Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-07-26 o+P\tPl F f COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 T� pV 10844 ELLIS. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 II (714)962-2411 July 21, 1995 NOTICE OF MEETING JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA WEDNESDAY JULY 26. 1995 - 7:30 P.M. DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 The Regular Meeting of the Joint Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, will be held at the ... above location, time and dale. Board Secret Tentatively-Scheduled Upcoming Meetings: AD HOC COMMITTEE RE SPACE UTILIZATION STUDY FOR ADMINISTRATIVE EMPLOYEES - Tuesday, July 25, 1995, at 5:30 p.m. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS A ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 10944 ELLIB AVENUE NO.BOX 8127 I FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA BS 2) 014)M2.2411 JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES Executive Committee Meetinas Joint Board Meetinas July Jul 19, 1995 Jul 26, 1995 August None Scheduled Aug 23, 1995 September Sep 20, 1995 Sep 27, 1995 October Oct 18, 1995 Oct 25, 1995 November None Scheduled Nov 15, 1995 December None Scheduled Dec 13, 1995 January Jan 17, 1996 Jan 24, 1996 1 February Feb 21, 1996 Feb 28, 1996 March Mar 20, 1996 Mar 27, 1996 April Apr 17, 1996 Apr 24, 1996 May May 15, 1996 May 22, 1996 June Jun 19, 1996 Jun 26, 1996 July Jul 17, 1996 Ju124, 1996 �a1.' AGENDA JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 REGULAR MEETING JULY 26, 1995 - 7:30 P.M. In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this i agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the Districts' Administrative Offices not less I than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Boards ifor discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an I emergency item or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the { attention of the Districts subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a I supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. ......_............—.._.._..—................................._.._.._.._.._..._..._.._..-.._......_................ _.._.._.._.._.._._...I (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll call (3) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders) (4) Appointment of Chair pro tem, if necessary (5) Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Boards on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot have action taken by the Boards of Directors except as authorized by Section 54954.2(b). 07126/95 (6) The Joint Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. (a) Report of Joint Chair, consideration of Resolutions or commendations, presentations and awards (b) Report of General Manager (c) Report of General Counsel (7) (a) Annual election of Joint Chair: (Nominee: Director John C. Cox, Jr.) (b) Nomination and election of Vice Joint Chair (8) EACH DISTRICT ACTION: If no corrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair. District 1 - June 28, 1995 regular District 2 - June 28, 1995 regular District 3 - June 28, 1995 regular District 5 - June 28, 1995 regular District 6 - June 28, 1995 regular District 7 - June 28, 1995 regular District 11 - June 28, 1995 regular District 13 - June 28, 1995 regular District 14 - June 28, 1995 regular (9) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District.) 06/28/95 07/12/95 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $615,471.98 $936,231 .86 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 76,756.59 287,789.47 Joint Working Capital Fund - 255,664.00 134,867.36 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 41,882.03 71,739.57 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 1,527.83 69.45 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 9,208.89 3,372.19 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 381,814.92 169,491 .71 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 5,836.85 4,610.97 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 1,382.51 51.90 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 21,899.48 6,244.42 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 92,625.24 2,801 .59 DISTRICT NO. 13 - 0.00 2.55 DISTRICT NO. 14 - 359,372.16 46.98 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 692.93 2,363.04 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 211 .12 0.00 DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 786.56 20,543.13 $1 ,865,133.09 $1 ,640,226.19 -2- 07/26/95 (10) CONSENT CALENDAR- ITEMS 1001 THROUGH 10(fl All matters placed on the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate i discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action j approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent 1 calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order j of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, stale their name, address and designate by letter the item to be i removed from the consent calendar. l i The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. I L......................................._.._.._.._.._....._.._.._.._........................................................................... _.._� Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of Resolution No. 95-77, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Purchase of Anionic Polyelectrolyte Chemical Polymer, Specification No. C-035, to Polypure, Inc. for the price of$1.69 per pound, plus sales tax, for a one year period beginning August 1, 1995, with provision for four one-year extensions (Estimated annual cost $161,699.20 plus sales tax). (b) Consideration of motion authorizing membership in the Southern Califomia Alliance of Publicly Owned Treatment Works (SCAP) for the 1995-96 fiscal year. DISTRICT 2 (c) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-R1, authorizing an addition of$98,030.23 to the contract with Colich Bros., Inc. dba Colich & Sons, for four items of additional work, and granting a time extension of eight calendar days for completion of said additional work. DISTRICTS 3& 11 (d) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim of Colich Bros., Inc. dba Colich & Sons received June 21, 1995, in the amount of$300,208.22, plus unspecified additional expenses and legal expenses, for a fuel spill in connection with Slater Avenue Pump Station, Contract No. 11-17-1, and refer to the Districts' General Counsel and liability claims administrator for appropriate action. -3- 07/26/95 (10) DISTRICTS 5 & 6 (a) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3, Contract No. 5-37-3, for an addition of$60,458.08 to the contract with Wal-Con Construction Company for two items of additional work, and granting a time extension of 60 calendar days for completion of said additional work. DISTRICT 7 (f) Consideration of the following actions relative to Master Plans prepared by Boyle Engineering Corporation for Lemon Heights Sewer System, Contract No. 7-16, Orange Park Acres Sewer System, Contract No. 7-18, and Cowan Heights Sewer System, Contract No. 7-19: (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file Master Plan for Lemon Heights Sewer System, Contract No. 7-16. (2) Consideration of motion to receive and file Master Plan for Orange Park Acres Sewer System, Contract No. 7-18. (3) Consideration of motion to receive and file Master Plan for Cowan Heights Sewer System, Contract No. 7-19. v END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (11) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any -4- 07/26/95 (12) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Minutes of the Executive Committee (1) Receive and file draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on June 28, 1995. (2) Receive and file draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on July 5, 1995. (3) Receive and file draft Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization Study for Administrative Employees Minutes for the meeting held on July 6, 1995. (4) Receive and file draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on July 6, 1995. (5) Receive and file draft Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on July 12, 1995. (6) Receive and file draft Executive Committee Minutes for the meeting held on July 19, 1995. (b) Consideration of the following actions recommended by said committees: (1) OMT895-036 Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to enter into an Engineering Feasibility Studies Agreement with Southern California Edison "ENVEST° Program to study energy conservation measures at the Districts'treatment plants, for an amount not to exceed $30,000. (2) OMTS95-038 Consideration of the following actions relative to Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with Ernst &Young, providing for additional services for the development of documentation and training for conducting process improvement analysis of key programs within the Technical Services Department, as follows: (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file OMTS Committee certification of the final negotiated fee with Ernst & Young for said services. (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 95-79, approving Addendum No. 4 to said agreement with Ernst & Young for said additional services, for an additional amount not to exceed $20,000.00, increasing the total authorized compensation from an amount not to exceed $453,000.00 to an amount not to exceed $473,000.00. (3) PDC95-24 Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Pioneer-Standard Electronics for the Purchase of Two VAX 4000 Model 705A Computers for Plant No. 2 Plant Automation for the Ocean Outfall Booster Station (Specification No. E-257), in an amount not to exceed $357,266.95 plus tax. .5- [ITEM (12) CONTINUED ON PAGE 6] 07/26/95 (12) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 5) (b) (4) PDC95-25 Consideration of motion authorizing the Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization Study to solicit, negotiate, award and issue purchase orders to various vendors for Modifications to the Existing Interior Office Space in the Administration Building for General Management, Administration and Communications Offices, Specification No. E-256, in an amended amount not to exceed $130,000.00. (5) FAHR95-31 Consideration of Resolution No. 95-78, adopting Investment Performance Review Guidelines for the Districts' Investment Program. (6) FAHR95-32 Consideration of the following changes to the IRS-Approved Section 457 Deferred Compensation Plan: (a) Consideration of Resolution No. 95-80, approving amendment to Deferred Compensation Plan for Officers and Employees, providing for greater flexibility in plan distribution elections, clarify certain provisions of the Plan, and comply with certain recent Internal Revenue Service interpretations. (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 95-81, approving amended Deferred Compensation Program for Executive Management Group Employees and Management, Professional and Supervisory Employees. (7) FAHR95-34 Consideration of Resolution No. 95-82, approving Amendment No. 13 to Agreement for Employment of General Counsel. (8) EXEC95-01 Consideration of the following actions relative to Consolidation of the Districts: (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Report dated July 14, 1995, regarding consolidation of the nine separate districts. (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 95-83, approving consolidation of the nine separate districts into one single sanitation district; with a single board of directors made up of one representative each for every city, sanitary district, water district and unincorporated portion of the county within the sanitation districts' service area and now represented on one or more of the existing nine sanitation districts (c) Consideration of motion directing staff to initiate all steps necessary, including the LAFCO process, to complete a reorganization of the nine separate districts into one district. -6- [ITEM (12) CONTINUED ON PAGE 7) r 07/26/95 (12) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 6) (b) (9) EXEC95-03 Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to employ Judith Wilson at the top of the salary range for the position of Assistant General Manager-Administration. (10) EXEC95-04 Consideration of motion to receive and file the Finance Function Review- Final Report prepared by Ernst & Young. (13) ALL DISTRICTS Update by Staff and Consultants concerning developments related to the County's Commingled Investment Pool. (14) ALL DISTRICTS i i CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Boards,the Chair may convene the I Boards in closed session to consider matters of pending or potential litigation, or j personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9, 54957 or I 54957.6. 1 ' Reports relating to(a) purchase and sale of real property; (b)matters of 1 pending or potential litigation;(c)employment actions or negotiations with I employee representatives;or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act,may be reviewed by the Boards during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. Al such time as final actions are taken by the Boards on any of these subjects,the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. I (a) Convene in closed session, if necessary (b) Confer with Special Counsel R. Craig Scott &Associates re status of litigation, Louis Sangermano v. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. (c) Reconvene in regular session (d) Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session (15) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (16) ALL DISTRICTS Matters which a Director would like staff to report on at a subsequent meeting (17) ALL DISTRICTS Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff report -7- 07/26/95 (18) DISTRICT 1 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (19) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn (20) DISTRICT 2 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (21) DISTRICT2 Consideration of motion to adjourn (22) DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (23) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn (24) DISTRICT 5 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (25) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn (26) DISTRICT 6 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (27) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn (28) DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (29) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn (30) DISTRICT 11 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (31) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn (32) DISTRICT 13 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (33) DISTRICT 13 Consideration of motion to adjourn -8- 07/26/95 (34) DISTRICT 14 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (35) DISTRICT 14 Consideration of motion to adjourn NOTICE TO DIRECTORS: To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Joint j Boards, Directors shall submit items to the Board Secretary not later than the close of business 14 j days preceding the Joint Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on the agenda all items j submitted by Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and all formal communications. Board Secretary: Penny Kyle (714) 962-2411, ext. 2026 i Secretary: Patricia L. Jonk (714) 962-2411, ext. 2029 _9- J:1�WDOOaSAGBTDaM1F7SBSA.07 , II b COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA �,/ ......�+ P.O. BOX 0127,FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92728.8127 'I I7 p 108"ELLIS,FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708.7018 (714)OW2411 July 20, 1995 To the Chairman and Members of the Joint Boards of Directors Subject: Board Letter The following is an update on some of the things that are happening at the Districts. If you have questions on any of the items, please give me a call. Enchanter Boat Tour for Directors The first of the two boat tours on the Enchanter was held on July 13. The Directors who took advantage of this opportunity were very impressed with this operation. The second tour is scheduled for Friday, July 28. If there are any other Directors who are interested, we can scheduled another tour in August. I would like to encourage as many of you as can make it to take advantage of this opportunity. Please contact my office if you are interested and indicate which date is most convenient. Status Report on the Techite Pine Case The Techite Pipe trial ended, successfully, after more than eight weeks before the jury. On Wednesday, June 14, the jury awarded District 3 $147,500 in compensatory damages and $6,445,000 in punitive damages. We have been advised by Counsel that United Technologies will be requesting a new trial. Legislative Update Attached is a status report from CASA on current goings-on in Sacramento. Please note Item II, addressing proposals that would affect the Districts, including borrowing or transferring reserves. Board Agenda Mailings While we haven't received all of the questionnaires back regarding changes in mailing policies, it appears that the consensus is to eliminate the use of three-hole punched paper and send the entire agenda package only to active Directors, unless specifically requested by an alternate. As a result of this change, active Directors who cannot attend a meeting should be sure to give their packages to their alternate. + COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Chairman and Members of 1ORAA ELUS AVENGE the Joint Boards of Directors LEY.9A99,2] �] FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92]29�9+2] July 20, 1995 mar 982-2992zan Page 2 Continuing Investigation into the 1994 Fatal Accident at Plant No. 2 Attached is a copy of a letter from our special counsel on the accident at Plant 2, transmitting a letter from the Office of the District Attorney advising that they have concluded that insufficient evidence exists to sustain criminal charges. Staff will still be pursuing revisions to the state report. Request by Owner for Waiver of Connection Fee in District 2 On May 24, 1995, Mr. Jerome Greubel appeared before the Boards and requested demolition credit for a parcel on Chapman Avenue in the City of Orange. Under our ordinance, demolition credit may be applied towards our Capital Facilities Connection Charge if a new building is started within two (2) years of the demolition of the old building. Mr. Greubel requested this credit for the Chapman Avenue parcel. He stated that in 1990, the City of Orange condemned a portion of the parcel for the widening of Chapman Avenue. Mr. Greubel was not the owner of the parcel when the demolition or condemnation took place. According to title records, he purchased the property in the last two years. The City of Orange compensated the owner for the 1990 condemnation. In spite of several requests from staff, we have not received any information from Mr. Greubel to support the request. If and when we do, 4..' we will place an item on the District No. 2 agenda for consideration by the Board. Proposed Reduction In EPA's FY 1996 Budget As you may have read, the House Subcommittee on Appropriations for VA, HUD and Independent Agencies has proposed a 34 percent reduction in EPA's FY 1996 budget. The bill also contains a number of legislative "riders"that would curtail or, in some cases, eliminate EPA's ability to set standards and enforce regulations. As a result, EPA has initialed an immediate hiring and promotion freeze. Reductions of this magnitude in their opinion would have a major impact on EPA's ability to perform their responsibilities to protect public health and to ensure a clean and healthy environment. This may affect further consideration of our application for a continuance of our 301(h)waiver. OMITS Committee Tour of Plant No. 2 The OMTS Committee has scheduled a tour of Plant 2 on August 2, 1995, in lieu of the regular OMITS Committee meeting. All directors are invited to attend. Dinner will be served before the tour in Conference Room A of the Administration Building, and afterwards the Directors will board the Districts' bus for the 1-to 1-1/2-hour tour. When the tour ends, the bus will return the Directors to Plant 1. Please notify Clarice Marcin at 962-2411, extension 3001, no later than July 28 if you would like to attend. ' COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA Chairman and Members of 10 auS AVENUE v.o.eozein the Joint Boards of Directors F(oaTAIN VAu ,,MI NIA 92�e1e7 July20, 1995 mA)seeznr Page 3 Spill Containment Policy at Work Attached is a memo dated June 16, 1995 from Nick Arhontes that clearly identifies the need for a Spill Containment Policy. Staff is to be commended for their ability to work with others to develop a Spill Containment Policy. New Addition to General Counsel's Staff Attached is an announcement that Terry C. Andrus, former County counsel, has joined Rourke, Woodruff&Spradlin. Mr. Andrus will be developing the firm's personnel/labor relations practice. Staff Addresses Subcommittee of OC Division of League of California Cities On Friday, July 7, Blake Anderson and I addressed a Subcommittee on Service Delivery for the OC Division of the League of California Cities. We were requested to discuss how we are organized to deliver services; level of operations and governance. Revision to Travel Policies At the May 1995 Finance and Personnel Committee Meeting, the Directors reviewed and recommended changes in the wording of the Travel and Training Policy relative to costs incurred by retiring or terminating Directors and staff. The following paragraph was approved by the Committee: "Training and travel during the final 90 days of service of any Director or employee will be authorized only in extraordinary circumstances where no alternate attendee is appropriate. Absent such authorization, all costs will be reimbursed by the Director or employee.' Potential Soil Contamination at the Stor-N-Lok Facility adjacent to Plant No. 1 The storage facility at the comer of Garfield and Ward is leased from the Districts. The agreement is presently being revised providing for additional fees and an extension through 1997. Staff has indicated some concern about the possibility of contamination as a result of vehicle storage, potential for hazardous waste storage and heavy equipment repair which sometimes takes place on site by a sub-lessee. After an inspection of the site by our Source Control Inspector, it appears that the only observable waste on the site was spilled motor oil in small quantities at several locations. Status Update on the Security Services Contract The Request for Proposal (RFP) for the Security Services Control has been advertised and proposals will be opened on July 25. After staff evaluation the award will be presented to the 4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 41 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA Chairman and Members of the Joint Boards of Directors 10944 ELLI9 AVENUE July 20, 1995 v.o 9oA 0127 Page 4 FOUNTAIN VALLEY.fAUFOANIA 9272"127 g n141902-2u1 Directors at the August 23 Board Meeting. Our present security staff will remain onsite through September 15. Slater Avenue Pump Station Construction Project We have an ongoing construction project in the City of Huntington Beach which is Contract No. 11-17-1, Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements. This $5.7 million contract consists of constructing a new pump station, installing new sewage force mains and gravity sewer lines, and demolition of the old pump station. Several problems have been encountered thus far during construction, including delays to the work due to overly wet conditions during the winter, and running into many undisclosed underground utilities. One of the current impacts on the local residents will be driving piles for part of the building foundation. This is a noisy operation which can upset the nearby residents. We have met with the city staff of Huntington Beach in an effort to smooth out our impacts to the city residents. We are going to place larger information signs near the project, and will conduct neighborhood informational meetings to let the residents know the status of the job and to address any concerns of the residents. Budget Summary At the July 26 Board Meeting, a Budget Summary of the 1995-96 Budget will be available for all Directors. This summary will be given to each employee to explain changes in numbers, philosophy and employee involvement in controlling and lowering the cost of treatment. I am meeting with all employees in five separate meetings to discuss the budget and to commence what will be an ongoing dialogue about benchmarking and their role in cost containment. County Reorganization Much has been said about the need to restructure the County services delivery system. The League of California Cities—Orange County Division has a Super Committee working on this and the Board of Supervisors has appointed a special Charter Study Commission. As far as I know, only Supervisor Marian Bergeson has developed a specific proposal which she calls Orange County 2001. A copy is attached. Under this proposal, the County would be administered by a mayor elected for a four-year term. The governing board would be comprised of ten representatives from cities, four others and the mayor. The operating entity would be called the Orange Regional Services Authority (ORSA) and would provide services through four divisions: Health and Human Services Public Facilities Public Protection 4d Transportation All sanitation and water districts would be part of the Public Facilities Division. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS .1 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA EUU AVENUE Chairman and Members of 10P0 W.s127 v.o. n the Joint Boards of Directors FOUNTAIN vVALLEY.cnUzomna szozealzv July 20, 1995 n+nesz.zan Page 5 Orange County Financial Round Table Attached are two documents received at the Round Table I attended July 19 entitled The Orange County Bankruptcy Round Table and Financial and Legal Update. If you want additional information on any of the items I've addressed in this letter, or past letters, please give me or Jean a call at 714/962-2411. Respectfully, Donald F. McIntyre General Manager DFII J1 W G W OAMiDFMBONN.LTRb]1BY. Attachments `ark 07/19/95 17:56:01 -> 7199fiMS6 Donald Mclat,ye Page HHI JUL-19-95 WED 15:55 P.01 CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION of SANITATION AGENCIES � � 9tELanmr.Soi,e I400 6sv"nmm,OA 9be14 TSL'f93a1446e39a-FAR(9161448-06a9 w^' July 19, 1995 TO: CASA MEMBER AGENCIES FROM: Mike Dillon Bobbi Larson Christina Dillon SUBJECTS CAPrrOL UPDATE I. BUDGET NEGOTIATIONS CONTINUE... As you have probably been reading in the newspaper, the "Big Six" (Legislative leaders and the Governor) continue moeting to craft a state budget compromise. Legislative d employees, both members and staff, are going without pay until a budget is adopted. Insiders are predicting a budget solution by the end of July. A broad budget outline is emerging, though major sticking points remain, including welfare and education funding. The fiscal troubles of Los Angeles County are also being discussed,with proposals for am revenue sources ranging from additional "sin taxes" to authority to place a sales lax hike before the voters. At this point,special district property taxes do not appear to be part of the budget balancing act, but keep reading... H. THE SOLUTION TO COUNTY FUNDING WOES MAY INVOLVE BORROWING SPECIAL DISTRICT FUNDS Rumors abound regarding Icgisladvc efforts to tap special district reserves for loans to ailing counties. The key legislation so far is AR 16XX by Orange County AsseSnblymember Curt Pringle. In its current form. AB 16XX authorizes a county board of supervisors to borrow or transfer money from county enterprise fowls as long as doing so would not result in a fee increase. The bill originally applied only to Orange County,but was amended late last month to apply statewide. As now drafted, AB 16XX would not affect special district revenues. However, members of the Orange County delegation have discussed amending AR 16XX (or another bill) to allow loans of reserve funds from independent special districts to counties. Legislators frequently refer to the "bill1ems of dollars" in special district reserves as a source of funds to help counties; Orange County Supervisor Marian Bergeson has proposed a county takeover of Orange County Sanitation -> 71996ZB356 Donald tichd.9re page 802 D7/19/95 17:56:37 P.02 JUL-19-95 IiED 15:56 Districts and the Municipal Water District of Orange County in order to get aces to the $195 million and $50 million in reserves held by those agencies. Because their fiscal picture is so gloomy,counties are unable to sell bonds and need another means of borrowing. Details of a legislative proposal are sketchy-, one Assembly staffer indicated that the bill would be permissive, requiring both the district and the county to agree to the loan and allow 10 years for repayment However, there is always the possibility that the big will authorize the county to borrow the funds without the consent of the special districts and that the bill will apply statewide, not just to Orange County. The coasenam around the capitol is that the legislature will not focus on solving the Orange County problem until after the state budget is passed. It may be a few weeks before actual language surfaces. Speaker Doris Allen recently assumed the Chairmanship of the Select Committee on the Insolvency of Orange County, replacing Los Angeles Democrat Marguerite Archie-Hudson_ The Committee had been scheduled to review various Orange County-related legislative proposals at a special hearing July 27, 1995. It now appears that the hearing may be moved into August. We will continue to investigate all proposals affecting special district property taxes and reserves and report developments to you as thcy occur. .irv�ne fort ACc u,xS PAV&C,L POWON. MOOA.liEAD �•� *� n � �,~'��^ tn GOE'Ptm& Lawyer& M. Pohleon (Tl4)58&12 �; A)C 4 Moodmd rA (714) %B-7271 70 Thomas M CactLsle July 5, 1995 Orange County Sanitation District P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-6127 ATTENTION: Blake Anderson General Manager RE: 2/1/94 Industrial Accident Dear Mr. Anderson: Enclosed please find a copy of the correspondence I have just received from the Deputy District Attorney who has been directing the criminal investigation of the above-referenced accident. As you can see, this confirms that the criminal investigation has at long last been closed with no charges filed. I therefore also enclose what should be my final billing statement in this matter. Thank you for the opportunity to be of service. Congratulations on the successful resolution of this aspect of this tragic accident. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Very truly yours, PORLSON, MOORHEAD 6 GOETR7 TR�S ETRAL /dj Enclosure cc: Teri Josway (Via FAX to (714) 962-0427) Thomas Nixon, Esquire 23151 Moulton Parkway. 8uitc 102 . Laguna Hills, CA 92653 OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY 1 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 0FMICHAEL R. CAPIZZI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY MAURICE L EVANS L7u1V 5 , 1995 CHIEF ASSISTANT JDNN D.CONLEY _ O PROTON NAJCROFFENSUS Mr. Thomas M Goethals JAN J.NOLAN Pohlson, Moorhead & Goethals DIRECTOR 23151 Moulton Parkway SUPERIOR COURT Suite 102 BRBJRF.ROMNEv Laguna Hills, CA 92633 DIRECTOR MUNICIPµ CD'JPT WALLACE J.WADE DIRECTOR SPECIAL opnATIONB Re: Orange County $anitation Di rig LGRBNW.DSCHBSNE CHIP BUREAU OF INVESTIOATION Dear Mr. Goethalsl PLEASE RlFLYTO: ..,,// We have completed our investigation into the fire and LCCENTRAL OFFICE deaths at the Sanitation District' s Huntington Beach ra PC eo amN,eR DRw facility on February 1, 1994. Based on our review, we SWTA ANA.CA 9=1 have concluded that insufficient evidence exists to p1AI1]4aeM sustain criminal charges related to this tragic n NOM OFFICE incident. our inquiry is now closed. 181E N.80415 Ave. FU[URTON.CA 9]e]1 t)+•t mr41B I assume you will notify interested parties at the District of our conclusions . If you have questions WNSTOF.lee regarding any aspect of this case, please do not e+4naTe sTR[eC WES-1 WBTlP. hesitate to contact me..CA Se01] R'•'e06-A1 1 SOUTH OFFICE 11141CRGWNYALLSv PNWv. $//1nC//2(y/:2�/1�'`f� .p '—I IAOUVAN.DUIL CA P3ET •r,' "S AIAN 1211 GU NARSOP OFFICE 401 JAMBOREE SLVO. MAITHBW ANDERSON NEWPORT BEACH CA 9188E R1414) 4990 Deputy District Attorney Special Assignments Section C JUVaJ'Le OFFICE (714) 334-3824 241 CRY DRIVE BDUTA ORANGE,CA eem (71419EE'TD84 C MAJOA FRAUD CONSUMER PROTECTION 408 W.BTH R)RBBT SURBEM SANTA ANA.CA w701 171A19941100 l ' COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS j 01 ORANGE COUNTY,CAIRORNIA June 16, 1995 IO EWSAVENUE P.O.BOX 5121 FOUMAIN VALLEY,CA JFORNIA W2"127 r/14ISB&2 II MEMORANDUM TO: Edwin E. Hodges FROM: Nicholas J. Arhontes SUBJECT: Sewage Spill of June 6, 1995 Spoon's Restaurant Site - City of Tustin Due to our continuing efforts in spill containment and anticipating our proposed new policy (OMTS95-029), I decided to visit the site, assist Division 3340 as much as possible and critique the event. I arrived on the scene at Newport Boulevard and sixth street at approximately 6:20 p.m. Robert Burge of Division 3340 was the standby person on the site. Robert had established a containment barrier using absorbent booms and dirt from an adjacent shrub area on Newport Blvd. At approximately 6:00 p.m., Tustin Police Department (Officer Vallevieni, #661) had contacted the private property owner, The Carlson Company, advising them of the spill and requesting their on-site assistance. Ms. Bobbie Frazier of The Carlson Co. arrived at 6:25 p.m. I showed Ms. Frazier the overflowing manhole in the driveway to the Restaurant/Business Complex. The overflow was a one-inch high stream coming from a 3/4 inch diameter pick hole. She advised that they did have a P.M. routine for the property and requested their plumbing contractor to show up. The plumber never arrived. An additional standby person was requested on the radio to bring the Combination Truck for vacuuming up the sewage. John Gonzalez advised Control that it was not available, as it was in the Auto Shop for scheduled maintenance. Control then contacted National Plant Services who had a Combination Truck. We requested Nottingham, since all we needed was a Vacuum Pumper Truck, but Control had no phone numbers on their list. Nottingham had done an excellent job for us in Seal Beach recently. I will be fixing this for the next time. National Plant's ETA was about one hour out of Long Beach. John Gonzalez was advised to bring the Hydroflusher and try to find some portable pumping equipment so we could pump off the contained sewage to a nearby manhole. Our containment was approaching full. Ms. Karen News, Orange County Public Health, arrived, surveyed the scene, our containment, and then focused on requesting the restaurant operators to stop serving r food and to notify tenants of the problem and the possibility of shutting off the water supply. Ms. Frazier had sewer system drawings in her office, but not with her. She did advise that the complex was basically divided in thirds and that two additional laterals drained the other areas. She also advised that the restaurant had a "Grease Trap" on site. We did not see any signs unless it was interior to the building. We also did not have any information on the private laterals and how they tie into the City's system. As you are aware, we maintain the City's system under a contract, but not the laterals. Adjacent to our containment area was an OCSD 24-inch cover. We decided that to protect our containment from an overflow, we could use a five-gallon pail and bucket off a few gallons at a time and dump it into the sewer. Traffic control was adjusted and the cover was removed. A visual inspection showed a dry line and an approximately 24- inch diameter pipe leading to the storm drain inlet box our containment was protecting. Apparently someone on the City staff had allowed some contractor to switch OCSD covers with storm drain covers on a street paving job or we have a direct connection to the sewer system. We decided bucketing sewage to the storm drain was a bad idea. Shortly after 7:00 p.m., John Gonzalez arrived with the Hydroflusher and began filling the holding tank. Still, no sign of the contract plumber. Trouble shooting sewer systems in the field without drawings is difficult, especially under heavy traffic conditions. At about 7:10 p.m., we opened a manhole.on Newport and San Juan and found it to be a turn point routing local flow easterly on San Juan. Visible was a channel with very little flow from the direction of the overflowing manhole. The flusher hose was sent up the lateral where it broke through a heavy blockage. Heavy grease and gritty/sludgy debris was visible. The overflow stopped and normal conditions were reestablished. I requested that the crew continue to flush the private system up to the clean-out riser adjacent to the building (Spoons). If there was a grease trap, it appeared to be nonfunctional and if there was a maintenance program by the property owner it missed this connection to the City-owned system. Ms. Newe of Orange County Public Health was informed of our activities and findings, and began to notify the various tenants of the resolution of the problem. We advised her that restaurant grease is becoming a major cause of blockages. At about 7:35 p.m., National Plant Services arrived with their Combination Truck and a two-man crew. They setup within our traffic control at the containment area and began vacuuming up the sewage. Our crew performed a wash down of the private manhole, clean-out riser and surface area around the manhole. These activities were witnessed by Spoons' staff and David Grimaldo of Preferred Property Maintenance. The gutter was then washed down using the street flusher feature of our Hydro Flusher. The absorbent booms were squeezed out and hauled back to the plant and eventually disposed of in the rag bin. All of the rinse waters were contained and vacuumed up. The last step of the clean up was the vacuuming up of the dirt and mud used for the containment, then a small rinse of the containment zone. National Plant completed its 2of3 work about 8:25 p.m. Our staff escorted them to a nearby trunk manhole to discharge U their liquids and silt. Polaroid photos were taken and are available for review. I found Division 3340's spill response to be more than adequate considering obstacles they faced and our current containment strategy to be effective. Areas for improvement: 1. We could utilize small portable trash pumps for containment pump-off back to the local sewer. 2. Area maps of the City of Tustin are inadequate. We don't even have the City's construction drawings on site. 3. We should back charge the property owners for the response effort for discharging grease to the sewer. Costs were allocated to 00708-0-00, including my time. 4. Local cities should have sewer plans available for private business/industrial complexes for troubleshooting purposes. I believe they all have access to structure drawings for fire fighting purposes. 5. Additional training and materials for Division 3340's staff on containment strategies and continuous training. 6. Continuous review and update of our emergency contractor/service firm list(s). 7. Cellular phones for field use to improve communications between the Control Center staff, suppliers and field crews and not impact the Plant radio system. 8. Workshops with the member cities and agencies to identify roles and responsibilities in SSO (Sanitary Sewer Overflow) events. 9. Outreach by Source Control/Compliance to the restaurant industry on SSO issues. NJA:cm RiWPOOLlW1WJJ pill&K c: B. Anderson K Ramey (3340) M. McCusker "' 3of3 LAW OFFICES OF ROIIRBEF WOODRUFF & SPRADLIN Rr e. Dlxx,xo .nwermnioNnl—PORwmN MU PHONE la,al 558-1000 M. LO,S BORAX SUITE 7000 PAGR.MILL 11I41 BObTpBT /COAX e. C n o. vARnlxARRIM oTOiox 701 SOUTH PARKER STREET PRE.R. O ORANGE, CALIFORNIA 0256B JOSEPH W. F AT X .1... Fvner WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL NUMBER PETTY C. NUMBERT... 1CN F.. .1... JAMES W. PARKER JANES O. ROURXE JONx R. RN.w July 6, 1995 KENKARD R. SMART. JR. .... DANIEL K. SPRA04w M R. wA1. TNOMAS L. WOODRUFF Rourke, Woodruff& Spradlin is pleased to announce that Terry C. Andrus, former County Counsel for the County of Orange, will be joining our firm. Mr. Andrus is currently on a brief holiday and will join Rourke, Woodruff& Spradlin approximately July 18. Mr. Andrus is a highly respected public law attorney with broad and deep experience in both litigation and advisory matters. During the 21 years he served in the County Counsel's office, including four years as the County Counsel, he has dealt with virtually every element of public law. We anticipate that Mr. Andrus will focus on developing the firm's personnel/labor relations practice. y� Terry Andrus leaves his position as County Counsel with the uniform praise of the members of the Board of Supervisors, the County Chief Executive Officer, leaders of the employee unions and interested observers of county government. This is a remarkable testimony to both his skill in dealing with specific problems raised by the County's financial crisis and the broad scope of his exemplary skills as an attorney. His reputation for integrity and ethics is the highest. We are proud of the quality of our practice and we believe Mr. Andrus will prove to be a real plus in serving our clients. ROURKE, WOODRUFF & SPRADLIN ORANGE COUNTY 2001 by Supervisor Marian Bergeson Orange County 2001 is a proposal that would change the way regional services are delivered and programs administered throughout Orange County. In short, it looks at the current limitations on counties and tries to respond by putting in place an accountable manager who would be responsible for the delivery of regional services. Because of its complexity, it is a long-term approach to restructuring local government in urban Orange County that will require both legislative and voter approval. While it identifies cost savings associated with such changes, it recognizes that shifts in responsibility involve shifts in funding, too—so savings in one area may mean transferring costs to another. Introduction Of California's 58 counties,perhaps none are quite like Orange. As the state's largest"general law" Orange County is highly urbanized,with less than 10%of its territory unincorporated. Further,it has no dominant city--either politically or by population. The cities of Santa Ana (population 308,000),Anaheim(population 285,000),and Huntington Beach(population 186,000) are its three largest—but they are but three of 31 cities within the county. Less than 7%of the county's residents live in unincorporated areas--the largest of these areas are Aliso Viejo (population 15,000),North Tustin(population 25,000)and the Rancho Santa Margarita-Foothill Ranch area(population 30,000). As mandated by the California Constitution(Article XI, Section 1b),the County of Orange is governed by a 5-member Board of Supervisors. Each Board member is elected by district for a four-year tens of office. In the past,the Board has vacillated between operating with a"strong" county administrative officer(CAO)to whom all non-elected department heads report and a system with a weaker CAO that attempts to Implement the Board's policies. Responding to the mixed sense of authority and questions about"who was in charge"that contributed to its bankruptcy,the County recently created the position of County Executive Officer(CEO). The Orange County Board has given the CEO broad authority to run county operations without, in many cases, direct Board consent. As a creation of state government,the County of Orange administers several prognems on behalf of the State of California. These programs include social services, health care for the indigent, and court operations. Because much of the countys programs involve both state and federal funds(along with the level-of-service mandates associated with those funds),a significant percentage of the county's budget Is non-discretionary. In fact,the Board of Supervisors has direct control over only about 8%of the funds within the County family of funds(an amount equal to about 15%of the General Fund). In May 1995,the County identified more than 300 separate state and federal mandates that restrict Its operations or require that it provide a certain level of service.With growing trends towards incorporation of the remaining unincorporated territory,the County of Orange rapidly finds itself becoming a deliverer of services with little or no discretion over which services are provided to what population. Orange County 2001 June 1,1995 Page 2 Summary of Proposal In light of state and federal mandates and the restrictions on Its operations, many argue that the County of Orange no longer requires active decision-making bodies governing its operations. The boards of supervisors who once served as"land barons"and planners of the unincorporated area have a completely new focus in urban counties--so much so that supervisors' backgrounds may not be suitable for today's needs. Urban counties today require the guidance of people who have a particular expertise in service delivery and management. An urban county in 1995 needs good managers, not good legislators. Responding to a slow elimination of supervisors'traditional role as land use planners governing large areas of unincorporated territory,this proposal: •Eliminates the Board of Supervisors and replaces it with a single elected'COUNTY MAYOR'who would manage the cost-effective delivery of regional services throughout the geographic county. As proposed,voters would elect a county mayor who held specific minimum qualifications for office outlined in the county's charter. Such qualifications may Include a Moslem Degree from an accredited university or college in Business Administration or Public Administration and several years experience managing a large scale private firm or governmental entity. • Establishes the ORANGE REGIONAL SERVICES AUTHORITY(ORSA)and ORSA's goveming board to advise and assist the elected County Mayor In providing services. The ORSA governing board would meet bi-monthly or monthly(as does a corporate Board of Directors)and be appointed by designated groups throughout the area. Such groups shall include tan representatives from the Orange County Division of the League of California Cities,one each from four specific community groups or organizations(such as United Way, the Health Care Council,and the Grand Jurom AssoclaUon). The elected county mayor shall �J chair the governing board and serve as Its 151h voting member. Eleven votes of the board shall override or veto a decision of the elected county mayor. •Directs the Mayor shall operate four administrative DIVISIONS under ORSA,Including Health and Human Services,Public Facilities, Public Protection,and Transportation. •Provides that CITIES take over at least four functions once performed by the County of Orange,including law enforcement and police services(non-Jell functions), local planning and land use, low-and moderate-income housing,and library administration. •Provides that ORSA contract with the STATE OF CALIFORNIA to perform the functions of Elections and Voter Registration,local agency treasury and Investment(via the State Treasurers Local Agency Investment Fund),the role of the Department of Education(a non- county entity under current law),the administration of property taxes,and the court and marshal operations. The following page shows an organization chart which outlines Orange County 2001. �rang.16 county 2001 - I. - Oran e.Clwn ;Cities _' Cohn-YMOO '�. gtateafCallforni+.�: 4-year elective term of office Aliso Viejo Anaheim Chairs ORSA Board Former County Operations Brea Buena Park I Elections and Registration Costa Mesa Cypress Orange'Re lobo seeviceij Authority Treasury and Investment Dana Point Foothill Ranch Governing Board Department of Education Fountain Valley Fullerton 15 Thal—to City,4 other,I Mayor Property Tax Administration Garden Grove Huntington Beach Advises Mayor,Vetoes with I I Votes Courts&Marshal Irvine Laguna Beach Laguna Hills Laguna Niguel f!GRBAOperActrip La I Ii bra take Forest Division of Health and Human services Notes: La Palma Los Alamitos Health Care(OPTIMA) 1.Structure will require Constitutional Amendment Mission Viejo Newport Beach Sncial Services relating to the elected officers of a county Orange Placentia (Article XI.Section I IbB Rancho Santa Marg San Clemente Division of Public Facilities San Juan Capistrano Santa Ana Flood Control I.Structure will require legislation relating Seal Beach Stanton parks and Recreation In the cessation of county powers,the Tustin Villa Park Sanitation and Waste Management modification of OCTA,and the consolidation of Westminster Yorba Linda Water all non-school special purpose districts. F er County Operations Division of Public Prolection Police Services Coroner nning and land Use District Attomey/Public Defender Ilousing Fire and Emergency Management N Libraries ]ail Administration(Sheriff/Warden) c m cg 3: Prnbatinn ce �m jT Division al Transportation o a Airport Roads and Freeways Transit Orange County 2001 June 1,1995 Page 4 The Underlying Assumptions The Orange County 2001 proposal is based upon the following assumptions about urban counties in general and about the County of Orange in particular. •Urban supervisors'days of LAND BARONS and as governors of the unincorporated area are long gone. •Those areas of urban counties that are not now INCORPORATED should become so(or become ANNEXED to existing cities). •Urban county government has become urban area SERVICE DELIVERY. •There remain specific;services that should be provided on a REGIONAL basis. •Some of these regional services are currently provided by SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICTS which can and should be CONSOLIDATED to achieve greater economies of scale. •Other programs can best be provided locally(by CITIES)or statewide. •No matter the entity that operates the programs or services. FUNDING should follow PROGRAMS. •Good MANAGERS, and not necessarily good legislators,can most effectively deliver regional services. Proposal Detail As noted above,this proposal makes several structural changes in the way the County of Orange operates in 1995. To accomplish these structural changes,the proposal assumes that the revenue associated with the changes would follow the programs to be shifted. The following descriptions of the proposed changes outlines OC 2001's suggested program eliminations, administrative functions,program divisions, programs transferred to cities,and the programs contracted with the state. The outline includes,where available,estimated costs or savings associated with each switch: 1. Program Eliminations a Board of supervisors. The Change County Board of Supervisors IS posleons)and Its staff(29 positions) would be eliminated.will a cost Savings of approximately$1.9 million annually. Any staffing requlreme b;of, the ORSA governing board would be tome by Me County Mayors office under Me OC 2001 proposal. The ORSA board Itself would serve W Ihoul pay and without stipend. This elimination requires an amendment to Artlde XI,Section 1(b)of the Califamla Constitution. TOTALAPPROPRMTIONS =SIMMN NETORSACOST .= 0 MN TOTALPOSmONS = 30 POSITION REDUCTIONS . 34 NETCOSTSAVINGS - $1.113MN •Clerk of the Board. With the Board's position eliminated.the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors and Its staff would be eliminated W well. The CAB'S duties,from filing notices of meetings and clerking assessment appeals,would be reduced significantly and absorbed by the County Mayors Office(meeting duties)and Me State of Coldomla (assessment appeals). TOTALAPPROPRMTIONS =SI.TMN NETORSACOST •P 0 MN TOTAL POSITIONS • n POSTIWN REDUCTIONS . b NET COST SAVINGS • S1.71WN ` / Orange County 2001 June 1,1995 Page 5 �..: •Advocacy&Legislation. Any contact with aimed officials In Washington or Sacramento would be done In house within Die County Mayors Office or wah members of Me ORSA board Of directors. iOTALAPPROPRIATIONS =$OS MN NETORSACOST .$ a MN TOTALPOSmONS . 0 POSITION REDUCTIONS . 0 NETCOSTSAVINGS . 1105MN •Loral Agency Formation Commission(LAFCO} LAFCO,a 100%County-funded body that administers proposals for Me corew0tlaaon or dissolution of special denote and for the annexation or incorporation of unincorporated areas,would become an Independent entity that relies entirely on fee-far-service payment to meet it budget obligations. TOTALAPPROPRIATIONS .$O MN NET ORSA COST .$O MN TOTAL POMONS . 0 POSITION REDUCTIONS . ♦ NETCOSTSAVINOS . S30S.000 IL ORSA Adminishatfve Operations •ORSA Administrative ONlco. The ORSA administrative office would provide stuff support and enelyes b the County Mayor and m the ORSA Board of Governors. OC 2001 assumes that the'OAV would develop ORSA's budget,new program guidelines,and monitor performance of division and department operations. OC 2001 proposed meinhuning no OAO at the same level now staffed In Orange Couny's CAO. TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS .If U MN NST ORSA COST .S z.1 MN TOTAL POSITIONS . al POSITION REDUCTONS . 0 NETCOSTSAVINGS . SOMN �� •ORSA Auditor. The ORSA aud'Nng function would be contracted out on a two-or three-year bast with a private sector fine.OC 2001 proposes a 50%savings from current year expenditures with this contract,due both to the reduction in the size of the entity audited and the competitive bid process associated with the contract. TOTALAPPROPRIAMONS .52A1VIN NET ORSA COST .SUMN TOTALPOsmn . 0 POSITION REDUCTIONS . 371 NETCOSTSAVINGS . SUMN •ORSA Counsel. As legal advisors to the County and to the Boars Of Supervisors,the County Counsel is an appomhos omee. OC 2001 proposes contracting out Counsel's function with a private sector firm Mat would represent the more limited legal needs of ORSA. It proposes a 50%savings Dom current year expenditures with this contrast,due both to the reduction In the size of the entity represented and the compatillve bid process associated with the contract. TOTALAPPROPRIATIONS .$1.7MN NET OR"COST .$ 1.7MN TOTALPOSmOM . 0 POSITION REDUCTIONS . BT NETCOSTSAVWGS . SI.T MN •ORSA Date Systems. The function Mat operates and maintains ORSA's compmer nelwoms would be contracted out to a private sector fine Mat specializes in management informaaun systems(MIS). OC 2001 proposes a 50% savings from cuff ant year expenditures YAM this contract,due both to the reduction In the size of ORSA and me competitive bid process associated with the contact. TOTALAPPROPRIATIONS .$4SMN NET OR"COST .SaSMN TOTALPOSmOM . 0 POSITION REDUCTIONS = IN NETCOSTSAVINGS . Sa.5MN Orange County 2001 June 1,1995 Page 6 •ORSA Facilities Operation.. The function that operates and maintains ORSRs facility leases would be contramad out to a private Sector firm net speciallzas In property management. CC 20DI proposes a 50%Savings Imm current year momentums with this contrast,due both to the reduction in Me size of ORSA and the competitive bid process associated with Me contract. TOTALAPMOPRIATIONS .$4AMN NET ORSA COST .SaAMN TOTAL POSmONS . 0 POSITION REDUCTIONS a N NETCOSTSAVINOS . $a.0 MN Ill. ORSA Program Divisions Division of Health and Human Service. •Health Cam. Those functions already performed by the Health Care Agency(mast mandated by 9Mm and federal law)would confinue witthout significant change from the currant county"am. Orange County 20DI places this function under ORSA's Division of Health and Human Services. TOTALAPPROPRIATIONS .SMA MN NETORSACOST .S 2111 MN TOTAL POSITIONS .222/ POSITION REDUCTIONS .0 NETCOSTSAVINGS .0 •Social Services. Those functional already performed by the Social Services Agency like Child Welfare Services, Adult Services,Employment Education and Training,and Finenclel Assistance(mast mandated by State law)would continue under ORSA's Division of Health and Human SerNces. TOTALAPPROPRIATIONS .SINA MN NETORSACOST .S 10IIMN TOTALPOSRtONS .2573 POSGIONREOUCTiONS .0 NETCOSTSAVING9 . 0 l , •Community Services. Those functions already performed by the Community Services Agency,like the Area Agency on Aging,veterans Services,and local Implementatan of the Job Training Partnershlp Act(JTPA)would contnue as programs funded only by state or federal contributions. TOTA."PROPRIATIONS .S163 MN NETORSACOST .S 0 MN TOTALPOSmONS .10 POSITION REDUCTIONS .12 NETCOSTSAVINGS . Sa AOS Division of Public Facilities •flood Control. In Me currant structure,the Environmental Management Agency(EMA)administers the Orange County Flood Control District under Me directan of Me Board of SupeMsors. CC 2001 placed this function under ORSA and the County Mayor. 95%of Flood's funding comes from Sources other than the General Fund. TOTALAPPROPRIATIONS .SWUMN NETORSACOST .$ 11.1 MN TOTAL POSRN)NS . Not Available POSITION REDUCTIONS . NPl Avehable NET COST SAVINGS . SUMN Orange County 2001 June1,1995 Page 7 �•"� •Parke and Reereation. In the current structure,EMA's Harbore,Beaches,and Parks division acquires,develops, operates,and manages the area's harbors,beaches,perks and historic sites. HBBP contacts with Me private sector o provide maintenance services and to operate specific leases at Featherly Perk and Dena Point Harbor. CC 2001 assumes continued regional operations of perks and open space,bud the management of specific saes Mat are closely tied to cities could be shifted o those cities. State tidelands revenue,property taxes,and non- general fund sources make up 80%of HB$P'S budget TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS .Sn2MN NIT ORSA COST =$154 AN TOTALPOSITIONS . Not Available POSITION REDUCTIONS . Not Avalable NET COST SAVINGS . $ OMN •SanlreUon and Waste Management The Orange County Sanitation Districts(OCSan)and several other Independent Schouten districts and water districts administer the area's sewage treatment and collection systems. OC 2001 would consolidate these Separate chance;into a single department within the Division of Public Facilities— the deperbnent court be competitively,bra to OCSan or a private finn(as Is done by Me City of Indianapolis).The Waste Management function of this department would also be put to bid,with Me current Integrated Waste Management Department(IWMD)expected to compete for the area's hareoous waste collection program and three area tandfills. Sanitary disMuts hold$185 MN in reserves In FY 1994-95,with S29 MN In salary/benefit and directors'expenses. They collected$79 MN In user lees and$3.2 MN In property Was OC 2001 Sentence Met these expanses could be reduced by 40%(similar to that which occurred In Indianapolis)and estimates a$48 MN savings with consolidation. TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS .SWMN NET ORSA COST .$ 0 MN TOTALPOSRIONS . Not Avallable POSITION REDUCTIONS . Not Available NET COST SAVINGS . $M MN •Water. When Orange County residents get their water,It has gone through a relatively complex maze of government entitles. Groundwater Is administered by the Orange County Wader Dis ict Imported water comes born the Metropolitan Water District(Met)and as Orange County affiliate,the Municipal Water Dismct of Orange �a►/ County(MWDOC). DOWD,Mat,and other wholesale dieblcb sell their water l0 one of Orange County's 17.retail water districts. These disticts can sell the water to other districts or$01)It directly to residents. OC 2001 envisions a single water department administered by the County Mayor and ORSA that would both administer groundwater and Imparted water from Mad. Districts held more than S50 MN In reserves In FT 1991 They ccltected$120 MN In bees end$15 MN in property taxes during the same period. DC 2001 assumes a 45%cut(similar to that of Me County of Orange)In salary/benefit and directors'lee expenses in estimating a$22 MN Savings with consolidation. TOTALAPPROPRMGONS .S108 MN NET Ones COST .$ SUN TOTAL POSITIONS . Not Available PO9MN REDUCTIONS . Not Avalable NET COST SAVINGS . $ 02MN Division of Public Protection •Coroner. This function of Me Sheriff-Coroners office would continue at current levels. The coroner is mandated under stale Isw to(1)transport bodies to an autopsy area,(2)conduct n0umpathology,exams on State Hospital deaths,(3)Investigate sudden and unexplalned deaths,(4)provide dental charts on unidentified bodies,(5)report to the CHP on traffic deaths,and(6)to perform autopsies to determine medical causes of death. TOTALAPPROPRIATONS . Not Available NETORSACOST . Not Avallabb TOTAL POSITIONS . Not Av.WM. POSITION REDUCTIONS . Not Avalable NETCOSTSAVINGS . Not AV.1". •District Attorney. The Orange County District Attorney would remain an elective office and in charge of criminal Investigations,advising Me Grand Jury,and enforcing family support obligations(or me area. OC 2001 would place the DNS budget controls with Me County Mayor. TITALAPPROPAMTIONS .$S4.7 MN NET ORSA COST .$ 4.511IN TOTALPOSITIONS = Me POSITRONREDUCTONS = Nora ��,/ NET COST SAVINGS $OMN Orange County 2001 June 1,1995 Page 8 •Fire and Emergency Management. The Orange County Fire Authority,a joint powers agreement between the Vd County and 18 dues that Contract with tte Authority for fire sar ces,would effectively continue In a similar role under Me Division of Public Protection under Orange County 2001. Its Director of Fire Services would report to the County Mayor. The Emergency Management function,having been moved from the County Administrative Office to the Sheriffs Department,would be administered by Me Director of Fro Son loan. TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS . Vino MN NET ORSA COST . Not AVMMble TOTAL POSOONS . IN POSITION REDUCTIONS . No. NET COST SAVINGS . SOMN •Indigent Datums. The Orange County Public Defenders office would remaln In charge of defending Mow who ere unable to Pay for legal services associated Wth criminal Indictments. TOTALAPPROPRIATIONS .a za2 MN NET OR9A COST .a=MN TOTAL POSITIONS . al POSITION REDUCTIONS . Na. NET COST SAVINGS . SOMN •Jail Administration. Under Orange County 2001,ORSA Could choose to mountain existing]all adminlanaton or to privatize the area's five]ells,Including Theo Lacy in Orange,James Musick in Irvine,and Me Mein Women's and Men's]all.and Me make and Refers,Center(IRC)In Sane Ana. TOTALAPPROPRMTIONS . Not Avellabre NETONSACOST . Not Avelubfe TOTALPOSITIONS . Not Awdleble POSITION REDUCTIONS . Norc NETCOSTSAVINGS . SOMN •Probation. The Probation Department would Continue to Con Me area's juvenile justice operations,including juvenile court services,juvenile field supervision.juvenfle atematives,and juvenile lmfttare. It would also Continue Its adult operations,including adult Court Services,adult field supervision,and adult alternatives. �a.✓ TOTALAPPROPRMTIONS . S6r.t MN NETORSACOST . $MAMN TorALPOSmm . Iwo POSITION REDUCTIONS . None NET COST SAVINGS . SOMN •Agricultural CommiealonerlWelghts and Measures. Under Orange County 2001,ORSA could choose to contact for Moss services mandated by state law relating to Me vertical of local welght5 and measures and the services of a local agricultural commissioner. OC 2OD1 assumes a 100%reduction In Tet County war Wth ITS Contract,as any operations would be feaforservice. TOTALAPPROPMATIONS . SOMN NETORSACOST . SOMN TOTAL POSITIONS . 34 POSITIONREDUCTIONS . O4 NETCOSTSAVINGS . a4TS,000 Division of Transportation •Airport. John Wayne Abperl s administration would Continue as an ORSA-administered department under the Orange County 2001 plan. Federal Avlation Administration regulations and existing bond covenants limit JWA's prlveMaton opportunities. JWXs funding would Continue from enterprise revenue. TOTALAPPROPIVATIONS . 34UMN NETOIISACCST . 3 0 MN TOTAL POSITIONS . IN POSITION REDUCTIONS . None NET COST SAVINGS . f OMN a Orange County 2001 June 1,1995 Page 9 \�/ •Floods and Freeways. The operations of the Orange County Tre pombon Authority(OCTA),with a goveming board Mat oomhlnes city what County representation,would be brought under the umbrella of ORSA. All revenue from Measure M and from the 1/6-oent existing sales tax contribution to local roads would continue towards the Roads and Freeways department within ORSA. TOTALAPPROPRIATIONS = Not Avelleble NETORSACOST - Not Available TOTALPOSIT m = Not Avelleble POSMN REDUCTIONS - Not Avelleble NETCOSTSAVINGS - Nut Avelleble •Transit Like the above department,ORSA's new Transit department would operate Me area's mess transit system. OC 2001 envisions Mat MIs function would be put up for competitive bid to allow private-sector 6mis to compete for Me least Mouth contract. Gas tax and Measure M revenues would fund this departments operations. TOTALAPPROPRMTIONS - Not Avallable NET ORSA COST • Not Avelleble TOf nsmom • Not Avelleble POSITION REDUCTIONS = Net Available NET COST SAVINGS = Not Available IV. Programs Shifted to Cities •law,Enioreement/Police Services. Orange County has both cites that operate Meir own police forces and cities Mat contract with either Me Sheriff or with other aides. Under OC 2001,orders could continue to have this type of flexibility War other cities or with an ORSA-affiliated law enforcement agency. Should citieschaost to contreci for police services with a regional law enforcement entity.the overall administrative and management decisions for that entity would be under Me authority of the County Mayor. Savings from MIs change would be Me elimination of any contribution from Me general purpose revenue of the County-in other words,law enforcement would be administered solely with Proposition 172 revenue and contract city fes-forsorvice payments. TOTAL SAVINGS = $155 MN �� •Planning and Land Use. With no unincorporated population,aides would absorb all local planning functions cunenfly performed by the Planning Section of via Environmental Management Agency. At the same time,cites would designate and fund an area-wide Metropolitan Planning Organization(MPO)that would administer regional Issues like air quality,transportation(anti the Master Plan of Anginal Highways),and fair share housing allbeebons. TOTAL SAVINGS = Solari •Affordable Housing. OC 2001 proposes that the state and federal dollars that are recalved by the Housing and Community Development division witnin EMA and the operations of Me Orange County Housing Authority bt. transferred completely fo dtles. Under current law,each city is abligated to meet its pardon Of the slate's fair share housing allocations-OC 2001 assumes Mat each city has the ability to implement Me"allocations. The dollars below reflect federal appropriations Mat would go to cites. TOTAL APPROPINATIONS =5215 MN •Libraries. The 26 public Swedes that are run from Me County system would be transferred to the cities In which they operate. Cities would elan recelve the revenue associated with those Operations($20,059.000)-a sum Mat comes primarily from property tax revenue. Cities would be encouraged to join together wit,neighboring cures and with local school disMcis to support a localized library system Mat would allow foe-based access for Mesa Orange County residents who may not live within the immedlate service area of the library. The amount below reflects property tax revenue associated with library services that would the shifted to cities: TOTALAPPROPRWTIONS =4114.5 MN V. Programs Contracted with the State of California •Eleetlons and Registration. The California Secretary of Staib'e Office would assume responsibility for the area's voter registration rolls and for conducting elections. With growing computerization of the registration rolls,this will become an operation that may be far more cost creative w the slate level. Under Me current system,Orange County citizens ce,register Win the Secretary of State Or with Me least Repeater of Volers. NETCOUTOSTATE o $SAMN TOTAL POSITIONS = 1011 Orange County 2001 June 1,1995 Page 10 •Treasury and Investment. The State Treasurer's OMoe adminlstere the Local Agency Investment Fund [LAIF) `ate for those local agencies that choose to place their revenues under Me State Treasurer's guidance. Orange County 2001 would,in effect,require those agendas Met Owe not to Invest their funds stone to use the Stele Treasurer's pool on a fm4or-service basis. NETCOETTOSTATE . Je MN TOTAL PO9mON5 . 10 •Department of Education. While the County of Orange does not new have any direct budget or management authority over Me Orange County Department of Eduwtbn,in the spud[of looking at everything government does" locally.this part of Me OC 2001 proposal would shin or of this depemnenrs operwans to the State Departroent of Education or to local school districts. NETCOWTOSIATE . Not A.110le TOTAL POSITIONS . Not Avall•Me •Property Tax Administration. Under cument law,the Treasurer-Tax Collector collects property taxes for the area's schools.titles,anal special districts. The County Assessor evaluates real property and prepares the tax rolls. The Tax Collector can levy a property tax administrator,fee to cover the costs of collectiog the property Mies. OC 2001 would comma with the Stale of California to administer local property tax collection and property assessment on a fee-for-service end cost-recovery beets. NETCOSTTOSTATE . as TOTAL POSITIONS = 61 •Courts and Marshal. The Stele of California cumentiy funds more Men 80%of the superior and municipal courts' operations. Following in Me spirit of a proposal advanced by Governor Wilson In his FY 1995.96 slate budget.Mis proposal would shift full responsibility for both funding end operations of the court system to the State of California and merge the Countys superior and municipal courts. The hundred cost savings come from the elimination of the county share of the contributions to both the courts and the Members office-the stale would have to fund courts fully In order to avoid additional cuts at this level. NET COST TO STATE " 715211N TOTAL POSITIONS - leas The Unincorporated Area Orange Countys remaining unincorporated areas(Aliso Viejo, Coto de Caza, Dove Canyon, Foothill Ranch, Leisure Worid/Laguna Hills, Midway City, North Tustin, Ponola Hills,and Rossmoor)encompass about 10%of the county's population. Orange County 2001 envisions these areas as either becoming annexed to neighboring cities or, in some cases,incorporated into cities themselves. Under current law,the most significant barrier to cityhood for these areas is the provision in state law(Government Code section 56845)which requires that any proposal for Incorporation result in an equal exchange of revenue and responsibility for service delivery(the so-called"revenue neutrality'law). This law allows,however,for an exemption to the revenue neutrality provision if the county and all of the subject agencies agree to the proposed incorporation. Under Orange County 2001,all of the region's unincorporated areas would turn 10 cityhood by the year 2001. Incorporation would follow current state law,which requires several preconditions and steps if the proposal for Incorporation comes from local residents: •The area must contain at least 500 registered voters. •25%or more of the registered voters in the area must sign a petition. •The application for incorporation goes to the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO)with a feasibility study. •LAFCO reviews study and certifies Its contents. • LAFCO holds public hearings. Orange County 2001 June 1,1995 Page 11 •LAFCO adopts resolution approving,modifying,or disapproving proposal--LAFCO cannot approve the proposal If it finds that the revenues going to the new city are not equal to the county's service expenditures on the area covered by the new city UNLESS the county and all affected subject agencies agree on the transfer. •Board of Supervisors calls for election if lass than a majority protest. •Election held on incorporation and on council candidates. Revenuelssues The issue of revenue neutrality will remain a barrier to regional reorganization unless the State of California devises a new way of apportioning revenue sources. For example,property taxes are distributed in Orange County between the County, special districts,cities, redevelopment agencies,and schools in a manner that is unlike the distribution in any other county. In fact,the County of Orange receives the lowest portion of county-generated property tax than any California county at about eight cents on the dollar. As such,the county is considered a"donor"county, giving far more revenue to the state than it receives back in services (some estimates place this difference at about$2 BN annually). To help restmctum the way services are delivered in Orange County, OC 2001 suggests that the State of California devise a new method of revenue apportionment that ties specific sources of revenue with specific programs. For example,the sales tax may best be used for state services like K-14 education. The property tax, however, might best be used to fund property-related services like public safety,parks,libraries,and other services that the state may not have as strong an interest in insuring an even level of funding across the entirety of the state. Such a restructuring would be highly controversial--cities that rely heavily on the sales tax,for example,would see a dramatic change in their funding formulas. Counties that are used to being "recipient"counties(as they get a much larger share of the local property tax)would see a similar shift. Many argue,however,that such a change is the only rational way to deal with the realities of a post-Proposition 13 world where programs now have little or no connection to funding sources. OC 2001's Requirements for Implementation Only a small portion of Orange County 2001 can be completed without state authorization--most changes require state legislation(and amendments to the California Constitution): OC 2001 —No State Authorization Required •Incorporation and annexation of remaining unincorporated area. •Consolidation of special purpose districts. •Ability to Invest in State Treasurer's Local Agency Investment Fund(LAIF). •CC Fire Authority transfer to ORSA. •Transfer of planning and land use functions to cities.areawide MPO designation. OC 2001 —State Legislative Changes •Transfer of Measure M authority from OCTA to ORSA. •Transfer of OCTA itself to ORSA. •Transfer of courts and marshal to State of California. •Transfer of registration and elections function to State of California. •Transfer of assessment and property tax collection operations to State of California. •Ability to privatize ORSA administrative functions. •Ability of State Treasurer to receive and disperse operating revenues of ORSA,schools,cities, and special districts. • Elimination of County Department of Education. Orange County 2001 June 1,1995 p Page 12 OC 2001 —State Constitutional Changes •Ellminatlon of a county Board of Suporvisors. •Elimination of elected county sheriff. •Elimination of elected county assessor. What's Next Orange County 2001 will be presented formally to the Orange County Division of the League of California Cities and to the California Constitution Revision Commission(CCRC),a 23-member body that has been charged with revising the state's constitution to reflect modem day changes in governance. As planned at this time,Supervisor Bergeson Intends to ask the CCRC to establish within the State Constitution an alternative governance structure based on this proposal. If the counties voters so wish and If the Constitution is appropriately amended beforehand to allow the alternative,voters would then be able to establish a"county mayor"system. The CCRC meets throughout the summer in various California locations. Mr. Fred Silva, Executive Director of the CCRC can be reached at: The California Constitution Revision Commission 1201 K Street, Suite 1740 Sacramento,California 95814 916/322-4121 (phone) 91 W23-3927(fax) The CCRC Is currently in"Phase Two"of their work to propose a full revision to the California Constitution. The phases are as follows: •Phase One involved workshops held on state and local governance Issues(September 1994 through February 1995). •Phase Two Is for the assessment of issues for revision and will last until August 1995. •Phase Three begins when the Commission adopts and submits a report to the Legislature and as the Legislature holds hearings on the report(August 1995 through December 1995). •In Phase Four,the Commission will ask the State Senate and State Assembly to Introduce a constitutional amendment that would place the proposed revisions before the Legislature and the voters in November 1996. Membership of the California Constitution Revision Commission consists of: William Hauck.Chairmen When Appointee Senator Lucy Killea Senate Rules Appointee Senator Bill Leonard Wilson Appointee Andrew Baron Senate Rules Appointee Don Senninghoven Wilson Appointee Belly Tom Chu Senate Rules Appointee Pal Call Wilson Appointee Lewis Coleman Senate Rules Appointee William P.Clark Wilson Appointee Anne Baker Senate Rules Appointee Roben Grady Wilson Appointee Alan Heslop Wilson Appointee Assemblymen Phil Isenberg Speaker Appointee Jane Pisano Wilson Appointee George Bebiklan Speaker Appointee Leon Williams Wilson Appointee Chu]L.Tsang Speaker Appointee vacancy Wilson Appointee Elizabeth Cabraser Speaker Appointee Malcolm Lucas Ex Cards Ruse Gould Ex Olticm Uz Hill Ex O01do \ , `•rri Orange County 2001 Junel,1995 Page 13 Conclusion The Orange County bankruptcy presents the County of Orange with both problems and opportunities. The problems,from layoffs to service cutbacks, are well known--but less attention has been paid to the opportunity to truly recreate county government to reflect 21 at Century realities. If given the chance to start from scratch,which services should be provided by which levels of government? Is there a way to match dollars with programs rather than to levels of government? And are full-time boards of supervisors really necessary anymore? Can counties be better managed R run via a structure similar to a corporation? These are all questions that need to be addressed in any restructuring that the County and its cities might pursue. Orange County 2001 is not perfect and certainly will cause controversy within those entitles that face reduction or elimination. It is hoped that its critics, rather than to deride Orange County 2001 as"unworkable,"will offer instead an alternative plan that is as bold in examining the changed nature of the urban California county. . NI 4%-9.1)AM 9 The Orange County Bankruptcy Round Table Chapman University July 19, 1995 rsenveesox v v nm Today's Presentation Defining the Problem Paul Sachs Arthur Andersen LLP Legal Background Bruce Bennett Hennigan, Mercer R Bennett Potential Solutions Christopher Varelas Salomon Brothers M10( --I ISAM Defining the Problem Paul Sachs Arthur Andersen LLP aHnrar�o0o e se nni Pool Facts Orange County Investment Pool Loss Analysis (Dollars In Billions) Investment Balance Pro Rata Dec. 6, 1994 Available Cash Pro Rata Loss Count ' ............_$2.4..._._._. ............._$1_.9._._._._.........._ . ._$0:5 Non-County: Schools 1.0 0.8 0.2 Cities,Water,,Sewer.&Transportation. .4:1 _.............._..............31.._ --.--...-._._....__1.0 Non-County Total..........--_.......__...._. __.+._. 5.1 .............3.9....................._...............__l: ...._....... _._._._.... Pool Total $7.5 $5.8 $1.7 ANTI 'UC.L%AM Pool Settlement The Investment Pool Settlement (average amounts) Schools Non Schools 0 Repayment Claims t ;,� _ Repayment Claims Recovery Notes Senior claims 15.99_ I Recovery Notes Cash Cash 3 County Pool Investments Approximately 500 administered accounts were invested in the County Investment Pool on December 6, 1994 totaling$2.4 billion dollars. Debt Repaymem MAM Undistributed Taxes 4N,n4 Other M7,M General 118,9n Trusts Waste Managemem R8,435 E I Bene(ils)A18 mp nyee VbbM Sge[e:$eum:lMCeunlYol Q.x.ae axltl6l J/1!/95 ANP( %-a:5'AM The County of Orange Budget The County's discretionary funds are a small portion of its total budget Dedicated General Funds (Stale&Federal) $1.2 Billion Discretionary General Funds 411 540 Milli. Dedicated Funds $2.1 Billion Soune:The CaunlYal QenY.e H{000961"i'st 'i The Budget Shortfall Severe losses in interest income have dramatically decreased available funds. 140 170 2 0 E C Fn 40 . . m i Properly Mmor Whiele Fund Belanm Inlem, S.I.T.— Other Tus Fes AraileMe Enrnings FY 94-950rigieud Budget F 94-9517reliminary Budget Son«e5enrte:]MCounly of Orrryp µ(Q61]/IB/95 Q County of Orange General Fund Summary of Ongoing Budget Reductions D.11",in Millions) Fiscal Year 95 Fiscal Year 96 Revised Budget Preliminary Budget % Reduction Revenues $293 $275 6% ._..._._........................_........_.___....._.__...__._._.__._._............__.........................................._._..._._.................. ._._........._._...._._._............._._ Expenditures: Public Protection 160 121 24 General Government 81 61 25 Community &Social Services 74 54 27 Health Services 40 26 35 Insurance &Reserves 88 2 98 „Other 20 11 45 Total Expenditures $463 $275 41% Preliminary Deficit ($170) $0 100% 7 Z O Vo a• 1 �i o 7 County Obligations and Allowed Claims Assessment of County Obligations and Allowed Claims (Del4nin Millions) Original Type Estimate Comments Recovery Bonds $236 Only interest has been budgeted thus far; principal payments begin in 2001 County Debt Shortfall 423 Reduced to$356 with issuance of Teeter Bonds Secured Claims 342 Represents 9t on the dollar to non-school participants(to a total of 89e);secured by litigation proceeds County Non-debt Shortfall 360 To be clarified by completion of Pool Map Vendor Claims 100 To be clarified by Vendor Map Repayment Claims 513 subordinated claim ..................._. ......................._....._.--......................................................._.............................._._......._.......-............................._......._._....._... Total $1,974 Total does not Include administrative claims which are currently estimated to be approximately $30 million and roll-over accrued interest of $23 million. The County's objective must be payment In full of all lawful obligations. The County has agreed to exert its best efforts to repay allowed claims including the "County Debt Shortfall", "Secured Claims",and "Repayment Claims". 