HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-07-26 o+P\tPl F
f COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
T� pV 10844 ELLIS. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018
II (714)962-2411
July 21, 1995
NOTICE OF MEETING
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
NOS. 1. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
WEDNESDAY JULY 26. 1995 - 7:30 P.M.
DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
The Regular Meeting of the Joint Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, will be held at the
... above location, time and dale.
Board Secret
Tentatively-Scheduled Upcoming Meetings:
AD HOC COMMITTEE RE SPACE
UTILIZATION STUDY FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE EMPLOYEES - Tuesday, July 25, 1995, at 5:30 p.m.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
A ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
10944 ELLIB AVENUE
NO.BOX 8127 I
FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA BS 2)
014)M2.2411
JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES
Executive Committee Meetinas Joint Board Meetinas
July Jul 19, 1995 Jul 26, 1995
August None Scheduled Aug 23, 1995
September Sep 20, 1995 Sep 27, 1995
October Oct 18, 1995 Oct 25, 1995
November None Scheduled Nov 15, 1995
December None Scheduled Dec 13, 1995
January Jan 17, 1996 Jan 24, 1996 1
February Feb 21, 1996 Feb 28, 1996
March Mar 20, 1996 Mar 27, 1996
April Apr 17, 1996 Apr 24, 1996
May May 15, 1996 May 22, 1996
June Jun 19, 1996 Jun 26, 1996
July Jul 17, 1996 Ju124, 1996
�a1.'
AGENDA
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708
REGULAR MEETING
JULY 26, 1995 - 7:30 P.M.
In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this
i agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the Districts' Administrative Offices not less I
than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to
each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary.
In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Boards
ifor discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an I
emergency item or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the {
attention of the Districts subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a
I supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date.
......_............—.._.._..—................................._.._.._.._.._..._..._.._..-.._......_................
_.._.._.._.._.._._...I
(1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation
(2) Roll call
(3) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating
to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders)
(4) Appointment of Chair pro tem, if necessary
(5) Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Boards on specific agenda items
or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair,
speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks
may be limited to five minutes.
Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda
cannot have action taken by the Boards of Directors except as authorized by Section
54954.2(b).
07126/95
(6) The Joint Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on
miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for
information only and require no action by the Directors.
(a) Report of Joint Chair, consideration of Resolutions or commendations,
presentations and awards
(b) Report of General Manager
(c) Report of General Counsel
(7) (a) Annual election of Joint Chair: (Nominee: Director John C. Cox, Jr.)
(b) Nomination and election of Vice Joint Chair
(8) EACH DISTRICT
ACTION: If no corrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will be
deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair.
District 1 - June 28, 1995 regular
District 2 - June 28, 1995 regular
District 3 - June 28, 1995 regular
District 5 - June 28, 1995 regular
District 6 - June 28, 1995 regular
District 7 - June 28, 1995 regular
District 11 - June 28, 1995 regular
District 13 - June 28, 1995 regular
District 14 - June 28, 1995 regular
(9) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and
individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will
be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a
desire to vote differently for any District.)
06/28/95 07/12/95
ALL DISTRICTS
Joint Operating Fund - $615,471.98 $936,231 .86
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 76,756.59 287,789.47
Joint Working Capital Fund - 255,664.00 134,867.36
Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 41,882.03 71,739.57
DISTRICT NO. 1 - 1,527.83 69.45
DISTRICT NO. 2 - 9,208.89 3,372.19
DISTRICT NO. 3 - 381,814.92 169,491 .71
DISTRICT NO. 5 - 5,836.85 4,610.97
DISTRICT NO. 6 - 1,382.51 51.90
DISTRICT NO. 7 - 21,899.48 6,244.42
DISTRICT NO. 11 - 92,625.24 2,801 .59
DISTRICT NO. 13 - 0.00 2.55
DISTRICT NO. 14 - 359,372.16 46.98
DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 692.93 2,363.04
DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 211 .12 0.00
DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 786.56 20,543.13
$1 ,865,133.09 $1 ,640,226.19
-2-
07/26/95
(10) CONSENT CALENDAR- ITEMS 1001 THROUGH 10(fl
All matters placed on the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further
explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar
by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate
i discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action
j approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent
1 calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order
j of business.
Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon
recognition by the chair, stale their name, address and designate by letter the item to be
i removed from the consent calendar. l
i The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. I
L......................................._.._.._.._.._....._.._.._.._...........................................................................
_.._�
Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not
specifically removed from same, as follows:
ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Consideration of Resolution No. 95-77, receiving and filing bid tabulation and
recommendation and awarding contract for Purchase of Anionic Polyelectrolyte
Chemical Polymer, Specification No. C-035, to Polypure, Inc. for the price of$1.69 per
pound, plus sales tax, for a one year period beginning August 1, 1995, with provision
for four one-year extensions (Estimated annual cost $161,699.20 plus sales tax).
(b) Consideration of motion authorizing membership in the Southern Califomia Alliance of
Publicly Owned Treatment Works (SCAP) for the 1995-96 fiscal year.
DISTRICT 2
(c) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications
for Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-R1, authorizing
an addition of$98,030.23 to the contract with Colich Bros., Inc. dba Colich & Sons, for
four items of additional work, and granting a time extension of eight calendar days for
completion of said additional work.
DISTRICTS 3& 11
(d) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim of Colich Bros., Inc. dba Colich
& Sons received June 21, 1995, in the amount of$300,208.22, plus unspecified
additional expenses and legal expenses, for a fuel spill in connection with Slater
Avenue Pump Station, Contract No. 11-17-1, and refer to the Districts' General Counsel
and liability claims administrator for appropriate action.
-3-
07/26/95
(10) DISTRICTS 5 & 6
(a) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications
for Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3, Contract
No. 5-37-3, for an addition of$60,458.08 to the contract with Wal-Con Construction
Company for two items of additional work, and granting a time extension of 60 calendar
days for completion of said additional work.
DISTRICT 7
(f) Consideration of the following actions relative to Master Plans prepared by Boyle
Engineering Corporation for Lemon Heights Sewer System, Contract No. 7-16, Orange
Park Acres Sewer System, Contract No. 7-18, and Cowan Heights Sewer System,
Contract No. 7-19:
(1) Consideration of motion to receive and file Master Plan for Lemon Heights
Sewer System, Contract No. 7-16.
(2) Consideration of motion to receive and file Master Plan for Orange Park Acres
Sewer System, Contract No. 7-18.
(3) Consideration of motion to receive and file Master Plan for Cowan Heights
Sewer System, Contract No. 7-19.
v
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
(11) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any
-4-
07/26/95
(12) ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Minutes of the Executive Committee
(1) Receive and file draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on
June 28, 1995.
(2) Receive and file draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services
Committee Minutes for the meeting held on July 5, 1995.
(3) Receive and file draft Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization Study for
Administrative Employees Minutes for the meeting held on July 6, 1995.
(4) Receive and file draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for
the meeting held on July 6, 1995.
(5) Receive and file draft Finance, Administration and Human Resources
Committee Minutes for the meeting held on July 12, 1995.
(6) Receive and file draft Executive Committee Minutes for the meeting held on
July 19, 1995.
(b) Consideration of the following actions recommended by said committees:
(1) OMT895-036 Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to
enter into an Engineering Feasibility Studies Agreement with Southern California
Edison "ENVEST° Program to study energy conservation measures at the
Districts'treatment plants, for an amount not to exceed $30,000.
(2) OMTS95-038 Consideration of the following actions relative to Addendum No. 4
to the Professional Services Agreement with Ernst &Young, providing for
additional services for the development of documentation and training for
conducting process improvement analysis of key programs within the Technical
Services Department, as follows:
(a) Consideration of motion to receive and file OMTS Committee certification
of the final negotiated fee with Ernst & Young for said services.
(b) Consideration of Resolution No. 95-79, approving Addendum No. 4 to
said agreement with Ernst & Young for said additional services, for an
additional amount not to exceed $20,000.00, increasing the total
authorized compensation from an amount not to exceed $453,000.00 to
an amount not to exceed $473,000.00.
(3) PDC95-24 Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a purchase order
to Pioneer-Standard Electronics for the Purchase of Two VAX 4000 Model 705A
Computers for Plant No. 2 Plant Automation for the Ocean Outfall Booster
Station (Specification No. E-257), in an amount not to exceed $357,266.95 plus
tax.
.5-
[ITEM (12) CONTINUED ON PAGE 6]
07/26/95
(12) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 5)
(b) (4) PDC95-25 Consideration of motion authorizing the Ad Hoc Committee re Space
Utilization Study to solicit, negotiate, award and issue purchase orders to
various vendors for Modifications to the Existing Interior Office Space in the
Administration Building for General Management, Administration and
Communications Offices, Specification No. E-256, in an amended amount not to
exceed $130,000.00.
(5) FAHR95-31 Consideration of Resolution No. 95-78, adopting Investment
Performance Review Guidelines for the Districts' Investment Program.
(6) FAHR95-32 Consideration of the following changes to the IRS-Approved
Section 457 Deferred Compensation Plan:
(a) Consideration of Resolution No. 95-80, approving amendment to
Deferred Compensation Plan for Officers and Employees, providing for
greater flexibility in plan distribution elections, clarify certain provisions of
the Plan, and comply with certain recent Internal Revenue Service
interpretations.
(b) Consideration of Resolution No. 95-81, approving amended Deferred
Compensation Program for Executive Management Group Employees
and Management, Professional and Supervisory Employees.
(7) FAHR95-34 Consideration of Resolution No. 95-82, approving Amendment
No. 13 to Agreement for Employment of General Counsel.
(8) EXEC95-01 Consideration of the following actions relative to Consolidation of
the Districts:
(a) Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Report dated July 14,
1995, regarding consolidation of the nine separate districts.
(b) Consideration of Resolution No. 95-83, approving consolidation of the
nine separate districts into one single sanitation district; with a single
board of directors made up of one representative each for every city,
sanitary district, water district and unincorporated portion of the county
within the sanitation districts' service area and now represented on one
or more of the existing nine sanitation districts
(c) Consideration of motion directing staff to initiate all steps necessary,
including the LAFCO process, to complete a reorganization of the nine
separate districts into one district.
-6-
[ITEM (12) CONTINUED ON PAGE 7)
r
07/26/95
(12) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 6)
(b) (9) EXEC95-03 Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to
employ Judith Wilson at the top of the salary range for the position of Assistant
General Manager-Administration.
(10) EXEC95-04 Consideration of motion to receive and file the Finance Function
Review- Final Report prepared by Ernst & Young.
(13) ALL DISTRICTS
Update by Staff and Consultants concerning developments related to the County's
Commingled Investment Pool.
(14) ALL DISTRICTS
i i
CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on
this agenda as a regular meeting of the Boards,the Chair may convene the
I Boards in closed session to consider matters of pending or potential litigation, or j
personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9, 54957 or I
54957.6. 1
' Reports relating to(a) purchase and sale of real property; (b)matters of 1
pending or potential litigation;(c)employment actions or negotiations with I
employee representatives;or which are exempt from public disclosure under
the California Public Records Act,may be reviewed by the Boards during a
permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. Al such
time as final actions are taken by the Boards on any of these subjects,the
minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information.
I
(a) Convene in closed session, if necessary
(b) Confer with Special Counsel R. Craig Scott &Associates re status of litigation, Louis
Sangermano v. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County.
(c) Reconvene in regular session
(d) Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session
(15) ALL DISTRICTS
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(16) ALL DISTRICTS
Matters which a Director would like staff to report on at a subsequent meeting
(17) ALL DISTRICTS
Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff report
-7-
07/26/95
(18) DISTRICT 1
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(19) DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(20) DISTRICT 2
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(21) DISTRICT2
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(22) DISTRICT 3
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(23) DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(24) DISTRICT 5
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(25) DISTRICT 5
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(26) DISTRICT 6
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(27) DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(28) DISTRICT 7
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(29) DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(30) DISTRICT 11
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(31) DISTRICT 11
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(32) DISTRICT 13
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(33) DISTRICT 13
Consideration of motion to adjourn
-8-
07/26/95
(34) DISTRICT 14
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(35) DISTRICT 14
Consideration of motion to adjourn
NOTICE TO DIRECTORS: To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Joint
j Boards, Directors shall submit items to the Board Secretary not later than the close of business 14
j days preceding the Joint Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on the agenda all items j
submitted by Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and all formal communications.
Board Secretary: Penny Kyle (714) 962-2411, ext. 2026 i
Secretary: Patricia L. Jonk (714) 962-2411, ext. 2029
_9-
J:1�WDOOaSAGBTDaM1F7SBSA.07
, II
b COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
�,/ ......�+ P.O. BOX 0127,FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92728.8127
'I I7 p 108"ELLIS,FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708.7018
(714)OW2411
July 20, 1995
To the Chairman and
Members of the Joint Boards of Directors
Subject: Board Letter
The following is an update on some of the things that are happening at the Districts. If you have
questions on any of the items, please give me a call.
Enchanter Boat Tour for Directors
The first of the two boat tours on the Enchanter was held on July 13. The Directors who took
advantage of this opportunity were very impressed with this operation. The second tour is
scheduled for Friday, July 28. If there are any other Directors who are interested, we can
scheduled another tour in August. I would like to encourage as many of you as can make it to
take advantage of this opportunity. Please contact my office if you are interested and indicate
which date is most convenient.
Status Report on the Techite Pine Case
The Techite Pipe trial ended, successfully, after more than eight weeks before the jury. On
Wednesday, June 14, the jury awarded District 3 $147,500 in compensatory damages and
$6,445,000 in punitive damages. We have been advised by Counsel that United Technologies
will be requesting a new trial.
Legislative Update
Attached is a status report from CASA on current goings-on in Sacramento. Please note Item II,
addressing proposals that would affect the Districts, including borrowing or transferring
reserves.
Board Agenda Mailings
While we haven't received all of the questionnaires back regarding changes in mailing policies,
it appears that the consensus is to eliminate the use of three-hole punched paper and send the
entire agenda package only to active Directors, unless specifically requested by an alternate.
As a result of this change, active Directors who cannot attend a meeting should be sure to give
their packages to their alternate.
+ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Chairman and Members of 1ORAA ELUS AVENGE
the Joint Boards of Directors LEY.9A99,2]
�] FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92]29�9+2]
July 20, 1995 mar 982-2992zan
Page 2
Continuing Investigation into the 1994 Fatal Accident at Plant No. 2
Attached is a copy of a letter from our special counsel on the accident at Plant 2, transmitting a
letter from the Office of the District Attorney advising that they have concluded that insufficient
evidence exists to sustain criminal charges. Staff will still be pursuing revisions to the state
report.
Request by Owner for Waiver of Connection Fee in District 2
On May 24, 1995, Mr. Jerome Greubel appeared before the Boards and requested demolition
credit for a parcel on Chapman Avenue in the City of Orange. Under our ordinance, demolition
credit may be applied towards our Capital Facilities Connection Charge if a new building is
started within two (2) years of the demolition of the old building. Mr. Greubel requested this
credit for the Chapman Avenue parcel. He stated that in 1990, the City of Orange condemned a
portion of the parcel for the widening of Chapman Avenue.
Mr. Greubel was not the owner of the parcel when the demolition or condemnation took place.
According to title records, he purchased the property in the last two years. The City of Orange
compensated the owner for the 1990 condemnation. In spite of several requests from staff, we
have not received any information from Mr. Greubel to support the request. If and when we do,
4..' we will place an item on the District No. 2 agenda for consideration by the Board.
Proposed Reduction In EPA's FY 1996 Budget
As you may have read, the House Subcommittee on Appropriations for VA, HUD and
Independent Agencies has proposed a 34 percent reduction in EPA's FY 1996 budget. The bill
also contains a number of legislative "riders"that would curtail or, in some cases, eliminate
EPA's ability to set standards and enforce regulations. As a result, EPA has initialed an
immediate hiring and promotion freeze. Reductions of this magnitude in their opinion would
have a major impact on EPA's ability to perform their responsibilities to protect public health and
to ensure a clean and healthy environment. This may affect further consideration of our
application for a continuance of our 301(h)waiver.
OMITS Committee Tour of Plant No. 2
The OMTS Committee has scheduled a tour of Plant 2 on August 2, 1995, in lieu of the regular
OMITS Committee meeting. All directors are invited to attend. Dinner will be served before the
tour in Conference Room A of the Administration Building, and afterwards the Directors will
board the Districts' bus for the 1-to 1-1/2-hour tour. When the tour ends, the bus will return the
Directors to Plant 1. Please notify Clarice Marcin at 962-2411, extension 3001, no later than
July 28 if you would like to attend.
' COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
Chairman and Members of 10 auS AVENUE
v.o.eozein
the Joint Boards of Directors F(oaTAIN VAu ,,MI NIA 92�e1e7
July20, 1995 mA)seeznr
Page 3
Spill Containment Policy at Work
Attached is a memo dated June 16, 1995 from Nick Arhontes that clearly identifies the need for
a Spill Containment Policy. Staff is to be commended for their ability to work with others to
develop a Spill Containment Policy.
New Addition to General Counsel's Staff
Attached is an announcement that Terry C. Andrus, former County counsel, has joined Rourke,
Woodruff&Spradlin. Mr. Andrus will be developing the firm's personnel/labor relations practice.
Staff Addresses Subcommittee of OC Division of League of California Cities
On Friday, July 7, Blake Anderson and I addressed a Subcommittee on Service Delivery for the
OC Division of the League of California Cities. We were requested to discuss how we are
organized to deliver services; level of operations and governance.
Revision to Travel Policies
At the May 1995 Finance and Personnel Committee Meeting, the Directors reviewed and
recommended changes in the wording of the Travel and Training Policy relative to costs
incurred by retiring or terminating Directors and staff. The following paragraph was approved by
the Committee:
"Training and travel during the final 90 days of service of any Director or employee will
be authorized only in extraordinary circumstances where no alternate attendee is
appropriate. Absent such authorization, all costs will be reimbursed by the Director or
employee.'
Potential Soil Contamination at the Stor-N-Lok Facility adjacent to Plant No. 1
The storage facility at the comer of Garfield and Ward is leased from the Districts. The
agreement is presently being revised providing for additional fees and an extension through
1997. Staff has indicated some concern about the possibility of contamination as a result of
vehicle storage, potential for hazardous waste storage and heavy equipment repair which
sometimes takes place on site by a sub-lessee. After an inspection of the site by our Source
Control Inspector, it appears that the only observable waste on the site was spilled motor oil in
small quantities at several locations.
Status Update on the Security Services Contract
The Request for Proposal (RFP) for the Security Services Control has been advertised and
proposals will be opened on July 25. After staff evaluation the award will be presented to the
4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
41 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
Chairman and Members of
the Joint Boards of Directors 10944 ELLI9 AVENUE
July 20, 1995 v.o 9oA 0127
Page 4 FOUNTAIN VALLEY.fAUFOANIA 9272"127
g n141902-2u1
Directors at the August 23 Board Meeting. Our present security staff will remain onsite through
September 15.
Slater Avenue Pump Station Construction Project
We have an ongoing construction project in the City of Huntington Beach which is Contract No.
11-17-1, Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements. This $5.7 million
contract consists of constructing a new pump station, installing new sewage force mains and
gravity sewer lines, and demolition of the old pump station.
Several problems have been encountered thus far during construction, including delays to the
work due to overly wet conditions during the winter, and running into many undisclosed
underground utilities. One of the current impacts on the local residents will be driving piles for
part of the building foundation. This is a noisy operation which can upset the nearby residents.
We have met with the city staff of Huntington Beach in an effort to smooth out our impacts to the
city residents. We are going to place larger information signs near the project, and will conduct
neighborhood informational meetings to let the residents know the status of the job and to
address any concerns of the residents.
Budget Summary
At the July 26 Board Meeting, a Budget Summary of the 1995-96 Budget will be available for all
Directors. This summary will be given to each employee to explain changes in numbers,
philosophy and employee involvement in controlling and lowering the cost of treatment. I am
meeting with all employees in five separate meetings to discuss the budget and to commence
what will be an ongoing dialogue about benchmarking and their role in cost containment.
County Reorganization
Much has been said about the need to restructure the County services delivery system. The
League of California Cities—Orange County Division has a Super Committee working on this
and the Board of Supervisors has appointed a special Charter Study Commission.
As far as I know, only Supervisor Marian Bergeson has developed a specific proposal which she
calls Orange County 2001. A copy is attached.
Under this proposal, the County would be administered by a mayor elected for a four-year term.
The governing board would be comprised of ten representatives from cities, four others and the
mayor. The operating entity would be called the Orange Regional Services Authority (ORSA)
and would provide services through four divisions:
Health and Human Services
Public Facilities
Public Protection
4d Transportation
All sanitation and water districts would be part of the Public Facilities Division.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
.1 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
EUU AVENUE
Chairman and Members of 10P0 W.s127
v.o. n
the Joint Boards of Directors FOUNTAIN vVALLEY.cnUzomna szozealzv
July 20, 1995 n+nesz.zan
Page 5
Orange County Financial Round Table
Attached are two documents received at the Round Table I attended July 19 entitled The
Orange County Bankruptcy Round Table and Financial and Legal Update.
If you want additional information on any of the items I've addressed in this letter, or past letters,
please give me or Jean a call at 714/962-2411.
Respectfully,
Donald F. McIntyre
General Manager
DFII
J1 W G W OAMiDFMBONN.LTRb]1BY.
Attachments
`ark
07/19/95 17:56:01 -> 7199fiMS6 Donald Mclat,ye Page HHI
JUL-19-95 WED 15:55 P.01
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION of SANITATION AGENCIES
� � 9tELanmr.Soi,e I400 6sv"nmm,OA 9be14 TSL'f93a1446e39a-FAR(9161448-06a9
w^'
July 19, 1995
TO: CASA MEMBER AGENCIES
FROM: Mike Dillon
Bobbi Larson
Christina Dillon
SUBJECTS CAPrrOL UPDATE
I. BUDGET NEGOTIATIONS CONTINUE...
As you have probably been reading in the newspaper, the "Big Six" (Legislative leaders
and the Governor) continue moeting to craft a state budget compromise. Legislative
d employees, both members and staff, are going without pay until a budget is adopted.
Insiders are predicting a budget solution by the end of July. A broad budget outline is
emerging, though major sticking points remain, including welfare and education
funding. The fiscal troubles of Los Angeles County are also being discussed,with
proposals for am revenue sources ranging from additional "sin taxes" to authority to
place a sales lax hike before the voters. At this point,special district property taxes do
not appear to be part of the budget balancing act, but keep reading...
H. THE SOLUTION TO COUNTY FUNDING WOES MAY INVOLVE
BORROWING SPECIAL DISTRICT FUNDS
Rumors abound regarding Icgisladvc efforts to tap special district reserves for loans to
ailing counties. The key legislation so far is AR 16XX by Orange County
AsseSnblymember Curt Pringle. In its current form. AB 16XX authorizes a county
board of supervisors to borrow or transfer money from county enterprise fowls as
long as doing so would not result in a fee increase. The bill originally applied only to
Orange County,but was amended late last month to apply statewide. As now drafted,
AB 16XX would not affect special district revenues.
However, members of the Orange County delegation have discussed amending AR
16XX (or another bill) to allow loans of reserve funds from independent special
districts to counties. Legislators frequently refer to the "bill1ems of dollars" in special
district reserves as a source of funds to help counties; Orange County Supervisor
Marian Bergeson has proposed a county takeover of Orange County Sanitation
-> 71996ZB356 Donald tichd.9re page 802
D7/19/95 17:56:37 P.02
JUL-19-95 IiED 15:56
Districts and the Municipal Water District of Orange County in order to get aces to
the $195 million and $50 million in reserves held by those agencies. Because their
fiscal picture is so gloomy,counties are unable to sell bonds and need another means
of borrowing. Details of a legislative proposal are sketchy-, one Assembly staffer
indicated that the bill would be permissive, requiring both the district and the county
to agree to the loan and allow 10 years for repayment However, there is always the
possibility that the big will authorize the county to borrow the funds without the
consent of the special districts and that the bill will apply statewide, not just to Orange
County.
The coasenam around the capitol is that the legislature will not focus on solving the
Orange County problem until after the state budget is passed. It may be a few weeks
before actual language surfaces. Speaker Doris Allen recently assumed the
Chairmanship of the Select Committee on the Insolvency of Orange County, replacing
Los Angeles Democrat Marguerite Archie-Hudson_ The Committee had been
scheduled to review various Orange County-related legislative proposals at a special
hearing July 27, 1995. It now appears that the hearing may be moved into August.
We will continue to investigate all proposals affecting special district property taxes
and reserves and report developments to you as thcy occur.
.irv�ne
fort ACc u,xS PAV&C,L
POWON. MOOA.liEAD �•� *� n � �,~'��^
tn GOE'Ptm&
Lawyer&
M. Pohleon
(Tl4)58&12
�; A)C 4 Moodmd rA (714) %B-7271
70
Thomas M CactLsle
July 5, 1995
Orange County Sanitation District
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, CA 92728-6127
ATTENTION: Blake Anderson
General Manager
RE: 2/1/94 Industrial Accident
Dear Mr. Anderson:
Enclosed please find a copy of the correspondence I have just
received from the Deputy District Attorney who has been directing
the criminal investigation of the above-referenced accident. As
you can see, this confirms that the criminal investigation has at
long last been closed with no charges filed.
I therefore also enclose what should be my final billing statement
in this matter. Thank you for the opportunity to be of service.
Congratulations on the successful resolution of this aspect of this
tragic accident. Should you have any questions, please do not
hesitate to call.
Very truly yours,
PORLSON, MOORHEAD 6 GOETR7
TR�S ETRAL
/dj
Enclosure
cc: Teri Josway (Via FAX to (714) 962-0427)
Thomas Nixon, Esquire
23151 Moulton Parkway. 8uitc 102 . Laguna Hills, CA 92653
OFFICE OF THE
DISTRICT ATTORNEY
1 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
0FMICHAEL R. CAPIZZI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY
MAURICE L EVANS L7u1V 5 , 1995
CHIEF ASSISTANT
JDNN D.CONLEY _
O PROTON
NAJCROFFENSUS Mr. Thomas M Goethals
JAN J.NOLAN Pohlson, Moorhead & Goethals
DIRECTOR 23151 Moulton Parkway
SUPERIOR COURT Suite 102
BRBJRF.ROMNEv Laguna Hills, CA 92633
DIRECTOR
MUNICIPµ CD'JPT
WALLACE J.WADE
DIRECTOR
SPECIAL opnATIONB Re: Orange County $anitation Di rig
LGRBNW.DSCHBSNE
CHIP
BUREAU OF INVESTIOATION
Dear Mr. Goethalsl
PLEASE RlFLYTO:
..,,// We have completed our investigation into the fire and
LCCENTRAL OFFICE deaths at the Sanitation District' s Huntington Beach
ra
PC eo amN,eR DRw facility on February 1, 1994. Based on our review, we
SWTA ANA.CA 9=1 have concluded that insufficient evidence exists to
p1AI1]4aeM sustain criminal charges related to this tragic
n NOM OFFICE incident. our inquiry is now closed.
181E N.80415 Ave.
FU[URTON.CA 9]e]1
t)+•t mr41B I assume you will notify interested parties at the
District of our conclusions . If you have questions
WNSTOF.lee regarding any aspect of this case, please do not
e+4naTe sTR[eC
WES-1 WBTlP. hesitate to contact me..CA Se01]
R'•'e06-A1 1
SOUTH OFFICE
11141CRGWNYALLSv PNWv. $//1nC//2(y/:2�/1�'`f� .p '—I
IAOUVAN.DUIL CA P3ET •r,'
"S AIAN 1211
GU
NARSOP OFFICE
401 JAMBOREE SLVO. MAITHBW ANDERSON
NEWPORT BEACH CA 9188E
R1414) 4990 Deputy District Attorney
Special Assignments Section
C JUVaJ'Le OFFICE (714) 334-3824
241 CRY DRIVE BDUTA
ORANGE,CA eem
(71419EE'TD84
C MAJOA FRAUD
CONSUMER PROTECTION
408 W.BTH R)RBBT
SURBEM
SANTA ANA.CA w701
171A19941100 l '
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
j 01 ORANGE COUNTY,CAIRORNIA
June 16, 1995 IO EWSAVENUE
P.O.BOX 5121
FOUMAIN VALLEY,CA JFORNIA W2"127
r/14ISB&2 II
MEMORANDUM
TO: Edwin E. Hodges
FROM: Nicholas J. Arhontes
SUBJECT: Sewage Spill of June 6, 1995
Spoon's Restaurant Site - City of Tustin
Due to our continuing efforts in spill containment and anticipating our proposed new
policy (OMTS95-029), I decided to visit the site, assist Division 3340 as much as
possible and critique the event.
I arrived on the scene at Newport Boulevard and sixth street at approximately 6:20 p.m.
Robert Burge of Division 3340 was the standby person on the site. Robert had
established a containment barrier using absorbent booms and dirt from an adjacent
shrub area on Newport Blvd. At approximately 6:00 p.m., Tustin Police Department
(Officer Vallevieni, #661) had contacted the private property owner, The Carlson
Company, advising them of the spill and requesting their on-site assistance. Ms.
Bobbie Frazier of The Carlson Co. arrived at 6:25 p.m. I showed Ms. Frazier the
overflowing manhole in the driveway to the Restaurant/Business Complex. The
overflow was a one-inch high stream coming from a 3/4 inch diameter pick hole. She
advised that they did have a P.M. routine for the property and requested their plumbing
contractor to show up. The plumber never arrived.
An additional standby person was requested on the radio to bring the Combination
Truck for vacuuming up the sewage. John Gonzalez advised Control that it was not
available, as it was in the Auto Shop for scheduled maintenance. Control then
contacted National Plant Services who had a Combination Truck. We requested
Nottingham, since all we needed was a Vacuum Pumper Truck, but Control had no
phone numbers on their list. Nottingham had done an excellent job for us in Seal Beach
recently. I will be fixing this for the next time. National Plant's ETA was about one hour
out of Long Beach. John Gonzalez was advised to bring the Hydroflusher and try to find
some portable pumping equipment so we could pump off the contained sewage to a
nearby manhole. Our containment was approaching full.
Ms. Karen News, Orange County Public Health, arrived, surveyed the scene, our
containment, and then focused on requesting the restaurant operators to stop serving
r
food and to notify tenants of the problem and the possibility of shutting off the water
supply. Ms. Frazier had sewer system drawings in her office, but not with her. She did
advise that the complex was basically divided in thirds and that two additional laterals
drained the other areas. She also advised that the restaurant had a "Grease Trap" on
site. We did not see any signs unless it was interior to the building. We also did not
have any information on the private laterals and how they tie into the City's system. As
you are aware, we maintain the City's system under a contract, but not the laterals.
Adjacent to our containment area was an OCSD 24-inch cover. We decided that to
protect our containment from an overflow, we could use a five-gallon pail and bucket off
a few gallons at a time and dump it into the sewer. Traffic control was adjusted and the
cover was removed. A visual inspection showed a dry line and an approximately 24-
inch diameter pipe leading to the storm drain inlet box our containment was protecting.
Apparently someone on the City staff had allowed some contractor to switch OCSD
covers with storm drain covers on a street paving job or we have a direct connection to
the sewer system. We decided bucketing sewage to the storm drain was a bad idea.
Shortly after 7:00 p.m., John Gonzalez arrived with the Hydroflusher and began filling
the holding tank. Still, no sign of the contract plumber. Trouble shooting sewer systems
in the field without drawings is difficult, especially under heavy traffic conditions. At
about 7:10 p.m., we opened a manhole.on Newport and San Juan and found it to be a
turn point routing local flow easterly on San Juan. Visible was a channel with very little
flow from the direction of the overflowing manhole. The flusher hose was sent up the
lateral where it broke through a heavy blockage. Heavy grease and gritty/sludgy debris
was visible. The overflow stopped and normal conditions were reestablished. I
requested that the crew continue to flush the private system up to the clean-out riser
adjacent to the building (Spoons). If there was a grease trap, it appeared to be
nonfunctional and if there was a maintenance program by the property owner it missed
this connection to the City-owned system.
Ms. Newe of Orange County Public Health was informed of our activities and findings,
and began to notify the various tenants of the resolution of the problem. We advised
her that restaurant grease is becoming a major cause of blockages.
At about 7:35 p.m., National Plant Services arrived with their Combination Truck and a
two-man crew. They setup within our traffic control at the containment area and began
vacuuming up the sewage. Our crew performed a wash down of the private manhole,
clean-out riser and surface area around the manhole. These activities were witnessed
by Spoons' staff and David Grimaldo of Preferred Property Maintenance. The gutter
was then washed down using the street flusher feature of our Hydro Flusher. The
absorbent booms were squeezed out and hauled back to the plant and eventually
disposed of in the rag bin. All of the rinse waters were contained and vacuumed up.
The last step of the clean up was the vacuuming up of the dirt and mud used for the
containment, then a small rinse of the containment zone. National Plant completed its
2of3
work about 8:25 p.m. Our staff escorted them to a nearby trunk manhole to discharge
U their liquids and silt.
Polaroid photos were taken and are available for review.
I found Division 3340's spill response to be more than adequate considering obstacles
they faced and our current containment strategy to be effective.
Areas for improvement:
1. We could utilize small portable trash pumps for containment pump-off back to the
local sewer.
2. Area maps of the City of Tustin are inadequate. We don't even have the City's
construction drawings on site.
3. We should back charge the property owners for the response effort for
discharging grease to the sewer. Costs were allocated to 00708-0-00, including
my time.
4. Local cities should have sewer plans available for private business/industrial
complexes for troubleshooting purposes. I believe they all have access to
structure drawings for fire fighting purposes.
5. Additional training and materials for Division 3340's staff on containment
strategies and continuous training.
6. Continuous review and update of our emergency contractor/service firm list(s).
7. Cellular phones for field use to improve communications between the Control
Center staff, suppliers and field crews and not impact the Plant radio system.
8. Workshops with the member cities and agencies to identify roles and
responsibilities in SSO (Sanitary Sewer Overflow) events.
9. Outreach by Source Control/Compliance to the restaurant industry on SSO
issues.
NJA:cm
RiWPOOLlW1WJJ pill&K
c: B. Anderson
K Ramey (3340)
M. McCusker
"' 3of3
LAW OFFICES OF
ROIIRBEF WOODRUFF & SPRADLIN
Rr e. Dlxx,xo .nwermnioNnl—PORwmN MU PHONE la,al 558-1000
M. LO,S BORAX SUITE 7000 PAGR.MILL 11I41 BObTpBT
/COAX e. C n o. vARnlxARRIM oTOiox 701 SOUTH PARKER STREET
PRE.R. O ORANGE, CALIFORNIA 0256B
JOSEPH W.
F AT X
.1...
Fvner WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL NUMBER
PETTY C. NUMBERT... 1CN
F.. .1...
JAMES W. PARKER
JANES O. ROURXE
JONx R. RN.w July 6, 1995
KENKARD R. SMART. JR.
....
DANIEL K. SPRA04w
M R. wA1.
TNOMAS L. WOODRUFF
Rourke, Woodruff& Spradlin is pleased to announce that Terry C. Andrus, former County
Counsel for the County of Orange, will be joining our firm. Mr. Andrus is currently on a brief
holiday and will join Rourke, Woodruff& Spradlin approximately July 18.
Mr. Andrus is a highly respected public law attorney with broad and deep experience in
both litigation and advisory matters. During the 21 years he served in the County Counsel's
office, including four years as the County Counsel, he has dealt with virtually every element
of public law. We anticipate that Mr. Andrus will focus on developing the firm's
personnel/labor relations practice.
y� Terry Andrus leaves his position as County Counsel with the uniform praise of the members
of the Board of Supervisors, the County Chief Executive Officer, leaders of the employee
unions and interested observers of county government. This is a remarkable testimony to
both his skill in dealing with specific problems raised by the County's financial crisis and the
broad scope of his exemplary skills as an attorney. His reputation for integrity and ethics
is the highest.
We are proud of the quality of our practice and we believe Mr. Andrus will prove to be a real
plus in serving our clients.
ROURKE, WOODRUFF & SPRADLIN
ORANGE COUNTY 2001
by Supervisor Marian Bergeson
Orange County 2001 is a proposal that would change the way regional services
are delivered and programs administered throughout Orange County. In short, it looks
at the current limitations on counties and tries to respond by putting in place an
accountable manager who would be responsible for the delivery of regional services.
Because of its complexity, it is a long-term approach to restructuring local government in
urban Orange County that will require both legislative and voter approval. While it
identifies cost savings associated with such changes, it recognizes that shifts in
responsibility involve shifts in funding, too—so savings in one area may mean
transferring costs to another.
Introduction
Of California's 58 counties,perhaps none are quite like Orange. As the state's largest"general
law" Orange County is highly urbanized,with less than 10%of its territory unincorporated.
Further,it has no dominant city--either politically or by population. The cities of Santa Ana
(population 308,000),Anaheim(population 285,000),and Huntington Beach(population 186,000)
are its three largest—but they are but three of 31 cities within the county. Less than 7%of the
county's residents live in unincorporated areas--the largest of these areas are Aliso Viejo
(population 15,000),North Tustin(population 25,000)and the Rancho Santa Margarita-Foothill
Ranch area(population 30,000).
As mandated by the California Constitution(Article XI, Section 1b),the County of Orange is
governed by a 5-member Board of Supervisors. Each Board member is elected by district for a
four-year tens of office. In the past,the Board has vacillated between operating with a"strong"
county administrative officer(CAO)to whom all non-elected department heads report and a
system with a weaker CAO that attempts to Implement the Board's policies. Responding to the
mixed sense of authority and questions about"who was in charge"that contributed to its
bankruptcy,the County recently created the position of County Executive Officer(CEO). The
Orange County Board has given the CEO broad authority to run county operations without, in
many cases, direct Board consent.
As a creation of state government,the County of Orange administers several prognems on behalf
of the State of California. These programs include social services, health care for the indigent,
and court operations. Because much of the countys programs involve both state and federal
funds(along with the level-of-service mandates associated with those funds),a significant
percentage of the county's budget Is non-discretionary. In fact,the Board of Supervisors has
direct control over only about 8%of the funds within the County family of funds(an amount equal
to about 15%of the General Fund).
In May 1995,the County identified more than 300 separate state and federal mandates that
restrict Its operations or require that it provide a certain level of service.With growing trends
towards incorporation of the remaining unincorporated territory,the County of Orange rapidly finds
itself becoming a deliverer of services with little or no discretion over which services are provided
to what population.
Orange County 2001
June 1,1995
Page 2
Summary of Proposal
In light of state and federal mandates and the restrictions on Its operations, many argue that the
County of Orange no longer requires active decision-making bodies governing its operations. The
boards of supervisors who once served as"land barons"and planners of the unincorporated area
have a completely new focus in urban counties--so much so that supervisors' backgrounds may
not be suitable for today's needs. Urban counties today require the guidance of people who have
a particular expertise in service delivery and management. An urban county in 1995 needs good
managers, not good legislators.
Responding to a slow elimination of supervisors'traditional role as land use planners governing
large areas of unincorporated territory,this proposal:
•Eliminates the Board of Supervisors and replaces it with a single elected'COUNTY
MAYOR'who would manage the cost-effective delivery of regional services throughout the
geographic county. As proposed,voters would elect a county mayor who held specific
minimum qualifications for office outlined in the county's charter. Such qualifications may
Include a Moslem Degree from an accredited university or college in Business Administration
or Public Administration and several years experience managing a large scale private firm or
governmental entity.
• Establishes the ORANGE REGIONAL SERVICES AUTHORITY(ORSA)and ORSA's
goveming board to advise and assist the elected County Mayor In providing services. The
ORSA governing board would meet bi-monthly or monthly(as does a corporate Board of
Directors)and be appointed by designated groups throughout the area. Such groups shall
include tan representatives from the Orange County Division of the League of California
Cities,one each from four specific community groups or organizations(such as United Way,
the Health Care Council,and the Grand Jurom AssoclaUon). The elected county mayor shall �J
chair the governing board and serve as Its 151h voting member. Eleven votes of the board
shall override or veto a decision of the elected county mayor.
•Directs the Mayor shall operate four administrative DIVISIONS under ORSA,Including
Health and Human Services,Public Facilities, Public Protection,and Transportation.
•Provides that CITIES take over at least four functions once performed by the County of
Orange,including law enforcement and police services(non-Jell functions), local planning and
land use, low-and moderate-income housing,and library administration.
•Provides that ORSA contract with the STATE OF CALIFORNIA to perform the functions of
Elections and Voter Registration,local agency treasury and Investment(via the State
Treasurers Local Agency Investment Fund),the role of the Department of Education(a non-
county entity under current law),the administration of property taxes,and the court and
marshal operations.
The following page shows an organization chart which outlines Orange County 2001.
�rang.16 county 2001
- I.
-
Oran e.Clwn ;Cities _' Cohn-YMOO '�. gtateafCallforni+.�:
4-year elective term of office
Aliso Viejo Anaheim Chairs ORSA Board Former County Operations
Brea Buena Park I Elections and Registration
Costa Mesa Cypress Orange'Re lobo seeviceij Authority Treasury and Investment
Dana Point Foothill Ranch Governing Board Department of Education
Fountain Valley Fullerton 15 Thal—to City,4 other,I Mayor Property Tax Administration
Garden Grove Huntington Beach Advises Mayor,Vetoes with I I Votes Courts&Marshal
Irvine Laguna Beach
Laguna Hills Laguna Niguel f!GRBAOperActrip
La I Ii bra take Forest Division of Health and Human services Notes:
La Palma Los Alamitos Health Care(OPTIMA) 1.Structure will require Constitutional Amendment
Mission Viejo Newport Beach Sncial Services relating to the elected officers of a county
Orange Placentia (Article XI.Section I IbB
Rancho Santa Marg San Clemente Division of Public Facilities
San Juan Capistrano Santa Ana Flood Control I.Structure will require legislation relating
Seal Beach Stanton parks and Recreation In the cessation of county powers,the
Tustin Villa Park Sanitation and Waste Management modification of OCTA,and the consolidation of
Westminster Yorba Linda Water all non-school special purpose districts.
F
er County Operations Division of Public Prolection
Police Services Coroner
nning and land Use District Attomey/Public Defender
Ilousing Fire and Emergency Management
N
Libraries ]ail Administration(Sheriff/Warden)
c m
cg 3: Prnbatinn
ce
�m
jT Division al Transportation
o a Airport
Roads and Freeways
Transit
Orange County 2001
June 1,1995
Page 4
The Underlying Assumptions
The Orange County 2001 proposal is based upon the following assumptions about urban counties in
general and about the County of Orange in particular.
•Urban supervisors'days of LAND BARONS and as governors of the unincorporated area are
long gone.
•Those areas of urban counties that are not now INCORPORATED should become so(or
become ANNEXED to existing cities).
•Urban county government has become urban area SERVICE DELIVERY.
•There remain specific;services that should be provided on a REGIONAL basis.
•Some of these regional services are currently provided by SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICTS
which can and should be CONSOLIDATED to achieve greater economies of scale.
•Other programs can best be provided locally(by CITIES)or statewide.
•No matter the entity that operates the programs or services. FUNDING should follow
PROGRAMS.
•Good MANAGERS, and not necessarily good legislators,can most effectively deliver
regional services.
Proposal Detail
As noted above,this proposal makes several structural changes in the way the County of Orange
operates in 1995. To accomplish these structural changes,the proposal assumes that the
revenue associated with the changes would follow the programs to be shifted. The following
descriptions of the proposed changes outlines OC 2001's suggested program eliminations,
administrative functions,program divisions, programs transferred to cities,and the programs
contracted with the state. The outline includes,where available,estimated costs or savings
associated with each switch:
1. Program Eliminations
a Board of supervisors. The Change County Board of Supervisors IS posleons)and Its staff(29 positions)
would be eliminated.will a cost Savings of approximately$1.9 million annually. Any staffing requlreme b;of,
the ORSA governing board would be tome by Me County Mayors office under Me OC 2001 proposal. The
ORSA board Itself would serve W Ihoul pay and without stipend. This elimination requires an amendment to
Artlde XI,Section 1(b)of the Califamla Constitution.
TOTALAPPROPRMTIONS =SIMMN
NETORSACOST .= 0 MN
TOTALPOSmONS = 30
POSITION REDUCTIONS . 34
NETCOSTSAVINGS - $1.113MN
•Clerk of the Board. With the Board's position eliminated.the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors and Its staff would
be eliminated W well. The CAB'S duties,from filing notices of meetings and clerking assessment appeals,would be
reduced significantly and absorbed by the County Mayors Office(meeting duties)and Me State of Coldomla
(assessment appeals).
TOTALAPPROPRMTIONS =SI.TMN
NETORSACOST •P 0 MN
TOTAL POSITIONS • n
POSTIWN REDUCTIONS . b
NET COST SAVINGS • S1.71WN ` /
Orange County 2001
June 1,1995
Page 5
�..: •Advocacy&Legislation. Any contact with aimed officials In Washington or Sacramento would be done In
house within Die County Mayors Office or wah members of Me ORSA board Of directors.
iOTALAPPROPRIATIONS =$OS MN
NETORSACOST .$ a MN
TOTALPOSmONS . 0
POSITION REDUCTIONS . 0
NETCOSTSAVINGS . 1105MN
•Loral Agency Formation Commission(LAFCO} LAFCO,a 100%County-funded body that administers
proposals for Me corew0tlaaon or dissolution of special denote and for the annexation or incorporation of
unincorporated areas,would become an Independent entity that relies entirely on fee-far-service payment to meet
it budget obligations.
TOTALAPPROPRIATIONS .$O MN
NET ORSA COST .$O MN
TOTAL POMONS . 0
POSITION REDUCTIONS . ♦
NETCOSTSAVINOS . S30S.000
IL ORSA Adminishatfve Operations
•ORSA Administrative ONlco. The ORSA administrative office would provide stuff support and enelyes b the
County Mayor and m the ORSA Board of Governors. OC 2001 assumes that the'OAV would develop ORSA's
budget,new program guidelines,and monitor performance of division and department operations. OC 2001
proposed meinhuning no OAO at the same level now staffed In Orange Couny's CAO.
TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS .If U MN
NST ORSA COST .S z.1 MN
TOTAL POSITIONS . al
POSITION REDUCTONS . 0
NETCOSTSAVINGS . SOMN
�� •ORSA Auditor. The ORSA aud'Nng function would be contracted out on a two-or three-year bast with a private
sector fine.OC 2001 proposes a 50%savings from current year expenditures with this contract,due both to the
reduction in the size of the entity audited and the competitive bid process associated with the contract.
TOTALAPPROPRIAMONS .52A1VIN
NET ORSA COST .SUMN
TOTALPOsmn . 0
POSITION REDUCTIONS . 371
NETCOSTSAVINGS . SUMN
•ORSA Counsel. As legal advisors to the County and to the Boars Of Supervisors,the County Counsel is an
appomhos omee. OC 2001 proposes contracting out Counsel's function with a private sector firm Mat would
represent the more limited legal needs of ORSA. It proposes a 50%savings Dom current year expenditures with
this contrast,due both to the reduction In the size of the entity represented and the compatillve bid process
associated with the contract.
TOTALAPPROPRIATIONS .$1.7MN
NET OR"COST .$ 1.7MN
TOTALPOSmOM . 0
POSITION REDUCTIONS . BT
NETCOSTSAVWGS . SI.T MN
•ORSA Date Systems. The function Mat operates and maintains ORSA's compmer nelwoms would be contracted
out to a private sector fine Mat specializes in management informaaun systems(MIS). OC 2001 proposes a 50%
savings from cuff ant year expenditures YAM this contract,due both to the reduction In the size of ORSA and me
competitive bid process associated with the contact.
TOTALAPPROPRIATIONS .$4SMN
NET OR"COST .SaSMN
TOTALPOSmOM . 0
POSITION REDUCTIONS = IN
NETCOSTSAVINGS . Sa.5MN
Orange County 2001
June 1,1995
Page 6
•ORSA Facilities Operation.. The function that operates and maintains ORSRs facility leases would be
contramad out to a private Sector firm net speciallzas In property management. CC 20DI proposes a 50%Savings
Imm current year momentums with this contrast,due both to the reduction in Me size of ORSA and the competitive
bid process associated with Me contract.
TOTALAPMOPRIATIONS .$4AMN
NET ORSA COST .SaAMN
TOTAL POSmONS . 0
POSITION REDUCTIONS a N
NETCOSTSAVINOS . $a.0 MN
Ill. ORSA Program Divisions
Division of Health and Human Service.
•Health Cam. Those functions already performed by the Health Care Agency(mast mandated by 9Mm and federal
law)would confinue witthout significant change from the currant county"am. Orange County 20DI places this
function under ORSA's Division of Health and Human Services.
TOTALAPPROPRIATIONS .SMA MN
NETORSACOST .S 2111 MN
TOTAL POSITIONS .222/
POSITION REDUCTIONS .0
NETCOSTSAVINGS .0
•Social Services. Those functional already performed by the Social Services Agency like Child Welfare Services,
Adult Services,Employment Education and Training,and Finenclel Assistance(mast mandated by State law)would
continue under ORSA's Division of Health and Human SerNces.
TOTALAPPROPRIATIONS .SINA MN
NETORSACOST .S 10IIMN
TOTALPOSRtONS .2573
POSGIONREOUCTiONS .0
NETCOSTSAVING9 . 0 l ,
•Community Services. Those functions already performed by the Community Services Agency,like the Area
Agency on Aging,veterans Services,and local Implementatan of the Job Training Partnershlp Act(JTPA)would
contnue as programs funded only by state or federal contributions.
TOTA."PROPRIATIONS .S163 MN
NETORSACOST .S 0 MN
TOTALPOSmONS .10
POSITION REDUCTIONS .12
NETCOSTSAVINGS . Sa AOS
Division of Public Facilities
•flood Control. In Me currant structure,the Environmental Management Agency(EMA)administers the Orange
County Flood Control District under Me directan of Me Board of SupeMsors. CC 2001 placed this function under
ORSA and the County Mayor. 95%of Flood's funding comes from Sources other than the General Fund.
TOTALAPPROPRIATIONS .SWUMN
NETORSACOST .$ 11.1 MN
TOTAL POSRN)NS . Not Available
POSITION REDUCTIONS . NPl Avehable
NET COST SAVINGS . SUMN
Orange County 2001
June1,1995
Page 7
�•"� •Parke and Reereation. In the current structure,EMA's Harbore,Beaches,and Parks division acquires,develops,
operates,and manages the area's harbors,beaches,perks and historic sites. HBBP contacts with Me private
sector o provide maintenance services and to operate specific leases at Featherly Perk and Dena Point Harbor.
CC 2001 assumes continued regional operations of perks and open space,bud the management of specific saes
Mat are closely tied to cities could be shifted o those cities. State tidelands revenue,property taxes,and non-
general fund sources make up 80%of HB$P'S budget
TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS .Sn2MN
NIT ORSA COST =$154 AN
TOTALPOSITIONS . Not Available
POSITION REDUCTIONS . Not Avalable
NET COST SAVINGS . $ OMN
•SanlreUon and Waste Management The Orange County Sanitation Districts(OCSan)and several other
Independent Schouten districts and water districts administer the area's sewage treatment and collection systems.
OC 2001 would consolidate these Separate chance;into a single department within the Division of Public Facilities—
the deperbnent court be competitively,bra to OCSan or a private finn(as Is done by Me City of Indianapolis).The
Waste Management function of this department would also be put to bid,with Me current Integrated Waste
Management Department(IWMD)expected to compete for the area's hareoous waste collection program and
three area tandfills. Sanitary disMuts hold$185 MN in reserves In FY 1994-95,with S29 MN In salary/benefit and
directors'expenses. They collected$79 MN In user lees and$3.2 MN In property Was OC 2001 Sentence Met
these expanses could be reduced by 40%(similar to that which occurred In Indianapolis)and estimates a$48 MN
savings with consolidation.
TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS .SWMN
NET ORSA COST .$ 0 MN
TOTALPOSRIONS . Not Avallable
POSITION REDUCTIONS . Not Available
NET COST SAVINGS . $M MN
•Water. When Orange County residents get their water,It has gone through a relatively complex maze of
government entitles. Groundwater Is administered by the Orange County Wader Dis ict Imported water comes
born the Metropolitan Water District(Met)and as Orange County affiliate,the Municipal Water Dismct of Orange
�a►/ County(MWDOC). DOWD,Mat,and other wholesale dieblcb sell their water l0 one of Orange County's 17.retail
water districts. These disticts can sell the water to other districts or$01)It directly to residents. OC 2001 envisions
a single water department administered by the County Mayor and ORSA that would both administer groundwater
and Imparted water from Mad. Districts held more than S50 MN In reserves In FT 1991 They ccltected$120 MN
In bees end$15 MN in property taxes during the same period. DC 2001 assumes a 45%cut(similar to that of Me
County of Orange)In salary/benefit and directors'lee expenses in estimating a$22 MN Savings with consolidation.
TOTALAPPROPRMGONS .S108 MN
NET Ones COST .$ SUN
TOTAL POSITIONS . Not Available
PO9MN REDUCTIONS . Not Avalable
NET COST SAVINGS . $ 02MN
Division of Public Protection
•Coroner. This function of Me Sheriff-Coroners office would continue at current levels. The coroner is mandated
under stale Isw to(1)transport bodies to an autopsy area,(2)conduct n0umpathology,exams on State Hospital
deaths,(3)Investigate sudden and unexplalned deaths,(4)provide dental charts on unidentified bodies,(5)report to
the CHP on traffic deaths,and(6)to perform autopsies to determine medical causes of death.
TOTALAPPROPRIATONS . Not Available
NETORSACOST . Not Avallabb
TOTAL POSITIONS . Not Av.WM.
POSITION REDUCTIONS . Not Avalable
NETCOSTSAVINGS . Not AV.1".
•District Attorney. The Orange County District Attorney would remain an elective office and in charge of criminal
Investigations,advising Me Grand Jury,and enforcing family support obligations(or me area. OC 2001 would place
the DNS budget controls with Me County Mayor.
TITALAPPROPAMTIONS .$S4.7 MN
NET ORSA COST .$ 4.511IN
TOTALPOSITIONS = Me
POSITRONREDUCTONS = Nora
��,/ NET COST SAVINGS $OMN
Orange County 2001
June 1,1995
Page 8
•Fire and Emergency Management. The Orange County Fire Authority,a joint powers agreement between the Vd
County and 18 dues that Contract with tte Authority for fire sar ces,would effectively continue In a similar role
under Me Division of Public Protection under Orange County 2001. Its Director of Fire Services would report to the
County Mayor. The Emergency Management function,having been moved from the County Administrative Office to
the Sheriffs Department,would be administered by Me Director of Fro Son loan.
TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS . Vino MN
NET ORSA COST . Not AVMMble
TOTAL POSOONS . IN
POSITION REDUCTIONS . No.
NET COST SAVINGS . SOMN
•Indigent Datums. The Orange County Public Defenders office would remaln In charge of defending Mow who
ere unable to Pay for legal services associated Wth criminal Indictments.
TOTALAPPROPRIATIONS .a za2 MN
NET OR9A COST .a=MN
TOTAL POSITIONS . al
POSITION REDUCTIONS . Na.
NET COST SAVINGS . SOMN
•Jail Administration. Under Orange County 2001,ORSA Could choose to mountain existing]all adminlanaton or
to privatize the area's five]ells,Including Theo Lacy in Orange,James Musick in Irvine,and Me Mein Women's and
Men's]all.and Me make and Refers,Center(IRC)In Sane Ana.
TOTALAPPROPRMTIONS . Not Avellabre
NETONSACOST . Not Avelubfe
TOTALPOSITIONS . Not Awdleble
POSITION REDUCTIONS . Norc
NETCOSTSAVINGS . SOMN
•Probation. The Probation Department would Continue to Con Me area's juvenile justice operations,including
juvenile court services,juvenile field supervision.juvenfle atematives,and juvenile lmfttare. It would also
Continue Its adult operations,including adult Court Services,adult field supervision,and adult alternatives. �a.✓
TOTALAPPROPRMTIONS . S6r.t MN
NETORSACOST . $MAMN
TorALPOSmm . Iwo
POSITION REDUCTIONS . None
NET COST SAVINGS . SOMN
•Agricultural CommiealonerlWelghts and Measures. Under Orange County 2001,ORSA could choose to
contact for Moss services mandated by state law relating to Me vertical of local welght5 and measures and the
services of a local agricultural commissioner. OC 2OD1 assumes a 100%reduction In Tet County war Wth ITS
Contract,as any operations would be feaforservice.
TOTALAPPROPMATIONS . SOMN
NETORSACOST . SOMN
TOTAL POSITIONS . 34
POSITIONREDUCTIONS . O4
NETCOSTSAVINGS . a4TS,000
Division of Transportation
•Airport. John Wayne Abperl s administration would Continue as an ORSA-administered department under the
Orange County 2001 plan. Federal Avlation Administration regulations and existing bond covenants limit JWA's
prlveMaton opportunities. JWXs funding would Continue from enterprise revenue.
TOTALAPPROPIVATIONS . 34UMN
NETOIISACCST . 3 0 MN
TOTAL POSITIONS . IN
POSITION REDUCTIONS . None
NET COST SAVINGS . f OMN
a Orange County 2001
June 1,1995
Page 9
\�/ •Floods and Freeways. The operations of the Orange County Tre pombon Authority(OCTA),with a goveming
board Mat oomhlnes city what County representation,would be brought under the umbrella of ORSA. All revenue
from Measure M and from the 1/6-oent existing sales tax contribution to local roads would continue towards the
Roads and Freeways department within ORSA.
TOTALAPPROPRIATIONS = Not Avelleble
NETORSACOST - Not Available
TOTALPOSIT m = Not Avelleble
POSMN REDUCTIONS - Not Avelleble
NETCOSTSAVINGS - Nut Avelleble
•Transit Like the above department,ORSA's new Transit department would operate Me area's mess transit
system. OC 2001 envisions Mat MIs function would be put up for competitive bid to allow private-sector 6mis to
compete for Me least Mouth contract. Gas tax and Measure M revenues would fund this departments operations.
TOTALAPPROPRMTIONS - Not Avallable
NET ORSA COST • Not Avelleble
TOf nsmom • Not Avelleble
POSITION REDUCTIONS = Net Available
NET COST SAVINGS = Not Available
IV. Programs Shifted to Cities
•law,Enioreement/Police Services. Orange County has both cites that operate Meir own police forces and cities
Mat contract with either Me Sheriff or with other aides. Under OC 2001,orders could continue to have this type of
flexibility War other cities or with an ORSA-affiliated law enforcement agency. Should citieschaost to contreci for
police services with a regional law enforcement entity.the overall administrative and management decisions for that
entity would be under Me authority of the County Mayor. Savings from MIs change would be Me elimination of any
contribution from Me general purpose revenue of the County-in other words,law enforcement would be
administered solely with Proposition 172 revenue and contract city fes-forsorvice payments.
TOTAL SAVINGS = $155 MN
�� •Planning and Land Use. With no unincorporated population,aides would absorb all local planning functions
cunenfly performed by the Planning Section of via Environmental Management Agency. At the same time,cites
would designate and fund an area-wide Metropolitan Planning Organization(MPO)that would administer regional
Issues like air quality,transportation(anti the Master Plan of Anginal Highways),and fair share housing allbeebons.
TOTAL SAVINGS = Solari
•Affordable Housing. OC 2001 proposes that the state and federal dollars that are recalved by the Housing and
Community Development division witnin EMA and the operations of Me Orange County Housing Authority bt.
transferred completely fo dtles. Under current law,each city is abligated to meet its pardon Of the slate's fair share
housing allocations-OC 2001 assumes Mat each city has the ability to implement Me"allocations. The dollars
below reflect federal appropriations Mat would go to cites.
TOTAL APPROPINATIONS =5215 MN
•Libraries. The 26 public Swedes that are run from Me County system would be transferred to the cities In which
they operate. Cities would elan recelve the revenue associated with those Operations($20,059.000)-a sum Mat
comes primarily from property tax revenue. Cities would be encouraged to join together wit,neighboring cures and
with local school disMcis to support a localized library system Mat would allow foe-based access for Mesa Orange
County residents who may not live within the immedlate service area of the library. The amount below reflects
property tax revenue associated with library services that would the shifted to cities:
TOTALAPPROPRWTIONS =4114.5 MN
V. Programs Contracted with the State of California
•Eleetlons and Registration. The California Secretary of Staib'e Office would assume responsibility for the area's
voter registration rolls and for conducting elections. With growing computerization of the registration rolls,this will
become an operation that may be far more cost creative w the slate level. Under Me current system,Orange
County citizens ce,register Win the Secretary of State Or with Me least Repeater of Volers.
NETCOUTOSTATE o $SAMN
TOTAL POSITIONS = 1011
Orange County 2001
June 1,1995
Page 10
•Treasury and Investment. The State Treasurer's OMoe adminlstere the Local Agency Investment Fund [LAIF) `ate
for those local agencies that choose to place their revenues under Me State Treasurer's guidance. Orange County
2001 would,in effect,require those agendas Met Owe not to Invest their funds stone to use the Stele Treasurer's
pool on a fm4or-service basis.
NETCOETTOSTATE . Je MN
TOTAL PO9mON5 . 10
•Department of Education. While the County of Orange does not new have any direct budget or management
authority over Me Orange County Department of Eduwtbn,in the spud[of looking at everything government does"
locally.this part of Me OC 2001 proposal would shin or of this depemnenrs operwans to the State Departroent of
Education or to local school districts.
NETCOWTOSIATE . Not A.110le
TOTAL POSITIONS . Not Avall•Me
•Property Tax Administration. Under cument law,the Treasurer-Tax Collector collects property taxes for the
area's schools.titles,anal special districts. The County Assessor evaluates real property and prepares the tax rolls.
The Tax Collector can levy a property tax administrator,fee to cover the costs of collectiog the property Mies. OC
2001 would comma with the Stale of California to administer local property tax collection and property assessment
on a fee-for-service end cost-recovery beets.
NETCOSTTOSTATE . as
TOTAL POSITIONS = 61
•Courts and Marshal. The Stele of California cumentiy funds more Men 80%of the superior and municipal courts'
operations. Following in Me spirit of a proposal advanced by Governor Wilson In his FY 1995.96 slate budget.Mis
proposal would shift full responsibility for both funding end operations of the court system to the State of California
and merge the Countys superior and municipal courts. The hundred cost savings come from the elimination of the
county share of the contributions to both the courts and the Members office-the stale would have to fund courts
fully In order to avoid additional cuts at this level.
NET COST TO STATE " 715211N
TOTAL POSITIONS - leas
The Unincorporated Area
Orange Countys remaining unincorporated areas(Aliso Viejo, Coto de Caza, Dove Canyon,
Foothill Ranch, Leisure Worid/Laguna Hills, Midway City, North Tustin, Ponola Hills,and
Rossmoor)encompass about 10%of the county's population. Orange County 2001 envisions
these areas as either becoming annexed to neighboring cities or, in some cases,incorporated into
cities themselves.
Under current law,the most significant barrier to cityhood for these areas is the provision in state
law(Government Code section 56845)which requires that any proposal for Incorporation result in
an equal exchange of revenue and responsibility for service delivery(the so-called"revenue
neutrality'law). This law allows,however,for an exemption to the revenue neutrality provision if
the county and all of the subject agencies agree to the proposed incorporation.
Under Orange County 2001,all of the region's unincorporated areas would turn 10 cityhood by the
year 2001. Incorporation would follow current state law,which requires several preconditions and
steps if the proposal for Incorporation comes from local residents:
•The area must contain at least 500 registered voters.
•25%or more of the registered voters in the area must sign a petition.
•The application for incorporation goes to the Local Agency Formation Commission
(LAFCO)with a feasibility study.
•LAFCO reviews study and certifies Its contents.
• LAFCO holds public hearings.
Orange County 2001
June 1,1995
Page 11
•LAFCO adopts resolution approving,modifying,or disapproving proposal--LAFCO
cannot approve the proposal If it finds that the revenues going to the new city are
not equal to the county's service expenditures on the area covered by the new city
UNLESS the county and all affected subject agencies agree on the transfer.
•Board of Supervisors calls for election if lass than a majority protest.
•Election held on incorporation and on council candidates.
Revenuelssues
The issue of revenue neutrality will remain a barrier to regional reorganization unless the State of
California devises a new way of apportioning revenue sources. For example,property taxes are
distributed in Orange County between the County, special districts,cities, redevelopment
agencies,and schools in a manner that is unlike the distribution in any other county. In fact,the
County of Orange receives the lowest portion of county-generated property tax than any California
county at about eight cents on the dollar. As such,the county is considered a"donor"county,
giving far more revenue to the state than it receives back in services (some estimates place this
difference at about$2 BN annually).
To help restmctum the way services are delivered in Orange County, OC 2001 suggests that the
State of California devise a new method of revenue apportionment that ties specific
sources of revenue with specific programs. For example,the sales tax may best be used for
state services like K-14 education. The property tax, however, might best be used to fund
property-related services like public safety,parks,libraries,and other services that the state may
not have as strong an interest in insuring an even level of funding across the entirety of the state.
Such a restructuring would be highly controversial--cities that rely heavily on the sales tax,for
example,would see a dramatic change in their funding formulas. Counties that are used to being
"recipient"counties(as they get a much larger share of the local property tax)would see a similar
shift. Many argue,however,that such a change is the only rational way to deal with the realities
of a post-Proposition 13 world where programs now have little or no connection to funding
sources.
OC 2001's Requirements for Implementation
Only a small portion of Orange County 2001 can be completed without state authorization--most
changes require state legislation(and amendments to the California Constitution):
OC 2001 —No State Authorization Required
•Incorporation and annexation of remaining unincorporated area.
•Consolidation of special purpose districts.
•Ability to Invest in State Treasurer's Local Agency Investment Fund(LAIF).
•CC Fire Authority transfer to ORSA.
•Transfer of planning and land use functions to cities.areawide MPO designation.
OC 2001 —State Legislative Changes
•Transfer of Measure M authority from OCTA to ORSA.
•Transfer of OCTA itself to ORSA.
•Transfer of courts and marshal to State of California.
•Transfer of registration and elections function to State of California.
•Transfer of assessment and property tax collection operations to State of California.
•Ability to privatize ORSA administrative functions.
•Ability of State Treasurer to receive and disperse operating revenues of ORSA,schools,cities,
and special districts.
• Elimination of County Department of Education.
Orange County 2001
June 1,1995 p
Page 12
OC 2001 —State Constitutional Changes
•Ellminatlon of a county Board of Suporvisors.
•Elimination of elected county sheriff.
•Elimination of elected county assessor.
What's Next
Orange County 2001 will be presented formally to the Orange County Division of the League of
California Cities and to the California Constitution Revision Commission(CCRC),a 23-member
body that has been charged with revising the state's constitution to reflect modem day changes in
governance. As planned at this time,Supervisor Bergeson Intends to ask the CCRC to establish
within the State Constitution an alternative governance structure based on this proposal. If the
counties voters so wish and If the Constitution is appropriately amended beforehand to allow the
alternative,voters would then be able to establish a"county mayor"system.
The CCRC meets throughout the summer in various California locations. Mr. Fred Silva,
Executive Director of the CCRC can be reached at:
The California Constitution Revision Commission
1201 K Street, Suite 1740
Sacramento,California 95814
916/322-4121 (phone)
91 W23-3927(fax)
The CCRC Is currently in"Phase Two"of their work to propose a full revision to the California
Constitution. The phases are as follows:
•Phase One involved workshops held on state and local governance Issues(September 1994
through February 1995).
•Phase Two Is for the assessment of issues for revision and will last until August 1995.
•Phase Three begins when the Commission adopts and submits a report to the Legislature and
as the Legislature holds hearings on the report(August 1995 through December 1995).
•In Phase Four,the Commission will ask the State Senate and State Assembly to Introduce a
constitutional amendment that would place the proposed revisions before the Legislature and the
voters in November 1996.
Membership of the California Constitution Revision Commission consists of:
William Hauck.Chairmen When Appointee Senator Lucy Killea Senate Rules Appointee
Senator Bill Leonard Wilson Appointee Andrew Baron Senate Rules Appointee
Don Senninghoven Wilson Appointee Belly Tom Chu Senate Rules Appointee
Pal Call Wilson Appointee Lewis Coleman Senate Rules Appointee
William P.Clark Wilson Appointee Anne Baker Senate Rules Appointee
Roben Grady Wilson Appointee
Alan Heslop Wilson Appointee Assemblymen Phil Isenberg Speaker Appointee
Jane Pisano Wilson Appointee George Bebiklan Speaker Appointee
Leon Williams Wilson Appointee Chu]L.Tsang Speaker Appointee
vacancy Wilson Appointee Elizabeth Cabraser Speaker Appointee
Malcolm Lucas Ex Cards
Ruse Gould Ex Olticm
Uz Hill Ex O01do \ ,
`•rri
Orange County 2001
Junel,1995
Page 13
Conclusion
The Orange County bankruptcy presents the County of Orange with both problems and
opportunities. The problems,from layoffs to service cutbacks, are well known--but less attention
has been paid to the opportunity to truly recreate county government to reflect 21 at Century
realities. If given the chance to start from scratch,which services should be provided by which
levels of government? Is there a way to match dollars with programs rather than to levels of
government? And are full-time boards of supervisors really necessary anymore? Can counties
be better managed R run via a structure similar to a corporation?
These are all questions that need to be addressed in any restructuring that the County and its
cities might pursue. Orange County 2001 is not perfect and certainly will cause controversy within
those entitles that face reduction or elimination. It is hoped that its critics, rather than to deride
Orange County 2001 as"unworkable,"will offer instead an alternative plan that is as bold in
examining the changed nature of the urban California county.
. NI 4%-9.1)AM 9
The Orange County Bankruptcy
Round Table
Chapman University
July 19, 1995
rsenveesox v v nm
Today's Presentation
Defining the Problem Paul Sachs
Arthur Andersen LLP
Legal Background Bruce Bennett
Hennigan, Mercer R Bennett
Potential Solutions Christopher Varelas
Salomon Brothers
M10( --I ISAM
Defining the Problem
Paul Sachs
Arthur Andersen LLP
aHnrar�o0o e se nni
Pool Facts
Orange County Investment Pool Loss Analysis
(Dollars In Billions)
Investment Balance Pro Rata
Dec. 6, 1994 Available Cash Pro Rata Loss
Count ' ............_$2.4..._._._. ............._$1_.9._._._._.........._ . ._$0:5
Non-County:
Schools 1.0 0.8 0.2
Cities,Water,,Sewer.&Transportation. .4:1 _.............._..............31.._ --.--...-._._....__1.0
Non-County Total..........--_.......__...._. __.+._. 5.1 .............3.9....................._...............__l: ...._.......
_._._._....
Pool Total $7.5 $5.8 $1.7
ANTI 'UC.L%AM
Pool Settlement
The Investment Pool Settlement (average amounts)
Schools Non Schools
0
Repayment Claims t ;,� _ Repayment Claims
Recovery Notes Senior claims 15.99_ I
Recovery Notes
Cash Cash
3
County Pool Investments
Approximately 500 administered accounts were invested in the County
Investment Pool on December 6, 1994 totaling$2.4 billion dollars.
Debt Repaymem
MAM
Undistributed Taxes
4N,n4 Other
M7,M
General
118,9n
Trusts Waste Managemem
R8,435 E I Bene(ils)A18
mp nyee
VbbM
Sge[e:$eum:lMCeunlYol Q.x.ae axltl6l J/1!/95
ANP( %-a:5'AM
The County of Orange Budget
The County's discretionary funds are a small portion of its total budget
Dedicated General Funds
(Stale&Federal)
$1.2 Billion
Discretionary General Funds
411 540 Milli.
Dedicated Funds
$2.1 Billion
Soune:The CaunlYal QenY.e H{000961"i'st
'i
The Budget Shortfall
Severe losses in interest income have dramatically decreased available funds.
140
170
2
0
E
C
Fn
40 . .
m
i
Properly Mmor Whiele Fund Belanm Inlem, S.I.T.— Other
Tus Fes AraileMe Enrnings
FY 94-950rigieud Budget
F 94-9517reliminary Budget
Son«e5enrte:]MCounly of Orrryp µ(Q61]/IB/95
Q
County of Orange General Fund
Summary of Ongoing Budget Reductions
D.11",in Millions)
Fiscal Year 95 Fiscal Year 96
Revised Budget Preliminary Budget % Reduction
Revenues $293 $275 6%
._..._._........................_........_.___....._.__...__._._.__._._............__.........................................._._..._._.................. ._._........._._...._._._............._._
Expenditures:
Public Protection 160 121 24
General Government 81 61 25
Community &Social Services 74 54 27
Health Services 40 26 35
Insurance &Reserves 88 2 98
„Other 20 11 45
Total Expenditures $463 $275 41%
Preliminary Deficit ($170) $0 100%
7
Z
O
Vo
a• 1 �i
o
7
County Obligations and Allowed Claims
Assessment of County Obligations and Allowed Claims
(Del4nin Millions)
Original
Type Estimate Comments
Recovery Bonds $236 Only interest has been budgeted thus far;
principal payments begin in 2001
County Debt Shortfall 423 Reduced to$356 with issuance of Teeter Bonds
Secured Claims 342 Represents 9t on the dollar to non-school
participants(to a total of 89e);secured by
litigation proceeds
County Non-debt Shortfall 360 To be clarified by completion of Pool Map
Vendor Claims 100 To be clarified by Vendor Map
Repayment Claims 513 subordinated claim
..................._. ......................._....._.--......................................................._.............................._._......._.......-............................._......._._....._...
Total $1,974
Total does not Include administrative claims which are currently estimated to be
approximately $30 million and roll-over accrued interest of $23 million.
The County's objective must be payment In full of all lawful obligations.
The County has agreed to exert its best efforts to repay allowed claims including the "County
Debt Shortfall", "Secured Claims",and "Repayment Claims".
9
RNOPR[i alK /SA MI
County Non-Debt Pool Loss
Assessment of County Non-debt Pool Loss
The 40 largest County accounts comprise over 90% of County related funds.
Each of the 40 largest accounts are being analyzed to determine potential liability
and/or potential availability of funds for interfund borrowing and/or to satisfy other
allowed claims of the County.
Assessment of post-petition balance adjusted to reflect portfolio losses
Determination of draw-down since Chapter 9 filing
Assessment of commitments of beneficiaries of accounts
Pre-petition Vendor claims
Future commitments
Determination of funds available to be drawn-down to satisfy future General Fund
requirements
Assessment of account deficiencies which must be satisfied in full due to legal or economic
requirements
Assessment of remaining balance availability
Interfund borrowing Economic limitations
Permanent appropriation to satisfy allowed claims Legal hurdles
Potential legislative assistance / relief
R_ )C�r56 AM
Public Debt Outstanding
The County has a significant short-term public debt shortfall
Summary of County's Original Short-Term Public Debt Obligations
Irbllan In Milliwn)
Original Available
Type Maturity Princlpal Total Collateral (a) Shortfall
Tax ExemptTRANs: Series A 7/19/95 $169.0 $176.6 $27.9 $146.7
Tax Exempt TRANS: Series B 8/10/95 31.0 31.3 0.0 31.3
..Taxable Notes.........................................................7/10/95.........................600:4........................604:...........................428:�`........._..............175.6...
Total $800.0 $812.0 $456.4 $355.6
(.) A...0 edlmnd for P.1I ee.
11
PNOI`PCS,IXK.9:16.1M
Potential Solutions
Christopher Varelas
Salomon Brothers
Potential Solutions
New revenue options available to the County fall under one of the following
eight categories
Increase existing taxes or user fees
Create new tax revenue stream
Divert existing tax revenues from Orange County agencies, enterprise funds and
special districts to the County of Orange General Fund
Appropriate existing reserves of Orange County agencies, or reallocate County
reserves from currently intended use to that of allowed claims
Restructuring of existing debt obligations
Sale of assets
Privatize services
Expense t budget reductions
13
ANO�FCS�CK B56 AA1
Criteria for Evaluating Revenue Options
The Recovery Team utilized the following criteria in evaluating revenue options
available to the County
Materiality of revenue stream
Component borne by Orange County residents
Distribution and equity of burden; "who pays"
Tertiary impacts to County economy and business development
Positive and negative externalities
County's ability to act unilaterally/need for third party cooperation or approval
Timing
Probability of achieving desired results
a"i� ax-asc nn�
Potential Solutions - Selected Examples
Increase In Existing Taxes Diversion of Existing
or User Fees f New Taxes Tax Flows Appropriation of Reserves Sale of Assets
Waste management Measure M sales tax Enterprise funds John Wayne Airport
Sales tax Bradley-Bums sales tax Special districts Waste management
"Sin"taxes Property taxes County accounts Buildings/ land
Utility tax Tax growth /increment Harbors,beaches and parks
Hotel and bed tax
Business license fees
Parceltax
Gas tax
Restructuring of Privatization f Expense/Budget
Existing Debt securilizalion Reductions
Delinquent property taxes EMA,jails,etc. Unrestricted revenues
Long-term leases Essential use buildings Total County budget
Mandate relief
15
eosr� x.ennu '$
Financial and Legal
Update
Presentation from the Office of the CEO .
