitled to a salary adjustment at the
conclusion of the Promotional Probationary Period. If the employee's probation period has not
concluded as of July 1, the performance based salary adjustment is deferred until such time as
probation is successfully concluded. !
Section 12. In the event the duties and responsibilities of a position are allocated to a lower paid
classification in the course of implementing the findings of a classification study, the salary of the
incumbent of that position shall remain unchanged (Y-rated) in accordance with the following table:
]xgo-1 19 5
111a8_t
Years of Service Tenn of Y-rate
0-3 6Months
4 -5 1 year
6- 10 2years
11 -20 3 years
20 or More 4 years
The Y-rate shall remain in effect until the salary range for the new classification equals or exceeds
the employee's Y-rated salary, or until the tern of the Y-rate expires in accordance with the table
above. If the Y-rate expires before the employee's salary falls within the range of the new
classification, the employee shall be placed on the step of the new range nearest but not more than
the Y-rated salary. Employees become eligible for merit increases and range adjustments when
the Y-rate is no longer in effect. Employees who request a voluntary reduction are not entitled to
a Y-rate. PhreaM, tyo» at?aAI� E�feMGel�fanaga"'s pls.
VI. OVERTIME PAY-NON-EXEMPT EMPLOYEES
Section 13, Non-exempt employees who qualify for overtime compensation for work beyond their
normal schedule shall, at the employee's discretion, either be paid one-and-a-half times their
regular rate of pay, or be granted compensatory time off CCTO") at the rate of one-and-one-half
hour for every hour worked for up to 30 hours worked per calendar year. Such CTO must be
scheduled off during the year in which it is earned.
All overtime hours worked in excess of thirty per calendar year shall, at the discretion of Districts'
management, either be paid at one-and-one-half times the regular rate of pay, or by compensatory
time off at the rate of one-and-one-half hours for every hour worked. Normally, employees who
accumulate in excess of fifty hours compensatory time off, without regard to the elective
compensatory time off referred to in the preceding paragraph, will be scheduled to take such time
off or be paid for the excess accumulated compensatory time off at the discretion of the Districts'
management. For good reason, the Department Head, with the concurrence of the Director of
Human Resources, may allow compensatory time to be accumulated in excess of fifty hours.
When an employee's work schedule requires that they work on an observed holiday, the employee
may opt to be paid at two-and-one-half times their regular rate of pay for the holiday or to be paid
at one-and-one-half times their regular rate and receive an amount of Holiday Compensatory Time
Off equivalent to the number of hours in the shift. Normally, employees that accumulate in excess
of fifty hours of Holiday Compensatory Time Off will be scheduled to take such excess time off or
be paid for the excess accumulated Holiday Compensatory Time Off at the convenience of the
Districts. For good reason, the Department Head, with the concurrence of the Director of Human
Resources, may allow Holiday Compensatory Time Off to be accumulated in excess of fifty hours.
VII. ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION -EXEMPT EMPLOYEES
Section 14, Employees in the Professionaland Supervisory ,';i is ",
� t Groups will be eligible to receive additional compensation at their re"
air rate of pay
for perfor ing extraordinary service of at least four hours with regard to activities of a prolonged
nature involving: major non-emergency facilities failures or shutdowns; major tie-ins of newly
constructed facilities; major start-ups of new facilities or systems; major special projects or assigned
work when a substantial effort must be expended to meet a compliance date or scheduled deadline.
20()D oore
rrse-r 6
Employees in the ,.. ,a{� 'Oiie
ve. eifi, itl inlariagemanE Groups volt be eligible to receive adddional compensation
�.
at one—and times their regular rate of pay for performing the following extraordinary
services: work required by a major facilities failure or necessity to protect public health and safety
caused by an emergency declared as such by the General Manager or their designee; work which
becomes necessary to cover a regularly assigned shift which falls on an otherwise non-work day
or shift.
Written authorization to receive compensation for all such extraordinary service must be obtained
in advance, except in the event such approval is precluded by the nature of the emergency. The
authorization must be signed by the General Manager, a Department Head or their designee, and
set forth the work to be accomplished, the reason such work is required, the anticipated hours and
eligibility for additional compensation. All authorized extraordinary service time worked must be
reported on a form designated by the Director of Human Resources as well as the employee's time
report.
Employees who have received approval for extraordinary service may elect to receive
Compensatory Time Off in lieu of additional compensation on an hour-for-hour basis. Normally,
employees who accumulate in excess of fifty hours of CTO will be scheduled to take such excess
time off at the convenience of the Districts.
Except for performing extraordinary services as defined above, Professional, Supervisory-and
Executive Management -VlelAteTi1 Group employees are not entitled to receive any
compensation or Compensatory Time OH for service rendered beyond their normal work schedule.
Vill. SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL PAY
Section 15. Employees who are assigned to work an a.m. shift of at least seven consecutive hours,
at least four hours of which fall between 0000 hours and 0600 hours, shall receive a shift differential
of $1.25 per hour for all such hours actually worked. Similarly, employees who are assigned to
work a p.m. shift of at least seven consecutive hours, at least four of which fall between 1800 hours
and 2400 hours, shall receive a shift differential of$1.00 per hour for all such hours actually worked.
Employees working 12-hour shifts are entitled to $1.50 per hour for the a.m. shift and $1.12 per
hour for the p.m. shift effective 11-25-94, and $1.75 per hour for the a.m, shift and $1.25 per hour
for the p.m. shift effective 11-24-95. _
IX. STANDBY PAY
Section 16. Standby is time during which an employee is not required to be at the work location
or at the employee's residence but is required to be available for immediate return to work. Standby
assignments shall first be made on a voluntary basis. Except for "E" range employees, an
employee placed on standby shall be compensated at the rate of$100 per week, and will receive
Call Back Pay when actually called to work.
X. CALL BACK PAY
Section 17. Except for "E" range employees, when an employee is called back to work by the
Districle'without prior notice, and the employee has completed his or her normal work shift and left
the plant, or when prior notice is given but the work begins on the same day at least three hours
after completion of the regular shift, the employee shall receive a minimum of three hours of rail
z000.aoaie 7
m66�.i
back pay. The three hours minimum, whether or not actually worked, shall be paid at the rate of
one and one half times the regular hourly rate. Employees who are called back a second time
within a normal shift period are considered to be working for the duration of that shift.
XI. WORKING OUT OF CLASS PAY
Section 18, Employees who are temporarily assigned by Districts' management to perform the
duties of a higher level class cation for a period of at least 200 hours may be eligible for a one step
salary increase, or the first step of the range for the higher level classification, whichever is greater.
The higher rate of pay begins with the 201st hour, and continues until the assignment ends.
Requests for Working Out of Class pay require the approval of the Department Head and the
Director of Human Resources. The 200 hour eligibility period may be waived at the discretion of
the General Manager.
XII. VACATION
Section 19. Except as provided in the Personal Leave Article, regular full-time employees accrue
vacation leave, beginning with the first day of employment, in accordance with the following
schedule:
Years of Service Hours- Biweekly Hours -Annual
In Years 0 through 1 3.08 80
In Years 2 through 4 3.08 80
In Years 5 through 10 4.62 120
In Year 11 4.93 128
In Year 12 5.24 136
In Year 13 5.54 144
In Year 14 5.85 152
In Year 15 and over 6.16 160
Vacation leave begins accruing with the first day of employment, but employees are not eligible to
schedule vacation time off until the completion of one year's continuous service. Vacation leave
may only be utilized in increments of one-half hour or more. Vacation leave is accrued for all paid
hours, including hours actually worked and hours in a paid-leave payroll status. Unless special
approval is granted in advance for good cause by both the employee's Department Head and the
Director of Human Resources, employees may have a maximum accumulation of 200 hours as of
the last day of the final pay period in December of each year. In the event an employee accrues
vacation leave in excess of 200 hours, it must be used prior to said December date, all other
remaining hours in excess of 200 will be paid to the employee in the first pay period in January at
the employee's then current hourly rate of compensation.
XIII. SICK LEAVE
Section 20, Except as provided in the Personal Leave Article, regular full-time employees hired
prior to November 27, 1981, accrue paid sick leave at the rate of 3.5 hours for each biweekly pay
period of continuous service (91 hours per year) not to exceed 651 hours. Regular full-time
employees hired on or after November 17, 1981, accrue paid sick leave at the rate of 3.0 hours for
each biweekly pay period of continuous service (78 hours per year) not to exceed 638 hours,
beginning with the first day of employment.
zoos 19
mes_t 8
Employees may have a maximum accumulation of 651 hours (or 638 hours as provided above) as
of the last day of the final pay period in December of each year. in the e�,ent an employee aaGnuos
Rink lem-0e P exAAgn nf Fi60 heum, �must be used PROF W sa d DesembeF . All ether remaining
hours in excess of 560 will be paid to the employee in the first pay period in January at a rate of 50
percent of the employee's then current hourly rate of compensation.
Section 21. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 20 above, employees may elect annually to
be paid for any unused sick leave hours accrued through the last day of the last pay period ending
in December of each year at their current hourty rate according to the following payoff schedule:
Accrued Sick Leave Hours Bate of Payoff
0-100 0%
101-240 25%
241-560 35%
Section 22. Employees who terminate for any reason other than retirement or death will be
compensated for any accrued and unused sick leave according to the above schedule. Employees
(or their estate) who retire for service or disability or die will be paid at the 50 percent rate for all
accrued and unused sick leave.
XIV. PERSONAL LEAVE
Section 23. Personal Leave is accrued in lieu of any vacation or sick leave benefits by regular full-
time employees in those job classifications currently represented by the Operations and
Maintenance bargaining unit (Exhibit T-fl, as provided in an approved Memorandum of
Understanding, or upon expiration thereof, for all paid hours, including hours actually worked and
hours in a paid-leave payroll status, on a bi-weekly basis as follows:
Personal Leave Hours
Years of Service Biweekly Annual
0 through 1 2.31 80'
2 through 4 5.38 140
5 through 10 6.92 180
11 7.23 188
12 7.54 196
13 7.85 204
14 8.15 212
15 and over 8.46 220
Only 60 hours may be taken in the first year, the 20 additional hours will be credited
to the accrual balance following successful completion of one year's service.
Section 24, Employees may have a maximum accumulation of 400 hours of Personal Leave as of
the last day of the final pay period in December of each year. In the event an employee accrues
Personal Leave hours in excess of 400, they must be taken as scheduled leave prior to said
December date. All other remaining hours in excess of 400 will be paid to the employee in the first
pay period of January at the employee's then current hourly rate of compensation. Regular full-time
employees (or their estate) who terminate, retire or die will be paid in full at the employee's then
current hourly rate of compensation for all Personal leave hours accrued.
z000000ts
1 nw-r 9
Section 25. Employees who elected to bank accrued sick leave prior to the implementation of
Personal Leave provisions may elect to use such time off for absence due to illness or injury once
40 consecutive hours of Personal Leave have been used. Employees (or their estate)who retire
for service or disability or die will be paid at the 50 percent rate for all Banked Sick Leave hours;
an employee who terminates will be compensated for Banked Sick Leave as follows:
Banked Sick Leave Hours Rate of Pavoff
0- 100 0 percent
101 -240 25 percent
241 -560 35 percent
over 560 50 percent
Employees may elect to bank the dollar equivalent of up to 400 hours of Personal Leave accrued
while in a job classification subject to the Personal Leave provisions of the Operations and
Maintenance Memorandum of Understanding upon their promotion or transfer from such
classification. Time subsequently withdrawn from the bank will be charged at the employee's hourly
rate in effect at the time of the withdrawal. Employees who retire or decease will be paid their
Personal Leave Fund balance in full.
XV. CONFERRAL OF LEAVE
Employees may, on a one-time basis and in accordance with the provisions of the Districts' Policy
regarding Conferral of Paid Leave, elect to donate accrued and unused Personnel Leave, Vacation
Leave or Compensatory Time Off to an individual employee who has depleted their own paid leave
as a direct result of a catastrophic medical condition. All such time must be conferred on a forth
provided by the Director of Personnel.
XVI. WORKERS COMPENSATION LEAVE
Section 26. Employees who are injured in the course of their employment are placed on Workers'
Compensation Leave, and receive wage loss benefits to which they are entitled under the Workers'
Compensation Act. Employees may request to receive prorated Personal Leave, Sick Leave or
Vacation pay to supplement their Workers' Compensation payments in an amount such that the
sum of both is equal to the employee's regular base pay.
XVIL JURY DUTY
Section 27. Employees called for jury duty will be granted a leave of absence with pay for the
actual time spent on jury service, less the amount of any jury duty pay received, exclusive of
mileage. A copy of the jury notice must be provided to the employee's supervisor and the Human
Resource Office. Employees must report for work during their regularly scheduled work shift when
they are relieved from jury duty.
XVIII. WITNESS LEAVE
Section 28. Employees shall be granted leaves of absence to serve as witnesses in accordance
with the provisions of California Government Code Sections 1230 and 1230.1.
2000 19
1! 66_1 10
XIX. MILITARY LEAVE OF ABSENCE
Section 29, In accordance with the provisions of the Military and Veterans Code, employees who
are recalled to active service in the Armed Forces of the United Slates, the National Guard or who
are required to fulfill obligations as members of a Military Reserve Unit, will be granted a Military
Leave of Absence. While on Military Leave, employees will be paid their regular base pay for up
to 30 calendar days. Upon an employee's return to the Districts, all benefit privileges, position,
salary and seniority will be restored as if the employee had not been absent in accordance with
federal and state law. Employees who participate in weekend military drill duty are not eligible for
leave with pay for such activity, but may have their regular work schedule changed to accommodate
the required time off based on operational needs of the Districts.
XX. LEAVE OF ABSENCE WITHOUT PAY
Section 30 Employees may request a Leave of Absence Without Pay for up to one year to pursue
a formal course of study or for other acceptable personal reasons. Requests must be submitted
in writing, and must specifically state the reason for the request and the dates of anticipated
absence. All requests are subject to approval by the employee's Department Head and the Director
of Human Resources.
Section 31 Employees must provide two weeks notice prior to the date they expect to return from
an approved Leave of Absence Without Pay. Employees who do not provide such notice may not
be permitted to return to the same position held prior to the leave period. Employees who, without
notice or explanation, do not return to work on the date specified at the end of the period will be
deemed to have voluntarily terminated.
XXI. MEDICAL AND FAMILY LEAVE
Section 32. Under the provisions of the federal Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, upon
completing one year of employment with the Districts and at least 1250 hours of service, employees
are entitled to 12 weeks of unpaid family or medical leave in a 12 month period for three reasons:
the birth or adoption of a child;to provide care during a serious health condition of their child, parent
or spouse; or because of the employee's own serious health condition.
Section 33. In the rase of leaves for foreseeable events such as the expected birth of a child or
a planned medical treatment, an employee must provide notice at least 30 calendar days in
advance. For unforeseeable events, notice is requested as soon as need for the leave is learned
or notice is practicable. Employees are entitled to intermittent leaves not to exceed an aggregate
greater than 12 weeks only when such leave is medically necessary to provide care during periods
of serious illness of an employee's child, parent or spouse. Employees whose spouse is also
employed by the Districts are entitled to an aggregate of 12 weeks' leave during a 12 month period
to care for a newly arrived child or sick parent. If the leave is requested because of the illness of
a child or of the other spouse, each spouse is entitled to 12 weeks of leave.
Section 34, A request for medical leave should be accompanied by certification from the health
care provider of the child, parent, spouse or the employee who has a serious health condition
indicating: the date the condition began; the probable duration of the condition; appropriate medical
facts regarding the condition; a statement that the employee will be unable to perform their regular
functions because of the need to provide or receive care; and, in the case of intermittent leave, the
dates and duration of the treatments to be given.
zaooaooie 11
mes i
Section 35, Employees who take Family and Medical Leave are guaranteed reinstatement to the
same or to a comparable position at the end of the leave period, and continue to receive the same
group health plan coverage and benefits during the leave as if they were continuing to work.
Employees may elect, or Districts' management may require, that paid leave including sick,
vacation, personal, or accrued compensatory time off be applied towards the unpaid Family and
Medical Leave.
=I. BEREAVEMENT LEAVE
Section 36. An employee who is compelled to be absent from work because of the death or
imminent death of either father, mother, grandparent, foster parent, step parent, mother-in-law,
father-in-law, brother, sister, wife, husband, child, grandchild or stepchild shall be entitled to a
maximum of three working days leave with pay in addition to any other leave benefits provided
herein.
XXIII. HOLIDAYS
Section 37. The days listed below are observed by the Districts as holidays. Regular full-time
employees will receive holiday pay if their entire scheduled work shift immediately preceding and
following the holiday are in a paid payroll status. When a holiday falls on a regularly scheduled day
off for an employee entitled to receive holiday pay the employee shall be entitled to equivalent time
off with pay. When an employee's work schedule requires that they work on an observed holiday,
the employee will be paid at their regular rate of pay for the holiday, and will also receive overtime
pay at the rate of one and one-half times their regular hourly rate for all hours actually worked.
Lincoln's Birthday Thanksgiving Day
President's Day Day After Thanksgiving
Memorial Day Day Before Christmas
Independence Day Christmas
Labor Day New Years' Day
Veteran's Day Floating Holiday
XXIV. INSURANCE .
Section 38. The Districts shall provide medical-health insurance coverage through both Health
Maintenance Organizations and an indemnity plan, which at the Districts' discretion may be self-
funded or insured, in accordance with the level of benefits provided in the plans in effect as of the
date of adoption of this resolution, together with life insurance, and disability insurance for the
benefit of regular full-time employees. All insurance coverage shall become effective on the first
day of the month following one full month of employment. An open enrollment period will be held
annually in the month of June.
20We0019
11re9_1 12
Section 39. The Districts will contribute up to the following amounts monthly towards the medical
health plans:
Plan Districts' Contribution
NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL LIFE
Employee only $338.62
Employee & 1 dependent $477.92
Full Family $653.96
FHP
Employee only $134.65
Employee & 1 dependent $215.00
Full Family $275.00
KAISER
Employee only $136.62
Employee & 1 dependent $215.00
Full Family $275.00
All costs of group health insurance coverage in excess of the Districts' contribution shall be paid
by the employee.
Section 40. Any change in insurance rates caused by a carrier after 11-25-94 are subject to the
applicable provisions of the various Memoranda of Understanding approved by the Boards of
Directors.
Section 41. The Districts shall provide and pay the full premium for$50,000 term life insurance on
each employee in the Professional, Supervisory) aPA-Executive Management ffl�
Groups, and the full premium for$15,000 for all other employees.
Section 42, The Districts shall provide a non-work related, short-term disability indemnity plan that
pays up to $336 per week for up to 26 weeks following a fourteen calendar day waiting period.
Employees may request to receive prorated Sick Leave, Personal Leave or Vacation pay to
supplement their short term disability payments in an amount such that the sum of both is equal to
the employee's regular base pay.
Section 43. At such time that an employee completes five years of service, the Districts shall
provide a non-work related, long-term disability indemnity plan that pays two-thirds of the
employee's rate of pay in effect at the time of such disability, not to exceed $5,000 per month, for
up to two years, following a 90-day waiting period of continuous disability.
No combination of disability and sick, personal or vacation leave pay shall result in more than an
employee's regular rate of pay. Employees may not receive short-term and long-term disability
benefits at the same time. An employee who is otherwise not eligible for Districts' paid Long Tern
Disability may purchase such coverage at their own expense.
Section 44. The Districts shall provide dental insurance coverage. Employees shall contribute the
following monthly costs for the Districts' Self-Funded Dental Plan: $0.00 for employee only
coverage; and, $9.00 for full family coverage.
Section 45. The Districts will pay, for employees hired prior to July 1, 1988, two and one-half
months' premium for each year of continuous service of an employee retiring for service, work or
3o60.66a19
17766_1 13
non-work related disability towards the premium costs of coverage for the employee and eligible
dependents under a Districts' medical plan.
Section 46 The Districts reserve the right to unilaterally change plan providers. In the event the
Districts add additional optional insurance plans, the Districts' share of the premium will be the
same as for existing plans as set forth in Section 39 above. In the event the Districts change
underwriters for existing insurance plans, the Districts' share of the premium will be the same as
for existing insurance plans as set forth in Section 39 above.
Section 47. The Districts shall ft enter6d into an agreement with the Orange County Employee
Retirement System (OCERS) to implement the retiree medical health premium offset program
established by the County of Orange wherein the cost of health premiums are offset by $10 per
month for every year of service up to a maximum of 25 years or $250 per month. Upon the
effective date of the agreement, each employee will pay one percent of his or her salary to OCERS
to fund the above program.
Section 48. Employees who have payroll deductions for medical and dental health insurance
premiums shall be entitled to request that their salary be reduced by the amount of those
deductions pursuant to Internal Revenue Code regulations. The amount deducted shall then be
repaid to the employee through the Districts' Reimbursement Program. Participation in this
program does not affect the Districts' contribution to the Orange County Employees Retirement
System.
XXV. DEFERRED COMPENSATION
Section 49, Employees may participate in the Districts' deferred compensation plan, approved
separately by the Boards of Directors, and amended from time to time, subject to all requirements
for participation established by Districts' management. The minimum deposit per pay period is $25,
and the total annual maximum deposit is $7,500 or 25 percent of gross salary, whichever is less,
in accordance with IRS regulations and the Districts' plan.
Section 50: The Districts will contribute towards an employee's Deferred Compensation Account
as specifically provided in District Boards Joint Resolution No. 9 1574414, which is summarized
as follows:
Districts' Contribution
Classification Level Matching Non-Matching
Gen. Mgr. and Asst. Gen. Mgr. -0. $7500
Department Head 3.0% 3.0%
Asst. opartmo,Yead 2.09; 2 S%
Executive-Management;-and 1.0% 2.0%
Professional and Supervisory
XXVI. BENEFITS OPTION PLANS
Section 51. Employees in the Professional, Supervisory and-Executive Management
Matlag"e`r*e Groups who have successfully completed their Probationary Period are entitled to
participate in the Benefits Option Plan. Under the provisions of the Plan, Professional
employees will be reimbursed for up to $500 annually, Supervisory employees up to $1000
annually and Executive Management q iA,,,.f1, pr,.. M employees up to $1250 annually in
2000.00019
1"W_1 14
the . N _rAy, 'AL
Section Section 52. Professional Group employees are also entitled to tuition reimbursement of up to
$250 annually for job related Courses taken to meet changing job demands and to prepare for
advarjcement within the Districts.
Section $3, The Benefits Option Plan will be administered on a calendar year basis, and
employees must designate expenditures by December 1 each year for the following year.
Designations may not be modified during the year. Requests for reimbursement of expenses
must be submitted on the appropriate Districts' form. Plan funds that are designated to offset
insurance premium expenses may be paid directly to the appropriate plan provider on a monthly
or pay period basis at the Districts' discretion.
Section 54. Any funds that are not Claimed in accordance with provisions of the Benefits Option
Plan will be payable directly to the employee or credited to the employee's Defamed
Compensation Account.
XXVII. EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT VEHICLE ALLOWANCE
Section 55. In lieu of a leased vehicle for use in the performance of their duties,
AssislaAiDepartment Heads and above shall be eligible, at the discretion of the General
Manager, to receive a monthly vehiole allowance in an amount equal to $715 if hired prior to
August 24, 1993, and $465 per month if hired after that date, except as otherwise authorized by
the Boards, and as amended from time to time. Each employee receiving the vehicle allowance
shall furnish at their cost all transportation needs in the performance of their duties within the
Counties of Orange, Los Angeles, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Diego, Santa Barbara, Kam
and Ventura. Such employees shall also furnish at least the following amounts of insurance
coverage: Bodily Injury $250,000 each person; each occurrence $500,000; property damage
$250.000. Employees receiving this allowance are prohibited from circumventing the intent and
purpose of the allowance by obtaining the regular use of a District-owned vehicle in the
performance of their duties.
XXVIII. UNIFORMS
Section 56. The Districts shall provide ten uniform pants and shirts, or three lab coats, bi-
weekly)at no cost for employees whose duties require that they wear uniforms. Coveralls shall
also be available as required.
Section . All employees who are issued uniforms must wear them during the performance of
their regular duties. Other clothing appropriate to the occasion, as determined by Districts'
management, may be wom when attending business meetings. Failure to wear required
clothing, shoes and safety equipment may be cause for disciplinary action.
XXIX. RETIREMENT
Section 58. The Districts and its employees shall participate in the Orange County Employees
Retirement System, wherein all eligible employees are considered members. The retirement
program in effect pursuant to the contract between OCERS and the Districts as of December 2,
tz�aaote 15
1977, shall continue in effect unless amendments to contracts or termination of membership is
effected by the Districts subsequent to meeting and conferring with recognized employee units
conceming such proposed amendments or termination,
Section 59. The Districts shall pay 4.5% of an eligible employee's base salary towards the
employee's required contribution to the Orange County Employees Retirement System in
addition to the Districts' payment of the employers required contribution. All monies actually
contributed into the retirement system by an employee will be deducted from gross salary for
taxation purposes in accordance with Internal Revenue Code provisions.
XXX. SEVERANCE PAY
Section 60. Employees are required to give a minimum of two weeks written notification when
terminating employment with the Districts. When a full-lime regular employee is terminated by
action of the Districts, except for dissipkaagcause, the employee will be notified in writing two
weeks prior to the effective separation date. In the event such notification is not given, the
employee shall be entitled to severance pay in accordance with the formula set forth below:
a. Full-time regular employees shall be entitled to six hours pay for each full
calendar month of continuous employment not to exceed eighty hours pay, or as
may be determined by the General Manager.
b. Employees in temporary or part-time classifications, and employees who are
separated for muse, are not eligible for severance pay under any circumstances.
XXXI. WORKING HOURS
Section 61 The mission of the Districts requires that operations and maintenance activities be
carried out on a continuous basis. Administrative and business functions are normally
performed between the hours of 7:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. Monday through Thursday, and until
4:30 p.m. on Friday. Activities and services that involve contact with the public or outside
organizations will be performed during those hours. In addition, individual divisions may
schedule work beyond those hours, subject to approval by the Department Head to meet
specific operating or service requirements in the most cost effective or gfficienl manner.
Section 62. For time record keeping and accounting purposes, the work schedule for full-lime
employees is established as forty hours per week based on a bi-weekly payroll period of eighty
hours. The actual work periods may be scheduled in shifts of five eight hour days each week
(10180 schedule), four nine hour days each week and one addition eight hour shift on alternate
weeks (9/80 schedule) or four ten hour days each week (8/80 schedule). Operations
employees may work three twelve hour shifts each week and one additional eight hour shift on
alternate weeks (7/80 schedule). Day shifts typically begin between 6:30 and 7:30 a.m.
However, actual starting and ending times may vary depending on operational requirements of
each department. Work hours may also be varied, subject to minimum staffing requirements, to
allow for individual circumstances such as ridesharing.
XXXII. LAYOFF PROCEDURE
Section 63. If, in the sole discretion of Districts' management, Human Resource reductions are
necessary, layoff order and recall lists will be developed based upon job classification, priority of
]000-00019
17s _1 16
function, individual qualifications and seniority within the job classification. Employees subject
to layoff will be provided with notification in accordance with the provisions of the Worker
Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act.
Section 64, Employees in classifications subject to layoff may request a voluntary demotion to
any previously held position for which they remain qualified. Such request must be made in
writing to the Human Resource Department within five days of receipt of the Layoff Notice. The
salary of an employee who voluntarily demotes will be unchanged, except that it may not
exceed the lop step of the range for the lower level classification.
Section 65. Recall lists will be developed for all classifications experiencing personnel
reductions, and will be maintained for a period of two years from the date of the layoff.
Individuals will be placed on the list in the inverse order of layoff, so that the last person laid off
is the first recalled. When a vacancy occurs in a classification for which a Recall List exists, an
offer of reemployment will be made to the individual on the top of the list. That individual must
respond to the offer within five days, or the offer will be made to the next person on the list. An
individual who either does not respond or refuses three consecutive offers will have their name
removed from the list.
XXXIII. DISCIPLINE
Section 66. The General Manager is authorized and directed to exercise supervision over all
employees and to impose disci Rag1-aefieasaj',' 1,, forjust cause, upon any person
employed under the provisions of this Resolution. he General Manager shall establish rules
and guidelines pertaining to the procedures governing such actions. The General Manager is
authorized to delegate his authority herein to Department Heads, Division Managers, Director of
Human Resources and other management and supervisory employees as the General Manager
deems aPProPriate. na IM. ��fl'. . tnWA
Section 67, Discipline occurs when any of the following pregressiveactions are taken forjust
cause with respect to any employee: oral reprimand, counseling memo, written warning,
suspension with or without pay, deferral or denial of a merit increase, reduction in pay, demotion
to a classification with a lower top step of pay, or dismissal. Dismissal is the separation from
Districts employment of a non-probationary employee initiated by the Districts for proper cause.
Section 68. A Notice of Intent b1lL, ,.„ q , is not required when the disciplinary
action involves an oral reprimand, counseling memo, written warning or suspension for five or
fewer working days (with or without pay) or deferral or denial of a merit increase.
Section 69. A Notice of Intent C r" ffi#IW 6 tM is required and will be given to an
employee whenever the disciplinary action involves suspension for more than five working days,
reduction in pay, demotion to a classification with a lower top step of pay or dismissal. The
aeliee-�, .tl(vilt shall be given to the affected employee either by delivery in person or by
Certified Mail sent to the employee's last known address. The Notice of Intent shall indicate the
date on which it was personally delivered or deposited in the mail, which shall be the date of
issuance.
The Notice of Intent shall contain a description of the disciplinary action intended, the effective
date of the action, the reasons for the proposed action, and a copy of the charges and materials
upon which the action is based. The Notice shall also provide a statement of the employee's
right to respond, either orally or in writing to the authority initially imposing the discipline, the
2000.OMIO 17
nrss t
person to whom any response must be directed, and the fact that such response must be
received within ten business days of the date of issuance of the notice. The Notice will also
advise the employee of their right to representation.
Section 70. Prior to the effective date of the proposed disciplinary action {"'uTflrJgµ ,
oic the employee will be given an opportunity to respond either orally or in writing to a
management representative with authority to make an effective recommendation on the
proposed action. After review of an employee's response, the Districts will notify the employee
in writing of any action to be taken. Such action may not involve discipline more severe than
that described in the Notice of Intent; however, the Districts may reduce discipline without
further notice.
Section 71. Dismissal shall be preceded by at least one written warning, except in those
situations in which the employee knows or reasonably should have known that the performance
or conduct was unsatisfactory. Such performance or conduct may involve, but is not limited to:
dishonesty, possession, use, sale or being under the influence of drugs or alcohol, theft or
misappropriation of Districts' property, falsification of time records, fighting on the job,
insubordination, acts endangering people or property, or other serious misconduct. The
Districts may substitute documented suspensions with or without pay for written warnings.
Section 72. If a Notice of Intent is upheld and the disciplinary action is imposed, the employee
may request a post disciplinary hearing. The request must be submitted to the Director of
Human Resources within ten business days following the effective date of the disciplinary action
(for suspensions, the effective date shall be the first business day of the suspension). The
Director of Human Resources shall schedule a post disciplinary hearing with the General
Manager or his designee. The General Manager, or his designee, may uphold the disciplinary
action which has been taken or may reduce such discipline without the issuance of further
notice. The decision of the General Manager or his designee shall be final.
Section 73. The Districts may place an employee on investigatory leave without prior notice in
order to review or investigate allegations of conduct which, in the Districts' view, would warrant
relieving the employee immediately from all work duties. If, upon conclusion of the
investigation, neither suspension without pay nor dismissal is determined by the Districts to be
appropriate, the employee shall be paid for the leave. Although an investigatory leave may
exceed fifteen business days, if a suspension without pay is determined to be the appropriate
discipline, a maximum of fifteen business days of the investigatory leave period may be applied
to such suspension without pay. If dismissal is determined by the Districts to be appropriate,
the entire investigatory leave period shall be without pay.
Section 74. Disciplinary action documentation shall be placed in the employee's Personnel File
in the Human Resource Office. Counseling memos and warning letters may be removed from
that file twenty four months subsequent to the date of the memo or letter, provided there has
been no reoccurrence of a similar nature during the period.
XXXIV. GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE
Section 75. A grievance is any charge that management has violated a specific provision of a
Memorandum of UnderstandingeFef this-reaelnfiera Discipline imposed enderunder Article
XXXU it is not reviewable as a grievance under this procedure.
Section 76. A grievance may be brought to the attention of the Districts by an individual
employee or by a recognized employee organization. A grievance may not be brought by the
209600019
17766_1 18
Districts through this procedure. Grievances brought by two or more employees, and
conceming the same incident, issue, or course of conduct, or multiple grievances brought by the
same employee may, upon mutual agreement of the Districts and an employee organization, be
consolidated for the purposes of this procedure. An employee shall have the right to be
represented at all steps of the Grievance Procedure by any other employee within the
bargaining group or representative of the recognized employee organization. Any reference to
days in this article implies business days.
Step 1. An employee who has a complaint shall attempt to resolve it with their
immediate supervisor within five days of the occurrence of the event giving rise to the
complaint. The supervisor shall attempt to resolve the issues surrounding the complaint,
and respond to the employee within five days.
Step 2. If the grievance is not settled informally at Step 1, it may be presented in writing
to the employee's Department Head or designee. This request for formal review must
be presented on a form provided by the Districts within five days of the conclusion of
Step 1. The written grievance must:
a. Identify the specific management act to be reviewed;
b. Specify how the employee was adversely affected;
C. List the specific provisions of the MOU that were allegedly violated, and
state how they were violated;
d. Provide the date of attempts at informal resolution and the name of the
supervisor or individual involved.
The Department Head or his or her designee shall respond in writing to the employee
within ten days after the date the grievance is received.
Step 3. If a grievance is not settled under Step 1 or 2, it may be presented to the
Director of Human Resources for review and written response. The request for formal
review must be presented on a form provided by the Districts within ten days of the
conclusion of Step 1 or 2, and must contain the information specified in Step 2 above.
The Director of Human Resources, or designee, shall respond in writing to the employee
Within ten days after the date the grievance is received.
Step 4. If the grievance cannot be resolved under Step 3, it may be presented to the
General Manager within ten days from the date the Step 3 finding was issued. The
General Manager, or designee, shall respond in writing to the employee within fifteen
days after the date the grievance is received. The action of the General Marit ge"r is
deemed final.
Section 77. General Provisions. An employee shall be given reasonable time off, with advance
approval of his or her supervisor, to investigate and process a grievance. When an employee is
represented by a recognized employee organization, that organization may designate one
employee to investigate and process the grievance. The employee representative shall be
given reasonable time off, with the advance approval of his or her supervisor, to perform this
duty. Time off for investigating and processing a grievance shall be without loss of pay.
Absence from work will be approved only if it does not disrupt the Districts'operations. If the
time requested cannot be provided, another time will be aranged.
Failure of a supervisor, Department Head or other management representative to respond
within the prescribed time limit shall provide a basis for the employee to appeal to the next step.
If a grievance is not presented or appealed within the time limits, it shall be considered settled
xa00000ie 19
on the basis of the preceding response. The Director of Human Resources may be petitioned in
writing to waive the step or time requirements provided sufficient cause exists. Time limits may
also be extended at any step upon mutual agreement of the parties.
XXXV. PROBLEM SOLVING PROCEDURE
Section 78. Employees may bring problems to the attention of Districts' managers through the
Problem Solving Procedure. This procedure was developed to encourage and facilitate the
resolution of employee concems in a responsive and fair manner, and may be used to attempt
to resolve issues which may not be subjected to the Grievance Procedure.
Employees should discuss concerns regarding issues which are not grievable with their
supervisor as soon as possible. The supervisor will review the situation or decision, and
provide a written response within five days of the date they were notified of the problem.
If the problem is not resolved to the employee's satisfaction, they may file a written statement
concerning the problem with the Director of Human Resources within ten days of receipt of the
supervisor's decision. Upon request of either party, a meeting will be held to define issues and
establish the remedies sought. The employee will be provided a written response within ten
days after their statement is received. Time limits may be extended for cause upon mutual
consent of the parties, and the decision of the Director of Human Resources is final.
XXXVI. ATTENDANCE
Section 79. Prompt and regular attendance is required in order to maintain effective and
efficient Districts' operations. For that reason, all employees are expected to report to work as
scheduled unless proper arrangements have been made for authorized absence.
Section 80 Supervisors are responsible for ensuring that employees observe the Districts'
need for prompt and regular attendance. They are also responsible for providing counseling at
each step of this procedure, including referring employees to the Human Resource Department
or Employee Assistance Program for help in dealing with medical, physical, or personal
difficulties related to their attendance problem. All of the facts and circumstances surrounding
an employee's inability to report for work should be considered in the counseling process,
including the employee's performance, overall attendance, reasons for missing work and
prospects for improvement. While the Districts' need for prompt and regular attendance of all
employees is of utmost importance, it is equally important to recognize individual employee
needs in a fair and impartial manner.
Section 8l. Employees must notify their supervisor of their inability to report for work as
scheduled as far in advance as possible, and in no case later than the regular start time.
Employees will be considered late, charged with a partial absence, and have their pay adjusted
accordingly if they arrive for work more than fifteen minutes after their start time unless other
arrangements are made. Tardiness is not acceptable from a performance standpoint, and
should be addressed through a program of progressive discipline.
Section 82. Employees may also be charged with a partial absence, and have their pay
adjusted accordingly, if they leave work early. The notification of absence should include a
reasonable explanation and an estimate of when the employee expects to be able to return.
The Districts may require medical documentation of any absence due to illness or injury,
particularly when there is an indication that abuse of time off privileges may exist.
?000.00019
trw 1 20
Section 83, An absence will be recorded for all unscheduled Personal Leave time off or sick
leave use. However, absences of more than one consecutive day for the same injury or illness
will be treated as a single occurrence. Once an employee has accumulated five separate
unscheduled absence occurrences within a calendar year, which may involve more than five
days due to absences of more than one days duration, their supervisor will meet with them to
discuss the reasons for the absences and the Districts' need for regular attendance. The
accumulation of seven occurrences of absence within a twelve month period will result in a
verbal warning. The eighth occurrence will result in a written warning. Employees who are
charged with ten occurrences of absence within the twelve month period will be subject to
termination.
Section 84. Employees who have perfect attendance for a period of two consecutive months
may have one absence occurrence removed from their accumulation record for counseling
purposes only. Up to three occurrences may be removed in this manner for a total of six
months of perfect attendance.
XXXVII. MEDICAL EXAMINATION
Section 85, All offers of employment are contingent upon successful completion of a pre-
employment physical examination, including a drug screening test. Offers of employment will
not be extended to individuals who fail to pass the drug screen test. However, such individuals
may be considered for other employment opportunities after a six month period has elapsed.
Examinations are provided by the Districts at no cost to the applicant.
Section 86. When there is reasonable evidence to suggest that an employee is impaired in a
manner which endangers his or her own health or safety, or that of others, the Districts may
require that employee to be examined or evaluated by a health care provider. The purpose of
such examination must be job related. Any examination under this provision will be conducted
on Districts' time and at Districts' expense. An employee may submit an independent medical
opinion regarding his or her condition and addressing his or her ability to competently perform
the duties of their position. This information will be reviewed and considered by a competent
medical authority in arriving at a decision regarding the individual's continued employment in the
position.
XXXVIII. LIGHT DUTY
Section 87. An employee who is released by a physician to perform limited duties because of a
temporary disability may be assigned to light duty at the discretion of the Districts. Light duty
may consist of duties other than those normally performed by the employee. An employee
assigned to light duty shall be paid the regular wage rate for the job classification held prior to
being temporarily disabled.
XXXIX. SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Section 88, The mission of the Districts, and its concern for the safety and well-being of
employees and the public, provide for a strong commitment to maintaining a drug and alcohol
free workplace. In support of that commitment, the Districts will not tolerate the unlawful or
unauthorized manufacture, sale, possession, distribution, use or being under the influence of a
controlled substance or alcohol while on the job or on Districts' property.
m000mrs 21
mss r
Section 89. Any employee who is reasonably suspected of controlled substance or alcohol use _
which adversely impacts their job performance or behavior, or who manufactures, possesses,
consumes, sells, or distributes controlled substances or alcohol on Districts' property or while on
Districts' business, will be required to undergo testing for controlled substance or alcohol use.
Reasonable suspicion of the use of or being under the influence of a controlled substance or
alcohol may be based on appropriate factors, including excessive absenteeism or attendance
problems, poor work performance or erratic behavior coupled with one or more of the following
signs: bloodshot or water eyes; very large or very small pupils, runny nose, excessive
perspiration, nausea and vomiting, lack of coordination, slurred speech, or unpredictable
responses to ordinary requests.
Section 90, Employees found to be under the influence of controlled substances or alcohol
while on Districts' property or on Districts' business, or who otherwise violate the Districts'
Substance Abuse Policy,will be placed on a Leave of Absence and referred to the Employee
Assistance Program for evaluation. Return to work will be contingent upon successful
completion of a rehabilitation program and a thorough assessment of the particular
circumstances concerning the abuse. An employee who chooses not to participate in the
rehabilitation program, or in the drug and alcohol screening test, or who tampers with the test
specimen, will be subject to disciplinary action including, but not limited to, termination. Any
employee who successfully completes a rehabilitation program and is subsequently found to be
in violation of the Substance Abuse Policy, will be terminated from employment with the Districts
without further rehabilitative effort.
Section 91, Controlled substances are those substances defined as such in the Federal
Controlled Substance Act or the California Health and Safety Code. All testing procedures will
be in conformance with National Institute on Drug Abuse standards, and will be conducted at a
reasonable time at the Districts' expense.
Section 92, If a Districts' manager or supervisor has a reasonable suspicion that an employee
is under the influence of a controlled substance or alcohol while on Districts' business or on
Districts' property, or otherwise in violation of the Districts' Substance Abuse Policy, they must
refer that employee to the Human Resource Department for a drug and alcohol screening test.
If an employee suspects that another employee is under the influence of a controlled substance
or alcohol in such a manner as to offer concern for the safety and well-being of other employees
or the public, or is otherwise in violation of this policy, that employee has an obligation to
immediately bring the matter to the attention of a Districts' manager or supervisor.
XL. RIDESHARE PROGRAM
Section 93, The South Coast Air Quality Management District's Regulation XV requires that the
Districts offer incentives to reduce commute trips and meet ridesharing goals. In conformance
with those regulations, The Boards have, by separate action, as amended from time to time,
adopted the following incentives to encourage employees to rideshare:
4- ,Compressed bi-weekly work schedules.
(lowing flexibility in the establishment of work hours to facilitate vanpool and other
Ridesharing participation.
-- Designation of preferential parking spaces for Rideshare vehicles.
z0000019
Irani 22
44MOperation of a Vanpool Program offering Districts' provided vans with the following
provisions:
The cost of operating the van would be recovered from the participating employees, with
the driver paying a reduced amount;
The Districts would subsidize up to three empty seats for up to three months when
employee participation turnover occurs to keep the fares consistent and to give
participants time to recruit new riders;
Prospective new participants will receive one free month as an encouragement for trying
vanpooling (to be subsidized by the Districts);
All participants will be required to sign a Vanpooling Agreement approved by the
General Counsel setting forth the conditions of vanpool participation.
&WRProvision of a computerized carpool ridership matching service and routing assistance.