9 RNOPR[i alK /SA MI County Non-Debt Pool Loss Assessment of County Non-debt Pool Loss The 40 largest County accounts comprise over 90% of County related funds. Each of the 40 largest accounts are being analyzed to determine potential liability and/or potential availability of funds for interfund borrowing and/or to satisfy other allowed claims of the County. Assessment of post-petition balance adjusted to reflect portfolio losses Determination of draw-down since Chapter 9 filing Assessment of commitments of beneficiaries of accounts Pre-petition Vendor claims Future commitments Determination of funds available to be drawn-down to satisfy future General Fund requirements Assessment of account deficiencies which must be satisfied in full due to legal or economic requirements Assessment of remaining balance availability Interfund borrowing Economic limitations Permanent appropriation to satisfy allowed claims Legal hurdles Potential legislative assistance / relief R_ )C�r56 AM Public Debt Outstanding The County has a significant short-term public debt shortfall Summary of County's Original Short-Term Public Debt Obligations Irbllan In Milliwn) Original Available Type Maturity Princlpal Total Collateral (a) Shortfall Tax ExemptTRANs: Series A 7/19/95 $169.0 $176.6 $27.9 $146.7 Tax Exempt TRANS: Series B 8/10/95 31.0 31.3 0.0 31.3 ..Taxable Notes.........................................................7/10/95.........................600:4........................604:...........................428:�`........._..............175.6... Total $800.0 $812.0 $456.4 $355.6 (.) A...0 edlmnd for P.1I ee. 11 PNOI`PCS,IXK.9:16.1M Potential Solutions Christopher Varelas Salomon Brothers Potential Solutions New revenue options available to the County fall under one of the following eight categories Increase existing taxes or user fees Create new tax revenue stream Divert existing tax revenues from Orange County agencies, enterprise funds and special districts to the County of Orange General Fund Appropriate existing reserves of Orange County agencies, or reallocate County reserves from currently intended use to that of allowed claims Restructuring of existing debt obligations Sale of assets Privatize services Expense t budget reductions 13 ANO�FCS�CK B56 AA1 Criteria for Evaluating Revenue Options The Recovery Team utilized the following criteria in evaluating revenue options available to the County Materiality of revenue stream Component borne by Orange County residents Distribution and equity of burden; "who pays" Tertiary impacts to County economy and business development Positive and negative externalities County's ability to act unilaterally/need for third party cooperation or approval Timing Probability of achieving desired results a"i� ax-asc nn� Potential Solutions - Selected Examples Increase In Existing Taxes Diversion of Existing or User Fees f New Taxes Tax Flows Appropriation of Reserves Sale of Assets Waste management Measure M sales tax Enterprise funds John Wayne Airport Sales tax Bradley-Bums sales tax Special districts Waste management "Sin"taxes Property taxes County accounts Buildings/ land Utility tax Tax growth /increment Harbors,beaches and parks Hotel and bed tax Business license fees Parceltax Gas tax Restructuring of Privatization f Expense/Budget Existing Debt securilizalion Reductions Delinquent property taxes EMA,jails,etc. Unrestricted revenues Long-term leases Essential use buildings Total County budget Mandate relief 15 eosr� x.ennu '$ Financial and Legal Update Presentation from the Office of the CEO . July 18, 1995 Salomon Brothers llennlgan.Meurer & Bennett 605FP61 OCC !11 AM FINANCIAL AND LEGAL UPDATE / IULT 19, 1995 Agenda I. Assessment of County Obligations and Allowed Claims 11. Assessment of Previously Identified Revenue Sources Available to the County Ill. Overview of Potential New Revenue Sources IV. Assessment of Cash Flow and Capital Requirements of the County for the Near. and Long-Term V. Recommended Action Plan t CSalomon Brothers r Ilennigan.Mercer& Bennett rUS�-.,UUr�111 AM FINANCIAL AND LEGAL UPDATE I IULY 10, 199S County Obligations and Allowed Claims Assessment of CountyQbligatlons and Allowed Claims IDollen N MIIEom) , Original Type Estimate Comments Recovery Bonds $236 Only interest has been budgeted thus far; principal payments begin in 2001 County Debt Shortfall 423 Reduced to$356 with issuance of Teeter Bonds Secured Claims 342 Represents 9t on the dollar to non-school participants(to a total of 89t);secured by litigation proceeds County Non-debt Shortfall 360 To be clarified by completion of Pool Map Vendor Claims 100 To be clarified by Vendor Map Repayment Claims 513 Subordinated claim ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Total $1,974 Total does not include administrative claims which are currently estimated to be approximately $30 million and roll-over accrued Interest of $23 million. The County's objective must be payment In full of all lawful obligations. The County has agreed to exert its best efforts to repay allowed claims including the "County Debt Shortfall", "Secured Claims",and "Repayment Claims". 3 Salomon Brothers Ilennigan.Mercer& Bennett BO$PR[S]OCC 111 AM FINANCIAL AND LEGAL UPDATE I JULY 18. 1995 11. Assessment of Previously Identified Revenue Sources Available to the County S C- Salomon Brothers ` llennigan,Mercer& Bennett i s •-• OUSC,CDC-I II AM FINANCIAL AND LEGAL UPDAT! I MY SL H95 111. Overview of Potential New Revenue Sources 7 Salomon Brothers llennigan.Mercer& llennell anfre[Saoa eNAM FINANCIAL AND LEGAL UPDATE / IULY IE. 199E New Revenue Sources Summary of potential new revenue sources Diversion/ reallocation of existing tax flows Sales Tax Bradley-Burns Measure M Property taxes to special districts Tap Into excess reserves, if any, of County accounts and County related agencies Long-term asset monetization Restructure existing long-term debt obligations to add new debt capacity 9 Salomon Brothers llennlgan.Itlercer& Bennett - a aose�_.sloenAM � e FINANCIAL AND LEGAL UPDATE / IULY la. 1995 Bradley-Burns Sales Tax Summary o/Bradley-Burns Sales Tax Collections by City(a) (OBllan In Mll0onsl E.1.A 1996 City C.Ib.lbn. I.ro.nl Mandm $31.9 11.3% Santa Ma 29.9 106 Irvh1e 29.4 9.2 Cdsta Mesa 25.1 91 Orange 18.2 6./ Huntington&aLh 16.1 5.8 Fullenon 12.9 4.6 Tu.11n 11.6 4.1 Newport Beath 11.5 1.1 G.rden GPJVP 11.3 4.0 Brea 10.1 3.6 Buena Park 8.6 3.1 WeEIPPWler 6.5 30 Founuln Valley 6.2 2.9 MWion Viejo 23 2.2 take Forest 4.4 16 V Habra 1A 1.1 CYPIno, 3.9 1./ us.Niguel 3.2 1.3 U'.HNs 36 1.3 York.Lbul. 3.0 1.1 San Clemente 2.9 1.0 Phanua 2.9 1.0 5.nluan Capistrano 2.7 1.0 Sunton 1.3 0.8 2,g11n.Beata 2.2 0.8 o.1u PONI 2.1 ae Ins Alamilos 19 0.2 Sai 9earh 1.5 0.5 V Palua 1.0 0.4 Villa Park 0.2 0.1 Total 8282.0 100.0% (al Eromaled Fool year 19951996 pr9iethm..by the CaM9mia Stak Woo of EquaBaaaon. �l Salomon Brothers llennigan.Mercer& Ilennell fl OJEfl GI OUC tl II AM FINANCIAL AND LEGAL tMATE / NLY IF, IM Bradley-Burns Sales Tax Reallocation of the Bradley-Burns sales tax will require State legislation overriding a local ordinance provision. Primary usage of the Bradley-Burns sales tax revenues appears to be bus transit and support. Analysis must be completed of impact to bus system of retaining all or some portion of sales tax revenue and the possibility of utilizing some portion of Measure M dollars to augment lost revenue. �^ Salomon Brothers � Ilennigan,hlerttr d Ifennclt A . 9osrM. �ucell ram FINANCIAL AND LEGAL UPDATE I INLY 16. 1991 Special District Property Tax Allocation Summary of Special District Property Tax Allocation (Dolton MMllllom) Bnslo Total Basle Levy as Reserves as Prellminsry Property Tax Operating a%el Total a%el Basic INalleestlon Levy(.) RevenusRl Revenue Reserva.w Levy Target Sanitary Districts $33.6 $162.6 20.7% $512.4 1523.8% $33.6 Flood Control 32.3 50.2 64.4 114.5 354.0 3.0-8.0 Water Districts 28.4 305.0 9.3 81.1 285.4 28.4 Harbors,Beaches&Parks 27.1 56.4 48.1 26.9 99.1 15.0-20.0 O.C.Transit District 4.7 127.7 3.7 128.4 2754.5 4.7 Vector Control 1.8 6.3 29.3 3.0 165.9 0 CSDs 1.4 - •• -- -- 0 Cemeteries 0.6 1.7 36.6 6.6 1083.5 0 Libraries&Other 2.1 -- - -- -- 0 .................................-.........................................-...................................................................................................................-......-...............................-......._......0-$................. Total $132.1 $709.8 18.6% $872.9 660.7% $85.0-$95.0 1J 19991999aualyeErbmleprWrty eE kvleapN,,NMdby aNAUNId CMDEUe 5TEEUNI. Ibl Tdal operating Nvenue hm been nNmmed bom Ne mml enenl,audi9ed Itru9NW aummmam N Ne<ax of Hahon,&arMa erM ParW erJ UN Fla9d Control DiaMd lrom Ne 199S1996 Cauny9JOrangr R99o9d aWgd. flgulndonotbWude hea lnkd for repaymml oldebl. Iq a«rvn have bm1 namaad hom Ne mdl rermL aadlhd Mandl saNnNne Dr a aN emeol Webon.&adNaaM Pvba aM dN Flood Conlml Di9MN bom NN 1999.1996 C9uny UJOmnge Prepared audgd. 1s Salomon Brothers llennigan.Mercer& Benoelt PVSI'fl61000 tl II Anl n NANCIAL AND LEDAL UPDATE / JULY %I. Irrr Summary of New Revenue Sources (Dollars in Millions) Assuming the necessary legislation can be attained, the aforementioned revenue sources would provide the following revenues Low High Low High Bradley Burns Cities 1/8t 1/0 $35 $70 Transportation Authority 1/80 1/0 35 70 ........_._._........_........................................_. ."-_-........_...._.._.......__......_...._._....._......................... Special Districts Property Tax Revenues 85 95 Reserves (one time) — — .............................._......................................_..........................._...........--_......_..................................._.............. Lease Restructure tone time) 100 120 Some combination of these revenue streams will he necessary to facilitate a Plan of Adjustment which pays all allowed claims 100it on the dollar. 7 Salomon Brothers Ilennigan.Mercer & llemlell ' All rK 1.11.1 FINANCIAL AND LEGAL UPDATE I IDLY 19. 1995 Assessment of Cash Flow and Capital Requirements Other than Recovery Plan related financings, the County of Orange can and will have to limit its access to the public capital markets in the foreseeable future Preliminary analysis indicates that the County's 1995-1996 TRANs needs may be a maximum of$50 million. Preliminary analysis of County accounts indicates that sufficient funds are available to satisfy the County's TRANs needs through interfund borrowing. Interfund borrowing will ensure access to needed funds. There will still be an interest cost of less than $3 million incurred in connection with Interfund borrowing during Fiscal Year 1995.1996. Future TRANs needs may be higher unless set aside provisions contained in Pension Obligation Bonds can be renegotiated or modified in a Plan of Adjustment. 19 Salomon Brothers llennigan, Mercer& Belmelt ea5rrsv ooc n1 AM FINANCIAL AND LEDAL UPDATE I DULY 19. 1995 Recommended Next Steps Further refine and estimate shortfall between likely revenue sources and allowed claims Refinement of sources and uses Complete County Account Pool Map Complete Vendor Pool Map Complete comprehensive financial analysis of special districts, cities and transportation agency Cash Flow and balance sheet analysis Assess availability of property tax allocation for potential reallocation to the County Assess credit implications and impact to user fees of a reallocation of revenues Research legislative Issues associated with reallocation of sales and property taxes and appropriation of reserves Further analyze existing lease obligations and asset lives Estimate borrowing capacity from restructuring of current lease obligations Analyze County accounts to determine the nature of the shortfall and potential availability of reserves Finalize estimate of 1995-1996 TRANs needs and interfund borrowing capacity 21 Salomon Brothers liennigan,Mercer 3 aennen ( A POSIP��HKP.IIAM FINANCIAL AND LEGAL UPDATE / FULY IP, 1995 Addressing the Concerns of the State Legislature Any Recovery Plan which requires State legislation should emphasize the following points. No incremental revenue flows will be required of the State. The financial crisis will be contained and solved within the confines of Orange County. The County's debt obligations will be satisfied thereby avoiding any additional or continued spillover effect to the State's and surrounding municipalities'ability to borrow and cost of borrowing. Potential concerns of the Legislature regarding the reallocation of tax flows to County related agencies should be addressed directly. The precedent set by the State will affect counties state-wide. Harsh impacts to user fees and the provision of essential services will constrain the size and scope of any reallocation. w 23 Salomon Brothers tlennigan.Mercer 3 Benllcll JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING .r JULY 26, 1995 Agenda Item (7)(a) & (b): Annual election of Joint Chair(Nominee: Director John C. Cox, Jr.); and, nomination and election of Vice Joint Chair. Summary As provided in the Joint Boards'Rules of Procedure, nominations for Joint Chair were made at the regular June meeting and the election takes place at the July regular meeting. Nominations and election of the Vice Joint Chair will be conducted immediately following the election of the Joint Chair. For the Directors information, included below is an excerpt from the current Rules of Procedure relative to the election of the Chair and Vice Chair of the Joint Administrative Organization. "Chair and Vice Chair of the Joint Administrative Organization. A Joint Chair and Vice Joint Chair of the Joint Administrative Organization shall be elected by a majority vote of the Districts at the regular meeting in July of each year. The nominations for Joint Chair shall be made at the regular Board meeting in June of each year, and the nominees may prepare a statement of not more than 100 words stating their qualifications for the office of Joint Chair. The statements shall be mailed to members of the Joint Boards of Directors with the agenda and other meeting material for the July regular meeting. The nominations and election for Vice Joint Chair shall be made at the regular Board meeting in July of each year and shall be made immediately following the election of the Joint Chair. The Joint Chair and Vice Joint Chair shall serve at the pleasure of a majority of the Districts. In the event the office of Chair becomes vacant due to resignation or retirement of the incumbent prior to the expiration of the regular term, the Vice Joint Chair shall automatically succeed to the office of the Joint Chair and shall continue to serve through the remainder of the regular tens unless sooner removed by action of a majority of the Districts. In the event the office of Vice Joint Chair becomes vacant prior to the expiration of the regular term, nominations and the election of a Director to serve in that capacity shall be conducted at the next regular Board meeting. The person so elected shall serve the balance of the regularly-scheduled tern unless sooner removed as a result of action by a majority of the Districts. Subject to the provisions of serving at the pleasure of a majority of the Districts, the Joint Chair shall not serve more than two consecutive one-year terms for which he/she has been elected to the office of Joint Chair. Staff Recommendation Staff has no recommendation. J:UPDOCS5\4G95107-01 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES JOINT BOARD MEETING JUNE 285 1995 °\gtRICTS OF co �o c � y J • wW oTFCr�N�THE ENS\P°a� ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2,3, 5,6, 7, 11. 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was hold on June 28, 1995, at 7:30 p.m., In the Distriets'Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation Do roll was caged and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districs Nos. 1. 2,3,5. 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 as follows: \� ACTAT ALTRRt1ATE DIRECTORS DINECTORS DISTRICT NO. 1: Pot McGuman, Chair _ TO R.Miami James M.Ferrymen,Chair we tam _ AMvr ferry g Mart A.Murphy _ Jwme[Baru, Thomas R. Samaillli y Jim Pots _y Roger Sum. _ William G.Steiner DISTRICT NO.2: Jam Collins,Chair _ George Scott Daniel T.Weldh,Chair pro tam g John M.Saslow �L Barry De. Bah Bell Bunn$Dunlap Glenn Parker Norman Z.Elflummde Cool Downey Jam"H.Flora Steve Anderson y_ Pot McGuigan TO R.Moreno y Mark A.MMpM Joanne Cooma —L Julie So CMis None, 1 lexicon Singer George L.Zlaket g Roper Suntan Willa.G. Steiner Bale Zemel Tam Dal, DISTRICT NO.3: 3 Sal A.Seem, Chair Henry M.Dotson 1 Be..Dunlop. Chair pro tam Gleam Parker J� Ceoilm Age Witter Bowman Georgia Brown Frank Lasdo S� John Collins George sea" Z James H.Flora Steve Anderson �;� Don R.Griffin Porky Marshall Z Vaster 4ipaig Ralph Bauer y Wally U. _ Ea G.Miner 1 Pat McGuigan TO R.Moreno 3 Mangle L M. Grace Epperson Io./ Jere Sol Chris Noroy Sheldon Singer George L.Zlaket Roger Summon William G.Steiner Castles Sylvia Robert W I Neesrn y Boo Zemol Tom Daly DISTRICT NO.6: JL_ Jan Dow ,Chair Jam C.Cos,Jr. g William G. Steiner,Chair pro tem _ Roper Stamon 1 John C.Co.,Jr. _ Jan Dailey DISTRICT NO.6: y James M.Ferryman,Chair _ Arthur ferry Jan Oeery.Chair we tam _ John C.Co..Jr. William G. Steiner _ Roper Ssmon DISTRICT NO.7: x Barry Narrational Chair _ Mike Ward _ Themes R. S iltemili,Chair Wo tam Jim Pons x Jan Dena, John C.Cos.Jr. James M.Ferryman Anhw PoM Par MCGa,an TO R.Mariana 1 Mark A.Murphy Jame Comas a William G.Steiner Roger Sumo. DISTRICT NO, 11: t Vimor Lelleig. Chair Ralph Bauer • Shirley Detroit,Clair pro tem Ralph Baum _a— Roger Stamen William G.Steiner DISTRICT NO. 13: g John M.Gaslaxon, Chair Daniel T.WNCh Soo Zemel,Chair pro tam Tom Daly g Mark A.Murphy Joanne Cowan Glenn Parker 1 Burma Dunlap Z William G. Stainer Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO.14: Thomas R.Beneath Chair y Jim Ports a Mork A.Murphy.Chair pro tam Joe"Comma Barry Wmnrand Mike Ward g William G.Steiner Roger Ssmon i Poor A.Swan Darryl Miller .2- O6/28/95 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Don McIntyre, General Manager, Penny Kyle, Board Secretary, Cathy Biele, Don Crapnell, Mark Esquer, Gary Hasenstab, Irwin Haydock, Steve Hovey, Ed Hodges, Patricia Jonk, John Linder, Pat McNally, Mike Moore, Rory Nelson, George Robertson, Misha Rozengurt, Gary Streed, Ed Torres, Chuck Winsor, Paula Zeller, OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Mr. Gold, Bill Knopf, Mary Lee, Andre Lissner, Joseph Martin, Mr. Rosenthal, Phil Stone DISTRICT 14 In the absence of Chair Thomas Saltarelli, Director Appointment of Chair pro tem Jim Potts was appointed Chair pro tem of District No. 14. ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chair advised the Directors that they had Report of the Joint Chair been invited to lake a cruise on The Enchanter, the Districts' monitoring vessel, on July 13 or July 28. The Directors were requested to contact the General Manager's secretary if they were interested in participating. Joint Chair Cox then announced the following tentatively scheduled upcoming meetings as follows: U Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee - Wednesday, July 5th, at 5:30 p.m. Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization Study for Administrative Employees-Thursday, July 6th, at 4:30 p.m. Planning, Design and Construction Committee-Thursday, July 6th, at 5:30 p.m. Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee - Wednesday, July 12th, at 5:30 p.m. Executive Committee-Wednesday, July 191h, at 5:30 p.m. The League of California Cities meeting in Monterey conflicts with the regular July 26th Joint Board meeting. The Joint Chair polled the Directors by a show of hands which reflected three Directors were planning to attend the meeting in Monterey, thus the Joint Board meeting would not be rescheduled. Joint Chair Cox then stated that Executive Committee members should have received an announcement from CASA regarding the annual work conference in San Diego on August 9th through 12th. For those Directors not aware, he stated that the Districts have been a major player in CASA for a number of years and that Directors on the Executive Committee and Districts' staff have been involved in this program. He also mentioned that Tom Woodruff, -3- 06/28/95 General Counsel, would be president of CASA next year. Joint Chair Cox also reported that he `✓ currently serves as the Chair of the Directors' Committee, as well as sits on several other committees and Director Sal Sapien was recently appointed to the Water Committee. Many of the other Directors who participated in CASA are no longer Directors and Chair Cox stressed the importance of the Directors on the Executive Committee to get involved in CASA. DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held May 24, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or amendments to the Aooroval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held May 24, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held May 24, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held May 24, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held May 24, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held May 24, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held May 24, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held May 24. 1995. the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. ..✓ -4- O6/28/95 DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held May 24, 1995. the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duty carried: Ratification of payment of Joint and Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on exhibits"A" and"B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. 05/31/95 06/14/95 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $1,404,438.38 $538,073.30 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 626,873.39 270,677.09 Joint Working Capital Fund - 226,361.10 196,842.70 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 15,309.90 19,976.94 DISTRICT NO, 1 - 0.00 5,032.64 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 11,241.23 52,026.71 DISTRICT NO, 3 - 182,577.61 230,137.88 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 6,901.50 4,458.23 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 0.00 3,402.12 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 8,659.04 4,464.37 DISTRICT NO, 11 - 53,020.33 20,464.11 DISTRICT NO, 13 - 0.00 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 14 - 186,212.03 17,295.25 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 2,739.48 2,061.88 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 206.80 2,652.26 DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 976.09 5,239.14 52,725,516.88 $1 ,372,804,62 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Purchase Order Contract for Rental or Purchase of Emergency That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to receive Disinfection Chemical Metering Pump Feed and file bid tabulation and recommendation and System. Specification No. R-044, to award purchase order contract for Rental or Prominent Fluid Controls. Inc. Purchase of Emergency Disinfection Chemical Metering Pump Feed System, Specification No. R-044, to Prominent Fluid Controls, Inc., for a total amount not to exceed $57,160.00, plus sales tax. -5- O6/28/95 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awardina Purchase of Natural Gas, Specification No. P-160. to Amoco Energy That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Trading Corporation Resolution No. 95-56, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Purchase of Natural Gas, Specification No. P-160, to Amoco Energy Trading Corporation, for the discount price of$.0259/MMBTU, for a one year period beginning August 1, 1995. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Supporting the Reconfiguration of the Orange County Regional Advisory and That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Planning Council (RAPCI Resolution No. 95-57, Supporting the Reconfiguration of the Orange County Regional Advisory and Planning Council (RAPC); and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Joint Chair, be, and is hereby, appointed as the primary representative and Vice Joint Chair as the alternate representative. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the General Manager to designate members of the Boards and/or That the General Manager, or his designee, be, staff to attend and Participate in and is hereby, authorized to designate members of various training Programs. meetings. the Boards and/or staff to attend and participate in hearings, conferences, facility inspections various training programs, meetings, hearings, and other functions conferences, facility inspections and other functions which, in his opinion,will be of value to the Districts or affect the Districts' interests, including, but not limited to, those conducted by organizations providing specific training, state and federal legislative and regulatory bodies and the California Association of Sanitation Agencies, California Water Environment Association, Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies, and the Water Environment Federation; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging and incidental expenses be, and is hereby, authorized in accordance with existing Districts' policies and the approved annual budget for 1995-96; and, FURTHER MOVED: That staff be, and is hereby, directed to provide the Finance, Administrative and Human Resources Committee with a quarterly review of training, meeting and travel expenses incurred. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Annual nominations for Chair of the Joint Administrative Oroanization The General Counsel briefly reviewed the provisions of the Districts' Rules of Procedure relating to nomination and election of the Joint Chair and Vice Joint Chair. This being the annual meeting fixed by the Boards at which nominations are to be made for the office of Chair of the Joint Administrative Organization, the Secretary then declared the nominations open. " -6- 06/28/95 Director John C. Cox, Jr., was then nominated as a candidate for the office of Chair of the Joint Administrative Organization. It was pointed out that nominations would remain open until the regular.) July Board meeting. The Secretary then reported that the election would be held at said July meeting in accordance with the Boards' Rules of Procedures for the Conduct of Business of the Districts. Nominations and election of a Vice Joint Chair will also be held at the regular July meeting. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file draft minutes of the Steering Committee That the draft minutes of the Steering Committee meeting held on May 24, 1995, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file draft minutes of the Planning. Design and Construction That the draft minutes of the Planning, Design and Committee Construction Committee meeting held on June 1, 1995, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file draft minutes of the Operations. Maintenance and Technical That the draft minutes of the Operations, Services Committee Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting held on June 7, 1995, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file draft minutes of the Finance. Administrative and Human That the draft minutes of the Finance, Resources Committee Administrative and Human Resources Committee meeting held on June 14, 1995, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file draft minutes of the Executive Committee That the draft minutes of the Executive Committee meeting held on June 21, 1995, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carded: Authorizing funding in the 1995-96 CORF Budget for continuing studies in the Orange That the funding of$100,000.00 in the 1995-96 County Regional Water Reclamation Proiect CORF budget for continuing studies on the Orange County Regional Water Reclamation Project, be, and is hereby, authorized. ' .. -7- O6/28/95 ALL DISTRICTS (PDC95-211 .� Actions re Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1 Job No. P1-36-2 Verbal report of Director of The Director of Engineering reported that this Engineering project was the final of four construction contracts that will improve the ability of existing secondary treatment facilities to treat primary ef0uent. Mr. Linder then stated that on May 16, 1995, eight bids were received for this project. The bids ranged from a high of$40,427,000.00 to a low of$35,291,000.00, submitted by Margate Construction, Inc., and recommended that the contract be awarded to the low bidder. The engineer's estimate was $42,300,000.00. Approving Addendum No. 1 to the Moved, seconded and duly carded: plans and specifications for Job No. P1-36-2 That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36-2, making miscellaneous technical clarifications, be, and is hereby, approved. Approving Addendum No. 2 to the Moved, seconded and duly carried: plans and specifications for Job Not P1-36-2 That Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, making miscellaneous technical clarifications, be, and is hereby, approved. Awarding Job No. Pl-36.2 to Moved, seconded and duly carried: Margate Construction, Inc. That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 95-58, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36-2, to Margate Construction, Inc., in the total amount of$35,291,000.O0. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS (PDC95-22) Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for design of That the Planning, Design and Construction Job No. J-33-2 Committee certification of the final negotiated fee relative to the Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for design of Main Sewage Pump (MSP) No. 3 Drive at Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-33-2, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 95-59, approving said agreement with John Carollo Engineers for said services on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, subconsultanl fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $193,100.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -8- 06/28/95 ALL DISTRICTS (OMTS95-029) Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adoptina a policy for the Control and Containment of Spills in the Districts' ownetl That a policy for the Control and Containment of and/or Operated Systems Spills in the Districts' owned and/or Operated Systems, be, and is hereby, adopted. ALL DISTRICTS (OMTS95-030) Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Addendum No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with K.P. That the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Lindstrom Inc. for environmental consulting Services Committee certification of the final services negotiated fee relative to Addendum No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with K. P. Lindstrom, Inc. for environmental consulting services to assist staff on NPDES Permit activities; regulatory and legislative liaison activities; and for technical support for sludge management, air quality, reclamation and conservation issues and in connection with CEQA compliance for Master Plan projects, providing for a six-month extension of the agreement, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adapt Resolution No. 95-60, approving Addendum No. 3 to said agreement with K P. Lindstrom, Inc. for said services, providing for a six- month extension of said agreement, on an hourly-rate basis for labor including overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultanl fees and fixed profit,with no change in the total authorized maximum compensation of$295,500.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS (OMTS95-033) Moved, seconded and duly carded: �..� Approving agreement with SAIC for Districts' 120-inch Ocean Outfall. That the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Specification No. P-156R Services Committee certification of the final negotiated fee relative to agreement with SAIC for Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for Districts' 120-inch Ocean Outfall, Specification No. P-156R, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 95-61, approving agreement with SAIC for said services, for the period July 1, 1995 to February 28, 1997. with option for two one-year extensions, for an amount not to exceed $1,486,463.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS (OMTS95-0351 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to issue a Purchase order to South Coast Air Quality Management That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue a District P2-42 purchase order to South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) in an amount not to exceed $250,000.00 for payment of various fees required by SCAOMD regulations, payable during fiscal year 1995-96, estimated as follows: -9- 06/28/95 Type of Fee Amount Annual Emissions $85,000.00 Operating Permits 50,000.00 CARB Emissions 20.000.00 Compliance Source Testing 20,000.00 Permit 8 Plan Applications 60,000.00 Miscellaneous 15,000.00 TOTAL $250.000.00 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratifying Amendment No. 1 to the 1993 Series Refunding Agreement with That Amendment No. 1 to the 1993 Series PaineWebber Refunding Remarketing Agreement with PaineWebber providing that if the Certificates of Participation are converted to a fixed rate of interest mode, "at the direction of the Bank, the Bank will pay the reasonable[remarketing agent's]fee", be, and is hereby, ratified. ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR95-26) Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing Districts' Insurance Broker to Place All-Risk Property Insurance Coverage That the Districts' Insurance Broker, Robert F. Driver Associates, be, and is hereby, authorized to place All-Risk Property Insurance Coverage for 11995-96�,, as follows: ROW N�TERMS: All-Risk Insurance including earthquake and flood, personal property and business interruption. Total Asset Value $1,375,032,593 COVERAGE: All-Risk $200,000,000 Earthquake: CSDOC 30,000,000 DEDUCTIBLE: All Perils $25,000 Earthquake 5% Per Unit, $250,000 min. PREMIUM: -$1,358,000 'Plus taxes and fees of$33,456 „' -70- O6/28195 ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR95-29) / Actions re External Money Manager and Custodial Services Bank for the Districts' Investment Program Approving Professional Services Moved, seconded and duly carried: Agreement with Pacific Investment Management Company That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 95-75, approving Professional Services Agreement with Pacific Investment Management Company, to serve as the Districts' investment manager, and authorizing the General Manager to execute said agreement in form approved by General Counsel. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. Approving Professional Services Moved, seconded and duly carried: Agreement with Mellon Trust Company That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 95-76, approving Professional Services Agreement with Mellon Trust Company, to serve as master custodial services bank, and authoring the General Manager to execute said agreement in form approved by General Counsel. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR95-30) Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving revisions to the Management Performance Review Plan (MPRP) That funds totaling $173,000 beyond the 3.0% of Performance Incentive Values payroll Merit Pool Fund approved last year sufficient to address the more critical range position issues now occurring, be, and are hereby, authorized; and, FURTHER MOVED: That a Target Merit Pool Fund of 5.0% of payroll (totaling $453,000) for implementation in July 1996 sufficient to incentivize performance, as recommended by Ernst & Young, be, and is hereby, established; and, FURTHER MOVED: That provision of extensive training to all supervisors and managers in proper administration of the program as recommended by Ernst & Young, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS (EXEC95-01) Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file General Counsel's Memorandum re Status Report on That the General Counsel's Memorandum dated Proposed Consolidation of Districts June 14, 1995 re Status Report on Proposed Consolidation of Districts, approving, in concept, the consolidation of the Boards, be, and is hereby, received and filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That staff and General Counsel, be, and are hereby, authorized to proceed with additional studies for said consolidation. -11- O6/28/95 ALL DISTRICTS (EXEC95-03) Moved, seconded and duly carried: �./ Authorizing the General Manaaer to approve expenditures of funds up to That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt $50,0000 for Contracts. Services and Resolution No. 95-62, amending Resolution Purchase Orders, Excluding Public Works No. 95-9, authorizing the General Manager to Contracts governed by State Law, and approve expenditure of funds up to $50,000.00 for Professional Services Agreements Contracts, Services and Purchase Orders, governed by Resolution No. 95-9 Excluding Public Works Contracts governed by State Law, and Professional Services Agreements governed by Resolution No. 95-9. Said resolution, by reference hereto, Is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager referred the Directors to a Approving 1995-96 Joint Works Budaets one-page handout included in their meeting folders. Funds He referred to the $599 figure which is the estimated cost of treatment for a million gallons of wastewater for next year. Mr. McIntyre slated he would be making a presentation to every employee and provide them with a summary handout of the budget. Employees will be encouraged to talk and contribute to reducing and/or keeping this cost down. Directors then questioned the increased cost of odor control chemcals. The Director of Finance reported that there are several chemicals involved and the price on each of those chemicals has gone up. Currently caustic soda is the main chemical used for odor control. This chemical was recently rebid and the costs have increased 50% in the unit cost. Mr. Streed mentioned that the Districts are exposed to far less of a risk and the chlorine is out of the budget at this point. He also mentioned that Technical Services is evaluating alternatives to the chemicals used in biofiltration and the biotrickling filter. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: George Brown, John Collins, John C. Cox, Jr., Jan Debay, Barry Denes, Shirley Dettloff, Burnie Dunlap, Norman Z. Eckenrode, James M. Ferryman, James H. Flora, Don R. Griffin, John M. Gullixson, Barry Hammond, Victor Leipzig, Wally Linn, Pat McGuigan, Jim Potts, Margie L. Rice, Julie Sa, Sal A. Sapien, Sheldon S. Singer, Roger R. Stanton, William G. Steiner, Peer A. Swan, Charles E. Sylvia, Bob Zemel NOES: None ABSENT: Cecilia L. Age, Mark A. Murphy That the proposed Joint Operating Budget Funds of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 for the 1995-56 fiscal year, be, and are hereby, approved and adopted as follows: �.d -12- O6/28/95 Fund Total Amount Joint Works Operating/Working Capital $ 54,380,000 Workers'Compensation Self-Insurance 307,000 Public Liability Self-Insurance 272,000 Dental Health Plan Trust Self-Insurance 437,000 Joint Works Capital Outlay Revolving 33,530,000 DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and unanimously carried by roll Approving 1995-96 fiscal Year budget call vote: That the District's 1995-96 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the following amounts: Operating Fund $13,809,000 Capital Facilities Fund 10,904,000 Construction Fund- 1990-92 8,872.000 TOTAL $33.585.000 DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and unanimously carried by roll Approving the 1995-96 budget call vote: That the District's 1995-96 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the following amounts: Operating Fund $53,245,000 Capital Facilities Fund 60,455,000 Construction Fund- 1990.92 24,024,000 TOTAL $137.724.000 DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and unanimously carried by roll Approving the 1995-96 Budget call vote: That the District's 1995-96 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the following amounts: Operating Fund $65,946.000 Capital Facilities Fund 61,204,000 Construction Fund - 1990-92 22,459,000 TOTAL $149.609.000 -13- O6/28/95 DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and unanimously carried by roll Approving 1995-96 Budget call vote: That the District's 1995-96 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the following amounts: Operating Fund $13,415,000 Capital Facilities Fund 14,361,000 Construction Fund- 1990-92 5,674,000 TOTAL $33.450.000 DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and unanimously carried by roll Aoprovina 1995-96 Budget call vote: That the District's 1995-96 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered fled and approved in the following amounts: Operating Fund $12,073,000 Capital Facilities Fund 7,473,000 Construction Fund- 1990-92 2,964.000 TOTAL $22,510.000 DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and unanimously carried by roll �..i Approving 1995-96 Budget call vote: That the District's 1995-96 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the following amounts: Operating Fund $21,726,000 Capital Facilities Fund 17,604.000 Construction Fund - 1990-92 7.323.000 TOTAL $46.653.000 DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and unanimously carried by roll Approving 1995-96 Budget call vote: That the District's 1995-96 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the following amounts: Operating Fund $13,801,000 Capital Facilities Fund 9,920.000 Construction Fund- 1990-92 5,054,000 Bond & Interest Fund- 1958 33 000 TOTAL $26.808.000 -14- 06/28/95 DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and unanimously carried by roll Aoorovina 1995-96 Budget call vote: That the District's 1995-96 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the following amounts: Operating Fund $2,046,000 Capital Facilities Fund 7,511,000 Construction Fund- 1990-92 27 000 TOTAL 9 584 000 DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and unanimously carried by roll Approving 1995-96 Budget call vote: That the District's 1995-96 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the following amounts: Operating Fund $3,521,000 Capital Facilities Fund 9,601,000 Construction Fund- 1990-92 158,000 TOTAL $13.260.000 DISTRICTS 1. 2. 3. 5. 6. 7 & 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Establishing the annual Gann `...� Appropriations Limit for fiscal Year 1995-96 That the following resolutions selecting the annual change in Califomia per capita personal income as the cost-of-living adjustment factor, and establishing the annual Gann Appropriations Limit for fiscal year 1995-96 for each District in accordance with the provisions of Division 9 of Title 1 of the California Government Code, be, and are hereby, adopted by the respective Boards of Directors: DISTRICT RESOLUTION NO. LIMITATION 1 95-63-1 $2,760,000 2 95-64-2 10,548,000 3 95-653 14,521.000 5 95-66-5 2,604,000 6 95-67-6 1,689,000 7 95-68-7 4,805,000 11 95-69-11 3,142,000 Said resolutions, by reference hereto, are hereby made a part of these minutes. �. -15- O6/28195 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly monied: V..� Delegating authority to the Plannina. Desian and Construction Committee and the Ad That the Planning, Design and Construction Hoc Committee re Space Utilization Study Committee and the Ad Hoc Committee re Space for actions re Modifications to the Existing Utilization Study, be, and are hereby, delegated Interior Office Spaces in the Administration authority to solicit, negotiate, award and issue Buildino for the General Management purchase orders to various vendors for Administration and Communication Offices Modifications to the Existing Interior Office Spaces (Specification No. E-256) in the Administration Building for the General Management Administration and Communication Offices (Specification No. E-256), in an amount not to exceed $165,250.00. ALL DISTRICTS General Counsel reported that he and Gary Streed, Status report re Countv's Commingled Director of Finance, had attended a meeting earlier Investment Pool that day with the Investment Pool Committee members. One of the issues discussed at the meeting was the disbursement of interest on the post- petition monies that were in the pool. In order to avoid delay in getting each of the agencies their checks, it was agreed that the post-petition interest that was earned on the fund would be set aside for a week or two because of a disagreement between the County's accounting firm, Arthur Andersen, and the Pool Commmittee's accounting firm, Price Waterhouse. There is a dispute as to the numbers, a variance of$15 million, with Arthur Andersen saying it is $15 million less than Price Waterhouse. The Pool Committee today directed Pat Shea and the representatives from Price Waterhouse to make a demand for the uncontested amount to Arthur Andersen and then work around the difference so that money can at least be distributed to each of the pool members. Mr. Woodruff stated there were also monies withheld by the Wall Street brokerage firms when they liquidated the pool assets. Those sums are being challenged and will hopefully be recovered later. Also discussed was Judge Ryan's ruling of the prior day relative to the proposed roll over of the bonded debt and the agreements related to it that were offered by the County. The investment pool had filed an opposition to the agreement on the basis that it was prejudicial to the rights of all of the pool participants, those rights being the ones that were set forth in the comprehensive settlement agreement. The effect of it was to place the claims of the pool participants in a lower hierarchy and others would have been able to move ahead, thus the protests and objection to the motion were lodged. The Judge did approve the motion of the County on June 27th in the revised forth of the agreement. The Pool Committee this date voted unanimously to direct its counsel to consider and report to the Pool Committee for final decision in one week, of the filing of the appeal of Judge Ryan's order for the same basic reason, as the position of the Districts and the cities has been prejudiced because it is contrary to the terms of the comprehensive settlement agreement. -16- O6/28195 ALL DISTRICTS Action re Office Trailer Relocations at Plant Nos 1 and 2 Specification No. M-044 (Rebid) Verbal Report of Director of The Director of Engineering reported that this Engineering project was originally bid and awarded in 1993, but the contractor defaulted. In 1994 the contractor's surety, Frontier Pacific Insurance Company, agreed to complete the work or accept the Districts' rebid and pay the new contract amount in excess of the original bid amount of $199,200.00. Mr. Linder advised that on June 6, 1995, two bids were received for this project. The bids were for$479,031.00 and $298,700.00, the low bid submitted by Colich & Sons, Inc., and recommended that the contract be awarded to the low bidder. The engineers estimate for the work was $350,000.00. Approving Amendment to Settlement Moved, seconded and duly carried: Agreement with Frontier Pacific Insurance Company That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 95-70, approving Amendment to Settlement Agreement with Frontier Pacific Insurance Company, providing for time constraints and Surety's right to perform work. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. Awarding Specification No. M-044 Moved, seconded and duly carried: (Rebid). to Colich Brothers. Inc.. dba Colich & Sons That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 95-71, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Office Trailer Relocations at Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Specification No. M-044 (Rebid), to Colich Brothers, Inc., dba Colich & Sons in the total amount of$298,700.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes, ALL DISTRICTS Actions re adootion of Ordinance Providing Additional Service Credit to Eligible Districts' Employees Who Retire Early Verbal Report of General Counsel General Counsel reported that the Boards had previously approved the Early Retirement Program for certain employees and all documentation has been submitted to the County. The County's retirement system requires this program to be approved by an ordinance adopted by the Boards of Directors. He further stated that there are no substantive changes In what was previously approved by the Boards of Directors. Mr. Woodruff then advised that only District No. 1 would be required to adopt the Ordinance as it would be acting as agent on behalf of the other Districts. -17- O6/28/95 Receive and file General Counsel's Moved, seconded and duly carried: `ad Memorandum dated June 22, 1995 That General Counsel's Memorandum dated June 22, 1995, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Reading of Proposed Ordinance Moved, seconded and duly carried by unanimous No. 126 vote: That proposed Ordinance No. 126, an Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Providing Additional Service Credit to Eligible Districts' Employees Who Retire Early, be read by title only, and that reading of said Ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived. Adoption of Ordinance No. 126 Moved, seconded and duly carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Pal McGuigan, Chair, James M. Ferryman, Jim Potts, Roger R. Stanton NOES: None ABSENT: Mark A. Murphy That Ordinance No. 126, an Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Providing Additional Service Credit to Eligible Districts' Employees Who Retire Early, be, and is hereby, adopted as an urgency measure to be effective immediately. ALL DISTRICTS General Counsel reported to the Directors the need General Counsel's Comments Prior to for a closed session as authorized by Government Closed Session Code Sections 54956.9, 54957 and 54957.6 to discuss and consider the items that are specified as Items 18(b)(1) and (2) on the published Agenda. No other items would be discussed or acted upon. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Convene in closed session pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9 and The Boards convened in dosed session at 54957.6 8:12 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9 and 54957.6. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Board(s) of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. No action was taken re Agenda Item 18(b)(2). ALL DISTRICTS At 8:24 p.m., the Boards reconvened in regular Reconvene in regular session session. 06/28/95 ALL DISTRICTS Upon hearing a report of its management Termination of Confidential Employees Unit representatives, the Chair reported that during closed session the Boards of Directors acted to withdraw the formal recognition of the Confidential Unit of district employees and to terminate said unit. All employees that were previously in this recognized unit are transferred to either the management group or the recognized representative unit of District Administrative and Clerical Employees ("DACE"). These actions were approved following meet and confer sessions between Districts' management representatives and the Confidential Unit representatives which resulted in agreement to recommend the actions to the Boards. ALL DISTRICTS Actions re Supplemental Agenda Item relative to Summons and Complaint re Unlawful Employment Discrimination, Jane Kaye vs. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. Orange County Superior Court. Case No. 748432 Authorizing consideration of Moved, seconded and unanimously carried: Supplemental Agenda It; relative to Summons and Complaint re That the Boards of Directors do hereby authorize Unlawful Employment consideration of supplemental agenda item relative Discrimination. Jane Kaye vs, to the Summons and Complaint for Unlawful County Sanitation Districts of Employment Discrimination, Jane Kaye vs. County Orange County, Orange County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Orange Superior Court Case No. 748432 County Superior Court Case No. 748432, relative to alleged discrimination and personal injuries as a result of Ms. Kaye's termination as a probationary employee, which was not posted 72 hours prior to the Board meeting date because the need to take said actions arose subsequent to the agenda being posted. Verbal report of General Counsel General Counsel reported that this Summons and Complaint claims employment discrimination. Claimant was employed in the Board Secretary's office as a clerical staff employee and, as with every employee of the Districts, was in probationary status for the first six months. After approximately five weeks this employee was terminated. 19 06/28/95 Receive and file Summons and Moved, seconded and duly carried: Complaint for Unlawful Employment Discrimination, Jane Kaye vs. That the Summons and Complaint for Unlawful County Sanitation Districtsof Orange Discrimination, Jane Kaye vs. County Sanitation County, Orange County Superior Districts of Orange County, California, Orange Court Case No. 748432 County Superior Court, Case No. 748432, relative to alleged discrimination and personal injuries as a result of Ms. Kaye's termination as a probationary employee, be, and is hereby, received and ordered fled; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Districts' General Counsel, be, and is hereby, authorized to appear and defend the interests of the District. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adioumment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:24 p.m. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adioumment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:24 p.m. DISTRICT 5 Actions re proposed Annexation No. 9- Crystal Cove State Park Annexation Approving Agreement with the State Moved, seconded and duly carried: of California. Department of Parks and Recreation That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 95-72-5, approving Agreement with the State of California, Department of Parks and Recreation, in connection with proposed Annexation No. 9- Crystal Cove State Park Annexation, annexation of a 20- acre portion of Crystal Cove State Park known as the Historic District. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -20- O6/28/95 Receive and file request for Moved, seconded and duly carried: annexation and authorizing initiation of proceedings re proposed That the letter dated May 22, 1995, from the Slate Annexation No 9-Crystal Cove of California, Department of Parks and Recreation State Park Annexation requesting annexation of a 20-acre portion of Crystal Cove State Park known as the Historic District, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 95-73-5, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to the District (proposed Annexation No. 9- Crystal Cove Slate Park Annexation to county Sanitation District No. 5). Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adioumment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:24 p.m. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adioumment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:24 p.m. DISTRICT 7 �.,.✓ Actions re Parallel and Replacement of Portions of Lemon Heights Subtrunk Sewer, La Colina Drive to Newport Boulevard, Contract No. 7-2 . and Manhole Access Modifications to RA-14 Sewer at Newport Boulevard at Cowan Heights Drive, Contract No. 7-24 Verbal report of Director of The Director of Engineering reported that this Engineering project is an 8,000 foot long line that will replace smaller, older lines that are over capacity in the Tustin Hills area. Mr. Linder then stated that on May 23. 1995. eight bids were received for this project. The bids ranged from a high of$1,979,877.50 to a low of$1,391,195.00, submitted by Calfon Construction, Inc., and recommended that the contract be awarded to the low bidder. The engineer's estimate for this project was $1,672,475.00. _Y1_ .i 06/28/95 Approving Addendum No. 1 to the Moved, seconded and duly cared: �...� plans and specifications That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Parallel and Replacement of Portions of Lemon Heights Subtrunk Sewer, La Colina Drive to Newport Boulevard, Contract No. 7-22, and Manhole Access Modifications to RA-14 Sewer at Newport Boulevard at Cowan Heights Drive, Contract No. 7-24, making miscellaneous technical clarifications, be, and is hereby, approved. Approving Addendum No. 2 to the Moved, seconded and duly carried: plans and specifications That Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Parallel and Replacement of Portions of Lemon Heights Subtrunk Sewer, La Colina Drive to Newport Boulevard, Contract No. 7-22, and Manhole Access Modifications to RA-14 Sewer at Newport Boulevard at Cowan Heights Drive, Contract No. 7-24, making miscellaneous technical clarifications, be, and is hereby, approved. Awarding Contract Nos. 7-22 and Moved, seconded and duly cared: 7-24 to Calfon Construction. Inc. That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 95-74-7, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Parallel and Replacement of Portions of Lemon Heights Subtrunk Sewer, La Colina Drive to Newport Boulevard, Contract No. 7-22, and Manhole Access Modifications to RA-14 Sewer at Newport Boulevard at Cowan Heights Drive, Contract No. 7-24, to Calton Construction, Inc. in the total amount of$1,391,195.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly cared: Adioumment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:24 p.m. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adioumment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:24 p.m. DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Second reading of proposed Ordinance - No. 1315 That proposed Ordinance No. 1315, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, Establishing Excess Capacity Charge Program, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 1315 by title only. -22- O6/28/95 DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried by the following Adoptina Ordinance No 1315 roll call vote: AYES: John M. Gullixson, Chair, Burnie Dunlap, William G. Steiner, Bob Zemel NOES: None ABSENT: Mark A. Murphy That Ordinance No. 1315, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, Establishing Excess Capacity Charge Program, be, and is hereby, adopted. DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adioumment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:24 p.m. DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Second readina of Proposed Ordinance No. 1407 That proposed Ordinance No. 1407, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 of Orange County, California, Establishing Excess Capacity Charge Program, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 1407 by title only. DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried by the following Adopting Ordinance No. 1407 roll call vote: AYES: Jim Potts, Chair pro tem, Barry Hammond, William G. Steiner, Peer A. Swan NOES: None ABSENT: Mark A. Murphy That Ordinance No. 1407, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 of Orange County, California, Establishing Excess Capacity Charge Program, be, and is hereby, adopted. DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duty carried: Adioumment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:24 p.m. �..r -23- 06/28/95 DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Summons and Complaint for Subrogation Recovery, 20th Century That the Summons and Complaint for Subrogation Insurance Company vs. County Sanitation Recovery, 20th Century Insurance Company vs. Districts of Orange County, at al.. West County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, at al., Orange County Municipal Court, Case West Orange County Municipal Court Case No. 215248 No. 215248, relative to property damage sustained in connection with a Districts'vehicle, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the District's General Counsel, be, and is hereby, authorized to appear and defend the interests of the District. DISTRICT 3 Actions re Los Alamitos County Water Districts' request for representation on the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 Receive and file letters dated Moved, seconded and duly carried: March 9. 1995 and June 8. 1995 That letters dated March 9, 1995 and June 8, 1995 from the Los Alamitos County Water District requesting representation on the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. 4. Presentation by Los Alamitos County The Joint Chair recognized Mr. Joseph Martin, Water District Director of the Los Alamitos County Water District, who stated the Water District was requesting representation on the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3. Mr. Martin stated the areas served by Los Alamitos County Water District are Los Alamitos, Seal Beach and the Seal Beach Naval Weapons Station, providing service to approximately 8,000 sewer connections. In comparison, Midway City Sanitary District serves Westminster, 25% of Garden Grove and the unincorporated area of Midway City. However, Midway City Sanitary District has a representative on District No. 3, but Los Alamitos County Water District does not. He then referred to a letter he received from the Sanitation Districts which stated that the present organization could be revised to change the membership if approved by the Board of Directors of District No. 3. He further stated that every year the Water District sends out an annual report to their constituents, telling them what new projects are going on, what the budget is, but they don't hear from the Sanitation Districts. If the Water District was represented on the Board, they would be able to keep their constituents apprised of projects, problems, budgets, etc. It was then pointed out to Mr. Martin that currently District No. 3 has sixteen Directors, and the areas served by Los Alamitos County Water District has representation on District No. 3 from the cities and Board of Supervisors. Directors also pointed out that "d -24- O6/28/95 back in 1982 a study done by the Grand Jury recommended only one representative from each agency on the Board to serve and that the Districts have been downsizing the representation on all Districts' Boards. Recently the total number of active Directors had been reduced to 30 Directors from 42 members. Mr. Martin then introduced Art Gold, a Director from the Water District. Mr. Gold stated that the Grand Jury report had to do with whether multiple water or sanitary districts were serving the same community, and that the Water District was serving four communities through one District. Directors pointed out that representation by the Water District would go against current Districts' policy in downsizing and that there should not be duplicate representation for the areas the Water District serves. A representative from each of the cities within their boundaries already has representation on the Board. The Joint Chair also stated that one of the challenges of all special districts is to eliminate duplication of efforts. Denying request of Los Alamitos Moved, seconded and duly carried: County Water District That the request of Los Alamitos County Water District for representation on the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3, be, and is hereby, denied; and, FURTHER MOVED: That, as amended by Director Don R. Griffin, annual budgets and portions of the annual reports be forwarded to Los Alamitos County Water District, based upon their request, so that there is ongoing communication. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adioumment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:47 p.m. Secretary of the and Directors of County Sanit ' n acts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 1 , 13 and 14 -25- U FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/26/95 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/31195 POSTING DATE O5/31195 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 144883 AG TECH COMPANY $150,024.31 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9.91 144884 A-Z LOGIC SYSTEMS $197.71 OFFICE MACHINE REPAIRS 1"885 AMERICAN AIR FILTER,INC. $1,274.98 MECHANICAL PARTS 144856 AMERICAN COMPENSATION ASSOC. $695.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 144687 AMERICAN DIVERSIFIED SILVER $1.485.67 REFUND ECSA DEPOSIT 144888 AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE $1,899.00 TRAINING MATERIALS 144889 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION $3.000.00 EMERGENCY SEWER REPAIRS 144890 ANiXTER-DISTRIBUTION 520.87 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 144891 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL $465.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 1"692 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $2.478.01 NOTICES&ADS 144893 APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS,INC. $2.476.86 LAB SUPPLIES 144894 ABC LABORATORIES $2.560.00 LAB SERVICES 144895 ATKINJONES COMPUTER SERVICE $321.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT 144898 RANDOLPH AUSTIN CO. $674.93 FITTINGS 144897 AWARDS&TROPHIES $26.36 PLAQUES 144898 BKK LANDFILL $2,376.39 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9.91 1"899 BANANA BLUEPRINT $9,600.54 PRINTING M.O.11-07-94 144900 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $274.43 BATTERIES X 144901 BAKTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. 54.313.52 LAB SUPPLIES s 144902 BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS $83.84 LAB SUPPLIES 144903 BENZ ENGINEERING,INC. $255.27 COMPRESSOR PARTS 1449M J&H BERGE,INC. $79.33 LAB SUPPLIES 1N905 A BIEDERMAN,INC. $164.79 MECHANICAL PARTS 1"906 BISHOP COMPANY $330.20 TOOLS 1 144907 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $33,840.51 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1.41 ~ 144908 BRENNER-FIEDLER&ASSOC.,INC. $592.30 COMPRESSOR PARTS 1N909 MARK E.BRIGHTLY $3,200,W DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL 144910 BRONSON,13RONSON&MCKINNON $64,889.71 LEGAL SERVICES-COUNTY BANKRUPTCY M.O.12-8-94 144911 BUSH&ASSOCIATES,INC. $678.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.5-8.94 144912 CH2M HILL $68,366.86 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-01 1"913 C.L.TECHNOLOGY $720.00 GAS ANALYSIS SERVICES 1"914 CS COMPANY $4,484.36 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 144915 CALFON CONSTRUCTION $78.231.40 CONSTRUCTION 3-38-2 144916 CALTROL,INC. $498.24 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 144917 CALTEX PLASTICS,INC. $346.40 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 144916 CANUS CORPORATION $26,581.95 FIBER OPTIC CABLE 144919 CAPITAL WESTWARD CORP. $45.18 REGULATOR 144920 JOHN CARDILLO ENGINEERS $7.645.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES M.O.3-&95 144921 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS 5431,613.92 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-38,P1-36 144922 CEILCOTE AIR POLLUTION $3.244.00 ELECTRIC PARTS 144923 CENTRAL VALLEY WASTEWATER MGRS $100.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 144924 CETAC TECHNOLOGIES,INC. $264.54 LAB SUPPLIES 144926 M.C.KENNICUTT $1,671.00 LAB SUPPLIES 144925 CHROME CRANKSHAFT,INC. $1,400.00 PUMP PARTS 144927 COASTAL CHLORINATION $1.00B.00 WATER LINE DISINFECTION 144928 COASTALMOTION $1.332.00 MEMBERSHIP FEES FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 5120195 PAGE2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/31/95 POSTING DATE 05/31195 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 144929 COLD SAWS OF AMERICA,INC. $66.76 WELDING PARTS 144930 COLE-PALMER INSTRUMENT CO. $242.58 LAB SUPPLIES 144931 COLICHANDSONS 588,991.00 CONSTRUCTION M.O.2-8-95 144932 COUCH&SONS $50.262.08 CONSTRUCTION 11-17-1 144933 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $2,467.48 PUMP REPAIRS 1"934 CONNEL GM PARTS I DIV. $139.57 TRUCK PARTS 1"935 CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS $2,335.81 FREIGHT 144936 CONSUMER PIPE $61.20 MECHANICAL PARTS 144937 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC. $456.66 TOOLS 144938 CONTROL DESIGN SUPPLY $332.87 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 144939 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $241.29 TRUCK PARTS 144940 COUNTERPART ENTERPRISES $1,049.35 COMPRESSOR PARTS 144941 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $2.672.78 ELECTRIC PARTS W942 DAILY PILOT $102.00 NOTICES&ADS 144943 HSKBJECKER 52.951.74 GAUGES 144944 DELTA POINT,INC. $81.32 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 149945 DEZURICK AND/OR CS CO. $13.946.01 PLUMBING SUPPLIES X 144946 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $3,633.57 COMPUTER SOFTWARE = 144947 DIVERSIFIED BIOTECH,INC. $33.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES �-+ 144948 ESP NORTH $396.18 TOOLS ry 144949 EASTMAN,INC. $6.513.34 OFFICE SUPPLIES 4 144950 ECOANALYSIS,INC. E1,320.00 CONSULTING SERVICES n 1"951 EDWARDS DIV.OF GS BLDG SYS. $535.49 INSTRUMENT PARTS 1 144952 ENCHANTER,INC. $3,360.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.640-92 N 144953 ENVIROGEN,INC. $1,569.00 PILOT PROJ.EQUIPMENT-BIOTRICKLING FILTER 144954 FMC CORP. $25,153.90 HYDROGEN PEROXIDE M.O.9-14N 1"955 MARSHALL FAIRRES $28.06 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 144956 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $1,820.00 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.D.10.9-91 144957 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $636.80 AIR FREIGHT 1"958 FIRST COMPANY WOR NORTHERN DIST. $156.41 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 144959 FISCHER&PORTER 0O. $38.12 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 144M FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $1.174.30 LAB SUPPLIES 194961 FISIONS INSTRUMENTS $290.60 LAB SUPPLIES 144962 FLICKINGER CO. $1,309.16 PLUMBING PARTS 144963 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $147.76 PHOTO SUPPLIES 1449CA FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT E216.59 PAINT SUPPLIES 14405 FREEDOM IMAGING $70.72 SERVICE AGREEMENT 144966 CITY OF FULLERTON $900.00 WATER USE 144967 GST,INC. $3,608.94 OFFICE SUPPLIES 144968 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $824.95 LUMBER/HARDWARE 144969 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $182.10 CHEMICALS 144970 GAUGE REPAIR SERVICE $290.00 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS 144971 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $6,658.26 TELEPHONE SERVICES 144972 GIERUCH-MITCHELL,INC. 54,403.65 PUMP PARTS $ A9 4 GOVERNMENT INSTITUTES,INC. $47.00 PUBLICATION ES - FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/26M PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID O5131195 POSTING DATE 05/31/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 144975 W W GRAINGER,INC. $612.59 ELECTRIC PARTS 144978 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $48.38 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 144977 GRASBY S.T.I. $4,225.82 ENGINE PARTS 1"978 DGA CONSULTANTS $8,860.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-&94 144979 MACH COMPANY $300.93 LAB SUPPLIES 144980 HARBOUR ENGINEERING $13.687.62 PUMP PARTS 144981 FREDAHARPER $1,100.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 144982 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $820.10 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 144983 HATCH&KIRK,INC. $1,024.40 ENGINE PARTS 144904 PL HAWN CO,INC. $146.09 FILTERS 144985 HILTI,INC. $1,029.94 TOOLS 144986 HOME DEPOT $209.43 HARDWARE 144987 IRS HUGHES CO,INC. $017.77 PAINT SUPPLIES 144988 ORANGE COUNTY FED.CREDIT UNION $680.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 144909 IBG/MICROBE MASTER,INC. $14,384.63 DIGESTER CLEANING 144990 IDEXX $777.07 LAB SUPPLIES 144991 IPCO SAFETY $3,353.58 SAFETY SUPPLIES m 144992 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $57,728.07 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11-18-92 Z 144993 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $28.56 CONNECTORS 1449M ISI INFORTEXT $1,593.64 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 144995 INORGANIC VENTURES,INC. $735.51 LAB SUPPLIES 144M J2 PRINTING SERVICES $505.35 PRINTING 144997 J.D.I.TECHNOLOGIES,INC. $2.613.25 OFFICE SUPPLIES ]? 144998 JAMISON ENGINEERING $24.434.83 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES W 144999 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY. $887,69 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 145000 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO. $58.34 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 145001 JOHNSON CONTROLS.INC. $685.63 ELECTRIC PARTS 14500E JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $131.15 ELECTRICPARTS 145003 THE KEITH COMPANIES $234.70 ENGINEERING SERVICES 3.38R 145004 KING BEARING,INC. $556.65 MACHINE SUPPLIES 145005 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $2,420.99 HARDWARE 145008 L A CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $358.75 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES 1450D7 LAUNDROMAT $45.85 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145008 LAW/CRANDAL,INC. $5,242.50 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.7-13-94 145009 LIMITOROUE CORP. $2,241.17 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS 145010 LOCAL AGENCY $450.00 LAFCO FEES 145011 MPS $15.30 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 146012 MACOMCO $577.20 SERVICE AGREEMENT 145013 MAG-TROL,INC. $68.47 ELECTRIC PARTS 146014 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $199.17 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 145015 MCKENNA ENGR.&EQUIP. $142.01 PUMP PARTS 145016 MECHANICAL DRIVES CO. $248.18 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 145017 MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. $3,496.27 GAUGES 145018 MICRO MOTION $522.25 INSTRUMENT PARTS 146019 MIDWAY MFG.&MACHINING $6.363.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 145020 MINNESOTA WESTERN VISUAL PRES. $85.00 OFFICE REPAIRS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/26/95 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05131/95 POSTING DATE 05/31/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 145021 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3,347.S5 UNIFORM RENTALS 145022 MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION $61,772.98 CONSTRUCTION 14-1-1A 145023 MONITOR LABS $9190 FITTINGS 145024 MONITOR PUBLISHING CO. $213.75 SUBSCRIPTION 145025 MONTGOMERY WATSON $1,664.12 AIR TOXIC$PROJECT M..12-12-90 145026 MORTON SALT $500.62 SALT 145027 MORON INDUSTRIES,INC. $359.32 FITTINGS 145028 MOTOROLA,INC. $513.96 COMMUNICATIONS SUPPLIES 145029 NASCO $308.76 LAB SUPPLIES 145030 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES,INC. $9.500.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 145031 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $1,282.81 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 145032 NEUTRON $1.742.36 ANIONIC POLYMER M.O.S.10-94 145033 CUMMINS CAL PACIOMAN $45.23 ELECTRIC PARTS 145034 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $161.13 SAFETY GLASSES 145035 ON TECHNOLOGY $108.00 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 145036 ORANGE COUNTY FARM SUPPLY $1.529.71 CHEMICALS f1l 145037 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE SBA08.12 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES X 145038 ORANGE COURIER $151.05 COURIER SERVICES S 145039 ORANGE VALVE 6 FITTING CO. $707.65 FITTINGS 14SD40 OXYGEN SERVICE $3.663.04 SPECIALTY GASES 145041 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $9,091.19 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP 145042 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT $88,956.00 GAP WATER USE M.0.6393 n 145043 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $2,338.20 PLUMBING SUPPLIES I 145044 PACIFIC PARTS $13,994.14 INSTRUMENT PARTS/OFFICE EQUIPMENT 146045 PACIFIC PROCESS EQUIPMENT,INC. $314.93 PUMP PARTS 145046 PACIFIC BELL $1,247.70 TELEPHONE SERVICES 1450/7 PACIFIC LAND DEVELOPMENT $2,232.50 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145048 PACIFIC WATER CONDITIONING CO. $598.00 EQUIPMENT RENTALS 145049 PAGENET $1,043.49 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 145050 PARAGON CABLE $36.78 CABLE SERVICES 145051 PARALLAXEDUCATION $4.740.89 TRAINING REGISTRATION 145052 PARKER DIVING SERVICE $34.895.00 OCEAN OUTFALL REPAIRS M.0.4-26-95 145053 PARTS UNLIMITED $773.91 TRUCK PARTS 145054 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $3,524.89 REIMS.PETTY CASH,TRAINING B TRAVEL 145055 PHARMACIA BIOTECH,INC. $460.49 LAB REPAIRS 145056 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $104,616.60 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.5b91 145057 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS $36,337.67 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 145058 PLAINS TRUEVALUE HARDWARE $19.37 HARDWARE 145059 POLYPURE,INC. $15,874.42 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-92 145080 POSTAGE BY PHONE $5,000.00 POSTAGE 14M HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $96.00 ICE 145D82 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE IND. $nS.00 SOIL TESTING 145063 PROMINENT FLUID CONTROL $799.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 145064 QUALITY BUILDING SUPPLY $167.44 BUILDING SUPPLIES C INSTRUMENTS VICES,INC. $569.76 INSTRUMENT ING REGISTRATION 45M R8R PARTS ( C t FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/26195 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/31/95 POSTING DATE 05/31/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 145D67 REBIS $11.693.82 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 145068 REISH MARINE STUDIES,INC. $580.00 OCEAN MONITORING 145069 REMEDYTEMP $1,511.80 TEMPORARY SERVICES 145070 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $1.991.83 VALVES 145071 ROBINSON FERTILIZER $1,411.31 CHEMICALS 145072 ROSEMOUNT ANALYTICAL,INC. $114.56 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 145073 RYAN-NERCO $574.34 METAL 145074 SARBS-PDC $1,800.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 145075 SANWA BANK $113,595.17 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION 14-I-1-A 145076 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INPL $553.703.96 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6A-94 145077 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $1,764.04 SPECIALTY GASES 145078 SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS,INC. $345.00 LAB SUPPLIES 145079 SEA COAST DESIGNS $144.60 OFFICE REPAIRS 145080 SEARS ROEBUCK 8 CO. $359.80 REFRIGERATOR 145081 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $478.41 HARDWARE 145082 SHURELUCK SALES $4.701.82 TOOLSMARDWARE 145083 M.LEE SMITH PUBLISHERS&ASSN. $487.00 SUBSCRIPTION X 145064 SOCOASTAIRQUALITY $3,481.80 PERMIT FEES = 145055 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY $60.00 PERMIT FEES 145086 SOUTH COAST WATER $140.00 LAB SUPPLIES lA 146087 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. $16,114.10 POWER --q 1450BB SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $56.274.03 NATURAL GAS n 145089 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. $28,015.44 DIESEVUNLEADED FUEL 146090 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER $2,653.63 DRINKING WATERMOOLER RENTALS In 145091 WESTALLOY,INC. $236.18 WELDING SUPPLIES 145D92 SPECTRUM CHEMICAL $166.71 LAB SUPPLIES 145093 SPEX INDUSTRIES,INC. $2,455.46 LAB SUPPLIES 145094 SQUARE DICRISP AUTOMATION SYST. $95,883.03 SOFTWARE LICENSE M.O.7-13A4 145095 STERLING ART $138.10 OFFICE SUPPLIES 145096 SUMMIT STEEL $1,900.45 METAL 145097 SUNSET INDUSTRIAL PARTS $186.73 PUMP PARTS 145M SUPERB ONE-HOUR PHOTO $11.84 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 145099 SUPER CHEM CORP. $406.82 CHEMICALS 145100 TCH ASSOCIATES $491.91 LAB SUPPLIES 145101 THERMO JARRELL ASH CORP. $1.308.72 LAB SUPPLIES 145102 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $322.42 MECHANICAL PARTS 145103 TOLEDO SCALE CORP. $1.049.81 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS 145104 TONYS LOCK 8 SAFE SERVICE $651.95 LOCKS 8 KEYS 145105 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES $999.00 TRAVEL SERVICES M.0.6-6-94 145106 TREBOR ELECTRONICS $559.48 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 145107 TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY,INC. $3,455.84 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.O.5-11-94 145108 TRUESDAIL LABS $1,064.25 LAB SERVICES 145109 JG TUCKER 8 SON,INC. $814.83 INSTRUMENT PARTS 145110 TUSTIN DODGE 538.19 TRUCK PARTS 145111 TUTHILL CORPORATION $15.941.52 MECHANICAL PARTS 145112 URISA $90.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/26/95 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/31/95 POSTING DATE 05/31/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR 145113 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $318.00 LAB SUPPLIES 145114 UNISOURCEWOR BUTLER PAPER $644.13 OFFICE SUPPLIES 145116 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $814.67 PARCEL SERVICES 145116 VWR SCIENTIFIC $743.55 LAB SUPPLIES 145117 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $683.57 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 145118 VERNES PLUMBING $3,002.30 PLUMBING SERVICES 145119 VERTEX SYSTEMS $1,252.71 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT 145120 VILLAGE NURSERIES $297.67 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 145121 CARL WARREN&CO. $186.21 UAB.CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR 145122 WATER ENVIRONMENTAL FED. $261.50 PUBLICATIONS 145123 WAXIE $475.39 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 145124 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $30,5%.56 CAUSTIC SODA&HYPOCHLORIDE M 0.8-12-92&4-13-N 145125 WEST-CITE SUPPLY CO. $732.36 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 145128 WfTEG $172.40 LAB SUPPLIES 145127 ROURKE,WOODRUFF&SPRADLIN $55,221.85 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.2-19-92 145128 WORDPERFECT $195.00 PUBLICATION 145120 XEROX CORP. $1,060.70 COPIER LEASES X 145130 RICHARD B.EDGAR $200.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 2 �--i 2,725,516.88 LA ,--I D SUMMARY AMOUNT I T #2 OPER FUND 10.462.23 02 CAP FAC FUND 779.00 03 OPER FUND 8.193.31 93 CAP FAC FUND 174.384.30 #5 OPER FUND 6,901.50 #7 OPER FUND 4.048.75 #7 CAP FAC FUND 4.610.29 #11 OPER FUND 2,018.34 #11 CAP FAC FUND 51,001.99 #14 OPER FUND 48.00 #14 CAP FAC FUND 186,164.03 #5&6 OPEN FUND 128.97 #5&6 CAP FAC FUND 2,612.51 #6&7 OPER FUND 2D8.80 #7&14 OPER FUND 976.09 JT OPER FUND 1,404,436.38 CORP 626.873.39 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND 15,309.90 J7 DIST WORKING CAPITAL 22S361A0 2,725,516.98 ' ' FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 6M9/95 PAGE1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 06/14/95 POSTING DATE 08/14/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 146157 AA EQUIPMENT $861.27 PUMP 145156 AG TECH COMPANY $88.274.21 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91 145159 AT&T-UNIPLAN SERVICE $2,390,92 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 145150 A T&T-MEGACOM SERVICE $958.94 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 145161 AT&T-FAX SERVICE $1,041.42 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 145162 ADAMS PRECISION INSTRUMENTATION $142.77 INSTRUMENT PARTS 145183 ADVANCED MFG.INSTITUTE $795.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION 145164 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS,INC. $36.074.40 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.O.8-9-89 145165 ALLIED ELECTRONICS $139.00 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 145166 AMERIDATA $4,51&70 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 145167 AMERICAN SIGMA $4N 79 OPERATING SUPPLIES 145168 AMSCO $40607 SERVICE AGREEMENT 145169 BLAKE P.ANDERSON $79.97 REIMBURSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE 145170 APCO VALVE&PRIMER CORP. $3,825.13 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 145171 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $6.330.25 NOTICES&ADS 145172 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $3.093.50 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 145173 ABC LABORATORIES $235.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT m 145174 ARI20NA INSTRUMENT $175.37 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES X 145175 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE,INC. $282.20 RECYCLABLE MATERIALS REMOVAL 2 144178 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING E3,408.41 PAYROLL SERVICES 00 145177 AWARDS&TROPHIES $412.29 PLAQUES -1 145170 BKK LANDFILL $2,793.38 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.OAO-9-91 145179 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $1,161.68 BATTERIES �j 145100 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $3,193.37 LAB SUPPLIES I--' 146181 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $270.80 TRUCK WASH TICKETS 145182 J&H BERGE,INC. $79.64 LAB SUPPLIES 145183 BETA TECHNOLOGY,INC. $53.64 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS 145184 BID TECH NET,INC. $3.00 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 145185 BLACK&VEATCH $62,944.67 ENGINEERING SERVICES P146 145186 BRONSON,BRONSON&MCKINNON $25,855.40 LEGAL SERVICES-COUNTY BANKRUPTCY M.0.1241-94 145187 BNI BOOKS $153.64 BOOKS 145/88 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. $946.05 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 145189 CEM CORPORATION $272.13 LAB SUPPLIES 146190 CEPA $2,142.06 LAB SUPPLIES 145191 C.P.I. $755.87 LAB SUPPLIES 145192 CPRA REGISTRAR $1,012.00 WORKSHOP REGISTRATION 145193 1995 CONFERENCE,CWPCA,INC. $190.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 145124 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $536.10 SERVICE AGREEMENT 145195 CALIFORNIA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE $105.36 PUBLICATION 145196 CANUS CORPORATION $39,703.64 FIBER OPTIC CABLE 145197 CAPITAL WESTWARD CORP. $136.86 REGULATOR 145198 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $6,752A4 ENGINEERING SERVICES P143,P1-38 145199 CEILCOTE AIR POLLUTION $142.58 ELECTRIC PARTS 145200 CENTURY SAFETY INST.