July 18, 1995
Salomon Brothers llennlgan.Meurer & Bennett
605FP61 OCC !11 AM
FINANCIAL AND LEGAL UPDATE / IULT 19, 1995
Agenda
I. Assessment of County Obligations and Allowed Claims
11. Assessment of Previously Identified Revenue Sources Available to the
County
Ill. Overview of Potential New Revenue Sources
IV. Assessment of Cash Flow and Capital Requirements of the County for
the Near. and Long-Term
V. Recommended Action Plan
t
CSalomon Brothers r Ilennigan.Mercer& Bennett
rUS�-.,UUr�111 AM
FINANCIAL AND LEGAL UPDATE I IULY 10, 199S
County Obligations and Allowed Claims
Assessment of CountyQbligatlons and Allowed Claims
IDollen N MIIEom) ,
Original
Type Estimate Comments
Recovery Bonds $236 Only interest has been budgeted thus far;
principal payments begin in 2001
County Debt Shortfall 423 Reduced to$356 with issuance of Teeter Bonds
Secured Claims 342 Represents 9t on the dollar to non-school
participants(to a total of 89t);secured by
litigation proceeds
County Non-debt Shortfall 360 To be clarified by completion of Pool Map
Vendor Claims 100 To be clarified by Vendor Map
Repayment Claims 513 Subordinated claim
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Total $1,974
Total does not include administrative claims which are currently estimated to be
approximately $30 million and roll-over accrued Interest of $23 million.
The County's objective must be payment In full of all lawful obligations.
The County has agreed to exert its best efforts to repay allowed claims including the "County
Debt Shortfall", "Secured Claims",and "Repayment Claims".
3
Salomon Brothers Ilennigan.Mercer& Bennett
BO$PR[S]OCC 111 AM
FINANCIAL AND LEGAL UPDATE I JULY 18. 1995
11. Assessment of Previously
Identified Revenue Sources
Available to the County
S
C- Salomon Brothers ` llennigan,Mercer& Bennett
i s •-•
OUSC,CDC-I II AM
FINANCIAL AND LEGAL UPDAT! I MY SL H95
111. Overview of Potential New
Revenue Sources
7
Salomon Brothers llennigan.Mercer& llennell
anfre[Saoa eNAM
FINANCIAL AND LEGAL UPDATE / IULY IE. 199E
New Revenue Sources
Summary of potential new revenue sources
Diversion/ reallocation of existing tax flows
Sales Tax
Bradley-Burns
Measure M
Property taxes to special districts
Tap Into excess reserves, if any, of County accounts and County related agencies
Long-term asset monetization
Restructure existing long-term debt obligations to add new debt capacity
9
Salomon Brothers llennlgan.Itlercer& Bennett -
a
aose�_.sloenAM � e
FINANCIAL AND LEGAL UPDATE / IULY la. 1995
Bradley-Burns Sales Tax
Summary o/Bradley-Burns Sales Tax Collections by City(a)
(OBllan In Mll0onsl
E.1.A 1996
City C.Ib.lbn. I.ro.nl
Mandm $31.9 11.3%
Santa Ma 29.9 106
Irvh1e 29.4 9.2
Cdsta Mesa 25.1 91
Orange 18.2 6./
Huntington&aLh 16.1 5.8
Fullenon 12.9 4.6
Tu.11n 11.6 4.1
Newport Beath 11.5 1.1
G.rden GPJVP 11.3 4.0
Brea 10.1 3.6
Buena Park 8.6 3.1
WeEIPPWler 6.5 30
Founuln Valley 6.2 2.9
MWion Viejo 23 2.2
take Forest 4.4 16
V Habra 1A 1.1
CYPIno, 3.9 1./
us.Niguel 3.2 1.3
U'.HNs 36 1.3
York.Lbul. 3.0 1.1
San Clemente 2.9 1.0
Phanua 2.9 1.0
5.nluan Capistrano 2.7 1.0
Sunton 1.3 0.8
2,g11n.Beata 2.2 0.8
o.1u PONI 2.1 ae
Ins Alamilos 19 0.2
Sai 9earh 1.5 0.5
V Palua 1.0 0.4
Villa Park 0.2 0.1
Total 8282.0 100.0%
(al Eromaled Fool year 19951996 pr9iethm..by the CaM9mia Stak Woo of EquaBaaaon.
�l
Salomon Brothers llennigan.Mercer& Ilennell
fl OJEfl GI OUC tl II AM
FINANCIAL AND LEGAL tMATE / NLY IF, IM
Bradley-Burns Sales Tax
Reallocation of the Bradley-Burns sales tax will require State legislation
overriding a local ordinance provision.
Primary usage of the Bradley-Burns sales tax revenues appears to be bus transit
and support.
Analysis must be completed of impact to bus system of retaining all or some portion of sales
tax revenue and the possibility of utilizing some portion of Measure M dollars to augment lost
revenue.
�^
Salomon Brothers � Ilennigan,hlerttr d Ifennclt A .
9osrM. �ucell ram
FINANCIAL AND LEGAL UPDATE I INLY 16. 1991
Special District Property Tax Allocation
Summary of Special District Property Tax Allocation
(Dolton MMllllom)
Bnslo Total Basle Levy as Reserves as Prellminsry
Property Tax Operating a%el Total a%el Basic INalleestlon
Levy(.) RevenusRl Revenue Reserva.w Levy Target
Sanitary Districts $33.6 $162.6 20.7% $512.4 1523.8% $33.6
Flood Control 32.3 50.2 64.4 114.5 354.0 3.0-8.0
Water Districts 28.4 305.0 9.3 81.1 285.4 28.4
Harbors,Beaches&Parks 27.1 56.4 48.1 26.9 99.1 15.0-20.0
O.C.Transit District 4.7 127.7 3.7 128.4 2754.5 4.7
Vector Control 1.8 6.3 29.3 3.0 165.9 0
CSDs 1.4 - •• -- -- 0
Cemeteries 0.6 1.7 36.6 6.6 1083.5 0
Libraries&Other 2.1 -- - -- -- 0
.................................-.........................................-...................................................................................................................-......-...............................-......._......0-$.................
Total $132.1 $709.8 18.6% $872.9 660.7% $85.0-$95.0
1J 19991999aualyeErbmleprWrty eE kvleapN,,NMdby aNAUNId CMDEUe 5TEEUNI.
Ibl Tdal operating Nvenue hm been nNmmed bom Ne mml enenl,audi9ed Itru9NW aummmam N Ne<ax of Hahon,&arMa erM ParW erJ UN Fla9d
Control DiaMd lrom Ne 199S1996 Cauny9JOrangr R99o9d aWgd. flgulndonotbWude hea lnkd for repaymml oldebl.
Iq a«rvn have bm1 namaad hom Ne mdl rermL aadlhd Mandl saNnNne Dr a aN emeol Webon.&adNaaM Pvba aM dN Flood Conlml Di9MN
bom NN 1999.1996 C9uny UJOmnge Prepared audgd.
1s
Salomon Brothers llennigan.Mercer& Benoelt
PVSI'fl61000 tl II Anl
n NANCIAL AND LEDAL UPDATE / JULY %I. Irrr
Summary of New Revenue Sources
(Dollars in Millions)
Assuming the necessary legislation can be attained, the aforementioned revenue
sources would provide the following revenues
Low High Low High
Bradley Burns
Cities 1/8t 1/0 $35 $70
Transportation Authority 1/80 1/0 35 70
........_._._........_........................................_. ."-_-........_...._.._.......__......_...._._....._.........................
Special Districts
Property Tax Revenues 85 95
Reserves (one time) — —
.............................._......................................_..........................._...........--_......_..................................._..............
Lease Restructure tone time) 100 120
Some combination of these revenue streams will he necessary to facilitate a Plan
of Adjustment which pays all allowed claims 100it on the dollar.
7
Salomon Brothers Ilennigan.Mercer & llemlell '
All rK 1.11.1
FINANCIAL AND LEGAL UPDATE I IDLY 19. 1995
Assessment of Cash Flow and Capital
Requirements
Other than Recovery Plan related financings, the County of Orange can and
will have to limit its access to the public capital markets in the foreseeable future
Preliminary analysis indicates that the County's 1995-1996 TRANs needs may be a
maximum of$50 million.
Preliminary analysis of County accounts indicates that sufficient funds are available to satisfy
the County's TRANs needs through interfund borrowing.
Interfund borrowing will ensure access to needed funds.
There will still be an interest cost of less than $3 million incurred in connection
with Interfund borrowing during Fiscal Year 1995.1996.
Future TRANs needs may be higher unless set aside provisions contained in
Pension Obligation Bonds can be renegotiated or modified in a Plan of Adjustment.
19
Salomon Brothers llennigan, Mercer& Belmelt
ea5rrsv ooc n1 AM
FINANCIAL AND LEDAL UPDATE I DULY 19. 1995
Recommended Next Steps
Further refine and estimate shortfall between likely revenue sources and allowed
claims
Refinement of sources and uses
Complete County Account Pool Map
Complete Vendor Pool Map
Complete comprehensive financial analysis of special districts, cities and
transportation agency
Cash Flow and balance sheet analysis
Assess availability of property tax allocation for potential reallocation to the County
Assess credit implications and impact to user fees of a reallocation of revenues
Research legislative Issues associated with reallocation of sales and property
taxes and appropriation of reserves
Further analyze existing lease obligations and asset lives
Estimate borrowing capacity from restructuring of current lease obligations
Analyze County accounts to determine the nature of the shortfall and potential
availability of reserves
Finalize estimate of 1995-1996 TRANs needs and interfund borrowing capacity
21
Salomon Brothers liennigan,Mercer 3 aennen ( A
POSIP��HKP.IIAM
FINANCIAL AND LEGAL UPDATE / FULY IP, 1995
Addressing the Concerns of the State Legislature
Any Recovery Plan which requires State legislation should emphasize the following
points.
No incremental revenue flows will be required of the State.
The financial crisis will be contained and solved within the confines of Orange County.
The County's debt obligations will be satisfied thereby avoiding any additional or continued
spillover effect to the State's and surrounding municipalities'ability to borrow and cost of
borrowing.
Potential concerns of the Legislature regarding the reallocation of tax flows to
County related agencies should be addressed directly.
The precedent set by the State will affect counties state-wide.
Harsh impacts to user fees and the provision of essential services will constrain the size and
scope of any reallocation.
w
23
Salomon Brothers tlennigan.Mercer 3 Benllcll
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
.r JULY 26, 1995
Agenda Item (7)(a) & (b): Annual election of Joint Chair(Nominee:
Director John C. Cox, Jr.); and, nomination
and election of Vice Joint Chair.
Summary
As provided in the Joint Boards'Rules of Procedure, nominations for Joint Chair were made at the
regular June meeting and the election takes place at the July regular meeting.
Nominations and election of the Vice Joint Chair will be conducted immediately following the
election of the Joint Chair.
For the Directors information, included below is an excerpt from the current Rules of Procedure
relative to the election of the Chair and Vice Chair of the Joint Administrative Organization.
"Chair and Vice Chair of the Joint Administrative Organization.
A Joint Chair and Vice Joint Chair of the Joint Administrative Organization shall be
elected by a majority vote of the Districts at the regular meeting in July of each year.
The nominations for Joint Chair shall be made at the regular Board meeting in June of
each year, and the nominees may prepare a statement of not more than 100 words
stating their qualifications for the office of Joint Chair. The statements shall be mailed to
members of the Joint Boards of Directors with the agenda and other meeting material for
the July regular meeting.
The nominations and election for Vice Joint Chair shall be made at the regular Board
meeting in July of each year and shall be made immediately following the election of the
Joint Chair.
The Joint Chair and Vice Joint Chair shall serve at the pleasure of a majority of the
Districts. In the event the office of Chair becomes vacant due to resignation or
retirement of the incumbent prior to the expiration of the regular term, the Vice Joint
Chair shall automatically succeed to the office of the Joint Chair and shall continue to
serve through the remainder of the regular tens unless sooner removed by action of a
majority of the Districts. In the event the office of Vice Joint Chair becomes vacant prior
to the expiration of the regular term, nominations and the election of a Director to serve
in that capacity shall be conducted at the next regular Board meeting. The person so
elected shall serve the balance of the regularly-scheduled tern unless sooner removed
as a result of action by a majority of the Districts.
Subject to the provisions of serving at the pleasure of a majority of the Districts, the Joint
Chair shall not serve more than two consecutive one-year terms for which he/she has
been elected to the office of Joint Chair.
Staff Recommendation
Staff has no recommendation.
J:UPDOCS5\4G95107-01
COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14
OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
MINUTES
JOINT BOARD MEETING
JUNE 285 1995
°\gtRICTS OF
co �o
c
� y
J
• wW
oTFCr�N�THE ENS\P°a�
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018
ROLL CALL
A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2,3, 5,6,
7, 11. 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was hold on June 28, 1995, at 7:30 p.m., In the
Distriets'Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation Do roll was caged
and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districs Nos. 1. 2,3,5. 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 as
follows:
\� ACTAT ALTRRt1ATE
DIRECTORS DINECTORS
DISTRICT NO. 1: Pot McGuman, Chair _ TO R.Miami
James M.Ferrymen,Chair we tam _ AMvr ferry
g Mart A.Murphy _ Jwme[Baru,
Thomas R. Samaillli y Jim Pots
_y Roger Sum. _ William G.Steiner
DISTRICT NO.2: Jam Collins,Chair _ George Scott
Daniel T.Weldh,Chair pro tam g John M.Saslow
�L Barry De. Bah Bell
Bunn$Dunlap Glenn Parker
Norman Z.Elflummde Cool Downey
Jam"H.Flora Steve Anderson
y_ Pot McGuigan TO R.Moreno
y Mark A.MMpM Joanne Cooma
—L Julie So CMis None,
1 lexicon Singer George L.Zlaket
g Roper Suntan Willa.G. Steiner
Bale Zemel Tam Dal,
DISTRICT NO.3: 3 Sal A.Seem, Chair Henry M.Dotson
1 Be..Dunlop. Chair pro tam Gleam Parker
J� Ceoilm Age Witter Bowman
Georgia Brown Frank Lasdo
S� John Collins George sea"
Z James H.Flora Steve Anderson
�;� Don R.Griffin Porky Marshall
Z Vaster 4ipaig Ralph Bauer
y Wally U. _ Ea G.Miner
1 Pat McGuigan TO R.Moreno
3 Mangle L M. Grace Epperson
Io./ Jere Sol Chris Noroy
Sheldon Singer George L.Zlaket
Roger Summon William G.Steiner
Castles Sylvia Robert W I Neesrn
y Boo Zemol Tom Daly
DISTRICT NO.6: JL_ Jan Dow ,Chair Jam C.Cos,Jr.
g William G. Steiner,Chair pro tem _ Roper Stamon
1 John C.Co.,Jr. _ Jan Dailey
DISTRICT NO.6: y James M.Ferryman,Chair _ Arthur ferry
Jan Oeery.Chair we tam _ John C.Co..Jr.
William G. Steiner _ Roper Ssmon
DISTRICT NO.7: x Barry Narrational Chair _ Mike Ward
_ Themes R. S iltemili,Chair Wo tam Jim Pons
x Jan Dena, John C.Cos.Jr.
James M.Ferryman Anhw PoM
Par MCGa,an TO R.Mariana
1 Mark A.Murphy Jame Comas
a William G.Steiner Roger Sumo.
DISTRICT NO, 11: t Vimor Lelleig. Chair Ralph Bauer
• Shirley Detroit,Clair pro tem Ralph Baum
_a— Roger Stamen William G.Steiner
DISTRICT NO. 13: g John M.Gaslaxon, Chair Daniel T.WNCh
Soo Zemel,Chair pro tam Tom Daly
g Mark A.Murphy Joanne Cowan
Glenn Parker 1 Burma Dunlap
Z William G. Stainer Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO.14: Thomas R.Beneath Chair y Jim Ports
a Mork A.Murphy.Chair pro tam Joe"Comma
Barry Wmnrand Mike Ward
g William G.Steiner Roger Ssmon
i Poor A.Swan Darryl Miller
.2-
O6/28/95
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Don McIntyre, General Manager, Penny Kyle,
Board Secretary, Cathy Biele, Don Crapnell, Mark
Esquer, Gary Hasenstab, Irwin Haydock, Steve
Hovey, Ed Hodges, Patricia Jonk, John Linder,
Pat McNally, Mike Moore, Rory Nelson, George
Robertson, Misha Rozengurt, Gary Streed, Ed
Torres, Chuck Winsor, Paula Zeller,
OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Mr. Gold,
Bill Knopf, Mary Lee, Andre Lissner, Joseph Martin,
Mr. Rosenthal, Phil Stone
DISTRICT 14 In the absence of Chair Thomas Saltarelli, Director
Appointment of Chair pro tem Jim Potts was appointed Chair pro tem of District
No. 14.
ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chair advised the Directors that they had
Report of the Joint Chair been invited to lake a cruise on The Enchanter, the
Districts' monitoring vessel, on July 13 or July 28.
The Directors were requested to contact the General Manager's secretary if they were interested
in participating.
Joint Chair Cox then announced the following tentatively scheduled upcoming meetings as
follows: U
Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee - Wednesday, July 5th, at
5:30 p.m.
Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization Study for Administrative Employees-Thursday,
July 6th, at 4:30 p.m.
Planning, Design and Construction Committee-Thursday, July 6th, at 5:30 p.m.
Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee - Wednesday, July 12th, at
5:30 p.m.
Executive Committee-Wednesday, July 191h, at 5:30 p.m.
The League of California Cities meeting in Monterey conflicts with the regular July 26th Joint
Board meeting. The Joint Chair polled the Directors by a show of hands which reflected three
Directors were planning to attend the meeting in Monterey, thus the Joint Board meeting would
not be rescheduled.
Joint Chair Cox then stated that Executive Committee members should have received an
announcement from CASA regarding the annual work conference in San Diego on August 9th
through 12th. For those Directors not aware, he stated that the Districts have been a major
player in CASA for a number of years and that Directors on the Executive Committee and
Districts' staff have been involved in this program. He also mentioned that Tom Woodruff,
-3-
06/28/95
General Counsel, would be president of CASA next year. Joint Chair Cox also reported that he
`✓ currently serves as the Chair of the Directors' Committee, as well as sits on several other
committees and Director Sal Sapien was recently appointed to the Water Committee. Many of
the other Directors who participated in CASA are no longer Directors and Chair Cox stressed the
importance of the Directors on the Executive Committee to get involved in CASA.
DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or amendments to the
Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held May 24, 1995,
the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed
approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or amendments to the
Aooroval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held May 24, 1995,
the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed
approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or amendments to the
Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held May 24, 1995,
the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed
approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or amendments to the
Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held May 24, 1995,
the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed
approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or amendments to the
Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held May 24, 1995,
the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed
approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or amendments to the
Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held May 24, 1995,
the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed
approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or amendments to the
Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held May 24, 1995,
the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed
approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or amendments to the
Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held May 24. 1995.
the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed
approved, as mailed.
..✓
-4-
O6/28/95
DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or amendments to the
Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held May 24, 1995.
the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed
approved, as mailed.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duty carried:
Ratification of payment of Joint and
Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual District claims
set forth on exhibits"A" and"B" attached hereto
and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the
respective Boards in the amounts so indicated.
05/31/95 06/14/95
ALL DISTRICTS
Joint Operating Fund - $1,404,438.38 $538,073.30
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 626,873.39 270,677.09
Joint Working Capital Fund - 226,361.10 196,842.70
Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 15,309.90 19,976.94
DISTRICT NO, 1 - 0.00 5,032.64
DISTRICT NO. 2 - 11,241.23 52,026.71
DISTRICT NO, 3 - 182,577.61 230,137.88
DISTRICT NO. 5 - 6,901.50 4,458.23
DISTRICT NO. 6 - 0.00 3,402.12
DISTRICT NO. 7 - 8,659.04 4,464.37
DISTRICT NO, 11 - 53,020.33 20,464.11
DISTRICT NO, 13 - 0.00 0.00
DISTRICT NO. 14 - 186,212.03 17,295.25
DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 2,739.48 2,061.88
DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 206.80 2,652.26
DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 976.09 5,239.14
52,725,516.88 $1 ,372,804,62
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Awarding Purchase Order Contract for
Rental or Purchase of Emergency That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to receive
Disinfection Chemical Metering Pump Feed and file bid tabulation and recommendation and
System. Specification No. R-044, to award purchase order contract for Rental or
Prominent Fluid Controls. Inc. Purchase of Emergency Disinfection Chemical
Metering Pump Feed System, Specification
No. R-044, to Prominent Fluid Controls, Inc., for a
total amount not to exceed $57,160.00, plus sales tax.
-5-
O6/28/95
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Awardina Purchase of Natural Gas,
Specification No. P-160. to Amoco Energy That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt
Trading Corporation Resolution No. 95-56, receiving and filing bid
tabulation and recommendation and awarding
contract for Purchase of Natural Gas, Specification No. P-160, to Amoco Energy Trading
Corporation, for the discount price of$.0259/MMBTU, for a one year period beginning August 1,
1995. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Supporting the Reconfiguration of the
Orange County Regional Advisory and That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt
Planning Council (RAPCI Resolution No. 95-57, Supporting the
Reconfiguration of the Orange County Regional
Advisory and Planning Council (RAPC); and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Joint Chair, be, and is hereby, appointed as the primary
representative and Vice Joint Chair as the alternate representative.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing the General Manager to
designate members of the Boards and/or That the General Manager, or his designee, be,
staff to attend and Participate in and is hereby, authorized to designate members of
various training Programs. meetings. the Boards and/or staff to attend and participate in
hearings, conferences, facility inspections various training programs, meetings, hearings,
and other functions conferences, facility inspections and other functions
which, in his opinion,will be of value to the Districts
or affect the Districts' interests, including, but not limited to, those conducted by organizations
providing specific training, state and federal legislative and regulatory bodies and the California
Association of Sanitation Agencies, California Water Environment Association, Association of
Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies, and the Water Environment Federation; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging and incidental expenses be, and
is hereby, authorized in accordance with existing Districts' policies and the approved annual budget
for 1995-96; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That staff be, and is hereby, directed to provide the Finance, Administrative and
Human Resources Committee with a quarterly review of training, meeting and travel expenses
incurred.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Annual nominations for Chair of the Joint
Administrative Oroanization The General Counsel briefly reviewed the
provisions of the Districts' Rules of Procedure
relating to nomination and election of the Joint Chair and Vice Joint Chair.
This being the annual meeting fixed by the Boards at which nominations are to be made for the
office of Chair of the Joint Administrative Organization, the Secretary then declared the nominations
open.
" -6-
06/28/95
Director John C. Cox, Jr., was then nominated as a candidate for the office of Chair of the Joint
Administrative Organization. It was pointed out that nominations would remain open until the regular.)
July Board meeting. The Secretary then reported that the election would be held at said July
meeting in accordance with the Boards' Rules of Procedures for the Conduct of Business of the
Districts. Nominations and election of a Vice Joint Chair will also be held at the regular July meeting.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive and file draft minutes of the
Steering Committee That the draft minutes of the Steering Committee
meeting held on May 24, 1995, be, and are hereby,
received and ordered filed.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive and file draft minutes of the
Planning. Design and Construction That the draft minutes of the Planning, Design and
Committee Construction Committee meeting held on June 1,
1995, be, and are hereby, received and ordered
filed.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive and file draft minutes of the
Operations. Maintenance and Technical That the draft minutes of the Operations,
Services Committee Maintenance and Technical Services Committee
meeting held on June 7, 1995, be, and are hereby,
received and ordered filed.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive and file draft minutes of the
Finance. Administrative and Human That the draft minutes of the Finance,
Resources Committee Administrative and Human Resources Committee
meeting held on June 14, 1995, be, and are
hereby, received and ordered filed.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive and file draft minutes of the
Executive Committee That the draft minutes of the Executive Committee
meeting held on June 21, 1995, be, and are hereby,
received and ordered filed.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carded:
Authorizing funding in the 1995-96 CORF
Budget for continuing studies in the Orange That the funding of$100,000.00 in the 1995-96
County Regional Water Reclamation Proiect CORF budget for continuing studies on the Orange
County Regional Water Reclamation Project, be,
and is hereby, authorized. '
..
-7-
O6/28/95
ALL DISTRICTS (PDC95-211
.� Actions re Secondary Treatment
Improvements at Plant No. 1 Job
No. P1-36-2
Verbal report of Director of The Director of Engineering reported that this
Engineering project was the final of four construction contracts
that will improve the ability of existing secondary
treatment facilities to treat primary ef0uent.
Mr. Linder then stated that on May 16, 1995, eight bids were received for this project.
The bids ranged from a high of$40,427,000.00 to a low of$35,291,000.00, submitted by
Margate Construction, Inc., and recommended that the contract be awarded to the low
bidder. The engineer's estimate was $42,300,000.00.
Approving Addendum No. 1 to the Moved, seconded and duly carded:
plans and specifications for Job
No. P1-36-2 That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and
specifications for Secondary Treatment
Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36-2, making miscellaneous technical
clarifications, be, and is hereby, approved.
Approving Addendum No. 2 to the Moved, seconded and duly carried:
plans and specifications for Job
Not P1-36-2 That Addendum No. 2 to the plans and
specifications for Secondary Treatment
Improvements at Plant No. 1, making miscellaneous technical clarifications, be, and is
hereby, approved.
Awarding Job No. Pl-36.2 to Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Margate Construction, Inc.
That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt
Resolution No. 95-58, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and
awarding contract for Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job
No. P1-36-2, to Margate Construction, Inc., in the total amount of$35,291,000.O0. Said
resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS (PDC95-22) Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Professional Services Agreement
with John Carollo Engineers for design of That the Planning, Design and Construction
Job No. J-33-2 Committee certification of the final negotiated fee
relative to the Professional Services Agreement
with John Carollo Engineers for design of Main Sewage Pump (MSP) No. 3 Drive at Headworks
No. 2 at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-33-2, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 95-59, approving
said agreement with John Carollo Engineers for said services on an hourly-rate basis for labor
plus overhead, subconsultanl fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $193,100.00.
Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
-8-
06/28/95
ALL DISTRICTS (OMTS95-029) Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adoptina a policy for the Control and
Containment of Spills in the Districts' ownetl That a policy for the Control and Containment of
and/or Operated Systems Spills in the Districts' owned and/or Operated
Systems, be, and is hereby, adopted.
ALL DISTRICTS (OMTS95-030) Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Addendum No. 3 to the
Professional Services Agreement with K.P. That the Operations, Maintenance and Technical
Lindstrom Inc. for environmental consulting Services Committee certification of the final
services negotiated fee relative to Addendum No. 3 to the
Professional Services Agreement with K. P.
Lindstrom, Inc. for environmental consulting services to assist staff on NPDES Permit activities;
regulatory and legislative liaison activities; and for technical support for sludge management, air
quality, reclamation and conservation issues and in connection with CEQA compliance for Master
Plan projects, providing for a six-month extension of the agreement, be, and is hereby, received,
ordered filed and approved; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adapt Resolution No. 95-60, approving
Addendum No. 3 to said agreement with K P. Lindstrom, Inc. for said services, providing for a six-
month extension of said agreement, on an hourly-rate basis for labor including overhead, plus
direct expenses, subconsultanl fees and fixed profit,with no change in the total authorized
maximum compensation of$295,500.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a
part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS (OMTS95-033) Moved, seconded and duly carded: �..�
Approving agreement with SAIC for
Districts' 120-inch Ocean Outfall. That the Operations, Maintenance and Technical
Specification No. P-156R Services Committee certification of the final
negotiated fee relative to agreement with SAIC for
Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for Districts' 120-inch Ocean Outfall, Specification
No. P-156R, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 95-61, approving
agreement with SAIC for said services, for the period July 1, 1995 to February 28, 1997. with
option for two one-year extensions, for an amount not to exceed $1,486,463.00. Said resolution,
by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS (OMTS95-0351 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing staff to issue a Purchase order
to South Coast Air Quality Management That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue a
District P2-42 purchase order to South Coast Air Quality
Management District (SCAQMD) in an amount not
to exceed $250,000.00 for payment of various fees required by SCAOMD regulations, payable
during fiscal year 1995-96, estimated as follows:
-9-
06/28/95
Type of Fee Amount
Annual Emissions $85,000.00
Operating Permits 50,000.00
CARB Emissions 20.000.00
Compliance Source Testing 20,000.00
Permit 8 Plan Applications 60,000.00
Miscellaneous 15,000.00
TOTAL $250.000.00
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ratifying Amendment No. 1 to the 1993
Series Refunding Agreement with That Amendment No. 1 to the 1993 Series
PaineWebber Refunding Remarketing Agreement with
PaineWebber providing that if the Certificates of
Participation are converted to a fixed rate of interest mode, "at the direction of the Bank, the
Bank will pay the reasonable[remarketing agent's]fee", be, and is hereby, ratified.
ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR95-26) Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing Districts' Insurance Broker to
Place All-Risk Property Insurance Coverage That the Districts' Insurance Broker, Robert F.
Driver Associates, be, and is hereby, authorized to
place All-Risk Property Insurance Coverage for 11995-96�,, as follows:
ROW N�TERMS: All-Risk Insurance including earthquake and flood,
personal property and business interruption.
Total Asset Value $1,375,032,593
COVERAGE:
All-Risk $200,000,000
Earthquake:
CSDOC 30,000,000
DEDUCTIBLE:
All Perils $25,000
Earthquake 5% Per Unit, $250,000 min.
PREMIUM: -$1,358,000
'Plus taxes and fees of$33,456
„' -70-
O6/28195
ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR95-29) /
Actions re External Money Manager and
Custodial Services Bank for the Districts'
Investment Program
Approving Professional Services Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Agreement with Pacific Investment
Management Company That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt
Resolution No. 95-75, approving Professional
Services Agreement with Pacific Investment Management Company, to serve as the
Districts' investment manager, and authorizing the General Manager to execute said
agreement in form approved by General Counsel. Said resolution, by reference hereto,
is hereby made a part of these minutes.
Approving Professional Services Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Agreement with Mellon Trust Company
That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt
Resolution No. 95-76, approving Professional Services Agreement with Mellon Trust
Company, to serve as master custodial services bank, and authoring the General
Manager to execute said agreement in form approved by General Counsel. Said
resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR95-30) Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving revisions to the Management
Performance Review Plan (MPRP) That funds totaling $173,000 beyond the 3.0% of
Performance Incentive Values payroll Merit Pool Fund approved last year
sufficient to address the more critical range position
issues now occurring, be, and are hereby, authorized; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That a Target Merit Pool Fund of 5.0% of payroll (totaling $453,000) for
implementation in July 1996 sufficient to incentivize performance, as recommended by Ernst &
Young, be, and is hereby, established; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That provision of extensive training to all supervisors and managers in
proper administration of the program as recommended by Ernst & Young, be, and is hereby,
approved.
ALL DISTRICTS (EXEC95-01) Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive and file General Counsel's
Memorandum re Status Report on That the General Counsel's Memorandum dated
Proposed Consolidation of Districts June 14, 1995 re Status Report on Proposed
Consolidation of Districts, approving, in concept,
the consolidation of the Boards, be, and is hereby, received and filed; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That staff and General Counsel, be, and are hereby, authorized to
proceed with additional studies for said consolidation.
-11-
O6/28/95
ALL DISTRICTS (EXEC95-03) Moved, seconded and duly carried:
�./ Authorizing the General Manaaer to
approve expenditures of funds up to That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt
$50,0000 for Contracts. Services and Resolution No. 95-62, amending Resolution
Purchase Orders, Excluding Public Works No. 95-9, authorizing the General Manager to
Contracts governed by State Law, and approve expenditure of funds up to $50,000.00 for
Professional Services Agreements Contracts, Services and Purchase Orders,
governed by Resolution No. 95-9 Excluding Public Works Contracts governed by
State Law, and Professional Services Agreements
governed by Resolution No. 95-9. Said resolution, by reference hereto, Is hereby made a part
of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager referred the Directors to a
Approving 1995-96 Joint Works Budaets one-page handout included in their meeting folders.
Funds He referred to the $599 figure which is the
estimated cost of treatment for a million gallons of
wastewater for next year. Mr. McIntyre slated he would be making a presentation to every
employee and provide them with a summary handout of the budget. Employees will be
encouraged to talk and contribute to reducing and/or keeping this cost down.
Directors then questioned the increased cost of odor control chemcals. The Director of Finance
reported that there are several chemicals involved and the price on each of those chemicals has
gone up. Currently caustic soda is the main chemical used for odor control. This chemical was
recently rebid and the costs have increased 50% in the unit cost. Mr. Streed mentioned that the
Districts are exposed to far less of a risk and the chlorine is out of the budget at this point. He
also mentioned that Technical Services is evaluating alternatives to the chemicals used in
biofiltration and the biotrickling filter.
It was then moved, seconded and duly carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: George Brown, John Collins, John C. Cox, Jr., Jan Debay, Barry Denes, Shirley
Dettloff, Burnie Dunlap, Norman Z. Eckenrode, James M. Ferryman, James H.
Flora, Don R. Griffin, John M. Gullixson, Barry Hammond, Victor Leipzig, Wally
Linn, Pat McGuigan, Jim Potts, Margie L. Rice, Julie Sa, Sal A. Sapien, Sheldon
S. Singer, Roger R. Stanton, William G. Steiner, Peer A. Swan, Charles E.
Sylvia, Bob Zemel
NOES: None
ABSENT: Cecilia L. Age, Mark A. Murphy
That the proposed Joint Operating Budget Funds of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5,
6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 for the 1995-56 fiscal year, be, and are hereby, approved and adopted as
follows:
�.d -12-
O6/28/95
Fund Total Amount
Joint Works Operating/Working Capital $ 54,380,000
Workers'Compensation Self-Insurance 307,000
Public Liability Self-Insurance 272,000
Dental Health Plan Trust Self-Insurance 437,000
Joint Works Capital Outlay Revolving 33,530,000
DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and unanimously carried by roll
Approving 1995-96 fiscal Year budget call vote:
That the District's 1995-96 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and
approved in the following amounts:
Operating Fund $13,809,000
Capital Facilities Fund 10,904,000
Construction Fund- 1990-92 8,872.000
TOTAL $33.585.000
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and unanimously carried by roll
Approving the 1995-96 budget call vote:
That the District's 1995-96 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and
approved in the following amounts:
Operating Fund $53,245,000
Capital Facilities Fund 60,455,000
Construction Fund- 1990.92 24,024,000
TOTAL $137.724.000
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and unanimously carried by roll
Approving the 1995-96 Budget call vote:
That the District's 1995-96 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and
approved in the following amounts:
Operating Fund $65,946.000
Capital Facilities Fund 61,204,000
Construction Fund - 1990-92 22,459,000
TOTAL $149.609.000
-13-
O6/28/95
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and unanimously carried by roll
Approving 1995-96 Budget call vote:
That the District's 1995-96 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and
approved in the following amounts:
Operating Fund $13,415,000
Capital Facilities Fund 14,361,000
Construction Fund- 1990-92 5,674,000
TOTAL $33.450.000
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and unanimously carried by roll
Aoprovina 1995-96 Budget call vote:
That the District's 1995-96 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered fled and
approved in the following amounts:
Operating Fund $12,073,000
Capital Facilities Fund 7,473,000
Construction Fund- 1990-92 2,964.000
TOTAL $22,510.000
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and unanimously carried by roll
�..i Approving 1995-96 Budget call vote:
That the District's 1995-96 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and
approved in the following amounts:
Operating Fund $21,726,000
Capital Facilities Fund 17,604.000
Construction Fund - 1990-92 7.323.000
TOTAL $46.653.000
DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and unanimously carried by roll
Approving 1995-96 Budget call vote:
That the District's 1995-96 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and
approved in the following amounts:
Operating Fund $13,801,000
Capital Facilities Fund 9,920.000
Construction Fund- 1990-92 5,054,000
Bond & Interest Fund- 1958 33 000
TOTAL $26.808.000
-14-
06/28/95
DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and unanimously carried by roll
Aoorovina 1995-96 Budget call vote:
That the District's 1995-96 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and
approved in the following amounts:
Operating Fund $2,046,000
Capital Facilities Fund 7,511,000
Construction Fund- 1990-92 27 000
TOTAL 9 584 000
DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and unanimously carried by roll
Approving 1995-96 Budget call vote:
That the District's 1995-96 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and
approved in the following amounts:
Operating Fund $3,521,000
Capital Facilities Fund 9,601,000
Construction Fund- 1990-92 158,000
TOTAL $13.260.000
DISTRICTS 1. 2. 3. 5. 6. 7 & 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Establishing the annual Gann `...�
Appropriations Limit for fiscal Year 1995-96 That the following resolutions selecting the annual
change in Califomia per capita personal income as
the cost-of-living adjustment factor, and establishing the annual Gann Appropriations Limit for
fiscal year 1995-96 for each District in accordance with the provisions of Division 9 of Title 1 of
the California Government Code, be, and are hereby, adopted by the respective Boards of
Directors:
DISTRICT RESOLUTION NO. LIMITATION
1 95-63-1 $2,760,000
2 95-64-2 10,548,000
3 95-653 14,521.000
5 95-66-5 2,604,000
6 95-67-6 1,689,000
7 95-68-7 4,805,000
11 95-69-11 3,142,000
Said resolutions, by reference hereto, are hereby made a part of these minutes.
�.
-15-
O6/28195
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly monied:
V..� Delegating authority to the Plannina. Desian
and Construction Committee and the Ad That the Planning, Design and Construction
Hoc Committee re Space Utilization Study Committee and the Ad Hoc Committee re Space
for actions re Modifications to the Existing Utilization Study, be, and are hereby, delegated
Interior Office Spaces in the Administration authority to solicit, negotiate, award and issue
Buildino for the General Management purchase orders to various vendors for
Administration and Communication Offices Modifications to the Existing Interior Office Spaces
(Specification No. E-256) in the Administration Building for the General
Management Administration and
Communication Offices (Specification No. E-256), in an amount not to exceed $165,250.00.
ALL DISTRICTS General Counsel reported that he and Gary Streed,
Status report re Countv's Commingled Director of Finance, had attended a meeting earlier
Investment Pool that day with the Investment Pool Committee
members.
One of the issues discussed at the meeting was the disbursement of interest on the post-
petition monies that were in the pool. In order to avoid delay in getting each of the agencies
their checks, it was agreed that the post-petition interest that was earned on the fund would be
set aside for a week or two because of a disagreement between the County's accounting firm,
Arthur Andersen, and the Pool Commmittee's accounting firm, Price Waterhouse. There is a
dispute as to the numbers, a variance of$15 million, with Arthur Andersen saying it is
$15 million less than Price Waterhouse. The Pool Committee today directed Pat Shea and the
representatives from Price Waterhouse to make a demand for the uncontested amount to Arthur
Andersen and then work around the difference so that money can at least be distributed to each
of the pool members.
Mr. Woodruff stated there were also monies withheld by the Wall Street brokerage firms when
they liquidated the pool assets. Those sums are being challenged and will hopefully be
recovered later.
Also discussed was Judge Ryan's ruling of the prior day relative to the proposed roll over of the
bonded debt and the agreements related to it that were offered by the County. The investment
pool had filed an opposition to the agreement on the basis that it was prejudicial to the rights of
all of the pool participants, those rights being the ones that were set forth in the comprehensive
settlement agreement. The effect of it was to place the claims of the pool participants in a lower
hierarchy and others would have been able to move ahead, thus the protests and objection to
the motion were lodged. The Judge did approve the motion of the County on June 27th in the
revised forth of the agreement. The Pool Committee this date voted unanimously to direct its
counsel to consider and report to the Pool Committee for final decision in one week, of the filing
of the appeal of Judge Ryan's order for the same basic reason, as the position of the Districts
and the cities has been prejudiced because it is contrary to the terms of the comprehensive
settlement agreement.
-16-
O6/28195
ALL DISTRICTS
Action re Office Trailer Relocations at Plant
Nos 1 and 2 Specification No. M-044
(Rebid)
Verbal Report of Director of The Director of Engineering reported that this
Engineering project was originally bid and awarded in 1993, but
the contractor defaulted. In 1994 the contractor's
surety, Frontier Pacific Insurance Company, agreed to complete the work or accept the
Districts' rebid and pay the new contract amount in excess of the original bid amount of
$199,200.00.
Mr. Linder advised that on June 6, 1995, two bids were received for this project. The
bids were for$479,031.00 and $298,700.00, the low bid submitted by Colich & Sons,
Inc., and recommended that the contract be awarded to the low bidder. The engineers
estimate for the work was $350,000.00.
Approving Amendment to Settlement Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Agreement with Frontier Pacific
Insurance Company That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt
Resolution No. 95-70, approving Amendment to
Settlement Agreement with Frontier Pacific Insurance Company, providing for time
constraints and Surety's right to perform work. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is
hereby made a part of these minutes.
Awarding Specification No. M-044 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
(Rebid). to Colich Brothers. Inc..
dba Colich & Sons That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt
Resolution No. 95-71, receiving and filing bid
tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Office Trailer Relocations at
Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Specification No. M-044 (Rebid), to Colich Brothers, Inc., dba Colich
& Sons in the total amount of$298,700.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is
hereby made a part of these minutes,
ALL DISTRICTS
Actions re adootion of Ordinance Providing
Additional Service Credit to Eligible Districts'
Employees Who Retire Early
Verbal Report of General Counsel General Counsel reported that the Boards had
previously approved the Early Retirement
Program for certain employees and all documentation has been submitted to the County.
The County's retirement system requires this program to be approved by an ordinance
adopted by the Boards of Directors. He further stated that there are no substantive
changes In what was previously approved by the Boards of Directors.
Mr. Woodruff then advised that only District No. 1 would be required to adopt the
Ordinance as it would be acting as agent on behalf of the other Districts.
-17-
O6/28/95
Receive and file General Counsel's Moved, seconded and duly carried:
`ad Memorandum dated June 22, 1995
That General Counsel's Memorandum dated
June 22, 1995, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed.
Reading of Proposed Ordinance Moved, seconded and duly carried by unanimous
No. 126 vote:
That proposed Ordinance No. 126, an Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Providing Additional Service
Credit to Eligible Districts' Employees Who Retire Early, be read by title only, and that
reading of said Ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived.
Adoption of Ordinance No. 126 Moved, seconded and duly carried by the following
roll call vote:
AYES: Pal McGuigan, Chair, James M. Ferryman, Jim Potts, Roger R.
Stanton
NOES: None
ABSENT: Mark A. Murphy
That Ordinance No. 126, an Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation
District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Providing Additional Service Credit to Eligible
Districts' Employees Who Retire Early, be, and is hereby, adopted as an urgency
measure to be effective immediately.
ALL DISTRICTS General Counsel reported to the Directors the need
General Counsel's Comments Prior to for a closed session as authorized by Government
Closed Session Code Sections 54956.9, 54957 and 54957.6 to
discuss and consider the items that are specified
as Items 18(b)(1) and (2) on the published Agenda. No other items would be discussed or
acted upon.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Convene in closed session pursuant to
Government Code Sections 54956.9 and The Boards convened in dosed session at
54957.6 8:12 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Sections
54956.9 and 54957.6. Confidential Minutes of the
Closed Session held by the Board(s) of Directors have been prepared in accordance with
California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the
Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. No action was
taken re Agenda Item 18(b)(2).
ALL DISTRICTS At 8:24 p.m., the Boards reconvened in regular
Reconvene in regular session session.
06/28/95
ALL DISTRICTS Upon hearing a report of its management
Termination of Confidential Employees Unit representatives, the Chair reported that during
closed session the Boards of Directors acted to
withdraw the formal recognition of the Confidential Unit of district employees and to terminate
said unit. All employees that were previously in this recognized unit are transferred to either the
management group or the recognized representative unit of District Administrative and Clerical
Employees ("DACE"). These actions were approved following meet and confer sessions
between Districts' management representatives and the Confidential Unit representatives which
resulted in agreement to recommend the actions to the Boards.
ALL DISTRICTS
Actions re Supplemental Agenda Item
relative to Summons and Complaint re
Unlawful Employment Discrimination, Jane
Kaye vs. County Sanitation Districts of
Orange County. Orange County Superior
Court. Case No. 748432
Authorizing consideration of Moved, seconded and unanimously carried:
Supplemental Agenda It;
relative
to Summons and Complaint re That the Boards of Directors do hereby authorize
Unlawful Employment consideration of supplemental agenda item relative
Discrimination. Jane Kaye vs, to the Summons and Complaint for Unlawful
County Sanitation Districts of Employment Discrimination, Jane Kaye vs. County
Orange County, Orange County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Orange
Superior Court Case No. 748432 County Superior Court Case No. 748432, relative to
alleged discrimination and personal injuries as a
result of Ms. Kaye's termination as a probationary employee, which was not posted 72
hours prior to the Board meeting date because the need to take said actions arose
subsequent to the agenda being posted.
Verbal report of General Counsel General Counsel reported that this Summons and
Complaint claims employment discrimination.
Claimant was employed in the Board Secretary's office as a clerical staff employee and,
as with every employee of the Districts, was in probationary status for the first six
months. After approximately five weeks this employee was terminated.
19
06/28/95
Receive and file Summons and Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Complaint for Unlawful Employment
Discrimination, Jane Kaye vs. That the Summons and Complaint for Unlawful
County Sanitation Districtsof Orange Discrimination, Jane Kaye vs. County Sanitation
County, Orange County Superior Districts of Orange County, California, Orange
Court Case No. 748432 County Superior Court, Case No. 748432, relative
to alleged discrimination and personal injuries as a
result of Ms. Kaye's termination as a probationary employee, be, and is hereby, received and
ordered fled; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Districts' General Counsel, be, and is hereby, authorized to
appear and defend the interests of the District.
DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adioumment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so
adjourned at 8:24 p.m.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adioumment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so
adjourned at 8:24 p.m.
DISTRICT 5
Actions re proposed Annexation No. 9-
Crystal Cove State Park Annexation
Approving Agreement with the State Moved, seconded and duly carried:
of California. Department of Parks
and Recreation That the Board of Directors hereby adopts
Resolution No. 95-72-5, approving Agreement with
the State of California, Department of Parks and Recreation, in connection with
proposed Annexation No. 9- Crystal Cove State Park Annexation, annexation of a 20-
acre portion of Crystal Cove State Park known as the Historic District. Said resolution,
by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
-20-
O6/28/95
Receive and file request for Moved, seconded and duly carried:
annexation and authorizing initiation
of proceedings re proposed That the letter dated May 22, 1995, from the Slate
Annexation No 9-Crystal Cove of California, Department of Parks and Recreation
State Park Annexation requesting annexation of a 20-acre portion of
Crystal Cove State Park known as the Historic
District, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 95-73-5,
authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to the District (proposed
Annexation No. 9- Crystal Cove Slate Park Annexation to county Sanitation District
No. 5). Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adioumment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so
adjourned at 8:24 p.m.
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adioumment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so
adjourned at 8:24 p.m.
DISTRICT 7 �.,.✓
Actions re Parallel and Replacement of
Portions of Lemon Heights Subtrunk Sewer,
La Colina Drive to Newport Boulevard,
Contract No. 7-2 . and Manhole Access
Modifications to RA-14 Sewer at Newport
Boulevard at Cowan Heights Drive, Contract
No. 7-24
Verbal report of Director of The Director of Engineering reported that this
Engineering project is an 8,000 foot long line that will replace
smaller, older lines that are over capacity in the
Tustin Hills area.
Mr. Linder then stated that on May 23. 1995. eight bids were received for this project.
The bids ranged from a high of$1,979,877.50 to a low of$1,391,195.00, submitted by
Calfon Construction, Inc., and recommended that the contract be awarded to the low
bidder. The engineer's estimate for this project was $1,672,475.00.
_Y1_
.i
06/28/95
Approving Addendum No. 1 to the Moved, seconded and duly cared:
�...� plans and specifications
That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and
specifications for Parallel and Replacement of Portions of Lemon Heights Subtrunk
Sewer, La Colina Drive to Newport Boulevard, Contract No. 7-22, and Manhole Access
Modifications to RA-14 Sewer at Newport Boulevard at Cowan Heights Drive, Contract
No. 7-24, making miscellaneous technical clarifications, be, and is hereby, approved.
Approving Addendum No. 2 to the Moved, seconded and duly carried:
plans and specifications
That Addendum No. 2 to the plans and
specifications for Parallel and Replacement of Portions of Lemon Heights Subtrunk
Sewer, La Colina Drive to Newport Boulevard, Contract No. 7-22, and Manhole Access
Modifications to RA-14 Sewer at Newport Boulevard at Cowan Heights Drive, Contract
No. 7-24, making miscellaneous technical clarifications, be, and is hereby, approved.
Awarding Contract Nos. 7-22 and Moved, seconded and duly cared:
7-24 to Calfon Construction. Inc.
That the Board of Directors hereby adopts
Resolution No. 95-74-7, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and
awarding contract for Parallel and Replacement of Portions of Lemon Heights Subtrunk
Sewer, La Colina Drive to Newport Boulevard, Contract No. 7-22, and Manhole Access
Modifications to RA-14 Sewer at Newport Boulevard at Cowan Heights Drive, Contract
No. 7-24, to Calton Construction, Inc. in the total amount of$1,391,195.00. Said
resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly cared:
Adioumment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so
adjourned at 8:24 p.m.
DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adioumment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so
adjourned at 8:24 p.m.
DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Second reading of proposed Ordinance -
No. 1315 That proposed Ordinance No. 1315, An Ordinance
of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation
District No. 13 of Orange County, California, Establishing Excess Capacity Charge Program, be
read by title only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby,
waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 1315 by title only.
-22-
O6/28/95
DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried by the following
Adoptina Ordinance No 1315 roll call vote:
AYES: John M. Gullixson, Chair, Burnie Dunlap, William G. Steiner, Bob Zemel
NOES: None
ABSENT: Mark A. Murphy
That Ordinance No. 1315, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
No. 13 of Orange County, California, Establishing Excess Capacity Charge Program, be, and is
hereby, adopted.
DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adioumment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so
adjourned at 8:24 p.m.
DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Second readina of Proposed Ordinance
No. 1407 That proposed Ordinance No. 1407, An Ordinance
of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation
District No. 14 of Orange County, California, Establishing Excess Capacity Charge Program, be
read by title only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby,
waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 1407 by title only.
DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried by the following
Adopting Ordinance No. 1407 roll call vote:
AYES: Jim Potts, Chair pro tem, Barry Hammond, William G. Steiner, Peer A. Swan
NOES: None
ABSENT: Mark A. Murphy
That Ordinance No. 1407, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
No. 14 of Orange County, California, Establishing Excess Capacity Charge Program, be, and is
hereby, adopted.
DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duty carried:
Adioumment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so
adjourned at 8:24 p.m.
�..r
-23-
06/28/95
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive and file Summons and Complaint
for Subrogation Recovery, 20th Century That the Summons and Complaint for Subrogation
Insurance Company vs. County Sanitation Recovery, 20th Century Insurance Company vs.
Districts of Orange County, at al.. West County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, at al.,
Orange County Municipal Court, Case West Orange County Municipal Court Case
No. 215248 No. 215248, relative to property damage sustained
in connection with a Districts'vehicle, be, and is
hereby, received and ordered filed; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the District's General Counsel, be, and is hereby, authorized to
appear and defend the interests of the District.
DISTRICT 3
Actions re Los Alamitos County Water
Districts' request for representation on the
Board of Directors of County Sanitation
District No. 3
Receive and file letters dated Moved, seconded and duly carried:
March 9. 1995 and June 8. 1995
That letters dated March 9, 1995 and June 8,
1995 from the Los Alamitos County Water District requesting representation on the
Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3, be, and are hereby, received and
ordered filed.
4.
Presentation by Los Alamitos County The Joint Chair recognized Mr. Joseph Martin,
Water District Director of the Los Alamitos County Water District,
who stated the Water District was requesting
representation on the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3.
Mr. Martin stated the areas served by Los Alamitos County Water District are Los
Alamitos, Seal Beach and the Seal Beach Naval Weapons Station, providing service to
approximately 8,000 sewer connections. In comparison, Midway City Sanitary District
serves Westminster, 25% of Garden Grove and the unincorporated area of Midway City.
However, Midway City Sanitary District has a representative on District No. 3, but Los
Alamitos County Water District does not. He then referred to a letter he received from
the Sanitation Districts which stated that the present organization could be revised to
change the membership if approved by the Board of Directors of District No. 3.
He further stated that every year the Water District sends out an annual report to their
constituents, telling them what new projects are going on, what the budget is, but they
don't hear from the Sanitation Districts. If the Water District was represented on the
Board, they would be able to keep their constituents apprised of projects, problems,
budgets, etc.
It was then pointed out to Mr. Martin that currently District No. 3 has sixteen Directors,
and the areas served by Los Alamitos County Water District has representation on
District No. 3 from the cities and Board of Supervisors. Directors also pointed out that
"d -24-
O6/28/95
back in 1982 a study done by the Grand Jury recommended only one representative
from each agency on the Board to serve and that the Districts have been downsizing the
representation on all Districts' Boards. Recently the total number of active Directors had
been reduced to 30 Directors from 42 members.
Mr. Martin then introduced Art Gold, a Director from the Water District. Mr. Gold stated
that the Grand Jury report had to do with whether multiple water or sanitary districts
were serving the same community, and that the Water District was serving four
communities through one District.
Directors pointed out that representation by the Water District would go against current
Districts' policy in downsizing and that there should not be duplicate representation for
the areas the Water District serves. A representative from each of the cities within their
boundaries already has representation on the Board. The Joint Chair also stated that
one of the challenges of all special districts is to eliminate duplication of efforts.
Denying request of Los Alamitos Moved, seconded and duly carried:
County Water District
That the request of Los Alamitos County Water
District for representation on the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3,
be, and is hereby, denied; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That, as amended by Director Don R. Griffin, annual budgets and
portions of the annual reports be forwarded to Los Alamitos County Water District, based
upon their request, so that there is ongoing communication.
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adioumment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so
adjourned at 8:47 p.m.
Secretary of the and Directors
of County Sanit ' n acts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 1 , 13 and 14
-25-
U
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/26/95 PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 05/31195 POSTING DATE O5/31195
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
144883 AG TECH COMPANY $150,024.31 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9.91
144884 A-Z LOGIC SYSTEMS $197.71 OFFICE MACHINE REPAIRS
1"885 AMERICAN AIR FILTER,INC. $1,274.98 MECHANICAL PARTS
144856 AMERICAN COMPENSATION ASSOC. $695.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION
144687 AMERICAN DIVERSIFIED SILVER $1.485.67 REFUND ECSA DEPOSIT
144888 AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE $1,899.00 TRAINING MATERIALS
144889 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION $3.000.00 EMERGENCY SEWER REPAIRS
144890 ANiXTER-DISTRIBUTION 520.87 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
144891 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL $465.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
1"692 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $2.478.01 NOTICES&ADS
144893 APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS,INC. $2.476.86 LAB SUPPLIES
144894 ABC LABORATORIES $2.560.00 LAB SERVICES
144895 ATKINJONES COMPUTER SERVICE $321.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT
144898 RANDOLPH AUSTIN CO. $674.93 FITTINGS
144897 AWARDS&TROPHIES $26.36 PLAQUES
144898 BKK LANDFILL $2,376.39 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9.91
1"899 BANANA BLUEPRINT $9,600.54 PRINTING M.O.11-07-94
144900 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $274.43 BATTERIES
X 144901 BAKTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. 54.313.52 LAB SUPPLIES
s 144902 BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS $83.84 LAB SUPPLIES
144903 BENZ ENGINEERING,INC. $255.27 COMPRESSOR PARTS
1449M J&H BERGE,INC. $79.33 LAB SUPPLIES
1N905 A BIEDERMAN,INC. $164.79 MECHANICAL PARTS
1"906 BISHOP COMPANY $330.20 TOOLS
1 144907 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $33,840.51 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1.41
~ 144908 BRENNER-FIEDLER&ASSOC.,INC. $592.30 COMPRESSOR PARTS
1N909 MARK E.BRIGHTLY $3,200,W DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL
144910 BRONSON,13RONSON&MCKINNON $64,889.71 LEGAL SERVICES-COUNTY BANKRUPTCY M.O.12-8-94
144911 BUSH&ASSOCIATES,INC. $678.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.5-8.94
144912 CH2M HILL $68,366.86 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-01
1"913 C.L.TECHNOLOGY $720.00 GAS ANALYSIS SERVICES
1"914 CS COMPANY $4,484.36 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
144915 CALFON CONSTRUCTION $78.231.40 CONSTRUCTION 3-38-2
144916 CALTROL,INC. $498.24 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
144917 CALTEX PLASTICS,INC. $346.40 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
144916 CANUS CORPORATION $26,581.95 FIBER OPTIC CABLE
144919 CAPITAL WESTWARD CORP. $45.18 REGULATOR
144920 JOHN CARDILLO ENGINEERS $7.645.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES M.O.3-&95
144921 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS 5431,613.92 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-38,P1-36
144922 CEILCOTE AIR POLLUTION $3.244.00 ELECTRIC PARTS
144923 CENTRAL VALLEY WASTEWATER MGRS $100.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION
144924 CETAC TECHNOLOGIES,INC. $264.54 LAB SUPPLIES
144926 M.C.KENNICUTT $1,671.00 LAB SUPPLIES
144925 CHROME CRANKSHAFT,INC. $1,400.00 PUMP PARTS
144927 COASTAL CHLORINATION $1.00B.00 WATER LINE DISINFECTION
144928 COASTALMOTION $1.332.00 MEMBERSHIP FEES
FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 5120195 PAGE2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 05/31/95 POSTING DATE 05/31195
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
144929 COLD SAWS OF AMERICA,INC. $66.76 WELDING PARTS
144930 COLE-PALMER INSTRUMENT CO. $242.58 LAB SUPPLIES
144931 COLICHANDSONS 588,991.00 CONSTRUCTION M.O.2-8-95
144932 COUCH&SONS $50.262.08 CONSTRUCTION 11-17-1
144933 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $2,467.48 PUMP REPAIRS
1"934 CONNEL GM PARTS I DIV. $139.57 TRUCK PARTS
1"935 CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS $2,335.81 FREIGHT
144936 CONSUMER PIPE $61.20 MECHANICAL PARTS
144937 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC. $456.66 TOOLS
144938 CONTROL DESIGN SUPPLY $332.87 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
144939 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $241.29 TRUCK PARTS
144940 COUNTERPART ENTERPRISES $1,049.35 COMPRESSOR PARTS
144941 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $2.672.78 ELECTRIC PARTS
W942 DAILY PILOT $102.00 NOTICES&ADS
144943 HSKBJECKER 52.951.74 GAUGES
144944 DELTA POINT,INC. $81.32 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
149945 DEZURICK AND/OR CS CO. $13.946.01 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
X 144946 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $3,633.57 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
= 144947 DIVERSIFIED BIOTECH,INC. $33.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES
�-+ 144948 ESP NORTH $396.18 TOOLS
ry
144949 EASTMAN,INC. $6.513.34 OFFICE SUPPLIES
4 144950 ECOANALYSIS,INC. E1,320.00 CONSULTING SERVICES
n 1"951 EDWARDS DIV.OF GS BLDG SYS. $535.49 INSTRUMENT PARTS
1 144952 ENCHANTER,INC. $3,360.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.640-92
N 144953 ENVIROGEN,INC. $1,569.00 PILOT PROJ.EQUIPMENT-BIOTRICKLING FILTER
144954 FMC CORP. $25,153.90 HYDROGEN PEROXIDE M.O.9-14N
1"955 MARSHALL FAIRRES $28.06 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
144956 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $1,820.00 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.D.10.9-91
144957 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $636.80 AIR FREIGHT
1"958 FIRST COMPANY WOR NORTHERN DIST. $156.41 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
144959 FISCHER&PORTER 0O. $38.12 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES
144M FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $1.174.30 LAB SUPPLIES
194961 FISIONS INSTRUMENTS $290.60 LAB SUPPLIES
144962 FLICKINGER CO. $1,309.16 PLUMBING PARTS
144963 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $147.76 PHOTO SUPPLIES
1449CA FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT E216.59 PAINT SUPPLIES
14405 FREEDOM IMAGING $70.72 SERVICE AGREEMENT
144966 CITY OF FULLERTON $900.00 WATER USE
144967 GST,INC. $3,608.94 OFFICE SUPPLIES
144968 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $824.95 LUMBER/HARDWARE
144969 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $182.10 CHEMICALS
144970 GAUGE REPAIR SERVICE $290.00 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS
144971 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $6,658.26 TELEPHONE SERVICES
144972 GIERUCH-MITCHELL,INC. 54,403.65 PUMP PARTS
$
A9 4 GOVERNMENT INSTITUTES,INC. $47.00 PUBLICATION ES -
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/26M PAGE 3
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID O5131195 POSTING DATE 05/31/95
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
144975 W W GRAINGER,INC. $612.59 ELECTRIC PARTS
144978 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $48.38 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
144977 GRASBY S.T.I. $4,225.82 ENGINE PARTS
1"978 DGA CONSULTANTS $8,860.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-&94
144979 MACH COMPANY $300.93 LAB SUPPLIES
144980 HARBOUR ENGINEERING $13.687.62 PUMP PARTS
144981 FREDAHARPER $1,100.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
144982 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $820.10 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
144983 HATCH&KIRK,INC. $1,024.40 ENGINE PARTS
144904 PL HAWN CO,INC. $146.09 FILTERS
144985 HILTI,INC. $1,029.94 TOOLS
144986 HOME DEPOT $209.43 HARDWARE
144987 IRS HUGHES CO,INC. $017.77 PAINT SUPPLIES
144988 ORANGE COUNTY FED.CREDIT UNION $680.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
144909 IBG/MICROBE MASTER,INC. $14,384.63 DIGESTER CLEANING
144990 IDEXX $777.07 LAB SUPPLIES
144991 IPCO SAFETY $3,353.58 SAFETY SUPPLIES
m 144992 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $57,728.07 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11-18-92
Z 144993 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $28.56 CONNECTORS
1449M ISI INFORTEXT $1,593.64 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
144995 INORGANIC VENTURES,INC. $735.51 LAB SUPPLIES
144M J2 PRINTING SERVICES $505.35 PRINTING
144997 J.D.I.TECHNOLOGIES,INC. $2.613.25 OFFICE SUPPLIES
]? 144998 JAMISON ENGINEERING $24.434.83 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
W 144999 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY. $887,69 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
145000 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO. $58.34 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
145001 JOHNSON CONTROLS.INC. $685.63 ELECTRIC PARTS
14500E JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $131.15 ELECTRICPARTS
145003 THE KEITH COMPANIES $234.70 ENGINEERING SERVICES 3.38R
145004 KING BEARING,INC. $556.65 MACHINE SUPPLIES
145005 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $2,420.99 HARDWARE
145008 L A CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $358.75 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES
1450D7 LAUNDROMAT $45.85 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145008 LAW/CRANDAL,INC. $5,242.50 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.7-13-94
145009 LIMITOROUE CORP. $2,241.17 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS
145010 LOCAL AGENCY $450.00 LAFCO FEES
145011 MPS $15.30 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
146012 MACOMCO $577.20 SERVICE AGREEMENT
145013 MAG-TROL,INC. $68.47 ELECTRIC PARTS
146014 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $199.17 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
145015 MCKENNA ENGR.&EQUIP. $142.01 PUMP PARTS
145016 MECHANICAL DRIVES CO. $248.18 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
145017 MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. $3,496.27 GAUGES
145018 MICRO MOTION $522.25 INSTRUMENT PARTS
146019 MIDWAY MFG.&MACHINING $6.363.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS
145020 MINNESOTA WESTERN VISUAL PRES. $85.00 OFFICE REPAIRS
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/26/95 PAGE 4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 05131/95 POSTING DATE 05/31/95
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
145021 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3,347.S5 UNIFORM RENTALS
145022 MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION $61,772.98 CONSTRUCTION 14-1-1A
145023 MONITOR LABS $9190 FITTINGS
145024 MONITOR PUBLISHING CO. $213.75 SUBSCRIPTION
145025 MONTGOMERY WATSON $1,664.12 AIR TOXIC$PROJECT M..12-12-90
145026 MORTON SALT $500.62 SALT
145027 MORON INDUSTRIES,INC. $359.32 FITTINGS
145028 MOTOROLA,INC. $513.96 COMMUNICATIONS SUPPLIES
145029 NASCO $308.76 LAB SUPPLIES
145030 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES,INC. $9.500.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES
145031 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $1,282.81 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
145032 NEUTRON $1.742.36 ANIONIC POLYMER M.O.S.10-94
145033 CUMMINS CAL PACIOMAN $45.23 ELECTRIC PARTS
145034 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $161.13 SAFETY GLASSES
145035 ON TECHNOLOGY $108.00 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
145036 ORANGE COUNTY FARM SUPPLY $1.529.71 CHEMICALS
f1l 145037 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE SBA08.12 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
X 145038 ORANGE COURIER $151.05 COURIER SERVICES
S 145039 ORANGE VALVE 6 FITTING CO. $707.65 FITTINGS
14SD40 OXYGEN SERVICE $3.663.04 SPECIALTY GASES
145041 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $9,091.19 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP
145042 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT $88,956.00 GAP WATER USE M.0.6393
n 145043 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $2,338.20 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
I 145044 PACIFIC PARTS $13,994.14 INSTRUMENT PARTS/OFFICE EQUIPMENT
146045 PACIFIC PROCESS EQUIPMENT,INC. $314.93 PUMP PARTS
145046 PACIFIC BELL $1,247.70 TELEPHONE SERVICES
1450/7 PACIFIC LAND DEVELOPMENT $2,232.50 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145048 PACIFIC WATER CONDITIONING CO. $598.00 EQUIPMENT RENTALS
145049 PAGENET $1,043.49 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
145050 PARAGON CABLE $36.78 CABLE SERVICES
145051 PARALLAXEDUCATION $4.740.89 TRAINING REGISTRATION
145052 PARKER DIVING SERVICE $34.895.00 OCEAN OUTFALL REPAIRS M.0.4-26-95
145053 PARTS UNLIMITED $773.91 TRUCK PARTS
145054 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $3,524.89 REIMS.PETTY CASH,TRAINING B TRAVEL
145055 PHARMACIA BIOTECH,INC. $460.49 LAB REPAIRS
145056 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $104,616.60 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.5b91
145057 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS $36,337.67 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
145058 PLAINS TRUEVALUE HARDWARE $19.37 HARDWARE
145059 POLYPURE,INC. $15,874.42 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-92
145080 POSTAGE BY PHONE $5,000.00 POSTAGE
14M HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $96.00 ICE
145D82 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE IND. $nS.00 SOIL TESTING
145063 PROMINENT FLUID CONTROL $799.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
145064 QUALITY BUILDING SUPPLY $167.44 BUILDING SUPPLIES
C INSTRUMENTS VICES,INC. $569.76 INSTRUMENT
ING REGISTRATION
45M R8R PARTS
( C t
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/26195 PAGE 5
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 05/31/95 POSTING DATE 05/31/95
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
145D67 REBIS $11.693.82 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
145068 REISH MARINE STUDIES,INC. $580.00 OCEAN MONITORING
145069 REMEDYTEMP $1,511.80 TEMPORARY SERVICES
145070 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $1.991.83 VALVES
145071 ROBINSON FERTILIZER $1,411.31 CHEMICALS
145072 ROSEMOUNT ANALYTICAL,INC. $114.56 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
145073 RYAN-NERCO $574.34 METAL
145074 SARBS-PDC $1,800.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION
145075 SANWA BANK $113,595.17 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION 14-I-1-A
145076 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INPL $553.703.96 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6A-94
145077 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $1,764.04 SPECIALTY GASES
145078 SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS,INC. $345.00 LAB SUPPLIES
145079 SEA COAST DESIGNS $144.60 OFFICE REPAIRS
145080 SEARS ROEBUCK 8 CO. $359.80 REFRIGERATOR
145081 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $478.41 HARDWARE
145082 SHURELUCK SALES $4.701.82 TOOLSMARDWARE
145083 M.LEE SMITH PUBLISHERS&ASSN. $487.00 SUBSCRIPTION
X 145064 SOCOASTAIRQUALITY $3,481.80 PERMIT FEES
= 145055 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY $60.00 PERMIT FEES
145086 SOUTH COAST WATER $140.00 LAB SUPPLIES
lA 146087 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. $16,114.10 POWER
--q 1450BB SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $56.274.03 NATURAL GAS
n 145089 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. $28,015.44 DIESEVUNLEADED FUEL
146090 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER $2,653.63 DRINKING WATERMOOLER RENTALS
In 145091 WESTALLOY,INC. $236.18 WELDING SUPPLIES
145D92 SPECTRUM CHEMICAL $166.71 LAB SUPPLIES
145093 SPEX INDUSTRIES,INC. $2,455.46 LAB SUPPLIES
145094 SQUARE DICRISP AUTOMATION SYST. $95,883.03 SOFTWARE LICENSE M.O.7-13A4
145095 STERLING ART $138.10 OFFICE SUPPLIES
145096 SUMMIT STEEL $1,900.45 METAL
145097 SUNSET INDUSTRIAL PARTS $186.73 PUMP PARTS
145M SUPERB ONE-HOUR PHOTO $11.84 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
145099 SUPER CHEM CORP. $406.82 CHEMICALS
145100 TCH ASSOCIATES $491.91 LAB SUPPLIES
145101 THERMO JARRELL ASH CORP. $1.308.72 LAB SUPPLIES
145102 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $322.42 MECHANICAL PARTS
145103 TOLEDO SCALE CORP. $1.049.81 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS
145104 TONYS LOCK 8 SAFE SERVICE $651.95 LOCKS 8 KEYS
145105 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES $999.00 TRAVEL SERVICES M.0.6-6-94
145106 TREBOR ELECTRONICS $559.48 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
145107 TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY,INC. $3,455.84 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.O.5-11-94
145108 TRUESDAIL LABS $1,064.25 LAB SERVICES
145109 JG TUCKER 8 SON,INC. $814.83 INSTRUMENT PARTS
145110 TUSTIN DODGE 538.19 TRUCK PARTS
145111 TUTHILL CORPORATION $15.941.52 MECHANICAL PARTS
145112 URISA $90.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/26/95 PAGE 6
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 05/31/95 POSTING DATE 05/31/95
WARRANT NO. VENDOR
145113 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $318.00 LAB SUPPLIES
145114 UNISOURCEWOR BUTLER PAPER $644.13 OFFICE SUPPLIES
145116 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $814.67 PARCEL SERVICES
145116 VWR SCIENTIFIC $743.55 LAB SUPPLIES
145117 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $683.57 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
145118 VERNES PLUMBING $3,002.30 PLUMBING SERVICES
145119 VERTEX SYSTEMS $1,252.71 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT
145120 VILLAGE NURSERIES $297.67 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES
145121 CARL WARREN&CO. $186.21 UAB.CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR
145122 WATER ENVIRONMENTAL FED. $261.50 PUBLICATIONS
145123 WAXIE $475.39 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
145124 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $30,5%.56 CAUSTIC SODA&HYPOCHLORIDE M 0.8-12-92&4-13-N
145125 WEST-CITE SUPPLY CO. $732.36 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
145128 WfTEG $172.40 LAB SUPPLIES
145127 ROURKE,WOODRUFF&SPRADLIN $55,221.85 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.2-19-92
145128 WORDPERFECT $195.00 PUBLICATION
145120 XEROX CORP. $1,060.70 COPIER LEASES
X 145130 RICHARD B.EDGAR $200.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
2
�--i 2,725,516.88
LA
,--I
D SUMMARY AMOUNT
I
T #2 OPER FUND 10.462.23
02 CAP FAC FUND 779.00
03 OPER FUND 8.193.31
93 CAP FAC FUND 174.384.30
#5 OPER FUND 6,901.50
#7 OPER FUND 4.048.75
#7 CAP FAC FUND 4.610.29
#11 OPER FUND 2,018.34
#11 CAP FAC FUND 51,001.99
#14 OPER FUND 48.00
#14 CAP FAC FUND 186,164.03
#5&6 OPEN FUND 128.97
#5&6 CAP FAC FUND 2,612.51
#6&7 OPER FUND 2D8.80
#7&14 OPER FUND 976.09
JT OPER FUND 1,404,436.38
CORP 626.873.39
SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND 15,309.90
J7 DIST WORKING CAPITAL 22S361A0
2,725,516.98 ' '
FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 6M9/95 PAGE1
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 06/14/95 POSTING DATE 08/14/95
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
146157 AA EQUIPMENT $861.27 PUMP
145156 AG TECH COMPANY $88.274.21 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91
145159 AT&T-UNIPLAN SERVICE $2,390,92 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
145150 A T&T-MEGACOM SERVICE $958.94 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
145161 AT&T-FAX SERVICE $1,041.42 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
145162 ADAMS PRECISION INSTRUMENTATION $142.77 INSTRUMENT PARTS
145183 ADVANCED MFG.INSTITUTE $795.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION
145164 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS,INC. $36.074.40 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.O.8-9-89
145165 ALLIED ELECTRONICS $139.00 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
145166 AMERIDATA $4,51&70 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
145167 AMERICAN SIGMA $4N 79 OPERATING SUPPLIES
145168 AMSCO $40607 SERVICE AGREEMENT
145169 BLAKE P.ANDERSON $79.97 REIMBURSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE
145170 APCO VALVE&PRIMER CORP. $3,825.13 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
145171 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $6.330.25 NOTICES&ADS
145172 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $3.093.50 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
145173 ABC LABORATORIES $235.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
m 145174 ARI20NA INSTRUMENT $175.37 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
X 145175 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE,INC. $282.20 RECYCLABLE MATERIALS REMOVAL
2
144178 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING E3,408.41 PAYROLL SERVICES
00 145177 AWARDS&TROPHIES $412.29 PLAQUES
-1 145170 BKK LANDFILL $2,793.38 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.OAO-9-91
145179 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $1,161.68 BATTERIES
�j 145100 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $3,193.37 LAB SUPPLIES
I--' 146181 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $270.80 TRUCK WASH TICKETS
145182 J&H BERGE,INC. $79.64 LAB SUPPLIES
145183 BETA TECHNOLOGY,INC. $53.64 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS
145184 BID TECH NET,INC. $3.00 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
145185 BLACK&VEATCH $62,944.67 ENGINEERING SERVICES P146
145186 BRONSON,BRONSON&MCKINNON $25,855.40 LEGAL SERVICES-COUNTY BANKRUPTCY M.0.1241-94
145187 BNI BOOKS $153.64 BOOKS
145/88 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. $946.05 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
145189 CEM CORPORATION $272.13 LAB SUPPLIES
146190 CEPA $2,142.06 LAB SUPPLIES
145191 C.P.I. $755.87 LAB SUPPLIES
145192 CPRA REGISTRAR $1,012.00 WORKSHOP REGISTRATION
145193 1995 CONFERENCE,CWPCA,INC. $190.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION
145124 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $536.10 SERVICE AGREEMENT
145195 CALIFORNIA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE $105.36 PUBLICATION
145196 CANUS CORPORATION $39,703.64 FIBER OPTIC CABLE
145197 CAPITAL WESTWARD CORP. $136.86 REGULATOR
145198 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $6,752A4 ENGINEERING SERVICES P143,P1-38
145199 CEILCOTE AIR POLLUTION $142.58 ELECTRIC PARTS
145200 CENTURY SAFETY INST.&SUPPLY $160.00 SAFETY SUPPLIES
145201 CHEMWEST,INC. $414.08 PUMP PARTS
145202 CLARK CONSULTANTS $390.00 ELECTRICAL CONSULTING
FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6IMS PAGE
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID OB/14/95 POSTING DATE 06/14M5
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
145203 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $75.51 SERVICE AGREEMENT
145204 COUCH AND SONS $26,033.22 EMERGENCY REPAIRS 3-35
145205 COMPUSERVE $292.39 COMPUTER SERVICES
145206 CONSOLIDATED PLASTICS CO. $323.35 TOOLS
145207 CONSTRUCTION FABRICATORS,INC. $1,644.70 MECHANICAL PARTS
145208 CONSUMER PIPE $954.01 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
145209 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC. $345.79 ELECTRIC PARTS
145210 CONTRACTORS EQUIPMENT CO. $156.23 FITTINGS
145211 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $2,732.44 ENGINE PARTS
145212 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $306.05 TRUCK PARTS
146213 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $1.368.76 ELECTRIC PARTS
145214 DAILY PILOT $96.00 NOTICES 9 ADS
145215 DATASTORM $/53.00 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
145216 DAVIS INSTRUMENTS $506.95 INSTRUMENT PARTS
145217 HSKIDECKER $1.324.75 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
145218 DEZURICK AND/OR CS CO. $10,033.89 VALVES
145219 THE DICKSON COMPANY $106.00 ELECTRIC PARTS
X 145220 SYCON CORP. $1,198.29 INSTRUMENTPARTS
= 145221 DIPPER BAN $80.00 PORTABLE TOILET RENTALS
�--i 146222 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $1,856.00 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE
145223 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $899.10 PAINT SUPPLIES
y 145224 E.C.S. $267.00 PUBLICATION
145225 ESP NORTH $690.44 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
145226 EASTMAN,INC. $2,960.14 OFFICE SUPPLIES
N 145227 ECOANALYSIS,INC. $5,220.50 CONSULTING SERVICES
145228 ENCHANTER,INC. $3,360.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6-10.92
145229 ENSYS,INC. $325.40 LAB SUPPLIES
145230 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $1.096.50 LAB SERVICES
145231 EQUESTRIAN FORGE $1,098.66 PLAQUES
145232 FMC CORP. $33,588.35 HYDROGEN PEROXIDE M.O.9-14.94
145233 FST SAND AND GRAVEL,INC. $249.88 ROAD BASE MATERIALS
145234 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $3.877.50 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91
145235 FIRST COMPANYWOR NORTHERN DIST. $195.51 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
145236 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $1,935.00 LAB SUPPLIES
145237 FISIONS INSTRUMENTS $1,271.78 LAB SUPPLIES
145238 FLICKINGERCO. $3,634.20 VALVES
145239 CLIFFORD A.FORKERT $2,620.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.641-94
145240 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $91.68 PHOTO SUPPLIES
145241 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $11,276.60 WATER USE
145242 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $193.61 PAINT SUPPLIES
145243 THE FOXBORO CO. $4.149.01 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
145244 CITY OF FULLERTON $139.23 WATER USE
145245 GST,INC. $529.94 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
145246 GAUGE REPAIR SERVICE $684.15 INSTRUMENT PARTS
C15247 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. ( $216.36 TELEPHONE SERVICES
.5240 GRAHAM MANUFACTURING CO. ` $111.79 PUMP PARTS
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6109/95 PAGE 3
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 06114/95 POSTING DATE 06114/95
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
146249 GRASSY S.T.I. $324.65 ENGINE PARTS
145250 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $294.16 OFFICE SUPPLIES
145251 GREAT LAKES INSTRUMENTS,INC. $22,691.32 INSTRUMENT PARTS
145252 DGA CONSULTANTS $2.730.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6894
145253 DAVID R.GRIFFIN $164.306.85 LEGAL SERVICES-TECHITE PIPE M.0.9-14-94
145254 HACH COMPANY $2,003.10 LAB SUPPLIES
145255 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $1,403.92 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
145266 HATCH&KIRK,INC. $575.07 TRUCK PARTS
145257 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS $1.925.00 CONTAINER RENTALS
145258 PL HAWN CO,INC. $8,889.39 INSTRUMENT PARTS
1452N HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT $2,053.33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN.