Utilization of certain fleet vehicles currently authorized to be driven between home and
work by employees subject to emergency call-out for ridesharing purposes, as practical.
TWEGuaranteed Ride Home Program utilizing certain fleet vehicles in the event a Rideshare
participant cannot return home at the normally scheduled departure of their carpool or
vanpool.
OfMinstallation and maintenance of bike racks at each plant as well as locker room and
shower facilities.
KM aConversion of in-plant vehicles used in Operations and Maintenance activities to electric
power as appropriate.
Conversion of fleet vehicles to alternate clean fuel systems as appropriate.
Providing additional paid time off: employees Ridesharing at least 60 percent of the time
during a calendar quarter would accrue 4.5 hours of paid time off for that quarter, to be
taken off in the same calendar year, employees Rideshanng at least 90 percent of the
time would accrue 6.75 hours per calendar quarter.
42:I' 4A Packing Fee Program will be implemented only if Districts employees are unsuccessful
in meet SCAQMD mandated Average Vehicle Ridership goals by July 1, 1991, or in any
subsequent quarterly period if such goal is not met. Once the Parking Fee Program is
implemented for failure to meet the SCAQMD mandated Average Vehicle Ridership
goal, it shall thereafter remain in effect.
If the Parking Fee Program is implemented, employees hired subsequent to July 1,
1991, will be subject to a $30 per month parking fee; employees hired on or prior to that
date will be subject to a monthly parking fee of$15 beginning July 1 of the initial year of
implementation, and increasing to $30 July 1 of the second year of implementation. To
enhance the potential of meeting the SCAQMD requirements, the Districts will make a
reasonable effort to provide an incentive program that encourages employees to
commute by means other than single occupancy vehicles.
z000mors
tress 1 23
XLI. NONDISCRIMINATION IN EMPLOYMENT
Section 94. The Districts are an Equal Opportunity Employer, and do not discriminate against
any person in matters of employment, application for employment, participation in programs and
benefits, or in the application of rules and regulations with regard to race, ancestry, color,
religion, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, age, veteran status, marital status or mental or
physical disability or citizenship.
XLII. SEXUAL HARASSMENT
Section 96 The Districts will not tolerate sexual harassment in the workplace. Sexual
Harassment may include, but is not limited to, any of the following:
1. Sexual favors. Unwanted sexual advances which condition an employment benefit upon
exchange of sexual favors.
2. Hostile work environment. Sexually-based verbal, physical or visual harassment of such
a nature and intensity that it creates an intimidating, hostile or offensive working
environment. Conduct that may result in a hostile work environment includes, but is not
limited to, the following:
a. Sexual epithets,jokes, derogatory comments or slurs;
b. Assault, impeding or blocking movement, or any physical interference with
normal work or movement when directed at an individual on the basis of sex;
C. Sexual cartoons, drawings, photographs or derogatory posters.
Any employee who believes that he or she has been the victim of sexual harassment should
immediately report the matter to his or her supervisor or manager, or to any other supervisor or
manager, including the General Manager. Complaints of sexual harassment will be promptly
investigated, and appropriate corrective action will be taken.
Section 96, The Districts will not tolerate any other forth of harassment, and is committed to
providing a work environment that is free from unlawful discrimination. to keeping with that
commitment, the Districts maintains a strict policy prohibiting harassment based on race,
religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical or mental disability, medical condition,
marital status, sex, age, sexual orientation, exercise of rights relating to family care leave, or
any other legally protected basis. This policy prohibits unlawful harassment will be promptly
investigated, and appropriate corrective action will be taken.
XLIII. SMOKE-FREE ENVIRONMENT
Section 97. The Districts endorse and support the right of all employees to work in a healthy
and safe environment free of recognized hazards. In view of the hazards associated with
smoking, and the potentially harmful effect it has on the health and well being of Districts'
employees and their families, smoking is not permitted within Districts' facilities.
20WOW19
In66_1 24
a F iRF S 3, 4n' yt a '^5
kA 1 'Sn R s o tl"t an@,p13�RU.lt}, Ant9f to aD@ O;litd-$ }31ce6
ved{t p�a�slp „2.ieser�Gedby:�t��ra}�.,f{3ort7 .. p1o�' pirf�ment�sfeA�.��!
sjs
Id3p Pb�a W�flca4o�}' &�rt{p �flab clotplw"
y Ailp� ae payah�e C0 ¢ 5 ff9,8Ver�>343 SQ
� ��f >t�tFa aa�rsY'2'''��1ft1���t{a Ja cA(rf aoer�mpfton,Fr�a tRa'nJ�•s C Oe at�nLv,��alryne a��OT1t'�e.Ai�:o'r��o`„i t$�ih4�o!��Y>c�iapiaa1o"ft�b}rK�n+n s-aans7t v,io({ti,�tr6�,i�fa3�Br�INauI�oGfu}i i'b�ur0�s11?"cndRa
1asA}gsR fa44�A1?A€k$n 'f�uf�f{�`�ja�fSlhe,,S65e36.t,�t�r�.ry'flha;E�,�re'4f ",��,��h$::"�rOe�!er�'�tP. g"h':r�g
lfie��Or�'1p w#� � ss�o`"��'m 's� slhere(S{rtt9�ta��1l�sovrr�'7���iaYi.16'e
tnetp `y[y�� I re$t.tna"� met�a y�apawr�titte¢,tf '`�dA ".4
aiith` aa�t"' tQ;, asr�{�ie t"irrnef a Rire�a'"a°�itdlv,�,oip��Y�t �rt[Ns�`�:: '��t�y.
tt+r'a�+ nRda' .Rn ar��aG�a�ri�jam Rom" �Fv1l� at24L�,f m r�� 3"rp e
de'raStgrr�7n tiding Y halt I1Lr}t�q:t�4�}{a �,�" �1�dhtraR}r�patiarjcR�f�a�� � ptdmtsa
of atlt�ftC�' m`71.jsenal6ear-for�,��C��za odd{Q���.:Sa�rSiass a�I 4�f�b,�, a�g@
aOtY�'��`i��l�" h`eltwtesan�,p[oC�tlures,%R�a ,,, saeateattAl�'apro�R�tvi�irrei�;
diaR 91�,, ote �t � yais„�• �;@>1�'�e�rtpr�°iiK�,s�k�a.�e:
D1stNd15' 1s1�6 cftp �ar�'iar'�Cm�tYta{®su'.�,wfi}i shell t5e'p�4A ftlBF
anychang�',I�isa,,t{,r��n, _ .te���ryer'�pgippt�ardv�ille, eror�isc�s��r6
;1110161
1esb �e6Rfreoai fi�rs, nebas�s„ t.a p
red�ot�?A�F��ast,�,tet9sts,�at�e�str3c�s;,t�da�o
XLV. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
Section r,,,,86 't" The General Manager is authorized to develop and administer written Human
Resource pdiidias and procedures in order to augment, clarify or otherwise provide for the
proper implementation of the provisions of this resolution, and to authorize special adjustments
to avoid or eliminate inconsistencies which may result from a strict application or the provisions
of this resolution.
z000mole 25
maa_+
P1f6a1 A�le0ti" , Pfmna —we C
Sedioln 88 Resolution Numbers � .-7�z i and any other resolutions, minute
Mrs;'
or portions thereof "t Cdf s$piF %W-R a, that are in conflict
herewith are hereby rescinded and made of no further effect on the effective date hereof.
PASSkD AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Boards of Directors held this_ day of
yea_
25
I
i
i
I
I
I
i
i
i
i
i
It
I
Mini. A
0.ed. B.."
Ontu 30 A00 LOSS
Min 1 5 1 0 3 5 A Mid 3 9 4 0 4 S Mn
........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ..........
1000 7.1603 6.0031 0.3400 8.4769 8.113E 0.9507 SAM 9.434S SASH
3001 1L.2313 11.5634 12.9174 12.3135 13.4118 12.1124 13.3076 13.9131 13.9991
1003 12.5454 11.9591 43.3139 13.6964 14.0001 14.4638 14.8475 1S.3311 15.614E
1003 13.5231 13,9385 14.3132 14.7676 19.1833 15.5968 16.0114 16.4259 16.0409
1004 13.6166 14.03$0 L4.4l09 14.0601 15.2652 LO.7034 16.1195 16.5167 16.1538
LOOS 13.9090 14.3312 14.7973 19.1815 19.6091 16.033$ 19.4620 19.4881 L9.3141
i0O6 14.1934 14.6313 15.0612 15.4952 15.9290 10.3629 16.7167 17.2306 17.9645
1007 14.2091 14.1339 15.1616 15.5994 16.0371 16.4749 16.9136 17.3504 17.7881
LOOS 14.681E 15.1371 18.SB65 16.0358 16.4850 16.934E 11.3B38 11.8333 18.383S
1001 12.7590 14.2418 16.1346 17.2074 17.4903 LOAM 10.65S9 19.1381 19.631E
1010 1S.6630 14.3491 11.1354 L9.3330 17.9087 31.3054 18.7921 19.2607 19.1S54
3011 11.1919 11.6873 11.1B30 P1.6161 iSA744 18.6700 19.1651 19.4614 20.157%
1011 L6.6310 11.1405 11.6501 18.1S96 14.6913 19.1127 11.603 20.1178 20.7073
1013 16.4181 16.9203 17.4338 17.1246 19.4267 19.9388 11.4310 19.5331 20.4332
1014 16.9841 17.5061 18.0316 SB.5490 19.0705 19.5111 20.1123 20.6340 21.1562
1015 17.3412 11.4151 10.404% 19.9366 11.4570 11.1975 30.5319 21.0564 21.5988
1016 11.10/1 10.3417 10.7008 19.311E 19.0739 30.41S9 20.9579 21.3000 13.0420
L017 17.0110 18.3449 19.9108 19.4567 20.0029 20.5485 11.0944 21.6402 11.1862
1018 18.5701 11.1400 11.7091 20.3161 20.0411 21.4163 31.1054 33.5944 31.1139
1011 11.0099 11.6704 20.2550 10.6395 21.4240 22.00BS 13.5131 23.1116 23.7421
1030 11.1676 30.0837 20.6790 31.3159 21.0131 13.4442 23.0143 23.6604 24.3545
1031 19.61LS 10.211S 30.8215 21.4214 33.0214 33.6324 23.3314 23.8213 34.4313
L033 10.1311 10.11S1 21.3131 33.0111 23.6291 23.2471 23.6951 24.4031 25.1011
1033 20.3013 20.1232 21.5450 33.1661 33.7084 23.4104 24.0325 34.9S43 35.3142
1034 20.1336 11.3983 21.1931 13.6310 13.2636 33.B173 24.5320 25.1668 35.SOSS
1035 31.1004 31.9S31 33.6059 23.2587 23.9113 24.5442 35.1110 26.4697 26.5335
1016 31.3510 33.0360 23.1309 24.4051 25.0100 35.11SB 21.4607 31.14S7 31.0309
1011 19.1194 16.7333 19.3010 19.6454 20.4031 30.9195 21.5163 33.073% 33.6391
3000 9.1147 10.0141 10.3141 10.6747 10.9747 11.3146 11.S146 11.9746 12.1749
1001 10.3309 10.6463 10.9618 11.1171 11.5111 11.9081 12.3335. 13.5390 13.0344
3003 12.5199 11.9019 MUSS 13.161B 14.136E 14.S311 14.1067 15.2116 15.4710
1003 13.1611 13.1$31 13.5445 13.9359 14.3113 14.7117 15,1101 15.5015 15.8929
3004 13.2149 13.6191 14.0335 14.4311 14.8320 15.3363 13.1406 19.0449 16.4491
1005 13.3900 13.8001 14.2114 14.6131 13.0329 15.4434 15.9543 16.3650 16.6757
3006 14.3479 14.7149 19.3360 15.6650 L6.1041 16.5431 16.002L 11.41L1 L1.0603
3007 14.7313 15,1912 15.1431 16.0150 14.1400 11.9981 17.4501 11.1011 11.3S46
3000 16.1119 16.6116 11.1051 17.5004 18.0920 10.5051 19.0712 11.3713 20.0944
1009 16.3335 16.7115 17.2115 11.1134 18.2104 18.7074 19.2044 19.7013 20.1183
1010 16.6757 17.1668 17.4990 19.3001 18.7303 11.2314 19.7425 20.2937 10.7649
3011 11.7910 L1.3040 11.OLOO 12.3140 18.6490 10.3640 11.8110 20.3140 30.9010
3011 11.9602 18.4071 15.5546 11.5018 20.0490 20,5061 21.1433 21.6905 33.2311
30LI 10.4762 19.0447 10.9112 20.1111 20.7442 21.3107 21.9113 31.4437 13.0 L01
3014 19.1311 19.1139 20.3981 10.0945 21.4704 13.0592 32.6420 13.3310 33.0136
2015 20.1183 SCAM 21.4369 13.0562 33.61SS 23.2147 23.1140 24.3333 23.1916
BNielr A
Series s Salary Rep9ee
8isral Year 1995 - 1996
Range 05cR
No. Min nid eereancile Max
..... ........ .. ..... .......... ..........
8 1 .1.3010 i9.e021 21.S1NS 23.2243
S 2 17.3321 20.79e0 22.5607 24.3634
8 3 1a.0606 31.0231 23.7024 25.5016
8 < 10.9e56 22.1371 24.9131 26.8999
8 5 11.1314 24.0164 26.D3 28.1113
8 6 20.1118 23.25<7 27.4237 29.9921
8 7 21.981S 21.5473 28.8276 31.1080
8 0 23.OS61 27.8317 30.2314 32.1232
B 9 24.2446 21.2607 31.1900 34.3268
8 10 25.4033 30.6920 33.3363 35.1806
R 11 21.7101 32.2519 35.0225 37.9911
0 12 26.0774 33.1909 36,812. 31.72e3
S 13 29.4738 35.5795 38.6324 41.6852
8 16 30.1000 37.3177 00.526S 43.1153
B 15 32.4747 39.2060 42.5692 45.9340
B 11 34.1088 41.1133 00.6936 48.2219
e Il 34.3168 42.9034 17.1163 51.4900
8 10 38.0924 48.1200 53.9338 58.1476
8 19 39.4272 49.3063 54.2450 59.1853
0 20 43.2693 5IAM 50.0866 SI.692e
S 25 52.3231 64.6519 10.0192 71.9846
eznieit a-1
Administrative and Clerical
• Data: 29 AO0 1115
ORION.COOR . 300
Onion
Table Job dsade
Cade Md. Jobtitle Avtb Cade Min Nax Mn mi. NO NNK
300 1121 Fix TBCWRCIAN l Leis 17.8110 22.LB62 3.096.6269 3,945.1000
200 L227 SR ACCI CLERK 5 1004 13.6116 16.9538 2,310.2107 2.939.6587
300 1229 ACCT CLERK S 1002 12.9454 13.6148 2.114.5360 2,701.5653
300 1922 GRAPHICS COORO 1 sale 17.3452 22.5888 3.006.5013 3,742.0587
300 1924 DORMICE SVCS ANSI 1 loll 16.1916 20.1571 2,806.5440 3,493.0973
300 1114 SR 52ORESEESPBR 2 1013 16.4182 20.43S2 2.845.6213 3,542.1013
300 3916 STORBSRBBPBR 6 1003 13.5239 16.0405 2,344.2427 2,919.0200
300 2210 "MIN ASST 1 1012 16.6330 20.7O73 2.992.7067 2,509.2153
300 2225 SECRITARY 14 1007 14.2961 17.7081 2.471.2573 3,083.2707
300 2227 SR OFFICE AI0E 1 1004 13.9166 16.9530 2,310.2107 2,138.9587
300 2229 OFFICE AIOP 2 1002 12.5454 15.6148 2,174.5310 2.706.5193
300 2231 SR CI.071R 20 1002 12.3434 15.6148 2,174.5360 2.906.5653
300 2239 CLERK 5 1001 11.2373 13.9111 1.949.1907 2,424.2600
300 Sill INFO SVCS TECH III 3 1019 19.0859 23.7621 3.300.2227 4,118.7640
exblbie R-2
Engineering
Dace: 29 AW 1995
ONION.COOR - 900
Onion
Table Job evade
Code Code Jobcicle Aen C00e Min Mex Me Mln Ne Nax
900 3333 SR SNO MSOC 1 1026 22,3510 21.8306 3,916.1733 4,023.9707
900 3329 SN0 MSOC 6 1023 20.3013 25.2712 3.518.8120 4,302.2080
900 3236 ENI AIDE III 3 1015 17.3952 11.5999 3.001.5013 3,742.0507
900 3235 RMO AIDS II 3 1009 15.7590 19.1215 2.732.5600 3,401.0600
900 3236 END AIDS I 3 1006 14.1934 17.6645 2.460.1893 3.061.8467
900 3316 $R CONSTE INSP 6 1025 21.3004 26.5225 3.692.0193 4,517.2333
900 3317 CONSTR INSP 11 1020 19.0976 24.2565 31377.9507 4,204.4100
E Ih1[ a-3
Technical Services
00[e: 29 AM 1115
MW.000E . 100
OeioO
TeLla SOO 0[a0a
COO! 0000 SOO[SC10 .1h COOe ele MOx b Mi. ft IYI[
700 622) A SM' SPEC 1 10)6 20.7131 35.0015 3,512.0107 4.472.2600
700 621S OW SPEC II 6 2011 IS.S105 1).11)5 3.14.1560 4.004.0733
700 9117 SW SPEC I 1 1010 15J620 I9.7SS6 2.741A133 ).6)6.2613
]00 6516 BE L A YST 11 1019 U.5709 23.1235 3,218.1560 4.001.0733
700 6527 LN N YST 30 1010 1S.9630 19.7S54 1.169.4133 3.426.2113
700 6716 SOURCE C!A). XMP iI 19 1015 18.5701 23.1233 3.318.9S60 6.008.0733
ISO .110 SOURCE ML TECe 3 1005 13.1050 53.3143 2.410.2000 3.001.1952
SRAibit B•4
Operations and Maintenance
Date: 29 AM 1115
UNION.CODB • Sao
Union
Table Jab Dead.
Cade Cade Jebtitle Been Code Min Max Me is Me Max
Soo 1114 SR PLANT OPERATOR 28 2013 18,4782 23.0102 3,202.9880 3.908.4349
Sao 611E PLANT' OPERATOR 49 2008 16.2115 20.0144 2,794.0.67 3.411.0293
500 6214 PUMP POWER OPERATOR 13 2013 18.4782 23.0102 3,202.06.0 3,166.4367
Soo 6.97 CTAL C R CLERK 10 2002 12.5969 15.676E 2,183.4627 2,717.2173
Soo 7215 LEAD NORRAR 6 2012 11.0602 22.2377 31095.3680 3,854.5347
Soo 7217 SR NICE WORKER 8 2007 11.7313 18.356E 2,S54.8120 3,1B1.4660
500 0211 MICE WORKER 10 2005 13,3100 11.1757 2.320.9333 2.890.4547
Soo 7325 GROENDSKEEPRR 6 2003 12.7617 15,6929 2,212.0280 2,754.7693
Soo 7329 HEL➢ER ] 2000 1.7747 12.14.E 1.614.2.13 2,110.26.0
Soo 7332 MACHINIST 1 2012 17.8602 22.2377 31095.1160 3,054.53.7
Soo 7333 WRLOER 3 2011 11,1890 20.9090 2,910,0933 3,624.2261
Soo 9334 EQUIPMENT OPERATOR 3 2010 16.05] 20.76.E 2.990.45.7 3.599.2320
Soo 933S BUILDER 3 2009 16.2225 20.1983 2.611.9000 3,501.0367
Soo 733E PAINTER T 2007 14.7393 16.IS66 2.SS4,0120 3,191.46.0
Soo 961S LEAD COLL PAC WORKER l 2012 17.8102 22.2377 3,015.7180 3,854.5347
Soo 7617 Be COLL PAC MORKBR 9 2007 14.7393 18.3541 2,554.6120 3,181.46.0
Soo 7418 COLL PAC WORKER II 9 2005 13.3900 16.67ST 2,320.9333 2,890A54I
Soo 7619 COLL PAC WORKER I 3 2001 10.3309 12.65.E 11710.6813 2.226.0160
Soo 7525 LEAD 96CHANIC ll 2011 18.6182 23 A102 3,202.8800 3,186.43.7
500 7SV SR MECHANIC 23 2011 16.7890 20.9090 2,910.0933 3,624.2267
Soo 751E MECIRMIC 22 2006 14.3E19 17.8602 2,406.1613 3,015.7690
Soo 76I5 LEAD ELECT TECH • 2015 20.1983 25.152E 3,501.0387 4.351.78.0
Soo 7619 ELECT TECH II 9 201E 19,1271 23.813E 3,315.3640 4.127.6907
Soo 76I8 ELRCI TECH I 9 2009 16,2225 20.1983 21911.1000 3,501.0381
Soo 1115 LEAD INSIDE TECH ♦ 2015 20.1983 25.152E 3.SO1.0181 4,351.78.0
Soo ill] INSTR TECH II 30 2014 11.1211 23.8136 3.315.3640 4,127.6107
Soo 111E IBM TECH I 12 2009 16.2225 20.1993 2.811.1000 3,501.0387
• Eu.mit a -5
Professional
Gate: 19 SEP 1995
UNION.Caoe . 229
Union
Table Job Grade
Cade Code Sebeitle duce COae Mi. Ner No Mi. No Max
225 1112 OR PIN ANALYST 3 5 19.9314 20.1963 3,4S5.6429 4,007.3S67
225 1212 9R ACCOONTANT 1 5 19.9364 29,1963 3,4S5.6421 4,887.3507
225 1214 RCCC=ANP 1 1 16J710 23.2343 2,837.1400 4,027.2787
225 1114 PIN ANALYST 1 1 16.3710 23.2343 2,837.6400 4,027.2787
225 1814 ON OMER 1 4 16.1656 21.8881 3.210.8373 4,110.7427
225 1816 OMER 3 I 16.3710 23.2343 2,837.6400 4.021.270E
22S 2211 OR AGAIN REST 1 6 20.9169 29.$926 3,625.57e7 5.121.3640
225 2314 MANAGEMENT ANALYST 1 1 16.3710 23.2343 2.837.6400 4.027.2787
22S 2.4 CONEUCT ADMIN 1 0 23.0561 32.6232 3,996.390E 5.654.6890
225 3114 ENGINEER 19 11 26.7106 37.7931 4,621.8373 6,550.8040
225 3118 ASSOC I LINTER II 3 5 19.1364 28.1163 1,455.6427 4,001.3581
225 3222 PR ENG ASSOC 3 9 24.2446 34.316E 4,202.3973 5,968.2453
225 4114 REGULATORY SPEC 3 9 24.2446 34.316E 4,202.3973 S,948.2.53
225 4221 PR ENP SPEC 2 8 23.0561 32.9232 3,996.3107 S,654.6EE0
225 441S PRCJHC SPEC 1 9 24.2446 34.316E 4,202.3173 S,948.2453
225 4514 PR LAE 6 RES ANALYSP 7 6 20.9168 21.5921 3,625.9787 5.129.3840
225 4114 SCIENTISP 5 9 24.2441 34.316E 4.202.3973 5,948.2453
22S S112 C PPUTER HARDNARE SPEC 1 T 21.986S 31.1080 3.810.9933 5.312.0533
225 Sill TELECOMMUNICATIONS SPEC 1 ] 21.9065 31.1000 3,E10.9933 9.392.0533
225 5212 PROGRAMMER ANALYST B ) 21.986S 31.3080 3,810.9933 S.392.0S33
225 5214 PROGRAMMER 4 4 18.9856 26.0809 3,290.8373 4,160.7427
225 7812 OR MICE PLANNER 3 9 24.2446 34.3168 4,202.3973 5,948.2453
225 7814 MICE PLANNER 2 T 21.9865 33.108E 3,010.9933 5,392.0533
225 0114 RR ANALYST 1 2 19.2326 24.3634 2,981.9840 4,222.9813
22S 6212 SAFETY/EMRR RSSP SPEC 1 9 21.0911 32.1232 3,996.1907 S,654.6880
225 8316 SAFETY MEP 2 • tB.9056 26.8889 3,290.B373 4,160.7427
Supervisory
Oates 19 AUG 199S
UNION.MOB • 200
Mies
Table Sob a."
Coda Code .Pebtltle auto Mee Min Ms. Ne Mln MP IYN
_____ ______ ______________________________ ____ _____ ________ ________ ____________ ------------
200 1210 PR ACCOONIANI 1 9 24.2446 16.3140 4,202.3973 5.016.2453
200 1110 PR PIN ANALYST 1 9 24.1946 10.3166 4,202.3973 5,949.2453
200 1910 MARSHOOS6 SWSR 1 6 18.1851 21.8589 3,290.6111 4,660.7427
200 3110 SNUINSSRING SPVSR T la 30.9000 11.7151 5,314.0000 7,900.7953
200 3112 SR RNGMEA 6 11 29.6736 61.6251 5.109.7220 7,225.4347
200 1110 SWSR CONSTR IMP a 9 24.1666 16.2169 4.202.3973 5,949.2453
200 6110 SW MANAGSN6NI SNP 2 11 21.6119 41.6032 S.109.9920 7,225.4167
200 0510 LABORATORY SPVSR 1 12 26.0776 31.7211 4.066.7913 6.115.5651
200 1610 SR SCIENTIST 1 12 21.0771 31.7211 4,866.7191 6,585.5453
200 <710 SOORM CONTROL SWSR 1 9 24.2061 16.2169 4,202.3973 5.049.2453
200 6112 SWSR SOURCE CTRL IMP 2 5 11.9264 28.1143 3.499.6427 6.667.3527
200 6105 S0. OPSMTIONS SWSR 1 11 26.7101 11.1921 4.621.0373 6,550.9040
200 6110 OPERATIONS SWSR 12 S 24.2661 15.3166 4.202.3973 S,969.2651
200 6S10 COMPLIANCE SPVSR 1 12 26.0776 19.7262 4.866.1493 SASS.St31
200 7 10 MAINTEMANCH SWSR S 9 26.2446 10.3168 4,202.1972 S,946.2451
200 7112 FOREMAN 11 7 21.1945 11.1000 3,010.9133 5.312.0533
200 6310 SAFETY SWSR 1 6 20.9168 261926 1,625.5737 6,131 A910
200 6410 TRAINING SPVSR 2 6 23.0911 32,6232 3,996.3907 3.6S6.6990
Exhibit a-]
Executive Management
Date: 21 36P 1195
UNION.0008 - Lee -
Onion
Twle Job Grade
CO" COOe JnbtiCln Ruth Cade M10 Wz MO Min NO MR.
ISO 0001 aBNBPAL MANAGER 1 22 12.5000 62.5000 10.a13.3333 10,633.3333
100 0002 MST GAS MR ADMIX 1 20 43.2913 57.9924 7,900.0120 10,000.0110
Lee 0003 ABET GBN MR OPEM 1 20 43.2913 S7.6924 7.500.0120 10,000.0160
LOG 1000 DIR OF FINANCE 1 16 30.8924 58.1471 6,742.3493 10.217.5140
100 2100 SEC1Y TO THE a" VIA 1 SO 25.4033 35.9006 4,403.2387 6,236.6373
100 3000 DIR OF 6NGIMERING 1 19 31.4272 59.1953 6,834.0460 10,25B.1853
Lee 4000 DIR Of TECHNICAL, SVCS 1 19 39.4272 59.1853 6,834.0480 10,25B.7853
100 SOUP DIR OF INFO TECH 1 17 34.3166 51.4900 5,948.2451 8,124.9333
Le0 6000 DIR OF OPBGTTONS 1 19 39.4272 59.1853 6,834.0400 10,150.7853
LOP 9000 DIR OF MAINTENANCE 1 19 31.42" 59.1653 6,834.0480 10,258.7B53
100 $000 DIR or HE 1 17 34.3116 51.4100 5,149.2453 0,124.1333
Management
ONION.CODE . 17S
Union
Table Sob Grade
Code Code Jobcitle Ruch Cede Min Msx Ho Mib 6b Ass
STS OS00 COMNNIGTIOMS DIR 1 9 24.2446 34.3168 4.202.3173 5,946.24S3
175 Liao FINANCTAL AGE 1 15 32.4747 45.1340 5,629.1400 7.161.8133
175 1200 CONTROLLER 1 15 32.4747 45.1340 5,920.9440 7.961.0933
195 T201 ACCOONIZNG MR 1 13 29.473E 41.6851 S.106.7910 7,22S.4347
I75 LOUD NMCEASING MR 1 12 20.O774 39.7243 4,911.7413 6.005.5453
195 2214 PR MNIN MST 1 9 24.3444 34.3168 4,202.3973 5,940.1453
175 2221 ® =IVE MST II 2 1027 18.1754 22.6295 3.150.4027 3.922.5160
175 1223 ®2COTIVE MST I 1 1012 11.4310 20.7073 2.882.7067 3.S69.1653
175 3100 ENGINEERING MOR 1 16 34.1O00 48.2220 5,912.1920 9,358.4053
1T5 3300 CONSTROCTIOE MG 1 16 34.1066 48.2211 5,912.1920 8,350.4453
175 4112 SR REGULATORY SPEC 1 12 20.0114 39.7243 4,966.7493 6,995.5453
ITS 4300 BEN HAEAGE!®FI MR 1 16 34.1018 46-2218 5,912.1920 9,350.4453
1T5 4500 LMOMMRY MR 1 16 34.1088 48.2218 5,912.1920 8,358.4453
175 4600 CHIEF SCIENTIST 1 14 30.9000 43.7353 5.356.0000 7.580.78S3
IYS 4700 SOURCE CONTROL MR 1 16 34.1080 48.2218 5.912.1920 8.358.4453
1T5 flea NARIINARE SYS MR 1 11 26.7101 37.7931 4,629.6373 6,550.0040
175 5200 SOFZMARZ SYS MR 1 11 16.7106 37.7931 4,621.9373 6,550.8040
I75 6100 CHIEF OPERATOR 2 13 21.4739 41.6852 5.300.7910 7,225.4347
175 6101 OPERATIONS MR, 1 12 29.0774 39.1243 4,866.7413 6.885.5453
175 8110 NIX SWAP. 1 9 24.2446 34.316E 4,202.3173 5.149.2453
275 8113 SR HR ANALYST 2 6 20.1146 21.3126 3,625.5981 5.129.3840
275 B11T RR MST 2 2011 14.4310 20.7073 2,802.7067 3,SB9.2651
175 8200 BAFSIY/00aR MAP MR 1 13 21.4730 01.6852 9,108.7120 7,225.434T
175 8400 TRATRIMG MR 1 10 23.4033 35.9806 4,403.2187 6,236.6373
eaoiblt 8.8
Unrepresented
Date: 29 AM ills -
UNION.COOe 150
Union
Table Job DTsee
Code Cede Jobt"le Autn Cede Min Max Me Min No Mex
... ...... .. ..
,so 1190 INTERN 19 9as 9.2100 11.0000 1,101.8000 2,)73.]II3
Unrepresented
UNION.CODE • 999
Union
Table Job a."
Cede Cede JebCiale Autb Code Min Maa Me Min Me Max
..
999 ills STORE8RE9NR ABET 1 104 6.1E00 11.9853 1.071.2000 2,233,4520
999 2299 M MST 0 903 6.1000 10.SI87 1,071.2000 1,837.1080
999 1199 M A99T-SOIOpiR 28 $01 .0000 6.0000 .0000 1,040,0000
emisle e
Peaitlee evd Seletlq by Divlalm
Oats: L AOG 1$$5
Div. Job Aurb
COOe !010 Job Title Fo. Grade Salary Rugea Metbly "law Reamed
)150 0001 OSNBRN. PAKA05R 1.00 10 $12.3000 - $62.S000 10,9)).)))) . $10.8)).))))
2160 9002 ASST OW MR ADBIR 1.00 20 $91.)69) - $ST.6934 $7.500.0120 - S10.000.0190
21SO 0001 ASST GER NCR OPERS 1.00 10 063.26$3 - $ST.6124 S7.S00.0130 - $10.000.0160
)SSO 2221 EXE=Ive ASYl II 2.00 1027 $10.17N - 8)).1211 S1.330.6027 - $3.922.S160
1150 5.60
Giv. Job here
Code Code Job Title Fro Go.dd Salary RaeSea Marbly "law RaORee
.. ---
2110 1100 SEM TO TM BM OIR 1.00 10 $25.4031 - $3S.9606 $4.403.))07 - $6.))6.6)7)
2160 II25 SECRRTRRY 1.00 1001 $14.2061 - $17.7901 $1.676.2S73 - $3.083.2707
lied 1.00
Div. Job each
Toole Coda Jab Title Pte Grade Salary ranged W.ihly Salary Rae9se
..... ..... ...................... ...... ..... .... -------------------- - ------------------------
2170 E116 R DgRll AS 1.00 ) 524.1446 - $34.316. r4.101.1913 - SS.969.2e51
2110 1.00
Rctibit C
Position and Salaries by Division
Dee.: 19 8&9 lots
Div. Job Such
Code Cade Job Title Ft. Grade Selery Senses Monthly Selery Mass.
2190 0500 CORKORIMTIORS SIR 1.00 9 $24.2446 - $34.3166 $4,202.3973 - $5.940.2453
2190 2226 SR ADRIR RSST 1.00 6 820.916E - $29.5136 $3,625.5]8] - $3,129.3840
2190 1722 OMPHICS CWRD 1.00 lots $17.3451 • $21.5886 $3,006.5013 • $3,742.0567
2190 2228 ADRIR MET 1.00 3012 $11.1310 - $20.1013 $2,892.7067 • $3,509.2153
2190 1724 GRAPHICS SVCS MST 1.00 1011 $16.1916 - $20.i571 $2,006.S440 - $3,413.8973
2190 2215 SECRETARY 1.00 1007 $24.2061 - $17.7891 $2,476d573 • $3,083.2707
2190 2227 SR OFFICE SIDS 1.00 3004 $13.1111 - 811.1539 $2,360.2101 - $2,93B.6547
2190 9990 INTERN 1.00 as $9.2700 • $16.0000 $1.104-8000 - $2,713.3333
2190 2229 OFFICE SIDS 2.00 1002 $12.5454 • $15.6148 $2.174.5360 - $2,706.5153
2190 2237 SR CLEM 1.00 1002 $12.5454 - $15.1148 $2,174.9310 • $2,701.5153
2190 2239 CLERK 1.00 2001 $11.2373 - $13.9979 $2,147.7987 - $2,126.2190
2190 12.00
Div. Job Ruch
Cede Code Job Title Fee Grade Selery Range. Eenchly salary Rousso.
_____ _____ ______________________ ______ _____ _________________________ __________________________
2210 1000 SIR OP FINANCE 1.00 1B $38.6924 - $98.9471 $1,741.3413 - 810,217.5940
2210 1100 FINANCIAL HIS 1.00 15 $32.4747 - $45.9340 $5.628.9480 - $7,111.0133
2210 2320 M FIR AXAJUM 1.00 9 $24.2446 - $34.3160 $4,202.3173 $5.949.2453
2210 2223 ERECPIIVE MST I 1.00 1012 $11.6310 - $20.1073 $2,602.7067 - $3,501.2653
2210 4.00
exhibit C
Poeition am Salaries by Division
Date: 24 AM 1995
Div. Job Auth
Code Code Job Title Ft. Grade Salary Randes Monthly Salary Ranyes
----- ----- ---------------------- ------ ----- ------------------------- --------------------------
2220 1200 CONTROLLER 1.00 15 $32.4747 - 645.9340 $5,629.9460 - $7,911.8933
2220 1201 ACCOUNTING MGR 1.00 13 529.038 - $41.6852 95.106.7910 - $7.225.4341
2120 1210 PR ACCOUNTANT 3.00 9 $24.2441 - $34.3118 $4.202.3173 - $5,948.2453
2220 1310 PR BIN ANALYST 1.00 9 $24.2446 - $34.3166 $4,202.3973 - $5,940.2452
2220 1212 RE ACCOUNTANT 1.00 5 $19.1364 - $28.1963 $3,455.6429 - $4.887.3987
2220 1214 ACCOUNTANT 1.00 1 $11.3710 - $23.2343 $2,837.6400 - $4,027.2787
2220 1314 PIN ANALYST 1.00 1 $11 J430 - $23.2343 $2,937.6400 - $4,027.2787
2220 1121 PIN TECHNICIAN 1.00 1017 $17.8190 - $22.1862 $3,098.1267 - $3.845.1080
2220 1227 SR ACCT CLERK 5.00 1004 $13.1166 - $16.9538 $2,310.2107 - $2,939.6507
2220 1221 ACCT CLERK S.00 1002 $12.5454 - $1S.6146 $2.174.5310 - $2,701.5153
2220 20.00
Div. Job In
Cade Cade Jab Title Ft. trade Salary lengee Monthly Salary Sondes
..
2230 1800 PURCHASING MR 1..0 12 $28.0774 - $39.7243 $4,816.7493 - $6,885.5453
2230 L814 SR BUYER 1.00 4 $18.9851 - $26.0889 $3,290.8373 - $4,660.7427
2230 L910 WAREHOUSE SPVSR 1.00 4 918.985E - $21.9881 $3,210,9373 - $4.660,7427
2230 L816 BUYER 3.00 1 $16.3710 - $23.2343 $2.837,6400 - $4,027.2707
2230 1114 SR STORESKESPER 2.00 1013 $16.4L82 - $20.4352 $2,845.8213 - $3,542.1013
2230 2225 SECRETARY 1.00 1007 $14.2461 - $17.7881 $2.416.2513 - $3,083.2707
2230 1116 STORESKEBPER 1.00 1003 $13.5239 - $16.0405 $2,344.1427 - $2.111.0200
2230 2231 SR CLERK 2.00 1002 $12.5454 - $15.1148 $2,114.5360 - $2,701.5653
2230 L919 STORESKEEPBR MST 1.00 904 $1.1800 - $12.0853 $L,011.2000 - $2,233.4520
2230 18.00
exhibit C
PNleien eed Nleslae by Dlvlelon
Date, 2e AM LOSS
Div. all; ARM
Code Coda Job Title Ste Green 8e1ary Nage9 Monthly Salary Range.
..... ..... ...................... ...... ..... ......................... ..........................
2e10 5000 DIR OF IMM TOCM 1.00 17 614.116E - $91.4900 $9,946.2493 - $8,924.9222
gels 211e MAMMRMRM' MIALYST 1.00 1 $14.3110 - $23.23e3 $2,917.9400 - $4,027.2107
2e10 2221 gIRCOIIYB MST I 1.00 1412 $14.6310 - $20.0E01 $2,093.7067 - S1,5B9.265I
2610 3.00
Div. Job wth
Cade Cade Jab Title pt. Gtada saucy R9egee NNthly Salary "Meg
..... ..... ...................... ...... ..... ......................... ..........................
2420 5100 HARDWARE SYS MOR 1.00 11 $26.7106 - $37.7931 $4.425.8272 - $6,990.3040
2420 5112 COMPUTER IOMIDMAM SPEC 1.00 Y 511.9065 - $31.1080 $3,810.9911 - $9,192.OS11
2620 5111 TELECOMMUNICATIONS PPE 1.00 Y $21.9845 - $31.1O80 $3,910.99II - $9,192.OS33
2620 Sill INTO SM TECH III 1.00 102E SLO.0959 - $23.7121 $3.306.2220 - $4,120.79e0
2e20 i.00
Div. Jab .Roth
Code Cede Job Title Ott Otede Nlery Renge9 MMtbly Below Nngee
..... ..... ...................... ...... ..... ......................... ..........................
2e10 111e SMINT6R 1.00 11 $26.7104 - SI7.7911 $4,429.0372 - 56,SSO.90e0
20I0 8200 SO MME SYS MR 1.00 11 216.710E - $37.7131 /e,529.8271 - OC.550.80e0
2410 S222 PROGRAMMER MALYSi 1.00 l $21.9665 - $31.1690 01,810.9911 - $5,392.0811
2920 5214 PROGRAMMER 0.00 C $18.0056 - 026.968E 61,290.9171 - $4,660.7427
2e10 125E ROD AIDE II 1.00 100E $IS.7590 - $11.1213 $2,731.5600 - S1.e01.0100
2e20 2219 CLEAR 1.00 1001 011.2111 - 011.HTY S1,1e0.09e7 - 02.426.2690
2e10 17.00
RRhlbit C
9o.ition and Salaries by Division
Date: 29 AUG 1995
Div. Job note
Code Code Job Title Fee Grade Salary Ranges ...rely Salary Range.
2510 goes DIR or MR 1.00 19 $34.3110 - $51.0900 $5.908.2451 - $8,924.9333
2510 2223 S%SMIW REST I 1.00 1012 $16.6110 - $20.1073 $2,892.7067 - $3,589.2651
2510 2.00
Div. Job Korb
Cede Cede Job Title yte Orate Salary Ranges Monthly Salary Ranges
..... ..... ...................... ...... ..... ......................... ..........................
2520 $400 TRAINING NOR 1.00 10 $25.4033 - $35.9806 $4,403.2397 - $1,231.137)
2520 8110 MR SEVER 2.00 9 $24.2066 - $34.3168 $4,202.3173 - $5,946.2453
2520 $010 TRAINING S9V6R 1.00 6 $23.0561 - $32.6232 S3,996.3901 - $5,654.6880
2520 $113 ER RK ANALYST 2.00 6 $20.9169 - $29.5921 $3.125.5101 - $9,129.3040
2$20 $110 M ANALYST 1.00 2 $17.2326 - $24.3634 $2,186.9840 - $4,222.9413
2$20 $127 MR ASST 1.00 1012 516.6310 - $20.7073 $2,882.7067 - S3,509.2651
2520 2225 SECESCARY 1.00 1007 $14.2661 - $17.7692 $2,016.2573 - $3,003.2707
2520 2231 SR CLERK 2.00 1002 $12.5054 - $1S.6149 $2,116.5360 - $2,706.5653
2520 10.00
Rtlllbit C
9o.ition ani Sala[1aa by Division
Bata: 26 Ma 1115
Div. Job wcb
Code Cade Job Title Ste gram Salary ungae Monthly $glary singes
2510 9200 SAPSTY/2N3R 8$SP WR 1.00 11 $29.9119 - 591.6852 $S,109.1920 - $1.225.4341
ills 0212 SASBTY/EMIR MP S96C 1.00 0 121.0561 - $32.4232 $1.996A907 - $5,154.1880
2510 0310 SAFI= SMS1 1.a0 6 $20.9160 - 621.S926 $3.129.5187 - 55.121.3840
2510 8116 SAP$TY RSS 2.00 6 $10.9956 - $21.9889 $3.210.8211 - 56.660.1621
2510 ...I He MST 1.00 1012 $11.1310 - $20.7071 $2,892.7061 - $3.581.2153
2510 1910 INTERS 1.00 905 $9.2700 - $16.0000 $1.101.8000 - $2.773.3333
2510 7.00
Div. Job Ascb
Cade Cam Jab Title yce area salary Ranges lbncbly Solaty Boer.
..... ..... ...................... ...... ..... ......................... ..........................