&SUPPLY $160.00 SAFETY SUPPLIES 145201 CHEMWEST,INC. $414.08 PUMP PARTS 145202 CLARK CONSULTANTS $390.00 ELECTRICAL CONSULTING FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6IMS PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID OB/14/95 POSTING DATE 06/14M5 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 145203 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $75.51 SERVICE AGREEMENT 145204 COUCH AND SONS $26,033.22 EMERGENCY REPAIRS 3-35 145205 COMPUSERVE $292.39 COMPUTER SERVICES 145206 CONSOLIDATED PLASTICS CO. $323.35 TOOLS 145207 CONSTRUCTION FABRICATORS,INC. $1,644.70 MECHANICAL PARTS 145208 CONSUMER PIPE $954.01 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 145209 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC. $345.79 ELECTRIC PARTS 145210 CONTRACTORS EQUIPMENT CO. $156.23 FITTINGS 145211 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $2,732.44 ENGINE PARTS 145212 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $306.05 TRUCK PARTS 146213 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $1.368.76 ELECTRIC PARTS 145214 DAILY PILOT $96.00 NOTICES 9 ADS 145215 DATASTORM $/53.00 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 145216 DAVIS INSTRUMENTS $506.95 INSTRUMENT PARTS 145217 HSKIDECKER $1.324.75 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 145218 DEZURICK AND/OR CS CO. $10,033.89 VALVES 145219 THE DICKSON COMPANY $106.00 ELECTRIC PARTS X 145220 SYCON CORP. $1,198.29 INSTRUMENTPARTS = 145221 DIPPER BAN $80.00 PORTABLE TOILET RENTALS �--i 146222 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $1,856.00 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 145223 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $899.10 PAINT SUPPLIES y 145224 E.C.S. $267.00 PUBLICATION 145225 ESP NORTH $690.44 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 145226 EASTMAN,INC. $2,960.14 OFFICE SUPPLIES N 145227 ECOANALYSIS,INC. $5,220.50 CONSULTING SERVICES 145228 ENCHANTER,INC. $3,360.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6-10.92 145229 ENSYS,INC. $325.40 LAB SUPPLIES 145230 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $1.096.50 LAB SERVICES 145231 EQUESTRIAN FORGE $1,098.66 PLAQUES 145232 FMC CORP. $33,588.35 HYDROGEN PEROXIDE M.O.9-14.94 145233 FST SAND AND GRAVEL,INC. $249.88 ROAD BASE MATERIALS 145234 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $3.877.50 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 145235 FIRST COMPANYWOR NORTHERN DIST. $195.51 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 145236 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $1,935.00 LAB SUPPLIES 145237 FISIONS INSTRUMENTS $1,271.78 LAB SUPPLIES 145238 FLICKINGERCO. $3,634.20 VALVES 145239 CLIFFORD A.FORKERT $2,620.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.641-94 145240 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $91.68 PHOTO SUPPLIES 145241 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $11,276.60 WATER USE 145242 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $193.61 PAINT SUPPLIES 145243 THE FOXBORO CO. $4.149.01 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 145244 CITY OF FULLERTON $139.23 WATER USE 145245 GST,INC. $529.94 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 145246 GAUGE REPAIR SERVICE $684.15 INSTRUMENT PARTS C15247 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. ( $216.36 TELEPHONE SERVICES .5240 GRAHAM MANUFACTURING CO. ` $111.79 PUMP PARTS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6109/95 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 06114/95 POSTING DATE 06114/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 146249 GRASSY S.T.I. $324.65 ENGINE PARTS 145250 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $294.16 OFFICE SUPPLIES 145251 GREAT LAKES INSTRUMENTS,INC. $22,691.32 INSTRUMENT PARTS 145252 DGA CONSULTANTS $2.730.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6894 145253 DAVID R.GRIFFIN $164.306.85 LEGAL SERVICES-TECHITE PIPE M.0.9-14-94 145254 HACH COMPANY $2,003.10 LAB SUPPLIES 145255 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $1,403.92 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 145266 HATCH&KIRK,INC. $575.07 TRUCK PARTS 145257 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS $1.925.00 CONTAINER RENTALS 145258 PL HAWN CO,INC. $8,889.39 INSTRUMENT PARTS 1452N HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT $2,053.33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN. 145260 HOLMES&NARVER,INC. $33.323.52 ENGINEERING SERVICES Pld 145261 HOME DEPOT $263.11 HARDWARE 145262 PIS HUGHES CO,INC. $1,018.80 PAINT SUPPLIES 145263 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $19.65 WATER USE 1452" IPCO SAFETY $1.992.49 SAFETY SUPPLIES 145265 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $110,090.27 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.11-1&92 fn 145266 IMPULSE ENTERPRISE $404.99 LAB SUPPLIES 2 145267 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $1.480.73 CONNECTORS W 145268 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $703.62 BATTERIES 145269 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $15.13 WATER USE —I 145270 J2 PRINTING SERVICES $602.04 OFFICE SUPPLIES LA 145271 AT COMPUTER SOURCE,INC. $818.90 COMPUTER SOFTWARE I 146272 JAMISON ENGINEERING $8,030.33 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES W 146273 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY. $233.47 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 145274 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO. $1,997.07 GAUGE 145275 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $410.06 PAINT SUPPLIES 145276 KALLEEN'S COMPUTER PRODUCTS $62.80 OFFICE SUPPLIES 145277 KEYE PRODUCTIVITY CENTER $139.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION 145275 KING BEARING,INC. $1,515.84 MACHINE SUPPLIES 145279 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $1,752.34 TOOLS 145250 L A CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $57.59 SERVICE AGREEMENT 145261 LATRONICS $2.527.67 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 145282 K.P.LINDSTROM.INC. $1,475.64 CONSULTING SERVICES-ENVIR.M.0.12-9.90 145283 SOHO-LYNCH CORP. $136.61 JANITORIAL SERVICES 145284 MBC APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL $974.10 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6.10-92 145285 MAGNETEK $5,8W.00 SEROCEAGREEMENT 145286 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $103,477.00 CONSTRUCTION P2<2-2 145287 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $038.05 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 145288 MATT-CHLOR,INC. $1,815.69 VALVE PARTS 145289 MAVERIK,INC. $2.887.28 CRANE REPAIRS 145290 CHUCK MCRANEY $511.14 REIMBURSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE 145291 MEDLIN CONTROLS,INC. $3,925.84 INSTRUMENT PARTS 145292 METRA CORPORATION $1,205.40 INSTRUMENT PARTS 145293 MICROSOFT PRESS $169.57 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 1462M MISSION ABRASIVE SUPPLIES $996.89 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 6/09/95 PAGE4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 06/14/95 POSTING DATE 06/14195 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 146295 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3.182.67 UNIFORM RENTALS 145296 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO. $1.214.00 ELECTRIC PARTS 145297 MONITOR LABS $1,616,86 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 145298 NASCO $617.60 LAB SUPPLIES 145299 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $70.35 SAFETY FILM RENTALS 14530D NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $67.17 PUBLICATION 145301 NATIONAL SEMINARS GROUP $594.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION 145302 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $7,356,05 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 145303 NEUTRON $8.693.11 ANIONIC POLYMER M.0.8-10-84 145304 NEW HORIZONS COMPUTER CENTER $60000 TRAINING REGISTRATION 145305 NEWARK ELECTRONICS $22543 US SUPPLIES 145306 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $5.29 WATER USE 145307 NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL $35000 NEW HEALTH ACCOUNT 145308 OI CORPORATION $5,00 LAB SUPPLIES 145309 THE OHMART CORP. $554.41 INSTRUMENT PARTS 145310 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. $135.79 TRUCK PARTS T11 145311 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $2,787.54 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES X 145312 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. $1,178.93 FITTINGS 145313 OXYGEN SERVICE $2.207.26 SPECIALTY GASES by 145314 COUNTY OF ORANGE $5.682.71 SERVICE AGREEMENT 146318 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $17,543.61 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP 145318 COUNTY OF ORANGE $104.00 PERMIT FEES CO 146317 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT $16.175.44 GAP WATER USE M.0.6-9-93 1 145310 COUNTY OF ORANGE HEALTH CARE $1215.00 SEWAGE SPILL REIMBURSEMENT r 146319 P&D ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES $1,336.91 ENVIRONMENTAL SURVEY 146320 PSOC(POOL SUPPLY OF OC) $79.24 OPERATING SUPPLIES 145321 PACIFIC PARTS $8.843.39 INSTRUMENT PARTS 145322 PACIFIC BELL $75.74 TELEPHONE SERVICES 145323 PAINE WEBBER $25.144.69 COP REMARKET FEES 145324 PALMIERI.TYLER,WIENER, S40.0D LEGAL SERVICES M.O.S.12-91 145325 PARKHOUSE TIRE CO. $909.24 TIRES 145326 PASCAL B LUDWIG $8,753.50 CONSTRUCTION PIA2 145327 PERFORMANCE TRAINING ASSOC. $590.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION 145328 PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION $3,085.69 LAB SUPPLIES 145329 PERVO PAINT $148.48 PAINT SUPPLIES 145330 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $5.228.54 REIMS.PETTY CASH,TRAINING&TRAVEL 145331 PIERCE COMPANIES $398.98 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145332 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS $5,572.03 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 145333 POLY FABRICS $2.068.80 PVC LINER 145334 POLYMETRICS,INC. $1,262.75 LAB SUPPLIES 145335 POLYPURE,INC. $28,647.43 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3.11-92 145336 POWER SYSTEMS S47.45 ENGINE PARTS 145337 PRITCHETT AND ASSOCIATES,INC. $201.50 PUBLICATION 38 SERVICE ND. 12,121,00 SOIL TESTING C fi RICIT INC. S ICR CONSULTING TSSERVICES M.O.B 14 RPM ELECTRIMOTORS $4,852.64 ELECTRIC MOTOR PA - FUNDING 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6I09G5 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID O6114195 POSTING DATE O8114/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 145341 R 6 R INSTRUMENTS $82.08 ELECTRIC PARTS 145342 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $1.715.43 TRASH REMOVAL 145343 REGISTRAR,ABWMA $750.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 145344 REMEDYTEMP $3.899.58 TEMPORARY PERSONNEL SERVICES 145345 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $3,779.87 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 145346 RENOLD,INC. $95.19 MECHANICAL PARTS 145347 HOWARD RIDLEY CO. $6.900.00 BUILDING REPAIRS 145348 RM MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL $12.139.24 INSTRUMENT PARTS 145349 MILTON RIVERA $13,044.00 DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL 145350 ROSEMOUNT ANALYTICAL,INC. $114.55 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 14051 SAFETY CARE,INC. $193.96 SAFETY FILM RENTALS 145352 SANCON ENGINEERING,INC. $16,987.32 ENGINEERING SERVICES 145353 R.CRAIG SCOTT B ASSOC. $10.231.28 LEGAL SERVICES,PERSONNEL 145354 CITY OF SEAL BEACH $362.30 WATER USE 145355 SEIKO INSTRUMENTS $76.00 LAB SUPPLIES 145366 SHURELUCK SALES $8.532.04 TOOLS/HARDWARE 145357 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO. $36.69 LAB SUPPLIES m 145358 SIMON S SCHUSTER $84.86 PUBLICATION X 145359 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $401.50 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 2 145380 SMTTH-EMERY CO. $475.00 SOIL TESTING M.0.7-13-94 145361 SOUTH COAST WATER $375.00 LAB SUPPLIES -I 145362 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO. $60,582.97 POWER 145363 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. $16.933.94 POWER �j 145354 SO.CAL,GAS.CO. $4.005.99 NATURAL GAS 111 145365 SOUTH PACIFIC MARBLE S TILE $1,426.16 GROUNDSKEEPING SUPPLIES 145366 SOUTHWEST SCIENTIFIC $927.81 LAB SUPPLIES 145367 SPECIAL PLASTIC SYSTEMS,INC. $946.92 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 145368 STERLING ART $50.14 OFFICE SUPPLIES 145369 SUMMIT STEEL $2,175.69 METAL 145370 SUNSET FORD $273.21 TRUCK PARTS 145371 TAYLOR INDUSTRIAL SOFTWARE $150.00 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 145372 TONYS LOCK&SAFE SERVICE $593.48 LOCKS 8 KEYS 145373 TOSHIBA INTERNATIONAL $76.25 INSTRUMENT PARTS 145374 $0 CALIF TRANE SERVICE $4.384.14 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 145375 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES $2,628.60 TRAVEL SERVICES M.O.BA-94 145376 TRIBEST VISUAL DISPLAY $440.00 PROJECTOR SCREEN REPAIR 145377 TRUCK PARTS SUPPLY $310.74 TRUCK PARTS 145378 TRUESDAIL LABS $4,732.98 LAB SERVICES 145379 JG TUCKER S SON,INC. $2,122.99 INSTRUMENT PARTS 145380 UNISOURCEWOR BUTLER PAPER $395.30 OFFICE SUPPLIES 145381 DATAVAULTAIS SAFE DEPOSIT CORP. $104.00 SAFE DEPOSIT BOX 145382 VWR SCIENTIFIC $860.67 LAB SUPPLIES 145363 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $718.95 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 145354 VARIAN ASSOCIATES,INC. $2,647.10 LAB SUPPLIES 145385 VERNIFS PLUMBING $430.00 PLUMBING SERVICES 145386 VILLAGE NURSERIES $113A1 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES I FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6I0995 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 08/14/95 POSTING DATE 0114415 WARRANT NO. VENDOR 145387 WATER ENVIRONMENT FED. $187.25 LAB SUPPLIES 145388 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $57,869.12 CAUSTIC SODA&HYPOCHLORIDE M.O.8-12-92&4-13-94 145389 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $439.73 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 145390 WESTRUX INTERNATIONAL $243.62 TRUCK PARTS 145391 XEROX CORP. $11.428.57 COPIER LEASES 1,372,11U.62 SUMMARY AMOUNT #1 CONSTR.FUND 85,032.64 #2 OPER FUND 2,983,38 #2 CAP FAC FUND 38,396.73 02 CONSTR.FUND 10,646A0 m 93 OPER FUND 30,421.69 X 63 CAP FAC FUND 1B9,620.35 ._. 03 CONSTR.FUND 10,095.84 tO 05 OPER FUND 3,462.41 #S CONSTR.FUND 995.82 08 OPER FUND 1,430.33 t" 06 CAP FAC FUND 1.700.00 T 08 CONSTR.FUND 271.79 #7 OPER FUND 3,558.93 #1 CAP FAC FUND 142.58 #7 CONSTR.FUND 764.86 #11 OPER FUND 17.986.99 #11 CAP FAC FUND 2.139.98 #11 CONSTR.FUND 337.14 #14 OPER FUND 17,295.25 #5&6 OPER FUND 2,051.88 #8&7 OPER FUND 2,662.25 #7&14 OPER FUND 5,239.14 JT OPER FUND 536,073.30 CORP 270,677.09 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND 19,976.94 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL 198.842.70 (! 1,372,804.62 ti JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING JULY 26, 1995 Agenda Item (9): consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts (each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District). Summary See attached listing of claim payments. and Recommendation Staff recommends approval of payment of claims listing. JAWP�GB 74 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE MIM5 PAGE1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 00135N5 POSTING DATE DIWM5 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 145416 AC DELCO SYSTEMS $812.11 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145417 AGX CORPORATION $1,628.17 GAUGE 145418 ASR ANALYSIS $516.50 PUMP ANALYSIS 146419 ATM AA,INC. $765,00 LAB SERVICES 145420 AT&T-PROWATTS $151.89 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 145421 ADVANCED MFG.INSTITUTE $1,590.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION-MICE PLANNING&SCHEDULING 145422 ALBERTSONS MARKET M04 $221.02 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 141M23 ALLTEK CIRCUIT,INC. $1,940.66 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145424 AMERIDATA $1168.01 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 14U25 AMERICAN AIR FILTER,INC. $1.217.56 FILTERS 145428 AMERICAN POWER PRODUCTS $781.77 TRUCK PARTS 146427 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION 84,5DDBD SEWER REPAIRS 145426 ANLKTER-DISTRIBUTION $8.155.77 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 145429 ABC LABORATORIES $1,395.00 LAB SERVICES 14MM AQUATIC CENTER $1.020.W SAFETY SUPPLIES 145431 ARROWHEAD ELECTRIC CORP. $406.92 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 145432 ARROWHEAD PRODUCTS $1,323.05 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145433 ASSOCIATED VACUUM TECH.,INC. $045.98 PUMP PARTS 145434 AMSA $425.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION-AMSA TECHNICAL CONF. 14MS ATKIWJONES COMPUTER SERVICE $XH.30 SERVICEAGREEMENT 1464M AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $199.77 PAYROLLSERVICES 145437 BANANA BLUEPRINT $9,392.96 PRINNNGM.0.11-07-94 145438 BFRTLETT CENTER 5024.41 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145439 BAUERCOMPRESSOR $139.12 COMPRESSOR PARTS 14WO BARTER EDWARDS $1,550.72 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145441 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $1,890B0 LAB SUPPLIES 145042 BONA-RUES $371.68 TRUCK PARTS 145443 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $24,834.86 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-7-1.3W 145444 BRENNER-FIEDLER&ASSOC..INC. $296.15 COMPRESSOR PARTS 14WS BRISTOL INDUSTRIES 5970.00 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 146446 BUDGET JANITORIAL $3,330.00 JANITORIAL SERVICES 145407 CS COMPANY $162.20 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 146448 CAUPON CONSTRUCTION $352.136.00 CONSTRUCTION IW2 14549 CAL-PAC CHEMICAL CO.,INC. $363.31 CHEMICALS 145450 CALIFORNIAAUTOMATICGATE $1,101.72 SERVICEAGREEMENT 145451 CALIFORNIA FINEBLANKING CORP. $4.400.61 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145452 JOHN D.CASE&ASSOC. $995.00 SECURITY CONSULTANT 145453 CENTURY SAFETY INST.&SUPPLY $4.250,74 SAFETY SUPPLIES 14MM CERFNET $37.40 COMPUTER SERVICES 145455 CHANDLER UOUID ASSET NOW. 52,100.00 INVESTMENT CONSULTANT M.0.24495 145456 CIMCO $913.90 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145457 CINEDOME THEATRES $228.90 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 14USS COAST RUBBER STAMP $90.17 OFFICE SUPPLIES 14UN COUCH&SONS $85.120.00 CONSTRUCTION 11-17-1 145400 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $1.41080 FITTINGS 14UB1 COMPUSA.INC. $312.45 COMPUTER SOFTWARE FUND NO 9199 - .rt DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE MIM5 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID OM&M5 POSTING DATE W12895 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 145482 CONNEL GM PARTS I DIV. $262.01 TRUCK PARTS 145463 CON-WAY WESTERN EXPRESS $113,14 FREIGHTCHARGES 145464 CONSUMER PIPE $49.94 MECHANICAL PARTS 145465 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $1,118.62 INSTRUMENT PARTS 145468 CORANADO SQUARE S1,45D.20 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145467 COUNTERPARTENTERPRISES $2,I07.14 COMPRESSOR PARTS 14548E COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC S1,263% ELECTRIC PARTS 145469 CHARLES P.CROWLEY,CO. $2,570.74 INSTRUMENT PARTS 145470 CUSTOM ENAMELERS,INC. 61,42L11 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145471 SWRCWAFRS $1,00000 MEMBERSHIPFEE 145472 DATA ELECTRONICS SER. $350.94 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145Q3 DELTA DENTAL PUN OF CALIF. 948,01955 DENTAL INSURANCE PLAN M.0.1-12-94 145474 DEL TACO RS 61,77L84 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145475 DENWSRESTAURANT81S09 E481.19 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145476 DEZURICK MDIOR CS CO. $4,232.11 VALVES 145477 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. S5,180.D0 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 14547E DIGITAL LEARNING CENTER $6.780,00 TRAINING REGISTRATION-SUPPORTING WINDOWS NT 145478 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $999,49 PAINTSUPPLIES 14MBO DWYER INSTRUMENT,INC. $218.79 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 145481 ESP NORTH $508.74 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 1454N EATON CORP.NSC PRODUCTS $304.11 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145483 EDWARDS DIV.OF GS BLDG SYS. $146.14 SAFETY SUPPLIES 145484 ELECT AIR TOOL CO. $8.711.82 MECHANICAL PARTS 145485 ENCHANTER,INC. $3,92600 OCEANMONRORINGM.O.6-W92 145488 EVANS CONSOLES $23.020.79 COMPUTER SOFTWARE CONSULTANT 145487 MARSHALL FAIRRES $2608 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 14MM FARRSALESBSERVICE $608.14 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 145489 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $335.97 FILTERS 14UN FISCHER B PORTER CO. 5606.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS 145487 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $553.33 LAB SUPPLIES 145492 FLUORAMICS,INC. $312.56 OPERATING SUPPLIES 145493 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $81.81 PHOTO SUPPLIES 145494 THEFOXBOROCO. S1,733.85 INSTRUMENT PARTS 145495 FRANCE COMPRESSOR PRODUCTS $11,599.27 COMPRESSOR PARTS 145490 DST,INC. S4,613.88 OFFICE SUPPLIES 145497 GSF ENERGY,INC. S4.W3.81 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 14UN GALIADE CHEMICAL,INC. $176.97 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145499 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $1,734.28 LUMBERAHARDWARE 145M GMRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY S438.39 CHEMICALS 1455D1 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $716.88 ELECTRIC PARTS 145502 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. 58,962.08 TELEPHONE SERVICES 145503 GEORGE B SONS COIN-OP LAUNDRY $210.00 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145504 GIERLIC"ITCHELL,INC. $2.957.29 MECHANICAL PARTS 145505 GRAHAM MANUFACTURING CO.,INC. $509.88 PUMP PARTS 145506 GRASBY S.T.I. E569.20 INSTRUMENTPARTS mW7 GREATAMERICANPRINNNG S2,070.05 OFFICE SUPPLIES C FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE WV95 PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 08128195 POSTING DATE 06128195 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 145508 DAVID M.GRIFFITH S ASSOC. 813,600.00 PROF.SERV.-EXECUTIVE SEARCH 145508 H KOCH S SONS $83.15 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145510 HA PENNY INN ANAHEIM $660.41 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145511 HACH COMPANY $105,64 LAB SUPPLIES 145512 FREDA HARPER 61,19000 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 145513 HATCH 8 KIRK,INC. $2.090.94 MECHANICAL PARTS 145514 PL HAWN CO,INC. $30131 FILTERS 145515 HOME DEPOT 840613 HARDWARE 145516 HUGHESAIRCRAFT $01.66 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145517 HUNTINGTON SUPPLY 8134.69 HARDWARE 145518 ORANGE COUNTY FED.CREDIT UNION $68000 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 14019 ICN BIOMEDICAUS,INC. $284.85 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145520 IEEE SERVICE CENTER-C87 $91,60 PUBLICATION 146521 IPCO SAFETY $18,235,91 SAFETY SUPPLIES 145522 ISLUACONFERENCE 8525.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 145523 ITT CANNON ELECTRIC 5453.84 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145524 IMPERIALWESTCHEMICAL $46,38039 FERRIC CHLORIDE MCA 1-18-92 t45525 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $2,217.09 CONNECTORS 145528 INTEC PRODUCTS,INC. $1.702.97 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 1455V INTERSTATE ELECTRONICS CORP. WIS25 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145528 IRVINERANCHWATERDISTRICT $31.64 WATER USE 145529 J2 PRINTING SERVICES $350.19 PRINTING 145630 JAMISON ENGINEERING $11.178.12 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 145531 GREATWESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY. $1,252.84 JANITORUALSUPPLIES 145532 JT LEE INVESTMENT $26922 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145533 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $633.00 ELECTRIC PARTS 1455M JONATHAN MANUFACTURING $1.169.92 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 1455M GEORGEAJONES $389.28 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145536 KING BEARING,INC. 81,004.96 MACHINE SUPPLIES 14037 KINSSURSKY BROS.SUPPLY $218.65 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145538 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES 83,431.34 TOOLS 14SS39 KOM NAI MOBILE HOME PARK $1.215.55 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 1455W LA CUINTA MOTOR INN $206.78 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145MI LA TRONICS $323.22 TRAINING EQUIPMENT 145542 LAWICRANDAL,INC. $920.00 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.741 94 145543 FOXLAWSONSASSOC. $3.518.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES-MPRP 145SPI LEARNING TREE INTERNATIONAL $1,995.00 MANAGEMENTTRAININGREGISTRATION 145545 LEE S NO CONSULTING ENGR. $6.416.13 ENGINEERING SERVICES P140-1 145546 LA LIQUID HANDLING SYSTEMS $3,513.75 PUMP PARTS 145547 MPS $441.08 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 145US R.F.MACDONAL13 CO. $30000 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS 145549 MACOMCO $577.20 SERVICE AGREEMENT 1455W MACTEMPS 5540.00 TEMPORARY PERSONNEL 145551 MAD SYSTEMS $342.16 INSTRUMENTPARTS 145552 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS,INC. $1,502.04 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 14550 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $1,898.00 CONSTRUCTION P242-2 FUND NO 910 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE MIME PAGE4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0512SM5 POSTING DATE 0612MS WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 145564 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $210.85 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 14MSS MCKENNA ENOR.&EQUIP. $1.007.50 PUMP PARTS 14056 MEASUREMENTVARIABLES $289.02 ELECTRIC PARTS 145551 MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. 5172.34 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 145558 MICROBIAL INSIGHTS,INC. $SD0.00 CONSULTING SERVICES M.0.11-I8-92 145559 MIDWAY MFG.&MACHINING $4.180.37 PUMP PARTS 4455W MILLETT INDUSTRIES $88.20 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145561 MISSION ABRASNE SUPPLIES $135.37 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 145562 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3,796.25 UNIFORM RENTALS 145583 MIADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION $343,940.54 CONSTRUCTION 1414A 145584 MOODYS INVESTORS SERVICE $10,000.00 RATING SERVICE MAINTENANCE FEES 145565 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $70.35 SAFETY FILM RENTALS 145566 NEALSUPPLYCO. $199.60 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 145567 NEUTRON $3.507.07 ANIONIC POLYMERM.O.S-10-94 14508 NORTEL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS $8.262.00 TELEPHONE SERVICE AGREEMENT 145569 NOVA POWER,INC. 58,304.00 MECHANICAL TESTING 145570 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $452.39 SAFETY GLASSES 145571 THE OHMART CORP. $8.074.46 TRAINING REGISTRATION-GAUGE SAFETY7TECH.TRAINING 145572 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. $29.91 TRUCK PARTS 145673 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $1,85528 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 145574 ORANGE COURIER $257.30 COURIER SERVICES 14075 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. $1.074.43 FITTINGS 14078 OXYGEN SERVICE $2,177.05 SPECIALTY GASES 145577 P&D ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES $3,458.51 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY 14078 PSSI 5MAS SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION 145579 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $4,050.98 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 1455N PACIFIC PARTS $5,671.27 INSTRUMENT PARTS 145581 PACIFIC BELL $1,179.95 TELEPHONE SERVICES 145582 PACIFIC WATER CONDITIONING CO. $299.00 EQUIPMENTRENTALS 145583 PAGENET $967.49 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 1455" PALMIERI,TYLER,WIENER, $40A0 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.&12-91 145MS PARTS UNLIMITED $306.30 TRUCK PARTS 145588 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $5,700.0 REIMB.PETTY CASH,TRAINING&TRAVEL 145587 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $127,454.23 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.5&91 145586 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS $982.74 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 145589 POHLSON,MOORHEAD&GOETHALS 51,501.50 CAL-OSHA INVESTIGATION 1455M POLYMETRICS,INC. $1,W2.75 LAB SUPPLIES 145591 POLYPURE,INC. 58,860.51 CATIONIC POLYMER MG.1l 1-92 145592 POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO. $288.99 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 145593 RAROLD PRIMROSE ICE 325B.00 ICE 145594 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY $1,687.04 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145595 RBCTRANSPORTDYNAMICS $625.90 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145596 RD SYSTEMS,INC. $701.01 CARD READER REPAIRS 145597 WIN COMPUTER SERVICES,INC. $5.480.21 TRAINING REGISTRATION-CMMS TRAINING 145598 R&R INSTRUMENTS $302.77 INSTRUMENT PARTS 14559E DR.SHIVAII RAMALWGAM $228.23 LAB SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING OATS SMM5 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 06I26AI5 POSTING DATE 0WS195 WARRANT NO, VENDOR AMOUNT 145600 REISH MARINE STUDIES,INC. $720.00 OCEAN MONITORING 145601 REMEDY TEMP $3,924.98 TEMPORARY PERSONNEL SERVICES 145602 MCJUNKIW REPUBLIC SUPPLY $1.379,11 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 145603 ROMAC SUPPLY COMPANY $608]4 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 14MM RYAN-NERCO $211.41 PUMP 14MM SAFETY WEST S570A3 INSTRUMENTPARTS 14MM SANOFI BIO-INDUSTRIES $3,46445 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145607 SAWA FE PACIFIC PIPELINE $230.38 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145M SANWA BANK $14,456.38 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION-14-1-IA 145809 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS IN`L $186,484.22 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.S " 145610 R.CRAIG SCOTT S ASSOC. $3.108.58 LEGAL SERVICES-PERSONNEL ISSUES 14WII SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $59807 SPECIALTY BASES 145612 SEABIRD ELECTRONICS,INC. 3356.OD LAB SUPPLIES 145613 SEA COAST DESIGNS $988.07 OFFICE FURNITURE 145614 SHURELUCK SALES $2,838,12 TOOLSHARDWARE 14MIS SKALAR.INC. 529.79 LAB SUPPLIES 14016 SKYLINE DISPLAYS $31S4 TRAINING MATERIALS 145617 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC 5490.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 145818 M.LEE SMITH PUBLISHERS 5407.00 SUBSCRIPTION 145619 SMITH PIPE S SUPPLY $289,11 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 145620 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. 545,615.17 POWER 145NI SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $64,240 83 NATURAL GAS 145622 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. VLOU.63 DIESEWNLFADED FUEL 14W23 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER $2,83786 DRINKING WATERICOOLER RENTALS 145624 WESTALLOY,INC. $74.07 WELDING SUPPLIES 14W25 SPECIAL PLASTIC SYSTEMS,INC. $166.24 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 145625 SPEX INDUSTRIES,INC. $192.70 LAB SUPPLIES 145627 SPWECO,INC. $1,94088 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145828 STONECONTAINERCORP. $5,005.30 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 14W29 SUPELCO,INC. $154.85 IA13SUPPUES 1456M SUPERB ONE-HOUR PHOTO $12.21 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 145631 TCH ASSOCIATES $822.20 LAB SUPPLIES 145632 TAC WEST.INC. $1.210.51 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 14503 TEKDRAULICS $9.051.17 PUMP PARTS 145834 TELE-CELL,INC. $201,17 COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES 14MS TEXAS COMMERCE BANK 56,503.12 COP TRUSTEE SERVICES 1456M THOMPSON PUBLISHING GROUP $20T00 PUBLICATION 145537 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $728.85 MECHANICAL PARTS 14508 TONrS LOCKS SAFE SERVICE $199.35 LOCKS S KEYS 145839 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES $2.503.50 TRAVEL SERVICES M.O.B&94 14%K) TRIPLE M PACKING $8,192,27 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145641 TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY,INC. $4,156,88 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.O.5-11-W 145642 TRUCK S AUTO SUPPLY,INC. 5685.89 TRUCK PARTS 145643 TRUESDAILLASS $99.00 LAB SERVICES 145844 JG TUCKER S SON,INC. 5271.84 FILTERS 145545 U.S.C.SPONSORED PROJECTS ACCT. 514,396.09 TECHNICAL SERVICES FUNDING 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 621195 PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0628195 POSTING DATE 0628195 WARRANT NO. VENDOR 145645 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $153.00 LAB SUPPLIES 145647 UNIS0URCE8/0R BUTLER PAPER $9,126.31 OFFICE SUPPLIES 145648 MNR SCIENTIFIC 54,057.33 LAB SUPPLIES 145649 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $5.760.12 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 14W50 VALLEY CREST LANDSCAPE,INC. $2.024.00 LANDSCAPING EQUIPMENT 14MI VALLEY VIEW SHOPPING CENTER $235.11 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 14MU VARIAN ASSOCIATES,INC. 5730.85 LAB SUPPLIES 145853 WEFTEC 195 5860.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION-WEF ANNUAL CONF. 1455M WALKER CUSTOM POWDER COATING $232.16 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145655 GUY L.WARDEN 6 SONS $1,082.02 ENGINE PARTS 145656 WAXIE 9380.94 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 145657 WEBBER AIRCRAFT,INC. $3.191.00 REFUNDUSERFEEOVERPAYMENT 145658 WESTAMERICAN RUBBER CO. $2.518.36 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145659 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $34,716.02 CAUSTIC SODA&HYPOCHLORIDE M.0.9.12-9254-13.94 145660 MST41TE SUPPLY CO. 54.494.58 ELECTRICSUPPLIES 14WGI WESCO $3,509.35 INSTRUMENTSUPPLIES 145662 WILLAMETTE INDUSTRIES,INC. $247.21 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145883 WILLOWICK ROYAL MOBILEHOME $1.281.17 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145660 WITEG $162.43 LAB SUPPLIES 146665 XEROX CORP. $7,504.72 COPIER LEASES 145866 GEORGEYARDLEYCO. $1,020.19 LAB SUPPLIES 145667 RICHARD B.EDGAR 5200.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 51,865,133.OB L FUNDING 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINO DATE fiQ1A15 PAGE T REPORT NUMBER M43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 08/16195 POSTING DATE O(InSM5 SUMMARY AMOUNT 01 OPER FUND SS78.83 01 C0NSTR.FUND $951.00 02 OPER FUND 2,467.88 02 CAP FAC FUND 3,458.51 02 CONSTR.FUND 3,2112.50 03 OPEN FUND 10,979.03 03 CAP FAC FUND 388,000.89 03 CONSTR.FUND 2,775.00 05 OPER FUND 5,166.35 05 CONSTR.FUND 870.50 08 OPER FUND 236.01 08 CAP FAC FUND 606.00 68 CONSTR.FUND 538.50 07 OPER FUND 12,258.26 07 CAP FAC FUND 8.745.72 07 CONSTR.FUND 895.50 011 OPEN FUND 2,402.82 011 CAP FAC FUND 89,335.42 011 CONSTR.FUND 887.00 014 OFER FUND 15.24 014 CAP FAC FUND 359,356.92 0588 CAP FAC FUND 692.93 0887 OPEN FUND 211.12 01814 OPER FUND 786.58 J OPER FUND 615,471.95 CORF 78,756.59 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND 41,882.03 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL 295,664.00 1,M,133.09 FUND NO SIN - fT DIST WORKINGCAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7,0195 PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07IIMS POSTING DATE 07N20% WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 145731 ABS SERVICE CO. $4,6 0.94 MACHINE REPAIRS 145732 AFCEA INTERNATIONAL HDORTS. $280.00 COMPUTER TRAINING REGISTRATION 1457M AG TECH COMPANY $73,345.83 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-81 1457M AGX CORPORATION $1,308.54 GAUGE 1457M AT&T-PROWATTS 92,560.76 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 145M AT&T-MEGACOM SERVICE N67.W LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 145737 AT&T-UNIPLAN SERVICE $36.71 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 145738 ACTION DOOR REPAIR CORP. 3587.84 DOOR REPAIRS 145739 ADVANCED WELDER REPAIR $358.06 WELDER REPAIRS 145740 AIR COLA SUPPLY,INC. 8164.51 AIR CONDITIONER PARTS 146741 ALLOY DIE CASTING &82.58 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145742 ALPHAOMEGA $373.92 LAB REPAIRS 145743 AMERIDATA $441.69 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 145740 AMERICAN SIGMA $2,145.38 SAMPLER PARTS 145745 SLAKE P.ANDERSON $151.24 REIMBURSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE 145746 ANDITER-DISTRIBUTION $205.45 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 145747 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $1.733.33 NOTICES&ADS 146748 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $503.20 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 145749 ARMOR-VAC $1,140.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 145750 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. $105.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL 145751 ASSOCIATED CONCRETE PRODUCTS &110.98 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 145752 RANDOLPH AUSTIN CO. 883396 LAB SUPPLIES 145753 AWARDS TROPHIES $25.27 PLAQUES 1457M BFI MEDICAL WASTE SYSTEMS $43.90 WASTE DISPOSAL 145755 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $430.27 BATTERIES 1467M BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS.INC. $3,587.90 LAB SUPPLIES 145757 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. 5250.05 TRUCK WASH TICKETS 145768 BISHOP COMPANY $839.17 TOOLS 145759 BLOOMBERG L.P. $4.832.59 FINANCIAL MONITORING M.0.4-14-93 M760 BOOT BARN &123.80 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 145761 SURKE ENGINEERING CO. 9586.17 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 145702 C.L.TECHNOLOGY $720.00 GAS ANALYSIS SERVICES M763 CS COMPANY $1,412.24 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 145M CAUFORNIAAUTOMATICGATE $424.06 SERVICEAGREEMENT 145766 CALLAN ASSOCIATES,INC. 325,000.00 INVESTMENT ADVISOR SEARCH M.0.24495 145766 CANUSCORPORATION $1,057.24 FIBER OPTIC CABLE 145767 30HN D.CASE ASSOC. $2,438.22 CONSULTING SERVICES 145768 CENTURY SAFETY INST.&SUPPLY $1,593.60 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 145780 CHEM SEARCH $502.33 PIPING PARTS 145770 COASTRUBBERSTAMP 651.72 OFFICE SUPPLIES 145771 COSTAL VIDEO COMMUNICATION &100.55 SAFETY FILM RENTALS 145772 COMPUSA,INC. $132.11 COMPUTERSOFTWARE 145773 COMPUSERVE $354.14 COMPUTER SERVICES 145774 CONSOLIDATED REPOGRAPHICS W9.13 PRINTING SERVICES 10775 CONSUMER PIPE $1.468.51 PLUMBINGSUPPUES 145776 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC. 5735.48 TOOLS C FUNDNO 9199 - M DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7105195 PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07112MS POSTING DATE 0711W5 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 145777 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO. 8670.00 CHLORINE M.0.10-11-93 145T78 CONTROL CONCEPTS CORP. $501.83 ELECTRIC PARTS 145779 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS O C 51,360.65 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SERVICES M.O.9.11.03 145790 COUNTERPARTENTERPRISES $539.84 MECHANICAL PARTS 145751 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $898.72 ELECTRIC PARTS 1457V CHARLES P.CROWLEY,GO. $616.60 PUMP PARTS 14570 DOUGLAS J.DAVIS 6 ASSOC.,INC. 83,000.00 SAFETY EVALUATION SERVICES 145764 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIF. 838,154.02 DENTAL INSURANCE PLAN M.O.1-12.94 145785 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $1.329.92 SERVICEAGREEMENT 145708 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY 8940.00 ELEVATORMAINTENANCE 1457U ROBERT F.DRWER ASSOC. 821,682A0 PERSONNEL INSURANCE CONSULTANT 145788 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. 82,022.W PAINT SUPPLIES 145709 ESP NORTH $1.981 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 14579D EASTMAN,INC. 85,547.03 OFFICE SUPPLIES 145791 EOOMM.YSIS,INC, $1,028.50 CONSULTING SERVICES 145792 ELECTRO TEST,INC. 89,990.00 METER 145793 EMERGENCY MGMT NETWORK $001.73 SAFETY SUPPLIES 1457" ENCHANTER,INC. 81,680.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.B-10�92 145795 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $760.50 LAB SERVICES 1457M ERNST9YOUNG $58,874.0D FINANCE S TECH.SERVICES REVIEWS M.O.9.1494 145797 EVENTUSSOFTWARE 81,777.10 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 145798 FLUID TECH.SALES S01736 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 107N FNWVALVECOMPANY 8959.49 VALVES 1458W PET SAND AND GRAVEL.INC. 8168.39 ROAD BASE MATERIALS 145801 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $7,972.50 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-011 1458D2 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $339.10 AIR FREIGHT 145803 FIBERTRON 8098.44 FIBER OPTIC CABLE 1458M FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. 33.51 LABSUPPLIES 145605 FISIONS INSTRUMENTS $41.05 LAB SUPPLIES 1458M FLICKINGER CO. 8W'MI VALVES 14H07 PLO-SYSTEMS INC. $38,246.82 PUMP PARTS 146808 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $38.40 PHOTO SUPPLIES 145809 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $321.23 PAINTSUPPLIES 145510 FRYS ELECTRONICS $472.98 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 146811 GST,INC. $2.680.81 OFFICE SUPPLIES 145812 CITY OF GARDEN GROVE 82,11XIM MANHOLEADJUSTING 146913 GENERAL BINDING CORP. $1,725.14 OFFICE SUPPLIES 145914 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. SBS8.53 ELECTRIC PARTS 145015 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1,049.07 TELEPHONE SERVICES 145816 GIERLICH-MITCHELL,INC. $1,612.93 PUMP PARTS 145817 GOVT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOC. $1,260.00 PUBLICATIONS 145018 WWGRAINGER,INC. $924.79 HARDWARE 145819 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $1.466.95 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 1458M GRASBY S.T.I. $3.357.99 ENGINE PARTS 145821 DAVID R.GRIFFIN 8110,448.45 LEGAL SERVICES-TECHRE PIPE M.O.9.1494 14SIM HATCH 9 KIRK,INC. $757.63 MECHANICAL PARTS FUNDNO 9I9 - f DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DAIS 7MSMS PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMSPA1D07H2185 POSTING DATE 07112195 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 145823 PL HAWN CO,INC. $607.62 FILTERS 14024 HELPMATES PERSONNEL SERVICES $819.34 TEMPORARY PERSONNEL SERVICES 145825 HEWLETT PACKARD CO. 3144.39 LAB SUPPLIES 145826 HILT,INC. E1,196.04 TOOLS 145027 HOME DEPOT $437.21 HARDWARE 145828 PIS HUGHES CO,INC. $96.95 HARDWARE 145829 CITYOFHUNTINGTONBIACH $15.792.75 WATER USE 145830 HUNTINGTON SUPPLY $24.24 HARDWARE 145831 HYCLONE LABORATORIES,INC. 5555.08 LAB SUPPLIES 145832 IPCOSAFETY $1,418.44 SAFETY SUPPLIES 14503 IMAGING PLUS,INC. $685.53 OFFICE SUPPLIES 145834 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL S0.842.33 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11.18.02 145835 INDUSTRIAL SAFETY SHOE CO. $3,381.97 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 145838 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $136.12 CONNECTORS 145837 INT'L HOUSE OF PANCAKES 39 $128.69 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145838 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $1.159.45 BATTERIES 145879 INTERSPIRO $912.42 SAFETY SUPPLIES 145840 IRVINE PHOTO GRAPHICS 527.06 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 145841 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $5.54 WATER USE 146842 JIT COMPUTER SOURCE,INC. S2.U18.BB OFFICE EQUIPMENT 145M JAMISON ENGINEERING $4.551.33 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 145W GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY. $788.27 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 14SUS JOBS AVAILABLE 3220.00 NOTICES&ADS 145846 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $870.21 ELECTRIC PARTS 145847 KIMMERLE BRCS.INC. $765.72 PUMP 14WB KING BEARING,INC. $1,453.03 MACHINE SUPPLIES 145849 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $1.070.30 TOOLS 145850 L A CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $915.80 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES 145851 LATRONICS $014.11 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT 145852 LAIDLAW ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES $15,957.55 WASTE DISPOSAL SERVICES 145853 LEHMAN BROTHERS,INC. $129,306.30 TCCPINTERESTM.O.14-94 145854 LOSANGELESTIMES $170.20 SUBSCRIPTION 14WSS NBC APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL $972.05 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6-10.92 145858 MPS $93.75 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 145857 MACTEMPS $360,00 TEMPORARY PERSONNEL SERVICES 145858 MAD SYSTEMS $647.27 INSIRUMENTSUPPLIES 145859 MAGNETEK $3.318.82 ELECTRIC METER 145860 MANLEY'S BOILER REPAIR CO,INC. $325.00 BOILER CLEANING 145MI MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $500.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 145M MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $167,078.00 CONSTRUCTION MA24 145863 MARIE CALIANDERS PIES"I $135A0 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145864 MARVACDOWELECTRONICS $235.35 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 145865 MCCOY SHEET METAL WORKS,INC. $172.40 FITTINGS 1458E6 MIDWAY MFG.&MACHINING P83.55 PUMP PARTS 145887 MISSION INDUSTRIES 53,24UA0 UNIFORM RENTALS 145888 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO. 5190.00 ELECTRIC PARTS FUNDNO 910 - IT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7MMS PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CINMS PAID 07/12/95 POSTING DATE 07/12/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 145689 MORELAND S ASSOCIATES $9,977.50 FINANCIAL AUDIT SERVICES M.O.3 95 145870 MOTOROIA,INC. $372.04 INSTRUMENT PARTS 145871 MAT WEST MARKETS $750.00 C.O.P.LIQUIDITY FEES 145572 NATIONAL ENVIRO.INFO,SERV. $181.50 LAB SUPPLIES 145873 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $1,944.08 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 145874 NEUTRON $7.024.40 ANIONIC POLYMER M.O.S-I -N 145875 NEW HORIZONS COMPUTER CENTER $2,000.00 COMPUTER TRAINING REGISTRATION 145876 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $36.90 WATER USE 145877 CUMMINS CAL FACA3NAN $190.74 ELECTRIC PARTS 145676 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $7,139.38 ELECTRIC PARTS 145879 ORANGE COURIER $152.55 COURIER SERVICES 145880 ORANGE VALVE 8 FITTING CO. 51,188.09 FITTINGS 145881 OXYGEN SERVICE $1.555.70 SPECIALTY OASES 145882 PSSI $2.325.15 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION 145883 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY 5840.11 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 145W PACIFIC PARTS $31,465.31 FIBER OPTIC EQUIPMENT 145885 PACIFIC BELL 548.79 TELEPHONE SERVICES 145888 NORTEL COMMUNICATIONS SYST. $1.061 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS 145887 PALLETS B ACCESSORIES CO. $1,544.08 WAREHOUSE SUPPUES 14SUS PARAGON CAJOLE 338.78 CABLE SERVICES 145889 PARKHOUSE TIRE CO. $191.86 TRUCK PARTS 145880 PASCAL B LUDWIG $22,254.00 CONSTRUCTION P1428 MAO 145691 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $12,018.51 REIMB.PETTY CASH,TRAINING B TRAVEL 145892 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $279,074.40 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.54591 145893 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS $23,252.48 CMAS COMPUTER HAROWAREISOFTWARE 1458M POLYPURE,INC. $17.987.19 CATIONIC POLYMER M.OS11A2 145895 POSTMASTER $172.00 POST OFFICE BOX RENTAL 145896 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $98.00 ICE 145897 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE IND. $4,412A0 SOIL TESTING 145898 PULSAFEEDER S482b3 PUMP PARTS 145899 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $103,M ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS 145900 R 8 R INSTRUMENTS 5347.01 INSTRUMENT PARTS 145MI DR.SHIVAJI RAMALINGAM $22823 LAB SUPPLIES 145902 REBIS 311.871AS OFFICE EQUIPMENT 145903 REMEDY TEMP $75,1AD TEMPORARY PERSONNEL SERVICES 1459M MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $74.90 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 145M RMMEASUREMENTANDCONTROL $9,889.80 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 145M SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS $1,22530 ELECTRIC PARTS 145907 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $90,45 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 145M SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. 51,103.38 SPECIALTY GASES 145909 SEA SYSTEMS 31,040.00 CURRENT METER STUDY 145910 SEWER EQUIP CO.OF AMERICA $1.263.37 TOOLS 145911 SNURELUCK SALES $11,987.39 TOOLSHARDWARE 145912 SIGMACHEMICALCO. $130.39 LAB SUPPLIES 145913 THE SMITH GROUP $9,958.20 TECHNICAL SERVICES STUDY 145914 SMITH PIPE B SUPPLY INC. $128.44 PLUMBING SUPPLIES FUNONO 91M - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7105195 PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07/12/95 POSTINGDATE0WIMS WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 145915 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. 553.M7.74 POWER 145916 SO.CALIF.WATER CO. $42.23 WATER USE 145917 SOUTHERNCOUNTIESOILCO. $489,21 DIESELAINLEADED FUEL 145918 SPARKLETTSDRINKINGWATER $13.50 DRINKING WATERICOOLER RENTALS 145919 SPARLING INSTRUMENT CO..INC. $260.00 METER 14592D SUMMITSTEEL $909.97 METAL 145921 SUNSET FORD $116.35 TRUCK PARTS 145922 SUPELCO,INC. $101.19 LAB SUPPLIES 145923 TARGET $200.27 GROUNDSKEEPING SUPPLIES 145924 TEXMATE,INC. $189.14 INSTRUMENT PARTS 145925 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $240.26 MECHANICAL PARTS 145926 EUMBETH KYLE THOMPSON $602.85 LIABILITY CLAIM 145927 TONER SYSTEM INTERNATIONAL $1,620.55 PRINTING SUPPLIES 145928 TONYS LOCK 8 SAFE SERVICE $96.82 LOCKS 8 KEYS 145929 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES $2.121.60 TRAVEL SERVICES M.0.64F94 145930 TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY,INC. 13,973.84 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.O.5-11.94 145931 TRUCK B AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $11480.67 TRUCK PARTS 145932 TRUESDAILLABS $3,245.55 LAB SERVICES 145ST3 JG TUCKER B SON.INC. 1202.15 INSTRUMENTPARTS 1459M TUSTIN DODGE 123.64 TRUCK PARTS 145935 ULTRASCIEN7IFIC $197.00 LAB SUPPLIES 145938 UNDERSEA GRAPHICS,INC. S14.O0O.9O OUTFALLREPAIRS 145937 UNISOURCEIVOR BUTLER PAPER 1450.20 OFFICE SUPPLIES I45NO UNITED PARCELSERVICE 11,083.60 PARCEL SERVICES 145939 VWR SCIENTIFIC 1104.09 LAB SUPPLIES 145840 VERTEX COMPUTER CABLE PRODUCTS $1,00.19 FIBER OPTIC CABLE 145MI VILLAGE NURSERIES $69.62 LANDSCAPINGSUPPLIES 145942 CARL WARREN B CO. $1.289.70 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR 145943 WAXIE 12,661.96 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 145W WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $30.357.15 CAUSTIC SODA B HYPOCHLORIDE M.0.8-12-9284l}94 145945 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $171.33 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 145M WESCO $840.45 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 145947 WTTEG 1291.76 LAB SUPPLIES 145948 ROURKE,WOODRUFF B SPRNGUN 168.541.04 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.2-M92 145949 XEROX CORP. 5759.64 COPIER LEASES 145950 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $831.21 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 145951 YORBA ORANGE GROWERS ASSOC. $11686.38 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 0711 MIS $1,640,228.19 FUNDNO 91M - JT DIV WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 71OMS PAGES REPORT NUMBERAP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07112MS POSTING DATE 0WIMS SUMMARY AMOUNT 21 CONSTR FUND $89.45 02 OPER FUND 2.878.67 02 CAP FAC FUND 298.54 42 CONSTR FUND 1911,88 03 OPER FUND 31,505.08 03 CAP FAC FUND 137,MA5 03 CONSTR FUND 212,78 05 OPER FUND 4,547.37 N5 CONSTR FUND 83.80 NB CONSTR FUND SI M N7 OPER FUND 8,170.84 07 CONSTR FUND 73.58 Nil OPER FUND 626.31 Nt 1 CAP FAC FUND 1,909.00 N11 CONSTR FUND 84.28 N13OONSTRFUND 2.55 014 CAP FAC FUND 32.00 014 CONSTR FUND 14.98 N488 OPER FUND 2,383A4 N7&14 OPER FUND 20,543.13 JT OPER FUND 938,231.88 CORF 287.789.41 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND 71,739.57 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL 134,SS7.38 Si,840,228.19 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING JULY 26, 1995 Agenda Item (10)(a): Consideration of Resolution No. 95- 77 , awarding contract for the Purchase of Anionic Polyelectrolyte Chemical Polymer, Specification No. C-035, to Polypure, Inc., for the price of $1.69 per pound, plus sales tax, for a one-year period beginning September 1, 1995, with option for four one-year extensions (estimated annual cost $161,699.20, plus sales tax). Summary Anionic polymer is used as a chemical coagulant, along with ferric chloride, in the advanced primary treatment of wastewater. Advanced primary treatment enhances the treatment efficiency and controls hydrogen sulfide in the anaerobic digestion of sludge. Advanced primary treatment is cost-effective means of removing solids and biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) from the wastewater and,thus, aids in meeting the NPDES ocean discharge limits. It also reduces digester gas hydrogen sulfide levels. The current contract for supplying polymer is expiring and bids for a new contract have been solicited. Six chemical suppliers were pre-qualified by laboratory testing. The polymer sample provided by the suppliers for trial and pre-qualification must exactly match the respective polymer proposed by the bidders for use under the purchase contract specifications. Laboratory testing established each project's performance characteristics, which were used by staff to determine bid quantities of polymer to be supplied. Based on the above requirements, four bids were received. The low bid was $161,699.20, and the high bid was $344,107,67 for annual usage of anionic polymer. The estimated total annual cost of anionic polymer for physical/chemical treatment is approximately 29% lower than the current contract. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends award of contract to Polypure, Inc., the lowest responsible bidder, for the Purchase of Anionic Polyelectrolyte Chemical Polymer, Specification No. C-035, for the price of$1.69 per pound, plus sales tax, for a one-year period, with provisions for four (4) one-year extensions. Based on an annual usage of 95,680 gallons, the estimated delivered cost is $161,699.20, plus sales tax. FiW PDIXMGF133 BS ,Vf COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS June 29, 1995 of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1 fi EW6 AVENUE MEMORANDUM Po.Bolt a," `d N WMN vnuEr,caurcAMA 9272"127 TO: Donald F. McIntyre O1A16923AH FROM: Katherine Yarosh, Senior Buyer SUBJECT: PURCHASE OF ANIONIC POLYELECTROLYTE CHEMICAL POLYMER SPECIFICATION NO. C-035 Sealed bids were opened Tuesday,June 27, 1995,for the purchase and delivery of Anionic Polyelectrolyte Chemical Polymer for a one-year period beginning September 1, 1995. Tabulation of bids is as follows: SUPPLIER PRODUCT NO. ESTIMATED COST PER ESTIMATED OTY.(Las.) ACTIVE LB. ANNUAL COST POLYPURE INC. CLARIFLOC 485 95,680 $1.69 $161.699.20 NEUTRON PRODUCTS,INC. PHOTOFLOC 141,294 $1.80 $254,31120 1100 DATED ENVIRONMENTAL 195 173.476 $1.60 $312.256.80 ROCHESTER MIDLAND CORP. MIDFLOC 126.9T/ $2.71 $407.142.64 PW1319E CYTEC INDUSTRIES,INC. NO-BID SECODYNE,INCORPORATED NO-BID RAJ SAN JOAQUIN CHEMICALS,INC. NO-BID STOCKHAUSEN,INC. NO-BID WESTERN STATES NO-SID Staff recommends the award be made to Polypure, Inc., the lowest responsible bidder, for a one-year contract period starting September 1, 1995. The total estimated annual delivered price of $161,699.20, plus sales tax, is based on furnishing 95,680 pounds of polymer at a unit price of$1.69 per active pound. ProvissiTio11ns are In the specifications for four consecutive one-year contract extensions. O Katherine Yarosh Senior Buyer We ha a ourNh the 09ve recommendation: Ted H fman Purchasing Manager �q� �7 / 1/IM4. �...i Gary G. S ed Robes.Oot Director ofFinance Assistant Director of Operations a�wroocaeloWlFcrosm JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING JULY 26, 1995 Agenda Item (10)(b): Consideration of motion authorizing membership in the Southern California Alliance of Publicly Owned Treatment Works (SCAP) for the 1995-96 fiscal year. Summary The Southern California Alliance of Publicly Owned Treatment Works (SCAP) is an organization comprised of both cities and special districts engaged in providing sewerage services in the seven counties that make up Southern California. Its primary purpose is to prepare information and testimony and to present a unified position to state, regional and local regulatory authorities in support of factually and scientifically- based, technically-sound, cost-effective regulatory requirements that balance the protection of the environment with the economic viability of our communities. The bottom line is to lobby for pragmatic regulations that make rational technical and/or economic sense, potentially saving POTWs millions of dollars; and, if necessary, to initiate legal action towards those ends. SCAP is similar to an organization in Northern California called Bay Area Dischargers Association (BADA). Originally, the Southern California POTWs were asked to join with BADA in a state-wide organization. However, it was determined that there were enough significant differences in regulatory issues that separate groups would be more effective; although the two groups coordinate on selected issues when appropriate. The annual membership fees are $24,000. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of membership in SSCAP for the 1995-96 fiscal year.. J:WWPDCCWs M07-10s.wPD Y w JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS ` REGULAR MEETING .r JULY 26,1995 DISTRICT 2 Agenda Item(10)(C) : Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-R1, authorizing an addition of$98,030.23 to the contract with Colich Bros., dba Colich & Sons, for four items of additional or deleted work and 8 calendar day time extension. Summary In April 1994, the Directors approved the plans and specifications for Contract No. 2-9-R1, Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer from Imperial Highway west of Kraemer Boulevard to the intersection of Yorba Linda Boulevard and Associated Road. This sewer is used to transport wastewater collected from the collection system of the City of Fullerton to Treatment Plant No. 1. The $2.9 million project consists of a new 18-inch ductile iron pipe (DIP), 18-inch vitrified day pipe (VCP) 21-inch VCP, 24-inch VCP, 36-inch VCP and 39-inch VCP gravity sewer. The alignment starts at Yorba Linda Boulevard and Associated Road, continues northerly in Associated Road to the intersection of Associated Road and Bastanchury Road, turns easterly in Bastanchury Road to a point west of 1-57 where it enters the Parkside Apartments complex. The sewer will be installed in an easement heading north, then turning east and connecting to an existing dry sewer under 1-57. The alignment continues on the east side of 1-57 entering a second easement located on private property. The alignment continues easterly in Eucalyptus Street and Gilman Park to a point of connection to the existing subtrunk sewer. Work consists of the construction of laterals, manholes, service connections, temporary bypass lines and restoration of damaged landscape. The changes are caused by revising bypass pumping plans and undisclosed interfering utility conditions. Change Order No. 1 is a net addition of$98,030.23 to the contract for four items of added work and 8 calendar days. This project was designed by Post, Buckley, Schuh and Jennigan (formerly Church Engineering, Inc.) and awarded to Colich Bros., Inc. dba Colich &Sons in June 1994. The following is a summary of the contract amount: Original Contract Amount $2,482,762.00 Previously Approved Changes $ 0.00 This Change (Add)(Deduet) $ 98,030.23 Amended Contract Amount $2,580,792.23 Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 1 for an addition of$98,030.23 and 8 calendar day time extension to the contract with Colich Bros., Inc. dba Colich & Sons. �' JIWPD0CW%G9S07-10C.WP0 v COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS y M ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA July 26, 1995 19SAA EWS AVENUE aa.BOX ere) FOUMA1N VALLEY.OALIiONNIA 92728A127 n1o99L2A11 STAFF REPORT DISTRICT 2 APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION OF CYPRESS AVENUE SUBTRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 2-9-Rl Summary In April 1994, the Directors approved the plans and specifications for Contract No. 2-9-R1, Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer from Imperial Highway west of Kraemer Boulevard to the intersection of Yorba Linda Boulevard and Associated Road. This sewer is used to transport wastewater collected from the collection system of the City of Fullerton to Treatment Plant No. 1. The $2.9 million project consists of a new 18-inch ductile iron pipe (DIP), 18-inch vitrified clay pipe (VCP) 21-inch VCP, 24-inch VCP, 36-inch VCP and 39-inch VCP gravity sewer. The alignment starts at Yorba Linda Boulevard and Associated Road, continues northerly in Associated Road to the intersection of Associated Road and Bastanchury Road, turns easterly in Bastanchury Road to a point west of 1-57 where it enters the Parkside Apartments complex. The sewer will be installed in an easement heading north, then turning east and connecting to an existing dry sewer under 1-57. The alignment continues on the east side of 1-57 entering a second easement located on private property. The alignment continues easterly in Eucalyptus Street and Gilman Park to a point of connection to the existing subtrunk sewer. Work consists of the construction of laterals, manholes, service connections, temporary bypass lines and restoration of damaged landscape. The changes are caused by revising bypass pumping plans and undisclosed interfering utility conditions. Change Order No. 1 is a net addition of $98,030.23 to the contract for four items of added work and 8 calendar days. This project was designed by Post, Buckley, Schuh and Jennigan (formerly Church Engineering, Inc.) and awarded to Colich Bros., Inc. dba Colich & Sons in June 1994. Item 1, in the amount of$75,193.14 and 5 calendar days, represents costs incurred to revise the bypass pumping procedures that were required to construct a new diversion structure, manhole and remove two existing manholes. It was discovered the existing sewer line that was proposed to take the flow from two sewer lines was not adequate and an alternate line in close proximity would be utilized. This revision created the need yam, for two additional bypass systems, addition of a 72-inch manhole, additional piping, P larger than anticipated excavation, changed shoring undisclosed concrete obstructions, existing sewer line not located as per drawings, greater thicknesses of asphalt paving than expected, weekend overtime. Premium work at direction of City and the deletion of a diversion structure and manhole (full credit received from Contractor). Item 2, in the amount of $1,530.00, was the substitution of 310 feet of 39-inch DIP for VCP due to an interference of a storm drain. The thinner wall of the DIP allowed sufficient clearance for the placement of the sewer line. Item 3, in the amount of$8,437.96 and 3 calendar days, represents costs encountering various undisclosed utilities including water lines and a concrete encased sewer line. Item 4, in the amount of$12,869.13 is the cost of encountering undisclosed abandoned underground steel shoring which had to be partially removed and encountering a misplaced telephone cable which was not as shown in the contract drawings. If the Directors approve this change order, the total cost of the change orders to date on this contract will be $98,030.23. This represents an increase of 3.95% over the original contract amount. The changes above would have been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase. No additional costs were incurred over-and- above what would have been had the conditions been shown in the original contract drawings. Staff Recommendation .. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 1 for an addition of$98,030.23 and 8 calendar day time extension to the contract with Colich Bros., Inc. dba Colich & Sons. DC:jac ENGWGRRPTMR07-01.95 9 Page 1 of 5 �...i COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Colich Bros. Inc. dba Colich & Sons C.O. No.: One (1) Date: July 26, 1995 Job: Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-Rl Consultant: Post Buckley Schuh and Jenniean (formerly Church Enoineerine Inc.) Amount of this Change Order (Add)(Deduel) $ 98,030.23 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor,the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM t -REVISION OF BYPASS PUMPING In the intersection of Associated Road and Yorba Uncle Boulevard,the contract documents specified that existing 844nch diameter and a 72-inch diameter manholes be removed and an 8'x 14'diversion structure and a new 84-inch manhole be installed. Also,there was an wasting 24-inch and 184nch sewer line running parallel down Associated Road that intersected these two manholes. The abandonment of existing and constructing new facilities required the bypass pumping or diverting flows into the 244nch line. That 24-inch line reduces to a der/ 18-inch line downstream. By measuring flows in the 244nch line,it was determined that R did not have the capacity to accept the additional flow from the 18-inch line. Therefore,the initially designed procedure was abandoned and the flow from the 184nch line was diverted to a second,adjacent 24-inch line that fed into the Yorba Linda Pump Station. Maintaining these flows required two additional bypass systems,both of greater difficultly than originally anticipated,the deletion of the 8'x 14'diversion structure with full credit received from Contractor,the addition of a 72inch manhole and additional piping. The 724rch manhole was placed on a common base with the Wnch manhole and because the 244nch sewer lines must remain in service throughout the excavation operations a larger excavation was needed. The larger excavation required additional shoring requirements. Other costs involved additional concrete in the manhole bases, additional temporary plugs The 24-inch sewer was 4 feet farther than located on plans causing more excavations, and undisclosed reinforced concrete pipe removed,asphalt paving three times thicker than shown on plans and overtime on weekends as prescribed by the City of Fullerton. This item of work was performed on a negotiated basis in accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6(B)2(a). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $75,193.14 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 5 Calendar Days ITEM 2-SUBSTITUTION OF SEWER PIPE TYPE During the"potholing"operation prior to the placing of the 39-inch sewer line on Associated Road,it was noted that the bottom of two exsting storm drains(30-inch and 48-inch) at Station 7+60 would interfere with the crown on the new 39-inch vitrified clay pipe (VCP)sewer line. This is considered a changed condition. The Contractor was directed to substitute the 39-inch VCP with 36-inch ductile iron pipe(DIP) between manholes at Stations 5+32 and 8+42. This allowed the clearance needed to pass under the storm drains. The additional cost is for the difference in the more expensive ductile iron pipe. This Rem of work was performed on a force account basis in accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6(B)2(b). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $1,530.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days 0 Page 2 of 5 y COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Colich Bros. Inc. dba Colich 8. Sons C.O. No.: One (1) Dale: July 26. 1995 Job: Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-Rl Consultant: Post, Buckley Schuh and Jenninan (formerly Church Enaineerina. Inc.) ITEM 3-UNDISCLOSED UTILITIES The Contractor encountered various underground utilities not shown on the contract drawings while excavating and placing the new 364nch,21-inch,and 184nch sewer. These utilities were not disclosed to the consultant during the design of the proect except as noted In No. 3. 1. Encountered a 104nch asbestos cement pipe(ACP)at Station 14+42 in Associated Road near Bastanchury Road. This unknown utility was in direct conflict with the 36-inch VCP. Cost of this Rem: $1.797.42 2. During the excavating operation for a bore pit at Station 57+99 at Gilman Park,the Contractor encountered a 1%-inch and 11/.4nch irrigation (water)line,a 24nch water service line and a 4-inch water line. The bore pit was required in order to"micro-tunnel"under Gilman Park in order to reduce damage to the park and the various water lines were not known to be present. Cost of this Rem: $2,494.19 3. Encountered an 8-inch concrete encased sewer line at Station 28+72 on Bastanchury Road at Derek Drive. The sewer line was known to be present but there was no indication R would be concrete encased. Additional equipment and time were required to remove the concrete before the sewer line could be connected into a new manhole. Cost of this item: $2,425.52 4. During the excavating of a receiving pit for the micro-tunneling operation at Station 62+50 in Gilman Park,the Contractor encountered a 1-inch and a 21/.4nch irrigation (water) line and a valve box not shown on the contract drawings. Cost of this Rem: $1,720.83 This work was performed on a force account basis in accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6(B)2(b). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER REM: $8,437.96 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 3 Calendar Days s 4 Page 3 of 5 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Colich Bros. Inc. dba Colich & Sons C.O. No.: One (1) Date: Jul v 26, 1995 Job: Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-R1 Consultant: Post Buckley Schuh and Jenniaan (formerly Church Enoineerina. Inc.) CONTRACT NO.2-36 ITEM 4-UNDISCLOSED UNDERGROUND OBSTRUCTION AND MISPLACED UTILITY The Contractor was required to place a 130-foot reinforced concrete encasement around the existing 39-inch VCP sewer line at Station 1232+00 at the Green River Golf Course. This line passes under the AT&SF railroad tracks. The concrete encasement Is for the protection of the sewer line due to the future addition of a parallel track for the AT&SF commuter line. During the excavation operation,an undisclosed underground obstruction was struck and found to be an extension of the steel beam and plate shield shoring system left in the ground from the previous pipe jacking encasement under the existing tracks. This caused considerable delay and hand digging. Also,a U.S.Sprint utility tine in a 44nch conduit was known to be running parallel to and on the south side of the railroad track, but was not to cross the area of excavation for the sewer line. The U.S.Sprint line did in fact cross the excavation causing additional delay in working around and protecting the utility. This hem of work was performed on a force account basis in accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6(B)2(b). Staff will attempt to recover these costs from the AT&SF Commuter Rail Development Board and SAWPA. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $12,869.13 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $98,030.23 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 8 Calendar Days r Page 4 of 5 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY U 108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Colich Bros. Inc. dba Colich&Sons C.O. No.: One (1) Date: July 26, 1995 Job: Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-Rl Consultant: Post. Buckley. Schuh and Jennigan (formerly Church Engineering, Inc.) The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 8 days extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approve by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: June 30, 1994 Original Contract Time: 180 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: December 27, 1994 Time Extension this C.O.: 6 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 8 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 188 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: July 3, 1995 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Original Contract Price $2,482,762.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 0.00 This Change (Add) (Pedeet) $ 98,030.23 Amended Contract Price $2,580,792.23 C Page 5 of 5 `...� COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728.8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Colich Bros. Inc. dba Colich &Sons C.O. No.: One (1) Date: July 26, 1995 Job: Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer. Contract No. 2-9-R1 Consultant: Post, Buckley Schuh and Jenniaan (formerly Church Enaineerina. Inc.) Board Authorization Date: July 26, 1995 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Submitted by =ecom %11E ✓�� 9s Gl3%s' ngineering Manager Date Construction Ma a Date Appr d by: p vad as to Fo m r' 95 Dir for of Engineering Dale enera Counsel Date Accepted by: COLICH BROS., INC. dba Colich & Sons Contractor ate v JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING JULY 26, 1995 DISTRICTS 3 & 11 Agenda Item (10)(d): Consideration of motion to receive,file and deny claim of Colich Bros., Inc. dba Colich & Sons received June 21, 1995, in the amount of $300,208.22, plus unspecified additional expenses, plus legal expenses for a fuel spill in connection with Slater Avenue Pump Station, Contract No. 11-17-1, and refer to the Districts' General Counsel and liability claims administrator for appropriate action. Summary See attached memorandum dated July 17, 1995 from General Counsel. Recommendation Staff recommends to receive and file claim from Colich Bros., Inc. dba Colich &Sons, and refer to Districts' General Counsel and liability claims administrator for appropriate action. �:�wrooc�sswceser-r ro ti JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING JULY 26,1995 DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Agenda Item (10)(e): Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications to Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3, Contract No. 5-37-3, authorizing an addition of$60,458.08 to the contract with Wal-Con Construction Company for two items of additional work and 60 calendar days time extension. Summary In September 1994, the Directors approved the plans and specifications for Contract No. 5-37-3, Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3 and Balboa Boulevard Sewer Main Replacement from 45th Street to West Coast Highway and Abandonment of 471h Street Pump Station Project, City of Newport Beach. The sewer is used to transport wastewater collected from the collection system of the Cities of Costa Mesa and Newport Beach to Treatment Plant No.2. �.d The $2.4 million project consists, in general, of replacing the old 30-inch sewer with a new 39-inch vitrified clay pipe (VCP) gravity sewer and appurtenances in Pacific Coast Highway from Bitter Point Pump Station to the Arches (Newport Boulevard), Contract No. 5-37-3 and modification of connecting of City of Newport Beach sewers to Bayside Drive trunk sewer for County Sanitation District Nos. 5 and 6 (80% District No. 5; 20% District No. 6). Also, gravity sewers and appurtenances and abandonment of a pump station in Balboa Boulevard for the City of Newport Beach. Change Order No. 1 is a net addition of$60,458.08 to the contract for two items of added work and a time extension of 60 calendar days. This project was designed by Boyle Engineering Corporation. The construction contract was awarded in October 1994 to Wal-Con Construction Company. The following is a summary of the contract amount: Original Contract Amount $1,985,000.00 Previously Approved Changes $ 0.00 This Change (Add)(9eduel) $ 60,458.03 Amended Contract Amount $2,045,458.03 Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 1 for two items of additional work for an addition $60,458.08 and 60 calendar days time extension with Wal-Con Construction Company. J:UPDOCS&AGWO7-7 0E.W P D COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS July 26, 1995 AI ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 108AA EWE AVENUE va.BON 8127 STAFF REPORT FOUNTAIN VALLEY.GUFORNIA B27269127 01AIBB -IM" DISTRICTS 5 AND 6 APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS TO REPLACEMENT OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY GRAVITY SEWER, PHASE 3, AND BALBOA BOULEVARD SEWER REPLACEMENT FROM AND ABANDONMENT OF 47TH STREET PUMP STATION PROJECT, CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, CONTRACT NO. 5-37-3 Summary In September 1994, the Directors approved the plans and specifications for Contract No. 5-37-3, Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3 and Balboa Boulevard Sewer Main Replacement from 45th Street to West Coast Highway and Abandonment of 47th Street Pump Station Project, City of Newport Beach. The sewer is used to transport wastewater collected from the collection system of the Cities of Costa Mesa and Newport Beach to Treatment Plant No. 2. The$2.4 million project consists, in general, of replacing the old 30-inch sewer with a new 39-inch vitrified day pipe (VCP) gravity sewer and appurtenances in Pacific Coast Highway from Bitter Point Pump Station to the Arches (Newport Boulevard), Contract No. 5-37-3 and modification of connecting of City of Newport Beach sewers to Bayside Drive trunk sewer for County Sanitation District Nos. 5 and 6 (80% District No. 5; 20% District No. 6). Also, gravity sewers and appurtenances and �..d abandonment of a pump station in Balboa Boulevard for the City of Newport Beach. Change Order No. 1 is a net addition of$60,458.08 to the contract for two items of added work and a time extension of 60 calendar days. This project was designed by Boyle Engineering Corporation. The construction contract was awarded in October 1994 to Wal-Con Construction Company. Item 1, in the amount of$8,470.61, is for the addition of a 36-inch ductile iron pipe (DIP)telescoping sleeve or closure piece on a force main that should have been included in the contract documents. The sleeve use was inadequately omitted by the Consultant. Item 2, in the amount of$51,987.47 and 60 calendar days, is for escalated costs of material and labor due to the delay of the start of the project at the direction of the Districts. The delay was due to the fiscal impacts on the Districts due to the bankruptcy of the County of Orange. The above items would have been included in the original design and contract if discovered or known at the time of bidding. The original contract amount for the project was $1,985,000.00. The amount of change orders to date is $60,458.08 representing a net increase of 3% over the original contract amount. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 1 for two items of additional work for an addition $60,458.08 and 60 calendar days time extension with Wal-Con Construction Company. DC:jac ENGWGRRPTS1SRO7-G4.95 4 Page 1 of 4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: ➢yal-Con Construction Company C.O. No.: One (1) Date: July 26, 1995 Job: Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer. Phase 3 and Balboa Boulevard Sewer Replacement and Abandonment of 47th Street Pump Station Protect. City of Newport Beach, Contract No. 5-37-3 Consultant: Boyle Engineerino Corporation Amount of this Change Order(Add)(8eduet) $60,458.08 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 -ADDITION OF TELESCOPING SLEEVE The Contract Drawings required the installation of a 24-inch ductile iron pipe (DIP) force main telescoping sleeve or closure piece in the modification of the force main at Station No. 55+70 on d.✓ Pacific Coast Highway(PCH). However, the drawings did not require a telescoping sleeve for the modifications to the 36-inch DIP force main at the intersection of PCH and Balboa Boulevard. Staff determined that a similar design should apply and the Contractor was instructed to provide an additional telescoping sleeve on a force account basis in accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6(B)(2)(b). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 8,470.61 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 2 -ADDED ESCALATION COSTS AND TIME EXTENSION DUE TO DELAY IN ISSUANCE OF NOTICE TO PROCEED The bids for this project were opened on October 13, 1994, awarded by the Boards of Directors (Resolution No. 94.132) on November 9, 1994 and the contract made and entered into on February 7, 1995. However, it was determined that this project along with many others should be delayed due to the state of affairs surrounding the bankruptcy on the County of Orange and its related fiscal impact on the County Sanitation Districts. Due to the anticipated delay in issuance of the Notice to proceed, the Contractor was informed that he would not be held liable for the contract completion date of August 6, 1995. Instead, the Districts would enter into negotiations for an equitable settlement via a change order for both documented and reasonable Increases in direct costs and for time extension provisions. These increased direct costs include the escalation of materials such as pipe, crushed rock, asphalt, concrete and for labor costs �..✓ due to Southern California District Council of Laborers Local No. 652 effective July 1, 1995. The increase in labor costs due to The International Union of Operating Engineers Local No. 12 is unknown at this time. Their contract expires on June 30, 1995 and a new contract has not been negotiated at this time. Therefore, this increase must be handled in a future change order. Page 2 of 4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 108"ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9272"127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Wal-Con Construction Company C.O. No.: One(1) Date: Julv 26. 1995 Job: Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3. and Balboa Boulevard Sewer Replacement and Abandonment of 47th Street Pump Station Project. City of Newport Beach. Contract No. 5-37-3 Consultant: Boyle Engineering Corporation ITEM 2-CONTINUED The Notice to Proceed will be dated August 1, 1995. The current contract time allowed for completion of the contract is 180 calendar days. An extension of time is made part of this change order and the total time to complete will be 240 calendar days from August 1, 1995. All other conditions of Section 50-8 of the Contract Documents will remain unchanged such as the $500.00 per day, liquidated damages, for each day of delay to be paid by the Contractor. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 51,987.47 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 60 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $60,458.08 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 60 Calendar Days - .t Page 3 of 4 `i COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 108"ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Wal-Con Construction Company C.O. No.: One (1) Dale: July 26, 1995 Job: Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3. and Balboa Boulevard Sewer Replacement and Abandonment of 47th Street Pump Station Project. City of Newport Beach Contrail No. 5-37-3 Consultant: Boyle Enoineerinti Corporation The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 60 days extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approve by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME V./ Original Contract Date: February 7, 1995 Original Contract Time: 180 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: 180 Calendar Days Time Extension this C.O.: 60 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 60 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 240 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: October 5, 1995 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 1,985,000.