145260 HOLMES&NARVER,INC. $33.323.52 ENGINEERING SERVICES Pld
145261 HOME DEPOT $263.11 HARDWARE
145262 PIS HUGHES CO,INC. $1,018.80 PAINT SUPPLIES
145263 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $19.65 WATER USE
1452" IPCO SAFETY $1.992.49 SAFETY SUPPLIES
145265 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $110,090.27 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.11-1&92
fn 145266 IMPULSE ENTERPRISE $404.99 LAB SUPPLIES
2 145267 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $1.480.73 CONNECTORS
W 145268 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $703.62 BATTERIES
145269 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $15.13 WATER USE
—I 145270 J2 PRINTING SERVICES $602.04 OFFICE SUPPLIES
LA 145271 AT COMPUTER SOURCE,INC. $818.90 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
I 146272 JAMISON ENGINEERING $8,030.33 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
W 146273 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY. $233.47 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
145274 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO. $1,997.07 GAUGE
145275 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $410.06 PAINT SUPPLIES
145276 KALLEEN'S COMPUTER PRODUCTS $62.80 OFFICE SUPPLIES
145277 KEYE PRODUCTIVITY CENTER $139.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION
145275 KING BEARING,INC. $1,515.84 MACHINE SUPPLIES
145279 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $1,752.34 TOOLS
145250 L A CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $57.59 SERVICE AGREEMENT
145261 LATRONICS $2.527.67 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
145282 K.P.LINDSTROM.INC. $1,475.64 CONSULTING SERVICES-ENVIR.M.0.12-9.90
145283 SOHO-LYNCH CORP. $136.61 JANITORIAL SERVICES
145284 MBC APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL $974.10 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6.10-92
145285 MAGNETEK $5,8W.00 SEROCEAGREEMENT
145286 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $103,477.00 CONSTRUCTION P2<2-2
145287 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $038.05 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
145288 MATT-CHLOR,INC. $1,815.69 VALVE PARTS
145289 MAVERIK,INC. $2.887.28 CRANE REPAIRS
145290 CHUCK MCRANEY $511.14 REIMBURSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE
145291 MEDLIN CONTROLS,INC. $3,925.84 INSTRUMENT PARTS
145292 METRA CORPORATION $1,205.40 INSTRUMENT PARTS
145293 MICROSOFT PRESS $169.57 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
1462M MISSION ABRASIVE SUPPLIES $996.89 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 6/09/95 PAGE4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 06/14/95 POSTING DATE 06/14195
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
146295 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3.182.67 UNIFORM RENTALS
145296 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO. $1.214.00 ELECTRIC PARTS
145297 MONITOR LABS $1,616,86 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
145298 NASCO $617.60 LAB SUPPLIES
145299 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $70.35 SAFETY FILM RENTALS
14530D NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $67.17 PUBLICATION
145301 NATIONAL SEMINARS GROUP $594.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION
145302 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $7,356,05 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
145303 NEUTRON $8.693.11 ANIONIC POLYMER M.0.8-10-84
145304 NEW HORIZONS COMPUTER CENTER $60000 TRAINING REGISTRATION
145305 NEWARK ELECTRONICS $22543 US SUPPLIES
145306 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $5.29 WATER USE
145307 NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL $35000 NEW HEALTH ACCOUNT
145308 OI CORPORATION $5,00 LAB SUPPLIES
145309 THE OHMART CORP. $554.41 INSTRUMENT PARTS
145310 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. $135.79 TRUCK PARTS
T11 145311 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $2,787.54 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
X 145312 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. $1,178.93 FITTINGS
145313 OXYGEN SERVICE $2.207.26 SPECIALTY GASES
by 145314 COUNTY OF ORANGE $5.682.71 SERVICE AGREEMENT
146318 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $17,543.61 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP
145318 COUNTY OF ORANGE $104.00 PERMIT FEES
CO 146317 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT $16.175.44 GAP WATER USE M.0.6-9-93
1 145310 COUNTY OF ORANGE HEALTH CARE $1215.00 SEWAGE SPILL REIMBURSEMENT
r 146319 P&D ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES $1,336.91 ENVIRONMENTAL SURVEY
146320 PSOC(POOL SUPPLY OF OC) $79.24 OPERATING SUPPLIES
145321 PACIFIC PARTS $8.843.39 INSTRUMENT PARTS
145322 PACIFIC BELL $75.74 TELEPHONE SERVICES
145323 PAINE WEBBER $25.144.69 COP REMARKET FEES
145324 PALMIERI.TYLER,WIENER, S40.0D LEGAL SERVICES M.O.S.12-91
145325 PARKHOUSE TIRE CO. $909.24 TIRES
145326 PASCAL B LUDWIG $8,753.50 CONSTRUCTION PIA2
145327 PERFORMANCE TRAINING ASSOC. $590.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION
145328 PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION $3,085.69 LAB SUPPLIES
145329 PERVO PAINT $148.48 PAINT SUPPLIES
145330 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $5.228.54 REIMS.PETTY CASH,TRAINING&TRAVEL
145331 PIERCE COMPANIES $398.98 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145332 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS $5,572.03 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
145333 POLY FABRICS $2.068.80 PVC LINER
145334 POLYMETRICS,INC. $1,262.75 LAB SUPPLIES
145335 POLYPURE,INC. $28,647.43 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3.11-92
145336 POWER SYSTEMS S47.45 ENGINE PARTS
145337 PRITCHETT AND ASSOCIATES,INC. $201.50 PUBLICATION
38
SERVICE
ND. 12,121,00 SOIL TESTING
C fi RICIT INC.
S ICR CONSULTING
TSSERVICES M.O.B
14 RPM ELECTRIMOTORS $4,852.64 ELECTRIC MOTOR PA -
FUNDING 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6I09G5 PAGE 5
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID O6114195 POSTING DATE O8114/95
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
145341 R 6 R INSTRUMENTS $82.08 ELECTRIC PARTS
145342 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $1.715.43 TRASH REMOVAL
145343 REGISTRAR,ABWMA $750.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION
145344 REMEDYTEMP $3.899.58 TEMPORARY PERSONNEL SERVICES
145345 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $3,779.87 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
145346 RENOLD,INC. $95.19 MECHANICAL PARTS
145347 HOWARD RIDLEY CO. $6.900.00 BUILDING REPAIRS
145348 RM MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL $12.139.24 INSTRUMENT PARTS
145349 MILTON RIVERA $13,044.00 DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL
145350 ROSEMOUNT ANALYTICAL,INC. $114.55 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
14051 SAFETY CARE,INC. $193.96 SAFETY FILM RENTALS
145352 SANCON ENGINEERING,INC. $16,987.32 ENGINEERING SERVICES
145353 R.CRAIG SCOTT B ASSOC. $10.231.28 LEGAL SERVICES,PERSONNEL
145354 CITY OF SEAL BEACH $362.30 WATER USE
145355 SEIKO INSTRUMENTS $76.00 LAB SUPPLIES
145366 SHURELUCK SALES $8.532.04 TOOLS/HARDWARE
145357 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO. $36.69 LAB SUPPLIES
m 145358 SIMON S SCHUSTER $84.86 PUBLICATION
X 145359 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $401.50 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS
2
145380 SMTTH-EMERY CO. $475.00 SOIL TESTING M.0.7-13-94
145361 SOUTH COAST WATER $375.00 LAB SUPPLIES
-I 145362 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO. $60,582.97 POWER
145363 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. $16.933.94 POWER
�j 145354 SO.CAL,GAS.CO. $4.005.99 NATURAL GAS
111 145365 SOUTH PACIFIC MARBLE S TILE $1,426.16 GROUNDSKEEPING SUPPLIES
145366 SOUTHWEST SCIENTIFIC $927.81 LAB SUPPLIES
145367 SPECIAL PLASTIC SYSTEMS,INC. $946.92 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
145368 STERLING ART $50.14 OFFICE SUPPLIES
145369 SUMMIT STEEL $2,175.69 METAL
145370 SUNSET FORD $273.21 TRUCK PARTS
145371 TAYLOR INDUSTRIAL SOFTWARE $150.00 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
145372 TONYS LOCK&SAFE SERVICE $593.48 LOCKS 8 KEYS
145373 TOSHIBA INTERNATIONAL $76.25 INSTRUMENT PARTS
145374 $0 CALIF TRANE SERVICE $4.384.14 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
145375 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES $2,628.60 TRAVEL SERVICES M.O.BA-94
145376 TRIBEST VISUAL DISPLAY $440.00 PROJECTOR SCREEN REPAIR
145377 TRUCK PARTS SUPPLY $310.74 TRUCK PARTS
145378 TRUESDAIL LABS $4,732.98 LAB SERVICES
145379 JG TUCKER S SON,INC. $2,122.99 INSTRUMENT PARTS
145380 UNISOURCEWOR BUTLER PAPER $395.30 OFFICE SUPPLIES
145381 DATAVAULTAIS SAFE DEPOSIT CORP. $104.00 SAFE DEPOSIT BOX
145382 VWR SCIENTIFIC $860.67 LAB SUPPLIES
145363 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $718.95 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
145354 VARIAN ASSOCIATES,INC. $2,647.10 LAB SUPPLIES
145385 VERNIFS PLUMBING $430.00 PLUMBING SERVICES
145386 VILLAGE NURSERIES $113A1 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES
I
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6I0995 PAGE 6
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 08/14/95 POSTING DATE 0114415
WARRANT NO. VENDOR
145387 WATER ENVIRONMENT FED. $187.25 LAB SUPPLIES
145388 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $57,869.12 CAUSTIC SODA&HYPOCHLORIDE M.O.8-12-92&4-13-94
145389 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $439.73 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
145390 WESTRUX INTERNATIONAL $243.62 TRUCK PARTS
145391 XEROX CORP. $11.428.57 COPIER LEASES
1,372,11U.62
SUMMARY AMOUNT
#1 CONSTR.FUND 85,032.64
#2 OPER FUND 2,983,38
#2 CAP FAC FUND 38,396.73
02 CONSTR.FUND 10,646A0
m 93 OPER FUND 30,421.69
X 63 CAP FAC FUND 1B9,620.35
._. 03 CONSTR.FUND 10,095.84
tO 05 OPER FUND 3,462.41
#S CONSTR.FUND 995.82
08 OPER FUND 1,430.33
t" 06 CAP FAC FUND 1.700.00
T
08 CONSTR.FUND 271.79
#7 OPER FUND 3,558.93
#1 CAP FAC FUND 142.58
#7 CONSTR.FUND 764.86
#11 OPER FUND 17.986.99
#11 CAP FAC FUND 2.139.98
#11 CONSTR.FUND 337.14
#14 OPER FUND 17,295.25
#5&6 OPER FUND 2,051.88
#8&7 OPER FUND 2,662.25
#7&14 OPER FUND 5,239.14
JT OPER FUND 536,073.30
CORP 270,677.09
SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND 19,976.94
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL 198.842.70
(! 1,372,804.62
ti
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
JULY 26, 1995
Agenda Item (9): consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying
payment of claims of the joint and individual
Districts (each Director shall be called only once
and that vote will be regarded as the same for each
District represented unless a Director expresses a
desire to vote differently for any District).
Summary
See attached listing of claim payments.
and
Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of payment of claims listing.
JAWP�GB 74
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE MIM5 PAGE1
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 00135N5 POSTING DATE DIWM5
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
145416 AC DELCO SYSTEMS $812.11 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145417 AGX CORPORATION $1,628.17 GAUGE
145418 ASR ANALYSIS $516.50 PUMP ANALYSIS
146419 ATM AA,INC. $765,00 LAB SERVICES
145420 AT&T-PROWATTS $151.89 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
145421 ADVANCED MFG.INSTITUTE $1,590.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION-MICE PLANNING&SCHEDULING
145422 ALBERTSONS MARKET M04 $221.02 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
141M23 ALLTEK CIRCUIT,INC. $1,940.66 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145424 AMERIDATA $1168.01 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
14U25 AMERICAN AIR FILTER,INC. $1.217.56 FILTERS
145428 AMERICAN POWER PRODUCTS $781.77 TRUCK PARTS
146427 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION 84,5DDBD SEWER REPAIRS
145426 ANLKTER-DISTRIBUTION $8.155.77 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
145429 ABC LABORATORIES $1,395.00 LAB SERVICES
14MM AQUATIC CENTER $1.020.W SAFETY SUPPLIES
145431 ARROWHEAD ELECTRIC CORP. $406.92 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
145432 ARROWHEAD PRODUCTS $1,323.05 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145433 ASSOCIATED VACUUM TECH.,INC. $045.98 PUMP PARTS
145434 AMSA $425.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION-AMSA TECHNICAL CONF.
14MS ATKIWJONES COMPUTER SERVICE $XH.30 SERVICEAGREEMENT
1464M AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $199.77 PAYROLLSERVICES
145437 BANANA BLUEPRINT $9,392.96 PRINNNGM.0.11-07-94
145438 BFRTLETT CENTER 5024.41 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145439 BAUERCOMPRESSOR $139.12 COMPRESSOR PARTS
14WO BARTER EDWARDS $1,550.72 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145441 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $1,890B0 LAB SUPPLIES
145042 BONA-RUES $371.68 TRUCK PARTS
145443 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $24,834.86 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-7-1.3W
145444 BRENNER-FIEDLER&ASSOC..INC. $296.15 COMPRESSOR PARTS
14WS BRISTOL INDUSTRIES 5970.00 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
146446 BUDGET JANITORIAL $3,330.00 JANITORIAL SERVICES
145407 CS COMPANY $162.20 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
146448 CAUPON CONSTRUCTION $352.136.00 CONSTRUCTION IW2
14549 CAL-PAC CHEMICAL CO.,INC. $363.31 CHEMICALS
145450 CALIFORNIAAUTOMATICGATE $1,101.72 SERVICEAGREEMENT
145451 CALIFORNIA FINEBLANKING CORP. $4.400.61 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145452 JOHN D.CASE&ASSOC. $995.00 SECURITY CONSULTANT
145453 CENTURY SAFETY INST.&SUPPLY $4.250,74 SAFETY SUPPLIES
14MM CERFNET $37.40 COMPUTER SERVICES
145455 CHANDLER UOUID ASSET NOW. 52,100.00 INVESTMENT CONSULTANT M.0.24495
145456 CIMCO $913.90 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145457 CINEDOME THEATRES $228.90 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
14USS COAST RUBBER STAMP $90.17 OFFICE SUPPLIES
14UN COUCH&SONS $85.120.00 CONSTRUCTION 11-17-1
145400 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $1.41080 FITTINGS
14UB1 COMPUSA.INC. $312.45 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
FUND NO 9199 - .rt DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE MIM5 PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID OM&M5 POSTING DATE W12895
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
145482 CONNEL GM PARTS I DIV. $262.01 TRUCK PARTS
145463 CON-WAY WESTERN EXPRESS $113,14 FREIGHTCHARGES
145464 CONSUMER PIPE $49.94 MECHANICAL PARTS
145465 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $1,118.62 INSTRUMENT PARTS
145468 CORANADO SQUARE S1,45D.20 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145467 COUNTERPARTENTERPRISES $2,I07.14 COMPRESSOR PARTS
14548E COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC S1,263% ELECTRIC PARTS
145469 CHARLES P.CROWLEY,CO. $2,570.74 INSTRUMENT PARTS
145470 CUSTOM ENAMELERS,INC. 61,42L11 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145471 SWRCWAFRS $1,00000 MEMBERSHIPFEE
145472 DATA ELECTRONICS SER. $350.94 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145Q3 DELTA DENTAL PUN OF CALIF. 948,01955 DENTAL INSURANCE PLAN M.0.1-12-94
145474 DEL TACO RS 61,77L84 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145475 DENWSRESTAURANT81S09 E481.19 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145476 DEZURICK MDIOR CS CO. $4,232.11 VALVES
145477 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. S5,180.D0 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
14547E DIGITAL LEARNING CENTER $6.780,00 TRAINING REGISTRATION-SUPPORTING WINDOWS NT
145478 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $999,49 PAINTSUPPLIES
14MBO DWYER INSTRUMENT,INC. $218.79 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
145481 ESP NORTH $508.74 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
1454N EATON CORP.NSC PRODUCTS $304.11 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145483 EDWARDS DIV.OF GS BLDG SYS. $146.14 SAFETY SUPPLIES
145484 ELECT AIR TOOL CO. $8.711.82 MECHANICAL PARTS
145485 ENCHANTER,INC. $3,92600 OCEANMONRORINGM.O.6-W92
145488 EVANS CONSOLES $23.020.79 COMPUTER SOFTWARE CONSULTANT
145487 MARSHALL FAIRRES $2608 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
14MM FARRSALESBSERVICE $608.14 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
145489 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $335.97 FILTERS
14UN FISCHER B PORTER CO. 5606.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS
145487 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $553.33 LAB SUPPLIES
145492 FLUORAMICS,INC. $312.56 OPERATING SUPPLIES
145493 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $81.81 PHOTO SUPPLIES
145494 THEFOXBOROCO. S1,733.85 INSTRUMENT PARTS
145495 FRANCE COMPRESSOR PRODUCTS $11,599.27 COMPRESSOR PARTS
145490 DST,INC. S4,613.88 OFFICE SUPPLIES
145497 GSF ENERGY,INC. S4.W3.81 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
14UN GALIADE CHEMICAL,INC. $176.97 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145499 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $1,734.28 LUMBERAHARDWARE
145M GMRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY S438.39 CHEMICALS
1455D1 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $716.88 ELECTRIC PARTS
145502 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. 58,962.08 TELEPHONE SERVICES
145503 GEORGE B SONS COIN-OP LAUNDRY $210.00 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145504 GIERLIC"ITCHELL,INC. $2.957.29 MECHANICAL PARTS
145505 GRAHAM MANUFACTURING CO.,INC. $509.88 PUMP PARTS
145506 GRASBY S.T.I. E569.20 INSTRUMENTPARTS
mW7 GREATAMERICANPRINNNG S2,070.05 OFFICE SUPPLIES
C
FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE WV95 PAGES
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 08128195 POSTING DATE 06128195
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
145508 DAVID M.GRIFFITH S ASSOC. 813,600.00 PROF.SERV.-EXECUTIVE SEARCH
145508 H KOCH S SONS $83.15 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145510 HA PENNY INN ANAHEIM $660.41 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145511 HACH COMPANY $105,64 LAB SUPPLIES
145512 FREDA HARPER 61,19000 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
145513 HATCH 8 KIRK,INC. $2.090.94 MECHANICAL PARTS
145514 PL HAWN CO,INC. $30131 FILTERS
145515 HOME DEPOT 840613 HARDWARE
145516 HUGHESAIRCRAFT $01.66 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145517 HUNTINGTON SUPPLY 8134.69 HARDWARE
145518 ORANGE COUNTY FED.CREDIT UNION $68000 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
14019 ICN BIOMEDICAUS,INC. $284.85 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145520 IEEE SERVICE CENTER-C87 $91,60 PUBLICATION
146521 IPCO SAFETY $18,235,91 SAFETY SUPPLIES
145522 ISLUACONFERENCE 8525.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION
145523 ITT CANNON ELECTRIC 5453.84 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145524 IMPERIALWESTCHEMICAL $46,38039 FERRIC CHLORIDE MCA 1-18-92
t45525 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $2,217.09 CONNECTORS
145528 INTEC PRODUCTS,INC. $1.702.97 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
1455V INTERSTATE ELECTRONICS CORP. WIS25 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145528 IRVINERANCHWATERDISTRICT $31.64 WATER USE
145529 J2 PRINTING SERVICES $350.19 PRINTING
145630 JAMISON ENGINEERING $11.178.12 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
145531 GREATWESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY. $1,252.84 JANITORUALSUPPLIES
145532 JT LEE INVESTMENT $26922 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145533 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $633.00 ELECTRIC PARTS
1455M JONATHAN MANUFACTURING $1.169.92 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
1455M GEORGEAJONES $389.28 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145536 KING BEARING,INC. 81,004.96 MACHINE SUPPLIES
14037 KINSSURSKY BROS.SUPPLY $218.65 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145538 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES 83,431.34 TOOLS
14SS39 KOM NAI MOBILE HOME PARK $1.215.55 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
1455W LA CUINTA MOTOR INN $206.78 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145MI LA TRONICS $323.22 TRAINING EQUIPMENT
145542 LAWICRANDAL,INC. $920.00 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.741 94
145543 FOXLAWSONSASSOC. $3.518.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES-MPRP
145SPI LEARNING TREE INTERNATIONAL $1,995.00 MANAGEMENTTRAININGREGISTRATION
145545 LEE S NO CONSULTING ENGR. $6.416.13 ENGINEERING SERVICES P140-1
145546 LA LIQUID HANDLING SYSTEMS $3,513.75 PUMP PARTS
145547 MPS $441.08 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
145US R.F.MACDONAL13 CO. $30000 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS
145549 MACOMCO $577.20 SERVICE AGREEMENT
1455W MACTEMPS 5540.00 TEMPORARY PERSONNEL
145551 MAD SYSTEMS $342.16 INSTRUMENTPARTS
145552 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS,INC. $1,502.04 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
14550 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $1,898.00 CONSTRUCTION P242-2
FUND NO 910 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE MIME PAGE4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 0512SM5 POSTING DATE 0612MS
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
145564 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $210.85 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
14MSS MCKENNA ENOR.&EQUIP. $1.007.50 PUMP PARTS
14056 MEASUREMENTVARIABLES $289.02 ELECTRIC PARTS
145551 MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. 5172.34 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
145558 MICROBIAL INSIGHTS,INC. $SD0.00 CONSULTING SERVICES M.0.11-I8-92
145559 MIDWAY MFG.&MACHINING $4.180.37 PUMP PARTS
4455W MILLETT INDUSTRIES $88.20 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145561 MISSION ABRASNE SUPPLIES $135.37 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
145562 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3,796.25 UNIFORM RENTALS
145583 MIADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION $343,940.54 CONSTRUCTION 1414A
145584 MOODYS INVESTORS SERVICE $10,000.00 RATING SERVICE MAINTENANCE FEES
145565 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $70.35 SAFETY FILM RENTALS
145566 NEALSUPPLYCO. $199.60 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
145567 NEUTRON $3.507.07 ANIONIC POLYMERM.O.S-10-94
14508 NORTEL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS $8.262.00 TELEPHONE SERVICE AGREEMENT
145569 NOVA POWER,INC. 58,304.00 MECHANICAL TESTING
145570 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $452.39 SAFETY GLASSES
145571 THE OHMART CORP. $8.074.46 TRAINING REGISTRATION-GAUGE SAFETY7TECH.TRAINING
145572 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. $29.91 TRUCK PARTS
145673 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $1,85528 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
145574 ORANGE COURIER $257.30 COURIER SERVICES
14075 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. $1.074.43 FITTINGS
14078 OXYGEN SERVICE $2,177.05 SPECIALTY GASES
145577 P&D ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES $3,458.51 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY
14078 PSSI 5MAS SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION
145579 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $4,050.98 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
1455N PACIFIC PARTS $5,671.27 INSTRUMENT PARTS
145581 PACIFIC BELL $1,179.95 TELEPHONE SERVICES
145582 PACIFIC WATER CONDITIONING CO. $299.00 EQUIPMENTRENTALS
145583 PAGENET $967.49 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
1455" PALMIERI,TYLER,WIENER, $40A0 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.&12-91
145MS PARTS UNLIMITED $306.30 TRUCK PARTS
145588 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $5,700.0 REIMB.PETTY CASH,TRAINING&TRAVEL
145587 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $127,454.23 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.5&91
145586 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS $982.74 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
145589 POHLSON,MOORHEAD&GOETHALS 51,501.50 CAL-OSHA INVESTIGATION
1455M POLYMETRICS,INC. $1,W2.75 LAB SUPPLIES
145591 POLYPURE,INC. 58,860.51 CATIONIC POLYMER MG.1l 1-92
145592 POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO. $288.99 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
145593 RAROLD PRIMROSE ICE 325B.00 ICE
145594 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY $1,687.04 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145595 RBCTRANSPORTDYNAMICS $625.90 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145596 RD SYSTEMS,INC. $701.01 CARD READER REPAIRS
145597 WIN COMPUTER SERVICES,INC. $5.480.21 TRAINING REGISTRATION-CMMS TRAINING
145598 R&R INSTRUMENTS $302.77 INSTRUMENT PARTS
14559E DR.SHIVAII RAMALWGAM $228.23 LAB SUPPLIES
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING OATS SMM5 PAGE 5
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 06I26AI5 POSTING DATE 0WS195
WARRANT NO, VENDOR AMOUNT
145600 REISH MARINE STUDIES,INC. $720.00 OCEAN MONITORING
145601 REMEDY TEMP $3,924.98 TEMPORARY PERSONNEL SERVICES
145602 MCJUNKIW REPUBLIC SUPPLY $1.379,11 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
145603 ROMAC SUPPLY COMPANY $608]4 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
14MM RYAN-NERCO $211.41 PUMP
14MM SAFETY WEST S570A3 INSTRUMENTPARTS
14MM SANOFI BIO-INDUSTRIES $3,46445 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145607 SAWA FE PACIFIC PIPELINE $230.38 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145M SANWA BANK $14,456.38 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION-14-1-IA
145809 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS IN`L $186,484.22 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.S "
145610 R.CRAIG SCOTT S ASSOC. $3.108.58 LEGAL SERVICES-PERSONNEL ISSUES
14WII SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $59807 SPECIALTY BASES
145612 SEABIRD ELECTRONICS,INC. 3356.OD LAB SUPPLIES
145613 SEA COAST DESIGNS $988.07 OFFICE FURNITURE
145614 SHURELUCK SALES $2,838,12 TOOLSHARDWARE
14MIS SKALAR.INC. 529.79 LAB SUPPLIES
14016 SKYLINE DISPLAYS $31S4 TRAINING MATERIALS
145617 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC 5490.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS
145818 M.LEE SMITH PUBLISHERS 5407.00 SUBSCRIPTION
145619 SMITH PIPE S SUPPLY $289,11 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
145620 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. 545,615.17 POWER
145NI SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $64,240 83 NATURAL GAS
145622 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. VLOU.63 DIESEWNLFADED FUEL
14W23 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER $2,83786 DRINKING WATERICOOLER RENTALS
145624 WESTALLOY,INC. $74.07 WELDING SUPPLIES
14W25 SPECIAL PLASTIC SYSTEMS,INC. $166.24 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
145625 SPEX INDUSTRIES,INC. $192.70 LAB SUPPLIES
145627 SPWECO,INC. $1,94088 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145828 STONECONTAINERCORP. $5,005.30 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
14W29 SUPELCO,INC. $154.85 IA13SUPPUES
1456M SUPERB ONE-HOUR PHOTO $12.21 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
145631 TCH ASSOCIATES $822.20 LAB SUPPLIES
145632 TAC WEST.INC. $1.210.51 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
14503 TEKDRAULICS $9.051.17 PUMP PARTS
145834 TELE-CELL,INC. $201,17 COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES
14MS TEXAS COMMERCE BANK 56,503.12 COP TRUSTEE SERVICES
1456M THOMPSON PUBLISHING GROUP $20T00 PUBLICATION
145537 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $728.85 MECHANICAL PARTS
14508 TONrS LOCKS SAFE SERVICE $199.35 LOCKS S KEYS
145839 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES $2.503.50 TRAVEL SERVICES M.O.B&94
14%K) TRIPLE M PACKING $8,192,27 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145641 TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY,INC. $4,156,88 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.O.5-11-W
145642 TRUCK S AUTO SUPPLY,INC. 5685.89 TRUCK PARTS
145643 TRUESDAILLASS $99.00 LAB SERVICES
145844 JG TUCKER S SON,INC. 5271.84 FILTERS
145545 U.S.C.SPONSORED PROJECTS ACCT. 514,396.09 TECHNICAL SERVICES
FUNDING 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 621195 PAGES
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 0628195 POSTING DATE 0628195
WARRANT NO. VENDOR
145645 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $153.00 LAB SUPPLIES
145647 UNIS0URCE8/0R BUTLER PAPER $9,126.31 OFFICE SUPPLIES
145648 MNR SCIENTIFIC 54,057.33 LAB SUPPLIES
145649 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $5.760.12 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
14W50 VALLEY CREST LANDSCAPE,INC. $2.024.00 LANDSCAPING EQUIPMENT
14MI VALLEY VIEW SHOPPING CENTER $235.11 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
14MU VARIAN ASSOCIATES,INC. 5730.85 LAB SUPPLIES
145853 WEFTEC 195 5860.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION-WEF ANNUAL CONF.
1455M WALKER CUSTOM POWDER COATING $232.16 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145655 GUY L.WARDEN 6 SONS $1,082.02 ENGINE PARTS
145656 WAXIE 9380.94 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
145657 WEBBER AIRCRAFT,INC. $3.191.00 REFUNDUSERFEEOVERPAYMENT
145658 WESTAMERICAN RUBBER CO. $2.518.36 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145659 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $34,716.02 CAUSTIC SODA&HYPOCHLORIDE M.0.9.12-9254-13.94
145660 MST41TE SUPPLY CO. 54.494.58 ELECTRICSUPPLIES
14WGI WESCO $3,509.35 INSTRUMENTSUPPLIES
145662 WILLAMETTE INDUSTRIES,INC. $247.21 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145883 WILLOWICK ROYAL MOBILEHOME $1.281.17 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145660 WITEG $162.43 LAB SUPPLIES
146665 XEROX CORP. $7,504.72 COPIER LEASES
145866 GEORGEYARDLEYCO. $1,020.19 LAB SUPPLIES
145667 RICHARD B.EDGAR 5200.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
51,865,133.OB
L
FUNDING 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINO DATE fiQ1A15 PAGE T
REPORT NUMBER M43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 08/16195 POSTING DATE O(InSM5
SUMMARY AMOUNT
01 OPER FUND SS78.83
01 C0NSTR.FUND $951.00
02 OPER FUND 2,467.88
02 CAP FAC FUND 3,458.51
02 CONSTR.FUND 3,2112.50
03 OPEN FUND 10,979.03
03 CAP FAC FUND 388,000.89
03 CONSTR.FUND 2,775.00
05 OPER FUND 5,166.35
05 CONSTR.FUND 870.50
08 OPER FUND 236.01
08 CAP FAC FUND 606.00
68 CONSTR.FUND 538.50
07 OPER FUND 12,258.26
07 CAP FAC FUND 8.745.72
07 CONSTR.FUND 895.50
011 OPEN FUND 2,402.82
011 CAP FAC FUND 89,335.42
011 CONSTR.FUND 887.00
014 OFER FUND 15.24
014 CAP FAC FUND 359,356.92
0588 CAP FAC FUND 692.93
0887 OPEN FUND 211.12
01814 OPER FUND 786.58
J OPER FUND 615,471.95
CORF 78,756.59
SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND 41,882.03
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL 295,664.00
1,M,133.09
FUND NO SIN - fT DIST WORKINGCAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7,0195 PAGE
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 07IIMS POSTING DATE 07N20%
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
145731 ABS SERVICE CO. $4,6 0.94 MACHINE REPAIRS
145732 AFCEA INTERNATIONAL HDORTS. $280.00 COMPUTER TRAINING REGISTRATION
1457M AG TECH COMPANY $73,345.83 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-81
1457M AGX CORPORATION $1,308.54 GAUGE
1457M AT&T-PROWATTS 92,560.76 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
145M AT&T-MEGACOM SERVICE N67.W LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
145737 AT&T-UNIPLAN SERVICE $36.71 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
145738 ACTION DOOR REPAIR CORP. 3587.84 DOOR REPAIRS
145739 ADVANCED WELDER REPAIR $358.06 WELDER REPAIRS
145740 AIR COLA SUPPLY,INC. 8164.51 AIR CONDITIONER PARTS
146741 ALLOY DIE CASTING &82.58 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145742 ALPHAOMEGA $373.92 LAB REPAIRS
145743 AMERIDATA $441.69 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
145740 AMERICAN SIGMA $2,145.38 SAMPLER PARTS
145745 SLAKE P.ANDERSON $151.24 REIMBURSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE
145746 ANDITER-DISTRIBUTION $205.45 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
145747 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $1.733.33 NOTICES&ADS
146748 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $503.20 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
145749 ARMOR-VAC $1,140.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES
145750 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. $105.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL
145751 ASSOCIATED CONCRETE PRODUCTS &110.98 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
145752 RANDOLPH AUSTIN CO. 883396 LAB SUPPLIES
145753 AWARDS TROPHIES $25.27 PLAQUES
1457M BFI MEDICAL WASTE SYSTEMS $43.90 WASTE DISPOSAL
145755 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $430.27 BATTERIES
1467M BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS.INC. $3,587.90 LAB SUPPLIES
145757 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. 5250.05 TRUCK WASH TICKETS
145768 BISHOP COMPANY $839.17 TOOLS
145759 BLOOMBERG L.P. $4.832.59 FINANCIAL MONITORING M.0.4-14-93
M760 BOOT BARN &123.80 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES
145761 SURKE ENGINEERING CO. 9586.17 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
145702 C.L.TECHNOLOGY $720.00 GAS ANALYSIS SERVICES
M763 CS COMPANY $1,412.24 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
145M CAUFORNIAAUTOMATICGATE $424.06 SERVICEAGREEMENT
145766 CALLAN ASSOCIATES,INC. 325,000.00 INVESTMENT ADVISOR SEARCH M.0.24495
145766 CANUSCORPORATION $1,057.24 FIBER OPTIC CABLE
145767 30HN D.CASE ASSOC. $2,438.22 CONSULTING SERVICES
145768 CENTURY SAFETY INST.&SUPPLY $1,593.60 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
145780 CHEM SEARCH $502.33 PIPING PARTS
145770 COASTRUBBERSTAMP 651.72 OFFICE SUPPLIES
145771 COSTAL VIDEO COMMUNICATION &100.55 SAFETY FILM RENTALS
145772 COMPUSA,INC. $132.11 COMPUTERSOFTWARE
145773 COMPUSERVE $354.14 COMPUTER SERVICES
145774 CONSOLIDATED REPOGRAPHICS W9.13 PRINTING SERVICES
10775 CONSUMER PIPE $1.468.51 PLUMBINGSUPPUES
145776 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC. 5735.48 TOOLS
C
FUNDNO 9199 - M DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7105195 PAGE
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 07112MS POSTING DATE 0711W5
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
145777 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO. 8670.00 CHLORINE M.0.10-11-93
145T78 CONTROL CONCEPTS CORP. $501.83 ELECTRIC PARTS
145779 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS O C 51,360.65 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SERVICES M.O.9.11.03
145790 COUNTERPARTENTERPRISES $539.84 MECHANICAL PARTS
145751 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $898.72 ELECTRIC PARTS
1457V CHARLES P.CROWLEY,GO. $616.60 PUMP PARTS
14570 DOUGLAS J.DAVIS 6 ASSOC.,INC. 83,000.00 SAFETY EVALUATION SERVICES
145764 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIF. 838,154.02 DENTAL INSURANCE PLAN M.O.1-12.94
145785 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $1.329.92 SERVICEAGREEMENT
145708 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY 8940.00 ELEVATORMAINTENANCE
1457U ROBERT F.DRWER ASSOC. 821,682A0 PERSONNEL INSURANCE CONSULTANT
145788 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. 82,022.W PAINT SUPPLIES
145709 ESP NORTH $1.981 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
14579D EASTMAN,INC. 85,547.03 OFFICE SUPPLIES
145791 EOOMM.YSIS,INC, $1,028.50 CONSULTING SERVICES
145792 ELECTRO TEST,INC. 89,990.00 METER
145793 EMERGENCY MGMT NETWORK $001.73 SAFETY SUPPLIES
1457" ENCHANTER,INC. 81,680.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.B-10�92
145795 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $760.50 LAB SERVICES
1457M ERNST9YOUNG $58,874.0D FINANCE S TECH.SERVICES REVIEWS M.O.9.1494
145797 EVENTUSSOFTWARE 81,777.10 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
145798 FLUID TECH.SALES S01736 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
107N FNWVALVECOMPANY 8959.49 VALVES
1458W PET SAND AND GRAVEL.INC. 8168.39 ROAD BASE MATERIALS
145801 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $7,972.50 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-011
1458D2 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $339.10 AIR FREIGHT
145803 FIBERTRON 8098.44 FIBER OPTIC CABLE
1458M FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. 33.51 LABSUPPLIES
145605 FISIONS INSTRUMENTS $41.05 LAB SUPPLIES
1458M FLICKINGER CO. 8W'MI VALVES
14H07 PLO-SYSTEMS INC. $38,246.82 PUMP PARTS
146808 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $38.40 PHOTO SUPPLIES
145809 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $321.23 PAINTSUPPLIES
145510 FRYS ELECTRONICS $472.98 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
146811 GST,INC. $2.680.81 OFFICE SUPPLIES
145812 CITY OF GARDEN GROVE 82,11XIM MANHOLEADJUSTING
146913 GENERAL BINDING CORP. $1,725.14 OFFICE SUPPLIES
145914 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. SBS8.53 ELECTRIC PARTS
145015 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1,049.07 TELEPHONE SERVICES
145816 GIERLICH-MITCHELL,INC. $1,612.93 PUMP PARTS
145817 GOVT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOC. $1,260.00 PUBLICATIONS
145018 WWGRAINGER,INC. $924.79 HARDWARE
145819 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $1.466.95 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
1458M GRASBY S.T.I. $3.357.99 ENGINE PARTS
145821 DAVID R.GRIFFIN 8110,448.45 LEGAL SERVICES-TECHRE PIPE M.O.9.1494
14SIM HATCH 9 KIRK,INC. $757.63 MECHANICAL PARTS
FUNDNO 9I9 - f DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DAIS 7MSMS PAGE
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMSPA1D07H2185 POSTING DATE 07112195
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
145823 PL HAWN CO,INC. $607.62 FILTERS
14024 HELPMATES PERSONNEL SERVICES $819.34 TEMPORARY PERSONNEL SERVICES
145825 HEWLETT PACKARD CO. 3144.39 LAB SUPPLIES
145826 HILT,INC. E1,196.04 TOOLS
145027 HOME DEPOT $437.21 HARDWARE
145828 PIS HUGHES CO,INC. $96.95 HARDWARE
145829 CITYOFHUNTINGTONBIACH $15.792.75 WATER USE
145830 HUNTINGTON SUPPLY $24.24 HARDWARE
145831 HYCLONE LABORATORIES,INC. 5555.08 LAB SUPPLIES
145832 IPCOSAFETY $1,418.44 SAFETY SUPPLIES
14503 IMAGING PLUS,INC. $685.53 OFFICE SUPPLIES
145834 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL S0.842.33 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11.18.02
145835 INDUSTRIAL SAFETY SHOE CO. $3,381.97 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES
145838 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $136.12 CONNECTORS
145837 INT'L HOUSE OF PANCAKES 39 $128.69 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145838 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $1.159.45 BATTERIES
145879 INTERSPIRO $912.42 SAFETY SUPPLIES
145840 IRVINE PHOTO GRAPHICS 527.06 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
145841 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $5.54 WATER USE
146842 JIT COMPUTER SOURCE,INC. S2.U18.BB OFFICE EQUIPMENT
145M JAMISON ENGINEERING $4.551.33 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
145W GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY. $788.27 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
14SUS JOBS AVAILABLE 3220.00 NOTICES&ADS
145846 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $870.21 ELECTRIC PARTS
145847 KIMMERLE BRCS.INC. $765.72 PUMP
14WB KING BEARING,INC. $1,453.03 MACHINE SUPPLIES
145849 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $1.070.30 TOOLS
145850 L A CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $915.80 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES
145851 LATRONICS $014.11 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT
145852 LAIDLAW ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES $15,957.55 WASTE DISPOSAL SERVICES
145853 LEHMAN BROTHERS,INC. $129,306.30 TCCPINTERESTM.O.14-94
145854 LOSANGELESTIMES $170.20 SUBSCRIPTION
14WSS NBC APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL $972.05 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6-10.92
145858 MPS $93.75 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
145857 MACTEMPS $360,00 TEMPORARY PERSONNEL SERVICES
145858 MAD SYSTEMS $647.27 INSIRUMENTSUPPLIES
145859 MAGNETEK $3.318.82 ELECTRIC METER
145860 MANLEY'S BOILER REPAIR CO,INC. $325.00 BOILER CLEANING
145MI MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $500.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
145M MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $167,078.00 CONSTRUCTION MA24
145863 MARIE CALIANDERS PIES"I $135A0 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145864 MARVACDOWELECTRONICS $235.35 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
145865 MCCOY SHEET METAL WORKS,INC. $172.40 FITTINGS
1458E6 MIDWAY MFG.&MACHINING P83.55 PUMP PARTS
145887 MISSION INDUSTRIES 53,24UA0 UNIFORM RENTALS
145888 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO. 5190.00 ELECTRIC PARTS
FUNDNO 910 - IT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7MMS PAGE
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CINMS PAID 07/12/95 POSTING DATE 07/12/95
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
145689 MORELAND S ASSOCIATES $9,977.50 FINANCIAL AUDIT SERVICES M.O.3 95
145870 MOTOROIA,INC. $372.04 INSTRUMENT PARTS
145871 MAT WEST MARKETS $750.00 C.O.P.LIQUIDITY FEES
145572 NATIONAL ENVIRO.INFO,SERV. $181.50 LAB SUPPLIES
145873 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $1,944.08 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
145874 NEUTRON $7.024.40 ANIONIC POLYMER M.O.S-I -N
145875 NEW HORIZONS COMPUTER CENTER $2,000.00 COMPUTER TRAINING REGISTRATION
145876 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $36.90 WATER USE
145877 CUMMINS CAL FACA3NAN $190.74 ELECTRIC PARTS
145676 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $7,139.38 ELECTRIC PARTS
145879 ORANGE COURIER $152.55 COURIER SERVICES
145880 ORANGE VALVE 8 FITTING CO. 51,188.09 FITTINGS
145881 OXYGEN SERVICE $1.555.70 SPECIALTY OASES
145882 PSSI $2.325.15 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION
145883 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY 5840.11 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
145W PACIFIC PARTS $31,465.31 FIBER OPTIC EQUIPMENT
145885 PACIFIC BELL 548.79 TELEPHONE SERVICES
145888 NORTEL COMMUNICATIONS SYST. $1.061 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS
145887 PALLETS B ACCESSORIES CO. $1,544.08 WAREHOUSE SUPPUES
14SUS PARAGON CAJOLE 338.78 CABLE SERVICES
145889 PARKHOUSE TIRE CO. $191.86 TRUCK PARTS
145880 PASCAL B LUDWIG $22,254.00 CONSTRUCTION P1428 MAO
145691 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $12,018.51 REIMB.PETTY CASH,TRAINING B TRAVEL
145892 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $279,074.40 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.54591
145893 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS $23,252.48 CMAS COMPUTER HAROWAREISOFTWARE
1458M POLYPURE,INC. $17.987.19 CATIONIC POLYMER M.OS11A2
145895 POSTMASTER $172.00 POST OFFICE BOX RENTAL
145896 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $98.00 ICE
145897 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE IND. $4,412A0 SOIL TESTING
145898 PULSAFEEDER S482b3 PUMP PARTS
145899 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $103,M ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS
145900 R 8 R INSTRUMENTS 5347.01 INSTRUMENT PARTS
145MI DR.SHIVAJI RAMALINGAM $22823 LAB SUPPLIES
145902 REBIS 311.871AS OFFICE EQUIPMENT
145903 REMEDY TEMP $75,1AD TEMPORARY PERSONNEL SERVICES
1459M MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $74.90 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
145M RMMEASUREMENTANDCONTROL $9,889.80 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
145M SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS $1,22530 ELECTRIC PARTS
145907 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $90,45 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
145M SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. 51,103.38 SPECIALTY GASES
145909 SEA SYSTEMS 31,040.00 CURRENT METER STUDY
145910 SEWER EQUIP CO.OF AMERICA $1.263.37 TOOLS
145911 SNURELUCK SALES $11,987.39 TOOLSHARDWARE
145912 SIGMACHEMICALCO. $130.39 LAB SUPPLIES
145913 THE SMITH GROUP $9,958.20 TECHNICAL SERVICES STUDY
145914 SMITH PIPE B SUPPLY INC. $128.44 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
FUNONO 91M - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7105195 PAGES
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 07/12/95 POSTINGDATE0WIMS
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
145915 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. 553.M7.74 POWER
145916 SO.CALIF.WATER CO. $42.23 WATER USE
145917 SOUTHERNCOUNTIESOILCO. $489,21 DIESELAINLEADED FUEL
145918 SPARKLETTSDRINKINGWATER $13.50 DRINKING WATERICOOLER RENTALS
145919 SPARLING INSTRUMENT CO..INC. $260.00 METER
14592D SUMMITSTEEL $909.97 METAL
145921 SUNSET FORD $116.35 TRUCK PARTS
145922 SUPELCO,INC. $101.19 LAB SUPPLIES
145923 TARGET $200.27 GROUNDSKEEPING SUPPLIES
145924 TEXMATE,INC. $189.14 INSTRUMENT PARTS
145925 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $240.26 MECHANICAL PARTS
145926 EUMBETH KYLE THOMPSON $602.85 LIABILITY CLAIM
145927 TONER SYSTEM INTERNATIONAL $1,620.55 PRINTING SUPPLIES
145928 TONYS LOCK 8 SAFE SERVICE $96.82 LOCKS 8 KEYS
145929 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES $2.121.60 TRAVEL SERVICES M.0.64F94
145930 TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY,INC. 13,973.84 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.O.5-11.94
145931 TRUCK B AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $11480.67 TRUCK PARTS
145932 TRUESDAILLABS $3,245.55 LAB SERVICES
145ST3 JG TUCKER B SON.INC. 1202.15 INSTRUMENTPARTS
1459M TUSTIN DODGE 123.64 TRUCK PARTS
145935 ULTRASCIEN7IFIC $197.00 LAB SUPPLIES
145938 UNDERSEA GRAPHICS,INC. S14.O0O.9O OUTFALLREPAIRS
145937 UNISOURCEIVOR BUTLER PAPER 1450.20 OFFICE SUPPLIES
I45NO UNITED PARCELSERVICE 11,083.60 PARCEL SERVICES
145939 VWR SCIENTIFIC 1104.09 LAB SUPPLIES
145840 VERTEX COMPUTER CABLE PRODUCTS $1,00.19 FIBER OPTIC CABLE
145MI VILLAGE NURSERIES $69.62 LANDSCAPINGSUPPLIES
145942 CARL WARREN B CO. $1.289.70 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR
145943 WAXIE 12,661.96 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
145W WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $30.357.15 CAUSTIC SODA B HYPOCHLORIDE M.0.8-12-9284l}94
145945 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $171.33 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
145M WESCO $840.45 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
145947 WTTEG 1291.76 LAB SUPPLIES
145948 ROURKE,WOODRUFF B SPRNGUN 168.541.04 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.2-M92
145949 XEROX CORP. 5759.64 COPIER LEASES
145950 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $831.21 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
145951 YORBA ORANGE GROWERS ASSOC. $11686.38 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 0711 MIS $1,640,228.19
FUNDNO 91M - JT DIV WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 71OMS PAGES
REPORT NUMBERAP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 07112MS POSTING DATE 0WIMS
SUMMARY AMOUNT
21 CONSTR FUND $89.45
02 OPER FUND 2.878.67
02 CAP FAC FUND 298.54
42 CONSTR FUND 1911,88
03 OPER FUND 31,505.08
03 CAP FAC FUND 137,MA5
03 CONSTR FUND 212,78
05 OPER FUND 4,547.37
N5 CONSTR FUND 83.80
NB CONSTR FUND SI M
N7 OPER FUND 8,170.84
07 CONSTR FUND 73.58
Nil OPER FUND 626.31
Nt 1 CAP FAC FUND 1,909.00
N11 CONSTR FUND 84.28
N13OONSTRFUND 2.55
014 CAP FAC FUND 32.00
014 CONSTR FUND 14.98
N488 OPER FUND 2,383A4
N7&14 OPER FUND 20,543.13
JT OPER FUND 938,231.88
CORF 287.789.41
SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND 71,739.57
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL 134,SS7.38
Si,840,228.19
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
JULY 26, 1995
Agenda Item (10)(a): Consideration of Resolution No. 95- 77 , awarding
contract for the Purchase of Anionic Polyelectrolyte
Chemical Polymer, Specification No. C-035, to
Polypure, Inc., for the price of $1.69 per pound, plus
sales tax, for a one-year period beginning September
1, 1995, with option for four one-year extensions
(estimated annual cost $161,699.20, plus sales tax).
Summary
Anionic polymer is used as a chemical coagulant, along with ferric chloride, in the
advanced primary treatment of wastewater. Advanced primary treatment enhances the
treatment efficiency and controls hydrogen sulfide in the anaerobic digestion of sludge.
Advanced primary treatment is cost-effective means of removing solids and biochemical
oxygen demand (BOD) from the wastewater and,thus, aids in meeting the NPDES ocean
discharge limits. It also reduces digester gas hydrogen sulfide levels.
The current contract for supplying polymer is expiring and bids for a new contract have
been solicited. Six chemical suppliers were pre-qualified by laboratory testing. The
polymer sample provided by the suppliers for trial and pre-qualification must exactly
match the respective polymer proposed by the bidders for use under the purchase
contract specifications. Laboratory testing established each project's performance
characteristics, which were used by staff to determine bid quantities of polymer to be
supplied.
Based on the above requirements, four bids were received. The low bid was
$161,699.20, and the high bid was $344,107,67 for annual usage of anionic polymer.
The estimated total annual cost of anionic polymer for physical/chemical treatment is
approximately 29% lower than the current contract.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends award of contract to Polypure, Inc., the lowest responsible bidder, for
the Purchase of Anionic Polyelectrolyte Chemical Polymer, Specification No. C-035, for
the price of$1.69 per pound, plus sales tax, for a one-year period, with provisions for four
(4) one-year extensions. Based on an annual usage of 95,680 gallons, the estimated
delivered cost is $161,699.20, plus sales tax.
FiW PDIXMGF133 BS
,Vf
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
June 29, 1995 of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
1 fi EW6 AVENUE
MEMORANDUM Po.Bolt a,"
`d N WMN vnuEr,caurcAMA 9272"127
TO: Donald F. McIntyre O1A16923AH
FROM: Katherine Yarosh, Senior Buyer
SUBJECT: PURCHASE OF ANIONIC POLYELECTROLYTE CHEMICAL POLYMER
SPECIFICATION NO. C-035
Sealed bids were opened Tuesday,June 27, 1995,for the purchase and delivery of Anionic Polyelectrolyte
Chemical Polymer for a one-year period beginning September 1, 1995. Tabulation of bids is as follows:
SUPPLIER PRODUCT NO. ESTIMATED COST PER ESTIMATED
OTY.(Las.) ACTIVE LB. ANNUAL COST
POLYPURE INC. CLARIFLOC 485 95,680 $1.69 $161.699.20
NEUTRON PRODUCTS,INC. PHOTOFLOC 141,294 $1.80 $254,31120
1100
DATED ENVIRONMENTAL 195 173.476 $1.60 $312.256.80
ROCHESTER MIDLAND CORP. MIDFLOC 126.9T/ $2.71 $407.142.64
PW1319E
CYTEC INDUSTRIES,INC. NO-BID
SECODYNE,INCORPORATED NO-BID
RAJ SAN JOAQUIN CHEMICALS,INC. NO-BID
STOCKHAUSEN,INC. NO-BID
WESTERN STATES NO-SID
Staff recommends the award be made to Polypure, Inc., the lowest responsible bidder, for a one-year
contract period starting September 1, 1995. The total estimated annual delivered price of $161,699.20,
plus sales tax, is based on furnishing 95,680 pounds of polymer at a unit price of$1.69 per active pound.
ProvissiTio11ns are In the specifications for four consecutive one-year contract extensions.
O
Katherine Yarosh
Senior Buyer
We ha a ourNh the 09ve recommendation:
Ted H fman
Purchasing Manager �q� �7 /
1/IM4.
�...i Gary G. S ed Robes.Oot
Director ofFinance Assistant Director of Operations
a�wroocaeloWlFcrosm
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
JULY 26, 1995
Agenda Item (10)(b): Consideration of motion authorizing
membership in the Southern California
Alliance of Publicly Owned Treatment
Works (SCAP) for the 1995-96 fiscal year.
Summary
The Southern California Alliance of Publicly Owned Treatment Works (SCAP) is an
organization comprised of both cities and special districts engaged in providing
sewerage services in the seven counties that make up Southern California. Its primary
purpose is to prepare information and testimony and to present a unified position to
state, regional and local regulatory authorities in support of factually and scientifically-
based, technically-sound, cost-effective regulatory requirements that balance the
protection of the environment with the economic viability of our communities. The
bottom line is to lobby for pragmatic regulations that make rational technical and/or
economic sense, potentially saving POTWs millions of dollars; and, if necessary, to
initiate legal action towards those ends.
SCAP is similar to an organization in Northern California called Bay Area Dischargers
Association (BADA). Originally, the Southern California POTWs were asked to join with
BADA in a state-wide organization. However, it was determined that there were enough
significant differences in regulatory issues that separate groups would be more
effective; although the two groups coordinate on selected issues when appropriate. The
annual membership fees are $24,000.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of membership in SSCAP for the 1995-96 fiscal year..
J:WWPDCCWs M07-10s.wPD
Y
w JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
` REGULAR MEETING
.r JULY 26,1995
DISTRICT 2
Agenda Item(10)(C) : Consideration of motion approving Change
Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for
Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-R1, authorizing an
addition of$98,030.23 to the contract with Colich Bros., dba Colich & Sons, for four items
of additional or deleted work and 8 calendar day time extension.
Summary
In April 1994, the Directors approved the plans and specifications for Contract
No. 2-9-R1, Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer from Imperial Highway west of
Kraemer Boulevard to the intersection of Yorba Linda Boulevard and Associated Road. This
sewer is used to transport wastewater collected from the collection system of the City of Fullerton
to Treatment Plant No. 1.
The $2.9 million project consists of a new 18-inch ductile iron pipe (DIP), 18-inch vitrified day pipe
(VCP) 21-inch VCP, 24-inch VCP, 36-inch VCP and 39-inch VCP gravity sewer. The alignment
starts at Yorba Linda Boulevard and Associated Road, continues northerly in Associated Road to
the intersection of Associated Road and Bastanchury Road, turns easterly in Bastanchury Road
to a point west of 1-57 where it enters the Parkside Apartments complex. The sewer will be
installed in an easement heading north, then turning east and connecting to an existing dry sewer
under 1-57. The alignment continues on the east side of 1-57 entering a second easement located
on private property. The alignment continues easterly in Eucalyptus Street and Gilman Park to a
point of connection to the existing subtrunk sewer. Work consists of the construction of laterals,
manholes, service connections, temporary bypass lines and restoration of damaged landscape.
The changes are caused by revising bypass pumping plans and undisclosed interfering utility
conditions.
Change Order No. 1 is a net addition of$98,030.23 to the contract for four items of added work
and 8 calendar days. This project was designed by Post, Buckley, Schuh and Jennigan (formerly
Church Engineering, Inc.) and awarded to Colich Bros., Inc. dba Colich &Sons in June 1994.
The following is a summary of the contract amount:
Original Contract Amount $2,482,762.00
Previously Approved Changes $ 0.00
This Change (Add)(Deduet) $ 98,030.23
Amended Contract Amount $2,580,792.23
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 1 for an addition of$98,030.23 and 8 calendar
day time extension to the contract with Colich Bros., Inc. dba Colich & Sons.
�' JIWPD0CW%G9S07-10C.WP0
v
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
y M ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
July 26, 1995 19SAA EWS AVENUE
aa.BOX ere)
FOUMA1N VALLEY.OALIiONNIA 92728A127
n1o99L2A11
STAFF REPORT
DISTRICT 2
APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR REHABILITATION OF CYPRESS AVENUE SUBTRUNK SEWER,
CONTRACT NO. 2-9-Rl
Summary
In April 1994, the Directors approved the plans and specifications for Contract
No. 2-9-R1, Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer from Imperial Highway
west of Kraemer Boulevard to the intersection of Yorba Linda Boulevard and Associated
Road. This sewer is used to transport wastewater collected from the collection system
of the City of Fullerton to Treatment Plant No. 1.
The $2.9 million project consists of a new 18-inch ductile iron pipe (DIP), 18-inch
vitrified clay pipe (VCP) 21-inch VCP, 24-inch VCP, 36-inch VCP and 39-inch VCP
gravity sewer. The alignment starts at Yorba Linda Boulevard and Associated Road,
continues northerly in Associated Road to the intersection of Associated Road and
Bastanchury Road, turns easterly in Bastanchury Road to a point west of 1-57 where it
enters the Parkside Apartments complex. The sewer will be installed in an easement
heading north, then turning east and connecting to an existing dry sewer under 1-57.
The alignment continues on the east side of 1-57 entering a second easement located
on private property. The alignment continues easterly in Eucalyptus Street and Gilman
Park to a point of connection to the existing subtrunk sewer. Work consists of the
construction of laterals, manholes, service connections, temporary bypass lines and
restoration of damaged landscape. The changes are caused by revising bypass
pumping plans and undisclosed interfering utility conditions.
Change Order No. 1 is a net addition of $98,030.23 to the contract for four items of
added work and 8 calendar days. This project was designed by Post, Buckley, Schuh
and Jennigan (formerly Church Engineering, Inc.) and awarded to Colich Bros., Inc. dba
Colich & Sons in June 1994.
Item 1, in the amount of$75,193.14 and 5 calendar days, represents costs incurred to
revise the bypass pumping procedures that were required to construct a new diversion
structure, manhole and remove two existing manholes. It was discovered the existing
sewer line that was proposed to take the flow from two sewer lines was not adequate
and an alternate line in close proximity would be utilized. This revision created the need
yam, for two additional bypass systems, addition of a 72-inch manhole, additional piping,
P
larger than anticipated excavation, changed shoring undisclosed concrete obstructions,
existing sewer line not located as per drawings, greater thicknesses of asphalt paving
than expected, weekend overtime. Premium work at direction of City and the deletion of
a diversion structure and manhole (full credit received from Contractor).
Item 2, in the amount of $1,530.00, was the substitution of 310 feet of 39-inch DIP for
VCP due to an interference of a storm drain. The thinner wall of the DIP allowed
sufficient clearance for the placement of the sewer line.
Item 3, in the amount of$8,437.96 and 3 calendar days, represents costs encountering
various undisclosed utilities including water lines and a concrete encased sewer line.
Item 4, in the amount of$12,869.13 is the cost of encountering undisclosed abandoned
underground steel shoring which had to be partially removed and encountering a
misplaced telephone cable which was not as shown in the contract drawings.
If the Directors approve this change order, the total cost of the change orders to date on
this contract will be $98,030.23. This represents an increase of 3.95% over the original
contract amount. The changes above would have been included in the original design if
discovered or known in the design phase. No additional costs were incurred over-and-
above what would have been had the conditions been shown in the original contract
drawings.
Staff Recommendation ..
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 1 for an addition of$98,030.23 and 8
calendar day time extension to the contract with Colich Bros., Inc. dba Colich & Sons.
DC:jac
ENGWGRRPTMR07-01.95
9
Page 1 of 5
�...i COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Colich Bros. Inc. dba Colich & Sons C.O. No.: One (1)
Date: July 26, 1995
Job: Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-Rl
Consultant: Post Buckley Schuh and Jenniean (formerly Church Enoineerine Inc.)
Amount of this Change Order (Add)(Deduel) $ 98,030.23
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract
work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor,the following additions to or
deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
ITEM t -REVISION OF BYPASS PUMPING
In the intersection of Associated Road and Yorba Uncle Boulevard,the contract documents specified that
existing 844nch diameter and a 72-inch diameter manholes be removed and an 8'x 14'diversion structure and a
new 84-inch manhole be installed. Also,there was an wasting 24-inch and 184nch sewer line running parallel
down Associated Road that intersected these two manholes. The abandonment of existing and constructing new
facilities required the bypass pumping or diverting flows into the 244nch line. That 24-inch line reduces to a
der/ 18-inch line downstream. By measuring flows in the 244nch line,it was determined that R did not have the
capacity to accept the additional flow from the 18-inch line. Therefore,the initially designed procedure was
abandoned and the flow from the 184nch line was diverted to a second,adjacent 24-inch line that fed into the
Yorba Linda Pump Station. Maintaining these flows required two additional bypass systems,both of greater
difficultly than originally anticipated,the deletion of the 8'x 14'diversion structure with full credit received from
Contractor,the addition of a 72inch manhole and additional piping. The 724rch manhole was placed on a
common base with the Wnch manhole and because the 244nch sewer lines must remain in service throughout
the excavation operations a larger excavation was needed. The larger excavation required additional shoring
requirements. Other costs involved additional concrete in the manhole bases, additional temporary plugs The
24-inch sewer was 4 feet farther than located on plans causing more excavations, and undisclosed reinforced
concrete pipe removed,asphalt paving three times thicker than shown on plans and overtime on weekends as
prescribed by the City of Fullerton. This item of work was performed on a negotiated basis in accordance with
General Provisions Section 10-6(B)2(a).
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $75,193.14
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 5 Calendar Days
ITEM 2-SUBSTITUTION OF SEWER PIPE TYPE
During the"potholing"operation prior to the placing of the 39-inch sewer line on Associated Road,it was noted
that the bottom of two exsting storm drains(30-inch and 48-inch) at Station 7+60 would interfere with the crown
on the new 39-inch vitrified clay pipe (VCP)sewer line. This is considered a changed condition. The Contractor
was directed to substitute the 39-inch VCP with 36-inch ductile iron pipe(DIP) between manholes at Stations
5+32 and 8+42. This allowed the clearance needed to pass under the storm drains. The additional cost is for
the difference in the more expensive ductile iron pipe. This Rem of work was performed on a force account basis
in accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6(B)2(b).
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $1,530.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
0
Page 2 of 5 y
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Colich Bros. Inc. dba Colich 8. Sons C.O. No.: One (1)
Dale: July 26. 1995
Job: Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-Rl
Consultant: Post, Buckley Schuh and Jenninan (formerly Church Enaineerina. Inc.)
ITEM 3-UNDISCLOSED UTILITIES
The Contractor encountered various underground utilities not shown on the contract drawings while excavating
and placing the new 364nch,21-inch,and 184nch sewer. These utilities were not disclosed to the consultant
during the design of the proect except as noted In No. 3.
1. Encountered a 104nch asbestos cement pipe(ACP)at Station 14+42 in Associated Road near
Bastanchury Road. This unknown utility was in direct conflict with the 36-inch VCP.
Cost of this Rem: $1.797.42
2. During the excavating operation for a bore pit at Station 57+99 at Gilman Park,the Contractor
encountered a 1%-inch and 11/.4nch irrigation (water)line,a 24nch water service line and a 4-inch water
line. The bore pit was required in order to"micro-tunnel"under Gilman Park in order to reduce damage
to the park and the various water lines were not known to be present.
Cost of this Rem: $2,494.19
3. Encountered an 8-inch concrete encased sewer line at Station 28+72 on Bastanchury Road at Derek
Drive. The sewer line was known to be present but there was no indication R would be concrete
encased. Additional equipment and time were required to remove the concrete before the sewer line
could be connected into a new manhole.
Cost of this item: $2,425.52
4. During the excavating of a receiving pit for the micro-tunneling operation at Station 62+50 in Gilman
Park,the Contractor encountered a 1-inch and a 21/.4nch irrigation (water) line and a valve box not
shown on the contract drawings.
Cost of this Rem: $1,720.83
This work was performed on a force account basis in accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6(B)2(b).
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER REM: $8,437.96
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 3 Calendar Days
s
4
Page 3 of 5
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Colich Bros. Inc. dba Colich & Sons C.O. No.: One (1)
Date: Jul v 26, 1995
Job: Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-R1
Consultant: Post Buckley Schuh and Jenniaan (formerly Church Enoineerina. Inc.)
CONTRACT NO.2-36
ITEM 4-UNDISCLOSED UNDERGROUND OBSTRUCTION AND MISPLACED UTILITY
The Contractor was required to place a 130-foot reinforced concrete encasement around the existing 39-inch
VCP sewer line at Station 1232+00 at the Green River Golf Course. This line passes under the AT&SF railroad
tracks. The concrete encasement Is for the protection of the sewer line due to the future addition of a parallel
track for the AT&SF commuter line. During the excavation operation,an undisclosed underground obstruction
was struck and found to be an extension of the steel beam and plate shield shoring system left in the ground
from the previous pipe jacking encasement under the existing tracks. This caused considerable delay and hand
digging. Also,a U.S.Sprint utility tine in a 44nch conduit was known to be running parallel to and on the south
side of the railroad track, but was not to cross the area of excavation for the sewer line. The U.S.Sprint line did
in fact cross the excavation causing additional delay in working around and protecting the utility. This hem of
work was performed on a force account basis in accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6(B)2(b).
Staff will attempt to recover these costs from the AT&SF Commuter Rail Development Board and SAWPA.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $12,869.13
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $98,030.23
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 8 Calendar Days
r
Page 4 of 5
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY U
108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Colich Bros. Inc. dba Colich&Sons C.O. No.: One (1)
Date: July 26, 1995
Job: Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-Rl
Consultant: Post. Buckley. Schuh and Jennigan (formerly Church Engineering, Inc.)
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work
and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by
this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 8 days extension of
time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no direct or indirect, incidental or
consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor,
except as expressly granted and approve by this Change Order.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date: June 30, 1994
Original Contract Time: 180 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date: December 27, 1994
Time Extension this C.O.: 6 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension: 8 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time: 188 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date: July 3, 1995
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable
Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable
Original Contract Price $2,482,762.00
Prev. Authorized Changes $ 0.00
This Change (Add) (Pedeet) $ 98,030.23
Amended Contract Price $2,580,792.23
C
Page 5 of 5
`...� COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728.8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Colich Bros. Inc. dba Colich &Sons C.O. No.: One (1)
Date: July 26, 1995
Job: Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer. Contract No. 2-9-R1
Consultant: Post, Buckley Schuh and Jenniaan (formerly Church Enaineerina. Inc.)
Board Authorization Date: July 26, 1995
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Submitted by =ecom %11E
✓��
9s Gl3%s'
ngineering Manager Date Construction Ma a Date
Appr d by: p vad as to Fo m
r' 95
Dir for of Engineering Dale enera Counsel Date
Accepted by:
COLICH BROS., INC. dba Colich & Sons
Contractor ate
v JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
JULY 26, 1995
DISTRICTS 3 & 11
Agenda Item (10)(d): Consideration of motion to receive,file and
deny claim of Colich Bros., Inc. dba Colich &
Sons received June 21, 1995, in the amount of
$300,208.22, plus unspecified additional
expenses, plus legal expenses for a fuel spill in
connection with Slater Avenue Pump Station,
Contract No. 11-17-1, and refer to the Districts'
General Counsel and liability claims
administrator for appropriate action.
Summary
See attached memorandum dated July 17, 1995 from General Counsel.
Recommendation
Staff recommends to receive and file claim from Colich Bros., Inc. dba Colich &Sons, and refer
to Districts' General Counsel and liability claims administrator for appropriate action.
�:�wrooc�sswceser-r ro
ti JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
JULY 26,1995
DISTRICTS 5 & 6
Agenda Item (10)(e): Consideration of motion approving Change Order
No. 1 to the plans and specifications to Replacement
of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3,
Contract No. 5-37-3, authorizing an addition of$60,458.08 to the contract with Wal-Con
Construction Company for two items of additional work and 60 calendar days time extension.
Summary
In September 1994, the Directors approved the plans and specifications for Contract No. 5-37-3,
Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3 and Balboa Boulevard Sewer Main
Replacement from 45th Street to West Coast Highway and Abandonment of 471h Street Pump Station
Project, City of Newport Beach. The sewer is used to transport wastewater collected from the
collection system of the Cities of Costa Mesa and Newport Beach to Treatment Plant No.2.
�.d The $2.4 million project consists, in general, of replacing the old 30-inch sewer with a new 39-inch
vitrified clay pipe (VCP) gravity sewer and appurtenances in Pacific Coast Highway from Bitter Point
Pump Station to the Arches (Newport Boulevard), Contract No. 5-37-3 and modification of connecting
of City of Newport Beach sewers to Bayside Drive trunk sewer for County Sanitation District Nos. 5
and 6 (80% District No. 5; 20% District No. 6). Also, gravity sewers and appurtenances and
abandonment of a pump station in Balboa Boulevard for the City of Newport Beach.
Change Order No. 1 is a net addition of$60,458.08 to the contract for two items of added work and a
time extension of 60 calendar days. This project was designed by Boyle Engineering Corporation.
The construction contract was awarded in October 1994 to Wal-Con Construction Company.
The following is a summary of the contract amount:
Original Contract Amount $1,985,000.00
Previously Approved Changes $ 0.00
This Change (Add)(9eduel) $ 60,458.03
Amended Contract Amount $2,045,458.03
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 1 for two items of additional work for an addition
$60,458.08 and 60 calendar days time extension with Wal-Con Construction Company.
J:UPDOCS&AGWO7-7 0E.W P D
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
July 26, 1995 AI ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
108AA EWE AVENUE
va.BON 8127
STAFF REPORT FOUNTAIN VALLEY.GUFORNIA B27269127
01AIBB -IM"
DISTRICTS 5 AND 6
APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS TO
REPLACEMENT OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY GRAVITY SEWER, PHASE 3, AND
BALBOA BOULEVARD SEWER REPLACEMENT FROM AND
ABANDONMENT OF 47TH STREET PUMP STATION PROJECT,
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, CONTRACT NO. 5-37-3
Summary
In September 1994, the Directors approved the plans and specifications for Contract No. 5-37-3,
Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3 and Balboa Boulevard Sewer Main
Replacement from 45th Street to West Coast Highway and Abandonment of 47th Street Pump Station
Project, City of Newport Beach. The sewer is used to transport wastewater collected from the
collection system of the Cities of Costa Mesa and Newport Beach to Treatment Plant No. 2.
The$2.4 million project consists, in general, of replacing the old 30-inch sewer with a new 39-inch
vitrified day pipe (VCP) gravity sewer and appurtenances in Pacific Coast Highway from Bitter Point
Pump Station to the Arches (Newport Boulevard), Contract No. 5-37-3 and modification of connecting
of City of Newport Beach sewers to Bayside Drive trunk sewer for County Sanitation District Nos. 5
and 6 (80% District No. 5; 20% District No. 6). Also, gravity sewers and appurtenances and
�..d abandonment of a pump station in Balboa Boulevard for the City of Newport Beach.
Change Order No. 1 is a net addition of$60,458.08 to the contract for two items of added work and a
time extension of 60 calendar days. This project was designed by Boyle Engineering Corporation.
The construction contract was awarded in October 1994 to Wal-Con Construction Company.
Item 1, in the amount of$8,470.61, is for the addition of a 36-inch ductile iron pipe (DIP)telescoping
sleeve or closure piece on a force main that should have been included in the contract documents.
The sleeve use was inadequately omitted by the Consultant.
Item 2, in the amount of$51,987.47 and 60 calendar days, is for escalated costs of material and labor
due to the delay of the start of the project at the direction of the Districts. The delay was due to the
fiscal impacts on the Districts due to the bankruptcy of the County of Orange.
The above items would have been included in the original design and contract if discovered or known
at the time of bidding.
The original contract amount for the project was $1,985,000.00. The amount of change orders to date
is $60,458.08 representing a net increase of 3% over the original contract amount.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 1 for two items of additional work for an addition
$60,458.08 and 60 calendar days time extension with Wal-Con Construction Company.
DC:jac
ENGWGRRPTS1SRO7-G4.95
4
Page 1 of 4
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: ➢yal-Con Construction Company C.O. No.: One (1)
Date: July 26, 1995
Job: Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer. Phase 3 and Balboa Boulevard
Sewer Replacement and Abandonment of 47th Street Pump Station Protect. City of
Newport Beach, Contract No. 5-37-3
Consultant: Boyle Engineerino Corporation
Amount of this Change Order(Add)(8eduet) $60,458.08
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract
work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or
deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
ITEM 1 -ADDITION OF TELESCOPING SLEEVE
The Contract Drawings required the installation of a 24-inch ductile iron pipe (DIP) force main
telescoping sleeve or closure piece in the modification of the force main at Station No. 55+70 on
d.✓ Pacific Coast Highway(PCH). However, the drawings did not require a telescoping sleeve for the
modifications to the 36-inch DIP force main at the intersection of PCH and Balboa Boulevard. Staff
determined that a similar design should apply and the Contractor was instructed to provide an
additional telescoping sleeve on a force account basis in accordance with General Provisions Section
10-6(B)(2)(b).
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 8,470.61
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 2 -ADDED ESCALATION COSTS AND TIME EXTENSION DUE TO DELAY IN ISSUANCE OF
NOTICE TO PROCEED
The bids for this project were opened on October 13, 1994, awarded by the Boards of Directors
(Resolution No. 94.132) on November 9, 1994 and the contract made and entered into on February 7,
1995. However, it was determined that this project along with many others should be delayed due to
the state of affairs surrounding the bankruptcy on the County of Orange and its related fiscal impact
on the County Sanitation Districts.
Due to the anticipated delay in issuance of the Notice to proceed, the Contractor was informed that he
would not be held liable for the contract completion date of August 6, 1995. Instead, the Districts
would enter into negotiations for an equitable settlement via a change order for both documented and
reasonable Increases in direct costs and for time extension provisions. These increased direct costs
include the escalation of materials such as pipe, crushed rock, asphalt, concrete and for labor costs
�..✓ due to Southern California District Council of Laborers Local No. 652 effective July 1, 1995. The
increase in labor costs due to The International Union of Operating Engineers Local No. 12 is
unknown at this time. Their contract expires on June 30, 1995 and a new contract has not been
negotiated at this time. Therefore, this increase must be handled in a future change order.