1110 7000 DIR OF SISNT612MC8 1.00 l9 $31.4272 - 559.1051 $6,8I0.0480 - $10.258.7851
1110 ills @FINNU I.00 11 321.7100 - $37.7931 $4,121.0272 - 56.550.8060
3310 2221 B CVTIW MST 1 I.00 M2 $16.6310 - $20.7073 $2.802.7017 - 52,569.2651
I110 2225 SEC TMY 2.00 1007 $14.2911 - $17.7081 $2,676.2571 - 53.083.2707
2110 1190 IM'BR21 2.00 105 $1.2700 - $11.0000 $1,101.6000 - $2.773.2333
3310 2217 SR MERR I.00 10.2 $12.5959 - $15.6100 $2.176.S360 - $2,706.5153
1210 2219 CLBRR 2.00 1001 511.2311 - 511.9911 $1.9<9.7187 - $2.421.2660
2I10 10.00
Div. Jab Roth
Code Cade Job Title Ft. geode Salary Rage. Monthly Salaty Ranges
___
1120 7100 MAIM@gNCS FR 1.00 12 $20.0774 - 519.7243 $4.811.7493 - $6.065.5951
1120 7922 SR H CS 9LAMN0R 3.00 9 $24.2446 - $34.3168 $4.202.3991 - $1.969.2951
1120 7914 NTCR 9WDM8R 2.00 l $21.9865 - $31.1080 $1.810.9911 - SSJ92.0533
1120 6.00
' Rehibit C
PesitiOR .n0 Salaries by D1v1PlOo
Dete: 16 AIM 199S
Div. i0! fteh
Cade Cade iee Title Pee a.." Selety Ranee Nentnly "let, Revges
__ __ _____ ______________________ ______ _____ _________________________ __________________________
3330 1100 NAINSNRRCS MR 1.00 12 $28.0776 - $21.7243 $4.811.1693 - $1.865.56S1
3330 1110 IUIM'OIRRR SPOSR 1.00 9 $24.2666 - $34.3168 $4.202.3173 - $3.146.2453
3330 7112 P0R03W[ 3.00 1 S21.9865 - $31.1080 $3,810.1133 - $5,391.0533
3330 121S LRAO RORROI 1.00 2013 $17.6102 - $22.2311 $3.015.7680 - S3.859.5391
3330 7335 RMLDCR 3.00 2001 $11.2225 - $20.1113 $2,111.1000 - $3.501.0387
3330 7217 OR N WRQR 6.00 2007 $14.7312 - SlBd566 $2.550.8120 - 53.191.4640
3330 7336 PAINTER 7.00 2007 $16.7313 - $18.3541 $2.556.e120 - $3,101.4640
1330 1219 N WR93@ 10.00 2005 $13.3100 - $16.6151 $2,320.9333 - $2,810.4561
3330 7325 ORO KCEPER 6.00 200) $12.1117 - $15.8929 $2.212.0280 - $2.1S6.1693
3330 7329 RELPER 7.00 2000 $1.1161 - 512.1166 $1.614.2813 - $2.110.2140
3330 $2.00
Div. Job Ante
Code Cede Soh Title Pce Oeade Salae Ranges Monthly Salary Rages
..... ..... ...................... ...... ..... ......................... ..........................
3360 7100 MAIM283p MR 1.00 12 $10.0119 - $31.7243 $4,861.1493 - $1.9e5.5653
3340 7110 MASN2BIDWC$ SWSR 1.00 9 $26.2666 - $34.3168 $4.202.3973 - $S.140.2651
3360 1112 POROtAN 2.00 1 A1.9165 - $31.10SO $3.810.1933 - $S.392.0533
3360 161S LEAD W" PAC WORKER 1.00 2012 SI1J602 - $22.2377 93.095.16e0 - $3.856.S367
3360 7417 SR M" PAC WRWR 9.00 2007 $14.7313 - S1B.3566 $2.556.9120 - $3,161.4640
2260 1618 LOLL PAC MRPBR II 9.00 2001 $13.3100 - $16.6151 $2,320.1333 - $2.690A501
3360 1611 LOLL PAC RDRPBR I 3.00 2001 $10.3305 - $12.SS44 $1.710.1993 - $2.226.0010
3340 32.00
Zxhibla C e
Poeicioe W salatLea by Divieim
Dec*: 20 ROD 1999 -
Div. Jab .Rite
COGe Cede JOb Title yte 0eeae "law 6eeS*e MOeCbly Salary Ree$ea
_____ _____ ______________________ ______ _____ _________________________ __________________________
3350 7100 MAINTENAMCE MR 1.00 11 $28.0716 - $31.7243 $e,961.7493 - $6.96S.S951
3350 7110 MAIMPNANCE SPVSR 1.00 9 $24.1666 - $34.3268 04.202.3173 - $S.963.1493
33SO Till PoREN.N 3.00 T $21.1865 - $31.1860 $3.010.993 - $S,392.0311
3350 T91S LEAD MECHANIC 11.00 2013 $16.9761 - $23.0102 a.392.9840 - $3e88.4347
33SO Tlll HACMIMIST 1.00 3013 $17.5602 - $22.1377 $3.09S.1600 - $3.6M.5347
3350 7)33 WELDER 3.00 2011 $11.7910 - 330.9090 $3.910.0911 - $3.63e.2217
3350 TSIT St MECMDNIC 23.00 2011 $i6.7990 - $20.9010 $2.920.0133 - $3,624.3217
3350 7334 EOEIPMEM OPERATOR ).00 2010 $16.6757 - 020.7669 $2,010.4567 - $3.599.2120
33SO 191E NCCE M 22.00 200E $N-0479 - $17.6602 $3.166.1613 - $2,015.7680
also 18.00
MI. Job Satb
Code Cade Jab Title Ste S3Sde salew RaOSaa Msecbly ft"" Regae
_____ _____ ______________________ ______ _____ _________________________ __________________________
3390 7110 MAIMR3AMC S90ER 1.00 9 $26.2946 - $30.316* $4,202.3973 - $5.940.2453
3310 1112 90RtKAR 3.00 T $31.966S - $31.1090 $3.e30.9913 - $S.192.0531
3310 761S LMAD ELECT TECE 4.00 2015 $10.Dtl - $25.2521 $3.S01.0387 - $4,3S9.7640
3360 7617 ELECT TEM II 9.00 301E $11.1271 - $23.0136 $2,315.3940 - $4,127.6107
))60 7616 ELECT TECH I 9.06 2001 314.2125 - $20.1983 $2,811.1000 - $3.S01.0367
3360 26.00
Div. Jab A Wft
Code Coda Job Title ". Ot*sa salary Raoge6 Moeably Salty Ra -
IITO 7100 MAIRl6NANCE MR 1.00 12 $20.0774 - $39.7243 $4.666.7693 - $6.66S.59S1
))70 Te IO MAINTENANCE SPVER 1.00 9 $24.100 - $34.3166 $4,202.3173 - $S.M6.2453
3310 Till $0R61MN 2.00 T $21.965 - 131.1080 S).BIO J93) - 55.312.0533
))TO "IS LEAD IM R TECH 4.00 2015 620.1103 - 32S.1536 $3.501.0381 - $4.331.7640
3370 7717 INSTR TUCK II 37.00 1614 $11.127% - $23.9136 $).31S.)690 - $6.i27.6907
2370 7710 INSTR TECH [ U.00 2001 $16.2225 - $20.190 $2.911-1000 - $3.S61.0347
3370 27.00
Exhibit C
POnition and Salariee by Diviefon
Data: 24 ADS 1119
Div. Job Auth
Cade Cade Jab Title Pte GKRde Salary Rob$aa Monthly Ralary Ran9aS
_____ _____ -------------------- ------ ----- ------------------------- ____.___________._______--
3410 6000 GIR OF OPERATIONS 1.00 19 $39.4272 $59.18S3 $6,334.0480 $10,2S$.7853
3410 3110 ZVOINEERINC SPVSR 1.00 14 $30.1000 - $43.7393 S9,336.0000 - $1.960.9893
3410 6530 CONPL3ANCE SPVSR 1.00 11 121.0714 - $31.7243 $4,066.7413 - $6.SSS.5453
3410 3334 QIOINERA S.00 11 $26.7106 $37.7931 $4,629.8373 - $1,550.9040
3410 44LS PROJECT SPEC 1.00 9 524.2446 $34.3163 $4,202.3973 - $5,948.2453
3410 3117 ASSOC ENGINEER I1I 1.00 R $23.0561 $32.1232 $3,919.3107 - $S,694.6960
3410 9410 TRAINING SPVSR 1.00 E $23.0561 $32.6232 93,994.3907 - SS.GS4.6990
3410 3I1R ASSOC ENOINEER SI 1.00 9 $19.9364 $28.1163 $3,415.6417 - $4,807.3547
3420 2314 MANA98MENT ANALYST 1.00 1 $11.3710 - $23.2343 $2,837.6400 - $4,027.1717
3410 4225 RNV SPEC II 1.00 1010 818.5709 - $23.1235 03,219.1560 - $4,000.0733
3410 2223 9XICOTIVE ASET 3 1.00 1012 516.6310 $20.7073 03.902.7017 - $1,509.26S3
3410 1990 INTERN $.00 905 $1.2700 - $19.0000 $1,406.8000 - S2,773.3333
3410 2237 RR CWRK %.DO 1002 $12.5454 - 015.6240 $2,194.S360 $2,706.5453
3410 2231 CLERK 1.00 1001 $11.2373 $13.9977 $1.947.7987 $2,426.2690
3410 22.00
Div. Job Ruth
Cafe Code Job Title no Ono$ salary Ranee Monthly Salary RanRee
3490 6100 CKIEP OPERATOR 2.OG 13 $29.4731 - $41.6052 $5,104.7920 - $7,225.4347
3480 6101 OPERATIONS MGR 1.00 12 $20.0774 - $31.7243 64,966.1493 - $9,905.5453
3400 6Ia5 $A OPERATSONS SPVSR 2.00 11 S26.710i - $37.7931 $4,129.2373 - $6,990.E040
3480 6110 OPERATIONS SPVSR 12.00 9 $24.2446 - $34.319S $4,202.3973 - $5.945.24$3
3480 1114 31 PLANT OPERATOR 28.00 2013 $10.4792 $23.0102 $3,202.9980 - $3,169.4347
3400 6214 PUMP POSER OPERATOR 12.00 2013 $18.4762 - $23.0102 $3,202.9980 - $3,908.4347
3480 7334 EOUIPMENT OPERATOR 3.00 2010 416.4757 - $20.7649 $2.690.4S41 $3,519.2320
3480 6116 PLANT OPERATOR 41.00 2008 411.119S - 820.0644 $2.714.0467 - $3,477.0293
3400 6497 CPRL CTN CLERK 10.00 2002 $11.S969 - $15.6761 $2.193.4627 - $2,117.2173
3460 119.00
6Alblt C
Poe1C10e aa0 Salaries by Division
Der.: 2a A00 1115
Div. JOB Aurb
COEe Code Job Title yre DIED. Salary Range. W.Thly Salary RaO9O6
..
3510 6000 OUR OF TSCIVICAL SVCS 1.00 l9 $39.4272 - $59.1853 $1,034.0480 - 5l0.258.1853
3510 6112 $R SKALATORY SPEC 1.00 12 $20.0774 - $39.7243 $4.966.1493 - $1.485.5453
3510 4110 ESOOWTORY SPEC 3.00 9 $20.2446 - $34.3168 $4,202.3173 - $5,948.2453
3510 6225 ERV SPEC II 1.00 1018 $18.5701 - 523.1335 $3.216.9560 - $4,000.0733
I510 2223 EXECUTIVE KS$ I 1.00 1012 $11.6310 - $20.7073 $2,002.7017 - 51.589.2653
3510 2225 SECRETARY 1.00 1007 $14.2061 - $17.7881 $2,476.2573 - $3.083.2707
3510 9910 IIM1BRN 1.00 1.5 59.2100 - $11.0000 $1.606.8000 - $2.323.3333
3510 15.00
Div. Jeb SD.h
Cede Cede JOB Title Pt. Grade Salary RangeB RoetRly Salary Ra.Eee
_____ _____ ______________________ ______ _____ _________________________ __________________________
3550 4300 ENV MAMAOEPOUNT MLR 1.00 16 $34.1088 - $48.2218 $5.112.1920 - $8.350.4453
3SSO 4600 CHIEF SCIEMIUSC ..Do 16 $30.1009 - $43.1353 $5.351.0000 - $1.590.1OS3
3550 6310 RW MAE.W'HMOR SOP 2.00 13 $29.8130 - $41.1852 $5.108.1920 - 07,225.4361
3SSO 4610 S0. SCISIRIST ..Do 12 $24.0116 - $31.7243 $4.061.1413 - $1.005.5643
3550 3214 ENGINEER 1.00 li $21.7101 - $37.7131 $4.121.0373 - 56.550.6O40
3550 6616 SCIEWI9T 1.00 9 $24.2666 - $34.3118 $4.202.3973 - $5,949.2651
3550 3117 ASSOC SNGIWER III 1.00 0 $23.0561 - $32.1232 $3.111.3901 - $5,654.6800
3550 6221 PR EW SPEC 1.00 8 $23.0511 - 532.6232 $3.996J907 - $S.ISI.6890
3550 5223 SR SW SPEC 1.00 1024 $20.7231 - $25.8015 $3.592.0901 - $4.512.2100
3550 6225 EW SPEC II 2.00 101E $12.5701 - $23.1235 53.218.9560 - 64.008.0733
3SSO 4111 EW SPEC I 1.00 1010 SiS.6620 - $19.1556 $2.169.4133 - $3.424.2113
3550 2225 SECRETARY 1.00 1007 $14.2011 - $17.7661 $2.616.2573 - 53.003.2131
35SO 2237 SR CLERK 2.00 1002 S12.S4S4 - $IS.6168 $2.116.5360 - $2.306.5653
3550 16 00
ESAltlt C
POSitlen and Salatlee by Oillolon
Oat., 16 AM 199S
OIV. Job AntR
Coda Code Job Title Pta Gtade Salary Rat9aa Nentbly Salary Rana.
---- ----- ---------------------- ------ ----- ------------------------- --------------------------
3960 6500 LARORATONY NOR 1.00 16 $34.1068 - 660.22LO $5,912.1920 . 06,159.663E
3540 6310 LABORATORY SPVSR 6.00 12 S20.0116 019.106E 06.066.1693 • 06,065.S6SE
3590 461E SCIENTIST 9.00 1 024.2666 - $34.3119 64,102.3973 • 06,110.2453
3590 651E PR EAR 6 RSS ANALYST 7.00 6 $20.9169 619.591E $3,629.5797 • 09,129.1000
3500 6516 SR LAR ANALYST 11.00 Lois $18.5701 021.121S $3.210.9560 . 06,009.013E
3900 IS17 LAS ANALYST 10.00 1010 SIS.9620 019.19S6 $2.169.4133 . 01.616.2603
ISM 2225 SECRETARY 1.00 1007 $14.2611 - $17.7981 02,476.2571 - $3,093.2707
3560 22E1 SR CLERK 2.00 1002 012.565E - $15.9169 01,116.SE60 . $2,704.5653
IMP 2211 PT MST 6.00 903 S6.1100 - $10.3981 $1,071,2000 - 01,031.3000
3590 •67.00
Cie. Job Ateb
Cede Cede Jab Title ft. Evade Salary RMSae Nattily Salary Raryae
..... ..... ...................... ...... ..... ......................... ..........................
3590 4700 SOERCS CONTROL MR 1.00 16 $14.1089 - E60.2319 Q.911.1910 - S6,159.44S3
3590 3112 SR ENGINEER 2.00 1E $29.6130 - $42.6092 09.L60.1920 - $7,235.6101
3590 311E ENGINEER 2.00 11 $26.7106 . $31.7931 $4,629.6373 - $1,550.4040
3590 4710 SOURCE CKETTOL EWER 1.00 9 $24.1666 • $34.3163 $4.202.3173 • 55.900.165E
3590 3111 ASSOC SNGINEER III 9.00 9 $23.0961 - $32.6232 $3.511.3107 - 05,656.69E0
3510 631E PR ENV SPEC 1.00 9 023.OS61 • $32.6232 $3,114.3907 - $5,154.6440
3510 ills ASSOC ENGINEER 53 1.00 5 $19.9364 • $20.1563 SI.955.6417 • 04,867.3597
3590 611E EWER SOURCE CTRL IMP 2.00 5 019.916E - $20.2963 13,6SS.6621 - 94,097.1097
3510 6114 SOURCE =L INSP II 10.00 1016 $18.5109 • S11.111S $3,218.1560 - $4,009.0733
3590 ILLS SECRETARY 1.00 1007 $14.2861 • 011.7001 $2.916.2573 • S1,OE1.2701
3510 471S SOURCE ME, TECH 3.00 1005 $13.9090 - 611.316E $2,410.2000 - $3,001.1451
IMP 2237 SR CLERK 7.00 1001 612.569E • S1S.6169 $2,174.5360 • 01,106.565E
3590 2219 PT MST 1.00 103 06.1S00 - $10.9161 OL.071.0000 . 01,637.2080
3590 43.00
6NAiRit C
Position mC Salaries by Division
Este! 26 AM 1995
Div. Joe Auto
Cola COM, Joe Title Ft. Orals Salary Ranges NOacRly Salary ASR2a8
____ _____ ______________________ ______ _____ _________________________ __________________________
l>10 1000 OIR 09 INGIR$BRIM ..so 19 $39.5272 - $59.1053 $6.610.06B0 - $10.255.7853
1110 2014 COMl1AR ADKIN ..Do a $21.0561 - $32.1232 $3,116.3901 - $5,654.1880
1110 2221 QSCUTIV6 ASST 1 lA0 1012 $16.6310 - $20.7073 $2,802.7067 - $1.599.2651
3110 lase I21T8RR 1.00 as $1.2700 - $16.0000 $1,606.8000 - $2.773.3333
ITlD 6.00
Div. JOU WCL
Cots 000e Jo! Title Its Grade Salary Reo$es RmtAly Salary "as
____ _____ ______________________ ______ _____ _________________________ __________________________
3120 1100 BHOIRSR2R0 FDA 1.00 16 $16.1088 - $40.22" $5,912.1920 - S4.ISS.4453
1720 1110 M11U URIND SPab R 2.00 16 $30.9000 - $63.73U $S.136.0000 - $7,580.7853
2720 2112 IF MIN IR 2.00 13 $29.6718 - $41.1952 $5,108.7920 - $7,225.4361
1120 3116 BMIINBII 6.00 11 $21.7101 - $37.1921 $4,629.0373 - $1,550.0040
1120 1222 9R END ASSOC 2.00 9 $24.2446 - $16.3168 $4,202.1911 - $5.968.2651
1710 I117 AMW ENGINEER III 1.00 8 $23.0561 - $12.1232 $1.911.3107 - $5,154.1960
3720 1221 SR OR ASSOC 1.00 102E $22.1510 - $27.8301 $3,874.1712 - $4,823.1707
1520 122E E26D ASS 2.00 1021 $20.3013 - 529.2712 93,519.8920 - 06.181.2080
1720 3234 M AIM III 2.00 1015 S17.1952 - $21.SBaa $3,006.5013 - $1,162.OSe7
3120 3215 BM. AIDE II 1.00 1009 $i5.1590 - $11.1215 $2,731.5100 - $3,401.0100
1120 2225 SECRETARY 1.00 1007 $14.2611 - $17.7801 $2.476.2513 - $3,093.2707
1720 121E END AIM I 2.00 100E $16.1934 - $17.1145 52,660.1891 - $3,061.8467
1120 2211 SR CR.®R$ 1.00 1002 012.5455 - $15.6148 $1,176.S160 - $2.106.5651
3720 25 00
9
CChibit c
POaician am Salaries by Cis slon
pate: 14 AVG 1995
Div. Job aueh
CoSa Cme Job Title Pro Orate Balsry RM a. Monthly solar, Ra S.
------ ..--- ------------------------- --------------------------
3730 3110 BNOIN39RIN0 SPy3R 1.00 14 $30.9000 • 843.7353 $6,359.0000 • $7,500.7953
3730 3222 PR BND ASSOC 1.00 9 $24.2441 - $34.3160 $4.202.3172 - $9,146.2453
3730 3224 SMO ASSOC 1.00 1023 $20.3013 - $23.2762 63,519.8120 . $4,341.2000
1730 3234 BNG Arm II 1.00 1009 615.9590 • $19.6215 61,731.5600 - $3,401.0600
3730 2225 SBCRSTART 1.00 1000 $14.2661 - $17.7601 92,479.2573 • 93.OB14)07
3730 3236 SNG AIDB I 1.00 1006 514.1934 . S17.6445 $2,460.1913 . $3,061.8467
3730 6.00
pi, Jab ANch
C oa COOa Job Title Pte Orms Salary R9RSe0 Monthly Salmy MMM
..... ..... ...................... ...... ..... ......................... ..........................
3790 3300 CONSTRWIION NGR 1.00 16 $34.1094 • $48.2218 6S.912.1920 SB,359.44S3
3790 3110 SNGINBBRING SWSR 2.00 14 $30.9000 - 643.13S3 $5,356.0000 - S7,SBO.7aS3
3090 3112 SR BNOINSRR 2.00 13 $29.4739 . $41.9652 SS.IOS.7920 $7,325.4347
3790 3114 DOWSER 9.00 11 $21.7101 • $37.7131 $4,429.9373 - $4,530.9040
3790 3310 SPPSR CONSTA INSP 4.06 9 124.2441 - $34.3160 $4,202.3973 - $9.946.2453
3790 3316 SR CORM INSP 6.00 1025 $21.3004 - 626.S225 $3,612.0613 - $4,097.2333
3790 3224 BNG ASSOC 1.00 1023 $20.1013 - $35.2762 63.$19.6920 - $4,381.2060
3790 3319 CONS" IMSP 11.00 1020 $19.4876 - $24.2565 $3,377.9307 - $4,204.4400
3710 3234 5110 AIDS 11I 1.00 lots 817.3452 - 621.5996 $3.004.5013 $3,742.0509
3790 2225 86CRSTARY 1.00 1447 $14.2041 • 617.7001 )2,479.2573 $3,003.2707
3190 2239 SR CLQR 1.00 1003 $12.5454 - SIS.6149 $2,174.5360 62.706.5633
1990 •35.00
•.. 673.00
y JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
MEETING
AGENDAFOR
OCTOBER 25, 1995
Agenda Item (11)(b)(6): FAHR95-38 Consideration of motion
authorizing staff to solicit bids for a
professional services agreement for the
Financial Information System project for
completion of Phase III, Selection Process for Hardware and Software; and
Phase IV, Implementation and Acceptance of the Selected Hardware and Software
Solutions.
Summary
At the October 1994 Fiscal Policy Committee meeting, the consulting firm of Deloitte &
Touche delivered an extensive Request For Proposal (RFP) for the acquisition and
installation of a new financial information system within the Districts' Finance
Department. At that time, the Committee had decided to form an ad hoc subcommittee
to review the RFP and to report their findings back to the Committee. At the
January 18, 1995 meeting, the Finance and Personnel Committee made the decision to
have the consulting firm of Ernst & Young review the RFP in conjunction with their
review and evaluation of the Finance Department.
In their July 1995 report on the Finance Function Review, Ernst & Young
recommended a number of enhancements to the RFP including:
• Additional functionality requirements in the area of Project Accounting and
Cashiering.
• Expanded functionality in the Contracts Subsystem area.
• Functionality requirements for the Human Resource application.
Staff Recommendation
1. Direct staff to solicit bids for a professional consulting agreement for the
completion of Phase III, Selection Process for Hardware and Software, and Phase
IV, Implementation and Acceptance of the Selected Hardware and Software
Solutions for the Financial Information System project
2. Approve for release the Request For Proposal for a Financial Information System.
Distribution of the RFP will be made to appropriate vendors as identified by the
selected professional consulting firm hired to complete Phases III and IV.
JIWPWPBbMOBSOCiBS11B&CM
FAHR Committee Recommendation to Executive Committee
The Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee recommends the
Executive Committee:
1. Direct staff to solicit bids for a professional consulting agreement for the
completion of Phase III, Selection Process for Hardware and Software, and Phase
IV, Implementation and Acceptance of the Selected Hardware and Software
Solutions for the Financial Information System project
2. Approve for release the Request For Proposal for a Financial Information System.
Distribution of the RFP will be made to appropriate vendors as identified by the
selected professional consulting firm hired to complete Phases III and IV.
Executive Committee Recommendation to the Joint Boards of Directors
Consideration of motion authorizing staff to solicit bids for a professional services
agreement for the Financial Information System project for completion of Phase III,
Selection Process for Hardware and Software; and Phase IV, Implementation and
Acceptance of the Selected Hardware and Software Solutions.
J 1WPOLDBSVGRSWCIBAl1B9.LVR
fl
October 11, 1995 ..
' bm
STAFF REPORT
FAHR95-38: Consideration of authorization for staff to solicit bids for Phase
III and IV F.I.S. Consultant and Acceptance of F.I.S. RFP
prepared by Deloltte &Touche
Summary
At the October 1994 Fiscal Policy Committee meeting, the consulting firm of Deloitte &
Touche delivered an extensive Request For Proposal (RFP)for the acquisition and
installation of a new financial information system within the Districts' Finance Department.
At that time, the Committee had decided to forth an ad hoc subcommittee to review the
RFP and to report their findings back to the Committee. At the January 18, 1995 meeting,
the Finance and Personnel Committee made the decision to have the consulting firm of
Emst&Young review the RFP in conjunction with their review and evaluation of the
Finance Department.
In their July 1995 report on the Finance Function Review, Ernst&Young recommended a
number of enhancements to the RFP including:
• Additional functionality requirements in the area of Project Accounting and Cashiering.
• Expanded functionality in the Contracts Subsystem area.
• Functionality requirements for the Human Resource application.
These additional enhancements have now been incorporated into the RFP by Deloitte &
Touche and staff is recommending that the RFP be approved for release.
With the approval of the RFP, Deloitte &Touche will have completed Phase I, the Detailed
Needs Assessment, and Phase II, Development of Specifications for a Formal RFP, of this
F.I.S. project as contractually agreed upon. Staff will be providing this Committee with a
recommendation on the selection of a consultant for completing Phase III, Selection
Process for Hardware and Software, and Phase IV, Implementation and Acceptance of the
Selected Hardware and Software Solutions at the November Finance, Administration, and
Human Resource Committee meeting.
Background
The existing financial information system was designed in 1977 and has been modified
when necessary and cost-effective. This system's useful life cycle has expired and the
system should be replaced. Factors in support of a new system include limited processing
capability of the current computer and disk drives, the unavailability of the source code for
CS DOC 0 P.O.Be.8127 0 Faunlein Valley,CA 92728-5127 0 Tel. (714)962.2411 D FAX(714)962-3954
J
FAHR95-38
Page 2
October 11, 1995
the proprietary operating system, the lack of corporate support for the operating system,
the one-of-a-kind nature of customized software resulting in no support and no
enhancements, and the inability of the existing system to grow to accommodate new users
and applications.
The information needs of the Districts have also changed over the past 15 years as the
agency as grown. Flows have grown since 1978 from 191 MGD to 245 MGD, authorized
personnel have grown from 276 in 1978 to the current level of 664, and perhaps more
significantly, total fixed assets of the Districts, in historical cost, have grown from $229
million in 1978 to over$950 million.
Additional information system requirements are further demonstrated by recent studies
completed by Ernst&Young and KPMG Peat Marwick. Ernst& Young noted within their
July 1995 review of the Districts' Finance Function that no single issue arose more often
than the limitations of the financial information system and that the current system lacks
key functionality including a report generator, on-line processing, and the ability to
establish automated standard journal entries.
KPMG Peat Marwick's Internal Control Report dated June 10, 1995 concluded that the
Districts would benefit from an integrated financial information system that combined the
Human Resource and Payroll functions. Such a system would eliminate duplication and
ensure consistency of Human Resource and Payroll information. Their report also
mentioned the need for an encumbrance and dynamic job cost accounting system that
would allow for increased visibility of budgetary spending, and reduce the possibility of
projects exceeding budgets.
A summary of the proposed RFP is enclosed and will be reviewed at the meeting.
Professional Services
The process of acquiring a new financial information system began in February 1994 with
a professional consulting agreement with Deloitte &Touche to perform a financial
information needs assessment (Phase 1) and for the development of specificabons for a
formal request for proposal (Phase 11), for an amount not to exceed $150,000. The RFP
presented by Deloitte &Touche represents the completion of their agreed upon work for
the Districts.
At the outset of the planning for the new F.I.S. proposals were solicited from professional
firths to assist in the selection and implementation. The project was established in four
phases; Phase I - Perform a Needs Assessment; Phase 11 - Develop Specifications for a
Formal RFP; Phase III -Assist with the Application Selection Process; Phase IV-Assist in
the Implementation and Acceptance Process. After Committee review and
recommendation, the Directors selected the firm of Deloitte&Touche to perform the
Phase I and II work. It is appropriate now to consider professional services for the balance
of the project.
FAHR95-38 ATTACHMENT"A"
SUMMARY
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR A FINANCIAL
INFORMATION SYSTEM
vervie
This is a major systems development project to upgrade the core business
management information system. The three major functional or application areas that
are required to be fully integrated consist of the following components:
• Finance:
General Ledger
Cost Accounting
Budget
Accounts Receivable
Cash Receipts
Fixed Assets
• Materials Management:
Accounts Payable
Inventory Control
Procurement
• Payroll/Human Resources
Payroll Process
Human Resources Information
Additionally, there are hardware and technical system requirements that must be met.
In both the hardware and applications areas, the goal of the RFP is to obtain
mainstream solutions which will best fulfill our requirements for the next several years.
The RFP has been prepared in five chapters which are summarized in the following:
General Information
This chapter explains in general terms who we are, what we are looking for, and the
selection process. Included in this section is information the proposer will need and
matrix forms to be completed for one-time and ongoing software-related costs, training
classes and associated costs and for any modifications or customization required.
Copies of these forms are attached.
v
Attachment "A"
FAHR95-38 d
Page 2
Vendor and Product Profile Requirements
This chapter requires the proposer to answer a multitude of questions about the firm,
including the firm's previous installations, the firm's customer support and training
capabilities, their implementation support, their ongoing development practices and
policies, and their application version control system.
Technical Requirements
The configuration of the hardware environment will be determined by the software and
have not been predetermined. This section requires the proposers to identify the
hardware configurations that the proposed software runs on, the computer resources
required, the operating systems required, technology integration features, the future
directions of enhancements and technology and other system-related data. Proposers
are advised that we will give preference to Oracle based applications with a Windows-
NT interface.
Global System Requirements
This is the section of the RFP that addresses issues common to all of the applications
being proposed. These include issues like archiving, support for multiple organizations,
date and time considerations, tables and table maintenance, input validation, error
handling controls, reporting, function security, documentation and audit trails.
Aoolication Area Functional Requirements
This section is really three sections, one each for the requirements for Finance,
Materials Management and Payroll/Human Resources, and is over 200 pages long.
Finance
The General Ledger will be closely integrated with other financial systems, provide
validation for all transaction entries, serve as a central repository for all financial
transaction data, and meet the following objectives:
• All data maintained on accounts is accurate and timely.
• Provide flexibility to meet changing needs.
• Meet all statutory and GAAP fund accounting requirements.
• Provide effective controls and support of audit procedures.
• Allow local data entry and ad hoc reporting.
• Support budget vs. actual reporting, including encumbrances.
• Support modified accrual accounting.
• Provide on-line inquiry capabilities.
Attachment "A"
FAHR95-38
Page 3
The Cost Accounting module will support fund accounting and encumbrances, and be
updated from the same transactions that update the General Ledger, Accounts Payable
and Purchasing and will meet the following objectives:
• Retain cost data at user-defined levels.
• Retain cost data by project across fiscal or calendar years.
• Retrieve data on-line or in reports at transaction and summary levels.
• Access data on-line by combinations of project and/or activity codes.
• Support cost allocations per user-defined parameters.
• Use tables and algorithms for cost allocation.
• Support cost analysis at several levels.
The Budgeting system will enhance staffs ability to collect, process, analyze and
distribute budget data and documentation required to monitor revenues and
expenditures. The system will track each line item as it moves through the budget
process, support a multi-level approval process and tie into the review and appropriation
processes of the Board of Directors. The objectives of this application include:
• Preparation of Division budgets through on-line worksheets and approvals.
• Roll up of lower level budgets.
• Outloading information to word processing/graphical systems for final reports.
• Control and tracking of budget adjustments.
• Monitoring from various levels.
• Support ongoing monitoring of amendments after adoption.
• Provide different views of the consolidated budget.
The Accounts Receivable/Cash Receipts application will provide on-line entry of
transactions, editing upon data entry and on-line inquiry, and report generation. The
system will automatically match invoices and payments and support the recording of
customer conversations and correspondence. The objectives of the subsystem include:
• Increase productivity and reduce errors through matching and reporting
variances.
• Interface with Accounts Payable for refunds and adjustments.
• Capture and retain historical information.
• Support ad hoc reporting for specific problems.
• Provide electronic interface with Technical Services to enhance
industrial/commercial user invoices.
The Fixed Asset subsystem will facilitate tracking of fixed assets and other tagged
portable assets through the following objectives:
• Automatically generate tags for increased productivity.
•
Attachment "A"
FAHR95-38 u
Page 4
• Support ad hoc reporting for specific problems.
• Eliminate redundant data entry through interfaces with other applications.
Materials Management
The Accounts Payable application will be on-line, real time, tightly integrated with
Purchasing and Inventory Receiving and will provide data entry edits. The major
objectives of this module include:
• Automatic three-way matching.
• Acceptance of data from Accounts Receivable.
• Communication of pending items to other modules.
• Capture of historical vendor information.
• Support of ad hoc report generation.
• On-line processing.
• Validation of general ledger entries.
• Automatic preparation of 1099s.
• Built-in controls to prevent duplicate invoice entry.
The Inventory Control application will function in a multi-warehouse environment,
providing automated stock level calculations and automatic replenishment through the
creation of transfers or purchase orders. The system will be fully integrated with
Purchasing and will pass inventory transactions to the General Ledger. Following are
the overall objectives of this system:
• On-line update and inquiry.
• Complete integration with Purchasing.
• Improved inventory management.
• Identification of obsolete inventory.
• Support of hazardous materials management.
• Support of paperless receiving.
• Automatic purchase orders.
The Purchasing module will be an on-line, real-time application tightly integrated with
Accounts Payable, Inventory Control and the General Ledger in order to maximize data
integrity, reduce redundant data entry, and enable better use of information. The major
objectives of this module include:
• Decrease purchase requisition cycle time.
• On-line purchase order entry from requisition.
• Consolidation of requisition by vendor.
• Qualitative and quantitative vendor ratings.
• Purchasing history for all items purchased.
• Support ad hoc report generation.
• Seamless interface with RJN Computerized Maintenance Management
System.
b
Attachment "A"
FAHR95-38
Page 5
Payroll/Human Resources
The Payroll application will include timekeeping and calculating and distributing payroll
costs. The subsystem will obtain data from the Human Resources application
seamlessly, prepare checks and maintain year-to-date totals. Among the many
management and accounting objectives of the Payroll system are:
• Provide a single point of entry for all payroll hours, work order numbers and
leave hours.
• Establish platform for potential move to decentralized time/attendance entry.
• Maintain work-hour year-to-date totals for individuals and work units.
• Provide direct deposit option.
• Provide on-line review of employee work/leave hours, salary and deduction
information.
• Provide seamless integration with Human Resources, General Ledger, Cost
Accounting and Budget modules.
The Human Resources subsystem will include employee processing,
classificetion/compensation, performance appraisals, career planning, succession
planning, benefit management, and training and development. The system will be fully
integrated with the General Ledger, Payroll and Budget applications. Among the
objectives of this system are:
• Seamless integration with other systems.
• A single point of input for salary and benefit information.
• A training inventory by employee.
• Automated classification studies.
• Remote on-line inquiry of employee benefits.
• Integration of position control with Budgeting.
The RFP has been prepared by Deloitte & Touche after their completion of needs
assessment, has been reviewed by appropriate Districts' staff at various levels, has
been reviewed by Ernst & Young for conformance with their recommendations, and is
now ready to issue. The successful proposer will provide for benchmarking,
performance measurement and project management throughout the proposal.
GGS:Ic
J%WGWLlI=MN2FFC.M AHR BSISTA RP1UlTA W
Attachments
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
MEETING
AGENDA FOR
OCTOBER 25, 1995
Agenda Item (11 )(b)(7): FAHR95-40 Consideration of motion
authorizing staff to negotiate Amendment
No. 2 to the Agreement between County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11,
and 13 and County Sanitation District No. 14 for Purchase and Sale of Capacity
Rights in Treatment, Disposal and Sewer Facilities, providing for District No. 14's
annual flow to be based upon actual average flow per day for the four highest
months, and providing capacity for higher winter-month flows.
Summary
In September 1995, the staff presented an information report to the Executive
Committee regarding the status of the IRWD negotiations. In the meantime, staff
learned of the IRWD Wetland Water Supply Project through reports in the newspaper.
A review of the EIR for the Project indicates that, if approved, the IRWD will discharge
an average of 5 mgd to the duck ponds (and eventually into Upper Newport Bay) from
October 21 through March 31. The flow diversion could begin as early as January
1996, if the Regional Water Quality Control Board approves the plan at their December
meeting. Removal of this flow from the CSD system will have a significant impact on
each of the Districts. This report is intended to update the September 1995 report to
show the financial implications to the Districts if the IRWD winter flows are significantly
decreased. Because it is uncertain whether the Wetland Water Supply Project will be
approved, this report includes financial data based upon historic flows as well as the
financial impacts of the 5 mgd diversion to the Upper Newport Bay via the duck ponds.
Staff Recommendation
Although the financial impact is different if the Wetlands Project is approved, the policy
issue remains the same: IRWD should not be expected to pay 15 mgd if they are
sending significantly less flow. Therefore, staff recommends the FAHR Committee
affirm the Executive Committee's direction to negotiate a change to the 1986
"Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Capacity Rights in Treatment, Disposal and
Sewer Facilities" so that the District No. 14 annual flow is based upon the actual
average flow per day for the four highest months, providing capacity for higher winter
month flows.
b
FAHR Committee Recommendation to Executive Committee
v
The Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee recommends that the
Executive Committee recommend to the Joint Boards that that the Districts negotiate a
change to the 1986 "Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Capacity Rights in Treatment,
Disposal and Sewer Facilities" so that the District No. 14 annual flow is based upon the
actual average flow per day for the four highest months, providing capacity for higher
winter month flows.
Executive Committee Recommendation to the Joint Boards of Directors
The Executive Committee concurs with the recommendation of the FAHR Committee.
J1W PW PBSAGYvW CIBSIIB'I.CVR
n
September20, 1995
Revised 9127195
STAFF REPORT
FAHR95.40: Consideration of motion to change the "Agreement for Purchase
and Sale of Capacity Rights in Treatment, Disposal and Sewer
Facilities" between County Sanitation District No. 14 and the other
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Summary
In September 1995, the staff presented an information report to the Executive
Committee regarding the status of the IRWD negotiations. Subsequently, staff learned
of the IRWD Wetland Water Supply Project through reports in the newspaper. A review
of the EIR for the Project indicates that, if approved, the IRWD will discharge an
average of 5 mgd to the duck ponds (and eventually into Upper Newport Bay)from
October 21 through March 31. The flow diversion could begin as early as January
1996, if the Regional Water Quality Control Board approves the plan at their December
meeting. Removal of this flow from the CSD system will have a significant impact on
each of the Districts. This report is intended to update the September 1995 report to
show the financial implications to the Districts if the IRWD winter flows are significantly
decreased. Because it is uncertain whether the Wetland Water Supply Project will be
approved, this report includes financial data based upon historic flows as well as the
financial impacts of the 5 mgd diversion to the Upper Newport Bay via the duck ponds.
Background
The 1986 Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Capacity Rights was a result of the
formation of District No. 14. The Agreement allows a change in the method of
calculating the District No. 14 share of capacity in the joint works treatment facilities
after 1994-95, if agreeable to both parties.
Current policy provides for an "equity percentage" and amount to be calculated each
year for each Districts' percentage ownership in the combined joint works treatment
facilities including the interplant and ocean outfall facilities. The books and accounts are
adjusted and funds are transferred from the buying to the selling Districts. With the
exception of District No. 14, the equity percentage calculations are based upon the
actual total annual flows for the preceding three fiscal years. The original agreement
specified a District No. 14 flow of 15 million gallons per day. A specified flow was used
because all of the District No. 14 flow passed through the Irvine Ranch Water District
treatment and reclamation plant. Some of this flow can be diverted for agricultural uses
in the summer, reducing the annual flow to our plants, but capacity is required for the
higher winter months' flow.
CSDDC 0 P.O.Box 8127 D Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 0 Tel. (714)992-2411 0 FAX(714)982-3954
FAHR95-40
Page 2
September 20, 1995 ..
Revised 9/27/95
The Irvine Ranch Water District, which funds all of the District No. 14 financial
requirements, has asked for the 15 mgd minimum to be reconsidered. Staffs of both
agencies have met several times and have agreed that a change is appropriate largely
because the monthly flow has never reached a 15 mgd average, has exceeded a 10
mgd average only 8 times in the last 3 years, and the average daily flows have been 6.3
mgd.
Although the annual equity adjustment and subsequent Capital Outlay Revolving Fund
(CORF) budget contributions are based upon total annual flow for the other Districts, the
flow for District No. 14 is based upon 15 mgd calculation. A calculation is required
because the IRWD diverts flow for irrigation in the summer months. Since CSD treatment
plant capacity must be based upon the maximum flow that can be reasonably expected,
the very low summer flows in District No. 14 distort their fair share. As an example, the
percentage change in flows for 1994-95 from the average to the highest month for District
No. 14 was 244%, while the change for the other Districts was only 7%.
One of the other distinctions of the District No. 14 special relationship with the IRWD
relates to the CSD Reserve Policy. All of the funding needs of the District are met by
IRWD when the needs arise and most of the reserve funds have been kept and
invested by IRWD. This arrangement has caused District No. 14 not to participate fully
in the CSD Reserve Policy for long-term capital needs and for potential earthquake,
flood damage and liability claims reserves.
Staff of both agencies recognize all these differences as well as the needs to be fair and
equitable and to pay for facilities based upon use. After evaluating and discussing
several alternatives, the following working proposal was developed:
• The annual flow for District No. 14 will be calculated by multiplying the actual
flow for the highest four months by three to determine a twelve-month flow,
beginning with 1995-96.
• Proceeds from the resultant incremental sale of District No. 14s share of joint
works capital facilities to the other Districts will remain in the District No. 14
accounts and will be used first to satisfy reserve policy requirements, with any
excess used to fund future District funding requirements.
• Interest earnings on reserve funds will be allocated to District No. 14.
Current Situation
Had this proposed flow determination been in effect for the past three fiscal years, the
District No. 14 share of joint works capital facilities would be 4.58% rather than 6.31%
calculated on a three-year average flow. Starting to use this method for 1995-96 will
provide for a three-year phase-in of the lower equity share for District No. 14 and higher
shares for the other Districts. The one-time cost to the CSD of the change, based upon
FAHR95-40
Page 3
September 20, 1995
Revised 9127/95
June 30, 1995 balances, would be $12,062,000. Using the 1995-96 CORF budget as a
reference, the ten-year additional joint works capital improvement costs to the other
CSDs would be $9.514,000.
