The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1995-07-31 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127.FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 10844 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 (714)962-2411 July 28, 1995 URGENT * * * URGENT * * * URGENT NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CAUFORNIA MONDAY. JULY 31, 1995 - 7:30 P.M- DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 A Special Meeting of the Joint Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, will be held at the above location, date and time. G � ' Secretary of B rds bf Directors AGENDA BOARDS OF DIRECTORS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 SPECIAL MEETING JULY 31, 1995 -7:30 P.M. n ascot anr�Tevnih-the requirements of Cahfomia Govemmenl Code Section 549542 this sae etfa§-tseer[pbsted in the main I*fof the Districts'.Administrative Officesnot less thar 2hours nor to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to �acYfi igen>ifTa RA mare available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. ��n1he ----Wnatter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Boards dor�iscfisSton and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an emencyilemorthat there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the atteriiton o71Fia Districts subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. _ j (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll call (3) Appointment of Chair pro lem, if necessary (4) Public Comments, All persons wishing to address the Boards on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot have action taken by the Boards of Directors except as authorized by Section 54954.2(b). 07/31/95 (5) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Staff report regarding a proposal concerning the bankruptcy. (b) Consideration of actions regarding the proposal. (6) ALL DISTRICTS CLOSED SESSION: Dunng the course of conducting the business set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting ofthe Boards,the Chair may convene the _ Boards in closed session to consider matters of pending orpotential Itigation,or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9,54957 of i 54957.6. li Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employment actonsor negotiations with .l employee representatives; or which are exempt from pubhcdisclosgre undef the California Public Records Act, may be revewed.byme doing s'-cdudngFUN. �- permitted closed session and are not available for publicinsp6ctido mAfsaCf time as final actions are taken by the Boards on any of these subjeols TheW F -minutes will reflect all required disclosures ofinfcmiation. —m (a) Convene in closed session, if necessary (b) Consideration of actions relative to the proposal. (c) Reconvene in regular session (d) Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session (7) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (8) ALL DISTRICTS Matters which a Director would like staff to report on at a subsequent meeting (9) ALL DISTRICTS Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff report (10) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (11) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to adjourn J1wPNLeSW 07A -2 July 31, 1995 MOTIONS FOR CONSIDERATION BY THE JOINT BOARDS 1. Pursue the concept of purchasing the County's operating landfills, after due diligence efforts and after negotiation with representatives of the County, at a price to be considered at a future meeting of the Joint Boards. 2, Authorize staff to establish professional service agreements with consultants to review the financial, operational and regulatory aspects of ownership of the landfills and report back to the Directors at a future meeting of the Joint Boards. 3. Authorize the Joint Chairman to establish an Ad Hoc Advisory Committee regarding the landfills to be empowered to advise staff, meet and confer with representatives of the County and to act on behalf of the Joint Boards to an extent to be determined by the Joint Boards. nwwaaowummiwororvs.eas operating costs range between $13-17 a ton, Chip Clements will get to that a little bit more in detail. We know through our surveys that is the basic operating range of operating landfills today. The County had been in the low 20's. Their budget now reflects and operating cost of$31.51 although that does include capital projects. Our first order estimate is that the landfills can probably be operating for about $18.50 a ton so there is room for improvement there. But we will require extreme due diligence in order to be able to really understand the associated operating and administrative costs required to keep the landfills operating. Not on the operating side, but there are reserve accounts that we will get to. Future Capital Needs: we need to get our hands around this one. The annual County budget has ranged between $8-20 million a year, $20 million on the front end for the sake of the opening capital costs of Olinda-Alpha. First order estimates of looking at that$35 a ton tipping rate we think can probably collect about$8 million a year in capital needs system wide. We have to look carefully to see what room we'll have to be able to take rare of the front end need at Olinda-Alpha. The County has assumed it is pay as you go. We'll have to look at debt as a way to capitalize things like the development at Olinda Alpha. Liability. ownership and operation of the existing landfills will certainly carry liability for the pre-existing and future conditions arising from the landfills. Once you've been operating a landfill for some time, it will be very tough to extract this agency from any kind of liability—groundwater, other environmental issues, public liability and things that might happen related to the landfill. One issue, which John you touched on was what about the other 21 closed landfills. We'll have to work very carefully to box ourselves out of that, however, there needs to be JC: We have had, believe it or not, some very positive signs from some of the supervisors that have promise. I don't know that we have three votes yet, but that, along with some other strategies is what we are trying to achieve. Our next step is the due diligence, let me—I have a motion to make, to prepare, when you are ready for it, but are there any other questions right now. Remember, we're not signing anything, but let me read this to you, there is...well, thank you Sheldon. Remember our strategy, in concept here, was to try to put forth something that raises $415 million to get us all out of debt, so if any of you want to put a group of 6 or 10 together that can raise $415 million, go for it, because that's the challenge. But what we are suggesting we do on our side, because the landfill is our issue, and that's, #1, to ask you endorse, in concept only, the purchase of the County operating landfills after due diligence efforts and after negotiations with representatives of the county at a price to be considered at a future meeting by the joint boards. So we're just looking to do our due diligence, continue to examine that#1. #2, Authorize staff to establish a professional service agreements with consultants to review the financial, operational, regulatory aspects of the ownership of the landfills and report back to the directors at a future meeting of the joint boards. #3, Authorize the joint Chairman to establish an Ad Hoc Committee Advisory Committee regarding the landfills to be empowered to advise staff, meet and confer with representatives of the County, act on behalf of the joint boards, to the extent determined by the joint boards, but not reach any kind of agreement until everybody has signed off on that,just to make that clear. Second motion? Authorize staff to establish a 5� Professional Services Agreement with consultants to review financial, operational, regulatory aspects of the ownership of the landfills and report back to the directors at a future meeting. Jim? (inaudible) Well, it's probably going to be contingent on a lot of things, but that's what the due diligence will uncover over time. We started out talking about this some time ago with even out the OCTA thing I think it's still worthy of us looking at it, especially as Sheldon points out that those of us who are in the cities in this thing are very concerned about the landfill costs. ?: OCTA doesn't have any other alternatives, their money is going to get taken otherwise. JC: Jan and then Vic. (inaudible) Yes, that will all be a part of the process we have to go through. If we don't have that, it's not going to work. Vic? (inaudible) I said endorse, sure, it's direction is what we're giving. What was the word again, pursue? OK, sure. Ok, all in favor, or any opposed? All right, it's unanimous. I don't think we have anything, you got it, we're out of here, Thank you very much for your time. LANDFILL ACQUISITION - KEY ISSUES ■ Deal Points ■ Tipping Fees / Competition / Flow Control ■ Operating