Page 2 of 4
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
108"ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9272"127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Wal-Con Construction Company C.O. No.: One(1)
Date: Julv 26. 1995
Job: Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3. and Balboa Boulevard
Sewer Replacement and Abandonment of 47th Street Pump Station Project. City of
Newport Beach. Contract No. 5-37-3
Consultant: Boyle Engineering Corporation
ITEM 2-CONTINUED
The Notice to Proceed will be dated August 1, 1995. The current contract time allowed for completion
of the contract is 180 calendar days. An extension of time is made part of this change order and the
total time to complete will be 240 calendar days from August 1, 1995. All other conditions of Section
50-8 of the Contract Documents will remain unchanged such as the $500.00 per day, liquidated
damages, for each day of delay to be paid by the Contractor.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 51,987.47
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 60 Calendar Days
TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $60,458.08
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 60 Calendar Days -
.t Page 3 of 4
`i COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
108"ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Wal-Con Construction Company C.O. No.: One (1)
Dale: July 26, 1995
Job: Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3. and Balboa Boulevard
Sewer Replacement and Abandonment of 47th Street Pump Station Project. City of
Newport Beach Contrail No. 5-37-3
Consultant: Boyle Enoineerinti Corporation
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work
and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by
this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 60 days extension
of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no direct or indirect, incidental
or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor,
except as expressly granted and approve by this Change Order.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
V./ Original Contract Date: February 7, 1995
Original Contract Time: 180 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date: 180 Calendar Days
Time Extension this C.O.: 60 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension: 60 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time: 240 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date: October 5, 1995
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable
Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable
Original Contract Price $ 1,985,000.00
Prev. Authorized Changes $ 0.00
This Change (Add) (Beduot) $ 60.458.03
Amended Contract Price $2,045,458.03
Page 4 of 4
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9272"127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor. Wal-Con Construction Company C.O. No.: One (1)
Date: July 26, 1995
Job: Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3, and Balboa Boulevard
Sewer Replacement and Abandonment of 47th Street Pump Station Project. City of
Newport Beach, Contract No. 5-37-3
Consultant: Boyle Engineering Corporation
Board Authorization Date: July 26, 1995
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Submitted by: 7 n ed
X G� 1 71S-1 r
Engineering Manager Date Construction er Date
Ap pved by: r d o Form: /
D' ector of Engineering Date G neral unsel Date
Accepted by:
WAL ANTRUCTION COMPANY
7
Contractor Date
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
REGULAR MEETING
JULY 26, 1995
DISTRICT 7
Agenda Item (1 U)(q: Consideration of the following actions relative to
Master Plan Studies for Lemon Heights,
Orange Park Acres and Cowan Heights unincorporated areas of Orange County.
(1) Consideration of motion to receive and file Master Plan for the Lemon Heights
Sewer System, Contract No. 7-16
(2) Consideration of motion to receive and file Master Plan for Orange Park Acres
Sewer System, Contract No. 7-18.
(3) Consideration of motion to receive and file Master Plan for the Cowan Heights
Sewer System, Contract No. 7-19.
Summary
In January 1988,the Boards of Directors authorized Black 8 Veatch Engineers to conduct a preliminary
study regarding unsewered properties within the unincorporated areas of Orange Park Acres,Lemon
Heights and Cowan Heights. These areas are not wflhin any District,but fall under the sphere of influence
of County Sanitation District No.7. In April 1990,District 7 approved the Final Report and
Recommendations Re Unsewered Properties In and Adjacent to County Sanitation District No. 7Issued by
the District No.7 Ad Hoc Committee. The report concluded that groundwater contamination problems most,
caused,in part,by leachate from septic tanks,but an extensive public opinion survey concluded that most
property owners were not willing to pay the costs of annexation and sewer construction. The Ad Hoc
Committee then recommended abandonment of the project.
The completion of the Irvine Ranch Water Districts Harvard Avenue Trunk Sewer(HATS),and ongoing
District 7 plans to abandon local pump stations by connecting to the HATS system,renewed the Directors
interest in completing the planning phase of the local Lemon Heights area sewerage system. In May 1991,
the Ad Hoc Committee recommended,and the Board approved,both preliminary and final design for the
Lemon Heights Sewer System,Contract No.7-16. The Ad Hoc Committee also recommended that a
master plan be prepared for both Cowan Heights and Orange Park Acres. In April 1992,the Board awarded
a Professional Services Agreement to Boyle Engineering Corporation for the preparation of plans and
specifications for Replacement of a Portion of Orange Park Acres Sewer,Contract No.7-17,and Master
Plan for Orange Park Acres Sewer System,Contract No.7-18,and the Master Plan for Cowan Heights
Sewer System,Contract No.7-19. The Orange Park Acres and Cowan Heights Master Plans are complete.
The construction of the sewering systems would be constructed by individual developers in a piece meal
fashion or by forming an Assessment District. CEQA documents would be processed following formation of
an Assessment District. The Replacement of a Portion of Orange Park Acres Sewer,Contract No.7-17 is
80%complete and currently on hold.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Master Plans for Lemon Heights Sewer System,Orange Park Acres Sewer
System and Cowan Heights Sewer System be received and filed.
Vr�
J:tW PDDCeS W G9507-1 GF.W PD
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
101W EWS AVENUE
Y.O.BON 8121
G WAIN VAMY.CALIFORNIA 9272MI 27
July 18, 1995 M41B82P411
STAFF REPORT
Agenda Item (10)(f): Consideration of the following actions relative to Master Plan Studies
for Orange Park Acres and Cowan Heights Unincorporated Areas of
Orange County:
(1) Consideration of Motion to receive and file Master Plan for the Lemon Heights Sewer
System, Contract No. 746.
(1) Consideration of Motion to receive and file Master Plan for Orange Park Acres Sewer
Systems, Contract No.7-18.
(2) Consideration of Motion to receive and file Master Plan for the Cowan Heights Sewer
System,Contract No.7-19.
Summary
In 1979, County Sanitation District No. 7 (CSD7) purchased certain sewers from the City of Orange.
The purchase included the Santiago Canyon Road Sewer from Linda Vista Street to Orange Park
Acres Boulevard at Clark Street, and the Orange Park Acres Sewer from south of Meads Avenue to
Chapman Avenue.
�..� Between Orange Park Acres Boulevard (at Clark Street) and a point south of Meads Avenue
adjacent to Handy Creek, the sewer uses a City of Orange sewer. The city-owned portion was
constructed with 12-inch diameter pipe, connecting a CSD7 upstream 18-inch diameter pipe to a
downstream CSD7 21-inch diameter pipe. For years,this hydraulic deficiency has been planned for
correction, most recently in the Districts' 1989 Master Plan. The replacement would consist of
approximately 3,000 feet of 18-and 21-inch diameter sewer. The alignment will parallel the city
sewer in Meads Avenue, Randall and Clark Streets. New upstream development, particularly in the
areas southwest of the intersection of Santiago Canyon Road and Chapman Avenue, makes this
replacement required.
A special CSD7 Ad Hoc Committee study of local sewers for the Lemon Heights, Cowan Heights
and Orange Park Acres areas have reviewed master planning for Lemon Heights. The noted areas
are not in any of the Districts, but fall under the sphere of influence of CSD7. In January 1988,the
Directors authorized Black&Veatch Engineers to conduct a preliminary study regarding unsewered
properties within the unincorporated areas of Orange Park Acres, Lemon Heights and Cowan
Heights and individual parcels within the City of Tustin. A preliminary design report was issued in
January 19B9 with potential solutions and costs tabulated to sewer the areas. After considerable
study, in April 1990, CS07 approved the Final Report and Recommendations re Unsewered
Properties in and Adjacent to County Sanitation District No. 7 used by the CSD7 Ad Hoc
Committee. While the report concluded that groundwater contamination problems exist in the study
areas, caused in part by leachale from on-site sewage disposal systems(septic tanks, etc.). An
extensive public opinion survey concluded that most property owners were not willing to pay the
cost of annexation, connection and sewer construction, even if substantially underwritten by the
District. Thus,the Ad Hoc Committee recommended, and the Board approved, abandonment of the
proposed project until the residents express an interest in developing a sewage system.
�.d
The completion of the Irvine Ranch Water District's Harvard Avenue Trunk Sewer(HATS),and •.
ongoing CSD7 plans to abandon local pump stations by connection sewers previously served by
the pump station to HATS, renewed interest by the Directors in completing at least the planning and
preliminary design for a local sewerage system in the Lemon Heights area of unincorporated
Orange County. The gravity sewer laterals,which will allow abandonment of the pump station will,
in addition, provide a future outlet for the currently unsewered properties. Additions to these laterals
may allow other portions of the Lemon Heights area to be sewered in the future, provided that the
property owners wish to pay for these extensions. In May 1991,the Ad Hoc Committee
recommended and the Board approved both the preliminary and final sewer design for the Lemon
Heights Sewer System,Contract No. 7-16, including compliance requirements from the California
Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)as part of the work.
The Ad Hoc Committee also recommended that a master plan be prepared for both the Cowan
Heights and Orange Park Acres. (This work could best be combined with the design of the Orange
Park Acres Sewer since aerial topography with have to be flown for both projects).
In April 1992,the Board awarded a Professional Services Agreement to Boyle Engineering
Corporation to prepare the plans and specifications for the Replacement of a Portion of Orange
Park Acres Sewer, Contract No. 7.17, and the preliminary engineering plans for the Preparation of
Master Plan of Sewers for Orange Park Acres(Contract No. 7-18) and Cowan Heights(Contract
No.7-19). The Lemon Heights,Orange Park Acres and Cowan Heights Sewer System Master
Plans are complete. However, the Master Plans are in reality detailed studies that show how and
where the local sewers would have to be built to make the systems work. Each of these systems
requires most of the easements across private property and most likely the formation of an
assessment district or other vehicle to fund the construction of the proposed local sewers. Because
of the way CSD7 is organized and the way previous local sewers were funded through assessment
districts,the proposed facilities to be build could not be funded through the normal CSD7 Capital
Facilities Fund.
The next step would be to form assessment districts and process CEQA documents. However,to
do this, an election would have to be conducted and most of those households residing within any
proposed assessment district would have to vote in favor of the proposal. Staff has had at least two
public meetings within the last three years. The result was less than enthusiastic. Except a few
key individuals,who had to correct severe problems with their septic tanks or lacked the ability to
gel a permit from the county to build a septic tank and subsequent houses on the property. The
assessment district would have to pay for all of the costs to process CEQA documents to purchase
easements, if necessary, complete the detailed design of the individual local sewers, and complete
the final construction. Bonds could be sold to help raise the money, but the ultimate responsibility
to pay for all the above-mentioned costs resides with the homeowner as an assessment to his
property. Very few are willing to commit to these assessments. Staff recommends that CSD7 not
proceed with the work until the interested citizens take the lead. As suggested in the public
meetings, the interested citizens should pass out petitions and concur with many of residents
sufficient to initiate a formal election of the formation of assessment districts.
The Replacement of a Portion of Orange Park Acres Sewers, Contract No. 7-17 is a different type
of contract. It is a trunk sewer instead of a local sewer and is a replacement for an undersized
existing sewer. The design is 80% complete and currently on hold bemuse of bankruptcy related
decisions. Funding is available.
Staff Recommendation
The following three items are requested by Staff for action:
(1) Receive and file Master Plan for Lemon Heights Sewer System. Contract No.7-16.
(2) Receive and file Master Plan for Orange Park Acres Sewer System, Contract No. 7-18.
(3) Receive and file Master Plan for Cowan Heights Sewer System, Contract No. 7-19.
wndoaM(✓r %Nb0608%.er
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
MEETING
AGENDA FOR
JULY 26, 1995
Agenda Item (12)(a): Minutes of the Executive Committee
Summary
(1) Receive and file draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on
June 21, 1995.
(2) Receive and file draft Operations, Maintenance, and Technical Services
Committee Minutes for the meeting held on July 5, 1995.
(3) Receive and file Ad Hoc Committee Minutes for the meeting held July 6, 1995.
(4) Receive and file draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for
the meeting held on July 6, 1995.
(5) Receive and file draft Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee
Minutes for the meeting held on July 12, 1995.
(6) Receive and file draft Executive Committee Minutes for the meeting held on
July 19, 1995.
Summary
See attached minutes.
Executive Committee Recommendation to the Joint Boards of Directors
Receive and file minutes listed above.
4.d
nwwoaasvaesn�nv,
II County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County,California
P.O.Box 8127• 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127
Telephone: (714) 962-2411
�I DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE
June 28, 1995 - 5:30 P.M.
A meeting of the Steering Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held Wednesday, June 28, 1995,
at 5:30 p.m., at the Districts' Administrative office.
(1) ROLL CALL
The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
STEERING COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT:
Present: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel
Bob Zemmel, Director
John C. Cox, Jr., Joint Chair
Peer A. Swan, Vice Joint Chair
John J. Collins, Chair, PDC
Pat McGuigan, Chair, OMTS -
STAFF PRESENT:
Absent: Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager
Gary Streed, Director of Finance
George Brown, Chair, FAHR Jean Tappan, Secretary
Roger Stanton, Vice Chair, FAHR
(2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary-
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no comments by any member of the public.
(4) APPROVAL OF MINUTES
V
The minutes of the May 24, 1995 Steering Committee meeting were approved as
drafted.
Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting
Page 2
June 28, 1995
(5) REPORTS OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR, GENERAL MANAGER AND GENERAL
COUNSEL
No reports were made.
(6) STEERING COMMITTEE DISCUSSION ITEMS
(a) Recruitments.
Assistant General Manager—Administration: The six first round finalists will be
interviewed July 6 and 7. The candidate pool appears to be very strong. The General
Manager indicated that he would like to see the position filled by a "generalist" rather
than a specialist.
Technical Services Director: Nancy Wheatley, currently with Massachusetts Water
Resources Authority, has accepted the Districts offer and will start August 7.
Laboratory Manager: Interviews will be held for the three finalists the week of July 10\—)
The new Technical Services Director will be on the interview panel.
Engineering Director: Sixty-six applications were received and interviews are
scheduled to begin in two to three weeks.
(b) Budget.
The cost per million gallons was the main discussion item. It is estimated to be $599
and is considered the Districts' basic benchmark. The General Manager will be
meeting with all employees in the next month to discuss ways to reduce that number.
(c) Consolidation.
A discussion ensued on the effects of the County bankruptcy on the consolidation of
the Districts.
The Committee directed staff to continue with the consolidation studies and address
how to proceed with the problems with the County as they arise. A white paper is to be
prepared to address our reserves and debt and how they are allocated. Most of the
information is found in the new budget. General Counsel will continue with research
how best to address the debt program under consolidation.
s
Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting
Page 3
June 28, 1995
The Committee directed staff to prepare a model organization structure for the July 19,
1995 Executive Committee: One district, how many directors, one financing entity, and
fee issues.
Additional consideration should be given to areas currently outside the Consolidated
Districts' sphere of influence should the Districts take over the landfills. Agreements
with other entities (SAWPA and IRWD) must also be considered. The General
Manager reported that SAWPA has requested a seat on the Board. While this is a
separate subject from the consolidation, it should also be considered.
(d) Organizational Issues.
The Directors were alerted that an employee may be addressing the Directors on his
opposition to the reorganization of the Technical Services Department.
(e) County of Orange Bankruptcy.
The General Manager thought that many of our existing and future assets are now at
risk and we should be developing contingencies. Staff will continue to keep the
Directors advised.
(f) State's Constitution Revision Commission.
There was a discussion on the Commission's efforts and how they may affect the
Districts. General Counsel indicated that unfortunately Proposition 13 included a lot of
delegated authority to the stale and this could be exercised. This will be monitored and
the Directors will be kept advised.
(g) Revisions to Ordinance re Permits and Fees
The General Manager discussed the issue and some of the background. Cities are
now charging the Districts for encroachment permits and fees which heretofore had
been free. Engineering staff have asked that the policy be reconsidered and that the
Districts in turn charge the cities for inspection fees.
Staff was directed to report to the PDC Committee on which cities are charging the
Districts, and also to prepare a draft staff report on the change in policy.
Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting
Page 4
June 28, 1995
(7) CLOSED SESSION
There was no closed session.
(8) OTHER BUSINESS
The Joint Chair and the General Manager will conduct the performance review for the
Board Secretary.
The Joint Chair announced that the RFP for AB 2766 funds will be out shortly. The
submittal deadline is September 15. He encouraged the Districts to respond.
(9) MATTERS TO BE REPORTED AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING
There were no matters to be reported.
(10) MATTERS ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT
There were no matters for a future agenda.
(11) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS
The next meeting will be at the call of the Joint Chair.
(12) ADJOURNMENT
The Steering Committee adjourned at approximately 6:43 p.m.
Submitted by:
Jean Tappan, Steering Committee Secretary
County Sanitation Districts
II of Orange County,Ellis
Avenue
P.O. Box in V • y,CA Ellis Avenue
� Fountain Valley,CA 92728-9127
Telephone:(714)962-2411
DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND
TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE
WEDNESDAY, JULY b. 1995-5:30 PM
A meeting of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee of the
County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California
was held on July 5, 1995, at 5:30 P.M. at the Districts' Administrative offices.
(1) ROLL CALL
The roll was Called and a quorum declared present as follows:
Committee Directors Present: Staff Present:
Pal McGuigan, Chair Blake Anderson,Assistant General Manager
John C. Cox,Jr.,Joint Chair Mark Esquer, Operations Engineer
Barry Denes Gary Hasenstab, Director of Human Resources
�„✓ Norman Z. Eckenrode Ed Hodges, Director of Maintenance
James M. Ferryman Terri Josway, Manager of Safety and Health
Mark A. Murphy Don McIntyre, General Manager
Peer Swan Mike Moore,Technical Services Division
Bob Dolan, Director of Operations
Ed Torres, Director of Technical Services
Committee Directors Absent: Others Present:
Victor Leipzig,Vice Chair
Julie Sa
Sal Sapien
(2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIRMAN PRO TEM. IF NECESSARY
No appointment was necessary.
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no Comments from the public.
a
Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance
and Technical Services Committee Meeting
Page 2 of 4
July 5, 1995 ..
(4) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR. GENERAL MANAGER, ASSISTANT
GENERAL MANAGER OF OPERATIONS, DIRECTOR OF MAINTENANCE
AND GENERAL COUNSEL
(a) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
The Committee's tour of Plant No. 2 is to be held August 2, 1995. The
Committee is to meet at the regular place and time for dinner and the tour
will follow.
(b) REPORT OF GENERAL MANAGER
Don McIntyre reported on the following:
1. Don McIntyre and Blake Anderson will be attending a meeting
July 7 on the Service Delivery System. It is believed that the
meeting will be to look at Supervisor Bergeson's idea of a new
charter for the County. They will report back to the OMTS
Committee, if necessary.
2. There are six candidates for the position of Assistant General
Manager of Administration. Interviews are to be held on July 6
and 7.
(c) REPORT OF ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER OF OPERATIONS
Blake Anderson reported on the following:
1. There are 66 applications in for the position of Director of
Engineering.
2. The interviews for the Laboratory Manager will be done the week of
July 10. Nancy Wheatley, the new Director of Technical Services,
will be in town and will be on the interviewing panel.
3. Excellent news. The District Attorney's office has formally notified
the Districts that their investigation of the February 1, 1994 accident
at Plant No. 2 is complete and they found the Districts were not at
fault. OSHA previously cited the Districts on points staff
strenuously contends; the attorneys are working on the matter.
This leaves the Civil case, filed by the survivors, as the only
outstanding portion of this matter.
(d) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF MAINTENANCE
Ed Hodges reported on the following:
1. We have received some positive responses and questions from
City Managers who received our Spill Containment Policy.
Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance
and Technical Services Committee Meeting
Page 3 of 4
.. July 5, 1995
2. AB2766 (the Sher Bill) provides $25 million, available as part of the
DMV vehicle registration. This money is available for the
conversion of Heavy Duly vehicles to compressed natural gas
(CNG) and electric vehicles in the South Coast Air Basin. The
South Coast AQMD is soliciting proposals from interested parties.
Proposals are due September 17. Ed Hodges will report on the
status of the Districts' proposal at the September 6 OMTS
Committee meeting
(e) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES
Ed Tones reported on the contents of the House side of the Clean Water Act
and what impact it would have on the Districts. He also reported on AMSA's
strategy for dealing with the Senate version Reauthorization (HR961) and how
it relates to existing legislative requirements. It was noted that this is not
viewed as a high priority and will probably not be on this year's Senate
calendar.
If) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
No report was given.
(5) APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF JUNE 7. 1995
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting
held on June 7, 1995, it was moved, seconded and carried that said minutes be
deemed approved as mailed.
(6) OLD BUSINESS
OMTS95-020: Quarterly Status Report on the Implementation of the 38
Recommendations made as part of the Ernst and Young Audit
of the Operations and Maintenance Departments - Information
Item
Ed Hodges gave a brief status report.
OMTS95-021: Quarterly Report on the Districts' Occupational Injury and Near
Miss Accident Rates- Information Item
Terri Josway gave a presentation and answered the questions of the
Committee members.
(7) NEW BUSINESS
OMTS95-036: Consideration of Motion Authorizing the General Manager to
Enter Into Engineering Feasibility Studies with the Southern
California Edison (SCE)"ENVEST" Program to study energy
conservation measures at the Districts'treatment plants for an
amount not to exceed $30,000 -Action Item
Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance
and Technical Services Committee Meeting
Page 4 of 4
July 5, 1995
Bob Ooten gave a short presentation and a discussion followed. It was then
moved, seconded and carried to approve staffs recommendation with the
stipulation that before additional money is spent, the item must come back
before the OMTS Committee for approval.
OMTS95-037: Consideration of Motion to receive and file a report on the
Status of Hiring a Security(Guard)Company to provide
security and guard services for the Districts -Information Item
Item was received as an information item and not discussed.
OMTS95-038: Consideration of Motion Authorizing the General Manager to
approve Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services
Agreement with Ernst&Young to include services for
development of documentation and provide training for
conducting process Improvement analysis of key programs
within the Technical services Department for an amount not to
exceed $20,000 -Action Item
Ed Torres answered the questions of the Committee members. It was then
moved, seconded and carried to approve staffs recommendation.
(8) CLOSED SESSION
The Chair declared there were no items for closed session.
(9) OTHER BUSINESS, IF ANY
Ed Torres is to prepare a summary of his report on the Clean Water Act
Reauthorization, for Director Sapien and the Chair, Director McGuigan, before the
CASA Congress beginning August 9, 1995.
(10) MATTERS ON WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT AT A
SUBSEQUENT MEETING
None.
(11) MATTERS A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA
FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT
None.
(12) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING DATES AND ITEMS TO BE
DISCUSSED AT THOSE MEETINGS
None.
(13) ADJOURNMENT
The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:50 P.M.
/cm
JAWPDOMMI ECUUL9510MMMIN
County Sanitation Districts
II of Orange County,California
P.O. Box 8127.108"Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127
Telephone: (714)962-2411
DRAFT
MINUTES OF AD HOC COMMITTEE
MEETING
Friday. July 6 1995 at 4:30 p.m.
A meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee of
the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13, and 14 of Orange County,
California was held on Thursday, July 6, 1995, at the Districts' Administrative Office.
(1) ROLL CALL
Those present were as follows:
AD HOC COMMITTEE: STAFF PRESENT:
John Collins, PDC Comm. Chair Don McIntyre, General Manager
John Cox, Joint Chair Blake Anderson, Asst. General Manager
Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Don Griffin, Past Joint Chair John Linder, Director of Engineering
(2) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments received.
(3) APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of the April 28, 1995 Ad Hoc Committee were approved as written.
(4) REPORTS OF COMMITTEE CHAIR GENERAL MANAGER AND DIRECTOR OF
ENGINEERING
There were no reports.
(5) NEW AND MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS
"� There were none.
Minutes of Ad Hoc Committee Meeting
Page 2
July 6, 1995
(6) OLD BUSINESS
(a) The draft Scope of Work for space utilization study was discussed. Several
clarifications were suggested by the Committee including the attachment
prepared by Director Griffin. The Scope will be revised and returned to this
Committee for review prior to sending out with Request for Proposals (RFP)
to selected consultants.
(b) The remaining items on the agenda were not addressed by the Committee
due to the time restraints. The Chairman determined that the Ad Hoc
Committee would meet at 5:00 p.m., Friday, July 14, 1995 to discuss and
take action on the items not addressed at the meeting of July 6, 1995.
(c) The Committee will seek authorization at the Planning, Design and
Construction (PDC) Committee meeting to be delegated the authority to make
the final decisions on actions required to solicit, negotiate, award, and issue
purchase order to various vendors for Modifications to the Existing Interior
Office Spaces in the Administration Building for the General Management,
Administrative, and Communication offices.
(7) OTHER BUSINESS, IF ANY
No other business was discussed.
(8) FUTURE MEETINGS
The next meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee will be held Friday, July 14, 1995
at 5:00 p.m.
(9) ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 5:30 p.m.
Gail Cain
Committee Secretary
JDL:gc
ADHOC95\070695.10IN
County Sanitation Districts
II of Orange County,California
P.O.Box 8127.10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127
Telephone: (714)962-2411
DRAFT
MINUTES OF PLANNING, DESIGN AND
CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE
Thursday, July 6. 1995 at 5:30 p.m.
A regular meeting of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee of the County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13, and 14 of Orange County, California was
held on Thursday, July 6, 1995, at the Districts' Administrative Office.
(1) ROLL CALL
The roll was taken and a quorum declared present, as follows:
PLANNING. DESIGN AND
CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE: STAFF PRESENT:
John Collins, Chair Don McIntyre, General Manager
�.. John Cox, Joint Chair Blake Anderson, Assistant General
Shirley Dettloff Manager
Don Griffin John Linder, Director of Engineering
Barry Hammond Steve Hovey, Director of Information
Margie Rice Services
Sheldon Singer, Vice Chair Bob Ooten, Director of Operations
Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Charles Sylvia Jack Vincent, Planning & Design Manager
Nick Arhontes, Staff Engineer,
Maintenance
Stuart Severn, Systems Engineer
Paul Mitchell, Project Manager
e
Minutes of Planning, Design and
Construction Committee Meeting
Page 2
July 6, 1995
(2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
John Collins advised that if the Chairman is present and the Vice Chair is absent,
there is no need to have a Chairman pro tem. The only time there is a need for a
Chairman pro tem is if the Chairman is absent.
No appointment was necessary.
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments received.
(4) APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF APRIL 6. 1995 MEETING
The minutes of the July 6, Planning, Design and Construction Committee were
approved as written.
(5) REPORTS OF COMMITTEE CHAIR, GENERAL MANAGER, ASSISTANT
GENERAL MANAGER, DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING AND GENERAL
COUNSEL
(a) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
There was no report made by the Committee Chair.
(b) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
The General Manager stated they had conducted interviews with five of the
six candidates for the position of Assistant General Manager. They were
conducting the interview of the sixth candidate tomorrow, and were
expecting to make a decision by the beginning of next week.
REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER
The Assistant General Manager reported on the recruitment for the
Director of Engineering position. Human Resources is in receipt of
approximately 60 applications, ten of which look very good. Interviewing
will begin shortly. Next week, interviews will begin for the Laboratory
Division Manager. Nancy Wheatley, who has been selected as the
Director of Technical Services, will take part in the interviews for the
Laboratory Division Manager.
,
Minutes of Planning, Design and -
Construction Committee Meeting
Page 3
July 6, 1995
The Assistant General Manager provided an update on the accident at
Plant 2 on the Pascal and Ludwig job. CalOSHA is still conducting their
investigation and the District Attorney has determined that there was no
criminality on the part of the Districts.
(c) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING
There was no report made by the Director of Engineering.
(d) REPORT OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL
There was no report made by the General Counsel.
(6) STAFF OVERVIEW OF DISTRICTS' PLANNING, DESIGN AND
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES
(a) Status Report on Ernst &Young's Capital Project Management
Improvements Process (Nick Arhontes)
Nick Arhontes gave a brief update on Ernst &Young's Capital Project
Management Improvements. A revised "Action Plans Schedule" was
provided to all in attendance.
There are approximately 50 people involved in the 14 Task Groups. Nick
will report on the Capital Project Management Improvements again in three
months.
(7) OLD BUSINESS
None to report.
(8) ACTIONS RE PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTS
(a) Quarterly Change Order Report by Director of Engineering
The Director of Engineering discussed the Quarterly Change Order Report.
It was moved, seconded, and passed to receive and file the Monthly
Change Order Report.
1 of
e
Minutes of Planning, Design and
Construction Committee Meeting
Page 4
July 6, 1995
(b) Action Items
PDC95-23: Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2
to the plans and specifications for Miscellaneous
Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P7-42, and
Miscellaneous Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No.
P2-49 for a credit of$18,941.00 to the contact with Pascal
& Ludwig Engineers for two items of additional work and
three items of deleted work.
Committee questioned why this item was on this report. The
Director of Engineering reported that this item is a credit of
$18,941.00, however, the additions are above what the
General Manager can approve. It involves miscellaneous
work done at both Plant 1 and Plant 2. Motion made,
seconded, and passed.
(9) ADDENDA TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS
(a) Director of Engineering reported on the Addenda to the Professional
Services Agreement. In the last quarter, there were only two addenda to
Professional Services Agreements.
(10) NEW PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS
None to report.
(11) CONSIDERATION OF NEW AND MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS
PDC95-24: Discussion of Plant Automation Computer System and
Consideration of Motion Authorizing Staff to Issue Purchase
Order with Pioneer-Standard Electronics for Two VAX 4000,
Model 705A Computers for Plant 2 Plant Automation.
Steve Hovey and Stuart Severn presented the Committee with a
proposal for the computer hardware upgrade of two existing VAX
4000, Model 300 Computers to VAX 4000, Model 705A Computers
for Plant 2 automation and the purchase of 32 DEC Pentium
Personal Computers for Operations at both Plant 1 and Plant 2.
There was lengthy discussion about the cost and critical timing due
to weather and how the "old" equipment utilization had changed
since the initial issue was brought to the Committee a year ago. The
Committee felt that the cost for the new equipment was highly
inflated.
Minutes of Planning, Design and
Construction Committee Meeting
Page 5
July 6, 1995
The Committee authorized staff to proceed with the part of the
proposal to purchase the two VAX 4000 Computers for Plant 2
automation, and address the purchase of the 32 Pentium Personal
Computers at the September meeting after more competitive quotes
are received. Motion was made, seconded, and passed to purchase
the two computers for the Ocean Outfall Booster Station (OOBS).
PDC95-25: Consideration of Motion to Approve the Ad Hoc Committee
Recommendations re Space Utilization Study for Actions
Required to Solicit, Negotiate, Award and Issue Purchase
Orders to Various Vendors for Modifications to the Existing
Interior Office Spaces in the Administration Building for
General Management, Administration, and Communication
Offices, Specification No. E-256, in an Amount Not to Exceed
$165,250.00.
A meeting with the Ad Hoc Committee was held prior to the PDC
meeting and time ran out discussing the items relating to the Space
Utilization Study. A meeting is scheduled for next Friday, July 14,
1995, at 5:00 p.m. to continue discussion. It was proposed that the
Committee delegate the authority to the Ad Hoc Committee to make
a decision on this item. The item deals with modifying the existing
interior office spaces in the Administration Building for General
Management, Administration, and Communication offices. Motion
was made, seconded, and passed to delegate authority to the Ad
Hoc Committee to make said decisions.
(12) CLOSED SESSION
The Chair determined that there was no need for a Closed Session.
(13) OTHER BUSINESS, IF ANY
No other business was discussed.
(14) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A
SUBSEQUENT MEETING
There were no matters discussed.
Minutes of Planning, Design and
Construction Committee Meeting
Page 6
July 6, 1995
(16) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE
AGENDA FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT
There were no matters discussed.
(16) NEXT MEETING
(a) Executive Committee Meeting -Wednesday, July 19, 1995 at 5:30 p.m.
(b) Joint Boards of Directors Meeting -Wednesday, July 26, 1995 at 7:30 p.m.
(c) Ad Hoc Committee Meeting - Friday, July 14, 1995 at 5:00 p.m.
(d) Planning, Design and Construction Committee Meeting -Thursday, September 7,
1995 at 5:30 p.m. at Plant 2 Operations Center
(17) OTHER ANNOUNCEMENTS, IF ANY
There will be a tour of Plant 2 on Wednesday. August 2, 1995, at 5:30 p.m. Meet
at Plant 1 Administration to take bus to Plant 2. If you plan on attending, please
contact Jean Tappan in the General Manager's office.
(18) ADJOURNMENT
The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:15 p.m.
/Gail A. Cain
Planning, Design and Construction
Committee Secretary
wpd=\n& 5mpX070N5.min
1 II County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County,California
P.O. Box 8127.10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley,CA 9272841127
Telephone: (714)9624411
DRAFT
MINUTES OF FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE
Wednesday, July 12, 1995, 5:30 P.M.
A meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee of the
County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County,
California was held on July 12, 1995 at 5:30 p.m., at the Districts' Administrative Offices.
(1) ROLL CALL
The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
Committee Directors Present: Staff Present:
John C. Cox, Jr., Joint Chairman Don McIntyre, General Manager
George Brown, Chairman Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager
Burnie Dunlap Gary Slreed, Director of Finance
James Flora Ed Hodges, Director of Maintenance
John M. Gullixson Bob Ooten, Director of Operations
Wally Linn Mike White, Controller
b.✓ Thomas Saltarelli Steve Kozak, Financial Manager
Roger R. Stanton, Vice Chairman
William G. Steiner Others Present
Peer Swan
Tom Woodruff, General Counsel
Committee Directors Absent: Rich Brown, Orange County Employees Assn.
Jan Debay
(2) APPOINTMENT OF A CHAIRMAN PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
No comments were made.
(4) REPORTS OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR, GENERAL MANAGER ASSISTANT
GENERAL MANAGERS) DIRECTOR OF FINANCE/TREASURER
DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES AND GENERAL COUNSEL
(a) Report of the Committee Chair
George Brown, Chairman, had no report.
Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee '
Page 2
July 12, 1995
(b) Report of the General Manager ..d
General Manager Don McIntyre reported on the status of pending
recruitments for Laboratory Manager, Director of Engineering and
Assistant General Manager for Administration. He requested that the
proposed salary level of the Assistant General Manager be added to the
agenda in order to have a Committee recommendation to the Boards.
The Committee voted to add an emergency agenda item.
(c) Report of Assistant General Manager
Assistant General Manager Blake Anderson updated the Committee on
recent events regarding the County bankruptcy, including the OCIP Pool
Committee meeting of earlier in the day. He reported on the interest
allocation expected next week, the litigation strategy against Merrill Lynch
at. al, the hearing before Judge Ryan scheduled for July 14, 1995, the
reasons the OCIP Pool Committee opposed the "roll-over" agreement,
pending bankruptcy related items in Sacramento and continuing
discussions regarding the landfills.
(d) Report of the Finance Director/Treasurer
Finance Director/Treasurer Gary Streed reviewed the reports included
with the agenda package updating the Committee on the status of the
Districts' cash and investments. He further advised the Committee that
the Districts' agreements with Pacific Investment Management Company,
"PIMCO; to serve as Investment Manager, and Mellon Trust Company, to
serve as Custodial Bank are being finalized, and that funds are expected
to be transferred before month-end. Mr. Streed also reviewed the
remarketing activities for the Series "A," Series "C," and Series "1993
Refunding" COPs, and the interest rate history for the past month.
(e) Report of the Director of Human Resources
Gary Hasenstab, Director of Human Resources, reported that the Orange
County District Attorney had recently notified the Districts that the case
had been closed regarding any criminal negligence in the February 1994
fire at Plant 2 and that no negligence had been found.
(f) Report of General Counsel
Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, reviewed a report contained in the
agenda package and requested that the Committee approve an
adjustment in the fee schedule of his firm's Professional Services
Agreement with the Districts. The Committee recommendation is reported
as FAHR95-34 below.
Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee
Page 3
July 12, 1995
(5) FINAL DRAFT REPORT OF THE ERNST&YOUNG FINANCE FUNCTIONAL
REVIEW OF PURCHASING AND WAREHOUSING. ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCE, AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS.
This report will be presented to the Executive Committee at their meeting of.
July 19, 1995. There was no discussion regarding this item at the meeting.
(6) APPROVAL OF MINUTES
It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the draft minutes of the
June 14, 1995, meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources
Committee.
(7) OLD BUSINESS
FAHR95-25 Classification. Compensation. and Other Terms, Conditions.
Rules and Regulations of Em llooyment
Gary Hasenstab, Director of Human Resources, reviewed the Employee Benefit
Program Summary. The Committee had requested an expanded summary which
included examples and amounts. It was moved, seconded and duly carried to
receive and file this report which is intended to be filed with the original report.
(8) NEW BUSINESS
FAHR95-31 Consideration of Motion to Adoot Investment Performance
Review Guidelines for the Districts' Investment Program
After discussion on this matter, it was moved, seconded and duly carried to
recommend that the Executive Committee approve the following actions:
1. Adopt the investment performance benchmarks for the Liquid Operating
Monies fund, the 3-month T-Bill rate and the Callan Active Cash Fixed-income
Style Group; and the Long-Term Operating Fund, the Merrill Lynch
Government and Corporate 1 to 5-year Maturity Index and the Callan
Defensive Fixed-Income Style Group, as recommended by staff.
2. Adopt the contents and frequency of routine investment performance reports
to be reviewed by the Committee each month or quarter as recommended by
staff.
Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee
Page 4
July 12, 1995
FAHR95-32 Consideration of Proposed Changes to the IRS-Approved
Section 457 Deferred Compensation Plan as follows:
(a) Consideration of Resolution No. 95- Approving First
Amendment to Deferred Compensation Plan for Officers
and Employees in Order to Permit Greater Flexibility in
Plan Distribution Elections, Clarify Certain Provisions of
the Plan. and Comply with Certain Recent Internal Revenue
Service Interpretations.
(b) Consideration of Resolution No. 95- Approving
Amended Deferred Compensation Program for
Management. Professional and Supervisory Employees.
After discussion on this matter, it was moved, seconded and duly carried to
recommend that the Executive Committee approve (a) the First Amendment to the
CSDOC Deferred Compensation Plan which clarifies the Plan and incorporates
I.R.S. changes at no cost to the Districts, and; (b) modifications to the Management,
Professional and Supervisory Employees Deferred Compensation Program only to
add those positions to the program that were approved as a part of the resolution of
the former Confidential Unit last month.
FAHR95-33 Consideration of Orange County Employees Association
(OCEA) Grievance Concerning Side Letter Agreement
After discussion on this matter, it was moved, seconded and duly carried to
recommend that the grievance be denied on the basis that no group of employees
did in fad receive a general increase in salary during the period of November 26,
1993, through November 23, 1996, higher than the negotiated increase received by
the OCEA unit.
FAHR95-34 Consideration of Amendment No. 13 re Agreement for
Employment of General Counsel
The Committee reported their high regard for the services rendered by Rourke,
Woodruff& Spradlin over the past several years. After discussion of alternative
methods to obtain legal services including the current privatizing, developing an in-
house team and a mix of the two, the Committee recommended approval of
Amendment No. 13 re Agreement for Employment of General Counsel, including an
increase in hourly rates for Mr. Woodruff, Principals and Senior Associate,
Associates and Paralegals; and future annual increases based upon the changes in
an index.
The Committee also directed staff and General Counsel to return to a future
meeting with a report regarding alternative methods to obtain legal services.
Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee
Page 5
July 12, 1995
(9) CLOSED SESSION
There was no closed session required.
(10) OTHER BUSINESS, IF ANY
None.
(11) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A
SUBSEQUENT MEETING
The Committee requested two items be considered at future meetings:
A) A review of alternative methods of obtaining legal services,
B) A review of total compensation for exempt employees.
(12) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE
AGENDA FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT
None.
(13) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING DATES AND ITEMS TO BE
DISCUSSED AT THOSE MEETINGS
The Committee will not meet in August, November and December 1995, as no
Executive Committee meetings are scheduled, and no FAHR Committee
recommendation could be carried to the respective Joint Board meetings.
The next Committee meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, September 13, 1995.
(15) ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 7:30 p.m.
!gs
J1N/PDOCIFlMCRANEFPCMfOFPCDSYAHUIESMiAMR]A%
II County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County,California
P.O. Box 8127 • 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127
Telephone: (714)962-2411
wry+ DRAFT
II MINUTES OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
July 26, 1995- 5:30 P.M.
A meeting of the Executive Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13
and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Wednesday, July 26, 1995, at 5:30 p.m., at the
Districts' Administrative offices.
(1) ROLL CALL
The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT:
Present: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel
Larry Seigel, Ernst& Young
John Cox,Jr., Joint Chair Elizabeth Van Denburgh, Ernst &Young
Peer A. Swan, Vice Joint Chair Jay Erhgott, Ernst&Young
Pat McGuigan, Chair, District 1 and Chris Patrick, Ernst&Young
OMITS Chair
John J. Collins, Chair, District 2 and
PDC Chair STAFF PRESENT:
Sal A. Sapien, Chair, District 3
Jan Debay, Chair, District 5 Don McIntyre, General Manager
James Ferryman, Chair, District 6 Gary Hasenstab, Director of Personnel
Barry Hammond, Chair, District 7 Ed Hodges, Director of Maintenance
Thomas Saltarelli, Chair, District 14 Steve Hovey, Director of Information
Roger Stanton, County Supervisor Technology
William Steiner, County Supervisor John Linder, Director of Engineering
Don R. Griffin, Past Joint Chair Bob Ooten, Director of Operations
Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Absent: Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary
Mark Esquer, Operations Engineer
Director George Brown, FAHR Chair Ted Hoffman, Purchasing Manager
Victor Leipzig, Chair, District 11 Steve Kozak, Financial Manager
(2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
Minutes of the Executive Committee 6
Page 2 of 6
July 26, 1995
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no comments by any member of the public.
(4) APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of the June 21, 1995, Executive Committee meeting were approved as revised.
(5) REPORTS OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR, GENERAL MANAGER AND GENERAL COUNSEL
(a) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
The Committee Chair had no report.
(b) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
The General Manager announced the need to consider an additional item not listed
on the agenda. It was moved, seconded and duly carried to consider EXEC95-04 as
an added item on the agenda following the report of General Counsel, that was not
listed through clerical error, to wit: to receive and file the Finance Function Review
prepared by Ernst&Young.
The General Manager reported briefly on the Orange County Financial Recovery
Round Table and deferred to Supervisor Steiner for more details. General Counsel
reported that he had been involved in meetings in the past few weeks, both locally
and in Sacramento, on different proposals on the bankruptcy problems and
recommended solutions. Some of the proposals discussed at the Round Table
meeting were negotiations for waiving the payment of the final 10 cents; a consumer
boycott of Merrill Lynch; requesting Orange County Retirement System to provide
financing on $110 million based on extending the usable life of the County-owned
buildings; equity funding because Orange County is a donor property tax county; no
new taxes; taking special districts portion of the property tax; raiding the reserves of
special districts; actions being considered on the state level, and what results these
actions could have on the Districts.
After a lengthy discussion, staff was directed to analyze the financial and political
options and alternatives including revenue reserve policies and other policies in a
report to be presented at the July 26, 1995 Joint Board meeting.
(c) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
Good news. It was announced at the OCIP meeting today that the amount of post-
petition interest has finally been agreed on—$85 million. These funds should be
available by Friday. The Committee also discussed the Soloman Bros. plan and there
is concern that it doesn't include any way to balance the books. They are trying to �..�
determine how much is needed in hard money without OCIP members taking a hit.
Therefore, there is some urgency on the part of the Sanitation Districts to adopt a
fundamental policy in the near future. Under Proposition 13, user fees can only be
Minutes of the Executive Committee
Page 3 of 6
July 26, 1995
increased an amount equal to the actual increased cost of a service. The Districts
have previously allocated to user fees debt service and this has been acknowledged
by the county and slate as a valid prior encumbrance and commitment, thus exempt
from the tax shift.
EXEC95-04: The management consulting firm of Ernst & Young presented their findings on
the Finance Department, assessing the role and effective of the Finance Department
functions, comparison against industry"leading practices", identifies areas for improvement
and proposes action plans and timelines.
The Directors asked staff if it agreed with the findings of the report. The only disagreement
was the recommendation of a reduction in the size of the warehouse planned for Plant 2.
This has been referred to the PDC Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization.
Staff will be updating the Directors periodically on the status of implementing the
recommended action plans.
A motion was made, seconded and duly carried to receive and file the Finance Function
Review prepared by Ernst & Young, identified as EXEC95-04.
(6) A motion was made, seconded and duly carried to receive and file draft minutes of the
Steering Committee meeting held June 28, 1995.
(7) (a) A motion was made, seconded and duly carried to receive and file draft minutes of the
Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Meeting held July 5,
1995.
(b) A motion was made, seconded and duly carried to concur in the recommended
actions of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Meeting
held July 5, 1995, as follows:
OMTS95-036: Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to enter
into Engineering Feasibility Studies with Southern California Edison
"ENVEST° Program to study energy conservation measures at the
Districts'treatment plants, for an amount not to exceed $30,000.
OMT895-038: Consideration of the following actions re Addendum No. 4 to the
Professional Services Agreement with Ernst& Young, providing for
additional services for the development of documentation and
training for conducting process improvement analysis of key
programs within the Technical Services Department, as follows:
(1) Consideration of motion to receive and file OMTS Committee
certification of the final negotiated fee with Ernst& Young for
�..i said additional services.
Minutes of the Executive Committee
Page 4 of 6
July 26, 1995
`ash
(2) Consideration of resolution approving Addendum No. 4 to
said agreement with Ernst&Young for said additional
services, for an additional amount not to exceed $20,000.00,
increasing the total authorized compensation from
$453,000.00 to an amount not to exceed $473,000.00.
(8) A motion was made, seconded and duly carried to receive and file draft minutes of the Ad
Hoc Committee re Space Utilization Study for Administrative Employees held on July 6,
1995.
(9) (a) A motion was made, seconded and duly carried to receive and file draft minutes of the
Planning, Design and Construction Committee Meeting held July 6, 1995.
(b) A motion was made, seconded and duly carried to concur in the recommended
actions of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee Meeting held July 6,
1995, as follows:
PDC95-23: Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the
plans and specifications for Miscellaneous Improvements at Plant
No. 1, Job No. P1-42, and Miscellaneous Improvements at Plant
No. 2, Job No. P2-49, for a credit of$18,941.00 to the contract
with Pascal & Ludwig Engineers for two items of additional work L�
and three items of deleted work. This item does not need Joint
Boards approval.
PDC95-24: Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a purchase
order to Pioneer-Standard Electronics for the purchase of two new
VAX 4000 Model 705A computers for Plant No. 2 plant automation
for the Ocean Oulfall Booster Station, in an amount not to exceed
$357,266.95 plus tax; and to delay to the September meeting any
decision on the purchase of 32 Pentium Personal Computers,
after competitive quotes have been received.
PDC95-25: Consideration of motion to authorize the Ad Hoc Committee re
Space Utilization Study to solicit, negotiate, award and issue
purchase orders to various vendors for Modifications to the
Existing Interior Office Space in the Administration Building for
General Management, Administration and Communications
Offices, Specification No. E-256, in an amount not to exceed
$130,000 (reduced from the PDC recommendation of$165,200).
(10) (a) A motion was made, seconded and duly carried to receive and file draft minutes of the
Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting held July 12,
1995.
Minutes of the Executive Committee
Page 5 of 6
July 26, 1995
(b) A motion was made, seconded and duly carried to concur in the recommended
actions of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting
held July 12, 1995, as follows:
FAHR95-31: Consideration of motion to adopt Investment Performance Review
Guidelines for the Districts' Investment Program.
FAHR95-32: Consideration of Proposed Changes to the IRS-Approved Section
457 Deferred Compensation Plan as follows:
(a) Consideration of resolution approving amendment to
Deferred Compensation Plan for Officers and Employees in
order to permit greater flexibility in plan distribution
elections, clarify certain provisions of the Plan, and comply
with certain recent Internal Revenue Service interpretations.
(b) Consideration of resolution approving Amended Deferred
Compensation Program for Management,Professional and
Supervisory Employees, to include those positions in the
former Confidential Unit in the program.
FAHR95-34 Consideration of Amendment No. 13 re Agreement for
Employment of General Counsel, incorporating increases in
`d compensation in accordance with proposal, effective August 1,
1995, and subject to a cap in the CPI of 4% per year.
(11) The following items were considered by the Executive Committee:
EXEC95-01 PROPOSED CONSOLIDATION OF THE DISTRICTS:
This item has been discussed many times in the past and staff has
developed a proposed model for discussion. The action requested by the
motion is to authorize staff to commence the LAFCO process which is not
binding. One of the main issues is the agreement with IRWD now under
negotiation. Staff indicated that these items can be resolved through
ongoing negotiations and prior to finalizing the deal with IRWD.
A motion was made, seconded and carried (6 ayes-3 noes) to receive and
file Staff report regarding consolidation of the nine seprate districts;
consideration of a resolution approving consolidation of the nine separate
districts into one single sanitation district; with a single board of directors
made up of one representative each for every city, sanitary district, water
district and unincorporated portion of the County within the sanitation
districts' service area and now represented on one or more of the existing
nine sanitation districts; direct staff to initiate all steps necessary, including
the LAFCO process, to complete a reorganization of the sanitation district
as outlined in this motion and to continue negotiations with IRWD.
Minutes of the Executive Committee
Page 6 of 6
July 26, 1995
EXEC95-03 APPOINTMENT OF ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER:
After noting that the FAHR Committee did not make a recommendation on
this motion, rather it moved to pass the item to the Executive Committee, a
motion was made, seconded and carried to approve filling the Assistant
General Manager-Administration position at the top of the classification
range and to so recommend to the Joint Boards.
(12) CLOSED SESSION
There was no need for a Closed Session.
(13) OTHER BUSINESS
(14) MATTERS TO BE REPORTED ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING
There were no matters to be reported on at a subsequent meeting.
(15) MATTERS ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT.
There were no matters for a future agenda.
(16) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING
The next Executive Committee meeting is scheduled for September 20, 1995.
(17) ADJOURNMENT
The Executive Committee adjourned at approximately 8:16 p.m.
Submitted by:
n Tappan, Sec tary
�0L 73085.MIN
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
AGENDAFOR
JULY 26, 1995
Item (12)(b)(1): OMTS95-036: Consideration of motion authorizing the
General Manager to enter Into an Engineering Feasibility
Studies Agreement with the Southern California Edison
"ENVEST" Program to study energy conservation
measures at the Districts' treatment plants for an
amount not to exceed $30,000.
Summary
Over the past five or six months, staff and Southern California Edison (Edison) have
developed a series of energy conservation projects that qualify for an Edison program
called ENVEST. In the ENVEST program Edison pays for engineering feasibility
reports, design, and construction of energy conservation measures. The Districts would
pay Edison for the project out of utility bill savings from the projects that are constructed.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Boards of Directors authorize the General Manager to enter
into a first-phase feasibility report contract with Edison, for an amount not to exceed
$30,000, to study energy conservation measures proposed by staff at the Districts'
treatment plants.
OMTS Committee Recommendation
The OMTS Committee recommends that the Boards of Directors authorize the General
Manager to enter into a first-phase feasibility report contract with Edison, for an amount
not to exceed $30,000, to study energy conservation measures proposed by staff at the
Districts' treatment plants. The one stipulation being that, before any additional money
is spent, the item is brought back before the OMTS Committee for approval.
Executive Committee Recommendation
The Executive Committee concurs with the OMTS Committee recommendation.
�.d
COUNTY SANITATION DImius
AI ORANGE COUNTY,CAUFORNIA
June 22, 1995 1OW ELLIS AVENUE
P.O.DOX8122
FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA W72M127
(71a)%2-VI1
Staff Report
OMTS95-036: Consideration of Motion Authorizing the General Manager to Enter
Into Engineering and Design Studies and a Proposal with the
Southern California Edison "ENVEST" Program to study energy
conservation measures at the Districts' treatment plants for an
amount not to exceed $30,000.
The Southern California Edison (Edison) Company is offering a program called
ENVEST to assist customers with the implementation of energy conservation
projects. Edison will provide overall contract administration of the project including
engineering and design studies and construction of cost effective energy
conservation measures. The cost of the project will be paid by the customer on
future utility bills, offset by the electricity savings of the project.
The Districts' staff has reviewed the ENVEST program to see if there are projects
that qualify and staff has been working with HDR, a local environmental
�✓ engineering consultant, to submit a list of projects at Plants No. 1 and 2 for
Edison's review. The submitted projects have met Edison's criteria for cost
effective projects. The projects submitted are attached in HDR's letter of May 18,
1995. The energy conservation measures identified provide an estimated savings
of 7,000,000 kilowatt hours annually. The electricity savings potentially represent
about 7% of the Districts' treatment plants annual electricity usage. The specific
projects are listed below:
Plant No. 1:
-Plant water system revisions
-Trickling filter inlet piping modifications
-Digester mixing control modifications
-Dewatered sludge cake pumping modifications
Plant No. 2:
-Plant water system revisions
-Modifications to the cryogenic compressor
Based on the favorable review of the project, Edison has developed a Proposal
Development Agreement for the Districts to contract for the ENVEST Program.
OMTS95-036
Page 2
June 22, 1995
With the Districts' Boards concurrence, Edison will cause engineering and design
studies to be prepared to further evaluate the energy conservation measure. The
engineering and design studies of the presently listed projects are estimated to cost
$24,000. Edison and the Districts will review the study. With concurrence by the
Districts' Board and Edison, an Implementation and Financing Agreement would be
prepared for preparation of plans and specifications, and Edison ultimately hiring a
contractor for construction of the project. Staff will be involved at all levels to
ensure compliance with Districts' needs, practices and requirements. The total
investment is estimated to be between $1.5 and $2.0 million. Project payoff is
estimated to be 5 to 7 years.
Staff recommends the Districts' Board of Directors authorize the General Manager
to enter into a Preliminary Assessment Agreement with Edison to evaluate energy
conservation measures at the Districts' treatment plants at a cost not to exceed
$30,000.
a
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
AGENDAFOR
JULY 26, 1995
Item (12)(b)(2): OMTS95-038: Consideration of motion authorizing the
General Manager to approve Addendum No. 4 to the
Professional Services Agreement with Ernst &Young to
include services for development of documentation and
provide training for conducting process improvement
analysis of key programs within the Technical Services
Department for an amount not to exceed $20,000
Summary
At the January 11, 1995, Joint Board meeting, the Directors authorized Ernst & Young (E&Y) to
conduct an evaluation of the Technical Services Department(TSD). The evaluation is complete
and the final report is being prepared. A presentation by E&Y to the Directors on the finding
and recommendations of the evaluation should be forthcoming.
A finding in E&Y's report is that there are opportunities for TSD to refine the programs we
manage in order to become more efficient and cost-effective. In order to address the
opportunity, E&Y recommends that TSD conduct process improvement analysis to identify, and
hopefully implement, what opportunities are available.
The methodology for conducting this analysis is complicated and staff requires direction and
training to implement it. E&Y has provided TSD with a proposal to conduct training on process
improvement analysis and provide documentation for continuing this effort.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends authorizing the General Manager to approve Addendum No. 4 to the
Professional Services Agreement with Ernst &Young to include services for development of
documentation and provide training for conducting process improvement of key programs within
the Technical Services Department for an amount not to exceed $20,000.
OMTS Committee Recommendation
The OMTS Committee recommends authorizing the General Manager to approve Addendum
No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with Ernst&Young to include services for
development of documentation and provide training for conducting process improvement of key
programs within the Technical Services Department for an amount not to exceed $20,000.
Executive Committee Recommendation
The Executive Committee concurs with the recommendation of the OMTS Committee.
June 21, 1995
STAFF REPORT
OMTS95-038: Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to
approve Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services
Agreement with Ernst & Young to include services for
development of documentation and provide training for
conducting process improvement analysis of key programs
within the Technical Services Department for an amount not
to exceed $20,000
Background
At the January 11, 1995, Joint Board meeting, the Directors authorized Ernst &
v.d Young (E&Y) to conduct an evaluation of the Technical Services Department (TSD).
The purpose of this evaluation was to inventory the TSD's strengths and weaknesses,
clarify the TSD's mission, goals and objectives, and develop an action plan to
address those aspects of the Department that can be enhanced and to identify
concomitant resource needs.
E&Y kicked off its evaluation in February 1995 with a series of work-group focus
meetings with key Department staff. The focus meetings were used to identify the
main processes common to all TSD divisions along with defining the inputs/outputs,
affected divisions, and customers involved with each process. This exercise has
been valuable in providing a common denominator among the five divisions.
E&Y's evaluation also included interviews with internal customers to TSD (i.e.
Operations, Maintenance and Engineering), conducting a needs survey of all TSD
staff, conducting a survey of external wastewater treatment organizations similar to
the Districts to determine how they were organized and how they managed similar
issues being addressed by TSD, and organizing a third work-group focus meeting
involving the General Manager's office and other departments. The information
gathered through all these meetings, surveys and interviews have been used to
develop a draft report on the current status of the Department with recommendations
on areas for improvement.
w
OMTS95-038
Page 2
June 21, 1995
E&Y's draft report has been sent to the TSD department for comments and is
currently being finalized. We anticipate that the final report should be completed
within the next few weeks and a presentation on the report should be made by E&Y
to the Directors in the near future. The purpose of this staff report is to request
further professional services from E&Y to develop documentation and conduct
training necessary to implement recommendations by E&Y for evaluating where
improvements can be made on the major processes and programs undertaken by the
Department.
Process Improvement Training
E&Y has categorized the work conducted by TSD into five processes; namely,
Regulatory Analysis, Program Development, Program Implementation, Program
Assessment, and Reporting and Feedback. These processes are common to all the
major programs managed by the five divisions. E&Y has identified several processes
encompassing several of the major programs (i.e., Marine Monitoring and Laboratory
Services) where improvements can be made to allow TSD to operate more efficiently
and cost-effectively. An example of areas for improvement include development of
clear procedures, defining clear roles and responsibilities, improving communication,
development and review of reports and development of an effective feedback loop
from the customers. The methodology for conducting evaluations of the processes to
evaluate areas for improvement and develop action plans is complicated and time
consuming and, therefore, direction and training is needed to ensure that staff
implement this process correctly and cost effectively. E&Y has provided the Districts
with a proposal to train key Department staff on techniques to conduct this analysis
along with providing reference documentation that can be used by staff.
E&Y's proposal consists of two all-day training sessions involving Department
managers, supervisors and key staff. The training will focus on where improvements
can be made for two major TSD programs. For each of the two major programs, the
training will consist of objective setting, defining the current status, identifying root
causes of problems, identifying value vs non-value tasks, brainstorming techniques
for improvements, analyzing alternatives, brainstorming on the desired future state of
the program and developing improvement action plans to get us there.
Documentation of this process will then be prepared and made available to staff for
conducting further improvement evaluations on other programs.
OMTS95-038
Page 3
June 21, 1995
The total not-to-exceed cost for providing the process improvement training and
development of the documentation is $20,000. The deliverables will be the current
state, desired future state and improvement action plan for two major programs;
training of all TSD Department managers, supervisors and key staff (up to 25
people); and documentation that will assist staff in effectively conducting further
process improvements.
The Directors have asked staff to place increased attention on the cost of the
services we provide. The 1995 proposed budget reflects staffs initial attempt to
identify performance measures that reflect the cost of doing business and to
benchmark ourselves against similar organizations. The training proposed by E&Y
will take us further in this direction by providing TSD staff with the tools necessary to
evaluate and implement more cost-effective approaches to how we do business
and/or improvements that result in a higher quality service.
Recommendation
Staff recommends authorizing the General Manager to approve Addendum No. 4 to
the Professional Services Agreement with Ernst & Young to include services for
development of documentation and provide training for conducting process
improvement analysis of key programs within the Technical Services Department for
an amount not to exceed $20,000.
Ref#Jlwp\3510bperwmm\eytmg2.exe
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
F.O. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
N
10844 ELLIS. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018
�+xcecW"� (714)982-2411
June 21, 1995
Boards of Directors
County Sanitation Districts of
Orange County
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Ca .92708
Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Addendum No. 4 to the Professional
Services Agreement with Ernst & Young
In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional engineering
services, the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee has negotiated
the following fee for Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with Ernst
d.d & Young, providing services for development of documentation and provide training for
conducting process improvement analysis of key programs within the Technical Services
Department for an amount Dot to exceed $20,000.
Existing Change per Amended
Agreement Addendum Agreement
Original Professional Agreement $85,000
Addendum No. 1 $150,000 $235,000
Addendum No. 2 60,000 295,000
Addendum No. 3 158,000 453,000
Addendum No. 4 20,000 473,000
T
Boards of Directors
County Sanitation Districts of
Orange County
June 21, 1995
Page Two
The OMTS Committee hereby certifies the above fee as reasonable for the services to
be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant.
/s/ Director Pat Mc Guigan /s/ Director Victor Lei zp�p'
Director Pat Mc Guigan, Chair Director Victor Leipzig, Vice Chair
OMTS Committee OMTS Committee
/s/ Ed Torres �J
Ed Torres
Director of Technical Services
OMTS Committee
MBN:dm
REF#J:\3500\510035A.LTR
y JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
9
�- AGENDA FOR
JULY 26, 1995
ITEM (12)(b)(3): PDC96-24: Consideration of motion authorizing staff to
issue a purchase order to Pioneer-Standard Electronics
for the Purchase of Two VAX 400 Model 705A
Computers for Plant No. 2 Plant Automation for the
Ocean Outfall Booster Station (Specification No. E-257),
in an amount not to exceed $357,266.95 plus tax.
Summary
The Planning, Design and Construction Committee discussed the status of the Plant
Automation Computer System it has previously approved, and the factors leading
toward a required upgrade in computer hardware at Plant 2. This upgrade will save the
Districts' considerable time, money and effort. The formal proposal for the hardware
was presented.
Staff Recommendation
Staff requested authority to proceed with final negotiations in response to a formal
proposal from Pioneer-Standard Electronics, Inc. for the computer hardware upgrade of
two existing VAX 400, model 300 computers to VAX 4000, model 705A computers for
Plant 2 plant automation and the purchase of 32 DEC Pentium personal computers for
Operations at both Plants 1 and 2, for an amount not to exceed $543,132.43 plus tax.
PDC Committee Recommendation to the Executive Committee
After discussion, staff was directed to delete the 32 personal computers from the project
and bid them separately.
The PDC Committee recommends authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to
Pioneer-Standard Electronics for Two VAX 400 Model 705A computers for Plant 2 plant
automation, in an amount not to exceed $357,266.95 plus tax.
Executive Committee Recommendation to the Joint Boards of Directors
The Executive Committee concurs with the recommendation of the PDC Committee.
J 1WpWPBSAGbb1-1Rl
July 6, 1995
Revised July 13, 1995
STAFF REPORT
PLANT AUTOMATION
Summary
The purpose of this document is to present to the Joint Boards of Directors both the status
of the Plant Automation computer systems it has approved to date and the factors leading
toward a required upgrade in computer hardware at Plant 2. This upgrade will save the
Districts considerable time, money and effort. Finally, the formal proposal for the hardware
upgrade will be presented for consideration at the conclusion of this report.
Background
The HSQ system was intended to only monitor plant processes - not provide control. In
the years that have passed since the specifications were written, the facilities have
expanded and the needs have changed. Distributed control (versus monitoring only) is
.d now agreed to be a need in an ever-increasing attempt to be more efficient and reduce
operating costs. This need for distributed control has resulted in an ever-widening gap
between what was originally envisioned in the Master Plan and what is now required; a
fully-integrated system with common operator interface at either the local Human Machine
Interface (HMI) located at the Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) within the plants or
any of the many computer workstations throughout the Districts. This proposed distributed
control system could be easily expanded without any major changes in configuration,
software or hardware.
In January 1993 CH2M Hill was awarded a Professional Services Agreement for Job J-31.
Briefly, this agreement was to provide engineering services for the preparation of
construction and supporting documents, and to update the current operations and
maintenance manuals. Also, it was to provide construction support and training for the
project including the connection of existing PLCs to the SCADA system and a new PLC-
based Ocean Outfall Booster Station(OOBS)control system, develop graphic displays and
PLC programming guidelines, and modify existing and prepare new plans and
specifications for the integration of remaining facilities into the plant computer monitoring
system installed by Jobs J-23-1 and P2-04.
Job No. J-31 was originally intended to finish what the HSQ system started. Later, when
it appeared that control functions were needed, the project began to investigate making
those changes as well. Serious questions arose as to the long-term viability of the HSQ
system and whether it could be modified and expanded cost-effectively by contractors
other than HSQ.
In December 1993 the Engineering Department contracted with CH2M Hill to conduct a
needs analysis (based on current requirements) to determine what would be required to
move the system from a monitoring-only system to a monitoring and control system, as well lam/
as an evaluation of the HSQ/Miser system's compliance with specifications. The results
of this study are found in a Technical Memorandum from CH2M Hill dated February 11,
1994, and "Job J-31 Addendum 1, Study Results and Recommendations"dated April 1994.
CH2M Hill's Technical Memorandum mainly identifies the problems found in the original
specifications. The"Study Results and Recommendations" study gives a broader view of
the issues and, as implied by the title, gives specific recommendations of how the Districts
could proceed.
In brief, the study concluded that the HSQ system was unnecessarily complex, too slow
and too inflexible to meet the projected needs of the Districts. The HSQ system, with the
hardware configuration that was delivered and installed, may not meet the performance
specifications for monitoring with the continued increasing number of PI-Cs above the
original specification. The addition of more PLCs, HMIs and a combination of PC or VAX
computer workstations onto the process control network in the future could degrade the
system's performance to an unacceptable level. The most critical issue was the slow
processing time. This was a result of the complexity of the hardware configuration, as well
as the specified model of VAX computer supplied by HSQ.
In July 1994 the Districts adopted Option 3. This option reduced the number of
programming levels from five to three greatly simplifying the system architecture and
system support requirements. The Joint Boards of Directors authorized the purchase of
two Digital Equipment Corporation VAX 4000, Model 700A computer systems for Plant 1
and a software site license for Plant 1 and Plant 2 utilizing a Square D, Crisp 32 Process
Control Application Package.
In January 1995 installation of the VAX 4000, Model 700A began at Plant 1, and the first
phase was successfully completed in March 1995 with five Modicon PI-Cs directly
connected to the computer system. At this point all Allen Bradley data concentrators were
removed from the Plant 1 system. Work has continued to date with eleven Modicon PI-Cs
now on line. In addition, the J-28 Pump Station Telemetry System was fully integrated into
the process control system reducing an island of automation. Further PLC integration will
continue at Plant 1 until completion later this year in preparation for CH2M HILL's rewrite
of PLC logic to the Districts' standards.
Hardware Upgrade
The computer hardware obtained in 1991 to support the Laboratory Information
Management System (LIMS) and Computer Maintenance Management System (CMMS)
(two DEC VAX 4000, model 300 computers)was replaced by two DEC Alpha AXP systems
in February 1995. A proposal was made to upgrade them to VAX 4000, model 705As and
transfer the current software licenses to the new models. Upgrading the units and
transferring the licenses will result in a savings to the Districts of approximately $70,000 ..
2
and will result in replacing the current DEC VAX 4000, model 200 at Plant 2.
`. This upgrade will be required for the continuation of CH2M Hill's work and to meet the
goals and expectations of the Operations Department outlined in the Master Plan requiring
a fully-integrated computer network.
The new computer system will be required to be installed and fully operational before the
start of construction of the replacement control system located at the Ocean Ouffall
Booster Station (it is estimated that construction will commence early next year) if a fully-
integrated system is to be achived thus reducing the stand-alone islands of automation.
The upgrade will allow remote operation of this facility to be implemented thus reducing the
need for in-building staffing by at least one operator per shift to do other duties.
The use of Square D CRISP 32 process control software will standardize the process
control databases of Job No. J-28, titled Pump Station and Telemetry System for Plant
Nos. 1 and 2 and the Ocean Outfall Booster Station, allowing the Operations staff to
monitor and remotely control processes within the plants from any computer workstation
attached to the network and further reducing the software maintenance support
requirements in the future.
It is also important to note that all of the computer hardware provided by Job Nos. J-23-2
and P2-44 from HSQ will be put to good use. The utilization of computer hardware is
shown below in Table 1.
TABLE 1
Provided by HSQ New Use
2 VAX 4000-200 Servers Plant Automation software test bed to test
software changes - one at each plant. (This is
per a strong recommendation made by CH2M
Hill's Results.)
2 VAX 4000-200 Servers Provide Engineering a loaner machine for
consultants to verify PLC logic and software
changes.
10 VAX 4000-VLC Reused on new process control system at both
plants.
3
Recommendation
The following recommendation is presented for consideration: �..�
Staff requests authority to proceed with final negotiations in response to a formal proposal
from Pioneer-Standard Electronics, Inc. for the computer hardware upgrade of two existing
VAX 4000, model 300 computers to VAX 4000, model 705A computers for Plant 2
automation for an amount not to exceed $357,266.95, plus tax.
SS:cs
H:\WPDOCSGSNYDER\C0MMITTEIB0ARD2.SS
4
Proposal For:
Orange County Sanitation District
Fountain Valley, California
Ms. Doreen Scarano
Pioneer-Standard Electronics, Inc.
Irvine Sales Office
(714) 753-5090
July 7, 1995
QUOTATION
952P584559-02
15-Jun-95
QUOTATION EXPIRES: 14-Aug-95
TO: FROM:
Orange County Sanitation District Pioneer Standard
10844 Ellis Ave 217 Technology Drive
Fountain Valley,CA 92728 Irvine,CA 92718
Attn: Attn:
Stuart Severn Doreen Scarano
Account Executive
Thank you for your inquiry. We are pleased to quote as follows:
ITEM QTY MODEL NUMBER AND DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE EXTENDED
1 2 DV47RFA-FA $67,018.71 5134,037.42
Rackmount 4705A Adv Sry 128mb
1 694QL-C9 RKMT 4505A SBB
1 MS690-DA 128NM MEMORY
1 QL-005A2-60 OPN VMS BASE LI
I QZ-00FAA-GZ SYS DOC SET
I RF36E-AA 1.6Gb 3.5"DSSI
1 RRD43-JA 600MB CD Rom
I KZQSA-SA Q-BUS ADAPT RRD
1 QI MCIA2-AA NAS 200 LIC
I QL-XAIA2-AA VMS DW MOTIF LI
Estim.Lead Time(Business Days)-20 Day Shipment
Includes 1-Year System Support;5D by 9H;Digital Installed
2 2 B401X-A9 58,239.77 $16,479.54
Rack-mountable VAX/DS Q-Bus89
expansion enclosure.
Twelve Q-Bus slots,four ISE
positions.
BA431 chassis including
slides and brackets for
mounting in 19"wide
cabinets.
Universal power supply.
Bstim.Lead Time(Business Days)-22 Day Shipment
Includes 1-Year Hardware Option Support
-2-
QUOTATION
952PS84559-02
15-Jun-95
QUOTATION EXPIRES: 14-Aug-95
ITEM QTY MODEL NUMBER AND DESCRIP71ON UNIT PRICE EXTENDED
3 2 QL-XULA9-BF $2,907.54 $5,815.08
OpnVMSN I/A 16 User License
Software Product Descr.25.01
16 User License with
Operating System requires the
presence of an OpenVMS VAX
Operating System Base License
Estim.Lead Time(Business Days)- 1 Day Shipment
Includes I-Year Layered Product Software License Support
PAK Delivery Method:Paper
4 5 RZ28-VA S1,699.00 $8,495.00
SCSI Yard Disk Drive
o 2.l-GB capacity
0 3.5-inch by 1.625-inch size
o Mounted in a single
%ftw, 3.5-inch storage building
block snap-in carrier
Estim.Lead Time(Business Days)-20 Day Shipment
Includes 5 Years Warranty;Year I
Onsite,Years 2-5 Return-to-Digital.
Customer Installed.
5 4 H9702-EA S5,670.00 $22,680.00
UNSHIELDED 81"CABINET WITH
2 877-DA POWER CONT
Estim.Lead Time Business Days)-30 Day Shipment
Includes 1-Year Hardware Option Support
6 2 TZ86E-MX S4,753.00 $9,506.00
6GB SCSI tape drive embedded
for DEC4000s.
Estim.Lead Time(Business Days)- 10 Days Shipment
Includes 2 Years Warranty; Year 1
Onsite,Year 2 Retum-to-Digital.
Customer Installed.
-3-
QUOTATION
952PS84559-02
15-Jun-95
QUOTATION EXPIRES: 14-Aug-95
ITEM QTY MODEL NUMBER AND DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE EXTENDED
7 3 KZQSA-SA $2,234.00 $6,702.00
TLZ041RRD40 controller for
BA2xx,BA4xx enclosures.
Factory installed.
Estim.Lead Time(Business Days)-10 Days Shipment
Includes I Year Onsite Warranty.
Digital Installed.
8 1 TLZ6L-VA $3,950.00 $3,950.00
4 Cb.DAT tape with multi
cartridge loader.Fits in
5.25" snap-in carrier.
Includes:
Four cartridge magazine
5 data cartridges
Cleaning cartridge
Estim.Lead Time(Business Days)-40 Day Shipment
Includes 1 Year Onsite Warranty.
Customer Installed.
Hardware Installation Service 5640.00
9 3 BC09D.06 $65.00 $195.00
SCSI Cable
0 6-foot length
0 50-pin high density to
50-pin low density
connectors
Estim.Lead Time(Business Days)-3 Days Shipment
10 2 2T-BA350-SF $883.00 $1,766.00
Front mounting RM BA350
includes BA350-SB,BA35X-HA,
BN27S-03,rack-mount kit,
nip-down front dress bezel
and factory installation.
Requires 7 inches or rack
space.
Replaces 2T-BA35X-FK.
Estim.Lead Time(Business Days)-30 Day Shipment
Includes 3 Years Warranty;Year I
Onsite,Years 2-3 Return-to-Digital.
Customer Installed.
-4.
\J QUOTATION
952PS84559-02
15-Jun-95
QUOTATION EXPIRES: 14-Aug-95
ITEM QTY MODEL NUMBER AND DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE EXTENDED
11 1 2T-BA350-SR $710.00 $710.00
Second BA350 back-to-back
with 2T.BA350-SF. Includes
BA350-SB,BA35X-HA,BN27S-03
and factory installation.
Estim.Lead Time(Business Days)-30 Day Shipment
Includes 3 Years Warranty;Year I
Onsite,Years 2-3 Return-to-Digital.
Customer Installed.
12 1 DEBMP-MA $5,635.30 $59635.30
DECSWITCH 900EE-six port
Ethernet/IEEE 8023 bridge
Two AUI and four 10BaseT
front panel connections
Operates in DEChub 900
MultiSwitch and DEChub ONE
8,000 addresses with source
address,destination address
and protocol filtering
"Router ready"so that
routing can easily be added
in the future via a downline
load into non-volitile memory
when the routing cede is
available.
Estim.Lead Time(Business Days)-5 Days Shipment
Includes l-Year Product Foundation Warranty
Hardware Installation Service $400.00
13 1 DEHUA-CA $329.00 S329.00
DEChub ONE-90 Watts
Single Slot DEChub-Ethernet
with AUI connector,90W power
supply,Hub setup port,Hub
OBM port.Accepts one DEChub
900 series full height
network module.
US/CAN/JAP power cord.
�.,.� Estim.Lead Time(Business Days)- 15 Day Shipment
Includes l-Year Product Foundation Warranty
Hardware Installation Service $300.00
-5 -
QUOTATION
952PS845S9.02
IS-Jun-9S
QUOTATION EXPIRES: 14-Aug-95
ITEM QTY MODEL NUMBER AND DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE EXTENDED
14 6 DSRVW-EC $3,374.60 $20,247.60
DECserver 700 Comm Server,
8 line RS232,4MB Memory,
Network Access Softwre
License,Accessory Kit,
US power cord,manual,
120240V with FLASH
Estim.Lead Time(Business Days)-5 Days Shipment
Includes 1-Year Product Foundation Warranty
Hardware Installation Service 5885.00
15 2 BC21M-09 $177.00 $354.00
Dual-Host Cable
Fstim.Lead Time(Business Days)- 1 Day Shipment
16 1 QA-MCIAA-H8 5217.50 $2I7.50
Network Application Support
200 for VAX/VMS -
DECneWAX Est
PATHWORKS for VMS
PATHWORKS for Macintosh
Remote System Manager Client
Rdb/VMS Run-Time Option
VMS/ULTRIX CONNECTION UCX
Software Product Dexr..36.96
Licensed Binaries and
Documentation on Compact Disk
(CDROM)
Estim.Lead Time(Business Days)- 1 Day Shipment
17 1 QA-MCIAA-H5 $761.25 $761.25
Network Application Support
200 for VAX/VMS
DECnet/VAX Ext
PATHWORKS for VMS
PATHWORKS for Macintosh
Remote System Manager Client
Rdb/VMS Run-Time Option
VMS/ULTRIX CONNECTION UCX
Software Product Descr. 36.86
Licensed Binaries and
Documentation on TK50
Cartridge
Estim.Lead Time(Business Days)-30 Day Shipment
.6-
QUOTATION
952PS84559.02
15-Jun-95
QUOTATION EXPIRES: 14-Aug-95
ITEM QTY MODEL NUMBER AND DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE EXTENDED
18 4 QM4rLAA-Al S178.35 $713.40
PATHWORKS V5 for DOS and
Windows(LAN Manager)
PATHWORKS DOS/Windows-based
client using LAN Manager
for file services
Includes right to access
PATHWORKS LAN Manager
servers and use client
software
License:PC-style
Single license per PAY.
Software Product Desc:55.07
Estim.Lead Time(Business Days)- 1 Day Shipment
PAK Delivery Method:Paper
19 1 FM-INSTL-12 $3,500.00 $3.500.00
This pan number is to be
utilized for processing
customer orders for hardware
installation of DEC products
purchased by the End-User
from a Digital Authorized
Distributor.