Implications of the Wetland Water Supply Proiect
If the IRWD can consistently divert 5 mgd during the winter months, then the future
capacity requirements for the CSD treatment plants could be reduced. Such a
reduction would reduce future capital improvement costs and contributions from each
District. However, if the flows are not consistently diverted and are sent to our
treatment plants, then capacity for both average and peak flows must be provided. The
costs for this additional capacity are shared by the CSD, based upon their flow-based
equity percentages.
The schedule and graphs presented to the Executive Committee have been redone
(attached) to show the potential financial impact on the other CSDs if the IRWD Welland
Water Supply Project is approved. Had the Project and the working proposal been in
effect for the past three fiscal years, the District No. 14 share of joint works capital
facilities would be 2.90% rather than the 4.58% or the 6.31% currently calculated on a
three-year average flow. The one-time cost to the CSD of the change, based upon
June 30, 1995 balances, would be $23,822,000. Using the 1995-96 CORF budget as a
reference, the ten-year additional joint works capital improvement costs to the other
CSDs would be $18,799,000, rather than the $9,514,000 which was calculated before
the Project.
Enclosed with this report is a copy of the original tentative working proposal developed
by staff. This working proposal includes historical flow charts for District No. 14 and for
the other eight Districts, showing the range of average daily flows per month. Also
enclosed are schedules showing the difference in future annual joint works capital
contributions and the June 30, 1995 equity sale and purchase, assuming the flow
calculation alternative had been in effect for the past three years with and without the
IRWD Wetland Water Supply Project.
All of the calculations in this report and the attachments are based upon historical
information. The actual flows going forward will be different and will result in different
allocations of CORF improvement costs each year and in different JWTF equity
purchases and sales. Should the flows in the District No. 14 service area increase at a
faster rate than those in the other Districts, then District No. 14 would be required to buy
back some of the JWTF equity and to contribute a higher percentage to annual CORF
improvement projects. The assumptions have been kept simple in this presentation in
order not to introduce error and to concentrate on the issue of payments based upon
use.
FAHR95-40
Page 4
September 20, 1995
Revised 9/27/95
Recommendation
Although the financial impact is different if the Wetlands Project is approved, the policy
issue remains the same: IRWD should not be expected to pay 15 mgd 'If they are
sending significantly less flow. Therefore, staff recommends the FAHR Committee
affirm the Executive Committee's direction to negotiate a change to the 1986
"Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Capacity Rights in Treatment, Disposal and
Sewer Facilities" so that the District No. 14 annual flow is based upon the actual
average flow per day for the four highest months, providing capacity for higher winter
month flows.
GGS:lc
J:W PDOCIFINICRANETFPC.MTGFAHR.QSlSTAFF.RPMRFAHR95.A0
Attachments
August 31, 1995
MEMORANDUM
TO: Distribution
FROM: Gary Streed�
SUBJECT: IRWD 15 mgd CORF Contribution Baseline Proposal
1. The Boards of Directors of the individual Districts will have to approve any
revision to the existing agreement
2. Use actual flow for 4 highest flow months times 3 to determine the District 14
flow for annual equity adjustments and annual share of Joint Works construction
requirements (CORF) rather than a fixed 15 mgd. Rain affects all Districts and
the equity percentages are a percent to total calculation, so rain days can be
ignored. Allowance for an increased use of the system by all users is already
included by using a 4 month average rather than the single high month.
3. If above used to determine the 1994-95 District 14 flow, the 6/30/95 equity
percentage would have been 4.58% rather than the 6.31% based on 15 mgd.
4. If 2 and 3, then the 6/30/95 Joint Works equity adjustment for District 14 would
be a sale of approximately $12,950,000 rather than the $888,000 sale booked.
5. If 4, then the other Districts would be required to transfer an additional
$12,062,000 to District 14. Districts' 1, 2 & 3 shares would total $8,978,000.
6. Over the next 10 years the other Districts would need to make additional CORF
contributions of$9,514,000 to replace the reduced annual CORF contributions
from District 14, based on the 95-96 budget
7. District 14 does not currently comply with the entire reserve policy of the other
Districts. The $12,950,000 above should be retained within the District to meet
these requirements.
Page 2
8. Reserve Policy Summary Actual 6/95 Per Policy
Operating dry period reserve @ 50% 866,000 1,066,000
Operating contingency @ 20% 0 426,000
Operating share of insurance 0 0
Capital reserve (share of$50,000,000) 1.982,000 3,155,000
Environmental (share of$5,000,000) 0 316,000
Capital share of insurance@ $150,000,000 0 9,465,000
Total 2,976,000 14,428,000
9. District 14 has a Reserve Policy deficiency at 6130/95 of$11,452,000 based on
above.
10. Interest earnings will be credited and will remain in District 14, reducing future
IRWD contributions.
11. All above estimates are for discussion and are calculated as if the change from
15 mgd had been effective for 1992-93, 1993-94 and 1994-95. Cash transfers
required will be phased beginning with the 6/30/96 equity adjustment in which
only one year's flow will be based upon the changed flow assumptions.
Distribution:
Donald F. McIntyre
Judith Wilson
Blake Anderson
Ron Young
Ron Zenk
Gregory P. Heiertz
Kathryn Beseau
GGS/
CDFLICF W O VIIMTEMP�ATEW EM W q W D.&t1
1015/95
MONTH TO MONTH FLOW TRENDS
35.00
- - ----- ----- -
_ ___ _____ __ _______ . . _ _____ __ _._________ .___________ _____
25.00 - --- --- . . . . . - ----- -- _--- -- - __ _ --- _ _ _ _--- -_ -----------------
20.00 _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ --- --- - _ - - - -- __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ _ ___ _ _
G'
J_
0 15.00 __ __ _ _ . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . ._ _ _. _ _ _ . - ------- - _ --- . . _ __ -- ----- ---------_ __________________ ____ __ _
4
10.00 _ _______ _ _ _ _ ___ __ _ _________ - - __ .____. __________ -_ .
5.00 ____ _ _ -- -
_ _ -- --- - --- - - - - -- _ _-------. - ------ --- - - - -- - ----- ------ --- ------ -- ---------------- _ . . .
0.00
g a y y p a y am m p n n n n
0 OI W � OI
11�1 gg '
O z o i o
Dist 14 Total MGD f Other 8 Dist
IRWC_FLW.XLS,CHART 3 7:17 AM
10/S195
Estimated Cost to Change District 14 Annual CORF Contribution From 15MGD to Hlnhast 4 Months
IRWD CONTRIBUTION
Vr Ended 15 MGD Hi 4 Month Cost to CSD No
6/30 Equity% 94-95% Other Diets 1 2 3 5 6 7 11 13 Total
1996 2,116,000 1,536,000 580.000 60,845 182,291 188,552 22,308 29,055 51,909 39,084 5,957 580,000
1997 4,737,000 3,443,000 1,294,000 135.747 408,697 420,665 49,769 64,822 116.812 87,198 13,290 1.294.000
1998 4,713,000 3.426.000 1.287,000 135,012 404,497 418,390 49,500 64,471 115.185 86,726 13,218 1,287,000
1999 3,775,000 2.745,000 1.030,000 108.052 323,724 334.842 39,615 51,597 92.184 89,408 10,578 1.030.000
2000 2,302,000 1,674,000 628.000 65,880 197,377 204,156 24,154 31,459 56,205 42,319 6,450 628,000
2001 3,437,000 2,498,000 939.000 98,505 295.123 305,259 36.115 47,039 84,040 63,276 9,644 939,000
2002 3,437,000 2,498,000 939,000 98,505 295,123 305,259 36,115 47,039 84.040 63,276 9,644 939,000
2003 3,437,000 2,498.000 939.000 98,505 295.123 305,259 36,115 47,039 84,040 63.276 9,644 939,000
2004 3,437,000 2,498,000 939,000 96,505 295,123 305,259 36,115 47,039 84,040 63,276 9,644 939,000
2005 3,437,000 2,498,000 939,000 98,505 295.123 305.259 36,115 47,039 84,040 63,276 9,644 939,000
Total 34,828,000 25,314,000 9,514,000 998,063 2,990,200 3,092,898 365.923 476,597 851,494 641,113 97,712 9,514,000
Dist Equity 10.01% 29.99% 31.02% 3.67% 4.78% 8.54% 6.43% 0.98% 95.42%
Dist%to Total 10.49% 31.43% 32.51% 3.85% 5,01% 8,95% 6.74% 1.03% 100.00%
One Time Equity Adjust
1995 (888,000) (12,950,000) 12,062,000 1,265,360 3.791.023 3,921.224 463,923 604,238 1,079,538 812,813 123.881 12,062,000
IRWD FL4.XLS 7:20 AM
1015/95
MONTH TO MONTH FLOW TRENDS
5 mgd Deducted From IRWD Flows November Thru March
35.00
30,00 - - -- -— - . - - - ' --- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - -- -- - - -- -- -"
25.00 - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - -- - - - - - -- -- - -- -- - --- -
N
J
LL
J_
F
g
10.00 - - ------ -- --- - - -- ------ ---- - - - - - -- -- ---------- ---
- -----------------------------—-------------
5.00 --- --- - -- - - -- -- --- ------- ---- - - - - -------- ---------- --
0.00 y C p 4 y y p p yy a
N N N VI Ol 17 Il 17 M1 !1 � 0 T P P P W Oi W O� T d W ONI N W W 9 0 a 0 41 0 ' 0 T y Jz � o O N ' d 0 W
a yr 0 Z o LL g $ f a� g z o LL f $ -, a m D z 0
t Dist 14 Total MGD Other 8 Dist Ave
IRWD_FLW.XLS,CHART 3 7:16 AM
1a5re5
Estimated Cost to Change District 14 Annual CORF Contribution From 15MGD to Highest 4 Months
IRWD Flows Redueed for 5 mad to Creek From Nov Thou March
IRWD CONTRIBUTION
Yr Ended 15 MOD Net Hi 4 Month Cost to CSD No
8/30 Equity% 94-95% Other Dish; 1 2 3 5 6 7 11 13 Total
1998 2,118,000 972.000 1,144,000 120,055 359,341 371,829 44,063 57,259 102.501 77,170 11.782 1.144,000
1997 4,737,000 2,180,000 2.557.000 268.340 803,177 831,091 98,488 127,982 229,103 172,488 26.334 2.557.000
1998 4,713,DOD 2.169,000 2,544,000 266,976 799.094 826,865 97,987 127.331 227,938 171,009 26.200 2,544,000
1999 3,775.000 1.738.000 2,037,000 213,770 639.840 662,077 78,459 101,955 182,612 137,408 20,978 2,037,000
2000 2,302,000 1,060.000 1,242,000 130,340 390.124 403.682 47,838 82,164 111,281 83,781 12,791 1,242.000
2001 3,437,D00 1,582.000 1,855,000 194,670 582.673 602.923 71,449 92,846 166,206 125,131 19,104 1,855,000
2002 3,437,000 1,582,000 1,865.000 194,670 582.673 602.923 71,449 92.846 166,205 125,131 19,104 1,855.000
2003 3,437,000 1,582,000 1,855.000 194,670 682.673 602,923 71,449 92,846 166,205 125,131 19,104 1,855.000
2004 3,437,000 1,582,000 1,855,000 194,670 582,673 602.923 71.449 92.846 166,205 125,131 19,104 1.855.000
2005 3,437,000 1,582,000 1,855.000 194,670 582,673 602,923 71,449 92,846 166.205 125,131 19,104 1,855,000
Total 34.828,000 16.029,OD0 18,799,OD0 1,972,830 5,904,938 6,110,159 724,081 940,918 1,684,359 1,268,110 193,605 18,799,000
Dist Equity 10.19% 30.50% 31.56% 3.74% 4,86% 8.70% 6.55% 1.00% 97.10%
Dist%to Total 10.49% 31,41% 32.50% 3.85% 5.01% 8.96% 6,75% 1,03% 100,00%
One Time Equity Adjust
1995 (888,000) (24,710,000) 23,822.000 2,499,961 7.482,709 7.742.763 917,552 1.192.327 2,134,412 1,606,942 245,335 23,822,000
IRWD FLB.XLS 7:20 AM
AMENDMENT NO. 42 TO
AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE AND SALE OF CAPACITY
RIGHTS IN TREATMENT, DISPOSAL AND SEWER FACILITIES
THIS AMENDMENT NO. 42 is made and entered into, to be effective this
day of , 1995, by and between:
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5,
6, 7, 11 AND 13 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, hereinafter collectively referred to as
"CSDOC';
AND
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 14 OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, hereinafter
referred to as 14".
RECITALS
WHEREAS, CSDOC and 14 have entered into an agreement entitled
AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE AND SALE OF CAPACITY RIGHTS IN TREATMENT,
DISPOSAL AND SEWER FACILITIES, dated as of FebFuaFy '", 1907
`,(the "Agreement") providing, among other things, for the acquisition by 14 from
CSDOC of capacity in the JWTF (capitalized terms used herein shall have the
definitions given them in the Agreement), modification of such capacity pursuant to the
Annual Integration Adjustment based upon actual utilization by 14 above CS llND;and
computation bf 14's share of the annual CORF budget; and
WHEREAS, Section 5C of the Agreement contemplated that after fiscal year
1994-95, if 14's annual flow did not exceed 5475 MG/year{15 hTGD , 14's CORF
budget share might be changed by mutual agreement; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 5C, the parties wish to make certain
changes in the method for calculating 14's annual CORF budget share along with
corresponding changes in the method for calculating 14's Annual Integration
Adjustment, in order to make such calculations M,consistent with the method utilized
by CSDOC for all of its other Districts; and
WHEREAS, the parties wish to make provision for 14's compliance with
CSDOC's reserve policy.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises set forth herein,
the parties hereto agree as follows:
Section 1: Annual Integration Adjustment. Commencing with the annual
integration adjustment made on June 30, 1996, the annual integration adjustment of
14's equity share in the JWTF and real property will be made as provided in Section 4 of
the Agreement, but the annual integration adjustment will be based upon 14's CORF
budget percentage computed in accordance with the revised method provided in this
Amendment. This Amendment is not intended to modify the criteria for the inclusion of
the value of real property in the annual integration adjustment, as set forth in Section 4A
of the Agreement.
Section 2: Budget Share. Section 5C of the Agreement is hereby amended to
read as follows:
"C. CORF Share After 1994-95. After fiscal year 1994-95, 14's share
of the CORF shall be that percentage of the entire annual CORF budget
derived by multiplying 14's actual flow for the four eenseedtive calendar
2aoo 14 1sz 2
�i
month§peeled of the preceding fiscal year having the highest flow fwsiFlg
aYeFag9 Daily IDFy WeatheF Flow fGF 8Ry Fain days) by three, averaging the
result thereof with the result of the same calculation for the preceding two
fiscal years, and dividing the resulting three-year average ("() by the sum
of the combined total average flow of all other Districts for the preceding
three fiscal years plus 'T', provided, that a flow of 5475 MG [57NRQ) as
specified in Subsection 'A' above shall be used for each of fiscal years
1993-94 and 1994-95 in computing 14's three-year averages which
include those years. Except as so provided herein with respect to the use
of said 1993-94 and 1994-95 fiscal years in subsequent three-year
averages as applicable, Subsections 'A' and 'B' shall not apply after fiscal
year 1994-95." [INSERT OR ATTACH EXAMPLE OF ABOVE
CALCULATION]
Section 3: Periodic Review of CORF Share. Notwithstanding the provisions of
Section 5C of the Agreement as amended herein, the parties hereto agree, on the
request of either party, to periodically review in good faith the appropriateness of 14's
CORF budget share under the circumstances then existing. A party may make such a
request following the third anniversary of this Amendment and at three-year intervals
thereafter.
Section 4: Credits to Reduce Contributions. Annual Integration Adjustment
payments shall not be refunded or paid to 14 but shall be held as a credit for the
account of 14 in the books and records of CSDOC, which credit shall accrue interest at
20 14 3
193W 1
return]setua ear "t1 �nn��nvstmeetss, ancaiCiroiedD;tt3
1rNe's @kite The credited amounts shall be applied first, to satisfy any reserve
share requirements under Section 5 hereof and second, to satisfy future contributions
required to be made by 14.
Section 5: Reserve Requirement. It is acknowledged that the CSDOC
reserves held with respect to 14 are not presently on a basis consistent with the
reserves for the other Districts. The parties agree that 14's reserves shall hereafter be
computed in a manner;, e consistent with the method approved by the CSDOC
Boards of Directors to be utilized for all other Districts' reserves. 14 shall contribute to
the reserve by means of a credit of its Annual Integration Adjustment payments to such
reserve until 14's reserve share is funded to an amount consistent with the reserve
shares of the other Districts. Except for the application of such credited amounts, 14
shall not be charged any amounts or required to make any contributions to fund such
reservesp(1' 1 ,« n¢(Tar eCe, ,e"Go` `"tteXtsts"tnLst@n
� W, .
Section 6: Agreement to Remain in Force. This Agreement, as amended
hereby, shall remain in full force and effect.
SW0.00014 4
19283_1
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed in duplicate in the
names of the respective Districts by their duly authorized officers, effective as of the day
and year first above written.
"CSDOC"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
By
Chairman, Board of Directors
By
Secretary, Board of Directors
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
By
Chairman, Board of Directors
By
Secretary, Board of Directors
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
By
Chairman, Board of Directors
By
Secretary, Board of Directors
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
By
Chairman, Board of Directors
By
Secretary, Board of Directors
moo- 14 5
MW 1
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
By
Chairman, Board of Directors
By
Secretary, Board of Directors
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
By
Chairman, Board of Directors
By
Secretary, Board of Directors
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
By
Chairman, Board of Directors
By
Secretary, Board of Directors
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 13 OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
By
Chairman, Board of Directors
By
Secretary, Board of Directors
zaao 14 6 .
is3 t
"14"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 14 OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
By
Chairman, Board of Directors
By
Secretary, Board of Directors
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
THOMAS L. WOODRUFF,
DISTRICT COUNSEL
By
TCAp1P.l Wl=5)
]OODD0014
lRaq 1
.y
i
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
r MEETING
AGENDA FOR
OCTOBER 25, 1995
Agenda Item (11 )(b)(8): FAHR95-41 Consideration of motion to
receive and file monthly investment report
and staff report regarding performance
monitoring of Pacific Investment
Management Company (PIMCO)
Summary
The purpose of this report is to provide the Finance, Administration & Human Resources
Committee with status information about the Districts' investment management program, and
the performance monitoring of the Districts' external investment manager, Pacific Investment
Management Company(PIMCO).
Staff Recommendation
This is the initial monthly report of the investment activity since funds were transferred to
PIMCO. While it is inappropriate to compare PIMCO to the benchmarks in the first month, the
report is necessary to comply with our Investment Policy. Staff recommends the report be
received and fled.
FAHR Committee Recommendation to Executive Committee
The FAHR Committee recommends receiving and filing the report and the supplemental
information provided at the meeting.
Executive Committee Recommendation to the Joint Boards of Directors
The Executive Committee concurs with the recommendation of the FAHR Committee.
J I W TT�1�'UG6510C1�11 BB.CYR
ti
I
Cp
October 11, 1995
STAFF REPORT
FAHR95-41: Performance Monitoring of Pacific Investment Management
Company
Backoround
As reported at the last Committee meeting, $293.1 million in maturing Treasury Bill
proceeds was deposited on September 7, 1995, with the Districts' safekeeping bank,
Mellon Trust, for initial funding of the Districts' external investment management
program, to be managed by PIMCO, the Districts' investment manager. The short-term
portfolio received $60 million, and the long-term portfolio was funded with $233.1
million.
Portfolio Structuring
During the month of September, PIMCO has completed approximately 75 transactions,
purchasing and selling securities to properly structure the Districts' two investment
portfolios in accordance with the Districts' Investment Policy Statement.
Monitoring & Reporting - Monthly Reports
Also during the month, staff has toured the PIMCO facilities and trading desk, and met
with the Districts' Account Managers at PIMCO to review ongoing performance
monitoring and reporting requirements. The attached sample Monthly Report is a
customized product for the Districts.
Monthly Reports will be available from PIMCO to the Districts after the fifth business day
following the end of the preceding month. Given the timing of agenda mailing dates for
Committee meetings, and availability of the PIMCO Monthly Reports occurring after the
mailing dates, the Monthly Reports will be distributed at Committee meetings. A
Monthly Report for the partial month of September will be prepared and submitted to the
Committee. Please note that since September has been a structuring period for
PIMCO, the Districts' Investment Advisor, Callan Associates, has recommended that
actual performance evaluation of the portfolios and the investment manager should
begin on October 1, 1995.
CSDOC 0 P.O.Box S127 0 FeunW1n valley,CA 52T2"127 0 Tel. (714)582-2tl 1 0 FAX(71q 552-555<
a
FAHR95-41
Page 2
October 11, 1995
Monthly Bank Statements from Mellon Trust, detailing portfolio transactions and account
balances, will also be available to the Districts for review by the Committee on the same
schedule as above. The value of the Districts' portfolios will be "marked to market"
(converted to current value) at the end of each month.
Staff is investigating the on-line reporting services available from Mellon Trust with the
goal of implementing an on-line system to enhance the Districts' investment monitoring
and reporting capabilities.
Monthly reports from both PIMCO and Mellon Trust will be forwarded to Callan for their
ongoing performance review and reporting responsibilities to the Districts.
Monitoring& Reporting - Quarterly Reports
Callan will prepare and present to the Committee a Quarterly Performance Report
which will evaluate portfolio performance and the performance of the investment
manager, using the duration and benchmark measures previously approved by the
Committee for this purpose.
The duration for the short-term and long-tens portfolios is 90 days and 2.5 years,
respectively. There are two benchmarks for each portfolio. The first is a Market Index
Benchmark which reflects the rateof-retum for investments with similar maturities. The
second is a Peer Group Benchmark which reflects the returns achieved by other active
money managers with similar investment objectives. The benchmarks are summarized
as follows:
Liquid Operating Monies
• The three-month T-Bill rate will be the Market Index Benchmark for the
short-term operating fund.
• The Callan Active Cash Fixed-Income Style Group will be the Peer Group
Benchmark for the short-term operating fund.
Long-Term Operating Monies
• The Merrill Lynch Government and Corporate one to five-year Maturity
Index will be the Market Index Benchmark for the long-term fund.
FAHR95-41
Page 3
October 11, 1995
• The Callan Defensive Fixed-Income Style Group will be the Peer Group
Benchmark for the long-term fund.
Staff will continue to develop and enhance the monitoring and reporting systems for the
Districts' investment management program, and will keep the Committee fully informed
on new developments.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that this report be received and filed.
JAWFOO4+FIMLIWhIFFCM GTMRA TWF.WMRFMM.41
MONTHLY REPORT
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING
(for the month ending September 30, 1995)
Liquid Operating Monies
14.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value: $
Historical Cost: $
14.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio:
Of Index:
14.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact (gain/loss) of 1% Change: $
14.1.4 REVERSE REPOS % of Portfolio in Reverse Repos:
(see attached schedule)
14.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY % of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days:
14.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality:
14.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING % of Portfolio Below "A":
14.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance"
14.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Portfolio Total Rate of Return:
1 Month:
3 Months:
12 Months:
Year-to-Date:
Index Total Rate of Rehm:
1 Month:
MONTHLY REPORT
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING
(for the month ending September 30, 1995)
Long Term Operating Monies
14.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value: $
Historical Cost: $
14.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio:
Of Index:
14.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact (gain/loss) of 1% Change: $
14.1.4 REVERSE REPOS % of Portfolio in Reverse Repos:
(see attached schedule)
14.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY Not Required for this Portfolio
14.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality:
14.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING % of Portfolio Below "A":
14.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance"
14.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Portfolio Total Rate of Return:
1 Month:
3 Months:
12 Months:
Year-to-Date:
Index Total Rate of Return:
1 Month:
QUARTERLY REPORT
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING
(for the quarter ending September 30, 1995)
Liquid Operating Monies
14.1.1 1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value: $
Historical Cost: $
14.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio:
Of Index:
14.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact (gain/loss) of 1% Change: $
14.1.4 REVERSE REPOS % of Portfolio in Reverse Repos:
(see attached schedule)
14.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY % of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days:
14.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality:
14.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING % of Portfolio Below "A":
14.1.5 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance"
14.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Portfolio Total Rate of Return:
1 Month:
3 Months:
12 Months:
Year-to-Date:
Index Total Rate of Return:
1 Month:
QUARTERLY REPORT
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING
(for the quarter ending September 30, 1995)
Long Term Operating Monies
14.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value: $
Historical Cost: $
14.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio:
Of Index:
14.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact (gain/loss) of 1% Change: $
14.1.4 REVERSE REPOS % of Portfolio in Reverse Repos:
(see attached schedule)
14.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY Not Required for this Portfolio
14.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality:
14.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING % of Portfolio Below "A":
14.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance"
14.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Portfolio Total Rate of Return:
1 Month:
3 Months:
12 Months:
Year-to-Date:
Index Total Rate of Return:
1 Month:
PROGRAM NAME: P10022 T R A N S A C T I O N J 0 U R N A L PAGE: 7
RUN DATE: 10/04/95 8131195 TNRU 9/30/95 AS OF DATE: 9/30/95
ACCOUNT NO: 203 County Sanitation Districts-Orange Co. BANK ACCT: OCSF0752222
CUSIP DESCRIPTION TRADE ORIGINAL FACE BROKER FACTOR COMMISSIONS GAIN/LOSS DELIVERY CURRENCY
TRADE NO COUPON MATURITY TICKET # SETTLE PAR/SNARES/CTY PRICE PRINCIPAL SEC FEE INTEREST B/S ISITC NET AMOUNT
-.-•------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BUY
171196ANS CHRYSLER CORP DEB 9/07/95 MLP DTC USD
21 10.4000% 8/01/99 A- S 9/12/95 1,500,000.00 106.8880000 1,603,320.00 17,766.67 1,621,086.67
090795 0109 ISITC
17120ONT4 CHRYSLER FIN CORP MTN OD 4/13/95 9/07/95 SAL SDI USD
23 7.2700% 4/13/98 A- S 9/12/95 2,900,D00.00 101.8240000 2,952,996.00 87,260.19 3,040,156.19
090795 0070 ISITC
-REVISION OF INTEREST*
17120OPYI CHRYSLER FIN MTN SER-P DD7/18/95 9/07/95 SAL SDI USD
7 6.2600% 7/20/98 A- S 9/12/95 1,000,000.00 99.3160000 993,160.00 9,390.00 1,002,550.00
090795 0071 ISITC
9850906A2 BOSTON RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT 9/07/95 ND USD
6 4.0000% 12/31/24 Al S 9/07/95 1.00 100.0000000 1.00 1.00
090795 1000
171200JJI CHRYSLER FIN MTN SER N 1/11/95 9/DS/95 GSC SDI USD
33 8.1600% 1/13/97 A- 9/13/95 1,500,000.00 102.3180000 1,534,770.00 60,520.00 1,595,290.00
090895 0100 ISITC
171200JJI CHRYSLER FIN MTN SER N 1111/95 9/08/95 GSC SDI USD
42 8.1600% 1/13/97 A- S 9/13/95 1,500,000.00 102.3300000 1,534,950.00 60,520.OD 1,595,470.00
090895 0100-6 ISITC
'REVISION OF PRICE
171200KH3 CHRYSLER FIN CORP MTN DTD1/31/95 9/08/95 DNR SDI USD
27 8.0800% 1/31/97 A- S 9/13/95 465,000.00 102.3597000 475,972.61 18,577.27 494,549.88
090895 0078 ISITC
17120OLT6 CHRYSLER FIN MTN SER-N DTD3/3/95 9/08/95 GSC SDF USD
32 7.3800% 3/17/97 A- S 9/13/95 1,500,000.00 101.47600DO 1,522,140.00 58,425.00 1,58D,565.00
090895 0088 ISITC
29348PAC8 ENOGEN MTN 8/7/95 PRIV 144-A 9/08/95 MLP SDF USD
43 6.7700% 8/07/00 A- S 9/13/95 5,000,000.00 100.167000D 5,008,350.00 33,550.00 5,042,200.00
090895 0082 ISITC
345402D21 FORD MTR CR CO MTN INN DTII/8/93 9/08/95 PRU SDF USD
24 5.9400% 11/09/98 A S 9/13/95 4,000,000.00 99.2620000 3,970,480.00 23,434.52 3,993,914.52
090895 0044 ISITC
3454D2HJ3 FORD NTR CA CO MTN FRN DD3/30/94 9/08/95 PRU SDF USD
29 5.4900% 3/30/99 A S 9/13/95 7,100,000.00 98.5880000 6,999,748.00 80,093.84 7,079,841.84
090895 0099 ISITC
-INFO SHEET ATTACHED-
Pay Codes: IS' indicates SETTLED, ,e, indicates UNSETTLED
PROGRAM NAME: PI0022 T R A N 5 A C I I 0 N J O U R N A L PAGE: 2
RUN DATE: 10/04/95 8/31/95 THRU 9/30/95 AS OF DATE: 9/30/95
ACCOUNT NO: 203 County Sanitation Districts-Orange Co. BANK ACCT: OCSF0752222
CUSIP DESCRIPTION TRADE ORIGINAL FACE BROKER FACTOR COMMISSIONS GAIN/LOSS DELIVERY CURRENCY
TRADE NO COUPON MATURITY TICKET B SETTLE PAR/SNARES/DTY PRICE PRINCIPAL SEC FEE INTEREST B/S ISITC NET AMOUNT
..........................................................................................................................................................
BUY
436904API HOME SAVINGS OF AMERICA SUB MT 9/08/95 PRU DTC USD
25 10.5000% 6/12/97 A- . S 9/13/95 1,750,000.00 102.1128000 1,786,974.00 46,447.92 1,833,421.92
090895 0045 ISITC
524909ADO LEHMAN BROS INC SR SUB NOTE 9/08/95 PRU SDF USD
26 7.0000% 5/15/97 A S 9/13/95 1,000,DOO.00 100.7520000 1,007,520.00 22,944.44 1,030,464.44
090895 OOB1 ISITC
718154BB2 PHILIP MORRIS DEB 9/08/95 NBC DTC USD
28 9.2500% 2/15/00 A S 9/13/95 4,000,OOD.00 110.0120000 4,400,480.00 28,777.78 4,429,257.78
09DB95 0094 ISITC
912794T38 U S TREASURY BILLS 9/08/95 FOB 5.69000000 FBE USD
14 5.6900% 9/21/95 AAA S 9/08/95 50,000,000.00 99.7945277 49,897,263.89 49,897,263.89
090895 0040 ISITC
'CONFIRMATION ONLY'
912794738 U S TREASURY BILLS Satins FOB 5.69000000 FBE USO
15 5.6900% 9/21/95 AAA S 9/08/95 11,000,000.00 99.7945277 10,977,398.06 10,977,398.06
090895 0040 ISITC
'CONFIRMATION ONLY'
AS151206A ASSOC CORP OF NO AMERICA DISC NT 9/08/95 DIR PHY USD
10 5.6800% 12/06/95 Al. S 9/08/95 11,500,000.00 98.5957777 11,338,514.44 11,338,514.44
090895 0003-A ISITC
-CONFIRMATION ONLY' NOTE: PHYSICAL PEKES: 2N5MM, TN 1NM, 1N500K
FN150911A F H L M C DISC MT- 9/08/95 GSC FBE USD
18 5.5800% 9/11/95 A1- S 9/08/95 46,000,000.00 99.9535000 45,979,610.00 45,978,610.00
090895 0042 ISITC
'CONFIRMATION ONLY' NOTE: CUSIP 313396LP6
FNI51103A F N N A DISC HT' 9/08/95 MLP FBE USD
16 5.5800% 11/03/95 AT+ 5 9/08195 46,000,000.00 99.1320000 45,600,720.00 45,600,720.00
D90895 0041 ISITC
'CONFIRMATION ONLY' NOTE: CUSIP 313588NU5
ON151208A ONTARIO HYDRO DISC NT 9/08/95 DOM PRY USD
11 5.6600% 12/08/95 AT- S 9/08/95 11,OOD,000.00 98.5692778 10,842,620.56 10,842,620.56
090895 0006-A ISITC
'CONFIRMATION ONLY'
UTR509118 U S TREASURY REPO 9/08195 SLH FBE USD
19 5.7300% 9/11/95 AAA S 9108/95 46,000,000.00 100.0000000 46,000,000.00 46,000,000.00
090895 D005-A
'CONFIRMATION ONLY' NOTE: COLL. 9128271199 23.4MM VS 22.635MM
912827NT5 23.205MN VS 23.365MM
Pay Codes: $S' indicates SETTLED, 1'1 Indicates UNSETTLED
PROGRAM NAME: P10022 T R A N S A C T I O N J O U R N A L PAGE: 3
RUN DATE: 10/04/95 8/31/95 TNRU 9/30/95 AS OF DATE: 9/30/95
ACCOUNT NO: 203 County Sanitation Districts-Dran9e Co. BANK ACCT: OCSF0752222
CUSIP DESCRIPTION TRADE ORIGINAL FACE BROKER FACTOR COMMISSIONS GAIN/LOSS DELIVERY CURRENCY
TRADE NO COUPON MATURITY TICKET p SETTLE PAR/SNARES/OTY PRICE PRINCIPAL SEC FEE INTEREST B/S ISITC NET AMOUNT
..........................................................................................................................................................
BLy
WA151006A WAL-MART STORES DISC NT- 9/08195 JPM SDP USD
12 5.71002 10/06/95 A1' S 9/08/95 11,500,000.00 99.5558888 11,448,927.22 11,448,927.22
'CONFIRMATION ONLY' 090B95 0004-e NOTE: CUSIP 93114BN65 ISITC
912794T38 U S TREASURY BILLS 9/11/95 FOB 5.70000000 THE USD
38 5.7D00% 9/21/95 AAA S 9/11/95 50,000,000.00 99.8416666 49,920,833.33 09119s 0001 49,920,833.33
-CONFIRMATION ONLY' ISITC
912794T38 U S TREASURY BILLS 9/11/95 FOB 5.70000000 FEE USD
39 5.7000% 9/21/95 AAA S 9/11/95 9,400,000.00 99.8416666 9,385,116.67 091195 0001 9,385,116.67
'CONFIRMATION ONLY' ISITC
UTR50912A U S TREASURY REPO 9/11/95 DAI THE USD
40 5.7500% 9/12/95 AAA S 9/11/95 32,500,000.00 100.0000000 32,500,000.00 32,500,000.00
091195 0007
'CONFIRMATION ONLY' NOTE: LOLL. 23.060MM 912810pM8
UTR50913B U S TREASURY REPO 9/12/95 SLR FBE USD
49 5.7000% 9/13/95 AAA S 9/12/95 29,400,000.00 100.0000000 29,400,000.00 29,400,000.00
091295 0010
'CONFIRMATION ONLY* NOTE: COLLATERAL- 26.610MM 912827R87
N9ISIIIOA NEW SOUTH WALES THY CORP BBC MT' 9/13/95 HAS SDF USD
52 5.6600% 11/10/95 AT- S 9/13/95 5,500,000.00 99.u881111 5,449,846.11 5,449,346.11
091395 ODOR-B
ISITC
'CONFIRMATION ONLY* NOTE: CUSIP: 648BOKYA8
UTM509146 U S TREASURY REPO 9/13/95 DAI FBE USD
53 5.7800% 9/14/95 AAA S 9/13/95 6,600,000.00 100.0000000 6,60Do OOO.00 6,600,000.00
091395 0009-B
'CONFIRMATION ONLY' NOTE: COLLATERAL= 6.23OMN 912827S29
OT951212A QUEENSLAND TSY CORP DISC NT' 9/14/95 MLP SDF USD
58 5.6300% 12/12/95 AT- S 9114/95 400,000.00 98.6081400 394,432.56 394,432.56
091495 0004 ISITC
-CONFIRMATION ONLY' NOTE: CUSIP: 74830S2C6
37042RK04 GEN MTR ALL CORP MTN DTD1/10/95 9/18/95 JPM SDF USD
65 8.6250% 1110/00 A- S 9/21/95 3,000,000.00 107.5690000 3,227,070.00 122,187.50 3,349,257.50
091895 D082
ISITC
37042RPM8 GEN MTRS ACC CORP MTN 2/3/95 9/18/95 JPM HOF USD
66 8.3750% 2/03/99 A- S 9121/95 3,700,000.00 105.7200000 3,911,640.00 146,329.86 4,057,969.96
091895 0083
ISITC
Pay Codes: IS' indicates SETTLED, I" indicates UNSETTLED
PROGRAM NAME: P10022 T R A N S A C T 1 0 N J O U R N A L PAGE: 4
RUN DATE: 10/04/95 8/31/95 THRU 9/30/95 AS OF DATE: 9/30/95
ACCOUNT NO: 203 County Sanitation Districts-Orange Co. BANK ACCT: OCSF0752222
CUSIP DESCRIPTION TRADE ORIGINAL FACE BROKER FACTOR COMMISSIONS GAIN/LOSS DELIVERY CURRENCY
TRADE NO COUPON MATURITY TICKET N SETTLE PAN/SNARES/OTY PRICE PRINCIPAL SEC FEE INTEREST B/S ISITC NET AMOUNT
.......................................... ..--------------------.-___----.__-.._..__..-__-_.__........_..___---_....__------_..._____-_._.._-
BUY
71815411112 PMILIP MORRIS DEB 9/18/95 PRU OTC USD
63 9.2500% 2/15100 A 5 9/21/95 5,000,000.00 110.0660000 5,503,300.00 46,250.00 5,549,550.00
091895 0084 ISITC
81238XUJS SEARS ROEBUCK CO MTN DID 2/28/95 9/18/95 MSC SDI USD
64 7.6900% 2/27/98 A 5 9/21/95 1,000,000.00 103.1860000 1,031,860.00 36,313.89 1,068,173.89
091895 0087 ISITC
31359CBN6 FNMA SR UNSUR BD 9/20/95 MLP THE USD
67 6.8500% 5/26/00 AAA S 9/21/95 25,000,000.00 101.4062500 25,351,562.50 547,048.61 25,898,611.11
09209S 0033 ISITC
• U R G E N T '
FN151215A I N L M C DISC NT* 9/21/95 GSC FBE USD
70 5.4700% 12/15/95 AT- S 9/21/95 1,500,D00.00 98.708472E 1,480,627.08 1,480,627.08
092195 0019 ISITC
-CONFIRMATION ONLY' NOTE: CUSIP: 3133969016
FH151215A F H L M C DISC NT- 9/21/95 GSC FBE USD
71 5.470U% 12/18/95 A1• S 9/21/95 22,000,000.00 98.6628589 21,705,835.56 21,705,835.56
092195 0020 ISITC
*CONFIRMATION ONLY' NOTE: CUSIP 3133960R7
FL151023A FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK DISC NT• 9/21/95 FOS FBE USD
69 5.5700% 10/23/95 Al S 9/21/95 44,000,000.00 99.504888E 43,782,151.11 43,782,151.11
092195 0001 ISITC
-CONFIRMATION ONLY* NOTE: CUSIP: 313384NN8
UTR5D922A U S TREASURY REPO 9/21/95 MLP THE USD
72 5.6000% 9/22/95 AAA S 9/21/95 18,700,000.00 100.000DD00 18,700,000.00 15,700,000.00
092195 0024-C
-CONFIRMATION ONLY' NOTE: COLLATERAL:.CUSIP 912827594, FACE 18,700,000
UTR50925A U S TREASURY REPO 9/22/95 FCN FBE USD
76 5.5700% 9125/95 AAA S 9/22/95 13,200,000.DO 100.0000000 13,2OD,000.00 13,200,000.00
092295 0002-8
-CONFIRMATION ONLY' NOTE: COLL: 912827U91 13.385M
AT151103D AMERICAN TELEPHONE 8 TEL DIS NT' 9/25/95 MLP SDI USD
80 5.7200% 11/03/95 A1• S 9/25/95 11,000,000.00 99.3803333 10,931,836.67 10,931,836.67
092595 0001 ISITC
-CONFIRMATION ONLY' NOTE: CUSIP 07018BY37
UTR50926A U S TREASURY REPD 9/25/95 GAT FBE USD
81 5.6500% 9/26/95 AAA S 9/25/95 2,700,000.00 100.0000000 2,700,000.00 2,700,000.00
092595 0006
*CONFIRMATION ONLY* NOTE: COLLAT: 2.810104 CUSIP 912827J94
Pay Codes: �S• indicates SETTLED, 1*' indicates UNSETTLED
PROGRAM NAME: P10022 T R A N 5 A C T 1 0 N J O U R N A L PAGE: 5
RUN DATE: 10/04/95 8/31/95 TNRU 9/30/95 AS OF DATE: 9/30/95
ACCOUNT NO: 203 County Sanitation Districts-Orange Co. BANK ACCT: OCSF0752222
CUSIP DESCRIPTION TRADE ORIGINAL FACE BROKER FACTOR COMMISSIONS GAIN/LOSS DELIVERY CURRENCY
TRADE NO COUPON MATURITY TICKET IF SETTLE PAR/SNARES/OTY PRICE PRINCIPAL SEC FEE INTEREST B/S ISITC NET AMOUNT
---------------------------------------------------
BUY
B
UTR50927A U 5 TREASURY REPO 9/26/95 FCN FBE USD
85 5.5500% 9/27/95 AAA S 9/26/95 27,700,000.00 100.0000000 27,700,000.00 27,700,000.00
092695 0004
-CONFIRMATION ONLY" NOTE: COLLAT:27.205MM CUSIP 912827C83
UTR50928C U S TREASURY REPO 9/27/95 GAT FBE USE,
88 5.7700% 9/28/95 AAA S 9/27/95 27,600,000.00 100.0000000 27,600,000.00 27,600,000.00
092795 0007
-CONFIRMATION ONLY- NOTE: COLLAT: 9128271192 25.980MM
3134AOM02 FED NM LN DEB DO 10/2/95 9/28/95 MCD FBE USO
92 6.7200% 10/02/00 AAA • 10/02/95 25,000,000.00 100.0000000 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00
092895 0065
ISITC
912827R46 U 5 TREASURY NOTE 9/28/95 SEE FBE USD
94 7.1250% 9/30/99 AAA • 10/02/95 50,000,000.00 103.5937500 51,796,875.00 19,467.21 51,816,342.21
092895 0121
• ISITC
U R G E N T "
912827R46 U S TREASURY NOTE 9/28/95 BRS FBE USD
95 7.1250% 9/30/99 AAA " 10/02/95 42,000,000.00 103.5937500 43,509,375.00 16,352.46 43,525,727.46
092895 0121
ISITC
• U R G E N T
UTR50929C U S TREASURY REPO 9/28/95 DAI FBE USO
91 5.8800% 9/29/95 AAA S 9/28/95 27,600,000.00 100.0000000 27,600,000.00 27,600,000.00
092895 0001-8
-CONFIRMATION ONLY* NOTE: COLLATERAL: 912794XB2 28.995MM
912827R46 U S TREASURY NOTE 9/29/95 SAL FBE USD
109 7.1250% 9/30/99 AAA • 10/02/95 5,000,000.00 103.8593750 5,192,968.75 1,946.72 5,194,915.47
092995 0084
• URGENT • ISITC
UTR510U2A U S TREASURY REPO 9/29/95 GAT FBE USD
101 6.2000% 10/02/95 AAA S 9/29/95 27,600,000.00 100.0000000 27,600,000.00 27,600,000.00
092995 0007-A
*CONFIRMATION ONLY* NOTE: COLLATERAL: 9128271.67 28.580001
9050906A2 BOSTON RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT 9/30/95 NO USD
115 3.9900% 12/31/24 Al 5 9/30/95 384,868.73 10O.D000000 384,868.73 384,868.73
Pay Codes: 'S' indicates SETTLED, 1•0 indicates UNSETTLED
PROGRAM NAME: P10022 T R A N S A C T I O N J O U R N A L PAGE: 6
RUN DATE: 10/04/95 8/31/95 THRU 9/30/95 AS OF DATE: 9/30/95
ACCOUNT NO: 203 County Sanitation Districts-Orange Co. BANK ACCT: OCSF0752222
CUSIP DESCRIPTION TRADE ORIGINAL FACE BROKER FACTOR COMMISSIONS GAIN/LOSS DELIVERY CURRENCY
TRADE NO COUPON MATURITY TICKET N SETTLE PAR/SHARES/OTY PRICE PRINCIPAL SEC FEE INTEREST BIG ISITC NET AMOUNT
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bm
17120QJJI CHRYSLER FIN MTN SER N 1/11/95 9/08/95 GSC SDF USD
41 8.1600% 1/13/97 CANCELLED 9/13/95 1,500,000.00- 102.3180000 1,534,770.00- 60,520.00- 1,595,290.00-
090895 0100 ISITC
------------------- ------............