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 0.00 This Change (Add) (Beduot) $ 60.458.03 Amended Contract Price $2,045,458.03 Page 4 of 4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9272"127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Wal-Con Construction Company C.O. No.: One (1) Date: July 26, 1995 Job: Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3, and Balboa Boulevard Sewer Replacement and Abandonment of 47th Street Pump Station Project. City of Newport Beach, Contract No. 5-37-3 Consultant: Boyle Engineering Corporation Board Authorization Date: July 26, 1995 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Submitted by: 7 n ed X G� 1 71S-1 r Engineering Manager Date Construction er Date Ap pved by: r d o Form: / D' ector of Engineering Date G neral unsel Date Accepted by: WAL ANTRUCTION COMPANY 7 Contractor Date JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING JULY 26, 1995 DISTRICT 7 Agenda Item (1 U)(q: Consideration of the following actions relative to Master Plan Studies for Lemon Heights, Orange Park Acres and Cowan Heights unincorporated areas of Orange County. (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file Master Plan for the Lemon Heights Sewer System, Contract No. 7-16 (2) Consideration of motion to receive and file Master Plan for Orange Park Acres Sewer System, Contract No. 7-18. (3) Consideration of motion to receive and file Master Plan for the Cowan Heights Sewer System, Contract No. 7-19. Summary In January 1988,the Boards of Directors authorized Black 8 Veatch Engineers to conduct a preliminary study regarding unsewered properties within the unincorporated areas of Orange Park Acres,Lemon Heights and Cowan Heights. These areas are not wflhin any District,but fall under the sphere of influence of County Sanitation District No.7. In April 1990,District 7 approved the Final Report and Recommendations Re Unsewered Properties In and Adjacent to County Sanitation District No. 7Issued by the District No.7 Ad Hoc Committee. The report concluded that groundwater contamination problems most, caused,in part,by leachate from septic tanks,but an extensive public opinion survey concluded that most property owners were not willing to pay the costs of annexation and sewer construction. The Ad Hoc Committee then recommended abandonment of the project. The completion of the Irvine Ranch Water Districts Harvard Avenue Trunk Sewer(HATS),and ongoing District 7 plans to abandon local pump stations by connecting to the HATS system,renewed the Directors interest in completing the planning phase of the local Lemon Heights area sewerage system. In May 1991, the Ad Hoc Committee recommended,and the Board approved,both preliminary and final design for the Lemon Heights Sewer System,Contract No.7-16. The Ad Hoc Committee also recommended that a master plan be prepared for both Cowan Heights and Orange Park Acres. In April 1992,the Board awarded a Professional Services Agreement to Boyle Engineering Corporation for the preparation of plans and specifications for Replacement of a Portion of Orange Park Acres Sewer,Contract No.7-17,and Master Plan for Orange Park Acres Sewer System,Contract No.7-18,and the Master Plan for Cowan Heights Sewer System,Contract No.7-19. The Orange Park Acres and Cowan Heights Master Plans are complete. The construction of the sewering systems would be constructed by individual developers in a piece meal fashion or by forming an Assessment District. CEQA documents would be processed following formation of an Assessment District. The Replacement of a Portion of Orange Park Acres Sewer,Contract No.7-17 is 80%complete and currently on hold. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Master Plans for Lemon Heights Sewer System,Orange Park Acres Sewer System and Cowan Heights Sewer System be received and filed. Vr� J:tW PDDCeS W G9507-1 GF.W PD COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 101W EWS AVENUE Y.O.BON 8121 G WAIN VAMY.CALIFORNIA 9272MI 27 July 18, 1995 M41B82P411 STAFF REPORT Agenda Item (10)(f): Consideration of the following actions relative to Master Plan Studies for Orange Park Acres and Cowan Heights Unincorporated Areas of Orange County: (1) Consideration of Motion to receive and file Master Plan for the Lemon Heights Sewer System, Contract No. 746. (1) Consideration of Motion to receive and file Master Plan for Orange Park Acres Sewer Systems, Contract No.7-18. (2) Consideration of Motion to receive and file Master Plan for the Cowan Heights Sewer System,Contract No.7-19. Summary In 1979, County Sanitation District No. 7 (CSD7) purchased certain sewers from the City of Orange. The purchase included the Santiago Canyon Road Sewer from Linda Vista Street to Orange Park Acres Boulevard at Clark Street, and the Orange Park Acres Sewer from south of Meads Avenue to Chapman Avenue. �..� Between Orange Park Acres Boulevard (at Clark Street) and a point south of Meads Avenue adjacent to Handy Creek, the sewer uses a City of Orange sewer. The city-owned portion was constructed with 12-inch diameter pipe, connecting a CSD7 upstream 18-inch diameter pipe to a downstream CSD7 21-inch diameter pipe. For years,this hydraulic deficiency has been planned for correction, most recently in the Districts' 1989 Master Plan. The replacement would consist of approximately 3,000 feet of 18-and 21-inch diameter sewer. The alignment will parallel the city sewer in Meads Avenue, Randall and Clark Streets. New upstream development, particularly in the areas southwest of the intersection of Santiago Canyon Road and Chapman Avenue, makes this replacement required. A special CSD7 Ad Hoc Committee study of local sewers for the Lemon Heights, Cowan Heights and Orange Park Acres areas have reviewed master planning for Lemon Heights. The noted areas are not in any of the Districts, but fall under the sphere of influence of CSD7. In January 1988,the Directors authorized Black&Veatch Engineers to conduct a preliminary study regarding unsewered properties within the unincorporated areas of Orange Park Acres, Lemon Heights and Cowan Heights and individual parcels within the City of Tustin. A preliminary design report was issued in January 19B9 with potential solutions and costs tabulated to sewer the areas. After considerable study, in April 1990, CS07 approved the Final Report and Recommendations re Unsewered Properties in and Adjacent to County Sanitation District No. 7 used by the CSD7 Ad Hoc Committee. While the report concluded that groundwater contamination problems exist in the study areas, caused in part by leachale from on-site sewage disposal systems(septic tanks, etc.). An extensive public opinion survey concluded that most property owners were not willing to pay the cost of annexation, connection and sewer construction, even if substantially underwritten by the District. Thus,the Ad Hoc Committee recommended, and the Board approved, abandonment of the proposed project until the residents express an interest in developing a sewage system. �.d The completion of the Irvine Ranch Water District's Harvard Avenue Trunk Sewer(HATS),and •. ongoing CSD7 plans to abandon local pump stations by connection sewers previously served by the pump station to HATS, renewed interest by the Directors in completing at least the planning and preliminary design for a local sewerage system in the Lemon Heights area of unincorporated Orange County. The gravity sewer laterals,which will allow abandonment of the pump station will, in addition, provide a future outlet for the currently unsewered properties. Additions to these laterals may allow other portions of the Lemon Heights area to be sewered in the future, provided that the property owners wish to pay for these extensions. In May 1991,the Ad Hoc Committee recommended and the Board approved both the preliminary and final sewer design for the Lemon Heights Sewer System,Contract No. 7-16, including compliance requirements from the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)as part of the work. The Ad Hoc Committee also recommended that a master plan be prepared for both the Cowan Heights and Orange Park Acres. (This work could best be combined with the design of the Orange Park Acres Sewer since aerial topography with have to be flown for both projects). In April 1992,the Board awarded a Professional Services Agreement to Boyle Engineering Corporation to prepare the plans and specifications for the Replacement of a Portion of Orange Park Acres Sewer, Contract No. 7.17, and the preliminary engineering plans for the Preparation of Master Plan of Sewers for Orange Park Acres(Contract No. 7-18) and Cowan Heights(Contract No.7-19). The Lemon Heights,Orange Park Acres and Cowan Heights Sewer System Master Plans are complete. However, the Master Plans are in reality detailed studies that show how and where the local sewers would have to be built to make the systems work. Each of these systems requires most of the easements across private property and most likely the formation of an assessment district or other vehicle to fund the construction of the proposed local sewers. Because of the way CSD7 is organized and the way previous local sewers were funded through assessment districts,the proposed facilities to be build could not be funded through the normal CSD7 Capital Facilities Fund. The next step would be to form assessment districts and process CEQA documents. However,to do this, an election would have to be conducted and most of those households residing within any proposed assessment district would have to vote in favor of the proposal. Staff has had at least two public meetings within the last three years. The result was less than enthusiastic. Except a few key individuals,who had to correct severe problems with their septic tanks or lacked the ability to gel a permit from the county to build a septic tank and subsequent houses on the property. The assessment district would have to pay for all of the costs to process CEQA documents to purchase easements, if necessary, complete the detailed design of the individual local sewers, and complete the final construction. Bonds could be sold to help raise the money, but the ultimate responsibility to pay for all the above-mentioned costs resides with the homeowner as an assessment to his property. Very few are willing to commit to these assessments. Staff recommends that CSD7 not proceed with the work until the interested citizens take the lead. As suggested in the public meetings, the interested citizens should pass out petitions and concur with many of residents sufficient to initiate a formal election of the formation of assessment districts. The Replacement of a Portion of Orange Park Acres Sewers, Contract No. 7-17 is a different type of contract. It is a trunk sewer instead of a local sewer and is a replacement for an undersized existing sewer. The design is 80% complete and currently on hold bemuse of bankruptcy related decisions. Funding is available. Staff Recommendation The following three items are requested by Staff for action: (1) Receive and file Master Plan for Lemon Heights Sewer System. Contract No.7-16. (2) Receive and file Master Plan for Orange Park Acres Sewer System, Contract No. 7-18. (3) Receive and file Master Plan for Cowan Heights Sewer System, Contract No. 7-19. wndoaM(✓r %Nb0608%.er JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS MEETING AGENDA FOR JULY 26, 1995 Agenda Item (12)(a): Minutes of the Executive Committee Summary (1) Receive and file draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on June 21, 1995. (2) Receive and file draft Operations, Maintenance, and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on July 5, 1995. (3) Receive and file Ad Hoc Committee Minutes for the meeting held July 6, 1995. (4) Receive and file draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on July 6, 1995. (5) Receive and file draft Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on July 12, 1995. (6) Receive and file draft Executive Committee Minutes for the meeting held on July 19, 1995. Summary See attached minutes. Executive Committee Recommendation to the Joint Boards of Directors Receive and file minutes listed above. 4.d nwwoaasvaesn�nv, II County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California P.O.Box 8127• 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714) 962-2411 �I DRAFT MINUTES OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE June 28, 1995 - 5:30 P.M. A meeting of the Steering Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held Wednesday, June 28, 1995, at 5:30 p.m., at the Districts' Administrative office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: STEERING COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT: Present: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Bob Zemmel, Director John C. Cox, Jr., Joint Chair Peer A. Swan, Vice Joint Chair John J. Collins, Chair, PDC Pat McGuigan, Chair, OMTS - STAFF PRESENT: Absent: Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager Gary Streed, Director of Finance George Brown, Chair, FAHR Jean Tappan, Secretary Roger Stanton, Vice Chair, FAHR (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary- (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. (4) APPROVAL OF MINUTES V The minutes of the May 24, 1995 Steering Committee meeting were approved as drafted. Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting Page 2 June 28, 1995 (5) REPORTS OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR, GENERAL MANAGER AND GENERAL COUNSEL No reports were made. (6) STEERING COMMITTEE DISCUSSION ITEMS (a) Recruitments. Assistant General Manager—Administration: The six first round finalists will be interviewed July 6 and 7. The candidate pool appears to be very strong. The General Manager indicated that he would like to see the position filled by a "generalist" rather than a specialist. Technical Services Director: Nancy Wheatley, currently with Massachusetts Water Resources Authority, has accepted the Districts offer and will start August 7. Laboratory Manager: Interviews will be held for the three finalists the week of July 10\—) The new Technical Services Director will be on the interview panel. Engineering Director: Sixty-six applications were received and interviews are scheduled to begin in two to three weeks. (b) Budget. The cost per million gallons was the main discussion item. It is estimated to be $599 and is considered the Districts' basic benchmark. The General Manager will be meeting with all employees in the next month to discuss ways to reduce that number. (c) Consolidation. A discussion ensued on the effects of the County bankruptcy on the consolidation of the Districts. The Committee directed staff to continue with the consolidation studies and address how to proceed with the problems with the County as they arise. A white paper is to be prepared to address our reserves and debt and how they are allocated. Most of the information is found in the new budget. General Counsel will continue with research how best to address the debt program under consolidation. s Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting Page 3 June 28, 1995 The Committee directed staff to prepare a model organization structure for the July 19, 1995 Executive Committee: One district, how many directors, one financing entity, and fee issues. Additional consideration should be given to areas currently outside the Consolidated Districts' sphere of influence should the Districts take over the landfills. Agreements with other entities (SAWPA and IRWD) must also be considered. The General Manager reported that SAWPA has requested a seat on the Board. While this is a separate subject from the consolidation, it should also be considered. (d) Organizational Issues. The Directors were alerted that an employee may be addressing the Directors on his opposition to the reorganization of the Technical Services Department. (e) County of Orange Bankruptcy. The General Manager thought that many of our existing and future assets are now at risk and we should be developing contingencies. Staff will continue to keep the Directors advised. (f) State's Constitution Revision Commission. There was a discussion on the Commission's efforts and how they may affect the Districts. General Counsel indicated that unfortunately Proposition 13 included a lot of delegated authority to the stale and this could be exercised. This will be monitored and the Directors will be kept advised. (g) Revisions to Ordinance re Permits and Fees The General Manager discussed the issue and some of the background. Cities are now charging the Districts for encroachment permits and fees which heretofore had been free. Engineering staff have asked that the policy be reconsidered and that the Districts in turn charge the cities for inspection fees. Staff was directed to report to the PDC Committee on which cities are charging the Districts, and also to prepare a draft staff report on the change in policy. Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting Page 4 June 28, 1995 (7) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. (8) OTHER BUSINESS The Joint Chair and the General Manager will conduct the performance review for the Board Secretary. The Joint Chair announced that the RFP for AB 2766 funds will be out shortly. The submittal deadline is September 15. He encouraged the Districts to respond. (9) MATTERS TO BE REPORTED AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were no matters to be reported. (10) MATTERS ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT There were no matters for a future agenda. (11) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next meeting will be at the call of the Joint Chair. (12) ADJOURNMENT The Steering Committee adjourned at approximately 6:43 p.m. Submitted by: Jean Tappan, Steering Committee Secretary County Sanitation Districts II of Orange County,Ellis Avenue P.O. Box in V • y,CA Ellis Avenue � Fountain Valley,CA 92728-9127 Telephone:(714)962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF THE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY, JULY b. 1995-5:30 PM A meeting of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on July 5, 1995, at 5:30 P.M. at the Districts' Administrative offices. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was Called and a quorum declared present as follows: Committee Directors Present: Staff Present: Pal McGuigan, Chair Blake Anderson,Assistant General Manager John C. Cox,Jr.,Joint Chair Mark Esquer, Operations Engineer Barry Denes Gary Hasenstab, Director of Human Resources �„✓ Norman Z. Eckenrode Ed Hodges, Director of Maintenance James M. Ferryman Terri Josway, Manager of Safety and Health Mark A. Murphy Don McIntyre, General Manager Peer Swan Mike Moore,Technical Services Division Bob Dolan, Director of Operations Ed Torres, Director of Technical Services Committee Directors Absent: Others Present: Victor Leipzig,Vice Chair Julie Sa Sal Sapien (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIRMAN PRO TEM. IF NECESSARY No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no Comments from the public. a Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Meeting Page 2 of 4 July 5, 1995 .. (4) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR. GENERAL MANAGER, ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER OF OPERATIONS, DIRECTOR OF MAINTENANCE AND GENERAL COUNSEL (a) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee's tour of Plant No. 2 is to be held August 2, 1995. The Committee is to meet at the regular place and time for dinner and the tour will follow. (b) REPORT OF GENERAL MANAGER Don McIntyre reported on the following: 1. Don McIntyre and Blake Anderson will be attending a meeting July 7 on the Service Delivery System. It is believed that the meeting will be to look at Supervisor Bergeson's idea of a new charter for the County. They will report back to the OMTS Committee, if necessary. 2. There are six candidates for the position of Assistant General Manager of Administration. Interviews are to be held on July 6 and 7. (c) REPORT OF ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER OF OPERATIONS Blake Anderson reported on the following: 1. There are 66 applications in for the position of Director of Engineering. 2. The interviews for the Laboratory Manager will be done the week of July 10. Nancy Wheatley, the new Director of Technical Services, will be in town and will be on the interviewing panel. 3. Excellent news. The District Attorney's office has formally notified the Districts that their investigation of the February 1, 1994 accident at Plant No. 2 is complete and they found the Districts were not at fault. OSHA previously cited the Districts on points staff strenuously contends; the attorneys are working on the matter. This leaves the Civil case, filed by the survivors, as the only outstanding portion of this matter. (d) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF MAINTENANCE Ed Hodges reported on the following: 1. We have received some positive responses and questions from City Managers who received our Spill Containment Policy. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Meeting Page 3 of 4 .. July 5, 1995 2. AB2766 (the Sher Bill) provides $25 million, available as part of the DMV vehicle registration. This money is available for the conversion of Heavy Duly vehicles to compressed natural gas (CNG) and electric vehicles in the South Coast Air Basin. The South Coast AQMD is soliciting proposals from interested parties. Proposals are due September 17. Ed Hodges will report on the status of the Districts' proposal at the September 6 OMTS Committee meeting (e) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES Ed Tones reported on the contents of the House side of the Clean Water Act and what impact it would have on the Districts. He also reported on AMSA's strategy for dealing with the Senate version Reauthorization (HR961) and how it relates to existing legislative requirements. It was noted that this is not viewed as a high priority and will probably not be on this year's Senate calendar. If) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL No report was given. (5) APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF JUNE 7. 1995 There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held on June 7, 1995, it was moved, seconded and carried that said minutes be deemed approved as mailed. (6) OLD BUSINESS OMTS95-020: Quarterly Status Report on the Implementation of the 38 Recommendations made as part of the Ernst and Young Audit of the Operations and Maintenance Departments - Information Item Ed Hodges gave a brief status report. OMTS95-021: Quarterly Report on the Districts' Occupational Injury and Near Miss Accident Rates- Information Item Terri Josway gave a presentation and answered the questions of the Committee members. (7) NEW BUSINESS OMTS95-036: Consideration of Motion Authorizing the General Manager to Enter Into Engineering Feasibility Studies with the Southern California Edison (SCE)"ENVEST" Program to study energy conservation measures at the Districts'treatment plants for an amount not to exceed $30,000 -Action Item Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Meeting Page 4 of 4 July 5, 1995 Bob Ooten gave a short presentation and a discussion followed. It was then moved, seconded and carried to approve staffs recommendation with the stipulation that before additional money is spent, the item must come back before the OMTS Committee for approval. OMTS95-037: Consideration of Motion to receive and file a report on the Status of Hiring a Security(Guard)Company to provide security and guard services for the Districts -Information Item Item was received as an information item and not discussed. OMTS95-038: Consideration of Motion Authorizing the General Manager to approve Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with Ernst&Young to include services for development of documentation and provide training for conducting process Improvement analysis of key programs within the Technical services Department for an amount not to exceed $20,000 -Action Item Ed Torres answered the questions of the Committee members. It was then moved, seconded and carried to approve staffs recommendation. (8) CLOSED SESSION The Chair declared there were no items for closed session. (9) OTHER BUSINESS, IF ANY Ed Torres is to prepare a summary of his report on the Clean Water Act Reauthorization, for Director Sapien and the Chair, Director McGuigan, before the CASA Congress beginning August 9, 1995. (10) MATTERS ON WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING None. (11) MATTERS A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT None. (12) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING DATES AND ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AT THOSE MEETINGS None. (13) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:50 P.M. /cm JAWPDOMMI ECUUL9510MMMIN County Sanitation Districts II of Orange County,California P.O. Box 8127.108"Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF AD HOC COMMITTEE MEETING Friday. July 6 1995 at 4:30 p.m. A meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13, and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Thursday, July 6, 1995, at the Districts' Administrative Office. (1) ROLL CALL Those present were as follows: AD HOC COMMITTEE: STAFF PRESENT: John Collins, PDC Comm. Chair Don McIntyre, General Manager John Cox, Joint Chair Blake Anderson, Asst. General Manager Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair Gary Streed, Director of Finance Don Griffin, Past Joint Chair John Linder, Director of Engineering (2) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments received. (3) APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the April 28, 1995 Ad Hoc Committee were approved as written. (4) REPORTS OF COMMITTEE CHAIR GENERAL MANAGER AND DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING There were no reports. (5) NEW AND MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS "� There were none. Minutes of Ad Hoc Committee Meeting Page 2 July 6, 1995 (6) OLD BUSINESS (a) The draft Scope of Work for space utilization study was discussed. Several clarifications were suggested by the Committee including the attachment prepared by Director Griffin. The Scope will be revised and returned to this Committee for review prior to sending out with Request for Proposals (RFP) to selected consultants. (b) The remaining items on the agenda were not addressed by the Committee due to the time restraints. The Chairman determined that the Ad Hoc Committee would meet at 5:00 p.m., Friday, July 14, 1995 to discuss and take action on the items not addressed at the meeting of July 6, 1995. (c) The Committee will seek authorization at the Planning, Design and Construction (PDC) Committee meeting to be delegated the authority to make the final decisions on actions required to solicit, negotiate, award, and issue purchase order to various vendors for Modifications to the Existing Interior Office Spaces in the Administration Building for the General Management, Administrative, and Communication offices. (7) OTHER BUSINESS, IF ANY No other business was discussed. (8) FUTURE MEETINGS The next meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee will be held Friday, July 14, 1995 at 5:00 p.m. (9) ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 5:30 p.m. Gail Cain Committee Secretary JDL:gc ADHOC95\070695.10IN County Sanitation Districts II of Orange County,California P.O.Box 8127.10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE Thursday, July 6. 1995 at 5:30 p.m. A regular meeting of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13, and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Thursday, July 6, 1995, at the Districts' Administrative Office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was taken and a quorum declared present, as follows: PLANNING. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE: STAFF PRESENT: John Collins, Chair Don McIntyre, General Manager �.. John Cox, Joint Chair Blake Anderson, Assistant General Shirley Dettloff Manager Don Griffin John Linder, Director of Engineering Barry Hammond Steve Hovey, Director of Information Margie Rice Services Sheldon Singer, Vice Chair Bob Ooten, Director of Operations Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair Gary Streed, Director of Finance Charles Sylvia Jack Vincent, Planning & Design Manager Nick Arhontes, Staff Engineer, Maintenance Stuart Severn, Systems Engineer Paul Mitchell, Project Manager e Minutes of Planning, Design and Construction Committee Meeting Page 2 July 6, 1995 (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM John Collins advised that if the Chairman is present and the Vice Chair is absent, there is no need to have a Chairman pro tem. The only time there is a need for a Chairman pro tem is if the Chairman is absent. No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments received. (4) APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF APRIL 6. 1995 MEETING The minutes of the July 6, Planning, Design and Construction Committee were approved as written. (5) REPORTS OF COMMITTEE CHAIR, GENERAL MANAGER, ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER, DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING AND GENERAL COUNSEL (a) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR There was no report made by the Committee Chair. (b) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager stated they had conducted interviews with five of the six candidates for the position of Assistant General Manager. They were conducting the interview of the sixth candidate tomorrow, and were expecting to make a decision by the beginning of next week. REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER The Assistant General Manager reported on the recruitment for the Director of Engineering position. Human Resources is in receipt of approximately 60 applications, ten of which look very good. Interviewing will begin shortly. Next week, interviews will begin for the Laboratory Division Manager. Nancy Wheatley, who has been selected as the Director of Technical Services, will take part in the interviews for the Laboratory Division Manager. , Minutes of Planning, Design and - Construction Committee Meeting Page 3 July 6, 1995 The Assistant General Manager provided an update on the accident at Plant 2 on the Pascal and Ludwig job. CalOSHA is still conducting their investigation and the District Attorney has determined that there was no criminality on the part of the Districts. (c) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING There was no report made by the Director of Engineering. (d) REPORT OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL There was no report made by the General Counsel. (6) STAFF OVERVIEW OF DISTRICTS' PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES (a) Status Report on Ernst &Young's Capital Project Management Improvements Process (Nick Arhontes) Nick Arhontes gave a brief update on Ernst &Young's Capital Project Management Improvements. A revised "Action Plans Schedule" was provided to all in attendance. There are approximately 50 people involved in the 14 Task Groups. Nick will report on the Capital Project Management Improvements again in three months. (7) OLD BUSINESS None to report. (8) ACTIONS RE PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTS (a) Quarterly Change Order Report by Director of Engineering The Director of Engineering discussed the Quarterly Change Order Report. It was moved, seconded, and passed to receive and file the Monthly Change Order Report. 1 of e Minutes of Planning, Design and Construction Committee Meeting Page 4 July 6, 1995 (b) Action Items PDC95-23: Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Miscellaneous Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P7-42, and Miscellaneous Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-49 for a credit of$18,941.00 to the contact with Pascal & Ludwig Engineers for two items of additional work and three items of deleted work. Committee questioned why this item was on this report. The Director of Engineering reported that this item is a credit of $18,941.00, however, the additions are above what the General Manager can approve. It involves miscellaneous work done at both Plant 1 and Plant 2. Motion made, seconded, and passed. (9) ADDENDA TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS (a) Director of Engineering reported on the Addenda to the Professional Services Agreement. In the last quarter, there were only two addenda to Professional Services Agreements. (10) NEW PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS None to report. (11) CONSIDERATION OF NEW AND MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS PDC95-24: Discussion of Plant Automation Computer System and Consideration of Motion Authorizing Staff to Issue Purchase Order with Pioneer-Standard Electronics for Two VAX 4000, Model 705A Computers for Plant 2 Plant Automation. Steve Hovey and Stuart Severn presented the Committee with a proposal for the computer hardware upgrade of two existing VAX 4000, Model 300 Computers to VAX 4000, Model 705A Computers for Plant 2 automation and the purchase of 32 DEC Pentium Personal Computers for Operations at both Plant 1 and Plant 2. There was lengthy discussion about the cost and critical timing due to weather and how the "old" equipment utilization had changed since the initial issue was brought to the Committee a year ago. The Committee felt that the cost for the new equipment was highly inflated. Minutes of Planning, Design and Construction Committee Meeting Page 5 July 6, 1995 The Committee authorized staff to proceed with the part of the proposal to purchase the two VAX 4000 Computers for Plant 2 automation, and address the purchase of the 32 Pentium Personal Computers at the September meeting after more competitive quotes are received. Motion was made, seconded, and passed to purchase the two computers for the Ocean Outfall Booster Station (OOBS). PDC95-25: Consideration of Motion to Approve the Ad Hoc Committee Recommendations re Space Utilization Study for Actions Required to Solicit, Negotiate, Award and Issue Purchase Orders to Various Vendors for Modifications to the Existing Interior Office Spaces in the Administration Building for General Management, Administration, and Communication Offices, Specification No. E-256, in an Amount Not to Exceed $165,250.00. A meeting with the Ad Hoc Committee was held prior to the PDC meeting and time ran out discussing the items relating to the Space Utilization Study. A meeting is scheduled for next Friday, July 14, 1995, at 5:00 p.m. to continue discussion. It was proposed that the Committee delegate the authority to the Ad Hoc Committee to make a decision on this item. The item deals with modifying the existing interior office spaces in the Administration Building for General Management, Administration, and Communication offices. Motion was made, seconded, and passed to delegate authority to the Ad Hoc Committee to make said decisions. (12) CLOSED SESSION The Chair determined that there was no need for a Closed Session. (13) OTHER BUSINESS, IF ANY No other business was discussed. (14) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were no matters discussed. Minutes of Planning, Design and Construction Committee Meeting Page 6 July 6, 1995 (16) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT There were no matters discussed. (16) NEXT MEETING (a) Executive Committee Meeting -Wednesday, July 19, 1995 at 5:30 p.m. (b) Joint Boards of Directors Meeting -Wednesday, July 26, 1995 at 7:30 p.m. (c) Ad Hoc Committee Meeting - Friday, July 14, 1995 at 5:00 p.m. (d) Planning, Design and Construction Committee Meeting -Thursday, September 7, 1995 at 5:30 p.m. at Plant 2 Operations Center (17) OTHER ANNOUNCEMENTS, IF ANY There will be a tour of Plant 2 on Wednesday. August 2, 1995, at 5:30 p.m. Meet at Plant 1 Administration to take bus to Plant 2. If you plan on attending, please contact Jean Tappan in the General Manager's office. (18) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:15 p.m. /Gail A. Cain Planning, Design and Construction Committee Secretary wpd=\n& 5mpX070N5.min 1 II County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California P.O. Box 8127.10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 9272841127 Telephone: (714)9624411 DRAFT MINUTES OF FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE Wednesday, July 12, 1995, 5:30 P.M. A meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on July 12, 1995 at 5:30 p.m., at the Districts' Administrative Offices. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: Committee Directors Present: Staff Present: John C. Cox, Jr., Joint Chairman Don McIntyre, General Manager George Brown, Chairman Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager Burnie Dunlap Gary Slreed, Director of Finance James Flora Ed Hodges, Director of Maintenance John M. Gullixson Bob Ooten, Director of Operations Wally Linn Mike White, Controller b.✓ Thomas Saltarelli Steve Kozak, Financial Manager Roger R. Stanton, Vice Chairman William G. Steiner Others Present Peer Swan Tom Woodruff, General Counsel Committee Directors Absent: Rich Brown, Orange County Employees Assn. Jan Debay (2) APPOINTMENT OF A CHAIRMAN PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS No comments were made. (4) REPORTS OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR, GENERAL MANAGER ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGERS) DIRECTOR OF FINANCE/TREASURER DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES AND GENERAL COUNSEL (a) Report of the Committee Chair George Brown, Chairman, had no report. Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee ' Page 2 July 12, 1995 (b) Report of the General Manager ..d General Manager Don McIntyre reported on the status of pending recruitments for Laboratory Manager, Director of Engineering and Assistant General Manager for Administration. He requested that the proposed salary level of the Assistant General Manager be added to the agenda in order to have a Committee recommendation to the Boards. The Committee voted to add an emergency agenda item. (c) Report of Assistant General Manager Assistant General Manager Blake Anderson updated the Committee on recent events regarding the County bankruptcy, including the OCIP Pool Committee meeting of earlier in the day. He reported on the interest allocation expected next week, the litigation strategy against Merrill Lynch at. al, the hearing before Judge Ryan scheduled for July 14, 1995, the reasons the OCIP Pool Committee opposed the "roll-over" agreement, pending bankruptcy related items in Sacramento and continuing discussions regarding the landfills. (d) Report of the Finance Director/Treasurer Finance Director/Treasurer Gary Streed reviewed the reports included with the agenda package updating the Committee on the status of the Districts' cash and investments. He further advised the Committee that the Districts' agreements with Pacific Investment Management Company, "PIMCO; to serve as Investment Manager, and Mellon Trust Company, to serve as Custodial Bank are being finalized, and that funds are expected to be transferred before month-end. Mr. Streed also reviewed the remarketing activities for the Series "A," Series "C," and Series "1993 Refunding" COPs, and the interest rate history for the past month. (e) Report of the Director of Human Resources Gary Hasenstab, Director of Human Resources, reported that the Orange County District Attorney had recently notified the Districts that the case had been closed regarding any criminal negligence in the February 1994 fire at Plant 2 and that no negligence had been found. (f) Report of General Counsel Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, reviewed a report contained in the agenda package and requested that the Committee approve an adjustment in the fee schedule of his firm's Professional Services Agreement with the Districts. The Committee recommendation is reported as FAHR95-34 below. Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 3 July 12, 1995 (5) FINAL DRAFT REPORT OF THE ERNST&YOUNG FINANCE FUNCTIONAL REVIEW OF PURCHASING AND WAREHOUSING. ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS. This report will be presented to the Executive Committee at their meeting of. July 19, 1995. There was no discussion regarding this item at the meeting. (6) APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the draft minutes of the June 14, 1995, meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee. (7) OLD BUSINESS FAHR95-25 Classification. Compensation. and Other Terms, Conditions. Rules and Regulations of Em llooyment Gary Hasenstab, Director of Human Resources, reviewed the Employee Benefit Program Summary. The Committee had requested an expanded summary which included examples and amounts. It was moved, seconded and duly carried to receive and file this report which is intended to be filed with the original report. (8) NEW BUSINESS FAHR95-31 Consideration of Motion to Adoot Investment Performance Review Guidelines for the Districts' Investment Program After discussion on this matter, it was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend that the Executive Committee approve the following actions: 1. Adopt the investment performance benchmarks for the Liquid Operating Monies fund, the 3-month T-Bill rate and the Callan Active Cash Fixed-income Style Group; and the Long-Term Operating Fund, the Merrill Lynch Government and Corporate 1 to 5-year Maturity Index and the Callan Defensive Fixed-Income Style Group, as recommended by staff. 2. Adopt the contents and frequency of routine investment performance reports to be reviewed by the Committee each month or quarter as recommended by staff. Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 4 July 12, 1995 FAHR95-32 Consideration of Proposed Changes to the IRS-Approved Section 457 Deferred Compensation Plan as follows: (a) Consideration of Resolution No. 95- Approving First Amendment to Deferred Compensation Plan for Officers and Employees in Order to Permit Greater Flexibility in Plan Distribution Elections, Clarify Certain Provisions of the Plan. and Comply with Certain Recent Internal Revenue Service Interpretations. (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 95- Approving Amended Deferred Compensation Program for Management. Professional and Supervisory Employees. After discussion on this matter, it was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend that the Executive Committee approve (a) the First Amendment to the CSDOC Deferred Compensation Plan which clarifies the Plan and incorporates I.R.S. changes at no cost to the Districts, and; (b) modifications to the Management, Professional and Supervisory Employees Deferred Compensation Program only to add those positions to the program that were approved as a part of the resolution of the former Confidential Unit last month. FAHR95-33 Consideration of Orange County Employees Association (OCEA) Grievance Concerning Side Letter Agreement After discussion on this matter, it was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend that the grievance be denied on the basis that no group of employees did in fad receive a general increase in salary during the period of November 26, 1993, through November 23, 1996, higher than the negotiated increase received by the OCEA unit. FAHR95-34 Consideration of Amendment No. 13 re Agreement for Employment of General Counsel The Committee reported their high regard for the services rendered by Rourke, Woodruff& Spradlin over the past several years. After discussion of alternative methods to obtain legal services including the current privatizing, developing an in- house team and a mix of the two, the Committee recommended approval of Amendment No. 13 re Agreement for Employment of General Counsel, including an increase in hourly rates for Mr. Woodruff, Principals and Senior Associate, Associates and Paralegals; and future annual increases based upon the changes in an index. The Committee also directed staff and General Counsel to return to a future meeting with a report regarding alternative methods to obtain legal services. Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 5 July 12, 1995 (9) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session required. (10) OTHER BUSINESS, IF ANY None. (11) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING The Committee requested two items be considered at future meetings: A) A review of alternative methods of obtaining legal services, B) A review of total compensation for exempt employees. (12) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT None. (13) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING DATES AND ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AT THOSE MEETINGS The Committee will not meet in August, November and December 1995, as no Executive Committee meetings are scheduled, and no FAHR Committee recommendation could be carried to the respective Joint Board meetings. The next Committee meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, September 13, 1995. (15) ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 7:30 p.m. !gs J1N/PDOCIFlMCRANEFPCMfOFPCDSYAHUIESMiAMR]A% II County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California P.O. Box 8127 • 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 wry+ DRAFT II MINUTES OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE July 26, 1995- 5:30 P.M. A meeting of the Executive Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Wednesday, July 26, 1995, at 5:30 p.m., at the Districts' Administrative offices. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT: Present: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Larry Seigel, Ernst& Young John Cox,Jr., Joint Chair Elizabeth Van Denburgh, Ernst &Young Peer A. Swan, Vice Joint Chair Jay Erhgott, Ernst&Young Pat McGuigan, Chair, District 1 and Chris Patrick, Ernst&Young OMITS Chair John J. Collins, Chair, District 2 and PDC Chair STAFF PRESENT: Sal A. Sapien, Chair, District 3 Jan Debay, Chair, District 5 Don McIntyre, General Manager James Ferryman, Chair, District 6 Gary Hasenstab, Director of Personnel Barry Hammond, Chair, District 7 Ed Hodges, Director of Maintenance Thomas Saltarelli, Chair, District 14 Steve Hovey, Director of Information Roger Stanton, County Supervisor Technology William Steiner, County Supervisor John Linder, Director of Engineering Don R. Griffin, Past Joint Chair Bob Ooten, Director of Operations Gary Streed, Director of Finance Absent: Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary Mark Esquer, Operations Engineer Director George Brown, FAHR Chair Ted Hoffman, Purchasing Manager Victor Leipzig, Chair, District 11 Steve Kozak, Financial Manager (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. Minutes of the Executive Committee 6 Page 2 of 6 July 26, 1995 (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. (4) APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the June 21, 1995, Executive Committee meeting were approved as revised. (5) REPORTS OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR, GENERAL MANAGER AND GENERAL COUNSEL (a) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair had no report. (b) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager announced the need to consider an additional item not listed on the agenda. It was moved, seconded and duly carried to consider EXEC95-04 as an added item on the agenda following the report of General Counsel, that was not listed through clerical error, to wit: to receive and file the Finance Function Review prepared by Ernst&Young. The General Manager reported briefly on the Orange County Financial Recovery Round Table and deferred to Supervisor Steiner for more details. General Counsel reported that he had been involved in meetings in the past few weeks, both locally and in Sacramento, on different proposals on the bankruptcy problems and recommended solutions. Some of the proposals discussed at the Round Table meeting were negotiations for waiving the payment of the final 10 cents; a consumer boycott of Merrill Lynch; requesting Orange County Retirement System to provide financing on $110 million based on extending the usable life of the County-owned buildings; equity funding because Orange County is a donor property tax county; no new taxes; taking special districts portion of the property tax; raiding the reserves of special districts; actions being considered on the state level, and what results these actions could have on the Districts. After a lengthy discussion, staff was directed to analyze the financial and political options and alternatives including revenue reserve policies and other policies in a report to be presented at the July 26, 1995 Joint Board meeting. (c) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL Good news. It was announced at the OCIP meeting today that the amount of post- petition interest has finally been agreed on—$85 million. These funds should be available by Friday. The Committee also discussed the Soloman Bros. plan and there is concern that it doesn't include any way to balance the books. They are trying to �..� determine how much is needed in hard money without OCIP members taking a hit. Therefore, there is some urgency on the part of the Sanitation Districts to adopt a fundamental policy in the near future. Under Proposition 13, user fees can only be Minutes of the Executive Committee Page 3 of 6 July 26, 1995 increased an amount equal to the actual increased cost of a service. The Districts have previously allocated to user fees debt service and this has been acknowledged by the county and slate as a valid prior encumbrance and commitment, thus exempt from the tax shift. EXEC95-04: The management consulting firm of Ernst & Young presented their findings on the Finance Department, assessing the role and effective of the Finance Department functions, comparison against industry"leading practices", identifies areas for improvement and proposes action plans and timelines. The Directors asked staff if it agreed with the findings of the report. The only disagreement was the recommendation of a reduction in the size of the warehouse planned for Plant 2. This has been referred to the PDC Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization. Staff will be updating the Directors periodically on the status of implementing the recommended action plans. A motion was made, seconded and duly carried to receive and file the Finance Function Review prepared by Ernst & Young, identified as EXEC95-04. (6) A motion was made, seconded and duly carried to receive and file draft minutes of the Steering Committee meeting held June 28, 1995. (7) (a) A motion was made, seconded and duly carried to receive and file draft minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Meeting held July 5, 1995. (b) A motion was made, seconded and duly carried to concur in the recommended actions of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Meeting held July 5, 1995, as follows: OMTS95-036: Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to enter into Engineering Feasibility Studies with Southern California Edison "ENVEST° Program to study energy conservation measures at the Districts'treatment plants, for an amount not to exceed $30,000. OMT895-038: Consideration of the following actions re Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with Ernst& Young, providing for additional services for the development of documentation and training for conducting process improvement analysis of key programs within the Technical Services Department, as follows: (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file OMTS Committee certification of the final negotiated fee with Ernst& Young for �..i said additional services. Minutes of the Executive Committee Page 4 of 6 July 26, 1995 `ash (2) Consideration of resolution approving Addendum No. 4 to said agreement with Ernst&Young for said additional services, for an additional amount not to exceed $20,000.00, increasing the total authorized compensation from $453,000.00 to an amount not to exceed $473,000.00. (8) A motion was made, seconded and duly carried to receive and file draft minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization Study for Administrative Employees held on July 6, 1995. (9) (a) A motion was made, seconded and duly carried to receive and file draft minutes of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee Meeting held July 6, 1995. (b) A motion was made, seconded and duly carried to concur in the recommended actions of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee Meeting held July 6, 1995, as follows: PDC95-23: Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Miscellaneous Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-42, and Miscellaneous Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-49, for a credit of$18,941.00 to the contract with Pascal & Ludwig Engineers for two items of additional work L� and three items of deleted work. This item does not need Joint Boards approval. PDC95-24: Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Pioneer-Standard Electronics for the purchase of two new VAX 4000 Model 705A computers for Plant No. 2 plant automation for the Ocean Oulfall Booster Station, in an amount not to exceed $357,266.95 plus tax; and to delay to the September meeting any decision on the purchase of 32 Pentium Personal Computers, after competitive quotes have been received. PDC95-25: Consideration of motion to authorize the Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization Study to solicit, negotiate, award and issue purchase orders to various vendors for Modifications to the Existing Interior Office Space in the Administration Building for General Management, Administration and Communications Offices, Specification No. E-256, in an amount not to exceed $130,000 (reduced from the PDC recommendation of$165,200). (10) (a) A motion was made, seconded and duly carried to receive and file draft minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting held July 12, 1995. Minutes of the Executive Committee Page 5 of 6 July 26, 1995 (b) A motion was made, seconded and duly carried to concur in the recommended actions of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting held July 12, 1995, as follows: FAHR95-31: Consideration of motion to adopt Investment Performance Review Guidelines for the Districts' Investment Program. FAHR95-32: Consideration of Proposed Changes to the IRS-Approved Section 457 Deferred Compensation Plan as follows: (a) Consideration of resolution approving amendment to Deferred Compensation Plan for Officers and Employees in order to permit greater flexibility in plan distribution elections, clarify certain provisions of the Plan, and comply with certain recent Internal Revenue Service interpretations. (b) Consideration of resolution approving Amended Deferred Compensation Program for Management,Professional and Supervisory Employees, to include those positions in the former Confidential Unit in the program. FAHR95-34 Consideration of Amendment No. 13 re Agreement for Employment of General Counsel, incorporating increases in `d compensation in accordance with proposal, effective August 1, 1995, and subject to a cap in the CPI of 4% per year. (11) The following items were considered by the Executive Committee: EXEC95-01 PROPOSED CONSOLIDATION OF THE DISTRICTS: This item has been discussed many times in the past and staff has developed a proposed model for discussion. The action requested by the motion is to authorize staff to commence the LAFCO process which is not binding. One of the main issues is the agreement with IRWD now under negotiation. Staff indicated that these items can be resolved through ongoing negotiations and prior to finalizing the deal with IRWD. A motion was made, seconded and carried (6 ayes-3 noes) to receive and file Staff report regarding consolidation of the nine seprate districts; consideration of a resolution approving consolidation of the nine separate districts into one single sanitation district; with a single board of directors made up of one representative each for every city, sanitary district, water district and unincorporated portion of the County within the sanitation districts' service area and now represented on one or more of the existing nine sanitation districts; direct staff to initiate all steps necessary, including the LAFCO process, to complete a reorganization of the sanitation district as outlined in this motion and to continue negotiations with IRWD. Minutes of the Executive Committee Page 6 of 6 July 26, 1995 EXEC95-03 APPOINTMENT OF ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER: After noting that the FAHR Committee did not make a recommendation on this motion, rather it moved to pass the item to the Executive Committee, a motion was made, seconded and carried to approve filling the Assistant General Manager-Administration position at the top of the classification range and to so recommend to the Joint Boards. (12) CLOSED SESSION There was no need for a Closed Session. (13) OTHER BUSINESS (14) MATTERS TO BE REPORTED ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were no matters to be reported on at a subsequent meeting. (15) MATTERS ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT. There were no matters for a future agenda. (16) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING The next Executive Committee meeting is scheduled for September 20, 1995. (17) ADJOURNMENT The Executive Committee adjourned at approximately 8:16 p.m. Submitted by: n Tappan, Sec tary �0L 73085.MIN JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS AGENDAFOR JULY 26, 1995 Item (12)(b)(1): OMTS95-036: Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to enter Into an Engineering Feasibility Studies Agreement with the Southern California Edison "ENVEST" Program to study energy conservation measures at the Districts' treatment plants for an amount not to exceed $30,000. Summary Over the past five or six months, staff and Southern California Edison (Edison) have developed a series of energy conservation projects that qualify for an Edison program called ENVEST. In the ENVEST program Edison pays for engineering feasibility reports, design, and construction of energy conservation measures. The Districts would pay Edison for the project out of utility bill savings from the projects that are constructed. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Boards of Directors authorize the General Manager to enter into a first-phase feasibility report contract with Edison, for an amount not to exceed $30,000, to study energy conservation measures proposed by staff at the Districts' treatment plants. OMTS Committee Recommendation The OMTS Committee recommends that the Boards of Directors authorize the General Manager to enter into a first-phase feasibility report contract with Edison, for an amount not to exceed $30,000, to study energy conservation measures proposed by staff at the Districts' treatment plants. The one stipulation being that, before any additional money is spent, the item is brought back before the OMTS Committee for approval. Executive Committee Recommendation The Executive Committee concurs with the OMTS Committee recommendation. �.d COUNTY SANITATION DImius AI ORANGE COUNTY,CAUFORNIA June 22, 1995 1OW ELLIS AVENUE P.O.DOX8122 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA W72M127 (71a)%2-VI1 Staff Report OMTS95-036: Consideration of Motion Authorizing the General Manager to Enter Into Engineering and Design Studies and a Proposal with the Southern California Edison "ENVEST" Program to study energy conservation measures at the Districts' treatment plants for an amount not to exceed $30,000. The Southern California Edison (Edison) Company is offering a program called ENVEST to assist customers with the implementation of energy conservation projects. Edison will provide overall contract administration of the project including engineering and design studies and construction of cost effective energy conservation measures. The cost of the project will be paid by the customer on future utility bills, offset by the electricity savings of the project. The Districts' staff has reviewed the ENVEST program to see if there are projects that qualify and staff has been working with HDR, a local environmental �✓ engineering consultant, to submit a list of projects at Plants No. 1 and 2 for Edison's review. The submitted projects have met Edison's criteria for cost effective projects. The projects submitted are attached in HDR's letter of May 18, 1995. The energy conservation measures identified provide an estimated savings of 7,000,000 kilowatt hours annually. The electricity savings potentially represent about 7% of the Districts' treatment plants annual electricity usage. The specific projects are listed below: Plant No. 1: -Plant water system revisions -Trickling filter inlet piping modifications -Digester mixing control modifications -Dewatered sludge cake pumping modifications Plant No. 2: -Plant water system revisions -Modifications to the cryogenic compressor Based on the favorable review of the project, Edison has developed a Proposal Development Agreement for the Districts to contract for the ENVEST Program. OMTS95-036 Page 2 June 22, 1995 With the Districts' Boards concurrence, Edison will cause engineering and design studies to be prepared to further evaluate the energy conservation measure. The engineering and design studies of the presently listed projects are estimated to cost $24,000. Edison and the Districts will review the study. With concurrence by the Districts' Board and Edison, an Implementation and Financing Agreement would be prepared for preparation of plans and specifications, and Edison ultimately hiring a contractor for construction of the project. Staff will be involved at all levels to ensure compliance with Districts' needs, practices and requirements. The total investment is estimated to be between $1.5 and $2.0 million. Project payoff is estimated to be 5 to 7 years. Staff recommends the Districts' Board of Directors authorize the General Manager to enter into a Preliminary Assessment Agreement with Edison to evaluate energy conservation measures at the Districts' treatment plants at a cost not to exceed $30,000. a JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS AGENDAFOR JULY 26, 1995 Item (12)(b)(2): OMTS95-038: Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to approve Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with Ernst &Young to include services for development of documentation and provide training for conducting process improvement analysis of key programs within the Technical Services Department for an amount not to exceed $20,000 Summary At the January 11, 1995, Joint Board meeting, the Directors authorized Ernst & Young (E&Y) to conduct an evaluation of the Technical Services Department(TSD). The evaluation is complete and the final report is being prepared. A presentation by E&Y to the Directors on the finding and recommendations of the evaluation should be forthcoming. A finding in E&Y's report is that there are opportunities for TSD to refine the programs we manage in order to become more efficient and cost-effective. In order to address the opportunity, E&Y recommends that TSD conduct process improvement analysis to identify, and hopefully implement, what opportunities are available. The methodology for conducting this analysis is complicated and staff requires direction and training to implement it. E&Y has provided TSD with a proposal to conduct training on process improvement analysis and provide documentation for continuing this effort. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends authorizing the General Manager to approve Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with Ernst &Young to include services for development of documentation and provide training for conducting process improvement of key programs within the Technical Services Department for an amount not to exceed $20,000. OMTS Committee Recommendation The OMTS Committee recommends authorizing the General Manager to approve Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with Ernst&Young to include services for development of documentation and provide training for conducting process improvement of key programs within the Technical Services Department for an amount not to exceed $20,000. Executive Committee Recommendation The Executive Committee concurs with the recommendation of the OMTS Committee. June 21, 1995 STAFF REPORT OMTS95-038: Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to approve Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with Ernst & Young to include services for development of documentation and provide training for conducting process improvement analysis of key programs within the Technical Services Department for an amount not to exceed $20,000 Background At the January 11, 1995, Joint Board meeting, the Directors authorized Ernst & v.d Young (E&Y) to conduct an evaluation of the Technical Services Department (TSD). The purpose of this evaluation was to inventory the TSD's strengths and weaknesses, clarify the TSD's mission, goals and objectives, and develop an action plan to address those aspects of the Department that can be enhanced and to identify concomitant resource needs. E&Y kicked off its evaluation in February 1995 with a series of work-group focus meetings with key Department staff. The focus meetings were used to identify the main processes common to all TSD divisions along with defining the inputs/outputs, affected divisions, and customers involved with each process. This exercise has been valuable in providing a common denominator among the five divisions. E&Y's evaluation also included interviews with internal customers to TSD (i.e. Operations, Maintenance and Engineering), conducting a needs survey of all TSD staff, conducting a survey of external wastewater treatment organizations similar to the Districts to determine how they were organized and how they managed similar issues being addressed by TSD, and organizing a third work-group focus meeting involving the General Manager's office and other departments. The information gathered through all these meetings, surveys and interviews have been used to develop a draft report on the current status of the Department with recommendations on areas for improvement. w OMTS95-038 Page 2 June 21, 1995 E&Y's draft report has been sent to the TSD department for comments and is currently being finalized. We anticipate that the final report should be completed within the next few weeks and a presentation on the report should be made by E&Y to the Directors in the near future. The purpose of this staff report is to request further professional services from E&Y to develop documentation and conduct training necessary to implement recommendations by E&Y for evaluating where improvements can be made on the major processes and programs undertaken by the Department. Process Improvement Training E&Y has categorized the work conducted by TSD into five processes; namely, Regulatory Analysis, Program Development, Program Implementation, Program Assessment, and Reporting and Feedback. These processes are common to all the major programs managed by the five divisions. E&Y has identified several processes encompassing several of the major programs (i.e., Marine Monitoring and Laboratory Services) where improvements can be made to allow TSD to operate more efficiently and cost-effectively. An example of areas for improvement include development of clear procedures, defining clear roles and responsibilities, improving communication, development and review of reports and development of an effective feedback loop from the customers. The methodology for conducting evaluations of the processes to evaluate areas for improvement and develop action plans is complicated and time consuming and, therefore, direction and training is needed to ensure that staff implement this process correctly and cost effectively. E&Y has provided the Districts with a proposal to train key Department staff on techniques to conduct this analysis along with providing reference documentation that can be used by staff. E&Y's proposal consists of two all-day training sessions involving Department managers, supervisors and key staff. The training will focus on where improvements can be made for two major TSD programs. For each of the two major programs, the training will consist of objective setting, defining the current status, identifying root causes of problems, identifying value vs non-value tasks, brainstorming techniques for improvements, analyzing alternatives, brainstorming on the desired future state of the program and developing improvement action plans to get us there. Documentation of this process will then be prepared and made available to staff for conducting further improvement evaluations on other programs. OMTS95-038 Page 3 June 21, 1995 The total not-to-exceed cost for providing the process improvement training and development of the documentation is $20,000. The deliverables will be the current state, desired future state and improvement action plan for two major programs; training of all TSD Department managers, supervisors and key staff (up to 25 people); and documentation that will assist staff in effectively conducting further process improvements. The Directors have asked staff to place increased attention on the cost of the services we provide. The 1995 proposed budget reflects staffs initial attempt to identify performance measures that reflect the cost of doing business and to benchmark ourselves against similar organizations. The training proposed by E&Y will take us further in this direction by providing TSD staff with the tools necessary to evaluate and implement more cost-effective approaches to how we do business and/or improvements that result in a higher quality service. Recommendation Staff recommends authorizing the General Manager to approve Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with Ernst & Young to include services for development of documentation and provide training for conducting process improvement analysis of key programs within the Technical Services Department for an amount not to exceed $20,000. Ref#Jlwp\3510bperwmm\eytmg2.exe COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA F.O. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 N 10844 ELLIS. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 �+xcecW"� (714)982-2411 June 21, 1995 Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Ca .92708 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with Ernst & Young In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional engineering services, the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee has negotiated the following fee for Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with Ernst d.d & Young, providing services for development of documentation and provide training for conducting process improvement analysis of key programs within the Technical Services Department for an amount Dot to exceed $20,000. Existing Change per Amended Agreement Addendum Agreement Original Professional Agreement $85,000 Addendum No. 1 $150,000 $235,000 Addendum No. 2 60,000 295,000 Addendum No. 3 158,000 453,000 Addendum No. 4 20,000 473,000 T Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts of Orange County June 21, 1995 Page Two The OMTS Committee hereby certifies the above fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. /s/ Director Pat Mc Guigan /s/ Director Victor Lei zp�p' Director Pat Mc Guigan, Chair Director Victor Leipzig, Vice Chair OMTS Committee OMTS Committee /s/ Ed Torres �J Ed Torres Director of Technical Services OMTS Committee MBN:dm REF#J:\3500\510035A.LTR y JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS 9 �- AGENDA FOR JULY 26, 1995 ITEM (12)(b)(3): PDC96-24: Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Pioneer-Standard Electronics for the Purchase of Two VAX 400 Model 705A Computers for Plant No. 2 Plant Automation for the Ocean Outfall Booster Station (Specification No. E-257), in an amount not to exceed $357,266.95 plus tax. Summary The Planning, Design and Construction Committee discussed the status of the Plant Automation Computer System it has previously approved, and the factors leading toward a required upgrade in computer hardware at Plant 2. This upgrade will save the Districts' considerable time, money and effort. The formal proposal for the hardware was presented. Staff Recommendation Staff requested authority to proceed with final negotiations in response to a formal proposal from Pioneer-Standard Electronics, Inc. for the computer hardware upgrade of two existing VAX 400, model 300 computers to VAX 4000, model 705A computers for Plant 2 plant automation and the purchase of 32 DEC Pentium personal computers for Operations at both Plants 1 and 2, for an amount not to exceed $543,132.43 plus tax. PDC Committee Recommendation to the Executive Committee After discussion, staff was directed to delete the 32 personal computers from the project and bid them separately. The PDC Committee recommends authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Pioneer-Standard Electronics for Two VAX 400 Model 705A computers for Plant 2 plant automation, in an amount not to exceed $357,266.95 plus tax. Executive Committee Recommendation to the Joint Boards of Directors The Executive Committee concurs with the recommendation of the PDC Committee. J 1WpWPBSAGbb1-1Rl July 6, 1995 Revised July 13, 1995 STAFF REPORT PLANT AUTOMATION Summary The purpose of this document is to present to the Joint Boards of Directors both the status of the Plant Automation computer systems it has approved to date and the factors leading toward a required upgrade in computer hardware at Plant 2. This upgrade will save the Districts considerable time, money and effort. Finally, the formal proposal for the hardware upgrade will be presented for consideration at the conclusion of this report. Background The HSQ system was intended to only monitor plant processes - not provide control. In the years that have passed since the specifications were written, the facilities have expanded and the needs have changed. Distributed control (versus monitoring only) is .d now agreed to be a need in an ever-increasing attempt to be more efficient and reduce operating costs. This need for distributed control has resulted in an ever-widening gap between what was originally envisioned in the Master Plan and what is now required; a fully-integrated system with common operator interface at either the local Human Machine Interface (HMI) located at the Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) within the plants or any of the many computer workstations throughout the Districts. This proposed distributed control system could be easily expanded without any major changes in configuration, software or hardware. In January 1993 CH2M Hill was awarded a Professional Services Agreement for Job J-31. Briefly, this agreement was to provide engineering services for the preparation of construction and supporting documents, and to update the current operations and maintenance manuals. Also, it was to provide construction support and training for the project including the connection of existing PLCs to the SCADA system and a new PLC- based Ocean Outfall Booster Station(OOBS)control system, develop graphic displays and PLC programming guidelines, and modify existing and prepare new plans and specifications for the integration of remaining facilities into the plant computer monitoring system installed by Jobs J-23-1 and P2-04. Job No. J-31 was originally intended to finish what the HSQ system started. Later, when it appeared that control functions were needed, the project began to investigate making those changes as well. Serious questions arose as to the long-term viability of the HSQ system and whether it could be modified and expanded cost-effectively by contractors other than HSQ. In December 1993 the Engineering Department contracted with CH2M Hill to conduct a needs analysis (based on current requirements) to determine what would be required to move the system from a monitoring-only system to a monitoring and control system, as well lam/ as an evaluation of the HSQ/Miser system's compliance with specifications. The results of this study are found in a Technical Memorandum from CH2M Hill dated February 11, 1994, and "Job J-31 Addendum 1, Study Results and Recommendations"dated April 1994. CH2M Hill's Technical Memorandum mainly identifies the problems found in the original specifications. The"Study Results and Recommendations" study gives a broader view of the issues and, as implied by the title, gives specific recommendations of how the Districts could proceed. In brief, the study concluded that the HSQ system was unnecessarily complex, too slow and too inflexible to meet the projected needs of the Districts. The HSQ system, with the hardware configuration that was delivered and installed, may not meet the performance specifications for monitoring with the continued increasing number of PI-Cs above the original specification. The addition of more PLCs, HMIs and a combination of PC or VAX computer workstations onto the process control network in the future could degrade the system's performance to an unacceptable level. The most critical issue was the slow processing time. This was a result of the complexity of the hardware configuration, as well as the specified model of VAX computer supplied by HSQ. In July 1994 the Districts adopted Option 3. This option reduced the number of programming levels from five to three greatly simplifying the system architecture and system support requirements. The Joint Boards of Directors authorized the purchase of two Digital Equipment Corporation VAX 4000, Model 700A computer systems for Plant 1 and a software site license for Plant 1 and Plant 2 utilizing a Square D, Crisp 32 Process Control Application Package. In January 1995 installation of the VAX 4000, Model 700A began at Plant 1, and the first phase was successfully completed in March 1995 with five Modicon PI-Cs directly connected to the computer system. At this point all Allen Bradley data concentrators were removed from the Plant 1 system. Work has continued to date with eleven Modicon PI-Cs now on line. In addition, the J-28 Pump Station Telemetry System was fully integrated into the process control system reducing an island of automation. Further PLC integration will continue at Plant 1 until completion later this year in preparation for CH2M HILL's rewrite of PLC logic to the Districts' standards. Hardware Upgrade The computer hardware obtained in 1991 to support the Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS) and Computer Maintenance Management System (CMMS) (two DEC VAX 4000, model 300 computers)was replaced by two DEC Alpha AXP systems in February 1995. A proposal was made to upgrade them to VAX 4000, model 705As and transfer the current software licenses to the new models. Upgrading the units and transferring the licenses will result in a savings to the Districts of approximately $70,000 .. 2 and will result in replacing the current DEC VAX 4000, model 200 at Plant 2. `. This upgrade will be required for the continuation of CH2M Hill's work and to meet the goals and expectations of the Operations Department outlined in the Master Plan requiring a fully-integrated computer network. The new computer system will be required to be installed and fully operational before the start of construction of the replacement control system located at the Ocean Ouffall Booster Station (it is estimated that construction will commence early next year) if a fully- integrated system is to be achived thus reducing the stand-alone islands of automation. The upgrade will allow remote operation of this facility to be implemented thus reducing the need for in-building staffing by at least one operator per shift to do other duties. The use of Square D CRISP 32 process control software will standardize the process control databases of Job No. J-28, titled Pump Station and Telemetry System for Plant Nos. 1 and 2 and the Ocean Outfall Booster Station, allowing the Operations staff to monitor and remotely control processes within the plants from any computer workstation attached to the network and further reducing the software maintenance support requirements in the future. It is also important to note that all of the computer hardware provided by Job Nos. J-23-2 and P2-44 from HSQ will be put to good use. The utilization of computer hardware is shown below in Table 1. TABLE 1 Provided by HSQ New Use 2 VAX 4000-200 Servers Plant Automation software test bed to test software changes - one at each plant. (This is per a strong recommendation made by CH2M Hill's Results.) 2 VAX 4000-200 Servers Provide Engineering a loaner machine for consultants to verify PLC logic and software changes. 10 VAX 4000-VLC Reused on new process control system at both plants. 3 Recommendation The following recommendation is presented for consideration: �..� Staff requests authority to proceed with final negotiations in response to a formal proposal from Pioneer-Standard Electronics, Inc. for the computer hardware upgrade of two existing VAX 4000, model 300 computers to VAX 4000, model 705A computers for Plant 2 automation for an amount not to exceed $357,266.95, plus tax. SS:cs H:\WPDOCSGSNYDER\C0MMITTEIB0ARD2.SS 4 Proposal For: Orange County Sanitation District Fountain Valley, California Ms. Doreen Scarano Pioneer-Standard Electronics, Inc. Irvine Sales Office (714) 753-5090 July 7, 1995 QUOTATION 952P584559-02 15-Jun-95 QUOTATION EXPIRES: 14-Aug-95 TO: FROM: Orange County Sanitation District Pioneer Standard 10844 Ellis Ave 217 Technology Drive Fountain Valley,CA 92728 Irvine,CA 92718 Attn: Attn: Stuart Severn Doreen Scarano Account Executive Thank you for your inquiry. We are pleased to quote as follows: ITEM QTY MODEL NUMBER AND DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE EXTENDED 1 2 DV47RFA-FA $67,018.71 5134,037.42 Rackmount 4705A Adv Sry 128mb 1 694QL-C9 RKMT 4505A SBB 1 MS690-DA 128NM MEMORY 1 QL-005A2-60 OPN VMS BASE LI I QZ-00FAA-GZ SYS DOC SET I RF36E-AA 1.6Gb 3.5"DSSI 1 RRD43-JA 600MB CD Rom I KZQSA-SA Q-BUS ADAPT RRD 1 QI MCIA2-AA NAS 200 LIC I QL-XAIA2-AA VMS DW MOTIF LI Estim.Lead Time(Business Days)-20 Day Shipment Includes 1-Year System Support;5D by 9H;Digital Installed 2 2 B401X-A9 58,239.77 $16,479.54 Rack-mountable VAX/DS Q-Bus89 expansion enclosure. Twelve Q-Bus slots,four ISE positions. BA431 chassis including slides and brackets for mounting in 19"wide cabinets. Universal power supply. Bstim.Lead Time(Business Days)-22 Day Shipment Includes 1-Year Hardware Option Support -2- QUOTATION 952PS84559-02 15-Jun-95 QUOTATION EXPIRES: 14-Aug-95 ITEM QTY MODEL NUMBER AND DESCRIP71ON UNIT PRICE EXTENDED 3 2 QL-XULA9-BF $2,907.54 $5,815.08 OpnVMSN I/A 16 User License Software Product Descr.25.01 16 User License with Operating System requires the presence of an OpenVMS VAX Operating System Base License Estim.Lead Time(Business Days)- 1 Day Shipment Includes I-Year Layered Product Software License Support PAK Delivery Method:Paper 4 5 RZ28-VA S1,699.00 $8,495.00 SCSI Yard Disk Drive o 2.l-GB capacity 0 3.5-inch by 1.625-inch size o Mounted in a single %ftw, 3.5-inch storage building block snap-in carrier Estim.Lead Time(Business Days)-20 Day Shipment Includes 5 Years Warranty;Year I Onsite,Years 2-5 Return-to-Digital. Customer Installed. 5 4 H9702-EA S5,670.00 $22,680.00 UNSHIELDED 81"CABINET WITH 2 877-DA POWER CONT Estim.Lead Time Business Days)-30 Day Shipment Includes 1-Year Hardware Option Support 6 2 TZ86E-MX S4,753.00 $9,506.00 6GB SCSI tape drive embedded for DEC4000s. Estim.Lead Time(Business Days)- 10 Days Shipment Includes 2 Years Warranty; Year 1 Onsite,Year 2 Retum-to-Digital. Customer Installed. -3- QUOTATION 952PS84559-02 15-Jun-95 QUOTATION EXPIRES: 14-Aug-95 ITEM QTY MODEL NUMBER AND DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE EXTENDED 7 3 KZQSA-SA $2,234.00 $6,702.00 TLZ041RRD40 controller for BA2xx,BA4xx enclosures. Factory installed. Estim.Lead Time(Business Days)-10 Days Shipment Includes I Year Onsite Warranty. Digital Installed. 8 1 TLZ6L-VA $3,950.00 $3,950.00 4 Cb.DAT tape with multi cartridge loader.Fits in 5.25" snap-in carrier. Includes: Four cartridge magazine 5 data cartridges Cleaning cartridge Estim.Lead Time(Business Days)-40 Day Shipment Includes 1 Year Onsite Warranty. Customer Installed. Hardware Installation Service 5640.00 9 3 BC09D.06 $65.00 $195.00 SCSI Cable 0 6-foot length 0 50-pin high density to 50-pin low density connectors Estim.Lead Time(Business Days)-3 Days Shipment 10 2 2T-BA350-SF $883.00 $1,766.00 Front mounting RM BA350 includes BA350-SB,BA35X-HA, BN27S-03,rack-mount kit, nip-down front dress bezel and factory installation. Requires 7 inches or rack space. Replaces 2T-BA35X-FK. Estim.Lead Time(Business Days)-30 Day Shipment Includes 3 Years Warranty;Year I Onsite,Years 2-3 Return-to-Digital. Customer Installed. -4. \J QUOTATION 952PS84559-02 15-Jun-95 QUOTATION EXPIRES: 14-Aug-95 ITEM QTY MODEL NUMBER AND DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE EXTENDED 11 1 2T-BA350-SR $710.00 $710.00 Second BA350 back-to-back with 2T.BA350-SF. Includes BA350-SB,BA35X-HA,BN27S-03 and factory installation. Estim.Lead Time(Business Days)-30 Day Shipment Includes 3 Years Warranty;Year I Onsite,Years 2-3 Return-to-Digital. Customer Installed. 