Estim.Lead Time(Business Days)-30 Day Shipment
20 160 QS.96NA9-CH S140.00 $22,400.00
SYSTEMS ANALYST
Estim.Lead Time(Business Days)-30 Day Shipment
21 l VT520-CA S456.00 S456.00
VT520 Text Terminal
o Mullisession
o Monochrome amber phosphor
display
o Supports ASCII,ANSI,and
PCTerm protocols
o 120 V/140V
o Northern Hemisphere model
o Power cord
o No keyboard
o No communications cable
U.S./Canadian/Mexican/Central
American model
Estim.Lead Time(Business Days)-5 Days Shipment
Includes 3-Year Product Foundation Warranty
-7-
QUOTATION
952PS94559.02
15-Jun-95
QUOTATION EXPIRES: 14-Aug-95
ITEM QTY MODEL NUMBER AND DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE EXTENDED
22 9 H0345-AA $795.00 $7,155.00
2MG FLASH CARD
Esdm.Lead Time(Business Days)-5 Days Shipment
Includes 1-Year Product Foundation Warranty
23 2 RF36E-AA $2,593.00 $5,186.00
1.6 GB 3.5"DSSI ISE/BA400
fac
One drive,expandable to two
All VAX4000's,except Model
100.
Also for R400X.
Factory Installed
Estim.Lead Time(Business Days)-9 Days Shipment
Includes 1 Year Onshe Warranty.
Customer Installed
24 4 PV71A-BC S16,764.90 $67,059.60
VS4000-96 Base System
Hardware includes:
o KA49-CA CPU module
O 54-21177-03 new CPU module
o BA46A-B9 enclosure
o Fear 16-MB parity memory
0 1-GB SCSI disk
0 600-NM CD-ROM
c SCSI controller
o Ethernet LCSPX graphics
controller
o Keyboard
o Three-button mouse
O Power cords
o Documentation
Software/licenses include:
o OpenVMS V6.1
o OpenVMS 1-user license
o NAS 150license
Esdm.Lead Time(Business Days)-10 Days Shipment
Includes l-Yr HW Onsite/Y2-3 Return to DigitaWO-day SW
-8-
QUOTATION
952PS84559-02
15-Jun-95
QUOTATION EXPIRES: 14-Aug-95
ITEM QTY MODEL NUMBER AND DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE EXTENDED
25 6 VRC21-HA $2,377.71 $14,266.26
Color Monitor
Northern Hemisphere model
o 21-irt W2D-iwh vertical
screen
o VGA2 to 1280 x 1024 at
72 Hz
0120 VIM
o MPRII
Includes I-Year Hardware Option Support
SUBTOTAL S358,616.95
Hardware Installation Service $6,650.00
Less Quote Allowance Amours[ (S81000.00)
(Trade-In of 2 VAX 4000/300 Systems @ S4000/ea
r� NETTOTALAMOUNT $357,266.95
This quotation is an invitation in offer only.It shall remain firm until the expiration date
shown,unless modified in writing by Pioneer-Standard Electronics,Inc.prior to our
acceptance of your contract offer. This quotation is subject to credit approval and any
contract arising from this offer will be subject in Pioneer-Standard's General Terms and
Conditions. These terms and conditions are attached to this quotation or if not attached
are available upon request.
Export of these products required prior written authorization from the U.S.Department
of Commerce.
Quotation Prepared by:
Pioneer-Standard Electronics,Incorporated
Vr�
-9-
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
AGENDA FOR
JULY 26, 1995
Item (12)(b)(4): PDC95-26: Consideration of motion to approve the Ad Hoc
Committee recommendations re Space Utilization Study for
actions required to solicit, negotiate,award and Issue
purchase orders to various vendors for Modifications to the Existing Interior Office Spaces in the
Administration Building for the General Management,Administration and Communication
Offices, Specification No. E-256, In an amended amount not to exceed $130,000.00.
Summary
The PDC Committee is charged with the overseeing of the Districts'Planning, Design and Construction
activities. The PDC Committee has further established an Ad Hoc Committee to study administration
space utilization for current and immediate future staffing requirements. The Ad Hoc Committee is also
looking into long-term administration space needs.
One of the Immediate administration space requirements concerns office modifications and
reconfiguration for the two newly established Assistant General Manager positions and the added
Administrative Secretarial staff which provides direct support to the two Assistant General Managers,
and the reorganized Communications Office.
The office modifications need to be started by the antl of July in order to provide adequate facilities for
the above mentioned staff. By delegating authority to the PDC Committee for this work, a minimum of
60 days will be deleted from the solicitation, awarding and construction process.
The work to be done will be performed in two steps covering a two or three week period. The first step
will be the removal of the existing floor-to-celling partition walls. The partition walls will be reconfigured
and remodeled to fit the new floor plan layout and to add glass where solid walls now stand . The
second phase will be to remove the existing partitions and reconfigure It to fit the new floor plan layout.
In addition to the wall and partition changes,the job will include installation of all electrical,
communications, computers, and furniture necessary to support the staffing changes.
This new office reconfiguration will utilize over seventy percent of the existing equipment and the
Districts will need to order only thirty percent more equipment to finish the reconfiguration.
The cost of the mentioned work is estimated to be$165,250.00.
Staff Recommendation
That the PDC Committee authorize the Ad Hoc Committee to solicit, negotiate, award and Issue
purchase orders for modifications to the existing interior office spaces in the Administration Building,
Specification No. E-256,in an amount not to exceed $165,250.00.
PDC Committee Recommendation to the Executive Committee
That the Ad Hoc Committee be authorized to solicit, negotiate, award and issue purchase orders for
Modifications to the Existing Interior Office Spaces In the Administration Building for the General
Management Administration and Communication Offices, Specification No. E-256, in an amount not to
exceed $165,250.00.
Executive Committee Recommendation to the Joint Boards of Directors
"...� The Executive Committee recommends that the Ad Hoc Committee be authorized to solicit, negotiate,
award and Issue purchase orders for Modifications to the Existing Interior Office Spaces in the
Administration Building for the General Management,Administration and Communication Offices,
Specification No. E-256, in an amended amount not to exceed $130,ODD.00.
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
AGENDA FOR
JULY 26, 1995
Item (12)(b)(5): FAHR95-31: Consideration of Motion to Adopt
Investment Performance Review Guidelines for the
Districts' Investment Program
Summarv:
On May 24,1995,the Board of Directors approved the Investment Program Policy Statement
recommended by the Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee.
On June 28, 1995,the Board of Directors selected Pacific Investment Management Company(PIMCO)as
External Money Manager,and Mellon Trust/Boston Safe Deposit 8 Trust Company(Mellon) as Custodial
Bank,as recommended by the FAHR Committee.
This agenda item presents recommendations for the ongoing monitoring, review,and reporting of
investment program performance to the FAHR Committee and the Boards of Directors.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee approve the
following actions:
1. Adoptthe investment performance benchmarks for the Liquid Operating Monies fund and
forthe Long-Term Operating Fund as described in the attached staff report.
2. Adopt the contents and frequency of investment performance reports as described in the
attached staff report.
FAHR Recommendation to the Executive Committee
That the Executive Committee recommend approval of the following actions:
1. Adopt the Investment performance benchmarks for the Liquid Operating Monies fund and
for the Long-Term Operating Fund as described in the attached staff report.
2. Adopt the contents and frequency of investment performance reports as described in the
attached staff report.
Executive Committee Recommendation to the Joint Boards of Directors
The Executive Committee concurs with the FAHR recommendation.
J\WPWQBSUGBSUr-13fl5
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
N of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
July 12, 1995 108XX EWS AVENGE
00 BOX 0127
FOUNTAIN"My.CALIXORMA 82728.W7
01AI982-EAll
STAFF REPORT
FAHR95-31 Consideration of Performance Review Guidelines
For the Districts' Investment Program
Backaround
On May 24, 1995, the Boards of Directors approved the Investment Program Policy
Statement recommended by the Finance, Administration & Human Resources
Committee (the "Committee").
On June 28, 1995, the Boards of Directors selected Pacific Investment Management
Company (PIMCO) as External Money Manager, and Mellon Trust/Boston Safe Deposit
& Trust Company (Mellon) as Custodial Services Bank, and authorized staff to negotiate
professional service agreements, as recommended by the Committee.
The Districts' Investment Policy designates the Committee as the oversight committee
for the Districts' Investment Policy and Program, and states that the Committee shall
adopt guidelines for the ongoing review of duration, quality, and liquidity of the Districts'
portfolio. Also, the Committee shall review the Districts' Investment Policy on an annual
basis, and recommend revisions to the Boards of Directors, as appropriate.
Monitorina & Review Program
Active monitoring and periodic reporting are essential to an effective, ongoing review
process for the Districts' Investment Program. The agreements with the Money
Manager, PIMCO, and the Custodial Bank, Mellon Trust, will require each firm to submit
periodic reports to the Districts that will track individual investment transactions, as well
as overall portfolio performance. The value of the Districts' portfolios will be marked to
market each month.
In addition, the Districts' Investment Advisor, Callan Associates, will measure the
performance of the portfolios and the Money Manager against recommended
benchmarks and report their findings to the Districts each quarter. The Districts' Money
Manager, PIMCO, and Investment Advisor, Callan, will both meet with the Committee
each quarter to review investment performance, proposed strategies, and compliance
with the Investment Policy (Section 14.2). Districts' staff will coordinate these efforts
and will provide additional monitoring and analysis using the Bloomberg financial
information system.
FAHR95-31
Page 2
July 12, 1995 lam/
Performance Benchmarks and Obiectives
The overall investment objective described in the Districts' Investment Policy is to obtain
a rate of return throughout budgetary and economic cycles, commensurate with
investment risk constraints and cash flow needs (Section 13.0). The cash flow needs
will be based on a five-year cash flow forecast, which will be updated quarterly, as
required by the Investment Policy (Section 7.1).
To ensure that the Districts' investment objectives are being met on an ongoing basis,
the performance of the portfolio, and that of the Investment Manager, will be measured
each quarter. The Districts' Investment Advisor recommends that the benchmarks
described below be used to measure the investment performance of the Liquid
Operating Monies Fund and the Long-Term Operating Monies Fund in achieving the
objectives of the Investment Policy.
Callan Associates recommends the use of two benchmarks for each portfolio. The first
is a Market Index Benchmark which reflects the rate-of-return for investments with
similar maturities. The second is a Peer Group Benchmark which reflects the returns
achieved by other active money managers with similar objectives. The attached Callan
report (Attachment "A") presents their analysis and rationale for the benchmark
recommendations. The benchmarks are summarized as follows: �✓
Liquid Operating Monies
o The 3-month T-bill rate will be the Market Index Benchmark for the short-term
operating fund.
o The Callan Active Cash Fixed-Income Style Group will be the Peer Group
Benchmark for the short-term operating fund.
Long-Term Operating Monies
o The Merrill Lynch Government and Corporate 1 to 5-year Maturity Index will
be the Market Index Benchmark for the long-term fund.
o The Callan Defensive Fixed-Income Style Group will be the Peer Group
Benchmark for the long-term fund.
Ongoing Reporting
The basic requirements for monthly reports about the Investment Program to the
Committee are described in Investment Policy (Section 14.0). These reports, together
with quarterly reports and the annual review, will provide the Committee with the
information needed to evaluate risk, duration, quality, and liquidity characteristics of the
Districts' Investment Program.
v FAHR95-31
Page 3
`..' July 12, 1995
The attached matrix (Attachment "B") presents a reference list to the recommended
contents of the monthly and quarterly reports that will be submitted to the Committee
and to the Boards of Directors.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee
approve the following actions:
1. Adopt the investment performance benchmarks for the Liquid
Operating Monies fund and for the Long-Term Operating Fund as
described in this report.
2. Adopt the contents and frequency of investment performance reports
as described in this report.
SKIc
J1WPOOC'FlN`GMNE1'PC.MTG�PCB"l.T/FFRPr.FPC�AHR85.J1
Attachments
JUL 05 '95 15;06 FR CRLLRN ASSOCIATES 30?. E32 I3230 TO SHNIT DIST-OR CT P.02
FAHR95-31 ATTACHMENT A
V
CALLAN ASSOCIATES INC RImiANN C MOOMY
,�(�/C•II I San Frcnnxo, Nev,York. Cnicaga A110Mo, Denver Vice Pt"cloM
July 5, 1995
Mr.Steve Kozak
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County
1OW Ellis Avenue
P.O.Box 8127
Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127
Dear Steve,
SUBJECT: Guidelines for the Performance Review of the Districts'Investment Program
The purpose of my letter is to establish the benchmarks to use in evaluating the returns achieved
by the investment manager. The recommended guidelines and benchmarks are provided in
Attachment I. If the Board approves the recommendations, the Attachment is in a format suitable
for handing off to the investment manager. This letter provides additional background
d./ information and rationale for the recommendations.
Benchmarks
The performance evaluation of the investment manager will be based on the total returns earned
on the fund, and by the degree of risk undertaken to achieve those returns. By total return we
mean the return from income earned,realized gains or losses,and the change in unrealized gain or
loss,based on market values. The need to account for unrealized gains or losses makes it
necessary to mark-to-market the portfolio. Once the return has been calculated,it should be
compared to a relevant benchmark. Given the short term volatility of financial markets,the
pattern of returns earned on the fund is likely to be volatile. Thus, an absolute return expectation
is not very useful for evaluating performance. Instead,an investment manager should be
evaluated relative to returns in the financial markets over the relevant time period.
In our view,each investment manager should be compared to at least two benchmarks: a market
index and a peer group. The market index represents the universe of, securities that the manager
could buy—it reflects the rentm available from a passive approach of holding all eligible
securities.The peer group reflects the returns achieved by other active managers with similar
objectives,operating in the same marketplace. Calian Associates has developed appropriate peer
groups,referred to as Style Croups,through extensive research and the development of a
comprehensive database.
550 East 91h Avern10 DeNMr CC'RVD? •.Y`.°.'of^.VI e .e-..are 1 ea- 11+1
JUL 05 '95 15:07 FR CALLAN ASSOCIATES 303 632 B230 TO SRNIT DIST-OR CT P.03
W
Mr. Steve Kozak `�►'
Page 2
July 5, 1995
An example of a market index is the Merrill Lynch Government&Corporate I to 5 Year
Maturity Index. Since this index is a broad measure of the government and corporate fixed
income securities with maturities from one to five years,it represents the universe of securities
available to your investment manager.An example of a peer group is the Callan Defensive Fixed-
Income Style Group. This style group most closely represents a peer group of active managers .
that generate risk and return results comparable to that of the Merrill Lynch I to 3 Year Treasury
Index, which is slightly shorter in duration than the I to 5 Year Maturity Index.
The specific benchmarks proposed for the Districts' two funds are:
Jrpuid Operating Monies
The short-term operating fund will be compared to the 3-month T-bill rare and the
Callan Active Cash Fued-Income Style Group. The Callan Active Cash Fixed
Income Style Group represents a peer group of managers who operate with a
maximum maturity of one year.
Long Term QM=g Monks
The long-term operating fund will be compared to the Merrill Lynch
Government&Corporate I to 5 Year Maturity Index and to the Callan
Defensive Fixed-Income Style Group.
Blsk
The investment manager chosen by the Committee is expected to add value through modest
duration shifts,sector selection and individual security selection. It would be inapprog.iate for
the manager to seek higher returns by subjecting the funds to higher risks. Therefore, the risk
associated with each fund, as measured by the variability of quarterly returns (standard deviation),
will also be monitored. The standard deviation of returns for each fimd should not exceed that of
the benchmark index and the peer group by more than 20 percent.
` JUL 05 'gs i5:e7 FR CALLAN ASSOCIATES 303 632 8230 TO SANIT DIST-OR CT P.04
v
�..� Mr. Steve Kozak
Page 3
July 5, 1995
Over the Longer Term
The focus of the Committee will be on achieving long term objectives. It is our observation that
fiduciaries who keep a focus on the long term objectives achieve a higher degree of success in
their investment programs. Quarterly performance will be evaluated for evidence of progress
toward the attainment of long-term targets. It is understood that there may be short-term periods
during which performance deviates from market indices. Over trailing three year and longer
periods, each fund is expected to perform in the upper 50 percentile of the manager's style group,
and to exceed the benchmark index with appropriate risk
Dst[ation
A rule-of-thumb for estimating the duration of a fixed income security of less than one year
maturity is to equate the duration to the maturity. For example,a 90 day Treasury bill has a
duration of 90 days (0.25), and a one year Treasury has a duration slightly less than 1. Thus,the
4/ maximum duration of 90 days specified for the Liquid Operating account in section 7.2.1.2. is
fairly conservative,and is equivalent to a weighted average maturity of 90 days. The account
could still hold a security with a one year maturity,but the account would need to counter the
effect of the one year security by shortening the remainder of the portfolio. If the Districts also
maintain some operating cash,the duration of the Liquid Operating account could be extended to
6 months,which is still conservative but would add a bit of additional return.
The duration target of the Long Term Operating Monies account should be set equal to that of
the benchmark.The duration of the Merrill Lynch Government&Corporate 1 to 5 Year Index is
approximately 2.5. The duration changes slightly as interest rates change,and has varied from
2.43 to 2.53 over the last three years. The investment guidelines would permit the manager to
vary duration by plus or minus 20 percent from that of the benchmark, which results in a range of
2.0 to 3.0. This guideline appears consistent with the amount of risk that the Districts are willing
to assume,while still providing the manager with a useful tool for adding value.
Yours truly,
Ru C.Moom�>
Vice President
\,,,/ attachment
FAHR95�31 ATTACHMENT "B"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING
FOR THE
DISTRICTS' INVESTMENT PROGRAM
POLICY
REFERENCE PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTIC REPORTING PARTY"
PIMCO MELLON CALLAN
14.1.1 Cost and market value of the portfolio(monthly mark-to-market). M,Q M,Q Q
14A.2 Modred duration of the portfolio compared to benchmark. M,Q Q
14.1.3 Dollar change in value of the portfolio for a 1%change In Interest rate. M,Q Q
14.1.4 Percent of portfolio invested In reverse repurchase agreements,and a schedule which matches the
maturity of such reverse repurchase agreements with the cash flows which are available to repay
them at maturity. M.Q Q
14.1.5 For the Liquid Operating Monies account only,the percent of portfolio maturing within 90 days. M,Q M,Q Q
14.1.6 Average portfolio credit quality. M,Q M, Q Q
14.1.7 Percent of portfolio with credit ralings below A'by any rating agency,and a description of such
securities. M,Q M,O Q
14.1.8 Listing of any transactions or holdings which do not complywilh this policy or with the California
Government Code. M,Q Q
14.1.9 Time-weighted total rate of return for the portfolio for the prior three months,twelve months,year-
to-date,and since Inception compared to the benchmark returns for the same periods. M,Q Q
ADDL" Comparison of portfolio performance to market Index benchmark. M,Q Q
ADDL" Comparison of Manager's performance to peer group benchmark. Q
ADDL" Monitoring of organizational and structural changes of Investment management firm. Q
ADDL" Audit portfolios for compliance with Investment policy guidelines. Q
Notes
'M= Monthly
Q = Quarterly
ADDL=Monitoring of Additional Performance Characteristics
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
AGENDAFOR
JULY 26, 1995
Item (12)(b)(6): FAHR95-32: Consideration of Proposed Changes to the IRS-
Approved Section 457 Deferred Compensation Plan as
follows:
(a) Consideration of Resolution No. 95.80 Approving First Amendment to Deferred
Compensation Plan for Officers and Employees in Order to Permit Greater
Flexibility in Plan Distribution Elections, Clarify Certain Provisions of the Plan, and
Comply with Certain Recent Internal Revenue Service Interpretations.
(b) Consideration of Resolution No. 95-81 Approving Amended Deferred
Compensation Program for Executive Management, Management, Professional
and Supervisory Employees.
Summary
The Committee is being asked to consider two Resolutions. The first is to adopt an Amendment
to the Plan in order to permit greater flexibility in plan distribution elections, clarify certain plan
�✓ provisions and comply with certain IRS interpretations; the second is to approve an Amendment
to the Deferred Compensation Program for District employees by revising job classification titles
for eligible participants.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Finance, Administration and Human Resources (FAHR) Committee
recommend approval of(a) the First Amendment to the CSDOC Deferred Compensation Plan
and; (b)Amendment to the Districts' Deferred Compensation Program by revising the job titles
of certain eligible employee classes.
FAHR Committee Recommendation to the Executive Committee
That the Executive Committee recommend approval of(a) the First Amendment to the CSDOC
Deferred Compensation Plan and; (b)Amendment to the Districts' Deferred Compensation
Program by revising the job titles of certain eligible employee classes.
Executive Committee Recommendation to the Joint Boards of Directors
The Executive Committee concurs with the recommendation of the FAHR Committee.
J:1 W PpS.1BS�AG85N]1'188.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
0 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
July 12, 1995 1O E.S AVENUE
Revised °O 2°A 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIOOXNIA 927284127
STAFF REPORT
FAHR95-32 Consideration of Proposed Changes to the Districts' IRS-
Approved Section 457 Deferred Compensation Plan as follows:
(a) Consideration of Resolution No. 95-_Approving First
Amendment to Deferred Compensation Plan for Officers
and Employees in Order to Permit Greater Flexibility in Plan
Distribution Elections, Clarify Certain Provisions of the
Plan, and Comply with Certain Recent Internal Revenue
Service Interpretations.
(b) Consideration of Resolution No. 95-_ Approving Amended
Deferred Compensation Program for Executive
Management, Management, Professional and Supervisory
Employees.
In 1975, the Districts adopted our first Deferred Compensation Plan for the benefit of
management employees. During the intervening twenty years, there have been four
amendments to the Plan, principally to comply with changes in the Internal Revenue
Service regulations, but also to expand the Plan to allow participation by all other
employees and by the Directors.
The Committee is being asked to consider two Resolutions. The first is to adopt an
Amendment to the Plan in order to permit greater flexibility in Plan distribution elections,
to clarify certain provisions of the Plan, and to comply with certain recent Internal
Revenue Service interpretations. There is no added cost to the Districts by approval of
this action.
The IRS has issued certain opinions regarding (1) the ability of Section 457 Plan
participants to delay making a decision on the desired form of benefits until shortly
before benefit payments are to begin, and (2) the requirement that combination benefits
(lump-sum plus distributions over time) cannot be paid in increasing amounts, with the
result that any lump sum must be paid on the same date as the first distribution over
time is made. Also, general counsel has suggested revising the plan-to-plan transfer
provisions to make clear that transfers can be made either to or from another
employer's Section 457 plan.
y The second Resolution amends the Districts Deferred Compensation Program and is
"housekeeping" in substance. The Resolution 1) clarifies job title classifications among
the four groups (Executive Management, Management, Professional and Supervisory)
that are eligible to receive this employment benefit. Several job classifications have had
title changes since the last amendment to the Program Resolution. This amendment
also adds the positions of Assistant General Managers and Director of Information
Technology to the Executive Management Group and the positions of Human
Resources Assistant (2), Executive Assistant II (2) and Executive Assistant 1 (7) to the
Management Group.
Each of these job classes has been separately and previously approved by action of the
Joint Boards and this Resolution is to bring those personnel actions into concurrence wit
the Deferred Compensation Program.
The added costs for this Program have been previously reviewed and approved by the
Boards.
Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee
recommend approval of (a) the First Amendment to the CSDOC Deferred
Compensation Plan and; (b) modifications to the Deferred Compensation Programs.
GGS:lc
J:IWPOGCIFlNL E�.WG�TAFFRPTFP TMR85.328 ` /
RESOLUTION NO. 95-80
APPROVING AMENDMENT TO DEFERRED COMPENSATION
PLAN FOR OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13,
AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
FIRST AMENDMENT TO DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
FOR THE OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES OF THE DISTRICTS
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 94-39, adopted by the Boards of Directors on April 13,
1994, the Districts approved and adopted the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,
California Deferred Compensation Plan as Amended 1994 (hereinafter referred to as the
"Plan"); and,
WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors desire to amend the Plan to permit greater flexibility
in plan distribution elections, to clarify certain provisions of the Plan, and to comply with certain
recent Internal Revenue Service interpretations.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7, 11, 13, and 14 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California
Deferred Compensation Plan as Amended 1994 is hereby amended as set forth in Exhibit "A,"
attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as though set forth herein at length, and
as so amended shall remain in effect until further amended or terminated by Resolution of the
Boards of Directors.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held , 1995.
2000.90919
1<9<3 1
FIRST AMENDMENT TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN AS AMENDED 1994
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 94-39, adopted by the Boards of Directors on
April 13, 1994, the Districts approved and adopted a revised deferred compensation
plan, i.e., the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California Deferred
Compensation Plan as Amended 1994 (the "Plan");
WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors desire to amend the Plan to permit greater
flexibility in plan distribution elections and to clarify certain provisions of the Plan;
THEREFORE, pursuant to Resolution No. 95- , adopted by the Boards of
Directors on , 1995 the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County;
California do hereby amend the Plan as follows:
1. Section 3.16 of the Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and the following
language is hereby inserted in its place and stead:
"'Required Beginning Date' shall mean the latest date that distributions are
permitted to commence under Section 10.3."
2. Section 10.1 of the Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and the following
language is hereby inserted in its place and stead:
1110.1 Termination of Employment by Retirement. The Participant is eligible to
receive distributions of benefits, with respect to retirement, after the
Participant has met the requirements for Normal Retirement and has
retired from service with the Employer. The Participant may submit to the
Employer an application for distribution of benefits under the Plan as early
as the date he notifies the Employer of his intended retirement and as late
as thirty (30) days following the actual date of termination of employment
due to retirement. Pursuant to such application, the Participant shall elect
one of the benefits payment options described below. Such election shall
become irrevocable upon the lapse of the thirtieth (30th) day following
termination of employment with the Employer due to retirement.
Fallowing the Participant's termination of employment due to retirement
and the receipt of such application, the Employer shall pay to the
Participant one of the following benefits (expressed in terms of both
payment option and commencement date) as elected by the Participant:
PAYMENT OPTION -
(a) Consecutive equal monthly payments over a period of 36
. 1
EXHIBIT "A"
months to 180 months, as determined by the Participant;
provided, however, that any such period may not extend
beyond the life expectancy of the Participant or the joint life
and last survivor expectancy of the Participant and the
Participant's Category A Beneficiary. (This payment option
may be satisfied through annuity distributions.)
(b) Consecutive equal monthly payments for the life of the
Participant or for the lives of the Participant and his Category
A Beneficiary. (This payment option may be satisfied
through annuity distributions.)
(c) A single payment equal to the balance of the Participant's
Investment Account.
(d) A single lump-sum payment in an amount to be determined
by the Participant, with the remainder of the Participant's
Investment Account to be paid under either payment option
(a) or payment option (b) above.
COMMENCEMENT DATE OPTION -
(a) The first day of the third calendar month following the month
in which termination of employment occurs, or
(b) The first day of a later month as designated by the
Participant.
In the case of payment option (d) above, the lump sum must be
paid on the same date that the first payment over time is paid.
DELAYED PAYMENT ELECTION OPTION
The irrevocable election which must be submitted to the Employer
no later than thirty (30) days following termination of employment
with the Employer due to retirement may specify the elected
commencement date option only, deferring the election as to the
particular payment option. In such case, the Participant must later
submit an election as to the payment option. Such later election
must be submitted no later than thirty (30) days before the
previously elected commencement date and shall become
irrevocable on the date thirty (30) days before such previously
elected commencement date. Should the Participant fail to timely
submit a separate payment option election hereunder, the
208690019 2
Employer shall pay the sum in the Participant's Investment Account
to the Participant according to payment option (c) above, on the
previously elected commencement date.
The foregoing options are limited by, and these payments shall be made
subject to, the provisions of Sections 10.3, 10.5, 10.6 and 10.7 hereof.
The total amount of any benefits paid pursuant to payment options (a)
through (d) above shall not exceed the sum of the amounts deferred by
the Participant, as adjusted for any earnings or losses thereon.
Should the Participant fail to elect one of the benefits hereunder by way of
an application for retirement benefits filed with the Employer within thirty
(30) days after retirement, the Employer shall pay the sum in the
Participant's Investment Account according to the "Benefit A" election
previously made pursuant to either the Participation Agreement or a
modification thereof. However, if there is no such previous election, then
the Employer shall pay the sum in the Participant's Investment Account
according to payment option (c) above on the Required Beginning Date."
3. Subsection 10.6.2 of the Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and the following
language is hereby inserted in its place and stead:
"10.6.2 When Participant Dies either before the Required Beginning Date
or before Distributions Have Begun. If a Participant dies either
before the Required Beginning Date or before distribution of his
Investment Account has begun, and, if any portion of the
Investment Account is payable to (or for the benefit of) a Category
A or B Beneficiary, then the Employer shall pay such portion as
follows -
CATEGORY A BENEFICIARIES
(1) if the Category A Beneficiary is other than the
surviving spouse, the portion of the Investment Account
payable to such beneficiary shall be distributed according to
one of the following options:
(a) Consecutive equal monthly payments over a
period of 36 months to 60 months (but not
exceeding the life expectancy of the Category
A Beneficiary);
(b) A single lump-sum payment; or
moo 19
14631 1 3
(c) A single lump-sum payment in an amount to be
`..✓ determined by the Participant, with the
remainder of the Participant's Investment
Account to be paid under payment option (a).
Such distributions shall begin on the date designated
by either the Participant or, if permitted by the
Participant, the Category A Beneficiary, but in no
event later than December 31 of the calendar year
immediately following the calendar year in which the
Participant dies. If payment is made under payment
option (c) above, the lump sum must be paid on the
same date that the first payment over time is paid.
(2) if the Category A Beneficiary is the surviving spouse of
the Participant, the portion of the Investment Account
payable to the surviving spouse shall be distributed
according to one of the following options:
(a) Consecutive equal monthly payments over a
period not to extend beyond the life expectancy
of the surviving spouse;
(b) A single lump-sum payment; or
(c) A single lump-sum payment in an amount to be
determined by the Participant, with the
remainder of the Participant's Investment
Account to be paid under payment option (a).
Such distributions shall begin on the date designated
by either the Participant or, if permitted by the
Participant, the surviving spouse, but in no event later
than the later of(i) December 31 of the calendar year
immediately following the calendar year in which the
Participant dies, and (it) December 31 of the calendar
year in which the Participant would have attained age
70'h. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, if as of
the date of the Participant's death, both the surviving
spouse and another are Category A Beneficiaries,
then distributions shall begin on or before December
31 of the calendar year immediately following the
calendar year in which the Participant dies. If
payment is made under payment option (c) above, the
x000000re 4
\�,/ 148311
lump sum must be paid on the same date that the first
payment over time is paid.
CATEGORY B BENEFICIARIES
(3) if the beneficiary is a Category B Beneficiary, which is a
validly existing legal entity (such as a charitable foundation
or the estate of the Participant), the portion of the Investment
Account payable to such beneficiary shall be distributed as a
lump sum on the first day of the third calendar month
following the month in which the death of the Participant
occurs.
All elections (as to both payment option and commencement date)_
to be made under this Subsection 10.6.2(1)(2) shall be made by the
Participant pursuant to either the "Benefit C" provisions of the
Participation Agreement or a later written election delivered to the
Employer before the death of the Participant. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, however, the Participant, in the Participation Agreement
or such later written election, may specify that, following the death
of the Participant, the Category A Beneficiary may elect, subject to
the foregoing limitations, the form of payments and the
commencement date of distributions. Any such beneficiary
election, however, must be in the form of an irrevocable written
election filed with the Employer no later than ninety (90) days
following the date of death of the Participant. In the absence of any
such timely election, the portion of the Investment Account payable
to such Category A Beneficiary shall be distributed to him in a lump
sum on the first day of the fifth calendar month following the month
in which the death of the Participant occurs.
If a Category A Beneficiary dies within six months of the date of the
Participant's death and before the entire portion of the Investment
Account allocated to him has been paid pursuant to this Subsection
10.6.2, then the remainder of such portion shall be paid to the
contingent beneficiary, if any, designated by the Participant in either
the Participation Agreement or a later written election delivered to
the Employer before the Participant's death. If there is no such
contingent beneficiary, or if the Category A Beneficiary dies more
than six months after the date of the Participant's death and before
the entire portion of the Investment Account allocated to him has
been paid pursuant to this Subsection 10.6.2, then the remainder of
such portion shall be paid to the estate of the deceased Category A
Beneficiary. Any payment under this paragraph shall be made in a
zW0-00019
IM31 1 5
lump sum on the first day of the third calendar month following the
month in which the death of the Category A Beneficiary occurs.
The Participant may designate a trust as his beneficiary under the
Plan. However, in that case, any beneficiary of the trust, who is
eligible to receive trust distributions on account of payments from
the Plan, shall be deemed to be a Category A Beneficiary under the
Plan. (For example, if the Participant designates as his beneficiary
a trust of which his surviving spouse is the life beneficiary, and
elects lifetime payments under option (2)(a) above, then for the
purpose of this Subsection 10.6.2, the surviving spouse shall be
deemed to be the Category A Beneficiary, and the terms of this
subsection shall be applied by basing distributions on the life
expectancy of the surviving spouse.) Notwithstanding the
foregoing, however, a trust may only be designated as a beneficiary
(and the beneficiary of the trust will only be deemed to be a
Category A Beneficiary) if, as of the later of the date that the
Participant submits to the Employer the election in which the trust is
named as a beneficiary or the Required Beginning Date, and as of
all subsequent periods during which the trust is named as a
beneficiary of the Plan, all of the following conditions are met: (1)
the trust is a valid trust under state law, (2) the trust is irrevocable,
(3)the beneficiaries of the trust can be identified from the trust
instrument, and (4) a copy of the trust instrument has been
provided to the Employer."
4. Section 12 of the Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and the following language
is hereby inserted in its place and stead:
"SECTION 12: Assignments and Transfers.
12.1. Consistent with Section 8 above, no one, including the Participant, his
beneficiary or designee, or any other person, shall have any right to
commute, sell, assign, transfer, or otherwise convey the right to receive
any payments hereunder, which payments and right thereto are expressly
declared to be non-assignable and non-transferable. The Employer shall
have no liability to either the Participant or a purported assignee or
transferee, on account of any attempted assignment or transfer. In
addition, except to the extent otherwise provided by law, no interest of the
Participant in the Plan shall be subject to attachment, garnishment or
execution, or be transferrable by operation of law, whether due to
bankruptcy, insolvency, liquidation for the benefit of creditors, or any other
cause.
2000-00019 6
1a 1_1
12.2 Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, the amounts deferred by a former
Participant may be transferred to another Internal Revenue Code section
457 eligible deferred compensation plan of which the former Participant
has become a participant, if the following conditions are met:
(1) the plan to which the former Participant wishes to transfer
amounts deferred is located within the State of California;
(2) the plan receiving such amounts provides for the acceptance
of such amounts;
(3) the employer accepting the transfer funds gives written
notice of its agreement to accept such transfer and assumes
liability therefor; and
(4) the Participant provides a written release to the Employer
releasing the Employer from any claim or liability under the
Plan after the date such transfer of funds occurs.
If a Participant separates from service in order to accept employment with
another entity which permits the Participant to participate in a section 457
eligible deferred compensation plan, and if the four conditions enumerated
above are met, payout of benefits will not commence upon separation
from service, notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, and
amounts previously deferred will automatically be transferred to that other �.
entity's section 457 eligible deferred compensation plan, to be credited to
the Participant's account.
12.3 A Participant, who was formerly employed by another public agency
located within the State of California, may transfer, to the Plan, funds from
an Internal Revenue Code section 457 eligible deferred compensation
plan maintained by that former employer, if that eligible deferred
compensation plan permits transfers to other section 457 eligible deferred
compensation plans and if the Participant complies with all applicable
terms and conditions of the transferring plan in effectuating the transfer."
5. The Plan shall continue in full force and effect except as expressly amended
herein.
]000. 19
148 1 1 7
RESOLUTION NO. 95-81
e. APPROVING AMENDED DEFERRED COMPENSATION
PROGRAM FOR EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT GROUP
EMPLOYEES AND MANAGEMENT, PROFESSIONAL AND
SUPERVISORY EMPLOYEES
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2. 3. 5. 6,
7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING REVISIONS TO THE DEFERRED
COMPENSATION PROGRAM FOR THE EXECUTIVE
MANAGEMENT GROUP EMPLOYEES (GENERAL
MANAGER, ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGERS AND
DEPARTMENT HEADS) AND MANAGEMENT,
PROFESSIONAL AND SUPERVISORY EMPLOYEES OF
THE DISTRICTS, AND REPEALING RESOLUTIONS NOS.
86-29 AND 87-113
WHEREAS, in conjunction with the Districts' Deferred Compensation Plan, the
Districts, by Resolution No. 86-29 and Resolution No. 87-113, adopted by the Boards of
e.. Directors on February 13, 1986 and August 8, 1987, respectively, have previously
approved specified Districts' contributions to the individual deferred compensation
accounts of the General Manager, Assistant General Managers and Department Heads
(collectively described as the "Executive Management Group"), and certain
Management, Professional and Supervisory employees of the Districts.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.
1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY DETERMINE, RESOLVE AND ORDER:
Section 1: Contributions.
A. General Manager and Assistant General Managers. That the
Districts hereby approve a contribution of Districts' funds in the annual sum equal to
V.d
$7,500.00 to the respective individual deferred compensation accounts of each of the
General Manager and the Assistant General Managers (the "Districts Non-Matching
Funds Contribution for General/Assistant General Managers").
B. Department Heads. That the Districts hereby approve a
contribution of Districts'funds to the respective individual deferred compensation
accounts of the Department Heads in an annual sum equal to a maximum of three (3%)
percent of the gross annual salary of each of the respective Department Heads (the
"Districts Matching Funds Contribution for Department Heads"), provided that each such
employee voluntarily withholds from his/her salary and contributes an equal sum to
his/her individual deferred compensation account.
That the Districts hereby approve an additional contribution (the
"Districts Non-Matching Funds Contribution for Department Heads") to the respective
individual deferred compensation accounts of the Department Heads, in an annual sum
equal to three (3%) percent of the gross annual salary of each of the respective
Department Heads, exclusive of the Districts Matching Funds Contribution for
Department Heads, as hereinabove described, without the requirement of any matching
contribution by the individual employees.
That in the event the total sum contributed to the individual deferred
compensation accounts of the Department Heads, comprised of the three (3%) percent
Districts Non-Matching Funds Contributions for Department Heads, the three (3%)
percent Districts Matching Funds Contributions for Department Heads, and the three
(3%) percent matching funds contributions from the employee, exceeds the maximum
]000.000/9
151�1 2 ` /
permissible dollar amount of deferred compensation, as prescribed by the Internal
Revenue Code or U.S. Treasury Department Regulations, the Districts shall continue to
provide three (3%) percent Districts Non-Matching Funds Contributions for Department
Heads and three (3%) percent Districts Matching Funds Contributions for Department
Heads to the extent that such total Districts' contributions do not exceed the maximum
allowed by law, and the individual employee shall only be required to contribute such
matching funds contributions as will provide a total of all contributions that will equal the
maximum allowed by law.
C. Management Professional and Supervisory Employees. That the
Districts hereby approve a contribution of Districts' funds in an annual sum equal to the
maximum of one (1%) percent of the gross annual salary of the respective
Management, Professional and Supervisory employees (collectively the "Districts
Matching Funds Contribution(s)for Management, Professional and Supervisory
Employees"), to the respective individual deferred compensation accounts of such
employees, provided each such employee voluntarily withholds from his/her salary and
contributes an equal sum to his/her individual deferred compensation account.
That the Districts hereby approve an additional contribution (the
"Districts Non-Matching Funds Contribution for Management, Professional and
Supervisory Employees") to the respective individual deferred compensation accounts
of the Management, Professional and Supervisory employees, in an annual sum equal
to two (2%) percent of the gross annual salary of each of the respective employees
described herein, exclusive of the Districts Matching Funds Contribution for
za 19 3
isr60L.1
Management, Professional and Supervisory Employees' amount hereinabove
described, without the requirement of any matching contribution by the individual ..✓
employees.
D. Vesting. That upon completion of three (3) years of employment
with the Districts and three (3) years of participation in the Deferred Compensation Plan,
all Districts Matching Funds Contributions then on deposit in the individual deferred
compensation accounts of the Department Heads, and Management, Professional and
Supervisory employees, and all Districts Non-Matching Funds Contributions then on
deposit in the individual deferred compensation accounts of the General Manager,
Assistant General Managers, Department Heads, and Management, Professional and
Supervisory employees shall be deemed vested, and thereafter, all Districts Matching
Funds and Non-Matching Funds Contributions deposited into the individual employee's
deferred compensation account shall be deemed vested upon deposit. Notwithstanding
the preceding sentence, however, upon the death, or upon the Normal or Late
Retirement (as those terms are defined in the Deferred Compensation Plan) of the
employee, irrespective of the length of his/her employment with the Districts, and of
his/her participation in the Deferred Compensation Plan, all Districts Matching Funds
and Non-Matching Funds Contributions then on deposit in the individual employee's
deferred compensation account shall be deemed vested. Once Districts Matching
Funds and Non-Matching Funds Contributions have vested as described in this
Subsection, they may thereafter be withdrawn to the extent otherwise permitted under
the Deferred Compensation Plan.
2000.00019 4
157W 1
Section 2: This program shall be for the benefit of the employees comprising
the Executive Management Group (General Manager, Assistant General Managers and
Department Heads) and Management, Professional and Supervisory employees. The
employment classifications of those employees are set forth on Attachment "V, which is
incorporated herein by reference, and shall be terminated only by action of the Boards
of Directors. In the event other classifications are added to the category of Executive
Management Group and Management, Professional and Supervisory employees by
action of the General Manager or Boards of Directors of Districts, said classifications
shall be deemed to be governed by this Resolution concurrently therewith.
Section 3: The General Manager and Director of Finance are hereby
authorized to execute individual Deferred Compensation Participation Agreements with
each eligible employee, and are further authorized to execute any and all documents
relating to investment and payment transactions relating to the Deferred Compensation
Plan, provided that such documents are approved as to form by the Districts' General.
Counsel.
Section 4: Resolutions Nos. 86-29 and 87-113 are hereby repealed, and the
provisions herein shall become effective upon adoption of this Resolution. The
provisions herein shall remain in effect until amended or terminated by Resolution of the
Boards of Directors.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held 1995.
IOOD00019 5
157M 1
ATTACHMENT "'I"
EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT GROUP
General Manager
Assistant General Manager-Administration
Assistant General Manager- Operations
Department Heads:
A. Director of Engineering
B. Director of Finance
C. Director of Human Resources
D. Director of Information Technology
E. Director of Maintenance
F. Director of Operations
G. Director of Technical Services
MANAGEMENT
Financial Manager
Controller
Accounting Manager
Purchasing Manager
Secretary To The Boards of Directors
Engineering Manager
Construction Manager
Lab Manager
Source Control Manager
Chief Operator
Maintenance Manager
Personnel Supervisor
Sr. Personnel Analyst
Safety & Emer. Resp. Manager
Senior Regulatory Specialist
Environmental Management Manager
Chief Scientist
Training Manager
Operations Manager
Human Resources Assistant
Executive Assistant II
Executive Assistant 1
3WPO 0
inW t 6
PROFESSIONAL
�.✓ Senior Accountant
Accountant
Principal Information Services Tech.
Information Services Analyst
Programmer Analyst
Programmer
Sr. Buyer
Buyer
Principal Administrative Assistant
Sr. Administrative Assistant
Engineer
Associate Engineer III
Associate Engineer II
Associate Engineer I
Principal Engineer Associate
Principal Env. Specialist
Project Specialist
Principal Lab & Res. Analyst
Scientist
Personnel Analyst
Safety & Emer. Resp. Specialist
Regulatory Specialist
.r Contract Administrator
Safety Representative
Senior Financial Analyst
Financial Analyst
Analyst
Senior Maintenance Planner
Planner
20060 * 7
�� 151fi0_1
SUPERVISORY !
Principal Accountant
Information Services Specialist
Software Specialist
Supervising Buyer
Warehouse Supervisor
Engineering Supervisor
Senior Engineer
Chief Const. Inspector
Supv. Const. Inspector
Compliance Supervisor
Lab Supervisor
Senior Scientist
Source Control Superv.
Supv. Source Ctrl. Insp.
Sr. Operations Supv.
Operations Supervisor
Training Supervisor
Field Supervisor
Foreman
Security Supervisor
Environmental Management Supvr.
Safety Supervisor
Principal Financial Analyst .J
mo la e
�i
..y
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
AGENDAFOR
JULY 26, 1995
Item (12)(b)(7): FAHR95-34: Consideration of Amendment No. 13 to
the Agreement for Employment of General Counsel,
incorporating increases in compensation in
accordance with proposal, effective August 1, 1995.
Summary
The General Counsel submitted the attached request for an increase in compensation
proposed to take effect on August 1, 1995. The last review by the Board was performed
in February 1992.
The firm of Rourke, Woodruff& Spradlin continues to provide excellent legal services
for the Districts, and there is no better wastewater agency legal counsel in the nation.
Mr. Woodruff has been active in both AMSA and CASA. He has served as chair of both
..✓ the AMSA and CASA attorneys' committess and is presently on the CASA Board of
Directors. Mr. Woodruff represents the Districts in a superior manner in legal matters
both inside and outside the agency. He has an excellent relationship with Districts' staff
and continues to exhibit enthusiasm and energy in his representation of our interests.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of Amendment No. 13 to the Agreement for Employment of
General Counsel, incorporating increases in compensation in accordance with Rourke,
Woodruff& Spradlin's proposal, effective August 1, 1995.
Executive Committee Recommendation
The Executive Committee recommends that Amendment No. 13 to the Agreement for
Employment of General Counsel, incorporating increases in compensation and future
annual increases equivalent to the Consumer Price Index but not to exceed 4%, in
accordance with Rourke, Woodruff& Spradlin's proposal, effective August 1, 1995.
JIWPWQ&4NGBB MMT
AMENDMENT NO. 13 RE AGREEMENT FOR
EMPLOYMENT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
dad
THIS AMENDMENT to that certain Agreement dated May 1, 1975, is made and
entered into this day of , 1995, by and between THOMAS L.
WOODRUFF, hereinafter referred to as "COUNSEL", who is an owner/member of the
Law Firm of Rourke, Woodruff& Spradlin, a Professional Corporation, hereinafter
referred to as "FIRM"; and COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, on behalf of itself and as agent for County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, hereinafter referred to as
"DISTRICT.
WHEREAS, the parties hereto have previously entered into an Agreement,
whereby DISTRICT employed COUNSEL to serve in the capacity as General Legal
4✓
Counsel to DISTRICT; and
WHEREAS, the parties hereto wish to amend said Agreement, as more
particularly set forth herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, it is agreed between the
parties hereto as follows:
1. Paragraph 4 of said Agreement is hereby amended to read:
"4. Compensation for legal services by COUNSEL shall be as follows:
(a) There shall be no minimum retainer paid to COUNSEL.
(b) For all work attendant to those services set forth in
Paragraph 3 above, DISTRICT shall pay FIRM at a rate of One Hundred
1
Eighty-Five ($185.00) Dollars per hour. For legal services rendered by
other Principals or Senior Associates of FIRM, DISTRICT shall pay to
FIRM at a rate of One Hundred Seventy-Five ($175.00) Dollars per hour.
For those services rendered by Associate Attorneys of COUNSEL, who
are members of COUNSEL'S FIRM, DISTRICT shall pay to FIRM at a rate
of One Hundred Fifty ($150.00) Dollars per hour. For those services
rendered by Paralegals of COUNSEL, who are employees of COUNSEL'S
FIRM, DISTRICT shall pay to FIRM at a rate of Eighty ($80.00) Dollars per
hour.
(c) Effective July 1 of each year, the hourly labor rates shall be
adjusted in an amount equal to the percentage increase in the Consumer
Price Index for the Los Angeles-Orange County Metropolitan Area, all
wage eamers, for the period between June 1 through May 30 of the prior ...
year. Each hourly labor rate shall be rounded to the nearest $1.00
increment. All of the rates listed shall include FIRM'S direct labor costs,
indirect costs, overhead and profit.
(d) For appearances by COUNSEL at conferences, symposiums
or seminars on behalf of DISTRICT, DISTRICT shall pay FIRM at the rate
of Four Hundred ($400.00) Dollars per day, or at the rate of One Hundred
Eighty-Five ($185.00) Dollars per hour, whichever is less.
(a) DISTRICT shall be responsible for and shall pay or
reimburse FIRM for all costs and expenditures required or advanced by
zoos 28
152531 2
COUNSEL or FIRM in the preparation for, prosecution or defense of
litigation, including court costs, jury fees, witness fees, reporters fees, title
reports, photographs, diagrams, maps and similarly-related items.
(f) DISTRICT shall be responsible for and shall pay or
reimburse COUNSEL or FIRM for the actual expenses of travel, food and
lodging outside the County of Orange on the business of DISTRICT, and
shall pay or reimburse COUNSEL or FIRM for all other necessary
expenditures on the business of DISTRICT in the actual amounts so
expended."
2. This Amendment shall take effect August 1, 1995.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be
executed on the day and year first above written.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, on behalf of itself and as agent for
County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14
of Orange County, California
By
Chairman, Board of Directors
By
Secretary, Board of Directors
ROURKE, WOODRUFF & SPRADLIN, P.C.
By
Thomas L. Woodruff
nw:a
200o-0002e 3
15253 1
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
AGENDA FOR
JULY 26, 1995
Item (12)(b)(8): EXEC95-01: Consideration of motion to receive and file
staff report regarding consolidation of the nine separate
districts; approving staff recommendation to
consolidate the nine separate districts into one single
sanitation district; with a single board of directors made
up of one representative each for every existing member city, sanitary district,
water district and unincorporated portion of the county within the sanitation
districts' service area and now represented on one or more of the existing nine
sanitation districts; direct staff to initiate all steps necessary, including the
LAFCO process, to complete a reorganization of the sanitation district as outlined
in this motion; and to report back to the Executive Committee at future meetings
regarding the progress toward consolidation.
Summary
Ord When the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County were originally incorporated in 1954,
they were organized into a number of separate districts that generally followed the drainage
patterns of the county. This approach followed the original concept developed by the Los
Angeles County Sanitation Districts in the 1920s. When the Sanitation Districts were new and
planning new interceptor sewers into the existing and newly developing areas of their service
areas, a localized approach made sense because sewer improvement bonds and the existing
agreements between neighboring cities narrowed the focus of concern at that time. Our job
then was to abate local sewer overloading, to extend sewer service to people on septic tanks
and to retire the small treatment plants serving individual communities in the northern and
central portions of Orange County.
Every few years the question of consolidation is raised by the Joint Boards of Directors. In the
interest of ease of administration, streamlining board procedures, maintaining the "books"and
reducing costs, consolidation makes sense. Today, this may be more true than ever before.
Our sewer system is well established. Todays focus is much more on the joint works facilities
and the various regulatory issues surrounding them. Today, the wastewater management
issues facing our service area are far more regional in nature than those early days when
localized population centers were surrounded by large areas of orange groves and bean fields.
Effective and coordinated governance is also an issue to consider. When the Joint Boards
meet and vote on policy and budgetary issues, they vote as nine separate public corporations.
We have been fortunate in the past that each of the nine Districts have generally voted in
unison. Recently, the selection of Option A for the Comprehensive Settlement Agreement was
approved 9-0 by the nine separate Districts. And the 1995-96 budget was approved by all nine
Districts.
But imagine the difficulties that would have been presented had there been a split in either of
` these two important votes. How would we have effectively resolved the legal or budgetary
differences that split votes would have implied?
`.
Al the Joint Boards meeting of January 11, 1995, the issue of consolidation was raised and staff
was directed to evaluate it and report to the Executive Committee. Staff reports were presented
in January, February and June outlining the major issues. The attached staff report
"consolidates' (sorry) these previous reports into a final comprehensive report and addresses
the major issues raised by consolidation.
There are major issues that consolidation raises: future user fees/property taxes, future
ownership of the Districts' facilties now individually held by nine Districts, comingling of existing
reserves and debts, and the make-up of the governing board. These are discussed and
answered in the attached staff report.
In summary, staff recommends that existing user fees and property taxes remain at their
existing levels; that all equity ownership in the collection system and joint treatment works revert
to a single district; that all existing reserves and debts comingle to the extent allowed by law and
existing debt covenants; and that the governing board consist of one representative each from
every city, sanitary district, water district and the unincorporated area of the county now having
representation on one or more of the existing nine districts.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Executive Committee consider a motion to receive and file the staff
report regarding consolidation of the nine separate districts; approve staff recommendation to
consolidate the nine separate districts into one single sanitation district; with a single board of
directors made up of one representative each for every city, sanitary district, water district and
unincorporated portion of the county within the sanitation districts' service area and now
represented on one or more of the existing nine sanitation districts; direct staff to initiate all
steps necessary, including the LAFCO process, to complete a reorganization of the sanitation
district as outlined in this motion; and to report back to the Executive Committee at future
meetings regarding the progress toward consolidation.
Executive Committee Recommendation to the Joint Boards of Directors
The Executive Committee recommends that the Joint Boards of Directors consider a motion to
receive and file staff report regarding consolidation of the nine separate districts; consideration
of a resolution approving staff recommendation to consolidate the nine separate districts into
one single sanitation district;with a single board of directors made up of one representative
each for every existing member city, sanitary district, water district and unincorporated portion of
the county within the sanitation districts' service area and now represented on one or more of
the existing nine sanitation districts; direct staff to initiate all steps necessary, including the
LAFCO process, to complete a reorganization of the sanitation district as outlined in this motion.
J.W PD.^.QBSV MG@D)-03e9
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
• M ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
July 14, 1995 Imes EwsnvENUE
Pa.eoz BTO
STAFF REPORT rouNUIN VALuY.MIFCRm eErEeaiE7
m41M-Mn
CONSOLIDATION OF THE Districts
Backaround
• The 1947 Formation Report recommended creation of Districts in accordance with the
Sanitation Districts Formation Act and based on geography, existing facilities, and to a
lesser extent, political boundaries.
• Each District originally financed its own trunk sewers and share of joint works facilities
capital and operating charges through the property tax levy. After Proposition 13, each
District received a share of basic levy based on previous percentages. Over the following
decade, user fees were imposed by each of the Districts to rover operating revenue
demands. District 13, formed after Proposition 13, receives no property taxes. District 14 is
funded by the IRWD.
• Over the years, many cost-sharing agreements have occurred between separate Districts
for construction and operation of collection facilities. Ownership "floats" between individual
Districts depending on actual flows and needs. The equity share of each district is adjusted
and rebooked (normally annually)to reflect its ownership interest in the collection facilities
and joint facilities that serve R.
• During 1981-82, the Grand Jury Commissioned Price Waterhouse to conduct a Study of
Potential Restructuring of Special Districts in Orange County.
• In 1982, the Grand Jury issued a report recommending that the Boards consolidate the
then seven sanitation Districts into one district with Board membership based on a smaller
group of elected representatives.
• In 1983, the Districts' Fiscal Policy and Reorganization Committees evaluated the Grand
Jury recommendations and submitted findings and recommendations to the Executive
Committee.
• In February 1983, the Executive Committee recommended that the Joint Boards adopt a
policy urging that each member agency limit their representation to one.
• In February 1983, Districts' General Counsel reported the following consolidation options:
1) Make no change in the District organization.
2) Consolidate the present seven Districts into one single District.
3) Consolidate the present seven Districts into three Districts.
4) Retain the present organization with no consolidation and urge each member to send
only one representative.
5) By Districts Resolution, limit the compensation payable per meeting to the equivalent
of one Director per agency.
Staff Report
July 14, 1995 �
Page 2
• In April 1983, the Joint Boards of Directors adopted Resolution No. 83-84 urging each of its
member agencies to have a single director represent the agency and approved in concept
the consolidation of Districts into one.
• In July 1983, the Joint Boards reviewed several organizational alternatives include:
1) Consolidation into one District with establishment of an appropriate number of zones
(co-terminus with existing District boundaries) for separate financing of specified O&M,
capital or debt retirement activities.
2) Consolidation into one District with no zones.
3) Consolidation into three "super-Districts", defined by recent engineering studies
(District 1, the northern half of District 6 and District 7; Districts 2, 3 and 11; and District
5 and southern half of District 6).
4) Retain the existing organization structure of the (then) seven separate Districts.
Several members expressed concern that Directors' responsibilities to their constituencies
would be impaired and local control would be lost by consolidation. If consolidation were to take
place, Committee members would favor the zone concept for financing certain activities. This
would reduce the then estimated $85,000 annual savings of consolidating.
The Joint Boards determined that the Districts'operations were functionally consolidated and no �..✓
significant overall benefit would accrue by reorganizing into a single District.
• In 1984 and 1985, Districts 13 and 14 were formed, adding new member agencies and
additional Directors.
• In 1994, membership of the Boards of Directors was reduced by most represented agencies
voluntarily limiting their representation to one individual. Huntington Beach and Newport
Beach, the only cities sitting on their respective Boards, still send two each to maintain three
seats on their Boards. The Board of Supervisors, which sit on all nine Boards, have two
representatives.
Discussion of Consolidation Issues (Assuming a Single Sanitation District)
Administration
• Simplified Board Secretary, recordkeeping, budget preparation and procurement
requirements.
• Districts' staff cost savings approximately$55,000.
Governance
• Consolidation is attractive because it streamlines procedural matters and reduces the cost
of governance.
• Consolidation eliminates the multiple vote status that some Directors now possess.
Staff Report
yi July 14, 1995
Page 3
• Existing problem of split votes is eliminated.
• Potential costs of a split vote that fractures the Districts over a significant policy or financing
issue can't be estimated.
Property Tax Revenues
• Would remain as is. Districts 13 and 14 do not receive property tax revenues. Other
Districts receive slightly different shares of basic levy, based on pre Proposition 13 rates.
Users all pay the same 1% basic levy.
• No fiscal impact.
User Fee Revenues
• Potential to level-out user fees throughout the entire service area, or to adjust them to
balance against variations in property taxes or to maintain them at existing levels until
subsequently adjusted by action of board.
• A potential loss in property taxes resulting from a "raid" by the stale or others would
necessitate an increase in any case in all Districts except 13 and 14.
• Potential increased revenue demands in the future will require increases in user fees.
Increases have been projected in the 2020 plan and the budget but no increase has been
adopted by the Boards for the last three years.
• Staff recommends that user fees remain as is at the present level for the time being. The
Board can evaluate changes in the future.
• Some Districts could experience user fee reductions/gains in the future if the board decided
to level rates. For example, District 13 now has $100 user fees and District 7 has$50.
Equalizing could occur over time by increasing the lower rates, dependent on property tax
availability.
Accountino
• No need for separate District accounting.
• No need for numerous accounting ledgers for shared trunk sewers or to adjust equity share
in joint facilities which are adjusted annually now based on last 36 months actual flow.
Independent auditor and Districts' staff cost savings would be approximately$67,000.
Contractual
• A consolidated District would assume previous Districts' contracts.
• Legal and administrative costs reduction would be limited.
Le a
• No inter-District agreements.
• Legal costs reduction of approximately$5,000.
• Attached is an Executive Report from Counsel on Institutional Alternative Available under
`✓ California Law for the Public Ownership and Operation of Wastewater Control Facilities.
Staff Report
July 14, 1995
Page 4
Regional Services
• Sewer services would be provided on a system-wide basis—no distinction for operational
costs by locality. This is now true in the larger Districts.
• Potential for higher cost localities to pay less than fair share and vice versa. However, this
is already true in the larger Districts.
• No"inter District" sewer use charges and/or revenues.
Cash and Reserves
• Cash and reserves levels of individual Districts would be commingled.
• Some Districts have accumulated more/less cash and reserves—same Districts would gain/
lose in total. Today the per capital reserves range from $18 to $937, depending upon the
District. The August reserve is $216 per capita.
Board Membership
• Discussions by the Board at previous meetings seem to lean toward maintaining
representation by each of the 26 public entities now represented on the boards with
appointment procedures remaining as they now are. This provides home rule on one hand
while addressing regional issues on the other.
• Board membership would decrease from 30 to 26 with the loss of double representation
from Huntington Beach, Newport Beach, Yorba Linda and the County.
• Board compensation costs would decrease approximately$10,000 per year.
Connection Fees
• Connection fees are now uniform agency-wide at$2350 per dwelling unit and could remain
that way.
• Connection fees must (and do) meet the"fair share"test of the Clean Water Act. Future
increases which are adopted by the board from time to time could remain uniform agency-
wide.
• No fiscal impact.
Lono-Term Debt
• The consolidated district would assume obligations of each district.
• Some Districts have incurred more/less debt than others. Some Districts would gain/lose
total liabilities.
• Finance Rating Agencies would no longer review Districts for the potential weak district and
could improve our overall credit rating.
• No need for Mutual Benefit Advances Agreement (the "step up" requirement that solvent
Districts bail out financially incapable Districts)—potential for rating upgrade with resultant
savings in interest or loan insurance. Trustee fees would drop by approximately$16,500.
Staff Report
July 14, 1995
Page 5
Engineerina
• Limited or no impact on engineering decisions.
• No fiscal impact.
Operations and Maintenance
• No change.
• No fiscal impact.
Class III Industrial Waste User Fees
• Class III industrial/commercial user fees range from $703 to $1,037 per million gallons
depending upon the District, averaging $933.
• Class III industrial/commercial annual user fees range from $162 to $62,655 per year. The
average annual fee is $3,415.
• Some users would experience increases/decreases in user fees, but the differential would
not be major.
• Class III industrialicommercial user fees would become a gal rate in the future—
approximately today's average $933 per million gallons.
District-Specific Services Cost Issues
• Each District has unique costs of operation. For instance:
♦ District 3 has a sulfide control program that utilizes chemicals with attendant added
costs.
♦ District 5 has pumping stations that add construction, operation and maintenance cost.
♦ District 7 has local collection system which we maintain.
• Each District has unique operating conditions within the District:
♦ Portions of Districts 2 and 3 adjacent to plant, portions 20 miles away.
♦ Portions of District 5 flow are pumped, balance is gravity flow.
♦ Portions of District 6 flow to Plant 1, balance to Plant 2.
Should We Consider Revenue Zones for the Consolidated District?
• Revenue zones are currently authorized under the Sanitation Districts Act.
• Revenue zones would permit the creation of varying revenue and expenditure zones
analogous to assessment Districts. Such zones could be drawn in any configuration in
accordance with revenue requirements.
Staff Report
July 14, 1995
Page 6
• Revenue zones would eliminate the accounting, legal/administrative and financing cost
savings advantages identified with consolidation (i.e. nine revenue zones would have costs
approximately equivalent to nine Districts).
• While there are some differences in the cost of operation from district to district , this is also
true within individual Districts, as pointed out above. Therefore the equity improvements
that revenue zones might imply would not address new inequities any more than they
address existing inequities.
• Many public services (i.e. fire, police, transportation, trash) are paid uniformly by the user
community, while the level of service actually provided to the user community is quite
variable, depending upon type of building, neighborhood, distance traveled or purchasing
habits.
• We do meet the fair-share test of the federal Clean Water Act today
• Staff recommends that revenue zones not be used.
Summary
Governance would be improved by having the governing body voting as a single unit instead of U
nine separate public corporations.
The net membership of the Boards would be reduced from the existing 30 to 26, with each
public entity now represented on the board maintaining its representation.
• The consolidation of the Districts could achieve a leveling of revenues and expenditures
among the nine separate Districts.
• The implications of this leveling have been depicted by District in the attached tables .
• Cost savings of up to$144,000 per year can be achieved from the various accounting,
legal/administrative and financial savings so far identified.
• Connection fees will not be affected by consolidation. _
• Total Class III industrial/commercial user fees will change insignificantly but fees for a
particular user may change up to 19% by consolidation.
• Revenue zones would reduce some or all cost savings since they would imply a new set of
legal/administrative and financing requirements.
• Existing Districts have differing operating costs compared to one another as reflected in the
'95/96 budget and illustrated in this report but that is true within each District as well.
Staff Report
July 14, 1995
Page 7
Recommendation
Staff recommends consideration of motion to receive and file staff report regarding
consolidation of the nine separate Districts; consideration of a resolution approving the
consolidation of the nine separate Districts into one single sanitation district; with a single board
of directors made up of one representative each for every city, sanitary district, water district and
unincorporated portion of the county within the Sanitation Districts' service area and now
represented on one or more of the existing nine Sanitation Districts; direct staff to initiate all
steps necessary, including the LAFCO process, to complete a reorganization of the Sanitation
District as outlined in this motion; and to report back to the Executive Committee at future
meetings regarding the progress toward consolidation.
BPA:jt
�awroocicMwesanrswr+sai.srt
�ae�
c
1994-95 BUDGETED FLOW
30,000
25,000
O1
2
O
J
J
20,000 .
Z
O
J
J
15,000 -
Z
3
0
LL 10,000
J
F
0
5,000
0 + +- ■
1 2 3 5 6 7 11 13 14
DISTRICT NUMBER
CONSOL7.XLC 7113195
COMPARISON OF 1994-95 OPERATING EXPENSES
60
z
0
50
w
a
c
w
w 40
z
z
6
30
C7
z
Q
w 20
0
a
Z 10
z
0 + + + t
1 2 3 5 6 7 11 13 14
DISTRICT NUMBER
■9 Districts OConsolideted
CONSOL6.XLC_7/13/95
COMPARISON OF SEWER SERVICE USER FEE PER PERSON
70
60
z
0
¢ 50
w
a
w
n 40
w
w
LL
w 30
z 20
z
a
10
1 2 3 5 6 7 11 13 14
DISTRICT NUMBER
■9 Districts OConsolidatad
CONSOL8.XLC_7/13/95
COMPARISON OF SECURED PROPERTY TAXES
45
40
Z 35
O
N
w 30
a
m 25
N
W
X
F 20 -
C]
W
j 15
U
w
y 10 -
5 -
1 2 3 5 6 7 11 13 14
DISTRICT NUMBER
[n9 Districts OConaolideted
CONSOL9.XLC_7/13/95
1 1
COMPARISON OF LONG TERM DEBT
500
450
z 400
0
w
350
a
w 300
a
w 250
0
2 200
0 150
z
0
100
50
0 - i - � -
1 2 3 5 6 7 11 13 14
DISTRICT NUMBER
■9 Districts OCnnsolideted
CONSOL5.XLC 7/13195
COMPARISON OF CLASS III INDUSTRIAL/COMM USER FEES
1200 -
y 1000
Z
O
Q
u 800
Z
O
J_
600
w
a
w
u 400
Q
z
2
Z
¢ 200
0 — r
1 2 3 5 6 7 11 13 14
DISTRICT NUMBER
■9 Districts OConsolidated
CONSOL4.XLCJ/13/95
( t �
COMPARISON OF TAXES PLUS USER FEES
100
90
Z
y 80
W
a 70
w
y 60
W
50
N
40
30
w
a 20
10
0
1 2 3 5 6 7 11 13 14
DISTRICT NUMBER
■9 Dlatricta OConaolidated
CONSOLII.XLC_7Fl3195
Property Taxes and SFR User Fee Per Person
70
60
50
`n
i 40
`w
n
30
6
20
10
0 a
1 2 3 5 6 7 11 13 14
District Number
■Tax Per Person ■Use Fee Per Person OConsolideted Avg Fee & Tex Per Person
7tl3195_CONSOLI0.XLC
COMPARISON OF JULY 1994 CASH RESERVES
11000
900
800
0 700
N
i 600
¢
a 500
y
w
> 400
N
� 300
200
100
0
1 2 3 5 8 7 11 13 14
DISTRICT NUMBER
09 Districts OConsolidated
CONSOL3.XLC_7/13/95
137-14-9t I I:IUM rxUM 8UU6A11, WVUUCUrr, Jrttx N eaZwao I uuu uo i
Executive Report
Institutional Alternative Available Under California Law
for the Public Ownership and Operation
of Wastewater Control Facilities
The Board has expressed interest in the procedures available for possible
consolidation of the nine county sanitation districts into one county sanitation district. The
Board has also expressed an Interest in what other alternatives exist under California law
for the public ownership and operation of wastewater control facilities.
This report provides an overview description of each of the institutional alternatives.
Information concerning the method of formation, governance, structure, powers, and
operating capabilities is provided. Examples of existing agencies formed under each of the
particular enabling ads are provided where applicable.
1. Sanitary District
The powers of a sanitary district are similar to the powers of the County Sanitation
District The formation of a district is initiated by petition of not less than 25 persons
living in the proposed district. The proposed district must be natural watershed
area. After the formation proceedings have been initiated, LAFCO must conduct a
notice of public hearing at which the commission might either approve, modify or
deny the proposed formation.
If approved, the proposed formation is sent to the County Board of Supervisors to
conduct an Authority hearing, at which the Board may either terminate further
proceedings or call for an election. If an election is proposed, a majority vote of the
qualified voters is required to create the district.
The Board of Directors of a sanitation district are elected at large. The governing
body would consist of a representative from each of the participating member
communities. Oro Loma Sanitation District, in the East Bay Area of San Francisco
is an example of a regional facility operating under this form of governance.
2. Sanitation and Flood Control Districts
Various organizations created by the legislature have innovated functions in the use
and control of water. There are several general legislative acts providing for districts
whose principal function Is the control of flood water and to provide for a complete
and comprehensive sewage disposal system. A sanitation and flood control district
Is an example of this type of dual purpose institution.
far/
-1-
117-14-9b I1: 111Aa ?KUM xuuxix, muuxurr, arxx lu socwoo ruuJiuui
The great majority of the flood control districts now functioning in the state were
organized by special acts. The special act legislation provides the institutional
participants with the opportunity to customize the powers, governance, ownership
and financing to meet the public service needs of their constituents. This legislative
approach provides considerable flexibility. An example of this is Vallejo Sanitation
and Flood Control District The Act gives Vallejo broad powers in the performance
in its duties.
3. Sewer and Sewer Maintenance Districts
A sewer and sewer maintenance district can be formed in any portion of the county,
whether incorporated or unincorporated, In which lateral or Collecting sewers have
been installed for the maintenance and repair of the sewer lines. The County Board
of Supervisors has the powers to form a dlatrict If the Board believes such action
would be in the best interests of county residents. The formation process begins
with the County Board of Supervisors determining, through resolution, that the
proposed area is in need of sewer maintenance and should be forted into a district.
The Board of Supervisors then calls for a noticed public hearing for public input. At
the conclusion of the hearing process, the Board can approve the formation of a
district entity.
Once formed,the governing body of the district Is the County Board of Supervisors.
The Board of Supervisors is responsible and has authority for all decisions related
to the district The governance process follows the structure and policies of the �=
existing county governance process.
The exisfing enabling ad for sewer and sewage maintenance districts only provides
powers to clean, repair, reconstruct, renew, replace, operate and maintain lateral
and connecting sewers. Financial powers are also limited through legislation.
Several sewer districts have sought corrective legislative action to allow for the
construction and operation of treatment plants and to give them broader financial
powers to issue dead instruments for capital facilities financing. An example of a
district formed of a sewer and sewer maintenance district with corrective legislative
action is Fairfield-Sulsun Sewer District in Norther California.
4. Water Districts
Water Districts may be formed under any of more than 30 general ads, in addition,
a large number have been created by special acts. The chief function of a district
Is to supply water for irrigation to land owners within its boundaries. A water district
is authorized to acquire and construct the necessary works for production and
distribution of water. In addition, several districts also have powers with respect to
sewage, fire protection, flood or storm water, and water reclamation.
ronocoma
U'f-14-lIh II:IUAM YGUI/ fuuaaa, wuuvaure, uraa ru JULUJJU
a. County Water Disid
The formation of a County Water district is instituted by petition and requires
signatures of at least 10% of the voters and 10% of the voters of each
municipal corporation Included within the territory of the proposed district. If
it is approved, It Is forwarded to the County Board of Supervisors. If the
Board of Supervisors determines that the proposed district is in the public
interest, it calls for an election on the next established election date. Upon
approval by a majority of the district's voters, proposed district and cities
included within the district, the district is formed.
The main distinctions between County Water Districts and County Sanitation
Districts include:
- Governing body: which is currently limited to a five member board,
and
- Service capabilities: County Water Districts can provide water
services which is not possible under the present County Sanitation
District Legislation.
San Marcos County Water District is an example of an operational Water
District within the State of California. San Marcos provides potable water,
sewerage service and reclaimed water to a portion of Northern San Diego
County.
b. California Water District
California Water Districts are formed by a complex petition process. The
holders of title to the majority of landholders that will benefit from the
proposed water services must sign a petition document to initiate the
formation process. The petition, once completed, is then forwarded to
LAFCO for review and final approval.
A California Water District has essentially the same powers as county water
districts, including the power to treat and dispose of sewage and waste or
storm water. Moulton Niguel Water District in Orange County was formed as
a California Water District and represents an example of this type of Water
District.
5. Community Services District
There are some 278 community service districts In the state providing a broad base
of services ranging from library construction and operation, to the collection,
treatment, or disposal of sewage, waste or stone water.
Yaooao U
'sow i -3-
U1-14'99 11:111M reum 6eU3116, nuuuwrr, oun lu au'ue+u - ..- .
The people of any continuous unincorporated territory, within one or more counties, �✓
may form a community service district by submitting a petition to LAFCO, who then
conducts a noticed public hearing. If the formation is approved by the commission,
LAFCO will direct the County Board of Supervisors to call an election to determine
whether the district should be formed. However, if the formation petition filed with
the Board of Supervisors contains the signatures of 60% of the registered voters
within the proposed district, the Board may order the formation without an election.
The district's board is composed of three or five members, as set forth in the
formation petition, and is elected at large. However, the petition for formation may
state as an alternative that the County Board of Supervisors shall constitute the
Board of Directors. Community Service Districts are usually used for multi-purpose
rural organizations such as the Big Bear Community Services District
6. Utility Districts
Public Utility District
A Public Utility District can only be organized in unincorporated territory. This
restriction limits the applicability of the Public Utility District institution in many
service environments.
The Public Uglily District has similar powers to acquire, construe and operate works
for supplying utilities, to purchase from other utilities the services or commodities .r
furnished by It, and to sell surplus water or power. The number of members on
board of directors varies, depending on whether the district lies entirely in one
county, and the number of territorial units in the district. Many of the districts
surrounding take Tahoe were formed as public utility districts (i.e. South Tahoe
Public Utility District).
7. Joint Powers Agreement
The Joint Exercise of Powers Act allows two or more public agencies to enter into
an agreement to jointly exercise any power they hold In common (JPA). The JPA
represents a contractual arrangement between the members of the JPA
arrangement and can be configured to meet the unique need of its members. Of the
54 statutory types of special districts, the JPA is the second most popular form of
governance after the County Service Area.
The governance structure, operational responsibilities, and the financing options are
relatively flexible under the JPA structure. The Act gives the contracting agencies
the option of contracting to use existing governing boards for the governance
structure or to use a separate governing entity established at the time of formation.
This separate entity can be authorized to exercise independently the powers those
parties hold in common and delegate to it This.allows for central administration and
streamlines decision making.
+ l a -4-
V-14-95 I1: IUAa exult xuuxtt, nuuuturr, arnA m JULUJJU
8. Other Alternatives
In addition to the institutional arrangements reviewed above, several other options
are available.These aftematives depart from local creation of a new special district
a, County Service Area
There are 844 county service areas in the State of California and represent
one of the most widely used forms of Institutional arrangements. County
Service Areas are not independent special districts. They may be formed in
order to provide"extended governmental services"to growing unincorporated
areas and to provide for the levy of taxes to pay for such extended services.
County Service Areas are governed by the County Board of Supervisors, but
may include areas within city boundaries, subject to approval of city
government.
b. County Control
Counties are Specifically authorized to operate and maintain sewage
treatment and disposal facilities. The County Board of Supervisors would
assume power and authority for the operation and maintenance of the
treatment systems. Under this form of institutional arrangement, the County
would have no obligation to limit the use of the system to the area currently
serviced.
C. Districts Created by$oecial Acts
Many sewer districts, and similar organizations are created by special acts
of the legislature and are often referred to as Special Act Districts. Formation
of a Special Act District allows the members of the district to create an entity
with broad powers and services. The agerWs governing administrative and
operations agreement can be tailored to the agency's special and unique
needs. The level of flexibility provided by the Special Act is the primary
attraction to this form of institution. The San Diego County Water Authority
is an example of a Special Act District within the Southern California region.
Formation of a Special Act District includes a legislative approval process
which represents an added level of complexity. Formation of a Special Act
District first requires unanimous approval by all member agencies. The
members must then enter into a negotiations process to draft the special
powers, operational responsibilities, and financial powers for the new entity.
Once member agreement has been reached the legislative approval Special
District is first sponsored by a local state assembly representative(s), and
finally approved by the State Legislature. Formation can require voter
approval if the legislature believes broad consensus is needed.