TOTALS ""`*'* 755,900,244.85 787,323,629.73
---------------- ..............---------------------------...........................----------------..................------------------------
Se1L
29348PAC8 ENOGE% MTN 8/7/95 PRIV 144-A 9/11/95 MLP SDF USD
44 6.7700% 8/07/00 A- S 9/13/95 5,000,000.00 100.1670000 5,008,350.00 33,850.00 5,042,200.00
091195 0034 ISITC
DELIVER TO: SOF DTCM 5132 RE: Merrill Lynch PF&5
FNI51103A F N M A DISC NT- 9/25195 HIP 5.58000000 THE USD
82 5.5800% 11/03/95 A1" S 9/26/95 25,000,000.00 99.1320000 24,783,000.00 69,750.00 24,852,750.00
092595 0035-A ISITC
` U R G E N T ' NOTE: CUSIP 313588MUS
DELIVER TO: ABA# 0210-0012-8 CHEMICAL NYC/MERRILL
FNIS1218A F N L M C DISC MT- 9/28/95 SLH 5.60000000 FBE USD
97 5.4700% 12/18/95 AT- • 10/02/95 22,000,000.00 95.6628889 21,705,835.56 30,653.33 21,736,488.89
092895 0078 ISITC
` U R G E N T ` NOTE: CUSIP 313396GR7
DELIVER TO: ABAM 0210-0012-8 CHEMICAL NYC/LEHMAN
------------------- -----------..---.
TOTALS '*"" 51,497,185.56 51,631,438.89
Pay Codes: IS' indicates SETTLED, 1'1 indicates UNSETTLED
PROGRAM NAME: P10022 T R A N S A C T I O N J 0 U R N A L PAGE: 1
RUN DATE: 10/04/95 8/31195 TNRU 9/30/95 AS OF DATE: 9/30/95
ACCOUNT NO: 603 County Sanitation Districts-Orange C0.(Liq-0p) BANK ACCT: OCSF0751112
CUSIP DESCRIPTION TRADE ORIGINAL FACE BROKER FACTOR COMMISSIONS GAIN/LOSS DELIVERY CURRENCY
TRADE NO COUPON MATURITY TICKET N SETTLE PAR/SNARES/OTT PRICE PRINCIPAL SEC FEE INTEREST BIG ISITC NET AMOUNT
1my
9850906A2 BOSTON RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT 9/07/95 ND USD
4 4.0000% 12/31/24 Al S 9/07/95 1.00 100.0000000 1.00 1.00
090795 1000
912794738 U S TREASURY BILLS 9/08/95 FOR 5.69000000 FOE USD
11 5.6900% 9/21/95 AAA S 9/08/95 15,000,ODO.00 99.7945277 14,969,179.16 14,969,179.16
090895 0040 ISITC
'CONFIRMATION ONLY-
ASISIZ04A ASSOC CORP OF NO AMERICA DISC NT 9/08/95 DIR PHY USD
7 5.6800% 12/04/95 A1+ S 9/08/95 3,000,000.00 98.6273333 2,958,820.00 2,958,820.00
090895 0002-A ISITC
'CONFIRMATION ONLY* NOTE: PHYSICAL PIECES 1%3MM,
FNI50911A F M L M C DISC NT* 9/08/95 GSC FEE USD
14 5.5800% 9/11/95 AT+ S 9/08/95 12,000,000.00 99.9535000 11,994,420.00 11,994,420.00
090895 0042 ISITC
-CONFIRMATION ONLY* NOTE: CUSIP 313396LP6
FNI51103A F N M A DISC NT* 9/08/95 MLP FBE USD
12 5.5800% 11/03/95 AT+ S 9/08195 12,000,000.00 99.1320000 11,895,840.00 11,895,840.00
090895 0041 ISITC
'CONFIRMATION ONLY* NOTE: CUSIP 313588NU5
ON151208A ONTARIO HYDRO DISC NT 9/08/95 DON PRY USD
9 5.6600% 12/08/95 At+ S 9/08/95 3,000,000.00 98.5692776 2,957,078.33 2,957,078.33
090895 0006-A ISITC
*CONFIRMATION ONLY`
UTR50911B U S TREASURY REPO 9/08/95 SLH FBE USD
15 5.7300% 9/11/95 AAA S 9/08/95 12,00,000.00 100.0000000 12,000,000.00 12,000,000.00
090895 0005-A
*CONFIRMATION ONLY* NOTE: COLL. 9128271147 12.135MM
WC1509105 U S NEST COMMUNICATIONS DISC NT* 9108/95 GSC SDI USD
8 5.7000% 9/18/95 AT+ S 9/08/95 3,000,000.00 99.8416666 2,995,250.00 2,995,250.00
090895 0009-B ISITC
*CONFIRMATION ONLY* NOTE: CUSIP 91289GWJO
912794T38 U S TREASURY BILLS 9/11/95 FOR 5.70000000 FEE USD
24 5.7000% 9/21/95 AAA S 9/11/95 24,100,000.00 99.8416666 24,061,841.67 24,061,841.67
091195 0001-A ISITC
*CONFIRMATION ONLY'
Pay Codes: IS' indicates SETTLED, I*' indicates UNSETTLED
PROGRAM NAME: P10022 T R A N S A C T 1 0 N J O U R N A L PAGE: 2
RUN DATE: 10/04/95 8/31/95 THRU 9/30/95 AS OF DATE: 9/30/95
ACCOUNT NO: 603 County Sanitation Districts-Orange CO.(Liq-Op) BANK ACCT: OCSF0751112
CUSIP DESCRIPTION TRADE ORIGINAL FACE BROKER FACTOR COMMISSIONS GAIN/LOSS DELIVERY CURRENCY
TRADE NO COUPON MATURITY TICKET N SETTLE PAR/SNARES/OTY PRICE PRINCIPAL SEC FEE INTEREST B/S ISITC NET AMOUNT
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
B
AN360201A REPUBLIC NEN YORK CORP BKRS ACC 9/13/95 SLN PNY USD
25 5.5700% 2/01/96 A1* S 9/14/95 3,000,000.00 97.8338890 2,935,016.67 2,935,016.67
091395 0030 ISITC
• U R G E N T - NOTE: PHYSICAL PIECES 3XIMM
242998MZI ** DO NOT USE - USE 25466P9J9 ** 9/15/95 MSC SDF USD
28 9.0000% 8/01/96 A 9/20/95 2,000,000.00 102.5200000 2,050,400.00 84,500.00 2,134,900.00
091595 OO83 ISITC
25466P9J9 DISCOVER CREDIT CORP MTN D8/1/91 9/15/95 NBC PNY USD
37 9.0000% 8/01/96 A S 9/20/95 2,000,000.00 102.5200000 2,050,400.00 84,500.00 2,134,900.00
D91595 0083 ISITC
*REVISION OF DELIVERY TYPE* NOTE: PHYSICAL: 1 PIECE K 2MM
* U R G E N T *
812387AT5 SEARS ROEBUCK DEB 9/15/95 MSC DTC USD
27 8.5500% 8/01/96 A S 9/20/95 2,500,000.00 102.1620000 2,554,050.00 29,093.75 2,583,143.75
091595 0079 ISITC
UTR50919A U S TREASURY REPO 9/18/95 GAT FEE USD
31 5.75001 9/19/95 AAA 5 9/18/95 3,100,000.00 100.0000000 3,100,000.00 3,100,000.00
D91895 0018-A
*CONFIRMATION ONLY* NOTE: COLL: 912827M66 3.225MM
KFI51023A KFN INTERNATIONAL FIN. DISC NT* 9/19/95 SLN SDF USD
34 5.7000% 10/23/95 Al- 5 9/19/95 1,000,000.00 99.4616670 994,616.67 994,616.67
D91995 0010 ISITC
-CONFIRMATION ONLY* NOTE: CUSIP: 48246KXPB
UTR50920A U S TREASURY REPO 9/19/95 Dal THE USD
35 5.6500% 9/20195 AAA S 9/19/95 2,000,000.00 100.0000000 2,000,000.00 2,000,OOD.00
091995 0009
*CONFIRMATION ONLY* NOTE: COLL: 9128271.26 2.040MN
FH151215A F H L M C DISC NT* 9/21/95 GSC FEE USD
43 5.4700% 12/15/95 A1* S 9/21/95 6,500,000.00 98.7084722 6,416,050.70 6,416,050.70
092195 0019 ISITC
*CONFIRMATION ONLY* NOTE: CUSIP: 3133960116
FL151023A FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK DISC NT* 9/21/95 FOB FOE USO
41 5.5700% 10/23/95 Al 5 9/21/95 12,000,000.00 99.5048888 11,940,586.67 11,940,586.67
092195 0001 ISITC
*CONFIRMATION ONLY* NOTE: CUSIP: 313384NNO
Pay Codes: 'S� indicates SETTLED, 1*0 indicates UNSETTLED
PROGRAM NAME: P10022 T R A N S A C T I O N J O U A N A L PAGE: 3
RUN DATE: 10/04/95 8/31/95 THRU 9/30/95 AS OF DATE: 9/30/95
ACCOUNT NO: 603 County Sanitation Districts-Orange CO.(Liq-0p) BANK ACCT: OCSF0751112
CUSIP DESCRIPTION TRADE ORIGINAL FACE BROKER FACTOR COMMISSIONS GAIN/LOSS DELIVERY CURRENCY
TRADE NO COUPON MATURITY TICKET N SETTLE PAR/SHARES/CTY PRICE PRINCIPAL SEC FEE INTEREST B/S ISITC NET AMOUNT
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BUY
GP951013C GEN ELEC CAPITAL CORP DISC His 9/21/95 SLH SDP USD
42 5.7100% 10/13/95 AT- S 9/21/95 3,000,000.00 99.6510555 2,989,531.67 2,989,531.67
092195 0010 ISITC
-CONFIRMATION ONLY' NOTE: CUSIP: 36959J%00
UTR50922A U S TREASURY REPO 9/21/95 MLP FBE USD
44 5.6000% 9/22/95 AAA S 9/21/95 12,000,000.00 1DO.000OODO 12,000,000.00 12,000,00D.00
092195 0024-C
-CONFIRMATION ONLY- NOTE: COLLATERAL:. CUSIP 912827S94 FACE 12,000,000
UTR50925A U S TREASURY REPO 9/22/95 FCH FBE USO
51 5.5700% 9/25/95 AAA S 9/22/95 12,000,000.00 100.0000000 12,000,000.00 12,000,ODO.00
092295 0002-B
-CONFIRMATION ONLY* NOTE: COLL: 912827U91 12.165MM
A7151103D AMERICAN TELEPHONE % TEL DIS MT- 9/25/95 MLP SOT USD
54 5.7200% 11/D3/95 AT- S 9/25/95 3,000,000.00 99.3803333 2,981,410.00 2,981,410.00
092595 0001 ISITC
-CONFIRMATION ONLY' NOTE: CUSIP 03018BY37
UTR50926A U S TREASURY REPO 9/25/95 GAT FBE USD
55 5.6500% 9/26195 AAA S 9/25/95 9,000,000.00 100.0000000 9,000,000.00 9,000,000.00
092595 0006
-CONFIRMATION ONLY- NOTE: COLLAT: 8.895MM CUSIP 912827TS1
UTR50927A U S TREASURY REPO 9/26/95 FCH FBE USD
58 5.5500% 9/27/95 AAA S 9/26/95 9,000,000.00 1DO.0000000 9,000,000.00 9,000,000.DO
092695 0004
`CONFIRMATION ONLY- NOTE: COLLAT: 8.84MM CUSIP 912827C83
FH1510208 F H L M C DISC His 9/27/95 GSC FBE USD
61 5.6400% 10/20/95 AT+ S 9/27/95 6,000,000.00 99.6396666 5,978,380.00 5,978,380.00
092795 0003 ISITC
-CONFIRMATION ONLY- NOTE: CUSIP 313396NE9
UTR50928C U S TREASURY REPO 9/27/95 OAT FBE USD
62 5.7700% 9/28/95 AAA S 9/27/95 3,200,000.00 100.0000000 3,20D,000.00 3,200,OOD.00
092795 0007
-CONFIRMATION ONLY' NOTE: COLLAT: 912827692 3.015MM
UTR50929C U S TREASURY REPO 9/28/95 DAI FBE USD
65 5.8800% 9/29/95 AAA S 9/28/95 3,200,000.00 100.0000000 3,200,000.00 3,200,000.00
092895 0001-B
-CONFIRMATION ONLY- NOTE: COLLATERAL: 912794%82 3.365MM
Pay Codes: IS' indicates SETTLED, „, indicates UNSETTLED
PROGRAM NAME: P10022 T R A N S A C T I O N J O U R N A L PAGE: 4
RUN DATE: 10/04/95 8131/95 TNRU 9/30/95 AS OF DATE: 9/30/95
ACCOUNT NO: 603 County Sanitation Districts-Orange CO.(Liq-Op) BANK ACCT: OCSF0751112
CUSIP DESCRIPTION TRADE ORIGINAL FACE BROKER FACTOR COMMISSIONS GAIN/LOSS DELIVERY CURRENCY
TRADE NO COUPON MATURITY TICKET B SETTLE PAR/SNARES/OTY PRICE PRINCIPAL SEC FEE INTEREST B/S ISITC NET AMOUNT
........................................................ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Buy
UTR51002A U S TREASURY REPO 9/29/95 DAI FBE USD
68 6.2000% 10/02/95 AAA S 9/29/95 3,200,000.00 100.0000000 3,200,000.00 3,200,000.00
092995 0007-A
-CONFIRMATION ONLY' NOTE: COLLATERAL: 912827L67 3.315MM
9850906A2 BOSTON RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT 9/30/95 ND USD
72 3.9900% 12/31/24 Al S 9/30/95 128,416.80 100.0000000 128,416.80 128,416.80
242990NZI •' DO NOT USE - USE 25466P9J9 ' 9/15/95 NBC SOF USD
36 9.0000% 8/01/96 CANCELLED • 9/20/95 2,000,000.00- 102.5200000 2,050,400.00- 84,500.00- 2,134,900.00-
091595 0083 ISITC
------------------- ..................
TOTALS :""' 179,500,889.34 179,614,483.D9
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sell
912794T38 U S TREASURY BILLS 9/14/95 DAI 5.69000000 1,973.35 FOE USD
26 5.6900% 9/21/95 AAA S 9/14/95 3,000,000.00 99.8893610 2,996,680.83 2,996,680.83
091495 0002 ISITC
'CONFIRMATION ONLY'
DELIVER TO: ABAB 0210-0001-8 Bk of NYC/DAINA
................... ----------------- ------------
TOTALS "••" 2,996,680.83 1,973.35 2,996,680.83
Pay Codes: is' indicates SETTLED, 1" indicates UNSETTLED
FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN
RESOURCES COMMITTEE
AGENDA FOR
OCTOBER 11, 1995
FAH R95-41 : SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION - Consideration of motion to
receive and file staff report regarding performance monitoring of
Pacific Investment Management Company
Summary
As indicated in the staff report to your Committee on this agenda item, Attachment"A" presents
PIMCO's Monthly Reports for the Districts' Short-Tenn Liquid Operating Monies portfolio and
the Long-Term Operating Monies portfolio for the period starting September 7, 1995, and
ending September 30, 1995. These reports are submitted in compliance with Section 14.0,
Reporting, of the Districts' Investment Policy Statement.
To assist in understanding the contents of the Monthly Reports, Attachment"B' presents a brief
description of each performance characteristic along with its Investment Policy reference.
Please note that portfolio performance numbers are not included in the attached Monthly
Reports, in that September was a structuring period for PIMCO, and therefore performance
comparisons are not available. At the same time, the following earnings information is
presented for the September period of investment holdings:
Current Market
Portfolio Initial Investment Value Earnings
Short-Term $60,000,000 $60,219,369 $219,369
Long-Tenn $233,100,000 $234,268,855 $1,168,855
Total Earnings $1,388,224
Staff Recommendation
Information item only.
J:\W PDOGFIN\CRANETPC.MTGfAHR.95UTEM\FAHR�,41A
FAlIR95-41 ATTACHMENT "A"
MONTHLY REPORT
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING
(for the month ending September 30, 1995)
Liquid Operating Monies
14.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value: $60,219,369
Historical Cost: $59,980,198
14.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: .15
Of Index: .25
14.1.3 I% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact (gain/loss) of 1% Change: $75,400
14.1.4 REVERSE REPOS % of Portfolio in Reverse Repos:
(see attached schedule) 0
14.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY % of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 87%
14.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: AA
14.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING % of Portfolio Below "A": 0
14.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance"
14.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Portfolio Total Rate of Return:
Month: ------
3 Months: ------
12 Months: ------
Year-to-Date: ------
Index Total Rate of Return:
I Month: ------
r imar4etlmrrmm�lrcrrmlAarr. 5
Page I of 2
FAlIR95-41 MONTHLY REPORT ATTACHMENT"A"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING
((or the month ending September 30, 1995)
Long Tenn Operating Monies
14.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Markel Value: $234,268,855
Historical Cost: $232,443,340
14.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 2.6
Of Index: 2.4
14.1.3 I% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact (gain/loss) of 1% Change: $5,530,000
14.1.4 REVERSE REPOS % of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: 0%
(see attached schedule)
14.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY Not Required for this Portfolio ------
14.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: AA
14.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING % of Portfolio Below "A": 0%
14.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance"
14.L9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Portfolio Total Rate of Return:
1 Month: ------
3 Months: -----•
12 Months: ------
Year-to-Date: ------
Index Total Rate of Return:
1 Month: ------
clmnr4wltqmnnr anmOmn.
Page 2 of 2
FAHR95-41 ATTACHMENT "B"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING
FOR THE
DISTRICTS' INVESTMENT PROGRAM
POLICY
REFERENCE PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTIC
14.1.1 Cost and market value of the portfolio (monthly mark-to-market).
14.1.2 Modred duration of the portfolio compared to benchmark.
14.1.3 Dollar change In value of the portfolio for a 1%change In Interest rate.
14.1.4 Percent of portfolio Invested In reverse repurchase agreements, and a schedule which matches the
maturity of such reverse repurchase agreements with the cash flows which are available to repay
them at maturity.
14.1.5 For the Liquid Operating Monies account only,the percent ofponYallo maturing within 90 days.
14.1.6 Average portfolio credit quality.
14.1.7 Percent of portfolio with c dlt ratings below'A"by any rating agency, and a description of such
securities.
14.1.9 Listing of any transactions or holdings which do not comply with this policy or with the California
Government Code.
14.1.9 Time-welghled fofal refs of return for the portfolio for the prior three months,twelve months,year-
to-date, and since Inception compared to the benchmark returns for the same periods.
ADDL" Comparison of portfolio performance to market index benchmark.
ADDL" Comparison of Manager's performance to peer group benchmark.
ADDL" Monitodng of organizational and structural changes of Investment management firm.
ADDL" Audit portfolios for compliance with Investment policy guidelines.
Notes
ADDL = Monilodng of Addilional Performance Characteristics
�w JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
MEETING
AGENDA FOR
OCTOBER 25, 1995
Agenda Item (11)(b)(9): FAHR 95-42 Consideration of the following
actions re Establishing Policy for
Microcomputer Acquisitions:
(a) Consideration of motion declaring a policy that all PC technology purchases
be limited to the most recent list of Tier 1 and Tier 2 vendors as defined by
The GartnerGroup, for both desktop computers and mobile computers.
(b) Consideration of motion declaring a policy that all purchasing actions
relating to the purchase of PC technology utilize California Multiple Award
Schedule (CMAS) contracts for the purchase of PC technology from among
the list of Tier 1 and Tier 2 vendors as defined by The GartnerGroup; and
authorizing staff to compare CMAS pricing to choose the lowest priced Tier 1
and Tier 2 vendor's configuration applicable to the Districts' needs.
(c) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Dell
Computer for the Purchase of 60 Personal Computers and Monitors and
Other Associated Components (Specification No. E-261) for a total amount
not to exceed $208,900.00 plus sales tax.
Summary
At the July 6, 1995 meeting of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee, item
PDC95-24"Discussion of Plant Automation Computer System and Consideration of Motion
Authorizing Staff to Issue Purchase Order with Pioneer-Standard Electronics for Two VAX
4000 Model 705A Computers for Plant 2 Plant Automation", was presented to the
Committee. This proposal included the purchase of 32 DEC Pentium Personal Computers
for Operations at both plants. The Committee authorized staff to proceed with the
purchase of the Two VAX 4000 Computers for Plant 2 automation, but the purchase of
the Personal Computers was deferred pending a staff evaluation to identify more cost
effective options.
Staff has researched a number of related issues that go beyond those addressed at the
Planning, Design and Construction Committee for Plant Automation's specific request.
Due to the broader issues, it was felt that the Finance, Administration and Human
Resource Committee was the appropriate body to present this report.
This report reviews options which have been studied by staff and recommends a plan of
action for present and future microcomputer purchases, together with a request for
authorization to purchase more than the original 32 Personal Computers (current request
now total 60). The 32 systems which were requested in July had an average cost of
$5,467. The proposed acquisition being presented in this report has decreased the
average price by a range of 41780 to $2220,depending on the configuration.
Staff Recommendation
Information Technology recommends the following administrative policy:
Budgeting for PC assets shall limit 'bump down" shifting of assets to no more than
two levels. This means that a new computer may release the previous PC to be
shifted to another user. That second user's old computer can then be relocated once.
However, if another PC is then "bumped" from the third user, that PC is deemed to
be surplus and will not be reinstalled elsewhere.
User 1 User 2 User 3
New PC ----> Old PC----->Old PC ---->Surplus PC
FAHR Committee Recommendation to Executive Committee
The Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee recommends the Executive
Committee approve the Information Technology recommended administrative policy and the
recommended actions above.
Executive Committee Recommendation to the Joint Boards of Directors
The Executive Committee recommends that the following actions be considered by the Joint
Boards of Directors:
(a) Consideration of motion declaring a policy that all PC technology purchases be limited to
the most recent list of Tier 1 and Tier 2 vendors as defined by The GartnerGroup, for both
desktop computers and mobile computers.
(b) Consideration of motion declaring a policy that all purchasing actions relating to the
purchase of PC technology utilize California Multiple Award Schedule (CMAS) contracts
for the purchase of PC technology from among the list of Tier 1 and Tier 2 vendors as
defined by The GartnerGroup; and authorizing staff to compare CMAS pricing to choose
the lowest priced Tier 1 and Tier 2 vendor's configuration applicable to the Districts'
needs.
(c) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Dell Computer for
the Purchase of 60 Personal Computers and Monitors and Other Associated Components
(Specification No. E-261) for a total amount not to exceed $208,900.00 plus sales tax.
ti
a
v;
October 2, 1995
STAFF REPORT
FAHR95-42: Microcomputer Acquisition Issues
SUMMARY
At the July 6, 1995 meeting of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee,
item PDC95-24 was presented to the Committee. This item was titled "Discussion
of Plant Automation Computer System and Consideration of Motion Authorizing
Staff to Issue Purchase Order with Pioneer-Standard Electronics for Two VAX 4000
Model 705A Computers for Plant 2 Plant Automation." In addition, this proposal
included the purchase of 32 DEC Pentium Personal Computers for Operations at
both plants. The Committee authorized staff to proceed with the purchase of the
Two VAX 4000 Computers for Plant 2 automation. The purchase of the 32 Pentium
Personal Computers was deferred pending a staff evaluation to identify more cost
effective options.
Staff has researched a number of related issues and prepared a detailed response for
the Committee in a concentrated effort to obtain the best value for the Districts'
Information Technology investment. The issues go beyond those addressed at the
Planning, Design and Construction Committee for Plant Automation's specific
request. In the months which have followed, many other requests for Personal
Computers have come forward from other divisions and departments. Due to the
broader issues, it was felt that the Finance, Administration and Human Resource
Committee was the appropriate body to present this report.
This report reviews options which have been studied by staff and recommends a
plan of action for present and future microcomputer purchases, together with a
request for authorization to purchase more Personal Computers. The 32 systems
which were requested in July had an average cost of $5,467. The proposed
acquisition being presented in this report has the average price for the same
configuration lowered by $1,780 to $3,687 each. The average cost of the
remaining 28 systems are $3,247 each. (The original 32 systems are for Plant
Automation and have a special configuration and require larger 17-inch monitors, all
of which increases the cost.)
CSDOC 0 P.D.Bev 8127 0 Fountain VW1,,CA 92728-0127 0 T.I. (714)962-2411 0 FAX(714)982-3964
0
FAHR95-42
Page 2 of 11
October 2, 1995
COSTS OF COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY
1. Software Drives Hardware Needs:
Many trends have developed since the creation of the Microcomputer (otherwise
known as Personal Computer or PC). Over time, the power of the PC has increased
while the price has decreased. These trends have received greater attention by the
general public than other less-noticeable trends. The most important of these other
trends is that software increasingly drives the need for hardware. The example
given below is only typical of many situations which support this point.
Example: The most recent evidence that software drives hardware is the new
release of Windows 95. The popular price is only $89.95 for the software
but several hundreds of dollars of hardware upgrades are necessary in most
instances to enable Windows 95 to function acceptably. The alternative
might seem to be to avoid buying Windows 95 and keep the older version,
Windows 3.1; however, within the next 30 days, Microsoft Corporation, the
publisher of all Windows software, will remove Windows 3.1 from the
market, giving the public no choice. If a business needs to buy one or more
new computers to plug into a network, the network manager is faced with
the dilemma of having a mixed network -- some users with Windows 3.1 and
some with Windows 95. This drives up the cost of maintaining the network
as a whole.
2. Capital Cost is Only a Fraction of True Cost:
The most accurate measure of the cost of PC technology extends far beyond the
purchase price of the hardware. In 1987, the GartnerGroup Personal Computing
service conducted its first analysis of PC ownership for corporate computing
environments.' The capital cost of a typical desktop computer is only 12% of the
true cost of ownership (TCO). Administration accounts for 14%, Support 57% and
'The GartnerGroup is the world's leading independent advisor to business and
government professionals making information technology (IT) decisions. The
Districts contract with the GartnerGroup to provide advisory services and consulting
in three defined areas of expertise: Network Computing Infrastructures (NCI),
Personal Computing (PC), and Office Information Systems (OIS).
FAHR95-42
Page 3 of 11
October 2, 1995
End User Operations 17%. Since that first report, the five-year total cost of
ownership (TCO) of a DOS-based PC has ballooned from $19,296 to $41,536 -- an
increase of 153 percent.'
Understanding total cost of ownership is crucial for several reasons. In a recent
GartnerGroup Personal Computing Strategic Analysis Report', stated:
"Even though the capital costs for hardware represent a small percentage of
the TCO, consistent and carefully crafted hardware procurement strategies
are critical. Enterprises should always attempt to get the best deal on
hardware, but they should not make it their singular focus. Blindly focusing
on price by buying the lowest-cost PC can foster heterogeneity, which
increases support and administrative costs. It may also force an enterprise to
buy from risky vendors. PC hardware is not a commodity nor are the
vendors."
It was also apparent from the GartnerGroup study that the Districts' current staffing
cannot meet its current needs, much less for the balance of FY 95-96. It was with
this idea in mind that Information Technology plans to outsource part or all of two
major service functions: Computer Hardware Service and Software Help Desk
Services.
3. The Need for Standardization:
The GartnerGroup recognized many years ago that one of the keys to lowering
operating costs for PC assets is through minimizing financial and technological risk.
This could be accomplished by focusing PC hardware acquisitions on a tiering
structure created as a result of extensive industry research. Many benchmarks were
used for evaluating PC vendors but all generally fall into two categories: Financial
Performance and Product Reliability. GartnerGroup's recommendations are to limit
the purchase of PC assets to tier t and tier 2 vendors only.
'Desktop Computing: Management Strategies to Control The Rapidly
Escalating Cost of Ownership; The GartnerGroup, Personal Computing Strategic
Analysis Report, January 5, 1995; PC: R-PCTOC; W. Kirwin, E. Younker.
'Keys to Procuring and Managing PC Hardware Assets; The GartnerGroup,
Personal Computing Strategic Analysis Report, September 12, 1995; PC:R-100-113;
C. Goodhue, at al.; pg.4-5
FAHR95-42
Page 4 of 11
October 2, 1995
"The marketplace has historically recognized IBM, Compaq Computer Corp.
and Apple Computer Inc. as indisputable Tier 1 vendors due to rock solid
reliability and market clout. For users, however, recognizing the factors that
separate risky Tier 3 vendors (which include a variety of small and/or
financially troubled companies that should be avoided) from our recommended
Tier 2 vendors (those demonstrating financial stability and high levels of
quality assurance), has presented more of a challege. Our desktop vendor
evaluation methodology is designed to help organizations identify those
providers that offer the best investment protection and least amount of risk.i'
GartnerGroup's tiering structure is a living document, constantly changing with the
changes in the market place. GartnerGroup maintains two separate lists -- one for
desktop computer vendors and the second for mobile computer vendors (laptops,
portables, etc.) These vendors are as follows:'
DESKTOP COMPUTER VENDORS MOBILE COMPUTER VENDORS
Consolidated Tier 1 / Tier 2 Tier 1
Apple
Acer Compaq
Apple IBM
AST Toshiba
AT&T
Bull /Zenith
Compaq
Digital Tier 2
Dell AST
RP Bull /Zenith '
IBM Dell
ICL (Europe only) Digital
NEC HP
Olivetti (Europe only) AT&T
Siemens Nixdorf (Europe only) NEC
Olivetti (Europe only)
'GartnerGroup PC Research Note, March 7, 1994: Strategic Palnning, SPA-
820-1036, C. Goodhue.
'GartnerGroup Personal Computing Strategic Analysis Report; Keys to
Procuring and Managing PC Hardware Assets; PC-R-100-113; pg 8. C. Goodhue,
at. al.
Q
FAHR95-42
Page 5 of 11
October 2, 1995
GartnerGroup's recommendations for standardization were echoed by the recent
study of the Districts' Finance Department, performed by Ernst & Young at the
request of the Joint Boards. This study included a review of the Information
Services function, which was a part of the Finance Department at that time. In the
final report, one of the recommendations called for standardization for the same
reasons as those stated by GartnerGroup. 'These standards would limit the versions
and levels of hardware and software that would be purchased and supported by the
MIS.°s
4. Obsolescence of PC assets:
Government accounting standards call for a standard 5-year depreciation for PC
assets; however, actual practice has shown that the effective life of a PC averages
from 18 to 36 months. The machine continues to function as a machine long after
it has reached functional obsolescence due to the rapidly increasing demands of
software technology. Districts' staff has sought to extend the life of its PC assets
through a rigorous program of installing more memory modules, new processor
boards, network cards, and other components -- all in an effort to "make do" with
existing assets and avoid relegating still-functioning machines to a high tech
equivalent of a "bone yard", This would then be followed by the purchase of a
newer, faster PC. Another method is the "bump-down" effect. This means that
when a new computer is needed, it is allocated to the user having the highest need.
In turn, that user's old PC is moved to the next lower ranking user in the division,
and so on. Although it maximizes PC assets, a single PC purchase means the
shifting of as many as 6 PC units and occupies a full-time staff for nearly a week.
These efforts have not been cost-effective and require large stockpiles of spare
parts, space for service work, and increased staffing. Although a more detailed
analysis is still pending, a comparison of the Districts' past methods of extending
the effective life of PC assets appears to increase our service and operating costs of
PC ownership far beyond the norm, negating any savings originally sought. This
practice was also highly discouraged by Ernst & Young in their Finance Function
Study.'
'Finance Function Review Final Report; Ernst & Young LLP; July 1995,
Information Systems, pg. 7.
Finance Function Review Final Report; Ernst & Young LLP; July 1995,
Information Systems, pg. 4.
0
FAHR95-42
Page 6 of 11
October 2, 1995
5. Threshold of Change: A New Network
Another recommendation made in the Ernst & Young report of the Finance
Department was for Information Services (now Information Technology) to
implement a more robust network to meet the needs of critical new applications
which are rapidly approaching, such as the Financial Information System.'
Information Technology (IT) is in the design phase of a new network topology,
replacing the old ArcNet cabling scheme and Novell Netware file servers with a new
single-domain Windows NT Server network running on Ethernet. This will provide
four readily identifiable needs; a single logon for users, greater network security, the
ability to implement E-mail, and the ability to install a communications server to
facilitate greater ease in accessing Internet and other external data resources. All
desktop PC units will be connected to the Windows NT Server; however, this major
upgrade still cannot avoid the issue that the Districts has a number of PC units
which are not robust enough to connect to this new network and must be replaced.
6. Staffing Required to Support Systems
One of the items addressed in all discussions of the true cost of Personal Computing
technology is the staff required to support such systems. Two types of personnel
are required: hardware support and software support. When Personal Computers
are connected together in networks such as we have here at the Districts, fewer
staff are required for software support than would be required if all of the systems
were not networked. This is partially offset by the fact that type of software
support staff utilized must possess networking expertise, which may require
obtaining higher-paid professionals. Hardware support staff required is slightly more
for networked environments because of the need to support the networking
hardware infrastructure.
The study conducted by Ernst & Young mentioned that the Information Technology
staff was stretched too thin. Gartner Group analysis recommends one FTE
hardware support staff person per every 75 to 100 Personal Computers. The
Districts now employees 3 FTEs for 375 computers. More systems need to be
purchased before the end of FY 95-96. Information Technology would require at
least two additional FTE for hardware support and one more FTE for software
support. In an effort to save the Districts money, Information Technology budgeted
for a hardware maintenance contract and a contract for software help desk services
'Finance Function Review Final Report; Ernst & Young LLP; July 1995;
Information Systems, pg. 8.
a
FAHR95-42
Page 7 of 11
October 2, 1995
for FY 95-96 instead of requesting the three additional FTE staff. In this manner,
Information Services will partially out-source these activities and free the existing
staff to perform preventative maintenance and work on other activities which staff
has not had enough time to work on.
OPTIONS STUDIED
Item number six above dealt with staffing required to support the Districts PC
assets. Information Services staff has contacted several service vendors to obtain
preliminary information on levels of service, service quality, separation of duties and
responsibilities as well as cost estimates. The budget for computer hardware
services for FY 95-96 was $90,000 and software help desk services was $60,000.
Following more detailed study, staff estimates of computer hardware services will
cost $84,000 and software help desk services will cost $56,000, all for FY 95-96.
In light of the issues reviewed in items 1-5 above, the Districts needs greater
flexibility in addressing the issues of acquiring PC assets. Four options were
reviewed:
1. The previous method was revisited. This method involved batching the
Purchase Requests of the various departments and divisions and making
general purchases 2 or 3 times per year. The rationale of this method was
that the aggregate of the requests would usually be large enough to involve
public bids and Board authorization to issue a Purchase Order to the lowest
responsible bidder. Many problems were experienced with this method:
a. The need for PC units could not always be relegated to such a rigid
time table.
b. Staff effort to prepare combined specifications, prepare for bids and
evaluate the bids was burdensome.
C. Early experience in not pre-qualifying PC make and models resulted in
numerous problems. Later efforts to pre-qualify met with only limited
success. Typical low-bid were in what GartnerGroup now calls tier 3.
One major manufacturer went out of business, leaving us with a
number of "orphaned" PC units which could not be upgraded.
v
s
FAHR95-42
Page 8 of 11
October 2, 1995
d. Cost savings were difficult to realize as third-party vendors would
inflate their mark-up to limit their exposure to a highly volatile market
place. Due to the lengthy time span from specification, to bid, to
certification, to award, to delivery -- some items would no longer be
available or prices would change substantially.
2. Staff investigated the methods used by the County of Orange. The County of
Orange used to issue a master contract with a third-party vendor to buy
computer hardware and software on an as-needed basis. This contract would
run 3 years (in part made necessary due to the length of time needed for
negotiation and evaluation prior to contract award or renewal.) The contract
would specify exact models and prices. This method had a number of
failings. First and foremost, it locked in the County to prices which invariably
dropped during the contract period. Most vendors would not be willing to
negotiate for a fixed discount due to the volatility of the market. The only
saving grace is the volume which the County could bring to a fixed discount
contract.
Since the bankruptcy, the County no longer has a master contract but has
used a variety of methods, sharing two contracts with Los Angeles County
and one with Merced County. They have also tried using California Multiple
Award Schedule (see item 4 below). However, due to a lack of County-wide
standards, various departments and agencies have made conflicting demands
which have finally led County GSA to simply solicit the 3 lowest prices from a
list of PC third party vendors and issue the Purchase Order to the lowest.
3. Two types of leasing plans were investigated by IT Department staff. The
first involved a "Operating Lease" which would provide PC units, hardware
support, software support, help desk services, installation, training and asset
management -- all for a fixed price. The Districts would cease to own PC
assets. All PC assets would be established on a 36-month rotation. At the
end of 36 months, the old machine would be returned and replaced by the
latest technology -- with no residual payment.
The second leasing plan was almost identical to the first but the parties would
separate the contracts so that the PC asset lease was a separate instrument
from the Hardware Support and the Help Desk Services. No asset
management or training was included.
a
FAHR95-42
Page 9 of 11
October 2, 1995
Both of these plans were attractive to staff because of the burden that would
be shifted to the vendor. However, in the absence of any tax advantages
(which are not applicable to the Districts), the cost of leasing PC assets is not
cost effective.
4. In January 1995, a new type of cooperative agreement came to the attention
of the IT Department staff. This was the California Multiple Award Schedule,
or CMAS. Our initial interest was focused on a CMAS agreement between
the State of California and Digital Equipment Corporation. Shortly after this,
many other vendors signed similar CMAS agreements with the state, making
this a popular method of acquiring discounts which the Districts could not
otherwise negotiate.
This method shows the most promise to provide a cost-effective way to
eliminate the delays which have hampered the timely acquisition of Personal
Computers for Districts staff. All purchases over $50,000 will be brought to
the Committee and, subsequently, the Joint Boards, for approval.
CURRENT SITUATION
The 1995-96 budget approved by the Joint Boards in June of 1995 provided
funding for the purchase of 171 Personal Computers. In July, the 32 Pentium
Personal Computers, which the Committee placed on hold pending more study, were
valued at $174,942.72. The total number of Personal Computers requested for
immediate purchase now totals 60. This includes the original 32 for Plant
Automation.
Information Technology staff has studied the Gartner Group Tier 1/2 list of vendors
and determined that of the 14 vendors listed:
3 have European sales only
1 has systems not compatible with existing Districts systems
1 (AT&T) has announced a halt to PC production
1 has had difficulty providing quality service locally
1 is not marketing locally
i has no CMAS agreement in force
v
FAHR95-42
Page 10 of 11
October 2, 1995
This leaves 6 recommended vendors who have CMAS contracts: Acer, Compaq,
IBM, Digital, Dell and HP. Using a standard configuration, Information Technology
staff obtained CMAS quotes from each of the six vendors to determine the lowest
priced system for purchase through the CMAS contract.
The 32 systems which were requested in July had an average cost of $5,467.
Following the CMAS pricing of the lowest of the six Gartner-recommended Tier 1/2
vendors, the average price for the same configuration decreased by $1,780 to
$3,687 each. The average cost of the remaining 28 systems are $3,247 each.
(The original 32 systems are for Plant Automation and have a special configuration
and require larger 17-inch monitors, all of which increases the cost.)
RECOMMENDATIONS
Information Technology recommends the following administrative policy:
Budgeting for PC assets shall limit "bump down" shifting of assets to no more
than two levels. This means that a new computer may release the previous
PC to be shifted to another user. That second user's old computer can then
be relocated once. However, if another PC is then "bumped" from the third
user, that PC is deemed to be surplus and will not be reinstalled elsewhere.
User 1 User 2 User 3
New PC ----> Old PC----->Old PC ------>Surplus PC
Information Technology proposes the following four actions for the Committee:
1. It is proposed that the Committee recommend to the Joint Board that the
Districts' policy with regards to standards for PC technology shall be that all
PC technology purchases be limited to the most recent list of tier 1 and tier 2
vendors as defined by GartnerGroup, for both desktop computers and mobile
computers.
2. It is proposed that the Committee recommend to the Joint Boards that the
Districts policy state that, with regards to the purchase of PC technology all
purchasing actions utilize California Multiple Award Schedule (CMAS)
contracts for the purchase of PC technology from among the list of tier 1 and
tier 2 vendors as mentioned in the previous motion.
FAHR95-42
Page 11 of 11
October 2, 1995
Staff will compare CMAS pricing and choose the lowest priced Tier 1 and Tier
2 vendor's configuration applicable to the Districts' needs.
3. Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Dell
Computer, the lowest priced Gartner Tier 1/2 vendor at this time, in a total
amount not to exceed $208,900.00, including sales tax, for the Purchase of
60 Personal Computers and monitors and other associated components
(Specification No. E-261).
4. It is proposed that the Committee direct staff to issue an RFP for Hardware
Maintenance Services and an RFP for Software Help Desk Services. Staff will
evaluate proposals, rank and present their recommendations to the Committee
for award of a Purchase Order for such services.
SHJw
JAWPDOCIFIN\CRANEIFPC.MTGWAHR.95\STAFF.RPT 4RFAHR99.42
C JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
MEETING
AGENDAFOR
OCTOBER 25, 1995
Agenda Item (1 1)(b)(10): FAHR95413 Consideration of Resolution
No. 95-_ authorizing the establishment of
a Relief Operator bonus of$.60 per hour for
employees covered by the Operations and
Maintenance Memorandum of
Understanding.
Summary
The annual overtime cost to operate both treatment plants is currently about $375,000.
Forty-eight percent (48%) of this total, or$180,000, is attributable to holiday coverage
and is currently controlled by operating at minimum staffing levels on holidays. The
remaining fifty-two percent (52%), or $195,000, is caused by employees working
overtime to cover for the scheduled or unscheduled absences of other employees in an
effort to meet minimum staffing requirements.
