Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994-12-14 ,M\Mi10N NLm• 4I .� �•,: °.°� COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS a ' s OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127,FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 10844 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 °NONCE COUP (714)962-2411 December 8, 1994 NOTICE OF MEETING JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA WEDNESDAY DECEMBER 14, 1994 - 7:30 P.M. DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 The Regular Meeting of the Joint Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, will be held at the above location, time and date. Board Secr t Tentatively-Scheduled Uocomina Meetings: OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE - Wednesday, January 4, 1995, at 5:30 p.m. PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE - Thursday, January 5, 1995, at 5:30 p.m. COUNTY SANITATION DIsmas 1 of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 10844 EWS AVENUE 00.BOX 8127 iWMAM VALEY.CAUXORMA 927261 I 01,09623an �/ JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES Joint Board Meetinas Executive Committee Meetings December Dec 14. 1994 None Scheduled January Jan 11, 1995 Jan 25, 1995 February Feb 08, 1995 Feb 22, 1995 March Mar 08, 1995 Mar 22, 1995 April Apr 12, 1995 Apr 26, 1995 May May 10, 1995 May 24, 1995 June Jun 14, 1995 Jun 28, 1995 July Jul 12, 1995 Jul 26, 1995 August Aug 09, 1995 None Scheduled September Sep 13, 1995 Sep 27, 1995 October Oct 11, 1995 Oct 25, 1995 November Nov 08, 1995 None Scheduled December Dec 13, 1995 None Scheduled AGENDA JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 REGULAR MEETING DECEMBER 14, 1994-7:30 P.M. In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the Districts'Administrative Offices not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to i each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Boards i for discussion and/or action, it will be done in with Section 54954.2(b) as an emergency item or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the i attention of the Districts subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a \`J supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. i . ... . .._. ...... __ _ ___ _ (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll call (3) Appointment of Chair pro tem, if necessary (4) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders) (5) Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Boards on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot have action taken by the Boards of Directors except as authorized by Section 54954.2(b). 12/14/94 (6) The Joint Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. (a) Report of Joint Chair, consideration of Resolutions or commendations, presentations and awards (b) Report of General Manager (c) Report of General Counsel (7) EACH DISTRICT ACTION: If no corrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair. District 1 - November 9, 1994 regular District 2 - November 9, 1994 regular District 3 - November 9, 1994 regular District 5 - November 9, 1994 regular District 6 - November 9, 1994 regular District 7 - November 9, 1994 regular District 11 - November 9, 1994 regular District 13 - November 9, 1994 regular District 14 - November 9, 1994 regular (8) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vole differently for any District.) 11/02/94 11/16/94 11/30/94 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $ 976,192.87 $ 575,314.85 $ 1,005,690.78 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 1,607,155.50 267,761.74 2,204,328.59 Joint Working Capital Fund - 184,933.95 142,532.48 171,058.12 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 15,140.56 2,083.33 19,912.25 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 1,415.00 0.00 5,191.38 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 340,002.40 231,024.15 21,315.26 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 85,109.12 23,683.19 160,485.08 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 33,883.66 4,185.68 5,689.24 DISTRICT NO, 6 - 0.00 53.88 278.63 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 16,086.17 1,910.88 16,023.78 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 14,929.35 1,909.27 15,984.66 DISTRICT NO. 13 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 14 - 7,744.21 711,764.85 17,713.55 DISTRICTS NOS. 3 & 11 JOINT - 0.00 2,500.00 0.00 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 2,455.20 2,455.07 0.00 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 &7 JOINT - 2,664.51 0.00 0.00 DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 4,734.84 691.17 14_59 112%447.34 $1 967 870 54 3.643.695.91 -2- 4 12/14/94 u (9) CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEMS 9(a) THROUGH 9(k) I;All matters placed on the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested tote removed from the .J' consent calendar by Director,:staff member or member of the public in attendance, there (. will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by action approving all motions,and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. i 'Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be i removed from the consent calendar. The Chair:will determine if any items are to be deleted from the'consent calendar, Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of Resolution No. 94-145, approving Amendment No. 1 to the Specific `�►' Term Employment Agreement with John B. Falkenstein, PE for specialized engineering and construction management services required for various master-planned construction projects, on an as-needed basis, increasing the hourly rate from $42.50 to the hourly rate of$45.00, for a one-year period beginning January 1, 1995. (b) Consideration of motion to receive and file Summons and Complaint for Wrongful Death and Negligence, Andy C. Patterson; Jackie J. Venezio; Lacey Miller, a minor, by and through her Guardian Ad Lilem, Georgianne I. Miller, Dorothy M. R. Holm and as Executrix of the Estate of Richard L. Holm, vs. City of Huntington Beach, at al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 738179, in connection with construction of Miscellaneous Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-49, and ratifying delegated action of the Executive Committee authorizing employment of Chase, Rotchford, Drukker& Bogust as special counsel to appear and defend the interests of the Districts. (c) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim of Jane Kaye received November 14, 1994, in an unknown amount for alleged damages, and refer to the Districts' General Counsel and liability claims administrator for appropriate action. (d) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny amended claim of Louis Sangernano dated October 16, 1994, in an estimated amount to be more than $500,000.00 for alleged damages, and refer to the Districts' General Counsel, Special Counsel and liability claims administrator for appropriate action. -3- v 12/14/94 (9) DISTRICTS 1 &2 - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (a) Consideration of motion ratifying action of staff in issuing a purchase order to Mladen Buntich Construction Co., Inc. for Emergency Street Repairs to the Memory Lane Interceptor, Contract No. 2-30-R, for a total amount not to exceed $31,457.52; and authorizing staff and General Counsel to seek reimbursement from the City of Santa Ana. DISTRICT 3 (f) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with DGA Consultants, Inc. for permitting, design and construction services for Rehabilitation of Magnolia Trunk Sewer, Orangethorpe Avenue to Ellis Avenue, Contract No. 3-35R, and Seal Beach Boulevard Interceptor Sewer Manhole Rehabilitation, between Westminster Boulevard and 405 Freeway, Contract No. 3-11 R, providing for additional construction services. (g) Consideration of motion to receive and file Summons and Complaint for Personal Injury, Property Damage and Negligence, Nguyen Pham and Khanh Hoang vs. County Sanitation District No. 3, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 738710, in connection with an alleged vehicle accident due to an uncovered manhole, and authorize the District's General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the District. DISTRICTS 5&6 (h) Consideration of the following actions relative to the plans and specifications for Improvements to Bitter Point and Rocky Point Pump Stations, Contract No. 5-32, and Improvements to Bay Bridge Pump Station, Contract No. 5-33: (1) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing a net addition of$2,759.65 to the contract with Uhler, Inc., for four Items of additional or deleted work, and granting a time extension of 293 calendar days for completion of said additional work. (2) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 4 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing a deduction of$6,600.00 from the contract with Uhler, Inc., for adjustment of engineer's quantities. (3) Consideration of Resolution No. 94-153, accepting said project as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement for a final total contract amount of$1,799,421.65 (original awarded contract amount of$1,765,757.00). 4 v 12/14/94 (9) DISTRICT 7- (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (i) Consideration of motion ratifying action of staff in issuing a purchase order to Mladen Buntich Construction Co., Inc. for Emergency Repairs to the Red Hill Interceptor, Contract No. 7.64-R, for a total amount not to exceed $43,482.22. Q) Consideration of motion to receive and file petition from Frank Eckard requesting annexation of.585 acres of territory to the District, in the vicinity of the intersection of Lemon Heights Drive and Foothill Boulevard in unincorporated County territory; and consideration of Resolution No. 94-154-7, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to the District (proposed Annexation No. 143- Eckard Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7). DISTRICT 14 (k) Consideration of motion approving Settlement Agreement with Multek, Inc. relative to administrative penalties for wastewater discharge violations in the total amount of $44,000.00. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (10) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any -5- e 12/14/94 (11) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve staff Summary Financial Report for the three-month period ending September 30, 1994. (12) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Minutes of the Executive Committee (copies enclosed with Directors Executive Committee agenda material). (1) Receive and file draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on November 2, 1994 (2) Receive and file draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on November 3, 1994 (3) Receive and file draft Finance and Personnel Committee Minutes for the meeting held on November 16, 1994 (4) Receive and file draft Executive Subcommittee Minutes for the meeting held on November 29, 1994 (5) Receive and file draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on November 30, 1994 (6) Receive and file draft minutes of the Executive Committee meeting held on November 30, 1994 (b) Consideration of the following actions recommended by said committees: (1) Consideration of the following actions relative to Biofiltration Demonstration Project: (a) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to conduct Phase III Biofltration Demonstration Project, authorizing revised costs and funding as follows: -6- [ITEM (12)(b) CONTINUED ON PAGE 71 12/14/94 (12) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 6) Revised Proposed Phase III Proposed Total Budget Item Phases 18 II Authorization Authorization Staffing $205,000 $42.000 $247,000 Equipment $15,000 $10,000 $25,000 Supplies $18,000 $4,500 $22,500 Travel $7,500 $3,000 $10,500 ConUacls $264,500' $30,500 $295,000 Totals $510,000 $90,000 $600,000 a The revised amount reflects[$15,0001 for analytical services. (b) (1) (b) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to execute an extension to the temporary Specific Term Employment Agreement with Shabbir S. Basrai for engineering services, for an additional ten-month period effective April 10, 1995, for a revised total of 33 and one-half months, increasing the authorized maximum from $89,000.00 to $130.236.00. (c) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to execute agreement with Envirogen, Inc. for Phase III demonstration project services to supply equipment and provide engineering support services, in form approved by the General Counsel, for an amount not to exceed $17,500. (d) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to procure additional services of contract analytical laboratories, or amend existing contracts with analytical laboratories, to conduct necessary testing relative to Phase III Biofiltration Demonstration Project (estimated maximum amount $20,500.00). (a) Consideration of motion approving and authorizing General Manager to execute additional Grant Agreements with the South Coast Air Quality Management District and/or U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, if and when Phase III commitments and grant funding levels have been established and approved by said organizations. ..✓ _7_ [ITEM (12)(b) CONTINUED ON PAGE 8] 12/14/94 .✓ (12) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 7) (b) (2) Consideration of the following actions relative to Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with K P. Lindstrom, Inc. for environmental consulting services to assist staff on NPDES Permit activities; regulatory and legislative liaison activities; and for technical support for sludge management, air quality, reclamation and conservation issues and in connection with CEQA compliance for Master Plan projects, providing for a two-year extension of the agreement: (a) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee certification of the final negotiated fee with K P. Lindstrom, Inc. for said services. (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 94-146, approving Addendum No. 2 to said agreement with K. P. Lindstrom, Inc. for said services, providing for a two-year extension of said agreement, on an hourly-rate basis for labor including overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for an additional amount not to exceed $207,500.00, increasing the total authorized compensation from an amount not to exceed $295,500.00 to an amount not to exceed $503,000.00. (3) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to prepare a scope of work for a Strategic Information Systems Plan, develop a short list of firms with expertise in development of such plans and to submit proposals for a Professional Services Agreement, for consideration by the Boards at a future meeting. (4) Consideration of the following actions relative to Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for design, construction support services and preparation of operation and maintenance manuals for Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38, and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43, providing for additional construction support services: (a) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Planning, Design and Construction Committee certification of the final negotiated fee with John Carollo Engineers for said services. (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 94-147, approving Addendum No. 4 to said agreement with John Carollo Engineers for said additional services, on an hourly rate basis for labor plus overhead, direct expenses and fixed profit for an additional amount not to exceed $246,680.00, increasing the total authorized compensation from $2,519,165.00 to an amount not to exceed $2,762,845.00. 8- [ITEM (12)(b) CONTINUED ON PAGE 9] V 12/14/94 S.� (12) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 8) (b) (5) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 6 to the plans and specifications for Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-2, authorizing an addition of$31,613.00 to the contract with Margate Construction for one item of additional work, increasing the total authorized amount from $14,341,891.00 to an amount not to exceed $14.373,504.00. (6) Consideration of the following actions relative to Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36-2: (a) Consideration of Resolution No. 94-148, approving Reimbursement Agreement with Orange County Water District, providing for reimbursement of costs to the Districts to include construction of a pump station relative to the Green Acres Project in connection with Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36-2. (b) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the report dated September 2, 1994 prepared by John Carollo Engineers for Evaluation of Membrane Diffuser Manufacturers to pre-qualify manufacturers who will bid on supplying air diffusion equipment for Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36-2. (c) Consideration of Resolution No. 94-149, approving plans and v.✓ specifications for Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36-2, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids (tentative bid date is January 10, 1995). (7) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to negotiate Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Black &Veatch for engineering evaluation and design and construction support services required for Chemical and Wastehauler Facility Modifications at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-46, and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-55, providing for additional design services, for consideration by the Boards at a future meeting. (8) Consideration of Resolution No. 94-150, amending Classification and Compensation Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, establishing a conferral of leave policy. (9) Consideration of motion approving request of KPMG Peat Marwick for an increase in the total authorized amount not to exceed $46,800.00 plus out-of-pocket costs to an amount not to exceed $63,861.00 plus out-of-pocket costs for the 1993-94 fiscal year audit. -9- [ITEM (12)(b) CONTINUED ON PAGE 10] 12/14/94 (12) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 9) (b) (10) Consideration of Resolution No. 94-151, amending Classification and Compensation Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, relative to staffing changes in Plant Operations. (11) Consideration of Resolution No. 94-152, commending Charles Egigian Nichols upon his resignation from the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California. (c) Consideration of the following actions recommended by the Planning, Design and Construction Committee: (1) Actions re purchase of DEC 2100-600 AXP Computers: (a) Verbal report of Director of Finance (b) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to AVNET Computer, in the amount of$150,374.00, plus sales tax, for Purchase of Two DEC 2100.600 AXP Computers (Specification No. E-252). (13) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of the following actions relative to Supplement No. 3 to the Program �J Environmental Impact Report for the 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan, re Ocean Ouffall Reliability Upgrades, Job No. J-34-1: (a) Verbal report of Director of Engineering (b) Public Hearing (1) Open hearing (2) Consideration of motion to receive and file written comments received re Supplement No. 3 to said Program Environmental Impact Report (3) Discussion/oral comments, (4) Close public hearing (c) Consideration of motion directing staff to address any written or oral comments received on the Draft Supplement No. 3 to said EIR, after the close of public comment period on December 31, 1994, and to prepare the Final Supplement No. 3 to said EIR for consideration by the Boards. -10- 12/14/94 ..d (14) ALL DISTRICTS --------------------------------------------------------- -----------� CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on '. . :this agenda as aregular meeting of the Boards,the'Chair may convene the I Boards in closed session to consider matters of pending or potential litigation,or personnel matters,pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9,54957 or 54957.6. Reports relating to(a)purchase and sale of real property; (b)matters of r pending or potential litigation:(c)employment actions or negotiations with r' employee representatives;or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act,may be reviewed by the Boards during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such - time as final actions are taken by the Boards on any of these subjects,the 6 minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. 3 --------------------------------- (a) Convene in closed session, if necessary (b) (1) Confer with Districts' representatives concerning status of negotiations with employee group representatives on salaries, benefits and terms of employment. (a) Districts' Representatives: General Manager, General Counsel, Director of Personnel and Director of Finance (b) Confidential Employees (2) Confer with Special Counsel R. Craig Scott&Associates re status of claim of Louis Sangermano (3) Confer with Special Counsel David Griffin re status of litigation, County Sanitation District No. 3 vs. United Technologies Corp. (c) Reconvene in regular session (d) Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session (15) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (16) ALL DISTRICTS Matters which a Director would like staff to report on at a subsequent meeting (17) ALL DISTRICTS Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff report _11_ 12/14/94 (18) DISTRICT 2 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (19) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn (20) DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (21) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn (22) DISTRICT 5 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (23) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn (24) DISTRICT 6 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (25) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn (26) DISTRICT 11 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (27) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn (28) DISTRICT 13 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (29) DISTRICT 13 Consideration of motion to adjourn -12- r 1 2/14/94 (30) DISTRICTS 7 & 14 (a) Receive and file minutes of Districts Nos. 7 and 14 Selection Committee meeting held on December 1, 1994. (b) Consideration of action on the following item recommended by said Committee: (1) Consideration of the following actions relative to Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for design and construction services re Improvements to Main Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7-1, and Abandonment of Nine District No. 7 Pump Stations, Contract No. 7-14, providing for additional design services: (a) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee with Boyle Engineering Corporation for said additional services. (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 94-155-7, approving Addendum No. 1 to said agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for said additional services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, direct expenses and fixed profit, for an additional amount not to exceed $99,420.00, increasing the total authorized compensation from an amount not to exceed $216,168.00 to an amount not to exceed $315,588.00. (31) DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (32) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn (33) DISTRICT 14 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (34) DISTRICT 14 Consideration of motion to adjourn -13- �s/ J 12/14/94 (35) DISTRICT 1 NOTE TO ALL DIRECTORS: In the event that this item is deemed to be of general interest to Directors in other Districts, then a motion requesting that this issue be moved ahead of Agenda Item No. 18 would be appropriate. (a) Public hearing relative to proposed Ordinance No. 124, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 119 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations relative to waiver of connection fees for federally-owned courthouse facilities within the District: (1) Receive and file Staff Report dated November 3, 1994 (2) Receive and file General Counsel's Memorandum dated November 16, 1994 (3) Report of General Counsel (4) Report of Director of Engineering (5) Open hearing (6) Receive and file written comments, if any (7) Oral public comments, if any (8) Close hearing (b) Consideration of the following actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 124, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 119 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations: (1) Consideration of motion to lake no action -OR- (2) Consideration of motion making finding that adoption of said Ordinance is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15273(a) and Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8). (3) Consideration of motion to read said Ordinance No. 124 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). (4) Consideration of motion to introduce said Ordinance No. 124 and pass to second reading on January 11, 1995. E -14- 12/14/94 (36) DISTRICT 1 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (37) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn NOTICE TO DIRECTORS: To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Joint Boards, Directors shall submit items to the Board Secretary not later than the close of business 14 days preceding the Joint Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on the agenda all i items submitted by Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and all formal communications. i Board Secretary: Penny Kyle (714) 962-2411, ext. 2026 Secretary: Petra Tyndall (714) 962-2411, ext. 2029 -15- 91 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1 , 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 , 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES JOINT BOARD MEETING NOVEMBER 9, 1994 �\OPp\SZRICTS OF0 yQz e� �o � c z � u a .o9pT�Cr/N�E ENS\PpP�� ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 ROLL CALL a. A regWar meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Banned.Districts Nos. 1,2,3,5.6, 7, 11. 13 and 14 of Oan6e County, Califomia, Was held on November 9, 1994. an 7:30 p.m.,M the 1 Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation ft roll was raged and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2.3. 5, S.7, 11, 13 and 14 as follows: AUDAE ALTEIINATE DIRECTORS DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO. 1: Fred Be..,Clair Gene Bayer James M.Ferrymen.Clair pro unt Nate Reade x Per McGuigan Thames E. LUD Roger Stamon William G. Steiner Tracy A.Worley Thomas R.Saharelli DISTRICT NO.2: Jahn Collins, Clair George Scott L Iry Rcklen Chair or.mm Tom Daly * Fred Barren Gera Beyer _ China Norby Barry Denes Bob Ball Norman Z.Eckemode Michael Maene maler • William D.Malarm, James H.Flan • Caney J.Nelson Glenn Parker _ Miguel PWido Thomas E. Lea Roger Suntan Wigam G.Stakar L Daniel T.Welch John M.Gellman •_ Game L.Zuket Sheldon Singer DISTRICT NO.3: x Sal A. gainer,Chair William C. Estrada Burnie Dum m. Chair pro ter Caney J.Nelson George Brown Frank lesalo a Chris Norby John Collins George Soon L James H.Fora William D. Mahoney x port R.Griffin Donald Bone Wally Um Eva G.Miner L Thereat E.Lear Pat McGuigan i finds Moulun Ratteran arm Robiaille x Richard Partin Joyce C.Nuhalan In Nw. Tom Daly "aa,"/ i Margie L.Rice James V.Evan L Sheldon Singer George L Val ay, L Roger Suntan William G.Steiner L Chad.Strum Antham Selraggi DISTRICT NO.6: y Jan Debay,Chair Phil Sansone L Wiliam G.Sunni Chair pro tam _ Roger Stanton i John C.Cos.Jr. _ Jan Data, DISTRICT NO.6: �� James A.Warsaw, Chak _ Arthur Perry Evelyn Han,Clair am tom John C.Co.,Jr. Wlliam G.Stamm Roper Stanton DISTRICT NO.7: Barr Hammond,Chair Mike Ward Thomas R.Stimuli,CMir pro hem Jim Potts i Free Barren Gene Beyer Ted Moreno Miguel Pulido a_ Mi Smaxam Jan Demy i William G.Sumer Roger Stanton ,x James A.Waller Mike Schaefer DISTRICT NO. 11: . Grace Wnchell, Chair Fade R ebiuille 1 Victor Leipng.Chair pea tam Linda MWgonPattersm Roger Stanton William G.Steiner DISTRICT NO. 13: John M.Gullumon, Choir x Dumel T.Wdcin Glenn Parker,Chair mo tem Bumie DunaD i Fred gainers Gene Beyer ter_ Iry Nckar Tom Daly x Wiliam G.Steiner Roger Samon DISTRICT NO. 14: Fear A.Swan.Chair Darryl Miller Barry Hammond, Chair pro tem Mike Ward `uxxx� y Fred Barren Gene Beyer Jim Pons Tracy A.War" William G.Stain[ Roper Stanton -2- 11/09194 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Blake P. Anderson, General Manager, Penny Kyle, Assistant Board Secretary, Corinne Berenson, Catherine Biele, Laurie Bluestein, Mike Broyles, Don Crapnell, John Finias, Gary Hasenstab, Irwin Haydock, Ed Hodges, John Linder, Mike Moore, Margie Nellor, Bob Oolen, Ellen Ray, Gary Streed, Petra Tyndall, Mike White, Chuck Winsor, Paula Zeller OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, William N. Clark, Jamel Demir, John B. Howe, Bill Knopf, Mary Lee, Fred J. Meier, Phil Stone, Paul Taylor DISTRICT 13 In the absence of Chair John Gullixson and Chair Appointment of Chair Pro tem pro tem Glenn Parker, Director Fred Barrere was appointed Chair pro tem of District No. 13. ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chair announced that General Manager Adoption of resolution of appreciation for J. Wayne Sylvester was retiring from the Districts. retiring General Manager He then introduced a resolution expressing the J. Wayne Sylvester Boards' appreciation to General Manager J. Wayne Sylvester. It was then moved, seconded and carried by unanimous acclamation: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 94-134, expressing appreciation to retiring General Manager J. Wayne Sylvester for his outstanding contributions and dedication to public service. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chair announced that ten of the Board Adoption of resolutions of appreciation members were retiring from the Board. He then for retiring Directors introduced resolutions expressing the Boards' appreciation to these Directors. It was then moved, seconded and carried by unanimous acclamation: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt the following resolutions expressing appreciation to the retiring Directors for their outstanding contributions and dedication to public service: -3- 11/09/94 Resolution No. Director City/Agency District 94-135 A.B. "Buck"Catlin Fullerton 2 & 3 94-136 Iry Pickier Anaheim 2, 3 & 13 94-137 Carrey J. Nelson Brea 2 94-138 Richard Partin Cypress 3 94-139 Linda Moulton-Patterson Huntington Beach 3 94-140 Grace Wrichell Huntington Beach 11 94-141 William D. Mahoney La Habra 2 94-142 Evelyn Hart Newport Beach 6 94-143 Phil Sansone Newport Beach 7 94-144 James A. Wahner Costa Mesa 6 & 7 Sanitary District Said resolutions, by reference hereto, are hereby made a part of these minutes. Joint Chair Cox stated that the resolutions would be formally presented to each of these Directors at a later date. ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chair reported that the American Society Presentation by American Society of Civil of Civil Engineers (ASCE) had been working with Engineers re Recognition of Districts as an the Districts' public information office for Historic Civil Engineering Project approximately two years assembling a history report and pictures of the Districts in order to designate the Districts as an historical civil engineering project. Joint Chair Cox then introduced Fred Meier, Chairman of the Orange County Branch of the History and Heritage Committee. Mr. Meier summarized ASCE requirements in order to be designated an historical project and reviewed the Districts' history. He then introduced John B. Howe, who assisted in assembling the history report . Mr. Howe gave a brief report on the Districts' history, and mentioned that the Districts originally began in 1912 when the City of Santa Ana entered into an agreement with the Holly Sugar Company to design and build an outfall sewer into the ocean for disposal. Paul Taylor, President of the Los Angeles branch of ASCE, was also recognized. He stated there were five reasons for the awarding of civil engineering landmark status to the facilities and systems of the Districts: 800+miles of system which began over 80 years ago; timely construction and organization of the Districts; Districts and technical personnel meeting serious operations and maintenance challenges in a way of which engineers can be proud; intensive, unique study design and difficult construction of the ocean outfall in 1971; and processing of 230+ million gallons per day throughout the system. A bronze plaque was then presented to the Districts declaring the Districts as an Orange County Historic Civil Engineering Landmark by the American Society of Civil Engineers. -4- 11/09/94 a ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chair announced the tentatively Reoort of the Joint Chair scheduled upcoming meetings as follows: Finance and Personnel Committee-Wednesday, November 16th, at 5:30 p.m. Executive Subcommittee-Tuesday, November 29th, at 5:30 P.M. Steering Committee - Wednesday, November 30th, at 4:30 p.m. Executive Committee -Wednesday, November 30th, at 5:30 p.m. District 7 Selection Committee-Thursday, December 1 st, at 5:00 p.m. Planning, Design and Construction Committee-Thursday, December 1st, at 5:30 p.m. ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager reported that the California Report of the General Manager Energy Commission selected the Districts' treatment facilities as an energy efficient showcase for their Water Energy Efficiency program. The Districts were chosen among 52 applicants because of the DistActs' current achievements and future plans for reducing energy costs, staffs commitment to energy management and willingness to share that experience with others in the industry. The California Energy Commission will be highlighting the Districts' program in articles placed in industrial trade journals. It is expected that industry representatives will be touring Districts' facilities to observe our operating practices. Mr. Anderson further reported that in the near future, the California Energy Commission representatives will assist staff in documenting to further improve our energy savings efforts. In addition, the Districts will become part of a water energy network to facilitate exchanges of information and experiences with other public and private agencies also attempting to manage their use of energy. The General Manager then requested that Margie Nellor, Director of Technical Services, update the Directors relative to the biosolids issue in Thermal, California. Ms. Nellor reported that 75% of the Districts' biosolids were formerly trucked to the site in Thermal in full accordance with all EPA guidelines and without impacting ground water resources as demonstrated by direct testing of the water by EPA. Over the past few weeks the site has not been used because of an ongoing protest conducted by a minority of the members of the Torres-Martinez Tribe, Green Peace and other activists. Ms. Nellor noted that the property owner, the majority of the tribe members and EPA do not oppose the use of the site for composting biosolids. Nevertheless, the government has filed a complaint and is seeking a petition for a temporary restraining order against the owners and operators of the site, but not the generators of the biosolids. Ms. Nellor further reported the complaint alleges that they are nuisances and they will seek awards in relief for the tribe. The temporary restraining order sets forth provisions that allows for the material still on the site that didn't get composted while the protesting was going on to be completed and removed. Ms. Nellor then slated that all of the Districts' biosolids are going to Arizona, and the cost is much higher than the Thermal site because of the transportation distance. Staff is expecting to be able to take the biosolids to Bakersfield in the very near future, thus bringing the costs down. The net result, however, Is that by the end-of-the-year we may experience about $500,000 -5- 11109/94 more in costs than if the biosolids had gone to Thermal for the rest of the year. Staff did budget for the possibility of this type of contingency, so we should remain within budget. Ms. Nellor further reported that other contractors were being looked at and that this matter was discussed at the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting in November. The General Manager then reported that a brochure had been included in the Directors' meeting folders that evening regarding improving the Districts' ability to communicate with the community that we impact during construction projects. This brochure was compiled as a joint effort between the engineering department and public information. DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held October 12, 1994, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or amendments to the Aooroval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held October 12, 1994, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held October 12, 1994, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held October 12, 1994, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meetings held October 12, 1994, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held October 12, 1994, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held October 12 1994, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held October 12, 1994, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -6- 11/09/94 DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held October 12, 1994, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratification of payment of Joint and Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on pages "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. 10/05/94 10/19/94 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $637.371.26 $737,548.19 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 1,670,621.89 157,598.43 Joint Working Capital Fund - 162.603.04 147,479.26 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 53,693.92 60.649.18 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 0.00 7.121.93 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 572,169.86 40,084.94 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 75,646.96 75,522.64 DISTRICT NO. 5 8,332.15 12,653.31 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 0.00 24,859.82 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 5.174.66 14,655.12 DISTRICT NO, 11 16,207.81 172.888.86 DISTRICT NO 13 - 0.00 101.63 DISTRICT NO. 14 - 24,888.79 1,059,665.09 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 7,410.94 1,958.30 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 2,838.39 0.00 DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 4,861.93 691.17 $3 241.621.60 2.51 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving extension of completion date re Collaborative National Study Using That the staff report dated November 2, 1994, be, Molecular Techniques to Detect and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, Hepatitis A Virus and Virulence Factor Genes in E. Coli (Project No. HR-92-061 FURTHER MOVED: That the completion date for with NWRI. UNC and HWRRC the Collaborative National Study Using Molecular Techniques to Detect Hepatitis A Virus and Virulence Factor Genes in E. Coli (Project No. HR-92-06)with National Water Research Institute (NWRI), University of North Carolina (UNC)and Hawaii Water Resources Research Center (HWRRC), be, and is hereby extended, from June 30, 1994 to February 28, 1995, with no change in the grant funding amount of$888,111.00. -7- 11/09/94 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizino settlement of Workers' Compensation claim for former emolovee That the settlement of Workers' Compensation Peony Rupp claim for former employee, Peggy Rupp, in the amount of$22,000.00, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing settlement of Workers' Compensation claim for employee That the settlement of Workers' Compensation John Soto claim for employee, John Soto, in the amount of $20,000.00, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file draft minutes of the Operations Committee That the draft minutes of the Operations Committee meeting held on October 5, 1994, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file draft minutes of the Engineering and Construction Committee That the draft minutes of the Engineering and Construction Committee meeting held on October 6, 1994, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file draft minutes of the Executive Subcommittee That the draft minutes of the Executive Subcommittee meeting held on October 14, 1994, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file draft minutes of the Finance and Personnel Committee That the draft minutes of the Finance and Personnel Committee meeting held on October 19, 1994, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file draft minutes of the Special Executive Search Committee That the draft minutes of the Special Executive Search Committee meeting held on October 26, 1994, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file draft minutes of the Executive Committee That the draft minutes of the Executive Committee meeting held on October 26, 1994, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. -8- 11/09194 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to neaotiate Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to negotiate Agreement with Holmes & Narver. Inc. Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services for design and construction services re Agreement with Holmes & Narver, Inc. for design Job Nos. Pl-44 and 132-53 and construction services required for Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-44, and Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53, providing for additional design and construction support services, for consideration by the Boards at a future meeting. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to negotiate Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to negotiate Agreement with John Carollo Engineers Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services for design. construction support services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for design, and Preparation of operation and construction support services and preparation of maintenance manuals re Job Nos. P1-38 operation and maintenance manuals for and P2.43 Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38, and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43, providing for additional construction support services, for consideration by the Boards at a future meeting. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with That the Engineering and Construction Committee Boyle Engineering Corporation re certification of the final negotiated fee relative to Job No. P1-41 and Job No. P2-48 Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for additional studies, preparation of plans and specifications and construction support services for Rehabilitation of Clarifiers 3, 4 and 5 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-41, and Rehabilitation of Clarifiers D through O at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-48, providing for additional design and software programming services, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 94-131, approving Addendum No. 1 to said agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for said additional services, on an hourly rate basis for labor plus overhead, direct expenses and fixed profit for an additional amount not to exceed $67,198.O0, increasing the total authorized compensation from $482,210.00 to an amount not to exceed $549,408.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -9- 11/09/94 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Aoorovina Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Job That Change Order No. 2 to the plans and Nos. P1-36-1. P1-38-1. P1-38-4 and specifications for Electrification of Pump Drives at P2-43-3 Treatment Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36-1, Security and Landscaping Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-1, Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-4, and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P243-3, authorizing an addition of$26,350.00 to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Inc., Division of Zum Constructors, Inc., for four items of additional work, increasing the total authorized amount from $6,049,864.00 to an amount not to exceed $6,076,214.00, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 4 to the plans and specifications for Job That Change Order No. 4 to the plans and No. P243-1 specifications for Priority Projects Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P243-1, authorizing an addition of$25,000.00 to the contract with Pascal & Ludwig Engineers for one item of additional work, increasing the total authorized amount from $3,303,553.00 to an amount not to exceed $3,328,553.00, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: AApprovina Chance Order No. 5 to the plans and specifications for Job That Change Order No. 5 to the plans and No. 132-42-2 specifications for Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P242-2, authorizing an addition of$22,039.00 to the contract with Margate Construction, Inc. for three items of additional work, increasing the total authorized amount from $14,319,852.00 to an amount not to exceed $14,341,891.00, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Aoorovina Change Order No. 4 to the glans and specifications for Job That Change Order No. 4 to the plans and No. P2-23-5-1 (Rebid No. 2) specifications for Operations Center Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-5-1 (Rebid No. 2), authorizing a net addition of$38,854.00 to the contract with Javaid Contractors, Inc. for three items of additional work, increasing the total authorized amount from $2,321,798.00 to an amount not to exceed $2,360,652.00, and granting a time extension of 19 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and approve Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Prepared by staff That the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report and KPMG Peat Marwick, Certified Public prepared by staff and KPMG Peat Marwick, Accountants Certified Public Accountants, for the year ending June 30, 1994, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. -10- 11/09/94 ALL DISTRICTS Actions re Suoolement No. 3 to the Program Environmental Impact Report for the 1989 Collection. Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan re Job No. J-34-1 Verbal report of staff The Director of Engineering reported that in August the Directors authorized the preparation and circulation of Draft Supplement No. 3 to the Program Environmental Impact Report for the 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan re Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades, Job No. J-34-1. The draft supplement was sent to local, regional and state agencies. Two comments were received and incorporated in Draft Supplement No. 3 dated October 1994. Mr. Linder further stated that any additional comments received through the final date of December 31, 1994 will be incorporated into the final supplement. Receive and file comments received Moved, seconded and duly carried: on the Notice of Preparation of Supplement No. 3 That the comments received on the Notice of Preparation of Supplement No. 3 to the Program Environmental Impact Report for the 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan re Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades, Job No. J-34-1, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. Receive and file Staff Report and Moved, seconded and duly carried: Draft Suoolement No. 3 to EIR That the Staff Report dated October 13, 1994 and Draft Supplement No. 3 to the Program Environmental Impact Report for the 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan re Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades, Job No. J-34-1, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. Authorizing General Manager to file Moved, seconded and duly carried: a Notice of Completion of Draft Suoolement No. 3 to EIR That the General Manger, be, and is hereby, authorized to file a Notice of Completion of Draft Supplement No. 3 to the Program Environmental Impact Report for the 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan re Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades, Job No. J-34-1. Fixino the date, time and place for Moved, seconded and duly carried: Public Hearing re Draft Supplement No. 3 to EIR That the Public Hearing for the Draft Supplement No. 3 to the Program Environmental Impact Report for the 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan re Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades, Job No. J-34-1, be, and is hereby, set for Wednesday, December 14, 1994 at 7:30 p.m., at the Districts' Administrative Office. _11_ 11/09/94 Establishing the final date for That December 31, 1994, be, and is hereby, comments to be received on Draft established as the final dale for which all comments Supplement No. 3 to EIR must be received on Draft Supplement No. 3 to the Program Environmental Impact Report for the 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan re Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades, Job No. J-34-1. ALL DISTRICTS General Counsel reported to the Directors the need General Counsel's Comments Prior to for a closed session as authorized by Government Closed Session Code Section 54956.9, 54957 and 54957.6 to discuss and consider the items that are specified as Item 14(b)(1)(b), (2) and (3) on the published Agenda. General Counsel also indicated a need to add one item needing immediate action that arose subsequent to the publication of the agenda. He reported that additional items could be added pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2(b) upon a two-thirds vote of the Directors. No other items would be discussed or acted upon. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Add Items to the Closed Session Agenda That new pending litigation entitled Andy C. Patterson, at al. vs. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 738179, relating to the fire accident on Job No. P2-49 at Plant No. 2, be added to the Agenda for discussion and action. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Convene in closed session pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9. The Boards convened in closed session at 54957 and 54957.E 8:08 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9, 54957 and 54957.6. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Board(s) of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. A report of actions taken will be publicly reported at the time the approved action becomes final re: Agenda Item 14(b)(3). No actions were taken re: Agenda Items 14(b)(1)(b) and 14(b)(2). ALL DISTRICTS At 8:25 p.m. the Boards reconvened in regular Reconvene in regular session session. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Appointing Penny Kyle as Board Secretary_ re Agenda Item 14(b)(3) That the Boards of Directors hereby appoint Penny Kyle as Board Secretary of the Joint Boards of Directors. -12- 11/09194 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizina Executive Committee to select and retain Special Counsel upon receipt of That the Boards of Directors hereby authorize the Summons and Complaint re Richard Holm, Executive Committee to select and retain Special Lacey Miller, a minor, through her Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the Guardian Ad Litem, Georaianne I. Miller, Districts. Andy C. Patterson and Jackie J. Venezio (Patterson) re Agenda Item 14(b)(4) DISTRICT 1 Actions pertaining to request of the City of Santa Ana for waiver of capital facilities connection charges for Ronald Reagan Federal Building and United States Courthouse Verbal report of staff The Director of Engineering reported that the request of the City of Santa Ana for waiver of capital facilities connection charges for the Ronald Reagan Federal Building and United States Courthouse was brought before the Board of Directors last month. After a brief discussion, it was moved that the request be respectfully denied. It was then noted that the Director representing the City of Santa Ana was not present. A substitute motion was then made to continue the item to the next meeting. Mr. Linder summarized the City of Santa Ana's request to waive the $231,475.00 capital facilities connection charges for the Ronald Reagan Federal Building and United States V Courthouse. He reported that the fees have been adjusted slightly upwards to $245,913.40 based on a new building size estimate of 523,220 square feet. General Counsel then reported that there are no provisions within the Ordinance to waive any fees for federal facilities. A public hearing would need to be conducted for an amendment to the Ordinance to waive the connection fees for federal facilities in general or the federal courthouse, specifically. Following a brief discussion among the Directors, it was then moved, seconded and duty carried: That the request of the City of Santa Ana to waive the $245,913.40 capital facilities connection charges for Ronald Reagan Federal Building and United States Courthouse in Santa Ana, between West Fourth and Fifth Streets and Broadway and Ross Avenues, be, and is hereby, the subject of a public hearing scheduled for December 14, 1994 to consider an amendment to Ordinance No. 119 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations, waiving connection fees for the Ronald Reagan Federal Building and United States Courthouse. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adioumment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:37 p.m. �.../ -13- 11/09/94 DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: d..' Adioumment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:37 p.m. DISTRICT 3 Actions re Professional Services Aoreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation, Contract No. 3-38 Verbal report of staff The Director of Engineering reported that the preparation of a project report, design and construction support services required for Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Contract No. 3-38, is for the replacement of deficient trunk sewers along the Miller-Holder Sewer System. These deficiencies were identified in the 1989 Master Plan. The old pipe ranges in sizes from 15 inches to 27 inches, and the new system would be in the range of 21 inches to 42 inches in diameter, with an estimated construction cost between $8.8 million and $10.4 million. It was further reported that the need to proceed quickly with this design and construction is to stay ahead of street improvements as requested by Cal-Trans and the City of La Habra. Originally, this project was not scheduled for design for a few more years. However, since staff has been informed of the street construction in that area on Beach Boulevard, it is important to speed up this design and construction. Mr. Linder further stated that one of the recommendations is to split the project into three reaches so that the one reach that will be in front of the construction on Beach Boulevard. The first project, which will be Reach 2, is to be completed before the street project begins, which is around the fall of 1995, so staff would like to be under construction in the late spring or early summer of 1995. The Director of Engineering also pointed out that there are three alternatives for the alignment in Reach 1, and staff recommended that Alternate No. 1 along the existing alignment be used primarily due to less maintenance cost on this alignment vs. the other two alignments. Each of these alignments have siphons in them. The two alignments that staff does not recommend have two extra siphons each, which will create extra maintenance work and reduce long-term reliability. It was further reported that the sewer system described is based on a two-pipe system, and if the new pipe is up-sized then the older pipe could be taken out of service, thereby reducing liability and maintenance cost and repairs to manholes which will be required in about five years. The line would not be abandoned, but be only used for reserve or emergencies. Receive and file Project Report Moved, seconded and duly carried: Prepared by Boyle Engineering Coloration That the Project Report prepared by Boyle Engineering Corporation, be, and is hereby, received and ordered fled. -14- 11/09194 Directing Staff and Boyle Moved, seconded and duly carried: Engineering Corporation to proceed with Preparation of the plans and That staff and Boyle Engineering Corporation, be, specifications for Alternative No. 1 and are hereby, directed to proceed with re Contract No. 3-38 preparation of the plans and specifications for Alternative No. 1, dividing Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Contract No. 3-38, into three separate projects, Improvements to Miller-Holder Sewer System, Reach 1 (Rostrata Avenue to 5,800 feet North of Rosecrans Avenue), Contract No. 3-38-1; Improvements to Miller-Holder Sewer System, Reach 2 (5,800 feet North of Rosecrans Avenue to Imperial Highway), Contract No. 3-33-2; and Improvements to Miller-Holder Sewer System, Reach 3 (Beach Boulevard to Harbor Boulevard), Contract No. 3-38-3. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adioumment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:47 p.m. DISTRICTS 5 &6 Actions re Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3. Contract No. 5-37-3 Verbal report of staff The Director of Engineering reported that the plans and specifications for Replacement of Pacific Coast �...✓ Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3, Contract No. 5-37-3, was approved in September. This project is the replacement of a 27-inch and 30-inch day line which was built in 1936. This line is being replaced with a new Gay pipeline which varies in size from 30 inches to 36 inches, and runs along Pacific Coast Highway between the Arches and Bitter Point Pump Station. He further reported that this is the last phase of replacing the line along Pacific Coast Highway. Mr. Linder advised that a reimbursement agreement had been approved with the City of Newport Beach for sewer improvements. He then stated that on October 13, 1994, ten bids were received for this project. The bids ranged from a high of$3,296,866.00 to a low of$1,985,000.00, submitted by Wal-Con Construction Company, and recommended that the contract be awarded to the low bidder. The engineer's estimate was $2.2 million. After a brief discussion, the Directors approved the following two items. Approving Addendum No. 1 to the Moved, seconded and duly carried: plans and specifications That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3, Contract No. 5-37-3, changing the date for receipt of bids from October 11, 1994 to October 13, 1994, and making miscellaneous technical clarifications, be, and is hereby, approved. -15- 11/09/94 Receivina and filing bid tabulation Moved, seconded and duly carried: �• and recommendation and awarding contract to Wal-Con Construction That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Company Resolution No. 94-132, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3, Contract No. 5-37-3, to Wal-Con Construction Company, in the total amount of$1,985,000.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Summons and Cross- Comolaint. 21st Century Casualty That the Summons and Cross-Complaint entitled Company vs. State of California. State of 21 st Century Casualty Company vs. Stale of California vs. County Sanitation District California, State of California vs. County Sanitation No. 5 and Anaheim Sewer Construction, District No. 5 and Anaheim Sewer Construction, Orange County Municipal Court Case Orange County Municipal Court Case No. 94-C-2083 No. 94-C-2083, seeking recovery for alleged property damage, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Districts' General Counsel, be, and is hereby, authorized to seek and defend the interests of the Districts. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:52 p.m. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adioumment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:52 p.m. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordering Annexation No. 139 - Garr Annexation That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 94-133-7, ordering annexation of 1.599 acres of territory to the District, in the vicinity southeast of the intersection of Ranchwood Trail and Amapola Avenue in unincorporated County territory(Annexation No. 139- Garr Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7). Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adioumment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:37 p.m. �.d -16- 11/09/94 DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adioumment � That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:37 p.m. DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adioumment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:37 p.m. DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adioumment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:37 p.m. ecretary of o s of Directors of County S atio istricts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 -17- �. 'NO NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9R9/94 PAGE 01 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID IW05/94 POSTING DATE 10105N4 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 140441 AO TECH COMPANY 561,734 OO RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10.9.91 141A42 AT&T-PROWATTS S4,308AI LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 140443 ATB T-MEGACOM SERVICE $971.46 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 140444 A T&T-CELLULAR OR&R $2.02 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 140445 ABRASIVE ENO.,TOOL&EQUIP $431.82 PAINT SUPPLIES 140446 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS $473.116.05 CONSTRUCTION P1.38-1 140441 AIR CLEANING SPECIALISTS $641.33 ELECTRIC PARTS 140448 AM PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS f17,7".00 O&M AGREEMENT OKY GEN.SYST.M 0.8-9-89 140449 AMELCO CONSTRUCTION $928.09 CONSTRUCTION P2-534 140450 AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $546.46 BUILDING MATERIALS 140451 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL E330.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 140452 APCO VALVE&PRIMER CORP, $1.844.78 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 140453 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $1,374,69 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 140454 ARRONA INSTRUMENT $643,51 INSTRUMENT 149455 ARMOR-VAC E702.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES In 1404% ARROWHEAD ELECTRIC CORP. $164.87 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 140457 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE,INC. E1,128AID WASTE REMOVAL 2 141H59 AWARDS&T VACUUM TECH.,INC, f$34.26 FITTINGS CU 140460 AWARDS&TROPHIES 072.46 PLAGUES 140461 BKK LANDFILL f3,028.61 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.D.169-91 140481 BRW SAFETY&SUPPLY E72&.61 SAFELY SUPPLIES L 140462 BATTERY SPECIALTIES 5639.60 BATTERIES I 140463 BAKTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $4.555.09 LAB SUPPLIES 140 M BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $689.76 TRUCK WASH TICKETS 140465 BELLCO GLASS,INC. $164.41 LAB SUPPLIES 14NN BELL SECURITY f1,882.64 SECURITY SERVICES 14M67 GENTLY NEVADA $349.89 INSTRUMENT PARTS 140468 BEN2 ENGINEERING,INC. E1,144.28 COMPRESSOR PARTS 140469 DAVID BIHL E13,000.00 DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL 140470 BID TECH NET,INC. $6.33 SERVICE AGREEMENT 140471 BLACK&VEATCH $3,652,05 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-25.1 140472 BLOOMBERG L.P. $4.832.59 FINANCIAL MONITORING M.O.4-1493 140473 BORNEMANN PUMPS,INC. $240.27 PUMP PARTS 140474 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $40.433.78 ENGINEERING SERVICES P141 140475 BROOKS INSTRUMENT DIV. $321.56 INSTRUMENT PARTS 140476 BNI BOOKS EIMA9 TECHNICAL BOOKS 140477 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. f194.49 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 140478 BUSH&ASSOCIATES,INC. $7.43600 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.".94 140479 BUY-CHEM DISTRIBUTORS $1.629.61 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 140480 C.L.TECHNOLOGY $720.00 GAS ANALYSIS SERVICES 140401 C.P.I. $969.29 LAB SUPPLIES 140482 CS COMPANY $6,119.12 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 140483 CADVENTURES $989,75 ENGINEERING SERVICES 1404M CALTROL,INC. $395.66 REGULATOR PARTS 140465 CARLETON ENGINEERS S782.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES-AIR QUALITY 14NN JOHN CARDLLO ENGINEERS f80,605.03 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-34 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/29/94 PAGE 02 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10I05AM POSTING DATE 10/05/94 WARRANT NO. AMOUNT 140487 CENTURY SAFETY INST.6 SUPPLY $420.23 SAFETY SUPPLIES 14H88 LORETTA L.COFFMAN $137.92 PUBLICATION 140489 COUCH 8 SONS $561.272.40 CONSTRUCTION 2-9-RI 140490 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA 34,590.05 HARDWARE 140491 COMPUSA,INC. $524A3 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 140492 COMPUSERVE $207.23 .COMPUTER SERVICES 14D493 CONNEL GM PARTS I DIV. $15.51 TRUCK PARTS 140 N CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $65.92 ELECTRIC PARTS 140495 CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS 3147A4 FREIGHT 140498 CONSTRUCTION FABRICATORS,INC. $13,309.28 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 140497 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC. 8254.34 TOOLS 14049E CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO. $2.602.16 CHLORINE M.0.10-11A3 140499 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS O C $2,566.08 CONSULTING SERVICES M.O.8-11.93 140500 CONVEYOR COMPONENTS CO. $3,09835 ELECTRIC PARTS rn 140501 COOPER INDUSTRIES,INC. $89,715.10 ENGINESIENGINE PARTS M.0.64-88 X 140502 COSTAR CORP. $107.75 LAB SUPPLIES = 140503 COUNTERPART ENTERPRISES $1,325,32 COMPRESSOR PARTS pp 140504 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $1.337.72 ELECTRIC PARTS 140505 CURRENT PROTOCOLS $371.00 SUBSCRIPTION 1405M DME,INC. 92,695.51 PLUMBING SUPPLIES y 140W7 D.T.I. $60.00 CHEMICALS 1 140NS J.W.D'ANGELO CO.,INC. 3586.06 BUILDING MATERIALS N 140509 OVALS SALES COMPANY $4.66 FREIGHT 140510 DOUGLAS J.DAVIS 6 ASSOC..INC. 84,074.30 CONSTRUCTION SAFETY ASSESSMENT 14-1-1A 140511 DELL COMPUTER CORP. StS.050.37 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 140512 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIF. $34,742.95 DENTAL INSURANCE PUN 140513 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. S1,708.96 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 140514 DISPOSAL CONTROL SERVICE,INC. $5,372.48 HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSAL M.0.1-13-92 140515 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $718.27 PAINT SUPPLIES 140510 ESP NORTH $304.66 ELECTRIC PARTS 140517 ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLING $103.59 LAB SUPPLIES 140510 EASTMAN,INC. $3.816.43 OFFICE SUPPLIES 140519 ENCHANTER,INC. $4,480.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O. A. W 140520 ENVIRONMENTAL PROD.USA $2.067.72 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 140521 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $750.50 LAB SERVICES 140522 FLUID TECH.SALES $1,103.41 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 140523 MARSHALL FAIRRES $78.06 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 140524 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $1,620.00 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O. 10-9-91 140525 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $96.50 AIR FREIGHT 140520 FIRST CHOICE $368.00 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 140527 FISCHER 6 PORTER CO. 81,116.16 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 140528 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. 3348.19 LAB SUPPLIES t40529 FLO-SYSTEMS $222.62 PUMP PARTS 140530 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $156.27 PHOTO SUPPLIES 140531 CRY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $25.294.56 WATER USE 140532 THE FOXBORO CO. $1,516.10 ELECTRIC PARTS !` C .NONO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9129/94 PAGE03 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10IOS194 POSTING DATE 10MS194 WARRANT NO. AMOUNT 140533 CITY OF FULLERTON 5357.01 WATER USE 140534 FURON DEKORON $1,791.31 INSTRUMENT PARTS 140535 GST,INC. S82.93 OFFICE SUPPLIES 140536 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $2,421.99 LUMBERMARDWARE I40537 GEAR TECH $800.00 MECHANICAL INSPECTION 140538 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $175.17 ELECTRIC PARTS 140539 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $119.19 TELEPHONE SERVICES 140540 GENICOM CORPORATION 5507.29 PRINTING SUPPLIES 140W GIERLICH-MITCHELL,INC. $8.027.99 MECHANICAL PARTS 140512 WIN GRAINGER.INC. $61.05 COMPRESSOR PARTS 140M3 GRASSY S.T I. $3,826,00 ENGINE PARTS 1405" DGA CONSULTANTS $5.270,00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.8-8.94 140545 DONGREEK&ASSOC. 529,147.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 336R 140546 DAVID R.GRIFFIN 517,61685 LEGAL SERVICES-TECHITE PIPE N0547 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $165,84 TRUCK PARTS m 140548 HACH COMPANY $500.94 OPERATION SUPPLIES x 140549 GEORGE T.HALL CO. S450.97 ELECTRIC PARTS 2 140551 HARBOURENOINEERING $5.011.50 PUMP DEFEMPARTS DC w 100551 FREDA HARPER $I,500.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 140552 SIM J.HARRIS CO. $987.M TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT n 140553 HATCH 8 KIRK.INC. $1.613.92 ENGINE PARTS 1405M PL HAM CO,INC. $/39A3 FILTERS W 140555 HEWLETT PACKARD $1.470.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 1405M HI STANDARDAUTOMOTIVE $1.324.78 TRUCK PARTS 14D557 HOERBIGER CVS CALIF.,INC. $436.69 COMPRESSOR PARTS 140558 HOKE CONTROLS DIV IHOKE,INC. SIM.01 VALVES 140559 MARGARET M.HOLM $5,000.00 LIABILITY SETTLEMENT 140560 HOLMES B NARVER,INC. S64,633.42 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-M 140561 HOME DEPOT $M3.78 SMALL HARDWARE 14M62 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $317.07 PAINT SUPPLIES 140563 ORANGE COUNTY FED CREDIT UNION SBB0.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 1411564 IC MEYERS PROPERTIES $75.00 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 14005 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $80,941.72 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.11.18-92 140NS INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS 5965.22 CONNECTORS 140W7 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. $26121 TRUCK PARTS 140568 INORGANIC VENTURES SMILM LAB SUPPLIES f40569 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS S561.97 BATTERIES 140570 INVNROGEN $105.60 LAB SUPPLIES 140571 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $5.54 WATER USE 140572 J2 PRINTING SERVICES $1.060.80 PRINTING 140573 JAMISON ENGINEERING 713,652.95 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 140574 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY. $321.12 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 140575 JAYS CATERING $170.35 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE 140578 JERSEY LAB SUPPLY $115.00 LAB SUPPLIES 140577 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $166.87 ELECTRIC PARTS 140578 JONES INDUSTRIAL HARDWARE CO. $162.24 TOOLS FUNONO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9QM4 PAGE04 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10/0S/94 POSTING DATE 10/05AJ4 WARRANT NO. AMOUNT 140579 KAMAN BEARINGS 8 SUPPLY $133.35 MACHINE SUPPLIES 140580 KENNEDY HYDRAULICS $273.33 MOTOR REPAIRS 140581 KIMMELWOTZ REFRIGERATION $433.93 MACHINE REPAIRS 140502 KING BEARING,INC. $57.50 MACHINE SUPPLIES 140583 KIRST PUMP 6 MACHINE WORKS $1.218.04 PUMP PARTS 1405" KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $1.736.09 TOOLS 140585 LCD POWER SYSTEMS $1.100.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 1405M L A CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. 3988.37 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES 140587 LA LIQUID HANDLING SYSTEMS $1,570.74 PUMP PARTS 140586 LAKEWOOD INSTRUMENTS 3203.09 INSTRUMENT PARTS 140589 IAWICRANDALL,INC. 31,695.00 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.743-94 140590 LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT L.LAVOIE $534.52 LEGAL SERVICES-NITZEN 140591 LEE 6 NO CONSULTING ENGR. $67,572.98 ENGINEERING SERVICES P140.1 140592 LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INS.CO. $5,7u.30 DEFERRED COMP TRUSTEE TRANSFER m 140593 LOCALAGENCY 3500.00 LAFCO FEES x 1405" MSC APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL $970.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.&10.92 m 140595 MACOMCO 3577.20 SERVICEAGREEMENT w 140595 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $571,156.00 CONSTRUCTION P242-2 140597 MARKON COMPUTER SCIENCE $197.W OFFICE MACHINE -� 14059S MARVAC ELECTRONICS $197.65 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES n 140599 MATT-CMLOR.INC. $2,154.98 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 140600 MCKENNA ENGR.B EQUIP. 33,790A9 PUMP PARTS t 140601 MCWELCO RACK-N-BOX CO. $2,064.60 TOOLBOXES 140602 MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. $2.657.53 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 140603 MIDWAY MFG.S MACHINING $770.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 140604 MILLTRONICS $045.05 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 140605 MISCO $2,54349 OFFICE FURNITURE 1406M MISSION INDUSTRIES $4,033.33 UNIFORM RENTALS 140607 MONITOR PUBLISHING CO. $1.455.40 SUBSCRIPTION 140605 MONTGOMERY WATSON S".134.29 AIR TOXICS PROJECT M.0.12.12-N 140609 MURPHY INDUSTRIAL COATINGS 34,7W.W PAINT REMOVAL 140610 NASCO WEST,INC. 3300AI LAB SUPPLIES 140611 NATIONAL BUSINESS WOMENS $69.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 140812 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $370.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES 140613 NEAT SUPPLY CO. $54.75 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 140614 NEUTRON 37AI8.54 CHEMICALS 140615 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $519 WATER USE 140616 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $367.70 SAFETY GLASSES 140617 OMEGA ENGINEERING,INC. SINAI EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 14MIS ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. $139.25 TRUCK PARTS 140619 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL $2,346.65 CHEMICALS 140620 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $3,182.68 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 140621 ORANGE COURIER $133.65 COURIER SERVICES 140622 ORION PRINTING 6 DESIGN $1.153.29 PRINTING AW23 ORANGE OVERHEAD DOOR COMPANY $621.00 BUILDING REPAIRS 140624 OXYGEN SERVICE 3415.83 SPECIALTY GASES �rUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9Q9M PAGE 05 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAUS PAID 1005194 POSTING DATE 10/05194 WARRANT NO. AMOUNT 140625 ORANGE COUNTY HEALTH CARE AGCY $1.020.00 SLUDGE SPILL REPORT 140626 PGC SCIENTIFICS CORPORATION $402.50 LAB SUPPLIES 14W27 PSSI $3,568.50 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION 140628 PACIFIC PARTS $3.179.03 INSTRUMENT PARTS 140629 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. $1.516.02 SAFETY SUPPLIES 140630 PACIFIC BELL $151.59 TELEPHONE SERVICES 140631 PACIFIC WALK-IN MEDICAL $130.00 MEDICAL SERVICES 14MM PACIFIC WATER CONDITIONING CO. $280.00 EQUIPMENT RENTALS 140633 PAGENET $1,175.84 PAGER RENTALS 14DS34 PALMIERI,TYLER,WIENER, $42.00 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.6.12-91 140635 PARAGON CABLE $36.78 CABLE SERVICES 140636 PARTS UNLIMITED $787.37 TRUCK PARTS 140637 PASCAL B LUDWIG $122,031.36 CONSTRUCTION PI-38-2 140638 PASCAL AND LUDWIG 554,992.10 CONSTRUCTION P2A3-1 TIT 140639 PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION $720.75 LAB SUPPLIES 2 140640 PERMA SEAL 51,091.77 LUSE OIL 140641 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $149.07.25 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.5-8-91 0U 1406/2 POLYMETRICS,INC. $1.252.75 LAB SUPPLIES -1 140643 POLYPURE,INC. $24,596.08 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-92 140644 POSTAGE BY PHONE S5,0D0.00 POSTAGE 3. 14MS PREMIER STEEL $1,353.74 METAL 140646 PUBLIC FINANCIAL MGMT.,INC. 56,827.7T FINANCIAL CONSULTING SERVICES M.O.6.8-94 140847 QUESTRON CORP. SINA0 LAB REPAIRS 140646 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $160.55 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS 14DB49 DR.SHIVAJI RAMALINGAM $324.50 LAB SUPPLIES 140850 RED WING SHOES $229.30 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 140651 ROYCE INSTRUMENT $621.99 INSTRUMENT PARTS 140652 RYAN-NERCO $640.90 PUMP PARTS 140653 SAN DIEGO SAFETY COUNCIL $17,123.04 TRAINING REGISTRATION 140654 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $3.485.79 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 140655 R.CRAIG SCOTT B ASSOC. $23.709.45 LEGAL SERVICES-PERSONNEL ISSUES 140656 SCOTT SPECIALTY OASES,INC. $1,577.78 SPECIALTY GASES 140857 SHURELUCK SALES $10,794.39 TOOLSIHARDWARE 140658 SIDU MFG CO. 52,044.58 TOOLS 140659 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO. 563.33 TAB SUPPLIES 140660 SIMS WELDING SUPPLY $34.00 BIOFILTRATION PART 140661 SKALAR,INC. $188.41 LAB REPAIRS 14%62 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $35.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL E)(AMS 140653 SMITH PIPE 8 SUPPLY $391.42 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 140884 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. $96,286.82 POWER 14N6S SO.CAL.GAS.00. $2,11N.60 NATURAL GAS 140666 SOUTHLAND SHADE $148.48 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 140667 SPARLING INSTRUMENT CO.,INC. $6,198.30 METER 14068E WESTALLOY,INC. $998.17 WELDING SUPPLIES 140669 SPEK INDUSTRIES,INC. $815.61 LAB SUPPLIES 140670 SPIRE TECHNOLOGIES SYS.DIV. $3,529.00 OFFICE EQUIPMENT FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9MIM PAGE 06 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10105M POSTING DATE 1OAISM WARRANT NO. AMOUNT 140671 STEVENS WATER MONITORING SYS. $919,01 SCALE REPAIRS 140672 STRATAGENE $348.87 LAB SUPPLIES 140673 GARY G.STREED $2,731.39 REIMS.PETTY CASH,TRAINING A TRAVEL 140874 SUNSETFORD S58.10 TRUCK PARTS 140675 TCH ASSOCIATES S464.80 LAB SUPPLIES 140676 TRW SPACE 8 ELECTRONICS GROUP $1.510.00 LAB SUPPLIES 140677 TALENT TREE PERSONNEL SERVICES $1,853.15 TEMPORARY PERSONNEL 140678 TEKTRONIX,INC. $896.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 140879 THOMAS FISH COMPANY $107.25 LAB SUPPLIES 140680 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $1,006.79 MECHANICAL PARTS 140681 THORPE INSULATION $156.47 PIPE 140682 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES S3,828.80 TRAVEL SERVICES M.06/8194 140883 TREBOR ELECTRONICS $247.35 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 140684 TRUCK 8 AUTO SUPPLY.INC. $423.32 TRUCK PARTS Rl 1408e5 TRUESDAIL LABS $996.94 LAB SERVICES X 140686 JG TUCKER B SON.INC. $2,998.85 INSTRUMENT PARTS 2 140687 TUSTIN DODGE $12.22 TRUCK PARTS 1406B8 TWINING LABORATORIES $16,429.72 SOIL TESTING M.O]43.94 o 140689 U.S.AUTO GLASS CENTERS $118.96 TRUCK PARTS --1 140690 UNISOURCE WOR BUTLER PAPER $1.052.82 OFFICE SUPPLIES 140691 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE S305.14 PARCEL SERVICES nj 140892 US GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE S49M00 SUBSCRIPTION m 140693 VWR SCIENTIFIC S237.39 LAB SUPPLIES 140894 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $3,168.04 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 140895 VILLAGE NURSERIES $125.58 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 140696 VULCAN PEROXIDATION SYSTEMS $49,609.14 CHEMICALS M.O.3.9.94 140697 WATERS CORPORATION $7.45017 SERVICEAGREEMENT f40698 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY S29.757.99 CAUSTIC SODA B HYPOCHLORIDE M.0.8-12-9264-11W 140899 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $46083 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 140700 JOHN WILEY 6 SONS.INC. $238.13 PUBLICATION 140701 WIRTH GAS EQUIPMENT $204.20 ENGINE PARTS 140702 WITEG S127.15 LAB SUPPLIES 140703 ROURKE,WOODRUFF B SPRADLIN S50.729.37 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.2-M92 140704 XEROX CORP. $597.27 COPIER LEASES 140705 JOHNSON YOKOGAWA CORP. $870.02 CHARTS 140706 RICHARD B.EDGAR $200.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION TOTAL CLAIMS PAID I=5W4 60.241,82L80 A NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9129194 PAGE 07 c , REPORT NUMBER M43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 1010SM4 POSTING DATE 10/U5M SUMMARY AMOUNT 02 OPER FUND 64,413.63 02 CAP FAC FUND 567,756.23 03 OPER FUND 58,030.11 03 CAP FAC FUND 17,616.05 05 OPER FUND 8.318.15 05 CAP FAC FUND 14.00 OT OPER FUND 5.174.66 011 OPEN FUND 15.756.81 O11 CAP FAC FUND 452.00 414 OPER FUND 416.00 014 CAP FAC FUND 24.472.79 0596 OPEN FUND 2.491.20 0586 CAP FAC FUND 4.919.74 m 068T OPER FUND 2,836.39 X 07814 OPER FUND 4.881.93 2 JT OPER FUND 6 . 126 w CORF 1,87070,62821.89 —1 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND 53,693.92 n JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL 162,603.04 I 53,241,821.80 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1W12M PAGE 01 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 1071M94 POSTING DATE 1011901 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 140738 AG TECH COMPANY 660,457.14 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.OA 0.9-91 140737 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS.INC. $39,829.09 CONSTRUCTION PI-3&1 140738 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $18,475.70 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.O.8-9419 140739 AMELCO CONSTRUCTION $142,557.50 CONSTRUCTION P2-50./ 140740 AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $619.73 GROUNDSKEEPING SUPPLIES 140741 AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR MICROBIOLOGY 8497J10 PUBLICATION 140742 AMERSCO,INC. $193.05 LAB SUPPLIES 140743 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION $1,619.10 SEWER REPAIRS 140744 ANIXTER-DISTRIBUTION $1.963.38 OFFICE FURNITURE 140745 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $5119.92 NOTICES B ADS 140746 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. $35.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL 140747 ATKIWJONES COMPUTER SERVICE $321.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT 140748 AUDIO VIDEO REPORTING SERVICE 596.59 PUBLICATION 140749 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $3.008.14 PAYROLL SERVICES m 140750 BKK LANDFILL 54.986.6E RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.110.9.91 X 140751 BANANA BLUEPRINT $2,069.93 PRINTINGM.O.10.10-90 = 140752 BARCLAYS LAW PUBLISHERS $126.00 PUBLICATION to 14070 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $38708 BATTERIES W '-4 140755 BAXTERDIAGNOSTICS,INC. f$950.01 LAB SUPPLIES "i 140755 BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS E950.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT CO 140756 81O VENTURES.INC. $162A0 LAB SUPPLIES 1 f40757 BLACKBVEATCH $1,084.06 ENGINEERING SERVICES P248 F-+ 140758 BLAIR-MARTIN CO..INC. $513.01 VALVES 140759 SOERINGER MANNHEIM $640.49 LAB SUPPLIES 1407M BOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE 5416.51 TRUCK REPAIRS 140761 BONA-RUES $49.05 TRUCK PARTS 140762 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $39.349.99 ENGINEERING SERVICES 6.1380.38 140763 BRENNER-FIEDLER 8 ASSOC..INC. $462.40 LAB SUPPLIES 140764 BUDGET JANITORIAL S67500 JANITORIAL SERVICES 140765 BUY-CHEM DISTRIBUTORS $815.88 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 140766 CEPA 585.00 LAB SUPPLIES 140767 C.L.TECHNOLOGY $720.00 LAB SERVICES 140768 C M 1 $463.69 ELECTRIC PARTS 140769 C.P.O. $1,340.62 LAB SUPPLIES 140770 SRTC94,CWPCA,INC. $410.00 TRAININGREGISTRATION 140771 CAD VENTURES $183.17 ENGINEERING SUPPLIES 140772 CAERE CORP. $147.50 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 140773 CALGLASS FOR RESEARCH,INC. $1.613.94 LAB SUPPLIES 140774 CALIFORNIA AUTO COLLISION,INC. $412.37 TRUCK PARTS 140775 CALIF.ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS $1,316.6t MECHANICAL PARTS 140776 CALSCIENCE ENVIRONMENTAL LABS $560.00 LAB SERVICES 140777 CAPITAL WESTWARD $175.54 MECHANICAL PARTS 140778 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $71,935.64 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI.38 140779 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $547.66 OFFICE FURNITURE 14076o CENTURY PAINT 5210.70 PAINT SUPPLIES 140781 CENTURY SAFETY INST.B SUPPLY $1.379.75 SAFETY SUPPLIES {( c \ . JND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE INIM4 PAGE 02 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10N9194 POSTING DATE 10'19AKI WARRANT NO. AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 140792 COAST RUBBER STAMP $60.34 OFFICE SUPPLIES 140763 COUCH 8 SONS $165.875.69 CONSTRUCTION 11-17-1 140784 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA S499.96 PUMP PARTS 140705 COMPUSERVE $239.68 COMPUTER SERVICES 140785 CONNEL GM PARTS IDIV. $57.78 TRUCK PARTS 140787 CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS $162,09 FREIGHT 140788 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC. $4.025.81 TOOLS 140789 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO. $4,832S9 CHLORINE M.0.10AI-93 140M CONTINENTAL LAB PRODUCTS $1,31200 LAB SUPPLIES 140791 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS O C $2.362.14 CONSULTING SERVICES M.O.041-93 140792 COOPER INDUSTRIES,INC. $20.337.91 ENGINE PARTS 140793 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $446.65 TRUCK PARTS 1407M COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $26.94 ELECTRIC PARTS 140795 STATE BOARD OF EOUALIZATION $189.90 UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE FEE Tn 140796 DIME.INC. $2,075.27 PLUMBING SUPPLIES X 140797 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE $204.79 TRUCK PARTS 2 140798 DE GUELLE B SONS GLASS CO. 1391.56 BUILDING REPAIRS 140799 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIF. $41.287.37 DENTAL INSURANCE PUN td 1408M DIALOG INFORMATION SERVICES $75.00 COMPUTER SOFTWARE —1 140801 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $NO.00 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE to 140802 OMER INSTRUMENT,INC. $123.24 INSTRUMENT I 140803 D'VALS SALES $2.673.81 FITTINGS N 140804 EGA(ENGINEERING DESIGN AUTO) S99S00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 140805 E J L 8 ASSOC. $2,337.06 LAB SERVICES 1408M EASTMAN,INC. $7,858.49 OFFICE SUPPLIES 140807 EBERHARD EQUIPMENT $890.90 TRUCK PARTS 140808 ECOANALYSIS,INC. $2.527.00 CONSULTING SERVICES 140809 ELSEVIER SCIENCE PUBLISHING $452.00 SUBSCRIPTION 140810 ENCHANTER,INC. S3,920.00 OCEAN MONITORING M 0.6.10.92 140811 ESSCO PUMPS AND CONTROLS $693.78 PUMP PARTS 140812 ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLING SUPPLY $91.10 US SUPPLIES 140813 EXCELLENCE IN TRAINING $20.00 TRAINING SUPPLIES 140814 EXCHANGER WORKS B FABRICATION $450.00 COMPRESSOR PARTS 140815 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $10.096.17 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0. 10.9.91 140816 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $42.75 AIR FREIGHT 14017 FISCHER B PORTER CO. $3.99 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 140618 FISHER SCIEN7IFIC CO. $764.11 LAB SUPPLIES 14UB19 FISIONS INSTRUMENTS $700.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 140820 FL"YSTEMS $3,101.42 PUMP PARTS 140021 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $71.83 PHOTO SUPPLIES 140822 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $525.00 FIRE PERMIT 140823 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $4,244.97 PAINT SUPPLIES 140824 FREDSON RV SUPPLY $457.85 TRUCK PARTS 140825 GST,INC. $872,20 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 140826 GENERAL BINDING CORP. $27.85 PRINTING 140827 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $324,27 ELECTRIC PARTS FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE lWI2194 PAGE03 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID IOH9194 POSTING DATE 10/19/94 WARRANT NO. AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 140828 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1,705.78 TELEPHONE SERVICES 140829 GERHARDTS,INC. $906.75 INSTRUMENT PARTS 140830 GIERLICH-MITCHELL,INC. $8,571.86 PUMP PARTS 140031 N GLANTZ S SON $565.69 BUILDING MATERIALS 140832 GOLDEN COAST SAWDUST PROD. 51,616.26 SAWDUST 140833 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $265.07 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 140834 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $650.59 PRIMING 140836 DGA CONSULTANTS $16.133.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.06-6-N 140836 GROTH EQUIPMENT CORP. $78.23 FREIGHT 140837 HB TYPE S GRAPHICS $473.54 PRINTING 140838 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $134.79 TRUCK PARTS 140839 GEORGE T.HALL CO. $536.65 ELECTRIC PARTS 140040 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC SWAT PLUMBING SUPPLIES 140841 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS $1.650.00 CONTAINER RENTALS m 140842 HAUSER ENGINEERING $1.188.60 LAB SERVICES X 140843 14AWKINS ASSOCIATES $1.450.00 LAB EQUIPMENT 2 140044 PL HAWN CO,INC. $1.495.00 FILTERS W 140845 JOHN C.HENSERGER CO. $1.001.69 INSTRUMENT PARTS rl 140846 HILTI,INC. $290.45 ELECTRIC PARTS --f 14OB47 HOERBIGER CVS CALIF.,INC. $55.04 COMPRESSOR PARTS 140848 HOKE CONTROLS DIV/HOKE,INC. $97.45 VALVES �I 140849 HOME DEPOT 81,0/2.94 HARDWARE W 140850 IRS HUGHES CO,INC. $398.52 PAINT SUPPLIES 140651 HUNTINGTON VALLEY SCHWINN $212.04 BICYCLE PARTS 140852 IDEXX $407.99 LAB SUPPLIES 140853 IMAGING PLUS $331.25 OFFICE SUPPLIES 140854 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $36.357.83 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11C&92 140B55 IMPULSE ENTERPRISE $799.47 CABLE 1406% INDUSTRIAL AIR COMPRESSOR $345.36 COMPRESSOR PARTS 140857 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $282.98 CONNECTORS 140858 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS 5624.41 BATTERIES 140059 JAMISON ENGINEERING $10.418.55 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 140660 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY. $1.194.66 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 140861 JAYS CATERING $297.88 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE 140862 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $326.09 ELECTRIC PARTS 140863 JONES INDUSTRIAL HARDWARE CO. $1.920.65 PUMP 140864 KAMAN BEARINGS B SUPPLY $286.19 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 140866 KING BEARING,INC. $1,838.81 MACHINE SUPPLIES 140866 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $1.573.13 TOOLS 140867 KURZ INSTRUMENTS.INC. $2,962.37 METER 14088E LA LIQUID HANDLING SYSTEMS $105.19 PUMP PARTS 140869 LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT L.LAVOIE $136.00 LEGAL SERVICES-NTTZEN 140870 LEGI-TECH $320.00 COMPUTER SERVICES 140871 LEYBOLD VACUUM PRODUCTS $191.55 LAB SUPPLIES 140872 LIEBERTCORPORATION $479.60 ELECTRIC PARTS 140873 LIMITORGUE CORP. $3,198.59 VALVES FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1W12194 PAGE" REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10/19194 POSTING DATE 10/19M WARRANT NO. AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 140874 K.P.LINDSTROM.INC. $8.249.26 CONSULTING SERV.-ENVIRON.M.0.12-9-90 140075 LORAIN PRODUCTS $1,317.76 SERVICE AGREEMENT 140876 LOTUS DEVELOPMENT CORP. $75.D4 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 140877 LUX SCIENTIFIC INST.CORP. $1f0.55 LAB SUPPLIES 14D878 MULTILIN,INC. $2,614.90 ELECTRIC PARTS 140879 MPS $95,53 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 140880 MANDIC MOTORS $98.00 TOWING SERVICES 140881 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION.INC. $9,271 U0 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 140882 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $504.33 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 140883 MCGRAW-HILL PUBLICATIONS CO. $128D8 PUBLICATION 140884 CHUCK MCRANEY $314.43 REIMBURSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE 140885 MEASUREMENT VARIABLES $1,311.99 ELECTRIC PARTS 140886 MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. $173.73 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 14N87 MERRILL LYNCH CAPITAL MARKETS $74,601.71 COP REMARKETING AGREEMENT TT1 1408M MICROBIAL INSIGHTS,INC. $749.91 CONSULTING SERVICES M.0./1-18.92 X 140889 MICROSICS CORPORATION $98.15 CHEMICALS ��. 140890 MIDWAY MFG.B MACHINING $3.135.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS CO 140891 MISCO $917.89 ENGINE PARTS 140892 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3,209A7 UNIFORM RENTALS 140893 MITCHELL INTERNATIONAL,INC. $148.70 PUBLICATION CA 140894 MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION $1,041,690.00 CONSTRUCTION 14-14A r 140895 MONITOR LABS $1,750.87 INSTRUMENT PARTS 140898 MONTGOMERY WATSON $18.000.00 OCRWRP FEASIBILITY STUDY 140897 MOTION INDUSTRIES,INC. $201.98 MECHANICAL PARTS 140898 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOC. $95.