2eca
a°°iOM -5-
01-14-911 11: 10AN NNUN xuuxix, wuuuxurr, arxx ro 3DIUM I UU 11 Uu i
Conclusion and Recommendation
As the Board can see,there are many other institutional alternatives available under
California law for the public ownership and operation of wastewater control facilities. While
each of these alternatives may have a specific benefit which is distinct from the other
alternatives, it is our recommendation that the consolidation of the nine current county
sanitation districts Into one county sanitation district Is the recommended action because
the county sanitation district organizational entity provides the most comprehensive and
flexible form of agency in the operations of wastewater control facilities. Furthermore, the
County Sanitation District already has a proven track record of a high level of performance
and service to Orange County.
In the consolidation process, each district will have to vote in order to consolidate
the nine districts into one county sanitation district. In the event that there is not a
unanimous agreement by all nine districts, the organizational entity will be two or more
county sanitation districts within the County of Orange.
The initial step for consolidation is the preparation of a resolution by each of the
districts petitioning LAFCO for the consolidation of the nine sanitation districts. We will be
more than happy to provide the necessary documentation for each of the districts for the
requisite petition to LAFCO to initiate the consolidation process.
x�ooaoe
�.mt_r -6-
7114/9( � "
CONSOLIA ION ISSUES
SFR Use Fee Equalization Schedule
Dist User Fee Schedule From 1995-96 Budget Approx Annual User Fees Charged Per Budget Schedule
j�Q 95-98 98-97 87l8 98-99 99j--QQ EDUs 9,5-902 aM_ IlMa 96-99 99-00 5 Yr Total Fee
1 83.24 100.00 120.00 140.00 160.00 74,000 6,159.760 7.400,000 8,880,000 10,360,000 11.840,000 44,639,760
2 75.00 100.00 100.00 125.00 125.00 275,000 20,625,000 27,500.000 27,500,000 34,375,000 34,375,000 144,375,000
3 73.89 75.00 76.00 78.00 80.00 285.000 21,058,650 21,375,000 21,660,000 22,230,000 22.800,000 109,123,650
5 96.75 100.00 105.00 110.00 115.00 28,000 2,709,000 2,800,000 2,940,000 3,080,000 3,220,000 14,749,000
6 76.47 80.00 85.00 90.00 95.00 44,000 3,364,680 3,520,000 3.740,000 3.960,000 4,180,000 18,764,680
7 50.09 52.00 54.00 56.00 60.00 106,000 5,309,540 5,512,000 5,724,000 5,936,000 6,360,000 28,841,540
11 60.00 72.00 84.00 96.00 106.00 52,000 3,120,000 3,744,000 4,368,000 4.992,000 5,512,000 21,736,000
13 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 8,000 800,000 800,000 800,000 800,000 800,000 4,000,000
872,000 63,146,630 72,651,000 75,612,000 85,733,000 89,087,000 386,229,630
_-User_Fee-Schedule to Equalize Fee in 5_Years__ Annual User Fees Charged to Equalize SFR Fee in 5 Years
1 83.24 90.00 97.00 105.00 105,00 74,000 6,159,760 6,660,000 7,178,000 7,770,000 7,770,000 35,537,760
2 75.00 94.00 100.00 105.00 105.00 275,000 20,625,000 25,850,000 27,500,000 28,875,000 28,875,000 131,725,000
3 73.89 80.00 90.00 100.00 105.00 285,000 21.058,650 22,800,000 25,650,000 28,500,000 29,925,000 127,933,650
5 96.75 100.00 100.00 105.00 105.00 28.000 2,709,000 2,800,000 2,800,000 2,940,000 2,940,000 14,189,000
6 76.47 82.00 89.00 97.00 105.00 44,000 3,364,680 3,608,000 3,916,000 4,268,000 4,620,000 19,776,680
7 50.09 60.00 70.00 80.00 105.00 106,000 5,309,540 6,360,000 7,420.000 8,480,000 11,130,000 38,699,540
11 60.00 75.00 85.00 95.00 105.00 52,000 3,120,000 3,900,000 4,420,000 4,940,000 5.460,000 21,840,000
13 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 105.00 8,000 800,000 800,000 800,000 800,000 940,000 4,040,000
8727600 63,146,630 72,778,000 79,684.000 86,573,000 91,560,000 393,741,630
Increase or(Decrease) in Annual Fee Increase or(Decrease)in Annual Total Charges
1 - (10.00) (23.00) (35.00) (55.00) - (740,000) (1,702,000) (2,590,000) (4,070,000) (9,102,000)
2 - (6.00) - (20.00) (20.00) - (1,650,000) - (5,500,000) (5,500,000) (12,650,000)
3 - 5.00 14.00 22.00 26.00 - 1,425,000 3,990,000 6,270,000 7,125,000 18,810,000
5 - - (5.00) (5.00) (10.00) - - (140,000) (140,000) (280,000) (560,000)
6 - 2.00 4.00 7.00 10.00 - 88,000 176.000 308,000 440,000 1,012,000
7 - 8.00 16.00 24.00 45.00 - 848.000 1,696,000 2,544,000 4,770,000 9,858,000
11 - 3.00 1.00 (1.00) (1.00) - 156,000 52,000 (52,000) (52,000) 104,000
13 - - - - 5.00 40,000 40,000
127,000 4,072,000 940,000 2,473,000 7,512,000
CONSOL9.XLS 12:07 PM
Y
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
AGENDA FOR
J U LY 26, 1995
Item (12)(b)(9): EXEC95-03: Consideration of motion approving hiring
Assistant General Manager--Administration at top of
classification range.
Summary
After an extensive search and interview process, we have determined that Judith Wilson
is the best qualified candidate for the position of Assistant General Manager—
Administration. Her qualifications and credentials are excellent, and her experience as
a generalist is exactly what we need. Ms. Wilson is currently working with the Los
Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority as the Executive Officer, Planning and
Programming.
Ms. Wilson reports directly to the Executive Director. She has served in that capacity
for the past five years and has distinguished herself in part as being the only executive
�.✓ to have remained in place during that period. (Miss Wilson's resume is attached.)
This matter is being brought forward through the Committee system because Resolution
No. 95-54 (Classification, Compensation and other terms and conditions) requires Joint
Board approval to hire anyone in any classification "beyond the midpoint of a range."
Since Ms. Wilson's current salary of$128,000 is above the $120,000 top of range for
the Assistant General Manager position, she is requesting and the General Manager is
recommending appointment at top step.
Staff Recommendation
Based on the qualifications and experience Ms. Wilson brings with her to the Districts,
appointment at the top step is appropriate and is recommended.
This matter was discussed at the FAHR Committee at its regular meeting of July 12,
1995 and passed to the Executive Committee.
Executive Committee Recommendation
The Executive Committee recommends approving hiring Assistant General Manager—
Administration at top of classification range.
Ja�-nee
JUDITH A. WILSON
br/ 632 South Grand Avenue
Pasadena, CA 91105
(H) 818-441-1779
(0) 213-244-6576
EXPERIENCE
EXECUTIVE OFFICER, PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
818 West Seventh Street
Los Angeles, California 90017
April 1993 - Present
In the newly reorganized LACMTA, as Executive Officer for Planning
and Programming, I am responsible for all bus, rail, and highway
planning and programming for Los Angeles County. Under my
supervision are the Multimodal Area Teams which do project
management, joint development, research, and economic development;
Countywide Planning, which includes: transit systems integration;
Transportation Demand Management; Modeling; and compliance with ADA
and Congestion Management requirements; Capital Planning, which
includes long-term financial planning; grants management; benefit
assessment; and financial programming.
This division is one of four line departments reporting to the CEO
and includes staff from the now merged LACTC and the SCRTD.
DEPUTY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
Los Angeles County Transportation Commission/LACMTA
818 West Seventh Street
Los Angeles, CA 90017
April 1990 - April 1993
I managed the overall rail, bus, and highway planning and
programming for Los Angeles County. Working with six multimodal,
geographically based Area Teams, I oversaw the rail planning
program from the preliminary planning stage through environmental
clearance and preliminary engineering. My organization provided
technical support to 17 bus transit operators and 89 local
jurisdictions in securing formula and discretionary funding. The
Area Teams were also responsible for preparing, in consultation
with Caltrans, the Authority' s proposals for the State
Transportation Improvement Program and the implementation of the
HOV Master Plan.
• N
UDITH A. WILSON
RESUME
PAGE TWO
I also supervised the Congestion Management Program, the Americans
with Disabilities Act Compliance Program, and the overall
transportation systems planning, including Transportation Demand
Management and support to the Los Angeles cities with commuter rail
stations .
Also under my supervision was the Safety Authority for Freeway
Emergencies (SAFE) program, which upgraded all freeway call boxes
to cellular solar power equipment, and the newly established
Freeway Service Patrol.
ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER 1986 - 1990
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES AGENCY 1985 - 1986
DIRECTOR
ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER 1982 - 1985
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT TO THE 1980 - 1982
CITY MANAGER
City of Pasadena
100 North Garfield Avenue
Pasadena, CA 91101
September 1980 March 1990
Working through a series of progressively responsible positions, as
Assistant City Manager I managed all of the administrative services
for the city such as purchasing, fleet maintenance, data
processing, print shop, and public facilities as well as managing
the Housing and Community Development Department, including all
discretionary land use, building inspection, planning, and zoning.
In addition to these responsibilities, I supervised the city's
lobbyists in Sacramento and Washington D. C. and managed the city' s
public information programs, including KPAS, the city' s cable
television channel.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATOR/
SENIOR POLICY ANALYST
Government of the Virgin Islands
Virgin Islands Department of Commerce
St. Thomas, U.S.V.I.
April 1976 - August 1980
`�N
i
JDDITH A. WILSON
RESUME
PAGE THREE
In this position, I was responsible for preparing the territory' s
Overall Economic Development Plan (OEDP) and supervising the
implementation of various economic development projects on St.
Thomas, St. John, and St. Croix. I provided the staff support to
the Governor' s Economic Policy Council and prepared a_ variety of
initiatives to secure Federal funds for such project as two new
hospitals, an expanded airport, and three desalination plants.
I also prepared analysis on tariff issues, dealing with specialized
customs duties, and presented briefs before the Federal Maritime
Commission to ensure that shipping tariffs maintained the Virgin
Islands competitive position.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL FISCAL RELATIONS OFFICER
Northern Virginia Transportation Commission
Arlington, Virginia
February 1974 - April 1976
In this position, I was responsible for coordinating the financial
support for the Virginia share of the Metrobus Capital and
Operating Program, as well as the Metro Rail Capital Project, which
was under construction at that time. I represented the cities of
Falls Church, Fairfax City, Alexandria, the counties of Arlington
and Fairfax, and the Commonwealth of Virginia. This position
entailed negotiations among the other funding partners (Maryland,
the District of Columbia, and the Federal government) , as well as
negotiations between and among the Virginia jurisdictions in the
allocation of capital costs and operating subsidies. I also
lobbied extensively with the state legislature for additional
revenue sources.
ASSISTANT FINANCE DIRECTOR/BUDGET OFFICER
City of Falls Church
Falls Church, Virginia
October 1972 - February 1974
In this position, I prepared the annual budget for the city,
monitored all departmental expenditures, and negotiated wage
settlements with bargaining units. I also provided direct staff
support to the City Manager and City Council and represented the
City on the Police and Fire Disability Retirement Board.
P
JDDITH A. WILSON
RESUME
PAGE FOUR
MANAGEMENT ANALYST
Port Authority of New York and New Jersey
World Trade Center
New York, New York
June 1970 - March 1971
This was a rotational assignment. I performed internal management
audits of various operating departments in the Port Authority. The
Port Authority includes the operation of the New York and Northern
New Jersey metropolitan area' s airports, bridges, tunnels,
container ports, and the Port Authority Trans Hudson Rail System
(PATH) .
EDUCATION
Skidmore College
Saratoga Springs, N.Y. 1969 B. A.
Special Honors:
Editor-In-Chief, Skidmore News, 1968 - 1969
Columbia University Book Prize, 1968
General Electric College Bowl Team, 1968
Maxwell School of Public Affairs
Syracuse University 1970 M.P.A.
Syracuse, New York
Special Honors :
Andrew Mellon Fellow
Kennedy School of Government 1986 State and
Harvard University Local
Cambridge, Massachusetts - Government
Program
Special Honors: Certificate
Elected to 4-Year Term Kennedy School Board
1988 - 1992
r
JUDITH A. WILSON
�../ RESUME
PAGE FIVE
AWARDS
Henry Scoville Award, American Society for Public Administration
1984 (given annually to an : outstanding young government
professional in the Los Angeles Metropolitan Area) . -
Gold Rey Award, Pasadena Arts Council, 1990 - In recognition of
efforts to initiate the Pasadena Arts Commission and an Art In
Public Places program.
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
American Society for Public Administration - Board Member
Central City Association - Board Member
Commuter Transportation Services - Board Member
American Public Transit Association
International City Management Association
Women's Transportation Seminar
Vn/
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
.. AGENDA FOR
JULY 26, 1995
Item (12)(b)(1 Q): EXEC95-04: Consideration of motion to receive and file
the Finance Function Review—Final Report prepared by
Ernst &Young
Summary
The management consulting firm of Ernst & Young was asked to conduct a Finance Department
assessment at the January 1995 Joint Board meeting. That assessment or review has been
completed and a final report has been prepared. A presentation on the report was presented at
the July 19, 1995 Executive Committee meeting.
When the report was being prepared, the Finance Department included the functional areas of:
Finance, Accounting, Purchasing and Warehousing, and Information Services. The report
assesses the role and effectiveness of the Finance Department functions, compares against
industry"leading practices," identifies areas for improvement and proposes action plans and
�a.✓ timelines.
Copies of the report were given to the Executive Committee members. If any director wishes a
copy, please contact Gary Streed.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Executive Committee receive and file the Finance Function Review-
Final Report, prepared by Ernst & Young.
Executive Committee Recommendation
The Executive Committee recommends that the Joint Boards of Directors receive and file the
Finance Function Review-Final Report, prepared by Ernst & Young.
J 1WPWlT&SAGB5NA1]BIO
r
r
MASTER PLAN FOR THE
LEMON HEIGHTS
SEWER SYSTEM
Contract Number 7-16
7 County Sanitation District
0 Number 7 of Orange County
Fjowle
FFpFESS/qy
r rip FQ.ENv
v Z
No C177i4 m
P.O.Box 3030
qlf OF C£LCe��,\
December 1991
OC-007-153-00
County Sanitation District Number 7 of Orange County
LEMON HEIGHTS SEWER PLAN
December 1991
I GENERAL
Lemon Heights, an unincorporated area, is located in the Tustin Hills north of the main City of
Tustin and to the east of the new Tustin Ranch development which recently annexed to the City
of Tustin. The terrain Is hilly with irregular road patterns. Road profiles are also irregular and
public roads don't necessarily follow contour patterns. Private roads provide access to a
number of the homes in the area and they are also irregular and may not follow contour
- patterns. Many are narrow and In marginal condition, and a few are located outside the
boundaries of the recorded easements.
There is a ridge line which essentially cuts through the center of the study area, the easterly
section draining east to Peters Canyon (Tustin Ranch) and the westerly section draining south,
— west, and northwesterly.
Currently 154 lots have houses and 22 lots are undeveloped.
11 TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING
.� The study area has been topographically mapped with 2-foot contour intervals and existing
homes, and structures such as swimming pools and tennis court locations plotted on the
.d
maps. The maps are stored in five digitized floppy disks in micro station format.
-1-
Property lines, public and private road easements taken from recorded tract maps have been
digitized in micro station format and superimposed on the topographic base map(s). The base
maps (five floppy disks) can be printed out to any scale. The aerial photograph was flown for a
V = 40' base map reproduction which is the scale recommended for construction drawings.
v
III PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING
A. Drainage
There is a ridge line that bisects the Lemon Heights study area. The easterly
area drains to Peters Canyon while the westerly area drains South, west and
northwest. In each major drainage area there are many subareas due to
secondary ridge lines with accompanying gullies. This situation is somewhat
advantageous in that it permits development of independent small trunk
systems, which might be more conducive for various property owner groups to
initiate construction of sewage facilities.
B. Sewage System Preliminary Design
The study area was subdivided into 20 drainage basin areas with 23 sub basin
�^ areas. Consequently, there are 20 independent trunk systems. Each trunk
system can at present or in the future connect to offsite trunks which lie around
the periphery of Lemon Heights. There are 23 subtrunks to the main systems,
each lot has been assigned to a trunk or subtrunk. The trunks and subtrunks are
coded alphabetically in a clockwise manner. Lot assignments are also coded
alphabetically to the particular letter code of the trunk or subtrunk to which the
house lateral will connect to for sewer service. Drain basin areas 'A; -B; -C; -D'
-2-
and 'S' drain east to the Tustin Ranch Development. The rest drain southwest
and northwest to existing CSD No.7 sewers.
There are a few ahemative trunk layouts which could be utilized depending on
development of adjacent properties in Tustin Ranch. For instance, it the Harvard
Trunk in Peters Canyon Road next to Lemon Heights was placed Into operation,
and the Covey Lane Pump Station deactivated by a gravity line to the Harvard
Trunk via the proposed 'L' Street sewer, lots SA4,5, 6, 7 and BAB, BAB1, BAB2,
BCS, BCA1 and BA2 could be served by the Lemon Heights Drive-Covey Lane
system rather than perhaps having to wait for development of the 'B' Trunk
_ System. There are other possibilities which depend on future tract layouts in
Tustin Ranch. These situations are apparent upon examination of the
r topographic-trunk system map. Also there are some individual parcels that
could be re-assigned depending how adjacent sewer projects might develop and
the elevation relationship of the existing house lateral to these potential projects.
The sewer plan was developed to provide an all gravity system for the entire
study area. In view of the irregular topography, some sewers are located along
side property lines, where vehicular access may not be feasible for maintenance
operations in the future. Therefore, it should be noted that maintenance of those
areas may require small portable equipment that can be carried to the she.
However, since most of the sewers in these areas will have a steep slope with
corresponding high flow velocities, periods between required maintenance are
expected to be significantly greater than normal.
e.
-3-
C. Easements
Full implementation of the sewer plan will require 82 separate permanent
easements over private property be acquired. Thirty of these easements lie in
r
private roads serving more than one property and are noted as Class 'A'
easements on the Data Sheet. It is assumed Class 'A' easements will be
dedicated free of charge to the District as the various sewer projects develop. In
CSD No. 7 past projects similar to the Lemon Heights situation has been the
case.
The other 52 permanent easements for the most part are located along side or
rear property lines of individual lots. They are required because of topographic
relationship to the various drainage areas. These easements are noted as Class
r
'B' on the Data Sheet. Likewise on past CSD No. 7 projects, many have been
dedicated free of charge.
s.
It should be noted some temporary construction easements may be required,
although they cannot be identified at this time. There is normally no or minimal
cost associated with such temporary easements.
IV DATA SHEETS
r
Lot assignments to specific trunks and subtrunks as noted on the topographic map are
presented in tabular form on the Data Sheet. The Orange County Assessor's parcel number for
each lot is also given. Sewer lengths posted apply to the length of line In the public or private
.. road adjacent to the lot, or in a Class easement on the lot. All lengths are approximate and
will be refined in final design.
4-
V. PROJECT AND CLASS "B" EASEMENT COSTS
Project and Class 'B' easement costs are estimated for each drainage basin area and included
on the data sheet. Project costs Include construction costs plus an allowance of 22 percent for
engineering, inspection, construction surveying and contract administration. Class 'B'
easement costs are based on a 20400t wide permanent easement in accordance with the
.. Districts staff recommendation at a cost of$1.20 per square foot. Other costs associated with
r
implementation of the sewer system, such as annexation and connection fees, assessment
district costs and homeowner costs are not included in the project costs.
y For those drainage basins which have subdrainage basins, costs are further broken down for
each sub-area. In some of the large drainage basins such as Area "B" there are considerable
possibilities for construction projects independent of the entire basin. Project size can influence
the construction cost, since usually the larger the project the lower the unit costs. The costs
posted on the data sheets where there are sub-areas are average costs for the entire drainage
area if it were to be constructed as one project, and not indicative for any particular project that
might be split off from the whole area.
Other anomalies for situations where a sub-area might be the initial project occur in regard to
financing the construction of an 'outfall trunk' serving the entire drainage area. As an example,
s, take the case of the sub-area'BB'. Assume it is the first project in B drainage area and lots BB1
through BB6 wish to form an assessment district or proceed with a cash up front project.
Outfall trunk 'B' from "M' Street would have to be constructed up to the junction of 'BB'
subtrunk. The cost of the outfall trunk would be split equally between lots BB1 through BB6 and
r
the remaining costs for the 'BB'trunk would also be split equally since the benefit received'for
.. each lot is identical, namely sewer service for a residential lot. However, In the future, as
upstream lots build sewers which discharge into outfall trunk 'B; reimbursement to the initial
BB1-BB6 lot owners should be made on a prorata basis taking into account the number of lots
3-
served by the outfall portion of trunk "B.' As properties are sewered upstream of subtrunk 'BB'
.. they pay for their own construction costs equally (same benefit received) and the initial property
owners on 'BB'are not reimbursed for their'BB"subtrunk costs to sewer their lots.
-6-
LEMON NEIGTNS SEWER PLAN
May 20, 1992
Drainage Total Sever Total Seger Class "A" Class "B" Project (1) Class ^8^
Drainage Basin Assessors Lot Drainage Trunk Sever Required Per Required Per Easement Easement Cost Easement Cost
Basin Area Sub-Ares Parcel No. No. Length Sub-Area Area Length Length S S
.......... ........ .......... ............ ........... ............ ............ ......... ......... ............ .............
"A^ 503-491-28 Al 400 145
503-491-29 A2 195 165 110
503-491-31 A3 245
503-491-37 A4 170
503-491-25 AS
503-491-34 A6 195
503-491-24 A7 15
1,205
"AN. 503-491-27 AA1 195
503-491.36 AA2 160 60
503.491-38 AAS 140
345
1,550 121,024 4,080
560
^B" 5D2-391-07 91 730 320
502-391-01 02 195 1"
502-381-08 93 120 130 log
502-381-06 84 135 230 160
502-381-20 B5
502-341-06 B6 230
502-341-05 B7 235
502-362-14 88 420 I55
502-362-13 B9 140 320
502-362.12 610 175 380
502-362-11 Bit 180 160
502-372-09 812 150 100
502-372-17 013 IN
502-372-DB 814 135 100
502-372-07 815 130
3,155 230,946 61,080
470
"BA^ 502-401-03 RAI 450
502.341-24 BA2 290 100
502-341-23 SO
502-341-21 BA4 100
502-341-22 BA5 125 145
502-341-15 BA6 100
502-341-14 8A7 200
502-341.13 BAB 150
502-353-08 BA9 160
1.575 122,976 2,400
^BAA" 502-391-04 BM1 220 260
502-391-02 RARE 220 130
502-341-19 BAA3 185
502-341-18 BW
625 45,750 9,360
"B4B" 502-341-21 B6B1 10D
592-341-27 B492
100 14,054
"BB" 502-381-16 691 130
502-381-09 BB2 70
502-381-10 893 185 160
502-351-02 684 80
502-381.11 895 250 260
502-361-02 896 100
503-491-18 B87 330
503-491-12 BBB
503-491-17 BB9 140
503-491-13 8810 80
503-491-16 BB11
503-491-14 B812 130
503-491-15 BB12
1,395 102,114 12,480
"B04" 502-381-21 B841 185
185 13,542
"BBB" 503-491-69 6891 250
503-491-63 B992
503-491-68 8683
503-491-64 8084
503-491-67 B885
503-491-65 SBB6
503-491-66 0087
250 19,520
"BBC" 503-491-20 BBC1 10D 95
503-491-21 BBC2 10D 135
503-491-22 BBC3 130 190
503-491-23 BBC4 210
540 42,163 4,560
"BC^ 502-381-21 BC1 95
502341-07 BC2 80
502-341-09 BC3 130 310
502-341.26 BC4
502-341-11 BCS 130
502-341-03 BC6 230 120
502-353-03 BC7 50 440
502-341-02 BCB 70 125
502-341-01 BC9 130 130
502-353-02 BOB 25
502-362-07 BC11 110
1,050 81,984 27,000
•BG^ 502-341-12 BG1 175
502-353-04 BG2
502-353-05 BG3 100
502.353-M BG4 135
502-353-01 BUS 165
575 44,8%
"8G" 502-362-16 BD1 40 150 230
502.341-04 BD2 110
502-362-15 BD3 290 80
502-362-09 9D4 290
502-362-08 BD5 90
530 41,382 ?'"0
"BE^ 502-373-16 BE1 160 140
502-372-15 BE2
502-372-11 BE3 40
502-372-10 BE4 60
260 19,032
°B7" 502-362-10 BE1 150 160
502-362-05 Bf2 165
502-362-86 Bi3 200
502-362-04 B94 330
845 61,654 3,x0
502-362-02 BG1 125
502-372-10 BG2
125 9,150
11,290 849,364 128,160
480
502-401-03 C1 300 265
502-401-06 C1
502-401-05 C2 265 245
502-401-01 C3 245
502-401-01 C4 150
'CA- 502-334-0 G1 100 810 150
502333-02
502-333-05 6 C63
502-333-0 G4
502-333-013 C6 CAS
502-354-0 CB6
502-354-02 C67
502-354-0B
502.354-04 3 G9
502-342-0 G10
502-342-012 3 G G1u 10
soz-xz-o1 G 100
no
1,120 83,497 30,960
200
"D" 502-334-02 D1 220 390
502-334-21 D2 200
420
"06" 502-334-05 D61 125
502-334-04 D62
502-334.23 083 90
215
635 46,482 14,160
t t t e [ [ [ t [ e e e t e t [ [ [
•F• 502.331-01 F1 260 130
190 ,50
502-332-04 F3 113
2"
$02-332-02 FS 290
502-332-02 F4 1280
25
502-332-02 FS 125
•F6• 502-351.05 F61 210 1,070
210
•F6• 502-332-03 FBI 120
502.332-01 F12 200
502-352-06 F83 140
502.352.05 FB3
460
1,740 134,834 7,920
•G• 502-352-03 01
502.351.03 02
100 ?,us
•N• 502-361-06 N1 110
502-361-05 N2
S02.361-04 N3 140
S02-361-03 N4 00
SGZ-371-01 NS 100
502-361-02 NS
502-361.01 N5
430 33,574
•J• 502.441-04 J1
502.441.03 J2 230
502.441-02 J3 240 270
502.441.01 R 300 250
502.441-07 .15
S02-431-03 J6 240 00
502-431-05 J7 00
060 67,149
•K• 502.432-11 K1 165 1"
502.432-10 K2 165
330 24,156 4,960
•L• 502.432-07 L1 225 200
502-432.06 LZ 120 120
sox-432-12 a 340 310
S02-432-05 L4 195
e e e e a a e a a a e a e e e e e e e
502-432-04 L5 215
900 70,272 9,460
502-432-03 M1 260
502-432-02 M2 240 120
502-432-01 M3 135
635 49,581 2,880
40
502-095-02 N1 240
502-095-02 N2
240 18,739 960
502-411-11 P1 600
502-093-03 P2 520
502-372-01 P3 390
502-362-01 P4 490
502-372-03 PS 115
502-372-02 P6 90 220
502-372-19 P7 225
2,430
"PA• 502-411-04 PA1 195
502-411-02 PAZ 350 150
502-422-01 PA3 650 150
502-422-02 PA4 175 100
502-422-11 PAS
502-422-09 PA6 165 220
502-422-10 PAT
1,535 220
140
"PM" 502-411-06 PM1 340
502-411-01 PAA2
340
•PAV 502-422-12 PA81 165
165
'PAC' 502-422-03 PAC1 160
160
2,200 347,846 18,240
•0• 502-412-09 01 170 100
502-412-06 02 180
502-412-05 03 100
450
"0.A• 502-412-10 "1 /50
150
600 46,116 2,400
l t [ [ t t t I t I t I 1 I I I 1 t t
200
502-421-03 111 240 160
502-421-01 R2 170
410 30,012 8'"0
"So 502.372.14 81 110 150
502-373-13 52 160
270 21,082
TOTAL SERER REQUIRED FOR DISTRICT 23,310 4,290a" 9,685 " 1,951,536 232,440
.......................................
t1) Project Cost imiudes Qarotruction cast plus and a1loRanee of 22% for engineering,
Irmeetlon and contract edoinistratlan.
4.. s
r
r
r
MASTER PLAN FOR THE
ORANGE PARK ACRES
r
SEWER SYSTEM
Contract No. 7-18
r County Sanitation District
No. 7 of Orange County
r
oQpOFESS/p,7q
.Wpm JQEUGEMEsr Efy
.23
y a y
w No.C17714 � m
En.:6 7 A
r rl CIVIL
Enc7tneerincj �EOF CA0OP
Corporation
r
Newport Beach,CA 92658-90W
r
JUNE 1994
r OC-007-155-01
r
.. County Sanitation District Number 7 of Orange County
ORANGE PARK ACRES SEWER PLAN
JUNE1994
I GENERAL
Orange Park Acres is an unincorporated area in the County of Orange surrounded
completely by the City of Orange and made up of approximately 434 acres.
Orange Park Acres' main arterial is Orange Park Blvd which splits the study area
and is located between Santiago Canyon Road and Chapman Avenue. The terrain
is hilly with steep areas to the west of Orange Park Blvd and is primarily made up
of large parcels. Access to a number of the homes is provided by private access
roads that follow contour patterns and usually have descending elevations to public
streets. These private access roads are not all paved and vary between 10 and 30
feet in width.
The study area's low point is Handy Creek which cuts through the northern section
and flows toward the northwest, into the Orange County Flood Control District
facilities IOCFCDI. Handy Creek also runs through the rear of various properties
and has very limited access.
The sewer study has identified 394 parcel lots that will require construction of
V' various sewers to outfalls in order to be serviced. Of the 394 parcel lots, 22 are
undeveloped.
II TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING
Topographic mapping of the study area was flown on August 11, 1992 and
prepared by Rattray & Associates Inc. The study area was mapped with 2-foot
contour intervals showing curbs and gutters, street striping, existing homes, trees,
swimming pools, tennis courts and various other structures. The maps are stored
on twenty-four digital floppy disks in the micro-station format.
Property lines, public and private access road easements, right-of-way, and
centerline information was obtained from record of surveys, recorded tract and
ORANGE PARK ACRES SEWER PLAN -1- JUNE 1994
wr
r
bl
parcel maps and have been mapped in micro-station format and superimposed on
the topographic base maps. Existing county, city, and private sewers have also
been mapped from construction drawings with manhole ground and invert
elevations shown. With the use of micro-station, the base maps can be printed out
to any scale. The aerial photographs were flown for 1 " = 40' base map
reproduction which is the scale recommended for construction drawings.
d
III PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING
aos
A. Drainage
The general drainage pattern for the southern portion of the study area is east
toward the City of Orange local sewers which eventually drain into the Orange Park
.. Acres Trunk. In the northern portion of the study area the drainage pattern is
northeast toward Handy Creek. Handy Creek flows toward the northwest and runs
r through the rear of various properties which have limited access. Drainage from
this northern portion of the study area eventually drain into the Santiago Canyon
Road Trunk and west into District No 7.
r
B. Sewage System Preliminary Design
r
The study area was subdivided into 17 sewer service areas with 30 sub-service
areas and 17 proposed trunks systems. Each proposed trunk system connects to a
nearby existing trunk outfall owned either by the City of Orange, the County
Sanitation District, or a privately owned sewer. Also note that some of these
r
existing sewers lie within the Orange Park Acres study area.
There are 46 trunks and subtrunks to the main systems which have parcels
assigned to them. The trunks and subtrunks are coded alphabetically in a
r clockwise manner. Parcel lot assignments are also coded alphabetically to the
particular letter code of the trunk or subtrunk to which the house lateral will
ultimately connect to for sewer service.
Parcel lots that are within the study area and have direct access to an existing
sewer, owned by the City of Orange, the Sanitation District, or privately owned,
have been eliminated from the study and thus from any proposed assessment
r
ORANGE PARK ACRES SEWER PLAN -2- JUNE 1994
b
�P
r
district. The Sanitation District's policy permits direct connections to trunks or
subtrunks up to and including 24 inches in diameter and likewise the City of Orange
will permit connections to their sewers subject to meeting their requirements.
Twenty lots within the study area already have sewer lateral connections to
existing trunks and are shown on the sewer plan plate in the rear of this report.
Also, note that the City of Orange has records of several of the sewer laterals that
e are off of the "AA" trunk system but no information that indicates the locations of
these laterals is available.
m
Sewer service areas "J", "K", "M", "MA", "N", "0", "P", "O", "R", "S", and "T"
which are located in the southern portion of the study area drain northeast into City
owned sewers that eventually drain into the Sanitation District's Orange Park Acres
Trunk. Sewer service areas "A", "B", and "C" are located in the northern portion
r of the study area and drain directly into the Sanitation District's Santiago Canyon
Road Trunk. Sewer service area "V" is located in the northwest portion of the
study area and drains northwest to a City of Orange sewer located along
Portsmouth Circle. The remaining service areas drain to the City of Orange trunk
located along Clark Lane between Orange Park Blvd and Randall Street, along
!' Randall Street between Clark Lane and Meads Avenue, and along Meads Avenue
between Randall Street and approximately 250 feet south of Acre Place.
The City of Orange trunk previously described is the connecting middle section of
c, two County Sanitation Trunks (the Santiago Canyon Road Trunk and the Orange
Park Acre Trunk). Preliminary construction costs for the replacement of this trunk
(Clark, Randall, & Meads Replacement) have been developed and compared to an
alternative. The alternative was to construct a trunk along Handy Creek which
would begin at the intersection of Clark Lane and Orange Park Blvd, head south
'0 along Orange Park Blvd to Handy Creek, southeast along Handy Creek through the
rear of lots U5, W26, WA1 , IA5, IA3, 12, and W32, and north approximately 250'
•.+ along Meads Avenue. From these two alternatives, the Clark, Randall, & Meads
alternative was selected by the District. This alternative was selected for the
e, following reasons:
a) The difficulty of right-of-way acquisitions and the cost of
ti
legal fees for approximately 1,850 feet over seven separate
parcels make this alternative undesirable.
w
ORANGE PARK ACHES SEWER PLAN .3- JUNE 1994
ae
ti
b) The construction difficulties that will arise, such as limited access and equipmen
movability, and lack of space make this alternative impractical.
c) The natural formation of Handy Creek has been altered with retaining walls
serving as banks with grade build-up on the sides at certain sections. The high
,e cost of restoring the creek to its current condition make this alternative
undesirable.
m
This sewer plan was developed to operate as an "all gravity system" for the entire
study area, so some sewers had to be located along the side property lines, such as
the "Ll" and the "N" Trunks. At these locations where vehicular access may not be
feasible for maintenance operations, curved sewers were laid out to eliminate
manholes. Therefore, it should be noted that maintenance of those areas may
require small portable equipment that can be carried to the site. But since most of
the sewers in these areas will have a steep slope with corresponding high flow
velocities, the required maintenance should be less frequent than normally
experienced.
At the request of the District, the "IG" trunk, which is located in the northeastern
portion of the study area, has been extended approximately 260 feet up to the City
of Orange boundary. By extending the trunk, parcel lots that are located at the
,. north end of the access easement and within the City of Orange can be serviced.
When the City decides to provide service to these parcel lots, the owners of the
lots will have to pay their direct benefit costs, as in any Assessment District.
C. Easements
Full implementation of the sewer plan will require acquisition of 41 separate
�+ permanent easements over private property and private access roads. Twenty-five
of these easements lie in private roads serving more than one property or in Orange
s, County Flood Control property and are noted as Class "A" easements on the data
spreadsheet. It is assumed that Class "A" easements will be dedicated free of
charge to the District as the various sewer projects develop. This has been the
case for similar projects located in District No. 7, such as the Lemon Heights and
Cowan Heights projects.
ORANGE PARK ACRES SEWER PLAN -4- JUNE 1994
e.r
r
d
The other 16 permanent easements are located along the side or rear property lines
of individual lots. They are required because of the topographic relationship to the
various drainage areas. These easements are noted as Class "B" on the data
spreadsheet. Also, note that the cost for all Class "B" easements has been
included in the speadsheet even though these types of easements have been
.,, dedicated free of charge for similar projects in District No. 7.
r
It should be noted that some temporary construction easements may be required,
although they cannot be identified at this time. Usually, there is no or minimal cost
associated with such temporary easements.
d
IV DATA SHEETS
Lot assignments to specific trunks and subtrunks as noted on the topographic
s, sewer study map are presented in tabular form on the data spreadsheet. The
Orange County Assessor's parcel number for each lot is also given with each lot
identification number. Trunk sewer lengths posted apply to the length of line in the
public and private roads, and to proposed sewers that are adjacent or cut across
private property. Class "A" easements lengths apply to sewer lengths that are in
s private access easements or OCFCD property and Class "B" easements apply to
lengths that are in private property. All lengths are approximate and will be refined
,.. in the final design.
V PROJECT COST & CLASS "B" EASEMENTS COST
Project cost and Class "B" easement cost are estimated for each sewer service area
and are included on the data spreadsheet. The project costs are based on a $78
per lineal foot of sewer, that includes construction costs plus an allowance of 22
d percent for engineering, inspection, construction surveying, and contract
administration. Class "B" easements are based on a 20-foot wide permanent
r easement at a cost of a $1 .20 per square foot. This criteria is in accordance with
the District staff's recommendation. Other costs associated with implementation
of the sewer system, such as annexation and connection fees, assessment district
ee
costs, and homeowner costs are not included in the project costs. The total project
and Class "B" easement costs are $3.0 million and $120 thousand respectively.
r
ORANGE PARK ACRES SEWER PLAN 5 JUNE 1994
ty
d
For those sewer service areas which have sub-service areas, the costs are further
broken down for each sub-service area (see data spreadsheet at the end of this
report). In some of the large service areas, such as Area "I" there are considerable
e' possibilities for construction projects independent of the entire service area. Project
size can influence the Construction cost, since usually the larger the project the
e, lower the unit costs. The costs identified on the data spreadsheets where there are
sub-service areas are average costs for the entire service area and are not indicative
.s
for any particular project that might be split off from the whole area.
Other situations where a sub-service areas might be the initial project occur in
regard to financing the construction of an "outfall trunk" serving the entire service
area. As an example, take the case of the sub-service area "UA". Assume it is the
.+ first project in the "U" service area and lots UA1 and UA6 wish to form an
assessment district or proceed with a cash up front project. Outfall trunk "U" along
s Orange Park Blvd would have to be constructed up to the junction of the "UA"
subtrunk. The cost of the outfall "U" trunk would be split equally between lots
UA1 through UA6 and the remaining costs for the "ILIA" trunk would also be split
equally since the benefit received for each lot is identical, namely sewer service for
a residential lot. However, in the future, as upstream lots build sewers which
s discharge into outfall trunk "U", reimbursement to the initial UA1 through UA6 lot
owners should be made on prorated basis taking into account the number of lots
,., served by the outfall portion of the "U" trunk. As properties are sewered upstream
of the "U" trunk, they pay for their own construction cost equally (same benefit
received) and the initial property owners on "ILIA" are not reimbursed for their "ILIA"
subtrunk costs to sewers their lots.
w
s
d
of
a
ORANGE PARK ACRES SEWER PLAN -6- JUNE 1994
sY
1 1 1 1 1 1, 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 9 1
MASTER PLAN FOR ORANGE PARK ACRES SEWER SYSTEM
CONTRACT N0.7.18 CLASS'B"EASEMENT COST 24 (f/FI]
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7 OF ORANGE COUNTY PROJECT COST 78 (ST T)
2123M
OC-007-155-01
SERVICE TRUNK TOTAL SEWER TOTALSEWER CLASS'A' CLASS'B' CLASS"B"
SEWER SEWER AREA SEWER REQUIRED PER REQUIRED PER EASEMENT EASEMENT PROJECT(1) EASEMENT
SERVICE SERVICE ASSESSOR LOT LENGTH SUB-AREA AREA LENGTH LENGTH COST COST
AREA SUB-AREA PARCEL NO. NO. (FT.) (FT.) (F7.) (FT.) (FT.) f f
"A" 379481-3 AI
379451.11 A2
379451.3 A3 220 220
3794514 A4
220
"B" 379481-8 B2
379491.6 B3
379491.10 94
379481.5 B5 470 425
470
'C. 379-571-13 CI
379-571-12 C2
379-571-11 C3
379-571-10 C4
379471.9 CS
379-571-8 C6 350
3".571-7 C7
379-571-6 CS
379-571-5 C9
(1)PROJECT COST INCLUDES CONSTRUCTION COST PLUS AN ALLOWANCE OF 22%FOR ENGINEERING,INSPECTION,AND CONTRACT ADMMISTRAMON.
a a a a a a a a t a a t a a a a a a a
-8-
MASTER PLAN FOR ORANGE PARK ACRES SEWER SYSTEM
CONTFLACTNO.7-18 CLASS"R"EASEMENT COST 24 ($/Ff)
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7 OF ORANGE COUNTY PROJECT COST 78
2413194
OCC07.155-01
SERVICE TRUNK TOTALSEWER TOTALSEWER CLASS"A" CLASS'B- CLASS"B"
SEWER SEWER AREA SEWER REQUIRED PER REQUIREDPER EASEMENT EASEMENT PROJECT(1) EASEMENT
SERVICE SERVICE ASSESSOR LOT LENGTH SUB-AREA AREA LENGTH LENGTH COST COST
AREA SUB-AREA PARCELNO. NO. (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.)
379.5714 CIO
379.571.3 C11
379.571-I C12 320
379-571.2 C13
670
379.571-14 DI
379-572.9 D2
379-571-15 D3
379-572.8 D1
379-571-16 D5
379-572-7 D6
379-571-17 D7
379-572.6 DB
379-571-19 IN 330
379-572-5 D10
379-57149 D11
379-5724 D12
379-571-20 D13
3T9-572-3 D14
379-57141 D15
379-572-21 D16
379-571.22 D17
379-572-22 D18
379-571-23 D19
(1)PROJECT COST INCLUDES CONSTRUCTION COST PLUS AN ALLOWANCE OF 22%FOR ENGINEERING,INSPECTION,AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION.
A-
MASTER PLAN FOR ORANGE PARK ACRES SEWER SYSTEM
CONTRACT NO.7-I9 CLASS-B'EASEMENT COST 24 (vm
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7 OF ORANGE COUNTY PROJECT COST 78 (S/FT)
20194
0CC07-155.01
SERVICE TRUNK TOTALSEWER TOTALSEWER CLASS'A' CLASS'B' CLASS"B'
SEWER SEWER AREA SEWER REQUIRED PER REQUIRED PER EASEMENT EASEMENT PROJECT(1) EASEMENT
SERVICE SERVICE ASSESSOR LOT LENGTH SUB-AREA AREA LENGTH LENGTH COST COST
AREA SUB-AREA PARCEL NO. NO. (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) S S
379-571-24 D20 320
'E' 379-582-16 El
379-582-15 E2
379-591-14 ES 370
379-581-12 E4
379-381-11 ES 360
379-391-10 E6
379-581-9 E7
3794814 ES 255
379-581-7 E9
379-5814 E10
379-581-5 Ell
379-S9I4 E12
379-581-3 E13 255
1,240 96,720 0
'EA' 379-581-13 EA1
379-582-13 RAI
37MI11-14 EAS
379-591-15 EA4
379-582-8 EA5
379-582-7 EA6
379-581-16 EA7
(1)PROJECT COST INCLUDES CONSTRUCTION COST PLUS AN ALLOWANCE OF 22%FOR ENGMEERING,INSPECTION,AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION.
t I I t t I I t I I I 1 I 1 I I I I
-10.
MASTER PLAN FOR ORANGE PARK ACRES SEWER SYSTEM
CONTRACT NO.7.18 CLASS"B"EASEMENT COST 24 (SfFT)
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7 OF ORANGE COUNTY PROJECT COST 78 (sTn
MY94
OC-007.155-01
SERVICE TRUNK TOTALSEWER TOTAL SEWER CLASS'A" CLASS"B" CLASS'B"
SEWER SEWER AREA SEWER REQUIRED PER REQUIRED PER EASEMENT EASEMENT PROJECT(]) EASEMENT
SERVICE SERVICE ASSESSOR LOT LENGTH SUB-AREA AREA LENGTH LENGTH COST COST
AREA SUB-AREA PARCEL NO. NO. (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) S S
379.591.17 EAS 350
379-582.6 EA9
379.582.5 EA10
379.591.19 EAII
379-581.19 EA12
379-592A EAU
379-582.3 EA14
379.581.20 EA15
379.581-21 EA16 275
379-582.2 EAU
379-592.1 EAIS
625 zz 48,750 0
,,i a . «r, 5 Br �r— I—nd
.1. 379-I31.1 11 300
379-551-13 12
379-131.5 13 330
379A31.6 14
379A31-7 15
379-531-12 17
379-061AI IS 350
379-061.1 110 450
379-061-29 111
379-061.3 112
379-MI-2 113 290
(1)PROJECT COST INCLUDES CONSTRUCTION COST PLUS AN ALLOWANCE OF 22%FOR ENGINEERING,INSPECTION,AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION.
a I I a I l I I I I I I I I I I I I
MASTER PLAN FOR ORANGE PARK ACRES SEWER SYSTEM
CONTRACT NO.7.19 CLASS"B-EASEMENT COST 24 (SIFT)
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7OF ORANGE COUNTY PROJECT COST 78 (SIM
2/23/94
OC-007-155-01
SERVICE TRUNK TOTALSEWER TOTALSEWER CLASS"A" CLASS"B" CLASS'B"
SEWER SEWER AREA SEWER REQUIREDPER REQUIRED PER EASEMENT EASEMENT PROJECT(1) EASEMENT
SERVICE SERVICE ASSESSOR LOT LENGTH SUB-AREA AREA LENGTH LENGTH COST COST
AREA SUB-AREA PARCELNO. NO. (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) S S
379.531-11 114
93452-13 115
379-501-7 116 390
379-5014 117
379.501-9 US 350
93452-17 119
93451-17 120
93452-16 121 370
93451-10 122
93451-I8 123
93451.7 124 720
93441-19 125
93441-17 126
93441-12 127 270
934514 128
3,810 297,180 0
'IA' 379-531-5 JAI 55
379-531-2 IA2
379-551-12 IA3
379-513.1 IA4 340
379-551-6 IA5
379-551-7 IA6
379-541-14 IA7 120
379-541-13 JAB
(1)PROJECT COST INCLUDES CONSTRUCTION COST PLUS AN ALLOWANCE OF 22%FOR ENGINEERING,INSPECTION,AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION.
-12-
MASTER PLAN FOR ORANGE PARK ACRES SEWER SYSTEM
CONTRACT NO.7-19 CLASS'B'EASEMENT COST 24 (SIFT)
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7 OF ORANGE COUNTY PROJECT COST 78 (SIFT)
N2394
OCC07-1554H
SERVICE TRUNK TOTALSEWER TOTALSEWER CLASS'A' CLASS'B' CLASS'B'
SEWER SEWER AREA SEWER REQUIRED PER REQUIRED PER EASEMENT EASEMENT PROJECT(1) EASEMENT
SERVICE SERVICE ASSESSOR LOT LENGTH SUB-AREA AREA LENGTH LENGTH COST COST
AREA SUB-AREA PARCEL NO. NO. (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FTJ (FT.) S S
379-541-12 IA9 175
379-541-11 IA10
379-541-10 1AII
379-531-3 IA12 145
379-351-8 IA13
935 65,130 0
'IC' 379-501.6 ICI 325
379-501.5 TC2
379.531-14 IC3
379-5314 TC4
379.531-8 TCS 380
379-531-7 IC6
379-531.6 IC7 75
780 60,840 0
'ICA' 379491-10 1CA1
379491-11 1CA2
379-5014 ]CAI
379-SOI-3 ICA4 400 345
400 31.200 0
'ID' 93452-12 IDI
379-061.7 TD2
3794)61-26 ID3 410
(1)PROJECT COST INCLUDES CONSTRUCTION COST PLUS AN ALLOWANCE OF 22%FOR ENGINEERING,INSPECTION,AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION.
t t ( t I 1 I I I t I I I t I I 1 I l
-13-
MASTER PLAN FOR ORANGE PARK ACRES SEWER SYSTEM
CONTRACT NO.7-I8 CLASS'B'EASEMENT COST 24
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7 OF ORANGE COUNTY PROJECT COST 78 (SLFT)
N23/94
OC-L'07-155-01
SERVICE TRUNK TOTALSEWER TOTALSEWER CLASS-A' CLASS'B' CLASS'B'
SEWER SEWER AREA SEWER REQUIRED PER REQUIRED PER EASEMENT EASEMENT PROJECT(1) EASEMENT
SERVICE SERVICE ASSESSOR LOT LENGTH SUB-AREA AREA LENGTH LENGTH COST COST
AREA SUB-AREA PARCELNO. NO. (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) TO (FT.) $ 4
379-061-25 ID4
379-0614 ID5 350 315
379-061-5 IDS
379-061-37 ID7
379-061-27 IDS 365 365
379.061-29 ID9 235 235
379-061-12 ID10
379-061-11 ID11
1,360 106,080 0
'IDA' 93452-20 IDAI 130
93.45E-19 IDA2
93452-18 IDA3 365 315
495 38,610 0
'IE' 93451-16 IEI 145
145 11,310 0
'IF' 93452-14 IFI
93452-15 IF2 395 360
395 30,810 0
e1G' 93451-19 IGI 420
9345141 IG2
93451-22 IG3
(1)PROJECT COST INCLUDES CONSTRUCTION COST PLUS AN ALLOWANCE OF 22%FOR ENGINEERING,INSPECTION,AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION.
-14-
MASTER PLAN FOR ORANGE PARK ACRES SEWER SYSTEM
CONFRACTNO.7-18 CLASS'B'EASEMENT COST 24 (SIFT)
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.70F ORANGE COUNTY PROJECT COST 78 ($/F )
223/94
OCC07-155-01
SERVICE TRUNK TOTALSEWER TOTAL SEWER CLASS"A' CLASS"B" CLASS"B"
SEWER SEWER AREA SEWER REQUIRED PER REQUIRED PER EASEMENT EASEMENT PROJECT(1) EASEMENT
SERVICE SERVICE ASSESSOR LOT LENGTH SUB-AREA AREA LENGTH LENGTH COST COST
AREA SUB-AREA PARCEL NO. NO. (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) UT.) (FT.) $ S
9345140 IG4 260 660
680 53,040 15,840
'IN' 93451-14 IHI 270 250
934514 I112 135 135
9345I-39 DO
93451-27 IH4
93451-33 IHS
93451-34 IH6
93451-31 1117 390 390
93451-29 IHS
79$ 62,010 0
WPM 77mm
'K' 379461-34 KI
379-061-39 K2
379-061-38 13 315 280
379-061-35 K4
3137WREN
1 77m 77 7,'E''>:
'M" 379-201-2 M4 230
379403-13 M5
379-203-8 M6
379-201-3 M7
379-2014 MS 435
(1)PROJECT COST INCLUDES CONSTRUCTION COST PLUS AN ALLOWANCE OF 22%FOR ENGINEERING,INSPECTION,AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION.
.,5.
MASTER PLAN FOR ORANGE PARK ACRES SEWER SYSTEM
CONTRACTNO.7-18 CLASS'B'EASEMENT COST 24 (S/FH
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7 OF ORANGE COUNTY PROJECT COST 78 (SIFT)
223/94
OC-007-155-01
SERVICE TRUNK TOTAL SEWER TOTALSEWER CLASS'A" CLASS"B' CLASS"B"
SEWER SEWER AREA SEWER REQUIREDPER REQUIREDPER EASEMENT EASEMENT PROJECT(l) EASEMENT
SERVICE SERVICE ASSESSOR LOT LENGTH SUB-AREA AREA LENGTH LENGTH COST COST
AREA SUB-AREA PARCELNO. NO. (FT.) (FT) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) S 9
379-201-5 M9
379-203-11 M10 230
995 69,810 0
379-203-3 MA2 600 570
379-203-4 MA3
379-203.5 MA4
379-203.9 MAS 350 350
379-203.10 MA6 300 300
1,250 97,500 0
'N' 379-06144 NI
3794161/3 N2
379461-32 N3 410
379412-1 N4
379411-3 NS 85
93441-19 N6
93M1-21 N7 280 230
379441-18 N8
93441-22 N9 390 150 240
93- 11-35 N10
93-441-38 N11
93- 11-37 NI2
93.441-27 N13
(1)PROJECT COST INCLUDES CONSTRUCTION COST PLUS AN ALLOWANCE OF 22%FOR ENGNEERING,INSPECTION,AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION.
-Ifi-
MASTER PLAN FOR ORANGE PARK ACRES SEWER SYSTEM
CON7RACTNO.7G8 CLASS"W EASEMENT COST 24 (SIFT)
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7 OF ORANGE COUNTY PROJECT COST 78 (SIFT)
2123/94
OC-007-155431
SERVICE TRUNK TOTALSEWER TOTAL SEWER CLASS'A' CLASS'B' CLASS"B'
SEWER SEWER AREA SEWER REQUIRED PER REQUIRED PER EASEMENT EASEMENT PROJECT(1) EASEMENT
SERVICE SERVICE ASSESSOR LOT LENGTH SUB-AREA AREA LENGTH LENGTH COST COST
AREA SUB-AREA PARCEL NO. NO. (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) S S
93441-26 NN 420 300
93441-29 N15 310 525
93452-II NIS 340 115
93452-8 HIT 100
93452-10 NIB
93452.9 N19 300 300
2,535 197,730 23,520
'NA' 3794114 NAI
379411-5 NA2 350
350 27,300 0
'NB' 93441-29 NB1 170
379461-31 N82 255
93441-25 NBD
93452-7 HIM
93441-23 NBS 360 305
785 61,230 0
'NC' 93441-33 NCI 200 200
379411.17 NC2
200 15,600 0
'ND' 93441.5 NDI 135 140
133 10,530 140
(1)PROJECT COST INCLUDES CONSTRUCTION COST PLUS AN ALLOWANCE OF 22%FOR ENGINEERING,INSPECTION,AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION.
-17-
MASTER PLAN FOR ORANGE PARK ACRES SEWER SYSTEM
CONTRACT NO.7.18 CLASS"B"EASEMENT COST 24 (E/FT)
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7 OF ORANGE COUNTY PROJECTCOST 78 (E/FT)
223/94
OC-007-155-01
SERVICE TRUNK TOTALSEWER TOTALSEWER CLASS'A' CLASS'B' CLASS"B-
SEWER SEWER AREA SEWER REQUIRED PER REQUIRED PER EASEMENT EASEMENT PROJECT(1) EASEMENT
SERVICE SERVICE ASSESSOR LOT LENGTH SUB-AREA AREA LENGTH LENGTH COST COST
AREA SUB-AREA PARCEL NO. NO. (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) E E
.0. 93443-35 OI 140
93443-10 02 440
379411.6 03
93443-24 04 155
379-0IIQ 05
93442.21 06 380
93442-20 07
93441-36 08
93442-14 09 230
93441-16 010
Oil
9344241 012 340
93442.E 013
934414 014 170
93441.3 015 120
93442-5 016
93442-3 017
93441-2 018
93442-2 019
934424 020 390
93451-1 021
93441-39 022
93442-22 023
2,365 194,470 0
'OA' 93443-36 OAI 255
93443.32 OA2 310 260
9344343 Om
(1)PROJECT COST INCLUDES CONSTRUCTION COST PLUS AN ALLOWANCE OF 22%FOR ENGINEERING,INSPECTION.AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION.
ae-
MASTER PLAN FOR ORANGE PARK ACRES SEWER SYSTEM
CONTRACT NO.7-19 CLASS'B'EASEMENT COST 24 (SIFT)
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7 OF ORANGE COUNTY PROJECTCOST 78 (SIFT)
2(23i94
OC-007-155A1
SERVICE TRUNK TOTALSEWER TOTALSEWER CLASS'A' CLASS'B' CLASS'B'
SEWER SEWER AREA SEWER REQUIRED PER REQUIRED PER EASEMENT EASEMENT PROJECT(1) EASEMENT
SERVICE SERVICE ASSESSOR LOT LENGTH SUB-AREA AREA LENGTH LENGTH COST COST
AREA SUB-AREA PARCEL NO. NO. (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) S $
9344347 OA4
9344349 OA5
9344348 OA6 325 325
890 69,420 0
.OB. 93443.23 OBI
934U-19 0132
93443-20 OB3 470 430
470 36,660 0
'OC' OCI
934 2.15 OC2 410 375
410 31,980 0
'OD' 93442-10 OD]
93442-18 OD2 500 460
93442-17 OD3
93442-19 OD4 200 200
700 54,600 0
'OE' 93442-8 OEI 320 300
934424 OE2
320 24,960 0
.P' 93443-25 P1 220
93443-37 P2 340 290
9344342 P3
(1)PROJECT COST INCLUDES CONSTRUCTION COST PLUS AN ALLOWANCE OF 22%FOR ENGINEERING,INSPECTION,AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION.
1 I 1 I 1 I I I I I I 1 1 I 1 I I I I
-19-
MASTER PLAN FOR ORANGE PARK ACRES SEWER SYSTEM
CONFRACTNO.7-IS CLASS'B"EASEMENT COST 24
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7 OF ORANGE COUNTY PROJECTCOST 78 (SIFT)
2/23194
OCC07-155-01
SERVICE TRUNK TOTAL SEWER TOTAL SEWER CLASS'A' CLASS"B" CLASS"B"
SEWER SEWER AREA SEWER REQUIRED PER REQUIRED PER EASEMENT EASEMENT PROJECT(1) EASEMENT
SERVICE SERVICE ASSESSOR LOT LENGTH SUB-AREA AREA LENGTH LENGTH COST COST
AREA SUB-AREA PARCEL NO. NO. (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) E E
9344341 P4
9344340 P5
93443-39 P6
93443-29 P7
93443-26 PB 330 330
9344345 P9
9344346 PIO
890 69,420 0
"PA' 93443-33 PAI 245
245 19,110 0
379-291-24 QI
379-291-25 Q2 350 290
379-281-26 Q3
379-281-27 Q4
379491-28 Q5
379-291-29 Q6 460 425
379-281-23 Q7 100
93443-34 Q8
93443-5 Q9 260 210
93443-22 Q10
93443-13 QII
9344342 Q12 275 275
93443-14 Q13
93443-21 Q14
93443-15 Q15 230 230
1.675
(1)PROJECT COST INCLUDES CONSTRUCTION COST PLUS AN ALLOWANCE OF 22%FOR ENGINEERING,INSPECTION,AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION.
l I l 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 [ 1 1 I 1 1 l
-to-
MASTER PLAN FOR ORANGE PARK ACRES SEWER SYSTEM
CONTRACTNO.7-18 CLASS'B'EASEMENT COST 24 (m)
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. OF ORANGE COUNTY PROJECT COST 78 (SIFT)
223/94
OC-007-1554J1
SERVICE TRUNK TOTALSEWER TOTALSEWER CLASS'A' CLASS'B' CLASS-B'
SEWER SEWER AREA SEWER REQUIRED PER REQUIRED PER EASEMENT EASEMENT PROJECTU) EASEMENT
SERVICE SERVICE ASSESSOR LOT LENGTH SUB-AREA AREA LENGTH LENGTH COST COST
AREA SUB-AREA PARCEL NO. NO. (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) S $
'R' 393-291-6 RI I00
393-291-7 R2
393-291.9 R3 210 230
'T' 393-292-1 TI
393-292.2 T2
393-292.3 T1 650
393-2924 T4
393-292.5 TS 360
393-292.6 T6
393-292.8 TB
393-291-1 T9
393-291-2 TIO
393.291.3 TH 265
393-2914 T12
393-292-5 T13 180
.U. 379.573.9 UI 245
379.573.10 U2
379491-9 U3
379-541-5 U4
379-54I-6 US
379-541.7 U6 395
379441-9 U7
379-441.10 US 520 475
379491-2 U9 340 150
(1)PROJECT COST INCLUDES CONSTRUCTION COST PLUS AN ALLOWANCE OF 22%FOR ENGINEERING,INSPECTION,AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION.
I t I t t t t t t
.21.
MASTER PLAN FOR ORANGE PARK ACRES SEWER SYSTEM
CONTRACT NO.7-18 CLASS'B'EASEMENT COST 24 (SM1'q
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7 OF ORANGE COUNTY PROJECT COST 78
2/23/94
OC-007-155-01
SERVICE TRUNK TOTAL SEWER TOTALSEWER CLASS'A' CLASS'B' CLASS'B'
SEWER SEWER AREA SEWER REQUIRED PER REQUIRED PER EASEMENT EASEMENT PROJECT(1) EASEMENT
SERVICE SERVICE ASSESSOR LOT LENGTH SUB-AREA AREA LENGTH LENGTH COST COST
AREA SUB-AREA PARCEL NO. NO. (FTJ (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) $ S
379441-5 UIO
379421-22 UII 230
379421-11 U12
379491.1 U13 26D
379491-I4 U14
379491-12 U15
379421-10 U16
379-501-2 U17
379-501.1 U18 31D
93451-12 U19
379421-9 U20 290
93451-11 U21
379421-8 U22 455 135
379421-7 U23
379441-20 U24 465 28D
3,210 250,390 3L920
'UA' 379-541.8 UA1 250
379-541.9 UA2 300
37949" Um
379-5314 UA4
379441-11 UAS
379441-19 UA6
550 42,900 0
'UB' 379441-8 UBI 260 75
3794414 UO2 370 340
379481-13 UO3 115 115 180
745 58,110 14.280
(1)PROJECTCOST INCLUDES CONSTRUCTION COST PLUS AN ALLOWANCE OF 22%FOR ENGINEERING,INSPECTION,AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION.
1 1 l [ 1 I [ [ 1 l [ [ 1 [ l [ t [ [
.22.
MASTER PLAN FOR ORANGE PARK ACRES SEWER SYSTEM
CONTRACT NO.7.18 CUSS-B'EASEMENT COST 24 (SIFT)
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.70F ORANGE COUNTY PROJECT COST 78 (SIFT)
2123/94
OC-007-155-01
SERVICE TRUNK TOTALSEWER TOTALSEWER CLASS'A' CLASS'B' CLASS"B'
SEWER SEWER AREA SEWER REQUIRED PER REQUIRED PER EASEMENT EASEMENT PROJECT(1) EASEMENT
SERVICE SERVICE ASSESSOR LOT LENGTH SUB-AREA AREA LENGTH LENGTH COST COST
AREA SUB-AREA PARCEL NO. NO. (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) I E
'UBA' 379441-7 UBAI 110 110
379441-6 UBA2
379441-3 UBA3
110 9.580 0
'UC" 379491-13 LIM
379491-7 UC2
379491-8 UC3
379.441-14 UC4
37944143 UC5 470
470 36,660 0
'UD' 379461-13 UDI
3794414 UD2
379481-14 UD3 490
379461.12 UD4
379481-15 UDS
379461-11 LIM
379461-2 UD7
379461-25 UD8
379461-10 UD9
3794614 UDIO
379461-9 UDII 530
1.020 79,560 0
'ODA' 379421-21 UDAI
379421-20 UDA2
379461-14 UDA3
(1)PROJECT COST INCLUDES CONSTRUCTION COST PLUS AN ALLOWANCE OF 22%FOR ENGINEERING,INSPECTION,AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION.
1 I 1 l 1 1 l ( i 1 l 1 1 ( 1 ( 1 ( [
-23-
MASTER PLAN FOR ORANGE PARK ACRES SEWER SYSTEM
CONTRACT NO.749 CLASS"B"EASEMENT COST 24
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7 OF ORANGE COUNTY PROJECTCOST 78 (E/FT)
223/94
OCL07-15541
SERVICE TRUNK TOTALSEWER TOTALSEWER CLASS"A' CLASS'B' CLASS-B-
SEWER SEWER AREA SEWER REQUIRED PER REQUIRED PER EASEMENT EASEMENT PROJECT(1) EASEMENT
SERVICE SERVICE ASSESSOR LOT LENGTH SUB-AREA AREA LENGTH LENGTH COST COST
AREA SUB-AREA PARCEL NO. NO. (FT) (FT.) (FTJ (FT.) (FT.) E E
379461-16 UDA4 405 380
379461-17 UDAS
379421-31 UDA6
379421-30 UDA7
379-161-33 UDAS 445 445
850 66,300 0
'11E' 379421-12 UEI
379421-14 UE2 595 570
379421-13 UE3
595 46,410 0
'V" 379451-21 VI 310 270
379451-20 V2
379461-20 V3 325 325
379481-1 V4 450 450
1,085
'WA' 379-551-10 WAI 455 410
379-551-9 WA3
455 35,490 9,940
"WB" 379-561-7 Will 180 150
379-5614 WB2.
180 14,N0 3,600
4W V7 77771,,,445
(1)PROJECT COST INCLUDES CONSTRUCTION COST PLUS AN ALLOWANCE OF 22%FOR ENGINEERING,INSPECTION,AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION.
.24.
MASTER PLAN FOR ORANGE PARK ACRES SEWER SYSTEM
CONTRACT NO.7-I8 CLASS'B'EASEMENT COST 24 (SIFT)
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7 OF ORANGE COUNTY PROJECT COST 78 (SIFT)
2/23194
OC.007-155-01
SERVICE TRUNK TOTALSEWER TOTALSEWER CLASS'A' CLASS-B' CLASS'B'
SEWER SEWER AREA SEWER REQUIREDPER REQUIRED PER EASEMENT EASEMENT PROJECT(1) EASEMENT
SERVICE SERVICE ASSESSOR LOT LENGTH SUB-AREA AREA LENGTH LENGTH COST COST
AREA SUB-AREA PARCELNO. NO. (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) S S
TOTAL SEWER REQUIRED FOR DISTRICT 39,035 12,915 4,995 $3,044,730 $119.MO
(U PROJECT COST INCLUDES CONSTRUCTION COST PLUS AN ALLOWANCE OF 22%FOR ENGINEERING,INSPECTION,AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION.
r
r
MASTER PLAN FOR
THE COWAN HEIGHTS
r
SEWER SYSTEM
r
Contract No. 7-19
Wee
County Sanitation District
No. 7 of Orange County
..
r
QPOFES Sin
N
e`°� EUGENEg q�f
rEncyneerincl
No.C17714
• • • .:6!30N7
r fq Vll� �1
OF CAUFOQ'
Newpon Beach.CA 92658-9020
r
r
OCTOBER 1994
OC-007-155-00
r
County Sanitation District Number 7 of Orange County
COWAN HEIGHTS SEWER PLAN
r
OCTOBER 1994
1 GENERAL
Cowan Heights is an unincorporated area in the County of Orange encompassed by the City of Orange
r
from the north,the City of Tustin from the east,and Lemon Heights(another unincorporated area)from
the south. The study area is made up of approximately 171 acres and is located southeast of Newport
r
Blvd, north of Sirrine and Deerhill Drive,and southwest of Peters Canyon Regional Park. The terrain is
r hilly with steep areas to the south near Clearview Lane. Public roads provide access to nearly all of the
homes in the area and may not follow contour patterns.
The sewer study has identified 165 parcel lots that will require construction of various sewers to outfalls
in order to be serviced. Of the 165 parcel lots, 10 are undeveloped.
II TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING
Topographic mapping of the study area was flown on July 9, 1991 and prepared by Rattray&Associates
r
Inc. The study area was mapped with 2-foot contour intervals showing curbs and gutters,street striping,
,r existing homes,trees, swimming pools,and various other structures. The maps are stored on ten digital
floppy disks in the micro-station format.
Property lines,public and private access road easements,right-of-way,and centerline information was
obtained from record of surveys,recorded tract and parcel maps and have been mapped in micro-station
format and superimposed on the topographic base maps. Existing sewers have been mapped from sewer
atlases and construction drawings with invert elevations shown. With the use of micro-station,the base
maps can be printed out to any scale. The aerial photographs were flown for 1"=40'base map
reproduction which is the scale recommended for concoction drawings.
r
r
III PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING
A. Drainage
general drainage pattern for a large portion of the study area that is east of Rangeview Drive is
southeast toward the City of Tustin. The remaining study area which is west of Rangeview Drive drains
` north toward the City of Orange with the exception of one small portion of area that drains south into
County Sanitation facilities(see service area"C"on sewer plan figure). A ridge line located along Brier
r
Lane splits three service areas in the northwest and southeast directions and the high point of the study
area is located in the southern portion of the study area near Clearview Lane.
B. Sewage System Preliminary Design
The study area was subdivided into four main sewer service areas with twenty-three sub-service areas
and four proposed trunk systems. Each proposed trunk system connects to a nearby existing trunk outfall
owned either by the City of Orange,the County Sanitation District(local sewers),or the Harvard Avenue
r Trunk(HAT). The HAT trunk is owned by the Irvine Ranch Water District(IRWD).
` There are twenty-seven trunks and subtrunks to the main systems which have parcels assigned to them.
The trunks and subtrunks are coded alphabetically in a clockwise manner. Parcel lot assignments are
also coded alphabetically to the particular letter code of the trunk or subtrunk to which the house lateral
r will ultimately connect to for sewer service.
Parcel lots that are within the study area and have direct access to an existing sewer, owned by the City
r
of Orange or the Sanitation District,are part of the "BK"system(see Sewer Plan Figure near intersection
of Cowan Heights Drive and Brier Lane). These lots should be excluded from the study and thus from
any proposed assessment district. The Sanitation Districts policy permits direct connections to trunks or
�+ subtrunks up to and including 24 inches in diameter and likewise the City of Orange and the IRWD will
permit connections to their sewers subject to meeting their requirements.
COWAN HEIGHTS SEWER PLAN -2- OCTOBER ISN
r
r Sewer service area "A" is located in the southeast portion of the study area and drains toward the east
into the HAT trunk which eventually drains into Sanitation District No. 14. Sewer service areas"B"and
r
"D"are located in the northwest portion of the study area and drain north into a sewer owned by the City
of Orange. This outfall is located near the intersection of Skylark Place and Newport Blvd. Sewer
service area"C",which is also located in the northwest portion of the study area,drains south into the
County Sanitation facilities.
.y This sewer plan was developed to operate as an "all gravity system"for the entire study area, so some
sewers had to be located along the side property lines due to irregular topography. The "A"and "B.'
trunks are such examples. It should be noted that maintenance where vehicular access is not feasible,
small portable equipment may need to be carried to the site. But since most of the sewers in these areas
will have a steep slope with corresponding high flow velocities,the required maintenance should be less
frequent than normally experienced.
r
C. Easements
Full implementation of the sewer plan will require acquisition of 58 separate permanent easements over
s private property and private access roads. Four of these easements lie in private roads serving more than
one property and are noted as Class "A"easements on the data spreadsheet. It is assumed that Class "A"
easements will be dedicated free of charge to the District as the various sewer projects develop. This has
.. been the ease for similar projects located in District No. 7, such as the Lemon Heights project.
The other 54 permanent easements are located along the side or rear property lines of individual lots.
r
They are required because of the topographic relationship to the various drainage areas. These
easements are noted as Class"B" on the data spreadsheet. As in the past,easements in similar projects in
District No. 7 have been dedicated free of charge. Also note that easements through Peters Canyon
e. Regional Park were classified as Class"B"easements and will need to be acquired from the County of
Orange for the "A"and "B"trunk system(see Sewer Plan Figure).
It should be noted that some temporary construction easements may be required,although they cannot be
r identified at this time. Usually,there is no or minimal cost associated with such temporary easements.
COWAN HEIGHTS SEWER PLAN 3 OCTOBER 1994
r
IV DATA SHEETS
r Lot assignments to specific trunks and subtrunks as noted on the topographic sewer study map are
presented in tabular form on the data spreadsheet. The Orange County Assessor's parcel number for each
r lot is also given with each lot identification number. Trunk sewer lengths posted apply to the length of
r line in the public and private roads,and to proposed sewers that are adjacent or cut across private
property. Class "A"easements lengths apply to sewer lengths that are in private access roads and Class
"B" casements apply to lengths that are in private property. All lengths are approximate and will be
refined in the final design.
V PROJECT COST&CLASS "W EASEMENTS COST
Project cost and Class "B"easement cost are estimated for each sewer service area and are included on
r the data spreadsheet. The project costs are based on a$78 per lineal foot of sewer,that includes
construction costs plus an allowance of 22 percent for engineering, inspection,construction surveying,
and contract administration. Class "B"easements are based on a 20-foot wide permanent easement at a
cost of a$1.20 per square foot. This criteria is in accordance with the District staffs recommendation.
Other costs associated with implementation of the sewer system, such as annexation and connection fees,
assessment district costs, and homeowner costs are not included in the project costs. The total project
and Class "B" easement costs arc$2.7 million and$470 thousand respectively.
For those sewer service areas which have sub-service areas,the costs are further broken down for each
sub-service area(see data spreadsheet at the end of this report). In some of the large service areas,such
as Area"A"there are Considerable possibilities for Constmetion projects independent of the entire service
area. Project size can influence the construction cost,since usually the larger the project the lower the
unit costs. The costs identified on the data spreadsheets where there are sub-service areas are average
r
costs for the entire service area and are not indicative for any particular project that might be split off
r
from the whole area.
COWAN HEIGHTS SEWER PLAN -0- OCTOSER 19M
r
Other situations where asub-service area might be the initial project occur in regard to financing the
construction of an "outfall trunk" serving the entire service area. As an example,take the case of the
r
sub-service area"AA". Assume it is the first project in the"A"service area and lots AAl and AA7 wish
r to form an assessment district or proceed with a cash up front project. Outfall trunk"A"which connects
to the HAT trunk would have to be constructed up to the junction of the"AA"subtrunk. The cost of the
r outfall "A"trunk would be split equally between lots AA I through AA7 and the remaining costs for the
"AA"trunk would also be split equally since the benefit received for each lot is identical,namely sewer
service for a residential lot. However,in the future,as upstream lots build sewers which discharge into
r outfall trunk"A",reimbursement to the initial AA through AA7 lot owners should be made on prorated
basis taking into account the number of lots served by the outfall portion of the"A"trunk. As properties
�+ are sewered upstream of the"A"trunk,they pay for their own construction cost equally(same benefit
received)and the initial property owners on"AA"are not reimbursed for their"AA"subtrunk costs to
r
sewer their lots.
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
COWAN HEIGHTS SEWER PLAN -S OCTOBER 1994
r
MASTER PLAN FOR THE COWAN HEIGHTS SEWER SYSTEM
CONTRACTNO.7.19 CLASS"B"EASEMENTCOST 24 (SIFT)
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7 OF ORANGE COUNTY PROJECT COST 78
1014/94
OC-007.155-M
SERVICE TRUNK TOTALSEWER TOTALSEWER CLASS'A' CLASS'B. CLASS'B'
SEWER SEWER AREA SEWER REQUIRED PER REQUIRED PER EASEMENT EASEMENT PROJECT(1) EASEMENT
SERVICE SERVICE ASSESSOR LOT LENGTH SUB-AREA AREA LENGTH LENGTH COST COST
AREA SUB-AREA PARCELNO. NO. (PT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) S $
'A' 503-241-6 AI 1090 logo
503-241-1 A2 350 350
503-241-5 A3
503-241-2 A4 380
503-2414 A5
503-241-3 A6 590 210
503-271-7 A7
503-271.6 A8 200 340
503-2714 A9
503-271-5 AN 290
503-211.9 All
503-271-10 Al2
503-2714 A13 300
503-271-11 A14 750 400
503-271-12 AIS 430
503-271-19 A16 430 390
503-271-17 A17
503-194-18 AIS 690 680
503-194-22 A19 330 330
503-194-7 A20 320 320
503-194-36 A21 560
503-194-37 A22
503-121-36 A23
503-121-2 A24 560
503-121-37 A25
(1)PROJECT COST INCLUDES CONSTRUCTION COST PLUS AN ALLOWANCE OF 22%FOR ENGINEERING,INSPECTION,AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION.
I t [ ( I I I I I I I I I I I I I I [
-7-
MASTER PLAN FOR THE COWAN HEIGHTS SEWER SYSTEM
CONTRACT NO.7-19 CLASS'B'EASEMENT COST 24 (SIM
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7 OF ORANGE COUNTY PROJECT COST 78 Mn)
10/4/94
OC-007-155-00
SERVICE TRUNK TOTAL SEWER TOTALSEWER CLASS'A' CLASS'B' CLASS"B"
SEWER SEWER AREA SEWER REQUIRED PER REQUIREDPER EASEMENT EASEMENT PROJECT(1) EASEMENT
SERVICE SERVICE ASSESSOR LOT LENGTH SUB-AREA AREA LENGTH LENGTH COST COST
AREA SUB-AREA PARCEL NO. NO. (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) f f
503-121-23 A26
503-121-39 A27 620
6,340 4%.S20 121,690
503-261-5 AAI 410 410
503-2614 AA2 370 370
503-261.3 AA3 530
503-261.2 AA4 530 320
503.261-1 AA5
503-261-13 AA6
503-261-14 AA7 47D
1,79D 139,940 39,120
'AM' 503-261-10 AAA[ 270
503-261-11 AAA2 250
503-261-12 AAA3 200
470 3600 6,000
503-241-15 ABI
503-241-9 AIR
503-241-10 AB3 370 360
503-241.14 AB4 220 330
503-241-12 AB5 400 70
503-242-3 AB6 100
503-242-2 AB7
(1)PROJECT COST INCLUDES CONSTRUCTION COST PLUS AN ALLOWANCE OF 22%FOR ENGINEERING,INSPECTION,AND CONTRACT ADMIMSTRATION.