Overtime costs could be further reduced through use of a relief, or floater, position that
could be assigned to any vacant shift on a regular basis. A Relief Operator bonus offers
an inducement to work this otherwise undesirable and unpredictable shift, which may
vary from mornings one week to nights the following week. Eight such positions at both
plants have the potential of reducing overtime costs by up to $100,000 annually.
Staff Recommendation
Establish a Relief Operator bonus of$0.60 per hour for employees covered by the
Operations and Maintenance Memorandum of Understanding through a Side Letter of
Agreement.
FAHR Committee Recommendation to Executive Committee
The Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee recommends the
Executive Committee approve staff recommendation to establish a Relief Operator
bonus of$0.60 per hour for employees covered by the Operations and Maintenance
Memorandum of Understanding through a Side Letter of Agreement to reduce overtime
costs.
Executive Committee Recommendation to the Joint Boards of Directors
The Executive Committee concurs with the FAHR Committee recommendation.
Dwv�aesoc 11010ZVR
D
October 11, 1995
mm..
STAFF REPORT
FAHR95-43: Operations Overtime Cost Reduction Strategy
Background
Overtime costs attributable to Plant Operations personnel are primarily caused by
holiday coverage and both scheduled and unscheduled time off. While overtime
expenditures have been reduced recently to a great extent through management of
staffing levels on the various shifts, opportunities for further reduction have been
identified.
The annual overtime cost to operate both treatment plants is currently about $375,000,
which is approximately half of what is has been in previous years. Forty-eight percent
(48%) of this total, or$180,000, is attributable to holiday coverage and is currently
controlled by operating at minimum staffing levels on holidays. The remaining fifty-two
percent (52%), or $195,000, is caused by employees working overtime to cover for the
scheduled or unscheduled absences of other employees in an effort to meet minimum
staffing requirements.
Staff has reached an agreement with the Operations and Maintenance bargaining group
Work Issues Committee to the effect that requests for time off will only be approved if
the minimum staffing level has not been reached for the shift in question. Exceptions
may be made in the event of unforeseen circumstances. This strategy is largely
responsible for the reduction in overtime costs from previous levels to the current
$375,000. A further reduction could be realized through use of a relief, or floater,
position that could be assigned to any vacant shift on a regular basis. Eight such
positions at both plants have the potential of reducing overtime costs by up to $100,000
annually.
A Relief Operator bonus offers an inducement to work an otherwise undesirable and
unpredictable shift, which may vary from mornings one week to nights the following
week. The City of Los Angeles utilizes a Relief Operator bonus of$0.60 per hour.
While the Relief Operator concept is not widely used, and therefore survey data is not
helpful, a figure of$0.60 per hour, or about 3 percent, would seem reasonable in light of
the potential savings. The annual cost of offering this bonus to eight employees is
$10,000, balanced against the potential savings of$100,000.
CSDOC 0 P.O.Box 8127 0 Foanleln Val lay.CA 92728-B 127 0 Tel. (714)962.2411 0 FAX(714)062.3954
0
FAHR95-43
Page 2
October 11, 1995
Cost Implication Summary
Current Total Operations Overtime Cost $ 375,000
Amount Attributable to Holidays (fixed) 180,000
Amount Attributable to employee absence 195,000
Cost to Implement Floater Concept 10,000
Potential Reduction in Overtime Costs (100,000)
Projected Total Overtime with Floater 285,000
Net Potential Savings $ 90.000
Staff Recommendation
Establish a Relief Operator bonus of$0.60 per hour for employees covered by the
Operations and Maintenance Memoranda of Understanding through a Side Letter of
Agreement.
GH:Ic
JNWDV.IFWCMNlIFPc.Mlt�i FAHRB'vISIAFF.RVIVWF�HR�.�l
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
OCTOBER 25, 1995
Agenda Item (14): Update re proposed acquisition of County Solid
Waste Management System, and consideration of
the following actions:
(a) Consideration of motion authorizing staff and consultants to conduct
expanded Phase I Assessment Studies on moderate and high exposure
landfill sites, to be done within the previously authorized amount of
$100,000.00.
(b) Consideration of motion authorizing consulting services for Phase II
Assessment Study to determine landfill assets and liabilities for an amount
not to exceed $100,000.00.
(c) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a letter of interest to enter
into negotiations for the purchase of the County of Orange Solid Waste
Management System; and, authorizing an amount not to exceed $100,000.00
in nonrefundable option payments to be applied toward the purchase price.
u ma
The Ad Hoc Committee re Landfill Issues met on October 18 for a presentation by staff
and consultants on the due diligence performed to date. For detailed background
information on the meeting, refer to the draft minutes included in Agenda Item (11)(a).
Staff and our consultants will be presenting additional information at the meeting.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends the following actions at this time:
1. Conduct expanded Phase I assessment studies on moderate and high
exposure sites, which can be done within the existing $100,000 authorization.
2. Authorize an additional $100,000 to delineate Phase II Scope to determine
liability.
3. Authorize the issuance of a letter of interest to enter into negotiations for the
purchase of the County of Orange landfill system, including a $100,000
nonrefundable option payment that can be applied toward the purchase price.
J:IWVOOPB9AGBAOCN '.<
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
OCTOBER 25, 1995
DISTRICT 2
Agenda Item (22): consideration of the following actions relative to
Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer,
Contract No. 2.9-Rl:
(a) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3 to the plans and
specifications for said project, authorizing an addition of$7,398.80 to the contract
with Colich Bros., Inc. dba Colich & Sons, for one item of additional work, and
granting a time extension of 30 calendar days for completion of said additional
work.
(b) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 4 to the plans and
specifications for said project, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities
for a net deduction of$109,637.60 from the contract with Colich Bros., Inc. dba
Colich & Sons.
(c) Consideration of Resolution No. 95- -2, accepting said contract, as complete,
authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout
Agreement for a final total contract amount of$2,657,809.81 (original awarded
contract amount of$2,482,762.00).
Summary
In April 1994, the Directors approved the plans and specifications for Contract No. 2-9-R1,
Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer from Imperial Highway west of Kraemer
Boulevard to the intersection of Yorba Linda Boulevard and Associated Road. This sewer is
used to transport wastewater collected from the collection system of the City of Fullerton to
Treatment Plant No. 1.
This $2.9 million project consists of a new 18-inch ductile iron pipe (DIP), 18-inch vitrified clay
pipe (VCP), 21-inch VCP, 24-inch VCP and 39-inch VCP gravity sewer. The alignment starts at
Yorba Linda Boulevard and Associated Road, continues northerly in Associated Road to the
intersection of Associated Road and Bastenchury Road, turns easterly in Bastanchury Road to
a pint west of 1-57 where it enters the Parkside Apartments complex. The sewer will be installed
in an easement leading north, then turning east and connecting to an existing dry sewer under I-
57. The Alignment continues easterly in Eucalyptus Street and Gilman Park to a point of
connection to the existing subtrunk sewer. Work consists of the construction of laterals,
manholes, service connections, temporary bypass lines and restoration of damaged landscape.
This projects designed by Post, Buckley, Schuh and Jennigan (formerly Church Engineering,
Inc.) and awarded to Colich Bros., dba Colich & Sons in June 1994. This project is now
complete.
If the Directors approve these change orders, the total cast of the change orders to date on this
contract will be $175,047.81. This represents an increase of 7.1% over the original contract
amount. The changes above would have been included in the original design if discovered or
known in the design phase. These changes resulted in a 131 calendar day extension to the
contract work schedule.
(3) Acceptance of Contract as Complete
Colich Bros., Inc. Dba Colich & Sons has fulfilled all contractual obligations within the specified
and extended time.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 3 for an addition of$7,398.80 and 30 calendar
days time extension to the contract, and Change Order No. 4 for an Adjustment of Engineer's
Quantities for a deduction of$109,637.60 with Colich Bros., Inc. dba Colioh & Sons, increasing
the amount of change orders on this contract to $175,047.81 increasing the original contract
amount of$2,482,762.00 to $2,657,809.81; and consideration of the resolution authorizing
acceptance of the work as complete, execution of the final Closeout Agreement and filing of the
Notice of Completion as required.
DC:Idh
ENGWGRRPTSZR1601.95
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
OCTOBER 25, 1995
DISTRICT 2
Agenda Item (22): Consideration of the following actions relative to
Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer,
Contract No. 2-9-R1:
(a) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3 to the plans and
specifications for said project, authorizing an addition of$7,398.80 to the contract
with Colich Bros., Inc. dba Colich & Sons, for one item of additional work, and
granting a time extension of 30 calendar days for completion of said additional
work.
(b) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 4 to the plans and
specifications for said project, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities
for a net deduction of $109,637.60 from the contract with Colich Bros., Inc. dba
Colich & Sons.
(c) Consideration of Resolution No. 95-_-2, accepting said contract, as complete,
authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout
Agreement for a final total contract amount of$2,657,809.81 (original awarded
contract amount of$2,482,762.00).
Summary
In April 1994, the Directors approved the plans and specifications for Contract No. 2.9-R1,
Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer from Imperial Highway west of Kraemer
Boulevard to the intersection of Yorba Linda Boulevard and Associated Road. This sewer is
used to transport wastewater collected from the collection system of the City of Fullerton to
Treatment Plant No. 1.
This$2.9 million project consists of a new 18-inch ductile iron pipe (DIP), 18-inch vitrified Gay
pipe (VCP), 21-inch VCP, 24-inch VCP and 39-inch VCP gravity sewer. The alignment starts at
Yorba Linda Boulevard and Associated Road, continues northerly in Associated Road to the
intersection of Associated Road and Bastenchury Road, turns easterly in Bastanchury Road to
a pint west of 1.57 where it enters the Parkside Apartments complex. The sewer will be installed
in an easement leading north, then turning east and connecting to an existing dry sewer under I-
57. The Alignment continues easterly in Eucalyptus Street and Gilman Park to a point of
connection to the existing subtrunk sewer. Work consists of the construction of laterals,
manholes, service connections, temporary bypass lines and restoration of damaged landscape.
This projects designed by Post, Buckley, Schuh and Jennigan (formerly Church Engineering,
Inc.) and awarded to Colich Bros., dba Colich & Sons in June 1994. This project is now
complete.
y
The following is a summary of the contract amount:
Original Contract Amount $2,482,762.00
Previously Approved Changes $ 227,286.61
Amount of Change Order No. 3 (Add)(Deduel) $ 7,398.80
Amount of Change Order No. 4 (Add)(Deduct) $ (109.637.60)
Amended Contract Amount $2,657,809.81
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 3 for one item of additional work for an
additional$7,398.80, and 30 calendar days time extension, Change Order No. 4 for an
adjustment of engineer's quantities for a deduction of$109,637.60; increasing the total amount
of change orders on this contract to $175,047.81 and increasing the original contract amount of
$2,482,762.00 to $2,657,809.81; and consideration of the resolution authorizing acceptance of
the work as complete, execution of the final Close out Agreement, and file the Notice of
Completion as required.
J:9rpdo WVWgnpbyb100195
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
° nl ORANGE COUNTY. CAUFORNIA
October 25, 1995 1a EUIS AVENUE
eo cox 9+27
FOUWMNVA Ev.LAUFOMM R27Eea+E7
n+a acezA++
STAFF REPORT
DISTRICT 2
Approval of Change Order Nos. 3 and 4 to the Plans and Specifications for Rehabilitation of
Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer,
Contract No. 2-9-RI
and Acceptance of Contract as Complete
Summary
In April 1994, the Directors approved the plans and specifications for Contract No. 2-9-R1,
Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer from Imperial Highway west of Kraemer
Boulevard to the intersection of Yorba Linda Boulevard and Associated Road. This sewer is
used to transport wastewater collected from the collection system of the City of Fullerton to
Treatment Plant No. 1.
The $2.9 million project consists of a new 18-inch ductile iron pipe (DIP), 18-inch vitrified Gay
pipe (VCP), 21-inch VCP, 24-inch VCP, 36-inch VCP and 39-inch VCP gravity sewer. The
alignment starts at Yorba Linda Boulevard and Associated Road, continues northerly in
Associated Road to the intersection of Associated Road and Bastanchury Road, turns easterly in
Bastanchury Road to a point west of 1-57 where it enters the Parkside Apartments complex. The
sewer will be installed in an easement heading north, then turning east and connecting to an
existing dry sewer under 1-57. The alignment continues on the east side of 1-57 entering a
second easement located on private property. The alignment continues easterly in Eucalyptus
Street and Gilman Park to a point of connection to the existing subtrunk sewer. Work consists of
the construction of laterals, manholes, service connections, temporary bypass lines and
restoration of damaged landscape.
(1) Change Order No. 3
Change Order No. 3 is a net addition of$7,398.80 to the contract for one item of added work and
30 calendar days. This project was designed by Post, Buckley, Schuh and Jennigan (formerly
Church Engineering, Inc.) and awarded to Colich Bros., Inc. dba Colich &Sons in June 1994.
Item 1, in the amount of$7,398.80 and 30 calendar days time extension, was for restoration of
Gilman Park in agreement with the City of Fullerton. The wording of the construction notes as
presented by the designer did not completely explain what must be done with the grassy areas
conceming the amount and type of turf restoration after the pipe laying operations were
completed. All parties involved had a different interpretation of what was required. The
Contractor shared in one half of the costs with the Districts.
(2) Change Order No. 4
Change Order No. 4 is the Adjustment of Engineer's Quantities for a net deduction of
$109,637.60.
1
If the Directors approve these change orders, the total cost of the change orders to date on this
contract will be $175,047.81. This represents an increase of 7.1% over the original contract
amount. The changes above would have been included in the original design if discovered or
known in the design phase. These changes resulted in a 131 calendar day extension to the
contract work schedule.
(3) Acceptance of Contract as Complete
Colich Bros., Inc. Dba Colich & Sons has fulfilled all contractual obligations within the specified
and extended time.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 3 for an addition of$7,398.80 and 30 calendar
days time extension to the contract, and Change Order No. 4 for an Adjustment of Engineer's
Quantities for a deduction of$109,637.60 with Colich Bros., Inc. dba Colich & Sons, increasing
the amount of change orders on this contract to $175,047.81 increasing the original contract
amount of$2,482,762.00 to$2,657,809.81; and consideration of the resolution authorizing
acceptance of the work as complete, execution of the final Closeout Agreement and filing of the
Notice of Completion as required.
DC:Idh
ENGIMGRRPTSZR10-01.95
W
Page 1 of 3
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
108U ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Colich Bros. Inc. dba Colich &Sons C.O. No.: Three (3)
Dale: October 25, 1995
Job: Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-R1
Consultant: Post, Buckley. Schuh and Jenniean (formerly Church Engineering Inc.)
Amount of this Change Order(Add)(Dednet) $ 7,398.80
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes In the contract and/or contract
work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or
deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
ITEM 1 -RESTORATION OF GILMAN PARK
The contract required the placement of 18Jnch VCP (Vitrified Clay Pipe)sewer through the entire length of
Gilman Park, City of Fullerton. The wording of the construction notes as presented by the designer did not
completely explain what must be done with the grassy areas concerning the amount and type of turf restoration
after the pipe laying operations were completed. All parties involved (City of Fullerton,Contractor and Districts)
had a different interpretation of what was required. Also in question was proper grade around manholes that
extended above ground level 18-4nches and the grading for proper drainage. The Districts entered into an
agreement w8h the City to resolve the issues and provide a safe area for the public. Fill material was placed
around the manholes and graded with long slopes,a Swale was graded for better drainage,2 inches of top soil
was placed to cover rocky areas and the entire area hydro-seeded with natural grasses. The Contractor agreed to
share the total cost of$14,797.61 with the Districts on a negotiated basis in accordance with Section 10a(8)(2)(a).
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER REM: $7,398.80
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 30 Calendar Days
TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $7,398.80
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 30 Calendar Days
V
Page 2 of 3
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX$127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728.8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Colich Bros. Inc. dba Colich & Sons C.O. No.: Three (3)
Date: October 25 1995
Job: Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-R1
Consultant: Post, Buckley. Schuh and Jennigan (formerly Church Engineering, Inc.)
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work
and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by
this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 30 days extension of
time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no direct or indirect, incidental or
consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except
as expressly granted and approve by this Change Order.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date: June 30, 1994
Original Contract Time: 180 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date: December 27, 1994
Time Extension this C.O.: 30 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension: 131 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time: 311 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date: November 2, 1995
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable
Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable
Original Contract Price $2,482,762.00
Prev. Authorized Changes $ 277,286.61
This Change (Add) (Bednef) $ 7,398.80
Amended Contract Price $2,767,447.41
w
Page 3 of 3
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Colich Bros. Inc. dba Colich &Sons C.O. No.: Three (3)
Date: October 25, 1995
Job: Rehabilitation of Cvoress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-R1
Consultant: Post, Buckley Schuh and Jernigan (formerly Church Engineering, Inc.)
Board Authorization Date: October 25, 1995
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
SubMitted by: _ Re rnrn ded by:
-Z7 - ys
'Engineering Manager Date g6nstruction Manager Date
pro ie Approved a io Fonn:
Director of Engineering Date G ne I Counsel Date
Accepted by:
�COUCH BROS., INC. dba Colich &Sons
Contractor Dale
Page 1 of 4
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Colich Bros., Inc. Dba Colich 8 Sons C.O. No.: Four(4)1
Date: October 25, 1995
Job: Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-R1
Consultant: Post, Buckley. Schuh and Jennigan (formerly Church Engineering, Inc.)
Amount of this Change Order(Add)(Deduct) $(109,637.60)
In accordance with contract provisions, the fallowing changes in the contract and/or contract
work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or
deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
ITEM 1 -ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S QUANTITIES
ADD: Change in Quantity
Item No. Unit Description From To Difference Unit Price Total
15. V. F. 72-inch Concrete 81.00 89.50 8.50 $561.00 4,768.50
Manhole
Subtotal: $ 4,768.50
DEDUCT: Change in Quantity
Item No. Unit Description From To Difference Unit Price Total
12. E.A. 8x14 Concrete W. 1.00 0.00 1.00 $22,500.00 $(22,500.00)
13. V. F. 844nch Concrete 69.00 33.30 35.70 $ 835.00 $(29,809.50)
Manhole
17. V. F. 604nch Concrete 238.00 213.30 24.70 $ 573.00 $(14,153.10)
Manhole
18. V. F. 604nch Concrete 17.00 15.50 1.50 $ 729.00 $( 1,093.50)
Drop Manhole
27. EA. Remove exist.84- 1.00 0.00 1.00 $2,500.00 $(2,500.00)
Inch Concrete Manhole
33. C.Y. Concrete Encas. 150.00 132.00 18.00 $ 75.00 $( 1,350.00)
43. C.Y. Crushed Rock 1000.00 0.00 1000.00 $ 20.00 $(20,000.00)
0 to 12 inches
v
Page 2 of 4
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Colich Bros., Inc. Dba Colich & Sons C.O. No.; Four(4))
Date: October 25, 1995
Job: Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Sublrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-Rl
Consultant: Post Buckley. Schuh and Jennigan (fonnedy Church Engineering, Inc.)
ITEM 1 -ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S QUANTITIES(con8nued)
44. C.Y. Crushed Rock 500.00 0.00 500.00 $ 22.00 $(11,000.00)
12 to 24 inches
45. C.Y. Crushed Rock 500.00 0.00 500.00 $ 24.00 $(12,000.00)
Subtotal $(114,406.10)
CREDIT COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $(114,406.10)
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
TOTAL CREDIT COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $(109,637.60)
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days
l
o Page 3 of 4
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Colich Bros., Inc. Dba Colich & Sons C.O. No.: Four(4)1
Date: October 25, 1995
Job: Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer Contract No. 2-9-R1
Consultant: post Buckley Schuh and Jennigan (formerly Church Engineering Inc.)
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed Incidental to the prime work and within
the time within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and
all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time for this Change Order,and no
direct or indirect,Incidental or consequential costs,expenses,losses or damages have been or will be incurred by
Contractor,except, as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date: June 30, 1994
Original Contract Time: 180 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date: December 27, 1994
Time Extension this C.O.: 0 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension: 131 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time: 311 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date: Novbember 2, 1995
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable
Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable
Original Contract Price $2,482,762.00
Prev.Authorized Changes $ 284,685.41
This Change(Add) (Deduct) $ (109,637,601
Amended Contract Price $2,657 809.81
1
a
Page 4 of 4
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Colich Bros., Inc. Oba Colich & Sons C.O. No.: Four(4))
Date: October 25. 1995
Job: Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtmnk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-R1
Consultant: Post, Buckley. Schuh and Jennigan (formedy Church Engineering, Inc.)
Board Authorization Date:October 25, 1995
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA
Sub i8ed by: / �y e t t ended by—
l/ Li-1-s
gineedng Manager Date Pbnalruclion M stager Date
ppra e y Appr�r tlarqt Form:
hector o Engineenng Date Genera W ounsel Date
Accepted by:
COUCH BROS.INC.,dba COUCH &SONS
2 v1--% S
Contractor ate
u
g JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
OCTOBER 25, 1995
DISTRICTS 6. 7. and 14
Agenda Item (29): consideration of the following actions relative to Baker-
Gisler Interceptor,from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1,
Contract No. 14-1-1A:
(a) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications for
said project, authorizing an addition of$39,734.90 to the contract with Mladen Buntich
Construction Co., Inc., for five items of additional work, and granting a time extension of
33 calendar days for completion of said additional work.
(b) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 4 to the plans and specifications for
said project, authorizing of$209,090.78 to the contract with Mladen Buntich Construction
Co., Inc. for nine items of additional work, and granting a time extension of 39 calendar
days for completion of said additional work.
(c) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 5 to the plans and specifications for
said project, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a net addition of
$36,059.00 to the contract with Mladen Buntich Construction Co., Inc.
(d) Consideration of Resolution No. 95- , accepting said contract as complete, authorizing
execution of Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement for a final total
contract amount of$8,810,715.81 (original awarded contract amount of$8,278,963.00).
Summary
This$8.27 million project, located within the City of Costa Mesa between Fairview Road at
Baker Street and the Santa Ana River, was designed by Boyle Engineering Corporation and
provides for the construction of a 90-inch reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) sewer, approximately
10,500 feet long and 760 feet of 6' x 8' reinforced concrete box sewer through Mesa Verde
Country Club (MVCC), 1000-feet of 33-inch VCP.
Since the formation of County Sanitation District No. 14, Sanitation Districts Nos. 6, 7, and 14
have been working towards the completion of a joint conveyance system that will deliver
wastewater from the communities of Irvine, Costa Mesa, and Santa Ana to the Fountain Valley
Reclamation Plant No. 1. To date, four of the six construction contracts (from Bristol Street to
Fairview Road, Contract No. 14-1-13; Main Street to Bristol Street, Contract No. 14-1-2; and
two in the vicinity of the Santa Ana River, Contract Nos. 14-1-1A-1 and 14-1-tA-2) have been
completed.
v
S
The two remaining projects include this contract, Contact No. 14-1-1A which is scheduled to be
completed by September 1995 and a future District No. 6 collector, Contract No. 6-12 extending
southerly in Fairview Road from the Paularino Channel just south of Baker Street to Wilson
Street. Design for Contract No. 6-12 is essentially complete, and is scheduled for construction
sometime in 1996. Change Order No. 3, is an addition of$39,734.90 to the contract for six
items of additional work and a thirty-three day time extension. Change Order No. 4 is an
addition of$209,090.78 to the contract for nine items of additional work and a thirty-nine
calendar day time extension. Change Order No. 5 is the Adjustment of Engineer's quantities for
an increase of$36,059.00. This contract was awarded on February 2, 1994 to Mladen Buntich
Construction Co., Inc.
The following is a summary of the contract amount:
Original Contract Amount $8,278,983.00
Previously Approved Changes $ 246,848.13
Amount of Change Order No. 3 (Add)(Dedus $ 39,734.90
Amount of Change Order No. 4 (Add)(9educt) $ 209,090.78
Amount of Change Order No. 5 (Add)(DeducF) $ 36,059.00
Amended Contract Amount $8,810,715.81
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 3 for six items of additional work for an
additional $39,734.90, and 33 calendar days time extension, Change Order No. 4 for nine items
of additional work for an additional $209,090.78 and 39 Calendar days time extension, and
Change Order No. 5 for an adjustment of engineer's quantities for an additional $36,059.00 ;
increasing the total amount of change orders on this contract to$531,732.81 and increasing the
original contract amount of$8,278,983.00 to $8,810,715.81; and consideration of the resolution
authorizing acceptance of the work as complete, execution of the final Close out Agreement,
and file the Notice of Completion as required.
J:twP00C1aS1A G95W CTMl429.WP0
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
i FI ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
October 25, 1995 1084A ELUS AVENUE
F0.BOX 0127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA U729.8127
11tne82-2411
STAFF REPORT
Proposed Chance Order Nos. 3. 4 and 5 to the Plans and Specifications
Faker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1
Contract No. 14-1-1A
And Acceptance of the Contract as Complete
Summary
This$8.27 million project, located within the City of Costa Mesa between Fairview Road at
Baker Street and the Santa Ana River,was designed by Boyle Engineering Corporation and
provides for the construction of a 90-inch reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) sewer, approximately
10,500 feet long and 760 feel of 6'x 8' reinforced concrete box sewer through Mesa Verde
Country Club (MVCC).
Since the formation of County Sanitation District No. 14, Sanitation Districts Nos. 6, 7, and 14
have been working towards the completion of a joint conveyance system that will deliver
wastewater from the communities of Irvine, Costa Mesa, and Santa Ana to the Fountain Valley
Reclamation Plant No. 1. To date, four of the six construction contract (from Bristol Street to
Fairview Road, Contract No. 14-1-1 B; Main Street to Bristol Street, Contract No. 14-1-2; and
two in the vicinity of the Santa Ana River, Contract Nos. 14-1-1A-1 and 14-1-1A-2) have been
completed.
The two remaining projects include this contract, Contract No. 14-1-1A which is scheduled to be
completed by September 1995 and a future District 6 collector, Contract No. 6-12 extending
southerly in Fairview Road from the Paularino Channel just south of Baker Street to Wilson
Street. Design for Contract No. 6-12 is essentially complete, and is scheduled for construction
sometime in 1996. This contract was awarded on February 2, 1994 to Mladen Buntich
Construction Company, Inc.
(1) Chance Order No. 3
Change Order No. 3 is a net amount of$39,734.90 to the contract for six items of added work
and thirty three calendar days. This project was designed by Boyle Engineering Corporation
and awarded to Mladen Buntich Construction Company, Inc. In February 1994.
Item 1, in the amount of$11,583.00 is for the use of security guard at the gate entrance to Plant
No. 1 along Garfield Avenue during hauling operations. Construction staff was directed to use a
guard by the Safety and Health Department for security reasons. This was an ongoing
requirement throughout the entire hauling time frame for excavating materials that were either
stored or used for blending and then hauled to work site for backfill.
Item 2, in the amount of$12,357.94 is for slurry work at various street locations that were
requested by the City of Costa Mesa.
Item 3, in the amount of$1,736.42 and 1 calendar day is for modification and reconnection of
an existing sewer lateral that was not shown on the contract drawings.
Item 4, in the amount of$6,057.54 and 3 calendar days is for the installation of special ductile ,
ironfdting that was required to avoid a utility conflict. The as-built drawings did not accurately
show the profile of the 12-inch water line.
Item 5, in the amount of$8,000.00 and 3 calendar days is for the removal of a temporary 24-
inch ductile iron bypass and the tie-in of an existing 8-inch VCP through a manhole cone section
that was removed. This work was done to accommodate the City of Costa Mesa's Orange
County Fair schedule which forced the Contractor to demobilize prior to the completion of his
scheduled work.
Item 6, is for a time extension of 26 calendar days for delays imposed on the Contractor to
accommodated the City of Costa Mesa's fair schedule.
Items 3 and 4 are design errors related to contract drawings that failed to correctly incorporate
in existing as-built information. This is due in part to insufficient as-built information provided by
other agencies and utilities. Items 1 and 2 are for changes that would have been included in the
original design if discovered or known in the design phase. Item 5 was for an unforseen
condition (local agency requirement)which would have been included in the original design if
discovered or known in the design phase.
(2) Change Order No. 4
Change Order No. 4 is a net amount of$209,090.78 to the contract for nine items of added work
and 39 calendar days.
Item 1, in the amount of$5,130.86 and one calendar day is for a utility conflict with a 21-inch
storm drain lateral not shown on the contract drawings.
Item 2, in the amount of$19,512.75 and 3 calendar days is for a change in the method of
construction (e.g. use of a sand cement slurry for backfill and maintaining access to both Taco
Bell driveways simultaneously for ingress and egress) as requested by both Taco Bell and the
City of Costa Mesa.
Item 3, in the amount of$24,800.00 and 6 calendar days is for the installation of two new 64
inch manholes that were not included in the schedule of prices as a bid item. Contract
documents provided payment for 48-inch, 78-inch and 84-inch manholes only.
Item 4, in the amount of$1,550.11 and one calendar day is for construction delays incurred due
to damage to three PVC irrigation lines not disclosed on the contract documents.
Item 5, in the amount of$45,000.00 and 16 calendar days is for premature demobilization costs
and remobilization costs incurred to accommodate Orange County Fair schedule. The majority
of the extra costs are for unabsorbed overhead.
Item 6, in the amount of$96,000.00 and 12 calendar days is for the additional hauling costs
associated with excess fill material that was not used on the Mesa Verde Country Club property
(sixth hole). Mesa Verde Country Club revised their rough grading plan requirements after
award of the contract.
Item 7, in the amount of$7,237.67 is for additional permanent striping required by the City of
Costa Mesa which was outside the contract scope of work.
Item 8, in the amount of$6,859.39 and 3 calendar days is for the reconnection of a 6-inch VCP
service lateral from an existing manhole on a 27-inch VCP line to be abandoned and lie it into
an existing manhole on a 15-inch VCP line. This lateral was not shown on the contract
drawings.
Item 9, in the amount of$3,000.00 and one calendar day is for the repair of a damaged
telephone conduit that was not properly indicated on the contract document.
Items 1, 4, 8 and 9 are for design errors related to the contract drawings that failed to correctly
incorporate existing as-built information. This is due in part to insufficient as-built information
provided by other agencies and/or utilities. Items 2 and 5 were for unforseen conditions (local
agency requirements)which could have been included in the original design if known or
discovered in the design phase. Items 3, 6, and 7 are for changes that would have been
included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase.
(3) Chance Order No. 5
Change Order No. 5 is the Adjustment of Engineer's Quantities for a net increase of$36,059.00.
If the Directors approve these change orders, the total cost of the change orders to date on this
contract will be $531,732.81. This represents an increase of 6.14% over the original contract
amount. These changes resulted in a 147 calendar day time extension to the contract work
schedule.
(4) Acceptance of the Contract as Complete
Mladen Buntich Construction Company, Inc. has fulfilled all contractual obligations within the
specified and extended time.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 3 for an addition of$39,734.90 and 33
calendar days time extension to the contract, Change Order No. 4 for an addition of
$209,090.78 and 39 calendar days time extension to the contract and Change Order No. 5 for
an Adjustment of Engineer's Quantities for an increase of$36,059.00 with Malden Buntich
Construction Company, Inc. Increasing the amount of change orders on this contract to
$531,732.81, increasing the original contract amount of$8,278,983.00 to $8,810,715.81 and
consideration of the resolution authorizing acceptance of the work as complete, execution of the
final closeout agreement and filing of the Notice of Completion as required.
wg0ngrrpWzr1002.95
Page 1 of 5
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Mladen Buntich Construction Co., Inc C.O. No.: Three (3)
Date: October 25, 1995
Job: Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-1A
Consultant: Boyle Engineering Corooration
Amount of this Change Order(Add)(Beduct) $ 39,734.90
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract
work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or
deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
ITEM 1 -USE OF SECURITY GUARD AT PLANT NO. 1 SOUTH ENTRANCE
The Contractor via Staff was directed by the Safety and Health Department to provide a security guard
at the gate entrance along Garfield Avenue (southeast comer) on an as needed basis during dirt
hauling operations. This item is a continuation of Item 9, Change Order No. 1. Per contract
documents, the Contractor was allocated a three-acre site on Districts's Plant No. 1 property for
storage and blending of dirt for backfill. The time frame covered by this item was between
November 1, 1994 through July 30, 1995. This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force
account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO#6)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $11,583.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 2- SLURRY SEAL AT VARIOUS STREET LOCATIONS
The Contractor was directed to slurry seal street areas that had been removed and replaced and had
bad spots or scratches. The total slurry seal footage was approximately 296,530 square feet. Gisler
Avenue which had significant street repairs represented nearly 80% of the total slurry scope. There
was a 50% -50% cost participation agreement between the Contractor and the Districts for Gisler .
Avenue between Washington Avenue and Cinnamon Avenue. The balance of the areas to be slurried
were the exclusive responsibility of either the District or the Contractor. The invoice unit price for the
one coat Type II road slurry seal was 7.5 cents per square foot, which included traffic control. The City
of Costa Mesa identified and directed specific areas to be slurried. This item of work was
accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $12,357.94
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
r
Page 2 of 5
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Mladen Suntich Construction Co.. Inc C.O. No.: Three (3)
Date: October 25, 1995
Job: Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-IA
Consultant: Boyle Engineering Corporation
ITEM 3 - MODIFICATION OF EXISTING SEWER LATERALS
The Contractor was directed to modify an existing 6-inch PVC sewer lateral at Station 110+90 that was
not shown on the contract drawings. The line had to be cut just outside the trench zone to allow for
placement of soldier beams for shoring. After the 90-inch RCP joint sections were installed, a new
8-foot section of 6-inch PVC had to be reinstalled and connected to an existing 8-inch line. This item of
work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 1l)-6(B)2(b) of the General
Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 8 1,736.42
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 1 Calendar Day
ITEM 4- UTILITY CONFLICT WITH EXISTING 12-INCH WATERLINE AND STORM DRAIN
LATERAL AT THE PAULARINO CHANNEL AREA
The Contractor was directed to use a special ductile iron pipe fitting with a 22 114 degree bend to
achieve the deflection required to avoid a conflict with an existing 12-inch CML (concrete mortar lined)
and CSP (coated steel pipe) Mesa Consolidated waterline. This waterline had a drop section that was
designed to transition below an existing 7-feet x 4 1/2 feet storm drain and this was not shown on the
plans. After potholing and exposing the above referenced 12-inch line, it was determined that the
design grade for the 21-feet of 24-inch VCP that was to be installed between the two new manholes in
the area (Station No. 8+79 to 8+97.50) could not be achieved with standard 6-foot joints. Initially, Staff
proposed using special VCP mitered joints to avoid the conflict, but further excavation uncovered an
unmarked 24-inch RCP storm drain lateral that forced the Contractor to use the aforementioned 22 1/4
ductile iron pipe fitting. In addition, the Contractor was directed to use slurry to encase the ductile iron
pipe to achieve additional lateral support. This Rem was accomplished by Contractor's force account
pursuant to Section 10-6(8)(2)(b) of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 6,057.54
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM : 3 Calendar Days
Page 3 of 5
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 EWS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Mladen Buntich Construction Co.. Inc C.O. No.: Three (3)
Date: October 25, 1995
Job: Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-1A
Consultant: Boyle Ennineering Corporation
ITEM 5- REMOVAL OF THE TEMPORARY 24-INCH DUCTILE IRON BYPASS AND
INSTALLATION OF 8-INCH VCP THROUGH EXISTING MANHOLE SHAFT
The Contractor was directed to remove a 30-foot temporary 24-inch ductile iron bypass and install an
8-inch VCP through the cone area of an existing manhole that was removed (Station No. 143+15). At
the fime of the bypass installation for the existing 30-inch VCP crossing the trench of the new 90-inch
RCP, its removal was contingent upon the completion of all tie-ins at the Paulanno Channel (Station
No. 8+79). Prior to completing these tie-ins, the Contractor was directed to abide by scheduling
constraints imposed by the City of Costa Mesa to accommodate the Orange County Fair schedule. All
open excavations had to be backfilled and resurfaced, temporary traffic detour striping was removed
and permanent stripping was installed. This hem of work was accomplished by Contractor's force
account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $8,000.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 3 Calendar Days
ITEM 6 -TIME EXTENSION
Pursuant to the contract documents, the Contractor is entitled to be granted time extensions to the
contract for delays that have been contributed to on the part of the Districts. Due to a City of Costa
Mesa request to cease all construction on Fairview and Baker to accommodate the Orange County
Fair schedule, the Contractor was forced to demobilize and remobilize between July 6, 1995 and
July 31, 1995. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)(2)(a)
of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $0.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 26 Calendar Days
TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $39,734.90
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 33 Calendar Days
Page 4 of 5
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Mladen Buntich Construction Co.. Inc C.O. No.: Three (3)
Date: October 25, 1995
Job: Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1. Contract No. 14-1-1A
Consultant: Boyle Enoineerino Corooration
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work
and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by
this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 33 day extension of
time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no direct or indirect, incidental or
consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except
as expressly granted and approve by this Change Order.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date: February 2, 1994
Original Contract Time: 480 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date: May 27, 1995
Time Extension this C.O.: 33 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension: 108 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time: 588 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date: September 12. 1995
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable
Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable
Original Contract Price $ 8,278,983.00
Prev. Authorized Changes $ 246,848.13
This Change (Add) (Beduet) $ 39,734.90
Amended Contract Price $ 8,565,566.03
Page 5 of 5
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Mladen Bunlich Construction Co.. Inc C.O. No.: Three (3)
Date: October 25, 1995
Job: Baker-Gisler Interceptor. from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1. Contract No. 14-1-1A
Consultant: Boyle Engineering Corporation
Board authorization Date: September 27, 1995
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Submitter by:
�L Re ended by:
gineering Manager Date Wristruction Manager Date
pro ed Approved as f Form:
o-Io- r d a
Director of Engineering Date Gene I MUK'N Date
Accepted by:
MLA,/ EN�BUU,,NTICH CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.
�
Contractor Aate
Page 1 of 7
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Mladen Buntich Construction Co.. Inc C.O. No.: Four(4)
Date: October 25, 1995
Job: Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1 Contract No. 14-1-1A
Consultant: Boyle Engineering Corporation
Amount of this Change Order (Add)(Dedue!) $ 209,090.78
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes In the contract and/or contract
work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or
deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
ITEM 1 -UTILITY CONFLICT WITH EXISTING 21-INCH RCP STORM DRAIN
Contractor was directed to hand dig around an existing 21inch storm drain that was not shown on the contract
documents during the installation of a 214nch VCP line between a new manhole at Station 8+80.50 and to a bein
point for an existing 21-inch VCP located in the EMA right-of-way area. After hand digging was completed,
Contractor backfilled the trench with a sand cement slurry, because of the space limitations for mechanical
compaction. This Rem of work was accomplished by Contractors force amount pursuant to Section 16E(B)2(a)
of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $5,130.86
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 1 Calendar Day
ITEM 2 - EXTRA WORK PERFORMED IN FRONT OF TACO BELL ON FAIRVIEW TO MAINTAIN
ACCESS ON FAIRVIEW TO MAINTAIN ACCESS DURING CONSTRUCTION
Contractor was directed to maintain simultaneous access to Taco Bell entrance and exit during
construction of 33"VCP on Fairview near the Paularino Channel. Plans and specifications call for one
driveway to remain open at all times. Due to the amount of vehicular traffic at Taw Bell, and the
inability of its drive thru to operate with only one open driveway, the City of Costa Mesa and the Taco
Bell management requested the Districts express cooperation in this matter. The Contractorwas
directed to change his method of construction, thereby maintaining access to both driveways.