12 1 DEBMP-MA $5,635.30 $59635.30 DECSWITCH 900EE-six port Ethernet/IEEE 8023 bridge Two AUI and four 10BaseT front panel connections Operates in DEChub 900 MultiSwitch and DEChub ONE 8,000 addresses with source address,destination address and protocol filtering "Router ready"so that routing can easily be added in the future via a downline load into non-volitile memory when the routing cede is available. Estim.Lead Time(Business Days)-5 Days Shipment Includes l-Year Product Foundation Warranty Hardware Installation Service $400.00 13 1 DEHUA-CA $329.00 S329.00 DEChub ONE-90 Watts Single Slot DEChub-Ethernet with AUI connector,90W power supply,Hub setup port,Hub OBM port.Accepts one DEChub 900 series full height network module. US/CAN/JAP power cord. �.,.� Estim.Lead Time(Business Days)- 15 Day Shipment Includes l-Year Product Foundation Warranty Hardware Installation Service $300.00 -5 - QUOTATION 952PS845S9.02 IS-Jun-9S QUOTATION EXPIRES: 14-Aug-95 ITEM QTY MODEL NUMBER AND DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE EXTENDED 14 6 DSRVW-EC $3,374.60 $20,247.60 DECserver 700 Comm Server, 8 line RS232,4MB Memory, Network Access Softwre License,Accessory Kit, US power cord,manual, 120240V with FLASH Estim.Lead Time(Business Days)-5 Days Shipment Includes 1-Year Product Foundation Warranty Hardware Installation Service 5885.00 15 2 BC21M-09 $177.00 $354.00 Dual-Host Cable Fstim.Lead Time(Business Days)- 1 Day Shipment 16 1 QA-MCIAA-H8 5217.50 $2I7.50 Network Application Support 200 for VAX/VMS - DECneWAX Est PATHWORKS for VMS PATHWORKS for Macintosh Remote System Manager Client Rdb/VMS Run-Time Option VMS/ULTRIX CONNECTION UCX Software Product Dexr..36.96 Licensed Binaries and Documentation on Compact Disk (CDROM) Estim.Lead Time(Business Days)- 1 Day Shipment 17 1 QA-MCIAA-H5 $761.25 $761.25 Network Application Support 200 for VAX/VMS DECnet/VAX Ext PATHWORKS for VMS PATHWORKS for Macintosh Remote System Manager Client Rdb/VMS Run-Time Option VMS/ULTRIX CONNECTION UCX Software Product Descr. 36.86 Licensed Binaries and Documentation on TK50 Cartridge Estim.Lead Time(Business Days)-30 Day Shipment .6- QUOTATION 952PS84559.02 15-Jun-95 QUOTATION EXPIRES: 14-Aug-95 ITEM QTY MODEL NUMBER AND DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE EXTENDED 18 4 QM4rLAA-Al S178.35 $713.40 PATHWORKS V5 for DOS and Windows(LAN Manager) PATHWORKS DOS/Windows-based client using LAN Manager for file services Includes right to access PATHWORKS LAN Manager servers and use client software License:PC-style Single license per PAY. Software Product Desc:55.07 Estim.Lead Time(Business Days)- 1 Day Shipment PAK Delivery Method:Paper 19 1 FM-INSTL-12 $3,500.00 $3.500.00 This pan number is to be utilized for processing customer orders for hardware installation of DEC products purchased by the End-User from a Digital Authorized Distributor. Estim.Lead Time(Business Days)-30 Day Shipment 20 160 QS.96NA9-CH S140.00 $22,400.00 SYSTEMS ANALYST Estim.Lead Time(Business Days)-30 Day Shipment 21 l VT520-CA S456.00 S456.00 VT520 Text Terminal o Mullisession o Monochrome amber phosphor display o Supports ASCII,ANSI,and PCTerm protocols o 120 V/140V o Northern Hemisphere model o Power cord o No keyboard o No communications cable U.S./Canadian/Mexican/Central American model Estim.Lead Time(Business Days)-5 Days Shipment Includes 3-Year Product Foundation Warranty -7- QUOTATION 952PS94559.02 15-Jun-95 QUOTATION EXPIRES: 14-Aug-95 ITEM QTY MODEL NUMBER AND DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE EXTENDED 22 9 H0345-AA $795.00 $7,155.00 2MG FLASH CARD Esdm.Lead Time(Business Days)-5 Days Shipment Includes 1-Year Product Foundation Warranty 23 2 RF36E-AA $2,593.00 $5,186.00 1.6 GB 3.5"DSSI ISE/BA400 fac One drive,expandable to two All VAX4000's,except Model 100. Also for R400X. Factory Installed Estim.Lead Time(Business Days)-9 Days Shipment Includes 1 Year Onshe Warranty. Customer Installed 24 4 PV71A-BC S16,764.90 $67,059.60 VS4000-96 Base System Hardware includes: o KA49-CA CPU module O 54-21177-03 new CPU module o BA46A-B9 enclosure o Fear 16-MB parity memory 0 1-GB SCSI disk 0 600-NM CD-ROM c SCSI controller o Ethernet LCSPX graphics controller o Keyboard o Three-button mouse O Power cords o Documentation Software/licenses include: o OpenVMS V6.1 o OpenVMS 1-user license o NAS 150license Esdm.Lead Time(Business Days)-10 Days Shipment Includes l-Yr HW Onsite/Y2-3 Return to DigitaWO-day SW -8- QUOTATION 952PS84559-02 15-Jun-95 QUOTATION EXPIRES: 14-Aug-95 ITEM QTY MODEL NUMBER AND DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE EXTENDED 25 6 VRC21-HA $2,377.71 $14,266.26 Color Monitor Northern Hemisphere model o 21-irt W2D-iwh vertical screen o VGA2 to 1280 x 1024 at 72 Hz 0120 VIM o MPRII Includes I-Year Hardware Option Support SUBTOTAL S358,616.95 Hardware Installation Service $6,650.00 Less Quote Allowance Amours[ (S81000.00) (Trade-In of 2 VAX 4000/300 Systems @ S4000/ea r� NETTOTALAMOUNT $357,266.95 This quotation is an invitation in offer only.It shall remain firm until the expiration date shown,unless modified in writing by Pioneer-Standard Electronics,Inc.prior to our acceptance of your contract offer. This quotation is subject to credit approval and any contract arising from this offer will be subject in Pioneer-Standard's General Terms and Conditions. These terms and conditions are attached to this quotation or if not attached are available upon request. Export of these products required prior written authorization from the U.S.Department of Commerce. Quotation Prepared by: Pioneer-Standard Electronics,Incorporated Vr� -9- JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS AGENDA FOR JULY 26, 1995 Item (12)(b)(4): PDC95-26: Consideration of motion to approve the Ad Hoc Committee recommendations re Space Utilization Study for actions required to solicit, negotiate,award and Issue purchase orders to various vendors for Modifications to the Existing Interior Office Spaces in the Administration Building for the General Management,Administration and Communication Offices, Specification No. E-256, In an amended amount not to exceed $130,000.00. Summary The PDC Committee is charged with the overseeing of the Districts'Planning, Design and Construction activities. The PDC Committee has further established an Ad Hoc Committee to study administration space utilization for current and immediate future staffing requirements. The Ad Hoc Committee is also looking into long-term administration space needs. One of the Immediate administration space requirements concerns office modifications and reconfiguration for the two newly established Assistant General Manager positions and the added Administrative Secretarial staff which provides direct support to the two Assistant General Managers, and the reorganized Communications Office. The office modifications need to be started by the antl of July in order to provide adequate facilities for the above mentioned staff. By delegating authority to the PDC Committee for this work, a minimum of 60 days will be deleted from the solicitation, awarding and construction process. The work to be done will be performed in two steps covering a two or three week period. The first step will be the removal of the existing floor-to-celling partition walls. The partition walls will be reconfigured and remodeled to fit the new floor plan layout and to add glass where solid walls now stand . The second phase will be to remove the existing partitions and reconfigure It to fit the new floor plan layout. In addition to the wall and partition changes,the job will include installation of all electrical, communications, computers, and furniture necessary to support the staffing changes. This new office reconfiguration will utilize over seventy percent of the existing equipment and the Districts will need to order only thirty percent more equipment to finish the reconfiguration. The cost of the mentioned work is estimated to be$165,250.00. Staff Recommendation That the PDC Committee authorize the Ad Hoc Committee to solicit, negotiate, award and Issue purchase orders for modifications to the existing interior office spaces in the Administration Building, Specification No. E-256,in an amount not to exceed $165,250.00. PDC Committee Recommendation to the Executive Committee That the Ad Hoc Committee be authorized to solicit, negotiate, award and issue purchase orders for Modifications to the Existing Interior Office Spaces In the Administration Building for the General Management Administration and Communication Offices, Specification No. E-256, in an amount not to exceed $165,250.00. Executive Committee Recommendation to the Joint Boards of Directors "...� The Executive Committee recommends that the Ad Hoc Committee be authorized to solicit, negotiate, award and Issue purchase orders for Modifications to the Existing Interior Office Spaces in the Administration Building for the General Management,Administration and Communication Offices, Specification No. E-256, in an amended amount not to exceed $130,ODD.00. JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS AGENDA FOR JULY 26, 1995 Item (12)(b)(5): FAHR95-31: Consideration of Motion to Adopt Investment Performance Review Guidelines for the Districts' Investment Program Summarv: On May 24,1995,the Board of Directors approved the Investment Program Policy Statement recommended by the Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee. On June 28, 1995,the Board of Directors selected Pacific Investment Management Company(PIMCO)as External Money Manager,and Mellon Trust/Boston Safe Deposit 8 Trust Company(Mellon) as Custodial Bank,as recommended by the FAHR Committee. This agenda item presents recommendations for the ongoing monitoring, review,and reporting of investment program performance to the FAHR Committee and the Boards of Directors. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee approve the following actions: 1. Adoptthe investment performance benchmarks for the Liquid Operating Monies fund and forthe Long-Term Operating Fund as described in the attached staff report. 2. Adopt the contents and frequency of investment performance reports as described in the attached staff report. FAHR Recommendation to the Executive Committee That the Executive Committee recommend approval of the following actions: 1. Adopt the Investment performance benchmarks for the Liquid Operating Monies fund and for the Long-Term Operating Fund as described in the attached staff report. 2. Adopt the contents and frequency of investment performance reports as described in the attached staff report. Executive Committee Recommendation to the Joint Boards of Directors The Executive Committee concurs with the FAHR recommendation. J\WPWQBSUGBSUr-13fl5 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS N of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA July 12, 1995 108XX EWS AVENGE 00 BOX 0127 FOUNTAIN"My.CALIXORMA 82728.W7 01AI982-EAll STAFF REPORT FAHR95-31 Consideration of Performance Review Guidelines For the Districts' Investment Program Backaround On May 24, 1995, the Boards of Directors approved the Investment Program Policy Statement recommended by the Finance, Administration & Human Resources Committee (the "Committee"). On June 28, 1995, the Boards of Directors selected Pacific Investment Management Company (PIMCO) as External Money Manager, and Mellon Trust/Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Company (Mellon) as Custodial Services Bank, and authorized staff to negotiate professional service agreements, as recommended by the Committee. The Districts' Investment Policy designates the Committee as the oversight committee for the Districts' Investment Policy and Program, and states that the Committee shall adopt guidelines for the ongoing review of duration, quality, and liquidity of the Districts' portfolio. Also, the Committee shall review the Districts' Investment Policy on an annual basis, and recommend revisions to the Boards of Directors, as appropriate. Monitorina & Review Program Active monitoring and periodic reporting are essential to an effective, ongoing review process for the Districts' Investment Program. The agreements with the Money Manager, PIMCO, and the Custodial Bank, Mellon Trust, will require each firm to submit periodic reports to the Districts that will track individual investment transactions, as well as overall portfolio performance. The value of the Districts' portfolios will be marked to market each month. In addition, the Districts' Investment Advisor, Callan Associates, will measure the performance of the portfolios and the Money Manager against recommended benchmarks and report their findings to the Districts each quarter. The Districts' Money Manager, PIMCO, and Investment Advisor, Callan, will both meet with the Committee each quarter to review investment performance, proposed strategies, and compliance with the Investment Policy (Section 14.2). Districts' staff will coordinate these efforts and will provide additional monitoring and analysis using the Bloomberg financial information system. FAHR95-31 Page 2 July 12, 1995 lam/ Performance Benchmarks and Obiectives The overall investment objective described in the Districts' Investment Policy is to obtain a rate of return throughout budgetary and economic cycles, commensurate with investment risk constraints and cash flow needs (Section 13.0). The cash flow needs will be based on a five-year cash flow forecast, which will be updated quarterly, as required by the Investment Policy (Section 7.1). To ensure that the Districts' investment objectives are being met on an ongoing basis, the performance of the portfolio, and that of the Investment Manager, will be measured each quarter. The Districts' Investment Advisor recommends that the benchmarks described below be used to measure the investment performance of the Liquid Operating Monies Fund and the Long-Term Operating Monies Fund in achieving the objectives of the Investment Policy. Callan Associates recommends the use of two benchmarks for each portfolio. The first is a Market Index Benchmark which reflects the rate-of-return for investments with similar maturities. The second is a Peer Group Benchmark which reflects the returns achieved by other active money managers with similar objectives. The attached Callan report (Attachment "A") presents their analysis and rationale for the benchmark recommendations. The benchmarks are summarized as follows: �✓ Liquid Operating Monies o The 3-month T-bill rate will be the Market Index Benchmark for the short-term operating fund. o The Callan Active Cash Fixed-Income Style Group will be the Peer Group Benchmark for the short-term operating fund. Long-Term Operating Monies o The Merrill Lynch Government and Corporate 1 to 5-year Maturity Index will be the Market Index Benchmark for the long-term fund. o The Callan Defensive Fixed-Income Style Group will be the Peer Group Benchmark for the long-term fund. Ongoing Reporting The basic requirements for monthly reports about the Investment Program to the Committee are described in Investment Policy (Section 14.0). These reports, together with quarterly reports and the annual review, will provide the Committee with the information needed to evaluate risk, duration, quality, and liquidity characteristics of the Districts' Investment Program. v FAHR95-31 Page 3 `..' July 12, 1995 The attached matrix (Attachment "B") presents a reference list to the recommended contents of the monthly and quarterly reports that will be submitted to the Committee and to the Boards of Directors. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee approve the following actions: 1. Adopt the investment performance benchmarks for the Liquid Operating Monies fund and for the Long-Term Operating Fund as described in this report. 2. Adopt the contents and frequency of investment performance reports as described in this report. SKIc J1WPOOC'FlN`GMNE1'PC.MTG�PCB"l.T/FFRPr.FPC�AHR85.J1 Attachments JUL 05 '95 15;06 FR CRLLRN ASSOCIATES 30?. E32 I3230 TO SHNIT DIST-OR CT P.02 FAHR95-31 ATTACHMENT A V CALLAN ASSOCIATES INC RImiANN C MOOMY ,�(�/C•II I San Frcnnxo, Nev,York. Cnicaga A110Mo, Denver Vice Pt"cloM July 5, 1995 Mr.Steve Kozak County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 1OW Ellis Avenue P.O.Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Dear Steve, SUBJECT: Guidelines for the Performance Review of the Districts'Investment Program The purpose of my letter is to establish the benchmarks to use in evaluating the returns achieved by the investment manager. The recommended guidelines and benchmarks are provided in Attachment I. If the Board approves the recommendations, the Attachment is in a format suitable for handing off to the investment manager. This letter provides additional background d./ information and rationale for the recommendations. Benchmarks The performance evaluation of the investment manager will be based on the total returns earned on the fund, and by the degree of risk undertaken to achieve those returns. By total return we mean the return from income earned,realized gains or losses,and the change in unrealized gain or loss,based on market values. The need to account for unrealized gains or losses makes it necessary to mark-to-market the portfolio. Once the return has been calculated,it should be compared to a relevant benchmark. Given the short term volatility of financial markets,the pattern of returns earned on the fund is likely to be volatile. Thus, an absolute return expectation is not very useful for evaluating performance. Instead,an investment manager should be evaluated relative to returns in the financial markets over the relevant time period. In our view,each investment manager should be compared to at least two benchmarks: a market index and a peer group. The market index represents the universe of, securities that the manager could buy—it reflects the rentm available from a passive approach of holding all eligible securities.The peer group reflects the returns achieved by other active managers with similar objectives,operating in the same marketplace. Calian Associates has developed appropriate peer groups,referred to as Style Croups,through extensive research and the development of a comprehensive database. 550 East 91h Avern10 DeNMr CC'RVD? •.Y`.°.'of^.VI e .e-..are 1 ea- 11+1 JUL 05 '95 15:07 FR CALLAN ASSOCIATES 303 632 B230 TO SRNIT DIST-OR CT P.03 W Mr. Steve Kozak `�►' Page 2 July 5, 1995 An example of a market index is the Merrill Lynch Government&Corporate I to 5 Year Maturity Index. Since this index is a broad measure of the government and corporate fixed income securities with maturities from one to five years,it represents the universe of securities available to your investment manager.An example of a peer group is the Callan Defensive Fixed- Income Style Group. This style group most closely represents a peer group of active managers . that generate risk and return results comparable to that of the Merrill Lynch I to 3 Year Treasury Index, which is slightly shorter in duration than the I to 5 Year Maturity Index. The specific benchmarks proposed for the Districts' two funds are: Jrpuid Operating Monies The short-term operating fund will be compared to the 3-month T-bill rare and the Callan Active Cash Fued-Income Style Group. The Callan Active Cash Fixed Income Style Group represents a peer group of managers who operate with a maximum maturity of one year. Long Term QM=g Monks The long-term operating fund will be compared to the Merrill Lynch Government&Corporate I to 5 Year Maturity Index and to the Callan Defensive Fixed-Income Style Group. Blsk The investment manager chosen by the Committee is expected to add value through modest duration shifts,sector selection and individual security selection. It would be inapprog.iate for the manager to seek higher returns by subjecting the funds to higher risks. Therefore, the risk associated with each fund, as measured by the variability of quarterly returns (standard deviation), will also be monitored. The standard deviation of returns for each fimd should not exceed that of the benchmark index and the peer group by more than 20 percent. ` JUL 05 'gs i5:e7 FR CALLAN ASSOCIATES 303 632 8230 TO SANIT DIST-OR CT P.04 v �..� Mr. Steve Kozak Page 3 July 5, 1995 Over the Longer Term The focus of the Committee will be on achieving long term objectives. It is our observation that fiduciaries who keep a focus on the long term objectives achieve a higher degree of success in their investment programs. Quarterly performance will be evaluated for evidence of progress toward the attainment of long-term targets. It is understood that there may be short-term periods during which performance deviates from market indices. Over trailing three year and longer periods, each fund is expected to perform in the upper 50 percentile of the manager's style group, and to exceed the benchmark index with appropriate risk Dst[ation A rule-of-thumb for estimating the duration of a fixed income security of less than one year maturity is to equate the duration to the maturity. For example,a 90 day Treasury bill has a duration of 90 days (0.25), and a one year Treasury has a duration slightly less than 1. Thus,the 4/ maximum duration of 90 days specified for the Liquid Operating account in section 7.2.1.2. is fairly conservative,and is equivalent to a weighted average maturity of 90 days. The account could still hold a security with a one year maturity,but the account would need to counter the effect of the one year security by shortening the remainder of the portfolio. If the Districts also maintain some operating cash,the duration of the Liquid Operating account could be extended to 6 months,which is still conservative but would add a bit of additional return. The duration target of the Long Term Operating Monies account should be set equal to that of the benchmark.The duration of the Merrill Lynch Government&Corporate 1 to 5 Year Index is approximately 2.5. The duration changes slightly as interest rates change,and has varied from 2.43 to 2.53 over the last three years. The investment guidelines would permit the manager to vary duration by plus or minus 20 percent from that of the benchmark, which results in a range of 2.0 to 3.0. This guideline appears consistent with the amount of risk that the Districts are willing to assume,while still providing the manager with a useful tool for adding value. Yours truly, Ru C.Moom�> Vice President \,,,/ attachment FAHR95�31 ATTACHMENT "B" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING FOR THE DISTRICTS' INVESTMENT PROGRAM POLICY REFERENCE PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTIC REPORTING PARTY" PIMCO MELLON CALLAN 14.1.1 Cost and market value of the portfolio(monthly mark-to-market). M,Q M,Q Q 14A.2 Modred duration of the portfolio compared to benchmark. M,Q Q 14.1.3 Dollar change in value of the portfolio for a 1%change In Interest rate. M,Q Q 14.1.4 Percent of portfolio invested In reverse repurchase agreements,and a schedule which matches the maturity of such reverse repurchase agreements with the cash flows which are available to repay them at maturity. M.Q Q 14.1.5 For the Liquid Operating Monies account only,the percent of portfolio maturing within 90 days. M,Q M,Q Q 14.1.6 Average portfolio credit quality. M,Q M, Q Q 14.1.7 Percent of portfolio with credit ralings below A'by any rating agency,and a description of such securities. M,Q M,O Q 14.1.8 Listing of any transactions or holdings which do not complywilh this policy or with the California Government Code. M,Q Q 14.1.9 Time-weighted total rate of return for the portfolio for the prior three months,twelve months,year- to-date,and since Inception compared to the benchmark returns for the same periods. M,Q Q ADDL" Comparison of portfolio performance to market Index benchmark. M,Q Q ADDL" Comparison of Manager's performance to peer group benchmark. Q ADDL" Monitoring of organizational and structural changes of Investment management firm. Q ADDL" Audit portfolios for compliance with Investment policy guidelines. Q Notes 'M= Monthly Q = Quarterly ADDL=Monitoring of Additional Performance Characteristics JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS AGENDAFOR JULY 26, 1995 Item (12)(b)(6): FAHR95-32: Consideration of Proposed Changes to the IRS- Approved Section 457 Deferred Compensation Plan as follows: (a) Consideration of Resolution No. 95.80 Approving First Amendment to Deferred Compensation Plan for Officers and Employees in Order to Permit Greater Flexibility in Plan Distribution Elections, Clarify Certain Provisions of the Plan, and Comply with Certain Recent Internal Revenue Service Interpretations. (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 95-81 Approving Amended Deferred Compensation Program for Executive Management, Management, Professional and Supervisory Employees. Summary The Committee is being asked to consider two Resolutions. The first is to adopt an Amendment to the Plan in order to permit greater flexibility in plan distribution elections, clarify certain plan �✓ provisions and comply with certain IRS interpretations; the second is to approve an Amendment to the Deferred Compensation Program for District employees by revising job classification titles for eligible participants. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Finance, Administration and Human Resources (FAHR) Committee recommend approval of(a) the First Amendment to the CSDOC Deferred Compensation Plan and; (b)Amendment to the Districts' Deferred Compensation Program by revising the job titles of certain eligible employee classes. FAHR Committee Recommendation to the Executive Committee That the Executive Committee recommend approval of(a) the First Amendment to the CSDOC Deferred Compensation Plan and; (b)Amendment to the Districts' Deferred Compensation Program by revising the job titles of certain eligible employee classes. Executive Committee Recommendation to the Joint Boards of Directors The Executive Committee concurs with the recommendation of the FAHR Committee. J:1 W PpS.1BS�AG85N]1'188. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 0 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA July 12, 1995 1O E.S AVENUE Revised °O 2°A 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIOOXNIA 927284127 STAFF REPORT FAHR95-32 Consideration of Proposed Changes to the Districts' IRS- Approved Section 457 Deferred Compensation Plan as follows: (a) Consideration of Resolution No. 95-_Approving First Amendment to Deferred Compensation Plan for Officers and Employees in Order to Permit Greater Flexibility in Plan Distribution Elections, Clarify Certain Provisions of the Plan, and Comply with Certain Recent Internal Revenue Service Interpretations. (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 95-_ Approving Amended Deferred Compensation Program for Executive Management, Management, Professional and Supervisory Employees. In 1975, the Districts adopted our first Deferred Compensation Plan for the benefit of management employees. During the intervening twenty years, there have been four amendments to the Plan, principally to comply with changes in the Internal Revenue Service regulations, but also to expand the Plan to allow participation by all other employees and by the Directors. The Committee is being asked to consider two Resolutions. The first is to adopt an Amendment to the Plan in order to permit greater flexibility in Plan distribution elections, to clarify certain provisions of the Plan, and to comply with certain recent Internal Revenue Service interpretations. There is no added cost to the Districts by approval of this action. The IRS has issued certain opinions regarding (1) the ability of Section 457 Plan participants to delay making a decision on the desired form of benefits until shortly before benefit payments are to begin, and (2) the requirement that combination benefits (lump-sum plus distributions over time) cannot be paid in increasing amounts, with the result that any lump sum must be paid on the same date as the first distribution over time is made. Also, general counsel has suggested revising the plan-to-plan transfer provisions to make clear that transfers can be made either to or from another employer's Section 457 plan. y The second Resolution amends the Districts Deferred Compensation Program and is "housekeeping" in substance. The Resolution 1) clarifies job title classifications among the four groups (Executive Management, Management, Professional and Supervisory) that are eligible to receive this employment benefit. Several job classifications have had title changes since the last amendment to the Program Resolution. This amendment also adds the positions of Assistant General Managers and Director of Information Technology to the Executive Management Group and the positions of Human Resources Assistant (2), Executive Assistant II (2) and Executive Assistant 1 (7) to the Management Group. Each of these job classes has been separately and previously approved by action of the Joint Boards and this Resolution is to bring those personnel actions into concurrence wit the Deferred Compensation Program. The added costs for this Program have been previously reviewed and approved by the Boards. Recommended Action Staff recommends that the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee recommend approval of (a) the First Amendment to the CSDOC Deferred Compensation Plan and; (b) modifications to the Deferred Compensation Programs. GGS:lc J:IWPOGCIFlNL E�.WG�TAFFRPTFP TMR85.328 ` / RESOLUTION NO. 95-80 APPROVING AMENDMENT TO DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN FOR OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13, AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FIRST AMENDMENT TO DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN FOR THE OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES OF THE DISTRICTS WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 94-39, adopted by the Boards of Directors on April 13, 1994, the Districts approved and adopted the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California Deferred Compensation Plan as Amended 1994 (hereinafter referred to as the "Plan"); and, WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors desire to amend the Plan to permit greater flexibility in plan distribution elections, to clarify certain provisions of the Plan, and to comply with certain recent Internal Revenue Service interpretations. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13, and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California Deferred Compensation Plan as Amended 1994 is hereby amended as set forth in Exhibit "A," attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as though set forth herein at length, and as so amended shall remain in effect until further amended or terminated by Resolution of the Boards of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held , 1995. 2000.90919 1<9<3 1 FIRST AMENDMENT TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN AS AMENDED 1994 WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 94-39, adopted by the Boards of Directors on April 13, 1994, the Districts approved and adopted a revised deferred compensation plan, i.e., the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California Deferred Compensation Plan as Amended 1994 (the "Plan"); WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors desire to amend the Plan to permit greater flexibility in plan distribution elections and to clarify certain provisions of the Plan; THEREFORE, pursuant to Resolution No. 95- , adopted by the Boards of Directors on , 1995 the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County; California do hereby amend the Plan as follows: 1. Section 3.16 of the Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and the following language is hereby inserted in its place and stead: "'Required Beginning Date' shall mean the latest date that distributions are permitted to commence under Section 10.3." 2. Section 10.1 of the Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and the following language is hereby inserted in its place and stead: 1110.1 Termination of Employment by Retirement. The Participant is eligible to receive distributions of benefits, with respect to retirement, after the Participant has met the requirements for Normal Retirement and has retired from service with the Employer. The Participant may submit to the Employer an application for distribution of benefits under the Plan as early as the date he notifies the Employer of his intended retirement and as late as thirty (30) days following the actual date of termination of employment due to retirement. Pursuant to such application, the Participant shall elect one of the benefits payment options described below. Such election shall become irrevocable upon the lapse of the thirtieth (30th) day following termination of employment with the Employer due to retirement. Fallowing the Participant's termination of employment due to retirement and the receipt of such application, the Employer shall pay to the Participant one of the following benefits (expressed in terms of both payment option and commencement date) as elected by the Participant: PAYMENT OPTION - (a) Consecutive equal monthly payments over a period of 36 . 1 EXHIBIT "A" months to 180 months, as determined by the Participant; provided, however, that any such period may not extend beyond the life expectancy of the Participant or the joint life and last survivor expectancy of the Participant and the Participant's Category A Beneficiary. (This payment option may be satisfied through annuity distributions.) (b) Consecutive equal monthly payments for the life of the Participant or for the lives of the Participant and his Category A Beneficiary. (This payment option may be satisfied through annuity distributions.) (c) A single payment equal to the balance of the Participant's Investment Account. (d) A single lump-sum payment in an amount to be determined by the Participant, with the remainder of the Participant's Investment Account to be paid under either payment option (a) or payment option (b) above. COMMENCEMENT DATE OPTION - (a) The first day of the third calendar month following the month in which termination of employment occurs, or (b) The first day of a later month as designated by the Participant. In the case of payment option (d) above, the lump sum must be paid on the same date that the first payment over time is paid. DELAYED PAYMENT ELECTION OPTION The irrevocable election which must be submitted to the Employer no later than thirty (30) days following termination of employment with the Employer due to retirement may specify the elected commencement date option only, deferring the election as to the particular payment option. In such case, the Participant must later submit an election as to the payment option. Such later election must be submitted no later than thirty (30) days before the previously elected commencement date and shall become irrevocable on the date thirty (30) days before such previously elected commencement date. Should the Participant fail to timely submit a separate payment option election hereunder, the 208690019 2 Employer shall pay the sum in the Participant's Investment Account to the Participant according to payment option (c) above, on the previously elected commencement date. The foregoing options are limited by, and these payments shall be made subject to, the provisions of Sections 10.3, 10.5, 10.6 and 10.7 hereof. The total amount of any benefits paid pursuant to payment options (a) through (d) above shall not exceed the sum of the amounts deferred by the Participant, as adjusted for any earnings or losses thereon. Should the Participant fail to elect one of the benefits hereunder by way of an application for retirement benefits filed with the Employer within thirty (30) days after retirement, the Employer shall pay the sum in the Participant's Investment Account according to the "Benefit A" election previously made pursuant to either the Participation Agreement or a modification thereof. However, if there is no such previous election, then the Employer shall pay the sum in the Participant's Investment Account according to payment option (c) above on the Required Beginning Date." 3. Subsection 10.6.2 of the Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and the following language is hereby inserted in its place and stead: "10.6.2 When Participant Dies either before the Required Beginning Date or before Distributions Have Begun. If a Participant dies either before the Required Beginning Date or before distribution of his Investment Account has begun, and, if any portion of the Investment Account is payable to (or for the benefit of) a Category A or B Beneficiary, then the Employer shall pay such portion as follows - CATEGORY A BENEFICIARIES (1) if the Category A Beneficiary is other than the surviving spouse, the portion of the Investment Account payable to such beneficiary shall be distributed according to one of the following options: (a) Consecutive equal monthly payments over a period of 36 months to 60 months (but not exceeding the life expectancy of the Category A Beneficiary); (b) A single lump-sum payment; or moo 19 14631 1 3 (c) A single lump-sum payment in an amount to be `..✓ determined by the Participant, with the remainder of the Participant's Investment Account to be paid under payment option (a). Such distributions shall begin on the date designated by either the Participant or, if permitted by the Participant, the Category A Beneficiary, but in no event later than December 31 of the calendar year immediately following the calendar year in which the Participant dies. If payment is made under payment option (c) above, the lump sum must be paid on the same date that the first payment over time is paid. (2) if the Category A Beneficiary is the surviving spouse of the Participant, the portion of the Investment Account payable to the surviving spouse shall be distributed according to one of the following options: (a) Consecutive equal monthly payments over a period not to extend beyond the life expectancy of the surviving spouse; (b) A single lump-sum payment; or (c) A single lump-sum payment in an amount to be determined by the Participant, with the remainder of the Participant's Investment Account to be paid under payment option (a). Such distributions shall begin on the date designated by either the Participant or, if permitted by the Participant, the surviving spouse, but in no event later than the later of(i) December 31 of the calendar year immediately following the calendar year in which the Participant dies, and (it) December 31 of the calendar year in which the Participant would have attained age 70'h. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, if as of the date of the Participant's death, both the surviving spouse and another are Category A Beneficiaries, then distributions shall begin on or before December 31 of the calendar year immediately following the calendar year in which the Participant dies. If payment is made under payment option (c) above, the x000000re 4 \�,/ 148311 lump sum must be paid on the same date that the first payment over time is paid. CATEGORY B BENEFICIARIES (3) if the beneficiary is a Category B Beneficiary, which is a validly existing legal entity (such as a charitable foundation or the estate of the Participant), the portion of the Investment Account payable to such beneficiary shall be distributed as a lump sum on the first day of the third calendar month following the month in which the death of the Participant occurs. All elections (as to both payment option and commencement date)_ to be made under this Subsection 10.6.2(1)(2) shall be made by the Participant pursuant to either the "Benefit C" provisions of the Participation Agreement or a later written election delivered to the Employer before the death of the Participant. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, the Participant, in the Participation Agreement or such later written election, may specify that, following the death of the Participant, the Category A Beneficiary may elect, subject to the foregoing limitations, the form of payments and the commencement date of distributions. Any such beneficiary election, however, must be in the form of an irrevocable written election filed with the Employer no later than ninety (90) days following the date of death of the Participant. In the absence of any such timely election, the portion of the Investment Account payable to such Category A Beneficiary shall be distributed to him in a lump sum on the first day of the fifth calendar month following the month in which the death of the Participant occurs. If a Category A Beneficiary dies within six months of the date of the Participant's death and before the entire portion of the Investment Account allocated to him has been paid pursuant to this Subsection 10.6.2, then the remainder of such portion shall be paid to the contingent beneficiary, if any, designated by the Participant in either the Participation Agreement or a later written election delivered to the Employer before the Participant's death. If there is no such contingent beneficiary, or if the Category A Beneficiary dies more than six months after the date of the Participant's death and before the entire portion of the Investment Account allocated to him has been paid pursuant to this Subsection 10.6.2, then the remainder of such portion shall be paid to the estate of the deceased Category A Beneficiary. Any payment under this paragraph shall be made in a zW0-00019 IM31 1 5 lump sum on the first day of the third calendar month following the month in which the death of the Category A Beneficiary occurs. The Participant may designate a trust as his beneficiary under the Plan. However, in that case, any beneficiary of the trust, who is eligible to receive trust distributions on account of payments from the Plan, shall be deemed to be a Category A Beneficiary under the Plan. (For example, if the Participant designates as his beneficiary a trust of which his surviving spouse is the life beneficiary, and elects lifetime payments under option (2)(a) above, then for the purpose of this Subsection 10.6.2, the surviving spouse shall be deemed to be the Category A Beneficiary, and the terms of this subsection shall be applied by basing distributions on the life expectancy of the surviving spouse.) Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, a trust may only be designated as a beneficiary (and the beneficiary of the trust will only be deemed to be a Category A Beneficiary) if, as of the later of the date that the Participant submits to the Employer the election in which the trust is named as a beneficiary or the Required Beginning Date, and as of all subsequent periods during which the trust is named as a beneficiary of the Plan, all of the following conditions are met: (1) the trust is a valid trust under state law, (2) the trust is irrevocable, (3)the beneficiaries of the trust can be identified from the trust instrument, and (4) a copy of the trust instrument has been provided to the Employer." 4. Section 12 of the Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and the following language is hereby inserted in its place and stead: "SECTION 12: Assignments and Transfers. 12.1. Consistent with Section 8 above, no one, including the Participant, his beneficiary or designee, or any other person, shall have any right to commute, sell, assign, transfer, or otherwise convey the right to receive any payments hereunder, which payments and right thereto are expressly declared to be non-assignable and non-transferable. The Employer shall have no liability to either the Participant or a purported assignee or transferee, on account of any attempted assignment or transfer. In addition, except to the extent otherwise provided by law, no interest of the Participant in the Plan shall be subject to attachment, garnishment or execution, or be transferrable by operation of law, whether due to bankruptcy, insolvency, liquidation for the benefit of creditors, or any other cause. 2000-00019 6 1a 1_1 12.2 Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, the amounts deferred by a former Participant may be transferred to another Internal Revenue Code section 457 eligible deferred compensation plan of which the former Participant has become a participant, if the following conditions are met: (1) the plan to which the former Participant wishes to transfer amounts deferred is located within the State of California; (2) the plan receiving such amounts provides for the acceptance of such amounts; (3) the employer accepting the transfer funds gives written notice of its agreement to accept such transfer and assumes liability therefor; and (4) the Participant provides a written release to the Employer releasing the Employer from any claim or liability under the Plan after the date such transfer of funds occurs. If a Participant separates from service in order to accept employment with another entity which permits the Participant to participate in a section 457 eligible deferred compensation plan, and if the four conditions enumerated above are met, payout of benefits will not commence upon separation from service, notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, and amounts previously deferred will automatically be transferred to that other �. entity's section 457 eligible deferred compensation plan, to be credited to the Participant's account. 12.3 A Participant, who was formerly employed by another public agency located within the State of California, may transfer, to the Plan, funds from an Internal Revenue Code section 457 eligible deferred compensation plan maintained by that former employer, if that eligible deferred compensation plan permits transfers to other section 457 eligible deferred compensation plans and if the Participant complies with all applicable terms and conditions of the transferring plan in effectuating the transfer." 5. The Plan shall continue in full force and effect except as expressly amended herein. ]000. 19 148 1 1 7 RESOLUTION NO. 95-81 e. APPROVING AMENDED DEFERRED COMPENSATION PROGRAM FOR EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT GROUP EMPLOYEES AND MANAGEMENT, PROFESSIONAL AND SUPERVISORY EMPLOYEES A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2. 3. 5. 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING REVISIONS TO THE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PROGRAM FOR THE EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT GROUP EMPLOYEES (GENERAL MANAGER, ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGERS AND DEPARTMENT HEADS) AND MANAGEMENT, PROFESSIONAL AND SUPERVISORY EMPLOYEES OF THE DISTRICTS, AND REPEALING RESOLUTIONS NOS. 86-29 AND 87-113 WHEREAS, in conjunction with the Districts' Deferred Compensation Plan, the Districts, by Resolution No. 86-29 and Resolution No. 87-113, adopted by the Boards of e.. Directors on February 13, 1986 and August 8, 1987, respectively, have previously approved specified Districts' contributions to the individual deferred compensation accounts of the General Manager, Assistant General Managers and Department Heads (collectively described as the "Executive Management Group"), and certain Management, Professional and Supervisory employees of the Districts. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY DETERMINE, RESOLVE AND ORDER: Section 1: Contributions. A. General Manager and Assistant General Managers. That the Districts hereby approve a contribution of Districts' funds in the annual sum equal to V.d $7,500.00 to the respective individual deferred compensation accounts of each of the General Manager and the Assistant General Managers (the "Districts Non-Matching Funds Contribution for General/Assistant General Managers"). B. Department Heads. That the Districts hereby approve a contribution of Districts'funds to the respective individual deferred compensation accounts of the Department Heads in an annual sum equal to a maximum of three (3%) percent of the gross annual salary of each of the respective Department Heads (the "Districts Matching Funds Contribution for Department Heads"), provided that each such employee voluntarily withholds from his/her salary and contributes an equal sum to his/her individual deferred compensation account. That the Districts hereby approve an additional contribution (the "Districts Non-Matching Funds Contribution for Department Heads") to the respective individual deferred compensation accounts of the Department Heads, in an annual sum equal to three (3%) percent of the gross annual salary of each of the respective Department Heads, exclusive of the Districts Matching Funds Contribution for Department Heads, as hereinabove described, without the requirement of any matching contribution by the individual employees. That in the event the total sum contributed to the individual deferred compensation accounts of the Department Heads, comprised of the three (3%) percent Districts Non-Matching Funds Contributions for Department Heads, the three (3%) percent Districts Matching Funds Contributions for Department Heads, and the three (3%) percent matching funds contributions from the employee, exceeds the maximum ]000.000/9 151�1 2 ` / permissible dollar amount of deferred compensation, as prescribed by the Internal Revenue Code or U.S. Treasury Department Regulations, the Districts shall continue to provide three (3%) percent Districts Non-Matching Funds Contributions for Department Heads and three (3%) percent Districts Matching Funds Contributions for Department Heads to the extent that such total Districts' contributions do not exceed the maximum allowed by law, and the individual employee shall only be required to contribute such matching funds contributions as will provide a total of all contributions that will equal the maximum allowed by law. C. Management Professional and Supervisory Employees. That the Districts hereby approve a contribution of Districts' funds in an annual sum equal to the maximum of one (1%) percent of the gross annual salary of the respective Management, Professional and Supervisory employees (collectively the "Districts Matching Funds Contribution(s)for Management, Professional and Supervisory Employees"), to the respective individual deferred compensation accounts of such employees, provided each such employee voluntarily withholds from his/her salary and contributes an equal sum to his/her individual deferred compensation account. That the Districts hereby approve an additional contribution (the "Districts Non-Matching Funds Contribution for Management, Professional and Supervisory Employees") to the respective individual deferred compensation accounts of the Management, Professional and Supervisory employees, in an annual sum equal to two (2%) percent of the gross annual salary of each of the respective employees described herein, exclusive of the Districts Matching Funds Contribution for za 19 3 isr60L.1 Management, Professional and Supervisory Employees' amount hereinabove described, without the requirement of any matching contribution by the individual ..✓ employees. D. Vesting. That upon completion of three (3) years of employment with the Districts and three (3) years of participation in the Deferred Compensation Plan, all Districts Matching Funds Contributions then on deposit in the individual deferred compensation accounts of the Department Heads, and Management, Professional and Supervisory employees, and all Districts Non-Matching Funds Contributions then on deposit in the individual deferred compensation accounts of the General Manager, Assistant General Managers, Department Heads, and Management, Professional and Supervisory employees shall be deemed vested, and thereafter, all Districts Matching Funds and Non-Matching Funds Contributions deposited into the individual employee's deferred compensation account shall be deemed vested upon deposit. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, however, upon the death, or upon the Normal or Late Retirement (as those terms are defined in the Deferred Compensation Plan) of the employee, irrespective of the length of his/her employment with the Districts, and of his/her participation in the Deferred Compensation Plan, all Districts Matching Funds and Non-Matching Funds Contributions then on deposit in the individual employee's deferred compensation account shall be deemed vested. Once Districts Matching Funds and Non-Matching Funds Contributions have vested as described in this Subsection, they may thereafter be withdrawn to the extent otherwise permitted under the Deferred Compensation Plan. 2000.00019 4 157W 1 Section 2: This program shall be for the benefit of the employees comprising the Executive Management Group (General Manager, Assistant General Managers and Department Heads) and Management, Professional and Supervisory employees. The employment classifications of those employees are set forth on Attachment "V, which is incorporated herein by reference, and shall be terminated only by action of the Boards of Directors. In the event other classifications are added to the category of Executive Management Group and Management, Professional and Supervisory employees by action of the General Manager or Boards of Directors of Districts, said classifications shall be deemed to be governed by this Resolution concurrently therewith. Section 3: The General Manager and Director of Finance are hereby authorized to execute individual Deferred Compensation Participation Agreements with each eligible employee, and are further authorized to execute any and all documents relating to investment and payment transactions relating to the Deferred Compensation Plan, provided that such documents are approved as to form by the Districts' General. Counsel. Section 4: Resolutions Nos. 86-29 and 87-113 are hereby repealed, and the provisions herein shall become effective upon adoption of this Resolution. The provisions herein shall remain in effect until amended or terminated by Resolution of the Boards of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held 1995. IOOD00019 5 157M 1 ATTACHMENT "'I" EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT GROUP General Manager Assistant General Manager-Administration Assistant General Manager- Operations Department Heads: A. Director of Engineering B. Director of Finance C. Director of Human Resources D. Director of Information Technology E. Director of Maintenance F. Director of Operations G. Director of Technical Services MANAGEMENT Financial Manager Controller Accounting Manager Purchasing Manager Secretary To The Boards of Directors Engineering Manager Construction Manager Lab Manager Source Control Manager Chief Operator Maintenance Manager Personnel Supervisor Sr. Personnel Analyst Safety & Emer. Resp. Manager Senior Regulatory Specialist Environmental Management Manager Chief Scientist Training Manager Operations Manager Human Resources Assistant Executive Assistant II Executive Assistant 1 3WPO 0 inW t 6 PROFESSIONAL �.✓ Senior Accountant Accountant Principal Information Services Tech. Information Services Analyst Programmer Analyst Programmer Sr. Buyer Buyer Principal Administrative Assistant Sr. Administrative Assistant Engineer Associate Engineer III Associate Engineer II Associate Engineer I Principal Engineer Associate Principal Env. Specialist Project Specialist Principal Lab & Res. Analyst Scientist Personnel Analyst Safety & Emer. Resp. Specialist Regulatory Specialist .r Contract Administrator Safety Representative Senior Financial Analyst Financial Analyst Analyst Senior Maintenance Planner Planner 20060 * 7 �� 151fi0_1 SUPERVISORY ! Principal Accountant Information Services Specialist Software Specialist Supervising Buyer Warehouse Supervisor Engineering Supervisor Senior Engineer Chief Const. Inspector Supv. Const. Inspector Compliance Supervisor Lab Supervisor Senior Scientist Source Control Superv. Supv. Source Ctrl. Insp. Sr. Operations Supv. Operations Supervisor Training Supervisor Field Supervisor Foreman Security Supervisor Environmental Management Supvr. Safety Supervisor Principal Financial Analyst .J mo la e �i ..y JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS AGENDAFOR JULY 26, 1995 Item (12)(b)(7): FAHR95-34: Consideration of Amendment No. 13 to the Agreement for Employment of General Counsel, incorporating increases in compensation in accordance with proposal, effective August 1, 1995. Summary The General Counsel submitted the attached request for an increase in compensation proposed to take effect on August 1, 1995. The last review by the Board was performed in February 1992. The firm of Rourke, Woodruff& Spradlin continues to provide excellent legal services for the Districts, and there is no better wastewater agency legal counsel in the nation. Mr. Woodruff has been active in both AMSA and CASA. He has served as chair of both ..✓ the AMSA and CASA attorneys' committess and is presently on the CASA Board of Directors. Mr. Woodruff represents the Districts in a superior manner in legal matters both inside and outside the agency. He has an excellent relationship with Districts' staff and continues to exhibit enthusiasm and energy in his representation of our interests. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of Amendment No. 13 to the Agreement for Employment of General Counsel, incorporating increases in compensation in accordance with Rourke, Woodruff& Spradlin's proposal, effective August 1, 1995. Executive Committee Recommendation The Executive Committee recommends that Amendment No. 13 to the Agreement for Employment of General Counsel, incorporating increases in compensation and future annual increases equivalent to the Consumer Price Index but not to exceed 4%, in accordance with Rourke, Woodruff& Spradlin's proposal, effective August 1, 1995. JIWPWQ&4NGBB MMT AMENDMENT NO. 13 RE AGREEMENT FOR EMPLOYMENT OF GENERAL COUNSEL dad THIS AMENDMENT to that certain Agreement dated May 1, 1975, is made and entered into this day of , 1995, by and between THOMAS L. WOODRUFF, hereinafter referred to as "COUNSEL", who is an owner/member of the Law Firm of Rourke, Woodruff& Spradlin, a Professional Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "FIRM"; and COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, on behalf of itself and as agent for County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, hereinafter referred to as "DISTRICT. WHEREAS, the parties hereto have previously entered into an Agreement, whereby DISTRICT employed COUNSEL to serve in the capacity as General Legal 4✓ Counsel to DISTRICT; and WHEREAS, the parties hereto wish to amend said Agreement, as more particularly set forth herein. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, it is agreed between the parties hereto as follows: 1. Paragraph 4 of said Agreement is hereby amended to read: "4. Compensation for legal services by COUNSEL shall be as follows: (a) There shall be no minimum retainer paid to COUNSEL. (b) For all work attendant to those services set forth in Paragraph 3 above, DISTRICT shall pay FIRM at a rate of One Hundred 1 Eighty-Five ($185.00) Dollars per hour. For legal services rendered by other Principals or Senior Associates of FIRM, DISTRICT shall pay to FIRM at a rate of One Hundred Seventy-Five ($175.00) Dollars per hour. For those services rendered by Associate Attorneys of COUNSEL, who are members of COUNSEL'S FIRM, DISTRICT shall pay to FIRM at a rate of One Hundred Fifty ($150.00) Dollars per hour. For those services rendered by Paralegals of COUNSEL, who are employees of COUNSEL'S FIRM, DISTRICT shall pay to FIRM at a rate of Eighty ($80.00) Dollars per hour. (c) Effective July 1 of each year, the hourly labor rates shall be adjusted in an amount equal to the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index for the Los Angeles-Orange County Metropolitan Area, all wage eamers, for the period between June 1 through May 30 of the prior ... year. Each hourly labor rate shall be rounded to the nearest $1.00 increment. All of the rates listed shall include FIRM'S direct labor costs, indirect costs, overhead and profit. (d) For appearances by COUNSEL at conferences, symposiums or seminars on behalf of DISTRICT, DISTRICT shall pay FIRM at the rate of Four Hundred ($400.00) Dollars per day, or at the rate of One Hundred Eighty-Five ($185.00) Dollars per hour, whichever is less. (a) DISTRICT shall be responsible for and shall pay or reimburse FIRM for all costs and expenditures required or advanced by zoos 28 152531 2 COUNSEL or FIRM in the preparation for, prosecution or defense of litigation, including court costs, jury fees, witness fees, reporters fees, title reports, photographs, diagrams, maps and similarly-related items. (f) DISTRICT shall be responsible for and shall pay or reimburse COUNSEL or FIRM for the actual expenses of travel, food and lodging outside the County of Orange on the business of DISTRICT, and shall pay or reimburse COUNSEL or FIRM for all other necessary expenditures on the business of DISTRICT in the actual amounts so expended." 2. This Amendment shall take effect August 1, 1995. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed on the day and year first above written. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, on behalf of itself and as agent for County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California By Chairman, Board of Directors By Secretary, Board of Directors ROURKE, WOODRUFF & SPRADLIN, P.C. By Thomas L. Woodruff nw:a 200o-0002e 3 15253 1 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS AGENDA FOR JULY 26, 1995 Item (12)(b)(8): EXEC95-01: Consideration of motion to receive and file staff report regarding consolidation of the nine separate districts; approving staff recommendation to consolidate the nine separate districts into one single sanitation district; with a single board of directors made up of one representative each for every existing member city, sanitary district, water district and unincorporated portion of the county within the sanitation districts' service area and now represented on one or more of the existing nine sanitation districts; direct staff to initiate all steps necessary, including the LAFCO process, to complete a reorganization of the sanitation district as outlined in this motion; and to report back to the Executive Committee at future meetings regarding the progress toward consolidation. Summary Ord When the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County were originally incorporated in 1954, they were organized into a number of separate districts that generally followed the drainage patterns of the county. This approach followed the original concept developed by the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts in the 1920s. When the Sanitation Districts were new and planning new interceptor sewers into the existing and newly developing areas of their service areas, a localized approach made sense because sewer improvement bonds and the existing agreements between neighboring cities narrowed the focus of concern at that time. Our job then was to abate local sewer overloading, to extend sewer service to people on septic tanks and to retire the small treatment plants serving individual communities in the northern and central portions of Orange County. Every few years the question of consolidation is raised by the Joint Boards of Directors. In the interest of ease of administration, streamlining board procedures, maintaining the "books"and reducing costs, consolidation makes sense. Today, this may be more true than ever before. Our sewer system is well established. Todays focus is much more on the joint works facilities and the various regulatory issues surrounding them. Today, the wastewater management issues facing our service area are far more regional in nature than those early days when localized population centers were surrounded by large areas of orange groves and bean fields. Effective and coordinated governance is also an issue to consider. When the Joint Boards meet and vote on policy and budgetary issues, they vote as nine separate public corporations. We have been fortunate in the past that each of the nine Districts have generally voted in unison. Recently, the selection of Option A for the Comprehensive Settlement Agreement was approved 9-0 by the nine separate Districts. And the 1995-96 budget was approved by all nine Districts. But imagine the difficulties that would have been presented had there been a split in either of ` these two important votes. How would we have effectively resolved the legal or budgetary differences that split votes would have implied? `. Al the Joint Boards meeting of January 11, 1995, the issue of consolidation was raised and staff was directed to evaluate it and report to the Executive Committee. Staff reports were presented in January, February and June outlining the major issues. The attached staff report "consolidates' (sorry) these previous reports into a final comprehensive report and addresses the major issues raised by consolidation. There are major issues that consolidation raises: future user fees/property taxes, future ownership of the Districts' facilties now individually held by nine Districts, comingling of existing reserves and debts, and the make-up of the governing board. These are discussed and answered in the attached staff report. In summary, staff recommends that existing user fees and property taxes remain at their existing levels; that all equity ownership in the collection system and joint treatment works revert to a single district; that all existing reserves and debts comingle to the extent allowed by law and existing debt covenants; and that the governing board consist of one representative each from every city, sanitary district, water district and the unincorporated area of the county now having representation on one or more of the existing nine districts. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Executive Committee consider a motion to receive and file the staff report regarding consolidation of the nine separate districts; approve staff recommendation to consolidate the nine separate districts into one single sanitation district; with a single board of directors made up of one representative each for every city, sanitary district, water district and unincorporated portion of the county within the sanitation districts' service area and now represented on one or more of the existing nine sanitation districts; direct staff to initiate all steps necessary, including the LAFCO process, to complete a reorganization of the sanitation district as outlined in this motion; and to report back to the Executive Committee at future meetings regarding the progress toward consolidation. Executive Committee Recommendation to the Joint Boards of Directors The Executive Committee recommends that the Joint Boards of Directors consider a motion to receive and file staff report regarding consolidation of the nine separate districts; consideration of a resolution approving staff recommendation to consolidate the nine separate districts into one single sanitation district;with a single board of directors made up of one representative each for every existing member city, sanitary district, water district and unincorporated portion of the county within the sanitation districts' service area and now represented on one or more of the existing nine sanitation districts; direct staff to initiate all steps necessary, including the LAFCO process, to complete a reorganization of the sanitation district as outlined in this motion. J.W PD.^.QBSV MG@D)-03e9 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS • M ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA July 14, 1995 Imes EwsnvENUE Pa.eoz BTO STAFF REPORT rouNUIN VALuY.MIFCRm eErEeaiE7 m41M-Mn CONSOLIDATION OF THE Districts Backaround • The 1947 Formation Report recommended creation of Districts in accordance with the Sanitation Districts Formation Act and based on geography, existing facilities, and to a lesser extent, political boundaries. • Each District originally financed its own trunk sewers and share of joint works facilities capital and operating charges through the property tax levy. After Proposition 13, each District received a share of basic levy based on previous percentages. Over the following decade, user fees were imposed by each of the Districts to rover operating revenue demands. District 13, formed after Proposition 13, receives no property taxes. District 14 is funded by the IRWD. • Over the years, many cost-sharing agreements have occurred between separate Districts for construction and operation of collection facilities. Ownership "floats" between individual Districts depending on actual flows and needs. The equity share of each district is adjusted and rebooked (normally annually)to reflect its ownership interest in the collection facilities and joint facilities that serve R. • During 1981-82, the Grand Jury Commissioned Price Waterhouse to conduct a Study of Potential Restructuring of Special Districts in Orange County. • In 1982, the Grand Jury issued a report recommending that the Boards consolidate the then seven sanitation Districts into one district with Board membership based on a smaller group of elected representatives. • In 1983, the Districts' Fiscal Policy and Reorganization Committees evaluated the Grand Jury recommendations and submitted findings and recommendations to the Executive Committee. • In February 1983, the Executive Committee recommended that the Joint Boards adopt a policy urging that each member agency limit their representation to one. • In February 1983, Districts' General Counsel reported the following consolidation options: 1) Make no change in the District organization. 2) Consolidate the present seven Districts into one single District. 3) Consolidate the present seven Districts into three Districts. 4) Retain the present organization with no consolidation and urge each member to send only one representative. 5) By Districts Resolution, limit the compensation payable per meeting to the equivalent of one Director per agency. Staff Report July 14, 1995 � Page 2 • In April 1983, the Joint Boards of Directors adopted Resolution No. 83-84 urging each of its member agencies to have a single director represent the agency and approved in concept the consolidation of Districts into one. • In July 1983, the Joint Boards reviewed several organizational alternatives include: 1) Consolidation into one District with establishment of an appropriate number of zones (co-terminus with existing District boundaries) for separate financing of specified O&M, capital or debt retirement activities. 2) Consolidation into one District with no zones. 3) Consolidation into three "super-Districts", defined by recent engineering studies (District 1, the northern half of District 6 and District 7; Districts 2, 3 and 11; and District 5 and southern half of District 6). 4) Retain the existing organization structure of the (then) seven separate Districts. Several members expressed concern that Directors' responsibilities to their constituencies would be impaired and local control would be lost by consolidation. If consolidation were to take place, Committee members would favor the zone concept for financing certain activities. This would reduce the then estimated $85,000 annual savings of consolidating. The Joint Boards determined that the Districts'operations were functionally consolidated and no �..✓ significant overall benefit would accrue by reorganizing into a single District. • In 1984 and 1985, Districts 13 and 14 were formed, adding new member agencies and additional Directors. • In 1994, membership of the Boards of Directors was reduced by most represented agencies voluntarily limiting their representation to one individual. Huntington Beach and Newport Beach, the only cities sitting on their respective Boards, still send two each to maintain three seats on their Boards. The Board of Supervisors, which sit on all nine Boards, have two representatives. Discussion of Consolidation Issues (Assuming a Single Sanitation District) Administration • Simplified Board Secretary, recordkeeping, budget preparation and procurement requirements. • Districts' staff cost savings approximately$55,000. Governance • Consolidation is attractive because it streamlines procedural matters and reduces the cost of governance. • Consolidation eliminates the multiple vote status that some Directors now possess. Staff Report yi July 14, 1995 Page 3 • Existing problem of split votes is eliminated. • Potential costs of a split vote that fractures the Districts over a significant policy or financing issue can't be estimated. Property Tax Revenues • Would remain as is. Districts 13 and 14 do not receive property tax revenues. Other Districts receive slightly different shares of basic levy, based on pre Proposition 13 rates. Users all pay the same 1% basic levy. • No fiscal impact. User Fee Revenues • Potential to level-out user fees throughout the entire service area, or to adjust them to balance against variations in property taxes or to maintain them at existing levels until subsequently adjusted by action of board. • A potential loss in property taxes resulting from a "raid" by the stale or others would necessitate an increase in any case in all Districts except 13 and 14. • Potential increased revenue demands in the future will require increases in user fees. Increases have been projected in the 2020 plan and the budget but no increase has been adopted by the Boards for the last three years. • Staff recommends that user fees remain as is at the present level for the time being. The Board can evaluate changes in the future. • Some Districts could experience user fee reductions/gains in the future if the board decided to level rates. For example, District 13 now has $100 user fees and District 7 has$50. Equalizing could occur over time by increasing the lower rates, dependent on property tax availability. Accountino • No need for separate District accounting. • No need for numerous accounting ledgers for shared trunk sewers or to adjust equity share in joint facilities which are adjusted annually now based on last 36 months actual flow. Independent auditor and Districts' staff cost savings would be approximately$67,000. Contractual • A consolidated District would assume previous Districts' contracts. • Legal and administrative costs reduction would be limited. Le a • No inter-District agreements. • Legal costs reduction of approximately$5,000. • Attached is an Executive Report from Counsel on Institutional Alternative Available under `✓ California Law for the Public Ownership and Operation of Wastewater Control Facilities. Staff Report July 14, 1995 Page 4 Regional Services • Sewer services would be provided on a system-wide basis—no distinction for operational costs by locality. This is now true in the larger Districts. • Potential for higher cost localities to pay less than fair share and vice versa. However, this is already true in the larger Districts. • No"inter District" sewer use charges and/or revenues. Cash and Reserves • Cash and reserves levels of individual Districts would be commingled. • Some Districts have accumulated more/less cash and reserves—same Districts would gain/ lose in total. Today the per capital reserves range from $18 to $937, depending upon the District. The August reserve is $216 per capita. Board Membership • Discussions by the Board at previous meetings seem to lean toward maintaining representation by each of the 26 public entities now represented on the boards with appointment procedures remaining as they now are. This provides home rule on one hand while addressing regional issues on the other. • Board membership would decrease from 30 to 26 with the loss of double representation from Huntington Beach, Newport Beach, Yorba Linda and the County. • Board compensation costs would decrease approximately$10,000 per year. Connection Fees • Connection fees are now uniform agency-wide at$2350 per dwelling unit and could remain that way. • Connection fees must (and do) meet the"fair share"test of the Clean Water Act. Future increases which are adopted by the board from time to time could remain uniform agency- wide. • No fiscal impact. Lono-Term Debt • The consolidated district would assume obligations of each district. • Some Districts have incurred more/less debt than others. Some Districts would gain/lose total liabilities. • Finance Rating Agencies would no longer review Districts for the potential weak district and could improve our overall credit rating. • No need for Mutual Benefit Advances Agreement (the "step up" requirement that solvent Districts bail out financially incapable Districts)—potential for rating upgrade with resultant savings in interest or loan insurance. Trustee fees would drop by approximately$16,500. Staff Report July 14, 1995 Page 5 Engineerina • Limited or no impact on engineering decisions. • No fiscal impact. Operations and Maintenance • No change. • No fiscal impact. Class III Industrial Waste User Fees • Class III industrial/commercial user fees range from $703 to $1,037 per million gallons depending upon the District, averaging $933. • Class III industrial/commercial annual user fees range from $162 to $62,655 per year. The average annual fee is $3,415. • Some users would experience increases/decreases in user fees, but the differential would not be major. • Class III industrialicommercial user fees would become a gal rate in the future— approximately today's average $933 per million gallons. District-Specific Services Cost Issues • Each District has unique costs of operation. For instance: ♦ District 3 has a sulfide control program that utilizes chemicals with attendant added costs. ♦ District 5 has pumping stations that add construction, operation and maintenance cost. ♦ District 7 has local collection system which we maintain. • Each District has unique operating conditions within the District: ♦ Portions of Districts 2 and 3 adjacent to plant, portions 20 miles away. ♦ Portions of District 5 flow are pumped, balance is gravity flow. ♦ Portions of District 6 flow to Plant 1, balance to Plant 2. Should We Consider Revenue Zones for the Consolidated District? • Revenue zones are currently authorized under the Sanitation Districts Act. • Revenue zones would permit the creation of varying revenue and expenditure zones analogous to assessment Districts. Such zones could be drawn in any configuration in accordance with revenue requirements. Staff Report July 14, 1995 Page 6 • Revenue zones would eliminate the accounting, legal/administrative and financing cost savings advantages identified with consolidation (i.e. nine revenue zones would have costs approximately equivalent to nine Districts). • While there are some differences in the cost of operation from district to district , this is also true within individual Districts, as pointed out above. Therefore the equity improvements that revenue zones might imply would not address new inequities any more than they address existing inequities. • Many public services (i.e. fire, police, transportation, trash) are paid uniformly by the user community, while the level of service actually provided to the user community is quite variable, depending upon type of building, neighborhood, distance traveled or purchasing habits. • We do meet the fair-share test of the federal Clean Water Act today • Staff recommends that revenue zones not be used. Summary Governance would be improved by having the governing body voting as a single unit instead of U nine separate public corporations. The net membership of the Boards would be reduced from the existing 30 to 26, with each public entity now represented on the board maintaining its representation. • The consolidation of the Districts could achieve a leveling of revenues and expenditures among the nine separate Districts. • The implications of this leveling have been depicted by District in the attached tables . • Cost savings of up to$144,000 per year can be achieved from the various accounting, legal/administrative and financial savings so far identified. • Connection fees will not be affected by consolidation. _ • Total Class III industrial/commercial user fees will change insignificantly but fees for a particular user may change up to 19% by consolidation. • Revenue zones would reduce some or all cost savings since they would imply a new set of legal/administrative and financing requirements. • Existing Districts have differing operating costs compared to one another as reflected in the '95/96 budget and illustrated in this report but that is true within each District as well. Staff Report July 14, 1995 Page 7 Recommendation Staff recommends consideration of motion to receive and file staff report regarding consolidation of the nine separate Districts; consideration of a resolution approving the consolidation of the nine separate Districts into one single sanitation district; with a single board of directors made up of one representative each for every city, sanitary district, water district and unincorporated portion of the county within the Sanitation Districts' service area and now represented on one or more of the existing nine Sanitation Districts; direct staff to initiate all steps necessary, including the LAFCO process, to complete a reorganization of the Sanitation District as outlined in this motion; and to report back to the Executive Committee at future meetings regarding the progress toward consolidation. BPA:jt �awroocicMwesanrswr+sai.srt �ae� c 1994-95 BUDGETED FLOW 30,000 25,000 O1 2 O J J 20,000 . Z O J J 15,000 - Z 3 0 LL 10,000 J F 0 5,000 0 + +- ■ 1 2 3 5 6 7 11 13 14 DISTRICT NUMBER CONSOL7.XLC 7113195 COMPARISON OF 1994-95 OPERATING EXPENSES 60 z 0 50 w a c w w 40 z z 6 30 C7 z Q w 20 0 a Z 10 z 0 + + + t 1 2 3 5 6 7 11 13 14 DISTRICT NUMBER ■9 Districts OConsolideted CONSOL6.XLC_7/13/95 COMPARISON OF SEWER SERVICE USER FEE PER PERSON 70 60 z 0 ¢ 50 w a w n 40 w w LL w 30 z 20 z a 10 1 2 3 5 6 7 11 13 14 DISTRICT NUMBER ■9 Districts OConsolidatad CONSOL8.XLC_7/13/95 COMPARISON OF SECURED PROPERTY TAXES 45 40 Z 35 O N w 30 a m 25 N W X F 20 - C] W j 15 U w y 10 - 5 - 1 2 3 5 6 7 11 13 14 DISTRICT NUMBER [n9 Districts OConaolideted CONSOL9.XLC_7/13/95 1 1 COMPARISON OF LONG TERM DEBT 500 450 z 400 0 w 350 a w 300 a w 250 0 2 200 0 150 z 0 100 50 0 - i - � - 1 2 3 5 6 7 11 13 14 DISTRICT NUMBER ■9 Districts OCnnsolideted CONSOL5.XLC 7/13195 COMPARISON OF CLASS III INDUSTRIAL/COMM USER FEES 1200 - y 1000 Z O Q u 800 Z O J_ 600 w a w u 400 Q z 2 Z ¢ 200 0 — r 1 2 3 5 6 7 11 13 14 DISTRICT NUMBER ■9 Districts OConsolidated CONSOL4.XLCJ/13/95 ( t � COMPARISON OF TAXES PLUS USER FEES 100 90 Z y 80 W a 70 w y 60 W 50 N 40 30 w a 20 10 0 1 2 3 5 6 7 11 13 14 DISTRICT NUMBER ■9 Dlatricta OConaolidated CONSOLII.XLC_7Fl3195 Property Taxes and SFR User Fee Per Person 70 60 50 `n i 40 `w n 30 6 20 10 0 a 1 2 3 5 6 7 11 13 14 District Number ■Tax Per Person ■Use Fee Per Person OConsolideted Avg Fee & Tex Per Person 7tl3195_CONSOLI0.XLC COMPARISON OF JULY 1994 CASH RESERVES 11000 900 800 0 700 N i 600 ¢ a 500 y w > 400 N � 300 200 100 0 1 2 3 5 8 7 11 13 14 DISTRICT NUMBER 09 Districts OConsolidated CONSOL3.XLC_7/13/95 137-14-9t I I:IUM rxUM 8UU6A11, WVUUCUrr, Jrttx N eaZwao I uuu uo i Executive Report Institutional Alternative Available Under California Law for the Public Ownership and Operation of Wastewater Control Facilities The Board has expressed interest in the procedures available for possible consolidation of the nine county sanitation districts into one county sanitation district. The Board has also expressed an Interest in what other alternatives exist under California law for the public ownership and operation of wastewater control facilities. This report provides an overview description of each of the institutional alternatives. Information concerning the method of formation, governance, structure, powers, and operating capabilities is provided. Examples of existing agencies formed under each of the particular enabling ads are provided where applicable. 1. Sanitary District The powers of a sanitary district are similar to the powers of the County Sanitation District The formation of a district is initiated by petition of not less than 25 persons living in the proposed district. The proposed district must be natural watershed area. After the formation proceedings have been initiated, LAFCO must conduct a notice of public hearing at which the commission might either approve, modify or deny the proposed formation. If approved, the proposed formation is sent to the County Board of Supervisors to conduct an Authority hearing, at which the Board may either terminate further proceedings or call for an election. If an election is proposed, a majority vote of the qualified voters is required to create the district. The Board of Directors of a sanitation district are elected at large. The governing body would consist of a representative from each of the participating member communities. Oro Loma Sanitation District, in the East Bay Area of San Francisco is an example of a regional facility operating under this form of governance. 