_6.
MASTER PLAN FOR THE COWAN HEIGHTS SEWER SYSTEM
CONTRACFNO.7-19 CLASS'B'EASEMENT COST 24 ($IFT)
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7 OF ORANGE COUNTY PROJECT COST 78 (SIFT)
HIM"
OC-007-155-00
SERVICE TRUNK TOTALSEWER TOTALSEWER CLASS A' CLAM'B' CLASS-R'
SEWER SEWER AREA SEWER REQUIRED PER REQUIRED PER EASEMENT EASEMENT PROJECT(1) EASEMENT
SERVICE SERVICE ASSESSOR LOT LENGTH SUB-AREA AREA LENGTH LENGTH COST COST
AREA SUB-AREA PARCEL NO. NO. (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) S $
503-271-23 ABS 540
503-231-8 AB9 580
1.610 130.260 31,200
'ABA' 503-242-1 ABA] 420
503-271-22 ABA2 600
503-271-21 ARM
503-27I-20 ABM
503-271-19 ABAS 340
1,360 106,080 0
-ABB' 503-171-1 ABBI
503.171-5 ABB2 260
503-172-1 ABB3
260 20,290 0
'AC' 503-2614 ACI 360
503-261-8 AC2
503-261.7 AC3 470
503-2614 AC4 680
503-261-2 AC5
503-261-1 AC6 230
503-2814 AC7 330
503-291-8 ACS 370
503-291-7 AC9
(1)PROJECT COST INCLUDES CONSTRUCTION COST PLUS AN ALLOWANCE OF 22%FOR ENGINEERING,INSPECTION,AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION.
-9-
MASTER PLAN FOR THE COWAN HEIGHTS SEWER SYSTEM
CONTRACT NO.7.19 CLASS'B'EASEMENT COST 24 (SIFT)
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7OFORANGECOUNTY PROJECT COST 78 (m)
1014/94
OCC07-155410
SERVICE TRUNK TOTAL SEWER TOTALSEWER CLASS'A" CLASS'B' CLASS"B"
SEWER SEWER AREA SEWER REQUIRED PER REQUIRED PER EASEMENT EASEMENT PROJECT(I) EASEMENT
SERVICE SERVICE ASSESSOR LOT LENGTH SUB-AREA AREA LENGTH LENGTH COST COST
AREA SUB-AREA PARCELNO. NO. 07.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) E E
503-2824 ACID 550
503-282-5 AC11 300
503-194-1 AC12 400
503-194-2 ACLI
503-292-4 AC14 700
503-194.3 AC15
503-292-5 AC16
5034944 AC17
503-194-5 ACIS 510
503-121-1 AC19
503-121-3 AC20 420
5,320 414,960 0
'ACA" 503-261-I5 ACAI
503-261-16 ACA2
503-261.5 ACAS 320
320 24,960 0
"AE" 503-271-3 AEI 220
503-271-2 AE2 190
503-271-1 AE3 410
410 31,980 9,840
'Al" 503-271-13 AN 270
503-271-16 AF2
(1)PROJECT COST INCLUDES CONSTRUCTION COST PLUS AN ALLOWANCE OF 22%FOR ENGINEERING,INSPECTION,AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION.
I I I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
a o-
MASTER PLAN FOR THE COWAN HEIGHTS SEWER SYSTEM
CONTRACT NO.7-19 CLASS'B'EASEMENT COST 24 (SIM
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7 OF ORANGE COUNTY PROJECTCOST 78 (m)
1014/94
OC-007-155-00
SERVICE TRUNK TOTAL SEWER TOTALSEWER CLASS'A' CLASS-B' CLASS'B'
SEWER SEWER AREA SEWER REQUIRED PER REQUIRED PER EASEMENT EASEMENT PROJECT(1) EASEMENT
SERVICE SERVICE ASSESSOR LOT LENGTH SUB-AREA AREA LENGTH LENGTH COST COST
AREA SUB-AREA PARCEL NO. NO. (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) f f
503-271-15 AF3
503-271.14 AF4 350 290
503-282-9 AFS
503-282-10 AF6
503-282-2 AF7 300 300
503-282-7 AFB
503.282-8 AF9
920 71,760 0
'B' 503-321-13 BI 2570 23"
503.281-1 B2 730
503.291-1 B3 $40
503-312-1 B4 520
503-291-7 B5
503-312-10 B6 340 300
503.292-1 B7
503-301-2 B8
503.301-1 89 530 500
503-2926 B10
503-301-11 B11 290
503-301-10 B12 570 270
503-301.9 B13 420
503-3014 B14
(1)PROJECT COST INCLUDES CONSTRUCTION COST PLUS AN ALLOWANCE OF 22%FOR ENGINEERING,INSPECTION,AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION.
MASTER PLAN FORTHE COWAN HEIGHTS SEWER SYSTEM
CONTRACT NO.7.19 CLASS"B'EASEMENT COST 24 (SIFT)
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7 OF ORANGE COUNTY PROJECTCOST 78 (SIFT)
10/4/94
GCCB7.155.00
SERVICE TRUNK TOTALSEWER TOTALSEWER CLASS'A' CLASS-8- CLASS"B-
SEWER SEWER AREA SEWER REQUIRED PER REQUIRED PER EASEMENT EASEMENT PROJECT(1) EASEMENT
SERVICE SERVICE ASSESSOR LOT LENGTH SUB-AREA AREA LENGTH LENGTH COST COST
AREA SUBAREA PARCEL NO. NO. (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) E E
503-301.5 BIS 150
503-301-8 B16 560 140
503-301.7 B17
503-30" BIB I50
5,990 467,220 119,520
'BA' 503-281-2 BAI 350 350
503-281-3 BA2 580
503-2814 BA3
503-281.6 BA4
503-281-5 SAS 580
930 72,540 22,320
'BB' 503-321-12 BBI "0 440
503-321.5 BB2 550
503-3214 BB3 550
503-321.7 BB4
990 77,220 23,760
'BC' 503-291-2 BCI 560
503-291-3 BC2
503-2914 BC3 290 270
503-291.5 BC4
950 66,300 6,490
(1)PROJECT COST INCLUDES CONSTRUCTION COST PLUS AN ALLOWANCE OF 22%FOR ENGINEERING,INSPECTION,AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION.
l t 1 1 l l 1 1 1 l I 1 l 1 1 8 l 1 1
-Ix-
MASTER PLAN FOR THE COWAN HEIGHTS SEWER SYSTEM
CONTRACTNO.7-19 CLASS'B'EASEMENT COST 24 (SIM
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7 OF ORANGE COUNTY PROJECT COST 78 (TAUT
1014/94
GCCo7-155-00
SERVICE TRUNK TOTAL SEWER TOTAL SEWER CLASS*A' CLASS'B' CLASS'B'
SEWER SEWER AREA SEWER REQUIREDPER REQUIRED PER EASEMENT EASEMENT PROJECT(1) EASEMENT
SERVICE SERVICE ASSESSOR LOT LENGTH SUB-AREA AREA LENGTH LENGTH COST COST
AREA SUB-AREA PARCEL NO. NO. (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) E E
'BD' 503-321-II BDI
503-321-10 BD2
503.321.9 BD3
503-312-2 BD4 360
503-321-8 BDS
503-312-3 BD6 560
503-312.12 BD7 270
503-312-II BDS 450 140
503-312-9 BD9
503-312-8 9010 240
503-312-5 BD11
503-312-7 BD12 420 180
503-3I2.6 BD13
1,790 139,620 19,920
'BE' 503.291.6 BEI 220 220
220 17,160 5,280
'BF" 503-292-2 BFI 415
503-292-3 BF2
415 32,370 0
-BG' 503-301-3 BO1 330
330 25,740 0
(1)PROJECT COST INCLUDES CONSTRUCTION COST PLUS AN ALLOWANCE OF 22%FOR ENGINEERING,INSPECTION,AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION.
-13-
MASTER PLAN FORTHE COWAN HEIGHTS SEWER SYSTEM
CONTRACT NO.7.19 CLASS'B'EASEMENT COST 24 (SIFT)
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7 OF ORANGE COUNTY PROJECT COST 78 (SIFT)
10/4N4
OCC07-155-00
SERVICE TRUNK TOTAL SEWER TOTALSEWER CLASS'A' CLASS'B' CLASS'0'
SEWER SEWER AREA SEWER REQUIRED PER REQUIRED PER EASEMENT EASEMENT PROJECT(1) EASEMENT
SERVICE SERVICE ASSESSOR LOT LENGTH SUB-AREA AREA LENGTH LENGTH COST COST
AREA SUB-AREA PARCEL NO. NO. (FT.) (FT) (FT.) (FT.) (FTJ f f
-BH' 503-292-7 BHI 390 340
503-302.5 BIG
390 0 8,160
'11' 503.302-3 B11 350 310
503-302-2 1112
$03-302-1 B13 240
590 46,020 7.440
.BK. 503-121-5 BKI
503-3032 BK2
503-112-1 BK3
503-112-2 BK4
0 0 0
973.830 212.880
'C' 503-591-1 CI
503.581-3 C2 490 330
503-5814 C3 350
503-311.6 C4
503-311-19 CS 470 320
503-58" C6
503-311-17 C7
503-311-16 CS
(H PROJECT COST INCLUDES CONSTRUCTION COST PLUS AN ALLOWANCE OF 22%FOR ENGINEERING,INSPECTION,AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION.
-14-
MASTER PLAN FOR THE COWAN HEIGHTS SEWER SYSTEM
CONTRACT NO.7.19 CLASS'B'EASEMENT COST 24 (SIFT)
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7 OF ORANGE COUNTY PROJECT COST 78 (SIFT)
1N4M
OCL07-1554 0
SERVICE TRUNK TOTAL SEWER TOTALSEWER CLASS'A' CLASS-B' CLASS'R.
SEWER SEWER AREA SEWER REQUIRED PER REQUIRED PER EASEMENT EASEMENT PROJECT(1) EASEMENT
SERVICE SERVICE ASSESSOR LOT LENGTH SUB-AREA AREA LENGTH LENGTH COST COST
AREA SUB-AREA PARCEL NO. NO. (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (FT.) (Fr.) S f
503-311-I9 C9 150
503-31[A CIO
1,310 IO2,I d0 I9.200
'CA' 503-311-1 CAI 250 250
250 19,500 6.000
WPM
'D' M3-5814 DI
503-5916 m 1160
503-591-5 D3
303-321-2 DI 360 340
503-321-I US
1,520 118.560 8,160
'DA' 503-321-14 DAI 660
503-321-15 DA2
503-3214 DA3 670
670 32.260 15.940
TOTAL SEWER REQUIRED FOR DISTRICT 35.095 1,140 19.590 $2.736,630 5469,920
(H PROJECT COST INCLUDES CONSTRUCTION COST PLUS AN ALLOWANCE OF 22%FOR ENGINEERING,INSPECTION,AND CONTRACT ADMMISTRATION.
SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
DISTRICTS'ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
REGULAR MEETING
JULY 26, 1995-7:30 P.M.
RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 3
Minute excerpts have been received as set forth below. Pursuant to Regular Agenda Item
No. 3, it is appropriate to receive and file said excerpts:
(3) (a) DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpt from the City of
Seal Beach re election of mayor and appointment of alternate Director to the
Mayor and seating a new member of the Board: ('Mayor)
Active Director Alternate Director
George Brown Marilyn Bruce Hastings'
(b) Consideration of motion to receive and file any minute excerpts received subsequent
to preparation of supplemental agenda, if any
BACKGROUND ORGANIZATION RESTRUCTURING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT F
The County Sanituon Districts of Orange County I aUnces)is a publicly owned BUDGET FORMAT The budget format was also improved this year,and now The appointment of a new General Manager in fiscal year 1994-95 was the Because wastewater flow projections far I
wastewater treatment agency Nat provides sewage collection,treatment and includes a broad Overview of the crevices financial condition:a complete listing of working Point for a major restructuring of the Sanitbon District and the decreased form the projected 319 relief it
disposal services for approximately 2,24 million people In central and northwest fiscal policies(along with a checklist to verify our compliance stWst Me major beginning of a navy eirst of Improvement,As part of this ms"ctunng.the Joint to Poll estimates of 275 mgd(a 13.5
Orange County.The Districts operate and maintain the third largest fecilivas of assumptions used W develop the proposed revenues and expanses: and division Boards approved the morgamemice of Me Districts'rep management team and improvement projects called for in the Me
Moir kind on the West Coast Financed by service and connection fees, retrainee that include orgenizadon charts,stiffing trends,seMce descriptions, established eem Assiseen[General Manager positions to oversee Operations and reevalualetl.
property tax revenues, investment interest and barorwing,Me Districts' performance measures and results.seem brands and budget summaries. Administration.Adtliaonal major changes for 1995-96 include:
financial management program includes the following: The performance measures for 1995-96 also have a Guenuteme Results As a result of We powndal losses from th
OJeint Works and Individual District Capital Facilities Budgets section Net is designed W provide a method of measuring actual results. O Rearganizing Maintenance and Operauons into two separate nurtured decreases in projected wastes
OJaint Works and Individual District Operations The Capital Ducey Revolving Fund(CaRFI illustrated project bookie[is also departments. capital Improvement budget has been red
and Maintenance Budgets included aloe with individual project could sheet W help Me reader better pert nt fropercem
(rem993-8 ion ere budget of$
g g P I P O and All lung the Compliance.Conservation,Recycle and Reuse, percent from the 199394 budget of$]C
O Debt Servicing understand the nature and need of the necessary capital improvements. and Air Quality Divisions of the Technical Services Department into
The Joint Works budget includes all miminenho on,operators,maintenance the Environmental Management Division. A critical and com,Mha,O.rerv.of tM
and copse facilities costs that benefit all Districts. fiscal year to determine the race a[which
O Evablishrng tenor separate divisions for the planning and design improvements during the next 5 years.
HIGHLIGHTS �I fir PERFORMANCE MEASURES functions within the Engineering Department.
QUANTIFYING OUR EFFORTS The Oiaticts have historically provided O Transforming tithe Information Services Deal which used W be a
Fiscal year 1994 95 was particularly nouewal be apse of wastewater collector,treatment and dispose)services at Me lowest possible part of the Finance Department Ina,Me Information Technology
Me Orange County Investment Pool(OCIPI in December and subsequent coat,while still maintaining our commitment W balanced WWI environmentl Department. TRAINING AND STAFF DE1
d effiration of bankruptcy by the County of Orange.The Oistice;had$454 management.A good way W evaluate him well we're doing is W compare our
million invested in the OCIP et the tlma and have recovered approximately O Transferring the Department
payroll Finance
announce from the Human
vetted operation and maintenance noses per million gallonsLion of M weetwaelr Resources Oe arunent W the Finance Department. Unqugh unavbfy,the easiest way W Changr
$341 million as fiscal year 1995-96 begins. It is hoped Mat the balance of created with other agencies.According W Ma Association of Metropolitan p p NmugM1 terming.Trials paruculeAy roue a
$113 million will be paid over time through recovery claims and potential Sawerage Agencies(AMSAI 1993 survey of wen 100 other wastewater O Establishing a Treining.Safety and Emergency Response O'vision
of the melon goals of the lap a is topriem
mpron,
proceeds from liugauon,but the eventual settlement is uncar[ein, treatment agencies nationwide.the Districts'19941995 average cost of$538 within Human Resources. during 199596 is W tlevelop a comprehe
Other major budget developments Involved the hiring of a new General ...in the lowest 15 Percent. needs of our employees in all poets of We
O Centralizing the functions of public roll editing and writing
and subsequent reorganization changes,including the asWblishmen[ This cosepermillion gallons of wastewater ueattl performance measure Is a support,graphic services,multimedia services,the receptionist, During their review of Human Resources,
of two Assistant General Manager positions,the eppidnorne nt of tithe Director tangible indicator of how well we're keeping '
of Finance ae the Districts'Treasure[the development of our own investment g Ping coats tlwvn,end gives us an the mailroom, and printing and reproeneral services o anew Erns[ o Young recommended rhst more t
policy,Nee i pellet out
in BENCHMARK Nat we can use ie sae if the performance measures Communiceuons Division within the General Managers office. areas of salary.technical and manegemer
p ry, ents. and a of an independent expanded
outside money manager W M1erMle spelled am
the budget(and the results achieved)Op for each tlts by M department and
our investments, and enhanced and expended controls over raeM1 division are working.Dividing the budgeted Joint,Operating costa by the Other major arganizatienel changes include privatizing security services,with the In 199495,the Olsmet budgeted$1]`
management, assignment of 24hourpe"er,security contact administration placed with We WWI salaries.According W the American
ptafecetl flow for g M man yields a cue[For million gallons of$$638fins However,
During 199495,the public accounting antl consulting fine of Ernst 6 Young stall will be working W manage un511etl poatlone and elective expenses W reduce Operations Department.and Me addition of four new analyst Feathers placed Development(ASTO),many of the netioni
conducted several review project.The renews included a Performance this figure W a target cunt of$599 per million gallons.Stiff will continue W play throughout the pN.M.uo, companies spend 2 percent of payroll on
Measurement Assessment,and separate evaluations of Operations and the key roll in keeping also figure as low as Feasible.Figure A shows the recommends an ultimate goal of 4 pereer
Maintenance.Finance,Human Resources,and our capital improvement District'everege cos[of processing one million gallons of wastewaer for each of TREASURY MANAGEMENT training 30 Percent of its employees.
process. Many of the recommendations Wet came from these reviews the lest five years. Including Me budgeted and target goals for 1995-96.
became the foundauon for some of Nee roved budget requests and Until the County bankruptcy,the County Treasurer also served as the Dlseicts' Based on the above findings,recommend
PP 9 q 199596 budget regent a Well veining I
Improvement approved for fiscal War 19fil discussed later in this Figure A Treasurer end managed OCI )Me As aar Idle cash and resurvey within the Orange approximstly 2 P.M..of t.I salaries.
pamphlet. HISTORICAL COST PEA MILLION GALLONS TREATED settlement,
Investment Pool with
the
As a result Ot the bankruptcy ray and subsequent
�r $�.. seWamerrc agreement with the County,the Oietricta M1ave received BD percent
1995-96 BUDGET HIGHLIGHTS of their investment balance of December 6, 1994,or$341 million.Since
C WK December 6.Me District have made the following changes W Me Treasury
BUDGET PROCESS This wa s'proposed budget was sueatnfined through sate management functions'.
a one-step submittal and approval process,making it easier for each Director
and each District W understand the bottarl impact of the joint operating ass. $a.. $a.. ass O Appointed the Director of Finance as the District Treasurer
and cap till budget on each Districts budget before May approved the Joint $519
Wart budget, In prior years,this wee a Avostp process In which the joint $. O Created it owes Investment policy
operating and capial budget recommendations were first prepared and sae O Expanded and enhanced Internal controls over cash management
approved by the Joint Boards.Nan allocated W the individual District budgets
for approval and steepen.This years'user friendl t budge[Is the most $ OO M25 O Appointed an outside money manager W assist in the development of
comprehensive document Of it kind we have ever produced, and is designed 1.91 1992 1993 1994 1995 199e the DistYCW'lnvesurent pordello
W be an important resource and planning pool.
2 3 4
MDITURES
G FUND (table 1) JOINT WORKS OPERATING FUND [table 2] Figure S ALL DISTRICTS' SUMMARY BUDGET
ttITN Fuss'la G 3shass TOTAL FIINdNG Uses
Approved Budget 1995-96 Approved Budget $461,e1s.GaG s461.e,s.p9G
1995-96 Detail Total Comparisons by Department Ig.. m. ase�® Iv Ton' E ^9
t99495 t99S96 531et66 ttll
tAitus 199M1H5 ahvini t99S96 BW9ttM �° fi6.as
Pr.ieccea 4ppra,.a 9aP4mnanF 4cru.l eua9a Pr4iawa 4PPmrea enarN4
:ITS Ga...ell 878.924 1,659,900 1.662.000 1.638AQ1 n 24%1
auman Peap,wa 756.055 1,126,500 LIXM.OL 1.423.0010 25325fi
$29,100.00 $32,283,e00 mance 2,483.187 2.wGuard 2,245,60 3352,300 16$3% 6pin,vnp Peca' 1JR6
vee
615800 7.684,000 almmv,w Taclmolcgy 1,146,921 1.58%300 1,289,000 1.551.603 e59% as.a.,CW
a 35.258.00 39,967,000 "^a'^,a^.^u 13,435,056 15.M.® 14,4x,000 15,i2oJm I0.01%1 phtj •, Downs—
Opa'aoone Ii601.211 15 .BR] 1419L.IX 24.IA.3W 52)Tb 71 - .32721
[6.000,000) 06,875,0001 Tanta Ss,,caa 140ali 14.536.200 14,700 m.000 10.1 ,Bm 130.4e%1 s�7cssoma 3'as
13.600,0000 (4,425,000) 6,anserne 490.703 379,600 494,3010 7e4.sm 106.lrw 102%
SANITARY SEWER SERVICE COSTS The DieMcts' sm,leJemily property
[8,800.0001 [11,300,p00I Iese J..RwENOES 13,620,1641 I3700,C4o1 13,675.000) 13.e00.000) tam: owners saniary sewer service fees average about$71 per year and are among
U. 25,458,Op0 28,667,000 NET J.o,EXPENSES 45.180.264 49.542,0o0 47ugM.Cm p000 S4.3• $11% We
lowest In California,which has an average rare d$184,80 according to a ep1s18tas
1994 survey Thee.fees are eel annually by each Eisb'itt and have not increased i o 59
since fiscal year 1992-93.
ERVICES JOINT WORKS OPERATING FUND [table 3] In addition to Me sewer,service fee.singlefamity property owners also pay an
175,000 175,000 average of 2.8 pecent of the basic 1 percent property tax far sarary sewer
11254,000 1,250,000 Approved Budget service provided by The Ois,i The Combined All of Me property tax levy
5B4O00 58.000 Allocation to Individual Districts wuh Me sewer service fee equals appraximately$108 a year.which is also
325,000 462,900 among Me lowest for similar agencies in Southern California.All property tux
195 nc
µG txE
199 Pmptl 191 193395 revenues are currently allocated to debt payments a the Certificate.of
4,886.000 6,351,400 a.. n,u. .a Inwesa guessed pl- euae•.a Participation(00i Fund a clearly indicate that Me debt service is repaid
6,960.000 7,269,5CO No. 4ct.e1 Rue(MG] rhevesca)1M61 Flmv IMG) of I= L4Mtution from pmparty axes,whereas operations and maintenance co sTa are paid by
1,4660,000 1,512,600 , 6.685m 158.281 eazfi.al 9,95% W41tm o user%es. MuldfemiN dwellings and mobile home owners pay a change per
22 oo0 235,]00 c 314,800 2 26a9949 has.41 .8,09065 32.40% ,2619.011 dwelling unit M less M Chat is somewhat en single family homeowners.
20,00
•d 4•J90N 4,209,900 3 21,127,06 1716,681 26.91040 3046% 18.564.0]] [gmmQn'cial, industrial and OM¢P major usQR[government.6Ch001a,and
2,820,000 3,095.000 5 3,343.02 (146031 3,191 3.6v% 2.007.000 nonprofit organizations)are changed per 1,000 square feet of building.while
601000 134,000 6 4.121.14 18.81 4,13o.e 47" 2.599,000 significant industrial users are also charged by volume and by the relative
14010W 513.500 7 7,150(1 has 7,418,00 8.56% 4.655.000 stren
gth(of such things as heavy meals and organics)of Main wastewater.
10,000 15,000 11 5.857 CQ 131 T821 5.55540 641% 3.498,000
3,314,000 3,375,500 13 ae30, 32.29 92035 1,06% 576.00(1 WHERE THE MONEY GOES
975,000 983.203 14 2.599,27 1270.221 2.31 Be 2s9% 1,463,000 Table 1 shows Me Joint Works Operating Fund Comparative budget summary
26,417,00c 29,983p0O
f549 0001 1470,000) TpTAIb ee.430.z1 w4 11pA1.6o1.4 a..saa.e,uP led btu% •54.380.0. expendibures for fiscal years 199495 and 1895-96.This able details Me
25.868.000 29.513,000 requirements far salaries,wages and benerla,and for all materials,supplies
and services. Current projections for 1995-96 are Mat flows will be down by
[3,875,000) [3,800,000) approumately 1,742 million gallons(a 1 percent decrease this fiscal year
WHERE THE MONEY COMES FROM while expenditures will increase by an estimated$6,729,000.The major
increases are in operating supplies,contractual services,repairs and
$47,651,000 $54,380,000 Figure 6 shows the relative contributionsWe fiscal of War 19 revenue sources sufficient maintenance, research and monitoring,salaries and banal and training.
a meet Me aal funding needs Of Me fiscal year 1995-9fi operations,espial
88,430 86,688 facilities,construction and debt service budgets.The sources of revenue are The 1995-96 Joint WerEs Operating Fund comparisons by department are Syr/� y_ .✓ram//._ ��•2(�ha�
538 628 investment interest and miscellaneous receipts,residential and industrial user provided in Table 2 for Me some done period,and Me Joint Works Budget
fees, property tar revenues and reserves. Allocation m Individual 0iethdis is presented in Table 35 6 7 Courty Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California
I
916�kS OUNTY $ANRATION 6STRICTS
D' July 24, 1995 of ORANGE COUNTY, CAUFORNIA
109a ELUS AVENGE
Pa BOX 8127
FOUWAM VALLEY.CALBOMIA SIM41P
UWBB2z 11
STAFF REPORT
RESERVES AND THE OCIP
As a part of developing, refining and implementing the long-term financial plan, the
Directors considered and revised the Districts' policies regarding cash reserves. While
the current policies are included in the 1995-96 Budget, the purpose of this report is to
more fully explain the various types and levels of the six-element reserve structure.
Operating Reserves
There are two types of reserves which are considered Operating reserves and are
funded from sewer service fees.
Cashflow Reserves have also been called "Dry Period Reserves." These
reserves are established at a level sufficient to provide funding for the first six
months' operating requirements prior to the receipt of sewer service fees which
are collected as a separate line on the property tax bill. (To reduce costs and to
ensure collection.) Because the first allocation of payments is received from the
County Tax Collector in November/December, it is necessary to have funds on
hand to meet operating expenses in the first six months of the year. (Some
agencies meet this need with an annual Tax and Revenue Anticipation Note
[TRAN] issue.) This Cashflow Reserve has been established at year-end at 50%
of the annual operating requirements.
Contingency Reserves have been established in the operating funds at a level
approximately equal to 20% of the operating expense requirements. These
reserves have been used to cover unanticipated and unbudgeted maintenance,
repair or operational needs or emergencies.
Capital Projects Reserves
The "2020 VISION" Master Plan projected capital outlays for the expansion and
improvement of sewage collection, treatment and disposal facilities of$2.8 billion
inflated dollars through the year 2020, or approximately $93 million each year.
The financial plan portion of"2020 VISION" and the ensuing Five-Year Financial Plan
recommend that one-half of these improvements be paid for from borrowing, and the
remaining half on a pay-as-you-go basis. In order to allow the Districts to enter the
w
Reserves and the OCIP Q
Page 2
July 24, 1995
financing market under favorable conditions rather than to be captive to cash needs, a
Capital Projects Reserve equal to one years estimated construction needs has been
established. With these funds available when needed, the Districts can plan our
borrowing to take advantage of low interest rates and can continue to construct needed
facilities free from financial market dictates or abnormalities.
Environmental Requirements
The purpose of the Environmental Requirements Reserve is to accumulate sufficient
funding so that the Districts could immediately begin any necessary planning,
engineering, design or construction in the event the discharge permit requirements
changed or other significant environmental requirements or restrictions were suddenly
imposed.
Because the sewer service fee is collected on the property lax bill, it could take eighteen
to twenty-four months to adopt a fee and to begin to receive any proceeds, depending
upon where the need and decision fell within the property tax billing cycle. Districts'
Engineering staff estimates that we could reasonably expect to spend $5 to $10 million
in the first eighteen months after a decision to build full secondary treatment facilities.
This reserve is also available to fund any unexpected or unplanned Air Quality
Management District or other new environmental protection requirements.
Insurance Reserves
The historical cost of sewerage facilities accumulated over the past 40 years is over $1
billion. All of these facilities can be subject to damage from fire, wind, flood and
earthquake. Engineering staff has estimated that replacement cost of the treatment
plant facilities could be three times the historical cost because of the higher construction
standards reflecting known earthquake risks, technological advances, and
environmental and cross-media protection requirements. An independent insurance
and risk management consultant and staff have determined that protection from
financial loss resulting from a natural disaster will require additional reserves.
Each year, the Directors review the purchase of property insurance. For 1995-96, an
all-risk policy was purchased for $1.3 million. This policy provides earthquake coverage
of$30 million after a 5% deductible. Experts have advised that a magnitude 7.1
earthquake could result in a structural loss of approximately $200 million based on
historical cost.
Federal and State disaster assistance may be available after a natural disaster.
Generally, this relief is on a short-term, cost reimbursement basis, up to some limit.
This funding, if available, is expected to cover only a 30-day time frame and to require
substantial local matching funding.
v Reserves and the OCIP
Page 3
July 24, 1995
Fee Stabilization Reserve
The Fee Stabilization Reserve will accumulate any fund balances in excess of the
requirements for the other approved reserves. If funded, these reserves would be
drawn down in subsequent years to reduce sewer service fee increases.
Debt Service Reserves
Some of the indentures governing the various Certificate of Participation (COP) issues
contain requirements for Debt Service Reserves. The purpose of these reserves is to
provide some sense of comfort to investors that payments will be made in the event of
some temporary cash shortage and to provide time for alternative funding. As these
requirements are set by contract, and the funds are not available for any other use,
Debt Service Reserves are not a part of the Districts' Reserve Policy.
December Balances
As of June 30, 1995, the amounts held in the various reserves were:
Operating Cashfiow Reserve $ 31 Million
Operating Contingency Reserve 13 Million
Capital Projects Reserve 100 Million
Environmental Requirements Reserve 10 Million
Insurance Reserves 178 Million
Fee Stabilization Reserve 0
Debt Service Reserves 21 Million
Total $353 Million
Variable Rate Borrowing
As mentioned above, the °2020 VISION' Master Plan and the Five-Year Financial Plan
specify a 50:50 mix of capital funding from borrowing and pay-as-you-go. So far, the
Districts have borrowed approximately $433 million of the $750 million projected in the
Master Plan. The balances outstanding as of June 30, 1995 were:
Reserves and the OCIP
Page 4
July 24, 1995
Series "A" Variable Rate $ 94,300,000
Series "B" Fixed Rate 24,505,000
Series "C" Variable Rate 95,600,000
1992 Refund, Variable Swap to Fixed 150,105,000
1993 Refund, Variable Swap to Fixed 45.700.000
Total $410,210,000
The Series "A" and Series "C" issues are both variable rate COPS. This means the
interest paid by the Districts changes as rates change in the economy. Almost half of
the Districts' debt is variable rate debt. (The two refundings which are matched with
long-term SWAPS are considered fixed rate debt.) This 50% variable rate mix is well
above the 10%-25% mix usually allowed by the rating agencies. A major reason for this
variance is the total reserve level at the Districts. Since the reserves are invested in
short-term instruments whose interest rates will move in the same direction as the debt,
the Districts are considered fully "hedged" against the interest rate risk associated with
variable rate debt. This is prudent financial management, policy and practice.
Property Taxes
Prior to 1978, the Districts levied a separate property tax for operations and
maintenance, capital improvements and debt service. Ad valorem property taxes were
an approved part of our Revenue Program required by the Clean Water Act.
In the period between Proposition 13 and 1990, property taxes were used in the
Operating Funds to pay for operations and maintenance and for COP service in Districts
1, 2 and 3.
With the adoption of the "2020 VISION" Master Plan and the Five-Year Financial Plan,
the Districts embarked on a long-term borrowing program utilizing Certificates of
Participation. Consequently, Resolution 92-47 and others were adopted dedicating ad
valorem property taxes first to debt service. Because nearly all of the Districts' property
taxes are used for debt service, the State's confiscation of property taxes since 1992-93
has been limited to approximately $3.5 million each year.
District 13 received no property taxes as a result of formation negotiations with the
County. District 14 is fully financed by the Irvine Ranch Water District.
Sewer Service Fees
The Clean Water Act requires all agencies that received Clean Water Grant Funds to
have an approved Revenue Program. The Districts' Revenue Program was approved in
1979. One requirement of an approved program is that users pay their fair share.
Reserves and the OCIP
Page 5
July24, 1995
Between 1981 and 1990, each of the then Districts adopted sewer service fees to meet
operating requirements. These fees are authorized in the California Government and
Health and Safety Codes, and must be adopted through the Ordinance process. Fees
were last changed for the 1992-93 fiscal year subsequent to the State's properly tax
confiscation.
The annual sewer service fee for 1995-96 for a single-family dwelling in each District is:
District Annual Fee
1 $ 83.24
2 71.52
3 73.89
5 96.75
6 76.47
7 50.09
11 60.00
13 100.00
14 Funded by IRWD
Fees can be set only at a level that is sufficient to cover the "cost of service." Clearly
these costs would include operating and maintaining the plants and the collection
system, and the costs to repay debt. Whether the cost of service includes the costs to
build reserves in accordance with the policy and need of the Districts is untested at this
time.
Orange County Bankruptcy
The failure of the Orange County Investment Pool has left the Districts with $92,639,489
of"Settlement Secured Claims" and "Repayment Claims," in place of the cash that had
been on deposit. Various alternatives have been discussed or considered relative to
the likelihood or method of the Districts receiving this "final 20¢."
Forgiveness
Some State Legislators and even some local cities are proposing that the
Repayment Claims be forgiven, that the County should not have to repay
these amounts, as it has no cash. The Districts' total Repayment Claims are
$48,456,792.
Reserves and the OCIP
Page 6
July 24, 1995
Landfills
The County has proposed to sell their landfills to raise the funds. The County
Sanitation District Act allows the Districts to own or operate landfills. Our
proposal is for us to buy the landfills with our Settlement and Recovery Claims
and perhaps some cash. A fair price and resolution of future environmental
liability issues would need to be established. Another area of concern is
differing service areas for sewage service and for landfill service, and local
representation on the Board of Directors.
Local Sewers
It may be possible to provide financial relief to other local agencies and cities
if the Districts assumed responsibility for maintenance of local sewers. If this
service is a cost center for cities and if the Districts can reduce the cost, such
a charge could result in an overall fee decrease for the user community.
Flood Control
Storm water run-off through the flood control system or"non-point source"
discharges finds its way to the same ocean that we protect and monitor. If
responsibility for flood control, local sewers, landfills and regional sewage
treatment and disposal was assigned to one agency, then that agency would
truely be responsible for watershed management. If it is sensible, efficient,
and cost-effective to combine these functions, the Sanitation Districts would
be the logical choice as lead agency as we have the most complex operating
system and experience.
Property Tax Division/Confiscation
The State has confiscated local property taxes in the past. Some have
proposed that local agency taxes be used to fund County needs. The Districts
could lose over$31 million per year in this scenario.
Past property lax diversions have excluded those taxes used for debt service.
As all of the Districts' debt service is for capital improvements and almost all
of the property taxes are applied to debt service in accordance with District
Resolutions, continuation of this exclusion would be beneficial and very
important to the Districts. Loss of the property taxes would require an
increase in service fees to make COP payments and to comply with revenue
coverage requirements of the borrowing contracts.
Reserves and the OCIP
Page 7
July 24, 1995
Accumulated Reserve Loss
Some elected officials have been reported as seeking to obtain, raid or steal
the accumulated reserves of special districts and to give them to the County.
As explained earlier in this report, all of the Districts' reserves have been
appropriated for special purposes and are used as a 'hedge" for interest rate
risk of the borrowing program. It would not be prudent or wise financial
management to have variable rate borrowing which was not matched by
investments or reserves. Any further reduction of reserves must be
accompanied by a corresponding reduction in variable rate debt. This means
that the reserves should first be used to retire debt.
The Orange County bankruptcy and the failure of the Orange County Investment Pool
can provide a new way to conduct business. Many options must be considered
including reorganizations, dissolutions, consolidations and joint powers authorities or
agreements. The Sanitation Districts are committed to a proactive approach and to
being a part of the solution.
GGS:lc
,:� .�
W
JOINT CHAIRMAN'S REPORT
JULY 26, 1995
1) The first of two scheduled tours on the Enchanter was
held on July 13, and those directors that went found it
very interesting and worthwhile. (Director Sheldon
Singer may have a comment.)
The second trip is scheduled for July 28. The boat
can only handle 3 to 4 guests at a time and we can
schedule additional tours in August if any of the
directors are interested. If you would like to go on a
future boat trip, please call Jean Tappan in the
General Manager's office.
2) Tour of Plant No. 2
As of today, four directors have signed up for dinner
and tour of Plant 2 on August 2, in place of the
Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services
I
Committee. Please contact Ed Hodges tonight if you
plan to attend in order to get a count for the dinner.
2) Upcoming Meetings
A. The Operations. Maintenance and Technical
Services Committee is not scheduled to meet in
August. The next meeting will be September 6th
at 5:30 p.m.
B. The Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization
Study for Administrative Employees is scheduled
to meet Wednesday. August 2nd after the tour of
Plant 2.
C. The Planning. Design and Construction
Committee is not scheduled to meet on in
August. The next meeting will be Thursday.
September 7th. 1995 at 5:30 p.m.
2
D. The Finance Administration and Human
Resources Committee is not scheduled to meet
in August. The next meeting will be on
Wednesday September 13th. at 5:30 p.m.
3) AMSA GOLD AWARD
I am proud to announce that the Districts once again
are the recipient of an AMSA Gold Award. This
award recognizes the Districts' complete and
consistent National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System Permit Compliance. In 1995, 132 AMSA
member facilities qualified for Gold Awards and 87
qualified for Silver Awards. These numbers reflect
the level of excellence in environmental protection
that all AMSA members strive for.
3
n
4) REINVENTING THE SANITATION DISTRICTS--DAY
ONE
Ted Gaebler (Gaybler), the co-author of Reinventing
Government, will be at the Districts all day
Wednesday, August 23rd, meeting with the executive
management team, supervisory staff, the Steering
Committee and addressing the Directors at the Joint
Boards meeting.
5) Directors who attended one of the orientations and
plant tours in June were given a booklet prepared by
staff called "An Introduction to Wastewater Treatment
at CSDOC" (what Don calls "The Primer"). All
directors who did not attend and do not yet have a
copy can pick one up after the meeting.
4
� M
MEETING DATE July 29, 1995 TUql 7:30 p.m. DISTRICTS: 1,2,3,5,6,7,11,13 a 14
DISTRICT? S- g u-I JOINT BOARDS
IMORENOI..........• MC OUIDAN ........ (BOWMAN) ........... AGE .............
IPER ........... FERRYMAN ........ MASTWOBI........... BROWN ........... —
ICOONT21 ........... WRRIY .......... ISCOTT) ............. COLLWS ......... —
IPOTTS) ............ SALTAREW ........ WEBAYI ............. COK ............. —
ISTEwEN ........... **M ......... IMM ............... OEBAY ........... —
WEW ............... DENES ........... —
DISTRIGT3 3= S W-- ' mAUDO ............ DETTW F ......... —
IPARKER) ............ DUNLAP .. ........ —
ISCOTTI ............ iSYSN. .......... IDOWNE/7............ ECKENRODE ....... —
IGUU MONI ......... WELCH ........... IPEMYI ............. FERRYMAN ........ —
IBEW.............. DENIES ............ IANDEASONI .......... FLORA ........... —
IPARXERI ........... DUNLAP........... INARSHAW .......... CMI ........... —_
IDOWNEY I .......... EC ROM ........ (WELCH) ............. OUWKSWi ........
�
IANDERBONI ......... FLORA ............ WARD) ............. HAMMOND ........
(MONEROI........... MCOUIOAN ........ IBAUEM ............. LEIMIG .. .........
ICOONTLI ........... WRMW .......... (MWER) ............. URN . ............
MORBYI ............ SA . ............. IMORENOI ............ MC GUWAN........ _
¢IAKETI............ Swam ........... (COONTZI ............ MURPHY . .........
ISTEMEM ........... SitliGM ......... WUNLAM ............ PARKER.. . ........
IDALY) ............. ZEMEL ............ IEPPERSONI........... RICE ..... ........
_ n (NORBY) SA ..............
DISMICT3 S- O U� � IMTTSI . ... .. ...... SALTAREW........ _
_
IDOTSONI .......... . SAPIEN ......... ww [DOTSONI ............ SAPIEA ...........
PARKEM ......... .. ¢ W .. SwamIBOWMANI .......... AGE .. ST ............ ...........
STANTON .........
(HASTINGS).......... ORO" ......... ISTANTONI ........... SUMER ..........
ISCOTA .. ......... 00w%RS ........ (MILLEN ............. SWAN............
IANDERSOIS ......... FLORA ............ MAHLSTROMI ........ SYLVM ...........
IMARSHAW .. ....... ORIFTW ........... (OULLMSMQ .......... WELCH ........... — ——
—
IDAUER) ............ LEIMM ........... WALY) .............. 2EMEL ........... _
MINEW ............ URN ............. JAL
IEPPERSONI.......... RU:E ..............
OTH�EI
... STAFF
WORM ............ SA ANDERSON . WOODRUFF
RLAKETI............ swam ........... HASENSTAB DEMUR......
ISTEMEM ........... MRRIDR ......... "MGM ... mow .....�
IWAHMTROW ....... MWA ........... JONK ..... LEE........
IDALY) ............. ZEMEL ............ KYLE ..... LNDSTROM..
/� UNDER .... NIKON......
DISTRICTS rl Z 3 [. MCwT .. $HAW......
(COXI ... .......... DESAY............ fi_ MOIELLY .. STONE ...
(STANTOM .......... STEWER........... OOTEN .... .......... �
IDMAY) ............ COX ............. STREED ... ..........
TA IN S .... ...SC fJ I TORRM ... — •••• ••—
KHSTMCTS
17 ............ FERRYMAN........:
R vw ... ..........
lCoxi SOR
ISTANTOM ........A.E. SUMER.......... .... .. • .
DMTRIT S- l w� :L —
(WAND) ............ HAMNIOND......... _
IP07731 ............ SALTAAEW........
(COX) .............. DEBAY............
IPERRYI ............ FERRYMAN.........
IM0REN01 ........... MWUMAN ........
ICOONR) ........... WRMW .......... —
ISTANTONI .......... SUMER...........
:SAUEDISTRICT„ ..= a M :: =
RI ............ LEIPl ......
ISAUERI .......... DLTTLOR .......
ISTEINEM ...........fiAMITSM .......
DISTRICT,3 S= 3 IJ
IWELCHI ............ GUILIXlMI ...... _
IDALYI .. .......... ZEMEL ............ _
ICOONT2I ........... MURPHY ..........
(DUNIAR ......... PARKER ...........
(STANTON) .......... $TETHER...........
DISTRICT 14 $ = y W t I
IPOTTSI ............ SALTAREW
(COONTZI ........... NRMHV
........ 'L[L�
IWARDI ............ HAMMOND......... _
ISTANTON) .......... SUMER.......... DU02
IMILLERI ............ SWAN ............ 0712E195
f
MEETING DATE: July 26, 1995 TM, 7:30 p.m. DISTRICTS) 1,2,3,5,6,7,11,13 a 14"
DISTRICT 1 JOINT ROARM A
IMORENO)........... SIII WNIW ........ 4/ WWWNI ........... AGE ............. .
IMRRYI ............ FERRYMAN ........ IHASTINUSI........... BROWN ...........
ICOONRI ........... NMMM .......... ISWTTI ............. M!!aE!'.......... _
IPoTTeI ............ SALTARRU ........ T (N:BrTY) ............. LOX ............. .JL
ISTEWEp ........... SOMMI 1 ......... 7 (CO)0 ............... GES,Y ........... .
(BEW ............... GENES ........... _
UMUEM ............. DETTToiw ......... _
DISTRICT 2 (PARKEA) ............ WNLAP ........ _
ISLOTR .............MlbIR ........•• y/ mOWMEYI............ ELKENRODE ....r.. JG _
IGULLLYSW) ......... WELCH ......... j/ IPERRYI ............. FERRYMAN ........ �v _
IBEW .............. GENES ............ f IANOERSONI .......... FLORA ......... _
IDOWNEY) .......... EOMCMNRODE •••..... fml. ............. OUWXIIN ........
_
IANDERSOW ......... MORA ............ - WAND) ............. NAMMOND ........ —
IMORENOI....•.••r.. NCOUMAN ....... (SAUERI ............. MIMIG ........... _� —
ILOONRI ........... MURRIY .......... o (MWERI ............. MNN ............. J I
WORM ............ SA ............ IMOREN01............ ML GUXMN........ •/gam _
RLAKER.•..••..•... "am ......... (COO I ............ MURPW ......•••• .lL
(MINERS ........... AliU1FW ......... WUN"PI ............ PARKER........... fS_
WALYI ............. ZEMEL ............ (EMRSONI........... RICE ............. _V
(NORSV) ............. SA .............. mot/ —
DISTRICT I (MMI ............. SALTAREW........ _� —
WOTSWI ............ BAPIEN ........... —
(PARKERI ......... wNi.A ........... JL — . —
IPAgIVI ........... AGE ............. QLAKET)............. SINGER ........... ,JG _
ISOWMAN) ....••.... AGE ............. BL [STANTON) ........... ST INER .......... —
000771ON.......•.. B110WN ........... t/. ISTANT . ........... SWAN. ..........
I/C0T11 ............./WMM. .......... JL IMILLESTROSQ......... SWAN............
SYLVIA
(MARSHONI ..•...•.. FLORA ............ _1// (WAHLBBONIA ........ WLDH ...........
(MARSHAW ......... DRSFN ........... .✓ (DaYl .............. WELCN ........... =
(BAUER) ............ IINN . ........... WALYI .............. 7EMEL ......... _
IMINER)MEN ............ LWN .............
IEPPEgSONI.......... RICE ...........•• � STAFF OTHER6
INORIY) ............ SA .............. I ANDERSON . j. WOODRIIW
LAK ..�
RER............ SWDER ........... . HASENSTAB DEMIR. . .... —
ISTEINER) ... ..... �IBA1(i111 ....... HODOES ... KNOPF . . ...
IWAHWTRONO ....... SYLVIA ......... UONK .... LEE ........
IDALY) ......
.•..•.: ZEWL ............ KYIE ..... LWDSTRDM
LWDER .... NIXON......_
DISTRICT6 MCINTYRE a, SSHAW......
ICOXI .............. "MY............ MC EEO&Y TONE ..... �
ISTANTONI .......... BTEWFR........ N
... JG BTgEED ••••••••
IDEBAYI ............ COX ............. ..........�
T .. ........
DISTRICTS TORUS .. ..........�
IPERRN ............ FERRYMAN......... J� VINUNT . . . ..........�
WWSOR . . . ..........�
ISTANTOS .......... DESAY............ 1 a#
ISTANTONI .......... STEWER........... 0 .�.w �../.�.,yE �.�,�
DISTRICT /Y- - 4Az4d
M'ARS1 ............ NAMMOND......... JL Vj yj;
MARDI SALTAREW ........ J(fTM':
ICOXI .............. OEBRY ......... A,A� -
RRYI ............ FFARYWN.........
IMORE(M
NO)...........NT7 MC ........
(COO1 ........... J
STENERRIW .
..
ISTANTONI .......... /IEWEq........... y
DISTRICT 11
ISAUERI ............ LEIPEID ...........
ISAUERI ............ DETLOFF ......... ��/
DISTRICT 11
IWELLHI . OULLOISO)I ........ ✓
IDALY) ............. ZEMEL ............ JG
ICODNTZ) ........... MURPHY ....... ... JG —
IDUNIAPI ........... PARKER ........ . .. g/
ISTANTONI .......... STEINER........ . . . .
DISTRICT 14
IPoTT61 ............ SALTAREW ........ yL —
ILOONTZ) ........... WRIW ...........
WARD) ............ HAMMOND......... . —
ISTANTONI ........ STEWER.......
..••
IMILLEPo ............ MAN ........ DLp2
— OT/PGISS
PUBLIC SIGN-IN SHEET
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
JuIy 26 , 1995 BOARD MEETING
NAME ORGANIZATION FIRM
Please Print Please Print
�7uf o 11
07/26/95 -JOINT BOARD MEETING
#2 - Roll Call
PK: We have a quorum present in each district, Mr. Chair, however we do need to
appoint a chair pro tem for District 2.
JC: District 2, OK, I can do that, right. Barry? You're it. All right, thanks.
#3 - Relating to a000intment of Directors
JC: I do have a supplemental agenda for District 3, recognizing active Director George
Brown and alternate Director Marilyn Hastings, we'll need a motion for approve. All
right, consider that unanimous. I do not have any requests for public comments, so
seeing none, we'll move on to item No. 4. Before I start into a report here, I'd like to
recognize Sheldon Singer who would like to make a few comments before the Board.
SINGER: (inaudible)
#6 - reports
JC: Thank you, Sheldon. That leads me into my comment is the second trip on the
Enchanter is scheduled for July 28, so those of you who haven's signed up may do so.
The boat—to clarify Sheldon's comment apparently can only handle 3 or 4 guests at a
time so if we get more than that, we'll schedule additional trips/tours in August if you
have an interest in doing so. If you're interested call Jean Tappan in the General
Manager's office and sign up with her. Tour of Plant No. 2—As you may recall, there is a
tour scheduled for next Wednesday, starting from here at 5:30 with a light dinner and
then bus to the plant No. 2 for a tour. Only four directors have signed up at this point in
time so that if any of you do wish to go on that tour please contact Ed Hodges and let
him know, tonight preferably. Three more have signed up, so we're at seven, great. I
encourage you to do that as I have in the past because these tours are very informative
as Sheldon just learned.
Upcoming meetings:
Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee- not scheduled to meet in
August; will meet Wednesday, September 6, 1995, 5:30 p.m.
Ad Hoc Committee on Space Utilization for Administrative Employees -Wednesday,
August 2, after the Plant Tour
Planning, Design and Construction Committee-will not meet in August; will meet
Thursday, September 7, 5:30 p.m
Finance, Administrative and Human Resources Committee -will not meet in August; will
meet Wednesday, September 13, 5:30 p.m.
1
We received another award which I'm proud to announce that the District once again is
the recipient of the AMSA gold award. This award recognizes the Districts complete
and consistent national pollutant discharge elimination system permit compliance. In
1995, 132 AMSA member facilities qualified for gold awards and 87 qualified for silver
awards. These numbers reflect the level of excellence and environmental protection
that all AMSA members strive for. Re-inventing the Sanitation Districts, Day 1. Ted
Grabler, the co-author of Reinventing Government, will be at the Districts all day,
Wednesday, August 23, meeting with the executive management teams, supervisory
staff, and the steering committee and addressing the Directors at the joint board
meeting that night on his insights into re-inventing government. The Directors who
attended one of the orientation plant tours in June were given a booklet prepared by
staff called An Introduction to Wastewater, sometimes it's referred to as the primer. All
the directors who did not attend and did not get a copy you're welcome to get one. It
looks like this and Penny has them up here at the desk so afterwards I'd encourage you
to pick this up if you don't have one because it gives you a very simple, 15 page
oversight as to what this organization is all about. With that Don you're next.
DFM: Mr. Chair, some items that were in your packet. One is an executive budget
summary that looks like this, it's a foldout, it was not designed primarily for your use
because you have the whole budget. It was really designed for the entire staff. I've had
four sessions with four departments on the budget, talking to all employees about the
budget, about my concern, about bench marking, and about their roll in helping to
achieve the objectives of bench marking, and to talk about training, our overall
commitment to making a good organization better. I've got three more sessions
scheduled in the next few weeks. Secondly, there is this report on the reserves and the
OCIP which was requested at the executive committee meeting. We didn't have a
chance to get it in the agenda, but it is in your booklet and is something you may want
to review in connection with the item No. 13 on the agenda tonight. Finally, we got a fax
today from the Register, and this is the form of a heads-up, it says we are surveying
board members of all non-school agencies that have repayment claims coming under
option A of the settlement agreement, and the question is: Do you favor forgiveness of
your agencies repayment claim against the County, Yes or No? So if you haven't gotten
one of these at City Hall, or at your home or business, you probably will. I would like to
recognize George Scott, he came stumbling in the door with crutches under his arms—
good to see you George. One other comment, just so I don't forget and lose somebody,
I did want to announce that tonight we will be adjourning the meeting in honor of Burnie
Dunlap's wife. She died of cancer this week. Burnie's been through a really tough time
and its been a shame, and we wanted to do that in her honor. Tom?
TLW: Just briefly. There's been a lot of things going on that you're going to hear about
later in the meeting, bankruptcy update, etc. The only item I'd bring up now just briefly
for those who have been here for more than a few months, a couple, three years ago
we were engaged in a huge environmental lawsuit, the United States vs. Montrose
Chemical and all the cities and participants. That case was resolved a little over a year
ago. We effected a settlement that involved all of the districts and all of the cities as
well as above 150 entities in Los Angeles County, another 30 or so in San Bernardino
2
and Ventura County. The decision by the District Court Judge Houck was taken on
appeal by the corporate defendants and the Court of Appeal 9th Circuit reversed his
decision, which approved our settlement agreement, saying that he hadn't really done
his homework and read the record and therefore he ought to go back and read it. We
have been responding to that in meetings, very intensive meetings, with the Justice
Dept. lawyers over the last month or so and we are striking and have come to pretty
close agreement on a new consent agreement. The most important point for each is
that they are not asking for another dime. We're basically re-working the agreement—
there is going to be a reallocation between the federal agencies as to who gets the
proceeds so it's still looming out there, but it's not envisioned that it will have any cost
effect on your cities or this district more particularly. This should be resolved but there
may be periodic news reports on it and I wanted to make sure that you were aware of it.
ECKENRODE: (inaudible)
TLW: No it's not on the agenda but I'd be glad to do so. Well I'm no sure that anybody
knows that. For those curious about that, there is a House of Representative bill that
was actually authored by freshman congressman Brian Billbray, who is from San Diego
and what it provided for was basically a flat-out exemption for San Diego. Their singular
treatment plant is at Point Loma, they have an operation very similar to ours with
advanced primary treatment. Their outfall is very similar to ours, it's not as long—it's four
miles instead of five, it's a little deeper, it's 300 instead of 200. They have been pushing
for this together with another bill that was passed last year which allowed them to file for
a 301(h)waiver much like we have. That bill was signed into law and a waiver
application has been filed. They got a tentative and they expect the formal tentative
ruling, which probably will be approval, in about 2 weeks. The legislation was put on the
Speaker's corrections day agendas, item No. 1 two days ago. The purpose was to
particularly highlight the ridiculous federal laws that continue to exist and you probably
saw in the paper it passed by well over 100 votes, I forgot the count but it was like 268
to 137 or in that neighborhood. It will probably face some tough slugging in the Senate
as its impact on us: it probably would have some favorable impact but there is a line of
thought, Blake is really up to speed on this, there is a thought that it could also have
kind of a reverse effect, but probably it will stand alone.
BPA: There certainly is some concern about there being some backlash that would be a
result of that bill which is in the House now only. One of the interesting effects of this is
this thing is known down in the San Diego area now for a couple of months that
Gingrich was going to put this number 1 on his list. At the same time that the City was
applying for a waiver similar to ours, and up to a few months ago, EPA was strenuously
opposed to a waiver down in San Diego and much of the environmental community as
well. However, faced with the alternative of just an outright walk by San Diego on it,
they've changed their tune. The regulatory and environmental communities are far
more favorably inclined to look at a waiver application. I think that has direct impact on
us. Our application on August 28th will be six years since we applied for an extension
to our existing permit so we've been operating under the provisions of a 301(h) waiver
since 1985. That's the good news. We've got 11 years out of one, five-year permit due
wholly in part to EPA's intention to moving forward on our application, but with--in effect
3
it's an extension of the concept of less than full secondary treatment. We continue to do
the monitoring program, Sheldon mentioned some of the activities that he saw out on
the Enchanter. We think it's important that we continue, through our monitoring
program, in the measurements of our effluent from our treatment plan, that we can
demonstrate that we're not impacting the environment. That seems to us to be a good
middle ground is to gel the special permission for a waiver but to along the way prove
that we continue to protect the environment. That's the strategy that we've used
consistently since the mid-80's, it's the strategy that landed us the first large waiver in
the country, and its the strategy that keeps us in favor with EPA, State of California, and
the environmental community. We basically do not have people on us regarding our
waiver and that includes people like the Surfrider foundation that has a particular
interest in the quality of ocean waters off Orange County.
TLW: Just as an example, as Blake said, our application is six years old. San Diego
filed theirs on April 27 and they got preliminary approval which doesn't have any legal
significance, on June 12, 45 days later, our was six years, and they are scheduled to
get their tentative approval, which does have legal significance, on August 14. What
can I say?
DFM: One distinction I think is that the Congressional approach was a permanent
waiver; the EPA staff approval is a five year waiver like ours, if they get it, and we
presume that they will.
JC: Any other questions, let move on to item No. 7
#7 - Election of Joint Chair
JC: As you know, I was nominated at the last meeting, we carried these over to the
second meeting, leaving nominations open. Are there any further nominations? Thank
you, I appreciate that. Item B—Oh, move nominations be closed, I think—I go along with
that--do you want to make a motion and be unanimous, somebody? There is nobody
else, what are you going to do? Again, thank you for your recognition and support.
#B- Nomination for Vice Joint Chair
: Nominate Dan Welch.
JC: Any other nominations? Nomination for Sal Sapien. Nominate Peer Swan. Any
other nominations? Motion to closed nominations?
TLW: The Board secretary does have ballots. I would point out to you, that under the
provisions of the Brown Act, secret ballots are not permissible. What we have done in
the past, which in my opinion is valid, is we can use, we don't have an electronic tote
board voting, each district has the opportunity to caucus, each district gels to cast a
single vote, so there will be 9 votes cast, that will require 5 votes for election. The votes
from each member in the district can be by written ballot but they will have to be signed
and then they are available for review.
4
SAPIEN: (inaudible; declined nomination, expressed concern re Peer Swan)
JC: But you are withdrawing your nomination. So we have two nominations, Peer Swan
and Dan Welch. With that, Penny will you pass out the ballots.
TLW: By district, that's correct. The Board Secretary is going to give the envelope to
each district chair. There are an equal number of ballots in there as to the number of
districts, so each individual will have a ballot, but it will be—you must sign your ballot,
and if you have an illegible signature, please print it.
JC: I'd like to give both candidates to make a comment, and especially Peer in rebuttal
to the speech that was made about him. Peer?
SWAN: If I could get your attention?
(voting commences)
JC: If I can have your attention, the suspense and surprise is over. Peer Swan was
elected 9-0.
SWAN: I will make a very short and brief—I want to thank all the people that stuck with
me, I know that we've done a lot of things that have caused some people problems.
Sal, I've arranged that at the end of this year I'm stepping down from the IRWD
Chairmanship so next year, at this time, I'll will not be the Chair there. I would like to
think that most of you remember the fact that we pioneered variable rate debt here, we
saved by doing that, saved this district probably 10 to 60 or 70 million dollars in debt
financing. In fact, some of it has paid for itself and is no net cost to the District and a lot
of good things. I am very dedicated to change, I'm an impatient person, I'm probably
the most—I realize I'm a controversial person because of it but I really and truly
appreciate the support I had tonight, it was a difficult decision, and I bear no ill will to my
good friend in Yorba Linda who I consider a good friend.
#8 - Minutes
JC: If there are no corrections or amendments I'll deem them approved. Seeing none,
move then to item 9.
#9 - Ratification of Claims
JC: For a roll call vote ratifying payment of claims. Penny?
PK: Motion carries Mr. Chair
#10a-f(Consent Calendars
JC: Any director have one they would like pulled?
5
DEBAY: (inaudible)
JC: Ok, 10E. Any others, do we have a motion for approval except 10E? Motion,
second, any opposition, consider that unanimous. 10E, Jan?
DEBAY: (inaudible)
LINDER: ..we expected to start.. and we added a little bit of time-looking at it a second
time and during this period...supposed to work...good possibility we'll shut down partially
for the holidays which necessarily is going to have that much in the previous time frame.
We want to allow if we have to shut down for any reason during that period. We don't
expect to take that long, we certainly hope that it won't take that long..if we can get the
contractor to do some boring under Superior we may not have to shut down. Normally
that was going to be an open cut. If we can do that, we can cut the time and get done
earlier.
DEBAY: (inaudible)
JDL: That's something that we will talk with Don Webb and traffic engineering and Mark
Sanicorian and we'll address that. Maybe if it takes a separate detour or we can
segregate that sidewalk onto PCH. We'll take a look at that.
JC: Want to move the item? Any opposition? Consider that unanimous.
#12a - Minutes of the Executive Committee
JC: Motion on Item 12A which deals with the minutes of the Executive Committee 1-6?
Yes, excuse me John. Okay.
GULLIXSON: (inaudible)
JC: So we have a motion for 1-6 with the amendments on 6 as requested. Any
discussion or question, consider that unanimous.
#12b
JC: What I'll do here is--item 12B1,2, which has to do with the operations committee, 3,
4, which is Planning Committee, 5, 6, 7, which is the Finance Committee. Is there any
item in this group that you'd like to have a discussion on. Yes Mark.
MURPHY: Question on one (inaudible)
JC: Bob, do you want to answer that?
DFM: Was there any other competition is what I think you're asking, isn't it Mark?
OOTEN: (inaudible)
6
JC: ..On 1? Ok. Any other questions about these Items, 12b1-7? Yes, John.
GULLIXSON: (Inaudible)
JC: We have a motion 12b1-7, recognizing that Mark Murphy is abstaining on#3 and
Steiner is abstaining on B1. Any opposition? Consider that unanimous.
#12b8 - re Consolidation of the Districts
JC: This has to do with a consideration relative to the Districts activities on consolidation
of districts and I think as most of you know the executive committee has been reviewing
this subject for 8 or 9 months now, and what we have is a presentation to give you all an
overview as to what this is. John do you want to speak before or after? Go ahead.
GULLIXSON: (inaudible)
SWAN: I think at the Executive Board meeting what we asked from District 14's point of
view is that we operate somewhat differently. I think staff has a presentation that shows
that IRWD joined District 14 and agreed that the district, instead of having each
homeowner in the district pay a fee to the district, the district writes a check to the
Sanitation District-operates its own treatment plant and treats substantially 80% of its
wastewater in its own treatment plant. Having a uniform bill that charges CSDOC over
to the district in addition to paying for our operating, the wastewater treatment plant at
Michelson which really does 80% of the treatment didn't appear fair. The district also
has diminimus debt outstanding on District 14 essentially IRWD has written a check for
all the capital projects whereas the remaining districts have debt financed the projects
for the last five years. Therefore, the proposal that we saw was doing a pro rate share
of the debt onto everyone and the user fee and that way people in the district would be
assessed twice instead of once and what we wanted to get before we agreed to the
consolidation—and I'm an advocate of consolidation—is to have an agreement reached
between the districts and district 14 to look at the inequities of this arrangement and
have that addressed and then go ahead with consolidation and the suggestion that I
would have would be that we—if it is a direction of the rest of the districts--and I think
district 14 is the only one that has a significant issue like this, if that is their pleasure to
go ahead with the consolidation, address the district 14 issues, and then consolidate
district 14 and we can catch up in the LAFCO process. That would be an alternative
suggestion.
JC: Just to be clean because all of you should be comfortable with this and John's Point
is that if we're not all comfortable, we should move more slowly. The only thing, for your
information on the agenda tonight is to approve in concept this consolidation process.
One of the reasons is that staff has to go through a filing with the LAFCO and it
probably is going to take 30-60 days to get that filing even put together from a staff
standpoint and after that I don't know how long it takes to process it through LAFCO,
but it could be a while. So our view was that if we generally believe that this is the thing
to do, then that's a piece of the puzzle that needs to be in process. It doesn't mean
we've made a final commitment. If it sounds, John, like we're promoting it, and where
7
we pull the plug and create a problem for ourselves, then I think all the directors should
be cognizant of that. I had always viewed this as just part of the process and we may
pull the plug for a variety of reasons, but this has been something that most of the
directors I believe have been very supportive of. So that's the context of the approach
tonight. We wanted to have Blake give you a background of this thing so we make sure
you understand it as best as possible. Bill, you had a question?
STEINER: (inaudible)
SALTARELLI: (inaudible)
JC: I don't want to create an argument about this thing because we all need to be
comfortable with it, I keep repeating. Staff believes that it needs to do some work. We
brought this to you time and time again to make sure this is something that you want to
move forward with and staffs position on this is that they will not take the application to
LAFCO until we see it one more time or we see it, actually, I shouldn't say one more
time. But should they even embark on preparing one. John?
GULLIXSON: (inaudible)
DFM: The staff is not trying to rush this thing at all. We're trying to be responsive to
some concerns we've heard expressed by Board members. Actually we started
negotiations to update a 10 year old contract with IRWD, District 14, a couple of months
ago. And I suspect staff is going to get together on the terms of that agreement more
quickly than you all may when it gets before you, frankly, because I think there are
some money issues there that you may want to think about. So think within a month we
will have, at the staff level, the negotiation will be complete, and I think the staffs will be
satisfied. Whether you all are satisfied remains to be seen, but I think it would be
helpful to hear Blake's presentation so you get a flavor of the issues that are before the
staff and will be before you eventually, he's prepared to do that and I think it will be time
well spent.
GULLIXSON:
DFM: To the barest minimum, we would not be recommending lowering anything, we
would be recommending that they all come up to the highest district eventually.
JC: Let's hear the presentation, is that all right Sheldon, and then lets ask questions
and we'll have a better flavor of what's going on. Blake, you're on.
BPA: ..the issue that we're talking about is governance by one body, not nine as we
have right now. The existing situation is for the 9 boards there is a total of 59 seats and
right now 39 members as a result of the downsizing that we undertook late last year.
Assuming that we have one district and one seat per agency, we would have 25 seats
in 25 members of the board. So that's what it would look like assuming one sanitation
district. Within the staff report there are discussions of administrative, financial, and
legal savings that's about $144,0001 guess you can decide for yourself if that's a
significant number or not but that's our best estimate of what the consolidation would
save us in annual costs of doing business. As has already been pointed out, revenues
8
and expenditures would be thrown basically into one operations pot and one capital pot
with the clear implication that some districts will gain by that, and some districts will lose
by that and I've got a graph to illustrate that, district by district. We have flat connection
fees across all agencies so that would remain the same, it's $2350 per domestic
connection. Property taxes and user fees: we would propose that for right now it would
remain as is and there is some equity issues relating to that, but with the uncertainty
about what's happening with property taxes with the action that this board is already
taking with respect user fees, which is to remain at status quo and the fact that our
window of opportunity for adjusting user fees and getting them on the property tax bill as
the method of collection is basically closing in on us because we basically at this point
are at a point of no return. We'll have to wait until next budget year around March or
April to really make the decision to increase user fees and then get those on to the
property tax bills of next year. Finally there are some significant issues related to the
IRWD District 14 issues and I can also get into that and that may represent at least on
one side of the spectrum the kind of equity issues that are echoed to maybe a much
smaller degree with the rest of the districts. One of the questions that was raised is:
should we remain as a sanitation district or should we look at some of the other
opportunities within state law; Tom did an analysis of that which is in your agenda
packages and Tom if you could take a moment on this.
TLW: I'll be very brief. The report that was included in the package, we did a synopsis
trying to give you 4 or 5 lines about each of the alternative forms of governance out
there. Any one of these could be created or converted to run a wastewater district, but I
would note that each one of those, except the sanitation district, comes with some other
downsides, and in my opinion the downsides outweigh the upsides. Some of those are
sanitary districts under the 23 Act, or the County and California Water Districts. They
have some very broad, liberal provisions, you don't have to go to bid on public works
contracts, but that's a very basic process. Our contracts are so huge that I don't think
you'd find staff, you wouldn't find my office recommending in favor of that in any event. I
don't think the boards would support it, so it's kind of a moot issue. Joint Powers
Agreement doesn't provide necessarily for all of the authorities you would need to effect
all the transaction that we do. County Service Areas could be done but they just
wouldn't allow us to do it. The bottom line is: Sanitation Districts, when they first created
this Act 50-odd years ago, was quite visionary was probably well before the term
regionalization or regional government or large combined government was even a buzz
word. I strongly suggest that we not change the form of government. I don't know of
any real negative downsides in the Act that unduly restrict these operations. We've got
virtually 50 years of experience with it, it's really not gotten in our way and it's just a
good vehicle. If anybody has any questions or suggestions, we have representatives in
the room tonight from the California Water District and from Sanitary Districts out here,
so we have our members...sanitary districts, but I think the only way to go—the only
other alternative would be to create at the bottom by special action of the legislature
that's basically creating your own charter and you write your own rules for operation but
that's a time-consuming, legislative process. I would suggest to you its a minimum of
one legislative session and that's going to open up a lot of tough issues to resolve that
aren't going to gain you anything unique that's not available in the Sanitation District.
9
BPA: One clear advantage of the Sanitation District is they can operate landfills, so that
of course is an issue that has been under hot discussion more lately than ever before.
...District 14 and some of its unique situation before I get into the graphs that show the
individual districts...First the board is represented by IRWD, County, Irvine, Orange and
Tustin, and formed in 1985, District 14 purchased and owns 15 million gallons worth of
capacity in the treatment plant, flat out 10 year ownership of it. In fact that's ongoing
unless there is a change in that formula. IRWD is unique in that they are billed directly
for the operating, maintenance and capital costs related to the facilities, and they in turn
end up billing their customers. IRWD is the only agency within the family that owns and
operates their own sewage treatment plants that's a major source of reclaimed water in
their area and by virtue of that, there some major swings in their summer and wintertime
flows. The wintertime that's when we see the lions share of flow from IRWD; during the
summer, when they are reclaiming, their flows drop off significantly. IRWD also,
because of the sewage treatment plant, to centralize solids processing and taking
advantage of the economy of scale here, they discharge their sludges into the sewer
line and they come down here. We capture them in our treatment process and then
process them further and they go off for beneficial reuse. There are some direct costs
related to that and we capture that in one particular charge that we bill them for. One
other complication is, not all IRWD is served by District 14. There are some flows that
exclusively go to their treatment plant and do not come here. On issues of
consolidation, there is really two basic options here. One is to complete the ongoing
negotiations with IRWD before proceeding with consolidation or to run some kind of a
parallel process. The current situation is that we bill them directly for the actual costs of
operating and they pay that and pass it onto their users. The consolidation alternative
for their operating costs is to continue that practice of billing them, or to implement an
entire new direct relationship with all the users in that area and that would imply having
to get user charges adopted and passed onto the property tax bill. Staff isn't suggesting
that, it's just one of the ...this is most dramatic with District 14 but there are variations of
that with the other districts and I'll show you on the tables in a minute. All the districts
pay their equity share of the capital facilities based on the actual flows that come to our
facilities. We looked at a 3 year average and we divvied up the costs of the capital
facilities on that basis. That is not the case with District 14. They have purchased 15
million gallons from the capacity and their equity share is based on 15 million gallons.
The rest of the districts swing with actual conditions, district 14 has been stuck at 15
million gallons for 10 years. They use far less...the comment is that they actually
discharge far less than that. The expectations 10 years ago was with all the building
going on, and without the expectation of conservation that occurred, we reasonably
believed that within the 10 year life of the contract we'd see flows approaching 15 million
gallons a day and that was one of the operating assumptions under which the contract
was initially entered into. It didn't turn out to be that way. So while the rest of you were
paying your equity share based on actual, IRWD was paying based on 15 MGD.
Arguably, that was part of their cost of buying into the club, and was certainly part of the
original intent of the agreement 10 years ago, but there is an opener in 1995 to revisit
that issue. So we have that in mind, that conditions today, 10 years later, might drive us
toward re-negotiating what is a fair share. The other thing that's unique is that district
14 hold onto their capital reserves and pays us on an on-going basis, their belief being
that they can get better returns than we can on reserves and for that reason it's only pay
10
as you go. As was mentioned before, we do have preliminary steps, ongoing
discussions on that...capital facilities that really two, three different questions I guess.
First one is: do we commingle the existing reserves and the equity account of district 14
with all the other districts, throw it into one pot, or do we continue the negotiations
regarding the return of some portion of that equity account to IRWD. The implication
being, that the other eight districts will make that up to IRWD. The other issue is do we
continue to have a direct billing relationship with IRWD or do we move toward the
practice of moving to their customers, and we have a direct relationship with them.
Tom?
Tom : (inaudible)
BPA: It's certainly a possibility where the Sanitation Districts operate Michelson. It's not
beyond the...We tried to normalize this by equity in terms of persons served, rather than
because the districts are all different sizes, if you look at just the gross number, I really
don't think you get a clear picture of what the actual equity is from district to district. If
you can see your own district, districts 5, 7, 11, 13 and 14 are above the line, which is
an average of$401 per person served vs. 1, 2, 3 and 6 which are below the line. So a
straight across the board, throw it all in the pot, that's how the issue of equity goes out.
Let's look at reserves, cash reserves. Because District 14 holds onto their own
reserves, they have very little money, there are some operating reserves and one-
quarter's worth of capital reserves that are transferred over to us, the rest of it they hold
onto and you can see where the other districts are. An average of$216 per person with
considerable variation in District to District. Long term debt: Again, and District 13 really
falls into this one as well, is the other Districts are the ones who have been doing the
borrowing up until now and you can see there is a significant variation in that, another
issue that needs to be addressed. On the issue of...property taxes: taxes, user fees,
and then the total of the two in the green, Mike I'm not sure, is that district 14 line
correct?
Mike: Except there is no property tax revenue there. That's correct, there is no property
tax revenues so it's equal to user fees equal the total. The user fees are equal to the
total, because there are no property tax revenues..
BPA: The green line is really the total between property taxes and user fees. You can
see the variation in that. We would recommend at this point that we just hold everything
as status quo, waiting to see what happens with future raids on our property tax as well
as what will be ultimately user fees as various issues will come out I guess over the next
year in our capital reserves and what we may be doing in terms of landfills and other
facilities. You can see there is considerable variation and depending upon where you
sit, and depending on what category you look at, you district may do better or worse
under consolidation. Over time, as property taxes are lost, we would expect to make
that up with user fees, but we wouldn't at this point suggest that we bring the user fees
down for those districts that are ahead of the game now. That would issue have to
be ...
_? (inaudible)
11
DFM: That answer to that would be yes, the difference now is $100 a year for 5, and
$50 a year for some of the others. The answer is yes, we would bring everybody up to
the highest. We're not talking about lowering anybody's. At least that would be the staff
recommendation.
BPA: In terms of the rates that we charge, for large regional plants we're one of the very
lowest in the country, some of the highest, Boston, is $600 a year right now per
household, so it's probably about $250 on average for individuals.
GULLIXSON: (inaudible)
BPA: You're looking at the comparison of taxes plus user fees graph?
UNKNOWN: That chart that's up there now is not in the handout. That's a correct
statement, and this chart up here is just showing existing property tax structure and user
fee structure. It's not talking about what it would like if it was consolidated. The one in
the handout attempts to show you what it would look like if it was a consolidation.
BPA: This is per person. We were looking at trying to normalize by parcel, but the
trouble with that is some of the districts have a higher number of multiple family dwelling
units per parcel and it starting screwing things up so we thought we would just get down
to basically the average person within your district, what is their stake in the question.
The recommendation is in your packages tonight, to receive and file the staff report and
consider for resolution approving the recommendation to consolidate the 9 separate
districts into one, with a single board of directors made up of one representative from
each of the agencies that, one from each city, sanitary, water district, one from
unincorporated portion of the county, and to direct staff to initiate all steps necessary for
the LAFCO process.
UNKNOWN: I have a question, you had a motion. Let's answer some questions first.
Blake, before, would you explain the differences in general terms of why the costs from
one district to another exists, I know I'm not defending district 5 but it jumps out all the
time and has a lot to do with the coastal situation, and I think district 11 has a similar
problem of capital costs, pumping costs and operating costs and some of the inequities
that we talk about that exist, just because a district exists doesn't mean that an inequity
doesn't exist within a district like district 3 which goes from the coast to the mountain.
BPA: Right. This is the average operating cost per person. As you can see, district 5 is
a significant outlier and the reason why is a series of pump stations that are necessary
to move wastewater from Newport Beach up to our plant 2 and for that reason there are
additional operating, electrical, maintenance costs associated with that, as well as long-
term capital impacts. You might argue, well, district 5 has additional operating costs like
that, shouldn't they be in a revenue zone exclusive to their own. It turns out there are
areas in district 5, the gravity to our facilities have virtually no pumping. On the other
hand, some of the larger districts, district 3 is a good example of that, you have people
in district 3 who are across the street who are charged the same amount as people who
live In La Habra. The cost to construct the sewer to get it here and of course the
12
associated operating costs, are significantly different, so there is a wide range of
differences throughout the agencies depending on where you reside about what the
actual cost to deliver sewer service by this agency really is. Of course that goes for
both regional services from police to fire to whatever you can see in your own cities
where there is significant variation in the cost, demand of a particular user and yet the
revenue you get from your users is fairly flat across the agencies.