Contractor used additional gagmen, dumptrucks without trailers, and an excavator to lay the VCP. In
addition, the Contractor was directed to backfill with a 1 sack sand cement slurry to minimize
construction traffic in from of Taw Bell and to haul away additional displaced material. This item of
work was accomplished by Contractor's form account pursuant to Section 10-6(8)2(b) of the General
Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $19,512.75
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 3 Calendar Days
Page 2 of 7
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Mladen Buntich Construction Co.. Inc C.O. No.: Four(41
Date: October 25, 1995
Job: Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1. Contract No. 14-1-1A
Consultant: Boyle Enaineering Corporation
ITEM 3- INSTALLATION OF TWO 60-INCH MANHOLES IN EMA RIGHT-OF-WAY
Contractor was directed to install two new 60-inch manholes as shown on contract Drawing Sht. 30 of
51. These manholes were installed on a force account basis due to the fact that the schedule of prices
did not provide a bid item for this scope of work. Drawing No. 30 is titled "Abandonment of Trunk
Sewer", which would be part of the scope of work for bid item No. 20 which includes the abandonment
of manholes. As stated above, no reference was made to the installation of the subject two new 60-
inch manholes. In addition, the Contractor was directed to build two 2-feet, 21-inch stubouts with
Caulder couplings on each side of a new manhole along with one 4-foot make-up piece over an
existing 21-inch VCP line. The dry 21-inch VCP line, (Station 11+51.02, Contract 6-11) that was to be
tied into the new manhole had to be modified accordingly. This item of work was accomplished by
Contractors force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $24,800.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 6 Calendar Days
ITEM 4- CONSTRUCTION DELAY FOR DAMAGE TO IRRIGATION LINES NOT SHOWN ON
CONTRACT DOCUMENTS
During the installation of the 90-inch RCP interceptor at the south entrance to the Sanwa Bank property
the Contractor damaged a set of irrigation lines that were not shown on the contract drawings. As a
result of the water line break the Contractors trench flooded out and his crews were delayed while
securing the trench. This item of work was accomplished by Contractors force account pursuant to
Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $1,550.11
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM : 1Calendar Day
Page 3 of 7
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
108"ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Mladen Buntich Construction Co.. Inc C.O. No.: Four(4)
Date: October 25, 1995
Job: Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-1A
Consultant: Boyle Engineering Corooration
ITEM 5- DEMOBILIZATION AND REMOBILIZATION COSTS INCURRED TO ACCOMMODATE
ORANGE COUNTY FAIR SCHEDULE
The City of Costa Mesa requested that the District's Contractor cease all construction activities on
Fairview and Baker to minimize traffic disruption during the Orange County Fair between July 6, 1995
and July 23, 1995. As a result the Contractor incurred demobilization and remobilization costs by being
forced to secure all trenches prior to completing all required contract work. To meet the July 6, 1995
start date deadline, the Contractor began backfilling, installed traffic loop wiring, paved and re-striped
for approximately two weeks prior to the fair starting date of July 7, 1995. The majority of extra costs
incurred by the Contractor are for unabsorbed home office overhead with the balance for items such as
trailer and yard rental, standby cost for equipment, and for demobilization and remobilization costs for
manpower and equipment. The balance of the time extension for this item was included in Change
Order No. 2, Item 7 (26 Calendar Days). This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force
account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $45,000.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 16 Calendar Days
ITEM 6 -ADDITIONAL EXPORT OF FILL MATERIAL NOT REQUIRED FOR ROUGH GRADING
AT MESA VERDE COUNTRY CLUB PROPERTY(SIXTH HOLE)
The contract documents stated that the Contractor was to deliver 23,000 cubic yards of excess
excavated material from other locations along the project to the 6th hole of the Mesa Verde County
Club property for rough grading requirements, (Reference: Sheet 37 of the plan documents). After the
contract was bid, staff determined that the final rough grading contours had been revised. At the
completion of the rough grading and re-seeding work for the golf course, staff performed a final survey
to ascertain the actual earthwork grading volume to be 16,728 cubic yards of fill. Therefore,
approximately 7,600 cubic yards (including expansion factor) of excess material had to be permanently
removed from the project. Contractors additional haul-off costs consisted of transport costs to haul off
excess fill material directly off the project, trahsport costs to haul and stockpile material at Plant No. 1
blending and mixing site, and extra costs to load and haul excess material from Plant No. 1 to a
permanent site, representing approximately two hours per load for hauling cost, including equipment
loading costs. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a)of
the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $96,000.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 12 Calendar Days
Page 4 of 7
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Mladen Buntich Construction Co.. Inc C.O. No.: Four(4)
Date: October 25, 1995
Job: Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1. Contract No. 14-1-1A
Consultant: Boyle Engineering Corporation
ITEM 7 - ADDITIONAL PERMANENT STRIPING REQUIRED ON GISLER AVENUE, BAKER STREET
AND HARBOR BOULEVARD
At the conclusion of the Contractor's paving and slurry scope of work, the City of Cost Mesa released
their final permanent striping plans to District's staff. After a review of these plans, it was determined
there was a change of condition as opposed to a restoration of all damaged striping to its original
configuration. The extra costs incurred by the Contractor consisted of the following: 6-inch bike lane
striping with legends, 4-inch white edge lines, and minor miscellaneous items. For the replacement
permanent striping (restoration to original configuration) the District staff negotiated an agreement to
absorb 25% of these costs with the Contractor incurring the balance of the costs, or 75%. This item of
work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Seection 10.6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $7,237.67
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 8- RECONNECTION OF A 6-INCH VCP SERVICE LATERAL FROM AN EXISTING MANHOLE
TO BE ABANDONED TO AN EXISTING 15-INCH VCP LINE
On Baker Street, approximately 100-feet east of Fairview Road, the Contractor was performing
abandonment work in place for the scope of work defined by bid item No. 20. At this location a 6-inch
VCP lateral service connection was found in a manhole on an existing 27-inch VCP line to be
abandoned. This service lateral was not shown on the contract documents. The Contractor was
directed to disconnect the 6-inch lateral from the existing manhole and tie-in the lateral into an adjacent
15-inch VCP line via core drilling. After completing the tie-in the Contractor backfilled around the
manhole and placed an asphalt cap, and re-channeled an existing City manhole to maintain proper flow
between the City and District's facilities. This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force
account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $6,859.39
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 3 Calendar Days
Page 5 of 7
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 EWS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9272MI27
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Mladen Buntich Construction Co.. Inc C.O. No.: Four (4)
Date: October 25. 1995
Job: Baker-Gisler Interceptor. from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-1A
Consultant: Boyle Engineering Corporation
ITEM 9 - REPAIR OF DAMAGED TELEPHONE CONDUIT
At approximate Station 82+70, the Contractor damaged a Pacific Bell Telephone conduit while
excavating for the 90-inch RCP installation. The profile of the contract documents showed one
conduit, but a second conduit (which was damaged)was not shown on the plans nor was it indicated
by USA markings in the field. Pacific Bell did not properly mark their lines nor did they indicate the
number of conduits present per Section 4216.2 of the USA, California one call law. The majority of the
costs for this change order item is for the reimbursement of an invoice from Pacific Bell for repairs to
the subject second conduit. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to
Section 10.6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $3,000.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 1 Calendar Day
TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $209,090.78
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 39 Calendar Days
Page 6 of 7
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Mladen Buntich Construction Co.. Inc C.O. No.: Four(4)
Date: October 25 1995
Job: Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1. Contract No. 14-1-1A
Consultant: Boyle Engineering Corporation
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work
and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by
this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 39 day extension of
time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no direct or indirect, incidental or
consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except
as expressly granted and approve by this Change Order.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date: February 2, 1994
Original Contract Time: 480 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date: May 27, 1995
Time Extension this C.O.: 39 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension: 147 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time: 627 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date: October 21, 1995
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable
Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable
Original Contract Price $ 8,278,983.00
Prev. Authorized Changes $ 286,583.03
This Change (Add) (Bednet) $ 209,090.78
Amended Contract Price $ 8,774,656.81
Page 7 of 7
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
108"EUJS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CAUFORNIA 927284127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Mladen Buntich Construction Co.. Inc C.O. No.: Four(4)
Date: October 25. 1995
Job: Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1. Contract No, 14-1-1A
Consultant: Boyle Enaineerina Corporation
Board authorization Date: October 25, 1995
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY,CAUFORNIA
Submitted by. Re mended by:
.art A)1v4-S �f to-9--pr
ngineering Manager 'Date06nstruction Manager Date
A v d y!'r.� Ap ved a o Form:
�( !/ Q /o-basis
Director of Engineering Date Gene Counsel Date
Accepted by.
M EN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.
o Day
Contractor ate
e
Page 1 of 3
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
108"ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9272"127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Mladen Buntich Construction Co.. Inc. C.O. No.: Five (5))
Date: October 25, 1995
Job: Baker-Gisler Interceptor from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1. Contract No. 14-1-1A
Consultant: Boyle Engineering Corooration
Amount of this Change Order(Add)(Deduet) $36,059.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract
work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or
deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
ITEM 1 -ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S QUANTITIES
ADD: Change in Quantity
Item No. Unit Description From To Difference Und Price Total
12. V.F. 724nch Concrete 73.00 128.67 55.67 $1100.00 $61,237.00
Manhole
SUBTOTAL: $61,237.00
DEDUCT: Change in Quantity
Item No. Unit Description From TO Difference Unit Price Total
it. V. F. 84-inch Concrete 391.00 374.36 16.64 $ 950.00 $(15,808.00)
Manhole
13. V.F. 484nch Concrete 94.00 92.10 1.90 $ 300.00 $( 570.00)
Manhole
29. C.Y. Crushed Rock 500.00 390.00 110.00 $ 20.00 $( 2,200.00)
0- 12 Inches
30. C.Y. Crushed Rock 500.00 200.00 300.00 $ 22.00 $( 6,600.00)
SUBTOTAL: $(25,178.00)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $36,059.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $36,059.00
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days
e
Page 2 of 3
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Mladen Buntich Construction Co.. Inc. C.O. No.: Five (5)1
Dale: October 25, 1995
Job: Baker-Gisler Interceptor from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1. Contract No. 14-1-1A
Consultant: Boyle Enoineerino Corporation
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed Incidental to the prime work and within
the time within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and
all previously issued Change Orders. it is therefore mutually agreed that no time for this Change Order,and no
direct or indirect,Incidental or consequential costs,expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by
Contractor,except,as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date: Febmary 2, 1994
Original Contract Time: 480 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date: May 27, 1995
Time Extension this C.O.: 0 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension: 147 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time: 627 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date: October 21, 1995
Tme Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable
Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable
Original Contract Price $8,278,983.00
Prev.Authorized Changes $ 495,673.81
This Change (Add)(Deduct) $ 36,059.00
Amended Contract Pdce $8,810,715.81
Page 3 of 3
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Mladen Buntich Construction Co.. Inc. C.O. No.: Five (5))
Date: October 25. 1995
Job: Baker-Gisler Interceptor from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1. Contract No. 14-1-1A
Consultant: Boyle Enaineerina Corooration
Board Authorization Date:October 25,1995
COUNTY SAWATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA
Submitt@d by: Rec9lipmanded by:
elf q D {. /o-r 9s
ngineering Manager Date C nstrucdon Manager Date
pro ad Approve to Fo :
• Al is yf oQ �
Director of Engineering Date General Co Cov"w Date
Accepted by:
MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.
Date' o
Contractor
SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
REGULAR MEETING
OCTOBER 25, 1995 -7:30 P.M.
In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2,
this agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the Districts'Administrative Offices not less
I than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each
[ agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary.
In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the
Committee for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b)
as an emergency item or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the
I attention of the Committee subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a i
I supplemental agenda posted in the manner as above, not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting
date.
(17) ALL DISTRICTS
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any:
(a) Consideration of motion authorizing consideration of Item (17)(c) listed
below which arose subsequent to the posting of the agenda and which
requires action at this time pursuant to authority of Government Code
Section 54954.2(b)(2).
(b) Verbal report of General Counsel
(c) Consideration of motion to receive and file Summons and Complaint for
Inverse Condemnation, Edward T. Reid vs. County Sanitation Districts of
Orange County, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 752065, in
connection with the Santa Ana River widening project with the County of
Orange, and authorize the Districts' General Counsel to appear and
defend the interests of the Districts.
J:WJPDO WW3951sklo
JOINT CHAIRMAN'S REPORT
JOINT BOARD MEETING OF
OCTOBER 25, 1995
1 . THE CASA FALL TECHNICAL MEETING IS SCHEDULED
FOR NOVEMBER 16TH AND 17TH IN IRVINE AT THE
HYATT REGENCY. IF YOU PLAN TO ATTEND, PLEASE
LET JEAN, THE GENERAL MANAGER'S SECRETARY,
KNOW NO LATER THAN NOVEMBER 1 .
2. FOR THOSE WHO WERE UNABLE TO ATTEND THE
LAST TOUR OF PLANT 2, THERE IS ANOTHER ONE
SCHEDULED FOR SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 18. IF YOU
WOULD LIKE TO ATTEND, PLEASE CONTACT CLARICE
MARCIN, THE OMTS COMMITTEE SECRETARY.
3. THE MEETINGS SCHEDULED FOR NOVEMBER ARE:
A. THE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND
TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE ON
WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 1 AT 5:30 P.M.
B. PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION
COMMITTEE ON THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 2 AT
5 P.M. WE WILL BE MEETING AT THE
OPERATIONS CENTER AT PLANT 2 FOR A TOUR,
FOLLOWED BY A LIGHT DINNER AND THE
MEETING IN THE TRAINING ROOM OF THE
OPERATIONS CENTER.
C. THE FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN
RESOURCES COMMITTEE WILL MEET ON
WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 8 AT 5:30 P.M. DINNER
WILL FOLLOW THIS MEETING.
D. THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE WILL ALSO MEET ON
WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 8 AT 7 P.M. DINNER
WILL BE SERVED AT 6:30.
E. BECAUSE OF THE THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY, THE
STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING WILL BE HELD
ON WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 15, AT 5:30 P.M.
FOLLOWED BY THE JOINT BOARDS MEETING AT
7:30 P.M.
AT THIS TIME THERE ARE NO COMMITTEE MEETINGS
SCHEDULED FOR DECEMBER. THE JOINT BOARDS
WILL MEET ON WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 13TH.
MEETING DATE: 10126/96 TEAM 7130 P.M. DISTRICTS: 1.2. 3.S.S.7. 11. 13 8 14
DISTRICT 1 JOINT BOARD6
IMORENOI ........... MC OUIOAN ........ IBOWMANI ........... AGE ............. g` _
(PEMV) ............ FERRYMAN ........ IHA5TIN061........... MOWN ...........
(COONTZI ........... MURPHY .......... ISCOTR ............. COLLINB .......... -
IPOTTSI ............ SALTAREW ........ IDEBAYI ............. COX .............
IBIENEM ....... STANTON ......... ICO%) ............... DEBAY .........
IBELLI ............... DENES ...........
IBAUMI ............. DETTLOFF .........
DISTRICT 2 IPARKM) ............ DUNLAP =
(SCOTT) . . ... . COLLINS ......., IDOWNEVI............ EMENRODE .....
(GULUMSONI ..... .... WE. ........... IPERRYI ............. FERRYMAN ...... _
(SELL) . ......... .... GENES ............ IANDERSOM .......... FLORA .........
IPARKERI .......... . DUNLAP........... pt IMARSHALL) .......... GRIFFIN ...........
JANDER Y I .......... ECUROMR... ......,. MARDI ............. OULLI%80N ........ J� -_
IDOWNEONI ......... ELORA ODE ........ IWAIIDI ............. NAMMOND .......
IMORENO) ........... MCGUIGAN ...... IMUERI ............. LEIMIG ...........
ICOONTZI ........... MURPHY .......... IMINERI ............. LINN . ............ -_
INQRSVI ............ M . ........... IMOREN01 ............ MC OURN ........
IZLAKETI............ MGM ...... ICOONT21 ............ MURMY ..........
ISTEINER) ........... STANTON ......... IOUNLAN ............ PARKS........... -_
IDALVI ............. ZEMEL ............ JQL IEPPERSONI........... RICE ............. �L
INORBYI ............. SA ... ......... _
DISTRICT 3 IPOTTSI ............. BALTAW........
IDOTSONI ........... SAM ........... y (DOTSONI ............ MNEN ...........
IPARI(ERI ........... DUNLAP I.......... 41k RLAKETI............. SINGER ..I........
ISOWMANI .......... AGE ........... STEINER)............. STANTON .........
(HASTINOBI.......... BROWN ........... ISTANTONI ........... STEINS ..........
I6COTT ....
GROWCOLLINS .......... IMILLERI ............. SWAN............ _
IANDERSONI ......... FLORA ............ IWAHL61AOM1 ........ BVLVIA ...........
IMAflSHAIII ......... GRIFFIN ........... IOULLIXSONI .......... WELCH ...........
IMUER) ............ LEIPZIO ........... IDALYI .............. 2EMEL .........
(MINER) ............ LINN ............. me
(MORENO) ........... MCGUIGAN ...... _
(EMERSO .......... RICE ........,.. STAFF OTHERB
NI
INORSYI ............ M ............. ANDERSON . SIG WOODRUFF .,
RLAKET............ SINGER ....... HASENSTAB � ANDRUS . . ..
ISTENERI ........... STANTON .......,, HODGES ... �. DEMN.. . . . .
MAHLSTROMI ....... BVLVIA ......,,,.. HOVEY .... . KNOPF . .. . .
(DALY) ............. 2EMEL ............ . JONK ..... LEE ........
KYLE ... tL UNDSTROM ..
DISTRICTS UNDER .... . NIXON......
(COX) .............. DEBAY............ LUDWIN ... _ MAW......
(STANTON) .......... STEIN DOTS S........... . MCINTYRE.. JL STONE ..... 7
IDEBAYI ............ GOT............. JL OS ...... _ ..........
..........
DISTRICTS SMEO . yG ........
IPERRY FERRYMAN......... . WHEATLEY .. . .......
............
ICO%1 . . ............ DEMY....•....... WILWN ... . . . . .... .
(STANTONI .......... STEWS........... WtNNSSOOR�1.F.,/,'[D_
M DISTRICT
(WARD
ARGI ............ HAMMONO.........
(POTT6) ............ SALTAREW ........ 4L
UPERR . . ............ DEBAY............
IPEflRYI ............ FERRYMAN......... _
IMORENOI ........... MCGUMAN ........ {�
ICOONTZI ........... STERNLY ....
NI
I6TANTO .......... MURPHY
V7`„M_,Lp_O �YAE
DISTRICT 11 /�/�/�,4�
IBAUERI ............ LFIRIO ........... /YN�-�
TI
(STEINS .......... STANTOF ......... -_
DISTRIC . . ......... BTANION .......
DISTRICT 13
IWELDHI .. . ... ...... OULLIIEI%SON _
IOAUVI .... ......... MURM ...........
(DOONRI .. ......... M AIUMR ..........
(DUNLAP) ........... PARKER ........... ,K`
(STANTONI .......... STEINS.
DISTRICT 14
(POTT$) ............ BALTARELLI ......:: / '
ICOONT21 ........... SALTAR ........ /
MARDI ......... HANNON......... ./
(STANTGNI .......... STEINER........... T�(.('(„4 JAWMOMBSWIRER01101-103.
IMIWRI ............ SWAN ............ �/ ��!(�� 09127/95
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County,California
P.O.Box 8127 • 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127
Telephone: (714)962-2411
II DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Wednesday, September 20, 1995-5:30 P.M.
A meeting of the Executive Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, S. 7, 11, 13
and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Wednesday, September 20, 1995, at 5:30 p.m., at
the Districts' Administrative offices.
(1) ROLL CALL
The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT:
Present: Terry Andrus, Counsel
Lisa Carlson, Scientist
John Cox, Jr., Joint Chair
Pat McGuigan, Chair, District 1 and STAFF PRESENT:
OMITS Chair
John J. Collins, Chair, District 2 and Don McIntyre, General Manager
PDC Chair Blake Anderson, Asst. General Manager
George Brown, FAHR Chair Judith A. Wilson, Asst. General Manager
Sal A. Sapien, Chair, District 3 Gary Hasenstab, Director of Personnel
Jan Debay, Chair, District 5 Ed Hodges. Director of Maintenance
James Ferryman, Chair, District 6 Steve Hovey, Director of Information
Barry Hammond, Chair, District 7 Technology
Thomas Saltarelli, Chair, District 14 Bob Ooten, Director of Operations
Roger Stanton, County Supervisor Gary Streed, Director of Finance
William Steiner, County Supervisor Lauri Bluestein, Laboratory Manager
Don R. Griffin, Past Joint Chair Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary
Absent:
John Gullixson, Chair, District 13
Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair
(2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
r�
i
Minutes of the Executive Committee
Page 2 of 7
September 20, 1995
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no comments by any member of the public.
(4) APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of the July 19, 1995, Executive Committee meeting were approved as drafted.
(5) REPORTS OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR, GENERAL MANAGER, AND GENERAL COUNSEL
(a) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
There was no report by the Committee Chair.
(b) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
The General Manager asked Judy Wilson, the Chief Administrative Officer, to report
on the activities towards consolidation of the Districts. There is a meeting with
LAFCO next week; staff is going to propose submitting the required documentation on
our own forms and procedures because the LAFCO staff is down to one person. Stall
is also working on a new District 14 agreement with IRWD, with the goal of approving
that agreement before consolidation.
(c) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
There was no report by Counsel.
(6), (7), (8) and (14) A motion was made, seconded and passed to approve Items 6, 7, 6
and 14, and to concur in the recommended actions as follows:
(6)(a) Consideration of a motion to receive and file draft Minutes of
Meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization Study held
on July 19, 1995.
(6)(b) Consideration of motion to concur in the recommended actions of
the Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization Study held on July 19,
1995, as follows:
Item 6(b) Authorize Staff to proceed with procurement actions
for the modifications to the Administrative Support
area.
Item 6(c) Authorize staff to design the Information Technology
portable office complex in a size large enough to
accommodate the Plant Automation Group.
(7)(a) Consideration of motion to receive and file Minutes of Meeting of
Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization held on July 25, 1995.
—'" Minutes of the Executive Committee
Page 3 of 7
September 20, 1995
(7)(b) Consideration of motion to concur in the recommended actions of
the Ad Hoc Committee Meeting re Space Utilization Study held on
July 25, 1995, as follows:
Item 6(a): Approving the draft Scope of Work for the Space
Utilization Study; authorizing staff to solicit
Statements of Qualifications from a minimum of ten
firms; and authorizing staff to evaluate the
Statements of Qualifications and request proposals
from the selected top five firms-
(8) Consideration of motion to receive and file Minutes of Meeting of
Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization Study held on August 2,
1995.
(14) Consideration of motion to receive and file draft Minutes of Ad Hoc
Committee re Space Utilization Study for the meeting held
September 7, 1995.
(9) and (10) A motion was made, seconded and passed to receive and file revised Minutes of
Meetings of Ad Hoc Committee re Landfill Issues held on August 9, 1995 and
August 16, 1995.
Chair Cox indicated that staff is continuing its due diligence efforts and the Committee
will be meeting next month to revisit the issue. Representatives from cities in south
Orange County will be asked to attend the meeting so that we may receive any
cencems they may have first hand. The General Manager is also continuing
discussions with city leaders to advise them of our efforts. Director McGuigan briefed
the Committee on the some of the recent actions of the Landfill Commission.
(11) A motion was made, seconded and passed to receive and file draft Minutes of Steering
Committee meeting held on August 23, 1995.
(12) OMTS Committee Chair Pat McGuigan announced that, as a result of Ed Hodges' efforts, the
AQMD staff has recommended award to the Districts and their partners$447,000 in AB2677
funds for a compressed natural gas refueling station to be sited on Districts' property. Judy
Wilson also thanked the Directors for their city's support for the Districts' proposal. The project
will be presented to the Committees next month for approval. One point of interest is that the
project should result in revenues to the Districts.
(a) A motion was made, seconded and passed to receive and file draft Minutes of
Operations, Maintenance, and Technical Services Committee meeting held on
September 6, 1995.
(b) A motion was made, seconded and passed to concur in the recommended actions of
the Operations, Maintenance, and Technical Services Committee held on
September 6, 1995, as follows:
Minutes of the Executive Committee
Page 4 of 7
September 20, 1995
Item 6(a): Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a purchase order
to GTE, in a total amount not to exceed $93,446.81, including sales
tax, for the Purchase of Meridian 1 Option 61 Upgrade for PBX at
Plant No. 1, and Purchase of Meridian 1 Option 11 E PBX for Plant
No. 2 (Specification No. E-258).
Item 6(b): Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a purchase order
to GTE for a Telephone Systems Maintenance Agreement for the
Districts' existing telephone PBX and related equipment
(Specification No. P-163), for a three-year period beginning October
1, 1995 to September 30, 1998, for an amount not to exceed
$74,113.80.
OMTS95-039: Consideration of Resolution No. 95-_, approving Plans and
Specifications for Construction of Improvements to Ocean Outfall
Booster Station Control System, Job No. J-31-2.
OMTS95-042: Consideration of motion to award a purchase order for Discovery
System 616, Millennium 2010 Pentium SS High Pressure Liquid
Chromatography (HPLC) system from Waters Corporation
(Specification No. E-260), for the total price of$74,210 plus tax and
shipping.
(13) PDC Chair John Collins advised the Directors that the PDC Committee has decided to take
on the review of all change orders, including those for collection system projects in the
various Districts. It was felt that this would provide a cohesiveness to the review process.
(a) A motion was made, seconded and passed to receive and file draft Minutes of
Planning, Design and Construction Committee as revised for the meeting held on
September 7, 1995.
(b) A motion was made, seconded and passed to concur in the recommended actions of
the Planning, Design and Construction Committee held on September 7, 1995, as
follows: (These items will be presented to the October Board)
PDC95-26: Consideration of the following actions re Purchase of Spark-Ignited
Engines for Use in Central Power Generation Systems, Job No.
J-19A:
(1) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3 to the
Plans and Specifications for said Project, authorizing a net
deduction of$1,564,750.00 to the contract with Cooper
Cameron Corporation, Cooper Energy Services, for one item of
additional work and deletion of one portion of work, decreasing
the total amount of change orders on this contract to
$468,531.82, and increasing the Original Contract Amount of
$18,968,113.00 to$19,486,644.82.
Minutes of the Executive Committee
Page 5 of 7
September 20, 1995
(2) Consideration of Resolution No. 95-—Accepting said
contract as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of
Completion and Approving the Final Closeout Agreement.
PDC95-28: Consideration of motion approving actions re Specific Term
Employment Agreement with Joseph T. Horvath.
OMTS95-039: Consideration of Resolution No. 95-_, approving Plans and
Specifications for Construction of Improvements to Ocean Outfall
Booster Station Control System, Job No. J-31-2, and recommending
that the General Manager be Authorized to establish the date of
receipt of bids (Tentative bid date is October 24, 1995).
(15) (a) A motion was made, seconded and passed to receive and file draft Finance,
Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on
September 13, 1995.
(b) A motion was made, seconded and passed to concur in the recommended actions of
the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee held on
September 13, 1995, as follows:
Item 6: Recommend approval of an interest rate for deferred excess
capacity charge agreements equal to the rate charged on the
date of the agreement on U.S. Treasury Bills or Notes with a
term most close to the term of agreement plus 100 basis points.
FAHR95-36: Recommend approval of extension of Real Property Lease,
Plant No. 1, Lease No. L-009-1, with Lessee, First Bank of
California, for a tens of three years at the greater of$60,000
per year or 10% of gross.
(16) Discussion of the following information items:
(a) Status report on CSD—IRWD Capacity Agreement.
Staff has been working with IRWD staff to change the Agreement for Purchase and
Sale of Capacity Rights in Treatment, Disposal and Sewer Facilities between County
Sanitation District No. 14 and the other County Sanitation Districts of Orange County.
The IRWD funds all of the District 14 financial requirements. The original agreement
was signed in 1986, and many of the assumptions made at that time have changed
dramatically and are no longer valid, resulting in inequities and differences. The time
has now come to adjust the agreement based on actual flow. The resulting
agreement provides that District 14's annual flow will be calculated by multiplying the
actual flow for the four highest months by three to determine a twelve-month flow,
beginning with 1995-96; that proceeds from the incremental sale of District 14's share
of joint works capital facilities will remain in the District 14 treasury and will be used
Minutes of the Executive Committee
Page 6 of 7 q
September 20, 1995
first to satisfy reserve policy requirements, with any excess used to fund future
construction needs; and finally, interest earnings on reserve funds will be allocated to
District 14.
Staff will continue with their efforts to finalize the agreement, and attempt to verity any
other issues that could impact the consolidation effort. Director Saltarelli suggested
that the Districts consider buying out IRWD and paying off the bondholders.
The issue of a potential conflict of interest by Director Swan was discussed, and it
was suggested that this be considered when the Boards act on the agreement.
(b) Orange County Bankruptcy Update
(1) The Committee recommended receiving and filing the attached Staff
Report dated September 25, 1995 on Resolution of Bankruptcy Claims.
Blake Anderson presented an update on the bankruptcy as of the meeting this
morning with the OCIP. The deal has been struck, but there are several things
that still need to be considered, changed, reconciled and finalized. These are
contained in the attached presentation package.
(2) A motion was made, seconded and passed recommending endorsement of
the cooperative agreement in concept, and to wait until the final r"1
agreement and disclosure information has been completed and reviewed
by the Boards prior to making a final determination.
(17) CLOSED SESSION
There was no need for a Closed Session.
(18) OTHER BUSINESS
Judy Wilson noted that at the last FAHR Committee meeting it was reported that we had
received $297 million from out investments that survived the bankruptcy losses and were still
owed $400,000 in interest payments from the Pool. On Friday, that money was received by
the Districts.
Director Sapien asked for the current status of the Techite pipe case. Counsel indicated that
the an appeal has been filed by United Technologies Corporation. He will be reporting on
this issue in Closed Session next week and will recommend that a cross appeal be filed.
Director Sapien asked that he be kept advised on this case.
The General Manager again invited the Directors and their families to the Districts' Family
Day September 23. This is the first time a Family Day has been held since 1973. We
expect about 600, including 125 children. r"�
Minutes of the Executive Committee
Page 7 of 7
September 20, 1995
(19) MATTERS TO BE REPORTED ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING
There were no matters to be reported on at a subsequent meeting.
(20) MATTERS ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT.
There were no matters for a future agenda.
(21) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS
The next meeting of the Executive Committee is schedule for Wednesday, October 18, 1995
at 5:30 p.m.
Chair Cox indicated that because of the many items requiring Committee review and
approval, there will be meetings held in November after all. The OMTS Committee will meet
on November 1; the PDC Committee on November 2; and the FAHR Committee on
November 8. The Executive Committee meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, November 8,
1995, at 7 p.m., following the FAHR Committee. The Joint Board meeting is scheduled for
November 15 at 7:30 p.m.
(22) ADJOURNMENT
The Executive Committee adjourned at approximately 7:10 p.m.
Submitted by:
n Tappan, Se ary
1 OPGMIIXECLSff9S'IDS%6.MIN
A
l
COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 , 13 AND 14
OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
MINUTES
JOINT BOARD MEETING
OCTOBER 25, 1995
S\oa�\giRICTS 0Fo9q�
yQ2 � n0
� G
z �
� a
�olFOl/,y�E
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018
ROLL CALL
A regular meepno of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
7. 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, CalHamia, was held on October 25, 1995, at 7:30 p.m., in the
Districts Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocepon the roll was tilled
> and the Secretary nmoned a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2,3, S. 6, 7. 11, 13 and 14 as
follows:
ACTNE ALTERNATE
DIRECTORS DIRECTORS
DISTRICT NO. 1: Pat McGuigan, Chair To R. Moreno
James M. Ferryman,Chair pro tem AMw Perry
Mark A. Murphy Joanne Comm,
Themes R.Urinal Jr.Pons
Roger Stanton William G.Banner
DISTRICT NO.2: g Jam Collins. Chair George Scent
x Daniel T.Welch, Chair pro tam John M.Gulli ison
Barry Denes Bob Bell
1 Burma Dunlop Glenn Parker
a Norman Z.Eckemode Carol Downey
James H. Flora Stave Anderson
Pat McGuigan Ted R.More.
Mark A.Murphy Joanne Coo.
Julie Sa Cmis Nancy
1 Sheldon Singer George L.Matter
• Roger Stanton William G. Steiner
•_ Bob Zonal Tom Daly
DISTRICT NO. 3: x Sal A. Sepien, Chan Harry M.Dotson
B.me Dunlap, Chain pro lem Glenn Parker
• Cecilia Age Welmr Bowman
• George Brown Marilyn Bruce Hastings
_a_ Jam Colllm George Soon
James H.Flora Steve Anderson
Don R.Griffin Patsy Marshall
Victor Leipaip Ralph Bauer
Wally Linn Eva G. Miner
Pat McGuigan Ted R. Moreno
Margie L.Nice Grace Epperson
Julie So Chrrs Noray
Sheldon Singer George L.Zlakel
3_ Roger Stanton Wlliam G.Steimr
Charles Sylvia Robert Wahlshom
Bob Zemel Tom Daly
DISTRICT NO. 5: �_ Jan Deny. Clair John C.Cos,Jr.
Wiliam G.Steiner, Chair pm tam Roper Stamen
g John C. Co.,Jr. Jan Deny
DISTRICT NO.6: �� James M.Ferryman.Chair Anhe Perry
• Jan Deny.Chair no ter John C.Co.,Jr.
1 Willem G. Shemer Roger Storage
DISTRICT 11 7: 1 Barry Hammond, Chair Mike Were
1 Thomas R. Sanrelli,Chair pm tam Jr.Pons
1 Jan Deny John C.cos, Jr.
James M.Ferryman Arthur Perry
Pal McGuigan Ted R.Moreno
Mark A.Murphy Joanne Cogan
g Wlliam G.Steiner Roper Stamen
DISTRICT NO. 11: Victor Leiosng,Clair Ralph Bauer
_v Shirley Dettloff, Chair pro tem Ralph Bauer
g Roper Stanton Wiliam G.Steiner
DISTRICT NO. 13: Jam M.Gullisson, Chair Daniel T.Welch
y Bob Zemel,Chair pro tam Tom Daly
y_ Mark A.Murphy _ Joanne Cooma
$ Glenn Parker Burnie Dune,
y Wiliam G.Steiner Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO. 14: y Thomas R.Sarstatt"Chair Jun Pons
t_ Mark A.Murphy. Cher pro tam Joanne Coantr
Barry HammoM Mike Want
z William G. Steiner Roger Stange
y Peen A. Swan Denryl Miller
.2.
D
10/25/95 �
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Don McIntyre, General Manager, Blake P. Anderson,
Assistant General Manager-Operations, Judith A.
Wilson, Assistant General Manager-Administration,
Penny Kyle, Board Secretary, Corinne Berenson, Don
Crapnell, Mark Esquer, John Finias, Gary Hasenstab,
Irwin Haydock, Mike Herrera, Ed Hodges, Patricia
Jonk, Terri Josway, Steve Kozak, John Linder,
Charles McGee, Gary Streed, Mahin Talebi, Dan
Tunnicliff, Paula Zeller
OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Terry Andrus,
Assistant General Counsel, Chip Clements, Michael
Jarman, Jon Schotz, Phil Stone
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the Joint Chair
The Joint Chair reported that the CASA Fall Technical Meeting is scheduled for
November 16th and 17th at the Hyatt Regency in Irvine, and encouraged
Directors' attendance.
The following tentatively scheduled upcoming meetings were then announced,
as follows:
Operations, Maintenance, and Technical Services Committee -
Wednesday, November 1, at 5:30 p.m.
Planning, Design, and Construction Committee- Thursday, November 2,
at 5:00 p.m. at Plant No. 2.
Finance, Administrative, and Human Resources Committee -
Wednesday, November 8, at 5:30 p.m.
Executive Committee -Wednesday, November 8, at 7:00 p.m.
Steering Committee -Wednesday, November 15, at 5:30 p.m.
-3-
10/25195
DISTRICT 1
Aooroval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular
meeting held September 27, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be
deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 2
Aooroval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular
meeting held September 27, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be
deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 3
Approval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular
meeting held September 27, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be
deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 5
Approval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular
meeting held September 27, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be
deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 6
Approval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular
meeting held September 27, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be
deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 7
Approval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular
meeting held September 27, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be
deemed approved, as mailed.
4-
10/25/95
DISTRICT 11
Approval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular
meeting held September 27, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be
deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 13
Approval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular
meeting held September 27, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be
deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 14
AAporoval of Minutes
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular
meeting held September 27, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be
deemed approved, as mailed.
ALL DISTRICTS
Ratification of payment of Joint and
Individual District Claims
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That payment of Joint and Individual District claims set forth on exhibits "A" and
"B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below,
be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so
indicated.
-5-
10/25/95
10/04/95 &
09/20/95 10/06/95
ALL DISTRICTS
Joint Operating Fund - $620,187.44 $798,567.03
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 560,310.76 461,765.16
Joint Working Capital Fund - 115,727.22 135,017.29
Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 52,888.38 25,857.34
DISTRICT NO. 1 - 6,317.55 225.00
DISTRICT NO, 2 - 14,322.53 42,506.41
DISTRICT NO. 3 - 234,237.02 81,253.70
DISTRICT NO. 5 - 18,211.07 11,618.76
DISTRICT NO. 6 - 1,232.01 0.00
DISTRICT NO. 7 7,325.96 62,003.57
DISTRICT NO. 11 336,183.65 15,861.88
DISTRICT NO, 13 47.18 0.00
DISTRICT NO. 14 1,952.52 48,450.83
DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 121,382.77 4,095.96
DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 0.00 2,930.72
DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 0.00 5,643.39
$2,090,326.06 $1.695.797.04
ALL DISTRICTS
Actions re Purchase of Three Cab and Chassis
with Crane Mounted Service Body. Soecification
No. V-008
Receive and file letter from Maurice
J. Soop Truck Center
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the letter dated September 28, 1995, from Maurice J. Sopp Truck
Center, apparent low bidder, requesting that they be allowed to withdraw
their bid for Purchase of Three Cab and Chassis with Crane Mounted
Service Body, Specification No. V-008, due to a mathematical error, be,
and is hereby, received, ordered filed, and approved.
-6-
10/25/95
Awarding Purchase of Specification No. V-008.
to Mike McCarthy Buick & GMC Truck
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the bid tabulation and recommendation for award of Purchase of
Three Cab and Chassis with Crane Mounted Service Body, Specification
No. V-008, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase order be, and is hereby,
awarded to Mike McCarthy Buick& GMC Truck, for a total amount not to
exceed $124,346.37, plus sales tax.
ALL DISTRICTS
Approving Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement
with Falcon Disposal Services, Inc.
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement with Falcon Disposal Services, Inc.,
for transportation of residual solids for disposal within a 40-mile radius,
extending the agreement for a six-month period beginning October 30, 1995, at
the existing contract unit price of$260.00 per load for grit and screening, and
$12.08 per ton for sludge, be, and is hereby, approved; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized
to execute said Amendment in form approved by General Counsel.
ALL DISTRICTS
Approving Amendment No. 4 to the Agreement
with BKK Corporation
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That Amendment No. 4 to the Agreement with BKK Corporation for interim
residual solids disposal, extending the agreement for a six-month period
beginning October 30, 1995, at the existing contract unit price of$31.38 per ton
for grit, screenings, and sludge, be, and is hereby, approved; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized
to execute said Amendment in form approved by General Counsel.
-7-
10/25/95
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive and file draft minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee
re Space Utilization Study
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the draft minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization Study
meetings held on July 14, 1995, and September 13, 1995, be, and are hereby,
received and ordered filed.
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive and file draft minutes of the Steering Committee
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the draft minutes of the Steering Committee meeting held on
September 27, 1995, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed.
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive and file draft minutes of the Operations.
Maintenance and Technical Services Committee
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the draft minutes of the Operations, Maintenance, and Technical Services
Committee meeting held on October 4, 1995, be, and are hereby, received and
ordered filed.
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive and file draft minutes of the Plannino.
Design, and Construction Committee
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the draft minutes of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee
meeting held on October 5, 1995, be, and are hereby, received and ordered
filed.
-8-
10/25/95
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive and file draft minutes of the Finance. Administration.
and Human Resources Committee
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the draft minutes of the Finance, Administration, and Human Resources
Committee meeting held on October 11, 1995, be, and are hereby, received
and ordered filed.
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive and file draft minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee
re Landfill Acquisition
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the draft minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re Landfill Acquisition meeting
held on October 18, 1995, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed.
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive and file draft minutes of the Executive Committee
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the draft minutes of the Executive Committee meeting held on October 18,
1995, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed.
ALL DISTRICTS (OMTS95-043)
Approving Professional Services Agreement
with Communications Performance Group. Inc.
for design of an Integrated Emergency
Response Plan (Specification No. P-166)
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Operations, Maintenance, and Technical Services Committee
certification of the final negotiated fee relative to the Professional Services
Agreement with Communications Performance Group, Inc. for design of an
Integrated Emergency Response Plan (Specification No. P-166), be, and is
hereby, received, ordered filed, and approved; and,
-9-
10/25/95
FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution
No. 95-104, approving said agreement with Communications Performance
Group, Inc. for said services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor, including
overhead, plus fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $125,000.00 for the
1995-96 fiscal year, and a total cost not to exceed $312,232.00. Said
resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS (OMTS95-045)
Authorizing an increase in Districts' expenditure
for in-house laboratory analyses supporting the
Joint Ultraviolet Pilot Proiect with Orange
County Water Districts
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to increase Districts' expenditures for
in-house laboratory analyses supporting the Joint Ultraviolet Pilot Project with
Orange County Water District, increasing the Districts' cost for direct labor and
material for an additional amount of$17,000.00, increasing the total authorized
amount from $40,000.00 to an amount not to exceed $57,000.00.
ALL DISTRICTS (PDC95-,311
Aoorovino. in concept. the Partnerino Charter
and the Value Engineering Clause to the contract
with Margate Construction. Inc.. for Job No. P1-36-2
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Partnering Charter and the Value Engineering Clause to the contract
with Margate Construction, Inc. for Secondary Treatment Improvements at
Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36-2, be, and is hereby, approved in concept.
ALL DISTRICTS (OMTS95-041)
Approve. in concept construction of
Compressed Natural Gas Refueling Station.
Job No. P1-51
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the construction of a Compressed Natural Gas Refueling Station, Job
No. P1-51, be, and is hereby, approved in concept: and,
-10-
10/25/95
FURTHER MOVED: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to loan reserve
funds in the 1995-96 budget to build the station; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That staff be, and is hereby, directed to establish an
enterprise report for future review.
ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR95-25)
Adopting Resolution No. 95-105, Repealing
Resolution No. 95-54, Pertaining to Classification.
Compensation and Other Terms Conditions.
Rules. and Regulations of Employment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 95-105, repealing
Resolution No. 95-54 Pertaining to Classification, Compensation, and Other
Terms, Conditions, Rules and Regulations of Employment, reflecting changes
occurring in legislation and labor law, and required insurance coverages. Said
resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR95-38)
Authorizing staff to solicit bids for a Professional
Services Agreement re Financial Information
System Proiecl (Specification No P-167)
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to solicit bids for a Professional
Services Agreement for the Financial Information System Project, for
completion of Phase lll, Selection Process for Hardware and Software; and,
Phase IV, Implementation and Acceptance of the Selected Hardware and
Software Solutions (Specification No. P-167).
-11-
10/25/95
ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR9540)
Authorizina staff to negotiate Amendment
No. 2 to the Aareement between County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 1.2.3.5,6.7.11 & 13
and County Sanitation District No. 14 re
Purchase and Sale of Capacity Rights in
Treatment. Disoosal. and Sewer Facilities
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to negotiate Amendment No. 2 to the
Agreement between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 & 13
and County Sanitation District No. 14 for Purchase and Sale of Capacity Rights
in Treatment, Disposal and Sewer Facilities, providing for District No. 14's
annual flow to be based upon actual average flow per day for the four highest
months, and providing capacity for higher winter month flows.
ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR9541)
Receive and file monthly reports of Pacific
Investment Management Company
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the monthly investment report and staff report regarding performance
monitoring of Pacific Investment Management Company be, and are hereby,
received and ordered filed.
ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR9542)
Actions re Establishing Policy for
Microcomputer Acquisitions
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the policy that all PC technology purchases be limited to the most recent
list of Tier 1 and Tier 2 vendors as defined by The Gartner Group, for both
desktop computers and mobile computers, be, and is hereby, declared; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That a policy that all purchasing actions relating to the
purchase of PC technology utilize the California Multiple Award Schedule
(CMAS) contracts for the purchase of PC technology from among the Tier 1
and Tier 2 vendors as defined by Gartner Group; and authorizing staff to
compare CMAS pricing to choose the lowest priced Tier 1 and Tier 2 vendor's
configuration applicable to the Districts' needs, be, and is hereby, declared.
-12-
10/25/95
Authorizino staff to issue a purchase order
to Dell Computer (Specification No. E-2611
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue a purchase order to Dell
Computer for the Purchase of 60 Personal Computers and Monitors and
Other Associated Components (Specification No. E-261) for a total
amount not to exceed $208,900.00, plus sales tax.
Director Mark A. Murphy requested that his abstention from voting on
this item be made a matter of record.
ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR95-43)
Establishing a Relief Operator bonus
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 95-106, authorizing
the establishment of a Relief Operator bonus of$0.60 per hour for employees
covered by the Operations and Maintenance Memorandum of Understanding.
Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS
Request for review and recommendations
regarding implementation of time clocks for
Districts' staff
Director Gullixson expressed concern regarding time management of Districts'
staff and the possibility of implementing time clocks. It was then moved that a
study be completed by the Finance, Administration and Human Resources
Committee on the issue of time clock implementation. The motion failed to
pass.
ALL DISTRICTS
Status of the Strategic Plan
The Assistant General Manager of Operations gave a brief report and, using
slides, illustrated the timeline for the strategic plan.
-13-
10/25f9e
ALL DISTRICTS
Actions relative to the proposed acquisition
of County of Orange Integrated Waste
Management System
Verbal Report by Assistant General Manager
of Operations
The Assistant General Manager of Operations gave a brief report and
update on the feasibility of acquiring the County of Orange Integrated
Waste Management System.
Authorizing staff and consultants to
conduct expanded Phase 1 Assessment
Studies
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to conduct expanded Phase
Assessment Studies on moderate and high exposure landfill sites, to be
done within the previously authorized amount of$100,000.00.
Authorizing consulting services for
Phase II Assessment Study
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That consulting services for Phase II Assessment Study to determine
landfill assets and liabilities for an amount not to exceed $100,000.00,
be, and are hereby, authorized.