Costs ■ Future Capital Needs ■ Liability ■ Reserve Requirements ■ Debt Service ■ Governance and Policy Issues ■ Cities' Role f DEAL POINTS ■ CSDOC acquires title to and operates up to active four County landfills: • Brea Olinda • Santiago Canyon (now at very low volume) • Frank Bowerman (formerly named Bee Canyon) • Prima Deshecha ■ In accordance with the Consortium/OCIP proposal, purchase price of landfill system of approximately $200 million is paid to the County. ■ Existing landfill system long-term debt of approximately $80 million is refinanced. ■ Existing landfill system operating reserves transferred to CSDOC. i TIPPING FEES / COMPETITION / FLOW CONTROL ■ Present tipping fee $35.00/ton (effective July 1 , 1995) ■ Southern California landfills highly competitive--today ■ But, future tipping fees in Southern California may rise as landfills close and economy improves ■ Revenues directly proportional to waste volume ■ Flow control (specified destination of trash) needed to guarantee revenues--or raise tipping fees accordingly ■ Long-term hauling contracts will have to be amended to effectively and economically issue debt OPERATING COSTS ■ Southern California landfills operate at $13 to $17/ton. ■ Orange County budgets at $31 .51/ton--including capital projects. ■ CSDOC first order estimate of $18.50/ton. ■ Due diligence on all associated operating and administrative costs required. FUTURE CAPITAL NEEDS ■ Annual County budget has ranged from $8 to $20 million per year. ■ Capital costs for landfills vary according to size, engineering problems, ground water, environmental regulation, and nuisance mitigation. ■ CSDOC first order estimate of $8 million per year. ■ Due diligence analysis required; in particular, Olinda Alpha development costs. LIABILITY ■ Ownership and operation of existing landfills will certainly carry liability for pre-existing and future conditions arising from the landfills. ■ Query: How will the ongoing liability for the 21 closed landfills be funded? Even without direct responsibility, should tipping fee be collected? ■ Environmental, regulatory and public liability are included. ■ Reserves and/or insurance needed to cover future liability. RESERVE REQUIREMENTS ■ Present status of County reserves approximately $30 million after bankruptcy. ■ Post-closure reserves of approximately $315 million needed. ■ Santiago, if purchased, will required $40 million of short-term closure costs. ■ Annual cost of closure reserves and Santiago note--$9 million. ■ Due diligence required here, too. DEBT SERVICE ■ $80 million existing debt can be restructured. ■ $200 million new debt issued to cover assumed purchase price. ■ Annual debt service $22.5 million, assuming 1 .3: 1 coverage and 8% bond. GOVERNANCE AND POLICY ISSUES ■ Sanitation Districts in California can (and do) operate landfills. ■ A landfill does not have to be within our sphere of influence for us to own/operate it. ■ Future consideration of tipping fee increases/decreases by the Sanitation Districts' Board of Directors will translate to refuse collection for increases/decreases within the cities. CITIES' ROLE ■ Flow control required. ■ Voluntary amendments to contracts required. ■ Cities get far more say in operation of Solid Waste System. Pool Participants Costs 0 0 0 ® 0 • Costs - Recourse on $444 million of Repayment Claims - $415 million cash - Debt limitation litigation - Allowing debts to be paid ahead of the Settlement Secured Claim Y o County Benefits • Benefits - Immediate repayment of all note debt, vendor debt, Superior Court Interpleader deposits, Court-directed payments to minors. - Non-recourse treatment on $444 million of OCIP claims - Avoids cost and cumbersome process of a plan of adjustment. - Eliminates debt limitation litigation - Bankruptcy ends r . County Costs • Costs - Loss of Airport and Landfill - $445 million of Debt Reserves - County subordinates its remaining loss to pool participants - Loss of control of the litigation and bankruptcy ® m ® o ® Results • Municipal market is reassured. - $800M of Note debt is repaid - Provides a $50M first priority to Orange County Schools from the sale of the COPs. • All claims other than governmental entities are paid. - Vendor claims are paid - Superior Court Interpleader Deposits and Court directed payments to minors are restored • Schools remain first priority • Permits a quick resolution of the bankruptcy. Objectives • Contain Orange County government problems in Orange County • Pay all bond and