2. Sanitation and Flood Control Districts Various organizations created by the legislature have innovated functions in the use and control of water. There are several general legislative acts providing for districts whose principal function Is the control of flood water and to provide for a complete and comprehensive sewage disposal system. A sanitation and flood control district Is an example of this type of dual purpose institution. far/ -1- 117-14-9b I1: 111Aa ?KUM xuuxix, muuxurr, arxx lu socwoo ruuJiuui The great majority of the flood control districts now functioning in the state were organized by special acts. The special act legislation provides the institutional participants with the opportunity to customize the powers, governance, ownership and financing to meet the public service needs of their constituents. This legislative approach provides considerable flexibility. An example of this is Vallejo Sanitation and Flood Control District The Act gives Vallejo broad powers in the performance in its duties. 3. Sewer and Sewer Maintenance Districts A sewer and sewer maintenance district can be formed in any portion of the county, whether incorporated or unincorporated, In which lateral or Collecting sewers have been installed for the maintenance and repair of the sewer lines. The County Board of Supervisors has the powers to form a dlatrict If the Board believes such action would be in the best interests of county residents. The formation process begins with the County Board of Supervisors determining, through resolution, that the proposed area is in need of sewer maintenance and should be forted into a district. The Board of Supervisors then calls for a noticed public hearing for public input. At the conclusion of the hearing process, the Board can approve the formation of a district entity. Once formed,the governing body of the district Is the County Board of Supervisors. The Board of Supervisors is responsible and has authority for all decisions related to the district The governance process follows the structure and policies of the �= existing county governance process. The exisfing enabling ad for sewer and sewage maintenance districts only provides powers to clean, repair, reconstruct, renew, replace, operate and maintain lateral and connecting sewers. Financial powers are also limited through legislation. Several sewer districts have sought corrective legislative action to allow for the construction and operation of treatment plants and to give them broader financial powers to issue dead instruments for capital facilities financing. An example of a district formed of a sewer and sewer maintenance district with corrective legislative action is Fairfield-Sulsun Sewer District in Norther California. 4. Water Districts Water Districts may be formed under any of more than 30 general ads, in addition, a large number have been created by special acts. The chief function of a district Is to supply water for irrigation to land owners within its boundaries. A water district is authorized to acquire and construct the necessary works for production and distribution of water. In addition, several districts also have powers with respect to sewage, fire protection, flood or storm water, and water reclamation. ronocoma U'f-14-lIh II:IUAM YGUI/ fuuaaa, wuuvaure, uraa ru JULUJJU a. County Water Disid The formation of a County Water district is instituted by petition and requires signatures of at least 10% of the voters and 10% of the voters of each municipal corporation Included within the territory of the proposed district. If it is approved, It Is forwarded to the County Board of Supervisors. If the Board of Supervisors determines that the proposed district is in the public interest, it calls for an election on the next established election date. Upon approval by a majority of the district's voters, proposed district and cities included within the district, the district is formed. The main distinctions between County Water Districts and County Sanitation Districts include: - Governing body: which is currently limited to a five member board, and - Service capabilities: County Water Districts can provide water services which is not possible under the present County Sanitation District Legislation. San Marcos County Water District is an example of an operational Water District within the State of California. San Marcos provides potable water, sewerage service and reclaimed water to a portion of Northern San Diego County. b. California Water District California Water Districts are formed by a complex petition process. The holders of title to the majority of landholders that will benefit from the proposed water services must sign a petition document to initiate the formation process. The petition, once completed, is then forwarded to LAFCO for review and final approval. A California Water District has essentially the same powers as county water districts, including the power to treat and dispose of sewage and waste or storm water. Moulton Niguel Water District in Orange County was formed as a California Water District and represents an example of this type of Water District. 5. Community Services District There are some 278 community service districts In the state providing a broad base of services ranging from library construction and operation, to the collection, treatment, or disposal of sewage, waste or stone water. Yaooao U 'sow i -3- U1-14'99 11:111M reum 6eU3116, nuuuwrr, oun lu au'ue+u - ..- . The people of any continuous unincorporated territory, within one or more counties, �✓ may form a community service district by submitting a petition to LAFCO, who then conducts a noticed public hearing. If the formation is approved by the commission, LAFCO will direct the County Board of Supervisors to call an election to determine whether the district should be formed. However, if the formation petition filed with the Board of Supervisors contains the signatures of 60% of the registered voters within the proposed district, the Board may order the formation without an election. The district's board is composed of three or five members, as set forth in the formation petition, and is elected at large. However, the petition for formation may state as an alternative that the County Board of Supervisors shall constitute the Board of Directors. Community Service Districts are usually used for multi-purpose rural organizations such as the Big Bear Community Services District 6. Utility Districts Public Utility District A Public Utility District can only be organized in unincorporated territory. This restriction limits the applicability of the Public Utility District institution in many service environments. The Public Uglily District has similar powers to acquire, construe and operate works for supplying utilities, to purchase from other utilities the services or commodities .r furnished by It, and to sell surplus water or power. The number of members on board of directors varies, depending on whether the district lies entirely in one county, and the number of territorial units in the district. Many of the districts surrounding take Tahoe were formed as public utility districts (i.e. South Tahoe Public Utility District). 7. Joint Powers Agreement The Joint Exercise of Powers Act allows two or more public agencies to enter into an agreement to jointly exercise any power they hold In common (JPA). The JPA represents a contractual arrangement between the members of the JPA arrangement and can be configured to meet the unique need of its members. Of the 54 statutory types of special districts, the JPA is the second most popular form of governance after the County Service Area. The governance structure, operational responsibilities, and the financing options are relatively flexible under the JPA structure. The Act gives the contracting agencies the option of contracting to use existing governing boards for the governance structure or to use a separate governing entity established at the time of formation. This separate entity can be authorized to exercise independently the powers those parties hold in common and delegate to it This.allows for central administration and streamlines decision making. + l a -4- V-14-95 I1: IUAa exult xuuxtt, nuuuturr, arnA m JULUJJU 8. Other Alternatives In addition to the institutional arrangements reviewed above, several other options are available.These aftematives depart from local creation of a new special district a, County Service Area There are 844 county service areas in the State of California and represent one of the most widely used forms of Institutional arrangements. County Service Areas are not independent special districts. They may be formed in order to provide"extended governmental services"to growing unincorporated areas and to provide for the levy of taxes to pay for such extended services. County Service Areas are governed by the County Board of Supervisors, but may include areas within city boundaries, subject to approval of city government. b. County Control Counties are Specifically authorized to operate and maintain sewage treatment and disposal facilities. The County Board of Supervisors would assume power and authority for the operation and maintenance of the treatment systems. Under this form of institutional arrangement, the County would have no obligation to limit the use of the system to the area currently serviced. C. Districts Created by$oecial Acts Many sewer districts, and similar organizations are created by special acts of the legislature and are often referred to as Special Act Districts. Formation of a Special Act District allows the members of the district to create an entity with broad powers and services. The agerWs governing administrative and operations agreement can be tailored to the agency's special and unique needs. The level of flexibility provided by the Special Act is the primary attraction to this form of institution. The San Diego County Water Authority is an example of a Special Act District within the Southern California region. Formation of a Special Act District includes a legislative approval process which represents an added level of complexity. Formation of a Special Act District first requires unanimous approval by all member agencies. The members must then enter into a negotiations process to draft the special powers, operational responsibilities, and financial powers for the new entity. Once member agreement has been reached the legislative approval Special District is first sponsored by a local state assembly representative(s), and finally approved by the State Legislature. Formation can require voter approval if the legislature believes broad consensus is needed. 2eca a°°iOM -5- 01-14-911 11: 10AN NNUN xuuxix, wuuuxurr, arxx ro 3DIUM I UU 11 Uu i Conclusion and Recommendation As the Board can see,there are many other institutional alternatives available under California law for the public ownership and operation of wastewater control facilities. While each of these alternatives may have a specific benefit which is distinct from the other alternatives, it is our recommendation that the consolidation of the nine current county sanitation districts Into one county sanitation district Is the recommended action because the county sanitation district organizational entity provides the most comprehensive and flexible form of agency in the operations of wastewater control facilities. Furthermore, the County Sanitation District already has a proven track record of a high level of performance and service to Orange County. In the consolidation process, each district will have to vote in order to consolidate the nine districts into one county sanitation district. In the event that there is not a unanimous agreement by all nine districts, the organizational entity will be two or more county sanitation districts within the County of Orange. The initial step for consolidation is the preparation of a resolution by each of the districts petitioning LAFCO for the consolidation of the nine sanitation districts. We will be more than happy to provide the necessary documentation for each of the districts for the requisite petition to LAFCO to initiate the consolidation process. x�ooaoe �.mt_r -6- 7114/9( � " CONSOLIA ION ISSUES SFR Use Fee Equalization Schedule Dist User Fee Schedule From 1995-96 Budget Approx Annual User Fees Charged Per Budget Schedule j�Q 95-98 98-97 87l8 98-99 99j--QQ EDUs 9,5-902 aM_ IlMa 96-99 99-00 5 Yr Total Fee 1 83.24 100.00 120.00 140.00 160.00 74,000 6,159.760 7.400,000 8,880,000 10,360,000 11.840,000 44,639,760 2 75.00 100.00 100.00 125.00 125.00 275,000 20,625,000 27,500.000 27,500,000 34,375,000 34,375,000 144,375,000 3 73.89 75.00 76.00 78.00 80.00 285.000 21,058,650 21,375,000 21,660,000 22,230,000 22.800,000 109,123,650 5 96.75 100.00 105.00 110.00 115.00 28,000 2,709,000 2,800,000 2,940,000 3,080,000 3,220,000 14,749,000 6 76.47 80.00 85.00 90.00 95.00 44,000 3,364,680 3,520,000 3.740,000 3.960,000 4,180,000 18,764,680 7 50.09 52.00 54.00 56.00 60.00 106,000 5,309,540 5,512,000 5,724,000 5,936,000 6,360,000 28,841,540 11 60.00 72.00 84.00 96.00 106.00 52,000 3,120,000 3,744,000 4,368,000 4.992,000 5,512,000 21,736,000 13 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 8,000 800,000 800,000 800,000 800,000 800,000 4,000,000 872,000 63,146,630 72,651,000 75,612,000 85,733,000 89,087,000 386,229,630 _-User_Fee-Schedule to Equalize Fee in 5_Years__ Annual User Fees Charged to Equalize SFR Fee in 5 Years 1 83.24 90.00 97.00 105.00 105,00 74,000 6,159,760 6,660,000 7,178,000 7,770,000 7,770,000 35,537,760 2 75.00 94.00 100.00 105.00 105.00 275,000 20,625,000 25,850,000 27,500,000 28,875,000 28,875,000 131,725,000 3 73.89 80.00 90.00 100.00 105.00 285,000 21.058,650 22,800,000 25,650,000 28,500,000 29,925,000 127,933,650 5 96.75 100.00 100.00 105.00 105.00 28.000 2,709,000 2,800,000 2,800,000 2,940,000 2,940,000 14,189,000 6 76.47 82.00 89.00 97.00 105.00 44,000 3,364,680 3,608,000 3,916,000 4,268,000 4,620,000 19,776,680 7 50.09 60.00 70.00 80.00 105.00 106,000 5,309,540 6,360,000 7,420.000 8,480,000 11,130,000 38,699,540 11 60.00 75.00 85.00 95.00 105.00 52,000 3,120,000 3,900,000 4,420,000 4,940,000 5.460,000 21,840,000 13 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 105.00 8,000 800,000 800,000 800,000 800,000 940,000 4,040,000 8727600 63,146,630 72,778,000 79,684.000 86,573,000 91,560,000 393,741,630 Increase or(Decrease) in Annual Fee Increase or(Decrease)in Annual Total Charges 1 - (10.00) (23.00) (35.00) (55.00) - (740,000) (1,702,000) (2,590,000) (4,070,000) (9,102,000) 2 - (6.00) - (20.00) (20.00) - (1,650,000) - (5,500,000) (5,500,000) (12,650,000) 3 - 5.00 14.00 22.00 26.00 - 1,425,000 3,990,000 6,270,000 7,125,000 18,810,000 5 - - (5.00) (5.00) (10.00) - - (140,000) (140,000) (280,000) (560,000) 6 - 2.00 4.00 7.00 10.00 - 88,000 176.000 308,000 440,000 1,012,000 7 - 8.00 16.00 24.00 45.00 - 848.000 1,696,000 2,544,000 4,770,000 9,858,000 11 - 3.00 1.00 (1.00) (1.00) - 156,000 52,000 (52,000) (52,000) 104,000 13 - - - - 5.00 40,000 40,000 127,000 4,072,000 940,000 2,473,000 7,512,000 CONSOL9.XLS 12:07 PM Y JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS AGENDA FOR J U LY 26, 1995 Item (12)(b)(9): EXEC95-03: Consideration of motion approving hiring Assistant General Manager--Administration at top of classification range. Summary After an extensive search and interview process, we have determined that Judith Wilson is the best qualified candidate for the position of Assistant General Manager— Administration. Her qualifications and credentials are excellent, and her experience as a generalist is exactly what we need. Ms. Wilson is currently working with the Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority as the Executive Officer, Planning and Programming. Ms. Wilson reports directly to the Executive Director. She has served in that capacity for the past five years and has distinguished herself in part as being the only executive �.✓ to have remained in place during that period. (Miss Wilson's resume is attached.) This matter is being brought forward through the Committee system because Resolution No. 95-54 (Classification, Compensation and other terms and conditions) requires Joint Board approval to hire anyone in any classification "beyond the midpoint of a range." Since Ms. Wilson's current salary of$128,000 is above the $120,000 top of range for the Assistant General Manager position, she is requesting and the General Manager is recommending appointment at top step. Staff Recommendation Based on the qualifications and experience Ms. Wilson brings with her to the Districts, appointment at the top step is appropriate and is recommended. This matter was discussed at the FAHR Committee at its regular meeting of July 12, 1995 and passed to the Executive Committee. Executive Committee Recommendation The Executive Committee recommends approving hiring Assistant General Manager— Administration at top of classification range. Ja�-nee JUDITH A. WILSON br/ 632 South Grand Avenue Pasadena, CA 91105 (H) 818-441-1779 (0) 213-244-6576 EXPERIENCE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority 818 West Seventh Street Los Angeles, California 90017 April 1993 - Present In the newly reorganized LACMTA, as Executive Officer for Planning and Programming, I am responsible for all bus, rail, and highway planning and programming for Los Angeles County. Under my supervision are the Multimodal Area Teams which do project management, joint development, research, and economic development; Countywide Planning, which includes: transit systems integration; Transportation Demand Management; Modeling; and compliance with ADA and Congestion Management requirements; Capital Planning, which includes long-term financial planning; grants management; benefit assessment; and financial programming. This division is one of four line departments reporting to the CEO and includes staff from the now merged LACTC and the SCRTD. DEPUTY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Los Angeles County Transportation Commission/LACMTA 818 West Seventh Street Los Angeles, CA 90017 April 1990 - April 1993 I managed the overall rail, bus, and highway planning and programming for Los Angeles County. Working with six multimodal, geographically based Area Teams, I oversaw the rail planning program from the preliminary planning stage through environmental clearance and preliminary engineering. My organization provided technical support to 17 bus transit operators and 89 local jurisdictions in securing formula and discretionary funding. The Area Teams were also responsible for preparing, in consultation with Caltrans, the Authority' s proposals for the State Transportation Improvement Program and the implementation of the HOV Master Plan. • N UDITH A. WILSON RESUME PAGE TWO I also supervised the Congestion Management Program, the Americans with Disabilities Act Compliance Program, and the overall transportation systems planning, including Transportation Demand Management and support to the Los Angeles cities with commuter rail stations . Also under my supervision was the Safety Authority for Freeway Emergencies (SAFE) program, which upgraded all freeway call boxes to cellular solar power equipment, and the newly established Freeway Service Patrol. ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER 1986 - 1990 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES AGENCY 1985 - 1986 DIRECTOR ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER 1982 - 1985 EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT TO THE 1980 - 1982 CITY MANAGER City of Pasadena 100 North Garfield Avenue Pasadena, CA 91101 September 1980 March 1990 Working through a series of progressively responsible positions, as Assistant City Manager I managed all of the administrative services for the city such as purchasing, fleet maintenance, data processing, print shop, and public facilities as well as managing the Housing and Community Development Department, including all discretionary land use, building inspection, planning, and zoning. In addition to these responsibilities, I supervised the city's lobbyists in Sacramento and Washington D. C. and managed the city' s public information programs, including KPAS, the city' s cable television channel. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATOR/ SENIOR POLICY ANALYST Government of the Virgin Islands Virgin Islands Department of Commerce St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. April 1976 - August 1980 `�N i JDDITH A. WILSON RESUME PAGE THREE In this position, I was responsible for preparing the territory' s Overall Economic Development Plan (OEDP) and supervising the implementation of various economic development projects on St. Thomas, St. John, and St. Croix. I provided the staff support to the Governor' s Economic Policy Council and prepared a_ variety of initiatives to secure Federal funds for such project as two new hospitals, an expanded airport, and three desalination plants. I also prepared analysis on tariff issues, dealing with specialized customs duties, and presented briefs before the Federal Maritime Commission to ensure that shipping tariffs maintained the Virgin Islands competitive position. INTERGOVERNMENTAL FISCAL RELATIONS OFFICER Northern Virginia Transportation Commission Arlington, Virginia February 1974 - April 1976 In this position, I was responsible for coordinating the financial support for the Virginia share of the Metrobus Capital and Operating Program, as well as the Metro Rail Capital Project, which was under construction at that time. I represented the cities of Falls Church, Fairfax City, Alexandria, the counties of Arlington and Fairfax, and the Commonwealth of Virginia. This position entailed negotiations among the other funding partners (Maryland, the District of Columbia, and the Federal government) , as well as negotiations between and among the Virginia jurisdictions in the allocation of capital costs and operating subsidies. I also lobbied extensively with the state legislature for additional revenue sources. ASSISTANT FINANCE DIRECTOR/BUDGET OFFICER City of Falls Church Falls Church, Virginia October 1972 - February 1974 In this position, I prepared the annual budget for the city, monitored all departmental expenditures, and negotiated wage settlements with bargaining units. I also provided direct staff support to the City Manager and City Council and represented the City on the Police and Fire Disability Retirement Board. P JDDITH A. WILSON RESUME PAGE FOUR MANAGEMENT ANALYST Port Authority of New York and New Jersey World Trade Center New York, New York June 1970 - March 1971 This was a rotational assignment. I performed internal management audits of various operating departments in the Port Authority. The Port Authority includes the operation of the New York and Northern New Jersey metropolitan area' s airports, bridges, tunnels, container ports, and the Port Authority Trans Hudson Rail System (PATH) . EDUCATION Skidmore College Saratoga Springs, N.Y. 1969 B. A. Special Honors: Editor-In-Chief, Skidmore News, 1968 - 1969 Columbia University Book Prize, 1968 General Electric College Bowl Team, 1968 Maxwell School of Public Affairs Syracuse University 1970 M.P.A. Syracuse, New York Special Honors : Andrew Mellon Fellow Kennedy School of Government 1986 State and Harvard University Local Cambridge, Massachusetts - Government Program Special Honors: Certificate Elected to 4-Year Term Kennedy School Board 1988 - 1992 r JUDITH A. WILSON �../ RESUME PAGE FIVE AWARDS Henry Scoville Award, American Society for Public Administration 1984 (given annually to an : outstanding young government professional in the Los Angeles Metropolitan Area) . - Gold Rey Award, Pasadena Arts Council, 1990 - In recognition of efforts to initiate the Pasadena Arts Commission and an Art In Public Places program. PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS American Society for Public Administration - Board Member Central City Association - Board Member Commuter Transportation Services - Board Member American Public Transit Association International City Management Association Women's Transportation Seminar Vn/ JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS .. AGENDA FOR JULY 26, 1995 Item (12)(b)(1 Q): EXEC95-04: Consideration of motion to receive and file the Finance Function Review—Final Report prepared by Ernst &Young Summary The management consulting firm of Ernst & Young was asked to conduct a Finance Department assessment at the January 1995 Joint Board meeting. That assessment or review has been completed and a final report has been prepared. A presentation on the report was presented at the July 19, 1995 Executive Committee meeting. When the report was being prepared, the Finance Department included the functional areas of: Finance, Accounting, Purchasing and Warehousing, and Information Services. The report assesses the role and effectiveness of the Finance Department functions, compares against industry"leading practices," identifies areas for improvement and proposes action plans and �a.✓ timelines. Copies of the report were given to the Executive Committee members. If any director wishes a copy, please contact Gary Streed. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Executive Committee receive and file the Finance Function Review- Final Report, prepared by Ernst & Young. Executive Committee Recommendation The Executive Committee recommends that the Joint Boards of Directors receive and file the Finance Function Review-Final Report, prepared by Ernst & Young. J 1WPWlT&SAGB5NA1]BIO r r MASTER PLAN FOR THE LEMON HEIGHTS SEWER SYSTEM Contract Number 7-16 7 County Sanitation District 0 Number 7 of Orange County Fjowle FFpFESS/qy r rip FQ.ENv v Z No C177i4 m P.O.Box 3030 qlf OF C£LCe��,\ December 1991 OC-007-153-00 County Sanitation District Number 7 of Orange County LEMON HEIGHTS SEWER PLAN December 1991 I GENERAL Lemon Heights, an unincorporated area, is located in the Tustin Hills north of the main City of Tustin and to the east of the new Tustin Ranch development which recently annexed to the City of Tustin. The terrain Is hilly with irregular road patterns. Road profiles are also irregular and public roads don't necessarily follow contour patterns. Private roads provide access to a number of the homes in the area and they are also irregular and may not follow contour - patterns. Many are narrow and In marginal condition, and a few are located outside the boundaries of the recorded easements. There is a ridge line which essentially cuts through the center of the study area, the easterly section draining east to Peters Canyon (Tustin Ranch) and the westerly section draining south, — west, and northwesterly. Currently 154 lots have houses and 22 lots are undeveloped. 11 TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING .� The study area has been topographically mapped with 2-foot contour intervals and existing homes, and structures such as swimming pools and tennis court locations plotted on the .d maps. The maps are stored in five digitized floppy disks in micro station format. -1- Property lines, public and private road easements taken from recorded tract maps have been digitized in micro station format and superimposed on the topographic base map(s). The base maps (five floppy disks) can be printed out to any scale. The aerial photograph was flown for a V = 40' base map reproduction which is the scale recommended for construction drawings. v III PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING A. Drainage There is a ridge line that bisects the Lemon Heights study area. The easterly area drains to Peters Canyon while the westerly area drains South, west and northwest. In each major drainage area there are many subareas due to secondary ridge lines with accompanying gullies. This situation is somewhat advantageous in that it permits development of independent small trunk systems, which might be more conducive for various property owner groups to initiate construction of sewage facilities. B. Sewage System Preliminary Design The study area was subdivided into 20 drainage basin areas with 23 sub basin �^ areas. Consequently, there are 20 independent trunk systems. Each trunk system can at present or in the future connect to offsite trunks which lie around the periphery of Lemon Heights. There are 23 subtrunks to the main systems, each lot has been assigned to a trunk or subtrunk. The trunks and subtrunks are coded alphabetically in a clockwise manner. Lot assignments are also coded alphabetically to the particular letter code of the trunk or subtrunk to which the house lateral will connect to for sewer service. Drain basin areas 'A; -B; -C; -D' -2- and 'S' drain east to the Tustin Ranch Development. The rest drain southwest and northwest to existing CSD No.7 sewers. There are a few ahemative trunk layouts which could be utilized depending on development of adjacent properties in Tustin Ranch. For instance, it the Harvard Trunk in Peters Canyon Road next to Lemon Heights was placed Into operation, and the Covey Lane Pump Station deactivated by a gravity line to the Harvard Trunk via the proposed 'L' Street sewer, lots SA4,5, 6, 7 and BAB, BAB1, BAB2, BCS, BCA1 and BA2 could be served by the Lemon Heights Drive-Covey Lane system rather than perhaps having to wait for development of the 'B' Trunk _ System. There are other possibilities which depend on future tract layouts in Tustin Ranch. These situations are apparent upon examination of the r topographic-trunk system map. Also there are some individual parcels that could be re-assigned depending how adjacent sewer projects might develop and the elevation relationship of the existing house lateral to these potential projects. The sewer plan was developed to provide an all gravity system for the entire study area. In view of the irregular topography, some sewers are located along side property lines, where vehicular access may not be feasible for maintenance operations in the future. Therefore, it should be noted that maintenance of those areas may require small portable equipment that can be carried to the she. However, since most of the sewers in these areas will have a steep slope with corresponding high flow velocities, periods between required maintenance are expected to be significantly greater than normal. e. -3- C. Easements Full implementation of the sewer plan will require 82 separate permanent easements over private property be acquired. Thirty of these easements lie in r private roads serving more than one property and are noted as Class 'A' easements on the Data Sheet. It is assumed Class 'A' easements will be dedicated free of charge to the District as the various sewer projects develop. In CSD No. 7 past projects similar to the Lemon Heights situation has been the case. The other 52 permanent easements for the most part are located along side or rear property lines of individual lots. They are required because of topographic relationship to the various drainage areas. These easements are noted as Class r 'B' on the Data Sheet. Likewise on past CSD No. 7 projects, many have been dedicated free of charge. s. It should be noted some temporary construction easements may be required, although they cannot be identified at this time. There is normally no or minimal cost associated with such temporary easements. IV DATA SHEETS r Lot assignments to specific trunks and subtrunks as noted on the topographic map are presented in tabular form on the Data Sheet. The Orange County Assessor's parcel number for each lot is also given. Sewer lengths posted apply to the length of line In the public or private .. road adjacent to the lot, or in a Class easement on the lot. All lengths are approximate and will be refined in final design. 4- V. PROJECT AND CLASS "B" EASEMENT COSTS Project and Class 'B' easement costs are estimated for each drainage basin area and included on the data sheet. Project costs Include construction costs plus an allowance of 22 percent for engineering, inspection, construction surveying and contract administration. Class 'B' easement costs are based on a 20400t wide permanent easement in accordance with the .. Districts staff recommendation at a cost of$1.20 per square foot. Other costs associated with r implementation of the sewer system, such as annexation and connection fees, assessment district costs and homeowner costs are not included in the project costs. y For those drainage basins which have subdrainage basins, costs are further broken down for each sub-area. In some of the large drainage basins such as Area "B" there are considerable possibilities for construction projects independent of the entire basin. Project size can influence the construction cost, since usually the larger the project the lower the unit costs. The costs posted on the data sheets where there are sub-areas are average costs for the entire drainage area if it were to be constructed as one project, and not indicative for any particular project that might be split off from the whole area. Other anomalies for situations where a sub-area might be the initial project occur in regard to financing the construction of an 'outfall trunk' serving the entire drainage area. As an example, s, take the case of the sub-area'BB'. Assume it is the first project in B drainage area and lots BB1 through BB6 wish to form an assessment district or proceed with a cash up front project. Outfall trunk 'B' from "M' Street would have to be constructed up to the junction of 'BB' subtrunk. The cost of the outfall trunk would be split equally between lots BB1 through BB6 and r the remaining costs for the 'BB'trunk would also be split equally since the benefit received'for .. each lot is identical, namely sewer service for a residential lot. However, In the future, as upstream lots build sewers which discharge into outfall trunk 'B; reimbursement to the initial BB1-BB6 lot owners should be made on a prorata basis taking into account the number of lots 3- served by the outfall portion of trunk "B.' As properties are sewered upstream of subtrunk 'BB' .. they pay for their own construction costs equally (same benefit received) and the initial property owners on 'BB'are not reimbursed for their'BB"subtrunk costs to sewer their lots. -6- LEMON NEIGTNS SEWER PLAN May 20, 1992 Drainage Total Sever Total Seger Class "A" Class "B" Project (1) Class ^8^ Drainage Basin Assessors Lot Drainage Trunk Sever Required Per Required Per Easement Easement Cost Easement Cost Basin Area Sub-Ares Parcel No. No. Length Sub-Area Area Length Length S S .......... ........ .......... ............ ........... ............ ............ ......... ......... ............ ............. "A^ 503-491-28 Al 400 145 503-491-29 A2 195 165 110 503-491-31 A3 245 503-491-37 A4 170 503-491-25 AS 503-491-34 A6 195 503-491-24 A7 15 1,205 "AN. 503-491-27 AA1 195 503-491.36 AA2 160 60 503.491-38 AAS 140 345 1,550 121,024 4,080 560 ^B" 5D2-391-07 91 730 320 502-391-01 02 195 1" 502-381-08 93 120 130 log 502-381-06 84 135 230 160 502-381-20 B5 502-341-06 B6 230 502-341-05 B7 235 502-362-14 88 420 I55 502-362-13 B9 140 320 502-362.12 610 175 380 502-362-11 Bit 180 160 502-372-09 812 150 100 502-372-17 013 IN 502-372-DB 814 135 100 502-372-07 815 130 3,155 230,946 61,080 470 "BA^ 502-401-03 RAI 450 502.341-24 BA2 290 100 502-341-23 SO 502-341-21 BA4 100 502-341-22 BA5 125 145 502-341-15 BA6 100 502-341-14 8A7 200 502-341.13 BAB 150 502-353-08 BA9 160 1.575 122,976 2,400 ^BAA" 502-391-04 BM1 220 260 502-391-02 RARE 220 130 502-341-19 BAA3 185 502-341-18 BW 625 45,750 9,360 "B4B" 502-341-21 B6B1 10D 592-341-27 B492 100 14,054 "BB" 502-381-16 691 130 502-381-09 BB2 70 502-381-10 893 185 160 502-351-02 684 80 502-381.11 895 250 260 502-361-02 896 100 503-491-18 B87 330 503-491-12 BBB 503-491-17 BB9 140 503-491-13 8810 80 503-491-16 BB11 503-491-14 B812 130 503-491-15 BB12 1,395 102,114 12,480 "B04" 502-381-21 B841 185 185 13,542 "BBB" 503-491-69 6891 250 503-491-63 B992 503-491-68 8683 503-491-64 8084 503-491-67 B885 503-491-65 SBB6 503-491-66 0087 250 19,520 "BBC" 503-491-20 BBC1 10D 95 503-491-21 BBC2 10D 135 503-491-22 BBC3 130 190 503-491-23 BBC4 210 540 42,163 4,560 "BC^ 502-381-21 BC1 95 502341-07 BC2 80 502-341-09 BC3 130 310 502-341.26 BC4 502-341-11 BCS 130 502-341-03 BC6 230 120 502-353-03 BC7 50 440 502-341-02 BCB 70 125 502-341-01 BC9 130 130 502-353-02 BOB 25 502-362-07 BC11 110 1,050 81,984 27,000 •BG^ 502-341-12 BG1 175 502-353-04 BG2 502-353-05 BG3 100 502.353-M BG4 135 502-353-01 BUS 165 575 44,8% "8G" 502-362-16 BD1 40 150 230 502.341-04 BD2 110 502-362-15 BD3 290 80 502-362-09 9D4 290 502-362-08 BD5 90 530 41,382 ?'"0 "BE^ 502-373-16 BE1 160 140 502-372-15 BE2 502-372-11 BE3 40 502-372-10 BE4 60 260 19,032 °B7" 502-362-10 BE1 150 160 502-362-05 Bf2 165 502-362-86 Bi3 200 502-362-04 B94 330 845 61,654 3,x0 502-362-02 BG1 125 502-372-10 BG2 125 9,150 11,290 849,364 128,160 480 502-401-03 C1 300 265 502-401-06 C1 502-401-05 C2 265 245 502-401-01 C3 245 502-401-01 C4 150 'CA- 502-334-0 G1 100 810 150 502333-02 502-333-05 6 C63 502-333-0 G4 502-333-013 C6 CAS 502-354-0 CB6 502-354-02 C67 502-354-0B 502.354-04 3 G9 502-342-0 G10 502-342-012 3 G G1u 10 soz-xz-o1 G 100 no 1,120 83,497 30,960 200 "D" 502-334-02 D1 220 390 502-334-21 D2 200 420 "06" 502-334-05 D61 125 502-334-04 D62 502-334.23 083 90 215 635 46,482 14,160 t t t e [ [ [ t [ e e e t e t [ [ [ •F• 502.331-01 F1 260 130 190 ,50 502-332-04 F3 113 2" $02-332-02 FS 290 502-332-02 F4 1280 25 502-332-02 FS 125 •F6• 502-351.05 F61 210 1,070 210 •F6• 502-332-03 FBI 120 502.332-01 F12 200 502-352-06 F83 140 502.352.05 FB3 460 1,740 134,834 7,920 •G• 502-352-03 01 502.351.03 02 100 ?,us •N• 502-361-06 N1 110 502-361-05 N2 S02.361-04 N3 140 S02-361-03 N4 00 SGZ-371-01 NS 100 502-361-02 NS 502-361.01 N5 430 33,574 •J• 502.441-04 J1 502.441.03 J2 230 502.441-02 J3 240 270 502.441.01 R 300 250 502.441-07 .15 S02-431-03 J6 240 00 502-431-05 J7 00 060 67,149 •K• 502.432-11 K1 165 1" 502.432-10 K2 165 330 24,156 4,960 •L• 502.432-07 L1 225 200 502-432.06 LZ 120 120 sox-432-12 a 340 310 S02-432-05 L4 195 e e e e a a e a a a e a e e e e e e e 502-432-04 L5 215 900 70,272 9,460 502-432-03 M1 260 502-432-02 M2 240 120 502-432-01 M3 135 635 49,581 2,880 40 502-095-02 N1 240 502-095-02 N2 240 18,739 960 502-411-11 P1 600 502-093-03 P2 520 502-372-01 P3 390 502-362-01 P4 490 502-372-03 PS 115 502-372-02 P6 90 220 502-372-19 P7 225 2,430 "PA• 502-411-04 PA1 195 502-411-02 PAZ 350 150 502-422-01 PA3 650 150 502-422-02 PA4 175 100 502-422-11 PAS 502-422-09 PA6 165 220 502-422-10 PAT 1,535 220 140 "PM" 502-411-06 PM1 340 502-411-01 PAA2 340 •PAV 502-422-12 PA81 165 165 'PAC' 502-422-03 PAC1 160 160 2,200 347,846 18,240 •0• 502-412-09 01 170 100 502-412-06 02 180 502-412-05 03 100 450 "0.A• 502-412-10 "1 /50 150 600 46,116 2,400 l t [ [ t t t I t I t I 1 I I I 1 t t 200 502-421-03 111 240 160 502-421-01 R2 170 410 30,012 8'"0 "So 502.372.14 81 110 150 502-373-13 52 160 270 21,082 TOTAL SERER REQUIRED FOR DISTRICT 23,310 4,290a" 9,685 " 1,951,536 232,440 ....................................... t1) Project Cost imiudes Qarotruction cast plus and a1loRanee of 22% for engineering, Irmeetlon and contract edoinistratlan. 4.. s r r r MASTER PLAN FOR THE ORANGE PARK ACRES r SEWER SYSTEM Contract No. 7-18 r County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County r oQpOFESS/p,7q .Wpm JQEUGEMEsr Efy .23 y a y w No.C17714 � m En.:6 7 A r rl CIVIL Enc7tneerincj �EOF CA0OP Corporation r Newport Beach,CA 92658-90W r JUNE 1994 r OC-007-155-01 r .. County Sanitation District Number 7 of Orange County ORANGE PARK ACRES SEWER PLAN JUNE1994 I GENERAL Orange Park Acres is an unincorporated area in the County of Orange surrounded completely by the City of Orange and made up of approximately 434 acres. Orange Park Acres' main arterial is Orange Park Blvd which splits the study area and is located between Santiago Canyon Road and Chapman Avenue. The terrain is hilly with steep areas to the west of Orange Park Blvd and is primarily made up of large parcels. Access to a number of the homes is provided by private access roads that follow contour patterns and usually have descending elevations to public streets. These private access roads are not all paved and vary between 10 and 30 feet in width. The study area's low point is Handy Creek which cuts through the northern section and flows toward the northwest, into the Orange County Flood Control District facilities IOCFCDI. Handy Creek also runs through the rear of various properties and has very limited access. The sewer study has identified 394 parcel lots that will require construction of V' various sewers to outfalls in order to be serviced. Of the 394 parcel lots, 22 are undeveloped. II TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING Topographic mapping of the study area was flown on August 11, 1992 and prepared by Rattray & Associates Inc. The study area was mapped with 2-foot contour intervals showing curbs and gutters, street striping, existing homes, trees, swimming pools, tennis courts and various other structures. The maps are stored on twenty-four digital floppy disks in the micro-station format. Property lines, public and private access road easements, right-of-way, and centerline information was obtained from record of surveys, recorded tract and ORANGE PARK ACRES SEWER PLAN -1- JUNE 1994 wr r bl parcel maps and have been mapped in micro-station format and superimposed on the topographic base maps. Existing county, city, and private sewers have also been mapped from construction drawings with manhole ground and invert elevations shown. With the use of micro-station, the base maps can be printed out to any scale. The aerial photographs were flown for 1 " = 40' base map reproduction which is the scale recommended for construction drawings. d III PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING aos A. Drainage The general drainage pattern for the southern portion of the study area is east toward the City of Orange local sewers which eventually drain into the Orange Park .. Acres Trunk. In the northern portion of the study area the drainage pattern is northeast toward Handy Creek. Handy Creek flows toward the northwest and runs r through the rear of various properties which have limited access. Drainage from this northern portion of the study area eventually drain into the Santiago Canyon Road Trunk and west into District No 7. r B. Sewage System Preliminary Design r The study area was subdivided into 17 sewer service areas with 30 sub-service areas and 17 proposed trunks systems. Each proposed trunk system connects to a nearby existing trunk outfall owned either by the City of Orange, the County Sanitation District, or a privately owned sewer. Also note that some of these r existing sewers lie within the Orange Park Acres study area. There are 46 trunks and subtrunks to the main systems which have parcels assigned to them. The trunks and subtrunks are coded alphabetically in a r clockwise manner. Parcel lot assignments are also coded alphabetically to the particular letter code of the trunk or subtrunk to which the house lateral will ultimately connect to for sewer service. Parcel lots that are within the study area and have direct access to an existing sewer, owned by the City of Orange, the Sanitation District, or privately owned, have been eliminated from the study and thus from any proposed assessment r ORANGE PARK ACRES SEWER PLAN -2- JUNE 1994 b �P r district. The Sanitation District's policy permits direct connections to trunks or subtrunks up to and including 24 inches in diameter and likewise the City of Orange will permit connections to their sewers subject to meeting their requirements. Twenty lots within the study area already have sewer lateral connections to existing trunks and are shown on the sewer plan plate in the rear of this report. Also, note that the City of Orange has records of several of the sewer laterals that e are off of the "AA" trunk system but no information that indicates the locations of these laterals is available. m Sewer service areas "J", "K", "M", "MA", "N", "0", "P", "O", "R", "S", and "T" which are located in the southern portion of the study area drain northeast into City owned sewers that eventually drain into the Sanitation District's Orange Park Acres Trunk. Sewer service areas "A", "B", and "C" are located in the northern portion r of the study area and drain directly into the Sanitation District's Santiago Canyon Road Trunk. Sewer service area "V" is located in the northwest portion of the study area and drains northwest to a City of Orange sewer located along Portsmouth Circle. The remaining service areas drain to the City of Orange trunk located along Clark Lane between Orange Park Blvd and Randall Street, along !' Randall Street between Clark Lane and Meads Avenue, and along Meads Avenue between Randall Street and approximately 250 feet south of Acre Place. The City of Orange trunk previously described is the connecting middle section of c, two County Sanitation Trunks (the Santiago Canyon Road Trunk and the Orange Park Acre Trunk). Preliminary construction costs for the replacement of this trunk (Clark, Randall, & Meads Replacement) have been developed and compared to an alternative. The alternative was to construct a trunk along Handy Creek which would begin at the intersection of Clark Lane and Orange Park Blvd, head south '0 along Orange Park Blvd to Handy Creek, southeast along Handy Creek through the rear of lots U5, W26, WA1 , IA5, IA3, 12, and W32, and north approximately 250' •.+ along Meads Avenue. From these two alternatives, the Clark, Randall, & Meads alternative was selected by the District. This alternative was selected for the e, following reasons: a) The difficulty of right-of-way acquisitions and the cost of ti legal fees for approximately 1,850 feet over seven separate parcels make this alternative undesirable. w ORANGE PARK ACHES SEWER PLAN .3- JUNE 1994 ae ti b) The construction difficulties that will arise, such as limited access and equipmen movability, and lack of space make this alternative impractical. c) The natural formation of Handy Creek has been altered with retaining walls serving as banks with grade build-up on the sides at certain sections. The high ,e cost of restoring the creek to its current condition make this alternative undesirable. m This sewer plan was developed to operate as an "all gravity system" for the entire study area, so some sewers had to be located along the side property lines, such as the "Ll" and the "N" Trunks. At these locations where vehicular access may not be feasible for maintenance operations, curved sewers were laid out to eliminate manholes. Therefore, it should be noted that maintenance of those areas may require small portable equipment that can be carried to the site. But since most of the sewers in these areas will have a steep slope with corresponding high flow velocities, the required maintenance should be less frequent than normally experienced. At the request of the District, the "IG" trunk, which is located in the northeastern portion of the study area, has been extended approximately 260 feet up to the City of Orange boundary. By extending the trunk, parcel lots that are located at the ,. north end of the access easement and within the City of Orange can be serviced. When the City decides to provide service to these parcel lots, the owners of the lots will have to pay their direct benefit costs, as in any Assessment District. C. Easements Full implementation of the sewer plan will require acquisition of 41 separate �+ permanent easements over private property and private access roads. Twenty-five of these easements lie in private roads serving more than one property or in Orange s, County Flood Control property and are noted as Class "A" easements on the data spreadsheet. It is assumed that Class "A" easements will be dedicated free of charge to the District as the various sewer projects develop. This has been the case for similar projects located in District No. 7, such as the Lemon Heights and Cowan Heights projects. ORANGE PARK ACRES SEWER PLAN -4- JUNE 1994 e.r r d The other 16 permanent easements are located along the side or rear property lines of individual lots. They are required because of the topographic relationship to the various drainage areas. These easements are noted as Class "B" on the data spreadsheet. Also, note that the cost for all Class "B" easements has been included in the speadsheet even though these types of easements have been .,, dedicated free of charge for similar projects in District No. 7. r It should be noted that some temporary construction easements may be required, although they cannot be identified at this time. Usually, there is no or minimal cost associated with such temporary easements. d IV DATA SHEETS Lot assignments to specific trunks and subtrunks as noted on the topographic s, sewer study map are presented in tabular form on the data spreadsheet. The Orange County Assessor's parcel number for each lot is also given with each lot identification number. Trunk sewer lengths posted apply to the length of line in the public and private roads, and to proposed sewers that are adjacent or cut across private property. Class "A" easements lengths apply to sewer lengths that are in s private access easements or OCFCD property and Class "B" easements apply to lengths that are in private property. All lengths are approximate and will be refined ,.. in the final design. V PROJECT COST & CLASS "B" EASEMENTS COST Project cost and Class "B" easement cost are estimated for each sewer service area and are included on the data spreadsheet. The project costs are based on a $78 per lineal foot of sewer, that includes construction costs plus an allowance of 22 d percent for engineering, inspection, construction surveying, and contract administration. Class "B" easements are based on a 20-foot wide permanent r easement at a cost of a $1 .20 per square foot. This criteria is in accordance with the District staff's recommendation. Other costs associated with implementation of the sewer system, such as annexation and connection fees, assessment district ee costs, and homeowner costs are not included in the project costs. The total project and Class "B" easement costs are $3.0 million and $120 thousand respectively. r ORANGE PARK ACRES SEWER PLAN 5 JUNE 1994 ty d For those sewer service areas which have sub-service areas, the costs are further broken down for each sub-service area (see data spreadsheet at the end of this report). In some of the large service areas, such as Area "I" there are considerable e' possibilities for construction projects independent of the entire service area. Project size can influence the Construction cost, since usually the larger the project the e, lower the unit costs. The costs identified on the data spreadsheets where there are sub-service areas are average costs for the entire service area and are not indicative .s for any particular project that might be split off from the whole area. Other situations where a sub-service areas might be the initial project occur in regard to financing the construction of an "outfall trunk" serving the entire service area. As an example, take the case of the sub-service area "UA". Assume it is the .+ first project in the "U" service area and lots UA1 and UA6 wish to form an assessment district or proceed with a cash up front project. Outfall trunk "U" along s Orange Park Blvd would have to be constructed up to the junction of the "UA" subtrunk. The cost of the outfall "U" trunk would be split equally between lots UA1 through UA6 and the remaining costs for the "ILIA" trunk would also be split equally since the benefit received for each lot is identical, namely sewer service for a residential lot. However, in the future, as upstream lots build sewers which s discharge into outfall trunk "U", reimbursement to the initial UA1 through UA6 lot owners should be made on prorated basis taking into account the number of lots ,., served by the outfall portion of the "U" trunk. As properties are sewered upstream of the "U" trunk, they pay for their own construction cost equally (same benefit received) and the initial property owners on "ILIA" are not reimbursed for their "ILIA" subtrunk costs to sewers their lots. w s d of a ORANGE PARK ACRES SEWER PLAN -6- JUNE 1994 sY 1 1 1 1 1 1, 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 9 1 MASTER PLAN FOR ORANGE PARK ACRES SEWER SYSTEM CONTRACT N0.7.18 CLASS'B"EASEMENT COST 24 (f/FI] COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7 OF ORANGE COUNTY PROJECT COST 78 (ST T) 2123M OC-007-155-01 SERVICE TRUNK TOTAL SEWER TOTALSEWER CLASS'A' CLASS'B' CLASS"B" SEWER SEWER AREA SEWER REQUIRED PER REQUIRED PER EASEMENT EASEMENT PROJECT(1) EASEMENT SERVICE SERVICE ASSESSOR LOT LENGTH SUB-AREA AREA LENGTH LENGTH COST COST AREA SUB-AREA PARCEL NO. NO. (FT.) (FT.) (F7.) (FT.) (FT.) f f "A" 379481-3 AI 379451.11 A2 379451.3 A3 220 220 3794514 A4 220 "B" 379481-8 B2 379491.6 B3 379491.10 94 379481.5 B5 470 425 470 'C. 379-571-13 CI 379-571-12 C2 379-571-11 C3 379-571-10 C4 379471.9 CS 379-571-8 C6 350 3".571-7 C7 379-571-6 CS 379-571-5 C9 (1)PROJECT COST INCLUDES CONSTRUCTION COST PLUS AN ALLOWANCE OF 22%FOR ENGINEERING,INSPECTION,AND CONTRACT ADMMISTRAMON. a a a a a a a a t a a t a a a a a a a -8- MASTER PLAN FOR ORANGE PARK ACRES SEWER SYSTEM CONTFLACTNO.7-18 CLASS"R"EASEMENT COST 24 ($/Ff) COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7 OF ORANGE COUNTY PROJECT COST 78 2413194 OCC07.155-01 SERVICE TRUNK TOTALSEWER TOTALSEWER CLASS"A" CLASS'B- CLASS"B" SEWER SEWER AREA SEWER REQUIRED PER REQUIREDPER EASEMENT EASEMENT PROJECT(1) EASEMENT SERVICE SERVICE ASSESSOR LOT LENGTH SUB-AREA AREA LENGTH LENGTH COST COST AREA SUB-AREA PARCELNO. NO. (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) 379.5714 CIO 379.571.3 C11 379.571-I C12 320 379-571.2 C13 670 379.571-14 DI 379-572.9 D2 379-571-15 D3 379-572.8 D1 379-571-16 D5 379-572-7 D6 379-571-17 D7 379-572.6 DB 379-571-19 IN 330 379-572-5 D10 379-57149 D11 379-5724 D12 379-571-20 D13 3T9-572-3 D14 379-57141 D15 379-572-21 D16 379-571.22 D17 379-572-22 D18 379-571-23 D19 (1)PROJECT COST INCLUDES CONSTRUCTION COST PLUS AN ALLOWANCE OF 22%FOR ENGINEERING,INSPECTION,AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION. A- MASTER PLAN FOR ORANGE PARK ACRES SEWER SYSTEM CONTRACT NO.7-I9 CLASS-B'EASEMENT COST 24 (vm COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7 OF ORANGE COUNTY PROJECT COST 78 (S/FT) 20194 0CC07-155.01 SERVICE TRUNK TOTALSEWER TOTALSEWER CLASS'A' CLASS'B' CLASS"B' SEWER SEWER AREA SEWER REQUIRED PER REQUIRED PER EASEMENT EASEMENT PROJECT(1) EASEMENT SERVICE SERVICE ASSESSOR LOT LENGTH SUB-AREA AREA LENGTH LENGTH COST COST AREA SUB-AREA PARCEL NO. NO. (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) S S 379-571-24 D20 320 'E' 379-582-16 El 379-582-15 E2 379-591-14 ES 370 379-581-12 E4 379-381-11 ES 360 379-391-10 E6 379-581-9 E7 3794814 ES 255 379-581-7 E9 379-5814 E10 379-581-5 Ell 379-S9I4 E12 379-581-3 E13 255 1,240 96,720 0 'EA' 379-581-13 EA1 379-582-13 RAI 37MI11-14 EAS 379-591-15 EA4 379-582-8 EA5 379-582-7 EA6 379-581-16 EA7 (1)PROJECT COST INCLUDES CONSTRUCTION COST PLUS AN ALLOWANCE OF 22%FOR ENGMEERING,INSPECTION,AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION. t I I t t I I t I I I 1 I 1 I I I I -10. MASTER PLAN FOR ORANGE PARK ACRES SEWER SYSTEM CONTRACT NO.7.18 CLASS"B"EASEMENT COST 24 (SfFT) COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7 OF ORANGE COUNTY PROJECT COST 78 (sTn MY94 OC-007.155-01 SERVICE TRUNK TOTALSEWER TOTAL SEWER CLASS'A" CLASS"B" CLASS'B" SEWER SEWER AREA SEWER REQUIRED PER REQUIRED PER EASEMENT EASEMENT PROJECT(]) EASEMENT SERVICE SERVICE ASSESSOR LOT LENGTH SUB-AREA AREA LENGTH LENGTH COST COST AREA SUB-AREA PARCEL NO. NO. (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) S S 379.591.17 EAS 350 379-582.6 EA9 379.582.5 EA10 379.591.19 EAII 379-581.19 EA12 379-592A EAU 379-582.3 EA14 379.581.20 EA15 379.581-21 EA16 275 379-582.2 EAU 379-592.1 EAIS 625 zz 48,750 0 ,,i a . «r, 5 Br �r— I—nd .1. 379-I31.1 11 300 379-551-13 12 379-131.5 13 330 379A31.6 14 379A31-7 15 379-531-12 17 379-061AI IS 350 379-061.1 110 450 379-061-29 111 379-061.3 112 379-MI-2 113 290 (1)PROJECT COST INCLUDES CONSTRUCTION COST PLUS AN ALLOWANCE OF 22%FOR ENGINEERING,INSPECTION,AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION. a I I a I l I I I I I I I I I I I I MASTER PLAN FOR ORANGE PARK ACRES SEWER SYSTEM CONTRACT NO.7.19 CLASS"B-EASEMENT COST 24 (SIFT) COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7OF ORANGE COUNTY PROJECT COST 78 (SIM 2/23/94 OC-007-155-01 SERVICE TRUNK TOTALSEWER TOTALSEWER CLASS"A" CLASS"B" CLASS'B" SEWER SEWER AREA SEWER REQUIREDPER REQUIRED PER EASEMENT EASEMENT PROJECT(1) EASEMENT SERVICE SERVICE ASSESSOR LOT LENGTH SUB-AREA AREA LENGTH LENGTH COST COST AREA SUB-AREA PARCELNO. NO. (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) S S 379.531-11 114 93452-13 115 379-501-7 116 390 379-5014 117 379.501-9 US 350 93452-17 119 93451-17 120 93452-16 121 370 93451-10 122 93451-I8 123 93451.7 124 720 93441-19 125 93441-17 126 93441-12 127 270 934514 128 3,810 297,180 0 'IA' 379-531-5 JAI 55 379-531-2 IA2 379-551-12 IA3 379-513.1 IA4 340 379-551-6 IA5 379-551-7 IA6 379-541-14 IA7 120 379-541-13 JAB (1)PROJECT COST INCLUDES CONSTRUCTION COST PLUS AN ALLOWANCE OF 22%FOR ENGINEERING,INSPECTION,AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION. -12- MASTER PLAN FOR ORANGE PARK ACRES SEWER SYSTEM CONTRACT NO.7-19 CLASS'B'EASEMENT COST 24 (SIFT) COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7 OF ORANGE COUNTY PROJECT COST 78 (SIFT) N2394 OCC07-1554H SERVICE TRUNK TOTALSEWER TOTALSEWER CLASS'A' CLASS'B' CLASS'B' SEWER SEWER AREA SEWER REQUIRED PER REQUIRED PER EASEMENT EASEMENT PROJECT(1) EASEMENT SERVICE SERVICE ASSESSOR LOT LENGTH SUB-AREA AREA LENGTH LENGTH COST COST AREA SUB-AREA PARCEL NO. NO. (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FTJ (FT.) S S 379-541-12 IA9 175 379-541-11 IA10 379-541-10 1AII 379-531-3 IA12 145 379-351-8 IA13 935 65,130 0 'IC' 379-501.6 ICI 325 379-501.5 TC2 379.531-14 IC3 379-5314 TC4 379.531-8 TCS 380 379-531-7 IC6 379-531.6 IC7 75 780 60,840 0 'ICA' 379491-10 1CA1 379491-11 1CA2 379-5014 ]CAI 379-SOI-3 ICA4 400 345 400 31.200 0 'ID' 93452-12 IDI 379-061.7 TD2 3794)61-26 ID3 410 (1)PROJECT COST INCLUDES CONSTRUCTION COST PLUS AN ALLOWANCE OF 22%FOR ENGINEERING,INSPECTION,AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION. t t ( t I 1 I I I t I I I t I I 1 I l -13- MASTER PLAN FOR ORANGE PARK ACRES SEWER SYSTEM CONTRACT NO.7-I8 CLASS'B'EASEMENT COST 24 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7 OF ORANGE COUNTY PROJECT COST 78 (SLFT) N23/94 OC-L'07-155-01 SERVICE TRUNK TOTALSEWER TOTALSEWER CLASS-A' CLASS'B' CLASS'B' SEWER SEWER AREA SEWER REQUIRED PER REQUIRED PER EASEMENT EASEMENT PROJECT(1) EASEMENT SERVICE SERVICE ASSESSOR LOT LENGTH SUB-AREA AREA LENGTH LENGTH COST COST AREA SUB-AREA PARCELNO. NO. (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) TO (FT.) $ 4 379-061-25 ID4 379-0614 ID5 350 315 379-061-5 IDS 379-061-37 ID7 379-061-27 IDS 365 365 379.061-29 ID9 235 235 379-061-12 ID10 379-061-11 ID11 1,360 106,080 0 'IDA' 93452-20 IDAI 130 93.45E-19 IDA2 93452-18 IDA3 365 315 495 38,610 0 'IE' 93451-16 IEI 145 145 11,310 0 'IF' 93452-14 IFI 93452-15 IF2 395 360 395 30,810 0 e1G' 93451-19 IGI 420 9345141 IG2 93451-22 IG3 (1)PROJECT COST INCLUDES CONSTRUCTION COST PLUS AN ALLOWANCE OF 22%FOR ENGINEERING,INSPECTION,AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION. -14- MASTER PLAN FOR ORANGE PARK ACRES SEWER SYSTEM CONFRACTNO.7-18 CLASS'B'EASEMENT COST 24 (SIFT) COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.70F ORANGE COUNTY PROJECT COST 78 ($/F ) 223/94 OCC07-155-01 SERVICE TRUNK TOTALSEWER TOTAL SEWER CLASS"A' CLASS"B" CLASS"B" SEWER SEWER AREA SEWER REQUIRED PER REQUIRED PER EASEMENT EASEMENT PROJECT(1) EASEMENT SERVICE SERVICE ASSESSOR LOT LENGTH SUB-AREA AREA LENGTH LENGTH COST COST AREA SUB-AREA PARCEL NO. NO. (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) UT.) (FT.) $ S 9345140 IG4 260 660 680 53,040 15,840 'IN' 93451-14 IHI 270 250 934514 I112 135 135 9345I-39 DO 93451-27 IH4 93451-33 IHS 93451-34 IH6 93451-31 1117 390 390 93451-29 IHS 79$ 62,010 0 WPM 77mm 'K' 379461-34 KI 379-061-39 K2 379-061-38 13 315 280 379-061-35 K4 3137WREN 1 77m 77 7,'E''>: 'M" 379-201-2 M4 230 379403-13 M5 379-203-8 M6 379-201-3 M7 379-2014 MS 435 (1)PROJECT COST INCLUDES CONSTRUCTION COST PLUS AN ALLOWANCE OF 22%FOR ENGINEERING,INSPECTION,AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION. .,5. MASTER PLAN FOR ORANGE PARK ACRES SEWER SYSTEM CONTRACTNO.7-18 CLASS'B'EASEMENT COST 24 (S/FH COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7 OF ORANGE COUNTY PROJECT COST 78 (SIFT) 223/94 OC-007-155-01 SERVICE TRUNK TOTAL SEWER TOTALSEWER CLASS'A" CLASS"B' CLASS"B" SEWER SEWER AREA SEWER REQUIREDPER REQUIREDPER EASEMENT EASEMENT PROJECT(l) EASEMENT SERVICE SERVICE ASSESSOR LOT LENGTH SUB-AREA AREA LENGTH LENGTH COST COST AREA SUB-AREA PARCELNO. NO. (FT.) (FT) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) S 9 379-201-5 M9 379-203-11 M10 230 995 69,810 0 379-203-3 MA2 600 570 379-203-4 MA3 379-203.5 MA4 379-203.9 MAS 350 350 379-203.10 MA6 300 300 1,250 97,500 0 'N' 379-06144 NI 3794161/3 N2 379461-32 N3 410 379412-1 N4 379411-3 NS 85 93441-19 N6 93M1-21 N7 280 230 379441-18 N8 93441-22 N9 390 150 240 93- 11-35 N10 93-441-38 N11 93- 11-37 NI2 93.441-27 N13 (1)PROJECT COST INCLUDES CONSTRUCTION COST PLUS AN ALLOWANCE OF 22%FOR ENGNEERING,INSPECTION,AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION. -Ifi- MASTER PLAN FOR ORANGE PARK ACRES SEWER SYSTEM CON7RACTNO.7G8 CLASS"W EASEMENT COST 24 (SIFT) COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7 OF ORANGE COUNTY PROJECT COST 78 (SIFT) 2123/94 OC-007-155431 SERVICE TRUNK TOTALSEWER TOTAL SEWER CLASS'A' CLASS'B' CLASS"B' SEWER SEWER AREA SEWER REQUIRED PER REQUIRED PER EASEMENT EASEMENT PROJECT(1) EASEMENT SERVICE SERVICE ASSESSOR LOT LENGTH SUB-AREA AREA LENGTH LENGTH COST COST AREA SUB-AREA PARCEL NO. NO. (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) S S 93441-26 NN 420 300 93441-29 N15 310 525 93452-II NIS 340 115 93452-8 HIT 100 93452-10 NIB 93452.9 N19 300 300 2,535 197,730 23,520 'NA' 3794114 NAI 379411-5 NA2 350 350 27,300 0 'NB' 93441-29 NB1 170 379461-31 N82 255 93441-25 NBD 93452-7 HIM 93441-23 NBS 360 305 785 61,230 0 'NC' 93441-33 NCI 200 200 379411.17 NC2 200 15,600 0 'ND' 93441.5 NDI 135 140 133 10,530 140 (1)PROJECT COST INCLUDES CONSTRUCTION COST PLUS AN ALLOWANCE OF 22%FOR ENGINEERING,INSPECTION,AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION. -17- MASTER PLAN FOR ORANGE PARK ACRES SEWER SYSTEM CONTRACT NO.7.18 CLASS"B"EASEMENT COST 24 (E/FT) COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7 OF ORANGE COUNTY PROJECTCOST 78 (E/FT) 223/94 OC-007-155-01 SERVICE TRUNK TOTALSEWER TOTALSEWER CLASS'A' CLASS'B' CLASS"B- SEWER SEWER AREA SEWER REQUIRED PER REQUIRED PER EASEMENT EASEMENT PROJECT(1) EASEMENT SERVICE SERVICE ASSESSOR LOT LENGTH SUB-AREA AREA LENGTH LENGTH COST COST AREA SUB-AREA PARCEL NO. NO. (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) E E .0. 93443-35 OI 140 93443-10 02 440 379411.6 03 93443-24 04 155 379-0IIQ 05 93442.21 06 380 93442-20 07 93441-36 08 93442-14 09 230 93441-16 010 Oil 9344241 012 340 93442.E 013 934414 014 170 93441.3 015 120 93442-5 016 93442-3 017 93441-2 018 93442-2 019 934424 020 390 93451-1 021 93441-39 022 93442-22 023 2,365 194,470 0 'OA' 93443-36 OAI 255 93443.32 OA2 310 260 9344343 Om (1)PROJECT COST INCLUDES CONSTRUCTION COST PLUS AN ALLOWANCE OF 22%FOR ENGINEERING,INSPECTION.AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION. ae- MASTER PLAN FOR ORANGE PARK ACRES SEWER SYSTEM CONTRACT NO.7-19 CLASS'B'EASEMENT COST 24 (SIFT) COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7 OF ORANGE COUNTY PROJECTCOST 78 (SIFT) 2(23i94 OC-007-155A1 SERVICE TRUNK TOTALSEWER TOTALSEWER CLASS'A' CLASS'B' CLASS'B' SEWER SEWER AREA SEWER REQUIRED PER REQUIRED PER EASEMENT EASEMENT PROJECT(1) EASEMENT SERVICE SERVICE ASSESSOR LOT LENGTH SUB-AREA AREA LENGTH LENGTH COST COST AREA SUB-AREA PARCEL NO. NO. (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) S $ 9344347 OA4 9344349 OA5 9344348 OA6 325 325 890 69,420 0 .OB. 93443.23 OBI 934U-19 0132 93443-20 OB3 470 430 470 36,660 0 'OC' OCI 934 2.15 OC2 410 375 410 31,980 0 'OD' 93442-10 OD] 93442-18 OD2 500 460 93442-17 OD3 93442-19 OD4 200 200 700 54,600 0 'OE' 93442-8 OEI 320 300 934424 OE2 320 24,960 0 .P' 93443-25 P1 220 93443-37 P2 340 290 9344342 P3 (1)PROJECT COST INCLUDES CONSTRUCTION COST PLUS AN ALLOWANCE OF 22%FOR ENGINEERING,INSPECTION,AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION. 1 I 1 I 1 I I I I I I 1 1 I 1 I I I I -19- MASTER PLAN FOR ORANGE PARK ACRES SEWER SYSTEM CONFRACTNO.7-IS CLASS'B"EASEMENT COST 24 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7 OF ORANGE COUNTY PROJECTCOST 78 (SIFT) 2/23194 OCC07-155-01 SERVICE TRUNK TOTAL SEWER TOTAL SEWER CLASS'A' CLASS"B" CLASS"B" SEWER SEWER AREA SEWER REQUIRED PER REQUIRED PER EASEMENT EASEMENT PROJECT(1) EASEMENT SERVICE SERVICE ASSESSOR LOT LENGTH SUB-AREA AREA LENGTH LENGTH COST COST AREA SUB-AREA PARCEL NO. NO. (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) E E 9344341 P4 9344340 P5 93443-39 P6 93443-29 P7 93443-26 PB 330 330 9344345 P9 9344346 PIO 890 69,420 0 "PA' 93443-33 PAI 245 245 19,110 0 379-291-24 QI 379-291-25 Q2 350 290 379-281-26 Q3 379-281-27 Q4 379491-28 Q5 379-291-29 Q6 460 425 379-281-23 Q7 100 93443-34 Q8 93443-5 Q9 260 210 93443-22 Q10 93443-13 QII 9344342 Q12 275 275 93443-14 Q13 93443-21 Q14 93443-15 Q15 230 230 1.675 (1)PROJECT COST INCLUDES CONSTRUCTION COST PLUS AN ALLOWANCE OF 22%FOR ENGINEERING,INSPECTION,AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION. l I l 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 [ 1 1 I 1 1 l -to- MASTER PLAN FOR ORANGE PARK ACRES SEWER SYSTEM CONTRACTNO.7-18 CLASS'B'EASEMENT COST 24 (m) COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. OF ORANGE COUNTY PROJECT COST 78 (SIFT) 223/94 OC-007-1554J1 SERVICE TRUNK TOTALSEWER TOTALSEWER CLASS'A' CLASS'B' CLASS-B' SEWER SEWER AREA SEWER REQUIRED PER REQUIRED PER EASEMENT EASEMENT PROJECTU) EASEMENT SERVICE SERVICE ASSESSOR LOT LENGTH SUB-AREA AREA LENGTH LENGTH COST COST AREA SUB-AREA PARCEL NO. NO. (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) S $ 'R' 393-291-6 RI I00 393-291-7 R2 393-291.9 R3 210 230 'T' 393-292-1 TI 393-292.2 T2 393-292.3 T1 650 393-2924 T4 393-292.5 TS 360 393-292.6 T6 393-292.8 TB 393-291-1 T9 393-291-2 TIO 393.291.3 TH 265 393-2914 T12 393-292-5 T13 180 .U. 379.573.9 UI 245 379.573.10 U2 379491-9 U3 379-541-5 U4 379-54I-6 US 379-541.7 U6 395 379441-9 U7 379-441.10 US 520 475 379491-2 U9 340 150 (1)PROJECT COST INCLUDES CONSTRUCTION COST PLUS AN ALLOWANCE OF 22%FOR ENGINEERING,INSPECTION,AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION. I t I t t t t t t .21. MASTER PLAN FOR ORANGE PARK ACRES SEWER SYSTEM CONTRACT NO.7-18 CLASS'B'EASEMENT COST 24 (SM1'q COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7 OF ORANGE COUNTY PROJECT COST 78 2/23/94 OC-007-155-01 SERVICE TRUNK TOTAL SEWER TOTALSEWER CLASS'A' CLASS'B' CLASS'B' SEWER SEWER AREA SEWER REQUIRED PER REQUIRED PER EASEMENT EASEMENT PROJECT(1) EASEMENT SERVICE SERVICE ASSESSOR LOT LENGTH SUB-AREA AREA LENGTH LENGTH COST COST AREA SUB-AREA PARCEL NO. NO. (FTJ (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) $ S 379441-5 UIO 379421-22 UII 230 379421-11 U12 379491.1 U13 26D 379491-I4 U14 379491-12 U15 379421-10 U16 379-501-2 U17 379-501.1 U18 31D 93451-12 U19 379421-9 U20 290 93451-11 U21 379421-8 U22 455 135 379421-7 U23 379441-20 U24 465 28D 3,210 250,390 3L920 'UA' 379-541.8 UA1 250 379-541.9 UA2 300 37949" Um 379-5314 UA4 379441-11 UAS 379441-19 UA6 550 42,900 0 'UB' 379441-8 UBI 260 75 3794414 UO2 370 340 379481-13 UO3 115 115 180 745 58,110 14.280 (1)PROJECTCOST INCLUDES CONSTRUCTION COST PLUS AN ALLOWANCE OF 22%FOR ENGINEERING,INSPECTION,AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION. 1 1 l [ 1 I [ [ 1 l [ [ 1 [ l [ t [ [ .22. MASTER PLAN FOR ORANGE PARK ACRES SEWER SYSTEM CONTRACT NO.7.18 CUSS-B'EASEMENT COST 24 (SIFT) COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.70F ORANGE COUNTY PROJECT COST 78 (SIFT) 2123/94 OC-007-155-01 SERVICE TRUNK TOTALSEWER TOTALSEWER CLASS'A' CLASS'B' CLASS"B' SEWER SEWER AREA SEWER REQUIRED PER REQUIRED PER EASEMENT EASEMENT PROJECT(1) EASEMENT SERVICE SERVICE ASSESSOR LOT LENGTH SUB-AREA AREA LENGTH LENGTH COST COST AREA SUB-AREA PARCEL NO. NO. (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) I E 'UBA' 379441-7 UBAI 110 110 379441-6 UBA2 379441-3 UBA3 110 9.580 0 'UC" 379491-13 LIM 379491-7 UC2 379491-8 UC3 379.441-14 UC4 37944143 UC5 470 470 36,660 0 'UD' 379461-13 UDI 3794414 UD2 379481-14 UD3 490 379461.12 UD4 379481-15 UDS 379461-11 LIM 379461-2 UD7 379461-25 UD8 379461-10 UD9 3794614 UDIO 379461-9 UDII 530 1.020 79,560 0 'ODA' 379421-21 UDAI 379421-20 UDA2 379461-14 UDA3 (1)PROJECT COST INCLUDES CONSTRUCTION COST PLUS AN ALLOWANCE OF 22%FOR ENGINEERING,INSPECTION,AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION. 1 I 1 l 1 1 l ( i 1 l 1 1 ( 1 ( 1 ( [ -23- MASTER PLAN FOR ORANGE PARK ACRES SEWER SYSTEM CONTRACT NO.749 CLASS"B"EASEMENT COST 24 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7 OF ORANGE COUNTY PROJECTCOST 78 (E/FT) 223/94 OCL07-15541 SERVICE TRUNK TOTALSEWER TOTALSEWER CLASS"A' CLASS'B' CLASS-B- SEWER SEWER AREA SEWER REQUIRED PER REQUIRED PER EASEMENT EASEMENT PROJECT(1) EASEMENT SERVICE SERVICE ASSESSOR LOT LENGTH SUB-AREA AREA LENGTH LENGTH COST COST AREA SUB-AREA PARCEL NO. NO. (FT) (FT.) (FTJ (FT.) (FT.) E E 379461-16 UDA4 405 380 379461-17 UDAS 379421-31 UDA6 379421-30 UDA7 379-161-33 UDAS 445 445 850 66,300 0 '11E' 379421-12 UEI 379421-14 UE2 595 570 379421-13 UE3 595 46,410 0 'V" 379451-21 VI 310 270 379451-20 V2 379461-20 V3 325 325 379481-1 V4 450 450 1,085 'WA' 379-551-10 WAI 455 410 379-551-9 WA3 455 35,490 9,940 "WB" 379-561-7 Will 180 150 379-5614 WB2. 180 14,N0 3,600 4W V7 77771,,,445 (1)PROJECT COST INCLUDES CONSTRUCTION COST PLUS AN ALLOWANCE OF 22%FOR ENGINEERING,INSPECTION,AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION. .24. MASTER PLAN FOR ORANGE PARK ACRES SEWER SYSTEM CONTRACT NO.7-I8 CLASS'B'EASEMENT COST 24 (SIFT) COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7 OF ORANGE COUNTY PROJECT COST 78 (SIFT) 2/23194 OC.007-155-01 SERVICE TRUNK TOTALSEWER TOTALSEWER CLASS'A' CLASS-B' CLASS'B' SEWER SEWER AREA SEWER REQUIREDPER REQUIRED PER EASEMENT EASEMENT PROJECT(1) EASEMENT SERVICE SERVICE ASSESSOR LOT LENGTH SUB-AREA AREA LENGTH LENGTH COST COST AREA SUB-AREA PARCELNO. NO. (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) S S TOTAL SEWER REQUIRED FOR DISTRICT 39,035 12,915 4,995 $3,044,730 $119.MO (U PROJECT COST INCLUDES CONSTRUCTION COST PLUS AN ALLOWANCE OF 22%FOR ENGINEERING,INSPECTION,AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION. r r MASTER PLAN FOR THE COWAN HEIGHTS r SEWER SYSTEM r Contract No. 7-19 Wee County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County .. r QPOFES Sin N e`°� EUGENEg q�f rEncyneerincl No.C17714 • • • .:6!30N7 r fq Vll� �1 OF CAUFOQ' Newpon Beach.CA 92658-9020 r r OCTOBER 1994 OC-007-155-00 r County Sanitation District Number 7 of Orange County COWAN HEIGHTS SEWER PLAN r OCTOBER 1994 1 GENERAL Cowan Heights is an unincorporated area in the County of Orange encompassed by the City of Orange r from the north,the City of Tustin from the east,and Lemon Heights(another unincorporated area)from the south. The study area is made up of approximately 171 acres and is located southeast of Newport r Blvd, north of Sirrine and Deerhill Drive,and southwest of Peters Canyon Regional Park. The terrain is r hilly with steep areas to the south near Clearview Lane. Public roads provide access to nearly all of the homes in the area and may not follow contour patterns. The sewer study has identified 165 parcel lots that will require construction of various sewers to outfalls in order to be serviced. Of the 165 parcel lots, 10 are undeveloped. II TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING Topographic mapping of the study area was flown on July 9, 1991 and prepared by Rattray&Associates r Inc. The study area was mapped with 2-foot contour intervals showing curbs and gutters,street striping, ,r existing homes,trees, swimming pools,and various other structures. The maps are stored on ten digital floppy disks in the micro-station format. Property lines,public and private access road easements,right-of-way,and centerline information was obtained from record of surveys,recorded tract and parcel maps and have been mapped in micro-station format and superimposed on the topographic base maps. Existing sewers have been mapped from sewer atlases and construction drawings with invert elevations shown. With the use of micro-station,the base maps can be printed out to any scale. The aerial photographs were flown for 1"=40'base map reproduction which is the scale recommended for concoction drawings. r r III PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING A. Drainage general drainage pattern for a large portion of the study area that is east of Rangeview Drive is southeast toward the City of Tustin. The remaining study area which is west of Rangeview Drive drains ` north toward the City of Orange with the exception of one small portion of area that drains south into County Sanitation facilities(see service area"C"on sewer plan figure). A ridge line located along Brier r Lane splits three service areas in the northwest and southeast directions and the high point of the study area is located in the southern portion of the study area near Clearview Lane. B. Sewage System Preliminary Design The study area was subdivided into four main sewer service areas with twenty-three sub-service areas and four proposed trunk systems. Each proposed trunk system connects to a nearby existing trunk outfall owned either by the City of Orange,the County Sanitation District(local sewers),or the Harvard Avenue r Trunk(HAT). The HAT trunk is owned by the Irvine Ranch Water District(IRWD). ` There are twenty-seven trunks and subtrunks to the main systems which have parcels assigned to them. The trunks and subtrunks are coded alphabetically in a clockwise manner. Parcel lot assignments are also coded alphabetically to the particular letter code of the trunk or subtrunk to which the house lateral r will ultimately connect to for sewer service. Parcel lots that are within the study area and have direct access to an existing sewer, owned by the City r of Orange or the Sanitation District,are part of the "BK"system(see Sewer Plan Figure near intersection of Cowan Heights Drive and Brier Lane). These lots should be excluded from the study and thus from any proposed assessment district. The Sanitation Districts policy permits direct connections to trunks or �+ subtrunks up to and including 24 inches in diameter and likewise the City of Orange and the IRWD will permit connections to their sewers subject to meeting their requirements. COWAN HEIGHTS SEWER PLAN -2- OCTOBER ISN r r Sewer service area "A" is located in the southeast portion of the study area and drains toward the east into the HAT trunk which eventually drains into Sanitation District No. 14. Sewer service areas"B"and r "D"are located in the northwest portion of the study area and drain north into a sewer owned by the City of Orange. This outfall is located near the intersection of Skylark Place and Newport Blvd. Sewer service area"C",which is also located in the northwest portion of the study area,drains south into the County Sanitation facilities. .y This sewer plan was developed to operate as an "all gravity system"for the entire study area, so some sewers had to be located along the side property lines due to irregular topography. The "A"and "B.' trunks are such examples. It should be noted that maintenance where vehicular access is not feasible, small portable equipment may need to be carried to the site. But since most of the sewers in these areas will have a steep slope with corresponding high flow velocities,the required maintenance should be less frequent than normally experienced. r C. Easements Full implementation of the sewer plan will require acquisition of 58 separate permanent easements over s private property and private access roads. Four of these easements lie in private roads serving more than one property and are noted as Class "A"easements on the data spreadsheet. It is assumed that Class "A" easements will be dedicated free of charge to the District as the various sewer projects develop. This has .. been the ease for similar projects located in District No. 7, such as the Lemon Heights project. The other 54 permanent easements are located along the side or rear property lines of individual lots. r They are required because of the topographic relationship to the various drainage areas. These easements are noted as Class"B" on the data spreadsheet. As in the past,easements in similar projects in District No. 7 have been dedicated free of charge. Also note that easements through Peters Canyon e. Regional Park were classified as Class"B"easements and will need to be acquired from the County of Orange for the "A"and "B"trunk system(see Sewer Plan Figure). It should be noted that some temporary construction easements may be required,although they cannot be r identified at this time. Usually,there is no or minimal cost associated with such temporary easements. COWAN HEIGHTS SEWER PLAN 3 OCTOBER 1994 r IV DATA SHEETS r Lot assignments to specific trunks and subtrunks as noted on the topographic sewer study map are presented in tabular form on the data spreadsheet. The Orange County Assessor's parcel number for each r lot is also given with each lot identification number. Trunk sewer lengths posted apply to the length of r line in the public and private roads,and to proposed sewers that are adjacent or cut across private property. Class "A"easements lengths apply to sewer lengths that are in private access roads and Class "B" casements apply to lengths that are in private property. All lengths are approximate and will be refined in the final design. V PROJECT COST&CLASS "W EASEMENTS COST Project cost and Class "B"easement cost are estimated for each sewer service area and are included on r the data spreadsheet. The project costs are based on a$78 per lineal foot of sewer,that includes construction costs plus an allowance of 22 percent for engineering, inspection,construction surveying, and contract administration. Class "B"easements are based on a 20-foot wide permanent easement at a cost of a$1.20 per square foot. This criteria is in accordance with the District staffs recommendation. Other costs associated with implementation of the sewer system, such as annexation and connection fees, assessment district costs, and homeowner costs are not included in the project costs. The total project and Class "B" easement costs arc$2.7 million and$470 thousand respectively. For those sewer service areas which have sub-service areas,the costs are further broken down for each sub-service area(see data spreadsheet at the end of this report). In some of the large service areas,such as Area"A"there are Considerable possibilities for Constmetion projects independent of the entire service area. Project size can influence the construction cost,since usually the larger the project the lower the unit costs. The costs identified on the data spreadsheets where there are sub-service areas are average r costs for the entire service area and are not indicative for any particular project that might be split off r from the whole area. COWAN HEIGHTS SEWER PLAN -0- OCTOSER 19M r Other situations where asub-service area might be the initial project occur in regard to financing the construction of an "outfall trunk" serving the entire service area. As an example,take the case of the r sub-service area"AA". Assume it is the first project in the"A"service area and lots AAl and AA7 wish r to form an assessment district or proceed with a cash up front project. Outfall trunk"A"which connects to the HAT trunk would have to be constructed up to the junction of the"AA"subtrunk. The cost of the r outfall "A"trunk would be split equally between lots AA I through AA7 and the remaining costs for the "AA"trunk would also be split equally since the benefit received for each lot is identical,namely sewer service for a residential lot. However,in the future,as upstream lots build sewers which discharge into r outfall trunk"A",reimbursement to the initial AA through AA7 lot owners should be made on prorated basis taking into account the number of lots served by the outfall portion of the"A"trunk. As properties �+ are sewered upstream of the"A"trunk,they pay for their own construction cost equally(same benefit received)and the initial property owners on"AA"are not reimbursed for their"AA"subtrunk costs to r sewer their lots. r r r r r r r r COWAN HEIGHTS SEWER PLAN -S OCTOBER 1994 r MASTER PLAN FOR THE COWAN HEIGHTS SEWER SYSTEM CONTRACTNO.7.19 CLASS"B"EASEMENTCOST 24 (SIFT) COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7 OF ORANGE COUNTY PROJECT COST 78 1014/94 OC-007.155-M SERVICE TRUNK TOTALSEWER TOTALSEWER CLASS'A' CLASS'B. CLASS'B' SEWER SEWER AREA SEWER REQUIRED PER REQUIRED PER EASEMENT EASEMENT PROJECT(1) EASEMENT SERVICE SERVICE ASSESSOR LOT LENGTH SUB-AREA AREA LENGTH LENGTH COST COST AREA SUB-AREA PARCELNO. NO. (PT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) S $ 'A' 503-241-6 AI 1090 logo 503-241-1 A2 350 350 503-241-5 A3 503-241-2 A4 380 503-2414 A5 503-241-3 A6 590 210 503-271-7 A7 503-271.6 A8 200 340 503-2714 A9 503-271-5 AN 290 503-211.9 All 503-271-10 Al2 503-2714 A13 300 503-271-11 A14 750 400 503-271-12 AIS 430 503-271-19 A16 430 390 503-271-17 A17 503-194-18 AIS 690 680 503-194-22 A19 330 330 503-194-7 A20 320 320 503-194-36 A21 560 503-194-37 A22 503-121-36 A23 503-121-2 A24 560 503-121-37 A25 (1)PROJECT COST INCLUDES CONSTRUCTION COST PLUS AN ALLOWANCE OF 22%FOR ENGINEERING,INSPECTION,AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION. I t [ ( I I I I I I I I I I I I I I [ -7- MASTER PLAN FOR THE COWAN HEIGHTS SEWER SYSTEM CONTRACT NO.7-19 CLASS'B'EASEMENT COST 24 (SIM COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7 OF ORANGE COUNTY PROJECT COST 78 Mn) 10/4/94 OC-007-155-00 SERVICE TRUNK TOTAL SEWER TOTALSEWER CLASS'A' CLASS'B' CLASS"B" SEWER SEWER AREA SEWER REQUIRED PER REQUIREDPER EASEMENT EASEMENT PROJECT(1) EASEMENT SERVICE SERVICE ASSESSOR LOT LENGTH SUB-AREA AREA LENGTH LENGTH COST COST AREA SUB-AREA PARCEL NO. NO. (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) f f 503-121-23 A26 503-121-39 A27 620 6,340 4%.S20 121,690 503-261-5 AAI 410 410 503-2614 AA2 370 370 503-261.3 AA3 530 503-261.2 AA4 530 320 503.261-1 AA5 503-261-13 AA6 503-261-14 AA7 47D 1,79D 139,940 39,120 'AM' 503-261-10 AAA[ 270 503-261-11 AAA2 250 503-261-12 AAA3 200 470 3600 6,000 503-241-15 ABI 503-241-9 AIR 503-241-10 AB3 370 360 503-241.14 AB4 220 330 503-241-12 AB5 400 70 503-242-3 AB6 100 503-242-2 AB7 (1)PROJECT COST INCLUDES CONSTRUCTION COST PLUS AN ALLOWANCE OF 22%FOR ENGINEERING,INSPECTION,AND CONTRACT ADMIMSTRATION. _6. MASTER PLAN FOR THE COWAN HEIGHTS SEWER SYSTEM CONTRACFNO.7-19 CLASS'B'EASEMENT COST 24 ($IFT) COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7 OF ORANGE COUNTY PROJECT COST 78 (SIFT) HIM" OC-007-155-00 SERVICE TRUNK TOTALSEWER TOTALSEWER CLASS A' CLAM'B' CLASS-R' SEWER SEWER AREA SEWER REQUIRED PER REQUIRED PER EASEMENT EASEMENT PROJECT(1) EASEMENT SERVICE SERVICE ASSESSOR LOT LENGTH SUB-AREA AREA LENGTH LENGTH COST COST AREA SUB-AREA PARCEL NO. NO. (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) S $ 503-271-23 ABS 540 503-231-8 AB9 580 1.610 130.260 31,200 'ABA' 503-242-1 ABA] 420 503-271-22 ABA2 600 503-271-21 ARM 503-27I-20 ABM 503-271-19 ABAS 340 1,360 106,080 0 -ABB' 503-171-1 ABBI 503.171-5 ABB2 260 503-172-1 ABB3 260 20,290 0 'AC' 503-2614 ACI 360 503-261-8 AC2 503-261.7 AC3 470 503-2614 AC4 680 503-261-2 AC5 503-261-1 AC6 230 503-2814 AC7 330 503-291-8 ACS 370 503-291-7 AC9 (1)PROJECT COST INCLUDES CONSTRUCTION COST PLUS AN ALLOWANCE OF 22%FOR ENGINEERING,INSPECTION,AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION. -9- MASTER PLAN FOR THE COWAN HEIGHTS SEWER SYSTEM CONTRACT NO.7.19 CLASS'B'EASEMENT COST 24 (SIFT) COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7OFORANGECOUNTY PROJECT COST 78 (m) 1014/94 OCC07-155410 SERVICE TRUNK TOTAL SEWER TOTALSEWER CLASS'A" CLASS'B' CLASS"B" SEWER SEWER AREA SEWER REQUIRED PER REQUIRED PER EASEMENT EASEMENT PROJECT(I) EASEMENT SERVICE SERVICE ASSESSOR LOT LENGTH SUB-AREA AREA LENGTH LENGTH COST COST AREA SUB-AREA PARCELNO. NO. 07.