Authorizing staff to issue letter of
interest to enter into negotiations for
purchase of the County of Orange
Integrated Waste Management System
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue a letter of interest to
enter into negotiations to develop an agreement between the County of
Orange and the Districts for the purchase and sale of the County of
Orange Integrated Waste Management System; and,
-14-
10/25/95
That an amount not to exceed $100,000.00 in nonrefundable payments,
be, and is hereby, authorized to be applied toward the purchase price;
that said contract provide that the County will enter into negotiations with
the County Sanitation Districts and will not enter into contract
negotiations with any other entity, either public or private, for a period of
nine (9) months. The County shall also provide to the Sanitation
Districts any and all unsolicited offers, proposals, or solicitations of offers
made to the County. Said contract to further provide that the
$100,000.00 shall be refunded to the extent of 50% provided a final
agreement for the purchase and sale of the facilities is made and
entered into between the parties.
Director Victor Leipzig requested that his opposition to this item be made
a matter of record. Director Pat McGuigan requested that her abstention
from voting on this item be made a matter of record.
ALL DISTRICTS
Status report re County's Commingled Investment Pool
Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager of Operations, and Tom Woodruff,
General Counsel, gave a brief report on the status of the Orange County
Commingled Investment Pool and the County of Orange bankruptcy.
ALL DISTRICTS
General Counsel's comments Prior to Closed Session
General Counsel reported to the Directors the need for a closed session as
authorized by Government Code Section 54956.9 to discuss and consider the
item specified as Item 16(b)(4) on the published Agenda. General Counsel
also indicated a need to add one item needing immediate action that arose
subsequent to the publication of the agenda. He reported that additional items
could be added pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2(b) upon a two-
thirds vote of the Directors. No other items would be discussed or acted upon.
ALL DISTRICTS
Add Item to the Closed Session Agenda
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That Item 16(b)(5) to confer with General Counsel re County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California, vs. E. L. Yeager Construction Company, at al,
Orange County Superior Court Case No. 732578, be added to the Agenda.
-15-
10/25/95
ALL DISTRICTS
Convene in Closed Session Pursuant to
Government Code Section 54956.9
The Boards convened in closed session at 9:02 p.m. pursuant to Government
Code Section 54956.9. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the
Boards of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California
Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary
in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed
Meetings. No action was taken re Agenda Item Nos. 16(b)(1), (2), and (3).
ALL DISTRICTS
Reconvene in regular session
At 9:14 p.m., the Boards reconvened in regular session.
ALL DISTRICTS
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,
California. vs. E. L. Yeager Construction Company,
at al.. Orange County Suoerior Court Case
No. 732578
General Counsel reported that during closed session, the Boards Directors
acted to authorize General Counsel to accept a settlement proposal of
Defendant E. L. Yeager Construction Company prior to or at time of trial, if in
accordance with the terms and conditions established by the Boards.
ALL DISTRICTS
Actions re Supplemental Agenda Item relative to
Summons and Complaint for Inverse Condemnation,
Edward T. Reid vs. County Sanitation Districts of
Orange County, Orange County Superior Court
Case No. 752065
Authorizing consideration of Supplemental
Agenda Item relative to Summons and
Complaint for Inverse Condemnation,
Edward T. Reid vs. County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County. Orange County Superior
Court Case No. 752065
-16-
10/25/95
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby authorize consideration of a
supplemental agenda item relative to Summons and Complaint for
Inverse Condemnation, Edward T. Reid vs. County Sanitation Districts of
Orange County, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 752065, which
was not posted 72 hours prior to the Board meeting date because the
request to take said action arose subsequent to the agenda being
posted.
Receive and file Summons and Complaint
for Inverse Condemnation. Edward T. Reid
vs. County Sanitation Districts of Orange
County. Orange County Superior Court
Case No. 752065
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Summons and Complaint for Inverse Condemnation, Edward T.
Reid vs. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Orange County
Superior Court Case No. 752065, in connection with the Santa Ana
River widening project with the County of Orange, be, and is hereby,
received and ordered filed; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Districts' General Counsel be, and is
hereby, authorized to appear and defend the interests of the Districts.
DISTRICT 1
Approving Settlement Agreement with
Alphanetics. Inc. and Francisco Lopez
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Settlement Agreement with Alphanetics, Inc. and Francisco Lopez, for
administrative penalties in the amount of$42,000.00 for wastewater discharge
violations, be, and is hereby, approved, in a form approved by General
Counsel.
-17-
10/25/95
DISTRICT 1
Journment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1
be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:14 p.m.
DISTRICT 2
Actions re Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue
Trunk Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-R1
Approvino Change Order No. 3
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications for said project,
authorizing an addition of $7,398.80 to the contract with Colich Bros.,
Inc. dba Colich & Sons, for one item of additional work, and granting a
time extension of 30 calendar days for completion of said additional
work, be, and is hereby, approved.
AApprovina Chance Order No. 4
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That Change Order No. 4 to the plans and specifications for said project,
authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a net deduction of
$109,637.60 from the contract with Colich Bros., Inc. dba Colich & Sons,
be, and is hereby, approved.
Acceptinc Contract No. 2-9-R1 as complete
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 95-107-2,
accepting Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Trunk Subtrunk Sewer,
Contract No. 2-9-R1, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of
Completion, and approving Final Closeout Agreement for a final total
contract amount of$2,657,809.81. Said resolution, by reference hereto,
is hereby made a part of these minutes.
-18-
10/25/95
DISTRICT 2
Adiournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2
be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:14 p.m.
DISTRICT 3
Adioumment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3
be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:14 p.m.
DISTRICT 5
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5
be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:14 p.m.
DISTRICTS 6. 7 & 14
Actions re Baker-Gisler Interceptor. from
Fairview Road to Plant No. 1. Contract No. 14-1-1A
Approving Change Order No. 3
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications for said
project, authorizing an addition of$39,734.90 to the contract with
Mladen Buntich Construction Co., Inc., for five items of additional work,
and granting a time extension of 33 calendar days for completion of
said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved.
-19-
10/25/95
Approving Chance Order No. 4
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That Change Order No. 4 to the plans and specifications for said
project, authorizing an addition of$209,090.78 to the contract with
Mladen Buntich Construction Co., Inc., for nine items of additional work,
and granting a time extension of 39 calendar days for completion of
said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved.
Approvinc Chance Order No. 5
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That Change Order No. 5 to the plans and specifications for said
project, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a net
addition of$36,059.00 to the contract with Mladen Buntich Construction
Co., Inc., be, and is hereby, approved.
Accepting Contract No. 14-1-1A as complete
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 95-108,
accepting Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1,
Contract No. 14-1-1A, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of
Completion, and approving Final Closeout Agreement for a final total
contract amount of$8,810,715.81. Said resolution, by reference
hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 6
Journment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6
be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:14 p.m.
-20-
10/25/95
DISTRICT 7
Loyd Nitzen v. County Sanitation Districts,
OCSC Case No. 712847
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That Special Legal Counsel be, and is hereby, authorized to accept Plaintiffs
settlement proposal.
DISTRICT 7
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7
be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:14 p.m.
DISTRICT 11
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11
be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:14 p.m.
DISTRICT 13
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13
be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:14 p.m.
-21-
10/25/95
DISTRICT 14
Adjournment
Moved, seconded, and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14
be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:14 p.m.
4aw3rlee --
Secretary of B s of Directors
of County Sa ' a o Districts
Nos, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, , 11, 13 and 14
_22_
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9114/95 PAGE 1 '
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 0920195 POSTING DATE 0920/95
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
147022 ACGIH,INC. $312.14 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
147023 AGTECHCOMPANY $55.729.65 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91
147024 ATM AA,INC. 54.485.00 LAB SERVICES
147025 AT&T-BUSINESS LONG DISTANCE SERVICE $5.00 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
147025 A-Z LOGIC SYSTEMS $233.64 MACHINE REPAIRS
147027 ACCOUNTANTS OVERLOAD $220.50 TEMPORARY PERSONNEL SERVICES
147028 ACTION DOOR REPAIR CORP. $340.76 DOOR REPAIRS
147029 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS,INC. &445,687.81 CONSTRUCTION PI-384
147030 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS,INC. $4.800.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
147031 AIR COLD SUPPLY,INC. $164.74 AIR CONDITIONER REPAIRS
147032 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $18.037.20 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.0.6.9A9
147033 ALLIED ELECTRONICS S7D6.54 INSTRUMENT PARTS
147034 AMERICAN PROTECTIVE SER.,INC. $1.252.34 CONTRACT SECURITY SERVICES
147035 AMERICAN SIGMA $1,119.52 LAB SUPPLIES
147036 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION $12.461.82 SEWER REPAIRS
147037 ANALYSTS,INC. $1,657.49 MECHANICAL PARTS
147038 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL E330.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
147039 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $2,626A2 NOTICES&ADS
m 147040 APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS,INC. $1,376.35 LAB SUPPLIES
X 147041 ABC LABORATORIES $3,830.00 LAB SERVICES
i=. 147D42 AQUATIC BIOSYSTEMS,INC. $235.00 LAB SERVICES
t7J 147043 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT $1.268.50 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
--4 147044 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. $60.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL
D 147045 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $3.924.60 PAYROLL SERVICES
1 147D46 AWARDS&TROPHIES $162.79 PLAQUES
147047 BKK LANDFILL $2.509.03 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10.9.91
147048 BANANA BLUEPRINT $4.223.40 PRINTING M.0.11.07-94
147049 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $1,929.29 BATTERIES
147050 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $4,27&31 LAB SUPPLIES
147051 BENZ ENGINEERING,INC. $270.95 COMPRESSOR PARTS
7470S2 WT BILLARD,INC. $249.60 BUILDING REPAIRS
147053 810-GRO DIVISION $45,595.77 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.4-2695
147054 BOOT BARN $113.03 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES
147055 THE BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFFAIRS $1.411.53 HUMAN RESOURCES PUBLICATION
147056 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. $289.21 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
147057 C.L.TECHNOLOGY 6720.00 GAS ANALYSIS SERVICES
147058 CS COMPANY $2.455.08 HARDWAREIPLUMBING SUPPLIES
147059 CALTEX PLASTICS,INC- $1.071.00 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
147060 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $1,755.86 OFFICE FURNITURE
147061 CENTURY SAFETY INST.&SUPPLY $8,186.93 SAFETY SUPPLIES
147DS2 CHEMICAL ENGINEERING $50.00 SUBSCRIPTION
147DS3 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $87.28 SERVICE AGREEMENT
147DS4 COLE-PALMER INSTRUMENT CO. &B21.87 LABSUPPUES
147065 COUCH&SONS $323.189.50 CONSTRUCTION 11-17-1
147066 COMPUSERVE $246.28 COMPUTER SERVICES
147067 CONSOU13ATED ELECTRICAL DIST $939.04 ELECTRIC PARTS
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9114195 PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 09/20/95 POSTING DATE 0920195
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
147068 CONSUMER PIPE $918.59 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
147069 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC. $338.76 TOOLS
147070 COOPER CAMERON CORP. _ $1,249.28 ENGINE PARTS
147071 COUNTY CLERK $342.00 CEQA FEES
147072 COUNTY CLERK $38.00 CEQA FEES
147073 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 42,510.12 ELECTRIC PARTS
147074 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $4,064.00 STATE UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE
147075 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $200.00 ANNEXATION FEE
147076 DAILY PILOT $144.00 NOTICES&ADS
147077 HSK/DECKER $404.91 INSTRUMENT PARTS
147078 DE GUELLE&SONS GLASS CO. $462.01 GLASS
147079 DELL COMPUTER CORP. $10.556.06 COMPUTER HARDWARE
147080 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIF. $47,435.78 DENTAL INSURANCE PLAN M.O.1-12-94
147081 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $2,050.00 COMPUTER TRAINING
147082 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $940.00 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE
147083 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $1.781.00 PAINT SUPPLIES
147084 DYCAM,INC. $1,505.40 COMPUTER PARTS
147085 ESP NORTH $2,070.52 SECURITY SUPPLIES
m 1470BS EASTMAN,INC. $991,63 OFFICE SUPPLIES
x 1470B7 EMPIRE SCALES CO. $32.65 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
147066 ENCHANTER,INC. $3,500.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5-24-95
147089 ENVIROGEN,INC. $5.029.00 BIOTRICKLING FILTER PROJECT
147090 FMC CORPORATION $102,204.91 HYDROGEN PEROXIDE M.O.9-14-94
147091 PST SAND AND GRAVEL,INC. $532.49 ROAD BASE MATERIALS
n 147092 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $6,322.50 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O. 10-9-91
N 147093 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $501.00 AIR FREIGHT
147094 FISCHER&PORTER CO. $1,751.27 STRIP CHART PAPER
147095 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $2,317.40 LAB SUPPLIES
147096 FISIONS INSTRUMENTS $879.44 LAB SUPPLIES
147097 FLICKINGER CO. $1,637.96 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
147098 FLOSYSTEMS.INC. $8.964.88 PUMP PARTS
147D99 FOSS MARITIME CO. $88.20 FREIGHT CHARGES
147100 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $154.87 PHOTO SUPPLIES
147101 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $321.23 PAINT SUPPLIES
147102 FOUR WHEEL PARTS WHOLESALER $339.73 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
147103 THE FOXBORO CO. $1,737.03 INSTRUMENT PARTS
147104 FRANCE COMPRESSOR PRODUCT $727.87 COMPRESSOR PARTS
147105 FRAZEE PAINT&WALCOVERING $189AO PAINT SUPPLIES
14T706 FRY'S ELECTRONICS $95.81 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
147107 CST,INC. $2.078.72 OFFICE SUPPLIES
147108 GTE TELEPHONE OPERATIONS $12.053.00 RELOCATE TELEPHONE SYSTEM AT PLANT
1471D9 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $116.37 CHEMICALS
147110 GENERAL ALUMINUM FORGINGS $117.39 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
147111 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $3,898.80 ELECTRIC PARTS
147112 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $248.45 TELEPHONE SERVICES
147113 GENICOM CORPORATION $839.00 PRINTING SUPPLIES
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/14195 PAGE 3 '
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 09I20/95 POSTING DATE 09/20/95
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
147114 GIERLICH-MITCHELL,INC. $1.053.79 PUMP PARTS
147115 N.GLANTZ 8 SON,INC. $570.07 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
147116 GOLDEN BELL PRODUCTS $301.70 CLEANER
147117 GRAPHIC CONTROLS $235.46 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
147118 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $229.38 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
147119 GRASSY S.T.I. $2,497.85 ENGINE PARTS
147120 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $1.678.99 PRINTING
147121 DGA CONSULTANTS 611,343A9 ENGINEERING SERVICES 3.35R
147122 DAVID R.GRIFFIN $176,033.02 LEGAL SERVICES-TECHNE PIPE M.O.9-14-94
147123 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $1,037.64 TRUCK PARTS
147124 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $487.74 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
147125 PL HAWN CO,INC. $6.403.58 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
147126 HELPMATES PERSONNEL SERVICES $1.151.20 TEMPORARY PERSONNEL SERVICES
147127 HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT $2.083.33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN.
147128 HEWLETT PACKARD CO. $3,496.50 SERVICE AGREEMENT
147129 HILTI,INC. $639.05 FITTINGS
147130 RC HOFFMAN AND/OR ISCO $100.17 MACHINE REPAIRS
147131 HOME DEPOT $233.85 HARDWARE
TT1 147132 IRS HUGHES CO,INC. $790.70 SIGNS
X 147133 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $1,178.25 WATER USE
147134 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $22,036.13 PERMIT FEES
147135 HYCLONE LABORATORIES $733.63 LAB SUPPLIES
y 147136 IPCO SAFETY $6,200.98 SAFETY SUPPLIES
n 147137 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $98,610.35 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11-18-92
I 147138 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $807.90 CONNECTORS
W 147139 INTUITIVE TECHNOLOGY $16,195.00 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
147140 J2 PRINTING SERVICES $604.48 PRINTING
147141 JIT COMPUTER SOURCE,INC. $3,025.62 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
147142 JAMISON ENGINEERING,INC. $1,362.34 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
147143 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY. $357.06 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
147144 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO. $1,001.20 GAUGE
147145 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $154.18 ELECTRIC PARTS
147146 JONES CHEMICALS,INC. $16.261.35 CHEMICALS
147147 KALLEEN'S COMPUTER PRODUCTS $175.01 COMPUTER SUPPLIES
147148 KING BEARING,INC. $304.88 MACHINE SUPPLIES
147149 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $161.48 HARDWARE
147150 L A CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $383.27 SERVICE AGREEMENTS
147151 LAW/CRANDAL.INC. 51,675.00 SOIL TESTING 7-13-94
147152 LIMITORQUE CORP. $819.66 ELECTRIC REPAIRS
147153 THE LITIGATION GROUP $6,609.56 POST-TRIAL INTERVIEW•TECHI'TE PIPE
147154 LOCALAGENCY E5D0.00 ANNEXATION FEES
147155 MPS $26.83 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
147158 MACOMCO $464.10 SERVICE AGREEMENT
147157 MANDtC MOTORS $149.00 TOWING SERVICES
147158 MANHOLE ADJUSTING $7.900.00 MANHOLE ADJUSTING SERVICES
147159 MANLEY'S BOILER REPAIR CO,INC. $978.75 BOILER REPAIRS
FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 9114195 PAGE4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 09/20/95 POSTING DATE 09/20/95
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
147160 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $0.23 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
147161 MASONEILAN N.AMER,OPERATIONS $3.553.60 INSTRUMENT PARTS
147162 MCMAHAN DESK,INC. $1,139.46 OFFICE FURNITURE
147163 MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. $1,407.44 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
147164 MICRO MOTION E5,188.36 INSTRUMENT PARTS
147165 MICROBIAL INSIGHTS,INC. E150.00 CONSULTING SERVICES M.O.11.18-92
147168 MICROBICS CORPORATION $856.08 OCEAN MONITORING
147167 MIDWAY MFG.B MACHINING $7,370.97 MECHANICAL REPAIRS
147160 MINNESOTA WESTERN VISUAL PRES. $557.69 LAB SUPPLIES
147169 MISSION ABRASIVE SUPPLIES $553.20 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
147170 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3,840.97 UNIFORM RENTALS
147171 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO. $861.00 ELECTRIC PARTS
147172 MONITOR LABS $931.32 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
147173 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL E380.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES
147174 NEALSUPPLYCO. $674.80 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
147175 NEUTRON $7,014.50 ANIONIC POLYMER M.O.8-10.94
147176 NEW HORIZONS COMPUTER CENTER $4.800.00 COMPUTER TRAINING CLASSES
147177 NICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY $308.71 INDUSTRIAL GREASE
m 147178 OFFICE PAVILIONS6NTERIOR RESOURCES $599.09 OFFICE FURNITURE REPAIRS
X 147179 OLE LEE,INC. $69.27 TRUCK PARTS
147180 OMEGA CORP. $375.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
DC 147181 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE E7,400.44 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
147182 ORANGE VALVE 8 FITTING CO. $472.30 LAB SUPPLIES
147183 OXYGEN SERVICE $2,737.21 SPECIALTY GASES
n 147184 COUNTY OF ORANGE $401.50 PERMIT FEES
r
147185 PSI $117.06 HARDWARE
147188 PS51 E3,280.95 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION
147187 PACIFIC CLIPPINGS $126.70 NEWSPAPER CLIPPING SERVICES
147180 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $5.925.79 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
147189 PACIFIC PARTS $5.677.09 INSTRUMENT PARTS
147190 PACIFIC BELL $43.18 TELEPHONE SERVICES
147191 PAGENET $991.21 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
147192 PAINE WEBBER $42.020.63 COP REMARKETING FEES
147193 PAK WEST $1,376.18 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
147194 PARTS UNLIMITED $609.12 TRUCK PARTS
147195 PENINSULA PUMP CORP. $4,978.05 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
147196 PERMA SEAL $182.69 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
147197 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $5.484.84 REIMB.PETTY CASH,TRAINING 8 TRAVEL
147198 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $120,395.70 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3-29-95
147199 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS E315.72 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
147200 POLYPURE,INC. $22,416.41 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92
147201 POTTORFF COMPANY $64.53 ELECTRIC PARTS
147202 POWER SYSTEMS TESTING CO. $1,249.99 ELECTRICAL TESTING
147203 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $160.00 ICE
1472D4 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE IND. $2.280.00 SOIL TESTING
147205 PUBLIC SECTOR EXCELLENCE $5.000.00 TRAINING CATALOG DEVELOPMENT a PRODUCTION
FUND NO BIBS - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9114195 PAGE 5 '
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 092MS POSTING DATE 0920/95 ,
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
147205 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $410.69 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS
147207 R&R INSTRUMENTS $2,498.38 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
147200 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $2,062.75 TRASH REMOVAL
1472D9 RED WING SHOES $205.88 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES
147210 REMEDYTEMP $2,490.84 TEMPORARY PERSONNEL SERVICES
147211 RM MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL $236.43 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
147212 ST ANDREWS MACHINE CO. $88.20 MACHINE REPAIRS
147213 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS $975.50 ELECTRIC PARTS
147214 SANTA ANA PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL $2,221.43 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
147215 SANTA FE BAG CO. $297.65 OPERATING SUPPLIES
147210 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $551.69 SPECIALTY GASES
147217 SEA COAST DESIGNS $3.012.23 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
147218 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $1,833.58 HARDWARE
147219 SHURELUCK SALES $66.85 HARDWARE
147220 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO. $132.37 LAB SUPPLIES
147221 SKILL PATH,INC. $356.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING REGISTRATION
147222 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $250.12 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS
147223 M.LEE SMITH PUBLISHERS&ASSOC, $387.00 CA SAFETY&HEALTH MONITOR SUBSCRIPTION
In
m 147224 SNAP-ON/SUN CORP. $1,521.37 INSTRUMENT
2 147225 SO COAST AIR QUALITY $150.00 PERMIT FEES
147220 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY $1,315.60 PERMIT FEES
.. 147227 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. $10,553.02 POWER
147228 SO.CAL GAS.CO. $2.783.07 NATURAL GAS
y 147229 SO.CALIF.WATER CO. $64.65 WATER USE
147230 SOUTH SHORE $3.083.33 WINDOW WASHING SERVICES
147231 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER $2,929.34 DRINKING WATERICOOLER RENTALS
147232 WESTALLOY,INC. $463.97 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
147233 SPECIALIZED PRODUCTS CO. $1.090.91 TOOLS
147234 SPECTRON&ASSOCIATES $308.25 LAB SUPPLIES
147235 STERLINGART $90.96 OFFICE SUPPLIES
147236 SUPELCO,INC. 6168.65 LAB SUPPLIES
147237 SUPERB ONE-HOUR PHOTO $11.31 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
147M SUPER CHEM CORP. $400.82 CHEMICALS
147239 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $680.12 ELECTRIC CART PARTS
147240 TEKMAR COMPANY $700.86 LAB SUPPLIES
147241 TELA-TRAIN,INC. $195.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING REGISTRATION
147242 TELE-CELL,INC. $1,628.25 TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT
147243 THOMAS BROS MAPS 84,0D0.D0 PRINTING
147244 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 5497.15 MECHANICAL PARTS
147245 TONER SYSTEM INTERNATIONAL $1,400.21 PRINTING SUPPLIES
147245 TONYS LOCK&SAFE SERVICE $82.55 LOCKS&KEYS
147247 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE,INC. $644.35 SAFETY SUPPLIES
147248 TREBOR ELECTRONICS $682.68 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
147249 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $216.84 TRUCK PARTS
147250 TRUESDAIL LABS $5.587.00 LIB SERVICES
147251 JG TUCKERS SON,INC. $28.32 INSTRUMENT PARTS
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9114195 PAGE 6
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 09/20/95 POSTING DATE 0912WS
WARRANT NO. VENDOR
147252 20TH CENTURY INSURANCE CO. $3,369.27 LIABILITY CLAIM
147253 U.S.AUTO GLASS CENTERS $70.31 TRUCK PARTS
147254 US RENTALS $135.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
147255 UNISOURCEWOR BUTLER PAPER $336.40 OFFICE SUPPLIES
147256 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $500.42 PARCEL SERVICES
147257 VWR SCIENTIFIC $627.03 LAB SUPPLIES
147258 VALLEY CRIES SUPPLY CO. $3,314.87 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
147259 VARIABLE SPEED DRIVES $1,495.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS
147260 VARIAN ASSOCIATES,INC. $685.08 LAB SUPPLIES
147281 WEFTEC V5 $605.00 BIOSOUDS RECYCLING CONFERENCE REGISTRATION
147262 WACKENHUT CORP. $1,038.75 SECURITY SERVICES
147263 WAL-CON CONSTRUCTION CO. $121,326.87 CONSTRUCTION 5.373
147254 WARRINGTON $115.00 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS
147265 WATERS CORPORATION $8,489.48 LAB SUPPLIES
147266 WAXIE $1.067.85 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
147267 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $11,260.15 CAUSTIC SODA&HYPOCHLORIDE M.O.8-12-92&4.13-94
147208 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $988.65 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
147269 XEROX CORP. $1,074.09 COPIER LEASES
f1l 147270 YELLOW SPRINGS INSTRUMENT CO. $54.74 INSTRUMENT PARTS
X 147271 JOHNSON YOKOGAWA CORP. $2,373.69 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
2
to TOTAL CLAIMS PAID W20M $2,090,328.06
n
m
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/14195 PAGE 7 '
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 09120MS POSTING DATE 09/20I85
WARRANT NO. VENDOR
SUMMARY AMOUNT
01 CONSTR FUND $6,317.55
02 OPER FUND 33.50
02 CONSTR FUND 14,289.03
03 OPER FUND 37,355.15
03 CAP FAC FUND 182.849.43
03 CONSTR FUND 14,032.44
05 OPER FUND 16,024.16
05 CAP PAC FUND 14.41
05 CONSTR FUND 2,172.60
06 CONSTR FUND 1.232.01
07 0PER FUND 4,620.15
07 CAP FAC FUND 579.72
07 CONSTR FUND 2,128.09
011 OPER FUND 10,575.78
m 011 CAP FAC FUND 324,080.56
X 011 CONSTR FUND 1.525.31
.�. 013 CONSTR FUND 47.18
w 014 CAP FAC FUND 1,675.00
014 CONSTR FUND 277.52
0586 CAP FAC FUND 121.382.77
]? JT OPER FUND 620.187.44
V DORF 560,310.76
SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND 52.888.38
.IT DIST WORKING CAPITAL 115,727.22
2,090,328.06
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 09/28/95 PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID IOM/95 POSTING DATE ID104/95
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
147292 A-1 FENCE CO INC. $630.00 GATE REPAIR
147293 ACWAISALARY SURVEY $120.00 SALARY&BENEFITS SURVEY
147294 AGTECHCOMPANY $56,609.93 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91
147295 ASL CONSULTING ENGINEERS $1,807.50 ATWOOD SUBTRUNK PLAN PREPARATION
147296 ATM AA,INC. $150.00 LAB SERVICES
147297 AT&T-CELLULAR CR&R $1.87 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
147298 ACADEMIC PRESS $356.05 PUBLICATIONS
147299 ACCUSLUDGE $400.99 LAB SUPPLIES
147300 ADVANCED COOLING TECHNOLOGY $24341 ELECTRIC PARTS
147301 AIR LIOUIDE AMERICA CORP. $2,245.00 SPECIALTY GASSES
147302 ALHAMBRA FOUNDRY CO LTD $3,769.10 MANHOLE FRAMES&COVERS
147303 ASCE CONTINUING EDUCATION $402.50 SAFETY VIDEO PROGRAM
147304 AMERIDATA $851.23 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
147305, AMERICAN METAL BEARING CO $1,038.75 BEARINGS
147306 AMERICAN PROTECTIVE SERVICE,INC. $326.40 SECURITY SERVICE
147307 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION $5,229.25 SEWER REPAIRS
147308 BLAKE P ANDERSON $171.86 CELLULAR PHONE REIMBURSEMENT
147309 ANIXTER-DISTRIBUTION $1,298.02 COMPUTER SUPPLIES
M 147310 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $1,702.88 NOTICES&ADS
Z 147311 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $952.45 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
147312 ABC LABORATORIES $1.395.00 LAB SERVICES
147313 ARMOR-VAC $1.680.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES
147314 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE,INC. $6.208.00 TOXIC WASTE REMOVAL
147315 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. $60.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL
i 147316 ASSOCIATED CONCRETE PRODUCTS $174.55 BUILDING MATERIALS
147317 ATKINIJONES COMPUTER SERVICE $321.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT
147318 AWARDS&TROPHIES $14.09 PLAQUES
147319 BFI MEDICAL WASTE SYSTEMS $4.00 WASTE DISPOSAL
147320 BANCROFT-WHITNEY CO.. $139.00 PUBLICATION
147321 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $120.25 BATTERIES
147322 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $3.317.73 LAB SUPPLIES
147323 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $431.30 TRUCK WASH TICKETS
147324 BIO-GRO DIVISION $52,443.84 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M04-26-95
147325 BLAIR-MARTIN CO,INC. $513.13 VALVE MANIFOLDS
147326 BOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE $468.70 TRUCK REPAIRS
147327 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $17,035.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-18
147328 BUDGET JANITORIAL $3.330.00 JANITORIAL SERVICES M01-12-94
147329 BURKE ENGINEERING CO, $52.14 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
147330 BUSH&ASSOCIATES,INC. $15.332.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6-8-94
147331 CALFON CONSTRUCTION $28,839.67 CONSTRUCTION 7.22&7-24
147332 CALTROL,INC. $1.985.20 HARDWARE
147333 CALIFORNIA AUTO COLLISION.INC. $1.195.08 TRUCK BODY REPAIR
147334 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $1,450.87 SERVICE AGREEMENT
147335 COS MOVING EQUIPMENT $320.02 PLASTIC TOTE BOXES
147336 CAMALI CORP. 5400.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
147337 CANUS CORPORATION $38,378.38 FIBER OPTIC CABLE
FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 0928195 PAGE2 -
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID VIMV95 POSTING DATE 10/04/95
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
147338 CARLETON ENGINEERS $1,260.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES-AIR QUALITY
147339 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $10,964.79 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-M,J-33
147340 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $275.11 OFFICE FURNITURE
147341 CENTURY SAFETY INST.S SUPPLY $4,199.08 SAFETY SUPPLIES
147342 CERFNET $32.50 COMPUTER SERVICES
147343 CHROME CRANKSHAFT,INC. $960.00 PUMP PARTS
147344 CLEMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL $14,708.06 CONSULTANT4ANDFILL PROJECT M07-31-95
147345 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $153.00 SERVICEAGREEMENT
147346 COASTALMOTION $1,332.00 SEMI-ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP FEE
147347 COLE-PALMER INSTRUMENT CO. - MOSS LAB SUPPLIES
147348 COMPUSA,INC. $678.83 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
147349 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST 85,447.40 ELECTRIC PARTS
147350 CONSUMER PIPE $1,384.43 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
147351 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC. $977.81 TOOLS
147352 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $2.235.59 ENGINE PARTS
147353 COUNTERPART ENTERPRISES $1.497.04 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
147354 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 5514.02 ELECTRIC PARTS
147355 D.T.I. $50.00 CHEMICALS
rn 147356 DE GUELLE 8 SONS GLASS CO $300.00 SAFETY GLASS
X 147357 DEZURIK AND/OR CS CO. $4,521.19 VALVES
147358 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $8.109.33 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
to 147359 DISPOSABLE WASTE SYS.B OR JWC ENVIRONMENTAL $244.31 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
147360 ESP NORTH $112.81 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
141361 EASTMAN,INC. $2,705.62 OFFICE SUPPLIES
147362 EDWARDS DIV.OF GS BLDG SYS. 862.35 SERVICEAGREEMENT
N 147383 EMERGENCY MGMT NETWORK $520.00 CPRIFIRSTAIDTRAINING
147364 ENCHANTER,INC. $4,200.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.52495
147365 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $1.011.70 LAB SERVICES
147366 FST SAND AND GRAVEL,INC. $769.35 ROAD BASE MATERIALS
147367 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $50.00 AIR FREIGHT
147368 FIBERTRON $1.192.01 FIBER OPTIC CABLE
147369 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $161.21 FILTERS
147370 FIRST CHOICE $389.84 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT
147371 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $101.42 LAB SUPPLIES
147372 FISONS INSTRUMENTS 571,527.35 SERVICE AGREEMENT
147373 CLIFFORD A FORKERT $825.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.641-94
147374 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA 87.62 PHOTO SUPPLIES
147375 FREEDOM IMAGING $59.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
147376 FRY'S ELECTRONICS $8.450.05 ELECTRONIC B COMPUTER SUPPLIES
147377 GET,INC. $210.38 OFFICE SUPPLIES
147378 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $1.610.25 LUMBERJHARDWARE
147379 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $8,696.42 TELEPHONE SERVICES
147380 GIERLICH-MITCHELL,INC. $7,110.12 PUMP PARTS
147381 BEVERLY MAY GILLIAM $395.10 PAYROLL DEDUCTION REIMBURSEMENT
147382 GOUT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOC. $55.00 PUBLICATIONS _
147383 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $1,077.29 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE =8195 PAGE 3
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 10/04/95 POS71NO DATE 10/04/95
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
147394 GRASSY S.T.I. $857.00 ENGINE PARTS
147365 DGA CONSULTANTS $10,707.77 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.64494
147386 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $428.03 TRUCK PARTS
147387 HACH COMPANY $2.939.22 LAB SUPPLIES
147388 HATCH&KIRK,INC. $309.69 TRUCK PARTS
147389 KAULAWAY CONTAINERS $4,055.00 CONTAINER RENTALS
147390 HELPMATES PERSONNEL SERVICES $1,036.08 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
147391 HEWLETT PACKARD $53.88 SERVICEAGREEMENT
147392 HOLMES B NARVER,INC. $38,972.96 ENGINEERING SERVICES MO 9.14-94
147393 HOME DEPOT $84.62 HARDWARE
147394 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $665.90 PAINT SUPPLIES
147395 IPCO SAFETY $3,485.49 SAFETY SUPPLIES
147396 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $79.552.98 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.11.18-92
147397 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $1.080.25 CONNECTORS
147398 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. $571.01 TRUCK PARTS
147399 CLEAN AIR REPORT $585.00 PUBLICATION
147400 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $573.82 BATTERIES
147401 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $67.02 WATER USEAGE
M 147402 J2 PRINTING SERVICES $321.10 PRINTING
X 147403 JAMES INSTRUMENTS,INC. $1,827.00 ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT
��. 147404 JAMISON ENGINEERING $1,586.98 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
147405 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY. $203.86 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
147406 KENNEDY HYDRAULICS $431.69 MOTOR REPAIRS
147407 KING BEARING,INC. $4.933.03 MACHINE SUPPLIES
147408 KLEINFELDER $1,552.95 OEOTECHNICAL CONSULTING SERVICES
W 147409 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $5.755.50 TOOLS
147410 LASERALL CORP. $1.034.81 PRINTER REPAIR
147411 LEE&RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC. $5.297.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES
147412 JAMES E.LENIHAN COMPANY $12,700.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
147413 LEWCO ELECTRIC $T7.27 TRUCK PARTS
147414 LIMITORQUE CORP. 12.883.19 ELECTRIC PARTS
147415 SOCO-LYNCH CORP $117.58 JANITORIAL SERVICES
147416 MACOMCO $484.10 SERVICE AGREEMENT
147417 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $285.266.00 CONSTRUCTION P2.42-2
147418 MCKENNA ENGR.&EQUIP. S272.40 PUMP PARTS
147419 MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. $903.78 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
147420 MIDWAY MFG.&MACHINING $225.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS
147421 MISSION INDUSTRIES $4.601.30 UNIFORM RENTALS
147422 MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION $30.359.36 CONSTRUCTION 14-14A
147423 MORELAND&ASSOCIATES $15.843.50 AUDITING SERVICES NO 3-8-95
147424 MORTON SALT S416.57 SALT
147425 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION $461.76 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL FEE
147426 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $70.35 SAFETY FILM RENTALS
147427 NEUTRON $5.264.08 ANIONIC POLYMER M.O.8-10.94
147428 NEW HORIZONS COMPUTER CENTERS,INC. $4,800.00 SOFTWARE TRAINING CLASSES
147429 NICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY $1,514.78 LUBRICANTSIDIESEL FUEL
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 092W95 PAGE4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 10/04/95 POSTING DATE 1070U95
WARRANTNO. VENDOR AMOUNT
147430 NORTEL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS $57.53 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS
147431 OI CORPORATION $671.90 LAB SUPPLIES
147432 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $452.79 SAFETY GLASSES
147433 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION - $7.16 OFFICE SUPPLIES
147434 ORACLE CORPORATION $14,287.65 SOFTWARE
147435 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL $1,420.73 CHEMICALS
147436 ORANGE COUNTY FARM SUPPLY $852.38 CHEMICALS
147437 ORANGE COURIER $96.60 COURIER SERVICES
147438 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. $575.78 FITTINGS
147439 OXYGEN SERVICE $1,283.70 SPECIALTY GASES
147440 COUNTY OF ORANGE $735.00 USER FEE CHANGE PROCESSING
147441 OSDOC WORKERS COMP INSURANCE ACCOUNT $2,146.69 WORKERS COMPENSATION REIMBURSEMENT
147442 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $1,269.95 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
147443 PACIFIC PARTS $28,200.58 INSTRUMENT PARTS
147444 PACIFIC BELL $1,354.18 TELEPHONE SERVICES
147445 PASCAL&LUDWIG,INC. 551,191.00 CONSTRUCTION PI-38-2
147446 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $7.890.77 REIMS.PETTY CASH,TRAINING&TRAVEL
147447 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $107.365.50 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3.29.95
M 147448 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS $22.750.00 CONSULTING SERVICE
X 147449 PITNEY BOWES $83.69 POSTAGE METER TAPE
.�. 147450 POLYMETRICS,INC. $1.262.75 LAB SUPPLIES
W 147451 POLYPURE,INC. $34.023.88 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92
147452 POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO. $660.40 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
147453 RAROLD PRIMROSE ICE 5760.00 ICE FOR SAMPLES
147454 PROMINENT FLUID CONTROL,INC. $799.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL
t 147455 REISH MARINE STUDIES,INC. 5960.00 OCEAN MONITORING
147456 RELIANCE ELECTRIC $1.575.82 ELECTRIC PARTS
147457 REMEDYTEMP $1,830.40 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
147458 RM MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL ANWOR RITTAL $169.63 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
147459 ROSEMOUNT ANALYRCAL,INC. $868.42 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
147460 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS $487.75 ELECTRIC PARTS
147461 SANTA FE BAG CO. $243.11 FREIGHT
147462 SANWABANK $6.086.42 CONSTRUCTION 14-1-1A
147463 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTL $221.921.19 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.648-94
147464 R.CRAIG SCOTT&ASSOC. $8.922.40 LEGAL SERVICES-PERSONNEL ISSUES
147466 SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS,INC. $232.00 LAB REPAIRS
147466 SELCO PRODUCTS CO. $413.58 METER CONNECTOR
147467 SENTIENT SYSTEMS,INC. $10,800.00 FACILITATOR SERVICES-EXECUTNE RETREAT
147465 SHAMROCKSUPPLY $46.11 TOOLS
147469 SHURELUCK SALES $2.724.55 TOOLSHARDWARE
147470 SMITH-EMERY CO. 5405.00 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-13.96
147471 WATTER SMITH&ASSOCIATES $899.00 EMMISSIONS WORKSHOP
147472 SOUTH COAST WATER 5160.00 LAB SUPPLIES
147473 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. $70,765.05 POWER
147474 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $2,183.29 NATURAL GAS
147475 STAMEN Z.SPASSOFF P.E. $12,800.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19-2
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 09/2895 PAGE 5
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 109495 POSTING DATE IGM495
WARRANT NO. VENDOR , AMOUNT
147476 SPECIAL PLASTIC SYSTEMS,INC. $110.71 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
147477 SPECIALIZED PRODUCTS CO. $110.03 OFFICETOOLS
147478 SPIDERS PAPER E85.10 OFFICE SUPPLIES
147479 SUMMIT STEEL E339.41 METAL
147480 TEKTRONIX,INC. $1,285.71 INSTRUMENT PARTS
147481 TELEDYNE ANALYTICAL $153.31 INSTRUMENT PARTS
147482 THEODORE ROBBINS FORD $2.909.24 VEHICLE RENTAL-SUMMER PROGRAM
147483 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $1,482.89 MECHANICAL PARTS
147494 TONY'S LOCK&SAFE SERVICE $90.63 LOCKS&KEYS
147485 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $74.01 TRUCK PARTS
147486 TRUESDAIL LABS $150.00 LAB SERVICES
147487 JG TUCKER&SON,INC. E3,29IA8 INSTRUMENT PARTS
147488 USA BLUE BOOK $358.34 PUBLICATION
147489 UNISOURCEWOR BUTLER PAPER E442.81 OFFICE SUPPLIES
147490 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $53.81 PARCEL SERVICES
147491 UNITED VAN LINES,INC. $8.584.80 RELOCATION SERVICES
147492 VWR SCIENTIFIC $998.83 LAB SUPPLIES
147493 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $2.33 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
m 147494 VALLEY DETROIT DIESEL $1,153.46 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
X
x 147495 VERNE'S PLUMBING E285.00 PLUMBING SERVICES
147496 VERTEX SYSTEMS E1,836.00 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT
147497 WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION $257.45 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT COURSES
147490 WAXIE $5,533.70 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
Co 147499 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $10,970.50 CAUSTIC SODA&HYPOCHLORIDE M.O.&12-92&4-13-94
I 1475M ROURKE,WOODRUFF&SPRADLIN $124,885.82 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.2-19-92
147501 YELLOW SPRINGS INSTRUMENT CO. $63.79 LAB SUPPLIES
147602 RICHARD YOUNG PRODUCTS $418.29 INSTRUMENT PARTS
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 10/0495 $1,694,387.04
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 09R8/95 PAGE 6
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 10/04/95 POSTING DATE 1010410
SUMMARY AMOUNT
#1 OPER FUND $226.00
#2 OPER FUND $3.725.95
62 CAP FAC FUND $38.780.46
#3 OPER FUND $34.380.66
#3 CAP FAC FUND $46.873.04
#5 OPER FUND $11.618.76
#7 OPER FUND $6,136.01
97 CAP FAC FUND $55.857.59
#11 OPER FUND $861.43
011 CAP FAC FUND $15.000.45
914 OPER FUND $762.17
#14 CAP PAC FUND 847.688.66
05&6 OPER FUND $2,741.59
#5&6 CAP FAC FUND $1.354.37
#6&7 OPER FUND $2,930.72
#7&14 OPER FUND $5,643.39
JT OPER FUND $797,137.03
CORF $461,785.16
X SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $25,657.34
= JT DIST WORKING CAPTAL $135,017.29
&1.694,367.04
l21
Did
Cl
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10106195 PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 10MM6 POSTING DATE 10/06M
WARRANT NO. VENDOR - AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
147503 ACORN CONSULTING $1,430.00 CONSULTING SERVICES
$1,430.00
SUMMARY AMOUNT
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $1,430.00
$1,430.00
m
X
x
to
..
It"
v
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
) SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, I hereby certify that
the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7,
11, 13 and 14 held on L C%f 14 t- a3 19L, was duly�posted for public
inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this .may_, day of
(' ( � !` c ' 19%�
Penny Kyle, Sei r to c each of the
Boards of Directo s pf ounty Sanitation
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & i4
of Orange County, California
95/FamLF31A