JC: Sal had his hand up, John, I'll get to you for a motion. But let me get some other
questions or input because this is important that you try to understand as best we can
on this. Sal? Well, let me deal with questions first. Jan?
DEBAY: (inaudible)
JC: This doesn't go to LAFCO, what we're looking at here, these are decisions we
make. Go ahead.
TLW: Well, the Executive Committee wrestled with this and the staff report going
through the committees was to follow the direction of the Board and to initiate the
studies and the proposals, including initiating the LAFCO. Because there was several
concerns expressed, the basic outgrowth--the decision of the Executive Committee, on
a 6-3 vote, was to proceed ahead. The resolution before you tonight does not authorize
filing a LAFCO application. That is not the intent of the Manager or anyone else at the
staff level, to initiate until it gets to the Committee and has reviewed the studies. And
that's why the resolution is really pretty broad and generic and it was essentially
designed to find out if there was any absolute opposition to the idea of consolidation.
That's why the first paragraph just says we support in concept, and the second says
direct staff and my office to undertake the studies that would be necessary to file an
application with LAFCO. So that's what the Chair pointed out a little bit ago. I may take
us—we're shooting for 30 days to get some of these studies, but some of those studies
are a little complex, the finance dept. has done a lot already, but there's a lot more to
do. It may 30, it may be 60 days before those studies could be presented back to the
board committees to get an up or down vote. If we are ready, or we don't choose to go
to LAFCO...
JC: Dan?
(inaudible)
JC: The Board will make the final decision and has been every step of the way and
would continue with that. Sheldon do you have a question?
SINGER: (inaudible)
JC: Any other questions?
GRIFFIN: (inaudible)
13
JC: Ok, well I think John's got a motion, right?
GULLIXSON: Before I make a motion, (inaudible)
JC: Ok. Everybody heard the motion. Any opposition to that motion? Yes, Sal.
SAPIEN: (inaudible)
JC: It's the same thing. OK, we have a motion, second, any opposition. We're going to
continue to work on this, Dan?
WELCH: (inaudible)
BPA: We weren't suggesting that.
JC: One of the items that have been suggested is that we could set up zones within one
district that have retained that same user fee in that area that exists today. But that is
something that we will evaluate as we go along. OK, any other discussion, Yes?
LEIPZIG: (inaudible)
JC: I wasn't trying to imply that. From a finance standpoint we could merge all the
financing into one, that's doable, regardless of where the revenue comes from. You
revenue, which is the real issue, if user fees can be defined any way you want to define
it. You can leave it exactly the way it is, as revenue-generating zones, rather than
districts, you could reevaluate those in the future if you head some that are very costly
zones that might look different than what they look like today, or you could flatten the
thing, but that's up to the Board.
DFM: Mr. Chair, I think one thing that Blake touched on, Vic, is that if we're talking about
inflation only, it may be a very long time before you raise—if you're talking about losing
your property tax which has been discussed as you know, it could be sooner, and that
was the point. Tom?
SALTARELLI: I think the direction we're going...is that when we do make the
decision..possible that the equity is possible to eliminate...(inaudible)
SCOTT: (inaudible)
JC: OK. We have a motion and a second on the floor and I haven't seen any
opposition, alright. So motion passes unanimously. And that does cover all of a, b and
c. OK Let' s move to B9. Don, would you like to address this one?
DFM: Mr. Chair, I think the most important thing that you hired me to do is get the right
people in the right places. And we've gone through a fairly exhaustive process of
recruiting for another assistant general manager, but as explained to the two other
committees this went before, we have a provision that says if you higher above the mid-
range, it requires approval of this board. So I am here tonight to ask for your approval
to do that, given the fact that Judy Wilson is taking a reduction in salary to take the
position and that the second highest person on the list would have to do the same thing,
and the third is no longer available that we need your support of this action to move
14
forward and get this person in place and begin to make the changes the E &Y has
recommended and that you have supported, so I am asking for your support of that.
JC: Discussion, John?
GULLIXSON: (inaudible)
JC: Well I don't think you can do that. That's an opposite motion. You can make a
substitute motion, but can you make it the same one, only the opposite? I didn't think
you could do that, I'm sorry, Tom. Ok Well I will speak to the motion. I understand
where John is coming from. I think it is the wrong to be doing this. If we felt that way
about, we shouldn't have put the position in place in the first place, and the second
place we shouldn't have authorized staff to go out and search for an employee in this
range and the employee that came in fits the range, and certainly fits the experience
level that goes in to the range and so it seems to me very unfair to staff and unfair to the
employee we have identified here to now change our mind and say we're not going to
do this anymore. It's just not a good way to do business. Anybody else, Sal?
SAPIEN: (inaudible)
SCOTT: (inaudible)
SALTARELLI: (inaudible)
JC: Anybody else? The substitute motion on the floor is to deny, was there a second,
sorry Dan. Anybody opposed to the motion on the floor, not opposed--the substitute
motion, which I don't think is a legal motion, but we won't go into that. Substitute motion
is to deny the recommendation and turn down the person for the job and eliminate the
position. That's the motion on the floor. Yes, Don.
SAPIEN: (inaudible)
TLW: Clarification. I forgot that there was a motion, I was following that the Manager
had made the report and I was thinking Director Gullixson had addressed the report and
was making the first motion. I was thinking that he had made it contrary to, as a
substitute to what the manager was recommending or what the Executive Committee—I
forgot that there had already been a motion placed on the floor to approve the report.
My apologies, the substitute motion would not be in order because it is directly opposite
to the motion pending on the floor. 1 just thought—we do operate, to a limited extent, on
Robert's Rules, but the motion can be addressed—
SCOTT:
JC: Well we have asked for a question on the legality of it--
TLW: The substitute motion would be out of order if those in favor of the content of the
substitute motion, their decision or choice would be to vote in opposition to the primary
motion, if that fails, the floor is clear and any other motion can be made, even a motion
that is, in substance, directly opposite to the first motion made. George?
15
SCOTT: (inaudible)
JC: Don, that's what I was trying to accomplish and avoid this argument. Let's just
process it, is that all right? So there is a substitute motion on the floor to deny the staff
recommendation and deny this position.
TLW: There is obviously concern on the floor and the chair has the gavel and had
indicated he's going to take that motion made by Director Gullixson.
JC: All in favor of denying the position, raise your hand. 3, 4, OK. Now the primary
motion is on the floor, approving staff recommendations of this person in the position,
anybody opposed? Raise your hands. The same 4. Motion carries. Don thanks you.
DFM: Mr. Chair, the next item is the consideration of motion to receive and file the
Ernest & Young financial report which was presented to the Executive Committee and
it's recommended that it be received and fled by the joint boards.
JC: Any questions? Do I have a motion, second? Any discussion, any opposition? All
right that's unanimous. Item No. 13 is the update on the commingled investment pool.
Blake, do you want to give us a briefing on this.
BPA: One area that I think that probably is of primary concern of this agency is the
OCIP committee and also your staff is looking at the issue of the districts owning and
operating the landfills. To that extend, Price Waterhouse has been asked to exercise
due diligence at what the value of the landfills are. We just brought on a consultant on a
purchase order who has been operating in the landfill and hauling arena for well over a
decade. Clements Environmental Engineering will take a look at the issue and we will
be in an informed position to understand the financial operating and engineering issues
relating to the landfills, with the expectation that things are beginning to really cook on
that issue. Don?
GRIFFIN: (inaudible)
JC: Yes, that's right, Don. In fact, DFM has been discussing some of those issues with
various people, as to whether there needs to be a JPA that includes all of the county,
cities, representatives if you're into the landfill business, orjust what the structure might
look like. So you're absolutely right, we need to look at all the issues, not just the
financing. The financing isn't just bond financing, it has to do with revenue streams over
a given period of time. What I was also going to point was that there has been a lot of
discussion lately that I just want to remind you and give you a heads up about some of it
you've been reading in papers or seen in proposals where there is discussion of us
losing property taxes to the tune of some $31 million a year. There is also discussion
about stealing the reserves or whether we want to waive our repayment claims which
we have about $90 million in repayment claims. Many of us have taken the position that
we don't believe in our monies being stolen, either once, twice, or 3-4 times and that's
what some of this represents and so we need to continue to hang tough and figure out a
way to solve this problem without having our money stolen from us. So I don't know
16
whether any of you have thoughts about that. I know John Gullixson has spoken very
eloquently to the Executive Committee the other night about the lawsuit side of it, which
doesn't go without saying that is an important component of this process. Waiving
money that is ours and caving into property tax deal does not appeal to me at all and I
would hope that the rest of you think the same way.
SWAN: I think it quite urgent that the Districts look at their position and not only as a
district but as cities because you're seeing played out in front of you item by item, I get
you, I get you, etc. With all due respect to Bill Steiner, who I think the world of, I don't
share that view on everyone on that floor and certainly not their attorney, who is, in my
belief, is after everyone penny they get from us and to protect everything status quo in
the county. I think there is a real serious thing. I think it's moving very very fast, there is
no alternative solution to this, it is in the cities' and districts' interests to expeditiously
consider things like this that there be an alternative to this Plan B that is widely
ballyhooed that first takes a little from the OCTA, then takes from the city, then from the
districts, has already sent around a letter to all the cities and districts about come up, tell
us how much money you really have and how much we can take from you. If that
doesn't chill your heart, nothing will. So I think it's absolutely important that
organizations take a leadership role with an alternative and that has to come reasonably
quickly. Staff has to go and look at the options at the dump. We're obviously not in the
airport business but there has to be a resolution to the O.C. Bankruptcy quickly, it's in
everybody's best interest.
STEINER: (inaudible)
JC: I wouldn't be so quick to write off the cities, Bill. They came after city money before,
they can do it again. Don, you had your hand up.
GRIFFIN: (inaudible)
HAMMOND: (inaudible)
GULLIXSON: (inaudible)
FERRYMAN: (inaudible)
SWAN: Jim, I heard what you say. But I go back to what Barry said and the
conversation with the legislator. Getting up there and making the rationalization or
defense of the reserves is not it, the deal is to solve the bankruptcy and do it quickly.
So I think what the Cou ty is doing in their Plan B is developing a plan to solve the
bankruptcy essentially y robbing Peter to pay off their debts. All the people in this
room except Bill are Pet r and the thing is if you want to avoid this, you have to come
up with another plan. I think it's incumbent upon people to work quickly to do that.
JC: There is no harm in doing what Jim just suggested and I think we should do that to
go on record and we can, if that's agreeable to everybody. Let me also say, and Don
has brought this up before, and we've had conversations about it. I and staff have
personally been involved in a lot of discussions with a lot of parties both in and out of
the county trying to educate them, trying to find some form of resolution and we hope to
be able to do that very soon because for all the reasons that have been expressed here
I don't need to repeat them—We're in trouble, as a county. And if we don't find a
solution fast, we're going to be in deeper trouble. Sal?
17
SAPIEN: (inaudible)
SWAN: The problem is, that doesn't solve the bankruptcy, and that doesn't solve the
$31 million and 1% property tax that comes to us and so that's hanging out there and all
of a sudden rates go up by $31 million a year.
SAPIEN:
DFM: There is about $90-92, 90+ outstanding..
TLW: That's in the form of the senior secured and repayment claims.
SWAN: It's 20 percent plus a holdback that the First Boston holdback, plus the interest.
Because you're in the bond pool, you're have that special deal.
JC: Jim.
(inaudible)
JC: And if we haven't conveyed that message, we should reinforce it, that's exactly what
we have been doing. What Jim is talking about the landfill option as a solution for us
and we have been working on that, how that might play. And as Don has pointed out,
it's got a lot of issues associated with it, but it's one of many yet to be examined. Yes
Don. Unless we put a plan on the table right here that we're going to vote on and
broadcast to the world and the lawyers as to what that is going to be, we're going to
continue the way we've been doing it, and we've been negotiating with a number of
people, the landfill people, the county, the legislators, other cities and other people to try
to find a proper solution to this. But I don't feel it's fair, Don, to put one out there and I
don't think it's fair to say that we aren't doing anything, because staff and I have been
doing a lot. When something is available to us that we can vote on, we'll put that
forward, but I don't think when—this is like being in a legal battle where you don't want to
tell your adversaries who is stealing your money what your game plan is. The only thing
I can convey to you is that there is some very serious discussions going on about
several different game plans, so it's not the issue of nothing is being done. George?
George: (inaudible)
Tom: (inaudible)
JC: You're Tom. I've heard in several different discussion as one component of it, and I
think that the big message you're conveying is that we do this as a County family. We
do have to figure out all the options that are available to us and how can we work
together to solve them ourselves and not have the cram-down from the legislature.
That item and several others have been put forth to deal with as a package. Jan and
then Bill.
DEBAY: (inaudible)
JC: It's not just as simple as our reserves, it is the income off the property taxes. It's
even a more significant issue at $31 million a year, that goes away fast. There is, I'm
18
told, legislation that is ready to come forward on this that could have a lot of impact on a
lot of us and we're working to kill it.
JC: I might add to that, because I had made reference being involved in some
discussions and the OCIP committee, which BPA sits on, has invited DFM and I and
others to come in and comment on issues as to how we might develop a strategy. One
of them is similar to what Bill was talking about and I mentioned it to the Executive
Committee the other night, and that's the creation of a friendly bank as it is called on
some terms. The idea is you might create a JPA that is finance-oriented, it could look to
assets of the County as a revenue stream, it could look to our own property taxes as a
stream if we needed to, it could look to the repayment debt as an asset if you can call it
that, its a build-on, if you look to existing reserves that could become financible to allow
us to begin to finance this whole financial arena ourselves and not have somebody else
do it for us and through our own JPA that could happen. It's just one of many different
ideas that have been put forth. Its a financial mechanism that's been put forth. As Bill
said, he's been talking about it for some time but it's an example of the kinds of things
we need to have on the table and be talking about if were going to get our way out of
the financial end of this problem. Now, if John Gullixson is successful and gets $2
billion out of the investment bankers, we're all home free, and so I think all of these
efforts are valuable to pursue, but we do have to come up with a pretty good plan very
very fast and that's what staff and several of the rest of us are trying to accomplish. I
think—is there any more discussion on this? We really are trying to do something and
put a plan forth and I think we will real soon. Sal? Well you could as one or two
agencies you could do that, that might happen, but it's a matter of seeing whether we
can get other agencies that will cooperate with us and so far that hasn't materialized as
a proposal, but its on the table as consideration. I agree with you. We can do that. But
I think the risk is Sal, what Bill was talking to, one agency doing it is risky. If we can do
this as partners we're a lot better off as a county family. You know how it is Sal. I heard
about the Techite program for a year, and he did a great job with it, so hopefully staff
and others will come out with a great job on this one too, were trying. Jim?
SWAN: Mr. Chair, what I hear is a general settlement is that I think we're going to take
the bull by the horns and do something and I think we're trying to formulate a plan with
other people to do that, and that's not definitive so there's not a plan to talk about here,
but as soon as that plan becomes definitive I'm sure that we'll all be involved. I think
this organization because of its compensation (sic) has been doing that.
JC: Any other comments?We will have this item back on the next agenda, I can
guarantee it. We do not have a need for a closed session for tonight. So unless there
is any other business, yes, Vic?
LEIPZIG: (inaudible)
JC: With that we're adjourned.
19
COUNTY SANITATION
b
DISTRICTS NOS. 1 , 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 , 13 AND 14
OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
MINUTES
JOINT BOARD MEETING
J U LY 265 1995
Q�gZRICTS pp
yQ r� 00
G
� a
ww
F�r�pG THE EN��QOd
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018
ROLL CALL
A regular meeting of the Goods of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,2,3,B,B,
7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County,Canlomia,Was held On July 26, 1895,at 7:30 p.m.,in one
Districts'Administrative Offices. Following the Redo.of Allegiance and muco don the roll Wss"find
and the Secretary,reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1. 2.3.B,B, 7, 11, 13 and 14 as
follmem:
AMWE ALTERNATE
DIRECTORS DIRECTORS
E DISTRICT NO.I: y Pet a.M.
Fer4 Clair Ted R.Pa"
y James M.Murphy
Femme,Chair pre tam _ JoanAnh Pony
y Man as Muryhy Joanne Coond
I'ly Rome
me a ha Serelli Jim Po
Hope tts
r S Stanton y Wlggm G.Reiner
DISTRICT NO.2: _ John Collins,Clair L George Goon
y Derriel T.Welch.Chair pro lom Alm M.Owes n
y Barry Dares _ Bob Bell
y Buve.Durdep Glenn Planar
x Norman 2.FSYen ode Carol Downey
y James H.Flora Suave Anderson
y Pat McGuigan Ted R.Mother
y Man A.Murphy _ As.Coorm,
y At.Se Cloh Relay
y Sheldon Singer George L.21ekm
_ Roger Sharon y William G.Steiner
y Bob Zemel _ Tom Daly
DISTRICT NO.3: y Sal A.SeDian,Clair Harry M.Doman
y Burnie DUNep.Clair pro tam Glenn Parer
Cecilia Age Walter Bowmen
y George Brew. _ Merlyn S.HMdt fur
_ John Colima y George Scan
y James H.Flora _ Staue Anderson
y Don P.Griffin _ Patsy Manlall
y Victor Lelpem _ Ralph Bauer
JL_ Wally Limn Eva G.Miner
y Fat McGuigan Ted R.Morem
y Margie L Rim _ Grace Epperson
y Julle So Chris Norby
Sheldon Sm,r George L.21ahm
Roper Stamen y William G.Steiner
x Chades Syleh Roben WaMerrom
y Bob Zemel _ Tom Daly
DISTRICT NO.G: g Jan Debay,Clair John C.Cox,Jr.
y William G.Slower,Chair pro tam _ Roper Stamen
y John C.Cox,Jr. _ Jan Den,
DISTRICT NO.B: y JamM M.Ferrymen,Chair Arthur Pony
y An Delzi Clair pro tee _ Jam C.Cox.Jr.
y Willlm G.Steiner _ Roper Stamen
DISTRICT NO.7: y Bony Hammond,Chair Mike Ward
y Thomas R.Sallorelli,Chair pro ter Jr.PoRs
y Jan DMey John C.Cox,Jr.
y James M.Ferryman Ardor Perry
y Pet McGuigan Ted A.Mo..
y Merit A.Murphy Joeme Coenn
y WiDlam G.Steiner _ Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO. 11: y Vim Leipzig,Chao Ralph Bever
y Shirley Cedbn,Chair pro tam _ Ralph Bauer
Roger Same. y Wilson G.Steiner
DIS TICT NO.13: y John M.Gothumn,Clair Denel T.Welch
8 y Bob Zonal,Chair We tam Tom Del,
y want A.Murphy _ Joanne Coome
Glenn Parker Burnie DunMp
y W Ilhm G.Steiner Roger Stamen
DISTRICT NO.14: y Thomas A.Seltmelli,Clair if.Pon.
y Man A.Murphy,Clair pro tom Joeme Comer
y Berry HammorM _ Mike WaM
William G.Steiner Roger Sternon
y Poar A.Swan _ Darryl Miller
-2-
07/26/95
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Don McIntyre, General Manager, Blake Anderson,
Assistant General Manager, Penny Kyle, Board
Secretary, John Finias, Gary Hasenstab, Irwin
Haydock, Ed Hodges, Steve Hovey, Patricia Jonk, 3
Steve Kozak, John D. Linder, Pat McNelly, Bob G
Oolen, George Robertson, Misha Rozengurt, Ed
Tortes, Mike White,Paula Zeller
OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Bill Knopf,
Phil Stone, Alternate Director George Zlaket
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive and file minute excemt from the
City of Seal Beach re Board Appointment That the minute excerpt from the City of Seal
Beach re election of mayor, appointment of
alternate Director, and seating a new member of the Board, be, and is hereby, received and
ordered filed, as follows: ('Mayor)
District Active Director Alternate Director
3 George Brown Marilyn Bruce Hastings'
ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chair recognized Director Singerwho
Recognition of Director Singer re Districts' stated that the Garden Grove Sanitary District had
loan to Garden Grove Sanitary District just repaid the$5 million loan the Districts granted �.../
to the Sanitary District a few months ago. He then
thanked the Directors on behalf of the Sanitary District for coming to their aid when it was
needed.
ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chair advised those Directors who were
Report of the Joint Chair not able to attend the first cruise aboard The
Enchanter, the Districts' monitoring vessel, that a
second trip was scheduled for July 28th. Anyone wishing to attend was asked to contact the
General Manager's secretary to reserve a spot as the vessel can only accommodate a small
number of guests at any one time.
Joint Chair Cox also mentioned that a lour of Plant No. 2 was scheduled for August 2nd. He
requested any Directors interested in attending this tour to contact Ed Hodges.
The Joint Chair then advised that he was pleased to report that the Association of Metropolitan
Sewerage Agencies (AMSA) had presented the Districts with the 1994 "Gold" award for their
consistent compliance with all terms and conditions of their wastewater discharge requirements. J
-3-
07/26/95
✓ It was then announced that those Directors who attended one of the orientation plant tours in
June were given a booklet prepared by staff titled, "An Introduction to Wastewater", which is a 15-
page overview of the Districts' operation. Those Directors who did not receive a copy were asked
to see the Board Secretary after the meeting.
The Joint Chair then regretfully announced the passing of Director @umie Dunlap's wife,
Jacquelin D. Dunlap. He requested that the Districts adjourn this meeting in her honor and
memory.
The Joint Chair then announced the following tentatively scheduled upcoming meetings as
follows:
Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization Study for Administrative Employees-Wednesday,
August 2, after the Plant Tour
Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee-Wednesday, September 6,
at 5:30 P.M.
Planning, Design and Construction Committee -Thursday, September 7, at 5:30 p.m.
Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee-Wednesday, September 13,
at 5:30 p.m.
ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager referred the Directors to an
�..d Report of General Manager Executive Budget Summary included in their
meeting folders which was designed for Districts'
staff. He reported that he has held sessions with four departments talking to all employees about
the budget, his concerns, benchmarking and about their role in helping to achieve the objectives
of benchmarking, training and our overall commitment to making a good organization better.
Three more sessions are scheduled to be held in the next few weeks.
Mr. McIntyre also stated that a report was included In the Directors' meeting folders on reserves
and the OCIP, which was requested at the Executive Committee meeting.
ALL DISTRICTS General Counsel gave a brief report on the lawsuit
Report of General Counsel entitled U.S. Government v. Montrose Chemical
Corp., at al. The Districts were involved in this
environmental lawsuit and the case was resolved a little over a year ago. A settlement
agreement had been effected that involved the Districts and all of the cities, as well as about 150
entities in Los Angeles County and another 30+ entities in San Bernardino and Ventura County.
The decision by the District Court, Judge Hauk, was taken on appeal by the corporate
defendants. The Court of Appeals 9th Circuit reversed his decision which approved the
settlement agreement, stating the Judge hadn't independently reviewed the record. Mr. Woodruff
has been participating in meetings with the Justice Department lawyers and counsel for the other
settling local government entities over the last month or so and have come close to a new
consent agreement. The most important point for the local entities is that EPA is not asking for
./ -4-
07/26/95
additional financial contribution. There will be a reallocation between the federal agencies that
gel the proceeds, but it's not envisioned that it will have any cost effect on the cities or the
Districts.
In response to a question regarding an NPDES permit waiver being granted to San Diego and ,
how that would affect the Districts, Mr. Woodruff stated that a House of Representatives' bill that
was authored by Congressman Brian Bilbray of San Diego provided-for an exemption for San
Diego.
Their only treatment plant is at Point Loma. Their operation is very similar to the Districts with
advanced primary treatment with an ocean outfall very similar to the Districts, namely, four miles
long and 300 feet deep. They have been working hard to have this legislation approved, along
with another bill that was passed last year, which allowed them to file for a 301(h) waiver much
like what the Districts have. That bill was signed into law and a waiver application has been filed.
They received preliminary, tentative approval and expect the formal tentative ruling, which will
probably be an approval, in about two weeks. In parallel with this action, special legislation which
would give San Diego a perpetual "bye"was put on the Speakers "corrections day" agenda as
Item No. 1 two days ago. The purpose was to particularly highlight the ridiculous federal laws
that continue to exist and it passed by well over 100 votes. The San Diego situation will probably
have some favorable Impact on us by setting precedence but it is also possible that it could have
a reverse effect if the environmental community was to react in a backlash to the generous
provisions of an outright exemption.
The Assistant General Manager of Operations then reported that there was concern about there
being some backlash that would be a result of the Bilbray bill which is now in the Senate. At the
same time that the City was applying for a waiver similar to the Districts and up to a few months
ago, EPA was strenuously opposed to a waiver down in San Diego, as well as much of the
environmental community.
Mr. Anderson further stated that on August 28th the Districts' application will be six years since
we applied for a five-year extension to our existing five-year permit. The Districts have been
operating under the provisions of a 301(h)waiver since 1985. Eleven years have been allowed
out of one, five-year permit due wholly to EPA's inaction on our application. The Districts
continue the marine monitoring program and believe it is important to continue monitoring the
measurements of Districts' effluent from its'treatment plant and to continue to demonstrate that
the Districts are not impacting the environment. That has been the strategy the Districts have
used consistently since the mid-1980s, and was the strategy that allowed the Districts to be the
first recipient of a waiver in the country for large POTWs. It's the strategy that keeps the Districts
in good favor with, and trusted by, EPA, State of California and the environmental community.
ALL DISTRICTS This being the annual meeting fixed by the Boards
Annual Election of Joint Chair of Directors for the election of the Chair of the Joint
Administrative Organization, following a review by
the General Counsel of the balloting procedures, the Secretary stated that Director John C. Cox,
Jr. had been nominated at the regular meeting of the Joint Boards on June 28, 1995, in
accordance with established procedures.
There being no other nominations, the vote was then polled, and the Secretary cast the
unanimous ballot for Director John C. Cox, Jr. as Chair of the Joint Administrative Organization.
`r.
-5-
07/26/95
ALL DISTRICTS This being the annual meeting fixed by the Boards
`.✓ Annual Election of Vice Joint Chair of Directors for the election of the Vice Chair of the
Joint Administrative Organization, the Joint Chair
` then called for nominations for the post,whereupon Directors Daniel T. Welch, Sal A. Sapien,
and Peer A. Swan were nominated.
Director Sal A. Sapien declined the nomination.
The vote was then polled by the balloting procedure as explained by General Counsel. The Joint
Chair then announced that Director Peer A. Swan had been elected to the post of Vice Chair of
the Joint Administrative Organization.
Vice Joint Chair Swan then thanked the Directors for supporting him. He stated that at the end of
the year he would be stepping down from the Irvine Ranch Water District Chairmanship. He also
stated that the Districts pioneered variable rate debt and saved the Districts anywhere from $10-
$70 million in debt financing.
DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or amendments to the
Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held June 28, 1995,
the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed
approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or amendments to the
Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held June 28, 1995,
�.d the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed
approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or amendments to the
Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held June 28, 1995,
the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed
approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or amendments to the
Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held June 28, 1995,
the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed
approved, as mailed.
DISTRICTS There being no corrections or amendments to the
Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held June 28, 1995,
the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed
approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or amendments to the
Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held June 28, 1995,
the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed
approved, as mailed.
6
07/26/95
DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or amendments to the
Aooroval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held June 28, 1995,
the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed
approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or amendments to the
Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held June 28, 1995,
the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed
approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or amendments to the
Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held June 28, 1995,
the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed
approved, as mailed.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ratification of Payment of Joint and
Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual District claims
set forth on exhibits"A"and"B"attached hereto
and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the
respective Boards in the amounts so indicated.
O6/28/95 07/12/95
ALL DISTRICTS
Joint Operating Fund - $615,471.98 $936,231.86
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 76,756.59 287,789.47
Joint Working Capital Fund - 255,664.00 134,867.36
Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 41,882.03 71,739.57
DISTRICT NO. 1 - 1,527.83 69.45
DISTRICT NO. 2 - 9,208.89 3,372.19
DISTRICT NO. 3 - 381,814.92 169,491.71
DISTRICT NO. 5 - 5,836.85 4,610.97
DISTRICT NO. 6 - 1,382.51 51.90
DISTRICT NO. 7 - 21,899.48 6,244.42
DISTRICT NO. 11 - 92,625.24 2,801.59
DISTRICT NO. 13 - 0.00 2.55
DISTRICT NO. 14 - 359,372.16 46.98
DISTRICTS NOS 5 & 6 JOINT - 692.93 2,363.04
DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 211.12 0.00
DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 786.56 20,543.13
$1,865,133.09 $1.640.226.19
-7-
07/26/95
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
`.✓ Awardina Purchase of Anionic
Polvelsotrolyte Chemical Polymer. That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt
Soecification No. "35. to Polvoure. Inc. Resolution No. 95-77, receiving and filing bid
tabulation and recommendation and awarding
contract for Purchase of Anionic Polyelectrolyte Chemical Polymer, Specification No. C-035, to
Polypure, Inc., for the price of$1.69 per pound, plus sales tax, foLa one year pedod beginning
September 1, 1995, with provision for four one-year extensions. Said resolution, by reference
hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing membership in Southern
California Alliance of Publicly Owned That membership in the Southern California
Treatment Works (SCAP) Alliance of Publicly Owned Treatment Works
(SCAP) for the 1995-96 fiscal year, be, and is
hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carded:
Receive and file draft minutes of the
Steedna Committee That the draft minutes of the Steedng Committee
meeting held on June 28, 1995, be, and are
hereby, received and ordered filed.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carded:
Receive and file draft minutes of the
�..i Operations. Maintenance and Technical That the draft minutes of the Operations,
Services Committee Maintenance and Technical Services Committee
meeting held on July 5, 1995, be, and are hereby,
received and ordered filed.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carded:
Receive and file draft minutes of the
Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization That the draft minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re
Study for Administrative Employees Space Utilization Study for Administrative
Employees meeting held on July 6, 1996, be, and
are hereby, received and ordered filed.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive and file draft minutes of the
Plannina. Design and Construction That the draft minutes of the Planning, Design and
Committee Construction Committee meeting held on July 6,
1995, be, and are hereby, received and ordered
filed.
-8-
07/26/95
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive and file draft minutes of the
Finance Administrative and Human That the draft minutes of the Finance,
Resources Committee Administrative and Human Resources Committee
meeting held on July 12, 1995, be, and are
hereby, received and ordered filed. Moved, seconded and duly carried:
ALL DISTRICTS That the draft minutes of the Executive Committee
Receive and file draft minutes of the meeting held on July 19, 1995, as amended by
Executive Committee
Director Guliixson, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed.
ALL DISTRICTS (OMTS95-036) Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing the General Manger to enter
into an Agreement with Southern California That the General Manager be, and is hereby,
Edison re "ENVEST" Program authorized to enter into an Engineering Feasibility
Studies Agreement with Southern California Edison
"ENVEST" Program to study energy conservation measures at the Districts' treatment plants, for
an amount not to exceed $30,000.00.
Director William G. Steiner requested that his abstention be made a matter of record.
ALL DISTRICTS (OMTS95-038) Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Addendum No. 4 to the
Professional Services Agreement with That the Operations, Maintenance and Technical
Ernst &Young providing for additional Services Committee certification of the final
services negotiated fee relative to Addendum No. 4 to the
Professional Services Agreement with Ernst&
Young for development of documentation and training for conducting process improvement
analysis of key programs within the Technical Services Department, be, and is hereby, received
and ordered filed; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 95-79, approving
Addendum No. 4 to said agreement with Ernst& Young for said additional services, for an
additional amount not to exceed $20,000.00, increasing the total authorized compensation from an
amount not to exceed $453,000.00 to an amount not to exceed $473,000.00. Said resolution, by
reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS (POC95-24) Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing staff to issue Purchase order _
to Pioneer-Standard Electronics for two That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue a
VAX 4000 Model 705A Computers for Plant purchase order to Pioneer-Standard Electronics for
No 2 Automation for the Ocean Outfall the Purchase of Two VAX 4000 Model 705A
Booster Station (Specification No. E-257) Computers for Plant No. 2 Plant Automation for the
Ocean Outfall Booster Station (Specification
No. E-257), in an amount not to exceed $357,266.95 plus tax.
Director Mark A. Murphy requested that his abstention be made a matter of record.
_g.
,ash
07/26/95
ALL DISTRICTS (POC95-25) Moved, seconded and duly carried:
`.' Authorizing the Ad Hoc Committee re Space
Utilization Study to solicit negotiate, award That the Ad Hoc Committee re Space Utilization
and issue purchase orders re Modifications Study, be, and is hereby, authorized to solicit,
to the Existing Interior Space in the negotiate, award and Issue purchase orders to
Administration Building for General various vendors for Modifications to the Existing
Management. Administration and Interior Office Spacejn the Administration Building
Communications Offices. Specification for General Management, Administration and
No. E-256 Communications Offices, Specification No. E-256,
in an amended amount not to exceed $130,000.00.
ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR95-31) Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adopting Investment Performance Review
Guidelines for the Districts' Investment That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt
Program Resolution No. 95-78, adopting Investment
Performance Review Guidelines for the Districts'
Investment Program. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these
minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR95-32)
Actions re IRS-approved Section 457
Deferred Compensation Plan
Approving amendment to Deferred Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Compensation Plan for Officers and
`a.✓ Employees That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt
Resolution No. 95-80, approving amendment to
Deferred Compensation Plan for Officers and Employees, providing for greater Flexibility
in plan distribution elections, clarifying certain provisions of the Plan, and complying with
certain recent Internal Revenue Service interpretations. Said resolution, by reference
hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
Approving amended Deferred Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Compensation Program for
Executive Management Group That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt
Employees and Management. Resolution No. 95-81, approving amended
Professional and Supervisory Deferred Compensation Program for Executive
Employees Management Group Employees and Management,
Professional and Supervisory Employees. Said
resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS (FAHR95-341 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Amendment No 13 to
Aoreement for Employment of General That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt
Counsel Resolution No. 95-82, approving Amendment
No. 13 to Agreement for Employment of General
Counsel. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
./ -10-
07/26/95
ALL DISTRICTS (EXEC95-01)
Actions re Consolidation of the Districts
Presentation and discussion Directors expressed concern that it was too soon to
take a position on the consolidation of the Districts
and that there were several issues that needed to be resolved prior to making any
decisions.
The Joint Chair stated that this agenda was requesting approval only, in concept, of the
consolidation process. He further stated that staff will have to go through a filing
process with LAFCO which will take approximately 30-60 days just to compile and
complete the application information, and staff would not take the application to LAFCO
until the Directors had reviewed and approved said application.
Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager of Operations, then gave a brief
presentation on the proposed consolidation of the Districts, as well as General Counsel
who briefly reported on the various options available to the Districts under California law.
Receive and file staff report That the Staff Report dated July 14, 1995,
regarding consolidation of the nine separate
districts, be and is hereby, received and ordered filed.
Approving, in concept. consolidation Moved, seconded and duly carried:
of the nine separate districts into one
single sanitation district That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt
Resolution No. 95-83, approving, in concept,
consolidation of the nine separate districts into one single sanitation district, with a single
board of directors made up of one representative each for every city, sanitary district,
water district and unincorporated portion of the county within the sanitation districts'
service area and now represented on one or more of the existing nine sanitation
districts. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
Directing staff to prepare steps Moved, seconded and duly carried:
necessary to complete a
reorganization of the nine separate That staff be, and is hereby, directed to prepare all
districts into one district steps necessary, including preparing applications
and supporting information to LAFCO, necessary
for the reorganization of the nine separate districts into one district, and to provide same
to the Boards of Directors at a future meeting for its review and approval prior to the
filing of same to LAFCO.
ALL DISTRICTS (EXEC95-03) It was moved and seconded:
Authorizing the General Manager to employ
Judith Wilson at the top of the salary range That the General Manager be authorized to employ ,
for the position of Assistant General Judith Wilson at the top of the salary range for the
Manager-Administration position of Assistant General Manager-
Administration.
A substitute motion was then made to deny the recommendation and eliminate the position.
_11_
07/26/95
`...' The motion failed. It was then duly carried:
That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to employ Judith Wilson at the top of
the salary range for the position of Assistant General Manager-Administration.
Directors John Gullixson, Barry Hammond, Margie Rice and Daniel T. Welch requested that
their opposition to the motion be made a matter of record.
ALL DISTRICTS (EXEC95-04) Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive and file the Finance Function
Review- Final Report of Ernst & Young That the Finance Function Review- Final Report
prepared by Ernst &Young, be, and is hereby,
received and ordered filed.
ALL DISTRICTS Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager of
Status report re County's Comminaled Operations, gave a brief report on the status of the
Investment Pool bankruptcy and the Orange County Investment
Pool. He also reported that staff was studying the
possibility of the Districts purchasing the landfills currently owned and operated by the County of
Orange.
DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adioumment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of
`..� County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned in memory of Jacquelin D. Dunlap, wife of Director
Burnie Dunlap. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:55 p.m.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans
and specifications for Contract No. 2-9-R1 That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and
specifications for Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue
Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-R1, authorizing an addition of$98,030.23 to the contract with
Colich Bros., Inc. dba Colich& Sons, for four items of additional work, and granting a time
extension of eight calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby,
approved.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adioumment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned in memory of Jacquelin D. Dunlap, wife of Director
Burnie Dunlap. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:55 p.m.
-12-
07/26/95
DISTRICTS 3 & 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive, file and deny claim of Colich Bros..
Inc. dba Colich & Sons. for a fuel spill in That the claim of Colich Bros., Inc. dba Colich &
connection with Slater Avenue Pump Sons received June 21, 1995, in the amount of
Station. Contract No. 11-17-1 $300,208.22, plus unspecified additional expenses
and legal expenses, for a fuel spill in connection
with Slater Avenue Pump Station, Contract No. 11-17-1, be, and j, hereby, received, ordered
filed, and denied; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That said claim be, and is hereby, referred to the Districts' General
Counsel and liability claims administrator for appropriate action.
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carded:
Adioumment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned in memory of Jacquelin D. Dunlap, wife of Director
Burnie Dunlap. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:55 p.m.
DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change Order No. 1 to the Plans
and specifications for Contract No. 5.37-3 That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and
specifications for Replacement of Pacific Coast
Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3, Contract No. 5-37-3, for an addition of$60,458.08 to the
contract with Wal-Con Construction Company for two items of additional work, and granting a
time extension of 60 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby,
approved.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adioumment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned in memory of Jacquelin D. Dunlap, wife of Director
Burnie Dunlap. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:55 p.m.
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adioumment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned in memory of Jacquelin D. Dunlap, wife of Director
Burnie Dunlap. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:55 p.m.
DISTRICT 7
Actions re Master Plans prepared by Boyle
Engineering Corporation for Contract
Nos. 7-16, 7-18 and 7-19
Receive and file Master Plan for Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Lemon Heights Sewer System
Contract No. 7-16 That the Master Plan for Lemon Heights Sewer
System, Contract No. 7-16, be, and is hereby,
received and ordered filed.
-13-
07/26/95
Receive and file Master Plan for Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Orange Park Acres Sewer System.
Contract No. 7-18 That the Master Plan for Orange Park Acres Sewer
System, Contract No. 7-18, be, and is hereby,
received and ordered fled.
Receive and file Master Plan for Moved, seconded aqd duly carried:
Cowan Heights Sewer System,
Contract No. 7-19 That the Master Plan for Cowan Heights Sewer
System, Contract No. 7-19, be, and is hereby,
receeved and ordered filed.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adioumment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned in memory of Jacquelin D. Dunlap, wife of Director
Burnie Dunlap. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:55 p.m.
DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adioumment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned in memory of Jacquelin D. Dunlap, wife of
Director Burnie Dunlap. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:55 p.m.
DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
�../ Adioumment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned in memory of Jacquelin D. Dunlap, wife of
Director Burnie Dunlap. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:55 p.m.
DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adioumment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned in memory of Jacquelin D. Dunlap, wife of
Director Burnie Dunlap. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:55 p.m.
Secretary of th oa of Directors
of County Sa tion ' tricts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, , , 7, 11, 13 and 14
`" -14-
FUNDNO 91M JT DISTWORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE MI/95 PAGE1
REPORTNUMBERAP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID MOMS POSTING DATE 0SQ8/BS
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPRON
145416 AC DELCO SYSTEMS E612.11 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145417 ASK CORPORATION $1.628.17 GAUGE
145418 ASR ANALYSIS 5516.50 PUMPANALYSIS
146419 ATM AA,INC. 5765.00 LAB SERVICES
145420 AT&T-PROWATTS $151.89 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
145421 ADVANCED MFG.INSTITUTE $1.590.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION-MTCE PLANNING&SCHEDULING
14MV ALBERTSONS MARKET 5604 E221.02 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
14MM ALLTEK CIRCUIT,INC. $1.940.66 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145424 AMERIDATA $1,168.01 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
145425 AMERICAN AIR FILTER,INC. $1.217.58 FILTERS
145426 AMERICAN POWER PRODUCTS $781.77 TRUCK PARTS
145427 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION 54,500.00 SEWER REPAIRS
145428 ANIXTER-DISTRIBUTION $9,155.77 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
145429 ABC LABORATORIES E1.395A0 LAB SERVICES
m 14MM AQUATIC CENTER $1.020.00 SAFETY SUPPLIES
X 145431 ARROWHEAD ELECTRIC CORP. SK06.92 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
2 145432 ARROWHEAD PRODUCTS E1,323.05 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145433 ASSOCIATED VACUUM TECH.,INC. $945.98 PUMP PARTS
to 145434 AMSA 9425.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION-AMSA TECHNICAL CONF.
146435 ATKIN/JONES COMPUTER SERVICE $321.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT
D 145Kn AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING 5199.77 PAYROLL SERVICES
145437 BANANA BLUEPRINT $9,392.96 PRINTING M.O.11-07-94
F-- 14MM BARTLETT CENTER $624.41 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145439 BAUER COMPRESSOR $139.12 COMPRESSOR PARTS
146440 BAXTER EDWARDS $1.550.72 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145441 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $1.893.90 LAB SUPPLIES
145442 BONJVRUES 5371.88 TRUCK PARTS
145W3 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP 524,634.66 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-7-1,3J8
1454W BRENNER-FIEDLER&ASSOC..INC. $298.15 COMPRESSOR PARTS
145WS BRISTOL INDUSTRIES $670.00 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
14544E BUDGETJANITORW. $3,330.00 JANITORIAL SERVICES /
145447 CS COMPANY $162.20 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
14544E CALFON CONSTRUCTION E352,1W.00 CONSTRUCTION 3.38.2
145W9 CAL-PAC CHEMICAL CO.,INC. 5363.31 CHEMICALS
145450 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $1,101.72 SERVICEAGREEMENT
145451 CALIFORNIA FINEBLANKING CORP. $4.480.61 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145452 JOHN D.CASE&ASSOC. $995.00 SECURITY CONSULTANT
145453 CENTURY SAFETY INST.&SUPPLY $4.250.14 SAFETY SUPPLIES
14MM CERFNET $37.40 COMPUTER SERVICES
14USS CHANDLER LIQUID ASSET NOW. $2,IW.W INVESTMENT CONSULTANT M.O.2-395
145456 CIMCO E913.W REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145457 CINEDOME THEATRES $228.90 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
146450 COAST RUBBER STAMP 694.17 OFFICESUPPLIES
I0. m COUCH&SONS $05.120.00 CONSTRUCTION 11-17-1
14MW COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA E1,418.30 FITTINGS
145481 COMPUSA,INC. $312.45 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
FUND NO 9199 - UT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE V 21195 PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMSPAIDO&28K95 POSTINGDATE0 QW5
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
145462 CONNEL GM PARTS/DIV. $262.01 TRUCK PARTS
145463 CON-WAYWESTERNEXPRESS $113.14 FREIGHTCHARGES
145464 CONSUMER PIPE 549.94 MECHANICAL PARTS
145465 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $1,11862 INSTRUMENT PARTS
145466 CORANADO SQUARE $1.450.20 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145467 COUNTERPART ENTERPRISES $2,107A4 COMPRESSOR PARTS
145468 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $1,263.96 ELECTRIC PARTS
145469 CHARLES P.CROAL Y.CO. $2,570.74 INSTRUMENT PARTS
145470 CUSTOM ENAMELERS,INC. $1,427AI REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145471 SWRCB/AFRS $1,000.00 MEMBERSHIP FEE
145472 DATA ELECTRONICS SER. $3W N REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145473 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIF. 548.019.55 DENTAL INSURANCE PLAN M.0.1-12-M
145474 DEL TACO 026 $1,771.84 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145475 DENNY'S RESTAURANT 01509 $461.79 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
m 145478 DEZURICK ANDIOR CS CO. $4,232.11 VALVES
X 145477 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. 55,18060 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
= 145478 DIGITAL LEARNING CENTER $8,70060 TRAINING REGISTRATION-SUPPORTING WINDOWS NT
w 145479 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $999.49 PAINT SUPPLIES
145480 DWYER INSTRUMENT,INC. $218.79 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
-1 14MBI ESP NORTH 3508]4 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
n 145482 EATON CORPIMSC PRODUCTS $304.11 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145483 EDWARDS DIV.OF GS BLDG SYS. $146.14 SAFETY SUPPLIES
IJ 14544 ELECTAIRTOOLCO. $6,711.82 MECHANICAL PARTS
145485 ENCHANTER,INC. $3,920.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6.1092
14MM EVANS CONSOLES $23.020.79 COMPUTER SOFTWARE CONSULTANT
145487 MARSHALL FAIRRES $28.08 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
14548E FARR SALES B SERVICE $808.14 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
145489 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $335.97 FILTERS
145490 FISCHER 8 PORTER CO. 5808.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS
145491 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $553,33 LAB SUPPLIES
145482 FLUORAMICS.INC. 6312.56 OPERATING SUPPLIES 1
145493 FOUNTAINVALLEYCAMERA $81.81 PHOTO SUPPLIES
145494 THE FOXBORO CO. $1.733.0 INSTRUMENT PARTS
145495 FRANCE COMPRESSOR PRODUCTS $11,50.27 COMPRESSOR PARTS
145498 GST,INC. 54,613.66 OFFICE SUPPLIES
145497 GSF ENERGY,INC. 54,063.81 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145496 GALLADE CHEMICAL,INC. $178.97 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145499 GAMAHLLUMBERCO. $1,734.26 LUMBER8IAROWARE
145500 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $436.39 CHEMICALS
145501 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $716.88 ELECTRIC PARTS
145502 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. 56,982.06 TELEPHONE SERVICES
145503 GEORGE B SONS COIN-OP LAUNDRY $210.00 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145504 GIERUCH-MITCHELL,INC. $2,07.29 MECHANICAL PARTS
145505 GRAHAM MANUFACTURING CO.,INC. $508.86 PUMP PARTS
145M GRASBY S.T.I. $58920 INSTRUMENT PARTS
145W7 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $2,070.05 OFFICE SUPPLIES
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 621N5 PAGE 3
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 062M95 POSTING DATE 0&28195
WARRANTNO. VENDOR AMOUNT
145508 DAVID M.GRIFFITH&ASSOC. SI3,9XLW PROF.SERV.-EXECUTIVE SEARCH
145509 H KOCH&SONS $53.16 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145510 W PENNY INN ANAHEIM 8650AI REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145511 MACH COMPANY $105.84 LAB SUPPLIES
145512 FREDA HARPER $1.100.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
145513 HATCH&KIRK INC. $2.090.94 MECHANICAL PARTS
145514 PL HAWN CO,INC. SWIM FILTERS
145515 HOME DEPOT $405.73 HARDWARE
145516 HUGHES AIRCRAFT $531.08 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145511 HUNTINGTON SUPPLY $134.69 HARDWARE
145518 ORANGE COUNTY FED.CREDIT UNION 888D.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
145519 ICN BIOMEDICALS,INC. 8284.85 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
14020 IEEE SERVICE CENTER-007 891.00 PUBLICATION
146621 IPCO SAFETY &18,235.91 SAFETY SUPPLIES
FTl 145522 ISLUACONFERENCE $525.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION
146523 ITT CANNON ELECTRIC P5344 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
= t45524 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $46,380.79 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11-18-92
145525 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $2,217,09 CONNECTORS
to 145526 INTEC PRODUCTS,INC. $1.702.97 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
--4 145527 INTERSTATE ELECTRONICS CORP. $51125 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
n 145520 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT 831.64 WATER USE
145529 J2 PRINTING SERVICES 836GI9 PRINTING
1sl 145530 JAMISON ENGINEERING $11,178.12 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
145531 GREATVJESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY. 81,262.84 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
145632 JT LEE INVESTMENT 8289.22 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145533 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $633.08 ELECTRIC PARTS
1455M JONATHAN MANUFACTURING 81,169JU REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
14505 GEORGE A.JONES 9399.28 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145536 KING BEARING,INC. 81,004.88 MACHINE SUPPLIES
14037 KINSBURSKY BROS.SUPPLY $218.65 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145538 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $3.431.34 TOOLS 1
145539 KOM KAI MOBILE HOME PARK $1.215.55 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145540 LA OUINTA MOTOR INN 6206.78 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145541 LATRONICS 5323.22 TRAINING EQUIPMENT
145542 LAWICRANDAL,INC. 8920.CD LEGAL SERVICES M.0.7-131NI
145543 FOX LAWSON&ASSOC, $3,518.0D PROFESSIONAL SERVICES-MPRP
145W LEARNING TREE INTERNATIONAL $1.995.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING REGISTRATION
145545 LEE&RO CONSULTING ENGR. $5,410.13 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1.40-1
145546 IA LIQUID HANDLING SYSTEMS $3,613.75 PUMP PARTS
145547 MPS 8441.08 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
146648 R.F.MACDONALD CO. $30D.00 INSTRUMENTREPAIRS
t45549 MACOMOO $577.20 SERVICE AGREEMENT
145550 MACTEMPS $540.00 TEMPORARY PERSONNEL
145551 MAG SYSTEMS $342.16 INSTRUMENTPARTS
14052 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS,INC. $1,502.04 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
145553 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. 91,898.00 CONSTRUCTION P242-2
FUND NO SIN JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE MINTS PAGE4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID OBFIBI9S POSTING DATE MI2M5
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
1455M MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS E210.85 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
145555 MCKENNA ENGR.&EQUIP. $1,087.50 PUMP PARTS
145556 MEASUREMENT VARIABLES $289.02 ELECTRIC PARTS
14507 MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. E172.M INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
14058 MICROBIAL INSIGHTS,INC. $600.00 CONSULTING SERVICES M.O.11.18-92
145559 MIDWAY MFG.&MACHINING 54,180.37 PUMP PARTS
145M0 MILLETT INDUSTRIES $88.20 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145561 MISSION ABRASIVE SUPPLIES E135.37 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
145582 MISSION INDUSTRIES 53,796.25 UNIFORM RENTALS
145563 MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION IIU3,910.54 CONSTRUCTION 14-14A
145564 MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE S10,OM.00 RATING SERVICE MAINTENANCE FEES
145565 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $70.35 SAFETY FILM RENTALS
145%6 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $199.60 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
145587 NEUTRON $3,507.07 ANIONIC POLYMER M.O.&I0.94
1455M NORTEL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS 58,262.W TELEPHONE SERVICE AGREEMENT
m 145569 NOVA POWER,INC. E6,304.00 MECHANICALTESTING
X 1455M OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES 5452.39 SAFETYGLASSES
2
145572 THEOHORANGE COUNTY
E8,029.91 TRAINING REGISTRATION-GAUGE SAFETYrtECH.TRAININ0
W 1d55]2 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. $29.91 TRUCK PARTS
145573 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $1.855.26 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
14074 ORANGE COURIER $267.30 COURIER SERVICES
]? 145575 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. $1,074.43 FITTINGS
r 14MM OXYGEN SERVICE $2,177.05 SPECIALTY GASES
145577 P&D ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES $3,458.51 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY
145578 PSSI E) AI SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION
145579 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY E4,050.96 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
145680 PACIFIC PARTS $5,671.27 INSTRUMENT PARTS
145M1 PACIFIC BELL $1.179.0 TELEPHONE SERVICES
145M PACIFIC WATER CONDITIONING CO. E299.00 EQUIPMENT RENTALS
14093 PAGENET $967.49 RENTALEQUIPMENT
1455M PALMIERI,TYLER,WIENER, $40.00 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.8.12-911
145MS PARTS UNLIMITED $366.30 TRUCK PARTS
1455M COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $5,780.08 REIMS.PETTY CASH,MINING&TRAVEL
145557 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. E127,4M.26 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.54L91
145MS PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS S962.74 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
145S89 POHLSON,MOORHEAD&GOETHALS $1.501.50 CAL-0SHA INVESTIGATION
145590 POLYMETRICS,INC. $1,262.75 LAB SUPPLIES
145591 POLYPURE,INC. M,660.51 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-92
145592 POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO. $288.99 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
145593 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE S25S.00 ICE
1455N PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY $1,687.04 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145595 RBC TRANSPORT DYNAMICS $625.90 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145596 RD SYSTEMS,INC. $701.01 CARD READER REPAIRS
145597 RJN COMPUTER SERVICES,INC. $5,490.21 TRAINING REGISTRATION-CRAMS TRAINING
145S98 R&RINSTRUMENTS S302S7 INSTRUMENT PARTS
145M DR.SHIVAJI RAMAUNGAM $228.23 LAB SUPPLIES (`
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE MIMS PAGES
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMSPAID06128195 POSTINGDATEOMS95
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
145600 RISEN MARINE STUDIES,INC. $720.00 OCEAN MONITORING
145601 REMEDYTEMP 53,924.98 TEMPORARY PERSONNEL SERVICES
145602 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $1.379.11 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
145603 ROMAC SUPPLY COMPANY $60614 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
145604 RYAN-HERCO $211.41 PUMP
145805 SAFETY WEST $570.43 INSTRUMENT PARTS
145608 SANOR BIO-INDUSTRIES $3,464.45 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145607 SAWA FE PACIFIC PIPELINE $2W.38 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145608 SANWA BANK $14,456.38 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION-14-1-1A
14MM SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTL E185,484.22 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6 041
145510 R.CRAIG SCOTT&ASSOC. $3.108.58 LEGAL SERVICES-PERSONNEL ISSUES
145611 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $598.07 SPECIALTY GASES
145512 SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS,INC. $358.00 LAB SUPPLIES
14013 SEA COAST DESIGNS 5986.07 OFFICE FURNITURE
rn 145614 SHURELUCK SALES $2.838.12 TOOL501ARDWARE
X 145615 SKALAR,INC. S227J9 LAB SUPPLIES
= 145616 SKYLINE DISPLAYS &31.94 TRAINING MATERIALS
b~U 145617 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $490.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS
145618 M.LEE SMITH PUBLISHERS $487.W SUBSCRIPTION
145619 SMITH PIPE&SUPPLY $289.11 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
145620 - SO CALIF.EDISON 0O. $45.615.17 POWER
Dj 145621 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. SU4,248A3 NATURALGAS
LJl 145022 SOUTHERNCOUNTIESOILCO. $8.982.83 DIESEWNLEADED FUEL
145623 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER 52,837.06 DRINKING WATERICOOLER RENTALS
145624 WESTALLOY,INC. $74.07 WELDING SUPPLIES
145625 SPECIAL PLASTIC SYSTEMS,INC. $16824 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
14MM SPEX INDUSTRIES,INC. $192.70 LABSUPPLIES
145627 SPIVECO,INC. E1,940.95 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145628 STONE CONTAINER CORP. $5,00530 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145629 SUPELCO,INC. SIME5 LAB SUPPLIES
146630 SUPERB ONE-HOUR PHOTO $12.21 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
145631 TON ASSOCIATES $822.20 LAB SUPPLIES
14032 TAC WEST,INC. $1.210.51 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
14W33 TEKORAULICS $9.051.17 PUMP PARTS
146634 TELE-CELL,INC. $201.17 COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES
145535 TEXAS COMMERCE BANK 56,503.12 COP TRUSTEE SERVICES
14MM THOMPSON PUBLISHING GROUP $207.00 PUBLICATION
145637 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $728.85 MECHANICAL PARTS
145638 TOWS LOCK&SAFE SERVICE $199.35 LOCKS&KEYS
145639 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES $2,503.50 TRAVEL SERVICES M.O.".94
145640 TRIPLE M PACKING $8.192.27 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145641 TROPICAL PIMA NURSERY,INC. $4,MAS CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.O.5-11-94
14 12 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. EBB5.89 TRUCK PARTS
145843 TRUESDAIL LABS $99.00 LAB SERVICES
145644 JG TUCKER&SON,INC. $271.84 FILTERS
145646 U.S.C.SPONSORED PROJECTS ACCT. $14.396.08 TECHNICAL SERVICES
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6 IMS PAGES
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID DISMISS POSTING DATE O6120195
WARRANT NO. VENDOR
145646 ULTRASCIENTIFIC $153.00 LAB SUPPLIES
145647 UNISOURCEWOR BUTLER PAPER $9.126.31 OFFICE SUPPLIES
145MB VWR SCIENTIFIC 54,057.23 LAB SUPPLIES
145US VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $5.780.12 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
145650 VALLEY CREST LANDSCAPE,INC. $2,D24.00 LANDSCAPING EQUIPMENT
14MI VALLEY VIEW SHOPPING CENTER 3235.11 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145652 VARIAN ASSOCIATES,INC. $730.85 LAB SUPPLIES
145653 WEFTEC'95 $880.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION-WEF ANNUAL CORR
145654 WALKER CUSTOM POWDER COATING 5232.16 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145655 GUY L.WARDEN B SONS $1,082.02 ENGINE PARTS
145858 WAXIE $380.94 JANITORIALSUPPLIES
145657 WEBBER AIRCRAFT,INC. $3.191.00 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145658 WESTAMERICANRUBBERCO. $2,518.W REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145659 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY 534,716.02 CAUSTIC SODA&HYPOCHLORIDE M.O.8-12-92&4.13-94
f1l 145680 WEST.LITESUPPLYCO. $4,494.5E ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
x 145861 WESCO $3,509.35 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
= 14WU WILLAMETTE INDUSTRIES,INC. $247.21 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145563 WILLOWICK ROYAL MOBILEHOME $1.201.17 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
bbOO 145W WTTEG $162.43 LAB SUPPLIES
145M XEROX CORP. 57.50 .72 COPIER LEASES
145668 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $1.020.19 LAB SUPPLIES
b
145667 RICIARD B.EDGAR $200.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
$1.865,133.09
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE B121/95 PAGE 7
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 08128195 POSTING DATE MOMS
SUMMARY AMOUNT
01 OPER FUND $576.03
XI CONSTR.FUND 3951.00
02 OPER FUND 2,467.80
X2 CAP FAC FUND 3,45B.51
02 CONSTR.FUND 3,282.50
X3 OPER FUND 10,979.03
03 CAP FAC FUND 388p80.89
03 CONSTR.FUND 2,T75.00
05OPERFUND 5AW.35
XS CONSTR.FUND 870.50
XB OPER FUND 238.01
XB CAP FAC FUND 808.00
X
X0 CONSTR.FUND 538.50
= W OPEN FUND 12,258.28
X7 CAP FAG FUND 8,745.72
X7 CONSTR.FUND 895.50
X11 OPER FUND 2AWA2
X11 CAP FAC FUND 89,335.42
n X11 CONSTR.FUND 007.00
V 014 OPER FUND 15.24
014 CAP FAC FUND 359,356.92
XSMM CAP FAC FUND 892.93
097 OPER FUND 211.12
07814 OPER FUND 785.58
JT OPER FUND 615.471.98
CORE 70.768.59
SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND 41,882.03
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL 255,884.00 /
1,885,133.09
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/05/95 PAGE 1
REPORTNUMBERAP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 07/12MS POSTING DATE 07/12/95
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
145731 ABB SERVICE CO. $4,690.94 MACHINE REPAIRS
145732 AFCEA INTERNATIONAL HDORTS. $290.00 COMPUTER TRAINING REGISTRATION
145733 AG TECH COMPANY $73,346.83 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10.9.91
1457M AOX CORPORATION $1,306.54 GAUGE
145735 AT&T-PROWATTS $2,560.76 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
145738 AT&T-MEGACOM SERVICE S987.80 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
145737 AT&T-UNIPLAN SERVICE S36.77 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
145738 ACTION DOOR REPAIR CORP. $587.64 DOOR REPAIRS
145739 ADVANCED WELDER REPAIR $358.06 WELDER REPAIRS
145740 AIR COLD SUPPLY,INC. $164.51 AIR CONDITIONER PARTS
145741 ALLOY DIE CASTING $82.56 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145742 ALPHA OMEGA $373.92 LAB REPAIRS
145743 AMERICATA $441.69 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
1457" AMERICAN SIGMA S2,145.38 SAMPLER PARTS
m 145745 BLAKE P.ANDERSON $151.24 REIMBURSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE
X 145740 ANIXTER-DISTRIBUTION $295.45 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
= 145747 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $1.733.33 NOTICES&ADS
�--� 145740 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) S503.20 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
145749 ARMOR-VAC $1.140.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES
145750 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SEW. $105.W WASTE OIL REMOVAL
hl 145751 - ASSOCIATED CONCRETE PRODUCTS $110,90 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
1 1457V RANDOLPH AUSTIN CO. $633.93 LAB SUPPLIES
I--' 145753 AWARDS&TROPHIES $25.27 PLAQUES
145754 BFI MEDICAL WASTE SYSTEMS $43.W WASTE DISPOSAL
14570 BATTERY SPECIALTIES S430.27 BATTERIES
14570 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. 53,567.90 LAB SUPPLIES
145757 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. 5250.05 TRUCK WASH TICKE7S
145758 BISHOP COMPANY $839.17 TOOLS
145759 BLOOMBERG LP. $4.832.59 FINANCIAL MONITORING M.O.i14-93
146760 BOOT BARN $123.80 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES
145761 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. S666.17 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES /
145M C.LTECHNOLOGY E720.0D GAS ANALYSIS SERVICES
METED CS COMPANY $1.412.24 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
145764 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC DATE $424.05 SERVICE AGREEMENT
14570 CALLAN ASSOCIATES,INC. $25,011 INVESTMENTADVISOR SEARCH M.0.2-M5
145M CANUS CORPORATION $1,057.24 FIBER OPTIC CABLE
145767 JOHN D.CASE&ASSOC. $2.436.22 CONSULTING SERVICES
145788 CENTURY SAFETY INST.&SUPPLY $1,593.60 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
145769 CHEM SEARCH SSW.33 PIPING PARTS
145770 COAST RUBBER STAMP $51.72 OFFICE SUPPLIES
145771 COSTAL VIDEO COMMUNICATION $1C0.55 SAFETY FILM RENTALS
145772 COMPUSA,INC. $132.11 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
145773 COMPUSERVE SGUA4 COMPUTER SERVICES
145774 CONSOLIDATED REPOGRAPHICS S89.13 PRINTING SERVICES
1457/5 CONSUMER PIPE SIp58.51 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
145776 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC. $735.48 TOOLS (1`
FUNONO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7105195 PAGE
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMSPAID07/12A5 POSTING DATE O7/IM5
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
145777 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO. $870.W CHLORINE NLOA1 11.93
145778 CONTROL CONCEPTS CORP. SW1.83 ELECTRIC PARTS
145779 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS O C $1,3W.65 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SERVICES M.0.8-11-93
1457M COUNTERPART ENTERPRISES $5W.M MECHANICAL PARTS
145781 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $898.72 ELECTRIC PARTS
145702 CHARLES P.CROWLEY,CO. $818.61) PUMP PARTS
145783 DOUGIAS J.DAVIS&ASSOC.,INC. $3,000.00 SAFETY EVALUATION SERVICES
1457M DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIF. $39,154.02 DENTAL INSURANCE PLAN MO.1.12-N
145785 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $1,329.92 SERVICE AGREEMENT
145788 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY 594D.W ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE
145787 ROBERT F.DRIVER ASSOC. $21,662.00 PERSONNEL INSURANCE CONSULTANT
145786 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $2.022.38 PAINT SUPPLIES
145789 ESP NORTH $1,968.82 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
145790 EASTMAN.INC. $5.U7.03 OFFICE SUPPLIES
m 145791 ECOANALYSIS,INC. 51,028.50 CONSULTING SERVICES
X 145792 ELECTRO TEST.INC. $9.990.W METER
s 146793 EMERGENCYMGMTNETWORK win SAFETY SUPPLIES
1457N ENCHANTER,INC. $1.680.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.&1&92
145795 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $760.50 LAB SERVICES
-1 145796 ERNSTSYOUNG SW,874.00 FINANCE 9 TECH.SERVICES REVIEWS M.O9-14-94
m 146797 EVENTUS SOFTWARE $1,777.10 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
I 145798 FLUID TECH.SALES $01746 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
N 145799 FNWVALVECOMPANY $8W.46 VALVES
145M FST SAND AND GRAVEL.INC. $166.39 ROADSASEMATERIALS
145801 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $7.972.50 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.104491
145802 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $339.10 AIR FREIGHT
145W3 FIBERTRON $99SM FIBER OPTIC CABLE
1458N FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $3.WS.M LAB SUPPLIES
145805 FISIONS INSTRUMENTS $41.95 LAS SUPPLIES
14MM FLICKINGER CO. $444.44 VALVES
145807 FLO-SYSTEMS INC. $36.246.62 PUMP PARTS /
145808 FOUNTAINVALLEY CAMERA $38.40 PHOTOSUPPLIES
1455DD FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT SMI.23 PAINT SUPPLIES
145810 FRY'S ELECTRONICS $472.98 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
145811 EST.INC. $2,680.61 OFFICE SUPPLIES
145812 CITY OF GARDEN GROVE 52.IM.00 MANHOLE ADJUSTING
145813 GENERAL BINDING CORP. $1.725.14 OFFICE SUPPLIES
145814 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $650.53 ELECTRIC PARTS
145815 GENERALTELEPHONECO. 51,049.117 TELEPHONE SERVICES
145816 GIERLICHMITCHELL,INC. $1,612.93 PUMP PARTS
145817 GOVT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOC. 51,250.W PUBLICATIONS
145818 WW GRAINGER,INC. $924.79 HARDWARE
145819 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $1,486.95 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
145820 GRASSYS.T.I. 53.357.99 ENGINE PARTS
145821 DAVID R.GRIFFIN $118,449.45 LEGAL SERVICES-TECHRE PIPE M.0.11,14-94
145822 HUTCH 9 KIRK,INC. $757.83 MECHANICAL PARTS
FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7AI5195 PAGE
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 07/12/05 POSTING DATE 0711M5
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
145823 PL HAWN CO,INC. $607.62 FILTERS
145824 HELPMATES PERSONNEL SERVICES $81SM TEMPORARY PERSONNEL SERVICES
145825 HEWLETT PACKARD CO. S1d.39 LAB SUPPLIES
145828 HILTI,INC. $1,198.04 TOOLS
145027 HOME DEPOT $437.21 HARDWARE
145028 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $98.95 HARDWARE
145529 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $15,792.75 WATER USE
145830 HUNTINGTON SUPPLY $24.24 HARDWARE
145831 HYCLONE LABORATORIES,INC. $555.08 LAB SUPPLIES
145832 IPCO SAFETY $1,418.44 SAFETY SUPPLIES
14033 IMAGING PLUS.INC. 5885.53 OFFICE SUPPLIES
140M IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $95.542.33 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.D.11-1 SA2
145835 INDUSTRIAL SAFETY SHOE CO. $3.381.97 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES
14MM INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $135.12 CONNECTORS
m 145837 IWL HOUSE OF PANCAKES 0 $128.69 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
y� 1458M INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $1,159.45 BATTERIES
2 145W9 INTERSPIRO $912A2 SAFETY SUPPLIES
14SUO IRVINE PHOTO GRAPHICS $27.08 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
to 145MI IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $5.54 WATER USE
-1 145842 AT COMPUTER SOURCE,INC. $2.048.88 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
145543 JAMISON ENGINEERING $4,651.&1 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
145844 GREATWESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY. $790.27 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
W 145545 JOBS AVAILABLE S220.00 NOTICES BADS
145845 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $070.21 ELECTRIC PARTS
145047 KIMMERLE BROS,INC. $T55.72 PUMP
145848 KING BEARING,INC. $1.453.03 MACHINE SUPPLIES
145849 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $1,078.38 TOOLS
145OW L A CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. S915.80 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES
145851 LATRONICS $814.11 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT
f45852 LAIDLAW ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES $15,957.55 WASTE DISPOSAL SERVICES
145853 LEHMAN BROTHERS,INC. $129.306.30 TCCP INTEREST M.0.1.2-94 1
145854 LOS ANGELES TIMES $170.20 SUBSCRIPTION
145855 MBC APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL $972.05 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.9-1G92
1450M MPS $93.75 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
14507 MACTEMPS $300,00 TEMPORARY PERSONNEL SERVICES
145858 MAG SYSTEMS $847.27 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
145859 MAGNETEK $3.318.82 ELECTRIC METER
1458M MANLEYS BOILER REPAIR CO,INC. $325.00 BOILER CLEANING
145061 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $500.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
145082 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $187,078.00 CONSTRUCTION P242.2
145003 MARIE CALLANDERS PIES 341 $135.00 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
145884 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $235.35 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
145W5 MCCOY SHEET METAL WORKS,INC. $172.40 FITTINGS
145M MIDWAY MFG.S MACHINING $883.55 PUMP PARTS
145857 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3,240.44 UNIFORM RENTALS
145888 MITCHELLINSTRUMENTCO. $190.00 ELECTRIC PARTS
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7MMIS PAGE
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 07/12MS POSTING DATE 07/12/95
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
145889 MORELAND&ASSOCIATES $9,977.50 FINANCIAL AUDIT SERVICES M.O.34L95
145870 MOTOROLA.INC. $372.041 INSTRUMENTPARTS
145871 NAT WEST MARKETS $750.00 C.O.P.LIQUIDITY FEES
145872 NATIONAL ENVIRO.INFO.SERV. $161.50 LABSUPPLIES
145873 NEAL SUPPLY CO. S1,9N.08 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
145874 NEUTRON $7,024.40 ANIONIC POLYMER M.O.S-IDN
145075 NEW HORIZONS COMPUTER CENTER $2,000.00 COMPUTER TRAINING REGISTRATION
145876 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $36,90 WATERUSE
145577 CUMMINS CAL FACIONAN $19D.74 ELECTRIC PARTS
14507E ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $7,139.30 ELECTRIC PARTS
145879 ORANGE COURIER $152.55 COURIER SERVICES
145ND ORANGE VALVE&FITTING 0O. $1,168.09 FITTINGS
145051 OXYGEN SERVICE $1,555.70 SPECIALTY GASES
145802 PSSI $2,325.15 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION
m 145883 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY 5640.11 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
X 14580a PACIFIC PARTS 531,488.31 FIBER OPTIC EQUIPMENT
2 145885 PACIFIC BELL $4&75 TELEPHONE SERVICES
OU 14%86 NORTEL COMMUNICATIONS SYST. $1,089.22 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS
145887 PALLETS&ACCESSORIES CO, $1,544.0 WAREHOUSE SUPPLIES
—� 1458H PARAGON CABLE $38.78 CABLE SERVICES
145889 PARKHOUSE TIRE CO. $191.88 TRUCKPARTS
145890 PASCAL&LUDWIG $22.254.00 CONSTRUCTION PI 42&P249
p 145891 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $12,016.51 REIMS,PETTY CASH,TRAINING&TRAVEL
145892 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $279,074.40 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.5-0-91
145893 PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS 523,252.4E CMAS COMPUTER HARDWARE/SOFTWARE
145894 POLYPURE.INC. $17,987.19 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11.92
145895 POSTMASTER $172.00 POST OFFICE BOX RENTAL
1458N HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $90.00 ICE
145897 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE IND. $4,412.00 SOIL TESTING
145898 PULSAFEEDER 5482.83 PUMP PARTS
145899 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $103.44 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS /
145M R&R INSTRUMENTS $347.81 INSTRUMENT PARTS
145NI DR.SHIVAJI RAMALINGAM $220.23 LAB SUPPLIES
1459D2 REBIS $11,871.45 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
145903 REMEDYTEMP $754.80 TEMPORARY PERSONNEL SERVICES
1459M MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $74.90 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
145905 RMMEASUREMENTANDCONTROL 59,669.60 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
145M SANTAANA ELECTRIC MOTORS $1,225,30 ELECTRIC PARTS
145907 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $90.45 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
1459M SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $1,10336 SPECIALTY GASES
145M SEA SYSTEMS 31."0A0 CURRENT METER STUDY
145910 SEWER EQUIP CO.OF AMERICA $120337 TOOLS
145911 SHURELUCK SALES $11,907.39 TOOLSRIARDWARE
145912 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO. $130.39 LAB SUPPLIES
145913 THE SMITH GROUP 99,95620 TECHNICAL SERVICES STUDY
145914 SMITH PIPE&SUPPLY INC. $126," PLUMBING SUPPLIES
FUND NO 9189 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7105195 PAGE 5
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CWMSPAID071IMS POSTING DATE0711Z195
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
145915 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. $53,367.74 POWER
145916 SO.CALIF.WATER CO. 542.23 WATER USE
145917 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. $489.21 DIESEWNLEADED FUEL
145918 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER $13.50 DRINKING WATEPJCOOLER RENTALS
145919 SPARLING INSTRUMENT CO.,INC. $250.00 METER -
145920 SUMMIT STEEL $009.97 METAL
145921 SUNSETFORD $116.35 TRUCK PARTS
145922 SUPELCO,INC. $101.19 LAB SUPPLIES
145923 TARGET $204.27 GROUNDSKEEPING SUPPLIES
145924 TEXMATE,INC. $189.14 INSTRUMENTPARTS
145925 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $240.25 MECHANICAL PARTS
145820 ELIZABETH KYLE THOMPSON $W2.85 LIABILITY CLAIM
145927 TONER SYSTEM INTERNATIONAL $1,020.55 PRINTINGSUPPLIES
145928 TONrS LOCK 8 SAFE SERVICE $96.62 LOCKS 6 KEYS
m 145929 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES $2.121.60 TRAVEL SERVICES M.0.6&94
X 145930 TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY.INC. $3,973.84 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.O.St 1-94
= 145931 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $1,463.67 TRUCK PARTS
1459M TRUESDAIL LABS 83.245.65 LAB SERVICES
m 14W33 JO TUCKER&SON,INC. $202.15 INSTRUMENT PARTS
--I 1459M TUSTIN DODGE 623.84 TRUCK PARTS
145935 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $197.00 LAB SUPPLIES
1459M UNDERSEA GRAPHICS.INC. E14.000.00 OUTFALL REPAIRS
vl 14%37 UNISOURCEWOR BUTLER PAPER 8450.20 OFFICE SUPPLIES
145938 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $1.053.60 PARCEL SERVICES
145939 VWR SCIENTIFIC 8104.09 LAB SUPPLIES
14SWO VERTEX COMPUTER CABLE PRODUCTS SI.053.19 FIBEROFTICCABLE
145941 VILLAGE NURSERIES $69.62 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES
F15942 CARLWARRENBCO. $1.209.70 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR
145943 WME 82,081.98 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
145W WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $38.357.15 CAUSTIC SODA 6 HYPOCHLORIDE M.O.6-12.92 6 4-13.94
145%5 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $171.33 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES )
145946 WESCO $840.45 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
145847 WITEG $291.76 LAB SUPPLIES
145948 ROURKE,WOODRUFF B SPRADLIN 968,54L04 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.2-IM2
145949 XEROX CORP. E759.64 COPIER LEASES
1459W GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $831.21 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
14NSI YORBA ORANGE GROWERS ASSOC. 81,686.36 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 0711MS 91,840,22619
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 7MMS PAGES
REPORT NUMBERAP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 07112/95 POSTING DATE D7H2195
SUMMARY AMOUNT
01 CONSTR FUND $89.45
02 OPER FUND 2.676.67
02 CAP FAC FUND 296.64
82 CONSTR FUND 196.88
83 OPER FUND 31,505.08
93 CAP FAC FUND 137.773.85
03 CONSTR FUND 212.78
05OPERFUND 4,547.37
85 CONSTR FUND 83.81)
06 CONSTR FUND 51.9D
07 OPER FUND M70.64
m 07 CONSTR FUND 73.56
X 811 OPER FUND 828.31
= 011 CAP FAC FUND 1,909.00
m 011 CONSTR FUND 64.28
013 CONSTR FUND 2.55
-1 614 CAP FAC FUND 32.00
Tb 014 CONSTR FUND 14.96
1 0%S OPER FUND 2,W3.04
87514 OPEN FUND 20,543.13
J<OPER FUND 938,231.86
cow 287,789.41
SELFFUNDED INSURANCE FUND 71.M9.57
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL 13g887.36
$1,610,226.19
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
) SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, 1 hereby certify that
the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7,
11, 13 and 14 held on o7(e 19�was duly posted for public
inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on a , 192.r
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand thisegv_ day of
1 s 9,T
Penny Kyl eriV ) ry of each of the
Boards of recto rectyb of County Sanitation
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14
of Orange County, California
BWF m,F2]A