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES 140899 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES,INC. $9,786.38 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 140M NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $370.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 140901 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $152.08 SAFETY FILM RENTALS 140902 RORY NELSON $24,400.0D DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL 140903 NEWARK ELECTRONICS $193.64 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 1409D4 NORTHWEST CARBON $3,455.13 CHEMICALS 140905 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES S798.32 SAFETY GLASSES 140906 OFFICE PAVILIONSIINTERIOR RESOURCES $141.12 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 140907 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $2,542.28 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 140908 ORANGE COURIER $89.10 COURIER SERVICES 140909 ORANGE VALVE 6 FITTING CO. $1.567.35 FITTINGS 140910 CO OF ORANGE-AUDITOR CONTROLLER $4,840.00 HEALTH SERVICE FEE 140911 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $60D.00 DEFERRED COMP TAXES 140912 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $19.225.61 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP 140913 COUNTY OF ORANGE $11,000.00 SEWER LINE PROTECTION M01,8&94 140914 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT $70,005.00 GAP WATER USE M.O.6-M3 140915 PGC SCIENRFICS CORPORATION $60.00 LAB SUPPLIES 140916 PARASITOLOGY RESEARCH LABS $217.00 LAB SUPPLIES 140917 PACO SALES $205.80 PAINT SUPPLIES 140918 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $1.337.34 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 140919 PACIFIC PARTS $3.282.95 INSTRUMENT PARTS FUNDING 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10I12 PAGE DS REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAI010119N4 POSTING DATE IWIO194 WARRANT NO. AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 140920 PACIFIC PROCESS EQUIPMENT E35D08 PUMP PARTS 140921 PACIFIC BELL 619.73 TELEPHONE SERVICES 140922 PACIFIC WATER CONDITIONING CO. $230.40 EQUIPMENT RENTALS 140923 PACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS $7.734,00 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS 140924 PARTS UNLIMITED $371.61 TRUCK PARTS 140925 KPMG PEAT MARWICK CPA 518.611.00 AUDITING SERVICES WOS.11.94 140926 PEDERSON COMMUNICATIONS $5,71109 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 140927 PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION $3,57868 US SUPPLIES 140928 PIMA ORO SYSTEMS,INC. 5140,3B8.40 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.5491 140929 POLY ENTERPRISES,INC. 5608.79 SAFETY SUPPLIES 140930 RHONE POULENE 54,325.89 CHEMICALS 140931 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $272,00 ICE 140932 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. 51,715.43 TRASH REMOVAL 140933 THE REGISTER 6683.00 NOTICES BADS m 140930 REISH MARINE STUDIES.INC. 5540.00 OCEAN MONITORING X 140935 RESEARCH PRODUCTS INT.CORP. $405.70 LAB SUPPLIES = 1409M ROSEMOUNT ANALYTICAL S1.OD9.42 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 140937 ROTANIUM PRODUCTS CO. $289.46 ELECTRIC PARTS 140938 $OR.INC. $87.40 INSTRUMENT PARTS 140939 SANCON ENGINEERING,INC. $7.000.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES to 140940 SAWA AM ELECTRIC MOTORS $732.70 ELECTRIC PARTS 1 140MI SARBS-POC $1.200.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION Ln 140N2 SANTA FE BAG CO. $32.05 FREIGHT 140943 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $67.42 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 140944 SEA COAST DESIGNS 5598.23 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 140945 SHURELUCK SALES $3.381.93 TOOLSIHARDWARE 140940 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO. $215.45 PUBLICATION 140947 SNAP43N T00LS CORP. $1.337.52 TOOLS 140948 SOUTH COAST WATER $103.25 LAB SUPPLIES 140949 SOUTHERN CALIF.EDISON CO. $2.336.91 POWER 1409M SO CALIF.EDISON CO. $32.741.38 POWER 140951 SO.CAL.OAS.CO. $10.549.80 NATURAL GAS 140952 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. $21.389.20 DIESEUUNLEADED FUEL 140953 SOUTH SHORE WINDOW MAINT. $2.083.33 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1409M SOUVENIR PHOTO $111.51 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 140955 SPARKLET7S DRINKING WATER $2.737.81 DRINKING WATERICOOLER RENTALS 140956 STATEWIDE INSTALLERS 53,880.00 BUILDING REPAIRS 140957 GARY G.STREED $5,332.90 REIMS.PETTY CASH,TRAINING 8 TRAVEL 140958 SULLIVAN.WORKMAN B DEE,TRUST $101.00 REIMBURSE COURT FEES 140959 SUNSET FORD $856.12 TRUCK PARTS 140960 SUPER CHEM CORP. $1.338.85 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 140961 SURVEYORS SERVICE CO. $83.39 TOOLS 140962 TALENT TREE PERSONNEL SERVICES $2,740.04 TEMPORARY PERSONNEL SERVICES 140963 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $528.41 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 140964 TECHNOMIC PUBLISHING CO,INC. $155.00 BOOKS 140985 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $496.70 MECHANICAL PARTS f f ,ND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL f PROCESSING GATE 10I12AN PAGE 06 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10119M POSTING DATE IW19M WARRANT NO. AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 140966 THOMPSON PUBLISHING GROUP 5238.00 PUBLICATION 140967 TONYS LOCK 8 SAFE SERVICE $2N.78 LOCKS 8 KEYS 140968 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES $1.081.78 TRAVEL SERVICES MGS-8-94 140969 TROPICAL PI"NURSERY,INC. E3.455.64 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.C.5-11.94 140970 TRUCK 8 AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $718.66 TRUCK PARTS 140971 TRUESDAIL LABS $4.384.98 LAB SERVICES 140972 JG TUCKER 8 SON,INC. 56,269.46 INSTRUMENT PARTS 14D973 CITY OF TUSTIN $7.907.75 EMERGENCY SEWER REPAIRS 140974 TWINING LABORATORIES $18,97162 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-13-94 140975 U.S.AUTO GLASS CENTERS $60,00 TRUCK PARTS 140976 ULTRASCIENTIFIC $810.00 LAB SUPPLIES 14D977 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT $227.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 140978 UNISOURCE WOR BUTLER PAPER $570.99 OFFICE SUPPLIES 140979 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $669.21 PARCEL SERVICES 14098D UNIVERSITY MICROFILM,INC. $71.66 PUBLICATION TIT 140981 VWR SCIENTIFIC $790.25 LAB SUPPLIES X 140982 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $4.693.58 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 2 1409" VERUW ANALYTICAL L INSTRUMENTS $541$235.00 LAB PLUMBING ES �--I 140984 VERNFS PLUMBING E$24.00 LANDSCAPING VICES SUPPLIES � 140965 VILLAGE NURSERIES E2/.44 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES lA 140986 VULCAN PEROXIDATION SYSTEMS $12,214.29 CHEMICALS M.O.1&94 140987 GUY L.WARDEN 8 SONS 51,144.85 PLUMBING SUPPLIES OY 140988 WEATHER B WIND INSTRUMENT $661.56 SAFETY SUPPLIES 140989 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $20,303.60 CAUSTIC SODA B HYPOCHLORIDE M.0.8.12-9264-0194 140990 WESTARE SUPPLY CO. $74,02 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 140991 XEROX CORP. $11,983.06 COPIER LEASES TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 1011914 $2,513,477.67 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1W12M4 PAGE 07 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL SUMMARY AMOUNT 81 OPER FUND 7.121.93 82 GRER FUND 22.073.94 82 CAP FAC FUND 18,011.00 63 OPER FUND 48.09524 93 CAP FAC FUND 27,427.40 45 OPER FUND 10,910.97 85 CAP FAC FUND 1,742.34 AB CRIER FUND 11.748.63 46 CAP FAC FUND 13.111.19 87 GRER FUND 14,655.12 61/GRER FUND 7.213.17 411 CAP FAC FUND 165,675.69 Rl 1113 0PER FUND 101.63 X 014 OPER FUND 597.83 2 414 CAP FAC FUND 1,059,067.28 W 0596 CAP FAC FUND 1.956.30 87614 OPER FUND 691.17 JT GRER FUND 737,508.19 CORF 157.528.43 �1 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND 60,649.18 �1 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL 147,479.28 $2,513.477.87 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING AGENDA DECEMBER 14, 1994 Agenda Item (8): consideration of roll can vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts (each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District). Summary See attached listing of claim payments. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of payment of claims listing. .wao�wseasmizue FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 10I27I94 PAGE REP0RTNUMSERAP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID I ND2J91 POSTING DATE 11N2194 WARRANT W. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 141015 AG TECH COMPANY 554,354.63 RESIDUALS REMOVAL 111.O.169-91 141016 AT&T-MEGACOMSERVICE $126.50 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 141017 AT&T-MEGACOM SERVICE $971.45 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 141018 AT&T-PROWATTS $560.40 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 141019 AT&T-CELLULAR CR&R $6.41 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 141020 ADVANOO CONSTRUCTORS.INC. $556,221.15 CONSTRUCTION Pt-3&1 141021 AIR CLEANING SPECIALISTS $1,2W.66 ELECTRIC PARTS 141022 AIR COLD SUPPLY,INC. $99.38 AIR CONDITIONING SUPPLIES 141023 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $36,222.50 O&M AGREEMENT MY GEN.SYST.M.0.8A-89 141024 AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR MICROBIOLOGY 8105.99 LAB SUPPLIES 141W5 AMERICAN TYPE CULTURE COLLECTION $2,5W.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 141026 CHARLES E.ANDERSON 51.M.00 FIRE HYDRANT REPLACEMENT 1410W ANTHONY PEST CONTROL 5195.00 SERMCEAGREEMENT 141028 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $574.24 NOTICES&ADS 141029 APPLIED SIOSYSTEMS,INC. 5730.00 LAB SERVICES 141030 ACS(APPUED COMPUTER SOLUTION) 5163.52 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 141031 ABC LABORATORIES S1,732.50 TAB SERVICES 141032 ARMOR-VAC 53R.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 141033 ARROWHEAD ELECTRIC CORP. $164.67 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 1410M ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE,INC. $546.60 WASTE REMOVAL 141035 AMSA $225.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 1410M RANDOLPHAUSTINCO. 5411.00 LABSUPPLIES 141037 BFI MEOICAL WASTE SYSTEMS $59.61) WASTE DISPOSAL 14103E BFI PORTABLE SERVICES 5104.91 PORTABLE RESTROOM 141MS BKK LANDFILL 532,790.87 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.M9-91 14104D SAW SAFETY B SUPPLY $1,278.13 SAFETY SUPPLIES MINT BATTERY SPECIALTIES 5449AD BATTERIES 141042 BAKTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $13.637.94 LAB SUPPLIES 141D43 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. 579.95 TRUCK WASH TICKETS 141M BELL SECURITY S779.95 SECURITY SERVICES 141045 BISHOPCOMPANY $612.20 TOOLS 141M BOERINGER MANNHEIM S49&m LAB SUPPLIES 141047 SON-ARUES $75.75 TRUCK PARTS 141M BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. SSO,SS8.81 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-198 7-22 141D49 BROOKSINSTRUMENTM. $836.31 INSTRUMENT PARTS 141DW BUDGETJANITORMI. $3,357.01) JANITORIAL SERVICES 141051 BUSH&ASSOCIATES,INC. 514,244.OD SURVEYING SERVICES 1,10.6894 141052 BUY-CHEM DISTRIBUTORS S/82.91 JANITORIAL SERVICES 14100 C M I $1,010.87 INSTRUMENT PARTS 141054 CS COMPANY SD,IT2.30 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 141055 CAD ONE,INC. $921.64 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 141D56 CALIF ASSOC.OF SAN.AGENCIES 5550.00 WORK CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 141057 CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL STATISTIC $400.00 FINANCIAL STATISTICS ANALYSIS 141M JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS 54,932.64 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI.38 1410N CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. 5311.71) OFFICE SUPPUES 1410W CENTURY SAFETY INST.&SUPPLY SBTB.TT SAFETY SUPPLIES FUNDING 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10/27/94 PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMSPAIDIVOM POSTINGDATEIV02194 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 141MI CERFNET $59.65 COMPUTER SERVICES 141002 CLEAN AIR REPORT E525.CD SUBSCRIPTION 141053 COAST DISTRIBUTION $446.09 ENGINEERING SUPPLIES 141M COLICH S SONS $316.629.70 CONSTRUCTION2-&R7 141065 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $497.81 WELDINGSUPPLIES 141066 COMPUSA,INC. $87.16 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 141D67 CONNEL GM PARTS I DIV. 5189.37 TRUCK PARTS 14108E CON-WAY WESTERN EXPRESS $91.50 FREIGHT CHARGES MOBS CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $472.47 ELECTRIC PARTS 141070 CONTINENTALAIR TOOLS INC. $372.53 TOOLS 141071 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO. 84,832.59 CHLORINE M.0.10-11.93 141072 CONTINENTALGRAPHICS $154.90 OFFICE SUPPLIES 141073 COOPER INDUSTRIES,INC. $760.68 COMPRESSOR PARTS 141074 COUNTERPARTENTERPRISES $5.119.53 FITTINGS 141076 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $460.75 ELECTRIC PARTS 141076 STATE DEPT.OF TRANSPORTATION $17,000.00 UTILITY AGREEMENT 141077 STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL S40.00 PERMIT FEES 141076 DIVE,INC. 534.40 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 141070 DAMES B MOORE $15.358.56 ENGINEERING SERVICES Pt-38.3 141080 DELL COMPUTER CORP. $140.02 INSTRUMENT PARTS 141051 DELOITTE B TOUGHS $12,600.00 FIN.INFO.SYSTEM M.O.]-9.94 141082 DEZURICK AND/OR CS CO. 0.765.83 VALVES 141083 DIETERICH-POSTOO. $1.095.17 PRINNNG SUPPLIES 141M DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $1.471.40 SERVICEAGREEMENT 141085 DIVERSIFIED FASTENING SYSTEMS 8457.68 TOOLS 141086 ROBERT F.DRIVER ASSOC. SSAGD.00 PERSONNEL INSURANCE CONSULTANT 141087 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. 5994.96 PAINT SUPPLIES 141088 OVALS SALES $205.94 FITTINGS 141089 ESP NORTH $581.75 FIRINGS 141090 ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLING $2.019.01 LAB SUPPLIES 141091 EASTMAN.INC. $5,01.76 OFFICE SUPPLIES 141092 EDWARDS HIGH VACUUM INTER. $75.70 LAB SUPPLIES 141093 ENCHANTER,INC. SSp40.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.8-10.92 141OW ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL SERVICE E490.00 LAB SUPPLIES 141095 ENVIRONMENTAL FROM USA $2,067.72 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 1410% ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $70.50 LAB SERVICES 141097 EOS INSTITUTE $100.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 1410H EXETER SOFTWARE $161.00 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 1410H MARSHALL FAIRRES $78.05 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 141100 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE 516,84372 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MA.10-9-91 141101 FARR CO. S0,792.80 FILTERS 141102 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $740.35 AIR FREIGHT 141103 FILTERLINE CORP. E167.28 PUMP PARTS 141104 FIRST CHOICE $121.00 TELEPHONE M108 FISCHER B PORTER CO. $323.97 INSTRUMENT PARTS 141106 FISHERSCIENDFICCO. $80.0 LAB SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1=7194 PAGE 3 REPORTNUMBERAP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID IIM2094 POSTING DATE IVWI I WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 141107 FISIONS INSTRUMENTS 5333.64 IAS SUPPLIES 141108 PLO-SYSTEMS 52,078.61 PUMP PARTS 141108 FORMA SCIENTIFIC,INC. $511. 0 SERVICEAGREEMENT 141110 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $277.43 PHOTO SUPPLIES 141111 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $576.40 PAINT SUPPLIES 141112 THEFOKBOROCO. $4.439.59 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 141113 GET,INC. $59.25 COMPUTER PARTS 141114 GTE TELEPHONE OPERATIONS $5,moo TELEPHONE LINE RELOCATION DIST 3 141115 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $349.11 CHEMICALS 10116 GENERAL BINDING CORP. 5786.42 PRINTING SUPPLIES 141117 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $255.57 ELECTRIC PARTS 141118 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $3,513.84 TELEPHONE SERVICES 141119 GIERUCHAITCHELL,INC. $20,067.67 MECHARICAL PARTS 1411" GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $4,268.81 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 141121 GRASBY S.T.L. $2,864.00 ENGINE PARTS 141122 DOA CONSULTANTS $12,274.W SURVEYINGSERVICESM.O.68-94 141123 HACH COMPANY $1,913.01 LAB SUPPLIES 141124 HAESTAD METHODS 52N.00 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 1411M FREDA HARPER $100.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 141128 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $868.68 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 1411N HATCH 8 KIRK INC. $8,625.39 ELECTRIC PARTS 141128 PL HAWN CO,INC. sm." FILTERS 141129 MERU CLAIM MANAGEMENT $2.083.33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN. 1411M HILTL INC. $686.49 SMALL HARDWARE 141131 HOERBIGER CVS CALIF.,INC. $4N.47 COMPRESSOR PARTS 1411M HOME DEPOT 5214.39 HARDWARE 14t133 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $1,850.03 PAINT SUPPLIES 1411M CITYOFHUNTINGTONBEACH $31.60 WATER USE 1411M ORANGE COUNTY FED CREDIT UNION $680.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 141IN IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL 599,602.16 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.Odt-18-92 141137 INDUSTRIAL AIR COMPRESSOR E777.32 HARDWARE 141138 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS 5722.12 CONNECTORS 1411M MINE PHOTO GRAPHICS 513.09 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 141140 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT 576.42 WATER USE 141141 J.D.I.TECHNOLOGIES,INC. $807.50 SERVICE AGREEMENT 141142 JAMISON ENGINEERING 525,061.90 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 141143 GREATWESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY. 51,011.84 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 141144 JAYS CATERING $545.33 DIRECTORS MEETING EKPENSE 141145 JIMS SUSPENSION SERVICE 525.00 TRUCK REPAIRS 14110 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $161.55 ELECTRIC PARTS 141147 JONES INDUSTRIAL HARDWARE CO. 5126.46 TOOLS 141148 THE KEITH COMPANIES 51,413.W ENGINEERING SERVICES 3-6R 141149 KING BEARING,INC. $695.46 MACHINE SUPPLIES 141150 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $5,379.91 INSTRUMENT PARTS 141151 LA UOUID HANDLING SYSTEMS $159.11 PUMP PARTS 1411M LAMBDA FLORESCENCE $72.50 LAB SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10127AM PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 11N2AM POSTING DATE 11MVIM WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 141153 LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT L.LAVOIE SN5.55 LEGAL SERVICES-NITZEN 141154 LAYMAN,JONES 9 DYE,LAWYERS $887.25 LEGAL SERVICES M.O. 1192 141156 LEHMAN BROTHERS,INC. 56,301.37 REMARKETINGFEE 141195 LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INS.CO. $3,804.79 DEFERRED COMP TRUSTEE 141157 MBCAPPLIEDENVIRONMENTAL $I,940.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6.1692 141158 MDT BIOLOGIC COMPANY 5477.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 14110 MPS 533.32 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 141100 MACOMCO $19432 SERVICE AGREEMENT 141161 MAG SYSTEMS 5520 80 ELECTRIC PARTS 141162 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $W8.840.0D CONSTRUCTION P242-2 141163 MARVAC ELECTRONICS 5257.27 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 141184 MEASUREMENT VARIABLES 52,429A3 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 141165 MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. $1.460.40 INSTRUMENTSUPPUES MINIS METAL SUPPLY,INC. $1,160.47 METALS 141167 MICROBICS CORPORAAON $165.54 LAB SUPPLIES 141168 MIDWAY MFG.B MACHINING $8.617.16 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 141169 MIGHTY MOVER TRAILERS $2,020.53 TRAILER 1411M MISCO $1.954.09 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 141171 MISSION INDUSTRIES 53,529.37 UNIFORM RENTALS 1411172 PAUL MONROE $107.02 ENGINE PARTS 141173 MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES 52,550.00 LAB SERVICES 141174 MORTON SALT 5404.68 SALT 141175 MOTION INDUSTRIES,INC. SI.M.44 HARDWARE 10176 NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCANADA $279.00 SUBSCRIPTION 141177 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $964.20 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 141175 NELSONDUNN,INC. $750,32 VALVE PARTS 141179 NETWORKGENERAL $22,289.38 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 141190 NEUTRON 56,908.70 CHEMICALS 141161 BY NIELSON SERVICE,INC. $765.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 141182 NUSONICS DIVNESA LABS $2.218.19 INSTRUMENT PARTS 141163 OFFICE PAVIUONSANTERIOR RESOURCES $1,778.68 OFFICE FURNITURE 141164 THE OHMART CORP. E976.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 141185 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. $200.66 TRUCK PARTS 141188 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $3,759.69 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 141107 ORANGECOURIER $133.65 COURIER SERVICES 141105 ORANGE VALVE 6 FITTING CO. 5284.88 FITTINGS 141189 OXYGEN SERVICE $6.529.85 SPECIALTY GASES 141190 COUNTY OF ORANGE $6.155.31 SERVICEAGREEMENT 141191 PACIFIC PARTS $15,161.90 INSTRUMENT PARTS 1411M PACIFIC BELL $173.85 TELEPHONE SERVICES 141193 PACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS $30062 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS 1411% PARAGON CABLE $38.78 CABLE SERVICES 141195 PARKSON CORPORATION $25,756.38 PLUMBING PARTS 1411M PARTS UNLIMITED $1.40.70 TRUCK PARTS 1411P PASCAL 6 LUDWIG.INC. $241,211.52 CONSTRUCTION PI-38.2 1411N PASCAL AND LUDWIG $149,127.W CONSTRUCTION P2431 1` C FUND NO 91M - n DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE IM7194 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 11g2184 POSTING DATE IIN WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 1411" PATTEN CORP/TAYLOR INSTR. S852.73 STRIP CHARTS 141200 KPMG PEAT MARWICK CPA S2,6X00 AUDITING SERVICES M.O.Si 1-S4 141201 PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION $1,665.00 LAB SUPPLIES 141202 PERKIN-ELMERCORPORATION $148.70 LAB SUPPLIES 141=3 PIMA ORO SYSTEMS,INC. $142,530.20 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.54491 1412D4 PITNEY BOWES $295.74 POSTAGE MACHINE SERVICE AGREEMENT 141205 POLY ENTERPRISES $301.70 SAFETY SUPPLIES 141M POLYMETRICS,INC. S1,262.75 SERVICE AGREEMENT 141207 RHONE POULENE $24,574.76 CHEMICALS 1412M POWER TRACK,INC. $67.05 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-92 141208 PRESENTATION PRODUCTS $711.39 OFFICE SUPPLIES 141210 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $96.00 ICE 141211 PROCESS EQUIPMENT COMPANY S3.522.17 PUMP PARTS 141212 PUBLIC FINANCIAL MGMT.,INC. $3,759.66 FINANCIAL CONSULTING SERVICES M.0.640-94 141213 PULSAFEEDER $1.740.41 PUMP PARTS 141214 R S R INSTRUMENTS $21&N ELECTRIC PARTS 141215 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO. $200.13 LAB SUPPLIES 141216 RAYCOM SYSTEMS,INC. S42,119.58 FIBRE OPTIC M.0.12-8-93 141217 RED MG SHOES $730.12 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 41216 MICHAEL G.REIDELER $18.71 INSURANCE REIMBURSEMENT 141219 MWUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $716.10 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 141220 REWES ENGINEERING CO. $1.577.38 BUILDING MATERIALS 141221 RUSH ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES S450A0 ENGINEERING SERVICES 1412M S.B.E. $168.35 HAZARDOUS WASTE TA% 141223 SANCON ENGINEERING,INC. $1,250.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 141224 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $78.08 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 141225 SAW SERVICE OF AMERICA,INC. S774.83 TOOLS 141226 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INPL S219.287.82 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6- 04 141M R.CRAIG SCOTT&ASSOC. $13.460.15 LEGAL SERVICES-PERSONNEL ISSUES 141228 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. 5487.50 SPECIALTYGASES 141M9 SEA COAST DESIGNS $64.60 TOOLS 141230 SEARS SERVICE CENTER $34.60 TRUCK PARTS 141231 SHAMROCKSUPPLY $5,366.65 TOOLS 141M SHURELUCKSALES $11,015.27 ENGINE PARTS 141M SO CALIF.EDISON CO. $95,424.31 POWER 141234 SO.CAL,GA3.CO. $104.769.56 NATURAL GAS 1412H SOUVENIR PHOTO $183.49 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 1412M WESTALLOY,INC. $1,069.74 WELDING SUPPLIES 141237 SPECIALIZED PRODUCTS CO. S47.88 OFFICE SUPPLIES 141238 SPEK INDUSTRIES,INC. $68B.87 LAB SUPPLIES 141239 SPIRE TECHNOLOGIES SYS DIV. $839.06 COMPUTER SOFTWARE LICENCE 141240 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION $235.00 HAZARDOUS WASTE TM 141241 SMRLINGART S24.77 OFFICE SUPPLIES 141242 STEVENS PUBLISHING CORP. $519.00 SUBSCRIPTION 141243 STRATAGENE $465M LAB SUPPLIES 141244 GMY G.STREED $5,368.91 REIMB.PETTY CASH,TRAINING&TRAVEL FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10R1/94 PAGE REPORTNUMBERAP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMSPAIDIIffi 4 POSTING DATE II/02/B0 WARRANT NO. VENDOR 141245 SUMMIT STEEL SBSOA4 METAL 141246 SUNSET FORD $251.22 TRUCK PARTS 141247 SUPELCO,INC. $817.28 LAB SUPPLIES 141249 SUPER CHEM CORP. $379.88 CHEMICALS 141249 SUPER POWER PRODUCTS $155.16 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 141HO TCH ASSOCIATES SB20.00 LAB SUPPLIES 141251 TALENT TREE PERSONNEL SERVICES $3.016.74 TEMPORARY PERSONNEL 141252 TEKDRAULICS $780.00 MECHANICALPARTS 141253 THERMOJARRELLASH CORP. 5122.701.53 LABEOUIPMENTM.0.6 N 1412U THOMAS FISH CO. $107.25 LAB SUPPLIES 1412M TIGER DIRECT 5MAS COMPUTER SOFTWARE 1412M TOLEDO SCALE CORP. $490.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 141257 TONYS LOCK 8 SAFE SERVICE $465.92 LOCKS 8 KEYS 141MS TRANS $1,1D9.12 ELECTRIC PARTS 141M9 THE TRANS COMPANY S2,2M.W ELECTRIC PARTS 141M TRAVEL EXECUTIVES $4,707.00 TRAVEL SERVICES M.0.6-8-94 141261 TRESOR ELECTRONICS $1.022.17 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 141262 TRUCK 8 AUTO SUPPLY,INC. 5644.31 TRUCK PARTS MIND TRUESMI-LABS $3,047.16 LAB SERVICES 141264 JG TUCKER 8 SON,INC. $551.14 INSTRUMENT PARTS 141M TWINING LASOMTORIES $14,140.42 SOIL TESTING M.0.7-1594 1412M USA SCIENTIFIC PLASTICS $176.24 LAB SUPPLIES 141267 U.S.C.SPONSORED PROJECTS AMT. W80.28 TECHNICAL SERVICES 141NO ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $717.00 LAB SUPPLIES 141N9 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 5553.67 PARCEL SERVICES 141270 VWR SCIENTIFIC $1,894.35 LAB SUPPLIES 141271 VAIN CORPORATION $110.83 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 141272 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY C.O. $3.041.01 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 141273 VANIER BUSINESS FORMS $M.67 OFFICE SUPPLIES 141274 VERTEX SYSTEMS $722.50 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT 141275 VILLAGE NURSERIES 5457.12 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 141276 VORTEX INDUSTRIES $394.20 BUILDING REPAIRS 141277 VULCAN PEROXIDATION SYSTEMS $7.058.69 CHEMICALS M.O.3-9-94 1412M CARL WARREN B CO. $544.57 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR 141279 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $30.065.62 CAUSTIC SODA B HYPOCHLORIDE M.O.B 12-92 8 44 3.94 1412M WEST4.ITE SUPPLY CO. $".90 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 141281 WESCO 52,973.80 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 141252 MATED 5800.47 LAB SUPPLIES 14120 ROURKE.WOODRUFF B SPRADLIN $37.421.01 LEGAL SERVICES M.02-19.92 141204 XEROX CORP. $5.828.67 COPIER LEASES 14120 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. 3304AI LAB SUPPLIES 1412M JOHNSON YOKOGAWA CORP. $471.75 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 141257 RICHARD YOUNG PRODUCTS $927.72 PRINUIG SUPPLIES 1412H RICHARD B.EDGAR 5200.D0 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION TOTAL CLAIMS PAID tIA12/B4 59,292,447.34 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE l(W7M PAGE? REPORTNUMBERA 43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 11A72J91 POSTING DATE 11A72/90 SUMMARY AMOUNT 01 OPER FUND 1,415.W 02 OPER FUND 3,229.20 02 OAP FAC FUND 330.773.20 03 OPER FUND 37,673.41 03 CAP FAC FUND 47,435.71 05OPER FUND 33,433.66 05 CAP FAC FUND 050.D0 07 OPER FUND 0,601.57 A7 CAP FAC FUND 11,081.8D 011 OPER FUND 10,572.17 011 CAP FAC FUND WAS 014 OPER FUND 106.37 014 CAP FAC FUND 7,837.80 055E OPER FUND 2,126.58 0586 CAP FAC FUND 26.62 0657 OPER FUND 32,664.51 07814 OPER FUND 0,731 a JT OPER FUND 97 ,192.67 CORF 1,607,155.50 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $15,140.W J<DIST WORKING CAPITAL 3184,933.95 33,292.M7,N FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1 V09194 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER APO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 11116AM POSTING DATE 11RM94 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 141318 AG TECH COMPANY $100,027.90 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10.9-01 141319 ATM AA,INC. $9,59079 LAB SERVICES 141320 AT&T-MEGACOMSERVICE E4,772.13 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 141321 ADVANCED ENGINE TECH CORP. E6,324.04 MONITORING SYST.FEASIBILITY STUDY 141322 ALLIED REFRIGERATION $115.89 ELECTRIC PARTS 141323 ALLIED SUPPLY CO. $493.50 INSTRUMENT 141324 ALLOSEP E17710 LAB SUPPLIES 141325 AMELCO CONSTRUCTION $7,234.91 CONSTRUCTION P2d}1 141326 AMERICAN BANKER NEWSLETTER E595.00 SUBSCRIPTION 141327 AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $619.73 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 141378 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION E1,885.30 SEWER REPAIRS 141M ANDREW$GLASS CO. $727.07 LAB SUPPLIES 141330 ANGEL SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS $467.72 LAB SUPPLIES 141331 AND(TER-DISTRIBUTION E1,194.48 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 1413M ANTHONY PEST CONTROL $135.00 SERVICEAGREEMENT 141333 APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS,INC. $310.50 LAB SUPPLIES 1413M ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $1.531.52 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 141M "BURY ENVIRONMENTAL SEW. SWIX) WASTE OIL REMOVAL 141336 ASSOCIATED VACUUM TECH,INC. $713.13 COMPRESSOR PARTS 141M7 AMSA $14,642.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES 141338 RANDOLPH AUSTIN 00. E930.69 FITTINGS 1413M AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $3.678.67 PAYROLL SERVICES 141M BRW SAFETY B SUPPLY E378.69 SAFETY SUPPLIES 141341 BATTERY SPECIALTIES E1,258.44 BATTERIES 141M2 BAKKER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. S4,021.50 US SUPPLIES 141343 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. E517.90 TRUCK WASH TICKETS 141W BELL SECURITY $6.015.50 SECURITY SERVICES 141345 BENZ ENGINEERING,INC. $1,417.53 COMPRESSOR PARTS 141MS BERG POWER ENGINEERS.INC. $5.980A0 ELECTRICAL SERVICES 141M7 BID TECH NET,INC. $4.90 SERVICEAGREEMENTS 14134E BONA RUES $212.33 TRUCK PARTS 1H319 SORNEMANN PUMPS,INC. $1,325.20 PUMP PARTS 141350 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $38.875.12 ENGINEERING SERVICES P141 141MI BREIIERCONSTRUCTION $918.12 TOOLS 141352 BRENNER-FIEDLER&ASSOC.,INC. $575.05 COMPRESSOR PARTS 141M3 SNI BOOKS $1.755.18 PUBLICATION 141350 THE BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFFAIRS $2,033.24 PUBLICATIONS 14130 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. $1,059.33 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 141356 BUSINESS NEWS PUBLISHING IISBDD SUBSCRIPTION 141357 BUYCHEM DISTRIBUTORS $368.51 JANITORUILSERVICES 14135E CS COMPANY $5.764.81 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 141359 CNPCA FILM FESTIVAL $75.01) REGISTRATION FEES 141ND CALTROL,INC. St,424.99 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 141MI CALIFORNIA AUTO COLLISION,INC. 5494.12 TRUCK PARTS 141362 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $5.493.07 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI.38 141363 CASHCO M1.31 VALVES FUND NO 91M - H DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 11IO9194 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMSPAID11I16A34 POSTINGOATE11I16.H4 YGIMANTNO. VENDOR AMOUNT 141364 CENTURY SAFETY INST.6 SUPPLY 51799.9/ SAFETY SUPPUES 141355 CLARK CONSULTANTS $2,080.00 ELECTRICAL CONSULTING 141366 COUCH AND SONS 52,200.00 CONSTRUCTION 5J74 141367 COUCH 6 SONS $231.024.15 CONSTRUCTION 2-4R1 141368 JANICE MC NALLY $475.00 EMPLOYEETRAINING 141369 CONNEL GM PARTS I DIV. $132.71 TRUCK PARTS 1413M CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC. $146,18 TOOLS 141371 COOPER INDUSTRIES,INC. $2.062.01 ENGINE PARTS 141372 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY 1102.30 TRUCK PARTS 141373 COUNTERPART ENTERPRISES SSD6.48 FITTINGS 141T4 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 53037T ELECTRIC PARTS 141375 T.H.CREEARS CORP. "10.55 VALVES 141NS STATE OF CALIFORNIA S7,919,W STATE UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 1413" SWRCBIAFRS 510, 00.00 ANNUALWASTE DISCHARGE FEES 141378 SWRCBISW FEES $250.00 ANNUAL WASTE DISCHARGE FEES 141379 DME,INC. $4.195.79 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 141380 J.W.D'ANGELO CO.,INC. $256.45 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 141MI DECUS $4,024.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 141382 DELTA FOAM PRODUCTS $138.20 LAB SUPPLIES 141353 DEZURICKANOIORCSCO. $1.617.11 VALVES 141384 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $2,823.03 SERVICEAGREEMENTS 141MS DISPOSABLE WASTE SYS. $5,86176 MECHANICAL PARTS 141M6 DIVERSIFIED FASTENING SYSTEMS f40.92 SHALL TOOLS 141387 COVER ELEVATOR COMPANY S94UB0 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 141368 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $1,646M PAINT SUPPLIES 141389 DURKEE TESTING $109.87 LAB SERVICES 141390 ESP NORTH $194.18 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 141391 EASTSAN.INC. Y4.408.05 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1413N ESERHARD EQUIPMENT S228.42 TRUCK PARTS 14130 ECOANALYSIS.INC. $2.306.66 CONSULTING SERVICES 1413" ELSEVIER SCIENCE PUBLISHING $495.00 SUBSCRIPTION 141395 ENCHANTER,INC. S5,900.00 OCEANMONITORINGM.O.6.lM2 141396 FISCHER B PORTER CO. S1,140.54 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 141397 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $%.10 LAB SUPPLIES 141390 FISIONS INSTRUMENTS $190.79 LAB SUPPLIES 141399 FLOSYSTEMS $1,212.94 PUMP PARTS 1414DO FORMA SCIENTIFIC,INC. S335.00 SERVICEAGREEMENT 141401 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA S63.35 PHOTO SUPPLIES 141402 THE FOXBORO CO. $2,466.22 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 141403 FRANKLIN QUEST CO. Sln.42 OFFICE SUPPLIES 141401 GST,INC. $15,226.08 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 141405 GTE CALIFORNIA.INC. $1,900.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 141406 GAUGE REPAIR SERVICE $1.704.11 INSTRUMENTREPAIRS 141407 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. SS27.49 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 141408 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1,994m TELEPHONE SERVICES 141409 GRAPHIC CONTROLS WAS INSTRUMENT PARTS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 11109194 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMSPAID11ASM POSTING DATE 11116194 WARRANTNO. VENDOR AMOUNT 141410 GRASSY S.T.I. S231.50 ENGINE PARTS 141411 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. SN7.66 HARDWARE 141412 HACH COMPANY E366.58 LAB SUPPLIES 141413 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $1,110.41 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 141414 HATCH 8 KIRK,INC. $55.69 TRUCK PARTS 141415 HAUSER ENGINEERING S4,229.63 LAB SERVICES 141416 HERMAN MILLER,INC. S3,461.66 OFFICE FURNITURE 141417 HERB CLAIM MANAGEMENT $2p83.33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN. 10410 HEWLETTPACKARD $1,470.00 SERVICEAGREEMENT 141419 HILTI,INC. $290.45 BATTERY 141420 RC HOFFMAN AND/OR[BCD $10,276.44 METERS 141421 HOLMES S NARVER,INC. $62.413.77 ENGINEERING SERVICES P2-53 141422 HOME DEPOT $208.42 HARDWARE 141423 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $1.301.11 PAINT SUPPLIES 141424 CITYOFHUNTINGTONBEACH $19.267.50 WATER USE 141425 HUNTINGDON ENG.B ENWRON. S2.925.00 VOC VAPOR STUDY 141426 HYCLONE LABORATORIES,INC. $100." LAB SUPPLIES 141427 IDEXX 5852.63 LAB SUPPLIES 141428 IPCO SAFETY DID PACIFIC SAFETY 31p50.51 SAFETY SUPPLIES 1,11429 ISCO,INC. $101.56 INSTRUMENT 14143D IDEA MAN,INC. $1.737.01 RIDESHARE PROMOTIONS 141431 IMPERWLWEST CHEMICAL $70,224AM FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11-18-92 141432 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $249.40 CONNECTORS 141433 INGRAM PAPER S496.56 OFFICE SUPPLIES MICR INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. $89.53 TRUCK PARTS 141435 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $1,154.05 BATTERIES 141436 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $106.36 WATER USE 141437 J2 PRINTING SERVICES $92.13 PRINTING 1414M JAMISON ENGINEERING $5,61944 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 1414W GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY. $1.010.97 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 141440 JAYS CATERING $176.00 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE 141"1 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 52,44/.18 ELECTRIC PARTS 141442 KALLEEMS COMPUTER PRODUCTS E373.97 COMPUTER SUPPUES 141443 KELLY SERVICES $1,267.20 TEMPORARY PERSONNEL SERVICES 141444 KING BEARING,INC. $451.12 MACHINE SUPPLIES 14144S KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES S4,842.18 TOOLS 141446 LAIDLAW ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 59,145.12 HAZARDOUS WASTE REMOVAL 141447 LAMSON CORPORATION $ISB.N HARDWARE 141448 LAWICRANDILL,INC. $1.400.00 LEGAL SERVICES M.0l-13-9,1 141449 LEGI-TECH $320.00 COMPUTER SERVICES 141450 LEE S RO CONSULTING ENGR. $73,227.64 ENGINEERING SERVICES P140.1 141451 MACOMCO $790.76 SERVICEAGREEMENT 141452 MAD TRAN,INC. E3,600.75 TRUCK REPAIRS 141153 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $52.77 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 1414W MATT-CHLOR,INC. $1,023.07 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 141455 MCKENNA ENGR.S EQUIP. ES8.17 PUMP PARTS 1` FUND NO 9199 - .R MST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 111OW94 PAGE4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMSPAIDIVIS194 POSTINGDATEIII16I94 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 141456 MCWELCO RACK-N-BOX CO. $528.51 TRUCK PARTS 141457 MICROBICS CORPORATION $709.34 CHEMICALS 141458 MIDWAY MM 6 MACHINING $2,028.06 MACHINE SUPPLIES 141459 MISCO $839.80 MACHINE SUPPLIES 141460 MISSION INDUSTRIES $2.495,90 UNIFORM RENTALS 14MI MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION $638,893.00 CONSTRUCTION 14.1-1A 14I,RQ MOBILE HOSE AND HYDRAULIC $63,21 PUMP PARTS 141463 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES.INC. $2,500.W VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 1414M NEAL SUPPLY CO. $2.388.14 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 14140 NEUTRON S8.921.36 CHEMICALS 141466 NEW HORIZONS COMPUTER CENTER $1.899.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 1414" CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $62.98 WATERUSE 141468 NORGREN $154.63 INSTRUMENT PARTS 141469 NORTH AMERICAN VAN LINES 52,502.40 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 141470 ORACLE EDUCATION CENTER $1,75MM TRAINING REGISTRATION 141471 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. $176.59 TRUCK PARTS 141472 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO. $1,085.37 CHEMICALS 141473 ORANGE COUNTY FARM SUPPLY CO. $197.79 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 141474 ORANGE COUNTY INDUSTRIAL $255.07 ELECTRIC PARTS 141475 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $1,993.44 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 141476 ORANGE COURIER $133.65 COURIER SERVICES 1414" ORANGE VALVE B FITTING CO. $1,794.75 FITTINGS 141478 OXYGEN SERVICE $3.495.45 SPECIALTY GASES 141479 COUNTY OF ORANGE $25.00 NOTICE OF COMPLETION J-. El 141480 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT $63,720.W GAP WATER USE M.O.6.9.93 141481 PGCSCIENTIFICCORPORATION $118.55 LABSUPPLIES 141482 PNS ENTERPRISES $210.64 ENGINEERING SUPPLIES 141463 PSSI $1.437.50 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION 1414" PACCO SALES $205.80 PAINT SUPPLIES 141MS IPCO SAFETY $5,245.39 SAFETY SUPPLIES 1414M PACIFIC WATER CONDITIONING CO. $289.00 EQUIPMENT RENTALS 141487 PACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS 5484.87 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS 141485 PAGENET $1.093.95 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 1414B9 PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION 3900.50 LABSUPPLIES 141490 PHYSICIANS DESK REFERENCE $59.90 PUBLICATION 141491 PIERCE CHEMICAL COMPANY 354.00 LABSUPPLIES 141492 PIMA ONG SYSTEMS,INC. $140.740.W RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.5891 141493 POLYSPEDE $68,79 ELECTRIC PARTS 1414N POSTAGE BY PHONE $5090.50 POSTAGE 141495 POST CONSUMER PRODUCTS $1.015,38 PROMOTIONAL ITEMS 141496 PRIMAX ELECTRONICS $7543 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 1414W RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $213.35 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS 141498 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $1,715.43 TRASH REMOVAL 141499 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO. $818,20 LAB SUPPLIES 141500 REISH MARINE STUDIES.INC. $1,38000 OCEAN MONITORING 141501 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $8,729.53 PLUMBING SUPPLIES FUNDNO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 11109/94 PAGE5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 11/161" POSTING DATE 11/16M WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 1415M ROYCE PRODUCTIONS $2.350.00 VIDEO TAPE PRODUCTION 141503 RYAN-NERCO $597.90 PUMP PARTS 1415N SANTA AM ELECTRIC MOTORS $1.454.97 ELECTRIC PARTS 141505 SAWA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS 5932.60 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 141506 SANWA BANK $70.960.20 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION 14-1-1A 141507 R.CRAIG SCOTT S ASSOC. $9,31803 LEGAL SERVICES-PERSONNEL ISSUES 141605 SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS.INC. $1.251.21 LAB SUPPLIES 1415M CITY OF SEAL BEACH $316.10 WATER USE 141510 SEAL BLACK $53.88 OIL 141511 SENSUS TECHNOLOGIES $583.60 METER 141512 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $1,307.45 ELECTRIC PARTS 141513 SHURELUCK SALES S8,609.82 TOOLSAIARDWARE 141514 SIEVERS INSTRUMENTATION $795.00 LAB SUPPLIES 141515 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC 1219,81 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 141516 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP. $81.42 TOOLS 141517 SOCOASTAIRQUAUGY S11,834.31 PERMIT FEES 141516 SOUTH COAST WATER $35.00 LAB SUPPLIES 141519 SO.GAL.GAS.CO. W.357.06 NATURAL GAS 14100 SO.CALIF.WATER CO. $67.09 WATER USE 141621 SOUTHERN COUNNES OIL CO. $16,532.53 DIESELIUNLEADED FUEL 141522 STAMEN Z.SPASSOFF P.E. $500.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19-2 141523 SPIRE TECHNOLOGIES SYS.ON. $1.642.19 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 1415N SPYGLASS.INC. E528.00 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 141525 STARTEK INTERNATIONAL S607.00 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT 141526 GARY G.STREED 56.960.25 REIMS.PETTY CASH.MINING S TRAVEL 141527 SUNSET FORD $558.44 TRUCK PARTS 141520 SUPELCO.INC. $142.21 LAB SUPPLIES 141529 TALENT TREE PERSONNEL SERVICES $1,375.38 TEMPORARYPERSONNEL 141530 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $223.10 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 14101 CHARLES E.THOMAS S1.161.90 TRUCK PARTS 14102 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 5597.94 MECHANICAL PARTS 141533 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES $984.50 TRAVEL SERVICES M.O.B 1415M TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY,INC. S17.405." CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.O.5d 1-94 141636 TRUCK B AUTO SUPPLY.INC. E20.34 TRUCK PARTS 1415M MUESD/AILLABS $2.01.14 LAB SERVICES 141637 JG TUCKER 5 SON,INC. $602.73 INSTRUMENT PARTS 1415M TUSTIN DODGE S1S.19 TRUCK PARTS 141539 US.AUTOGLASSCENTERS $23106 TRUCK PARTS 141540 U.S.C.SPONSORED PROJECTS ACCT. $2,318.74 TECHNICALSERVICES 141541 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $410.11 PARCEL SERVICES 141542 VWR SCIENTIFIC SI."2.65 LAB SUPPLIES 141543 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. 5355.2E PLUMBING SUPPLIES 141W VALLEY DETROIT DIESEL $305.79 DIESEL ENGINE PARTS 141645 VANIER BUSINESS FORMS 545.9E OFFICE SUPPLIES 141W VERNE'S PLUMBING $1.161.77 PLUMBING SERVICES 141547 VILLAGE NURSERIES $257.51 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES FUNONO 910 IT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 11N9A4 PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID IIII6194 POSTING MM I II16M WARRANT NO. VENDOR 141M8 SKIPWESTCOTT $247.39 ENGINEERING SERVICES 141649 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $26,145,61 CAUSTIC SODA S HYPOCHLORIDE M.0.9-12-9284-13.94 141550 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $131,37 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 141551 WEST MARINE $353AS SAFETY SUPPLIES 141M WITEG $761.26 LAB SUPPLIES 141553 XEROXCORP. $176538 COPIERLEASES 141554 RICHARD YOUNG PRODUCTS $370.73 INSTRUMENT PARTS TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 09ID7/94 $1,961,820.54 SUMMARY AMOUNT 02 CAP FAD FUND 231,024.15 03 OPER FUND 19,456,36 03 CAP FAC FUND 4,226.93 45 OPER FUND 4.185.68 N OPER FUND 53.88 07 0PER FUND 1,910.88 011 OPER FUND 1,900.00 Ott CAP FAC FUND 9.27 014 OPER FUND 96.72 014 CAP FAC FUND 711,60.08 #MI I OPER FUND 2,5W.W 05$6 OPER FUND 255.02 0588 CAP FAC FUND 2,2W.W 07A14 OPER FUND 691.17 JT OPER FUND 575,314.85 CORE 287,781.74 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND 2,08313 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL 142.532AS $1,987,970.54 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING CATE 1112 1 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMSPAID11M0194 POSTING DATE 1U30I91 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 141678 AG TECH COMPANY 5116.182.84 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.OA1 Ml 141579 A.Q.TECH $400.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 141M AT&T-MEGACOM SERVICE $971.46 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 141601 AT&T-PROWATTS 5827.50 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 141502 ADAMSON INDUSTRIES $1.151.67 LABSUPPLIES 14150 ADVANOO CONSTRUCTORS.INC. 11I.W6.486.86 CONSTRUCTION PI-36-1 1415M AIR COLD SUPPLY,INC. $91.01 AIRCOND91ONERPMTS 141586 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS,INC. $17.788.00 0&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.O.&9.89 1415M ALTAAOBBINS $16370 INSTRUMENT PARTS 141NT AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 5621.58 SOLVENTS 141558 ANKIFER-DISTRIBUTION $42.92 OFFICE REPAIRS 141589 A-PLUS SYSTEMS 55.614.88 NOTICES&ADS 141590 ACIRAPPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $1.593.89 COMMUNICATION PARTS 14101 ABC LABORATORIES 52.115.00 LAB SUPPLIES 141592 ARENS INDUSTRIES,INC. $672.66 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 141NG ARIZONA INSTRUMENT $439.74 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 1415M ARMOR-VAC $300.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICE 141595 ASSOCIATED LABORATORIES 3400.00 LAB SERVICES 1415M ATKINOONES COMPUTER SERVICE $321.30 SERVICEAGREEMENT 14107 AVNET COMPUTER $7.738.73 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 141598 BKK LANDFILL $8,062.05 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10.381 MISS BRW SAFETY SUPPLY $1,453.0 SAFETYSUPPLIES 141866 BANANA BLUEPRINT $4,511.31 PRINTINGMQA. I0.W 141WI BATTERY SPECIALTIES 5284.46 BATTERIES 141M BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $6,355,57 LAB SUPPLIES 141603 BEACON SAY ENTERPRISES,INC. 5159.90 TRUCK WASH TICKETS 141604 BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS $60.61 LAB EQUIPMENT 141605 BELL SECURITY $1.384.70 SECURITY SERVICES 141608 BIO-RAD LABORATORIES $124.01 LAB SUPPLIES 141W7 BIOSAFETY SYSTEMS,INC. $110.45 LAB SUPPLIES 141608 810 VENTURES,INC. Slum LAB SUPPLIES 141609 BLASIUS ELECTRIC TRUCK,INC. $262.61 TRUCK PARTS 141610 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $14,051.64 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-7-1 141611 BRENNERFIEDLER&ASSOC.INC. $287.0 COMPRESSOR PARTS 141612 BUDGET JANITORIAL $3,51&00 JANITORIAL SERVICES 141613 BNI BOOKS 5340.56 TECHNICALMANUALS 141614 THE BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFFAIRS $388.98 SUBSCRIPTION 141015 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. 5363.20 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 141016 BUSH&ASSOCIATES,INC. SE172.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6.8.94 141617 BUY-CHEM DISTRIBUTORS $4.070.20 JANITORIAL SERVICES 141618 CEM CORPORATION $966.28 LAB SUPPLIES 141619 CH2M HILL $22.79&n ENGINEERING SERVICES J-31 141620 C.L.TECHNOLOGY $720.00 GASANALYSISSERVICES 141821 CMI E1,869.25 INSTRUMENTPARTS 1416V CABLES TO GO $330.14 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 141623 CALTROL,INC. 1` $788.95 INSTRUMENT FUNDNO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 11Q2N4 PAGE2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID I I/30190 POSTING DATE 11/3094 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 141M4 JOHN CAMLLO ENGINEERS 72,196.40 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-34 141625 CASHCO 8345.21 VALVE PARTS 141MS CENTURY SAFETY INST.B SUPPLY $2.137.39 SAFETY SUPPLIES 141627 CERFNET $120.21 COMPUTER SERVICES 141628 CLARITY ELECTRONICS LTD 83,410.00 VIDEO EQUIPMENT 141629 COMPUSA INC. 946.62 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 1415W CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST 67115.11 ELECTRIC PARTS 14101 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC. 6475.14 TOOLS 14102 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL OO. $2,602.16 CHLORINE MO.10.11.93 14103 CONTROLOO $129.02 ELECTRIC PARTS 141634 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS O C E12,666.38 CONSULTING SERVICES M.O.8.11-93 141MS COOPER INDUSTRIES.INC. 91,992.81 ENGINE PARTS 1416M COOPER INDUSTRIES AND ATTY $2,860.40 J.19-2 CLAIM FEES 14107 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $1,155.71 ELECTRIC PARTS 10638 CHARLES P.CROWLEY CO. 81,68315 INSTRUMENT PARTS 141639 OFFICE OF SELF4N5 PLANS 9355.64 FEES 141640 DME,INC. $2.148.00 ENGINE PARTS 141"1 J.W.OANGELO CO.,INC. $5,947.69 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 141N2 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIF. $38.614.74 DENTAL INSURANCE PLAN 141643 DIETERICH-POST CO. $184.04 INSTRUMENT PARTS 141W DIGITAL EOUIPMENT CORP. $26.671.74 TRAINING REGISTRATIOWSERV.AGREE. 141645 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. 5255.12 PAINT SUPPLIES 141646 EGA(ENGINEERING DESIGN AUTO) $1.531.18 SERVICE AGREEMENT 141647 ESP NORTH 6201.49 FITTINGS 141M EASTMAN,INC. $4.727.28 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1411A9 ECOANALYSIS,INC. $2,295.00 CONSULTING SERVICES 14HIN EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT SPEC 67,OW.W TRAINING REGISTRATION 141651 ENCHANTER,INC. 85,040.W OCEAN MONITORING M.O6-10.92 141652 ED ENGLAND INSTRUMENTS $840.86 HARDWARE 14160 ENVIRONMENTAL PROD.USA 62,067.72 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 1416M ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $750.50 LAB SERVICES 141655 EXIDE ELECTRONICS 86,295.W BATTERIES 14150 FLUID TECH.SALES 62,005.03 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 14107 FST SAND AND GRAVEL,INC. BBW.82 ROAD BASE MATERIALS 141650 MARSHALL FAIRRES $78.08 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 141659 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $12,652]8 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MA.I M-91 141M FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. 6858.57 AIR FREIGHT 141601 FILTERSUPPLYCO. $252.44 MECHANICAL PARTS 14lW2 FIRSTCHOICE $1.463.00 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT 141NS FIRST COMPANY $156.41 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 141M FISCHER S PORTER CO. $1,206.55 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 141NS FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. E73B.85 LABSUPPLIES 141M FISIONS INSTRUMENTS 9275.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 141OW FLO-SYSTEMS 619,255.14 MECHANICAL PARTS 141WS CLIFFORD A.FORKERT $7W.W SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6894 141659 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $15.062.16 WATER USE FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 11R7J94 PAGE3 REPORTNUMBERAP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAB4S PAID 11T80104 POSTING DATE 1 U30194 WARRANT NO, VENDOR AMOUNT 141670 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT 51,148.02 PAINTSUPPUES 141571 FREEDOM IMAGING E132.56 SERVICE AGREEMENT 141672 WT.INC. $5.689.89 COMPUTERPARTS 141070 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $910.31 ELECTRIC PARTS 141674 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. E3,480.70 TELEPHONE SERVICES 141675 GIERLICHAKTCHELL,INC. $296.15 PUMP PARTS 141878 GOLDEN COAST SAWDUST PROD. 5648.50 SAWDUST 1416" GOVERNMENT INSTITUTES,INC. E310.00 BOOKS 14167E DGA CONSULTANTS E12,354.W SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.1b94 1416M DAVID R.GRIFFIN $119,055.01 LEGAL SERVICES-TECHITE PIPE M.O.9-14-94 141680 HACH COMPANY $79.01 LAB SUPPLIES 141MI HARBOUR ENGINEERING 515.916.93 PUMP PARTS 141682 FREDA HARPER EI.m.W DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 141SB3 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC 52720.21 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 141W HAULAWAYCONTAINERS E1,925.W CONTAINER RENTALS 141685 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $031.12 PAINT SUPPUES 141686 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $5.353.25 SLATER AVE.PUMP STN.MCOIF. 141687 ORANGE COUNTY FED.CREDIT UNION $BBO.W DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 1416M I D P $1,607.85 OFFICE SUPPLIES 141689 IMO INDUSTRIES $115.49 INSTRUMENT PARTS 1416M IPCO SAFETY C/O PACIFIC SAFETY E608.63 SAFETY SUPPLIES 141691 [BCD.INC. E34B.92 INSTRUMENT PARTS 141692 IMPERIALWESTCHEMICAL E76,20.77 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11-18-92 14160 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $767.73 CONNECTORS 141694 JAMISON ENGINEERING $3.470.20 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 141695 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY, 52,628.W JANRORIALSUPPUES 141696 JAYS CATERING E357.54 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE 141697 JONES INDUSTRIAL HAROWARE CO. $53.19 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 14108 THE KEITH COMPANIES $3,424.43 ENGINEERING SERVICES 3-38R 14160 KELLY PAPER E153.88 PRINTING 1417W KIMMERLE BROS.INC. $525.95 MECHANICAL PARTS 141701 KING BEARING.INC. 53,356.27 MACHINESUPPLIES 1417M KNOW INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES E055.W TOOLS 141M L A CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $1,185.98 SERVICE AGREEMENT 141M LA M017E CHEMICAL PRODUCTS $52.69 CHEMICALS 141705 K.P.LINDSTROM,INC. $3,10.10 CONSULTING SERVICES-ENVIR.M.O.12-9-90 M1706 SOHO-LYNCH CORP. E1,04974 JANITORIAL SERVICES 14170? MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS,INC. $3,261.01 MECHANICALSUPPLIES 141708 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. E2,100.W CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 141M MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. E493,102.00 CONSTRUCTION P242-2 141710 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $331.42 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 141711 MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. $3,05265 INSTRUMENT 141712 MICROBIAL INSIGHTS,INC. $8333D CONSULTING SERVICES M.O.11-18.92 141713 MIDWAY MFG.B MACHINING $12.316.83 PUMPS 141714 MISSION INDUSTRIES 55,242,56 UNIFORM RENTALS 141716 MTTCHEULINSTRUMENTCO. $757W INSTRUMENT PARTS FUND NO 9199 - IT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 1la2 PAGE4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 1UMI4 POSTING DATE 11KID&I WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 141716 MITCHELL INTERNATIONAL,INC. $150.55 TECHNICAL MANUAL 141717 MONITOR LABS $2.6DS48 INSTRUMENTS 14171E MOODYS INVESTORS SERVICE $3,500.00 QUARTERLY FINANCIAL ANALYSIS 141719 MORTON SALT 5484.58 SALT 141720 NUSTRAININGCORP. 5453.63 SAFETY TRAINING VIDEO 141721 NATIONAL BID SCIENCES $2,734.00 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 141722 NATIONAL RENTA FENCE CO. $257.18 CONSTRUCTION FENCING 141723 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES,INC. 51,202.50 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 141724 MEAL SUPPLY CO. $2.788.19 PLUMBINGSUPPLIES 141725 NEUTRON 57,102.44 CHEMICALS 141M NEWARK ELECTRONICS $738.34 ELECTRIC PARTS 141127 NORTHWESTERN CARBON S2,T79.10 CHEMICALS 14172E OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $146.74 SAFETY GLASSES 141729 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $341.19 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 141730 ORANGE COURIER $163,66 COURIER SERVICES 141731 ORANGE VALVE 9 FITTING CO. SS,218.W FITTINGS 1417U OXYGEN SERVICE 52.230.89 SPECIALTY BASES 141733 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT S7,807.31 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP 1417U PGC SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION $92.71 LAB SUPPLIES 141735 PARASITOLOGY RESEARCH LABS $who LAB SUPPLIES 1417M PSI 5469.10 HARDWARE 141737 PACIFIC PARTS $659.47 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS 141"8 PACIFIC PROCESS EQUIPMENT,INC. $10,808.72 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 141739 PACIFIC BELL $165.26 TELEPHONE SERVICES 141740 PADGETT-THOMPSON $145.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 141741 PAINE WEBBER $28,853.44 REMARKETING AGREEMENT 141742 PAK WEST $131.55 OFFICE SUPPLIES 141743 PASCAL B LUDWIG,INC. $432,408.32 CONSTRUCTION PI.3&2 1417" PASCAL S LUDWIO $39,582.00 CONSTRUCTIONPI43-1 141745 KPMG PEAT MARWICK CPA $9.560.00 AUDITING SERVICES M.O.&11.94 141746 PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION $1.817.75 LAB SUPPLIES 141747 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $134,857.69 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.54-91 141748 RHONE POULENE 542,416.16 ANIONIC POLYMER M.0.&11-92 141749 POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO. 5702.13 ELECTRICSUPPLIES 1417W HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE S109D0 ICE 141751 PULSAFEEDER $2.799.10 PUMP PARTS 1417U RM CONTROLS $129.07 INSTRUMENT PARTS 141753 RB R INSTRUMENTS $4.891.72 ELECTRIC PARTS 141764 REMEDY TEMP $1,508.80 TEMPORARY PERSONNEL SERVICES 141755 MC.IUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY San T8 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 141766 RENOLD,INC. $00.82 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 141757 SCR $399.61 HARDWARE 1417M SOR,INC. $870,91 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 141759 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS $379.78 ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIR 1417M SAWA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $291.0 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 141761 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTL $262.517,19 OCEAN MONITORING M.OSe N FUNDNO SIN - IT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 11!lN84 PAGES REPOU NUMBERM43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 11/30W POSTING DATE 11130IN WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 141752 SCOTTSPECIALTY GASES.INC. 5568.18 SPECIALTY GASES 141763 SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS,INC. $82.00 LAB SUPPLIES 1417U SHAMROCK SUPPLY SUBS0 SAFETY SUPPLIES 141785 SHURELUCK SALES $10MIAS TOOLSHARDWARE 141M SO-CAL AIRGAS 52,934.57 WELDING EQUIPMENT 141767 SOUTH COAST WATER $38.24 LAB SUPPLIES 141768 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO. $1.911.12 POWER 141769 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. $35.621.15 POWER 141770 $O.CAL.GAS.CO. $108,246.79 NATURAL GAS 141771 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. $1.715.00 DIESEWNLEADED FUEL 141772 SOUVENIR PHOTO S36.98 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 14In3 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER 52,594.09 DRINKING WATERICOOLER RENTALS 141774 SPEK INDUSTRIES,INC. 5765.49 LAB SUPPLIES 141775 STANDARD&POORE CORP. E2.500.00 COP PROGRAM ANALYTICAL SERVICES 141776 STATE STREET BANK $13,X&N TRUSTEE SERVICES M.O.7-"2 141M GARY G.STREED 54.102.45 REIMS.PETTY CASH,TRAINING&TRAVEL 141776 SUMMIT STEEL $88,120 METAL 141779 TALENT TREE PERSONNEL SERVICES $841.00 TEMPORARY PERSONNEL SERVICES 141780 TECHNOMIC PUBLISHING CO.,INC. $219.81 PUBLICATION 141781 TEKTRONIX,INC. $3VIA8 LAB SUPPLIES 141782 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $1,463.10 MECHANICAL PARTS 14170 THORPE INSULATION $225.23 PIPING 141784 TONYS LOCK&SAFE SERVICE 5144.19 LOCKS&KEYS 141765 TORNELL&GOTTEN $692.60 DEPOSITIONS-PERSONNEL MATTERS 1417H MANE $25MAII ELECTRIC SUPPLIES M1787 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES $1,147.00 TRAVEL SERVICES M.O1 94 141788 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $SWS2 TRUCK PARTS 14170 TRUESDAIL LABS $264.00 LAB SERVICES 141790 JO TUCKER&SON.INC. WSN6.14 INSTRUMENTM.O.9-144N 141791 TUSTIN DODGE $13.10 TRUCK PARTS 141792 TWINING LABORATORIES $3.285.00 SOIL TESTING M.0.7-1&94 141793 U.S.AUTO GLASS CENTERS $70.31 TRUCK PARTS 141794 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $681119 PARCEL SERVICES 141795 VWR SCIENTIFIC $1,150.82 LAB SUPPLIES 141796 VALIN CORPORATION $896.57 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 141797 VALLEY CRIES SUPPLY CO. $9511" PLUMBING SUPPLIES 141798 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS $425.70 LAB SUPPLIES 1417" VERTEX SYSTEMS $1.972.00 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT 1418M VILLAGE NURSERIES $107.61 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 141801 WATER ENVIRONMENT FED. $910.00 REGISTRATION 1418M WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $31.572.51 CAUSTIC SODA&HYPOCHLORIDE M.O.&12-92&4-13.94 141803 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $474.64 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 141804 WESCO $450.00 INSTRUMENTSUPPLIES 1418M WITEG $662.13 LAB SUPPLIES 141008 ROURKE,WOODRUFF&SPRADLIN $45,665.31 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.2-1&92 141807 WOOD HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INST. 69m..00 TRAINING REGISTRATION FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 11RN94 PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 11/30194 POSTING OATE 11/JOR4 WARRANT NO. VENDOR 141808 XEROX CORP. 68,374.91 COPIER LEASES 141809 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $787.64 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 141810 YARDLEY INSTRUMENTS $448.94 CHART PAPER 141811 JOHNSON YOKOGAWA CORP. 577.41 INS7RUMENTSUPPLIES 141812 RICHARD YOUNG PRODUCTS $73,00 INSTRUMENT PARTS 141613 ZYMARK CORP. 81,459.82 LAB EQUIPMENT 141814 RICHARD B.EDOAR $200.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 1 IM0 S3,643,695.91 SUMMARY AMOUNT 01 OPER FUND 5,191.38 02 OPER FUND 13.749.43 02 CAP FAD FUND 7,565.83 03OPER FUND 32.109.58 03 CAP FAC FUND 128.375.50 05OPER FUND 4,977.24 05 CAP FAC FUND 712.00 06 OPER FUND 278.63 07 OPEN FUND 1.452.14 07 CAP FAC FUND 14,57L84 011 OPER FUND 10.051.41 011 CAP FAC FUND 5,933.25 014 OPER FUND 5416.00 014 CAP FAC FUND 17.297,65 07914 OPER FUND 14.59 Jf OPER FUND 1.005.690.70 CORE 2,204,328.59 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND 19.912.26 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL 171.W8.12 3,843,695.91 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING AGENDA DECEMBER 14, 1994 Agenda Item (9)(a): Consideration of motion approving Amendment No. 1 to Specific Term Employment Agreement with John B. Falkenstein Summary In December 1992, the Directors approved a Specific Tenn Employment Agreement with John B. Falkenstein to assist the Construction Management Division of the Engineering Department with contract administration. Staff has indicated that Mr. Falkenstein has performed very well and has requested that his agreement be extended through December 1995 at the rate of $45.00 per hour, an increase of$2.50 per hour. Staff Recommendation Approve Amendment No. 1 to the Specific Term Employment Agreement with John B. Falkenstein, extending the term to December 31, 1995 and providing for an increase in the hourly rate to an amount not to exceed $45.00 per hour. -a RESOLUTION NO. 94-145 `..� APPROVING AMENDMENT NO 1 TO THE SPECIFIC TERM EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT WITH JOHN B. FALKENSTEIN, PE A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1,2, 3, 5,6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE SPECIFIC TERM EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT WITH JOHN B. FALKENSTEIN, PE FOR SPECIALIZED ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES REQUIRED FOR VARIOUS MASTER-PLANNED CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore entered into a Specific Term Employment Agreement with John B. Falkenstein, PE for specialized engineering and construction management services required for various master-planned construction projects; and, WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to amend said agreement to provide an extension to the agreement for one additional year for needed additional specialized engineering and construction management services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,2, 3, 5,6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Amendment No. 1 to the Specific Term Employment Agreement dated December 9, 1992,with John B. Falkenstein, PE for specialized engineering and construction management services required for various master-planned construction projects, providing for extension of the agreement for one additional year for needed additional specialized engineering and construction management services, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That payment for said services is hereby authorized in accordance with the provisions set forth in said agreement, on an as-needed basis, for a one-year period beginning January 1, 1995, at the hourly rate of$45.00; and, Section 3: That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Amendment No. 1 in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held December 14, 1994. �/ RPDN I. JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING AGENDA DECEMBER 14, 1994 Agenda Item (9)(b): Consideration of motion to receive and file Summons and Complaint for Wrongful Death and Negligence, Andy C. Patterson; Jackie J. Venezio; Lacey Miller, a minor, by and through her Guardian Ad Litem, Georgianne I. Miller, Dorothy M. R. Holm and as Executrix of the Estate of Richard L. Holm, vs. City of Huntington Beach, at al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 738179, in connection with construction of Miscellaneous Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. 122-49, and ratifying delegated action of the Executive Committee authorizing employment of Chase, Rotchford, Drukker& Bogust as special counsel to appear and defend the interests of the Districts. Summary See attached memorandum dated November 30, 1994 from General Counsel. Recommendation Staff recommends to receive and file Summons and Complaint for Wrongful Death and Negligence; and ratifying delegated action of the Executive Committee authorizing employment of Chase, Rotchford, Drukker& Bogust as special counsel to appear and defend the interests of the Districts. wptl«Wsleae4n2-09b JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING AGENDA DECEMBER 14, 1994 Agenda Item (9)(C): consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim of Jane Kaye receive November 14, 1994, in an unknown amount for alleged damages, and refer to the Districts' General Counsel and liability claims administrator for appropriate action. Summary See attached memorandum dated December 7, 1994 from General Counsel. Recommendation Staff recommends to receive, file and deny claim of Jane Kaye, and refer to Districts' General Counsel and liability claims administrator for appropriate action. wpaxwsaea<na.ax JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING AGENDA DECEMBER 14, 1994 Agenda Item (9)(d): Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny amended claim of Louis Sangermano dated October 16, 1994, in an estimated amount to be more than $500,000.00 for alleged damages, and refer to the Districts' General Counsel, Special Counsel and liability claims administrator for appropriate action. Summary See attached memorandum dated November 15, 1994 from General Counsel. .► Recommendation Staff recommends to receive, file and deny amended claim of Louis Sangennano, and refer to Districts' General Counsel, Special Counsel and liability claims administrator for appropriate action. L:7-10:112-0se JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING AGENDA DECEMBER 14, 1994 DISTRICTS 1 & 2 Agenda Item (9)(e): Ratify Staff Action and Issue Purchase Order in the amount of$31,457.52 to Mladen Buntich Construction Company for Emergency Street Repairs to the Memory Lane Interceptor, Contract No. 2-30-R, and Authorize Staff and General Counsel to seek reimbursement from the City of Santa Ana Summary Attached is a Staff Report which describes the work in detail. Staff Recommendation Ratify staff action and issue a purchase order to Mladen Buntich Construction Company, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $31,457.52. Authorize Staff and General Counsel to attempt to recover costs from the City of Santa Ana. VMdwbs1agW12-0k COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS J Ai ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA IOSAA ELLIS AVENUE November 16, 1994 RO 80.8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92728.8127 P141982 RAI I STAFF REPORT Ratify Staff Action for Emergency Street Repairs re Memory Lane Interceptor, Contract No. 2-30 Summary In June 1994, staff was advised by the City of Santa Ana that a severe subsidence in the asphalt roadway in Memory Lane over the Memory Lane Interceptor, just east of Lowell Lane had occurred. The Districts responded immediately by obtaining the service of the contractor who had made the initial installation. The repairs were deemed to be of an emergency nature and completed pursuant to staffs authority under the emergency provisions of the purchasing resolution. As the repair proceeded, the extent of the work continued to increase. In fact, during the repair operations, District's personnel learned from the locals that the City of Santa Ana had suffered a major water main break in the adjacent area and had also performed extensive repairs to the street. Staff believes that the damages repaired by the Districts were the result of the water main break and had subsequently submitted a claim to the City to recover all costs. The final costs have now been determined and the recommendation is to ratify staff action and issue a purchase order to Mladen Buntich Construction Company, Inc. in the amount of $31,457.52. Staff and Counsel will attempt recovery of these funds from the City of Santa Ana. Staff Recommendation Ratify staff action and issue a purchase order to Mladen Buntich Construction Company, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $31,457.52. Authorize Staff and General Counsel to attempt to recover costs from the City of Santa Ana. YIpdmI,EngWgrrpls%rf 2-94.04 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING AGENDA DECEMBER 14, 1994 DISTRICT 3 Agenda Item (9)(f): Authorize Selection committee to negotiate Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with DGA Consultants, Inc. re Rehabilitation of Magnolia Trunk Sewer, Orangethorpe Avenue to Ellis Avenue, Contract No. 3-35R, and Seal Beach Boulevard Interceptor Sewer Manhole Rehabilitation, between Westminster Boulevard and 405 Freeway, Contract No. 3-11R Summary Attached is Staff Report which details the project and the proposed changes to the Scope of Work. Staff Recommendation Authorization for the Selection Committee to negotiate Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with DGA Consultants, Inc. for Contracts Nos. 3-35R and 3-11 R. Following the Selection Committee's negotiations, the proposed addendum will be presented to the District 3 Directors for consideration. woaoo��eauz-0sr COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA P November 15, 1994 0PO BOXELLI 9127AVENUE vfl.Cox BORN FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728 fiR) p 141962.241122A11 STAFF REPORT Proposed Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with DGA Consultants re Rehabilitation of Magnolia Relief Trunk and Rehabilitation of Magnolia Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-35R and Seal Beach Boulevard Interceptor Sewer Manhole Rehabilitation, Contract No. 3-11R Summary The Magnolia Trunk Sewer, located between Orangethorpe Avenue and Ellis Avenue in Magnolia Street and Bushard Street, was constructed circa 1951, under the jurisdiction of the Joint Outfall Sewer Organization, the predecessor authority to the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. The sewer line consists of approximately 19,000 feet of 39-inch VCP pipe and 44,000 feet of reinforced concrete pipe, ranging in size from 39 to 76 inches. The original construction contract included 64 manholes. Since that time, six additional manholes have been constructed under separate contracts. Staff has investigated the condition of this sewer by videotaping the entire Magnolia Trunk Sewer between Orangethorpe and Ellis Avenues and conducting a comprehensive manhole survey. Staff has found that the 40-year old manholes are deteriorated and in need of repair. Staff also surveyed the condition of nine manholes along the Seal Beach Boulevard Interceptor between the Seal Beach Pump Station, located at Seal Beach Boulevard and Westminster Boulevard and the 405 Freeway, and found these manholes also in need of repair. In February 1992, the Directors approved a Professional Services Agreement with DGA Consultants, Inc. for preparation of plans and specifications for the above rehabilitation work. Following the initiation of design for the rehabilitation of manholes, the Maintenance Department requested that the existing shaft- and vault-type manholes be replaced with the current standard of large diameter shaft-type manholes. The large diameter shaft- type manholes allow for easier communication and removal of maintenance employees and more work space for maintenance employees, resulting in a safer work environment. The design consultants agreed to the design revisions at no additional ,,, costs, providing a time extension was granted to make said revisions. This design change will provide added serviceability of the trunk line in the future, but due to the extended time required for potholing utilities around manholes to be replaced and the +�✓ redesign of the project, the estimated start of construction is now the mid-1995. The Districts' 1989 Master Plan identified the Magnolia Trunk Relief for construction in 1998. The Magnolia Trunk Relief is planned as a 30-inch parallel to the Magnolia Trunk Sewer, between Trask Avenue and Westminster Avenue. The Districts' staff recommendation is to omit the rehabilitation work on the Magnolia Trunk Sewer between Trask Avenue and Westminster Avenue and replace the line with a larger sized pipe and include the replacement sewer with the rehabilitation work in one contract. The combination of these projects will reduce administrative costs and public inconvenience. The trunk sewer rehabilitation project will require extensive full-time inspection and there are a large number of other trunk sewer projects scheduled to start construction in 1995. The projected amount of work will require additional inspection staff. Therefore, staff recommends the use of consultant inspectors on a time and materials basis to temporarily supplement the Districts' inspection staff. Contract administration will continue to be provided by Districts' Construction Management Division. Staff Recommendation Authorization for the Selection Committee to negotiate Addendum No. 2 to the professional services agreement with DGA Consultants, Inc. Following the Selection Committee's negotiations, the proposed addendum will be presented to the Directors of District No. 3 for consideration. wpEx�gMgrtpls1D3121 i9C.sr JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING AGENDA DECEMBER 14, 1994 DISTRICT 3 Agenda Item (9)(g): Consideration of motion to receive and file Summons and Complaint for Personal Injury, Property Damage and Negligence, Nguyen Pham and Khanh Hoang vs. County Sanitation District No. 3, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 738710, in connection with an alleged vehicle accident due to an uncovered manhole, and authorize the District's General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the District. Summary See attached memorandum dated December 7, 1994 from General Counsel. Recommendation Staff recommends to receive and file Summons and Complaint for Personal Injury, Property Damage and Negligence, and authorize the District's General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the Districts. JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS v REGULAR MEETING AGENDA DECEMBER 14, 1994 DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Agenda Item (9)(h): Consideration of motion to approve Change Orders Nos. 3 and 4 and the Closeout Agreement re Improvements to Bitter Point and Rocky Point Pump Stations, Contract No. 5-32, and Improvements to Bay Bridge Pump Station, Contract No. 5-33. Summary Attached is a Staff Report that explains the proposed actions in detail. Staff Recommendation Approve Change Order No. 3 for four items of additional work for$2,759.65 and 293 calendar days time extension; Change Order No. 4 for an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a deduction of$6,600.00, increasing the total amount of change orders on this contract to $33,664.65, and increasing the original contract amount of$1,765,757.00 to $1,799,421.65; and consideration of the resolution authorizing acceptance of the work as complete, execution of the final Closeout Agreement, and file the Notice of Completion as required. »vaa�masanz-0sn COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 41 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA +o November 16, 1994 PO B Box s 127 FOUNTAIN VPLLEv,CALIFORNIAOBN 92)28-812) (7141982 2411 STAFF REPORT DISTRICTS 5 AND 6 APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 AND 4 TO IMPROVEMENTS TO BITTER POINT AND ROCKY POINT PUMP STATIONS CONTRACT NO.5-32 AND IMPROVEMENTS TO BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION CONTRACT NO.5-33 ,AND ACCEPTANCE OF CONTRACT AS COMPLETE. SUMMARY In May 1988,the Directors approved plans and specifications for Improvements to Bitter Point and Rocky Point Pump Stations, Contract No.5-32,and Improvements to Bay Bridge Pump Station,Contract No.5-33, designed by Robert Bein,William Frost and Associates is being constructed by Uhler, Inc. This$1.77 million project within the City of Newport Beach includes the upgrades and improvements to three pumping stations,the Rocky Point,Bitter Point,and Bay Bridge Pump Stations. Improvements consist of new piping, pumps,motors,drives, earthquakes strengthening,and architectural Improvements. Change Order No.3 is a net addition of$2,759.65 to the contract for two items of added work and two items of deleted work and 293 calendar days. (1) Change Order No. 3 Item 1 is an addition of 289 calendar days to the contract for delays contributed to by the Districts' design changes. These changes were due to changes in valves in a valve pit because of an error in elevation,changing the design of two pumps that initially would not have met the hydraulic requirements. The strength of the motor room floor required additional study due to heavier motors being shipped than initially estimated, and the relocation of electrical conduit and ductwork due to the unexpected added height of motors. Item 2,a credit of$2,020.00,reimburses the Contractor for not sending representatives,at the suppliers expense,to witness pumps and motors testing at their factory. However,equipment was factory tested and certified results were obtained before approving the release of the equipment. Item 3,in the amount of$2,936.00 and 2 calendar days,is for relocating rest room facilities to provide adequate space for electrical equipment delivered in sizes whose dimensions were greater than envisioned by the designers. Item 4,in the amount of$1,843.65 and 2 calendar days,is the cost to remove blades from a louvre to reduce air flow resistance from a stand-by generator radiator fan and Fastest a generator. The added work described in Items 3 and 4 would have been included in the original design and bid if discovered or known in the design phase. It adds no costs over and above what would have otherwise occurred had the original drawings included these features. Item 2 is a credit to the Districts. Item 1 is for time extension only with no additional costs to the Districts. The anginal contract amount for this project was$1,756,757.00. This contract is now complete. The amount of change orders to date is$40,264.65 representing a net Increase of 2.30%over the original contract amount. m 6 (2) Chance Order No.4 Change Order No.4 is for the adjustment of engineers quantities for a net deduction of$6,600.00. If the Districts approved these change orders,the total cost of the change orders on this contract will be $33,664.65. This represents an increase of 1.92%over the original contract. (3) Acceptance of Contract as Complete Uhler, Inc. has fulfilled all contractual obligations within the specified and extended time, minus the changes for liquidated damages. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve Change Order No. 3 for four items of additional work for an additional$2,759.65 and 293 calendar days time extension,and Change Order No.4 for an adjustment of engineers quantities for a deduction of $6,600.00;increasing the total amount of change orders on this contract to$33,664.65,and increasing the original contract amount of$1,765,757.00 to$1,799,421.65;and consideration of the resolution authorizing acceptance of the work as complete,execution of the final Closeout Agreement,and file the Notice of Completion as required. en&ommi1t6sr12-94.03 > Page 1 of 5 `...� COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 108" ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Uhler, Inc. C.O. No.: Three (3) Date: December 14, 1994 Job: Improvements to Bitter Point and Rocky Point Pump Stations, Contract No. 5-32, and Improvements to Bay Bridge Pump Station, Contract No. 5-33 Consultant: Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates Amount of this Change Order (Add)(Deduet) $ 2,759.65 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 -TIME EXTENSION Pursuant to the contract documents, the Contractor is entitled to be granted time extensions to the contract for delays that have been contributed to on the part of the �+ Districts. The reasons for delays are as follows with the recommended time extension. 1. Due to an error in elevation of the valve vault located outside the pump station and as shown on the contract days, the Districts had to determine the type of valves to install in order to resolve an interference problem with the valve vault cover. The original design of valves was utilized. Delay period: August 19, 1993 through October 20, 1993. Time Extension This Item: 63 Calendar Days 2. The specifications required a Goulds pump, Model 12 ECD with a 50 hp 720 rpm motor. It was discussed that the specification pump and motor did not meet the actual hydraulic conditions. After a series of submittals and meetings, a redesign was made to Goulds pump 12 x 14 ECD with a 50 hp 720 rpm motor. Delay period: November 3, 1992 through May 6, 1993. Time Extension This Item: 185 Calendar Days 3. The installation of the 250 hp motor was delayed to evaluate the strength of the existing concrete floor because the final shipping weight of the motor was much greater than had been estimated by the designer. Delay period: February 24, 1994 through March 3, 1994. Time Extension This Item: 8 Calendar Days Page 2 of 5 ' COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY �l 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Uhler, Inc. C.O. No.: Three (3) Date: December 14, 1994 Job: Improvements to Bitter Point and Rocky Point Pump Stations, Contract No. 5-32, and Improvements to Bay Bridge Pump Station, Contract No. 5-33 Consultant: Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates 4. The two new 250 HP motors were much larger in physical dimensions as previously described. Due to an unforeseen increase in height, the motors could not be placed in position due to an interference with several electrical conduits and an air duct. Contractor was delayed until the problem was resolved and the interference was removed. (Reference Change Order No. 2, dated June 8, 1994 for costs). Time Extension This Item: 33 Calendar Days ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $0.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 289 Calendar Days ITEM 2 - WITNESS TESTING OF PUMPS AND MOTORS The contract requires that the supplier shall provide any cost required to travel to the pump witness test for a Districts' representative including airfare, hotel and accommodations. The Districts elected not to send any representatives to witness the tests but required the submittal of certified test results instead. This item was negotiated in accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6(B)(2)(a). CREDIT COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ($2,020.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 3 of 5 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 108" ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Uhler, Inc. C.O. No.: Three (3) Dante: December 14, 1994 Job: Improvements to Bitter Point and Rocky Point Pump Stations. Contract No. 5-32, and Improvements to Bay Bridge Pump Station, Contract No. 5-33 Consultant: Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates ITEM 3 - RELOCATION OF RESTROOM FACILITIES After the delivery of the new additional electrical equipment for the Bay Bridge Pump Station, it became apparent that the equipment was larger in dimension than had been envisioned on the design drawings. Therefore, the existing water closet and sink were relocated to provide an additional six feet of space for the motor control center, VFDs (variable frequency drives), and electrical switchgear. The Contractor performed the work on a negotiated basis pursuant to Section 10-6(B)(2)(a) of the General Provisions. �✓ ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $2,936.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 2 Calendar Days ITEM 4 - MODIFICATION OF LOUVERS The 10'-0 x 8'-0 louvers located in the north wall of the Generator Room provided too much air resistance to the radiator fan of the stand-by generator, thereby causing the generator engines to operate at a higher than normal temperature. The Contractor was directed to remove every other louver thereby reducing the resistance to air Flow and the generator was retested. Work was performed on a force account basis in accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6(B)(2)(b), ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $1,843.65 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER 2 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $2,759.65 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 293 Calendar Days Page 4 of 5 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Uhler, Inc. C.O. No.: Three (3) Date: December 14, 1994 Job: Improvements to Bitter Point and Rocky Point Pump Stations, Contract No. 5-32, and Improvements to Bay Bridge Pump Station, Contract No. 5-33 Consultant: Robert Ben, William Frost and Associates The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 293 days extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approve by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME V Original Contract Date: November 3, 1992 Original Contract Time: 365 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: November 2, 1993 Time Extension this C.O.: 293 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 658 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 658 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: August 22, 1994 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 1,765,757.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 37,505.00 This Change (Add)(DedUet) $ 2,759.65 Amended Contract Price $ 1 ,806,021.65 Page 5 of 5 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Uhler, Inc. C.O. No.: Three (3) Date: December 14. 1994 Job: Improvements to Bitter Point and Rocky Point Pumo Stations, Contract No. 5-32, and Improvements to Bay Bridge Pump Station, Contract No. 5-33 Consultant: Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates Board Authorization Date: December 14, 1994 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Submitted / Re mende `► engineering Manager Date Construction Ma ger Date Ap vedd Eby: Approved as to Form: D rector of Engineering Date General Counsel Date Accepted by: UHLER, INC. Co tractor Date Page 1 of 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Uhler, Inc. C.O. No.: Four (4) Date: December 14, 1994 Job: Improvements to Bitter Point and Rocky Point Pump Stations, Contract No. 5-32, and Improvements to Bay Bridge Pumo Station, Contract No. 5-33 Consultant: Robert Bein. William Frost and Associates Amount of this Change Order (Add)(Deduct) $ (6,600.00) In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 -ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S QUANTITIES ADD: Change In Quantity Item No. Unit Descn ion From To Difference Unit Pnce Total Subtotal: $ 0.00 DEDUCT: Change In Quantity Item No. Unit Description From To Difference Unit Poce Total 19 C.V. Crushed Rock, 100.00 0.00 100.00 $20.0xC.V. $2,1300.00 0"to12'depth 20 C.Y. Crushed Ruck, 100.00 am MOD $22.0D/C.Y. $2,200.00 12'to 24'depth 21 G.V. Crushed Rock, 100.00 am MOD $24.00.C.V. $2,400D0 24r to 36 depth Subtotal: $(6,600.00) CREDIT COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ($6,600.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: ($6,600.00) TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days Page 2 of 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Uhler, Inc. C.O. No.: Four (4) Date: December 14, 1994 Job: Improvements to Bitter Point and Rocky Point Pump Stations, Contract No. 5-32, and Improvements to Bay Bridge Pump Station, Contract No. 5-33 Consultant: Robert Bein. William Frost and Associates The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME .J Original Contract Date: November 3, 1992 Original Contract Time: 365 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: November 2, 1993 Time Extension this C.O.: 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 293 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 658 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: August 22, 1994 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 1,765,757.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 40,264.65 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ (6,600.00) Amended Contract Price $ 1 ,799,421.65 Page 3 of 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Uhler, Inc. C.O. No.: Four (4) Date: December14, 1994 Job: Improvements to Bitter Point and Rocky Point Pump Stations, Contract No. 5-32, and Improvements to Bay Bridge Pump Station, Contract No. 5-33 Consultant: Robert Bein. William Frost and Associates Board Authorization Date: December 14, 1994 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA /Submitted by: m ended ngineering Manager Date Construction M!q er Date Aprved by: Approved as tg,Form: rector of Engineering Date Gerwal Coulhsel Date Accepted by: UHLER, INC. Contractor Date ` RESOLUTION NO. 94-153 ACCEPTING CONTRACT NOS. 5-32 AND 5-33 AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 5 AND 6 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING IMPROVEMENTS TO BITTER POINT AND ROCKY POINT PUMP STATIONS, CONTRACT NO. 532 AND IMPROVEMENTS TO BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION, CONTRACT NO. 5-33, AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT .................«....«»«..... The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 5 and 6 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, Uhler, Inc., has completed the construction in accordance voth the terms of the contract for Improvements to Bitter Point and Rocky Point Pump Stations, Contract No. 5-32 and Improvements to Bay Bridge Pump Station, Contract No. 5-33, on September 13, 1994; and, Section 2. That by letter the Districts' Director of Engineering has recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That Improvements to Bitter Point and Rocky Point Pump Stations, Contract No. 5-32 and Improvements to Bay Bridge Pump Station, Contract No. 5-33, are hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated November 3, 1992; and, Section 4. That the Districts' Director of Engineering is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor, and, Section 5. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Uhler, Inc., setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Improvements to Bitter Point and Rocky Point Pump Stations, Contract No. 5.32 and Improvements to Bay Bridge Pump Station, Contract No. 5.33, is hereby approved and accepted in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 6. That the Chair and Secretary of District No. 5 acting for itself and on behalf of District No. 6, is hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the Districts. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held December 14, 1994. `/ RMAO.153 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING AGENDA DECEMBER 14, 1994 DISTRICT 7 Agenda Item (9)(1): Consideration of motion ratifying action of staff issuing a Purchase Order to Mladen Buntich Construction Company, Inc. for Emergency Repairs to the Red Hill Interceptor, Contract No. 7-6d-R, in the total amount of$43,482.22. Summary Attached is a Staff Report that provides more details re the action. Staff Recommendation Ratify staff action and approve issuance of a purchase order in the amount of$43,482.22 to Mladen Buntich Construction Company, Inc., for Emergency Repairs to the Red Hill Interceptor, Contract No. 7-6-4-R. U wpd=m ma94112� COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS Y W ORANGE COUN", CALIFORNIA iow 2L118 November 22, 1994 PO 8DX 0127 ippMGIN VALLEY.GLIfOXNN 827289127 �J 9+n8 -2a11 STAFF REPORT Ratifying Staff Action re Issuance of Purchase Order to Mladen Buntich Construction Company, Inc. For Emergency Repairs to Red Hill Interceptor, Contract No. 7-6-4. Summary In August 1994, Staff was advised by the City of Tustin that a subsidence had occurred in the asphalt roadway on Red Hill Avenue over the Red Hill Interceptor, at the Warner Avenue intersection. The City of Tustin had responded first at the discovery of the subsidence to ascertain the damage, determine cause and responsibility and set-up traffic control for the public safety. After determining that there was a break in the sewer line and so being notified by the City, Staff proceeded immediately with emergency repairs to the line. The cause of the subsidence was indeed caused by a break in the 14-inch ACP (Asbestos Cement Pipe), a lateral that was built in 1972 from the Tustin United States Marine Base. The repair began of August 18, 1994 and completed by August 25, 1994, six days after beginning work. Work had to be performed on a round-the-clock basis in order to minimize the impact on the public and get the sewer back into an unrestricted service. Mladen Buntich Construction Company, Inc. was working on the new Baker-Gisler Interceptor project at the time of the emergency and thus was in a position to respond with available labor and equipment. Staff Recommendation The final costs have now been determined and the recommendation is to ratify staff action and issue a purchase order to Mladen Buntich Construction Company, Inc. in the amount of$43,482.22. j:\wpdwc ngMg�lsl 29 .13 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS MEETING AGENDAFOR DECEMBER 14, 1994 DISTRICT 7 Agenda Item (9)0): Receive, file and initiate Annexation No. 143-- Eckard Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7 Summary The District has received a request from Mr. Frank Eckard to annex 0.585 acres. This territory is in the vicinity north of the intersection of Lemon Heights Drive and Foothill Boulevard in the Lemon Heights area of unincorporated County area. This area has about 121 acres left for annexation to the District. The property is currently inhabited with one single-family dwelling. The local sewering agency is County Sanitation District No. 7. v.r This annexation is in accordance with the terms of the negotiated agreement with the County of Orange RE A.B. 8, Tax Exchange for Annexing Properties, under which the District no longer receives a percentage of the basic levy and, instead, collects a higher annexation fee. The annexation fee is $5,143.00. Staff Recommendation Approval of the resolution attached to the agenda material initiating proceedings for Annexation No. 143—Eckard Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7. Ln9A .Item -1- MgrZ.1112-02.94 PETITION FUR ANNEXATION Date: TO: Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. �. P. 0. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 I (We) , the undersigned landcwner(s), do hereby request that proceedings be taken to annex 1.01 acres (Gross - to nearest hundredth) of territory to the District located in the vicinity of LFAVIV -{FIG "-5 (indicate adjacent street intersection or area description) in the city of , wore particularly (indicate city or unincorporated territory) described and shown can the FOAL DESCRIPTION and MAP enclosed herewith which has been prepared in accordance with the District's annexation procedures. The street address of the property is: !I f), d° l lZ 72 U IS i F Il i / 9 G O . The reason for the proposed annexation is: crwrk /on1NFTTIC r✓ Said property is A Inhabited / Uninhabited. Number of registered voters, if any: L. The assessed value of the property is: Also enclosed are the JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL QUESTIONNAIRE required by the local Agency Foraetion Commission (and an Environmental Iagact Report, if appropriate) and a check in the amount of $500.00 representing payment of the DISTRICT PROCESSING FEE. Notices and comummications relative to this proposal for annexation should be sent to the following: R9Nk FC' iisi v n y/ Tele: V6YO Tele• SIGNATURE OF. 'DATE-SIGNED ADDRESS OF IANDCA M FR9Nk K��RI) Name (Typed or dated) x aM9 or printed) RESOLUTION NO. 94-154-7 AUTHORIZING INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS AND FILING OF APPLICATION TO LAFCO RE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO DISTRICT NO. 7 (ANNEXATION NO. 143 - ECKARD ANNEXATION) A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS AND REQUESTING THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION TO TAKE PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION TO THE DISTRICT OF TERRITORY KNOWN AS ANNEXATION NO. 143- ECKARD ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That proceedings are hereby authorized to be initiated by District No. 7, and the Local Agency Formation Commission of Orange County is hereby requested to take proceedings for the annexation of territory designated as "Annexation No. 143- Eckard Annexation to County Sanitation District No. T', the boundaries of which are more particularly described and delineated on Exhibits "A" and"B" attached hereto and by reference made a part of this resolution, according to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth in this resolution in the manner provided by the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985; and, Section 2. That this proposal is made pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, Division 3, commencing with Section 55000 of the California Government Code; and, Section 3. That this application is for the purpose of annexing approximately 0.585 acres of territory to District No. 7 in the vicinity of the intersection of Lemon Heights Drive and Foothill Boulevard in unincorporated county territory,to provide sanitary sewer service to said territory, which said service is not now provided by any public agency, as requested by Frank Eckard, owner of said property; and, Section 4. That the territory to be annexed is uninhabited; and, Section 5. That this proposal is consistent with the adopted sphere of influence of the affected District; and, Section 6. That the proposed Annexation No. 143- Eckard Annexation to District No. 7, shall be subject to the condition that all fees required to be paid to the District must be satisfied prior to completion of the annexation proceedings; and, Section 7. That the District hereby agrees, pursuant to Section 99.1 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, to waive its ad valorem property tax allocation exchange with other affected taxing agencies. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held December 14, 1994. RANI.r50 \r.d r BLOCK MODULE 5853 26 1 � ERHIBZT "A" 2 3 "ANNEXATION NO. 143" TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 J 4 Lots 9 and 10, of Tract No. 694 per map recorded in Book 31, 5 Pages 30 through 32 of Miscellaneous Maps, Records of Orange 6 County, California; together with that certain portion of Lot 11 of 7 said Tract No. 694 as described and shown as Parcel 2 of a grant 8 deed recorded April 10, 1989 as Instrument No. 89-205930, Records 9 of Orange County, California and that certain portion of Lot Y of 10 said Tract No. 694, all in the unincorporated territory of said 11 Orange County, State of California, being more particularly 12 described as follows: 13 Beginning at a point in the existing boundary line of County 14 Sanitation District No. 7 , as established by 'Annexation No. 78 - 15 Tentative Tract No. 9688 and Adjacent Area' to said district, said 18i point being the most Northerly corner of said annexation and being 17 a point on the Northwesterly right of way of Lemon Heights Drive, 18 (shown as Lot Y Southeasterly of said Lots 9, 10 and 11 of said 19 Tract No. 694) , 45.00 feet wide, 20.00 feet Northwesterly measured 20 at right angles from the centerline; thence Southwesterly along 21 said existing boundary line per said annexation, along the 22 Northwesterly right of way of Lemon Heights Drive, S. 600 58 ' 00" 23 W. 86.55 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, being the Southerly 24 25 26 Page 1 of 3 27 28 EXHIBIT "A" ANNEXATION NO. 143 TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 1 2i, corner of said Lot 11 of Tract No. 694; thence continuing along 3 said existing . boundary and said Northwesterly right of 4 way of Lemon Heights Drive, being the southeasterly boundary line i 5 of said Lots 10 and 9 of Tract No. 694 , through the following 6 courses: 7 thence, southwesterly, along a tangent curve concave 8 northwesterly and having a radius of 180. 00 feet, through a 9 central angle of 090 04 ' 50" an arc distance of 28. 53 feet; 10 thence, S. 700 02 ' 50" W. 23.03 feet; thence southwesterly, 11 along a tangent curve concave southeasterly and having a 12 radius of 270.00 feet, through a central angle of 22° 53 ' 40" an arc distance of 107.88 feet; thence, S. 47° 09 ' 10" W. 14 42.95 feet to the most southerly corner of said Lot 9; 15 thence, leaving said existing District Boundary and said right of 18 way line, northwesterly along the southwesterly boundary line of 17 said Lot 9 and its Northwesterly prolongation, N. 330 19 ' 50" W. 18 148 .83 feet to the centerline of Vista Del Lago, a public street, 19 (shown as Lot Y northwesterly of said Lots 9, 10 and 11 on said 20 recorded map of Tract No. 694) , being 20 feet on either side of 21 said centerline; thence northeasterly along said centerline of said 22 Vista Del Lago, N. 560 40' 10" E. 207.50 feet; thence leaving said 23 existing centerline of Vista Del Lago along the Southeasterly 24 prolongation of the Northeasterly boundary line of said Parcel 2 and said Northeasterly boundary line of said Parcel 2, S. 330 19 ' 26 50" E. 70.21 feet to an angle point of said O.R. 89-205930; thence 27 28 Page 2 of 3 l EXHIBIT "A" 1 ANNEXATION NO. 143 TO COUNTY SANITATION NO. 7 1 2 Continuing along said Parcel 2 boundary, S. 28° 18 ' 03" E. 85. 16 3 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. 4 5 The above described parcel of land contains 0.585 acres. 6 Attached and made a part here of is a map designated as Exhibit 7 nBu 9 10 PREPARED BY: oQpOFESSIO,y_ ELMER L. CHRISTIANSEN �e0 VCT 'may 11 CHRISTIANSEN AND ASSOCIATES 32432 ALIPAZ ST. , STE N w W.10609 s 12 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CA 92675 * Era 31 OWL S6 � (714) 493-3321; 493-3572 13 si C L ATfOF CAUI 14 15 THIS PROPOSAL DOES MEET THE APPROVAL 16 OF THY ORANGE COUNTY SURVEYOR'S OFFICE. 17 DATE T I DAY 0 192¢. 1 t ' N r 16 JOHN AN Y SURVEYOR N 19 No.4408 .9/30187 20 21 Cµ�' 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 3 of 3 B K NODULE 3RBZBJT on. 1 95J Z ANNEXATION NO. 143 TO • COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 / /// \\��9 / Curre • RaElus Della Length C2 270.00' ITI6'36- 157.05 C3 270.0G ID'37'04- 50.04 I C4 I60.00, 9-04150- 28.53 I 0 1 I 1 108 A, I I 4, 0 I I I20 2014 P D. B. 120' 30' I �se55fi 6 ^ �pE'LV DI O-J I '4.ro 2Y I \Od 5aa 10 •1 33.19'50'E) 8'iB'03•E i I k 'A I I 0.21 - -85.T6'G9G a0 YAN C T. P. 0. B. I 1`^ �� � ��� esU� •S/9p/B7 I $Iv O I � o�li^ nnnn � 1 I �I I I \ THIS PROPOSAL DOES MEET THE APPROVAL I __————__ I I OF THE ORANGE COU SURVEYORS OFFICE I el Nlu �A I �� DATED THISDAY F - 1E2[r 01 I "18 A, b as /� COUNTY SURVEY 120 20'Is O $i I� PREPARED BY: TV I I 25' ELMER L CHRISTIANSEN I (N33'19'S0'M) 1 CHRISTIANSEN AND ASSOCIATES I (120.639 1 1 M32 ALIPAL ST.,STE N I IfS.BJ' I 1 SAN JUANCAPIB CA 32875 I I 1 C'(7(1 3J 1/)40QJ/211);/4B3,3572}J572 I I /�� I 1 GCP4R• L-.Ana fxDF AREA OF ANNEXATION=0.585 AC. LEGEND: cc�.T EXIST. BOY LINE /FpFCalpoa ANNEXATION BOY LINE INDICATES RECORD PER TR.694, REC. IN SK. 31, PP. 30 THROUGH 32 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, O.C. RECORDS. ] INDICATES RECORD PER ANNEXATION NO. 78-TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 9508 AND ADJACENT AREA ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY; BOARD OR DIRECTORS RESOLUTION NO. 78.180-7. INDICATES RECORD PER PARCEL 2 OF DEED, REC. AS INST. NO. 89-205930, O.C. RECORDS. BLOCK NODULE B=$IBIT •�B^ L 5 Sly 6 ANNEXATION NO. 143 TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 Y Curve • Radius Delta Length ��O 1 Cl 270.00' 22.53'40' 107.86 C3 270.00' 10'37'04' 50.04 I C4 100.00' 9'04'50' 2&53 I I 1 1108 I I • ryl I I 4i 0. 120 20 i 03 P. 0. B. 120' 3o' I 9A9 5` 391 < 61 R 9c"" I q ----- ----- I -` CE yi\N�S�DI g. 25' 1 60A0"�leg 11) b �Jh I 70.21' V mI116" O Cl. �a O •I 33'19'SV E) 8'18,03'E gI' 2 I 10F �Q I 0.21 — ' T>5.III,- T. P. 0. B. Iry o I OF PROPOSAL ODES MEET THE APPROVAL ——_—__—_ 1. I 1 OF THE ORIWO�� SURVEYORS OFFICE q % � OATED TNISZOAY F q� COUNTY SURVEYO20• 20'1eIPREPARED BY25 EWM L V;USTIANSEN(N33.19'S0'N11CMISTIANSEN AND ASSOCIATES (128.93') I 32432 ALIPAZ S%STEN )98.8), 1 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO.CA MI5 I I 1 G'('7714)19D3-MI;449 35�72 I I � 1 11 GX�LI(, L--Aa+° e�OIWD'YY AREA OF ANNEXATION =0.585 AC. LEGEND: cc�T EXIST. BOY LINE 1jFRf CAsFOP ANNEXATION 8DY LINE INDICATES RECORD PER TR.694, REC. IN BK 31. PP. 30 THROUGH 32 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, O.C. RECORDS. ] INDICATES RECORD PER ANNEXATION NO. 78-TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 9688 AND ADJACENT AREA ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY; BOARD OR DIRECTORS RESOLUTION NO. 78-180-7. INDICATES RECORD PER PARCEL 2 OF DEED, REC.AS INST. NO. 89-205930, O.C. RECORDS. JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING AGENDA DECEMBER 14, 1994 District 14 Agenda Item (9)(K): Consideration of motion approving Settlement Agreement with Multek, Inc. in the amount of $44,000.00 relative to administrative penalties for wastewater discharge violations. Summary Multek, Inc. (Multek) is a printed circuit board manufacturer located in Irvine that was subject to administrative proceedings due to wastewater discharge violations discovered through surveillance sampling. On September 6, 1994, the Districts issued an Administrative Complaint to Multek pursuant to the authority of California Government Code Sections 54740.5, 54740.6 and Section 615. D of the Districts' Wastewater Discharge Regulations (Ordinance). In the Administrative Complaint, Districts' staff recommended that Multek be assessed an administrative penalty in the amount of $44,000 based on the severity and constancy of the sampling results. Districts' staff met with Multek to review the evidence regarding the discharge violations. Subsequently, Multek agreed to settle all matters related to the enforcement action, and agreed to pay in full the $44,000 administrative penalty. On November 17, 1994 Multek delivered a check for the total sum of $44,000.00. Staff Recommendation: Receive and file staff report dated November 29, 1994, and pursuant to Article IV, Section 4.3 of Districts' Resolution No. 93-13 (Settlement of Civil Administrative Enforcement Actions) authorize staff to enter into a settlement agreement between Multek, Inc. and County Sanitation District No. 14 of Orange County, and to accept the payment from Multek, Inc. in the amount of $44,000 pursuant to the terms of the settlement agreement. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS s+° BI ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA November 29, 1994 10 BLL6 nvENME P.a BOX 8127 \_7 MWAIN VLL ..MFGA °92) 8127 a1°1MQ 11 STAFF REPORT REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION TO ENTER INTO A SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN MULTEK, INC. AND COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 14 BACKGROUND Multek, Inc. (Multek) is a large printed circuit board manufacturer located in Irvine, California that was subject to Districts' administrative enforcement proceedings based on violations of the Districts' Wastewater Discharge Regulations (Ordinance), which occurred from September 7, 1993, through January 12, 1994. The results of surveillance sampling conducted by the Districts for the subject time period established that Multek failed to comply with the provisions of the Districts' Ordinance and the Federal Categorical Pretreatment Standards. By letter dated September 6, 1994, the Districts transmitted to Multek an Administrative Complaint issued pursuant to the authority of California Government Code Sections 54740.5, 54740.6 and Section 615. D of the Districts' Ordinance. In the Administrative Complaint, Districts' staff recommended that Multek be assessed an administrative penalty in the amount of $44,000. The staff's recommendation was based on the severity and constancy of the sampling results, which alleged that Multek violated its wastewater discharge limit for pH on 27 occasions by discharging acidic and caustic waste to the sewerage system. Multek also violated its copper limit on four occasions. A hearing regarding this matter was originally scheduled for October 10, 1994. Prior to the hearing, Districts' staff met with Multek to review the evidence regarding discharge violations. Subsequently, Multek elected to waive its rights to a hearing and settle all matters related to these enforcement proceedings, including payment in full of the $44,000 penalty. On November 17, 1994, Multek delivered a check for the total sum of $44,000. RECOMMENDATION Pursuant to Article IV, Section 4.3 of Districts' Resolution No. 93-13 (Settlement of Civil Administrative Enforcement Actions), Districts' staff recommends that District No. 14 enter into a Settlement Agreement with Multek and accept Multek's payment of $44,000 to satisfy the terms and conditions of the agreement. �� J:\MP 3M\I VRE\MULnKBO �1 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING AGENDA DECEMBER 14, 1994 Agenda Item (11 ): Consideration of motion to receive, File and approve the staff Summary Financial Report for the three-month period ending September 30, 1994 (copy attached). Summary Attached are the budgetary financial statements for the first quarter of the fiscal year. The Joint Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Budget statements were reviewed by the Finance and Personnel Committee on November 16, 1994. If any Director has questions pertaining to the statements, please call Gary Streed, Director of Finance, at (714) 962-2411, ext. 2500. Recommendation: That the Joint Boards of Directors receive, file and approve the Summary Financial Report for the three-month period ending September 30, 1994. i: mcnnxtvwreos rtmue,z,aw.wco COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS d ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA December 14, 1994 to04 EW5 2 V n.BON 0127 fWNTNN VgLEV,f IMA.I>927N8 121 Joint Boards of Directors "141M4411 County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14 of Orange County, California Subject: Summary Financial Report for Three Months Ended September 30, 1994 Transmitted herewith is the Summary Financial Report for three months ended September 30, 1994. The statements summarize the fiscal activities of the joint operations and the individual Districts through the first quarter of the 1994-95 fiscal year and the status of each with respect to the approved budgets. The combined 1994-95 budget for all Districts is $678.5 million, of which approximately 29% is for capital expenditures for facilities improvements and additions, including reserves for said capital projects. The total budgeted revenue and expense categories of the several Districts are set forth below. TABLE COMPARATIVE BUDGET SUMMARY (MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) Increase 199445 REQUIREMENTS 1993-94• 1994-9P .se %of Budaet JOINT TREATMENT WORKS 0, M 9 R $ 49.6 E 49.5 $ (.1) 7.3% COLLECTION SYSTEM 8 OTHER DISTRICT 0,M 8 R 126 9.5 (3.1) 1 A% TREATMENT PLANT CONSTRUCTION APPROPRIATIONS 70.0 97.8 (2.2) 10.0% DISTRICT SEWER CONSTRUCTION APPROPRIATIONS 27.4 18.8 (8.6) 28% DEBT ISSUE$SERVICE(G.O.S C.O.P.) 41.4 39.8 (1.6) 5.8% SUB-TOTAL $2 O0 Sjjl;i4 $ 1f 5.6) 27.3% CONSTRUCTION RESERVES $110.0 $110.0 $ 0.0 16.2% OTHER RESERVES 324.9 393.1 58.2 56.5% SUB-TOTAL $434.9 $49_31 $ 58.2 72.7% TOTAL REQUIREMENTS S®.9 $678.5 $ 42.6 100.0% FUNDING CARRY-OVER $ 73.3 E 68.1 $ (7.2) 9.7% APPROPRIATED RESERVES 347.0 369.3 22.3 54.5% SUB-TOTAL $420.3 $435.4 E 15A 64.2% TAX ALLOCATION S 31.9 $ 31A $ (.8) 4.6% FEES 89.6 92.7 3.1 13.7% BORROWING 60.0 84.5 24.5 12.4% INTERESTS OTHER 34.1 3�8 _7 5.1% SUB-TOTAL $2156 6249.1 $ 27.5 358% TOTAL FUNDING $635.9 S678.5 $L2=6 100.0% 'ADJUSTED FOR INTER-DISTRICT TRANSACTIONS. r P Summary Financial Report Page 2 December 14, 1994 Included in each Districts statement is a summary of the above major income and expense categories and an itemization of their trunk sewer construction projects and respective share of the joint works expansion. Authorized general reserves and inter-fund transfers have been excluded from the budget column on said statements as expenditures are not charged directly against such appropriations. Summarized below are comments relative to the financial statements. The statements are presented on an accrual basis and, therefore, inter-district cash transactions for fiscal 1994-95 which were accrued in 1993-94 are not reflected in the year-to-date balances. CASH AND INVESTMENTS Earned interest generated by our continuing program of investing reserve funds (primarily capital funds accumulated for construction of required sewerage facilities) is $7.7 million through the first quarter of the year. As of September 30, 1994, 93% of our funds were invested with the County Treasurer's commingled investment program. The remaining 7% of funds, representing the debt service reserves, is in a separate special bond fund at the County Treasurer's or a guaranteed investment contract, both controlled by the trustees for each issue. JOINT OPERATING FUND This fund accounts for operations, maintenance, and administrative activities relative to the Districs'jointly-owned treatment and disposal facilities. The JO expenditures along with the self-funded insurance program costs are monitored by the Finance and Personnel Committee and if some unexpected expenditures are experienced, they are reviewed by the Committee. Salaries and Wages -There are several authorized but unfilled positions and, thus, some minor payroll savings have been realized to date. Employees' Benefits - Includes Retirement, Workers'Compensation, Unemployment Insurance, Group Medical Insurance and Uniforms. Charcebacks to Districts and CORF- Payroll expenses are charged back to CORF through the cost accounting system for work on the treatment plants' capital expansion program, and to individual Districts for work on Districts' collection facilities capital expansion projects as well as maintenance and repair of said systems. Source Control Division charges to respective Districts are also included in these chargebacks. Gasoline. Oil & Fuel - Includes all fuel for motor pool. A large portion is recovered through our equipment billing system and included in revenue below. Insurance - Budget amount includes Board and staff out-of-county travel policy, employee fidelity, boiler, fire, earthquake and all risk insurance policies, and pro-rata cost of the self- funded liability insurance program. Expense is in line with annual budget. Summary Financial Report Page 3 December 14, 1994 Memberships - Includes the cost of membership in CASA, AMSA, SARFPA, WateReuse and other organizations. Annual membership costs are recorded when paid. Office Expense -This account includes various types of office supplies, postage, stationery, computer supplies and related items. Chlorine and Odor Control Chemicals - Primarily for influent and sludge odor control at treatment plant sites. The main chemicals used to control odors are hydrogen peroxide and ferrous chloride. Ferric chloride is used as a supplemental odor control chemical, and caustic soda is also used in air scrubbers throughout the plants to reduce hydrogen sulfide emissions. Use of chlorine has been significantly reduced at the plants. Chemical Coagulants - Expenditures for this item are required to dewater our sludges prior to disposal to comply with Regional Water Quality Control Board requirements. Other Operating Supplies - Miscellaneous items such as solvents, cleaners,janitorial, tools, lab chemicals, etc., purchased throughout the year. Contractual Services -The major elements in this line item are payment for grit removal and disposal at the BKK landfill and payment for removal and off-site beneficial reuse of biosolids or sludge. These costs will increase in the second quarter because of disputes at the thermal ..✓ composting site. Professional Services - Primarily consists of General Counsel's fees, other legal services, audit fees, and miscellaneous consulting services. Printing and Publications - Includes all reproduction activities in-house and with outside services. Equipment Rental Outside Equipment Rental- Primarily for the rental of large cranes and equipment necessary for removing and replacing major pumps, engines and other large equipment during the course of maintenance and repair operations. CSDOC Equipment Rental - Reflects the charges for District-owned equipment used for overhead type activities. There is an offsetting credit applied through the cost allocation system for these charges. Repairs and Maintenance -This item includes parts and supplies for repair of plant facilities. Escalating costs continue to have an impact on this item. Generally, this account runs close to budget each year due to the unpredictability of major equipment failures. Research and Monitoring - Budget includes funds for the ocean monitoring contract required +� by our NPDES permit. Other projects include operational research and evaluation of processes to develop optimum operating parameters, and also include the Districts' annual share of participation in the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Summary Financial Report , Page 4 December 14, 1994 Travel. Meetings 8 Training - Major items are authorized by specific Board actions. Expanding activities of regulatory agencies and the Clean Water Act reauthorization have required additional staff and Board travel. These costs are reviewed separately by the Finance and Personnel Committee each quarter. Utilities-The major item in the Utilities Expense Account is for natural gas purchased for central power generation. Total utilities expenses are in line with the budget, and are down $252,071 from last year. Other Expenses - For items not chargeable elsewhere such as freight, safety supplies, grounds maintenance supplies, etc. Prior Year's Expense -This account is required by the Uniform Accounting System and represents adjustments to an operating or non-operating account balance from the previous year or payment of charges which could not be accrued at year end. Generally, all expenses to this account are recorded in the first quarter. Allocation to Districts and CORF-This is an account established in connection with the cost accounting system and represents materials, supplies and services, overhead chargebacks to the individual Districts and CORF. CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND U This fund accounts for the costs of expanding and improving the Districts'jointly-owned treatment and disposal facilities and represents an average of 37% (excluding reserves) of each Districts' budget requirements for 1994-95. During the first three months, $4.5 million was expended on joint works treatment and disposal facilities improvement and expansion projects. The pro-rata share of joint works improvements and expansion costs is reflected in the financial statements of the respective Districts. INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS -The statements reflect the accounting transactions for the nine Districts and include each respective District's share of the Joint Operating Fund and the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund. Taxes: Tax revenue is allocated to two separate accounts: Tax Allocation -This account represents the anticipated allocation of the Districts' pro- rata share of the maximum 1% basic property tax allowed under Proposition 13. Amounts received in the first quarter are essentially late payments from last year. Tax Levy - This account represents tax funds necessary to make voter-approved outstanding general obligation bond principal and interest payments. In accordance with the Jarvis-Gann initiative, tax levies to satisfy these obligations are not restricted. Only District 11 has a 1994-95 tax levy for bond service. U Federal and State Construction Grants - EPA and SWRCB have historically funded up to 87 Ya% of treatment plant construction for approved projects. All outstanding grant funds have been received and no new grants or SRF loans are budgeted. Summary Financial Report Page 5 December 14, 1994 Fees - All Districts now have an adopted, uniform sewer connection fee schedule. This account also reflects industrial waste user charges levied by seven of the nine Districts pursuant to the Uniform Industrial Waste Ordinance and the Revenue Program, and the user fees implemented in Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13. Annexation fee revenue is unpredictable and, thus, is not included in the budgets unless there is an existing agreement providing for payment of fees. Sale of Capacity Rights - This account records income from sale of capacity rights to outside agencies such as SAWPA, including the capital replacement charge. SAWPA is billed in the fourth quarter each year. Other - Includes the annual joint facilities interdistrict equity adjustment required by the recalculation of the respective ownership percentages. Cost of this adjustment for purchasing Districts is included in each District's Share of Joint Works Construction. Share of Joint Works Construction - Represents each District's share of joint treatment and disposal facilities expansion discussed above under Capital Outlay Revolving Fund (CORF), and the purchase of joint facilities interdistrict equity when appropriate. Bond Retirement and Interest Exoense - Payment of principal and interest on outstanding general obligation bonds and certificates of participation of the respective Districts. Annual budgeted expense for all Districts is approximately $36 million. Share of Joint Operating - Represents each District's share of operating and maintaining the jointly-owned treatment and disposal facilities, and administrative activities. Costs are distributed based upon each District's respective gallonage flow (see Joint Operating Fund statement for details). District Operatino and Other Expenditures - Consists primarily of individual Districts' general operating expenses, industrial monitoring, operations, maintenance and repair of the respective Districts' collection systems. DD:GGS:Ic J:\WpDOG�FIMCRPIlE1pRTLY RPTDEGBI.W Vg COUNTYSA,WTADON DISTRICTS OF ORANGECOUNTY SNMMARYJOINT OPERATIh%VW0RHING CAPITAL FUND BUDGET REVIEW ` 3 MONTHS ENDED WtV94 APPROVED BUDGET YEAR-TO-DATE UNEXPENDED YEAR-TO-DATE 1994415 EXPENDITURES BUDGET %EXPENDED SALARIES.WAGES B BENEFITS Salarlac&Wages 30.758.000 6.905.586 23.852.434 nA5% Payroll Benefits 6.460.000 1,532.061 4.927.939 2372% TOTAL PAYROLL 37,218,000 8,437,627 28780,373 22.67% Loss: Chargeoub to DIM S CORF (10.400.000) (2,506.889) (7,693,111) 24.10% NET JOINT OPERATING PAYROLL M.818.000 5,930,738 20,887,262 22.11% MATERIALS.SUPPLIES S SERVICES Gasoline,011 S OMael 175.000 46.620 128.380 26.51% Inaursnce 1.200.000 302.091 897,909 25.17% Memberships w,mo 25.811 32,189 M.50% Office Expanse 435.000 39.089 395.911 8.99% Chlorine S Odor Control 2.580,000 WA07 2,239.393 13.20% Chemleal Coagulants 1.145.M 298.343 846.657 26.06% Other Operating Supplies 1.007.000 164,947 842,053 16.38% Contractual Service. 6,825A00 1,343.911 5.481.089 19.69% ProteesialW 3aMrea 1,164,000 400,434 6,424,566 5.87% Printing&Publication 330.000 59,01 270,049 18.17% Equipment Rental 215,000 61.460 153.640 28.%% Repair 6 Maintenance 3.675.000 959.624 2.715,376 26.11% Remuch B Monitoring 3.050,000 619.117 2.430,683 2030% Tavel,Meeting S Training 250,000 21.928 228,072 &m Uncollectlble Accounts 25.000 0 2S.m 0.00% Ut11Ntes 3.915.000 693.314 3.221.686 17.71% Other Expenses 900.000 200,930 699,070 22.33% Prior Yaam Expsres 25.000 0 25.000 0.00% Non Operating Expense 60.000 18,908 41,052 31.58% \.w/ TOTAL MATERIALS S SERVICES 27,024.000 5.597.125 21.426,575 20.71% Less: Allocation W DIM S CORF (600D00) (1OSD43) (490,957) 18.17% NET JOINT OPER MATERIALS B SERVICES 26.424,000 5.488.082 20.935.918 20.77% TOTAL JOINT OPERATING EXPENSES 53.242,000 11.418,820 41.823.180 21.45% REVENUES Renames (3,710.000) (1,119.539) (2,590,4fil) 30.18% Lose: Allocaton a DIM S CORF 10,000 9,250 750 M50% NET JOINT OPERATING REVENUES (3700,000) (1,110,289) (2,589,711) 30.01% NET JOINT OPERATING EXPENSES 49,542,000 ID,308,531 39,233,469 20.81% GALLONAGE DATA M.G.FLOW CHARGES DISTRICT BUDGET TO DATE BUDGET TO DATE 1 2.332 2.162 1.210.320 I.M.414 2 7,716 7.083 4.()N,293 3,W0,478 3 7.164 6.864 3728,169 3.246.883 5 853 873 442,980 412,876 6 1109 1p41 576.120 492,311 �� 7 2.020 1.916 1,048.632 906.473 11 1,444 1.413 749,867 668.425 13 238 220 124,634 103.875 14 593 222 307.871 104.796 23.489 21,794 12,192,286 10,308,531 rue o•emuun mznar am.1 Summary DumfmlYFlnancle RdP. , 3 MrnlA.Ended 9/lOm. Budget Rrvtsw 19"-96 Remaining Yearb ala Budget Y..14 -0.w Budge %EspMOad Beginning Fund Balances,July 1 M,8a9,092 REVENUES: Tax Lear,(good Funds)Only) 0 0 0 0.00% Tax AllocaOmulSuOvenUone(She.of l%) 2.105.000 115.V9 1.989.721 5.4e% Federal and Stale ConstrucOon Grants 0 0 0 0.00% Connection Fees 71,000 11.571 59,129 10.72% Mar Fees 6,472,000 371,040 6.100.960 5.T3% Sale of Capacity Rights ",No 0 38.000 0.00% normal B Mist.Recelpt. 2.374,000 608,679 1.567,321 33.98% OMer 0 0 0 0.00% Total Revenues 11,O0,000 1,3K869 9,755,131 11J10% Total Rovanu0&Beginning Data... 39,BW.961 EXPENDITURES: Shan 0l Joint Wanda Trent Plant&Reserves 18,027.OD 080,991 17,6e8.009 287% District Trunk Sewer Cannot.&Ross.. 125,ODD in 12e.871 O.10% COPIBond Retlnment and Interest E.,.. 9,532,0D0 155.06 9.376,354 1B3% Sham of Joint Warts Opareting E.pan.ee 4.919,DW 1,022.414 3,895,586 20]914 Provided for Ralm0ureamanl Agreements 0 0 0 am% DtsFnal Operating&OMer Expenditure. 593.000 128,235 03,162 21.60% Total Expenditures 33,198,000 1.787,a08 31,006,592 539% Ending Fund Balances 38,096,063 Fac100es Expansion Balance Adjustments Treesferto Balance 21194 &Additions Flood Aesets 9O0/9a CONSTRUCRONWPROGRESS: Miscellaneous Chago W Clausal W.O.9 0 129 129 Su6Tohl 0 129 D 129 Shad.f Jono Wade 4,688.599 480,991 5,160.590 SUFTotal 4,688,599 48D,991 0 5,10'"0 C0 sstj7MD PROPERTY.PUINr&EQUIP, .and and Property Rights 81398 81.398 Collection Unix and Pump$me. 6.888.669 8.666.669 Trammenl Facllltles 0 0 Disposal Facllltles 11.593 11,593 General Plant and Admin.Facll. 58.201 58,241 Equity In Joint Treatment Facll. 68.986,559 (2BAOT) 0 65,960,151 Mar Assets at Coat Lou Amok. 0 0 Tots[Property Plant&Equip. 80,715,058 454,713 0 81,169'"1 mma .wrCNg.2 Summary lRaoN ]Months Ended MOV4 Budget Revlew 1996.95 Remaining ffiabtoa3Me Budget Yaar4.zm. Budget %Expended Lr>/ Beginning Fund Balances,Jury 1 226,146,946 REVENUES: Tax L.,(Bond Fund(s)OnW 0 0 0 0.00% Tax Allocadonsi5uleventions(Sham of l%) 9,515.000 591,708 6923,2N 8.22% Federal And State Compunction Grants 0 0 0 0.00% Connection Face 3.599,000 1,025,536 1523,IN 3942% Other Feae 22639,000 1.305,574 21J33.42B 5n% Salo of Capacity Rights 116,000 0 116.000 0.00% Imam S MISC.Rocalpts 9,981.000 2.203,6m 7,677,397 22,93% War 0 0 0 000% Total Revenues 44,830,000 SaN.si9 39,623,191 11.61% Total Revenue 6 Beginning Belancee 231.30.755 COSENDITIIRES: Shan of Joint Works Tama Plant B Reserves 56,701,000 1.459,758 55,244,242 2.0% District Trunk Sewer Constr.6 Reserves 3.550.000 300,SB2 3,349,433 8.23% COPRImed Retirement and Interest Expense 26.952,000 489.179 25.462821 1.8m Shen of Joint Works Opereting Expenses 16,271,000 3.3$0,I78 12.920,522 20.59% Poll for Reimbursement Agreement 0 0 000% Oistict Operating 8 Other Expenditures 2225,000 530,087 1686133 24.Y1% Total Expenditures 105,799,000 8.135,0U 99.663.161 Ss0% Ending Fund Belences =S5 W,906 Facilities U Snslon \qr Balance Adjustments TnNforto swaps 711194 6Additions Fixed Assets 9O0186 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: 2-14-SR2 SARI Manhole 1,880 2159 1.929 2-7A Atwood Subtunk®911"marchenge 0 BOB gas 24.1 Lincoln Interceptor Sewer 26 26 2.36 Sewer Enrasamamb for AT S SF Commuter Rail 4,997 6.604 11.601 2d2 Orange S Olive Subtunk 2.931 2.01 242 Sal Trunk Ure Diversion Gated Monitodnp IN 1W 241 SARI Relief Sewer 63,535 63.535 2AA1 Cypress Ave.Subtrma,Sewer Rehab, 322,604 NI.Sa0 614,144 MIIC Chile to Closed Work Ordem 9.250 I,308 10.Q4 245 Euclid Trunk IS Interceptor 321 M Sub-Total So.036 200,562 0 708,WS Shan W Joint Works 14155,699 1,450.058 15,612,457 SYb-Total 14,155,699 1,45,11,75111 0 15,612,457 COMPLETED PROPERTY.PLANT 6 EQUIP, Land and Preperty Rights 517,694 517,694 Co11.11cm LING and Pump Stns. 93,602.317 93,692,317 Tmatmerd FacliMes 0 0 Oleposal Faclll0re 33.122 33,112 Baneml Plant and Admin.Fell. 211,453 211,453 Equity In Joint Treatment Fact]. 205,314,792 (79.978) 0 205,234739 Other Assets at Cest Lees Amort 29.715 (1]83) 27.932 `/ Total Property Plant S Equip. 314.360.505 1,625.564 0 316,036,369 �oenry 5ammu.n 0/soncl No.3 $ummary 0uarra n,F/nests,Report 3 MOnms Ended9OO94 Budget Revlaw 1994-95 Remaining Yeor4o-0ale Budget Year-t Date Budget %Expanded 1 I Beginning Fund Balances,July 1 316,083.669 REVENUES, Tax Lovy(Bond Fund(s)Only) 0 0 0 0.00% Tex AlleoaUons/9ubvenMns(Sham of 1%) 10,615,000 02.%3 9,93ZO7 SAM Federal and Slam Construction Gmao 0 0 0 0.00% COnneetlon Fee. 1,410,000 786,742 843,258 54.38% Om.,Fee. 22,120,000 1.011.267 21.108,733 4.5T% Sale of Ca Mciy Rights 1".= 0 in.o 0 0.00% Interest&Mix.Receipts 10,211,000 2.245.374 7,965,628 21.99% Omer 3,2T3,000 0 3,273.000 0.0094 TOW Revenues 47,752,000 4,703,948 4J,049,054 9.86% Total Revenue&Beginning Balances 223,SM,635 RXPRNORVRE51 Share of Joint Works Trot Plant B Reserves 55,813.m 1,539.467 64,273,533 2]0% District Trunk Sewer Conan.S Reserves t,422,000 98,SM 1,330,416 6.7/% COPMond Retirement and Internet Expense 23,882.= 469,912 M.302.088 1.97% Sham of Joint Words Operating Expenses 15,149,000 3,246,M 11. 02.119 21.43% Previded for Reimbumement Agreements 0 0 0 0.00% Discount 0pomting&Mar Ex andltum, 2,512,000 508,1811 2,003,832 20.23% Tool Expenditures N,7630M 5,061.014 92,901,986 693% Ending Fund Balances 217,728,621 Facilities ExpanMOn Balance Adjustments Transform Balance �xrav 7/1154 SAddlllons Fixed Axes, 9I30M4 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: -24-2 Lampaon Interceptor Sewer 10291 10,291 346 Onu. eWxtsm Sub-Trunk Relief Sewn 68,97 58,537 11-17 Sister P/S Upgrade-3511 582285 52,9n s35,224 Toshio Pipe Replacement 348,502 (17,040) 330,862 34SR RepI.Westminster Ave.Force value 141,8441 sties 148,592 3.97 Id Weaning Project 7,972 T,BYJ 3J851IIIerMol0er Trunk Sewer Improvements 71200 54.347 125,547 Miscellaneous Charges m Closed W.O. 21 21 Sub-TOtsI 1.218462 96,SM 0 1,314,94s Sham of Joint Word 15.049,700 1.539,467 16.589,107 SuFTofol. 16,M9,ID0 /,539,467 0 16AB9,16T COMPLETED PROPERTY PLANT a EQUIP: Lend and Pmp.n,Rights 2B0231 260,231 Collection Linea and Pump Sms. 82,059 523 62.059.523 Tmobnem Facilities 99n 9 922 Disposal FaelBtlee 28.419 28p19 General Plant and Admin.path. 316,008 316,008 Equity In Joint Treatment petit. 215,0 .nS (M,519) 0 214.917,709 Other Assets at Coal Less Amom. 1.405 (1.405) 0 Tool Property Plant S Equip. 293,965,798 1,60,12T 0 295,515,925 `vary only an'shumn Ulamct No.5 Summary QuarteNy Flnencfaf Roporf 3 Mordes Ended SO(MI4 Budget Rovlaw 1994-95 Remaining yft P p a Budget Year-to0.Date Budget %Experlde0 `►� BeOlnning Fund Balances,July 1 U.721,6411 REVENUES: Tax Lovy,(Bond Fund(s)Only) O 0 0 am Tax Allocstios/Subventlons(Sham of l%) 2.415.000 154.752 2.260.246 B.AI% Federal and Stale Construction Grants 0 0 0 0.00% Connection Fees 47,OOO 0 47,000 0.0016 Other Fee. 2759.000 M,T91 2674,209 3.03% Sale of Capacity Rights 14.00o 0 14600 0.M% Interest S Misc.Receipts 2.306.090 453.575 1852425 19.6796 Other 3.814,000 0 3,814000 0.00% Total Raeen... 11,355.000 redo 10,661.882 6.10% Total Revenue&Beginning Balances 88,414,TBT EXPENDITURES: Shan or Joint Works T.L Plant S Reserves 8.584.000 0;310 6.391690 2.63% Olstict Trunk Sewer Content.&Roserven 834,000 (80.IW) 920.858 -1041% COPIBond RBtimmamt and Interest Expense 3,920,000 91,676 3,828,324 2.o4% Sham of Joint Waft Operating Expenses 1.800.000 412,876 1.387,124 22.94% Prevlded for Holmbumement Agreements 1M,= 0 ta9600 D96% District Operating&Other Expendhums 702,000 129,210 662,784 10.32% Total Expenditures 14,019,000 719,220 1],299,]80 5.13% Ending Fund Balances 54,BB6,M] Facilities Expan.lon Balance Adjustments Transform Balance 711M &Addition Fixed Asaeb 913M CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: $43 Bay End,PIS Imp, 300.09 22,526 3301595 Inc,Ensconced Service @ Lido PIS 106 IN 5d5 So.Coast Trunk Smsm4nc1 Phases 1&2 2.217.173 (301,095) 1,918,OT8 Sd6 Crystal Cove PIS 141,55a 69,487 211,045 544 Boyalda DC Trunk Sewer lmpr.Phases 1,2&3 503 03 5J0 Car Dal Mar PIS 8,427 B,42T LMo PIS Q MSP Upgrade 25,670 25.670 Miscellaneous Charges la Closed W.O. 11348 1,S48 5-31 Coast Hlghway Fort.Mein Replacement 5&6 6.135 BASS 5.32 Sham-Pt&Rocky Pt PIS Improve.5 A 6 251 1,426 I'M 5-374&4 PCH Gravity S.Rehab 5&6 1.068.000 120,798 1,7118,198 5-39 Slplmn S&6 695,190 695.100 S.b-Talsl 5,O72,633 (M.858) 0 4,MS,TTS Smosof Jalyd Work. t 722,797 172,310 1,895,107 S.0.Total 1.722.797 172,310 0 1,895,107 COMPLETED PROPERTY PLANT&EQUIP land and Property Rights 69,740 69.740 Collection Lines and Pump Sham. 30,271.w 30,TT1 544 Treatment Facllltiea 7,347 7,347 Dlspoeal Facilities 7,115 7,115 General Plant and Admin.Facil, 31,965 31,965 Equity In Joint Treatment FaclL 24.682.679 (9Ae0) 0 24,873.219 Other Annals at Cost Less Amort- 48,025 (],Uox) 39,021 Total Property Plantfl Equip. 62JIH,M6 68,9M 0 62,680,63I ancial Summary Gps.Ended 9,304s Report , 3 ManmS Endep9gOPJ0 Budget R.W. 1994-96 Remaining YeartaDats Budget Year4 ,ed Budget %Expendud m... Beginning Fund Balances,July 1 34,877,719 REVENUES: Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Only) 0 0 0 0.00% Tax AllocationslSubventions(Sham of l%) 1.225,000 77,316 1,147,984 6.31% Federal and Spate Construction Greets 0 0 0 0.00% Connection Fees 47,000 21,282 25,718 4526% Other F. 3.385,000 281,093 3,103,9O7 7.70% Sete of Cepactiy Rights 19.000 0 to.= 0,00X Interest B Mae.Recelpts 1,80s.wo 379.171 126g,829 22.59% Other 21115.OD0 0 2,115,000 0.00% Total Revenues 0,410,090 729,862 7,680,136 S68% Total Revanuo S Beginning Balanced 35,607,581 EXPENDITURES: Sham of Joint Works Tend.Plant 6 Reserves 9,712.000 244.186 9.467.812 2.51% Grind Trunk Saver Cdtr.S Resames 881,000 351.462 329,533 51.61% COPIRond Ra marom and Interest Expense 3,089,000 91.222 2,997,728 2.95% Sham of Joint Works Operating Expemea 2,341,ODO 492.311 i'mB,68g 21.03% Provided for Reimbumement Agreements 0 0 0 0.00% D19MU OpnNing&Mar ExpendlWres 286,000 32.931 253,089 11.51% Tole)Experedibrres MINIM 1,212,169 1096,831 TJO% Ending Fund Balances 3g395,412 Facilities Expansion Balance Adjustments Tranelerto Balance sw,/ VIII94 &Manor. Funded Assets 900194 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Rise.Chg.to Closed Work Order (32.892) (3289Z) 1414 A S B Gisler let,W-2 Baker Street V8.910 318,161 wrya" 6.12 Felrvniw Relief 240,576 240,576 6-03 Air Bass Seven Abandonment 13,B67 2.688 10255 5411 Ooaet Rlghway Force Mein Replacement 566 336 308 542 Bider Pt B Rocky PI PIS impel 536 92 519 811 5J17 Y PCR Greatly Sus Rehab 5It 6 417,000 30.199 60,199 539 Siphon 666 36,589 30,589 SUFTotsI 962,314 351,467 9 1,313.781 Shamol Jelnl Works 2.409.123 20,188 2.853,311 Su4Tctal 2,409,11113 244,100 0 2.653,311 COMPLETED PROPERTY PLANT 6 EOUIP Land and Property Rights 582 562 Collection Lines and Pump SW. 2.371,957 2,371,987 TmabedM Facilities 2.653 2 853 Disposal Facilities 7,394 7,394 General Plant and Admin.Facil. 93.421 93,421 Equity in Joint Treatment Facll. 33,373,836 (13,406) 0 33.360.432 Other Assets M Coat Leas Amon 23,245 (3.559) 19AN Total Property Plain 6 Eifel, 39244,137 MAN 0 39,823,227 eaa✓ mY a"unmon losernt.Nal Summery OwIMy FMenvMl Rapal r, ]MMIAs EndW N0?e BuaaetRMwr _ 19Ba-96 pemalnlnp y—lo-Cos, end'm YeanmAate Budpet %Eapanaea ` . Sal Fund Balances,July 1 90,fi68,d89 Tam L.,(Bond FundX)Only) 0 0 0 0. T..AlleutXnsWimentiona(Sham of 1%1 3.2M.000 199end ]..w 006% Fader end Stela Construction Grinds 0 0 0 000% C.....a..Fee 235.001) 807,640 (5720ea) ]a].0% M.P. S.B]2W0 301120 5,0]0.812 nN% Sam of Capacity Rights WA00 0 ]O.CW 000% Inlemt B MXc.Racelpn 2.SSSAW 82nAld 2,928.114 2102% ONm 0 0 0 O00% Tocal Revenue 1],]62,000 2,230,316 11,061,Bee U.M Tonal A—.-8 Bpinnln9 Balances 92.676,175 EXPENDINRES: Sham ofJolM Wodu TIm.Plan B Reserves 1T,62B.IXB 371.682 17,268,303 2.11% DXtlktTrvnk Sex+a Coneb.6Reeerve ].lwjNO BB3.120 2.225,080 2801% CCPIBond Rednmantand Mmrml Eapeee 5843.002 100,977 5406,022 2A7% Seem of Joint mums OpenunB Expense 4.2B1,ON pill 9,35a.527 21.2T Provided As,RelmSunemenl ABmemenX 0 0 0 00096 OlaWct Ofanunp S Omer Expendlunm I,732.0110 327,399 1,404.601 16,90% Tote,Eeendwed, ]2.212,0N 2,625,66E 29,657,]]4 8.13% Ending Fund BspA..S 90,250,51m Facilities.Expenabn Ssiaee Adjustments TnNXIb Bain "IM AAddivae Fled Assets NM6 CON4IRIIC110NINPROGRE55: 7-22 Parlisl 6 Rapl.Leman McIghts 461050 79,004 124.051 \mmJ 7.234 COIIpe Aw.Pump Set Repl Fane Mein. 14..W IOASi 7-180nn,Perk Acm Sege Study 120.111 SOf 12011E 7.19 Cavnn heights Sensor U,Tw 392 won 7-7-0Main Sheet PS 21.033 3.574 24,807 Manhole Adjustments Re.OnnBe County LIB 2N 1N4A 8 B Clear let,1413 Baker Sma. Force Mein Discrete B,T A 14 496.347 Mind 12111M1 7.114,2,3 ABandanmenl and Mods.of PM 1,BN l.ew San Mine Easement lode.Books 10.239 1330e MA Abandon B PS,T-1N62 213.98E 12.0B Mal? ]61A 9unBevnr let 18.M 18.02 7.16 L.mon XeiehX gear S7JOS2 5I.092 Main Sbel Flume Yddar SBS SI S 7-1-1 GXIerMedMll Tmnk Abandonnonl 2262 2.282 TachlXPlpe Replacament 93,239 (51710) BL52B 7-20NevyWry PMA9andanmenl 30.4117 58.197 BS9M 747 Crunch,Park Aetna Saner Repl. 13,7114 12.10 25,952 Mein Serves Flume FlowmNer 1,558 1.50 MIWOeepus Cbaryes to Closed W.O. all 1.111 1.722 Sub�TnM1 1ANA12 883.120 0 2.00.eu Shen.f AuMWoda 3.510,728 371.01 3.155A25 Suo-ioml 3,503,728 371.697 a 216SAG COMPLEIEO PROPERLY.PLr1Nf6 EOWP: Lend and Pmwb w9hts +SMA01 +.S19.BM Collection Lines and Pump Stan. 38.072.MS NA = Tom...,Fad11Ns 0 0 Disposal Facilities 10.782 10.782 General Plant and Admen.Facll. 94,240 ft" Equity In Joint Tneunent each, S1,1N,105 (20A07) a 51.140.739 ONer A...el Co..Lee Arced. I2,440 0.732) 8.703 To.'PmwM Plant 8 E0ul, B],BIa,01B 1,230,878 0 M,FN,BBT umy>amvv.n ulsfnct no.ft Summaryoness n ed Weep Report ]Menus Ended SOOGd Budi of Ravlew 1994-95 Ramelning year4o4.te Budget Yam4o.Dah Budget %11,mivad Beginning Fund Balances,July 1 56,NI,UTS REVENUES: Ta.Levy(Bond Funds)Only) 17,000 1,09T 15,903 0.00% T=AilourtlonYSu0ventions(Sham of l%) 2.041,000 129,112 1,911,888 0.03% Federal and Slate Con ll ucton Gree s 0 0 0 0,00% CorreNon Fee. 118,000 3$911 85.089 27,89% Other Fees 3,172,000 130.401 3035.599 430% Sale of Capacity Rights 23.000 0 23000 0.009A letsmnt&MI...R.Fints 2.345,000 547,698 1.797.302 2338% Other 294,000 0 294000 000% Total Revenue. 8,010,000 647,219 7.162,781 tOS6X Total Rmnuo&Beginning Balances 6T,T99,24 EXPENONURES: Sham of Join WOMB Ten.Plant&gnomes 12.000.000 295,9et 11802.119 245% Otstslpt Trunk Sewer Courts.&Reforms 4,163,000 30 .020 3.857,371 7.34% COPIMnd Retirement and Inherent Expeneo 4,299,000 132,332 4,166,606 3.08% Sham of Joint Wanks Operate,Eapeneec 3,047,000 688,425 2,378,STS 2184% Provides for Relmhumement Agmameets 0 0 9 0.00% District Operating&Offer Expeedilums 842.000 147.6n 694,323 17.54Y. Total Expenditures 24,449,000 I.M.ga4 22.699,056 6.34% Ending Fund Balances 56,t]B,]60 Facllities ExPanslon l / Seen. Ad)ustnante TraMtsrto Sellers. IIIM &AddMons Fixed Assets 9D094 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: 11-104R Valve Repair @ Slater Ave.PIS 187 187 11.17 Slater PIS Sewage Sys lmprov. 2.70,962 305,629 3.012.811 J4U1&J-3M Flow M. 252 252 Su6Tofal 2,707,421 305.629 0 3.O13,U60 Sham M Joint Works 2,884,547 29AS81 3,160.428 Su>Tobl 2,984,1547 296,001 0 3,180,428 COMPLETED PROPERTY.PLANT&EQUIP: Land and Property Rights 146,886 149,986 Collection Lines and Pump Sthe. f9,04B,602 19.048A02 TreaMeMFacllltias 0 0 Disposal Facilities 3.03 3,053 general Plant and Admin.Facll. 28.099 20.699 Equity In Joint Tembeent Facil. 40.491,013 (16.244) 0 40.474.769 Other Assatsat Cost Lees Amon. 0 0 Total Property Plant&Equip. 65,310,321 5655,M 0 0,895,68T v Summary Qua maul,FLIen42al RaPorr, s ]Months Ended L]OM Budget Review 1994-95 Remaining YeaMe-0a1e Budget Year4o-Date Budget %Expanded Beginning Fund Sau nces,July 1 16,367,552 REVENUES: Tax Levy(Bond Fondle)Only) 0 0 0 0 00% Tax AllocetionslSuaven0ons(Sham of l%) 0 0 0 0.00% Federal and State Constucton Giants 0 0 0 0.00% Connection Fuca 470.000 121035 345.965 25.75% Other Fees alo.m 39,807 m.lw 4.91% Sale of Capacity Rights 4,000 0 4,U00 13.0% Internet&Misc.Race[" 721.000 196,132 5N.S66 27.M% Other 0 0 0 000% Total Revenues 2.05,000 356.974 1,BN,026 17.80% Total Revenue It Beginning Balances 16.724.626 EXPENDRLRES: Share cf Joint World Tenet.Plant B Reserves 2.466.000 45,293 6p20,707 1.84% decades Trunk Sewer Contra.B Rewrves 470.000 0 4"'Idd, 0.00% COP/Bond Retirement and lnbrut Expense V,DOM 5.101 21.599 18,89% Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses WON, 103,875 400.125 20SI% Pneeked for Reimbursement Agreements 0 0 0 0.00% District Opened,&OMer Expamours. 86,000 10.474 75,526 12.18% Total Expedience 3,553,008 IKM 3481 4.64% Ending Fund Balances 18,559,TB1 Faulitles Expansion Bela. Adjustments TmnBferto Balance 711M &Addition. Fixad Auld SOMM" CONSTRUCTN)N INPROGRE55: Shan of Joint Walls 430.070 45,293 475,363 SUFTodI &30AT0 45,293 0 475,381 COMPLETED PROPERTY.PLAM&EQUIP: Land and Property Rights 0 0 Collection U.s.and Pump Si 2,462,95T 2,02.957 Treatment Facilities 0 0 Olapoeel Facilities 0 0 General Plant and Mmin.Final. 0 0 Equity In Joint Treatment Feed. 6.040.248 (2,487) 0 6,037,781 Other Meets at Cost Lem Amon. 0 0 Total PnpeM/Plant&Equip. B.SM.VS 42,506 0 8AT6A81 County S.rutoo n DhhmI No.14 $ummery Duamody Fleanclef Repo" - 3MerrthsEnded"OdW Budget Revbw 19"-95 Remalnln9 Ye..4 lode Budget yes.4 We Budget %Expanded Beginning Fund Balances,July 1 6Z024,833 REVENUES: Tax Le,(Send Fund(a)Only) 0 m 0 0.00% Tax Allccationsl5u0vemons(Sham of l%) 0 0 0 MIo% Focused and Stets Construction Grade 0 0 0 BM IRWD Fees 20.400,000 Z69Z278 1)707)24 13. Other Fees 0 0 0 O.M Sale of CePac ty Rights 25.000 0 25,000 0.00% Interest&Misc.Receipts 559.000 29,588 529,412 sf2 ONer 0 0 0 0.00116 Total Revenues 30,980.000 2,M,860 18,262,136 128T% Total Revenue&Beginning Belanua 69.746,697 EXPENDITURES: Share of JOIM Worts TML Final&Reddens 13,5117,000 318.558 13,190.442 Z81% DtsblM Trunk Sewer COnsfT.&Reforms 4,221,000 1,891,993 2,399,007 44.09% COPM.Od RetiemeM and Interest Expanse 158.00) 19,549 135.451 123M Sham of Jolts WOM1S Op sting Expenses 1,251,000 104.795 1.148,204 9.30% Pmvlded for Reimbursement Agmemonts 0 0 0 0.00% District Opoetimg&me,Expenditures 425.000 34,531 390,479 8.12% Toll Expenditures 19,632,000 2,367,M 17264,690 IZ86% Ending Fund Balances 67,379,280 Facilities Expansion Selena. AOfustmema Tmoelrto Baled 7IIA4 &AOOMOM Flied Assets 3f30184 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Capacity Purchase loom DIUiche 5&6 3.597 3,597 Mein Smell Flume Flowmeler 2.544 Z544 14-1-1 A&B Gblr Its.,14-1.2 Baker St. Fours Maln,Dls4kl 6.7&14 1,189.97 1 89055T 3,0 0ifSa Male St.Pump Station Impevemen sT-T-1 81,298 1436 0,734 SUFTMal 1,ZTZ046 1,691.993 0 3.169.339 Shemof JOIMWOIks 3.055.807 318,558 3,3]Z365 SYL-TOtsI 3,055,BO7 316,5W 0 347Z365 COMPLETED PROPERTY PLANT&EMIR, Land and Property Rights 0 0 CoMedlon Unes and Pump Stns. 19.379.710 19,3y9,710 Tma0nenl FacliMes 0 0 Disposal Facilities 0 0 General Plats and Admin.Facll. 8.747 6,742 Equity In Joint Treatment Facil. 4Z240,958 (17.379) a 42,223,99 Other Assets at Cost Less Amgrt 0 0 Thal Property Plant&Equip. 65,960,5a8 2.191.172 0 68,151,70 V CAP?ALOUI YNEVOLV MM SCNEOULE a-1 SUMMARY OF JOSN7 WORKS CONSMCAONRE0UME WS Page 1 of 4 FISCAL YEAR 199695 3 MONTNS ENDEO WJQW Prepared By: Bill Aldridge Ill (2) (3) 12) + (31 (11-131 MEMO WORK REVISED TOTAL REQUIRED ACCUMULATE CURRENT YEAR PROJECT UNEXPENDED COMPLETED JOBS ORDER PROJECT EST BUDGET COST OUTLAY COST BUDGET TRANSFER TO 1994.95 1984-95 @ 6130/94 TO 9130/94 TO DATE FIXED ASSETS A.Reclamation Plant 1 New and Rebudgeted Maim Projects: 1.Secondary Trmt Expansion to 80 MGD,Pi-36 5371.7.0 41.600,00D 1,750,000 3,566.502 42,916 3.609.418 1.707,084 2. Electrification of Pump Drives,P1-36-/ 53717-A 1,720,000 1,200,000 161.280 170,820 332,100 1.029.180 3.Secondary Treatment Expansion, P1-36-2 53717-8 490,000 400,000 26,129 17.367 43,496 382.633 4.Primary Treatment 72 MGO Expansion.P1.37 53719-0 28,625,OD0 1.000,000 141,273 13.396 154,669 986.604 S.Security&Landscaping, P1 38-1 521M-F 1.700.000 1.0UD,000 743,293 224,418 957,711 775,582 6.Misc.Mods.Pdodry Elements P1-38-2 5210 -G 51000.000 2.50%000 2,657,416 690,064 3.347,480 1,809,936 7.Misc.Modifications Pt-38.4 521M-H 3,325,000 2,000000 930.066 1IZ459 1,042,525 1,887,541 S.Fee Protection,Signage and Water Dist.Mods.,P1-3&5 52108-J 3,200,000 1.000,000 360,056 5,052 373,1O8 994,948 9.Elect Facility Modilns&Safety Upgradas,Pl.40.1 52187-A 3,830,000 5001000 59,057 17,173 76.230 482,827 10.Fee Mullins&Safety Upgrades.P140.2 52197-B 5.025,000 50Q,000 244.148 35,840 279.994 464,154 If.Prim Clarifiers 3,4&5 Rehab. P1.41 52199-A 2,5601000 5001000 91.128 36,567 127.695 463,433 Transfer to Project Below 110010001 (1001O110) Clarifier Dome Rehab at Reclamctlon MI 1.P1-41-1 52199-C 100,000 613 792 1,405 99.208 12.Solana Retrofit of Non-Structure Systems,Pt-43 52229-A 4,760.000 2,000,000 110,473 1,8M 112,317 1,998,156 13.Seismic Retrofit Structual,Pt-44-1,2.3 52125-8 8.400,000 11600,000 778,467 103,733 882,200 1.696,267 14.Chemical and Waslehauler Facility Modif rs,P1 46 52239-A 1,920.000 1,000.000 281,560 15,532 297,092 984.468 16. 12KV Distribution System for Support Facilities,P1 47 52256-0 2,280,000 2,000,000 1.364 1B,743 20,107 1,981,257 16.Misc Architectural&Treatment Pit ImpwmU,Pt-48 52268-0 1,870,000 1,000,000 62,329 10,091 72,420 989.909 17.Miscellaneous Projects,P1-49 5,460,000 250,000 250.000 18.40 MOD Oxygen Activated Sludge&DAF's 65.463,000 1 S.Belt Presses(4 Unils) 14,300,000 20.Solids Storage 14 Sins) 10,177,000 21. Digesters: 2 @ 110'Diameter 9,100,000 22. 12kv Electrical Power Distribution 2,477.000 23.Emergency Sewage Bypass System 1,922,000 24.Remove Trickling Filter. 1 &3 113001000 25.Misc.Job Plan Projects (See Schedule CI 27,125,000 11000.000 18,591 2,487 21,178 997.513 0 26.Other Master Plan Projects a.Headworks No. 1 Retread.2003 14,950,000 b. Headworks No.2 lmpelh il'amp Speed.2016 2,600,000 c. Remove Trickling Filters 2&4, 2007 1,300,000 d.40 Mgd Oxygen Act'd Sludge&DAF. 2017 34,000,000 a. 110' It Digesters.2003&2012 16,200.000 1.4 Belt Presses-2004 10,920,000 1. 12 KV Power Distribution.2001.2012 11099,000 In. Standby Power Generation,2006&2015 4,914,000 1. 72 legal Primary Treatment, 2004&2012 32,500.000 SUB-TOTAL -RECLAMATION PLANT I 373,672,000 21,400.000 1 10,241.845 1,519,3001 11.761,1451 19,800.700 0 CAAMAL OUTLAY REVOLVLNO FUND SCNEDULE S.I SUMMARY OF JOMT WORSS CDNS7RUCTION REDUMEMENTS Page 2 of 4 FISCAL YEAR 1994-W 3 MONTHS ENDED*30/94 Ill (2) (3) 121 + 13) Itj-131 MEMO WORN REVISED TOTAL REQUIRED ACCUMULATE CURRENT YEAR PROJECT UNEXPENDED COMPLETED JOBS ORDER PROJECT EST BUDGET COST OUTLAY COST BUDGET TRANSFER TO 1994-95 189495 @ 6/30/94 TO 9/30194 TO DATE FIXED ASSETS B.Plant 2 New and Rebudgeled Melon Projects: 1.Support Facilities and Site Improvements a.Operations Building.P2-23.5.1 53715-O,A 3.175.000 550,000 2.761.789 131,051 2.892,840 41e,949 12.935) b.Warehouse Building.P2-35-2 61813-H 3.130.000 2,000,000 247.075 34,198 281,273 1.965,802 c.Maintenance Building,P2-36.3 61813-F 3,600,000 2,000.000 208,039 26,263 234,302 1.973.737 d.Phase 11 Site&Security imp..P2.35.5 61813-E 2,476,000 1,300,000 120.021 23,721 143.742 1,276.279 e.Construction Management Office, M-04411`2.36.41 51813-G 535.000 250,000 105.846 53,122 248,968 196,879 2.Rehab 7 Digesters-P239.1.2.3 52045-0 11,1O0,0D0 600,000 418,569 13.220 431,789 506,780 3.Primary Treatment 24 MOD Expansion,P2-41 5371" 14,300,000 4,597 4,597 4.Secondary Treatment Expansion,P2.42.2 53718-0,13 17.90D.000 5,000,000 11,124.997 741,962 11,866,969 4.259,038 S.Priority Misc.Mod..P2.43.1 52108.6 6.350.000 700,000 4.055.359 340,754 4,402,113 353.246 6.Misc.Modifications.P2-43.3 52108-E 2,150,000 1,350.000 722,65E 300.735 1.023.393 1,049.265 7.Mormor/CoMrol System.P2.44 52094-0 7.230.000 2,700.000 2,036,578 8,345 2,046.923 2,691.655 S.Fire Protection.Sign.&Water Dist.Medlin,P2-46 52176-0 4,780,000 2.600,00D 257.239 10,635 267,974 2,489.365 9.Elactl Fee Medlin 6 Safety Upgrades,P247-1 52189-A 4,050,000 1,600,000 54,440 10.829 65.269 1,489,171 10.F..Modiim&Safety Upgrades,P247-2 62169.E 4,610.000 2,000,000 247.332 32,602 279.934 1.967,398 11.Primary Cariflar Rehab. P2-48 52199.8.E 6,630.00D 116001000 129.034 29,869 158.703 1.470.331 12.Selmic Retrofit of Non-Structure Systems.P2-50 52229.8 5,200,000 2,000,000 149,673 13.348 163.021 1,986.652 13.Seismic Retrofit Structural P2.63-2.3.4,5,E 52108-C 11,360.000 2,50DODO 2,880.310 53,244 2.933.554 2,446,756 14.Chemlcal and Plant Water Modlfna,P2.55 52239-9 2.6GO,000 2.000.000 178,598 11,564 190,162 1,988,436 15.Mi.S.Nmic'ldodif c,&Flare Impruyana.M.,P2.66 52269.0 250,OOD 160.01:10 17,434 1.336 18.770 140,664 16.Mlseellaneoua Project,P2-57 512601000 250.000 250,000 17.Solids Storage: 2 Bins 5.200,000 18.Additional 105 Foot Digester 3,900,000 19.Plant Water Pump Station 1.170.000 20.Misc.Job Pan Projects 1See Schedule 01 27.250.000 1.0001000 24.551 49,059 74.410 950.141 0 21.Other Master Plan Projects a.Replace Pdmery Means A.B.C.200E 11,700,000 b.Standby Power Generation, 2005&2015 10,000,000 c.Monitoring and Control System.2005 L77.�OLOIDO 0000 SUB-TOTAL -TREATMENT PLANT 2 5,000 31,850,000 25,836,139 1.892,457 27,728,596 29,957,543 12.9351 C.Water Reclamation Regional Expansion 400,000 400,000 Transfer to Project.Below 1.8001 1220.466j 0 (220.4881 Reclmation Plant No. 1 Water Quality Management Study 58231-0608 BOB 0 OCSDAJCWD Regional Water Reclamation Rent SWtly 52133-E3,004 10.]95 13,]88 0 Reclamation Plant 3 Preliminary Sludias&Feasibility Report 52133-A552.10] 2.283 554.370 207.430 SUB-TOTAL- WATER RECLAMATION REGIONAL EXPANSION 0.000 400,000 555,719 13.058 688,7]7 386.942 0 CAP/TAL OUTLAY REVOL VBYO FUND SCHEDULE B I SUMMARY OF JOINT WORKS CONSIRUCIMN REQUIREMENTS Page 3 of 4 FISCAL YEAR 1994.95 3 MONTHS ENDED 91301W (1) 12) (3) 121 + (31 I1)-131 MEMO WORK REVISED TOTAL REQUIRED ACCUMULATE CURRENT YEAR PROJECT UNEXPENDED COMPLETED JOBS ORDER PROJECT EST BUDGET COST OUTLAY COST BUDGET TRANSFER TO 1994-95 1994-95 @ 6/30196 1 TO 9/30194 TO DATE FIXED ASSETS D. InUmlanl and Joint Facilitef 1.Support Facilities and Site Improvements a.Demolition of OM Lab.J-11.1 52083-A 400.000 250,000 8.301 18,390 26.691 231.610 b.Monitoring&Control System.J-23-2&J-31 53712-BI52215-0 7.025,000 2,200.0OD 2,656,390 570,483 3.225.881 1,629,517 c.Personnel Building at Pit 1,J-26 537160 1,310,000 400,000 141.168 21.133 162,301 378.867 d.3-Story Admin Annex at Old Lab Site.J-30 520834) 3.110,000 107,652 107,652 6.Demolition of Old Control Center 100,000 I.Demeanor,of Support Bldg.@P2,J-27 52084-0 250,000 50,000 90,374 16,390 108.764 31.610 g.Central Lab Expansion J-17-2,3 52257.0 708,DO0 100,000 87,377 39,697 127.074 60,303 Transfer to Project Below (27.4671 127.4671 Parch&load of Racks to Secure Gas Cylinders&Dewar 52293.0 27,461 27,467 15,749 15,749 11,718 2.Oulfall&Booster Pump Stations a.Surge Tower Replacement,J-34-1 52241-0 6.600,000 2,GO0,0p0 574,812 56,691 631.503 1,943,309 b.Outall Reliability&Pumping Annex OOBS'C' 31.0851000 c.Eel&Real 78-to Deep Water w/120'Outfall 51,269,000 100.000 1001000 3.Computerized Fac.Records and Dwg.Sys.J-26.1 58216.0 2.7001000 750,000 195,662 4.213 199.875 745.787 4.Elacll.Power Systems Rehab. Studies J-25.2 58216-A 2,970,000 300,000 6,807 6,807 300.000 5.Coneclion System Mapping 100,000 100,000 100,000 6.TelePhone/Telemetry Monitoring Exp.J-28 521460 400,000 25,000 233,551 233.551 25.000 (233,5511 7.Standby Power Reliability Modins,J-33 52240-0 6.390,000 500.000 362,098 23,344 375,442 476,656 6.Suchard Interplant Trunk Replacement 31,000,pp0 9.Sludge Disposal Profects a.Compost Demonstration Plant 9.0001000 b.Lend Acquisition 22,000,000 c.Landfill Dayelopment Phan I 26,600,0G0 d.Compost Facility 50,OD0,000 13.District Information Management Network a. Maint. &Door Mgmnt Computer System 52149-A 250,000 250,000 727,790 14.079 741,869 235.921 (20,2991 b.Lab Information Management System Upgrades 52149.8 375,000 275,000 31,808 11965 33.773 273.035 c.Financial Information System 52149-C 1.150,001) 750,000 312,733 1103,66(T 209,073 863,660 (12.1901 d. Network System Integration 820.000 340,000 340,000 e.CO-Optical Data Archiving 75,000 50,000 50000 1. CAP/rAL OUTNYREVOLV/NO FUND SCHEDULES-1 SUMMARY OF JOW WORKS CONSTRUCTION REQUIR MENTS Page 4 of 4 FISCAL YEAR 199496 3 MONTHS ENDED 9/30490 (1) 121 3) 121 + (3) 111-(3) MEMO WORK REVISED TOTAL REQUIRED ACCUMULATE CURRENT YEAR PROJECT UNEXPENDED COMPLETED JOBS ORDER PROJECT EST BUDGET COST OUTLAY COST BUDGET TRANSFER TO 1994.95 199495 ®SM0194 TO 9/30/94 TO DATE FIXED ASSETS 11.In-Plant Sampling System Modlfn 140,000 140,000 140.000 12.Other Master Plan Projects a.Sludge Disp.Landfill Phase 112011 1516001000 b.Sludge Disp.Equip Phase I&11 2001 11,500,000 c.Electrical Power Distribution, 12kv 2.707.000 13. We.Job Plan Project. IS..Schodulo EI 19,026 000 1,000 000 87,074 6,873 92,747 994,327 11,128) SUB-TOTAL INTERPLANT&JOINT 305,684,467 9,580.000 5,612.605 686,147 6,298.752 8.893.853 1267,1681 SU8-TOTAL - MAJOR PROJECTS 930.681,467 63,230.000 42,246,308 4.110,962 46,357,270 59.119.038 (270,103) E.Spacial Projects Studies Research&Development 1.Action Plan: a. NPDES Permit Appllcation) 58209-F 425,000 60,000 393,680 3,914 397.694 46.086 b. NPDES Permit IMonitoring Changes) 100.000 50,000 501000 2.Solids Treatment. Disposal and Reuse 111501000 /50.000 150,000 Transfer to Project Below 0 0 Sludge Disposal Related Projects 58214�0 258.431 760 259.191 (760) 3.Air Quality Control Program e.Toxic$and ROD Control: Blolllter R&D 58227.0 300,000 260,000 135,991 46.763 182,734 203,247 b.Air Emissions:Source Control Feasibility Study 50,000 50,000 50,000 c.SCAOMD Rule 431.1:5ulfur Control&CEMS 100,000 1c%= 100,000 d. SCAQMD Rule 1402:Air Teens 200,000 200,000 200.000 a.Air Quality Management Implementation Plan BB232-0 375,000 275,000 13,113 4,595 17,708 270,405 I.Parameter Monitoring System for Con Gen 58235.0 400,000 30%0DD 1,902 298,098 g.A.O.Database Development 75,000 60.000 50,000 4. 2020 VISION Master Plan Update 3,103.000 100.000 1001000 SUB-TOTAL-SPECIAL PROJECTS 6,270,000 1,575,000 001,205 57.924 857.227 1,517.076 0 F.Equipment Items 53,225,000 310001000 2,028,535 328,601 2.957,136 2.671.399 12,166,97]I SUBTOTAL-JOINT WORKS CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS 990,194,467 67,805,000 45.676.048 4.497.487 60,1]1.833 63,307,513 12.439,OB01 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS COMPLETED AT 6130/94 SCNEOULE F 111,188,042 452,290 111.640.332 (452,290) 1108,457.8601 TOTAL JOINT WORKS CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS 990/B4 467 67.805,000 156 664,090 4949,777 161,811.965 62,855,223 1108.896.9401 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING AGENDA FOR DECEMBER 14, 1994 Agenda Item (12)(a): Minutes of the executive committee (1) Receive and file draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on November 2, 1994. (2) Receive and file draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on November 3, 1994. (3) Receive and fie draft Finance and Personnel Committee Minutes for the meeting held on November 16, 1994, (4) Receive and file draft Executive Subcommittee Minutes for the meeting held on November 29, 1994. �..� (5) Receive and file draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on November 30, 1994. (6) Receive and file draft Executive Committee Minutes for the meeting held on November 30, 1994. Summary See attached draft minutes. Recommendation Receive and file draft minutes listed above. wpdwWrec .t]a , uCounty SanitationDistricts � N of Orange County, California P.O. Box 8127 a 10844 Blis Avenue DRAFT Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714) 962-2411 MINUTES OF THE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE NOVEMBER 2, 1994 - 5:30 PM A regular meeting of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services (OMTS) Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on November 2, 1994 at 5:30 PM at the Districts' Administrative Offices. The roll was called and a quorum declared present as follows: OMTS COMMITTEE: STAFF PRESENT: Present Pat McGuigan, Chair Blake P. Anderson, General Manager Victor Leipzig, Vice Chair Gary Streed, Director of Finance i Fred Barrera Ed Hodges, Assistant Director of Maintenance John C. Cox Bob Ooten, Assistant Director of Operations Barry Denes Charles Egigian Nichols, Conservation, Norman Z. Eckenrode Recycle & Reuse Manager James M. Ferryman Ed Torres, Air Quality Manager Thomas E. Lutz Mark Esquer, Operations Ted R. Moreno Sal A. Sapien Peer A. Swan Daniel T. Welch Absent Other Carry Nelson Bill Mills, OCWD Phil Sansone Tracy A. Worley Minutes of the OMTS Committee November 2, 1994 Page 2 of 8 AGENDA ITEM (4A) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chairman welcomed everyone and thanked Director Victor Leipzig, Committee Vice Chairman, for leading the first meeting. AGENDA ITEM (4B) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager commented on a facilitated meeting he and key staff members attended with EPA in San Francisco on Friday, October 28, on the renewal of our NPDES permit 301(h) waiver application. The discussions centered on the details of the permit, in particular, the limitations for effluent suspended solids, the major measurement for quality of wastewater discharges. It appears that EPA is now taking a wider view than in the past when reviewing permits, including minimizing total environmental impacts, rather than focusing on water quality only. Among the goals to be considered is resource and cost effectiveness. Additional meetings will be held to discuss the many facets of the permit. The next meeting with EPA is scheduled in late November to keep the process moving. The General Manager also reported that on Monday, October 31, 1994, the federal government issued a restraining order against disposal of additional biosolids at the Thermal, California site, which is used by one of the Districts' biosolids disposal contractors, Pima Gro. This was done in an attempt to cool down the situation. As a result, our two contractors are now hauling all of our biosolids out of state. This will have a direct cost impact which will be addressed at a later date by this committee. The General Manager asked Ed Hodges, Director of Maintenance, to present information on a money-saving initiative concerning a pressure indicator device. The engine manufacturer has recommended the indicators be replaced. The eight Central Generation System engines use 116 pressure indicators. The manufacturer quotes cost at $1,248 each with 30 weeks delivery. Staff have been able to have the indicators built locally for less cost and shorter delivery. The local manufacturer's cost is $285.00 with delivery in four weeks. Savings are estimated to be over $120,000. Directors asked about corrosion, patent concerns, warranty, sealants, etc. All issues are resolvable. AGENDA (5) APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF OCTOBER 5. 1994 MEETING The minutes of the October 5, 1994 meeting were approved with the addition of a comment from Director Sapien reminding the Committee that he suggested that the Committee not micro-manage the staff. Minutes of the OMTS Committee November 2, 1994 Page 3 of 8 AGENDA (6) OVERVIEW OF ORANGE COUNTY'S WATER SUPPLY, WATER RECYCLING PERSPECTIVES, AND AN INTRODUCTION TO THE ORANGE COUNTY REGIONAL WATER RECLAMATION PROJECT - BILL MILLS & SLAKE ANDERSON The report was presented by General Manager Anderson, and the Orange County Water Districts (OCWD) General Manager, Bill Mills. General Manager Anderson reported that water reclamation had been a reality at the two districts since the early 1970's. The 1989 Master Plan focused on three sites. No progress has been made due to site acquisition problems, high cost ($1,200 to $1,400 per-acre-foot). Water reclamation requires four items, 1) a treatment plant, 2) a distribution system, 3) able users (plumbed to use reclaimed water), and 4) willing users (an agreement to use reclaimed water at a price and a quality). In 1993, the two agencies conceived the idea to treat the water at our facilities in Fountain Valley, pump the water to the Anaheim Forebay, and use the groundwater supply as a distribution system. Staff jointly worked on a feasibility study during 1994, which has been completed. General Manager Mills presented data on the need for more water in Southern California, our present shrinking water supplies, potential water supply augmentation from water reclamation and environmental support for water reclamation. He noted that Orange County presently leads the rest of the state in water reclamation. He further noted that the OCWD has successfully reduced the cost of the reverse osmosis process used in Water Factory 21 treatment. General Manager Mills stated that there are hundreds of present water reclamation projects including irrigation projects in operation which are safe but capital intensive and that the Santa Ana River baseflow which is presently percolated into the ground is at present almost all reclaimed water. General Manager Mills discussed the main concepts of the Orange County Regional Water Reclamation Project (OCRWRP). Wastewater would be treated at both plants, transported up a 15-mile, six-foot diameter pipe along the right-of-way of the Santa Ana River and percolated into the ground at the Anaheim Forebay ground water recharge facilities owned and operated by OCWD. Wastewater enterprise zones with possible tax incentives could be created along the pipeline to attract industries that need reliable water supplies. General Manager Mills noted that river pipeline route will decrease construction costs and environmental impacts. The percolation system has the rapacity to accept the water most of the year. Space for additional percolation is available if required or desired. General Manager Mills estimated �./ an additional 20 acres would cover all percolation needs year round. Minutes of the OMTS Committee November 2, 1994 Page 4 of 8 The proposed treatment facilities to be located in Fountain Valley at the two Districts' present treatment plant sites include modifications to secondary treatment process, microfiltration, reverse osmosis and disinfection. Microfiltration is a key OCWD process that is being developed for application by the OCWD staff for reclamation projects. The process has great potential to further reduce reverse osmosis costs. A comparison of the OCRWRP, Colorado River, State Project Water and Santa Ana River quality parameters was presented. Water quality projections indicated that project water would be of higher quality than existing sources. Project water would also meet the areas rising demands despite a decrease in available imported water. The OCWD is seeking federal funds that may cover 25% of the project. Wastewater brine management, including a potential brine line, will be considered to help reduce operating costs of the project. As the county's population increases, additional pressure will be put on presently tenuous water supply sources. Implementation of the project will reduce dependence on imported water. OCWD's cost is competitive with the cost of imported water supplied by the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California. Costs are projected to be around $600 per-acre-foot. The project advantages are: 1) Cost effectiveness, 2) Economics can be improved, 3) Water supply reliability is improved, and 4) Provides high quality water for recharge. Project time lines were presented. Directors Pat McGuigan and Peer A. Swan suggested widespread and early community involvement. General Manager Anderson presented preliminary costs the Sanitation Districts would incur for construction of secondary and other facilities. Costs include the additional secondary treatment facilities that will be required for our ocean discharge to offset the loss of secondary effluent used for reclamation. Staff explained that for every gallon of reclaimed water used for this project, an additional half gallon of secondary treatment for ocean disposal will be required. General Manager Anderson noted that the EPA may tie reclamation to the Districts' waiver. The Districts presently save an estimated $50 million per year in O&M costs by having a waiver. Minutes of the OMTS Committee November 2, 1994 Page 5 of 8 Director Dan Welch requested information on costs and rate increases to provide additional facilities for reclamation. Staff indicated that as cost figures are developed this information will be presented to the Directors as part of their deliberations. Joint Chairman John C. Cox noted staff needs to look at the whole picture. There is likely to be a rate hike for all projects. Gary Streed, Director of Finance, noted the Districts' user fees at 2010 were projected to be a $200 residence in 2020 VISION, but are currently projected to be $115 per residence. Director Swan noted that our fees are less than those at LACSD and San Diego and that we need to protect the 301(h) waiver and that water costs are going to be borne by Orange County residents. Director Swan noted that the 1989 Master Plan committed the Districts to provide and pay for secondary treatment to support. He noted that this project costs are significantly below the $1,200 - $1,400 per-acre-foot staff had estimated reclamation at a new site would cost. Director Swan noted that the Districts took the reclamation charge on in the 1989 Master Plan, hence are already committed to the secondary treatment portion of the costs. AGENDA (7) TOUR OF BIOFILTRATION RESEARCH PILOT PROJECT - ED TORRES ... The Directors and staff were provided a tour of the pilot project research facilities. Ed Torres answered many questions from the Directors. AGENDA (8) CONSIDERATION OF PHASE III BIOTRICKLING FILTER DEMONSTRATION PROJECT - ED TORRES Ed Torres, Air Quality Manager, provided an overview of the first two phases of the Biofiltration Research project. The Phase I work demonstrated that the project will remove odorous compounds and volatile organic compounds (VOC). The estimated VOC reduction averages 70%. The project is currently trying to optimize treatment time which will reduce capital costs and unit size. The best performing media materials are yard waste compost and granular-activated carbon. Two larger pilot units are providing additional testing on these two media. Torres noted that the biofilters have the potential to clean air at 20% to 30% of the present scrubber costs. Torres reported on proposed new research on biotrickling filters. Director Swan asked if these biofilters would remove the Districts from the top five stationary source air pollution emissions list. He wanted us to get off that list. Torres reported that we previously were in the top five for carbon monoxide emissions but that we are no longer on the list due to the startup of central generation engines. Director Swan asked about the potential to sell J Minutes of the OMITS Committee November 2, 1994 Page 6 of 8 \/ emission credits. The issue of selling or leasing emission reduction credits for reactive organic gases (ROGs), and its relationship to RECLAIM was discussed. Torres indicated that we could bank ROG emissions if we installed biofilters and reduced emissions without being required to under regulations. Torres noted the Districts' Air Quality Division is developing an Air Quality Master Plan. Staff will do Phase I. A consultant will assist staff with Phase II. Torres reviewed Phases I and II biofilter and Phase III biotrickling project schedules and previous Boards authorizations. He requested authorization to add biotrickling filter research that may offer capital cost savings by treating the air in the Districts' trickling filters or in existing packed tower scrubbers. The EPA has "committed" $75,000 through SCAOMD to support the $90,000 project, although the agreement paperwork has not been completed. The $15,000 will be used from unspent funds from Phase II of the project for a total estimated cost of $90,000. Motion by Director Swan to approve all items of the Phase III biotrickling filter project request. Vote was unanimous. Director Leipzig asked if the research should proceed without the EPA's $75,000 contribution. Torres noted he would recommend proceeding with the research without EPA's monetary support. Torres noted that we have a letter from SCAQMD stating that EPA will fund this project and that staff is recommending that we proceed with the research before a contract is in place between the Districts and SCAQMD. The Directors agreed with our recommendation. AGENDA (9) CONSIDERATION OF ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH K. P. LINDSTROM, INC. FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SERVICES - BLAKE ANDERSON General Manager Anderson noted Lindstrom's value to the Districts with his experience with all West Coast agencies who have a waiver. He recommended an increase in Mr. Lindstrom's present contract from $207,500 to $503,000. Director McGuigan noted Mr. Lindstrom would, at times, have to be fully focused on Districts' work to utilize the hours proposed. General Manager Anderson noted Mr. Lindstrom is available 24-hours-a-day, and often times will focus exclusively on only Districts' work. Director Sapien moved approval. Director Barry Denes seconded the motion. Director Denes asked if any staff can do any of this work to decease costs. General Minutes of the OMTS Committee November 2, 1994 �.r Page 7 of 8 Manager Anderson noted Mr. Lindstrom's work supplements staff work. Motion was carried unanimously. AGENDA (10) CONSIDERATION OF BIOSOLIDS MANAGEMENT CONTRACTS - CHARLES EGIGIAN NICHOLS Charles Egigian Nichols, Conservation, Recycle & Reuse Division Manager, provided an update on solids disposal issues at the Thermal composting site. A protest from several groups began two weeks ago at the site. A civil complaint has been lodged alleging the site has no federal permit and that there are nuisances, and seeking a restraining order and damages. A hearing has been set for November 28. If the restraining order is successful, no new solids will be admitted to the site, although the existing contractors can finish their present work. Egigian Nichols noted all Districts' biosolids are going to Arizona. For now we are paying $38.00 per ton to Pima Gro and $33.95 per ton to Ag Tech. Director Fred Barrera asked if the Indian claim to the land was valid. Director McGuigan asked how many POTWs were using the site. Answer - eight. The large pile of solids at the site came from San Diego who did not properly monitor their contractors' activities. San Diego is not currently using this site. Districts' staff closely monitor our contractors' activities. Director Welch asked about rail transport potential. A Request for Proposal (RFP) will be coming out later that may address rail transport. A discussion on the industry standard followed with Egigian Nichols concluding a three-to-five-year term was his preference. In the upcoming RFP, there will be provisions for longer term contracts to determine if it would be cost-effective for the Districts. AGENDA (11) DISCUSSION OF DIRECTORS' COMMITTEE NOTEBOOK - BLAKE ANDERSON General Manager Anderson discussed the new handbook and asked for feedback on the various styles. The book will include all committees, to make it a complete reference book. Director Welch asked for a one-page "sell" sheet to include: the 301(h) waiver savings, no fee hikes, electricity production, and solids production savings for use in discussion with public. Performance indicators and performance trends should also be summarized. General Manager Anderson noted the one-page summary and benchmark parameters will be planned over the next couple of months. Minutes of the OMTS Committee November 2, 1994 Page 8 of 8 — AGENDA (12) PRESENTATION ON WASTEWATER FLOW TRENDS - BOB OOTEN Ooten reported that flow and regulations determine what will be built for the Districts' conveyance, treatment and disposal facilities. Orange County has historically experienced rapid growth and growth is projected to continue. Flow projections are developed based on historical flow data, city and county land use projections and SCAG population forecasts. The 1989 Master Plan (2020 VISION) contains flow projections through the year 2020. The 1989 Master Plan projects future average daily flow and peak flow. The average daily flow determines the treatment plant facilities that must be built to be able to treat the wastewater to remain in compliance. The peak flow determines the maximum size of the pipes and treatment facilities to convey the maximum amount of water storm events produce. Two impacts have occurred since the 1989 Master Plan that have revised the 2020 VISION estimates of future flow - the continuing draught which has lowered the long-term average daily flow and a December 1992 storm event which caused an increase in the peak hour to average daily flow ratio. The Master Plan flow average daily flow projection and the reduced current average daily flow projection, considering the drought impact, is shown in the attached figure (attachment 1). The second storm event in fifteen years to have a peak to average ratio above two has caused staff and consultants to increase the ratio to 2.15. The projected Master Plan peak flows and the new lower peak flows are attached (attachment 2). Director Swan and other Directors asked staff to perform a study to try to understand where rainwater gets into the sewers. If nonstructural methods of reducing peak flows can be found, the large capital cost of another ouffall might be able to be delayed. Staff noted that the studies of results are sometimes elusive and the difficulty of being properly prepared when a significant storm event occurs. Adjournment The OMTS Committee adjourned at approximately 8:20 PM. RJO:ahh REF #min.114 Attachments (2) *ft./ County Sanitation Districts of Orange County AVERAGE DAILY WASTEWATER FLOW PROJECTION 1989 MASTER PLAN 400 399 MGD 350 - ................ - - �1-`t.- 360MGD Flo - U 300 0 250 w 200 z --lQR0UG +T-- ............. 150 O .......... 100 .................. -------...... 50 - 0 1981 1984 1987 1990 1993 1996 1999 2002 2005 2008 2011 2014 2017 2020 YEARS VMQ=ATANWDMLY.K0 NO:W 11,2N4 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County PROJECTED PEAK FLOW 800 j 768 MGD 740 MGD 700 - QKjo auE�GOF) (7 I cs�00 FAKS0 P i 2r LA15 600 ....---.. ....._ _-...----.-.. .. --- ro tERP� GbG .... -j 1600 98g MPS Gs i 4-5:MGD i II 400 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 YEARS V WG9�DAT/i1PF.N(FLOM VN$ q.p',ptl 11ItM II County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California P.O. Box 8127•10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 DRAFT Telephone: (714) 962-2411 II MINUTES OF PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE November 3, 1994 at 5:30 p.m. A regular meeting of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13, and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Wednesday, November 3, 1994 at 5:30 p.m., at the Districts' Administrative Office. The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: PLANNING. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT: John Collins, Chair John Shaw, Rourke, Woodruff Jim Wahner, Vice Chair & Spradlin John Cox Bill Mills, Orange County Water Don Griffin District �.i Richard Partin Bill Knopf, John Carollo Jim Potts Engineers Sheldon Singer Jamel Demir, John Carollo Peer Swan Engineers Charles Sylvia George Zlaket STAFF PRESENT: Blake P. Anderson, General Manager ABSENT: John D. Linder, Director of Barry Hammond Engineering Bill Mahoney Bob Ooten, Director of Operations Linda Moulton-Patterson Gary Streed, Director of Finance Miguel Pulido Jack Vincent, Planning and Margie Rice Design Manager Dennis May, Engineering Project Manager Jim Harris, Engineering Project Manager Wendy Sevenandt, Engineering Project Manager Hayes Milliman, Information Services �..i Analyst Lauri Bluestein, Laboratory Manager Dan Tremblay, Laboratory Section Supervisor Minutes of Planning, Design , and Construction Committee Meeting November 3, 1994 Page 2 REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager commented on a meeting he and key staff members attended with EPA in San Francisco on Friday, October 28, on the renewal of our NPDES permit 301(h) waiver application. The discussions centered on how the permit would look and, in particular, the limitations for effluent biosolids, the major measurement for quality of wastewater discharges. It appears that EPA is now taking a wider view than in the past when reviewing permits, including minimizing total environmental impacts, rather than focusing on water quality only. Among the goals to be considered is resource and cost effectiveness. Additional meetings will be held to discuss the many facets of the permit. The next meeting with EPA is scheduled in late November to keep the process moving. The General Manager also reported that on Monday, October 31, 1994, the federal government issued a restraining order against disposal of additional biosolids at the Thermal, California site, which is used by the one of the Districts' biosolids disposal contractors, Pima Gro. This was done in an attempt to cool down the situation. As a result, our two contractors are now hauling all of our biosolids out of state and this will have a direct cost impact which will be addressed at a later date by the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING The Director of Engineering gave an update on the Operations Center Expansion project at Plant No. 2 and the contractors, Javaid Contractors, performance. Stop notices continue to be a problem, but the work is proceeding. The job is now over 200 days late, however, the contractor is due some time extension so this number will change. We will claim liquidated damages when the work is finally completed. The repair of the dome supports are being made by the original contractor. Actual samples of the supports were displayed to show the corrosion that has occurred. The Director of Engineer also displayed a copy of a pamphlet that has been prepared by our Public Information Officer. This is a new format and will be followed for all new construction projects in the collection system. The Chair asked that these be made available to the Directors at the next Joint Board meeting. -2- Minutes of Planning, Design and Construction Committee Meeting November3, 1994 Page 3 STAFF OVERVIEW OF DISTRICTS' PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES The Director of Engineering introduced staff members who would be making presentations on the action items on the agenda. The General Manager discussed the history of water reclamation at the Districts since the 1989 Master Plan was approved. Water reclamation requires four items: 1) a treatment plant; 2) a distribution system; 3) able users (plumbed to use reclaimed water); and 4) willing users (an agreement to use reclaimed water at a price and a quality). In 1993, the Sanitation Districts and the Orange County Water District conceived the idea of treating water at the Sanitation Districts' facilities in Fountain Valley, pump the water to the Anaheim Forebay, and use the ground as a distribution system. Staff worked jointly on a feasibility study during 1994, which is on-going. Mr. Anderson then introduced Bill Mills, General Manager of the Orange County Water District, who gave a presentation on the Orange County Regional Water Reclamation Project. This is a joint project between the Sanitation Districts and the OCWD that is envisioned to provide reclaimed water to supplement the diminishing groundwater supply. Orange County does more reclamation than any other county in California. New technology has driven down the costs of additional treatment required to meet drinking water standards to new lows with higher quality water. Enterprise zones (with attendant tax incentives) could be created to attract industries to convert industrial areas to using reclaimed water. The main distribution line would be underground and follow the Santa Ana River alignment to take advantage of the underground storage basins, which would provide storage capacity, as well as minimize construction and environmental impacts. The costs of additional treatment required beyond secondary for the OCWR project, in 1994 dollars, is estimated to be $282,000,000. Some federal funding has been identified. Wastewater salinity may be managed in the future to reduce the amount of reverse osmosis treatment required. Groundwater recovery programs can adversely impact wastewater salinity. There are two desalting projects in operation, with two more in construction, and the brine from those facilities will be collected and transported to the Districts' Santa Ana River Interceptor, and eventually to the Districts for treatment. -3- Minutes of Planning, Design and Construction Committee Meeting November 3, 1994 Page 4 The reliability of future water supply would be greatly increased with this project because there would be less reliance on importing MWD water, which appears to have decreasing supplies annually due to decisions regarding Bay-Delta, Colorado River and Sierra-derived water supplies. When completed, this project will be the largest water reclamation project in the world. The proposed schedule calls for adoption of the final feasibility study in February 1995. A very extensive public involvement program would follow with environmental documentation proceeding concurrently. Continued technical and economic evaluation would occur in 1995. By January 1996 design would be started with construction scheduled for late-1997. Desalination was discussed and to date the high cost ($2,000/acre-foot produced) is the major impediment. The General Manager discussed the Districts' role in providing, in phases, up to 140 million gallons per day of wastewater to the OCWD for reclamation. As more water is diverted to OCWD for reclamation, the quality of the effluent to the ocean will be reduced below our ocean discharge permit requirements of 50% secondary treatment. This will result in additional capital costs to the Districts for increasing secondary treatment capacity. The feasibility study will address capital and operating costs in greater detail. Director Potts suggested that some of the savings, which have resulted from not being required to treat the effluent to secondary level, be used for educating the public before the project is finalized so that the benefits will be known and understood when it is presented for approval. Bill Mills indicated that $140,000 in federal funds have been made available and this is a viable use for it. Chair Collins mentioned the possibility of staff addressing local service clubs on this issue. This has been discussed by Districts' and OCWD public information officers, and is being done upon request. The public relations aspect of the project will be addressed in the feasibility report and at a future meeting of the Committee. Director Swan mentioned that funding would be a major concern, and now is the time to start seeking support from the various agencies when it is available. The 1989 Master Plan and 2020 Vision both stated that reclamation was a major element and the Districts will support this project. The final feasibility report will be made available to the Directors in February. In 1995, staff will be refining the feasibility report and working on costs and budgets. -4- Minutes of Planning, Design and Construction Committee Meeting November 3, 1994 Page 5 STATUS REPORT ON PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS The Director of Engineering presented the procedures of the Engineering Department and suggested recommended changes pertaining to Professional Services Agreements, addenda to same, and approval of construction documents. The General Manager indicated that state law allows discretion up to $50,000; the policy within the Districts is $25,000. Professional Services Agreements The Committee agreed to the changes in concept for Professional Services Agreements, and Chair Collins directed staff to formalize the proposed changes and resubmit in policy form at the December Planning, Design and Construction meeting, with limits as follows: • Agreements to $25,000 shall require General Manager approval. • Agreements over $25,000 and to $50,000 shall be approved by the Planning, Design and Construction Committee. • Agreements over $50,000 shall be approved by the Planning, Design and Construction Committee and submitted to the Boards of Directors for approval. Addenda to Professional Services Aoreements The Committee agreed to the changes in concept for Addenda to Professional Services Agreements, and Chair Collins directed staff to formalize the proposed changes and resubmit in policy form at the next meeting, with limits as follows: • Separate items to $25,000 shall require General Manager approval. • Separate items over$25,000 and to $50,000 shall be approved by the Planning, Design and Construction Committee. • Items over $50,000, and over 5% of gross add shall be approved by the Planning, Design and Construction Committee and submitted to the Boards of Directors for approval. A quarterly report will be prepared to show percent of contract dollars and percent of events. -5- Minutes of Planning, Design and Construction Committee Meeting November 3, 1994 Page 6 Approval of Plans and Specifications. Bidding and Awarding Construction Contracts The Committee agreed to the changes in concept for plans and specifications, and bidding and awarding a construction contract, and Chair Collins directed staff to formalize the proposed changes and resubmit in policy form at the next meeting, with limits as follows: Proiects under budget: Director Potts asked that a statement from finance be included indicating that the project is within budget. This could be included in the backup information in the form of a memo or signature line on the recommendation to award. Director Griffin also asked that the Design Engineer submit an estimate confirming that the project is within budget. Projects over budget: These will be acted on by the Committee and the Boards of Directors. General Counsel indicated that under state law, in order to have design immunity, all plans and specifications must be approved by the legislative body. Change Orders to Construction Contracts The Committee agreed to the changes in concept for change orders to construction contracts, and Chair Collins directed staff to formalize the proposed changes and resubmit in policy form at the next meeting, with limits as follows: • Change orders to $25,000, and under 5% of gross add to a contract shall require General Manager approval. • Change orders over $25,000 and to $50,000, and under 10% of gross add to a contract, shall be approved by the Planning, Design and Construction Committee. • Change orders over$50,000, or over 10% of gross add to a contract, shall be approved by the Planning, Design and Construction Committee and submitted to the Boards of Directors for approval. If a change order includes an extension of contract time, staff may be requested to equate the days to dollars. -6- Minutes of Planning, Design and Construction Committee Meeting November 3, 1994 Page 7 Change Order Report Format: The Director of Engineering reviewed the draft Change Order Report form. After discussion, it was requested that the form be revised to add columns for % project complete, and % time expended. The dollar amounts will be addressed as: this change, orig. contract price, previously authorized changes, adjusted contract price Only those projects that have changes for that month will be reported. However, another report will be prepared that shows change order activity for the past 3, 6 and 12 months. DISCUSSION OF THE DIRECTORS HANDBOOK The Committee decided to move discussion of the handbook to a newly scheduled meeting on December 1, 1994. . i APPROVAL OF DRAFT MINUTES OF AUGUST 25, 1994 MEETING OF THE JOINT WORKS SELECTION COMMITTEE There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the August 25, 1994 meeting of the Joint Works Selection Committee, the Chair ordered that the minutes be deemed approved, as drafted. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF OCTOBER 6, 1994 MEETING There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the October 6, 1994 Engineering and Construction Committee, the Chair ordered that the minutes be deemed approved, as drafted. ADDENDA TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACTS Authorizing staff to negotiate Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Black & Veatch re Chemical and Wastehauler Facility Modifications at Plant No. 1. Job No. P146. and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-55. providing for additional design services. The Design project manager, Dennis May, presented an overview of the project and the changes which have affected the original scope of work. With Operations' -7- Minutes of Planning, Design and Construction Committee Meeting November 3, 1994 Page 8 decision to changeover to hydrogen peroxide from chlorine, the added work associated with this changeover and the delay in completing the original work, the added cost is estimated at $280,000. The construction estimate has increased from $ 2 million to $5.3 million. Staff recommended that an addendum be negotiated. Moved, seconded, and duly carried to accept staff recommendation. The negotiated agreement will be returned to the Committee at a future meeting for consideration. Approval of Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for additional construction support services re Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-38. and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-43. The Design project manager, Wendy Sevenandt, presented a briefing on the changes to the professional services agreement as a result of Districts' request for additional construction support services. Staff recommended that Addendum No. 4 be approved, providing for additional construction support services at hourly rates including labor, overhead and profit, for the additional amount of$246,680, increasing the total authorized compensation from $2,519,165 to an amount not to exceed $2,762,845. Moved, seconded, and duly carried to accept staff recommendation. The action will be presented to the Directors at the December 14, 1994 Joint Boards meeting. A copy of the Committee's certification is attached to the minutes. ACTIONS RE PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTS Approval of Change Order No. 6 to the plans and specifications for Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-2. The Director of Engineering described the changes included in this change order. Staff recommended authorizing an addition of$31,613.00 to the contract with Margate Construction, Inc. for one item of additional work, increasing the total contract amount to $14,373,504.00. Moved, seconded, and duly carried to accept staff recommendation. The action will be presented to the Directors at the December 14, 1994 Joint Boards meeting. -8- Minutes of Planning, Design and Construction Committee Meeting November3, 1994 Page 9 Consideration of actions relative Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-36-2 The Project Manager, Jim Harris, presented an overview of the project and the items before the Committee. (a) Approval of Reimbursement Agreement with Orange County Water District providing for construction of a new pump station and piping in the Job No. P1-36-2 contract. Seconded, moved, and duly carried to accept staff recommendation that the Reimbursement Agreement with Orange County Water District be approved. The action will be presented to the Directors at the December 14, 1994 Joint Boards meeting. (b) Acceptance of recommendations of Evaluation of Membrane Diffuser Manufacturers report Prepared by John Carollo Engineers re pregualifcation of suppliers. Seconded, moved, and duly carried to accept staff recommendation of the Evaluation of Membrane Diffuser Manufacturers report re accepting Sanitare, Parkson Wyss and Aercor as the only prequalified suppliers. The action will be presented to the Directors at the December 14, 1994 Joint Boards meeting. (c) Approval of Plans and specifications and any subsequent addenda, and authorize General Manager to advertise and receive bids (tentative bid date is January 10, 1995). Seconded, moved, and duly carried to accept staff recommendation for approval of plans and specifications for Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36-2. The action will be presented to the Directors at the December 14, 1994 Joint Boards meeting. (d) Authorize award of a construction contract to lowest responsive bidder in an amount not to exceed the approved budgeted amount ($45.000 000). Should the low bid be above the budgeted amount staff will seek direction from the Boards. Seconded, moved, and duly carried to accept staff recommendation. The recommendation to award will be presented to the Directors at the February 8, 1995 Joint Boards meeting. -9- Minutes of Planning, Design and Construction Committee Meeting November 3, 1994 Page 10 NEW PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS Consideration of Executive Committee recommendations on New Personnel Building at Plant No. 1. Job No. J-26 The General Manager explained that the Executive Committee recommended that this project be returned to the Planning, Design and Construction Committee for further consideration. A subcommittee was established, tentatively consisting of the Chair Collins, Director Swan, Director Griffin, and the General Manager to establish a scope of work to address facilities planning, the interrelationships of departments, proposed personnel projections, and perform space planning studies; then determine future action. Director Swan asked that consideration be given to moving Personnel into the Administration Building and have the meeting rooms in a separate facility. This alternative will be considered. The first meeting will include the General Manager and the Director of Engineering. CONSIDERATION OF NEW AND MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS Direct staff to prepare a scope of work for a Strategic Information Systems Plan, develop a short list of firms with expertise in developing Strategic Information Systems Plans, request proposals, and submit the best proposal to the Committee for approval and recommendation to the Joint Boards to award a Professional Services Agreement. The General Manager gave a brief overview of the project that is proposed to assess existing and future needs, how data is stored and treated, and short-and long- term requirements. The Strategic Information Systems Plan will allow integration of the identified long-term solutions for the Laboratory Information Network System, the Computerized Maintenance Management System, the Financial Information System, the Plant Automation System, and our Office Automation System. The approach to be used was suggested by Ernst &Young in their Phase III report whereby a consultant would work with key staff members, end users and the Boards to determine the information and delivery systems required to achieve the Districts' mission in their long-term facilities master plan. Several questions were raised about the timing of this plan, whether or not this is being reviewed by the Steering Committee, and if the PDC Committee is the place to make the recommendations. Director Swan expressed concern that we were putting the -10- Minutes of Planning, Design ' and Construction Committee Meeting November 3, 1994 Page 11 cart before the horse, and that it seemed that some of the items in the project have already been completed or are progress, and questioned what would be done if the plan resulted in a recommendation in a direction other than that which is in place. Moved, and seconded, and duly carried that the item be referred directly to the Executive Committee for consideration without recommendation. Staff asked that they be given any information on this item that has been developed by the Steering Committee so any suggestions and requirements can be included in the package. Authorization to issue a Purchase order to AVNET Computer of Tustin. CA, in the amount of$150,374.00 plus tax, for the Purchase of two DEC 2100-600 AXP computers to provide increased capacity for the Laboratory Information Management Systems LIM Moved, seconded, and duly carried that a purchase order be issued to AVNET Computer in the amount of$150,374.00 plus tax, for the Purchase of two DEC 2100-600 AXP computers. The item will be presented to the Boards of Directors at the December 14, 1994 meeting. CLOSED SESSION Chair Collins dismissed the need for a Closed Session. OTHER BUSINESS There was no new or other business introduced. NEXT MEETING Chair Collins announced that there would be a meeting on December 1, 1994 to discuss the Directors Handbook and the Policies and Procedures for Professional Services Agreements; Addenda to Professional Services Agreement; Approving Plans and Specifications, Bidding and Awarding Construction Contracts; and Construction Contract Change Orders. -11- Minutes of Planning, Design and Construction Committee Meeting November 3, 1994 Page 12 ADJOURNMENT At approximately 8:45 p.m., the Committee adjourned. Minutes prepare and submitted by: 9mmittee Secre ry _12_ r �} II County County, Districts of Orange County,California P.O.Box 8127.108"Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92729.8127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 MINUTES OF FINANCE AND PERSONNEL COMMITTEE MEETING DATE November 16, 1994, 5:30 P.M. A meeting of the Finance and Personnel Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on November 16, 1994, at 5:30 p.m., at the Districts' Administrative offices. The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: Committee Directors Present: Staff Present: Peer A. Swan, Chairman Blake Anderson, General Manager Roger R. Stanton, Vice Chairman Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance George Brown Gary E. Hasenstab, Director of Personnel John C. Cox, Jr., Joint Chairman Ed Hodges, Asst. Director of Operations Jan Debay Bob Dolan, Asst. Director of Maintenance James H. Flora John Linder, Director of Engineering John M. Gullixson Michael D. White, Controller Evelyn Hart Steve Kozak, Financial Manager Wally Linn Iry Pickier Others Present: Thomas Saltarelli William G. Steiner John Coan, PaineWebber Grace H. Winchell Jeff Scruggs, PaineWebber Committee Directors Absent: Burnie Dunlap Glen Parker 4: REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE. Gary Streed, Director of Finance, introduced John Coan and Jeff Scruggs of PaineWebber who attended the meeting to discuss item 13. 5: APPROVAL OF MINUTES. The draft minutes of the Finance and Personnel Committee meeting of October 19, 1994, were approved as submitted. Minutes of Finance & Personnel Committee Page 2 November 16, 1994 e 6: DIRECTORS' COMMITTEE NOTEBOOK The revised draft of the Directors' Committee Notebook was presented by Blake Anderson, General Manager. The Notebook will consolidate the General Information for Directors Notebook and will include a page of Committee member and staff names. The text will refer to position titles rather than names to simplify and reduce the number of future editions. Blake asked for comments on both style and substance within three weeks so that the final Notebook could be available for the January Committee meetings. 7: REVIEW OF THE DISTRICTS' POLICIES REGARDING ACCRUAL AND USE OF PAID TIME OFF OR LEAVE. Gary Hasenstab, Director of Personnel, reviewed the Districts' policies regarding accrual and use of paid time off or leave in accordance with the Committee's request at the last Finance and Personnel Committee meeting. Provisions establishing the policies and procedures for paid leave are set forth in Districts' Resolution No. 79-20, Providing for Classification, Compensation and Terms of Employment; and 79-21, Providing for Rules and Regulations Regarding Terms and Conditions of Employment, as amended; and in Memoranda of Understanding with the various employee organizations. There are accrual limits for each of the categories of paid leave. Once the limit is ...✓ reached, the Payroll Office annually pays the employee for the hours in excess of the limits. This policy has not been consistently followed in all groups in the past with regard to vacation accrual, and has resulted in a total of 47 employees with current balances in excess of 100 hours. Seven employees have balances in excess of 300 hours; one of these is a result of a conversion from Personal Leave, a special case. It should be noted that Districts' employees are covered under the provisions of the 1937 Retirement Act, which does not provide for the inclusion of payoff of accrued leave balances in the final year or final three years' earnings used to determine retirement benefits as in the case with the Public Employees Retirement System (PERS). Thus, salary"spiking"to increase retirement benefits is not possible. Committee Action The Committee directed staff to include a one page summary of leave policies in their section of the Directors' Committee Notebook and to include the policies as a topic of discussion for the next MOU process. �J Minutes of Finance & Personnel Committee Page 3 November 16, 1994 8: CONSIDERATION OF MOTION AUTHORIZING STAFF TO PREPARE A RESOLUTION TO AMEND RESOLUTION NO, 79-20, AS AMENDED, TO ESTABLISH A CONFERRAL OF LEAVE POLICY. Gary Hasenstab, Director of Personnel, reviewed the Districts' conferral of leave policy which was deferred last month pending the above review of all leave policies. Four Districts' employees are confronting or experiencing catastrophic medical conditions involving either themselves or their children that will result in a depletion of all of their accrued paid leave. Several of their co-workers have expressed an interest in giving a portion of their own accrued paid leave to these individuals to at least partially offset their loss of pay, as well as to offer them support through their difficult experiences. The Districts' current policy would not allow for the donation of paid leave, including vacation, personal leave or compensatory time off, to another employee who is without paid leave. For that reason, staff recommended adoption of a conferral of leave policy. The policy provides that employees may, on a one-time basis, elect to donate accrued and unused personal leave, vacation leave or compensatory time off to an individual employee who has depleted his or her own paid leave as a direct result of a catastrophic medical condition. All such time must be conferred on a form provided by the Director of Personnel. Committee Recommendation The Finance and Personnel Committee recommends the Executive Committee consider approval of a resolution to amend Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, to establish the enclosed conferral of leave policy. 9: STATUS REPORT ON THE USE OF EXECUTIVE SEARCH FIRMS TO ASSIST WITH PERSONNEL RECRUITMENT. At the last Committee meeting the Directors asked that a discussion of the use of executive search firms be placed on the agenda. Gary Hasenstab, Director of Personnel, reported that it has not been the Districts' practice in the past to employ executive search firms or other outside means of sourcing candidates. However, it would be quite appropriate to do so in situations where a more traditional approach of using our own recruitment staff would not be an efficient use of our resources, would not have the credibility that an independent firm would offer, or where Districts' staff may not have sufficient expertise to successfully conduct a technical recruitment where identification of top candidates is particularly difficult. Minutes of Finance & Personnel Committee Page 4 November 16, 1994 The Personnel Department budget does not include executive search activities other than through a professional services arrangement. Due to the unpredictability in determining the need for such funds, it may be prudent to consider the advisability of engaging an executive search firm on a case-by-case basis. Committee Action The Committee directed staff to utilize the services of an executive search firm in certain situations and to modify the professional services budget to provide for these services in future years. 10: CONSIDERATION OF POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUALS FOR THE DISTRICTS' FINANCIAL PROGRAMS. Final draft versions of the policies and procedures manuals for the Reverse Repurchase Program, the Taxable Commercial Paper Program, and the Certificates of Participation Program were submitted for the Committee's consideration. Steve Kozak, Financial Manager, reviewed the manuals and answered questions from Committee members. Committee Action The Committee received and approved the financial program policies and ..J procedures manuals for the Reverse Repurchase Program, the Commercial Paper Program, and the Certificates of Participation Program. Staff was directed to prepare a summary to put into all of the Directors' Committee Notebooks and to include the entire manuals in the Finance and Personnel Committee Notebooks. 11: STATUS REPORT ON TAXABLE COMMERCIAL PAPER PROGRAM. Steve Kozak, Financial Manager, presented an information-only report covering the current status of the Districts' taxable Commercial Paper Program which earned $2,342,592 from inception, January 19, 1994, through November 8, 1994. 12: STATUS REPORT ON REVERSE REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS. Steve Kozak, Financial Manager, presented an information-only report covering the current status of the Districts' Reverse Repurchase Agreement Program. In 1993, the Boards authorized two $50 million Reverse Repurchase Agreements (Reverse Repos) through the County Treasurer's Office. Minutes of Finance & Personnel Committee Page 5 November 16, 1994 Since the Committee's last meeting, the Treasurer's Office has completed a rollover for each of the Districts' Reverse Repos. The results of these rollovers are summarized as follows: ROLLOVER .. FNMA REVERSAL -DATE COUPON RATE RATE PRICE MATUR" DAY ARBRR4GE Oct.28 5.10% 0.99% $92.80 Nov.28 33 0.11% Nov. 3 4.94% 5.04% $90.00 Dec.2 29 (0.10%) Since the program began in April 1993, the Reverse Repo program has earned $1,635,519 and continues to earn interest on deposits with the County Treasurer. 13: ESCROW RESTRUCTURING PROGRAM, SERIES 1992 REFUNDING CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION. A proposal to restructure the escrow portfolio for the Series 1992 Refunding Certificates of Participation (COPS) was presented by Steve Kozak and John Coan of PaineWebber and considered by the Committee . The escrow restructuring would generate an estimated $300,000 in earnings for the Districts with minimal risk. Committee Recommendation The Committee directed staff to retain PaineWebber and special counsel to assist with the review of the Series 1992 COP Escrow Restructuring proposal, and to prepare the necessary documentation for the Finance and Personnel Committee to implement the escrow restructuring. 14: CONSIDERATION OF QUARTERLY STAFF SUMMARY REPORT OF TRAINING AND TRAVEL COSTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1994. Beginning in 1993-94, the Joint Boards asked this Committee to review a staff report summarizing training and travel expenses each quarter. Accordingly, the report for the quarter ended September 30, 1994, is attached. Travel to inspect equipment fabrication for a capital project and the initial training required for a new facility may be appropriately capitalized and charged to that project. Such costs are paid through the respective capital fund, generally the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund (CORF). In order to fully report to the Committee, these charges were captured and included in the report. For this reason, the costs in the report are not the same as those in the quarterly JO budget review. Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance, presented a summary report of training and ..� travel costs for the quarter ended September 30, 1994. All costs were included and total costs are within budget projections. Minutes of Finance & Personnel Committee Page 6 November 16, 1994 15: CONSIDERATION OF JOINT WORKS BUDGET REVIEWS PREPARED BY STAFF FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1994. Gary G. Streed, Finance Director, presented the enclosed Joint Works Budget reviews for the quarter ended September 30, 1994 to the Committee as follows: Joint Works Operating Costs (JO), the Joint Works Capital Improvement Program (CORF), and the costs of the workers' compensation, public liability and health plan self-insurance funds. With one-fourth of the year gone, 20.81% of the net joint operating budget has been expended. Net costs are down $537,772 or 4.96%, compared with the same period last year. This cost decrease is primarily due to decreases in the biosolids handling costs (which are not expected to last to year end), reduced electricity and natural gas purchases, and increased revenues from other agencies served on a contractual basis. Small increases and decreases in other categories make up the balance. At the same time, flows have increased 6.08%. Therefore, the net decrease in costs and the increase in total flows have resulted in a $54.95 per million gallons decrease in the unit cost to treat and dispose of sewage, to $472.99 per million gallons. Costs are expected to increase over the balance of the year. Joint Works construction projects for the first three months are lower than originally scheduled, running at 7% of the 1994-95 budget or$4.9 million. We continue to receive excellent bids on new projects, reflecting the slow economy. Several projects have completed the design stage and are nearly ready to be awarded, and progress payments on these projects will increase CORF outlay over the remainder of the year. The self-funded insurance programs are operating within their budgets. The indemnity medical plan was converted from self-funded to purchased during 1993-94. 16: CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FROM KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP FOR AN INCREASE IN THE MAXIMUM FEES FOR THE 1993-94 FINANCIAL AUDIT FROM $46 800 PLUS EXPENSES TO $63,661 PLUS EXPENSES, AN INCREASE OF $17,061. The Finance Director reported that KPMG Peat Marwick has provided independent professional audit services to the Districts since 1975. In February, the Fiscal Policy Committee directed staff to obtain a proposal for KPMG to extend their services through the 1993-94 audit. At the May Joint Board meeting, KPMG was retained for an amount not to exceed $46,800 plus expenses for 1,095 hours in accordance with a Finance and Personnel Committee recommendation. The prior year's audit fees for 1,192 hours were $43,750 plus expenses. i Minutes of Finance & Personnel Committee Page 7 November 16, 1994 KPMG has incurred charges for the 1993-94 audit for 1,834 hours or$76,241 plus expenses. They have invoiced the Districts for a total of$63,861 for their fees, an increase in the authorized amount of$17,D61. KPMG and staff agree that the hours overrun is attributable to the change to a CAFR format subsequent to KPMG's proposal, audit adjustments required to report in accordance with GAAP, and a complete change in audit staff. The hours billed to the Districts can be summarized as: Hours COP Refunding & Other Entries 76 Equity and Fund Balance Adjustments 27 Accounts Receivable Issues 57 Fixed Assets & Capitalized Interest 48 CAFR Format Change & Additional Review 115 Other Adjustments 6 Total 329 By paying the entire adjustment requested, the Districts will have paid for 329 of the 739 hours incurred in excess of the proposal, or 45% of the excess. The KPMG average rate for the 1,424 hours would then be $44.85 per hour, or 34% of their standard billing rate. Recommended Action The Finance and Personnel Committee recommends a change to the service agreement with KPMG Peat Marwick for professional audit services for the 1993-94 fiscal year increasing the maximum authorized amount from $17,061.00 to $63,861.00 plus out-of-pocket expenses at cost. 17: CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED STAFFING CHANGES FOR PLANT OPERATIONS AND APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION RESOLUTION. Bob Dolan, Assistant Director of Operations, reviewed proposed staffing changes which had been approved by the Fiscal Policy Committee during the 1994-95 budget process. The changes were later held in abeyance by the Executive Committee pending organization and management studies by Ernst & Young. Mr. Ooten reviewed those previously approved requests which are now needed to improve the productivity of the Operations Department and to properly classify the work that is being done. The attached proposal is for a net decrease of two authorized positions and an annual salary budget savings of$56,136 at the top of the ranges and at full employment. Minutes of Finance & Personnel Committee Page 8 November 16, 1994 Six of the changes involve current employees, three are the deletion of currently vacant positions, and one is an additional position. The already budgeted maximum cost of the addition is $76,320. Committee Recommendation The Finance and Personnel Committee recommends an amendment to the Classification and Compensation Resolution for a net decrease of two positions and a maximum annual salary budget savings of$56,136.00 which was included in the 1994-95 budgets. 18: CONSIDERATION OF CASH AWARDS AND CERTIFICATES OF COMMENDATION FOR PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY IN DAILY EFFORT (PRIDE) SUGGESTIONS NOS, 388, 394 AND 397. During the past few months, several PRIDE suggestions have been submitted for consideration and evaluation. The review has been completed and recommendations for certificates and cash awards totaling $364.00 in accordance with the Board-approved PRIDE program, are summarized in the attached staff report. Committee Action The Finance and Personnel Committee authorized certificates and commendations and cash awards totaling $364.00 to the four employees who submitted the three PRIDE suggestions. 19: ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 7:10 p.m. GGS:Ic JIWPOOgFIMLRI NE�FPCMrO�FPCP1bNNPC1181 Enclosures _ County Sanitation Districts r II of Orange County,California P.O. Box 8127 • 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 MINUTES OF THE EXECUTIVE SUBCOMMITTEE NOVEMBER 29, 1994 - 5:30 P.M. A meeting of the Executive Subcommittee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Tuesday, November 29, 1994, at 5:30 p.m., at the Districts' Administrative Offices. The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: EXECUTIVE SUBCOMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT: Present: Thomas Woodruff, General Counsel Larry Seigel, Ernst & Young John C. Cox, Jr., Chair Elizabeth Van Denburgh, Ernst & Young Peer A. Swan, Vice Chair Shawn Shope, Ernst & Young John J. Collins John M. Gullixson STAFF PRESENT: Barry Hammond Sal A. Sapien Blake P. Anderson, General Manager Roger Stanton Gary Streed, Director of Finance Gary Hasenstab, Director of Personnel Margaret H. Nellor, Director of Technical Services Absent: Ed Hodges, Director of Maintenance Bob Ooten, Director of Operations None John Linder, Director of Engineering APPROVAL OF MINUTES. The minutes of the October 14, 1994, Executive Subcommittee meeting, were approved as drafted. A. REVIEW OF FINAL REPORT OF ERNST & YOUNG RE PHASE 2 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT MANAGEMENT PROCESS FOCUSED IMPROVEMENT STUDY WITH ACTION PLANS. Agenda Item 6 (a): Ernst& Young provided an oral review of their final report. An outline of their presentation is attached. On November 8, 1994, Ernst & Young conducted an all-day workshop with nine members of Districts' staff(including the General Manager; Directors of Operations, Maintenance, Engineering and Finance; and four project managers) to establish an improvement implementation plan and schedule based on the Capital Improvement Project Management Minutes of the Executive Subcommittee •, November 29, 1994 Page 2 Final Report (as well as Operations and Maintenance Functions - see Agenda Item 7). Project leaders were assigned to the 14 improvement areas identified in the report: 1. Planning, Design and Construction Projects Team Structure 2. Expanded Job Plan 3. Enhanced Scope of Work 4. Project Clearinghouse Group 5. Design Services Procurement Flexibility 6. Construction Contracts Change Orders 7. Small Projects Administration Group 8. Shop Drawing Submittal Improvements 9. As-Built Drawings Improvements 10. Contract Administration it. Conflict Resolution Procedure 12. Policies and Procedures Manual 13. Designer Manual 14. Users (Internal Customers) Group On November 30, 1994, the project leaders will assemble teams to address each of the 14 areas. Staff assigned to this improvement implementation plan are expected to devote one- day per week to this effort. Project leaders will be reporting every two weeks on their progress to make sure that progress is occurring. Project completion for most of these 14 areas is scheduled during the first half of 1995. Executive Subcommittee Recommendation. The Executive Subcommittee recommended to: (1) Receive and file and accept as final, Ernst & Young's report entitled "Capital Improvement Project Management Process Focused Improvement Study with Action Plans, November 1994". (2) The Executive Subcommittee also directed staff to design and conduct an implementation plan of the 14 recommendations contained within the report and to update the Subcommittee quarterly on the progress of the plan. B. AUTHORIZE STAFF TO ISSUE PURCHASE ORDERS FOR VALUE ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR AN AGGREGATE TOTAL AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $50,000. Agenda Item 6 (b): As part of their work on the Evaluation of Operations and Maintenance, Ernst &Young, in their recommendation#36, suggested that a one week Value Engineering workshop would be useful to evaluate the nature and timing of facilities now on our master plan calendar for design and construction. As a result of this recommendation, the Districts' General Manager asked Gordon Culp of Smith Culp Consulting to submit a letter outlining the concept and providing a preliminary budget. Staff recommended to the Executive Subcommittee that a five-day workshop as outlined in Culp's letter be conducted in December or January to review our planning efforts and to provide a basis for the 1995-96 fiscal year budgeting process that will begin in the first quarter of 1995. Minutes of the Executive Subcommittee November 29, 1994 Page 3 Aker a discussion, the Executive Subcommittee recommends delaying consideration of this matter until after the decision on filling the General Managers position is finalized, and the successful candidate can participate in the Value Engineering process. REVIEW OF FINAL REPORT OF ERNST&YOUNG RE EVALUATION OF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE FUNCTIONS. Emst& Young provided an overview of their final report. An outline of their presentation is attached. On November 8, 1994, staff and Emst& Young met for a full day to conduct a workshop to establish an improvement implementation plan and schedule for the Operations and Maintenance Departments (in parallel to the work described above). There are a total of 38 improvement items- some of them fairly extensive and some fairly minor. They can be grouped as follows: A. Management and Organization (8 items) B. Staffing (4 items) C. Training (8 items) D. Safety (3 items) E. Policies and Procedures (8 items) F. Equipment and Facilities (4 items) G. Areas for Further Study (3 items) Project Leaders have been selected from Districts' staff who will, in turn, assemble project teams to ...i address each of the 38 improvement items. The improvement implementation plan for Operations and Maintenance is similar to the schedule for Capital Improvement Projects- completion during 1995. Executive Subcommittee Recommendation. The Executive Subcommittee recommended to: (1) Receive and file and accept as final, Emst& Young's report entitled "Evaluation of Operations and Maintenance, November 1994". (2) Direct staff to design and conduct an implementation plan of the 38 recommendations contained within the report and to update the Subcommittee quarterly on the progress of the plan. STATUS REPORT OF ERNST & YOUNG RE EVALUATION OF HUMAN RESOURCES. The Subcommittee recommended (and the Boards have approved) an addenda to the professional services agreement with Emst & Young to evaluate the human resources functions of the Districts. The compensation to Emst & Young for this task is for a total amount not to exceed $60,000. Emst & Young has been conducting its evaluation since October and provided the Subcommittee with a verbal status report on the progress and observations to date. An outline of their presentation is attached. Minutes of the Executive Subcommittee November 29, 1994 Page 4 DISCUSSION OF ADDITIONAL ASSESSMENT AND IMPROVEMENT STUDIES BY ERNST & YOUNG. Ernst & Young discussed the content of their November 9, 1994, letter to Joint Chairman Cox included in this Agenda Item which touches on the status of their work on the human resources activities of the Districts and provides suggestions on further areas of study to assist us in our improvement program. Margie Nellor reviewed the scope of work for the Technical Services Department Assessment which is also included. In its letter, Ernst & Young suggested work in the following areas: 1. Finance Department. Assessment of Finance Department including its supporting role to operational and administrative functions of the Districts. Assessment would include the three existing activity areas of Finance that are: Accounting and Revenue, Information Services and Purchasing and Warehouse. They estimate a six to eight week project period and fees and expenses of$70,000. 2. Technical Services Department. Review of organizational alternatives within the Technical Services Department. In their letter of November 9, 1994, they indicated a cost of approximately $25,000. In the staff report and recommendation contained herein, a not-to-exceed cost of$30,000 is recommended. The attached scope of work was prepared at the direction of the Subcommittee following discussions at the October 14, 1994, meeting regarding the Ernst & young Phase 3 Work Plan, and the 1994-95 proposed Personnel Budget proposal to realign a portion of the responsibilities performed with the Technical Services Department. Margie Nellor reviewed the proposed scope of work for the Technical Services Department's critical success factor review. The purpose of this project is to inventory the Technical Services Department's strengths and weaknesses, clarify mission, goals and objectives, and develop an action plan to address those aspects of the Department that can be enhanced and to identify concomitant resource needs. The estimated cost for Ernst &Young's services related to this project is $30,000. 3. Engineering Department. This proposal is to provide continued support to develop a new capital improvement project process. Now that the final report has been submitted, "the ball is now in staffs court"to turn the 14 recommendations into action. Ernst & Young is suggesting that they can help facilitate this process. They would work with the project leaders and facilitate group sessions to develop detailed implementation plans for the 14 recommendations. They anticipate assigning two managers over a relatively intense three to six week schedule followed by meetings every two weeks over a period of three months to keep the implementation work on track and on schedule. They estimate fees and expense would be $70,000. Staff, with the help of an Ernst & Young facilitated all day meeting, has already assigned project leaders to address the recommendations of Ernst&Young. Project teams will be assembled on November 30 and work on the recommendations. Work will proceed through 1995 with most scheduled for completion during the first half of the year. i • Minutes of the Executive Subcommittee November 29, 1994 Page 5 While staff believes that meeting facilitation was useful to the process on which we are embarking, we also are eager to get on with this project on our own terms and to depend upon our managers and staff to organize teams and complete the work. Combined with the work that will be going on in parallel (see#4 below), staff believes that it is time to cut the cord and work on this project on our own. If, during the early part of 1995, staff find themselves bogging-down because of inadequate staff time or because they have lost their way and need outside guidance and facilitation, then they will turn to the Subcommittee for advise or additional spending authorization. In the meantime, staff recommends that the Subcommittee depend upon the efforts of staff alone to complete the implementation plan for the capital projects improvement process. 4. Districts-wide Performance Measurement System and Performance Improvement. Ernst & Young's early assessment is that the Districts do not have adequate measurement criteria and the data reporting systems needed to effectively track and manage the performance of key activity areas of the agency are not available. A robust performance measurement system will give our managers the tools and insight to recognize areas needing improvement and the feedback necessary to know if their efforts are producing desired improvements. Building a working performance measurement and improvement system requires the following: a. Establish the goals, objectives and values of the Districts. b. Identify the measurement information that will be used to gauge the Districts' efficiency and progress in meeting its goals, objectives and values. C. Develop procedures and systems to collect, process, understand and use the measurement information. d. Facilitate changes in individual and organizational values so that performance improvement will succeed. e. Develop a reward/corrective action process that will support performance improvement. I. Create a method to regularly reassess the system to keep it relevant. Ernst& Young envisions a three phase process. Phase I would define the requirements of our performance measurement and improvement system by determining performance measures needed agency-wide, assessing our current performance measurements and surveying other agencies and entities to identify leading practices. They estimate Phase I would take 6 to 8 weeks and fees and expenses would be $58,000. Phase II would design the performance measurement and improvement system and Phase III would implement it. They have not estimated the cost of these phases because they cannot be accurately scoped until after the Phase I needs assessment is completed. Staff believes that this proposal has significant merit to the organization. We are measuring our ..i performance today in a number of ways which have served us well; as illustrated by our consistent compliance with all of our regulatory obligations, low operating costs and user fees, and reliable r Minutes of the Executive Subcommittee November 29, 1994 Page 6 systems. However, this is a macroscopic view. When it comes to a system-by-system and program- by-program analysis of our activities, we simply do not have sufficiently focussed and timely tools to do so. Because we are on a pathway of performance improvement within all segments of the organization, these tools will be vital to our success. Performance improvement may be a laudable goal and a noble philosophy, but it will be difficult to effect change without our managers and staff having the tools to benchmark today's performance and to measure tomorrow's improvements. That is why a coherent system of measurement techniques is important. Staff, by itself, may be capable of eventually crafting a system that can adequately measure our performance. However, it would be somewhat hit-and-miss. Emst& Young's help and guidance would provide staff with resources and concepts that we simply do not adequately possess at this time. Executive Subcommittee Recommendations: The Executive Subcommittee made the motion, seconded and duly carried to: (1) Approve the scope of work for the Finance Department Assessment to be conducted by Emst & Young for a cost of fees and expenses not to exceed $70,000. (2) Delay consideration of additional work by Emst & Young for continuing support of the capital improvement project process pending a recommendation by Staff at a future meeting of the Subcommittee. (3) Approve the scope of work for the Technical Services Department Assessment to be conducted with assistance from Emst & Young for a cost of fees and expenses not to exceed $30,000. (4) Approve the scope of work for Phase I Performance Measurement and Improvement Plan to be conducted by Ernst& Young for a cost of fees and expenses not to exceed $58,000. (5) Approve an Addendum to the Professional Services Agreement with Emst& Young to perform the Financial Department Assessment, the Technical Services Department Assessment and the Phase I Performance Measurement and Improvement Plan in an amount not to exceed $158,000, increasing the total compensation authorized to an amount not to exceed of$453,000. Director Gullixson voted against the motion and requested his opposition be made a matter of record. ADJOURNMENT. The Executive Subcommittee adjourned at approximately 7:40 p.m. I> abmtexec\t 12W4.eem Capital/O&M improvement Projects ID Name Rinairme Nam Nov'94 Dec'94 Jon'95 Fab'9 Mar'95 Apr'95 MGY95 Jun'95 Jut'95[Aug VS Sep'95 Oct'95 Nov'95 Dec'95 1 PROJECT KICK-OFF 2 Briefing to Protect Leaders by supervisor Kick-off team 3 Develop report formats W.Severandl 4 Meet with team leaders Klok-oll loam 5 Canmunicale asslgnatwnl 6 Present standard Implementation plan 7 Discuss reporting responslblllHes(verbal, B Discuss conflict resolution 9 Outline Hme tronre 10 Identify retreat members for each team 11 Assign date tot Implementation plan co 12 GM meek With deprehnents-all hands s.Anderson 13 Team members look at their workload and n Sup.jeam More 14 CAPITAL PROJECT MGT.IMPROVEMEM PROJECTS IS I.Protect Team Struehrre M.Esgmr 16 Design Protect 17 Comtrttetlon Protect Is Planning 19 2.Expanded Job Plan D.Fredericks 20 3.Enhanced Scope of Work P.Mitchell 21 4.Cleadnghoure Mgmt.Group B.Oolen 22 S.Design Procuranterd Flexib" J.Under 23 6.Change Order J.Under 24 7.Small Protects Group J.Dellte 25 B.SubnYHal Group C.Cervellone 26 9.As-Bullt Drawings T.Haynes 27 10.Contract AdnYnlshafors S.Kosack 26 11.Conflict Resolution W.Sevenandi 29 12.Policies Is Procedures and OM 26 T.Down Capital/O&M Improvement Projects ID I Harra Resource Name NO9'96 Dac'94 Jan'95 Feb'9 Mar'95 Apr'95 May'9 Jun'95 Jul'95 Aug'95 Sep'95 Oct VS Nov'95 Dec'95 r Table of Contents Draf Nnal 13.Design Manuals T.Dawn Tade of Contents Draf Final 37 14 Uses Goup N.Adronlas Je OBMIMPROVEMENTPROJECTS 39 Cap.protects staffing(OM 9-12,36) B.Anderson 40 Trahloll 41 Phase 1 (O&M) T.Flannigan 42 Phase WO TBD 47 Safety(OM 21.23) T.Jnway 4l Finance TOM S.27,29.30.31) G.Skead 45 Equip.B Fac.(OM 32) R.Carta 46 Equlp.&Foe.TOM 33) E.Hodges 47 Equip.B Foe.(OM 34) D.Cook 48 Equlp.6 Fac.(OM 35) E.Hodges 49 PmductMty TOM 36) B.Anderson 60 Reorganize OHM(OM 1,37) B.Anderson 51 Goals/Communlcallon(OM 2,3) B.Anderson 62 PRIDE(OM 4) G.. ----tab 53 Customer/Supplier(OM 6) N.AdlaiM County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Capital Projects/O&M Projects Status Reporting Structure Joint Boards Quarterly Status* Executive Executive on all projects (E. Committee Subcommittee Hodges, B. Outer, and N. Arhonles) OMTS F&P PDC Calendaring by Dept. Heads N. Arhontes compiles status Operations E. Hodges and B. Omen report for 13 projects mot Users Group compile status reports for O&M leader eve 2 weeks. Manager ro ects eve 2 weeks. Hold project ry (Capital Projects P 1 every Reports verbally during dept. only) Maintenance discussions in dept. head head meeting. Manager meetings as necessary. Bi-weekly Status Report • Accomplishments(last 2 weeks) • Accomplishments(next 2 weeks) • Issues • Progress status 4 Project Leader summary of all projects and agenda item front sheet for each project J ERNST&YOUNG LLP NW-18-1994 15:05 SMITH CULP CONSLIITING 2oG 935 0309 P.02 Puwtnc . EzotmG . FACIffATMN . TRAINM . PAtGNMJNG . MEDIGM November 18, 1994 Mr.Blake Anderson General Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange County PO Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA_ 92728-8127 Dear Blake: I am writing to offer my thoughts on the value engineering effort described in the Phase IB O&M report. As we discussed at the meeting earlier in the week, I have contacted Mack Wesner, Bob Gumerman, and Frank Dryden to determine their interest in participating in such an effort. All would like to participate. You indicated that you would also like to include one representative from Carollo and one from Boyle. In addition, you may want to include a representative from the Districts'staff. I am attaching a brief description of the approach and approximate cost. Tn this case, I would be contracting directly with the Districts rather than through Ernst and Young. They advised me that they do not see a role for themselves in the value engineering effort and would prefer not to be involved in the contractual aspects. Would it be more expeditious for the Districts to contract directly with each individual team member? Perhaps you have some contracts in place with Boyle and Carollo that could be readily amended for their involvement. Once you approve of the effort, I will contact each team member to finalize the schedule. hying to align the schedules of several individuals for four consecutive days of work will probably require 4-6 weeks advance notice. T am excited about the opportunity to work on this effort and look forward to your comments and suggestions. Very ly yours, Gordon Culp `... 5114 S.W.Imda Saw �W6)915-9945 Sank.WA 98116 F. (9M6 M0304 .1 18-1994 15'OS SMITH =ULP CONSULTING 206 935 3309 P.03 f VALUE ENGiiNEERING REVIEW OF PLANNED SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS �. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Value Engineering team: Team coordinator- Gordon Culp: Team members-Mack Wesner, Bob Gumermao, Frank Dryden. representative from Boyle Engineering, representative from John Carello, representative from Districts. Workshop Agenda Day One A.M. Introduction by team coordinator Description of the long range plan and proposed projects, presented by the Districts Discussion of team questions about the projects and the plan Brief tour of the two plants Day One P.M. Brainstorming of creative ideas Day Two A.M. Continue listing creative ideas Begin selection of best ideas for father development based on advantages and disadvantages and ranking of ideas .... Day Two P.M. Complete selection of beat ideas Begin evaluation of highest ranked ideas, including life cycle costs and timing Day Three A.M. and P.M. Continue evaluation of ideas Day Four A.M. Complete evaluations Day Four P.M. Prepare summary of evaluations Informal presentation of workshop results to Districts NO'.�-i13-1934 15 0o SMITH CULP CONSULTING 206 935 0309 P,04 Estimated Effort Finalize arrangements with team(assumed that Districts will contract with each individual team member directly; so no consultant effort needed) Collect relevant information and distribute to team members for review-(assumed that team coordinator will discuss materials with Districts staff and reach agreement on relevant materials;Districts will copy and distribute materials one week in advance of workshop) Team coordinator 6 hours Team members and coordinator review materials Team coordinator, members 8 hours each Workshop Team coordinator, members 32 hours each Review and check team worksheets after workshop Team coordinator 4 hours Prepare summary report Team coordinator 16 hours Clerical 8 hours _ Schedule and attend a review conference to discuss Districts reaction to report and address any questions about team recommendations Team coordinator 8 hours Team members, assume two 4 hours each Project coordination Team coordinator 8 hours 0 16-199C 150E SMITH _ULP C.7t•EULT!NG 206 935 0309 P.05 Estimated costs Team coordinator .� 78 hours at S165/hour $12,780 Clerical, 8 hours at $30/hour $240 Travel Two air fares $700 Hotel, meals, rental car $800 Printing, telephone, miscellaneous . S400 Subtotal $15,010 Team members, each 40 hours each at assumed average rate of$150/hr. S6,000 Expenses Assume 4 with only local travel $150 Assume 1 from Walnut Creek $1000 Total estimated costs Team coordinator $15,010 Team members 4 at $6,150 each $24,600 1 at $7,000 S7 000 Estimated total costs $46,610 ? J ERNST&YOUNG LL P . suite 800 • Phone: 714 252 2300 1 a4M Van (annan Avenue Irvine,California 92715.1551 November 9, 1994 VIA Federal Express Mr. John Cox,Jr. Joint Chairman County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 313 Baywood Newport Beach CA 92660 Dear Mr. Cox: This letter updates the status of our current work at the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (Districts), and shares our insight regarding the direction of potential further assistance we may provide your Board. We believe we are better able to define important opportunities as a result of the completed Phase II and III work. In that sense, this letter updates the listing of potential projects presented to your Board at the conclusion of Phase I. -- Status of Current Projects Ernst & Young has obtained staff input on our two reports: 1) Improvement of the Capital Project Management Process and 2) Review of Maintenance and Operations. We plan to set up a full-day session with the Districts' management to develop a high-level implementation approach for these two reports. We anticipate that Districts' staff will move into implementation of the improvement projects and recommendations after this meeting. Later in this letter, we define how Ernst & Young could assist staff in the implementation of the recommendations. We are approximately fifty percent (50%) complete in the assessment of the Human Resources/Personnel function. Ernst & Young has identified the following areas of improvement based on our work-to-date. ❑ Centralize training within HR to enable more coordinated planning and implementation ❑ Enhance meaningfulness of performance management feedback ❑ Create a central repository for personnel policies and procedures ❑ Update employee handbook ❑ Strengthen proactive sourcing of hiring candidates ❑ Fill personnel supervisor position to enable personnel to be more proactive and increase professionalism J ERNST&YOUNG LLP John Cox Page 2 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County November 9, 1994 ❑ Develop and monitor performance metrics for the HR function and implement management reporting of these metrics. We are completing our interviews and plan to draft our report within the month. Additional Opportunities to Improve Districts' Operations To date, our assistance to the Districts has been focused on fast performing a diagnostic assessment(i.e.,the Phase I Review and the Review of Operations and Maintenance) and then working with staff to develop improved processes to address the assessment findings. With two exceptions, we believe the Districts is now ready to move ahead from assessing current performance to building the infrastructure needed to ensure effective and economic performance. Therefore, we are recommending only one area for assessment — Finance — and then suggest how we can hlep the Districts build the needed infrastructure. Assessment Areas Finance, was identified as a high potential improvement area at the end of Phase I. We would identify and document the current processes that Finance performs. Emphasis would be placed on Finance's role in supporting the operational and administrative needs of the District including internal controls, treasury, cost accounting and financial management functions. We would understand what systems they use and how people are organized and utilized. We would review the three areas under Finance including: Accounting and Revenue, Information Services and Purchasing and Warehouse. We would be looking for efficiency and effectiveness improvements in these three areas. We estimate this project would take six to eight weeks, and fees and expenses would be Seventy Thousand Dollars ($70,000). Finance and the related administrative functions are key to implementation of performance measurement discussed later in this letter. Based on this important role and our prior assistance to the District, we believe this investment in assessing Finance is warranted. Infrastructure Building Projects We have identified three infrastructure areas which could benefit from our participation. The first area is a minor assist requested by your Board. At you request, we met with Margie Neller to discuss organizational alternatives for Technical Services. We anticipate Ms. Neller will request your authorization to engage us to facilitate several organizational activities at a cost of approximately Twenty Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000). NERNST&YOUNG LLP John Cox Page 3 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County November 9, 1994 The second area would be to continue to support the developing of a new capital improvement project process. At the same time, we would help implement the recommendations resulting from the Operations and Maintenance review. Ernst & Young would provide assistance in developing detailed implementation plans as well as monitoring the implementation progress and status for approximately three months. We have successfully worked with client personnel, who are identified as project leaders and given ultimate responsibility for implementation of the improvement project or subset of recommendation, in previous engagements to develop detailed implementation plans that are used to guide, monitor and status the implementation's success. Status reporting mechanisms for the project leaders have already been put in place. We recommend the Users Group (as defined in the Improvement of Capital Project Management report) be established to monitor implementation status, decide policy, ensure proper resources are allocated and resolve conflicts and issues. We proposed that this User's Group would status every two weeks for two months and once a month thereafter until the implementation is complete. Our level of effort would include working individually with project leaders and then in facilitated sessions to develop the detailed implementation plans. We anticipate assigning two managers over a three to six week time frame depending on the availability of Districts staff. After this startup effort, we would anticipate an Ernst & Young manager would meet with project managers every two weeks to status the implementation and prepare for the User's Group review for a period of three months. The fees and expenses for this project would be Seventy Five Thousand Dollars ($75,000). The third, broader area of assistance would be to develop a Districts-wide performance measurement system. As you know, the Districts do not have the metrics, pertinent data or systems to support effective tracking, measurement and management of performance. A true performance measurement process goes well beyond summarizing selected operational and financial data. The concept of continuous improvement needs focused attention and constant reiteration from management. Additionally, a strong measurement focus must be taken to determine the improvement progress. We believe a baseline for the beginning of a continuous improvement focus at the Districts is the assessment, design and implementation of a performance measurement system for all departments. Building a working "system"requires a process that includes: ❑ determining the objectives and scope of the potential system through an understanding of the needs,interests and commitments of the Board,management and key staff J ERNST&YOUNG LLP John Cox Page 4 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County November 9, 1994 ❑ developing measures which respond to the identified needs and reflect best practices of other related organizations ❑ developing a plan, and then the processes and systems, to collect, process and use the measurement information ❑ facilitating the change in personal and organizational values that must occur to enable the success of any performance measurement effort ❑ determining the reward/corrective action process that will be driven by performance measurement ❑ creating the mechanism to continuously iterate the process to keep performance measures appropriate, focused and useful. This process cuts across the divisions, systems and activities that comprise the Districts. Our approach to assisting the Districts in this critical effort would be comprised of three phases: I. Defining requirements II. Designing the process III. Implementation Phases I1 and III cannot be accurately scoped or priced until Phase I is largely accomplished. For Phase I, we would conduct an overall analysis of all departments to determine what performance measures need to be captured and reported on an ongoing basis to support the Districts'mission, goals, strategy and performance improvements targets. During this analysis, the Districts' mission, goals and strategy will be confirmed with management and key Board members. We will then assess the current performance measurements and their associated systems in place in each department. During this time we will also be identifying common and leading practices for performance measurement among municipal and investor-owned utilities or sanitation districts. Working the Districts' staff and management and key Board members, we would identify key performance measurements for each department to support the Districts' long-term strategy. We would then develop a high-level approach to design and implement the identified departmental performance measurements. We estimate this first project would take 6 to 8 weeks and fees and expenses would be Fifty Eight Thousand Dollars ($58,000). J ERNST&YOUNG LLP John Cox Page 5 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County November 9, 1994 Phase II would focus on the "how" of accomplishing this design. This phase may include: ❑ determining training requirements ❑ restructuring the requirements, selection and implementation of a new financial management system which can support a performance measurement program (i.e., cost accounting,production reporting,etc.) ❑ organizational change management services to facilitate healthy acceptance and support of the effort by staff and management; and ❑ developing reports,rewards and performance correction policies and procedures. The final phase(Phase III)would translate design into implementation. This effort would go beyond the initial installation and "shake-out" and include interactive changes that time and experience with the new process may show necessary. We hope this update is useful to you and your Board in understanding or progress and �.r the potential for further improvement. Please call Larry Seigel at (714) 252-2402 if we can provide additional information. Very truly yours, in asvn�LLY r.' November 17, 1994 IAWNMOWULORWIVIhAU YAG SCOPE OF WORK `. Technical Services Department Review Critical Success Factors Purpose: Inventory the Technical Services Department's (TSD's) strengths and weaknesses, clarify the TSD's mission, goals and objectives, and develop an action plan to address those aspects of the Department that can be enhanced and to identify concomitant resource needs. Elements: Responsibilities: 1. Review the TSD's goals, mission and objectives; collect Margie Nellor, TSD Division background information on trends in work loads, Managers and Ernst & Young. productivity, future work demands, and regulatory mandates. 2. Contact other wastewater and water agencies with Margie Nellor to contact the Technical Services Departments or other similar agencies and compile the organizational structures to review their goals, missions information gathered. and objectives. 3. Solicit input from the Department's major internal Margie Nellor to meet with customers on the TSD in terms of anticipated needs, Operations, Maintenance, unmet needs, responsiveness, timeliness and quality. Engineering and Finance Department Heads to solicit input. Solicit input from the TSD Divisions' internal Division Managers to solicit input customers in terms of anticipated needs, responsiveness, from staff on how well the internal timeliness and quality. needs of the Department are being met. 4. Conduct a focussed survey of TSD staff regarding such Ernst & Young. issues as goal setting (do they have an understanding of the Districts' and Department's goals and their roles) and readiness to change. 5. Meet with the Executive Subcommittee or Districts' Margie Nellor, TSD Division Joint Chair, Joint Vice Chair and General Manager for Managers and Ernst & Young. feedback on the review process and its status. Scope of Work for TSD Review • Page 1 Elements: Responsibilities: 6. Hold a one-day, off-site meeting with the TSD Ernst & Young to provide Department Head, Division Managers, Administrative facilitation and facilities for the Assistant and K.P. Lindstrom, Inc. to (a) review the meeting. TSD's goals, mission and objectives, the background information on trends, and the results of the staff survey; and (b) discuss the Department's strengths and weaknesses in terms of: people � customer satisfaction responsibilities � procedures structure � other resource needs 7. Hold a strategy session based on the results of the Ernst & Young to facilitate the meeting. Deliverables to include: strategy session and review the a refined set of mission, goals and objectives deliverables coming out of the for the Department and each Division. strategy session. options for organization of the Department (short-term and long-term). performance measures. action plan for implementation that addresses resource requirements in terms of people, systems, procedures and other needs. 8. Present the results of the review/recommendations to Margie Nellor and Ernst & Young the Districts' Executive Subcommittee and the u Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee. Recommended Time Frame: December 1994 - March 1995 Estimated Cost: Ernst & Young $30,000 Scope of Work for TSD Review• Page 2 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California P.O. Box 8127 a 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 MINUTES OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE NOVEMBER 30, 1994 -4:30 P.M. A meeting of the Steering Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Wednesday, November 30, 1994, at 4:30 p.m., at the Districts' Administrative Offices. The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: STEERING COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT: Present: None John C. Cox, Jr., Joint Chair Peer A. Swan, Vice Joint Chair and Chair, Finance & Personnel Committee STAFF PRESENT: John J. Collins, Chair, Planning, Design & Construction Committee Blake P. Anderson, General Manager Roger Stanton, County Supervisor and Vice Chair, Finance & Personnel Committee Pat McGuigan, Chair, Operations, Maintenance &Technical Services Committee Absent: None APPROVAL OF MINUTES. The minutes of the September 29, 1994 Steering Committee were approved as drafted. CLOSED SESSION Review Annual Performance Reviews of Senior Staff. The Steering Committee reviewed the performance of Senior Staff. Steering Committee Recommendation. After a review of Annual Performance Reviews of Senior Staff, the Committee directed staff to adjust the salaries of Senior Staff retroactive effective July 1, 1993 as discussed in Closed Session. The Committee observed that the personnel review process requires significant modifications and directed staff to develop a new review process for consideration and review by the Steering Committee at a future meeting. ADJOURNMENT. The Steering Committee adjourned at approximately 5:30 p.m. �xytloc�gm�extt�t1309a.¢�m C -r II County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California P.O.Box 8127 a 108"Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 MINUTES OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE NOVEMBER 30, 1994-5:30 P.M. A meeting of the Executive Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Wednesday, November 30, 1994, at 5:30 p.m., at the Districts'Administrative Offices. The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT: Present: Director Pat McGuigan Director Victor Leipzig John C. Cox, Jr. Joint Chair Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Peer A. Swan Vice Joint Chair& Kris Lindstrom, KIP. Lindstrom, Inc. Chair, District 14 Don R. Griffin Past Joint Chair STAFF PRESENT: William D. Mahoney Past Joint Chair Fred Barrera Chair, District 1 Blake P. Anderson, General Manager John Collins Chair, District 2 Gary Streed, Director of Finance Sal Sapien Chair, District 3 Gary Hasenslab, Director of Personnel ...i Jan Debay Chair, District 5 Margaret H. Nellor, Director of Technical James A. Wahner Chair, District 6 Services Barry Hammond Chair, District 7 John D. Linder, Director of Engineering Grace H. Winchell Chair, District 11 Ed Hodges, Director of Maintenance Bob Ooten, Director of Operations Absent: Steve Hovey, Manager, Information Services Ed Torres, Air Quality Manager John M. Gullixson Chair, District 13 Roger Stanton County Supervisor William Steiner County Supervisor STAFF OVERVIEW OF THE GENERAL MANAGER'S OFFICE. Blake Anderson provided an overview of the General Manager's Office. OVERVIEW OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL'S OFFICE. Tom Woodruff provided an overview of the General Counsel's office. APPROVAL OF MINUTES. The revised minutes of the October 26, 1994, Executive Committee were approved as drafted. Director Griffin abstained from the motion to approve. e, C Minutes of the Executive Committee November 30, 1994 Page 2 CONSIDERATION OF THE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE ACTIONS The Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee met on November 2, 1994. Enclosed is a copy of the Committee's draft meeting minutes. Following are the recommended action items: Operations. Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Recommendations. (a) Item (8): Approval to authorize the Phase III Biotrickling Filter Demonstration Project. (b) Item (9): Approval to authorize Addendum No. 2 to Professional Services Agreement with K.P. Lindstrom, Inc., for Environmental Consulting Services. Executive Committee Recommendation. The Executive Committee concurs with the recommendations of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee. CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE ACTIONS. The Planning, Design and Construction Committee met on November 3, 1994. Enclosed is a copy of the Committee's draft meeting minutes. Following are the recommended action items: Plannine. Design and Construction Committee Recommendations. A. Item 9(a): Referred staff recommendation to Executive Committee without comment to authorize scope of work and request for proposals to create a Strategic Information Systems Plan. B. Item (9): Approve Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers re Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38, and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43, providing for additional construction support services, at hourly rates including labor, overhead and profit, for the additional amount of $246,680, increasing the total authorized compensation from $2,519,165 to an amount not to exceed $2,762,845. C. Item (10): Approve Change Order No. 6 to the plans and specifications for Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-2, for an addition of $31,613 to the contract with Margate Construction, Inc., increasing the total authorized compensation from $14,341,891 to $14,373,504. D. Item 11 : Approve reimbursement agreement with Orange County Water District; approve recommendations included in report on prequalification of Membrane Diffuser Manufacturers; approve plans and specifications and any subsequent Minutes of the Executive Committee November 30, 1994 .� Page 3 addenda; and authorize General Manager to set a bid date, receive bids and recommend award of construction contract for Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36-2. Executive Committee Recommendation. The Executive Committee recommends the following: After a discussion, it was moved, seconded and duly carried that consideration of the items listed above be approved with the following changes: A. Item 9(a): Direct staff to prepare a scope of work for an Information systems Management Plan, develop a short list of firms with relevant expertise, request proposals and submit the best proposal to the Planning, Design and Construction Committee for approval and recommendation to the Joint Boards. Director Peer Swan requested that his opposition to the motion be made a matter of record. CONSIDERATION OF FINANCE AND PERSONNEL COMMITTEE ACTIONS The Finance and Personnel Committee met on November 16, 1994. Enclosed is a copy of the Committee's draft meeting minutes. Following were the recommended action items. A. Item 8 : Authorize staff to prepare a resolution to amend Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, to establish a conferral of leave policy. B. Item 13 : Approve Escrow Restructuring Program, Series 1992 Refunding Certificates of Participation. C. Item 16 : Approval of request from KPMG Peat Marwick LLP for an increase in the maximum fees for the 1993-94 financial audit from $46,800 plus expenses to $63,861 plus expenses, an increase of$17,061. D. Item 17 : Authorize proposed staffing changes for Plant Operations and approval of an amendment to the Classification and Compensation Resolution. Executive Committee Recommendations. The Executive Committee concurs with the recommendations of the Finance and Personnel Committee, with the exception of Item No. 13, Consideration of Escrow Restructuring Program, Series 1992 Refunding Certificates of Participation. This item was withdrawn by the Finance and Personnel Committee with a recommendation of no future action. Minutes of the Executive Committee November 30, 1994 Page 4 REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE SUBCOMMITTEE The Executive Subcommittee met on November 29, 1994, and provided an oral report to the Executive Committee. The final reports of the Emst&Young study re Phase 2 Capital Improvement Project Management Process Focused Improvement Study with Action Plans, and the Evaluation of Operations and Maintenance Functions were reviewed and future work by Ernst & Young was also considered. Executive Committee Recommendations. A. Receive and file the Ernst & Young's final reports re Phase 2 Capital Improvement Project Management Process Focused Improvement Study with Action Plans, and the Evaluation of Operations and Maintenance Functions. B. Direct staff to continue with an implementation plan of the 14 recommendations contained in the Capital Improvement Project Management Final Report and the 38 recommendations contained within the Evaluation of Operations and Maintenance Final Report and to report to the Executive Subcommittee on no less than quarterly basis. C. Approval of an Addendum to the Professional Services Agreement with Ernst & Young to perform the Financial Department Assessment, the Technical Services Department Assessment and the Phase I Performance Measurement and Improvement Plan in an amount not to exceed $158,000, increasing the total compensation authorized to an amount �..i not to exceed of$453,000. REPORT OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE The Steering Committee met on November 30, 1994, and reported on its activities consisting of a review of the performance of Senior management Staff. No recommendations were made to the Executive Committee. Steerino Committee Recommendation. After a review of Annual Performance Reviews of Senior Staff, the Committee directed staff to adjust the salaries of Senior Staff retroactive effective July 1, 1993 as discussed in Closed Session. The Committee observed that the personnel review process requires significant modifications and directed staff to develop a new review process for consideration and review by the Steering Committee at a future meeting. CLOSED SESSION The Chairman convened the Committee in closed session to consider authorizing employment of special counsel to appear and defend the interests of the Districts, in the matter of Complaint for Wrongful Death and Negligence, Andy C. Patterson; Jackie J. Venezio; Lacey Miller, a minor by and through her Guardian Ad Litem, Georgianne I. Miller, Dorothy M. R. Holm and as Executrix of the Estate of Richard L. Holm, vs. City of Huntington Beach, at. al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 738179, in connection with construction of Miscellaneous Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-49. After a discussion, the employment of Chase, Rotchford, Drukker& Bogus, as special counsel, was recommended by the Executive Committee. Minutes of the Executive Committee November 30, 1994 Page 5 OTHER BUSINESS. The Executive Committee made a motion, seconded and duly approved to have the Joint Boards provide a Resolution of Appreciation to Charles Egigian Nichols. ADJOURNMENT. The Executive Committee adjourned at approximately 8:20 p.m. rk ym Vmlexx�l130e ,. m v JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING w AGENDA FOR DECEMBER 14, 1994 Agenda Item (1 2)(b)(1 ): Consideration of Phase III BioFiltration Demonstration Project Summary In November 1992 and July 1994, the Boards of Directors authorized a Biofiltration Demonstration Project totalling $525,000 to evaluate the feasibility by applying biofiltration technology for the removal of volatile organic compounds, air toxics and odor-causing air pollutants present in publicly owned treatment works waste airstreams. The Districts have contributed $270,000, or 51% of the total project cost with the funding balance provided by the South Coast Air Quality Management District ($125,000), Southern California Edison ($80,000), and the Water Environment Research Foundation ($50,000). Staff is proposing to conduct a Phase III, 13-month study to evaluate the effectiveness of a pilot biofiltralion. Phase III of the project is estimated to cost $90,000. No additional funding is being requested for Phase III, which will be financed by a $75,000 grant from the Environmental Protection Agency(EPA) and $15,000 in unexpended funds from Phase II of the project. The $15,000 savings were realized as the result of staff negotiating free analytical services from the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), thus reducing our expenditures for outside contractual services. In support of the Phase III project and included in the $90,000 project budget, staff is also seeking authorization to execute an extension to a specific term employment agreement with Shabbir S. Basrai; to enter into a professional services agreement with Envirogen, Inc.; to procure contract analytical services as needed; and to enter into grant agreements with EPA and SCAQMD(as an agent for EPA)when the Phase III funding commitment has been approved and becomes available. A staff report regarding the Phase III project is attached. Executive Committee Recommendation 1. Authorize Phase III of the demonstration project for an amount not to exceed $90,000 with the revised costs shown below: Vo' wpd=WxmVbd13b1 Revised Proposed Phase Proposed Total �.,.� Budget Item Phases I & II III Authorization Authorization Staffing $205,000 $42,000 $247,000 Equipment $15,000 $10,000 $25,000 Supplies $18,000 $4,500 $22,500 Travel $7,500 $3,000 $10,500 Contracts $264,500• $30,500 $295,000 Totals $510,000 $90,000 $600,000 'The revised amount reflects [$15,000] for analytical services. 2. Authorize staff to execute an extension to the temporary specific-term employment agreement with Shabbir S. Basrai for engineering services for an additional ten months, to extend from April 10. 1995 to February 10, 1996, for a revised total of 33.5 months. This includes an increase of$41,236 for the biofiltration study, at an increase in the hourly rate from $21.63 to$23.79, increasing the authorized maximum from $89,000 to $130,236. �.d 3. Authorize staff to enter into an agreement with Envirogen, Inc., for Phase III demonstrating project services for an amount not to exceed $17,500. 4. Authorize staff to procure the needed additional contract analytical services, or amend existing contracts, to conduct necessary testing pertaining to microbiological and chemical analyses required for Phase III. 5. Authorize staff to enter into grant agreements with the EPA and/or SCAQMD (as an agent for EPA)when Phase III commitments and grant funding levels have been established and approved by said organizations. wpdmc exmV W12E1 -2- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS al ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 1 October 25, 1994 0 Po Box Bin IIE na EUIS AWN FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 8272 127 �.►� n+maezxn STAFF REPORT PHASE III: BIOTRICKLING FILTER DEMONSTRATION PROJECT Summary In November 1992 and July 1994, the Boards of Directors authorized staff to participate in the Biofiltration Demonstration Project to evaluate the feasibility of applying biofiltration technology for the removal of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), air toxics and odor-causing air pollutants present in our waste airstreams. The purpose of the project is to develop an air pollution control technology that can meet the air toxic and VOC emission reductions mandated in existing and future regulations at the federal, state and local levels, and at the same time provide a more cost-effective air quality control strategy. The Districts' current strategy for controlling odor- causing emissions utilizes packed-tower scrubbers that have high annual costs and are ineffective in controlling air toxics and VOC emissions. Biotreatment technologies, which include biofilters, bioscrubbers and biotrickling filters, adopt a natural process wherein the biodegradable contaminants present in the waste airstream serve as a food source for the microorganisms present on the biotreatment media. Biotreatment media for biofilters would commonly be a compost material made from yard waste or sewage sludge, for biotrickling filters it would be a synthetic plastic ball or packing, or natural-occurring rock. Biotreatment technologies have lower operations and maintenance requirements than other technologies. The only mechanical equipment (which have high maintenance and energy demands) required is a fan to push air through the unit and since chemicals are not utilized (or used to a limited extent) for treatment, monitoring of process control is significantly reduced as well as material costs. Therefore, biotreatment technologies may be a cost-effective alternative to traditional chemical treatment technologies like packed-tower scrubbers. Our current Biofiltration Demonstration Project involves two phases. Phase I, which was completed in June 1994, demonstrated that biofiltration is a feasible technology to remove the extremely low concentrations of air toxics and VOCs present in our waste airstreams, while effectively removing nearly 100% of the odor-causing emissions. Phase 11, which is scheduled to be completed in February 1995, is focusing on the time period for treatment of the air contaminants in the biofilter. Upon completing Phase 11, staff will have enough information on biofiltration to design and construct a full-scale unit. However, before the Districts consider constructing a full-scale biofilter for removing VOCs, air toxics or odors, other biotreatment technologies such as biotrickling filters that potentially could be constructed at lower capital costs, should be evaluated for their feasibility and cost-effectiveness. Staff did not propose to study biotrickling fitter technology in 1992 because this technology was in its infancy stage and no pilot-scale demonstration unit had been developed. The evaluation of biotrickling filters applicability is partiwlarly significant for the Districts as the four trickling fillers used for secondary treatment of wastewater at Reclamation Plant No. 1 in Fountain Valley and the 33 packed-tower scrubbers that treat foul air at both plants could possibly be modified to operate as full-scale biotrickling filters. The use of existing facilities could have significant capital savings. Staff is proposing to conduct a Phase III, 13-month study to evaluate the effectiveness of a pilot biotrickling filter. The information obtained from this study will provide the Districts with beneficial information on selection and design of the most cost-effective biotreatment technology for control of VOCs, air toxics and odors. The Districts are proposing to team with Envirogen, Inc., a leading biotechnology-based environmental engineering company. Envirogen will be supplying a skid-mounted pilot demonstration trickling filter that will be located adjacent to the existing biofiltration demonstration facility and studied when operating under varying conditions. Envirogen will provide two-and-one-half days of on-site engineering support during the start-up of the biotrickling filter and some limited engineering/technical support, principally through phone dialogues and written correspondence throughout the term of the project. The total not-to- exceed cost for Envirogen's services is $17,500. The primary day-to-day management of the biotrickling filter demonstration study will be the responsibility of the Districts and accomplished by Shabbir S. Basrai, a chemical engineer on contract to the Districts through a specific-term employment agreement. His responsibilities will include: monitoring; data collection; chemical, physical and microbiological sampling; coordination with other Districts' department staff; management of subcontractors; and recordkeeping and reporting. Fiscal Impacts Phase III of the project is estimated to cost$90,000. No additional funding is being requested for Phase III,which will be financed by a grant from U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and unexpended funds from Phase II of the project as discussed below. The Boards of Directors have authorized Phases I and II of the Biofiltration Demonstration Project for an amount not to exceed $525,000. The Districts' authorized contribution to Phases I and II is $270,000, or 51% of the total project cost. The balance of the demonstration project funding is made up by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAOMD)—$125,000, Southern California Edison (SCE)--$60,000, and the Water Environment Research Foundation (WERF)—$50,000. The not-to-exceed estimated cost for the Phase III study is $90,000, which will be funded from a $75,000 grant from USEPA and $15,000 in unexpended funds from Phase It. During Phase II of the biofiltration study, staff was successful in negotiating free analytical services from SCAQMD, thus reducing our expenditures for outside contractual services. This has resulted in a savings of approximately$15,000 from the $145,000 authorized for Phase II. Table 1 lists the proposed total demonstration project budget by line item for all three phases, and Table 2 lists the proposed funding for the demonstration project. Recommendations Contingent upon a minimum outside funding commitment of$75,000 for Phase III of the demonstration project, staff recommends that the following actions be taken by the Boards of Directors: 1. Authorize Phase III of the demonstration project for an amount not-to-exceed $90,000. The proposed revised costs and funding are as follows: 2 Y Table 1: Total Demonstration Project Budget Revised Proposed Phase Proposed Total Budget Item Phases I & II III Authorization Authorization Staffing $205,000 $42,000 $247.000 Equipment $15,000 $10,000 $25,000 Supplies $18,000 $4,500 $22.500 Travel $7,500 $3,000 $10,500 Contracts $264,500' $30,500 $295,000 Totals. $510,000 $90,000 $600,000 'The revised amount reflects [$15,000] for analytical services. Table 2: Demonstration Project Funding `..� Phases I & II Proposed Source Existing Unencumbered Proposed Total Phases I & II Funds Phase III Funding SCAQMD $125,000 - - $125,000 SCE $ 80,000 - - $ 80,000 WERF $ 50,000 - - $ 50,000 USEPA - - $ 75,000 $ 75,000 Subtotal Outside $255,000 - $ 75,000 $330,000 Funding CSDOC $270,000 [15,000] $ 15,000' $270,000 Totals $525,000 [15,000] $ 90,000 $600,000 Funds to be utilized from unexpended funds from Phase II of the biofiltration study. 3 2. Authorize staff to execute an extension to the temporary specific-term employment agreement with Shabbir S. Basrai for engineering services for an additional ten months, to extend from April 10, 1995 to February 10, 1996, for a revised total of 33.5 months. This includes an increase of$41,236 for the biotrickling filter study, at an increase in the hourly rate from $21.63 to$23.79, increasing the authorized maximum from $89,000 to $130,236. 3. Authorize staff to enter into an agreement with Envirogen, Inc., for Phase III demonstration project services for an amount not to exceed $17,500. 4. Authorize staff to procure the needed additional contract analytical services, or amend existing contracts, to conduct necessary testing pertaining to microbiological and chemical analyses required for Phase III for an estimated cost of$23,000. 