vendor debt • Restore investor confidence in Orange County government • Continue to place schools as a priority • End the Orange County bankruptcy The Plan • A Consortium of government agencies provides $415 million to finance County note shortfall and vendor debt • In exchange, County sells two assets -- John Wayne Airport and operating landfills -- to other government agencies • Revenue from asset sales and County note reserves retire the notes and vendor debt • Consortium agrees to purchase $110 million in Certificates of Participation • OCIP Committee consents to open the Settlement Agreement to allow for debt restructuring Three Steps to End Bankruptcy • Step 1 - Transfer John Wayne Airport and rights to a future airport at El Toro MCAS to the OCTA in exchange for urban rail capital funds. - Transfer title to operating landfills to the Orange County Sanitation Districts. - proceeds of the transfer are used, along with County's note reserves, to repay $800 million of Note Debt, Court directed payments to minors, Interpleader Deposits with the Superior Court and Vendor Debt. Three Steps to End Bankruptcy • Step 2 - Consortium agrees to purchase $ 110 million of Cops. - First $50 million goes to pay the schools. - Next $60 million goes to pay Settlement Secured Claims. Three Steps to End Bankruptcy • Step 3 - Remaining debts are restructured . Pool claims are combined into one claim - Pool claims will be non-recourse to the County after $265 million . - The County's loss will be the last paid . LANDFILL ACQUISITION - KEY ISSUES ■ Deal Points ■ Tipping Fees / Competition / Flow Control ■ Operating Costs ■ Future Capital Needs ■ Liability ■ Reserve Requirements ■ Debt Service ■ Governance and Policy Issues ■ Cities' Role DEAL POINTS ■ CSDOC acquires title to and operates up to active four County landfills: • Brea Olinda • Santiago Canyon (now at very low volume) • Frank Bowerman (formerly named Bee Canyon) • Prima Deshecha ■ In accordance with the Consortium/OCIP proposal, purchase price of landfill system of approximately $200 million is paid to the County. ■ Existing landfill system long-term debt of approximately $80 million is refinanced. ■ Existing landfill system operating reserves transferred to CSDOC. TIPPING FEES / COMPETITION / FLOW CONTROL ■ Present tipping fee $35.00/ton (effective July 1 , 1995) ■ Southern California landfills highly competitive--today ■ But, future tipping fees in Southern California may rise as landfills close and economy improves ■ Revenues directly proportional to waste volume ■ Flow control (specified destination of trash) needed to guarantee revenues--or raise tipping fees accordingly ■ Long-term hauling contracts will have to be amended to effectively and economically issue debt OPERATING COSTS ■ Southern California landfills operate at $13 to $17/ton. ■ Orange County budgets at $31 .51 /ton--including capital projects. ■ CSDOC first order estimate of $18.50/ton. ■ Due diligence on all associated operating and administrative costs required. FUTURE CAPITAL NEEDS ■ Annual County budget has ranged from $8 to $20 million per year. ■ Capital costs for landfills vary according to size, engineering problems, ground water, environmental regulation, and nuisance mitigation. ■ CSDOC first order estimate of $8 million per year. ■ Due diligence analysis required; in particular, Olinda Alpha development costs. LIABILITY ■ Ownership and operation of existing landfills will certainly carry liability for pre-existing and future conditions arising from the landfills. ■ Query: How will the ongoing liability for the 21 closed landfills be funded? Even without direct responsibility, should tipping fee be collected? ■ Environmental, regulatory and public liability are included. ■ Reserves and/or insurance needed to cover future liability. RESERVE REQUIREMENTS ■ Present status of County reserves approximately $30 million after bankruptcy. ■ Post-closure reserves of approximately $315 million needed. ■ Santiago, if purchased, will required $40 million of short-term closure costs. ■ Annual cost of closure reserves and Santiago note--$9 million. ■ Due diligence required here, too. DEBT SERVICE ■ $80 million existing debt can be restructured. ■ $200 million new debt issued to cover assumed purchase price. ■ Annual debt service $22.5 million, assuming 1 .3: 1 coverage and 8% bond. GOVERNANCE AND POLICY ISSUES ■ Sanitation Districts in California can (and do) operate landfills. ■ A landfill does not have to be within our