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) E E 503-2824 ACID 550 503-282-5 AC11 300 503-194-1 AC12 400 503-194-2 ACLI 503-292-4 AC14 700 503-194.3 AC15 503-292-5 AC16 5034944 AC17 503-194-5 ACIS 510 503-121-1 AC19 503-121-3 AC20 420 5,320 414,960 0 'ACA" 503-261-I5 ACAI 503-261-16 ACA2 503-261.5 ACAS 320 320 24,960 0 "AE" 503-271-3 AEI 220 503-271-2 AE2 190 503-271-1 AE3 410 410 31,980 9,840 'Al" 503-271-13 AN 270 503-271-16 AF2 (1)PROJECT COST INCLUDES CONSTRUCTION COST PLUS AN ALLOWANCE OF 22%FOR ENGINEERING,INSPECTION,AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION. I I I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 a o- MASTER PLAN FOR THE COWAN HEIGHTS SEWER SYSTEM CONTRACT NO.7-19 CLASS'B'EASEMENT COST 24 (SIM COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7 OF ORANGE COUNTY PROJECTCOST 78 (m) 1014/94 OC-007-155-00 SERVICE TRUNK TOTAL SEWER TOTALSEWER CLASS'A' CLASS-B' CLASS'B' SEWER SEWER AREA SEWER REQUIRED PER REQUIRED PER EASEMENT EASEMENT PROJECT(1) EASEMENT SERVICE SERVICE ASSESSOR LOT LENGTH SUB-AREA AREA LENGTH LENGTH COST COST AREA SUB-AREA PARCEL NO. NO. (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) f f 503-271-15 AF3 503-271.14 AF4 350 290 503-282-9 AFS 503-282-10 AF6 503-282-2 AF7 300 300 503-282-7 AFB 503.282-8 AF9 920 71,760 0 'B' 503-321-13 BI 2570 23" 503.281-1 B2 730 503.291-1 B3 $40 503-312-1 B4 520 503-291-7 B5 503-312-10 B6 340 300 503.292-1 B7 503-301-2 B8 503.301-1 89 530 500 503-2926 B10 503-301-11 B11 290 503-301-10 B12 570 270 503-301.9 B13 420 503-3014 B14 (1)PROJECT COST INCLUDES CONSTRUCTION COST PLUS AN ALLOWANCE OF 22%FOR ENGINEERING,INSPECTION,AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION. MASTER PLAN FORTHE COWAN HEIGHTS SEWER SYSTEM CONTRACT NO.7.19 CLASS"B'EASEMENT COST 24 (SIFT) COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7 OF ORANGE COUNTY PROJECTCOST 78 (SIFT) 10/4/94 GCCB7.155.00 SERVICE TRUNK TOTALSEWER TOTALSEWER CLASS'A' CLASS-8- CLASS"B- SEWER SEWER AREA SEWER REQUIRED PER REQUIRED PER EASEMENT EASEMENT PROJECT(1) EASEMENT SERVICE SERVICE ASSESSOR LOT LENGTH SUB-AREA AREA LENGTH LENGTH COST COST AREA SUBAREA PARCEL NO. NO. (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) E E 503-301.5 BIS 150 503-301-8 B16 560 140 503-301.7 B17 503-30" BIB I50 5,990 467,220 119,520 'BA' 503-281-2 BAI 350 350 503-281-3 BA2 580 503-2814 BA3 503-281.6 BA4 503-281-5 SAS 580 930 72,540 22,320 'BB' 503-321-12 BBI "0 440 503-321.5 BB2 550 503-3214 BB3 550 503-321.7 BB4 990 77,220 23,760 'BC' 503-291-2 BCI 560 503-291-3 BC2 503-2914 BC3 290 270 503-291.5 BC4 950 66,300 6,490 (1)PROJECT COST INCLUDES CONSTRUCTION COST PLUS AN ALLOWANCE OF 22%FOR ENGINEERING,INSPECTION,AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION. l t 1 1 l l 1 1 1 l I 1 l 1 1 8 l 1 1 -Ix- MASTER PLAN FOR THE COWAN HEIGHTS SEWER SYSTEM CONTRACTNO.7-19 CLASS'B'EASEMENT COST 24 (SIM COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7 OF ORANGE COUNTY PROJECT COST 78 (TAUT 1014/94 GCCo7-155-00 SERVICE TRUNK TOTAL SEWER TOTAL SEWER CLASS*A' CLASS'B' CLASS'B' SEWER SEWER AREA SEWER REQUIREDPER REQUIRED PER EASEMENT EASEMENT PROJECT(1) EASEMENT SERVICE SERVICE ASSESSOR LOT LENGTH SUB-AREA AREA LENGTH LENGTH COST COST AREA SUB-AREA PARCEL NO. NO. (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) E E 'BD' 503-321-II BDI 503-321-10 BD2 503.321.9 BD3 503-312-2 BD4 360 503-321-8 BDS 503-312-3 BD6 560 503-312.12 BD7 270 503-312-II BDS 450 140 503-312-9 BD9 503-312-8 9010 240 503-312-5 BD11 503-312-7 BD12 420 180 503-3I2.6 BD13 1,790 139,620 19,920 'BE' 503.291.6 BEI 220 220 220 17,160 5,280 'BF" 503-292-2 BFI 415 503-292-3 BF2 415 32,370 0 -BG' 503-301-3 BO1 330 330 25,740 0 (1)PROJECT COST INCLUDES CONSTRUCTION COST PLUS AN ALLOWANCE OF 22%FOR ENGINEERING,INSPECTION,AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION. -13- MASTER PLAN FORTHE COWAN HEIGHTS SEWER SYSTEM CONTRACT NO.7.19 CLASS'B'EASEMENT COST 24 (SIFT) COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7 OF ORANGE COUNTY PROJECT COST 78 (SIFT) 10/4N4 OCC07-155-00 SERVICE TRUNK TOTAL SEWER TOTALSEWER CLASS'A' CLASS'B' CLASS'0' SEWER SEWER AREA SEWER REQUIRED PER REQUIRED PER EASEMENT EASEMENT PROJECT(1) EASEMENT SERVICE SERVICE ASSESSOR LOT LENGTH SUB-AREA AREA LENGTH LENGTH COST COST AREA SUB-AREA PARCEL NO. NO. (FT.) (FT) (FT.) (FT.) (FTJ f f -BH' 503-292-7 BHI 390 340 503-302.5 BIG 390 0 8,160 '11' 503.302-3 B11 350 310 503-302-2 1112 $03-302-1 B13 240 590 46,020 7.440 .BK. 503-121-5 BKI 503-3032 BK2 503-112-1 BK3 503-112-2 BK4 0 0 0 973.830 212.880 'C' 503-591-1 CI 503.581-3 C2 490 330 503-5814 C3 350 503-311.6 C4 503-311-19 CS 470 320 503-58" C6 503-311-17 C7 503-311-16 CS (H PROJECT COST INCLUDES CONSTRUCTION COST PLUS AN ALLOWANCE OF 22%FOR ENGINEERING,INSPECTION,AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION. -14- MASTER PLAN FOR THE COWAN HEIGHTS SEWER SYSTEM CONTRACT NO.7.19 CLASS'B'EASEMENT COST 24 (SIFT) COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7 OF ORANGE COUNTY PROJECT COST 78 (SIFT) 1N4M OCL07-1554 0 SERVICE TRUNK TOTAL SEWER TOTALSEWER CLASS'A' CLASS-B' CLASS'R. SEWER SEWER AREA SEWER REQUIRED PER REQUIRED PER EASEMENT EASEMENT PROJECT(1) EASEMENT SERVICE SERVICE ASSESSOR LOT LENGTH SUB-AREA AREA LENGTH LENGTH COST COST AREA SUB-AREA PARCEL NO. NO. (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (Fr.) S f 503-311-I9 C9 150 503-31[A CIO 1,310 IO2,I d0 I9.200 'CA' 503-311-1 CAI 250 250 250 19,500 6.000 WPM 'D' M3-5814 DI 503-5916 m 1160 503-591-5 D3 303-321-2 DI 360 340 503-321-I US 1,520 118.560 8,160 'DA' 503-321-14 DAI 660 503-321-15 DA2 503-3214 DA3 670 670 32.260 15.940 TOTAL SEWER REQUIRED FOR DISTRICT 35.095 1,140 19.590 $2.736,630 5469,920 (H PROJECT COST INCLUDES CONSTRUCTION COST PLUS AN ALLOWANCE OF 22%FOR ENGINEERING,INSPECTION,AND CONTRACT ADMMISTRATION. SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA DISTRICTS'ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 REGULAR MEETING JULY 26, 1995-7:30 P.M. RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 Minute excerpts have been received as set forth below. Pursuant to Regular Agenda Item No. 3, it is appropriate to receive and file said excerpts: (3) (a) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpt from the City of Seal Beach re election of mayor and appointment of alternate Director to the Mayor and seating a new member of the Board: ('Mayor) Active Director Alternate Director George Brown Marilyn Bruce Hastings' (b) Consideration of motion to receive and file any minute excerpts received subsequent to preparation of supplemental agenda, if any BACKGROUND ORGANIZATION RESTRUCTURING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT F The County Sanituon Districts of Orange County I aUnces)is a publicly owned BUDGET FORMAT The budget format was also improved this year,and now The appointment of a new General Manager in fiscal year 1994-95 was the Because wastewater flow projections far I wastewater treatment agency Nat provides sewage collection,treatment and includes a broad Overview of the crevices financial condition:a complete listing of working Point for a major restructuring of the Sanitbon District and the decreased form the projected 319 relief it disposal services for approximately 2,24 million people In central and northwest fiscal policies(along with a checklist to verify our compliance stWst Me major beginning of a navy eirst of Improvement,As part of this ms"ctunng.the Joint to Poll estimates of 275 mgd(a 13.5 Orange County.The Districts operate and maintain the third largest fecilivas of assumptions used W develop the proposed revenues and expanses: and division Boards approved the morgamemice of Me Districts'rep management team and improvement projects called for in the Me Moir kind on the West Coast Financed by service and connection fees, retrainee that include orgenizadon charts,stiffing trends,seMce descriptions, established eem Assiseen[General Manager positions to oversee Operations and reevalualetl. property tax revenues, investment interest and barorwing,Me Districts' performance measures and results.seem brands and budget summaries. Administration.Adtliaonal major changes for 1995-96 include: financial management program includes the following: The performance measures for 1995-96 also have a Guenuteme Results As a result of We powndal losses from th OJeint Works and Individual District Capital Facilities Budgets section Net is designed W provide a method of measuring actual results. O Rearganizing Maintenance and Operauons into two separate nurtured decreases in projected wastes OJaint Works and Individual District Operations The Capital Ducey Revolving Fund(CaRFI illustrated project bookie[is also departments. capital Improvement budget has been red and Maintenance Budgets included aloe with individual project could sheet W help Me reader better pert nt fropercem (rem993-8 ion ere budget of$ g g P I P O and All lung the Compliance.Conservation,Recycle and Reuse, percent from the 199394 budget of$]C O Debt Servicing understand the nature and need of the necessary capital improvements. and Air Quality Divisions of the Technical Services Department into The Joint Works budget includes all miminenho on,operators,maintenance the Environmental Management Division. A critical and com,Mha,O.rerv.of tM and copse facilities costs that benefit all Districts. fiscal year to determine the race a[which O Evablishrng tenor separate divisions for the planning and design improvements during the next 5 years. HIGHLIGHTS �I fir PERFORMANCE MEASURES functions within the Engineering Department. QUANTIFYING OUR EFFORTS The Oiaticts have historically provided O Transforming tithe Information Services Deal which used W be a Fiscal year 1994 95 was particularly nouewal be apse of wastewater collector,treatment and dispose)services at Me lowest possible part of the Finance Department Ina,Me Information Technology Me Orange County Investment Pool(OCIPI in December and subsequent coat,while still maintaining our commitment W balanced WWI environmentl Department. TRAINING AND STAFF DE1 d effiration of bankruptcy by the County of Orange.The Oistice;had$454 management.A good way W evaluate him well we're doing is W compare our million invested in the OCIP et the tlma and have recovered approximately O Transferring the Department payroll Finance announce from the Human vetted operation and maintenance noses per million gallonsLion of M weetwaelr Resources Oe arunent W the Finance Department. Unqugh unavbfy,the easiest way W Changr $341 million as fiscal year 1995-96 begins. It is hoped Mat the balance of created with other agencies.According W Ma Association of Metropolitan p p NmugM1 terming.Trials paruculeAy roue a $113 million will be paid over time through recovery claims and potential Sawerage Agencies(AMSAI 1993 survey of wen 100 other wastewater O Establishing a Treining.Safety and Emergency Response O'vision of the melon goals of the lap a is topriem mpron, proceeds from liugauon,but the eventual settlement is uncar[ein, treatment agencies nationwide.the Districts'19941995 average cost of$538 within Human Resources. during 199596 is W tlevelop a comprehe Other major budget developments Involved the hiring of a new General ...in the lowest 15 Percent. needs of our employees in all poets of We O Centralizing the functions of public roll editing and writing and subsequent reorganization changes,including the asWblishmen[ This cosepermillion gallons of wastewater ueattl performance measure Is a support,graphic services,multimedia services,the receptionist, During their review of Human Resources, of two Assistant General Manager positions,the eppidnorne nt of tithe Director tangible indicator of how well we're keeping ' of Finance ae the Districts'Treasure[the development of our own investment g Ping coats tlwvn,end gives us an the mailroom, and printing and reproeneral services o anew Erns[ o Young recommended rhst more t policy,Nee i pellet out in BENCHMARK Nat we can use ie sae if the performance measures Communiceuons Division within the General Managers office. areas of salary.technical and manegemer p ry, ents. and a of an independent expanded outside money manager W M1erMle spelled am the budget(and the results achieved)Op for each tlts by M department and our investments, and enhanced and expended controls over raeM1 division are working.Dividing the budgeted Joint,Operating costa by the Other major arganizatienel changes include privatizing security services,with the In 199495,the Olsmet budgeted$1]` management, assignment of 24hourpe"er,security contact administration placed with We WWI salaries.According W the American ptafecetl flow for g M man yields a cue[For million gallons of$$638fins However, During 199495,the public accounting antl consulting fine of Ernst 6 Young stall will be working W manage un511etl poatlone and elective expenses W reduce Operations Department.and Me addition of four new analyst Feathers placed Development(ASTO),many of the netioni conducted several review project.The renews included a Performance this figure W a target cunt of$599 per million gallons.Stiff will continue W play throughout the pN.M.uo, companies spend 2 percent of payroll on Measurement Assessment,and separate evaluations of Operations and the key roll in keeping also figure as low as Feasible.Figure A shows the recommends an ultimate goal of 4 pereer Maintenance.Finance,Human Resources,and our capital improvement District'everege cos[of processing one million gallons of wastewaer for each of TREASURY MANAGEMENT training 30 Percent of its employees. process. Many of the recommendations Wet came from these reviews the lest five years. Including Me budgeted and target goals for 1995-96. became the foundauon for some of Nee roved budget requests and Until the County bankruptcy,the County Treasurer also served as the Dlseicts' Based on the above findings,recommend PP 9 q 199596 budget regent a Well veining I Improvement approved for fiscal War 19fil discussed later in this Figure A Treasurer end managed OCI )Me As aar Idle cash and resurvey within the Orange approximstly 2 P.M..of t.I salaries. pamphlet. HISTORICAL COST PEA MILLION GALLONS TREATED settlement, Investment Pool with the As a result Ot the bankruptcy ray and subsequent �r $�.. seWamerrc agreement with the County,the Oietricta M1ave received BD percent 1995-96 BUDGET HIGHLIGHTS of their investment balance of December 6, 1994,or$341 million.Since C WK December 6.Me District have made the following changes W Me Treasury BUDGET PROCESS This wa s'proposed budget was sueatnfined through sate management functions'. a one-step submittal and approval process,making it easier for each Director and each District W understand the bottarl impact of the joint operating ass. $a.. $a.. ass O Appointed the Director of Finance as the District Treasurer and cap till budget on each Districts budget before May approved the Joint $519 Wart budget, In prior years,this wee a Avostp process In which the joint $. O Created it owes Investment policy operating and capial budget recommendations were first prepared and sae O Expanded and enhanced Internal controls over cash management approved by the Joint Boards.Nan allocated W the individual District budgets for approval and steepen.This years'user friendl t budge[Is the most $ OO M25 O Appointed an outside money manager W assist in the development of comprehensive document Of it kind we have ever produced, and is designed 1.91 1992 1993 1994 1995 199e the DistYCW'lnvesurent pordello W be an important resource and planning pool. 2 3 4 MDITURES G FUND (table 1) JOINT WORKS OPERATING FUND [table 2] Figure S ALL DISTRICTS' SUMMARY BUDGET ttITN Fuss'la G 3shass TOTAL FIINdNG Uses Approved Budget 1995-96 Approved Budget $461,e1s.GaG s461.e,s.p9G 1995-96 Detail Total Comparisons by Department Ig.. m. ase�® Iv Ton' E ^9 t99495 t99S96 531et66 ttll tAitus 199M1H5 ahvini t99S96 BW9ttM �° fi6.as Pr.ieccea 4ppra,.a 9aP4mnanF 4cru.l eua9a Pr4iawa 4PPmrea enarN4 :ITS Ga...ell 878.924 1,659,900 1.662.000 1.638AQ1 n 24%1 auman Peap,wa 756.055 1,126,500 LIXM.OL 1.423.0010 25325fi $29,100.00 $32,283,e00 mance 2,483.187 2.wGuard 2,245,60 3352,300 16$3% 6pin,vnp Peca' 1JR6 vee 615800 7.684,000 almmv,w Taclmolcgy 1,146,921 1.58%300 1,289,000 1.551.603 e59% as.a.,CW a 35.258.00 39,967,000 "^a'^,a^.^u 13,435,056 15.M.® 14,4x,000 15,i2oJm I0.01%1 phtj •, Downs— Opa'aoone Ii601.211 15 .BR] 1419L.IX 24.IA.3W 52)Tb 71 - .32721 [6.000,000) 06,875,0001 Tanta Ss,,caa 140ali 14.536.200 14,700 m.000 10.1 ,Bm 130.4e%1 s�7cssoma 3'as 13.600,0000 (4,425,000) 6,anserne 490.703 379,600 494,3010 7e4.sm 106.lrw 102% SANITARY SEWER SERVICE COSTS The DieMcts' sm,leJemily property [8,800.0001 [11,300,p00I Iese J..RwENOES 13,620,1641 I3700,C4o1 13,675.000) 13.e00.000) tam: owners saniary sewer service fees average about$71 per year and are among U. 25,458,Op0 28,667,000 NET J.o,EXPENSES 45.180.264 49.542,0o0 47ugM.Cm p000 S4.3• $11% We lowest In California,which has an average rare d$184,80 according to a ep1s18tas 1994 survey Thee.fees are eel annually by each Eisb'itt and have not increased i o 59 since fiscal year 1992-93. ERVICES JOINT WORKS OPERATING FUND [table 3] In addition to Me sewer,service fee.singlefamity property owners also pay an 175,000 175,000 average of 2.8 pecent of the basic 1 percent property tax far sarary sewer 11254,000 1,250,000 Approved Budget service provided by The Ois,i The Combined All of Me property tax levy 5B4O00 58.000 Allocation to Individual Districts wuh Me sewer service fee equals appraximately$108 a year.which is also 325,000 462,900 among Me lowest for similar agencies in Southern California.All property tux 195 nc µG txE 199 Pmptl 191 193395 revenues are currently allocated to debt payments a the Certificate.of 4,886.000 6,351,400 a.. n,u. .a Inwesa guessed pl- euae•.a Participation(00i Fund a clearly indicate that Me debt service is repaid 6,960.000 7,269,5CO No. 4ct.e1 Rue(MG] rhevesca)1M61 Flmv IMG) of I= L4Mtution from pmparty axes,whereas operations and maintenance co sTa are paid by 1,4660,000 1,512,600 , 6.685m 158.281 eazfi.al 9,95% W41tm o user%es. MuldfemiN dwellings and mobile home owners pay a change per 22 oo0 235,]00 c 314,800 2 26a9949 has.41 .8,09065 32.40% ,2619.011 dwelling unit M less M Chat is somewhat en single family homeowners. 20,00 •d 4•J90N 4,209,900 3 21,127,06 1716,681 26.91040 3046% 18.564.0]] [gmmQn'cial, industrial and OM¢P major usQR[government.6Ch001a,and 2,820,000 3,095.000 5 3,343.02 (146031 3,191 3.6v% 2.007.000 nonprofit organizations)are changed per 1,000 square feet of building.while 601000 134,000 6 4.121.14 18.81 4,13o.e 47" 2.599,000 significant industrial users are also charged by volume and by the relative 14010W 513.500 7 7,150(1 has 7,418,00 8.56% 4.655.000 stren gth(of such things as heavy meals and organics)of Main wastewater. 10,000 15,000 11 5.857 CQ 131 T821 5.55540 641% 3.498,000 3,314,000 3,375,500 13 ae30, 32.29 92035 1,06% 576.00(1 WHERE THE MONEY GOES 975,000 983.203 14 2.599,27 1270.221 2.31 Be 2s9% 1,463,000 Table 1 shows Me Joint Works Operating Fund Comparative budget summary 26,417,00c 29,983p0O f549 0001 1470,000) TpTAIb ee.430.z1 w4 11pA1.6o1.4 a..saa.e,uP led btu% •54.380.0. expendibures for fiscal years 199495 and 1895-96.This able details Me 25.868.000 29.513,000 requirements far salaries,wages and benerla,and for all materials,supplies and services. Current projections for 1995-96 are Mat flows will be down by [3,875,000) [3,800,000) approumately 1,742 million gallons(a 1 percent decrease this fiscal year WHERE THE MONEY COMES FROM while expenditures will increase by an estimated$6,729,000.The major increases are in operating supplies,contractual services,repairs and $47,651,000 $54,380,000 Figure 6 shows the relative contributionsWe fiscal of War 19 revenue sources sufficient maintenance, research and monitoring,salaries and banal and training. a meet Me aal funding needs Of Me fiscal year 1995-9fi operations,espial 88,430 86,688 facilities,construction and debt service budgets.The sources of revenue are The 1995-96 Joint WerEs Operating Fund comparisons by department are Syr/� y_ .✓ram//._ ��•2(�ha� 538 628 investment interest and miscellaneous receipts,residential and industrial user provided in Table 2 for Me some done period,and Me Joint Works Budget fees, property tar revenues and reserves. Allocation m Individual 0iethdis is presented in Table 35 6 7 Courty Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California I 916�kS OUNTY $ANRATION 6STRICTS D' July 24, 1995 of ORANGE COUNTY, CAUFORNIA 109a ELUS AVENGE Pa BOX 8127 FOUWAM VALLEY.CALBOMIA SIM41P UWBB2z 11 STAFF REPORT RESERVES AND THE OCIP As a part of developing, refining and implementing the long-term financial plan, the Directors considered and revised the Districts' policies regarding cash reserves. While the current policies are included in the 1995-96 Budget, the purpose of this report is to more fully explain the various types and levels of the six-element reserve structure. Operating Reserves There are two types of reserves which are considered Operating reserves and are funded from sewer service fees. Cashflow Reserves have also been called "Dry Period Reserves." These reserves are established at a level sufficient to provide funding for the first six months' operating requirements prior to the receipt of sewer service fees which are collected as a separate line on the property tax bill. (To reduce costs and to ensure collection.) Because the first allocation of payments is received from the County Tax Collector in November/December, it is necessary to have funds on hand to meet operating expenses in the first six months of the year. (Some agencies meet this need with an annual Tax and Revenue Anticipation Note [TRAN] issue.) This Cashflow Reserve has been established at year-end at 50% of the annual operating requirements. Contingency Reserves have been established in the operating funds at a level approximately equal to 20% of the operating expense requirements. These reserves have been used to cover unanticipated and unbudgeted maintenance, repair or operational needs or emergencies. Capital Projects Reserves The "2020 VISION" Master Plan projected capital outlays for the expansion and improvement of sewage collection, treatment and disposal facilities of$2.8 billion inflated dollars through the year 2020, or approximately $93 million each year. The financial plan portion of"2020 VISION" and the ensuing Five-Year Financial Plan recommend that one-half of these improvements be paid for from borrowing, and the remaining half on a pay-as-you-go basis. In order to allow the Districts to enter the w Reserves and the OCIP Q Page 2 July 24, 1995 financing market under favorable conditions rather than to be captive to cash needs, a Capital Projects Reserve equal to one years estimated construction needs has been established. With these funds available when needed, the Districts can plan our borrowing to take advantage of low interest rates and can continue to construct needed facilities free from financial market dictates or abnormalities. Environmental Requirements The purpose of the Environmental Requirements Reserve is to accumulate sufficient funding so that the Districts could immediately begin any necessary planning, engineering, design or construction in the event the discharge permit requirements changed or other significant environmental requirements or restrictions were suddenly imposed. Because the sewer service fee is collected on the property lax bill, it could take eighteen to twenty-four months to adopt a fee and to begin to receive any proceeds, depending upon where the need and decision fell within the property tax billing cycle. Districts' Engineering staff estimates that we could reasonably expect to spend $5 to $10 million in the first eighteen months after a decision to build full secondary treatment facilities. This reserve is also available to fund any unexpected or unplanned Air Quality Management District or other new environmental protection requirements. Insurance Reserves The historical cost of sewerage facilities accumulated over the past 40 years is over $1 billion. All of these facilities can be subject to damage from fire, wind, flood and earthquake. Engineering staff has estimated that replacement cost of the treatment plant facilities could be three times the historical cost because of the higher construction standards reflecting known earthquake risks, technological advances, and environmental and cross-media protection requirements. An independent insurance and risk management consultant and staff have determined that protection from financial loss resulting from a natural disaster will require additional reserves. Each year, the Directors review the purchase of property insurance. For 1995-96, an all-risk policy was purchased for $1.3 million. This policy provides earthquake coverage of$30 million after a 5% deductible. Experts have advised that a magnitude 7.1 earthquake could result in a structural loss of approximately $200 million based on historical cost. Federal and State disaster assistance may be available after a natural disaster. Generally, this relief is on a short-term, cost reimbursement basis, up to some limit. This funding, if available, is expected to cover only a 30-day time frame and to require substantial local matching funding. v Reserves and the OCIP Page 3 July 24, 1995 Fee Stabilization Reserve The Fee Stabilization Reserve will accumulate any fund balances in excess of the requirements for the other approved reserves. If funded, these reserves would be drawn down in subsequent years to reduce sewer service fee increases. Debt Service Reserves Some of the indentures governing the various Certificate of Participation (COP) issues contain requirements for Debt Service Reserves. The purpose of these reserves is to provide some sense of comfort to investors that payments will be made in the event of some temporary cash shortage and to provide time for alternative funding. As these requirements are set by contract, and the funds are not available for any other use, Debt Service Reserves are not a part of the Districts' Reserve Policy. December Balances As of June 30, 1995, the amounts held in the various reserves were: Operating Cashfiow Reserve $ 31 Million Operating Contingency Reserve 13 Million Capital Projects Reserve 100 Million Environmental Requirements Reserve 10 Million Insurance Reserves 178 Million Fee Stabilization Reserve 0 Debt Service Reserves 21 Million Total $353 Million Variable Rate Borrowing As mentioned above, the °2020 VISION' Master Plan and the Five-Year Financial Plan specify a 50:50 mix of capital funding from borrowing and pay-as-you-go. So far, the Districts have borrowed approximately $433 million of the $750 million projected in the Master Plan. The balances outstanding as of June 30, 1995 were: Reserves and the OCIP Page 4 July 24, 1995 Series "A" Variable Rate $ 94,300,000 Series "B" Fixed Rate 24,505,000 Series "C" Variable Rate 95,600,000 1992 Refund, Variable Swap to Fixed 150,105,000 1993 Refund, Variable Swap to Fixed 45.700.000 Total $410,210,000 The Series "A" and Series "C" issues are both variable rate COPS. This means the interest paid by the Districts changes as rates change in the economy. Almost half of the Districts' debt is variable rate debt. (The two refundings which are matched with long-term SWAPS are considered fixed rate debt.) This 50% variable rate mix is well above the 10%-25% mix usually allowed by the rating agencies. A major reason for this variance is the total reserve level at the Districts. Since the reserves are invested in short-term instruments whose interest rates will move in the same direction as the debt, the Districts are considered fully "hedged" against the interest rate risk associated with variable rate debt. This is prudent financial management, policy and practice. Property Taxes Prior to 1978, the Districts levied a separate property tax for operations and maintenance, capital improvements and debt service. Ad valorem property taxes were an approved part of our Revenue Program required by the Clean Water Act. In the period between Proposition 13 and 1990, property taxes were used in the Operating Funds to pay for operations and maintenance and for COP service in Districts 1, 2 and 3. With the adoption of the "2020 VISION" Master Plan and the Five-Year Financial Plan, the Districts embarked on a long-term borrowing program utilizing Certificates of Participation. Consequently, Resolution 92-47 and others were adopted dedicating ad valorem property taxes first to debt service. Because nearly all of the Districts' property taxes are used for debt service, the State's confiscation of property taxes since 1992-93 has been limited to approximately $3.5 million each year. District 13 received no property taxes as a result of formation negotiations with the County. District 14 is fully financed by the Irvine Ranch Water District. Sewer Service Fees The Clean Water Act requires all agencies that received Clean Water Grant Funds to have an approved Revenue Program. The Districts' Revenue Program was approved in 1979. One requirement of an approved program is that users pay their fair share. Reserves and the OCIP Page 5 July24, 1995 Between 1981 and 1990, each of the then Districts adopted sewer service fees to meet operating requirements. These fees are authorized in the California Government and Health and Safety Codes, and must be adopted through the Ordinance process. Fees were last changed for the 1992-93 fiscal year subsequent to the State's properly tax confiscation. The annual sewer service fee for 1995-96 for a single-family dwelling in each District is: District Annual Fee 1 $ 83.24 2 71.52 3 73.89 5 96.75 6 76.47 7 50.09 11 60.00 13 100.00 14 Funded by IRWD Fees can be set only at a level that is sufficient to cover the "cost of service." Clearly these costs would include operating and maintaining the plants and the collection system, and the costs to repay debt. Whether the cost of service includes the costs to build reserves in accordance with the policy and need of the Districts is untested at this time. Orange County Bankruptcy The failure of the Orange County Investment Pool has left the Districts with $92,639,489 of"Settlement Secured Claims" and "Repayment Claims," in place of the cash that had been on deposit. Various alternatives have been discussed or considered relative to the likelihood or method of the Districts receiving this "final 20¢." Forgiveness Some State Legislators and even some local cities are proposing that the Repayment Claims be forgiven, that the County should not have to repay these amounts, as it has no cash. The Districts' total Repayment Claims are $48,456,792. Reserves and the OCIP Page 6 July 24, 1995 Landfills The County has proposed to sell their landfills to raise the funds. The County Sanitation District Act allows the Districts to own or operate landfills. Our proposal is for us to buy the landfills with our Settlement and Recovery Claims and perhaps some cash. A fair price and resolution of future environmental liability issues would need to be established. Another area of concern is differing service areas for sewage service and for landfill service, and local representation on the Board of Directors. Local Sewers It may be possible to provide financial relief to other local agencies and cities if the Districts assumed responsibility for maintenance of local sewers. If this service is a cost center for cities and if the Districts can reduce the cost, such a charge could result in an overall fee decrease for the user community. Flood Control Storm water run-off through the flood control system or"non-point source" discharges finds its way to the same ocean that we protect and monitor. If responsibility for flood control, local sewers, landfills and regional sewage treatment and disposal was assigned to one agency, then that agency would truely be responsible for watershed management. If it is sensible, efficient, and cost-effective to combine these functions, the Sanitation Districts would be the logical choice as lead agency as we have the most complex operating system and experience. Property Tax Division/Confiscation The State has confiscated local property taxes in the past. Some have proposed that local agency taxes be used to fund County needs. The Districts could lose over$31 million per year in this scenario. Past property lax diversions have excluded those taxes used for debt service. As all of the Districts' debt service is for capital improvements and almost all of the property taxes are applied to debt service in accordance with District Resolutions, continuation of this exclusion would be beneficial and very important to the Districts. Loss of the property taxes would require an increase in service fees to make COP payments and to comply with revenue coverage requirements of the borrowing contracts. Reserves and the OCIP Page 7 July 24, 1995 Accumulated Reserve Loss Some elected officials have been reported as seeking to obtain, raid or steal the accumulated reserves of special districts and to give them to the County. As explained earlier in this report, all of the Districts' reserves have been appropriated for special purposes and are used as a 'hedge" for interest rate risk of the borrowing program. It would not be prudent or wise financial management to have variable rate borrowing which was not matched by investments or reserves. Any further reduction of reserves must be accompanied by a corresponding reduction in variable rate debt. This means that the reserves should first be used to retire debt. The Orange County bankruptcy and the failure of the Orange County Investment Pool can provide a new way to conduct business. Many options must be considered including reorganizations, dissolutions, consolidations and joint powers authorities or agreements. The Sanitation Districts are committed to a proactive approach and to being a part of the solution. GGS:lc ,:� .� W JOINT CHAIRMAN'S REPORT JULY 26, 1995 1) The first of two scheduled tours on the Enchanter was held on July 13, and those directors that went found it very interesting and worthwhile. (Director Sheldon Singer may have a comment.) The second trip is scheduled for July 28. The boat can only handle 3 to 4 guests at a time and we can schedule additional tours in August if any of the directors are interested. If you would like to go on a future boat trip, please call Jean Tappan in the General Manager's office. 2) Tour of Plant No. 2 As of today, four directors have signed up for dinner and tour of Plant 2 on August 2, in place of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services I Committee. Please contact Ed Hodges tonight if you plan to attend in order to get a count for the dinner. 2) Upcoming Meetings A. The Operations. Maintenance and Technical Services Committee is not scheduled to meet in August. The next meeting will be September 6th at 5:30 p.m. B. The Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization Study for Administrative Employees is scheduled to meet Wednesday. August 2nd after the tour of Plant 2. C. The Planning. Design and Construction Committee is not scheduled to meet on in August. The next meeting will be Thursday. September 7th. 1995 at 5:30 p.m. 2 D. The Finance Administration and Human Resources Committee is not scheduled to meet in August. The next meeting will be on Wednesday September 13th. at 5:30 p.m. 3) AMSA GOLD AWARD I am proud to announce that the Districts once again are the recipient of an AMSA Gold Award. This award recognizes the Districts' complete and consistent National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Compliance. In 1995, 132 AMSA member facilities qualified for Gold Awards and 87 qualified for Silver Awards. These numbers reflect the level of excellence in environmental protection that all AMSA members strive for. 3 n 4) REINVENTING THE SANITATION DISTRICTS--DAY ONE Ted Gaebler (Gaybler), the co-author of Reinventing Government, will be at the Districts all day Wednesday, August 23rd, meeting with the executive management team, supervisory staff, the Steering Committee and addressing the Directors at the Joint Boards meeting. 5) Directors who attended one of the orientations and plant tours in June were given a booklet prepared by staff called "An Introduction to Wastewater Treatment at CSDOC" (what Don calls "The Primer"). All directors who did not attend and do not yet have a copy can pick one up after the meeting. 4 � M MEETING DATE July 29, 1995 TUql 7:30 p.m. DISTRICTS: 1,2,3,5,6,7,11,13 a 14 DISTRICT? S- g u-I JOINT BOARDS IMORENOI..........• MC OUIDAN ........ (BOWMAN) ........... AGE ............. IPER ........... FERRYMAN ........ MASTWOBI........... BROWN ........... — ICOONT21 ........... WRRIY .......... ISCOTT) ............. COLLWS ......... — IPOTTS) ............ SALTAREW ........ WEBAYI ............. COK ............. — ISTEwEN ........... **M ......... IMM ............... OEBAY ........... — WEW ............... DENES ........... — DISTRIGT3 3= S W-- ' mAUDO ............ DETTW F ......... — IPARKER) ............ DUNLAP .. ........ — ISCOTTI ............ iSYSN. .......... IDOWNE/7............ ECKENRODE ....... — IGUU MONI ......... WELCH ........... IPEMYI ............. FERRYMAN ........ — IBEW.............. DENIES ............ IANDEASONI .......... FLORA ........... — IPARXERI ........... DUNLAP........... INARSHAW .......... CMI ........... —_ IDOWNEY I .......... EC ROM ........ (WELCH) ............. OUWKSWi ........ � IANDERBONI ......... FLORA ............ WARD) ............. HAMMOND ........ (MONEROI........... MCOUIOAN ........ IBAUEM ............. LEIMIG .. ......... ICOONTLI ........... WRMW .......... (MWER) ............. URN . ............ MORBYI ............ SA . ............. IMORENOI ............ MC GUWAN........ _ ¢IAKETI............ Swam ........... (COONTZI ............ MURPHY . ......... ISTEMEM ........... SitliGM ......... WUNLAM ............ PARKER.. . ........ IDALY) ............. ZEMEL ............ IEPPERSONI........... RICE ..... ........ _ n (NORBY) SA .............. DISMICT3 S- O U� � IMTTSI . ... .. ...... SALTAREW........ _ _ IDOTSONI .......... . SAPIEN ......... ww [DOTSONI ............ SAPIEA ........... PARKEM ......... .. ¢ W .. SwamIBOWMANI .......... AGE .. ST ............ ........... STANTON ......... (HASTINGS).......... ORO" ......... ISTANTONI ........... SUMER .......... ISCOTA .. ......... 00w%RS ........ (MILLEN ............. SWAN............ IANDERSOIS ......... FLORA ............ MAHLSTROMI ........ SYLVM ........... IMARSHAW .. ....... ORIFTW ........... (OULLMSMQ .......... WELCH ........... — —— — IDAUER) ............ LEIMM ........... WALY) .............. 2EMEL ........... _ MINEW ............ URN ............. JAL IEPPERSONI.......... RU:E .............. OTH�EI ... STAFF WORM ............ SA ANDERSON . WOODRUFF RLAKETI............ swam ........... HASENSTAB DEMUR...... ISTEMEM ........... MRRIDR ......... "MGM ... mow .....� IWAHMTROW ....... MWA ........... JONK ..... LEE........ IDALY) ............. ZEMEL ............ KYLE ..... LNDSTROM.. /� UNDER .... NIKON...... DISTRICTS rl Z 3 [. MCwT .. $HAW...... (COXI ... .......... DESAY............ fi_ MOIELLY .. STONE ... (STANTOM .......... STEWER........... OOTEN .... .......... � IDMAY) ............ COX ............. STREED ... .......... TA IN S .... ...SC fJ I TORRM ... — •••• ••— KHSTMCTS 17 ............ FERRYMAN........: R vw ... .......... lCoxi SOR ISTANTOM ........A.E. SUMER.......... .... .. • . DMTRIT S- l w� :L — (WAND) ............ HAMNIOND......... _ IP07731 ............ SALTAAEW........ (COX) .............. DEBAY............ IPERRYI ............ FERRYMAN......... IM0REN01 ........... MWUMAN ........ ICOONR) ........... WRMW .......... — ISTANTONI .......... SUMER........... :SAUEDISTRICT„ ..= a M :: = RI ............ LEIPl ...... ISAUERI .......... DLTTLOR ....... ISTEINEM ...........fiAMITSM ....... DISTRICT,3 S= 3 IJ IWELCHI ............ GUILIXlMI ...... _ IDALYI .. .......... ZEMEL ............ _ ICOONT2I ........... MURPHY .......... (DUNIAR ......... PARKER ........... (STANTON) .......... $TETHER........... DISTRICT 14 $ = y W t I IPOTTSI ............ SALTAREW (COONTZI ........... NRMHV ........ 'L[L� IWARDI ............ HAMMOND......... _ ISTANTON) .......... SUMER.......... DU02 IMILLERI ............ SWAN ............ 0712E195 f MEETING DATE: July 26, 1995 TM, 7:30 p.m. DISTRICTS) 1,2,3,5,6,7,11,13 a 14" DISTRICT 1 JOINT ROARM A IMORENO)........... SIII WNIW ........ 4/ WWWNI ........... AGE ............. . IMRRYI ............ FERRYMAN ........ IHASTINUSI........... BROWN ........... ICOONRI ........... NMMM .......... ISWTTI ............. M!!aE!'.......... _ IPoTTeI ............ SALTARRU ........ T (N:BrTY) ............. LOX ............. .JL ISTEWEp ........... SOMMI 1 ......... 7 (CO)0 ............... GES,Y ........... . (BEW ............... GENES ........... _ UMUEM ............. DETTToiw ......... _ DISTRICT 2 (PARKEA) ............ WNLAP ........ _ ISLOTR .............MlbIR ........•• y/ mOWMEYI............ ELKENRODE ....r.. JG _ IGULLLYSW) ......... WELCH ......... j/ IPERRYI ............. FERRYMAN ........ �v _ IBEW .............. GENES ............ f IANOERSONI .......... FLORA ......... _ IDOWNEY) .......... EOMCMNRODE •••..... fml. ............. OUWXIIN ........ _ IANDERSOW ......... MORA ............ - WAND) ............. NAMMOND ........ — IMORENOI....•.••r.. NCOUMAN ....... (SAUERI ............. MIMIG ........... _� — ILOONRI ........... MURRIY .......... o (MWERI ............. MNN ............. J I WORM ............ SA ............ IMOREN01............ ML GUXMN........ •/gam _ RLAKER.•..••..•... "am ......... (COO I ............ MURPW ......•••• .lL (MINERS ........... AliU1FW ......... WUN"PI ............ PARKER........... fS_ WALYI ............. ZEMEL ............ (EMRSONI........... RICE ............. _V (NORSV) ............. SA .............. mot/ — DISTRICT I (MMI ............. SALTAREW........ _� — WOTSWI ............ BAPIEN ........... — (PARKERI ......... wNi.A ........... JL — . — IPAgIVI ........... AGE ............. QLAKET)............. SINGER ........... ,JG _ ISOWMAN) ....••.... AGE ............. BL [STANTON) ........... ST INER .......... — 000771ON.......•.. B110WN ........... t/. ISTANT . ........... SWAN. .......... I/C0T11 ............./WMM. .......... JL IMILLESTROSQ......... SWAN............ SYLVIA (MARSHONI ..•...•.. FLORA ............ _1// (WAHLBBONIA ........ WLDH ........... (MARSHAW ......... DRSFN ........... .✓ (DaYl .............. WELCN ........... = (BAUER) ............ IINN . ........... WALYI .............. 7EMEL ......... _ IMINER)MEN ............ LWN ............. IEPPEgSONI.......... RICE ...........•• � STAFF OTHER6 INORIY) ............ SA .............. I ANDERSON . j. WOODRIIW LAK ..� RER............ SWDER ........... . HASENSTAB DEMIR. . .... — ISTEINER) ... ..... �IBA1(i111 ....... HODOES ... KNOPF . . ... IWAHWTRONO ....... SYLVIA ......... UONK .... LEE ........ IDALY) ...... .•..•.: ZEWL ............ KYIE ..... LWDSTRDM LWDER .... NIXON......_ DISTRICT6 MCINTYRE a, SSHAW...... ICOXI .............. "MY............ MC EEO&Y TONE ..... � ISTANTONI .......... BTEWFR........ N ... JG BTgEED •••••••• IDEBAYI ............ COX ............. ..........� T .. ........ DISTRICTS TORUS .. ..........� IPERRN ............ FERRYMAN......... J� VINUNT . . . ..........� WWSOR . . . ..........� ISTANTOS .......... DESAY............ 1 a# ISTANTONI .......... STEWER........... 0 .�.w �../.�.,yE �.�,� DISTRICT /Y- - 4Az4d M'ARS1 ............ NAMMOND......... JL Vj yj; MARDI SALTAREW ........ J(fTM': ICOXI .............. OEBRY ......... A,A� - RRYI ............ FFARYWN......... IMORE(M NO)...........NT7 MC ........ (COO1 ........... J STENERRIW . .. ISTANTONI .......... /IEWEq........... y DISTRICT 11 ISAUERI ............ LEIPEID ........... ISAUERI ............ DETLOFF ......... ��/ DISTRICT 11 IWELLHI . OULLOISO)I ........ ✓ IDALY) ............. ZEMEL ............ JG ICODNTZ) ........... MURPHY ....... ... JG — IDUNIAPI ........... PARKER ........ . .. g/ ISTANTONI .......... STEINER........ . . . . DISTRICT 14 IPoTT61 ............ SALTAREW ........ yL — ILOONTZ) ........... WRIW ........... WARD) ............ HAMMOND......... . — ISTANTONI ........ STEWER....... ..•• IMILLEPo ............ MAN ........ DLp2 — OT/PGISS PUBLIC SIGN-IN SHEET COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY JuIy 26 , 1995 BOARD MEETING NAME ORGANIZATION FIRM Please Print Please Print �7uf o 11 07/26/95 -JOINT BOARD MEETING #2 - Roll Call PK: We have a quorum present in each district, Mr. Chair, however we do need to appoint a chair pro tem for District 2. JC: District 2, OK, I can do that, right. Barry? You're it. All right, thanks. #3 - Relating to a000intment of Directors JC: I do have a supplemental agenda for District 3, recognizing active Director George Brown and alternate Director Marilyn Hastings, we'll need a motion for approve. All right, consider that unanimous. I do not have any requests for public comments, so seeing none, we'll move on to item No. 4. Before I start into a report here, I'd like to recognize Sheldon Singer who would like to make a few comments before the Board. SINGER: (inaudible) #6 - reports JC: Thank you, Sheldon. That leads me into my comment is the second trip on the Enchanter is scheduled for July 28, so those of you who haven's signed up may do so. The boat—to clarify Sheldon's comment apparently can only handle 3 or 4 guests at a time so if we get more than that, we'll schedule additional trips/tours in August if you have an interest in doing so. If you're interested call Jean Tappan in the General Manager's office and sign up with her. Tour of Plant No. 2—As you may recall, there is a tour scheduled for next Wednesday, starting from here at 5:30 with a light dinner and then bus to the plant No. 2 for a tour. Only four directors have signed up at this point in time so that if any of you do wish to go on that tour please contact Ed Hodges and let him know, tonight preferably. Three more have signed up, so we're at seven, great. I encourage you to do that as I have in the past because these tours are very informative as Sheldon just learned. Upcoming meetings: Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee- not scheduled to meet in August; will meet Wednesday, September 6, 1995, 5:30 p.m. Ad Hoc Committee on Space Utilization for Administrative Employees -Wednesday, August 2, after the Plant Tour Planning, Design and Construction Committee-will not meet in August; will meet Thursday, September 7, 5:30 p.m Finance, Administrative and Human Resources Committee -will not meet in August; will meet Wednesday, September 13, 5:30 p.m. 1 We received another award which I'm proud to announce that the District once again is the recipient of the AMSA gold award. This award recognizes the Districts complete and consistent national pollutant discharge elimination system permit compliance. In 1995, 132 AMSA member facilities qualified for gold awards and 87 qualified for silver awards. These numbers reflect the level of excellence and environmental protection that all AMSA members strive for. Re-inventing the Sanitation Districts, Day 1. Ted Grabler, the co-author of Reinventing Government, will be at the Districts all day, Wednesday, August 23, meeting with the executive management teams, supervisory staff, and the steering committee and addressing the Directors at the joint board meeting that night on his insights into re-inventing government. The Directors who attended one of the orientation plant tours in June were given a booklet prepared by staff called An Introduction to Wastewater, sometimes it's referred to as the primer. All the directors who did not attend and did not get a copy you're welcome to get one. It looks like this and Penny has them up here at the desk so afterwards I'd encourage you to pick this up if you don't have one because it gives you a very simple, 15 page oversight as to what this organization is all about. With that Don you're next. DFM: Mr. Chair, some items that were in your packet. One is an executive budget summary that looks like this, it's a foldout, it was not designed primarily for your use because you have the whole budget. It was really designed for the entire staff. I've had four sessions with four departments on the budget, talking to all employees about the budget, about my concern, about bench marking, and about their roll in helping to achieve the objectives of bench marking, and to talk about training, our overall commitment to making a good organization better. I've got three more sessions scheduled in the next few weeks. Secondly, there is this report on the reserves and the OCIP which was requested at the executive committee meeting. We didn't have a chance to get it in the agenda, but it is in your booklet and is something you may want to review in connection with the item No. 13 on the agenda tonight. Finally, we got a fax today from the Register, and this is the form of a heads-up, it says we are surveying board members of all non-school agencies that have repayment claims coming under option A of the settlement agreement, and the question is: Do you favor forgiveness of your agencies repayment claim against the County, Yes or No? So if you haven't gotten one of these at City Hall, or at your home or business, you probably will. I would like to recognize George Scott, he came stumbling in the door with crutches under his arms— good to see you George. One other comment, just so I don't forget and lose somebody, I did want to announce that tonight we will be adjourning the meeting in honor of Burnie Dunlap's wife. She died of cancer this week. Burnie's been through a really tough time and its been a shame, and we wanted to do that in her honor. Tom? TLW: Just briefly. There's been a lot of things going on that you're going to hear about later in the meeting, bankruptcy update, etc. The only item I'd bring up now just briefly for those who have been here for more than a few months, a couple, three years ago we were engaged in a huge environmental lawsuit, the United States vs. Montrose Chemical and all the cities and participants. That case was resolved a little over a year ago. We effected a settlement that involved all of the districts and all of the cities as well as above 150 entities in Los Angeles County, another 30 or so in San Bernardino 2 and Ventura County. The decision by the District Court Judge Houck was taken on appeal by the corporate defendants and the Court of Appeal 9th Circuit reversed his decision, which approved our settlement agreement, saying that he hadn't really done his homework and read the record and therefore he ought to go back and read it. We have been responding to that in meetings, very intensive meetings, with the Justice Dept. lawyers over the last month or so and we are striking and have come to pretty close agreement on a new consent agreement. The most important point for each is that they are not asking for another dime. We're basically re-working the agreement— there is going to be a reallocation between the federal agencies as to who gets the proceeds so it's still looming out there, but it's not envisioned that it will have any cost effect on your cities or this district more particularly. This should be resolved but there may be periodic news reports on it and I wanted to make sure that you were aware of it. ECKENRODE: (inaudible) TLW: No it's not on the agenda but I'd be glad to do so. Well I'm no sure that anybody knows that. For those curious about that, there is a House of Representative bill that was actually authored by freshman congressman Brian Billbray, who is from San Diego and what it provided for was basically a flat-out exemption for San Diego. Their singular treatment plant is at Point Loma, they have an operation very similar to ours with advanced primary treatment. Their outfall is very similar to ours, it's not as long—it's four miles instead of five, it's a little deeper, it's 300 instead of 200. They have been pushing for this together with another bill that was passed last year which allowed them to file for a 301(h)waiver much like we have. That bill was signed into law and a waiver application has been filed. They got a tentative and they expect the formal tentative ruling, which probably will be approval, in about 2 weeks. The legislation was put on the Speaker's corrections day agendas, item No. 1 two days ago. The purpose was to particularly highlight the ridiculous federal laws that continue to exist and you probably saw in the paper it passed by well over 100 votes, I forgot the count but it was like 268 to 137 or in that neighborhood. It will probably face some tough slugging in the Senate as its impact on us: it probably would have some favorable impact but there is a line of thought, Blake is really up to speed on this, there is a thought that it could also have kind of a reverse effect, but probably it will stand alone. BPA: There certainly is some concern about there being some backlash that would be a result of that bill which is in the House now only. One of the interesting effects of this is this thing is known down in the San Diego area now for a couple of months that Gingrich was going to put this number 1 on his list. At the same time that the City was applying for a waiver similar to ours, and up to a few months ago, EPA was strenuously opposed to a waiver down in San Diego and much of the environmental community as well. However, faced with the alternative of just an outright walk by San Diego on it, they've changed their tune. The regulatory and environmental communities are far more favorably inclined to look at a waiver application. I think that has direct impact on us. Our application on August 28th will be six years since we applied for an extension to our existing permit so we've been operating under the provisions of a 301(h) waiver since 1985. That's the good news. We've got 11 years out of one, five-year permit due wholly in part to EPA's intention to moving forward on our application, but with--in effect 3 it's an extension of the concept of less than full secondary treatment. We continue to do the monitoring program, Sheldon mentioned some of the activities that he saw out on the Enchanter. We think it's important that we continue, through our monitoring program, in the measurements of our effluent from our treatment plan, that we can demonstrate that we're not impacting the environment. That seems to us to be a good middle ground is to gel the special permission for a waiver but to along the way prove that we continue to protect the environment. That's the strategy that we've used consistently since the mid-80's, it's the strategy that landed us the first large waiver in the country, and its the strategy that keeps us in favor with EPA, State of California, and the environmental community. We basically do not have people on us regarding our waiver and that includes people like the Surfrider foundation that has a particular interest in the quality of ocean waters off Orange County. TLW: Just as an example, as Blake said, our application is six years old. San Diego filed theirs on April 27 and they got preliminary approval which doesn't have any legal significance, on June 12, 45 days later, our was six years, and they are scheduled to get their tentative approval, which does have legal significance, on August 14. What can I say? DFM: One distinction I think is that the Congressional approach was a permanent waiver; the EPA staff approval is a five year waiver like ours, if they get it, and we presume that they will. JC: Any other questions, let move on to item No. 7 #7 - Election of Joint Chair JC: As you know, I was nominated at the last meeting, we carried these over to the second meeting, leaving nominations open. Are there any further nominations? Thank you, I appreciate that. Item B—Oh, move nominations be closed, I think—I go along with that--do you want to make a motion and be unanimous, somebody? There is nobody else, what are you going to do? Again, thank you for your recognition and support. #B- Nomination for Vice Joint Chair : Nominate Dan Welch. JC: Any other nominations? Nomination for Sal Sapien. Nominate Peer Swan. Any other nominations? Motion to closed nominations? TLW: The Board secretary does have ballots. I would point out to you, that under the provisions of the Brown Act, secret ballots are not permissible. What we have done in the past, which in my opinion is valid, is we can use, we don't have an electronic tote board voting, each district has the opportunity to caucus, each district gels to cast a single vote, so there will be 9 votes cast, that will require 5 votes for election. The votes from each member in the district can be by written ballot but they will have to be signed and then they are available for review. 4 SAPIEN: (inaudible; declined nomination, expressed concern re Peer Swan) JC: But you are withdrawing your nomination. So we have two nominations, Peer Swan and Dan Welch. With that, Penny will you pass out the ballots. TLW: By district, that's correct. The Board Secretary is going to give the envelope to each district chair. There are an equal number of ballots in there as to the number of districts, so each individual will have a ballot, but it will be—you must sign your ballot, and if you have an illegible signature, please print it. JC: I'd like to give both candidates to make a comment, and especially Peer in rebuttal to the speech that was made about him. Peer? SWAN: If I could get your attention? (voting commences) JC: If I can have your attention, the suspense and surprise is over. Peer Swan was elected 9-0. SWAN: I will make a very short and brief—I want to thank all the people that stuck with me, I know that we've done a lot of things that have caused some people problems. Sal, I've arranged that at the end of this year I'm stepping down from the IRWD Chairmanship so next year, at this time, I'll will not be the Chair there. I would like to think that most of you remember the fact that we pioneered variable rate debt here, we saved by doing that, saved this district probably 10 to 60 or 70 million dollars in debt financing. In fact, some of it has paid for itself and is no net cost to the District and a lot of good things. I am very dedicated to change, I'm an impatient person, I'm probably the most—I realize I'm a controversial person because of it but I really and truly appreciate the support I had tonight, it was a difficult decision, and I bear no ill will to my good friend in Yorba Linda who I consider a good friend. #8 - Minutes JC: If there are no corrections or amendments I'll deem them approved. Seeing none, move then to item 9. #9 - Ratification of Claims JC: For a roll call vote ratifying payment of claims. Penny? PK: Motion carries Mr. Chair #10a-f(Consent Calendars JC: Any director have one they would like pulled? 5 DEBAY: (inaudible) JC: Ok, 10E. Any others, do we have a motion for approval except 10E? Motion, second, any opposition, consider that unanimous. 10E, Jan? DEBAY: (inaudible) LINDER: ..we expected to start.. and we added a little bit of time-looking at it a second time and during this period...supposed to work...good possibility we'll shut down partially for the holidays which necessarily is going to have that much in the previous time frame. We want to allow if we have to shut down for any reason during that period. We don't expect to take that long, we certainly hope that it won't take that long..if we can get the contractor to do some boring under Superior we may not have to shut down. Normally that was going to be an open cut. If we can do that, we can cut the time and get done earlier. DEBAY: (inaudible) JDL: That's something that we will talk with Don Webb and traffic engineering and Mark Sanicorian and we'll address that. Maybe if it takes a separate detour or we can segregate that sidewalk onto PCH. We'll take a look at that. JC: Want to move the item? Any opposition? Consider that unanimous. #12a - Minutes of the Executive Committee JC: Motion on Item 12A which deals with the minutes of the Executive Committee 1-6? Yes, excuse me John. Okay. GULLIXSON: (inaudible) JC: So we have a motion for 1-6 with the amendments on 6 as requested. Any discussion or question, consider that unanimous. #12b JC: What I'll do here is--item 12B1,2, which has to do with the operations committee, 3, 4, which is Planning Committee, 5, 6, 7, which is the Finance Committee. Is there any item in this group that you'd like to have a discussion on. Yes Mark. MURPHY: Question on one (inaudible) JC: Bob, do you want to answer that? DFM: Was there any other competition is what I think you're asking, isn't it Mark? OOTEN: (inaudible) 6 JC: ..On 1? Ok. Any other questions about these Items, 12b1-7? Yes, John. GULLIXSON: (Inaudible) JC: We have a motion 12b1-7, recognizing that Mark Murphy is abstaining on#3 and Steiner is abstaining on B1. Any opposition? Consider that unanimous. #12b8 - re Consolidation of the Districts JC: This has to do with a consideration relative to the Districts activities on consolidation of districts and I think as most of you know the executive committee has been reviewing this subject for 8 or 9 months now, and what we have is a presentation to give you all an overview as to what this is. John do you want to speak before or after? Go ahead. GULLIXSON: (inaudible) SWAN: I think at the Executive Board meeting what we asked from District 14's point of view is that we operate somewhat differently. I think staff has a presentation that shows that IRWD joined District 14 and agreed that the district, instead of having each homeowner in the district pay a fee to the district, the district writes a check to the Sanitation District-operates its own treatment plant and treats substantially 80% of its wastewater in its own treatment plant. Having a uniform bill that charges CSDOC over to the district in addition to paying for our operating, the wastewater treatment plant at Michelson which really does 80% of the treatment didn't appear fair. The district also has diminimus debt outstanding on District 14 essentially IRWD has written a check for all the capital projects whereas the remaining districts have debt financed the projects for the last five years. Therefore, the proposal that we saw was doing a pro rate share of the debt onto everyone and the user fee and that way people in the district would be assessed twice instead of once and what we wanted to get before we agreed to the consolidation—and I'm an advocate of consolidation—is to have an agreement reached between the districts and district 14 to look at the inequities of this arrangement and have that addressed and then go ahead with consolidation and the suggestion that I would have would be that we—if it is a direction of the rest of the districts--and I think district 14 is the only one that has a significant issue like this, if that is their pleasure to go ahead with the consolidation, address the district 14 issues, and then consolidate district 14 and we can catch up in the LAFCO process. That would be an alternative suggestion. JC: Just to be clean because all of you should be comfortable with this and John's Point is that if we're not all comfortable, we should move more slowly. The only thing, for your information on the agenda tonight is to approve in concept this consolidation process. One of the reasons is that staff has to go through a filing with the LAFCO and it probably is going to take 30-60 days to get that filing even put together from a staff standpoint and after that I don't know how long it takes to process it through LAFCO, but it could be a while. So our view was that if we generally believe that this is the thing to do, then that's a piece of the puzzle that needs to be in process. It doesn't mean we've made a final commitment. If it sounds, John, like we're promoting it, and where 7 we pull the plug and create a problem for ourselves, then I think all the directors should be cognizant of that. I had always viewed this as just part of the process and we may pull the plug for a variety of reasons, but this has been something that most of the directors I believe have been very supportive of. So that's the context of the approach tonight. We wanted to have Blake give you a background of this thing so we make sure you understand it as best as possible. Bill, you had a question? STEINER: (inaudible) SALTARELLI: (inaudible) JC: I don't want to create an argument about this thing because we all need to be comfortable with it, I keep repeating. Staff believes that it needs to do some work. We brought this to you time and time again to make sure this is something that you want to move forward with and staffs position on this is that they will not take the application to LAFCO until we see it one more time or we see it, actually, I shouldn't say one more time. But should they even embark on preparing one. John? GULLIXSON: (inaudible) DFM: The staff is not trying to rush this thing at all. We're trying to be responsive to some concerns we've heard expressed by Board members. Actually we started negotiations to update a 10 year old contract with IRWD, District 14, a couple of months ago. And I suspect staff is going to get together on the terms of that agreement more quickly than you all may when it gets before you, frankly, because I think there are some money issues there that you may want to think about. So think within a month we will have, at the staff level, the negotiation will be complete, and I think the staffs will be satisfied. Whether you all are satisfied remains to be seen, but I think it would be helpful to hear Blake's presentation so you get a flavor of the issues that are before the staff and will be before you eventually, he's prepared to do that and I think it will be time well spent. GULLIXSON: DFM: To the barest minimum, we would not be recommending lowering anything, we would be recommending that they all come up to the highest district eventually. JC: Let's hear the presentation, is that all right Sheldon, and then lets ask questions and we'll have a better flavor of what's going on. Blake, you're on. BPA: ..the issue that we're talking about is governance by one body, not nine as we have right now. The existing situation is for the 9 boards there is a total of 59 seats and right now 39 members as a result of the downsizing that we undertook late last year. Assuming that we have one district and one seat per agency, we would have 25 seats in 25 members of the board. So that's what it would look like assuming one sanitation district. Within the staff report there are discussions of administrative, financial, and legal savings that's about $144,0001 guess you can decide for yourself if that's a significant number or not but that's our best estimate of what the consolidation would save us in annual costs of doing business. As has already been pointed out, revenues 8 and expenditures would be thrown basically into one operations pot and one capital pot with the clear implication that some districts will gain by that, and some districts will lose by that and I've got a graph to illustrate that, district by district. We have flat connection fees across all agencies so that would remain the same, it's $2350 per domestic connection. Property taxes and user fees: we would propose that for right now it would remain as is and there is some equity issues relating to that, but with the uncertainty about what's happening with property taxes with the action that this board is already taking with respect user fees, which is to remain at status quo and the fact that our window of opportunity for adjusting user fees and getting them on the property tax bill as the method of collection is basically closing in on us because we basically at this point are at a point of no return. We'll have to wait until next budget year around March or April to really make the decision to increase user fees and then get those on to the property tax bills of next year. Finally there are some significant issues related to the IRWD District 14 issues and I can also get into that and that may represent at least on one side of the spectrum the kind of equity issues that are echoed to maybe a much smaller degree with the rest of the districts. One of the questions that was raised is: should we remain as a sanitation district or should we look at some of the other opportunities within state law; Tom did an analysis of that which is in your agenda packages and Tom if you could take a moment on this. TLW: I'll be very brief. The report that was included in the package, we did a synopsis trying to give you 4 or 5 lines about each of the alternative forms of governance out there. Any one of these could be created or converted to run a wastewater district, but I would note that each one of those, except the sanitation district, comes with some other downsides, and in my opinion the downsides outweigh the upsides. Some of those are sanitary districts under the 23 Act, or the County and California Water Districts. They have some very broad, liberal provisions, you don't have to go to bid on public works contracts, but that's a very basic process. Our contracts are so huge that I don't think you'd find staff, you wouldn't find my office recommending in favor of that in any event. I don't think the boards would support it, so it's kind of a moot issue. Joint Powers Agreement doesn't provide necessarily for all of the authorities you would need to effect all the transaction that we do. County Service Areas could be done but they just wouldn't allow us to do it. The bottom line is: Sanitation Districts, when they first created this Act 50-odd years ago, was quite visionary was probably well before the term regionalization or regional government or large combined government was even a buzz word. I strongly suggest that we not change the form of government. I don't know of any real negative downsides in the Act that unduly restrict these operations. We've got virtually 50 years of experience with it, it's really not gotten in our way and it's just a good vehicle. If anybody has any questions or suggestions, we have representatives in the room tonight from the California Water District and from Sanitary Districts out here, so we have our members...sanitary districts, but I think the only way to go—the only other alternative would be to create at the bottom by special action of the legislature that's basically creating your own charter and you write your own rules for operation but that's a time-consuming, legislative process. I would suggest to you its a minimum of one legislative session and that's going to open up a lot of tough issues to resolve that aren't going to gain you anything unique that's not available in the Sanitation District. 9 BPA: One clear advantage of the Sanitation District is they can operate landfills, so that of course is an issue that has been under hot discussion more lately than ever before. ...District 14 and some of its unique situation before I get into the graphs that show the individual districts...First the board is represented by IRWD, County, Irvine, Orange and Tustin, and formed in 1985, District 14 purchased and owns 15 million gallons worth of capacity in the treatment plant, flat out 10 year ownership of it. In fact that's ongoing unless there is a change in that formula. IRWD is unique in that they are billed directly for the operating, maintenance and capital costs related to the facilities, and they in turn end up billing their customers. IRWD is the only agency within the family that owns and operates their own sewage treatment plants that's a major source of reclaimed water in their area and by virtue of that, there some major swings in their summer and wintertime flows. The wintertime that's when we see the lions share of flow from IRWD; during the summer, when they are reclaiming, their flows drop off significantly. IRWD also, because of the sewage treatment plant, to centralize solids processing and taking advantage of the economy of scale here, they discharge their sludges into the sewer line and they come down here. We capture them in our treatment process and then process them further and they go off for beneficial reuse. There are some direct costs related to that and we capture that in one particular charge that we bill them for. One other complication is, not all IRWD is served by District 14. There are some flows that exclusively go to their treatment plant and do not come here. On issues of consolidation, there is really two basic options here. One is to complete the ongoing negotiations with IRWD before proceeding with consolidation or to run some kind of a parallel process. The current situation is that we bill them directly for the actual costs of operating and they pay that and pass it onto their users. The consolidation alternative for their operating costs is to continue that practice of billing them, or to implement an entire new direct relationship with all the users in that area and that would imply having to get user charges adopted and passed onto the property tax bill. Staff isn't suggesting that, it's just one of the ...this is most dramatic with District 14 but there are variations of that with the other districts and I'll show you on the tables in a minute. All the districts pay their equity share of the capital facilities based on the actual flows that come to our facilities. We looked at a 3 year average and we divvied up the costs of the capital facilities on that basis. That is not the case with District 14. They have purchased 15 million gallons from the capacity and their equity share is based on 15 million gallons. The rest of the districts swing with actual conditions, district 14 has been stuck at 15 million gallons for 10 years. They use far less...the comment is that they actually discharge far less than that. The expectations 10 years ago was with all the building going on, and without the expectation of conservation that occurred, we reasonably believed that within the 10 year life of the contract we'd see flows approaching 15 million gallons a day and that was one of the operating assumptions under which the contract was initially entered into. It didn't turn out to be that way. So while the rest of you were paying your equity share based on actual, IRWD was paying based on 15 MGD. Arguably, that was part of their cost of buying into the club, and was certainly part of the original intent of the agreement 10 years ago, but there is an opener in 1995 to revisit that issue. So we have that in mind, that conditions today, 10 years later, might drive us toward re-negotiating what is a fair share. The other thing that's unique is that district 14 hold onto their capital reserves and pays us on an on-going basis, their belief being that they can get better returns than we can on reserves and for that reason it's only pay 10 as you go. As was mentioned before, we do have preliminary steps, ongoing discussions on that...capital facilities that really two, three different questions I guess. First one is: do we commingle the existing reserves and the equity account of district 14 with all the other districts, throw it into one pot, or do we continue the negotiations regarding the return of some portion of that equity account to IRWD. The implication being, that the other eight districts will make that up to IRWD. The other issue is do we continue to have a direct billing relationship with IRWD or do we move toward the practice of moving to their customers, and we have a direct relationship with them. Tom? Tom : (inaudible) BPA: It's certainly a possibility where the Sanitation Districts operate Michelson. It's not beyond the...We tried to normalize this by equity in terms of persons served, rather than because the districts are all different sizes, if you look at just the gross number, I really don't think you get a clear picture of what the actual equity is from district to district. If you can see your own district, districts 5, 7, 11, 13 and 14 are above the line, which is an average of$401 per person served vs. 1, 2, 3 and 6 which are below the line. So a straight across the board, throw it all in the pot, that's how the issue of equity goes out. Let's look at reserves, cash reserves. Because District 14 holds onto their own reserves, they have very little money, there are some operating reserves and one- quarter's worth of capital reserves that are transferred over to us, the rest of it they hold onto and you can see where the other districts are. An average of$216 per person with considerable variation in District to District. Long term debt: Again, and District 13 really falls into this one as well, is the other Districts are the ones who have been doing the borrowing up until now and you can see there is a significant variation in that, another issue that needs to be addressed. On the issue of...property taxes: taxes, user fees, and then the total of the two in the green, Mike I'm not sure, is that district 14 line correct? Mike: Except there is no property tax revenue there. That's correct, there is no property tax revenues so it's equal to user fees equal the total. The user fees are equal to the total, because there are no property tax revenues.. BPA: The green line is really the total between property taxes and user fees. You can see the variation in that. We would recommend at this point that we just hold everything as status quo, waiting to see what happens with future raids on our property tax as well as what will be ultimately user fees as various issues will come out I guess over the next year in our capital reserves and what we may be doing in terms of landfills and other facilities. You can see there is considerable variation and depending upon where you sit, and depending on what category you look at, you district may do better or worse under consolidation. Over time, as property taxes are lost, we would expect to make that up with user fees, but we wouldn't at this point suggest that we bring the user fees down for those districts that are ahead of the game now. That would issue have to be ... _? (inaudible) 11 DFM: That answer to that would be yes, the difference now is $100 a year for 5, and $50 a year for some of the others. The answer is yes, we would bring everybody up to the highest. We're not talking about lowering anybody's. At least that would be the staff recommendation. BPA: In terms of the rates that we charge, for large regional plants we're one of the very lowest in the country, some of the highest, Boston, is $600 a year right now per household, so it's probably about $250 on average for individuals. GULLIXSON: (inaudible) BPA: You're looking at the comparison of taxes plus user fees graph? UNKNOWN: That chart that's up there now is not in the handout. That's a correct statement, and this chart up here is just showing existing property tax structure and user fee structure. It's not talking about what it would like if it was consolidated. The one in the handout attempts to show you what it would look like if it was a consolidation. BPA: This is per person. We were looking at trying to normalize by parcel, but the trouble with that is some of the districts have a higher number of multiple family dwelling units per parcel and it starting screwing things up so we thought we would just get down to basically the average person within your district, what is their stake in the question. The recommendation is in your packages tonight, to receive and file the staff report and consider for resolution approving the recommendation to consolidate the 9 separate districts into one, with a single board of directors made up of one representative from each of the agencies that, one from each city, sanitary, water district, one from unincorporated portion of the county, and to direct staff to initiate all steps necessary for the LAFCO process. UNKNOWN: I have a question, you had a motion. Let's answer some questions first. Blake, before, would you explain the differences in general terms of why the costs from one district to another exists, I know I'm not defending district 5 but it jumps out all the time and has a lot to do with the coastal situation, and I think district 11 has a similar problem of capital costs, pumping costs and operating costs and some of the inequities that we talk about that exist, just because a district exists doesn't mean that an inequity doesn't exist within a district like district 3 which goes from the coast to the mountain. BPA: Right. This is the average operating cost per person. As you can see, district 5 is a significant outlier and the reason why is a series of pump stations that are necessary to move wastewater from Newport Beach up to our plant 2 and for that reason there are additional operating, electrical, maintenance costs associated with that, as well as long- term capital impacts. You might argue, well, district 5 has additional operating costs like that, shouldn't they be in a revenue zone exclusive to their own. It turns out there are areas in district 5, the gravity to our facilities have virtually no pumping. On the other hand, some of the larger districts, district 3 is a good example of that, you have people in district 3 who are across the street who are charged the same amount as people who live In La Habra. The cost to construct the sewer to get it here and of course the 12 associated operating costs, are significantly different, so there is a wide range of differences throughout the agencies depending on where you reside about what the actual cost to deliver sewer service by this agency really is. Of course that goes for both regional services from police to fire to whatever you can see in your own cities where there is significant variation in the cost, demand of a particular user and yet the revenue you get from your users is fairly flat across the agencies. JC: Sal had his hand up, John, I'll get to you for a motion. But let me get some other questions or input because this is important that you try to understand as best we can on this. Sal? Well, let me deal with questions first. Jan? DEBAY: (inaudible) JC: This doesn't go to LAFCO, what we're looking at here, these are decisions we make. Go ahead. TLW: Well, the Executive Committee wrestled with this and the staff report going through the committees was to follow the direction of the Board and to initiate the studies and the proposals, including initiating the LAFCO. Because there was several concerns expressed, the basic outgrowth--the decision of the Executive Committee, on a 6-3 vote, was to proceed ahead. The resolution before you tonight does not authorize filing a LAFCO application. That is not the intent of the Manager or anyone else at the staff level, to initiate until it gets to the Committee and has reviewed the studies. And that's why the resolution is really pretty broad and generic and it was essentially designed to find out if there was any absolute opposition to the idea of consolidation. That's why the first paragraph just says we support in concept, and the second says direct staff and my office to undertake the studies that would be necessary to file an application with LAFCO. So that's what the Chair pointed out a little bit ago. I may take us—we're shooting for 30 days to get some of these studies, but some of those studies are a little complex, the finance dept. has done a lot already, but there's a lot more to do. It may 30, it may be 60 days before those studies could be presented back to the board committees to get an up or down vote. If we are ready, or we don't choose to go to LAFCO... JC: Dan? (inaudible) JC: The Board will make the final decision and has been every step of the way and would continue with that. Sheldon do you have a question? SINGER: (inaudible) JC: Any other questions? GRIFFIN: (inaudible) 13 JC: Ok, well I think John's got a motion, right? GULLIXSON: Before I make a motion, (inaudible) JC: Ok. Everybody heard the motion. Any opposition to that motion? Yes, Sal. SAPIEN: (inaudible) JC: It's the same thing. OK, we have a motion, second, any opposition. We're going to continue to work on this, Dan? WELCH: (inaudible) BPA: We weren't suggesting that. JC: One of the items that have been suggested is that we could set up zones within one district that have retained that same user fee in that area that exists today. But that is something that we will evaluate as we go along. OK, any other discussion, Yes? LEIPZIG: (inaudible) JC: I wasn't trying to imply that. From a finance standpoint we could merge all the financing into one, that's doable, regardless of where the revenue comes from. You revenue, which is the real issue, if user fees can be defined any way you want to define it. You can leave it exactly the way it is, as revenue-generating zones, rather than districts, you could reevaluate those in the future if you head some that are very costly zones that might look different than what they look like today, or you could flatten the thing, but that's up to the Board. DFM: Mr. Chair, I think one thing that Blake touched on, Vic, is that if we're talking about inflation only, it may be a very long time before you raise—if you're talking about losing your property tax which has been discussed as you know, it could be sooner, and that was the point. Tom? SALTARELLI: I think the direction we're going...is that when we do make the decision..possible that the equity is possible to eliminate...