5. Authorize staff to enter into grant agreements with the USEPA and/or SCAQMD(as agent for USEPA)when Phase III commitments and grant funding levels have been established and approved by said organizations. MHN/EMT:ahh Ref#440199.rp 4 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING AGENDA FOR DECEMBER 14, 1994 Agenda Item (12)(b)(2): Consideration of Addendum No. 2 to Professional Services Agreement with K.P. Lindstrom, Inc., for Environmental Consulting Services Summary In October 1990, the Directors approved a two-year professional services agreement with KP. Lindstrom, Inc., in the amount of$164,000 to provide the technical support services in a number of areas including the ocean discharge permit renewal, ocean monitoring program, water reclamation, water conservation, biosolids, legislative and regulatory reviews, environmental impact reports and facilities planning. The agreement was amended in December 1992 for an additional two years, with a maximum amount not to exceed $295,500. Because the activities which the consultant supports are ongoing, staff is recommending that the agreement be extended for an additional two years beginning January 1995 at a cost of $207,500. The amended agreement for the six-year contract period would, therefore, not exceed $503,000. A staff report regarding the proposed addendum to the professional services agreement is attached. Executive Committee Recommendation Approve Addendum No. 2 to Professional Services Agreement with K.P. Lindstrom, Inc., for Environmental Consulting Services for a two-year period beginning January 1995 to a total amount not to exceed $207,500, for a total contract amount not to exceed $503,000. wPdmwe) '0W12b2 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS October 25, 1994 of ORANGE COUNTY. CAUFORNIA ' I-'-Ews AWN PO BOX 6127 STAFF REPORT FWWAINVaLEr.uuFOPNUSi? B 127 nlm982x11 CONSIDERATION OF PHASE III BIOFILTRATION DEMONSTRATION PROJECT Summary In November 1992 and July 1994, the Boards of Directors authorized staff to participate in the Biofiltration Demonstration Project to evaluate the feasibility of applying biofiltration technology for the removal of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), air toxins and odor-causing air pollutants present in our waste airstreams. The purpose of the project is to develop an air pollution control technology that can meet the air toxic and VOC emission reductions mandated in existing and future regulations at the federal, state and local levels, and at the same time provide a more cost-effective air quality control strategy. The Districts' current strategy for controlling odor- causing emissions utilizes packed-tower scrubbers that have high annual costs and are ineffective in controlling air toxins and VOC emissions. Biotreatment technologies, which include biofilters, bioscrubbers and biotrickling filters, adopt a natural process wherein the biodegradable contaminants present in the waste airstream serve as a food source for the microorganisms present on the biolreatment media. Biotreatment media for biofilters would commonly be a compost material made from yard waste or sewage sludge, for biotrickling filters it would be a synthetic plastic ball or packing, or natural-occurring rock. Biotreatment technologies have lower operations and maintenance requirements than other technologies. The only mechanical equipment (which have high maintenance and energy demands) required is a fan to push air through the unit and since chemicals are not utilized (or used to a limited extent) for treatment, monitoring of process control is significantly reduced as well as material costs. Therefore, biolreatment technologies may be a cost-effective alternative to traditional chemical treatment technologies like packed-tower scrubbers. Our current Biofiltration Demonstration Project involves two phases. Phase I, which was completed in June 1994, demonstrated that biofiltration is a feasible technology to remove the extremely low concentrations of air toxics and VOCs present in our waste airstreams, while effectively removing neatly 100% of the odor-causing emissions. Phase II, which is scheduled to be completed in February 1995, is focusing on the time period for treatment of the air contaminants in the biofilter. Upon completing Phase II, staff will have enough information on biofiltration to design and construct a full-scale unit. However, before the Districts consider constructing a full-scale biofilter for removing VOCs, air loxics or odors, other biolreatment technologies such as biotrickling filters that potentially could be constructed at lower capital costs, should be evaluated for their feasibility and cost-effectiveness. Staff did not propose to study biotrickling filter technology in 1992 because this technology was in its infancy stage and no pilot-scale demonstration unit had been developed. The evaluation of biotrickling filters applicability is particularly significant for the Districts as the four trickling filters used for secondary treatment of wastewater at Reclamation Plant No. 1 in Fountain Valley and the 33 packed-tower scrubbers that treat foul air at both plants could possibly be modified to operate as full-scale biotrickling filters. The use of existing facilities could have significant capital savings. Staff is proposing to conduct a Phase III, 13-month study to evaluate the effectiveness of a pilot biotrickling filter. The information obtained from this study will provide the Districts with 1 Staff is proposing to conduct a Phase III, 13-month study to evaluate the effectiveness of a pilot biotrickling filler. The information obtained from this study will provide the Districts with beneficial information on selection and design of the most cost-effective biotreatment technology for control of VOCs, air toxics and odors. The Districts are proposing to team with Envirogen, Inc., a leading biotechnology-based environmental engineering company. Envirogen will be supplying a skid-mounted pilot demonstration trickling filler that will be located adjacent to the existing biofiltration demonstration facility and studied when operating under varying conditions. Envirogen will provide two-and-one-half days of on-site engineering support during the start-up of the biotrickling filter and some limited engineeringl ethnical support, principally through phone dialogues and written correspondence throughout the term of the project. The total not-to- exceed cost for Envirogen's services is$17,500. The primary day-to-day management of the biotrickling filter demonstration study will be the responsibility of the Districts and accomplished by Shabbir S. Basrai, a chemical engineer on contract to the Districts through a specific-tern employment agreement. His responsibilities will include: monitoring; data collection; chemical, physical and microbiological sampling; coordination with other Districts' department staff; management of subcontractors; and recordkeeping and reporting. Fiscal Impacts Phase III of the project is estimated to cost$90,000. No additional funding is being requested for Phase III, which will be financed by a grant from U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and unexpended funds from Phase II of the project as discussed below. The Boards of Directors have authorized Phases I and II of the Biofiltration Demonstration Project for an amount not to exceed $525,000. The Districts' authorized contribution to Phases I and It is $270,000, or 51% of the total project cost. The balance of the demonstration project funding is made up by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD)—$125,000, Southern California Edison (SCE)--$80,000, and the Water Environment Research Foundation (WERF),$50,000. The not-to-exceed estimated cost for the Phase III study is $90,000, which will be funded from a $75,000 grant from USEPA and $15,000 in unexpended funds from Phase ll. During Phase II of the biofiltration study, staff was successful in negotiating free analytical services from SCAQMD, thus reducing our expenditures for outside contractual services. This has resulted in a savings of approximately$15,000 from the $145,000 authorized for Phase It. Table 1 lists the proposed total demonstration project budget by line item for all three phases, and Table 2 lists the proposed funding for the demonstration project. Recommendations Contingent upon a minimum outside funding commitment of$75,000 for Phase III of the demonstration project, staff recommends that the following actions be taken by the Boards of Directors: 1. Authorize Phase III of the demonstration project for an amount not-to-exceed $90,000. The proposed revised costs and funding are as follows: Table 1: Total Demonstration Project Budget 2 Revised Proposed Phase Proposed Total Budget Item Phases I & II III Authorization Authorization Staffing $205,000 $42,000 $247,000 Equipment $15,000 $10,000 $25,000 Supplies $18,000 $4,500 $22,500 Travel $7,500 $3,000 $10,500 Contracts $264,500' $30,500 $295,000 Totals $510,000 $90,000 $600,000 'The revised amount reflects [$15,000] for analytical services. Table 2: Demonstration Project Funding Phases I & II Proposed Source Existing Unencumbered Proposed Total Phases I & 11 Funds Phase III Funding SCAOMD $125,000 - - $125,000 SCE $ 80,000 - - $ 80,000 WERF $ 50,000 - - $ 50,000 USEPA - - $ 75,000 $75,000 Subtotal Outside $255,000 - $75,000 $330,000 Funding CSDOC $270,000 [15,000] $ 15,000' $270,000 Totals $525,000 [15,000] $ 90,000 $600,000 Funds to be utilized from unexpended funds from Phase II of the biofiltration study. 3 , 2. Authorize staff to execute an extension to the temporary specific-term employment agreement with Shabbir S. Basrai for engineering services for an additional ten months, to extend from April 10, 1995 to February 10, 1996, for a revised total of 33.5 months. This includes an increase of$41,236 for the biotrichling filter study, at an increase in the hourly rate from $21.63 to$23.79, increasing the authorized maximum from $89,000 to $130,236. 3. Authorize staff to enter into an agreement with Envirogen, Inc., for Phase III demonstration project services for an amount not to exceed $17,500. 4. Authorize staff to procure the needed additional contract analytical services, or amend existing contracts, to conduct necessary testing pertaining to microbiological and chemical analyses required for Phase III for an estimated cost of$23,000. 5. Authorize staff to enter into grant agreements with the USEPA and/or SCAQMD (as agent for USEPA)when Phase III commitments and grant funding levels have been established and approved by said organizations. MHN/EMT:ahh Ref*440199.rp 4 1 s�,,,r.rron4j i Y 11 9 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 9 q4 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 �I 10844 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 _III c4�wcecW"� (714)962-2411 ecenn er 0, IY94 Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Ca 92708 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with K.P. Lindstrom, Inc. for Environmental Consulting Services In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional engineering services, the Operation, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee (OMTS) has negotiated the following fee for Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with K.P. Lindstrom, Inc. providing for environmental consulting services in connection 1..✓ with ocean discharge permit renewal, ocean monitoring program, water reclamation, water conservation, biosolids, legislative and regulatory reviews, environmental impact reports and facilities planning, on an hourly rate basis including labor plus overhead, plus subconsultants fees, and fixed profit, in an additional amount not to exceed $207,500 per year for two years with a total contract amount not to exceed $503,00. Existing Change per Amended Agreement Addn. No. 2 Agreement Engineering Services Direct labor based on hourly rates including profit and $253,500 $172,500 $426,000 overhead. Direct Expenses $32,000 $25,000 $57,000 Subconsultants Fees, not to exceed $10,000 $20,000 TOTAL AMENDED CONTRACT, not to exceed $295,500 $207,500 S5039000 Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts of Orange County December 2, 1994 Page Two The OMTS Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. /s/Pat Mc Guigan /s/Victor Leipzig Director McGuigan, Chair Director Leipzig, Vice Chair OMTS Committee OMTS Committee /s/Margaret H. Nellor Margaret H. Nellor Director of Technical Services OMTS Committee REF#J:\W P\MW\410105XTR RESOLUTION NO. 94-146 APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH K. P. LINDSTROM, INC. FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SERVICES A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH K. P. LINDSTROM, INC. FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SERVICES PROVIDING FOR A TWO-YEAR EXTENSION OF SAID AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore entered into an agreement with K. P. Lindstrom, Inc. for environmental consulting services to assist staff on NPDES Permit activities; regulatory and legislative liaison activities; and for technical support for sludge management, air quality, reclamation and conservation issues and in connection with CEOA compliance for Master Plan projects; and, WHEREAS, Addendum No. 1 to said agreement provided for a two-year extension of said agreement; and, WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to further amend said agreement to provide for a two-year extension of said agreement; and, WHEREAS, the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee has negotiated and certified a fee for said additional services, in accordance with established procedures for the selection of professional services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Addendum No. 2 dated December 14, 1994, to that certain Professional Services Agreement dated October 10, 1990, by and between County Sanitation District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, and K. P. Lindstrom, Inc. for environmental consulting services to assist staff on NPDES Permit activities; regulatory and legislative liaison activities; and for technical support for sludge management, air quality, reclamation and conservation issues and in connection with CEOA compliance for Master Plan projects, providing for a two-year extension of the agreement, is hereby approved and accepted; �✓ and, a Section 2. That the contract provision for fees be increased by an amount not to exceed $207,500.00, as follows, which increases the total authorized compensation from $295,500.00 to an amount not to exceed $503,000.00: Existing Change per Amended Agreement Addendum No. 2 Agreement Professional services, at hourly rates for direct labor, including overhead and profit, not to exceed $253,500 $172,500 $426,000 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 32,000 25,000 57,000 Subconsultant Fee., not to exceed 10,000 -0- 20,000 TOTAL, not to exceed $295,500 $207,500 $503,000 Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Addendum No. 2 in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held December 14, 1994. PADiJJ46 i JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING AGENDA FOR DECEMBER 14, 1994 Agenda Item (12)(b)(3): Consideration authorizing staff to prepare a scope of work for a Strategic Information Systems Plan Summary Attached is a Staff Report on proposed design of a Strategic Information Systems Plan developed by Management Information Systems staff that was presented to the Planning, Design and Construction Committee at their November 3, 1994 meeting. The need for this plan is addressed in Ernst & young's Phase III projects. The scope of the original Information Services Master Plan has been exhausted and a new plan is needed to reflect the changing needs of the Districts, along with changes in technology. The report addresses the Districts' immediate needs in such a way as to be coherent with the long- term solution while at the same time not prejudicing the long-range solution. Executive Committee Recommendation Authorize staff to prepare a scope of work for a Strategic Information Systems Plan, developing a short list of firms with expertise in development of such plans to submit proposals for a Professional Services Agreement, for consideration by the Boards at a future meeting. %pd=NeMecVW12b3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS o d ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 109N ELL19 AVENUE November 10, 1994 Po.eox e19> F0UNruNVLLLEr.cauroeMA981 W27 0141962- 11 STAFF REPORT REOUESTFOR AUTHORIZATION TO DESIGN A STRATEGIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS PLAN SUMMARY The Information Services Division was created in late 1989 to provide focal point for the Districts management of its computer hardware,software and telephone needs. An Information Services Master Plan was introduced in 1991 to cover a 3 to 5 year time span. Districts staff has recognized that the scope of this original plan has been exhausted and a new plan is needed to reflect the changing needs of the Districts along with changes in technology. In its July 25, 1994 letter recommending Phase III projects, Ernst & Young included the Development of a Strategic Information Systems Plan as number 6 in its list of 10 projects. The purpose of this report is to request the consideration of the Joint Boards in moving ahead with this recommendation as soon as critical details can be worked out. However,because of the time involved in formulating a complete game- plan and critical needs that require timely solutions,it is necessary to bring some specific issues to the Board for approval prior to the completion of such a Plan. Staff recommends that the Committee direct staff to prepare a scope of work for a Strategic Information Systems Plan,develop a short list of firms with expertise in developing Strategic Information Systems Plans, request proposals, and submit the best proposal to the Committee for approval and recommendation to the Joint Boards to award a Professional Services Agreement. Staff further recommends that all future Districts' Facility Master Plans automatically include the production of an updated Strategic Information Systems Plans. WHY AN INFORMATION SERVICES MASTER PLAN NOW? Some have questioned the need for a IS Master Plan,especially since so many decisions have already been made and systems installed which would appear to establish a momentum in a particular direction which would be too late to redirect,itnecessary. In other words,aren't we already too far down a particular path to be able to backup anyway! Ina word,NO. The Districts needs,combined with constantly evolving technology show that few, if any,turns in the road to the future are true"dead ends". Just as the Districts,as a whole, need a Master Plan even though the treatment plants are already constructed,Information Services needs a Master Plan, even though certain computers and software systems have already been installed. Needs change, systems evolve, hardware wears out or is outgrown due to changing needs, etc. The dollar cost of the computer hardware, computer software and telecommunication infrastructure of hubs, bridges, routers, switches,and cabling—all must be viewed as being only a tiny part of the true dollar value of the information that is being managed. Information Services staff will benefit from a Master Plan that can help assure that the needs of the future,as perceived by the rest of the agency and tested by an outside consultant,is being addressed properly by the long-range plans of the Information Services Division. For instance,many agree that a more robust network is needed to support an agency-wide Financial Information System—regardless of what system is eventually chosen and what computer hardware platform is selected. Other questions include;should the IS Division move towards greater vendor independence,and B Go,in what way? Should CSDOC move towards connection with the Internet and the National Information Infrastructure? If so,in what way and to what benefit? Is the existing Information Services Division structure appropriate to perform the functions they are performing? Is the IS Division positioned within the agency in such a manner to provide optimum support to all Departments and Divisions equally? Should the organization be more hierarchical or less? \W/ 4 These and many other issues would be addressed in a Strategic Information Systems Master Plan. The fact that some recent purchases have occurred is only reflective of the fact that on-going work must proceed and l� cannotwail for protracted studies. To remain proactive and to recognize emerging opportunities, it is important to have a coherent view to the future. BACKGROUND In 1990 staff prepared an Information Services Master Plan which was accepted in principle by the Joint Boards in June 1991. This IS Master Plan was based on the following: 1. The concepts addressed in Volume 5 of the 2020 Vision Master Plan concerning plant process data handling and control. 2. Computer hardware, software and networking standards and capabilities which was current as of 1991. 3. What was presently installed at the Districts. 4. The short and long-term Office Automation needs perceived by Districts staff. It was recognized early in 1993 by the Information Services staff that this IS Master Plan would need to be rewritten in a more comprehensive way,taking into consideration changes in Districts' needs, changing technology and a revised understanding of the issues addressed in 2020 Vision relative to plant automation. However, it was also recognized that to be rmmipdete and armor rat», an Information Systems Master Plan for the Districts ovrst be a complement to the Districts' Master Plan. Unfortunately, the 2020 Vision Master Plan, as completed in 1989, did not include necessary components to address such things as Office Automation, management infrastructure, levels of direct and indirect supporting staff, and so on. (Direct supporting staff would be in Operations and Maintenance. Indirect supporting staff would be such divisions as Information Services, Management Support, Personnel and so on.) Updating the 2020 Vision Master Plan has been discussed in one forum or another since late last year. These discussions led Information Services staff to postpone plans for doing a major Information Systems Master Plan rewrite. In January of this year, Information Services solicited a proposal from KPMG Peat Marwick to produce an Information Systems Master Plan. For various reasons KPMG's proposal was never followed up by staff. Now, however, the Districts' growing systems needs, which are an outgrowth of many current projects, are requiring Information Services to make decisions which would best be addressed as part of a comprehensive IS Master Plan. Solving these needs cannot wait for a lengthy study of long-term solutions without seriously constraining other projects and tasks at the Districts. An example is one need being submitted as a separate agenda item to this Committee; the capacity limitations of the VAX computer cluster for the Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS) and Computerized Maintenance Management Systems(CMMS). Another issue (addressed by Gartner Group, Ernst & Young and Deloitte &Touche)is the need for a comprehensive broadband network solution. Our challenge will be to address these immediate needs in such a way as to be coherent with the long range solution while at the same time not prejudicing the long range solution. The best approach to designing an IS Master Plan is to use an outside firm. For example, Ernst & Young has recommended the development of a Strategic Information Systems Plan. The objective stated that this project would develop a ten-year plan that identifies the administrative and plant operations systems needed to support the strategic direction of the Districts. This document would identify a strategic architecture,needed functionality of software, high-level cost estimates, and mandatory interfaces. The approach recommended was that Ernst & Young would lead this effort with technical assistance in the plant automation area. They 'would work with key management, the Board and end-users to determine the information and delivery systems needed to achieve the Districts mission and Vision 2020'. Existing 2 work such as the C112M Hill analyses would be incorporated to avoid duplication of effort. The estimated �i cost for Ernst & young to complete this work was $80,000 and the work was estimated to take three months to complete. Since an IS Master Plan has been foremost in the thoughts of the staff of Information Services Division since 1993, staff supports this concept. Many consulting firms are well-qualified to conduct such a study, and Ernst & young is among the leaders. Staff agrees with Ernst & Young that in areas such as plant automation that other technical assistance may be needed. Ernst & young might also benefit from outside technical assistance in at least one additional area, broadband networking and wide-area networks. The rapid advance of high technology has been so dramatic that a more realistic time span for coverage by the plan would be 3-5 years. Projections beyond 5 years are not made within the computer industry by even the most visionary of experts. Staff, therefore, recommends a five-year time period for the scope of work. Staff requests the completion of such a study as soon as possible as several critical tasks await solutions in a number of areas. Immediate, short-term solutions will not necessarily commit the Districts to any path which cannot be redirected at a later date, if necessary. Some of these solutions cannot wait for lengthy studies to be completed. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Committee direct staff to prepare a scope of work for a Strategic Information Systems Plan, develop a short list of firms with expertise in developing Strategic Information Systems Plans, request proposals,and submit the best proposal to the Committee for approval and recommendation to the Joint Boards to award a Professional Services Agreement. Staff further recommends that all future Districts' Facility Master Plans automatically include the production of an updated Strategic Information Systems Plans. V 3 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING AGENDA FOR DECEMBER 14, 1994 Agenda Item (12)(b)(4): Consideration of Staff Recommendation to Approve Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with John Car0110 Engineers re Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38, and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2.43. Summary See attached Staff Report dated November 14, 1994, for more detailed information. Executive Committee Recommendation Receive and file Planning, Design and Construction Committee certification, and approve Addendum No. 4, to the Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38, and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P243, providing for additional construction support services at hourly rates including labor, overhead and profit, for the additional amount of $246,680, increasing the total authorized compensation from $2,519,165 to an amount not to exceed $2,762,545. L-7=1--T1 1]E4 ' COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS i' of ORANGE COUNTY. CAUFORNIA ' 1O ELL16AVENUE November 14, 1994 PO BOX 0127 `J FOOMAIN VALLEY.CALIFOFINY 927 &8127 MC 962- 11 STAFF REPORT Pr000sed Addendum No. 4 to Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers re Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1 Job No. P1-38, and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2 Job No. P2-43 On June 12, 1991, the Boards awarded a Professional Services Agreement to John Carollo Engineers in the amount of$1,914,815 to provide engineering services for the design of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38, and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P243. Both projects included over 100 relatively small miscellaneous improvements to various facilities throughout the two treatment plants. Three addenda have previously been authorized for this contract. Addendum No. 1 provided for a change in the wording for the errors and omissions insurance coverage with no change in the contract amount. Addendum No. 2 provided for a number of additional tasks deemed necessary that could most .. effectively be completed through this design contract. Addendum No. 2 added $76,750.00. Addendum No. 3 provided for additional design services to complete the seismic retrofit of nonstructural items at both treatment plants and to incorporate small scope changes to meet operational and aesthetic needs identified during the design phase. Addendum No. 3 added $527,600.00. The total amended contract amount is $2,519,165.00. In the Districts' original Request for Proposal, construction support services were requested providing for a minimum of 2500 hours. John Carollo Engineers submitted the minimum number of hours with their proposal for a total value of$211,936.80. The minimum hours requested in the proposal was set by Districts' staff. This budget is anticipated to be expended by late 1994, based on the billings for construction support received to date and the typical cost expended monthly. JCE provides construction support in direct response to requests by Districts' staff. These services typically include attendance at project meetings, review of contractor shop drawing submittals, response to requests for plan clarification, preparation of change-order technical materials and review of change-order costs. The level of services required for a project depends on the complexity of the project and the time for construction completion. The miscellaneous projects are complex because of the many independent items that are modified at each plant, involving a significant amount of .. equipment, piping, electrical and instrumentation work. These projects had higher quantities of mechanical, electrical and control systems than a project with large amounts of concrete and foundation work, such as clarifiers or digesters. These miscellaneous projects require a higher amount of construction support services due to the variety of equipment and conditions that each portion of the projects entails. For each construction contract, a proportionately larger number of shop drawings are submitted for the numerous various components of all the systems as compared to a larger project with similar components. For example, the large secondary expansion project (with a construction value of$14,496,000) provides five types of pumps, while three miscellaneous construction projects (with a construction value of$11,434,000) will provide fourteen types of pumps, each with a separate set of shop drawings and performance data submittal, needing careful engineering review. In addition, each pump system (as with all constructed systems) requires testing and start-up for which consultant services are required. The design work for these miscellaneous projects is divided into five separate construction contracts (three of which have already been bid). JCE has been providing construction support since April 1993 when the first Miscellaneous Projects, Job No. P243-1, was awarded. Construction is anticipated to extend through February 1995 for projects presently in construction. Two additional projects have yet to be awarded for construction that are presently in design under this design contract. Each new construction contract will create additional demands for consultant time for attending construction meetings, reviewing shop drawings and responding to design questions. Additional construction services are also required due to the time extensions of the construction contracts. One contract is beyond the original contract period and the other two construction contracts are likely to extend beyond their contract period. The time extensions equate to more construction support required from the consultant. Staff evaluated the need for additional construction support and start-up services and recommended to the Planning, Design and Construction Committee that negotiations be authorized for Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38, and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43. Staff has negotiated with John Carollo Engineers for additional construction services to be provided on an hourly basis as needed to support construction activities with a maximum limit on the hours. The original estimate presented at the previous Planning, Design and Construction Committee meeting only included estimated costs to provide additional construction support services for the projects currently under construction. Staff has negotiated with the consultant for these additional construction support services as well as additional support services that will be necessary in the future when the seismic retrofit projects (Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Plant No. 1, Job No. P143, and Seismic Retrofit of Non-structural Systems at Plant No. 2, Job No. 132-50) are constructed. For the projects currently in construction, staff has negotiated the total estimated additional labor hours necessary at a maximum of 1070 hours at an average billing rate of$26.85. For the two seismic retrofit projects, staff has negotiated the total estimated labor hours necessary at a maximum of 1850 hours at an average billing rate of$30.25, The average billing rate for the seismic retrofit projects is higher due to the need for construction support services from more senior members of the JCE staff who worked on and are intimately familiar with the structural design for the seismic supports. These hours are a negotiated estimate and only the hours of service actually provided will be paid. Overhead and profit will be paid only on the hours of service provided. The seismic retrofit projects are different from typical construction projects in that field fitting of the seismic supports will be required. This will require support by the consultant to ensure that the intent of the restraint is maintained. The value of the construction work is relatively low when compared to the cost to pay the consultant to design every small variation to the typical supports developed. Therefore, it is more cost effective to address the issues in the field with the contractor and the designer. With a negotiated overhead rate of 166% applied to hourly wages for services provided and profit at 9.5% applied to wages plus overhead, which equates to 291% total overhead and profit applied to wages only, the total estimated cost for providing the 1070 hours for the projects presently under construction is $83,680, and the total estimated cost for providing 1850 hours for the seismic retrofit projects is $163,000. The total estimated cost for Addendum No. 4 is $246,680. Construction support services provided under this Professional Services Agreement awarded in 1991, including subsequent approved addenda, were contracted at hourly rates plus 160% for overhead and 14%for profit which equates to a total overhead and profit of 296% applied to wages only. The negotiated overhead rate of 166% is below John Carollo Engineers' current calculated overhead rate of 172%. The negotiations resulted in a split between the original overhead rate of 160% and their current rate. Addendum No. 4 does not provide for a fixed profit to be earned at the completion of services. Rather, the profit will be paid only on services provided and the consultant only provides services at the direct request of the Districts. Thus, the possibility exists that the consultant will not earn the full potential profit allowed in the addendum budget. The following breakdown represents the results of the negotiations. Proposed Existing Change Proposed Agreement per Amended As Amended Addn Nn_ 4 Agreement Engineering Services, direct labor at hourly rates plus overhead at 156%, not to exceed $1,860,159.20 0.00 $1,860,159.20 Construction Support Services and 0&M Manual Preparation, direct labor at hourly rates plus overhead at 160%, not to exceed 223,425.80 0.00 223,425.80 Construction Support Services, at hourly rates including labor plus overhead at 166%and profit at 9.5%, not to exceed 0.00 246,680.00 246,680.00 Direct Expenses, at cost, not to exceed 111,690.00 0.00 111,690.00 Subconsultants, not to exceed 34,200.00 0.00 34,200.00 Fixed Profit 7Ra,fi90 0n O 0 98Q,690.no Total Contract, not to exceed s9 5tg15F 0 s24a_aRann s9 ata 1as on Staff Recommendation Approve Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers re Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38, and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43, providing for additional construction support services. i:W,pdw%pdc94\11394-sr.e9 1 / „rr.,r°°° COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS `'$ OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ” P.O. BOX 8127.FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 ° y �, 10844 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 �4te c°�� (714)962-2411 November 3, 1994 Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,California 92708 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Addendum No.4 to Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for Additional Design Services in Connection with Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1,Job P1-38,and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No.2,Jab No. P2-43 In accordance with the Districts'procedures for selection of professional services,the Planning,Design and Construction Committee has negotiated the following fee with John Carollo Engineers for Addendum No.4 to the Professional Services Agreement for additional construction support services,on an hourly-rate basis,including labor plus overhead and fixed profit,in an amount not to exceed$246,680.00. Existing Change per Amended V..� Agreement Addn. No.4 Agreement Engineering Services,direct labor at hourly rates plus overhead at 156%, not to exceed $1,860,159.20 $ 0.00 $1,860,159.20 Construction Support Services and O&M Manual Preparation, direct labor at hourly rates plus overhead at 160%, not to exceed 223,425.80 0.00 223,425.80 Construction Support Services, at hourly rates including labor, overhead at 166%and profit at 9.5%, not to exceed 246,680.00 246,680.00 Direct Expenses,at cost, not to exceed 111,690.00 0.00 111,690.00 Subconsultants, not to exceed 34,200.00 0.00 34,200.00 Fixed Profit 289,690.00 0.00 289,690.00 Total Contract,not to exceed S2 519 165 00 $246.6H0.00 a2,765 845 00 �wr� COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS' EI ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 102 ELn9 AVENUE ' Boards of Directors AD eo[9127 November 3, 1994 FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CAUFOANIA 9272EE1".) Page Two 014)962-2411 The Planning, Design and Construction Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. Wohn J.Collins Is/James Wahner John J. Collins James Wahner Chair Vice Chair /s/John D. Linder John D. Linder Director of Engineering RESOLUTION NO. 94-147 APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 4 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS FOR DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES AND PREPARATION OF OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE MANUALS FOR JOB NO. P1-38 AND JOB NO. P2-43 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 4 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS FOR DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES AND PREPARATION OF OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE MANUALS FOR MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-38, AND MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-43, PROVIDING FOR ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore entered into an agreement with John Carollo Engineers for design and construction support services and preparation of operation and maintenance manuals for Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job `...� No. P1-38, and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43; and, WHEREAS, Addendum No. 1 to said agreement provided for revisions to the errors and omissions insurance requirements; and, WHEREAS, Addendum No. 2 to said agreement provided for changes in the scope of work and additional design services to include safety items, landscaping design and odor control enhancements; and, WHEREAS, Addendum No. 3 to said agreement provided for additional engineering services in the scope of work for seismic work as provided in the agreement and to incorporate additional changes; and, WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to further amend said agreement to provide for additional construction support services; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to authorization of the Boards of Directors on November 9, 1994, the Planning, Design and Construction Committee has negotiated and certified a fee for said additional services, in accordance with established procedures for the selection of professional services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Addendum No. 4 dated December 14, 1994, to that certain Professional Services Agreement dated June 12, 1991, by and between County Sanitation District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, S. 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, and John Carollo Engineers for design and construction support services and preparation of operation and maintenance manuals for Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38, and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43, providing for additional construction support services, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the contract provision for fees be increased by an amount not to exceed $246,680.00, as follows, which increases the total authorized compensation from $2,519,165.00 to an amount not to exceed $2,762,845.00: Existin Agreement Addendum Amended As Amended No. 2 Agreement Professional Services, at hourly rates for labor plus overhead at 156%, not to exceed $1,860,159.20 9 0.00 $1,860,159.20 Construction Support Services and Preparation of O&M Manuals, at hourly rates for labor plus overhead at 160%, not to exceed 223,425.80 0.00 223,425.80 Construction Support Services, at hourly rates including labor, overhead at 166% and profit at 9.5%, not to exceed 0.00 246,680.00 246,680.00 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 111,690.00 0.00 111,690.00 Subconsultant Fees, not to exceed 34,200.00 0.00 34,200.00 Fixed Profit 289,690.00 0..00 289,690.00 TOTAL, not to exceed 92.519.165.00 9246.680.00 92.765.845.00 Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on .. behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Addendum No. 3 in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held December 14, 1994. R DL.14] JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING AGENDA FOR DECEMBER 14, 1994 Agenda Item (12)(b)(5): Approval of Change Order No. 6 to the Plans and Specifications for Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. 122-42-2, authorizing an addition of$31,613.00 to the contract with Margate Construction for one item of additional work, increasing the total authorized amount from $14,343,891.00,to an amount not to exceed $14,373,504.00 Summary Job No. P242-2 is a $14.5 million contract to expand the secondary treatment capacity at Plant No. 2 by lengthening the clarifiers and installing other improvements. This project will increase �..� the secondary capacity from 75 million gallons per day (mgd) to 90 mgd. The plans and specifications were prepared by John Carollo Engineers in 1990 and the construction contract was awarded in April 1993 to Margate Construction, Inc. This contract is approximately 70% complete. Item 1, in the amount of $31,613.00,is for modifications to the entryways to Digester Pump Rooms PQ and RS. The modifications added concrete ramps and traffic rated galvanized steel grating to the pump room entryways. These changes were needed to upgrade the roadway and the entrances at the pump rooms to accept heavy vehicle traffic that the Districts' Maintenance Department require to perform their work. This work was scheduled to be performed in a future project, but it was determined to be expedited due to an immediate need by the Districts' Maintenance Department. Districts staff solicited bids from several on site contractors to complete the work. This contractor was the low bidder. If the Directors approve this change order, the total cost of the change orders to date will be a credit of $122,496.00and an additional 239 calendar days. This represents a decrease of 1.00% from the original contract amount. The contract provides for assessment of liquidated damages in the amount of $750.00 per day. Executive Committee Recommendation Approval of Change Order No. 6 for an addition of$31,613.00 to the contract with Margate. Construction, Inc. There is no time extension associated with this change order. wpdocWxe ybdlM Page 1 of 3 .► COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. 0. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Six (6) Date: December 14, 1994 Job: Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-2 Consultant: John Carollo Engineers Amount this Change Order (Add)(Deduct) $ 31,613.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 - DIGESTER PUMP ROOM ACCESS The contractor was directed to modify the existing entryways to Digester Pump Rooms PQ and RS. The modifications included the removal of asphalt ramps and aluminum grating and their replacement with concrete ramps and galvanized steel sections at each of the two pump rooms. These changes were required to provide traffic rated structures for access to the pump rooms to perform maintenance work. This work was scheduled to be completed in a future project but was expedited due to an immediate need for the Districts Maintenance Department to service these areas. If the maintenance was not performed at this time there is a good possibility that system failures could occur which would affect the process of four major digesters. The Districts' staff solicited bids from several on-site contractors to complete the work. This contractor was the successful low bidder. This work was negotiated via competitive bid pursuant to Section 10-6(6)2B of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO #11). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $31,613.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $31,613.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days Page 2 of 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Six (6) Date: December 14, 1994 Job: Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-2 Consultant: John Carollo Engineers The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change Order, and that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: June 2, 1993 Original Contract Time: 730 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: June 1, 1995 Time Extension this C.O.: 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 239 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 969 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: January 26, 1996 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 14,496,000.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ (154,109.001 This Change(Add) (Dedast) $ 31,613.00 Amended Contract Price $ 14,373,504.00 Page 3 of 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Six (6) Dale: December 14.. 1994 Job: Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. 132-42-2 Consultant: John Carollo Engineers Board Authorization Date: December 14, 1994 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Submitted by: m=de . ngi6eering Manager Date onstruction ager Date Apgd by: Approved as to Form: g- 27 rd 9¢ l6 4 -le( Director of Engineering Dale Gene P I Counsel Date Accepted by: MARGATE CONSTRUCTION, INC. Contfactor Date JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING AGENDA FOR DECEMBER 14, 1994 Agenda Item (12)(b)(6): Consideration of Resolution No. 94-148, Approve Reimbursement Agreement with Orange County Water District; Approve Recommendations included in Report on Pre- Qualification of Membrane Diffuser Manufacturers; Approve Plans and Specifications and any Subsequent Addenda; and Consideration of Resolution No. 94-149, Authorize General Manager Set a Bid Date, Receive Bids and Recommend Award of Construction Contract for Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36-2 (tentative bid date is January 10, 1995). Summary In October 1989, the Directors awarded a Professional Services Agreement to John Carollo Engineers (Carollo) for the preparation of plans and specifications for design and construction support services related to the expansion and improvements to the existing secondary treatment facilities at both wastewater treatment plants. The design has resulted in a total of four different construction contracts which expand the secondary treatment facility capacity from 46 million gallons per day (MGD)to 80 MGD at Plant No. 1 and from 75 MGD to 90 MGD at Plant No. 2. This overall design and construction effort includes extensive structural and mechanical modifications to existing facilities, expansion of secondary treatment capacity and design of various miscellaneous support facilities. The design will provide for the removal of sixteen internal combustion engines which cannot be operated because of restrictions of the South Coast Air Quality Management District Permit to Operate. The three Central Power Generation engines at Plant 1 are replacing these engines. Job No P1-36-1, at Plant No. 1, is currently under construction and will make modifications to the Primary Effluent Pump Station that provides primary effluent to the secondary facilities. This work includes the removal of two engines that are to be replaced with electrical motors, replacement of older electrical transformers and the addition of new transformers for the new motors, additional instrumentation and miscellaneous other systems. This work will cost approximately$7.0 Million to complete. Job No. P2-42-1 is the electrification of 12 pump drives (replacement of internal combustion engines with electric motors) located in Headworks B and C, the Plant Water Pump Station and Primary Effluent Pump Station. Job No. P2-42-1 has been completed and accepted by the Board of Directors at a cost of$9.5 Million. Job No. P242-2 is the actual secondary treatment expansion and is currently under construction and is expected to be completed in January 1996, at an estimated cost of$15.0 Million. xydW*=)AEatffie H The design of Job No P1-36-2 is now complete. This design will provide the increase of secondary treatment capacity to 80 MGD at Plant No. 1 by adding more secondary clarifiers and �..J sludge thickeners, replacing engine-driven blowers with motor-driven units, existing air diffusers with higher efficiency units, and rehabilitation of the existing secondary facilities. The following actions by the Boards are necessary to proceed with the project as designed. (1) Reimbursement Agreement with Orange County Water District The Orange County Water District (OCWD) imports secondary treated wastewater from the Districts, which is again treated for use in ground water injection and for various other users supplied by the Green Acres Project. This reclaimed water is used for irrigation and industrial uses. The Districts purchase Green Acres water for use in cooling equipment in the Central Power Generation facilities at both plants and then reuse it again for use in the plant water systems. The existing OCWD pump station, which is located near the existing circular secondary clarifier, has reached the limit of its mechanical life and capacity. In association with OCWD, the Districts have sited the location of the proposed new pump station south of the new rectangular secondary clarifiers. OCWD has provided plans and specifications for the construction of this facility, which will be included in the P1-36-2 construction documents. The pipeline that will convey the secondary treated wastewater to the OCWD facilities was installed under Job No. P1-33. Executive Committee Recommendation �..d Approval of the Reimbursement Agreement for costs associated with the pump station with the Orange County Water District in a form acceptable to General Counsel. (2) Pre-Qualification of Air Diffusion Equipment The design of Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1 includes modifications to the aeration basins where air is introduced into the treatment process to promote aerobic biological treatment of the process stream. The work associated with the aeration basins includes the installation of air diffusers that take compressed air, through a membrane or ceramic disk, and produce a fine-air bubble. This air bubble rises through the wastewater. The microbes living in the wastewater use the oxygen in the air for their metabolism and consume the dissolved organic material in the wastewater, which produces a clean effluent. Al Plant No. 2, pure oxygen is introduced into the process rather than air. The cost involved with providing compressed air for this process is expensive. There are basically three types of diffusers available that produce the bubble size necessary to ensure the highest transfer rate of oxygen to the process. These types include plates (membrane), tubes (membrane), and disks (ceramic). By limiting the suppliers to those that provide the highest efficiency transfer rates available, John Carollo Engineers and Districts' staff agree that the savings of power consumed (to produce compressed air) could be in excess of$3.46 million over the life of the project. yd The Districts have notified all manufacturers of this type of equipment of the intent to wixiweBaeVt IZA -2- reviewed by the Consultant for efficiencies and adherence to the plans and specifications. The most efficient diffusers have the highest initial cost but require fewer blowers. The construction documents describe alternate installations for bidding. Executive Committee Recommendation Approval of the Evaluation of Membrane Diffuser Manufacturers report prepared by John Carollo Engineers and acceptance of Sanitaire, Parkson Wyss and Aercor as the only qualified air diffuser equipment suppliers authorized to supply equipment on this project. (3) Approval of Plans and Specifications and Any Subsequent Addenda. and Authority to Advertise and Receive Bids. and Recommend Award of Construction Contract The plans and specifications are now complete. The AOMD Permit to Construct expires in April 1995 and construction must be underway at that time or a new application will be required, delaying the start of this project. Executive Committee Recommendation Approval of the plans and specifications and any subsequent addenda recommended by the Director of Engineering, and that the General Manager be authorized to advertise and receive bids (tentatively scheduled for January 10, 1995) for the Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P136-2; and that the Boards authorize awarding a construction contract to the low responsive bidder upon recommendation of the General Manager and the Director of Engineering. The engineer's estimate for this work is$42,300,000. The OCWD estimate for the pump station work is $1,000,000. wpaoc�Xx JIW12b6 -3- ti .i W County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Secondary Expansion Project (Pl-3fr2) EVALUATION OF MEMBRANE DIFFUSER MANUFACTURERS ii. DRAFT John Carollo Engineers October 1994 Memorandum EVALUATION OF MEMBRANE DIFFUSER MANUFACTURERS This memorandum presents the prequaliflcation process for tube or disc diffusers to bid the P1-36-2 Project for the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 1. A prequalfflcation questionnaire was sent to 30 manufacturers. 2. Six manufacturers responded to the questionnaire and provided information for consideration in the prequalification process. 3. Manufacturers who did not respond to the questionnaire should not be considered for this project. 4. Three tube/disc diffuser manufacturers of the six respondents demonstrate operating history in the size range of the P1-36-2 project and should be prequalifled for bidding purposes. These manufacturers are: Sanitatre - Disc Parkson Wyss - Tube Aercor - Disc 5. Three manufacturers who responded did not provide adequate information or do not have sufficient experience and should not be prequali6ed for bidding. These manufacturers are: EnvlroQuip -Tube Environmental Dynamics Corporation -Tube Outokumpa Mintec USA, Inc. - Disc 6. The P1-36-2 contract documents should state that only Sanitalre. Parkson and Aercor manufacturers are considered for bidding purposes. No other manufacturers of tube or disc diffuser products will be allowed. DRAIT 10/24/94 1 5:\a 1D\FNgm1WWC 1 BACKGROUND The Districts own and operate Reclamation Plant No. 1 which provides activated sludge secondary treatment for a rated capacity of 46 million gallons per day (mgd). The Secondary Treatment Improvements Project (Job No P1-36-2) will increase the activated sludge treatment capacity to 80 mgd. This additional capacity will be achieved by increasing the aeration rates In the existing ten aeration basins and by adding additional secondary clarifiers. To increase the aeration capacity of the existing aeration basins, a new aeration system will be required. The aeration diffusers are the single most important element of the aeration system. Obtaining reliable diffusers will be essential to the success of the P1-36-2 project. The existing aeration system uses "Wyss" membrane tube diffusers, manufactured by Parkson Corporation. These diffusers were installed In 1985 and provided very satisfactory operational service. In 1990, during the preliminary design, Wyss tube diffusers were selected for the expanded aeration system to match the existing system. The P1-36-2 project has been delayed due to flow conservation and other factors. This has afforded the Districts the opportunity to perform additional reviews of alternative diffuser systems. `�.✓ John Carollo Engineers submitted a report to the Districts in November 1993 which concluded that two other types of diffusers, membrane discs and membrane panels, could be considered for the P 1-36-2 aeration system. Membrane tubes and discs have similar operating efficiency while the panel offers a significantly higher operating efficiency, resulting In energy savings. An economic analysis was performed which concluded that: 1. Tube and disc diffusers have a lower capital cost than panel diffusers. 2. Panel diffusers offer savings In operating costs and may have a lower life cycle cost than tubes or discs. 3. Because of the differences in capital costs,a competitive bid between panels and discs could not be won by panels, resulting In a unequitable bid approach. 4. An evaluated bid approach would allow the Districts to consider life cycle costs. DRAFT 10/24/94 2 5:\]9 M]D\WV W.MC On this basis,John Carollo Engineers recommended the following. 1. The Districts should proceed with a bid procedure identifying tube or disc diffusers as a base bid. An alternate bid price should be obtained for panel diffusers. The Districts can then select the bid option which provides the lowest life cycle cost. 2. Because of the large number of manufacturers for tubes and discs, a prequallllcation procedure should be followed to obtain quality equipment for the base bid. PREAUAUFYING PROCESS John Carollo Engineers started the prequallficatlon process by establishing a set of criteria upon which the diffuser products were to be evaluated. The criteria were selected to establish a standard of quality necessary to meet the unique requirements of the secondary expansion project. Once the criterion was established, a questionnaire was developed to gather the Information necessary to perform an evaluation. A list of 30 known suppliers of membrane diffuser products was assembled. These suppliers were contacted by the Districts and Invited to participate In the prequafification process. A list of the manufacturers contacted Is attached in Exhibit A. A deadline was established, after which responses were considered unresponsive. The Districts received six submittals. No late submittals were received. The respondents were evaluated based on the Information provided in the submittal. both for completeness of the submittal and for the ability to comply with the criterion set In the questionnaire. Prequalllication of these manufacturers means that we believe that the details can be worked out for these manufacturers and that they meet the experience and manufacturing capability requirements necessary to compete for this project. PrequahfimUon does not mean that every technical aspect of their design meets the Intent of our specifications as stated in their submittal package. In each case, some modifications to each manufacturer's piping system or layout may be required. DRAFT 10/24/94 3 &�IDNEVMDa9.1 q SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Prospective diffuser manufacturers were given a two part questionnaire. The first part included general Information about the diffuser design,including physical characteristics and materials of construction. Performance data was requested,including maximum and typical air flow rates and certified test results for oxygen transfer efficiency and pressure requirements. In addition, manufacturers were asked to provide a list of U.S. treatment plants using the proposed diffusers, the year of initial operation, the flow capacity of the facilities, the number of Installed diffusers and references. The second part of the questionnaire required the manufacturers to supply a proposed diffuser layout based on the operating conditions given and the dimensions of the existing aeration basins. A copy of the questionnaire Is attached as Exhibit B. EVALUATION \.W/ Table 1 lists the companies contacted and the status as either a respondent or a non-respondent. The respondents Included the following: Aereor Environmental Dynamics. Inc. IEDI) EnviroQuip Outokumpu Mintec USA, Inc. Parkson Wyss Sanitaire. Twee criterion considered important in the evaluation were the size of the largest U.S. Installation where the proposed diffusers have been in operation,how long the diffusers have been performing and maintenance history that has been developed since the diffusers have been in operation. The size of the facility and the number of diffusers supplied gives us an indication of the manufacturing capabilities of the manufacturer. An 80 mgd facility will require a large number of diffusers and deliveries must meet a tight construction schedule. It is Important that the manufacturer demonstrate their ability to produce a quality product within the required schedule. Referenced installations were also contacted to discover how the products have been performing, DRAFT 10/24/94 4 5:VA910RIMEV=IFf.MSC TABLE I COMPANIES CONTACTED Responded Responded 1. Sanitaire c/o Yes 16. Emery-TraWgaz No Glencch-Mitchell Ozone Co. 2. Willey Weber.Inc. No 17. Envlrex Inc. No 3. Schrelber-Envlrouol No I& Envlro¢uip Yes International Inc. 4. Environmental Yes 19. Ferro Corp.. Flltros No Dynamics. Inc. Plant 5. Elmco No 20. FMC Corp. No 6. Roedlger No 21. Gardiner No Equipment Company Inc. 7. Aercor Engineering Yes 22. Koch Engineering No Resources Corp. Co. 8. Parkson Corp. Yes 23. Komax Systems Inc. No 9. Envmex(c/o No 24. Simon Hydro- No MISCO) Aerobics. Inc. \J 10. Aeration Research No 25. Tetra Technologies No Company Inc. 11. Jet Tech Inc. No 26. Walker Process No Equipment 12. Outokumpu Mmtec Yes 27. Wesco Screen No USA. Inc. Company 13. Aeration Industries No 28. W1Mey Weber. Inc. No Inc. 14. Aeromix Systems No 29. Schreiber Corp. No Inc. 15. ECO Equipment No 30. Semblex. Inc. No PEP Inc. For malting addresses see Exhibit A DRAFT 10/24/94 5 &\ ID\EVNDDFMc how long the diffusers have been in service and maintenance problems or failures which were `...✓ experienced. The information received from the responding manufacturers are tabulated on Table 2. Parkson Wyss - tube diffusers and Sanitalre and Aercor - disc diffusers have been installed in facilities comparable in size to Plant No. 1. EDI Flexaire have no operating history in facilities over 7 mgd. EnvlroQufp has very little operating history and OMU has no U.S.facilities with the proposed diffuser. It is our opinion that EDI Flexaire, EnviroQuip and OMU do not meet the specified level of experience nor have they demonstrated the manufacturing capability in terms of total diffusers supplied to be a reliable source of diffuser products. Ve/ DRAFT 10/24/94 6 5:\3310RIDIEV IFf.N O TABLE 2 o COMPARISON OF AERATION DIFFUSER ALTERNATIVES Largest Number of Largest g Membrane Number of Diffusers Flows Standard h Diffuser Diffuser No. of U.S. Diffusers at Proposed Treated at a Years of Membrane Warranty Certified Manufactur Type Installation Single at U.S. plant U.S. material (Years) SOTE er s Facility Plant 1 (mgd) Experience Test Parkson- Tube 600+ 48,000 31,500 200 15 PVC/HTP 5 No" Wyss Flex- A-Tube Sanitaire 7" Disc I80+ 25,000 67.180 60 6 EPDM I Yes Aercor 9" Disc 16 45,000 39,760 57 3 EPDM I No-. EDI Flexalr Tube 20 6.372 10,120 7.0 2 EPDM-/HT 1-5 Yes p Enviroguip Tube 7 2.616 14,413 14 <1 Polyuretha Yes ne OMU 8-3/8" Disc 0 N/A 36,300 N/A 0 EPDM I No HT?- Homogeneous Thermoplastic PVC - Polyvinyl Chloride EPDM - Ethylene Propylene Diane Monomer (1) Declined to respond 1n detail. •EDI also offers a Urethane membrane. Currently under construction --Results on file EXHUBIT A MAILING LIST Sanitalm c/o Gierlich-Mitchell Outokumpu Mmtec USA. Inc. 2652 San Antonio Drive 109 Inverness Dr. East Walnut Creek. CA 94598 Englewood, CO 80112 Willey Weber, Inc. Aeration Industries Inc. 7350 East Progress Place 4100 Peavey Road Englewood. CO 80111 Chaska, MN 55318 612-448-6789 Schreiber-Envirotrol P. O. Box 762 Aeromix Systems Inc. Corte Madera. CA 94925 2611 North Second Street Minneapolis, MN 55411-1633 Environmental Dynamics 800-879: 3677; 612-521-8519 4509 1-70 Drive S.E. Columbia, MO 65201 ECO Equipment FEP Inc. 8070 Jarry EastAnjoy, Pg Eimco Canada H1J 1H5 669 West Second South 416-836-9490 Salt Lake City, UT 84101-0300 Emery-Trs8lgaz Ozone Co. Roediger 1I501 Goldcoast Drive 3812 Route 8 Cincinnati. OR 45249 Allison Park, PA 15101 513-530-7707 412-487-6010 Envirex Inc. Aercor P. O. Box 1604 76 Webster Street Waukesha,WI 53187 Worcester. MA 01603 508-756-1020 EnviroQuip Inc. P. O. Box 9069 Parkson Corp. Austin, TX 78766 2727 N.W. 62 Street 512-218-3200 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33309 Fero Corp., Filtros Plant Envirex(c/o MISC0) 603 W. Commercial Street 1538 Brookhollow, Suite C East Rochester. NY 14445 Santa Ana, CA 92705 716-586-8770 Aeration Research Company FMC Corp. 5300 Memorial, Suite 520 400 Highpoint Drive Houston, TX 77007 Chalfont, PA 18914 215-822-4300 Jet Tech Inc. P. 0. Box 13306 Gardiner Equipment Company Inc. 1051 Blake 6911 Breen Road B-1 Edwardsville, KS 66113 Houston,TX 77086 913-422-7600 713-999-5193 SAM4WD\F IaMBAW Koch Engineering Co. P. O. Box 8127 Wichita, KS 67208-0127 316-832-5110 Komax Systems Inc. 508 East E Street P. O. Box 1323 Wilmington, CA 90748-1323 310-830-4320 Simon Hydro-Aerobics, Inc. 1615 State Route 131 Milford, OH 45150 513-575-2800 Tetra Technologies Inc. P. O. 73087 Houston, TX 77273 713-364-4314 Walker Process Equipment, Div. of McNish Corp. 840 N. Russell Avenue Aurora, IL 60506 708-892-7921 Wesco Screen Company 14309 Sommermeyer Road Houston, TX 77021 800-231-0419; 713-747-5600 Wiltfley Weber, Inc. 7350 E. Progress Place Engelwood. CO 80111 303-779-1777 Schreiber Corp. 100 Schreiber Drive Trussville,AL 35173 205-655-7466 Samblex, Inc. 1635 W. Walnut Street Springfield. MO 65806-1643 417-866-1035 5:\SGMID\ODIIBMa.MSC F3301111T l .r PREAUALiF1YIN0 OUESTIONNAME Please provide the following information for each diffuser type selected(differentiate for each type of membrane material, number of membrane apertures and aperture pattern). Diffuser manufacturers should only submit Information for diffusers that have had a successful operating history of at least five years, in a municipal wastewater application, for a treated flow of at least 30 mgd. Physical Description: 1. Diffuser Type (tube or disc) 2. Diffuser dimensions 3. Membrane material 4. Number of apertures per diffuser 5. Aperture pattern 6. Active surface area per diffuser 7. Materials of construction (other than membrane) Performance: 8. Performance data and/or curves showing the variation of SOTE-cw with: submergence air rate per diffuser floor coverage (define what you mean by floor coverage) 9. Air flow rates: ma)dmum and typical 10. Performance curve showing diffuser headloss versus air flow rate Verification: It. A copy of a certified clean water efficiency test report on the proposed type of diffuser, conducted In accordance with standard ASCE procedures. The results from this test should include a description of the test site and operating conditions, the configuration and density of the diffusers, the depth of submergence, and other Information specified in the ASCE Standard Testing Procedure Manual. Nate: The project specifications will require a witnessed clean water test on the diffuser system to demonstrate that the system exceeds the transfer efficiency claimed. The test report should clearly state the certified SOTS. 12, A list of U.S. treatment plants that currently have your diffuser In use, the date the diffusers were Installed, the number of diffusers installed, and the quantity of treated daily flow. Provide name and telephone number contact at each reference Installation. SA MIMMIaMMM9 f' Y Warranty and Matntengnee: 13. Warranty Information 14. Maintenance information, Including required cleaning and replacement frequency or other recommended procedures. U 8:1SWMID\Etl11BMB.MBC T PR��DALIFYING DRAWINGS CSDOC's Plant 1 contains ten concrete covered aeration basins, each with dimensions 275%x 45V x 15'SWD. Each aeration basin consists of six zones measuring approximately 45 feet by 45 feet each. The first three zones shall be provided with redwood baffle wells. The sbdh zone has exlsting stiffener walls at the effluent end which shall be taken into account in the diffuser layout. Attached find suggested layouts for panel, tube, and disk diffusers. As a pre-qualifying requirement. please submit drawings showing a layout of your diffusers that would: 1) Meet the load requirements per cell (see below for details) 2) Maintain at least 2.0 feet clearance in maintenance aisleways 3) Have a maximum 3.0 feet distance to any diffuser from maintenance alsleways 4) Allow the operation of the diffusers: a. Within normal air flux rates per diffuser, and b. At a minimum clean water oxygen transfer efficiency of 24.4 percent. The drawings should be accompanied by a description of the air flux rates per diffuser, total air requirements,headlosses from the outlet point to the main header dropleg,diffuser elevations and any other pertinent Information. List and detail all deviations from the Specification requirements. Provide drawings of alternative layouts. Clearly indicate the number of drop legs required and provide detailed drawings of the pipe supports. Load Requirements The membrane aeration diffuser system shall have a minimum clean water transfer efficiency of 24.4 percent and deliver 4950 pounds per day of oxygen in the first four zones and 1650 pounds per day in the fifth and sixth zones. the 24.4 percent efficiency Is a minimum requirement,higher efficiencies will result in greater electrical cost savings and thus lower life cycle costs. The Districts are Interested in obtaining maximum floor coverage, maximum efficiency. while maintaining the required aisleways. The speclfled clean water transfer efficiencies shall be at standard temperature(20°C)and pressure(I atmosphere). Other variables that must be used are: Alpha Factor, all cells 0.29 Theta Factor 1.024 Wastewater Temp 27 deg C Atmospheric Air Temp 32 deg C Beta Factor 0.99 Barometric Pressure at site 20.0 inch Hg Side Water Depth (to basin floor) 15 feet Equilibrium oxygen concentration at 20°C& I aim operating submergence Estimate at 9.07 x(I + 0.37 x Submergence/33.96 Preferred D.O. Concentration 2.0 mg/L minimum High & Peak Conditions 1.5 mg/L minimum s:wswuo�srwia�ee.asc RESOLUTION NO. 94-149 `.� APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR JOB NO. P1-36-2 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SECONDARY TREATMENT IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-36-2 .................................. WHEREAS, John Carollo Engineers, Districts' engineers, have completed preparation of the plans and specifications for Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36-2. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the proposed project for Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36-2, is hereby approved. Said project was included in the Program Environmental Impact Report on the 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan approved on July 19, 1989. A Notice of Determination was fled by the Secretary on July 20, 1989, in accordance with the Distrcts' Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended; and, Section 2. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by John Carollo Engineers, Districts' engineers, for Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36-2, are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 3. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Public Contracts Code of the State of California; and, Section 4. That the General Manager be authorized to establish the date and time at ... which said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 5. That the Secretary and the Districts' Director of Engineering or his designee be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held December 14, 1994. RCPJ.149 RESOLUTION NO. 94-148 APPROVING REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WITH ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT RE JOB NO. P1-36-2 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WITH ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT TO INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION OF A PUMP STATION RELATIVE TO GREEN ACRES PROJECT IN CONNECTION WITH SECONDARY TREATMENT IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-36-2 .......................«......... WHEREAS, the Orange County Water District(OCWD) is expanding its wastewater reclamation operation adjacent to Plant No. 1 for their Green Acres project and desire to construct a pump station to transport secondary treated wastewater from County Sanitation Districts' Reclamation Plant No. 1 to OCWD's Green Acres project; and, WHEREAS, County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange �.d County, California are proposing to construct Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P11-36-2, at the same location; and, WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of both parties to incorporate the OCWD project into the Sanitation Districts' project to minimize costs and construction impacts at said site. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Agreement dated December 14, 1994, by and between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County and the Orange County Water District, providing that OCWD's project to construct a pump station to transport secondary treated wastewater from County Sanitation Districts' Reclamation Plant No. 1 to OCWD's Green Acres project be included in the Sanitation Districts' project to construct Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36-2, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the Orange County Water District shall reimburse the Sanitation Districts for OCWUs share of the costs for said work, pursuant to the terms and conditions of said agreement; and, Section 3: That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held December 14, 1994. R Gt00.1G8 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING �.r AGENDA FOR DECEMBER 14, 1994 Agenda Item (12)(b)(7): Consideration authorizing staff to negotiate Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Black &Veatch re Chemical and Wastehauler Facility Modifications at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-46, and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-55. Summary In April 1993, the Boards approved a Professional Services Agreement with Black&Veatch of Irvine, California to prepare design reports, plans, specifications, and supply limited construction services for the chemical wastehauler and plant water modifications. This project Includes replacement of our chlorine odor control and disinfection facilities with hydrogen peroxide and bleach, improvements to our wastehauler dump facilities (already accomplished under separate contract), and improvements to our plant water system to route secondary effluent to the Plant Water Pump Station at Plant No. 2. One Addendum has been previously authorized for this contract for redesign to allow more efficient use of bleach at Plant No. 2. Addendum No. 1 added $11,100.00 to the contract. The total amended contract amount is $390,815.00. The Scope of Work has expanded and the project has been delayed; resulting in added costs. The original Scope of Work required that the consultant design replacement chemical storage and feed facilities to allow the chlorine facilities to be removed. In total, there were four separate chlorinating facilities at the Districts' two wastewater treatment plants. However, the preparation of the project report and on-going Districts' pilot study indicated that the chemical addition should be more site specific in order to save costs and to provide more effective odor control capabilities. Consequently, there will be ten separate chemical storage and feed facilities four at Reclamation Plant No. 1 and six at Treatment Plant No. 2. Each of these is unique and requires separate design. This change in chemical sites increased coordination requirements with the Districts' staff, including the Operations, Maintenance, Engineering departments. Finally, the project itself has been delayed because of the expansion of the scope. Staff believes that addendum to the existing contract is warranted. Executive Committee Recommendation Authorize staff to negotiate Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Black &Veatch, providing for additional design services, at an estimated cost of$280,000.00, for consideration by the Boards at a future meeting. wpdxkwecvlbd120 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING AGENDAFOR DECEMBER 14, 1994 Agenda Item (12)(b)(8) Consideration of Resolution No. 94-150, Amending Classification and Compensation Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, Establishing a Conferral of Leave Policy Summary: Gary Hasenstab, Director of Personnel, reviewed the Districts' conferral of leave policy which was deferred last month pending a review of all leave policies. Four Districts' employees are confronting or experiencing catastrophic medical conditions involving either themselves or their children that will result in a depletion of all of their accrued paid leave. Several of their co-workers have expressed an interest in giving a portion of their own accrued paid leave to these individuals to at least partially offset their loss of pay, as well as to offer them support through their difficult experiences. There is at present no Districts' policy that would allow for the buy-back or donation of paid leave, including vacation, personal leave or compensatory time off, to another employee who is without paid leave as a direct result of a catastrophic medical situation. For that reason, staff recommends adoption of a conferral of leave policy. A complete policy statement is attached. The policy provides that employees may, on a one- time basis, elect to donate accrued and unused personal leave, vacation leave or compensatory time off to an individual employee who has depleted his or her own paid leave as a direct result of a catastrophic medical condition. All such time must be conferred on a form provided by the Director of Personnel. Executive Committee Recommendation Approval of a resolution to amend Classification and Compensation Resolution No. 79.20, as amended, to establish a conferral of leave policy �j°� Mx!a6gmb mjtbd12b8 September 19, 1994 DISTRICTS' POLICY REGARDING CONFERRAL OF LEAVE Eligibility. Employees may on occasion face catastrophic medical conditions involving either themselves or their immediate family that result in their exhausting all of their accrued sick, vacation, personal or other paid leave. Such employees may request, or be nominated for, conferral of certain forms of paid leave by other employees. To be eligible to participate in the Conferral of Leave program, an employee must have exhausted all of their paid leave, including vacation, sick, personal and compensatory time off (CTO) . They may also be requested to provide medical documentation of a serious health condition involving their child, parent or spouse, or involving the employee's own serious health condition. Donation Procedure. Upon receipt of a request or nomination for conferral of paid leave, the Director of Personnel shall request approval by the Districts' Boards to implement the provisions of the Conferral of Leave Policy. Upon such approval, all employees shall be notified of the program. All donations shall be voluntary on a form provided by the Director of Personnel . Employees may donate vacation, compensatory or personal leave time to the eligible employee; sick leave may not be donated. Donations must be made in whole hour increments, and are irrevocable. Conferral of Paid Time. The vacation, compensatory or personal leave time that is donated by each employee shall be converted to a dollar value based on the hourly rate of the donor. Those dollars shall then be converted into sick leave at the hourly rate of the recipient of the donation, and added to their account. Any such hours that remain at the conclusion of the leave period shall remain available for the use of the recipient and shall be treated as regularly accrued sick or personal leave. JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING AGENDA FOR DECEMBER 14, 1994 Agenda Item (12)(b)(9): Approving request of KPMG Peat Marwick for an increase in fees for the 1993-94 financial audit from $46,800 plus out-of-pocket costs to $63,861 plus out-of-pocket costs. Summary: KPMG Peat Marwick has provided independent professional audit services to the Districts since 1975. In February, the Fiscal Policy Committee directed staff to obtain a proposal for KPMG to extend their services through the 1993-94 audit. At the May Joint Board meeting, KPMG was retained for an amount not to exceed $46,800 plus expenses for 1,095 hours. The prior years audit fees for 1,192 hours were $43,750 plus expenses. KPMG has submitted an invoice for the 1993-94 audit for 1,834 hours or$76,241 plus expenses. They have asked the Districts to pay a total of$63,861 for their fees, an increase in the authorized amount of$17,061. KPMG and staff agree that the hours overrun is attributable to the change to a CAFR format subsequent to KPMG's proposal, audit adjustments required to report in accordance with GAAP, and a complete change in audit staff. The hours billed to the Districts can be summarized as: Hours COP Refunding &Other Entries 76 Equity and Fund Balance Adjustments 27 Accounts Receivable Issues 57 Fixed Assets&Capitalized Interest 48 CAFR Format Change &Additional Review 115 Other Adjustments 6 Total 329 Should the Directors decide to grant the entire adjustment requested, the Districts will have paid for 329 of the 739 hours incurred in excess of the proposal, or 45% of the excess. The KPMG average rate for the 1,424 hours would then be $44.85 per hour, or 34% of their standard billing rate. Executive Committee Recommendation Approving request of KPMG Peat Marwick for an increase in fees for the 1993-94 financial audit from $46,800 plus out-of-pocket costs to $63,861 plus out-of-pocket cost. wpd.Vm\exec4bd12b9 M JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR AGENDA AGENDA FOR DECEMBER 14, 1994 Agenda Item (12)(b)(1 O): Consideration of Resolution No. 94-151, Amending Classification and Compensation Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, relative to staffing changes in Plant Operations Summary: Bob Doter, Assistant Director of Operations, reviewed the attached staff report with the Finance and Personnel Committee. During the 1994-95 budget process, the Fiscal Policy Committee approved several personnel changes recommended by staff. The changes were held in abeyance by the Executive Committee �..d pending organization and management studies by Ernst & Young. The attached staff report details those previously approved requests which are now needed to improve the productivity of the Operations Department and to properly classify the work that is being done. The proposal is for a net decrease of two authorized positions and an annual salary savings of$56,136 at the top of the ranges. Executive Committee Recommendation Approve Resolution No. 94-151, amending Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, for a net decrease of two positions and a maximum annual salary budget reduction of$56,136 in Plant Operations. \� wpdWgmlem4bd12b10 _ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS Y d ORANGE COUNTY. CAUFORNIA November 9, 1994 1O9EAE"AAWE Vo BOX 0127 N WAJN VALL 1.MOONMA 92) 9127 STAFF REPORT 0141ee2 411 OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT STAFFING Background/Discussion During the 1994-95 budget process, staff recommended several personnel and organizational changes in the Director of Operations and Maintenance Technical Support Group and the Operations Division to address staffing needs, programmatic revisions, and budgetary constraints. All of the personnel changes forwarded to and approved by the Fiscal Policy Committee were placed on hold by the Executive Committee pending the results of the Ernst & Young study. The proposed personnel changes are not within the scope of the Ernst & Young studies. The Technical Support Group and Operations Division are responsible for regulatory compliance, contingency planning, operational research, testing, chemical and utility evaluations, report preparation and plant optimization and day to day operations. The staffing changes proposed by the Operations Department arise from the need to meet the changing operational demands and regulatory requirements associated with the day-to-day operations of the Joint Works Treatment Facilities. Some of the duties and ENE,/ responsibilities of the Technical Support Group within the Director's Office and the Plant Operations Division are proposed to be realigned to better meet these demands and challenges. The proposed changes within the Director's Office consist of adding one Environmental Specialist II position and one Environmental Specialist I position. A new Environmental Specialist II ($3,125 - 3,891) is proposed to more properly reflect the scientific data gathering, analyzing, organizing and presenting duties and the knowledge of compliance requirements, chemical terminology and significant statistical methods of an incumbent Engineering Aide II ($2,651 - 3,301) whose current position will be deleted. An Environmental Specialist 1 ($2,669 - 3,324) position is proposed to assist the Operations project engineers and managers, to provide the proper level of staffing for current workloads and to meet regulatory deadlines. The person performing these functions is currently classified as an Operator-in-Training ($2,223 - 2,768) in the Plant Operations Division, and that position is proposed to be deleted. Several personnel changes are also being proposed for the Plant Operations Division. The 124 authorized positions in the Plant Operations Division are responsible for operating the sewage treatment and disposal processes at both plants to process and dispose of treated wastewater and separated solids to meet regulatory permit criteria, for personnel training and safety, and for meeting the Districts' NPDES ocean e Staff Report November 9, 1994 �...� Page Two discharge permit requirements. These responsibilities require staffing to monitor and operate the plants and collection system pump station 24 hours per day, seven days per week. Approximately 75% of the time this is the only Division with staff on site. The Central Power Generation Facilities for both plants came on-line during the last fiscal year. These generating facilities provide electrical power to run the plants. By changing the Operations' shift schedule to include a 12-hour shift, the Operations Division has been able to more efficiently allocate its staffing resulting in no additional position requests even with the added responsibilities. Because of the increased technical responsibilities associated with operating two major power generating plants, an Engineer 1$4,495 - 6,360) position is proposed. The Engineer will be responsible for power plant efficiency and operational studies, regulatory compliance and power plant troubleshooting, and will assist in the supervision of the power plants. One Operations Supervisors ($4,080 - 5,755) position is proposed to be deleted for the new Engineer's classification. A Foreman ($3,355 - 4,745) position is proposed to be deleted in favor of an additional Pump Power Operator ($3,110 - 3,872) required to provide continuous staffing and �.►� supervision backup. Because of staffing productivity (12-hour shift), reduced turnover and operational modifications in the Operations Division, the deletion of the remaining three Operator- in-Training ($2,223 - 2,768) positions is proposed. One of these positions is currently encumbered by a proposed Environmental Specialist position in the Director's Office. Table 1 summarizes the proposed personnel changes previously described. Recommendation In order to provide improved technical and operational support for the Operations Department, to better meet regulatory requirements, and to reflect the actual work being performed, the following personnel changes are recommended to implement the previously described programs. Division 3310 - Directors Office Add one Environmental Specialist II, add one Environmental Specialist I position and delete one Engineering Aide 11 position. Staff Report November 9, 1994 Page Three Class Number Class Title Authorization Range Monthly Salary 4425 Environmental 1 1063G $3,125-3,891 Specialist II 4427 Environmental 1 1061 $2,669-3,324 Specialist 1 3135 Engineering <1 > 1060G $2,651-3,301 Aide II Division 3380 - Plant Operations Add one Engineer position and one Pump Power Operator position. Class Number Class Title Authorization Range Monthly Salary ..✓ 3114 Engineer 1 $4,495-6,360 5125 Pump Power 1 2061D $3,110-3,872 Operator Delete one Operations Supervisor position, one Foreman position and three Operator-in- Training positions. Class Number Class Title Authorization Range Monthly Salary 5110 Operations < 1 > $4,080-5,775 Supervisor 5214 Foreman < 1 > $3,355-4,745 5119 Operator-in- <3> 2055C $2,223-2,768 Training Based on the top of the existing salary ranges, the above changes would reduce the salaries budget by $4,678 monthly and would result in a net decrease in authorized staff of two positions. ATTACHMENT Table 1 Proposed Personnel Changes 1994-95 Classification/Division 1993-94 Authorization Add Delete Proposed Authorization Division 3310 Directors Office Environmental Specialist II 1 1 Environmental Specialist 1 1 1 Engineering Aide II 1 < 1 > Division 3380 Plant Operations Engineer 1 1 Operations Supervisor 15 < 1 > 14 Foreman 1 < 1 > Pump Power Operator 11 1 12 Operator-in-Training 3 <3> Total 4 <6> JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING AGENDA FOR DECEMBER 14, 1994 Agenda Item (12)(b)(11 ): Consideration to approve Resolution No. 94-152, expressing appreciation to Charles Egigian Nichols Summary During the Executive Committee meeting of November 30, 1994, staff reported that Charles Egigian-Nichols, Manager of the Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse had recently left the Districts to take a position with a biosolids reuse contractor. After a brief discussion of his accomplishments on behalf of the Districts, the Executive Committee recommend that a Resolution of Appreciation be adopted by the Joint Boards. Executive Committee Recommendation Recommend to the Joint Boards to consider Resolution No. 94-152, commending Charles Egigian Nichols upon his resignation from the Districts. 4./ wpd-e-NW1201 RESOLUTION NO. 94-152 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, COMMENDING CHARLES EGIGIAN NICHOLS FOR HIS OUTSTANDING CONTRIBUTIONS AND DEDICATION TO PUBLIC SERVICE UPON HIS RESIGNATION AS AN EMPLOYEE OF THE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY .................................. WHEREAS, CHARLES EGIGIAN NICHOLS has announced his resignation after more than five years of service as Manager of the Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Division of the County Sanitation Districts; and, WHEREAS, CHARLES EGIGIAN NICHOLS has served as a loyal and dedicated employee from July 1989 to November 1994; and, WHEREAS, during that employment with the County Sanitation Districts, CHARLES EGIGIAN NICHOLS: Has, as Manager of the Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Division, been responsible for management of the biosolids beneficial use programs, water recycling programs, water conservation programs and legislative/regulatory advocacy programs for the Districts with an annual budget of$6.5 million; and, Has made a significant contribution to the efficient operation of the County Sanitation Districts; and, Has exhibited an active interest in the welfare and training of the employees of the County Sanitation Districts; and, Has devoted many hours and much energy to the wastewater management program of the County Sanitation Districts; and, Has been a fair and pleasant person with whom to work and a good fiend of all the people working with the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County; and, WHEREAS, the County Sanitation Districts achieved 100% beneficial reuse of its biosolids, thereby saving valuable landfill capacity and converting a disposal problem into a resource opportunity during his tenure as Manager of the Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Division. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That the Directors and staff of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County do express to CHARLES EGIGIAN NICHOLS their sincere appreciation for the generous and meritorious service and conscientious effort expended on behalf of said County Sanitation Districts and their program of environmental protection and public service in Orange County. PASSED AND ADOPTED by unanimous acclamation at a regular meeting of said Boards on the 14th day of December, 1994. BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA U Joint Chair General Manager Board Secretary .plc 152 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING AGENDAFOR DECEMBER 14, 1994 Agenda Item (1 2)(c)(1 ): Actions re Purchase of two DEC 2100-600 AXP Computers Summary In June 1991, the Joint Boards approved the purchase of a VAX VMS duster hardware platform for the support of the Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS) and the Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS) in accordance with the Minicomputer Hardware System and Network Master Plan. After three years of successful use and rapid growth, these two systems have exceeded the designed capacity of the platform. Staff evaluated three options for providing additional capacity and the results are included in the attached Staff Report. �..✓ Executive Committee Recommendation Authorize staff to issue a purchase order to AVNET Computer, in the amount of$150,374.00, plus sales tax, for Purchase of Two DEC 2100-600 AXP Computers (Specification No. E-252). wpd=%sxwc ttx12c1 s COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS y 01 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 'rem E".V ..E October 27, 1994 Po.WX8+27 MWAIMva ..MMWAenz 121 STAFF REPORT mnsexx++ CRITICAL NEED FOR LIMS/CMMS CAPACITY UPGRADE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Joint Boards approved the purchase of a VAX VMS cluster from Digital Equipment Corporation in June 1991 in accordance with the Minicomputer Hardware System and Network Master Plan. This cluster was for the support of the Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS) and the Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS). Following three years of successful use and rapid growth, these two systems have exceeded the designed capacity of the VAX VMS cluster hardware platform. Staff evaluated 3 options for providing additional capacity considering key characteristics such as price performance, system availability, hardware compatibility, and long and short term return on investment. In the final analysis, the processing required by the software written by the LIMS software vendor progressed to the point where it controlled the option. The only solution which would meet the LIMS processing needs was also the one which best met the other criteria studied. Staff recommends purchase of two AXP 2100 processors to replace the original cluster at a total cost not-to-exceed of $150,374 plus tax. Staff �..d further recommends the most cost efficient use for the existing VAX cluster hardware is to retain the hardware for future needs of Plant Automation at Plant No. 2 by upgrading it to the appropriate model for the CRISP/32 software. This method would be less expensive than purchasing the VAX new for Plant No. 2 plant automation needs. BACKGROUND: The Environmental Sciences Laboratory provides important support of the operation of our wastewater treatment plant and our efforts to protect the environment. The LIMS is essential to enable the Laboratory to efficiently and accurately collect, catalog, manage and report data regarding samples, test analyses, and laboratory processes. Recommendations were presented to the Joint Boards in June 1991 which explained the need for a LIMS, the vendor solutions which were available, the selection process utilized, and the staff recommendation for the selected vendor from which to purchase a LIMS system. The staff proposal was part of a Master Plan presented to the Joint Boards with a 3 to 5 year time frame and recommended, as the first phase in implementing the plan, a dual-host VAX cluster consisting of two VAX 4300 computers to provide a platform for the requested LIMS and a (then) soon-to-be- recommended CMMS. The purchase authority given was in accordance with an 1 r Executive Committee recommendation for an amount not to exceed $547,323.84 plus tax. Approximately 50% of this amount was attributable to the hardware which will be replaced in the proposal at the conclusion of this report. The remaining portion of the original purchase price was for disk storage, software licenses, monitors, printers, other various peripherals as well as installation, maintenance and consulting. The staff report regarding the LIMS provided a cost/benefit analysis with data contrasting manual samples handling with automated samples handling. A payback of 3.2 years was based on a static load, showing a fixed number of samples processed per a fixed period of time, contrasting manual versus automated methods. No projections were made to allow for growth of the number of samples needing to be processed in the same time frame. No detailed quantification was made then of predicted capacity needs for Laboratory samples handling and increased data processing. At the time this report was prepared, only rough estimates were possible because the Laboratory was evolving so rapidly and the end-point of the changes was unknown. Our analysis showed comparisons of various LIMS vendor solutions, contrasting feature strengths and weaknesses and differences in pricing and licensing. The selection of the VAX configuration from Digital Equipment Corporation was supported by eight factors: 1. Compatibility. The LIMS would be able to be serviced more easily and could ultimately communicate with existing systems at the Districts such as the Ocean Outfall Booster Station. 