sphere of influence for us to own/operate it. ■ Future consideration of tipping fee increases/decreases by the Sanitation Districts' Board of Directors will translate to refuse collection for increases/decreases within the cities. CITIES' ROLE ■ Flow control required. ■ Voluntary amendments to contracts required. ■ Cities get far more say in operation of Solid Waste System. Pool Participants Costs • Costs - Recourse on $444 million of Repayment Claims - $415 million cash - Debt limitation litigation - Allowing debts to be paid ahead of the Settlement Secured Claim County Benefits • Benefits - Immediate repayment of all note debt, vendor debt, Superior Court Interpleader deposits, Court-directed payments to minors. - Non-recourse treatment on $444 million of OCIP claims - Avoids cost and cumbersome process of a plan of adjustment. - Eliminates debt limitation litigation - Bankruptcy ends County Costs • Costs - Loss of Airport and Landfill - $445 million of Debt Reserves - County subordinates its remaining loss to pool participants - Loss of control of the litigation and bankruptcy Results • Municipal market is reassured . - $800M of Note debt is repaid - Provides a $50M first priority to Orange County Schools from the sale of the COPs. • All claims other than governmental entities are paid. - Vendor claims are paid - Superior Court Interpleader Deposits and Court directed payments to minors are restored • Schools remain first priority • Permits a quick resolution of the bankruptcy. Objectives • Contain Orange County government problems in Orange County • Pay all bond and vendor debt • Restore investor confidence in Orange County government • Continue to place schools as a priority • End the Orange County bankruptcy The Plan • A Consortium of government agencies provides $415 million to finance County note shortfall and vendor debt • In exchange, County sells two assets -- John Wayne Airport and operating landfills -- to other government agencies • Revenue from asset sales and County note reserves retire the notes and vendor debt • Consortium agrees to purchase $110 million in Certificates of Participation • OCIP Committee consents to open the Settlement Agreement to allow for debt restructuring Three Steps to End Bankruptcy o � mma • Step 1 - Transfer John Wayne Airport and rights to a future airport at El Toro MCAS to the OCTA in exchange for urban rail capital funds. - Transfer title to operating landfills to the Orange County Sanitation Districts. - Proceeds of the transfer are used, along with County's note reserves, to repay $800 million of Note Debt, Court directed payments to minors, Interpleader Deposits with the Superior Court and Vendor Debt. Three Steps to End Bankruptcy • Step 2 - Consortium agrees to purchase $ 110 million of Cops. - First $50 million goes to pay the schools . - Next $60 million goes to pay Settlement Secured Claims. Three Steps to End Bankruptcy • Step 3 - Remaining debts are restructured . Pool claims are combined into one claim - Pool claims will be non-recourse to the County after $265 million . - The County's loss will be the last paid . Pool Participants Benefits • Benefits - Purchase airport and landfills - More control of the litigation - $50 million for the schools and $60 million for Settlement Secured Claims - Remaining OCIP claims are ahead of the County - End of Bankruptcy - No more funding raids a COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA FAX TRANSMITTAL FORM DATE: July 28, 1995 APPROXIMATE TIME: 2:00 p.m. TO: See attached list for distributionORG: FAX NO.:( ) TO: ORG: FAX NO.:( ) TO: ORG: FAX NO.:( ) TO: ORG: FAX NO.:( ) Total number of pages being transmitted(including this transmittal form): 5 SUBJECT: SPECIAL MEETING - JULY 31, 1995 - 7:30 P.M. ! ! ! ! 111 ! 1!1 PRIORITY: ® Urgent ❑ Per Your Request ❑ FYI ❑ Per Our Conversation ❑ Other Reply Needed: ❑ Yes X❑ No Original will be forwarded via: ® U.S. Mail ❑ Air Express ❑ Messenger ❑ Original will not be forwarded SPECIAL NOTES: PLEASE DELIVER RIMEDIATELY TO THE ADDRESSEE LISTED ON THE ATTACHED PAGE! !! ! FROM: Penny Kyle, Hoard Secretary EM; 2026 Transmitting Operator: Penny Kyle Ext: 2026 NOTE: If you encounter any difficulty in receiving the total number of pages indicated above, PLEASE CALL BACK AS SOON AS POSSIBLE AT(714)962.2411 AND ASK FOR THE TRANSMITTING OPERATOR. CSDOC DEPARTMENT FAX NUMBERS FOR REPLY: E3 Administration. . . . . . . . . . . (714)962-0356 ❑ Control Center- Plant 1 . . . . . . . (714)965-6777 ❑ Personnel . . . . . . . . . . . . . (714)962-0427 ❑ Operations Center- Plant 2 . . . . . (714)968-2330 ❑ Finance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (714)962-3954 ❑ Engineering . . . . . . . . . . . . . (714)962-5018 ❑ Purchasing . . . . . . . . . . . . (714)965-0728 ❑ Constr. Mgmt- Plant 1 . . . . . . . . (714)964-4775 ❑ Oper. 8 Mntce . . . . . . . . . . (714)962-8379 ❑ Constr. Mgmt- Plant 2 . . . . . . . . (714)965-2156 ❑ Technical Services . . . . . . . . (714)962.6957 ❑ Laboratory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (714)962-2591 (Camery d.o .R,ry k&R,.dSm.Control) L, (AirQualipYComplia,re/7<bormoryl P.O.Hux Ball] Powtxin Velky,CA 927284127 Y„ Tekph..:(714)962-2411 LIST OF ACTIVE DIRECTORS AND FAX NUMBERS 5IW95 \ Cecilia L. Age, Cypress 229-6682 George Brown, Seal Beach 310/431-4067 John Collins, Fountain Valley 965-4494 John Cox, Newport Beach 644-4002 Jan Debay, Newport Beach 644-3020 Barry Denes, Villa Park 998-1508 Shirley Dettloff, Huntington Beach 536-5233 Burnie Dunlap, Brea 990-2258 Norman Eckenrode, Placentia 961-0283 James Ferryman, CMSD 751-0126 James Flora, La Habra 310/905-9781 Don Gruen, Buena Park 310/598-8737 John Gullixson, Yorba Linda 993-7530 Barry Hammond, Irvine 724-6045 Victor Leipzig, Huntington Beach 536-5233 Wally Linn, La Palma 523-2141 Pat McGuigan, Santa Ana 647-6954 Mark Murphy, Orange 758-7539 Glenn Parker, Brea 255-9474 Margie Rice, MCSD 894-1260 Julie Sa, Fullerton 73"758 Thomas Saltarelli, Tustin 833-9486 Sapien, Sal A., Stanton 890-1443 Sheldon Singer, GGSD 530-1329 Roger Stanton, Supervisor 8345754 William Steiner, Supervisor 834-2045 Peer Swan, IRWD 720-1083 Charles Sylvia, Los Alamitos 310/493-1255 Daniel Welch, Yorba Linda 777-6903 Bob Zemel, Anaheim 254-4105 Tom Woodruff, General Counsel 835-7787 _ R COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 a n 10844 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 (714)962-2411 July 28, 1995 URGENT * * * URGENT * ** URGENT NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CAUFORNIA MONDAY, JULY 31, 1995 - 7:30 P.M. DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 A Special Meeting of the Joint Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, will be held at the above location, date and time. (�G Secretary of trr ds of Directors AGENDA BOARDS OF DIRECTORS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 SPECIAL MEETING JULY 31, 1995 -7:30 P.M. I In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this I agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the Districts' Administrative Offices not less ! i than 72 hours prior to the meeting dale and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection In the office of the Board Secretary. i In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Boards 1 for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an emergency item or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the attention of the Districts subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. j (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll call (3) Appointment of Chair pro tem, if necessary (4) Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Boards on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot have action taken by the Boards of Directors except as authorized by Section 549542(b). 07/31/95 (5) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Staff report regarding a proposal conceming the bankruptcy. (b) Consideration of actions regarding the proposal. (6) ALL DISTRICTS CLOSED SESSION During the course of conducting the business set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Boards,the Chair may convene the Boards in closed session to consider matters of pending or potential litigation,or personnel matters,pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9, 54957 or 54957.6. I I ) Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential Itlgation:(c) employment actions or negotiations wHh employee representatives; orwhich are exempt from public disclosure under ; the California Public Records Act,may be reviewed by the Boards during a I permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as final actions are taken by the Boards on any of these subjects, the I minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. L--::.._—._._.._._.._._.._.._..�..__..._._.._..._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.:_:......_.__._._._.._..