(inaudible) SCOTT: (inaudible) JC: OK. We have a motion and a second on the floor and I haven't seen any opposition, alright. So motion passes unanimously. And that does cover all of a, b and c. OK Let' s move to B9. Don, would you like to address this one? DFM: Mr. Chair, I think the most important thing that you hired me to do is get the right people in the right places. And we've gone through a fairly exhaustive process of recruiting for another assistant general manager, but as explained to the two other committees this went before, we have a provision that says if you higher above the mid- range, it requires approval of this board. So I am here tonight to ask for your approval to do that, given the fact that Judy Wilson is taking a reduction in salary to take the position and that the second highest person on the list would have to do the same thing, and the third is no longer available that we need your support of this action to move 14 forward and get this person in place and begin to make the changes the E &Y has recommended and that you have supported, so I am asking for your support of that. JC: Discussion, John? GULLIXSON: (inaudible) JC: Well I don't think you can do that. That's an opposite motion. You can make a substitute motion, but can you make it the same one, only the opposite? I didn't think you could do that, I'm sorry, Tom. Ok Well I will speak to the motion. I understand where John is coming from. I think it is the wrong to be doing this. If we felt that way about, we shouldn't have put the position in place in the first place, and the second place we shouldn't have authorized staff to go out and search for an employee in this range and the employee that came in fits the range, and certainly fits the experience level that goes in to the range and so it seems to me very unfair to staff and unfair to the employee we have identified here to now change our mind and say we're not going to do this anymore. It's just not a good way to do business. Anybody else, Sal? SAPIEN: (inaudible) SCOTT: (inaudible) SALTARELLI: (inaudible) JC: Anybody else? The substitute motion on the floor is to deny, was there a second, sorry Dan. Anybody opposed to the motion on the floor, not opposed--the substitute motion, which I don't think is a legal motion, but we won't go into that. Substitute motion is to deny the recommendation and turn down the person for the job and eliminate the position. That's the motion on the floor. Yes, Don. SAPIEN: (inaudible) TLW: Clarification. I forgot that there was a motion, I was following that the Manager had made the report and I was thinking Director Gullixson had addressed the report and was making the first motion. I was thinking that he had made it contrary to, as a substitute to what the manager was recommending or what the Executive Committee—I forgot that there had already been a motion placed on the floor to approve the report. My apologies, the substitute motion would not be in order because it is directly opposite to the motion pending on the floor. 1 just thought—we do operate, to a limited extent, on Robert's Rules, but the motion can be addressed— SCOTT: JC: Well we have asked for a question on the legality of it-- TLW: The substitute motion would be out of order if those in favor of the content of the substitute motion, their decision or choice would be to vote in opposition to the primary motion, if that fails, the floor is clear and any other motion can be made, even a motion that is, in substance, directly opposite to the first motion made. George? 15 SCOTT: (inaudible) JC: Don, that's what I was trying to accomplish and avoid this argument. Let's just process it, is that all right? So there is a substitute motion on the floor to deny the staff recommendation and deny this position. TLW: There is obviously concern on the floor and the chair has the gavel and had indicated he's going to take that motion made by Director Gullixson. JC: All in favor of denying the position, raise your hand. 3, 4, OK. Now the primary motion is on the floor, approving staff recommendations of this person in the position, anybody opposed? Raise your hands. The same 4. Motion carries. Don thanks you. DFM: Mr. Chair, the next item is the consideration of motion to receive and file the Ernest & Young financial report which was presented to the Executive Committee and it's recommended that it be received and fled by the joint boards. JC: Any questions? Do I have a motion, second? Any discussion, any opposition? All right that's unanimous. Item No. 13 is the update on the commingled investment pool. Blake, do you want to give us a briefing on this. BPA: One area that I think that probably is of primary concern of this agency is the OCIP committee and also your staff is looking at the issue of the districts owning and operating the landfills. To that extend, Price Waterhouse has been asked to exercise due diligence at what the value of the landfills are. We just brought on a consultant on a purchase order who has been operating in the landfill and hauling arena for well over a decade. Clements Environmental Engineering will take a look at the issue and we will be in an informed position to understand the financial operating and engineering issues relating to the landfills, with the expectation that things are beginning to really cook on that issue. Don? GRIFFIN: (inaudible) JC: Yes, that's right, Don. In fact, DFM has been discussing some of those issues with various people, as to whether there needs to be a JPA that includes all of the county, cities, representatives if you're into the landfill business, orjust what the structure might look like. So you're absolutely right, we need to look at all the issues, not just the financing. The financing isn't just bond financing, it has to do with revenue streams over a given period of time. What I was also going to point was that there has been a lot of discussion lately that I just want to remind you and give you a heads up about some of it you've been reading in papers or seen in proposals where there is discussion of us losing property taxes to the tune of some $31 million a year. There is also discussion about stealing the reserves or whether we want to waive our repayment claims which we have about $90 million in repayment claims. Many of us have taken the position that we don't believe in our monies being stolen, either once, twice, or 3-4 times and that's what some of this represents and so we need to continue to hang tough and figure out a way to solve this problem without having our money stolen from us. So I don't know 16 whether any of you have thoughts about that. I know John Gullixson has spoken very eloquently to the Executive Committee the other night about the lawsuit side of it, which doesn't go without saying that is an important component of this process. Waiving money that is ours and caving into property tax deal does not appeal to me at all and I would hope that the rest of you think the same way. SWAN: I think it quite urgent that the Districts look at their position and not only as a district but as cities because you're seeing played out in front of you item by item, I get you, I get you, etc. With all due respect to Bill Steiner, who I think the world of, I don't share that view on everyone on that floor and certainly not their attorney, who is, in my belief, is after everyone penny they get from us and to protect everything status quo in the county. I think there is a real serious thing. I think it's moving very very fast, there is no alternative solution to this, it is in the cities' and districts' interests to expeditiously consider things like this that there be an alternative to this Plan B that is widely ballyhooed that first takes a little from the OCTA, then takes from the city, then from the districts, has already sent around a letter to all the cities and districts about come up, tell us how much money you really have and how much we can take from you. If that doesn't chill your heart, nothing will. So I think it's absolutely important that organizations take a leadership role with an alternative and that has to come reasonably quickly. Staff has to go and look at the options at the dump. We're obviously not in the airport business but there has to be a resolution to the O.C. Bankruptcy quickly, it's in everybody's best interest. STEINER: (inaudible) JC: I wouldn't be so quick to write off the cities, Bill. They came after city money before, they can do it again. Don, you had your hand up. GRIFFIN: (inaudible) HAMMOND: (inaudible) GULLIXSON: (inaudible) FERRYMAN: (inaudible) SWAN: Jim, I heard what you say. But I go back to what Barry said and the conversation with the legislator. Getting up there and making the rationalization or defense of the reserves is not it, the deal is to solve the bankruptcy and do it quickly. So I think what the Cou ty is doing in their Plan B is developing a plan to solve the bankruptcy essentially y robbing Peter to pay off their debts. All the people in this room except Bill are Pet r and the thing is if you want to avoid this, you have to come up with another plan. I think it's incumbent upon people to work quickly to do that. JC: There is no harm in doing what Jim just suggested and I think we should do that to go on record and we can, if that's agreeable to everybody. Let me also say, and Don has brought this up before, and we've had conversations about it. I and staff have personally been involved in a lot of discussions with a lot of parties both in and out of the county trying to educate them, trying to find some form of resolution and we hope to be able to do that very soon because for all the reasons that have been expressed here I don't need to repeat them—We're in trouble, as a county. And if we don't find a solution fast, we're going to be in deeper trouble. Sal? 17 SAPIEN: (inaudible) SWAN: The problem is, that doesn't solve the bankruptcy, and that doesn't solve the $31 million and 1% property tax that comes to us and so that's hanging out there and all of a sudden rates go up by $31 million a year. SAPIEN: DFM: There is about $90-92, 90+ outstanding.. TLW: That's in the form of the senior secured and repayment claims. SWAN: It's 20 percent plus a holdback that the First Boston holdback, plus the interest. Because you're in the bond pool, you're have that special deal. JC: Jim. (inaudible) JC: And if we haven't conveyed that message, we should reinforce it, that's exactly what we have been doing. What Jim is talking about the landfill option as a solution for us and we have been working on that, how that might play. And as Don has pointed out, it's got a lot of issues associated with it, but it's one of many yet to be examined. Yes Don. Unless we put a plan on the table right here that we're going to vote on and broadcast to the world and the lawyers as to what that is going to be, we're going to continue the way we've been doing it, and we've been negotiating with a number of people, the landfill people, the county, the legislators, other cities and other people to try to find a proper solution to this. But I don't feel it's fair, Don, to put one out there and I don't think it's fair to say that we aren't doing anything, because staff and I have been doing a lot. When something is available to us that we can vote on, we'll put that forward, but I don't think when—this is like being in a legal battle where you don't want to tell your adversaries who is stealing your money what your game plan is. The only thing I can convey to you is that there is some very serious discussions going on about several different game plans, so it's not the issue of nothing is being done. George? George: (inaudible) Tom: (inaudible) JC: You're Tom. I've heard in several different discussion as one component of it, and I think that the big message you're conveying is that we do this as a County family. We do have to figure out all the options that are available to us and how can we work together to solve them ourselves and not have the cram-down from the legislature. That item and several others have been put forth to deal with as a package. Jan and then Bill. DEBAY: (inaudible) JC: It's not just as simple as our reserves, it is the income off the property taxes. It's even a more significant issue at $31 million a year, that goes away fast. There is, I'm 18 told, legislation that is ready to come forward on this that could have a lot of impact on a lot of us and we're working to kill it. JC: I might add to that, because I had made reference being involved in some discussions and the OCIP committee, which BPA sits on, has invited DFM and I and others to come in and comment on issues as to how we might develop a strategy. One of them is similar to what Bill was talking about and I mentioned it to the Executive Committee the other night, and that's the creation of a friendly bank as it is called on some terms. The idea is you might create a JPA that is finance-oriented, it could look to assets of the County as a revenue stream, it could look to our own property taxes as a stream if we needed to, it could look to the repayment debt as an asset if you can call it that, its a build-on, if you look to existing reserves that could become financible to allow us to begin to finance this whole financial arena ourselves and not have somebody else do it for us and through our own JPA that could happen. It's just one of many different ideas that have been put forth. Its a financial mechanism that's been put forth. As Bill said, he's been talking about it for some time but it's an example of the kinds of things we need to have on the table and be talking about if were going to get our way out of the financial end of this problem. Now, if John Gullixson is successful and gets $2 billion out of the investment bankers, we're all home free, and so I think all of these efforts are valuable to pursue, but we do have to come up with a pretty good plan very very fast and that's what staff and several of the rest of us are trying to accomplish. I think—is there any more discussion on this? We really are trying to do something and put a plan forth and I think we will real soon. Sal? Well you could as one or two agencies you could do that, that might happen, but it's a matter of seeing whether we can get other agencies that will cooperate with us and so far that hasn't materialized as a proposal, but its on the table as consideration. I agree with you. We can do that. But I think the risk is Sal, what Bill was talking to, one agency doing it is risky. If we can do this as partners we're a lot better off as a county family. You know how it is Sal. I heard about the Techite program for a year, and he did a great job with it, so hopefully staff and others will come out with a great job on this one too, were trying. Jim? SWAN: Mr. Chair, what I hear is a general settlement is that I think we're going to take the bull by the horns and do something and I think we're trying to formulate a plan with other people to do that, and that's not definitive so there's not a plan to talk about here, but as soon as that plan becomes definitive I'm sure that we'll all be involved. I think this organization because of its compensation (sic) has been doing that. JC: Any other comments?We will have this item back on the next agenda, I can guarantee it. We do not have a need for a closed session for tonight. So unless there is any other business, yes, Vic? LEIPZIG: (inaudible) JC: With that we're adjourned. 19 COUNTY SANITATION b DISTRICTS NOS. 1 , 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 , 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES JOINT BOARD MEETING J U LY 265 1995 Q�gZRICTS pp yQ r� 00 G � a ww F�r�pG THE EN��QOd ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Goods of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,2,3,B,B, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County,Canlomia,Was held On July 26, 1895,at 7:30 p.m.,in one Districts'Administrative Offices. Following the Redo.of Allegiance and muco don the roll Wss"find and the Secretary,reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1. 2.3.B,B, 7, 11, 13 and 14 as follmem: AMWE ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DIRECTORS E DISTRICT NO.I: y Pet a.M. Fer4 Clair Ted R.Pa" y James M.Murphy Femme,Chair pre tam _ JoanAnh Pony y Man as Muryhy Joanne Coond I'ly Rome me a ha Serelli Jim Po Hope tts r S Stanton y Wlggm G.Reiner DISTRICT NO.2: _ John Collins,Clair L George Goon y Derriel T.Welch.Chair pro lom Alm M.Owes n y Barry Dares _ Bob Bell y Buve.Durdep Glenn Planar x Norman 2.FSYen ode Carol Downey y James H.Flora Suave Anderson y Pat McGuigan Ted R.Mother y Man A.Murphy _ As.Coorm, y At.Se Cloh Relay y Sheldon Singer George L.21ekm _ Roger Sharon y William G.Steiner y Bob Zemel _ Tom Daly DISTRICT NO.3: y Sal A.SeDian,Clair Harry M.Doman y Burnie DUNep.Clair pro tam Glenn Parer Cecilia Age Walter Bowmen y George Brew. _ Merlyn S.HMdt fur _ John Colima y George Scan y James H.Flora _ Staue Anderson y Don P.Griffin _ Patsy Manlall y Victor Lelpem _ Ralph Bauer JL_ Wally Limn Eva G.Miner y Fat McGuigan Ted R.Morem y Margie L Rim _ Grace Epperson y Julle So Chris Norby Sheldon Sm,r George L.21ahm Roper Stamen y William G.Steiner x Chades Syleh Roben WaMerrom y Bob Zemel _ Tom Daly DISTRICT NO.G: g Jan Debay,Clair John C.Cox,Jr. y William G.Slower,Chair pro tam _ Roper Stamen y John C.Cox,Jr. _ Jan Den, DISTRICT NO.B: y JamM M.Ferrymen,Chair Arthur Pony y An Delzi Clair pro tee _ Jam C.Cox.Jr. y Willlm G.Steiner _ Roper Stamen DISTRICT NO.7: y Bony Hammond,Chair Mike Ward y Thomas R.Sallorelli,Chair pro ter Jr.PoRs y Jan DMey John C.Cox,Jr. y James M.Ferryman Ardor Perry y Pet McGuigan Ted A.Mo.. y Merit A.Murphy Joeme Coenn y WiDlam G.Steiner _ Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 11: y Vim Leipzig,Chao Ralph Bever y Shirley Cedbn,Chair pro tam _ Ralph Bauer Roger Same. y Wilson G.Steiner DIS TICT NO.13: y John M.Gothumn,Clair Denel T.Welch 8 y Bob Zonal,Chair We tam Tom Del, y want A.Murphy _ Joanne Coome Glenn Parker Burnie DunMp y W Ilhm G.Steiner Roger Stamen DISTRICT NO.14: y Thomas A.Seltmelli,Clair if.Pon. y Man A.Murphy,Clair pro tom Joeme Comer y Berry HammorM _ Mike WaM William G.Steiner Roger Sternon y Poar A.Swan _ Darryl Miller -2- 07/26/95 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Don McIntyre, General Manager, Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager, Penny Kyle, Board Secretary, John Finias, Gary Hasenstab, Irwin Haydock, Ed Hodges, Steve Hovey, Patricia Jonk, 3 Steve Kozak, John D. Linder, Pat McNelly, Bob G Oolen, George Robertson, Misha Rozengurt, Ed Tortes, Mike White,Paula Zeller OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Bill Knopf, Phil Stone, Alternate Director George Zlaket DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file minute excemt from the City of Seal Beach re Board Appointment That the minute excerpt from the City of Seal Beach re election of mayor, appointment of alternate Director, and seating a new member of the Board, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed, as follows: ('Mayor) District Active Director Alternate Director 3 George Brown Marilyn Bruce Hastings' ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chair recognized Director Singerwho Recognition of Director Singer re Districts' stated that the Garden Grove Sanitary District had loan to Garden Grove Sanitary District just repaid the$5 million loan the Districts granted �.../ to the Sanitary District a few months ago. He then thanked the Directors on behalf of the Sanitary District for coming to their aid when it was needed. ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chair advised those Directors who were Report of the Joint Chair not able to attend the first cruise aboard The Enchanter, the Districts' monitoring vessel, that a second trip was scheduled for July 28th. Anyone wishing to attend was asked to contact the General Manager's secretary to reserve a spot as the vessel can only accommodate a small number of guests at any one time. Joint Chair Cox also mentioned that a lour of Plant No. 2 was scheduled for August 2nd. He requested any Directors interested in attending this tour to contact Ed Hodges. The Joint Chair then advised that he was pleased to report that the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies (AMSA) had presented the Districts with the 1994 "Gold" award for their consistent compliance with all terms and conditions of their wastewater discharge requirements. J -3- 07/26/95 ✓ It was then announced that those Directors who attended one of the orientation plant tours in June were given a booklet prepared by staff titled, "An Introduction to Wastewater", which is a 15- page overview of the Districts' operation. Those Directors who did not receive a copy were asked to see the Board Secretary after the meeting. The Joint Chair then regretfully announced the passing of Director @umie Dunlap's wife, Jacquelin D. Dunlap. He requested that the Districts adjourn this meeting in her honor and memory. The Joint Chair then announced the following tentatively scheduled upcoming meetings as follows: Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization Study for Administrative Employees-Wednesday, August 2, after the Plant Tour Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee-Wednesday, September 6, at 5:30 P.M. Planning, Design and Construction Committee -Thursday, September 7, at 5:30 p.m. Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee-Wednesday, September 13, at 5:30 p.m. ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager referred the Directors to an �..d Report of General Manager Executive Budget Summary included in their meeting folders which was designed for Districts' staff. He reported that he has held sessions with four departments talking to all employees about the budget, his concerns, benchmarking and about their role in helping to achieve the objectives of benchmarking, training and our overall commitment to making a good organization better. Three more sessions are scheduled to be held in the next few weeks. Mr. McIntyre also stated that a report was included In the Directors' meeting folders on reserves and the OCIP, which was requested at the Executive Committee meeting. ALL DISTRICTS General Counsel gave a brief report on the lawsuit Report of General Counsel entitled U.S. Government v. Montrose Chemical Corp., at al. The Districts were involved in this environmental lawsuit and the case was resolved a little over a year ago. A settlement agreement had been effected that involved the Districts and all of the cities, as well as about 150 entities in Los Angeles County and another 30+ entities in San Bernardino and Ventura County. The decision by the District Court, Judge Hauk, was taken on appeal by the corporate defendants. The Court of Appeals 9th Circuit reversed his decision which approved the settlement agreement, stating the Judge hadn't independently reviewed the record. Mr. Woodruff has been participating in meetings with the Justice Department lawyers and counsel for the other settling local government entities over the last month or so and have come close to a new consent agreement. The most important point for the local entities is that EPA is not asking for ./ -4- 07/26/95 additional financial contribution. There will be a reallocation between the federal agencies that gel the proceeds, but it's not envisioned that it will have any cost effect on the cities or the Districts. In response to a question regarding an NPDES permit waiver being granted to San Diego and , how that would affect the Districts, Mr. Woodruff stated that a House of Representatives' bill that was authored by Congressman Brian Bilbray of San Diego provided-for an exemption for San Diego. Their only treatment plant is at Point Loma. Their operation is very similar to the Districts with advanced primary treatment with an ocean outfall very similar to the Districts, namely, four miles long and 300 feet deep. They have been working hard to have this legislation approved, along with another bill that was passed last year, which allowed them to file for a 301(h) waiver much like what the Districts have. That bill was signed into law and a waiver application has been filed. They received preliminary, tentative approval and expect the formal tentative ruling, which will probably be an approval, in about two weeks. In parallel with this action, special legislation which would give San Diego a perpetual "bye"was put on the Speakers "corrections day" agenda as Item No. 1 two days ago. The purpose was to particularly highlight the ridiculous federal laws that continue to exist and it passed by well over 100 votes. The San Diego situation will probably have some favorable Impact on us by setting precedence but it is also possible that it could have a reverse effect if the environmental community was to react in a backlash to the generous provisions of an outright exemption. The Assistant General Manager of Operations then reported that there was concern about there being some backlash that would be a result of the Bilbray bill which is now in the Senate. At the same time that the City was applying for a waiver similar to the Districts and up to a few months ago, EPA was strenuously opposed to a waiver down in San Diego, as well as much of the environmental community. Mr. Anderson further stated that on August 28th the Districts' application will be six years since we applied for a five-year extension to our existing five-year permit. The Districts have been operating under the provisions of a 301(h)waiver since 1985. Eleven years have been allowed out of one, five-year permit due wholly to EPA's inaction on our application. The Districts continue the marine monitoring program and believe it is important to continue monitoring the measurements of Districts' effluent from its'treatment plant and to continue to demonstrate that the Districts are not impacting the environment. That has been the strategy the Districts have used consistently since the mid-1980s, and was the strategy that allowed the Districts to be the first recipient of a waiver in the country for large POTWs. It's the strategy that keeps the Districts in good favor with, and trusted by, EPA, State of California and the environmental community. ALL DISTRICTS This being the annual meeting fixed by the Boards Annual Election of Joint Chair of Directors for the election of the Chair of the Joint Administrative Organization, following a review by the General Counsel of the balloting procedures, the Secretary stated that Director John C. Cox, Jr. had been nominated at the regular meeting of the Joint Boards on June 28, 1995, in accordance with established procedures. There being no other nominations, the vote was then polled, and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director John C. Cox, Jr. as Chair of the Joint Administrative Organization. `r. -5- 07/26/95 ALL DISTRICTS This being the annual meeting fixed by the Boards `.✓ Annual Election of Vice Joint Chair of Directors for the election of the Vice Chair of the Joint Administrative Organization, the Joint Chair ` then called for nominations for the post,whereupon Directors Daniel T. Welch, Sal A. Sapien, and Peer A. Swan were nominated. Director Sal A. Sapien declined the nomination. The vote was then polled by the balloting procedure as explained by General Counsel. The Joint Chair then announced that Director Peer A. Swan had been elected to the post of Vice Chair of the Joint Administrative Organization. Vice Joint Chair Swan then thanked the Directors for supporting him. He stated that at the end of the year he would be stepping down from the Irvine Ranch Water District Chairmanship. He also stated that the Districts pioneered variable rate debt and saved the Districts anywhere from $10- $70 million in debt financing. DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held June 28, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held June 28, 1995, �.d the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held June 28, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held June 28, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICTS There being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held June 28, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held June 28, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. 6 07/26/95 DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or amendments to the Aooroval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held June 28, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held June 28, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held June 28, 1995, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratification of Payment of Joint and Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on exhibits"A"and"B"attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. O6/28/95 07/12/95 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $615,471.98 $936,231.86 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 76,756.59 287,789.47 Joint Working Capital Fund - 255,664.00 134,867.36 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 41,882.03 71,739.57 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 1,527.83 69.45 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 9,208.89 3,372.19 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 381,814.92 169,491.71 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 5,836.85 4,610.97 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 1,382.51 51.90 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 21,899.48 6,244.42 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 92,625.24 2,801.59 DISTRICT NO. 13 - 0.00 2.55 DISTRICT NO. 14 - 359,372.16 46.98 DISTRICTS NOS 5 & 6 JOINT - 692.93 2,363.04 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 211.12 0.00 DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 786.56 20,543.13 $1,865,133.09 $1.640.226.19 -7- 07/26/95 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: `.✓ Awardina Purchase of Anionic Polvelsotrolyte Chemical Polymer. That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Soecification No. "35. to Polvoure. Inc. Resolution No. 95-77, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Purchase of Anionic Polyelectrolyte Chemical Polymer, Specification No. C-035, to Polypure, Inc., for the price of$1.69 per pound, plus sales tax, foLa one year pedod beginning September 1, 1995, with provision for four one-year extensions. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing membership in Southern California Alliance of Publicly Owned That membership in the Southern California Treatment Works (SCAP) Alliance of Publicly Owned Treatment Works (SCAP) for the 1995-96 fiscal year, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carded: Receive and file draft minutes of the Steedna Committee That the draft minutes of the Steedng Committee meeting held on June 28, 1995, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carded: Receive and file draft minutes of the �..i Operations. Maintenance and Technical That the draft minutes of the Operations, Services Committee Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting held on July 5, 1995, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carded: Receive and file draft minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization That the draft minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re Study for Administrative Employees Space Utilization Study for Administrative Employees meeting held on July 6, 1996, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file draft minutes of the Plannina. Design and Construction That the draft minutes of the Planning, Design and Committee Construction Committee meeting held on July 6, 1995, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. -8- 07/26/95 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file draft minutes of the Finance Administrative and Human That the draft minutes of the Finance, Resources Committee Administrative and Human Resources Committee meeting held on July 12, 1995, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. Moved, seconded and duly carried: ALL DISTRICTS That the draft minutes of the Executive Committee Receive and file draft minutes of the meeting held on July 19, 1995, as amended by Executive Committee Director Guliixson, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS (OMTS95-036) Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the General Manger to enter into an Agreement with Southern California That the General Manager be, and is hereby, Edison re "ENVEST" Program authorized to enter into an Engineering Feasibility Studies Agreement with Southern California Edison "ENVEST" Program to study energy conservation measures at the Districts' treatment plants, for an amount not to exceed $30,000.00. Director William G. Steiner requested that his abstention be made a matter of record. ALL DISTRICTS (OMTS95-038) Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with That the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Ernst &Young providing for additional Services Committee certification of the final services negotiated fee relative to Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with Ernst& Young for development of documentation and training for conducting process improvement analysis of key programs within the Technical Services Department, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 95-79, approving Addendum No. 4 to said agreement with Ernst& Young for said additional services, for an additional amount not to exceed $20,000.00, increasing the total authorized compensation from an amount not to exceed $453,000.00 to an amount not to exceed $473,000.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS (POC95-24) Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to issue Purchase order _ to Pioneer-Standard Electronics for two That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue a VAX 4000 Model 705A Computers for Plant purchase order to Pioneer-Standard Electronics for No 2 Automation for the Ocean Outfall the Purchase of Two VAX 4000 Model 705A Booster Station (Specification No. E-257) Computers for Plant No. 2 Plant Automation for the Ocean Outfall Booster Station (Specification No. E-257), in an amount not to exceed $357,266.95 plus tax. Director Mark A. Murphy requested that his abstention be made a matter of record. _g. ,ash 07/26/95 ALL DISTRICTS (POC95-25) Moved, seconded and duly carried: `.' Authorizing the Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization Study to solicit negotiate, award That the Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization and issue purchase orders re Modifications Study, be, and is hereby, authorized to solicit, to the Existing Interior Space in the negotiate, award and Issue purchase orders to Administration Building for General various vendors for Modifications to the Existing Management. Administration and Interior Office Spacejn the Administration Building Communications Offices. Specification for General Management, Administration and No. E-256 Communications Offices, Specification No. E-256, in an amended amount not to exceed $130,000.00. ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR95-31) Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adopting Investment Performance Review Guidelines for the Districts' Investment That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Program Resolution No. 95-78, adopting Investment Performance Review Guidelines for the Districts' Investment Program. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR95-32) Actions re IRS-approved Section 457 Deferred Compensation Plan Approving amendment to Deferred Moved, seconded and duly carried: Compensation Plan for Officers and `a.✓ Employees That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 95-80, approving amendment to Deferred Compensation Plan for Officers and Employees, providing for greater Flexibility in plan distribution elections, clarifying certain provisions of the Plan, and complying with certain recent Internal Revenue Service interpretations. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. Approving amended Deferred Moved, seconded and duly carried: Compensation Program for Executive Management Group That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Employees and Management. Resolution No. 95-81, approving amended Professional and Supervisory Deferred Compensation Program for Executive Employees Management Group Employees and Management, Professional and Supervisory Employees. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR95-341 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Amendment No 13 to Aoreement for Employment of General That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Counsel Resolution No. 95-82, approving Amendment No. 13 to Agreement for Employment of General Counsel. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ./ -10- 07/26/95 ALL DISTRICTS (EXEC95-01) Actions re Consolidation of the Districts Presentation and discussion Directors expressed concern that it was too soon to take a position on the consolidation of the Districts and that there were several issues that needed to be resolved prior to making any decisions. The Joint Chair stated that this agenda was requesting approval only, in concept, of the consolidation process. He further stated that staff will have to go through a filing process with LAFCO which will take approximately 30-60 days just to compile and complete the application information, and staff would not take the application to LAFCO until the Directors had reviewed and approved said application. Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager of Operations, then gave a brief presentation on the proposed consolidation of the Districts, as well as General Counsel who briefly reported on the various options available to the Districts under California law. Receive and file staff report That the Staff Report dated July 14, 1995, regarding consolidation of the nine separate districts, be and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Approving, in concept. consolidation Moved, seconded and duly carried: of the nine separate districts into one single sanitation district That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 95-83, approving, in concept, consolidation of the nine separate districts into one single sanitation district, with a single board of directors made up of one representative each for every city, sanitary district, water district and unincorporated portion of the county within the sanitation districts' service area and now represented on one or more of the existing nine sanitation districts. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. Directing staff to prepare steps Moved, seconded and duly carried: necessary to complete a reorganization of the nine separate That staff be, and is hereby, directed to prepare all districts into one district steps necessary, including preparing applications and supporting information to LAFCO, necessary for the reorganization of the nine separate districts into one district, and to provide same to the Boards of Directors at a future meeting for its review and approval prior to the filing of same to LAFCO. ALL DISTRICTS (EXEC95-03) It was moved and seconded: Authorizing the General Manager to employ Judith Wilson at the top of the salary range That the General Manager be authorized to employ , for the position of Assistant General Judith Wilson at the top of the salary range for the Manager-Administration position of Assistant General Manager- Administration. A substitute motion was then made to deny the recommendation and eliminate the position. _11_ 07/26/95 `...' The motion failed. It was then duly carried: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to employ Judith Wilson at the top of the salary range for the position of Assistant General Manager-Administration. Directors John Gullixson, Barry Hammond, Margie Rice and Daniel T. Welch requested that their opposition to the motion be made a matter of record. ALL DISTRICTS (EXEC95-04) Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file the Finance Function Review- Final Report of Ernst & Young That the Finance Function Review- Final Report prepared by Ernst &Young, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager of Status report re County's Comminaled Operations, gave a brief report on the status of the Investment Pool bankruptcy and the Orange County Investment Pool. He also reported that staff was studying the possibility of the Districts purchasing the landfills currently owned and operated by the County of Orange. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adioumment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of `..� County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned in memory of Jacquelin D. Dunlap, wife of Director Burnie Dunlap. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:55 p.m. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Contract No. 2-9-R1 That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-R1, authorizing an addition of$98,030.23 to the contract with Colich Bros., Inc. dba Colich& Sons, for four items of additional work, and granting a time extension of eight calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adioumment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned in memory of Jacquelin D. Dunlap, wife of Director Burnie Dunlap. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:55 p.m. -12- 07/26/95 DISTRICTS 3 & 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and deny claim of Colich Bros.. Inc. dba Colich & Sons. for a fuel spill in That the claim of Colich Bros., Inc. dba Colich & connection with Slater Avenue Pump Sons received June 21, 1995, in the amount of Station. Contract No. 11-17-1 $300,208.22, plus unspecified additional expenses and legal expenses, for a fuel spill in connection with Slater Avenue Pump Station, Contract No. 11-17-1, be, and j, hereby, received, ordered filed, and denied; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said claim be, and is hereby, referred to the Districts' General Counsel and liability claims administrator for appropriate action. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carded: Adioumment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned in memory of Jacquelin D. Dunlap, wife of Director Burnie Dunlap. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:55 p.m. DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 1 to the Plans and specifications for Contract No. 5.37-3 That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3, Contract No. 5-37-3, for an addition of$60,458.08 to the contract with Wal-Con Construction Company for two items of additional work, and granting a time extension of 60 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adioumment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned in memory of Jacquelin D. Dunlap, wife of Director Burnie Dunlap. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:55 p.m. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adioumment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned in memory of Jacquelin D. Dunlap, wife of Director Burnie Dunlap. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:55 p.m. DISTRICT 7 Actions re Master Plans prepared by Boyle Engineering Corporation for Contract Nos. 7-16, 7-18 and 7-19 Receive and file Master Plan for Moved, seconded and duly carried: Lemon Heights Sewer System Contract No. 7-16 That the Master Plan for Lemon Heights Sewer System, Contract No. 7-16, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. -13- 07/26/95 Receive and file Master Plan for Moved, seconded and duly carried: Orange Park Acres Sewer System. Contract No. 7-18 That the Master Plan for Orange Park Acres Sewer System, Contract No. 7-18, be, and is hereby, received and ordered fled. Receive and file Master Plan for Moved, seconded aqd duly carried: Cowan Heights Sewer System, Contract No. 7-19 That the Master Plan for Cowan Heights Sewer System, Contract No. 7-19, be, and is hereby, receeved and ordered filed. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adioumment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned in memory of Jacquelin D. Dunlap, wife of Director Burnie Dunlap. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:55 p.m. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adioumment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned in memory of Jacquelin D. Dunlap, wife of Director Burnie Dunlap. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:55 p.m. DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: �../ Adioumment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned in memory of Jacquelin D. Dunlap, wife of Director Burnie Dunlap. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:55 p.m. DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adioumment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned in memory of Jacquelin D. Dunlap, wife of Director Burnie Dunlap. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:55 p.m. Secretary of th oa of Directors of County Sa tion ' tricts Nos. 1, 2, 3, , , 7, 11, 13 and 14 `" -14- FUNDNO 91M JT DISTWORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE MI/95 PAGE1 REPORTNUMBERAP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID MOMS POSTING DATE 0SQ8/BS WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPRON 145416 AC DELCO SYSTEMS E612.11 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145417 ASK CORPORATION $1.628.17 GAUGE 145418 ASR ANALYSIS 5516.50 PUMPANALYSIS 146419 ATM AA,INC. 5765.00 LAB SERVICES 145420 AT&T-PROWATTS $151.89 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 145421 ADVANCED MFG.INSTITUTE $1.590.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION-MTCE PLANNING&SCHEDULING 14MV ALBERTSONS MARKET 5604 E221.02 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 14MM ALLTEK CIRCUIT,INC. $1.940.66 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145424 AMERIDATA $1,168.01 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 145425 AMERICAN AIR FILTER,INC. $1.217.58 FILTERS 145426 AMERICAN POWER PRODUCTS $781.77 TRUCK PARTS 145427 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION 54,500.00 SEWER REPAIRS 145428 ANIXTER-DISTRIBUTION $9,155.77 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 145429 ABC LABORATORIES E1.395A0 LAB SERVICES m 14MM AQUATIC CENTER $1.020.00 SAFETY SUPPLIES X 145431 ARROWHEAD ELECTRIC CORP. SK06.92 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 2 145432 ARROWHEAD PRODUCTS E1,323.05 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145433 ASSOCIATED VACUUM TECH.,INC. $945.98 PUMP PARTS to 145434 AMSA 9425.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION-AMSA TECHNICAL CONF. 146435 ATKIN/JONES COMPUTER SERVICE $321.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT D 145Kn AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING 5199.77 PAYROLL SERVICES 145437 BANANA BLUEPRINT $9,392.96 PRINTING M.O.11-07-94 F-- 14MM BARTLETT CENTER $624.41 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145439 BAUER COMPRESSOR $139.12 COMPRESSOR PARTS 146440 BAXTER EDWARDS $1.550.72 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145441 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $1.893.90 LAB SUPPLIES 145442 BONJVRUES 5371.88 TRUCK PARTS 145W3 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP 524,634.66 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-7-1,3J8 1454W BRENNER-FIEDLER&ASSOC..INC. $298.15 COMPRESSOR PARTS 145WS BRISTOL INDUSTRIES $670.00 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 14544E BUDGETJANITORW. $3,330.00 JANITORIAL SERVICES / 145447 CS COMPANY $162.20 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 14544E CALFON CONSTRUCTION E352,1W.00 CONSTRUCTION 3.38.2 145W9 CAL-PAC CHEMICAL CO.,INC. 5363.31 CHEMICALS 145450 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $1,101.72 SERVICEAGREEMENT 145451 CALIFORNIA FINEBLANKING CORP. $4.480.61 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145452 JOHN D.CASE&ASSOC. $995.00 SECURITY CONSULTANT 145453 CENTURY SAFETY INST.&SUPPLY $4.250.14 SAFETY SUPPLIES 14MM CERFNET $37.40 COMPUTER SERVICES 14USS CHANDLER LIQUID ASSET NOW. $2,IW.W INVESTMENT CONSULTANT M.O.2-395 145456 CIMCO E913.W REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145457 CINEDOME THEATRES $228.90 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 146450 COAST RUBBER STAMP 694.17 OFFICESUPPLIES I0. m COUCH&SONS $05.120.00 CONSTRUCTION 11-17-1 14MW COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA E1,418.30 FITTINGS 145481 COMPUSA,INC. $312.45 COMPUTER SOFTWARE FUND NO 9199 - UT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE V 21195 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMSPAIDO&28K95 POSTINGDATE0 QW5 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 145462 CONNEL GM PARTS/DIV. $262.01 TRUCK PARTS 145463 CON-WAYWESTERNEXPRESS $113.14 FREIGHTCHARGES 145464 CONSUMER PIPE 549.94 MECHANICAL PARTS 145465 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $1,11862 INSTRUMENT PARTS 145466 CORANADO SQUARE $1.450.20 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145467 COUNTERPART ENTERPRISES $2,107A4 COMPRESSOR PARTS 145468 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $1,263.96 ELECTRIC PARTS 145469 CHARLES P.CROAL Y.CO. $2,570.74 INSTRUMENT PARTS 145470 CUSTOM ENAMELERS,INC. $1,427AI REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145471 SWRCB/AFRS $1,000.00 MEMBERSHIP FEE 145472 DATA ELECTRONICS SER. $3W N REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145473 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIF. 548.019.55 DENTAL INSURANCE PLAN M.0.1-12-M 145474 DEL TACO 026 $1,771.84 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145475 DENNY'S RESTAURANT 01509 $461.79 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT m 145478 DEZURICK ANDIOR CS CO. $4,232.11 VALVES X 145477 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. 55,18060 OFFICE EQUIPMENT = 145478 DIGITAL LEARNING CENTER $8,70060 TRAINING REGISTRATION-SUPPORTING WINDOWS NT w 145479 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $999.49 PAINT SUPPLIES 145480 DWYER INSTRUMENT,INC. $218.79 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES -1 14MBI ESP NORTH 3508]4 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES n 145482 EATON CORPIMSC PRODUCTS $304.11 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145483 EDWARDS DIV.OF GS BLDG SYS. $146.14 SAFETY SUPPLIES IJ 14544 ELECTAIRTOOLCO. $6,711.82 MECHANICAL PARTS 145485 ENCHANTER,INC. $3,920.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6.1092 14MM EVANS CONSOLES $23.020.79 COMPUTER SOFTWARE CONSULTANT 145487 MARSHALL FAIRRES $28.08 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 14548E FARR SALES B SERVICE $808.14 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 145489 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $335.97 FILTERS 145490 FISCHER 8 PORTER CO. 5808.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS 145491 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $553,33 LAB SUPPLIES 145482 FLUORAMICS.INC. 6312.56 OPERATING SUPPLIES 1 145493 FOUNTAINVALLEYCAMERA $81.81 PHOTO SUPPLIES 145494 THE FOXBORO CO. $1.733.0 INSTRUMENT PARTS 145495 FRANCE COMPRESSOR PRODUCTS $11,50.27 COMPRESSOR PARTS 145498 GST,INC. 54,613.66 OFFICE SUPPLIES 145497 GSF ENERGY,INC. 54,063.81 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145496 GALLADE CHEMICAL,INC. $178.97 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145499 GAMAHLLUMBERCO. $1,734.26 LUMBER8IAROWARE 145500 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $436.39 CHEMICALS 145501 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $716.88 ELECTRIC PARTS 145502 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. 56,982.06 TELEPHONE SERVICES 145503 GEORGE B SONS COIN-OP LAUNDRY $210.00 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145504 GIERUCH-MITCHELL,INC. $2,07.29 MECHANICAL PARTS 145505 GRAHAM MANUFACTURING CO.,INC. $508.86 PUMP PARTS 145M GRASBY S.T.I. $58920 INSTRUMENT PARTS 145W7 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $2,070.05 OFFICE SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 621N5 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 062M95 POSTING DATE 0&28195 WARRANTNO. VENDOR AMOUNT 145508 DAVID M.GRIFFITH&ASSOC. SI3,9XLW PROF.SERV.-EXECUTIVE SEARCH 145509 H KOCH&SONS $53.16 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145510 W PENNY INN ANAHEIM 8650AI REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145511 MACH COMPANY $105.84 LAB SUPPLIES 145512 FREDA HARPER $1.100.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 145513 HATCH&KIRK INC. $2.090.94 MECHANICAL PARTS 145514 PL HAWN CO,INC. SWIM FILTERS 145515 HOME DEPOT $405.73 HARDWARE 145516 HUGHES AIRCRAFT $531.08 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145511 HUNTINGTON SUPPLY $134.69 HARDWARE 145518 ORANGE COUNTY FED.CREDIT UNION 888D.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 145519 ICN BIOMEDICALS,INC. 8284.85 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 14020 IEEE SERVICE CENTER-007 891.00 PUBLICATION 146621 IPCO SAFETY &18,235.91 SAFETY SUPPLIES FTl 145522 ISLUACONFERENCE $525.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 146523 ITT CANNON ELECTRIC P5344 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT = t45524 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $46,380.79 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11-18-92 145525 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $2,217,09 CONNECTORS to 145526 INTEC PRODUCTS,INC. $1.702.97 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT --4 145527 INTERSTATE ELECTRONICS CORP. $51125 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT n 145520 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT 831.64 WATER USE 145529 J2 PRINTING SERVICES 836GI9 PRINTING 1sl 145530 JAMISON ENGINEERING $11,178.12 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 145531 GREATVJESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY. 81,262.84 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 145632 JT LEE INVESTMENT 8289.22 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145533 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $633.08 ELECTRIC PARTS 1455M JONATHAN MANUFACTURING 81,169JU REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 14505 GEORGE A.JONES 9399.28 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145536 KING BEARING,INC. 81,004.88 MACHINE SUPPLIES 14037 KINSBURSKY BROS.SUPPLY $218.65 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145538 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $3.431.34 TOOLS 1 145539 KOM KAI MOBILE HOME PARK $1.215.55 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145540 LA OUINTA MOTOR INN 6206.78 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145541 LATRONICS 5323.22 TRAINING EQUIPMENT 145542 LAWICRANDAL,INC. 8920.CD LEGAL SERVICES M.0.7-131NI 145543 FOX LAWSON&ASSOC, $3,518.0D PROFESSIONAL SERVICES-MPRP 145W LEARNING TREE INTERNATIONAL $1.995.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING REGISTRATION 145545 LEE&RO CONSULTING ENGR. $5,410.13 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1.40-1 145546 IA LIQUID HANDLING SYSTEMS $3,613.75 PUMP PARTS 145547 MPS 8441.08 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 146648 R.F.MACDONALD CO. $30D.00 INSTRUMENTREPAIRS t45549 MACOMOO $577.20 SERVICE AGREEMENT 145550 MACTEMPS $540.00 TEMPORARY PERSONNEL 145551 MAG SYSTEMS $342.16 INSTRUMENTPARTS 14052 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS,INC. $1,502.04 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 145553 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. 91,898.00 CONSTRUCTION P242-2 FUND NO SIN JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE MINTS PAGE4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID OBFIBI9S POSTING DATE MI2M5 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 1455M MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS E210.85 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 145555 MCKENNA ENGR.&EQUIP. $1,087.50 PUMP PARTS 145556 MEASUREMENT VARIABLES $289.02 ELECTRIC PARTS 14507 MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. E172.M INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 14058 MICROBIAL INSIGHTS,INC. $600.00 CONSULTING SERVICES M.O.11.18-92 145559 MIDWAY MFG.&MACHINING 54,180.37 PUMP PARTS 145M0 MILLETT INDUSTRIES $88.20 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145561 MISSION ABRASIVE SUPPLIES E135.37 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 145582 MISSION INDUSTRIES 53,796.25 UNIFORM RENTALS 145563 MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION IIU3,910.54 CONSTRUCTION 14-14A 145564 MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE S10,OM.00 RATING SERVICE MAINTENANCE FEES 145565 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $70.35 SAFETY FILM RENTALS 145%6 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $199.60 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 145587 NEUTRON $3,507.07 ANIONIC POLYMER M.O.&I0.94 1455M NORTEL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS 58,262.W TELEPHONE SERVICE AGREEMENT m 145569 NOVA POWER,INC. E6,304.00 MECHANICALTESTING X 1455M OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES 5452.39 SAFETYGLASSES 2 145572 THEOHORANGE COUNTY E8,029.91 TRAINING REGISTRATION-GAUGE SAFETYrtECH.TRAININ0 W 1d55]2 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. $29.91 TRUCK PARTS 145573 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $1.855.26 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 14074 ORANGE COURIER $267.30 COURIER SERVICES ]? 145575 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. $1,074.43 FITTINGS r 14MM OXYGEN SERVICE $2,177.05 SPECIALTY GASES 145577 P&D ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES $3,458.51 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY 145578 PSSI E) AI SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION 145579 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY E4,050.96 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 145680 PACIFIC PARTS $5,671.27 INSTRUMENT PARTS 145M1 PACIFIC BELL $1.179.0 TELEPHONE SERVICES 145M PACIFIC WATER CONDITIONING CO. E299.00 EQUIPMENT RENTALS 14093 PAGENET $967.49 RENTALEQUIPMENT 1455M PALMIERI,TYLER,WIENER, $40.00 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.8.12-911 145MS PARTS UNLIMITED $366.30 TRUCK PARTS 1455M COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $5,780.08 REIMS.PETTY CASH,MINING&TRAVEL 145557 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. E127,4M.26 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.54L91 145MS PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS S962.74 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 145S89 POHLSON,MOORHEAD&GOETHALS $1.501.50 CAL-0SHA INVESTIGATION 145590 POLYMETRICS,INC. $1,262.75 LAB SUPPLIES 145591 POLYPURE,INC. M,660.51 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-92 145592 POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO. $288.99 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 145593 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE S25S.00 ICE 1455N PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY $1,687.04 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145595 RBC TRANSPORT DYNAMICS $625.90 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145596 RD SYSTEMS,INC. $701.01 CARD READER REPAIRS 145597 RJN COMPUTER SERVICES,INC. $5,490.21 TRAINING REGISTRATION-CRAMS TRAINING 145S98 R&RINSTRUMENTS S302S7 INSTRUMENT PARTS 145M DR.SHIVAJI RAMAUNGAM $228.23 LAB SUPPLIES (` FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE MIMS PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMSPAID06128195 POSTINGDATEOMS95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 145600 RISEN MARINE STUDIES,INC. $720.00 OCEAN MONITORING 145601 REMEDYTEMP 53,924.98 TEMPORARY PERSONNEL SERVICES 145602 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $1.379.11 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 145603 ROMAC SUPPLY COMPANY $60614 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 145604 RYAN-HERCO $211.41 PUMP 145805 SAFETY WEST $570.43 INSTRUMENT PARTS 145608 SANOR BIO-INDUSTRIES $3,464.45 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145607 SAWA FE PACIFIC PIPELINE $2W.38 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145608 SANWA BANK $14,456.38 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION-14-1-1A 14MM SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTL E185,484.22 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6 041 145510 R.CRAIG SCOTT&ASSOC. $3.108.58 LEGAL SERVICES-PERSONNEL ISSUES 145611 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $598.07 SPECIALTY GASES 145512 SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS,INC. $358.00 LAB SUPPLIES 14013 SEA COAST DESIGNS 5986.07 OFFICE FURNITURE rn 145614 SHURELUCK SALES $2.838.12 TOOL501ARDWARE X 145615 SKALAR,INC. S227J9 LAB SUPPLIES = 145616 SKYLINE DISPLAYS &31.94 TRAINING MATERIALS b~U 145617 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $490.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 145618 M.LEE SMITH PUBLISHERS $487.W SUBSCRIPTION 145619 SMITH PIPE&SUPPLY $289.11 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 145620 - SO CALIF.EDISON 0O. $45.615.17 POWER Dj 145621 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. SU4,248A3 NATURALGAS LJl 145022 SOUTHERNCOUNTIESOILCO. $8.982.83 DIESEWNLEADED FUEL 145623 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER 52,837.06 DRINKING WATERICOOLER RENTALS 145624 WESTALLOY,INC. $74.07 WELDING SUPPLIES 145625 SPECIAL PLASTIC SYSTEMS,INC. $16824 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 14MM SPEX INDUSTRIES,INC. $192.70 LABSUPPLIES 145627 SPIVECO,INC. E1,940.95 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145628 STONE CONTAINER CORP. $5,00530 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145629 SUPELCO,INC. SIME5 LAB SUPPLIES 146630 SUPERB ONE-HOUR PHOTO $12.21 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 145631 TON ASSOCIATES $822.20 LAB SUPPLIES 14032 TAC WEST,INC. $1.210.51 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 14W33 TEKORAULICS $9.051.17 PUMP PARTS 146634 TELE-CELL,INC. $201.17 COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES 145535 TEXAS COMMERCE BANK 56,503.12 COP TRUSTEE SERVICES 14MM THOMPSON PUBLISHING GROUP $207.00 PUBLICATION 145637 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $728.85 MECHANICAL PARTS 145638 TOWS LOCK&SAFE SERVICE $199.35 LOCKS&KEYS 145639 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES $2,503.50 TRAVEL SERVICES M.O.".94 145640 TRIPLE M PACKING $8.192.27 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145641 TROPICAL PIMA NURSERY,INC. $4,MAS CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.O.5-11-94 14 12 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. EBB5.89 TRUCK PARTS 145843 TRUESDAIL LABS $99.00 LAB SERVICES 145644 JG TUCKER&SON,INC. $271.84 FILTERS 145646 U.S.C.SPONSORED PROJECTS ACCT. $14.396.08 TECHNICAL SERVICES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6 IMS PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID DISMISS POSTING DATE O6120195 WARRANT NO. VENDOR 145646 ULTRASCIENTIFIC $153.00 LAB SUPPLIES 145647 UNISOURCEWOR BUTLER PAPER $9.126.31 OFFICE SUPPLIES 145MB VWR SCIENTIFIC 54,057.23 LAB SUPPLIES 145US VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $5.780.12 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 145650 VALLEY CREST LANDSCAPE,INC. $2,D24.00 LANDSCAPING EQUIPMENT 14MI VALLEY VIEW SHOPPING CENTER 3235.11 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145652 VARIAN ASSOCIATES,INC. $730.85 LAB SUPPLIES 145653 WEFTEC'95 $880.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION-WEF ANNUAL CORR 145654 WALKER CUSTOM POWDER COATING 5232.16 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145655 GUY L.WARDEN B SONS $1,082.02 ENGINE PARTS 145858 WAXIE $380.94 JANITORIALSUPPLIES 145657 WEBBER AIRCRAFT,INC. $3.191.00 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145658 WESTAMERICANRUBBERCO. $2,518.W REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145659 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY 534,716.02 CAUSTIC SODA&HYPOCHLORIDE M.O.8-12-92&4.13-94 f1l 145680 WEST.LITESUPPLYCO. $4,494.5E ELECTRIC SUPPLIES x 145861 WESCO $3,509.35 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES = 14WU WILLAMETTE INDUSTRIES,INC. $247.21 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145563 WILLOWICK ROYAL MOBILEHOME $1.201.17 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT bbOO 145W WTTEG $162.43 LAB SUPPLIES 145M XEROX CORP. 57.50 .72 COPIER LEASES 145668 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $1.020.19 LAB SUPPLIES b 145667 RICIARD B.EDGAR $200.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION $1.865,133.09 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE B121/95 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 08128195 POSTING DATE MOMS SUMMARY AMOUNT 01 OPER FUND $576.03 XI CONSTR.FUND 3951.00 02 OPER FUND 2,467.80 X2 CAP FAC FUND 3,45B.51 02 CONSTR.FUND 3,282.50 X3 OPER FUND 10,979.03 03 CAP FAC FUND 388p80.89 03 CONSTR.FUND 2,T75.00 05OPERFUND 5AW.35 XS CONSTR.FUND 870.50 XB OPER FUND 238.01 XB CAP FAC FUND 808.00 X X0 CONSTR.FUND 538.50 = W OPEN FUND 12,258.28 X7 CAP FAG FUND 8,745.72 X7 CONSTR.FUND 895.50 X11 OPER FUND 2AWA2 X11 CAP FAC FUND 89,335.42 n X11 CONSTR.FUND 007.00 V 014 OPER FUND 15.24 014 CAP FAC FUND 359,356.92 XSMM CAP FAC FUND 892.93 097 OPER FUND 211.12 07814 OPER FUND 785.58 JT OPER FUND 615.471.98 CORE 70.768.59 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND 41,882.03 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL 255,884.00 / 1,885,133.09 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/05/95 PAGE 1 REPORTNUMBERAP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07/12MS POSTING DATE 07/12/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 145731 ABB SERVICE CO. $4,690.94 MACHINE REPAIRS 145732 AFCEA INTERNATIONAL HDORTS. $290.00 COMPUTER TRAINING REGISTRATION 145733 AG TECH COMPANY $73,346.83 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10.9.91 1457M AOX CORPORATION $1,306.54 GAUGE 145735 AT&T-PROWATTS $2,560.76 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 145738 AT&T-MEGACOM SERVICE S987.80 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 145737 AT&T-UNIPLAN SERVICE S36.77 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 145738 ACTION DOOR REPAIR CORP. $587.64 DOOR REPAIRS 145739 ADVANCED WELDER REPAIR $358.06 WELDER REPAIRS 145740 AIR COLD SUPPLY,INC. $164.51 AIR CONDITIONER PARTS 145741 ALLOY DIE CASTING $82.56 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145742 ALPHA OMEGA $373.92 LAB REPAIRS 145743 AMERICATA $441.69 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 1457" AMERICAN SIGMA S2,145.38 SAMPLER PARTS m 145745 BLAKE P.ANDERSON $151.24 REIMBURSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE X 145740 ANIXTER-DISTRIBUTION $295.45 OFFICE EQUIPMENT = 145747 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $1.733.33 NOTICES&ADS �--� 145740 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) S503.20 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 145749 ARMOR-VAC $1.140.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 145750 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SEW. $105.W WASTE OIL REMOVAL hl 145751 - ASSOCIATED CONCRETE PRODUCTS $110,90 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 1 1457V RANDOLPH AUSTIN CO. $633.93 LAB SUPPLIES I--' 145753 AWARDS&TROPHIES $25.27 PLAQUES 145754 BFI MEDICAL WASTE SYSTEMS $43.W WASTE DISPOSAL 14570 BATTERY SPECIALTIES S430.27 BATTERIES 14570 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. 53,567.90 LAB SUPPLIES 145757 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. 5250.05 TRUCK WASH TICKE7S 145758 BISHOP COMPANY $839.17 TOOLS 145759 BLOOMBERG LP. $4.832.59 FINANCIAL MONITORING M.O.i14-93 146760 BOOT BARN $123.80 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 145761 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. S666.17 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES / 145M C.LTECHNOLOGY E720.0D GAS ANALYSIS SERVICES METED CS COMPANY $1.412.24 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 145764 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC DATE $424.05 SERVICE AGREEMENT 14570 CALLAN ASSOCIATES,INC. $25,011 INVESTMENTADVISOR SEARCH M.0.2-M5 145M CANUS CORPORATION $1,057.24 FIBER OPTIC CABLE 145767 JOHN D.CASE&ASSOC. $2.436.22 CONSULTING SERVICES 145788 CENTURY SAFETY INST.&SUPPLY $1,593.60 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 145769 CHEM SEARCH SSW.33 PIPING PARTS 145770 COAST RUBBER STAMP $51.72 OFFICE SUPPLIES 145771 COSTAL VIDEO COMMUNICATION $1C0.55 SAFETY FILM RENTALS 145772 COMPUSA,INC. $132.11 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 145773 COMPUSERVE SGUA4 COMPUTER SERVICES 145774 CONSOLIDATED REPOGRAPHICS S89.13 PRINTING SERVICES 1457/5 CONSUMER PIPE SIp58.51 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 145776 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC. $735.48 TOOLS (1` FUNONO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7105195 PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMSPAID07/12A5 POSTING DATE O7/IM5 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 145777 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO. $870.W CHLORINE NLOA1 11.93 145778 CONTROL CONCEPTS CORP. SW1.83 ELECTRIC PARTS 145779 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS O C $1,3W.65 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SERVICES M.0.8-11-93 1457M COUNTERPART ENTERPRISES $5W.M MECHANICAL PARTS 145781 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $898.72 ELECTRIC PARTS 145702 CHARLES P.CROWLEY,CO. $818.61) PUMP PARTS 145783 DOUGIAS J.DAVIS&ASSOC.,INC. $3,000.00 SAFETY EVALUATION SERVICES 1457M DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIF. $39,154.02 DENTAL INSURANCE PLAN MO.1.12-N 145785 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $1,329.92 SERVICE AGREEMENT 145788 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY 594D.W ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 145787 ROBERT F.DRIVER ASSOC. $21,662.00 PERSONNEL INSURANCE CONSULTANT 145786 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $2.022.38 PAINT SUPPLIES 145789 ESP NORTH $1,968.82 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 145790 EASTMAN.INC. $5.U7.03 OFFICE SUPPLIES m 145791 ECOANALYSIS,INC. 51,028.50 CONSULTING SERVICES X 145792 ELECTRO TEST.INC. $9.990.W METER s 146793 EMERGENCYMGMTNETWORK win SAFETY SUPPLIES 1457N ENCHANTER,INC. $1.680.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.&1&92 145795 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $760.50 LAB SERVICES -1 145796 ERNSTSYOUNG SW,874.00 FINANCE 9 TECH.SERVICES REVIEWS M.O9-14-94 m 146797 EVENTUS SOFTWARE $1,777.10 COMPUTER SOFTWARE I 145798 FLUID TECH.SALES $01746 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES N 145799 FNWVALVECOMPANY $8W.46 VALVES 145M FST SAND AND GRAVEL.INC. $166.39 ROADSASEMATERIALS 145801 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $7.972.50 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.104491 145802 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $339.10 AIR FREIGHT 145W3 FIBERTRON $99SM FIBER OPTIC CABLE 1458N FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $3.WS.M LAB SUPPLIES 145805 FISIONS INSTRUMENTS $41.95 LAS SUPPLIES 14MM FLICKINGER CO. $444.44 VALVES 145807 FLO-SYSTEMS INC. $36.246.62 PUMP PARTS / 145808 FOUNTAINVALLEY CAMERA $38.40 PHOTOSUPPLIES 1455DD FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT SMI.23 PAINT SUPPLIES 145810 FRY'S ELECTRONICS $472.98 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 145811 EST.INC. $2,680.61 OFFICE SUPPLIES 145812 CITY OF GARDEN GROVE 52.IM.00 MANHOLE ADJUSTING 145813 GENERAL BINDING CORP. $1.725.14 OFFICE SUPPLIES 145814 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $650.53 ELECTRIC PARTS 145815 GENERALTELEPHONECO. 51,049.117 TELEPHONE SERVICES 145816 GIERLICHMITCHELL,INC. $1,612.93 PUMP PARTS 145817 GOVT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOC. 51,250.W PUBLICATIONS 145818 WW GRAINGER,INC. $924.79 HARDWARE 145819 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $1,486.95 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 145820 GRASSYS.T.I. 53.357.99 ENGINE PARTS 145821 DAVID R.GRIFFIN $118,449.45 LEGAL SERVICES-TECHRE PIPE M.0.11,14-94 145822 HUTCH 9 KIRK,INC. $757.83 MECHANICAL PARTS FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7AI5195 PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07/12/05 POSTING DATE 0711M5 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 145823 PL HAWN CO,INC. $607.62 FILTERS 145824 HELPMATES PERSONNEL SERVICES $81SM TEMPORARY PERSONNEL SERVICES 145825 HEWLETT PACKARD CO. S1d.39 LAB SUPPLIES 145828 HILTI,INC. $1,198.04 TOOLS 145027 HOME DEPOT $437.21 HARDWARE 145028 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $98.95 HARDWARE 145529 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $15,792.75 WATER USE 145830 HUNTINGTON SUPPLY $24.24 HARDWARE 145831 HYCLONE LABORATORIES,INC. $555.08 LAB SUPPLIES 145832 IPCO SAFETY $1,418.44 SAFETY SUPPLIES 14033 IMAGING PLUS.INC. 5885.53 OFFICE SUPPLIES 140M IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $95.542.33 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.D.11-1 SA2 145835 INDUSTRIAL SAFETY SHOE CO. $3.381.97 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 14MM INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $135.12 CONNECTORS m 145837 IWL HOUSE OF PANCAKES 0 $128.69 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT y� 1458M INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $1,159.45 BATTERIES 2 145W9 INTERSPIRO $912A2 SAFETY SUPPLIES 14SUO IRVINE PHOTO GRAPHICS $27.08 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES to 145MI IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $5.54 WATER USE -1 145842 AT COMPUTER SOURCE,INC. $2.048.88 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 145543 JAMISON ENGINEERING $4,651.&1 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 145844 GREATWESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY. $790.27 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES W 145545 JOBS AVAILABLE S220.00 NOTICES BADS 145845 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $070.21 ELECTRIC PARTS 145047 KIMMERLE BROS,INC. $T55.72 PUMP 145848 KING BEARING,INC. $1.453.03 MACHINE SUPPLIES 145849 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $1,078.38 TOOLS 145OW L A CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. S915.80 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES 145851 LATRONICS $814.11 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT f45852 LAIDLAW ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES $15,957.55 WASTE DISPOSAL SERVICES 145853 LEHMAN BROTHERS,INC. $129.306.30 TCCP INTEREST M.0.1.2-94 1 145854 LOS ANGELES TIMES $170.20 SUBSCRIPTION 145855 MBC APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL $972.05 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.9-1G92 1450M MPS $93.75 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 14507 MACTEMPS $300,00 TEMPORARY PERSONNEL SERVICES 145858 MAG SYSTEMS $847.27 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 145859 MAGNETEK $3.318.82 ELECTRIC METER 1458M MANLEYS BOILER REPAIR CO,INC. $325.00 BOILER CLEANING 145061 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $500.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 145082 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $187,078.00 CONSTRUCTION P242.2 145003 MARIE CALLANDERS PIES 341 $135.00 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 145884 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $235.35 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 145W5 MCCOY SHEET METAL WORKS,INC. $172.40 FITTINGS 145M MIDWAY MFG.S MACHINING $883.55 PUMP PARTS 145857 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3,240.44 UNIFORM RENTALS 145888 MITCHELLINSTRUMENTCO. $190.00 ELECTRIC PARTS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7MMIS PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07/12MS POSTING DATE 07/12/95 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 145889 MORELAND&ASSOCIATES $9,977.50 FINANCIAL AUDIT SERVICES M.O.34L95 145870 MOTOROLA.INC. $372.041 INSTRUMENTPARTS 145871 NAT WEST MARKETS $750.00 C.O.P.LIQUIDITY FEES 145872 NATIONAL ENVIRO.INFO.SERV. $161.50 LABSUPPLIES 145873 NEAL SUPPLY CO. S1,9N.08 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 145874 NEUTRON $7,024.40 ANIONIC POLYMER M.O.S-IDN 145075 NEW HORIZONS COMPUTER CENTER $2,000.00 COMPUTER TRAINING REGISTRATION 145876 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $36,90 WATERUSE 145577 CUMMINS CAL FACIONAN $19D.74 ELECTRIC PARTS 14507E ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $7,139.30 ELECTRIC PARTS 145879 ORANGE COURIER $152.55 COURIER SERVICES 145ND ORANGE VALVE&FITTING 0O. $1,168.09 FITTINGS 145051 OXYGEN SERVICE $1,555.70 SPECIALTY GASES 145802 PSSI $2,325.15 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION m 145883 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY 5640.11 PLUMBING SUPPLIES X 14580a PACIFIC PARTS 531,488.31 FIBER OPTIC EQUIPMENT 2 145885 PACIFIC BELL $4&75 TELEPHONE SERVICES OU 14%86 NORTEL COMMUNICATIONS SYST. $1,089.22 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS 145887 PALLETS&ACCESSORIES CO, $1,544.0 WAREHOUSE SUPPLIES —� 1458H PARAGON CABLE $38.78 CABLE SERVICES 145889 PARKHOUSE TIRE CO. $191.88 TRUCKPARTS 145890 PASCAL&LUDWIG $22.254.00 CONSTRUCTION PI 42&P249 p 145891 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $12,016.51 REIMS,PETTY CASH,TRAINING&TRAVEL 145892 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $279,074.40 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.5-0-91 145893 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS 523,252.4E CMAS COMPUTER HARDWARE/SOFTWARE 145894 POLYPURE.INC. $17,987.19 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11.92 145895 POSTMASTER $172.00 POST OFFICE BOX RENTAL 1458N HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $90.00 ICE 145897 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE IND. $4,412.00 SOIL TESTING 145898 PULSAFEEDER 5482.83 PUMP PARTS 145899 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $103.44 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS / 145M R&R INSTRUMENTS $347.81 INSTRUMENT PARTS 145NI DR.SHIVAJI RAMALINGAM $220.23 LAB SUPPLIES 1459D2 REBIS $11,871.45 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 145903 REMEDYTEMP $754.80 TEMPORARY PERSONNEL SERVICES 1459M MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $74.90 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 145905 RMMEASUREMENTANDCONTROL 59,669.60 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 145M SANTAANA ELECTRIC MOTORS $1,225,30 ELECTRIC PARTS 145907 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $90.45 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 1459M SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $1,10336 SPECIALTY GASES 145M SEA SYSTEMS 31."0A0 CURRENT METER STUDY 145910 SEWER EQUIP CO.OF AMERICA $120337 TOOLS 145911 SHURELUCK SALES $11,907.39 TOOLSRIARDWARE 145912 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO. $130.39 LAB SUPPLIES 145913 THE SMITH GROUP 99,95620 TECHNICAL SERVICES STUDY 145914 SMITH PIPE&SUPPLY INC. $126," PLUMBING SUPPLIES FUND NO 9189 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7105195 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CWMSPAID071IMS POSTING DATE0711Z195 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 145915 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. $53,367.74 POWER 145916 SO.CALIF.WATER CO. 542.23 WATER USE 145917 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. $489.21 DIESEWNLEADED FUEL 145918 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER $13.50 DRINKING WATEPJCOOLER RENTALS 145919 SPARLING INSTRUMENT CO.,INC. $250.00 METER - 145920 SUMMIT STEEL $009.97 METAL 145921 SUNSETFORD $116.35 TRUCK PARTS 145922 SUPELCO,INC. $101.19 LAB SUPPLIES 145923 TARGET $204.27 GROUNDSKEEPING SUPPLIES 145924 TEXMATE,INC. $189.14 INSTRUMENTPARTS 145925 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $240.25 MECHANICAL PARTS 145820 ELIZABETH KYLE THOMPSON $W2.85 LIABILITY CLAIM 145927 TONER SYSTEM INTERNATIONAL $1,020.55 PRINTINGSUPPLIES 145928 TONrS LOCK 8 SAFE SERVICE $96.62 LOCKS 6 KEYS m 145929 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES $2.121.60 TRAVEL SERVICES M.0.6&94 X 145930 TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY.INC. $3,973.84 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.O.St 1-94 = 145931 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $1,463.67 TRUCK PARTS 1459M TRUESDAIL LABS 83.245.65 LAB SERVICES m 14W33 JO TUCKER&SON,INC. $202.15 INSTRUMENT PARTS --I 1459M TUSTIN DODGE 623.84 TRUCK PARTS 145935 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $197.00 LAB SUPPLIES 1459M UNDERSEA GRAPHICS.INC. E14.000.00 OUTFALL REPAIRS vl 14%37 UNISOURCEWOR BUTLER PAPER 8450.20 OFFICE SUPPLIES 145938 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $1.053.60 PARCEL SERVICES 145939 VWR SCIENTIFIC 8104.09 LAB SUPPLIES 14SWO VERTEX COMPUTER CABLE PRODUCTS SI.053.19 FIBEROFTICCABLE 145941 VILLAGE NURSERIES $69.62 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES F15942 CARLWARRENBCO. $1.209.70 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR 145943 WME 82,081.98 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 145W WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $38.357.15 CAUSTIC SODA 6 HYPOCHLORIDE M.O.6-12.92 6 4-13.94 145%5 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $171.33 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES ) 145946 WESCO $840.45 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 145847 WITEG $291.76 LAB SUPPLIES 145948 ROURKE,WOODRUFF B SPRADLIN 968,54L04 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.2-IM2 145949 XEROX CORP. E759.64 COPIER LEASES 1459W GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $831.21 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 14NSI YORBA ORANGE GROWERS ASSOC. 81,686.36 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 0711MS 91,840,22619 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 7MMS PAGES REPORT NUMBERAP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07112/95 POSTING DATE D7H2195 SUMMARY AMOUNT 01 CONSTR FUND $89.45 02 OPER FUND 2.676.67 02 CAP FAC FUND 296.64 82 CONSTR FUND 196.88 83 OPER FUND 31,505.08 93 CAP FAC FUND 137.773.85 03 CONSTR FUND 212.78 05OPERFUND 4,547.37 85 CONSTR FUND 83.81) 06 CONSTR FUND 51.9D 07 OPER FUND M70.64 m 07 CONSTR FUND 73.56 X 811 OPER FUND 828.31 = 011 CAP FAC FUND 1,909.00 m 011 CONSTR FUND 64.28 013 CONSTR FUND 2.55 -1 614 CAP FAC FUND 32.00 Tb 014 CONSTR FUND 14.96 1 0%S OPER FUND 2,W3.04 87514 OPEN FUND 20,543.13 J<OPER FUND 938,231.86 cow 287,789.41 SELFFUNDED INSURANCE FUND 71.M9.57 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL 13g887.36 $1,610,226.19 STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, 1 hereby certify that the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 held on o7(e 19�was duly posted for public inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on a , 192.r IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand thisegv_ day of 1 s 9,T Penny Kyl eriV ) ry of each of the Boards of recto rectyb of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14 of Orange County, California BWF m,F2]A