2. Compliance with accepted industry standards such as IEEE 802.3 (the International standard for Ethernet) for networking, OSI (an international standard for system compatibility), and other relevant standards (POSIX for UNIX standardization, DDIF for document interfacing, etc.) 3. Multivendor network application support. Hardware and software products from a multitude of different vendors are supported. 4. Compound document architecture within the multivendor network support infrastructure mentioned above. (This means that a single document can be linked to several other software applications on a variety of hardware platforms.) 5. Automatic Backup. Clustering of Central Processing Units (CPU) would provide automatic fail-over capability to keep the system in service. 6. Flexibility. Applications can be centralized or distributed, as required. 2 7. Scalability. Future expansion could be performed "in the box" with system �.,.i board installations and additional memory chips. (Although this form of expandibility has not been fully exploited for the LIMS system's computer hardware, rapid changes in pricing and technology have made this option less cost effective at this juncture.) 8. Software availability. Over 8,500 commercially-available applications available from third-party vendors allowed the broadest range of selection for solutions for the Districts future needs. The selection of a platform from Digital Equipment Corporation was also supported by Volume 5 of the 2020 Vision Master Plan (Computer Control, Monitoring and Data Handling Systems). The particular model and configuration recommended was the lowest cost, upgradeable, clusterable system. The LIMS application was only available to run on the DEC VAX platform at the time the LIMS was purchased. Today, however, this application can now run on two other vendor platforms; IBM and Hewlett-Packard (HP). However, the comparable models from these two vendors are much higher in price (in excess of $300,000 versus $150,325) and do not meet all of the eight original criteria first used in 1991. The original intent was that the system, regardless of the manufacturer of the computer hardware, would eventually need to be upgraded in some fashion as the Districts' data needs grew and more experience was realized with both the LIMS and CMMS application packages. The attractiveness of scalability (item 7 in the criteria above) influenced the decision for the particular model chosen. The next available size model seemed excessive in terms of both price ($115,000 each versus $150,000 each) and capacity (80 TPS versus 125 TPS') based on the best estimates available. CURRENT SITUATION: The utilization of the VAX cluster has recently exceeded its designed capacity in terms of memory and CPU (Central Processing Unit) throughput2. The original design of the system projected a 3 to 5 year time frame before the need for some type of 'TPS, or Transactions Per Second, is a unit of measurement of effective processing based on a standard computer data processing transaction. 'Throughput is a computer's overall performance as measured by its capability to send data through all components of the system, including secondary storage devices, such as disk drives. Throughput is a much more meaningful indication of system performance than some of the benchmark times commonly reported in computer advertising, which involve the execution of computation-intensive algorithms. 3 4 system expansion. The fact that the shorter projection of 3 years was realized rather than the 5 year projection was due to many factors: 1. The number of personal computer connections to the VAX network has more than tripled since 1991 due to increased Laboratory staffing changes and differences in how the LIMS is being utilized. An example of one of these differences is the use of the LIMS as a network server rather instead of a host configuration (this change has come as a result of enhancements made by the LIMS software vendor). This results in changes in how the input and output traffic is handled. 2. The number of samples processed by the Laboratory has increased. One of the reasons for the increase in the number of samples is that work which was previously contracted out to other Laboratories is now being done here at the Districts at our own Laboratory at lower costs. These include samples from our plant processes as well as Source Control. 3. More dramatic increases have occurred in the number of constituents which are required to be tested 0 50% to 200% increase). These are due to changes in regulations from the EPA, other regulations (such as implementation of the Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (EMAP)), increases in the number of industrial permitees, and other factors. 4. The number of automated Laboratory instruments has increased and existing instruments have been modified to enable automatic data collection in compliance with ISO 9000 standards (a new international standard providing certification for data management) and Laboratory certification standards. This has increased the number of data points required for the LIMS to monitor from the 45,000 it was designed for to well over 100,000. 5. The staff of the Maintenance Department has reported that, due to increased efficiencies and the elimination of bottlenecks, they are nearly 3 years ahead of schedule in the implementation of their CMMS. Data collection and data entry has moved more smoothly and quickly than expected. 6. New applications such as Office Automation applications for word processing, spreadsheets, and graphics have been added to the system which were not originally foreseen. No single application has added appreciably to the total system load but in the aggregate, some impact has been seen. As a result of these factors, optimum storage memory and throughput capacity have been exceeded and serious performance degradation has already been experienced by both the Maintenance Department and the Laboratory. This is evidenced by 4 slower performance, unacceptable waiting time for system response and, on a few �..✓ occasions, the inability for users to be able to log on to the system for an extended period of time (as much as several hours, in some cases). The LIMS is not a single software package but a collection of computer programs that work together. One of the key LIMS elements was a program called Multichrom. This program is used to collect data from automated Laboratory instruments, especially those used for chromatography. As mentioned earlier, the number of constituents which the Districts must test for in the Laboratory has increased dramatically. This, in turn, has required the Districts to acquire and use more sophisticated Laboratory instrumentation. The LIMS vendor, responding to the needs of all of its customers, has had to re-write the Multichrom software to satisfy the more rigorous data processing needs made necessary by the newer Laboratory insturmentation. The new program which is now named XChrom, requires more processing power than is possible by the VAX computer. In an announcement made October 25, 1994, the LIMS vendor, Fisons, stated that existing VAX customers must migrate to the AXP platform to be able to use XChrom. ALTERNATIVES: lipgrarle Ciumm VAX Chistpr: This will require upgrading the current cluster of two VAX 4000-300 computers to the VAX 4000-700. This was the alternative envisioned at the original 1991 purchase. This will provide the Laboratory and Maintenance with most of the capacity they will need until fiscal 1996-97, at which time another upgrade will probably be necessary. However, this upgrade will not enable the Laboratory to use XChrom for the collection of Laboratory instrumentation data. The cost for this choice will be $225,000. See attachments A and B. M'nrate frnm C urrnt VAX Cluster in AXP f'histnr: This alternative will migrate the LIMS and CMMS onto the new DEC 2100-600 AXP computers. The capacity potential should provide for the Districts' needs for LIMS and CMMS well into the next decade. It will also provide the Districts with a hardware platform with the latest technology. (The AXP computer platform is based on the Alpha chip which is currently the fastest computer chip in the world.) It will also provide the Districts with a hardware platform which will allow us to use XChrom to collect and process Laboratory Instrumentation data. The cost of this upgrade will be $150,374.00 plus tax. M'nratp frnm r'urrent VAX Cluster to IBM HP or some. othpr vendnr 5 This alternative is estimated to cost a minimum of $300,000+ for this fiscal year with unknown costs for next year. The current investment in peripheral devices for disk and tape storage as well as other peripherals could not be carried over to a new vendor's system and would also require replacement. In addition, all in-house staff would require new training for a new platform. Differences in networking requirements will require extensive third-party consulting and engineering work. Significant differences would also need to be worked out with existing LIMS and CMMS vendors as far as their compatibility with the selected hardware vendor is concerned. At this point in time, the LIMS vendor, Fisons, has not found another hardware platform from another manufacturer which possesses enough processing power to run XChrom. (The AXP is the only one that has the processing power required.) Provided that these challenges can be overcome, this alternative could provide the Districts' capacity needs for LIMS and CMMS at least until the end of the decade. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends migration from the existing VAX Cluster to the DEC 2100-600 AXP computers as the most cost-effective alternative to meet the Districts' needs for increased computing capacity for the LIMS and CMMS system. Staff recommends purchase of two DEC 2100-AXP computers from AVNET Computer of Tustin, CA for a total cost not to exceed $150,374.00 plus tax. This price includes all set-up, after- hours installation, software license transfers and any other costs. 6 Attak d A COMPARISON OF CAPACITY vs DEMAND 600 _ 500 N a t 9 C ou 400 W y L o. _ c 300 — AXP ' ' 'IBM&HP m N — Upgraded VAX Existing VAX u n A Projected Demand U 100 0 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 97.98 98-99 99-00 Year Dollars _ N N o g 0 0 v 1 14 3 � w N O m v y JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS MEETING AGENDA FOR DECEMBER 14, 1994 Agenda Item (13): Consideration of actions re CEQA requirements relative to Draft Supplement No. 3 to Program Environmental Impact Report for the 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan, re Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades, Job No. J-34-1 Summary For background information on said project, see the attached Staff Report dated November 9, 1994, and Draft Supplement No. 3 to said Program Environmental Impact Report, previously given included in the Directors packages for the November 1994 V.✓ Joint Boards meeting. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends actions relative to public hearing on subject project; consideration of motion to receive and file written comments relative to Draft Supplement No. 3 to said EIR, if any; receive public oral comments, if any; close public hearing; consideration of motion directing staff and the consultant, K. P. Lindstrom, Inc., to address any written and oral comments received on Draft Supplement No. 3 after the close of public comment period on December 31, 1994, and to prepare Final Supplement No. 3 to said Program EIR for future consideration by the Boards. Agemla Item -1- en9Yn9npis'ai12-94.01 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA November 9, 1994 1OB60 ALL16 AW" >O.WX 8127 FWWAINVAu Y.CALW wuWIMOIRI 0lnsazxll STAFF SUMMARY SUPPLEMENT NO. 3 TO 1989 PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT RE RECONSTRUCTION OF SURGE TOWER NO. 1, PART OF OCEAN OUTFALL RELIABILITY UPGRADES, JOB NO. J-34-1 BACKGROUND In 1989, the Districts adopted a comprehensive plan entitled, "Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan", which identified facility needs for a 30-year planning period. From time-to-time, as projects are identified which were not included in, or differ from, the 1989 Master Plan and its Program Environmental Impact Report, supplements to the Program EIR are prepared. Because a Program EIR was certified in 1989, a supplement to the program EIR can concentrate on the project and does not have to revisit the wastewater treatment program. \,.i Draft Supplement No. 3 to the 1989 Program EIR has been prepared to deal with a change in a project. This report reviews the need for Supplement No. 3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION For the past several years, the Districts have taken several steps to improve effluent disposal reliability, including the replacement of portions of the Districts' 1954 78-inch standby outfall with 120-inch outfall pipe, concurrent with the rebuilding of Pacific Coast Highway over the Santa Ana River and construction of the Huntington Beach Wetlands Conservancy Marsh, south of Treatment Plant No. 2. The subject of this staff report is the relocation and heightening of Surge Tower No. 1 within Treatment Plant No. 2. This project includes the reconstruction of Surge Tower No. 1, the shorter of the two surge towers on the outfall disposal system. The planned work is in keeping with 1989 Master Plan of Collection, Disposal and Treatment Facilities and with two subsequent reliability studies performed to improve disposal reliability and provide seismic upgrades. The latter two separate studies have resulted in a recommendation to reconstruct Surge Tower No. 1 at a location 400 feet closer to Pacific Coast Highway and 10 feet taller than existing Surge Towers Nos. 1 and 2. Because of this change, staff believes that Supplement No. 3 to our 1989 Program Environmental Impact Report should be completed. 1 In 1993, the Districts completed a seismic analysis of the Huntington Beach Treatment Plant site. As the Directors are well aware, the Treatment Plant is within the Newport- Inglewood fault zone. Sonic seismic studies were undertaken to determine the location of the fault fractures and a significant fracture was found to underlie the location of the existing surge towers. For this reason, we believe the surge tower should be reconstructed at a site approximately 400 feet south of the existing tower. This year, a reliability study was completed which recommended that the standby outfall be extended to deep water at an earlier date than year 2005 (the year shown in our 1989 Master Plan) based on higher observed wet weather peak flows than previously estimated. The design of the surge tower replacement, now in progress, indicates that the surge tower should be 10 feet higher than shown in the 1989 Master Plan. Surge Tower No. 1 was constructed in 1959 and extended in 1976 to an elevation 69 feet above sea level. For reference, the ground elevation is approximately elevation 12 in the Treatment Plant. Existing Surge Tower No 2, which serves our on-line 120-inch ouffall, was raised to elevation 88 feet six years ago. The 1989 Master Plan assumed that Surge Tower No. 1 would be reconstructed to the same elevation, 88 feet above sea level. However, the design calculations now being performed show that Surge Tower No. 1 should be constructed to elevation 98 feet to provide hydraulic capacity to switch flows to either the existing 120-inch, 5 mile ouffall, or the planned 120-inch reconstruction of the existing 78-inch ouffall which is planned to be longer and thereby requiring more hydraulic head (a taller surge tower). The reliability option of directing 100% of the flow to either ouffall is the main reason that Surge Tower No. 1 is recommended to be reconstructed 10 feet higher than originally planned. CEQA ACTIONS In August, the Directors found that this project could have a significant affect on the environment, and authorized that circulation of an Initial Study and Environmental Impact Assessment, and preparation and circulation of Draft Supplement No. 3. The initial study and Environmental Impact Assessment was circulated to local, regional and state agencies in accordance with CEQA, and the following responses were received: Agencv Response • County of Orange, Environmental No Comment Management Agency • California Coastal Commission Analyze impacts on Santa Ana River mouth estuary, visual impacts • State of California, Water Information regarding State loans, Resources Control Board dewatering impacts • City of Newport Beach None • City of Costa Mesa None 2 a.. • Costa Mesa Sanitary District None • SCAG None • Orange County Water District None • CALTRANS None Draft Supplement No. 3 has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Public Resources Code Section 21000, at seq., and Administrative Code Section 15000 , at seq., as amended. The Districts are the lead agency for this draft supplement with principal responsibility for approving the required entitlements of the proposed project and implementing construction and environmental impact mitigation. Appropriate mitigation measures will be incorporated into the Findings and Mitigation Monitoring Plan adopted by the Districts' Boards of Directors. Subsequently, they will be incorporated into any design specifications for the approved project. SUMMARY Draft Supplement No. 3 has addressed all responses received as a result of the circulation of the Initial Study and Environmental Impact Assessment (Notice of Preparation). Staff is, therefore, recommending the following actions: 1. Receive and file this Staff Summary. 2. Authorize the General Manager to file a Notice of Completion of Draft Supplement No. 3. 3. Direct staff and Consultant to address and oral and/or written comments received and to prepare Final Supplement No. 3. a�yaa�rurq�aa 3 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING AGENDA DECEMBER 14, 1994 DISTRICT 3 Agenda Item (14)(b)(3): Confer With Special Counsel David Griffin re status of litigation, County Sanitation District No. 3 vs. United Technologies Corp. Summary See attached memorandum dated December 2, 1994 from General Counsel. wpdmw a,,W2-14W JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS AGENDA FOR DECEMBER 14, 1994 [[DISTRICTS 7 & 14 Agenda Item 30: • Approve Minutes of December 1, 1994 Selection Committee Meeting • Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation • Improvements to Main Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7-1, and Abandonment of Nine District No. 7 Pump Stations, Contract No. 7-14 • Consideration of Addendum No. 1 • Original Contract Amount: $216,168 • This Addendum: $ 99,420 • Total Amended Contract Amount: $315,588 Summary Attached are the minutes of the Selection Committee Meeting and a Staff Report outlining the proposed additions to the scope of work for Contracts Nos. 7-7-1 and 7-14. Budget Information The budgeted amount for design of these projects is $550,000 for FY 94-95. Staff Recommendation Approve Minutes of December 1, 1994 Selection Committee Meeting, and receive and file Selection Committee Certification and approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation, providing for additional design services for Improvements to Main Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7-1, and Abandonment of Nine District No. 7 Pump Stations, Contract No. 7-14, for an addition of$99,420 to the contract, increasing the total authorized compensation from $216,168 to an amount not to exceed $315,588. e1QW61pt1Jb121495.8W II AGENDA ITEM NO. 30 County Sanitation Districts v of Orange County,California P.O. Box 8127. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714) 962-2411 MINUTES OF DISTRICTS NOS. 7 AND 14 SELECTION COMMITTEE Thursday, December 1, 1994 at 5 p.m. A meeting of the Selection Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 7 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Thursday, December 1, 1994, at the Districts' administrative offices in the office of the Director of Engineering. The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: SELECTION COMMITTEE: STAFF PRESENT: Barry Hammond, Chair, District 7 Jahn D. Linder, Director of Engineering Peer Swan, Chair, District 14 Chuck Winsor, Project Manager ..m CONSIDERATION OF ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION RE IMPROVEMENTS TO MAIN STREET PUMP STATION, CONTRACT NO. 7-7-1. AND ABANDONMENT OF NINE DISTRICT NO. 7 PUMP STATIONS, CONTRACT NO. 7-14. In February 1990 the Directors approved the Professional Services Agreement for this project. The Main Street Pump Station, which was completed in March 1987, has been pumping both Districts Nos. 7 and 14 flows to Plant No. 1 via the Sunflower Trunk, which is nearing full capacity. This project will modify the Main Street Pump Station to provide pumping of all flow to the currently under construction Baker-Gisler Interceptor (which is scheduled for completion in April 1995). The Main Street Pump Station improvements will increase capacity from 25.5 mgd to 40.4 mgd and change the maximum dynamic head from 50 to 63 feet. Many technical, code and monitoring considerations have caused the Scope of Work to expand. These include, for example: • New electrical code requirements for combustible gas and hazardous applications. • New Districts' design requirements addressing equipment reliability. • New code requirements requiring that emergency generators be located in a building separate from the pump station. Technology advances affecting the design the new pump station control and telemetry systems. yid New Districts' standards for achieving compatibility of control systems at our pump stations and treatment plants. Minutes of Districts 7 and 14 Selection Committee Meeting December 1, 1994 Page 2 .d Staff has provided resolution on some of the elements that are to be incorporated in this expansion and has identified items where further investigation is desired during the project report phase, which will enable staff to finalize the concept upon which the final design will proceed. Several of these items will require additional effort on the part of the designer in the preliminary and final design stages. In October, the Directors authorized staff to negotiate with Addendum No. 1 with Boyle Engineering for the extra work. The fee for Addendum No. 1, providing for the additional engineering services, has been negotiated, as follows: Existing Change per Amended Aareement Addn. No. 1 Agreement Engineering Services, direct labor at hourly rates plus overhead at 158.5%, not to exceed $189,350 $ 0 $189,350 Engineering Services, ..J direct labor at hourly rates plus overhead at 182.8%, not to exceed 90,382 90,382 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 2,800 2,800 Fixed Profit 24,018 9,038 33,056 TOTAL AMENDED CONTRACT, not to exceed $�6 315 588 This proposed addenda is a 46% increase in the contract amount. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommended approval of Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation re Improvements to Main Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7-1, and Abandonment of Nine District No. 7 Pump Stations, -2- Minutes of Districts 7 and 14 Selection Committee Meeting December 1, 1994 Page 3 Contract No. 7-14, providing for additional engineering services in the preparation of the project report and final design, in an amount not to exceed $99,420, increasing the total authorized amount from $216,168 to an amount not to exceed $315,588. SELECTION COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION The Selection Committee recommends approval of Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation re Improvements to Main Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7-1, and Abandonment of Nine District No. 7 Pump Stations, Contract No. 7-14, providing for additional engineering services in the preparation of the project report and final design, in an amount not to exceed $99,420, increasing the total authorized amount from $216,168 to an amount not to exceed $315,588. Attached is a copy of the Selection Committee's certification letters. ADJOURNMENT At approximately 5:40 p.m., the Committee adjourned. JDL:jt ry.1.L141AlYM -3- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ul ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA December 1, 1994 1e8M ELLIS AVENUE Pa eox e127 NOUWAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA W728.0127 nwea2@An STAFF REPORT Proposed Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for Improvements to Main Street Pump Station Contract No. 7-7-1 and Abandonment of Nine District No.7 Pump Stations Contract No.7-14 Sommery In February 1990,the Directors approved the Professional Services Agreement for this project. The Main Street Pump Station,which was completed in March 1987,has been pumping both Districts Nos.7 and 14 flows to Plant No. 1 via the Sunflower Trunk which is nearing full capacity. This project will modify the Main Street Pump Station to provide pumping of all flow to the currently under construction Baker-Gisler Interceptor(which is scheduled for completion in April 1995). The Main Street Pump Station improvements will increase capacity from 25.5 mgd to 40.4 mgd and change the maximum dynamic head from 50 to 63 feet. Many technical,code and monitoring considerations have caused the Scope of Work to expand. These include,for example: • New electrical code requirements for combustible gas and hazardous applications. dad New Districts'design requirements addressing equipment reliability. • New code requirements requiring that emergency generators be located in a building separate from the pump station. • Technology advances affecting the design the new pump station control and telemetry systems. • New Districts'standards for achieving compatibility of control systems at our pump stations and treatment plants. In October,the Directors authorized staff to negotiate with Addendum No. 1 with Boyle Engineering for the extra work. The fee for Addendum No. 1 providing for the additional engineering services has been negotiated,as follows: Existing Change per Amended Agreement Addn.No. 1 Agreement Engineering Services, direct labor at hourly rates plus overhead at 158.5%, not to exceed $189,350 $ 0 $189,350 Engineering Services, direct labor at hourly rates plus overhead at 182.8%, not to exceed 90,382 90,382 Direct Expenses,not to exceed 2,800 2,800 Fixed Profit 24,018 9,038 33,056 TOTAL AMENDED CONTRACT, not to exceed $216168 $99_420 �-8 r This proposed addenda Is a 46°k increase in the contract amount. The budgeted amount for design for FY 94-95 is$550,000. Attached for review is a letter proposal dated November 9, 1994 from Boyle outlining in detail the additional work requested by the Districts. Selection Committee Recommendation Receive and file Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee and approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation,providing for additional design services for Improvements to Main Street Pump Station,Contract No.7-7-1,and Abandonment of Nine District No. 7 Pump Station,Contract No.7-14,for an addition of$99,420 to the contract,increasing the total authorized compensation from$216,168 to an amount not to exceed$315,588. wpdx`e ng\7-7-1\1 21494.sr `�rrr `ram 'pn�Tlp4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 10844 ELLIS,FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 "4'pT Wpm (714)962-2411 December 1, 1994 Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts Nos. 7 and 14 of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation in Connection with Improvements to Main Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7-1, and Abandonment of Nine District No. 7 Pump Stations, Contract No. 7-14 In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional engineering services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee for Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation, providing for additional design services in connection with Improvements to Main Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7-1, and Abandonment of Nine Pump Stations, Contract No. 7-14, on an hourly-rate basis including labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, and fixed profit, in an additional amount not to exceed $99,420. Existing Change per Amended Aureemen Addn. No. 1 Agreement Engineering Services, direct labor at hourly rates plus overhead at 158.5%, not to exceed $189.350 $ 0 $189,350 Engineering Services, direct labor at hourly rates plus overhead at 182.8%, not to exceed 90.382 90,382 Direct Expenses,not to exceed 2,800 2,800 Fixed Profit 24,018 9,030 33.05 TOTAL AMENDED CONTRACT, not to exceed UL429 Vrd COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS AI ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1OMAA ELLIS AVENUE Boards of Directors ee.Box 8127 1� / Districts Nos. 7 and 14 EOONgIN VALLEY,CAOiORNIA 92>29-B+sy,.. December 1, 1994 91.19521411 Page Two The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. Is/Barry Hammond /=/pre. Cwao Barry Hammond Peer Swan, Chair, District No. 7 Chair, District No. 14 Selection Committee Selection Committee (s/John ❑ I 'nder John D. Linder Director of Engineering Selection Committee RESOLUTION NO. 94.155 APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES RE CONTRACT NOS. 7-7-1 AND 7-14 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 7 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES RE IMPROVEMENTS TO MAIN STREET PUMP STATION, CONTRACT NO. 7-7-1, AND ABANDONMENT OF NINE DISTRICT NO. 7 PUMP STATIONS, CONTRACT NO. 7-14 WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 7 and 14 of Orange County has heretofore entered into an agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for design and construction services for Improvements to Main Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7-1, and Abandonment of Nine District No. 7 Pump Stations, Contract No. 7-14; and, WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to amend said agreement to provide for d...i additional design services; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to authorization of the Boards of Directors on October 12, 1994, the Selection Committee has negotiated and certified a fee for said additional design services, in accordance with established procedures for the selection of professional services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.7 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Addendum No. 1 dated December 14, 1994, to that certain Professional Services Agreement dated February 14, 1990, by and between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 7 and 14 and Boyle Engineering Corporation for design and construction services for Improvements to Main Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7-1, and Abandonment of Nine District No. 7 Pump Stations, Contract No. 7-14, providing for additional design services, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the contract provision for fees be increased by an amount not to exceed $99,420.00, increasing the total authorized compensation from $216,168.00 to an amount not to exceed $315,588.00, as follows: Existing Change per Amended Agreement Addendum No. 1 Agreement Professional Services, at hourly rates for labor, plus overhead at 158.5%, not to exceed $189,350.00 .00 $189,350.00 Professional Services, at hourly rates for labor, plus overhead at 182.8%. not to exceed 0.00 $90,382.00 90,382.00 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 2,800.00 .00 2,800.00 Fixed Profit 24,018.00 9,038.00 33,056.00 TOTAL, not to exceed $216,168.00 $99,420.00 $315.588.00 Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 7, acting for itself and as contracting agent for District No. 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Addendum No. 1, in forth approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held December 14, 1994, RADt D.155 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS MEETING -d AGENDA FOR December 14, 1994 DISTRICT 1 Agenda Item 35: Consideration of actions pertaining to request from City of Santa Ana to waive $245,913.00 capital facilities connection charge for Ronald Reagan Federal Building and United States Courthouse in Santa Ana, between West Fourth and Fifth Streets and Broadway and Ross Avenues Summary This item has been continued from the October 12, 1994 Board Meeting. Attached is a Staff Report dated November 3, 1994 that provides information on the request in detail. The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file Staff Report and General Counsel's memorandum, verbal reports by the General Manager and Director of Engineering, hold the public hearing, and consider proposed Ordinance No. 124. wptloc,KVg pl Nbl2l4 aM COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ' November 3, 1994 W ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA +e8m ELLIS AVENUE STAFF REPORT VAMPo eox z+z] FOUNTAIN Y.CGLROBNI<B2]ze-010] n+n ezz.zAn Request from City of Santa Ana to Waive Capital Facilities Connection Charges for Ronald Reagan Federal Building and United States Courthouse District No. 1 has received a request from the City of Santa Ana dated September 23, 1994,to waive the connection fees for the new federal building and courthouse to be located in downtown Santa Ana (see attached supporting agenda material). Construction is scheduled to begin in December with completion Scheduled for March 1997. Based on the current District No. 1 Capital Facilities Connection Charge of $470 per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area,the connection fee would be$245,913.40 for this 523,220 square foot facility. Sewer connection fees are used by District No. 1 to pay for facilities required to serve a development, including the District No. 1 collection system that transports the wastewater to the join0yowned and operated treatment plants,and District No, is share of the joint treatment plant facilities required to serve the development and to comply with increasingly strict environmental requirements. There is one exception in the uniform ordinance,which Is stated as follows: "Except as may be provided by an individual District,there will be no capital facilities connection charges assessed to local(emphasis added)government agencies for connecting directly(District sewer)or indirectly(City sewer)to Districts'sewerage facilities;however, a connection permit must be obtained." General Counsel advises that since a federal facility does not qualify under the above exception, any request for a waiver of fees submitted to the District No. 1 Board of Directors would require notice,hearing and adoption of an amendment to the ordinance. As a matter of background,Districts'staff has approved a no-fee permit to the City of Santa Ana for the connection of the City's new 12-inch sewer line in Fifth Street thalwill flow easterly and connect to the Disbicts'trunk sewer in Broadway. It is our understanding that it will provide service to several existing connections belonging to local government entities and to private entities,as well as the new federal building and courthouse. The permit requirements state,in part,that: Applicant must adhere to County Sanitation District No. 1 Ordinance No. 119,effective February 7, 1992 or as may be amended by the District No. I Board (emphasis added). . " The District No. 1 Directors have two basic alternatives: 1. Receive,file and reject the request to waive Capital FacilNes Connection Charges for the new federal building and courthouse because federal facilities do not qualify under the existing District Uniform Ordinance for an exception to the District No. 1 connection fees;or 2. Establish a date and notice a future hearing to consider amending the District No. 1 Uniform Ordinance regarding Capital Facilities Connection Charges to grant the request for exemption. wpd.\m,94+16-naV.sr INNA/ r PENNY KYLE oat. 111 77 Bm Sxxx.mry R"m Imm late ANon -- PMne(714)W2 2611 ❑ MBh Poorlly A fon F. (714)862-0 6 pRoWne Pdl ty ACWn ❑ Intomutlon ONy ❑ Noteu Convey To ❑ dMf COUNTY SANRATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P.O.Box 8121-18 Ellie Avenue Fountain Wd y,CNNoma 82T284127 qpw PPIE Presentation Book Orange County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County g�13 1%g 9;c December 8 , 1994 3- E '.ek �a • F � � ^lY Presentation Outline • Status Reports Items w © County bankruptcy/ Districts' cash deposits in the County pool © Existing debt financing program © Districts' short term cash flow requirements © Districts' credit rating © Letter transmitted to County regarding property tax and user fees x Policy Actions © Provide bankruptcy representation jointly with other County depositors © Retain separate bankruptcy counsel © Appoint Districts' Treasurer © Establish Districts' investment alternatives and permitted investments © Hire bond counsel © On-going procurement issues © Communicate with the rating agencies © Establish future communications and action strategy with the Districts' Board members IV. Orange County „ O�stncl .,r �33,}} Status Report County Bankruptcy/Districts' Cash Deposits in County Pool Fjq t„ • Status of County Bankruptcy. • Districts' Reverse Repo Program. • Districts' Cash Outside County Pool. E Orange County Sanitation Districts „ , , H Status Report Existing Debt Financing Program F 3 r� e • Daily Rate Certificates of Participation (COP). • Weekly Rate COPs. • Taxable Commercial Paper. Orange County Santatlo 1� . ` Status Report 3} Districts' Short-Term Cash Flow Requirements TOTAL COMM.PAPER COP CSDOC 12/6/94 Interest on 93 Refunding 8175AOD.00 $176.000.00 Commesclal PaW Retired S4ADO.OXOO S400.00040 12/7/94 Interest on Series $268.000.00 $265m0.W Interest on Series C $162.000.00 $162AOOA0 P 0 $900JDW.00 "WA00.00 Commerelal Paper Matured 326mOmOW $26AWAW.W 12/14/94 Accounts Payable $2.000AOD.00 S2AW.OMOD 12/21/94 Payroll $900AOOm "WAWm 12/28/94 Accounts Payable $2AOOm0.00 MAW.WO.W 1/4/94 Intereston SedwA $600AOOm SmjOwm Interest on Series C S300=OD S3WAWm Payroll 5900AW.00 $900.000.00 1/10/95 Cammerdal Paper $20AWAWW 620AWm0W 1/11/96 Accounts Payable $2AW.W0W j S24W.01)000 1/18/95 PoyroO $900AWm $900AWW 1125/95 Accounts Payable $2AWm0W $2AWOMOD 1/31/95 Semi-Arnim Interest an Soda R 81AS2.000.W $11162=130 SemMnnual Interest an'92 Refunding 94A56.000.00 S4A56.W0W 2/7/94 Interest on Series A SWOOwW SlmmOm Interest on Sorles C $300m00) SMAWm Interest ort V3 Refunding $350,000m S350AW.W TOTAL $69643AW.00 I SSD==.00 I 38A4.7m0.00 1 6116W=O 0rangeo1�ntanittl y Status Report �R Districts' Credit Ratina ,R. • Taxable Commercial Paper Program was downgraded yesterday from A-1 + to C (Speculative) by Standard and Poor's. ,rw • Remaining Series B COPs have been put on Credit Watch. Status Report Districts' Letter Transmitted to County • Sent to offices of Treasurer-Tax Collector and Auditor- Controller on December 7, 1994. • Directed that upcoming property tax / user fees be segregated from Pool. • Advised that the Districts await separate advice letter regarding future direction to follow regarding deposit into new investment account. Response: Yesterday the Treasurer-Tax Collector said he wouls honor direction, but today there is now a question. Or�r1�CQUnty��lisi`t�I' ;, , Policy Actions Provide Bankruptcy Representation Jointly with Other County Depositors • Several County Depositors have organized to be represented jointly by a bankruptcy attorney. b ` • Organized representation will be cost effective, encourage u cooperation, improve communication and reduce divisiveness. M 6 �o Recommendation: Join other County depositors to form a coalition(s) and authorize expenditures to support legal firm(s) retained by the coalition(s). Orange County Sanitatidtt DWrta Policy Actions Retain Separate Bankruptcy Counsel E • Districts may require separate legal representation to protect 41111 Ilk unique interests. Bronson, Bronson and McKinnon has been recommended by General Counsel. Recommended Action: Retain bankruptcy counsel to act on behalf of the Districts. Policy Actions Appoint Districts' Treasurer and Establish New Deposit Accounts 3 • Currently, the Districts' staff is not authorized to invest or reinvest surplus funds or to sell or exchange securities or to deposit for safekeeping the funds and investments of the Districts with Depositories. • Presently, the Districts' Treasurer is the County of Orange Treasurer. • Presently, the Districts' have no access to a deposit account sufficient to handle large cash deposits. Recommended Action: (1 ) Appoint Director of Finance as the Districts' Treasurer; (2) Authorize the Director of Finance to establish deposit accounts to address immediate cash needs; (3) establish associated accounting procedures using CPA firm. Orange county-Ssnjtihdn,0Istd0CS -,"MON Policy Actions Qg Establish District's Investment Alternatives E Investment Natured Minimurnf Madmum Liquidity Pate Fees Invetnerds DepoaV Balance Lod Agaxy Treawriess Agaraed MadmumAmoura Madmum Booke]quately. Wtodgrdt and investment Fund Banker'sAoVenoss belaweisUrdllion. trasadiorsper vwthdray. (L41F) Cornneda Ppa, NOmirdmumbdarce month is IQ 4h quarter RversePapurdvuse Dgxdtl Withdrawal: Withtr vats eaningarateis .OWtimen Agreanad;Among mirdmarrd!l5000ar araladewith 24 5323PA interest earned. Chas greeter-round lots Iwurafvaxenctics only. or ASkPonthesane day but b4aeg0U AM. CallfornlaArbtrage Avaladefortac- Norninimum Inveaneasand Bookddaly. .10%onthelst= MaaganeR exerpt bond anmdmum wdthlrawasaa rNllionofa®Hsunder Rogran(CAM P) promadsody. requirererts ateladeat any time Noverter net earnings maragerea ad.08% Irwelsin raewaa507% orasasaboveS25 Treasunea million. Agardeo,Bankers Acceptances Sdf-Dreded Vey arort-term, Norninimumor Liquidity will depend on Deperdson the Rim on fixed income Irwetmet Sraegy verysaeadM nedmumrequirereAs themauntyoflhe maturity. Intherage sealritieewillvay. Itisabuyer liquid -Furdsmud sewntiespurdrasd. of475%30days),55YA bwaemaket. TheDistridscan beinvesteclacouning (SDdays) proted itself ttaougha to CA Ci errenell Code oxrpetitvebddirg proms Recommendation: Authorize the Districts' Treasurer to invest any new monies in very short, very safe, very liquid investments, purchased through a competitive bidding process and held by a trustee. Orange Count, 606 s Policy Actions Hire Bond Counsel • Certain COP and Taxable Commercial Paper related actions require Bond Counsel guidance. • Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe (Orrick) has recently served as y Districts' Bond Counsel. rf g s�r • Orrick serves as Orange County's Bond Counsel. • Orange County has not granted Orrick a conflict of interest waiver permitting Orrick to serve both the County and other Orange County agencies. • General Counsel has contacted alternatives to Orrick. Recommended Action: Hire Bond Counsel to serve the Districts and review action if litigation occurs. Orange County Sanitation Districts "N6UIM3�' Policy Actions m °° On-going Procurement Issues • Staff is investigating methods to reduce reduce short term cash demands by delaying projects, purchases and payments. • Staff has existing authority to demobilize/remobilize construction contracts. • Staff has existing procurement contracts/invoices provide late payments. • Staff has no authority to pay interest on late construction contract payments. Recommended Action: Authorize General Manager to pay negotiated interest for late construction progress payments. Orange County 38r1i1..r3S' t '' � 'EC� 'i ' "' 2, ,s,--- Policy Actions Communicate with Rating Agencies • The Districts Taxable Commercial Paper Program was t, downgraded and the remaining Series B COPs are on credit watch. • The Districts' Bank-enhanced COPs are currently rated AA/AA-. • The Districts must protect existing ratings. • The Districts must proactively communicate with the rating agencies. Recommended Action: Direct a Board subcommittee, staff and Public Financial Management, to proactively communicate with the rating agencies by developing an on-going communication forum. This may include scheduling visits with Moody's and Standard & Poor's at some future date. N, Orange County Sanitation OratnCt� Policy Action Establish Communications and Action Strategy • Staff has developed a system to regularly fax late-breaking events ; to the Directors. • Staff has limited discretionary ability to react to changing conditions. a Recommended Action: (1 ) Establish an Action Team consisting of the Steering Committee of the Joint Boards, staff and consultants; (2) secure services of an investment advisor; (3) authorize Steering Committee to act on behalf of the Joint Boards for expenditures up to $50,000 related to the County bankruptcy or the finance program of the Districts; (4) direct staff to research alternative sources of funds. Orange Count�l What. Ors ' ,', `amETINa DATE December 14, 1994 TIME: 7:30 p.m. DISTRICTS: 1,2,3,5,6,7,11,13 & 14 DISTRICT T JOINT BOARDS (6EYER1 MRMM . . .. IBOW .. — ......... .. —.. . . . ZIPFRRYI .. .......... FERRYMAN .. .... I6lIEU� .......�SARR _ n) ............ . MC GUIGAN ........ RA5 I ............ MOWN ........... JL _ ISTEWERI ......... . . STANTON ......... . COLLINS L ISCOTTI ............ ...... MALTARELUI ...... . WORMY .... .......... �G mEMn ............. COX ............. MELLI .. ............. DENES ........... . — DISTRICT 2 I 1 ............ DUNLAP .......... QL IScoTTI OLLDIS ........ — ............ .. JG ILIAFFT IJER I ...... ECIUD RODE .......C I➢CGAI ...... 1MR(!IT JI (PERRY) ............. FERRYMAN ........ (SEW .............. DENES .. IANOHISONI .......... FLDM ........... be IMAERTZWERE111 ..... ECXENRODE ........ . MONEI .............. GRNFIN........... . ROM ............ IWELCHI ............. GULLMSON ........(PARKER) ........... }SRSIR.......... .Ifil IWARDI ..I.......... HAMMOND ........ — MA) ............... NORSY............ .1 1 1 ............ IEIPZIG ........... — (LUTZ) ............. MUNI ........... . IMINEXI ............. UMN ............. (STEUIM) ........... STANTON ......... .e (MC GUIGAM ......... MATt............. — IGULMSON) ......... WELOH ........... 0, ILURI . ............. MC SUSAN........ — IOALYI ............. nMEL ............ I (PUMOI ............. MORENO .......... — MINGERI ............ IIUTT ........... . MAI .. .............. NORSY ........... IDUNLAR ............ PARKER........... I�G DISTRICT3 IWORLEYI ............ mm ........... W (ESTMOAI .......... SAPR:N ........... JG MUM .............. MUDD . .... ...... g — ( I........... DUNIAP........... .A, EPFERSON)........... RICE ..... . . ...... JL —_ WWMANI .......... AGE . ............ . (POTTSI ............. !AlIAF1lAY........ A, ILASZLO) ........ MOWN ........... J/ MSTMDAI ........... SAPIEN . .......... b/ _— (SCOTO .. ......... coLL s ........ RIARET)............. SINGER ........... JLAND — .. L SUIMI............. STANTON ......... E ......... ROM TE ............ JG of — IBONE) ............. GRIFFINUSING ........... . (STANTON)NSIERI ........... STENERMAN . .......... If _ 1 1 .......... IRIPFIG ........... A/ IMILVAI ............. SWAN ............ _ GU ............ WN ............. (SEL SO ........... SYLVM ........... INCIMC GUIGAT4 ....... AWR ............. y _— _— IGULLIXSOM .......... WELCH ........... � MAI ............... NIMMY............ y ISALTARELIA ......... WORMY .......... . — IEPPERSOM.......... RICE ............. JG IOALYI .............. ZEMEL ......... _ RLA%ET1............ SWGER ........... (SWGERI ............. ZIAKET........... ISTERIERI ........... STANTON ......... .MELVAGG4 .......... SYLVIA ......... STAFF OTHERS (DALYI ............. UMEL ............ ANDERSON . Je WOODRUFF .. . SERENSON JL ANWAR... .. DISTRICTS HASEASTAS L DEMIR . . . ... (COX) I ............. DEMY............ ✓ HODGES ... FUMING . ... _ (STANTON) ......... STEINER......... A7 KYIE ..... HOHENER ... IDEMYI ............ COX ...........•• y UNDER .... HOUGH ..... mum ... v HOWARD . DISTRICT DOREN .... HUNT ...... (PERRY] PERRYMAN......... . STIEEO ... MOW ..... . ........... TAMER .... LEE . . ......—, ICOXI . .......... OEMV............ . TYNDALL .. JL UNDSTROM.. JC ISTANTONI .......... MINER........... VINCENT— NVON...... DISTRICT 7 W SOR ... JL SHAW...... — (WARD) ............ HAMIOND......... ' *i kit JL STONE ..... ,EG IPOTTS) }} fi JI W(,A�SO4�N..y. .�. Dias" A_ YOUNG ..... IMLID01 ............ NMMSOGOO ........... DMAY........ ... sTAKTON .......... wER "^p ........... ✓ — _ FA(k�.d'E:F �0 (PER. ............ FMRYMAN......... 7 to"* 6-- DISTRICT 11 ,y-.! �CLc.v"Ti 1 ) ............ ........... 1 1 ........... LEIPZIG ........ T U ISTEGIEW ........... STANTONPNTO ......... JL _ DISTRICT.. DISTRII ............ LULU%SON ........ JG YT— mUNIAR .... PARKER ISEYERI .S.... MIKQIA ISTANTOM .......... STEINEA........... ✓ Y IDALVI ............. ZENEL .. .......... _AL DISTRICT 74 IMILLER)/............. SWAN ...,.j.F�.�...... JIL MWORMµ}M�..... YMi1M Y � M _ 4- WORMY) ........... MTIS .......... . JL /Ia-• F IJLn2 ISTANTONI .......... SlED16t........... 111 V 1214:94 PUBLIC SIGN-IN SHEET 1t COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY -2-I14 Iqq ,�uiNT BOARD MEETING NAME RGAN I ZATI ONI FIRM Please Print Please Print '�"oSG� I� S't-kl�i��ACZ Gsf� 'A e i•f\f SD SO\ 12/14/94-JOINT BOARD MEETING #4-Appointment of Directors JC: Move on to item#4. In your folder there is this yellow sheet that is a supplemental agenda and a listing of new Directors that have been appointed by some of out Cities and new Alternates. What 1 need is an action to receive and file the minute excerpts of member agencies relating to the appointment of these Directors. Any opposition? Consider that unanimous. TLW: I bring to the Chairman's attention the Board Secrelarys advised that the city of Orange has also advised us and that was not listed in the yellow sheet. Mr. Murphy is now going to be representing all five Districts from the city of Orange to replace Fred Barrera. JC: Is that right? OK I moving so fast, you can't believe what a fast two weeks this has been and a fast day this has been. I've been with other people in court all day in Los Angeles. So I apologize, I ran right by the roll call. (Roll Call) JC: Before we go on, I did announce this document that has the new Directors in It. I would like to have Cecilia Age, Bob Zemel and Mark Murphy come forward if you would. Just so that everyone can recognize you and know who you are and welcome you. Na - Report of Joint Chair JC: Just to give you a heads up. We will be reporting later in the session about the Bankruptcy situation. I will be giving you a report then which is more meaningful rather than doing it now. We've got quite a bit of information and I think progress that we can share with you. As far as upcoming meetings are concerned, I have requested that we have a Finance and Personnel Committee. It is not on your list. We are scheduling this for next Wednesday, December 21 at 5:30 p.m. For those of you who are on the Committee, we feel it is important that we bring this group together to review some of the financial matters that effect the Districts. We'll be talking more about that later in our presentation. Finance and Personnel Committee- Wednesday, December 21st, at 5:30 p.m. Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services - Wednesday, January 4th, at 5:30 p.m. Planning, Design and Construction Committee-Thursday, January 5th, at 5:30 p.m. Those of you who are on those Committees be prepared for that and those of you who are new Directors, we'll be assigning you to some of these new Committees also. As I think I mentioned in the past when we made the appointments last October we may be making some switches around. So if any of you have desires to move off of one Committee to another, please let me know and we'll address that issue. With that, that completes my report. Blake, do you have a General Manager report? 1 #6b- Report of General Manager SPA: Mr. Chairman,just very briefly, staff will be making recommendations under the consent calendar and also under the non-consent calendar to either strike or defer some of the items having to do with money mainly. #6c- Report of General Counsel JC: Tom, do you have a General Counsel report. TLW: Just briefly. There were two or three handouts inside the folders. They're really just information, non-action items. Also inside was a book. It's the blue book here. It does not require action. It doesn't even require that you read it tonight. Although during the course I suggest that you might want to listen. This is just really a reference guide relating to all the historical Districts' policies and resolutions on the investment program. It also includes some of the more recent correspondence between the District and the County or my office and County Counsel. It includes the resolutions that were just most recently adopted. I kind of thought it might be a good idea. Everybody's asking a question here and there. I'm not guaranteeing that every answer for every question is in there. Hopefully it will be a reference work. If anybody has any questions on them, feel free to call me or get in touch with me and we'll explore it further. JC: OK We will have a closed item later, but we are going to lake that at the end of the session, too, so that we can get some of these other things out of the way. #7- Minutes JC: If there are no corrections or amendments on the minutes, I'll deemed them approved as mailed. #S- Ratification of Claims JC: Penny. #9- Consent Calendar JC: Items 9a-9k. I think staff has a comment on this. SPA: Mr. Chairman, staff recommends that we pull item 9a. JC: With that, any other items that Directors would like to have pulled. Motion? Second? Any opposition? We'll consider that unanimous. 2 #12 (b)(2)-Actions re Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with K.P. Lindstrom. Inc. JC: Staff. BPA: Staff has an oral report. Margie Nellor will provide that. MN: You'll notice that there is some strike out and changes on this particular agenda item. Our Initial recommendation which we made both to the Operation, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee and the Executive Committee which they both approved, was to extend this Professional Services Agreement for two years. What we're recommending at this time is to not do that particular activity, but to merely extend the contract for six months, the existing contract at no cost. There is some money left in the contract. We do need this particular Consultant's services to help us with our Ocean Waiver and our renegotiation for a new permit. It has special technical expertise that we need to do that. Our recommendation at this time is to proceed with the six month no cost extension. If you have any questions I'd be glad to answer them. JC: Any opposition? OK. We'll consider that unanimous. #13- EIR for the 1989 Collection. Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan. re Ocean Outfall Reliability Uoarades. Job No. J-34-1 JC: This is just approving the EIR. There's no other action involved here, is that correct? Do we need a report from the Director of Engineering? John Linder. This item is for approving the draft Supplemental No. 3 to the EIR. This relates to a future contract to rebuild Search Tower No. 1 down at Plant 2. This is necessary due to new design considerations on the outfall and the fact that the existing search tower is on a fault that we found, the Newport-Inglewood fault. So we need to move the search tower. This action tonight, we have an open hearing and public commentary goes to December 31st. Tonight is designated as the public hearing to receive comments, although we will receive comments throughout the rest of the month. The actions tonight then are to have this public hearing and based on comments we get, we'll incorporate those into the final EIR. To date we've only had two letters who have responded to our inquiries. One was no comment and the other was a question if we were going to impact the levy bike trail down there which we won't. That concludes my report. JC: Any questions? We do consider this a public hearing. I'll open the public hearing. Is there anyone in the audience that would like to speak to us on this item? We need a consideration of motion to receive and file written comments received re Supplement No. 3 to said Program Environmental Impact Report. Opposition? That's unanimous. Any other discussion? Oral comments. We close the public hearing. 3 #35- District 1 - Public Hearino JC: This is a public hearing we've announced. The intent is to open the public hearing here, to take any comments that we might have in the audience tonight and then continue this item, we would not be taking any action or dealing with it. We would continue it to a later time. I will open the public hearing. Is there anyone in the audience who would like to address us on this item at this time? We will deal with it later as I said. Considering no comments at this point, Pat would like to make a motion. OK. A 90-day continuance on this item. TLW: Motion be to the March meeting. I'm not sure...it would probably fall within 90 days because tonight is the latest possible. JC: I have a motion and second so I'll consider that unanimous. #15a- Update by staff and consultants on actions concemino developments of the County's Commincled Investment Pool JC: We have a presentation to go through that will give everyone a sense of what we've been dealing with here. Each one of us is going to play a role in this process as we go through it. Patty, are you going to kick it off with the outline overview? Does everyone have the handout here? Let me just do this. On the second page in,we have the presentation outline. We're going to be talking about the Districts' cash deposits in the Pool, the Financing Program, the cash flow requirements, Cash Flow Management Counsel and some policy actions relative to the General Manager. If you go on to page two, the status of the County Bankruptcy, I will kick it off with an overview. Then we have our Bankruptcy Counsel here with us tonight that's going to talk about some legal issues and then Blake is going to get into the discussion of where the Pool Committee is and then we'll go on into the rest of the information. As far as the overview is concerned, Blake, I and our Bankruptcy Counsel have been Involved in numerous Committee meetings. Seems like forever, for months, but especially this past week since we met a week ago. There was a court hearing today, as I'm sure that you all know that began to bring this issue together. The theme that I would like to leave with you is that it's been amazing the kind of cooperation and dialog that's been going on among a number of agencies, not only among ourselves,which means the Sanitation District, the Water Districts, OCTA, TCA, the Cities, the School Districts and so forth, there's been a lot of dialog and a lot of concern, but a tot of dialog taking place to where everybody is beginning to understand what is taking place. The dialog has not just been between us, among ourselves. It has been with representatives of the County. While this issue is certainly tragic to all of us, I think we all recognized that several weeks ago when this began to unfold, I can't say enough about the moves the County made in the last two weeks. Hiring Tom Hayes to be their advisor was a very significant move. He had the charge as we talked about last week of trying to stabilize the investment pool and get some order back into place and also deal with Wall Street. If there's any indication In how the market has 4 changed in the last couple of days I think he's been successful at that and I think he's been very successful in calming the concerns of many of the investors or depositors who have been involved in the process. Along with that is Bruce Bennett, who is the Bankruptcy Counsel, and he too has done an absolutely outstanding job. Bill and Roger haven't hear this because they weren't in the room with some of these meetings, but those of us who were in the meetings with him have really been impressed with the way that they handled themselves and handled the situation and handled answering questions as best they could for the people that were involved in the process. Also, there's the selection of Soloman Brothers, which too has done an outstanding job the last week or so that they've been involved in getting their arms around the issue and creating comfort with everybody. The fourth individual I believe is the new temporary auditor, I forget his name, a former auditor from the state of Oklahoma... Tom Daxson... and he is very highly regarded as an excellent talent to bring in to the team if you will that is beginning to pull this together. Some of that is really the good news. In the process, too, there has been a variety of Committees that are being formed. The City Managers have been getting together and there is seven, eight or nine of them now that have formed a group that has hired some Counsel to help them along. As I mentioned, there's been labels that have been put on people. The Big Four, if you will, which has been the Sanitation Districts, OCTA, TCA and IRWD, that has the largest amounts of money involved in the Pool, have been dialoging as a Committee. The School Districts have been dialoging as a Committee and others as I have mentioned. The energy and effort that people have been bringing forth to try to figure out how to fix the problem have been really remarkable. They set the complaints aside temporarily and they have all been identified. There is a lot of complaints that we can have and there are efforts being put forth to deal with that, but priority number one is getting the Pool stabilized. Priority number two is liquidity for 185 agencies involved because it doesn't matter who you are everybody needs some cash. Working out the methods of how you get cash is what we've been dealing with and we'll describe some of those as we go through the process. What I'd like to do, it's not quite following the agenda, but go to the next page and have Cindy Dennis talk to us, who is our Bankruptcy Counsel, who has been with us for the last week. We sat through today, a process that the Bankruptcy Trustee reviewed with us what was going on. Cindy, as our Bankruptcy Counsel, was going to give us a Flavor of the players that are involved, the Committees that are involved, the structure that was set up and the kind of feedback that we were getting ourselves. Cindy, if you would. Cindy Dennis: I'd be happy to. As everyone knows, there are two separate filings, Orange County and the Cc-Mingled Pool Filing. In the Pool, the Sanitation District's has approximately about 99% of your dollars in there. There may be some dollars owed by Orange County, but for the moment you'll see us concentrate on the Pool Bankruptcy. Everything In this Bankruptcy case is happening very quickly. Most of it in less than 24 hours notice. So your representatives here have really barely had sleep. It's up and tomorrow 5 morning we start again. Today, what we did was we spent all day at the U.S. Trustee's office. The U.S. Trustee has a very interesting position in the Chapter Nine Bankruptcy and it may be that it has no position. However, with the consent of the debtor and with the creditors not objecting, Committees were formed today that will essentially represent anyone who is a creditor in either Orange County or in the Pool. What I'd like to do is to tell you who are the members of the Committee so that you can understand how this is going to work. In the Pool Bankruptcy, there are seven members who consist of the Committee. The Orange County Transportation Authority, Orange County Transportation Corridor Agencies, Orange County Sanitation Districts and Orange County Water District. Then very interesting, three separate spots and that is for the Orange County cities, she chose the city of Irvine to be the representative, but there will be a Subcommittee of any of the cities who are interested in joining the Subcommittee. So if you're a city, but you're not Irvine, then you have a role within the Subcommittee. Then they went on and set up another Subcommittee similar to that for the Non-Orange County cities. The representative is Mountain View, but if you happen to be a Non-Orange County city, then you're on that Subcommittee if you wish to be. The last which would be the seventh group, is the School Districts and the Orange County Department of Education is the representative on that group again with a Subcommittee. One of the things that the Trustee came in and talked to the members of the group and stressed to them was that you're not just there looking after your own interests, but you are fiduciary so not only essentially do the Districts have to worry about themselves, but they also have to worry about everybody that is an investor in the Pool. There was a lot of discussion about confidentiality agreements and a lot of discussion, which I'll go into later, about expenses that she does not want us to incur. If you are a creditor of Orange County then we have a sort of Amorphus Committee because it really hasn't been set as firth as the other Committee. That is that we have three indentured Trustees who represent large bond interests. Those three are set. Their names are Bank of America, First Cal, whatever the Banks names are, the three indentured Trustees who represent the bond holders. Then there will be appointed at a later time one to two vendors. The vendors were to go over and meet among themselves and decide who was going to be that representative. Then the Committee, she said, might be open to more. I think there was another unnamed holder of$6 million. They didn't even know the name of who that entity was but that was also named to the Committee. After the big meeting I have to tell you there were at least a hundred business people there and as usual there were double the amount of lawyers. It was a very large meeting with everybody vying for a position. It's very fortunate that the District's are in a position to be participating as a member of the Pool. After that we dropped to the Pool meeting which was now separate from the Orange County group. The members of that Committee sat around and talked. Once again, Ms. Tiffany came in and lectured the Committee about how important it was to keep the cost down. The Committee itself will hire Counsel which the interview process begins tomorrow morning. Each of the seven constituents all had their own Counsel. In other words, I'm there for the Districts, 6 but there's going to be one Counsel who will represent the Committee. That interview process begins at 7 a.m. tomorrow morning. Her concern was that Committee Counsel, whoever is selected, does not spend all of your money. There was a large lecture on how to do things expeditiously. She wanted to see a cooperative lawyer chosen and did not want to see a lot of court action. Of course since this is a Chapter Nine, you're going to see a lot of meetings. You're going to see your representatives be in long meetings and we will not be taking a lot of court action. Is there anything else you want covered? JC: I think that kind of gives you a view. George. George Brown: I wrote down six Committees (named six that he had) . (What was the seventh?) JC: TCA. BPA: TCA and OCTA. CD: They know the initials. JC: That kind of gives you a Flavor of it. I'm sorry, Jim. Jim Ferryman: Are any of the Special Districts getting any representation? CD: Special Districts did not get any representation on the Committee. It was brought up by someone in the audience saying that there is no representative from the Special Districts. The U.S. Trustee said I know it and this is the Committee. Afterwards I think we sort of found her backing down and saying if you really think that you have such a special interest that can't be taken care of by these others make a written application and she would consider it. I suppose those that feel unhappy with that always have resort to the court. JC: The numbers that they are working with are seven, nine or eleven would be the representatives. Apparently the law sets that out and she was open to expanding it if necessary. I think the message that was real loud and clear and I want to comment about this, Marci Tiffany, I found and many of us found, was absolutely outstanding. You couldn't have asked for anybody to participate in this that would be any better than she. She understood the issue. She understood the issues from everybody that was involved. Very firm, took control, provided the leadership position and it wasn't a lot of haggling that was going on because she knew what she wanted to do. I think what is also important that she made clear to us that everybody that is on this Pool Committee has a fiduciary responsibility as Cindy stated for everybody. Not just themselves, but everybody in the County. Every man, woman and child has to be considered when you are making your decisions. In doing that we noted, even though she wasn't explicit about that, that the implication was that as the Orange County Sanitation District we have a responsibility to other Sanitation Districts in this County to certainly be carrying any message that they might have of concern. The same is also true of the Water Districts and the School Districts naturally have their representatives, too. She was looking at us of interest In common. Even though it's Orange County Sanitation that's 7 there, we have got to be looking out for people that are in our industry at the same time, Jim. So that's how that kind of plays out and again she's open to consideration. With that as a back drop, Blake will go in and talk more about the Pool Committee and where we're going from here. BPA: Thank you Mr. Chairman. The Orange County Pool Committee is really going to be where the rubber meets the road in terms of the direct communication between the Orange County family and the two major players within the Hall of Administration that are trying to bring this an early closure, that is Hayes and Bennett. The Committee was formed as Cindy mentioned. Let me tell you who the players and the personalities are which will give you a flavor, I think, if you know these individuals. The Chair of the Committee will be Stan Oftlie with OCTA. Stan's been around for a long time and has direct access to many of the major players in the County and will really be helpful in maintaining the kind of communication that we need through the next few weeks. The Vice Chair is Paul Brady. He is the Irvine City Manager. His role is going to be important because he represents some of the smaller entities that are involved in all this. Remember there is over 180 public entities that involved in this Pool. Paul, also as the Chair of the Orange County Cities, the Subcommittee, will be in direct contact with the following Cities which so far have been named to the subcommittee and that includes Fountain Valley, Newport Beach, Brea, Anaheim, Huntington Beach, Buena Park, Costa Mesa, Mission Viejo, Orange, Irvine and Santa Ana. These are the Cities that had actually provided a piece of paper to the Trustee saying that they wanted in formally and so they went into that Subcommittee. The other representatives include myself, for the Orange County Sanitation District, Wally Kreutzen, for the TCA, he is the Executive Vice President over there, Andy Czomy, who is the Chief Financial Officer with the Orange County Water District and Michael Mortello, who is the City Attorney for the city of Mountain View and is also one of the Subcommittee Chairs and that includes Milpitas, Santa Barbara, Montebello and Mountain View. The School Districts' representative is John Nelson. He is with the Orange County Department of Education and that is a real mish-mash of probably 30 or 40 different school districts. He'll be chairing that Subcommittee. I found all seven of us willing to agree easily on issues. So far here is what has happened with that group of seven. One of the things we've done is we've reaffirmed what had up to that point been a relatively informal agreement amongst some of the players in the Orange County family. That is we need an initial cash draw within the next week to take care of our short term payroll, accounts payable and any calls that are going out on some of the paper that is out and around the County. The figure for the group that we have so far told is about$117 million and we'll be talking to the County about that. Stan OHlie will be talking to Bruce Bennett about that within the next 24 hours. We've also reaffirmed our interest in proposing an initial cap of need on being able to draw from the large Pool. Sorting out whatever is left in the Pool and how that gets divided up among the 180 or so players is going to be a very difficult task, but if we can come up with at least the preliminary cut that is conservative enough that everybody is going to be comfortable with the initial disbursement, we'll at least get money out into the various agencies. That is also 8 something that the Committee has reaffirmed and again we'll be talking to Bennett and Hayes about that in the next 24 hours. That's the 30%. What we're talking about, and this is a working number right now, is 30%of your initial investment would become available in short order. That is the concept. There will be a meeting tomorrow morning at 9:00 a.m. at the Hall of Administration for all of the various representatives of those 180 entities. The word is being passed out and that is going to be an interesting meeting. We're going to need a football stadium for that one. But the sense of that meeting is to get everyone else up to speed about what this core group is working on to try to reach early resolution and fair resolution for all of the players that are creditors on the Pool. I guess I would just really emphasize the importance of the overall tone that has occurred in all of this. Would you put that one slide up for a moment? I touched on this on the...this represents two things that are conceptual at the moment. The initial investment for the entire Pool was approximately$7.48 billion. Of that, and we still have to check these figures, but we believe that the Sanitation Districts had $441 million. Assuming the 27% loss that Hayes mentioned two days ago you can see what the deduct is on the Pool and on our portion of the Pool with those net values of$5.5 billion in the Pool and somewhere around $327 million for the Sanitation Districts. The end of week draw that we are talking about right now for the Pool itself we are talking about $117 million, plus other people we haven't even heard from yet including the County. We're asking for$28.7 million. That covers a $26 million default on commercial paper from last week as well as to meet our payroll and accounts payable cycles coming up in the next two weeks. Then the necessity draw, that 30% cap of the initial investment, that would amount to $2.24 billion for the entire pool and for the Sanitation Districts that would be $132 million. We'll get to that figure later in the presentation, but I wanted to at least give you in round numbers what we're talking about today. As Cindy mentioned this is changing very quickly. These are the numbers that we have in mind conceptually as of this moment. The meeting tomorrow at 9:00 a.m. will probably shift some of that and what we end up hearing from Bennett and Hayes will probably shift it some more. But in round numbers, that is the concept. The next thing I'd like to do is go back. Before I go any farther, are there any questions up to this point? OK Let's move back to page two. I'd just like to say that during December, the District's property tax revenues will be $12 million. That has been confirmed by the County that they will release that amount of money at our call. User fees, this is the post-petitioned user fees. It will be coming in on the property tax and is approximately another$24 million. Round figures. We do have written confirmation now from the County that they are prepared to make those releases as the money comes in. I'm sorry. What did I say wrong? Patty G.: Property tax is $12 million and User fees are$20 million. BPA: OK. $12 million and $20 million. I'm sorry. So that is some immediate cash that will be coming in. That represents in the neighborhood of 40% of what our income would be odd of taxes and user fees for the next year so there will be other monies coming in. That gives us a considerable amount of comfort in the cash in that we'll have available on the short and medium term. We'll get into more detail on that in a moment. 9 With that, let's turn to page three and I'd like to turn that over to Patty. Patty Gorzcyca: A brief status report on the existing debt financing program, but before I begin this I would just like to echo John's and Blake's comments about the cooperation and support that we've been receiving with regard to participants in the Financing Program as well. We've had liquidity banks providing letters to the market place indicating that they will stand by their commitments. We've had investment bankers providing information as it's available. We've had liquidity providers who may be extending liquidity and insurance to us potentially in the future. So we've seen the same sort of support and cooperation as we have on all fronts here. To begin with we have$244.5 million in daily rate Certificates of Participation. Those issues are currently at 6.5% interest today. Tomorrow the daily rate COP's at the $160.6 million will be reset. The remarketing agent is telling us is they will be reset at 4.7%. This last week they've been at 7%. Se we're real encouraged to see the market reading this way to our paper and seeing that rate coming down. We also $46 million fixed rate COP's and Blake mentioned a little bit about the $50 million taxable commercial paper program. Lehman continues to hold the $26 million paper that rolled over on December 7. The next $20 million matures on January 10. We met with them yesterday. It was a very cooperative meeting. They've confirmed that they will continue to hold and work closely with the District's. FIGC, which is a liquidity provider and insurer, also was in that meeting and will potentially be providing liquidity should we decide to lake out that program. Finally, the last item, the reverse repurchase agreement. You can basically delete this $100 million figure you see up on the chart. You might recall that the Sanitation District's had purchased two $50 million Fannie Mae securities which rolled on November 28 and December 2. These reverse repo loans were provided by Smith Barney. On December 7 Smith Barney sold those securities as part of the collateral liquidation that was occurring with regard to the County Pool. The County informed us this evening that the loan proceeds and premiums associated with the loan proceeds have been recovered so essentially this issue has been resolved. PG: I can give you the exact figures. Basically what happened is we entered into loans a total of which were $88.49 million. Those loans have now been received...the proceeds from those loans have been received from Smith Barney with a $2.3 million premium associated with those loans for a total of$90.84 million coming to the District's cash reserves essentially. So what we see at this point is a $9 million loss of market value in securities which is what we anticipated. John Collins: Was this $90 million is cash reserves ? PG: Gary, you had that conversation if you want to elaborate on it. Gary Streed: Our money was always in the Pool. The $90 million Smith Barney got in exchange for the securities. Our securities they sold, they got the money. We owed them some money. Now we don't owe them that money anymore. But we lost $9 million in the process. 10 JC: In simple terms, this was $100 million worth of collateral that sold for$90+ million. We lost $9+million on it. George Brown: ? JC: Right. John. John Gullixson: We actually lost$27 million. Is that correct? BPA: No. The 27% is the round number estimate of what the Pool loss is, the 27% of the entire County Pool. We've been applying that 27% to our$441 million. We're operating under that assumption. That is worst rase. It may be that we're something less than 27% loss. For that very reason, if that$100 million only saw a 9% loss then you can figure out the math yourself. I'm not sure what that is, but it makes it less than 27% loss. That's just operating assumptions right now in very round figures. John Collins: Of$100 million, Blake, SPA: The question is whether or not the 27% applies to $441 million or$340... John Collins: My question was how much money was in that Pool JC: OK Any other questions? Ted Moreno: collateral is liquidated? JC: Our collateral. Part of all the collateral is liquidated. TM: JC: Right. This is Smith Barney only that liquidated. TM: What part of the$? million ? JC: Well, trying to segregate whose was where is hard to do. The bottom line is that this was sold on December 7 when a lot of other sales were going on. Barry Hammond: _ aggregate quote of 27% loss throughout the entire pool, I would assume in looking at that there is an assumption that at least some of the losses are 5, 10, and 15% and some of the paper losses are 30, 40 and 50%, ?% and that is how we get to that number? PG: Right. SPA: Something like that. Peer Swan: I think the orders of magnitude are a little high, Barry, but I think that our position is probably going to be that we lost $9 million on this and not 27%. 11 BH: I was trying to get the big picture. Reason that sold at a higher discount BPA: The bottom line is our loss is maybe less than 27%, but we don't have that all sorted out yet. PG: We were actually expecting a higher loss. We were expecting closer to $11 million. George Brown: I think what they're saying is you've got a 27% loss on the $341 thousand. We've got a 9% loss on $100,000, BH: 30 to 40% loss on other paper, right, potentially? JC: It could be if it averages... that's right. Whatever the numbers are, it's averages. BPA: This gets very complex and it's one of the reasons why we're suggesting an Initial necessity draw that's low enough that we can get that out of the way before we get Into all the nuts and bolts and the very confusing Issues that we're exploring. BH: I guess what I'm asking look at the 27%there was a consideration of the junk paper BPA: Yes. BH: Jim Potts: JC: Right. OK. Anybody else? Then let's move on. BPA: Page four. Gary. Gary Streed: Thank you, Blake. Pages four and five go together. They're 13 months of cash flows. The page on the top, page four, is actually the second page. You may want to start if you want to start at the beginning by going over to page five. I'm going to just run through the assumptions on this. The first line is our beginning cash deposits. So you see in December of 94, the beginning cash deposits were zero. That was the assumption we made presuming that is what we knew of at the time that we did this. The next line, number two, would be the 30% release of funds in the County Pool. So 30% of that$441 million would be the$132 million. Line number four would be the user fee apportionment and number five the property taxes. These are apportioned periodically during the year. 9% has been apportioned in November which would leave 90% to be apportioned in the rest of the year. When this was put together we weren't quite sure if we were going to receive all of the property taxes and user fees received between November and December because some of that was received before the Bankruptcy petition was filed. So the numbers you see in here, the 12 $13.5 million and the $7 million adding to $20 million are about half of what Blake told you we would receive. So this number is now a little bit short. That's good news. The numbers throughout this report now should be a little bit larger by about $20 million. Then we interest on our cash depositor investments, other receivables, principle charges to industrial and commercial users and other agencies. Line eight is a subtotal. Line number nine is net new borrowing. I'd like to come back to that one when we get finished with the rest of this if you will allow me. The next section are our requirements: payroll, accounts payable, the two taxable commercial paper payments that Patty told you about, $26 million which is currently overdue, but held by Lehman, and$20 million that comes due on January 10 and the loss that we just talked about on the reverse repurchase agreement of$9 million dollars. So we have total demands in December of$40 million and total available funds or income of$20 million. Turns out it's going to be about$40 million with the information that Blake just gave us so those will wash. What we would like to do and this just goes on across month by month with the ending cash deposits, line number 18, for one month becoming line number one the beginning cash for the subsequent month. What we're considering doing is one way to sustain our property cash Bow is to get rid of the taxable commercial paper not by drawing down our reserves, but by Boating another loan probably with Lehman, a tax free loan which would be in the net of$46 million. It turns out that we can't use the new loan to pay off the old loan. We have to draw down the reserves. This money could go back in the reserves. It's a complication we probably don't need to be too concerned with. What we think would happen is we would have to pay about 5% to do that borrowing. Money market interest rates, we have assumed on here at 4%, could be a little bit less or a little bit more. So there's just about a push on that. If you go back to the previous page, page four, if we go all the way over to the right hand column then we see the total for the 13 months that we talked about here. Then reading down, we see the beginning cash of zero, the money from the County of our money that might come out of the Pool, the 30%, is $132 million and then all the other fees, the interest earnings on line number 6 with $5 million, the net borrowing and an ending cash balance of$133 million. If we don't do the additional borrowing that ending cash balance would be $85.6 million. That's a real quick study on these numbers. If you have any questions. George Brown: What kind of(monitoring?) ? GS: That's a very good question. We'd like to go on a variable rate, a short term security, that's backed by a bank. We have already some people who have expressed an interest in doing that. In that case the bank's rating takes over and not our own rating. Victor Leipzig: $9 million loss only thing appropriate is a cash out ? GS: Well, we have dissenting views on that. It may be part of the loss that gets us to the 30%. The worst case,just to disclose everything and let you know that everything's above Board. So it's on there. 