�..1 (a) Convene in closed session, if necessary (b) Consideration of actions relative to the proposal. (c) Reconvene in regular session (d) Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session (7) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (8) ALL DISTRICTS Matters which a Director would like staff to report on at a subsequent meeting (9) ALL DISTRICTS Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff report (10) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (11) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to adjourn JawvooaasucasworA _y. 1. MEETING DATE: 7/31/95 TIME. 7:30 p.m. DISTRICTS: 1,2,3,5,6,7,11,13 & 14 DISTRICT 1 JOINT 00ARD6 IMORENOI . .......... MC WUIGAN ........ IWWMANI ................ AWE ......... . IPERRVI ............ FFRRVMAN ........ IHASTNO61. .......... BROWN ........... (COOhIUI ..........I MURRIY .......... ISCOTR WX .. .......... IPOTTS) ............ BALTAREW ........ IDEMVI COX ............. IST:INERI ...........NiTANbN ......... 9 ICO%1 ............... DEBAY'........... . IBEW ............... DENTS ........... IMUERI ............. DERLOFF ......... DISTRICT IPARI(ERI ............ WNLAP .......... — (SCOTT ............ W=S .......... (DOWNEY)............ ECKENRODE ....... (DULLIX6OM ......... WELCH ........... fKRRY) ........... MERRYMAN ........ _ IBELIJ .............. OEHE6 ............ (ANDERSON) ......... . RORA ........... . (PARKER) ... .. ...... WNLAP... ........ IMARSHALLI .......... GRIFFIN ........... WOWNEY) .. ........ EOIENRODE . ....... A'ELtlI .. ...... ..... OULLEX ON ........ (ANDEASONI ......... ROM ............ (WARD) ............. HAMMOND ........ (MORENOI ........... MCOUIOAN ........ (SAVER) ............. IEIRIW ........... — —(WONUI ........... MURR4Y .......... IMWER) ............. LEM ............. . MORAY) . ........... BA .............. (MORENO) ............ MC OUIOAN........ 2LAKET)............ SINGER ........... (WONT]a ............ WRPHY .......... (STEINER) ........... Sawl Y ......... MUNLAR ............ PARKER........... _ (DALYI ............. MMEL ............ . EPPERSONI........... RICE ............. MOREY) ............. EA .............. _ — DISTRICT S IPOTTSI ............. SALTAREW........ _ (DOTSON) ........... SAREN ........... IDOTSONI ............ EAREN ........... (PARKER) ........... WNLAP........... 2LAKET............. swam .. ...... (BOWMANI .......... AWE .......... ST:INERI............. STANTON ......... MASTNGSI.......... MOWN ISTANTINI ........... STEINER .......... (SWTT ............ COLLINS .......... (MILLER) ............. SWAN ............ _ _ _ IANDERSONI ......... ROM ............ (VYAHLSTROM) ........ SYLVIA ........... — (MARSHAW ......... GMFFIN ........... IOULLLC5001 ..1....... WELCH ........... UERI ............ IEIRIG . . .. ... .... IDALYI .............. 2EMEL ........... _ —Z — WERI ............ Law ............. IMOREN01 ........... MDO{IMAN ....... _ IEPPERSOwI.......... RXTi ........... STAFF OTHERS MORBYI M .............. ANDERSON . � WOODRUFF .. Je 2LAKET............ SINOM .. ....... HASENSTAB DEMW...... (STONER) ........... SEWIWSN ......... HODGES ... ✓ KNOW ..... RVAHLSTROMI ....... SYLVN ........... JONK ..... 7 LEE........— (DALY) ............: gLFL ............ am ..... LSIDSTROM.. UNDER .... NIXON...... DISTRICTS MCINYVAE.. i SHAW...... ICO%) .............. DESAY............ MMELLY .. STONE ..... (STANTONI .......... BTEINM........... OOTEN .... .......... (DEMVI ............ COX ............. . S174ED ... JL. .......... _ TALEW . ... .......... DISTRICTS �A' TORRES ... JG .......... IPERRYI ............ iERRYMAN......... g VINCENT ... .......... _ STANTON) ... ....... ODEBAY WNER........... WWfiOR ... (COX; . .. . ... ....... STEWEI ........... " DISTRICT 7 ATIfle"--#- IWARDI ............ MMMOND......... :COX) . ............ SALTARE.. ........ /✓'/wW,•.'!• ICOK) .............. RRAY............ IPERRYI ............ FEPRVFMN.......:: —_ MORE a;........... MCOLOAN ...... (STANTON)ICOOMURKW ........ ISTATO .......... 51EINEP........... /iAQ DISTINCT 11 ((�/(• IBAUERI ............ IEIPLIA ........... . IBAUERI .......... — (STEINER) ........... ROI/SSN ......... � — DISTRICT 13 IWELCHI ............ 0 LLLVSON _ (DALYI .......... ..!.L ............ (WONTLI ........... "ANY ........ y _ :DUNLAR ........ PRMRR�.......... L STANTON) .......... STEINER........... DISTRICT 14 IMMI ............ SALTARELLI ........ —_ ICOONTE) ........... WARN ........ (WARDI ......... HAMMOND......... _ ISTANTON) .......... STEINER........... OLIU2 IMILLERI ...... ...... SWAN ............ 1 0712"5