13 BPA: There's one point of difference or at least of confusion here that I'd like to touch on and that is the assumption of what the December user fee apportionment and the property tax apportionment will be. Referring to page five, looking at December, lines four and five, the two numbers that I mentioned were property tax apportionment of$12 million and user fee of$20 million. That's assuming that we get the whole nut. One of the questions is of the monies that came into the County prior to the Bankruptcy what will be the status of that amount. We're not sure what those receipts are so through our busy day today and being in two different parts of Southern California Gary was operating with this assumption and I'm operating under full pay off. So that is why there is a difference between what I had mentioned earlier and what is shown in December. We really don't have any solid confirmation at this point one way or another. We just have to develop a set of assumptions and work out the models as we're trying to show you tonight. Ted Moreno: Why does payroll fluctuate month to month? GS: We have bi-weekly payroll and it depends how many Wednesdays there are in that month. So it's just on a cash basis. There's no accrual attempted on this, it's purely cash. JC: OK. Any other questions? Dan. Dan Welch: Are we paying interest on the money borrowed in the pool? GS: Generally the answer to that is no at this time. All the money we've borrowed we've used for capital improvements and we're paying interest on that. We have had a much lower interest rate that we pay than interest that we earn. Our borrowing to this point has been a cash Flow to us. It has been income not an expense. Peer Swan: That's not exactly true. I mean we did borrow money on a commercial paper program and that was invested. So we did borrow that. And we did have the reverse repo and that was a loan. So we did have $150 million. DW: Is the interest we're paying ? GS: Yes, it is on lines 15 and 16. JC: OK. Anybody else? Let's move on to page six. BPA: I'll take this one. One of the figures that Gary has shown our 13 month projection is accounts payable of$43.6 million over the next 13 months. What we've done is established a Cash Flow Management Counsel with the idea of trying to manage down the amount of money that we are now spending on our various operations and maintenance projects and construction work. To minimize that to a practical extent as we reorganize ourselves and establish a new cash plan and if you look at page seven what we have in process right now is: to shorten the time lag on the collection and receivables; to expedite the invoicing of current unbilled obligations; we've placed a temporary hiring and promotion freeze so that our existing payroll will not be rising; we 14 are limiting overtime to only non-elective needs to cover plant operations, emergencies and things like that; and we will be deferring all of our new construction projects until further notice. I reported last week that we have approximately$60 million worth of projects on the books to go out on the street in the next six months. We're going to just hold off on that until we've been able to sufficiently regroup to rejustify those to ourselves. We have deferred the elective purchases and major equipment. We are adding additional scrutiny over travel and training. Basically any travel outside of the county is going to be turned down until we've gotten our way through this over the next few months. That in a very short nutshell is the kind of issues that we're going to be working on to reduce our expenditure of cash. JC: Any questions? Alright we move to page number eight. This is General Manager authority. We just wanted to get this in front of you because this is what we're faced with daily and have been faced with. That's just officially authorizing the General Manager to represent the District's at the County and the Bankruptcy proceedings. That's serving on this Pool Committee that was established today. Blake was identified by me as the person to do that. We think that you ought to also support that position because we have to have somebody there and he's the point man right now. That's number one. Number two is be involved in the negotiation with the credit providers and investors on behalf of the District's Debt Financing Program and execute agreements with concurrence of Joint Chairman or Vice Joint Chairman. This is not putting ourselves at risk in any great way, but we have issues that are coming up that we have to decide what kind of direction we're going to go into before we get into the final agreement. Don. Don Griffin: ? JC: I'd like your approval of this. Yes, John. John Gullixson: JC: Well, partially because these things happen instantaneously. You don't have a time... It's like the issue of the 30% cap. Rather than have one individual say well you know it's the 30% cap and you have someone to dialog with and you're going to make that call in five minutes with someone else. Now, as Blake has pointed out, these issues are concepts that have been put forth that you need to put some kind of stable view on the table here that we're going to be willing to go forward with that, but that's why I've also called for the Finance Committee meeting next week where we'll come back and look at this and other financial implications that come before the group. JG: I guess what I'm asking 15 JC: Well, maybe both of us aren't. I have been involved as you know because three, two weeks ago whenever all this started and I was called to the County meeting, I started the participation. At the Executive Committee, the Executive Committee authorized my participation in these and so, on an as needed basis, I have been there on behalf of the District's. Peer has not. JG: JC: The policy which Blake didn't touch on was that they have agreed at the Committee is that they could bring one other individual into the Committee meeting so that you don't have a cast of thousands and ten attorneys and so forth, but it can vary. So I could be called into one of those meetings or Cindy maybe called into those meetings. It depends on the circumstances. John Collins: . On decisions that have to made immediately I ask . I'm not sure where the difference would be--24 hours, 36 hours or 48 hours, but something beyond the 24 to 48 hours I would want to have maybe something...some other additional resources provided record JC: I think as you may recall last meeting last week we took the action to identify the Executive Committee that would be on call for any kind of emergency action we need to take and involvement on behalf of the Bankruptcy proceedings. That's still in place in my view. That we still need to do that for that purpose. John Collins: If there's something beyond the time frame. What time frame? JC: It could be three days. This thing changes daily. We have issues which come up where somebody says we have to meet tomorrow. Ask the Board of Supervisors, they have been meeting morning, noon and night into midnight and they never know from one day to the next, but that happens. John Collins: My concept is fine on immediate things, I would just like to give a discussion on what would happen beyond a certain time. JC: Anybody else? I have a motion and a second on this. Any opposition? One opposition (Gullixson). That wraps this up. Is there any other questions about this issue? I know this is sensitive. There's a lot of uncertainty. There's a lot of need to know and we don't want to be running this too fast by you. Sal. Sal Sapien: Are we placing the Director of Finance on the Cash Flow Management Counsel? BPA: We moved It to the controllers to be able to divide some of Gary's responsibilities so that he can be working on the long term financial and investment issues. His controller's in contact with him, but I need someone who is down in the trenches. The controller who is the one who is watching the books and can help me manage our cash flow. JC: Running the numbers. Yes, Dan. 16 Dan Welch: Quick question. Is this 30% deducted Does that pertain to the overall investment in the pool or does it identify it by need for operational cost or any discussions or is it just a conceptual 30% of what you've got there? JC: It's pretty fixed at this point. Maybe the number could change to 35, but the intent is to try to create some stability in this thing so that all the agencies know that they have at least on a necessity basis the ability to draw to that number and not have to get into an argument at whether you have got rights to it or not which is what has been the problem. Some people need it today. Some people may not need it for a month, but at least it draws a guideline for people to follow. The Pool Committee will continue to review that and maybe change that number if it is doable. Pat. Pat McGuigan: When you're talking about initial investments, does that mean ? JC: Right. The original number, not the new number. If you want to relate to something, which is why we put that chart up. It's 30% of the original number. Maybe more like 50% of what's there now. Yes, George. George Brown: Why wouldn't everybody pull their 50% out right now because the fund is 7 JC: I think that gets into a philosophical issue and other kinds of things. There's been thoughts being put on the table by some that the new pool may be more sound and conservative than any you can get into and it may be in the County's interest, everybody in the County, to not walk away from it. But that's up to other people to decide. We have to keep that in mind. Yes. George Zlaket: Are the investment bankers honoring the County's Chapter Nine ? JC: No. I think you're getting into legal questions there that we don't really have good answers for. William Steiner. (except Merrill Lynch). JC: No. They've taken the money, except for Merrill Lynch. They took the $11 billion and so that could be future litigation and future action, but they're not putting it back in today. Cindy Dennis: Are you referring to the action that they filed against the one investment house that did not...that essentially violated the stay and did the big sale that hit the newspaper? OK. Litigation has been filed against that investment house and their defense will probably be that under Chapter Nine perhaps the reverse repo's are an exception. So that litigation is going on and my understanding is that the rest of them have gone whoa, we're not touching and selling until a legal decision comes out on that. So there was just one very large run on that, but that litigation has already been filed by the County. Ted Moreno: 17 CD: I don't have any clue really. It was just delivered to us yesterday. I think it was filed yesterday and yesterday we were in meetings. It's come in and 1 don't think we have a very good estimate of it. Tomorrow if it wasn't clear the meeting at 9:00 a.m. will be the debtor and they will be taking us through all these things. Not only what they have done but what they intend to do on this and other issues. So maybe we will have a clearer understanding of what they think their chances of success on that are. JC: Dan. Dan Welch: The comment earlier was that a lot of this is going to proceed by Committee and hopefully not by Court action. In order to achieve any sort of disbursement, 30% or otherwise, is there going to need to be an agreement by all public entities and a relief of stay ordered by the bankruptcy court? CD: Ah, you're getting us right into it. That's the interesting thing about Chapter Nine whether or not the need to go to court at all. I would imagine what they are going to do is they're going to get a stipulation among...you may not find 180 participants, assuming that's 100% of the investors to agree. So there may be some stipulation signed by a majority and the Committee and then the judge will just order it done. You just can't wait for the last guy that says I'm not going to sign it. I'm going to mess up the deal. It's very different than an Eleven in that the County doesn't need to go to the Judge and ask for everything, but I have a feeling that Stedman and Treaster will go to them for something of this magnitude. #15d - Review& Discussion of Finance & Personnel Committee Actions JC: This item was requested by Director Gullixson to be put on the agenda tonight. John, you're on. John Gullixson: I asked for an opportunity to speak tonight because basically I have some concerns. For those of you who don't know me, I know we have a lot of new members here, I've been on the Sanitation Districts now for four years, Fiscal Policy Committee for four years and the Chairman of District 13 for about three and a half years. One of the items I wanted discussed here tonight was a subject that I brought up last week with regards to a discussion perhaps we're going to do later in closed session from Tom Woodruff about the different hats that we wear as Councilmembers, as Directors of this organization, as Committee chairs, etc.. The problem and the concern that I have tonight is with regards to the duties that I have performed over the last several years on the Fiscal Policy Committee. Fiscal Policy Committee was just recently changed to the Finance and Personnel Committee in terms of name and the personnel on that Committee changed to some extent, also. In fact, as I look out at this group, I would say that right now Don Griffin and myself are really the only long term members of that Fiscal Policy Committee other than Peer Swan. The rest of the guys, Iry Pickier, who was around for years, Jim Wahner, Grace Winchell, Evelyn Hart and several others have gone on to greener pastures, I guess. At any rate, part of our duties on that Fiscal Policy Committee was to monitor a lot of the financial transactions that this body was involved with. As I walked in to that organization, I was introduced to some of the most complicated financial dealings I've ever seen and it took every ounce of imagination and concentration to begin to think you understood some of the things that 18 were going on. The reason I go into that kind of description is because what was happening in large part in that organization was a Committee that was monitoring what was happening in markets at different times. We would have meetings, as many as three times in a month. We would have phone calls by staff to each one of the members asking what our position was on a particular issue. There was a monitoring that was occurring on these particular financial arrangements and investments that the Sanitation Districts had made. During this last year, we had several changes. First of all, Mr. Puckett, from Tustin, left. He was our Chairman. Mr. Swan took his position. Patti Gorczyca, who was formerly with the Sanitation Districts left. That all occurred, if my memory serves me, about May or June (1994). From that period on, we had some change in membership. The membership changed again in our first meeting in November when we became the Finance and Personnel Committee. But, during that last several months, September and October, when changes in the market were occurring, there was not any real update in our Committee in the sense of models and so forth. I had some real concerns in my own mind, especially in late October, in terms of what some of these market changes were doing to our investments. The problem that I have here tonight, is a discussion that really isn't pleasant, but it's a discussion that I think has to occur because of a feeling I have that when we work together we need to be able to trust each other. We need to be able to work with each other and so forth. We need to be able to say things that sometimes are differing in points of views, but we've got to be able to look each other in the eye. I had during this period of time concerns over this crisis when I read of Mr. Swan's activities for the Irvine Ranch Water District, which I understand he is the President, and also his dual role as the Chairman of our Finance and Personnel Committee. From this point, during this crisis, during all the time that all these little events that led up to where we are tonight occurred, our Finance and Personnel Committee has not met one time. It was never called. It was never notified. Not any individual member of what was going on. I told Blake Anderson that when we had our Special Meeting last week and so forth. I felt that this needed to be brought up. My biggest problem is that in terms of these finances, I would say amongst this body, I probably end up being the lone vote on numerous issues. Maybe because I'm a little bit more conservative, I don't know. The bottom line is that I probably say"no"a few more times than other people do. And in this particular occasion I don't know based on timing,whether we could have done anything or not. I just didn't feel like I got the opportunity to do my job. I didn't get to, basically, get that call and get brought into the system. At the same time, Mr. Swan was actively doing things in regards to this financial crisis several weeks before it ever came to our attention. In the meetings it wasn't brought to the attention of the other members of that Committee. I need to bring this up because I've got to have some real concerns about whether we're being representative or whether we can be representative. I know Peer, in terms of his job for the Irvine Ranch Water District, obviously exercised a fiduciary relationship there, but I think if Tom's going to provide us with his discussion on our different hats, maybe that will waylay some of my other concerns or at least answer some of my questions. And this Finance and Personnel Committee, the only reason that I really felt that some of these investments should even be considered was because there was a Committee involved. There 19 was a large group of people who spent a lot of hours, sometimes we got there at 5:30 p.m. and were there until 10:00 p.m. and 11:00 p.m. at night going over these transactions. It was that Committee aspect that I felt at least gave us the opportunity to scrutinize what was going on. In this case it just didn't happen. Thank you. JC: We do need a dialog on this and Peer would like to respond. I don't want to cut him off for that, but John does have an issue which is why the Finance and Personnel Committee didn't get called. We did have an Executive Committee meeting two days after we found or actually one day after we found out about this. We also talked to some other Committees and we then called the full Board Meeting last week as information was unfolding. So, we were trying to keep the Board informed and members of the Board informed as best we could even though we didn't have a Finance and Personnel Committee per as. We didn't have much information to deal with from a financial aspect other than trying to determine what our crisis was that we were dealing with overall as an agency,just for your information. But I think that's aside from some of the other concerns that John has. Peer. PS: I think John's brought up a legitimate question that really needs an answer. I think I owe you an explanation of what my role has been in here and if you bear with me, what I will do is explain it and then you can judge on whether I was conflicted or not or actually whose interest I was working for. We had been getting at IRWD, my Finance officer had been meeting with the County Treasurer periodically, and had been getting certain reports on it. They said at the time that the County Treasurer represented that he was deleveraging his portfolio because we had a continuing concern that interest rates were moving against him. We wanted that reassurance. In a meeting in September with my Finance officer, I asked him to produce documents from the County Treasurer showing what the lists of assets were. When we looked at those assets it appeared that he was not deleveraging, in fact maybe even going the other direction. At that time we set up a meeting with the County Treasurer. It was cancelled on one occasion, so several weeks delay. We met with him on October 20, at which time we sat down, and I think this was related to the Finance and Personnel Committee that we were going to have that kind of meeting and look at what was going on in the County. At that meeting we talked about what the position of the County was and what contingency plans were. The concern that we had, was what the liquidity of the fund was at that point in time and what plans the Treasurer had to add liquidity. We were also interested in the sensitivity of the portfolio to interest rates and also what the collateral adequacy in the pool was. We went through an hour and a half discussion. The Treasurer portrayed that he thought interest rates were topped out or going lower. We suggested very strongly that he set up an Oversight Committee and have outside people on that Committee. We suggested people from some of the major firths in the County and some people that were reasonably wise in Finance and that we fess up to that person what was going on and review his policies with that group on behalf of the investors. He said that he would take that under advisement at that time and that he would get back to us. 20 We weren't intending to shotgun the person because we didn't at that time think it was that serious. It was very concerning and we said that we were very concerned on the situation. After a week the Treasurer had not called back. We called him and told him that we thought this was a serious issue that needed addressing. He said that he was referring or had referred it to the County Administrative Officer or through the County Auditor for their study. We didn't think that was responsive to the situation. We wanted to make a point. During the conversation, he had represented to us like he had represented to other people that he had $1.5 billion in cash and liquidity wasn't a problem at that time. We said OK, under those circumstances, we, IRWD, wish to take$50 million a week out until we bring our balance down and my Finance officer and I have the authority to do that and did. We were doing this to raise the point that we thought this was serious and needed to be notched up a little level and that there really needed to be a study in oversight. But that liquidity was not a problem at that time. Approximately two weeks later, in early November, I got a call from the County Administrative officer. He asked that I come in to the office and sit down. He said I understand you were in to see the County Treasurer and that you had concerns and recommended that a Committee be set up to review what the County Treasurer is doing. We are setting that Committee up. If we answer the questions that you raised in the meeting, there are about twelve of them or requests that we had for information,will you stop taking money out. 1 said yes because at that time we thought that there was not a major serious problem that could not have been fixed by appropriate and reasonable action at that time. He also asked me to maintain quiet while he got his hands around what the situation was. So they went out and hired a firm. We agreed by the gth of November that we had a withdrawal request in process, but after that second $50 million withdrawal we would stop withdrawals. I tell you, I've looked in the mirror many times, if I thought that this was going to go upside down I will absolutely assure you, and the people in this room who know me will know, that we would not have stopped. We would have doubled up our request and asked for that money out. However, we did believe that this was a manageable, fixable situation. I'd like to contrast the position I have at IRWD and the authority that I have at IRWD versus the authority that we have at this District. I had no authority at that time from this District to pull money out. If I had come back here, and this is the dilemma that I was in, I was not trying to get my money out because I didn't feel that it was going upside down, that we were going into this situation. If 1 had come back here and told you in any proceeding that we ought to take our money out, we've got 22 cities, counties, a whole bunch of Districts, we would have down the very thing that caused the problem to bum up last week on Tuesday. We would have had an unmitigated run on the portfolio at a time when my belief was that was a fixable deal and it was in everyone's interest in the County not to do that. I will tell you on a personal basis that I believed up until last week that it was an avoidable deal and should have been avoided. We should not have gone through what happened here. That was just a wild fire. If I compare it to the Laguna fire, it's a fire that should have been put it. It didn't get put out. It jumped over the fire line and it burned down part of our city. It is a terrible tragedy. I think that it was when there was a subsequent meeting with the County Administrative officer- -and I want to tell you this and I hope you bear with me so you understand this. There was one subsequent meeting. It was on the 22nd of November. On the 22nd of November the County 21 Administrative officer had us in again. He said we have preliminary results back from the consultants, however, on the advice of counsel we can not tell you what those are. We're going to have a series of meetings with all the participants the next week and everyone will hear next week at about the same time. However, in retrospect, the allegation that there was $1.3 billion in the fund in liquidity was not correct. That there was a considerable derivative in the portfolio that was not previously disclosed to anyone and that was roughly a third of the portfolio. We had representations quite to the contrary. The anticipation was next week everyone's going to know. Everyone's going to pull their money out at the same time. We're going to have a run on this portfolio, unless, because there's no liquidity on this portfolio, the only thing that would stop that is if the County would put a market value adjustment or some sort of penalty on withdrawals which would keep people's money in. It's the only way that it could be done. We came back, that was the meeting that went into the evening. We came back the next day, my Finance officer and I, and talked to each other. We said what did you hear last night. We heard that there were serious misrepresentations made to us which caused us to stop taking money out of the pool and stopped us from doing anything further on this pool. Next week they're going to change all the rules and no one is going to be able to take money out. Even if we put our request in, we don't anticipate getting money out, however, knowing what we knew right then there was no way that you could look at anyone and say that you have any option but to ask for all your money back and we did. We sent them a letter that said take all the money out of the pool. We believed that we would never get that money, number one, but that would give us standing to be part of an Oversight Review Committee to get in because I think we had some financial expertise in there, although we felt pretty dumb by that time, to help fix the situation. That's really what happened. We were negotiating to that. We felt that there had not been adequate Oversight, that there had to be Oversight from outside the County on that so it would protect the investor interests. That's why we were insisting on a Committee outside the County to review what actions the County was going to take on the Pool and have a chance to review that prior to being implemented. We were holding tough on that and if they did not do that we would take money out. However,we were assured that they would set up a Committee which is what essentially happened. That is the sum total. I mean, to come back, I've gone back in my mind to try to figure out when we could've said anything and not precipitated the very thing that everyone was working diligently to stop. I found no time that I could have done that. I think that I have represented all the parties. We were trying valiantly not to have this happen. We were also trying to raise our hand that there needed to be some serious Oversight in the County, that had not happened and needed to happen forthright. Unfortunately, the situation got away from it. It was inexcusable what happened. I accept my share of the responsibility for that. I was sleeping and I think I had company, but I've looked at why didn't we catch this earlier and why did you just come in the end of September to actually start doing this. JC: Peer, we've got some questions. John. 22 John Collins: Peer, I've known you for four years now and after getting to know you 1 knew you on many things. One of the things about conflicts of interest is that it not necessarily is a conflict of interest, but the appearance of a conflict of interest. Sometimes we may ask that of one another. One of the things we must ask not only of Vice Joint Chair, but also the Chair of the Finance and Personnel Committee. I understand what you were doing and how you did it and that makes sense tome protecting your interests at IRWD in your role there. Perhaps if we had a chair person on the Finance Committee that was not the same as the Irvine Ranch Water District, Financial Chief type person, maybe that person would have come across some of the same notions that you did and it would have been a balance and clearly not an appearance of conflict of interest. Have you considered perhaps giving that position up? PS: I'm willing to take whatever recommendations you would have. I'm not suggesting that I would do that voluntarily, but if the body feels that they want to do that, I would ask that if you were in the position and you were trying not to have a run on the pool, how would you have done it differently. John Collins: I would not put myself in a position where I was representing two major agencies and two major players. I called Blake Anderson the day I read in the paper and I know the paper says stuff that isn't always true, but when I read in the paper that Peer Swan was trying to pull Irvine Ranch Water money out and you and I spent 35 minutes in the parking lot the night before discussing this issue and others and that never came up. This stuff you never mentioned, we talked about a lot of different things and all the concepts of last June and so forth, but that never came up. I felt a little betrayed, Peer. Were you not the President or Chairman of the Committee maybe I would feel differently. JC: Anybody else? John and other people have comments, questions. John, please. John Gullixson: Peer, I that—buy-in for stopping the run. That's what bothered me PS: I admit that and your pointing that out is correct, but the logical thing would have been if you had that concern and what I was concerned about was coming back here in a public meeting and changing the authority around so that Bob Citron was not the Treasurer. That we would be appointing a Treasurer here and be setting up a mechanism to take money out. You would have to explain to people why you were taking money out. To have any kind of flexibility to do anything would've required an open public discussion of something that was extremely sensitive. The judgement call I made, and you can criticize me on that, is if you go and bring into confidence people and you share what your concerns are and then you load the gun so you can do something. When you load the gun so the Joint Districts can come and take their money out or authorize a point person to do that, you're telling everyone in the world. You're going to start the very thing you don't want to start and working very hard not to do that. That was my judgement call. It wasn't that I didn't trust anyone on my Committee, I do that implicitly, even you John. I have a great deal of respect for you and you've been right on many 23 things. If we had said that, I'm sure what the action had to be was come back and get authority to do something. That just tips everyone's hand and it starts a cascading deal like we had on last Tuesday. That was my judgement call. JC: OK. I think we've covered both sides of the issue. Any questions or comments from other Directors? Any action desired by any Directors? John ?: I would like (this referred to the Finance and Personnel Committee). JC: OK. We can do that. PS: I agree to that. I'd say, if the people in this body haven't got confidence in me doing the job that I'm doing and feel that I misrepresented them or I did something wrong, I would really rather not stay under those conditions in that role if you feel that. I'm not going to say that... JC: We got the message. Barry, did you have something to say? Barry Hammond: . I honestly feel, and this is one Director's opinion, , I honestly feel that you should remove yourself from any position in the Sanitation District because IRWD is a major player in this thing and anyone who knows IRWD, Peer Swan is IRWD. I know you have another Board that is IRWD. You are the representative. You are the face and being that we are in such a position, I honestly feel you should resign all your leadership positions in the Sanitation Districts. If you want to be a member or if IRWD wants to keep you here then so be it. But there's an appearance that there's a conflict being Joint Chair and a District Chair, even being Finance Chair or Committee Chair. It's not just like you're a councilman on a small city. In your situation you were the person going there. You were the person and are the person people talk about at IRWD. It's a separate issue and I think because of that, for the good name of IRWD so they're protected and the benefit of the Sanitation Districts there needs to be a clear and distinct separation. I would encourage you to take that kind of step while you're going through this process so it's clear and distinct and it's not forced, but it's a courageous act to take on behalf of the Districts, both for the Water District and the Sanitation District. It would be hard to force you out, but I think that's the right thing for you to do. PS: I would respectfully disagree with you. JC: Jim. Jim Ferryman: I would like to hear comments from our General Counsel in regards to conflict of interest. TLW: This is not a novel question, it just is a novel application. All the years that I have represented the Districts I'd say the question arises once a year, usually in just kind of an informal setting. That is, an issue will come up that may involve the Costa Mesa Sanitary District or City of Yorba Linda or Irvine Ranch. 24 The question to me is posed, well how can that Director serve and participate in that proceeding when he or she is a member of the governing board of the underlying agency. It's one of the basic shortcomings, I guess is what you'd call it, a governmental agency where the Directorship, the governing body, is put together by appointment rather than independently elected. By law, each one of you must necessarily serve two masters. Trying to juggle that is not always real easy. I would simply tell you that each of you sit here because by statute under our enabling legislation, the County Sanitation District Act, your agency is the member, but the individual holding certain office be it the Mayor for the Cities or for where you have more than one, the Mayor and a Councilmember or the President of the Board of the Sanitary Districts or the members of the County Board of Supervisors. They're decreed to be the representatives by statute. No authority rests with any given Board, by example, to remove an individual from the Board. That's a different issue than the leadership role of a Committee Chair, but to remove it can't be done. That decision rests solely with the individual agency, city or special district that are Board members. There is simply no legal basis to find that there is a conflict. I emphasize that you have to look at it with a distinction of a legal conflict of interest barring an individual from participating in decisions as you are all familiar with under some of the government code provisions on contracts or under the Political Reform Act. There is no legal conflict of interest for a Director participating in those decisions that may directly affect its own agency. That's to be distinguished from the perception or the practical application of what the Board may consider to be a practical or a working conflict. It's too cumbersome or it doesn't play itself out. That's not a legal conflict and I have issued this opinion I don't know how many times over all the years. It has as I say perhaps a bit more of a unique application on the question that's been presented and just been discussed. There simply is no conflict there. It's just one of the difficult things... you have to assume that every one of you when you walk through that door is wearing your Sanitation District hat and not your City Council or Board of Supervisor hat. That sounds good and I can sit here and I can pontificate and say well I know you're going to do that and you really do. That's not to say you can't speak out on behalf of the City of Stanton or whomever it happens to be. That's why you're here is to represent their interest. But when you cut to the chase you are wearing your Sanitation hat and the law is going to presume you are acting on behalf of the District and that's why it's kind of a tough juggling act. You just all have to contend with that. JC: Sal. Sal Sapien: Are we in the TLW: Well, I hate to pass judgement because I don't know, I don't have personal knowledge of what information anybody whether it's Mr. Swan or anyone else had. I'm not in possession of that data. . Time would certainly be a factor, too and I just don't have enough facts that I could say that is. I think, my opinion stands, I don't vary from the opinion, that if the facts show that somebody was in possession in showing detailed information knowing that it was in fact being mismanaged, I think I just heard from Director Swan a few minutes ago, he thinks they got a bunch of blindsided information from them. Maybe they did, 25 maybe they didn't. I don't know, but that's what he certainly believes. I think there's nothing before me that would indicate it. It stands and you just have to look at the facts and make that decision. Sal Sapien: JC: Sal just said that because they withdrew$50 million it appears that he knew some information than otherwise say that there was something wrong with the thing. Well, I think you've heard the two reports and we could go on and on and belabor this I suppose. We're probably not going to answer the question. John asked that this be put before the Finance Committee and we'll do that. We'll discuss it there and other action that needs to be taken we'll come back and talk about it again next month. We'll see what the Finance Committee does from here. Is that OK? Sal Sapien: May I request that it's also reviewed by the Executive Committee? JC: That's fine. That's a good idea. We'll do that, too. It's a request that he can make and anybody can make so we'll honor that request, both requests and Sal's, too. Let's move on. Jim, you had an item you wanted that's under new business that you just wanted to raise. I know it's not agendize where you , but I think we just bring it to everyone's attention. Jim Potts: I was going to bring this up at the end when they ask for Directors and not be a rat bailing from a sinking ship because I don't think this is. Tracey Worley and I were going to get off this Board months ago. . I don't think there's much difference, you know you gush a toilet in Tustin or Seal Beach and the system has to work. It doesn't matter if you don't have representatives on your Board. It's been nice meeting everybody here. Nice working with some of the people. There's a lot to learn, but I really don't think that we need a 42 member Board of Directors. I don't even think we need a 28 member Board of Directors. I think we all have to look inwardly. We talk reduced government. We talk all these things. If you look at Costa Mesa, Garden Grove, Midway City and Irvine Ranch Water, there are five members and they are elected. I think that we could get by with five elected members here or nine or nine members appointed by the League of Cities if that were to be the case or 28. If all of us through our own good said let's reduce the number down to 28, that's still almost an unmanageable Board. I just encourage you, it's leadership by example. Tracey and I will leave. I encourage the other Cities to not have more than one representative. I would like to see the nine districts reduced to one. Maybe we had an horse and buggy back in the old days and had to have separate districts to get down here. But with fax machines and communications I don't think there's a need for nine districts anymore. I would like to see it at one. I would like to see maybe nine members representing. I asked a couple people in this room how come we have a district number 14, but only nine districts. A lot of people couldn't answer that. We don't even remember. We've been doing it the same way for so long that a lot of us don't know. So I would encourage this to be brought 26 up. Since I won't be here I can't, but one district, maybe seven members,whatever, to be appointed through the League of Cities for a streamlined government. I think we could do a very effective job. JC: OK. Thanks, Jim. This is just his parting remarks. He's not going to be back apparently. With that, is there any other new business with any of the Districts? We can adjourn accept for District 3. Roger Stanton: if he's not going to be back again, I want to (Applause) JC: Thanks, Jim. Appreciate that. Any other business? We can adjourn everybody but District 3 who does have a closed item they need to address. The other items were there as a holding item and we don't need to deal with them and so we can lose you unless you're on District 3. 27 r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1 , 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES JOINT BOARD MEETING DECEMBER 14, 1994 �\oap\STRICTS Of09gL � c z � c�a a ��fCI�N�THE EN�\PpP�� ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sarmatian Districts Nos. 1,2,3. 5,6. 7, 11. 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was hold on December 14, 1994, at 7:30 p.m., In the Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary,reported a quorum present for Dismptc Nos. 1, 2,3, 5, 6. 7, 11, 13 and 14 as follows: ACTNE ALTERNATE 0111ECT0R5 0019C ORS DISTRICT NO.1: a_ Pot MCGusan,Clue Tho.E.Lap James M.Ferryman.Chair pre Met Arty.Perry hank A.literary Joanne Cooma Roper Stanton W Ilam G.Stamm Trary A.Worley Thomas R.Stillwell ONTRICT NO.L JRM Collins, Chair George Scan L Daniel T.Welch.Cau r pro been John M.GiAl'ouon Berry Denas Bob Ben Z Herman Z.Eckemode Michel Maeroweiler y_ James H.Flora Steve Anderson 3� hark A.Murphy Joss. Comm 1 1 i Glem Parker L CNis Norpy Julie L a Migeal Wlido Themes E lam roper Stanton Wiliam G.Stainer Bob Zemel Tom Daly Geoga L.Maker ShoMon Singer DBfNCT ND.a: x Sal A.Sabin,Chair William C. Estrada l Bennie Donap, Chair pro tam I I Cecilia Age Waher Bowman George Brown Frank hods 3_ John Collins George Scott James H.Fara Steve Anvil Don R.Griffin Donald Bone iliku,W,ig 1 I Wally Lim Eva G.Miner Themes E.Lulz Pat WGLigan J_ Chile Wray JWie Sa s Margie L RIce Grace Epperson Shelson Singer George L Lakin i roper Suntan William G.Steiner ..x Charles Silvia Anthony SeHagpi L Bob Zemel Tom Date DISTRICT NO.6: Jan Dew.Chair _ John C.Cox,Jr. Z William G.Steiner,Chair We tam _ Roger Stanton L John C.Co.,Jr. _ Jan Debay DISTRICT NO.6: 1 James M.Faayman,Chi, AMu,Pent' L Jan Debay,Chi,We tam John C.Cox,Jr. Z Wilam G.Steiner Roper Stanton DISTRICT NO.7: _L Barry Hamlets",Chi, Mike Word Thomas R.Saharelli,Chair pro tam x Jim Pons L Jan Debay John C.Cox.Jr. James M.Far'.. After Petry TO Marina Mgual Pulido x Mahe A.Mimphy Joanne CM= Z William G.Slamer Noger Sermon DISTRICT NO. 11: Yuhor Wool,Chic 1 1 1 1.Chair We tam 1 1 g_ Roger Stamon William G.SNaer DISTRICT NO. 13: x John M.Satiation,Chair Daniel T.Welch a Glenn Parkin,Clair pro hem Burrde Dudep L Mark A.MWtahy Joanne Comm William G.Steiner Rosa, Stanton Bob Zonal Tom Daly DISTRICT NO. 14: i Peer A.Swan,Chair Darryl Miller i Be"Hi mmo".Choi,pro tern _ Mike Weld Mark A.Montane — Joanne Cooma Jim Pptta Tracy A.Worse L William G.Steiner Roper Stanton 2 12/14/94 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Blake P. Anderson, General Manager, Penny Kyle, Board Secretary, Nick Arhontes, Corinne Berenson, Catherine Biele, Mike Broyles, Don Crapnell, John Dettle, Dave Erdkamp, Mark Esquer, John Falkenstein, John Finias, Gary Hasenslab, Irwin Haydock, Ed Hodges, Steve Hovey, Steve Kozak, John Linder, Pat McNally, Mike Moore, Margie Nellor, Rory Nelson, Bob Ooten, Gary Streed, Ed Torres, Petra Tyndall, Chuck Winsor, Mike Zedek, Paula Zeller OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Walter Bowman, Cindy Dennis, Patti Gorczyca, Bill Knopf, Mary Lee, Kris Lindstrom, Joseph Shahpar, Phil Stone ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file minute excerpts re Board A000intments That the minute excerpts from the following re election of mayors, appointment of alternate Directors and seating new members of the Boards, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed: City/Aden District Active Director Alternate Director Anaheim 2, 3 & 13 Bob Zemel Tom Daly' Cypress 3 Cecilia Age' Walter Bowman La Habra 2 & 3 James H. Flora Steve Anderson Newport Beach 5 John C. Cox, Jr. Jan Debay 5, 6 & 7 Jan Debay John C. Cox, Jr. Orange 1,2,7,13 & 14 Mark A. Murphy Joanne Coontz Costa Mesa 1, 6 & 7 James Ferryman Arthur Perry Sanitary District Midway City 3 Margie L. Rice Grace Epperson Sanitary District DISTRICT 1 The Joint Chair announced that the Chair of Election of Chair District No. 1 had been vacated by a change in Board representation and that election of a new Chair would, therefore, be in order. Director Pat McGuigan was then duly nominated and elected Chair of District No. 1. -3- 12/14/94 DISTRICT 2 The Joint Chair announced that the Chair pro tem Election of Chair Pro tem of District No. 2 had been vacated by a change in Board representation and that election of a new Chair pro tem would, therefore, be in order. Director Daniel T. Welch was then duly nominated and elected Chair pro tern of District No. 2. DISTRICT 6 The Joint Chair announced that the Chair of Election of Chair and Chair Pro tern District No. 6 had been vacated by a change in Board representation and that election of a new Chair would, therefore, be in order. Director James M. Ferryman was then duly nominated and elected Chair of District No. 6. Joint Chair Cox then reported that the post of Chair pro tem had also been vacated by a change in Board representation and declared nominations in order to fill the vacant position. Director Jan Debay was then duly nominated and elected Chair pro tem of District No. 6. DISTRICT 11 The Joint Chair announced that the Chair of Election of Chair District No. 11 had been vacated by a change in Board representation and that election of a new Chair would, therefore, be in order. Director Victor Leipzig was then duly nominated and elected Chair of District No. 11. ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chair welcomed newly-seated Directors Presentation of District pins to new Cecilia Age, Mark A. Murphy and Bob Zemel to Directors the Boards. He then presented pins bearing the Districts' new"2020 VISION"Wastewater Management Action Plan logo to recognize the Directors for their service on the Board of the Sanitation Districts. ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chair announced the tentatively Report of the Joint Chair scheduled upcoming meetings as follows: Finance and Personnel Committee - Wednesday, December 21st, at 5:30 p.m. Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee -Wednesday, January 4th, at 5:30 p.m. Planning, Design and Construction Committee - Thursday, January 5th, at 5:30 p.m. Joint Chair Cox then mentioned he would be making new committee assignments and asked the Directors to contact him if they had any specific requests. -4- 12/1 4/94 ALL DISTRICTS General Counsel referred Directors to three Report of the General Counsel memoranda and a booklet that were included in the Directors' meeting folders for their information. Mr. Woodruff stated that the booklet was a reference guide relating to the Districts' policies and resolutions relative to the investment program, to include more recent correspondence between the Districts, the County, County Counsel and Mr. Woodruff's office. - DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held November 9, 1994, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held November 9, 1994, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held November 9, 1994, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held November 9, 1994, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held November 9, 1994, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held November 9, 1994, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held November 9, 1994, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held November 9, 1994, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -5- 12/14/94 DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or amendments to the `..� Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held November 9, 1994, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratification of payment of Joint and Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on pages"A", "B" and "C"attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. 1 11 02/94 11/16/94 11/30/94 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $ 976,192.87 $ 575,314.85 $ 1,005,690.78 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 1,607,155.50 267,761.74 2,204,328.59 Joint Working Capital Fund - 184,933.95 142,532.48 171.068.12 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 15,140.56 2,083.33 19,912.25 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 1,415.00 0.00 5,191.38 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 340,002,40 231,024.15 21.315.26 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 85,109.12 23,683.19 160,485.08 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 33,883.66 4,185.68 5,689.24 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 0.00 53.88 278.63 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 16,086.17 1,910.88 16,023.78 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 14,929.35 1,909.27 15,984.66 DISTRICT NO. 13 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 14 - 7,744.21 711,764.85 17,713.55 DISTRICTS NOS. 3 & 11 JOINT - 0.00 2,500.00 0.00 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 A 6 JOINT - 2,455.20 2.455.07 0.00 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 &7 JOINT - 2,664.51 0.00 0.00 DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 4.734.84 691,17 14.59 $3.292.447.34 51.967.870.54 53.643.695.91 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Summons and Complaint. Andy C. Patterson: Jackie J. Venezio: That the Summons and Complaint for Wrongful Death Lacey Miller, a minor, by and through her and Negligence entitled Andy C. Patterson; Guardian Ad Litem. Georgianne 1. Miller. Jackie J. Venezio; Lacey Miller, a minor, by and Dorothy M. R. Holm and as Executrix of the through her Guardian Ad Litem, Georgianne I. Miller; Estate of Richard L. Holm. vs. City of Dorothy M. R. Holm and as Executrix of the Estate of Huntington Beach, et al.. Orange County Richard L. Holm, vs. City of Huntington Beach, at al., Superior Court Case No. 738179 Orange County Superior Court Case No. 738179, in connection with construction of Miscellaneous Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-49, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, -6- 12/14/94 FURTHER MOVED: That the delegated action of the Executive Committee authorizing employment of Chase, Rotchford, Drukker& Bogusl as special counsel to appear and defend the interests of the Districts, be, and is hereby, ratified. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and deny claim of Jane Kaye That the claim of Jane Kaye dated November 14, 1994, in an unknown amount for alleged damages, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and denied; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said claim be, and is hereby, referred to Districts' General Counsel and liability claims administrator for appropriate action. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and deny amended claim of Louis Sangermano That the amended claim of Louis Sangermano dated October 16, 1994, in an estimated amount to be more than $500,000.00 for alleged damages, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and denied; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said claim be, and is hereby, referred to Districts' General Counsel and liability claims administrator for appropriate action. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and approve staff Summary Financial Report for three-month period ending That the staff Summary Financial Report for the three- September 30, 1994 month period ending September 30, 1994, be, and is U hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file draft minutes of the Operations. Maintenance and Technical That the draft minutes of the Operations, Maintenance Services Committee and Technical Services Committee meeting held on November 2, 1994, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file draft minutes of the Planning. Desion and Construction Committee That the draft minutes of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee meeting held on November 3, 1994, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file draft minutes of the Finance and Personnel Committee That the draft minutes of the Finance and Personnel Committee meeting held on November 16, 1994, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. -7- 12/14/94 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file draft minutes of the Executive Subcommittee That the draft minutes of the Executive Subcommittee meeting held on November 29, 1994, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file draft minutes of the Steering Committee That the draft minutes of the Steering Committee meeting held on November 30, 1994, be, and are hereby, received and ordered fled. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file draft minutes of the Executive Committee That the draft minutes of the Executive Committee meeting held on November 30, 1994, be, and are hereby, received and ordered fled. ALL DISTRICTS Actions relative to the Biofiltration Demonstration Proiect Authorizing staff to conduct Phase III Moved, seconded and duly carried: Biofiltration Demonstration Project �. That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to conduct Phase III Biofiltration Demonstration Project: and, FURTHER MOVED: That revised costs and funding, be, and are hereby, approved as follows: Revised Proposed Phase III Proposed Total Budget item Phases 1811 Authorization Authorization Staring $205,000 $42,000 $247,000 Equipment $15,000 $10,000 $25,000 Supplies $18,000 $4,500 $22,500 Travel $7,500 $3,000 $10,500 Contracts $264,500' $30,500 $295,000 Totals $510,000 $90,000 $600,000 a The revised amount reflects[$15,000]for analytical services. -8- 12/14/94 Authorizing the General Manager to Moved, seconded and duly carried: �...✓execute an extension to the temporary Specific Term Employment Agreement That the General Manager, be, and is hereby, with Shabbir S. Basrai authorized to execute an extension to the Specific Term Employment Agreement with Shabbir S. Basrai for engineering services, for an additional ten-month period effective April 10, 1995, for a revised total of 33 and one-half months, increasing the authorized maximum from $89,000.00 to $130,236.00. Authorizina the General Manager to Moved, seconded and duly carried: execute agreement with Envirogen. Inc. for Phase III Demonstration Project That the General Manager, be, and is hereby, Services authorized to execute agreement with Envirogen, Inc. for Phase III Demonstration Project Services to supply equipment and provide engineering support services, in form approved by General Counsel, for an amount not to exceed $17,500.00. Authorizing staff to procure additional Moved, seconded and duly carried: services of contract analytical laboratories, or amend existing That staff, be, and is hereby, authorized to procure contracts to conduct necessary testing additional services of contract analytical laboratories, or amend existing contracts with analytical laboratories, to conduct necessary testing relative to Phase III Biofllralion Demonstration Project. Authorizing General Manager to Moved, seconded and duly carried: execute additional Grant Agreements for partial funding That the General Manager, be, and is hereby, authorized to execute additional Grant Agreements with the South Coast Air Quality Management District and/or U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, if and when Phase III commitments and grant funding levels have been established and approved by said organizations. ALL DISTRICTS The Director of Technical Services reported that staff Approving Addendum No. 2 to the Professional was changing their original recommendation of Services Agreement with K. P. Lindstrom. Inc. extending the agreement with K. P. Lindstrom, Inc. for environmental consulting services re from two years to a six-month extension at no NPDES Permit activities: regulatory and increase in the total authorized maximum legislative liaison activities: and for technical compensation. support for sludge management, air quality. reclamation and conservation issues and in It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: connection with CEQA compliance for Master Plan proiects That the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee certification of the final negotiated fee relative to Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with K. P. Lindstrom, Inc. for environmental consulting services to assist staff on NPDES Permit activities; regulatory and legislative liaison activities; and for technical support for sludge management, air quality, reclamation and conservation issues and in connection with CEQA compliance for Master Plan projects, providing for a six-month extension of the agreement, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, -9- 12/14/94 FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 94-146, approving Addendum No. 2 to said agreement with K P. Lindstrom, Inc. for said services, providing for a six-month extension of said agreement, on an hourly-rate basis for labor including overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultant fees and foxed profit, with no change in the total authorized maximum compensation of$295,500.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 6 to the plans and specifications for Job No. P2-42-2 That Change Order No. 6 to the plans and specifications for Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-2, authorizing an addition of$31,613.00 to the contract with Margate Construction, Inc. for one item of additional work, increasing the total authorized amount from $14,341,891.00 to an amount not to exceed $14,373,504.00, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Amendino Classification and Compensation Resolution No. 79-20, as amended. That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt establishing a Conferral of Leave Policy Resolution No. 94-150, amending Classification and Compensation Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, establishing a Conferral of Leave policy. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving request of KPMG Peat Marwick for and increase in authorized costs for the That the request of KPMG Peat Marwick for an 1993-94 fiscal year audit increase in the total authorized amount not to exceed $46,800.00 plus out-of-pocket costs to an amount not to exceed $63,861.00 plus out-of-pocket costs for the 1993-94 fiscal year audit, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Amending Classification and Compensation Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, re staffing That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt changes in Plant Operations Resolution No. 94-151, amending Classification and Compensation Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, relative to staffing changes in Plant Operations. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chair introduced a resolution of Adoption of Resolution of Commendation for commendation expressing the Boards' appreciation Charles Ealaian Nichols upon his resignation to Charles Egigian Nichols upon his resignation. as Manager of the Conservation. Recycle and Reuse Division It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 94-152 commending Charles Egigian Nichols for his outstanding contributions and dedication to public service upon his resignation as an employee of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. �.d -10- 12/14/94 ALL DISTRICTS Actions relative to Supplement No. 3 to the ' Program Environmental Impact Report for the 1989 Collection. Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan re Job No. J-34-1 Verbal report of staff The Director of Engineering reported that Supplement No. 3 is in connection to the building of Surge Tower No. 3 at Plant No. 2. He further stated that Supplement No. 3 was necessary due to new design considerations on the outfall and that the existing surge tower is on the Newport-Inglewood fault. Public Hearing The Joint Chair announced that this was the time and place fixed by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11. 13 and 14 for a public hearing on Supplement No. 3 to the Program Environmental Impact Report for the 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan relative to Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades, Job No. J-34-1. Open public hearing The Joint Chair declared the hearing open at 7:53 p.m. Receive and file written Moved, seconded and duly carried: comments re Supplement No. 3 That the written comments received to date relative to Supplement No. 3 to the Program Environmental Impact Report for the 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan re Ocean Ouffall Reliability Upgrades, Job No. J-34-1, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. Close Public hearing The Joint Chair declared the hearing closed at 7:54 p.m. Directing staff to address any written or Moved, seconded and duly carried: oral comments received on Draft Supplement No. 3 to EIR and prepare That staff be, and is hereby, directed to address any Final Supplement No. 3 after close of written or oral comments received on the Draft the comment period on December 31, Supplement No. 3 to said EIR, after the dose of 1994 public comment period on December 31, 1994, and to prepare the Final Supplement No. 3 to said EIR for consideration by the Boards. ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chair gave a brat update relative to the Status report re County's Commingled Districts' financial situation and the County's Investment Pool Commingled Investment Pool and referred the Directors to an outline that was being distributed by Patti Gorczyca, Districts'financial consultant from Public Financial Management. -11- 12/14/94 Mr. Cox then requested Cindy Dennis, Bankruptcy Counsel, to give a brief report and update �d relative to the meetings she had attended. Ms. Dennis reported that there are two separate filings, County of Orange and the Commingled Pool filing. She staled that everything in this case is moving quickly, most with less than 24-hours' notice. The U.S. Trustee's office had just formed committees that will represent anyone who is a creditor in either the County of Orange case (the creditors) or the commingled pool case (the public agencies). The pool committee is comprised of seven members including representation from Orange County Transportation Authority, Transportation Corridor Agency, Orange County Sanitation Districts, Orange County Water District, School Districts, the City of Irvine representing Orange County cities and the City of Mountain View representing non-Orange County cities. She further mentioned that the Districts were very fortunate to be participating as a member of the committee. Ms. Tiffany of the U.S. Trustee's office had stressed to the members of the committees that they were fiduciaries, and that as such were not to be only looking out solely for their own interests but for everyone within that pool. She also lectured the committee about the importance of keeping costs down. Ms. Dennis then reported that the committee will hire counsel and the interview process would begin the following day, and that the seven constituents on the committee each have their own counsel. The General Manager then gave a presentation regarding the pool committee and where the Districts were headed. He reported that Stan Offelie of OCTA was Chair of the committee, and Paul Brady, Irvine City Manager, would be the Vice Chair. Mr. Anderson would sit on the committee as the Districts' representative along with Wally Kreutzen of TCA, Andy Zomy of Orange County Water District, Michael Monello for the City of Mountain View, and John Nelson representing the school districts. He reported that the committee had reaffirmed that most important in their needs were an initial cash draw within the next week to lake care of short-term payroll, accounts payable and any calls going out on some of the paper that is out. The figure for this is approximately$117 million. The committee also reaffirmed interest in proposing an initial cap of need on being able to draw from the large pool. The committee also reaffirmed they would decide upon a preliminary cut of approximately 30%whereby everyone would be comfortable for initial disbursement which would provide money going to the various agencies. Mr. Anderson then reported that the initial investment for the entire pool was approximately $7.48 billion, of which the Districts had approximately$441 million. Assuming a 27% loss, the Districts' portion remaining would be around $125 million. He stated that the end of the week draw being requested is $117 million. The Districts are asking for$28.7 million which covers $26 million default on commercial paper from fast week, as well as to meet our payroll and accounts payable cycles coming up in the new two weeks. Of the 30% cop of the initial investment, it would amount to$2.24 billion for the entire pool and $132 million for the Districts. However, things are moving quickly. He stated the meeting the following day could change the numbers, but that was the basic concept. The General Manager then stated that during December, Districts' property tax revenues will be $12 million. This has been confirmed by the County, and they will release that amount of money at the Districts' call. User fees will be coming in on the property tax and is approximately another $20 million. These figures represent approximately 40% of what our tax and user fee income would b.d be for the next year and gives us some comfort on the short and medium term. -12- 12/14/94 Ms. Gorczyca was then asked to give a brief status report on the existing debt financing program. She reported the Districts have $244.5 million in daily rate Certificates of Participation. Those issues are currently at 6.5% interest today. The following day the daily rate COPS at the $160.6 million would be reset. The remarketing agent advised they would be reset at 4.7%. This last week they were 7%. She stated it was encouraging to see the market reacting this way to Districts' paper and seeing the rate coming down. The Districts also have $46 million in fixed-rate COPS and $50 million taxable commercial paper program. $4 million has been retired. She further reported that Lehman continues to hold the$26 million paper that rolled over on December 7th. The next$20 million matures on January 101h. A meeting had occurred the day before with Lehman which was very cooperative. Lehman confirmed they would continue to hold and work ctosely with the Districts. FIGC, which is a liquidity provider and insurer, also was in that meeting and will potentially be providing liquidity should the Districts decide to take out that program. Reverse repurchase agreements were then reported on. The Districts had purchased two $50 million Fannie Mae securities, which rolled on November 28th and December 2nd. These reverse repo loans were provided by Smith Barney. On December 7th, Smith Barney sold those securities as part of the collateral liquidation that was occurring with regard to the County Pool. The County informed staff that evening that the loan proceeds and premiums associated with the loan proceeds have been recovered so essentially this issue has been resolved, but with a loss. In response to Directors' questions, she elaborated further. The Districts entered into loans, a total of which were $88.49 million. The proceeds from those loans have been received from Smith Barney with a $2.3 million premium associated with those loans for a total of$90.84 million coming to the Districts' cash reserves, so at this point it is a $9 million loss of market value in securities, which is what was anticipated. In response to Directors' questions of whether$9 million or$27 million was lost over this transaction, the General Manager stated that 27% is the round number estimate of what the Pool loss is, the 27% of the entire County Pool. Staff has been applying that 27% to the Districts' $441 million, which is worst case scenario. It may be that it is something less than a 27% loss. For that very reason, if that $100 million only saw a 9% loss, then it makes it less than a 27% loss. That was just operating assumptions in very round figures. The Director of Finance then reported on cash flows projected in the outline provided to the Directors. In preparing the projections, staff wasn't sure if the Districts would receive all of the property taxes and user fees received between November and December because some of that was received before the Bankruptcy petition was filed, so the numbers are a little short. The numbers throughout the report should now be larger by about$20 million It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, granted authority to represent the Districts at the County and bankruptcy proceedings, serving on the committee, and authorized to be involved in the negotiation with the credit providers and investors on behalf of the District's Debt Financing Program and to execute agreements with the concurrence of Joint Chair or Vice Joint Chair. Director John Gullixson requested that his opposition to the motion be made a matter of record. -13- 12/14/94 ALL DISTRICTS Director John Gullixson briefly reviewed his Review of actions of Finance and Personnel relationship and involvement with the Districts for the Committee re Orange County Commingled benefit of new Board members. Investment Pool and Impact on Districts during 1994 He then expressed concern with regard to duties performed over the last several years on the Fiscal Policy Committee, which had just recently been restructured and is now the Finance and Personnel Committee. He stated that part of the duties of being on the Fiscal Policy Committee was to monitor a large portion of the financial transactions that the Districts were involved with, and some of these transactions were extremely complicated and were difficult to even begin to start understanding. Also, the committee would sometimes meet as many as three times per month as well as phone calls by staff to each one of the committee members asking what that Director's position was on a particular issue. To complicate matters further, many of the long4erm Directors that had sat on this committee are no longer Directors. During this last year Peer Swan was appointed Chair of the committee due to council elections and changes. The committee membership changed again in November 1994, when the committee was restructured and called the Finance and Personnel Committee. But, during the last several months when changes in the market were occurring, there were very little updates to the committee. Director Gullixson stated that he began to have some real wncems, especially in late October, in terms of what some of the market changes were doing to the Districts' investments. �..✓ During this period of time of crisis, Director Gullixson expressed concern on the dual roles Peer Swan was involved in when he read of Mr. Swan's activities on behalf of his post as President of the Irvine Ranch Water District. Director Swan presides also as the Vice Joint Chair of the Sanitation Districts, Chair of District No. 14 and Chair of the Finance and Personnel Committee Chair. He stated that during this crisis, the Finance and Personnel Committee had not met, were not called or notified. Not one individual member of the committee knew what was going on. Director Gullixson further stated that he doesn't know if the Committee could have done anything to alleviate or lessen the crisis, however he felt that he was not given the opportunity to do his job. At the same time, he alleged that Mr. Swan was actively doing things in regards to the financial crisis several weeks before it ever came to the Districts' or the Committee's attention. He then expressed concern over the exercise of fiduciary relationships with Mr. Swan's many roles. The Joint Chair responded to Mr. Gullixson's comments with reference to the issue of the Finance and Personnel Committee not being wiled or meeting over the financial crisis issue. He stated there was an Executive Committee meeting one day after the Districts found out about this. He also talked to some Directors of other Committees and it was then decided to call for a Special Joint Board Meeting on December I th as information was unfolding. Mr. Cox was trying to keep the members of the Boards informed but there wasn't much financial information to deal with in trying to determine what really was the full impact of the Districts' crisis. Director Swan then explained to the Directors of his roles and involvement in the financial crisis. He stated that the finance officer of IRWD had been meeting with the County Treasurer periodically, as well as receiving reports on the investments, which stated that the County Treasurer represented that he was deleveraging his portfolio. IRWD was concerned that interest rates were moving against the County's investments and wanted that reassurance. _14_ 12/14/94 -. During a meeting with his finance officer in September, Mr. Swan asked him to produce documents �..✓ from the County Treasurer showing what the lists of assets were. When they looked at those assets, it appeared that the County Treasurer was not deleveraging but, in fad, maybe even going the other direction. A meeting was scheduled for October 20th with the County Treasurer. At this meeting the position of the County and their contingency plans were discussed. Mr. Swan and his finance officer had concerns on what the liquidity of the fund was at that point in time and what plans the Treasurer had to add liquidity. They were also interested in the sensitivity of the portfolio to interest rates and what the collateral adequacy in the pool was. He stated that the Treasurer portrayed that he thought interest rates were topped out or going lower: It was then strongly suggested by Mr. Swan and IRWD that the Treasurer set up an oversight committee and have outside people on the committee. It was suggested that people from some of the major firms in the County and some people that were reasonably wise in finance review the Treasurer's policies with that group on behalf of the investors. The Treasurer stated he would take that under advisement and get back to Mr. Swan. After waiting for a week to hear from the Treasurer's office, IRWD called and was advised that the Treasurers office had referred this to the County Administrative Officer(CAO) for their study. Mr. Swan stated he didn't think that was responsive to the situation and IRWD wanted to make a point. During the conversation, the Treasurers office represented to Mr. Swan, as well as to others, that they had $1.5 billion in cash and liquidity wasn't a problem at that time. IRWD then declared that under those circumstances they would withdrew$50 million per week until their balance was fully drawn down. Mr. Swan explained that he and his finance officer have the authority to do that and were doing so to raise the point that they thought this was serious and needed to have a study in oversight, but that liquidity was not a problem at that time. He further stated that approximately two weeks later, in early November, he received a telephone call from the CAO who asked him to come into the office. During the meeting the CAO stated that the committee originally requested to be formed was being set up to review what the County Treasurer was doing and requested IRWD to stop withdrawing money if their questions were answered. Mr. Swan agreed because at that time he thought there were no major problems that could not have been fixed by appropriate and reasonable action at that time. The CAO also asked Mr. Swan to maintain confidentiality until he had an understanding of what the situation was. The county did hire a firm. IRWD agreed on November 9th they would stop withdrawal requests upon receipt of the second $50 million withdrawal. Mr. Swan stated that since then he has examined and reexamined his actions and that if he had any idea of what was coming, he would have doubled their requests and withdrawn as much as possible. However, he maintained that he thought this was a manageable and fixable situation. Director Swan then contrasted his position at IRWD and his authority versus the authority at the Districts. At that time he had no authority to pull any money out from the Districts. He also stated that he was not trying to get IRWD's money out because he didn't feel that it was going upside down. Also, he was concerned that if he advised the Directors in any proceeding that the Districts ought to take their money out, then there would be 22 cities involved and there would have been the very thing that caused the problem to bum up the prior week. The County would have had an unmitigated run on the portfolio at a time when it was his belief that this was a fixable deal and it was in everyone's interest in the County not to do that. Mr. Swan further expounded that he believed up until the prior week that the bankruptcy was an avoidable deal and should have been avoided. -15- 12/14/94 Mr. Swan further reported there was a subsequent meeting with the CAC on November 22nd. The `.,./ CAC said he had preliminary results back from the consultants. However, based on the advice of counsel he could not tell Mr. Swan what the results were, but they would have a series of meetings with all the participants the following week and everyone would hear the results at the same time. In retrospect, Mr. Swan further staled that the allegation that there was $1.3 billion in the fund in liquidity was not correct. There was a considerable number of derivatives in the portfolio that was not previously disclosed to anyone, and that was roughly one-third of the portfolio. The anticipation was the following week everyone would know and pull their money out at the same time. The only thing that would stop a run on this portfolio was if the County would put a market value adjustment or some sort of penalty on withdrawals which would keep people's money in. The following day Mr. Swan and his finance officer were concerned over serious misrepresentations made to them which had caused them to stop taking money out of the pool. They were concerned that the County would change the rules the following week and not allow anyone to be able to take money out. Even though they put their request in to withdraw the rest of their money, they didn't anticipate getting money out. Mr. Swan them summarized that up to that point he had been negotiating and felt there had not been adequate oversight which was needed from outside the County to protect the investors' interests. That is why he insisted on a committee outside the County to review what actions the County would lake on the pool, as well as having a chance to review that prior to being implemented. Mr. Swan did accept his share in the responsibility for the downfall of the pool. Directors then entered into discussion centering around Mr. Swan's role as Chair of the Finance and Personnel Committee and a possible conflict of interest or even the appearance of a conflict of interest. Because of Director Swan's key role at IRWD, it was suggested by Director Collins that he was particularly susceptible to at least appearing to have a conflict of interest. Director Hammond then requested that Director Swan step down from his position as Chair of the Finance and Personnel Committee, and that Director Swan remove himself from all leadership positions within the Districts because of IRWD's role of being a major player in the bankruptcy. Director Swan stated he would take any recommendations but he would not step down from his positions voluntarily. Directors then questioned the General Counsel regarding conflict of interest interpretations. Mr. Woodruff stated that all the Directors on the Boards served dual roles and as such have fiduciary responsibilities to both. The make-up of the Boards is specifically created by slate law to include elected representatives from the cities, special districts and the Board of Supervisors. No authority rests with any given Board to remove an individual from the Board and there is no legal basis to find that there is a conflict. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the dual roles of the Chair of the Finance and Personnel Committee be referred to the Finance and Personnel Committee for further discussion and action and that the Executive Committee also review this issue. -16- 12/14/94 ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chair recognized Director Potts who stated Recognition of Director Potts re Board that he felt the Districts did not need a 42-member structure and downsizing Board, nor do they need a 28-member Board, and felt that reduced government within the Districts was needed. It was his opinion that the Districts could operate more efficiently with a five-member or nine-member Board. ALL DISTRICTS General Counsel reported to the Directors the need General Counsel's Comments Prior to for a dosed session as authorized by Government Closed Session Code Section 54956.9 to discuss and consider the item that is specified as Item 14(b)(3) on the published Agenda. No other items would be discussed or acted upon. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Convene in dosed session pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 The Boards convened in dosed session at 9:32 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Board(s) of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Govemment Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. ALL DISTRICTS At 9:45 p.m. the Boards reconvened in regular Reconvene in regular session session. d..� DISTRICTS 1 8 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratifvina action of staff in issuing a Purchase order to Mladen Buntich Construction Co.. Inc. That the action of staff in issuing a purchase order to for Emereency Street Repairs to the Memory Mladen Buntich Construction Co., Inc. for Lane Interceptor, Contract No. 2-30-R Emergency Street Repairs to the Memory Lane Interceptor, Contract No. 2-30-R, for a total amount not to exceed $31,457.52, be, and is hereby, ratified; and, FURTHER MOVED: That staff and General Counsel, be, and are hereby, authorized to seek reimbursement from the City of Santa Ana. DISTRICT 1 Actions relative to proposed Ordinance No 124 re waiver of connection fees for federally-owned courthouse facilities within the District Public Hearina The Joint Chair announced that this was the time and place faced by the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 for the public hearing on proposed Ordinance No. 124, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, _17_ 12/14/94 California, Amending Ordinance No. 119, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations `�.✓ relative to waiver of connection fees for federally-owned courthouse facilities within the District. Receive and file Staff Report Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Staff Report dated November 3, 1994, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Receive and file General Moved, seconded and duly carried: Counsel's Memorandum That General Counsel's Memorandum dated November 16, 1994, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Open Public Hearing The Joint Chair declared the hearing open at 7:55 p.m. Continued to March 1995 Board Director McGuigan requested that consideration of Meeting Ordinance No. 124 be continued until the March 8, 1995 meeting. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That consideration of proposed Ordinance No. 124, An Ordinance of the Board of `..d Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 119, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations relative to waiver of connection fees for federally-owned courthouse facilities within the District, be, and is hereby, continued to the March 8, 1995 meeting. Close hearing There being no public comments, the Chair declared the hearing in recess at 7:56 p.m. to be continued at the regular Board meeting of March 8, 1995. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ad oumment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:32 p.m. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adioumment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:32 p.m. _18_ 12/14/94 DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Aulhodzino the Selection Committee to negotiate Addendum No. 2 to the Professional That the Selection Committee be, and is hereby, Services Agreement with DGA Consultants. authorized to negotiate Addendum No. 2 to the Inc. for permittinn. design and construction Professional Services Agreement with DGA services re Contract Nos. 3-35R and 3-11R Consultants, Inc. for permitting, design and construction services for Rehabilitation of Magnolia Trunk Sewer, Orangethorpe Avenue to Ellis Avenue, Contract No. 3.35R, and Seal Beach Boulevard Interceptor Sewer Manhole Rehabilitation, between Westminster Boulevard and 405 Freeway, Contract No. 3-11 R, providing for additional construction services. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Summons and Complaint. Nguyen Pham and Khanh Hoana vs. County That the Summons and Complaint for Personal Injury, Sanitation District No. 3. Orange County Property Damage and Negligence, Nguyen Pham and Superior Court Case No. 738710 Khanh Hoang vs. County Sanitation District No. 3, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 738710, in connection with an alleged vehicle accident due to an uncovered manhole, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the District's General Counsel be, and is hereby, authorized to appear and defend the interests of the District. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adioumment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:45 p.m. DISTRICTS 5 &6 Actions re Improvements to Bitter Point and Rocky Point Pump Stations. Contract No. 5-32, and Improvements to Bay Bridae Pump Station, Contract No. 5-33 Approvina Chance Order No. 3 to the Moved, seconded and duly carried: plans and specifications for Contract Nos. 5-32 and 5-33 That Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing a net addition of$2,759.65 to the contract with Uhler, Inc., for four items of additional or deleted work, and granting a time extension of 293 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. Approving Change Order No. 4 to the Moved, seconded and duly carried: plans and specifications for Contract Nos. 5-32 and 5-33 That Change Order No. 4 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing a deduction of$6,600.00 from the contract with Uhler, Inc., for adjustment of engineers quantities, be, and is hereby, approved. l -19- 12/14/94 Accepting Contract Nos. 5-32 and 5-33 Moved, seconded and duty carried: �d as complete That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 94-153, accepting Improvements to Bitter Point and Rocky Point Pump Stations, Contract No. 5-32, and Improvements to Bay Bridge Pump Station, Contract No. 5-33, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement for a final total contract amount of$1,799,421.65 (original awarded contract amount of$1,765,757.00). Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adioumment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:32 p.m. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adoumment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:32 p.m. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratifvina action of staff in issuina a purchase order to Mladen Buntich Construction Co.. Inc. That the action of staff in issuing a purchase order to for Emeroency Repairs to the Red Hill Mladen Buntich Construction Co., Inc. for Emergency Interceptor, Contract No. 7-6-4-R Repairs to the Red Hill Interceptor, Contract No. 7-6-4-R, for a total amount not to exceed $43,482.22, be, and is hereby, ratified. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file request for annexation and authorizing initiation of proceedings re That the petition from Frank Eckard requesting Proposed Annexation No. 143- Eckard annexation of.585 acres of territory to the District, in Annexation the vicinity of the intersection of Lemon Heights Drive and Foothill Boulevard in unincorporated County territory, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 94-154-7, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to the District (proposed Annexation No. 143- Eckard Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7). Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adioumment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:32 p.m. -20- 12/14/94 DISTRICT 11 Adioumment Moved, seconded and duly carried: �,...� That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:32 p.m. DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adioumment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:32 p.m. DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Settlement Agreement with Multek. Inc. re administrative Penalties for wastewater That the Settlement Agreement with Multek, Inc. discharge violations relative to administrative penalties for wastewater discharge violations in the total amount of$44,000.00, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adioumment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:32 p.m. Secretary of the ards Directors of County Sanit n Di 'lets Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 -21- FUND NO 91% JT DIST WORKINGCAPITAL PROCESSING DATE IW7M4 PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID IIMM POSTING DATE 11AYL94 WARRANTNO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 141015 AO TECH COMPANY 851.351W RESIDUALS REMOVAL M 0.10-9-91 14101E ATST-MEGACOMSERVICE 6t28.50 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 141017 AT&T-MEGACOM SERVICE $971.46 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 141018 AT&T-PROWATTS 00.49 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 141019 AT&T-CELLULARCR&R $8AI LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 141020 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS.INC. $558.221.15 CONSTRUCTION Pt-36.1 141021 AIRCLFANINOSPECtAUSTS $1,29T.66 ELECTRIC PARTS 141022 AIR COLD SUPPLY,INC. 599.38 AIR CONDITIONING SUPPLIES 141023 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS 538,222.50 O&M AGREEMENT OKY GEN.SYST 141024 AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR MICROBIOLOGY $105.99 LAB SUPPLIES 141025 AMERICAN TYPE CULTURE COLLECTION 92.591W TRAINING REGISTRATION 141028 CHARLES E.ANDERSON $1,800A0 FIRE HYDRANT REPLACEMENT 141027 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL SISSA0 SERVICE AGREEMENT 141028 APLUS SYSTEMS $574.24 NOTICES&ADS 141029 APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS,INC. $730.00 LAB SERVICES m 1410M ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $163m OFFICE EQUIPMENT X 141031 ABC LABORATORIES 71,7M.W LAB SERVICES H 141032 ARMOR-VAC $372.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES C" 141033 ARRDWHEAO ELECTRIC CORP. 5180.87 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 1410M ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE,INC. SBM.80 WASTE REMOVAL 14f035 AMSA 5225.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION ,D 1410M RANDOLPHAUSTINCO. 5411.00 LAB SUPPLIES I 141MT BFI MEDICAL WASTE SYSTEMS 559.90 WASTE DISPOSAL N 141039 BFI PORTABLE SERVICES 5104.81 PORTABLE RESTROOM 141039 BKK LANDFILL 1132,T90.BT RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO.M9,91 141NO BRW SAFETY SUPPLY $1.278.13 SAFETY SUPPLIES 141NI BATTERY SPECIALTIES 5449A0 BATTERIES 141042 BAKTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $13,637.N LAB SUPPLIES 141N3 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. 679.95 TRUCK WASH TICKETS 1410M BELL SECURITY 6779.95 SECURITY SERVICES 141N5 BISHOP COMPANY 5812.20 TOOLS 14t046 BOERINGER MANNHEIM $49LN LAB SUPPLIES 14IN7 BONA-RUES $75.75 MUCK PARTS 141NS BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. SSQ688.01 ENGINEERING SERVICES I-19&7-22 141049 BROOKS INSTRUMENT DIV. 5836.31 INSTRUMENT PARTS 141050 BUDGETJANITORIAL 53,98T00 JANITORIAL SERVICES 141051 BUSH&ASSOCIATES,INC. 514,2M.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M 08894 141052 BUY�CHEM DISTRIBUTORS ST62.91 JANITORIAL SERVICES 141M CMI $1.010.87 INSTRUMENTPARTS 10054 CS COMPANY 33.1n.30 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 141055 CAD ONE,INC. $921.64 OFFICE EOUIPMENT 141M CALIF ASSOC.OF SAN.AGENCIES 5550.00 WORK CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 141057 CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL STATISTIC $4W.W FINANCIAL STATISTICS ANALYSIS 141058 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $4,9M.64 ENGINEERING SERVICES PIJ6 141059 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $311.70 OFFICE SUPPLIES t41M CENTURY SAFETY INST.6 SUPPLY 36TB.n SAFETY SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - >r GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1W27194 PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID l lffl 4 POSTING DATE 11IDM WARRANT M. VENDOR AMOUNT 141MI CERFNET $58.65 COMPUTER SERVICES 141062 CLEANAIRREPORT $525.00 SUBSCRIPTION 141063 COAST DISTRIBUTION $446.09 ENGINEERING SUPPLIES 141064 COLICH B SONS $315.629.70 CONSTRUCTION 2-4R1 141065 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $497.51 WELDING SUPPLIES 141050 COMPUSA,INC. SIVAS COMPUTER SOFTWARE 141087 CONNEL GM PARTS 7 DIV. $189.37 TRUCK PARTS 141069 CON-WAYWESTERNEXPRESS $91.50 FREIGHTCHARGES 141089 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $472.47 ELECTRIC PARTS 141070 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC. $372.53 TOOLS 141WI CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL 00. 84,B02.59 CHLORINE M.O.10-11-93 141072 COWINENTAL GRAPHICS 8154.90 OFFICE SUPPLIES 141073 COOPER INDUSTRIES,INC. 8780.5E COMPRESSOR PARTS 141074 COUNTERPART ENTERPRISES $5.119.53 FITTINGS 141075 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $480.75 ELECTRIC PARTS ,RI 141076 STATE DEPT.OF TRANSPORTATION 817,60D.00 UTILITYAGREEMENT X 141077 STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL 8400.00 PERMIT FEES rxr 141078 DME,INC. 834.40 PLUMBING SUPPLIES W 141079 DAMES BMOORE $15.356.56 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-3 3 1410B0 DELL COMPUTER CORP. 8148.02 INSTRUMENT PARTS 141081 DELOITTE B TOUGHIE $12.500.00 FIN.INFO.SYSTEM M.0.2-9-94 D 141082 DEZURICKANDIORCSCO. 83,765.63 VALVES 1 141083 DIETERICH-POSTCO. 81,085.17 PRINTING SUPPLIES n3 141084 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $1.411.40 SERVICE AGREEMENT r 141085 DIVERSIFIED FASTENING SYSTEMS S457.68 TOOLS 14108E ROBERT F.DRIVER ASSOC. 85,400.W PERSONNEL INSURANCE CONSULTANT 141087 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. 8994.9E PAINT SUPPLIES 141088 D'VALS SALES 8205.94 FITTINGS 141089 ESP NORTH SUITS FITTINGS 141090 ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLING $2,019.01 LAB SUPPLIES 141091 EASTMAN,INC. 85,531.76 OFFICE SUPPLIES 141092 EDWARDS HIGH VACUUM INTER. $76.70 LAB SUPPLIES 141083 ENCHANTER,INC. $5.040.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.S-M92 /4 M ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL SERVICE 8490.00 LAS SUPPLIES 141098 ENVIRONMENTAL PROD.USA $2.067.72 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 141M ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. 8750.50 LAB SERVICES 141D97 EOS INSTITUTE 8100A0 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 141D90 EXETER SOFTWARE 8161.00 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 141090 MARSHALL FAIRRES $78.08 DEFERREDCOMPOISTRIBUTION 1411M FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE 810,64372 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.D.I0.9-91 141101 FARR CO. 8E,792.80 FILTERS 141102 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $740.35 AIR FREIGHT 141103 FILTERUNE CORP. $167.26 PUMP PARTS 141104 FIRSTCHOICE 8121.00 TELEPHONE 141106 FISCHERBPORTERCO. $323.97 INSTRUMENT PARTS 141100 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $80.53 LAB SUPPLIES i FUND NO 9199 - H DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10137194 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER M43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CWMB PAID it/OL90 POSTNO RATE II/0719I WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 141107 FISIONS INSTRUMENTS $333.64 LAB SUPPLIES J41108 FLO-SYSTEMS $2,078.61 PUMP PARTS 141109 FORMA SCIENTIFIC,INC. $61 Toll SERVICEAGREEMENT 141110 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $277.43 PHOTO SUPPLIES 141111 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $876.40 PAINT SUPPLIES 141112 THE FOXBORO CO. 54,439.5E INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 141113 GST.INC. 959.25 COMPUTER PARTS 141114 GTE TELEPHONE OPERATIONS $5.658.00 TELEPHONE LINE RELOCATION DIST3 141115 GARRATT-CALIAHAN COMPANY $349.11 CHEMICALS 141110 GENERAL BINDING CORP. $766.42 PRINTING SUPPLIES 141117 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. 5255.57 ELECTRIC PARTS 141118 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $3,513.64 TELEPHONE SERVICES 141119 GIERLIC"ITCHELL.INC. 520.007.67 MECHANICAL PARTS 141120 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $4,268.81 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 141121 GRASBYS.T.I. $2,81" ENGINE PARTS f71 141122 DGA CONSULTANTS $12,274.W SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.5&94 X 141123 HACHCOMPANY $1,913.01 LAB SUPPLIES 141124 HAESTAD METHODS $295.00 OFFICE EQUIPMENT CO 14110 FREDA HARPER $1,500.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 141126 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $868.68 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 4 V MATCH B KIRK,INC. $6.625.39 ELECTRIC PARTS D 141128 PL HAWN CO,INC. $50.68 FILTERS 141129 HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT S2,003.33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN. W 141130 NILTL INC. $696.49 SMALL HARDWARE 141131 HOERBIGER CVS CALIF.,INC. $4Q4A7 COMPRESSORPARTS 141132 ROME DEPOT $214.39 HARDWARE 141133 RS HUGHES CO.INC. $1,850.03 PAINT SUPPLIES 1411M CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $31.50 WATER USE 141135 ORANGECOLINTYFEDCREDITUNION 5680.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 141136 IMPERIALWESTCHEMICAL 599.W2.18 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.11-1&92 141137 INDUSTRIAL AIR COMPRESSOR $777.32 HARDWARE 141138 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $722.12 CONNECTORS 141139 IRVINEPHOTOGRAPHICS $13.09 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 141140 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $76.42 WATER USE 141141 J.D.I.TECHNOLOGIES,INC. $MT.N SERVICE AGREEMENT 141142 JAMISON ENGINEERING $25,061.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 141143 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY. 51,011.84 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 141144 JAYS CATERING $545.33 DIRECTORS•MEETING EXPENSE 141145 DIMS SUSPENSION SERVICE 52EW TRUCKREPAIRS 141148 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $181.55 ELECTRIC PARTS 141147 JONES INDUSTRIAL HARDWARE CO. $126.0 TOOLS 14114E THE KEITH COMPANIES $1,413,W ENGINEERING SERVICES&38R 141149 KING BEARING,INC. $895.46 MACHINE SUPPLIES 141150 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $5,379.91 INSTRUMENT PARTS 141151 LA LIQUID HANDLING SYSTEMS $15B.11 PUMP PARTS 141152 LAMBDA FLORESCENCE 572.50 LAB SUPPLIES i FUND NO 91M - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1=7/94 PAGE4 MMRTNUMBERAP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 11/02M4 POSTINGDATEIt/OL94 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 141153 LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT L LAVOIE $445.55 LEGAL SERVICES-NR2EN 1411M LAYMAN,JONES 6 DYE,LAWYERS $687.25 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.5-13-92 MISS LEHMAN BROTHERS,INC. S6,301.37 REMARKETING FEE 141166 LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INS.CO. $3,804.79 DEFERRED COMP TRUSTEE 141157 MBC APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL $1.940.00 OCEANMONITORINOM.0.6-I"2 141168 NOT BIOLOGIC COMPANY S477.00 SERVICEAGREEMENT 141159 MPS $33,32 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 141160 MACOMCO $194.32 SERVICEAGREEMENT 141161 MAD SYSTEMS $520.88 ELECTRIC PARTS 141162 MANDATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. E368,840.00 CONSTRUCTION P242.2 141163 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $257.27 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 141IN MEASUREMENTVARIABLES $2.429.43 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 141165 MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. 91,460.40 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 1411M METAL SUPPLY,INC. E1,160.47 METALS 141167 MICROSICS CORPORATION $1655u LAB SUPPLIES rn 141168 MIDWAY MFG.6 MACHINING $8.617.16 MECHANICAL REPAIRS X 14110 MIGHTYMOVERTRAILERS $2.020.53 TRAILER ti 1411M MISCO E1,954.09 INSTRUMENTSUPPLIES DD 141171 MISSION INDUSTRIES E3,529.37 UNIFORM RENTALS -4 141172 PAUL MONROE '107.02 ENGINE PARTS 141173 MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES S2,550.00 LAB SERVICES y 141174 MORTON SALT S484.68 SALT 1 141175 MOTION INDUSTRIES,INC. 51,W8A4 HARDWARE 'C 14H76 NATIONALRESEARCHCOUN-CANADA $279.W SUBSCRIPTION 141177 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $981.20 PLUMBINGSUPPLIES 141170 NELSON40UNN,INC. E750.32 VALVE PARTS 141179 NETWORKOENERAL $22,289,38 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 141160 NEUTRON S9.906.70 CHEMICALS 141161 BY NIELSON SERVICE,INC. $765A0 SERVICE AGREEMENT 141162 NUSONICS DIVIMESA LABS $2,218.19 INSTRUMENT PARTS 14110 OFFICE PAVIUONSBNTERIOR RESOURCES $1,776.88 OFFICE FURNITURE 141184 THE OHMART CORP. E975.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 141185 ORANGECOUNTYAUTOPARTSCO. E2W.68 TRUCK PARTS 1411M ORANGE COONTYW410LESALE $3,789.69 ELECTRICSUPPLIES 141101 ORANGECOURIER E133S5 COURIER SERVICES 1411M ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. $284.86 FITTINGS 141189 OXYGEN SERVICE $6,529.85 SPECIALTY GASES 141190 COUNTYOFORANGE SS.M.31 SERVICE AGREEMENT 10191 PACIFIC PARTS $15,161.90 INSTRUMENT PARTS 141192 PACIFIC BELL $173.85 TELEPHONE SERVICES 141193 PACTEL MERIDLAN SYSTEMS $300.0 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS 141194 PARAGON CABLE S38.78 CABLE SERVICES 141195 PARKSON CORPORATION E25,756.38 PLUMBING PARTS 1411M PARTS UNLIMITED $1,493.70 TRUCK PARTS 141197 PASCAL 6 LUDWIG.INC. $241,211.52 CONSTRUCTIONPI-38-2 141198 PASCALANDLUDWIG 3149,127.30 CONSTRUCTION P243.1 \F i FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE =7A14 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 1IA72J94 POSTING DATE 11M294 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 141199 PATTEN CORPITAYLOR INSTR. E852.73 STRIP CHARTS 141200 KPMO PEAT MARWICK CPA S2,834.00 AUDITING SERVICES M.O.5-11-94 141201 PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION $1,555m LAB SUPPLIES 1412M PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION $146.70 LAB SUPPLIES 141203 PIMA ORO SYSTEMS,INC. 3142,538.20 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.5.&91 141204 PITNEY BONES f2N.74 POSTAGE MACHINE SERVICE AGREEMENT 141205 POLY ENTERPRISES E]01.70 SAFETY SUPPLIES 1412M POLYMETRICS,INC. $1.262.75 SERVICE AGREEMENT 141207 RHONE POULENE $24.574.76 CHEMICALS 141208 POWER TRACK,INC. $67.05 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.&11.92 141209 PRESENTATION PRODUCTS $711.39 OFFICE SUPPLIES 141210 HAROLO PRIMROSE ICE $911.00 ICE 141211 PROCESS EQUIPMENT COMPANY $3,522.17 PUMP PARTS 141212 PUBLIC FINANCIAL MGMT.,INC. $3,759.66 FINANCIAL CONSULTING SERVICES M.0.6844 m 141213 PULSAFEEDER E1740A1 PUMP PARTS X 14 214 R B R INSTRUMENTS f216.04 ELECTRIC PARTS 2 141215 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO. E2130.13 LAB SUPPLIES 141216 RAYCOM SYSTEMS,INC. $42.119.56 FIBRE OPTIC M.0.12-&93 CO 141217 REDWNGSHOES f730.12 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES -1 141218 MICHAEL G.REIDELER $18.71 INSURANCE REIMBURSEMENT 141219 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLICSUPPLY $716.10 PLUMBING SUPPLIES n 141220 REWES ENGINEERING CO. $1,577.38 BUILDING MATERIALS 1 141ZH RUSH ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES $450.0) ENGINEERING SERVICES 141223 S.B.E. E158.35 ENGINDOUSEERING SERVICES ASTE TAX 141224 SANTA FEINDUSTRING,INC. f1,$78,06 PLUMBING SUPPLIES SERVICES 141225 SAWS R INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS 978.08 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 141226 SAW SERVICEOFAMERICA,INC. ,287.62 TOOLS 141227 SCIENCE APPLICATIONSf$13,40.15 OCEAN MONITORING PERSONNEL 141226 SR.CRAIGCOTT SPECIALTY SCOTT ASSOC.ES, f13,480.15 LEGAL SERVICES-PERSONNEL ISSUES 141229 SEA COAST DESIGNS GASES,INC. E$".50 SPECIATOOLS TV GASES 141230 SEA COAST DESIGNS $34.50 TOOLS 141MI SEARS SERVICE CENTER f84.50 TRUCK PARTS 141232 SHAMROCK URELUC SALESUPPLY $5,068.85 TOOLS 141233 SH CALIF. DISON $95$11,424.31 ENGINE PARTS 141234 SO CALIF. AS.00.CO. 595,434.51 POWER 141234 SOUVENIR GAS. f10$183.49 RATURALGAS 141235 SOUVENIR PHOTO E089.74 WELDING SUPPLIES 141237 WESTALLOY,INC. $1,$47.88 WELDING SUPPLIES 1412M SPECIALIZED PRODUCTS INC. CO. f47.88 OFFICE SUPPLIES 141230 SPIR INDUSTRIES,INC. $639.06 LAB SUPPLIES 141240 SPIRE BOARTECHNOLOGIESFEQUSYSDN. $235.08 COMPUTER OUSOFTWARE WASTE LICENCE 141241 STATE BOARD OF EOUALIIATION E$24.77 OFFICE US WASTE TAX 141242 STERLING ART 529.77 SUBSCRIPTION IPTIONSUPPLIES 141243 STEVENS PUBLISHING CORP. E519.30 SUBSCRIPTION 1412" GRY G. f368.91 LAB SUPPLIES 1112M GARY O.STREED $5.388.81 REIMB.PETTY CASH.TRAININOBTRAVEL FUNDNO 910 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE IQQ7180 PACES REP0RTNUMBERAP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CAIMSPAID11AI2 POSTIN0DATEII)OVIM WARRANT NO. VENDOR 101245 SUMMITSTEEL 8850.00 METAL 141246 SUNSET FORD $251.22 TRUCK PARTS 10247 SUPELCO,INC. $817.28 LAB SUPPLIES 141248 SUPER CHEM CORP. $379.08 CHEMICALS 141249 SUPER POWER PRODUCTS $155.16 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 141250 TCH ASSOCIATES 58N1.00 LAB SUPPLIES 141251 TALENT TREE PERSONNEL SERVICES $3.016.74 TEMPORARY PERSONNEL 141252 TEKDRAULICS ST80.00 MECHANICAL PARTS 141253 THERMO JARRELLASH CORP. $122.701.53 LAB EQUIPMENT M.O.B-&94 141254 THOMAS FISH CO. $10.25 LAB SUPPLIES 14120 TIGER DIRECT 8309.85 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 1412M TOLEDO SCALE CORP. $490.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 141257 TONYS LOCK 0 SAFE SERVICE $465.0 LOCKS&KEYS 141258 TRANE $1.105.12 ELECTRIC PARTS T>7 141259 THE TRANE COMPANY $2,284.30 ELECTRIC PARTS X 141280 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES $4,707.00 TRAVEL SERVICES M.O.&&S4 2 141MI TREBOR ELECTRONICS 51,022.17 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 141292 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. 8044.31 TRUCK PARTS W 141263 TRUESDAIL LABS $3,041.10 LAB SERVICES —1 14120a JG TUCKER 6 S0N.INC. 5551.14 INSTRUMENTPARTS D 141265 TWINING LABORATORIES $14.148.42 SOIL TESTING M.0.7.11M 1 141266 USASCIENTIRCPLASTICS $176.24 LASSUPPLIES LT3 141267 U.S.C.SPONSORED PROJECTS ACCT. $680.28 TECHNICAL SERVICES 141288 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $717.00 LAB SUPPLIES 141269 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $563.67 PARCEL SERVICES 141270 VWR SCIENTIFIC $1,694.35 LAB SUPPLIES 141271 VALINCORPORATION $110.83 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 141272 VALLEY CRIES SUPPLY CO. $3,041.01 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 141273 VANIER BUSINESS FORMS $568.67 OFFICE SUPPLIES 141274 VERTEX SYSTEMS $722.50 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT 141275 VILLAGE NURSERIES $457A2 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 141276 VORTEX INDUSTRIES $39420 BUILDING REPAIRS 141277 VULCAN PEROXIDATION SYSTEMS $7.058,69 CHEMICALSM.0.19-N 141278 CARL WARREN B CO. $544.57 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR 141279 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY 530,085.62 CAUSTIC SODA S HYPOCHLORIDE M.0.8-f2-92 A 44&94 141280 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $96.98 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 102B1 WESCO $2,973.80 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 141282 WITEG $600.47 LAB SUPPLIES 141283 ROURKE,WOODRUFF B SPRADLIN $37.421.01 LEGAL SERVICES M.02-19-92 141284 XEROX CORP. $5.820.67 COPIER LEASES 141285 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. 83W.41 LAB SUPPLIES 141286 JOHNSON YOKOGAWA CORP. $471.75 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 41287 RICHARD YOUNG PRODUCTS $927.72 PRINTING SUPPLIES 1412M RICHARD B.EDGAR 5200.W DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION T0TAL CLAIMS PAID 11IO2/90 /\/ 53,292.M7.M FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE ID2TM4 PAGE T REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLMMSPAIDII/0]94 POSRNGDATEIIAT2N4 SUMMARY AMOUNT 01 OPER FUND 1,415.00 020PER FUND 3,229.20 02 CAP FAD FUND 336,7T3.20 RI OPER FUND 3?,S73AI 03 CAP FAD FUND 47.435.71 05 OPER FUND 33.433.63 05 CAP FAD FUND 450.00 07 OPER FUND 4,601.57 A CAP FAC FUND 11,404.60 011 0MR FUND 14,572.17 011 CAP FAD FUND 357.18 014 OPER FUND 106.37 rn X 014 CAP FAD FUND T,BW.64 f566 OPER FUND 2.426.60 0566 CAP FAD FUND 28.62 bO NV FUND $2.1164.51 fT614 OPER FUND 4,73434 A OPER FUND 976,192.97 D co" 1,6W,155.50 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND f15,1413.56 V JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL f184,933.95 f3,292,MT.]4 FUND NO 91W - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PRCCESSINGDATE 11N9194 PAGE1 REPORTNUMBERAP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 11H6M POSTING DATE I I118194 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 141318 AS TECH COMPANY S10,027.90 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-991 141319 ATM AA,INC. $9,590.79 LAB SERVICES 14132D AT&T-MEGACOM SERVICE $4J72.13 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 141321 ADVANCED ENGINE TECH CORP. $6,324.04 MONITORING SYST.FEASIBILITY STUDY 141322 ALLIED REFRIGERATION $115.89 ELECTRIC PARTS 141M3 ALLIED SUPPLY CO. 5493.50 INSTRUMENT 141324 ALLOSEP $177.70 LAB SUPPLIES 141325 AMELCOCONSTRUCTION S7,234AI CONSTRUCTION P2-531 141328 AMERICAN BANKER NEWSLETTER $59500 SUBSCRIPTION 141327 AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $619.73 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 141MS ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION $1.065.30 SEWER REPAIRS 141N9 ANDREWS GLASS CO. S727.0T LAB SUPPLIES 141330 ANGELSCIENTIFICPRODUCTS S487.72 LAB SUPPLIES 141MI ANIXTER-OISTRIBUTION 51,194A6 OFFICE EQUIPMENT fT1 141332 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL $135.00 SERVICEAGREEMENT 1413M APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS,INC. $310.50 LAB SUPPLIES = 1413M ACS(APPUED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $1.531.52 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 1413M ASSURYENVIRONMENTALSERV. 535.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL 141336 ASSOCIATED VACUUM TECH,INC. S713.13 COMPRESSOR PARTS 141337 AMSA 514,642.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES 1413M RANDOLPH AUSTIN CO. $634.69 FITTINGS 010 141339 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $3,678.67 PAYROLL SERVICES HIM BRW SAFETY&SUPPLY $378.69 SAFETY SUPPLIES 141NI BATTERY SPECIALTIES $1,2N.46 BATTERIES ` 141N2 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. ".W.60 LAB SUPPLIES 141M3 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $517.90 TRUCKWASHTICKETS 141W BELL SECURITY $8,015.50 SECURITY SERVICES 141MS SEW ENGINEERING,INC. $1,4".53 COMPRESSOR PARTS 141346 BERG POKIER ENGINEERS,INC. $5,980.00 ELECTRICALSERVICES 141N7 BID TECH NET,INC. 34.98 SERVICE AGREEMENTS 141M8 BONA-RUES $212,33 TRUCK PARTS 141349 SORNEMANN PUMPS.INC. $1,326.20 PUMP PARTS 141M BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. 538,875.12 ENGINEERING SERVICES P141 1413511 BREZZER CONSTRUCTION $918.12 TOOLS 141M BRENNER-FIEDLER&ASSOC,INC. S575.08 COMPRESSOR PARTS 141M BID BOOKS $1,755.10 PUBUCATION 141354 THE BUREAUOF NATICNALAFFAIRS $2.033.24 PUBLICATIONS 141355 BURKE ENGINEERING 00. S1,U59.33 ELECTRICSUPPLIES 141356 BUSINESS NEWS PUBLISHING $59.00 SUBSCRIPTION 141357 BUYCHEM DISTRIBUTORS 5368.51 JANITORIAL SERVICES 141358 CS COMPANY $5.754.81 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 141359 CWPCA FILM FESTIVAL S75.00 REGISTRATION FEES 1413M CALTROL,INC. $1,424.99 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 141361 CAUFORNIAAUTO COLLISION,INC. E494.12 TRUCK PARTS 141362 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $0.493.07 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-38 141363 CASHCO 5881.31 VALVES PUNONO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE IIKSIB4 PAGE2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 1 VISAM POSTING DATE 11I16A14 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 141384 CENTURY SAFETY INST.5 SUPPLY $1,799.94 SAFETY SUPPLIES 141365 CLARK CONSULTANTS $2,080A0 ELECTRICAL CONSULTING 141MS COUCH AND SONS $2,200.00 CONSTRUCTION"7d MINT COUCH S SONS $231.024.15 CONSTRUCTION 2-9411 141US JANICE MC NALLY 54 &W EMPLOYEETRAINING 141369 CONNEL GM PARTS I DIV. $132.71 TRUCK PARTS 1413M CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC. $10.48 TOOLS 141NI COOPER INDUSTRIES,INC. 82,982.01 ENGINE PARTS 141372 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $532.30 TRUCK PARTS 141373 COUNTERPART ENTERPRISES 5WAS FITTINGS 141374 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC SM3.n ELECTRIC PARTS 141375 T.H.CREEARS CORP. $410.55 VALVES 1413M STATE OF CALIFORNIA $7,919.00 STATE UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 1413" SWRCIUAFRS $10,400.00 ANNUALWASTE DISCHARGE FEES 141378 SWRCBISW FEES 52W.00 ANNUAL WASTE DISCHARGE FEES .X 141379 ONE.INC. $4.10.79 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 1413M J.W.DANGELO CO.,INC. 5256.45 PLUMBING SUPPLIES r=I 141MI DECUS 54,024.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION l'z1 141N2 DELTA FOAM PRODUCTS $138.20 LAS SUPPLIES 141303 DEZURICKANDIORCSCO. $1.617.11 VALVES 1413M DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $2,823.03 SERVICE AGREEMENTS DD 141355 DISPOSABLE WASTE SYS. $5,881.76 MECHANICAL PARTS 1 1413M DIVERSIFIED FASTENING SYSTEMS $40.92 SMALL TOOLS 141357 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $940.00 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 141388 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $1.646.23 PAINT SUPPLIES 141359 DURKEE TESTING $109.87 LAB SERVICES 14139D ESP NORTH 5194.16 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 141391 EASTMAN,INC. $4.408.05 OFFICE SUPPLIES 141392 EBERHARD EQUIPMENT 5228.42 TRUCK PARTS 141393 ECOANALYSIS,INC. $2,308.68 CONSULTING SERVICES 141M ELSEVIER SCIENCE PUBLISHING 549&W SUBSCRIPTION 141395 ENCHANTER,INC. 115.61 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.8-1492 1413M FISCHER S PORTER CO. 51,140.64 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 141397 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 00. $59.10 LAB SUPPLIES 141398 FISIONS INSTRUMENTS M." LAB SUPPLIES 141388 FLO-SYSTEMS $1.212.84 PUMP PARTS 1414W FORMA SCIENTIFIC,INC. $335.00 SERVICEAGREEMENT 141401 FOUNTAINVALUEYCAMERA $63.35 PHOTO SUPPLIES 141402 TREFOKBOROCO. $2,486.22 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 141403 FRANKLIN QUEST CO. $IM.42 OFFICE SUPPLIES 141404 GST,INC. $15,226.08 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 141405 GTE CALIFORNIA.INC. $1,900.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 141406 GAUGE REPAIR SERVICE $1,704.11 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS 141407 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $827.49 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 1414M GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1,994.23 TELEPHONE SERVICES 1414M GRAPHIC CONTROLS SUN INSTRUMENT PARTS FUNDNO BIN - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 11109194 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMSPAIDIVISMI POSTINGDATEIIHBAM WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 141410 GRASSY S.T.I. $231.50 ENGINE PARTS 141411 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. 1267.66 HARDWARE 141412 HACH COMPANY $360.58 LAB SUPPLIES 141413 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $1.110.41 PLUM81NO SUPPLIES 141414 WITCH B KIRK,INC. 355.69 TRUCK PARTS 141415 HAUSER ENGINEERING $4.220.83 LAB SERVICES 141416 HERMAN MILLER.INC. $3,481.68 OFFICE FURNITURE 141417 HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT $2.083.33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN. 141418 HEWLETT PACKARD 11,470.00 SERVICEAGREEMENT 141419 HILTI,INC. 5290.45 BATTERY 141420 RC HOFFMAN ANDIOR ISCO 810,276.N METERS 141421 HOWES B NARVER.INC. $62.413.77 ENGINEERING SERVICES P2.53 1414M HOME DEPOT 12WA2 HARDWARE 141423 RS HUGHES CO.INC. 11,381.11 PAINTSUPPUES 141424 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $19,267.50 WATER USE TTT 141425 HUNTINGDON ENO.B ENVIROW 12,925.00 VOC VAPOR STUDY X 141426 HYCLONE LABORATORIES.INC. $1,080." LAB SUPPLIES .Z. 141427 IDEXX $652.63 LAB SUPPLIES W 141428 IPCO SAFETY CIO PACIFIC SAFETY $1,050.51 SAFETY SUPPLIES 141429 ISCO.INC. 1101.58 INSTRUMENT 1414M IDEA MAN,INC. $1.737.01 RIDESHARE PROMOTIONS Lb 141431 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL 170.224.04 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11.18-92 I 141432 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $249.40 CONNECTORS W 1H433 INGRAM PAPER $488.58 OFFICE SUPPLIES 141434 INLANDEMPIREEOUIPMENTCO. $99.53 TRUCK PARTS 141435 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS 11,154.05 BATTERIES 141430 IRVINE RANCHWATER DISTRICT $138.36 WATER USE 141437 32 PRINTING SERVICES $92.13 PRINTING 141436 JAMISON ENGINEERING $5,013A/ CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 141439 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY. $1,010.97 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 141440 JAY'S CATERING $175.00 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE 141441 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 12.434AB ELECTRIC PARTS 141"2 KALLEENS COMPUTER PRODUCTS $373.07 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 141443 KELLY SERVICES 51,287.20 TEMPORARY PERSONNEL SERVICES 1414 KING BEARING,INC. $451.12 MACHINE SUPPLIES 141MS KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $4.642.16 TOOLS 141446 LAIDLAW ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES $9.145.12 HAZARDOUS WASTE REMOVAL 141447 LAMSON CORPORATION $ISB.N HARDWARE 141MS LAWICRANDAL,INC. $1,450.00 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.743394 141449 LEGI-TECH 1320.W COMPUTER SERVICES 141450 LEE B RO CONSULTING ENOR. 173,Z27.84 ENGINEERING SERVICES PIJGI 141451 MACOMCO 1790.76 SERVICEAGREEMENT 1414W MAO TITAN,INC. 11,600.75 TRUCK REPAIRS 14140 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $62.77 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 1414U MATT-CHLOR,INC. $1.023.07 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 14140 MCKENNA ENOR.B EQUIP. WWI? PUMPPARTS C FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 1II(I PAGE4 REPORTNUMBERAP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMSPAIDIIIHIS4 POSTWGDATE1UI1 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 141458 MCWELCO RACK-N-BOX CO. $52851 TRUCK PARTS 141457 MICROBICS CORPORATION 1701134 CHEMICALS 141458 MIDWAY MFG.B MACHINING 12,02888 MACHINE SUPPLIES 141459 MISCO S93S90 MACHINE SUPPLIES 141460 MISSION INDUSTRIES $2,495.90 UNIFORM RENTALS 141451 MLADEN BUNRCH CONSTRUCTION 5839,89580 CONSTRUCTION 14-1-1A 141462 MOBILE HOSE AND HYDRAULIC $03.21 PUMP PARTS 141453 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES,INC. $2,50D.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 1414N REAL SUPPLY CO. $2.385.14 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 141465 NEUTRON 58,921.38 CHEMICALS 141488 NEW HORIZONS COMPUTER CENTER $1,899.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 1441467 CRY OF NEWPORT BEACH $02.98 WATER USE 141400 NORGREN $154.83 INSTRUMENT PARTS 141469 NORTH AMERICAN VAN LINES $2,SD2.40 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT m 141470 ORACLE EDUCATION CENTER $1,7S0.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION x 141471 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. $178.59 TRUCK PARTS = 144472 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO. 51,085.37 CHEMICALS L1473 ORANGE COUNTY FARM SUPPLYCO. $197.79 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES ll1 1474 ORANGE COUNTY INDUSTRIAL $255.07 ELECTRIC PARTS __4 141475 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $1,983." ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 141476 ORANGE COURIER 5133.85 COURIER SERVICES .DD 1414" ORANGE VALVE B FITTING CO. $1,79415 FITTINGS 1 141479 OXYGEN SERVICE $3.498.45 SPECIALTY CASES 141479 COUNTY OF ORANGE 525.00 NOTICE OF COMPLETION J,4l 141480 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT 583,720.00 GAP WATER USE M.O.&693 141481 PGO SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION $118,65 LAB SUPPLIES 141482 PNS ENTERPRISES $21DA4 ENGINEERING SUPPLIES 141483 PSSI $1.437.50 SEWERVIDEOINSPECTION 1414M PACCO SALES $205.90 PAINT SUPPLIES 141485 IPCO SAFETY $5.246.39 SAFETY SUPPLIES 141480 PACIFIC WATER CONDITIONING CO. $28BOD EQUIPMENT RENTALS 141487 PACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS 5484.87 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS 141489 PAGENET $1,093.95 RENTALEGUIPMENT 141489 PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION $9w.50 LAB SUPPLIES 141490 PHYSICIANS DESK REFERENCE 559.90 PUBLICATION 141491 PIERCE CHEMICAL COMPANY 15400 LAB SUPPLIES 141492 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS.INC. $140,740.80 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O."91 I41493 POLYSPEDE $68.79 ELECTRIC PARTS 141494 POSTAGE BY PHONE $5000 00 POSTAGE 14140 POST CONSUMER PRODUCTS $1,015.38 PROMOTIONAL ITEMS 141409 PRIMAX ELECTRONICS $75.43 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 141497 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $213,35 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS 1414N RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $1.715,43 TRASH REMOVAL 141499 RAINININSTRUMENTCO. $818.20 UBSUPPLIES 1415M REISH MARINE STUDIES,INC. 11,3000p OCEAN MONITORING 141501 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $8.72953 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 1 FUNDHO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 11I09R4 PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 11116AM POSTING OATS 11/16194 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 141502 ROYCE PRODUCTIONS $2.350.00 MDEOTAPEPRODUCTION 141503 RYAN-NERCO $597.90 PUMP PARTS 141504 SANTA AM ELECTRIC MOTORS $1,484.97 ELECTRIC PARTS 141505 SAWA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $932.60 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 141506 SANWA BANK $70,988.20 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION 14-14A 14150T R.CRAIG SCOTT B ASS= $9,316.03 LEGAL SERVICES-PERSONNEL ISSUES 141508 SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS,INC. $1,25121 LAB SUPPLIES 141509 CITY OF SEAL BEACH SN6.10 WATER USE 141510 SEAL BLACK $0.69 OIL 141511 SENSUS TECHNOLOGIES 5563.60 METER 141512 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $1,3D7.45 ELECTRIC PARTS 141513 SHURELUCK SALES $6,609.82 TOGLSABIRDWARE 141514 SIEVERS INSTRUMENTATION 5795.00 LAB SUPPLIES 141515 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC 8219.81 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 141516 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP. SSIA2 TOOLS X10517 SOCOASTAIROUALITY 511,634J1 PERMIT FEES = 14151B SOUTHCOASTWATER $36AD LAB SUPPLIES 141519 $0.CAL.GAS.CO. W.357DB NATURAL GAS I" 1415M SO.CALIF.WATER CO. $67.09 WATER USE 141521 SOUTHERNCOUNTIESOILCO. $16,532.53 DIESEWNLEADED FUEL 141522 STAMEN Z.SPASSOFF P.E. $500.01) ENGINEERING SERVICES J49-2 ISJ 141523 SPIRE TECHNOLOGIES SYS.DIV. $1,642.19 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 1 141U4 SPYGLASS.INC. $525.00 COMPUTERSOFTWARE 141525 STARTEK INTERNATIONAL SB87.00 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT 141526 GARY 0.STREED $8'%0.26 REIMS.PETTY CASH,TRAINING 8 TRAVEL 141527 SUNSET FORD $558A4 TRUCK PARTS 141520 SUPELCO.INC. $14221 LAB SUPPLIES 141529 TALENT TREE PERSONNEL SERVICES $1,375.38 TEMPORARY PERSONNEL 141530 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $223,10 ELECTRIC CART PARTS M531 CHARLES E.THOMAS $1,161.9D TRUCK PARTS 141632 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $69794 MECHANICALPARTS 141533 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES 5984.50 TRAVEL SERVICES M.O".94 141534 TROPICAL PVSA NURSERY,INC. $17,405.84 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.0.5-11-94 14105 MUCK 8 AUTO SUPPLY,INC. 520.34 TRUCK PARTS 141536 TRUESDAIL LABS $2,981.14 LAB SERVICES 14107 JO TUCKER B SON,INC. $602.73 INSTRUMENTPARTS 141538 TUSTIN DODGE $18.19 TRUCK PARTS 141539 U.S.AUTO GLASS CENTERS $231.06 TRUCK PARTS 141640 U.S.C.SPONSORED PROJECTS ACCT. $2.318.74 TECHNICAL SERVICES 141MI UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 5410.11 PARCEL SERVICES 141S12 VWR SCIENTIFIC $1.442.65 LAB SUPPLIES 141643 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $356.26 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 141544 VALLEY DETROIT DIESEL $305.79 DIESEL ENGINE PARTS 141545 VANIER BUSINESS FORMS $46.08 OFFICE SUPPLIES 141546 VERNE'S PLUMBING 81,161.77 PLUMBING SERVICES 141M7 VILLAGE NURSERIES 5257.51 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES FUNDNO 9199 JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 11109194 PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID IUUI94 POSTING DATE 11116M WARRANT NO. VENDOR 141548 SKIPWESTCOTT $247.39 ENGINEERING SERVICES 141549 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $26,145.61 CAUSTIC SODA B HYPOCHLORIDE M.O.6-12-9284-1194 141550 WEST4.TTE SUPPLY CO. $131,37 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 141551 WESTMARINE $353.15 SAFETY SUPPUES 141552 WITEG S761.26 LAS SUPPLIES 141553 XEROX CORP. $1.765.38 COPIER LEASES 141554 RICHARD YOUNG PRODUCTS $370,73 INSTRUMENT PARTS TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 09ID7194 51,967,870.54 SUMMARY AMOUNT rn 02 CAP FAD FUND 231,024.15 X 03 OPER FUND 19.450.36 S3 CAP FAC FUND 4,220.93 l32 05 OPER FUND 4,165.66 �--1 S9 OPER FUND 53.89 07 OPER FUND 1,910.88 WI fill OPER FUND 1,900.00 011 CAP FAC FUND 9,27 014 OPER FUND 96.77 014 CAP FAC FUND 711,888.08 03511 OPER FUND 2.50040 4598 OPER FUND 255,07 0569 CAP FAC FUND 2.200 00 07814 OPER FUND 691.17 JT OPER FUND 575.314.85 CORE 267,761]4 SELFFUNDED INSURANCE FUND 2.083.33 JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL 142.532.48 51,967.B7054 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1 U22O84 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID I IQG 94 POSTMO DATE 11I30194 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 141578 AG TECH COMPANY $119,182.84 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-&91 141579 A.O.TECH $400.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 1415N AT&T-MEGACOMSERVICE $971.48 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 141581 AT&T-PROWATTS 5827.50 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 141582 ADAMSON INDUSTRIES $1,151.57 LAB SUPPLIES 141503 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS,INC. $1,046,486.08 CONSTRUCTION PIJ&1 1415M AIR COLD SUPPLY,INC. f91.01 AIR CONDITIONER PARTS 141585 AIR PRODUCTS B CHEMICALS,INC. $17,788.OD O&M AGREEMENT OKY GEN.SYST.M.O.&94I9 141586 ALTA-ROBBINS $10.70 INSTRUMENTPARTS 141587 AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $621.58 SOLVENTS 141588 ANI%TER-DISTRIBURON 542.92 OFFICE REPAIRS 141589 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $5.614,86 NOTICES&ADS 141590 AGS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLURON) $1,593.89 COMMUNICATION PARTS 141591 ABC LABORATORIES $2.115.00 LAB SUPPLIES m 141592 ARENS INDUSTRIES,INC. 0672.66 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES X 141593 AR12ONA INSTRUMENT $439.74 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 2 1415" ARMOR-VAC $300.00 VACUUMTRUCKSERVICE 141595 ASSOCIATED LABORATORIES 9400.W LAB SERVICES 14150 ATKIWJONES COMPUTER SERVICE $321.W SERVICE AGREEMENT 141597 AVNETCOMPUTER $7,738.PJ OFFICE EQUIPMENT n 141598 BKKLANDFILL $8,062.85 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91 141599 BRW SAFETY&SUPPLY $1.453.53 SAFETY SUPPLIES 141M BANANA BLUEPRINT 54,511.31 PRINTING M.O.1&10-90 141MI BATTERY SPECIALTIES 3264,46 BATTERIES 141602 BAITER DIAGNOSTICS.INC. SO,355.57 LAB SUPPLIES 141W3 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. 5159.90 TRUCKWASHTICKETS 141604 BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS $60.61 LAB EQUIPMENT 141NS BELLSECURNY $1.384.70 SECURITYSERVICES 141606 BIO�RAD LABORATORIES $124.61 LAB SUPPLIES MINT BIOSAFETY SYSTEM, $11045 LAB SUPPLIES 141608 BID VENTURES,INC. $162.00 LAB SUPPLIES 141609 BLASIUS ELECTRIC TRUCK,INC. $262.61 TRUCK PARTS 141610 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. 314,051.W ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-7-1 141611 BRENNER-FIEDLER&ASSOC.,INC. $207.53 COMPRESSOR PARTS 141612 BUDGET JANITORIAL $3,515.00 JANITORIAL SERVICES 141613 BW BOOKS 5340.56 TECHNICAL MANUALS 141614 THE BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFFAIRS S388B0 SUBSCRIPTION 141615 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. S353.20 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 141618 BUSH&ASSOCIATES,INC. $6,172.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6&94 141617 BUYCHEM DISTRIBUTORS S4.070.26 JANITORIAL SERVICES 141818 CEM CORPORATION S%6.28 LAB SUPPLIES 141619 CH2M HILL 522,798M ENGINEERING SERVICES J-31 141620 C.L TECHNOLOGY I720.00 GAS ANALYSIS SERVICES 141621 C M I 51,869.25 INSTRUMENT PARTS 141622 CABLES TO GO $330.14 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 141623 CALTROL,INC. 3785.95 INSTRUMENT FUND NO SIN - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 1V22/94 PAGE2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 117.TOR4 POSTING DATE 11MOrW WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 141624 IOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS 52,196.60 ENGINEERING SERVICES iM 141M CASHCO $316.21 VALVE PARTS 141M CENTURY SAFETY INST.6 SUPPLY 52.137.39 SAFETY SUPPLIES 141627 CERFNET E12021 COMPUTER SERVICES 141626 CLARITY ELECTRONICS LTD $3,410.00 VIDEO EQUIPMENT 141629 COMPUSA,INC. $46.62 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 141630 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST f785AI ELECTRIC PARTS 141631 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC. $476.14 TOOLS 1416V CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO. E2,6W.16 CHLORINE M.0.100.11.93 14103 CONTROLCO f129.02 ELECTRIC PARTS 141834 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS O C $12,6W.38 CONSULTING SERVICES M.O8-11-93 141635 COOPER INDUSTRIES.INC. 51.992AI ENGINE PARTS 141M COOPER INDUSTRIES ANDATTY 52,889.40 J-19-2 CLAIM FEES 141637 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $1,166.71 ELECTRIC PARTS f1T 141635 CHARLES P.CROWLEY CO. $1.60,75 INSTRUMENT PARTS X I41639 OFFICE OF SELF-INS PLANS 5356.84 FEES x 141MO ONE,INC. f2,149.00 ENGINE PARTS 141641 J.W.D'ANGELO CO.,INC. $5,947.69 PLUMBING SUPPLIES to 141642 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIF. 08.614.74 DENTAL INSURANCE PLAN —1 141613 DIETERICH-POST CO. 5184.04 INSTRUMENT PARTS 141W DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $26,671.74 TRAINING REGISTRATIONISERV.AGREE. n 141NS DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $265.12 PAINTSUPPLIES I 141W EGA(ENGINEERING DESIGN AUTO) 51,531.18 SERVICEAGREEMENT N 141847 ESP NORTH E201.49 FITTINGS 14161E EASTMAN,INC. $4,797.28 OFFICE SUPPLIES 141M EDUCATIY515,INC. f2,DW.00 CONSULTING SERVICES MININGREGISMTIO 14101 EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT SPEC f7,000.00 OCEAHMONITOTRATION 14102 ENCHANTER,INC. f5,040.00 OCEAN MONRORING M.O.B-10.92 141652 EDO INSTRUMENTS E61O.55 HARDWARE 141653 ENVIRONMENTAL PROD.USARESOURCE f2,060.50 LAS SERVICES SUPPLIES 141655 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $750.50 LAB SERVICES 14160 IDUDEFLUID ELECTRONICS 58,295.00 BATTERIES 141655 FLUIDTE A DGRASALES f2,665.83 ELECTRSUPPLIES 141657 FST SANG AND GRAVEL,INC. E$78.09 ROAD BASE MATERIALS 14109 FARZIHALL CONDIFAIRRES 652.70 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 1416W FEDERAL DISPOSAL SERVICE E12,852]e RESIDUALS REMOVALM0.10.491 141660 FEDERAL CO.CORP. f855.67 AIR FREIGHT 141661 FIRST CHOICE O. .452.44 COMMUNICATIONS OMMECHANICALICATIO S E 141653 FIRST CHOICE $$156.00 CNITORIL SUPPSESUIPMENT 141661 FIRST COMPANY f156.41 CHLORINATION SUPES PLIES 14161M FISCHER 8 PORTER CO. f$736.55 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 141666 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 5738.58 US SUPPLIES CONFERENCE 141668 KC.SFISIONS INSTRUMENTS ,256.14 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 141667 FLO-SYSTEMS f19Z56.14 MECHANICAL 141M CITY OF DAFORN VA 5750.00 SURVEYING SERVICESMO.B-4B4 111B89 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY f16,082.18 WATER USE FUND NO SIN - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 11QN94 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER M43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 11/30194 POSTING DATE 114301S$ WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 141610 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $1,148.02 PAINT SUPPLIES 141671 FREEDOM IMAGING E132.86 SERVICE AGREEMENT 141872 GST,INC. 55,889.89 COMPUTER PARTS 141073 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $910.31 ELECTRIC PARTS 141614 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $3,480,70 TELEPHONE SERVICES 141675 OIERUCH-MITCHELL,INC. E296.15 PUMP PARTS 141676 GOLDEN COAST SAWDUST PROD. $049.50 SAWDUST 141677 GOVERNMENT INSTITUTES.INC. $310.W BOOKS 14167E DGA CONSULTANTS S12,354.00 SURVEYING SERVICES 11&0.6d94 141679 DAVID R.GRIFFIN 3YIg085.01 LEGAL SERVICES-TECHITE PIPE WO.S-14.94 141650 HACH COMPANY $79.01 LAB SUPPLIES 141MI HARBOUR ENGINEERING $15,918.83 PUMP PARTS 141682 FREDA HARPER $1,500.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 141683 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $2,720.21 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 141884 HAULAWAYCONTAINERS $1,925.00 CONTAINER RENTALS I 141685 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $631.12 PAINT SUPPLIES Z 1416H CITYOF HUNTINGTON BEACH $5.353.25 SLATER AVE,PUMP STN.MODIF. 141587 ORANGE COUNTY FED.CREDIT UNION 5880.00 OEFERREDCOMPDISTRIBUTION 41688 IDP $1,507.95 OFFICE SUPPLIES 141689 INTO INDUSTRIES $115.49 INSTRUMENT PARTS 141NO IPCO SAFETY DID PACIFIC SAFETY $608.93 SAFETY SUPPLIES 0l 141691 ISCO,INC. $348.92 INSTRUMENT PARTS 1416W IMPERULW STCHEMICAL $78,209.77 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.11-18.92 W 141683 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $767.73 CONNECTORS MISS JAMISON ENGINEERING $3.470.20 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 141695 GREATWESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY. $2.628,03 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 141696 JAYS CATERING $367.54 DIRECTORS'MEETING EKPENSE 141697 JONES INDUSTRIAL HARDWARE CO. $53.19 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 141698 THEKEITHCOMPANIES $3.424,43 ENGINEERING SERVICES 13SR 1416" KELLY PAPER $153.85 PRINTING 1417M KIMMERLE BROS.INC. $825.95 MECHANICAL PARTS 141701 KING BEARING,INC. $3,358.27 MACHINE SUPPLIES 141702 KNOK INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $85500 TOOLS 141703 L A CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $1.185.98 SERVICE AGREEMENT 1417M LA MOTTE CHEMICAL PRODUCTS $5269 CHEMICALS 141705 K.P.LINDSTROM,INC. $3.165.10 CONSULTING SERVICES-ENVIR.M.0.12-9-90 141706 SOHO-LYNCH CORP. $1,049.74 JANITORIAL SERVICES 141707 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS,INC. $3,261.111 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 1417M MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $2100.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 141708 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. S493,102.00 CONSTRUCTION M42-2 141710 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $331,42 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 141711 MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. $3,052,65 INSTRUMENT 141712 MICROBIAL INSIGHTS,INC. 3933.30 CONSULTING SERVICES M O.1 1-19.92 141713 MIDWAY MFG.E MACHINING $12.316,03 PUMPS 141714 MISSION INDUSTRIES $5,242.56 UNIFORM RENTALS 141715 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO. $757.00 INSTRUMENTPARTS FUND NO SIN - IT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 114!A PAGE A REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 11g0199 POSTING DATE IU30I91 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 181710 MITCHELL INTERNATIONAL,INC. 5150.65 TECHNICAL MANUAL 141717 MONITOR LABS $2,000.48 INSTRUMENTS 101718 MOODYS INVESTORS SERVICE $3,500.00 QUARTERLY FINANCIAL ANALYSIS 181719 MORTON SALT SWISS SALT 1817" NUSTMININOCORP. S953.63 SAFETYTRAININGVIDEO 181"1 NATIONAL BID SCIENCES S2,]34.00 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 141M NATIONAL RENT A FENCE CO. $257.18 CONSTRUCTION FENCING 141723 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES,INC. $1,202.50 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 181728 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $2.795.19 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 141725 NEUTRON $7,102.AK CHEMICALS 11026 NEWARK ELECTRONICS S7W.3K ELECTRIC PARTS 141727 NORTHWESTERN CARBON 62,A9.10 CHEMICALS 181728 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $145.74 SAFETY GLASSES 1417M ORANGECOUNTYVMOLESALE $341.19 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 141m ORANGE COURIER $153.65 COURIER SERVICES X 181731 ORANGE VALVE B FITTING CO. $0,218.36 FITTINGS = 141M2 OXYGEN SERVICE S2.230.09 SPECIALTY GASES tA1733 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $7,807.31 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP Clf 181731 PGC SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION 592.71 LAB SUPPLIES �--I 181735 PARASITOLOGY RESEARCH LABS $307.00 LAB SUPPLIES 1817M PSI SU16.10 HARDWARE C'T 141737 PACIFIC PARTS $059A7 INSTRUMENTREPAIRS 141739 PACIFIC PROCESS EQUIPMENT,INC. 510.60612 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES r 141739 PACIFIC BELL $165.20 TELEPHONE SERVICES 101740 PADGETT-THOMPSON $145.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 181741 PAINEWEBSER $28BS3AA REMARKETING AGREEMENT 181742 PAK WEST $13L56 OFFICE SUPPLIES 141783 PASCAL B LUCWIG,INC. S932,406.32 CONSTRUCTION P"S-F 1417" PASCAL B LUDWIG $39,W.00 CONSTRUCTION PIAYl 1417115 KPMG PEAT MARWICK CPA S8,560.00 AUDITING SERVICESMOSI I-W 141740 PERKIN-ELMERCORPORATION $1,617.75 LAB SUPPLIES M787 PIMA GRID SYSTEMS,INC. $134,857.60 RESIDUQSREMOVALM.O.S 91 141789 RHONE POUMNE $42.416.16 ANIONIC POLYMER M0311-92 181749 POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO. $702.13 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 181750 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE 51W.00 ICE 181751 PULSAFEEDER $2,799.10 PUMP PARTS 181752 RM CONTROLS $129.07 INSTRUMENT PARTS 181753 R 6 R INSTRUMENTS $4.891.72 ELECTRIC PARTS 1417M REMEDY TEMP $1,509W TEMPORARY PERSONNEL SERVICES 181755 MCJUNKIN REPUBLIC SUPPLY $973.70 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 1817S8 RENOLD,INC. S80.82 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 10757 SCR $399AI HARDWARE 101750 SOR,INC. $570.91 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 1417H SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS $379.76 ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIR 141760 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS S29IA5 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 181MI SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INR SM2,517.19 OCEAN MONITORING M.O O 94 FUNONO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 112L94 PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 11700/94 POSTINGDATE1V90134 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 141762 SCOTT SPECIALTY OASES,INC. $08.18 SPECIALTY OASES 141763 SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS,INC. $U.W LABSUPPLIES 141764 SHAMROCK SUPPLY f848.50 SAFETY SUPPLIES 141765 SHURELUCK SALES 510A41.88 TOOLS0IARDWARE 141788 SO-CALAIRGAS E2,934.57 WELDING EOUIPMENT 141767 SOUTHCOASTWATER E3824 LAB SUPPLIES 141768 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO. E1,911.12 POWER 141769 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. 535,52t.15 POWER 141770 SO,CAL.GAS.CO. E108,240.79 NATURAL GAS 141771 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. f1,718.00 DIESEUUNLEADED FUEL 141772 SOUVENIR PHOTO $38.98 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 141773 SPARKLETTSDRINKINGWATER $2,594.09 DRINKING WATEP/COOLER RENTALS 141774 SPED(INDUSTRIES,INC, $765.49 LAB SUPPLIES 141775 STANDARD 8 POORS CORP. f2,50BN COP PROGRAM ANALYTICAL SERVICES m 141778 STATE STREET BANK f13,203.00 TRUSTEE SERVICES M.0.7892 X 1417" GARY G.STREED E4,102A5 REIMS.PETTY CASH,TRAINING 8 TRAVEL 141778 SUMMIT STEEL 588420 METAL 141779 TALENT TREE PERSONNEL SERVICES E841.00 TEMPORARY PERSONNEL SERVICES tyl 141780 TECHNOMIC PUBLISHING CO.,INC. 5219.81 PUBLICATION -4 141761 TEKTRONI%,INC. f344A8 LAB SUPPLIES 141782 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $1.463.10 MECHANICAL PARTS fl 14 783 THORPE INSULATION E22523 PIPING 141784 TONYS LOCK B SAFE SERVICE $144.19 LOCKS B KEYS 1417N TRANELL BCOTTEN E850A0 DEPOSITIONS-PERSONNEL MATTERS 141787 TRANS E250.10 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 141780 TRAVEL AUTO E1,147.00 TRAVEL SERVICES M.O.B-0-BI 141789 TRUCK 8 AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $80.82 TRUCK PARTS 141789 TRUESDAIL LABS E284.00 ILAB NSTRUMENT 14iRR JOTUCKERd SON,INC. E55.$13.10 INSTRUMENTM.0.9-14-94 141792 TUSTINDODGE 513.W SMUCK OIL 141793 TWIU.S. ING AUTO GLASS ORIESCENTERS EJ,$70.31 SOIL TESTING M.0.7-13-94 1417M UNITED PARCEL SERVICES E70.39 TRUPARCEL ARTS SERVICES 141795 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE E888.39 LARCELSEHVICES 1417M VVRISCORPORC E1,180.82 MECHANICAL AB SUPPLIES 1417V VALIN COR CITIES SUP N $958.09 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 141798 VALLEY ANALYTICAL SUPPLY CO. E958.89 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 141709 VERTE ANALYTICAUNSTRUMENTS f425.70 LAB SUPPLIES 141709 VILLAGESYSTEMS UR E RI f1 107.61 LANDSCAPING TA SUPPLIES 141801 WATERENVIRON ES f107.B1 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 141002 WATER ENVIRONMENT CHEMICAL f57251 REGISTRATION 141803 MST-LIM SUPPLY CO. SUPPLY f31,572.81 CAUSTIC ICSUPBHYPOCHLORIDE M.O.&12-9260-1181 141M WEST-CITE SUPPLY CO, f474.04 ELECTRICSUPPLIES 141805 WESCNTEG E450.13 INSTRLAB BSUPPLIES PPLIES 1418M WITEO E005.13 LEGAL SERVICES 141807 ROODHOL WOODRUFF CEANOG APHIC IN f4$930.00 LEGAL SEREGISTR TION -82 141807 WOOD HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INST. E930.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION FUND NO 9199 - H DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 1l4 PAGES REPORT NUMBER M43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 11P0/94 POSTING DATE 1tA0194 WARRANT NO. VENDOR 14180E XEROX CORP. $6,374.91 COPIER LEASES 141009 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $787.84 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 141810 YARDLEY INSTRUMENTS $148.94 CHART PAPER 141811 JOHNSON YONOGAWA CORP. 107.41 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 141B12 RICHARD YOUNG PRODUCTS $73.06 INSTRUMENT PARTS 141813 ZYMARK CORP. SIA59.82 LAB EQUIPMENT 141814 RICHARD B.EDGAR S20O.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 1l=RVI $3,843,885.91 SUMMARY AMOUNT f31 01 OPER FUND 5,191.38 Y 02 OPER FUND 49 13,] .43 _ 02 CAP FAC FUND 7,WS.83 03 OPER FUND 32,109.58 03 CAP FAC FUND 128,375.W 05 OPER FUND 4.977.24 05 CAP FAC FUND 712.00 ' 1, 08OPERFUND 276.03 07 OPER FUND 1A52.14 07 CAP FAC FUND 14,571.84 911 OPER FUND 10.051.41 011 CAP FAC FUND 5,03.25 014OPERFUND $416.00 014 CAP FAC FUND 17.297.55 07914 OPER FUND 14.59 JT OPER FUND I,W5,890.78 CORF 2,204,320.50 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND 19,912.2E ,IT DIST WORKING CAPITAL 171.061 12 3,80.T,8B5.91 STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954 . 2, I hereby certify that the Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting on u8[pgw// Itl , 199Y was duly posted for public inspection at the main lobby of the Districts' offices on lull& aw 19 C.2f. IN WITNESS /�WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this day of Penny Ky a ant Secretary o each of th B ds of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1 , 2, 3, 5, 6 , 7, 11, 13 6 14 of Orange County, California F27A.1 REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIR 12-14-94 1) 2) Upcoming Meetings. A. Finance and Personnel Committee - The Finance and Personnel Committee is scheduled to meet on Wednesday December 21 . 1994 at 5:30 p.m. B. Operations Maintenance and Technical Services Committee - The Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee is scheduled to meet on Wednesday. January 4, 1995. at 5:30 p.m. C. Planning Design and Construction Committee - The Planning, Design and Construction Committee is scheduled to meet on Thursday. January 5. 1995. at 5:30 p.m. - End of Report - jAwpdoc\gm\jcrpts\jc12.94 SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 REGULAR MEETING DECEMBER 14, 1994 - 7:30 P.M. (4) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file any minute excerpts received subsequent to preparation of supplemental agenda, if any. (b) Election of Chair, as required. (c) Election of Vice Chair, as required. ................................................................................................................................................................................................... In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, i i this agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the Districts' Administrative Offices not less i than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each i agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the i Committee for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an emergency item or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the i attention of the Committee subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a I i supplemental agenda posted in the manner as above, not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. i............................................................................................................................................................................_................... 12/14/94 (15) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Update by staff and consultants on actions concerning developments of the County's Commingled Investment Pool. (b) Selection and approval of Agreement to retain the services of an independent financial consultant. (1) Report of Staff (2) Discussion (3) Consideration of motion to retain independent financial consultant. (c) Selection and approval of Agreement to retain the professional legal services of Bond Counsel. (1) Report of General Counsel (2) Discussion (3) Approval of Agreement (d) Review and Discussion of actions of Finance and Personnel Committee relative to Orange County Commingled Investment Pool and Impact on Districts during 1994. (1) Discussion of request by Director Gullixson to agendize this item. (2) Action: Boards' Discretion j\NrEN�m1pYN\1$%C.IIn SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 REGULAR MEETING DECEMBER 14, 1994-7:30 P.M. RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 4 Minute excerpts have been received as set forth below. Pursuant to Regular Agenda Item No. 4, it is appropriate to receive and file said excerpts: (4) (a) DISTRICTS 1. 2. 3, 5. 6. 7 & 13 tl f Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts from the following re election of mayors and appointment of alternate Directors, as follows: ('Mayor) CitvlAaencv District Active Director Alternate Director Anaheim 2, 3 & 13 Bob Zemel Tom Daly' Cypress 3 Cecilia Age* Walter Bowman La Habra 2 & 3 James H. Flora Steve Anderson Newport Beach 5 John C. Cox, Jr. Jan Debay 5, 6 & 7 Jan Debay John C. Cox, Jr. Costa Mesa 1, 6 &7 James Ferryman Arthur Perry Sanitary District Midway City 3 Margie L. Rice Grace Epperson r Sanitary District (b) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to receive and file written communication from the City of Brea re appointment of alternate Director for the December 14, 1994 meeting only: District Active Director Alternate Director 2 Burnie Dunlap Glenn Parker 12/14/94 (4) (c) DISTRICT 2 Election of Chair pro tem (to replace Iry Pickler) (d) DISTRICT 6 Election of Chair and Chair pro tem (to replace James Wahner and Evelyn Hart) (e) DISTRICT 11 Election of Chair(to replace Grace Winchell) (t) Consideration of motion to receive and file any minute excerpts received subsequent to preparation of supplemental agenda, if any. _........... _._....... ......... ........... ................. _.._...............__......_................ ........_........ _......... ..._..._._._.......................... _; In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, € this agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the Districts' Administrative Offices not less s than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Committee for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) i as an emergency item or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the i attention of the Committee subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a i supplemental agenda posted in the manner as above, not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting i date. ........................._....................................................................................................................................................................... i (15) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Update by staff and consultants on actions concerning developments of the County's Commingled Investment Pool. DEFER (b) Selection and approval of Agreement to retain the services of an independent TOFRNCE financial consultant. •PERSONNEL CCWI� EE (1) Report of Staff (2) Discussion (3) Consideration of motion to retain independent financial consultant. DEFER (c) Selection and approval of Agreement to retain the professional legal services of TO nNaNCE Bond Counsel. a PERSONNEL carrtEE (1) Report of General Counsel (2) Discussion (3) Approval of Agreement (15) ALL DISTRICTS - (Continued) 12/14/94 (15) ALL DISTRICTS- (Continued) (d) Review and Discussion of actions of Finance and Personnel Committee relative to Orange County Commingled Investment Pool and Impact on Districts during 1994. (1) Discussion of request by Director Gullixson to agendize this item. (2) Action: Boards' Discretion �•vamvm�e..aussa.An POOL CSDOC Initial Investment $7.48 Billion $441 ,315,00 27% Loss $2.02 $119, 1557000 Net Value $5.46 Billion $322, 1607000 End of Week Draw $117 Million $ 28,700,000 Necessity Draw $2.24 Billion $132,395,000 (30% Cap of Initial Investment) ,d (15) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Update by staff and consultants on actions concerning `. 9 developments of the Count 's Commingled Investment Pool. P Y f County Sanitation Districts of Orange County g ; e R y N I1.1 y . December 14, 1994 Presentation Outline • Status Reports Items . County bankruptcy/Districts' cash deposits in the County pool . Existing Debt Financing Program . Districts' 13-month cash flow requirements . Establishment of Cashflow Management Counsel • Policy Actions . General Manager authority Orange County Sanitation Districts w Status Report County Bankruptcy/Districts' Cash Deposits in County Pool • Status of County Bankruptcy . Overview . Formation of Orange County Pool Committee . Legal Discussion • Districts' Cash Within County Pool Pre-Petition s , • Districts' Property Tax and User Fees Post-Petition Orange County Sanitation Districts cz ` t °' k5 Q. < Status Report E Existing Debt Financing Program • Daily Rate Certificates of Participation (COP) $244.5 Million • Weekly Rate COPs $160.6 Million • Fixed Rate COPs $ 46 Million • Taxable Commercial Paper $ 46 Million • Reverse Repurchase Agreement Program $100 Million $597. 1 Million Ordrrgab 'f . Status Report Districts' 12-Month Cash Flow Requirements (7/95 through 12/95) Assumes 30% Release of Deposits Prior to County Bankruptcy Assumes New Borrowing @ 5% h= Assumes Interest Earnings @ 4% ' July August September October November December 13 Months 1 Beginning Cash Deposits 138,923,000 135,800,000 114,389,000 109,706.000 105,534,000 105,908,000 0 2 Release of Funds in County Pool 0 0 0 0 0 0 132,000,000 3 Receipts, 4 User Fee Apportionment 600,000 0 0 0 4,200,000 20,400,000 62,600,000 5 Property Taxes Apportionment 300,000 0 0 0 2,100,000 10,200,000 31,975,000 6 Cash Deposit/Investment Interest 467,000 454,000 382,000 368,000 364,000 405,000 5,172.000 7 Other Receivables 1,200,000 800,000 625,000 1,150,000 900,000 600,000 10,925,000 8 Subtotal 2,567,000 1,254,000 1,007,000 1,518,000 7,564,000 31,605,000 110,672,000 9 Net New Borrowing 46,000,000 10 Reauirements, 11 Payroll 1,800,000 2,700,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 26,100,000 12 Accounts Payable 3,000,000 3,000,000 3.000,000 3,000,000 4.500,000 3,000,000 43,650,000 13 Taxable Commercial Paper Program 0 0 0 0 0 0 46,000.000 14 Loss On Reverse Repurch Agnnt 0 0 0 0 0 0 9,159,000 15 New Borrowing Interest &Principal 215,000 215,000 215,000 215,000 215,000 1,375,000 3,525,000 16 COP Program Interest& Principal 500,000 16,000,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 26,900,000 17 Subtotal 5,515,000 21,915,000 51515,000 5,515,000 7,015,000 6,675,000 155,334,000 18 Ending Cash Deposits 135,975,000 115,139,000 109,881,000 105,709,000 106,083,000 130,838,000 133,338,000 Orange County SanitationDlstnrs « ""' Status Report Districts' Estimated Monthly Cash Flow Requirements (12/94 through 6/95) Assumes 30% Release of Deposits Prior to County Bankruptcy Assumes New Borrowing @ 5% Assumes Interest Earnings @ 4% December January February March April May June a NZ� 1 Beginning Cash Deposits 0 112,486,000 138,447,000 128,370,000 127,217.000 142,936,000 143,434,000 2 Release or Funds in County Pool 132,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Receipts: 4 User Fee Apportionment 13,500,000 3,500,000 0 3,000,000 13,200,000 4,200,000 0 5 Property Taxes Apportionment 7.125,000 1,800.000 0 1,550,000 6.800,000 2,100,000 0 6 Cash Deposit/investment Interest 20,000 386,000 463,000 437,000 459,000 488,000 479,000 7 Other Receivables 450,000 1,150,000 800,000 700,000 950,000 900,000 700.000 8 Subtotal 21,095,000 6,836,000 1,263,000 5.687,000 21,409,000 7,688,000 1,179,000 9 Net New Borrowing 46,000,000 10 Requirements 11 Payroll 1,800,000 2,700,000 1,800,000 2,700,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 12 Accounts Payable 3,650,000 3,500,000 3 250,000 3.250.000 3,000,000 4,500.000 3,000,000 13 Taxable Commercial Paper Program 26,000,000 20,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 14 Loss On Reverse Repurch Agnnt 9,159,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 New Borrowing Interest& Principal 0 0 215,000 215,000 215,000 215,000 215,000 16 COP Program Interest & Principal 0 500,000 5,900,000 500,000 500,000 500.000 500,000 17 Subtotal 40.609,000 26,700.000 11,165,000 6,665,000 5,515,000 7,015,000 5,515,000 18 Ending Cash Deposits 112,486,000 92,622,000 128,545,000 127,392,000 143,111,000 143,609,000 139.098,000 Orange County Sanitatiolr Di%"' Status Report Establishment of Cashflow Management Council • Purpose . To maximize Districts' Receipts and to minimize Districts' Disbursements • Composition: . General Manager . Directors of Operations and Maintenance . Director of Technical Services . Purchasing Manager . Controller Orange County Sanitation Districts " Status Report Establishment of Cashflow Management Council t • Actions Taken: . To shorten the time lag on the collection of receivables g . Expedited the invoicing of current unbilled obligations . Placed a temporary hiring and promotion freeze . Limited overtime to only non-elective needs . Deferred new construction projects until further notice . Deferred the elective purchases of major equipment . Additional scrutiny over travel and training Orange County SanitatioFf DIStnC1G Policy Actions h3 General Manager Authority Recommended Action: Authorize General Manager to represent the Districts in all county and bankruptcy proceedings . Authorize General Manager to negotiate with credit providers and investors on behalf of the Districts' Debt Financing Program and execute agreements with concurrence of the Joint Chairman or Vice Joint Chairman ►;. AGENDA ITEM N0. 12(b) 110) �. RESOLUTION NO. 94-151 AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 79-20 (CLASSIFICATION. COMPENSATION AND TEEMS OF EMPLOYMENT) A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION RESOLUTION NO. 79-20, AS AMENDED, RELATIVE TO STAFFING CHANGES IN THE OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Exhibit "B-3° of Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, is hereby further amended to delete one position of Engineering Aide II in the Office of the Director of Operations and Maintenance, revising the current authorized numbers as set forth below: SQO)IBIT "B-30 ENGINEERING POSITION CLASSIFICATIONS (Office of the Director of Operations and Maintenance) Approximate Monthly Position Range Hourly Equivalent Classification Classification Auth. No. Rate Sala" 3135 Engineering Aide II (1) 106OG 15.76-19.62 2742-3414 Section 2. That Exhibit aB-4s of Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, is hereby further amended to add one position of Environmental Specialist I and one position of Environmental Specialist II in the Office of the Director of Operations and Maintenance, revising the current authorized numbers as set forth below: EXHIBIT ^B-4" LABORATORY POSITION CLASSIFICATIONS (Office of the Director of Operations and Maintenance) Approximate Monthly Position Range Hourly Equivalent Classification Classification Auth. NO. Rate Salary 4425 Raviron. Spec. II 1 1063G 19.57-23.12 3231-4023 4427 Environ. Spec. I 1 1061 15.56-19.76 2760-3436 f� Section 3. That Exhibit "B-2" of Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, is hereby further amended to add one position of Engineer in Plant Operations, revising the current authorized numbers as set forth below: EXHIBIT "B-2" SUPERVISORY POSITION CLASSIFICATIONS (Plant Operations Division) Approximate Monthly Position Range Hourly Equivalent Classification Classification Auth. No_ ate salary 3114 Engineer 1 Ell $449S-6360 Section 4. That Exhibit "B-5" of Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, is hereby further amended to add one position of Pump Power Operator, and delete one position of Operations Supervisor, One position of Foreman and three positions of Operator-in-Training in Plant Operations, revising the current authorized numbers as set forth below: EXHIBIT "B-5" OPERATIONAL AND MAINTENANCE POSITION CLASSIFICATIONS (Plant Operations Division) Approximate ' Monthly Position Range Hourly Equivalent Classification Classification luth. NO, Rate Salary 5110 operations Supv. (1) E9 $4080-5775 5214 Foreman (1) ES 3355-4745 5119 Operator-in-Training (3) 2055C 13.21-16.45 2289-2851 Section S. That any other resolution or motion, or portions thereof, that conflicts herewith is hereby repealed and made of no further effect; and, Section 6 . That this resolution shall become effective December 14, 1994. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS V t ' OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA - n P.O. BOX 8127.FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 10844 ELLIS. FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 °'4'4ccW (714)%2-2411 December7, 1994 NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA THURSDAY, DECEMBER 8, 1994 - 7:30 P.M. DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 1 am calling a special meeting of the Joint Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, to be held at the above location, date and time, for the purpose of reviewing the Districts' financial and investment program with the County of Orange and the Orange County Treasurer, in view of the County's bankruptcy filing, and to take any appropriate actions to secure and protect Districts' funds. C7�, //�-•l n ohH n C. Cox, Jr. Chairman, Joint Administrative Organization COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA I OBAL EW6 AVENUE P0.BON 0127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 0272&0127 71.108&Ntt December 7, 1994 MEMORANDUM TO: All Board Members RE: Need for Quorum at Thursday, December 8, 1994 7:30 p.m. Special Board Meeting As you know from the enclosed notice, 1 have called a special meeting of the Boards at the above date and time to review the Districts' fiscal situation in light of the County's recent bankruptcy filing (all Districts' funds are held in the County Treasury), and to take any appropriate actions following the review and discussion. I would like to underscore the importance of your attendance at the meeting to assure that a quorum is present to enable each District to act. If you are unable to attend, please have your alternate attend. If your agency has not yet appointed a District Director or alternate to replace any retiring Directors resulting from recent reorganizations of your governing body, the mayor, or presiding officer, is named in the statute and, thus, can attend as the designated Director. Please call Board Secretary, Penny Kyle, or her assistant Petra Tyndall, as soon as possible to confirm who will attend the meeting from your agency. a// F0Z John C. Cox, Jr. Joint Chairman IN I&M 9 Presentation Book Orange County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County r December 8 , 1994 3 921 V� .x.: 3 r � r3i,�aF ''... Presentation Outline • Status Reports Items © County bankruptcy/ Districts' cash deposits in the County pool © Existing debt financing program © Districts' short term cash flow requirements a a.. © Districts' credit rating © Letter transmitted to County regarding property tax and user fees • Policy Actions © Provide bankruptcy representation jointly with other County depositors © Retain separate bankruptcy counsel © Appoint Districts' Treasurer © Establish Districts' investment alternatives and permitted investments © Hire bond counsel © On-going procurement issues © Communicate with the rating agencies © Establish future communications and action strategy with the Districts' Board members Orange County Sanitation O*st cfs Status Report County Bankruptcy/Districts' Cash Deposits in County Pool • Status of County Bankruptcy. • Districts' Reverse Repo Program. z /sow — <i • Districts' Cash Outside County Pool. - i8M Q--- rtla Orange County Sanitation Districts fib Status Report Existing Debt Financing Program • Daily Rate Certificates of Participation (COP). • Weekly Rate COPs. N, • Taxable Commercial Paper. sro P';:l v Orange County Sanitation Districts "fe . Status Report Districts' Short-Term Cash Flow Requirements TOTAL COMM.PAPER COP CSDOC 1216194 Interest on 93 Refunding S175A00.00 $175,000.00 Commercial Paper Retired 54,000,000.00 S4A00,000.00 12/7/94 Interest on Serles A $258p00.00 $268=00 Interest on Serbs C 5152000.00 5152.000.00 P o4 5900.000.00 $900.000.00 Commeclal Paper Matved 526.000,000.0D $26==O.00 12/14/94 Accounts Payable $200,000.00 $2AOQ000.00 12/21/94 Paym4 $900.000.OD 5900.000.00 12/28/94 Accounts Payable $2A00.000.00 52000.00000 1/4/94 Interest on Series A $500.000.00 $500.000.00 Interest on Sales C $300.000.00 $300=00 Payroll S903,00f1.00 5900,f100.0D 1/10/95 Commecial Paper $20,00 =.00 S20,OOD.000.00 1111/95 Accounts Payable $2=.00O.OD $2=.000.00 1/18/95 Payroll $90D=.00 $900=100 1/25M Accounts Payable $2000,000.00 $2AOO.O(ID.00 1/31/95 Serrd-Annual Interest on Sedes B S1452.000.00 51.052.000.00 Seml-Annual lntaest on'92 Refunding $4A56,000.00 $4A56.000.00 I 2/7194 Interest 9n Seres A $500,1700.OD 5500.000.00 ., Interest on Serbs C $300.000.00 5300,000.00 Interest on'93 ReBndhg $3W.000.00 $350.000.00 TOTAL S69A43A00.00 sm.000.0m 00 $8.043.000.00 S11A00.00000 Orange County Sanitation Districts et g Status Report Districts' Credit Rating • Taxable Commercial Paper Program was downgraded "E yesterday from A-1 + to C (Speculative) by Standard and Poor's. • Remaining Series B COPs have been put on Credit Watch. Orange Co � ld'.. Status Report Districts' Letter Transmitted to County • Sent to offices of Treasurer-Tax Collector and Auditor- Controller on December 7, 1994. fi • Directed that upcoming property tax / user fees be segregated from Pool „?y • Advised that the Districts await separate advice letter regarding future direction to follow regarding deposit into new investment E account. Response: Yesterday the Treasurer-Tax Collector said he wouls honor direction, but today there is now a question. Orange County Sanitation Districts % a R� I to Ilk Pti+TC.�M1To � NoTu $ \ rN Policy Actions Provide Bankruptcy Representation Jointly with Other County Depositors • Several County Depositors have organized to be represented jointly by a bankruptcy attorney. �F • Organized representation will be cost effective, encourage cooperation, improve communication and reduce divisiveness. Recommendation: Join other epositors to form a coalition(s) and authorize expend ituresl support legal firm(s) retained by the coalition(s). Orange County Sanitation Districts J yIN Policy Actions Retain Separate Bankruptcy Counsel • Districts may require separate legal representation to protect unique interests. rr:,f • Bronson, Bronson and McKinnon has been recommended by y General Counsel ry , o Recommended Action: Retain bankruptcy counsel to act on behalf of the Districts. Orange CoutifjIlIx Policy Actions Appoint Districts' Treasurer and Establish New Deposit Accounts • Currently, the Districts' staff is not authorized to invest or reinvest surplus funds or to sell or exchange securities or to deposit for safekeeping the funds and investments of the Districts with Depositories. • Presently, the Districts' Treasurer is the County of Orange ; Treasurer. • Presently, the Districts' have no access to a deposit account sufficient to handle large cash deposits. Recommended Action: (1 ) Appoint Director of Finance as the Districts' Treasurer; (2) Authorize the Director of Finance to establish deposit accounts to address immediate cash needs; (3) establish associated accounting procedures using CPA firm. - Orange County Sanitation` Policy Actions Establish District's Investment Alternatives Investment Notureof MinimurrV Mwnrurn Liquidity RAe Fees Invetmads DepmY Bdaue Lod Agency Treoerriea Agecim MarimumAoxunt Madmum B:cokedgaaterly. Shctodep®t and st Investment Fund Banker'sAooptmom belaxeis$20rrillion. trasactiaisper. Wthdray. (LAIF) Carenerd9 papa, Noninimumbdance marth is 1Q 4h quote > �, IbNerseF3purdvse DepmY Mthdravel: Withdrarrdls earningraeis .00333fims 'f AgcsreR;Amag nininumot$5,000cr avaldlewith 24 5.3b'A intact earned. Others geote-round lots hour advorenotice 3 only. orASPonlhesane J� day but bdore900 AM. Cdiforniaktitrage Avaldlefatw- Norrinimum Invetmentsad Bmkeddsily. .10%onthelst$25 Mengenet exenpt bond amadmum vritMraNelsae millionofasers under Ftogan(CAMP) proceeisonly. requiremerts arailaclest my time Nwerbe net minis maxeganad ad.OB% Invetsin rdewa507% on a9setsabove$d5 Treeuriea million. Agade;Bankers Aoxptaxs 80-0ireted Vey 9rort-term, Nominimumor Liquidity will depend on Depends onthe Rion fixed irxane Invr_Rmerd ara.aty very saead very ma(imumretairerrents thenrdurity ofthe n-durity. Intherege seurifieswilvay. Itisabuyer liquid -Fundsmtd searitie;purdmed. of4.P.T/d30deys),553% bevraenvrket. TheDstrictscer beirvetedamordirg (00days) protect itself through a to CA CO ernenet Code ocin"itiveNddirg praow Recommendation: Authorize the Districts' Treasurer to invest any new monies in very short, very safe, very liquid investments, purchased through a competitive bidding process and held by a trustee. Orange County Sanitation Districts FN, ` � Ik Ili,; P E Policy Actions Hire Bond Counsel • Certain COP and Taxable Commercial Paper related actions require Bond Counsel guidance. • Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe (Orrick) has recently served as Districts' Bond Counsel. ? '. • Orrick serves as Orange County's Bond Counsel. • Orange County has not granted Orrick a conflict of interest waiver permitting Orrick to serve both the County and other Orange County agencies. • General Counsel has contacted alternatives to Orrick. Recommended Action: Hire Bond Counsel to serve the Districts and review action if litigation occurs. w« ,g Orange County Sanitation Districts Policy Actions On-going Procurement Issues • Staff is investigating methods to reduce reduce short term cash demands by delaying projects, purchases and payments. • Staff has existing authority to demobilize/remobilize construction contracts. • Staff has existing procurement contracts/invoices provide late payments. • Staff has no authority to pay interest on late construction contract payments. i , i Recommended Action: Authorize General Manager to pay _ negotiated interest for late construction progress payments. Orange Count Sanitation Districts `' uNMI ON E i Policy Actions Communicate with Rating Agencies • The Districts Taxable Commercial Paper Program was Al downgraded and the remaining Series B COPs are on credit watch. S�y. • The Districts' Bank-enhanced COPs are currently rated AA/AA-. • The Districts must protect existing ratings. • The Districts must proactively communicate with the rating agencies. Recommended Action: Direct a Board subcommittee, staff and Public Financial Management, to proactively communicate with the rating agencies by developing an on-going communication forum. This may include scheduling visits with Moody's and p Standard¢¢& Poor's at some future date. M Oran Uft it Policy Action Establish Communications and Action Strategy P • Staff has developed a system to regularly fax late-breaking events to the Directors. • Staff has limited discretionary ability to react to changing conditions. Recommended Action: (1 ) Establish an Action Team consisting of theSteg Committee of the Joint Boards, staff and consultants; (2) secure services of an investment advisor; (3) authorize ' Steering Committee to act on behalf of the Joint Boards for expenditures up to $50,000 related to the County bankruptcy or the finance program of the Districts; (4) direct staff to research alternative sources of funds. Orange County Sanitation Districts e SPECIAL HOARD MEETING MEETNO DATE: Decen DE:T H, 1994 TIME: 7:30 P.M. DISTRICTS: 1,2,3,5,6,7,11,13 a 14 DISTRICT 1 JOINT BOARDS IBEYER! . .. ......... BARREN .......... IBEVERI . .. .......... BCRRERA ... _..... FER IREADFI McGul AN ... ... . . (LASZLO I ..... . ...... BROWN ........... _ ISTEINTZI ............. SN Iran ....... . (NORBYI .. .. .. . .. ....-6@6bw ........... _ ISALTARI .......... HREWW ........ . ISCOTTI ...... . ......�= ... .......... ISALTARELLB ........ WpBLpL.P........ �� (SANSO ............. COX ............. ISANSONE) ........... DEBAV ........... (BELL) ............... DESES ........... DISTRICT 2 IIIR•BBL1/ ............ DUNLAP .......... — ISCOTT ......... ... G ,, Fes......... IMAERTZWEILERI ...... SCISSION ....... — — IDALYI ............. RCKLER........... . IREADFI . ............ FERRYMAN ........ IBEYERI I ........... BARBERA .......... 2/ 4MAII6REYP........... FLOM ........... — (NORBY) ............ IBONEI . . ............ GRIFFIN ........... — (BELLI . .. ........... IWELCHI . .......... .. OULLSISON ........ . . . IMAERTZWEILERI ..... ECKENRODE ....... . _FL MARDI . .......... .. HAMMMD ........ _ IFLORAI .'....... ♦16�X011lP ......... JL NWNI . . . . ........... VMRi ............ [PARKER[ (1�Wi).. LEIRIG ........... ILUTZI .............40665 ........... IMINERI . . ........... LINN ............. _ ISTEINER) ........... 4iALWIF......... INC GUIGANI ......... LUTZ............. IGULUXSONI ......... ........... ......... [SINGER) ............ ZLAKET ........... 1 ILURI ... . . ......... MC W IOAN........ — (RILlDO) .. . .......... MOIMNO .......... DISTRICT 3 _ (ESTRADA) .. ........ BAPIGH ........... .. . ........ .......... (NELSONI ........... WNLAP........... lDUNLAR ... . .♦ .... PARKER........... ILASZLO) ........... BROWN ........... INICHOLSON) .A'�L.. ........... WORRY[ ............9ATEM ........... , IDALVI .............. RC m .......... (SCOTT) .... ...... IWORIEY) ............ POTTS .......... ........... (MAXONEY) .......... FLORA ............ _L� ILURI .......... .... R1100 ........... WONEI ............. GRIFFIN .. ......... 1 IEVANSI ............. RICE ............. IMINERI ............ LINN ............. IPOTTSI ............. MLTARELLI........ (MC GUIGAN) .d.... . LUTZ ............. ... ......•• — B16i4ii"I A:4k NOMiRRBON �[ IESTRADAI ........... MREN ........... — INICHOLSONI +*RM ........ .. . . RLAKET.......... .. . SINGER ........... _ IDALVI ........ . .... RCKLER ........ .. . .8G STEINERI............. STANTON ......... IEVAN51 ............ RILE ............. JG 15TANTONI ........... STEINER .......... RLAKET............ SINGER ...... .. ... . (MILLER) . ............ SWAN............ _ ISTEINERI ....... .. ..lFMRIBN ... ... ... ISELVAGGII . .......... SYLVIA ........... — ISELVAGGII ...... .. .. SVLVIA ...... ..... IPEFRY/SCHEAFERI .....-NYNMEi.......... — IGULLOMSMI . ......... WELCH ........... DISTRICT .......... ..••••••• — ISANSONEI ...... .... DEBAY . ........... -A-01 (SALTARE.. . ......... WORLEY . ......... SSTANTON) ...... .... STEINER........... i [SINGER[ .. . .......... ZLAKET. . .. ....... IDEBAYI ............ COX .. ........... JG STAFF OTHERB DISTRICTS WOODRUFF . . L IR:RRYI ANDERSON /L ANWAR.... . _ (COX) JL - - SERENSON DEMIR...... _ .. ........... NA .. .........RP HASENSTAS FLEMINO .... (STANTON) .......... STEINER........... �� — XOOGES ... HMENER .. DISTRICT 7 KYLE ..... . HOUGH ..... UNDER .... iI HOWARD _ IWARDI ............ HAMMOND......... NEILOR T HUT .. IFOTFSI ............ SALTARELLI ........ ,JKR,,,. KNOPF ..... SEINER) ............ BARRERA .......... �� .. .... IFULIDO) ............ MORENO .......... Jt� .• IEE........ STREED ... JL LINDSTROM .. IOEBAYI ............ SIENE LB ......... VINCENT... NMM...... ISTANTOM .......... STEINER........... TALES! .... BMW.. .... ISCHEAFEP) ......... AWMMMBI .......... QL WINS011 ... STONE . .... ......... WASON. . ... OISTIIICTII .......... YOUNG . . ... IRPWTiA1ttE/ . .. . . . . .. WmEH¢r...:::::: TZ / ` ! (STEINER) . ..... . . .. . SBAMiSIM .... ... .. JL 0^V 'AO DISTRICT 13 V IWELLXI ......... .. . GULLULSON ........ LI 444.6 .D:._V A6111616 IDALYI . ......... . ..RCQ.ER . ...... .... JG (�F! j IBEYER .......... . . SARRERA ...... .... JL IDALYI . .......... . . RCKLER . .. ........ . 15TANTONI . . ...... . . STEINER. .......... DISTRICT 14(MILL (WAR I . ........... SWAN .... ....... Q (WARD[ . ........... BAMMOND.. ....... (WORL(BEYERI ............ BARRERA ... ....... �ylf OLIO] IWDRLEY) ........... Mm ............ 10113/90 STEIN ISTANTONI .... ...... STEINER........... � — PUBLIC SIGN-IN SHEET i COUNTY SANIT TION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 2' °I BOARD MEETING NAME R ANIZAT N R Please Print Please Print =p��WN - 'Pt © SDI S ro h Se JA CT'51 cd AAJ A -PP c5 ooc COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES SPECIAL JOINT BOARD MEETING DECEMBER 8, 1994 d tRICTS OF09gy � G N y 7 J a vwv TMH E ENS\Pp��o, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 ROLL CALL A special meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitrtion Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was hold on December 8, 1994,at 7:30 p.m.,in the Districts'Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 as follows: ACTIVE ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO.1: . Fred Barters,Chalr Gene Beyer . James M.Femiman,Cheir pro tam Nate Reade Pat McGuigan Thomas E. Lutz Roger Stanton William G.Steiner Tracy A.Wad" x Thomas R. Saltiness DISTRICT NO.2: _ John Collins,Chair Gam,. Scon Iry Roder,Chair pro trm Tam Daly Fred Barter Gene Beyer _ U."CIA, a Chris Norby Barry Desire Bob Bell x Norman Z.Eckenmde Michael Meertzweiler _ William D.Whimsy JL_ James H.Flom _ Came,J.Nelsen x Burnie Dunlap _ Miguel Pulido Thomas E. LuG _ Roger Strauss William G.Steiner _ Daniel T.Welch _� John M.Gullixson x George L.2laket Sheldon Singer DISTRICT NO. 3: Sal A.Si ion, Chair William C.Estrada Burnie Dunlap. Chair pro tam _ Can"J.Nelson x George Brown _ Frank Laszlo Bnak.6al'. a Chris history John Callum George Soon James H.Flora William D.Mahoney Don R.Gifts Donald Bone Wally Linn Eva G.Miner x Thomas E.Linz Pat McGuigan Victor Leipzig 6a", far "M s Cecilia Age _ Joyce C.Nicholson Iry Metier _ Tom Daly x Margie L. Rice James V.Evans Sheldon Singer George L.Vaket _ Roger Stanton William G.Star., x Charles Sykes Anthony SeWfigi DISTRICT NO.5: �_ Jan Debay.Chair Phil Samoan William G.Steiner,Chair pro tam _ Roger Stanton y_ John C.Cox,Jr. _ Jan Dehay DISTRICT NO.6: a, deweeA.aVehavrGaµ _ Arthur Perry I, chairp eiew x John C.Cox,Jr. William G. Steiner _ Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO.7: . Barry Hammond,Chair _ Mike Ward L Thomas R. Salta all,.Chair pro tam Jim Pons Fred Barters Gene Beyer Ted Monaco Miguel Pulido Phil Sansone Jan Dehay JIB William G.Seem, Roger Stanton g_ dames0 Wram. Mike Schrader DISrRICT NO. 11: a....W.Iii,ilrfilNis li., Rah itaiga L Victor LeiptiB.Chair pro tam Linda MoultonAatterson Roger Stanton x Wiliam G. Steiner DISTRICT NO. 13: John M.Gullixson, Chair _ Daniel T.Welch _ Glenn Parker,Chair pro tam x Burnie Dunlap Fred Beware Gene Beyer * Iry Fickler Tom Daly * William G. Steiner Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO.14: . Peer A. Swan,Chair Darryl Miller y Barry Hammond, Chair pro tam Mike WON L Fred Barren Gera Beyer Jim Pons Tracy A.Wod9y s William G.Steiner Rorer Strmmn _2. 4 12I08194 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Blake P. Anderson, General Manager, Penny Kyle, Board Secretary, Catherine Biele, Ed Hodges, Steve Kozack, John Linder, Margie Nellor, Bob Dolan, Gary Screed, Jean Tappan, Petra Tyndall, Paula Zeller OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Michael H. Ahrens, Cindy Dennis, Grace Epperson, Norma Glover, Patty Gorczyka, Mark A. Murphy, Carolyn Seiler DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file written communication from the City of Brea That the written communication from the City of Brea re appointment of Burnie Dunlap as alternate for Director Carrey J. Nelson for the special meeting of December 8, 1994, only, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 2 In the absence of Chair John Collins and Chair pro Appointment of Chair pro tem tem IN Pickier, Director Barry Denns was appointed Chair pro tem of District No. 2. DISTRICT 6 In the absence of Chair James A. Wahner and Appointment of Chair pro tem Chair pro tem Evelyn Hart, Director William Steiner was appointed Chair pro tem of District No. 2. �..� ALL DISTRICTS General Counsel reported to the Directors the need General Counsel's Comments Prior to for a closed session as authorized by Government Closed Session Code Section 54956.9, 54957 and 54957.6 to discuss and consider the items that are specified on the published Agenda. No other items would be discussed or acted upon. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Convene in closed session pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 The Boards convened in closed session at 7:35 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Board(s) of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. A report of actions taken was reported in regular session as set forth immediately below. ALL DISTRICTS Al 10:23 p.m. the Boards reconvened in regular Reconvene in regular session session. -3- 12108194 Moved, seconded and duly carved: ALL D STR CTS A o' tin ca G. Streed as Districts' That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Treasurer authorizing the Treasurer and Resolution No. 94-156, appointing Gary G. Streed the Ora a Coun Treasurerfiax Collector as Treasurer of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, to Invest or Rei n' rrrs' Funds and___ Re ealin Resolution No. 73-16 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of orange County, California, authorizing the Distrids' Treasurer and the Orange County Treasurer/Tax Collector to invest or reinvest Districts' Funds and that Resolution No. 73-18. be, and is hereby, repealed. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adootina Financial Policies AOolicable to Investment Programs and Procurement That the Boards of Directors be, and are hereby, Actions _ authonzed to enter into an agreement to join with other public agency depositors in the County of Orange Commingled Investment Pool Fund, to form a coalition relative to the bankruptcy petition filed by the County of Orange; and, FURTHER MOVED: That an amount not to exceed $25,000.00, be, and is hereby, authorized as the Districts' contributive share to any such coalition to engage special legal counsel retained by the coalition; and, FURTHER MOVED: That a letter agreement be, and is hereby, approved retaining Bronson, Bronson &McKinnon as Special Bankruptcy Counsel to represent the Districts, in form approved by General Counsel. Director William G. Steiner requested that his abstention to this portion of the motion be made a matter of record. Director Norman Z. Eckenrode requested that his opposition to the motion be made a matter of record; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Bank of America, NT&SA be, and is hereby, approved as a depository for the Districts'funds, authorizing Districts'Treasurer to open appropriate accounts with the depository for payroll purposes and operating expenditure purposes, with the account secured by collateral, and invested solely in short-term money market funds. In the event Bank of America, NT&SA is unable or unwilling to serve as a depository for the Districts' monies, the Districts'Treasurer is hereby authorized to open accounts with First Interstate Bank or Wells Fargo Bank, which Banks are hereby named as depository banks for the Districts' monies. Directors Don Griffin and Ted Moreno requested that their opposition to the motion be made a matter of record; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Districts'Treasurer be, and is hereby, directed to establish associated accounting procedures and to engage the services of KPMG Peat Marwick to assist in the development; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager and General Counsel, be, and are hereby, authorized to execute an agreement with Brown &Wood of San Francisco, California, as Special Bond Counsel, to assist in all prior debt financing programs of the Districts, in the event of conflict with the Bond Counsel of record for all such transactions; and, -4- 12/08/94 FURTHER MOVED: That the Finance and Personnel Committee, Districts'General Manager, Treasurer/Finance Director and related staff and Districts' Consultant, Public Financial Management Company, be, and are hereby, directed to proactively communicate and confer with the rating agencies by developing an on-going communication forum and dialog to include a continual exchange of information between the agencies and the Districts, and for the holding of meetings with the rating agencies, as needed, in the future; and, FURTHER MOVED: That an Action Team, be, and is hereby, established consisting of the Executive Committee of the Joint Boards of Directors, Districts' staff, General Counsel and Consultants, together with retained Special Counsel; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Steering Committee, be, and is hereby, authorized to retain the services of an Investment Advisor Consultant, authorizing General Manager and General Counsel to execute agreement for said services in an amount not to exceed $50,000.00; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager, Treasurer/Finance Director and staff, be, and are hereby, directed, in conjunction with Consultants, to seek an alternative source of funds for the Districts' utilization in meeting Districts' obligations; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 94-157, Adopting Financial Policies Applicable to Investment Programs and Procurement Actions, which incorporates each of the preceding adopted motions. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adioumment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:23 p.m. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adioumment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:23 p.m. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adioumment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:23 p.m. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duty carried: Adioumment That this meeting of the Board of Directors , of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so ' adjourned at 10:23 p.m. 1 5 /� b 12/08/94 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Appointing Gary G. Streed as Districts' Treasurer. authorizing the Treasurer and That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt the Orange County Treasurer/Tax Collector Resolution No. 94-156, appointing Gary G. Streed to Invest or Reinvest Districts' Funds and as Treasurer of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, Repealing Resolution No. 73-18 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, authorizing the Districts'Treasurer and the Orange County Treasurer/Tax Collector to invest or reinvest Districts' Funds and that Resolution No. 73-18, be, and is hereby, repealed. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adootina Financial Policies Aoolicable to Investment Proarams and Procurement That the Boards of Directors be, and are hereby, Actions authorized to enter into an agreement to join with other public agency depositors in the County of Orange Commingled Investment Pool Fund, to forth a coalition relative to the bankruptcy petition filed by the County of Orange; and, FURTHER MOVED: That an amount not to exceed $25,000.00, be, and is hereby, authorized as the Districts' contributive share to any such coalition to engage special legal counsel retained by the coalition; and, FURTHER MOVED: That a letter agreement be, and is hereby, approved retaining Bronson, Bronson & McKinnon as Special Bankruptcy Counsel to represent the Districts, in form approved by General Counsel. Director William G. Steiner requested that his abstention to this portion of the motion be made a matter of record. Director Norman Z. Eckenrode requested that his opposition to the motion be made a matter of record; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Bank of America, NT&SA be, and is hereby, approved as a depository for the Districts' funds, authorizing Districts'Treasurer to open appropriate accounts with the depository for payroll purposes and operating expenditure purposes, with the account secured by collateral, and invested solely in short-term money market funds. In the event Bank of America, NT&SA is unable or unwilling to serve as a depository for the Districts' monies, the Districts' Treasurer is hereby authorized to open accounts with First Interstate Bank or Wells Fargo Bank, which Banks are hereby named as depository banks for the Districts' monies. Directors Don Griffin and Ted Moreno requested that their opposition to the motion be made a matter of record; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Districts'Treasurer be, and is hereby, directed to establish associated accounting procedures and to engage the services of KPMG Peat Marwick to assist in the development; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager and General Counsel, be, and are hereby, authorized to execute an agreement with Brown &Wood of San Francisco, California, as Special Bond Counsel, to assist in all prior debt financing programs of the Districts, in the event of conflict with the Bond Counsel of record for all such transactions; and, -4- a 12/08/94 FURTHER MOVED: That the Finance and Personnel Committee, Districts' General Manager, Treasurer/Finance Director and related staff and Districts' Consultant, Public Financial Management Company, be, and are hereby, directed to proactively communicate and confer with the rating agencies by developing an on-going communication forum and dialog to include a continual exchange of information between the agencies and the Districts, and for the holding of meetings with the rating agencies, as needed, in the future; and, FURTHER MOVED: That an Action Team, be, and is hereby, established consisting of the Executive Committee of the Joint Boards of Directors, Districts' staff, General Counsel and Consultants, together with retained Special Counsel; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Steering Committee, be, and is hereby, authorized to retain the services of an Investment Advisor Consultant, authorizing General Manager and General Counsel to execute agreement for said services in an amount not to exceed $50,000.00; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager, Treasurer/Finance Director and staff, be, and are hereby, directed, in conjunction with Consultants, to seek an alternative source of funds for the Districts' utilization in meeting Districts'obligations; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 94-157, Adopting Financial Policies Applicable to Investment Programs and Procurement Actions, which incorporates each of the preceding adopted motions. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adioumment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:23 p.m. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adioumment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:23 p.m. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adioumment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:23 p.m. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adioumment That this meeting of the Board of Directors , of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:23 p.m. 5 12/08/94 V..� DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adioumment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:23 p.m. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adioumment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:23 p.m. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adioumment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:23 p.m. DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adioumment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:23 p.m. DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adioumment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:23 p.m. Secretary of th o of Directors of County San io stricts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 -6- STATE OF CALIFORNIA 1 ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE 1 Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2,1 hereby certify that the Notice and the Agenda for the special meeting of the Joint Boards of Directors held on Thursday, December 8, 1994, was duly posted for public inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on Wednesday, December 7, 1994. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 8th day of December, 1994. Penny Kyle, S&etaqQf each of the Boards of Directors of County 95nitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14 of Orange County, California Posted: Decop3ber 7 1994. 4:00 P.M. By. Signat r